TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BDMR_lurker Archive

View 3 posts and 1,881 comments by BDMR_lurker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,881 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Archive. Birmingham City Council is now liable for over £1bn pounds in payments after settling an equal pay claim from women employed as cleaners, cooks and carers. Their pay was below men in comparable jobs such as bin collectors and road workers. [emphasis mine] Comparable in no way means similar, or even remotely so. I have been compared with George Clooney, meaning we can be compared, and thus are comparable, but it's always been to his advantage (although we are somewhat similar: same numbe…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:27 AM
14

We apparently don't need due process either... Remember, you are always "this man" to someone. It was OK when they came for the Communists, cause I wasn't no commie...
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:48 AM
2

Very true. Then again, as an old fart myself, the metoo thing feels so much like a repeat of the late '80s -early '90s. Remember when Disclosure came out, and pretty much put out for the public what any sane man at the time was thinking? This was around the time when "open door" became the default policy when working with a female (and by extension, everybody, so as not to look sexist or distrusting). Women at the time were already complaining about males not mentoring females, glass ceiling and…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:46 AM
11

France's supposedly top linguists are astoundingly narrow-minded. Maybe learning another language would help them spot the glaring absence in the one they're supposedly proficient at: there's no neutral form in French. They have a 'he' ('il'), a 'she' ('elle'), but no 'it'. They lost it somewhere along the way out of the Roman Empire. As a result, everything is gendered, simply because there are only two options. Also, they have a problem with mixed-gender groups, since they have to use either '…
/r/MensRights16/11/17 12:34 AM
6

they are not usually the same woman. They're one people under one law. Mandatory genetic testing at birth (both parents) would make things so much simpler.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:49 PM
16

Same people who berate Leonardo DiCaprio for not marrying? . Men owe us long before they even set eyes on us You go girl! Go sod off, that is.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 03:41 PM
26

Because someone has to do the job. When a firm targets people for promotion on the basis of gender and not merit, fewer people bring value to the job, making those people increasingly valuable.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 10:51 AM
9

I find it remarkable that I'm now unable unable to distinguish bona fide facists from the self-proclaimed anti-facists.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 10:20 AM
1

Far as I know, the legal age for a vasectomy in the UK is 18. In practice, most physicians will turn down an 18-yo, though.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 03:22 PM
24

It's actually more mundane than this: an episode of feminist pandering, which led to the creation of (if memory serves) a Ministry of Equality and Women, because there's nothing suspicious to an umpire wearing a team jersey (it has since been absorbed by the Ministry of Health), and in turn to over 100 extraordinary courts (Juzgados de Violencia Sobre la Mujer), which efficiently condemn men (obviously, never women), unfettered by due process and human rights. . Fortunately, Spain is already set…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:30 PM
5

We are so fucked.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:36 AM
12

Hence the paper. Believe it or not, there used to be a time schoolteachers weren't complete morons. And basic biology waits till 5th or 6th grade I think.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:58 PM
26

Egad! There was no actual blood involved, only paper, if even that. One kid would tell the class that his mother is A neg, his father O pos, and the teacher would be left trying to explain how the kid ended up AB pos.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:20 PM
92

Selection bias: at $100 a pop, this test is taken when there's already a healthy doubt. Or is it unhealthy? . There's been a rash of articles recently, placing the 'paternal discrepancy' risk at 4-5%. That's 1 person in 20. Think about it: when you ride the bus, there's a good chance at least one person there is not his/hers father child. Except if you ride empty buses. With 60 persons, there's a 95% chance that one or more is a bastard child (supposing yadda yadda, but that's the gist of it). .…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:22 PM
3

Nearly half of working fathers would like a less stressful job so they can spend more time caring for their children, a study has found. You mean working yourself to the bone to foot the bills while not spending time with your kids is not good enough for men? Seesh, there's no pleasing the shitlords. /s
/r/MensRights16/01/17 12:44 PM
3

Lurker: The open steppe, fleet horse, falcons at your wrist, and the wind in your hair. fengpi: Wrong! Crush your enemies. See them driven before you. Hear the lamentations of their women.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 12:41 PM
1

Well, yeah, not doing self-depreciation is a sign of weakness :)
/r/MensRights16/01/17 10:45 AM
3

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Do you have a link to that? I've found this that points to an even weighted severity between sexes (a bit higher for men), and this that tends to say young women hold their liquor better (unexpected).
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:59 AM
6

Take it to its logical extreme: let women fund and build these extra roads/lanes! For Great Justice! separate, pink roadways and lanes should to be funded and created by government to segregate men and women drivers Oh, sorry, they're just looking for yet another hand-out from the Great Daddy in the Sky. Has anyone ever seen a feminist looking for work, and not just money?
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:47 AM
2

I heard they even revoked Kayne West's Black license, so they're no real limit on discretionary exclusion with these people.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:43 AM
2

"The bill is very simple: Taxpayers should not have to be paying for classes that discriminate," Thorpe said. "This is drawing a line in the sand that says, 'Higher education: If you want to have classes that teach resentment between individuals, you should have to fund them.' " Common sense, and the reason the Left has to tip-toe to introduce racial quotas, sorry, "affirmative action" in education in (my part of) Europe (they still do on the sly): why would I, your basic tax-paying white male s…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:35 AM
5

Yep, been looking for my little boy, and found nothing from the 21st century. Oh well, we don't watch much TV anyway. It's actually more insidious for my little girl: I have to explain that she most probably never will beat the crap out of a hulking, 2-meter goon.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:21 AM
2

Can't work. Women marry up. Hence the husband is most often the biggest earner. Thus it makes no sense to slash into his job. Also, it decrease expected alimony.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:13 AM
2

Sarcasm coupled with (possible, not permanent) self-depreciation signals to humour; without, it's just smugness and judgemental superiority, as you point out. And often, it's not even clever enough to qualify as sarcasm.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:12 AM
11

Who the hell likes Friends?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 07:41 PM
12

Fat floats.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 07:40 PM
1

I think senators are a safe vertical distance from the law.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 12:16 AM
1

as stated, [...] as everyone is aware Reading you bores me to no end. Know-it-all attitude, no demonstrated knowledge. http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/775-confirmed-kills-one-picture-1945/ Yeah, well, this one guy by all likelyhood trumps their combined scores. Hard to confirm, he worked alone. The Russian sure registered their losses. Or this guy, less kills, but .50 cal? Stroke of genius. Twelve women, inefficient allocation of ressources, Häyhä didn't even use a scope. I wouldn't expect a lot…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 04:58 PM
7

In this instance, I'd take the chance.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:43 PM
1

Human mitochondrial (matrilinear) vs Y (patrilinear) genetic variability measures. Gorillas are a current example.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:42 PM
1

End of story. Actually, no, you don't get to decide you are right. 1/ Flawed study, granted. Still better than the arguments you put forward. Sadly, the Israeli won't compile male vs female statistics. Not PC, not the narrative. Same for Europe: being an older Euro, I got to compare male conscripts with female enlisted. Not pretty. Then again, these women were volunteers, so maybe only incompetent women try for the Armed Forces. 2/ I used a shooting range example because it's numerical and conci…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:38 PM
5

Jezebel has writers?
/r/MensRights13/01/17 01:52 PM
7

How much would it cost exactly to literally send them to another planet? I here Mars is beautiful this time of year (not being cruel and sending them to Venus). . Either way, I have a funny feeling that my nine year old daughter will choose to live her life the way she wants to live it, whether the Patriarchy or the Sisterhood likes it or not. Notice how feminists easily refer to themselves as the Sisterhood, whereas I haven't ever heard a man claim to belong to the Patriarchy (barring those bir…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 01:49 PM
14

Because justice stops where government expenses threaten to start.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:34 AM
3

"She absolutely under no circumstances wanted the victims and the family members of the victims to go through a trial. She did not want that," her attorney, Tony Coleman That, and she qualified for capital punishment in Oklahoma, so her good will may be a tad contrived.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:32 AM
3

Notice how they complain that men don't embrace feminism although 90% of women do not (80% in the US?)
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:23 AM
14

Quota-ing women into the good jobs has quota'd men out and into the bad ones, maybe? Or maybe the UK has pulled an Obama, who declined at the last moment to 'incentive' or 'stimulate' construction because it is typically male, and targetted healthcare, which was already doing fine.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:19 AM
1

Hate to tell you this, big boy, Hate to tell you this, big girl, but condescension is earned. despite all the supposed advantages you cite I'm not citing anything. Attempted strawman? The idea that somehow modern military victory is still predicated on the [yadda yadda] OK, let me sum up your arguiment: I, MagicTampon, quote a few random figures, which cannot support the other person's point of view. Therefore, I, MagicTampon, is right, because I, MagicTampon, cannot conceive how it could be oth…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 09:07 AM
2

There is no male disposability grounded in biology. As a species, we've spent >95% of our existence on the gorilla model, ie: one dominant male reproducing with 10 to 20 females. Losing half the males hurts, but doesn't affect the reproduction bottom line. Losing half the females is a catastrophe.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 08:32 AM
3

There's a real danger here, I agree.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 05:15 PM
3

Mattis's position is not voluntary vs. conscripted, it's male vs. female. We have little data on female conscription, but at least in Israel, the highly-touted 'lionesses' are mostly crap when compared to their male counterparts.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 05:13 PM
7

The bloke is basically saying he wants to win wars, hence wants the best soldiers, and women, well, they're not it. And yes, it's unfair, one half of the population is rewarded with survival for being on less competent in fighting; male disposability grounded in biology. But the military are about victory, not justice. As they say, if you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 03:28 PM
1

You are making my point. And not answering the argument.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 09:36 PM
1

Well, bell-bottomed shentis and sleeved, pleated blouses were all the rage under Nebmaatre Meryamun of the 20th dynasty. Unfortunately, no images survived the "Anubis take Disco" backlash of 1138 BC.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 05:22 PM
2

Nick Taylor received a $128 ticket for leaving his car running in order to warm it up—even though that's something absolutely everyone in Michigan does during winter. Roseville Police Chief James Berlin told Fox-8 News that leaving the keys in the ignition was a "public safety issue." Unless PC Berlin issues tickets for each and every citizen warming his car up, well, it sure looks like a discrimination. Except it's rather frivolous, unproductive if you expect to keep on living there, and expens…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 04:23 PM
1

Make me a burrito! (or is that too much white patriarchal appropriation?)
/r/MensRights11/01/17 04:15 PM
1

To be honest, what we called ancient Egypt spans more or less 25 centuries, so they must have gone through about all styles by then.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 04:13 PM
9

I served for about as long as her, in a very non-combat role, where I nonetheless once had to subdue someone. Using an assault rifle. A loaded rifle. They're totally right, every man a rifleman. This was a distasteful yet eye-opening experience, I mulled over it for some time, and a few senior officers went out of their way to have a beer with me and make sure I was processing things correctly, cause the Army is manly yet caring (especially you're considered undoutebly useful but not a 'real' so…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:29 PM
1

Officials say there’s been a spike in the number of hate-inspired crimes in New York since Trump was elected President. According to police statistics, reported hate crimes in the city more than doubled last month — with more than 43 cases, compared with just 20 in November 2015. That is simply splendid! They run a story about how 1 of these 23 'extra' cases is total bogus, and conclude with hence we should listen & believe. There is no reasoning with these people. And then they whine they are n…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 01:06 PM
2

We used to speak like this, a few decades ago. Measure the impact of political correctness. How about you, do you think that women are not suited for conducting business? [...] There is literally not a single worldwide recognised brand founded by woman. I thought L'Oreal was founded by its current 'owner', but no, it was her father. In China, I think many people won’t consider this sexist. [...]. For entrepreneurs, especially CEOs, a lot of people are going for pure aggressiveness, ruthlessness,…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 11:04 AM
2

Aren't dreads an Ancient Egypt thing?
/r/MensRights11/01/17 09:08 AM
2

And also because they are ignorant of the law, which is pretty much as inane.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 09:07 AM
6

What's your take on Marine & Family Programs?
/r/MensRights11/01/17 08:59 AM
25

I heard you can get PTSD from mosquito bites these days. Even from firing an AR-15. Heck, I probably got it and I don't even know. Seriously, the article plays up the military angle ("she seemed to be transitioning from her military life to civilian life well"), but they don't even mention her previous deployment(s). If any. Unless the USMC is very different, actual combat roles are a minority in armed forces. And women are a negligible part of these, as is <5%. Actually, a quick search shows sh…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 08:55 AM
1

A strawman would be if I attributed then again I did not denounce a strawman. you arrive at essentially one of the same arguments made by feminists No. My contention is that Parents publishes articles addressing mothers and children, but rarely fathers, hence the lack of male readership. The job-market equivalent would be that STEM fields (or politics) open positions for men (obviously not for children) and not women, hence the lack of female applicants.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 08:32 AM
10

My point. I actually agree with his reasonning, I just would rather have read 'people' instead of 'women'.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:32 PM
1

then it sounds like it would kind of behoove No it doesn't, but I distinctly hear the rustling of straw in your argument. Looking at Parents' website: I don't care about the 9 crazy ways my breasts change during pregnancy, or whether pregnancy-induced stress is harmful or helpful. As a man, I'm not really interested in a magazine geared towards women. Not unexpected. And yes, there are articles about child rearing. Without a single male in the pictures. Which is not the way I raise my kids, so, …
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:30 PM
1

And, according to manager Tom Kelly, a similar sign is also on display in the men’s toilets. Yep. Article written by a guy, who quotes the women's sign, but didn't go to the men's room to check out his own and can't quote the safewords...
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:52 PM
1

Actually, women in Europe seem to be getting the idea that they too will get the shaft, and not in a nice way. At least a significant fraction of them. But even these are looking to men to fix the issue. As Bill Burr says, no feminist in a house fire, it's instant pigtails-I'm-a-girl.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:42 PM
0

The opinions of people who don't think they need it are irrelevant. Yeah right. Only those who have X get to decide on X. Not the way it works. You are wrapping yourself and 'the staff' up in unfounded authority, that will land said staff in trouble more often than not should they act like you describe. Which actually would be a good thing. Then again, maybe things are different where you leave. My countries has laws.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:34 PM
32

Full quotes: 'I hate sending to prison women who have not been to prison before and who have been convicted for the first time of a criminal offence. 'I think it is an offence that crosses the custody threshold, the question is if that should be immediate or not.' 'If you have done your best to pay it back I will suspend your sentence.' 'You will continue on bail until 17 May and I will suspend your sentence depending on your performance.' Looks like he's trying to do a decent job (and avoid car…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:55 PM
4

Until campuses are over-run with Women Studies majors, noone knows how to maitain machinery anymore, and the West reverts to the godd 'ole days, which were bad for most everybody.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:23 PM
5

Videogames never claimed to be inclusive, it's an explicitely segmented market. Whereas Parents usually means father & mother. . And to answer your question, sexy women covers usually attract a male audience, so no, obviously, I wouldn't say the same.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:20 PM
1

The assistance being offered by the bar is not just to call the cab but to verify when it is ready, silently alert the patron, distract the date if necessary, and get a bouncer to escort the patron to the cab. All of which can be achieved without secret codes, cloak-and-dagger. If police are called staff the staff need to know what is happening and what both parties look like, If the stafff doesn't already know, they have to hear from the woman. Making them not witnesses, but peddlers of hearsay…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:15 PM
6

Catholic realises most male characters are Homer Simpson while females are Wonder Woman. Feminism is a zero-sum game, because it doesn't produce. Their value has to be taken from someone else. Women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 10:37 AM
1

The heads of it were always radical They were always in for the gain, not the pain. My mother believed in feminism. Because she never understood it. there were rights women lacked I'm no spring chicken, and yet my mother never had less rights than my father. She actually has a few more. Now they've achieved their more reasonable goals, and the radicals remain in power. This works as an excuse for Adolf, Joseph, Benito and Mao too, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 10:24 AM
3

I think he's making 2 points: A minority (I hope) of women are actively hostile to males, in an attempt to grab as much as can be grabbed, while the rest is complacently neutral to slightly sympathetic. This will very likely create resentment from men toward all women for the coming decades, especially considering governments have lost a lot of their grasp on official history. a society cannot survive giving half its members rights without duties, ie: privilege. It's just too costly, and will ca…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:58 AM
3

TL;DR: Pope Francis is OK with babies crying and mothers breast-feeding in the Sistine Chapel during Baptism. Not really shocking in Europe, more controversial in the US.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:31 AM
2

The problem with viewing "oppression" through the lens of identity is that eventually you're going to end up with new "oppressed" groups. Actually, this is pretty new. We used to have (true or not) "oppressed minorities". Fucking white males are the effective majority demographics in the Western world. New and dangerous, probably.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:21 AM
4

Then again, maybe there's a reason they don't attract male readership...
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:09 AM
6

From another thread: if you're in the restroom, call your own ride or police. This is virtue-signaling, pushing the implicit assumption that only women can have 'bad dates' where 'he is not like his picture'.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:02 AM
1

Happens in Iran. Low expectations.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:59 AM
4

Well, candy crush can cost about the same.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 07:40 PM
3

From the pics thread: If you are already in the bathroom, just call the uber from there. Or a cab, or a cop. Seriously.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:32 PM
9

For those claiming this is gender-neutral, courtesy of Google image: St. Petersburg restaurant wants to help women escape bad dates That's the bold headline on a discreet sign in the women's restroom at the Iberian Rooster restaurant in downtown St. Petersburg. [emphasis mine] Full article, in all its pandering, virtue-signalling glory. Also references similar initiatives in England. All geared toward women only. Because, as a man, when your "Tinder date doesn't look like her picture" [dixit], y…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:29 PM
2

In the women's room.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:21 PM
19

Let's see it this way: Crappy Ghostbusters flaunted its open misandry, and grossed $229m worldwide, losing Sony at least $50m. Will Passengers bomb at the box-office? It cost $30m less, and in not even 3 weeks, it has already outgrossed Crappy outside the US. So no, probably not. Maybe producers will realise that shitting on half the population => bad for business, while displeasing the raging 5% => not a fuck given.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:48 PM
3

70 to 80% of family spendings are decided by women, so there's no real need to reach out to men. Except maybe for purely male-oriented products. And even then, I think (don't watch much TV) shaving cream or deodorant ads picture single men, usually attracting women.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 11:30 AM
1

The "progressive left" doesn't make policy on freedom of speech. So I don't know why you care what they think of it. Because I live in Europe, where almost every country has laws restricting freedom of speech. Inciting a panic, for example, [...] You also can't threaten to kill anyone Because it's not speech, it's action.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 10:16 AM
2

I'd get my left hand surgically-bonded to a flame-thrower and my right hand attached to a chain-saw And then you shave with the chain-saw, in total acceptance of your male chauvinist badassery. Still leaves the issue of shaking after you pee, though.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:46 AM
3

One of my pet peeves: racism, sexism et al. are Constitution-guaranteed rights, and freedom of speech first and foremost protects speech that I find abhorrent. Except for the progressive Left, where freedom of speech is freedom to agree with me or be destroyed.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:44 AM
6

Want ot raise successful boys? Raise boys, as opposed to the defective girls feminism is selling (although their girls are defective too, but that's another issue). Bonus points if they're exposed to 'successful' men, as in well-adjusted, not self-hating persons.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:39 AM
2

It's called an "ally". Except for the dildo part, where it's either a dildo or a burly male chauvinist at the bar down the corner.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:34 AM
6

... in Iran.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:31 AM
3

It's a scientific fact that a white man who doesn't bow to each and every single female hates all women. /s
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:30 AM
4

[PC] also helped strengthen the right wing. Well, it started off as a toolkit of thought-terminating cliches for the Left to use, and it ends up with people rebelling against the thought police. Who would have thunk? Actually, we have the same thing in Europe: a Left with its head so far up its own arse it's doughnut-shaped, whining that pointing out its failures is "strengthening the Right". Always somebody else's fault. Somebody else being white males, obviously, the scourge of humanity. A vic…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 08:24 AM
3

If feminism is cancer, is a prostate feminism trivial?
/r/MensRights08/01/17 09:43 PM
3

In fact some of the kinkiest girls were identified active feminists Seconded. Actually, (for me) these women managed to take the fun out of sex. Was too much like therapy / work.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 09:40 PM
28

We used to call these "bodice rippers", for a reason. The main themes are: women fantasize about having access to / exclusivity of one (or more) high-value male, ie: phyisically perfect, rich, assertive, but never fantasize about being able to attract such male. Hence unexplainable devotion from a man who could probably do far better. women deny agency. Women will denounce any woman open about her sexual (slut) and or social (gold digger) ambition, and shame her back into the accepted behaviour.…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:01 PM
9

And none of us said a thing while radicals did this. Next time someone says not all feminists are like that, well, we sure didn't do anything to stop this. That's the whole thing there. She's lucid about being an accomplice to a radical 'takeover', and yet, well, she's passively OK with it. Feminism never was taken over. It has always been a radical movement. Not a riot, just looters.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 11:57 PM
4

This and subsequent studies found that a husband’s “refusal to accept influence from his wife” — in effect, gaslighting — is highly predictive of divorce. The "happy wife, happy life" creed again. And no, this is not gaslighting. It's a good thing too, that the social expectation of a man becoming subordinate to his wife is made explicit. It should hasten the fall of current year's marriage and leave room for something better.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 08:12 PM
1

You are not welcome.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 05:19 PM
1

Actually, it's called spelling, and it predates Nazis.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:50 PM
32

It's a good thing, and I hope justice is served, mostly meaning the university and the professor pay through their noses. Then again, only the most egregious cases of personal vendetta are taken to court, and this will probably not deter the basic, day-to-day misandry of the education system.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 11:20 AM
34

Can we please stop the vast, bottomless stupidity that is HuffingtonPost? Oh, yes we can (although I may be a tad late with this catchphrase). . HuffPo protesting #NotAllMen while maintaining the #AllWomen are victims. Because permanently insulting half the people you meet has never, ever turned them against you and your ideas.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 10:07 AM
1

In any case, I did have a chuckle over this: Funny, but mostly true.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:40 AM
2

Equal pay implies equal work. Unless Zambian women don't insist on equal pay.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:35 AM
2

Well, white males actually are the all-singing, all dancing crap of the Western world. Palahniuk describes the disenfranchisement by society of the people it's built upon, and a reaction, ie: Project Mayhem. It's not representative of Men's Rights Activists, who basically think society can be fixed and made fair, but it's not so far from other ways of thinking, eg: improve yourself and enjoy the decline. Also, Fight Club is somewhat light-hearted and positive (albeit in a very twisted way), whic…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:28 AM
35

Penis envy is real.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 08:48 PM
2

Legitimate question, and hard to say, there being so very few women in the military, and them being less identifiable in civvies (no high and tight for example). Then again, yes, some of our females have had trouble when walking about town in their greens (on the job), coming mostly from non-indiginous, bearded men whose peace-loving culture did frown upon women in "men's jobs". Different hatred from different people, but same result.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:01 PM
8

Virtue signaling at its finest. Coming from a moron who apparently bases his 'manhood' (I'd rather use 'masculinity') on a shirtless pic and kindergarten-level threatening user name... Funny really, to reference Malcolm X and write like an Uncle Tom. I don't feel emasculated by feminism. Feminism is just one more hate creed, but with members too lazy or inefficient to cause an actual threat. Men pandering to an ill-perceived, over-estimated feminist population on the other hand, have passed laws…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 01:55 PM
19

‘Happy wife, happy life’ is a maxim that is backed by research and has saved my own marriage. Despite a few half-hearted, last-paragraph words to the contrary, this looks rather one-sided. Saving a one-sided marriage makes sense for only 50% of spouses... My immediate fear was that I’d lose my children. Losing Kate would mean losing them. The thought shocked me to the core. Oh yeah, men stay because the family court system uses children as hostages.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 11:43 AM
10

Not really men's rights. I served in another country and another century, and there has always been peace-loving, well-meaning liberal youngsters yearning for an outlet for their disdain towards the establishment and its overly (to their mind) conservative stance; usually, they would gang up on some unsuspecting, largely outnumbered young man, usually white, identified by his short hair or green bag, or in this case, Army vest, and dispense Social Justice on him. Then again, at the time, law enf…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 11:30 AM
37

Because it bears repeating: women can be sexist non-whites can be racist
/r/MensRights05/01/17 10:47 AM
5

A biological male who identifies as female [...] has not had sex reassignment surgery. some 25mins behind the men’s winner; What are the odds he just wanted a medal? Any medal. Let women sort this out for themselves, when they get edged out by 'self-identifiers'.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:51 AM
7

So, she writes that 80% of people are egalitarian, and 80% of people are not feminists. You'd think she could take the hint...
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:35 AM
5

This is advocating a race to the bottom, by acting the same as an abusive wife, eg: becoming complacently unemployed, throwing accusations of abuse. The sad thing is, I can see his point. When faced with becoming of wage slave for an estranged spouse than will turn your kids against you, fighting dirty is simply the logical step. Men hold back because they hope things won't turn too ugly. Except they do. Family courts make sure of this.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:32 AM
2

In TRP parlance: Trump is an agree-and-amplify answer to feminism shit-test. Not only, but being perceived as opposing the tyranny of political correctness probably didn't hurt his campaign.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:22 AM
3

Having worked (breifly, as an external contractor) in female-only offices (luxury goods and big pharma), well, the amount of bickering and office politics is insane. To be fair, the sudden presence of an external quantity, with some amount of authority, and furthermore male, is extremely destabilizing. Which makes it easier for said person to push his own agenda. Goes to show, "diversity makes a workplace more efficient" is very true. For females.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:18 AM
8

It really looks as though the Obama administration has been setting up an extra-judiciary sentencing circuit to try and circumvent that pesky Justice system. A political police. Title IX offices being about dogma, they won't ever convict a female. Or maybe they will. Just one, so they can cherrypick her case to demonstrate their 'fairness'. But their system can't be turned against them. About the only way to fight back I can see is to take matters to real courts as often as possible, and sue Uni…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:04 AM
1

Now ponder the reasons for banning Christianity.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 08:52 AM
1

Oh, and it's Colosseum.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 08:50 AM
2

You might want to brush up on your reading skills. And since you don't appear too subtle, I'm calling you a moron here.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 08:45 AM
1

Operative word: if. Don't.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:42 PM
1

Is your cheque in the mail?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:41 PM
7

Travis said, “There were a ton of people in the sports media who wanted Ronda Rousey to be good because it represented their belief that women are better than men.” Every now and then, a woman is so dominant in her sport that she wants to take men on. Then she gets plastered by a C-lister, and learns she's dominant only in the women's league, not the sport. And still they push the same bullshit. . I don't watch UFC, but I've seen the Rousey-Holm bout. My cousin's a fan. 30s in, I was telling him…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:09 PM
1

"Ally" is SJW short-hand for "slave".
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:43 PM
3

I sort of guessed from your user name ... but most people don't realise Quo Vadis or Ben Hur are historically creative.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:42 PM
6

And he will probably sign a few hundreds pardons on his last afternoon.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:38 PM
2

Same here. It's truly sad that "live and let live" is perceived as weakness and an invitation for any self-righteous moron to try and impose his way of thinking. The Romans probably had the right idea in sending these people to feed the lions. One-shot job, and you end up like crap.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:34 PM
7

Contrary to Hollywood "turn-the-other-cheek", martyrdom image, Christians have historically been quite comfortable with violence. On the other hand, your common SJW ... well, they're twice the apparent area of a standard silhouette target. Look to the US. Angry white men. Inbred rednecks. Deplorable racists. Well, maybe, probably not. But they do have all the guns. . In Europe, 'violence' will probably be social, with a (by European standard) far Right wave in the coming years (it may have alrea…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:31 PM
13

Don't we have facilities for this type of person? With doors that lock?
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:12 PM
2

Replying to myself: I'm apparently wrong. It seems that French women have historically voted less for the Left then men. And also that the French don't like their Left. Then again, they have a 'Socialiste' prez. Go figure.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:10 PM
14

This is not a women's rights issue: women already have equal rights in France. This is a 'rule of law' issue.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:45 AM
10

Funny thing is, these women probably voted for the government that has no issue with this state of things.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:30 AM
2

They are citing and showing places in major cities hundreds of kliks apart. It starts to sound like a shitty general situation.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:29 AM
9

The anger is real. 'Justice' is very much a male concept, being all logical and unflexible. Very mathematical, actually. So yeah, injustice. Much anger. And embarassment. This is actually covered by TRP. Anger is normal. But anger is unproductive. Now how you move beyond anger is the interesting part. Supposing you do. But Elam is right: things are better on the other side. . I warmly reccomend listening to Mr Elam's piece, and it reminds of another story. Freedom is also freedom from anger.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 04:37 PM
14

I know judges are morons, cops are dumbasses, and true justice can only come from headlines, but her successive trials apparently left both courts and juries very unconvinced of her ordeal. Reality is probably less tidy than the media narrative. (edit: typo)
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:28 PM
68

Read a little on this one, interested in the legal aspect. Apparently, the investigation failed to turn up any material proof of said abuse, including the beating she allegedly suffered just prior to the murder. Known anger issues, but no demonstrated violence, such as the sadly usual trail of bruises witnessed at school / by neighbours. Allegations substanciated only by the perp's daughters, who turned out extremely unreliable witnesses. On the other hand, the perp's violent behaviour is docume…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:20 PM
2

Head-of-state pardon is a fixture of many Western regimes, the US included. It's egregious here for being based in nothing but pandering. SJWs and the 'progressive left' are one step closer to getting away with murder.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 01:52 PM
1

So you actually agree, it should. No I don't. A history of violence cannot, and should not, be considered for a self-defence case. It can, and plausibly has, for a murder case.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 12:11 PM
1

Big fan of Mae West, but she didn't go down in history for her acerbic wit, cf. Mae West life preserver.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 12:08 PM
9

Tina Fey, Lena Dunham, Mindy Kaling, Abbi Jacobson, Ilana Glazer, [...] Amy Schumer Women, suffice it to say, are funny. Perplexing. . The author bemoans that men don't value humour in a woman, and argues humour in men from an evolutionary psychology perspective: funny often means smart, and women like smart in a provider. Well, I'll make it easy for her to understand 'evolutionary psychology' where it bothers her: except for maybe the last 1% of our existence as a species, women have born the b…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 11:48 AM
1

how much it should affect the results of a self-defence case It doesn't. She shot a man in his back and in his sleep. Self-defence is out when there is no clear and present danger. And even then, lethal force is only justified by lethal danger. Clear-cut case of murder. French courts should, as pretty much any Western country, take into account a 'history of violence', as an extenuating circumstance, which warrants a lighter sentence. Under burden of proof, which she has apparently failed.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 11:32 AM
12

Well, it's true. Then again, men don't owe a fucking thing to women either. At which point so many women turn trad-con.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 11:04 AM
1

Unless France has gone far down the drain, he can't erase the verdict. Trias politica and stuff. Then again, not serving is pretty much a pass. What does she care about a criminal record at what, 70? Hollande pulled a vote-courting stunt on a case that had already gone the full circuit without any blatant miscarriage. Media circus and pandering.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:41 AM
6

Some actually did for Thatcher...
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:35 AM
3

Actually, women should be allowed to revenge-kill their husbands. On condition of serving a few decades for aggravated murder. /s
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:24 AM
1

Condoning murder will be his legacy?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:19 AM
5

Actually, she was pardonned by their head of state, to the outrage of the justice system, which had repeatedly condemned her. Extenuating circumstances may mitigate the sentence, but it's still a guilty verdict; in her case, murder. Then again, Hollande has elections coming up soon... so hey, murder's OK if it's worth a few votes.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:17 AM
18

The Blues Brothers, philistine!
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:12 AM
5

TL;DW: lecture on "Why is Grievance Feminism a threat to serious Feminism?" I'd say because it has taken over. And it threatens society, which is a tad bigger than 'serious feminism'. Her discourse is not uninteresting but bland, and she really needs to not move her head so much when lecturing. Also, anecdocal and self-centered in the first part. Then again, she's a feminist. . Edit: apparently, Aussies want to replace 'free speech' with 'fair speech'. Read: policed, redacted. You may come to re…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 10:05 AM
46

She may well be the greatest (if not most humble) female player. Which is just as condescending as it should, because it's not the greatest unconditionally. I too am the greatest in a league barring anyone greater than myself. In her case, several hundred men.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:31 PM
126

Actually, they bragged they could beat any man outside the top 200, which shows they're not completely stupid. But both got trashed on the same afternoon by Karsten Braasch, then 203th male player. Still, more mobility, more power, more spin. And thus 203th player, period.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:29 PM
65

In case the comments get removed: . Woman: "I don't need a man to complete me!" Response by women: "You go, grrrl!" Man: "I don't need a woman to complete me." Response by women: "Whining, privileged, mysogynist, pig!" . Men just see women as sex objects. But also if they're not interested in sex with women then they're misogynists. Can't please feminists. Ever.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 02:55 PM
3

MTV loves money, and MTV thought virtue-signaling would line its pockets. Also, MTV thought it could get away with it. MTV withdrew the video when proved wrong. I'd say you know what to do, but seriously, anyone watches this? Huey Lewis was about as cool as they could get even back in the early '80s. . Still I'd say these kind of announcement warrants immediate boycott from white men, aka the biggest earning demographics. It's the financial equivalent to an angry mob: arguably moral, but efficie…
/r/MensRights27/12/16 09:28 AM
2

Depending what court one sits on, this can be a rather mild case.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 09:19 AM
16

We have to remember, she was only 17 when this happened. I don't think this girl understood the finality of death. Don't they do show and tell where she lives? Actually, there might be some truth to your claim. Hollywood death, no drama beyond plot point for secondary characters. Still, you're being overly romantic about this. She lost weight because she may be facing prison despite being blonde. Anyway, the judge will weigh redeeming her v. sending a message to all the Michelle Carters out ther…
/r/MensRights27/12/16 09:01 AM
11

Because they want, for political reasons, to hire women, but someone still has to do the job...
/r/MensRights25/12/16 09:31 AM
9

Think I'll put up a Christmas tree, then. . Archive Article itself a variation on "look at all the unpaid labour that women do". Woe is them. Author encourages women to go on strike for Christmas, let their men do the cooking. Of course, it's only a market problem. Are they willing to trade their chores for their husbands'? My wife isn't. Or do they want to saddle their husbands with all the work?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 06:56 PM
8

BBC: we have to admit there is some truth to this, as the ONS's numbers are public. But stil, mah wage gap.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 01:40 PM
6

Actually, the "fries before guys" shirt makes sense. In XXL. For the rest, well, feel free to boycott owner. Also, it's astounding some of these are pictured on men. I mean, who would wear a "man slave" apron?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 09:37 AM
2

Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state [...] spearheaded several programs to promote and protect women in oppressive countries, such as the Women, Peace and Security initiative This very much sounds like a gravy train at best, bribing money for foreign officials at worst. Obscure, unverifiable spendings. 8,327 hammers, left-handed: $8,000,000. And even if it's genuine, Trump's made it clear he was cutting costs and focusing on domestic issues. . The good news is, it would hurt the bigges…
/r/MensRights23/12/16 09:03 AM
2

I'm not sure anything he does can hurt him more in the media at this point. They've declared him literally Hitler anyway.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:32 AM
3

"Every man a rifleman"
/r/MensRights23/12/16 08:25 AM
24

Let's just hope their enemies cut them the same slack ...
/r/MensRights22/12/16 09:37 PM
2

Maybe, maybe not. Testosterone favours risk-taking, which encompasses both bad decisions and this kind of save.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 09:36 PM
3

With the chart topping off at 4 millions, I'll assume these are lifetime earnings. So you can factor in maternity leaves. And men working more years if memory serves.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:15 PM
28

Actually, it's good form to stow your penis before exiting the stall. Cause, unisex urinals? Fun, but recipe for disaster.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:16 PM
15

Because each and every single thing must be about women. On the other hand, any parent here knows any movie with a good, positive role model for a little boy? I didn't have trouble finding any for his older sister, but for my little monkey, I'll probably have to dig into the older catalog.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:13 PM
5

I guess the conventional answer is #NotAllMuslims? But seriously, not all gays! Fuck's sake, what with the homo caricature? I know the people on the picture really exist, but one can be gay without looking like a birdcage reject. Or be left-wing. I know, diversity advocates don't allow diversity of opinion. . Also, what's the men's rights angle? That they don't throw women off the roof? That they kill more men than women? Cause the rainbow-haired SJW crowd is by far the lesser evil.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:03 PM
1

Well, aren't jeans measured by waist and inseam, in inches/centimeters? Fact is, actually fitting clothes is a tad more complicated than just 2 numbers. But it would be a start. I vote for metric.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 02:45 PM
1

I have hypotheses, most implying that humans are crap. But basically, it makes short-term economical sense. North American divorce has grown into an industry, and it benefits from acrimonious divorces. Not unlike for-profit prisons, actually.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 02:39 PM
3

But why in your mind should only the wife be dependent Strawman. By definition, a non-working spuse is financially dependent. Unless independantly wealthy. You didn't fight hard enough. Or you fucked the maid. Next time don't be cheap on the lawyer. Oh, I see your problem (yes, it is a problem). I have this uncanny ability to speak about people other than myself. About 21% of American adults Source? This includes people who have married before WWII. Culturally different. CDC says marriage 6.9 pe…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 02:36 PM
2

The good news is that a tad over half cases are settled out of court. We just need to know what these settlements look like, ie: equal parenting or threats of DV allegations in court.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 02:16 PM
7

What part? How in 80% of cases, men are written out of their children's lives by court order? Actually, that's only for 47.5% of divorces that go through the courts, so 38% overall, but it doesn't mean the father isn't cut off by settlement in part of the other 52.5%.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 01:42 PM
1

I love how your mentality here so plain that it's now obvious that you don't want to discuss You are projecting and watching yourself type. she's exercising her rights as a free citizen and a paying customer I'll quote you: "it isn't illegal to be a fucking retard". Your point is moot by your own argument. They're "Creative" clothing sizes! "Creative" is often enough sarcastic (eg: "creative accounting") that I felt it potentially insulting to my reader's intelligence to point it out. Now I have…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 01:36 PM
3

It's a union Isn't a union the opposite of individual independance? you've never been anywhere near a divorce. I have. The hassle is highly assymetrical. A normal marriage is much less eventful. A normal marriage nowadays ends in divorce. why the fuck would you have a baby with her? Because, and it may surprise you, men want babies too. It's called a compromise, most people do this. You're under the very common fallacy that people are rational agents. Were it the case, this sub wouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:47 PM
2

Interesting article. Nowadays, 'populist' is just one of the many shaming words used by the left to describe those they disagree with. They tend to forget that Benito, Joseph or Zedung weren't exactly right-wing. Facism has no political allegiance.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:21 AM
1

Marketing is at core an anti-consumer practice. It aims at creating need. Creative clothes size are legal because they don't have such adverse effects as to warrant to time and ressource to actually regulate this specific market. It's legal because it's not even worth the effort of making it illegal.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:10 AM
14

More stable Depends what OS it runs on.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 09:40 AM
3

Reddit has been on a censorship overdrive since the_donald, with Huffman himself admitting to personnaly editing user comments, and bi-weekly 'tuning' to keep them out of the front page. A quandary, really: Reddit is naturally Left-leaning, but it makes money from free speech, which SJWs basically oppose.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 09:36 AM
7

People looking down from useless diploma femsplaining to the common man Dunham's God-given right to be a right cunt. My low-brow answer would be 'fuck you'. You don't get to define what is 'normal' to me. Personal judgement is this: personal.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 09:32 AM
13

Captivating article, from a psychologist's point of view. From a legal point of vue, the Duluth model assigns guilt without investigation. It bypasses any form of due process, and is the antithesis of justice. Oppression at its finest. . Regarding his own divorce: A number of the men warned me to “wait for the accusations of DV!” “There haven’t been any” I replied but they were not wrong and as soon as I applied for shared residence, the accusations of me being violent started. This being the ve…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 09:15 AM
1

Food companies are required by law to adhere to (vaguely) scientific standards, whereas clothing companies are not. Mostly because food is considered more important than labels on clothes. I've never heard of health issues due to label deficiency. And yeah, it's a con, but it's called marketing and considered legal.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 08:41 AM
1

My point. I can only speculate it's the only attribution model that produces a small yet significant differences between sexes, and thus a chance to publish. Ie: they're attributing the dead patients to male physicians to force the results. But I'm just being mean.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 11:41 PM
5

Oh, it's already happening. It's the inexorable rise of the 40-something, single, childless cat lady.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 07:10 PM
11

And that, my American friends, is the reason your higher education leaves you with 6-figure debts. Although you may not be getting your full money's worth here.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 05:48 PM
11

Author is disappointed because she simultaneously: convinced women are somehow better than men not blind to facts I am, and always will be, a proud feminist. Nope she ain't, not until she solves point #2. . Also, misleading title. She expounds on how she, as a woman, is sick of misandry, as all women should be. Not a word on male opinions. Men are purely objects, subject to women's discourse. I personally feel oppressed by her Matriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:15 PM
2

Haters gonna hate...
/r/MensRights21/12/16 02:07 PM
4

Reposting comment from other submission for this article: Here in Europe, by the end of the 19th / beginning of the 20th century, numbers were clear: it was far safer to give birth at home than at the hospital. 5 to 8 times decreased odds of either the mother or the baby dying. Why so? Selection bias. It was proper for a child to be born in his home, and mothers were rushed to the hospital only when the attending physician or midwife would start to panic. Hospitals were actually doing a decent j…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:26 PM
43

OK, my favourite example for this kind of studies. Here in Europe, by the end of the 19th / beginning of the 20th century, numbers were clear: it was far safer to give birth at home than at the hospital. 5 to 8 times decreased odds of either the mother or the baby dying. Why so? Selection bias. It was proper for a child to be born in his home, and mothers were rushed to the hospital only when the attending physician or midwife would start to panic. Hospitals were actually doing a decent job. . A…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 01:08 PM
3

Oh no, for a given woman, the "pool of marriageable men" diminishes over time, through matrimony, divorce-plus-unwilling-to-remarry, and death. And also because of competition with younger women. But I do agree that said pool is artifically restricted from the get-go. Women marry up to settle down.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 11:06 AM
11

Once they found out that I'm in a relationship, the behaviour changed. Be at least content that your friends are a better tier of women. You'd be amazed at the number of women who will 'play their cards' despite a man's wedding band. Sometimes for drinks, sometimes for sex (but drinks before).
/r/MensRights21/12/16 10:45 AM
2

She has a very important, and very true, message about women’s clothing sizes. Textbook first world problem?
/r/MensRights21/12/16 10:14 AM
3

Don't judge the baby. He is suffering and needs help.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 10:12 AM
2

Well, at least it would end.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:48 AM
8

drops mic Feminists dropped the ball before my balls dropped.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:47 AM
13

It's an important message for women everywhere: do not marry. Men are evil. Do everyone a favour. /s . I realised I had lost all control of my own situation and my independence. It's called marriage. Male POV: you're young, you meet her, she spends a lot but has a job. You marry. She stops working. She keeps spending. You're worried because kids cost a lot. She cries and nags her way through your paycheck. And one day she realises she can have the house and the money without the hassle, and divo…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:43 AM
11

ALL ARE WELCOME but some are more welcome than others
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:26 AM
2

Andrea Dworkin's theory in the early '80s, if memory serves, which is not guaranteed given the subject matter. One look at Dworkin clearly establish that any form of sex involving her is rape. Warning, unsafe link, Sanity roll required.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:00 AM
8

Of course not: so we will raise sons to love and respect women. Her disapointment will be blamed on the Patriarchy (tm).
/r/MensRights21/12/16 08:46 AM
13

I've always been a feminist. It's something I've never questioned and always felt confident and strident about. Well, feminists are that kind of people.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 08:42 AM
6

TL;DR: Stanford's Title IX Office suspends (maybe permanently) marching band for being college students. Females write petition against decision because the band is fun for everybody. Feminism: the reason nobody can have good things. They're the new puritans. Among other things.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 08:38 AM
4

So according to the author, empowerment is exerting a modicum of self-control. Her example for a man is losing 30 pounds. Her example for a woman is not getting roaring drunk. And the author knows women: Sex isn’t love, which is what 99 percent of women are looking for. What do you know, I've been fucking the 1%! . She's probably well-meaning: The pool of marriageable men diminishes over time, and there’s a window for your ability to conceive. Yup, both true. Not only are men not the enemy (at w…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 08:28 AM
5

Nutshell: the odds of a man earning at least as much as his father at the same age have dropped from 90% in the '70s to 40% in the '10s. For women, it drop from 40% to 20%, but rebounded in the '00s to 28% now. The author fails to establish causality between male constant drop and female rebound, so, misleading title. . But something shifted around the year 2000. Yeah, quotas. . Also, women in the 21st century obtain on average 10,000% of what their fathers got from their divorce.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 12:00 AM
23

Oh, if they send men to another app, it's OK then. Try this on for size: we don't serve Negroes here, but I can point you to a shop where they do. Ah, nope, not OK. They discriminate.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:51 PM
1

Yeah well, I'm not familiar with PUAs, but in my experience, you tend to know in the first handful of minutes whether you have a shot at a woman or not.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:54 PM
1

So, the Austrian performs as expected despite the political circus. European politicians who have spent their lives bending over backwards to not offend the easily offended are now beginning to wonder why people say they're divorced from reality, or are calling for 'stronger' leaders. Austria's FPÖ went null to fifty in only 10 years. Well, 10% to >45, but one has to wonder why.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:45 PM
259

She can knock a boner out at 50 pace. Men age like wine, Schumer aged in her teens.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:24 PM
5

And to learn to enjoy masculinity. Cause there's a lot of good stuff there. Actually, the best women I've been with had strong father figures too.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:10 PM
49

But .. they're a basket of deplorables!
/r/MensRights20/12/16 04:07 PM
15

Gendered behaviour can't be taught and doesn't need to be. I think I see where you're going with this, but behaviour can be nurtured and refined. Boys need to be around men to (better) learn how to behave like one. It used to happen naturally, in the olden times when boys weren't cloistered away for the best part of 2 decades with only female role models, and often not the best females, when not downright hostile to them. In a nutshell, before modern schools.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 03:33 PM
35

Because (vaguely attractive) women never try and cultivate an entourage of useful-albeit-less-attractive males for emotional validation and other menial tasks? This is done by (very low-key) occasional flirting, and well, what do you expect as a result? . Also, this 'friend-zone' wording is so misleading. It's just a 'no-sex zone', it has nothing to do with friendship to begin with. You don't 'friend-zone' your friends.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 03:27 PM
62

Could you please not use disreputable news sources, such as MTV... /s As I wrote previously, this is passive-aggressive, divisive bullshit, basically stating you're either with or against them. And since I don't agree with them, well, at least they make it clear for me. . “Black lives just matter. There’s no need to overcomplicate it.” Yup, no need to burn cars or anything. We all love Beyoncé, Wel, I don't. Thanks for reminding me I'm not one of 'us'. How inclusive. and yes, she’s black, so of …
/r/MensRights20/12/16 02:08 PM
7

Oh, and again, your teacher wil try to justify this as compensation for "centuries of oppression". The Leftist doctrine that two wrongs make a right when it suits them. Except s/he'd have to prove said oppression, and even then, go take from the dead to compensate the dead.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:55 PM
13

Denying a man a job he's qualified for because of his genitals and to make room for a woman is no different from forcing Negroes to the back of the bus. Americans of every colour fought against this. Now American of every colour are pushing to bring it back, with white males the disenfranchised category.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 01:51 PM
19

The capitalist view is that hiring is based on (expected) ability to perform. If you hire a person because she's a woman and not because she's good for the job, well, there's no reason she'd be any good. You could argue she brings value to the job by virtue of being female, and thus fulfilling the quota, and thus need less value deriving from performance. . Morally, these quotas have to be universal. There has to be quotas for deep mining, garbage collecting or construction. Take it to the extre…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 12:36 PM
1

white men in Europe and the United States are the beneficiaries of the single greatest affirmative action program in the history of the world. It is called "the history of the world." Might have something to do with the fact that white men in Europe and America have made a good deal of the "history of the world" in the recent centuries. The cobbler's children may be the worst-shod, but the cook's children are always the best fed. Except it's now out of fashion to kiss the cook. . And even then, …
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:55 AM
10

Archive “Beyond prohibiting overt gender discrimination, policies must be created to address embedded inequalities in procedures surrounding labour markets and compensation in the workplace.” Translates to: a level field means I have to work too. Lemme have laws to get paid while not working. . Seriously, Aussie men should acknowledge the depression and PTSD afferent to the sentencing gap, the divorce-outcome gap, the death gap, and start moping around doing nothing. Let all these women have the…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:32 AM
18

Opening line: Hey fellow white guys. I'm thinking maybe this is humour. But, nah. It's just so stupid it's offensive to the concept of human intelligence. "White men" are a demographic category. It's a statistical abstraction. If there is such a thing as a fellowship of all white men, or a Patriarchy club, I wasn't invited. . Opposive to what they claim, their whole attitude fosters a divisive, us-vs-them state of mind: you either bow to their view of the world, or are the enemy. As a member of …
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:11 AM
5

Looked it up on the French media, not really front page, but all point to "man dead after beating with high heels", and report his "bothering" the woman as hypothetical, and his death as factual. The DA equivalent is waiting on forensics to decide whether to indict for accidental death or murder. . So yeah, self-defense stops the moment the threat is removed. In this case, she will have to prove that the only way to safeguard her own person was to kill this man, which will probably prove a tall …
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:28 PM
7

I was raised by your average '70s post-hippie Left-leaning, feminist-by-default parents. Egalitarians actually, but feminism has always managed to stiffle dissenting labels. Anyway, I was raised thinking that both parents were basically interchangeable. They are not. My kids taught me that. In true hermetic imagery, fathers preside over both boundaries and transitions. Justice and mischief. And yes, we are awesome, because our children need us to be.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 11:15 PM
18

Sally Rhoads-Heinrich, owner of Surrogacy in Canada Online. “The majority is gay and, of the heterosexual ones, their reasons for pursuing surrogacy are usually because they couldn’t find the right partner.” And surrogacy has much cheaper than the alternative, ie: matrimony. Used to be that marriage had side benefits, but now the risk fairly outweigh them.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 05:45 PM
5

Feminism is actually declining, in numbers, compared to the '70s.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 05:42 PM
8

First Lady Michelle Obama is tired of the “angry black woman” label [...] Now, the First Lady is addressing what’s behind the label and what happens in her mind when she hears it. Basically, being called an angry black woman makes her angry. Ironic. . Now maybe she could go from there and understand what her calling people racist, useless or violent white men achieves. But, nah, probably not. Introspection is so much effort.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 01:54 PM
9

Men are both this system's victims and its only support. The system won't change as long as it's tenable, even comfortable, for those who count, ie: lawmakers, big brands and such. Spread the word, actively boycott any brand or politician who shows any form of support for the status quo. Once mocking white males in advertisment becomes commercial suicide, you can expect a swift change in the media, and what's acceptable or not. Collateral damages expected, bu at this point, anything's better tha…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:46 AM
12

When you have rats in your house, do you move and leave your stuff to the rodents?
/r/MensRights18/12/16 11:38 AM
18

Because it's well known that when a horse starts slowing down, you whip it some more. And when you're left on your own, you blamed it on that fucking horse who died. . This is not justice, this is hatred, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:30 AM
13

This is gonna be the thing which future generations will hate us for. They will blame their morally rigid, semi-facist society on the pendulum swinging back hard from our excesses. They'll see us as decadent, lenient and complacent, and think we've left them with the bill for our behaviours. They'll probably be right too.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:23 AM
6

TL;DR: it's not too long. Read all about Ye Olde Divorce-Rape. Although the woman may be an opera singer with £40,000 a year, not a penny of it can be touched, even for the children, but every week, in the police-courts, a working man with perhaps 18s or 20s a week may be seen ordered to pay two-thirds of it for the keep of a woman who has treated him with cruel malignity.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 01:36 PM
2

Garbage is an interesting illustration of feminism: Manson is the front of the band, but she's (originally) just fluff the guys picked up from a her own failed band. Music, lyrics, production, it's all the discreet men behind, with Manson picking up the trade fromm them over the years. So yeah, a real woman making it on her own. /s Then again, she also cites Michelle Obama as a role model, whose claim to fame is basically being someone's wife.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:46 AM
1

This is really, really not my point. Numerous kids => cost on career.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:29 AM
18

[White men] were, after all, the old hegemons. They dished out discrimination; now they should accept a taste of their own medicine. Except I personally wasn't, didn't, and most certainly will not. From my point of view, I'm being embroiled in a war I did not start, but will definitely end. We all agree that governing bodies should struggle to represent those they govern. Good gracious, no! I truly expect to be govern by people more intelligent than average, for one thing. The BBC was called hid…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 10:07 PM
-1

Not wanting to sound dismissive, but your guy is saying that antagonism breeds antagonism? That people under the same threat tend to unite against the common enemy? Wow, he sure puts his "many fancy, liberal artsy degrees from all over the world" to good use. His only redeeming feature is that he can formulate this in the fancy linguo bingo that will make it intelligible to the Left. Not that it will change anything, they'll just double down on the basket of deplorables and whine that people don…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:55 PM
9

Just a note seeing this picture again: apex fallacy. The cartoon woman wears a cartoon power suit. Executives are what, 10% of the workforce? Feminism does tend to ignore the bottom 90% ...
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:47 PM
3

Well I know a few Catholic families who can give Mormons a run for their money (maybe), with 5 to 6 kids each. In all three cases, one parent had to renounce her career, and yes in all three cases it was the woman. Because 6 pregnancy leaves kind of kills your prospects anyway. So yeah, earning gap, but not through any form of misogyny.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 09:45 PM
5

I usually refer to myself as a 40-something, cause it makes the 'something' look smaller. I try to hang on to my boyish charms. I work with healthcare often enough to have a good estimate of the divide between retiring GPs and their replacements. It's a bloody chasm. At the other end of the spectrum, I tutored a few graduate students, taught a little, and well, in my time standards were already flagging, but soon afterward they started plummeting hard. Still in touch with people from that time, …
/r/MensRights15/12/16 08:31 PM
8

Wow, 3 out of 5 in Utah. Isn't Utah the state with the highest number of children per couple? Like, a huge 3.4 per couple? Any statistics on women's career choices, or lack thereof, and part-time employment?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 05:23 PM
7

One still isn't understanding the difference between wages and earnings yet. And she wonders why she can't get a high-paying job...
/r/MensRights15/12/16 05:17 PM
8

In September, the parole board voted 7-0 to deny his exoneration case. That case was rejected because the judge and the district attorney did not provide sufficient evidence that was properly tested, I'm not sure I get this. Evidence shows he cannot be the perpetrator. But the parole board demands proofs of innocence, from the prosecution, for someone who is legally not guilty. McKinney [..] could be eligible for up to $1 million in compensation if the Tennessee Parole Board hears his exoneratio…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 05:15 PM
3

Because "alt-right" is the newest shaming language, so obviously, it gets applied to men. White men. And MRAs. This article basically calls all MRAs a basket of deplorables, because the "ctrl-left" (two can play this game) has mostly devolved into a one-trick tapeworm. . Archive [Trump] eerily echoed some of the dangerous beliefs of the men’s-rights movement. Because statistics are belief. Laws are belief. Just like the Tooth Fairy and the Loch Ness Monster. Except neither has ever killed or rui…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 04:19 PM
11

Mushroom students: kept in the dark and fed shite. Note that this students are tomorrow's America. And England. And Australia. To a (slightly) lesser extent Germany and France too. Sort of makes me wonder who will actually get shite done when we're too old to.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 01:20 PM
2

Engage and destroy! Seriously, most of these people would starve within a month in a just, merit-based society.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 10:13 AM
1

Why suppose a conspiracy when converging greed is enough?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 10:07 AM
1

REEEEEEEEEEEEE approximately.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 08:33 AM
2

because they're fucking scared of being called racist Because Social Justice Warriors have successfully declared war on justice.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 08:28 AM
8

Both groom and bride appear to be rather rough people. Minor altercation, no injuries, no ill-will (yeah, some people punch each other affectiously), 'someone' calls the police, groom detained (later released without charge) against bride's request. Because them arrest statistics. And because white men deserve prison, known fact. . Brilliant British police work. Aren't they the ones who failed to notice thousand-strong pedophile rings for over a decade? Rotherham? Bradford? Manchester? Sheffield…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 11:30 AM
6

As in: manpaying, manworking, manprotecting or manproviding? Let's put a stop to these bad, bad things.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 11:21 AM
11

The BBC headline reads: Men's rights MP Philip Davies voted on to women's committee At least we know were they stand. I actually don't have a problem with people saying that men are disposable and can go fuck themselves, except I want the same self-penetrative option when it comes to paying taxes... . That's the long and short of it is, and what European governments are beginning to discover: I don't pay for a system that's against me. I like to think I'm not that stupid. And apparently not alon…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 11:12 AM
6

Archive China feminist warns Trump ‘Feminists worldwide are speaking, and we are watching you’ Trump is a billionaire, recently elected (or soon-to-be) leader of the most powerful nation on the planet. She's a Chinese cat-lady nicknamed 'Big Rabbit'. I'm not completely sure of the amount of fucks given, but they must be few. . The laws that feminists managed to have passed are a big issue. The insane pandering to women and complete male disposability are an issue. Feminists themselves are a mino…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:51 AM
3

I honestly don't think xem can fit in there.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:49 PM
4

Ze / Zé is a common form of José (Joseph) in Portugual.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:45 PM
2

Discontent, thy name is male!
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:08 PM
176

This, gentlemen, is commonly known as a "shite test". The correct answer being "sod off". That, and I find 'ze' insulting, as it invalidates my experience as a self-identified cis-gendered shite-lord. Muh manly feelz. . Actually, for a second, I thought Portugal had taken over Oxford.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:07 PM
41

Smashing news for equality. And for real women. Would be even greater if they dropped the 'women' and focused on 'equalities', because it's all there, really.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:01 PM
5

In other news, man bites dog. Although this would be more interesting. So, guy lies and stand dates up with bill. Sounds dishonest, but may be legal, probably not, gray enough area: "But she said she was treating me!" and it's all back to he said, she said. Women do that too; actually, society enforces that men pay, and women don't have to pull a runner. What do they want, a law? . People are crap. Get used to it. Man up.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:54 PM
4

Dating hasn't been made harder by women's rights. It has been made harder by female entitlement, with any mediocre woman feeling she has a right to tall, handsome and wealthy. Can't remember the link to the study, but when men on a dating site rated women, it yielded a nice Gaussian around 5 out of 10. When women did the same for men, 80% were under 5. Sad, but 80% of women are competing for the top 10% men, and now they feel like it is owed to them.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:29 PM
3

Because the mob still needs a plausible parody of justice, else it explicitely becomes might makes right, and might definitely is not on SJWs' side.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:09 AM
5

It's a typo. He's describing feminism.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:04 AM
23

They may feel entitled to refusing male parties because of the potential for drunken destruction. I know not all men drink themselves into rage, you see, I'm not a bigot, but some do. /s . Another attempt to impose on all the consequences of the actions Then again, if you support this position, you'll have to agree that owners of business can turn down women (they steal, not all of them, but some do), coloured (they, well, whatever), and so on. Which is the reason for anti-discrimination laws. A…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 09:58 AM
15

Archive. And a woman cut in line in front of me once, meaning that each and every single woman in existence, well make it past and future too, is literaly Hitler. Complete, with the Adolf 'stache and bad hairdo. Look at me, I'm a feminist! . First, there's always three sides to every story. Second, if we start counting every single occurence of bad behaviour among the 1 bn people of the Western world, we'll need bigger Interwebz. Third, I refuse to be shamed for the actions of a stranger. Drunke…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:59 AM
1

:)
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:48 AM
1

Democrats bandy around that Trump was elected by uneducated angry racist deplorable white males. All 60-odd millions of them. /s I think he's just trying to establish that he represents (around 50% of) the American people, hence downplaying his white male vote in favour of female and non-white.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:47 AM
1

I'll agree (partly) with the previous opinion: in large quantity, sex loses a good deal of its intimacy or bonding potential. At least I think it does. Now as to whether this is fucked up or freeing, well, from a male point of view, it probably prevents a lot of bad decisions. Once again, TRP is probably right about abondance mentality.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 08:39 AM
2

Current father to a 2 yo: he's much more mature than that.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 04:49 PM
19

That kind of reasonning should take us way back socially. Let's try this: Men are not women, hence men should never have legislated to give women the vote in the first place. Let's take this one back. People who cannot be drafted shouldn't get a vote to elect the commander-in-chief. People who don't pay taxes shouldn't get a vote on how taxes are spent People who don't earn businesses shouldn't regulate how businesses are run. Goes double for banks, triple for Wall Street. We've done all these t…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 04:25 PM
9

Considering >80% of divorces are initiated by women, well, it's because of men, obviously. . Archive of the cited article, itself based off a (apparently crappy) study. Seriously, you don't 'survey' people's n-counts. Men lie. Women lie. Just, not in the same direction. Also, they fail to look for a correlation between n-count and other social factors, which may be more directly related to divorce. Such as ethnicity/culture. . And well, "non-linear trend", as in, the results don't support my nar…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 12:12 PM
18

I don't think these people actually care enough about their children to even look at them. My son has access to his elder sister's toys (and vice versa). He sometimes plays with his sister's dolls. He just doesn't play the same way. He's a boy. She's a girl. Doesn't mean I try to confine them (my girl comes running when I break out the tool box), but they're stereotypes for a reason.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:36 AM
15

It looks like he's arguing against the narrative of "uneducated white male Trump voters", not proclaiming misandry.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:14 AM
2

Fact is, I'm a man. This could arguably change, but, nah. I'm also white. Can't change that. I hope someday to be 'elderly'. Beats the alternative, I'm already too late to leave a beautiful corpse. . These people drawing a line in the sand, proclaiming white men as the enemy, well, from my point of view, they need to go. Self-preservation dictates I neutralize their capacity to harm my family. Details of said neutralization indiferrent. I mean, they're just strangers who hate me for what I am. N…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:08 AM
1

Nah, we have the technology to pile up another 10 bn. We, as in the people who don't need it. On the other hand, there are about as many Chinese in chronic starvation areas as there are Europeans.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:44 AM
2

We citizens of Europe and North America are not the world. We're not even 20% of the world. I don't know enough about China or India or South America to have an opinion as to what impact this would have for them. Africa, well, they already have bigger issues.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:38 AM
20

Yeah well, male contraception may well be the last nail in matrimony's coffin. At least it will decrease the divorce rate. . The only issue will be the (far below replacement) birth rates. It says a lot about society, actually, that making it more just and equal for men will doom it.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 11:40 PM
1

Except, who feels like 'the chosen white'?
/r/MensRights11/12/16 11:32 PM
7

Fill the blank in the following sentence: Michelle Obama <...> Melania Trump. Seriously.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 08:11 PM
9

Fear the wrath of the lazy and the complacent! They are going on strike, and they'll stop doing nothing! They may actually have very harsh words! . Seriously, yes, privileged America needs to go to war against Joe Everybody. It's not even a matter of education, Trump was apparently the majority vote among the college-educated. It's really a case of the useless wanting to bite the hand that feeds because they are unhappy.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 05:29 PM
3

Actually, I think the best message would in fact be another "Dear Colleague" letter, but not as intrusive as the first one. Mine would say: "Dear Colleague, do as thou wilst. But forget not, consequences." And then of course another letter to every judge to signal open season against any Title IX office accused of due process denial, of partisan investigation and so on.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 05:17 PM
15

There are two very detrimental sides to the "happy wife, happy life" image these men peddle: women grow up expecting their future husband to submit in their relationship. And also to be rich, assertive, or for want of a better word, alpha. Cue disapointement. The average woman is by definition average; the man who wil look up to that is, well, it's basic geometry: not the one she wants to be fucked by. young, unmarried men are allowed to think they're somewhat cool / dank / whatever we are now s…
/r/MensRights11/12/16 05:10 PM
9

Hypergamy at its finest, except, Michelle Obama. Does she really think she can do better?
/r/MensRights11/12/16 05:00 PM
87

Accusation: no legal bar. Anybody can accuse, no proff required, and no consequences for false accusers. College transcript: sentence. . So yeah, sentence without due process. They're advocating mob justice.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 11:09 AM
2

Not American, but those I know spend 5 to 10% of their time, year in, year out. Pretty big, actually.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:31 PM
6

Most pro bono is rather low profile. I'll admit this case may have perks for the barrister.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:26 PM
5

Good thing these people don't make laws...
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:10 PM
4

Teaching doesn't mean kindergarten (takes a special kind of patience, though I know a bloke or two who'd be great with toddlers). Universities used to be very male. Been there, done that, wouldn't now. Sexual assault claim minefields.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:07 PM
1

Actually, yes, sometimes. With a very broad brush, I'd categorize attractive women into attractive & confident (the best kind), and attractive & insecure (to varing degrees). You can gauge how insecure a woman is by her enforcing of the appearance pecking order as regards to surrounding women. Never overt, but rarely subtle. . Needless to say #2 is a bad combination for the woman herself: insecure is easily manipulated, with attractive as an incentive to.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:01 PM
137

Cherika Harris says she did it because she is outraged by how the system treated Carnell Alexander. It's a good remainder that, while their reputation as a profession is hardly spotless, many attorneys do take cases pro bono (publico), ie: for the public good.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:25 PM
10

Well, things have changed since then. Women can boast triple-digits partner counts (it's empowering) and feel entitled to a marriage (else it's slut shaming). For men, well, at least they don't get send to prison anymore. Unless they miss down-payments. Or she claims violence. Or he violates the 57th TRO. Or writes something bad on his Facebook wall. Or he has a small dick.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:18 PM
7

TL;DR: men (and only men, of course) support the new alt-right (which is literally Hitler) because they are weak-willed and lost. Also, mouth-breathing rednecks, each and everyone, and it's up to us, valiant Warriors of the Justice Social, to educate them. Oops, my bad, the article does not propose a single 'solution', it keeps talking down to people, which never, ever antagonizes them. . “If people followed the alt-right groups on Reddit, they would know that young white Americans were told to …
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:15 PM
31

Remember that alimony and child support were huge, wonderful feminist coups. How would you feel about a situation like yours if the gender roles were reversed? While alimony reform is ripe for reform, To be part of the solution for other families, find the advocates for alimony reform in your state, and get involved. Now that alimony looks like it may become a two-way streets in the indefinite future, they suddenly wants to reform it?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:07 PM
30

If gender reversal is unjust, then the current situation is unjust. Justice 101. . Increasingly, it is moms who pay their exes child support and alimony, Considering the situation, male custody can't really decrease anyway.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:16 AM
12

This is about her having authority over him as a teacher, and allegedly using it as leverage for sex.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:11 AM
3

I would say in select movie theaters. I've heard there would be digital distribution at some point.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:08 AM
7

"Dear John" is a long-standing military tradition, as in "Dear John, I love you and admire your choice to serve, but your dick is too far to pound me and your wallet too far to pay for me, so I'm dumping you for your best friend Gary who stayed home. Have fun on the French beaches." Recruits were taught to expect Dear John in the first few months. Now it has become: "Dear John, you've been gone for at least 10 days, but that's a lot of minutes. Riding cock for the last week got me thinking what …
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:44 AM
8

Usual feminist stance: we've 'found' a stash of money (nearby hard-working men), and we want quotas to divide it up into our pockets. . These gems: family violence costs the Victorian economy $3.4 billion a year, including the $800 million the police spend each year on family violence-related incidents. Pushing our anti-male policies is costly; we need more money from males. Also, what are the other 2.6 bn? The plan [..] includes big thinking OK then. Oh, to have such thinking – and spending – i…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:22 AM
53

Why are there not enough male teachers again? Because male teachers rape. Females only commit sexual assault. /s
/r/MensRights09/12/16 07:56 AM
22

TL;DR: D-list female singer rides the cock carousel. Meets a cuck fetishist, thinks he's perfect beta bucks, at least at the emotional level. Finally realizes he's topping from the bottom. Relationship too much work, goes back to CC. . Lesson in that? None, really. Some women are like that. Some are different. Don't stick your dick in trash. Unless that's your thing.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 10:18 PM
3

Both seem pathological. The guy needs to have mostly no refractory period, and have dry orgasm after the first few. Has for the woman, well, that's 27s per orgasm, all included. 20s to get there, 2 s orgasm, 5s to come down a little, rinse, repeat. Not accounting for lubrication (and decreasing thereof), vaginal wall engorgment, and so on. What is she, a machine?
/r/MensRights08/12/16 10:05 PM
9

“For the last 40 years, numeric racial and gender quotas like those mandated by the Texas Bar have been struck down by the courts as unconstitutional.” Which is why law is better left to professionals. Not university boards, not tumblr, not Oprah.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 06:31 PM
4

The argument is that female interest may change, but the barrier due to different biology and an equality law that doesn't account for said biology will not.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:42 PM
1

Then we agree on so many things that our disagreements are immaterial :)
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:01 PM
2

So what, you think we're gonna live forever? Feminists probably do more damage to the reproductive bottom line by pushing toward a segregated (and sterile) society (see MGTOW) than they would by not reproducing. Heck, the rise of the 40-something childless whiner shows they're not reproducing either anyway.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:58 PM
6

Maybe, or maybe you're reading too much into this. Anyway, we do agree on one thing: shame. Lose the shame, and they have no leverage. I am unapologetic about my tastes in women, which actually often are approved by other women. Because women love bringing other women down, it weeds out competition. On the other hand, admitting to the 'inner beauty' of fat women to an audience of semi-attractive females only establishes that your validation is cheap, and therefore useless. The long and short of …
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:54 PM
10

Actually, and I find a perverse pleasure in this line of reasoning, there is at least one structural reason women are paid less. And it, as pointed out by Milton Friedman in the '80s, is the Equal Pay Act. To summarize, all these "muh wage gap" articles are written by the (sadly) college-educated, for the college-educated. But what about the other 80%? A portion of so-called unqualified jobs actually do hold one qualification: physical strength. Example: construction. The Equal Pay Act says I ha…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 03:46 PM
28

Why do we care about this again? She very much looks like an unfuckable cow. Unless she has a cure for cancer, why do I care about her opinion, especially regarding myself? She's just trying to boost her self-esteem by bringing down 95% of the male population in her own little mind. . I understand how Kioh's retort may be vengefully satisfying, but let's be honest, it's probably nothing to this woman when compared to her everyday lack of male gaze. You know, the way our eyes just slip over her k…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:14 PM
4

My understanding of this is that Crowe actually did the twat a favour, by de-escalating a situation where she was very likely to commit assault with a weapon (you wilfully break glass in order to obtain a cutting edge, legally a weapon). And/or be subdued by means of a bigger weapon, and then booked for assault. Sadly, I doubt Crowe or another threatened party will press charges.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 01:56 PM
7

And here I was, thinking the guy was just the Narnia author... . Obvious conclusion is, let's not do these things. Let's rejoice in masculinity / male values / whatever you call the things we've been doing these last few centuries. Cause it served us well. And by 'us' I mean men & women. In all three sentences.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 01:49 PM
3

Machines have always been good replacement for 'soft skills' and caring. Consider this ancient machine: the teddy bear. We humans project on anything. Meaning sexbots will definitely be a thing.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 08:18 AM
1

You can lead the ass to water, but you can't make it drink. Trying is at the cost of liberty, and in my opinion doomed to fail. I remember reading somewhere that there were two dangers in this world: terrorists and well-intentioned people.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 08:14 AM
25

Maybe we should begin to talk about accusation survivors.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:16 PM
2

phenomenally high IQ (like 130 + or something). Just being pedantic, but 130 is around the top 3%, so 1 person in 30 to 40. Not so impressive, probably more common on some subs than others, though.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:15 PM
7

Feminism: the reason we can't have nice things.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:07 PM
1

Reality is diverse, this is why we need judges. someone claimed to be pressured to make the allegation? Burden of proof, else it's voices made me do it. Or say if they withdraw 2 weeks later, but in that time the man has lost his job and girlfriend? Lie has occured. Harm has occured. someone claims full rape where only serious sexual assault occurred Someone would have to be creative with reality, so willfull lie, intent to obtain harsher sentence, would qualify in my book. Especially considerin…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 05:34 PM
22

Come on, that's just lesbian utopia ranting. They are stupid, but they have a right to.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 05:03 PM
3

The minimum criteria to prosecute probably are: deliberatley false claims, not just misinformed. Fine line, can be toed by playing stupid. malice, ie: the will to cause harm. This example meets both, but if this was to ever become a trend, expect many false negative, ie: prosecutors erring on the side of (their own) safety, and deciding not to pursue.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 04:59 PM
12

Trump represents a vision of masculinity that those who embrace the modern economy have readily abandoned. By encouraging men to cling to work that isn't coming back, Trump is doing them a disservice. Because we have moved on beyond building housing and infrastructure. I see it everyday. /s These sectors where women excel may not be so safe either. First, they're often about redistributing value, not creating it. Second, they definitely are not safe from robotic replacement. I think it's easier …
/r/MensRights07/12/16 04:26 PM
26

Woman was not the accuser. Making it easy for you: Later in the investigation a second man, Lee Goodsell, was arrested on suspicion of the same offences [guns and fencing] and was placed on police bail. But having become aware of the second arrest, Carter decided to make a statement to the police which further incriminated Goodsell, who was subsequently charged on the authority of the Crown Prosecution Service. Carter, the woman, put a hose in the mouth of a man who was drowning through no initi…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 03:57 PM
1

Feminists are <10% of women. Other birds. Abundance mentality.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 03:48 PM
8

One would expect that by age 18, men would have grown quite attached to their foreskin... And the legal reasoning is sound: circumcision is quite a bit more intrusive than Christian baptism. I mean, hey, if you don't believe anymore, it was just water and a big-ass candle. Whereas, believe it or not, your dick's cut off. Ouch.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 10:59 AM
218

Woman bears false testimony against man, gets him embroiled in an otherwise unrelated investigation, man spends 5 months in jail awaiting trial, woman fails to show up and is proved a liar. Woman is sentenced to 18-month community order for perverting the course of justice. Solicitor General, Robert Buckland QC MP refers her case to the Court of Appeal, where woman gets 12 month hard time. Solicitor General: 'False witness statements can destroy lives and undermine faith in the entire criminal j…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 10:51 AM
6

Well, it does illustrate how male consent is always presumed. It takes an eccentric character (is that Mr Bean?) to refuse a woman.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:19 AM
1

I'll wait for the movie. Nope, not even that.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 08:43 AM
1

Proof? That which is affirmed without proof is rebuked without proof. . And who says I want to end prejudice? I think it's part of human nature, like it or not. On what authority do I dictate what people are authorised to think or not? Laws are in place to prevent bigoted actions. Put in place equal opportunity hiring laws (not quotas), people have to work together, most will grow beyond their prejudice. Haters will still hate, but it's their right. Henri Ford may have been terminally racist, bu…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 08:34 AM
0

Actually, you haven't engaged at all. Especially in discussion. Read your own posts: total lack of argument. Except for a final variation of "it's not my job to educate you". Intellectual indeed.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:33 PM
2

That the Guardian is nice and thick and keeps you warm on long winter nights. . Semi-related, but winter is upon us, and is not a gay season for all. I personally like to check my privilege, and remind myself that a little time and/or a little money can go a long way, if only to soothe my white man's guilt.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:30 PM
0

Are you arguing for my position? For example, France, one of the world’s richest countries, displays a lower-than- average level of trust on indexes, Foreign investment in France has tanked due to unstable fiscal laws under their current Socialist government. Interesting real estate, but only if they switch majority. Cause you know, trust. . Laws will send you to prison or not. Judges argue in law more than in morality, especially in canon law countries. Laws run our societies on a daily basis. …
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:16 PM
20

SJW think that growing facial hair is affirming patriarchal values, or simply that beards are a men-only thing ... so they decide to not shave their armpits and legs. I say it's a good thing: massive, visible red flag. Early warning, even. With any luck, they will push themselves out of the gene pool.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:14 PM
2

Well, I don't get why I'm attracted to boobs, but I am. I just don't deny it, whereas women shame each other for accepting their nature.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:09 PM
2

They think they want security, when they only mistake it for control. And control is an illusion.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:03 PM
1

Legality is the only thing relevant to society. Morality is personal. Hence the need for laws.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:02 PM
10

And unto others as unto yourself. Although Bill & Ted's always a winner.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:01 PM
1

Wholeheartedly agreed with, BUT I profoundly believe that balance is best achieved by opposing forces, not by a central, single agency. It's the way of most biology, actually: two antagonistic mechanisms cooperate (as in literally operate together) to produce regulation. CHS is definitely the yin side that men can, courteously and productively, oppose to achieve the common goal of equality.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:49 PM
3

Woman marries older and richer co-worker (boss?), makes it big on her side, he pursues less paying job. She now outearns him. And is not happy. Women don't marry down. Hypergamy, if you will. . Also revealing: the male host tries to advise her on how to naviguate this or come clean. The female host, well, she knows: I think that you either need to end your marriage and go find a powerful, rich guy to be your partner, or [...] I think the deeper question is, how is your husband's wealth connected…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:15 PM
40

Author Margaret Atwood said, “Men are afraid women will laugh at them. Women are afraid men will kill them.” Question is, do men actually kill women? More than the baseline level of murder? Hint: men are 90% of perps (at least, convicted perps, grain of salt may apply), and 75+% of victims. a whopping 43 per cent of women sometimes experience harassment on the street when they run. That’s in contrast to the 4 per cent of men who experienced the same. Or men simply set a higher bar for harassment…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:46 PM
2

Probably a spin on death being the great equalizer, as it strikes kings and peasants alike. "God made men. Sam Colt made them equal."
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:10 PM
25

First, racism, sexism, yadda-ism and yadda-phobia are protected by most constitutions. How one acts may be subject to the law, but freedom of opinion first and foremost protects the opinions I don't like, and this way lies justice. Same goes for freedom of speech and association. White guys want to go out in the woods and talk how them niggers are bad? Their right. They put on pointy hats and start shooting them bad niggers? Laws apply, racist bigots get sent to prison, their club is disbanded. …
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:46 PM
1

(some women will disagree but I think a lot of women also agree). Experience shows that when it comes to sex, the opposite sex has a clearer point of view on some issues. Having slept with more heterosexual women than the average female, I'm of the opinion that there is a substantial difference between what women claim (especially to their social group) to like, to want, to do and not do, and the reality of sex. In short, I've seen (many) women lie through their teeth to their friends, and act t…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:28 PM
7

It's the tyranny of political correctness that one can't argue that people may be statistically different based on race or sex. The dogma of effective equality. Although I can't be certain, I've observed that most Black people have a skin visibly darker than mine. Which can't be, as we are all equal in every way. . Feminism hurts both men and women, by forcing people into what they are not naturally nor want to be. It claims freedom of choice but order the other 95% around. It thrives on misery.…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:58 PM
1

In short: it's not science.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:37 AM
5

From what little I know, Korean society just doesn't compare with ours. They're sort of WGTOW, but even that doesn't really compare, as Korean women are rather in-your-face with it, compared to Western males who often just silently drop off the grid. On the other end of the spectrum, Asian countries seem to be getting their fair-albeit-belated of (TRP says it most concisely) women riding the cock carousel but feeling entitled to their beta bucks. No pressure on men. Megalian went up with a big b…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:35 AM
7

I think the biologically vulnerable half of the species could reasonably be given a force-equalizing advantage by the law. And what about small guys? What about people with hand-to-hand training? No, the only way to "force-equalize" is to provide each and every citizen with a sidearm. I'm partial to 10mm auto. Just to be sure. No way it can go wrong.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:10 AM
2

Anybody can spew numbers. The real science is determining what question they're an answer to.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:51 AM
1

Big is a tool. Bigger hammer may push bigger nails, but one has to be careful. Actually, a guy doesn't get to choose his length more than he chooses his height, and it's not all that's it's hyped up to be. I mean, you sit on most toilets with only one hand free (porcelain is cold and icky), your favorite swim trunks colour is black, there's no bloody way you can hide the accidental stiffy. And then sex. When it suddenly feels better, well, the damn condom has ruptured. Again. Yeah, they can stre…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:11 AM
4

Lemme see: woman (Lady (Looks Like A Dude) by Asmithero) works up a mob to take down renowed scientist over maybe quaint, maybe stupid comment. Other crowd works itself up to boycott her, because said scientist is admired. Isn't that like, Social Justice Warring stuff? Shouldn't she feel proud? . SJW modus operandi, when not weaponizing justice for their own ends, is going to the mob because social might makes right. And cry when the bigger dog screws them over. They're a minority. Boycott is ef…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:33 AM
1

I did write "achieved and overshot". I'm curious about legitimate feminist goals in Western countries. 'Social' sounds dangerous to me. Actually sounds like something the law should stay away from, because slippery slope towards a thought police and tyranny. Humans are shitty. It's not the law's burden to make them less so, just to disincentive egregious actions.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:10 AM
5

"Worldwide". Where, for the most part, feminists don't tread, because it would be an effort. They'd rather ask men to defend those poor brown women that they don't care enough about to actually get up their fat arses. . As for the so-called gaps: in my country, there is no wage gap after accounting for circumstances. It's about as stupid as saying theirs an age wage gap: genZ is severely out-earned by genX. Do you advocate for equal representation in the Armed Forces? In mines? In sewers? And re…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:07 AM
1

I was just being stupid.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 10:44 PM
2

No, Title VII is an escaped prototype. Its targetting sub-systems were not final, and it kept expelling potted plants and river otters from the university. That it managed to convict potted plants of rape is a testament to its investigative algorithms, though.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:36 PM
6

Could be worse, he could become the haircut of MRM.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 09:32 PM
8

When asked to select the model which represented their preferred penis size in a long-term partner, the average response was 6.3 inches (16cm) in length and 4.8 inches (12.2cm) around. For a one-time sexual experience, the average plastic penis the women chose was slightly larger – 6.4 inches (16.3 cm) long and 5.0 inches (12.7cm) in circumference. These results are averages. Size queens are rather few (there a joke there with "and far between", I guess), but I'd say about 1 in 3 woman is curiou…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 07:52 PM
1

Feminism is a cult. The leaders know they are disingenuous. The followers are useful idiots for the leaders, dangerous idiots for the population at large. Guess that makes them idiots. . Also, a right is the pendant of a duty, else it's a privilege, and extracted from other people. Guess they don't teach that anymore in the glorified day-care they call higher learning.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 07:37 PM
13

If that voice is calm and judicious rather than hyperbolic and harping, people just might listen. To what? Equality has been achieved a few decades ago, and clearly overshot since. Feminism is whining for even more privilege. This can't be done calmly or reasonably. Else they'll start advocating men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:37 PM
2

Again?
/r/MensRights05/12/16 06:30 PM
20

Compare with the blind man top left: this woman has no feet! Now that's a disability for you. . Their overwhelming need to portray women as an oppressed minority is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:18 PM
3

Dame Louise Casey [...] highlighted that in some communities women were the subject of "abuse and unequal treatment of women enacted in the name of cultural or religious values". But but but! This is racism! Now things are getting interesting. This is the SJW's equivalent of the Chinese maodun: what happens when an unstoppable spear strikes an unbreakable shield? Males of "some communities" being said unstoppable spear, apparently. . Now seriously, noone is more priviledged than white middle-cla…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 05:09 PM
2

Maybe she could emigrate gradually. Like, in 200 lbs installments.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 04:48 PM
4

Fat chance
/r/MensRights05/12/16 04:48 PM
13

This is freedom of speech in action. This is good. And now we can go back to totally not changing the current definition of rape and leaving it a crime because it makes much more sense than whoever-this-is's opinion. Also, can we logically conclude that men can be raped too. By women, even. You know, sex without consent, or sometimes even consciousness.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 03:25 PM
3

By US standard's I'd probably be considered fairly heavily left. By our standards, Bernard Sanders would probably be centre-right. Hillary Clinton's definitely Right, though.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 02:55 PM
2

Sort of my point, she wore herself out whoring herself. Was funnier in my head.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 02:52 PM
2

Yep. To the point Friedman's reasonning can be applied to explain the one great, structural, oppressive source of a gender wage gap: the various Equal Pay Acts! Intent and result are such different beasts...
/r/MensRights05/12/16 02:50 PM
3

Sure it's not. Hasn't Congress been basically barring Obama from nominating Scalia's successor, waiting for the new incumbent? I'm sure Trump will propose exactly the same people. /s
/r/MensRights05/12/16 02:48 PM
1

That's the thing. Children are (to most people) an ongoing cost, while your procedure takes a little planning and saving. Sadly, this is beyond 80% of the population. Unless it gets sold on a 20% revolving credit.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 02:15 PM
1

She whore herself out? sorry can't resist bad pun
/r/MensRights05/12/16 02:04 PM
1

I didn't know it existed. As for kids, well, to each his own (pun intended). I always knew I was a father. Probably more so than a husband, sad as this may be for my spouse. I was just afraid my kids would be like me. Funny thing is, they are. And it's a good thing. . frankly I think its a good idea to make reversing them expensive I see your point, but it's also unavailable to most men at a few grands a pop. Arguably, considering the ongoing cost of children.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 02:02 PM
6

TIL Madonna is still alive. She never was politically relevant, but at least was insanely hot. 30 years ago. Time is cruel on (most) women, that lets the hag remember the maid.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:11 PM
2

TL;DW: man quotes my fav first: "Fuck you". Except I usually go more the Southern, bless your precious heart, route. "Fuck you" is better uttered in a genial tone.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:06 PM
1

Is vasectomy reliably reversible now? Or did you freeze some sperm?
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:01 PM
8

Topic raised by Catherine Deveny, an Australian author I know nothing about, but apparently an equality feminist. I must be old, for I've seen everything... . On the other hand, I postulate that opt-out / financial abortion / whatever it's called will be unfair to one sex, which one I do not know. It will almost necessarily create loopholes easily exploitable for one party (male plays possum, waits out mandatory notification period with phone off, or female 'fails' to inform male, forgets he was…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 12:13 PM
1

Then again, this would kill birth rates in the West, which, as countries, we can ill afford. I don't really expect to see male prior consent until male contraception is practically available, as it will kill birth rates anyway, for mostly the same reasons. Also, expect heavy political and social resistance to male contraception. Female social resistance, as they'll lose the exclusive power of decision on pregnancy.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 11:43 AM
2

I may be. I understand Roe v. Wade has argued December 13, 1971; reargued October 11, 1972; decided January 22, 1973. At the time, SCOTUS was 6R - 3D, 3 of which being nominated by Nixon. The decision was a 7-2, dissents being 1R, 1D. Both chambers were majoritarily Democrat, but, unless I'm mistaken, they do not rule the SCOTUS. . Where is my mistake?
/r/MensRights05/12/16 11:37 AM
1

People won't go for less rights People are currently going for less rights. Every month we give more power to a spy agency, or create exceptions to due process (hey, terrorism!) or restrict speech further. Those who would exchange liberty for perceived security are the majority. . And I agree with you, few people in real life will argue for one side to have less rights than the other, e.g: the insane example of France where maternity test is legal but not paternity. Even fewer people will consid…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 10:22 AM
5

Define "left-leaning". Here in Europe, a central tenet of Socialist Parties is equality of results. It used to be equality of opportunity. Also, no side of the political spectrum has a monopoly on fairness (term needing definition): laws such as employer/employee equality in court (yes, it wasn't always so) or universal suffrage were pushed by right-wing governements in most of Europe. America's Roe v. Wade is a Republican achievement. . Where I live, I'm considered right-wing because I think se…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:47 AM
1

A race to the bottom is damaging as long as it lasts. And what we're doing now certainly qualifies in my book. Institutionalizing sexism and racism through quotas, challenging basic tenets of justice like free speech, due process, presumption of innocence or the right to know one's accuser. If we can't reverse it, we (I mean Western society) can still limit the damage by going full throtte, hitting bottom and rebounding. In my mind, it's by far the lesser evil when compared to inscribing facism …
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:30 AM
6

This whole 'opt out' thing is barely feasible in practice. The logistics are insane. Why not go 'opt in'? As in, a man is not liable for a child unless he has given his enthusiastic, and written, consent beforehand? With the obligatory post-natal DNA test, cause the agreement is for his child, not a child. No more surprise pregnancies, no more shotgun marriage, no more paternal discrepancies. Which are all the reasons this will never happen.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 10:29 PM
1

The grass is always greener on the other side... European-style socialism replaces merit with quotas, and thus tends to discourage any personal involvement in one's job. Or in creating jobs for others. Pushing this to the extreme, Communism is an incentive for the smart guy to get a dumb, 9 to 5 job, thus depriving the nation of engineers or surgeons. For now, Europe is clearly pushing to the right, but our brand of capitalism is probably pretty close to the balance you're looking for.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 09:19 PM
2

Can probably do all 4 at the same time. Maybe needs a selfie stick.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 08:54 PM
9

Said idiots are operating upon Hollywood logic. In a good many cases, a knife doesn't get you arrested for assault. It gets you arrested for murder. Cause stabbing people tend to kill them to a distressing proportion.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 08:53 PM
1

Our (European) left tend to be different from America's. Much closer to its socialist roots. Much farther from free speech to, see all these laws that wouldn't fly under America's 1st. Social inequalities have actually increased over my lifetime in Western society: the gap between the top 1% and the median has never been wider, and the middle class has shrunk from 16 to 11%. . Anyway, the advent of male contraception will do more than any amount of activism.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 07:06 PM
1

My point is that I'm amused by this whole scare-mongering about abortion rights. And it's cropping up in Europe too, because the Left is the same anywhere you go. Well, the Western Left anyway. Europe is transitioning to the right, so, FUD. Abortion laws are a qualitative, objective, already-attained result. Access is a lot more subjective, and will be used as a diversion from other subjects, even if the Trump administration does nothing to change its current state. Whether based in fact or not,…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 05:24 PM
20

TL;DR: what the author calls 'surrendering' is actually realising marriage does not make you either the boss or the owner of your spouse. In this case, that men can be treated as human beings. Them crazy progressives! Why not free the Negroes? Or even give them the vote? . Much of our fighting stemmed from the fact I thought my husband was clueless when it came to raising the children Including his children from a previous marriage. The more I told my husband how he should be, the less he'd try.…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 04:27 PM
2

Hey, I said it was destructive. But less so than having a whole future generation of men opt out of fatherhood. Or half a generation. Or even a third. Anyway, you get a lot more with a polite word and a big stick than with just a polite word. . I do agree that if (and it's a big if) Pence et al. make abortion a practical impossibility, it will saturate the public discourse and deprioritize men's rights discussions to Kingdom come. On the other hand, I also think men's issues will only be adresse…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 04:13 PM
5

Anecdocal, but have you ever tried turning down a woman? In my personal life, I remember a man telling me that women should reject men’s sexual advances in a way that won’t hurt the man’s feelings. And, that sounds reasonable on first glance. However, unfortunately, honest communication of the feelings “I am not sexually attracted to you” is considered hurtful to most men. So, women are forced to not communicate their honest feelings in order to protect the man from feeling anything bad. "Sorry,…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 04:00 PM
5

However, what could get in the way of it is Roe v. Wade being overturned or women being functionally unable to get abortions Well, not necessarily a bad bargaining stance. If I can't have equal privilege, then I'll make sure we share equal misery. It's destructive to be sure, but does illustrate how hard it is to coerce someone who has little to lose. I mean, America sends men to prison for missing child support payments.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 03:37 PM
3

Grasshoppa1 is obviously your run-of-the-mill bundle of hate trying to police society and make it as miserable for everybody at it is for her (I'm assuming her genotype here). Funny thing is, her insistence on the child's rights, when her probably pro-choice stance means the embryo is neither a child nor a legal person to her at this point. . Now she's right about it being the law. But laws change. IANAL, but I think Roe v. Wade did not exist before, say, Roe v. Wade. At this point, her comments…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 03:31 PM
9

More realistic threats would probably be "I'll sit on him and steal his lunch".
/r/MensRights04/12/16 03:15 PM
2

This seems to be an entry in a [contest of 4-panel cartoons about the sex difference](http://www.vix.com/pt/bdm/comportamento/522542/12-ilustracoes-que-explicam-muito-sobre-as-diferencas-entre-homens-e-mulheres]. Yeah, I know, some seem to have trouble counting to 4. . I'm not sure I get this one. Does it means that true gender equality can only be achieved by reducing humans to their lowest common denominator? Should we race to the bottom? Go back into the caves? Or climb back up the trees? . I…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 03:05 PM
13

I'd say it's about the same here. Funny thing is, from a cynically transactional point of view, there is absolutely no upside to holding a door for a woman. They expect it, and most things conforming to one's worldview go unobserved. One the other hand, not holding a door has no downside either. Worst can happen is a few female strangers think you're a jerk. So what. Actually, jerk gets you laid more reliably then nice. Obviously, this doesn't apply to people you know or interact with on a regul…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:57 PM
5

We do not want to raise feminist men.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 10:41 PM
9

Well, textbook Mary Sue. Women just eat that shite up, so expect healthy return on investment.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:36 PM
2

The woman may feel pressure to perform pleasure visibly – making more noises Nah, they're just really uncertain about that whole 'sex' thing. Can I bring my cats?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:30 PM
1

Do I have that right? Partially. First, the woman I wrote about could very well still be alive. I hope she is. Second, 'worth' is rational, 'sympathy' emotional, so no one is 'worthy' of my sympathy. It's there or not. Call me a callous bastard, I don't really care, I'm a callous bastard. Third, most 'suicide attempts' in these statistics are basically emotional blackmail and childish tantrums, with no real goal of self-destruction. This may look like I'm splitting hairs regarding the definition…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:04 PM
2

I gather from your post that you are a woman. Women have more contraceptive options, and the only post facto options. Yet you act as though men hold sole responsability. If women have no agency, start by rescinding your right to vote. It's a right for adults. . You also seek to absolve the woman from her responsability in killing a baby. I'll say it again, slowly, so you can understand: she. killed. a. baby. It was slow, it was deliberate, and it was premeditated. If you can defend that, I have …
/r/MensRights02/12/16 10:37 PM
3

It's never too late to run. Or break out the marshmallows.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:21 PM
5

Depends. Sympathy is a limited ressource; four decades of feminism have taught me that. My work implies frequently changing teams, but I consider it a duty to attend funerals for ex co-worker. Which is distressingly often. Mostly 'domestic accidents', cause we're a Christian country. On the other hand, female suicide success rate in Europe is a measly 20%. There's wanting to die and there's whoring for attention. And yes, I'm bitter and cynical, and no, my sympathy is not gendered. There was thi…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:20 PM
10

TL;DR: be a role model for those around you. I don't think there's a big, over-arching solution. Socially awkward young men have become an acceptable target (White) men are an acceptable target. Socially awkward just makes it easier. Since this is driving the need for counter-productive places like TRP and PUA, They're not all bad. TRP advocates self-improvement, such as sports. OK, lifting, they have a collective one-track mind. But they're also proponents of studying, hard work and financial r…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:43 PM
4

These people need to be send to a faraway penal colony, like say, Australia. . Ms Thompson, who fell pregnant to her methamphetamine dealer, is on trial in the Supreme Court accused of murdering Destiny between April 1 and July 19 of that year. Prosecutor Carmel Barbagallo told the court Ms Thompson did not want a sixth child and Destiny’s father wanted nothing to do with her. At least the article is not trying to make her into a victim. The victim is a 3 month-old child, and apparently her 5 su…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 02:05 PM
1

This means they can suspend him, not lawfully suspend him.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 01:44 PM
1

Female suicide rose from 5.2 to 5.4 per 100,000 per year, male suicide has decreased from 16.8 to 16.6. As a note, I'm adding 'per year' to the article's 'per 100,000', because, hey, he's only a journalist, he doesn't have time for basic comprehension of the facts he's reporting. On a totally unrelated note, as witnessed by the ever-increasing of post-40, unmarried women, female self-reliance is at an all-time high. Not high in the absolute, but much higher than say, 1st and 2nd wave feminists. …
/r/MensRights02/12/16 01:14 PM
1

The regressive left will inevitably cannibalize itself. They don't produce anything, life is actually a zero sum game for them, and their social model can only be a grab-fest. I'd be happy to let them, except for the potentially fatal damage they inflict on real people while racing to the bottom. . Obligatory human's rights comment: The editor-in-chief of the Age, Mark Forbes, has been stood down and is being investigated by Fairfax Media Who died and made Fairfax Media the new sheriff in town? …
/r/MensRights02/12/16 01:02 PM
8

Wake me up when they start burning books.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 10:06 AM
6

I keep hearing about this Patriarchy thing. HOW DO I GET MY CARD? Where the fuck was I on orientation day?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:40 AM
2

She's the dog's bollocks. Which I mean in a not-at-all-akward complimentary way, not in a mongrel-lying-with-its-leg-in-the-air-trying-to-gnash-its-own-balls way. Why is it ever so hard to talk about women? . Edit: this is a joke. Although I really do appreciate Mrs Straughn's writing.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:33 AM
9

Regarding Taylor Swift: “She not only delivers with solid music and great live concert performance experiences, but she is also young, poised, beautiful and—so far—relatively non-controversial,” says attorney Lori Landew of Fox Rothschild. “Brands … see her as a safe and reliable spokesperson who is very aware of her brand equity and is strategic about protecting its value.” I will disagree on the "solid music" part, but to each his own. Most of the arguments seem to relate to a model, and she i…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:28 AM
4

Music industry is about marketing, not talent or even 'natural' audience affinity. Females are easier to market, because boobs. Pseudo-exception Adele, benefitted from gynocentrism and fat-acceptance, still underwent extreme physical change. Source: dables in music, has a brain.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:28 AM
4

These men sort of earned men the vote (context: until 1918, only a small part of men had national suffrage, most men and women had parochial suffrage), and around half of women too (ie: Representation of the People Act, 1918). Women were denied the vote if under 30 or other criteria, mostly because the domestic unrest and terrorism of the Suffragettes had convinced the general population that women were irresponsible and dangerous. . So, a century ago, violence was used to send men back into the…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 09:07 AM
2

Sometimes you do need to open up. That's why you have mates.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 08:19 AM
15

"All-male is bad!" says an all-female group. Maybe women should boycott all-male spaces. That'd teach 'em!
/r/MensRights01/12/16 04:50 PM
3

I think you're going to wrong way about it. 'Feminists' are a special interest group, and have no power but that bestowed to them by politicians, in the form of laws, policies, models and 'dear collegue' letters. The only reason I acknowledge their existence is because they got unfair and discriminatory laws passed, to the point that my children will in all likelyhood inherent a (western) world in strife. There is no truce with feminists, because they are immaterial. Our governments and lawmaker…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 04:21 PM
8

I think scott adams analysis of how little facts matter, and how much the art of persuasion does, is powerful. Rethoric vs dialectic, it's older than the Bible. Adams' list is obviously geared toward rethorics or worse. But still, a win is a win.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 03:19 PM
25

We don't express ourselves because nothing dries panties faster than a wet male cheek, and we basically spent our formative years trying to get laid. Also because fighting back yields better odds than crying. Not always the best solution, but that's sort of our thing. So yeah, surprinsingly, men and women share responsability for the state of society. What a revolting development.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:57 PM
6

I do agree, but not condemning Ms Jaye is probably enough to put her at severe odds with her 'sisterhood'. So either she does, or she does not. There is no tentative. Ichi-go ichi-e, and all this stuff.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:53 PM
7

Sure. It's value signaling: look at me, I'm demonstrably fuckable, will you fuck me? Many/most women assert value through external validation, ie: I have a BF/fiancé/husband means "I'm attractive". Men tend to be less roundabout about it, ie: I have a big dick because my dick is big. And mine. . Also, I'm mentioning Americans because they travel more, but it works the other way: a man traveling abroad sees his SMV greatly increased by the fact that he will be gone rather soon. Quick fuck, no str…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:50 PM
2

You are very right. I have grown inured to silver linings.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:42 PM
5

It's called the "let them eat cake" strategy. It has gone out of fashion, though.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:41 PM
13

Maybe,but she's already beyond the pale with this article, so she might as well go all in. No such thing as neutrality in this case.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:40 PM
1

To add context, the Code of Hammurabi is dated back to 1754 BC, so not really new. It also proposed that false accusers be sentenced as appropriate to the crime they made up. . "Holding women accountable" is mostly "upholding the rule of law". It shouldn't be difficult, and shouldn't even need discussing. The current sentencing gap only encourages an 'us v. them' mentality, which can only end badly. So yeah, punishing guilty women should be a priority, because in the long run the pussy pass is p…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 10:44 AM
12

As usual, the journalist comically softens the crime in his reports, and down-plays the female perpetrators' agenda: lust-crazed blond beauty tarty teacher consumed with lust Strangely absent is the word 'rape', as in 'rape under threat'.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:29 AM
6

I'll hold female rapist, particularly of children, to the same standards as their male counterparts: they have access to unlimited porn (it's called the interwebz), and to mastubatory aids (even moreso than men, dildos are empowering). They prey on the weak because the root of their obsession is not sex, but power and cruelty. They are evil. The judges who refuse to commit them to prison and sex offenders registers are accessories to this evil.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:20 AM
6

I hold that the burden of proof is central to true justice: innocent until proven guilty. You point out shame as the main suppressor of male reporting. The shame is mainly in the reporting itself. I'm not sure having to provide proof would make it significantly more shameful. I think the main barrier for male victims is the idea that they won't be taken seriously, their claims will be dismissed, or they will become the accused. Reaffirming the rule of law and reinstating due process can only be …
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:13 AM
9

This is not justice, this is tyranny written into law. Our legal systems are actually not so bad, and must be defended against those who would turn them against the people. Price of liberty.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:07 AM
50

The author is really trying to walk in a man's shoes for a few paragraph, I give her credit, but she still has much of her privilege to check, as her "sisterhood" [dixit] would put it: The perceived silencing of and unfairness meted out to men, particularly when it comes to parental access and financial support after divorce, Emphasis mine. . Then again, her motives are not entirely altruistic: [...] a terrifying prediction which will have widespread ramifications, not just for men in the workpl…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:02 AM
3

wookies Female marines. Them leg hair.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 08:07 AM
5

They have to cheat with someone.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 08:01 AM
5

Do I read so stupid as to think a politician has my "interests at heart"? We already know how the conservative model works, but then again we already know how the self-proclaimed progressive model fails.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 01:14 AM
1

Then again, they fill less than 5% of boxes.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 01:12 AM
19

I used to think so. Then again, the amount of shite I've seen makes the Red Pill crowd seem not so extreme. As an example, and not the most egregious: 2-week job, on site a young woman, 26-27, cute, very proper bordering on uptight, married less than a year, husband deployed in neighbouring country since one month, five months to go, back every other week-end. She proposed sex by the end of week 1. Kinda makes you lose faith in people.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 01:06 AM
2

Feminists: "Trump is the Beast of Apocalypse. The seventh Seal is broken. The end is nigh." Could someone remind them that self-immolation is a very effective form of protest?
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:20 PM
30

Basic Red Pill advice: if your GF spends more than 2 weeks overseas alone or with female friends, consider your relationship ended. Sad, but as a Euro myself, well, American tourists do tell you they have a boyfriend before cheating on him.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:11 PM
7

Main picture is the Eiffel tower. A quick search shows France has 6300 zip codes for 551,000 km2 (643 with overseas territories). That's one zip code every 100 square km / 38 square mile. There must be some serious not cheating going on in France...
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:05 PM
2

Add closing the sentencing gap. Actually, reproductive rights would probably be enough, as it would force the governments to pander to men, as they would become gateways to reproduction while remaining primary producers.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:00 PM
8

Just a hint of how seriously and professionally title IX investigations are conducted: Many of the documents provided to The College Fix were redacted, including the specific account of the alleged sexual assault or assaults. The details are visible as plain text when copied and pasted, though. OK, so they're not technically oriented. The panel’s report says Doe failed to obtain “affirmative consent” in this alleged encounter – judging Doe by a policy that was not in place at the time of the all…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 05:09 PM
14

You're talking America. A 100 lb female is not realistic. 200 is. Losses are higher among draftees than recruits. Nothing new. And you don't have to resort to the fireman carry example to make your point. Female soldiers just suck. They can't even shoot reasonnably. Out of my head, recent USMC assessment, wookies got a 23% first shot at 200 m (or yards). Pathetic. Even POGs scored way higher. The thing is, equal duty is integral to equality. The draft debate could, or should, have forced women t…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:27 PM
11

Archive for those who do not wish to feed the Huffington Post. Female draftee are an operational nonsense, but a moral obligation. By their astounding silence, feminists will again prove they never stood for equality.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:19 PM
26

We're not talking professional soldiers. The draft has never cared about a man's (make it a boy's) fitness for combat. Why should all of a sudden a woman's physical attributes become an argument?
/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:07 PM
1

I don't see the men's right issue in this. According to the article, the police handles these cases competently. Overall, it's just a scam with sex as a bait. We need to extend the definition of safe sex as taught to boys: sex on TV is not safe, we keep falling off the damn thing.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:29 AM
7

"Never depend on a man." (Because they will only let you down). Great lesson. Now young men are learning "never open yourself to a woman because she will stab you in the back". No way this can go wrong. Months made a great deal worse for not letting myself depend on my husband for all of the other, vital help he was offering. Yeah, her suffering is real. On the other hand, she sounds like she cut her husband off his child's early month, but then again, he's just a man, so who cares? Now, I reali…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:26 AM
1

I remember a pub deep down in Germany. Because beer never truly is yours. They did have one stall, though.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:13 AM
4

Because you don't spend as much of your money as a woman would. Would spend your money, I mean. Women in the US account for roughly 30% of taxable incomes and 80% of spendings. Food for thought. You have savings. Bad citizen. I'm sure you don't even have debt, you commie scum you. Maybe even a short loan. . Seriously, society's interest is pretty much orthogonal to any single man's. Main reason our social narrative extolls self-sacrifice as a virtue. Well, male sacrifice anyway. Them kids ain't …
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:02 AM
1

I have a 2-yo, urinals are still a problem :)
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:27 AM
7

Men should vote against Grand Prairie city council at next opportunity, cause they represent discrimination. /s . Seriously, I regularly take my kids swimming, and the overall design described sounds like an improvement on common pool arrangements. Easier for a dad to take care of the kids. On the other hand, urinals are common because they are more cost-efficient and time-efficient. A better solution would probably have been to deploy a mix of stalls and urinals on the men's side, and one or tw…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:58 AM
3

First two lines: Caitlin Weierhauser Smashes the Patriarchy With a Dimpled Smile and Frequent Giggles There are dimples, deep down underneath the fat layer. I mean layer in a geological sense. Her objective as a comic is to poke holes in straight-white-male privilege, and doing so means forcing audiences to confront the sort of shitty things that can’t be wiped away with bleach and Febreze. By definition, her audience have to confront her. . Rest is as usual, I'm so special yada yada fuck white …
/r/MensRights29/11/16 11:45 PM
1

The article's author chooses to make this about his sex, not his species. And by 'spoil', I refer to pushing feminism. It sounds like if he can't be happy, nobody can. . As for "male stereotypes", of course I'm interested in cars. It's a tool I use that can get me killed if not properly maintained. I don't watch sports on TV, I don't even have an opinion on football, which gets me strange looks on a regular basis. Then again, I've never questioned my nature as a man, and to my knowledge, neither…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:43 PM
11

Sure feminism helps men out! It has for decades! Out of their families, out of their homes, out of their money. . I get it you fail as a man, but don't try to spoil it for everyone else.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 05:39 PM
3

By the time you're an adult, genetics are not the only factor.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:54 PM
10

I know. Goes to show, the war of sexes has only losers. And to be honest, it does affect women more: barring necessity (such as female contraception), guinea pigs are men to a large majority. For once, male disposability has a little upside.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:47 PM
2

Investigate. Talking from experience here, I was the short kid with top grades and an angel face, which allowed me to get truckloads of crap past the radar. Wonder what that taught me about society. . As for fear of a lawsuit: I don't know in how much trouble a school can get in for not suspending the 'violent' child. On the other hand, I've seen first hand what can happen when reports of bullying are pointedly ignored. Early teen suicide, his being badly bullied was common knowledge. Parents go…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:43 PM
5

Sadly, you have a point.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:23 PM
35

I don't think sex is really important in this post, especially considering girls are slightly stronger pre-teens. Well, at least taller. On the other hand, I'm deeply impressed by the sense of fairness and zero tolerance pervasive in North American education nowadays: no question, no investigation, just throw the book at the kid that lashes out once in his life. Need to teach them early that there is no justice to be found, and that the only thing that counts is not getting caught. I wonder how …
/r/MensRights29/11/16 01:27 PM
78

I'm going to be that jerk: women are getting what they deserve for letting a vocal minority be their only voice for decades. You can't ask scientists to become martyrs for the cause of women, when it's women who will crucify them anyway. It's not even pragmatic: by not rocking the boat, they at least get results for 48% of humanity, which is 48% more than if they got sacked. . Then again, gender is social construct, so women just have to identify as a non-binary man prior to popping their pills,…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:17 AM
6

RadFems don't serve. They serve only themselves.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:46 AM
8

Funny thing is, I can't really identify with any of the girls or their feelings here, but I don't expect most women to understand the men pictured. Not really. Not Hollywood. Also a bonus for the WWII Wehrmacht. Most German soldiers were just blokes. I think the last one is Warsaw Pact. Peace is built by remembering your enemy's humanity that you had to forget in order to wage war.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:44 AM
6

Happens after the election. Is that the tide of power turning?
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:32 AM
1

Bragging and validation-seeking is the first sign they're sheeple. Now don't get me wrong, it's still a hint to look for. A decent-looking woman craving external validation is a low-effort fuck. Just not what she's aiming for with her comment.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 09:25 AM
26

So yeah, being short is a social disadvantage. So what? Are we gonna whine and ask for quotas? Quotas for what exactly? And this coming from a short guy. I actively abhor fat acceptance. Fatties are free to accept themselves, but anyone trying to femsplain what's supposed to get my dick rigid can go suck a moose. By the same token, well, women are free to not want short guys. My loss. . Actually, the issue is not the lack of attraction, but the hatred some women can show, examplified by the firs…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 08:17 PM
9

Testosterone is a big influence on risk-taking. Risk-taking is a big part of not living in caves anymore. "Toxic masculinity".
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:26 PM
6

And I don't even think Belgium has an upcoming election. General Election 2019? . The piece of crap quotes a just-released European Commission survey on gender violence, but omits interesting findings: Almost three quarters of respondents think domestic violence against women is common in their country (74%). Almost three in ten say domestic violence against men is common in their country (29%), but this masks a wide range of results across Member States, from 61% in the UK to 8% in Bulgaria. Al…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 02:41 PM
1

As opposed to what exactly? Action feminists? All 3 of them?
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:28 AM
12

Moot point. Their first question should be whether a matriarchy can be achieved, and their second whether it would be sustainable. They're arguing from the very safe position of never one day having to actually do anything. The grass is always greener in pipe dreams.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 10:19 PM
8

Actually, MRM is about equality, not hate (and thus the exact opposite of feminism). One of the by-products of equality is that men, who, for at least 2 generations, have increasingly shared in women's burden, will get to share back. Which will increase their quality of life. And is perceived as a threat by feminists, who view life as a zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:28 PM
4

Didn't the brand's owner pull this ad, after realising that pushing both a bad product and a bad narrative on its consumer base with two bad, bad-looking actors was, well, bad for sales?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:21 PM
13

Do they have a nagging hotline?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 01:20 PM
19

Male students now have to help pay for feminine hygiene products due to a "systemic culture of sexism" against males.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 09:14 AM
2

They establish no causality; at first glance, agenda-serving psycho-babble.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 07:57 AM
2

Middle-class value signaling. ENTJ is a fashionable result for MBTI, a "personality analysis test" or some such. Female HR employee's equivalent of bragging about a big dick.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 07:27 AM
1

Well, there is a substantial amount of work that is not taxed. There is also a significant amount of men that are not taxed, or very little. Of course, they do not hold jobs, at least not declared, and sometimes even are on welfare. The financial media have taken to calling this sharp decrease of male participation in the workforce "the invisible crisis of men". It is apparently a bad thing. Also, working, unmarried, childless men demonstrably produce less taxable income, and they're a growing p…
/r/MensRights24/11/16 01:10 AM
4

TL;DR: the Canadian literary scene is a massive circlejerk. Due process is an issue far greater than them, and was established by legal minds far greater than theirs.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 10:36 PM
2

Without obsessing over the "Dear collegue" letter and Title IX kangaroo courts, the rule of law needs to be reinstated in universities. This means due process and fair judgement. This also means that blatant overreach needs to be punished, and it does include the DoE.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 07:46 PM
7

Feminism can currently silence dissenting opinions through shrieking, whining and online brigading. Regulatory laws, while a slippery slope to censorship, would actually even the playing field, allowing for feminists to be silenced in turn, with their all too common "kill all men" outbursts. So yeah, they oppose these laws.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 07:44 PM
2

Is there a war against women?
/r/MensRights23/11/16 04:47 PM
5

Maybe. It's self-defeating, then: men work mostly for their kids (little critters are expensive). Fuck them on the kids, no reason to work as much. I could work 2 days a week and live perfectly fine as a single man. You'd say, women. Yeah. The whole workforce thing never was a big success there.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 04:46 PM
7

Ignore her (assuming here). She's in a position of power, you're not. Remember that power is equalized in the voting booth, that's the whole point of democracy.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:09 PM
6

Because nuclear family is trad-con, ad trad-con provides a decent alternative to progressive. . As a note, 'extended' family is pretty much a tradition in Southern Europe too, albeit maybe not to the extend that I have witnessed in South-East Asia.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:07 PM
45

A 30 sec search with her handle shows she posts about The Sims and constantly seeks validation on social media, dropping buzzwords such as 'Ivy League' or 'ENTJ'. Right. Is unfuckable, probably works HR, and currently crying over mah vagina prez. Oxygen thief. Poster child for far Right vote. Negative net contribution to humanity.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:39 PM
20

Researchers find that paternal involvement in child-care (e.g: poopy diapers and spoon feeding) has no detectable effect on the outcome. Maternal involvement ot tested. Leading to: ‘Involved fathers may influence children indirectly by being a source of instrumental and emotional support to mothers, As a father: fuck you. Fathers help their children by being fathers. By being role models, enforcers of rules and providers of mischief. They're not tack-on accessories for females. Not sperm-sacks, …
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:29 PM
7

I think you missed my point. How long before some stupid cunt (I mean this in an ungendered way) picks up daddy's gun and starts ambushing people? I've seen only the trailer, but it seems to pander heavily to SJW/feminists' perception of always being right by virtue of being virtuous, and vice versa. It establishes a moral high ground for its main characters.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 01:16 PM
15

Advocating vigilante violence in a country with half a billion guns. No way it can go wrong.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:21 AM
3

Haven't seen the show, but well, everybody loves Harley Quinn and Mr J ...
/r/MensRights23/11/16 11:20 AM
5

Actually, all women. All women have the legal possibility of entirely fucking a man over. Actually, many men. It's basically being on the plantation, and the owners have guns. Not all will use them, but some do, and it's a deterent. . The answers are due process and fairness, but as long as the Left thinks it can get elected by pandering to the lowest female denominator, we won't get that. To be candid, I think we're already too late, and the impact of disenfranchised GenY and GenZers will be fa…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 10:44 AM
2

No true Scotwoman fallacy. No we don't assume, we observe.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:33 AM
2

women have been on the inequal end of the stick for a pretty long time Sins of the fathers. Sorry, but I don't pay for my ancestors alleged misdeeds.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:33 AM
2

Feminism is as feminism does, and it's nasty. Also, balance can't be achieved on one side only.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:27 AM
1

This. Funny point that the men most sought as long-term mates by women are also those with the most to lose, and thus the biggest incentive not to marry.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:19 AM
1

Well, this would explain a lot...
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:14 AM
3

The author makes a sane market argument to explain the wage discrepancy in modelling, ie: female models bring in much more money. It's a shame this is not more readily applied to female football teams or male overtime.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:01 AM
22

Data collected in New Zealand, no proof it applies anywhere else, even though likely for the rest of the Western world. My gripe is not that men are the workhorses of society, they always have been. It's that they've been made into its butt-monkeys too, which leads to the question, why bother? Numbers show that more and more men don't, actually, which will destroy the world as we know it.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:52 AM
4

"Where have all the good men gone?" Usually not asked by good women. Because that's where the good men are.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:47 AM
3

Given the fact that most feminists are dykes, Proof required. wouldn't it stand to reason Given all men are carrots, wouldn't it stand to reason my cat is Socrates? that most "meninmists" What are these, and how are they relevant? Men in Mists? would be homo's? Greengrocer's apostrophe. Least of your sins. . Feminism is a power bid based on standard Marxist war of classes. It's the oppression olympics and the glorification of artificial victimhood. Nothing to do with MRM.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:31 AM
3

Higher education is a wasted cause: they grow them stupid from the get-go. These 'students' are high-schooler. Think back, and try to remember if you were that stupid in your teens. . From the letter: to pursue the truth and interrogate rhetoric. Rhetoric is concerned with persuasion; the word they are looking for is probably dialectic If we as a society do you give the unpopular opinions a chance to be expressed then I fail to parse this sentence as English. then we are no better than the autho…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 11:48 PM
14

Well, it's American policy-making at its finest. The built-in checks and balances leave no room for abuse. /s, but seriously, WTF?
/r/MensRights22/11/16 07:57 PM
7

She wonderfully illustrates how much difference makeup, good lighting and a fresh hairdo make. Other than that, what use is she exactly?
/r/MensRights22/11/16 01:48 PM
8

Context: the boy is OK, she thankfully is about as efficient as you'd expect special snowflakes to be. She hasn't been charged for the attempt on the child, but identified as the main suspect; the police may only be building the case at this point. The article doesn't clarify whether she has been charged in the dual hit and run. I'd expect she has. . Then again, she typically threatened 'suicide' to gain sympathy. According to the article, the case 'has attracted international attention', so the…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 08:27 AM
6

There is a war on boys. Males are boys before they are anything-sexual.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 08:13 AM
10

These people basically try to use the justice system for a quick shakedown: they (think that they) have nothing to lose (filing for financial hardship to have their trial paid for them), while their target have much at stake, and have an incentive to settle quietly. Now will the court judge the case presented, or will it push the bullshit and out-of-scope argument that actually prosecuting crooks has a chilling effect on real victims?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 11:27 PM
19

To quote a movie from my childhood: We are unique, gentlemen, in that we create ourselves... through long years of rigorous training, sacrifice, denial, pain. We forge our bodies in the fire of our will. This bloke has Terminator-level determination.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 09:38 PM
17

Man hater creates hate list. Did she steal that klever koncept from the KKK, or was she inspired by Hitler?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:21 PM
4

So, Roe v. Wade is the most attacked opinion in history. And it is still here. Those are facts. You are worried. Feelz. Man up. Deal with it. Doesn't warrant action. As feminism taught us, ressources are always too scarse. . Yes, politics are transactional. Not necessarily. Onkel Carl used to write that war is but the continuation of policies with other means. Sometimes you give more than you get and sometimes you get more than you give. And sometimes you get jack shite for about a century, and …
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:08 PM
8

First, your post reads as a rant against men. Or against Republicans. Men are not responsible for Trump. American voters are, and many men here are not Americans. The person using Congress subpoenas to lean on abortion doctors is Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), apparently a woman. . Second: Roe v. Wade happened under Nixon and a Republican SCOTUS (one of the 2 dissenting opinion was a Democrat, actually); it survived reagan and a pair of Bushes. Is there any sign of an incoming reversal? For now, an…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 02:02 PM
6

No, you're takling about "most men's issues", dixit. . As per your reasoning, most black people in the US are murdered by other black people, therefore the issue is less valid. Or most human issues are caused by humans, therefore irrelevant. . Conflating individual male victims with a 'male' lump category is an extreme form of apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:20 AM
1

Just look around you. Divorce rape, shotgun marriage, suicide, workplace death. These are issues because these are issues, it's all around you.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:12 AM
37

"The most hardcore feminist" bathes in male tears and enjoys the thought of men killing themselves.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:10 AM
4

Men Going Their Own Way look much happier, so maybe their issue don't stem from other men. . Your argument is based on a dubious premise: "If most men's issues revolve around other men", which you'd need to prove. Overall, men don't divorce other men and keep the kids + house.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:08 AM
2

The OP is trying to argue from theoretical feminism: I don't think we hear about this side of feminism enough. Feminism is as feminism does. I'll remain egalitarian. It's just superior in every way.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 03:14 PM
11

There is no such thing as a reverse gap. Unless they mean a collision. But "income collision" makes no sense. No reverse sexism, no reverse racism, it's all plain old bigotry.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:07 PM
12

TEH PERSONAL IS POLITICAL!!! We actually wouldn't care about feminism if it hadn't made itself into law. I'm passively ignoring around 7 billion people, what would a few million more change?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 12:11 AM
9

Speaking about the "pink tax": was shopping the other day, saw a leg-shaving razor for women. Yep, they're expensive alright. Then I saw a body-shaving razor for men: 30% more expensive than the female version. I want my blue tax refund.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 12:08 AM
2

Sanders will push 80 by the end of Trump's upcoming mandate. If he wants a (national) legacy, it must be built in the coming years. Might be a reason for his running with a party in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:27 PM
113

Reality bit the SJW left on the arse. Maher spells it out for them. Still can't see it. Maher literally says "you're outrageous with your political correct bullshit and it does drive people away." Still can't see it. Baseball cap guy outright asks "Do you want to be right or do you want to win?" ("being right" mostly meaning imposing your views on everyone). Still can't see it. Still acts like Trump was elected by hordes of unskilled, white, mouth-breathing, pussy-grabbing, racist, facist men. R…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:30 PM
10

Archive. The author conveniently fails to cite the published paper, so here, and PDF, and finally the supplemental table 4, which shows that indeed 2 out of 3 Major Depression Episode patients were female. . One caveat, though: the authors admit that the assessment is interview-based, and tested for reproductibility, not accuracy. It's very possible that males are socialized to hide depression episodes. Don't forget, confessing to suicidal thoughts to your GP, as a male, is as likely to get you …
/r/MensRights18/11/16 01:22 PM
3

Actually, mostly none. None whatsoever from men, because it's just obvious, and I tend to shun Captain Mangina and his Triggered Brigade. Little from women because, in the rare occasions, I lay my reasonning down less bluntly, and it only takes a handful of days at a client's to know what books people read. The bodice-ripper ranks have positively swollen with the 50 shades crowd. . Selection bias, though, women broaching para-sexual topics during lunch are always flirting to some degree, meaning…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 12:53 PM
3

Well, male is the new black...
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:14 AM
14

Because feminism is all about equality. Between women.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:08 AM
163

In July a federal jury voted to give $28.1 million, plus attorney's fees, to [falsely accused] This must have been one hell of a biased investigation. This would pretty much bankrupt the county (it's more than $1k per resident). . Apparently, the forensic worker whose work got them convicted, Joyce Gilchrist, made a career of sending innocent men to prison or the death row. For 21 years. Confessions were obtained from the accused under threat of the death penalty. Going after the deputies could …
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:04 AM
6

I get the strong impression female feminists really don't find male feminists attractive as a rule. Females don't find male feminists attractive as a rule. And yeah, the Gosling guy. Except he could be a total asshole and still have women fawn over him. He's just a hunk who incidentally claims to be a feminist. . I've made this point before, but 'romance' lit (ie: softcore text porn) is bought almost exclusively by women. Archetypes are the millionaire entrepreneur, the Special Forces bloke, the…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 08:38 AM
3

Dunham has expressed controversial beliefs in the past, Stupidity is not controversial, it's just not popular with normal people.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 08:29 AM
2

Strandhäll commented on the incident on her Facebook page, writing: "We all have a responsibility for setting the tone. This is language we don't accept in a classroom, then we can't accept it in politics either." And the tone is totalitarian langage police. The voting booth is becoming the last standf of free speech. Isn't Sweden, as with the rest of Europe, seeing a sharp rise of its radical right? Coincidence.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 08:25 AM
2

Comedian whatever asked if he thought men could fall for that trick: I think you should never underestimate people's stupidity. People can be very very stupid, or full of [hesitates] naivete. Because showing the least modicum of trust toward your girlfriend is the peak of stupidity, obviously. Or naivete. Moron. Same tool: Hey, that's the American way. We'll buy and sell anything, as long that there's a market for it. I want to buy your first-born. For Moloch. (NB: the Carthaginians probably did…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 07:54 PM
5

Men's rights don't disempower women, but it will curb the privilege of a few. Force them to earn their way instead of whining for attention.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 02:04 PM
3

Y ends in a feminist utopia, though, where women have somehow advanced science so far that they have spire cities and have cloned Yorick. Sort of a letdown. And too be honest, it has the rose-tinted glasses on: the first month death toll would probably be far higher.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 01:55 PM
1

Archive. Maybe we can hope for a high-profile, false accusation case from Pitt. I mean, higher profile than Rolling Stones and Mattress Girl and all. Something with more bang in the end that the Depp-what's her face case. Or Pitt will settle for joint custody, which I could not hold against him.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 09:21 AM
1

That sounds like a swell idea! Let's shoehorn people in the movie industry based on gender and not merit. Better idea, let's make an "all female" movie! Let's shoot a remake, because we are sooo creative! Why not Ghostbusters?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 09:15 AM
19

From the trailer, this movie has a number of things wrong: some women definitely want to rule the world, but women as a whole are not interested in running it, as evidenced by their career choices. Feels too much like work anyway. men started dying off in the '50s, but somehow the current year looks like what we know. With sprawling cities, computers, cell phones and such. Right. Women on the moon too? no men means no war. Right. Try spending a week in a female office. Look at lesbian couples. T…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 09:10 AM
6

I'm not saying women aren't capable of doing the work, That the thing: women, as a whole, right now, are simply incapable of running things. Most of the infrastructure is designed for maintenance by someone with a man's strength; it's not sexism, it's just more efficient. That, and the dearth of female engineers, plumbers or such. This part is not getting better either.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:44 AM
16

The Week the Women Went. They had to create drama for the men (had them set up a kiddie beauty pageant), otherwise life was running smooth, bordering on boring. And they never even attempted a male version, because it was simply suicidal: no police, no firemen, no utilities, no garbage disposal, and so on.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:27 AM
12

More broadly, this is a trend MRM should be wary of. As men's issues become more mainstream, and hence grow to carry political or financial clout, feminism will try to coopt and control initiatives, as they have for gays. Beware the born-again feminist, who will claim to speak for men after pretending to represent the majority of women. It will be important to make clear that these people do not sway opinions or votes, and thus have nothing to peddle to the powers that be.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:21 AM
12

The fantastic part is that so few of them even bothered to vote. They so profoundly expect the world to serve them what they want that they have no concept of actually working the least bit toward it.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:19 PM
1

There are 2 barriers to education There are far more. One of yours is being convinced of your own superiority.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:19 PM
3

Of course she's right. Feminists would be taken a lot more seriously if they stopped being feminists. Except 'feminists' bookends the previous sentence with different meanings. Same as with Swiss cheese, you see: the more Swiss cheese you have, the more holes you get. The more holes, the less cheese. So the more cheese you have, the less cheese you have. Easy.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:43 PM
2

Oh. It's not your job to educate me. Which is fortunate, you would probably suck at it. Women have been in the Legislature almost 100 years And still complain about mah patriaerkee. It's one or the other.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:40 PM
8

MOTHERHOOD IS NOT BIOLOGICAL! /s
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:35 PM
6

Archive. . It's illegal to read men's rights blogs or subs. The Guardian can, because they're journalists. /s . Closing statement: Much has been written about financial hardship turning afflicted white communities into breeding grounds for white supremacist politics, Because equality is supremacy. I mean, feminists would know, they've always claimed to be about equality... but what about when dissatisfaction has little to do with economic circumstance? Gas-lighting: you only think you're getting…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:05 AM
32

Judge Deborah Taylor: "Sure, you got raped, but still you got some..."
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:53 AM
20

When a man files for divorce, he pays alimony. When a woman files for divorce, he pays alimony. Notice an asymetrical incentive to file for divorce? Divorce is the gold that keeps on digging.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:49 AM
3

Laws are still written by men. What's your point?
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:46 AM
9

As articulate and well-constructed her argument is, I'm afraid the author of this piece is one of the useful idiots behind whom feminists hide. One of these persons with whom stimulating debate can be had, and who justifies the Not All Feminists stance. Except she's the minority. Her intellectually honest approach is simply too demanding, hardly rewarding, and does not appeal to the rainbow-haired crowd. . Those card-carrying feminists who display such a dearth of intellectual curiosity, and hon…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:31 AM
18

We want a women's league 'cause we can't compete with male athletes, but we want LeBron James's salary. And endorsements.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:13 AM
7

Fear-mongering. . Roe v. Wade, and Doe v. Bolton , were ruled 7-2 in early 1973 by a Republican-nominated, Republican-dominated (6R - 3D) SCOTUS. One of the dissenting opinions was a Democrat. This ruling has survived: Ford, Reagan, Bush the Elder and Bush the Younger. (I'm listing Republicans only, because Democrats cannot be evil, obviously /s) Since 1973, Democrats have appointed 4 justices, Republicans 9. . So, this is a serious question: what makes you think Roe v. Wade will get overturned?…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:30 AM
53

Man divorces woman: lifetime alimony. Woman cuckholds man: woman not even reimburses man for child maintenance (She earned £150k a year, he still paid £10k a year, she paid back £6k per annum, including damage, no consideration for the man's £50k legal costs) . Woman has illegitimate child. Woman wants money: fatherhood is not biological, pay up. Woman wants out: you're not the father, GTFO. (Bloke was cut off, and the [female] "judge advised him not to appeal the decision.") . Plus switching do…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 09:07 AM
2

The woman's council will contend that the prenup was signed under duress, specifically under the threat of cancelling a wedding that the man was morally commited to, as evidenced by the ring. Actually, just talking to friends about a possible wedding has been considered as proof of such commitment, or 'commitment blackmail'. "Talking to friends" possibly interpreted as "not actively denying when only half of the couple is doing the talking". Yeah, that's fucked up.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:47 AM
8

The judge's opinion is that wedding can be substracted from the ring as money can be substracted from the man. The ring has no moral value. Except of course in the US, where buying a ring before bringing up prenups is ground for throwing them out. Because then the ring has value as a moral contract. Gynocentrism is indeed mysterious.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 08:25 PM
8

True. But people don't act unless they're scared or promised free loot. They don't get scared by small numbers, because they don't see that addressing an issue is better done before it's big. So, inflating the figures is manipulative, but arguably better than letting the house burn down and see how they sleep tonight.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:19 PM
16

It does say "if present trend continues", so at least, it's explicitely conditional.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 04:57 PM
8

TL;DR: man gets played like a fiddle, pays for 17k ring and 85k mortgage within 3 months of meeting woman. And then gets dumped. Woman claims 'abuse', judges finds "that it is not obvious that the gift carried with it the implied term that it was intended to be revocable if the marriage did not take place.” . So there: buy 'em gifts, just not expensive. They're empowered, strong womynz, they can buy the top-shelf stuff for themselves. Or more seriously: do people really see a future in an endeav…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 04:55 PM
6

I know. Then again, it is just as fair that a man would feel discriminated against, and complain, or sue, as has already been done, at least in Europe. Actually, it's fairer, because discrimination has actually occured, hence the successful suit. Female outrage at seeing a kid with a man has no basis except pandering to morons. . Now I get that airlines become stuck in a damned-if-they-do, damned-if-they-don't quandary. The resolution is easy: stop pandering. Until they do, let them lay in the b…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 10:55 AM
8

However it appears that Fordham is not completely satisfied with her apology and may additionally sue her for damages. Because you can't let them get away with an apology. You just don't let them get away.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 10:47 AM
28

The text is gone, but the sub-text will take far longer. I fly rather frequently in Europe, and while airlines have an explicitely "non-discriminatory" policy regarding the seating of unaccompanied minors, they still tend to cluster them on what few women are available. Work trips, not really tourist cities, so, mostly men and few UMs, but still. On the other hand, I've turned down both occasions of having a UM seated next to me. Not my kid, and, given the climate, it does carry a risk. At least…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 10:45 AM
7

Majority is a relative concept. Women make the majority of the overall population. Men are the majority of workers, and the sole gender in many critical areas.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 05:03 PM
2

She choose intellectual integrity, which may be (often is) a financial sacrifice, but probably won't be detrimental to her career as a film-maker in the long run. Then again, vote with your wallet. I'll buy soon as it sells.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:30 PM
1

TIL Bieber's Canadian. I don't think I've cared enough for xir (not assuming here) to actually know where he was from.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 09:47 PM
7

After election day is too late for woulds and shoulds.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 07:42 PM
33

Canada inflicted Celine Dion on the world!
/r/MensRights11/11/16 07:41 PM
1

I do not know whether they are central, but I failed to find comedy. It's callous at best, and more probably talking points.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:47 PM
14

The author of this 'weekly column' apparently has only one article to his name. I'll suppose this is his first week, and quite possibly his last. He manages to actually describe an issue (the education system trying its darnedest to turn boys into women) with a relative empathy for the subject matter (mostly for his younger self, though), and without making it into a female-oppressive issue contributing to the raep kultchur. Surprising when compared to other articles advertised there ("How Trump…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:55 PM
5

Maybe they should ask Canada first. Entitlement.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:36 PM
1

I think sociopathy is a pretty good abnormality of mental function. Agreed, but then again, how do you deal with sociopathy at this level? The jury here apparently decided to lock them up and throw away the key.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:34 PM
7

So, there's one moron on the Interwebz? Let's see how the justice system deals with this.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:32 PM
2

What he is is less relevant than what he does. And what he does here is defend a model that is falling out of favour rather fast; I don't really care whether his better tomorrows are supposed to come from the right or the left. Do you have an argument other than trying to stick labels on either me or the author? Possibly relevant to what either of us has written here? Before you criticize.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 11:28 PM
2

http://www.statisticbrain.com/voting-statistics/, among others, and hoping post-election polls are more accurate.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:12 PM
336

"Sod off," men answer. . Male host: On behalf of all men, I want to apologise Not all man. At least, not me. Female host: It's like they've gotten to the beaches of Normandy, and say "I can't fight, the weather makes me sick" Which never happened. To these people. Who fought, and for quite a few, died, in Normandy. And were all men. And thus, wimps. Maybe she somehow did not pick the best of examples. And doubles down by saying women are concerned about the pill causing blood clots, while hand-w…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:07 PM
22

If there were any truth to that, Amy Schumer would have been the first female POTUS yesterday.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:46 PM
2

The author tries to make a point that is sadly common among all Left and Center self-titled political experts of the estern world: yes, the Left has made society untenable for the common man but no, the common man should not act in revolt against this, because the remedy is worse than the ill better days are coming, somewhere in the future, pinky-swear; in the meantime, keep grinding. . This barely disguised call for self-sacrifice in the interest of (surprinsingly!) Left-leaning so-called intel…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 12:58 PM
10

Just to make a point clear: there are not enough mouth-breathing, cousin-humping male rednecks in the US to carry a candidate to the White House. This is just Leftist hand-waving. Insulting, too. Trump got > 40% of the female vote, ~50% of college-educated vote, and so on.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:04 AM
30

Except it seems Trump did equaly all across the education spectrum. So yeah, half of his "intelectual elite" peers willingly voted for Trump. If the Stanford professor can't wrap his mind around that, well, broad-mindedness results from flattening high-mindedness.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:30 PM
1

So do I, but it also means this has not been proof-read.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:43 PM
1

Is this the highest turn-out in American history? (well, since universal suffrage, anyway) . This does say that Trump received 89% of the votes from registered Democrats, so maybe the figures are not that accurate.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:07 PM
5

Feminists trying to salvage validation from the trainwreck that was supposed to be their ultimate bid for supremacy.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:01 PM
23

They spew hatred and wonder why people don't like them. Also, notice how they can't even be bothered enough to kill someone: they're asking for people to do the dying at their bidding, with no effort from them. Then they'llclaim they're not violent, when they are just lazy and cowardly.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:00 PM
6

Didn't you get the memo? The men (because it's always men) who didn't go out and vote for Clinton are the same male chauvinist pigs (that's what they called shitlords in Clinton's youth) who didn't go and watch Crappy Ghostbusters.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:45 PM
26

I underestimated hate in America will be written many times over and without irony by hate-mongering SJWs
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:20 PM
8

Trump is the great Satan blah blah. All Men Are Like That, yadda, yadda. . The author completely dismisses that the female vote was apparently split down the middle, because No True Scotswoman. She mostly bemoans that society semingly resists identity politics, especially her pet peeve, the sex war. . Clinton only got this far by being smarter and better than every man in the room. Very true. She made sure every room was filled with women. Her sexist refusal of any hint of masculinty (seriously,…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 05:07 PM
5

So what does it say about the country when a womanizing pervert wins the presidency instead of a woman? That the only way for a minority to take control of a country is to first abolish democracy. And that the power of the press is a thing of the past. . To be fair, many of the top comments on this thread point out hwo Sanders could/would have won in the key states, and that Clinton acted like a ruthless, self-serving egotist. The posters just can't bring themselves to state it as plainly. . On …
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:10 AM
33

Feminism has been a supremacy bid for my whole life, and I'm not really young anymore. There is no such thing as neo-feminism: feminism is what it is now, in the same way facism has more to do with Mussolini than the Roman Republic. . Edit: I support equality (of opportunity, not outcome), which basically makes me anti- many things, including feminism. Especially at a time when feminism will try to coopt and appropriate men's issues in a last bid to stay vaguely relevant.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 07:59 PM
27

Because feminism cannot survive in a rational (Western) world. It needs easily-identifiable enemies, as fear is among the best thought-terminating tools around. So, rape culture, misogynists at every corner and so on.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 07:03 PM
9

"Men get put on pedestals for doing things that women can do just as well, But, strangely, women simply don't do these things. But they can. But don't. Because. Maybe because most artists' beginnings are filled with gigs in sleazy venues for a few bucks. Not an easy life when you're entitled to having it all simply by virtue of being female. 80 per cent of indie labels are managed by men More men get off their sorry arses than women? "Ultimately it's about looking forward and empowering these wo…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:42 PM
6

throughout musical history You forget Johanna Bach, Amadea Mozart and Petra Tchaikovsky.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:30 PM
2

2 comments announced, only 1 visible. Someone is shadow-banned.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 10:34 PM
3

Feminists are nothing new. They're not even a cause, just a symptom.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 05:07 PM
1

Never said the process required an external force.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:04 PM
5

Actually, I think an IMD Parliament speech would be an appropriate occasion to propose Mrs Pizzey for an honour.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:40 PM
7

Spain is pretty fucked up too. This said, it's probably better to be an Aussie, Canuck or Spaniard than, say, live in Mali, Rwanda or Nigeria.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:22 PM
12

That's a sociopath who happens to be a woman. Most gold-digger get their money through courts, family judges are the hitmen.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:02 PM
9

Which begs the question, what do feminists have to lose by letting men have a day? Mostly, everything. Their rethoric is based on thought-terminating clichés. debating would turn them into thought-terminated lies. . This quote by an Mrs Ally Fogg, summarizing feminism in politics: “Surely they realise that such swipes barely tickle at the men in designer suits who run the banks, the governments and the corporations, while cutting deep at the homeless, the desperate, the suicidal, the young victi…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 12:59 PM
9

In other news, most women are human beings of average intelligence, on the average. I'm convinced there's a silent majority of women that are fed up with the way society's been going. Their only sin is being silent, leading to tepid support of decisions against their best interest. Then again, I also think a majority of men are not pleased with the way things are, but afraid to speak up.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:20 AM
2

This costume does not pass the most basic of tests: don't go for sexy-anything when you're fugly.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:12 AM
2

The article points out the distance between MLK and BLM. The author concludes: it's time for sensible people to start reshaping the debate. A clean start means taking out the trash first...
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:09 AM
3

According to the article, no effort was made by Harvard to communicate with the football team. They just killed their season without a warning for something that is not even illegal. Because they can. Which is nowadays the take-away from campus life. Might makes right, and it's OK to rain down hatred on whoever if you're in power.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:49 AM
3

The left has not become. This is the left.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:42 AM
36

Then again, Title IX is not meant to be a shield, but a weapon. Against boys & men, specifically.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:34 AM
1

Not dismissing her, but I'll agree with /u/morpheustech: she completed her M.A. in 2013. Two minor articles and a Ph.D. project in late 2016? Not exactly fast track. Then again, who knows?
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:32 AM
1

Some people's value is really, really low. This is the usual cycle: society becomes rich, selective pressure becomes null, people grow complacent, lazy fucks allowed to fuck lazily, lazy fucks become a majority, society collapses. We're at the decadence stage.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:24 AM
2

Feminism works like a sect. It's single purpose is power and personal enrichment for its self-proclaimed leaders or figureheads. Ultimately, it does not 'hate' men as much as it needs to demonize them in order to achieve power and exploit their productive abilities. Then you have the 'officers', who won't achieve critical mass to make it a career, but leverage the damage to society for their own gain. They are the supremacists. And as with any sect, the rank and file are believers. These do hate…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:11 AM
8

Child support is all about money. If children are raised on welfare, the government has to hitch the taxes up, which is detrimental to the economy, and politicians hope for a renewed mandate. By claiming child support, you focus the 'tax' on one given man, and thus remain popular with the majority. The threat of prison actually is an incentive to work more, and thus produce more money, that will be spent by the mother, so it's actually beneficial to the economy. In the way slaves are beneficial …
/r/MensRights04/11/16 07:59 AM
1

Well, Fukushima 1. And Tchernobyl. And Three Mile Island...
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:21 PM
2

You need to change physician? What country do you live in? And seriously, what 'authorities' would he be obligated to report to?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:35 PM
1

Women have a thin majority among the obese. They are louder about it because they more easily feel entitled to have the world shaped around them.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:12 PM
7

If you keep pushing men into lifelong debt on the whims of women, the streets will be empty. For good. This is Shibuya, in tokyo. 50 years from now you'll have half the people and twice the average age. In 20 to 30 years, European countries will start fighting over newborns and young, fertile couples. Germany already does.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:08 PM
12

Context: this is the judge's comment to his decision. Because chivalry is inscribed in law in the US. /s
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:41 PM
3

Actually, most of the heavy infrastructure, and especially nuclear reactors, are programmed to default to a safe mode when unmonitored or unmaintained. 'Safe' in this case meaning 'off'. Killing the people inside and destroying the consoles will just cause a reactor to shut down. Supposedly. Almost happened in Fukushima 1 after the earthquake. Except the following flood disabled the safeguard mechanisms.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:40 PM
63

Actually, no. Men should be required to opt in having their kid. Same as women. Which means: no more implied consent, ie: commonly heard "if he had sex, he deals with it". Explicit consent. Same as women. Else she can keep it, but he's off the hook. 'parental discrepancy' means no obligation. Babymama wants money? She goes after the biofather. No woman is made to pay for a newborn not her own. thus, obviously, genetic testing at birth. Cause it carries a risk for the fetus if done before. Mother…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:34 PM
7

And you forgot a big one: as a man, you never take a female assistant. Or protégé. Or whatever. Noone you need to spend too much time with, especially out of office hours or behind closed doors. Which is problematic as those in position to be mentors are more often men. There is a systemic bias against women in the workplace. Feminists should know. They engineered it.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:32 PM
1

Sure, and it's completely on the same level of controling behaviour that this Brit bloke who's been hit and burned by his wife for years. An example, not the best.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:10 PM
4

Ah, the anti-fat-shaming crowd. These women complain that showing off your visible belly outline in public will yield snarky remarks from passerby. wearing a bikini as a fat kid might mean your "friends" decide to turn their backs on you. When all they mean is they can't get laid. Or their drinks paid for. Whatever. Their bane are not trolls, but all these men who just ignore them. The paradoxal invisibility of your basic land whale when it comes to 'male gaze'. What they really, really want is …
/r/MensRights03/11/16 06:22 PM
9

I think she might have put in a little legwork.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 04:51 PM
25

You can buy a house in china, but the commute's a killer.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 04:49 PM
2

I'd like to say I feel your pain, but I don't think I can. Family courts are the lost circle of Dante's Inferno.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 02:31 PM
2

A fantastic post, but then again, I'm very partial to Mrs Bitch. . Tired example, but still true: the Beeb shot The Week the Women Went, about some Canadian hamlet living without women for a week. A rather uneventful week, except the ludicrous hoops the men were made to jump through. They never shot a male equivalent. Because one day would be bloody dangerous. One full week would be near irrecoverable, in terms of damages to the infrastructure and, possibly, crime. Week 2 gives you the first epi…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 02:28 PM
2

Good point. I'm on the older side, I'm still struggling with the notion that this is the system, not a temporary malfunction.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 02:14 PM
2

It would lend credence to the 1 in 4 statistic then. Maybe even 1 in 3. Although I don't know about the younger generation. I'm a married spud.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 02:03 PM
5

Good Golly, this almost sounds like a war on men!
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:59 PM
3

That would be easy for me to say. Then again, my choices might be different, were I a young american today. Sleeping around might be a poor substitute for fatherhood, but you don't really know this until you've had kids of your own. At least I didn't. . Telling men that the system is rigged against them, them's the breaks and man up, well it's morally unacceptable, and demographically irresponsible.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:57 PM
2

Two objections: starfish begins before actual sex, sometimes even before foreplay. starfish happens at the first (and therefore, last) instance of sex.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:22 PM
1

You might be slightly insane. Hilarious, but differently normal.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:19 PM
1

This bloke is much funnier than this woman.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:18 PM
8

Catch-22! Those who don't ask are deadbeats, those who do are abusers. These people have mistaken Kafka's Trial for a textbook. The only winning move is not to play. The family court system will soon promote MGTOW.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:12 PM
2

Do they have a deck of cards with pictures and a hitlist too?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:06 PM
271

In China. Where a house can be bought for the price of 20 iPhones 7, apparently. . She wasn't looking for "control in a relationship", here, just easy money. Pretty sure she dumped the 20 blokes. Important point, just not the best example.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:05 PM
12

Of course not all women. there weren't enough rubbish bins and bushes for everyone... . This looks more like a generational problem than an gender issue, though. The lads aren't that classy either. Maybe we should teach the college crowd that pissing in the bushes at a formal event is frowned upon. This could actually elevetate the curriculum.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:58 PM
28

Apologies to these 19 men for my callousness, but they're not really an issue. The real issue is that it's far more than 19 cases. Rape claims are on a sharp rise. Far as we know, between 10 and 90% are false. Some demonstratibly false cases have enjoyed wide media coverage. To compound the issue, society's response to this is questioning the presumption of innocence, hand-waving the burden of proof, eschewing responsability for proved liars, and ruining the accused men's lives. This does read l…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:53 PM
5

Actually, starfish can also reproduce asexually. And yes, some women think that just being there is enough participation in sex. Not that they don't necessarily enjoy it, and different from 'awkward but willing'. It's just that they feel entitled to being pandered to. Needless to say, this sort of sex is a one-off and a hard next. Massive red flag.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:03 PM
1

Women overall make crap soldiers. Then again, male conscripts are not so good either. . Your answer is textbook 'equality feminism': theoretically for, but excuses. Sex-based excuses, too. My participation in the military was "most helpful in other service branches, because my physicality" (I'm a wee lad) and big brain-boxity (I was a POG). Your excuses should apply to me, except they don't, because they're rationalisation for the safety of your in-group. Then again, I once came about three poun…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:35 AM
1

The fact that for most of Democracy's history women weren't given the right to vote? Universal suffrage is a very recent developement in democracy. Suffrage has long been tied to (supposed) participation in society, usually by contributing to taxes and/or military endeavours. So, for most of democracy's history, most men weren't given the right to vote either. At the time of the now whitewashed Suffragettes, British women had a right to vote at the parochial level, where most everything was happ…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 10:45 AM
5

Well, feminists are opposed to gays still having a vote in the power structure they built. And gays have a hard time being anti-men. So basically, lesbians have divorce-raped gays, and claimed custody of the movement. So much easier than building their own.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 10:26 AM
11

Because each and every man's underlying motive for having kids is not to pay maintenance. nothing to do with wanting to see their kids. . If she's afraid the family court system could be gamed, well, she's correct, just not looking at right side of the equation.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 10:20 AM
2

Posted before, same comments: applies to New Zealand, likely the same pattern elsewhere, but unproved women as a whole do contribute to the tax base, but their net lifetime contribution, again as a whole, is negative, ie: they get more out of the system than they pay.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 09:03 AM
6

This was easy. Feminism has too long hidden behind miserable women abroad, and domestic useful idiots.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:57 AM
2

I love feminism. First-wave feminism was amazing. True. Also, the seeds of evil were there from (almost) the start. primarily on gaining women's suffrage "On gaining women suffrage". Call me pedantic. Also, the suffragettes throttled the suffragists, who wanted universal suffrage. Men and Women. Not just (married, suffragette were far from an universal movement) women. The seeds of evil had already grown. What disillusions me most about modern feminism I'm old. I remember Reagan. I saw Bowie pla…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:40 AM
6

OK, nutshell: attractive men (attractive includes rich or high status) can afford to treat women like most women attempt to treat men. That's basic market law: the top 20% men are in demand from the top 95% women. But ... women are salty about it. Because they're all unique goddesses entitled to Brad Clooney- . The author gives the usual one-sided accounts of rejection, because nobody's ever the villain in one's own story. I don't know, maybe she's rejectable. And she's angry that Orlando Di Cap…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:06 AM
3

I think University of York would rather not talk. Not to the likes of you.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:54 AM
6

"Sexism" is an attempt at a thought-terminating cliché. Why doesn't he call for people to judge his favored candidate with reason instead?
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:26 AM
5

There are no events planned for International Men’s Day This term we launched an integrated campaign to highlight the positive steps all students can take to look after their mental health So, despite suicide being a overwhelmingly male issue, they treat it in an ungendered way. They treat their male students as they do their toilets: they're either unisex or non-inexistent.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:24 AM
1

So they find that supporters of Trump, the most unPC condidate in the history of political correctness, are actually not politically correct, maybe even actively against the standard SJW shaming and thought policing. I'm stumped, because, well, you can stump me :)
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:17 AM
1

I'm good that way.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:13 AM
5

Maybe they should try exorcism. "The power of Big Red compels you! By the names Ford, Sarkeesian and Quinn, begone, shitlord! But leave your wallet here." . Or they could undergo the long journey up their own arse, and reclaim their heads.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:06 AM
18

Only men can be bad in bed Two words: starfish sex.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:01 AM
11

Your future looks bleak. On the plus side, pubic lice won't be much of a problem, comparatively speaking.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:55 PM
3

In reality, the gender wage gap is more accurately described as a gender earnings gap. Good start. [Discrimination] is not at the epidemic levels the mainstream media would have you believe. Not unreasonnable. Part of the gap is caused by full-time working women putting in fewer hours than full-time men. Still strong. Gallup suggested employers stop caring so much about the number of hours in the workplace and focus more on the actual work that they do — that is, rewarding productivity instead o…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:52 PM
0

To be fair, the pill was a bad idea, that cannot be criticised because it's a Tool of Women's Empowerment (tm). But I wouldn't have given 1st gen pills to my dog. Partly because it was male, though. Also because neither of us was born. Current generation (4th) is not exempt of side effects, even to the point that some postulate 2nd was better. But too much politics there to have science. I can't fault women for wanting to avoid this. I know I would too.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:42 PM
19

Well, she doesn't shave either, so for one month, she's batting for yet another team: ours!
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:34 PM
1

It was even two men who discovered DNA. Technically, there was a woman involved, and she did the heavy math. Goes to show.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:30 PM
8

back to when mice and humans had a common ancestor. Well, we still do... But yeah, the streamlining began long before homo sapiens. Lean mean gene machines we are.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:27 PM
3

Not a chromosome per se, but yeah , mitochondrial DNA is purely matrilineal, and the Y chromosome purely patrilinear.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:25 PM
8

Feminism is the opium of half the people! . Also, religion is regarded as true by the common people, false by the wise, and useful by the rulers - Seneca.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 05:33 PM
13

Nice catch.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 04:32 PM
25

It's not meant to be true, just to be irksome. Although, if memory serves, an embryo will go female in the absence of a Y chromosome. Extra X patients (XXX) are phenotypically females; Klinefelter's (XXY) are male, albeit developmentally stunted.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 04:31 PM
4

Except among women with breasts and a need for attention. The article mentions Katty Perry. I don't see her going flat any time soon. But there is a trend towards smaller breast implants currently. Until someone plays the meta-game and starts going big again.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 03:25 PM
2

Is this it?
/r/MensRights02/11/16 01:39 PM
183

Archive, as I'd rather not dignify the BBC with traffic over this. Especially eugenistic drivel poorly disguised as pseudo-science. . Compare this to the female X chromosome which still carries around 1,000 or more genes. The human genome is approximately 3.2 billion basepairs long (haploid), with around 20k protein-coding genes. Paris japonica's is 150 billion. The marbled lungfish's 133 billion. Polychaos dubium's a bloody amoeba, clocking in at 670 billion basepairs. A mere potato has over 39…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 01:22 PM
10

Crap, you got it. We need men to pay for things.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 01:02 PM
3

Your link doesn't work for me. Also, archive. . This research provides a basis for different (in fact, opposite) effects of at least some neurotransmitters in males and females. It follows that the best therapeutic option may be different according to sex, I don't see a problem with this. . I do take exception to the obligatory Daily Mail comment that NEWBORN GIRLS HANDLE STRESS BETTER THAN BOYS Yeah, sure, females are superior in every way, except men build this world, so maybe a little more st…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:09 AM
5

Oh, I think america went the same way. They changed 'positive discrimination' to 'affirmative action', because discrimination is illegal and had been challenged in court. Then they declared affirmative action legal and no grounds for a suit. . Thing is, I don't think there is a reasonnable way out of this. Reason is a sign of weakness. SJWs are children, with no boundaries. Or, as the Red Pill puts it, feminism is one massive shit test. The only way to stop this is to put a foot down. Actually h…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 11:02 AM
2

Sure. I checked: France has laws against pot and prostitution. Therefore these things do not exist in France. /s But harsh penalties will include prison time. I'm sure France is willing to send 10% of its men to jail. Will solve unemployment.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 07:38 AM
1

Cat. Box.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 07:20 AM
2

Today a former critic of International Men’s Day (IMD), Joseph Gelfer, says it’s time for feminists to cautiously embrace the day. Because men are getting a voice of their own, and we absolutely need to speak in their place and exploit their issues for our own gain, as we have always done with minorities before. Also because we may very well be headed for a public confrontation which will destroy us, and I can't find a real job with my Feminist Macrame Ph.D. . If men's issues go mainstream, whic…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 12:58 AM
6

Oh, I'm the one saying this directly. This is called lobbying. Depending on where you live, it's more or less overt. Feminism is a pretty powerful lobby, as politicos think virtue-signaling will garner them support. Hey, it looks you can maybe even ride it to the White House. Do you think the differences in funding for breast and prostate cancer are the will of the majority? How do you think laws like VAWA got passed? These things are not subject to vote, only to influence. And influence is what…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 12:49 AM
3

There are two tricks: have a steady increase in population. Men have their best years between 25 and 55, and women between 45 and 55. You count on these (supposedly ever increasing) segment to offset their elders. this is domestic debt. Convert it to foreign-owned debt. There are ways to make foreign debt disappear. Or seem to. Some don't even involve war. . Point 1 is the main reason male contraception doesn't exist, and lifetime alimony / abusive child support does. Point 2, well, it's complic…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 12:22 AM
1

The 'female viagra' pill is basically a self-provided roofie...
/r/MensRights01/11/16 10:21 PM
9

It's a vocal minority. They get laws passed and budget voted. They're an functional majority.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 10:20 PM
2

Don't forget the Sides of March. The pun is just smashing.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 10:15 PM
55

And unsurprinsingly, the legality of a men-only work space is immediately questioned. Which is a good thing. I don't think an argument can be made to shut them down that wouldn't immediately apply to women-only spaces. Except a very blatantly sexist argument, that is, which in itself would be a good thing too.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 10:10 PM
3

I'd say Amazon, or iTunes, or some such. I heard they were planning digital distribution at some point.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 10:05 PM
4

SJW is short for "social justice warriors". These people are the furthest you can be from 'warriors', and have nothing to do with 'justice'. They do use social networks, though, so .5 out of 3, I'd say the name is sarcastic. . Edit: I still don't see how the link is relevant, though. I get a thread about dildos and fisting.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:22 PM
2

And this is why kids need fathers in their lives, and why said fathers have to be men, not manginas.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:21 PM
24

Women, as a group, pay taxes. They just cost (a lot) more over their life than they pay, whereas men are overall net contributors. And this figures exclude 'hidden' taxes such as lifetime alimony. Also, this research is relevant only to New Zealand, although I don't doubt most Western countries follow the same pattern. There's a reason "welfare queen" is more often heard than "welfare king", after all.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:18 PM
8

Of course. Governments are afraid of male contraception. It will severly impact birth rates and redistribute social power. The same way female contraception did back in the '60s.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:10 PM
5

Which is exactly why women as a whole have an incentive to suppress this type of behaviour, or at least getting caught. Men will be (even more) reluctant to commit if faced with a significant perceived risk of raising another's kids. The same way the widespread threat of divorce rape is driving men out of marriage.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 07:04 PM
8

A fair point. From what I heard, French genetic testing is enough to sustain the activity of several Spanish firms. Because French courts cannot claim jurisdiction over what is done in Spain, especially when it's not illegal in Spain. I'm not sure results obtained this way can be produced in a French court (probably not), but they can be produced in a court of public opinion. . Cuckholdry hits a very raw nerve with men; I don't think the French ban would hold very long if the 10 to 15% figures w…
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:58 PM
2

I'll borrow TRP terminology: orbiters don't get laid. Chads do.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 03:20 PM
25

No proof needed when there's no kid. . As for getting pregnant with another man, I think the hay days of cuckoldry will soon end. Widely available genetic testing and the internet will probably lead to a swift backlash of women against women who get caught. Because each woman getting caught pregnant out of her relationship will decrease the value of all women, through the belief that men hold that their kids are their own, and thus their willingness to commit.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 03:19 PM
2

The article suggests that two neurotransmitters have opposite effects in male and female brains. Hinting for a possible cause for men and women reacting overall differently to a given (stressful) situation.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:39 PM
6

Once again, oppressive patriarchal science contradicts feminist ideology. Then again, neurotranmitters are social constructs. /s
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:34 PM
2

Jacques Attali is a (more or less self-defined, he appears mostly skilled at blowing his own horn) French Socialist hinker. Yeah, I know, oxymoron. The current French Socialist head of state has an updated approval rating of 4%. Four percent. I'm not sure this Attali person has much public traction.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:30 PM
71

People currently mocking nascent male birth control will be crying when it becomes reality. No more 'oops' pregnancies. Think about it.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 02:27 PM
3

The issue is ideology, not gender.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:31 PM
2

Most people won't "take time to understand the manosphere correctly". That's the reason focus is needed on problems and solutions, not on personal stance.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:28 PM
1

You are quite right. "College degree" also supposedly means status. Because, you know, as women, they deserve it all.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:26 PM
13

College degree supposedly means money. Not that women look for money. It's a pure stroke of luck that they mostly marry up. They ask how much you make because small talk about the weather is so 20th century.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:48 PM
2

War is but the continuation of policy with other means - Carl von Clausewitz. Although by 'war' here, I just mean 'remove gendered laws, and let things work out by themselves'. Which is oppressive only when the mere idea of carrying your own weight sounds odious.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 02:34 PM
10

Feminists come as conquerors. They don't want balance, they just want everything. There can be no dialogue with those who would enslave you. . Nor need there be, actually. The Western world will soon basically be faced with choosing between the feelz of self-proclaimed social justice warriors, and the demands of men. This choice will be based on utility, not ideology. I don't think there will be much contest between those who produce and those who steal.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 02:30 PM
1

Actually, no, let feminists plot and whine to get screenings cancelled. It will be distributed online anyway. And do advertise the cancellations. Australians have a right to know about these self-proclaimed 'moral' censors that are allowed to rule Australian public life. . People need to take the rose-tinted glasses off, and see these people for what they are.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:26 AM
1

In brief, yes, of course misandry ‘is a thing.’ Right. No, of course misandry as ‘a thing’ is not a mirror image of structural misogyny within a patriarchal society And we have hand-waving. And patriarchy dogma. Of course, Western women do suffer from a strong negative misogyny, leading to them being given preference over men in about everything. . The author tries to make a point that the MRM being silent about Calais migrants is equivalent to feminists being silent about the other 3 billion wo…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 08:51 AM
32

I'm endlessly amused by these morons blaming the ills of industrialised civilisation on men, while enjoying its benefits, that obviously are nobody's fault.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 08:36 AM
1

I wouldn't go that far, but every totalitarian power needs its militia. A privileged caste given a little power, both as means and as incentive to defend the despot and his oppressive power structure. Call them Stasi, call them Politburo, call them Tonton Makout. Or call them feminists and SJWs.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 08:30 AM
6

Mostly good advice, except, well, not specifically feminist. Actually, several points that I apply to raising my kids, only ill-formulated and steeped in ideological rethoric. Main among these: she thinks her advice good, and thus feminine, probably as opposed to masculinity = bad she thinks her advice good, and thus extends it only to females, for females. . Also, 'reject likeability'. Oh, yes, peer pressure and social conformity, the great oppressors of women. By women. Because nobody is faste…
/r/MensRights31/10/16 08:25 AM
4

On the other hand, the family court system has a very real incentive to help perpetuate domestic violence and divorce. I mean, it's not like these people could find another job...
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:50 PM
9

Interestingly enough, there's still (in the US) twice as many women than men who just don't enter the workforce, to nobody's outrage.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:42 PM
7

"it's almost impossible to imagine how much more could the pendulum swing to the lunacy end." Bad news is, it's lunacy at both ends... GBut the pendulum will probably swing back in a brilliant example of two wrongs not making a right.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:36 PM
8

Is it the fabled Matriarchy? Is it a glitch of the interwebz that my man-eyes can see this? . So, women exhibiting in-group bias. What a surprise.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:33 PM
7

Nothing helps your upcoming trial like doubling down against evidence. He should just cut the middleman and give money directly to the plaintiff.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:30 PM
2

Actually, I work with some women that are not these women. Women who successfully embraced STEM careers. Women who earn and inspire respect, and don't feel entitled to it. Women who actually think current feminism is infantilizing and insulting. We've talked about the American debate about extending selective service to women. My colleagues agree that it would only be equality. They also say they'd oppose such a proposal in our own country, if it ever surfaced. With no rational argument. Thanks …
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:27 PM
1

Also, the article makes the implicit hypothesis that 'feeling' discriminated against is ungrouded. Handwaving. People whose arse is really in the fire feel the burn too.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:15 AM
3

Spot on. Look how calling them 'deplorables' has forged an identity for Trump voters.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 10:12 AM
24

Women want selective equality, not selective service.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:13 PM
8

More to do with common decency than men's rights. And I fail to see the point, politically speaking: he's a 70-odd bloke in a swimsuit, he looks like a seventy-odd bloke in a swimsuit, there's no big revelation.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:10 PM
2

Great. They can cut their own foreskin. Or not. Their bodies, their choice.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:02 AM
8

Actually, quotation marks kinda indicate quotation. Not to be confused with parroting marks. What exactly do you think Obama meant by her remark? Men have to be better providers, because riches ain't gonna produce themselves, and if men start not doing what they've always done, women will have a choice between work and starvation. She wasn't condescending, by the way. Condescencion implies some amount of inate equality. You can't condescend to a workhorse. She was just incredibly entitled. Proba…
/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:00 AM
6

Who's to say they don't break them afterwards? Maybe wookies are just inefficient.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:53 AM
14

MRAs, MGTOWs, PUAs and Red Pillers are all different things, with different objectives. But people want the world in 140 characters or less, so all will be lumped together. Men's Rights are about solving problems. Focus on facts, focus on the problems, and focus on solutions. Men bear the brunt of workplace death, of war death, of peace death, even of expected delay before natural death. If you think this is an issue, I don't really care if you identify as a MRA, a feminist, an egalitarian, a Hi…
/r/MensRights28/10/16 10:23 PM
10

Herbivore men have basically disavowed the 'traditional' Japanese society, and gone their own way. No wonder said society disavowes them back. Same will happen with western men who don't stick to the grind. Actually, is happening already. "Men have to be better".
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:46 PM
29

Wookies break your arms if you don't let them win. Feminists whine and shriek. Can we have wookies?
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:41 PM
5

... and then they cry when companies go bankrupt.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:18 PM
3

Amateur! I'm currently typing with my gun :-) . Since nobody will read this thread, I'd like to point out that I often find your comments hilarious. At least we'll have enjoyed the decline in some way.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:41 AM
16

Now we know what the opposite of "friend with benefits" is.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:34 AM
3

Seconded. Banter, no hand-wringing.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:25 AM
3

At the same time?
/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:13 AM
5

Rich men can marry rich women. Statistically, women marry up. Being attractive as a man gets you laid and often looked down upon as a fluff piece, same as a woman.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 07:12 AM
13

Women are still deciding whether marrying money is plan A or plan B. Men's plan B is starving. Can I give back my Patriarchy decoder ring?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:07 PM
2

It's regretable, as it gives the act a semblance of history and legitimacy. Good movie, BTW.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:11 PM
-3

Except Mrs Robinson was 35 yo Anne Bancroft (who, by the way, was hot as hell) seducing 29 yo Dustin Hoffman. So not exactly cradle-snatching, even though the characters were supposed to be a bit farther in age. Still, morally awkward sex between consenting adults. And Simon & Garfunkel soundtrack. Though it might not be the best thing for the sex part. . No comparison with grooming and abusing a 13 yo boy. People really need to stop spewing this cliché.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:53 PM
1

They talk about adding an exception. Exceptions in law are like paradoxes in logic: they can and will be grown arbitrarly big, until they render your whole system inconsistent. Also, I'm trying to recall when exceptional tribunals have been a good thing. Nah, slippery slope.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:24 PM
5

Good news, but not there yet. . However, the treatment was judged to have unacceptable side-effects, including depression, acne and increased libido How much of an increase to be termed unacceptable. And, well, varied side effects: both depression and increased libido, probably not in the same patients.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:18 PM
2

Well, this is the UK (actually, just England and Wales), so, no 5th. Then again, I think the right against self-incrimination originated from there, so it probably still exists. . But yeah, keep silent, let the police discover or invent proof of your guilt in a totally unbiased way that discounts any exonerating element, and go to prison. American Title IX in British courts.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:29 PM
4

And then we slip into Spanish Inquisition, Catch-22, Kafka overdrive. If the accused was able to mount a defence, Your Honour, it is because he knew his accuser's identity. How would he know, unless he was guilty?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:11 PM
3

Invest in torches and pitchforks.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:05 PM
29

SJWs are challenging the presumption of innocence left and right (well, mostly left). No principle is safe from these people. No law is safe if we don't defend it. Eternal vigilance, price of liberty and stuff.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:05 PM
8

It probably goes back far farther than this, but my Greek is exactly what it once was: inexistant. Actually, the Code of Hammurabi (around 37 centuries ago) states (excuse my Akkadian): If any one bring an accusation of any crime before the elders, and does not prove what he has charged, he shall, if it be a capital offense charged, be put to death. And other stuff that imply the accuser was part of the process. And also that you don't mess with a Babylonian. False rape claims probably were pret…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:03 PM
16

Is alcohol what causing sentence?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:56 PM
6

Swift's calves then. Same scenario. Does it become OK? You'd need a crowd of thousands to find her boobs anyway.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:52 PM
4

It's not just about knowing your accuser's name. It's about your council having access to the information relevant to him doing his job. If they 'protect' the name, then they'll protect the day, and the place, and so on.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:41 PM
1

Well, shifting goalpost...
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:55 PM
5

Or: let us turn the justice system into our own militia. I was born too late and missed Woodstock. Some people were born too late and missed the Spanish Inquisition whose chief weapon is surprise, surprise and fear...
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:03 PM
2

A majority being racist towards a minority is, well, racist. A minority being racist toward the majority, well, maybe they don't have a good grasp on the real world. Or no sense of self-preservation. We have these in Europe too. Then again, we also have the fastest-growing far right parties. Sheer coincidence. It's social physics: for every action there's an opposite and totally out of proportion reaction.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 02:54 PM
1

Nice vid. I like how they're chanting about "people united". Except for those of the wrong colour. Textbook mob. And that black guy explaining that "it's not about you". Course. Racism isn't about individuals. . Quick search show Berkeley at $18k to 60k a year. Without accomodations would be my guess. How oppressed are these people?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:02 PM
1

Wow. I (stupidly) assumed campus composition to be about American average, ie: 2/3 to 3/4 white. . Are the people blocking that bridge still a majority outside university grounds? Cause their actions may have consequences beyond their 'safe space'.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 12:23 PM
3

These are worldwide figures, which will be used as-is by comparatively rich, Western women, obviously. Interactive WEF report and PDF version. . Edit: the PDF is quite a long read. Interesting fact: the female/men ratios don't seem to go above 1.0. Educational achievement for the US is listed as 1.0, when I'd expect more of 1.5 (.6 / .4, for 60% of female graduates). Overshooting equality is apparently not an issue. The real ratio is quoted p. 356: 1.37 in tertiary education. . Edit 2: as pointe…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:05 AM
1

But Malcolm would come forth from his.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:33 AM
3

Actually, the solution is accountability for one's actions. Call them racists and call the police.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:32 AM
0

Not these days. Was in the US under (late) Reagan. Being nerd + jock (65/35, but still) caused endless kernel panics.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:29 AM
206

This one's good. Because some of these pre-emptively guilty men were able to mount a defence, such as having an alibi or witnesses, just by knowing the name of their accuser, or the circumstances of the alleged crime. Now that the presumption of innocence / burden of proof is out of the way, we can streamline the process to: You're accused of rape. Can you prove you did not? and then prison. . Seriously, the right to know one's accuser, and by extension, one's council's right to know the circums…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:44 AM
2

I should offer to put my body on the line for the family’s greater good. Except that, for men younger and more anglo than me at least, there's a very definite chance that my current family will not be my only, or last, family. Said risk being in a huge part out of my hands, as women are the primary initiators of divorce. Thus a basic unwillingness to cut off my chances to start anew. Women use reversible birth control. Where is the male equivalent? . Then again, my opinion remains that, when hea…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:34 AM
3

Tyranny of the minority. And there's just no way it can end badly, either.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:28 AM
3

Same experience here, although only as a consultant, so, short time periods, and an incentive to unbalance the (ever-shifting) power struggles to push my own agenda. Which is remarkably easy in female-dominated offices. Funny thing is, several women with varied job experiences have told me things were much easier in their previous jobs. With 50% or less females.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:27 AM
3

The things you can get young men to do for a whiff of pussy... Let's be clear: looking at a girl like she's your sister will not get you laid. Or <insert crass hillbilly joke>. On the other hand, if my sister ended up among strangers, half-naked and blind drunk, I'd spank her sorry arse. Because Mum would not be as merciful. . Remember this all of you: as the great american philosopher Wyatt Earp is rumoured to have said, nothing count so much as blood. The rest are just strangers..
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:21 AM
2

TL;DW: Rewards victims Feminism blames the patriarchy Feminism doesn't want equality This is not about women and feminism. The second point is simply an instance of blaming one's failures on a supposed oppressor class, the third is just supremacism. This is how the retarded left, so-called "social justice warriors", is destroying society, by annihilating merit and personal responsability. They don't even have an end game. A working society can't be 99% parasites. Or maybe their end game is 30% w…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:08 AM
6

The first victory that can be obtained with this documentary is exposing in real life the totalitarian leanings of feminist movements. . Of note, the author is female, and apparently a liberty activist. . Does the Spectator Australia have a big circulation?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:56 AM
2

SJWs, feminists included, derive their power from mob mentality, and are thus against the rule of law. Reaffirming due process can only be a good thing, especially when it hits the two main motivators (money and reputation). The suit further characterizes the St. Benedict student as being more of the sexual aggressor, noting that she did not request his consent for sexual acts she performed on him Glorious. Affirmative consent running both ways. Now it mostly depends on whether a judge is willin…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:47 AM
1

Or at the very least make censorship widely public, which is a secondary victory.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:38 AM
1

Can't say I'm impressed, East Germany didn't need college education to build the Stasi.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 09:52 PM
1

You can look for common HPV strains in a biopsy, leading to probable cause. HPV causes principaly genital (cervical) cancer in women, but mostly oropharyngeal cancer in men.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:04 PM
2

See Jane Go is the brainchild of Savannah Jordan, 18, of San Juan Capistrano. Her father, William Jordan, founded the company after she and her sister expressed interest in ride-hailing Am I stupid, or does this make it look like it's the father's "brainchild"?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:31 PM
6

I'm going to quote myself from another thread : males account for 40% of HPV-related cancers. CDC numbers. The article and myself quote numbers from the early '10s, Gardasil was approved in 2006, so these numbers are without vaccine. . Does your country's healthcare provide a HPV vaccine for boys and girls, or only girls?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 05:28 PM
1

Well, half-joking here. Men tend to do all the dangerous or punishing stuff that, if it doesn't kill you outright, leaves you severely damaged later in life. Can't locate it right now, but I seem to remember reading how the life expectancy gender gap was significantly reduced among the middle class, with access to white collar jobs and decent healtcare.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:29 PM
1

Just checked. Still absurdely high (5.4). Only funny takeaway was Hemsworth: which one of these makes me look more like a doctor – me playing the saxophone or me listening to the saxophone?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:21 PM
2

Probably. Being on the map is already half the battle.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:16 PM
7

Testosterone says, better to burn out than to fade away. Bigger, faster, stronger, can't expect to last as long. And well, dangerous pursuits, dangerous jobs, war, and the very little help afforded to men in trouble.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:15 PM
1

You still have music from before things got stupid. Springsteen's Tunnel of Love and Sting's Soul Cages (the LPs, not singles) are very personal, and have always sounded very male to me. Clearly not female-centric. Prince was a tad more macho, at least in his music. Stuff like Head or Darlin Nikki wasn't really well received by women. The late '60s - early '70s Stones were gloriously uncorrect. Hendrix was not exactly a feminist or pussy-whipped (cause if she don't love him no more, he knows her…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:12 PM
8

Titled: Why we should have the right to see feminist’s controversial pro-men film, ‘The Red Pill’ Implicitely positing she is oppressed, and deprived of the right to go see a movie. The victim narrative never relents. Well, everybody has a right to see this movie, but maybe not the opportunity, thanks to feminist illegal censorship. Which is sorta, kinda the point she makes. Except it's peppered with gems such as: Who can deny centuries of oppression and discrimination against women? Women are o…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 09:24 AM
3

$4M is the good news, although it will probably get reduced in appeal. Still, what a male privilege we enjoy when we can have long, serious-sounding words like "aggravated sexual assault" applied to us, where women just have the modest and simple "rape". /s. She fucking groomed and raped a bloke with cerebral palsy, but legally, it's assault. Goes to show law needs to change. . Stubblefield was representing herself in the civil case at the time of the judgment “I believed that he and I were inte…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:48 AM
5

I wouldn't go this far, as the definition of "misogyny" is often streched to include "not agreeing with a feminist", or "not actively doing feminists' work for them".
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:30 AM
3

The definition exists as a concept. Same as the Communist utopia. Suffragists were egalitarians, which the Suffragettes killed off because why bother with men and lower class women?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:28 AM
2

And I assume you're slapping arbitrary labels on people, or trying to dictate their opinions. Emma Watson school of social politics?
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:25 AM
9

The movie feminists don't want you to see! . Crass as it is, this kind of promotion seems to work, so, well...
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:17 AM
6

I'll be criticized for saying this, but it's probably as good a piece as can be expected from the mainstream media. It does go through the usual talking points (misogynist propaganda, Roosh V association, ...), but presents them as somebody's opinion, and not unarguable truths. On the other hand, it does present favorable opinions (again, as opinions): The film professes to take a “balanced approach” to the men’s rights movement “stop extremists censoring what Australians are allowed to see” why…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:01 AM
3

The words are different, but some of the ideas sound the same: “Feminism denies what we Muslims call fitrah, man’s innate disposition… not only is it not compatible with Islam on an ideological basis, it doesn’t even make sense according to biological or sociological fact.” . On the other hand, the (apparently Muslim) author's view on Western males is surprising. At least for me. From the headline: The manosphere’s Islamophobia won’t keep them from choosing ‘the red pill’ Although the author exp…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 07:44 AM
3

Men's participation in the US workforce is at an all-time low (Depression-level) at ... almost 89%. Whereas women's is slowly eroding, at a current 75%. (Both 25-54, figures for seniors are just frightening) That's more than twice as many women opting out of the workforce as men, but what the fuck are men doing? They are expected to carry their own weight. These alimonies ain't gonna pay themselves. Women, well, nobody really cares. . So, yeah, crisis, not really invisible anymore. Call it men g…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 11:10 PM
3

Bias response or biased response? But yeah, we need to educate college graduates to complain and litigate the hell out of each and every interaction in their daily lives. Encourage mob mentality. Nurture entitlement. These people were born at the wrong time, in the wrong place. They would have been so happy in the Soviet block.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:43 PM
1

I just recycled on old lawyer joke.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:39 PM
3

Because I have access to numbers mostly for the USA and the UK. Spain does look more fucked up than the US, actually, but I haven't found a public 'bureau of statistics' type site. Greece, well, we don't need numbers to know Greece is bad. Germany I'd be interested in, they're playing very complicated odds. France, they're just stupid, they should be a lot better off. Secondly because people tend to think of decline as a linear process. It's not. Especially when some other superpower is waiting …
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:38 PM
9

Men are not dropping from the top of the workforce. They're dropping for the bottom. Where exactly zero women are waiting to pick up the job.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:02 PM
6

Not all feminists. But yeah, men-hating feminists exist, and they do give the other 3% a bad name... . For the confused, this is sarcasm.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:00 PM
6

Policemen, firemen, garbage men, men manning the power station, and the list goes on. Actually, what they did prove is that life doesn't stop when women are away. Difficulties stemmed from nonsense like having the men organise a kiddie beauty pageant. . The Week the Women Went. I would have loved to see The Month the Men Moved. Well, its single episode, at least.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:50 PM
1

Oh, great. A Comedian. What's your position? Enjoy the decline?
/r/MensRights25/10/16 02:09 PM
4

Step aside ladies, looks like it's the guys turn to take control over safe sex. Just to be clear, contraception is not safe sex. Not safe from STDs, not safe from abuse claims. . Male contraception is overall not desired (except by men, but who cares for these) as it would: deprive women of social power. No more pregnancy scares, no more shotgun weddings. reduce birth rates. Like, big time. To wit, 'unintended' pregnancies accounted for 45% of pregnancies in the US in 2011. Not all unintended pr…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:34 PM
7

Men are retreating from the workforce, Forbes and the Wall Street Journal are getting their undies tied in a bunch over this. Men are also phasing off marriage and kids, because, you know, fear of commitment. And lifetime alimony, maybe. Women being 60% of graduates probably won't translate in women getting all the good jobs, because you only need so many Gender Studies Ph.Ds in the private sector, and also because women have earned (?) over 50% of university diplomas since the early '80s, and h…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:07 PM
9

This feminist victory against the oppressive patriarchy(tm, patent pending) needs more media coverage. Scandal is as good publicity as anything else, and seeing feminists score points against freedom of speech may get people thinking. Even get them to see the doc for themselves, maybe.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 11:54 AM
1

I go with "intelectually superior" specifically because it's antagonistic and unPC. Also, the quotes do support "better spatial awareness", but none of your "could haves". Not trying to start an argument here (did I mention I am an antagonist git?), but there's not necessarily a flaw to balance a perk. Nature is not concerned with fair. As for testosterone, it's a means to an end. Or several ends, as it stands, and I was just pointing out how ridiculous the "testosterone poisoning" cliché is. So…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 11:50 AM
1

Still, necessary heuristic, but not proof. I'm not down-playing induction in everyday life, or intuition in science. IA projects of the '90s (Doug Lenat comes to mind) have brilliantly demonstrated purely deductive machines' ability to produce massive quantities of true but useless results. . Edit: as another example: Fermat. Wiles.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 10:36 AM
5

Do you have ASS issues? Do you have anger issues? . I have not seen the documentary, so the one point you quote, on which you are able to base a judgment of my whole life of being (I'm tremendously impressed by the way) did not stand out for me. At this point, the article's author may be wrong. Or you may. I don't know. . I've just re-read the article, it looks very much like "he said, she said". To wit: The Change.org petition describes the Reddit community featured in the documentary as "the s…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 10:28 AM
8

Because toxic freedom of speech must be suppressed at all costs, as it leads to the even more toxic freedom of opinion. . The article itself is refreshingly factual. The movie theaters did not answer a call for comments. The petition was possibly just playing to the crowd, while backstage threatening them anyway. . I think there's a silent majority of men terminally fed up with our current society, and SJWs are trying at all costs to prevent them from building an identity.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 09:18 AM
2

Nice study. Feminists will claim "testosterone poisoning", in the same breath as "women are not breeders", while ignoring that sisters of male twins happen to apparently be physically and intelectually superior to the average woman. As for the differences between sexes: biology doesn't care for gender theory.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:55 AM
6

I think it will be more of a case of breaking the camel's back. Feminism has successfully sparked a sex war anew. Women don't see it yet, because feminist PR does raise some valid issues. For women far away which they don't intend to help, but valid issues nonetheless. And when most women vaguely feel there's a problem, they blame men. Where have all the good men gone? . Men on the other hand have grown frankly disenchanted, but don't dare give voice to this feeling, because social shaming and c…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:07 AM
5

CSU-Fullerton asked students to suggest what words and phrases “you want people to eliminate” On what authority? Your basic exercise in tyranny.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 10:31 PM
21

Jonathan Swift's Modest Proposal was obviously satirical. This one, not so much: restrict freedom of opinion to approved opinions (men don't vote for my candidate, let them not vote) two wrongs make an obvious right (denying men the vote remedies "a historical unbalance") handwaving (men "believe themselves victims of discrimination) wage gap Yep, this one is feminist propaganda. No satire, no thought. Just plain "let's abolish democracy".
/r/MensRights24/10/16 10:26 PM
17

This is true in any given Western country. Women receive more government hand-outs than men. The Left promises more hand-outs. No surprise. Also, women over 45 tend to vote more to the right.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:21 PM
1

Thanks for taking the time. The feminist-clergy alliance does make a lot of sense, as both are intrinsincely conformist and moralizing. It seems then we are condemned to cyclic strife, then, as a society without male values will die or be conquered. Our social Ragnarok, in a way.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:43 PM
1

Have quotable, credible sources on hand, such as CDC reports. These can go a long way to provoke thought.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:33 PM
2

Let me start by saying that men in Britain have problems These are real issues we must address as a society OK, so men have problems, we all must do something as a society, but we don't. So let's all blame MRAs for not doing society's job for it. Men are not under attack [...] but many still feel under threat. Sure. Gaslighting. . Ultimately, it doesn't matter whether men are under attack, or just feel under attack (and all these statistics are just decades-long flukes). Cis-het white shitelords…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:31 PM
1

I'd like to see an argument to this, especially in the context of seemingly male-dominated countries. Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights24/10/16 02:36 PM
1

What you describe is intuition. Necessary in scienc,e but nothing to build upon. In your example, I can still refute their hypothesis with 100% accuracy if they provide no proof, and not have to provide "proof that they're wrong". Now if I want to make my own postulate, the same burden falls on me. . Doesn't mean I don't act on reasonnable suspicion IRL, just that it is bad form.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:27 PM
1

It all comes down to the burden of proof.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 12:12 PM
1

Facism can't afford diverging opinions.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:51 AM
10

Because premeditated, aggravated assault on men is just so hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:50 AM
1

I see your point, but I'd prefer honestly biased reviews, which will stimulate critical thinking from a part of the population, to this middle-of-the-road, go-back-to-sleep drivel. The longer it's pushed to one side, the harder the pendulum swings back, and I don't want to live in a real patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:04 AM
5

I too would welcome meritocracy. But when I hear "feminist", I fear "no future".
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:56 AM
2

“We’re going to have 31 different classes of pronouns? No, we’re not. It’s just not possible. People can’t do that. Our language doesn’t allow for that; we can’t remember that; what if we make a mistake?” I think the author misses the point: I will not use their moronic PC pronouns because I fucking don't want to. A small minority is claiming mandate as the language police. I refuse. If they can't accept this, let them go their own way and fend off for themselves. Far, far away from the schools,…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:54 AM
1

Very good read. I'll just add a pragmatic argument, but in my opinion the reason the subject is discussed: our societies were built on the work on man. Emasculating men is biting the hand that feeds. The freeloader need men grinding away. . Still, very good quote: The language of the totalist environment is characterized by the thought-terminating cliché.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:48 AM
11

I was an enthusiastic student of gender studies at university. I lapped up feminist, post-structuralist, and Marxist gender theory because it was radical and fascinating, and it suddenly opened up almost limitless possibilities Which explains how the author implicitely posits that domestic violence is a purely male-on-female occurence. But we all need to stand together against it, and men — even those hegemonic Aussie males — need to be a critical part of the solution. The radical idea that men …
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:43 AM
4

I'd say that the "balance of opinions" the author tries to reach is not a a good thing. Actually, it reeks of argument to moderation: you say the sky is blue, I say it is bright yellow, the truth thus surely is that the sky is green. Women around the world sure have real issues. Feminists are not all women. And especially not these women with real issues. The reviewer does point out how most MRA meetings are peaceful, until men-hating feminists turn it into a violent media circus. . Still, the r…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:32 AM
1

I don't understand why you've been downvoted. I think the war on men will stop, one way or the other. When a war stops, you see casualties for decades afterwards.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 07:18 AM
19

Considering what the bird is supposed to stand for, she should have ripped her nail off first. Without anaesthesia.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 08:29 PM
14

the dots symbolize that nothing is 100% yin or yang What I meant by incomplete. A principle is at its strongest only when including the other. This absence is the reason feminism is so destructive.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 06:51 PM
48

About as relevant as Hitler coopting the swastika. Their taijitu is incomplete, and yang is associated with white / sun / masculinity and so on. The feminine yin is dark.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 06:10 PM
20

Parents will rationalize too. Because it's easier than admitting to mutilating your own child.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:23 PM
49

Sane reaction, but this is only one failed attempt. There will be others, as long as there are no consequences for proponents of kindergarten indoctrination. Politically speaking, heads need to roll. And names need be circulated.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:41 PM
1

I'll assume your mother is a woman. She is a second-hand source when it comes to men. . Idiotic argument I lifted from feminists, because feminist logic is either incomplete or paradoxal.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:05 PM
1

Not considering the political aspect, it's important for these examples to get some coverage. Listen & believe at odds with hear & verify.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:00 PM
1

My contention is that the hostile environment is already created.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 11:08 AM
7

It seems paddling is still legal in Tennessee. I'd be really interested in the school's explanation as to how this is not sexual discrimination. And also the gender of these boys' teacher. . Does Title IX apply to high-schools? I guess it depends whether they receive federal money. Because being segregated into a boys-only room to be made to write a threat of physical violence against oneself does sound like grounds for a complaint.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:39 PM
3

She opposes the use on boys only, not corporal punishment itself.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:32 PM
21

Lives, female lives, are being put in major peril Actually, her radar officer was half a second away from dying, and the deck personnel were not exactly safe either. The Armed Forces don't like screw-ups because it's rarely one person's life alone at stake.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:25 PM
281

Sad as is it, this is the expected result when lowering the bar for political reasons. Aerodynamics don't care about your diversity. Bullets don't care about your empowerement. Physics is oppressive that way. . Edit: typo.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:22 PM
0

It's called universal suffrage. Not all is learned in college.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 08:33 PM
2

Sorry, I'm not sure I get your point.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:06 PM
8

From her own bio: A card-carrying member of the Illuminaughty, Mercedes joins the adult industry with a background in mainstream modeling and acting as well as education and work experience in engineering. She was scouted to one of the most prestigious fashion modeling agencies, earned her SAG/AFTRA membership as a teenager, and worked consistently for large commercial print magazines, catalogs and commercials. After returning to university and majoring in manufacturing engineering with an empha…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:50 PM
2

I won't criticise the science behind it, as I haven't read the study paper, just a journalist's second-hand account. Said account does seem to push a problematic narrative to me, namely intellectual domination of men by women. Couples are happier when the woman has more education? Should men restrain from pursuing Ph.Ds so they can find a better-educated mate? Should we reserve white-collar jobs for women, and blue-collar for men? (Hey, this one's actually half true already). And for all this, t…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 03:14 PM
4

That's the gist of the feminist conundrum for the average female. Today's women, raised to try and emasculate away, bemoan the absence of the trad-con man, ie: providing father figure / virile lover. They gleefully make the beds they don't want to lie in.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 03:04 PM
5

I doubt she has as much substance there. Probably missed a pun here.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:59 PM
25

(Smashing user name) The new face of MRM. With humongous boobs. Not even being sarcastic. She sounds like she wasn't blessed with a college education, and thus wasn't insulated from the real world. Denounces strong, independent womynz damselling to white, cis-het UN about mean tweets, demanding censorship and ignoring real problems in shitty countries. Denounces biting the hand the feeds, the hypocrisy of the progressive left and the rise of thought-police totalitarism. . I like her. Heck, I wou…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:17 PM
13

For the measly price of US$16m (I guess it's per year), Australia is purchasing a full generation of self-loathing, mentally imbalanced boys. No way this goes wrong.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:04 PM
11

Last-ditch attempt to re-ignite the sex wars in a bid to rally women to Clinton. Because she's a woman, it's important. Even claiming a gender empathy gap against women. Takes stones. But no facts to backup it up. Cause they don't exist. Non-existant facts are oppressive. My fave: And men who fear they’re losing control have fueled the rise of Donald Trump. Men who fear they are losing control obviously have failed to fully comprehend the situation. Or they're still living in the '50s. But women…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:27 PM
13

Nah, these people will always find someone to blame anyway. Don't forget, glaciers are sexist. Don't try to be exemplary, you can't be good enough for a feminist, you're just manipulated through shame.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:10 PM
13

there is a "marriage strike" underway I think it's far more serious than this. A strike is a concerted effort to withhold production in order to obtain some form of compensation/change/whatever. Men dropping out of marriage is an individual decision, only widespread. They're not saying they'll marry under given conditions. They just don't want to marry.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:48 PM
1

Still not defending your original postulate that I have restated many times. Still boring.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:40 PM
1

Not even. I am convinced Mad Max is a grossly under-rated social commentary, mostly for being appropriated by asinine, vociferous feminists. Then again, I think Saturday Night Fever is a grossly under-rated social commentary. Just look at the ending: it may be a shoot-out at the lonely cowboy, but it's definitely Max Going His Own Way. And don't get me started about the 'human rifle bipod' scene. It's so much subtler than the "you go, girl" cunts have read into it.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 12:38 PM
8

Archive. Sounds like mild advice out of the Red Pill. Then again, there's a reason it's a cliche. Trouble is, women don't want to marry young, and men now don't want to marry.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:30 AM
2

Funny, if ham-fisted. At the time, the equal pay act was 10 years old. The wage gap still had some (some) substance to it. Now we're the current year, and it's touted by villains.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:24 AM
1

There must be, considering each and every single female flaw is men's fault. /s Or maybe "extremist" is a good thing, in which case men have nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:20 AM
2

You are very right, although the correlation is intriguing. It's just American newspapers getting their undies in a bunch since male participation in the workforce has dipped below 90%. Because everyone one knows what our society was really built upon, and we're going Japan-style.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:14 AM
4

And the author forgets that when absolutely everyone around her needs a vocabulary lesson, maybe she should open a dictionary...
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:01 AM
2

On casual watch, I thought I was reading far too much in the movie. On second watch, I gained respect for George Miller. And Tom Hardy. They have made Max into a decently subtle character, even though his most interesting communication is non verbal
/r/MensRights14/10/16 08:57 AM
2

Common cause. The article postulates that a significant fraction of Americans (roughly, 6%) are in chronic, debilitating pain, leading them to: take prescription painkillers drop out of the work force The author says the effect is less visible for women, because they have flooded the workplace over the last half-century. I rather think women's participation topped out at 77% at the end of the 20th century, so a few points less just did not show. Whereas men used to be >96%, making the hit clearl…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:43 PM
10

Good. Now more people know this movie exists. The article is classic handwaving (Oh, yes, men have problem, but no fuck given) and calls to unity, Borg-style. One sentence stands out: and a cathartic viewing of “Mad Max: Fury Road” Good movie. I really liked how the female utopia was empty and barren because not a single woman had bothered showing up after the few founders. Not even sarcastic here, Miller cleverly illustrates how yang alone burns itself out in time, but yin alone is barren and s…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:10 PM
12

It's new. Give it a year, and watch the drama. At these concentrations, oestrogen poisoning is unforgiving.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:59 PM
1

Fair point.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:54 PM
16

Because she is "clever & ambitious". She dumped it all on her brother, and is pictured as "only a go-between". Or maybe she really only was a go-between. We'll probably never know, but in cases such as this, the leader is, surprinsingly, never the smart one and always the dunce. Go figure.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:31 PM
12

there was no record of anyone actually complaining about the syllabus. The university had apparently launched this investigation on its own. Some bitter cunt at the Title IX office has decided to take over the univeristy. "all constitutionally protected speech is welcome." But the director eventually conceded this was fine. Wow. The director eventually bowed down to the bloody Constitution. Is he aware the Constitution is not optional. It's like, law, even. Kid you not. triangles. Seidemann has …
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:23 PM
6

I don't see things this way, but I grew up before the madness really began. I'm afraid you are quite right. Self-loathing usually leads to passivity and violence, each in turn. I really don't like where we're going.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:15 PM
2

Men are always red balls for the feminist PreCrime.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:31 PM
3

Please explain.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:17 PM
10

Too soon!
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:02 PM
15

This article is 2-year old, I'm sure she has found her prince now. /s The legal root of the problem has already been commented upon there and then, and her article makes clear that her interest in men's point of view is fleeting at best. . I think it is gainful for young men to where they stand, it the point of my post. What's the point of yours?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:00 PM
16

The author hasn't really moved past the "woe is me" stage either. As for consent laws, they are relevant to your (potential) kids. It's hard to be really unaffected by these laws.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:46 PM
1

How is this related to men's rights? How is it related to Islam? I think the song is a French piece from the cabaret period. Or at least the music.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:29 PM
1

Most historians consider Kramer’s work [the Malleus Maleficarum] as a misogynistic text that had no real substance to it. No shite! Actually, my Latin is rusty, but it seems targeted at women specifically. A book to smash ungendered evil magic-users should be Malleus Maleficorum, I think. . By feminist logic, isn't men's long-documented fear that women could steal their penises proof that we live in a dick-napping culture?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:25 PM
13

I'd agree with you ... except she utterly self-centered, totally dismissive of men's motives, and insultingly patronizing in her description of men ("reminding him to use a napkin at the restaurant", seriously, this is a the post-worthy highlight of her dating life?). So, right, but entitled.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:12 PM
127

"Where have all the good men gone?" - dating edition. Men are not acting the traditional directive male role in dating anymore, and the author blames feminism. She is a victim! She had done nothing wrong! Well, wrong. She has done nothing, making her the tacit accomplice of the feminist reengineering of men. She reaps what she let sow, and it ain't manly. . I’m just saying, take a risk! Except this is not a social risk anymore. This is a legal risk. The emasculation of man has been signed into l…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:05 PM
3

Agreed, this is not the place. The justice system has never felt so fragile in my lifetime, and it's scary. It's hard to shake the feeling we're living the last of the good years.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:14 AM
2

I am not trying to bar anybody from running for office. Trump should withdraw Doesn't withdrawing bar him from running? . This is another discussion, but the main argument against universal suffrage has historically been that it could allow for a dictature by the majority. The proportion of tax-payers in Western countries is hovering around 50%, less in some, and will shrink dramatically in the coming decades, due to automation. Universal suffrage will, one way or the other, be brought into ques…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:56 AM
5

This is where we differ. You advocate listen and believe. I say innocent until proven guilty. I'm trad-con that way. My way of thinking may be quaint, but it has served us well for centuries. Yours is higly economical: torches and pitchworks are cheaper than judges and investigators.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:43 AM
1

Again, you attempt a tangent & strawman. Not a single argument in your post. You postulated men are uniquely and exclusively attracted to health indicator. Now prove it. You wrote "theory of evolution set down by Darwin". He did no such thing. That Darwin's postulated natural selection mechanism has been used in evolutionary theory does not allow attribution of all later work to him. You wave around "evolutionary psychology" or such, as though any valid theory was deterministically prescriptive …
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:39 AM
5

My example is murder. It usually entails victims. Being accused thankfully does not deprive one from one's right to due process. Confessions are low-value evidence, except under authoritarian regimes. Maybe you also want to do away with the 5th? You're advocating mob mentality. This is the opposite of justice.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:30 AM
2

Universal suffrage is far younger than modern democracy. On the other hand, trying to last-moment bar a criteria-meeting candidate from an election outside of any form of due process sounds dangerously totalitarian. Voltairian position, political freedom means protecting those you don't agree with.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 10:23 AM
3

Rape does culture exist, we keep talking about it. It's a vast over-inflation of the prevalence of rapes, the denial of female perpertrators, and constant fear-mongering. And it's peddled by feminists.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 07:29 AM
2

"Rights" period trump "men's rights" (pun unintended). Admission has little value as a proof. If you admit to a murder, the cops will ask you for material evidence (ie: where did you bury the bodies, can you produce the murder weapon), else the prosecution is shaky at best. The Trump thing sounds like cretinous bragging, it can only hold in a court of public opinion.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 07:19 AM
-4

Or we'll end up under a literal patriarchy. Somehow, I don't picture the princes from the Persian Gulf being ousted from power by allegations of inappropriate touching. The left is happily hacking away at the pillars of democracy, forgetting that a totalitarian regime might not be theirs.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 07:12 AM
7

Typical feminist cooptation of third world misery to serve first world, fat white arses. Girls in Africa are exploited, and thus boys in the US and Europe should be punished. Because gender pay gap. Western feminists are so entitled that even Africa is all about them.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 07:05 AM
19

It's a good thing that judges insert commentaries like this in their statements, calling out double-standards when they see them. In effect, he's saying "pussy pass denied".
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:36 PM
1

Archive. Pushes the myth of the "pink tax". Pushes the myth of "reverse sexism". Men also are targets of sexism. Whites also are targets of racism.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:52 PM
2

Avg. 2015 base salary for men: $106,665 Avg. 2015 base salary for women: $106,671 They'll just say male privilege is in bonuses, not base salary. Feminists are not arguing to discover the truth. They're arguing to scam money. They have no reason to listen to reason.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:03 PM
1

Oh. You're an American. I guess this election cycle is funny only from a distance...
/r/MensRights12/10/16 08:45 AM
1

Lack of hardship. Lack of exposure to the real world. College used to mean something as an educational setting, but socially, it has always been plutocratic. It's mainly an echo chamber for the upper 10-12% (the actual 'middle class') to rehash their first world problems, totally ignorant of how the other 90% live. Problem is, this middle class provides most opinion leaders, except maybe for R&B 'singers'. These people make the brunt of our judicial system, our legal system, and so on. . I obvio…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 08:38 AM
2

I meant, can the prosecution offer a plea deal against the victim's wishes?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 10:52 PM
1

Optional archive for those who don't wish to give the Daily Mail traffic. I used it to read the article, so might as well post the link.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:30 PM
9

They usually wait till after the wedding to try and rip your balls off. I guess foreskin is foreplay.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:28 PM
5

They want to make an example of themselves. They need to be made an example of.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:26 PM
14

The gap is real in sentencing. Not familiar enough with the US judicial system, but isn't the victim (in this case, his parents) supposed to have a say in the proposal of a plea deal?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:23 PM
2

Archive.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:20 PM
4

Actually, "good men" seems to have become a female code word for their unrealistically high and morally ungrounded expectation. Some mythical creature against which to judge and demean real men. If chick flicks are any indication, has the uncanny ability, nay, superpower, to provide, as required and at the exact needed moment, as defined by a woman's mysterious inner workings, vigorous sex, unlimited material ressources, and "emotional companionship". And also to take interest in a woman by virt…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:13 PM
4

It's Worse to Be a Girl in U.S. Than Kazakhstan The author has obviously never lived in Kazakhstan. . But yeah, young girls should be taught early to spew insane complaints. That level of stupidity can only be reached through rigorous training.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:52 PM
2

Which will be great fun. Having no respect for oneself usually leads to peaceful and loving relationships to others. Progressive Left: bringing you today the criminals of tomorrow!
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:47 PM
6

What about the 40 to 60% of male violence perpetrated by females?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:45 PM
1

It's in Algeria. He may not have seen her much before the wedding. Maybe not even in person.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:43 PM
5

but my fiancé there would have made it 2v2 (although we would have still been at a disadvantage, them still having a knife and size advantage) This woman has no understanding of violence outside TV. what would have happened if him leaving me had given them the courage to do something worse? I mean, I don't think they would have So did her fiancé, probably. He accuses me of wanting to use him as a meatshield just because he’s a man, and that what he did was smart and not the machismo stupidity I …
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:36 PM
1

It seems like you're a very poor socialist if you accept the idea of the job market setting wages. In Europe, we call the mainstream left socialism. Not much to do with Socialism anymore.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:05 PM
2

In '80s music, you knew you were there when you had Weird Al Yankovic parody one of your songs. I guess being on South Park means the MRM truly exists. Plus it's pretty funny.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:56 PM
5

That is a rough result for a man who will a substantial portion of the damages for his abusive treatment and long confinement. She's even stolen words from this sentence! The American male really needs to come to terms with his status as a meal ticket. You know, man up, be better and stuff. . On a less sarcastic note, the woman gets money because she sacrificed her career so that her husband could further his onw career as an inmate, right? What's the logic?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:52 PM
8

It's leading to white males becoming 2nd class citizens, the goal of feminists. Feminism is a supremacist movement, which is morally unacceptable. The other big issue is that it aims to destroy the pillar of Western civilization, namely male achievement, without proposing any viable alternative. Feminism is a short-term money grab. It has no endgame, and will leave our world in shambles for the benefit of a very few.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:42 PM
-6

Isn't that Obama guy on his way out quite soonish with not a chance to see it through? Does he even have the power to "sign it into law"? Sounds awfully like that tired '80s joke of adding 'not' at the end of the sentence. Like: "Men, we care about you. Not."
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:16 PM
1

It's curious that left out 'Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex' by Darwin which is the one I was discussing. Still not a "theory of evolution" by Darwin. Your words, your burden of proof. arent the sort of guy who reads walls of text (and i was right) Meritless walls of text. And I'm admittedly more into walls of numbers. did you say something about straw-man? Nope. Had I to, I'd say "argument to authority". Except the Daily Mail is not even peer-reviewed (even if the process is fa…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 09:00 PM
1

He more looks like he's flinging anything but the kitchen sink at the canvas, and sees what sticks. Still, he must be doing something right. Maybe it just goes over my head. I'm not fast enough. It irritates me to no end that people clamour "Trump is evil" (I have my own version of Trump where I live), but never wonder why so many people consider him the lesser of two evil. Leftist dogmatic moral high ground. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:09 PM
2

I'd really like to still be a man, even in name. Just have equal rights! Oh noes! This makes me a Harry Potter Feminist! They're infantile and don't exist.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:05 PM
1

I'm not so sure. Just look at Trump.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 05:43 PM
3

This conclusion is fully avoidable, as it is backed only by an army of strawmen. Are you advocating a fully segregated society?
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:28 PM
1

The UK is sort of not Europe anymore. It's complicated. But I'll concede Sweden or Spain are far down the slope too.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:12 PM
3

Positive review, but the bloe identifies as an anti-feminist. I'd gladly trade glowing reviews on small news sites for a massive bashing on CNN. There's no such thing as bad publicity.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:06 PM
1

The victims are the men But nobody cares. Which is another debate, but a sad truth. Society only cares about men when the wheel stops grinding. Which is now. . Increase penalties Institute penalties first. . If women become afraid to report rape The justice system is not (supposed to be) this binary. There's such a thing as not enough evidence to convict, but enough to not prosecute for false accusation. False positives and false negatives are inevitable, but the current system produces only pos…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:57 PM
3

Is it OK if it's a motorcycle? I'm just a man, I need precise instructions. . This warning makes "do not dry pet in microwave" look less stupid. And pushes the notion that men are beasts. Thankfully Spain has basically stopped reproducing, we can hope the infection dies with them.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:55 PM
1

Men, being people, should definitely care is some (significant) portion of the victims of a quite frankly odious type of violence (I'm talking real rape, not an unwanted greeting) are afraid to report it. But men, being the primary victims, and women, being people with a stake in society, should also definitely care that a sizable portion of women have neither qualms nor fear to falsely report rapes. This hurts real victims, as people grow inured to rape claims, and also hurts women as a whole (…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:32 PM
1

Didn't read wall of text, because strawman, so no merit. You propose an absolute truth, I provide one (1) counter-example, thus denying you the 'absolute' part. . it's part of the theory of evolution set down by Darwin Charles Darwin did no such thing. He published On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, his theory usually being referred to as 'natural selection', except by creationists and imbeciles (the former bein…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:19 PM
3

So you did, indeed. It's only the continuation of the left's attempt to reverse the burden of proof (guilty until proven otherwise), which is your go-to totalitarian tool. Then again, as I wrote above, not being an American puts me on the fence on this. America becoming a cautionary tale may avert the disaster for Europe. Not for america, obviously, but as the Trump-supporting centipedes/frogs/navigators/changes too fast to follow are keen on saying, there doesn't seem to be brakes on this train…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:08 PM
0

You're entitled to your opinion, but not to me giving a fuck. Also, fun-with-facts time: my affirmation is still true. His account is new, and his first message is to call me a moron. See how your feelz do not have an impact on this?
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:03 PM
1

Most people will evaluate such a situation intuitively, not legally. Mostly because they're outside bars, not in a courtroom. Personnally, I would push her quite roughly, but only because someone suddenly invading my perimeter is a threat. Then only push her further if needed because she's fugly and inappropriate. Tested several times with hen parties (drunk soon-to-be brides tend to pull this kind of stunt nowadays), I never thought about the situation legally.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:00 PM
2

Do you have examples of non-radical 3rd, and now 4th wave? My mother was 2nd wave, and, looking back, I have this nagging suspicion she already was just a useful idiot. And to be honest, she never went on TV, never wrote a book, and doesn't have a Youtube channel. She prescribes no opinion but her own. For purposes of this discussion, she does not exist.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 01:52 PM
8

by holding employers responsible for proving that pay differences between men and women are based on a qualification that’s a business necessity and not gender. Cue American economy bogged down by endless litigation, employers cowed into giving raises to females just to pacify them, and a male brain drain. Then again, I'm not an American, so I probably stand to profit from Clinton's policies...
/r/MensRights10/10/16 12:03 AM
4

Hey, I'd like to have rights like a woman too! Except, I'm kinda used to having a dick.... Of the women surveyed, 87% said they would stick with their husbands. Contrast with the rising divorce rate in the UK over the same period. What they say, what they do.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:56 PM
5

Apparently, nobody cares about men's opinion. Except men, obviously, but nobody cares about their opinion.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:52 PM
2

Sounds awfully like the Judgment of Solomon.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:36 PM
1

Attractiveness and health are strongly related Proof. It's adorable You haven't earned condescension. [long rehashing] Repeating baseless affirmations makes you tedious, not right. Define 'best'. Provide facts. Use reason.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:22 PM
21

Science is factual and teaches critical thinking. Feminism is sollipsistic and cult-like. Of course they want science watered down.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:28 PM
3

Do archive this tripe. . straight white men (aka winners of the privilege jackpot) Someone graft her a dick, so she knows what she's talking about. And a brain, same purpose. What’s more efficient, marrying someone and using their privilege, or waiting 30 years for intersectional feminism to work? This is also why women tend to marry older men; young women can rise in the world more quickly if they marry someone who has already done it. She is fucking red pill, she just doesn't know it. So yeah,…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:27 PM
2

Define 'best'. Often it meant 'here and willing'. . Also, your original argument is that men are attracted to healthy women. My counter-argument is that it depends on goals, and some men will pursue women based on looks and not health or fitness for reproducive purposes. I fail to see how your answers adresses your point or mine in any way.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:20 PM
4

Western girls (supposedly) have bigger boobs, are promiscuous sluts, and don't have to be respected (Japanese have a rather haughty view of foreigners). So yeah, attractive in a way. But as a whole, I don't think Asian men are much into the small breast / big ass / thick thighs trip. Not really their idol bands.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:48 PM
1

Japanese are not too big on public displays of affection. Or sexuality in this case. Also, these are explanation as to why this kind of stunt is not really relevant to male/female relationships. You know, explanation =/= excuse. Scratch that, you probaly don't know. And lastly, fuck you. Brand new account to call someone a moron. Whatever you mean exactly by cuck, you probably fit. PS: I guess the red pill requires a tad more brainpower than you currently demonstrate.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:26 PM
1

No really relevant, I'd say. This doesn't looked like a phone movie, so there's at least another visible participant with visible filming gear, which could also explain these men's reaction. Also, Japanese men seeing a pudgy white woman in athis kind of dress probably all thing drunk American slut, giving her a "foreigner are so stupid" pass. They look like young men looking for fun, she didn't try it on no-nonsense-driking salarymen either. And lastly, there's less of a perceived element of thr…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:26 PM
3

She's neither fit nor attractive.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:24 PM
3

They don't acknowledge female-on-male. This law still is utterly gynocentric. This said, India has a population problem, so not much incentive to make marriage an attractive proposition.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:12 PM
1

The author basically denounces that "women's lib" was touted as an auto-win button for any argument, and that liberals had no balls. So, still relevant half a century later. Interesting point in the end: the 'new' feminists, now current's year harpies, being supremacists, they should be given land to found their own nation. If only it was so easy...
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:10 PM
5

Archive. Hasn't Springsteen been writing about depression and / or male unease since the mid-80s? Born In The USA? Tunnel Of Love? . Men's life of quiet desperation have been written about for decades to centuries. The only difference in the current year is that the media are willing to acknowledge it, probably because the decreased riches output is proving inconvenient.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 05:04 PM
2

Full disclosure: I'm as college-educated as they come. Grew up in a crap neighbourhood, served a little. I'd say that college is not the root of the problem :)
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:47 PM
3

They are not that good. They are still wondering where all the good men have gone.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:43 PM
5

Why? It's the closest thing to Circus Games since the fall of Rome. If only there wasn't so much at stake...
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:17 PM
3

I'll disagree with you using very plain langage: my fucking preferences were not my marrying preferences. At some point in my life, I was going for looks alone, because "quality time" meant sex, and the rest was spent on work. And I have screwed cunts I wouldn't let near a child, especially my own. . Sadly, people don't know when to stop. Women these days expect to "sow their wild oats" (do you young people not say "ride the cock carousel" now?) and not be called a slut when they discover their …
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:15 PM
3

This actually depends on said wallet's proximity to a female.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:06 PM
7

She did it. Yes, there are misogynistic members of this movement, but Jaye reveals that the movement’s core issues are valid and deserve much more attention. What? A commenter somehow able to move past the ad hominem. Probably because the director is a woman. . I am passionate about women’s rights, and bemoan the many ways men mistreat and discriminate against the female gender—a worldwide phenomenon which seems registered in us males' genes. The self-loathing is strong in this one. Also, fun fa…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:04 PM
6

Sounds about right. Except for one little detail: law enforcement is male. "Male allies" are fops. Who will enforce their totalitarian femtopia? . Feminism has no endgame. It's all about ripping as much as you can stuff in your mouth, and run like hell when the shite hits the fan. "Enjoy the decline", indeed.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:59 PM
34

This is absolutely outstanding. Congratulations for what you and your ex are building, and my best wishes for the future, for the three of you, even though separated. Never forget: children are raised by example. Be the person you want them to be. . The only sad thing here, is that you had to go outside the system to create a satisfactory solution. This is wrong in so many ways.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:53 PM
0

As a rule, men don't nag, that's a woman's thing. They pout. So either women's voices will rise against this issue (the upcoming The Red Pill documentary was shot by a woman, after all), and maybe the problem will be fixed in time, or people will eventually notice men's increasing absence from their traditional role. Which will be too late. Good luck shaming back into the grind all these future young men that will not be be born.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:46 PM
1

Well then, said the scorpion to the frog, it's my nature to sting... . Seriously, he may have no paycheck now, but he's bound to have a few millions for her in the bank somewhere. If he's any clever, that somewhere is far, far away.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:40 PM
2

Japan's GenX is Europe's GenY, and probably the US's too.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:39 PM
2

No deals with terrorists.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:59 AM
1

Obvious troll, but then again, Pankhurst, the original Marxist sufragette, did all of her 'activism' from the safety of her husband's money.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:53 AM
2

For the most part, it's manufactured outrage for political purposes. I think it's also women's insidious fear that male / female relations become too explicit. More precisely, that they become explicitely transactional, eschewing the illusion of romance, and losing women the upper hand.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:48 AM
3

You don't say? Is this the reason it's been a cliché for centuries? . Corollary: looks fade much faster than wallets.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:41 AM
6

The real lesson will probably be that she will walk away with his money, so no, no real reason to stop.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:37 AM
0

To be fair, feminism has long decided that gays had outlived their role of useful idiots, and turned the GLBT into LGBT, which will obviously soon drop the 'G' altogether.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:35 AM
1

I did not get that reference. Christ I'm old.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:33 AM
15

Obama's call for men to "be better" does beg one question, though. What for? What can American men look forward to by being better drones for the system? . In a way, Japanese GenXers were asked this question in the '90s. They failed to find an answer. Now they're failing to survive as a country. . Feminists are moderatly good at pointing out the problems they've caused. They seem absolutely unable to propose any solution other than "someone find a solution for me, now!".
/r/MensRights09/10/16 11:06 AM
2

Single-step instructions: have a father in the home. This has worked for us as a species for at least the few last millenia. Feminism is claiming to 'fix' something that ain't broke. . Funny thing, is, I remember a country with a massive surge of fatherless children, raised by welfare-sponsored single mothers. It was Ceaușescu' Romania. See how well this turned out.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 10:59 AM
3

On the one hand, I agree with you that this specific occurence stems from women's entitlement to "slap men around", whenever and however they see fit. On the other, the main cause here is the widespread, utter disregard for men's well-being and even survival, at its finest. Call it male disposability or internalized misandry, but it's real.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 10:53 AM
2

Probably not much. The inquest will conclude that there was no fault from judicial / carceral system, and all this will be hand-waved as being the dead man's fault. . The State Crime Laboratory’s Medical Examiner Division found that Sabbie died of “hypertensive arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease,” and claimed that the altercation “played a minimal role in the decedent’s death, and may not have contributed at all to his death.”
/r/MensRights09/10/16 10:49 AM
10

Archive. Please do not feed the Huffington Post. . This man was killed by brain-dead, power-tripping rent-a-cops and an insane judicial system. His wife acted like a cunt, basically low-level SWATing him, but I seriously doubt she expected things to turn out this way. On the average, I doubt women are trying to get their partners killed: dead men don't pay alimony.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 10:23 PM
3

Looking at the first picture in your linked article, I fail to understand how this woman can get ahead. Also: men do this too, although probably less often and less obviously. . To address your main point, yin is the female / negative / passive / covert / treacherous principle of the universe. So, this observation is at the very least older than the Bible. Doesn't mean it shouldn't exist, as every river must have a north and a south bank. But left unchecked as it is in the current year, it's dis…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:42 PM
1

To be more precise: research on New Zealand's taxe structure produces a few noteworthy observations: women on the average are net tax contributors (with a grain of salt) for a short perio dof their later life (45 to 60), whereas men are from 22 to 65 women on the average have a lifelong fiscal impact of -$150,000 (it's still over 100k in USD) what few men live to 80+ have a lifelong fiscal impact of 0 men dying at 65 leave on the average +50k positive balance; women are never positive, whatever …
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:32 PM
3

Ryan, Trudeau: proof that generation X has lost any concept of merit (reverence is earned, no due), along with its balls it seems. Full disclosure: GenXer myself.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:06 PM
3

How long before his proposals are called sexist, as most employees of the education system are females?
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:58 PM
6

Justice should be tempered with mercy. But first there should be justice. That means no lynching mobs, but no free pass either. . Also, no sympathy. There's a fucking line in the sand there, and no way she didn't know she was crossing it.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:57 PM
14

Social control. People busy fighting their very nature, and for no good reason, are total pushovers. . One key to Trump's rise? He's unabashed and unashamed. He never got the memo about toxicity.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 06:01 PM
4

in science education we have ignored the knowledge generated by feminist researchers about how females engage and participate in science. Further, science education has often failed to consider the implications from feminist critiques of science on science education. Yet another cult attacks the scientific method because it teaches critical thinking. Life in the West is so easy that people can and do live in a bubble of their thoughts, insulated from reality.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 11:58 AM
4

The "I don't understand people who..." argument does not prove said people are inconsistant. Most of the times, it only demonstrates your own stupidity.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:41 AM
2

Women have been 'liberated' from traditional gender roles. Men have not. they only had extra duties tacked onto the previous ones. Feminists intend to keep it that way (or worse if possible).
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:40 AM
1

Same as any war: the first few female deaths will be tragedies. The next thousands will be statistics. The way it is for men, really. You get used to anything.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:31 AM
1

Morale doesn't affect the dead. Women are on the average crap soldiers, and outstripped by POGs. Mixed units will die faster. All-female units have not been tested. Source: the USMC, personal experience.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:28 AM
1

No I've not, but then again I served in a different part of the world. What I'm saying is, the USMC is trying to talk the talk, but do they walk the walk? Obvious answer being: no, they can't even talk the talk correctly. . Also, acting like a bitch in heat just to get some dick is not rape, and not illegal, the man has the option to keep it in his trousers. Usually manipulative, though, as in the examples I've seen, it was mostly female enlists trying to snag / pregnancy-trap themselves an offi…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:20 AM
1

Fair is the best law can aspire to. Any notion of balancing for biology and such is the slippery slope of affirmative action / social engineering / minority supremacy the the left has successfully pushed upon us.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 09:16 AM
11

Nice. How many females has the USMC prosecuted or disciplined for sexual assault? For rape? . From the Gov't Accountability Office, pages 44-45, regarding sexual assault awareness briefings in the Armed Forces: Navy: “it’s not just male on female—it’s also male on male, female on female.” Army: one single female on male example. But it's called 'assault', not 'rape', and is not included in female personnel training. Air Force: no male victims in basic training, a few in advanced, but perpetrator…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:15 PM
1

Part of Europe is already on its way to extinction, and Japan has a foot in the grave. Not that it matters much from a purely numerical point of view. North America + Europe (including the UK and Russia) is what? 1.3 billion? By 2050, that'll be <15% of the world's population. Curbing that would probably have less effect, and less immediate, than curbing our ressources consumption.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 11:51 AM
4

I'd hate to be shot with my own gun. Title IX is a weapon. Feminists are waging a war. The collateral victim is the world as we know it.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 08:35 AM
1

Democrats are overall feeling less oppressed with time. Oh noes! INTERNALIZED MISANDRY!
/r/MensRights07/10/16 08:30 AM
8

This is exactly why communism failed, and why 'social activism', including feminism, will kill the Western world.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 08:25 AM
1

You don't need excuses to not date the fat. Just refuse to be shamed into what you do not desire. If a woman can find herself both obese and beautiful, good for her. It does not entitle her to dick. . As for dating 'older' or infertile women: why not? Whatever floats your boat. Sex is not necessarily reproductive. But yeah, it's a sad fact for the 40-something career woman that a 40-something career man desiring children will turn to younger women. It's just common sense. Should have seen it com…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 08:19 AM
1

I'd say most of the people here live in countries with barely or sub-renewal birth rates. It's not like the G20 is breeding insanely. . Edit: I keep forgetting India in the G20.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 08:12 AM
4

Marriage in the 21st century: a quaint, forgotten tradition of the 20th century.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 08:06 AM
3

It will be a loss for everyone. I'd rather it'd be fair, but that's probably wishful thinking on my part.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 08:03 AM
12

Young people are being chaperoned through the minefield of sexuality, often against their will. Who laid these mines? . The gist of the problem now is not simply refusing to be shamed. The thought police has been made into law, and it's much harder tot take down law than to tell a bunch of rainbow-coloured land whales to sod off.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:34 PM
3

Not how they're not bitter that no woman could reach the required level of qualification. Only that no woman was chosen.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:30 PM
1

Don't need the future when you have the past. Social change has often been in the form of collapse, or conquest.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:27 PM
2

Because MRM is not about opposing feminism, it's about advocating a just society where men have the same actual rights as women. Feminism opposes MRM because it's a supremacist hate movement. Its roots are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 12:15 PM
7

Original study by Laura Parson, Ph.D, Clinical Assistant Professor, Dep. of Educational Leadership, U. of Louisville. She's one of these people who went into gender studies to study STEM. Love her picture. She's trying to decide whether the undead thing crawling up her ass is a good or a bad thing. She writes: As these examples show, the STEM syllabi explored in this study demonstrated a view of knowledge that was to be acquired by the student, which promotes a view of knowledge as unchanging. T…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 12:09 PM
0

The argument is so thin, I'm not sure the piece is pro- or anti-Trump...
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:41 AM
3

Because they are.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:33 AM
5

Men tend to be producers, women tend to be consumers. People who can't be bothered to work usually lean to the left. Still, historically significant. . Edit: typo
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:32 AM
4

Feminism has slut-acceptance and body-acceptance. MRM has diverging-opinions-acceptance. Go figure.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:09 PM
1

We need reversible vasectomy. Solves so many issues.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:05 PM
2

import feminist_logic.lib; Oh, but there are far more cases, as we know that barely 5% of these cases are actually reported. Men are oppressed by a raep kultchur too! . @feminist_logic.lib: compiler error.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:04 PM
15

Archive Ah well, that's the logical conclusion of anti-fat-shaming campaigns: trying to shame good-looking blokes into shagging fatties. The guy here is not even really rude in his discourse, just very factual. But it's really stupid and probably insecure to rub their faces in it. He (claims he) has a rather high market value, and even if he didn't, I don't see on what grounds he should be dictated his personal preferences. . Feminism is the thought police.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 09:00 PM
3

Well, feminism is based on stupid, so any discussion is a loss for them.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:53 PM
4

Change will come from the bottom. Those in power will have to entice men back into the grind.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:52 PM
4

Have you noticed the few millenia of male productivity? Men not buying into their traditional role will change society faster than you think. Most probably through a quickish collapse, but hey, change is change.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:50 PM
4

At least it will cause a public debate. And then, either of two things: MRAs are deluded, and the world is a safe, happy place, and will go on merrily more men will realise they're getting screwed over, which could make for an interesting time. All in all a good test.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:02 PM
11

The war on men will continue until someone (or a lot of someones) realizes this is biting the hand that feeds. Obviously, by then, there wil be no easy fix. Or maybe no fix.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 02:36 PM
2

1/ The oppression Olympics are based in feels, not facts. 2/ Women dominate up until SAT, and the real world where real shite needs be done. Girls are queens of the female educational bubble. Now they need to grow up.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 11:51 AM
2

spam
/r/MensRights04/10/16 02:01 PM
7

Feminism is cancer.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:00 PM
4

Decadence is part of the cycle. We have grown complacent, and these are our ills. However grand their claims may be, feminism is a symptom, not a cause. . Edit, to be clear. Leniency toward male under-performance is counter-selective, as it leads to overall less bacon being brought home, and less houses being built. It is and probably will be socially counter-selected, because societies which encourage it will fade. Leniency toward female under-performance is slightly deleterious or neutral: the…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 12:16 PM
1

Caught in a landslide? Although the "just killed a man" part is not funny in context.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 11:44 AM
10

Is there a length limit to that text box? Because the names of my people reflect your life history. Mine is only 15643 word long, and my nickname 378. Are vowels mandatory? It's written 'fgjjrootngkkd' but it's pronounced 'Aubrey'. . That thing is so abusable...
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:19 AM
12

Pure social Darwinism. A successful society has to be harder on men, because men are the primary producers. On the other hand, female failure to perform is no big deal. On a individual basis, women always have a plan B: it's called marriage. Men don't. . In the US, men are ~55% of the workforce, and > 70% of taxable income. The workhorse gets the whip, the cow is left to graze.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 09:01 AM
1

Well, giving sperm is a tad more personal than giving blood. Done the latter, never the former. Where have all the good men gone to wank?
/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:44 AM
29

Nutshell: Judge receives letters of support for female rapist, none for 15 y-o male victim. Judge denounces double-standard and fucked-up community. Rapist "stunned" to be denied pussy pass: 6 to 15. . Note the passive-aggressive approach: nobody wrote to condemn the victim ("he had it coming"), which would be victim-blaming, but they support the perp, erasing the boy. The gap is real. The sympathy gap, the sentencing gap.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:31 PM
3

She missed the perfect opportunity to put up her wedding photographs...
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:18 PM
-1

Which confirms feminism is Communism. Or just a bunch of entitled beggars.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 07:44 AM
3

Grass-root eugenism. . Do British sperm donours get paid? Otherwise someone is monetizing charitable donations.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 07:08 AM
4

Feminist cons her way into position of (little) power. Feminist abuses power. Surprise is scarse. Whyever would you want to post on this sub?
/r/MensRights29/09/16 07:04 AM
14

Yeah, women pushing "fat acceptance" have diktats about men's dicks. That's personal choice for you: you don't have to take intact, I don't have to look at fatties. If it doesn't work for you, lower your standards. . And obligatory gender reversal: what man wants his daughter to have ugly ass nethers? Cosmetic girl part surgery (whatever's in fashion) for every girl!
/r/MensRights29/09/16 07:02 AM
5

You think they could do all this like, ultra-fast :)
/r/MensRights28/09/16 09:24 PM
5

Non-US here, but on the female officer scale, I used to score > 170% ... and I'm a wee lad. On the male scale, well, I was very decent for non-combat. To put it mildly.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 09:22 PM
2

The helmet. She has the Dora the explorer backpack, that's manageable, but the helmet is a real pain in the neck. And the bloody thing won't even stop a bullet.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 09:19 PM
2

You do have a point, and it's somewhat sexist from them. I don't think they would have done it the same way for a man, because it's so fucking insulting.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 09:16 PM
4

YMMV, but when you're an officer, any distance is "only x miles".
/r/MensRights28/09/16 09:13 PM
31

They say feminism frees men too. They say they want male allies (weird spelling for slaves). And now they are invaded. What's the next complaint, the Patriarchy is raping feminism?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:29 PM
30

That woman is a fucking captain? Is the US Army a fucking joke? Officer means you don't have a Carebear row to cheer you on. You keep your bloody upper lip stiff and you trudge on because your men need someone to look up to. You lost your right to complain when you received your rank. . This shows how low they had to go just to parade women in fatigues. For Christ's sake, it was only 12 miles.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 08:24 AM
7

"Domestic violence" has become the current year's new "think of the children". It has horde of politicians eager to jump on what they think is a bandwagon, and is now nothing more than, at best, a shaming libal, and at worst a way to 'legally' control personal behaviour. [PM Turnbull] defended new legal guidelines that define domestic violence as including criticism of a partner’s appearance or housework skills, or remaining silent. Yeah, and with 60% obesity, the US will soon make it a crime no…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:57 AM
5

As far as I know, MGTOWs do not push for changes in law or society. They exert their constitutional right to choose their lifestyle. Some of them may have a poor opinion of woman. That too is a right. This is what sets them apart from feminists: feminism is the thought police. It's a minority aiming to reshape the majority for its own convenience. MGTOW is a consequence whereas feminism is trying to be a cause. . As for toxicity and the ressemblance between MGTOW and Red Pill: you are right, the…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:49 AM
5

Let's accept your argument, and take it to its logical conclusion: fathers should have no rights to their kids, it should be inscribed in law, and men should know it beforehand. Pass these laws, and watch your country die. As I doubt men would go into fatherhood. Also, since men have no rights to the children, they wouldn't have any duty anymore. No child support, no alimony. So you have one answer: men should have a right to their own kids, because saying otherwise destroys family as we know it…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:20 AM
5

Long list of examples of male disposibility in popular culture here. From this page, you can expand into sadly common tropes in the double standards tree, such as Abuse, Female on Male, or the ever funny Rape, Female on Male.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:12 AM
1

Interesting. This list is exposed for all to mock as the whinings of men-babies in their parent's basement. Which the commenters dutifully do. It's eerie. Feminism is so steeped in its victim culture that they think it a good thing that people hate them. They even encourage it by being haughty. Well, it is a good thing. Just, for us, not them.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:14 PM
34

But some good can result from this divorce nightmare if Jolie’s exploitation of the child-protection system exposes its failings and leads to necessary reform. Men's rights are going mainstream. Of course, it's probably just because Western society is bound to collapse from men stepping down from their traditional gender role. Oh well, have to take the bad with the good, I guess.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 01:16 PM
5

Yeah, she's the infamous straw-woman feminist. This straw obviously broke the camel's back.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 10:27 AM
13

Men age like wine, women age like milk...
/r/MensRights23/09/16 02:53 PM
3

forgets all of the junk that existed then I said Pamela Anderson! Although compared to Jersey Shore (is this still a thing?), Baywatch was probably high drama. All the new girls seem to come out the factory that eventually produced Taylor Swift. Except Emma Stone. Dunno why, might be a dash of Hepburn. . seriously: the entertainment industry is even more risk-averse now, which leads both to the clone factory, and the pushing of narrative-reinforcing only clichés like dumb dad and super mum.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 02:25 PM
1

When she's 50 and stops looking underage (although there might be an audience for this). When she grows boobs?
/r/MensRights23/09/16 02:19 PM
3

Don't totally agree. Men used to receive some modicum of respect, because they were bringing home the bacon. Now that women are entitled to magically-appearing bacon, even that is gone.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 11:58 AM
1

That's the thing. Hollywood used to have a spectrum from Meryl Streep to Pamela Anderson. Now we get Lawrence, Watson and Twilight girl: not unfuckable, not untalented, not bringing much of anything to the table. The figureheads of the new generation.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 11:54 AM
1

Underscoring all this, several all-female colleges have started admitting biological men who identify as women. I shall henceupon identify as a female lesbian and resume my higher education!
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:36 AM
1

Only 4% of Democrat-leaning voters think 'vagina' is a valid reason? The woman card isn't working?
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:31 AM
4

“I’m trying to figure out if ‘topple the patriarchy’ is a good thing for me or not. I don’t think it is,” Jimmy Kimmel joked when he got back onstage. That's the thing. These people are <10% of the population, and they call to war against the majority that garantees their freedom. Romans used to feed these people to the lions.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:23 AM
7

Archive.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:21 AM
7

What's the next step? Reality TV?
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:12 AM
2

I'll agree SJWs (feminism included) are compounded by the 1st world problem mentality. As for the 'better', 'older' feminists (my own mum and grandma come to mind): agreed, they were more grounded, but they never even intelectually considered equality. The Great generation was steeped in gender roles. My grandma worked her arse off, but men did the heavy lifting and women the child rearing, and that was the way of the world. She'd call genY whores. The Boomers were about women's lib. They never …
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:09 AM
6

And feminists will call this slut-shaming. Hen parties have definitely crossed the line, and marriage is not prison (at least not for women): there is no "last night of freedom". I wouldn't marry her either, her wedding's just a tickbox to her divorce. Oh, sorry, a "prison break", or "rush to freedom".
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:56 AM
44

Because feminism is a totalitarian grab for power, and not an ideology. It has slaves, not 'allies'. . Typical feminist comment: There is a real stigma that men who are interested in teaching children are just sexual predators, and that women are somehow incapable of that. He couldn't handle it, and now spends his days stocking shelves at costco and drinking too much. There are real things affecting men that should be talked about, but can't be genuinely discussed without the fucking MRAs corrup…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:49 AM
3

The context hasn't changed. Feminism was always about the most entitled: young, middle to upper class white women. They stayed feminists as they aged, and did recruit other, poorer and/or non-white women as cannon fodder and useful idiots, but nothing has changed since the suffragettes. I'll grant that the ideological carpet bombing has grown a lot mre efficient with the Internet.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:40 AM
8

Archive. The author argues about a specific form of anxiety which hits men, for whom (as a class) life has always been incredibly easy, and now complain about the tiny difficulties of life. Next article will probably advise to man up and go back to marriage and the grind. . Men in their 40s [...] for whom the future always seemed to resemble a long straight line peppered with green lights. Have never existed in significant numbers. . a report suggested that manxiety doubles your changes of getti…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:35 AM
1

We do agree. This is a sad state of things, but change is either pragmatic or revolutionary.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:37 AM
2

Parasites do care about the host's well-being, in a way. Forbes articles are not really about women (indirectly, as they are a vector for consumer goods). Our society was built on the back of men, and this model becomes untenable when men opt out and women don't step up.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:36 AM
0

It may be, probably is actually, but it'd be easier to argue from an example of actual unfairness.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:33 AM
1

As of now, men-only programs get shut down. Even men-only gyms get shut down. The guy needs to push forward an equal access to ressources. Or he gets shut down. Sad, but there wouldn't be a MRM if the whole world wasn't geared towards women.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 09:25 PM
3

Archive. . Divorce in the Principality will only divide wealth that has been commonly created by the couple. If you had no money when you married someone rich, you'll probably have not much more when you divorce. This sounds suspiciously fair. I must be a chauvinist pig shitelord. /s [In London] you can get a divorce settlement in London, even when you have already been divorced in another country. And now this sounds suspiciously unfair. Pandering, even. Let's play double jeopardy. decisions ca…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 06:40 PM
3

From what little I know, Lawrence has more 'star power' currently than Pratt, so I don't really see a problem.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 06:30 PM
0

Never said they needed access. But they must have it. It's equality.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 06:27 PM
12

No I can't, and it's probably not 100% anyway. My source is talking with a Spaniard (well, as long as Catalonia is part of Spain) who worked for a spell in one of these courts. His anecdotes were quite horrible. He has since found himself another job. In southern France.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 04:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter