TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CertusAT Archive

View 1 post and 486 comments by CertusAT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

CertusAT/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Sucks when your gf gets off the pill without telling you.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 12:42 PM
2

More like you are too fucking stupid to intrprate the comic for what it. The message is so brutally on the nose, it needing an explanation is more the fault of the people not understanding it.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 10:19 AM
54

Came here to basically say this, you can see she takes an honest approach to the whole thing and simple has a different POV. I'm kinda annoyed with how aggressive he is, considering that she is very friendly. With a feminist like her you can have a real honest conversation and exchange ideas and information. Unfortunately she is a tiny minority and no sub on reddit is run by a person like that, they are all crazy SJW feminists, who are ban happy.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:50 PM
3

That is horrible, she is a fucking cunt.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:18 AM
13

YES! I absolutely agree with that. If you aren't in school already I wouldn't chell out any money for courses until you have a firm grasp of what's going on with the help of books and online tutorials and the like. Learning programming is easier than ever, if you ahve the stamina to do it.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:16 PM
15

Jesus you are annoying, what exchange looks better to you? Her: "Most abusers are fathers." Him: "Oh you should know, most abusers are mothers." Her: "No." or this. Her: "Most abusers are fathers." Him: "Oh you should know, most abusers are mothers." Her: "No." Him: "This statistic and this study and this survey say otherwise, how do you explain that away?" It's pretty clear which one looks better, I just expect more of him because he isn't a feminist,he knows that it's going to be a uphill batt…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:50 PM
22

I expect his reasonable statements to be backed up by actual evidence.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:36 PM
21

I woudl be more supportive of this dude if he had anything but hot air, like please, can you just dumpster this woman with some statistics? Some citations? Some actual hard facts. Don't get me wrong, they are both guilty of this, but I'd expect more from him.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:22 PM
0

Dude, if he's in to being cocked, that's his fetish, I don't really give a shit. I also don't give a shit about his justifications for getting cocked. I don't know why people pay so much attention to some guy.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:25 AM
17

Pathetic. That's really the only word I have for this dude. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 04:46 PM
4

"there is no documented case in which a male failed to get the right amount of edges" I was reading along until this sentence, which made it clear that either parts of this story, or the whole story, are made up. I'm certain a lot of working man in this sub have had the pleasure of working with an incompetent co-worker. There is no way that not a single guy counted wrong. And if he lied about that part, what else did he lie about? Probably most of it, if not all of it.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:02 PM
1

If personal space is so hyper important, does the guy to her right have the right to fuck her up because she is pushing against him? You are pathetic.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 02:51 AM
3

Where the fuck is he even shoving, they both want that spot at the bar, but she is the one escalating the "pushing" to physical violence. Also what the fuck is this "He was not legally entitled to touch her.", that's such a fucking strange sentence. If I'm in a crammed subway I ain't gonna start hitting people because "They have no legally entitled right to touch me" while they push past me towards the doors. Jesus, get real.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:46 PM
4

but grabbing her wrist and not letting go instead of backing off was intentional. Obviously, he wanted to avoid her hitting him in the face, but holding on to her raised fist didn't stop her, she just used her other hand. I'm baffled at how many people thinking raising a fist is okay, holding on to it is not, hitting somebody in the face is okay, hitting back is not.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:19 PM
2

There is no point in having a conversation with you unless you accept that hitting him in the face was unacceptable. She escalated the situation from mild physical contact & verbal aggression to outright assault. I'd be willing to have a conversation about the shoving and stuff, maybe you can point something out that I haven't seen, but I can't take you for full if you think the kind of contact they had justifies her hitting him in the face with her fist.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:20 PM
8

She hit him first, in the face, it's her fault. Period. That said, I rechecked the video and I have to conclude that you forgot to wear your glasses. They both head to the bar at the same time, he is to the left of her, but doesn't ahve as much space available. He secures his spot by holding on to the bar with his right hand and I do NOT see excessive shoving of either party. What I see is that she wants that spot for herself, but he doesn't let her. I see some pushing on her part, but he can't …
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:21 PM
7

She raised her hand in a fist, ready to strike, he tried to stop that. As we can see, she simply used her other hand and it completely justified his instinct to grab her hand.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 12:55 PM
7

On what level does it work as satire, what's the message? All the examples in the comic are legit.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:25 PM
20

First of all, all the examples in this comic are clearly wrong...and so is rape. I don't know if they are that fucking retarded (it's the only way to say this) and really believe that men in general think rape is okay. This whole comic only makes sense if people would generally think rape is okay, but these things aren't okay.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 11:34 AM
4

Top kek at this quote: Zara’s death serves only one purpose - it reminds us of the mosasaurus, which we already saw in action. It also kills off a named character in the big attack which serves to increase the severity of said attack. It’s a moment where the movie nudges us in the ribs and says, ‘Hey, remember this dinosaur? Don’t forget him!’ True. in an insipid attempt to set up the bad finale where this dino mystifyingly saves the day (remember how the dinosaurs were animals in the first film…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 09:02 AM
1

Hey, I rarely write on this sub-reddit because (I think) it's mostly for single man that focus on improving themselves and fucking many hot women. That's just not the position I'm in right now, but I think I can add something to this thread. I've had many short relationships before, basically I was constantly dating one girl or another (or 2 girls) 3~ month at a time and I think I know why I stuck with her and why it's working great. It's cause we are best friends, that fuck. "Love" as you see i…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 01:50 PM
1

Wow, I'm impressed with the level of advice and maturity in this thread, really great.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 01:17 PM
1

Question: Isn't ADHD medication actually useful even for people who don't suffer from it? Giving your more drive and focus to finish your work? Maybe I'm simply misinformed, but I could use some ADHD medication to finish some of my learning projects if that's actually the case and maybe some of those parents are thinking the same, getting the medication and using it specifically for those instances.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:00 PM
1

Looks fine to me.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 03:19 PM
4

Don't get married, ever. Only have a kid with a woman you would trust your life with. (literally) Gotta play hardball until the laws change.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:19 AM
23

How's that not a moral issue...?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:40 AM
2

First of all, using a 4 year old is laughably, the 4 year old is a tiny child, a grown woman as an adult. So unless you are equating the two I see no point in that analogy. Secondly, I made the EXACT point in my post that strength, does not matter. I have the right to defend myself from harm no matter how strong or weak the attacker is. Using what ever force is necessary to defend myself is justified by the law. Using excessive force is not, but I'm certainly not advertising excessive force as a…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:43 PM
3

Okay, for example. You get slapped on the street by a random stranger. You see him preparing for another slap, you hit him in the face. He falls over, hits his head on the ground and is comatosed from the impact, how would you judge that? We are not talking about person A getting pinched and in retaliation punching person B face in to mush, but accidents happen and the result of a simple self defense is not as important as the actions one took while defending.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:38 PM
174

Man A screams at man B. Man B strikes at man A. Man A defends himself, hitting back. The police arrives, questions the men and the observers. The Law judges man B harshly because he attacked man A first, who in turn defended himself. This is simple, clear and well understood by almost everyone. I have never seen a man who doesn't understand this, if you start the violence you are to blame for the violence. NOBODY cares if man A is much stronger than man B, that doesn't even enter the conversatio…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 11:17 AM
11

Neutral observers, note the difference in up and down votes on this thread, low quality is on the bottom, high quality at the top. Showing what the overwhelming majority this community actually leans towards. I feel like this should be self evident, but considering how much reddit as a whole seems to hate on MR it should be pointed out more often.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:40 PM
2

Why does this matter? So she tried to off herself, why does that even factor in? If she is sane, she is a murderer. If she is insane she needs treatment and the population needs to be protected from her. For the child it would have better if she succeeded, killed herself, and left him alone. Mentally scarred perhaps, but at least alive.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 09:12 PM
2

You are fucking retarded. You kill your own innocent child? You are fucking scum, period. You should be locked up for punishment / revenge / justice / to protect society, choose which ever fits your moral alignment. You kill your own innocent child because you are insane? You are a danger to society and should be locked up until treatment is guaranteed to have been successful.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 09:09 PM
1

Well, I have to bow my head to this well reasoned argument.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:19 PM
0

Really? I did not realize that if you have a 0.1% chance that any given stone has the color red, that your chance of finding a red stone amongst 100 stones is equal to the chance of finding a red stone amongst 1 000 000 stones. Please, go and educate the world on how probability/statistics/chance works, I think a nobel prize is waiting for you.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:34 AM
1

It is the absolute perfect analogy, I can not think of a single flaw and either your comments are completely retarded OR you can't think of one either because you haven't posted one yet.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:36 AM
1

Yes, I read your asinine comment. My analogy was of course that the small towns are populated by women and the huge towns are populated by men. A lot more men play these games than women. If you divide the whole player base by gender you get a small pool of women and a huge pool of men. That was the whole point of my analogy.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:26 AM
1

So the exact equal amount of men and women play LoL/Starcraft? Do you even use your brain?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:15 AM
1

I made it perfectly clear why I said that it feels like as if I was arguing against a feminist. Because he was changing the definition of words. How that eluded you is beyond my understanding.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:54 AM
1

No. The size of the pool has no causative relation with the skill level of those players. Well that is just completely inaccurate. The bigger the player pool the higher the chance a player with the potential to be a top 0.1% player is in it. Think about it this way. You have a competition in which citys field teams to fight one another. You got a small village with about 200 people, some medium size cities with 1000 to 5000 people and than you have a metropolis with about a million people living…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:53 AM
1

The size of the female player base has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not women can or "can't compete. Smaller player pool, smaller potential for good players. If the player pool is larger chances are better that certain conditions are met witch contribute heavily whether a person can compete on the highest level of play or not. Statistics. I'm not saying that women can't compete, just that they aren't right now and that one contributing factor alongside several others is the tiny play…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:39 AM
1

That isn't how sexism is defined in feminist theory. That isn't relevant to what I said.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:17 AM
-1

No, sexism is discrimination based on sex. Stop redefining words to fit your narrative, I feel like I'm arguing against feminists right now. Motivation and context are important, you can't judge something in a vacuum and expect a accurate representation of reality. Female only tournaments don't exist because they hate/dislike or think men are inferior. They happen because men drown out all the women in regular competitions. No malice is included in to the whole though process behind creating tho…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 11:29 PM
-9

You're saying the girls aren't good enough to compete with the big boys, that they need their own special area to play. That's the sexism. First, let me say that the way you phrase things is ridiculous and that you need to take your emotional anger down a few pegs. It's impossible to have a factual argument with you, you bring emotional arguments in to it at every possible moment. Secondly, no that's not sexism. It's realism. Right now the top players are male. Right now there isn't a female pla…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:54 PM
-9

That is a really childish view on sexism. It's not sexist to have a boy only club, is it? Neither is it sexist to have a women only tournament. The exclusion of male players isn't happening because they don't like men, but because they want to play against women only. They want to know who is the best woman. It's good for the market, for the organizations and for the sport itself.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 08:25 PM
8

Simple explanation: Even thou female players should be able to compete with male players on the same level in e-sport, right now they can't. There may be extremely good female players out there, better than 99% of the players base, problem is that the top 0,01% who are actually good enough to compete are almost all males. Female only tournaments enable women to compete against one another, to win titles, small prizes and get some exposure. A male only tournament would serve no such purpose. So w…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:59 PM
1

That's one sexy argument flip.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:28 AM
5

It's one thing to touch something dry, and one thing to touch something wet. Before I put my finder in my gf vajj you bet your dirty little hands I wash them. I want that place to stay open for business and not get infections all over. It's also nice, respectful, hygienic and should be self evident.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 09:58 AM
2

Does your dick touch everything your hands touch? Dick should be clean, unlike hands it doesn't come in to contact with hand rails and tables and a shit ton of other potentially dirty stuff.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 08:58 AM
9

That's actually slut-shaming in there eyes. Any decision that you make about them which is negative FOR them is slut-shaming if you base it on the fact that they fuck around a lot. I have come to terms with being a "slut shamer" under this definition and all I can say is, "So what?".
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:19 PM
3

Yup, I agree. Also it shouldn't matter what the potential harm is. The act itself should be judged.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 02:15 PM
3

Whups, my comment was supposed to go in to this thread http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25tsfq/solange_and_jayz_its_simply_not_the_same_if_a_man/
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:23 PM
1

EQUALITY!* *Only when it helps women.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:22 PM
5

EQUALITY!* *Only when it helps women. €: This comment was supposed to go on to the Solange and Jay-Z thread.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 10:25 AM
22

Looking for real rape culture? Look no further than prison.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 03:08 PM
5

Tell him you don't like it, tell him the smell annoys you and makes you dislike kissing. The secret in getting men to do what you want is telling him the consequences of his actions without dictating what he should do about it. Men like solving problems, so present him with a problem and he will work out the solution. Men want to please their women, he WANTS to make you happy. If the desire to make you happy and getting kisses without you making a face is bigger than his desire to smoke he will …
/r/RedPillWomen02/05/14 09:35 AM
3

baseless judgment. How is that baseless? You basically told me that I wasn't gonna get a paternity test because I want to validate my trust, but because I DON'T trust. It's not baseless, I react to what I see.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:07 PM
6

and most dudes would even be afraid to ask Yes, because of the bullshit that you and people like you spread. It shouldn't be a problem to ask for a paternity test, it should not damage the relationship if done for the right reasons, suggesting like you did what my motives MUST be and what it WILL do to my relationship is one of the reasons why it's such a horrid topic for men.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:00 PM
8

You're still defaulting to the child not being yours. No. I'm defaulting that the child is mine and I would like to have my believe validated. By asking the question despite having no reason to suspect anything makes you look paranoid and will not be good for your relationship. I would never willingly have a child with a woman who thinks I'm paranoid or that the relationship will be damaged if I want a paternity test. It is simple, your wife will think you don't trust her and she is right. If I …
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:46 PM
3

More like "The child is mine, but I would like to have definitive proof." I will ask for a paternity test if I have kids for sure. I won't be expecting it to come back negative, or that my gf cheated on me. I will expect the paternity test to show that I'm the father.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:20 PM
2

brb grandpas old stuff
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:13 PM
12

Dude, I can not understand how that escalated. You complained, she said she didn't want that, you say okay, it is noted. You either tell her your inability to not complain, and don't com around until such problems will not be occurring anymore (construction is finished). Or you simply comply with her request because it's her place and she gets to make the rules. I had gf in the past that where completely unable to have a constructive disagreement, but escalating this situation is totally on you.…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:04 PM
12

I think it matters little what you want when it comes to having a child. A child is not a pet, it's a human that you have the job to care for and protect until he can do it himself. For me it really boils down to 3 simple questions. Do you both want one now? Do you have the financial stability to support one? Do you have the mental stability to support one? If you can give 3 times yes as the answer, get going. What other people think is of little to no concern, it won't be them doing all the wor…
/r/RedPillWomen04/04/14 10:33 AM
5

Hahaha, KSI that bad boy getting in to trouble for consented public motor boating. Jesus these "feminists" (the word means nothing anymore) are pathetic.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:22 PM
16

What a lunatic.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:11 PM
1

I hope he will get his child back!
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:06 AM
5

Holy shit. I'm astound that the report was pro men. Very awesome. I just watched her talk and it was pretty good, some of the logic isn't 100% sound but it's pretty good.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 12:50 PM
9

That makes no sense. They don't live where you live, they live in china and in china it's a lot.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:35 PM
1

Without knowing what they where actually gonna teach we can't possibly judge if it's a good or bad idea. Certainly I would have called the schooling asking what was going on.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 12:56 PM
2

You probably get flak on reddit because it goes against the "women can do it all" narrative. They are so insecure in there life choices that a fellow female choosing to stay home and not peruse a career threatens like them challenges there choices. Why would you stay at home if going for a career is the better choice? Do what you want to do, if you are upfront it's completely okay
/r/RedPillWomen28/01/14 09:37 PM
1

That is so petty shit.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 07:31 AM
1

Cause I have to be a woman for disagreeing with you right? Dude, get a clue.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 07:16 AM
7

People here claim "honor" is a male abstraction, seems to have passed by you without affect.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 10:20 PM
0

You think I don't get it, but you focus way too much on the word "nice". 90% of what I said was focused around a good work environment, which you seem to completely agree with. We differ in what we understand as a good working environment. But I think you could agree that being nice and respectful is the safe route to take. It's easier to be nice than to suddenly enjoy jokeinsults. And since being nice is the safe and easy way to go it's pretty effective as a default mode. The fact of the matter…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 07:26 PM
0

I disagree, therefore you are wrong (and you are, I'm not just being an ass). Huh? Of all the things I said I would not have guessed that a good work environment would be called in to question. I thought it was universally agreed upon that having colleges which one doesn't dislike /despises / hates is a general plus on productivity. Humans are social animals and "just focusing on work" isn't going to work (most of the time). Would you go to a college for help if every time you asked him he calls…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:41 PM
-1

I'll take your assumptions as true. 1.) The real heat of the issue is PC vs non-PC 2.) However in this case, in our society, and in the tech world, those arguing for PC tend to be feminists and those attempting desperately to avoid wasting their time talking about PC are the men getting things done. Taking those 2 assumptions to be 100% valid, I still don't think this is a MR issue. It is not targeted at men. Sure, most men don't want to be PC so they are often targeted, but they are not targete…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:36 PM
-3

How childish and immature. I refuse to believe that being "NICE" about things is a "female" thing. Make a case Men are nice sometimes. Women are not nice sometimes. Case closed. Since you where unable to conclude this on your own I have given up on our discussion. Good day.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 05:27 PM
-3

I'm not actually discussing what's going on with the link op posted. For the record, I think that lady is way out of line. If what you said is true it's even more hilarious. I just don't see how this is a MR issue.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:30 PM
-4

I just did. No you really didn't and unlike you I actually present arguments to back up my statement, you should try that once in a while. Thats your opinion. That I backed up with arguments and examples. Women programmers in a male field is a mens rights issue for sure. What? Not at all. Just women starting to work as programmers when in the past only men worked that job is NOT a MR issue. If you think otherwise, might a offer advice that will help your case, present an argument. Uh yea, that i…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:27 PM
-4

This is a rights workplace issue entirely in regard to feminism and men. You haven't demonstrated that, you went on quite a rant on what a annoying person this women is which I can completely agree with. But a women behaving stupidly is not a MR issue. It doesn't magically become a MR issue because there is talk about GENDER. Laws that trait man unfairly -> MR issue Sexism against men -> MR issue Woman trying to enforce her POV and threatening if she doesn't get her way? -> Not an MR issue Not e…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:15 PM
-5

Would you are to explain why it is? I don't see unfair laws or sexist actions.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:56 PM
0

That's all well and good... but you haven't demonstrated how that is relevant to the MRM. I say it again, niceness, rudeness, political correctness are not female specific. There is no inherent sexism in forcing people to be nice. Men are not generally more rude, not pc, unfriendly or what ever than women. It's not a female specific character trait to force ones view on to others. This subreddit constantly battles with it's own extremists and it's important to not have the front page be plastere…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:44 PM
5

Make a case.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:27 PM
2

I refuse to believe that being "NICE" about things is a "female" thing. I can tell you in several ways that you are wrong without calling you names. Personally in my private time I don't have a problem with strong language or rude words, but in a work environment I prefer to keep things civil. Rudeness is antagonizing and antagonizing stifles productivity. The fact of the matter is, being nice is more effective in the work place. Doesn't mean you can't call out bad ideas or behaviors, just do it…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 02:47 PM
-11

Downvoted, simply because -> Not in the least a MR issue. I liked the story, just not in this sub.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 12:32 PM
0

Don't know why you are being downvoted. Don Jon isn't perfect, but it had some real good RP knowledge in it.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 04:09 PM
1

The top half of the post seemed pretty sympathetic too. And? It does not contain anything about "helping"! I don't think there is much sense in talking to you. You seem ignorant, sorry man but but you're doing so by defending their hate fueled movement Where in my post have I defended feminism? I haven't. I said I want to participate in a feminist subreddit. We call participation now support? There is no common ground Yeah there is. They want to further womens rights and MRA want to further mens…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:44 PM
2

I can't believe that's all there is too it. Why would the father leave his kids and offer NO financial support? How did the courts not punish him for it? Doesn't add up for me.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:03 PM
1

Again, you are creating a straw man who you fight against, and you project his properties on to me. saying that you want to help feminism Where did I say I wanted to "help" feminism? I never said that. ignore the fact that feminism is the reason we're fighting Depends on how you define feminism. You're the same kind of person who goes around telling everyone not to offend the feminists by telling the truth. No, I'm not. Again you are projecting some character traits on to me which I simply don't…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 01:47 PM
1

"LogicalDebater" Haha , jesus christ dude, you got some issues. I guess you are projecting some kind of straw man personality on me? I'm not really sure. Anyway none if what you said makes any sense to me.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 10:30 AM
1

decanting Yes you are correct! I'll correct my mistake, not a native speaker here :)
/r/MensRights15/01/14 06:57 AM
20

Well, first of all there aren't many people posting and discussing there (could be because they are very ban happy over there). Secondly, half the time they post pity shit that's not important to feminism ( probably happens because nobody is allowed to call the OP out on it). Thirdly, if they have a good post going nobody is calling out the people taking it too far, it all devolves in to a huge circle jerk (why? because they are fucking banning everyone who doesn't agree). I was actually looking…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:32 PM
7

While I think the way this woman presents herself has some comedic value, it's not a MR issue.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 03:48 PM
53

She won't she will instantly accuse you of sexism and your head will explode because your brain can't handle the logical inconsistency.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:35 PM
16

Hard evidence is the only thing that should be allowed in court.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 01:20 PM
2

What? That's insane. Has to be illegal if they are impairing your ability to receive the service from the school that you paid it for because they in acted some hidden agenda you didn't know about or agree to before hand.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 10:11 AM
0

Who would ever CHOOSE to visit such a demented school? Jesus.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 05:39 PM
31

Rape culture is real, just not the way feminists envision it.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 07:15 PM
12

By the amoutn of downvotes he got I would say this subreddit does not support his views. Don't give me the "invaded" argument, reddit admins dislike that and surely they would do something about it as other subreddits have been banned because of it (or threatend) even this one.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 02:43 PM
2

Dude, this shit is so fucked up. If my gf hid a pregnancy from me and got a secret abortion because I said I didn't want to have kids 3 fucking times I could never trust that woman again, ever. I would also assume that she has some kind of mental issues. This shit is fucked up.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 05:26 PM
17

It's because there motives are cruel and vicious. If I make an offensive joke I play on the real opinion some disturbed people have. If they make a offensive "joke" (if you can even call it that) it's more of a counter offensive, an attack and therefore not funny. It's called SJW for a reason, they don't want Social Justice without the Warrior part, without the fighting, killing and punishing others.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:41 AM
1

well that makes much more sense! ...errr no wait
/r/MensRights29/12/13 08:40 PM
3

god had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 08:04 PM
69

Dude, you couldn't even fucking use the straight line "feature" in paint? Come the fuck on you lazy ass.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:00 AM
5

No. Women are humans like us. We have some different parts and our brains work slightly different but they are not "inherently" anything, just like us. I love my gf very much and my mother is an incredible woman. I'm an MRA because I want to work against the unfairness and imbalance in the law, not to put woman down. TL;DR: The Red Pillers can fuck right off.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 10:57 AM
1

Still does NOT make it rape. I'll grant you that the assistant might have some extra sway in this case, but it still is not rape unless you want to declare every boss who fucks one of his subordinates a rapist.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 10:05 AM
1

Not illegal where I am from, the heart of Europe.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 10:02 AM
1

imho a 16yo can say no to a teacher, but at least the teacher has direct an real power over a student, unlike an assistant
/r/MensRights12/11/13 10:11 PM
-2

What ever the reason is, it is not necessarily "power difference". Saying it can ONLY be that, is stupid. It may very well be that, it may very well be very often that, but it doesn't have to be that.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 07:41 PM
-2

it would from my side
/r/MensRights12/11/13 05:32 PM
-11

jesus, he is 16 and she is an assistant. a 16yo boy knows how to say no to an assistant.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 04:26 PM
0

I would be careful with country choosing a country as absolute standard and using that to define terms like rape. Laws are neither moral nor global absolutes in what is right and what is wrong.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:11 PM
-3

Geeez First of all, I would be very careful with laws defining what is morally okay and what not Secondly using specific country laws to set a global standard. You are delusional in that you seem to only believe in some laws and some personal views as absolutes akin to zero tolerance laws in America.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:44 PM
-5

Clearly you suffer from some grand delusions.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:32 PM
1

Actually it is rape due to the fact she is in a position of power over her student Actually no, that is stupid, or would you call it rape if a guy fucked his secretary? The rest of your post is retarded dribble as well.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 12:42 PM
8

A 21 yr old only has sex with a 16 yr old to enjoy the power difference. Really, only. There is no other possible reason than power difference? Please... don't be stupid.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 12:22 PM
30

Sorry, but a 21yo fucking a 16yo is not rape as the top comment right now claims. I think the woman is quite pathetic, but this is not rape, lets not water the term down, feminists are already doing that. €: Top comment no longer claims it was rape.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 11:03 AM
7

Mother makes a stupid decision, doctor fucks shit up big time, boy has to deal with that shit for the rest of his life. So fucked up.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 09:46 AM
3

Fake upvotes are not needed. Upvotes don't enact political & social change
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:19 AM
10

That's exactly it. Forcing social change is almost impossible and often involves bloodshed. Slow one happens when logical and moral arguments convince young minds, as they grow old there influence grows and with that comes change.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 09:09 PM
23

It'll come with time. The more young man grow to young adults the more perspective will shift. Right now the only thing we can do is present solid arguments, sway the undecided.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 07:47 PM
33

Yeah, MRM draws people that dislike/hate or like ranting against women, they think this is the right place and because it draws so many of them it can appear from time to time that it is the truth. That's why we can NEVER stop calling them out on it. MRM is about one thing (mostly), the rights of men. Correcting unfairness, directed towards boys and men. Mostly laws, but also social norms. Call them out when you see women haters and direct the flow of conversation towards constructive topics.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 07:27 PM
5

This blog shit is pure garbage. Don't upvote because you think a radfem wrote it, it was written by a very bitter man.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:23 PM
3

Nope. My mother did ALL the homework and also worked full time with lots of overtime all my life and still does. But nobody forced her. If she would have been forced people could bring an actual argument to the table, but just stating "well women do more homework!" gets you nothing. They do more homework because they choose to do it.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 10:46 PM
3

is sufficient to require Mr. Cornelio to continue to contribute toward the children's material needs Of course. It's always the childrens needs. The need of the man? Not important.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:58 AM
3

Woman hits man, these people have no response. Woman hits man again, still no response. Man raises hand as threat to stop women hitting, these people say "Terrible evil bad man, you must not hit women". Man lowers hand. Woman hits man again, these people say nothing. That is such an extreme example, I demand a real life example of this and I want you to define "these".
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:47 PM
2

which means effectively encouraging the other 50% to carry on. You can interpret it that way, or you just take it at face value and don't. Without knowing the exact intent behind it it's all guess work. They don't like several thousand men hitting women but they don't care if several thousand women hit men. Now that is just stupid, because they aren't doing anything against it must mean they are for it? I don't actively do anything against rape, doesn't mean I'm for it.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:40 PM
-4

I thought about this replay a good while and formulated some out but the only correct conclusion I come to that yes, It is a double standard, but it's based on reality. Women deal with a different kind of domestice abuse, in the mainstream domestice abuse is something predominantly affecting women. If you want to change the narrative, change the double standard you have to attack from a different angle. Whining about this campaign makes you seem petty and stupid. Addressing the problem that YES …
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:05 PM
-6

Race = Gender? No it doesn't so that comment makes little sense. I really do hate it when this subreddit makes me sound like a feminist, you guys are too extreme when a moderate seems like the other extreme.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:42 PM
-1

So, just because I'm willing to do something about a particular image doesn't mean I want to do it the most PC way possible. As long as they aren't shaming men or saying men can't be the target of domestic violence I don't think we have a right to dictate what they do. This is MR not Feminism, some people seem to forget that all too soon.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:39 PM
4

On one hand, I thin making it gender neutral would be good. On the other hand, I can understand when a bunch of women get together and prepare something to advocate for there specific problem even if there is a compareable problem. To elaborate, I'm okay with prostate chancer awareness etc. without turning it in to "awarness for all kinds of chancer! why are you esxluding breast chancer!". As long as they don't say men can't be abused, I'm fine with it.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:20 PM
4

Yes and the rest are the exception to the rule. I see no conflict there.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:25 AM
1

For most of the human population, sex = gender.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:07 AM
1

No u haha.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:35 AM
2

You are confusing gender roles with actual gender.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:34 AM
13

that thread is blowing up, holy cow, and SO many MR issues. pretty fantastic
/r/MensRights17/09/13 10:10 PM
5

This thread was just awesome all around.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 08:39 AM
2

It really isn't.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:35 PM
3

That's not what you originally said.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:54 PM
7

It's still called censorship....
/r/MensRights15/09/13 12:08 PM
9

Exactly. That dude made so many fucking mistakes, really doesn't deserve anyones pity. He also doesn't seem to have learned from the experience, instead of realizing his mistakes he "doesn't want to go on a date ever again" as if that was the problem. Moron.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 08:42 AM
17

Censorship doesn't only apply to the government.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 08:38 AM
39

It's always the same with these people. They just don't give a fuck about "other people" and problems that generally concern " other people". All it takes is for her son to be wrongly accused and she will instantly sing a different tune.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:06 PM
2

exactly
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:42 AM
1

despite the fact that by your own admission you're so fat that you can't breathe properly. Hahahahaha, wow you are stupid ^ ^
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:27 PM
6

Wow that makes me sad.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:27 PM
1

You bore me. You are reiterating your points over and over and not adressing the larger issue. I feel like I have won because I have more bonuses on my side and you are not doing a good job of coutnering that argument. You have longer life expectancy by a few years while I have a WHOLE life full of strong bodies. You have fewer medical problems and I don't bleed out of my dick for 30-40 years. You say we tend to be more aggressive? Well let me make the counter argument that women because they la…
/r/MensRights07/09/13 08:19 AM
34

That shit is insane. He is not privileged to have the information what meds his daughter is on even thou he has to care for her? haha, is this lady completely retarded?
/r/MensRights07/09/13 08:01 AM
1

without any supporting evidence, just your words alone, as if that's adequate Now you are being intellectually disingenuous. It is accepted by you that men are on average stronger and faster. I said "male body (on average) is superior to the female body" which means that yes, some tasks especially those requiring small hands and a low center of mass favor women but on average, summing everything up, men come out ahead. Your source of strength is also a weakness...ironic, eh? Not a physical weakn…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 04:40 PM
1

Boring.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 09:13 AM
1

Okay I'm bored with you know. You ignore 90% of my post only to make 2 completely stupid points that outright lie about what I said. "Our bodies are better because they wear out faster"? That's not what I said you stupid cunt. I said we die sooner, because we do hard labor which most women can't do. This hard labor wears our body's. you are able to understand that there are women who outperform you and are healthier, and yet you still sit there and insist that men are physically superior, period…
/r/MensRights06/09/13 07:50 AM
-1

You said women are inferior because of strength and speed. Yes they are. On average they are physically inferior. You can rattle down a list of things but I would say strength and speed cover A LOT of physical tasks. So what I'm saying is, initially I only meant physical tasks, but now that I think about it. The male body is on average overall better than the female body. We don't have periods. That is a huge bonus girl, admit it. Sorry that I don't explicitly write it in every sentence but post…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:44 PM
4

By this logic, you are inferior to every person out there who is stronger and faster than you Yes, my lifting power is inferior to every person that can lift more than me. Buhu, whats the big deal. Also I said "on average". So, please read. You have self worth issues if you make such a big deal out of this for real. Women live longer than men on average. Yes they do. You thin, this somehow hurts my feelings? And all of it points to a deep-seated need on your part to feel superior... which makes …
/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:10 PM
2

Men don't bleed/stomage pain for 5-7 days every month. We win. Hehe, yeah I just posed that because she wrote "in any way" but if I start thinking about it if we tally up all the shit a modern person has to do I still think men come out on top. Sure women give birth but they still need us to produce and they need somebody else to care for them while they are pregnant and after so I can't count that as a win. I'm open to other people changing my mind but not having stomach pain and bleeding once …
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:08 PM
2

Nearly all women are at some point in their lives capable of producing new human beings. So? They still need a men for semen at some point and they also need other humans to protect and care for them while they are pregnant, so I don't really see that as a valid argument, at all. Again I want to point out that, it doesn't really matter today who is stronger. We are out of the caves and brain power > muscle power. Should this not be encouraged? Did you over read my first sentence? My first and mo…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:55 PM
-4

I won't go linking this to SRS or anything Thanks, I guess? Not that I care much. I'd just like to say one person to another, you hurt my feelings. Buhu. Truth hurts sometimes. I honestly didn't know some men thought of women as being physically inferior to men. Really? Pretty much every men knows that women are physically inferior to men. It's a given. but I don't feel like it's inferior Well, physically you are and your feelings on the matter don't really influence reality. You will never be r…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:53 PM
2

Yeah, it is really weird.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:49 PM
3

On average man are physically superior. Not that it matters much in modern life but I don't see the need to to this obvious lie in to a "good" "article".
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:48 PM
4

Women aren't physically inferior. If we count strength and speed, yes they are. So what? Well, nothing. That's it. You are inferior in that respect. Not that it matters much today. In other ways we are equals. Yes, but in that respect we are better on average so we are superior. doesn't make me inferior. in that respect it does. Whats the big deal? Why can't you just own up to it?
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:09 PM
35

Most of it was a good read and I can agree with most of it in fact. But I don't understand why she feels the need to have half truths or just outright lies : Women are not in any way physically inferior to men in her article. Women are physically inferior to men, that is a sad fact for women to accept but it's biology and there is nothing you can do. Also: "My wife would kill me!" he said. "And so," I muttered under my breath, "your wife is happy, but you'll never promote a deserving woman." Nic…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:57 PM
0

I'm against defacing payed ad space.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:45 PM
1

Would be interesting to talk with a lawyer about both cases in contrast with one another.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:19 PM
1

I don't know anything about Judo.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:13 PM
1

Hehe, how old are you buddy? I'm not defending anything, I actually disagree with the law if you read my last sentence. But the facts are that he did break the law and the court found him guilty by following what the law stated. The courts did factor in all the relevant information and gave him a light sentence to reflect that. I disagree with the law and I think what 2 consenting adults do in the sack is between them and nobody else but you can't escape the facts and by ignoring them and solely…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:54 PM
1

Really? Well that's one way to interpret it and if we did so it would make sense. Maybe we are a bit biased in this sub, but that didn't really occur to me at all.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:02 PM
2

At least certain people are.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:18 PM
141

Hehe the poster has 2 problems. First of all it's not unisex and secondly "really saying". So what she is saying doesn't matter, what matters is what she is really saying. Turn that around and "She said no, but what she really meant was YES!" becomes reality. Stupid ad. €: thx garb
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:09 PM
2

I think it's something worth discussing if we had a case at hand where this was the case. I'm not a fan discussing ifs, with a real news article as backdrop we can discuss real life cases which is a whole lot better.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:33 AM
4

I think user "Emerentia" directly on the site got the right idea. He was punished because strangling somebody to the point of fainting them is dangerous and can have real long term consequences. You could argue if this is good or bad or right or wrong, but as the law stands he was guilty. Personally, I think if you consent to it without coercion, the consequences are on you.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:00 AM
2

Reddits admins seem pretty inconsistent.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:42 AM
3

To answer this question with anything but generalized statements is incredibly difficult and I don't think could be done in any competent way. So here is my simple and generalized statment on how I plan to raise my kid (what ever gender it may be) so that it won't turn out to be an asshole. Self reflection: view your actions from the perspective of others Logic and Consistency: Your actions should be consistent in all areas with logic that isn't broken. 2 Golden rules: Everyone should be free to…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:34 AM
2

Well, that is just plain old sexism. Or, plain new sexism? Or plain old sexism in new cloths? What ever it is, it's sexism and the very reason this sub reddit exists and also the reason why it is legit. Who ever says there are no real issues, point them to this, it should shut them up.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:52 PM
1

bläh you are retarded
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:04 PM
0

What else is there to say, may argument is waterproof yet some people seem to believe that "Well we could include it, make it slicker at the same time and gather more positive reactions with it by reducing the offensiveness, but fuck that shit cause reasons."
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:43 PM
0

Yeah and you are the retarded one.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:40 PM
0

Yeah you are retarded, congratz.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:32 PM
1

It is not "stupid" or "shit" because it fails to account for the minuscule number of circumcisions carried out for medical reasons where there is no other choice. No it's shit because it could be made easier to read, less condescending and more accurate all at the same time. How is that so hard to grasp for you? Like, what the fuck is wrong with you.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:48 PM
1

But not for everyone. So? I don't see what the issues is, the chart is shit compared to what it could be because it could be made simpler, less condescending AND more correct all at the same time.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:00 PM
1

But there are some, so this chart is flawed. It's also stupid in that, it goes a very long way to deliver a simple message that can be put much faster much easier with less antagonizing going on.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:18 PM
3

It's very condescending and doesn't allow room for medical cases. The most upvoted post in this thread makes a much better case.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 08:55 AM
1

I think it's weird that you would want to pay for the food of the other guy in the date. I mean, both people are on a date right? They are both invested in the date so they can both pick up there end of the bill, everything else seems just like the man is hunting for the approval of the women like he is already invested in her and is trying to convince her that he is worth it. Seems quite pathetic to me.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:41 PM
1

I don't believe that men are outright oppressed though. We are not and neither are women. There are social and structural unfairness in the system, custody another good example. Some exist because women are seen as weaker and more deserving of help, other exist because men are seen as stronger and less deserving of help. Some exist because of women some because of men. MRM is about freedom of speech and eradicating those unfairnesses. We don't censor like feminists do and we don't hog all the is…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:54 PM
1

Feminism doesn't really put any effort in any men's rights problem. Those 2 issues you named are real, but just 2 out of many. All solvable if we focus on the issues and not what role the other gender plays in them.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 05:26 AM
1

You and me both. How awesome would it be to not be ashamed of the front page? Where non issue joke posts like this are filled with women generalizing statements? Can't we just fill the front page with actual problems, like laws that treat men unfairly, institutions handling us like second class citizens. Social norms that force certain behavior on us? How glorious would that be.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:33 PM
-2

Hahaha, yeah what ever dude.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:35 PM
1

I doubt its an oversight wooooosh
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:27 PM
0

The majority does not believe that the key to a happy marriage is to always give in to a womans demands.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:54 AM
0

The shirt. The shirt is a Joke and I'm getting annoyed with how posts like this make this sub reddit seem to new people just wondering in. It makes it easy to portray this sub reddit as a bunch of women hating losers. Get annoyed and angry at real shit. I dislike that real issues have to fight over frontpage space with crap posts like this filled with comments about women and how much they suck. How awesome would it be if the front page was nothing but real institutional unfairness towards males…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:30 AM
7

I don't really give a shit about this. Yeah it's fucking weird but it is a deal between 2 consenting adults. Nobody is forced to do anything here.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:18 AM
5

What does it symbolize? There have been shirts with jokes on them for a long time. Poking fun at everything, not just men, not just women but things and concepts. Getting upset about a joke is pathetic. Get upset about real problems and focus on those.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:00 AM
1

My opinions are in line with a lot of moderate MRA members.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:58 AM
-1

It's a JOKE.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:55 AM
166

You guys getting srsly upset about a joke t-shirt? A joke T-Shirt poking fun at women of all things because you actually think the content is to be taken at face value? Holy fuck, it's clearly just playing the "old chain and ball" kind of joke, where the husband tells the women "yes my dear you are so correct" so she will leave him a rest and he can do what ever he wants. It's an old an tired concept that women won't stop nagging until you give them victory.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:55 PM
92

This is pretty simple actually. She's a cunt. There's no cure for being a cunt, so lets avoid her.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:35 AM
2

Man up normally means, just deal with the situation at hand and not complain. What I'm saying is, they should complain and not deal with crap they don't want to deal with, just move paste it.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:50 PM
16

Major reason why we are in the shit right here. Most men just settle, they just deal, they just accept. If they had more self respect that wouldn't happen, the other way around as well.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 02:23 PM
10

What they wan is fairly irrelevant at this point. What Men are willing to give is the important part. That feminists do not want equality has been shown over and over again, efforts should focus about educating men about there options.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:36 PM
4

I can't actually listen to these questions. The way they phrase them, the way they talk. I know I'm being really shallow right now but it makes me actually angry how stupid the questions are and how stupid they sound asking them.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:30 AM
1

To be honest, if somebody touches my kid for no reason I'll punch him in his face instantly. I don't give a shit. Ofc, escalation and such makes sense, but if you lay a hand on my child, you get shit faced. And while I disagree with you, you won't get banned in this subreddit, because we are not fucking cunts.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:27 PM
6

Nothing good can ever come from the a text posted in this subreddit, ain't that right. Only by the virtue of being posted here it literally means that the post has no value, regardless of viewpoint or argument. god damn it, fuck you best of, fuck.you.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:58 PM
1

I haven't quite made my mind up on this. On one hand he seems to life in ignorant bliss and reality would crush that happiness for him. On the other hand he is being made a fool off, what is the right play and why?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:29 PM
6

the only way to change it is to do it , will probably take a generation thou, as with all cultural norms, always takes a generation
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:04 PM
10

I would prefer a relaxed short to a skirt simply because it isn't revealing when sitting legs spread apart :P but if i couldn't wear shorts in this heat I'd go the skirt route as well
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:07 PM
1

No. It's run be feminists isn't it? No discussion allowed.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:17 PM
23

That is not the core of your argument thou. A good line of reasoning will scale well, meaning it can be driven to it's extreme and still make sense. You may enjoy it, that is fine for you, but on principle, it is not okay to remove parts of a child's body for no reason other then cultural norms.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:45 AM
0

You clearly give enough to reply.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:32 PM
1

Statistics don't real, only feelz! That is how you sound right now.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:42 AM
21

It's only sexist when men do it, comes to mind.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 07:49 AM
-3

Are you an ignorant fuck or just retarded?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:40 AM
2

What I wonder is why everyone takes his word for it We take what we see and comment on it, nothing more nothing less He says he would just "pop in," but that means he didn't abandon his daughter. Also means he wasn't a constant reliable present for the child (which a father should be) Is there something wrong with a girl maintaining loyalty to her real father? Depends, is she more loyal to a guy who just pops in and out than to the guy who pays all the bills and is a constant present in her life…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:36 PM
12

Female only places are good and needed and perfect for equality. Boys clubs are the devil because I can't be in them waaah waaah wahhh
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:55 AM
10

A huge victory for equality!
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:14 AM
2

Don't marry. Why should you, whats the big deal? You can do everything you want without being married. Trust me, it's better that way.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:55 PM
33

White man? You better be prepared to take it up the ass from everyone but young white man because if you don't everyone is gonna jump you, even other young white men.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:45 PM
42

Yeah it's a very good article, but all I can think about is this: "If her son was a daughter claiming somebody raped her with no evidence at all she would be praising this law." It sickens me that people don't start objectively thinking until they get slapped in the face.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:50 PM
-1

What the fuck!
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:17 PM
2

And if that person where to represent the mainstream opinion of woman I would say, have at it. But this is not the case, luckily.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:58 PM
9

Worthless submission. It is my understanding that if you want to change things you need to talk about real problems from the real world and not rage at some crazy Internet lunatic.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:43 AM
2

I don't have a problem with this at all. I honestly don't have a problem with "gender" only events, be it male or female.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 09:05 PM
6

Yeah but you see, thats the fault of the patriarchy and internalized misogyny. /s Bulletproof arguments.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:36 PM
4

pathetic. these feminists are pathetic
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:49 AM
7

Please, OH PLEASE, show me that front page SRS top upvoted thread in the SRS subreddit that complains about somethings sexist against man.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:16 PM
11

thank you(!), I'm still learning
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:15 PM
108

Isn't that the same argument rapists use to excuse themselves after "fucking" a woman? Isn't that the same line of reasoning that drives women insane after they experienced an orgasm from there rapists? No, this is much simpler. Because it's a boy, it's not an issue. Because it's a male everything sexual MUST please him, "he" wants it because all men want to fuck all the time. That is also why a woman can never rape a man. These people preach against sexism all day every day to a point everyone …
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:59 PM
4

I searched for one a while back but couldn't find anything. I would love to round out my browsing pleasure with womans issues but unfortunately I couldn't seem to find any subforum that didn't just complain about the stupidest things and really presented statistics and legitimate cases of discrimination. So I'd be really interested if somebody had something subscribe worthy.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:30 PM
25

I can not comprehend how a dick joke can somehow be anti-female. I do not understand how a grown woman can feel threatened by a "dongle" joke.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:51 PM
5

Yes. A woman can literally never do wrong against a men.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:27 PM
7

I want you to fulfill my romantic needs while constantly apologize that your gender is horrible. Something thats completely impossible. It's extremely problematic for these girls to find a men, because they actually want good looking, smart, charismatic, confident guy, who also agrees with there feminist views. Which as you can Imagen, is extremely rare.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:23 PM
6

I think the point is that men should just... get there shit together and satisfy womens romantic needs. As always, these feminists don't want equality but preferential treatment for women.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:21 PM
8

Can't really comprehend this article. Nobody in the western world of any importance actually believes men are too weak to control there own urges and that concept is what this whole article is built on. I have stood up girls in the past, not because i couldn't help myself but because I felt like being a douche, nothing more and nothing less o_O
/r/MensRights22/03/13 07:17 PM
1

you are so fucking retarded if that is the case, that only a minority (how small can it be? you mentioned drug culture, great so it can be REALLY small) than we live in a "xyz culture" where xyz can be almost EVERYTHING so it becomes completely pointless good job , rape culture is pointless and i don't mind if we live in one because its nothing special
/r/MensRights15/03/13 02:36 PM
1

victim blaming The majority will NOT blame the victim of rape. trivializing rape the WASTE majority will NOT trivialize rape calling back on a previous argument, if only the minority does a certain thing you can hardly call it a cultural problem.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:23 PM
1

I have already said, people that believe in the theory you propose must also accept that we live in a "xyc culture" where xyz is every regularly committed crime. which means pointing out a specific xyz becomes pointless rendering "rape culture" pointless.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:51 AM
1

What are your commandments thou? Thou shalt state my personal opinion as fact. Thou shalt not post any proof. Thou shalt behave like a fucking cunt.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 08:36 AM
3

That doesn't demolish anything because the theory doesn't claim that all people in the culture have to believe that women ask to be raped. If the minority in a culture believes a certain things, you can hardly call that culture anything based on the minority. I have a very clear what you are talking about, a bunch of retarded bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:52 PM
3

We don't live in a rape culture by that definition either you mongrel. The idea that women who wear short skirts or drink beer with guys or agree to visit a guy's room are "asking for it" Every person can agree that a woman who does this is at a higher risk than the one who stays at home. Some people may say "she was asking for it" but the WAST majority does not say that. The rest of this list can be demolished just as easily. You fail on every level.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:44 PM
3

I did, you are still wrong.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:38 PM
3

Sorry you can't even comprehend a simple sentence you moron. I'm sorry for all the poor fools that are forced to have real life contact with such a retard baby.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:34 PM
3

That is actually what the sentence says thou, it says that rape culture is this AND this AND this AND this, AND means that these things should all happen in a rape culture. That's basic English.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:32 PM
3

Yeah, how? Can you explain how I did that? Because i bolded the most important part.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:24 PM
3

It seems you don't know anything about it. I presented a direct quote. You did neither show me how I was wrong nor did you offer me the same quote or a different one with your own interpretation. Your whole argument is: "You are wrong, go and read more and you will see that I AM RIGHT." Well fucker, you are not.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:00 PM
3

It's stupid to argue against a direct quote that I provide if you can't even produce anything of any substance besides your own rambling.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:35 PM
3

I did and guess what, I came to a different conclusion than you. Based on the part that I quoted you. God you are shitty at debates.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:23 PM
3

So you are still unable to quote from the source to support your statement? Ok.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 07:34 PM
4

Oh you are still babbling bullshit without any shred of proof, without quoting anything, without demonstrating that your statement is indeed supported by a argument that is backed up by a fact. Yeah, a lot of hot air, nothing else.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:57 PM
6

There is the wikipedia definition which you don't agree with. I think that definition is pretty accurate. And there is your definition, which has no teeth because it's not threatening at all.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:39 PM
3

Is it illegal to not care about your definition of rape culture? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:22 PM
5

Yeah, the words become pointless. In that case, i ave no problem living in a rape culture. Bring it on.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 05:13 PM
4

Okay so we do live in a thief, murder, drunk driving, ect. culture. nice
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:41 PM
6

Well that just makes the word meaningless and it's not consistent with the wikipedia description. Based on those 2 things I'd say you are wrong and i am right.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:20 PM
9

If that is the case that we also live in a murder culture. We actually live in every culture possible since the definition is so broad it can be applied to everything. Thief culture? Check, we have anti theft devices. ect.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:47 PM
5

I'm not miss-interpreting anything. Rape culture per definition is a culture where rape is "ok" or people are at least apathetic towards it. Which is NOT the case, we all fucking hate rape and we have a bunch of laws to deal with the criminals who commit it. People that rape get publicly shamed, nobody wants to associate with a sex offender.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:45 PM
7

You are wrong with that. Rape culture means that we live in a society that rape and sexual violence are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media normalize, excuse, tolerate, or even condone rape. No wester country has rape culture. No where is rape normalized or tolerated.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:39 PM
0

Because it's not what he had coming. Yeah he/she did. And resorting to revenge for . . . well not even crimes really isn't what civilized people do. So what? And you're a troll. Nope. A brief review of your post history shows that you just like to stir up shit and insult people. brief look is all it takes to misjudge somebody. You haven't really contributed anything to this thread. Which I suspect isn't a new thing for you. But you sure did buddy right?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:16 PM
0

Instead we haven't defended the cheating or condemned her for being cheated on. So both your notions are wrong. Not my notion at all. I just don't see the point in jerking each others dicks because a cheater got what he had coming. The main reason i voiced my opinion in this comment thread was because, you guys are all flipping your shit over this in an extreme manner.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 11:44 PM
-2

Oh, i demolished your retarded statement but I'm the troll, gg children logic wins again.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:06 PM
-1

Suck my dick bitch. €: I up voted you in the past so obviously you aren't a little whiny cunt all the time, but this time, you are.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:06 PM
-2

Okay so selling stuff is the same as beating now? Wow flawless logical victory you fucker.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:26 PM
-4

I like it.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:02 PM
-7

We are not discussing the article in this subthread you retarded baby, the subthread starter said "if my husband cheated, i would do the same", thats what this subthread is about.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:02 PM
-5

We are not discussing the article in this subthread you retarded baby.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 03:01 PM
-10

Yep, I mean come on, he fucking betrayed her trust but clearly SHE should be scorned for getting revenge right? God you guys are fucking pathetic sometimes.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:06 PM
-6

Yep, such bad luck, having a wife that would try to get revenge because he emotionally abused her.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:02 PM
-6

If people look at my posting history they will see I'm very much Pro MRM, but I'm with you on this one. Cheaters do not deserve our pity. Fuck em. I'd help you.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:01 PM
5

Wasn't there a case where a guy pierced the condome with a needle and got sued or something? Couldn't he do the same?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 02:54 PM
2

Are you kidding me, these freaks want to ban porn? Hahahaha, first of all the industry behind porn is huge. Secondly, nobody gets to tell me if i can look at dirty pictures on my pc or not. If this happens Austria will break off the EU for sure, I'm not even kidding. We already have a political group gaining power because all the frustrated voters go to that party, if that happens all the young man and even older males will flock to the anti eu party.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:38 AM
29

More posters! More public drum circles! More public shaming! More sensibility classes!
/r/MensRights06/03/13 04:00 PM
9

I think a good attorney could argue that the sperm bank is liable ....
/r/MensRights01/03/13 09:30 AM
6

Objectification either way is not inherently a bad thing. Besides, the ad just shows that nobody has a problem fucking a woman that was fucked before if she is still in good condition, so why worry about it?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:51 AM
1

The point is that she DOES need man to accomplish all these things, jeez people you blind?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:52 AM
2

you fucking retarded or something? people get molded by there surroundings, it takes a certain kind of person to self reflect
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:02 AM
2

Whats the matter? just let the woman dance with her daughter? wtf?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 10:22 AM
15

Lolz "Why don't you just convict these man! My feelings are all the evidence you neeeeeeeeeeed!" Pathetic, can't believe the news even picket up on that.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 01:06 AM
1

Its free to people paying almost no or no taxes
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:50 AM
1

Under that argument i should get all my health appliances from my insurance. All of them. Which of course "could" work but the price of the insurance would rise.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:56 AM
1

Look, if we can't agree to talk about actual reality That sentence makes no sense since people in this thread seem to talk about making birth control free for woman which isn't reality right now reality but could be Which is the stuff I said. I already outlined why i think needs to be done.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:23 PM
1

It's only our reality because we make it our reality. There are other solutions. I pay a lot of taxes on average, probably enough to support another human, in full. In fact, i have no problem with that, i believe that we should care for the poorest members of our society. But, if you do something you are responsible for it. So either abort or care for it yourself, if you can not fully support your child it will be taken away and given to a family that can. Done. There are a lot of caring, loving…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:20 PM
1

So? Just giving shit away for free is the solution? No, you made a mistake you are responsible for it, deal with it.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:30 PM
11

So, what happens if both men and woman are trashed and have sex?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:56 PM
3

No. You want to fuck? You pay for it, done.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:28 AM
1

Hold about you hold yourself accountable... I mean maybe you should have stopped after the second one.. maybe? This really is a problem with people not believing in the agency of woman.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:43 AM
1

I can see your point. I didn't mean to say "you should not have posted this" but that this is not a MRM issue. Sometimes people in this subreddit go full on woman hating and behavior policing and i just wanted to point out that thats not one of the MRM goals.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:31 PM
1

Honestly, this is not a MR issue. Sure, we have woman here behaving in a manipulative manner, but so what? Like just ignore them. They can only harm you as much as you let them, they are not trying to force something on to you or reduce your rights. I met a few woman like that back when i was still dating and i just ignored them and moved on to woman socially more acceptable. They only hold as much power as you give them so just don't give them any. NOT a MRM issue, MRM is not about policing per…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:34 PM
2

I don't think it's as rare as you think. I slept with at least 3 woman that could come very easily from g point stimulation alone. But that is besides the point, not every form of female circumcision includes removing of the clitoris.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:07 AM
3

Well we ahve huge brains , don't we? So we can controle our urges but it is indeniable that the drive for sex is in men much stronger than in woman, evolution and all.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:37 AM
5

I can make my girlfriend cum in under litterally 5 min with my finger simply by stimulating the g point. What now? Your world view is shetterd, are you crying?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:12 AM
3

It's always the same kind of argument. MRM argue that it's unfair that 1 party has all the decision power and the other party has zero but is equally responsible for the outcome of the decision. Other people tell us to "man up" pretty sick of it tbh.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:24 PM
3

Pathetic, idk seems like a troll tbh.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 01:57 AM
5

Can't believe wrong statistics are so persistent if this information was already being corrected this long ago. Just goes to show how little people actually care about the truth.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 01:56 AM
1

How is that rude, or insulting? Almost certainly 20 years ago he didn't have a bursting ego because his gf out earned him and he couldn't hold down a good job. Especially in a world that tells you to take care of your wife and to be the bread winner.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:17 PM
1

how am i doing that?
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:53 AM
2

Defining howa real men looks like / talks / walks is in itself, stupid. Nobody get's to tell you that you are a bad man or that you failed in being a man. There are no minimum requirements like earning money, lifting weights or even being nice to other people that you have to fulfill to count as a real man. Beware of the people that want to force there stereotypes upon you, they don't want to "improve you", they only want you to fulfill some kind of need for them. You decide how you want to live…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 10:58 AM
0

this has NOTHING to do with mens right, this news article has literally nothing to do with MRM, if you want news about kids and post in threads about kids why don't you go to r/kids or something you wacko
/r/MensRights18/01/13 10:38 AM
0

you crazy or something? specific interest groups are for specific things. MRM is here to make sure mens rights are not trampled on. you will find that people IN the mens rights movement are concerned about children but the movement itself has nothing to do with it. it would be something different if a boy is being abused or harassed BECAUSE he is a boy (men) but this was not the case. is that so difficult to grasp?
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:18 AM
1

I have no problem with other people doing what they like ;) If it works out for them that is just fine.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:49 AM
0

people go on probation all the time, just because a woman did something doesn't mean it's a MRM issue! this is not "Men bash woman", if you want to flame woman cause you hate em so much another subreddit would be the place for you to go, this is not it
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:40 AM
3

nothing to do with mrm, shitty people do shitty things
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:33 PM
11

Exactly, if you turn the tables, all of a sudden it doesn't sound so nice anymore.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:29 PM
2

I don't know if the trend is inherently bad or good for men or woman, but i think woman lose out on a lot of things ofc. Getting treated to dinner, man planning the evening trying to prove there worth TO the woman, now it's more equal which feminists should like.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:09 PM
2

Interesting read. The article displays the trend of casual dating as a "bad" thing, which I don't agree with at all. I think it's great, more flexibility more agency for woman.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:30 PM
3

the sexist airline does it to protect the children, but it actually protects the males. you can not trust the legal system to back you up if wrongful accusations are made. if the kid feels uncomfortable and another passenger sees "something" you are done.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:15 PM
1

Yeah , if they can take the "abuse". Sure.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:02 PM
-2

On one hand these men disgust me, honestly. I know we are all apes but we have evolved larg enough brains to hold our primitive urges at bay. On the other hand, the engineer in my sees a CLEAR solution, FUCKING MOVE. Move away from that place it is clear what kind of atmosphere this place harbors. No families should be raised there, no woman should live there useless they specifically make money from it like the whores and strippers that make 500 or 5000 per night there.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:32 PM
45

So called ‘paternity fraud’ is an emotive topic and one I have written about before. Despite hysterical claims, there is still little hard evidence of an epidemic. Clearly it does happen sometimes, and Mr Roswell seems to have been unlucky enough to be a victim. But is he entirely blameless? Victim blaming, nice. It's his own damn fault, why DID he order that test? I mean come on, couldn't he just live with the rumors and the uncertainty. I can only advice every men to do a DNA test asap.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:27 PM
0

As i said, it's clearly sexist. It's just that as it currently stands in the law and how it is enforced against males it's probably for the best.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:39 PM
9

I really hope none of you will come in this thread and start gloating, cause that would be just pathetic. None the less, it doesn't surprise me that she couldn't make it work. I am sure he had ego issues, earning less in a world that tells you to take care of your wife. She even reinforced that stereotype. It is sad story about a woman that couldn't handle out earning her husband and broke both there hearts because of it. I hope one day we will be able to look past that.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 04:30 PM
14

I don’t think he knows: Than why don't you just freaking tell him o_O I don’t know how to get him back into my life. The truth could help, maybe if he doesn't see you as a piece of shit father his opinion will change. I am trashing his mother. If reality trashes his mother than there is no way around it. I don't know why you didn't talk to him truthfully in the past, why you are so hammed to talk bad about your ex wife but put yourself in his position, could you ever love /like a person which yo…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:39 PM
2

stupid topic, you will find countless hate groups while in the general public neither is really present.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:09 PM
11

That depends on what you consider cheating. I consider cheating what you consider cheating as you proved in your next paragraph so i don't know why you even brought that up. I agree that relationships would be more stable if people would be more honest which each other, but i personally still prefer to only have 1 partner at a time.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:53 PM
27

god, could you please link to the actual news and not this blog trash? news article: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17619-its-true-all-the-taken-men-are-best.html journal : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103109001048 on the topic itself, is that not the stereo type of "if I'm single no girl looks at me and since i got that ring on my finger i get hit on all the time?", obviously it is a stereo type for a good reason, cause it's true. Just goes to show woman give in …
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:50 PM
35

Another of those story's that happen so extremely rarely that they actually never happen and we should just forget about them and throw the wrongly accused under the bus. I say NO, innocent until proven guilty!
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:32 PM
4

On one sit, clearly sexist, on the other hand , not the kind that i have a problem with even thou it is directed at me. I really do NOT want to sit besides a kid not only because they are usually more annoying than adults but also because it opens me to the risk of false accusations.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:28 PM
9

It seems they really really REALLY dislike people that disagree with them. Depending on what topic you disagree with them they will choose words to brand (and with that discredit) you.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:43 AM
2

After reviewing the facts it is CLEAR that the title of the youtube video and the submission are misleading.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:10 AM
6

nothing to do with MRM
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:45 AM
38

The title makes me sick, how is cheating EVER going to save a marriage in a meaningful way? retardation but okay, lets look at the article After reading the article, it is clear that it has no real value judgment, it jsut represents data. Data which i find pretty disgusting. *70 percent of wives say the 'other man' is the opposite of their husbands *40 percent view the lover as an escape *Over 60 percent of women will engage in an extra marital affair (including an affair of the mind and a cyber…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:44 AM
25

"part of me hates men" text book definition of Misandry closed it there, makes no sense to watch hate speech
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:38 AM
3

Yeah it wasn't clear at all unfortunately .... it would have been smart to point out who is who exactly.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:02 AM
84

She hits you, you deck her, end of story.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:06 PM
111

LoL “How could the wife possibly have refused to sign under those circumstances?” Woman, responsible for her own actions? How dare you suggest that! Of course she is not capable of handling stress! Woman are flowers that need to be handled with care, you need to make sure she has peace of mind before you let her sign a contract! That is the responsibility of the EVIL EVIL WHITE MALE! pathetic. What does this mean for us men? That wee need to get a psychiatrist attest the state of mind before a w…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:56 PM
10

I kinda start to like this guy, fucking awesome.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 02:50 PM
1

He defended rush Limbaugh after he called that woman who testified for the state sponsored pill a whore. He can't be very smart. Now let me clarify i am NOT for the state to shell tax payer money out to woman or man for condoms or the pill or what ever. If you wan to fuck you better pay for it yourself. But calling that woman a slut was a no go from rush and defending him for it is retardation.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:44 PM
9

That man is angry, for a good reason, that story is outrageous.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:41 AM
34

It's not even close to the sum he has invested in to these children. I find it pathetic as well that this woman does not face some kind of jail time. She cheated him out of his time money and love.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:52 PM
52

I find it pathetic how little money this man is awarded.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:07 PM
3

I have no problem with the woman wanting to give up the child but how careless they ignore the father in every instance.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:04 PM
8

Maybe i miss phrased, even a woman that IS abandoned by the childs father is NEVER abandoned. The state (every other working person with enough smarts to not pop a child unless they can support it) will provide. If she decides to give the child away there has to be some kind of process trying to reach the father and get his decision. Clearly this is not the case.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:45 PM
11

She is NEVER abandoned! The state provides financially for her and ind turn sucks the father dry. There was no court hearing no notification of the father, he was everything but unreachable. This law in it's current form is retardation supreme.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:40 PM
16

Can't believe this video and the punishment she got. If she did that to my child I'll beat her blue.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:27 AM
1

what a retard
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:49 PM
20

I have never in my life seen a real discussion between 2 man if woman are just fuck toys and eye candy or if they are human beings. Maybe a tiny fraction of men think like that but than again you have a tiny fraction of woman wanting to castrate all males. I really do not understand how anyone can take these people serious. There ideas are so outrageously and glaringly wrong, it's like watching a movie with a 1000 plot holes. Nothing makes sense.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:12 AM
6

Nice sentiment, but in the real world he would have to pay for this woman and this child even thou he was raped and no criticism is gonna save him from that. Your view as an onlooker is clearly detached from the horror of the real situation and the only other option he would have had is fleeing the country.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:04 PM
1

Are you actually implying that cutting off a part of your body that is not needed to survive is on the same level as getting a tattoo? You'd argue that part about parents cutting off there children's little toe as well?
/r/MensRights23/12/12 11:02 PM
3

reasonable healthcare Only in 'MERICA can people ACTUALLY think it's a reasonable health care decision to cut off ones foreskin.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:56 PM
16

Agree with you 100% People make mistakes, they do stupid things, that why we designed the legal system to remove the human factor as much as possible. Now this judge throws that all out the window and move on his own hunch. He is not fit to be a judge.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 09:27 PM
3

If this is real, it's fucking amazing. Instant karma.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:47 PM
19

Doesn't surprise me, woman don't like to admit it, but they are still searching/hunting for "THE MEN!" Womans social status has risen sky high in the last few decades, but they are still searching for a mate that is of a higher status which leaves fewer and fewer males able to pass these standards and more and more woman without a suitable mate. Adjustment will occur over the next few decades, ending in the death of the typical male provider role.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:45 PM
7

That sweet sweet privilege, patriarchy man dominated world working out for you yet?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:21 PM
4

My very reasonable girlfriend has no problem with it. Knowing is better than being sure.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:22 PM
0

I edited something to it, my point wasn't clear from what i wrote, sorry.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:32 AM
1

How does that relate to forcing someone's body into doing anything? As parent/caretaker you are FORCED to take care of the child. Like slavery really. If you don't you get sued for neglecting your child. I took notice of you saying "here it can survive without forcing anyone's body into doing anything. Obviously it can NOT survive on it's own and somebody MUST move (a.k.a. moving ones body) to ensure the child's survival.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:29 AM
20

It always baffles my mind when this argument hits the table: "He is not REALLY nice because he is just nice to get your affection/sex!" So, you mean to tell me that being nice to you, slowly winning your heart (like it is portrait in almost every romantic novel and chick flick EVER!) is creepy? That means nice is only nice if you do something without ever expecting/hoping for some kind of pay off? Sometimes i really think you have to sit down with these people and work through almost every word …
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:27 AM
0

I find reading these kind of study's interesting even thou my opinion on the matter can not be changed by it. Up until week 12 the fetus can't feel pain, either you terminate it in week 12 or you carry it out and give it up for adoption.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:22 AM
0

Here it can survive without forcing anyone's body into doing anything. Really? Last i checked baby's can't order pizza.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:15 AM
1

Another shitty example you mean.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:07 AM
2

Kommt vermutlich von der Vorliebe für die Empörung und das Drama bei den Amerikanern. Bei denen ist ja immer alles eXXtreme. Aber zu meiner Aussage stehe ich immer noch. Anekdoten zählen nicht als beweise in einer legitimen Diskussion. Eventuell sollte man ein r/MRMVent subreddit erstellen, wo die Leute dann die täglichen Vorkommnisse zu posten ohne von den wirklich Wichtigen Themen abzulenken. Wie schaut das denn aus? Artikel über Justizunfairheit, ein Kind das verblutet ist weil Ihm die Vorhau…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:54 PM
1

Hmmm, i understand. I don't know if it's the same in the USA but in austria far more woman work in retail stores than man, while man go to become technician working on cars and painters or carpenters woman go in to retail or stuff like that. So if the situation is similar in america i would guess that male employees are too scares to actually have only males work the male change area. If it is indeed as you described than yes, you have a sexual discrimination problem, but anecdotal evidence does…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:38 AM
1

High quality post, saved! We need to get the non controversial topics in to the minds of people, after they accept that man get disadvantaged in some cases we can start approaching more controversial topics.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:29 AM
0

Well we probably live in different country's, I'm from Austria Europe. Most stores don't have gender specific changing rooms and i never had a problem escorting my gf in to the woman's changing room. I am not a MRM denier or anything, in fact you will find in my post history that I know of many injustices done to man but this is not a issue. It's just a boss who doesn't want to shriek away female customers.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:10 AM
-11

Anecdotal evidence of 1 woman clearly shows a disturbing trend that proves conclusively how deeply ingrained anti male mentality is. This blog is legit! To make it clear, I don't count these feminist arguments that because they got hit on by a douche at a club and nobody white knighted her that we live in a rape culture society so i won't let this count either.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:46 AM
5

I don't know the specifics about what happened to you and what you mean by "attempted rape" so i can not make a honest informed judgment.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 04:43 PM
1

Because without marriage a relationship isn't worth anything right?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:23 AM
49

anyone who thinks getting beaten up is less intense than a little sexual harassment has never been beaten up
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:18 AM
7

I have the same problem :(
/r/MensRights23/11/12 11:33 PM
1

Wow, how fucking retarded is that? Go ask the manager to change your baby's diaper herself or (if male) send a female employee to do it since you are obviously not allowed. How retarded is this shit?
/r/MensRights21/11/12 10:14 AM
1

I hope someday you will be dissuaded from calling yourself a Men's Right Activist if you do support rape, male genitalia mutilation, child molestation, and so forth. You hope (you are active) that one day (currently I am not) i will stop calling myself MRA (my current state) if i support ( active) rape ect. I am not a native speaker, but i don't think i got this one wrong. As i was not implying at any point that i do support these things and as you did not use a ? my best guess is you suppose th…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 11:51 PM
1

If you think laughing at a good rape joke is the same as supporting rape, than i think you are just a few steps away from being the SRS of the MRM
/r/MensRights20/11/12 11:22 PM
0

Pfft like you can define what the mens rights movement is. Like you got some kind of authority? I'm a dude, i speak out against the injustice and unfairness of the social construct we have put in place, but that doesn't mean i can't laugh at Jimmy Carr.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 10:59 AM
-1

but I can't seem to understand why mutilating male genitals is considered funny by our social standards. Same argument could be made about rape jokes and jokes about race and jokes about fucking children.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:32 AM
-1

And Jimmy Carr gets "away" with making tons of rape jokes.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 08:31 AM
2

Bet she is really great in the sack . . . cause she is crazy dumb
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:28 AM
-2

Slippery slope fallacy http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:07 AM
0

Well, fuck them.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:05 AM
-2

So how do we combat it? By being equally but hurt? Or.... pointing out the double standard while still making clear that both are a joke? Second options sounds smarter to me, also more laughter.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:04 AM
1

I don't think the reverse is disgusting. Some people might think that but why do we have to apply the mentality of some people to us?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:46 PM
-3

CONTEXT ? Do you fucking know it? Cause i don't. All i see is a pretty funny picture. If my gf left me this i would expect a laugh track to start rolling while i go, "Uh oh, guess I'm in trouble. Well, can't get much worse than that." So than i go and eat her cookies cause, hey why not. Srsly, without context this is just a funny picture and nothing more, don't start blowing shit out of proportion. Save your rage for real stuff.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:33 PM
1

Satire, 100%. Link submissions from the blog should be blocked, waste of time.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:38 PM
6

Don't let this sub turn in to SRS >_> A joke is a JOKE is a joke is a joke.... is still a joke.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:33 PM
2

I can tell exactly that you are this much |------------------------------------------------------| retarded.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:26 PM
2

Okay, you like to play "twist the word" i can play that game too, much better than you in fact. There is no biological reason why women should not be allowed to go topless. Biologically man are superior to woman. Trans people / gay people are just persons with a "birth defect" in the head department. I don't agree with you at all, shame on you! Just cause it is natural doesn't mean its good! It is all a social construct. Which is very bad? Is that why you oppose people that define there own role…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:47 PM
1

In many cultures all around the world, women walk around topless just as much as men do. Yeah but not in our culture. We view them as something else but milk dispensers. Wait, so no man has ever been harassed for wearing a skirt? Wait so, are we talking about NOW or are we talking about the past cause i like to live in the present and not base my arguments on how stuff went down 20 years ago. Wait, so you do support double standards and think they're okay? Depends on what that double standard is…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:39 PM
54

Not just sexy, but photoshoped to be almost perfect.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:02 AM
1

There is no reason that a woman shouldn't be allowed to go topless if she wants to. Well one of the reasons is that tits are a tit bit more sexual than the flat chest of a man. So, there is indeed a reason. I'm not sure why you keep using the term "police." Because that would be ACTUALLY unfair if somebody was actually enforcing these things, but nobody is. The point of a double standard is that it is unfair. Unfair in who's eyes? I think it's unfair that just because I'm not as smart as somebod…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:41 AM
1

Don't you think social expectations on how men and women act, groom, or behave aren't actual issues? Well, first of all you can't all lump them together in one big pile. They are not all the same and if i had to make a list than the general consensus amongst man about the attractiveness of shaved lags would be very near the last place. But my argument is that if we tackle small inequalities like this we can push for equality in other segments. My (much more logical argument) is that we should fo…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:23 PM
2

Great. So let's focus on actual issues first and work our way down to the petty bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:05 PM
3

but you realize women do have natural body hair, right? You think I'm retarded or something? We all come from apes so of course we all still have hair, even thou it's becoming less and less. But for example, my gf shaves her leg hair and so on off cause it just looks/feels better. So, I'm asking, why would you want a woman to change something natural about herself Because, just cause something is natural doesn't mean it's attractive. Natural does not equal good. But if hairy legs were normal But…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:45 PM
4

Double standards are all over the place, but not all double standards are created equal. Man with no cloth on his chest is something different than a woman with no cloth on her chess. it is a double standard but for a reason. Besides, there is no rule against it. You can run around unshaven and man can run around in what ever cloth they choose, but you don't get to police how other people react to you.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:35 PM
-13

If the start attacking you i don't think spraying them with pepper spray is escalating....
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:29 PM
7

We should however push against things that unfairly create bias throughout our lives. Depends what those biases are..... not every bias is created equal. Do you think a woman's hairy legs are inherently less attractive Yes. Body hair is manly (as man have in general much more body hair) so it turns me off if a woman has a male body type. or do you think it's a preference caused by the popular trend in the media? Sure, that adds to it. If you think the former, I can't wait for you to try to suppo…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 10:03 PM
12

What do you mean with double standard? You can't police what people like and what they don't like. It's not shaming to be grossed out by something. I can like what ever i want. You don't get to tell me what i can like and what i can't.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 09:34 PM
15

TL;DR: Anders Breivik was severely mistreated by his mother(wishing him death, sexualized him), the system did nothing against it even thou it was brought to the attention of the authority's several times. Father lost custody battle and was probably not informed about all the womans behavior. It goes on much more but that would be too much for a TL:DR ;)
/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:43 PM
3

Some real privilege right here in this video! Although i think he didn't handle it very well. He should just have applied pain to her hand, knuckle area. If she starts hitting he can just hit back, but what can you expect? He was under an enormous amount of stress knowing quite well that if he hit a woman a bunch of white knight fags would jump in and beat the shit out of him. Disgusting
/r/MensRights10/11/12 08:39 PM
-3

There is no point in being rational with such a person so all i can say to her is this: Bring it on bitch.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:12 PM
7

I really do not understand how the Author thinks this is such a bad thing for woman.... I do not understand how the author thinks it will turn teenage girls in sex machines.... I do not understand how the author thinks that suddenly males will get a LOT more power in relationships.... All this would do is ensure that man don't get children if they don't want to. Which is great but doesn't imply any of the above.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:01 PM
1

What else is there to do? Force people that do not want to take care of the child to take care for it? Is that the alternative? If you think it is a bad idea for the state to assume responsibility and find a loving/caring adoption family at best and at worst a good/regulated/accountable care center than what do you think about a person taking care of the child that doesn't even want it? This is exactly what i mean with you bring NO solutions to the table.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 09:54 PM
1

Against my better judgment ofc. The argument is whether a father should be able to opt-out of being a parent. The answer is, yes. He should be able to opt-out. I've repeatedly asked you how exactly a child opts out of you being its father. The child doesn't it's the fathers decision. the defenseless child would be the actual issue, as it should be. 3 people are involved, each of them responsible for there own (as the child can not care for itself the state should assume that responsibility) Just…
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:19 PM
1

This will be my last replay as you clearly lack reading and reasoning skills. Again, you're only looking at a monetary argument. I said "Right to the biological parents?" so i clearly made a point out of mentioning that you can not realistically force people to play parents if they don't want to. Parenting is not just about the money in fact money is only a small part of parenting and being a parent! You live with the consequences. Again means that you are against what? All abortion and adoption…
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:24 PM
1

So what do you even suggest? What rights should the child have? Right to life? Means no more abortions. Right to the biological parents? Means forcing people in to a nuclear relationship that maybe hate the child for forcing them to do so. The only important thing to me is that if the bunch of cells actual becomes a child it will be taken care of. Adoption, federal support what ever.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:19 PM
1

So? This is not a discussion about the rights of the child. This is a discussion about equality between man and woman. If woman have certain rights man should have them too.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 09:05 AM
1

Why do you think i don't get it?
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:03 AM
1

Equal rights mean if one party has the right to ignore the child, the other party should too.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 06:40 AM
1

Both are issues we should keep on pressing. But i don't like the idea of forgetting anout lps, what if the male pill fails? Nothing is 100%.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:05 PM
4

So... how hard is it to file one?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:51 PM
4

Could you go more in to detail? I don't understand, what is RO?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:48 PM
0

I agree with you but i would remove the last 2 sentences ;)
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:20 PM
5

I realy think that this idea is not only ruining the mens rights movement I think this is one of the biggest causes of the mans rights movement and rightfully so. At this point woman hold all the power and man have none. Inequality at its finest. On to your second statement rights of children I find this statement strange. If you drive this to the extreme children are hurt every time they don't get born in to a wonderful family, with his parents having a lot of love, experience and money. Of cou…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:48 PM
4

It's a fairly big psychological decision which can have serious effects on your life. Like every action in life some people can do them with no problem and some others can't do them at all. I agree with you that abortion is a serious matter and put a woman under a lot of emotional/psychological and physical stress/duress/pain. But, she HAS the option. She also has the option to carry the child to terms and than give it up for adoption, or just drop it off at designated areas. Man on the other ha…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:39 PM
9

There is a LOT work to be done in the paternal rights department. Meanwhile i would like to see man that are not ready to become fathers not getting shafted by woman who hold all the rights. We can fight for more than 1 cause at a time. I fight for equality in paternal rights, that also includes the right of a man to say: "No, i do not want to assume responsibility for this human being." Just like woman. A child is a huge responsibility and not everyone who can fuck is able to assume this respon…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:31 PM
2

Wouldn't they have to prove that they where so drunk that they could not give consent? In a perfect world maybe, not in the one we live in.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:14 PM
7

A mother can not just give her child up for adoption. The father must also consent and if he does not can take on the role of primary provider. Again, mother get's first serving. Not to name the cases where the father has no right because he doesn't know, he is not informed/not named as the father from the mother. Equality means having the right to surrender responsibility if the other person has those rights too.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:14 PM
17

The child is being ignored right now anyway. The woman can decide if she wants to abort the fetus, she can decide to give it up for adoption or just dump it at the hospital. I find it strange that these arguments of the "child's right!" come up if we discuss legal paternal surrender for man.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:44 PM
15

What are you saying? A woman has all the rights to her child, she overrules the child even after birth. She can just "dump" it at a designated area, she can give it up for adoption not surrendering her right to take the child back some day. A man has none of these options, he has no rights at all.he is forced in what ever the woman wants. That is unfair, it is not equality and nobody should stand for it.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:41 PM
5

So? It takes 2 to tango, yet the woman has all the options of how to handle the child and the father has zero.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:39 PM
1

If a mother has the right to give the baby up for adoption or just "dump" it at the hospital and designated areas. The father should have this right as well.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:38 PM
9

Wow fuck you all. A good start, insult everyone reading, nice, classy. I'm an unwanted child. I'm sorry, still doesn't give you the right to insult every stranger. childrens rights Somehow these arguments are made a lot more if we are discussing paternal legal surrender as a mans right and not as a woman's right. My father cheated on my mother and left her. I grew up without my father. Yet I'm still able to acknowledge the imbalance in paternal rights between man and woman.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:36 PM
5

I agree with that.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:31 PM
19

Which means, taxpayers will be funding the irresponsibility of these men No, taxpayers will be funding the irresponsibility of these man and woman. It takes 2 to tango. Woman have a lot of options to get "rid" of a child they don't want. Man have exactly ZERO options.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:31 PM
10

It's not about rights Yeah it is about rights. It's about the mens right to say "No, i do not want this child." A right woman have today and many options to use this right. Abortion, adoptions ect. Financial insecurity would force women to abort their children, give them up for adoption, or taxes would be raised to support single mothers. Yes, i think that is a realistic outcome. Pushing for equal rights on this issue is far more likely to result in banning abortions than abolishing forced child…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:29 PM
2

Your post is completely reasonable. +1
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:56 PM
12

It's advertisement FOR MAN, using a womans body to demonstrate a prducts advantage. So i would say YES, it is sexist. Now the real question is, is it the bad kind of sexism? No, i don't think so. It doesn't degrade woman at all. It just says: "You like boobs don't you? Well, our product is like a woman with 2 pairs of boobs!" Doesn't make any kind of degrading statment so, it's ok in my book. Ofc, some people will say "any kind of sexism is bad!", but i don't care about those people because a wo…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:17 PM
1

I don't know why you got down voted ^ thats a pretty funny quote :P
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:35 AM
1

I'd argue that what he did was more wrong. Than you'd be wrong. Physical assault is on a whole new level, it doesn't even compare.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:05 PM
2

Don't need to understand the full scale. I'm not making any statement son the full scale so i don't need a complete understanding of it. All I'm saying is that physically attacking him was extremely wrong, and is more disturbing than what he did.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:31 PM
2

So you are saying, physically assaulting him was justified or...?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:24 PM
2

In defending I'm not defending his action. I said that: "And that makes the atrocious act that he did okay?" "No" I said no, can you read? CAN YOU ?? Your argument is if a woman did this everyone would be supporting her? It is proven, you can not read. Sorry, go back to school.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:55 PM
6

And that makes the atrocious act that he did okay? No, but i think "atrocious" is a pretty strong word for revealing his dick and i think children can handle a dick. It's just a fucking dick, yo. Not that I'm defending his action but i think people should take offense to the fact that he got attacked. however this subreddit should not be defending him because he is a man Why? If he was a woman on a MR "Walk" and dozens of male participants started physically assaulting her you can bet there woul…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:38 AM
13

He did not cause physical harm. He should not be attacked physically. It becomes a mans rights issue the moment you reverse the genders and everybody sides with the woman.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 11:25 AM
13

At first a thought " a debate with this guy would be fun to watch", than i realized, he is ver yill informed and delusional on this topic and every debate would result in. A: Presenting a fact in favor of the MRM. Him: "LoLoL, thats not true just joke, statistics don't work that way, i don't feel that this is correct so it is not, woman are hated you are a woman hater!"
/r/MensRights23/10/12 08:48 PM
11

Any intelligent human being actually supporting this? I don't think so. You break the rules you get the punishment everyone gets, that is the very definition of equality. I want girlwriteswhat to do a video about this. Fucking insult to woman.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:49 PM
5

I posted something that did not agree with the general tone of the thread. I did not get banned or reported or insulted or deleted. If that is enough to make it a MRM subreddit, well..... than i guess MRM is controlled by Feminists cause i never saw that happening on here.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 10:32 AM
1

I always find it funyn when woman speak about patriarchy ^ If that shit was really real you can bet all your money that powerful alpha males (rich in power and money) makes would have several wives. Why would we settle with 1 hot chick if we could just have a dozenth. Evolution would favor such males cause they would produce more offspring. Patriarchy in general is insane. What do woman think, that they fought for there rights? Hell we gave them that shit after we matured as a society. If man wa…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:35 AM
1

Yes. I got fraudulent claims before, about stuff i should pay. I have a legal insurance and they fought this shit for me.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:47 AM
0

Well i don't know in what fucked up country you live, but that shit ain't going down like that in my country. Somebody doesn't just get fired because a bunch of people complained about a bunch of different things, and the police isn't just saying "well we won't help you cause we don't like you"
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:01 PM
1

You guys don't realize how fucked you are if somebody gets really mad and is educated enough to do something about it. You call 12 pizza places and order 12 pizzas? The police will investigate. Your phone company knows exactly at what point you called what number. You are using a proxy? Your ISP knows exactly at what point you connected to what IP address and a simple warrant will make them release that information. Yes, these little creepers will create a very frustrating , embarrassing and str…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 10:10 PM
16

Pack up your stuff, get a job in a country that doesn't extradite to the USA?
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:52 AM
3

This is a really good video explaining exactly why in our modern world man decide to stay single, they decide to stay home play games go out with there friends have 1 night stands or just "date" some girl and never settle down. because if you do, you are fucked
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:02 PM
-11

I should be a disposable commodity. It's a joke, man up. imagine the shitfest Man joke about woman all the time, comedians joke about them all the time. If they start a shit fest, you know what i tell them? "Grow up." Jokes are jokes are jokes are jokes. I laugh at rape and murder, doesn't mean i would enjoy these things in a real setting.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 08:38 AM
2

Well if that is the choice I'm with you, but the topic on hand is about a different situation.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:26 PM
0

End up dead or forever in jail? Yeah, nice "defending".
/r/MensRights12/06/12 12:18 PM
1

Shit like this doesn't happen in Austria. I feel sorry for Americans, because even thou you have guns you could never defend yourself against a police officer with it.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 11:55 AM
3

People in this thread are totally over reacting with things like "get out" and "run away". I get in some discussions with my other half sometimes as well, what i do is just don't leave it alone. A discussion is like war and you fight for every meter. First you get her to acknowledge small things than bigger ones. Just be open and honest, i got turned around on a few topics and i turned her around on a few topics. The mos important part is that after a discussion you will be one step closer to th…
/r/MensRights10/06/12 10:31 PM
7

HAHAHA the video is really awesome bec ause it portrais SRS as a place where people constructively point out sexism on reddit. In truth SRS is a place for blind insults, gross generalization, where NO discussion can take place. SRS is a place where white middle aged man get banned on sight if they don't agree with the disgusting hate that is portrait. SRS is a sick little place, much worse than any sexism i have ever seen on reddit. Besides that, the ONLY sexist thing that will get upvotes on re…
/r/MensRights07/06/12 07:18 PM
11

I was just about to post the same. The context is clear, the add uses a old stereo type of the cold hardened man slapping the newbie back in to reality. In fact, i think the add is kinda cute. The woman assumes the man has stolen something, but instead of being disgusted or something she takes action, plans there escape and incorporates the husband in it.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:25 PM
4

lol yes
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:26 PM
4

consciousness level if you are conscious enough to talk, its not rape. If you are passed out on the couch and somebody fucks you, than it's clearly rape.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:15 PM
4

Indeed, she wasn't raped. Because fucking somebody when you are drunk is not rape.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 05:01 PM
2

Bad example of sarcasm if i ever saw one.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:02 AM
-1

indeed it is NOT representative. just like democracy it is the best worse system we have at the moment.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:59 AM
-4

That happens IN TRIAL. That happens because the lawyer defending the rapist must do everything in his power to reduce his sentence as much as possible. This is NOT representative of our society. €: thx for pointing out my mistake btvsrcks
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:53 AM
-2

This exactly. I sometimes question my GF about these issues that arise eon reddit and she is always astound at what these people consider rape. Guess she just knows how to take responsibility for her own actions.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:46 AM
1

This story ofc didn't happen. It is impossible to pass judgment on this since so many details are not described and can not be described since this story is fake. Stop arguing about fake problems, stop arguing about story's that make no sense, focus on the real stuff. There is enough bullshit happening we don't have to clutter the MRM frontpage with fake story's.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:39 AM
-1

This is obviously fake. I refuse to believe that there are people this stupid. I simply refuse.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:04 AM
1

In austria we have a similar rule ^ Thou it is most often used by man, while they are still married (but i don't think they stay that way much longer...) Without knowing anything about the case but what the article said i can fully support the woman in the divorce case. The partner not wanting sex for month on end is simply unacceptable, sex is just a very vital part of a relationship. What i don't support is after she got divorced she went back and sued him for money, that is... very insane. Wh…
/r/MensRights19/04/12 06:41 AM
-1

Gonna get down voted but... i think it's funny and he deserved it. Also if the roles where reversed i would support the man in full force. Cheaters are a very special sort of scum and they should be publicly humiliated.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 10:38 PM
0

How am i being hypocritical?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:10 PM
6

Hint: I would gladly give me life for my woman and child to survive. I suspect that played a role in it as well.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 07:58 AM
0

What? I'm not from SRS o_O I'm banned from there actually for having a discussion in SRSDiscussion lol
/r/MensRights15/04/12 12:59 PM
2

Yeah, the movie looks bad, as in not very funny. I don't see any other problems with it, it's just a movie.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 09:01 AM
0

I wouldn't go there for advice, SRS is a silly place. Just use your brain, if you can.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 07:21 AM
-11

Its actually the linked articles subtitle So, we have to copy bullshit just cause it's there? A lot of articles get special names, why is this different? advocated by feminists and they werent advocated by us, then where did they come from? From somewhere else? Are you suggesting that only these 2 groups exist? For me the article reads more like a lot of young adults are becoming smarter, adapting to the unfairness of our law's. then why isnt it safe to assume they also intended the consequences…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:55 PM
-16

May be some kind of justification but one would think a smarter and less provoking thread title.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:46 PM
-19

Terrible thread title, how is this a Feminist triumph? Downvote. About the actual link: Good article, hit's on several topics important to the MRM.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:48 PM
1

Makes sense imho. But the execution is awe full.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 07:17 PM
4

Downvoted. There is no Link to what the OP means and no context what so ever. I have never heard the "media" downplaying male birth control.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 12:49 PM
6

I would like a logical justification to take a % of man's money and give it to the woman instead of a fixed amount.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 10:31 AM
0

Are you loling at your own inability to defend your post? If so, let me join in LOL you fail XD
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:29 PM
1

Bullshit you fuck face. Your hyperbole makes me vomit in my mouth. The more likely scenario is that she calls upon the stereo type of man helping beautiful woman in need. Fixing cars, computers and carrying shit. She just clarifies that not every girl (and her specifically) gets help from men all the time. She makes NO claim that she is entitled NOTHING in her post gives any impression on her work ethics or sense of pride. It is a testimony to the stupidity of a rather large portion of stupid us…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:58 AM
5

I find it admirable that he controls himself so well. If anyone would attack me like that i would fight back in full force, tits or no tits.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:52 AM
1

I'm from planet earth country Austria. Maybe at your place people are more backwards but there is no public shaming for males who do not wish to pay for everything. I wounder at what place you live that there are hoards of feminists ready to pounce at man who do not wish to pick up the entire check. I think what you are doing is hyperbole.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:30 PM
1

So can a man.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:54 PM
1

Naive1000 worte: That's BS women choose to shave their legs. Well, if they don't they get shamed. So if woman shaving there legs is no double standard, then man paying is no double standard. That was my point.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 03:52 PM
1

How is man choosing to pay a double standard?
/r/MensRights07/04/12 06:14 AM
2

Just sue the state for Wrongful Imprisonment Emotional Distress Physical Distress Loss of income Sue the accusatory for the same things and pay the state with state money, job done.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 06:11 AM
10

How is that even possible thou? If you can't EARN that much how can they make you pay it? I mean he has to pay ion the first place because the woman earns less right? So if he earns less he has to pay anyway? How does that make sense? This is screwed up it makes me sick.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:59 AM
31

I honestly can't watch this. It makes me so fucking angry, I can't bare it. It sucks all the enthusiasm that i have for getting children right out of my body. I don't want this to happen to me, but it seems like there is no way to prevent it because the law is just so extremely unfair.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 10:23 PM
5

in very rare and isolated cases, sometimes cause harm to men. LoL? Go and fuck yourself you stupid bitch. Citation needed much? Any "always arrest XXX" policy seems extremely stupid and sexist to me. Would you still be okay with it if you where the one in the unhappy position? Fucking crazy bitch.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 08:03 AM
0

...... I refuse to believe that so much shit can happen to one person. Srsly, if something even remotely to that would happen to me i would become so extremely picky about the woman i spend time with that there could not be "carbon copy" of another relations ship.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 12:39 PM
26

Did I hit a nerve? Yes. There are a lot of adults with girl friends good paying jobs and a full life who still enjoy playing video games. You insulted them all, ofc they are going react bad towards you.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:33 AM
6

She’s learned that her job makes men uneasy. What o_O Wouldn't make me uneasy, why should it? What? Does she really think the man who would freak out about something like that are worth perusing? Very strange indeed.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 12:26 AM
-2

Not really. If you think everybody who bragged about something did it on purpose you have not been around people doing skill sports, EVER. "yeah, i totally meant to do that"
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:27 PM
-2

depends if the dude calls me in the middle of the night in full on stress mode, or if we are having a couple of cold ones CON TEXT can you use it?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:31 PM
9

Police say adults should not offer rides to juveniles they do not know. If they feel a young person is in distress or danger, they should call police. Okay np. A:"Yeah, hi officer. It's cold and raining and there is a young girl/boy in light clothing. He looks as if he doesn't know where to go. Just letting you know, i'm gonna leave now, i'm sure you have nothing better to do than personally investigate every call like this, leaving now trolololol."
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:56 AM
-2

Can we have a little more context than that please? I find it kind of stupid how you all assume that she did it on purpose. If it was an accident i see no problem with this AT ALL. I have made fun of my gf for accident's that happened to hear, even if i was the initiator, it wasn't my intent but shit happens and what is a better way of dealing with it than making a joke? Srsly you guy's, there are REAL issues out there and you focus on a stupid Facebook post where you don't even have enough cont…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:49 AM
0

Wouldn't that be something you would want your lawyer to know? Luckily, I'm just 23 years old dude with a great gf, i don't plan on getting married, ever. So i can't really relate to the horror story's i read i this sub reddit but i wounder how a court would react to a factual statement of expenses. Is it even possible to force your wife to keep book about the money she gets?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:38 PM
0

Is the same on her?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 02:28 PM
-4

Don't wanna be a dick but MY awesome gf does NOT have a problem with taking a paternity test :) probably because i dumped all the other woman and only sticked to the one that wasn't CrAzY
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:17 PM
-1

The bias in the law is a real mans right issue, all the social stuff between him and his gf is his own problem and not a mans right issue. He is stupid for even getting together with her, her flaws must have been visible long before that situation ever occurred.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:43 PM
1

The man in this story is a complete wuzz and the situation he finds himself in is entirely his own fault.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:51 PM
1

He told her specifically where the watch is and that the watch is very very important to him. To say he didn't explain how important it was to him is simply not true. You could argue that he didn't tell her the whole back story so she couldn't understand the importance fully but to say that he didn't explain how important it was is just not true, no amounts of down votes will change that fact ^
/r/MensRights25/11/11 09:19 AM
-3

Unfortunately THAT IS JUST NOT TRUE! in the scene of pulp fiction he makes it very clear that he was indeed very specific to NOT forget his watch, it is good that you learned something, but you didn't understand the movie.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 08:42 PM
-1

Probably not possible with a pig like you.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 07:59 AM
-5

Why would it not happen, in a just cause world, there are no rules.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 07:59 AM
1

No argument is needed. There is no argument needed against racism or nazis.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 07:58 AM
-12

Ih come on fuck yourself in the face with a sledge hammer. "Life isn't fair, DEAL WITH IT" Yeah i want to see you deal with it if tomorrow comes the police and takes away all your stuff "just cause" and leave you to rott in the streets.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 12:10 AM
-10

That is extremely sexist and i don't agree with that at all. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:48 PM
5

That wasn't the point of my post, i just pointed out a double standard. The woman has complete control over the situation and the man has no control at all. That is simply unfair and it needs to be changed. There simply is no good solution to the problem of "man wants to keep it, woman doesn't" but to the other side of the coin "woman wants to keep it, man doesn't" the solution is very easy, just let the man out of it. If the woman wants to keep it she should be capable of doing so without the r…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:45 PM
26

I can't understand how it is legal that a person has to take responsibility for a child if he doesn't want it, while on the other hand it's completely legal for a woman to abort a child if the man wants to keep it. Double standard much?
/r/MensRights15/11/11 08:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter