TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Aprilisse Archive

View 16 posts and 226 comments by Aprilisse on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
74

Aprilisse/r/MensRights21/10/16 11:11 PM
59

Aprilisse/r/MensRights16/10/16 07:40 AM
42

Aprilisse/r/MensRights12/09/16 12:12 AM
40

Aprilisse/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:17 PM
28

Aprilisse/r/MensRights29/06/16 01:26 AM
25

Aprilisse/r/MensRights11/08/16 12:34 PM
22

Aprilisse/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:25 PM
19

Aprilisse/r/MensRights06/09/16 10:19 PM
18

Aprilisse/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:05 AM
16

Aprilisse/r/MensRights15/10/16 01:34 AM
11

Aprilisse/r/MensRights03/08/16 07:30 PM
7

Aprilisse/r/MensRights01/08/16 08:47 PM
6

Aprilisse/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:26 AM
3

Aprilisse/r/MensRights19/07/16 06:37 PM
0

Aprilisse/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:54 PM
0

Aprilisse/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

I've seen that video before, it's great. That's right, according to them men worshipped women for their mysterious pregnancy ability (nevermind the fact that even animals understand how pregnancy works). But then once we turned to agriculture, men decided women's ability to bear children was worth nothing, hence they set up marriage where a wife and her children would be supported by her husband. /s
/r/MensRights04/05/17 11:46 PM

All hail the once great matriarchy with its majestic vagina yogurts and yeast breads! I do have to wonder how feminists believe this actually happened. I know they think it's tied to becoming an agrarian society which shut women out of power by tying them to the household, but, if they were so mighty and great before... how exactly did they lose their power?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 08:45 PM

"I bet there would be half the wars if women were in charge!" Today Hillary Clinton spoke at an International Women's conference and the hashtag for it was #Shebringspeace ugh...
/r/MensRights02/05/17 06:51 PM

"You should have sympathy for your rapist because they were just acting out in retaliation."
/r/MensRights01/05/17 05:55 PM

"Among the 400,000 murders committed by men over the same period, only 20% were against family members or an intimate partner. Clearly, intimate violence isn't a primary motive when most men kill." Also the table they use from the Bureau of Justice (Table 96) shows that 54% of male murderers killed an acquaintance, 25% a stranger, only 7% a spouse, and 0.5% an ex spouse, 3.9% a girlfriend. Whereas 32% of female murderers killed an acquaintance, 28% killed a spouse, 14% killed a boyfriend, 1.5% a…
/r/MensRights30/04/17 03:55 PM

http://adage.com/article/special-report-100-most-influential-women-in-advertising/mad-women-made-history-long-time-peggy-olson/237372/
/r/MensRights28/04/17 10:16 PM

Grateful that you are not forced into marriage, getting your breast ironed, being called a slut for being a female, and not having unequal pay? Both sons and daughters have been forced into marriage. In France, a man had to be 30 before he could choose a wife without his parent's consent, whereas a woman only had to be 25. http://lonang.com/library/reference/blackstone-commentaries-law-england/bla-115/ How would you like a glove of stinging ants placed on your hands for no other reason than to p…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 10:44 PM

The advocacy of women having the right to vote began in the 1840s with a small upperclass group of women and men. However when polled, the majority of females in the country voted that they did not want this. When finally a majority said they did (and there were already about 20 states where they could vote and many cities), then universal suffrage for women was made official law for the country.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 06:55 PM

A woman's right to vote wasn't recognized until men got on board with it. More like until enough women got on board with it.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 02:40 PM

Taylor Lautner was 17 when they filmed Twilight, guess that means any woman or man who lusts after him in that is a paedo.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 09:41 PM
2

What's hilarious is that the comic does show every feminist's wet dream. Only women in power? OMG our society would be so much more peaceful
/r/MensRights12/04/17 04:31 PM
1

I should clarify I mean a commercial to sign up for selective service, but if it has upcoming significance, obviously that means a draft...
/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:33 AM
15

The same kind of forces were to blame for society undervalueing women‘s utility as anything other than baby—makers in the centuries gone by. It's kind of more that there was no reliable birth control, so most women if they had regular sex would inevitably get pregnant and give birth over and over again. Despite that, poor and middleclass women were always able to work. Rich women, like rich men, sought to increase wealth through marriage, rather than work... because most people through out all o…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 03:20 PM

part of being a good man is defending a woman or weaker person against an attack or physical threat. What does it mean to be a good woman, especially in regard to her treatment of men?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:59 PM
3

Matriarchy is what a lot of feminists actually want I've concluded the same. Whenever you see articles written about matriarchies, whether human or animal, you see it portrayed in always a positive light. But this stems from their own biases because they cannot see men being oppressed or restricted. You can see this in the way the Mosuo and bonobos are described (even when the latter's tendencies for female violence against males is admitted, it's in a grrrrrrrl power way). And it all seems good…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:32 PM
3

you brought this on yourselves This would undoubtedly be the reaction of women to men if this was a feminist politician saying she didn't want to meet one-on-one with men because she was afraid of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:44 PM
5

The reason I was taught to view them as ubermenche angels I will never know. Because then they can get you to do things for them. You aren't likely to want to risk and devote your life to a smelly, plain person who isn't any more moral than you. No one worships an imperfect god.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:40 PM

Oh yes. Endless Dream Boyfriends stacked up high so that the female protagonist could climb them like a ladder to reach her goal. You can imagine what the reaction would be if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:32 PM

The worst part is that women themselves believe this. They never question how romantic notions are completely female-directed ("A man doing something for a woman is always a good thing!") and that their attraction to a man's "personality" is more about his potential to make money. Something that really shows this is female romantic movies/books. The male love interest must always have lots of money AND be a worshiping slave to her (as Pixar demonstrated with a 12 year old girl dream boyfriend: "…
/r/MensRights31/03/17 05:20 PM
1

The phrase is usually 'treated like chattel' , i.e. a possession. This just makes it more inaccurate.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:02 PM
1

Women also conveniently forget their own rigid standards for physical attractiveness in men.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:57 PM

Women love to play the game of Who Deserves the Most Sympathy. The more they can say how afraid or bad they feel about something, the more sympathy, compliments, and attention they will receive. They are able to receive sympathy for admitting vulnerability so they do.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 08:15 PM

For everyone knows a Truly Honorable Man would put a brown paper bag over his head before having sex and will be purely aroused by his girlfriend's trenchant denunciations of the logging and fishing industries rather than her naked tits and bare ass, which she has the right to show to anyone. Ah but then this would discriminate against, no we cannot say 'stupid' so let us say 'education resilient' women and we cannot have any discrimination against women. Basically when a women decides she wants…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:59 PM

Firstly, an inexperienced partner may buy into the myth that there is a sure-fire “formula” for bringing your female partner to climax and feel discouraged when his attempts flop. These myths are taught through false depictions of pleasure found in various media, most notably porn aimed at straight men. More like the depictions of sex in written erotica that women love to read.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:17 PM
2

Ah, as usual.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 10:59 PM
2

Not inherent to men, but it results from men having power in society. Yeah... not a lick of sense here. Ask them what they think of having only women in power. You won't hear that that too would be oppressive.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 06:16 PM

This says only 35% of female murder victims were murdered by husbands or boyfriends in 2012. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expandhomicidemain
/r/MensRights19/03/17 04:45 PM

Pregnant women and those who have recently given birth aren't very good at physical work. Particularly you wouldn't want pregnant women to do strenuous, dangerous work.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:18 PM
2

Most definitely it's an option. But it can be a positive to having options to improve your appearance, the negative is that you know you look better with them. The positives for men not using them is that they don't spend a lot of time on their appearance, the negative is that they don't have an ability to improve their appearance. If you're bald, it's seen as unattractive but it's also not acceptable to wear a toupee or even get hair plugs. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:29 PM
3

It has its positives and negatives. As a woman I have a lot of tools to improve my appearance, all of which are socially acceptable for me to use. Men are pretty much stuck with what genetics gave them.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:31 PM

Sassler and Miller (2011) found that among young heterosexual couples, men had the privilege of asking their partner to marry, meaning men controlled the marriage decision. You can't expect women to ask questions! They're too scawwwwwy !
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:34 PM
1

I thought it hilarious that the NYU article still had to find one aspect to try to present it as sexism against women: it was her smiling! Women are told to smile all of the time! That's why we didn't like the male Hillary!
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:33 PM
2

Why do women do the majority of unpaid care work? Also add: Why do men do the majority of unpaid house repair? Car repair? Garbage disposal? Burglary investigation? Disciplinary action with children?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 10:37 PM
1

I wish the article had displayed this viewpoint, rather than the one about class and socio-economic status. Feminists don't support middle class sexuality on display and disparage blonde bimbos on page 3 sexuality because it's lower class; they disparage it because the latter is clearly intended for the male gaze, while the artsy one could be considered as catering to women. Although maybe it does all come down to an unconscious mating strategy that is class-based. Females will always disfavor s…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 10:26 PM
2

She didn't even lead the army in the book she was simply used as the face of the resistance. She also spends most of her time trying to decide which hunkety hunk (who are endlessly devoted to her) she really wants to be with. And that's the main reason girls read the book at all.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:09 AM
1

You could counter with examples of women wanting these things, such as these traits are usually found in female romance novels (especially of the erotic variety), but they would just pin that on patriarchal brainwashing of women. They believe patriarchy is at fault for everything so the only thing you might be able to do is prove that patriarchy is demanded by women. https://truegendertheory.wordpress.com/2016/03/10/the-only-way-to-destroy-a-patriarchy/
/r/MensRights03/03/17 07:14 PM

If breasts are not seen as sexual parts of the body then they can be shown in public like any other non-sexual body part. But this would also mean it is not sexual assault to touch them, just like a man cannot claim sexual assault for a woman touching his chest.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:44 PM
9

If men are told that they should never harm a woman, then they cannot use physical force to stop a woman from raping them.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 05:31 PM
43

It's not because of her sexual orientation. It's because of the gender of the victim. This also overturns the typical argument for why molesting teenage girls is considered worse than molesting boys, the old "they have the possibility for getting pregnant" argument. You certainly can't make that defense here.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 01:33 AM
1

There are already subreddits that do, but it's fine to talk about problems that face mainly women or men as separate issues. It feels particularly important to talk about it for men because most people honestly believe that a) men don't have any societal problems at all or b) they are of far less importance than women's problems, or worst of all c) they are caused by their own toxic masculinity/patriarchy/whatever it's their own fault. There is a lot of 'shush-ing' that happens when you bring up…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 07:05 PM

Yes because we all know if it had been funded by only feminists, it would still be completely objective. No one seems to ask that question when a feminist film is made.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:07 AM
10

Which mainly entails giving her faults, the kind that hurt herself and other people.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 12:43 AM

What I really hated about that film was how differently the ending and moral of the story would be if the genders were reversed. If this was about a man who was gunning for a CEO position which would then require him to work even harder at his job, and he found out his wife had cheated on him... the moral of the story would be that he had been concentrating on his job too much, and he had driven his wife to cheat on him by neglecting her and the kids, and his family matters more than his persona…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 12:39 AM
0

Freudian penis envy.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 11:42 PM
2

All hail the great and terrible Uterus.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:25 AM

[3] White men have been voting in Presidential elections since 1789. Nominally, at least, black men were guaranteed the right to vote in 1870. Women did not gain the franchise until 1920. -Rich white land-owning men had the vote since 1789. It wasn't until 1856 that men could vote in all states without owning property. -Women began voting by 1869 in certain territories. It began in Wyoming and soon after continued in other territories as well as states. By the time 1920 rolled around, women coul…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:11 AM
4

a world beyond the violent stereotypes that squash all of us into narrow boxes of behavior and strangle our selfhood—or unable to envision it at all? You mean like the stereotype that 'all men are rapists' and 'women are morally superior to men'? Strange, it always seemed to me that feminism perpetuated these stereotypes.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:49 AM

So this is where women walk with keys between their fingers at night. Or we take certain precautions at night, making certain that you watch your drink, or your friend watches your drink in case it gets spiked." And when I go out to a club or somewhere with a lot of people, I hold tightly onto my purse and I don't leave it alone because I worry someone will take it. And if I have to leave something expensive in my car while I go run an errand, I hide it under my seat so no one sees it and tries …
/r/MensRights24/10/16 12:50 AM
3

No man has ever tried to touch me like this either. I have never been sexually assaulted. I think many women do have a sense of entitlement when it comes to touching men. Most women truly do believe that they could do this because they have an expectation that "of course he wants it". If you don't believe me, look at the reaction of any woman who has been turned down for sex.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 12:29 AM
2

I'm pretty sure most people in this sub want to address legal and social double standards for men in the world. And frequently social double standards lead to legal double standards for men.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:24 PM
3

So the first person asks the one out, showing interest, then reinforces further that interest by paying. Shouldn't the other person show interest by agreeing to the date and then also reinforce further their interest by paying as well? I see a date as two people mutually interested in each other (hence they both agreed to go on the date), rather than one person trying to persuade the other that they should like them.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 06:26 AM
3

Simply pointing out the double standard. I think she has every right to say this and any man does too. I don't see how Trump's comments can be seen as anything other than just harmless bragging however as I can imagine any female, particularly one who is considered highly attractive, making a similar claim about men: "they'll let you do whatever you want, grab them by the dick, they'll let you do anything." Trump may not be physically attractive but he's very attractive financially and to a lot …
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:05 AM

It really showed how much it impacted him when he said, "I don't think this movement will get big because men don't like to complain." She wanted to turn it into: "Well and because they're completely wrong about everything and they're evil", but he tried to stand his ground about that point. It was also hilarious and sad how after he spoke about sort of agreeing with something brought up in the movie, she would always do 'damage control' by stating over and over "my boyfriend is NOT an MRA, let …
/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:59 AM

I disagree, it gives too much power to the other person to simply use the askee for free food, entertainment, etc. Paying 50/50 creates a balance of interests, a person is far less likely to go out with someone they're really not interested in if they have to pay for it. If men and women asked each other out at equal rates, I would say your system could be fair. But considering that's not the case, we need a different system.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:53 AM
12

It's not as if there isn't a huge hypocrisy already surrounding leaked photos/videos of exposed celebrities. When women's photos are leaked, it's suddenly a privacy issue and any man who would look at them was a pervert violating her. Leaked photos of a man's nude body, it's really funny or sexy and everyone should have a look. If a male candidate was asked about if he'd seen the video of some female's wardobe malfunction, I'm sure he'd have to play the chivalrous card and say something like, "r…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:41 AM
3

It was teaser for a longer interview but it's most definitely real. Some reactions from others like The Young Turks can be found on youtube, just look up Hillary Clinton Lena Dunham Lenny Kravitz.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 01:27 AM

We should now be at the social rule that at least all first dates split the bill 50/50. For the man, it will ensure that the girl wants to go out with him rather than just get a free meal. For the woman, it promotes more dating opportunities because men will feel more free to take chances on girls if they know they don't have to pay $50 to take her out.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 11:31 PM
2

"In areas and times when it was a high priority a woman be "pure" for marriage, rape accusations were absolutely hushed up." There's likely more to this notion as well, particularly that most young unmarried women could expect to always have a male guardian around her, either a family member or a servant. The point being that they be protected at all times, particularly from such things as rape. Also of course there was the social rule that men and women were not supposed to be left alone togeth…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:09 PM
2

He feels protected because he won't view a woman brushing against his chest in passing as sexual assault. Topless women will not feel the same way.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 04:05 PM
3

You can imagine how disgusted they would be by a tissue with sperm on it taped to a streetlight as well (or urine or feces- pretty much any wet bodily function is generally considered gross by everyone). Women are even offended and disgusted by random boners in public, despite that too being natural. If men were to use the feminist mindset, they would point out that it's not really their fault that their body has a visible reaction to being turned on or just getting a surge of adrenaline. #don't…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 12:29 AM
19

Amy Schumer appears to be completely sober in her story, meaning she can very accurately interpret her partner's level (or lack of) of ability to consent, as well as when he passes out (as she obviously makes clear in her story when she tries to slap him awake). In the case of Brock Turner, both parties are drunk (he was only slightly less drunk than she) so it could be understandable that he was far less capable of assessing when she passed out in what appeared to start as a consensual encounte…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:05 PM
2

The usual expectation is that the girl's ring will be far more expensive. I think it's great that you didn't want that, and that you both have rings of comparable cost. Your system is fair when the rings are of nearly equal value, but that's not typical of the tradition. I was simply speaking in generalities, that's why I used the word 'likely'.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 02:01 PM

When one ring is likely to be far more expensive than the other (a ring with different types of jewels on it vs a simple gold band), this seems a bit unfair. It's kind of like saying you'll pay for his meal if he pays for yours, and then he orders an appetizer and you order lobster and a steak.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 07:08 AM

I am from the US, so I know we have a draft but we do not have mandatory participation in the army for either sex as is the case in other countries like Israel and others (at least as the OP talked about with one year service in the army no matter what).
/r/MensRights17/10/16 08:21 PM

I suppose I don't distinguish between it much because my country does not have mandatory army participation. I hear quotas and automatically think hiring quotas.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 05:22 PM

But feminists want quotas for politicians, CEOs, film directors, etc. So we should extend that to all jobs.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 04:05 PM
4

Well and they have their boyfriend's money. Or simply a guy they picked from Tinder to take them out and pay for their meal, entertainment, etc.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 06:44 AM

Great but we need to broaden this idea to also include jobs in mining, deep sea fishing, electrical line installation and repair, janitorial, construction, etc.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:09 PM

Yeah it's hard to find out. The picture certainly does not show violence. For all we know, the woman could simply be crying on the ground and the men around her are trying to help her up. This newspaper report mentions no violence except the policemen carrying off the suffragettes when they tried to climb over the fence: http://www.heretical.com/suffrage/1910tms1.html Several of the police had their helmets knocked off in carrying out their duty, one was disabled by a kick on the ankle, one was …
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:20 AM

This has stood out to me in movies, particularly in The Force Awakens. Rey is the "strong, independent girl" who can take care of herself... yet the audience finds it enjoyable (and necessary) for Finn to engage in chivalric acts such as trying to fight for her, holding her hand as they run away, etc. The strong independent girl must put up a fuss about this ("why are you holding my hand?!") but it's every bit as necessary for him to do this as if she were a damsel in distress. Female characters…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:01 AM
1

How can they claim "same work" and at the same time claim "we need more female engineers/politicians/scientists"? Do they not see how the latter negates the former?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 07:47 AM
7

I really don't find his private comments to another male offensive or despicable because I know women talk exactly the same way to each other. http://www.salon.com/2014/09/10/the_real_story_of_how_women_evaluate_mens_junk/ I also don't believe his comments are predatory. When he says, "They'll let you do anything, grab them by the pussy." I was under the impression he meant that they were so attracted to him, they would let him do anything right off the bat. I can easily imagine supermodels or a…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:42 PM
1

Or the reigns of female rulers, which you know, are included in history books just the same as men's are.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:25 AM

"There's no need for men studies because every other subject has already been written by men." So because a concept such as gravity or 2+2 was thought of by a man and we don't know that there was influence in that concept from a woman, we need to question the validity of that idea? I'm assuming this is the proposal behind 'feminist science' and 'feminist math'. But then, if we're going with this reasoning AND we actually believe in equality, then feminists would have to accept criticism of women…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:27 PM
6

Prohibition: when women made it law on men could and couldn't drink.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 03:59 AM

I had not viewed the film through that lens and it may make it watchable for me again. However it fails majorly on my Ledcheb test (opposite of the Bechdel test) because a) no female characters have any negative traits, traits that are presented as harming themselves and others and b) none of said negative traits are innate, coming from the characters themselves rather than presented as a response to society. Favorite movie that passes my Ledcheb test is Chicago.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 03:52 AM

but because the film is built on a fundamental misunderstanding of the relevant terms, including “rights,” “patriarchy” and “feminism.” Frankly, everyone involved could have used a vocabulary lesson Yes, always retreat to the "you just don't understand the dictionary definition of feminism!" argument. I'm gonna start some movements with completely arbitrary definitions that don't hold up to the actions of the group at all.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 03:46 AM
2

Please find out if they happen to have a wage gap amongst their own workers, ala the White House.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:09 PM

You're forgetting Donald Trump is a lot richer than Justin Timberlake. In a post agrarian world, money trumps looks/strength in women's preferences because in such a world, the man with the most riches is the strongest, therefore provides the best genes from his monetary success. A lot of the kind of women in that social circle might be looking exactly for an older man because he will then die and leave her his money sooner. See Anna Nicole Smith and her former husband.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:57 AM
1

I've recently thought this is what we should promote for feminists to prove their theories: create your own feminist nation, filled only with females, create whatever government systems you like, females will fill up all positions and prove whether it works and whether females like it. If anything the lesbian feminist population should totally be on board.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:27 PM
0

It's hard to know how many female rapists there are since the law doesn't define a woman forcing a man to penetrate her as rape and even when females commit statutory rape, it's not really seen as such.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:13 PM
2

They might make it a huge story, but it would not be seen as sexist, rapey, or some kind of affront to all men. I bet a lot of feminists would champion it if only because she would have simply done "what every man does".
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:06 PM

Imagine a female celebrity saying: "You know, I'm automatically attracted to beautiful men. I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the dick. You can do anything." I dislike Trump and I'm voting third party, but a comment from a female candidate like this would not cause uproar, certainly not endanger their campaign. And it most definitely would not be seen as an injustice to men.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:30 AM
1

It's more accurate to say that the law did not consider rape possible between two married people because part of the reason for marriage was to provide sex for each other. So either party could rape the other and it was also the reason for allowing divorce if one partner could not provide sex (which usually applied to older men who could not "get it up"). Think about what that really implies. It's not the husband's inability to sire children that makes it cause for divorce, otherwise it would be…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 09:36 PM
1

Without men providing sperm, there would be no country. Yes, as far as medicine and devices sold as contraception, such things were outlawed (after 1873). People through out history have used a lot of other things for contraception like lemon rinds or cow dung to plug themselves up. I don't think they were arrested for that. Maternal death rate for childbirth at it's most dangerous in the 1600s was at most 1.2% (1200 out of 100,000). 100 years ago it was 600 per 100,000. It is now down to 15 per…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 08:54 PM

Childbirth is not a service to your country, unless you are birthing the baby to give to the government. The point of conscription being a part of citizenship is that you provide a service for the protection of the government, therefore earning the right to protection from said government (as well as a say in how it's run). Childbirth, which is a personal service that you do for yourself, would then be only on par with say a man protecting his family from an invader. It's a good thing, but it's …
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:42 PM
1

Great example of this is Leonardo Dicaprio. The day after he finally won an oscar, articles were written everywhere about what a misogynistic playboy douchebag he was. Their reasoning? He was over 40, unmarried, and spent most of his time with supermodels. "All of his friends have married and had kids; it's time for him to grow up." And all I could think was that this would never be okay to say about a woman who was over 40, never married, and spent all of her time with hot young male models. On…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 02:12 AM
3

Upcoming headline of the near future: "We need more female females" (probably written by Germaine Greer).
/r/MensRights06/10/16 01:58 AM

What's particularly stupid about that comic is that both boys and girls just get soft generic animal stuffed toys in the beginning. You don't buy your 3 month old girl a Barbie nor do you buy your 3 month old boy a Lego set. Both are playing with "dolls" at first just because they need to be soft. Once they get older, distinctions in preference come about (although I still would say a parent is going to buy their child blocks and other generic toys regardless of gender), but this kind of proves …
/r/MensRights03/10/16 04:16 PM
5

Or declogging the toilet, taking out the trash, and any home repair projects. I'd love to see Sheryl Sandberg start telling women they need to 'lean in' to those chores too. Especially on mother's day.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:51 AM

Women attempt suicide more through pills and other less aggressive ways because it is 'a cry for help' for them. They want to signal to others that something is wrong with them because they can expect to receive help. Men commit suicide through guns and more completely lethal ways because they do not expect to receive help from anyone.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 02:22 PM
1

A pregnancy draft of nature is not equal to the chance of dying in war, particularly now when the rate of maternal death at birth is a mere 0.01% Even at the highest historical rate (think 1400s), it was 1% per birth, perhaps making it a 4% for the lifetime of an average woman. Now, I'm aware that you can have some bad things happen to your body because of birth, such as splitting of the perineum, diastis recti, complications from c-sections, and simply peeing a little when you cough or laugh fo…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 01:19 AM

It's not actually about pre-requisites, it's about expected contributions and responsibilities that come with full citizenship. Men are no longer barred from voting if they haven't signed up for the draft (although they are barred from taking part in other things like financial aid), and of course, many men died in war who were too young to vote. It's not as if they had to fight in a war before being able to vote. In that way, it should be "equal rights, equal responsibilities". My personal edic…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:58 PM
8

I suppose this is following the age old stereotype of how women want to talk about their problems and how men try to help: "I didn't want you to try to fix it- I just wanted you to listen! Ughhhhhh..."
/r/MensRights28/09/16 06:08 PM

There are positives and negatives for both. Women have the ability to increase their attractiveness through products, techniques, and cosmetic surgery. They also have the potential to make their entire body be considered beautiful. The negatives of this are that when enough women engage in these practices, most will feel the need to comply to be up to these standards of attractiveness. Also if your entire body can be seen as beautiful, then you'll feel the need to make sure it's always seen as b…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 04:19 AM
4

Females could generally expect sympathy from both men and women if they wrote an article about "I'm tired of being shamed for my tiny breasts" or "I'm tired of being shamed for my loose vagina". Women will say these are conditions men need to understand and not have any preference about. But mention a small or average penis (not even micro) and suddenly it's supposed to be understandable that they have a preference for larger. Same goes for height. Women are truly blind to their own standards of…
/r/MensRights24/09/16 08:19 PM
2

Yes it seems to me this tale is mostly told as a kind of comedy, the overt sexuality, manipulation, and 'gold diggery' of the wife of Bath is probably supposed to make her a comical character, but she is also portrayed as a sympathetic character. We're on her side. This isn't some woeful tale of her immorality which you might expect from a story written in the 1300s. But more than anything, the moral of the story (both in the prologue and the tale) being "just give women control over everything …
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:30 PM
1

"Because some blacks are criminals, I will walk to the other side of the street to avoid one even though that particular one is likely to be not a criminal, as I can't tell. The blacks I walk away from remain alive and well and able to work and feed their children and walk back to their homes." See? There's no discrimination at all in this kind of attitude. /s
/r/MensRights22/09/16 06:22 PM
1

Her logic is kind of like if male pregnancy and subsequent childbirth became possible, and she advocated that the male's traditional role of simply supporting through pregnancy, holding a woman's hand through childbirth, watching her go through the pain was not only sufficient but equivalent to women going through the pregnancy and childbirth itself. How many women would agree that their husband suffered just as much pain as they did to birth a child? I'm going to guess none.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 07:06 PM
1

I have always thought this is the true equivalent of a female draft, although didn't consider it as an aspect of war- though it certainly fits. If people want to argue that it is men's responsibility to offer themselves up for war because of differences in body capabilities, then certainly women are the only ones who could do this "noble job". Plus, I think it is an effective way to silence the "but you'll probably never be drafted" argument made for men currently, because of course women would …
/r/MensRights21/09/16 07:01 PM

"What will be the societal impact of sending our daughters into harm’s way, along with our sons, having them return home with missing limbs, debilitating head injuries, and broken spirits?" I guess the same as when it happens to men. If she's saying that this is alright because it's only happening to half of the population, then why wouldn't that still apply if we draft men and women equally? Because you know that doesn't mean everyone is drafted, it just means men and women are drafted in equal…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 03:49 AM
2

I'm not entirely sure because I don't recognize all of the scenes, but it seems to me most of these are presented in a way to make us feel the woman is the victim. A woman slapping a man is almost never presented as him being the victim of a violent act, but rather for comedic effect or to show that he did something horribly offensive to her (therefore she is 'right' to slap him).
/r/MensRights14/09/16 11:55 PM
1

I don't know what a self post is, and I have no idea what I'm supposed to do with karma. I made this post and the image because I thought it might be something people could share easily enough with non-MRA people to make them consider some things we don't often question in real life. If anything the comment section was interesting to see the responses.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 10:18 PM
4

I didn't read it either, I made up my "quotation". Men typically take the route of bragging about how painful and bloody something is for the purpose of showcasing how fearless they were. In that way I can see themselves claiming it for a noble thing. Women use these opportunities to show how bad they have it, having competitions with each other over who has it worse but for the purpose of capitalizing upon their victim status. They do the same with birth.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 07:55 PM

"They carelessly leave spots of disgusting manblood around as if marking their territory- and of course, women have to clean up after and pretend it's not a big deal." Sometimes I have the psychic ability to see other dimension's feminist blog posts.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 06:41 PM
1

At the highest historical rate (think 1300s), women had only a 1-1.5% chance of dying in childbirth, which amounted to about a 4% chance of dying from it in her overall lifetime. When either spouse died, most people remarried quickly because they needed either a provider or a mother for their children. Societies attribute children as the property of the father because he has the legal and social responsibility to support them financially. Also because biologically you can always know who the mot…
/r/MensRights12/09/16 06:32 PM
2

Besides what is this supposed to say about the past when it was the standard social rule that men give up their seats for a woman, open doors, stand when a woman enters, etc. I guess according to feminists that would then be a time when men thought their place, comfort and butt were less important than a woman's. (Which I agree with, but I know this doesn't follow feminist patriarchy theory).
/r/MensRights12/09/16 06:18 PM
1

I think it would be most effective for STEM classes to put up a sign that says "no women allowed", then droves of women will butt their way in.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 08:49 PM
5

Even though we live in an age in which women are starting to encourage each other to pursue jobs that have been traditionally held by men Wow, women are only now going into fields traditionally held by men? Weird how the first American woman graduated from medical school back in 1849 and the first American woman became a lawyer in 1869.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 04:21 AM
1

I disagree. Women are the ones with a social mandate to be violent (slap, kick, punch) if a man simply says something they don't like. It's a traditional mandate and yet one that is never questioned. What do women say when they slap a man? "He deserved it" which sounds very similar to "she was asking for it", now doesn't it? Considering how much 'kick-ass' female characters are praised (only kick-ass if they can beat up men), it's clear to me that most women see this as positive. This attitude c…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:25 PM

I wish someone would remake that comic with a woman staring at an attractive man's butt and an ugly man staring at her butt. She would turn around and be offended in the same way that the middle man does in this comic. Not to mention it brings up so many questions. Do SJWs feel it's wrong for the gay man to check out the other guy's butt? I kind of think their attitude would be, "Hey you should take it as a compliment." But somehow it is wrong for the heterosexual man to check out the woman's bu…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:07 PM
4

Syria is a good example of how the demographics of civilian casualties actually go down. https://plot.ly/~ebooth/85.png
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:35 PM
2

My favorite aspect of this is that we always look to this moment to demonstrate women's strength, ability, and desire to work outside the home. Yet, now there are so few women in the job sectors they worked in during the war. Pretty much as soon as the men came back, women decided they really didn't want to do those jobs, but will take that nice cushy office job thank you very much. Wait I won't make as much working this nicer, more comfortable job that requires less skill? Better start second w…
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:55 PM
8

Don't forget about age, weight, and measurements.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:36 PM
2

Just a few months ago they had a page about sexual misconduct and drinking, and they explicitly stated that you should never tell a woman not to drink too much because she might get raped. It then went on to state that as a man you shouldn't drink too much because it might impair your ability to perceive consent therefore you might be charged with rape. It appears they've removed this sage advice.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 06:56 AM
1

"We must question any negative allegations made against feminist icons because it doesn't fit our narrative."
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:41 AM
2

Next there will be a '5 yes policy'. You need to ask for consent 5 times before you can believe a woman truly means it.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 10:39 PM
3

Yeah while traditionalism holds responsibilities for men, it used to hold equal responsibilities for women. Feminism takes away those responsibilities for women but wants to keep them for men. Traditionalists might see the inequality more, or at least be opposed to the way women treat men nowadays.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 04:34 PM
1

I'm going to say it's actually an homage to Flashdance.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:17 PM
1

People didn't engage in warfare before 10,000 years ago? Even chimps and bonobos do. Although there may not have been famines in the place your home is located (because you don't have a specific location for home) there were still going to be droughts and natural disasters that would affect a large portion of land, therefore you needed to travel to find other sources of food. In terms of population this could have resulted in a Titanic situation for a tribe, 'save the women and children first'. …
/r/MensRights05/09/16 06:38 PM
1

School, as we think of it today, is a pretty new concept. The idea of a basic education is also new. For most of history there were simply trade guilds where you would learn a trade for the kind of work you were going to do. Most of these would be geared towards males because males had the most ability to work without impediment during their life; married women without reliable birth control were going to be frequently pregnant therefore would be unreliable workers for jobs that required a highe…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:06 PM
2

I completely agree with your stance on abortion, although I don't think that when a pregnancy occurs, it automatically means the parents must raise the child. I fully believe in adoption (I think it should be made a lot easier to do in the states) and I think either the mother or the father should have the full individual right to opt out of parenthood (excluding abortion). Meaning if the mother doesn't want to raise the child, the father cannot force her, and if the father doesn't want to raise…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:33 PM

It would be hard to say whether people felt overpopulated in history even though the world population was much less than it is now. People tend to conglomerate in cities, so it could certainly be the case that most people have felt there have always been too many people. On the other hand, I think there were many more factors in the past that we largely don't experience today. We no longer experience famines, plagues, devastating wars that wipe out nearly all of the population. Our birth mortali…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:25 PM

You can say the feminist movement started out for women's rights, however the inequality aspect of it is that it was never interested in equally accompanying obligations. The earliest feminists/suffragettes were certainly considered radicals, and the declaration of sentiments mainly details a whole lot of men are evil and women have always been victims.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:57 PM

Not to mention, women being the ones solely "chosen" for childbirth ( and all of the accompanying dangers as well as duties) was biological- they are the only ones who can actually do it. Men being chosen solely to fight and therefore die in wars is not necessarily biological, both men and women could have equally been chosen. But all societies have solely chosen men as the ones to sacrifice themselves (there has never been a society where solely women fought in wars and the men didn't). And you…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 06:01 AM

Birth is such a magical power that men will never understand at all anyway, women should be paid like rockstars by the government just for having the potential to give birth. Of course, we can't make women who can't conceive feel bad, so they need reparation money too. And on top of that when women do work (which should always be HER choice, thank you very much) they should still get completely equal pay as a man, but preferably more because she brings something special with her emotional connec…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:19 AM
3

Or the teenage girl purposefully gets pregnant so as to force the guy to marry her (which he would be pressured to do in a traditional society, still happens in conservative religious cultures). Communities largely never sought to help support women who got pregnant out of wedlock because they did not want to encourage this situation where a woman became reliant on the community rather than the father.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:10 AM
3

I don't see that in history. It doesn't follow the pattern of our closest animal relatives where single mothers predominantly taking care of their own children is the norm (in both chimps and bonobos). For our own history, the rich class hired wet nurses, nannies, and governesses to take care of their children, and lower class people might have lived with more family members around to help out. Work, usually being located within the home whether as a farmer or a tavern owner, allowed the parents…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:53 AM

Yeah I'm not sure why they allow men to refuse a paternity test. I think it should be enforceable for either gender (men can demand paternity tests for their children, women can demand a man take a paternity test). The best solution is to have mandatory paternity testing at birth.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 02:45 PM
2

Which isn't even truly comparable because that still means she has a child out there raised by someone else. In the male situation, he finds out he had no child at all and also that it was his partner who deceived him with a child of an affair. The only way a male could do the same thing would be if he convinced his wife she was pregnant when she wasn't and then pretended the baby of his mistress' was theirs. I kind of think women would have a big problem with this.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 02:41 PM

Mainly because women want taller men. More guys are okay with women being taller than them than women are okay with men being shorter than them. You do actually find a lot of references to men preferring tall women in the past. Hence this is one of the perks of wearing high heels. Something that comes to mind is Benedick in Much Ado About Nothing disparaging his friend's attraction to 'Leonardo's short daughter'.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 03:47 AM

This is my favorite response to women talking about how their boobs are not sexual organs therefore men have no reason to find them sexually attractive. Biceps, abs, and shoulders have nothing to do with sex either, but women seem to find this the most attractive part of a man's body.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 03:42 AM
4

"Yes white people may get killed by cops, but black lives are the ones at higher risk." = "Yes women may sometimes be victims of crimes, but men are the ones at higher risk."
/r/MensRights02/09/16 09:42 PM
1

Thanks. :) I've always thought it would be hilarious to write a romance novel for men, using the typical techniques of the genre. If only to point out to women how objectified men are in them. I notice the guys of romance novels (erotica and otherwise) are mostly alpha male types (rich, successful, powerful, handsome, domineering, strong) coupled with just a few of the beta male attributes such as able to commit, monogamous, caring, good with children. Mr. Darcy, Rhett Butler, Edward Cullen, and…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:49 PM
1

Been reading through a lot of comments, can't remember exactly what you specifically wrote except that it was reasons for why there's not a lot of female "porn" (from the perspective that only visual porn is porn). My contention is that female porn just takes a written form, so it's kind of like asking why there aren't more males writing erotica for men. Karen Straughan spoke about this, having been an erotica writer in the past. All of the cues for fertility markers in females for males are vis…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:42 PM

BUT: every sexual encounter still comes with the fear of pregnancy and to a lesser extent disease. So. Slut-shaming by women usually happens only in a society in which expectations are that a woman will not be promiscuous. The first part is the reason for the second, it is the reason why most societies and animal species have females less choosy than men about their sexual partners. Because they have to deal with the biological repercussions of sex and the heavier the repercussions, the less lik…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:12 PM

Women's porn is extremely prevalent, it just takes the form of erotic romance novels and fanfiction. Women prefer the mental erotic stimulation rather than visual.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:22 PM
2

The semi-rape fantasy that sells so many books is about helplessness. Nah it's about having the absolute perfect guy (rich, handsome, strong, intelligent) be so obsessed with you and particularly how beautiful you are that he has to have you. It's viewed as a power trip from the woman's perspective because it's all about how you and your amazingness is driving this perfect guy absolutely crazy with lust- and secretly love of course. This is not something that came about from the 80s. I saw the s…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 06:01 AM
3

I actually call the male version the "manwhore-lovevirgin complex. Women want a man who has slept with tons of women so that he can know how to please her body better than she can and yet be a love virgin so that she can be the first and last to pierce his heart. That's also an extremely common trope amongst romance novels.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:47 AM

For females and males, biologically sex has always at least been tied to a kind of relationship agreement. Most of the time there's some kind of exchange of services: I'll birth your offspring and you provide me with protection from possible outsiders. Even the more promiscuous bonobos use sex as a way to soothe each other from fighting and therefore reinforce relationships. It's hard to say whether animals in polygamous or promiscuous settings feel "romance" for each other, but perhaps pair-bon…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:38 AM
0

Being as sperm must be ejaculated in some way from the male body at least every 2 weeks or so, it makes sense that sex for men is a need. Not only that but male sexual strategy is to have as much sex as possible and as frequently as possible. Female sexual strategy is going to be based more on whether she's ovulating or not (the time she most wants sex) and being more selective about the partner she engages in sex with (needs to have the right genes at the very least). I believe sex is highly co…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:16 AM
1

That's what I kept thinking when reading the original article, it's all about the way she would like to have things done. Her husband might be doing things in a different way than she would, that doesn't mean it's necessarily wrong. Most of the time I think it's good for parents to exhibit slightly different parenting styles. Not to mention, most women enjoy casting themselves in the role of the martyr because they thrive off the sympathy they get when telling others, "oh woe is me."
/r/MensRights30/08/16 10:27 PM
2

I agree, and this is why fashion has always been a woman's domain, but particularly rich women. The richer you are, the more impractical your clothing can be because you don't have to do anything but sit around in it. All of this has to do with the status of having so much free time that either you or a servant can work on something so delicate and detailed you can only wear it once. Hence the things that women consider "pretty" and "feminine" largely have to do with more and more tiny details a…
/r/MensRights30/08/16 07:25 PM

I think the example of women cheering on when a woman cuts off her husband's penis is enough to show that they admire violence in women. The same for any viral youtube video of 'girl kicks guys' ass'. We never need a reason for why it's happening, we just know that somehow he must be in the wrong. I agree they don't just want a female character who could easily be replaced with a man and not have anything about the characteristics changed, but for every female character there is, they want her t…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 09:00 PM
3

Because if they asked one female athlete who had been "objectified" for her body and she said that she didn't really mind it, we can totally take that as representing how all women feel on the matter. Also, men have been objectified for their money, protection, disposability, and oh yes, for their physical looks since the dawn of time. If you were at least to ask men how they felt about women caring how much money they make, they wouldn't be able to shrug it off so easily. And about the physical…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:24 PM

Wouldn't this actually allow men to be able to claim rape against a woman? Because there is no strict reliance on penetration anymore?
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:06 PM

It's an extremely popular female role nowadays. Actually the thing that really stuck out to me about Ygritte was when she shoots Jon Snow with arrows for betraying her. How many women think that's so bad ass and cool of her, but we would never think that if the genders were reversed. Women seem to prize toxic masculinity so long as a female does it.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:43 PM
2

How exactly do you know? Part of the sexual revolution was women saying, "You don't have to be careful about your speech around me. You can compliment me in a sexual way because I am a sexual being." Now a few women want to go back to the Victorian ways of at least approaching women. And it was actually a social etiquette rule that men not speak with women they didn't know on the street. They were required to help them with anything, but not speak any more than was necessary to help them. Sounds…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:30 PM
2

"You shouldn't. Nobody benefits and it makes the vast majority of people feel uncomfortable, especially if their initial rebuffal is not respected." I'm sorry to tell you this but you do not speak for the whole of humanity. People have always been sexual with each other, it is our most basic interaction and drive in life. It happened in strict Victorian times therefore it will certainly happen in a post sexual revolution world. You don't get to have sexual freedom with Victorian rules about spea…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:11 PM
4

We already know that women get off with lighter sentencing (and arrests and all forms of the justice system) for the same crime as men, so statistics don't reflect an accurate picture. When women commit crimes, they are less likely to be seen as committing a crime by anyone. There are also things women frequently do which we don't consider crimes (though I think we should) such as paternity fraud and deliberately impregnating herself against the man's wishes. I would also say that frequently wom…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 12:49 AM

Most people don't group the street/park/gym with the workplace. The workplace has specific rules about sexual interaction and flirting between people. Most places specifically discourage workplace relationships. As a society we agree that going to work isn't a choice nor is it a place for regular social interactions. Largely, work is supposed to be about work, hence you'll be punished if your break chatting with friends goes on for too long or you're dressed inappropriately. Everywhere else, but…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 11:57 PM

Actually that's not a social rule, because the majority of people think someone commenting on them, particularly in a positive way, isn't a big deal. Welcome to the world of post sexual revolution where people do indeed think that sex is something everyone wants frequently and possibly with strangers, and complimenting people in a sexual way is a part of that. With many guys (cough: guys less attractive than the woman), it's not so effective, but I really don't think you can tell me that you wou…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 07:40 PM

I'll await the blog post next year about how men need to stop making eye contact with women when they are working out, or just on the street, or in general.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:53 PM
2

And a quote from John Green's The Fault In Our Stars to showcase the female mindset about this: Look, let me just say it: He was hot. A nonhot boy stares at you relentlessly and it is, at best, awkward and, at worst, a form of assault. But a hot boy... well. Let's flip the gender to see how offensive that is: Look, let me just say it: She was hot. A nonhot girl stares at you relentlessly and it is, at best, awkward and, at worst, a form of assault. But a hot girl... well.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:48 PM

That would imply women tend to make the first move, which they don't. A lot of women prefer to act uncaring to see if the guy is interested in her, therefore making him make the first move. And doesn't eye contact and a smile from the girl predicate on the man having at least stared at her first? Isn't staring part of the creepy behavior list? Who are women to say 'Thou shalt not look upon me or speak to me unless I first indicate that it is ok.' Can you possibly imagine how it might feel as a w…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:21 PM

There are a lot of women who do like to get attention and will specifically wear outfits like that to invite attention. Hence men will have no idea which women want that kind of attention and which do not. But hey, how about starting a clothes company that says "Don't pay attention to me!!!" so that those women can make it clear.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:08 PM
2

It's like a woman who puts on make up in a conventionally attractive way, dresses in a conventionally sexy way, yet claims it's all "for herself". If you do that in a non-conventional way, say putting make-up on like a Van Gogh painting and wearing a dress like a balloon, I'll readily believe that's all "for you". But if you're following conventional ways to look attractive, you are inherently trying to look attractive according to prescribed notions of attractiveness. The woman in the article w…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:28 AM

You don't see people who dress flamboyantly or with tattoos, body piercings, rainbow colored hair as 'inviting attention'? Have you ever talked to these people? I'm pretty sure they get comments all of the time about their appearance, sometimes quite negative, and yes, by choosing to appear that way they invite people to comment. It's a consequence of standing out from the crowd, and since they are choosing to do so with their appearance, they need to learn to deal with it. Attractive people get…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:15 AM
4

And the women who grow up in those areas know how to deal with those comments, either positively or negatively. Truthfully, none of these men would act this way if it never or seldom worked. And if Ryan Gosling said to any woman passing by, "You've got the best ass I've ever seen," she would gush about it at parties for the rest of her life and inscribe it on her gravestone.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 09:48 PM
3

Sorry that's not my definition of rape. A rape cannot occur unless one person persists in forcing sex while knowing (it having been made clear to them from the other person) that the other person does not want it. Everything else can be considered a bad sexual experience, but I lay the fault on the person who did not make it clear that they did not want to continue. We live in a world where most people engage in full on sex, it is the expectation when you start to become physical with someone el…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:04 AM

I simply wonder, if indeed the MRM and feminism are united in rejecting the legitimacy of these kinds of constraints on women, what precisely is the domain of their dispute? At least I think that's what I'm wondering. Feminists have always blamed those social norms on the evil dominating nature of men, rather than recognized it as men conforming to the wishes of most women at the time. A few women saw these practices as belittling women, treating them as incapable, but most were either conformin…
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:46 PM

In your scenario, a demonstrably illegal act has occurred: you killed someone either through intent to murder or manslaughter. It's obvious to everyone because the act involved killing someone, something that is never legal (unless in war or defending your life). With rape, the question is whether an illegal act occurred at all because it's simply about whether a person forced someone else to have sex against their will (or while unable to consent). The question becomes: did one intend to force …
/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:16 PM

"That is, some women want to be completely respected for their capabilities and strength of character while also wanting to be led, supported and cared for emotionally, socially and yes, sometimes even economically when they are with a man. The stronger a woman is emotionally or professionally in her daily life, the more she may desire some aspect of this." It's called hypergamy!
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:25 PM
1

I've always thought feminists should develop a game called Problematic, similar to 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon, where you name a person, object, or concept and find a way to say that it is sexist towards women. I mean, this is what feminists already do in their safe spaces/university classes.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:14 PM

Why can't Lifetime make tv movies about these, rather than husbands who try to murder their wives, teenage pregnancies, etc?
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:36 PM
1

If the rules were flipped, and it was that "women should open doors for men" and particularly for the reason that the woman should act as a shield to any danger a man might encounter, it would be easy to understand why these rules should go (and wouldn't this truly showcase a misogynistic cultural belief, prioritizing male safety over females?). But somehow, the current rule is still okay because ladies like it and that's all that matters apparently. No need to ask what men like. Here are some o…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:08 PM

Brock Turner fingered an unconscious woman, who may have passed out after she consented to the act and since he was nearly as drunk as she, he may not have been aware that she passed out. The comparison would be if she continued to give him a handjob, and being incredibly drunk, did not notice when he passed out and continued rubbing his dick. I think many women would climb on top and ride a guy even if he passed out, stemming from the idea that he would always want it. If anything she would be …
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:00 AM
4

Please find me a reliable source that tells you that feminism strives for a world without men. -the kill all men hashtag trend on twitter -"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future – If There Is One – Is Female -"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the pop…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:57 AM

http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/familyfacts/charts/205-FF-download.jpg This at least shows that the rate of single mothers increased dramatically after 1960, probably tied to the introduction of the birth control pill. I don't know exactly when government assistance became more readily available to single mothers, but I imagine it would be around this time as well (if anything in response to the increasing amount of single mothers). I think you'd have to take away male financial support as wel…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 04:18 AM

How many families would you categorize as the wife/mother having pretty much all of the power? At least in control of the majority of decisions, i.e. if she doesn't like it, it ain't happening? That's what I would call the dominant member.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 04:03 AM
1

Just about every crime has the perpetrator victimizing people of their own demographic: black people commit crime against black people, whites against whites, and men against men. There are some some differences such as women being more likely to be raped and kidnapped (by men), but then it is also true that men make up 80% of the victims of female murderers. For the vast majority of cases, men prefer to harm men and women prefer to harm men.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 09:45 PM
5

The thing is, bicycles have never needed fish either...
/r/MensRights16/08/16 05:55 AM

Yeah I was about to say I'd like to see how women would react if they no longer got reactions from men when wearing skimpy outfits. But then they would just blame men for having unrealistic expectations of them that there are no real women good enough for them. Women want to be admired for their beauty, they just want every woman to be thought of as a perfect goddess no matter what she looks like and the only men who can make actual advances need to be Christian Grey types.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 07:02 PM
3

I completely agree. But you said the law used to allow such and such, and I wanted to correct that myth.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:24 PM

Well technically the law implied that neither a husband nor wife could rape the other because each partner had rights to the other's body as sex was a basic tenet of marriage. In fact you could get a divorce if your spouse was impotent, and it turns out many women did just that. I doubt there was ever a law that allowed a slave owner to rape his slave, if anything because interracial relations were looked down upon, particularly children stemming from such a union. Now, just because there was no…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:06 PM
0

This is kind of like the pretty woman with DD cleavage always out who complains "the only thing men are interested in is sex from me". Most of the time, it's because that's the signal they're putting out. Personally, I don't think the methods you're currently using are all that bad. It would be like the woman who doesn't wear make-up, doesn't wear revealing outfits, and keeps sex off the table for awhile because she wants to find the guy who is interested in her for her. It's a pretty good strat…
/r/MensRights13/08/16 11:42 PM
5

The main difference being, chances are your assailants will be male and if they do attack you, you will likely be mugged, maybe beaten up. Getting seriously injured or even killed is somewhat unlikely, right? This after a long comment about how men receive higher degrees of physical assault than women. And no one brought up how men are 75% of the victims of male murderers and 80% of the victims of female murderers....
/r/MensRights13/08/16 07:24 PM

These same women who aren't responsible probably won't be responsible in taking a pill, getting a shot, etc. I guess the government should send a person to every woman's house to force a pill down her throat to make sure she takes it everyday, right? And all for free because we can't expect a woman to be responsible for her own body. The birth control of 'don't have one specific type of sex 1 week out of the month' sounds like the easiest one to follow to me. The women I've seen on pregnancy boa…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 03:55 AM

Women are deciding their own fate when they engage in sexual acts where the expected outcome is pregnancy and then are shocked when they become pregnant. We have not yet totally divorced sex and pregnancy, so it's something women still need to consider when engaging in sex. Don't want to get pregnant? Don't engage in intercourse during the week that you can get pregnant- do other sexual acts. Millions of women start studying up on when they ovulate when they want to get pregnant, so why not do i…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:42 AM
1

The feelings you mention highlight the complexity of the situation but only because of our biology. Your DNA has been built for taking on risk like in war, so of course you'll feel that someone else going to war for you, especially a woman, isn't a good thing. Women on the other hand have clearly not felt that way, even in our modern times when there are so few females in the army (and fewer still in combat roles). Women have not suddenly signed up for wars in massive numbers so therefore do not…
/r/MensRights11/08/16 08:43 PM
1

Male chimps are nearly twice the size of females. Most countries have a 4-5 inch difference between males and females. Human males are not that much bigger than females, especially compared with other species. I understand your theory and it might appeal very well to feminists and SJWs, but I don't think it holds up well when looking at other species. According to your logic, any time one animal happens to be born bigger and stronger than most of its species, then it will exert its power over th…
/r/MensRights11/08/16 08:16 PM

I've always believed that women would be a lot more interested in watching men's sports if the men had their shirts off, and so I don't blame men for feeling similarly about women's sports. It does seem like women's beach volleyball teams are capitalizing on this (I don't know much about the sport so I have no idea if playing in a bikini is somehow better for movement).
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:41 PM
1

SJWs (that term already sounds like the new religion to come preaching at your door) is the new virtue signaling. It seems to be an essential feature of society, the ideals just change a little with time.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:35 PM

Someone made a comment under the article that the Bear lineman's wife was from their hometown and in their newspaper the husband wasn't mentioned. But that makes sense because it was newsworthy enough for her to be from their hometown and have won in the Olympics. But for a national newspaper, it would reach more people if they mention that she's the wife of a famous football player. I'm sure there is a similar effect for men who are unbeknownst except for having a more famous wife.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:31 PM
3

To be honest, I don't think people in the past thought of women as "disabled puppies". If that were true, how would any woman have ever been made queen? Everyone might think that the puppy is cute, but if a bear's about to attack you, you probably don't feel the need to sacrifice your life for the protection of the disabled puppy. Women were for most of history considered to be the more moral sex, not naturally inclined to vices (unless coerced, think of the phrase "soiled dove", the man soiled …
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:19 PM
1

All jobs need should be high-paying... oh except for those dirty yucky jobs that men do, those should be lowest paid because women won't do them.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:40 PM

(about the female gymnasts) "..men love watching them, boys want to date them..." I don't want to speak for men, but I don't think they do either of these.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:28 PM
1

What's funny is that even though a man's chest, biceps, and abs aren't sexual either, they clearly are being sexualized by these women.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:36 PM
5

I think it always comes down to the idea that men had to be praised in order to get them to do certain things, i.e. "men are more intelligent and logical than women, that's why they need to work and women shouldn't" as well as "men are stronger and braver than women, hence they need to go to war". Women can't accept that these statements were merely the carrot put in front of the donkey to get him to pull the cart for you, they somehow believe men should have done these things while at the same …
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:35 PM
4

"Abuse rates are equal, the murder rate is not." The murder rate from domestic abuse of women is 100 women per year (2 per week, cited by feminists). This would hardly necessitate 1,500 women shelters in the US.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:13 PM
1

Men do the jobs that women won't do. Men normally take on the arduous chores because women are weaker and lazier. How is this different from what I said? I suppose I could have worded it as "men frequently do the jobs that either no woman can do or no woman wants to do", but if it's men who are doing it, then the implication is already there. The options for sex we have today have always been around: prostitution, even pornography. It's hard to say if sex robots will become the norm because they…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 06:01 PM
6

Flipping the gender. We view men as actors, people who do things, and we view women as objects, people who have things done unto them. The best examples of this are how female criminals are viewed by society. A mother kills her five children? "She is not at fault, it is society that places too much expectations on mothers." We would never feel that way about a father who kills his five children.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 05:23 PM

Both men and women find certain aspects or acts or interests of the other sex to be annoying, stupid, obnoxious, and generally incomprehensible. Most men are fine with this, but it seems women are incapable of hearing any kind of criticism of their sex, hence they view the "right" kind of treatment of women to be pandering to them, placing them above men in word and deed. Two factors that may play into this: Women will always be seen as essential to the human race for their reproductive abilitie…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 05:12 PM

Women say they would like to be objectified in a financial way, as they see it as reflecting their personal success. But I can only imagine the blog posts we'll then read about the poor women who finally realized "My husband was never actually attracted to me, he just wanted me for my money."
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:19 PM

I agree, but if the genders were reversed, feminists would view Eve partaking of the apple only after Adam did as coercion on his part. And how many women would get off or a lighter sentence because they convinced the court that they were only acting under their husband's orders?
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:11 PM

Only after Eve did.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 02:41 PM
2

Because men always had to meet the demands of women to have sex with them, and women's demands usually revolve around him placing her on a pedestal in comparison to other women (i.e. demonstrating his viability for a long term relationship).
/r/MensRights08/08/16 05:47 AM

Actually, from the religious point of view, it would be Adam sacrificing his estate in paradise (despite having done nothing wrong) for Eve because she messed up and he gave it all up to be with her. I always think about how this would be portrayed if it had been the other way around: noble Eve sacrificing her place in paradise to be with Adam after he messed up. You know feminists would be all over that.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 05:40 AM
3

It's because no one, not one feminist, talks about taking away the social mandate women have always had to hit a man if he says or does something she doesn't like.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 05:29 AM

Really, really great job. The only suggestion I might make is looking more into explanations of the past, such as: Before women could vote, they were still able to exert political power by petitioning the government. Examples include the Custody of Infants Act and the Tender Years Doctrine, both brought about by women. Even in the 1600s, women made a petition to the government against men drinking coffee because they claimed it made their husbands impotent. If anything, it shows that women did f…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 05:16 AM

What no one wants to admit is that women "objectify" men in other ways than just the way they look. If we think of "objectification" as finding something about someone attractive without knowing anything about their personality, women objectify men all the time by being attracted to their wealth and status.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:00 AM
2

Most feminists claim 2 women die from domestic abuse every week. But that means 104 deaths per year, which is comparable to the annual deaths caused by icicles in Russia.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:43 AM
1

Yes, she was just "trying to spark a discussion". The famous feminist tactic.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 02:40 AM
21

Women want the ability to dress sexily in order to attract a high status male, but at the same time have any lesser males "know their place" enough to not show any kind of interest in her or appreciation for her sexiness. They also show an extreme lack of sympathy for men by never noticing the requirement of men to still dress formally in formal situations.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 12:10 AM

I'm going to guess this is mostly about the type of books being written. Erotic romance novels and chick lit are booming writing sectors largely authored by women... but it's all crap that doesn't deserve a review in a paper.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 05:04 PM
1

Yes it's crazy how many people honestly believe women receive the most violence across the world. Or, if you point out that men do receive more violence, it's still seen as "Well, that's their own fault." The Syrian statistics are the most shocking to me. On my facebook feed, all I see are posts about the poor women of Syria, yet when I looked up the stats, the women die far less than even children, and both of those are far, far less than the civilian men. https://plot.ly/~ebooth/85.png
/r/MensRights06/08/16 03:57 PM
1

"Well, most rapes are committed disproportionately by men against women so Title IX is fair and equitable when it recognizes that." How about: "Well, most homeless people are disproportionately men, so charities are fair and equitable when they recognize that."
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:56 PM
3

I don't think they're necessarily eating the fingers and toes of males, just chewing them off. This is noted by DeWaal who, as far as I have seen, has studied them the most.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:58 AM

"Junior looks away, crossing a bent leg over the other, lying back nonchalantly like a starlet reclining on a poolside lounger. But Lolita persists-far longer than most human females would flirt with an uninterested man...Suddenly, Lolita grabs Junior's testicles." http://www.jessicaseigel.com/articles/bonobo.shtml Of course it's not sexual assault when a female does it. Those female bonobos aren't using intimidation (particularly since they're at the top of the social power structure) to coerce…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:32 AM
4

There were a few articles that acknowledged female violence, but they were always portrayed as in response to "evil male aggression". Aaand that somehow makes it 'girl power-y'. "Aggressive behavior could be anything from a male trying to mate with a female to a male bonobo feeding on a tree that a female bonobo has claimed as hers. It's a broad definition of "aggressive" behavior, but that doesn't seem to make a difference to the female coalitions. If one female in a coalition attacks a male, n…
/r/MensRights04/08/16 02:22 AM
4

This was awesome. Looking at over 300 court cases mainly in the 1700s, the author looks at how women perceived the laws of coverture and whether the precepts stated in the law really applied in common usage. She surmises from the cases that: -women frequently felt that they owned property, particularly the goods, money, and land that they brought with them into the marriage. This was their basis for feeling entitled to money as widows, rather than the idea that they had exchanged sex and obedien…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 05:36 PM
6

Theon Greyjoy never even raped anyone, he was just careless sexually (using girls for sex while knowing that they would become pregnant). But that, according to his punishment, is the worst of his crimes, even more than having two children killed. People don't applaud a man getting his dick cut off for killing children, they applaud it when they feel he's been "irresponsible" with it.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 01:07 AM
4

If you can stomach it, watch the last episode of the first season of Outlander (a Starz show very popular with women). There are some extremely graphic scenes depicting male on male rape, which makes the Sansa scene (or any rape scene in GoT) look like a video of puppies romping. Besides, most violence in GoT is male-directed and is shown in far more graphic detail than the female-directed violence.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 08:53 PM
2

You can disagree with how the core objective should be achieved. Most feminists believe a certain course of action needs to be done in order for gender equality to be achieved, such as 50/50 quotas in government and high positions or generally equal outcomes between men and women. Not everyone agrees that that is how gender equality should be achieved. Likewise, most people believe in world peace. Many fanatic religions could claim that as their objective, yet their methodology to achieve it is …
/r/MensRights01/08/16 06:45 PM
2

This is my biggest problem with enthusiastic consent, particularly being made the standard for what we define as rape: it doesn't matter. If a woman wrote about how she did consent and it was oh so enthusiastically and she made it completely clear... but really, in her head, she was saying no. Without saying anything at all, he made her feel pressured to have sex and she just wanted to be "that girl" who was totally cool with it. But really, it was all an act. If that sounds like a legitimate tu…
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:57 AM
3

I did write this blog post about it in a female-friendly way, I asked one of my feminist friends her thoughts on it, she never responded... I suppose that means the argument's points are too good she could only ignore? https://truegendertheory.wordpress.com/2016/03/10/the-only-way-to-destroy-a-patriarchy/
/r/MensRights01/08/16 12:49 AM

Most feminists like to say that our entire world was "constructed by men for men". They would cite things like: non-automatic maternity leave for several months or years long. And that this should somehow not affect her career at all (not every woman wants a 6 month or year long leave specifically because she would rather devote that time to her career) -That being focused on your career rather than a work-life balance is rewarded. (Nevermind that most women reward men who focus on their careers…
/r/MensRights31/07/16 09:52 PM
1

Absolutely right on her controlling him. It's all about why he's "raping" her (really it would be called strongly seducing). Think of Christian Grey. He has to have her because she's so beautiful, so amazing, so bla bla bla. It's all about her driving a perfect alpha male (one who has slept with so many women before and they never mattered to him at all) absolutely crazy with lust (and hidden love) that he would stop at nothing to have her. And his sexual skills are so mindblowing that it could …
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:57 PM

If their argument is that women do deserve special privilege from men simply because of their biological childbearing capacities, then men deserve special privilege from women because of their biologically superior strength and lack of childbearing capacities which enable them to work without needing to take long absences (and also make them the more likely choice to be sacrificed in war and dangerous environments).
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:19 PM
11

She highlighted the actual reasons why women have always desired chivalrous behavior from men: "it means he really likes me". From the female viewpoint, she is in a position of power wherein she gets to see just how many things he's willing to do for her, money to spend on her, curb his behavior to suit her. The man who can do that demonstrates how much hold she has over him, therefore showcases his suitability as a long-term "partner". It's a power trip on her part, like a puppeteer.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:21 PM
9

"In addition, women make less money than men and therefore are often less likely to be able to finance their relationships themselves." Sounds like you should be ensuring you only date someone of the same economic means as you then doesn't it? In the defense of gender equality at least. If you're going after a man who makes more money than you, that's a power imbalance and you don't want that. Or if you can't afford something yourself, don't expect someone else to pay for it for you. If you woul…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:04 PM
1

It appears from my studying of the history of citizenship that voting is tied to military service, at least as far back as ancient Greece. Although mandatory military service might have been incurred before that, it does seem like that was only demanded of citizens, not slaves (in ancient Greece). "The Greek sense of citizenship may have arisen from military necessity, since a key military formation demanded cohesion and commitment by each particular soldier... The idea of citizenship, then, was…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 03:18 AM

You're right it's not directly tied to voting; I thought you were implying that males don't have to sign up at all. Although it sounds as if back when the draft was being utilized including WWI, not registering would have revoked voting rights, as well as incurred prison times and even execution. I suppose you can say the inequality for voting stipulated more ways that men could lose their right to vote than women did, something which feminists never address.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:22 PM

"Under current law, all male U.S. citizens between 18–25 years are required to register with Selective Service within 30 days of their 18th birthday." "As an alternative method of encouraging or coercing registration, federal legislators passed laws requiring that to receive financial aid, federal grants and loans, certain government benefits, eligibility for most federal employment, and (if the person is an immigrant) eligibility for citizenship, a young man had to be registered (or had to have…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:10 AM

"This included military service, including in both World Wars, when men would not only lose the right to vote, but likely be imprisoned or executed for refusing to serve." Interesting, yes there was no comparable way for a woman to lose her right to vote than already applied to men, but additional ways that he could lose his vote. I would have liked to see female civic duties talked about by suffragettes, ones which a woman could be fined or jailed for refusing.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:51 PM

Ah yes, I had remembered seeing this quote and had tried looking for it. So the basis of the draft is that it is contingent to the precepts of a (male) citizen?
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter