TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ArtemisMinion1 Archive

View 8 posts and 225 comments by ArtemisMinion1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think it makes way more sense that people like to feel special and included.. So especially if they are in the minority, they want as many people to fall into their category as humanly possible. Victims want other people to consider themselves victims so they don’t feel like they are the only ones. No illuminate required.. Here specifically, if cleopatra is part african and jada is part African. Well then jada might be special like cleopatra was?!?!
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/23 06:35 PM
7

A drama wouldn’t matter, but a documentary?!?!
/r/AntiFeminists20/04/23 01:01 PM
5

Naw… it is literally the opposite. Not every women obviously, but the majority of the ones that do were dating them.
/r/AntiFeminists08/04/23 08:57 PM
1

I’m not so sure we can’t change the system.. it won’t be easy , but it can be done.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/23 08:28 PM
3

I definitely think we could have had our cake and eaten it too… An admittedly terrible saying, but you get the point. 😂
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 06:01 PM
5

Nah I’m on the “we need a return to traditional relationships” end of the spectrum, not the Andrew Tate “get your money up so you can take advantage of the dynamics of modern dating.”
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 05:58 PM
2

Every wave advocated against DV which is a good thing, but they also pretty much destroyed the family unit to protect what was alway a cost minority.. Call me crazy but I think we could have protected DV victims and not destroyed the family unit.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 04:46 PM
12

TikTok and other SM sites are full of 40 year old women crying because men are no longer offering a commitment.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 04:17 PM
14

That is sexual attention, not relationship attention. Lol Women always fail to recognize the difference.. just because he will sleep with ya’ll doesn’t mean he will wife you.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 04:15 PM
2

A big chunk are fundamentalists and conspiracy types.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 02:35 PM
2

Absolutely
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 02:32 PM
3

So better than the people who are trained and have years of experience doing that very thing?? Doubtful, not to mention the socialization..
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 03:16 AM
4

Every school is about obedience and indoctrination in how to be a better citizen. In every era and in every culture. Lol
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 03:14 AM
2

I would bet anything that no mattter what TPTB of the movement were after women heard “equality” and decided for themselves what that meant for them in every wave… It is just shocking to me that every wave went with the “I don’t need a man” route and none ever went the “why aren’t we picking good ones” route.
/r/AntiFeminists30/03/23 03:09 AM
4

Well being real how many people are actually qualified to teach their kids at home??
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/23 11:45 PM
14

Just FYI even first and second wave feminism were pretty terrible if you do any digging. It has pretty much been a “and men are terrible and must be destroyed “ since the start. Not that everyone who claimed feminist meant it that way.. just concerning the stated goals and such of all the founders and big wigs.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/23 11:43 PM
28

I disagree… It ruined women , they just don’t realize it til they hit the wall and no one wants them romantically anymore.
/r/AntiFeminists29/03/23 11:38 PM
1

HA!!!
/r/AntiFeminists18/02/23 11:44 AM
3

Yea it probably is…. Do more attractive people do better in pretty much every interaction with people, business or personal??? Yes.. Does make up make someone more attractive when applied correctly?? Yes…. It is common sense things like this being played off on discrimination that has given feminists a bad name.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/23 01:14 PM
8

Shocking?!?! More attractive people get favored?!? In other breaking news, water is wet!
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/23 03:33 PM
0

“Meeting online has become the most popular way U.S. couples connect, Stanford sociologist finds. Matchmaking is now done primarily by algorithms, according to new research from Stanford sociologist Michael Rosenfeld. His new study shows that most heterosexual couples today meet online.” https://news.stanford.edu/2019/08/21/online-dating-popular-way-u-s-couples-meet/ How about Stanford.edu https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/yk4mnh/8090_of_women_only_date_the_top_1020_of_men_and/?u…
/r/ExRedPill14/02/23 02:44 AM
-6

If someone is going to debunk an argument, it should actually be an argument someone is making, correct? That is the actual argument RP types are making. If it is a flawed argument then debunk away.
/r/ExRedPill14/02/23 02:37 AM
-1

You would agree that if someone is looking to deconstruct an argument, it should actually be the argument being made by the other side, right?? Rather than something that is being twisted and is not actually an argument anyone is making?? If the argument is wrong, then deconstruct it. PS if the arguments are not factual than you should probably have a better counter for them than “nah uh”, right?
/r/ExRedPill14/02/23 02:32 AM
-5

It doesn’t matter that there are more women than men on dating apps because, let’s assume there are 100 million people on tinder , for example and only 20% are women. That is still a study with 20 million women as it’s sample size. Which would make it for sure the most women ever polled on any subject. Concerning the study where men agreed on which women were the most attractive, that is totally irrelevant because though they might recognize the top 20% are the most attractive. I’m sure they als…
/r/ExRedPill14/02/23 02:28 AM
1

A) you have never actually watched any red pill stuff yourself have you? Lol Unless we are talking about an escort, or the guy is in the top 20% of men women actually pursue, it is incredibly hard for men to be promiscuous… Literally 30% of men above 18 have not had sex in the last year… Literally no one red pill or black pill would ever say it is easy for the average guy to be promiscuous… B) the base claim is common sense… Those who were cool with their mate being promiscuous would have a bett…
/r/ExRedPill14/02/23 12:02 AM
-15

A) dating apps are the primary way most people meet today. So that inherently makes it an excellent representation. B) actually it is making the exact opposite claim. That women are very good at figuring out who the best men are in a group, but very poor at deciding what men they actually qualify for. Aka if your an average woman then obviously a top 10% guy is probably just using you for sex. C) they sure coalesce on the same top 12% of men. So that would seem to be pretty much in agreement.
/r/ExRedPill13/02/23 08:48 PM
-1

The influencer bubble and pointing out the hardships of dating from the male perspective.
/r/ExRedPill13/02/23 05:58 PM
-2

As an example, “believe all women” would sound like something most feminists do not actually adhere to and is more something that is just being used to attack feminists, but then like almost every feminist group on the planet came out in support of Amber Heard AFTER THE TRIAL. So in practice where is the case where most feminists have gone after a false accusation by a female.
/r/ExRedPill13/02/23 02:44 PM
1

That would go for both sides.. I almost never see RP talking points being correctly represented. Every claim should be able to be tested, but I think if someone is going to deconstruct an argument, it should actually be the correct argument..
/r/ExRedPill13/02/23 02:40 PM
1

What part of each side do you disagree with?
/r/ExRedPill13/02/23 02:37 PM
1

No one has claimed any absolutes lol…. It is claiming that if there are 2 guys who are clones, except one is taller. The vast majority of women are taking the taller clone.
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 06:55 PM
1

Fair enough if you didn’t say they were telling men to cheat. I misunderstood. However, I totally disagree “they are permitting men to cheat” is a real thing. ..meaning that internet influencers do not allow individual adults to do or not do anything, on any subject.. Everyone is accountable for their own actions.. I listen to countless podcast on a hundred different subjects and I have seen the biggest of RP types specifically tell the average guy he cannot get away with cheating and her stay u…
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 06:51 PM
-1

No one said they are 6ft only.. They put in a slider that the majority of women set to 6ft plus.
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 06:31 PM
1

That is only sad deflection… I reply when I have time and/or don’t have anything better to do. I have never once claimed men were smarter than women. Your just reaching because of a lack of an on topic rebuttal. I Just point out stats to back up things that are common knowledge.. mine is the mainstream position. Your the one claiming that all the world is wrong because you feel like it should be.
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 06:27 PM
1

A) There are oodles of unattractive celebrities and the unattractive male celebrities still all have gorgeous supermodel level partners, while if you look at the unattractive female celebrities they are with very average looking guys. B)actually I am usually referring to cave man days and before. C) I have posted oodles of studies and such and they all only point one direction, but I shouldn’t have to post studies for what is common knowledge.
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 02:27 PM
1

They are explaining why both sexes view sex diffidently, not telling men to cheat. It is just a fact that men and women view sex differently and that is based on biology. Women get a dose of oxytocin when they orgasm and men do not, because evolution programmed women to fall in love through sex, while it did not program men to fall in love through sex. That is why a lot of women have problems when they attempt to have casual sex. It was an evolutionary advantage for women to fall in love with th…
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 02:17 PM
-1

Not 6ft only.. they did studies on alll the dating apps to come up with the stats.
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 01:46 PM
1

I would bet my paycheck they are talking about “high value men” or the differences between the sexes when they do cheat.. Not telling men to cheat. There is a big difference. Concerning the fact men and women view sex differently is just biology/evolution based on the fact women carry the kids, and pregnancy is so time consuming,expensive and risky.. You might as well be mad men can pee standing up.. Really that should mean that it is even more important when a guy chooses to be monogamous, beca…
/r/ExRedPill11/02/23 03:00 AM
1

Kinda… but so few men are even remotely capable of that so it is about the same as most men wanting to be astronauts… sure it would be great but it is so unrealistic no one is expecting or putting work towards that goal.. Most men operate on what is probable not what is a million to one possible. Which is why we don’t mind settling down with an average woman.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 10:39 PM
1

Sounds good… If women in general did not care about social ranking, then every male celebrity on the planet wouldn’t have 100 extremely attractive young women at in their DMs at any given moment… and they are…..and those are the women who could have anyone they wanted, and they choose to want people with status. Also, concerning women not liking the men who simp for RP gurus.. Women really tend to have a distain for the men who simp for them… you ever hear how women talk about the guys who buy t…
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 10:27 PM
0

Most red pill influencers have wealth and status and are beating women off with a stick.. Not for being RP gurus, but just like every other male celebrity is. They also do not really advocate for cheating. They suggest that men “keep women on their toes” by staying attractive to other women. So she doesn’t get bored and think they are settling for someone no other women want. They also warn women that if your going for someone with wealth and status that kind of man is likely to cheat. They 100%…
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 06:03 PM
-1

I google it and a dozen studies and articles pop up because in the most cases it is common knowledge things. On average of course: “Women prefer taller men” Men prefer younger women” “Women are hypergamous” “Men rank physical attraction higher women” Those things are common knowledge and shouldn’t even require a study… Or really it should take a study to show those things are wrong because they are the default position.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 05:40 PM
0

We only have studies or anecdotal evidence, and studies obviously trump anecdotal things.. Today we have a mountain of very accurate ways to find out. Dating app data for example where people have no reason to lie because they seem anonymous and have no idea they are being studied.. I would love to see the study saying pair bonding species prefer same their mate to be a similar size as I would assume all animals prefer to have bigger mates, because bigger means “better protector” and bigger offs…
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 05:34 PM
1

That is still probably very high. 80% of women only swipe right 5-15% of the time. So just mathematically that is a lot. That said i am just going off the raw stats of dating apps. I have been in a relationship the last couple years and have done very little tinder and bumble personally.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 05:27 PM
0

I don’t know you lol.. I am pointing out that being attracted to taller men is almost a universal thing for women, so there is no reason to tag a negative psychological trigger to it.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 04:55 PM
0

Women on average only swipe right 5-15% of the time.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 04:51 PM
0

Maybe you are insanely attractive… But look it up.. 50 matches a week is off the charts.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 04:47 PM
1

That sounds like black pill. Black pill are the ones who think they cannot effect the outcomes and red pill are the ones who think they can make more money, work out and learn game and increase their options. Game/charisma/a smooth operator, whatever you wanna call it..
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 04:46 PM
1

I am talking about the average, not you specifically. Individuals like all kinda things. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201909/5-reasons-why-women-and-men-care-about-height?amp “A study on women and men's height preferences found that women are most satisfied when their partner was 8 inches (21cm) taller. Men are most satisfied when they are 3 inches (8cm) taller than their partner. Another study found that among men, 13.5 percent prefer to date only women shorter than the…
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 04:31 PM
1

“A study on women and men's height preferences found that women are most satisfied when their partner was 8 inches (21cm) taller. Men are most satisfied when they are 3 inches (8cm) taller than their partner. Another study found that among men, 13.5 percent prefer to date only women shorter than them.” https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/after-service/201909/5-reasons-why-women-and-men-care-about-height?amp
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 03:38 PM
-1

Anything is possible, but It is probably subconscious. It would t be so overtly common and apply to a lot of perfectly stable women as well. Girls being turned off by men shorter than they are is probably like an 80% of the population thing.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 03:09 PM
0

Men don’t care about height on average, unless your just crazy tell them it is a negative.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 03:05 PM
0

That is an insane amount. Like a top 2% or higher amount You either must be ballin, amazingly attractive or your capping.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 03:04 PM
0

Is it game or wealth and status?
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 02:10 PM
1

On average men like a woman shorter than they are as well. Celebrities have wealth and status which would actually be evidence that women favor wealth and status over the traits that makes someone physically attractive, like with height. You see short and ugly male celebrities with super models all the time. You do not see ugly female celebrities with male supermodels..
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 02:09 PM
-1

It is probably evolutionary , not insecurity.. A bigger guy meant he was hypothetically a better protector and that meant hypothetically bigger offspring, which would have an advantage in caveman days.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 02:03 PM
-1

It is almost certainly the majority of dating apps wouldn’t have bothered adding it.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 02:00 PM
0

It isn’t dating apps who want to do it lol.. Dating apps cater to women because they know the men will follow, no different than a club/bar letting women in without a cover charge. So that means the vast majority of women wanted to filter out short guys.. Wasn’t a real uproar?? Add a weight option that both sexes can use and watch the ladies flip their wigs.
/r/ExRedPill10/02/23 01:59 PM
2

It is probably a symptom of women valuing physical attraction less and guys trying to get laid and lying.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/23 06:59 PM
1

1) First off I do not buy for a second that most couples are within 12 months of each other.. the math against that would just be astronomical.. the average age of first marriages in the US is like 28 or 31 presently, I forget which. people are not getting married right out of high school anymore where that might make sense.. people are meeting in the workplace and such where being the same exact age would just be random chance. 2) women have always valued physical attraction less than men.. you…
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 06:17 PM
1

First things like attraction and sexual orientation are lizard brain programmed in by biology, not cerebral cortex decisions. Evolution works over 10s of thousands of generations not over a few decades like with cultural stuff.. so it comes from cave man days or before, not the 1960s forward. Besides women don’t get to decide what men are attracted to IN GENERAL , just like men don’t get to decide what women are attracted to. On average, Men are attracted to youth and beauty just like women are …
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 01:54 PM
1

Lol your the one leveling personal attacks and sad deflections, but it is my feelings that were hurt… Suuuuurrrreee…
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 01:34 AM
1

First off people do not age overnight.. it slowly happens over years lol.. so at 27 they are still at their peak.. hypothetically, they are 5% less attractive by 28, 10 % by 29, 15% by 30, etc.. 1) fertility rates.. by 30 90% of the eggs are gone and by 35 it is geriatric pregnancy. 2) beauty.. very free peoples would claim they were more attractive at 35 than they were at 22. 3) less baggage and trauma.. less broken hearts, kids, less crazy exs that might show up. Etc.. it is not hard math. 4) …
/r/ExRedPill06/02/23 01:32 AM
0

I doubt it because that would be totally illogical.. It makes perfect sense.. The vast majority of men would never raise their hand to a woman , even if she attacked him first. The rates of DV come from a relatively small group of repeat offenders who beat up every partner they have. While if a man attacks you then you are supposed to defend yourself and retaliate. So it makes perfect sense that same sex couples would have a higher trade of Dv because society expects for you to retaliate against…
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 10:47 PM
1

That is the proposed beginning of the decline in options.. The claim is reality really hits about 35-40 and there are countless social media videos and such of women that age coming to that realization. From what I have seen what RP influencer types are saying is not to waste the period when you have the most relationship value on “hot girl summers” and chasing bad boys, but to leverage that value on securing the best mate you can. Rather than waiting until someone has less relationship value an…
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 10:41 PM
2

You are grasping and having to resort to personal attacks and totally irrelevant arguments.. aka someone without a rebuttal who knows they are losing the debate.. I am a 41 year old construction worker who makes 80 grand a year doing extreme sport construction. So am in just outstanding physical condition in a long term monogamous relationship with a very attractive GF in her early 20s, Who’s son I am helping raise. Who bangs my brains out every other night like like it is her job to do so. And …
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 10:35 PM
1

Women do not bar me from sex lol.. That is a personal attack as a deflection.
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 07:55 PM
3

This was just a deflection not a rebuttal, I do however detest men who lay their hands on women and think they should be removed from the gene pool.
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 07:34 PM
1

It is called google… all the vast collection of humanity’s combined knowledge is at everyone’s finger tips.. Of course there are plenty of terrible stats for men.. far greater crime rates, etc. Those things are not however addressing the topic.
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 07:32 PM
1

A) https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-29994648.amp https://ncadv.org/blog/posts/domestic-violence-and-the-lgbtq-community Violence among lesbian couples have the highest rate of domestic violence. B) in general what is the first thing a woman will call another woman in a confrontation ? C) the red pill claim is that a woman’s DATING options begin to decline around 25-27 and every time I have seen that said they specifically say “their relationship value to men, not their value as a human being. D…
/r/ExRedPill05/02/23 07:19 PM
2

The point of RP in this department is that women only want to be approached by the guys they want to be approached by and take offense to being approached by anyone they do not want to be approached by. When from the man’s POV there is absolutely no way to know what category you are in before hand. That they IN GENERAL do not want to have to do the approaching, but then get offended when someone they are not attracted to approaches them. Which is kinda a fair analysis concerning the women who ge…
/r/ExRedPill02/02/23 06:45 PM
1

Which is not strange because your hanging out with people in your very narrow field. Lol
/r/ExRedPill01/02/23 01:56 PM
1

You are absolutely an exception not a rule.
/r/ExRedPill01/02/23 03:19 AM
1

I don’t know if it is the majority, but they go into those fields at higher trades than women.. It should be the minority of both groups getting student loan debt for fields that will probably never pay for your loans.
/r/ExRedPill01/02/23 02:43 AM
1

Is it smarter to operate on what is possible or what is probable?
/r/ExRedPill01/02/23 02:23 AM
-1

Your moving the goal post. Every job site says the same thing. The average is 40-60k As of Jan 23, 2023, the average annual pay for the Bachelor Degree In Psychology jobs category in the United States is $54,734 a year. ZipRecruiter Bachelor Degree In Psychology Salary - ZipRecruiter The median salaries of psychology bachelor's, master's, and doctoral/professional degree holders in 2019 were $50,000, $60,000, and $90,000, respectively.Nov 1, 2021 American Psychological Association Datapoint: How…
/r/ExRedPill31/01/23 03:55 PM
-1

My pleasure.. “As a psychology major graduate in the USA, you can expect to earn on average $40,858 per year or $19.64 per hour. Zippia Average Psychology Major Salary: By Location, Industry, and Company - Zippia”
/r/ExRedPill31/01/23 03:36 PM
-4

But you are probably the exception and your career is probably not in liberal arts lol.. I agree a lot of those stats are inaccurate, but one person who beats the average doesn’t debunk it. Psychology, social work, liberal arts degrees probably will not pay for someone’s student loans.
/r/ExRedPill31/01/23 02:58 PM
0

They are probably mostly true, but look at how skewed they are.. A tattoo is body mutilation?!?! How are they getting the stats on herpes that is not showing symptoms?!?! “Useless degrees” rather than a probably low income degree.
/r/ExRedPill31/01/23 02:53 PM
1

Go to the gym and make enough money to support a family.
/r/ExRedPill31/01/23 02:02 PM
1

Um, yes humans are absolutely just a hair smarter animals…
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/23 04:50 PM
1

That is not what I mean lol.. Birds evolved not to have penises at all and the mainstream option is that it is because lady birds didn’t like them.
/r/AntiFeminists30/01/23 04:25 PM
6

Which makes her the problem… What if she looked in a crystal ball and knew he was the best she was ever going to get? Think she would still be unhappy? The expectation of “true love” and being perpetually happy is literally only a concept that is 80 years old. For the rest of human history it was about duty and “who will help me build the best family unit” and your personal happiness was very very secondary. So it was inconceivable to leave someone who was a great man and father.. A lot of time …
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/23 01:36 PM
-4

Become a good protector and provider..
/r/ExRedPill30/01/23 10:48 AM
6

If he is a great guy and yet still gives her the ick. The problem is with her.. You don’t break up a family for your own happiness. Marriage is not about your happiness.. It is about duty and who will help you build the best family unit.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/23 10:47 AM
1

Grown men who get laid are not controlled by sex… Take sex away from us and it is a totally different animal. But I am talking about a far grander scale.. Don’t get me wrong, it would be very hard to get every woman on board to do anything, but if the fact you were a pedo/rapis/domestic abuser/fill in the blank meant no woman who knew that would ever willingly touch them again., all of those things almost totally disappear inside of 3 generations (60 years)…we wouldn’t have to wait on evolution,…
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/23 02:43 AM
0

But women who did have good fathers ass still attracted to the same traits as women without a good father.. now they probably do a worse job of distinguishing between good tough guys and bad ones, but the same traits are generally attractive to all women
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 10:11 PM
1

Attraction is a lizard brain thing , not a cultural thing.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/23 10:06 PM
1

That is true for every species where the female cannot just be pinned down… The reason some bird species do not have penises is because female bird didn’t like them and have to “consent” to breed and didn’t like them for some reason. It is simple biology for every living creature.. whoever controls access to breeding can shape the species in anyway they choose just by not breeding with anyone with whatever undesirable trait.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/23 10:02 PM
-2

It isn’t because she hasn’t experienced it. It is because it is evolutionarily programmed in.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 07:58 PM
1

They have unrealistic expectations and probably have no idea how to be a wife..
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 07:44 PM
1

Yes…. It is the buyer who decides your value in that department.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 07:44 PM
1

Is he willing to marry you after a year??? Then he is out of your league.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 07:41 PM
1

Stable and healthy relationships are by definition boring.. happiness is not supposed to be perpetual. It is a treat. For both parties. Duty and putting your family unit first is supposed to be the glue, not happiness or even love.. Thinking you need to be in love to marry is like 80 years compared to all of human history.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 07:38 PM
0

It is evolutionary programming. Before civilization and kinda the modern era without a provider make you and your offspring starved.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 07:35 PM
3

The confusion happens because the same traits that make someone a good hero also make them a good villain and people get confused about which they are dealing with.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 07:34 PM
3

Biology.. women are programmed to be attracted to good protectors and provider’s because ya’ll carry the kids and our programming comes from caveman days or before. Not from cultural stuff.
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/23 07:32 PM
-2

FOR SURE, men will be whatever is required for us to get sex… if they require commitment, monogamy, brig GQ, money.. not be rapists or domestic abusive… Whatever is required.
/r/AntiFeminists28/01/23 07:28 PM
1

Yea I think we are at a weird intermediary place where they still get the benefits of being property, but without the penalties of being free and independent. Not that that is their fault , but more a symptom of change.
/r/AntiFeminists19/01/23 06:39 PM
4

No women are a privileged group.. not in the past, but presently. Feminists kinda have a bad rap atm
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/23 09:26 PM
2

That if you knowingly do things with a really high chance of going terribly wrong, then you don’t get to act surprised when things go terribly wrong. Ya gotta own it and take accountability.
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 06:45 PM
2

When it all goes terribly wrong
/r/AntiFeminists15/01/23 06:34 PM
2

It is and should absolutely be your choice, but when you do something with a better chance of failure, you don’t get to act all surprised about it..
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 09:59 PM
14

It is the equivalent of a woman hooking up with an ex con who has a history of DV and cheating.. Sure it is possible he might change, but he probably won’t..
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 09:52 PM
2

The person you choose as a partner is LITERALLY the most important decision anyone ever makes..
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 09:50 PM
3

So is hooking up with the wrong woman lol… People have survived jumping off of cliffs as well… That is one of the differences between most men and most women, lol.. Women operate on what is possible, not what is probable.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 09:49 PM
6

Of course, but it is also up to you if you want to jump off a cliff.. still doesn’t make it a good idea. Lol
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 09:30 PM
3

Yes…. Unless they want to stop valuing us on our future. Lol
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 09:29 PM
2

Of course.. the concept that only a member of whatever group can comment is ridiculous.. someone might be an expert in that field or just have a good idea.
/r/AntiFeminists14/01/23 02:08 AM
1

The op is just a cool story an extreme version of the attitude most men wished their wives had.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 06:11 PM
1

The OP or reply?
/r/MensRights12/01/23 06:09 PM
1

Women. Could 100% end rape, domestic violence and pedophilia if doing so meant no woman would ever knowingly touch you again, and it doesn't take 3 generations.. Ps I am not saying it is fair or their problem to fix, but it would work.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 05:58 PM
-2

I assume it will all even out.. women are adjusting to the freedom to have casual sex without risking pregnancy and the ability to leave and get paid for it. Evolution is over tens of thousands of generations so it can't keep up with the pace of societal change, but usually the best results will float to the top and become the ideal.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 01:59 PM
1

Not a rebuttal... if your right you could defend your position, if you cannot defend your position you lose.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 07:37 PM
1

No it is validating terrible logic.. Instead of them making the argument that their logic is ridiculous, they make the argument, " your ogic is good, so let's go after X woman who did the same to a man." That is validating their terrible idea. Which is the worst possible thing we can do.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 05:49 AM
0

For sure, but as I said earlier if you point at someone and say " he sexual assaulted this girl in high-school. We want it to mean he is a terrible person above redemption not that he grabbed a girl's butt without permission at drunken party. We need bright red lines thar seperate the things that matter and are likely to leave permanent scars from nonsense that was slightly in convient. It validates the ridiculous feminist tactics if we just do the same thing to them in reverse.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 02:46 AM
2

Then how come all you have is childish personal attacks and sad deflection s lmao??? Hmmmm? You act like you are not the one spouting personal attacks to avoid the fact you have no rebuttal.. My argument is not an emotional appeal, it is a math argument. It is very simple.. when you put very different things in the same box it will not only make people take the less serious more seriously. It will also make people take the more serious in fraction less seriously. If I say " he sexually assaulted…
/r/MensRights07/01/23 10:53 PM
-2

Obviously you have no rebuttal, so you lose.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 10:36 PM
1

That is a primary component of what makes you black in America... if you never had to experience that, you don't deserve to play the victim for that... But I really think she didn't even find out until sdulthiod..but maybe I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 08:56 PM
-16

Why have we added things like butt grabbing to SA?? So people will take it more seriously because you put it in the sane box with things like rape, right?? Don't you realize it will make people take the more serious things like rape less seriously too??
/r/MensRights07/01/23 08:24 PM
2

This is from memory, but either she didn't even f8nd our she was part black or maybe it was saying she didn't hear a thing about it until she started dating a royal.. I'll double check when I have a min.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 07:12 PM
2

That would be like my white self claiming u was black after I found out I was 2% from ancestry.com lol
/r/MensRights07/01/23 06:55 PM
6

Absolutely.... she has never had to live as bring black nor faced any discrimination like a black person in America would, but now wants to claim it like she has...
/r/MensRights07/01/23 06:53 PM
-48

OK? No..... Should it be called the same thing as a football team gang raping a cheerleader?? Absolutely not. Using really broad words is just ridiculous, especially with the stakes involved.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 06:01 PM
-45

How about we all stop pretending nonsense is sexual assault?? We can't bash chics for over hyping sexual assault allegations then do the same?!?! Using sexual assault should be reserved for the cases that could have been permanently scarring not continuing to expand it to basically everything imaginable.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 05:45 PM
4

She for sure went on Oprah and insinuated the royals wouldn't let their kid be a prince because he was " mixed race" when it was a 300 year old law that established all of that.. Plus she us like the least black person in the history of AAs... lol And my long term live in GF is Wesley snipes , raised in Memphis black.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 05:36 PM
-2

No I do not think that, but do not think it should be In the same bag with rape under the umbrella of sexual assault.. Sexual assault should only be the things that are likely to cause permanent scarring ah la rape.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 05:02 PM
1

That is not a rebuttal... In the transhood documentary that is in no way a conservative hit piece the LGBT gender affirming Dr. They go to clearly states that it is the case the RX is not intended for chdren and there are zero studies done on the long term effects. I am liberal as they come without being a shill.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/23 04:48 PM
4

There are no puberty blockers... there is a castration medication used for it now
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/23 03:34 PM
1

I would be leary of this story.. not necessarily that a crazy person is willing to sacrifice their kid out of spite to hurt a parent or for clout, but I doubt seriously any medical professional would help her do that before the kid was ATLEAST late teens.
/r/AntiFeminists07/01/23 02:54 AM
1

I'm betting this is fake
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:50 AM
1

I bet it would if he has a disability or something.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:47 AM
-1

That sounds fair, though I would be shocked if it is applied fairly.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:46 AM
1

Sure.. except for the double standard. Life doesn't care about fair. It only cares about what is and the whole dynamic is not changing for Dana White's @$$.... You need a figure WAY more sympathetic than him, though... maybe some guy in a wheelchair or something.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:43 AM
1

Yup.. which just makes him even dumber.. though obviously he did not go full force or anything.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:38 AM
1

Mgtow?
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:41 PM
1

I don't know why we are skipping who broke into who's house first.... lol
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:40 PM
5

They don't realize how cheap and accessible an escort actually is.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 06:52 PM
0

Obviously when it comes to a physical altercation with a male, yea. It is pretty flipping similar to fighting a disabled male.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 01:29 PM
-13

If someone in a wheel chair punches you and you punch the. Back your getting canceled too.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 12:09 PM
6

Get an escort... message me in private amd I'll tell you the website and rules silly.....
/r/MensRights06/01/23 01:35 AM
0

I would.. there Is a finite amount of time and effort that can go into making change, use it where it counts
/r/MensRights05/01/23 05:28 AM
-2

I don't care if the weaker sex, more likely to be attacked by rapists and robbers gets to park closer.. Never fight a battle with nothing to win , sun tzu
/r/MensRights05/01/23 03:47 AM
1

I personally consider that irrelevant. Of course it is kinda sexist, but a non-issue... I care about automatic custody to the mother and belie e all women. That matters.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 09:19 PM
1

Pearl just destroys people
/r/AntiFeminists04/01/23 04:14 PM
1

Your allowed to punch up, not down.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 02:00 PM
1

That is not cutting...that is substituting. Cutting is when you add some cheap substance like baby formula to a drug. To make less into more. No one has ever done that ever. Plus I'm not at all sure fentynal is heaper than heroin. Oxy, for sure, but I don't think it is cheaper than dope..it wasn't when I was getting high.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 09:29 PM
1

In my experience, and I have been out of the game for a decade now but it was not cheaper than dope.. cheaper than oxy maybe but not H.... No one uses drugs to cut drugs lol that is an old wives tale.. you have to pay extra for that, unless they are trying to date rape drug a female or something. The point of cutting something is to make more money, and an opiates addiction will happily take fentynal instead. To drug addicts I is the stronger and cheaper the better.. Maybe a rich person might be…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 08:58 PM
1

Not really, see opiates are a crazy drug. You can build up a tolerance that would kill a dozen people, and you won't even throw up, but it leaves your system VERY quickly hence the insane withdrawals. So even just a couple days without can cut your tolerance down to a fraction of what it was. This us anecdotal for sure but I spent 5 or 6 years chasing the dragon while fentynal was around and it was almost way a tolerance thing. Either noobs, people who had cleaned up or were for Ed to detox due …
/r/MensRights01/01/23 08:08 PM
2

I saw the video when it dropped, and yes I can fault him for not talking, just like I fault female abuse victims for staying in physically abusive relationships because " but she was in love". Emotional appeals are on the thousands of years old list of logical fallacies for a reason. We need to stop putting feels over reals and put reality first.1
/r/MensRights01/01/23 06:04 PM
3

Those are the vast minority, not the average. Most opioid overdoses come after people clean up and their tolerance goes down. The. They start getting their life back together and get little money in their pocket and decide to get high one more time, but t GG ey do the same dose they were used to taking and ..... done. I also doubt many people do suicide by car, just because their is no way to be sure it does the job and will probably be very painful.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 05:52 PM
1

That was Browns fault for not telling his side of the story in 2009... That said the physically dominant party always has the option to leave the situation, because the less physical party can only leave if their attacker let's them and I think that matters.. If a guy in a wheel chair punches me, I don't have to go full bore on him. I'm still the one in control of the situation.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 06:42 AM
2

I personally think a man should do the least he has to to "win"/protect himself versus anyone who has zero chance to beat you, that said he just now told his story and chose to take the L rather than blameshift it. So it isn't a surprise everyone assumed it was more one sided. That said he went way to far Amy way you look at it.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:36 PM
0

The old monarchies were falling and the power vacuum left, plus the printing g press allowed for countless new ideas to become widespread that would have been squashed by the old establishment. It is human nature to only care about the things that hurt you while ignoring the things that help you.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:30 PM
8

If it isn't socially acceptable it cannot mainstream.. lol Now for sure their were times and places where it was "your right to do so", aka nor many people would do anything about it, but your neighbors still considered you trash for doing it, unless the infraction was considered monumental. Similar to someone who abused their pets in America before their were animal abuse laws. It was your dog to do with as you wished, but everyone who knew considered you trash for doing it.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:20 PM
6

A couple videos does not make something the mainstream societal opinion lol.. that is like me saying the western world agrees with the Westboro Baptist church.. Everything I have seen, even from ancient history has considered it garbage if you beat your wife, even when it was your right to do so, the rest of that society considered you garbage for doing it.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:05 PM
-17

Exactly... there has always been large groups of people who thought women should be equal and class and caste systems are flawed. The crazier ideas on the left are not majority opinions like the crazier ideas on the right are, because the left is a compilation of dozens of groups that all have different and often conflicting goals. That acts as a filter because group A is not going for group B's nonsense. The right is, for the most part one group with the same goals. So their craziness is fairly…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:01 PM
13

In what way and in what circumstances?? That could be anything... Where are these videos and is thar the mainstream opinion of that society as a whole? Muslims do not have a pope.. so a couple clerics saying x,Y or Z is not proof it is the mainstream societal opinion.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:47 PM
9

I don't think that is correct... you got a source??
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:32 PM
1

Male bonding is not gonna replace female sexual attention lol
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:18 PM
1

The only way to slow porn consumption is for men to get laid regularly. The only way to do that is sex work,but the old fashioned kind.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:18 PM
7

This is only because men are bigger risk takers and opiate addiction is a medical addiction , not a willpower thing.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:14 PM
20

Beating your wife has always been considered a garbage thing to do, even when it wasn't illegal to do so. AKA it has never been considered manly.. similar to beating up someone with a disability.. it is manly to do things that are hard to do.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:13 PM
-23

I'm quite sure that feminism pre-dayes Marxism lmao
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:10 PM
96

Because destroying is always easier than building.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 08:09 PM
3

That is far more believable than theOP.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 01:06 AM
2

I’m betting it is a fake story.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 01:05 AM
-4

This is a nonsense story.. I bet it is totally fake. People are not raped by a white/black guy then claims it is the opposite race.. people cheat and then claim rape to cover up the affair.. If this ever did happen it would be for racist reasons. She thought it was more socially acceptable to be raped by a white guy.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 01:04 AM
2

I’m not big on emotional appeals and instead just look at the base math whenever possible.. plus I’m 40 and still like sex with hot 20 year olds. It is very easy and safer than you might think once you learn the rules. Just Google “escorts in (your city)”. Anyone asking for a deposit when you are coming to them assume is a fake account.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:38 PM
1

Learn how to do the escort thing and it takes all the pressure off finding someone RIGHT NOW. So you can take your time and be choosy.. Plus it takes away the ability for someone to use sex as a weapon.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 06:35 PM
1

A) Obviously both sexes can be emotional.. on average though women are far more emotional than men but there are always exceptions. B) Wars are not fought for feelings lol they are fought for land, resources and who gets to be in control?!?? C) if you are with someone who might kill you, they are the danger to you.. there is always the chance you could slip and break your neck , whether you stay or go. So staying with a dangerous person is compounding your risk. ESPECIALLY, for a female in the m…
/r/MensRights21/12/22 02:33 PM
1

It will depend on not allowing the wack a doodles to take center stage and professional types with good arguments making the cases.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:15 PM
1

She wouldn’t have to if she was the wife when they made the deposit.. her name is on the account and they are not gonna check.. it is your job to call and have the sample destroyed after you divorce if you know you set up the account.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:03 PM
1

If she is the one who logged it in then yea… the sperm bank is not gonna spend the time and money to see if your still married lol
/r/MensRights20/12/22 08:01 PM
1

I spend an hour or 2 day talking to my college age daughter on phone who is in her second year of nursing school at a private liberal arts college.. we have a wonderful relationship and she has been a flawless kid… She has been so good I have spent her whole life waiting for her to break bad because she was so perfect and never did.. How many college age women spend an hour plus a day talking to their father on the phone?!?? Almost none… I’m 41 with a very attractive 25 year old live in girlfrie…
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:08 AM
1

Nah I’m just not a weak B who needs to exaggerate what kind of person I am, just like I’m not a weak Who needs to threaten random people online because I don’t have a rebuttal… 90k a year is not a small paycheck… if I was lying I would go higher.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:29 PM
1

Because I get paid 90k a year to do it and to be fair, no one else is willing to pay me 90k a year to do anything.. which puts me in the top 20% of earners if not higher… but I personally love the exercise and like living life in “fresh out of prison shape.” So does my very attractive 25 year old GF. Lol When you stop exercising you fall apart physically and Father Time kicks your @$$. Legitimate tough guys don’t play keyboard warrior online lol.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 10:25 PM
1

Such a tough guy , but you get beat up by a woman on a regular basis… you made my day cupcake. I’ll be giggling to myself all day.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 07:29 PM
1

BWAHAHAHAHA A KEYBOARD WARRIOR HUH!! I swing a sledgehammer for 6, 12 hour days a week doing extremes sport construction... if your not special forces or a trained UFC fighter you lose.. and in my experience only weak Bs play keyboard warrior.. Weak Bs who don’t have a rebuttal. 😘
/r/MensRights18/12/22 07:19 PM
0

Oh so can I play that same card after I murder my GF?? “Well mentally I didn’t have the ability not to murder my GF because she was verbally abusive”.. What about “I didn’t have the mental ability not to rob the person because I was detoxing off dope and I needed my fix”.??? That is why putting feels over reals is ridiculous.. emotions are not logical nor objective.. the world doesn’t care how anyone feels about anything. It only cares about what the reality is and pretending otherwise is not on…
/r/MensRights18/12/22 03:58 AM
-1

No your putting feels over reals which is a very female thing to do.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 03:00 PM
1

He is outstanding.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:35 PM
0

Garbage.. that is a sad deflection. Maybe I believe I cannot live without murdering my ex.. that is not a justification to murder my ex.. Emotions are not logical nor objective and pretending they are is both ridiculous and guaranteed to have a negative result. All of society should have a expectation the person leaves or it will never stop.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:34 PM
2

If there is video it is going to be self defense.. should police officers always assume the male was the aggressor?? Absolutely not.. but it is not the same thing when a 110lb woman takes a swing and when a 250lb man does.. that is ignoring the reals over feel, which is the entire problem with DV advocacy in the first place. We should be removing the feels from female DV advocacy, not adding the feels to Mens DV advocacy. There is never a justification to stay with an abusive partner no matter w…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 04:19 PM
1

I have been involved in abusive relationships and have never once laid my hands on a woman or chid in anger.. I have also personally been part of 2 failed interventions where a female was legit getting beat up and the family and friends where just shoveling resources and protection at them to get them to leave and they wouldn’t.. I don’t go in for people putting their feels over reals.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:34 PM
-1

No it isn’t .. self defense is always legal. If she lies and the state believes her that could happen with any thing. The “ it is ok she/he stayed because they love bombed them” is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:30 PM
0

Unless he left?!! Just like a female in an abusive relationship should’ve expected to leave.. it is ridiculous to play into the whole “ but he/she loves them so it is ok they stayed narrative. If there is a kid that is even more reason to leave and set up an alternative place for the kid to be?!?!? There is no justification to stay with an abuser longer than it takes to sneak away.. period, and it is insanity to pretend otherwise.. “Well I’m gonna let my kid learn it is ok to abuse them or be ab…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 11:27 PM
1

That changes everything.. if she has a weapon then you lose your agency and have every right to treat her like a man. Imho
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:25 PM
1

Fair enough
/r/MensRights13/12/22 04:01 AM
1

Hell no?!?! It is not a normal perjury and should be it’s own category ?!! That is like saying a rape is really just a normal assault.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:58 AM
2

But if the false allegations is worse than being raped, shouldn’t it have a bigger penalty?? Wouldn’t an attempted false allegation that didn’t stick be the equivalent of an attempted rape?
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:54 AM
1

That is what was being discussed lol.. what is the appropriate punishment.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:51 AM
1

Obviously… but you were saying it wouldn’t be ok to put false accusers on a sex offender registry because of the chance a rapist might rape them because they have zero credibility.. My point is the false allegation is worse…. Assuming it sticks of course.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:50 AM
1

Because there is no scenario where everyone decides to stop raping and falsely accusing people lol..
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:47 AM
2

A) I should have specified “the consequences of a false rape conviction would destroy you psychologically “. B) sex offenders are instantly target in prison by everyone.. any chance almost any prisoner gets you will be beaten, raped or murdered. So your prison sentence will be TERRIBLE.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:46 AM
2

You think people falsely accused don’t commit suicide? You think the consequences of a rape conviction will not destroy you psychologically?? What about the rapes, beatings and such they will face for being a rapist in jail?? Assuming the false allegation sticks it is worse in every way… If anyone convicted of rape had the option of being raped and getting to walk free and not be a sex offender and such , almost everyone takes the deal.. male or female.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:39 AM
2

My point is that a false allegation that sticks is worse than what the potential rape victim endured… no one thinks about it, but it is.. That is like saying we shouldn’t prosecute rapists because they might get raped in prison.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:33 AM
1

Obviously.. but that is not an option that is on the table.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:31 AM
2

Obviously both are terrible, but assuming the allegation sticks, it is worse than being raped… and rape is almost as terrible as it gets. But course we should compare the consequences of the false allegation to the consequences of being a rape victim to decide how to handle the situation.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:29 AM
3

What is worse?? Being raped or being falsely accused, losing everything, spending years in a concrete box as a rapist (they do not have it easy in jail) the. Being on the sex offended list and everyone thinking your a rapist FOREVER??? I’ll take being raped any day.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:20 AM
1

Here is the really crazy part… according to the FBI 8-10 of reported rapes are fake allegations!! That is crazy!! That dwarfs all other crimes when it comes to false allegations.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:16 AM
3

I’m not sure it is a total stretch, but that is the price you pay for falsely accusing people imho.. actions have consequences.. do things that ruin your credibility, and guess what?? You lose your credibility.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:15 AM
1

That is the same logic used not to penalize false accusers..” but what if it scares off real victims.” As a society we have decided it is worse to jail an innocent than let a guilty person go free.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:10 AM
1

Awesome!! It should be almost as big a crime as rape or DV…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:08 AM
-3

Call me crazy , and it is not ok, but I don’t think the law or society should get involved unless someone loses their agency.. If my 110lb gf attacks me I can shove her away and leave the situation whenever I want. If I attack her she can only leave if I let her.. We shouldn’t pretend it is ok to stay with someone who is physically abusive male or female.. and that is kinda what we are saying by playing into the DV victim narrative where they pretend it is not their fault they stayed… The abuse …
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:07 AM
1

Probably because I’ve been pimping out your mother… it is a crappy thing to do but she will take on all callers and I need the money… tell her I’ve got a gangbang set up later for her and your sister. 😘
/r/MensRights13/12/22 02:36 AM
1

Lol says the guy who has no rebuttal and instead had to go with a sad deflection and personal attack..😘
/r/MensRights12/12/22 11:09 PM
0

Suuuurrreee… Men are not attracted to beauty, youth , fertility and submissiveness and women are not attracted to providers,attention, height, status and wealth…. it is just a coincidence all the wealthy go for young beautiful women and do not care if they have wealth or status, and that women flock to celebrities and such…. Your hilarious
/r/MensRights03/12/22 02:55 PM
-1

Your forgetting that women get their relationship value for free and men have to earn theirs. We have to create our value they are just to protect their value, so who has the better deal again?!? Of course I can get women my age lol… they have less and less options as they get older and if you make enough to afford a stay at home wife/gf. Then you don’t care what she makes.. in fact the more she makes the less likely she is to help where you need it.. if I want her to go on a business trip with …
/r/MensRights03/12/22 04:43 AM
1

It is working for now lol. My GF is in her early 20s. Lol
/r/MensRights02/12/22 01:10 PM
1

Because they get less valuable as they age and you get more valuable as you gain wealth and status, but if your being honest then it is her bad.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:38 PM
1

Ditto
/r/MensRights30/11/22 08:11 PM
-1

Suuuurrrrreeee……
/r/MensRights30/11/22 02:40 PM
0

If you were married they don’t dna test you without asking.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:02 PM
-4

I don’t think it is legally rape, so it is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:37 PM
5

It isn’t rape..it should be illegal, but not rape. Make a new charge.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:26 PM
5

Idk about that… I was told there is no child support without a dna test when I offered to skip it during my own custody stuff.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:26 PM
1

No…. It is something terrible, but it is not rape… just like if you refuse to pay an escort after sex it doesn’t magically become rape.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:23 PM
1

If you want it to work it usually does.. If she is the bread winner long term it will usually turn to resentment and her feeling like she settled. Men are in general perfectly ok with paying the bills long term without ever losing respect for the stay at home mom.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:40 PM
1

Before recoded history it became a control mechanism, if it ever wasn’t. Well who was it made to control if it predates the haves vs. have nots?
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:38 PM
1

Maybe but at some point they started becoming a control mechanism.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:35 PM
1

There are always exceptions.. we all know a couple where the wife should clearly be running things, but those are exceptions.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:10 PM
1

Religion is far older and evolved a country Ike by the time of Abraham.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:08 PM
1

Of course it is to control people but it predates most of civilization.. can’t be the elites controlling the peasants before there are elites and peasants. So if it was created before civilization. Who was it meant to control?? Their emotional wives? Maybe.. honestly I am spitballing this is not my pet theory lol.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:08 PM
1

Not at all. Do most women operate on emotion?? Yes. And emotions logical? Yes… Was religion created to keep people in line?? Yes. Religion is also very old.. predating civilization
/r/MensRights23/11/22 07:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter