TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Blindocide Archive

View 6 posts and 506 comments by Blindocide on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

oh you disagreed with me? that's exactly what I would expect to happen! you only strengthened my position! seriously, look up the trilemma. also look up "gettier problems" and realize we have no consistent philosophical definition for "knowledge". now, those isn't to say I don't agree with you. I love science and see it as a way forward for our species. we simply don't have a way to show that this is how it actually is. no argument can show it as such. also "What The Tortoise Said To Achilles" t…
/r/PussyPass06/06/15 02:25 AM
0

I'm gonna read this later but thank you for your reasoned response. at a wedding, gotta act nice
/r/PussyPass05/06/15 10:49 PM
0

I think it actually makes perfect sense that she screened what she said and didn't say through a filter, called a lawyer or an editor, and it seems logical that her editor/lawyer would advise against telling the public about things which would make the public angry with her. now this only carries weight if she actually did things she doesn't want to mention, but seeing as she's a human being I can almost guarantee you there are things she didn't mention. and you should read about Münchhausen's T…
/r/PussyPass05/06/15 07:13 PM
0

or you could answer his relatively benign question
/r/PussyPass05/06/15 07:02 PM
1

got a citation for this outrageous generalization?
/r/PussyPass05/06/15 02:53 AM
1

how constructive and purposeful.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:35 PM
1

yeah that guy. man I could have finished this up a bit sooner. turns out the definition for an argument is: a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong. according to google, at least. so the whole point of an argument is to persuade, but no argument is actually persuasive. they fundamentally do not do what they set out to do. that's what I meant by "pointless". there may be a better term for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:34 PM
1

the dichotomy was wrong because I put words in his mouth. sorry if you're upset that I failed and therefore you don't "win" or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:30 PM
1

all modus ponens deductions are equally worthless, as well as unsatisfying. unless you can solve Carroll's dilemma, which even Bernard Russell couldn't do. and that guy was sharp.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:19 PM
1

thanks babe.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:18 PM
1

I may have been wrong when I said that originally. I shouldn't have spoken in his stead because a couple comments ago I realized I was wrong. I also probably should have told you that a couple of comments ago. my bad. EDIT: this is why I said we basically just agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:09 PM
1

no, you're wrong. this is certainly going places, right? almost like it affirms what I'm saying in that other pointless argument we're having.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:03 PM
1

but it actually does. because personal satisfaction is the only criteria by which we choose any positions in the first place. since all arguments are equally unsatisfying, it isn't the argument that is convincing anybody. if arguments don't change people's minds it seems like its pointless to make them, no? this would be a good time to mention the short essay "What the Tortoise Said To Achilles", a dilemma proposed by Lewis Carroll in 1895 that problematises the validity of modus ponens deductio…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:02 PM
1

I think you're presenting a false dichotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:34 PM
1

no but seriously I'm right, and I'd love for you to try and argue that I'm wrong. but the thing about your argument is I can say something like "well that simply isn't personally satisfying to me" and there's no real way you can make it so that it is. so for you to try and argue that arguing is not pointless, would be pointless. because either I basically already agree with you or I never will. would you like me to continue or will you continue to not agree, only furthering my position? EDIT: th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:31 PM
1

oh no this conversation is over and done with. we basically reached the point where we agree so there's nothing left to be said. if you can't see how it relates then you're being purposefully thick.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:26 PM
1

thank you for confirming my suspicions. it is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:25 PM
1

indeed. so just don't point back to Sulkowicz as evidence for this claim and we're fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:17 PM
1

there's so many reasons why making arguments is pointless but I won't blame you for not knowing any of that because very few people do. i could elaborate, and give you a really long explanation with numerous wikipedia entries about fundamentally insurmountable philosophical dilemma that cements us in this position of futility. but I doubt you'd agree with me. which is actually more evidence that making an argument is pointless. so no matter what you do with this information it only makes my posi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:12 PM
1

because he's attacking the process by which you formed those opinions. he even agrees that people who experience trauma act weirdly so obviously he won't argue against it. he said that himself. but it's the fact that you call Sulkowicz a victim of trauma implicitly means you think that she experienced trauma, a.k.a. rape, and that's exactly what is the problem. we do not know if she was raped, so justifying her actions as those of a rape victim is faulty logic. we do not know if she is a victim.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:04 PM
1

he is literally trying to help you avoid stepping on the rake and smacking yourself in the face with it and you go off and do it anyway. it is undeniable that you stepped on the rake and smacked yourself in the face. this dude even called it out before you did it. so, are you going to continue hitting yourself in the face with the rake or are you going to stop doing that? because it's embarrassing the rest of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 08:53 PM
1

what's hilarious about this is that you think your interaction between you and that dude ends up being a difference of opinion. i call it hilarious because if I didn't laugh I'd have to kill myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 08:47 PM
1

sure thing. maybe you'll grow up in the intervening time and learn a little bit about the real world. that's the actual mechanism that would occur, instead of this "magic" you allude to. you probably shouldn't respond to this because there simply isn't a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 08:10 PM
1

I was arguing with this guy who claimed the A key no longer existed as the A key when you rotated the keyboard 180 degrees. he was like 35.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 08:05 PM
1

you should very seriously go back and read through this interaction now that it's been a couple days. this guy schooled the shit out of you. it was like watching Ip Man. he did some shit I've never seen people do, and I pretty solely come onto the internet to argue with people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 06:39 PM
1

I just want to say that you think good. and your dogged tenacity warms my heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 06:34 PM
1

friend of mine got mad because we were having a discussion about identity and I was arguing about specific word usage. welcome to philosophy, motherfucker.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 06:31 PM
1

blame my faulty memory. I am but a man.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 11:03 PM
1

no I absolutely disagree, because those women are oftentimes not homeless when they are courted. they have families and networks of support, etc. that homeless people obviously do not have. they might be unemployed, and the men might be economically superior to them, but they are not homeless. so your argument is faulty. homeless=homeless, not "functionally homeless", whatever the fuck you think that's supposed to mean. you know, I was a staunch defender of this sub. people have been saying for …
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:28 PM
3

this seems to have almost happened overnight. I remember like 3 months ago, I was looked at like the aggressive hot head.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:49 PM
0

oh man, I'm talking about like, living on the street homeless. guarantee you if I had a car I was living out of I'd still manage to hook up with girls. if that one guy in NYC, who does live on the street, can do it, so can I. thanks for not coming at me like a prick though.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:21 PM
1

well we're talking about the modern world, 1, and two, that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. all housewives were homeless before they were married. you cannot possibly believe that.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:18 PM
3

this sub has been disappointing me lately. not this thread, specifically, this isn't really a big deal at all. but I've been encountering more and more ludicrous shit.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:03 PM
-3

there's a Vice (I think) mini documentary on YouTube about this homeless kid (25 or so) who, on a daily basis, hooks up with a new girl to sleep in a bed at night. actually a really great watch, interesting character! but again, the fact that women don't date homeless men seems kind of pointless to mention in the face that almost nobody even looks at homeless people. also, I don't really see men lining up to date homeless women, so.... yeah.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:45 AM
1

oh certainly.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:25 AM
-2

this couldn't be more irrelevant, as far as I can tell. you don't see homeless men interacting with anybody, really.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 11:46 PM
-6

have never met a reasonable person who would think this, feminists included. I think the more common denominator between this particular population is "crazy", not "feminist" or "woman".
/r/MensRights25/04/15 11:05 PM
1

looks like I'm the minority opinion on the matter anyway, so.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 09:31 PM
-4

yeah... so the title has a loose association but the actual content of the article has, again, nothing to do with mens rights. you should try to sound like less of an asshole when this is such a ridiculously simple issue. this belongs on facebook, not the front page of our sub.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 09:05 PM
-3

this isn't related whatsoever to mens rights. beautiful story, not really appropriate for this sub though. unfortunately I'm gonna have to downvote this. it is touching.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 08:39 PM
5

no offense but i think the world isn't gonna be swinging that direction in the future when energy is a surplus commodity and not a resource we have to actively pursue.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 07:09 PM
1

do you blame a school/the teachers..... multiplication? sometimes.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 07:05 PM
0

upvote for strict logic.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 07:05 PM
0

who the fuck are you people interacting with.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 07:02 PM
1

would it have to alternate to be deemed binary? are there multiple definitions of binary? EDIT: ignore this it all gets cleared up lower down the string
/r/MensRights23/04/15 08:56 PM
-1

but my joke about how death is preferable to being alive is in the negatives.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 10:37 PM
-6

i disagree. i was dead for 13 billion years and it never bothered me in the slightest. the moment i was alive I started having problems. this shit sucks.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 05:13 PM
-8

some people straight up aren't built slender. I'm long and thin but a lot of my friends, both male and female, are more squat than I. hell, I'm still pretty thick compared to some gazelle lookin motherfuckers I see.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 10:04 PM
9

the problem is that the women who ultimately get shit done are the radical ones nobody likes, but nobody seems to be doing anything to stop them. also the guy who replied to you before me pretty much sealed your coffin tightly.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 12:08 AM
40

so let's call ourselves "men's rights."
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:48 PM
1

yeah I've done this whole song and dance of "getting people to take me seriously through argumentation" and I've realized its almost exactly pointless to actually do so, for a variety of reasons. the first are a multitude of insurmountable philosophical dilemmas that imprison me from "the truth", so I can never actually be sure of what I say unless I decide to be on my own, with no actual justification or "knowledge", a term for which we do not have a consistent definition. the second is that pe…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 01:30 PM
1

MR and tumblrinaction are basically frustration porn for me
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:42 AM
2

they're "terrible people" if I say they are. to me, at least.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:38 AM
1

what gets me is that people need to see a woman say this. if it was a guy... why, its almost the exact same unconscious response that sends men to prison at a higher rate than women.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:58 AM
1

I see a lot of similarities between atheists and the MRA movement: consistently slandered nobody gives a shit about our opinion basically counter culture what we're trying to do right now is like convincing the united states that Christianity isn't correct.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 01:19 PM
1

i couldnt give a shit about privileges
/r/MensRights26/02/15 12:53 AM
1

your empathy levels are too low, please report to an emotion station.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 06:13 PM
0

you've got a pretty twisted look at how society is supposed to work. in my opinion, it is the duty of others to make sure people are educated. children don't really make the best decisions you know
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:45 PM
2

a large majority of the people who don't do the things you mention, were never taught to do those things you mention.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 03:48 PM
1

i think we yelled at each other once. seems kind of silly in hindsight. but only because you agree with me now
/r/MensRights19/02/15 03:30 AM
1

isn't that, basically, what our system of laws say? you fucked up so now we're gonna fuck you up
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:42 PM
1

so I wrestled in high school and always encountered this: [combat sport] looks a lot like sex and I always wondered why nobody ever thinks: man, sex looks a lot like a [combat sport] shit gets rough in bed
/r/MensRights15/02/15 11:28 PM
3

you could say the same thing about God ba dum tish please get the joke
/r/MensRights15/02/15 11:26 PM
1

not really an excuse, but shit happens.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 10:46 PM
2

live in new Orleans, thanks for that info
/r/MensRights15/02/15 10:39 PM
1

in such a fashion as to actually have sex with her afterwards, too
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:15 AM
2

get drunk with friends got into car to drive home leave my friends driveway wake up in bed don't know how I got there not proud of it, but no memories drunk me has driven a car successfully. just adding that to evidence.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:01 AM
2

when they advocate anti homosexual stances, then I believe the comparison is apt.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:14 PM
4

I guess it's the same way we persecute the KKK
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:15 PM
3

because there's a "best way to do it" if you have certain goals in mind, and he believes he has the "best way to do it" given certain goals, probably "fairness" or some other ideal. so, from his perspective, he understands the best way to do it. kind of like how a chess master would understand the best moves to make in chess, with his wisdom beating our ignorance. now, if we disagree on the goal, if fairness isn't what we're shooting for, then his opinion ceases to be wisdom, from your perspecti…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:06 PM
-1

honestly if you can't figure out how to live comfortably on $75k a year then you're fucking dumb. you have $75k/year with which you can figure out how to live on $75k/year. you could go to the internet and figure out how to do it by asking any of us fucks on reddit in less than half an hour. having the willpower and motivation to actually go along with the plan is one thing, but physically being unable to devise a plan on how to live comfortably at $75k/year... I'm sorry but you're stupid.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:49 PM
1

clearly the appropriate response is to get really pissed and stop thinking. how could you possibly live your life the way you do. I'm disappointed.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 03:01 PM
1

i was really hungry, tired and broke and my lady friend ordered chinese food for us. i was so thankful
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:57 PM
7

holy shit I'm gonna do this.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:56 PM
3

from the dawn of civilization how could you possibly know this
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:54 PM
2

this woman is amazing.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:37 PM
1

... there's nothing painful about sitting with your genitals in your lap, and that's what I consider normal seating. "this is how a man sits" is as stupid as saying "this is how a man talks", and you blocking me is basically an acceptance of defeat in my eyes.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:13 AM
0

"normal" there is no such thing as this. what about Indian style? the thing we did before we invented the chair?
/r/MensRights15/01/15 12:08 AM
0

this is the stupidest thing anyone has ever said.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 10:54 PM
0

.... if your genitals weren't large enough to make it above your thighs, then it wouldn't work. this is actually the perfect strategy for someone with above average genitals. lastly, your reply was just dumb and defensive.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:11 AM
2

I think he might actually be retarded.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:09 AM
1

I do this! my arms are long so it acts as a routing device for foot traffic. only use one arm though so I can turn sideways to sneak through gaps.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:24 PM
2

the trick is to align your front tires with the front tires of the vehicle you're trying to get behind. most people are shit at parking though, so don't feel too bad.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:18 PM
0

seriously though just put your genitals above your thighs. why would you sit with your balls between your legs? I figured this out when I was in 6th grade.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:17 PM
1

I kind of have a hard time extending the social obligation that are morals to entities that do not have the capacity to understand the obligation. case in point: cows don't give a fuck about me, or humans, can't plan into the future to navigate this twisted obstacle course we call existence. TL;DR fuck cows EDIT: we could grow meat in a lab, a triumph of our pity to the lower entities and of efficiency.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 03:06 PM
1

is a public toilet seat more... dangerous, I guess is the word, for women than it is for men, due to the nature of the whole "basically an open wound" thing? if not, this shouldn't be fucking happening.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:54 PM
0

they join artificial have friends clubs because they need to artificially have friends.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:46 PM
2

is this serious. please tell me this is not serious.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:42 PM
3

the scene in eastern promises, with viggo mortenson, when he fights those two dudes while he's naked in a sauna, is pretty jarring for exactly this reason. everybody knows you don't fuck with each other in the bathroom. also, "psycho", etc.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:40 PM
-1

i think you're either 14 or 65. EDIT: there's just too much sweeping generalization in here to do anything good.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:30 PM
2

I'd like to think my charisma score is pretty high. luckily my parents make many moneys and help insulate me from shit like this. also, I'm employed with a job that pays pretty good. but I appreciate your sentiment. merry Christmas dog
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:51 PM
1

maybe, just maybe, the fault lies with the transmitter, and not the receiver? if you're going to try and change people's minds you should at least try to be effective about it. that's the "obligation" I speak of. edit: I also am suspect of the person who calls other people names amidst a discussion. if I'm a "dumbass college student" I guess I'll call you an old, crotchety, obsolete retard. how far is this getting us, collectively? the answer is not very. you need to work on your communication s…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 10:37 PM
2

I've had sex with her. months ago, but I have done it.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:28 PM
2

and none of them lied to fit in?
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:26 PM
3

I do look both ways before crossing the street. consider this the equivalent of looking both ways and seeing a lot of traffic.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:25 PM
1

the social obligation to your fellow citizens isn't enough for you? if you care enough to argue, you care enough to change people's minds. you could just do it better than what you just did. or you can continue wasting your precious time calling people dumb and wondering why they won't listen to you.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:23 PM
2

eeehhh, I think there's a difference between judging one, specific woman, with a clear track record of lying, obfuscation, and morally underhanded tactics, and feeling this way about all women. I actually have two female roommates attempting to leave illegally, I'm only afraid of one of them.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:21 PM
1

lol, the new self defense class is sweeping the nation! "Bruce Banner's 'Hulk Out' Urban Defense System"
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:55 AM
1

you can do better than this. you're better than this.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:46 AM
5

and if she accuses me of rape? this is kind of like you giving me a box with a button on it that, when pressed, has a 1/10,000 chance to kill me, or give me v$250 I really am not interested in pressing that button. $250 is not worth it.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:36 AM
1

you know, you kind of have a point. I'm a guy, I put my genitals in my lap when I sit down. now I can cross my legs, squeeze them together, clap with my knees all day. and it doesn't hurt because I moved my genitals out of the way. I figured this out when I was in 6th grade. it actually intrigues me to know that not all men have discovered this simple solution. EDIT: like being the first guy who ever wiped his ass, or shook his penis after urinating.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:32 AM
3

lol seriously? are you sure?
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:06 AM
2

lmao for the longest time I thought you were saying "Feminists are angry women, they don't get raped a lot" as if them being angry was like a rape shield or something.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 11:01 AM
0

you seem so smugly satisfied, and it's funny, because you have no idea what's happening. you're not fuckin batman, lol
/r/MensRights14/12/14 05:11 PM
0

it's this type of accusatory behavior that I'd expect from children.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:48 PM
1

I'd pay money to see somebody drive-by a deer with a prius. haha!
/r/MensRights10/12/14 02:19 PM
1

you'd have to prove he's doing it to raise his own personal reputation. seeing as it's impossible to know what's going on in his head, you should probably just sssshhhhh. EDIT: or find a better definition.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 02:17 PM
0

lol maybe you should take a step back and calm down, bud
/r/MensRights10/12/14 02:03 PM
1

i heard a hip hop remix of the song Jingle Bells the other day. I was wrong, before. cultural appropriation does exist, and it is sickening.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:40 PM
1

there are true facts, yes, we agree.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:53 PM
3

lol I hope you give a lot of your money to Anita.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 05:03 PM
-1

don't know why you're downvoted for this.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:52 PM
2

can I get the source of this quote? Jesus fucking Christ
/r/MensRights02/12/14 05:48 PM
1

"Countries around the world differ in how they deal with the mens rea element in the law regarding rape, (i.e. the accused must be aware that the victim is not consenting or might not be consenting), and in how they place the onus of proof with regard to belief of consent." so... it could still be rape, even if the woman doesn't know he isn't consenting. unless we're using American law as the pinnacle of social structure
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:34 PM
1

"Countries around the world differ in how they deal with the mens rea element in the law regarding rape, (i.e. the accused must be aware that the victim is not consenting or might not be consenting), and in how they place the onus of proof with regard to belief of consent." just so you know it's not as obvious as you're portraying it
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:30 PM
0

so you're saying I can rape a quadriplegic mute and since she cannot express nonconsent, I didn't actually rape her? I'm almost certain you don't have to say "no" for it to be rape.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:14 PM
0

i think in this situation, much like the law, ignorance of the rules doesn't grant you immunity to the consequences of breaking them.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 02:05 AM
3

eeeehhhh you should take another look at exactly what transpired here.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 02:00 AM
1

I also asked if there was a precedent in such cases! but I was just banned, no answers. I still thank that's a bit out of control.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:20 PM
0

that seriously might be one of the ugliest shirts I've ever seen, though.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 10:24 PM
-2

some women commit suicide after being raped. i don't really see where you're going with, with this, and this whole "comparing two completely separate life events by their 'worsity'" just seems silly. tell me, how many units of "well, that sucked" do you get when you're raped? how many units do you get when you're falsely accused? right.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 01:51 PM
1

please give me a universally applicable metric by which we can judge this woman as "evil". don't use that word, it's useless.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 01:49 PM
1

in the same vein, you cannot quantify "help", either. lol exactly how many units of helpful are you giving me when you help move my couch?
/r/MensRights27/09/14 10:51 AM
7

I think it's fair to say that all people, universally, have issues. that's a really broad, umbrella term. EDIT: some people's issues include "I don't have food or clean water", other people's issues include "I don't know what to do with all of my money".
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:03 AM
1

first of all, what do we even mean by "right"? I will agree with you that might gets things done, but whether or not those were the correct things to do is a completely separate issue, and the idea that we can even approach what "right" or "correct", or "what we should do" is another separate issue. and the idea that we can justify our actions is another separate issue. so yeah. power = productivity, but productivity (specific productivity, we ultimately have to be "productive") isn't necessaril…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:34 PM
1

the general consensus seems to be that you're the uneducated dick wasting both of our times. good work.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:41 PM
1

might doesn't actually make right, is the thing. it just means power. power means you get your way, but it doesn't mean you're right. it just means you got what you wanted done. which is important, sure, but not exactly what you're saying.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:40 PM
5

this is an incredible non answer. thank you for wasting both of our times.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:59 PM
1

I don't think you have the body of knowledge necessary to make the claims you are making, and I don't have the body of knowledge necessary to refute them. but really, you're the one who has to support the idea that we need gender roles today. I disagree. please support your perspective.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:58 PM
8

so I should force my son to live in a sterilized bubble? gotcha. EDIT: just so it's clear through my snarky sarcasm, I am comparing making your child a "bubble boy" to cutting off bits of his dick. both are stupid, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:46 PM
1

why do we have to force men into those roles? we have robots now. a quadcopter with an LMG and FoF identification technology (basically what Facebook uses to recognize faces) would be fucking horrible to fight as anything made out of meat, regardless of gender. I'd say that gender roles in the past were necessary, but so was the rape of the environment through the industrial revolution, which isn't exactly a good thing.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:52 PM
1

oh, i thought you would start. uh... women have been disenfranchised to a certain extent more than men through history? is that good enough
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:50 PM
1

i think the worst part about this is that neither of us are actually idiots, but when you (and you did start this) start spouting off about how someone who disagrees with you must be stupid, you start some shit that is not productive. so, sorry. you're not dumb, but you knew that already.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:37 AM
1

and they're simply wrong SHOW, DON'T TELL. this is like basic 5th grade writing type shit and I can't believe anyone who fancies themselves an intellectual could behave like this. I could say you're simply wrong and act like a smarmy cunt (aka, you) and where would that get us? more pissing in the wind, how productive. youre basically arguing for a purely materialist viewpoint. I don't think you're wrong but please understand that this shit is not as clear cut as you're making it out to be. you …
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:15 AM
1

No. you didn't address my point here. not saying you're wrong in what you said, but you weren't addressing what I said. I think I speak for the majority of this board when I say the idea of gender roles is not necessarily a good one. it was good enough to get us where we are right now, but so was mercantilism and war, so.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:10 AM
1

lol sorry for such a late reply, but I am pretending to be a feminist. I mean, I'm just gonna devil's advocate. so yeah. hit me with your best shot, dog.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:09 AM
1

mmm so when exactly was materialism proven true? last time I checked the ultimate state of reality is up in the air, and evidence based reasoning can't account for itself. but I guess you don't care about that. and it's more like me telling you to try and test your ideas against someone who legitimately thinks you're wrong. I'm a materialist and I find it hard to argue against it because I am it. wokeupabug is not a materialist and is incredibly smart, so that's the person you want to argue with…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:08 AM
2

you're a pretty smart person. +1
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:06 AM
1

yeah you are the worst person to argue with I've ever encountered. just because you say I'm stupid doesn't mean I'm stupid. you have to show, not tell. but I really don't think you're going to have the intellectual honesty to address your own argumentative shortcomings, so you can go fuck yourself? yeah i think that works fine. PS: go talk to /u/wokeupabug about religion. just send her a PM about how you think all religions are debunked because they don't have physical evidence to justify their …
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:22 PM
1

because I actually have a spine, I'll fill you in on the bits you don't understand or haven't thought about. any classical theist will tell you that an argument is evidence, and the weight of philosophy would agree with them. so when someone proposes an argument for God that is evidence for it, and you need defeaters blah blah the standard art of debate. the idea that physical evidence, or the lack thereof, universally defeats the hypothesis of god, is just a fucking dumb idea, and it's clear to…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:19 PM
1

well somebody has no idea how to argue, do they?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:15 PM
1

I don't think you're replying to what he's saying.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:12 PM
1

pretend that someone is me!
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:04 PM
1

more harm than good how do you measure this? I don't necessarily disagree with you, but it seems hard to say that with any sort of tenuity. but i see your point. I'll have to try and spread those ideas around, see if they catch on.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:04 PM
1

men and women are complementary this is ultimately the answer. such as? well, for whatever reason, there was a political climate that refused to grant rights to women that men had. you can say it's because men have more responsibility and less privilege, but the point is that women weren't granted the same rights as men. so they had to petition the government for those rights. i don't know why they weren't granted the same rights as men (i really don't think people in the past were looking at th…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 03:01 PM
1

I've always found people receptive to the plight of their fellow men. I usually bring up specific MRA points like the higher rates of suicide, that guy who got a blowjob and was ordered by the court to pay for child support when the woman inseminated herself, etc. and that tends to win people over. but i simply cannot oppose feminism in its entirety, because I don't even know what the entirety of feminism is.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:56 PM
1

i don't see why we need to justify it well... then you don't necessarily need to justify any of your beliefs. i believe homosexuals are evil, don't have to justify it, just do it. i believe blacks are the sons of satan here to topple the world order with a satanic cult blah blah any number of stupid shit. justification for your positions is generally a good idea, even though Munchausen's Trilemma says it's basically impossible with current methods. so I guess you don't need to justify it because…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:54 PM
1

... so do it? you can't just tell me that type of shit and peace out, lol
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:52 PM
1

people have already disagreed with you on the definition of feminism, while telling me what the definition of feminism is.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:52 PM
1

people have disagreed with you in this thread already, about the definition of feminism. there are even Christians who don't believe in a divine jesus if my memory serves me correctly. and like.. if someone identifies as a feminist who are you to tell them otherwise? that's kind of the issue. regardless of whatever absurdity they've built the idea from, regardless of how much they agree with the concept of a patriarchy, if they identify as feminist there isn't anything we can do to stop them. we…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:50 PM
2

well somebody didn't read the entire post, did they? also, what do you mean by "evidence", why are you coming from such a materialist biased standpoint, blah blah any number of what I think stupid arguments to continue to justify religion in the absence of replicatable physical evidence. EDIT: and then there's the whole "evidential materialism is self refuting" bit, because you have no physical evidence to suggest the reality we interact with is actually reality. but no, I've never been around t…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:47 PM
1

disprove their claims of god the problem is that most of them are unfalsifiable claims, which are generally frowned upon in the first place, but let's not piss in each other's faces over something we'll ultimately agree on. I mean, yeah, feminism is nebulous, and that's what makes it so difficult to oppose universally. it has no unified definition, it has no ultimate ground floor of rules or codes or ideas. you just said it yourself, you can't begin to discredit it unless you're given a truly co…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:45 PM
3

Well, if the dilemma I've provided proves to be a true dilemma (which you seem to disagree with and I'm having a hard time not agreeing with what you've proposed here) then it would require a certain.. shift in a lot of our member's stances. I've always thought establishing the most rigorous logical base was a noble endeavor and I would like to see that happen with our members. I don't even know what we'd do instead, or what that shift would require, or anything else besides the idea that certai…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 02:40 PM
1

just to let you know, I edited my first reply to you.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 10:20 PM
1

reading, this looks pretty juicy. EDIT: i think the main point of contention would be to point out that your A and B dichotomy could be levied against blacks in the same way you've levied it against women. either A: black people are not equal to whites and needed the government to help them gain equality or B: that the civil rights movement was not about equality. It's kind of hard to parse that. not just with a sense of political correctness but also because it just.. seems untrue. i think ther…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 10:09 PM
2

hey, I DIDN'T ASK FOR THIS
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:59 PM
1

I don't think you understand how analogies work. EDIT: or how debate works. you ignored just about everything I've said.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:21 PM
1

just to illustrate exactly it is what you're doing. this is you: this picture serves as a placeholder for your argument just replace all the religious stuff with feminist stuff, and it's pretty much exactly what your argument is. feminism is bad because of all this abhorrent terror, blah blah blah. you're cherry picking. you are fundamentally ignoring all the good things feminism may have ever done. now, if you can find me an argument that would consistently, across the board, condemn religion a…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:03 PM
1

the "that's not my feminism" argument is inane, annoying, but correct. that's the fucking problem you're not seeing with your argument, you dolt. false equivalence what's funny is that people on this board almost constantly refer to feminism as some sort of religious ideology, so I don't think it's a false equivalence to argue that feminism is much like religion. and since it is a nebulous cloud of ideas capable of being used to attack or defend any position at any time, it will be impossible fo…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:43 PM
1

blah blah ignore everything i say blah blah blah.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:43 AM
13

I hear you. some people don't deserve to play with the rest of us, but sorting them is always the issue.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:47 PM
1

no, what you're stupidly focusing on is all the negative aspects, in the same way I've stupidly focused on all the negative aspects of religion, in order to suit the argument you're proposing. either you understand that you're making mistakes with this argument or you can fuck the fuck off, I'm done explaining this to you.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:23 PM
1

well you're smatter than me so you probably have a better insight on the matter. but I've never really seen the anti theist argument play out in a satisfying way. there's too many theisms, just like there's too many feminisms. my main argument against feminism isn't that's it's bad, or harms men as it's ultimate byproduct, but that it's a nebulous cloud of ideas that can, have, and will be used to attack or defend any position at any time. so I guess that is bad? and by "bad" I mean I don't like…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:10 PM
0

luckily for me there is no objective unit of "helpfulness" or "harmfulness" so this comparison you're asking me to do is pointless. has feminism not disenfranchised men, even once? then it's not all about the disenfranchisement of men. period.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 12:59 PM
0

the same way the catholic church is all about the rape of underage boys. period. only, that's not what it only does and you're cherry picking.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:29 AM
0

"feminists" are whoever identifies as a feminist. the problem with what you're doing, and the problem I've run into for years at /r/debatereligion (I'm an anti-theist and argue religion is bad, the same way you're anti-feminist and argue feminism is bad) is that, well... the arguments for anti-theism kind of fall on their face. /u/wokeupabug would happily explain why you can't really make arguments like this with any validity. /u/captaincastle and /u/Dudesan will attest to the tenacity and rigor…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:13 AM
0

tell that to my feminist friend, who will openly admit to the idea that men are forced into harmful gender roles by society, and would openly agree to just about all the points we bring up about disproportionate homelessness, workplace deaths, incarceration, suicides, etc.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:26 AM
1

well, your useless anecdote is countered by my useless anecdote, where I went on a date with a bright young woman (who I assume to be a feminist, although I haven't asked) and she paid for her meal. she was also pretty receptive toward the idea that a man can be fucked by the law when it comes to getting a woman pregnant, either by accident or outright malicious deception. so yeah. take that!
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:18 PM
1

I'm not saying my feelings are hurt. I'm saying you should conduct yourself more maturely. Not going off and insulting people over a difference of opinion, stuff like that. and I'm not sure how your "this is the internet" statement defends you from your childish actions. are we all supposed to just browbeat one another because this is the internet? how productive of discussions are you trying to have in the first place?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:25 PM
2

then why the fuck are you even talking to me? why would you open your fuckin mouth if you're not trying to convince other people?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:55 PM
1

did you know that everyone also has biases? or is that some out of left field shit you're going to argue against, too?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:54 PM
1

and I check out your link and it's a lot of opinions. I disagree. that might be the bottom floor of this conversation. but thank you for insulting me, that was totally necessary. it really helped elucidate the fact that you were right. I can see why international academics frequently do it, it is surely the best way to go about the debate process.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:50 PM
1

this is pretty weak trolling, you can do better than that.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:41 PM
1

no, I'm arguing because I'm right and I want you to also be right. how many other users will it take to shake this completely unfounded belief of yours that "agenda" is a negative word, explicitly defining deceptive, underhanded obfuscation? because there is nothing to the word that relegates it solely to that position.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:38 PM
1

rats have both of those things. ravens are capable of deceit, which means they can imagine someone else's point of view, and they know what information that person does or doesn't have. I should kill people because I can kill people, then.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:35 PM
1

someone hasn't taken a philosophy class before, have they? that's a really condescending reply that doesn't help you reach a better understanding, but it felt good to do. anyway: you're committing the phenomenological fallacy by assuming there is anything "looking" out of my eyes. this is far from the truth of the matter, in which my eyes are looking. the body we have labeled as "me" is seeing by virtue of having eyes. there's no theater inside of my skull that a "me" sits inside, getting playba…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 01:34 PM
2

i love this.
/r/PussyPass02/09/14 10:53 PM
1

Well, yeah, you are knocking down a strawman, when, through the course of the conversation, my position has changed. sorry my position changed, but I do make mistakes from time to time. and I now see your point. I must have misread. EDIT: I find it interesting that you take a whole bunch of time to educate me on the matter and still claim that you "don't care what I believe". I care about what other people believe. is that like, a bad thing to do?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:32 PM
1

I see your point, I was wrong. but I still don't see this as a problem, and since it seems to be a more accurate portrayal of reality, then that's the one we should go with in my opinion. we'd still have to have conversations about the sorts of things we want people to end up doing, and which things we don't, and how to engineer the society to give the conditions to get the results we want. which seems to be an ethical conversation, kinda.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:29 PM
3

this reply is entertaining because of how comically unaware he is of himself.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:59 PM
2

ah, but you do! your plan just then was to get me to accept the idea that you don't have a plan! but, in doing so, you had a plan! so you're either a liar or confused. i'd rather believe you're confused, to give you the benefit of doubt.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:52 PM
-1

what is it that you believe separates us from cattle? until you can give me something that makes me "above" cattle, I'm not. I mean, in my opinion, I'm better than a cow. I can write and cows can't and that's why we enslaved them as food. just how it goes, the universe is a pretty rough spot. but with any level of objectivity? I fart and piss like a cow, I gather in herds like a cow, I eat food and fuck like a cow... I'm pretty much a cow. I'm like ~95% a cow. biologists haven't even come up wit…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:49 PM
4

... that's a fucking synonym for the word agenda? do you know what "synonym" means? exactly, if not very close to, the same meaning. so yeah I think everyone has an agenda. in this conversation right now, I have an agenda, and it's to get you to realize that everyone has an agenda. an "agenda" doesn't have to be some underhanded, corrupt shit, and I think you should broaden your understanding instead of trying to browbeat me into agreeing with yours.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:44 PM
1

I have disputed your notion that all wealthy elites are in fact men Emphasis mine. notice that I (although originally may have said that) didn't say that in my last response, or the one before that. you're addressing a strawman. the rest of your post is gold... at knocking down a strawman. I mean, it's actually really good stuff, you're just not addressing what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:42 PM
-3

well, I'm a fatalist (I've just learned, oddly enough) and I see no reason to believe that ethical discussions are "irrelevant". discussions about what humans should and shouldn't do are important to have. just that now they're considerably more complicated. but, perhaps, more well informed of the actual state of the universe. which, to this one, has always seemed a noble endeavor.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:39 PM
10

... no, pretty sure most normal people have a plan. whether or not they hide that plan with obfuscation and deceit is irrelevant to this simple fact.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:27 PM
-2

well, I disagree.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:25 PM
-6

and what's wrong with being a fatalist?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:25 PM
1

well everyone has biases and an agenda. so, no. I have no issue with that whatsoever.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:19 PM
-5

and what if the discussion is useless? what if there is no agency? are we to build ethical systems based off of things we know to be untrue?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:58 PM
-5

eh, wasn't really much of a conversation when you just parrot some shit at me as if I'm simply going to agree. that would be bad and since you're clearly coming from a position of omniscient authority, would you be interested in disseminating your knowledge down to a plebian like me? thanks.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:57 PM
-3

as if we are something other than beasts.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:55 PM
-10

and maybe they shouldn't. I mean, for the last 200,000 years we've held people accountable for their actions and it hasn't necessarily panned out very well. you have to at least have the conversation about this. you can't just shut it down out of some... I don't even know. tradition? incredulity? sure, I don't know how to build a society around what I'm talking about, and you might not either, but I think it would behoove us to try and figure it out. it might be better than what we're doing righ…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:51 PM
-6

I'm going to have to look up this process. I apparently missed it the last time I swung over to "identity's" wikipedia page.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:49 PM
-3

I'd argue that a meaningful conversation about ethics would necessitate a complete revision of what it means to have agency, whether or not we have this agency you speak of, etc. looks like we're just gonna be pissin in the wind at each other on this one. :/
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:47 PM
-4

perceive myself continuously not true! what you actually perceive are "future" states in which you have memories of "previous" states. (future and previous being temporal directions, and not an objective classification of ontological time slices) but this doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the discussion. your own free will what exactly do you mean by "free will"? I contest that this thing doesn't exist. and honestly you're just begging the question. from your perspective, you exist th…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:46 PM
4

"They're comin, Bubs. The shit hawks. they're sweepin down low, gonna come down and drag you off to the big shit nest." drinks entire 5th of whisky
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:04 PM
18

... but all human beings are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control. I'd go so far as to say that I don't even "choose". shit, I don't even know what I means, or if there is such a thing as an "I". nietzsche and hume didn't think there was.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:02 PM
8

they're like anybody else we need to remember this.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:55 PM
1

"until there aren't any left".
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:45 PM
1

I'm not saying it was wealthy, elite men surrounded by destitute men and women. what I am asking is why have the majority of elites been men? throughout history. do you simply not know why? I feel like that would be an easier answer to give than this runaround.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:10 PM
1

so to counter that, let's send innocent women to jail! that's insane, dog
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:36 PM
1

and again, I get what you're saying. but why is it that the handful of wealthy elites are, and have been, mostly men?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 01:35 PM
1

I go as deep as the rabbit hole does, lol. but this is already starting to be a fun discussion! those are two contradictory statements! therefore, there must be a truth but what if, in saying "there is no truth", what we're really saying is that "the statement 'there is no truth' accords with reality", or in not overly complicated terms, "the statement 'there is no truth' is true", not that it is truth itself. because if it were truth itself then, yes, by my and your admission that is contradict…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 08:33 PM
1

all of our conversations are basically bubbling into the same thing, so I'll just leave you to reply to my longest, wordiest post. sorry that this ended up happening. however, specifically: truth is that which is real truth conforms to reality those two statements appear to be at odds with one another. one one hand, both of us granting the assertion that we live in a multi-dimensional system of forces and particles, etc, we have in front of me a table on which my keyboard sits. this table is rea…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:24 PM
1

not in accordance with reality what is this "reality"? the hard problem of solipsism has, as far as I can remember, not been surmounted. I wouldn't even necessarily disagree with you on your definition, either. it's just that we, you and I, have no justification whatsoever for the assertion that "reality is x". and I promise you I'd agree with you on the definition you'd put down, too. it's just... a fundamentally insurmountable problem that we have. just like the fundamentally insurmountable pr…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:17 PM
2

very excite.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:05 PM
1

but why did men have the wealth, and therefore, the power?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 06:03 PM
2

hope your computer is alright.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:59 PM
1

what exactly do you mean by "wrong"? sorry, I know I'm annoying.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:46 PM
1

i disagree with your idea that there is "truth". i will immediately say that there are "true facts", statements about reality that are "true". but this "truth" is right out. like, is it a ledger of all true facts? what is "truth" composed of? does it interact with the physical world in any way? sorry. just wanted to bring some philosophy to the discussion.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:44 PM
1

my question is: do we really want to put innocent women in jail to prove a point? do we really want to stoop to that level?
/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:00 PM
1

I realized about 3 days ago that it doesn't matter: what your moral scheme is whether or not you're right logic arguments legal codes and systems and that the only things that matter are: how many people can you convince if you have the power to do what you want done as an idealist, this is tragedy. but as an absurdist, it's comedy! sometimes I just want to die and that's funny.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:47 PM
2

do we have a name of the exact group that got the government to do this? do we have records of that group speaking about the film? preferably in english because I'm an uncultured fuck.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:18 PM
1

well that's because this sub doesn't need you to tell us that women aren't evil.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 03:06 PM
1

it's not even legal to hit men.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 02:23 PM
4

I'm almost certain I was in that very same thread. I got banned. this was DebateAMR, right?? yeah I got banned the first night I showed up. EDIT: apparently, LPS would be used by men to force women to have abortions they didn't want. which is wrong. but it's totally ok to have men forced to pay child support to children they don't want. very equal and fair.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 02:16 PM
1

you must have had wonderful sexual encounters. :/
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:10 PM
3

you can make this analogy with any person.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:23 PM
4

"That feeling you call 'love', Morty? that's just a chemical cocktail in the brain that compels animals to breed. it hits hard and fast, and then slowly fades, leaving you stranded in a failing marriage. I did it, your parents are doing it. break the cycle Morty: focus on science." Rick Sanchez of Earth Dimension C-137
/r/MensRights20/08/14 07:22 PM
6

The person who wrote this isn't particularly honest.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:56 PM
2

that sounds like a terrible movie. I've got a friend who loves horror movies, has Faces of Death on his coffee room table, and I doubt even he would be interested in watching this movie.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:03 PM
-1

are you, by chance, a philosoraptor? but yeah this sub is like concentrated frustrate-porn and I am addicted to it.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:50 PM
1

surprisingly, yes
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:26 PM
2

ask mance raider
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:55 AM
5

wait this bitch lives in New Orleans? I live in the same city as this woman. I feel... I feel dirty.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:29 PM
26

seriously, I was 18, freshman in college, and I heard about the "men's rights" subreddit and I was almost disgusted. "how could... we already have all the rights?!" I basically shouted in frustration, ready to come in here with valiant keystroking efforts to change all of your minds. and then I actually came here. and I learned. and became enraged. all anybody has to do is actually come here for themselves.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:27 PM
1

it's probably just a language issue then. no need to go further than that
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:14 PM
1

I still think you should be saying something like "there's something incoherent/incongruous in here" instead of "I don't like" again.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:45 PM
2

but it is a way to improve the trajectory of his ass into his room to grab his shit.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:00 PM
0

.... I... I think I dated a girl with BPD. can confirm, was fucking crazy. so hot though. EDIT: god damnit... I dated her for three years. the last two years were horrible. first one was actually pretty amazing, I can't lie. but it was less of a "relationship" and more of a "refuckinship"
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:56 PM
3

i agree with wanked in space... we should defend anyone who is falsely accused of rape, even if they are openly in admittance of being an asshole. EDIT: just because you don't like him? that's not a very good metric now is it
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:38 PM
2

my friend made a joke on 4chan about shooting up a school. he was put on house arrest for a year.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:35 PM
1

we have different levels of the severity of murder for a reason, I see nothing indicating that we cannot create these levels of severity for rape. hell, we even have levels of severity for theft. i actually think we should implement different severity levels for even more crimes, so that the punishment can fit them more exactly.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:26 PM
1

lol need any other teachers?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:09 AM
1

you don't get to make up the law as you go along isn't that exactly what our species does, though?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:51 PM
3

this is a key point. I can't really say I blame the guy but we shouldn't be hitting each other.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:26 PM
5

you're naked walking through your house and you pass in front of a fan. the breeze on your balls sends you to the ground in horror. that must suck.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 11:23 PM
1

and that's about as red herring as you can get.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:22 AM
1

I'm sorry, but you have to be willfully delusional, insane, or idiotic to think that knowledge of rape prevention is a bad idea. now, I'm not saying that we shouldn't teach our children (both boys and girls) valuable lessons about consent and personal space, you know, kind of like what we're doing right now. in fact, if we didn't teach our children this basic kindergarten shit we'd be bad parents. but if you honestly think that adding helpful information to this system in the form of even genera…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:43 PM
3

and just as I too have called men and women "bitches" and "cunts". hell, I've called people niggers at a 27+:1 ratio of " non-black" to "black", where the one black person I jokingly called that was my good friend and roommate. does this make nigger a non racial slur? despite my attempts to make it so, it hasn't really panned out.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:23 PM
3

you could show us that what you claimed happened actually occurred, to start.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:19 PM
1

but what if I want to have conversations with fellow black atheists? I can't create a place where conversations like that can happen easily and more readily accessible to people looking for them?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:14 PM
1

I think this is a bit extreme. people have a natural inclination to form groups of similar and like minded individuals. sometimes, women want to only talk to women. sometimes men only want to talk to men. I think it's perfectly acceptable to have places where those preferred conversations can take place, simply for ease of access. like, I don't think when a girl wants to ask only women how to shave their vagina that she's sexist. she just only wants to ask women about vagina shaving. it would be…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:10 PM
1

do you even have a consistent platform or are you just yelling at anything you can type at? do you remember what you say two posts up? because from what it seems, you have no consistent platform and are only arguing with ad-hoc bullshit with no relevance to previous positions. only seeking to win the current wave of rebuttal. basically you're like a fundamentalist Christian.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:38 PM
1

lol this is surprisingly accurate
/r/RedPillWomen12/07/14 08:48 PM
1

so if I stab you...?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:07 AM
1

never seen the comics so the performance is non contextual. i liked what he brought to the table.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 03:51 AM
1

i thought the kingpin was excellently cast.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:19 PM
10

dude, it's only 8am. that's too many feels this early.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 01:13 PM
7

weneed to all complain about this. this is bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 01:43 PM
3

yeah, philosophical awareness!
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:42 PM
1

why don't you educate yourself on what the burden of proof is. you shouldn't call people stupid. EDIT: oh, what's that? you have to support your own position? my mind, it hurts!
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:12 PM
0

they have examples of aforementioned fates worse than death. that's why I told you to look at it, because it's not like nobody has come up with them. the fact that you said they'd just say what it is led me to believe that you don't know of any popular examples. which is just plain old ignorance on your part.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:34 PM
1

thanks dog. upvote for intellectual honesty.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:45 PM
1

I don't think you understand what it means if you're silly enough to ask something like "do you have any evidence showing my claim to be false". this is not how logic works. it ain't my job to prove your claims wrong, you have to prove them correct, using evidence or argumentation. although Lewis Carroll's tortoise and achilles kind of shoots the idea that you can "prove" something using argumentation but let's not get too deep into this.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:43 PM
0

this conversation isn't going to go anywhere. at least check out the tvtropes page for "fate worse than death"
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:26 PM
2

you don't prove negatives, boyo
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:49 PM
1

i like you.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:47 PM
1

have you ever heard of a fate worse than death? EDIT: what do you mean by "worse"? DOUBLE EDIT: it would actually by hypocritical of me to argue that there are fates "worse" than death in this conversation, as that is also a value judgment. but sometimes, individuals would rather be dead.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 03:36 PM
-1

better guitarist what do you mean by "better"? have you ever taken a philosophy course? this is like, the bottom of the barrel basics. what you're espousing, "rape is worse than murder", is an opinion. opinions are not, and actually cannot be facts. I don't even think an opinion can have a truth value but I'd have to go look that up. and also, Batman's superpower is that he is infinitely prepared, so it is certainly possible that he does always have some green K on him. this is batman we're talk…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:59 PM
0

all it takes is 1 person out of 7 billion to choose the other way and that 100% figure of yours is simply wrong. just go with "a vast majority of people would" instead of this cock-sure, borderline certainty. and there are, I'm sure, countless stories of people who simply gave up and died. not everyone is the same as you.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:54 PM
0

you ever get into an argument about what band is better, or which superhero would win? you're going to get as "objective" in this argument as you would in either of those two.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:45 PM
2

... source?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:40 PM
1

and I thought I liked Vice.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:37 PM
0

100% would choose a bit hasty with that, no?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:34 PM
0

and how exactly do you objectively assess a value judgment?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:33 PM
2

that last one would be pretty fucking rough.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:33 PM
1

references.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:29 PM
1

he lived in the middle east. he probably smoked pot.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:44 PM
3

from now on, I'm going to call giraffes "long rapists"
/r/MensRights22/06/14 04:57 PM
9

just to finish the chain of logic: most homeless are men. EDIT: is it "most"? I feel like it's a vast majority. up to 85% or more. lemme go find some stats. EDIT2: 67.5% of 76% of all homeless people are single males. so .675 x .76 = .513, 51.3% and that's just from the "single and homeless" section. 35% of people with children who are homeless are men, and that makes up 24% of the total population. .35 x .24= .084, 8.4% 51.3+8.4= 59.7% of all homeless are men. a smaller majority than I had esti…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 12:35 PM
-3

good god nobody even knows what the fuck I'm saying. the OP I replied to had muddy language. that's fucking it. that's all I'm trying to get at. we can argue about whether or not it had muddy language. that's all I fucking care about. I'm not on the other side of the issue with anybody on this.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:26 AM
3

therefore unable to decide for himself what is and is not appropriate I mean, that's speculation right there. how far are you willing to take that defense, also? to any arbitrary extreme I can concoct? he is still a child, and should be treated as such yeah, we punish kids who do inappropriate things, right? this kid should have been punished through appropriate authoritative channels. obviously he shouldn't have been fucked by his teacher, but we probably also shouldn't look at propositions for…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:20 AM
-1

this seems like such a simple, innocuous idea that I'm surprised I'm being asked to explain this. if I were to walk up to someone and proposition them for sex, that would be considered an aggressive social maneuver. there are multiple different definitions for the term aggressive and I feel like it actually touches on a number of them. I am attempting to reach a goal as quickly as possible, which means it is an aggressive maneuver. It doesn't seem as if I care about how the person is going to re…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:14 AM
2

why don't we relax for a second and look at what I'm saying. but nagging someone for chips is in a different arena entirely than nagging someone for sex do you agree or disagree with this pretty innocuous statement? do you think propositioning someone for a bite of their sandwich is similar to asking to fuck them? if you agree that they are different, then we agree, and there is no point in this argument anymore. I'm not on the opposite side of the issue with anybody here.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:10 AM
0

a student asking a teacher to have sex with him is inherently aggressive? I'm surprised there is a question mark there. yes, it is aggressive to proposition someone for sex. that's an agressive move. should the woman be excused for her actions? no. did she handle it correctly? no. but let's not pretend like me asking to put my penis inside you is along the same lines as me asking to borrow your pencil or cheat off your homework.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:04 AM
-1

has anyone noticed where I never once said the woman should be excused of her actions? jesus fucking christ guys I'm on your side.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:02 AM
0

when the mother fuck did I say I thought that. you're all fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:59 AM
1

fucking obviously. why does everyone think I don't think that. are you all retarded?
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:59 AM
2

thankfully I don't think this excuses the teacher and never said I thought so in the first place.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:58 AM
-25

crawl back under into your hovel, troll.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:52 PM
-12

but its the wording in the OP dog. it seemed to equivocate between all forms of nagging. again, obviously I'm the only one who saw it this way.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:52 PM
-11

I'm not even complaining that he wasn't punished. (I am, but not in the post you're replying to) My main complaint is that the OP I replied to seems to suggest that someone in her position should have just said "no" to his request to have sex and not even consider it assault or any other form of aggression. asking someone for sex is aggressive. it is inherently more aggressive than asking to borrow a pencil, skimp out on homework, or have a bite of your sandwich. this is probably why those sever…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:36 PM
-18

at this point I think you're arguing just to argue. good day.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:32 PM
-16

I agree, but there was that final line where he basically equivocates between all forms of nagging as "not aggressive". asking for sex is inherently more aggressive than asking for a bite of your sandwich.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:31 PM
-21

in the OP i replied to my wife... a teacher... nagged for fish and chips... doesn't consider it a form of aggression this is a completely separate ball game than being propositioned for sex. the way he phrased it made it out to trivialize what was going on there. she shouldn't have fucked him, she should have told higher ups and had him disciplined. we also shouldn't treat a student asking their teacher for sex the same as asking to get out of homework.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:21 PM
-8

how is this such a radical concept. if i walked up to my teacher in high school and asked her to have sex with me, so much shit would have rained onto my head it wouldn't even be funny. she also shouldn't have fucked him, that's not even up for debate. but you guys are trivializing his actions as if they're the same as nagging someone for chips or to get out of homework. are you serious. EDIT: look at my post history in this sub, I'm no feminist troll spy or whatever.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:18 PM
-26

I'm not saying she did have to comply. In fact, she shouldn't have. what I am saying is that, imo, everyone in this thread is trivializing the behavior of this kid. if she isn't lying, and he was nagging his teacher for sex, that's wholly inappropriate. i've changed my mind. that is punishable. not through the court of law, but domestically. honestly if a kid asked to have sex with a teacher at my high school they probably would have been expelled. which seems fair to me. it's just not appropria…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:55 PM
-38

but nagging someone for chips is in a different arena entirely than nagging someone for sex. it shouldn't be punishable. or should it? I mean, I'm sure a school system would internally punish a student for making explicit sexual advances toward a teacher. EDIT: the reason why I made this comment is because the OP I replied to had language in it that, to me, seemed to equivocate all forms of propositions as benign. I had a problem with that because obviously some propositions are not benign. that…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:24 PM
1

empathy is a learned behavior. which is kinda shitty. we have to train our own species to be nice to each other. like dogs.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:06 PM
0

The fact that it is so ambiguous and so vague means that it can be used for anything by anyone that wants something. like religion, it seems.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 01:00 PM
4

my freshman year of high school history teacher has taught me two things that have stuck in my mind, forever. 1) wars are fought for resources for somebody 2) if you see anyone burning books, run away from that as fast as you can.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:57 PM
1

Say objective things that are true and have happened. I never mention "men's rights" but I always mention that guy who got a bowjob with a condom on and was ordered by the court to pay child support after the girl inseminated herself with his semen from the condom. or how that 14 year old was statutory raped and forced to pay child support. or that 90% of divorces end with women in custody of the child? blows people's minds.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 01:27 PM
1

my senior year of high school i checked out PUA stuff online. torrented a book or two, never finished any of them but browsed. it did help, I mean, I wanted girls to have sex with me and it happened frequently. This might have just been a byproduct of the recent college atmosphere, but the point still stands that when I was an asshole I got laid more and was generally better received socially. the more reasonable, philosophically well rounded, and compassionate I've become for my fellow man, the…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:08 PM
1

"imbalances, by definition, only work in one direction". I suppose this person has never seen a see-saw at a playground, or understands the idea of rotation.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:25 PM
1

I was continuing the previous conversation. sometimes i pay attention, but not much. today was a good day.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:21 PM
1

those places aren't too bad.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:17 PM
1

I took "anglo-saxon" to mean "white" but this isn't necessarily as accurate as maybe you were hoping I'd be in this conversation. is scandinavia anglo-saxon? see? I don't even know.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:08 PM
4

on what scale are you using to rank countries? because by any rational objective scale, scandinavia comes out on top most of the time.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:04 PM
1

yeah I was about to say he had to be at least 130. I was gonna guess 135, maybe even as high as 150. but I don't know how tall he is, so.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:29 PM
2

bruce lee weighed 105? he benched 315 for reps, what the fuck
/r/MensRights24/05/14 09:31 PM
2

whoa, hey, it's just reefer man calm down
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:54 PM
6

I agree. That doesn't make sense at all. sure, he could have been a lying scumbag and gotten the cheap thrills of random sex with people he is lying to to have sex with them, but for whatever reason he didn't want to do this. what's funny is that he doesn't want to be a lying scumbag but is perfectly ok with murdering 7 people.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:45 PM
1

the "koreans black out in public" tumblr makes me very happy. lol visit NOLA. we have a few beers, for breakfast.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 01:05 PM
3

your guys' drinking habits make this New Orleanian proud.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 12:41 PM
-1

so you're going places real quick, huh?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 12:39 PM
1

Definitely tell him. how would you feel if someone close to you knew something like this and didn't tell you?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 10:56 PM
6

i walked around in short shorts and a v neck one day. I was not sent home. EDIT: my high school was sane and didn't have a dress code. because fuck that.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:47 AM
3

it was supposed to be an "I'm sorry, that sounded pretty rough" dog. not suggesting that you should buy a dog. it... clearly didn't come off that way. sorry.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 03:42 PM
-5

dog.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 01:36 AM
2

well I'm all for the internet being a place where people treat each other with common decency, but it is the internet. I mean, if it's facebook and someone you know in real life says some personal shit about you in public, that hurts and sucks. but like, youtube comments? twitter? none of those people matter!
/r/MensRights17/04/14 11:34 PM
4

I think this was supposed to be a sex joke?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:05 PM
2

Could you go on and on?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:02 PM
1

thankfully, he is not your son, because that is not a wise, mature, or rational decision.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:15 PM
5

girl grabbed my ass out of nowhere during mardi gras this year. she was like "sorry" (which is just a cover up, she probably didn't give a shit) and I was just like "well... it already happened, so." as if the police, in New Orleans, are going to give a fuck about that, during mardi gras. blech.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:07 PM
1

Yeah I was about to say... if she asks me to do it I'll probably end up doing it. Eat food in front of her? Eat food off of her? Doesn't matter, having sex.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:16 PM
15

I don't like how this guy paints me as a bad person because I want to have anal sex with my girlfriend. I see nothing wrong with this?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:44 PM
1

but how much power did the wife really have over the man? all the books in the world can say what the authors wanted, but what really matters is how they interacted, in my opinion. I guess the problem is, we can't observe anything about back then besides the books that say all the things you said. fuck.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:23 AM
1

This is just a limit of technology, to say nothing of the limit to your epistemology. We can watch people's dreams on a tv screen. We're working on it! Also, you can ask people how they feel. Sure, they may be lying, but it's better than nothing. And unless you go full skeptic and think other people don't even have feelings, then we should be alright! I hope you think I have feelings, because I do.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:26 AM
1

are you suggesting that someone's thoughts are not part of objective reality? basically what you're saying is that you can not make any true statements about someone's thoughts. which is untrue. I know when Tom is angry, and that is a statement of fact. Similarly, I know that my mom is a racist (which sucks). These are both true facts about a reality that both you, me and my racist mother all occupy. so, if I were to say that my mom is a racist, and this was not a true reflection of the affairs …
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:15 AM
1

Some of the things I've said about the discrimination men face in the real world (like the absolute joke we call male reproductive rights, the wage gap myth, etc.) has been misinterpreted as male chauvinism. Which is kind of sad, because, well... you know. That shit ain't true.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:06 AM
1

hating women is a statement of fact. i know nothing about law but from just this, it seems to be slander. if she said: I think he's a misogynist then, fuck. can't do anything. but if she said: he is a misogynist then that is slander. that's like saying someone's in the KKK.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 04:00 AM
1

... what similarities? i'm just not seeing it. I want to see it! But I can't.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 03:38 AM
15

as an avid listener of death metal I might have to rethink my original statement.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:08 PM
1

I.... want to fucking cry.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:08 PM
22

you have one too many dooms. source: professional doom manager for the eastern seaboard.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:57 PM
6

I was just saying it for effect. being a hunter would suck balls. gatherer would also suck but at least I'm not pitting myself against monstrous wild animals.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:42 PM
6

I would much rather be a gatherer than a hunter.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:23 PM
2

Thank them for even thinking of doing this. for real. open up and close with thanking them for their time. this is huge.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:16 PM
-1

oh, indeed. that just makes it worse, in certain circumstances.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:16 PM
-3

you kidding? those little bastards can do squats all day with no problem. i have spine issues and fucked joints and really long leveraging limbs that can be easily broken or pried. try wrestling a short guy. it sucks.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:10 PM
2

that's.... fucking rough!
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:03 PM
2

i believe agent K from the first MIB put it well: A singe person is a rational, thinking entity. People are a mindless herd of crazed animals.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:40 PM
0

I agree with her overall points, some of them at least, I didn't read the whole work, but like... yeah. she is very critical, certainly. my only concern is that, in making these generalizations, she's painting with too wide a brush. and she only mentions the women whom her criticisms aren't leveled at in passing. The number of women who would reach for the latter [a life of intellectual pursuit] is too few. instead of what you even just said not all women are stupid, thoughtless creatures I don'…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:58 PM
-8

this is some of the most vitriolic "women are stupid" writings I've ever read. do we take this seriously? I mean, she consistently refers to women as stupid, thoughtless creatures.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:34 PM
3

the greeks preferred hairless bodies. it's been around for a while lol.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:20 PM
0

aw, I was rooting for you up until this point.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 03:53 PM
1

this is a pretty good line.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 03:51 PM
1

that certainly makes sense. can't miss what you never knew you had, right?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:19 PM
1

well, there we go. nevermind what I said.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 02:08 PM
2

I think it might be because we fucked up their genitals? Like, if we mutilated your dick, how many times are you going to have sex?
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:18 AM
1

Does nobody know about the "put your balls in your lap" maneuver? Try this out for a second: Sit down at a chair. Quickly thrust your hips upwards and pull your pelvis back down to send your balls moving upwards. Quickly close your legs as your balls swing free of their confines. There, now your balls are in your lap, and you have the freedom to do whatever you want to do with your legs. I discovered this when I was 5. PROS: No sitting position is uncomfortable with your balls in your lap. CONS:…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:37 PM
4

so, like... I dunno man. Ask them if they mind not touching you, or staying inside their space? don't be weirded out by coming into physical contact with another human being?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:27 PM
1

I say it does. Until I have access to my own programming to rewrite it at will, I am a slave. EDIT: Fuck it, let's try to escape this entire deterministic system.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:26 PM
1

no, I'm saying that we're biological, and that sucks.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:43 PM
15

I can't even believe this is a thing. Sit with your legs however the fuck you want? I mean, if you're wearing a skirt you obviously can't do that. So wear pants? Pants are fashionable, right? Fuck, girls look hot as shit in a good pair of denim jeans. This shouldn't be so hard to figure out.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:34 PM
1

"being forced to do things you don't want to do or else you will suffer negative consequences" sounds a bit like slavery, to me. I'd go so far as to say that humanity has been enslaved by its own condition since the get-go. there might come a day when we are truly free of this. which is why technology is looking really enticing nowadays.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:31 PM
2

"wage slave" refers to the people who are so poor that they cannot quit their jobs, and must endlessly toil the rest of their days with no chance at social maneuverability. EDIT: I think.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:20 PM
5

isn't the term "wage slave"? it's like the "choice" between worshiping God or going to Hell. doesn't really look like I have a choice.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:54 PM
2

... well it's either work for a living or.... don't have a living. and die.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:30 PM
1

any more outliers want to show up?
/r/MensRights16/09/13 02:16 PM
-2

"just as normal as anyone else". I understand this. society doesn't. society has deemed bronies to be effeminate nerds. just like, on any given day, 95/100 people wouldn't want to go to a sausage fest. the few that would would be gay. or whores.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 01:02 AM
-8

that's like saying a brony convention isn't looked down upon normally because bronies want to hang out there.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:14 PM
-10

"Too many dicks on the dance floor".. that song is about how there's too many dicks on the dance floor. Like, the dick:vagina ratio is not at a good level. There's too many men, and not enough women. I'd love to hear the song "Too many pussies on the dance floor". That song would be about how this one guy is so awesome he has too many pussies on his dance floor. there's a reason why "sausage fest" is considered negative. room full of guys? who wants to hang out in there?
/r/MensRights15/09/13 09:42 PM
1

I beat the game, got stomped on the second playthrough. Me and my two friends put 175 hours into a character and we didn't even beat the game.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:06 PM
2

hmm, so you're a retard, huh?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:49 PM
1

Fuck that fucking cocksucking Capra demon! aahhh! Sorry. You just reminded me of a whole era of bloodlust.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:42 PM
2

thanks buddy!
/r/MensRights11/09/13 02:18 PM
-3

your writing is excessive, annoying to read and you sound like a cunt. so look at that. how is it apparent that he isn't an egalitarian? really? from one obviously sarcastic post? you must have specialized in Divination.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:29 PM
4

I honestly think the most appropriate response is to just say "this is fucking retarded"
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:20 PM
13

source?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:19 PM
24

That's fucked.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:17 PM
1

well.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 01:16 AM
35

this was actually very beautiful.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 09:34 PM
2

whoa, whoa, nobody's saying you're worthless.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 02:11 PM
9

the easiest way to tackle feminism is to point out that society, as a whole, doesn't give a fuck about men. men are tools to be used and mutilated by the needs of the many. and like... this goes down to the very basics of human interactions. who wants to go to a party when it's a bunch of dudes? who gives a fuck about that? unless it's specifically about a subject and it turns out only men showed up.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:38 AM
2

woke up this morning? time for a boner. looked out the window on the schoolbus? time for a boner. was conscious for any period of time? you guessed it. time for a boner.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:18 AM
2

and an upvote for you.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:16 AM
2

why is it that the only time you ever see the words Trigger Warning are when we're about to talk about rape? you never see "Trigger Warning: The following program contains graphic images of wartime violence that may be disturbing or problematic to some viewers". It's this type of shit, the social infrastructure saying that it's ok for you to be hung up on your rape for the rest of your life, to the point where you can't even approach the subject academically, that is a huge problem. how am I sup…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:14 AM
5

thats one month longer than it takes for a baby to form in the uterus.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:09 AM
48

... This is actually pretty nice.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 01:01 AM
2

you know, like the devil.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 03:14 PM
1

physics: there's a lot more momentum and energy in running, team sports like football, soccer, and hockey than there are in fighting. energy does bad things to the human body. like, break it, and whatnot.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:55 PM
0

for us. please.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:41 PM
1

cream frische.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:36 PM
2

9/11 was on 4chan.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:49 PM
1

You haven't written anything that could be considered an argument by the loosest of definitions. I don't understand why you continue to antagonize. Do you think that, if you continue to say mean things about me (without merit or academic weight whatsoever) you will somehow arrive on top of this situation? Are you just angry with me? Because I called you out on being childish? And how did you respond to that? By.... waving your cock around and screaming at me. Nice job, bro.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:15 AM
1

So you're just going to continue to say things about my mom, as if that offends me in any way. How dreadfully inefficient. We're both native denizens of the internet. We both know that anything we say about each other will have little to not effect on the other. That's why I this little pissing match is happening. But, unfortunately for you, I'm rounding you off at the pass every time. I already predicted your ape response and you're probably going to continue to say mean things about the woman …
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:42 AM
1

.... I was an engineer. D:
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:36 AM
1

My mom is a doctor, lol. I'm sorry, a nurse practitioner. I mean, do you expect me to defend myself against you, or something? You did exactly what I expected you to do. I prodded you by jabbing your intelligence and you reacted defensively, puffing your chest and beating on the keyboard like an ape would beat on its chest. This is the "ritual combat" I alluded to before. Your desperate scramble to save face and social position in a public sphere, by denouncing me and my supposed intelligence an…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:36 PM
1

no, just more than a few brain cells to spark a thought from. EDIT: what I'm implying here is that you do not have more than a few brain cells from which to form thought. making that an insult against your perceived intelligence. you may now initiate combat to redeem yourself in front of your peers, if you like.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:51 PM
1

Since you haven't done "x", you cannot criticize system "y" for doing "x" badly. That's what you did. That's childish.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:37 PM
1

this is incredibly childish behavior, going so far as to almost perfectly mirror what Yahweh said to Job in the Bible. and as we all know, Yahweh was an insufferable cunt.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:06 PM
2

every engineering student in my university (albeit, a small, shitty one in Louisiana) was the shell of a broken man by his 3rd year. can't say the same for the sciences, but, that was a real thing.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:03 PM
1

you deserve some karma for this.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:59 PM
1

This reminds me of Sirens of Titan. I am a victim of a series of accidents; as are we all.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:47 PM
1

I like how you use "dark" and "pale". I might borrow this.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:38 PM
-1

I don't necessarily think you should have gotten downvoted on this.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:36 PM
3

where did you link that from? the r/japan thread about the article?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:27 PM
1

I want to crawl into a hole and die. EDIT: now that I've read this, I should say. out of context I just sound depressed, lol.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:22 PM
4

this is too many words, guys. stop being so smart.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:07 PM
-1

and god, dancing is the most absurd shit.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:02 PM
1

sorry to hear that. I only heard it worked in a documentary. I hope you find some respite though, and good luck my scandinavian friend.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 11:50 AM
1

nobody commented on this? geeze. this is pretty fucked.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:58 PM
0

oh, ok, my mistake. don't think it's great to call all women sluts, though. try the term mammal.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:47 PM
2

LSD cures those if you didn't know. problem; LSD is illegal as shit.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:45 PM
1

being shot in the knee is up there. breaking your femur in half. or, as another redditor explained, custer headaches. all of these are worse than childbirth. to top it off, your body prepares you for childbirth, with a cocktail of happy hormones. no such thing exists for gunshot wounds.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:45 PM
-1

so, hold on... you knowingly fucked girls with husbands and boyfriends? if yes, what the fuck, bro?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 12:43 PM
14

yeah we invented the spear because tigers were way bigger than we were. weapons trump size.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 12:20 PM
-18

well, ~150,000 years of being told they can't do anything right, so men have to do it, has the unfortunate repercussion of women never learning how to do things so that men will have to come along and do it. and we wonder why they act like this. like it's a huge mystery.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 11:33 PM
1

damn, Massachusetts. my dad divorced my mom in that state and actually got custody of me, which is weird I hear.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 12:52 PM
2

I don't think you know what the fuck you're talking about, man.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 05:30 PM
1

One of the few things that will always stick with my from a history teacher my freshman year of high school: If you see people burning books, turn around and run away. As fast as you can.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:56 PM
4

son of a bitch.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:53 PM
1

I get it now, thanks! that is pretty good, lol.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:28 AM
1

yeah I get argument, I just didn't understand how exactly this was flipping their logic to make it absurd. someone explained and now I do.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:27 AM
2

... can you explain to me why this is gold? I'm a little slow this morning. :/
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:48 PM
1

"people lie" would be better I think.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:47 PM
2

She's the type of person you shouldn't be friends with. make a picture that looks similar to hers that says "How to make decisions in government". Start Do you have a dick? No? Get back to the kitchen! Ask her if that's sexist.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:45 PM
1

we hunted through persistence hunting which helped us learn how to plan ahead and reason. we hunted through persistence because of our physiology. I think this is why we got out of the jungle and other animals haven't.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:06 PM
2

very good point.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:11 PM
2

I might need to hit up r/askhistorians. Thanks for showing me that I am ignorant. You are curing me.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:17 AM
1

reason is the ... reason... we don't live in the jungle, anymore. chimpanzees operate with emotions.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:14 AM
1

I don't know because I'm not a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:12 AM
10

mostly because marriage laws that treated women like property. although, slavery was a thing, women were almost always of a lower class to men. couldnt vote for a while, either. or is my entire knowledge of history wrong.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:39 PM
3

.. source? not to disbelieve you, I just want to know where you got this so I can read it.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:32 PM
6

I'm sorry, but how is that not inferior? this sounds like you're talking about training a dog. Especially that last bold sentence. Whenever I feel things for no reason I view it as negative. Why did I feel those things if I had absolutely no reason to? Did I let it effect my decision making? So I made a decision for what amounts to no reason. I've noticed that almost every time I've done this it's been a mistake.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:27 PM
1

from Bukkake_Monster. Nice.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:00 PM
2

well, that's fucked.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:19 PM
6

i mean, sure, people shouldn't stare at someone and eyefuck them if the other person is uncomfortable with it. but this just looks like it's bound to get abused.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:50 AM
1

Oh, I see.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:44 PM
1

Loool
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:44 PM
0

and yet you're saying women have the right to force parenthood onto a man. I'm sorry, but your rights end where my life begins. If I do not want to be a part of this parental unit, then I should be able to not be part of this parental unit. Women have that choice. You can abandon your child to adoption. Men have no such choice.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:26 PM
0

what's fun here is that a woman can be irresponsible as fuck and get away with it, and a man can be as responsible as he can (outside of changing his biological structure via vasectomy) and still get fucked. why are we living in a world where women don't have to be responsible but men do? why is it all on me, the man? aren't women, you know, equally capable or something? "life ain't fair, deal with it" NO. Imagine if we thought that forever. Oh, it's not fair, that's just how it is. Never try to…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:23 PM
0

not his body it's not her body, either. the body in question being the baby. just so happens its taken up residency within her womb. are we carving her womb out? no. it's more like we're removing a parasite from the host. it just so happens that after 9 months the body naturally removes the parasite and it just so happens to be able to live outside the host. yes, I did just call a baby a parasite. in what way is it not.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:09 PM
1

there is no fair way easiest way to make sure we never find one is to suggest that it's impossible to find. sociology pitfall 101, never say never. damn sure how she feels again, deceit might change their minds and deceit. why is it simple for a woman (who is a person, and people are good at lying) to destroy my whole life? MY LIFE. She can choose to destroy hers with her child, and she can choose to destroy mine as well. I am not going to "just get over" this fact. "just get over it" is a reall…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:07 PM
1

it might be my own opinion and I don't necessarily care if other people back me up on it. I don't think women should be able to wield their uterus as a weapon against a man. How do we stop this from happening? What legal procedures can we take to mitigate the dominance that women have over men when it comes to this? in a complete tangent, we should mitigate the dominance any group of people has over any other group of people, but that's really hard and sounds very complicated.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:53 PM
1

really think the world is full no, but the law makes it far too easy for any woman to do it. people are crazy and we shouldn't give them legal options to ruin other people's lives. communicate and build trust over what? "I don't want kids and if you get pregnant I won't support it" vs. "I want kids and if I get pregnant you'd better support it". How does one build trust over this gap? "Oh, don't worry. If I get pregnant I'll at least consider your feelings/wants". this would turn into a non-issu…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:51 PM
2

alright so I yield that position. however, financial opting-out should be available.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:47 PM
0

... I'm sorry, but what exactly does rape have to do with male reproductive rights? I'm not being thick on purpose, and to make fun of me for being "too stupid to debate" is a very healthy cop-out. care to try again? this time, with a spine? Don't knock up any women. Well sometimes reality has a way of fucking you over. For instance, birth control failing, the IUD failing, condoms failing. What do I do if I protected myself and the girl still gets pregnant? I'm FUCKED at this point. Nothing I ca…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:19 PM
2

as it rightfully should have.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:10 PM
0

something called rape which literally has nothing to do with this conversation whatsoever. nice try, though. besides keeping my semen as far away from any fertile uterus as possible, what other options do I have? oh, right. to be completely 100% safe as a man, I have to choose not to have sex. because condoms can break, birth control can fail, etc. other than abstinence, what other choices do I really have? use a condom and hope for the best? I don't like operating on hope. this is why I gave up…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:09 PM
1

It's not our fault that shit works.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:55 PM
1

I don't have a padlock on my fucking condoms, man. to have a padlock on my condoms means I don't trust any of the women I'm with enough to leave them alone with my condoms. that's not great.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:53 PM
1

the thing about deceit is that you can trust the person who lies to you. if they're good enough at lying you won't even know.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:52 PM
2

I want to wrestle a panda bear. cus it's a panda.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:50 PM
3

well, if you had any punctuation here... we might know what you're saying.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:48 PM
1

is despicable why. besides some emotional response we have, why is it despicable.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:46 PM
2

women and children first.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:43 PM
1

huh. one group says we're a hate group... for what reason exactly?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:39 PM
1

satire my friend.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:39 PM
1

if you aren't intellectually honest then the debate (which is the search for truth between two people) shoots into the ground like the Hindenburg. Imagine there are two people pointing flashlights in opposite directions in the darkness, trying to decipher their environment. Then one of them turns off his flashlight. how are you going to learn anything besides what you already know?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:36 PM
2

I don't think you got it. I said my very poor argument to mirror his very poor argument, in hopes of him realizing that arguments of that form are very poor. he didn't get it either. or willingly did not care about it.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:34 PM
0

care to explain why the male, half of the total parenting unit, cannot have an equal voice in whether or not his genetics carry on to the next generation?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:33 PM
1

... I know. I made my argument to show him how bad his argument was. Same form, different subjects. Still broken as all shit.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:32 PM
1

care to explain this?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:32 PM
1

... well then.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:31 PM
2

upvote for honesty. we've all been there.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:31 PM
1

When I was employed by a grocery store I was immediately given $1.00 an hour more than my fellow employees who'd had the job for 3+ years. I was the only white person working the floor. I felt bad.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:30 PM
1

I can give you the screencaps if you want them. Of course, it will take me some time because I'm on vacation in NYC for the first time, holla holla, but I can show you proof of this. It's all in PM's so I'll have to printscreen/imgur upload for you, but I'm not just gonna sit here and be called a liar.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:29 PM
1

as it stands now, the man basically has no say in what happens to his genetic offspring once it roots a hold inside the woman's uterus. this is counter to 100% of the say that women have once it reaches that point. men have contraception, women have contraception. but men don't have any say, or legal rights, beyond that point. I want to fix that.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:28 PM
0

financial opt out still leaves a living human that needs more money than one parent is able to provide. or so says the state, which could be completely wrong. as opposed to abortion where, you know, none of those problems. do we force her? I don't know, man. who is "we"? if there were laws saying "you can't have a child unless both of the parents agree to it" with state mandated abortions, would that be horrible? or would that just ensure that every child born has a family that loves it? another…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 06:09 PM
11

oh, i see. so they lied. interesting how they seem to do that a lot. EDIT: the economy; the ultimate bullshit detector.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 05:22 PM
-1

I don't think it should be that "men should have equal say about what women should do" but instead it should be "men should have equal say about what happens to their genetics". Men should have equal vote in whether or not the child gets aborted, or put up for adoption, etc. saying it the other way sounds too much like "men just want to control women" that the SRS idiots keep making a strawman out of. It ends up being that women have to do things because men had a say, but we didn't say it to do…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 05:21 PM
4

If anyone has paid attention, but I doubt you guys have because nobody cares about little old me, this is the same guy I argued with over in this thread yeah, I know. I didn't do the best I could have done. I was coming at the guy with an open mind, thinking that maybe the MRA's were wrong and there was something to this feminism business. So when I feigned stupidity it was me trying not to confirmation bias from the info you guys previously gave me. Now I know that perhaps that was a futile exe…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 05:13 PM
-4

let's humor them and agree that some women are paid less for equal work. I think there are statistics that support this conclusion? That not all of the wage gap is explained as you have just done so? I could be wrong on that. but, anyway, if they are paid less, they should continue to be paid less, because they have rights in other areas of life. like, reproduction.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 05:10 PM
2

blanket statements like that one only work with one scenario. no one should ever rape anyone else ever. we can even get away with murder, if it's in self defense. theft even, if you steal because you're starving to death. not rape, though.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:37 AM
1

she then informed the boy that it was "within her rights to do so". for some reason, I doubt this. I doubt this a whole hell of a lot.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:32 AM
1

sounds like that guy should wash his ass sometime.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 02:21 AM
12

all humans FTFY. srsly, we have sweat glands and ass hair. what the fuck's going on with that.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:31 PM
10

and will turn into boring, selfish men. well, that's not the biggest sweeping generalization I've ever heard, or anything. this is sexism, you cow.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:30 PM
1

Because you couldn't click them anyway? If it's going to be an image, it wouldn't matter what font or color some text is in. You can't click it. And whatever she's citing is... not really what she's looking to cite. Taking everything out of context/strawmanning everywhere. what would have happened if he hadn't edited out the links? some of the text would be bold, to show what she's emphasizing. ok. still can't click those links. still can't get any link information from it cus it's a picture. so…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:15 PM
8

anti-feminist might be a good thing? where is the sexism? where is the anti-women? show it to me. I don't see it. I'm not just covering my eyes to act like an asshole. No, I'm serious. show me that shit. if he goes to r/beatingwomen then, well... that's all for that boat. so that guy is a misogynist. maybe. again, equating that guy to most is gonna take a bit more than that.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:33 AM
7

this is weird, because I'm looking around and I don't see any. I'm also looking at myself. last time I checked I wasn't stupid enough to be sexist or racist. so...
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:31 AM
0

what are the hotlinks even going to do for you? you can't click them on a picture. maybe that's why? cus it wouldn't matter? my "bullshit" was to suggest that the Jezebel article linked you to things in defense of arguments in a nonsensical way. she would link you to something that didn't prove anything for her, and really only shows that she's great at taking things out of context. some MRA's are going to do some of those things. obviously. some priests molest children, therefore all priests mo…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:29 AM
2

I was arguing with some idiot about reproductive rights. I said that "the system in which men have zero reproductive rights isn't a good system." he said "because the system is patriarchal". this.. fucking astounded me. I respond: "so you're telling me, the men who make all the decisions, decided that it would be in their best interest, to strip away ALL REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS FROM MEN?" remember in the 1700's when men in the US could pretty much kick their wife down the stairs to abort the child s…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:21 AM
1

its the insurgents that get really fucked, though. not even protected under the geneva convention. that shit sucks.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:17 AM
1

by order of appearance: http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/12/06/never-forget/ http://manboobz.com/2012/12/08/a-voice-for-mens-attempts-to-find-and-publicize-the-personal-information-of-a-toronto-activist-could-threaten-that-young-womans-safety/ http://manboobz.com/2012/11/21/what-mens-rights-guru-warren-farrell-actually-said-about-the-allegedly-positive-aspects-of-incest-note-its-even-more-repugnant-than-that-sounds/ http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:15 AM
1

oops.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:14 AM
2

you deserve money for this.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:02 AM
8

because it's bullshit? most people here are misogynists? most men aren't misogynists. you want misogyny? go to r/beatingwomen.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:59 AM
6

no. but if you act like a dickhead, then yes.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:58 AM
10

I remember my first time stumbling here. i was like "What the fuck? There's a Mens Rights board? We already have all the rights!" boy, did I learn something that day.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:47 AM
5

robust enough to handle dissent. notice how the r/mensrights board doesn't have a totalitarian system of banishment? that we allow dissent? now notice that every single SRS or feminist subreddit has a totalitarian system of banishment and censorship specifically to block out all dissent. I wonder why any intellectually honest group would be so inclined to do such a thing. Surely, if their position is logical, they should be able to withstand the slight breeze of criticism or doubt? Nope, just li…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:37 AM
1

so.. you think it's good that men can't sit next to children on airplanes because men are all sex predators? if you don't think that's good, then congrats! you're MRM.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:31 AM
1

I was just reading this... and it's all retarded.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:24 AM
1

Well, imagine if the man was begging to go down on the girl until she reluctantly agrees to let him eat her out for 30 seconds. Now switch the genders and that's what happened to me. She begged me to let her suck me off in a bar bathroom. After begging me to fuck her in the bathroom, to which I declined cus it's a 1) public and 2) bathroom. I did, at every point, have the option of walking out. But then I'd have a bitchy girl on my hands the whole night. Actually, I think she did get mad at me w…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:01 AM
1

they pretend to be so there does not exist the thing we're talking about. why not?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:34 PM
0

i c wut u did thar. EDIT: can't help but agree with you. kinda. what would happen if there was a catch all "human equality" movement?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:06 PM
6

looks a bit like religion to me.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:37 PM
1

I'm currently fixing that.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:35 PM
2

it was kind of funny/absurd at the time cus she was so out-of-character aggressive. but looking back on it... damn.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:29 PM
13

I posted this once but it was overlooked, probably because the thread had died... anyway. You know how, as a man, it's been drilled into your head that "No" is the big red flag word? If you're getting physical with a girl and she says "no", that's time for you to stop? cus, you know. Rape. anyway, I'm drinking with my girl at a bar and I kid you not, there was nothing, not a fucking word I could say to this girl that would stop her from coming on to me. She begged and pleaded with me until I eve…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:10 AM
1

she didn't press charges because her hyper religious parents. There's a whole cloud of unknown around the whole situation. It's not great to think about.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:43 PM
6

well, now I'm pissed off.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:57 PM
1

look mom, no hands. what? how... honestly I would be surprised if a man with no arms raped a woman. I know she said "wouldn't lay a hand on her" but, for the sake of this joke, imagine a no armed man trying to rape someone.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:52 PM
5

you're gonna be alright, man. I guess you should PM me your paypal address or something. EDIT: the only way humans learn is through mistakes. and not someone else's mistakes. because clearly you're smarter than everyone else, right? that won't happen to you. you'll be careful. then you're laying in bed staring at the ceiling with your mind closing in on itself with vehement haste and you realize that you're a combination of short-sighted and ill-prepared.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:53 AM
9

My girlfriend was raped while cheating on me. I was too jealous and spiteful and angry to care about her needs and instead blamed the victim and yelled at her. She tried to commit suicide some time later and I also didn't show up to help her. In between those two things I broke up with her. Not saying correlation is causation, but, you know. The problems you're going through, abandonement, feeling alone... that's what I was putting her through. She's doing fine now, but I'm afraid that I'll neve…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:19 AM
5

do you have a preference? take your pick, please. I'm an ok person. There are many people better than I. like, you, for example.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:55 AM
9

if you find an item you care to own, a book, movie, videogame, that costs less than $20, send me a message. I'll buy it for you. merry christmas.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:01 AM
7

is there anything I can do for you, man? I'll paypal you $15 for some beer or something, shit. you fucking need it.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:52 PM
0

I want to fight those people? what is this...
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:12 PM
1

well, that's not good.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 01:01 PM
1

i just had a thought. I hope you don't mind if I share it. Earlier, when tripping on acid and thinking about the history of our species, I became very... sad for women. All that rape. The misogyny, basically breeding women to be manipulative cunts so it's kind of our fault... how much of that is real? almost all of our works in history that come from the ancients (greeks, persians, egyptians, babylonians) are things written by men, for men. how much of that language is just guy talk? just one du…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:51 PM
1

that's kind of what I've seen, too. I look at the "sums it up" posts which illustrate how the law is discriminated against men, and I want to see discussions about those things... and what I end up seeing are people just... saying fucked up shit about women.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:25 PM
1

this guy is getting downvoted? what in the fuck... we should promote nonviolence. not saying it's ok to hit women. it's not really ok for anyone to hit anyone, honestly. what are you, a bunch of fucking chimpanzees?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:46 AM
7

all humans have attention seeking tendencies.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:29 AM
0

of course, with a username like ex_nihilo... that's pretty awesome, man.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:26 AM
3

... I'm sorry, but is anyone going to mention how you just got hundreds of other dudes to look at a picture of your boner? well played sir.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:10 AM
1

Come to think of it, my ex-girlfriend got exceedingly drunk one time at a bar and basically forced me to let her suck me off in the bathroom. For 10 seconds. She argued me down from fucking, to sucking me off to completion, to five minutes, to one minute, to 30s, and then finally 10s. I could not deter her from this. It was absurd. I just... don't want to fuck you in a bathroom. If I'm gonna fuck you, I need something a little more stable than a slippery tile floor and a porcelain throne. And it…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:04 AM
6

I can put my dick in a flower....
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:51 AM
0

This logic is questionable at best.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:51 AM
2

I asked the girl sitting next to me. She agreed. you're retarded. for reference the girl is a very feminist/liberal NYU student so I feel like she's a pretty good source. also, I don't even need to ask a woman. Being raped is bad. Yeah. But being held down by a group of men and having your vagina sliced with knives, permanently ruining your genitals... like come on. That's like some fucking Saw shit. Raped with a razor. Imagine that. Let me rub your clit off with a fucking saw blade. I bet that'…
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:46 PM
3

are you fucking retarded? female genital mutilation is basically rape with a razor. The fuck? I'm fucking high and I can figure that shit out. You think it's one guy doing it? Genital mutilation require multiple people all in on the act. Gang rape with a fucking razor. I hope you don't have any children because your genes do not need to replicate you fucking moron.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:04 PM
3

you pretty much just got schooled, asshole. recognize that you're wrong and grow up. you'll be a better person because of it.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter