TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Black_caped_man Archive

View 2 posts and 1,079 comments by Black_caped_man on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,079 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Funny how a university English professor doesn't know the etymology of the word man or mankind. Early on the word man was synonymous with person, essentially it still is although it has a double meaning as referring to a male human. Words with multiple meanings are not uncommon in languages and their meaning is easily derived from context. Spring for example has plenty of meanings but I doubt people would argue that the metal coil shape has something to do with the season. I can't be bothered to…
/r/MensRights09/05/20 12:50 PM
4

One person's trash is another persons treasure. On the sexual marketplace men's sexual desire is pretty much worthless and women's sexual desire is generally thought of as valuable. If I were to express my sexual desire to you that would more likely be seen in society as me handing you a piece of trash, whereas if you were to express a similar sexual desire towards me it would be seen as you giving me a piece of treasure. Now if someone gives you a piece of unwanted trash against your will that'…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 10:48 AM
3

It's a bit of a leap of logic yeah but not really as far as some people here seem to think. Things have meaning beyond what is directly stated, that's not just some idea taken out of nowhere that's how reality works. Just because you say something doesn't make it true. I respect you too much to have sex on the first date Lets dissect the quote a little to find out what we can infer from it. First of all what would lead one to say something like that? A safe assumption would be a situation where …
/r/MensRights31/12/19 08:32 AM
19

Just thought I'd mention that they are factually wrong, the center party is not the third largest party in Sweden it's (as of the election last year) the fourth largest with the third largest party having more than twice as many votes. It's also not alone in working against circumcision, it's now joining the Swedish Democrats (over 17.5% in the last election) and the Left party (8%) in being against ritual infant circumcision. I still don't think it's going to happen but I'm not going to let go …
/r/MensRights08/12/19 05:22 PM
9

Okay so just a few pieces of facts. The foreskin has the highest concentration of nerve endings on the entire penis. It also happens to contain the most of the nerve endings related to fine touch similar to the lips and fingertips. It also contains rather few nerves focused on pain, again like the lips and fingertips. Meanwhile the glans is rather sensitive to pain but also contains nerves that focus on deep pressure. Circumcision does not utterly destroy the ability to feel sexual pleasure, not…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 08:45 PM
1

Something something power fantasy something something. What always bothered me about the power fantasy argument is that it's just as applicable to Barbie or a lot of other female superheroes. The major difference is that men aren't considered nearly as desirable visually as women regardless of how they look. People look at He-Man and say power fantasy and they look at She-Ra and say sex symbol. How is it not a power fantasy for anyone to imagine themselves as powerful and being ridiculously phys…
/r/MensRights29/06/19 09:53 AM
7

Well it's not a parasite by definition since that requires them to be two different species. However the relationship between a fetus and the woman who carries it is definitely parasitic if the baby is unwanted. If the baby is wanted you could argue it being a symbiotic relationship.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 05:03 PM
2

The issue isn't that they don't want to be mothers, the issue is that they don't want to go through with a pregnancy, especially in a country with the highest maternal mortality rate in the developed world. That's just looking at deaths too, not mentioning all the absolutely fucked up shit that happens to a womans body. This has nothing to do with parenthood at all, because a woman can still give a child up for adoption or just drop it off at a safe haven location. I agree that it's totally unfa…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 12:39 PM
1

Hey man, no problem. Circumcision is a topic that's incredibly emotionally loaded, I wish it didn't have the effect that it does on me as well but it does. It's one hell of a rabbit hole to go down and there's just so much misinformation there. The worst part is that it's really hard to know just how much to bring up in discussions like these. If I bring up too much it will just be a chore to read, and I'll likely come off as overzealous, if I bring up too little there's a big risk that I won't …
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:21 PM
6

Obviously this measure is not perfect. What objective measure would you propose? One that does does not just look for the easiest measurable stats in order to try and prove the amount of meaningful work which was contributed. Lines of code as a metric alone is essentially useless and harping on that statistic alone as an eye-catcher is really not helping and just making "our side" look like bitter cunts who would rather put a man in the spotlight. We should be the ones calling for the recognitio…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:08 PM
15

In short, the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis, functionally analogous to the clitoris even if it's not anatomically so. Circumcision only removes the risk of any issues regarding the actual foreskin itself, you can't break an arm if you don't have any. There is no real conclusive evidence that says foreskin gives any sort of protection against any type of STD's and in the studies that do show a correlation it's definitely not high enough to warrant calling it protection. If it w…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:46 AM
3

Phimosis is the natural state of the penis until the early to late teens, some men even have phimosis for their entire lives without it being pathological. When a boy is born the foreskin is fused to head of the penis with the same kind of tissue attachment that keeps your nails your fingers. This is a natural and healthy condition and this tissue generally doesn't go away until the boy is around 10 years old though the age when this happens varies greatly. This is why you should never ever forc…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 08:36 AM
15

As a healthcare professional you really should consider going back to school before continuing your practice. Smegma (Greek smēgma[1]) is a combination of shed skin cells, skin oils, and moisture. It occurs in both male and female mammalian genitalia. In female bodies, it collects around the clitoris and in the folds of the labia minora; in males, smegma collects under the foreskin. Literally the first paragraph on wikipedia.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 01:41 PM
26

That shit is bothering me to no end. I actually agree with a lot of left leaning stuff like gay marriage (under the law, I don't agree with forcing a church to wed a couple that would go against their faith), universal healthcare, the right to have an abortion, etc. However I'm pretty much a racist, sexist, homophobic, nazi, fascist, whatever simply because I also disagree on a lot of issues and because I also care about men's rights and men's issues. Because I actually see issues with massive n…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 10:04 AM
1

I cook my own meals, I don't want kids, I wash my own clothes, I don't know what she means by "make your home" but if I want to make a house there are experts I can pay to do that so everything is stable. It's funny how she lists things that pretty much every adult should be able to manage on their own. Now sadly a sex doll can't give me the intimacy I want from a partner but there's also no risk of a sex doll charging me with rape, lying about birth control to get pregnant, or being physically …
/r/MensRights11/02/19 08:15 AM
3

A big problem with all of this is that there's so much weight put on the entire topic to begin with and sort of by its very nature it's also a bit abstract in that the lines fade the closer you try to look at things. Saying things like toxic masculinity or toxic femininity will get most people naturally defensive to some degree. The thing is that Toxic masculinity is often portrayed as being kept alive by just men when there are plenty of women who also reward and further toxic ideals and expect…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 03:03 PM
0

I may be a bit too charitable but I think she's trying to firstly exaggerate for impact and secondly using arguments from her opponents against them. Pregnancies do have a pretty high risk of imposing permanent physical change, and childbirth is still incredibly risky with high risks of permanent damage and albeit a much lower risk (however not insignificant) but still a risk of death. ​ Her arguments can definitely be seen as coming from a mind that thinks women are oppressed and wishing to tur…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:00 PM
46

Also even if women as a group are privileged in the west that doesn't mean that individual women won't face hardships etc. I don't argue that things like sexism or whatever doesn't exist only that it's not on an institutional or large scale systemic level, at least in the west.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 12:10 PM
1

They were at the gym and given the quote of what he said I'd say it's enough to not really be presumptuous. I mean I know that for some people asking out others at the gym is something perfectly okay but for a lot of people they go to the gym to workout and not really socialize with strangers. I know that last part is getting kinda close to the "if you are a man the only time and place where you can ask a woman out is never and nowhere" but in this case I know a lot of guys who get hit on at the…
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:35 AM
4

Ah yes, let's go with humankind, but it's a bit long to say so after a while how about we shorten it to 'mankind, then after another long while we'll drop the apostrophe and just use mankind so we can start this entire merry go 'round again.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:27 AM
22

Seriously? That's where we are going with this? I get that it's shitty to be looked at as a potential bad guy or whatever but this is just an innocuous nice act and nothing to get ones panties in a twist over. The woman is not being confrontational, she's not saying anything out of the ordinary or anything like that. She just found a way to know whether or not the other woman was okay and at the same time offering a smooth way out. Do I think that women in general should be able to clearly just …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 07:05 PM
31

When society treats you like a criminal regardless of what you have done or not done, at some point you start believing them and think "why the fuck not?".
/r/MensRights02/02/18 07:25 PM
3

So in the quote he says that women can do this and that they have this power. Allowing for some interpretation of this I'd guess that the meaning is that some female journalists utilize this power and not all. I find it quite amusing that so many female journalists get so up in arms about all this. As if it were some grand secret that they had this power? What the guy is saying is basically that female journalists have an intrinsic ability to be able to willingly get good stories that men do not…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 02:01 AM
5

While that should be the most important point, legally in many places it's actually not sadly.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:31 AM
3

Just because I like something doesn't mean that I'm making it about me, although I think that article may offer a pretty clear look into the mind of the person who wrote it. Mainly that they are probably incredibly selfish both in and outside the bedroom.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:27 AM
11

You obviously don't understand how averages work. The information we have about the average woman or man is pretty close to useless when it comes to individual cases. We can use what we know about the average to determine the chance that any random man or woman has a specific trait, however just because we know the chance doesn't mean it's actually useful in any prediction. Say we pick a random woman, we know there's a 20% chance that she'll want to be in tech (not a real figure, just an example…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 09:56 PM
3

And like I said, I agree with some of his points. I want to be judged on individual merit, but not based on what aspects my sex affects those merits. Does that make sense? It does makes sense and that's exactly the argument that the memo makes. The reason biology is brought into this is that you can't use individual cases when looking at group statistics. Statistics say that there are more men than women in tech and higher positions and biological statistics gives a pretty good reason for why th…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:15 PM
17

Well then obviously you didn't read that section very carefully or even at all. He stated numerous times the caveat that everything he talked about was averages within the two population groups and that these averages should in no way shape or form be used when looking at specific individuals. He even went so far as to make a pretty good visual example of why this is and explained why it is bad to make this assumption and why that is not what he's doing here. Also he never talks about how women …
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:00 PM
5

There are no hygienic benefits to circumcision, in fact there are some hygienic downsides. For example having an open wound on an infant child. Consider what happens when this child is in diapers with this wound. After that you also lose the self cleaning properties that the foreskin provides. There are more exposed crevices etc where dirt and other things can gather.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 04:37 PM
5

Okay I'll bite, why are you glad for it? What part of being circumcised elevates it beyond neutral status?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 04:28 PM
2

No it's not sexist, it's about as sexist as the fact that female dominated professions tends to have lower pay. The reasoning is not because of sex or gender but because of other factors. The reason it's illegal to buy but legal to sell is so not to punish those who may be forced into prostitution. Which in Sweden is a vast majority of prostitution. Just like teachers getting paid less than car mechanics has nothing to do with the gender of those who work with it but with market forces and clien…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 08:12 AM
2

Thanks man. I really hope they win, for Sweden's sake. I don't, don't get me wrong they are definitely needed in the current political climate, the sad part is that the party is basically only held up by their leader and perhaps a small number of other people. Like somebody else said you don't really "win" in Swedish elections since our government and parliament requires cooperation. As it is now even if they did become the biggest party they do not have the capacity to govern. They do not have …
/r/MensRights25/06/17 08:07 AM
2

I think a simpler solution is to just have gender neutral bathrooms or possibly that and urinals. Another solution is to not base the bathrooms on gender but rather on the actual parts that do the urinating.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 07:48 AM
2

I'm straight, I only date women, I only have sex with women, this does not mean I'm somehow magically anti-men. All it means is that I'm not sexually nor romantically attracted to anyone that isn't a woman. Whether they be trans, attack helicopter, or whatever else. Whether I'd find aliens attractive is something I'll deal with at the time if that situation ever presents itself.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:51 AM
-1

Everyday?
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:44 AM
0

Okay so apparently a lot of public toilets don't have a lid (they do where I'm from) but even without the lid I still consider the default position of the seat to be in the down position. It's the courteous thing to do to return something into its default position once you have used it in my opinion. If the toilet has a lid I can't really understand what sort of logic one would use as to why it should be left up. To be honest I don't really understand why the seat of the toilet is liftable in th…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:06 AM
9

This is quite probable but it's also important for her to know that if something like that happened to her it doesn't mean that this is a similar situation. I used to live through that stuff as well, I'm kinda sensitive about physical contact and had a grandmother who would hug and kiss me and everyone would just laugh at my protests, I never even liked her to begin with.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 12:34 PM
12

Your religious freedom only extends as far as your own self. Circumcising a child due to religious reasons is akin to branding the child with the mark of that religion for life. The child has a right to religious freedom as well, and by circumcising it you are taking that freedom from them.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 11:09 AM
9

Honestly to bring some awareness about a practice that people barely shrug at hearing mentioned. There are lots of people like you that would be fucking shocked to see what actually goes on during the procedure that happens so many times in the US and some other countries. 100 babies a year die from circumcision in the US alone. Not to mention the point of the procedure in itself which is just ridiculous. If you have a weak stomach I wouldn't watch it, I got far enough that we saw the restraints…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:08 AM
7

If you for some reason want to be even more disgusted then the following youtube link is a video of a circumcision taking place. NSFL: https://youtu.be/0OkVvPuMIK4 I personally can't bear to watch it because it makes me sick and I have seen similar videos before. There's usually a heart wrenching scream that I have heard from parents stating it does not sound like any other baby scream they have heard. Remember that very often in America the anesthetic used may not yet have taken effect due to i…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:31 AM
27

I just don't understand the fascination with what random people spout off on social media. I don't really either but the general public eats that shit up for breakfast. Posts like this ("witty" social media comments screen captured) tend to be heavily upvoted anywhere on reddit actually. Think of it like fast food, it's seriously low quality but still people eat it up en masse.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:34 PM
10

Men seem to be so cowed that they can't fight back, and it's time they did. The problem is that the narrative is set up in such a way that fighting back would also be playing directly into their hands. "Look! Typical male, just responding with violence/power play/dominance, just like we said." And there are plenty of men, already subdued by the message that will stand up and "protect" the way things are if we were to fight back as well.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:23 PM
2

I may be wrong, but perhaps its a social issue in that genital mutilation is accepted as wrong for females but widely done to boys because its a completely normalised procedure, often vocated for by men themselves. Personally I think it's a social issue not because of the disparity between sexes but because it's an issue at all in the first place. It is the amputation of healthy tissue without consent and from not only a minor but most often an infant. The disparity between the sexes is what mak…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 06:37 AM
2

I believe however that we men have a greater responsibility to speak up against it. Why? Because we have similarly shaped genitals we are suddenly more responsible for the actions of other people completely unrelated to us? Had this been about sharing a religion, or political label, or other system of belief you may have had a fraction of a point. As it is now what you are saying is basically the same as holding all black people more responsible for any crime committed by a black person.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 04:44 PM
1

For crying out loud, this happens to them every fucking time there's more than a light powder falling from the sky. The city has a yearly budget for snow clearing and similar things and they will do pretty much anything to overuse it. In this case I'm willing to bet a fair amount that the city officials hoped that there would only be light snowfall and that it would melt away before it could stick to the ground. Yeah the "feminist" snowclearing policy is fucked up but this kind of snow chaos is …
/r/MensRights14/11/16 03:18 PM
1

"yes, hitting is wrong no one should anyone, but men especially shouldn't hit a woman back, most men are stronger than most women, a man can restrain her or walk away. Only if his life is threatened should he hit her back. This is biology. It's nature, it can't be changed. That's why this double standard exists. Men are inherently physically stronger than women" This comment often comes up whenever the "equal rights equal lefts" argument comes up. The thing is I never hear people talk about powe…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:24 PM
2

I believe the idea is to fight sex tourism. Sex trafficking has very little to do with the age of consent, because you are still not allowed to charge for the sex.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:59 PM
12

Look if you are going to focus on men's issues, and I mean actually seriously get an understanding for them from the ground up you are going to see a picture that's basically the opposite of anything feminist theory will tell you. That is the real reason for why men's rights often clashes with feminism, that is the reason for why if you are a men's rights activist you will most likely also have antifeminist leanings. Let's take a common feminist argument, a man will be told he throws like a girl…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:51 PM
2

Apparently they played defensively and "safe", would another play style have given them a clearer win? Who knows, all we know is that they did win. I love the response from the Swedish coach though It's okay to be a coward if you win. It's very likely that they played strategically where the odds of winning would have been much lower if they played offense. Then again I know next to nothing about football.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 03:12 AM
5

Key word here being back! All those men who want the right to hit women back have been assaulted and probably physically abused by a woman and had no way to physically defend themselves in that situation lest they be thrown in jail. They are asking for the right to defend themselves.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 06:36 AM
1

We'd encourage, even force - girls to step forward first This article is a mixed bag for me, there's the part in me that doesn't really believe her description of the girls in class, then there's another part of me that actually does. It's been a long time since I was in school though so things may have changed. The quoted line however is where she actually struck gold, it's a shame she didn't bother to see where that very reasoning came from. If I were to take every event she describes as truth…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 06:05 AM
1

Remember that we all deal with similar situations in different ways. I literally don't care about what happened to me. Even when I intentionally relive those particular moments I can't care more than I would if someone punched me in the face. It's fully possible that it just doesn't bother you but given the fact that you previously mentioned that you buried all the feelings regarding what happened to you I think this is just a self preservation thing. I'm not a psychiatrist so I don't know all t…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 05:11 AM
1

It's true, and I have seen a lot of the women there be very sympathetic towards men's issues, especially when it comes to kids. Most of them can actually realize that getting stuck with a kid would be hell for us too even if we don't get pregnant. It's just a shame that many of the same people seem to just wholeheartedly swallow the "evil misogynistic MRA" thing, making that all they see when they take a quick look here. I don't need them to be allies, but I'd really like it if they didn't hold …
/r/MensRights16/07/16 06:46 PM
1

Things can change and things actually do change a whole lot, it just doesn't always look like much. Male shelters for domestic violence are slowly appearing, it's not much but it's a start. The discourse against the prominent narrative is growing larger, antifeminism on you tube for example has never been bigger or more popular, most of them don't identify as MRA but as far as I'm aware most of them are sympathetic to our cause and care about a lot of the same issues. I don't care what they want…
/r/MensRights15/07/16 12:57 AM
14

Does it qualify as irony that she's shaming men's sexuality in pretty much the same statement where she claims to empower women's sexuality? Also hasn't she heard, there's no way to escape the male gaze, the great eye is ever watchful. Which reminds me, Sauron's tower with the eye thing is totally a penis.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 10:35 AM
3

Where are all the virulent campaigns against the new Ninja Turtles series I'm pretty sure most people are saying the new Turtles movies are pretty bad, but just like transformers they appeal to the base criteria for the masses so they get a lot of moviegoers. Also none of the previous turtle movies had the reputation of being the masterpiece people think the original Ghostbusters was. Another thing, look at what happened to the batman franchise after Batman and Robin, it nearly killed the genre …
/r/MensRights13/07/16 01:23 AM
1

Uh, you do mean the antagonists right? Or well, both actually.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 01:02 AM
1

Statistically women who kill their children are most often mentally ill. But sometimes I wonder if this statistic is such because they are actually ill, or if people force the "mentally ill" excuse on these women in order to pardon them. It's one of those crimes that people think are particularly heinous that they can't be committed by a sane person, that the mere act would make you insane by definition. The problem with this is I think it's easier for people to come to this conclusion with a wo…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 06:18 PM
7

On the one hand I agree with you, on the other I have seen her be quite professional when she needs to be. I still don't really like her and to be honest there really isn't anyone, male or female, who could ever hope to replace Steven Fry. I also would not put it past her to angle things towards her ideology even if it is subtly done. So yeah... I don't expect QI to survive for much longer.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 07:40 AM
1

Patriarchy tells men to want sex Yeah I'm pretty sure that's something akin to nature, instinct, and biology (aka hormones). Does patriarchy tell women to be bitchy when on their periods as well? Is mood swings during pregnancy just a social construct? How many times can I bang my head against the wall before either breaks or my neighbors come to complain? Also yes, meninism started as a parody mirror image of feminism, basically just flipping the genders of feminist statements. As far as I'm aw…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 09:44 PM
2

There is a saying that goes something like "quitting your job is the best thing you can do". Naturally this is like with all motivational quotes a simplification and to be taken with a hefty amount of salt. Still the way you did it is a way to stand on your own side and ultimately "winning" that situation. I did something similar once, I knew my boss was going to suggest I leave so I had prepared though and while we were talking before he could say it I told him that I was going to make it easy …
/r/MensRights09/07/16 09:39 PM
2

Det är nog inte så mycket för dem utan mer för de nyfikna som hittar dit och ännu inte blivit helt hjärntvättade.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 05:45 AM
2

Har du Twitter? Jag har inte skaffat det ännu men jag känner ändå att de behöver veta att de inte var först med "she for he" CAFE höll en paneldiskussion angående detta ämnet för två-tre månader sedan. Honeybadgerradios Alison Tieman tillsammans med Karen Straughan och hela deras gäng har lagt ner mycket jobb på samma satsning. Här är några videoklipp kring det hela: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKDV_f5AM4s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5E6hvGemYU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI-6Y41DjY…
/r/MensRights02/07/16 12:47 AM
1

Got a reply Thanks for the input. She didn't plead to statutory rape, so legally I can't say she committed statutory rape. I share your sentiment, though, on the overall idea. I'll take that. Could someone enlighten me to what the difference is between having sex with a minor and committing statutory rape? I was under the impression that they were the same thing.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 04:51 AM
7

Once you factor out interview data from both men and women who quit after one or two bad interviews, the disparity goes away entirely. There were a lot of interesting things there but this one is especially important. I wouldn't be surprised if you found the same similarity in other fields as well. If you factor out the tendency to quit after facing struggle I'm fairly certain things like promotion rates, raises, etc would balance out quite well. Assuming of course that you already factored out …
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:29 PM
32

Whoa, since this is a ten year friendship has she always been that overreacting? Seriously from what the BF is writing I worry about the mental health of your friend (well, ex friend now I suppose). Seriously that is not a normal reaction to the kind of basic criticism that you gave in your comment. Either that or the boyfriend is the one overreacting or having a bad influence on her. I don't want to pry to much and you probably know best but I just wanted to raise the possibility.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 02:59 AM
1

I haven't read any books or surrounding matierals so I know nothing outside of what is mentioned in the movie. From what I understood Finn is somewhat of an anomaly in the process and has somehow been able to slip through the cracks. I kinda thought the first order trained their own soldiers (storm troopers) and that Finn started out in the lowest rank and was sent to do maintenance etc. Basically solidifying that he wasn't ever really very good or much of a fighter. The movie left a lot of that…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 09:51 PM
3

I don't know what it is with the word but I have serious gripes with the term sexualization. In your examples I can't see Megan Fox as sexualized, I see her as already sexy. Sexualizing a character is for me like rule 34 or stuff like that. I sort of both get what you mean but at the same time I don't see much wrong with a heroine being sexy.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:35 PM
14

I'm working on a small brainchild trying to rewrite TFA or mostly everything regarding Rey's character in order to "salvage" her. Honestly I kind of like that Finn is the bumbling doofus because that allows us to watch him grow. In all honesty Finn is a much more engaging character than Rey is throughout the entire movie. He acts as sort of the eyes of the audience in a way, he has no real skills no real desire for fighting and he's afraid and lost and alone. Still he fights on in the chaos war …
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:28 PM
1

The title mentions that this is a systematic behavior on her part, whether consciously or unconsciously.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:48 AM
0

But the thing is that men have centuries of patriarchal privilege so acting the same way towards a man and a woman isn't really equal. It's not actually emotional abuse from a woman because she automatically comes from a position of oppression and her partner from a position of privilege. At least that's my take on how feminism dodges that particular hurdle.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:43 AM
8

Well that explains the Huffington post then.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 06:09 PM
1

Let's not go the way of the sith shall we.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:05 AM
1

The course is on men and masculinity. Not sociology. The tool it's using is sociology but that's just not sufficient to understand masculinity. The course was on men and masculinity and she described it further by saying that it would be examined using sociology and not biology. You can argue that the course is taking a narrow viewpoint by doing so but it's still right there in the course. I don't know enough about sociology to go into how important biology may or may not be however. I do think …
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:02 AM
2

It's quite possible, the early hunter gatherer societies are actually very much like animal packs, there's a limit to how large they can get before they have to split and one has to find new territory. Human sacrifice is something more connected with post agriculture times though, since the most evidence we have of that comes from at least semi permanent settlements. In hunter gatherer societies nature itself should prove proficient enough to regulate population size.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:10 PM
2

Well I suppose you could say that agriculture is what led to more babies surviving into adulthood, women living longer and being fertile longer, etc etc. This is what led to there being more babies and children. Hunter gatherer societies are limited in how many babies and children they can sustain. Too many babies leads to them needing much more food and larger shelter in order to provide for them all. Just because there was a lot of babies being made in those societies doesn't mean there wasn't…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:00 PM
3

In hunter gatherer societies women only menstruated once or twice a year. There was basically something similar to when animals were in heat. We were more in touch with our animal instincts in those days as well. There were systems in place in those early societies dictating when sexual activity was allowed and not allowed. This was to regulate the amount of babies born because resources were scarce. When we started agriculture we had more resources and could support more children and thus expan…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 08:18 AM
1

from the 70s which debunks it using the exact same data and research that is used to debunk it today: Didn't the equal pay act pass in the '60s? I think it would be better to look for evidence for gender discrimination earlier decades. The closest I know is the fact that there was a kind of segregation regarding the kind of work men and women did. Different work gets different pay of course and therein lies the base for the gender pay gap.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 09:41 AM
9

I don't agree with the first message on page three, men aren't told to accept themselves and get laid they are told to accept their situation change themselves and get laid. The big part here is that men are often encouraged to change parts of their behavior, taking responsibility for their current situation and do something to change it for the better. If you told a woman that you'd simply be called a misogynist or heartless, or something like that. There are a multitude of physical and psychol…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:27 PM
36

Everyone deserves a base level of respect, and most people do receive this level of respect. Everything else is either earned or lost by the way the people behave and present themselves. For example if you dress in a nice suit and walk with a good posture and speak with an assured voice people will respect you more. If you are humble but still carry a lot of self respect people will also respect you a lot more. That is if you don't keep trying to be a martyr but actually take responsibility for …
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:18 PM
6

When I say feminists I mean the feminists who claim that feminism is about the equality between men and women. I wouldn't expect big feminist organizations to fund it but I kinda would expect them to bring it to the spotlight. I'm sure it's something that individual feminists may find awesome but apparently not awesome enough to bring to the spotlight or even mention at all. The main reasons being the ones I mentioned above, that this would have a quite big direct effect on the lives of a lot of…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:49 PM
28

Why isn't feminism supporting this? It's a great way for women to not have to rely on hormonal BC that ducks with their bodies? Also a great way to put more of the responsibility of BC on men. It should be right up their alley.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:51 AM
3

Feminism is at war with patriarchy, feminism has always been at war with patriarchy, feminism is allied with patriarchy, feminism has always been allied with patriarchy. Doublethink.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:55 AM
1

I was expecting this to be exaggerated and flawed like a lot of news about Sweden tend to be here but it's fully legit. I'm going to see if it's possible to report this because it is discrimination. Favoring one group over another is discrimination, pure and simple. The issue here is that women in general have lower paying jobs than the men have and maybe also jobs where you don't really leave the place to go out for lunch. But it's a generalization and not a rule, not all women make less than m…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:50 AM
2

But that's.... Ooooooh!
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:09 AM
1

Um... there's this thing called every sport ever, I'm not sure if you have heard of it.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 07:59 AM
3

Of course she won't, what kind of monster are you? Can't you see that she's sick? She needs TREATMENT nor PUSNISHMENT! She can't help the way she is and that this patriarchal society won't lift a finger to help her but only want's to put her in jail because she's a woman! /S
/r/MensRights03/05/16 07:55 AM
4

Definitely! And most people seem to justify it with "he knows what he was like when he was that age". I honestly have trouble believing that so many guys think so lowly about women at that age. Yeah they are probably horny and want to explore their sexuality but I'm pretty sure most guys, while bummed, would definitely respect a no or visible signs of discomfort from the girl. It also completely denies the fact that girls want to explore their sexuality and emphasize the idea that male sexuality…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:30 PM
2

Cool, I had no idea it was posted here so recently.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:35 PM
3

I noticed a considerable upswing in my enjoyment of sex once I realized that I was supposed to feel good as well, and that there was more to it than what I had been told. Everything around sex was so much better when it was a mutual thing than the one sided thing you mostly hear about. Sadly it has meant one more restriction when if comes to finding a partner. There seem to be a fair amount of women interested in men's pleasure during sex but not a lot of them seem open to what that entails. To …
/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:24 PM
2

I suggest contacting the honeybadgers on honeybadger radio, I suppose Allison or Brian would be best. I don't know how much they have on their plates given the recent "she for he" thing but they are both very passionate about their work on men's rights. I already saw someone suggested Karen so I'll just echo that. You should find contact info on their YouTube channel (just search honeybadgerradio). As for feminists I'm not sure how to best get in contact with the right people. I know there's an …
/r/MensRights27/04/16 12:53 PM
2

In response to a comment you got in that thread. That said, I think you should do some more research about womens rights and such before debating it online. When a vast majority of CEO's, Congress, the Executive branch, etc., are men and not women, you need to have some pretty convincing evidence to support your claim that men are at a disadvantage in the US. Really anywhere in the world, women lag behind men in voting rights, right to work, freedom of speech, etc. It's funny that this guy hasn'…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 12:35 PM
2

In many cases they do, I hear the process is automated when you apply for your drivers license in some states.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 12:02 PM
5

This is something I have thought about whenever it's mentioned that men are quiet during sex. The common explanation is that we are quiet during masturbation, but that makes no sense since its the same for women. My theory on that is because for men sex is not really that often a time where they can relax or just enjoy themselves. They have to think about pleasuring the woman they have to think about controlling their own orgasm whereas women are expected to just let it all flow over them. A wom…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:47 AM
2

and men should instead be more willing to speak about their feelings. What's the use of speaking when nobody cares what you have to say? Why would I want to speak about my feelings when all it will ever get me is shit and insults? Have the people who want men to speak up ever tried actually listening to what men have to say? There's the ducking problem!
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:20 AM
4

Man the incestuous undertones in those statements drive me up the ducking wall. What is it about parents and controlling their childrens romantic and sexual lives? What is it about a woman's sexuality that is deemed worthy of protection and what us it about boys sexuality that is so dirty they have to protect their daughters against it? And it's soooo funny to joke about abusing boys and men because the dirty bastards deserve it right? /s
/r/MensRights27/04/16 11:05 AM
1

This is just a general scraping on the surface of the issue though, I'm on my phone now so I can't be bothered to write a longer post about it. I also haven't really begun to verbalize much of the phenomenon. Thing it that there are so many things interconnected that once you start you don't really know where the rabbit hole ends. There's social expectations, different incentives, the greater ability of choice as well at the accompanying burden of choice, entitlement, social narrative, microcult…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 09:15 AM
7

Women are less likely, in general, to strive towards the higher positions. This leads to them being less likely to work as hard or give as much effort to climbing the corporate ladder as their male peers. Women are also less likely to start their own businesses and when they do they are less likely to strive to have them grow and expand as much as their male peers. Now why is this? Incentive! Women have incentives to many other things than corporate success. They can always find a husband and st…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:48 AM
1

I'm extremely careful whenever I mention things that could relate to men's rights or antifeminism IRL. I also try to keep whatever political persona I have online separate from my "real" or "official" presence online. I do this because I want a job sometime in the future and I actually like most of my classmates. I also know the feeling of when I got disillusioned with the world and how hard it may be for others to see that reality. I'm fairly right leaning in my politics and most people at my p…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:34 AM
2

First of all I thought it was common to call young men boys, maybe it's more common with guy nowadays. Still younger than 15 are still called boys no? Second of all we really shouldn't call young men boys because boy is what you called servants or slaves. So much for patriarchal language right? Though maybe this is also an instance of patriarchy hurts men too?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:19 AM
2

Wow, was there really need for name calling? I may have gotten my description wrong but I think I made it pretty clear I'm not really at home with the technicalities of working out. I mean geez man take a chill pill.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:30 PM
2

And the supposed average amount of pull-ups for women was 1,6... I mean even when I was in my worst shape ever and weighed around 220 lbs (fat weight) I could still manage at least one or two pull ups. What would a woman do if she received the punishment of pull ups? All of this just feels ridiculous.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 08:27 AM
6

Pullups are an “equitable metric more related to combat skills such as casualty [evacuation],” and would “be a step toward removing reducing and eliminating the perceived double-standard that exists." Wut How is a double standard "percieved" when: The plan would officially reverse a requirement announced by then-Commandant Gen. James Amos in late 2012 that women would soon be required to do at least three pullups to pass the PFT. Eight would needed for a max score, while men have to belt out 20.…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:16 AM
4

Not sure how long you have been around but if this specific troll is who I think it is rest assured that it's pretty obvious and a genuine troll. I have seen this specific troll in action many times before and I'm quite relieved that the mods are taking these actions. It's of course up to you whether you believe me or not, just thought I'd try to ease your mind a little.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:00 AM
1

I think it's funny that most people who argue we believe the victim does so from the perspective of punishing the named guilty party and not by helping the victim recover. In the end I also hear very little talking about the nature of rape as a crime. Why is raping someone supposedly worse than punching someone in the face for example? What about the fact that the only difference between something pleasurable and desirable is the prior and ongoing consent of the female party? Nobody seems able t…
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:40 AM
1

The head of the penis pretty much only has pain and deep pressure receptors so it's not responsive to sensations like gentle touch etc.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:41 AM
1

It's never going to work but I would so love to have a complete overhaul of the naming and branding of pretty much everything that could fall within the scope of feminism. I see and hear enough arguments under the banner of feminism that i want to argue but once I take a step to do so, like I said before, it's basically intangible. I have tried to make up and adapt some mock terms like "regressive political feminism", "academic feminism", "egalitarian feminism", etc. It doesn't help that you can…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:50 PM
0

The thing is that in a forum like this the language is usually pretty colloquial and when speaking about certain groups (be they political, religious, biological, or any other kind) it's implied that any assertions are made as a generalization. When it comes to Christianity there is at least some central themes actually written down that one can take a standpoint towards as well as some general sections of the religion like Protestantism or Catholicism. This can be done alongside making general …
/r/MensRights15/04/16 08:22 PM
78

"it was a good rape" Or is this not the same woman?
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:31 AM
1

Like others have said here, apology not accepted! You do not have the authority to apologize for other people just because they have similar genitals. I may sound harsh but this is something that grinds my gears a whole lot. Don't think that I don't understand where you are coming from and don't think that I don't appreciate the thought behind your words because I definitely do. The thing is that the mentality that allows us to apologize for other people who share our sex or skin color or whatev…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:34 PM
2

Is there any knowledge to what actually happens when pathological phimosis occurs later in life, say in an adult? Is it similar to balanitis? What seems so strange to me is that there are people who stretch what little skin is left to form a "new" foreskin but that such a technique can't be used to widen a tight opening. Did some quick reading up and here in Sweden circumcision is the very last resort when it comes to pathological phimosis, plastic surgery on the foreskin is preferred. It doesn'…
/r/MensRights13/04/16 05:50 AM
4

The thing is that even for phimosis a circumcision isn't needed. There is no need to remove all that tissue when a small incision would suffice. In any case this should pretty much never be needed on an infant since phimosis is the natural state of the penis during the first years of a boys life and can remain so until late teens.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:45 PM
7

A person's religious freedom only extends as far as that person's body. Their religious freedom cannot be allowed to infringe upon the freedom of another body.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:35 PM
2

Ge inte upp hoppet min vän, du klarar det nog skall du se!
/r/MensRights12/04/16 12:35 AM
2

Håller helt med dig, var bara osäker på om hon hade sånna muggar. Känns som det skulle kunna bortförklaras som irrelevant annars.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 12:28 AM
6

Swedish sources confirming that she indeed did loose her job due to her videos: Expressen (swedish evening magazine) Sveriges Radio (swedish public service) Basically the employer was a private medical clinic and the employer felt that this womans public videos could likely be seen as harassing/offensive by their patients. The hilarious part is that the fired girl felt like she was stomped at by the patriarchy for being fired by a woman for her hateful stance. One example given about some of thi…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 08:04 PM
2

Tror du inte att ditt hånande budskap mot män och små kukar i dina dikter kan förstärka de patriarkala könsnormerna om att män skall vara starka och maskulina? Har inte lyssnat på hennes dikter (och vill inte) men du kan säkert hitta något relevant om du går igenom några av dem.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 07:50 PM
10

I assure you a lot of feminists are trying to help men too. The scary part is that I believe you, but as the saying goes: The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I'm going to make the assumption, as I try to always do when someone seems understanding towards the cause of the MRM and then alludes to themselves being feminist, that you are actually interested in equality. Here's the thing, I don't ever think that feminism can directly help men, because feminism was born out of women's issu…
/r/MensRights10/04/16 01:20 AM
2

Don't forget the Sith!
/r/MensRights10/04/16 12:56 AM
2

Wow, it's only been what 30 fucking years since Erin Pizzey recieved bomb threats, death threats, and harassment for saying the same thing. This was before the internet when bomb threats, death threats, and harassment had to be more or less personally delivered and actually way more serious. All of this has been backed up by plenty of research for well over 30 years and now they bring this up? What I feel is a combination of "too little too late" and "finally".
/r/MensRights08/04/16 10:12 PM
0

Cervical cancer comes from a virus, the Human Papillom Virus or HPV as it's commonly called. The hypothesis is that the circumcised penis is not as receptive to viruses and this is because the mucous membranes are partially removed and what remains is dried out. It's also because the keratinization of the glans etc makes for a thicker barrier. As far as I'm aware there is very little actual proof of this and the only weight to the hypothesis is that some studies show a lower rate of STD transfer…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:51 PM
5

"What if we [women] had a little extra something down there?" What does she thing the clitoris is? The thing is that in many African cultures they cut the clitoris because they see it as a deformation of the female form with something that looks like a male penis. It's the same reason they cut the foreskins off boys, because its a deformation of the male form with something that looks like a vagina. I know it makes very little sense but neither does cutting genitals so...
/r/MensRights05/04/16 06:08 PM
1

Okay, so what determines when it's cultural appropriation? Is there some specific melanin level that you need to exceed in order to be allowed to have dreads? Or to enjoy anything associated with "black culture"? At what point does it become cultural appropriation? Say my grandfather was native American, is it cool for me to put feathers in my hair then? What about if if was only his grandfather who was Native American? Does it have to be in my blood? What if you have two people who are equally …
/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:57 PM
1

No she doesn't, she has the right to fuck whomever she wants, she has the right to do with without protection, she has the right to get pregnant via sex. A woman does not have the right to be catered to by the state and have the taxpayers fund her fatherless child. Being pregnant is not a right, having children is not a right, using the functions of your own body is. I think it's morally wrong for women to go out and fuck a random dude only because they want a child, I think it's morally wrong t…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:36 PM
1

It's the state actually encouraging fatherless children, how can that possibly be a good thing? You can't legislate against a woman going out and getting knocked up by Joe Shmoe or putting an ad up on craigslist or whatever. I think it's a bit shitty but it's their bodies and their choices and whatever guy they get to fuck them is and adult and should know what he's getting into. Fatherless children are a big problem and it's only going to get bigger, it's not going to be good for any sort of fu…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:21 PM
3

also legal paternal surrender being considered by the govt. Yeah this was never a thing being considered by the government, at best it was an attempt by a small group to bring the issue some coverage, at worst it was an attempt by the same group to bring themselves some coverage.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:04 AM
2

This is one of the big things I see coming from this legislation. The people who have been pushing for this but are also for equality are shooting themselves in the foot with it. Child support in Sweden really isn't that bad to begin with and this legislation is opening up the discussion for whether or not child support is actually needed at all. That along with the "acceptance" of fatherless children opens up a very real path to legal paternal surrender. However this is not really the way I wou…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 07:00 AM
1

"In divorce proceedings, moreover, the court must, in the absence of a claim, award custody of the child to one of the parents if joint custody is manifestly incompatible with the welfare of the child. Shared custody is still the base assumption, joint custody needs to be proven to be incompatible with the welfare of the child. It's in your own fucking quote. Your feminists and legislators are currently agitating to change the law to invert the burden of proof and have men thrown in jail for sil…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:50 AM
1

Sure we do have our crazies and it's easy to focus on that. But in spite of all that and in spite of the heavy feminist leanings over here I'd still say we are better off than Americans for example. We have the right to equal paternity leave for example, we have standardizes guidelines on child support based on the actual supposed costs of the child, we don't get kicked off campus for silly rape allegations, shared custody is praxis in the case of a divorce, etc. Yeah we had the leader of the fe…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:02 AM
3

So today on April 1st fathers have now become totally obsolete in Sweden.... Well not really, and I actually do think it's legal for single women in the US to also get inseminated so it may not be anything super major. Still for Sweden I definitely think this is a step back and definitely has an impact on the rights of men as well. A child supposedly has the right to at least two parents, what this new law is going to make real is a future world where children will actually grow up without any m…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:45 AM
1

So you'd judge an entire culture based on the actions of one crazy person? I surely do hope you are not American... Seriously crazy people will do crazy things, hell even normal people will do crazy things at times that really says nothing about the culture. I'd say that how the police handles a crazy case like this says more about the culture than the actual crazy person. There are way better things to bring up if you want to talk about crazy Swedish feminists than someone (who we can't even sa…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:21 AM
1

What surprises me (and at the same time doesn't surprise me) is why so many people are quick to assume that the man doesn't trust the woman because he want's a paternity test. It's not always about trusting or not it's about knowing. The mother will always know that she's the mother, for natural reasons, it's only recently that we can actually be sure of who the father is. A good illustration would be if for example someone went around and switched tags on all the babies in a maternity ward (or …
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:57 PM
5

Molestation is really not a good translation of the original word which was "ofredande". A closer translation would be offensive or harassing behavior. Also what the police said was that first of all she can't prove that the mans intention was to cause any sort of duress, and second of all even if she could the action still wouldn't constitute harassment.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:44 PM
12

No the police are not investigating this but the Swedish police is bound by law to not turn away any report that is given to them. They then decide what reports are valid enough to warrant an investigation. The woman reported the man for "offensive/harassing behavior" and the police were law bound to receive the report. However it did not take much to conclude that the actions reported, even if they could actually have been proven to be made and be made with intent, does not constitute harassmen…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 05:39 PM
4

This is one of those cases where I can agree that it's usually easier for men, in general, however it's still pretty difficult for men to get a vasectomy if they are young and have no kids. Part of the reason I think it's easier is that even if reversals are not super successful you can always extract sperm directly from the testicles and do IVF. I'm glad for her sake that she managed to get what she wanted but it doesn't seem to be a legal issue with the NHS and more an issue with her doctor no…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 03:53 AM
1

Well according to the website they say nothing about female sterilization not being available. In fact both the pages about male and female sterilization mention the same caveat that doctors are less inclined to preform the procedure if you are under 30 and have no previous children. From what I see the NHS should cover the procedure for either sex as long as they find a doctor willing to do the procedure. I'm not well versed with how healthcare works in the UK but from what I see all she needed…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 03:50 AM
3

This is nowhere near that kind of graph, first of all the graph that you linked is not just misleading it's actually wrong. Second of all there's no labeled Y-axis at all in the image. It's wrong because according to the numbers the lines should not cross. OP's graph shows a consistent Y-axis that sure it doesn't start at zero but it wouldn't make much difference if it did. The graph shows the real change in numbers over the years plus an indicator of the downward trend that has been very concis…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 03:33 AM
2

Yeah I just skimmed the article looking for sources so I didn't want to say too much about that in itself, plus some people only read the title. Anyways, yeah the whole article is pretty much all bullshit. There would be a whole lot more hullabaloo over here if such a law was even remotely close to actually be enacted.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:50 AM
31

Yeah this title entire article is not just misleading, it's plain wrong. Sweden did not pass this law, it was a suggestion for a law put forth by a local subsection of the youth division of Sweden's liberal party. The main liberal party does not even support this suggestion and even if it did they are the second lowest party in parliament right now. While I think it's a decent suggestion on the surface the ones who made it clearly stated that they did this to start a discussion. This suggestion …
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:00 AM
9

But I was told that "women and children first" was a myth and definitely not practiced in our modern society... While I'd prefer to not have it debunked this way it's still nice to have something to point towards if that shit is ever brought up again.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:23 PM
10

I actually expect this movie to be pretty egalitarian, bringing up both valid points about the MRM and valid criticisms. Given her other work she actually seems to be very good at being objective. Besides if it turns out to be a hit piece or something like that it's not like that's anything new.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:31 PM
2

Okay I'll try to argue this from their side... for fun, so this is not my own opinion here. So okay it was this persons experience that refusing to buy tampons or whatever showed misogyny. And you said that their experience is wrong plus being "pedantic" about the actual meaning of a word makes for invalidation. So basically she would experience (remember this is a hypothetical scenario and hasn't actually happened) what she feels is misogyny and you pointing out that misogyny is actual hatred o…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 12:00 PM
1

I often take a neutral approach to many issues because of that, sometimes I just point out small issues with a narrative but I try hard no never let it show that I have an actual opinion about things. I recently got talked into having snapchat... but I don't use much social media stuff so I'm not the best at knowing how stuff works. I added you though... I think. Jag hade faktiskt en fantastisk kväll, och natt, med mitt nyinköpta Twilight Princess. Somnade halv sju imorse;P
/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:55 PM
6

but the article claims that jobs which become female-dominated start to pay less due to discrimination. Always with the putting the cart before the horse in these cases. Sigh.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:06 PM
9

There is actually a legit problem with how people are treated when it comes to giving birth. In many cases both nurses and doctors can be real shitheads and do things with very little regard for their patient. The problem is that in many cases when it comes to the woman getting cut or things like that the doctors may legitimately feel the need to do certain things for the health of both mother and child. As a patient you didn't go to med school, you don't know what risks or signs the doctor sees…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:04 PM
1

Wow, thank you for your story! I'm glad to hear there are people like you out there that can do a much better job than me. I'm a tad scared of conflict even though I don't have much social life to speak of either. I suppose you could say I'm a conformist (sort of) when in social settings. I tried to bring up the fact that there are about as many male victims of domestic abuse as there are female victims once and people would look at me as if I was crazy. Since I have looked at people in a simila…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 02:50 PM
1

Were you always anti-feminist or was it something in particular that made you think that way? What's it like being a female anti-feminist in Sweden? Are you alone in your beliefs or do you have friends who share your opinions? I ask because I'm Swedish myself and I don't think I have ever met a female anti-feminist before... Come to think of it I don't think I have ever met a male one either. Do you have any issues that you care especially much about?
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:15 AM
2

I mean the fact that a lot of women's pants don't have pockets is something that has always fascinated me. At the same time I'm very uninterested in women's fashion so I rarely gain any ground on that. But to say it's sexist? Ugh...
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:51 AM
9

For anyone reading this who doesn't already have kids: *you do not have to have children! * It is a choice and should remain so! Take control of your reproduction, maintain your own condoms, if you know you don't want kids get a vasectomy, now! Don't wait around for vasalgel, if you are unsure freeze some sperm. There are a lot of women out there who don't want kids. They are generally nice people, truly independent people who actually want to take responsibility for their lives. You don't have …
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:12 AM
9

People will notice your most obvious traits the most, if all you care about and have to offer is your looks then that's all that people will notice. This is true even if you spend most of your time wishing that people didn't notice your looks. If you start presenting your personality more than your looks people will start to notice and care more about your personality than your looks. It's very simple really. The best way to present your personality is by being an agent, take full responsibility…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 11:38 AM
10

Nobody who works in HIV/AIDS research suggests that circumcision should ever be considered as a tool against the virus... I wish this were the case but sadly it's not. You could pull a scottsman on it but it won't change the fact that there are real people who work in AIDS research that honestly believe circumcision is a viable means. Not to destroy it all together but that it would still have a significant impact. I get a little bit sick to my stomach every time I hear it though.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 11:32 AM
6

there is no need to circumcise in order to prevent AIDS. Ding ding ding! This is true in Africa as well, there's no conclusive evidence just yet but there are some significant signs that circumcision may actually increase the overall risk of contracting it over there.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 11:28 AM
2

Are they intending to force women to work as hard as men You know somehow I kind of think this would be the fastest route to close the gender pay gap that everyone is talking about. Men have through history been expected to work hard and do things with themselves. Duty has been pushed onto boys all the time, they have a duty to protect and provide for their family, their country, whoever calls. Men who did not do their duty were publicly shamed and treated as lower than garbage, again all throug…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:45 AM
2

Yeah I know how they operate, I just feel the need to mention the true meaning of the words every now and then lest they be forgotten.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 05:25 PM
22

You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means. Seriously, sexism is prejudice based on biological sex, racism is prejudice based on race. Misogyny is the hatred of women, hatred as in being hateful, it's like misanthropy only specified by biological sex instead. Giving a female character a name that coincides with a slang term for women's bottoms while on the beach is not sexist. It can't possibly be sexist because sexist implies discrimination or prejudice. Hell even …
/r/MensRights11/03/16 01:09 PM
2

I suggest listening to some of Warren Farrell's stuff about parenting etc. Sure it's mostly focused on boys but there is a fair bit about both genders of children there. He talks a lot about the role that men usually fills in parenting and it can give some good insight. The biggest thing though is that she spends time with men growing up. There are things we learn from exposure that can't really be taught any other way. We observe how people talk, how they carry themselves, even the small micro-…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 01:37 AM
1

I think you need a refresher in biology my friend. Sure it's different because the one who needs the body part is actually inside of said body part but it's still required in order for the fetus to live. And with the child support law that I guess you are alluding to while a shit law it only wants your money not your body.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 01:24 AM
8

Daniel Radcliffe is rather successful on stage (from what I hear) and Emma Watson has had a few minor roles here and there. I think that accounts for a rather large portion of the discrepancy between those two. “ … call me whatever you want ... Because it doesn’t just affect me,” Damn, it's time to bust out the big thesaurus!
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:55 PM
13

Okay some may say that I'm playing mental gymnastics here but hear me out. Abortion isn't a right per se, abortion is an extension of the right to not be forced to give any part of your body for the life of another human being. I can't be forced to give blood, or a kidney, or any part of my body even if the life of another person were depending on it. This is why I don't like to compare paternal surrender to abortion because there really isn't anything to compare abortion to. We don't have the n…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:46 PM
3

I would make sure to post the sources somewhere on the bottom, doesn't have to be super huge but it should definitely be visible so people can verify the information themselves.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:37 PM
2

A marine level woman is still probably weaker than most men. Source: been in the military. That may give you some insight on the strength of a marine level woman but not so much the strength of the common man. I'm going to remain skeptic to that statement for now since from my POV it seems rather unlikely. It would also depend on what you mean, I can be stronger than her in that I can lift heavier stuff but she may be a better fighter and have much higher endurance. Still as you say, it really s…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:47 PM
1

There's also the fact that men are more susceptible to internal injuries because our internal organs are much less resilient than womens. I suppose muscle mass makes up for some of that but I'm not a doctor so I can't say.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:43 PM
8

Is this a reboot or a continuation, because the trailer made it seem like it was a continuation for me. I'm not as closely attached to the original as most people are and you know aside from the "sassy street-smart black woman" and a few moments I can't say enough from the trailer what I'd think about the movie. I'm not going to see it in theaters but I may actually see it through "other means" just out of curiosity. What bothers me about this is that not only feminists will cry misogyny but eve…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:21 PM
4

Damn that was actually a really interesting point and one that I have never heard before. Actually speaks volumes about society.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:12 PM
2

You get paid less than men! No you really don't, women in general make less than men in general. This figure is only relevant in the highly unlikely scenario where there was a contest between the group of all men versus the group of all women and the objective was to have the highest paycheck. That's not going to happen ever. You typically pay more for shampoo! No you really don't, women in general choose to buy name brand products rather than the cheaper regular ones. As a single woman you have…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:05 PM
1

Just to give some context, this is the youth section of the the liberal Swedish party, or rather the western section of the youth section of that party. The liberal party got 5.4% of the votes in the last election, they on 7th place out of the 8 parties that actually have any direct political influence. Reading this title and a previous one on reddit where it says the "Swedish youth party" I feel it paints a flawed picture of what's really going on. So these people are a subsection of a section …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:06 PM
1

I mean sure gender is a social construct but sex isn't. Sex is a biological reality and the very basis for gender, in fact for a very long time the two words were synonymous. Only recently have we had enough free time to actually disassociate the two. Because gender is derived from sex there are only two genders and they correspond with a sex. Saying that you are agendered doesn't really mean anything, if you are biologically male but don't have many common male traits you are still biologically…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:47 PM
46

I'm always amazed every time the "strength difference" comes up ad the ultimate defense for women in discussions like these. That is not something that I ever hear otherwise. If two men start fighting we don't judge them based on power levels. If one man is much weaker than the other man and the weaker one is the one who starts the fight we tell him that he's stupid for starting a fight with a bigger man. A punch is pretty normal self defense for someone being attacked, regardless of the estimat…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:31 PM
1

He is, as many have aptly described him, a provocateur. I don't always agree with things he says, and in many issues I think he's plain wrong and narrow minded. I know a lot of people like that and they can be a real hoot to hang out with but I never get to close or hang out too often. He's playing his part in this whole thing marvelously though, he brings the topic of men's issues and the folly of feminism out into the public better than anyone. For that purpose his personal views are irrelevan…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 12:25 PM
2

I always agree that a movement should be self critical and looking to the opposition is a great way to improve oneself. Some of the criticism towards the MRM is actually pretty accurate like the fact that we don't get much accomplished, especially when compared to feminism. The thing is that it's still a fairly young movement and it's just starting to gain some traction and widespread attention. Before being able to actually do things we need to be able to have our point of view not only heard b…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:10 PM
1

I was about to go into that a little but it got lost somewhere in my train of thought. A lot of things that are brought up in the MRM relates quite directly to the ease of which women can do and get away with things. And I can't in good conscience blame women for taking the chances that are available to them either, especially with the social narrative going on. That's also a part of why I think feminism has a tendency to vilify men, because once we are seen as a potential evildoer one is less l…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 10:50 PM
2

how any man "could" rape me at any moment. This is such a devious narrative because it's technically true, I mean I could grab a suitable woman off the street and rape her in an alley, I have the physical prowess to do so. I wouldn't ever do something like that though but I still could. Then again I could carry a knife and just stab people at random in a crowd, or get a gun and go nuts. So could a woman as well. The thing is that just because I can it definitely doesn't mean that I will, even if…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 08:59 PM
3

There are a multitude of other ways to combat UTI's and similar problems without amputating healthy and useful tissue. There's basically never any need to fully circumcise a penis. Girl babies suffer far more UTI's and infections than boy babies and nobody ever suggests a surgical way to alleviate those issues.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 08:24 PM
1

Every single serial killer in prison gets lover letters. All of them. Even the female ones? Genuine question actually.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:07 AM
3

Only if you are stupid enough to take your values from porn. Seriously any media that depicts humans conveys messages about sex, gender, and well okay not necessarily "modern" values but still some human values. Do you really think there's a lesson to be learned from gore films other than stay away from the lunatic with the chainsaw? The more people keep touting that porn actually teaches something the more people will believe that there's actually something to learn from porn. There's some insp…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:47 AM
3

Degrading for you maybe but not for others. But you can also look at in in another way, I have a pretty good resume for my field of work and some fairly advanced skills in a number of needed areas in said field and yet I have still been put to work in the most menial of tasks at some places of work. That felt pretty degrading too I got to say, but I had to suck it up until I could find another job that valued and put my skills to good use. Another person that didn't have my skill set was fucking…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:40 AM
6

It's called the internet, use it I used the internet once, that's when I found people who believe in a concave earth.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:02 PM
2

Okay yeah that whole having women cross the street just because you happen to be walking the same direction legitimately sucks. Declining to get into a strangers car in the middle of the night is just common fucking sense. Also from what I can tell she didn't even make any fuss about it, just kindly declined. Maybe she just didn't want to bother him, maybe she enjoyed walking, maybe she didn't like the idea of getting into a strangers car regardless of that persons sex. This guy needs to get ove…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:20 PM
2

Knob is Brittish slang for dick, the Britts say knobhead and the yanks say dickhead.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 06:24 PM
2

and just look around: 99% of taxi drivers are male. That's likely more due to personal choices than actual aptitude. But again this just shows tendencies of the group itself and has very little predictability alone over whether someone will be proficient or not.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:10 PM
15

Even if the case were that in general women wrote better code that does not suggest an inherent female superiority in coding. Just that if you gathered all male coders and all female coders and had a competition the women would be more likely to win. When people say that something is inherent to a sex you would need to prove that there's an actual physical thing that gives an advantage. Like in the case of physical strength, where men have a natural potential to build bigger stronger muscles fas…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 11:02 AM
4

First of all you are having a way too narrow view of things to be able to make even a semblance of accurate predictions. Sure feminism and the SJW mentality has been making great strides and received high visibility. However in the grand scheme of things they are both incredibly small when comparing to everything else. Population decline, or rather the decrease in amounts of children born per woman, happens when standard of living increases. In general the safest countries with the highest gener…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:53 AM
2

It's actually very simple and lies in the very root and beginning of feminism. Most feminists claim suffrage to be the birth of and the first issue dealt with by feminism. I'm sure there were women's groups before that but nothing really organized and nothing that survived for a longer period of time. At the time when this stuff was going down (the very early 1900s) the world had recently seen the industrial revolution and society was starting to adapt. Medecine had made and is making great stri…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:28 AM
2

The big problem with "yes means yes" and to some extent also "no means no" is the fact that nonverbal communication is a thing, actually it's a pretty significant and very common thing. This is partly why the whole "what were you wearing" comes up, sure it's usually some sort of a hail Mary thing but it still shows some sort of communication. That's also why people are asked about how they acted and what they did prior to the incident. The thing is that we actually do a huge part of our communic…
/r/MensRights10/02/16 09:45 AM
1

Because as it is pregnancy becomes a fundamentally unfair situation no matter how you put it. As I see it a woman right to abortion has very little to do with the fetus itself, and more to do with her body. Under the rights to bodily autonomy you are able to refuse usage of any part of your body by another, regardless if this part is vital to that persons survival. Te case of abortion is that a woman is refusing to let the fetus use her uterus and thus it is expelled. Now we know it cannot survi…
/r/MensRights09/02/16 10:26 AM
1

I'm learning and seeing there's lots of liberal women who support men's rights, Well that does give me a lot of hope for my own situation, as of right now I'm even afraid to voice my honest opinions during lighthearted discussions at uni. I have already heard many opinions that others hold and I play along quietly because I'm honestly afraid of what would happen otherwise. I mean one girl I met there, who is a lovely girl don't get me wrong intelligent and respectful and all around pretty kind. …
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:12 AM
3

What /u/Specter242 said, by allowing this we are showing that we are willing to take the high road... well high enough at least. It's not often that you get to have a discussion with proclaimed feminists without running the risk of getting banned. I see more and better discussion in this whole thread than I have seen in several days worth of posts here. The fact that feminists are actually seeking us out for discussion is a good thing and that's why I actually think it should be encouraged. We a…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:42 PM
3

A tubal can be preformed by laparoscopy, sure it's a bit more invasive than a vasectomy but still relatively quick and simple. As for recovery time usually you are clear for work within 3 days. In essence a vasectomy and a tubal are very similar, it's just that the organs operated on are located in different places. When I had my vasectomy they cut my scrotum, used a metal hook to search for and find the vas deferens, cut it with a scissor, burned it with a searing tool, then sowed each end shut…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:33 PM
11

Then black men got the vote, then women. Yes, by a matter of years, single digits. There was no such thing as public voting at first, voting was a right you earned by having lots of land and paying lots of taxes to the government, in essence you bought your right to vote. This wasn't limited to men though, while in practice there were very few women who owned enough property to be eligible to vote it was not unheard of even in the early times. Then voting rights were extended to men who were sub…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:18 PM
2

Emma was far from my first crush (that spot was cemented by Christina Ricci as Wednesday Addams, I don't know what that says about me though) but I still find her appearance very attractive and more so than just a "girl next door" kind of way too. She has a different appearance than mos other people who are hailed as the top of attractive people though, people that I don't find that attractive. J-law for example I will never understand why people find so special, I mean she isn't exactly ugly bu…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:21 PM
3

Precisely!
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:12 PM
8

Most people feel just a little bit uncomfortable announcing that they plan to be unfit caregivers. Even if you don't have kids yourself, do you really plan to let your young relatives sit in their own shit because you're too goddamned dainty to wipe an ass? I do not nor will I ever have children, my sister is infertile and does not want children, I have no real contact with any of my extended family. Also even if I did have contact with extended family, why the hell should I do that stuff and no…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:12 PM
6

Yeah that was a bit of a joke but also a point to how he handled his riches.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:34 PM
4

meaning she may lose her job because of her biology that she cannot change It's not her biology which she cannot change, it's a choice. Her biology only gives her the ability to become pregnant, while it's not 100% choice to become pregnant it is 100% choice to carry it to term. Also negotiated salary is negotiated salary, it means the company is allowed to offer whatever salary they want to people applying for jobs. I don't really agree with it and feel like there should be some standard levels…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:09 PM
7

This is because a mother is there when her child is born. This is not legal discrimination, this is simple biology. You keep jumping between wanting to talk about legal discrimination and "real life situations", well this is a real life situation right here. You previously stated that a father and mother have the same right to their child after it is born, but now you say that isn't the case. Well then the father and the mother don't have the same rights to the child after it is born. Make up yo…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:01 PM
6

There's at least one state where only the mother can drop off the kid in the first few weeks of its life, no questions asked. Actually this is true in all 50 states!
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:18 AM
-1

Oh for sure, well I had no idea she got more attention even during the filming of HP, then again I never paid much attention to stuff like that. I can kind of see why she has landed Hollywood roles because Hollywood nowadays is more about pretty coating than anything else, it used to be about a pretty outside to a talented inside but that seems to have slowly dwindled. Objectively it's hard to deny that she's a looker, I'm not attracted to her anymore though since she started this whole feminism…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 11:04 AM
1

but capital-P "Progressivism" carriers political connotations that you might want to look into before applying the label to yourself, Ah you mean the "regressive progressives".
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:51 AM
13

Where is Rupert Grint now? They had equally important characters in Harry Potter, but Emma Watson gets infinitely more attention, because she is an attractive woman. I kind of think it's also because she actively seeks attention, before this "he for she" stuff I only ever heard about Emma in the context of her being hot and on some movie premiere. Rupert has done some small scale movies but also had a contingency plan for all his money, he invested in property and an ice cream van. He didn't see…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:47 AM
8

The draft is slavery pure and simple, it's the government claiming ownership of your person, your very life. Honestly if a government can't muster up enough people to willingly agree to kill in it's name and defend it from hostile forces, why should it deserve such protection in the first place? There's always going to be people who want to be military, let them, but for the love of FSM don't force people into war.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:21 AM
17

A parent can only teach their child so much when the entire rest of the world shows the child that things are actually the opposite. I mean sooner or later he's going to realize that women are not superior beings (because they are not), when that happens there's a high likely hood that he will see women as inferior instead to compensate. That whole listen and not just hear thing is just stupid as well, whenever people say something like that it's usually because they are piss poor at communicati…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 10:06 AM
3

A silly rule but a rule nonetheless. I mean they have every right to create as perfect an echo chamber as they can and to keep it that way. I may not agree with the practice but it's their space and they get to do with it what they want.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 10:02 AM
1

Given the pervasive narrative in our society I sort of can and your description is somewhat applicable actually but possibly not for the reason you think. To go along with your analogy assume that men are the rich people, often times we downplay much of the issues that rich people can face. "they are rich so how much of an issue can X really be?" for example. For some rich people a loss can often cascade and end up loosing them a huge portion of their fortune. Sure they will still be alive and a…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:56 AM
13

Women are not allowed on the front lines... Well boo fucking hoo.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:23 PM
2

Wait... Vikings had marriage? I thought union of man to woman was more of an Abrahamic thing. I wouldn't mind reading what kind of tradition Pagan faiths and cultures had regarding those unions. Most cultures have some form of marriage within them so the idea is definitely not Abrahamic. Here is a paper that goes in to pretty great detail about Vikings and marriage. I think it's a fairly decent source even though the page itself looks like it's from the late '90s the information is properly sour…
/r/MensRights30/01/16 10:19 AM
1

feminist muslims... Hahahahaha haha he... oh what a hoot.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 10:04 AM
5

There should be a law against paying people different amounts of money for doing the same job in the same positions. Wait a minute...
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:21 PM
1

What is actual feminism? Does actual feminism believe that we live in a patriarchal society here in the western world? A patriarchal society that privileges men and oppresses women? Does actual feminism believe that the Duluth model is a good tool to use in assessing a domestic violence situation? Does actual feminism believe that the Tender Years Doctrine is a good tool in deciding what parent should get to spend time with their child? Does actual feminism believe that "he for she" is a good sl…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 10:02 AM
1

That doesn't mean all feminists take that view, and if they do, educate them rather than blame them. How? You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink. Any MR advocate that looks down on the feminist movement does so because they think the feminist movement is anti-MR. No, we do so because of what much of the feminist movement does and says is just plain wrong. I have nothing against a movement for women's rights or a movement that deals with women's issues and actually tries to h…
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:43 AM
2

Blaming people and feeling angry about it won't change what's happened and by the sounds of it OP was doing fine in that regard until he found out what he's potentially missed out on. Maybe he would benefit from talking to some sort of therapist about this. I totally agree with this, but I still think his feelings on the matter are completely understandable and natural. They may be a fair bit stronger than what we are used to see in this situation but IMO they are totally valid. That doesn't mea…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 02:21 PM
12

I am a victim, yes victim, of male genital mutilation. Honestly, admitting to this is one of the strongest things you can do in this situation. It shows that you have the ability to look truth in the eye and not run away, you truly deserve recognition for that. There sadly isn't much you can do about your physical situation, I don't know how far along foregen is and you seem to feel that restoration just isn't enough. While restoration won't bring back the nerves lost, it will bring back some of…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 10:09 AM
5

Though this tells me that you didn't find it that much of an issue until you were told it was. Well when you don't know what you lost you can't know what you should have had. Being woken up to reality like this can have a serious impact, most people just try to ignore and escape from it though. Now OP knows what was taken from him so it's quite natural to be sad and angry about it.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:44 AM
4

So let me get this straight, this woman had sex with a one year old baby (how? on second thought I don't want to know, and it doesn't matter really), she filmed it and sold the footage? So we have statutory rape/sexual abuse of an infant (a fucking infant!!!), we have creation of child pornography, and we have distribution of child pornography. How the hell isn't this woman in jail for fucking life yet?
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:35 AM
10

I can't say which came first, mental health issues or gender identity dysphoria Seriously that these two things are separated seems to play a big part in the whole issue. Now I'm very well aware that there exists actual gender dysphoria where you basically have a brain that is one gender and a body that is another. But people treat this like it's something simple, "he/she says he/she feels like a boy despite having a female body and been living a happy female life for 16 years. Well that's simpl…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 09:10 AM
1

Ah yes, the precrime division, I remember that turning out well in Minority Report. More and more dystopian future movies are becoming dangerously close to coming true.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 11:38 PM
2

Honestly I think there's a difference in fighting for women's rights and fighting to solve or do something about women's issues. It's a difference that is rarely talked about but something that I think becomes more and more relevant in today's day and age. I mean as women and men are different they can all benefit from people having their specific point of view as a central point. But even so we must never go to far as to forget that we are taking a specific point of view.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:28 PM
4

I'm circumcised and if my dick was any more sensitive I'd start falling below 60 seconds in bed. Odds are you'd actually be able to last longer, since the nerve endings removed during circumcision help regulate the "point of no return" allowing you greater control over your orgasm. It's also not just more pleasure it's actually a different level of sensitivity a different dimension if you will. Also the foreskin actually contains more than twice the amount of nerve endings of the clitoris. It's …
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:43 AM
8

Over one hundred children die in the US alone every year as a direct cause from circumcision, that's not even going into the rates of complications stemming from what's considered a "successful" circumcision. Then you have all the botched circumcisions that are preformed and need to redone later due to complications. Then there's the fact that there's very little research done on how well the anesthesia works on the child, in the cases where it's actually applied. Often times the procedure is do…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:39 AM
4

The number of pathological phimosis cases that actually require circumcision are incredibly low, I'd even go so far as to say they're nonexistent but such a claim carries a bit more weight. The vast majority of pathological phimosis cases can be remedied with a steroid cream treatment, hell a lot of them can even be fixed with daily masturbation with a specific technique. The only instance when circumcision is called for is during paraphimosis and that's only because it's an emergency. Aside fro…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:11 AM
2

VVS?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 01:05 AM
8

Circumcision of boys is legal in every country in the world, and the majority of circumcised people in Europe right now are Muslims not Jews. Given the recent increase of Muslim immigrants I expect rates of circumcision to rise drastically in pretty much all European countries. What frightens me is that due to PC culture and "religious freedom" the procedure is only going to get more legitimized as time goes on. The medical association of Sweden has called for the ban of non medical circumcision…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 11:52 AM
2

No form of birth control is 100%, the thing is that a woman can have multiple forms of birth control and a man only has condoms. The difference is that a woman can choose whether or not she'll have a baby once she's gotten pregnant, that's not something a man can. Vasectomy doesn't really count since it's sterilization, it's permanent, while you can get a reversal there is no guarantee that it will work, and they are expensive as fuck. What it all boils down to is that the woman gets to choose w…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:18 PM
5

Here's the thing, a majority of our communication is made non-verbally. The whole human mating and courtship ritual is one big consent ladder or what you'd call it. couple get along well, there's electricity in the air, guy starts being a little bit more handsy and observes the reactions of the woman. If she doesn't brush him off he proceeds and waits for a while before escalating again. By taking the risk and taking that step the guy is asking for consent, he's just doing it without speaking. I…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:28 AM
1

Yup, all my life.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 12:23 AM
1

Suppose your wife hooks up with a married man and she's so kind that she doesn't want to ruin a man's life, so even though according to paternity tests the child isn't yours, you have to convince your wife to acknowledge her infidelity. Nope, all you need to do is deny paternity and a DNA test will be done to prove or disprove genetic lineage. If you are not genetically the child's father as proven by DNA you will not be considered the father. That entire chapter in the law is spent only towards…
/r/MensRights14/01/16 12:47 PM
18

Calling her out on her verbal abuse was just "trying to manipulate her by appealing to her sense of guilt", me withdrawing and refusing to communicate was seen as me "not giving equal importance and respect to her feelings". Seriously those responses are exactly what an emotionally abusive and manipulative partner says. I know because I was in that kind of relationship and I managed to get out of it. To have responses like that in the guidelines for a domestic violence hotline is just fucked up.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 02:50 PM
1

If a child results and that child is proven to be yours then it doesn't matter what means were used in order to conceive said child, you are now responsible to pay for it.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:45 PM
4

There's not hatred towards successful women there's hatred towards most people in the upper classes unless they manage to draw more attention to something else. There is vocal displeasure to people of a higher socioeconomic class because it's considered okay to strike upwards.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:37 PM
48

Yeah, this is the thing, they don't necessarily want the actual sex but the power that comes from being highly sexually desirable. The sad part is that they are making that the only interesting thing about them so it's not really that hard to understand that once you have had sex the interest is going to dissipate. So that's even more incentive for them to actually not have sex even if part of them actually wants it.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:27 PM
3

I never liked the idea of military conscription in Sweden for many reasons but mostly because it was enforced by law. That being said, the system they did have was a fairly good one since before you are conscripted to do military training you have to do a series of tests. These tests include some sort of psych evaluation where you can basically claim your unwillingness to do military service and you won't be called in. That was the reality for a lot of people too, you also had the right to refus…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 03:16 PM
1

I don't accept the premise of your question. The premise of the question is basically how you say the world is, I would just like some examples of it. I wouldn't think my self so quick witted as to have a retort for anything you say, I'm not really a good debater in that way. Why don't we reverse your original question and why don't you tell me the things that feminists say that you think are absolute bullshit? Well there's the wage gap, which is in itself kind of a sexist notion, then there's t…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 12:28 AM
1

I think it's more an issue with being that your gender shouldn't play a role in being given the opportunity to begin with than it is about the actual choice. Okay, same question here, what opportunities are men given in todays society that women aren't?
/r/MensRights23/12/15 07:47 AM
6

It would be a complete disservice to judge this sub on this post alone, though as the votes on the post itself would prove, it really isn't something that a lot of people here agree with. Honestly, while I consider myself moderately antifeminist, you must realize that feminism itself is becoming so diluted and widespread that even the core concepts are not something that all feminists agree on. I have nothing against you calling yourself a feminist and working towards giving women the same choic…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:31 PM
5

but a business can't require dresses or makeup for women only, for instance, or bar only men from having long hair This stuff actually happens?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 02:14 PM
3

You know what, I applaud you for being able to decipher that mess, though I must wonder if that means you are here undercover or something. Jokes aside that actually managed to make some semblance of sense. If it's because you used some of the keywords from the abstract along with other words that together actually formed some sort of coherent message, or because you actually managed to decipher what the abstract was trying to say I do not know. Main issue for me was that the whole abstract read…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:28 PM
13

Oh my god, women are at the height of their childbearing capacity during the late teens early twenties, after that fertility drops and risks of negative issues with the children increase. Therefore youth is more attractive in women. Men however are fertile for much, much longer, and are sought after for their ability to care for and protect the mother and child. Thus older and more experienced men with signs of power are considered more attractive. Shaving body hair has been done throughout huma…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:03 PM
4

I remember reading that abstract and having a headache and a minor meltdown afterwards because I could not make heads or tails of what was written. To me it was words strung together that meant absolutely nothing, like the ravings of a madwoman. But I could only read the abstract though. Is it safe for my sanity to read this article?
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:24 PM
4

What it all boils down to is that women should be able to have the choice to do whatever they want while men don't. If a woman wants to be a CEO she should be able to be a CEO because reasons. How is it an illusion to believe that recruiting women en masse into the lower levels of military won't have an effect on the larger structures? With more women in the military it will be less male dominated, women will be more likely to rise in ranks because there is a greater selection of women. Having m…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:37 AM
8

Religious rights should never extend past the person utilizing them. You have the religious right to wear things, and do things to yourself, you do not have the religious right to control what others wear or what they do to themselves. This means that you don't have the religious right to alter the body of another person, even if that person is a small child. You cannot have a right that infringes upon the rights of another. Well at least that's how it should be.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 10:34 AM
1

The matrix? really? They literally upload skills into their brains and Neo was supposed to be "the one" from the beginning having more potential than any of them. The Lego Movie: Emmet doesn't surpass what'shername at most he becomes similarly skilled, but he too is "the special" meaning there is some legend or destiny thing giving him more potential. Pacific rim: did they even watch the movie? The guy is a veteran and Mako has only done simulations, she's the one who doesn't have the experience…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:44 PM
2

What's Voat like nowadays? I found myself pulled back to reddit simply because most of my "clean" interests were way more active here. Also because I like to have multiple accounts but can't be arsed to remember the names and passwords. Still I liked voat a lot and would like to spend some more time there.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 07:50 PM
5

Sorry for getting worked up, I've just been continuously bombared with idiocy for the posts I've made in here and it's getting to me. I get that, but most people here are very anti circumcision (me included) and not just because choice was taken from them but because circumcision has some really negative effects. Admittedly, you didn't directly tell me something is wrong with my cock, but it kinda goes along with what you're saying. Well yeah, I was actually trying to be a bit respectful of your…
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:22 AM
6

Dude your reading comprehension is piss poor but I guess I hit a nerve. You get to feel whatever way you want, but I'm always going to argue against the falsehood that circumcision has any advantages that can't be reached in a much better way. I'm not gonna let you stop me from loving my body and being thankful for every last part of it. When did I ever try to stop you from doing that? I'd never tell a dude there's something wrong with his cock, Yeah and I didn't, seriously man reading comprehen…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:11 PM
0

It could have been a 'blessing in disguise' so to speak? I highly doubt that actually, since he should have somewhat regular medical checkups anyway.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 08:04 PM
11

It's been a while now and I don't have links to any of this, so I may have some details wrong. Basically when the kid was born the parents had some sort of contract where the mother agreed that the boy be circumcised because the father wanted it and the mother didn't know much better. After a while she got informed and decided that circumcising her son was a violation of his rights and would ultimately harm him. Some time went by and the father took it to court. Originally a doctor examined the …
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:45 PM
2

Yes, this is an unnecessary generalization, but honestly I've found that there actually is an unacceptable amount of MRA that really do exude that vibe, and it needs to change. I kinda agree with this actually, it's easy to step into territories of hate even when when it's completely understandable. I think there's always a need to be reminded not to sink too deep in that particular hole and try to stay level headed. But can you really deny that there is a lot of porn out there that degrades wom…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:27 PM
8

I never got that thing, being "bossy" is not a good thing, it's the wrong way to be authoritative and people don't like it, that's why it's an insult. Being a leader is not something that is for everyone, it takes skill and some natural talent to be able to do it well. The thing is that if a guy tried being bossy he's either called an asshole or being beaten to a pulp.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:55 PM
12

I am glad I am circumcised Look I understand accepting your body and loving it the way it is, but that doesn't mean you have to be glad about what happened to you. There is a pretty big difference between being happy with what you have and being glad that something was taken from you. There are advantages to both No there really isn't, being circumcised gives no benefits that decent hygiene won't give you and that condoms and sexual education won't do many times better. By all means love the bod…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:48 PM
17

he wouldn't get a necessary medical circumcision. If you're talking about Chase it was not necessary or for medical reasons at all, it was because his father was a huge asshole and there was an agreement from beforehand that the mother changed her mind about. How you can legally enforce a contract that says to amputate a part of your child is beyond me though.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:38 PM
4

"If you're not a socialist when you're 20 you have no heart but if you're a socialist when you're 40 you have no brain." This is actually a pretty common saying I have seen and read numerous times before. Anyways the biggest problem I have with that is the oversimplification of terminology, but you can't really bring much nuance into a short saying like that. Personally since I spend so much time online and most I read about politics pertains to American politics while I am Swedish I decided a w…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:13 AM
1

Excuse the hyperbole but what kind of rehabilitative effect does the death penalty have? What's the point of rehabilitating someone who has been sentenced to life in prison? Punishing people for committing crimes has always been about deterring people from doing said crimes. For most people just saying that something is illegal isn't going to get them to not do it, but if you add a punishment for the action there is an incentive to not do it. It's adding an undesired consequence to actions that …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:05 AM
37

Ah yes, because if the crime is heinous enough it's no longer important who committed the crime as long as someone, anyone, gets punished. As long as the victim cries enough they will feel better by seeing another person punished, whether or not they are actually guilty is less important. For fucks sake do people not realize what they are saying? We put people in jail for committing crimes, not for the sake of the victims of said crime. Prison is punishment for an action, it's not meant to make …
/r/MensRights06/12/15 01:39 AM
3

Is this what "negging" looks like when it comes from a woman?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:13 AM
11

and I have come across a few odd spots That's quite common since a lot of things said by MRAs is often taken out of context and quote mined. Many MRAs are skeptic towards a lot of things and so we look at things from many points of view even though we may not always agree with those views they are still important to take into consideration. First of all, they say MRAs oppose marital rape laws, because the contract of marriage should include indefinite consent. No, MRAs are pretty vehemently agai…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:05 AM
4

With the constant rise of feminism and the somewhat rampant "need" to see the gender aspect in pretty much everything it's harder and harder to see people as individuals. We are both our sex and our individual selves though, this is true for all people. As a man I have a certain point of view, certain experiences, and certain reactions that a woman is not very likely to have. Even though I try to be objective I don't think it's humanly possible to be truly objective. I still try to see people as…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:56 AM
1

Someone find /u/girlwriteswhat to do a rantzerker on this fruitcake! I would actually like to see this as well!
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:36 AM
4

For anyone who can read Swedish (or knows how to set up Google translate for the page) this is a source describing the companies and organizations involved in this. Relevant quote: Gåvan kommer från Sveriges Kvinnolobby, FN-förbundet, TCO, LO, Teskedsorden, Unizon, jämställdhetsexperten Gertrud Åström och Albert Bonniers Förlag. Translated by me with added information in parenthesis: The gift comes from the Swedish women's lobby, the Swedish United Nations Association, TCO (union for white colla…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:12 AM
1

The standards are totally different. No they are not. Having non consensual sex with a porn star is just as much rape as having non consensual sex with any other person. Just because they have sex for a living doesn't change anything. Don't be stupid man. Edit: Or are you somehow assuming this was on set or something? I think the assumption here is that the sex in question happened between both of them when they were not preforming for a camera. You see when the camera stops rolling and they go …
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:23 AM
1

As to your edit, as long as you are aware of your lack of personal experience about the realities of such a relationship that's enough IMO. You have your opinion, you know that you lack some information but you still have the right to your opinion. I know that my experience is only one, and that others may well have much different experiences.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:50 PM
3

It's quite interesting because your original point is valid, given what you knew then at least. Ignorance is bliss even ignorance about abuse that has been done to you. It's easy to manipulate young people to do things that might hurt them and most people tend to just lock these things away. It's a self preservation thing. Counseling brings these things to light and forces you to face them head on and that's not pleasant. On the other hand having counseling telling you that you are a victim will…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:10 PM
6

They openly shoots horrid sex scenes with multiple people taking videos and pics every second. Well whether or not it's horrid is rather subjective but even so, what does that have to do with anything? Safewords, consent, etc. are valid for normal people, but porn stars? Again, why the hell not? I will not put porn stars at same standards as normal people. For the third time why the hell not? They are still people, they still have the right to their private lives and what they do as a profession…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:56 PM
1

I'm a swede so I know that, I experience first hand how much of a Scrooge CSN can be. Which is why I'm having a hard time they'd agree to writing off not only student loans and grants but even resetting time studied.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:46 PM
3

According to the accusation (which is in itself not very descriptive) she says she clearly told him no in several ways as well as used her safeword. It doesn't say how long it continued after that, or even if it did. So even going by the accusation itself we know very little but we do know that according to the allegation it's not about regret sex. I mean it's not unimaginable that someone would ignore the usage of a safeword for whatever reason, which in my book makes it into rape if he continu…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:06 PM
3

Wow, that's a great way to throw money in the ocean. I doubt it will ever happen though because the people who deal with student loans etc are notoriously cheap. Also it's quite simple to look at the number of people who apply to the different programs and how many are left after only a year of study. I have followed a compsci program for a few years and there are usually around 5-10 women accepted each year and around 50-60 men. After the first year there are about 0-3 women left and 25-35 men …
/r/MensRights01/12/15 06:47 PM
4

I remember reading about two people agreeing on the purpose of sex beforehand. She knew he didn't want kids so she also knew that all he ever consented to was recreative sex, so in this case where the sex turns out to be procreative it would essentially mean she raped him. Now I don't agree with that opinion because to me sex is sex, you can't agree to something with the condition that a potential outcome won't happen. To me that's just absurd. Still I have heard this opinion brandied about in q…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:15 AM
1

The thing that people don't want to talk about is that rape is a very unique crime and by its very nature it is very difficult to prove either guilt or innocence. I can very much understand that conviction rates are pretty low when it comes to rape cases in a court of law. This is not because of some problem with the law, this is not because of some bias by "the system", this is simply because of the nature of rape as a crime. Even a rape kit (to my understanding) only tests for forcible penetra…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 06:42 AM
60

Smart move on his part actually, I hope he has good lawyers to handle this kind of thing. This could potentially ruin his career and would probably fall under libel or slander or something (I'm not very good with American legal terms). Whether she's lying or not it's still going to completely tarnish at least one of them and I think that's a shame.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 03:04 PM
1

I, uh... What?
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:38 AM
2

What? Am I having a stroke or something? I read the words but they have absolutely no meaning when put together, it make literally no sense. Is the actual paper like the abstract? What the fuck is this? What the fuck is a material economy of carbon fiber? Like cost and price development or something? My head hurts.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:26 AM
135

When did this all go down? Is there more information about this? Holy hell people need to stop seeing actual crimes as some sort of propaganda thing. I don't know who this gabby is but seriously? Her saying that Stoya is lying isn't going to promote disbelieving in women who claim to be raped, actual women who lie when claiming to have been raped will do that. In no other crime will people believe the victim unless there's proof. Say someone broke into your house and stole a precious gem or some…
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:16 AM
1

Oh my god, first of all we call female fisherman a fisherman. The suffix -man here does not mean male it means human, it comes from a time and a language where a man was called a werman and a woman was called a wifman. That's why we have fireman, fisherman, postman, chairman, etc. The meaning of those worts is actually something like "person who does this or that thing". For example a fisherman, is based on the concept of fishing and attaching the suffix of -man making it "person who does fishin…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 07:13 AM
1

I agree with you to a point, I hadn't watched the whole interview when I made my comment and she still comes across as someone who has just bought the narrative. That's not something that is rare in this day and age given that it's so prevalent. The fact that media and most of feminism paints MRA's in a very bad light, along with cherrypicking examples from actual statements that really doesn't look good out of context, it's very easy to believe in. I mean she didn't know that Sargon wasn't an M…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:44 AM
2

So what she's basically saying is that she's a moderate feminist. In the most generous definition feminism should be an egalitarian movement for the equality of men and women but with a focus on issues facing women. It's just like men's rights is an egalitarian movement but with a focus on men's issues. Truth is though that a lot of feminism doesn't stand up to scrutiny when called on their words and actions. Which is why most people here don't acknowledge feminism as much else than a female sup…
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:31 AM
3

It's also a great way to actually have visual evidence instead of relying on a statement from the officer. Not necessarily because they may lie but because the statement will always be subjective and unconsciously reformed into something that didn't actually happen, or may even have missed important details.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:10 AM
1

It doesn’t make me feel scared. At all, because I recognise the internet can be a toilet for idiots who make those threats. This may well be the best statement from this woman that I found in this article. I only managed to get halfway through before I couldn't stand the authors obvious infatuation with this woman. Still I felt the need to note the positive things. I don’t fear some horrible rape person online. What I fear, actually, is the men’s-rights lobby just turning up, A load of men who f…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 10:04 AM
1

Ever thought of why that is? I have a hypothesis on the issue that this mostly has to do with the fact that men are rarely included in anything to do with children. The mans say in anything ends after conception, after that it's all about the woman, the mother. She names the father, she decides on whether or not the pregnancy will be carried to term, she has the ability to give up the child for adoption, and for better or worse she is the one considered the most important for the child. A lot of…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:29 AM
3

I partly agree but also partly don't. You seem to insinuate that a man can be a mother figure (and vice versa) and I don't really agree with that in general. I'm sure gay couples can be great parents and can bring both a masculine and feminine influence, but they can't be both mother and father figure. They can try but it won't be the same. I grew up without much presence from my father and my mother was plenty masculine but she had no idea how to prepare me for actually becoming a man. I'm talk…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 09:18 AM
3

Going by the feminist analytical method (excluding rule zero: Man bad, woman good) "man-cave" is actually sexist, but it's sexist against men. The word is applied to a place in the house that a man can call his own, a safe space if you will, a place where he can be comfortable and be himself. Calling it a cave enforces the notion and gender stereotype of men as Neanderthal brutes. It also plays a role in separating the man from the rest of the household and subsequently also the family.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:23 AM
1

So we define "objectify" a bit differently but that's okay your definition seems to be a very popular one as well and with that definition I'll happily objectify you anytime ;P what do you appreciate more? :) Well that's perhaps going a bit off the topic of this sub and more on the topic on the animal and perverted side of my nature. I can share if you want but perhaps more privately?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:17 PM
9

I keep scratching my head about that sub, it seems so paradoxical to me in a way. I mean I can sort of understand it as some sort of secular way of practicing feminism, but at the same time not really. The OP in the thread about this topic and some of the ones who replied were thankfully still pretty pissed about this outcome. It's funny how they can be baffled about it though, since whether you are feminist or not this should not be surprising in the least. Maybe I'm just naive in trying to mak…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:48 PM
1

You get that my video's more about objectification than Laci Green, right? Oh definitely! I actually never really thought about her at all (it's a good thing whenever I don't think about her) but more the general thing about the complaint that people notice boobs when they are right in their face. On that note how is it being objectifying to notice and appreciate parts of other peoples bodies? (more or a rhetorical question but feel free to answer if you want.) It's not like that closes the door…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 01:27 PM
0

While I understood the intent it took a while for me to be really sure that I actually understood it correctly. I think the message can be pretty lost on most people especially since you are new and people don't really know how you make your points. Irony and sarcasm and satire takes a while to master, but definitely keep it up. There is also the risk of being taken for someone who just wants to show off which has a tendency to make people not pay attention to what you are trying to say. I guess…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:53 AM
7

This isn't really a sentiment I fully agree with. It's more like it signals "look at me and be aroused" than actually saying "fuck me". It asks for sexual attention not necessarily sexual action.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:38 AM
5

This is something I have been wishing for for ages! Not only because I find codpieces humorous but it's one of the few ways that a lot of women could actually understand what cleavage does. Sadly it would only work if the codpiece actually became an acceptable piece of clothing, which sadly probably won't happen. Still, a man can dream.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:36 AM
5

Ah yes, the paradox of extreme libertarianism. The more freedom you give people the more they have the ability to impose on the freedom of other people. The further to the extreme you go the closer you end up to the extreme of the opposing view. Quite interesting really.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:32 AM
1

I unsubbed from videos on my main account a long time ago so I don't really know much about how things have been in that sub. What I do know from reading their rules and such makes this into a rather understandable act IMO, at least on "paper". I mean if the rule has been no politics for ages I'd say it was about time to update it with social issues as well because that has become more politics lately. It falls very much in line with the written intention of R1. I have read some comments suggest…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:27 AM
3

Well so does Hillary but she also seems to take every opportunity she can to mention the fact that she has a vagina.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:41 AM
8

Fuck that struck home really hard. I have plenty of acquaintances and get along well with people at work or at school, but I really don't have any close friends at all. I do wonder how these percentages look in other countries and how they relate to womens percentages. The article reads as if there is a big difference and while I suspect that's true I prefer data over suspicions in cases like these.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:54 PM
2

Political and active feminism has always been about women's rights, no matter what wave you are talking about. Hyperbolically you could describe the waves like this: First wave: women's right to vote Second wave: women's right to sexual freedom (or something) Third wave: women's right to whatever the fuck they want I'm sure there have been egalitarian feminists in all the waves and whatnot but feminism itself as a movement has always been about women's rights. Even a lot of dictionary definition…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:46 PM
0

It is to my understanding that most female dominated (or at least oriented) subs are moderated by feminists to a very large degree. I have been on ask women a quite a few times and seen plenty of women comment about the tendencies of that sub as well. Sure it could be puppet accounts but I'm not yet convinced of that. Your observation is pretty accurate though because there is very little room for dissenting opinion on those subs. If you are going to do something like that you need to be very su…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:31 PM
1

Just because you can is not really a good reason for why you should. Any country or company can have 50% leadership, but that doesn't mean they they will have the best people for the job.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 09:21 PM
1

I'm not sure if it's more glam rock than metal but I wonder what would happen if this woman got to hear a Steel Panther album. I can't think of a worse "community" to try this shit on actually. Don't really expect anyone to give a shit.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:29 AM
2

Another question I want to add. What issues in particular do feminists deem harmful to the fight against the patriarchy, that are in fact key issues that men have in society, and need sorting out? I think one of the biggest things is the notion of "the patriarchy" itself. Most people in the MRA don't agree with the notion that "the patriarchy" even exists in the modern western world, especially not the kind that is described by feminism. There is also the whole uncertainty of what "the patriarch…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:32 AM
2

Yeah but the arbetsgivaravgift is not nor were it ever, your money. Also you don't count the VAT to your income tax, that's completely different. I pay 29% tax, and with the jobbskatteavdrag I probably pay even less. I usually get a bit more than a month's salary in tax returns every year.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 10:18 PM
1

Yeah, I have never paid more than 29% income tax. But that's because I live in a good county with pretty low taxes. In general though income tax is at 30%. Your information seems to be about what we call marginal tax, which is a measurement of the max tax increase from a certain pay raise or something. I'm not an economist so it seems very silly to me. I'm on mobile and it won't give me the specific url but the average tax paid by someone who earns $50000 yearly is 25.2% if you are working. If y…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 10:13 PM
10

They pay over 50% taxes on average Dude where do you get your facts? We pay around 30% income tax until you make over $50 000 and then you pay 50% tax on the amount exceeding $50 000. So if you make $60 000 a year you pay 30% of $50 000 and 50% of $10 000. I'm not gonna say that Sweden isn't socialist leaning because it is, on the other hand it's not nearly as bad here as in the states. Blanket child support is around $170 a month for example, and it's not like you go to jail for not paying. The…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:57 PM
27

If there was a journalist who had radical feminist ideologies, there would be a post on /r/MensRights[1] talking about how feminist ideology is infiltrating our universities and mainstream journalism Feminist ideology has already infiltrated the universities to a large degree, I'm sure feminist speakers are not a rarity. Most people who do not agree either go to see what's being said and maybe hope for an interesting debate, possibly even to challenge their views. The others who don't agree just…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 06:25 AM
1

Thoughts on the broader feminism argument following research: • There are many arguments against the feminist movement and varying ideas about its true definition. • The widely cited ‘gender pay gap’ can’t be definitively used to support nor refute gender discrimination claims because of the lack of available data about critical social variables. • Prominent feminists in the media tend to be extreme feminists, bordering on ‘man haters’ who present a biased argument and are largely ignorant to op…
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:50 PM
3

Isn't it the case that men have narrower pelvises than women and quite often bigger thighs? I thought this along with the balls thing meant that we are not built to keep our legs parallel.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:40 AM
1

Ask her whether she wants women to get the same pay for the same job or if she just wants the aggregate salaries of all men to be equal to the aggregate salaries of all women. The statistics that point towards a gender pay gap is inherently a sexist divide. There is absolutely nothing that says that just because I'm a man I'm more likely to earn more money than a woman. That is not what the statistics say, they say that if you take any random man (who works full time) and any random woman (also …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:18 PM
5

One persons religious freedom ends where that persons body ends or where another persons body begins.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 02:10 PM
16

This is actually a real shame and pure anti intellectualism. Everyone who protested the event seemed completely blind to the nature of "uncomfortable learning". To have actual lectures from people with viewpoints that differ so greatly from yours is highly educational. If for no other reason then to learn about how they argue their case. I think the reason they gave for canceling the talk was fairly legitimate, but I still think they chickened out. I have no idea of who this woman is or any of h…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:14 PM
3

He almost said that my point wasn't even worth portraying (but he seemed to stop himself). It would have been awesome if he had actually said that though. Because then you just could have said that it's sentiments like that that are the exact reason you made the piece in the first place. Suffering is not male or female it's human. I absolutely love the idea behind your piece and I definitely encourage you to keep going. Just be aware of the fact that everyone around you are biased and maybe even…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 01:49 PM
2

Compare this to a heavy drinker deciding to stop drinking because he felt it was getting out of control or affecting his life negatively. It's a very similar scenario though I can't say how much your porn watching impacted your life, it was still significant enough to warrant a reaction from you. Porn isn't the bad thing here it's a persons relationship to it. As with any relationship question I have to ask, have you told her about how you feel about this? It may bring the house down but it's be…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:45 PM
15

Seriously enough with the yes means yes shit. I can get behind the whole idea about "no means no" which is actually an empowering message. I mean why can't we teach people that in circumstances like these it's okay to say no if they don't want to do whatever it is. Teach people to own themselves and their actions and take responsibility for the consequences, foreseen or not. That's another thing I've thought about. I mean people say that rape is pretty much the worst thing that can happen to you…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:39 PM
3

Not really an activist but he has done some great videos and is pretty meticulous with his research when debunking things. I recommend TL;DR. If you like Karens content then maybe Honeybadger radio is to your liking? Beware though, most of the videos are looooong. I recently started listening to some of Vernaculis videos as well and they seem pretty interesting. Perhaps you'd like some of Sargon of akkad's videos as well. That's all I got at the top of my head.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 09:09 PM
2

I thought "bro" was used to describe a close friend in the beginning and since then evolved into a simple term of endearment and/or sort of a synonym for man (as in "hey man, what you up to?"). I'd also say that it may actually have come from media portrayals of "black culture" where people call each other "brother" or "brotha" as a sign of friendship or endearment or just reference to themselves. It's just some observations of my own though, I definitely have heard the term bro to be used by an…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:53 PM
6

But finally I submit. This is why it's not rape IMO. Was it really shitty, disrespectful, selfish, mean, etc on her part? Most definitely. Do you have every right to feel used, disrespected, mistreated, etc ? Absolutely. I would suggest you take some time for yourself and stay away from her for a while. I also suggest you tell her why, that you felt disrespected, used, mistreated, and you need to work that out yourself for a while. Tell her that her crying is not helping you, it's not making you…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 03:03 PM
1

It's not male privilege, it's not abuse, it's just a guy being a bit of a selfish douche for a moment. This is assuming the washing machine was broken and needed replacing of course. Same thing with the truck in the OP, it's not abuse or male privilege, just a guy buying something that he wants instead of what may actually be needed.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 02:44 PM
5

The only way one can look at the current "wage gap" and see it as problematic is if you already have an incredibly sexist outlook on life to begin with. Let me explain. The way things are now men and women make the same amount for the same work in the same workplace, if they don't this goes against laws that have been in place for many decades now. The "wage gap" appears when you start looking at the whole thing as a competition between men and women, and the problematic part is when you don't l…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 11:28 PM
1

Hahahahaha!
/r/MensRights08/10/15 11:16 PM
1

To be honest I'm still having trouble fully believing that she was serious but given some things I know about other radfem groups in Sweden it seeps to be serious. Besides all evidence is pointing in that direction, aside from the ridiculousness of the claim itself. She was also certain that terminal workers would gather after hours and sacrifice women and children. I think she may be clinically insane.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:53 PM
3

The radfems in Sweden however are some of the most extreme. Demanding that men sit down while peeing? WTF? I'm not really sure if you are joking or not here. Yeah we do have some really crazy crazies (here is a good documentary about it but it's pretty long so be warned) but these are actual crazies. Personally I haven't heard much more demand for men to sit while they pee than what I hear from other countries. Isn't this a common trope complaint from women everywhere? Also on sitting down (poss…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 12:15 PM
1

Who?
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:37 AM
8

Interesting article, shes still struggling a little with some sticky remnants of the feminism she left, and she's clearly somewhat SJW in her thinking. But she has taken a step in the right direction and started to open her eyes, something that is really hopeful. She seems to have understood quite a few of the issues that men face, and is probably open to more of them, but she still felt the need to use "misogynists" as people to empathize with. I kinda understand what she was going for but it's…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:37 AM
5

The media in Sweden is pretty much all left wing/green party/feminist people. An explanation for this is that pretty much everyone who gets into media studied it in high school and kept going, and most who chose to study it in high school had those political views. Those who don't are pretty actively shunned and bullied out of there. All that happens unofficially of course, "everyone is entitled to their opinion" is what they say but not really what they do. Anyways this means that 95% of those …
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:21 AM
4

It's an interesting observation, I have found that a fairly prevalent thought by a lot of women is that them simply being there is enough. That male sexual pleasure is as simple as "touch the penis and he feels good, touch it more and he feels better". I have always disliked this notion that seems to be rather prevalent even among men. Rarely are men ever encouraged to surrender to pleasure, we must always be aware and in control of ourselves. It's starting to change with the fact that a lot of …
/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:05 AM
7

As much as I like to shit on a lot of American policies and stuff done there (mostly in jest to show disagreement) they are pretty much the only country who got it right when it came to free speech. A man or woman should have the right to express any opinion they want without facing legal repercussions. Social and personal repercussions are another thing and to be expected (unless they are illegal). Ultimately people are responsible for what they do, and you can't renounce that responsibility by…
/r/MensRights08/10/15 09:48 AM
9

What's the reference?
/r/MensRights06/10/15 06:56 PM
1

I can agree with you partly that on it's own it's not a really convincing argument, but I wouldn't say that it's completely bad either. The thing is that the procedure hasn't really changed at all, and if it were to start today with the original purpose I'm pretty sure there would be an outrage. Your second objection isn't really applicable here either, I actually didn't know that the autobahn was built to facilitate invasion but that doesn't matter. A more correct comparison to your example the…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 12:19 PM
1

By all means include it, I just wanted to mention an argument that I find myself using against the prevalent feminist usage of "institutional" and "systemic" in their arguments. Cultural biases affect individual people, sure they do so on a large scale but it's still individual people. Unless it's written into law or policy I can't really see it as institutional or systemic. Sentencing is up to the judge, and if many judges are influenced by cultural biases then we have a problem in the system, …
/r/MensRights06/10/15 12:03 PM
5

Excerpt from: Moses Maimonides, The Guide for the Perplexed, translated by >Shlomo Pines. (University of Chicago, 1963) Originally written ca. 1190. Part III, Chapter 49, Page 609: Similarly with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for it is, in my opinion, the wish to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible. It has been thought that circumcision perfects wha…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:17 AM
1

I think something important to keep in mind is to be able to clearly prove that something is systematic. For that to be the case you need to be able to reasonably prove intention and it needs to be in policy or "writing". Take for example the massive amounts of measures taken to help women in education when they have been outperforming men for years. There's also the fact that men are vastly more likely to be the victim of violent crime and assault while there are plenty of measures taken to end…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:03 AM
15

No because we'll make a new internet, with blackjack and hookers.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 09:52 AM
1

Yeah but the issue I have isn't the potential for mistakes and complications with the procedure. I mean the point of the procedure is to damage the penis, talking about complications in that case just seems strange to me.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 06:20 PM
4

Yeah it was a bit baity and you should have gone with a phrasing like "infant genital mutilation", or "cutting into the genitals of infants" being legal here in the "west". I also think most people are aware here about what happens when you bring up a comparison between MGM and FGM anywhere on mainstream reddit. Often even bringing up MGM as mutilation will spur a shitstorm. Around here though most pro circ comments are heavily downvoted and debunked so I think it's safe to say that most people …
/r/MensRights03/10/15 06:16 PM
1

An article about being called a feminazi by an actual feminazi named Charlotte Proudman ... Proudman Oh man you really can't make this shit up, I can go to bed happy now.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:36 PM
5

not to be allowed [emphasis added] unless practised by a person with the requisite training and skill We have this in Sweden, this has led to every hospital having to provide the service to religious parents. They have a religious figure present while the surgeon does the cutting or they have a surgically trained religious figure do the cutting. You may as well say that they are actually enforcing the procedure. I like the facts that you have emphasized and I'm in a bit of a pessimist mood today…
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:27 PM
10

Dude you made a mention that gender politics should be put on hold in a sub that lives and breathes gender politics. You may as well have told the person to hold their breath for an entire day. Look I totally agree with you, and banning you (while commonplace for a sub like feminism) was totally not an appropriate response, you still gotta know your audience.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:20 PM
12

When he brings up the hygiene issue you could tell him that it can take up to several weeks for the wound to heal. During this time he will have a painful wound on his penis at the same time this wound will be in contact with urine and fecal matter from his diapers. How is that possibly more hygienic? I also want to mention that since you have chosen to keep him intact (for the time being) you need to make sure that no one forcibly retracts his foreskin. It's attached to the glans with the same …
/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:27 AM
1

Do you want an increase in vigilante justice? Because this is how you get an increase in vigilante justice.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 10:21 AM
3

It has blessed the world with some of the most attractive women in the world & it does push women towards more attractive standards. This is a blatant positive for straight men. There's caveats in there but in general that is positive for men. I don't agree with this one bit, what the fashion industry has done is merely create a cultural ideal of beauty. In the 1600s the ideal was to be as pale as possible for both women and men for example. I don't remember what time period it was but at some t…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 10:11 AM
14

Okay, I don't know what the actual video was about but as a photographer I can say a few things about the arguments used here. This is what bothers me to no end with what could be endearingly phrased "feminist logic". The person you are arguing with obviously doesn't know anything about photography and even less about film development and how it works. First of all photography is the "capturing of light" on a medium that can represent it. In the early days painters would use a Camera Obscura to …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:32 PM
4

I kind of think that was the joke.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:20 AM
9

why feminism is flawed today (as opposed to pre-suffrage times) First of all feminism didn't really exist at that time, what existed then were women's rights groups who all had varying degrees of radicalism and politics. They existed alongside human rights groups who also had different politics but were generally more focused on getting more rights towards all people. Now at the time a womens rights group was understandable but the concept was still flawed, and the fact that none or very few of …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:05 AM
1

I think this is true to an extent, but that polite and simple requests should be entertained for the sake of courtesy and everyone rubbing along better, though the correlating point is that polite refusals should also be respected. Yeah, that was sort of what I was trying to say, just not as well phrased, heh. I'm rarely one to turn down a polite and simple request, but sometimes I find the request a bit too silly I will politely decline. Personally I have pretty much always accepted the demogra…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:36 PM
1

1 Thanks To Feminism, Women Can Vote Nope, feminism may have been active when women got "the vote" but it's not because of feminism that it happened. Having "regular" people vote is actually a pretty new concept. Mostly voting was done by those who had a specific amount of land or fortune. This is because they actually invested in how society was run. You could almost say that votes were bought. Votes were also limited to households, which meant that the head of the household was usually the one…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:18 AM
3

This is an area I'm actually quite interested in but it's hard to have a discussion about it because people usually either care too much about it (meaning you have to walk on eggshells when discussing) or not at all. For a long time I felt that trans people had to be the most sexist of all people because all they ever talked about were the actual gender roles and stereotypical parts of relating gender to physical sex. Then I learned that there are some people who actually have "female" brains in…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 09:23 AM
1

For fucks sake, two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:12 AM
8

Here is what I don't get, how come the school can find this man guilty of sexual assault and not report him to the police? Don't the school have an obligation to report any criminal activity going on? Why not leave this to the people who are supposed to take care of it?
/r/MensRights16/09/15 10:56 AM
2

Why do murders happen? Why does theft happen? Extortion? Gang violence? Regular violence? In the most basic sense it boils down to a disagreement about morals. Most people who do bad things think themselves justified in their actions others simply don't care. The latter group are what we call psychopaths and sociopaths and possibly sadists. I don't think their motivations need explaining. The first group is a little more interesting but before we go into that we need to look at the crimes themse…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 08:46 AM
1

The issue of abortion has always been the fact that both parties have equal rights to the potential future child. The other side is that the woman should be allowed to do with her body what she wants, meaning she doesn't want to be an incubator. The issue of sterilization is entirely a personal issue, it doesn't matter if you are married or not the other party has no legal right to any say in what you do with your body. Personally I think it's common decency to let your partner in on your desire…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:55 AM
1

No, if a woman is in a relationship the doctor will often require to know that her partner is on board with the procedure as well, meaning to meet them both. There is no universal praxis on sterilization surgery though so it will be different depending on the hospital and even depending on the doctor you see. But make no mistake women get just as sour a deal as men when going in for a sterilization, this is not exclusively a mens rights issue. Because a female sterilization is usually more invas…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:47 AM
6

This is something I don't understand really, nobody considers it an attack on women when we say they were mutilated regardless of what kind of FGM was preformed. Calling MGM for what it is though, apparently is an attack on cut men. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 01:58 PM
4

While I agree with what is actually being said here, I don't think it's that beneficial to go out with a statement like "we should pay women less". I mean that's a golden opportunity for quote mining. In general we do pay the gender groups an equal amount for equal work and I think that's where the focus should remain.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:04 PM
9

Aren't Luchadors like 50% about over the top appearance in one way or the other as well?
/r/MensRights01/09/15 04:54 PM
6

Oh for fucks sake! Belonging to an arbitrary category of people that happens to be widely represented in a field is not fucking privilege. Wasn't this kind of rhetoric called hateful when the arbitrary group happened to be Jews? People get to where they are at through hard work, making good connections, a pinch of luck, and even more hard work. None of these things are privilege.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 09:47 AM
3

Wikipedia: Sexism or gender discrimination is prejudice or discrimination based on a person's sex or gender. Merriam Webster online dictionary: prejudice or discrimination based on sex behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex Oxfrord online dictionary : Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex. While looking up these definitions I found a feminist blog that stated that the reason why feminism doesn't r…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 03:26 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:34 PM
4

I absolutely agree, that the foreskin is very sensitive, but that might not necessarily translate into more pleasure. This is true, but I mean at the very least it holds the capacity to feel more pleasure, or a different level of pleasure. It still is hard to describe. While there is certainly risk involved with any medical procedure, I would argue the the benefits outweigh the risk. The world Health Organization promote circumcision as a way to help prevent the spread of HIV and other STD's. Th…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:32 PM
6

Fuck I fucking hate firefox, I had written a good and long response to you and the browser crashed... ugh, I'll try to rewrite as much as I remember but my heart just won't be as much in it this time, I hope you understand. I believe you when you say that you see it as the least important issue, and I partly understand you believing that as well. I don't agree with you for a second, but I do understand. I'll try to make my case here and it's up to you what you want to do with it. Can you elabora…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:25 PM
2

Man, I really want codpieces to become fashionable again, that would give women like her a taste of her own medicine.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:24 PM
11

The fact that you and a lot of people think so is I think a pretty good reflection about how society in general view mens issues. The fact that people shrug and consider it a non issue what we do to baby boys penises is a really apt visualization of how men are considered expendable and not worthy of sympathy or empathy. The issue is not about those men who don't have an issue with being circumcised, it's about the thousands upon thousands of men who suffer from it. It's also about the more than…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:21 PM
1

No I'm genuinely baffled by the fact that you first stated that the "genitals of a man swells and creates body pain" and then you seem to claim that we are not talking about erections or even penises. Then what the hell are we talking about? I mean if I talk about the male genitals that swell what else could I be talking about but the penis? I'm genuinely trying to get some clarity here. Besides, telling me to "open a textbook" over and over again isn't going to help either of us.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:45 PM
-1

So what's it called when the penis swells? Because that's what I was told was called an erection.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:56 AM
3

The fuck is she on about? It's a legitimate question.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:56 AM
1

Clarity is always a good thing in discussions yes.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:54 AM
3

I agree, and I suspect the percentage is not based on accusations that led to court (as in real court, not campus court) but on accusations in general. I'm really interested in reading the book and finding out in more detail how he supports that claim.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:51 AM
3

The genitals of a man swells and creates body pain to get him to blow his load. If you experience physical pain from having erections I suggest seeing a doctor because that's not really a good sign.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:45 AM
3

Yeah, I assume the same so I gave a clarifying and elaborating answer. Ejaculation is needed to maintain the function of the male reproductive system, but masturbation is not necessary for ejaculation, the body handles that automatically.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:42 AM
2

Do you seriously think preventing a teenage boy from masturbating will have no adverse effects? I never said anything about keeping men from masturbating, I'm pretty sure I even suggested that masturbation is a good thing. Also I'm talking need as in survival, when you say physical need that's what I infer from it. Other things are mental/psychological needs that may involve a physical component. We need food to stay alive, we do not need for that food to be tasty to stay alive. Ejaculation is a…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:38 AM
2

Look, if women can't speak for the experiences of men then the opposite applies as well. We can debate what constitutes a psychological need for ages but sexual release is not a physical need. Our physical needs are air, water, and food (and to some extent sunlight). Controlling our urges (whether they are sexual in nature or not) is not torture, it's something that is done by every social animal out there, humans included. With our society growing more complex and civilized we have employed mor…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:25 AM
4

The host's response: "Can you be a troll without trollish intent? Geeezuz. Of course you can't, the same question can be asked by a troll or a normal person what makes it trolling is the intent behind it which usually becomes clear when the commenter replies again. In this case apparently the host doesn't realize that she/he (I didn't watch the video, slow connection) is actually the troll.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:33 PM
2

The makeup complaint is usually about people saying that they look tired when they choose to not wear makeup one day. Apparently they don't really understand that it's a genuine concern showed by people who care and don't really think that much about what makeup does. If they continued to not wear makeup and just focus on taking care of themselves people would stop noticing in just a few days.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:54 AM
15

Three boys are dead, and they are dead because they were boys. How is this not an issue for men and boys?
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:47 AM
3

The capacity for evil is a human trait (maybe not solely human but human nonetheless), I'd say she may well have some sort of mental issues but she's still human. The moment we start dehumanizing things we don't like we remove the ability to find a solution to those problems. Parents kill their children, it may not be very common but it does happen all over the world. Denying the humanity of those who do such things is essentially trying to hide the issue in order to get a false sense of securit…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:45 AM
10

I have nothing against women in the military, but I do think that all people in the military should be held to the same standards regardless of their sex.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:17 AM
3

Is this even legally viable? I mean I know about doctor patient confidentiality and I can actually agree that the mother is the patient here and not the fetus. So yeah the doctor has no obligation to tell the father anything, but it should be illegal for the doctor to lie. In this case assuming the two are married I'd say that (since I don't know the legality issues I'm going to go by how I think it should be) unless the mother expresses a desire to not tell he husband anything the doctor should…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:03 AM
10

No that's grounds for a lawsuit to break her wallet before she ends up in jail.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:52 AM
2

Here! Don't be discouraged by the 1998 feel of the website, it's not hard to navigate and the information is accurate. It's just that the site is ugly as hell.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 06:46 AM
2

Wot? I realize that not everyone experience the same things and my experiences could be fairly unique but where are these groups where men are touching, kissing, and having sex with each other and it's apparently a frequent thing? Assuming this actually happens sometimes (it's a common trope in closed societies of rich people) I expect a lot of these people actually being closet gay. I remember doing some sexual experimentation with a close friend once or twice, but neither of us really liked it…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 02:51 PM
1

The circumcised penis yes, or rather the number of free nerve endings in the entire glans. Here is a decent source
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:27 PM
12

Yeah, I don't know what he wrote about the business he was going to start but going by the message on the shirts alone I'd say the only one that could be nitpicked (and sadly it would) is the last one. I fully agree with what you are saying though, I support anti-feminism mainly because I think that the core precepts are flawed and that they should reconsider their position. I try to be "against" as little as possible and focus more on being "for" things as that gives a more positive message. Al…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:19 PM
4

I'm late to this but I'm going to respond anyway. Ethics and morals are pretty much shaped by culture, something that is common practice and the people around you don't think is especially wrong will most likely result in you feeling the same way. This is due partially to ignorance of the other sides of the issue on a cultural level. You don't think it's that big of a deal because a lot of people where you are from don't think it's a big of a deal or at least don't speak about it like it was. Th…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 02:13 PM
4

pleasing to my lovers and saving me a lifetime of extra work to maintain hygiene. Dude, do you even realize what you are saying? You don't want to maintain you hygiene but you want to please your partners? Fucking take a shower! It's not that difficult and it should be a daily occurrence at least, and it takes like what five minutes tops for a quick but thorough one. Basic hygiene is not fucking difficult and something that's considered rather attractive by most people. Maybe your neurotic issue…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:32 PM
3

Just in case you end up in this kind of discussion again there are a few other points you can try to bring up. Like the 20 000 plus nerve endings that exist in the foreskin (more than twice the amount found in the clitoris), or that the head of the penis is one of the least sensitive parts. Instead of talking about the prevalence of the procedure focus on legality. Any kind of injury done to any part of the female sexual organ is considered FGM and thus illegal in the majority of the world, whil…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:18 AM
11

Bulgaria?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:53 PM
7

because of that choice I made in infancy. I suspect you are making a sarcastic remark here but I feel the need to emphasize that this was neither your choice or your fault. How do you even forgive your parents? This I cannot even begin to answer actually. Some may find ignorance to be enough of a reason to extend forgiveness. I mean we do a lot of things because we think it's for the best or that we don't realize the extent to which they can be harmful.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:46 PM
7

After learning a little about how health care works in the US I can actually kind of understand their claim. Especially with all the stuff happening around planned parenthood and the anti abortion movements that are very much alive. Where I'm from all of that stuff is taken care of basically for free (there is a basic charge for a doctors visit, and sometimes a little extra for surgery or other procedures but that's minimal), everything from regular check ups and pap smears to abortions. It's al…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:38 PM
2

I think that what you are thinking about are those examples of runway models that people use as a scare tactic about the industry. When it comes to runway models they basically want a walking coat hanger in those instances. But this isn't the case most of the time, sure they are required to be slim, but that's not really something difficult to do. They spend considerably less effort than any elite level athlete on their bodies. Still this is just one small part of modeling, you have other models…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 09:22 AM
2

Couldn't they have gotten Warren Farrel to that position instead? Seems to me that would have been infinitely better.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 09:43 AM
15

From the very beginning feminism has been built on falsehoods and misrepresentations. The crazies in each wave have simply been a natural progression of these falsehoods adapted into the core of feminism. This meant that the falsehoods were basically untouchable without collapsing the entire movement. During the suffragette movement voting was not a right, it was a privilege and a responsibility. You had to fulfill certain criteria in order to be allowed to vote. Voting was also restricted to ho…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 09:08 AM
11

A veteran of 30 to 40 porn films, Pffft! Isn't that what you'd call a greenhorn? “I wanted to make porn that represented my daily sex life,” she says. I mean sure, to each their own but why the hell would you limit yourself to that? Any movie about a persons daily life is bound to be fucking boring unless they actually have a really interesting daily life, and most of us don't. I mean if it represents your daily sex life why not just have the sex you have? Also we already have this genre, it's c…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:19 PM
1

I remember Karen (girlwriteswhat) having talked about this on multiple occasions, but I don't remember what videos sadly.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 03:12 PM
1

Sure, women can set the thermostat to whatever they fucking want as long as men are fully reimbursed for buying shirts like these.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 08:47 AM
6

This is the patriarchy in action, a woman will be seen as a victim regardless of how she personally feels about the issue. The fact that a mans opinions on something that happened will be respected and not a womans is male privilege and female oppression. /S
/r/MensRights09/08/15 08:28 AM
11

He fails to mention that women were not barred from voting, voting was based on what property you owned. And women weren't exactly barred from owning property either it was just very rare because it was usually passed down father to son or son in law or to some partner. There is evidence of women voting really far back in history to prove this. Sure you can argue that it was bad that women were essentially kept from owning property etc even though it was no law against it, but these were differe…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 08:23 AM
1

The foreskin contains more than half the nerve endings in the entire penis, that's why it reduces sensitivity. The head of the penis is extremely sensitive to pain which is why the skin hardens there on the circumcised penises.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:27 AM
1

Pleasure is subjective and can't really be measured, when you look at populations of women who have been circumcised they'll generally respond in pretty much the same way as men who have been circumcised. There are plenty of them who still have very satisfying sex and are fully capable of orgasm, then you have the people who don't and say nothing about it, and then you have the people who don't but speak up about it. Here is a great video talking about what happens when the foreskin is amputated…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:25 AM
4

From what I see the MRM is highly supportive of gay and bi rights even though the focus is as mentioned in the name, mens rights. Whether these men be straight, gay, bi, trans, black, white, brown, green, yellow, or whatever, it doesn't make that much of a difference. Sure there are not very strict rules on being PC so opinions and arguments may sound harsh and not have the most polished language all the time. Still I see very little hatred only non PC wording.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:21 AM
4

From what I understand you come from a more "womens rights" direction when it comes to feminism, and that's totally understandable. You get to shoulder any label you choose and that's up to you, but I hope you understand the monolith that is feminism. I'm talking the duluth model on DV, I'm talking angry protesters on CAFE seminars, I'm talking the death threats and outright hatred of Christina Hoff Sommers, I'm talking about the real crazies like those participating in #killallmen etc, I'm talk…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:14 AM
7

But there is nothing stopping women from being a head of state, or a head of a company, or a head of a family. There is nothing in the modern "western" world that says that men have to be the heads of the family or that ha man has to be the boss or leader. There is a general tendency for men to take those roles but this is largely because of history and general pack mentality. This means that if a majority of men have a certain characteristic and behavior other men are going to be more inclined …
/r/MensRights06/08/15 11:56 PM
3

It's a first step though I find it overly simplified which makes it sound pandering towards ideas I don't really agree with. Still it's a first step and I'll go with the assumption that you mean well with this. Mentioning how girls should be protected by boys and more or less pandered to by boys and then saying they should destroy the myth of women being inferior. Perhaps I'm reading more into the phrasing than intended but having the role of protector usually puts one above the ones protected. …
/r/MensRights06/08/15 07:03 PM
3

I checked it out a bit and I actually hope it grows a fair bit. Looking through some topics I find a lot of SJW cookiness but that kind of comes with the territory of being feminist friendly. Still they do touch on some interesting subjects and if they keep going they are bound to end up disagreeing with much of feminism or maybe even disproving a lot of it. Sure they may end up being pushed down and silenced by big mom feminism but I don't think much will be lost because of it. It's way to much…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:52 AM
9

Infant/child circumcision is a big one for me and it's kinda coupled with the overall issue of how male sexuality is perceived and treated, though that's not so much a rights issue as a social issue. The fact that the information about the functions and attributes of the foreskin exists but so few people know about it is deeply disturbing to me. If people knew about that I think many would look a whole lot differently on the whole thing. The fact of the matter is that the foreskin is functionall…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:37 PM
4

I was? Meh, people being butthurt I guess. I expect there to be plenty of people hanging around here only to downvote.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 02:19 PM
5

Well, coming from a culture that doesn't cut it first of all isn't even a question that comes up that often here. There is research done on the topic though that confidently says a majority of women prefer intact men. It's quite obvious to me that preference is based mostly on culture. Since it's mostly a question of visual aesthetics and the fact that in America the foreskin is often said to be something dirty and full of "bacteria and shit" it's not hard to understand the preference for cut di…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:34 PM
19

Individual women yes, some of them do face and go through some really fucked up shit but it's not true for the group, not specifically and not entirely. What many SJWs are doing is placing emotional impact on events that happens to women while removing emotional impact of events that you happen to men.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:13 PM
13

So I don't know anything really about this sport but if there are both men and women who fight in the "Bantamweight" class (?) and they don't fight each other isn't it misleading to remove the gender prefix? Seriously the reason why there are womens leagues and championships and stuff is because those things are exclusive to women. I seriously doubt any organization would open up the [big container] of worms that is mixed gender fights.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:32 AM
113

It was meant to be leading and pandering to the social narrative of the wage gap and "women are oppressed everywhere" thing.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:25 AM
4

I think it's more about men thinking nothing will come of it other than at best humiliating laughter. Why report it to the police if you will just be turned away?
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:22 AM
9

as far as I'm concerned my penis has "always" been this way. You do realize that statement is directly related to this: As a result I get the circumcised penis i prefer Right? Now here is the thing, you like your dick and I understand that hell I applaud it, I wish everyone could like their dick. But you like your dick the way it is because that's the only way you have known your dick to be. The reason it should not be done on babies but on consenting adults is that you can't ever be sure of how…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:19 AM
1

I'd try and contact the HoneyBadgerBrigade since they are doing a similar thing, and hear if they know any people interested in doing something more. Personally I think it's high time we had some more reasonable and civil voices about the topic of MRA. Don't get me wrong I do like the bashing dealt out by Sargon and the likes but it all tends to get a bit antagonistic in nature. I actually like listening to the ramblings of the honeybadgers but it's always nice to have more stuff, maybe somethin…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 08:08 AM
5

Emma Watson wants men to be included in feminism but only to the point of them doing the dirty work. I mean in her speech she acknowledged some ways in which men suffer and she said how she didn't like this. And then in pretty much the next breath she turns to these men who suffer and tells them that they should do "their part" for women. I don't want to think that it's intentional but she's a smart woman, it shouldn't be hard for her to figure out what she's actually saying. She seems, like so …
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:07 PM
2

Yes it's definitely mutilation, by the very definition of the word too.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:42 PM
5

Anatomically maybe but not in terms of functionality. The foreskin contains up to more than three times more nerve endings than the glans clitoris. These are highly specialized nerve endings whose sole purpose is to sense touch and temperature. The foreskin in its entirety protects the glans penis which only has "free nerve endings", they only sense pain and deep pressure. It also aids penetration during intercourse making it easier to enter the vagina. It also keeps the glans lubricated as well…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:11 PM
22

The savings system was designed for men. These kinds of assertions are starting to seriously piss me off. The savings system may have been designed by men but is was designed for people who save money regardless of gender or race or whatever. It's the same with pretty much all other things where people claim that just because men designed something it was designed specifically for men. Unless we are talking about urinals or something that just isn't true. Things that men have created and designe…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:48 AM
3

I remember there being something like this here one or two years ago. It tagged members of SRS and some other sub I think. Just thought it merited a mention.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:35 PM
1

Is this a reference I'm missing?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:50 PM
1

It'd be fun to say I'm a black man with a black cape but alas like Darth Vader, I'm but a white dude in black. (The name was supposed to be a reference to FFVII when you are chasing the "black caped man" AKA Sephiroth)
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:29 PM
16

because you're a girl and we need more of those!" Whenever someone mentions that thing about "there needs to be more women in [some field]" I usually curiously ask them why. Not in an obnoxious three year old way but in a genuinely inquisitive way. Usually stops people in their track until they say something about diversity or something. Then I simply ask what does gender diversity have to do with [said field], and that's usually when they change the subject. The trick is to sound (and actually …
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:53 AM
1

Yeah, given her being a physical fighter it would make more sense for her legs and arms to be bigger. Then again I remember Cloud having ridiculously tiny arms in the official artwork too. I agree the change on Rikku was ridiculous too, I mean she was naturally of a tiny body type to begin with.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 04:05 PM
1

I don't know what measured you have taken in being more healthy but /r/keto is a pretty good place and they get some pretty serious results both weight wise and health wise. Worth checking out at least.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:44 PM
1

I knew she wrote under pseudonym (from a honey badger show) but I had no idea it was erotica. Kinda curious about that now.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 02:47 PM
1

I may not always agree with the reason for why there always is a "what does this have to do with mens rights?" comment but I actually like that it is. I think that this is a question we should always and constantly ask ourselves and discussing it could actually bring us to conclusions we have yet to discover. In this way we can actually start to think even more about how different things actually affect mens issues.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 08:22 PM
8

Wait I thought big strong muscular guys with chiseled abs and pecs and glutes and any other muscle group was just a male power fantasy and that women didn't find that sexy right? I mean clearly Magic Mike is also just a male power fantasy with all these women swooning over the guys, because it was written by men right? /S
/r/MensRights24/07/15 08:14 PM
2

I mean this is quite common, maybe because I live in Sweden I hear this more but I do hear it a lot: "propagating gender stereotypes is bad!" Seriously I hear this from mean and women and die hard feminists who are ashamed that they like something stereotypically associated with their gender. This comes from their whole desire to "smash the patriarchy" because how can you smash it if even one thing you do perpetuates it? It's totally crazy and I try to laugh rather than cry whenever I come acros…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:00 AM
2

It should be noted that my son has a licensed therapist (as I stated, I'm his strongest advocate). Why? I mean he's 15 months right? Admittedly I don't know much about the developmental stages of kids but that's like barely old enough to form coherent sentences right? Why would he need a therapist? He is classified as having a difficult or spirited temperament. He has slight social developmental delays that are being evaluated by a group of specialists. He's 15 months old, he has a huge amount o…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 09:48 AM
1

I dunno, the Swedish feminist party is actually doing pretty well and may actually get a seat come next election. This despite the fact that they want to pretty much completely open the borders (I'm not even joking about this they want no cap or legislation on immigration), a school system controlled by political ideology, and specific reeducation of boys and men. That's just some of the shit they claim to be for, though you have to actually read it to find that out. Personally I'm a bit conflic…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:57 PM
3

How often do you see a post on TwoX about a relationship issue which invited a cascade of "dump him and move on" style posts? I don't go to TwoX but that kind of response to posts regarding relationship issues is quite universal throughout reddit regardless of the genders involved.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:44 PM
1

It may not be so much of a gender issue as it is just different kids learning by their own means. Yup, that right there is the answer! It's true that boys in general learn differently than girls in general, but there are more factors at play here than just sex. The job of a teacher is to manage a class of students and try to help them learn. Something that interestingly enough is really absent in any school system (to my knowledge at least) are actual classes on study techniques and their useful…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:39 PM
1

Sexism is prejudice based on someones sex (also possibly gender), racism is prejudice based on someones race. This is the definition of the words in the language which we use, if someone doesn't like it they can make their own language (with blackjack and hookers) but they can't expect anyone to understand them. Any negative connotations or expansions on definitions are highly subjective and may well be used colloquially but there is really no place for that when it comes to discussion. The whol…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:29 PM
1

I'm generally against gender segregation especially in school which is a place where we learn not only knowledge but also how to socialize with other people. Part of this is learning how to work together with people of other genders because once you are out in the "real world" that is going to be required of you. I would like to have, maybe not entire classes but singular lectures here and there to be gender segregated though. This is to give students the experience and learn the difference. Per…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:11 PM
1

This has been the policy in Sweden for ages, and from what I know it has been heavily criticised as to not really giving any results. If they want to end "forced" prostitution it's best done via legalizing and regulating "ordinary" prostitution and actually going after the trafficking pimps. It's also interesting to note that male prostitution is far from uncommon. In fact in Sweden, the majority of people under 25 who sell their bodies are men.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:33 AM
1

I suggest you buy her a dictionary and put a bookmark on the page containing the definition of sexism and racism. I also suggest you highlight the important area of text to be certain that she notices it.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 12:15 AM
1

I have watched a few of his (their?) videos and from an entertainment standpoint they can be pretty fun. "Here is a concept that sounds outrageous when you hear it, let's use varying degrees of mental gymnastics and cherry picking of information to convince you that it's actually true" That's pretty much the formula of it all, and yes it's sometimes entertaining but hardly ever factual. After a while it becomes really tiring to listen to. It also often sounds suspiciously much as if they actuall…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:14 AM
1

While I don't think sex with 17 year olds should be illegal (European here, age of consent is 15 unless you are a teacher/doctor/guardian/etc), it's still the law and she's definitely old enough to know the law. Don't like the law? Do something about it or move to Europe. If I go to a country I follow their rules even if I don't like them. Seriously it's not that hard to not have sex with someone if they are underage.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:19 PM
6

I think you misunderstand, they want "rights" for women and power (economic, political, and social) for women, they never said anything about wanting any responsibilities that usually come with those things. This is how it has always been, feminism see the power placed in the hands of men but they don't see the responsibilities that come with that. They also don't see that the responsibility is often there even when the power is not. This is the same reason why feminists only push for more women…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:54 PM
3

Some people just can't take any social cues or they simply don't care. Yes this happens with some men trying to talk to women, it also happens with some women trying to talk to men. It also happens with women talking to women and men talking to men. I have run in to acquaintances who just won't shut up and that can't even take the clearest of polite hints. I say hint but I mean politely stating that you don't have time and you need to leave. I have run into strangers doing the same. But this is …
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:19 PM
6

A legal guardian can't be there for a medical event that could quite possibly cost his charge its life, damage it for life, etc.? No, parent's are not allowed in the operating room during a surgery (not always at least) for example, especially if the risk of the procedure is high. They are confined to the waiting room and are allowed visitation to the patient afterwards at the discretion of the doctors. In this case it's even more so due to the fact that there is another patient in the same room…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:13 PM
1

Opinions on subjects are not limited to those who have personally lived through said struggles. If that were true pretty much no one would be allowed to talk about slavery anymore, no poor people would be allowed to utter a word about how rich people have it, etc. The fact is that if you have lived through hardships you are more likely to be biased and subjective when looking at related issues and less likely to take an objective approach to a solution or even understanding the problem. So he ma…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:58 PM
12

No, I can see how you might think that but it's still the woman who pushes the baby out. You as a father have every right to be at the hospital, you have every right to be told that a baby is coming and you have every right to see the baby after it has been born and had it's health checks. The mother is still a patient at the hospital and as such has every right to refuse anyone who is not medical staff to see her. Witnessing the birth of your child is not a right, in fact the medical staff can …
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:40 PM
1

I'm late but I'll give this a shot. When did it become a "only a girl problem" in every situation? Possibly when political feminism started to gain recognition or even since it's very birth. It depends on how you want to view it. Many people and pretty much all feminists love to lean on the fact that feminism was apparently responsible for giving women the vote. It's considered the first "women's issue" and also the first one to be solved. However it was never a "women's issue" it was always a "…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 08:22 PM
3

I mean shouldn't it be enough that both he and his wife have stated clearly that it was a joke. It was even a pretty funny joke too IMO. It was relevant to the subject of the conference, contained a bit of truth that people don't always think about, and some hyperbole for comedic effect. From what I know it's quite common to start a speech with a joke in order to get everyone's attention. Geez.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 10:37 PM
3

Yeah let's have a penis and vulva/vagina on the signs instead, that couldn't possibly go wrong.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:36 AM
7

Silly man, male infant (or child) circumcision is not maltreatment or abuse, it doesn't even harm the boy. /sarcasm How the fuck is male infant circumcision not relevant to that discussion? Fuck.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:01 AM
2

I think that kind of phrase has been misused from the very beginning. It should be used to explain behavior not to excuse it. It's just the same as "he/she is just a child" or "they don't know any better", it's an explanation for behavior not a justification.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:28 AM
1

Well what pisses me off is that "Educate young people on what constitutes as rape" is not what people are saying, they are saying "teach men not to rape". I can agree though that people should teach what constitutes as rape because then they would have to face the fact that they don't really know where to draw the line anymore. At what exact point does a person become a rapist? Should all rapes be seen as equally bad? Why isn't there a push on women to make sure they seek consent from their part…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:21 AM
2

Smaller patriarchal social structures do exist (in different ways around the world) but to agree that our "western" society is inherently patriarchal I would need an official and complete redefinition of the word. Patriarchy much like feminism has pretty much lost all meaning since it has been overused and warped to become something of an abstract concept. Nowadays it's mostly used as a catch all term for anything deemed bad but nobody who uses it can really agree on what it actually means.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 01:47 AM
4

Okay so I did a little closer research and found that the peak times are always in November and April. This means that after these peaks interest goes down to the lowest points that are in January and July. I have no idea about what political events that occur in the US and especially not at what times so I don't know if any of those play a role. I would just like to mention that July and November are precisely after both international womens day and the pink ribbon campaigns. Two major events t…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:58 AM
3

My thinking was that it would peak around the time of those events for women since feminism would be more relevant then. I don't think feminism would be as relevant during summer or winter, especially winter since there is all the holidays surrounding Christmas and new years. People have other things on their minds during those times. It's nothing more than speculation on my part though, the regularity of the searches is making me really curious.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:41 AM
3

I tried to think about that too, it apparently spikes twice a year, seemingly at the same times of the year as well. If I were to venture a guess I'd say it relates to international womens day and possibly the breast cancer campaign in October.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:23 AM
12

We already teach men not to rape, rape is a crime and has been for pretty much the entirety of civilized society. Rape has always been connected with bad people like thieves and murderers. Yes it happens still, yes people tend to justify their actions, you'll find the same happens for theft and murder and other kinds of physical violence as well. When we teach kids the basic ideas of moral and ethics and how to behave in our society, rape is a part of that. "Don't do illegal things" has been tau…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:16 AM
15

Seriously all kids should be taught basic falling techniques, balance, and posture/stance in PE. Stuff like that will be beneficial for everyone, and also some basic self defense is also beneficial. Kicking guys in the balls is not defense that is offense, getting out of holds and blocking/evading punches is defense. Seriously, learning proper techniques on breaking a fall has probably saved my life at least once and seriously decreased injury at several other times.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:33 PM
36

see Norwegian documentary "Brainwash" for details Here are the all the parts of the documentary "Brainwash" (Hjernevask) going through the different topics of: Gender equality paradox The parental effect Gay/Straight Violence Sex Race Nature vs nurture The whole series is definitely worth a watch and they are all subtitled in English. Edit: Changed pretty much the entire comment adding links to each individual part of the series.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 05:12 PM
1

Not that I don't believe you, but do you have a source for this? It would be awesome to have for future debates.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 03:52 AM
7

Pfft, didn't you know that irony is a tool of the patriarchy, like logical reasoning and being open minded. /S
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:28 PM
3

Thank you for that video and all the informative links I will save all of this for future use. It's great to have some academic knowledge of how the foreskin works to show others who don't know this.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 11:21 PM
0

Should we take their word for it? Actually I think we should and I truly believe that they do enjoy sex "just fine". The thing is that enjoying sex "just fine" is not really a good reason for excising the most sensitive parts of ones genitals. If you don't know what you had you don't know what you lost, is true but it does not justify loosing anything in the first place. Enjoying sex is highly subjective, actually sensing physical stimuli is not. That circumcision removes much of the ability to …
/r/MensRights19/06/15 11:01 PM
6

Lol and you are in the medical field? Holy shit you should get a refund from your education. Yes there remains some mucosa after circumcision but a majority of it is removed and what remains dries out and goes through keratinization. Meaning it is no longer mucosa but "regular" skin. The vagina does not go numb from removing the external clitoris. There are numerous examples of women who have even gone through the most damaging form of FGM and they are still capable of achieving orgasm on a regu…
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:33 PM
8

The mucous membrane stretches from the tip of the inside of the foreskin all the way up to the glans. When the foreskin is removed (including the majority of the mucosa) what remains of the mucous membrane will dry out and keratinize effectively rendering it devoid of any function.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:12 PM
2

The entire movie industry is pretty much all about objectification. We don't really care about the "real" personalities of the people we watch on screen, in fact the entire point of being a good actor is to convince us that they are someone else. When the movie is over we don't care much about what happened to the characters, we already got our fix. It may be emotional from something like the notebook (insert vomit here), it may be an adrenaline rush from and action movie, it may be a different …
/r/MensRights19/06/15 07:06 PM
4

The inside of the foreskin is also a mucous membrane that keeps things moist which also works as lubrication.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:28 PM
8

Please do correct me if my logic is off. It's not your logic that is off it's your facts. Male circumcision is removing skin not mucosa/actually important nerve clusters like in a female. The foreskin most definitely contains both mucosa and important nerves. The inside of the foreskin is pretty much one big mucous membrane that exists to keep the glans moist and clean. On the foreskin is also the highest concentration of what is known as Meissner's corpuscles (or tactile corpuscles). These are …
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:20 PM
6

Can confirm, also even with smaller bollocks and medium sized thighs it's still pretty uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:16 AM
16

Rape is as far as I know a pretty unique crime in that consent is the only thing separating it from being either something wonderful or something terrible. When reporting any crime there needs to be some kind of evidence that a crime actually took place for things to proceed or even be taken seriously. I mean if you contact the police and say you want to report a murder you are bound to be asked questions like where it took place, who was involved, how it happened etc. Same with theft, assault, …
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:20 PM
2

Procedure wise they are pretty much right on the money though. Slight discomfort for 15-20 minutes and about a week of steadily declining soreness. That's it really. There is a risk of complications but it's really really small and also diminishes with better procedures. This of course doesn't mean that anyone has the right to force you into the procedure. It is, after all, considered permanent.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 12:34 AM
14

Lets not forget the 50 Shades series either. (Though I would certainly love to)
/r/MensRights16/06/15 06:27 PM
2

In other news: the sky is blue, water is transparent, and repeatedly hitting your head against the wall will start to hurt.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 12:01 AM
1

can a father block an abortion if the mother changes her mind? No, because during pregnancy the mothers body acts as sort of an incubator and a life support system while the embryo grows. Abortion is about the womans choice to not have her body go through that. Sort of like no one can force you to donate any part of your body even if it is to save a life.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 06:38 PM
8

but then he pretty much goes on to make the exact same case for true equality that anti-feminists actually make. "I may agree with you on the points you make and I may agree with your goal, but that does not mean I'm willing to bear the mantle of your ideology". I don't like being anti stuff because it leaves a bad taste in my mouth, I prefer being pro things instead. I don't agree with, well pretty much anything feminism says aside from the fact that there are societal issues in the world. I'm …
/r/MensRights13/06/15 02:34 PM
5

Put this case in contrast with what happened to Chase and his mother... What the fuck is going on in the world? I see kids ending up with mother who abuse them, and when the father does win custody he is the abusive one. There is a lot of talk about "thinking about what's best for the children" maybe it's time people stopped talking and actually did just that? Children are not property, nor should they be treated as such. Instead of looking to the rights of the parents they should look at the ri…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 03:50 AM
8

Do any of these academic feminists ever supply a definition of what they mean by patriarchy? It seems to always be some sort of abstract concept to which every bad thing in the world is attributed, and also it has to do with men somehow.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 06:07 AM
3

You mention that studies show a lot of benefits to MGM but you never even get close to what these benefits are. But let me tell you this, there is absolutely no medical reason for circumcision aside from severe deformity, the procedure is purely cosmetic. There is no medical benefit that circumcision could possibly give that can't be attained with condoms or warm water. Now let me just tell you a little about the foreskin. It is an organ whose function is (aside from protecting the glans) purely…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:14 PM
4

I have no idea but I think they had a cleanup of comments so most likely the preceding comments about MGM were removed for derailing. I have seen plenty of things like that all over reddit where the mods messages make no sense because everything else is removed.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 11:59 AM
8

They could make a post about the foreskin and why it's awesome for women. Then again I try to stay away from that sub.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:39 AM
75

To be fair the rules on that sub are pretty clear when it comes to derailing. I don't agree with the reasoning behind such a policy but it's their sub to do with what they want. Mad props for calling it what it is though.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:26 AM
1

It's good for you!
/r/MensRights08/06/15 07:19 PM
2

It's late, you are probably asleep but I hope you come back and see this. You seem to have gotten a few different kinds of comments here, some harsher than others but I hope the overall experience was somewhat positive and educational. I'm a strong opponent of infant circumcision, (I'm not to fond of adult circumcision either but I recognize that I have no say in that matter) and while I'm intact myself (Swede), for some reason the issue is close to my heart. I have seen countless debates on the…
/r/MensRights02/06/15 11:16 PM
2

the birth rate has all ready been falling for years Try decades. Globally it started falling sometime after the '60s and has continued ever since.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 10:20 PM
-1

I was also overweight for most of my adolescence and couldn't even get a date until I lost most of my weight. Upsetting as this no doubt was at the time, this has sweet FA to do with MRAs. You're thinking of the Red Pill, possibly PUAs, probably not MGTOW. ... Suffer in silence from what? From being overweight and not being able to get a girlfriend? That's not really a men's rights or even a human rights issue. There is the right to a family life in the UN charter, I believe, but that means the …
/r/MensRights02/06/15 10:09 PM
5

This is part of why I really dislike those who say that people have feminism to thank for women having jobs etc. No! People have the industrial revolution to thank for that, they have the advances in medical science to thank for that, they have WWII to thank for that. Well the last one is just the push that basically forced women out into the work force. We see it still today, in the "developing nations", when they get working medical care and access to machine equipment women have fewer kids an…
/r/MensRights02/06/15 09:38 PM
40

I don’t think we can provide a single, unified service that everybody would feel comfortable with all the time, at the same time.” What, like being open for all people and just making sure everyone has a respectable tone? I wouldn't be surprised if one day soon men will have to sit at the back of the bus.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:36 PM
3

If you are unsure of how a comment is formatted you can also press the button marked "source" under the comment. It will show you how the comment was written.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 10:56 AM
6

!3th century Rabbi Moses Maimonides wrote: “As regards circumcision, I think that one of its objects is to limit sexual intercourse, and to weaken the organ of generation as far as possible, and thus cause man to be moderate. Some people believe that circumcision is to remove a defect in man’s formation, but every one can easily reply: How can products of nature be deficient so as to require external completion, especially as the use of the foreskin to that organ is evident. This commandment has…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:41 PM
1

His overriding point is that it is what women want. Which is actually demonstrably false. A majority of women who have been with both circumcised and intact penises prefer intact penises.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:31 AM
6

And hygiene was not a human concern until about the 16th century (or later), when germs were theorized. In the Christian western world at least. Regular bathing and hygiene has been a staple in many eastern cultures for a very long time. Even the vikings were known for their propensity to clean themselves and keep their hair combed and washed. And there is a text written by a highly respected Jewish scholar during the 11'th (or 10'th) century about how the benefits of circumcision is that it mak…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:28 AM
4

Wow, that is some serious production quality right there. How ironic though that the statuette is a golden (white) male in all his glory.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:15 AM
13

You know people always seem to hate when you make a comparison with nazi Germany but stuff like this is making it hard to avoid. Early on there was big propaganda by the Nazi party about how good all the Jews had it, how they had all the best jobs and all of the money and even much of the political power. This sort of thing started fairly innocently with stuff that was actually true albeit a fair bit cherry picked to prove a point. After a while things escalated, the privileged Jew was okay to r…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:10 AM
5

The patient has every right to decide who gets to see them or not (aside from hospital staff and law enforcement), especially if they are exposed or in duress. The patient is the mother here so I don't see how you can't see the link between the premise and the conclusion. Let's take a truly ridiculous scenario but still one as close as we can come to the actual situation. Say I swallow something that belongs to you, say it's of really high value as well. You have no right to be with me when this…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:39 AM
5

I actually loved that in Pacific Rim! (Spoilers ahead!!!) The whole movie they just teased a romantic relationship between Mako and (oddly enough I don't remember his name), but in the end nothing happened. I always felt like that final scene was a real solidification on a true platonic relationship between a man and a woman. It was fun to see.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:29 AM
5

Yes! She is the one in labor, she is the one giving birth, she is the one in the hospital bed and so has every right to decide who gets to be present. The father should have every right to see his child after the birth however.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:16 AM
9

Dammit I am in Europe and can't really do anything about this but write to magazines and news outlets and medical organizations hoping to get an official statement. This is a case where the kid can actually speak for itself, it's no longer a caste of the child being too young to express opinion as it is with infants. This is pure and obvious child abuse! There is no reason to force this surgery on a child.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 11:00 AM
15

From what I have read even the kid doesn't want it done. The incredible thing here is that first of all a contract about the forced bodymod surgery of an underage child is even considered valid. Second of all the state is actually enforcing this against the wishes of one of the parents. The fact that there was a contract shouldn't even factor in the equation. Could you just sign a contract about anything when the child is born and then have to abide by that 5-10 years afterwards? Maybe even long…
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:45 AM
2

Thank you for a link to a great article, really, it took me a while but I read it all and I think I may have a few extra arguments in my arsenal now. The only shame is the website on which it's hosted where there seem to be numerous anti vaccination articles as well. I'm really bothered by the fact that I know many people see me the same as anti-vaccers and I know exactly how I see people who are against vaccinations. It's sad, frustrating and annoying, but what can one really do.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:12 AM
3

To be fair it's not so much the doctor as the hospital itself that sees these profits, or well, whoever is in charge of the hospital. Though I'm sure it can work itself into the doctors paycheck somehow as well, just not exclusively.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:45 AM
2

Science has shown that men who are circumcised lose 40-60% of sensitivity. See this depends a little on the wording and what you mean, I remember reading that the foreskin effectively contains about 40-60% of all the nerve endings. So it would be reasonable to assume what you say is true. The sad part is that there is no conclusive science to say that. There are extremely few studies done on penile sensitivity in the first place. The most quoted one here was done in 200X sometime (I don't rememb…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 07:41 AM
1

and the constant hunger, fatigue, and discipline required that may result can be too much for many people. If you feel constant hunger and fattigue when you are trying to loose weight you are doing it wrong. Most people seem to think they need to loose all the weight and fast. They don't realize that the best way to make it last is to go slow. It also means spending some time and figuring out what food works best for you. If you want to loose weight and still eat well you have to pay attention t…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 10:02 PM
10

... when I have to eat garbage fucking Kale so I can feel attractive I don't understand this at all really, sometimes I wonder if all the girls who starve themselves so they can be "thin and pretty" just do it to get attention. Do they work out? do they exercise? did they spend more than two minutes thinking about how you actually get and stay in shape? It's not fucking rocket science to get in shape and staying fit. If you need to have a diet consisting purely of Kale (which is pretty nutritiou…
/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:35 PM
2

I also think her first metaphor would have been more persuasive if she'd suggested a parent cutting off a child's earlobe, or some other appendage that isn't widely understood. I always found a good comparison to be the pulling out of a nail. The kind of binding tissue that holds your nails to your fingers is the same kind that binds the foreskin to the glans on baby boys. During circumcision on infants this bond needs to be broken in order to cut off the foreskin.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 10:46 AM
1

Wasn't there something about how Davinci (or some other famous painter) didn't actually do a lot of the paintings he was accredited for rather it was apprentices who made them and he slapped his signature on them. I remember hearing something like this was common for many "master artists". I kinda think it's a global truth that those in a higher position will take credit for the work of their underlings.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 08:06 PM
2

To be fair it can be an art, that's why there's a profession called make up artists. Then again they do it as a profession or serious hobby not as an everyday thing. Some women are seriously skilled at this, many of them are not even close to being in the same league.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 07:54 PM
1

First of all anything that person said is simply anecdotal and secondly is that person also a mind reader? How can they possibly know what other people are thinking? Casual conversation, if you are going to dissect it, is an incredibly complex mix of body language, tone of voice, intonation, word choice, intention, instinct, etc. All of these things also vary from person to person even if they are trying to convey the same thing. They also vary greatly depending on the setting of the conversatio…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:45 PM
1

Wow! this was just really hard to follow and neither of them made any good arguments. The few things that actually had merit were mentioned in such a way that it lost it's "weight" I also don't really see how he got started on Beyonce of all people, felt a whole lot like baiting to me.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:31 PM
17

Power + Privilege man, it's all about the power + privilege. Seriously I'm actually starting to become afraid that this shit is going to find it's way into the dictionary soon.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:09 PM
12

"Just you wait until your father gets home!"
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:43 PM
8

Yup, the embryos are equal parts his genetic material and her genetic material, so any action to be taken with them must be agreed upon by both parties. That's how it should be at least.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 06:21 PM
1

but I'd rather you advocate for equal rights of all genders and call yourselves Egalitarians or Equalists, There already exists an egalitarian movement, though to be honest I haven't really checked it out. From what I gather the MRA is trying to be what feminism is said to have been but for men instead, but with some added awareness of "complete" equality. Also it's still a young movement, I hope that it grows up well and manages to usher the world towards egalitarianism. In the end the gender o…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:14 AM
64

Wow! I didn't think I would read it all but it was just so entertaining. She is a terrible leader and boss who expected to not need to act like one by hiring only women. Man if she had put up hidden cameras everywhere in the office and sold the contents she would have made fucking bank. I actually kinda want to see that show. She just constantly let her employees do what they wanted and they proceeded to walk all over her. There were never any repercussions to them being late, not doing their wo…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 07:33 AM
7

It's an argument against female superiority, not for male superiority. There is a quite clear difference.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 07:21 AM
9

I think it's cultural in a sense that it largely applies to female culture. Not all women are like that but I have seen what goes on in enough large groups of women to deny such a thing exists. It only takes a few individuals to start something and then everybody has to take sides. Then there's gossip, talking behind others backs, silent treatment, fucking up others work, making really inappropriate remarks to intentionally hurt someone else, all that jazz.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 06:57 AM
2

Try working on your kegels, it can greatly improve your sexlife regardless of whether you're circumcised or not. At the very least it can't hurt. I have been reading that MGM is not always accurate, that some may lose sensitivity more than others and that it can come down to the doctors method at removing the foreskin. This is partially true, some circumcisions remove the frenulum along with the foreskin and some don't. The frenulum is the most sensitive part of the foreskin so if it's left ther…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:39 AM
1

I rewatched a few episodes of the original show a while ago and I can't say in good conscience that it's even near as good as I remember it, but as a kid I loved it. Though pokémon was always number one (until the first two seasons of Digimon which had more depth in the story). We didn't get speed racer over here though, so I've never seen it.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:04 PM
5

The "interesting" thing about aids spread in "the western world" is that the vast, vast majority of new cases are found in needle drug addicts or homosexual men. A clarification on that last point should be "men who regularly engage in unprotected anal sex with other men" which is of course not exclusive nor limited to homosexual men. That's the group you should compare between if you were testing for efficacy in the "western world". Even so, the fact that we Europeans are not all dying of AIDS,…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:12 AM
3

I find it really interesting because even when manga and anime are heavy on the fanservice that's still only appearances. The women and girls portrayed are still fucking badasses with their own personalities. Sure many can be considered tropes but even then they tend to be more than that. I mean it's funny but I don't know a single guy my age who didn't watch Sailor Moon as a kid. And while maybe not all of them got too engrossed in the story most of them really liked the show for more than it b…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 07:13 AM
2

And depending on how you interpret "ask" it could mean any kind of non verbal communication as well, like for example starting to feel your partner up. In many cases even in relationships sex escalates from the ground up with lots of different kinds of non-verbal things. Every one of them could be construed as "asking" and both parties always have the ability to say no.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 11:42 AM
1

Stretching and steroid creams are the way to go, give it time and take it slow. Also try to find other doctors and see what other solutions there are. Here is the kicker though, circumcision is not necessary at all, if manual stretching and creams doesn't work (which I fail to see why it wouldn't since people use stretching to restore circumcised foreskins) they can make a small lateral incision on the foreskin to widen the opening. nothing is removed, no function is impeded, and as long as the …
/r/MensRights26/04/15 09:58 AM
1

Arguing against the suffix "-ist", he continues, "you can't be born an –ist. It's not natural". Whedon explains that because of this, the word "includes the idea that believing men and women to be equal ... is not a natural state. That we don't emerge assuming that everybody in the human race is a human. That the idea of equality is just an idea that's imposed on us..." First of all, way to exercise the mental gymnastics there, second of all of course we are not born with ideologies and specific…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:14 PM
1

There appear to be quite big variations as to the definition of MGTOW and also towards the reasoning behind why someone identifies as such. Some have just opted out of romantic personal relationships with women and some have gone full on refusing to talk or acknowledge them at all. Some are even full on actual misogynists. People who have been through traumatic experiences or even just overly problematic ones with women in general I can understand. People who are not entirely socially savvy (lik…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:46 PM
3

I'm really starting to wonder what the use is anymore. I feel like I have read the same arguments from both sides a million times before. All the same things get rehashed over and over again. There's the motte and bailey argument of the dictionary definition of feminism. The stats and stories about women being treated badly (which does happen but is not really the point). The attributing all the "positive change" over the years to feminism and not regular social evolution. The "feminism did grea…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:17 PM
3

but I am violently against any criminalization of parental decisions and any government or other interference in parents' right to choose for their children. So you are against the criminalization of female circumcision? Having you nails pulled out / having your foreskin cut off, neither of these mention how the procedure is done. My point about the nails is that the only reason people find male circumcision acceptable is because of tradition. Nails can be argued to be useless, they need care an…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 05:40 PM
16

However much we may disapprove of how other people raise their children (many decisions they make affect the world far more than circumcision/FGM) we may not take away their right to choose for their children except possibly in the most extreme circumstances (leading to death). Ah yes, fathers teaching their daughters how to suck cock, Mothers teaching their sons to eat pussy. Being struck with a belt or a sock full of pennies only builds character right? How dare people interfere with how peopl…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:13 PM
4

But they wouldn't be sentient would they? I mean if you were to make a sex bot you'd probably make them with a preprogrammed personality (or several that you could choose from).
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:36 PM
9

Would you like this one or this one?
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:38 PM
1

but... but... all evil comes from the patriarchy and feminism wants to kill the patriarchy and when they do all racism, sexism, against all people will be gone! /S
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:18 PM
2

I can only speculate and hypothesize but here goes. First of all lesbianism isn't all that common visibly in any kind of media (porn doesn't count here) or even outside. While homosexual men have been appearing a bit of everywhere and something we actually have some contact with. Most men's encounters with lesbianism comes from porn or is just "girls having fun" things. Because of this the concept isn't as cemented and a simple first reaction is to not really grasp the concept fully. Everything …
/r/MensRights21/03/15 01:10 AM
1

Yeah, while there hasn't been too much of a deep storyline in the mario franchise he has mostly been saving the princess for the sake of the mushroom kingdom and not to get her in bed. Much like Link, Mario (and Luigi) have had the main goal of stopping Bowser from taking control and getting the princess back to her ruling position.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:49 AM
4

But that's also why you rescue Zelda right? I haven't played the recent games but I never really saw link rescuing Zelda because of romance or sex (well if we exclude the fact that women are viewed as more valuable for simply being women) but because of her political importance. Besides rescuing Zelda was always more of a subplot to the whole stopping Ganon from ending/ruling the world.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:30 AM
6

A lot of the issues brought up by feminism can actually be seen as legitimate issues. I'm wrestling a bit with this right now since I have come into close contact with a some of these issues lately. The problem arises when feminism decides to: Inflate the issue, making it much bigger and worse than it is. Blame everything on men/the patriarchy and general conspiracy nuttiness. taking the wrong steps to fix the issue and actually making it worse. I mean there is nothing that's really actively kee…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:22 AM
14

I think this is very similar to the whole "why do dogs lick their balls? because they can" bit. I mean if you look somewhat good and have even the slightest exhibitionist streak in you it's a fucking gold mine. If I could get that kind of cash for showing my body online I'd be a veteran by now. I understand your point, and I feel it's a really really bad move to infringe on other spaces while doing this thing though. These women are the real contributors to the bad rep that women have in gaming …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 08:56 AM
3

Yeah my entire sex life completely changed once I started to pay more attention to my actual pleasure. I still believe that sex is a full on give and take between both parties and stuff like that. However I never felt comfortable to actually allow myself to really feel the pleasure I felt. I also received generally positive reactions from my partners by doing this.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:23 PM
1

I think you will never really get a good answer to that question because a trans person (at least to my knowledge) is a trans person and not a cis (yeah yeah I know, but it's a useful word) person. What I mean is that they were born into the wrong body and have spent a substantial amount of time like that. No amount of surgery and hormone treatment will ever change that reality and the fact that it's different from what a cis person experiences. Our point of view is greatly influenced by our cir…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:10 PM
4

Can we just start teaching kids to own their fucking shit and take responsibility for their choices in general. Even when they are drunk.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:50 PM
11

As an intact male from Europe (Sweden) circumcision seemed naturally barbaric to me because ow! However it wasn't until I heard about the actual functions and details about the foreskin that I learned to appreciate it. In school we were taught that it's just a piece of skin, and that is still thrown around and I kinda understand why too. I mean I was taught that it was just a piece of skin, I don't remember when it separated from my glans or any of that stuff. Masturbation amounted to jacking of…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:24 PM
4

If I remember correctly this was the first ever scientific study on the sensitivity on different parts of the penis, and one of the few sensitivity studies ever done on the penis at all. I always remind myself of that whenever I hear people complaining about there not being enough research into women's sexual pleasure.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:58 PM
2

You are quite welcome. Glad I could contribute.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:45 AM
1

I actually suggest you going the sort of passive aggressive route and simply ignore her from now on. If she ever asks why you could simply tell her that you are "sparing her from interacting with a filthy pig" and then go about your business. I would like to add that to make this more effective never shy away from interacting with her when it's necessary. This will either make her feel bad and rethink some things, or save you from interacting with a toxic bigot. Those kind of interactions rarely…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:43 AM
5

Well here is a place to start at least. That link goes to a website for the most conclusive study on domestic violence worldwide. From the site: In this unprecedented undertaking, a total of 42 scholars and 70 research assistants at 20 universities and research institutions spent two years or more researching their topics and writing the results. Approximately 12,000 studies were considered and more than 1,700 were summarized and organized into tables. The 17 manuscripts, which provide a review …
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:27 AM
11

I still consider it mutilation even if done voluntarily. Why? well because it's still amputation of a significant amount of healthy bodily tissue. Tissue that we know have a special function, tissue that has a great deal of erogenous sensation. If a woman voluntarily had a cliterectomy is it still mutilation? The thing is that when it's consensual it's not mutilation of the person per se, but more of a mutilation of the actual body part. A piercing can be easily removed and the hole will for the…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:16 AM
1

Where would you say said bars are located? On a serious matter as a fellow swede I have actually heard none of this. What I have heard is that prostitution is apparently still very common and that in fact the majority of young people who sell their bodies are boys and young men. In fact you will never really be rid of prostitution as evidenced in the world today. I still think the best way is to legalize and unionize it along with heavy regulation.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:15 PM
2

Because in 1983 women already had equal rights to men, in fact they had even more rights than men even at that time (depending on how you look at it). Sure women were still largely expected to take care of the household, especially when children came into the picture. However there was nobody forcing them, they had the ability to study, take loans, work, there were already laws against discrimination in the workplace and pay etc. There were female doctors, female business owners, female workers …
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:01 PM
12

I have read quite a few stories like yours posted here from time to time. Most commonly it's women who have boyfriends/husbands, fathers, brothers, and or sons who are suffering from any kind of issue. They of course take the side of their loved ones and then gets to see a little bit of the world from that side. I would suggest you look up a woman called Christina Hoff Sommers. She considers herself a feminist but does talk a lot of the rights of men and boys as well. You don't have to leave fem…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 06:49 PM
63

Funny thing about this, they are setting up a clinic in Africa where women can get the repair surgery for free (seriously awesome). At the same time the Gates foundation (with friends) is working to pretty much socially pressure every man in Africa to get circumcised. Somewhere somebody has got to realize something is wrong here. They also mentioned in the article how they have been getting lot's of emails from men who want to reverse their circumcisions as well. Sadly for that I think we have t…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 05:49 PM
35

Phimosis is what it's called when the foreskin doesn't retract, it's not a malignant diagnosis but a medical name for a state of the penis. When it is a problem it's called pathological phimosis, that is when it causes pain or prevents urination. Technically it's correct, the kid has phimosis but it's nothing bad, rather that is the way it's supposed to be in that age.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 05:40 PM
3

I'm open to cooperation with feminists like Christina hoff Sommers and similar though. I don't really have that much against the label itself aside from the sour taste it leaves in my mouth. It's the majority of the "active" "believers" whose reasoning (or lack thereof) that I don't agree with at all.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:54 PM
1

They need several million dollars for this? Why don't they just take all their student positions and divide them equally into a male and female block. Keep the same requirements for enrollment but make sure they only enroll at a 50/50 rate. They can do the same for new teaching positions and whatever else they have. It could be a neat little experiment to see how things look a few years down the line. This is where we are headed anyways but I never ever see it mentioned anywhere. All the pushes …
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:31 AM
7

Which is really sad actually, I mean all these efforts done seemingly to help women and the only thing it does is fuck up the perception of female workers. In cases like these it doesn't matter if a woman were even more qualified than a lot of the men, all people are going to see is "she got in because she's a woman". Edit: The sad part is that the likelihood of that statement being true is only going to increase and that is only going to make it worse for the women who actually have the right q…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:19 AM
2

Under normal circumstances her female privilege would go a long way in protecting her from consequences but I don't know how strong it'll be against American society's neurosis about circumcision. I think it's good to remember that just as the "male privilege" (which does exist to some extent even if not as most people describe it) does not affect 100% of males, female privilege does not affect 100% of women either. Sadly in this case actually. It could even be argued that "male oppression" trum…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:16 PM
1

Wow, this makes the double standard painfully obvious. I don't know how things work in MMA with weight classes but AFAIK pretty much all contact sports have them for the sake of having an even match up. So given that you have men in her weight class there really shouldn't be a problem in matching them up. I mean we don't care when two men beat each other up when in the same class. And apparently we don't care when two women in the same class do the same. That even a prominent woman in the sport …
/r/MensRights07/03/15 11:05 AM
13

Is there no way we can help this woman? I don't know who she knows or where she is able to go but I would hide her and the kid in a heartbeat. But I mean is there anything we can do to help?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 10:56 AM
5

Most people here are not anti women, you will find most people here to be anti feminist though. You will find a lot of people who have been hurt bad and are angry at the injustice they and other men face. This has often been by the hand of women or because of women, and the fact that most feminists also are women there tends to be some generalization during discussion. If you decide to stick around for a while you will probably learn to see what people mean though. This is a place for discussion…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 09:19 PM
1

By that definition no one person can ever be sexist or racist, only the institution. It's also incredibly difficult to actually prove any kind of systemic or institutionalized sexism or racism. That is unless it's official praxis. The argument usually goes that because discrimination against women is so widespread that means it's systemic, the argument is completely false. There is no systemic sexism or even racism, because it has been illegal since the '60s. You will however find cases of indiv…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:11 PM
1

I could have phrased that better, I didn't really mean impartial but rather the ability to remain rational. A politician should push their agenda but that means it's the agenda that is important, not the affiliation of the pusher. I still can't find a good way to phrase my thoughts so just strike the impartial part altogether. On the other part you are pretty much saying what I meant. Democracy has always been a numbers game because the majority wins, that's sort of the one base pillar. That's w…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:07 PM
1

The issue has never been about gender roles or stereotypes but people love to pretend that it is. The funny thing is that they are not really combating the gender roles or stereotypes at all, not for men and not for women. All they do is try to influence what the stereotypes say. Indirectly they are actually strengthening the bad stereotypes for both men and women. The big problem is how we relate to the stereotypes, and now more and more commonly how people assume other people react to stereoty…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:56 PM
19

While I will take anything from the "Korea Times" with a hefty amount of salt this could well be true. The sad part is that this is how democracy dies. Does nobody see the issue with this? I mean what if you like one candidate on a "ticket" but dislike the other? This is a way to force a specific group of people into a power position and it completely ruins the credibility of people from this group. I mean would you trust a person who got to the position they are in solely because of a legislati…
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:37 PM
3

Women can do anything men can do, including raping, abusing, stealing, etc.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 11:01 PM
81

But violence against women is distinct from regular violence (meaning violence against men) in that it's directed at women and that's different because women.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 10:57 PM
4

And my point is that while not identical they are still similar enough for that analogy to be faulty. The problem is that people overestimate the destructive level of FGM while at the same time underestimate the destructive level of MGM. This is especially true when the two are compared. I am well aware that it's a hard sell and that is partly why it's so important to me. It is in a nutshell the entire representation of the mens rights movement into one issue. Society views penises as they view …
/r/MensRights26/02/15 04:37 PM
13

It's common for the entire clitoris to be removed. That's not the same. This is true, a cliterectomy can actually be "reversed" since it's only the external parts of the clitoris that is removed. The internal parts can be surgically exposed and turned into pseudo clitoris. It may not be as functional as what was removed but will definitely be much better. The nerves in the foreskin can never be brought back. One can argue about which is worse but personally I believe that whatever difference the…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:53 PM
1

(Guessing you meant 34, but this was still amusing) No I actually meant rule 63: "For any given male character, there is a female version of that character." but I was off by one and so sure of myself... I will let things stand though as it became much more funny than I intended.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:21 PM
13

Nah, I haven't looked in to it that much but apparently the "real Thor" Thor Odinson has some issues and can't use the hammer so someone else is doing it not. This has apparently happed on multiple occasions before but never with a woman. I'm not really well versed with the Thor lore though. From what I gather, female Thor is from earth and just happened to be worthy of wielding the hammer. Given her attitude I start to wonder what actually makes one worthy to wield the hammer in the first place…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 01:54 PM
3

Even in such an occasion why would the first reaction be to amputate? If the foreskin is so tight that urination becomes a problem all you have to do is expand the opening hole (in the actual foreskin) to a diameter of less than 5 mm. The pee hole is really tiny, and the opening in the foreskin need not be much bigger.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:47 PM
2

If you ever have a chance to contact that man again you could refer him to this, in fact, any attention given to this research would be good.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 12:38 PM
2

You can't even make or own your home-made-video of having legal sex with a 15 y.o. That is production and possession of child porn.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 05:29 PM
2

I only partially agree, mostly because where I'm from age of consent is 15. However in a teacher student relationship there is a special case in the law that changes age of consent to 18. This is for any type of relationship where the older party is in a guardian position. Here is the thing though, if you are 30 years old you know the law, you are an adult and should have the mental faculties to understand what is legal and what is not. While I can understand being seduced, it's not an excuse. T…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 12:45 PM
6

I can only imagine the level of cognitive dissonance going through the head of a straight female feminist while watching that move.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 10:42 AM
3

Yup, feminism is (arguably) for bringing rights to women, only rights and only to women. Yes this is overly simplified but I mean that's pretty much still what it is, all other parts are just excuses to give feminism more power so it can give more power to those it deems worthy. Anyways, it conveniently disregards that every right comes with responsibilities and actively works to keep those away from women. To change women's behavior would be to place a responsibility on women, or as they probab…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:03 PM
3

Yikes! It seems that once again the feminist movement is confusing reasons with excuses. By that I mean that whenever somebody tries to find some reasons for why a partner abuses the other it is seen as trying to find excuses and thus validating the act. By doing this they stab themselves in the foot because by not looking into why something happens they can never stop it from happening. In the words of Bill Burr: There are plenty of reasons to hit a woman! You just don't do it.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:45 PM
1

I against gendering issues on a whole because I feel it's rather counterproductive and overly simplifies the problem from the start. The outset needs to be that there are no "gendered" problems because the reality is always much more complicated than that. Gender can be a factor but never so large that it carries the whole issue. Heart disease is not a gendered issue, it affects a ridiculously huge amount of people and kills way too many of these people, be they men or women. Stats show that mor…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:32 PM
2

I assume because she had no proper income, she had a fortune yes, but no income or job. This means that when they split he was expected to pay to make sure she could keep a similar standard of living as she had before the divorce. This is also included in the child support, I assume it was calculated in accordance to his fortune and not hers. This is just pure speculation though.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:24 PM
2

I do my fair share of porn surfing... in fact I do quite a lot of it heh... Just doing some basic tag searches you'll find that in most regular tubesites you won't find anything regarding "rape" or anything directly related to it. "Abuse" and "brutal" tags amount to a fairly low amount less than half that of "tranny" and that's not even counting "trans" "transexual" or "ladyboy". The tag "love" is in turn almost ten times higher than the "tranny" one and that's not counting "romance" "lovers" an…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:02 AM
1

Yup and no ridiculous child support laws or even alimony laws. Yes we have child support here and yes it is handled quite poorly but it is nowhere near the cesspool that seems to be in the states. Yes there is a feministic party that will probably go over the 4% barrier in the next election (in four years... maybe). This gives them a mandate (I don't remember how much right now) to have direct influence in the riksdag (that would be our congress? well something like that but actually not at all,…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 12:23 AM
4

What does being a woman have to do with being talented? You know, if the were working towards having hidden gender applications and strictly going by merit alone I would actually be much more on board. I mean it feels a little bit of a long step to take but it would eliminate any kind of prejudice when taking applicants.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 12:04 AM
2

Though with Denmark they've mandated that one can identify as whatever gender without proof or even start of transition, so I can see that being claimed when it comes to things like that. Well, as long as you pay for it yourself I don't see why not. If the identified gender is without any sort of attempts at physically changing the biological sex I am a bit sceptical as to how official records should be handled though. Granted I don't know enough about the issue to say anything for sure though.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 12:01 AM
5

Yeah, college professors do more than teach as well, they do their own research and work (well some of them at least) with other things. They are simply there to give lectures and hold a course and they really shouldn't be expected to do much more. By the time you are in college as a student you are expected to be able to learn without the teacher holding your hand. It should not be a professors job to deal with students personal lives, thats what different parts of administration is for, I even…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 11:56 PM
1

Come on, their first add was hilarious, and apparently their first hire was even a woman[citation needed]. I mean the only thing even remotely sexist was the "makin it rain on dem hoes" and even though I don't get the reference I can still surmise that it's some sort of slang. The add makes it obvious what kind of person they are looking for and that is a good programmer who is most likely interested in sports and who can enjoy that kind of humor at least on some level. The other add was predict…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:05 PM
1

Patriarchy is defined by the dictionary as a "family, group, or government controlled by a man or several men." It's also about family members being considered related through their fathers. Granted the above statements makes no mention of there having to be some law that makes only men allowed to control the groups, or even about a ratio or men vs women in the case of several people controlling. This leaves much to interpretation but I'm going to explain my reasoning. We have had several exampl…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:46 PM
1

I was first going to say that drugs may be a gray area in this since they can be administered against your will or knowledge. But isn't that already a crime? Sex with someone that is unconscious and has not given prior consent is rape, and I think most of us agree there. But buying someone drinks in the hopes of getting them drunk horny and more likely to consent is not rape. I'd say in many cases it's a dick move but it's perfectly legal to be a dick and it should be. So if there was a drug tha…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 06:57 PM
26

several stares from primarily women stares of disgust from a select few overheard a writer for the newspaper (female) i mentioned earlier call me an "asshole" to her friend classmate (male) turns to me and says "why would you wear something like that" then shakes his head in disgust overweight "nerdy" kid in crocs says "that is satirical right" i respond "somewhat, why?" he responds "cause i dont know if need to beat the shit out of you or not" i respond "if you want to support my argument go ah…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:03 AM
1

I'm a bit late to the party but I'll throw my two cents to the pot as well. Yes this sub is an MRA sub, how you define MRA on the other hand... Yes, while I use a separate account for posting here and I consider myself a moderate and not an activist I feel that MRA's in general are heavily misrepresented and slandered by mainstream media. I'd rather feminism not be what it was or what it is than it not existing at all. You see women do face issues and there is nothing wrong with them being addre…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:46 PM
1

Reminds me of the "Motte and Bailey doctrine" way of arguing. It's a really interesting concept and if you can manage to plow through that wall of text the contents is really interesting.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 11:32 AM
2

What exactly is your argument? That this should have been in /r/MensRants probably. I could swear I read something about that in the sidebar a while ago but it's not there now so... I dunno.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:19 AM
21

suggested that girls should taste their own period blood and like it. O.o Just because it came out of the body does not mean you can or should put it back, or that you could use any applicable hole to do so.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:02 AM
1

What's wrong with being an angry feminist Well without diving into ideology I would say the angry part, I mean unless she likes being angry. Still anger is widely considered to not be a really positive emotion and I think most people can agree that we tend to not make good and well thought out decisions while angry. Also feminism is, and has been about equality for women and not about equality for all. And I don't care if they were literally Jesus for the first 30-40 years, that doesn't mean tha…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:56 AM
7

Never liked the guy, but that's mostly because of a personal suspicion I get about his whole character. He strikes me as the kind of person who one year can be a fully devout catholic and "religious nut" as I think the phrase is (I do not equal the two but I think people can get the nuance here). The next year he'll have found Allah and will preach just as devoutly from the Koran. And the year after that he'll be full on Atheist. Yeah I'm being a bit hyperbolic but you should get the gist and I'…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 09:40 AM
1

Yup, talk about invisible violence right?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:29 AM
9

Yeah I love how they actually start with the fact that privileged people are often unaware of their own privilege. Something that can actually be fairly true. However they don't take that obvious chance to give an honest look into their own situation and how that can be considered privileged. Especially when putting all that effort and energy into describing the privileges of people whose lives they couldn't even begin to understand. It's not even a topic of discussion, it's delivered as pure fa…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:19 PM
15

Actually it's pretty much just as likely that you would. Source here. The funny thing is that if you are homosexual and male you are less likely to suffer partner abuse than if you were female and in a homosexual relationship. But calling that privilege is just asinine.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:11 PM
5

Really? Go red for women... Each year 1 in 3 women die... help save womens lives... It's not just a mans disease. Only women on the poster. I appreciate the difference and that men are considered to be the ones who mostly suffer from this disease, but to just abandon them completely?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:05 PM
4

By making it all about women instead?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:38 PM
8

I feel like they are trying to do something like Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron(Excuse the poor quality, best I could find). What they are doing completely lacks finesse and subtlety, they are exaggerating the issues in absurdum and being blatantly obvious. Yes it's satire but I think it could have been handled much better.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 09:53 PM
10

The Oscar statuette is a gilded white man holding a sword – basically, a phallus holding a phallus. I find it hilarious to point out to people mentioning Freudian stuff like this that it speaks more about their own minds than anyone else's. If she looks at the Oscar statuette and sees a penis holding a penis... well I will leave it to anyone to figure out where her mind is. Nagging about people who didn't win an Oscar and using that as some sort of evidence is just hilarious. Every single year t…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:10 PM
6

They'll toss out the usual "what about the kids" bullshit, as if that really justifies financially enslaving a man in order to force him to provide for someones else's bastard progeny. If they don't know who the father is I'd say they put both themselves and their kids in this situation. If they do know who the father is they still put themselves in the situation but now the kid actually has a chance to know it's own father. They can pressure that guy for financial responsibilities instead. It's…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:47 PM
59

Why would someone still be together with their partner if they hold them in such contempt? Seriously.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:32 PM
1

Long live the patriarchy!
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:24 PM
1

Not really sadly, I'm from Sweden so the most I have are some Swedish sources. Doing some research about male circumcision, foreskins, and all that jazz is really scary because you see the vast differences in facts. We don't circumcise boys here and our national doctors association has actually demanded the practice being made illegal on several occasions. So before posting this I did a search and came across This very good article about foreskins and the difference between physiological and pat…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 10:51 PM
3

It's in the wording, using the word "reasonable" does make it come off as condoning of the action.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:33 PM
5

Even if it persists to adulthood it still doesn't make it "bad". I wanted to say medical condition, but everything is a medical condition depending on how you look at it so... What you are thinking about is Pathological Phimosis, where there is considerable pain or detriment to quality of life.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:55 PM
1

Gotta warm up the waterworks first ya know.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:51 PM
5

The thing is that even if you don't compare the actual procedures this is pretty much exactly what a lot of African women say when they hear about our stance on female circumcision. Again disregard what is actually being done, one being worse than the other is not relevant here for the time being. The fact is that a lot of African women don't consider themselves mutilated, they think they are beautiful and they can't wait until they can do it to their own daughters. It's horrifying to us to thin…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:49 PM
3

Umm how do you know if you had phimosis if you were only 3 when you were circumcised?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:31 PM
7

Let me tell you something about phimosis (which appears to be what you had). Phimosis is a natural condition of the penis in young boys, it's a binding tissue between the glans and the foreskin, this tissue is the same kind of tissue that holds your nails to your fingers. In the US it is exceedingly common that neither parents nor nurses or even doctors actually know how the healthy uncut penis works. This leads to an unfortunate amount of boys who have their foreskins forcibly retracted at a ve…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 01:28 PM
7

My future son will get it just as I have. It is not a violation of a mans right to choose for himself. Do you even realize the contradiction of what you just said? Infant circumcision is literally taking away the choice of not having someone permanently alter your genitals.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:58 PM
2

So we should knowingly brainwash our kids in order to decide their future? That's some Orwellian shit right there.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:32 PM
0

Humans don't need to die out in order for salmon to thrive... we just need to do a little less fishing.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:29 PM
4

Reading this hurts my brain... there is so much wrong here I don't even know where to begin. I bet you could actually get this person to starve themselves with a well though out argument against eating greens and vegetables as well.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:30 PM
2

I really hate having to use a urinal, I just don't like them for pretty much all the reasons you mentioned, plus the fact that there is a very real risk of splash. That being said, in an emergency they can feel like a godsend, I mean when you gotta go you gotta go. You suggestion isn't actually half bad, they do have similar contraptions in Asia (I have seen them in both Japan and China), though the ones I have seen could use a bit of modernization.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 12:17 PM
18

I am a little bit bothered by pretty much everyone claiming that men are too ashamed to come out and say that they are abused. Sure that is true too but people seem to forget that those that do say something are ignored, berated, or even accused of being the perpetrator. Why the fuck would I tell anyone that I have been abused if no one would believe me, or if I get laughed in the face?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:07 AM
1

Apparently it was a male and not just a teacher it was the headmaster of the school. Here is the original danish article And here is the translated (by google) article if that makes it more understandable
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:09 PM
1

I'm from sweden where we share much of the same standards and let me tell you that even what you write would be cause for immediate termination of the teacher. This isn't just a joke, this was actually done, I could have understood if it was just a threat as a joke, but these are 7 year old kids first of all, they would probably not understand such a joke. Second of all, the teacher should have stopped this as soon as either boy even tried to remove a piece of his clothing. This is not just a jo…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:44 PM
1

I don't really agree to this because of one very big and very basic difference. Religion is a choice, maybe not as much of a choice for all people but still a choice. Gender is not a choice it is something you are born with, much like skin color. I do however agree with the premise to show a different angle to the hysteria regarding the notallmen thing.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 01:17 PM
1

Thank you, that was really interesting to listen to.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 01:00 PM
8

The big issue with feminism is that it is a point of view, a philosophy, a political opinion, but it is being preached and now even socially accepted as a definite truth. Feminism is not just the belief that women and men should be considered having equal worth. It's a great thing to fall back on but feminism is so much more than that, feminism is the blind acceptance that women have been historically oppressed, and to a much greater extent than men. That is basically the very core of feminism, …
/r/MensRights11/01/15 01:00 PM
1

Is there a way to view the video without relocating to the uk? It sounds like an interesting debate.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 12:03 AM
2

none of us thought the Matrix sequels were good. I mean, the effects were decent, for the time at least.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:51 PM
15

What the actual fuck!!! How the hell does that teacher still get to work? the school’s deputy chairman of the board, said: ‘It is correct that it happened and that this type of humour is something that we on the board naturally do not condone.’ Humor? How the hell do you get away with calling the public humiliation, sexual humiliation, and violent threats (to say the very least) humor? The teacher should be put behind bars, the chairman should be fired, the boys should get a hefty sum for their …
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:48 PM
1

I would also say clickbait if not for the sheer length of the "article", I mean she goes on for ages about the basic human rights and how everyone should be equal under the law. The she suddenly proclaims that ethnic minorities should be treated with special care. Because if something offends a person belonging to a minority then it's automatically a hate crime. That is fucking insane. I mean I think it's time we had a worldwide mandatory annual reading of George Orwell so at least some people c…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:34 PM
2

I have seen those kinds of responses way to often now that I thought I'd just shut them down preemptively. But yes, it would really be folly to think that cutting off a normal natural part of your body would make you better at something to do with that body part. Cutting off a finger won't make me a better writer, cutting off my ear won't make me a better musician, etc.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 11:16 PM
3

That was fucking awesome!
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:49 PM
3

So what you are saying is that feminism has missed out on an opportunity of claiming that men make 30% more than women instead of women making 23% less than men? The wonders of maths.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:36 PM
6

Why would a doctor agree to this? There is no research that shows sexual enjoyment to be better for circumcised men or their partners. There is research that shows the opposite however. This guy could have done some keagel exercises for a few months and seen much more improvement. I don't object to his right to do what he wants but he didn't want to get circumcised, he wanted to be able to have a better sexual experience together with his wife. He is never going to get that sensitivity back and …
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:37 AM
1

I don't remember the details but some guy had left his kid in the car for several hours during the summer. Turned out he had been going on several websites looking for how long it would take before a child would die from that. Among those sites were the childfree sub. The media got wind of it and all hell broke loose. See a lot of people over there actively don't like kids at all so it's a place to vent, tell offensive jokes, voice unpopular opinions, etc. So naturally media thought that /r/chil…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 09:35 AM
6

Taking a look at the armor in question I don't really see how it's much different from any other "male power fantasy" out there... It's also not really anything new from the final fantasy series, sure I can't really recall a male character in spandex... but I really can't recall a female character like that either. Now if we are talking bare chests, and "sexy" physique on the other hand this could almost be considered tame.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:50 PM
7

and gave Sephiroth a boob window. So I wasn't the only one mislead by that "cleavage" or what you should call it. Also yeah, Final Fantasy is no stranger to impractical design of basically everything, then again that is part of the point of video games, at least fantasy/sci-fi ones. If you have the ability to create a world however you wish it to be, why limit yourself to the mundane and realistic?
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:42 PM
1

Yeah, that is precisely why I have this separate account for posting here. Sure I could be doxxed but that would be the loss of the person doing that.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:32 PM
6

I used to hang around /r/childfree a while ago, before the whole media uproar and trolls started streaming in, I can't vouch for how it is now though. When I was there I would run across multiple accounts from both men and women where this were the case or the doctor would just plainly refuse if you had no wife and kids. It differs a lot from doctor to doctor but you can see a geographical trend correlating with religious intensity. cough bible belt cough
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:15 PM
7

It is okay for you to post this here, I understand why you would ask though. Feminism for the most part isn't held in very high regard (I don't really either) around here, but this is mostly due to common issues that people here have faced from proclaimed feminists. I try not to judge people too soon but even I am only human in that regard, sometimes I have a bad day and the phrase "as a feminist" is enough to be the drop that makes the cup run over. I'm not proud of that, but it does happen. To…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:10 PM
9

Oh it is pretty widespread, but it can differ strongly from doctor to doctor. It's obviously more common in certain areas than others though.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:55 PM
1

It's not harming mother earth that is the most dire problem, she will soon be back to her former glory after we are gone. The big problem is that ever since the industrial revolution our society has constantly moved towards needing less and less people (workers). At the same time world population has boomed, leaving us where we are today. It's not that we can't feed everyone on earth, we can, the problem is distribution of food, the problem is that we throw away obscene amounts of food everyday.…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:56 PM
21

Oh they want sex, and they get sex. What they don't want is procreative sex, they don't want relationships, because they don't have the time. They are having careers and they want to keep having careers so they don't have time to raise children. They also don't want a man who is a homemaker either because that is just not manly and not sexy. Why do you think host and hostess bars are so popular there? Office workers go out and party and get drunk at night, they have drunken sex, wake up the next…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:10 PM
2

and I heard several repeat the phrase "believe victims." This is true to some respect and one of the most wrong moves ever if the goal is to take an objective standpoint. Which is the very mission given to all instances of law enforcement. Believing the victim is the very last thing you should ever do because no one is more biased than them. Sometimes they are even traumatized in which case we know what the mind is capable of concocting. Should the victims statements be taken into account? Most …
/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:03 PM
3

I mentioned that further down in my comment, well sort of, with the fingers and thumbs deal. The very fact that she makes an absolute statement pretty much seals it as bullshit so I went for it as if it was a generalization proving that even that was bullshit. Of course there is a glass ceiling but it applies to all of us, if you just compared the salaries of men you would find some discrepancies and favoritism there but because all are men you can't blame gender. Some people just get away with …
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:46 PM
16

Her entire premise is inherently bigoted, divisive, and overly generalizing and patronizing towards both men and women. It's also factually wrong all the way through. First of all, sexism is not power + prejudice. Sexism is prejudice on the basis of a persons sex. If sexism were power + prejudice then racism would also be sexism, because whites have more power than blacks, hypothetically. It also fails to state what kind of power we are talking about, influential power? physical power? intellect…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:26 PM
1

Chance... so it's not about rights it's about statistics and probability? You chance of succeeding is not directly affected by the current distribution of sexes who succeed. Are there social "pressures"? yes! And there will continue to be social pressures of different kinds and magnitude as long as we live in societies because that's how societies work. In reality it's not asking much, only that you follow a certain etiquette when interacting with people and legitimately try to actually be usefu…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:26 PM
12

See if Allah or God didn’t want us to be aroused as women, why give us a clitoris in the first place. See if Allah of God didn't want us to have a foreskin (and all of the proven positive things that it grants) why give us (and pretty much every male animal with a penis) a foreskin in the first place? Also female circumcision does not really have that much effect on actual "arousal" and with the little actual research that exists, it has about the same effects on the ability to experience sexual…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:51 PM
1

18-year-old Chastity Angel Plummer Are you kidding me with that name? First of all that's a dick move by her parents, I mean they gave her two choices of profession with that name and the odds were always where she ended up. I know I shouldn't joke but that really caught me off guard. Also I'm not really against her on this, I mean yeah, false claims and all is an ass move especially to real victims. Still if I were in that situation I would not hesitate in the slightest to do the same. It's irr…
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:31 PM
5

I know the law probably disagrees with me but I would actually go with assault. A verbal contract is still legally binding (at least where I come from) and the agreement specifically said that you would receive $1000 minimum, your agreeing to the conditions are dependent on that. That agreement is what separates it from being assault and when the other party is not holding up their part of the deal it will then vanish. Thus there is nothing separating it from actual assault. I'm not sure if you …
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:24 PM
2

relevant to your dilemma if you ever feel the need to show them actually indisputable data to support your point. Don't be fooled by the 1998 look of the page, it's legit and recent.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 10:16 PM
7

That was incredibly interesting and educational. A perfect example of a good debate, done politely and with facts, by two professionals in the same field but with differing interpretations of available data. Both agree that both biology (genetics) and socialization play a role in how we lead our lives. The difference in opinion is about the scale of impact each part has on us and our lives. I really like one of the last points made that when the social barrier towards higher educations were remo…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 01:21 AM
4

It all depends on your point of view actually. Rare and common are highly subjective and relative terms, which means that you could basically use them however you damn please. Which, don't get me wrong, is quite a bother. Rape is not common, but it's not exactly rare either, I mean it still happens to both men and women. It's just like robberies and muggings, and murders, they are definitely not common, but if you look for them exclusively you will find quite a lot of them.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:09 PM
10

That is actually a very important thing to note in these cases. This means that the number of men who were "forced to penetrate" (lit. raped) are completely invisible in this report. Despite that males still accounted for 17% of student victims. Imagine removing the requirement of vaginal penetration for female victims and see how many are left... I know it's not the same but it would make for some interesting comparisons. In the end though I never bother to look at male stats in these kinds of …
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:02 PM
1

you can still consent to sex when you're intoxicated. you can't when you're incapacitated. and by what Dunham says she took that night, it doesn't sound like she would have been that intoxicated. Yup, the thing is that just because you don't remember an event clearly or even at all, does not mean that you were not lucid at the time. We will never know the real truth of the matter though, since all we have to go on are the memories of someone who at the time was both drunk and high (if I understa…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:48 AM
1

I can understand your point but but I explained why I felt this way in the post. Those civilizations did not have any of the modern luxuries and abilities we have today, nor did they have the kind of medical technology and advances we have today. With artificial insemination, available adoption worldwide and medical aid during and after birth to ensure the health of both mother and child. Also the very structure of our society is made to enable single parenting more and more, and while I don't a…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:41 AM
1

Hmm... Maybe, I'm still too much of a chicken to post views like this outside of this sub though. That and I probably gloss over a multitude of complexities in the development of our society. Still, it's a reasoning and a world view that I have had for quite a while now, and it's one that I feel offers respect to pretty much all people while still acknowledging some harsh truths.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:13 AM
1

If this were /r/changemyview[1] , I'd give you a delta! Sweet! I'm glad I could contribute.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 11:02 AM
3

Ooooooh! You should definitely add that in the beginning of the post... because (even though it seems kinda obvious thinking back) that was not what I took away from the story.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 06:26 PM
9

Masculinity is the "section" in which we place or take masculine things from. The very concept of masculinity was already there even before our society had even grasped the concept of a concept. I like to start from the beginning with these things, let's say about the time we started venturing out of our cozy little caves. The men were hunters, being away from home on dangerous expedidions to secure some of that essential protein (and pelts, and bones, and any other stuff you could get from an a…
/r/MensRights06/12/14 06:19 PM
2

Yo dawg!
/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:16 PM
9

Yup, they do, shocking isn't it? The reason arises if they add just one more level of detail though, a huge part of the women who consume games only consume what could be called "casual games". Candy crush, bejeweled, point and click games etc. The amount of women who would consume games such as borderlands or left 4 dead (as mentioned in the article), while not small is not on the same level as the amount of men. I would decline having a score like this on my game if I ever made one though, sin…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 06:32 PM
2

It is your opinion yes but you are basing it on an extremely narrow minded pretense and flawed facts. You are still entitled to have your opinion but I'm going to argue against it and you can do with that what you will. but I'd be much happier getting it done when I'm born than I would be now. Don't remember pain, don't remember anything This is illogical reasoning from the start, you acknowledge that it's a negative experience by saying that basically you are glad that you don't remember it bei…
/r/MensRights27/11/14 04:40 PM
1

I meant the politics of the party itself, not the politics of some of its members. I was mainly talking about the immigration policies and requirements for citizenship.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 05:04 PM
5

Yeah, I usually have that as a backup saying that while the parents have religions freedom so does the child and they have no right to permanently mark him to their religion until he is old enough to decide himself. They are still free to raise the child however they want, the only restriction is that they may not cut into his penis. Sounds pretty reasonable to me.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:53 PM
37

Increased alcohol consumption and a culture that pushes sex on both men and women. Coupled with telling women that if they had sex while drunk or agreed to sex when they weren't really sure and it resulted in at least feeling bad afterwards they were raped. Well of course that would lead to higher risks of "sexual assault" damn how stupid are people? Drunk people make drunk decisions and those are seldom good decisions especially not from a risk POV in general. Teenage people have raging hormone…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:46 PM
2

Oddly enough the only two political parties who are officially against male circumcision are pretty much polar opposites of each other. On the one hand you have Feministic Initiative or "Fi!" and on the other you have the Swedish Democrats "SD". I probably don't have to say that much about Fi! since it's the basic crazy feminist rethoric and ideals coupled with some scary notions of direct political involvement in all levels of education. SD is known as a racist party with many of it's members b…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:36 PM
19

I once had a discussion about this with someone who brought up the religious right thing when I told him something to that respect. I said that what we you are debating here is a persons right to cut off a part of their infants genitals. What I am debating here is that unless it's urgently medically necessary, that is something up to the child itself to decide when it's of legal age. Basically arguing for circumcision is arguing for peoples rights to cut into their own babies most sensitive and …
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:20 PM
7

Never have I wanted to share something on facebook or whatever more than this. Sadly enough because of their positions withing their respective religions their words carry more weight than the ones from an atheist like myself. “You don’t fight a disease by amputating healthy organs, even in cases, in which this amputation assures a great reduction in risk like in breast cancer.” I don't know how many times I have brought up this in circumcision discussions, there was a time when we would amputat…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 07:06 PM
1

Oh I agree with you fully on that, I don't like the phrasing either it's just that even though I don't like it it had a bit of truth to it.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 06:23 PM
1

I'm not sure I put my point across well enough. What I meant with the celebration aspect was that in the article linked in the OP the author asks what there is to celebrate with an international mens day. My point was that there is nothing to celebrate there is however many things to bring "into the light" about the situation of men. Then with your quote from the website I was first appalled by it but then I realized that the statement is true but probably not in the way it was intended to be. A…
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:57 PM
1

wait what? Still the statement is not entirely wrong, sacrifice is one of the things that is expected of men everywhere. It shouldn't be though and that is the reason why we do need a day. It's not a day for celebration it should be a day for awareness, just as the international womens day should be a day for awareness of the actual issues that women actually face.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:11 PM
3

Who the hell doesn't want to be supported by their employer? Thing is that when feminists say that they are not supported by their employer what they actually mean is that their employer is not holding their hands every step of the way. I want to be supported buy my boss and my coworkers but I want to do my own fucking work. I don't want a prize for participation that says "you did your best", the fact is that prizes like that will not make me do my best either. I have made mistakes and what mak…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:00 PM
3

HA! Thank you, now I understand the funny part.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:00 PM
6

Also - "classicists" was a pretty funny slip. I actually used the word correcting thing since classist wasn't recognized, why is it funny? (non native English speaker here) I don't think it's a slippery slope as long as you know what you are doing. I know the fact that there are races in the first place is heavily debated but going on visual cues alone it seems pretty damn likely. However this does not mean that there are any other differences other than visual (skin color). There are social dif…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:51 PM
5

Well it is an observation which given the samples provided is quite accurate. Note that the statement here is that people who have low impulse control are more likely to be poor not the other way around. Also poor people are very likely to be classicists themselves and care less about what they say to people of a different social class. The more you have the more you have to loose, but if you have little you have little to loose.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:32 PM
6

People with less impulse control are much more likely to be poor/out of a job, not that all poor or jobless people have less impulse control.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:24 PM
2

Well I never argue about how it is preformed or under what circumstances since those can change any procedure into a barbaric one. I argue what is actually done and what that means. On a greater scale I find the two fairly comparable (disregarding infibulation) but I don't really care. Just because cutting off an arm is worse than cutting off a hand doesn't make any of them less wrong.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:21 AM
2

Not necessarily a causation but I did read somewhere that the two countries where viagra is most widely used are where circumcision is also most common. There is one study done on this that suggests a causation but the sample size was considered too small. There has been no follow-up that I know. It is my own uneducated opinion but I don't think it's that outlandish to assume that amputation of a significant part of an organ will diminish the functionality of said organ.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:20 AM
1

Well in the case of sensitivity it actually is equivalent, also you actually do hear about cutting the labia off. FGM ranges from the tiniest pinprick to the removal of all external genitalia. If you were joking or sarcastic you can disregard this.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:12 AM
1

Classy stuff!
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:07 PM
7

In todays modern world I'm not really sure it's placed on anyone (unless you hang around really religious circles) at least in a serious manner. There are guys who can get intimidated and/or turned off by a woman that has had many partners but that works in reverse too, and that is perfectly fine. I do realize that some women shame each other for that stuff though, the whole sexual market and all that.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:07 AM
2

It's Manhood academy spam, I don't know about now but I recall them being the only ones who are not welcome here on account of constantly spamming bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:00 AM
5

This is not personal jab at you but you do realize that you probably prefer to be that way because you have been that way since birth right? But yeah there is nothing anyone here wants to do to stop adults from doing what they want to their bodies.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 06:31 PM
7

Wasn't the white ribbon all against ending violence against women? When did it change and become better than itself?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:25 PM
2

What did I miss? Edit: never mind, I found it and now my head hurts real bad.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:13 PM
3

I am going through something similar to you, I am interested in the issues that men face and the "other side" of what is usually reported. Only here will I actually hear tales of men who suffer and every once in a while some good workable solutions to problems. Finding these things and reading about all the shit however, will affect you and will drag you into negativity. I usually sit down and write, I write down what I'm thinking, my ideas and solutions to problems, my frustrations, etc. Then I…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:14 AM
6

"Sometimes the best way to solve your own problems is to help someone else." /Iroh
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:02 AM
1

Always be recording.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:00 AM
1

The only thing that wouldn't be something "given" to her is school for the kids. Everything else is things that she wants to be given in one way or the other. She wants kids, she wants him to propose, she wants to cuddle, she wants sex, she wants grandkids, she wants to be asked to dates, and she wants flowers. You can also replace each wants with expects if you wish.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:59 PM
5

So just because someone else cut off the arm of somebody it's okay to cut off someones hand? They do it worse so what we are doing isn't wrong? WTF? While I can't possibly find any kind of cartoon to be objectification because they are fucking cartoons, objects to begin with. And if you get your beauty standards from a Disney movie I think you may need to talk to a specialist because that is way over my head. How do they live with their stupid? Male professional athletes don't need to be convent…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:53 PM
96

Wow... Do they even understand what they are saying and doing? First of all there are still single sex education facilities? And on the college level? I thought that was a thing of the past, or am I missing something? Anyways let's keep going. A women’s college is a place to celebrate being a woman, surrounded by women. I felt empowered by that every day. You come here thinking that every single leadership position will be held by a woman: every member of the student government, every newspaper …
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:31 PM
1

More people who ever participate in a discussion on this topic should see this! To many people see this as a one sided issue when it's not, it's a complex maze of gray areas and needs to be addressed that way. Until the issue can be viewed and discussed in a logical way it will never be solved. And again people do as people do, not as people say. Many women are attracted to a "take charge" kind of guy and so many men will realize this and adapt. There is still a complex courtship dance going on.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:35 PM
3

The worst part is that there are plenty of people who will actually get right on that. Stuff like that seriously scares me sometimes.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:15 PM
1

I'm usually against the whole notion that media dictates society, I still think it's the other way around. Still there is no denying that it actually has some notion of an effect since it does add to our world view. (it's a long and interesting but complex topic to discuss and this is not the time or the place). Still I find it a step in the right direction and a touch of novelty to a fairly played out concept.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:38 AM
4

there are extremists in the feminist world, you shouldn't focus on them The proper answer to that is with another question, "why?" Why, they are not just a few dozens of people, there are quite a lot of them and they obviously justify considering themselves feminists. Wouldn't it be worth to take a look at these groups and try to figure out why they exist? Why they think it's okay to hit men and laugh and joke about it. Wouldn't it be an incredible sign of good faith to actively and publicly cal…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:30 AM
2

Everyone has a hard time finding a job, there are a myriad of variables when it comes to stuff like this. You could have said the wrong thing in an interview, you could have worn the wrong thing, you could have bad luck with other people who apply for the same job being better than you in any way, you could apply to a bad place, you could be one of the dozens of applications that go straight to the trash. There is no real way to weigh gender into job hunting. You can look at how things look now,…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:20 AM
3

So, if no one had been collection the child support for several years... where is it? Wouldn't anyone handling this stuff be questioning things?
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:14 AM
1

Do you want children or not? Regardless of what she says, this is about you and only you. If you don't then get a vasectomy and make sure you listen to the doctor. You can even bring this up with her if you want to see her reaction. If she's acting in any way unreasonable that is a red flag, if she refuses to listen to reason that is a redder flag. I'm not an American but from what I hear California is like the worst state to be in when it comes to these matters.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:01 AM
12

Your personal life does not determine what you earn, they are trying to use a statistical correlation as a statistical causation. What you earn is based upon your chosen profession and position, how well you can negotiate your salary, how much you work (or how well you can strategically get others to do your work for you), your credentials and abilities, and what company you actually work for. Fathers in the us mostly take on more work in order to provide for the family while the mothers usually…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 12:14 PM
1

I don't know about Norway, but when we had this in Sweden all males of a certain age were required to show up and be "tested". Your physical abilities and your mental abilities were tested along with a short psychological evaluation. When I got my letter it first stated that this testing was mandatory and if you didn't show up a police escort would take you there plus being fined and even risk prison. Later on it stated that since you chose to show up they now basically owned you and could place…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:54 AM
1

As you can imagine, we have many different backgrounds in our group. Unfortunately, some come from a religious background that supports circumcision based on a holy rite in their core of beliefs. We are divided on this quite a bit, however, there has been some progress to include voluntary circumcision as a right for men upon their 18th birthday in our group agenda. Ah yes, I am too used to discussing this topic here, I meant of course infant circumcision. What people do when they are 18/21/what…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:34 AM
1

We target systematic inequalities found in education, justice, and political arenas. Laws and regulations that are causing inequalities just by existing. How would you define inequalities? I'm genuinely curious actually. We are aware of other Men's Rights fringe factions who commit these actions consistently. We bring this one to the forefront as we were sure this one was cemented in the subreddit's history. I was not fully aware that things like this kept on happening, I fully disagree with the…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:48 AM
6

We only seek to end any international conscription for both genders. Our group feels as this is a gross misconduct of power. Agreed! As has been stated here on numerous occasions; the only reason female conscription is brought up is as a demonstrative example of gender bias in the issue. "The day the conscription laws become gender neutral is the day they cease to exist." This is gendered to begin with, the preferred term should be Legal Parental Surrender as there have been cases where fathers …
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:08 AM
2

You are still responsible for your actions while drunk, even if you can't recall them. I have been sober at parties enough times to know that a whole lot of people do some crazy shit while drunk, but they are definitely sentient enough to do these things. If you disagree, feel free to get really drunk and then sign your car and house over to a perfect stranger. As far as I know, something like this would actually be legally binding, I believe this is the very reason alcohol is supposedly so chea…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 11:04 AM
-2

You don't know what happened, so unless you ask her what really happened and how you ended up in bed together and actually believe what she says you will never know. It is very possible she took advantage of your impaired state of mind, maybe you were even half unconscious. But, and this is what people hate, you may well have been actively consenting to it all as well. The fact that you don't remember anything doesn't mean you didn't actually do anything and when you are drunk you often do stupi…
/r/MensRights09/10/14 07:58 AM
9

"I can't even think of a woman who has ever not taken off her clothes to become more famous." Reminds me of I think it was Louis CK who said something about why women always turned to Madonna as a role model and not Thatcher. About how Thatcher rose to the top of the most male dominated position and stayed there and never even hinted at taking of her clothes... or something like that. Also, if a man could get more famous by dropping his trousers he'd be naked faster than you can say wiener.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 10:12 PM
2

And ridicule men for being hurt by it." With text like: "She grabbed my crotch...You're upset by that? Faggot." I think it would be more along the lines of "was she hot?"
/r/MensRights07/10/14 11:44 AM
3

You are welcome to use this! The world's largest domestic violence research data base, 2,657 pages, with summaries of 1,700 peer-reviewed studies. Over the years, research on partner abuse has become unnecessarily fragmented and politicized. The purpose of The Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project (PASK) is to bring together in a rigorously evidence-based, transparent and methodical manner existing knowledge about partner abuse with reliable, up-to-date research that can easily be accessed bo…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 11:03 AM
1

Is nobody catching the irony in a woman selling positive pregnancy tests to be able to feed her children? If it wasn't so sad I would actually laugh. Seriously though the worst interest loan in the world would probably have been cheaper than actually getting pregnant in order to feed your children. Also, Vasalgel can't get here soon enough for all those men unfortunate enough to not have had the ability or desire to get a vasectomy. I however breathe a sigh of relief every time I come across som…
/r/MensRights06/10/14 08:59 PM
5

There is the risk that the MRM could go the way of feminism... but it is incredibly small. I don't see the MRM as an egalitarian movement (wait a second, put down your pitchfork and let me finish) in that we are advocating for the rights of men. Trans men, gay men, and trans women too in a way but men nonetheless in one way or the other. Many of us may well consider themselves egalitarian, and I do too actually, but the movement itself is not really. I hope to one day see the MRM actually die of…
/r/MensRights06/10/14 08:49 PM
1

I have seen the trailer and knew pretty much instantly what the movie was going to be about. I'm still gonna go see it though, and I'm really glad it's being made. Might actually help bring some seriously overlooked issues to light.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 08:20 PM
2

Takes this wheel, reverse the genders, then go through some of the most common tv and movie relationships and weep at the results. If you want to make it even worse for yourself limit things to whenever there is an argument or fight.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:25 AM
4

I'm divided on age of consent laws, however not when it concerns positions of actual power. A teacher, parent, guardian, priest, police officer, rock star, caretaker, or whatever should know much better than to have sex with a minor in their care. I don't care if "they wanted it" do we let kids do whatever they want these days? (don't answer that...) Sex is not a necessity, I mean unless you have some serious other issues you won't actually be harmed from not having sex when you are 14. However …
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:57 PM
4

Somehow I doubt even the "feminists" can do much harm to the Fry.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:38 PM
1

"These women are hot!" I really hate statements like this, coming from both women and men actually. There's something a raped woman will probably never hear and that would be the relevant version of "Was she hot?" I would love to spread the word that men can say "no!" too, and men actually want to say "no!".
/r/MensRights02/10/14 09:58 PM
6

Well as long as the scar looks nice he should be okay, I mean chicks dig scars! /S
/r/MensRights02/10/14 09:40 PM
1

Happy is such a relative term.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:21 PM
5

Ask for a definition of patriarchy, make some popcorn, sit back and enjoy the show.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 05:40 AM
5

I know that women in this world face hardships, I have seen it myself, my mother was abused in both her marriages and was actually constantly put down and pushed aside in favor of her brother. I have seen female friends resort to cutting themselves not for attention but because they couldn't handle the pressure put on them. So I know full well that women too face issues and inequalities. This is why I urge women and girls to join us, to stand up and do their part, because if women stay in the wo…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 10:35 AM
6

Excellent speech, excellent points! Thinking back, the only times I have been asked about my problems, about what bothers me I was either under the age of ten, ignored or laughed at when I answered, or the question was rhetorical as in "what is your problem!!!!?" If a woman, a feminist, an egalitarian, a whatever, should wonder about why men are the way they are they need but to ask and actually listen for once. Take a moment, set aside yourself and walk a mile in the other persons shoes for onc…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 06:29 PM
1

I know but this was within the pretext of the dictionary definition being the the end all be all of sorts. I know that language is fluid but I wanted to discuss an idea given some set perimeters from the dictionary. I mean it's basically useless to use any words that apply any sort of value since they're pretty much all subjective. We might as well be discussing apples and gasoline. Anyways, why is that interesting? I'm just curious.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:31 AM
3

I disagree, the entire basis of my argument was to disregard the connotations since they are by definition subjective and will vary from person to person. It's useless to debate subjective interpretations for this very reason, but this isn't about being subjective this is about being objective. There would be no need for me to even bring the dictionary definitions into this if were were going by the connotations of a word. We are not discussing the nuances of linguistic evolution here, we are di…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 11:59 AM
0

I'm not doubting you but can you tell me where to find some official statistics on this? I have been searching for prevalence rates of the different types of FGM over the world but so far I have had no luck. It would certainly be helpful to find some kinds of statistics or sources on this.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:49 AM
6

No disfigured is not subjective, did you even read the definition? Whether it's a "positive", "negative", or "neutral" disfigurement is subjective though, but it's still disfigurement. think that is reaching a bit far to say that every man that has had a circumcision is injured (I'm assuming you mean psychology?) by it. If I injure your finger I also injure you right? If someone injures your penis they also injure you right? Circumcision removes living tissue and draws blood, it also leaves a sc…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 07:22 AM
8

$100 Or she is free to sue the employer on grounds of unequal pay since it has been illegal to pay differently according to gender since the 1960's. The real answer would be "as much as she able to convince her employer that she's worth being paid, like any other human in a salary negotiation" though, I guess that wouldn't do as an answer though.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 09:40 PM
6

I will copypaste a post I posted recently on this topic. First of all some definitions, these are all from a dictionary (I don't recall which but it matters little). Mutilate: to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts. Disfigure: to mar the appearance or beauty of; deform;deface Deform: to mar the natural form or shape of; put outof shape; disfigure With that out of the way let's state some facts (I'm tired and have no time to go look up the sources on thi…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 09:23 PM
1

That's also something to think about, how do you quantify misery? How can you tell that one person suffers more than another? Women may suffer in one way while men suffer in another and they may both actually suffer to an equal degree only in different ways.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:11 PM
87

So uh... sidebar with this post maybe? yes?
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:04 PM
0

The whole good guy / bad guy had nothing to do with what she said, I mentioned it to illustrate people saying one thing and then acting the complete opposite to that. if they want to be. Ha! Her statement does not exist in a vacuum, especially not when it comes to things like this. It's not about being "nice" if you want to, it's about making you want to be "nice". It's already accepted to be "nice" or less aggressive or even not aggressive. It's just that the way the world works right now that …
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:33 PM
0

Well the whole badboy/goodguy part really had nothing to do with Emma's situation here. It's the same type of deal though. The point was to illustrate saying one thing and doing another.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:42 PM
3

I know, I just wish people would think a minute or two about it before dismissing it. I am not circumcised but the entire issue is one that's pretty close to me. It seems like it reflects societies view of men pretty well though. Disposable, not that important, should be sacrificed for the amusement of others. I wrote a text once making the entire thing gender neutral. It wasn't boys or girls but infants and children, it wasn't penises or vaginas it was genitals. People were upset when I said th…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 10:14 AM
0

I thought a big point of men's rights is to show that it's not just SJWs who are the problem. I stay away from tumblr so I rarely have to deal with stuff like that but I see more and more of this in " the real world". Emma's speech was pretty much pissing in the face of the men she used as examples and those with similar problems. This post perfectly shows how blind she and other feminists are to how the real world works. She didn't slander men, she expressed a preference, one that clearly shows…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 10:04 AM
2

That's another thing, people claim that issues of equality have never been more important than now. I'd say (especially with Russia acting up and the Ebola outbreak and Isis) that it has never really been less important than now. We have never been more equal, we have never had so little violent crime, we have never had so few deadly diseases, and percentage wise the poor have never been so well of. The last one is for my own country, I don't know how it is in the rest of the world though. In sh…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 09:49 AM
9

Mutilate: to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts. Disfigure: to mar the appearance or beauty of; deform;deface Deform: to mar the natural form or shape of; put outof shape; disfigure We know that circumcision removes a significant amount of nerves and we know it has a function, both sexual and functional. Amputation of the foreskin whether surgical or with a rusty knife is mutilation of the penis. It deforms the penis (see dict.def. above) and in my opi…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:38 AM
35

I'm not saying that there aren't parts of the world where women have serious problems. This is the whole issue, women do face serious problems all over the world but the thing is, so do men. All women don't face issues though, nor do all men. What bothers me about all this is that there are human beings who suffer in this world. It's not hatred against women or hatred against men (although that actually is a growing issue) it's some individuals who justify actively hurting others. In the end it'…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:30 AM
1

Women as a group makes less money from work than men do, but this really says nothing about anything. It does not take into account different types of work, or different types of companies within the same type if work etc. Also a lot of people's salaries are based on their own negotiations for them. And finally there is the whole maternity leave and stuff like that where women are the ones who most often forego work in order to care for the children etc. All of this comes down to personal choice…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:25 AM
1

Seriously, wtf was I thinking with that color choice? I realize it was a rhetorical question but I'll answer anyways. You were thinking that different colors for different people would make it easier to differentiate between them. You just didn't care what color represented what person, not everything has a deeper meaning.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:08 AM
3

I'm not entirely sure she was trying to make one in the first place though.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 05:03 AM
8

I managed to get about halfway through the whole thing before I gave up. There is so much word vomit in this article I can smell it all the way through my screen. Scrolling down I got the reason though: Jennifer Doyle is the author of Hold It Against Me: Difficulty and Emotion in Contemporary Art and Sex Objects: Art and the Dialectics of Desire. She is a Professor of English at the University of California, Riverside and the author of the blog The Sport Spectacle. There is no connection to anyt…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 09:08 PM
11

I can really see why people have a problem with this speech, at the same time I see it as some sort of first step. Sure it's too little too late but it's still something that can be used. Read /u/defgh's post further down for a clear reason of why this can be seen as really bothersome. when [men] are free, things will change for women as a natural consequence. Implicitly, she's saying who gives a fuck about mens' gender freedom? freeing women is the important part. In other words, if helping men…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 08:48 PM
1

Thank you for doing this AMA, it's always interesting to hear about the experiences of transpeople (is that the preferred term?) especially since the specific situation is basically proof of my own views on gender and sexes. It's also interesting to hear about the world from different perspectives and experiences. I have noticed a lot of transpeople and gay men on here for a while and I'm always interested in their take on the sub and the movement as a whole. Especially given the image that mens…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 08:31 AM
4

"Whether it's a cartoon image or a photograph, any representation of underage people's genitals is illegal under the Criminal Code Have you been to a museum and watched classical paintings from the 15-1800's? Cupid is often depicted as a naked child, I know several statues in my city where small childrens penises are clearly visible. Should these be destroyed? Should we burn every painting where the age of the naked person portrayed is debatable? In Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, Juliet is thir…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 11:53 AM
11

but no one ever understands that can't be forced. Well not with that attitude! /s
/r/MensRights10/09/14 12:24 AM
2

So the only examples given of female comic book characters are Wonder Woman, Poison Ivy, and Cat Woman? I'm not a big comic book reader but I'm sure there are more and better examples out there right? Clark Kent is only a nerd in acting only, I mean he still has all them muscles underneath his office suit (and his super suit). Peter Parker I'm not so sure about but I assume that his physique is fairly chiseled as well under his regular clothes (and I assume he wears his spidey suit underneath hi…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:46 PM
1

I'm not looking for more ammo for arguments, I just want to know how to deal with morons like him. You don't, you show them your side and if they won't even consider it then you are arguing with a brick wall... it's not gonna let you through regardless of how good or true your arguments are. You just don't dignify him with a response the next time he writes.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:03 PM
5

I remember seeing a great picture of this where a man in a suit sits next to a hobo (I think) on a park bench and you see their thought bubbles. The man in the suit is thinking of a whole bunch of stuff and different people and I even think there was a rainbow there. The hobo thinks that the man in the suit is thinking all kinds of bad things about him though.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:36 PM
2

On the one hand, she actually wanted a barbershop cut on her hair, on the other hand, there can't possibly be a shortage of places to have your hair cut in the area either. I know plenty of places that specialize in cutting womens hair and while they won't outright refuse you, they will definitely point you to a place better suited for your needs. In the end I believe that he has the right to specialize in cutting only the hair of men, it will limit his clientèle but that should be his choice.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:38 PM
1

There you go. Wish I'd read that before typing out my last paragraph. Ha! sorry about that.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:44 PM
5

How about creating and possessing child pornography? I mean if he admits this video as evidence he could technically be charged for that right?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:23 PM
1

also not all crashes come from risky driving (most accidents happen on streets very near to the driver's home, going at relatively low speeds). not all rape comes from risky behavior. Not paying attention because you have driven on the same street for 5+ years is risky driving, not paying attention period is risky driving, regardless of when. That being said I see your point about it all, and I think I conceded that the burglar and lock/alarm thing is a much better analogy. okay, but in this com…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:14 PM
1

you do teach people how not to cause accidents. You do have nation-wide campaigns to teach people not to drink and drive. You do send people to "drive better schools". We also spend a lot of time during our growing up period etc being taught that rape is bad, it's a crime, we shouldn't do it, society doesn't condone rape contrary to what these people seem to believe. Rape is not considered a "cool" thing to do. All the while looking before you cross the road is taught because it's a simple thing…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:40 PM
1

Even in poor and icy conditions it's still the driver who chooses to maneuver the vehicle in these highly risky conditions, and it's also the driver who decides to maneuver the vehicle in a risky way (most notably at too high speeds relating to the conditions and skill level) and may not always keep proper awareness, i.e eyes on the road etc. Accidents happen, but they are much less likely to happen to people who actually do things to minimize the risks, and this can be done without sacrificing …
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:31 PM
2

Well you hear the same kind of stuff in Sweden. Oh women didn't have the vote until this and this year, and men could vote since so and so many years back and when women had the vote that's when voting was an actual right to all people. Well the thing is that in Sweden women were never disallowed to vote, the requirement for voting was at first the owning of a specific amount of money and or land. Basically what you paid in taxes would determine how many votes you got. Also voting was related to…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:02 AM
0

It's funny because as a young man I was told specifically not to rape, even after the clear obvious fact was stated that rape is one of those things that is wrong. In telling me specifically not to rape I had to draw the conclusion that there was some inherent part of me that would always strive towards rape, that I had to consciously suppress it every waking moment. I spent a huge part of my childhood being afraid of that part of me, that part that was exclusively connected to me being male of …
/r/MensRights27/08/14 07:44 PM
1

Fair enough, I see what you are saying, I may have been a little to harsh in writing "core" so I will kind of yield to that... but only kind of. To me the notion of "patriarchy theory" is kind of offensive... well not really offensive, I find it repulsive but I take no personal offense from it. To my knowledge "patriarchy theory" is one of the fundamental principles of academic feminism, pretty much everything is viewed through its lens. I would say that while maybe not the core it is definitely…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:35 PM
3

European here, I was actually taught in school that the foreskin is just a bit of protective skin and nothing more, at least they got the protective part right. I never knew anything of the real functions and actual benefits of it. After finding reddit and hearing about the high density of nerves I started to experiment and actually pay attention when mastrubating. I found that what I had been taught, that the glans was the most sensitive part was not right at all (wich is logical since that par…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:41 AM
10

You have adopted an ideology that I do not agree with, this ideology speaks volumes about your stance and your thoughts about the world. I do not agree with this ideology, in fact I find many of it's teachings morally wrong, yet you stand there proudly acknowledging your full support of this ideology and all that it stands for. How can I not disslike you from what I already know? Worth noting that I'm talking to a hypothetical person here not you Apemazzle. Name this ideology feminism, or Islam,…
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:07 PM
2

But patriachy isn't about men it's about previously established gender roles and other bullshit... right... yeah... and pigs learn to fly in Santas new winter home over in hell.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 11:27 PM
2

Well I was advised to not manually force an ejaculation (no masturbation or sex or any similar thing, what happens when asleep is out of your control though) for at least one but up to two weeks after the procedure. I walked funny for a while after but it was no big deal, maybe a bit sensitive so just make sure you can take it easy for a while. Sex resumed after about a week and a half for me and I took it easy for the next two weeks. After that everything was right as rain again and I could pou…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 11:24 PM
3

Even someone who still calls themselves feminist should be open enough to see that even if that is what "they" think that feminism is about, that is not what feminism does. In that persons words there must be very few "real" feminists in the feminist movement, it has long since passed the point where a majority of actual active feminists are the "bad" kind and thus become the defining factor of the movement. But again, feminism was never about taking men's views and experiences into account, not…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 11:13 PM
1

I just want my karma back ;_; Sorry man but that's what you get when you quote an unpopular definition without a source. Dictionaries are fickle I know that (the merriam webster for example has changed it's definition since 2011 to something similar to what you posted) which is why I included several of them, and wikipedia was just to mention where I got my quote, their source was also mentioned. Wikipedia is not always reliable, but when it's using decent sources it is. The thing is that only r…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:37 PM
2

Shit man... that girl is serious trouble and sadly there is no way you can get him to see this, he has to realize this on his own. Just make sure (if you really feel up for it) that he knows you still think of him as family and that if he ever needs a place to go you are there for him. I would not be surprised if she turns all abusive on him and he may be to blind to even realize it.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:28 PM
2

How exactly did she cost him his job?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:47 PM
5

The primary definition for feminism has always been "equality for women" or something along those lines. from the oxford dictionary: The advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. From wikipedia: Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women. (The sources are the 2011 merriam webster online dictionary and the online cambrige dictionary from 2011) The …
/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:31 PM
15

Well since they seem to think of everything as a zero sum game, their own "logic" would make it so. One cannot be empowered unless the other suffers. It's bullshit through and through, but hey, I suppose we already knew that right.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 06:15 PM
11

dropbox man, make sure that shit get's uploaded right away.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:42 PM
2

For some reason I like her much better with her clothes on. But, and I shouldn't really have to do this, mad props to you for hooking your guy up with stuff like that. I had a girl who liked to do this to me, didn't matter much what she sent it was the fact that she sent it and I knew why... it was hot as hell and I loved every minute of it.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:23 PM
2

she'd have used a frying pan. wait, what?
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:18 PM
1

It is? I don't recall ever hearing something like that... must be the translation to English that makes it hard for me to pinpoint. Vad säger vi på svenska?
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:10 PM
6

You know, why can't people just get to be who they are huh? A partner that wants to change you doesn't love you for who you are and they probably never will. Move on and don't look back. I have a cynical view of this article and a bit more "open minded" one too, cynical goes first. These husbands that were so "androgynous" who were left by their wives, do doubt with alimony and having to pay for the children while their wives were away with some bad boy toy were conflicted when their wives wante…
/r/MensRights16/08/14 07:03 PM
2

Is the quote ridiculous? Yes! Does context make it more factual? No! I can understand that she may not have meant it "that way" but that doesn't make it less dumb, regardless of the situation. Trying to raise morale like that through lies and bad phrasing is not a good idea, at the very least it's not a good speech. I do not judge Hillary on this, it is only one speech from long ago and I don't know more about her sentiment in these issues. Still, true quote is ridiculous, and IMO context doesn'…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 09:43 AM
6

I don't use Twitter (or whatever platform this is) so I'm not that familiar with how to interpret these things at all, what with the "@" and "#" and whatnot. I have however seen enough of these kinds of images to enable me to understand the post... Even though it took me about three minutes to work it out.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:38 AM
1

This is what I was getting at, movies don't dictate society they draw inspiration from it. When the discussion about women as protagonists in movies and how women are portrayed comes up I find that it's no more impossible than what the rest of the movie portrays. The reason why there are more men and male protagonists is found in looking at the role they're playing. They are often the protectors or warriors in one way or the other. Now sure there are women in these roles too but it's not that co…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:50 AM
2

What Hollywood needs is for fewer people to take what happens in fictional movies as an indication about real life. What happens in an action movie is a fantasy that many people like but few would actually like to experience. That's why we watch movies in the first place, to experience things we cannot and in many cases would not want to in real life. People are bound to be heightened in regards to pretty much every aspect because why not? They still jump from exploding buildings with nigh a scr…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 06:45 AM
4

In what way is Gamora not a female power fantasy? She's a beautiful, (albeit green) smart, powerful, independent woman who is strong enough to admit that she can always use the help of the friends she just made. Look, a woman who is just a hot body I can kind of agree is just there for her body, but don't tell me girls who watch that don't at some point wish they had that body themselves. Having that body means having more sexual power over men and thus having more power yourself. However Gamora…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:20 PM
7

She's actually saying that being a bitch is the opposite to being a lover (in this context I take it as a romantically loving and all around good person), given that the other statements are each other's opposites. So yeah, not really about being strong or independent.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:09 PM
7

Give it some time and then start to push the agenda. He will be just as dead in a few months time, sadly.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:31 PM
3

Overarching relationship between men and women I believe in equal worth not equal value, allow me to explain. A persons value is a measure of the amount of "good" they can achieve in a given scenario (per my definition it should be mentioned). If you are on a boat in the middle of the sea, a person with experience and ability in similar situations will be of more value than a person who doesn't. In this case a persons value can fluctuate greatly depending on the situation and the growth of said …
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:18 AM
2

I found this out the good way recently. A girl I know wore a tight tank top and a bra that clearly showed the outline of her nipples poking through. I found this extremely alluring to watch since I was attracted to her and I stole the odd glance without her noticing. A few days later we hooked up FWB style and a few days into that I tell her about the time with the nipples and what does she say? That was her intended reaction all along. I felt like a simple fish who took the bait hook line and s…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:20 AM
1

The truth is that women spend their entire lives passing through a gauntlet of penises in various degrees of erection and men spend their entire lives slipping through a tunnel of vaginas in various degrees of lubrication. That's a mental image for you...
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:57 PM
1

The truth is that women spend their entire lives passing through a gauntlet of penises in various degrees of erection and men spend their entire lives slipping through a tunnel of vaginas in various degrees of lubrication. That's a mental image for you...
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:57 PM
2

Whoa... I doubt it would do any actual change in feminists, but maybe one or two might open their eyes.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:19 PM
4

The higher instances of (brace yourself here): mental illness, heart disease, prostate cancer, poverty, archaic laws regarding parental rights and responsibilities, suicide (related but not entirely to mental illness), homelessness, being subjected to violence, and genital mutilation (you can see that as infringement upon the bodily autonomy of infants if it makes you more comfortable). There is also the more exclusive points of conscription (registering for selective service) and the draft now …
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:06 PM
1

I do see your point and it would all be well and true if it wasn't for the fact that "benefits" or circumcision have been used in order to cement it's standing as common practice. Talk to any American who hasn't really thought about the procedure at all and ask why they think it's done and they will say something about it's supposed benefits. Debunking the "benefits" of circumcision have been relevant since before there even was a debate about it. Why? Because talking about the supposed benefits…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 06:46 PM
5

Why are men supposed to cut their bodies to suit women's wishes? They aren't, and I thought that was pretty much a given considering which sub I'm writing in. The thing is, I like to debunk statements on the same ground in which they were laid out. My point was that the statement that circumcised men preform better (in general) was not only untrue but there is statistical evidence that it's actually the other way around. edit: Besides, you also hurt and alienate circumcised men with that argumen…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 02:37 PM
22

What the ever loving fuck? First of all there is a lot of statistics that show intact men actually preform much better in bed, more women report orgasm and are generally more satisfied. How is this not a human rights violation of the highest degree? While I don't agree with it at all, the case is often made about children and the parents deciding over them. These are adults who decide over themselves legally... I... I don't even... I would love to hear the reaction about this news from feminists…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:18 AM
2

I'm guessing it's because grown men aren't eager to chop part of their penis off when it doesn't even spare them having to use condoms. Yeah I never understood how someone would voluntarily have their penises cut to protect from HIV yet still have to use condoms, that oddly enough seems to be working better at protecting from HIV. Something is fucked up about the whole thing and I'm a little afraid of what it might be.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:06 AM
1

Why? You hold no responsibility over the actions of others who just happen to share similar type genitals. You are your own person and thus responsible only for your actions and maybe those of your child or pet (if you have one) but you should not feel ashamed for the actions of others. I can fully understand that you do though, because I have done the same on my end (male) but I decided that it wasn't helping anyone to do so.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:42 PM
3

Say no to vertical videos
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:26 PM
1

You showed clearly that you did not consent, even in your drunken state, you were sexually assaulted and violated. You were not however raped which would involve actual intercourse or genital contact (or genital to oral contact). I will not give any kind of legal advice since I'm not in a good position to do that, but you should see what kind of help you can get to get through this. Learn from this and try to take greater care with whom you get intoxicated with in the future.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:21 PM
2

I know the way I dress is kind of provocative but that does not mean I should have to deal with it. In other words "I should not have to take responsibility for my actions". I don't get this video, a lot of the "catcalls" is just men showing appreciation for the women they find attractive. And what everyone else here is saying, these are not exactly your run of the mill neighborhoods. Anything that deviates from the norm there would probably be called out in some way.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:05 PM
5

This is scary... how can he reference studies in one point and then claim that the same studies were ended prematurely? How can you draw conclusions from studies that were not completed in the first place? That is not scientific that is just stupid. Also why get circumcised if you still need to use condoms? Did they even have a third group to check uncircumcised males who practiced safe sex? it appears to be no more difficult to get an uncircumcised male to use condoms as a circumcised one, why …
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:05 PM
3

Here you go! Don't let the fact that the website looks like it's from 1998 fool you, this is recent and up to date research. In this unprecedented undertaking, a total of 42 scholars and 70 research assistants at 20 universities and research institutions spent two years or more researching their topics and writing the results. Approximately 12,000 studies were considered and more than 1,700 were summarized and organized into tables. The 17 manuscripts, which provide a review of findings on each …
/r/MensRights01/08/14 06:40 AM
3

Because when circumcision became something other that religious, when it became about deterring the "unclean" practice of masturbation it became medical. In order to convince people to have the procedure done they had to convince them that removing the foreskin is not only something good but that it does no harm to the children. I can only imagine that a similar rhetoric was used in the early times of Judaism to convince people to circumcise their sons, aside with the whole "god says to do it" t…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:52 PM
2

The definition needs to be taken back from its overpopulated use, a pedophile is one who is attracted to prepubescent children regardless of actual age or sex. A Hebiphile is a person attracted to people in the early to mid stages of puberty, and Ephebophilia is the attraction to people in the later stages of puberty (15/16 - 19). And in actuality what really matters is not how many people are pedophiles but how many act on it. I'm attracted to women, but that doesn't mean that I will be attract…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:39 PM
20

That's because men -- aside from being craven, unevolved creatures and bumbling fools -- are essentially invincible and, like Superman, bullets bounce off our eyeballs. Of course! Do you mean to say that you are not? I guess you are not a real man then. /S
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:27 PM
11

If a scrawny little guy hits a guy who's way bigger than him he knows that there will be retaliation. If I have time I will assess the strength of my opponent and respond accordingly though but there will be pain. Welcome to equality, this is what you asked for now suck it up and take it like the women you keep saying you are. I also think these women (save for Whoopi) have just a bit too high thoughts about the defensive capabilities of men and too low thoughts about a womans offensive capabili…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:24 PM
2

I suppose you live in the US? I have one question, do you believe in religious freedom? Is your opinion that everyone has the right to believe in whichever god or whatever that they want to believe in? Do you believe that everyone has the right to preform their own religious rites and ceremonies so long as they do not break any laws? If you believe in this, why would you not extend the same courtesy to your son? Why would you force the permanent mark of your religion upon him before he can make …
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:46 AM
2

Whoa, whoa, whoa, Disney and it's gender representations is one big can of worms to open up, tread lightly there. I agree with /u/sean_robinson132 that this is getting to Sarkeesean levels with the interpretations ans whatnot. Look, Disney movies has pretty much always been about the girls and women and "princesses". All you have to do is look at the lineup, Snow white, Cinderella, Belle, Ariel, Alice (technically not a princess but what the hell), Aurora (sleeping beauty). In the early films th…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:56 PM
3

It was a reference to a scenario and an example of equality that we should strive towards. It being fictional has no bearing at all.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:52 AM
1

Thank you! was raking my brain for this name.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:30 AM
7

The MRM is a collection of individuals who wish to discuss and work for mens rights, this means that there is no real ideology behind the MRM other than helping men who need help. Feminism is a philosophy, an ideology, and a socio-political movement whose only goal now is to further itself in it's hierarchical standing. Don't confuse individual feminists with feminism itself though, they may be few and rarely heard from but there are individual feminists who actually do care about "real" equalit…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:46 PM
8

Reminds me of an old Greek tale where the women withheld sex from their husbands until they stopped waging war... I don't really remember that much of it but I think it was along those lines at least. I also think it kind of backfired too, not sure.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:21 PM
3

Refreshing as in I have never really ever seen this side brought up before, even by other people (aside from here of course). Sure there are publications about things like this but they are largely invisible, this is "the times", a rather notable publication. To have someone openly call out the hypocrisy of the whole "violence against women" in a major publication like this, it's positive and it's new (for me at least) so I think refreshing is a pretty good way to describe it. Of course the issu…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:07 PM
2

How refreshing to read.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:51 AM
2

This is one of those things that women can never really understand. There is never any doubt as to who is the mother but never any certainty as to the father, there is always room for some doubt. It may not be all that common with cuckolded fathers but it's far from uncommon.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:59 AM
1

This is something that is fully possible (and I believe it's true as well) but it's kinda hard to prove since we can't get more reliable data on the past than what we have now.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:07 AM
1

Well I'm sure many will disagree (and I can't say that I have spent much time there just trying to get an opinion) but as I see it the goal of TRP is for it's followers to be able to attract women (and sleep with). To achieve this they must feel better about themselves and to do that they must actually better themselves. I think this is the most honorable part of it all since the focus is on personal improvement. Sure the goal may be to be able to get laid better but I see this as a "means justi…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:05 AM
3

Precisely!
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:18 PM
25

They share some common topics of discussion and view of the world but that's as far as it goes from what I can see. The goals and cores of both movements are inherently different though.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:49 PM
2

Quick info about FGM: There are four types: Type 1a, removal of the clitoral hood or prepuce only; Type 1b, removal of the clitoris with the prepuce. Type 2a, removal of the labia minora only; Type 2b, partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora; Type 2c, partial or total removal of the clitoris, the labia minora and the labia majora. Type 3a, removal and apposition of the labia minora; Type 3b, removal and apposition of the labia majora. This is also known as infibulation wher…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:35 PM
16

Secular coalition of America charging white males $99 for secular summit and lobby day. Women and minorities get in for free. Or how to create an echo chamber with minimal effort.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:17 PM
1

These are some really interesting stats actually and I can only come up with two likely conclusions (excluding conspiracy which is always a conclusion although not always likely), either men under report over time as typhonblue states or the violence against men has drastically increased in the last few years. This really should be studied further.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:13 PM
1

I know if I ever met the doctor who did it I might punch them. Maybe not as simple but why don't you sue them instead? (hypothetical question I know it's not really likely to go through but it would send a message)
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:55 PM
1

In the event of a war there cannot be too much canon fodder I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:48 PM
5

Well he just learned that things like this can happen to a man, what he hasn't yet realized is that it not only can but actually is happening to plenty of men already. He doesn't realize that violence against women is not systemic in a general sense (meaning it can be systemic in individual cases but most often isn't) especially when actually compared to violence against men. Violence against women is never represented with a side to compare it to leaving most people to assume that the other sid…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:37 PM
1

I think the biggest drawback is that they are not intended for repeated use. At least not that much IIRC, I haven't tried them since I bought a fleshlight instead (works awesome btw)
/r/MensRights10/06/14 12:21 PM
2

That study probably uses police reports or similar as a source, and in those cases 2-5% may very well be true given the whole duluth model that seemingly all agencies use today. Given the probability that you may be the one arrested if you call in your own abuse (if you are a man) that obviously skews the results. Also the name of that source doesn't really scream credibility to me... but that's just my gut. Given time I may well check up on the source myself.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 11:56 PM
15

There is a saying that goes : "the opportunity makes the thief" and that is pretty much what is described here. The "thief" is still a criminal and the "victim" is still a victim but the situation could have been avoided by looking at the risks of ones behavior. We don't teach people not to steal, we teach people to lock their doors and cars. But wait, we do teach people not to steal, it's part of the whole "right and wrong" thing you learn when you grow up. It's the same with rape, assault, mur…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:04 PM
12

What source are they citing? Perhaps you could direct them here some quotes: Overall, 24% of individuals assaulted by a partner at least once in their lifetime (23% for females and 19.3% for males) Higher victimization for male than female high school students Lifetime rates higher among women than men Past year rates somewhat higher among men Overall, 25.3% of individuals have perpetrated IPV Rates of female-perpetrated violence higher than male-perpetrated (28.3% vs. 21.6%) Wide range in perpe…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:52 PM
5

I do not speak for other MRA's but I do speak for me and I pretty much agree with your point. Teaching your child to be respectful towards others is your duty as a parent regardless of the gender of the child. Teaching males that they need to respect women will only tell them that women are weaker and in need of special attention, what do you think they will do with that message when they grow up? Do you think that will make them see women as equals? Teaching girls to not dress provocatively is …
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:41 PM
1

Even so, I'm pretty much perpetually horny and feel strong sexual attraction to plenty of women, but I would have no problem admitting that even the most sexy and beautiful of women were to come on to me that would not ensure my consent and willingness. I don't just want to sleep with anyone, I could, but I don't want to and that's what it's all about. I'm not gonna pretend that I'm a majority on this because I really doubt that I am, I'm sure there are loads of men who don't really want to have…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:18 PM
2

yup, but all to true. It's hard to find unbiased information about pre Victorian life, at least in the areas and details that I'm looking at. But I did see a documentary about how it was not uncommon for women to be in charge of their own plantations or mansions or handle their husbands businesses when they were away or unable. The thing is that there is no real paper evidence of this IIRC, since the signature had to be the man's because they had all the responsibility. The same with old kings a…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:53 AM
4

isn't this already done in the law text? They are not considered old enough to make an informed decision about their consent, alternatively that they are more susceptible to being manipulated. There is a vast difference between individuals when it comes to this though, but since there is no real way to measure stuff like that an age of consent was decided upon. Maybe you meant why one sex should have one age and the other sex a different age.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:45 AM
2

Here's a tip. If you discover that you're gay and you want to sleep around allot give some thought to getting circumcised using condoms. FTFY
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:08 AM
3

The Victorian era was a shitstain on our history, it is there that much of the vilification of sex comes into play and probably the birth time of our more "strict" gender roles. Before the Victorian era it was common to see women working in mines with the men (though not really the same positions) then that whole deal was put to a stop. Women were not allowed to work in the mines under such contidions and for the sake of decency. Having women working with their bare upper bodies could reduce the…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:56 PM
14

I still keep wondering how men can say this, do they all have ED? (the men who say/think this I mean) I mean boners happen constantly when you don't want it, I thought every biological male with a functioning penis knew this already. And again when it comes to children under the age of consent their feelings about the matter should not have anything to do with the point or we might just do away with the whole age of consent thing altogether. An adult is expected to know that it is illegal to hav…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:40 PM
7

Men's rights, unlike feminism, do not claim to be the only bastion of discussing the rights of men. Okay it was a rather unnecessary jab at feminism but there is a lot of truth to it. What we want is for people to think about and talk about men's rights issues whether they are feminists, liberals, environmentalists, accountants, Jewish, Buddhist, conservatives, or whatever their political/religious/other beliefs are. You are not an MRA just because you care about men's rights! Even redpillers, w…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:46 AM
3

Wow that was comedy gold and some really solid points, this guy is good!
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:26 AM
3

Yeah who's that remind you of... Mandy Patinkin?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 09:13 PM
1

It's a big generalization of many things but I believe the cdc was linked recently. I'm on mobile so I can't cite any specific sources on this though. The help thing is derived from watching society at large plus the several videos and accounts where women (actors) attack men (actors). I'll see what I can dig up if I get time.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:38 PM
2

Women are less likely to experience any kind of assault in public (save for cat calling maybe) and they are more likely to receive help should a situation arise. Why are they afraid?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:56 AM
1

In other words "what anyone with at least minimal insight into the social circle of high school girls already knew"! While it's great that people recognize "all purpose insults" and how they are used this has been known for ages by a lot of people.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:42 AM
11

It is changing... ever so slowly but it is changing. Men are starting to speak up, starting to tell their stories, starting to be visible. I think we may have waited a little too long though so it's going to be uphill for a while, but as soon as we can be considered human beings too things will get rapidly better. I hope at least!
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:12 PM
1

You ask them to think about it some more and ask if they see why they actually lost. They won the battle but lost the war.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:48 AM
1

My swimmers are safely locked up inside my balls, and there they will remain, no matter what.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:28 AM
12

athletic, muscular look that I can't resist. Amen! And while I consider myself straight I think there is something insanely attractive about a well toned and fit body, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:17 PM
1

Isn't that pretty much what I said? "A better deal for men" Is a great statement and all but it's not really saying anything consequential.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:36 PM
3

The goal of MRM is not equality, now hear me out before you jump to conclusions. The goal of the MRM is to spread awareness of men's suffering and the issues that men face. It is to promote the rights of men that they justly deserve but do not have. It is about offering the other side of the social narrative that women are oppressed by men and pointing out the fallacies of that narrative. I'm sure there are more but these are what I have come to see as the biggest ones. Lastly and probably most …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:39 AM
3

There are already "cybernanny" programs available for parents to put on the family computer etc. I'm not aware of any such apps for smartphones or tablets though. Look you were not abused by porn, by that logic a kid who got their hands on alcohol or cigarettes when underage would be abused by them too, that's not how it works. I too saw a lot of porn as a young kid but I also saw plenty of messages of me having to be 18 in order to enter the sites etc. I choose full well to ignore this and get …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:52 AM
5

I think we have to start thinking about another comeback to these statements since it apparently fails to get the message across. There are intrusive people around, when I start to think about it I find that there are plenty of women who do similar things as described by the women that men do. You are bound to run in to an asshole or two if you live a relatively standard life, assholes tend to get around and be noticed. What if you tried to notice every kind gesture, every person who showed you …
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:34 PM
3

Yeah, that was what I meant, I suppose I should have been clearer.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:38 PM
1

I'm going to do a boo boo here and equate feminism and women because it'll be easier to describe that way. Women have been "backseat drivers" throughout most of history. This meant they had an invisible influence over a great deal of things depending on their social level. A wife could influence her husband in many ways, it's true today and was true then too. When the king was away the queen signed all the papers and fulfilled his duties at home, but she signed his name. He had the responsibilit…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:37 PM
9

In short the image is saying that as a man you bear the responsibility of the actions of those who look like you. Not cool!
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:14 PM
2

Well I'm only saying that I'm open to the idea, I haven't actually had sex with my friends. I know both men and women who think both ways in this issue. There is also a lot of talk and little action among those who say they want it this way. In the end I think it's an inherent difference in all of us. I can separate sex and passion from love and romance (most of the time) others can't or won't.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:42 AM
2

Ah, yes there is a subtle difference in actively wanting to sleep with someone and being willing should the possibility arise. I'm the latter, and I do think a lot of men are. I have a fairly big libido and thoroughly enjoy sex in most aspects so I would say that I would sleep with most women given that they want it too of course. The thing about my friends is that I know them already and I like them a lot (otherwise they wouldn't be my friends). There is a caveat though and that is that the gro…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:10 AM
1

You know there are figures upon figures, research upon research, articles upon articles, etc... about how women face violence of different kinds and how prevalent it is. I have yet to see a the counter statistic for men though. How can you make it a gendered issue when you only have one side? Research clearly show (and has for about 40 years) that men are just as likely as women to suffer from domestic abuse. Yet it is never talked about, there are no shelters for men, there are no helplines, th…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:23 PM
1

Yikes, this again! When all the school shootings happened it was video games and what Marylin Manson that was the cause, now it's misogyny? Geez! Take a look around at what is said about men nowadays, men are violent, men are killers, men are evil, men are rapists, men have all the privilege, men act violent because they like it, men feel entitled to womens bodies, men have no problems worth discussing at all. Then think what kind of message that sends to a confused and disturbed and frustrated …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:22 PM
5

Hello and welcome! How does it feel from a male perspective? Is it hard to talk to any girl because of the assumption that somehow because you are talking on her you are hitting on her? It used to be like that, now it's even more along that path though. Striking up a conversation with a woman is "invading" her private space, and it displays "my feelings of entitlement to her attention" and my only driving force behind the encounter is my libido. Okay those examples are a bit hyperbolic but whene…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:34 PM
2

that wasn't about my Vibram FiveFingers. Best icebreaker ever, I don't know how many people have randomly started conversations with me since I started wearing those.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:01 PM
1

If I exterminated all dogs, I would never have to worry about getting bitten by one again. Pity about all the nice pets, but meh, think of the bite victims! That's all what I mean by it being rational. I must not have the same understanding of the word rational as you do. To me such an act is irrationally severe given the actual risk, the losses in such a situation far outweigh the gains IMO. If you live life fearing all people you'll hurt yourself more than if you just let that fear go. In our …
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:59 PM
27

I don't think we can ever be really sure of what group has it worse, and in the end it doesn't really matter. The important point is that those who need receive the help they can get. I can understand the need for people to have confirmed that they are treated poorly because of gender (or race, religion, sexuality, or whatever) instead of who they are as people or just out of bad luck. It gives a sense of power and belonging at the same time as it gives a tangible explanation. You can't do anyth…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:59 AM
1

And I disagree back. Being afraid of everyone is only beneficial if 50% or more of that population aims to harm you or pose a real threat. In the example of dogs it would only be reasonable to be afraid of all dogs if you had proof that 50% or more of them would attack you unprovoked.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:35 AM
1

It's the common treatment for when a tight foreskin becomes problematic here, that is unless stretching and steroid cream hasn't been at least suggested first hand (and I do suggest you look in to that as a possible option). From what I know what they do is make a small incision in the foreskin effectively making the opening wider and thus not as tight anymore. I don't know how long the healing time is but there should be very little adverse effects from the procedure. The good part is that you …
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:27 PM
1

Honestly what sealed the deal (brought me here and made me realize there was an actual movement) was circumcision and the whole debacle about that. I have probably been of the MR "mentality" since I was around 6-7 years old thought. I remember when I first heard of feminism and wondered what the equivalent for men was called, and never really got an answer. Since then I have been slightly wondering about that side off and on when it comes to gender issues. I have also pretty much always wanted t…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:10 PM
8

If you are bitten by a dog, are you wrong for then fearing dogs? Yes! Or rather, there is no actual basis for your fear, it's irrational and you should realize and understand that it is so. Being afraid isn't wrong per se since most fears are rather irrational. But if you don't acknowledge this you have taken the first step down a spiral of destructive emotions. I was thrown of a horse once, and I got hurt pretty bad, since then I was afraid to get back up in the saddle again but I knew this was…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:48 PM
3

This was done by an utterly disturbed person first and foremost, I think everyone should remember that. One does not simply willingly take the life of another human, since it goes against a deeply ingrained moral code. There is even research on the huge impact this has on soldiers in war. This man would probably have gone on a killing spree even if he wasn't overly bitter towards women in particular. The fact that he was so bitter towards women only gave him a more specific target.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:01 PM
2

More people should see this! It's a great initiative from those who made it.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:06 PM
1

What you wear is your silent statement to the world, something that often say something about you. It can be more or less prominent and more or less accurate but it still conveys a message. This is true regardless of your intentions or how much/little you like it. If you wear a nice suit and carry a nice briefcase people will make assumptions of you, and they are right to do so. If you display sexual characteristics (cleavage, cameltoe, yogapants-butt, codpiece) in your clothes and how you wear …
/r/MensRights23/05/14 11:35 AM
7

Not fair that it's more socially-acceptable to hit men? Beat women. A common misconception about what is often said on here. Mostly someone brings up an example to demonstrate the huge double standard in society's views on violence and gender. This is actually quite important since it explains why we never rarely hear about violence against men. Not fair that male workplace deaths are higher than women's? Deregularize traditional women's jobs or do away with workplace comp for women entirely. We…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 08:55 PM
1

Also, we all were kids, so I don't want to discriminate anyway. I don't discriminate, I just don't like children and prefer, respectfully, to not be around them when I can. So if I were moved away from a child in a plane I would be offended by the implication but at the same time realising that it was kind of a win for me. Having been a kid myself doesn't mean that any bad behavior I had at that time was justified. Someone behaving badly is a negative experience regardless of what reasons they h…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 07:05 AM
2

yeah, me too. My point is that the thought behind the regulation is pretty "toxic" to use a buzzword. That's what I consider unfair. I too would gladly move if I was seated next to a kid.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:31 AM
2

Yup, that's me! I have my main account which I can tell my friends about if I wish, then I have my NSFW account, and then I have this one, for posting here and for saying what I truly think about things etc. Not that I really care that someone would look into my history, but I like to keep this part of my Internet persona separate from my physical self.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:26 AM
2

What you do with this information is up to you. This is the misunderstood beauty of raw data. It doesn't really mean or say anything other than what is stated, it can't really be misunderstood since there only data. Now when interpreting the data and making statements from that, this is when it gets warped. I think it would be awesome if all reported studies could have a raw data-sheet for people to look into. Then we have that the studies actually say, and not what some journalist claims that t…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:22 AM
1

The "seriously though" was an implication that I was joking in the earlier statement. The mentality is not harmful when I am aware of the general damage the issue causes but I realize that that I personally can benefit from the situation.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:08 AM
104

Joke's on them, I hate sitting next to kids on the plane. Seriously though this is unfair to both the woman who's forced to sit next to the kid and the man who has to move. Shit is what it is.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 10:11 AM
1

I wouldn't say problematic, but educated people are the biggest threat to pretty much any kind of extremism. This is of course based on that the education is free from political governing. The more educated people are, the less they take any propaganda at face value, given that the propaganda is not part of the education. But then the education wouldn't be free from political control.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 03:55 PM
2

Would you like a study that opens several doors in to the labour market? Sure let's see what jobs this can give us then... Career prospects and further studies Jobs: Candidates who hold a Master's degree in Gender Studies are most commonly found in these industries: Voluntary organisations: Project Coordinator, Special Adviser, Programme Coordinator… Public administration: Adviser, Principal Consultant, Research Coordinator... Teaching: Secondary School Teacher, Lecturer, Subject Adviser... Yeah…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:45 PM
2

I do love it when someone knows about the etymology of words we use and don't just assume that because "hey look it says "man" so it mus mean what "man" mean today" or something like that.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:33 PM
1

funniest one IMO. A bitch is a term for a female dog, I'm not sure how commonly it's used nowadays though.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:28 PM
3

On the topic about domestic violence I would mention this compilation of studies which contains a summaries of over 1700 peer reviewed studies on domestic violence. It is the most comprehensive collection of studies done to date. And that shows that men and women are victims at roughly the same rate. Just a link would suffice i think though. I take that as undeniable proof that men are victims of DV just as much as women, yet there are virtually no shelters or even hint of a way to get help for …
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:25 PM
1

TL;DR: Most of those accusations are completely wrong and outlandish, the only fair point was that women are rarely (if ever) forced to participate in war, and that men actually are responsible for many of the things you see around you (not just the bad ones), but that says nothing of any one individual man or woman. In regards to the first picture I read the first line and thought well that is true to some extent. I suppose they meant that they have never been forced to "fight and die for their…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:11 PM
1

WTF? why is this dubbed in French?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 07:22 PM
6

See, the misogyny has penetrated our society so far that even those who supposedly work to promote the safety of women use it inherently. The patriarchy is so powerful and widespread that it has even penetrated feminism itself thus doing the ultimate horror and raping feminism. Patriarchy is automatically assaulting feminism because for a woman to fight it they must acknowledge it to be true and that they are in fact weaker. By denying patriarchy I also deny that women are essentially weaker in …
/r/MensRights18/05/14 07:14 PM
9

The big guns in feminism today that are often quoted on here to prove that there is misandry in the powerful main branches of feminism they were active during the 90's and probably before then too. You just didn't hear about it as much because media wasn't as easily accessible as it is today.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 07:03 PM
1

It's not wrong to view sex in that way when it is for you and involving you. The problem arises when you look at it like that universally. Sex is often portrayed as actor and acted upon, subject object, male female etc... The thing is that this is a really crass view of looking at it and will in the end lead to such conclusions like "all sex is men raping women", please not that this is the logical end point to such a view. The view that universally a guy is the "giving" or "acting" part in sex …
/r/MensRights18/05/14 09:47 AM
1

As a swede, there was a big media outrage after this documentary. After this was done I haven't really heard anything about any of these organizations at all. I think that is the scary part though, as the "feminist initiative" party is growing in Sweden I'm not convinced that they will not join up with these organizations later. However there are voices that slowly call out the bullshit within feminism and things like this. I think that there is a slow but very steady progression of rationality …
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:35 AM
3

This is such a general question that it can't be answered at all actually, and there is a big problem in people claiming to have the answer. I'm early on in this thread but the answers I see here are hopeful to me. Why can't it be answered? First you have to define discrimination, what is discrimination, then you have to prove it, and you have to prove it extensively on several levels of society. There are so many differences and nuances even to discrimination that I could make an assumption tha…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:14 PM
5

This is what you get for broadening the definition of rape. In the beginning it was a horrible horrible thing like the back alley or dark park attack at knife or gunpoint by a group of men or something along those lines. It involved excessive force and body damage which is why it could be easily tested for and proved. What we have now is a broader definition for the same title of crime. We hear rape and still instinctual most of us think violent crime or something akin to the back alley thing. W…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:06 AM
2

When you get a baby through a sperm bank the donors are not supposed to pay child support right? Since her lawyer said that she wouldn't demand any financial support from him is shouldn't be too hard to put this in some sort of document legally signing away his parental rights as well as his parental responsibilities. What make this case interesting is that these are actually embryos (or pre embryos) they are "life" and the anti abortion crowd would consider it murder to deny any of these embryo…
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:48 AM
8

The "nerd" girl wore heavy makeup was not overweight had well kept but poorly styled hair and wore her skirt a bit high. The "nerd" guy was obese, had bad skin (red areas) can't say much about the hair, and decent clothing. The biggest difference was that with contact lenses (or just another pair of glasses, or not if you like) and a different hairstyle the girl would be attractive whilst the guy would need much more to be considered attractive. The other two were pretty silly either way. The fi…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:19 PM
1

Ah, I never bothered to think much about the whole brigading thing and what it really meant since it's nothing I'm really into doing. I guess you are right though. Yeah, I feel bad enough reading the things I find here (and in that thread) to not have to go and look for things to get depressed about. The world is full of shit, and I know that it's full of great and awesome things too, but sadly you don't get to see them as much.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:59 PM
1

I actively stay away from that kind of subreddit unless I have someone vouch for it. So I wouldn't have come across that thread unless I saw this post, and if I followed the link and participated wouldn't that be brigading? I would probably just be frustrated and downvoted and banned for trying to post my side. That sub really has no reason for being a default if they are so tired of men chiming in with their perspectives. It's obviously a female oriented sub which is fully okay to be, but if th…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:48 PM
3

Fuck, I want to participate in that discussion so bad, but rules are rules so I'll post my arguments here instead. The point isn't that 'all men aren't like that' - believe me, we know that. Just once it would be nice if we could have a discussion about women's experiences without someone feeling the need to reassure us that not all of the group we're talking about are assholes. Well that's the point isn't it, men commit a lot of crimes so it's easy to say that men are the problem right? That is…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:14 PM
2

First of all not having children when you are not only not financially stable but actually have some real financial issues already is a rational and reasonable thing to do. For that reason I find the decision to be somewhat reasonable. Now if that were all it was to the case that would be just peachy, but it isn't, regulating reproduction is one hell of a slippery slope and one should tread really carefully when there. I don't agree with the courts having the power to control the reproductive ri…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:46 PM
15

FWIW, as this example illustrates, "creep" literally has no meaning, women just say it in response to whatever they don't like. This is how most insults work actually which is why putting weight on the actual word is not really productive. Someone is angry and want to say something to hurt the other person, creep is used to berate men who are undesirable (women too but not nearly as much) and using this in an accusatory tone will convey that message and hopefully hurt the person. It's the same w…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:34 PM
2

MRA's are for men's rights, for advocating when they are infringed upon and for promoting the implementation of those rights that don't yet exist. MRA's mostly support equality though, but that is different from having equality as the real goal and focus. As I see it equality is a secondary goal for the MRM. Feminism has a goal statement of equality for women (paraphrased of course) not the advocacy of womens rights and when they are infringed upon, (though that is certainly done to some extent …
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:12 PM
4

How so? If the MRM is about equality for men does that imply women are already equal? This is where it becomes a little bit semantic. The MRM supports equality for all (well most of the MRM does at least, I don't think it's required) but what it works for is to illuminate and eradicate the problems faced by men. Feminism often claims to be the movement for equality for all, which doesn't jive with its teachings and statements. Much like what the comic said, if your passion is equality you are an…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 11:52 AM
9

She says her focus is on women, which should be totally fine. I see absolutely nothing wrong with that. I don't either except her reason for being feminist was because she was for equality. And then she says she's a feminist because she focuses on women. You can focus on the problems that women face and still be for equality, but one is feminism and the other is egalitarianism. Feminism is for the equality of women, which suggests that men are already equal, which is codswallop.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 11:04 AM
2

Yeah, it's a sick world we live in, in some ways. I'm hoping for at least one country to outlaw circumcision then maybe things might take off.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:03 AM
3

Yeah, there are so many religious traditions and orders from god that has been abandoned over the years. I don't think I'll ever see the reasoning behind why people would want to cut into the skin of their baby. That is what I resent about feminists not taking the issue of MGM to heart. If they did they would add weight to the already considered barbaric ritual of FGM. It would boil down to what it has always been, the right to bodily integrity for children. Whenever one tries to push the issue …
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:12 PM
1

Isn't sir what you respectfully call any man? Regardless of status? Unless you call them "Sir something or other" which should only be used if they have been officially awarded Knighthood. Professor is an earned title isn't it? There is some meaning to it right? Teachers should be called teachers if nothing else, if you are unsure of their rank it's just easier to call them ma'am. Sir / Ma'am Mr / Ms (or Mrs)
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:17 PM
7

Is there some credible educated estimation on the figures of prevalence of the different kinds of FGM? I have tried to find stuff about it but there is very little research done on the procedure to my knowledge. Also: Type one FGM would be like removing a male’s testes, type three is equivalent to removing both the testes and the penis. What the actual fuck? The testes are the testicles, which are the equivalent of the ovaries on a woman, none of which has anything to do with circumcision. Also …
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:06 PM
2

That's an interesting idea, if you could find the person who preformed the circumcision I suppose a good enough lawyer could be able to send the bill their way. Suddenly there is not so much money to be made there anymore.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:38 PM
23

Yeah, but the primary victim is not the one who is hurt the most, it's the one who is directly affected by harm. The father, the husband, and the son who dies or gets maimed in war is the primary victim. Their loved ones that are affected by that persons death is secondary victim. In war, every soldier is a primary victim, even if they don't receive physical damage no one leaves a war unscathed. The innocent civilians who loose their homes, lives and bear witness to the destruction of war are al…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:55 AM
1

And yet the mere concept of reverse-isms is inherently flawed. You don't need to know anything about the history of the issues to understand that. I understand how it can seem like that to someone though, but a teacher should know better.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 03:50 PM
1

It's the patriarchy all over again really, and nowadays it's basically built on a logical fallacy. 100 years ago it was built on a misunderstanding of how our society has evolved and severe lack of knowledge in people. Today patriarchy theory is often used as a proof to it's own existence. Take your example for instance, the fact that more people in political power are men is considered a proof of patriarchy, but only if you already go by the guidelines of patriarchy theory. The only thing that …
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:35 AM
9

If the correct answer isn't "C" then that's a problem, otherwise "A" is just as ridiculous an option as any of the others.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:14 AM
2

wow... so much hate in one person.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:42 AM
1

It may all be semantics but since the dictionary specifies that feminism is "equality for women" or "equal rights for women", at least it used to but the definition keeps getting re written. The thing is that the definition is an oxymoron. Standing up for womens rights and trying to solve womens issues is one thing but proclaiming equality for one single group suggests that other groups already have equality and that is by definition impossible. The advocacy for equal rights for all people is ca…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:29 AM
5

What you just described are all legitimate mens issues and thus all of them have a place here. Since I'm not a part of any of those groups I can't really speak for them, but I can speak to a person with those issues and I will try to give as much helping input as I can. This is men's rights, that means all mens rights, not straight white cis mens rights although their rights are still just as important too.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:10 AM
0

Being fat and pale was once attractive because it showed status. It showed that you were well off because you could eat and you didn't have to work the fields and get a tan. It was then pushed further and further along that line to the point where people used umbrellas when they went out on a sunny day. Not to cover their eyes but to cover their skin from the sun. Nowadays people are way more varied in their preferences and reasons for those preferences and a more interesting study would be on w…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:43 AM
4

Here's the thing, I am fully for people being allowed to wear what they want, to an extent of course. But I'm also for peoples freedom to think what they want about a person like that. If I saw a man wearing a dress I would find it funny looking and a little strange, because it is strange. It is highly unusual and different so it will of course invoke reaction. Most workplaces does have a certain dress code, there is even talk around here about policies regarding visual tattoos. And in many prof…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:17 AM
2

This seems to be feminism in a nutshell though. But I agree with you fully, it's amazing, scary, and quite sad actually.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:27 PM
1

It may well be a rallying call for some men, but the way things are in society right now and the social narrative I don't think it can gain much sympathy just yet. As with anything regarding abortion it's filled with a lot of emotions and it touches the philosophical at times. It does address a natural unfairness in regards to reproductive rights but going in to those waters even without the concept of financial abortion is anything but smooth sailing. As I have said before I find that the idea …
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:25 PM
2

well, you see, apparently male victims of violence don't count because it's also mostly men who commit them thus for some reason they negate each other. This does seem to be the thinking, at least from what I have seen when looking around on these issues. Men face the majority of scrutiny and hardships in this world, we face the majority of violence and yet are constantly told to "man up". No one has any problems with the masculine ideals of sacrificing yourself for others, the glass cellar, or …
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:55 PM
1

If the MRM wants to gain any real traction I would advise against bringing up the issue of financial abortion. I think a greater thing to start with would be the custody laws and laws regarding child support and alimony. Find some stories, show some cases of men working their asses off to pay alimony and child support. How they are considered far above the poverty line yet can barely afford to live. I am in theory for financial abortion, but in order to be able to have a decent debate and conver…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:36 PM
2

You may use it to your hearts content my friend.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:10 PM
3

Somehow the "ends" always justify the means. Said every super-villain ever! I have always tried to push the notion that the means should justify the ends instead.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:51 AM
9

Bigotry is the state of mind of a bigot: someone who, as a result of their prejudices, treats or views other people with fear, distrust or hatred on the basis of a person's ethnicity, evaluative orientation, race, religion, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, socioeconomic status, or other characteristics. From wikipedia on bigotry, emphasis mine. Your teacher is a bigot, by several cases of the definition of the word. Judging people by their skin color and …
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:39 AM
2

I think you made a mistake somewhere. Should there be a link to a video or something?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:26 AM
1

Go to youtube and search for Jimmy carr but be warned that most of his jokes can be considered highly offensive, I find him hilarious but I have a morbid sense of humor. He mentioned something in one of his shows that I haven't found again so I'm paraphrasing here. "I hope you haven't learned anything here tonight, this is a comedy show and not a lecture. You can pretty much assume that everything I say on this stage is pure bullshit." This is something that more people should realize when it co…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:31 AM
0

Section 2(a): Freedom FROM religion Now this should be more present in every constitution out there.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:15 AM
2

...for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me. /Exodus 20:5 Now I'm not religious but I do believe that some biblical quotes can be used to show the utter lunacy in some peoples thinking. There is another quote that I think also suits this video. “Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be …
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:07 AM
17

wow, this reminds me of China where, at least several years ago, students had to have a mandatory year studying the teachings of Mao Zedong before advancing to higher education. This is as close to brainwashing as you can come, brainwashing of half the population. I mean don't people see the bullshit of such statements? Don't people see the world that that would create? I would also love to see some data on violence against men, since men are the ones who are at a greater risk and not women. As …
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:44 AM
2

I have a few issues with this story (other than it's blatant fabrication of course). Who wears their car keys visibly in a grocery line? What kind of woman gets close to crying from the hint that she's a bad driver because she's a woman? Sure she may have had the worst of worst days... but still. the whole line started clapping? what movie was this? what man goes around and says stuff like this? in a grocery line no less? The random army helicopter pilot that showed up was way to cool and conven…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:15 PM
7

Well not where I come from or in my circles at the time though I was only 9... It would be awesome to have a new song to bring the issue to light again though.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:06 PM
3

I just wanted to be Ryan gosling. Don't we all want that from time to time?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:03 PM
3

As a swede who never really liked Folkpartiet (peoples liberal party) this is forcing me to reevaluate some things before the upcoming vote. I can't believe that this hasn't gotten more news here in Sweden though... well actually I can but never mind. This is a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:00 PM
11

As a guy who went through an (emotionally and verbally) abusive relationship those lyrics are scary to read. Seriously, I would love for this song to get some more popularity to maybe spark some new life into the notion that men also suffer from IPV on similar levels as women.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:38 PM
56

I actually saw it as if he meant the "notion" of systemic patriarchy, but that may just be my own blue-eyed approach to the world. Whether you like it or not systemic patriarchy exists even if it's just a feverish concoction of fantasy. For a person that truly believes in this fantasy it's real. What I see being done in this comic is thoroughly debunking the notion of systemic patriarchy by using it as an example of it's own inherent bigotry and sexism. Again, I'm a naive motherfucker so I may j…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:31 PM
1

While the ensuing cirklejerk would probably reap me loads of karma I'm much too lazy for such a thing. I rarely start things, or finnish them, I just like to hop on the ride for a while and then get off it.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 05:18 PM
1

But now I want to... Such a statement is just too inviting. Oh well, some other time, perhaps.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 05:00 PM
1

I think it's hard to say specifically, the thing about a straw man is that they all are possible straw men. A group is composed out of so many people and so many different kinds of views that pretty much any argument about the group itself can be turned into arguing with a straw man, which is possibly why that statement is used so often. That being said, the only other argument I have heard for censorship is about "triggers" so I kind of think it's a fairly accurate description of mainstream fem…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 04:29 PM
2

(1) good people must actively oppose the hateful ideas of bad people. Good people "must" not do anything, and there is so much more nuance to what makes people good or bad. By making a statement as above you cannot be a good person unless you actively oppose every hateful idea of every bad person. This calls into question who makes the call of what is hateful ideas and what makes a person good or bad. What about hateful ideas of good people? What about good ideas of bad people? (2) failure to re…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 04:07 PM
5

Girls periods happen, and I don't see why there's anything wrong with that. Its a fairly big part of many women's lives. ... like conversations about basic concepts of female anatomy. I never understood this argument. Yes periods and cervical mucous is part of normal female physiology but so is sweat, poop, snot, phlegm, and pee. There is never an opinion on how the mentality towards those things need to change, and sure they are not specific to female physiology since they are just as common in…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 07:04 AM
1

As an amateur cook myself I can tell you that you can get away dirt cheap if you know how and what to shop and cook. I constantly surprise people with how much I pay for food each month and yet my fridge is always full. You got to look for ingredients that are in season and put some effort into selection.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:50 AM
9

First of all the studies themselves were flawed in methodology as there are plenty of other variables influenceing the risk etc. There is also the tidbit about the circumcised men receiving condoms and information about safer sex while the others recived nothing. However let's say that it does reduce the risk for the sake of argument. Since the methodology in the studies was flawed they have no real idea of why this is. One theory is that the keratinisation of the penis destroys the mucous membr…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:32 AM
3

Seems like this person should take their own advice in researching the movement. Though sadly I don't think it'll help. I don't see how someone who looks objectively on this place can't see why it exists and the good it does. The scary and difficult part for most people is to realize that there is something wrong with the narrative of the world. This is close to the conspiracy theory way of thinking and that's why it's scary. Thing is though that as long as you follow facts and try to be objecti…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:26 AM
2

I'm glad there are at least two groups dedicated to the act of sexual intercourse with a male. What else could "fuck men" mean? /s
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:15 AM
9

It's the fear of that that keeps the police so on edge about these situations and more likely to resort to violence. It's a negative spiral that getting out of control.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:42 AM
1

I know that it's for wooing women but I assume plenty of the methods can be used on men to. With varying amounts of tweaking.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:44 AM
1

I'm not well versed in the "PUA" lingo but wouldn't that be akin to "negging" or what it's called? An insult veiled as a compliment or whatnot.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:54 PM
6

You could tell him about all those Europeans/Canadians/Australians/Asians/etc who all have lost their dick to gangrene... oh wait that didn't happen. What he heard of was most likely paraphimosis, which is a little scary but also incredibly rare and easily treated with a lateral (I believe) incision. I won't deny that it may have happened, but I have never heard of a person loosing his dick over paraphimosis, a traumatic experience yes but ultimately they walked away with their penis still there…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:01 AM
4

Funny thing is that your comment is still there and the reply to it while far from optimal has a final conclusion that I wish feminism would make more often. Although just teaching and promoting the general idea of "don't have sex with/touch someone who doesn't want it/doesn't give consent" is probably a better approach than separating men v. women for this issue. See, that there is a good step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:49 AM
2

I have always been of the belief that when it comes to abortion there should be a 40/60 say in it between the man and the woman. Biologically it occurs in the womans body and so naturally the woman has the final say in the matter. It's not fair, but that's life and nature for you, not really much to do about it. That doesn't mean we can't recognize the pain of a father who lost his potential child/ren. If we remove the physical factor this would be the same feeling a woman might have if she had …
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:40 AM
1

I have felt "used" for sex at a few occasions, and while that was a sucky feeling, that is all it was. As soon as I noticed I ended things and didn't really look back more than one usually does on a mistake. It's in the worst case a betrayal of trust that just happens to involve sex.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:04 PM
3

How good of a contact do you have with Charlie? you write that you think of him as family but have you ever had some conversations just between the two of you? I ask because this can be crucial in how to tell him these news. If he has been together with this girl for over five years and she has lied all this time about not wanting children (my assumption) there is the possibility that he won't believe you. There is also the possibility that you will be branded the "liar" by her. Maybe this is ju…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:51 PM
2

This was relieving to read. I have to admit that I have had some fears as to what the future could be like akin to OP. Even though I know it's not rationally plausible. What bothers me is the mental shackles though. The hypocrisy that permeates feminism is spreading with it. I know far too many people who can see through the bullshit into reality to be seriously worried. But I also see so many people closing their eyes and never questioning the narrative. The domestic violence stats is a clear i…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 10:55 AM
1

If you have been the victim of a crime that is a matter for the police, not an educational institution. Their job comes after the person has been tried and found guilty. If the person is not found guilty the educational institution has no grounds for any kind of action in the matter. Innocent until proven guilty!
/r/MensRights01/05/14 08:12 PM
3

Whoa, whoa, whoa there horsey, have some oats and calm down for a while. I may not have been clear enough here but people put way to much weight on the feeling of shame. It's there to tell you that you did something wrong, and cutting of healthy tissue from a child is wrong, especially if it's a cultural thing. I can understand people who do it because it's a cultural thing and I can understand that they didn't know better, but that does not change nor excuse what they had done. I'm not saying t…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:58 PM
4

If you decide to have a knife taken to your child for any other reason than a medical emergency or last resort you should mod definitely be ashamed of yourself. If you had this done to you as a child there is no reason to be ashamed, really it was not your choice. Do we tell people to be ashamed because they are amputees? No, but we can still acknowledge that they are missing a part of their body.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:22 PM
3

If you're hanging around naked with your son enough for it to even be a topic of discussion, then a) you probably need to change some behaviors Nah, I was in the sauna plenty of times with my dad and several other men when I was younger and we went swimming, it was also one big shared collective changing room for all men. I noticed early on that there was a difference between an adult penis and a child's one. The biggest difference would be size and hair.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:00 PM
2

There's a completely different kind of sensation that you cannot perceive. This is what I meant when I said that there was a whole other dimension of pleasure. Perhaps I could have worded that differently.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:53 PM
3

I think I get your point now, thank you for the clarification and I do agree with you fully.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:46 PM
3

You said yourself that it was speculation and that you weren't sure. This whole issue is wrought with bias and misinformation and it's really both sad and scary to witness. Since I'm from a place where circumcision is hardly a question and something you don't hear about until you grow older the whole idea of cutting it, for any reason is outlandish and barbaric to me. I admit that I too am biased and maybe just a little bit too emotional about it at times but that is simply because I have only l…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:42 PM
9

Facts: The female external clitoris has around 8000 nerve endings, the male foreskin has about 20 000 nerve endings. A male circumcision removes more that twice the amount of nerve endings as a cliterectomy ie type II FGM.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:38 AM
11

As regards circumcision, I think that one of its objects is to limit sexual intercourse, and to weaken the organ of generation as far as possible, and thus cause man to be moderate. Some people believe that circumcision is to remove a defect in man’s formation; but every one can easily reply: How can products of nature be deficient so as to require external completion, especially as the use of the fore-skin to that organ is evident. This commandment has not been enjoined as a complement to a def…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:28 AM
13

As i've said before, if the issue is with genital mutilation or bodily autonomy or unnecessary forced surgery or outdated cultural practices, then it's totally not gendered... The thing here is that this issue is clearly gendered in the most obvious and provable sense there is, the legal sense. It is illegal to so much as touch the female genitals with a sharp or pointy object if not accutely medically necessary, yet it's perfectly legal to cut off a large portion of a males genitals. I may have…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:09 AM
7

I will humor you and tell you why you were downvoted. Firstly what you wrote before your edit brought nothing to the discussion other than calling intact penises more ugly. It's your personal preference to think so but it insulting and not really brining anything to the discussion at all. Secondly the entire tone of your comment together with the subject matter at hand and lack of clarification will lead many to infer that the core of your post is "I'm happy that I'm circumcised therefore there …
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:04 AM
2

If you assign yourself a label (let's take a random example and say feminist here) you choose to place this on yourself along with all that comes with that label. If you choose to call yourself a feminist it is your job to criticize what others to wrong with that label. You have to acknowledge all the bad things that is done in your name as well as all the good things. It is your responsibility to distance yourself from the parts that you don't agree with if you don't want others to think that y…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:27 AM
2

True! IMO the definition is a rather spot on description of our society as it is though. Since sexism against men is often said to not exist and when the word sexism is used (at least in mainstream media) is is most often used to describe sexism against women. That being said there is no real reason to have such a statement at all in a dictionary. Sexism is prejudice and discrimination in regards to gender or sex, regardless of what sex that is.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:17 AM
6

I don't deny that there might be some truth to the fact that there is a reduction in transmission rates of some stds and HIV. The fact that the circumcised penis undergoes keratinization and that the mucous membranes dry out and becomes tough skin would account for that. Since most STD's and HIV are transferred via bodily fluids sensitive mucous membranes are more likely to absorb said diseases. This has to be acknowledged however, this is not a good argument for a surgical procedure. It should …
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:11 AM
2

While /u/aPseudonymPho provided an excellent description of the pure dynamics involved and might actually have a better stand point in explaining since he is getting close to know both sides. I thought I would share a little of the actual sensations. I only recently learned about the nerves and fine touch receptors in the foreskin and with that decided to actually examine what happened and where exactly things felt good during masturbation. Since masturbation with a foreskin often involves movin…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:36 PM
3

But what's it like to not use lube? Is it like moving your hand across the skin of your arm or something? I guess what I'm asking is, is it "sticky" or "dry and smooth"? I wonder since what I call dry, as an intact man, is still "sticky" like the inside of your lips if you let them dry. And such a surface is not ideal to "rub".
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:24 PM
0

Is this for real? Wtf? I don't know what laws you have over there but where I live it's always the drivers fault legally when in an accident with a bike. Did she not have headlights? Why was she speeding when there was low visibility? And why for the love of God is she suing those who she killed and hospitalized?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:43 AM
1

My point was to explain the nature of specific roles and that all of them are gradually dissipating. I don't think men "ought" to have any enforced role other than "father", and that is only if they choose to be one. The assumed role of a man is something different for each person since the assumption is based on that person's experiences.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:19 AM
5

It would be awesome if this could be an international day where we acknowledge and pay homage to those that give their lives so that ours can be better.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:36 PM
2

Roles are interesting since it's rarely mentioned if this is about assumed roles, general roles, supposed roles, or even enforced roles or to which extent these roles are practiced. In the olden days when we lived in caves we had the hunter and gatherer society, right there by natural selection the men were the hunters and the women were the gatherers. Hunter is high risk high reward and gatherer is low risk low reward. Up until now society in general has mostly had this at it's core, and it has…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 04:34 PM
8

There was an issue with this in Sweden recently. Male bus drivers had to wear long pants and long sleeves even during summer. Women could wear short skirts and t-shirts. The men were not allowed to wear shorts so they all collectively wore skirts too. This caused some major hullabaloo and I don't recall how it all ended.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 10:55 AM
0

And yet we do have obligatory shared custody of children in the events of a divorce, no alimony and a reasonable figure when it comes to child support. Yes feminism still has it's claws hooked into mainstream politics and you can't argue against the negative sides of immigration etc. without being branded a nazi. Still, Sweden is a decent country, we are far from perfect but we do get by rather well. A lot of things mentioned here are sensationalist pieces with no real grip of reality. They are …
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:43 AM
2

You need to look at the video again, from beginning to finish. Everybody is after this guy, he's punched and pulled and shoved and god knows what by a number of people. This is basically a brawl and from what I can see all of the active participants are male (yes it matters). This guy is fighting for his life and all of a sudden someone punches him right in the face. Have you ever been punched in the face? it fucking hurts even if it's a weak person who does it. In a brawl, if you are punched yo…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:23 PM
9

...societal gender norms as the point here is that there is a difference between doing the things you're biologically good at and being told you're less of a person for doing things that the opposite gender is "supposed" to be good at- wearing dresses/trousers, female breadwinners/SAH male parents, etc. This is my trouble with the whole concept of social norms, to me a norm is a generalization of what most people belonging to a specific group do. The more people talk about the evil of norms I fe…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:50 PM
107

Oh my, apparently all that survival training and enduring the harshest of environments can't stop a television show from ruffling their feathers. I mean seriously, these women can probably brave more tough nature than I can imagine without complaining and one lousy show comes on and all that strength is nowhere to be seen? I'm disappointed, really. "it was absurd to think that women weren’t as capable as men when it came to survival skills." “It’s fantastical and ridiculous. Women are every bit …
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:40 PM
3

What is she even trying to say with this piece? what does the spermjacking have to do with anything? Interesting video about that BTW. She's going to argue against promiscuity, what the hell does that even mean? Don't cheat on your partner? Which she apparently equates with some sort of sexual liberation, or maybe she's calling out the bullshit of the second wave that did this and are now old and alone. In the end this felt like some sort of whining piece about a troubled woman who can't be both…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:57 PM
1

Ha! this was excellent. I mean I knew there was some sort of point coming but this was really well played.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:23 PM
8

It's funny how they mention that Sweden was so great at being equal in education when we were several points below the average in the study. Meaning the education is equal but poor.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:49 PM
1

Well the core concept is true. The mod's have the power and there is really nothing to do about it unless you want to create another system altogether. We all have a right to voice our opinions but we also have a right not to listen. It's not a right to be heard. Banning people for dissenting opinions is not conductive to a productive discussion though. I don't really see the issue here, there is no democracy on the Internet, I thought people knew this already. You have the right to voice your o…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 10:58 AM
7

This isn't about ability to consent or not, it's about law. I assume for the sake of argument that the age of consent is 18 where this took place. She is 29 years old and should have full knowledge of the law which clearly states that you can not have a sexual relationship with someone under the legal age of consent without breaking the law and committing statutory rape. Was there really no one else she could have sex with? Had she no toys or eligible 18 year olds lining up? Since she was also h…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:29 AM
2

Thank you for eloquently framing my exact thoughts on the matter.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:07 AM
1

Well that's not really what I heard, especially from the quote in the title. Of course you need to control for environmental differences otherwise you can't be sure that what you are looking at is actual genetic differences. That doesn't mean you can't start examining genetic differences right now. My reasoning behind this is that before you go calling racism you also have to control for other variables. Yes there is a clear underrepresentation of black people in higher education and science (I …
/r/MensRights19/04/14 07:21 AM
4

I find this interesting given the whole "male power fantasy" lingo that is still sprouted over men's objectification. Also I keep getting annoyed at people equating "standards" with "ideal" and "perfect". Too often have I heard people say that womens "standard" of beauty is set to high, while what is actually set really high is the "ideal" and not even that actually since models and movie stars are basically manufactured and pretty much everyone knows this already. Funny though how men's ideal b…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 09:30 PM
3

I hate to break it to dr. (I assume) Tyson but there will never be that kind of equal opportunity because there is no real way of measuring it and it has way more to do with other factors than race or gender. I'm not sure if he has kids but I bet he'd be all kinds of supportive if one of his kids wanted to be a physicist. I wanted to be one too, and I too faced a whole lot of "fences" and "hills" and whatnot. Still I had an educated mother who was on my side so there's that. What if there is a b…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 09:01 PM
1

Will there be signs? I would show up with something that shows battered husbands, murdered men, injured soldiers, suicide victims, and all that jazz. I wouldn't really though, to be honest, unless I found some way to just discreetly make people see the point.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 04:44 PM
3

The problem arises in that a big part of what we do is calling out discrimination, and increasing taxes for one specific group is discrimination. It will affect people simply for belonging to a specific group and no other reason. Just to use your own example. I don't believe in the equal worth of all people, I believe that we value each other on a complex system but that we do have an equal basic value though. The average of a group does nothing to affect an individual in said group though. Mean…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 10:31 AM
11

Imagine if your Accountant asked you if you really wanted to buy all that stock in MegaCorp, cause they haven't had the best luck with price-stability, and your first reaction was personal insult and rage. Come on Megacorp cares about it's investors.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 09:49 AM
3

Have you been there? The place has existed for 4 years, has ~60 subscribers and a total of ~10 posts. It's pretty much what you'd call dead and insignificant. Why should the sub be on the sidebar in the first place? Because of it's name?
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:05 AM
10

Now I don't think that the MRM has an ideology or an agenda, just a bunch of people with sometimes differing views what important men's issues are. And I think we should keep this stance actually. Feminism wasn't late to adopt an ideology and an agenda, both based in the much simplified statement "women are oppressed by men". This has been the core of all feminist theory to date. If a woman is in a bad situation you can bet your ass it was men's fault one way or the other. Now sure a lot of men'…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:16 AM
3

Wow... the comment section on that page. I wonder what all the deleted posts said. Aside from that the article had nothing of any sort of value, it was not really well written, it was way to short, it had gross mistakes in facts and just not worth the five minutes I gave it and it's comments.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 07:40 PM
1

Opting out of fatherhood (as I have seen it here) is only supposed to be open in the same time-frame that a woman can have an abortion. I'm still a bit torn on the method of execution and the details surrounding when it comes to "male abortion" though. I find the idea has merits but there are some wrinkles to iron out first. However, after this time has passed both parents should be legally obligated to share custody of the child 50/50 (with a flex window in there for good measure). This is basi…
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:53 PM
1

Just out of curiosity, where do you live? The sight sounds quite amusing to me (assuming of course that this is consensual) and quite a novel sight... for me at least.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:40 PM
2

Wouldn't it be incredibly easy (a monumental but simple task) to gather information about position, credentials, hours worked, etc... and also gender (throw in sexual orientation there where possible too) and get the respective pay that each of these people receive. Then just review the data available. You could see how much pay might differ between different companies in similar fields, how position and seniority figure in what is payed. You could also examine what I have been curious about sin…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 09:34 PM
3

Thanks, I'll read it and get back to you.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 10:58 AM
3

Res tells me I have been giving you a lot of upvotes so apparently I like what you say and how you reason. <So I decided to fill in the gap and construct a systemic understanding/blueprint of our society's gender norms and a speculative explanation as to their origins. Would you mind sharing what you have found? I'm quite curious about other people's understanding of these things.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 10:42 AM
0

To be technical you did judge it to be typographical outrage, and I have to say I do agree with you on that though.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:47 PM
7

I think there should always be anonymity of the accused until the person is convicted, if the person in found not guilty anonymity should remain. Being accused of something should not be a crime and should not be a punishment. This is especially true of emotional cases like rape and statutory rape and pretty much any case of violence towards children. People don't want justice, they want someone, anyone, to burn.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:41 PM
27

Is this what they call irony? Or was it double standards?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 02:59 PM
5

The procedure, yes, mine took half an hour from the moment I stepped in to the operating room until I walked out of the hospital. To be fair I waited a while for some papers afterwards too so it would have probably been like 20-25 minutes. To actually get a doctor to do it is apparently a whole other story, at least in the states. It depends of where you live and what doctor you meet, both at the consultation and at the moment of the procedure. I have heard stories of people who have been booked…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:49 PM
8

Again I recommend at least checking out /r/childfree a little bit. It's got a pretty bad rep around reddit but so does this place, and neither is really deserved IMO. You'll find similar situations. Usually vasectomy will be recommended because it's a simpler procedure than essure (even though it's pretty simple too) and also because you'll have to pay for it yourself, reducing likelihood of you getting one and increasing the chances of an "oops baby" and thus revenue for the state. As someone e…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:41 PM
12

“To prevent Norwegian male children’s exposure to health hazards it is necessary to introduce statutory regulation in this field,” he is quoted as telling NTB. “Now we ensure that the procedure is performed in a proper manner by competent personnel.” Yeah, to prevent children from getting hurt we will now hurt them in sterilized conditions instead. It's not mutilation if it's done by a medical professional... Fuck you! Yeah, if people believe very strongly that tattooing your children is correct…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:36 PM
5

All kinds of vasectomies are reversible, it's expensive and I think about 50-70% success rate though. I keep rooting for Vasalgel though, it's the fucking messiah of male BC.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:28 PM
40

I suggest you take this to /r/childfree , there are a lot of people over there who have been in similar situations and know much more about the procedures from experience and research. They also have lists of doctors who have little to no problem sterilizing people before 30. Since I'm a man and got a vasectomy myself I'm not all that well versed about essure, I have heard both good and bad things about it. The weird statement aside, if you are really sure about not having kids a vasectomy is so…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:25 PM
1

Wow... that was quite powerful. And really scary. Thank you.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:59 AM
0

can you put a dog in a room with 30 other dogs and expect that dog to become well adjusted? no of course not, you will end up with a very bad dog. you teach the dog yourself. This illustrates perfectly why schools are needed and why early daycare is so good, and why there should be more personnel in all these professions. It also illustrates your complete ignorance about how dogs function. I have been present and helped with raising several litters of puppies and also seen the interactions betwe…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:43 AM
3

Shoving this shit back in a gender neutral way: Should a person feel responsible for the actions and opinions of people who share the gender they subscribe to, the race they belong to and the sexual orientation they have? And in a not so neutral way: Should Obama be ashamed to be black simply because [insert some statistics of a bad thing happening for which black people are a majority of the perpetrators, you can even limit it to a geographical area.] ?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:19 AM
1

The sad part about this is not that she's a woman it's that she's a teacher and has a massive influence over people. I agree that OP should not try to take it personal and too serious, but from another perspective the situation itself has the potential to be quite serious. She obviously has some issues but if she can't be at least a little objective about what she teaches she should not be doing it.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:07 AM
3

cough cough prostate cancer cough cough It's only the most common form of cancer regardless of gender race or whatever.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 08:03 AM
4

aggressively dislikes me being a feminist who's trying to talk about men's issues, so I never engage here. :/ Well the thing you have to understand is that a large faction (some say it's entirety but that's up for interpretation) of feminism (the movement and political ideology and philosophy combined) is outright ignoring and perpetuating the issues that men face. The very idea of patriarchy theory is a big fuck you to men everywhere, and naturally that raises strong emotions. If you call yours…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:34 AM
3

I need to get myself a copy of and read/listen to that book. I have heard so much shit about it and him from the "feminist camp" and so much good about it and him from here. I have watched a few of his videos and he does appear to be a decent chap.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:23 AM
6

I once saw a dude in business attire jump away from me while walking around on a high-traffic sidewalk at night, when I stuck my hand into my pocket (I actually hadn't noticed him). He said something like, "Don't pepper spray me, I'm just walking!" He crossed the street and we walked in the same direction in an uncomfortable silence. I felt really bad for causing him anxiety. ... wow , I have never actually heard of that situation happen before, I have lived the opposite one though, a little bit…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:51 AM
1

but perhaps that is an unrealistic ideal, as frankly i think males and females generally are different The problem comes when people fail to realize this. The search of equality is oftentimes mislead onto a path towards, well equality but in the sense that we are all the same. We are not equal, we will never be equal, it's a fact of life, it's survival of the fittest and it will always be so. Instead of working against this and trying to make all people the same why not celebrate our differences…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:05 PM
8

Can you give me some examples of how female allies can help prevent male discrimination? What do you mean by a female ally? You can talk about it, you can bring it up, if you have been hanging around here you are sure to be aware of quite a few things that are discriminating towards men. Now I don't mean to be a walking billboard, people hate that kind of person, well, most people. I mean to casually bring up some interesting subjects when appropriate in discussion or everyday conversation. Just…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:45 PM
3

... wow! That just makes the whole situation more... ironic?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:27 AM
2

That's what I took from the song as well... you know when I found the text online because I can't hear what they are saying most of the time. Pussy Cartel Heh... hehehe...
/r/MensRights12/04/14 05:59 AM
9

What is peoples problems with that song? The only part that's even remotely close to even indicate some smudge of being "rapey" is the title. And that's stretching things. Wouldn't the song "drunken love" be even more "rapey"?
/r/MensRights11/04/14 09:29 PM
4

Well you know, different strokes for different folks.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 03:38 PM
2

But I've never seen it as a violation of my rights, or as a bad choice on my parents' part. Well it's not about you then, it's about those who see it as such, it's about those that do see it as a violation. There are men who suffer from this for their entire lives, there are boys who die from the procedure. The right answer is to not preform unnecessary amputations on a child who literally can't consent. There are four different scenarios that can happen depending on the choice. If you decide to…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:26 PM
10

Because a big part of the world don't circumcise their boys and they have no health defects because of it. Parent's are not explained the negative sides and that all the possible "benefits" can be achieved with common sense and condoms and in those cases the degree of efficiency goes up a hundred fold if not more.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:08 PM
6

I don't really agree that we shame those that are circumcised at least not intentionally. We actively proclaim the negatives of circumcision because they are real and people don't know about them. Would you say those that proclaim the horrors of FGM are shaming the victims of FGM by doing so? To one day see the end of this procedure this is something that needs to be done. How can we talk about the negative sides of MGM if we can't mention the negative impact it has? We are the child pointing ou…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:04 PM
2

The last difference is age. MGM is usually done to neonates, and FGM is done to older children. In this respect, people often argue that MGM is "better" because the victim doesn't remember the trauma. I usually think of it that yes, it is worse for those girls because of the difference in age and performance of the procedure. That doesn't make it better for boys though. It's a little bit of cognitive dissonance but I think it kind of makes sense. To take your example for example, one is worse th…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:49 PM
3

You should tell him that since he is not the one going under the knife he has no say in it either. Leave the decision to the one that is getting cut, the baby/ies. Let them deal with that when they become 18 and can do whatever they want with their bodies. I find the whole circ debate both hilarious and utterly frightening since I come from a place where the procedure is incredibly rare. We have never had an HIV/aids epidemic, phimosis is pretty much unheard of (it does happen but it's extremely…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:42 PM
5

No, it's not like they did that, I mean a vasectomy is actually reversible. They just decided to not care about what the child might think in the future and just chop off the most sensitive part of his penis. Let me tell you as a man born in a culture where circumcision is basically unheard of, that it's not really something you ever even consider. The point of it all is that if the child gets to stay intact he can actually make an informed decision. If he's circumcised he has no way of ever mak…
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:01 AM
6

And more power to you for it. I have a bum knee (not exactly comparable but still) I can still walk and run but not for extended periods. I'm happy with my leg for all the good it does but that doesn't mean I don't wish it was better. Your penis is still a penis, it works and I assume touching it feels good. It's also the only one you've got, so why not be happy about it. This doesn't mean that you can't acknowledge that it's a horrible thing to do.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:28 AM
14

Well obviously the core concept. You are welcome to have a look around.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 07:21 AM
2

I feel like if you can't make a point without offending a group of people than maybe it's not a point worth making. I respectfully disagree, in part, because that's the kind of thinking that IMO will hold potentially inspired thoughts back or even shut them down completely. If we can't examine topics that easily offend people and that carry a lot of weight we will never really get a clear picture of them. This doesn't mean that you should intentionally try to offend people. It's not always clear…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:22 PM
1

Your second point I'll take to mind, Just out of curiosity, which one was that, I kinda drowned in my own words when trying to find it. But I must ask, what do you consider PC language? What do you mean by that? When I say PC language I mean that the priority lies in walking on eggshells so as to not offend anyone. The focus ends up more on being politically correct than actually stating a thought or idea. Keeping a generally politically correct tone is important in official statements and the l…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:52 PM
1

That sounds regressive and ignorant. PC shouldn't be a bad thing. I hope you don't accept people who use homophobic slurs. I accept all people and I respect their freedom to think what they want of me or anyone else. That doesn't mean I like it or them though but it's a consequence of freedom that they be allowed and not thought of as less human because of it. When it comes to slurs they are mostly being called out on but here we try to look at the idea behind the actual words. I have many frien…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:23 PM
1

I think the analogy what a little funny but might be easy to miss and a little loaded. Think of it as an "in-joke". The klan, as in KKK would be feminism (funny given the reputation much of feminism has here), they dress up in white sheets looking like ghosts, that would be that they support LGBTIQ issues (when it suits them). Then we have you, who's main point is LGBTIQ issues (dressing as a ghost), hungerwolf is asking why you'd join feminism when there are specific groups out there advocating…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 10:01 PM
1

To be honest I'm not overly sure this it the place for LGBTIQ activism (emphasis on activism), there is nothing stopping you of course I just haven't seen much in that direction in my time here. Now don't get me wrong, I don't consider the MRM as something "exclusive", meaning that you can't be active in something else at the same time. From what I see there is very little actual "activism" in this movement and more focus on finding, sharing, and advocating for the plight that men face regardles…
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:36 PM
1

I see, I have never really delved into such things so what do I know.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 08:47 PM
2

Sorry, I was thinking income, I mean he has to have an influx of money from somewhere right?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 08:14 PM
2

Well I'm not to fond of the military at all although I realize it's need in todays world. It's the institution itself that I don't like not necessarily specific individuals though, and of course this is all my personal opinion. It's not bashing the military per se, it's bashing the mandatory part, the implications behind being forced to sign up for selective service. Or it's counterparts in other countries. I'm well aware that the military does more than just fighting in wars and all that jazz, …
/r/MensRights08/04/14 08:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter