TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Consilio_et_Animis Archive

View 368 posts and 3,907 comments by Consilio_et_Animis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2349

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/02/20 10:25 AM
1743

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/11/20 06:36 AM
1722

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:47 PM
1573

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:48 AM
1484

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/12/20 08:49 AM
1319

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:28 PM
1189

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/07/16 09:00 PM
1184

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:27 PM
1021

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:08 AM
1018

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/11/18 11:49 PM
921

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:38 AM
908

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/04/20 10:37 PM
699

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/09/17 06:08 PM
622

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:10 AM
611

Consilio_et_Animis/r/PussyPass13/10/16 04:23 PM
574

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:37 PM
531

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/10/16 02:06 PM
521

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/08/15 01:22 AM
491

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/03/21 01:20 AM
474

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/04/16 01:51 AM
462

Activism/SupportConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:40 AM
418

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:52 PM
396

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/03/21 09:36 PM
381

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:30 PM
307

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/10/15 03:58 PM
297

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/03/20 03:06 PM
289

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/09/15 07:09 PM
286

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/04/20 01:42 PM
281

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/03/20 11:51 PM
279

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/05/16 09:25 AM
274

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:37 PM
262

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/03/21 11:06 PM
256

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:20 AM
255

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/10/20 12:38 PM
253

Marriage/ChildrenConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/04/20 12:59 PM
249

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/09/15 12:33 AM
242

Fathers/CustodyConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/09/16 07:59 PM
240

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/08/20 09:57 AM
237

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/01/17 02:16 AM
231

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/08/16 06:48 PM
230

HealthConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/03/21 05:58 PM
226

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:42 PM
222

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:34 PM
218

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/09/17 03:28 PM
217

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:21 PM
211

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/10/17 07:18 AM
207

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:24 PM
201

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:48 PM
199

GeneralConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:18 PM
196

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:30 PM
195

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:51 PM
192

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:27 AM
192

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/03/19 05:08 PM
188

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/09/20 04:45 PM
180

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:07 AM
178

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/09/16 02:18 AM
177

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/07/19 12:52 AM
171

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/09/18 12:52 PM
170

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/09/18 03:57 AM
168

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights29/08/17 04:01 PM
167

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:50 AM
165

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights29/03/18 12:20 AM
164

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:38 AM
161

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:58 PM
160

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/04/16 03:02 AM
155

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/12/16 01:49 PM
151

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:56 AM
150

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/01/17 09:15 PM
146

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights02/04/19 05:28 PM
145

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:05 AM
143

Misleading TitleConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:21 PM
137

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/07/16 12:22 PM
137

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights24/09/13 11:01 PM
137

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:03 PM
130

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:18 PM
128

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/10/15 05:57 PM
125

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/01/20 03:20 PM
125

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/08/15 12:35 AM
124

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/03/18 03:11 PM
124

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:00 AM
121

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/06/16 01:39 PM
120

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:54 PM
118

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/03/16 09:33 AM
115

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights24/12/15 07:32 PM
114

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:22 PM
113

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:25 PM
112

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/12/19 06:59 AM
110

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/05/16 03:27 AM
110

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/09/17 06:53 PM
107

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:06 PM
105

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:07 AM
101

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/05/17 03:12 PM
100

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:28 AM
100

Misleading TitleConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:01 PM
99

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/04/21 01:55 PM
94

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/05/19 02:34 PM
93

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/04/18 11:39 AM
92

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/06/16 06:25 PM
92

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/02/20 11:06 PM
91

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/04/20 04:13 PM
91

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/07/19 04:34 PM
91

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/02/18 02:08 AM
89

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:23 AM
86

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/03/16 09:02 AM
86

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/08/16 07:31 PM
83

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/04/19 09:33 PM
83

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:50 PM
82

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:18 PM
82

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:33 PM
82

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights02/02/16 02:44 AM
81

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights12/06/18 01:28 PM
80

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/11/20 02:04 PM
78

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/10/16 04:14 AM
78

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:00 PM
77

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights31/12/15 03:51 PM
77

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/02/20 01:53 PM
77

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:28 PM
76

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:39 AM
76

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/07/16 01:47 AM
76

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/05/18 03:34 PM
75

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/03/16 07:32 PM
75

Fathers/CustodyConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:06 PM
74

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/09/16 03:18 PM
73

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/09/20 12:10 PM
73

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/06/16 09:34 PM
72

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/08/20 08:46 AM
70

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:18 AM
69

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/02/20 06:53 AM
69

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/02/21 03:23 AM
69

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:42 PM
69

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/04/17 02:12 AM
68

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:00 AM
68

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:49 AM
68

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/07/16 01:26 AM
67

Activism/SupportConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:43 PM
66

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights02/04/18 01:12 AM
66

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:32 AM
65

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/08/19 07:18 PM
65

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights31/03/17 12:35 PM
65

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/03/17 12:20 AM
65

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/10/16 01:48 AM
65

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:14 PM
64

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:30 PM
62

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/02/19 08:40 PM
62

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/04/20 05:44 PM
61

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:31 PM
59

Anti-MRMConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:12 PM
59

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/09/13 12:58 PM
59

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/03/18 10:14 PM
59

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:53 AM
59

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:17 PM
58

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/02/17 04:02 PM
58

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:51 AM
58

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:22 PM
56

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/04/18 12:56 AM
56

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:56 PM
55

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/10/16 03:46 AM
55

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/03/18 01:42 AM
55

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/01/16 09:35 PM
55

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/01/18 12:41 AM
55

GeneralConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:28 PM
54

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:18 AM
54

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:30 PM
53

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/04/17 01:32 PM
52

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:03 AM
51

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:57 AM
51

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:59 PM
50

HumourConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/05/19 12:29 AM
49

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:44 PM
49

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/04/16 06:12 PM
49

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:08 PM
48

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/08/15 11:57 PM
47

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/04/18 11:29 PM
46

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights05/01/18 12:52 AM
46

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:21 PM
45

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/01/16 04:00 PM
44

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:15 PM
44

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:42 PM
44

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:40 PM
44

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/04/19 04:04 PM
44

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/07/19 09:09 PM
44

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/08/16 02:00 AM
44

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:02 PM
43

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/10/17 07:42 PM
43

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/11/18 08:50 PM
43

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:05 PM
43

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/12/20 08:16 PM
42

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:45 PM
41

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/08/16 10:34 AM
41

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/04/20 03:06 PM
41

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights12/12/15 09:17 PM
41

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/07/16 05:15 PM
40

Consilio_et_Animis/r/PussyPass18/12/19 11:09 AM
40

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/09/16 01:21 AM
40

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/08/16 03:04 PM
40

HealthConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:14 PM
39

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/08/20 03:55 PM
39

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/04/16 01:27 AM
39

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/04/17 02:12 PM
39

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:02 PM
39

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/10/16 09:01 PM
39

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/09/16 11:07 PM
38

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/02/21 11:52 PM
38

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/09/20 11:21 AM
38

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights31/07/15 09:29 PM
38

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:24 PM
37

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:34 AM
37

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/09/15 06:10 PM
37

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights24/01/16 06:38 PM
37

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/01/20 06:27 AM
36

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:07 PM
36

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights14/09/15 03:52 PM
35

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/03/17 01:01 AM
35

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/05/19 11:33 PM
35

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/08/15 06:36 PM
34

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MGTOW23/09/20 09:21 PM
34

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/08/18 04:01 PM
34

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights05/04/18 04:08 PM
33

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:23 PM
32

Fathers/CustodyConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:30 AM
32

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:26 PM
32

HealthConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/11/19 10:56 PM
31

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/06/19 06:57 PM
31

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:17 AM
30

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:53 PM
30

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights12/07/19 02:52 PM
30

Marriage/ChildrenConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/11/19 01:02 PM
30

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/10/15 10:21 PM
29

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/05/17 12:43 PM
29

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:20 PM
29

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/09/17 06:28 PM
28

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/02/16 12:02 AM
28

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/05/16 11:11 PM
28

Consilio_et_Animis/r/PussyPass28/06/19 12:25 PM
26

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:02 PM
26

HumourConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/03/20 03:36 PM
26

Activism/SupportConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:35 PM
26

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights31/08/15 12:55 AM
26

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:30 PM
25

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/11/19 07:15 PM
25

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/08/17 02:19 AM
25

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/02/20 11:35 AM
25

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/11/20 05:03 PM
25

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:48 PM
24

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/12/19 10:14 PM
24

HumourConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/04/20 01:43 AM
24

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/07/16 09:26 PM
24

Fathers/CustodyConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:27 AM
24

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:35 PM
24

HealthConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/02/21 07:47 PM
24

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights29/04/17 03:44 AM
24

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:56 PM
24

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:22 AM
24

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/01/16 08:33 PM
24

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/08/15 06:44 PM
23

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/01/16 05:31 PM
23

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights19/05/16 03:41 AM
23

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/04/17 02:48 AM
23

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights29/04/18 01:59 AM
22

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:15 PM
22

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:07 AM
22

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/09/15 05:45 PM
22

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/08/16 10:14 PM
22

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/05/16 01:30 AM
22

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights24/04/16 12:56 AM
21

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:18 PM
21

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/03/20 09:10 PM
21

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:18 PM
21

ProgressConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:38 PM
21

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:12 AM
20

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:28 PM
20

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:07 AM
20

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:04 PM
20

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:31 PM
20

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:27 AM
20

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/01/17 04:44 PM
19

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:42 PM
19

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:20 PM
19

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:24 AM
18

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights26/04/20 12:03 AM
18

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/06/16 01:51 AM
18

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/10/18 01:33 PM
18

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/10/15 11:22 PM
17

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/12/18 07:35 PM
17

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/01/20 08:52 PM
17

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/03/18 01:38 AM
17

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:18 PM
17

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:47 PM
17

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights05/02/16 12:13 AM
17

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/07/18 02:18 PM
17

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/07/16 02:53 PM
16

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/08/16 12:15 AM
16

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:04 PM
16

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/07/16 12:07 AM
16

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:55 AM
16

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:12 AM
15

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/11/17 11:21 AM
15

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/05/16 01:34 AM
15

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/09/17 06:19 PM
15

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights06/02/21 05:49 PM
15

Fathers/CustodyConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/04/16 08:02 PM
15

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/06/16 02:11 AM
15

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/05/16 01:58 AM
15

ProgressConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:55 PM
15

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/06/19 09:02 PM
15

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/09/15 02:46 AM
14

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:05 AM
14

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:07 PM
13

HealthConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:52 PM
13

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:48 PM
12

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/09/15 11:55 PM
12

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:38 PM
12

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:57 AM
12

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:34 AM
12

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/04/16 03:26 AM
12

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights16/04/17 02:04 AM
11

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights14/10/16 07:48 PM
11

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MGTOW29/08/18 04:00 PM
11

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/04/16 01:39 AM
11

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/05/21 08:11 PM
11

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/04/17 01:06 PM
11

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:20 PM
11

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/07/16 11:35 PM
11

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/07/18 11:08 AM
10

Legal RightsConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:52 PM
10

Marriage/ChildrenConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:39 PM
10

Activism/SupportConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:38 PM
9

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:32 AM
9

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:04 AM
9

False AccusationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:33 AM
9

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights10/07/16 01:38 AM
9

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/11/19 10:01 PM
9

ProgressConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/11/17 04:17 AM
9

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/12/15 03:00 AM
8

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights09/09/15 01:01 AM
7

Edu./Occu.Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:54 PM
7

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights30/10/15 01:58 AM
6

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:49 PM
6

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights02/08/16 06:33 PM
6

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/02/20 08:41 AM
5

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:00 AM
5

HumourConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/08/20 01:34 PM
4

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights11/12/15 12:53 AM
4

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights18/06/17 03:11 PM
4

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights14/07/16 05:06 PM
3

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights23/09/16 03:30 AM
3

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/05/16 01:31 AM
3

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/10/16 10:11 PM
3

Misleading TitleConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/05/17 11:42 PM
3

GeneralConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights27/11/18 03:18 PM
2

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights20/10/16 01:09 AM
2

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights31/07/15 07:04 PM
2

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights03/03/16 12:11 AM
2

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/04/16 05:00 PM
1

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MGTOW14/03/18 06:39 PM
1

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/11/19 01:01 PM
1

HealthConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:01 PM
1

DiscriminationConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights07/09/20 06:48 PM
1

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights14/06/16 11:50 PM
1

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights22/01/21 03:10 PM
1

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:55 PM
1

Consilio_et_Animis/r/PussyPass03/06/16 07:03 PM
1

FeminismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:04 PM
0

Social IssuesConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:29 PM
0

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:58 AM
0

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights08/08/15 03:08 AM
0

Consilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:14 PM
0

IntactivismConsilio_et_Animis/r/MensRights28/02/18 02:24 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,907 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yes. But do you understand it now? Never mind that darling, you have been summoned here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/n4lz0n/university_of_sydney_in_australia_has_outright/gwydg0r?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Chop chop!
/r/MensRights04/05/21 10:26 PM
5

Feminist Mathematics — module 3: If in doubt, act as if everyone else is taking you seriously, and attempt to engage them with faux "rational" statistics and arguments. No matter how batty you claim to be; just twist your little girly pigtails and claim that you were just "...trying to help". Book yet another emergency session with your intersectional therapist.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 08:29 PM
5

u/ObviousObservationz you were not summoned; so please don't just materialise unless I say so. Still, as you are here: Feminist Mathematics — module 2: Distort the thrust of an an article in a MSM news source (in this case, the GaGa), because it does not fit your toxic feminist agenda. Get caught-out. Reply by referencing a totally different article, and presenting and arguing a totally different set of feminist mathematics (from the UN 🇺🇳🤪) First off, I'm not a her. I can smell your pussy-mind …
/r/MensRights04/05/21 07:31 PM
9

Paging u/obviousobservationz. Paging u/obviousobservationz. Please comment with your “feminist mathematics”, and explain this to us simple minded men. 🤪
/r/MensRights04/05/21 12:13 PM
2

On brown bread please.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 08:18 AM
5

Avocado on rye please.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 12:17 AM
1

Cheese and pickle please.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 12:17 AM
6

Feminist mathematics: "....millions and millions more girls than boys" = 45%-39% = 6% So currently, there are 6% less girls than boys in secondary education around the world; and not even 50% of boys are in secondary education. Mad Toxic Feminist solution: Spend $15 billion on girls alone.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 12:16 AM
3

Ham and tomato please.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 09:36 PM
10

Oh dear, you again. Typical toxic feminism: immediately distorts the argument, and claims that the post is "against education women..." and that education women is not a "worthy endeavour" LOL 🤡🔫 It's wonderful you post here u/ObviousObservationz, as you are a constant, living proof of how batty feminists can be; and how much you hate boys and men. So go ahead; more drivel please.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 08:45 PM
2

In Jan 2021, they bowed to the mob and launched their new “Equality, diversity and inclusion strategy”. So I guess that maybe finally forced their hand: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-us/cancer-news/press-release/2021-01-29-cancer-research-uk-launches-its-new-equality-diversity-and-inclusion-strategy
/r/MensRights22/04/21 12:22 PM
2

OOOOOOO.... "thrust" er? Triggered! 😂 Micro-agression!
/r/MensRights21/04/21 01:54 PM
23

Excellent advice thank you. Notice how this is one of the occasions, where are you are making it clear you are talking about yourself by using “I“. This is much better than using “you“, which puts the issue on her.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 08:57 AM
13

BBC checklist to decide if this crime should be censored and not be reported: Female criminal — check Ethic minority — check Muslim faith — check False rape accusation — check Male victim — check Conclusion: By order of the Director General and the BBC Head of Diversity and Inclusion, this story is never to appear on any BBC television or radio station, nor on the BBC website. Click here to check the BBC website for her name Of course if it was the other way around, and the victim was a female, …
/r/MensRights21/04/21 01:59 AM
1

I see where you are coming from, but this is most likely due to the UK law, that once a case is being considered by a judge or court, then public discussion can interfere with due process: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub_judice
/r/MensRights19/04/21 08:47 PM
2

Warning: Gaslighting from Toxic Feminists does not work in this subreddit! Your stance is a typical case of gaslighting. Feminists attempt to constantly portray themselves as "victims" because they are unhappy with life, and are too weak and lacking in self-awareness to look inside themselves for the answer. So instead, they look outside, and have constructed the mythical "patriarchy" to blame all their "problems" on. And you, u/ObviousObservationz are a prime example of this. Research has shown…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:16 PM
8

er... This “act” is no more than political posturing and propaganda. It is used to push and reinforce various myths about pay differentials between males and females as the comment above has detailed clearly. Research shows, that in the UK, only 31% of the population correctly understand what the gender pay actually means: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/economy/articles-reports/2018/09/14/most-brits-have-wrong-idea-what-gender-pay-gap Even Time magazine knows this is all a hoax: https://time.com/32…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:15 AM
1

> Research has shown that blood cloths are more common in young women who have had the vaccine. Nope. "...most of the cases reported have occurred in women under 60 years of age". https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-ema-finds-possible-link-very-rare-cases-unusual-blood-clots-low-blood > So it’s not coincidence Nope. "Investigations by EU and UK regulators into reports of unusual blood clots after receiving the Oxford-AstraZeneca covid-19 vaccine have concluded that th…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:53 PM
54

...the vaccines by J&J and AstraZeneca have been fatal for almost only women. There is no evidence at all that the vaccines are “fatal” for anybody. There has only been a tiny number of people who have had blood clots after taking the vaccine. This could easily be a statistical anomaly, as people get blood clots every day.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:51 PM
34

TL;DR: Women are very good at spending other people’s money — husband’s, ex-husband’s or the tax-payer.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 12:56 PM
17

They're also commanded to mutilate their children's genitals so that's not really the best example. All muslim boys are subject to genital mutilation; but not all girls.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 07:32 PM
34

One of the very best arguments against this nonsense, is to point on that in Islam, both women and men are commanded to remove their pubic hair! So by that logic, all muslims are pedophiles. That shuts them up pretty quick. https://raseef22.net/article/1070717-shaving-practices-halal-haram
/r/MensRights29/03/21 04:35 PM
0

And I fell for you when you used the word "epistemology" in relation to "feminism" — and you weren't joking! 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights28/03/21 09:57 PM
1

I think I may be falling in Love! 👩‍❤️‍👨 💕
/r/MensRights28/03/21 09:22 PM
1

Awwww... thank you! Does that mean you are now my bitch? 😍 ...or am I your bitch? 😱
/r/MensRights28/03/21 08:58 PM
1

you can't help but respond with condescension or passive aggression? Who? Little ol' moi? 🤗
/r/MensRights28/03/21 08:06 PM
1

u/LachimolalaSsi is talking about me — but it's OK, we have a love-hate relationship 😎 And she's quite harmless really.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 08:05 PM
0

...cute Love you long-time! 😘
/r/MensRights27/03/21 07:57 PM
2

Does that make you feel better about yourself? Maybe; but this does for sure! 🤪
/r/MensRights27/03/21 04:27 PM
1

Did you get that sophisticated witticism from r/kpopthoughts where you seem to hang-out most of the time 😆 👏 Make 👏 me 👏 a 👏 sandwich 👏
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:16 PM
2

You do realise that if you were to ask women in the UK what they believe is the greater number, the amount of women who die from suicide or homicide, they'd all say suicide? Sure thing honey pie. 🙄
/r/MensRights27/03/21 12:41 PM
3

Hehe still get more pussy than you mate. u/Puginator09 with his pussy
/r/MensRights25/03/21 10:51 PM
3

> incel LOL @ u/Puginator09 You're like 16 years old, and you spend all your time posting to gaming subreddits, and posting Star Wars memes. The first and last time you will ever see female genitalia is when your mother gave birth to you. " I’m 14 going on 15..." https://www.reddit.com/r/Fieldhockey/comments/envwes/starting_out_field_hockey_in_february/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights25/03/21 10:29 PM
1

There are so many great insights into the female mind in this article, it's hard to know where to start ! LOL "Hardly a week goes by without a middle-aged celebrity being photographed with a new and much younger girlfriend". Funny that eh? It's always celebrities isn't it? Those men with power, fame and money. It's never: "Local, overweight truck driver, aged 56, marries young beautiful actress just 22 years old" is it? "I can understand why a leading man (or indeed, woman) would get involved wi…
/r/MGTOW25/03/21 08:14 PM
5

There are so many great insights into the female mind in this article, it's hard to know where to start ! LOL "Hardly a week goes by without a middle-aged celebrity being photographed with a new and much younger girlfriend". Funny that eh? It's always celebrities isn't it? Those men with power, fame and money. It's never: "Local, overweight truck driver, aged 56, marries young beautiful actress just 22 years old" is it? "I can understand why a leading man (or indeed, woman) would get involved wi…
/r/MensRights25/03/21 08:13 PM
7

"I believe there's a whole selection of children body building, my friend sent me a bunch of these pictures". https://www.reddit.com/r/13or30/comments/c9b7lo/face_of_a_boy_body_of_a_man/eswmoi4?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 So u/Luumey collects semi-naked photograph of young children eh? I think I just stick with being an "incel". Nice...
/r/MensRights25/03/21 07:49 PM
1

Never said I was an Aussie I can smell the Vegemite in your nappies from halfway around the world mate.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:50 PM
2

A real Aussie man wouldn’t call me a cunt and then get scaredy-cat and delete it. You must be one of those girly-man Aussies I’ve heard about Disappointed. 🇦🇺🦘
/r/MensRights24/03/21 11:16 AM
2

Oooooooo... hurt me big boy, hurt me! 🤗
/r/MensRights24/03/21 11:13 AM
3

a special kind of cunt Awwww... thanks honey 😘
/r/MensRights24/03/21 10:30 AM
5

Missing a key point there that a good chunk of those women killed themselves because of something a man did TO them Yes, of course, silly me. Women are weak and silly creatures. Whatever happens to women, it’s always men’s fault 🙄
/r/MensRights24/03/21 09:53 AM
3

have the type of day you think you deserve. I think that's the 3rd time you've stated you're going to not "talk to me" anymore 😢 Let's see if you can stick to this now eh? Or are you just a typical woman who always has to have the last word? 🤪
/r/MensRights23/03/21 07:03 PM
3

Based on this post, I doubt you are worth a discussion. Well, you got that bit right... but you're still trying eh? 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights23/03/21 06:18 PM
4

> Aren’t you afraid I’ll accuse of sexual harassment? No, I more worried you'll want to give me a good spanking, seeing how you hang-out at r/bdsm and r/BDSMpersonals LOL! 😈😱 Now be a good girl and run-along to r/TwoXChromosomes and show them on the doll where I hurt you.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 06:10 PM
3

What hurts... What hurts even more... Do you want a hug darling?
/r/MensRights23/03/21 05:19 PM
3

Yes, the truth hurts doesn't it?
/r/MensRights23/03/21 04:54 PM
2

There is a danger you could just be overthinking this. As I said in my original posting, there was a time and place to use this statistic, and you should use it carefully. If you do that, you will OK, and it will hit its mark.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 08:08 AM
2

Again, I get where you are coming from. But using this statistic, is really a last-resort hand-grenade, to just take a swipe at people when they are just being deeply nasty and engaging in man-hating. eg: when someone just dismisses all the men who are murdered by say: "Yes — but it's men who do all the murdering".
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:38 PM
3

I think you make a good point, which is why I urge people to be cautious and judicious in the application of this argument. However, there are times when you are dealing with illogical, angry, and deeply aggressive people, where it is worth bringing out this statistic. It works less as a “logical and reasoned” argument, and more as a blunt cudgel to shut people down who just hate men.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 02:17 PM
6

I think you make a good point, which is why I urge people to be cautious and judicious in the application of this argument. However, there are times when you are dealing with illogical, angry, and deeply aggressive people, where it is worth bringing out this statistic. It works less as a “logical and reasoned” argument, and more as a blunt cudgel to shut people down who just hate men.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 02:16 PM
22

This is all part of the continuing push by feminists to declare men guilty of rape, simply on the basis of accusation. And the first thing they need to do, is to get rid of juries, made-up of ordinary men and women, who just will not convict on the basis of flimsy "evidence". That way, they can pack the court with brainwashed judges, who have been "...trained in the presentation of evidence of vulnerable witnesses." Feminists were not happy when a jury of 9 women and 4 men found Alex Salmond not…
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:29 PM
2

I'm not sure who this feminist "MAIN POLITICAL LEADER" is LOL 😂 I'm afraid you have drunk the feminist Kool-Aid. The are exactly portraying it as a "victory" in order to fool people that it is only hate-crimes against women that will be recorded.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 10:36 PM
9

This is not exactly bad news for men. I'm all for crimes motivated by sex or gender to be possibly classed as "hate crimes". But the feminist lobby had been pushing for only misogyny to be a "hate crime"; but now misandry will be recorded as well. At this stage, they are just going to "record" such "crimes". I'm not sure if there even needs to be a prosecution or conviction for such a "hate crime" to be recorded. They will then look at the recommendations made to the government by the Law Commis…
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:38 PM
1

The police are reporting that the vigil had been infiltrated by black lives matter, ANTIFA, and extinction rebellion. And that’s when all the trouble started.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 04:51 AM
2

You will continually see the media talk about "men" murdering women. This is an attempt to smear all men. You will never hear them talk about "Muslims" murdering people; or "blacks" murdering women.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 10:39 PM
2

That's a good point, I had not thought of that. Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 10:06 PM
2

Why link to this drivel? You make a good point, and I did consider posting an archive link, and I often do. But the downside of doing that, is when someone else in r/MensRights tries to post a link to the original page, it will not show-up as a duplicate. Same goes for if someone posts it anywhere in Reddit, you will not see a link at the top of the page indicating that this "conversation" is going-on elsewhere. And in this case, there are no ads on that page, as it was selected by "open image i…
/r/MensRights15/03/21 09:50 PM
10

The app uses the person's mobile number and last name. Yeah, like such people who have a record, won't use a new mobile number, or just give a false last name to their date LOL!
/r/MensRights15/03/21 09:42 PM
1

Ah yes, silly me. It’s all the fault of white men, because according to you, all black people are helpless simpletons. How to have a successful crime free life: Finish school Don’t get married until you’re 25 Don’t have any kids out of wedlock Don’t do drugs Get a job Don’t commit any crimes If you can, bring your children up in a two-parent household.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 12:45 PM
81

Exactly. And we know it can't be the female Home Secretary, Pritti Patel, nor the female Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Dame Cressida Dick; as of course people murdering other people has nothing to do with them. /s
/r/MensRights15/03/21 12:26 AM
146

So even if you rightly point-out that 99.99999% of men will never murder anyone, let-alone a female, you are still deemed to be a monster. And note how the facial features and body of the man, has many deliberate similarities to a person with Down's Syndrome: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/downsyndrome.html A flattened face, especially the bridge of the nose Almond-shaped eyes that slant up A short neck Small ears A tongue that tends to stick out of the mouth Tiny white spots on the iri…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:41 PM
11

Black men in the UK are just 3% of the population; yet they commit 21% of all murders — mainly, of women (just like men of other races). So that makes a black man seven times more likely to murder a woman, than other men. Would the BBC find this debate title acceptable? "Why are black men such a danger to women?" We all know the answer, don't we...
/r/MensRights14/03/21 10:07 PM
5

There’s even an official name for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_white_woman_syndrome
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:35 PM
12

This is a wonderful, loving article from a friend of the victim. "Spiked" is an excellent opinion website, that so often cuts to the heart of the matter.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:08 AM
2

It’s still not a joke, it’s a deliberately hyperbolic statement to highlight / demonstrate a double standard I must remember that "defence" next time I'm caught making an "inappropriate" joke. LOL
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:56 PM
2

Funny how she is only wheeled out, with a pretty white woman is murdered. What about all the black women that have been murdered? Can anyone name one of them?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:17 AM
17

Ha! The UK were close to enacting legislation that would allow just that defence. And I think that the Biden administration has already reached that stage.
/r/PussyPass12/03/21 01:31 AM
17

Here are some tactics: Ask them: "Do you believe in the Christian notion of 'Jewish deicide', which is the belief that all Jewish people are collectively responsible for the death of Jesus? This was only repudiated by the Pope in 1965 — after nearly 2,000 years. This was one of the reasons the Nazis gave for their genocide against the Jewish people. Do they believe that all Muslims are collectively responsible for 9/11? And all the other terrorist acts committed by Muslims? On January 25th 2021 …
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:59 AM
10

er... OK. So no male police officers on the street after 6pm??? After all, it is (allegedly) a male police officer who murdered this young woman.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 03:51 PM
9

er... OK. So no male police officers on the street after 6pm??? After all, it is (allegedly) a male police officer who murdered this young woman.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 03:50 PM
17

Meanwhile, false-rape allegations are very rarely investigated, and even rarely prosecuted. Indeed, all such potential prosecutions have to be "vetted" by the CCP — Chief Crown Prosecutor — to ensure they are "in the public interest": https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/false-allegations-rape-andor-domestic-abuse-see-guidance-charging-perverting-course And in the past few years, 100% of all prosecutions of false rape accuses have been successful. This means that only the clearest and most seve…
/r/MensRights10/03/21 05:55 PM
41

And note how the police have no concern for any man who might have been wrongly accused by her, or even set-up by the police. Instead, all they care about is the "...negative impact on other victims of rape or sexual assault".
/r/MensRights10/03/21 05:44 PM
3

Thanks for the Gold! 🤗
/r/MensRights28/02/21 05:20 PM
11

"...their rape", "...my rapist" — all creepy stuff from toxic feminists.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 12:28 AM
7

You are exactly right, and I came to just the same conclusion as yourself independently: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lnabht/bbc_claims_its_not_in_the_public_interest_to/go1h1au?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Excellent letters to the BBC, thank you. And of course one only has to compare the story of Grant Townsend’s suicide with that of the female TV presenter Caroline Flack, who was (allegedly) a domestic abuser of her boyfriend, and had been charged accordingly. An…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 07:43 PM
3

Excellent letters to the BBC, thank you. And of course one only has to compare the story of Grant Townsend’s suicide with that of the female TV presenter Caroline Flack, who was (allegedly) a domestic abuser of her boyfriend, and had been charged accordingly. And the police reported that she confessed to the crime: “I did it” she said to the police when they arrived. Yet even a cursory search of the BBC website, throws-up over 30 articles, all of them deeply sympathetic and conciliatory to her “…
/r/MensRights19/02/21 07:39 PM
25

Note that he was a rear Admiral in the Royal Navy; and yet he was paid less. Also, note how the Home Secretary, a female ethnic minority, attempted to block the whole process!
/r/MensRights17/02/21 12:29 PM
1

> How can you kill a positive exchange in one creepy sentence? Ooooooo... Hurt Me! Hurt Me! 😈 🔱 💔
/r/MensRights13/02/21 06:57 PM
2

I stand corrected! ha And secretly, you know you enjoyed it — deep down, you want a man to lead you in life. 😎💪🏾👩‍❤️‍👨
/r/MensRights12/02/21 11:52 PM
3

thanks for the strawman Surely you mean "straw-person" LOL 🤗😘
/r/MensRights12/02/21 10:24 PM
1

A few clarifying questions first if I may: Has this “village” been built by women physically? Did they dig the foundations with their own hands? Did they make the tools from scratch by mining iron ore and smelting it? Did they fashion the roof beams from trees they had logged themselves and transported hundreds or thousands of miles from the nearest forest? Did they build and create a factory to produce bricks? Did they personally lay the millions of bricks by hand that it would take to build th…
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:08 PM
3

Why not have all your teeth extracted at the same time? This will reduce the chances of you experiencing tooth decay, and it will make dental hygiene easier.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 03:22 AM
104

Amazing website And f**k me, you want to read this account of a false rape allegation: https://www.mothersofsons.info/mothers-stories/michelle-jones
/r/MensRights01/02/21 03:07 PM
1

> You should stay away from incels, they will rot your brain. Yeah — good point. Why don't I start with you, get lost incel.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 09:57 PM
5

> Worried about the "Male gaze". Exactly. Translation: "Men used to gaze at me when I was young and hot; now I'm over-the-hill and had two kids, men no longer gaze at my previously attractive young body and face". So I'm going to engage in some mental gymnastics to try and convince myself men are still interested in me.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 09:39 PM
21

"Judge Sarah Munro" LOL. No surprise there then.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 01:33 AM
2

Glitter can, and does cause blindness: https://www.cosmopolitan.com/style-beauty/beauty/news/a56476/woman-loses-eye-from-glitter/
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:40 PM
2

But see how he was “detained” nonetheless? Do you think if it was the case, the father had committed the murder, and the mother was found outside on the front lawn with her head in her hands, that she would’ve been “detained”?
/r/MensRights15/01/21 10:51 AM
6

See how this is described as a “tragedy”? And how the children’s demise is described as “deaths”? If it was the father who had killed the children, then it would be described as a hideous evil act and murder. When women commit such crimes, they are analysed, humanised and sympathised. When men commit such crimes, they are criminalised, demonised and objectified.
/r/MensRights15/01/21 09:57 AM
2

Reading is not one of your strong points is it petal?
/r/MensRights28/12/20 06:09 AM
9

Ah, the old: "women are weak and emotionally unstable" argument. Funny how when it suits them feminists declare that women and "strong, resilient and fighters"; but when that does not work, suddenly women are delicate flowers.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 10:33 PM
12

> ...their constitutional right to privacy violated. er... this is the UK, we don't have a constitution.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 10:30 PM
0

Do you honestly think, that if the paper had concluded that women made better mentors, then all this blow-up would have happened? How many papers are published, that endlessly bash men, that are never questioned in this manner? So many. It's obvious what happened here: This journal get scared by the woke mob, and so they just pull that good old trick of "re-examining" the "data", and then surprise, surprise, finding that it's not up-to-scratch, and so retracting it.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 09:00 PM
2

The problem with punishing false accusers is you risk dissuading real victims from coming forward. er... really? Where is your evidence for this? Can you name any women who was ever prosecuted and found guilty of making a false allegation, who was then subsequently found to be telling the truth? Then compare that "statistic" to the number of men who are prosecuted and found guilty of rape/sexual abuse, where it was subsequently found that the women was lying.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 08:35 PM
18

Meanwhile in the real world, men in 2020 are 21% more likely to be unemployed than women! https://www.statista.com/statistics/280120/monthly-unemployment-rate-in-the-united-kingdom-uk-by-gender/
/r/MensRights15/12/20 02:17 PM
2

Wow! That really is an amazing story, that I had never heard of. Enlightening.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 02:11 PM
2

> That Zuckerberg, you gotta love him. "Over the past year, we've also updated our policies to catch more implicit hate speech, such as ... stereotypes about Jewish people controlling the world..." Says Zuckerberg, a Jewish man, literally trying to control the world! LOL, you couldn't make it up 😁
/r/MensRights04/12/20 11:22 AM
3

Original link here; could be a paywall: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/03/facebook-hate-speech/
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:45 PM
2

Just listen to the narrator’s voice; he is not an alpha male for sure, and has no chance of ever being one. So no wonder he’s trying to persuade men not to go there. He is a soy-boy for sure.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 07:41 AM
207

And here is the “offending” presentation he made. It’s posted on his personal YouTube channel, and is well worth a watch: https://youtu.be/wTHgMxQEoPI
/r/MensRights27/11/20 06:41 AM
21

Next: areas reserve specifically for “people of colour” to stop oppression by “white supremacy”. And you may think I am joking, but on some US university campuses, accommodation is available specifically for “people of colour” if they so wish.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:49 PM
6

Spot on, thank you. And the other word that Laura Bates continually uses, is "grooming". eg: that the "manosphere" is "grooming" impressionable young men. This is a truly evil insinuation, which attempts to associate men learning for themselves and teaching other men; with some sort of sexual abuse etc.
/r/MGTOW30/10/20 09:19 PM
11

Precisely. When women commit such crimes they are psychologised, sympathised, and empathised. When men commit such crimes, they are demonised, pathologised, and criminalised.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 07:14 AM
8

Breaking News: Women making false-rape accusations, can also explain "inconsistencies" and "gaps" in the accuser's memory.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 10:06 PM
6

You missed out this bit: "...and then the case goes to court, and the complainant has to re-tell their story in great detail, and undergo a traumatic cross-examination. But the jury only take 30 minutes to acquit the defendant, because they have just read and seen about too many women lying through their teeth and making false rape and sexual abuse allegations". eg: Mark Pearson who was accused of sexually assaulting a 60 year old women in broad daylight on a station concourse. It was all record…
/r/MensRights20/10/20 03:05 PM
20

Overview of the new guidance is here: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/rape-and-sexual-offences-overview-2020-updated-guidance https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/key-facts-about-how-CPS-prosecutes-allegations-rape It's a real horror-show for those accused, including such gems as if you are employing someone, and have consensual sex with them, then the complainant can withdraw that consent later, on the grounds that they did not have the "freedom" to consent at the time, because their employ…
/r/MensRights19/10/20 12:43 PM
12

“Because older adults, Black persons, and Hispanic persons have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19, engagement in preventive behaviors by these persons is particularly important.” er... males are up to TWICE as likely to die from COVID then females; but they don’t mention that eh? LOL
/r/MensRights10/10/20 09:23 AM
5

continued.. Note that as three of the task force members were women; and the rest men all born before 1980, there is a very high degree of certainty that none of them possess a male foreskin. In addition, at least four of them subscribe to a set of theological beliefs that require them to mutilate the genitals of their infant sons. And one of whom (as detailed previously) did so on his kitchen table. Not only is this in violation of the AAP’s code of bioethics prohibiting physicians from conduct…
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:17 PM
7

Ah yes: the American Academy of Pediatrics LOL 😀 According to the AAP — they are not pro-circumcision. Their wording was very careful — they don't recommend it, but they do justify access to it. And later in the report they state: “...health benefits are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision.” http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/585 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756 And yet Dr. Andrew L. Freedman, one of the senior members of the "task force" o…
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:16 PM
5

If you actually bothered to read the article... Looks like you didn't. From the article: "There have also been calls for hate crime laws to be expanded to include new protected characteristics to tackle hatred such as misogyny..." So no mention of misandry. And from the questionnaire: Consultation Question 12: We invite consultees’ views as to whether sex or gender-based hate crime protection should be limited to women or include both women and men. Well, how about asking if it should just be li…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 11:56 PM
2

Many thanks for that, really excellent work. There is also these sections from the ECHR — European Convention on Human Rights. Note that the UK is a fully signed-up to the ECHR, and this is separate to its membership of the EU, that will cease on 31st Dec 2020: Note that should UK make hatred against Women a crime; but not hatred against Men, then effectively Men's freedom of expression is being restricted, and that is in breach of Article 10 and Article 14. ​ ARTICLE 10 Freedom of expression Ev…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:13 PM
13

> The fact they even have to ask that question should have rung alarm bells. You are spot-on. Thank you. My thoughts exactly. As always, we just need to re-word the question to see the truth: Consultation Question 12: We invite consultees’ views as to whether race or religion-based hate crime protection should be limited to non-Jews or include both non-Jews and Jews.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:42 PM
47

The UK Law Commission are now considering making misogyny a hate crime, but not hatred against men. Can you imagine that in any other circumstances they would be so discriminatory? Imagine they only protected Jews and not Muslims; or they only protected people with brown skin and not black skin. The very fact they would even consider protecting just women not men, shows how deeply toxic feminism has permeated our society. They are still taking the views of members of the public; and you can comp…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:41 AM
27

I watched the first few seconds, and as soon as it started with a man hating I just had to stop. Then I move the slider and stopped a couple of times to see what was there. This is just unmitigated man hating filth. It will make you feel sick just watching it.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 12:23 PM
1

This is the UK, not the USA. In the UK, the age of consent for both males and females is 16 years of age. It’s perfectly legal for anyone, even a 70-year-old, to have sex with a 16-year-old. So the girls he was interacting with were not “underage“. And he could not be charged with a crime relating to the age of the girls he was approaching, because that is not illegal in the UK Note how feminists want to shame heterosexual men, and make them feel “dirty“ for being attracted to healthy young girl…
/r/MensRights20/09/20 09:22 AM
2

This is the UK, not the USA. In the UK, the age of consent for both males and females is 16 years of age. It’s perfectly legal for anyone, even a 70-year-old, to have sex with a 16-year-old. So the girls he was interacting with were not “underage“. Note how feminists want to shame heterosexual men, and make them feel “dirty“ for being attracted to healthy young girls. And isn’t it interesting that not even 50 years ago, his “crime” would have been that he is a Asian man with dark skin, trying to…
/r/MensRights20/09/20 09:20 AM
6

My soggy knees? Misogyny
/r/MensRights19/09/20 05:03 PM
5

> IDK UK law. Can the prosecution appeal this again? Good question. I don't think so. But the toxic-feminists in Scotland are pushing to make my-soggy-knees illegal, but not hatred of men!
/r/MensRights19/09/20 03:50 PM
10

Will he be taken off the register? Yes, for sure.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 12:24 PM
25

And yet five "young" women gave evidence at his trial saying they had been "intimidated". And, he was put on the Sex Offenders Register for 10 years! EDIT: And note how embedded in that BBC article is a BBC video all about how evil this chap is, and how he should be prosecuted. EDI: I just complained to the BBC, and I have also emailed his (female) lawyer to congratulate her, and point out the libel from the BBC.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 12:12 PM
6

Any money she is going to play the "my husband/boyfriend beat me up" card.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 10:02 PM
6

I honestly just don't see why men get married. Why oh why? And I have met TWO female divorce lawyers socially, both of whom told me they also just do not have a clue why men get married. Of course, this now means, that if you enter in to a long-term relationship with a women, you should sign a pre non-nuptial agreement! And just think what sort of "escort" he could have got for that money; and as a famous rock star once said when he was asked why he had paid for a prostitute, when there were so …
/r/MensRights11/09/20 12:20 PM
5

> No. Her party voted for a ban of female circumcision. Exactly. Pure hatred of boys and men.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 11:38 PM
7

> She also says that she is very much against circumcision of male infants, but she fears that jews will flee from Denmark. Is she "very much" against the "circumcision" of female infants, but fears that Somalis will flee from Denmark?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 09:51 PM
8

Their Prime Minister — a womxn — literally wants to mutilate the genitals of infant Jewish and Muslim boys. Who is the anti-semite really?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 08:34 PM
7

UK law specially allows private clubs to restrict membership to just males, or females etc. I can't see how she is going to have a case really: Equality Act 2010 Clubs and other associations for people who share a protected characteristic The Act allows private clubs and other associations (except political parties) to restrict membership to people who share protected characteristics. What has changed? The Act maintains the previous exceptions allowing clubs to restrict their membership accordin…
/r/MensRights08/09/20 10:46 PM
3

That is a really good point. And you were hitting them where it really hurts. UN should be forced to instigate a 50% quota for all women on the Security Council and other major bodies within the UN. Then we will really learn how much they like this “equality”.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 07:08 AM
1

Nice.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 05:34 PM
13

Mad as a hatter, and disgusting how she actually tries to blame her own sons. God help them, they are going to need some proper therapy. But the headline is misleading, these sort of offences rarely get any jail time. She got what is normal in these cases: "Lewis pleaded guilty to failing to provide a specimen for analysis. She was given a 12-month community order with 80 hours of unpaid work and 15 rehabilitation days. She was also disqualified from driving for 12 months and ordered to pay £180…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 05:46 PM
2

Ah — your repressed homosexuality is starting to emerge as anger; but that is a step in the right direction for sure! Want to feel better? Simple — just hit the "downvote" button for this comment. It's what all real gay men do, and we will all love you for it.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 08:42 PM
3

Anyone with a minimal understanding of clinical psychology... Alas, I'm not sure how many of those we are going to find here.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 08:35 PM
1

Many thanks — you are right. Part of my comment above was wrong.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 08:33 PM
0

Hmmm... seems like you are repressing your deep attraction to men. There really is nothing to be ashamed about. It's perfectly normal.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 08:31 PM
-12

hell no I don’t find that girl attractive LOL. OK. You are homosexual. Nothing wrong in that — don't be ashamed!
/r/MensRights01/09/20 07:21 PM
-5

Stop trying to normalize pedophilia you fucking creep. It's actually you who are trying to normalize pedophilia, and make normal, healthy human sexual attraction a crime and immoral. You are a puppet of toxic feminists, who want to criminalise male sexual desire. Sexual attraction, whatever your gender, or the gender the person you are attracted to, is perfectly normal and healthy, once that person reaches sexual maturity. If you call such a person a "pedophile", then you are abusing prepubescen…
/r/MensRights01/09/20 06:59 PM
-24

not only rape. it's pedophilia . Again, I do understand where you are coming from, but I would urge us all here to stick to the legal facts, and not indulge in the lies and hyperbole that the toxic feminists are so prone to. Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. eg: a child who has not yet reached puberty. Only when such a person acts upon their impulse, and engages in sexual activ…
/r/MensRights01/09/20 06:23 PM
5

I do understand where you are coming from, but I would urge us all here to stick to the legal facts, and not indulge in the lies and hyperbole that the toxic feminists are so prone to. She has (allegedly) committed 4 offences under UK law: She, an adult, caused or incited a child under 16 to engage in a sexual act. Sexual communication with a child. Causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activities while in a position of trust. Causing a child to watch a sexual act by a person in a posi…
/r/MensRights01/09/20 06:19 PM
11

Found the child sex-abuser: u/diminished-dave
/r/MensRights01/09/20 05:44 PM
0

I think this is a big step forward for men, and the removal of a long held taboo.
/r/MensRights31/08/20 08:59 AM
5

Agreed. Just look at the Somalian reproduction rate. It’s no different historically to other areas of Africa that do not practice FGM. And Somalia practices the most extreme form of FGM: amputation of the labia lips and infibulation.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 09:12 AM
5

are you also looking for info from both sides of the aisle on female circumcision? how about rape? Thank you. I came here to say exactly this. It's important to start from "first principles" as Elon Musk is always promoting. There is no "debate" about mutilating children's genitals.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 01:34 PM
7

Just kidding! It was her evil cis-hetero-capitalist-patriarchal father. And those "shrubs" either side of the door look a little bit rapey to me... 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights20/08/20 01:36 PM
3

Exactly! Only the very best ones get to qualify.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 04:50 PM
1

That's really great you wish to know more about a subject — and no need to apologise. You can learn all about the subject here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Intactivism/comments/ht3tzv/everyone_deserves_bodily_integrity_genital/ TLDR; cutting off chunks of healthy, functional human genitalia, and throwing them in the bin is evil and a crime against humanity. Think that Female Genital Mutilation is wrong under all circumstances? Do you believe in equality between men and women? Then congratulations, …
/r/MensRights17/08/20 04:46 PM
1

That bright yellow colour is just too much, and detracts from the subject. It just looks stupid. EDIT: I should not say "stupid", apologies. It just looks too garish and overbearing. Does not give the impression of professional and authoritative.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 10:20 AM
16

Can you imagine if “white kids“ were doing better than “black kids“? Would the system automatically give more points to white kids? What if Jewish kids scored better than Muslim kids normally? Would the Jewish kids get more points? Or what if the Protestant kids did better than the Catholic kids? We will know the answer to these questions, except of course when it’s boys doing less well than girls.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 10:18 AM
11

Exactly. Just like the "Gender Equality Paradox". Why it is a "paradox" that the more gender equal a society is, the more the genders revert to their traditional gender roles? Once again, it's because feminism starts with the premise that men and women are identical, rather than using science to find the truth.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 08:00 PM
5

correction, if I may: cisheterocapitalistpatriarchy 👍
/r/MensRights13/08/20 06:56 PM
20

Easy get-out trick: Just claim you are a buddhist, and believe in karma and reincarnation. That way, when they say: "Systemic privilege is the web of unspoken, invisible benefits that come to a person by no virtue of his/her own". You can claim that is religious indoctrination, and religious discrimination. You're welcome!
/r/MensRights13/08/20 06:46 PM
24

I love the way the "researchers" say: "...the results are surprising". Really? Why are you "surprised"? I'll tell you why, because you have started with false premises, such as "Women face discrimination in many realms of politics" — which is what they actually say in the abstract.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 06:24 PM
9

Hmmmm... I guess we'll be waiting a while for a range of woman's underwear for both "circumcised" and "uncircumcised" ladies.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 03:56 PM
2

"My gut reaction is everything..." Yeah, well, that's a surprise! 🤡🔫 https://youtu.be/oxpX6IQ3GY4?t=124
/r/MensRights12/08/20 05:21 PM
14

In the UK, 80% of acid attack victims are Male: https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/5d38c003-c54a-4513-a369-f9eae0d52f91In the UK, 80% of acid attack victims are mail:
/r/MensRights12/08/20 06:32 AM
6

”Although it is also unacceptable when acid violence occurs against men, acid violence is a form of violence that has a disproportionate impact on women” Well, how nice of them to state that spraying acid in a man’s face is also “unacceptable”. And we should be treating people as individuals, not constantly using cultural Marxist ideology to split people up into groups and sow division. If you are the victim of an acid attack, that’s just an awful terrible evil crime no matter your sex or gender…
/r/MensRights12/08/20 06:28 AM
16

And? What is your point? This is a men’s rights forum, and the issue here, is that we constantly hear about “violence against women and children” in the media; to the extent that you would think that men never suffered. Your “but what about the women” comment, is typical of feminist supremacy thinking.
/r/MensRights12/08/20 06:24 AM
3

The amazing thing with all this, is that the very concept of a "woman" has now ceased to exist. Why? Because there is no way to define anymore what a woman is; what makes women different to men. A woman is simply now anyone who identifies as a woman — but that is a tautology, as there is nothing to "identify" with, apart from the word: woman.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 12:03 AM
1

Never heard of that. Very useful. Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/08/20 08:24 AM
16

WARNING: These statistics have not been produced nor approved by the Central Feminist Statistical Manipulation Department (CFSMD). There are 5 factors that comprise "rape statistics": 1. Number of reported alleged rapes per capita. This is increasing every year, due to increased awareness, encouragement to come forwards etc. And, the way crime statistics were collected has changed. And of course the constantly widening goal posts as to what constitutes "rape"; plus the ever-increasing number of …
/r/MensRights09/08/20 10:20 PM
10

So does this mean that they are going to start forcibly “treating” all young black men? Does the higher levels of testosterone found in young black men, explain their much higher rates of incarceration? ”...free testosterone levels were significantly higher in black than in white men...” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4327897/ Oh dear... this is going to start getting a little tricky for the woke mob. 🥳
/r/MensRights09/08/20 11:25 AM
49

And have you noticed that in all the BBC articles about her, the phrase "domestic violence" is not mentioned anywhere? Of course not, because when a women assaults a man then in must be because he "deserved" it, and thus, it can't be domestic violence. Plus: Flack said: "I did it, I whacked him round the head like that...", gesturing a swinging motion with her right hand to police. "I hit him, he was cheating on me" and "I admit I did it, I used the phone". But the female Set Insp Bateman gave e…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/20 04:36 PM
6

And have you noticed that in all the BBC articles about her, the phrase "domestic violence" is not mentioned anywhere? Of course not, because when a women assaults a man then in must be because he "deserved" it, and thus, it can't be domestic violence. Plus: Flack said: "I did it, I whacked him round the head like that...", gesturing a swinging motion with her right hand to police. "I hit him, he was cheating on me" and "I admit I did it, I used the phone". But the female Set Insp Bateman gave e…
/r/MensRights06/08/20 04:35 PM
6

er... let me take a wild guess. It's because men have a bias towards "things", whilst women have a bias towards "nature". That's why there are more women than men in the biological sciences — not that such articles as these even mention that! See here for the truth: https://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/media/Screen%20Shot%202017-02-07%20at%204.18.56%20PM.png
/r/MensRights01/08/20 11:14 PM
7

What is truly shocking of course, is that they have to feel they must specifically mention “men and boys”; because of course we all know that by default these days, everything must be about women.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 10:14 AM
1

I bet their algorithm as really simple: If every other comment is "women are wonderful and men are shit", then they give a high positive score. /s
/r/MensRights01/08/20 01:05 AM
8

The very act of always putting “women and children” together, is a sexist act. Have you ever seen the phrase: “men and children”?
/r/MensRights30/07/20 11:53 AM
1

I honestly think it's hilarious that you consider certain "news" organisations "reputable". You are way, way out of date on that one. For instance, editors themselves are either being fired or resigning from the New York Times, because they will not push their fake-news and ideological agenda; popularly knows as "Wrong Think" (© Mr. George Orwell c/o '1984'). https://www.bariweiss.com/resignation-letter https://deadline.com/2020/06/new-york-times-editorial-page-editor-removed-for-tom-cotton-op-e…
/r/MensRights18/07/20 10:26 PM
1

What if I don't like skiing, and never hang-out in ski lifts? 😏
/r/MensRights18/07/20 10:12 PM
1

That is really wonderful to hear, you are doing something in the real world to help men, thank you. Please can you post a link so we can donate? (If that is allowed by the sub rules?)
/r/MensRights10/07/20 11:45 PM
2

What on earth do all these charities spend that money on? I swear I’m going to set one up myself, and apply for all these funds. And I’m going to pay myself a big wage and have an expense account.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 02:24 PM
12

It’s excellent news to see MGM being discussed widely in that thread. Even though many try and belittle it.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 12:16 PM
9

If you hack off the labia lips of an infant girl, you will halve her chances of getting cancer of the vulva, because half of all cancers of the vulva occur on the labia lips. So MGM and FGM are directly compatible. Happy?
/r/MensRights01/05/20 12:12 PM
27

Oh, OK. So amputating the breast buds of infant girls, just for fun, is OK because when she grows up, she may need a mastectomy due to breast cancer. Got it. Thanks. 👍
/r/MensRights01/05/20 11:36 AM
5

This is real, unadulterated man-hating.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 05:38 PM
42

”Ultimately, the decision is up to every parent, and it's important to respect that person's choice.” No thank you. Anyone who does this to a male child is a filthy genital mutilator, and should go to prison for at least 10 years. “Person” as in not the person the foreskin belongs to. Nope. My Body My Choice.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 01:08 PM
7

I'm done here. Bye Bye!
/r/MensRights30/04/20 11:06 AM
8

Are you aware that I was 4 or 5 when I was diagnosed with it? Of course I’m aware, because I’m a mind reader. What exactly were you diagnosed with? There must’ve been some other complication because you can’t be diagnosed with something that all boys are born with. Now take the intensity of a porn scene, and tell me there isn't a serious risk of a foreskin tear! OK, I’m telling you: “There isn’t a serious risk of a foreskin tear”. Porn scene sex isn’t any more vigourous than the way millions of …
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:53 AM
6

Many thanks for those pertinent facts. It’s clearly “sexual assault”.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:34 AM
8

You have phimosis. Are you aware that all infant males are born with Physiologic Phimosis, where the foreskin is naturally attached to the glans of the penis to protect it and stop urine and faeces entering the meatus? This adherence naturally releases as the child approaches puberty. If you often have sex Yes, and if you eat too much your teeth will fall out 🙄
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:29 AM
66

Oh Wow. That all really jumped-out at me. So true. Thank you for the insight.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/20 10:01 PM
12

So what was sex like when you had a foreskin?
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:42 PM
3

The EU is rife with massive fraud, and for years, their auditors refused to sign their accounts off: https://medium.com/@richardmilton_22731/have-the-eu-accounts-been-signed-off-of-not-81962ab26f8d
/r/MensRights29/04/20 06:01 PM
4

So many frightening things about this. One of them is that they literarily want "trial by our favourite media organisation". So as long as the NYT says Biden is a Good Boy, then he is!
/r/MensRights29/04/20 05:49 PM
0

Yep. You’re a clown. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
/r/MensRights29/04/20 02:43 PM
2

Excellent point, thank you. But I guess it’s like the Death Star, one is trying to find its weakness. And for people such as this woman, her transphobia in supporting male genital mutilation, is a big weak spot. Pointing it out forces her to confront her cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 02:40 PM
3

”Latest NHS England figures show that of the 16,272 people who have died in hospital, 18 per cent are BAME. But they make up only 15 per cent of the general population in England.” And yet figures from China show that men are 2.5 times more likely to die from the virus than women.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:00 AM
2

”Her exact motive was not immediately clear...” Yeah, it’s a total mystery eh? /s
/r/MensRights29/04/20 06:52 AM
5

This is why r/TheRedPill exists. And I think that this woman has just “accidentally” given us a window into many women’s souls. But I don’t hold this against them in anyway, I think it’s purely evolutionary, as women need to find a provider for them and the many children (in the past) they are going to have.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 09:00 AM
3

Good point. I wonder if that has any effect?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:54 PM
4

I don't see an issue with this — it's worth exploring. And hopefully, it will show some positive results. It will also stop the man-hating myths the MSM are writing, that men are dying at double the rate of women, because of toxic masculinity. eg: men smoking, not going to the doctor quick enough etc.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 11:47 PM
4

the worst kind of person imaginable! The worst kind of person imaginable, is someone who thinks that child-rape and sexual abuse is a "questionable" activity.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 08:45 PM
2

Sadly, even MRM wants to impose Western norms on Islam and Judaism. Hmmm... so it's a Jewish "norm" for grown men to do this to little infant boys after they have been mutilated with a knife. The Jewish babies can end-up with herpes, brain damage and even death. https://www.timesofisrael.com/4-ny-babies-get-herpes-from-jewish-circumcision-rite-in-past-6-months/ Do you agree with this as well?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 08:33 PM
2

I can smell it on you, even from thousands of miles away.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 08:29 PM
3

Let me take a wild guess, you’ve never had a BJ for woman even though you’re in your 40s. This whole post is just for you to get sexually excited at the idea that any woman would bother to give you a blow job.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 05:53 PM
5

Thanks. This is just the sort of detailed scientific evidence we need to stop this madness.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:51 PM
1

eh... let me think about this.... So one anecdotal story from an anonymous Redditor, vs The British Journal of Urology. It's a tricky decision eh? 🤡 🔫
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:28 PM
2

The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis? What? I can tell you with 100% certainty that it's not at all. That is scientifically and medically incorrect. Here is research from the British Journal of Urology — a esteemed worldwide medical publication: http://www.circumstitions.com/Docs/sorrellsvsmandj-poster.pdf https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06685.x "Several places on the foreskin are considerably more sensitive than anywhere on the cir…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 01:53 PM
25

It’s a very imprecise question. It should be asking “on average”. And where is the question on the difference in earnings between ethnic minority women and white women?
/r/MensRights27/04/20 09:37 AM
7

Transgender women deserve the very best surgically constructed vagina. And this vagina, is created from the Male genitals. The foreskin is by far the most sensitive part of the penis, and has been likened in some ways to the external glands clitoris of the female. I think it’s vital, and morally correct, that trans-women get the very best surgically created vagina possible.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 09:30 AM
1

Ah yes... thought. I don't think that anyone here is overreacting, or rage baiting. Nor are we stooping low. I'm just sayin... that's it. 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights26/04/20 11:02 PM
6

More info on how the foreskin is vital to gender reassignment surgery here: https://medium.com/@Virginiahallath/a-transgirl-speaks-about-foreskin-53a4f625bb9d https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_reassignment_surgery_(male-to-female)
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:33 PM
1

Interesting, but not persuasive. Just a simple Google, will reveal vast difference in the diseases and infections that different races are susceptible to. And yes, there may be cultural and habitual influences as well. And so what if the difference in death rates between men and women is "just" due to biology? Can you imagine where we would be if it was women that died twice as much as men? All hell would be breaking loose, and there would be multiple "urgent" investigations around the world. An…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:27 PM
9

Latest News! The results are in from the two government enquiries as to why there are proportionally so many more BAME (black, asian & minority ethnic) death victims of the Corona Virus; and why it kills twice as many males as females: Excess BAME deaths: Racism Excess male deaths: Toxic masculinity /s
/r/MensRights26/04/20 05:46 PM
16

Well done who ever did this. But of course the only story in the article from a subject of domestic violence, is of course female.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 09:16 AM
11

Don't know who the guy is, but he needs to stand-up for himself.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 11:45 PM
18

As you say, you need large numbers of people to work the land in "traditional" agriculture. So that means no more abortions, and no more contraception. There — sorted! LOL.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 01:04 PM
10

Meanwhile, WHO promote male genital mutilation throughout the world at every opportunity.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:41 AM
1

And guess who would would be sweeping the streets, to clear up all the mess from the fruit and the bird droppings?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:12 AM
2

As Richard Dawkins said of this type of nonsense from feminists: it’s “Daffy nonsense”.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 11:00 AM
-10

Taking one look at her, he’s most probably glad to be away from her.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:53 AM
3

Wow. That’s the Huffington Post having a go at Jess Phillips for slagging off men’s rights! There is a God.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:39 PM
1

It’s a wonderful and pure example of hypergamy. This young woman is literally displaying the availability of her sexuality to powerful rich successful men.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 12:09 PM
15

Now it’s a fact that black and Asian people are far more likely to die from COVID-19. So will they now start to automatically give an extra point to black and Asian people? LOL, sure they will.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 12:07 PM
3

Exactly. The man that killed her was diagnosed as deeply mentally ill, but of course no pussy pass for him. And he was only 19. ”Todd has been diagnosed with a sexual sadism disorder, which Justice David Beach said was a “potent” indicator of a person’s likelihood of reoffending. There is no known effective treatment for the disorder.” But what about her? Doesn’t she have the exact same “disorder”? Isn’t she going to reoffend?
/r/MensRights18/04/20 10:13 AM
21

And I think in addition to the misanthropy, there is a big element of racism here. The victim was a young man from India who had come to Australia to study. And note, the defence have said the killer should get four years of youth custody!
/r/MensRights17/04/20 02:41 PM
19

You are so spot on. Thank you. You can clearly see the totally different ways these crimes have been approached — simply because one is male and the other female.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 02:37 PM
29

God. Can you imagine what it would’ve been like if the genders were reversed? As always, women are psychologised, sympathised and analysed. Whilst men are criminalised, demonised and vilified.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 11:26 AM
218

God. Can you imagine what it would’ve been like if the genders were reversed. As always, women are psychologised, sympathised and analysed. Whilst men are criminalised, demonised and vilified.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 11:22 AM
4

I thought this is true for a long time. It’s the woman who gets pregnant not the man, and therefore it’s her responsibility 100%. Especially as she can easily use protection all get an abortion. The man is no more responsible for the woman’s pregnancy, then someone is who sells you some car tyres, and a drunken driver crashes into you on the road. The person who sold you the tires is not responsible in any way.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 07:44 AM
5

Amazing man. Beautiful.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:15 PM
1

Good point. No I don't.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 07:04 PM
35

That's a good point — I had not thought of that angle. I suppose one could argue she is at least being consistently incorrect and wrong 😏
/r/MensRights15/04/20 10:59 PM
13

If it was rape, why didn't her date call the police? Ha! Good point. Well done. And she was "having fun" whilst "dating" a young Israeli man. Translation: she was drunkenly shagging an endless stream of drunken blokes from all over the world, which is the whole point of why young people go on these "holidays".
/r/MensRights15/04/20 05:25 PM
16

'"Do you honestly think I would want to have sex with 12 men?” she asked me.' er... why not? Apparently it's the "in thing" with kids these days, and even Teen Vogue are pushing the wonders of group sex, orgies, anal sex, analingus, and dildos. Note: Teen Vogue's target market is 13 to 19 year old teenage girls. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/sex-education-broad-city-tv-sex-scenes-embrace-reality https://www.teenvogue.com/story/anal-sex-what-you-need-to-know
/r/MensRights15/04/20 04:32 PM
6

Notice how that with the original Buzzfeed video anybody can watch it. But to watch the rebuttal video you have to sign in and be over 16. Conclusion: the original one is for children and the rebuttal is for adults.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 11:58 AM
3

Females are actually allocated -1 point. Because the lower points you have the more likely you are to be treated.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 03:03 AM
3

You are welcome. No need to credit me. Here is some of the data on how MGM damages women's sexual response: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 And the great Jewish sage Moses Maimonides, was clear that the strongest reason for MGM was to damage women's sexual response. And he was right! http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/maimonides/ "The Sages, may their memory be blessed, have explicitly stated: It is hard for a woman with whom an uncircumcised man has had sexual intercourse to sepa…
/r/MensRights13/04/20 04:27 PM
3

Spot on. And the OP is right, I now describe it as "...little girls and boys having their genitals mutilated legally in the west". That always stumps them. And the other one is: "...of course you know that male genital mutilation is highly damaging to female sexual response?" Then explain the gliding motion of the foreskin etc. Even better: "Male genital mutilation is effectively female genital mutilation as well, as the female vaginal canal and the male penis evolved as one organ".
/r/MensRights13/04/20 03:06 PM
11

Note that when a male transitions to female, and has an operation to construct female genitalia, the foreskin is extremely useful to the surgeons, and helps form a vagina canal. So it could be said, male genital mutilation is transphobia.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:03 AM
8

It’s heartening to see, that over at r/science, there is overwhelming support for this paper and opposition to male genital mutilation: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/g04hsh/what_is_the_best_age_to_circumcise_we_conclude/?ref=share&ref_source=link
/r/MensRights13/04/20 03:55 AM
10

Note, that in the UK, it’s illegal to have such a body modification for no medical reason, when you are an adult. But if you are a little baby boy, then you could have your penis mutilated for no reason whatsoever.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 03:32 AM
3

Why not do some research, and see if black men are more likely to kill people on the roads then white men? Perfectly reasonable research, because different races have different levels of testosterone. LOL. That will never happen.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:50 AM
5

To be fair, you would have to look at the criminal records of these two people. If the man has previous convictions for instance always on probation or has a suspended sentence hanging over him, and that could explain the extra long sentence. But apart from that, it could just be the good old pussy pass.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 12:38 PM
6

“crossing the line” = Rape
/r/MensRights11/04/20 10:02 AM
1

Pedophile: a person who is sexually attracted to children. That is the strict, medical definition. And by children, you mean males and females who have not reached puberty. But in common, every day usage, it is now being applied to mainly men, when they are attracted to young girls who are post-pubescent, but according to the law are still "children". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Misuse_of_medical_terminology A quick Google search, will throw-up numerous media articles about men havi…
/r/MensRights10/04/20 02:50 PM
0

Because they don't know if she is guilty. Ha ha ha. You really are a dope. Just Google almost any case where a man has killed a baby/child/woman/wife, and the media are straight in with how evil and obviously guilty he is. but if the mother dies, then the baby doesn't get justice. Congratulations, you have been awarded a GOLD MEDAL in the Feminist Mental Gymnastics category. I would hope that this sub is also about facts and logic and not about making wild assumptions. Check Google. When it's me…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 05:23 PM
1

Dude, stop being so deliberate obtuse. The problem is you are a bit dense. I'll make it easy for you: The article only mentions how "desperate" the police are to find the mother as they are concerned about her "health and wellbeing". Fair enough. But no mention of that she has possibly committed a serious criminal offence, and could have just dumped the baby because she couldn't be bothered to care for it — and that happens the whole time. If it was a man who had left the baby, there would be no…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 04:29 PM
2

And I would also like to see data on the subject matter of the research, comparing males and females. And also the citation ranking of those publications. The more citations a publication has, the valid and interesting it is considered to be.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 01:33 PM
9

Why do all posts here just make fun of woman instead of talking about mens rights? Because one of our “rights” is to make fun of women as we wish. Of course, you’ll never see women or society making fun of men. Oh no, never.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 01:30 PM
-2

a woman recently gave birth and may need medical attention. But the man doesn’t need mental health “attention”, because he is, de facto, an evil baby murder? See how your mind is (or maybe not) working? See how society has trained you to always see women as the victim?
/r/MensRights09/04/20 01:25 PM
5

It could have been the father who abandoned and/or killed the baby. Pull the other leg, it’s got bells on it. But let’s imagine for a minute that you’re right, and it was the father, and it was all caught on CCTV. Do you think the headlines would be that the police are worried about the mental health of the father? Sure, LOL. The media would be all about how evil men are and they’re all murderers. It’s always the same old story: when women commit a crime they are psychologised, analysed and symp…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 09:54 AM
43

allegedly physical with her Really? Why do even believe a word she says? And she doesn’t detail the “physical attack” at all. 99% sure that is just made-up bullshit to help her run around her hamster wheel of justification for dumping him. I mean she dumped her first husband at the drop of a hat, so why not again?
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:21 PM
7

For an ex-Russian oligarch, only having $70 million left is the same as: ”All my money has run out.” 😂😂
/r/MensRights08/04/20 04:17 PM
34

Honestly, f**k me. You could not make it up. As always, just reverse the genders: imagine the dog had raped an infant girl, then anyone even enquiring about adopting the dog would’ve been labelled a pedo.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 01:05 PM
22

Note how everyone just refers to the foreskin and sexual pleasure; but the foreskin has many other functions and properties, maybe many we don’t yet know about.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 12:56 PM
6

Totally agree. Their whole “arguement” is moot — and insane.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 12:55 PM
1

Some good comes out of all this, namely that it is a clear window into the evil an insane souls of feminists such as her. These people really are psychopathic and delusional in their thinking. Now you can see how convincing women can be when making false rape allegations; they’re not really lying as such in the common sense meaning of the word, rather they have morphed their mind in to another being. And we have most likely all seen this in our own lives. On many occasions I have received texts …
/r/MensRights08/04/20 10:15 AM
2

Some good comes out of all this, namely that it is a clear window into the evil an insane souls of feminists such as her. These people really are psychopathic and delusional in their thinking. Now you can see how convincing women can be when making false rape allegations; they’re not really lying as such in the common sense meaning of the word, rather they have morphed their mind in to another being. And we have most likely all seen this in our own lives. On many occasions I have received texts …
/r/MensRights08/04/20 05:13 AM
2

How's this a mens rights issue? It’s a men’s rights issue, because it’s so clearly shows the difference in how society views men and women. If three women were dying to every man, you can be assured that that would be the main thrust of most of the articles in the mainstream media, and comments on social media. But because it’s only “men” that are dying in such great numbers, the gender disparity is pretty much ignored. And when it is brought up it’s only in the context of: “men deserve it, beca…
/r/MensRights08/04/20 12:18 AM
49

More significantly, is that according to the transcript, Amber Heard was on a regular dose of the anti-psychotic medicine Seroquel.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 11:05 PM
14

Can you imagine for one tiny moment that the genders were reversed? The mainstream media and social media would be screaming: “gendered violence against women“, “the Femcide virus“, “the women killer virus“, “the patriarchy virus” etc etc We would never hear the end of it, and this would be the whole thrust of the coverage. Then it would move on to “it’s all because men hate women”, and that we need women to rule the world, and then this won’t happen any more.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 11:51 AM
2

And of course if women are imprisoned, they get to go to a nice cushy "country club" prison where they can all wear their own make-up, and they get early release because <reasons>.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:50 PM
8

And remember, that one of the main "punishments" that you get as a teacher if you have a "sexual relationship" with a student, is being hated and ostracised by society. But that only applies to men of course.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:43 PM
2

Hmmmmm... the article's authors are a "Victoria" and a "Kristan" — female eh? Where's the "diversity". And of course no bias. LOL.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:41 PM
5

I would not say he was an antisemite, but he WAS 100% against religious Jews. er... OK then. So you admit that you can be 100% against male genital mutilation ("circumcision"), but that does not automatically make you an anti-semite. And male genital mutilation is performed by the vast majority of Jews, not just what you identify as "religious" Jews. And tell me, what is it that makes Jewish Women so useless (in your eyes) that they are incapable of producing a perfect little Jewish boy? What is…
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:18 AM
8

“Unwanted sex” = Rape
/r/MensRights04/04/20 07:21 AM
7

Ha! Theodor Herzl, the founding father of Israel — the home of the Jewish people — refused (along with his wife) to circumcise (mutilate) the penis of his infant son, Hans. This is because he rightly saw that circumcision was a grievous assault against a child, and was barbaric. He said it had no future in lives of Jewish people. No doubt you think that Theodor Herzl is an "anti-semite" and "Jew-Hater" and you want him dug-up and shipped back to Austria. LOL.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 01:13 AM
5

While you may see it as cruel LOL. Taking a knife to the most sensitive part of an infant boys penis and cutting it off is not "cruel". Pedo Genital Mutilator at work for sure.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:29 PM
5

I only wrote that in brackets to highlight the fact that babies can’t give consent Oh yeah, that's right, I forgot. Babies can't consent to have chunks of their body hacked-off by Pedo Genital Mutilators. Ears, noses, toes, foreskin. Same thing. Silly Me!
/r/MensRights03/04/20 04:14 PM
6

Actually reading the drivel you write, is quite amusing. E.g.: I love the way you put “give consent” in brackets. Says a lot about your mental state.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 11:43 AM
10

type 4 is other harmful procedures such as pricking, piercing er... so pricking a girls genitals with a pin — a crime of genital mutilation in most countries — “interferes massively with natural functions of the female anatomy”; whilst hacking-off chunks of a little boy’s penis causes no problems at all and can be performed just for fun. You are truly deluded, and you are what is known as a “pedo genital mutilator” who approves of, and pushes, the genital mutilation of little boys and girls.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:56 AM
3

LOL. You are a silly muppet aren’t you? “While the World Health Organization did advise against the overuse of travel restrictions.” Translation: they were against banning international travel. And this is the same WHO, who in mid January were still claiming that the virus wasn’t transmittable between humans. They tweeted that out. And when Trump did instigate the travel ban from China, the media screamed that he was a “racist”, and no doubt plonkers like you were wetting your panties. The WHO a…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 06:29 AM
2

Notice how they don't compare how much less "Black women and Latinas" earn than white women.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 10:05 PM
5

Trump imposed a travel ban on people from China, or who had been in China in the past 14 days, at the end of January. And when he did that, Muppets like you were wailing that he was a “raaaaaaaccccciiiiisssstttttt”.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 09:50 AM
3

As of today, there have been 8,464 coronavirus deaths in Spain. I think it's safe to say that coronavirus kills more than machismo. And 3 out of 4 of those deaths will be men. Kinda like “gendered violence” against men.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 09:47 AM
139

And close to 3 out of 4 coronavirus deaths are male. So, kinda mass-murder really.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 12:13 AM
5

Well you are basically dealing with a bodily excretion. So you can add toilet paper & facial tissues? For all genders. <insert humorous masturbation joke here>
/r/MensRights28/03/20 10:06 PM
8

False rape Accusations are few and far between, ranging from 6-8%. LOL. So 1 in every 12 rape accusations are false, but that's "few and far between". Stick to "feminism" and don't try maths or statistics.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 06:09 PM
14

But why would a woman ever lie about being raped? /s
/r/MensRights26/03/20 02:34 PM
1

Why is it the less attractive a woman is, the more radical her Feminism is? It's because they literally have higher levels of testosterone than the average women, and so appear more masculine. Which of course they are: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/full
/r/MensRights25/03/20 09:19 PM
6

Exactly. And it’s not even just “skin”, it’s a highly sensitive mucus membrane on one side, just like the inside of your eyelid, or the inside of the vaginal canal.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:17 PM
11

Can you imagine what would happen if the genders were reversed and this virus was killing twice or three times as many women as men. The howling wouldn’t stop, and it would all be blamed on white men.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 07:37 AM
28

”...but the emails were authored under fake names, and it was thus extremely exhausting for them to prove their innocence.” Oh well. If only we had something called “innocent until proven guilty” you wouldn’t of had to go to all that bother. ”The email accusations were incredible from the start, but the university insisted on proceeding as if they were real—indeed, the university felt obligated under federal law to take the matter seriously.” Yes, it’s a little thing called “Believe every woman”…
/r/MensRights24/03/20 03:36 AM
3

And it was proved in court, that many of them were in contact with each other — and this was directly against the order of the court. Hmmmm... I wonder what they were discussing with each other? The weather? Where to get their nails done? /s
/r/MensRights23/03/20 10:21 PM
25

He was very very lucky that he was charged in Scotland. Because under Scottish law, you must have corroboration — you can’t find someone guilty just on someone else’s word alone. The toxic feminists in Scotland tried to get this changed a while ago, so that a simple false accusation could put a man in jail. At the Scottish legal establishment resisted it. Just watch now, as feminists around the world will be howling for the law in Scotland to be changed. The BBC website will have a piece all abo…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 05:38 PM
13

Exactly. And here’s the proof: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-51583358 Clarke and her children died when her estranged husband Rowan Baxter set their car on fire. He also died. In comments to the media on Thursday, Det Insp Mark Thompson had said it could be a case of a man "being driven too far by issues that he's suffered". The remarks caused fury in Australia.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 02:06 PM
12

And it’s always the same old story: Female purveyors of violence are psychologised, medicalised and sympathised. Male purveyors of violence are criminalised, demonised and vilified
/r/MensRights23/03/20 12:57 PM
5

This is the literal truth. If it had been a dog that had been killed, it would get more coverage than if a man being killed
/r/MensRights23/03/20 10:33 AM
80

Note how the BBC title it: "...killed by stranger in park". Not "women". And of course you just know what's coming: "...the women has some history of mental illness". This is about all you will hear about this killing — because it was perpetrated by a woman and not a man.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 11:53 PM
6

”...but the emails were authored under fake names, and it was thus extremely exhausting for them to prove their innocence.” Oh well. If only we had something called “innocent until proven guilty” you wouldn’t of had to go to all that bother. ”The email accusations were incredible from the start, but the university insisted on proceeding as if they were real—indeed, the university felt obligated under federal law to take the matter seriously.” Yes, it’s a little thing called “Believe every woman”…
/r/MensRights22/03/20 07:34 AM
13

It’s not a “double standard”, or hypocrisy. They are delusional in that they really think that violence against men it’s funny, and is in no way comparable to violence against women, which de facto is always much much much worse.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 07:22 AM
0

And note how she’s already been shown to be a proven liar in court: she was found with the lubricant sachets in her clothing.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 06:17 PM
2

”He describing as nonsense various “rape myths”, including an idea that woman regularly make up rape allegations for no reasons.” Well, that is pretty much a myth. Most of the time they make up allegations, they do have “reasons”. Such as: I don’t want to seem like I’m a slut, I don’t want to be caught cheating on my boyfriend, my mother caught me watching pornography, I need some rape compensation from the government et cetera et cetera. But yes, very occasionally they will just make up rape al…
/r/MensRights21/03/20 06:15 PM
1

"The accusations were lies. But could be prove it?" DOH! er... Innocent until proven guilty. The accuser needs to provide the proof. Chickens coming home to roost.... etc etc.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 05:53 PM
3

"White people are better than black people" "Christians are better than Jews" Get the picture?
/r/MensRights20/03/20 05:47 PM
15

Are you sure they are not saying that the boy is abusing the girl by not answering her messages??? LOL 🤪
/r/MensRights20/03/20 05:44 PM
1

Purely as a physical illness, the coronavirus appears to affect women less severely. “...less severely” is Toxic Feminism speak for ”...for every 2 females that will die, 3 males will die”
/r/MensRights19/03/20 05:35 PM
2

Well, what is he doing there? They are not stopping immigration they are stopping anybody entering the country. Transport minister should be there.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 12:53 PM
-2

Take a quick look at that video, it’s hilarious. The New Zealand prime minister is a fairly pretty and weak looking person. Notice how in order to stamp her authority she ensures there is a big tall hairy macho man standing behind her at all times! And he says nothing he just looks at her approvingly. LOL you couldn’t make it up.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 11:30 AM
3

Many thanks for that great scientific post, that clearly explains the role of testosterone in leadership.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 11:03 AM
1

Lovely. Plus so many of these spaces are going to go bust now as everyone is working from home.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 08:47 AM
4

This is what low testosterone looks like.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 08:39 AM
9

They literally want to shutdown democracy.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 09:35 AM
3

You can tell by the looks on their faces, they don't have a clue. Not only that, they can't even fake having a clue, which is a basic requisite for any good leader. But don't worry — they have their sign language interpreter on hand to give them advice! This is what low testosterone looks like.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:03 PM
8

No mention of how for every 3 men that will die from the virus, only 2 women will die.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 03:38 PM
4

TIL I’m a White Male “Settler” LOL 😂 Well I do hope that no “indigenous” people are going to “culturally appropriate” my white, western music and instruments.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:07 PM
19

I agree with most of what you say. But we are fighting a practical fight, and women such as her are our allies.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 06:31 PM
25

That's just a daft statement. A woman's few is SO helpful, as it's super-powerful for her to show how attractive foreskin is. That will shut down so many pro-mutilation men.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 05:30 PM
61

This is a totally amazing video. So well done, and I am so thankful to this woman. Everyone here should keep a link to this video, ready to post where people show they have no understanding of the foreskin.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 12:54 PM
6

God I hate the BBC. I pray for the day we have BBCexit — when they get defunded and the "licence" fee is scrapped.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 05:10 PM
2

1.1. Employ a female director and a female writer!
/r/MensRights10/03/20 08:45 PM
21

I can't bring myself to "thank" a mother for "bravely" deciding not to mutilate her son's penis for no reason. What does she want? A cookie? But it's progress at least. Even though she still spreads the evil lie that the foreskin is "...just a piece of skin". And remember, that the genital mutilators use a sneaky and dirty argument: Namely that it's a "difficult decision" and parents must be allow to "make their own minds up". NO. It's child mutilation, rape and abuse.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:51 PM
1

I'm just waiting for some courageous man (or woman) to take their employer to court of discrimination such as this. In the UK, you certainly would have a case on a number of grounds.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:40 PM
7

Indeed. And he plead guilty — to the charge of "unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor". The girl was 13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski#Sexual_abuse_case So I don't think the 100 French female lawyers have chosen the best person to use to demonstrate the "innocent until proven guilty" truth. But still, it's progress.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 11:09 PM
8

ALERT: u/zajacdan has referenced an article with opinions from "Brian J. Morris". Oh dear oh dear oh dear. "Brian J. Morris" eh? Now this wouldn't be the same "Brian J. Morris" that use to promote "The Gilgal Society" —a circumcision fetish website — would it? The same "Brian J. Morris" who was mates with a chap called "Vernon Quaintance" who used to run The Gilgal Society, and was working with Brian J. Morris on a pro-circumcision "leaflet"? That was of course before Vernon was arrest and jaile…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 08:08 PM
3

Note that when women make up 70% of a certain group, in this case front line health workers, then it’s wrong and a burden on women. But when men make up 70% of a certain employment group, then that’s evil and a sign of misogyny.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 08:06 AM
1

And yet men are far more likely to die from the virus than women: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/
/r/MensRights09/03/20 08:05 AM
3

Exactly. He's the same twat who said that terrorism is just "...part and parcel of living in a great global city".
/r/MensRights08/03/20 10:57 PM
27

Exactly. 10% isn’t “rare”.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 02:05 PM
22

I tell every cabdriver I travel with to get a camera covering the inside of the car and recording sound. And almost every cabdriver I speak to, has some story of a woman accusing him of sexual assault or suchlike.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 02:05 PM
6

Well, aren't you able to get operations like a labiaplasty and a "hoodectomy" as an adult woman in the UK? Excellent point. And the answer is they are illegal, unless done for genuine medical reasons, including both physical and mental health, and such reasons are diagnosed by a doctor who then prescribes the operation. But of course, the Pussy Pass comes out, and women have labiaplasties and hoodectomies done the whole time with no prosecutions. Indeed, there was a TV program that featured labi…
/r/MensRights07/03/20 05:16 PM
28

The law in the UK says as an adult you can’t even request such mutilation as that is illegal. Yet you can mutilate a little boys penis with impunity.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 12:07 PM
7

”You must unlearn what you have learned.” — Yoda
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:58 PM
6

Sick. And of course she avoids jail, because that would hurt the very children she was abusing in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:46 PM
52

I really don't get why women find it so difficult to be empathetic and helpful during a man's tough time. Because women have no respect for men they consider weak or ill. They give the illusion of being caring and loving, but once they see a chink in your armour they lose attraction for you, and start looking for another man. Take a close read of r/TheRedPill — there it will all be explained to you in detail.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:42 PM
1

Chrome Browser in Incognito mode did the trick. Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 03:02 PM
2

It’s not an interesting article if it’s behind a pay wall and I can’t read it.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 01:09 PM
2

Such discriminatory offers have been proved to be illegal in court. eg: Dr Thomas Bower sued BrewDog for sex discrimination (and was awarded £1,000.00) after a bartender refused to sell him a drink because of his gender: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/brewdog-man-sues-court-case-pink-ipa-beer-for-girls-gender-pay-gap-a8963521.html
/r/MensRights04/03/20 10:31 PM
10

awaiting trial for assault charges against her boyfriend. ... awaiting trial for domestic violence assault charges against her boyfriend. Not that you will see the BBC or any of the MSM using that phrase domestice violence in relation to this case.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 04:11 PM
58

When she is sentenced after showing her Pussy Pass to the judge, you will, under UK law, be able to request her sentence to be reviewed. And the judges statement that he is clearly being sexist, will be a big help.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 03:09 PM
10

At least the comments section is trying to put things right: https://www.algemeiner.com/2020/03/01/anti-circumcision-activists-flood-new-york-times-comments-section/
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:44 PM
10

Original link here, complete with "arty" photographs of the mutilator hard at work: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/nyregion/circumcision-bris-mohels-women.html This article is so full of utter evil filth, it's hard to know where to start. God help all these infant boys she is raping, mutilating and sexually abusing.
/r/MensRights01/03/20 06:35 PM
77

He needs to drop the kids off at the pool.
/r/PussyPass01/03/20 05:48 PM
5

They are seriously trying to push the crazy false statistic that 1 in 5 women are raped at college. That's a greater rate of rape then in the Congo civil wars.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 11:08 PM
238

Nothing like a female feminist woke multi-millionaire crooner moaning about how "oppressed" she is LOL. Where's Ricky Gervais when you need him?
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:35 PM
4

If you re-post your request and change "circumcision" to "male genital mutilation" I will complete your survey. If you don't, I will assume, correctly, that you are a pro infant genital mutilation troll.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:25 PM
14

Mutilation of someone's genitals without their consent is wrong. Thanks for a legitimate, unbiased, non-angry answer What's really scary about your reply, is that you needed someone to tell you that mutilating infant children's genitals is evil, and you couldn't figure that out for yourself.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:22 PM
14

Or even more money than men. At Wimbledon tennis women are paid the same prize-money as men. But as they only play three sets rather than the five sets that men have to, they have much more time to play doubles and mixed doubles et cetera. So per hour, they make much more.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/20 10:43 AM
4

Behind a pay wall. Unreadable.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 10:37 AM
9

Just google the many murders by Australian mothers of their children. There are always endless excuses and “reasons” as to why they did it.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 09:00 AM
5

British Medical Journal, 2019: “Vegan and Plant-Based Diets Worsen Brain Health” https://neurosciencenews.com/vegan-diet-brain-health-14845/
/r/MensRights24/02/20 08:47 AM
9

Note how vegetarianism and veganism is correlated with eating disorders; and almost exclusively in women: https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/members/faculties/eating-disorders/vegan-patients-eating-disorders-mar19.pdf?sfvrsn=be96d428_2
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:33 AM
12

Will do — you’re right.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:30 AM
22

Note how anti-vaccination women far, far outweigh men by a factor of at least 3:1. https://www.sciencealert.com/anti-vaxxer-facebook-dominated-by-women-and-conspiracy-theories
/r/MensRights23/02/20 07:46 AM
10

Excellent point. Thank you. Women often use various eating strategies in order to try and control their lives, I’ve seen it myself many times.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 07:14 AM
20

This article is so full of disparaging men, that it’s hard to know where to start. It just assumes that veganism is good and eating meat is bad. And therefore if you are vegan you’re good and if you are a meat eater you are bad. Where does it discuss the possibility that women are weak, and just jump on the latest social bandwagon without any thought? Where is the discussion that we evolved to the point we have done because we eat meat? Where is the discussion of the evidence, that eating meat i…
/r/MensRights23/02/20 06:56 AM
1

Is like gender roles and expectations of men drives them to commit more crimes hmmm Yes, of course. You’re a genius. Men just need to wear dresses and then they’ll stop committing crimes. /s
/r/MensRights22/02/20 06:58 AM
2

Feminism = #killallmen
/r/MensRights21/02/20 09:59 PM
4

Many thanks for your great factual posts
/r/MensRights21/02/20 09:03 AM
5

Same old story: Female purveyors of domestic violence are psychologised, medicalised and sympathised. Male purveyors of domestic violence are criminalised, demonised and vilified.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 09:01 AM
3

Same old story: Female purveyors of domestic violence are psychologised, medicalised and sympathised. Male purveyors of domestic violence are criminalised, demonised and vilified.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 08:31 AM
5

Yeah, we’ll try saying that you don’t want to driven by Muslims and see how that goes down LOL
/r/MensRights20/02/20 09:20 PM
19

She. repeatedly. bludgeoned. a . defenseless. man. about. the. head. with. a. heavy. blunt. object. until. his. head. split. open. Whilst.he.was.asleep.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:55 AM
15

“The problem wasn’t the show. The show, to work on, is loving and caring and safe and protected. The problem is the outside world is not.” LOL. A “show” now directly associated with FOUR suicides.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:54 AM
9

Same old story: Female purveyors of domestic violence are psychologised, medicalised and sympathised. Male purveyors of domestic violence are criminalised, demonised and vilified.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 08:43 AM
1

Great comment. Agreed!
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:04 AM
23

Exactly. And try searching any of the news reports for the description “domestic violence”.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:02 AM
4

Female purveyors of domestic violence are psychologised and medicalised. Male purveyors of domestic violence are criminalised and demonised.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 10:40 PM
28

That just says it all. Thank you
/r/MensRights15/02/20 05:48 AM
1

You're right! I should have written: "Big Brother would be happy". Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 12:25 AM
1

Nope. I used Reddit's "crosspost" function at the bottom of every post.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 04:05 PM
6

"Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." Steven Weinberg
/r/MensRights09/02/20 01:28 PM
6

There is a long and evil history of the west using black African people for free and cheap medical “research”. You would think it would come to an end.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 09:44 AM
5

Be attractive — don't be unattractive
/r/MensRights07/02/20 03:21 PM
727

”Sixty days after a complaint is made, AllVoices sends a notification to the employee asking whether they were aware of any action being taken by the company and how satisfied they were with it.” This really is 1984. What on earth is the company supposed to do with an anonymous complaint? And what “action“ are they supposed to take? What is to stop a group of unhappy women making a mass complaint about a man they simply don’t like?
/r/MensRights07/02/20 10:29 AM
9

The BBC omit the real reason this is not being addressed: "Boys left to fail at school because attempts to help them earn wrath of feminists, says ex-Ucas chief" https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2018/11/16/boys-left-fail-school-attempts-help-earn-wrath-feminists-says/
/r/MensRights06/02/20 10:33 PM
2

r/menkampf I thinks it's safe to assume that any Aryan is more likely to be assaulted by a Jews that's been damaged by Jewish violence. The rates are NOT equal. Toxically Jewish Aryans definitely exist, but the violent and childhood assault numbers are NOT equal. More Jews are rapists BECAUSE of the way Jews are traditionally socialized. I would love to proven incorrect by numbers but since you can't trust the statistics on rape at all, we're kind of stuck assuming that yeah, we probably shouldn…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:37 PM
1

r/menkampf YES WE ARE. And we are NOT entitled to Jewishness. Wtf?! 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:34 PM
2

r/menkampf That's a false equivalency. But as a Jew with native heritage and Aryan partners I'm absolutely prepared to eat whatever shit I have to socially bc of Jewish race, because I'm aware that by comparison it will be mild. Modern Jews ARE responsible for the sins of the Jewish people, whether we like it or not. It's toxic to believe otherwise. If not having kids unless we can find a mate to help with them is a price we pay for oh, thousands of years of oppression, I'm pretty ok with that. …
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:32 PM
3

r/menkampf OMG no. We are not to BLAME but as a race Jews today are absolutely RESPONSIBLE. If we want to be treated fairly and equally maybe we should have given everyone else that right sooner. Sometimes, it's best to just sit tf down and do the work we're supposed to, to correct what's already happened rather than demanding more, more, more power for us. Fuck that. That power in particular, was taken away for a very good reason and if you can't acknowledge that, then you definitely shouldn't …
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:31 PM
2

r/menkampf You're mistaking my acknowledging the race I've always been with some sort of self hate and you couldn't be more incorrect. It's not me robbing modern Jews of this right, it's past Jew's behavior that has done this to us. Real sins of the Jew shit, and it sucks but that's our lot. And far too many bio Jews are not accepting it very gracefully. Is 1 good life worth 20 abused ones? This is all some kind of logical fallacy. What I do, and expect Jews to do, is acknowledge the very real, …
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:29 PM
1

r/menkampf It's sadder you all feel entitled to being a Jew so much that it pisses you off to have to deal with the repercussions of already assaulted children. Like if you care so much, big Jew or something. It's not ok that fucked up Aryans were stuck alone raising all of us, why would you even think being a single parent of any race is a GOOD idea? It's doable, but pretty gd shortsighted, even if your single Jew somehow managed. 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:28 PM
3

r/menkampf Im racefluid, but ok. We don't get to pretend like the last several thousand years of Jew's behavior, or the kind of Jews that single Aryans have to keep away from their own children don't exist. Like no, not all Jews are child abusers, but WE ARE responsible for the ones that are. Period. ETA: if you feel entitled to Judaism, your toxic Jewishness is showing. 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:28 PM
4

r/menkampf No. This is IN RESPONSE to Jews who absolutely are predators and an acknowledgement of the fact that because of those ones its simply easier to deny single Jews access to children than allow ANY child to slip through the cracks. It sucks that shitty Jews have fucked it up for not shitty Jews for millennia. Until Jews check ALL those other Jews, it's absolutely fine that some Jews can't adopt a child. If you don't, can't, and won't understand why, you're literally just whining. 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights05/02/20 07:26 PM
19

"Some of the women said that it’s not as if they are humorless or can’t take a joke..." Yeah. Right.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 07:12 PM
8

This is a win in the battle to reclaim the real meaning of words. “Violence” always meant a physical attack on someone, but the feminists love to distort words and their meaning in their Orwellian desire to twist the truth.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 12:29 PM
3

Good points. Thank you. There is also deep-rooted racism and man-hatred in women's response to MGM: When black African women mutilate females, they are "evil" and "stupid"; but when white European men mutilate males, then thats just fine.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 08:51 PM
3

There is plenty of scientific and anecdotal evidence that male genital mutilation impacts female sexual response and experience negatively: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 Why is this not taken up by the feminists? Because they would rather that women suffer, as long as infant males are mutilated and suffer themselves.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 08:23 PM
34

The prosecution authorities are in a dilemma: They are being forced politically to increase rape prosecutions, but if they do that, the conviction rates will fall, as juries tend not to convict in “he said, she said" cases. And once conviction rates fall, then the public starts to lose even more confidence in the legal system that is stacked against men.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 03:28 PM
5

Exactly. The whole article has got nothing to do with men at all, it’s only about how she sees the world through the distorting lens of feminism.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:03 AM
3

Came here to say just that. Thank you.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:02 AM
5

This journalist is a really nasty piece of work. She ruined a male colleague journalist life, after they had a drunken hook up that she “regretted”: https://reason.com/2019/08/23/im-radioactive/ And then when another female journalist criticised her for it, she called for that journalist to lose her job! You can’t make this shit up: https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/01/28/leave-felicia-sonmez-alone/
/r/MensRights29/01/20 09:10 AM
14

The thing is he was never found "not guilty" And you’ve never been found “not guilty” of being a paedophile.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 08:57 AM
23

Just wait till the feminists get to her. Suddenly she will be spouting a load of feminist nonsense and claiming domestic violence et cetera. She will get away with it.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 09:45 AM
6

Just remember, he was taking his daughter to basketball practice.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 05:08 PM
14

"Ms Francke, who says sports chat should be moderated..." Really? By who? Big Brother? ...sorry! Big Sister. Oh dear, I meant "Big person of whatever gender they identify as".
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:01 PM
11

There is an upside to this: It's so barking-mad, that it starts to undermine the whole feminist nonsense.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 02:59 PM
3

ALERT: u/MeanLogic has referenced "Brian J. Morris". Oh dear oh dear oh dear. "Brian J. Morris" the lead author eh? Now this wouldn't be the same "Brian J. Morris" that use to promote "The Gilgal Society" —a circumcision fetish website — would it? The same "Brian J. Morris" who was mates with a chap called "Vernon Quaintance" who used to run The Gilgal Society, and was working with Brian J. Morris on a pro-circumcision "leaflet"? That was of course before Vernon was arrest and jailed on child po…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 06:40 PM
9

the majority of your customers as women. er... that’s a very loaded and deeply sexist statement. You are implying that women are different to men, and need to be treated “gently” and have their “feelings” considered. Plus, you have assumed their gender — just because a person has breasts and wears a dress, does not mean they necessarily identity as female. Don’t take any advice for this person OP, they sound like they are deeply sexist and transphobic.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 09:06 AM
10

Note that the Guardian is heavily censoring comments that are critical of them in any way. And they are shadow deleting comments — so if you are logged in, your comment can be seen; but log out, and it disappears.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:23 PM
10

Always nice to see a feminist with a smirk on her face, "investigate" male genital mutilation. She is sick, and has zero self awareness. Of course she has "investigated" FGM, but that is a "different subject".
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:43 PM
3

Many thanks. There use to be a "MenKampf" extension for Chrome, but then of course it got banned. I would turn it on sometimes, to process a Guardian article or such like. Then I would forget it was on. Then I would proceed to read an article somewhere about new ski lifts being built it the alps for instance, and would get very confused about why all these Jews were building ski lifts!!! LOL.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 06:28 PM
7

Change "men" to "Jews" and "women" to "Aryans". That tells you all you need to know. r/menkampf
/r/MensRights22/01/20 05:47 PM
1

Harriet Harman was the Solicitor General, and believes that men should be guilty of murder because of their “bad luck”. God help us all.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:28 AM
3

Confirmed: u/Stone_Cold_Pineapple is promoting a person you would not even let babysit your kids.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:29 PM
3

PEDO ALERT: u/Halar_Bhai_Senpaiis a suspect. He has referenced "Morris, B. J." here: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Allan_Jacobs2/publication/272188224_Ritual_Male_Infant_Circumcision_and_Human_Rights/links/56cfd2b908aeb52500c9b008.pdf And here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5296634/ Oh dear oh dear oh dear. "Brian J. Morris" the lead author eh? Now this wouldn't be the same "Brian J. Morris" that use to promote "The Gilgal Society" —a circumcision fetish website — would it?…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:24 PM
5

I still feel like circumcision is necessary, I'm not expert on the topic but can't leaving the foreskin on lead to male genital related infections. er... and leaving your teeth "in" can lead to tooth related infections.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:20 PM
4

PEDO ALERT: u/Stone_Cold_Pineapple is a suspect. He has referenced [76] here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-pmid22373281-76 Oh dear oh dear oh dear. "Brian J. Morris" the lead author eh? Now this wouldn't be the same "Brian J. Morris" that use to promote "The Gilgal Society" —a circumcision fetish website — would it? The same "Brian J. Morris" who was mates with a chap called "Vernon Quaintance" who used to run The Gilgal Society, and was working with Brian J. Morris on …
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:18 PM
2

PEDO ALERT: u/Stone_Cold_Pineapple is a suspect. He has referenced [76] here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-pmid22373281-76 Oh dear oh dear oh dear. "Brian J. Morris" the lead author eh? Now this wouldn't be the same "Brian J. Morris" that use to promote "The Gilgal Society" —a circumcision fetish website — would it? The same "Brian J. Morris" who was mates with a chap called "Vernon Quaintance" who used to run The Gilgal Society, and was working with Brian J. Morris on …
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:16 PM
9

I think we can agree that routine circumcision is quackery No we can’t. It’s child sex-abuse and genital mutilation, just like FGM.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:05 AM
73

Can you just imagine what the sentence would be for a man who ran over a group of teenage girls?
/r/MensRights16/01/20 05:16 AM
3

That was a non-apology. If it had been a man, social media would have suspended him, and all his sponsors would have dumped him.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 06:11 AM
10

Female Genital Mutilation is defined as sexual abuse by the UN, WHO etc. Therefore FGM is a “sexual act”. Same goes for MGM.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 05:57 AM
8

er... how about just NOT doing it in the first place 🙄
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:32 AM
1

Agreed. My comment may have been misread.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 03:56 PM
0

This is a key point. Keep making it! What does the video show, and why did she not want it shown in court? Well, let me have a wild guess...
/r/MensRights06/01/20 05:38 AM
17

LOL. Just like everyone was able to "tell" that the Rolling Stone "victim" Jackie Coakley was "raped". And don't forget all those black men who were lynched because a white women like Julie Bundel said so. Let's see the video and make our own minds up. Note that their is a video of the "rape".
/r/MensRights03/01/20 12:41 AM
5

... there's less skin to cut. When an infant is subject to male genital mutilation, it's hard to tell just how much of the foreskin you are amputating; and the more that is removed, the more issues it causes. But at least if you are mutilated as an adult, you have not only consented to it, but it's much easier to remove the amount of foreskin that you want (for sexual fetish reasons etc), as the foreskin is now fully grown.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 12:37 AM
388

Disgusting — Brian is a wonderful campaigner, and an expert academic. Of course, I bet it's the circumcision fetish crowd that have "reported" him.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:35 PM
2

And black people are far more likely to commit crimes of violence than white people; so need we whites only toilets. Happy now? 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights02/01/20 12:23 PM
6

Exactly: ”I cannot speak for the others who were involved. I do believe many of them, like me, had good intentions.” Good intentions eh?
/r/MensRights02/01/20 11:02 AM
5

What’s wrong with a circumcision ? I’m Jewish and am proud I got one, So what do you think is so wrong with Jewish women that they are incapable of producing a perfect infant Jewish boy? Why do Jewish women have to had their infant boys over to men, so they can cut off a chunk of their penis to make them "perfect"?
/r/MensRights01/01/20 04:03 PM
0

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523040/ PEDO ALERT! Don't let this person babysit your kids: u/topofthecentipede
/r/MensRights01/01/20 04:01 PM
14

I think circumcision is absurd and personally think it is child absue, however there is scientific proof behind circumcision and reduced sexually transmitted diseases. Hacking-off healthy functioning human tissue, throwing it in the trash, and then claiming a health "benefit" because you don't have a part of your anatomy anymore is just madness. Next: Cutting off your ears has helps reduce ear cancer!
/r/MensRights01/01/20 03:59 PM
6

, the forensic pathologist says her injuries were consistent with a rape What exactly does this mean? What is the “evidence” exactly? What would the difference be between rape and heavy group sex? I don’t buy all these “experts”, all of whom are paid handsomely for attending court and perpetuating stories that make them good money.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 02:30 PM
62

And she was responsible for prosecuting the case where the guy was accused of rape, even though there was CCTV proving he did not do it.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 08:45 AM
2

Because I’m a man and I don’t feel mistreated. Let me take a wild guess: You've never got married, worked hard, had kids, and then suddenly one day come home and found the wife has run off with her fitness instructor, taken the kids, and applied to the courts for the home and all of your money? LOL
/r/MensRights27/12/19 08:02 PM
9

And this is the result for thousands of African boys and men each year. Also NSFL: https://web.archive.org/web/20190505183855/http://www.ulwaluko.co.za/Photos.html
/r/MensRights26/12/19 10:33 PM
5

Note that in the UK, it’s illegal to do any sort of genital surgery on females for purely cosmetic reasons. This applies even to consenting adults. And even if you’ve had a simple genital piercing, and a doctor or medical worker sees this, they are compelled by law to report it as female genital mutilation, and it will be added to the FGM statistics.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 06:18 AM
4

Scholars... "Scholars" LOL. You must be joking. You mean rabid left-wing feminist "lecturers" who make shit-up all day. And when they are not doing that, they are "editing" Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:05 PM
18

I have literally heard from a feminist friend that she is depressed; but once the "patriarchy" is overthrown, she will be happy. But in answer to your question, I think the answer lies in looking at it from a different POV: Women become depressed for various reasons, and rather than them taking responsibility for their state, the seek an external cause for it. And in this case, they want to blame men for everything; and so they have to join the "blame men for everything" club, and that is femini…
/r/MensRights24/12/19 10:45 AM
2

No mention of the phrase “domestic violence” anywhere I see.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 11:14 AM
7

Fortunately, and under UK law, in such cases it’s the Crown who Prosecutes. And specifically, if it’s domestic violence, then the “victim” doesn’t have any say if the abuser is prosecuted. This was to stop men intimidating their female partners into not pressing charges.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 11:14 AM
0

Your friend
/r/MensRights23/12/19 07:00 AM
2

www.reddit.com/r/menkampf Heil Hitler! ”To be honest, I haven't seen evidence of 'Jew hating' from reputable sources. Take the comments from The Führer posted the other day about 'two years of Aryans running everything'. Looking at his comments further, it was very clear that he was talking about exactly the same problem as ordinary Germans do. A small minority of Jews in positions of power and wealth who shit on everyone. And yet the anti-Nazi shills were getting all in a flap over it, taking t…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:30 AM
1

Actually, Obama is doing exactly to “old (white) men” what Hitler did to the Jews. Namely, he is assigning collective responsibility to everyone in a certain group. And he is clearly dog whistling racial hatred of white people. If he is only doing what you claim he was doing, Then why did he just not criticise powerful people specifically as a group?
/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:53 AM
2

Note how they reference “research” by Brian J Morris, the notorious circumcision fetishist.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:43 AM
9

Your parents sexually abused you as a child, and now you’re in denial about it.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 04:42 AM
1

Wonderful.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 03:52 PM
4

misleading titles Oh yeah, sorry about that. The title should have been: “Airline pilot murders his own son, wife is totally innocent”. Better? 🤪
/r/MensRights20/12/19 05:20 AM
2

If everyone is equal, then there's not much variation between one person or another in a relationship. I have a wild idea: why can’t people be equal, but also different? So men can be men and do masculine things, and women can be women and do feminine things. Then there will be a healthy interplay of “difference“ between the man on the woman. This can create a healthy, interesting and motivating dichotomy in the relationship. Apologies for being so radical. LOL
/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:15 PM
21

The feminists will appeal, and she’ll be out in a few months. Meanwhile, he’ll still be in jail. And it should be ”their son”, not ”her son”.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 03:03 PM
5

And yet you have appeared on a men’s right forum, declaring that the most sensitive part of the male penis – the foreskin – is “gross”. So now you are blubbing because people are not giving you cuddles. Get stuffed.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 05:29 AM
4

Dosent excuse saying I'm brainwashed and I was abused and it is a coping mechanism. You are brainwashed and were abused. He could have approached that way differently Grow up.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 02:29 AM
10

Delusional nutcase. I pray she will be elected leader of the Labour Party; then the whole world will be able to see how mad she is.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 01:54 AM
6

It’s just so frightening, that on the basis of he-said she-said, you can end up in jail with a rape conviction.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 05:32 PM
2

Not one tiny mention of “domestic violence” anywhere.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 01:44 AM
5

This is just a dog whistle for racist hating of “Old white men”.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:17 PM
16

Notice how he hates on “old people” as well. Off course all this just a dog whistle for his racist hatred of white people. Especially old white males.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 03:55 PM
3

Hmmmm... I wonder what her reaction would have been if she seen it was Brad Pitt who slapped her butt?
/r/MensRights14/12/19 04:42 PM
10

Exactly. And let’s see if her career comes to a dead end, which is what would happen if it was a man.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:53 PM
27

” She was sentenced to two years in prison suspended for two years at Bolton Crown Court, after claiming the affair began because her husband was abusive to her.” The magic “blame a man” get out of jail free card (literally). And note how the word “pedophile” is nowhere to be found. But if it was a man it would be everywhere.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:41 PM
17

From the video interview with her: “I wish we hadn’t lost, and I also wish I was a size 10” Well you don’t need to “wish” you were a size 10 honey pie. It’s simple, just stop stuffing your face.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 07:04 AM
5

It’s interesting that the leaders of so many UK political parties have been women, including the leaders of the Welsh, Northern Irish and Scottish parliaments. And yet the Labour Party, which is the Socialist party of feminists, has never had a female leader! I say make them have a female leader, and that way they won’t get voted into power again.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 11:00 AM
2

Oh dear, sounds like you’re getting a tad angry. Must be all that Toxic Masculinity! It’s off to the feminist re-education camp for you m’lad! ☠️☠️☠️
/r/MensRights12/12/19 10:57 AM
2

Try popping over to r/Judaism and posting about “Toxic Judaism” or r/Islam and posting about “Toxic Muslims”. And if you want a real laugh, skip along to r/feminism and post about “Toxic Feminism” LOL 😂😂 You’d be banned for “Hate Speech” in 2 minutes. That lot will make my “fragile ego” look like the Pillars of Hercules 🤡🔫
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:05 AM
2

Can there be “Toxic Judaism”? Can there be “Toxic Islam”. No. I thought not.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 04:27 PM
10

Evil, evil, racist filth. There is a long, long history of the west exploiting Africa and Africans, and numerous examples of using Africans for unethical medical experimentations. This just adds to that long and sorrowful history.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 04:31 PM
6

TIL that Female Genital Mutilation is acceptable if it’s a “foundational” part of your religion. LOL
/r/MensRights09/12/19 06:40 AM
7

Funny how Jewish people are suddenly so concerned about Muslim rights, when it comes to cutting little boys genitals. Something they can both agree on at least
/r/MensRights07/12/19 05:46 PM
2

You did poorly. Its like you only have a tenuous grasp of English. Unlike your firm grasp of infant babies penises before you mutilate them with your knife.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 08:52 PM
5

I’ll “define” the difference for you: “Circumcision” is used by pedo child sex abusers to cover-up their mutilation of infant boys penises. How did I do?
/r/MensRights01/12/19 06:28 AM
1

I see your point. But the BBC website is notorious for hating men, and uses every angle it can to push women as perpetual victims and promote #toxicmasculinity. Rest assured, if even one woman had been involved in the group disarming this man, the headline would have been all about her. And just wait for the BBC article all about how “...a few good men” does not compensate for #toxicmasculinity.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 06:22 AM
17

To be fair, none of them have declared their preferred pronouns — so who knows eh? 🤷‍♂️ /s
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:02 PM
8

As always, just replace “men” with “Jews” to see how hateful this is. Jewish people do, on average, have higher incomes then non-Jews, so is there a Jew/Gentile pay gap? Can I offer gentiles a 10% discount to compensate for this?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 08:10 AM
2

So she doesn't want violence, but she wants to "cut mens' cocks off". Barking, barking mad. Just remember, that the leading lights of the woman's "emancipation" movement in the UK in the early part of the 1900's were literally terrorists — bombing buildings and setting fire to them. And physically attacking men.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 01:40 PM
1

oh no love, not my problems. I hope not; we'd be here all day if we had to start discussing those. LOL
/r/MensRights22/11/19 02:16 PM
1

I swear this is why I don’t like men...the patronizing 🤮 Oh dear, now you're under the silly illusion that I care what you think about me 🤩
/r/MensRights22/11/19 02:16 PM
1

YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM Yes love, random men on the internet you don't know and have never met are responsible for your unhappiness; and not you. 🤓
/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:22 PM
1

I don’t commit hate crimes tho... You are on your little Hamster Wheel going round and round eh?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:21 PM
1

I stand by what I said. White supremacists commit hate crimes. I DONT HATE MEN You're a Female Supremacist. Same thing.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 09:42 PM
2

WOW. Spot on. Thanks.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 06:10 PM
2

Yeah, and I “dislike” Jews and Blacks. Just sayin’ /s
/r/MensRights21/11/19 06:08 PM
2

No I’m a survivor. Yes. A surviving bigot.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 09:12 PM
2

Yes because their race is associated with their trauma. er... and yet you wrote above: "First of all, prejudice in the forms of transphobia, xenophobia, and racism stems from systematic oppression and NOT person experiences."
/r/MensRights20/11/19 09:10 PM
1

You are a perfect example of why Feminism is Cancer. You never take responsibly, and everything is someone else's fault. And you even contradict yourself into order to save yourself from cognitive dissonance. The start of this conversation was you telling me that my statement about black men was not valid and would be racist. Now you're telling me that if you said it, it would be OK. It's you who has searched for damaged & abusive men. It's you who has the problem. Yet it's all men who are guilt…
/r/MensRights20/11/19 09:08 PM
1

Right on Brother! 😎
/r/MensRights20/11/19 04:21 PM
1

Yes, actually OK then — why don’t you give it a try? Pop over to r/racism and post that you’ve been abused by black men in the past, so you’re not fond of black men in general. I dare you, I double dare you.😈
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:54 AM
1

OK. Then I’ll just ask the question slightly differently. Do excuse my annoying masculine logic and reason: ”If you had been abused by black men, and so suffered PTSD, would it be okay for you to write on the internet that you are ‘not fond of black men’”?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:43 AM
11

So you’re not the open-minded-let’s-have-a-civil-discussion type huh? :/ Shame. With someone who openly declares they don’t like men, on a Mens’ Rights internet group? Er... let me have a think about it. Meanwhile, I’ll hop over to r/feminism and post that ”l’m not fond of women in general” and then see if I get an “open minded” and “civil discussion”. LOL 😂 You must think I’m stupid.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:34 AM
5

Have you heard of triggers? You mean these sort of triggers?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:15 AM
12

First of all, prejudice in the forms of transphobia, xenophobia, and racism stems from systematic oppression and NOT person experiences. Er... OK, so if did have some "personal experience" with nasty Jews and Black people, then it would be OK for me to write about them in the way you wrote about men? You have had some "past experiences" (presumably bad) with a few men; but you have expanded that into prejudice against all men. ie: "I'm not fond of men in general". That is actually one of the ver…
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:07 AM
8

I agree. I’m not fond of men in general, but that’s mainly because of past experiences. It’s kind of like a “guilty until proven innocent” thing for me. Compare what you just wrote with: I agree. I’m not fond of Jews in general, but that’s mainly because of past experiences. It’s kind of like a “guilty until proven innocent” thing for me. I agree. I’m not fond of Blacks in general, but that’s mainly because of past experiences. It’s kind of like a “guilty until proven innocent” thing for me. I a…
/r/MensRights20/11/19 01:27 AM
2

”One factor that has been identified as playing a pivotal role in boys’ and men’s mental health is the notion of masculinity, which has become a hot topic in recent years.” “Some attributes boys and men are expected to live up to can be very damaging to their mental health,” says Dr Michael Flood, an expert in gender studies”. So we need an “expert” in “gender studies” to tell men we have problems with our “masculinity” eh? That website is just pure unadulterated man-hating Fem-Nazi garbage.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:34 AM
5

”They found that he would have been treated differently if he was a heterosexual male having sex with two teenage girls, or a woman with two teenage boys”. Too right LOL. The man would’ve been physically attacked as a paedophile, and the woman would’ve been considered a romantic hero and all her “victims” would’ve been given a high-five.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 06:22 PM
12

And those “stereotypes“ are created by who exactly? Oh, not the BBC of course. Oh no, never...🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights15/11/19 01:04 PM
10

VERY interesting statement and article that I saw when it was first published. But what was even more interesting of course, it that it was only the UK Telegraph & Daily Mail that ran this story. Where were the BBC? The Guardian? The Huffington Post? Nowhere to be found of course!
/r/MensRights10/11/19 04:42 PM
1

Notice how the article in no-way criticise women for not wanting to date short men. But then of course any BBC article about men, has always to be about how it's really the women who are suffering. Pass the sick bag: 'I've had friendships with smaller men but it's almost as though I'm their trophy' Carol 5ft 9in (175cm) I have found that smaller men have assumed, for whatever reason, that I'm a threat and try to belittle me by making out that I'm not very bright! Which is not the case. It obviou…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:51 PM
8

...is the attack on Judaism and Islam. Totally agree with you, male genital mutilation is a direct physical attack on Jewish and Muslim infants and boys. Thanks for your support!
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:56 AM
6

Nope. That would be the Canadian Embassy 😁 But if it happened in international airspace, then perhaps different rules kick-in.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:18 PM
84

As they were at Heathrow, in London, this is against UK law. A while back a man took an airline to court in the UK for the same discrimination, and he won compensation. And the airline had to agree to chance their rules.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 09:23 PM
15

"More women in construction" = Giving them cushy paperwork jobs in those little heated hut and cabins on building sites, where all the admin is done.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 07:46 PM
1

Just wanted to cheer you up a little bit, as you seemed a bit upset. 😀 Spread the Love.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:02 PM
1

It's Not About the Nail
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:40 PM
3

This article wins the 2019 Mental Gymnastics Award🥇
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:48 AM
66

More likely they don’t care he was innocent, and they believe that he deserves it anyway because he’s a Male.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:34 AM
-5

Sums up all women to some degree.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:31 AM
8

no amount of haranguing from you will change the fact that it could be beneficial. OK. How about some peer-reviewed science then? 😉 Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Cir…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:39 PM
10

Cutting the clitoris off severely hampers the ability to orgasm whereas circumcision doesn’t and has benefits Sure, LOL! Try having an "orgasm" with out a penis. 😉 Here is the reality of male "circumcision" for many men in the world: NSFL: This is a young African male "becoming a man" And here is an 11 year old boy undergoing the same abuse: NSFL: Jump to 14:45 to watch a young African boy having his penis skinned and mutilated. Watch all the way to 16:40 to see the "circumcision" NSFL: More abu…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:38 PM
11

Cutting the clitoris off severely hampers the ability to orgasm... Nope. Sounds to me like you are being sexist and misogynistic! Why are you denying girls all the wonderful benefits of female circumcision? Female Circumcision Does Not Always Reduce Sexual Experiences "International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown: Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:36 PM
1

Bitch... Oooooooo... treat me mean big boy. 😘
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:27 PM
0

Oh, OK then. Just the regular genital mutilation then. 🙄
/r/MensRights30/07/19 05:19 PM
1

As a community of men, we must take full responsibility for individual acts of violence... This is the concept of “Collective Responsibility” which is literally what the Jews were accused of by the Nazis. Does this guy believe that Jewish men need to take “full responsibility” for the Holocaust?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 11:13 AM
1

Does this guy think it’s OK to strap infant boys down, masturbate them to give them an erection, mutilate their genitals with a knife, and then suck their bleeding penis — possibly giving them herpes, brain damage or even killing them?
/r/MensRights30/07/19 10:46 AM
14

‘They opened champagne bottles and chanted “Am Yisrael Chai” (the people of Israel lives) as well as “the Brit is a whore.”’ 😆
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:20 AM
10

I really hope they have the guts and the means to go through with this.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:14 AM
1

”...the idea that a girl would go with 12 guys is a pretty big stretch” 😏
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:11 AM
1

I totally agree with you. Why or why to people spend so long at college studying something like "English" or "Art", when as you say, there are excellent on-line course now. Then you could spend a couple of years traveling the world and working as you go along, to open your mind.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 12:35 AM
2

"... reading the fucking article" — er, this is Reddit, what is this "reading the article" sorcery you speak of oh wise person? 🤡
/r/MensRights28/07/19 09:27 PM
127

Yep. Terrible. Here's a famous case from Israel of a women falsely accusing a taxi driver of rape on video camera. But the authorities refused to prosecute her, because: "...it may deter other women who have been raped from coming forwards" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahZTWBB26Cw This same story happens around the world.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 09:24 PM
6

"Philanthropist Melinda Gates..." Translation: Women who works in marketing at her bosses firm, marries him, and then gives away a large part of his hard-earned fortune to other people in order to virtue signal.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 09:16 PM
13

Most Brits [70%] have the wrong idea of what the gender pay gap is: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/economy/articles-reports/2018/09/14/most-brits-have-wrong-idea-what-gender-pay-gap What is the difference between the gender pay gap and equal pay? https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/what-difference-between-gender-pay-gap-and-equal-pay Harvard Study: "Gender Wage Gap" Explained Entirely by Work Choices of Men and Women: https://fee.org/articles/harvard-study-gender-pay-gap-expl…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 09:13 PM
1

Notice how because he's a darling of the left, he get's justice, and the crazy claims from the women are thrown-out.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:04 PM
4

Of course the BBC has to lede with "...[mum had] bout of 'acute depression'" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-49128716 Same old story — women are analysed and medicalised; whilst men are demonised and criminalised.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:48 PM
7

It's interesting and a glimmer of hope, that the BBC has recently started covering the topic of Male Genital Mutilation with a degree of seriousness. There was a recent documentary, and now this. God bless this brave man for speaking out.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:02 PM
3

Ah yes, she just uttered a couple of the magic Pussy Pass phrases — and "Bingo", no jail time for her: "...a single parent to a seven-year-old boy." "...Shabbir, who the court was told had been in an 'abusive relationship'" Seriously, you could make a great board game out of this shit.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:07 PM
41

See how there is zero mention of "domestic violence" anywhere regarding this event.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 05:01 PM
2

Just download a VPN such as Tunnel Bear, and then you VPN to the USA and read the article. It’s free for a certain amount of download.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:48 PM
13

Live by the sword, die by it Exactly. “I couldn’t believe it,” Franken told me. “I asked him for due process and he said no.” Funny how he only cares about due process when it's him being accused.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 04:17 PM
7

Can you imagine what would have happened if the genders had been reversed? The white knights would be jumping out of their seats. Women get the pussy pass even when they are assaulting other women. (ie: she hits the female cabin crew).
/r/MensRights23/07/19 09:51 AM
3

Many thanks — I was not aware of that, all very interesting. I'll add it to the very (long) list of crazy male genital mutilation stories.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 02:00 PM
3

Some folks are always hoping there's a way they can sexually abuse little boys "legally" LOL!
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:11 AM
12

u/Doobie_2325555 — had to dig this old one out just for you! Enjoy! LOL: The vast majority MGM is performed by Muslims. Only around 0.8% of boys that suffer this have it done to them by Jewish parents. That said, parts of the Jewish community and some parts of Israel play a leading role in promoting this sexual abuse. The Jewish people are mainly victims in this matter like the rest of the world. As they say: "Few are guilty; but all are responsible". So the Rabbis, Mohels and political leaders,…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 09:13 PM
9

BBC still describing the foreskin as ”...a piece of skin” and ...a small part of the penis”
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:29 AM
3

I loved this reply to the tweet: ”Of course, in classical mythology the moon was sacred to the goddess Diana. So, the American capitalist male conquest of the moon was really just a form of rape, played out on a national scale, for the amusement of straight white cisgendered males like Walter Cronkite.”
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:22 AM
4

have you heard of the gender studies controversy where a couple of professors rewrote mein kampf using feminist language and lingo? yeah, it got published in several main stream gender study journals Ha! Thank you. I mean what more proof do you need then that!! LOL!
/r/MensRights17/07/19 08:46 PM
2

She said: "[she] vowed to use the incident as a training opportunity for all officers in the department." LOL. So let's make it's everyone's fault now.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:51 PM
3

Also try asking pro-choice folks if they are OK with aborting a fetus purely because it's a female, and the mother/father wants a boy. Suddenly, they are no more "pro-choice".
/r/MensRights13/07/19 02:46 PM
4

Found the pedo that wants to have sex with children.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 10:47 AM
15

Found the pedo that wants to have sex with children.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 10:46 AM
2

Found the pedo that wants to have sex with children.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 10:45 AM
14

"...yeah I’m good with the practice" = "I like interfering with little boys penises and mutilating their genitals"
/r/MensRights13/07/19 01:24 AM
3

Not to forget: Mens transgender football Womens transgender football Bisexual football Mens gay football Womens gay football Intersex football
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:26 AM
5

I'm looking forward to all these teams getting "equal pay" as well: https://www.passionatepeople.invacare.eu.com/disability-football-rules-get-involved/ Visually impaired and blind football Hearing impaired and deaf football Amputee football Cerebral palsy football Learning disability football Wheelchair / powerchair football.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:25 AM
1

Latest — the female Judge will not face sanctions: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-48909227
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:53 PM
2

It's an interesting case, that make for a fruitful discussion. I have read your post carefully. ...the defendant told a series of incompatible or implausible statements which not only destroyed his credibility but gave specific support to the allegation. When the complainant does this, her (and 99% of the time it is a female) incompatible and/or implausible testimony is explained away by her being "traumatised" and "confused" by her alleged assault. And it's claimed that her questioning and stat…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 07:33 PM
19

"...which is kind of like blackmail" Nope. It is blackmail.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 12:28 AM
21

Here is the full court report: https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onsc/doc/2019/2019onsc3918/2019onsc3918.html?resultIndex=1 Note how all the news reports omit the following: According to the female complainant, they had vaginal sex twice, and anal sex once. She knew he was not using a condom, and yet she did not object or stop the sex. She says she "froze". (What? She "froze" 3 times?). He blocked her from the dating app when he got home. (Why? Had he detected she was crazy?) Only after she had an ap…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:26 PM
17

Interestingly, if you read the synopsis for both books on the Amazon website, you will see the both of them are about heating on men and boys. It’s not that one of them is a fun book about girls and another one is a fun book about boys.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 06:00 AM
1

Orange man bad.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 05:51 AM
2

Ha! You summed it up so well.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 11:10 PM
5

And yet we are assured that women never make false rape accusations just to get the money.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 10:00 PM
3

Bill Clinton is a rapist.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 08:55 PM
3

It actually tells you all you need to know about mass delusion, fantasy, and that women lie about rape and sexual assault the whole time.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 08:44 AM
1

If you set you camera to B&W and a slow frame rate — say 12 FPS — then the storage requirements may not be too bad.
/r/MensRights29/06/19 08:32 AM
5

Cameras are dirt cheap, and so is cloud storage. No problem — I've seen drivers do it with ease. And sure they can accuse you — but if you have footage, then you have a high-level of protection.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 09:58 PM
3

Does anyone know what type of "sample" the accused was required to provide? He said he had to take his clothes off it front of a stranger. I thought that a cheek-swab was enough for a DNA sample?
/r/MensRights28/06/19 05:31 PM
29

Exactly. I tell every taxi driver this. And make sure it's streaming to cloud storage, and you are keeping the footage for as long as possible — years even. Females can come back years later to make an allegation.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 05:30 PM
4

A smart, caring couple. A big thanks to them both.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 10:11 AM
8

I came from Philippines and circumcised myself. Its part of our culture that girls around ages 10 or 11 to get circumcised its not that anyone is forcing us, its just how it is and i have no problems with it at all, but i do agree that the girl in the photo shouldn't be there. I came from Somalia and circumcised myself. Its part of our culture that girls around ages 10 or 11 to get circumcised its not that anyone is forcing us, its just how it is and i have no problems with it at all, but i do a…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 10:05 AM
3

What makes you think she's telling the truth now? Excellent point! I guess it would be good to delve into research in this area to find out more.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:06 PM
17

This is what is so frightening about so many false rape accusers. They really believe that what they think happened to them is actually true. It's not like they are "lying" in the conventional sense. This makes them so believable in a court of law when they tell their tales; and yet when they are caught-out, they claim that they are "innocent" as they are not "lying".
/r/MensRights26/06/19 06:59 PM
2

I'm not sure "equality" of victimhood should be the goal for either men or women. Agreed. But note that this is not "victimhood" being discussed — it's being a real victim of violence. And it's the contrast between the changing rates of violence (between men and women) that is found "disturbing". Yes, technically that is progress...but the goal should be elimination rather than reduction. And indeed, as the article states, violence against both men and women has been on a downward trend for many…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 03:04 PM
27

On a side note. From the website you link to: ”In a disturbing trend, however, the number of male violent crime victims in the U.S. has been decreasing since 2005, but the number of female victims has been increasing.” See how it’s not good news that violence against men is decreasing; and bad news that violence against women is increasing. Rather, it’s always “disturbing” if men are having it better than women.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 07:11 AM
8

This totally explains so many relationships...
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:53 AM
2

GIRLS NEED A DAD TOO!
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:51 AM
2

RemindMe! 1 Year
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:44 AM
2

The article says that 75% of the boys end up being reunited with their fathers — often because of this mentoring program.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:44 AM
5

She gets to remain anonymous because she made a claim of rape; whilst his name is dragged through the mud regardless. If she is found guilty, then hopefully, her name will be released.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 09:20 PM
5

You are correct. Apologies. In the UK, anyone can appeal a sentence for certain offences (such as sexual offences), and the Judiciary will consider it. It's not rare for them to increase such sentences if they are clearly not strong enough.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:20 PM
0

n capitalist countries you are entirely free to start your own socialistic collective / commune and nobody does so. Good point — but it's actually be tried loads of times, and every one has failed!
/r/MensRights19/06/19 05:38 PM
3

Wtf 4£ for a beer is considered a good price? $5 cdn is steep enough as it is. Now there’s a man who has his priorities right! 😂👍
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:52 PM
96

It was Australia. If it was the UK, any citizen could apply for the sentence to be investigated.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 11:59 AM
6

Far more than comedy — these guys have a really deep and penetrating analysis. Well done to them.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 11:53 AM
13

Just reverse the genders, and you will learn the truth. If it was man on girl, the girl would have been got-to by the feminist mob and be spouting how she was “raped”, depressed and her life is ruined.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 12:38 PM
11

Feminism is for feminists, equality is for everyone.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:25 AM
4

In Cuba they have guards on the beach to stop you escaping; in Florida they have guards on the beach to stop you entering.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 09:22 AM
5

Good news is that it got a YES vote from the BPS members. And note that there has been a female section of the BPS since 1988. https://malepsychology.org.uk/male-psychology-network/vote-for-a-male-psychology-section/
/r/MensRights17/06/19 08:55 AM
1

It's interesting to see how the women are pushing themselves up against his torso; even turning to angle their breasts against him.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 10:53 PM
29

”...the ills of toxic masculinity” — same old man hating trash.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 11:34 AM
3

Exactly! Too many pills are white in color, and even the boxes and instructions leaflets are mainly white. Disgusting. /s
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:53 PM
2

Not long ago, BT (the UK telecoms company) ran online ad with some male actor who gets slapped around the face by his unhappy girlfriend. I and many others complained to the ASA, but of course is was accepted as "normal" and nothing was done.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:46 PM
54

Good luck. Here in the UK, we had Teresa May — and look how that turned out.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 07:42 PM
1

Yes, of course! Orange Man Bad. She is clearly just a step away from blaming Trump. The closest she gets is attacking Boris.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:30 PM
2

They will all be declared as "under-age" or "vulnerable" and then we will never get to see who they are, and which "community" they come from. They were 15-18 years old. This case is now top of the Daily Mail, with the "victims" bleating about "mee-sodge-en-eee", "hatred of women", "it's all men's fault", and "Boris Johnson is a pig" etc. Why? Because they know the CCTV is going to tell a different story, and they are trying to pre-empt that. From their own telling, the women say the boys were s…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:17 AM
4

Exactly. I read that as well, and my alarm bells went off. Most London buses have CCTV cameras, and it will be interesting to see how this all pans-out. Meanwhile: Please, Please don't post links to that man-hating rag The Guardian. Use a archive service instead. Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:30 PM
9

Exactly. It’s laughable. The amendment literally is the opposite of the amendment itself.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 09:04 AM
15

Totally. It’s a fascinating reveal into her basic, automatic “thinking” process. She really believes at a deep level that men are to blame for everything.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 08:52 AM
6

Great summary. Thank you. A while ago, I read a lot of the original documents from the case. The medical crew who arrived, said the woman was not unconscious. They classified her as simply “impaired” or something similar. If you have the time, perhaps you can look that up and include it. And it’s clear that the woman had been “got to” by the radical feminists; as she spouts nothing but “fem-speak”.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 12:11 PM
7

I suggest people actually look at what she posted. She said he should be his 'toy boy'. Not 'anally-raped'. Not even close. Oh yeah. My bad. By "toy boy" she must have meant that Trump would willingly and consensually offer to have romantic & gentle sex with "Big Bubba" 😉😘
/r/MensRights30/05/19 05:16 PM
2

"Interesting, not persuasive" as m'learned friends would say. I have presented hard facts; whilst you have presented nothing but hot-air and conjecture. Exhibit A: A full, complete, unedited and unaltered video of the complete incident in question. https://youtu.be/8UhME8dcOqc?t=29 Exhibit B: An account of the incident in question, from a UK national paper, including the fact that the CPC decided not to prosecute Mr Prescott. You dispute the reliability of my source — The Independent Newspaper. …
/r/MensRights27/05/19 10:43 PM
21

There are millions of Muslim men and boys in the UK, the vast majority of whom, were subject to MGM at birth for non-medical reasons.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 09:12 AM
2

It’s called toothpaste. And I use Colgate total which is anti-microbial. So that kinda defeats your analogy. So you brush the inside of your cheeks and the back of your throat with your toothbrush? Weird. And your girlfriends use a toothbrush and toothpaste to “clean” the inside of their vaginas? Oh dear. Imagine working up a sweat and only using water to clean under your armpits. The internal surface of the foreskin contains no sweat glans. So I’ve never understood the whole “don’t use soap” ar…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:58 AM
35

The BBC have done a couple of articles recently on MGM; but note how they are only covering men who were mutilated for “medical” reasons. They seem to be avoiding the vast majority of men who have been mutilated for no real reason at all.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:50 AM
1

Possibly not so. The electors voting intentions in a general election will be very different. The Conservatives may well end up in an alliance with the Brexit Party; with a Conservative Leader.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:42 AM
16

How does one apply to became an "Intimacy Coordinator"? (Asking for a friend 😉)
/r/MensRights27/05/19 12:34 AM
7

No problem! Many doctors will not have a clue — especially if you live in a country where male genital mutilation has been normalised. I think it's a yeast infection that causes the issue.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:41 PM
5

He's obviously a total cuck for "apologising" and admitting that he views himself as some sort of sexual pervert.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 11:08 PM
21

Oh no I'll never vote for the current Tory party. Not suggesting you do that. I'm suggesting you vote to select the most favourable potential Tory leader who will support men.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:52 PM
8

The interior of the foreskin is a highly sensitive and delicate mucus membrane — just like the inside of your mouth, or the vaginal canal. The medical advice is that you should never use soap of any kind to clean the interior of the penis that is covered by the foreskin, nor the inner foreskin itself. Doing so can upset the delicate bacterial balance of those mucus membranes. Doing so, could result in a bacterial or yeast infection, and it's that that is producing the bad odour. Do you use soap …
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:49 PM
49

You can just join the Conservative Party today, and then you will have a vote on the next Tory leader. So far, 36,000 people have done just that! But that only gives you a vote on the final two candidates; after the Tory MP's have whittled the field down with their votes. https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1132157/Brexit-news-conservative-theresa-may-leadership-election-latest-update-leave-EU-no-deal Just £25pa; or £5pa if you are under 25: https://www.conservatives.com/join
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:36 PM
3

...i do remember at the time the police making a point that it wasn't proportionate response. Nope: https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/no-charges-after-prescott-punch-1972145 North Wales Police sent its report on the incident to the CPS earlier this month. Today, the force said in a statement: ''The Crown Prosecution Service has conducted a careful review of the substantial file of evidence and video material presented by investigators. ''The conclusion in Mr Prescott's case is that, …
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:30 PM
1

Ah... the wonders of Mr Google and his Magic Internet. The truth is to hand: https://youtu.be/8UhME8dcOqc?t=29 Prescott's instant reaction was clearly that — an instant reaction. And proportionate in so far as how was he to know what his assailant had done? Was it acid? Urine? Dog Shit? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-truth-about-prescott-and-that-punch-8722563.html Irvin spoke to Blair, saying: "If we apologise, we will be admitting responsibility." Brown, running the campaig…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:26 PM
9

In the "heat of the moment", and considering his response was pretty instant, the law would find his force "proportionate". Indeed, he was not prosecuted.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 06:35 PM
2

Farage is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic etc. etc — Literally HITLER! LOL /s
/r/MensRights26/05/19 06:33 PM
45

Exactly. Amputating the labia lips of infant girls will reduce their chances of cancer of the vulva by 50%. Good to hear that you support female circumcision!
/r/MensRights22/05/19 07:35 AM
3

Agreed. Their website is just shocking — it's an endless stream of news items about how women are oppressed, raped, abused, discriminated against, underpaid, fat-shamed etc etc.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:55 PM
2

They are actually quite responsive. They have a set complaints procedure, and they will always reply. You can then escalate the complaint if you are not happy. And they do track who is complaining and about what. In the past, my complaints have clearly reached a higher level, and they have actually changed articles and headlines as a result. The more people complain the better — as they are required by law to be impartial etc.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 02:54 PM
2

TIL that putting your life on the line to save others is “macho”.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:36 AM
8

His "defence" is here: https://medium.com/@TonyRobbins/an-open-letter-to-buzzfeed-editors-and-board-of-directors-from-tony-robbins-e78f2c11e8af But of course, for the Twitter mobs, he is already guilty as charged...
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:24 PM
6

I appreciate your enthusiasm for sarcasm, but to become a master you mustn't use /s. Alas, even the Highest Zen Master of Sarcasm is no match for the illiteracy and ignorance of many a Redditor.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:10 AM
3

"My" rapist —that says it all. All those Instagram girls want one. /s
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:01 AM
1

I think it’s photoshopped; not tape.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:37 AM
5

Good points. Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:59 AM
7

Circumcision = MGM In many cases, you are correct. But we need to make a distinction between a true medical circumcision, and male genital mutilation (MGM). In non male genital mutilating societies — such as Norway — only around one in every 17,000 men or boys will ever require and true medical circumcision.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 12:33 AM
9

How can it be considered mutilation if it makes it better? Makes what "better"? There is nothing wrong with a newborn baby's penis.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 12:31 AM
2

They are eating themselves. All white, right-wing women are now to be labeled with "toxic femininity".
/r/MensRights11/05/19 09:31 PM
15

Accountability: Place responsibility solely on the killer, which means avoiding speculative “reasons” or “triggers”, or describing the murder as an uncharacteristic event. Homicides are usually underpinned by a longstanding sense of ownership, coercive control and possessive behaviours: they are not a random event. LOL. Sure — unless it's a woman murdering her husband with a hammer because he no longer wanted a relationship with her. Then suddenly, surprise, surprise; every excuse under the sun …
/r/MensRights09/05/19 04:24 PM
7

Megan Markle was born in California, and her father was Caucasian and her mother is African American. California has a relative low rate of MGM compared to other states (but still high); but it's likely her father has suffered MGM when born. It's likely that during her "dating" phases of her life, she came across men who were most likely not intact, as that is the case for most American males. Indeed, she dated a married a man from the Jewish cultural tradition, and he was almost certainly genit…
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:51 PM
34

Feminism is for feminists; equality is for everyone.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 10:20 AM
5

And note that in a non-Male genital mutilating society such as Norway, just 1 in every 17,000 men will ever require a true medical circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 10:16 AM
3

The police are just informing the complaints about the reality of the situation: The defence can insist on access to the complaint’s phone, and any good defence would always find a reason to get access. There is a long, long history of complaints’ phones exonerating the defendants, and the courts and juries will not ignore that.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:52 AM
1

Can't be sure — but it looks like Mr Photoshop has been having a bit of play-around with the ASOS image. She seems taller and thinner. Perhaps someone with the right skills can investigate further?
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:40 PM
5

Next: Feminists object to "victims" having to submit to a "rape-kit" genital examination.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 04:26 PM
68

”...40 per cent of cases were closed with the marker ‘evidential difficulties – victim does not support action’” Translation: 40% (at least) of the complainants make false rape allegations.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:48 AM
13

“I kick balls” is a clear and obvious reference to physically abusing men by kicking them in their genitals.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:39 AM
4

I wonder what the video that the men recorded actually showed. I’m suspicious that the Guardian does not detail this.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 11:56 AM
80

The detailed graphic of male genitalia they use, which is titled: "The foreskin protects the head of the penis, known as the glans", does not actually show a foreskin at all! You couldn't make it up.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 06:34 PM
2

he started to actually help him. "he" LOL 😉
/r/MensRights17/04/19 04:25 PM
4

Exactly. What has she achieved or done with her life that makes her stand-out or worth listening to? Nothing. She's just the wife of a driven, hard-working, winning man who climbed the long, long ladder to became POTUS. She's just riding on his coat-tails. Pass the sickbag.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 11:05 PM
8

It won’t be long before she’s out: The Femnazis will get to her, and suddenly she’ll have a story all about how he was “abusing” her for years, and she was subject to “coercive control” etc. They’ll be a retrial, and she get “time already served” for manslaughter. Sorry, I meant “person-slaughter” /s
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:54 AM
2

This
/r/MensRights09/04/19 03:57 PM
1

What was sex like when you did have a foreskin — before you decided to have it amputated?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:35 AM
11

Google: foreskin gliding action.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 08:34 AM
2

Fantastic. You just couldn't make such a TV show today.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 04:39 PM
12

The undercurrent to this decision, is that thousands of men (mainly) are convicted of various sexual offences against females on the sole basis of evidence given by the accuser. Such "evidence" has been shown by criminal researchers to be fantastically unreliable. So much so, that in some jurisdictions — such as Scotland — a prosecution can never proceed with only accuser evidence; corroborating evidence is required. Such evidence is even more unreliable where the accuser is a child or juvenile,…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:07 AM
22

So it's still #believewomen, even when the very woman in question no longer "believes" what she originally said. Gawd 'elp us all.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:02 AM
105

The ultimate "coercive and controlling behaviour" is to take someone's life from them because they don't love you.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 06:56 PM
10

...and of course it's all Trump's fault. /s
/r/MensRights02/04/19 05:28 PM
2

Trying putting on play where you have a large penis representing Jessica Valenti and then report back here and tell how you got on...
/r/MensRights30/03/19 12:51 AM
35

So yet another case where they have video evidence proving a false rape allegation — but they prosecute for rape anyway.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 11:37 AM
8

"False allegations of sexual harassment and abuse, though thankfully uncommon, do serious damage to legitimate survivors who need the strength and support of their communities. " Lies. How do you know they are "uncommon" if you believe all the s**t you read online and take it at face-value? And the "serious damage" is done to the wrongly accused.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 05:52 PM
23

Of course! When it’s a man being violent towards a female. But magically, when it’s the other way round, it’s no longer domestic violence! Funny eh?
/r/MensRights26/03/19 02:58 PM
51

No mention of the words “domestic violence” anywhere in the article I see. But well done OP! Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 12:07 PM
29

Vasalgel is waaayyyy better. Just wait a few years. Exactly. It has zero side-effects, and is 100% reversible. It simply blocks the transport of sperm — without stopping the rest of the ejactulatory fluid. It's a simple injection to administer; and another simple injection to reverse. It will revolutionise male/female relationships. No more women stealing sperm from condoms; no more "forgetting" to take the pill. No more men being chained to a lifetime of child-support and alimony because they g…
/r/MensRights26/03/19 01:08 AM
1

LOL how the Guardian actually repeats the footage is slo-mo frame-by-frame.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 11:06 AM
3

Clitoral hood was cut. Nope. Also her labia lips were amputated: "... I have no clitoral hood and only a V shaped scar and the tiniest bit of inner labia they were kind enough to leave behind."
/r/MensRights20/03/19 07:16 PM
2

I will not respond to posts on here And yet, here were are. But at least it got me off this sub Go on then. Naff off. Even when they are open to discussion like I was. The genital mutilation and sexual abuse of infant boys (or girls) is not open to "discussion".
/r/MensRights11/03/19 09:48 PM
6

give a suggestion to seriously slow your roll on this issue No. and everything was normal down there in a couple days Having the most sensitive part of your penis sliced-off for no reason does not leave it in a "normal" condition. thought the hate was ridiculous for such a common practice and routine procedure. Cutting chunks of female genitalia off young girls is a "common practice and routine procedure" in many countries. Happy with that are you? So, all I want to say is, tone it down about a …
/r/MensRights11/03/19 08:41 PM
2

Indeed. But it’s interesting that we have to have that pointed out to us, as some of the genuine feminist daffy nonsense is not much different. 🤪
/r/MensRights10/03/19 12:46 PM
11

FGM is still more deadly and risky. It’s still kills more and has a significantly much higher chance of life long complications. Sure, LOL! Try having an "orgasm" with out a penis. 😉 Here is the reality of male "circumcision" for many men in the world: NSFL: This is a young African male "becoming a man" And here is an 11 year old boy undergoing the same abuse: NSFL: Jump to 14:45 to watch a young African boy having his penis skinned and mutilated. Watch all the way to 16:40 to see the "circumcis…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:16 AM
6

Big thanks. Well done.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 11:17 PM
24

Well the mother did say she didn't want her to go to jail And what did the owner of the foreskin have to say about it? You know — the person whose foreskin was part of his body? ...oh, I know. Not much. He was only a few days old, and is now dead. LOL.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 06:24 PM
7

The OP means that at the top of the article, there are 14 female photographs, and 14 male photographs — 50/50. Yet 73% of the deaths were male. See my comments here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aypxth/bbc_graphic_top_of_page_show_half_the_people/ei2smrw/
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:14 PM
14

Points to note: The headline does not mention that 73% of the dead were male. You can bet every penny you own, that had it been that 73% of the dead were female, the BBC would have made the WHOLE ARTICLE, not just the headline, about "gendered violence", and they would have covered only female deaths and shown only female photographs. Nowhere in the article, does it give you the actual statistic: 27% of the murdered were female and 73% were male. You have to count the dots to get those facts. Th…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:12 PM
9

Exactly. They really don’t get it.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:35 AM
6

Thanks for writing all that out — saved me the time. The female author is barking mad and hasn't a clue.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 12:43 AM
9

Far, far more Male infants, boys and men suffer Male Genital Mutilation in the UK, then women who have been subject to FGM. And remember that MGM is state sanctioned and approved. The National Health Service (NHS) will even mutilate your Male baby for free.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 06:34 PM
8

There is no greater example of "Coercive Control" than to take another person's life, because that person is not doing what you want them to do.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 07:50 PM
8

I'm done with this Translation: I realise that my parents seriously mutilated my genitals just for fun; and I realise that I have done the same to my own sons.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:22 PM
9

You like doing this to helpless little infant boys: https://youtu.be/W2PKdDOjooA
/r/MensRights02/03/19 01:21 PM
11

So you’re a child sex abuser — nice.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 09:57 AM
2

https://circumcision.org/amnesty-international-suppressed-debate/
/r/MensRights23/02/19 06:20 PM
5

“...the judges said it was not in the public interest that a person could wound another for no good reason”. "The Court of Appeal have ruled that the consent of an individual to body modifications performed by a practitioner who has no medical training or qualifications provides no defence if serious bodily harm is caused”. But of course if you don’t and can’t give consent because you are a newborn male infant, then that’s OK then. 🙄
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:13 AM
3

“Ms Walker, 20, who is studying astrophysics and African-American studies” 🙄
/r/MensRights13/02/19 02:44 AM
15

OR i can have a different opinion from you without having some underlying ''traumatic'' mindset on it... Confirmed: Suppression of infant genital mutilation trauma.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:03 PM
14

Yeah i dont really care, Sex feels great. My penis is cleaner. My penis looks better. Doesnt look like an earthworm. not mad at all. Confirmed: Deep rooted anger at his parents for mutilating his genitals.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 10:59 PM
3

Let’s be clear; there is no such thing as a “poorly-performed circumcision” any more than there is a “poorly-performed rape”.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 10:59 AM
2

No wonder there are no reliable figures on the number of Male genital mutilation deaths, as in the USA, you can’t report a death as due to “circumcision” — it can only be categorised as”blood loss” or “infection”.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 09:49 AM
9

This woman is an idiot. Alas, I don't think she is. Rather, I suspect she is a real man-hater, and has no compassion or empathy. She is just an empty vessel, and I don't think she even cares about women or girl really.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 01:14 AM
31

From her recent Twitter post: “Guys and some girls please give it a break with the male circumcision stuff. I am an anti fgm activist. I defend Fannies not foreskin.”
/r/MensRights06/02/19 08:42 PM
15

She’s trying to come to grips with the fact that her parents are child sex abusers, and her brothers all have mutilated genitals.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:48 PM
5

Hmmm... well I guess this will mean that ASDA will have the right to move women from the shop floor to the warehouse when they are short of staff — and they can't complain about it, because it's the "same job". LOL.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:01 AM
1

Nah, it is because the police are scared of being labelled racist. That is the main reason for sure! In France they have compulsory genital exams of all children annually. Hundreds of people have been prosecuted for FGM.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:43 AM
1

Agreed. I suspect that one of the reasons the authorities drag their feet over FGM prosecutions, is that they know that MGM prosecutions will be next.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 10:13 AM
11

I’ve not posted this to debate Roe v Wade. Rather it’s the false rape allegation made to gain political advantage (sounds familiar?) that needs highlighting.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:58 PM
5

“Pledge $10 or more per month: I will curse ten men in your honour.” Her actual Patreon account is full of man-hatred.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 01:28 PM
2

The entire incident was caught on camera. Except of course it wasn’t. Where are the shots of him lining-up to get his hot dog? Where are the shots of the incident unfolding? Fake News
/r/MensRights31/01/19 01:13 PM
3

Sam Harris was born to parents who identified as Jewish, and so almost certainly they mutilated his genitals by amputating his foreskin when he was an infant. Despite all his intelligence and learning, Sam Harris is subject to the normal human failings. So no doubt, like most genitally mutilated men, he has not comes to terms with the serious damage done to his penis.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:58 PM
1

FGM is caused by feminism. MGM starts, because very occasionally, a young man will develop phimosis — where the foreskin cannot retract. So a medical circumcision is required, with a flint knife, if that's all they have. When this happens to a brave warrior, hunter, prince, king etc., then all the other men start to have themselves circumcised; or indeed their sons circumcised, in order to "be like" the admired person and/or ingratiate themselves with those in charge. This has happened across ti…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:32 AM
1

It’s the same thing with the phrase toxic masculinity. It doesn’t mean EVERYTHING about masculinity is toxic, it is referring to a particular subset of characteristics that fit a certain criteria, and not everyone who is masculine is toxicly masculine. It’s the same thing with the phrase toxic Judaism. It doesn’t mean EVERYTHING about Jews is toxic, it is referring to a particular subset of characteristics that fit a certain criteria, and not everyone who is Jewish is toxicly Jewish. Feeling a t…
/r/MensRights28/01/19 12:19 AM
1

You made an interesting point that I had not considered. Thank you. What is interesting, is that the Femnazis (literally) will try and use such contortions and interpretations to defame and attack those who have so clearly exposed their evil.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:40 PM
1

social expirements ethics standards are pretty tight across the board. Interesting point — but it wasn’t an “experiment” either! That would be an absurd and deliberately distorted view of it. It was totally acceptable and moral journalistic action to expose appalling hatred. These people have been caught red-handed, literally publishing (or agreeing to publish), pure Nazi ideology, from the very mouth and pen of Adolf Hitler himself. No wonder they are screeching and wailing, and trying every tr…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:17 PM
6

Exactly. It's not "satire", "fraud", a "hoax", a "stunt" or "research data fabrication". Rather what they did was legitimate journalistic investigation and enquiry, using perfectly reasonable and proportional methods, to expose the real fraud and data fabrication.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:36 PM
5

er... Jesus wasn’t “American” either — he was from the Roman providence of Judea in the Middle East — and yet you follow his “laws” 24/7. LOL 😆
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:52 AM
8

Except it is the parents call? Yes. You are right. Silly me. The parents have the "right" to hack of chunks of healthy infant flesh and throw it in the bin because reasons.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:22 PM
11

Not my child, not my call. “Not my genitals, not my call.” Fixed that for ya 😉
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:39 AM
14

And the parents made that choice... So you’d be OK with them making that “choice” for their little infant girl? Having her Labia lips cut off, and sold to a cosmetics company that makes facecream for men?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:21 AM
8

And don’t forget that Amnesty International supports Male Genital Mutilation.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 09:06 AM
6

Do you HONESTLY think that there's a company going around and chilling in doc offices just waiting to pick up some fresh sliced foreskin ? er... https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&ei=PtBCXPG7AdCejLsP_7uhkAk&q=companies+buy+foreskins&oq=companies+buy+foreskins&gs_l=psy-ab.12...0.0..3772...0.0..0.0.0.......0......gws-wiz.ulnS1zanJ1Q
/r/MensRights19/01/19 07:24 AM
8

Cloned from what?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:53 AM
2

Thanks! I’m going to give it a go.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:52 PM
19

It is a video about men helping each other. What is the threat? Toxic Judaism: It is a video about jews helping each other. What is the threat? Toxic Islam: It is a video about muslims helping each other. What is the threat? Toxic black people: It is a video about black people helping each other. What is the threat? Feeling uncomfortable yet?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:30 PM
1

in arguments of medical word definitions, appeals to the authoritiy of medical dictionaries is sufficient Nope. Truth is only ever sufficient. I see you have still not commented on the video, that refutes your claim that amputation of the external glans clitoris is not to be compared with amputation of the Male foreskin.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:32 PM
2

Yes. And co-working is now a commoditised and marginal business. Hard to make a nett profit on a day to day basis. Plus if you are a lonely post-wall woyman, then you want to meet men, not avoid them.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 05:55 AM
1

Nice try 😉 We are past the false definitions of clitoridectomy — clearly you are not interested in exactitude and correct understanding; rather you prefer the fallacy of “appeal to authority”: The UN says “X” and the dictionaries say “X” so it must be true. You are in denial of established medical terminology, in which removal of the external clitoris is known as ‘clitoridectomy.’ Correct. Their definition is clearly false and mine is true. It’s interesting how you are not interested in truth. T…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:58 AM
1

Ooooooo!! The “UN” eh 🙄 Here’s your homework. Watch this video by a Senior Lecturer in Pathology, and tell us why you — someone who “works in medicine” — is right, and he is wrong. https://youtu.be/DD2yW7AaZFw Ken McGrath, Senior Lecturer in Pathology at the Faculty of Health, Auckland University of Technology and Member of the New Zealand Institute of Medical Laboratory Scientists discusses his research into the neural anatomy of the human penis and the physical damages caused by circumcision. …
/r/MensRights08/01/19 08:25 PM
1

comparing circumcision to clitoridectomy FAKE NEWS. There is no such medical or genital mutation procedure correctly known as a “clitoridectomy”. The female clitoris is large and mainly internal. It surrounds the vaginal canal, and only a tiny portion of it is external. If you attempted a “clitoridectomy” it would kill the woman, or at least she would have no genitals left — not even her vaginal canal. Still, as you claim: ”I work in medicine, was the top of my A&P class” LOL! 😂🙄 You clearly don…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 07:36 AM
3

Yep — "circumcising" is a real bunch of fun eh? 😉 Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.co…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 08:35 PM
1

In this case, it seems less that she killed him because he was controlling. It seems she killed him because he was unfaithful (ie ironically because she could not control his behavior). Ha! You hit the nail on the head. Exactly. It was her who was trying to control him. He didn't love her, and was off with other women — big deal. But she didn't like that, so she took the ultimate control over him: She Took His Life.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 11:40 PM
4

But she still loves him! LOL. You have to be a total muppet to believe this nonsense. She actually went back to him after they were separated.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:42 PM
1

Good point! But of course us humans find it hard sometimes to do what is best for ourselves. Just as far too many men end up marrying in the CRAZY-HOT zone.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 08:31 PM
1

“...beings from another planet” This is visceral racial and sexual hatred. No less.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 07:09 PM
0

I like this. It's totally true. I like truth.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 06:54 PM
4

Interesting. But I live in an area, filled with well educated and wealthy women with a feminist outlook. I see them with their kids in cafés and on the streets. Sometimes I chat to them, and talk about their kids. They have tried everything they can to bring the kids up equally regardless of their gender. But they see how early on in their childs’ lives just how powerful the differences between boys and girls are. One mother I spoke to, had a three-year-old boy, who is completely obsessed with c…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 11:40 AM
9

embrace the term "toxic masculinity." How about “NO”? Pass the sick bucket 🤮🤮🤮 Should Jews “embrace the term toxic Judaism?” Should Muslims “embrace the term toxic Islam?” There is nothing “toxic” about men or masculinity.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 11:29 AM
4

That is GOOD NEWS and a real step in the right direction. You have to jump through a lot of political acceptance hoops to get a gong. No doubt though — some feminists are wailing somewhere right now.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:32 PM
3

I looked for it, but couldn't find it. 😏
/r/MensRights29/12/18 06:27 AM
8

This interesting section appears at the end: "Indeed, when researchers strip away stereotypes and expectations, there isn’t much difference in the basic behaviors of men and women. Time diary studies, for example, find that men enjoy caring for their children as much as women do. And differences in emotional displays between boys and girls are small, according to a 2013 meta-analysis (Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 139, No. 4), and not always in the stereo-typical direction. Adolescent boys, for e…
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:56 AM
23

Exactly! The very language itself is demeaning and potential psychology harmful. Imagine: "Research finds that traditional Judaism is, on the whole, harmful" "Research finds that traditional black identity is, on the whole, harmful" or God forbid: "Research finds that modern feminism is, on the whole, harmful"
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:55 AM
3

But I really don’t care. logical and functional rarely has a point with society. Not within your "society" it would seem. However, most of the rest of society hold such things in high esteem. This is a fantastic video on the subject — presented by Ryan McAllister, Ph.D. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I
/r/MensRights28/12/18 09:14 PM
3

I’m not arguing any of those points whatsoever. Well, here are some more "points" for you to "not argue" over 😂😘 There are no "benefits" to slicing off chunks of healthy, functional human tissue: The foreskin has evolved over millions of years, and every male (and female) mammal has one. Like all of the human body — it's pretty impressive!: Functions of the Foreskin A list sourced from medical publications. Referenced links here What does the male foreskin do? Foreskin... Protects the infant fro…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 08:12 PM
4

That is not circumcising. Again. Proving my point. Yep — "circumcising" is a real bunch of fun eh? 😉 Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 08:04 PM
4

"My gut reaction" — LOL
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:01 PM
7

IT IS NOT GENITAL MUTILATION. Stop this fucking nonsense Sure, LOL! Try having an "orgasm" with out a penis. 😉 Here is the reality of male "circumcision" for many men in the world: NSFL: This is a young African male "becoming a man" And here is an 11 year old boy undergoing the same abuse: NSFL: Jump to 14:45 to watch a young African boy having his penis skinned and mutilated. Watch all the way to 16:40 to see the "circumcision" NSFL: More abuse NSFL: Mass sexual abuse & mutilation of boys Milli…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:23 PM
5

the obvious Jew-hating material that gets forwarded around. It's important to note, that the comic series this character originates from, has numerous different characters. The comic attacks many different genital mutilators: white Christians, doctors, black Africans, Muslims as well as Jewish people: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mgmbill/sets/72157628381790273 But the context is never shown when it is presented as an example of anti-semitism — only the Jewish genital mutilator is shown. I think…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:22 PM
3

it’s not the same thing as genital mutilation in women. Sure, LOL! Try having an "orgasm" with out a penis. 😉 Here is the reality of male "circumcision" for many men in the world: NSFL: This is a young African male "becoming a man" And here is an 11 year old boy undergoing the same abuse: NSFL: Jump to 14:45 to watch a young African boy having his penis skinned and mutilated. Watch all the way to 16:40 to see the "circumcision" NSFL: More abuse NSFL: Mass sexual abuse & mutilation of boys Millio…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:14 AM
-5

You haven’t been on Reddit long, have you dear? 🤩😜
/r/MensRights27/12/18 05:18 PM
12

”They said the findings could have implications for perinatal services, which traditionally focus on identifying and treating post-natal depression in mothers.” So who gives a s**t about men being depressed; but as soon as mens’ depression is affecting women, then suddenly there are “implications”.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 04:50 PM
10

Be attractive — don't be unattractive!
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:29 PM
7

Orange man bad.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:29 PM
7

TIL that patting a women on their bottom is "rape". LOL. QED
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:24 PM
70

a private conversation and his apology could have fixed everything Exactly. They are all adults. It's not like he raped them in the bathroom, or stabbed them. Everybody was likely just a bit drunk and he said something "sexist". Or maybe he patted one of them on the bottom.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 01:56 PM
3

Wrong. The medical and religious people want to con the public into thinking that MGM is “debatable”. That way, they can continue doing it for ever, whist seeming “reasonable” on the surface. Don’t fall for the con — they are all child sex-abusers.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 04:33 PM
3

Good luck with that. People don’t mutilate their infant boys for logical reasons — and you are not going to stop them with “logic”. And at its core MGM is performed with malice — the mutilators make good money out of it; and the religious nuts will try and kill you if try and take their knives away.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 04:30 PM
2

Those who don't respond to reason and facts were never going to change their mind anyway. Humans are complex and varied creatures. They respond, adapt and learn in many different ways. You are confusing your own perspective and approach with the rest of humanity. A basic, and common error.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 02:24 PM
4

Saying that there ARE no benefits makes you sound like an anti-vaxxer denying evidence. You are confusing the medical and scientific results of hacking-off healthy and function chunks of the human body and throwing them in the bin with "benefits". With your "logic", if you cut your nose off, you would have the "benefit" of now having a zero chance of developing cancer of the nose.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 02:01 PM
5

I'd prefer to argue against the practice of circumcision when nothing goes wrong. LOL! "Nothing goes wrong" — apart from the fact you now have a mutilated penis.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:59 PM
7

You might get more people to see your point of view if you dial down the sarcasm a notch. Ah yes! If only people were logical, reasonable and responded to facts eh?
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:58 PM
8

Fuck off. Dear or dear! Someone can't handle the fact their parents mutilated their genitals when they were an infant for no good reason. 😂
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:40 PM
6

confirmation bias. Well, someone is suffering from that. LOL.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:39 PM
9

...Not helpful. Sounds to me like you are being sexist and misogynistic! Why are you denying girls all the wonderful benefits of female circumcision? Female Circumcision Does Not Always Reduce Sexual Experiences "International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown: Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01550.x/abstract "The Journal of Sexual Me…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:36 PM
7

you'll get nothing but emotional hand waving if you dare mention that circumcision isn't a net loss... We'll here's some of that "emotional hand waving" — cleverly disguised as medical facts and research. 😉 Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:34 PM
9

acts give benefits and detriments to both sides There are no "benefits" to slicing off chunks of healthy, functional human tissue: The foreskin has evolved over millions of years, and every male (and female) mammal has one. Like all of the human body — it's pretty impressive!: Functions of the Foreskin A list sourced from medical publications. Referenced links here What does the male foreskin do? Foreskin... Protects the infant from contaminants, infection, and meatal stenosis. The foreskin is f…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:33 PM
6

I just don't think presenting it a way that equates the cons as being equivalent to FGM is honest or helpful. Sure, LOL! Try having an "orgasm" with out a penis. 😉 Here is the reality of male "circumcision" for many men in the world: NSFL: This is a young African male "becoming a man" And here is an 11 year old boy undergoing the same abuse: NSFL: Jump to 14:45 to watch a young African boy having his penis skinned and mutilated. Watch all the way to 16:40 to see the "circumcision" NSFL: More abu…
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:32 PM
20

I have two agree with you here, when my little girl was just two days old, we had her labia lips sliced off because that reduces the chance of cancer of the vulva by 50%. So much better to do it when they are newborns!
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:10 AM
1

The UK is not leaving the ECHR — European Court of human rights. That is separate to the EU.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 05:13 AM
3

It's all interesting stuff for sure. But one would not be suing the courts or the judges. Rather, you would be using overriding human rights law to declare that the gender discriminatory laws and instructions in favour of women, are against human rights laws. It's been done plenty of times before in other areas.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 07:44 PM
9

Interesting, thank you. But I still wonder what would happen if it went all the way to the UK Supreme Court, and then onto the ECHR.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 04:53 PM
21

In the UK, there surely will be some lawyers who will challenge their male client's imprisonment on the basis of unequal application of the law? Let's see.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 03:05 PM
28

Nice. Now I can eat happily in the knowledge that a woman’s place is in the kitchen 😏
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:16 AM
13

"Feminism" is a belief-system, political movement, doctrine and ideology. You can no more discriminate or "insult" it as you could discriminate or insult capitalism or socialism. And if his crime was to insult women, then why are they specifying that "feminists" must be on his show?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 08:52 PM
4

I think I'm going to go read her actual paper because the presentation of her ideas in the article makes no fucking sense. Good luck with that... 😏
/r/MensRights23/12/18 05:45 PM
-1

Orange man bad.
/r/MensRights19/12/18 07:42 AM
1

Be attractive — don't be unattractive!
/r/MensRights16/12/18 08:58 PM
5

'Let the jury consider their verdict,' the King said, for about the twentieth time that day. 'No, no!' said the Queen. 'Sentence first—verdict afterwards.' 'Stuff and nonsense!' said Alice loudly. 'The idea of having the sentence first!' 'Hold your tongue!' said the Queen, turning purple. 'I won't!' said Alice. Off with her head!' the Queen shouted at the top of her voice. Nobody moved. — Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, by Lewis Carroll
/r/MensRights16/12/18 07:07 PM
5

hurt victims of his crimes. So already guilty eh? Why bother with a trial? Burn the witch!
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:39 PM
6

Leaking emails to sway public opinion is the opposite of due process. But endless women claiming on Twitter (with zero evidence) that Weinstein "forced" them to let him give them oral sex is due process then eh?
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:39 PM
3

Ah yes. Burn the witch! 🙄
/r/MensRights16/12/18 10:54 AM
7

You aren't worth engaging with. And yet, here you are. 🙄
/r/MensRights15/12/18 06:57 PM
1

Thank you for the heads up! ...or rather not 😏
/r/MensRights14/12/18 08:05 PM
22

TIL I learn't that objecting to a 15 year old boy licking his mother's anus is "narrowminded" LOL! https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7961873/mum-sexual-activity-son-spared-jail/
/r/MensRights12/12/18 06:31 PM
2

Great article. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 12:02 PM
1

The top, is it comment?
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:49 AM
8

This notion that circumcision is more dangerous as older they get is a lie. Indeed — except of course when the same genital mutilators are "persuading" adult black African men to have their penises mutilated; and then suddenly "VMMC" (Voluntary medical male circumcision) is "easy", "painless", "quick" etc.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 05:45 PM
3

How many working men put their pay into a joint bank account with their wives who choose to stay at home and look after the kids? Is that counted as female income?
/r/MensRights11/12/18 07:32 AM
15

Interesting interview, thank you. She blames religion for the oppression of women to a large extent; of course the interviewer says nothing, because she is committing a sin against feminist orthodoxy, where it is the evil patriarchy that is to blame for everything.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:41 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights07/12/18 01:02 AM
1

ELI5 please?
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:23 PM
7

Do they rape, choke, and hit the dildos? You haven't seen some of the porn I have ducky! 😘
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:10 PM
7

a dildo; they’re not anthropomorphised Exactly. To a feminist, a man does not exist. They want to "exterminate" them — at least in their minds, and imagination — and just have the only piece of them they consider useful: Their erect penis. Or maybe even exterminate them in reality... Israeli Jewish Women holding a sign that says "Boys to the Gas Chambers"
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:54 PM
1

its hard to tell what they are even talking about and seem to be nearly gibberish. QED. "Gender Studies" is gibberish.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 01:53 PM
783

But dildos are OK eh?
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:58 AM
5

So you are claiming that the Washington Post can publish an article — but that’s “...not the Washington Post” LOL 😂 Congratulations — you have won a Gold Medal in the 2018 Opression Olympics Mental Gymnastics Category. As you say: “...why read any further?” 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:50 AM
25

Exactly. Suck it up sweetie. And elsewhere she whines: "What brought my career in politics to an end was being slut-shamed so viciously, with no ability to come back and stand up for myself," she told 7.30. And she's concerned that it's a common tactic used against women in politics. "It's almost used as a method of torture," she said. "I am gutted that the willingness of certain individuals and certain parts of the media to defame me on vexatious and unfounded accusations has caused so much per…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:38 AM
11

The only reason she is getting concerned is because black men are being targeted and expelled. She doesn't care about white men, or men in general.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:01 PM
5

LOL! Jump to here and answer 8 of the 10 questions correctly, and they email you a certificate 😂 You can enter any name and organisation you wish. My organisation said: "Feminism is Cancer".
/r/MensRights05/12/18 07:10 PM
7

In one way, this is very helpful. Next time you get call-out for using the phrase "Fem-Nazi", just post/show this.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:44 PM
3

Amazing. Wonderful. Just the sort of real action that get's things done, and the point made. Now let's wait and see how long it takes Youtube to remove it for "reasons".
/r/MensRights04/12/18 09:26 PM
20

Ha! Spot on. Also, another study reveals: "Muslims are happier at work when there are fewer Jews". "Asians are happier at work when there are fewer blacks". etc. etc. until you get arrested /s
/r/MensRights03/12/18 07:48 PM
2

I agree with your points — thanks. But note that: Women in the UK receive shorter sentences for the same crime on average then men do. Women are allowed to wear their own clothes in prisons in the UK, unlike men. And they have other privileges that men do not get. There is now a substantial campaign in the UK, backed by many MPs, to remove prison as an option for all not-violent female offenders because "reasons".
/r/MensRights03/12/18 07:16 PM
3

“Five years” = 2 years after remission for good behaviour and the “women should never be in prison” factor. Plus, unlike men, she’ll be in a cushy jail somewhere, allowed to wear her own clothes, and take kitting classes.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 01:27 PM
3

Exactly
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:26 AM
5

“For a variety of reasons, most justified , some unjustified, men accused of sexual impropriety in today’s “me-too” climate are presumed to be guilty by the court of public opinion. Emotions bypass due-process, people choose sides, and the social media wars begin.” eh? What’s he saying here? What are the “justifiable” “reasons” that men are presumed guilty? He sounds to me just like yet another SJW caught in the web of his own making.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:21 AM
3

Let's leave it there. It's good to know I help you see things in a different light! Peace.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 07:18 PM
5

You still haven't broken me yet. Maybe not — but you're starting to think about it eh? I'm still not convinced I'm missing out. You will never be able to compare having a foreskin to not having one, because you were denied that choice at birth when it was amputated from you without your consent. And your cognitive dissonance, defence of your identity, self-denial, and your lack of imagination, will most likely mean you will always live in a fantasy world for the rest of your life about your peni…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 06:50 PM
4

You'd have to try harder for that. Here you go ducky 😘 Male "circumcision" is terribly damaging: The foreskin has evolved over millions of years, and every male (and female) mammal has one. Like all of the human body — it's pretty impressive!: Functions of the Foreskin A list sourced from medical publications. Referenced links here What does the male foreskin do? Foreskin... Protects the infant from contaminants, infection, and meatal stenosis. The foreskin is fused to the head of the penis in i…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 06:42 PM
7

...neo-natal medical procedure Sure — dream on. LOL! 😉 Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://onlinelibrary.wil…
/r/MensRights01/12/18 06:32 PM
3

Your parents sexually abused you (that’s what penis mutilation is), just to show you how much they loved you 😆
/r/MensRights01/12/18 05:24 PM
3

but what you're not gonna do is call us mutilated u/qaezec — you have a mutilated penis. Take a look: you have a big chunk of it missing, and a scar. 😂
/r/MensRights01/12/18 04:42 PM
8

"Describing herself as a local activist, Esther Lieber called the 'anti-semitic' event 'appalling', and said she would be protesting it for 'human rights and equality'." You can't make it up.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:24 PM
15

How can the judge claim that the law “tolerates” MGM? It’s either legal or illegal.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:02 AM
4

Now the "victim" will have to be "re-traumatised" not once, but twice. /s
/r/MensRights27/11/18 01:25 AM
4

You don't have to diminish womens issues to talk about mens. And where have I done that exactly? It's you that has diminished mens issues. You haven't a clue. All you have read is the pro-circ propaganda from the feminist lobby. Here are some hard facts from the front line. Take a careful read: Female Circumcision Does Not Always Reduce Sexual Experiences "International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown: Female genital cutting in this group …
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:35 PM
6

You realize circumcision is done in extremely sterile environments right? Sure, LOL! Try having an "orgasm" with out a penis. 😉 Here is the reality of male "circumcision" for many men in the world: NSFL: This is a young African male "becoming a man" And here is an 11 year old boy undergoing the same abuse: NSFL: Jump to 14:45 to watch a young African boy having his penis skinned and mutilated. Watch all the way to 16:40 to see the "circumcision" NSFL: More abuse NSFL: Mass sexual abuse & mutilat…
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:32 PM
3

Of course you can! Facts belong to everyone — please spread the word. I got an original list from elsewhere on the web, and then added to it.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 02:28 PM
12

Well thank you very much — you are welcome. Hopefully you can inform yourself and join the growing intactivist community. It's not your fault, it's the deliberate obscuration and lies from the feminist and SJW lobby that has led to such terrible ignorance. What a very un-Reddit like conversation! 😂
/r/MensRights24/11/18 11:48 PM
12

Women who have no clitoris cannot enjoy having sex, unlike circumcised men who can Sure, LOL! Try having an "orgasm" with out a penis. 😉 Here is the reality of male "circumcision" for many men in the world: NSFL: This is a young African male "becoming a man" And here is an 11 year old boy undergoing the same abuse: NSFL: Jump to 14:45 to watch a young African boy having his penis skinned and mutilated. Watch all the way to 16:40 to see the "circumcision" NSFL: More abuse NSFL: Mass sexual abuse …
/r/MensRights24/11/18 10:48 PM
11

...fgm has more severe effects. You haven' a clue. All you have read is the pro-circ propaganda from the feminist lobby. Here are some hard facts from the front line. Take a careful read: Female Circumcision Does Not Always Reduce Sexual Experiences "International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology" — a peer reviewed journal of international renown: Female genital cutting in this group of women did not attenuate sexual feelings: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.0155…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 10:46 PM
19

...circumcision does not have as large ramifications. Sure — dream on. LOL! 😉 Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: h…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 10:00 PM
12

If I had the time, I would start some sort of action against the BBC for sexism and acting against their charter etc. Not so hard to do, especially as the licence fee is compulsory if you have a TV or watch BBC iPlayer. That, and set-up a clone website that filters out all the endless feminist drivel.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 09:41 PM
4

Thanks. Great post. Cuts through all the crap. As always, just imagine if the genders were reversed: Feminists would be bleating that women are forced to repress their real state of anxiety and depression by the patriarchy, and that their higher suicide levels “prove” that they are suffering more.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 10:36 AM
3

“...wasted the time of gardaí and other services” Really? They caught a criminal didn’t they? Her.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 06:38 AM
51

According to the judge, this is not a federal issues, and states are not going to ban MGM, so they will probably all just ban FGM separately. You are correct, thank you. I have commented about this here. But it "opens the gates" to challenge to those states laws, as those themselves are unconstitutional as they do not protect all genders equally.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:36 AM
25

After a careful reading of the judgment, it seems that the ruling is more nuanced: It say that the Federal law against FGM is unconstitutional, as that FGM is a states issue, and the US government has no right to enact laws against violence that are not a federal issue. But it "opens the gates" to challenge to those states laws, as those themselves are unconstitutional as they do not protect all genders equally.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:34 AM
202

This is big, big news. The feminist lobby is going to go nuts, and what is the really only real solution? To ban ALL genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:14 AM
4

Brian D. Earp has tweeted about this — but links to Twitter are not allowed here I think.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:13 AM
32

Don't imagine for one, tiny minute that the feminist cabal at the BBC have not done this on purpose to attack men, yet again. And it's on the front page of the BBC website, where there is of course, zero mention of International Men's Day.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 04:13 PM
10

You can only do so much with a bunch of straight white men from privileged backgrounds ...such as creating Western Civilisation, putting men on the moon, inventing vaccines, nuclear power stations, the motor car, the contraceptive pill, the Sistine Chapel etc etc.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 09:33 AM
18

Many thanks for posting this. Note that the article in tucked neatly and safely away on the BBC website's "Northern Ireland News" page — safe from the evil patriarchy's prying eyes! The BBC pull this trick once every few months — they stick-up a "pro-men" article hidden away somewhere on their website, so that can pull-out some fake stats down the line showing they are covering "mens issues".
/r/MensRights17/11/18 10:23 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 03:22 PM
20

Of course, if he had “successfully” mutilated the little boys penis, then there would be no charges at all!
/r/MensRights17/11/18 08:53 AM
5

They are asking for submissions: ”What is the effect of the following on men and boys’ mental health: - Gender stereotyping in childhood - expectations around work” So those are the first two questions in that section. They are pushing the narrative that men have mental health issues because they did not wear dresses when they were children, and that they want to do naughty “masculine” jobs such as fighting fires and digging up roads.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:26 AM
207

This is serious, high-level criticism, from a senior female official, that will be difficult for even the most hardened feminist to counteract. ...not that that will stop them giving it a go of course. Let's see how the BBC tackle it (if at all).
/r/MensRights16/11/18 11:55 PM
25

Notice how she then sexually assaults him by saying to him ”I love you really”. Then she rapes him by touching his arm without consent.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 10:37 AM
2

Who would of thought eh? You win a Nobel Prize! 😀
/r/MensRights14/11/18 10:26 AM
6

there is no rape accusation in the article. Wrong: Mr Patterson replied (the defence lawyer) : 'No one seeks to argue that the line wasn't crossed, the issue is whether it was rape.' The whole case is that he raped her because she did not "consent" to having sex with a police officer.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 09:56 PM
1

No, silly; they mean sewage workers. /s
/r/MensRights12/11/18 10:42 AM
1

And that is the truth.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:44 AM
10

He nails it: "I’m not hearing what you think, I’m hearing how you are able to represent the ideology you were taught. And it’s not that interesting, because I don’t know anything about you — I could replace you with someone else who thinks the same way, and that means you’re not here. That’s what it means, it’s not pleasant. So you are not integrating the specifics of your personal experience with what you’ve been taught, to synthesise something that is genuine and surprising — and engaging in a…
/r/MensRights09/11/18 09:18 PM
1

Evidence? Or are you just a racist troll, attacking black peoples’ culture?
/r/MensRights05/11/18 09:48 AM
2

Don’t bet on it! I predict that will happen 😀👍
/r/MensRights05/11/18 09:47 AM
18

Every "circumcision" is a botch.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 10:01 PM
9

er... that still makes it a false rape allegation.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 10:52 AM
5

She has admitted it was a false rape allegation. But don’t forget folks: You still have to “believe” her. You see, women who have been raped often retract because reasons.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 02:48 AM
0

Just replace the word "men" with "Jews" and see how you feel. If it gives you a little shiver and a tight feeling in your throat; then that tells you all you need to know.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:56 PM
17

Your comment is discriminatory against paragraphs. 😀
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:55 AM
12

”I thought you were better than this MSNBC” The mainstream media propagate fake news like this the whole time.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:50 AM
4

You’re awesome +1
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:44 AM
1

How old are? 12?
/r/MensRights31/10/18 01:59 AM
82

The female journalist calls these tweets “silly”. They are no such thing. These people are deadly serious in their hatred of men and white people. And this hatred is leaching from the campuses into the world outside.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 05:06 PM
1

Exactly!
/r/MensRights29/10/18 04:51 PM
11

You hit the nail on the head. Thank you. Women are analysed and medicalised; men are demonised.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:33 PM
2

He's spot-on. But remember, he is the same guy who has zero compassion for infant boys when it comes to mutilating their genitals.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 09:19 PM
12

Another mangina blue-pilled male feminist bites the dust. He shoveled the shit with his support of #metoo, and now he’s eating it. Maybe others will learn from his mistakes and wake up.
/r/MensRights22/10/18 04:05 AM
1

Interesting, but not persuasive, as the lawyers say. There are plenty of good judges who believe in true equality, it’s not a hopeless cause. And you one only need one or two cases to go in our favour, and things would start to shift.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 01:42 PM
1

You and /u/Consilio_et_Animis are both naive if you think misandry is going to be policed as hard as misogyny just because both are considered hate crimes. Not an unfair point; yet history is replete with the courts making decisions that go-against the flow, and stick to the law. Judges can get a kick out of that, as it enables them to wield their power. Plus, people are starting to launch private prosecutions (in the UK) against false rape accusers and male genital mutilation. If it's going to …
/r/MensRights21/10/18 05:28 AM
2

You can find the book on Amazon, and then search the whole book by clicking "look inside" and using the search box on the LHS. I did this, and searched for "abortion"; but I can't see it saying she did it because she did not want a baby boy.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 05:20 AM
6

”Alan is completing a Masters in human services to become a counsellor” Translation: He’s swallowed the feminist Kool-Aid and been taught to hate himself and his masculinity.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 02:42 PM
16

And of course the article is written by a woman! There is talk in the UK of making hatred of woman a “hate crime”. And they are looking at making hatred of men a “hate crime” also. Bring both on I say — because I think it will help men more than woman: The phrase “toxic masculinity” it clearly hateful, just in the same way that “toxic Jewishness” is or “toxic homosexuality”.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 02:38 PM
37

See how it’s always white women in these cases?
/r/MensRights19/10/18 02:36 PM
12

Actually, many lifeboats left half-empty with only women and children on them — men were prevented from getting on them at all!
/r/PussyPass18/10/18 05:07 PM
35

I just can't even click on the link. These people are really such loonies.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 01:39 AM
10

Ah yes: the American Academy of Pediatrics LOL 😀 According to the AAP — they are not pro-circumcision. Their wording was very careful — they don't recommend it, but they do justify access to it. And later in the report they state: “...health benefits are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision.” http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/585 http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756 And yet Dr. Andrew L. Freedman, one of the senior members of the "task force" o…
/r/MensRights17/10/18 11:53 PM
5

*"...women and girls are systematically oppressed and exploited by men and boys." How are boys exploiting women? What daffy nonsense.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 03:12 PM
37

Totally nuts — they already have the Girl Scouts, which only admit girls, unlike the Boy Scouts, that admit boys and girls LOL. Barking, barking mad.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:12 PM
5

The media use that photograph of a boy being genitality mutilated a lot. You can see clearly the expression of agony on his face as he is being tortured.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:42 PM
3

I support Mike B 100%, because he has done far, far more than I or 99.99% of other readers of this sub, in the fight against MGM. What Mike B needs is volunteers and help. Why not see what you can offer rather than being negative?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:27 PM
29

Oh dear, a scientist presenting verifiable facts and data, how disgusting. Burn the witch!
/r/MensRights01/10/18 12:34 PM
16

It’s just amazing that someone can write such an endless load of drivel trying to justify murder.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 08:34 PM
41

And if you are not a “feminist”, then by implication, you are in favour of mass rape and genocide.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 12:54 PM
4

Always thought the same. Have to agree with you. Well done.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:33 AM
2

Great article, thanks. Of course the whole idea of hacking off a healthy, functioning part of the human body and throwing it in the trash can, and then claiming a "medical benefit" is absurd. If I cut your nose off, you won't get cancer of the nose, because you don't have a nose anymore.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:42 PM
4

But ordinary woman know different. In the UK, female jurors were brought in, because so many men were letting off women with murder, theft, embezzlement etc.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:07 PM
6

And then they have articles wondering why girls are becoming more depressed and self-harming 🙄
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:00 PM
-1

Awwwww... what’s the matter darling? Shall I call you a wammmbulance? 😘
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:52 PM
2

I’m just waiting for the feminists to start ranting about how it’s not fair that men’s bodies are allowed to be admired but not women’s. You know it’s coming..,
/r/MensRights20/09/18 04:07 AM
4

It's anti-Semitc to group all "Jews" together and assign some "magical" silencing power to them — as you are doing. I once worked-out that genitally mutilated Jewish males make-up just around 0.2 percent of the total number of genitally mutilated males around the world. By far, far the majority are Muslims; then followed by African of different beliefs; and then Christians from the USA.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 08:20 PM
-3

Blocked. Good. Now I can be mean to you without having to reply to your stupid comments 😀
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:20 PM
3

Calm down dear, calm down.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 03:18 PM
6

I don't trust the BBC an inch. Once in a blue moon they hold their noses and throw in an article like this. This enables them to claim they are "fair and balanced" LOL. Meanwhile, everyday on their website, there are endless article about "wimmin" how bad they have it.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:21 PM
2

No I'm just not willing to put in more time than you are to make your argument for you = I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:17 PM
1

"The lady doth protest too much, methinks" — c. 1600 Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Queen Gertrude ...keep going, you are just digging your hole deeper and deeper.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:16 PM
0

"google it". "look it up' = make my argument for me. No thanks "google it". "look it up' = I’m wrong, so I’ll make an excuse instead. No thanks
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:53 AM
1

You said that as a child, you would enjoy being sexually abused by an adult. Therefore, you think children enjoy sexual abuse. And if you had been sexually abused by a female teacher, you would have enjoyed it, and not reported her to the police. Now you’re trying to wriggle out of it. Good luck.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:48 AM
-3

Look it up.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 06:44 AM
-4

Because humans cannot perform mind-reading. Well, you don't need to "mind read" — just look and see if the person you are talking to has a pair of tits. If they do, then don't gratuitously explain something to them if you would not explain it to a man. Simples!
/r/MensRights15/09/18 11:51 PM
13

No, mansplaining is an attempt to silence opposing views via gender - shaming. Try reading what I actually posted. That is what I said. 🙄 "But now it's just used where a women is losing an argument to a man; and so she just claims he is mansplaining to her."
/r/MensRights15/09/18 10:35 PM
103

The original definition I read a good while back, was that mansplaining is where a man explains something to a women, assuming that because she is a woman, she needs it explaining to her. eg: You are chatting to a woman in a bar, and watching a soccer match on TV. A player is offside, and you start to explain the offside rule to her. She stops you and says: "Thanks, but actually I'm a soccer referee". You most likely would not have attempted to explain the offside rule to her if she had been a m…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:17 PM
1

Are you accusing me of saying what i'm saying? Yep. You said clearly you think that sexually abusing children is OK. I'm confused. You think that sexually abusing female children is wrong; but that sexually abusing male children is OK. So yes, you are confused.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:04 PM
1

That's why I said my 14 yo mind would be cool with it. Just because I state that sentence does not pontificate that I believe statutory rape is okay When your sentence says exactly that.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:55 PM
3

...we are just saying that at that age, it would have been a hell of an experience. So to you, sexually abusing a child is a "hell of an experience". But you claim not to be promoting the sexual abuse of children. Nice.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:53 PM
4

If you walk around saying that a 14 yo boy wouldn't want oral sex from a hot teacher then you either never were a 14 yo boy or totally forgot what it is to be one. Congratulations on promoting the sexual abuse of children! Is that a hobby of yours?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:27 PM
2

It takes the same number of violations to get out of a game so why does it matter if you play 3 or 5 sets? Because the whole argument was about "women are treated different to men", and the statistics being discussed are about that — violations not forfeiting games. One might argue that 5 sets are worse since it's a longer timespan and thus more occasions to lose your shit. I think that's a pretty weak argument though. er... it's actually a pretty strong argument! LOL And actually on one hand co…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:20 PM
3

Normal is not bad, and homosexuality is not normal. So if there is less of something, then that something is not "normal"? So having blond hair is not "normal" because only a minority of people have blond hair? 🤔 Certainly I don't think that, but I do think that it's different than sex for a boy. While I have not experienced sex as a girl, I am making my conclusion based upon empirical evidence, and it's not difficult to prove scientifically. TL;DR: boys enjoy being sexually abused by adults, bu…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:09 PM
2

Which doesn't really matter It does. The statistics count the number of violations, not the number of games forfeited or expulsions. 3 violations, and you are docked a game. Do something really mean, and you get expelled from the game or even the whole tournament.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:02 PM
9

So being gay is not normal; girls don’t enjoy sex and don’t desire to be penetrated; and you want to have illegal sex with 14 year old boys. Anything else on your list?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:46 AM
6

You are exactly correct. Why people down vote mathematics, statistics, logic and reason is beyond me.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:40 AM
6

I would assume the game count is fairly even Well you assume wrong. Women play 3 sets, whilst men have to play 5 sets.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:38 AM
9

er... but you haven’t taken into account his internalized misogyny. /s
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:36 AM
28

Just remember that Sandi Toksvig, one of the founders of the "Women's Equality Party" (sic), joked about male genital mutilation on the quiz show QI.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:55 PM
7

This is a fantastic video on the subject — presented by Ryan McAllister, Ph.D. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I And his website is here: http://www.notjustskin.org/node/7
/r/MensRights13/09/18 10:34 PM
9

Typical circumcision fetishist. Always looking for excuses to mutilate little boys' penis.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:34 PM
8

If you have a foreskin try this: Next time you go to a beach: Pull your foreskin back and put sand all over your glans etc. Allow your foreskin to roll forwards. Now you have an inner foreskin and glans full of sand. Now wait until you have the urge to urinate. Hold the tip of your foreskin closed, and urinate until your foreskin balloons up; now release the pressure on the tip of your foreskin somewhat, and gently squeeze the "ballon" allowing the urine to spray out. It will take all the sand w…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:03 PM
23

Good analysis of why the umpire was totally justified here: https://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/it-is-serena-williams-who-owes-an-apology-to-umpire-carlos-ramos-20180909-p502q2.htmle
/r/MensRights09/09/18 02:37 PM
5

And her opponent is half Hawian native as well! But still, it’s “racism”.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:17 AM
15

“Feminist Science” is a real thing.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:47 AM
24

This is the feminists laying the groundwork for a new crime to be brought into law: “Emotional Rape”. You’ll see more and more articles like this one.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:25 AM
34

Fantastic — this issue is hopefully starting to leak into the mainstream youth culture. And he's wearing what looks like a star of david as well! Although he is not Jewish. Fab. 10/10
/r/MensRights07/09/18 05:50 PM
1

Can you think of any laws that give the government the power to make decisions about the male body? er... yes. How about the abortion laws that allow the murder of literally hundreds of thousands of male fetuses every year? Not saying I agree with that — but it would have been a smart answer! 😀
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:22 AM
3

er... so we need to treat all women like precious little children, just in case they may have suffered abuse in the past, and we might be in danger of “triggering” them?
/r/MensRights06/09/18 07:36 AM
30

Exactly. Remember, that when the Titanic sank, many lifeboats left the ship only half-full, and only with women and children. Men were specifically banned from many lifeboats, even if there was space!
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:15 PM
0

I don't know who you're referring to. Of course you don't sweetie 😉😘
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:12 PM
1

"my mind ran away with me..."
/r/MensRights03/09/18 12:25 PM
1

Wow, you’re impressive. Not as impressive as a Pedo, Nazi, Baby Penis Mutilator though eh? 😂😘
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:04 AM
1

Josef Mengele is one of the darkest people of the 20th century but lead to major breakthroughs in medicine. Not exactly the best argument I've heard in favour of mutilating the genitals of infant Jewish babies (amongst others). But hey, it takes all-sorts I guess! Sieg Heil!
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:39 PM
4

u/aerovado — I understand that your pro-stance on mutilating the genitals of little boys is strong. But please don't post "research" by suspected pedophiles like you did above: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5296634/ Oh dear oh dear! The "RESULTS" (LOL) you have referenced have been "compiled" by the well known circumcision fetishist and suspected pedophile, "Professor" Brian J. Morris. His name is first as the author of the "paper" you cite. Morris is a member of the Gilgal Societ…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:51 PM
14

Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis Yes, and simple folk like you, sure need help with washing themselves eh?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:50 PM
0

I haven't had sex in weeks. I blame Donal Trump.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 12:40 PM
5

“The bill would still allow settlement agreements in sexual misconduct cases and allow the victim’s name to remain private, but the name of the perpetrator cannot be concealed.” Surprise, surprise.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 08:22 AM
5

"If you were a black person, you'd be going to jail".
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:00 PM
13

The article goes on to point out that apparently babies don't even scream during the modified procedure. Yeah — and I hear the that girls don't scream if you drug them first before raping them. /s
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:56 PM
3

... and your inmate number is?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:33 PM
2

Rape is , by definition, the application of force and violence for sexual purposes Oh dear... you are a little fresh faced around her aren't you sweetie? Try having sex with a willing and consenting female who's had a couple of beers on a college campus. Then, when she's "changed" her mind the next day, come back here and post the name of the penitentiary you will shortly be residing in, together with your inmate number, and we'll send you some chocolates and flowers in comissuration.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 04:14 PM
-9

Nice
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:45 AM
4

“Improper” sexual “relationship” = Rape Nice.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:44 AM
3

As for medical pros for it - I'll take this any day: Sure — dream on. LOL! 😉 Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: ht…
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:17 PM
8

In a radio interview, he talks about having his own son’s penis mutilated.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:17 PM
1

Hacking-off chunks of an un-concenting infant boy's penis, simply in the belief that he will not be able to clean himself in the shower, is child sex-abuse and mutilation. Same goes for lowering the risk of HIV & STI's. That's a decision for the owner of the penis to make — they can decide to amputate any of their body parts for "medical" reasons when they are 18. And by "foreskin constriction" you mean medical phimosis. This can be treated in a number of ways, and in non genital mutilation coun…
/r/MensRights16/08/18 12:37 PM
6

Now let's see how the FGM case goes in the USA — it's an interesting dilemma for the pro-MGM crowd: Guilty: Then how come MGM is illegal Not-Guilty: Feminists go nuts
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:11 AM
7

'Although the numbers appear to be falling, the fact that among inpatients more women than men have begun taking their own lives – a trend at odds with men’s much higher risk of suicide generally – has led campaigners to label the NHS’s care of women facing mental health issues as “not fit for purpose”'. You have to be seriously off your rocker to write such a sentence. I swear there is new language developing, it should be named: Femspeak. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/femspeak At the moment i…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:27 PM
4

You care for your family the way you want to. Sure. LOL! 😉 Note: The vast majority (not all) of these links from reputable scientific journals, with peer-reviewed research. 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healcthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://onlinelibrary…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:29 PM
2

She was Minister for Children, Education and Equality. ...and if you believe in equality — you're a feminist LOL.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:43 PM
-3

Actually, that's pretty much the totality of that page — feminism.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:32 PM
2

It's not actually clear, either from the article or from her profile, that she does identify as feminist. Take a wild guess, LOL. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_Trane_Nørby
/r/MensRights13/08/18 09:45 PM
-1

Where does it say she's a feminist? Take a wild guess, LOL. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_Trane_Nørby
/r/MensRights13/08/18 09:44 PM
3

eh... excuse me. Didn't you know: "...that expecting proper grammar from others perpetuates racism and 'unjust language structures'". https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/21/college-writing-center-proper-grammar-perpetuates-/ I forgive you 🤪 And just incase any of you missed it — I'm being sarcastic 😂
/r/MensRights06/08/18 03:16 PM
8

Smile. Relax. Chill. Don’t take everything so seriously. Especially serious things. You’ll feel better.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 09:21 AM
9

Probably why OP posted this as an oddly-cropped screenshot. Wrong. I archived the article, so that when the newspaper alters it surreptitiously after pressure from feminists, we will be able to see that. Click and look carefully.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 08:00 AM
15

Amusing irony but it says nothing about them being unable to find any women good enough. Multiple choice deduction test: Option 1: They found a woman good enough, but they decided to employ a man instead. Option 2: They could not find a woman good enough. Option 3: They did not look for a woman, and considered only men.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 07:56 AM
1

Snowflake.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:21 PM
1

Suck it up soy-boy.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 10:07 PM
1

The Serial Sexual Molester / Birther Racist / Russian Spy / Man Who Eats KFC With A Knife And Fork!
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:37 PM
0

I literally work in politics What — as in you have a “hobby” of troll posting on Reddit? LOL I did not vote for her Oh dear, it’s getting worse, we’ve got a Bernie lover in da house.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 09:21 AM
2

Then, he, another white man and with NO political experience, was voted into the most powerful position on Earth. Oh dear — it’s a pesky thing democracy eh? Tut tut, we can’t have the ordinary people deciding who should represent them can we now? No use in having an experienced business person in charge is there? Oh no no no, much better to have a lawyer and “community organiser” running everything. LOL.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 06:07 AM
9

So now they want a ”...cultural statute of limitations” on old tweets. LOL. You couldn’t make it up.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 09:29 AM
2

So you’d be OK with a 29 year old male teacher pulling your 14 year old daughter’s panties down and licking her pussy. Nice.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 08:58 AM
1

”He wielded power like a tyrant...” (on Castro) er... he wasn’t “like” a tyrant, he was a tyrant.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:47 PM
1

"The judge said the union should be recognised because the couple, who took their vows in 1998, lived as man and wife, introduced each other as such and had expectations similar to a British marriage contract." "But Mr Justice Williams decided that the marriage was 'entered into in disregard of certain requirements as to the formation of marriage'. He said the marriage was therefore "void" and that Mrs Akhtar is entitled to a decree of nullity. If he had ruled it was a non-marriage she would not…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 03:50 PM
7

The sexual harm order was to avoid the risk of her “forming a relationship with a lad of 14 or 15”, the court heard. So having illegal sex with a 13 year old is a “relationship”.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 07:54 AM
9

"Her study found that subjects were far less judgmental of fathers..." LOL. Forget about leaving your kid in your car as a dad — you come under suspicion simply for walking down the street with your daughter. And in the UK, if a dad books a hotel room to share with his child, the police will be called.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 10:00 PM
8

Up yer bum
/r/MensRights29/07/18 09:44 PM
20

u/AmericanMcGeePhallus : 1 day old account. Only 3 posts, two of which are calling people "bitter". Troll.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 07:57 PM
13

These are wise, wise words. Jordan Peterson gives a great talk, where he talk about the futility of trying to be like the small number of high-achieving men who work 24/7. It applies to both men and women.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 07:55 PM
27

anyone else we should mention? Yes: The 49% of women who voted to leave: https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/how-britain-voted-2016-eu-referendum
/r/MensRights27/07/18 12:34 PM
11

So boys are now ”budding patriarchs”.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 07:13 AM
1

er... so it's OK for her son to help out his brother or any other boy/male; but not OK for him to help his sister, mother, or any female?
/r/MensRights25/07/18 06:41 PM
11

Exactly. And also calling MGM the “snip” is disgusting. The banana image (where part of the skin at the end has been cut off) would be truthful if the exposed part was brown and decaying.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 07:34 AM
5

"Data, released by the Ministry of Justice, reveals that in 2017 only 22% of Thames Valley Police's prosecutions for rape were successful." er... surely a "successful" prosecution and trial is where justice is done, and the not-guilty are found not-guilty, and the guilty are found guilty. "Something is going wrong because the evidence required in rape cases to get a case brought to court is so high. Any question marks and the case is unlikely to go forward." Unless of course you have CCTV provin…
/r/MensRights23/07/18 07:09 PM
2

So how do we promote nursery teaching as a positive career for men? er... stop man-hating rags like The Guardian from constantly promoting hatred of men and boys; and confront society when it engages in demonising all men as violent and rapists. There are no simple solutions See above.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 09:48 PM
55

"The corporation's Director of News Fran Unsworth said: 'It means police investigations, and searches of people's homes, could go unreported and unscrutinised.'" er.. "unscrutinised" by who exactly? You mean unscrutinised by the man-hating BBC and most of the rest of the UK press infiltrated by feminist ideology — where the "...victim must always be believed" mentality rules. Exhibit A: BBC Director of News Fran Unsworth If a suspect is investigated or their home is search, they are totally at l…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:51 AM
2

So that's a yes then. Nice.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:25 PM
2

OK. You don't care about your sister being sexually assaulted. Nice
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:20 PM
2

What are you even talking about? er... that's what the girl in the video is doing — working in a late night bar. Put the weed down and sleep it off.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:06 PM
3

So let's get this straight: Your sister works hard serving drinks in a late-night bar. You pop into visit her — maybe to give her a lift home at 3am. You are waiting for her to finish her shift, and you observe her ass being grabbed just like in this video. You do nothing, and just chuckle to yourself. Nice.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:51 PM
1

Blah... blah... blah... until it's your sister, and then you'd be breaking the guys arms.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:12 PM
8

Would you feel the same if it was a woman who had part of her genitals sliced off at birth, and she was on the stage ranting? Would she need to give “reasons”? If someone steals $10,000 from you, would you need to give “reasons” as to why that is a bad thing before you complained?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:19 AM
7

FGM has been defined as child sex-abuse by the UN and WHO. Mutilating the sex organs of any child is clearly sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 07:11 AM
0

I have seen dudes just randomly start talking to girls as they try and work out, not getting the hint that she just wants to focus on her workout and not him. Until of course a dude she fancies — and then suddenly, the girl is just fine with being "harassed".
/r/MensRights11/07/18 03:46 PM
6

They were doing pretty well until towards the end when it was all blamed on the “patriarchy”. 🙄
/r/MensRights11/07/18 07:02 AM
1

In scenario 1, if a man were robbed or attacked, the bar would be blamed, too. Maybe. But that's not the point is it? The point is that people — both men and women — should take responsibility for their own behaviour, and not try and blame government or corporations. What next — the law saying shops must refuse to sell chocolate and ice cream to overweight people? And if a man was stabbed to death after being thrown out of a bar drunk, you can bet that it would get nowhere near the coverage or o…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 10:56 AM
1

This was in Australia where businesses who are licenced to serve alcohol cannot serve intoxicated patrons ...and?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:30 PM
0

I agree. It's the law. But that's the whole point: Scenario 1: Women gets blind drunk, bar, staff & management get the "blame" and are held legally liable. If they were to dump the woman outside, and then she were to get raped, they would get blamed for that as well (along with all the other men in the world). Scenario 2: Women buys a bottle of Vodka, and drinks it all at her home alone. She gets blind drunk. Then, at 3am she decides to walk to her mum's place across deserted wasteland notorious…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 02:29 PM
9

There is no hope left...
/r/MensRights09/07/18 06:18 AM
-1

Don’t worry, they’re making the sandwiches 😉
/r/MensRights08/07/18 03:17 PM
15

The man is not a party to the suit, it's the Crown that charges the woman on their own behalf. Correct. But the man may be called to give evidence. And when the Crown charges the woman, it is typically for 'perverting the course of justice' or 'wasting police time', never for a crime against the only victim, the man she falsely accused. Excellent point. There is no such crime as: False Accusation of Rape! As far as the law is concerned, no crime has been committed against the victim, the man. Ma…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 08:52 PM
123

Note how a man can be convicted on the testimony of a woman alone, with NO other evidence. But a woman has never been convicted of a false rape allegation solely on a man’s evidence.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 04:40 PM
9

Shocking, just so shocking. But it's not like a one-off. Even when they have clear CCTV evidence that the accused could not possibly have committed the crime, they still prosecute: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/12146351/No-one-is-safe-from-prosecutors-terrifying-incompetence-on-sex-crimes.html
/r/MensRights04/07/18 01:06 PM
2

I wonder how many men would happily pay $4,600 to send their wives away to a man-free island for a week or so 😀.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:19 AM
10

The Terms & Conditions don't seem to exclude men. The test would be to purchase a ticket, and then turn-up with a beard and beer-belly and see if they let you in.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 03:21 PM
1

"In a case where a complainant is young, vulnerable or suggestible it may be very unfair to prosecute her, particularly if her complaint originated in fear at being found to have had consensual sexual relations with someone disapproved of by her family." Really? Is the level we have decided to? I female can falsely accuse a man of rape, and her defence can be "...my mom made me do it". Notice how when it suits them, feminists are suddenly OK with women being weak and easily manipulated.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:07 PM
11

Yeah, my Nigerian female friends agree. They are all really happy with their tidy circumcised vulvas — and all the men love it! 👍
/r/MensRights29/06/18 05:33 PM
1

What it's not doing is saying "these people are crazy" or "it's unreasonable to have feelings about this." Except, if you take the time to read his other articles, and you were familier with the feminist’s support and even promotion of Male Genital Mutilation, you would realise that that is exactly what he is doing. Again, where does he say that MGM is evil, or that it’s “OK to have feelings” about it? Nowhere. That’s because he’s using psycho-babble to gaslight men.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:07 PM
4

Really? Then where in the article does the author acknowledge this “original pain”? Nowhere. Instead, he’s using psycho-babble to imply that men who are furious at having a large part of their penis cut-off have psychological issues, and no sane claim to their anger. Google the author’s name. He a rabid pro-genital mutilator. Then Google “circumcision psychopathology”, and if you want some more fun Google “circumcision fetishism”.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 01:27 PM
16

The whole premise negates the suffering of men who have been genitaly mutilated. That is ignored, and instead, the article attempts to gaslight men by implying that somehow they are psychologically ill.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 06:16 AM
21

...er, so if a girl has her clitoris cut off, and then feels “incomplete”, that has noting to do with the fact she has had her clitoris cut off? Daffy nonesense.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:13 AM
34

”...preempt anyone inclined to mistake it for mainstream feminism” I’m not “mistaking” anything, I can assure you.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 06:02 AM
161

...and the classic "feminist" glasses! Nice
/r/MensRights11/06/18 12:01 PM
21

low maintenance aspect of it. Next: u/cream_y is having all his teeth removed for "the low maintenance aspect" of it.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:59 AM
-19

You are happy with “less penis” and a shorter and narrower penis then intact men. So no surprise you feel a bit lonely on a sub devoted to men’s rights LOL 😂
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:55 AM
3

Exactly. He’s getting a dose of his own medicine. Very satisfying to see.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 09:52 AM
3

Good point — but hatred against men has been accepted by the mainstream media for years, but they have always denied it.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:23 AM
37

In some respects, this is good news: It's a clear, unambiguous and undisguised declaration that feminism is really about the hatred of men. It even goes so far as to advocate for violence against men, and indeed murder. And it's from a mainstream, "respected" media source: The Washington Post. And authored by a "...professor of sociology and director of the Woman's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program at Northeastern University". So next time any feminist (male, female or other) claims that ".…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 01:17 PM
24

Looks like a man: check Has pink hair: check Confirmed: Mad feminist.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 08:47 AM
19

Just came here to post this! Bizarre. Blind as a bat.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 04:45 PM
3

Confirmed: u/skepticalbob is not God the Almighty.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 11:01 PM
2

"Reality" is independent of "how you seek information" or "how media consumption works". But I guess you could "decide" reality if you are not just a random poster on Reddit, but are in fact God Almighty the creator of the heaven and earth and the cosmos etc... I think you should reveal yourself... don't be shy.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:22 PM
7

You don't know anything about how I decide reality. Hmmmm... I didn't know that "reality" could be "decided" LOL.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 05:03 PM
9

That's not nearly enough to evidence your claim, which is that the entire system is systematically and deliberately rigged against men by a cabal of feminists. Alas, by the time there is enough evidence to suit blind people like you, you will be safely locked-up with all the other men (not that I'm assuming your gender of course 😘)
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:36 PM
15

You believe that there is some cabal of militant feminists secretly running the entire judicial system? Well, not far off that — and not secret for sure!: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:13 PM
15

Note how this article (in The Guardian of course) doesn't mention the world "men" or "man" once. Not once. Even though 98% of the people effected by this evil fraud are men. Instead, we get: "The cases in all concerned 48 people, of which one was a woman..." This is what fake news is all about. Not the outright lies — but rather the subtle omissions and slants.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:02 PM
53

"Police chief admits: 'We cannot allow mistakes to impact on people's lives'" "Mistakes..." sure. LOL. You mean a deliberate policy, instigated and implemented by radical men-hating feminists, to increase the "rape conviction" rate by embracing and encouraging false-rape accusations — and then rigging the the prosecution and justice system to put innocent men in prison.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 12:54 PM
1

there are three Wrong. There are 63. You have been reported for hate speech. You must attend a compulsory gender re-training course by next Friday. https://apath.org/63-genders/ Masculine Homosexual Man Masculine Heterosexual Man Masculine Bisexual Man Feminine Homosexual Man Feminine Heterosexual Man Feminine Bisexual Man Androgine Homosexual Man Androgine Heterosexual Man Androgine Bisexual Man Masculine Heterosexual Woman Masculine Homosexual Woman Masculine Bisexual Woman Feminine Heterosexu…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:44 PM
1

meh
/r/MensRights04/06/18 04:38 PM
1

meh
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:40 PM
1

meh
/r/MensRights03/06/18 05:56 PM
1

meh
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:26 PM
3

How many genders are there?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:47 AM
10

Doesn't anyone else think it's super weird to call circumcision "mutilation"? er... nope. Male "circumcision" is terribly damaging: The foreskin has evolved over millions of years, and every male (and female) mammal has one. Like all of the human body — it's pretty impressive!: Functions of the Foreskin A list sourced from medical publications. Referenced links here What does the male foreskin do? Foreskin... Protects the infant from contaminants, infection, and meatal stenosis. The foreskin is …
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:45 AM
3

God, life is so complicated these days 🙄
/r/MensRights03/06/18 06:35 AM
1

meh
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:28 PM
1

Funny how when I poke you about your "religion" you start to whine like a little girl.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 10:15 PM
1

I hate Jesus and I'm not a Christian Exactly. You're Jewish, hate Jesus, and like interfering with little boys' penis with a sharp knife. Be cool with it bro.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 08:28 PM
3

Spot on. It’s a black “victim” graduation.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 07:34 AM
1

If you don't believe what the Bible says, then you are not a Christian and you hate Jesus. Don't worry about it.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 09:44 PM
1

You deny Jesus. So not a Christian for sure.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 08:43 PM
1

You're welcome. Enjoy your mass rapes and human sacrifice.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 08:11 PM
1

you can't be this stupid. Oh, OK. So you don't believe in the Bible or Jesus Christ. No probleemo.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 08:05 PM
2

You are just in denial. Jesus was a nice Jewish boy, and the Jewish Messiah. So that makes you Jewish. Nothing wrong with that. And you believe in lots of weird bible shit such a stoning women to death for adultery, mass rape, baby killing and ritual human sacrifice. (Christians believe the same shit as it's the same bible). You enjoying mutilating infant boys' penis is starting to look a tad lame in comparison...
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:56 PM
1

You are a member of a minor Jewish sect run by a bunch of fanatics — Christianity. The man you worship, Jesus, was a nice Jewish boy. Conclusion: You are Jewish.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:43 PM
1

Confirmed: Jewish.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:36 PM
3

Oh you're Jewish — that's why.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 07:28 PM
5

meh Yeah — your mom and dad paid a crazy guy $300 to mutilate your penis because they loved their invisible sky God more than you. But you seem pretty unloveable.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:55 PM
3

Anyway, I'm done with the issue. It just isn't important. Translation: I lost the argument LOL. Typical coward — supports sexually mutilating the genitals of little boys, and then runs away crying when he's caught out.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:15 PM
8

meh Hmmm... I wonder if u/kvrdave is "meh" about all this: WARNING: ALL LINKS AND IMAGES NOT SAFE FOR LIFE You can watch an infant boy being sexually fondled and masturbated here by a mohel. He's given a forced erection, so then it's easier for the child sex-abuser to mutilate his penis: https://youtu.be/yaaw7wivUN4?t=3m12s And here is the proof that this is all deliberate: In the "Surgery of Ritual Circumcision", Dr. Snowman states, "When the penis of an infant is in a state of erection the ope…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:14 PM
20

I don't know what I'm missing, and I honestly don't care. It just doesn't bother me. Sure... LOL! Male "circumcision" is terribly damaging: The foreskin has evolved over millions of years, and every male (and female) mammal has one. Like all of the human body — it's pretty impressive!: Functions of the Foreskin A list sourced from medical publications. Referenced links here What does the male foreskin do? Foreskin... Protects the infant from contaminants, infection, and meatal stenosis. The fore…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:36 PM
16

This program sounds fantastic. This is what really "empowering" women is all about. The are a small number of men, who need this sort of clear, unambiguous rejection. How far would Harvey Weinstein have got, if this course was taught to every model, actress and actor in the world? And they seem to be combining this program, with others that get women to think about what they really want from their encounters with men, and then make real choices. eg: If a man invites you "up for coffee", then und…
/r/MensRights30/05/18 10:00 PM
18

feminists would be out of a job Don't worry — they'd soon find something else to complain about!
/r/MensRights30/05/18 09:55 PM
8

er... you've banged-on about the "benefits" and the "risks, but you've conveniently forgotten that the male foreskin is a body-part with numerous functions, properties and structures. So you've excluded the damage that male genital mutilation causes: Male "circumcision" is terribly damaging: The foreskin has evolved over millions of years, and every male (and female) mammal has one. Like all of the human body — it's pretty impressive!: Functions of the Foreskin A list sourced from medical public…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 09:20 PM
7

I don't know how anyone who isn't an absolute moron could interpret this as anything more than satire even without the tag. But that's the whole point. Of course it's satire. But it's not "satire" as in: "...the concept of 'toxic masculinity' is misandrist and evil", so let's satirise it to highlight this viewpoint. Rather, it's satire as in: "...toxic masculinity is a real thing and all men are toxic or at least prone to be toxic", so let's satirise it to reinforce this view.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 04:39 PM
22

“Seven Signs that Your Girl’s Jewishness Is Nontoxic” But don’t worry — it’s tagged as satire LOL
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:01 AM
3

Try something called “thinking”.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 09:49 AM
4

But by an objective standard, it is senseless Humans are not objects. From an "objective" standard, all of human experiences and existence, good or bad, is "senseless".
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:33 AM
5

Making a false rape report is a senseless act. Nope. Not to the person doing it. Would it have been better if the author would have called is sensible? Nope. Better to call it what it is: an evil, immoral act, by an evil, immoral person.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:23 AM
2

😘
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:49 PM
1

Oh, so you had one of those fancy walk-in food storage freezers for the chefs that opened with a key switch and not a button. Got it.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:37 PM
6

This isn't complicated Indeed. Evil people, do evil things. They have no morals or sense of right and wrong. They only consider themselves — they don't think that others have feelings or rights. To such people, such actions are not "illogical" or "senseless". Far from it, in their world-view, they are totally logical and sensible actions. Only if SJW's fail to see women as capable of evil, will they then consider such actions as "illogical" or "senseless". Ring any bells... ??
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:12 PM
4

... And that's illogical and senseless to do. Ah yes: Husband threatens to leave wife because she is having an affair. Wife goes to police to claim "sexual & physical abuse". Wife gets the house, all the money, all the husband's pension and the kids. And she shacks-up with her lover. Husband goes to jail. Totally "illogical" and "senseless" LOL.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:03 PM
11

Let women say what they want and let men say what they want. You shouldn’t really be listening to people like that. It may not even be sexual by nature. When people get sexually turned-on, people start talking sexually. Blaming men for “talking provocatively” is like blaming a kid that left his bike outside for it getting stolen. Don’t victim blame.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:43 PM
2

As a career military officer Frightening — because you don't seem to have understood what I wrote, and you just replied as if I had said something different. I trust you are in charge of cooks or such like, and not any important red buttons. LOL.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:41 PM
1

I bet you weren't expecting me to write that. er... so you're saying that: "...the white cop that kills black men, represents all white people" (not just other cops).
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:38 PM
1

And she does not represent black women or black people. But the white cop that kills black men, represents all white people though eh?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 08:21 PM
8

Well, it is all those things, isn't it? er... no it’s none of those things actually. The woman made the false rape allegation to get revenge on the cop and escape any possible charges. Not a “mystery”, unless you view all woman as angels and all men as pigs. Just see all the links right here in these comments. Woman make false-rape allegations the whole time, for all sorts of reasons. Often just on a whim.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:16 PM
6

"An awful tendency exists in this country to hold all people of color responsible for the transgressions of one person in that group. That’s racism and it must be rejected here." But OK to hold all white people responsible for the transgressions of one person in that group eh? And of course men are to blame for everything.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:00 PM
1

Looks like a staged Twitter account and posting to me. Grammar and punctuation is too perfect. Someone hiding behind TOR I would imagine.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:57 AM
16

Hilarious. Like women are going to queue-up to work in those sectors LOL!
/r/MensRights24/05/18 09:46 PM
1

I know! Someone must be interfering with the matrix... And more good news — this false rape accuser had her sentence increased from probation to jail time: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/false-rape-accuser-jailed-after-solicitor-generals-referral
/r/MensRights23/05/18 10:30 PM
6

This woman has the classic "concerned & troubled" mask on her face the whole time. We are seeing it more and more in life and in various videos. You can buy a "concerned & troubled" mask at your local party store, and then when you are struck with an attack of "victimitis", you can just pop it on and look the part. /s
/r/MensRights23/05/18 07:59 PM
73

I hope he gets his pension as well.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:39 AM
3

Note how the feminists demand abortion on demand for any reason, and declare “My body, my choice” etc. But if you want a laugh, ask if they are OK with sex-selective abortion. eg: you can abort the baby because it’s female. Suddenly, you’ll find they are pro-life in that instance.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:32 AM
3

A big thanks. Every man in the world should watch that video, as it applies not just to the USA.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 02:15 AM
19

We also just walked at a park for a while, we were never alone/intimate. Well that's your "claim" as far as the police will be concerned. Meanwhile, she of course can make any shit up, and will be "believed" automatically. F--k me. In the UK, you can be arrested, charged and tried for rape, when there is even CCTV proof of you not raping anyone: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435317/Tried-sex-crime-brushed-past-film-star-rush-hour.html
/r/MensRights23/05/18 12:23 AM
1

Confirmed: Soy-Boy.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:37 PM
1

Confirmed: Drinks soy-milk.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:34 PM
3

Some folks need to stay off the whisky, and some folks need to stay off the soy-milk. No need to guess which one you are.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 04:29 PM
5

Shock horror — beautiful attractive woman, marries handsome, rich, well attached man. She clearly loves the limelight, so there is no better job for her to do. And let’s be clear — it’s a job.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 11:58 AM
2

When I saw this story on CNN I literally guffawed out loud.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:03 PM
8

Minimum 12 years — except in "special cases" of course: Pussy-Pass #1: Female Pussy-Pass #2: Ethnic Minority/Person of Color. Pussy-Pass #3: Drug addict Pussy-Pass #4: He abused her Pussy-Pass #5: She was depressed Pussy-Pass #6: A man once whistled at her in the street. So that minus 2 years per Pussy-Pass, result: Probation only!
/r/MensRights17/05/18 09:51 PM
12

Nice :-) IMHO, it's all just a girly fad anyway. It's cool at the moment, but the wimmin will just get bored after a while, and then move onto something new.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:24 PM
22

The whole concept of there being a "health benefit" to cutting off a healthy part of the human body is just absurd. For instance: 50% of cancers of the vulva originate on the labia lips. So why isn't cutting the healthy labia lips off infant girls considered a health benefit?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:21 PM
9

"The uniformity of the spaces had another effect on one woman who was going through menopause–she felt like she couldn’t have a fan on her desk to help with hot flashes because everyone would have noticed: 'I just have to sort of work through it,' she told the researchers." Fuck me. We're all doomed.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 01:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter