TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cool-Breezy-Rain Archive

View 27 posts and 163 comments by Cool-Breezy-Rain on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1627

Activism/SupportCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:42 PM
849

DiscriminationCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:56 PM
840

GeneralCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights04/12/24 10:31 PM
543

DiscriminationCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights15/06/25 02:53 PM
535

FeminismCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:03 PM
471

False AccusationCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:55 PM
329

DiscriminationCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights10/10/24 12:03 AM
297

IntactivismCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:35 AM
287

Activism/SupportCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights22/12/24 10:59 AM
272

IntactivismCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:27 AM
239

Activism/SupportCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:00 PM
226

Activism/SupportCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights10/10/24 03:08 PM
181

Activism/SupportCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights08/03/25 05:46 AM
177

Activism/SupportCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights07/04/25 06:44 PM
143

Edu./Occu.Cool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights20/03/25 09:41 PM
142

Activism/SupportCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights09/08/24 07:28 PM
100

Legal RightsCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights26/03/25 08:31 PM
92

DiscriminationCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights27/03/25 07:18 PM
65

Marriage/ChildrenCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:52 AM
57

DiscriminationCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights29/11/23 02:59 PM
46

GeneralCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights10/12/24 10:16 PM
39

Legal RightsCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:23 AM
38

Activism/SupportCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights25/07/25 05:38 PM
32

DiscriminationCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights18/04/25 09:43 PM
16

DiscriminationCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:54 PM
0

Social IssuesCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights17/04/25 03:40 AM
0

Legal RightsCool-Breezy-Rain/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:15 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes apparently making sure your life isn't destroyed by false allegations is more important than a bunch of random names on a website.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 06:22 PM
2

There's no need to. Men can still use the gym. Case law says that they can advertise it however they like so long as men are not actually restricted. If a man wants to use the gym at the allotted time, he can just do so and nobody can tell him to leave.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 01:00 AM
9

Right by automatically registering it nullifies all penalties for not registering so you can't really sue because there are no actual damages until the draft is reinstated.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 09:37 PM
78

Well race is relevant. Although I feel like sex was the driving factor here. A white woman's feelings vs a black man's life is a familiar battle in American cultural politics. Cue Emmitt Till.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 01:31 AM
27

The person suffering life threatening injuries is always the priority. The "officer" could've been treated on the spot with a lollipop and a nursery rhyme. Now your tax dollars will go to the "criminal's" family. Probably millions of dollars since no actual crime was articulated.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 01:27 AM
27

Reading is fucking fundamental. A judge or jury decides whether or not someone is a criminal, not a police officer. A person isn't qualified to be law enforcement if they can't keep their composure on the job and life threatening injuries should be treated first regardless if the person is an officer or an accused civilian.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 01:21 AM
7

This video is annoying. He basically said the same thing over and over again until 5 minutes in.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 02:30 AM
5

I think you mean to post this in r/racisms
/r/MensRights12/02/26 04:17 AM
0

But you love Fox News I'm willing to bet.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 02:15 AM
0

So basically, NO, you do not have an actual point to make because instead of doing your own research and making informed arguments based on them, you just dismiss individuals as stupid because they cited a source you didn't like, didn't research and therefore can't dismiss with any reasonable level of accuracy. "Question everything you hear, verify every fact you're told." is advice you give, but obviously did not practice. To dismiss FACTS from "mainstream corporate news" without ANY attempt to…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 03:14 AM
1

Do you have an actual point to make, or is 1st grade name calling the apex of your intellectual capabilities?
/r/MensRights28/12/25 07:21 PM
1

When i was growing up, I was self-conscious about being intact but now, I thank my lucky stars because the foreskin provides so much amazing, rich, complex sensation. What's crazy is that since I've started working out at the gym before work and taking showers there, I've noticed that waaay more guys are intact than I thought. (My gym has open communal showers) Circumcised men worry about the lack of sensation, intact men often deal with self-consciousness and insecurity due to being told by soc…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 01:45 AM
1

Because anyone can select the "woman" option for their gender and Uber has no way of checking it
/r/MensRights26/07/25 07:19 PM
2

You can change your gender in the app. Uber cant actually discriminate based on sex. Thats why all the ads say "woman" drivers and not "female"
/r/MensRights26/07/25 03:24 AM
2

Yes, you can change your gender in the app easily and as many times as you wish
/r/MensRights26/07/25 03:21 AM
5

The answer is actually very simple. There's an active Jewish/Zionist campaign to keep circumcision numbers high. They use the medical industry to paint the foreskin as dirty, useless, and problematic. The medical industry happily obliges because they profit beautifully from it. So, they use high-pressure sales tactics to bully parents into mutilating their baby.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 05:53 PM
1

Well, sadly, and as someone who has worked in retail and customer service, I can tell you MEN DONT COMPLAIN! Women will go OUT OF THEIR WAY, to talk to managers, call HR, call customer service and wait on hold for 3 days to speak with upper management. They will fill out surveys, give a damn blood sample lmao! Men, sadly won't go out of their way to complain over a damn thing, no matter how egregious. A public restroom might have shit slathered on the walls, he MAY quietly say something to the c…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:48 PM
0

Everyone's mad and down voting, but youre right on point!
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:39 PM
-1

Those are people that know how the law works. CASE LAW almost unanimously will tell you that race and sex are not at all treated the same in American courts including the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court itself holds that sex discrimination is perfectly constitutional do long as it does not deny "equal protection." For example, North Carolinas "Assault On A Female" law that says you can only be charged if youre a male over the age of 18 who assaults a female. It doesnt deny "equal protection" in…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:37 PM
-2

Yall are very emotional here. Calm down! This is just my understanding of the actual policy and the way discrimination law is applied regarding SEX. which I've actually done research on. I use Uber twice a day, 5 days a week. I can show you the very policy where it clearly states that no rider or driver is allowed to refuse a ride or pick up based on SEX, thats not going to change. If you try to sue them, what are you going to say? "Oh. My ride would've arrived sooner if I identified as a woman?…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:32 PM
0

Who said I was fine with it. Nowhere in the statement did I express my opinion. Those are the facts of the law. You have to prove an injury first. Then the letter of the law applies. There is no constitutional definition of "gender"
/r/MensRights24/07/25 08:18 PM
1

Im waiting for approval
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:01 AM
2

They make you take a selfie
/r/MensRights24/07/25 03:01 AM
-26

This is not accurate. Ubers discrimination policy PROHIBITS discrimination based on SEX and this includes refusing pick ups and rides based on sex. Males will not be discriminated against per se. The policy allows WOMEN to choose a preference for WOMEN. The user is allowed to select their own GENDER in the personal detail options. So technically a male could just select "woman" and there's nothing they could do to dispute that. Furthermore it only prioritizes women it doesnt guarantee a woman wi…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 02:57 AM
3

Notice how in the article they say woman, women, man and men and never mention "male or female." This is to avoid litigation. Their non discrimination policy states thats its against their rules to discriminate based on gender identity or sex etc. this includes refusing a ride or pick up from someone based on those characteristics. Therefore you can certainly be a MALE and use the "woman" rider and driver preference so long as "woman" is your gender identity. That way, they can make these headli…
/r/MensRights23/07/25 11:43 PM
2

Its not really "sex" discrimination. The app allows you to choose between "man, woman, non-binary or other" Anyone can select any option because its based on gender identity rather than sex IE male and female. And it only "prioritizes" women drivers, meaning if a "woman" driver is not reasonably available, you will still receive a "man" driver. They aren't going to call a woman driver from across town to pick you up when 3 man drivers are much closer but if a woman driver is 5 minutes away and 2…
/r/MensRights23/07/25 11:32 PM
-15

Im joining! Wish me luck guys!
/r/MensRights23/07/25 10:00 PM
28

We should respond by rating every female driver with 1 star and cite "i prefer a male driver" as the reason. Also, cancel and rebook the ride if it pairs you with a female. If we let Uber get away with this, more will follow. Next, men will have to sit in the back of the bus because they will implement women only sections on public transportation then, other businesses will begin discriminatory practices like these.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 09:07 PM
1

Not if you stop paying
/r/MensRights14/07/25 04:38 AM
1

Stop paying for everything and move to another state NOW because its not going to get better. As long as she has no lawyer, she has no case, if you want the kids, take them now while you are still legally married and disappear!!!!
/r/MensRights11/07/25 12:37 AM
1

Where are "men not allowed?" Just because people will criticize you doesn't mean you're not allowed. Men are way too sensitive to criticism, and a lot of mens rights issues hinge on men "not being allowed" to do certain things for fear of criticism and ostrization Do it anyway! The whole point of being a "grown ass man" is that you can do whatever you feel like doing for the most part. Nobody can stop you. You're going to suffer either way so might as well just say how you feel. The biggest less…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 11:17 PM
2

Thats quite obvious.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:45 PM
15

It's Instagram. I dont not have Tik Tok at all.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 04:37 PM
6

Yes. If you live with your girlfriend at least.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 12:10 AM
15

And how do women controll that? You're gay! You're zesty! You're Saucy! Men are so afraid to be labeled as gay that sometimes I feel homophobia hurts straight men more than it does gay men
/r/MensRights15/05/25 09:51 PM
3

Regression? Apparently tribal Africans in many tribes have persisted for hundreds of thousands of years. How old is America? already on the brink of collapse after.a mere 200.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 09:39 PM
2

It's when a bunch of troops are sent to a mission where most of them will obviously be slaughtered but it's beneficial for the mission so they have no choice. Basically like a suicide attack
/r/MensRights13/05/25 12:08 AM
1

He was uncut too. Omg
/r/MensRights12/05/25 02:51 AM
22

Link?
/r/MensRights11/05/25 08:45 PM
4

It's really boring. Just a bunch of "Any Tea?" Posts featuring photos of random men. Most posts have no comments
/r/MensRights27/04/25 05:51 PM
11

I'm currently in one of those groups in disguise 🤣 🤣 🤣
/r/MensRights27/04/25 03:31 PM
2

Not being a doctor or an expert on this scientific topic, I'm not comfortable with jumping to conclusions. It very well may be so.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 11:38 AM
5

"More Active" and ADHD are not the same thing and do not the same thing make.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:41 AM
1

I think Iran would obliterate Israel. All Israel has is weapons.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:40 AM
0

Yeah, not without a complete and utterly mess and massive unacceptable loss of valuable male life.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 05:37 AM
1

Sadly it's not about what a man can do. That's why 30 year old men are exempt from a draft. They want young men who aren't married and don't have any money or own any businesses yet. Literally the most disposable people in our society besides homeless people (who obviously have issues that prevent them from being soldiers) is young men age 18-26. At 18 we lose the "preciousness" of being a child but don't yet have the worth of being a man so basically trash lol women, when they turn 18, are stil…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 05:36 AM
-1

If your argument is that war with Iran is no big deal and America will be able to swiftly defeat them without massive loss of American life then that's a belief ill let you have alone. America's military bloatedness is it's downfall. Every American military base is a target. Iran may very well already have nuclear weapons
/r/MensRights25/04/25 05:31 AM
-2

You mean Afghanistan where we were stuck 20 years and had to back out with our tails tucked? Iran is much more populous, has a bigger more organized military, more advanced weapons and better overall military capabilities. A war with Iran will be 10 times the disaster that Afghanistan was. Ask any military expert.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:26 AM
5

The men were stripped to determine if they were circumcised.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:32 AM
1

Zombie Jesus transitioned from a 3 days dead rotting corpse into your walking messiah and that is not disturbing to you but someone who wants put on makeup and hair to feel like Barbara Streisand is concerning to you?
/r/MensRights24/04/25 11:10 PM
-6

This is 2025, not 1920. Science does this thing where it's constantly moving forward. This means medical science TODAY is much more advanced than back then, including our understanding of gender and how it works. Speaking of 2025, is strange to see people comparing women to chicken nuggets. We now know that women are human beings, not food and not objects so try utilizing that notion for a comparison next time.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 11:07 PM
-1

I think she is telling her son that he is free to be who he wants in the body he's in.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 10:59 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights24/04/25 10:58 PM
2

I never said anything about leaving any category of men behind. My entire post was about including men, not leaving any man behind.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 03:56 PM
1

Nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 05:46 PM
1

It's no longer her movement.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 09:26 PM
2

Because the founder of the metro movement is a black woman who was advocating mostly for black female victims who are often dismissed and not taken seriously when sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 09:25 PM
2

When Karma steps in, Israel will be no more.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:32 PM
0

It was in Iraq.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:31 PM
0

Source: https://www.democracynow.org/2006/7/24/headlines/us_soldiers_ordered_to_kill_all_military_age_males
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:30 PM
12

Not necessarily. The individual, a black woman, started the metoo movement. It was white feminism that bastardized it into the anti male, cancel culture witch hunt that it is.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:28 PM
13

Do you have have anything of value to add to add to the conversation?
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:26 PM
-3

Yes it did. Look up Obama and "military age males" also look up where they were routinely lining up Muslim school boys and executing them
/r/MensRights07/04/25 11:45 PM
1

Okay so go ahead and use the urinal with a vagina. See how that works out. Your argument is that it's not that serious? Okay then why is using the "correct" restroom even an issue? Just use the restroom for your sex and move on since it's not a big deal. I personally do not care. I take every precaution to not ever have to use public restrooms because that's nasty. Lmao
/r/MensRights28/03/25 09:20 PM
2

Perhaps policy should mandate four seperate restrooms: male, female, family & transgender I personally believe if you have a pussy, you should use the pussy room and if you have a penis use the penis room. I feel like just renaming them to penis and pussy rooms instead if "male and female" would solve everything.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 11:21 AM
1

The "designation" is fluid and can change under certain circumstances. It doesn't matter that the language is gender neutral, men will be prosecuted more. Nobody is going to prosecute some white lady for breaking this law.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 11:15 AM
1

No, that's not what the argument was, try reading further to where I clearly explained who "these people" are and perhaps you'll understand where your reply was irrelevant.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:19 PM
2

Yeah think about it! Rupaul pulling right up next to the urinal you're using 🤣 I feel like, and I don't know the actual statistics, but I feel like men are probably victimized in public restrooms more than women. Even on Twitter there are thousands of accounts where creeps post videos of unsuspecting men in public spas, restrooms at the urinal etc. Do we really want Laverne Cox in the restroom with our sons and nephews. Is it transphobic to ask that?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:16 PM
2

I wonder if there are any actual statistics that even support this legislation. And how would anyone know if a tranwoman uses the female room? Genital inspections?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:10 PM
0

Yes! Look into the women's restroom when they open the door, artwork on the walls, vases with potpurri. Men have no idea how much nicer women's restrooms be. But then again, women complain a lot more and that fuels a lot of policy!
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:08 PM
4

That's the point, the legislation doesn't keep anyone out of any restroom per se. It just says only one gender can be in a restroom at a time. So a woman could go into a mens restroom when it's empty but once she's in there, only women can be in there and men will then be restricted.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:06 PM
36

Notice all of the anti trans legislation focuses on male to female rather than female to male.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 07:19 PM
1

I didn't imply anything. I clearly stated that none of "these people" were worthy of deportation. Your confusion comes in at the definition of "these people." "These people" being the specific individuals named and detailed IN THE FUCKING ARTICLE. Okay? And other than being law abiding, legal immigrants like i mentioned, I'm not sure how they could possibly be any purer. Do they need to be virgins? I mean, this is America so when you imply that a law abiding, legally residing immigrant is not as…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 07:05 PM
1

OH blah blah blah! Left wing this and feminism that! Illegal immigration, goddammit GEORGE FLOYD? I'm surprised you didn't somehow put him in there too! Do you have something to say that pertains to the topic at hand? Or are your paranoid delusions about illegal immigration too taxing to allow you to have a civilized complex and nuanced discussion?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:57 PM
0

I'm not at all concerned of who who I anger. 💪
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:50 PM
1

https://abcnews.go.com/US/venezuelans-deported-week-included-8-women-returned-us/story?id=120111090#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17429681456153&csi=0&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2FUS%2Fvenezuelans-deported-week-included-8-women-returned-us%2Fstory%3Fid%3D120111090
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:48 PM
1

Join Intaction. They are preparing a federal lawsuit challenging circumcision on constitutional grounds. That case however was moreso about a birthing plan that she signed and consented to before researching circumcision and later changing her mind. The judge essentially forced her to stick to the contract rather than ruling on the merits of the circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 06:43 PM
-8

I dont see the issue so long as they have a similar policy for fathers on farhers day
/r/MensRights27/03/25 02:51 PM
1

I didn't suggest a vote for you, brother. All I did was state facts and the major point of this thread pertains to American citizens. Also, breaking the law is not enforcing the law so go ahead and vote for man hating conservatives and let's see if your life improves at all.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:50 PM
1

Or we could get the pigs in charge to follow the actual laws currently in place that make doing anything in El Salvador irrelevant.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:48 PM
1

You are guilty of spewing hot air that has no basis in facts and reality.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:27 PM
2

You are free to do your research where it shows Venezuelan male immigrants who have NO CRIMINAL RECORD for the years they've been here, working individuals with jobs and families who are here LEGALLY and have no gang ties, are being sent to foreign prison. (Those are all verifiable facts that can be checked) Please point out where I said or even remotely implied that "every person loaded on those planes was pure as the wind driven snow" The point is they don't have to be "white and pure" in orde…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:27 PM
4

That wasn't his first mention. I believe it was on the campaign trail when he made similar remarks referencing a man who pushed a woman on subway tracks
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:02 PM
1

I think it's important for you to be made aware that just because someone doesn't wipe Trumps ass with their tongue, like you, doesn't mean it's liberal propaganda. Also, conservatives do not get to gatekeep mens rights. Mens rights pertains to EVERYONE that was born male so if you have nothing of VALUE to contribute to the conversation, please stay in your Trump batecave and do something else between edging sessions other than commenting dumb shit on my posts. Thanks!
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:59 PM
-6

Except for the White House but unfortunately that's our reality.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:51 PM
0

Bro, learn how to read the actual post and what it says, then perhaps your reply will be relevant and therefore worthy of further response. If you didn't want to read it, you didn't have to. And if you want to engage in childish tribal partisan politics, go to a conservative sub reddit and not one strictly about MENS RIGHTS.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 12:45 PM
1

I meant the photography itself, not the tests.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 01:28 AM
-15

Right so I guess the greater question becomes what consent was given to the pictured individuals and were they properly informed and compensated? Also, were these conscripts or volunteers
/r/MensRights22/03/25 11:33 PM
6

That point is understandable but THE point I guess is that in other countries, military exams like this might be mandatory for boys, and therefore, having this broadcast as public record would be humiliating and unjust violation of privacy rights.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 10:57 PM
-16

I see your point but I also see YouTubes point. I mean, if you go to any public beach you'll see males of all ages in similar state of dress to these guys. Any waterpark, swimming pool etc so there's an argument there. The setting is appropriate for the attire and documenting military procedures could be a public interest argument. In boxing and NFL weigh ins, similar fashion, similar photography also in school wrestling etc. It's like the ban on female nipples but not males. The entire culture …
/r/MensRights22/03/25 10:53 PM
1

You have to blame the source of the article partly. They intentionally choose a "glamorous" photo for their headline rather than the pedophiles mugshot.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 07:47 PM
1

The dudes praising this shit better have that same energy for P Diddy.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 07:45 PM
2

A recent study suggests that gay men discriminate against feminine gay men.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 11:34 AM
1

Your point is false. Male genital mutilation has never been challenged in court on an equal protection basis. The case you cited was for female genital mutilation and was dismissed because "The judge said the government did not show FGM as a commercial activity or interstate market that would be subjected to federal law, like other illegal markets." Totally different case in every way possible.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 06:27 PM
1

I dont understand that.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 11:11 AM
1

What is your point?
/r/MensRights13/03/25 11:10 AM
1

Sex discrimination is based on the 14th amendment
/r/MensRights13/03/25 01:24 AM
5

It actually is going to happen but don't worry, you are not mentioned in the lawsuit at all. They already have the case prepared and are $30,000 into their $50,000 goal. I suggest you explore the link and it's resources detailing the the entire mastermind plan. You have a government wanting to cut medicaid, a declining circumcision rate, an increasingly pro foreskin culture thanks to porn and immigrants 🤣, mens equality is an increasingly popular topic, the CDC has been exposed as fraudulent, th…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:12 PM
5

The science, facts, statistics, and evidence and testimony against circumcision are overwhelming. This is a carefully detailed lawsuit and once the facts are revealed, FGM and MGM are essentially the same thing and judges will really have to jump through a lot of hoops to justify continuing the practice on any of the common legal grounds. The lawyers chose Oregon because it has a low circ rate, Medicaid doesn't cover it there so it's not considered medically necessary then they have a law outlaw…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:03 PM
2

There are legal challenges to the selective service pending. Why do people always engage in whataboutery when it comes to male genital mutilation. Ending this, is the first step to having men viewed as human beings rather than livestock on a social level which is essential to any progress regarding male equality to females under the law. If you can't even have the tip of your own penis, good luck with anything else.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 03:53 PM
7

They specifically chose to focus on non-religious male genital mutilation under the 14th amendment. The religious aspect is another legal matter pertaining to the freedom to practice, which is a much harder case to win because of course the, well you know.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 03:50 PM
15

Men need to start complaining. One thing women will do is complain. Her order wasn't right? She's going to the little survey, calling the hotlines and waiting 30 mins to speak with a representative etc. Women jump through hoops to complain over everything. Men don't ever say a word. Men will just eat the food if the order is wrong. There just needs to be a cultural shift where Men start to learn from Karen 🤣
/r/MensRights10/03/25 06:57 AM
1

Who said that or implied it in any way because I did not. I'm simply telling you why conservatives oppose it. If it was just for women, they would be right on board. Traditional conservatives are not a mens rights friend.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 05:52 AM
-32

Women were not mentioned in the article, transgender people and ethnic minorities are mentioned and that is why conservatives oppose it.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 03:47 PM
2

Female genital mutilation is an umbrella term for all forms of female genital alteration, while male circumcision is a specific form of male genital mutilation so it's false to compare those two things. Fgm is not "primarily" the removal of the clitoris. The most often performed types of FGM are less severe than male circumcision and often involve no more than a ritual nick. No infant is at risk of acquiring any STD including AIDS, through their penises and there is NO evidence whatsoever that's…
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:37 PM
7

I dont know, white men have received a lot of criticism but in every statistical category, black men fare worse and and treated worse than anyone all throughout society.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 08:26 PM
0

Not relevant to the point. The point being that every man does not a soldier make, while some women make excellent soldiers. Which is the entire point of opposing a male only draft.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 04:55 PM
1

Tell me why you think someone like Richard Simmons or Ru Paul had to sign up for selective service but Rhonda Rousey and Laila Ali did not. How does that make sense to you? Why does an 18 year old male child have to dign up for selective service but a female police officer or fire fighter does not. Do you think Mister Rodgers could ever beat Queen Latifah in physical combat at any stage of his life? I think tf NOT! 🤣
/r/MensRights02/03/25 04:51 PM
4

Soldiers fight wars, including the thousands of women serving in combat roles across the world as we speak.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 12:27 AM
2

Have a good day!
/r/MensRights02/03/25 12:10 AM
3

You do understand the notion of CONTEXT, Correct? No reasonable person would read my post and assume anything about it is supportive of infant circumcision in any capacity
/r/MensRights01/03/25 07:17 PM
4

Not comparable as I use the term for clarity while they use the term for deception.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 03:34 PM
49

Wikipedia, on the topic of circumcision in general is clearly biased in favor of circumcision. It 100% propaganda designed to make mutilating males seem like the noble and educated thing to do.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 08:03 PM
0

Not really, feminine men and trans would take the females place
/r/MensRights28/02/25 06:39 PM
2

Gay dudes would be in heaven
/r/MensRights28/02/25 06:39 PM
84

An uplifting message only to butter men up for when they conscript us to Iran. No policy that favors men is going to come from this. Whenever conservatives highlight the differences between men and women, that means oppression is coming.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:12 PM
9

Imagine having your bones broken after already having the tip of your penis clamped and sliced off.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 08:28 PM
0

This has been debunked.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:43 PM
6

I read today that the keratin layer that forms on the circumcised penis can be up to 3 times thicker than the typical latex condom.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 10:34 PM
2

I'm 37, and it's been that way for me for the longest. I've never had a single friend as an adult didnt have any in Highschool and don't even know what friendship would feel like at this point. I'm just accustomed to being alone now and thought I was okay with it until my 37th birthday this year when even my parents forgot lmao then I had sort of a crisis lol
/r/MensRights23/11/24 04:24 AM
-2

No, I'm pretty sure the cop is a white man
/r/MensRights18/11/24 12:10 PM
24

He's black https://news3lv.com/amp/news/local/im-disgusted-family-of-man-killed-in-police-shooting-condemns-department-seek-justice
/r/MensRights18/11/24 12:06 PM
158

The question is also will the officer be charged for this blatant execution? This was, at least, very poor judgment on behalf of the officer. But I feel like the officer just wanted to kill a man. There was no reason for that! The knife was held behind their heads in a non imminent position. Yet the officer fired 2 seconds after issuing any commands. Then, he walks up and "finishes" when clearly there was no threat at that point?.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:59 PM
4

Are you in the U.S? Seems to me that it's illegal to list job opportunities for "women only."
/r/MensRights14/11/24 02:50 PM
8

It largely depend on the type of flowers. Red roses would be inappropriate.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 07:19 PM
1

Because despite the several previous cases of male students vs public school systems that have been tried, none of them made it to the Supreme Court and they have not ruled on this issue. It's crazy because boys have to go to school until age 18, so this essentially makes it illegal for boys to have long hair even outside of school because it's not like you can just instantly grow it back once school is over. Even during summer break, that's only 3 months of growth and you still have to chop it …
/r/MensRights19/10/24 06:54 PM
1

Perhaps you should learn to love yourself and stop projecting your own self hatred of the traditional feminine role due to your lack of ability to fulfill it.
/r/MensRights19/10/24 06:48 PM
35

It's because "MEN" is not considered a political demographic. There's Conservative white men, Black Men, Gay men, And Hispanic men But no "men" in general. Men in general are not recognized as having unique issues and experiences pertaining to them. Liberals are terrified of MEN organizing under one umbrella because when we do, we will have ultimate and endless power. That's why gay men are lumped into LGBT and conveniently associated with women while black men's issues get drowned out merely in…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 03:15 PM
1

But here's my thing, they can't make them hold a gun, put on a uniform, get in an army vehicle etc. If someone is dead set on not fighting how the hell do they make them fight?
/r/MensRights14/10/24 07:34 AM
2

This is a public school district and has nothing to donwith a private school.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 10:21 AM
2

Perhaps you should educate yourself before commenting.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 02:48 PM
1

Actually. If you would've read the article before commenting, you would've noted that he is suing an entire PUBLIC school DISTRICT over it's dress code which restricts hair length for male but not female students.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 05:11 AM
10

Right. That law was inspired by another male student in that same district who also has a pending case. It's called The CROWN Act and this student tried to sue based on that law. The judge ruled that the CROWN Act does not mention either hair LENGTH or gender as a protected class. Which brings us to this suit.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 09:32 PM
19

"STUD" Is a term used for male animals that exist for the sole purpose of breeding. So STUD is this context is what she's referring to not the slang term for STUD which means a sexually virile guy who has lots of women.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 12:40 PM
1

If they were equally culpable and he gets note time then he can just sue for gender discrimination. The two are considered similarly situated.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 03:45 AM
1

Yeah but you'd have to be charged and convicted first and that hasn't happened in years.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 10:11 PM
1

There are laws in all 50 states that make it easy for the adoption industry to take babies away from fathers. The problem is not a shortage of families who want kids and are unable to have them, the problem is not enough babies are being born. The leading cause of poverty and social dysfunction is the lack of fathers in their children's live and the government seems keen on continuing that culture so long as babies are available for adoption.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 09:43 PM
2

Perhaps. But in the Islamic faith a man can be circumcised at any age while news dictate 8 days old. Also, Islam has no influence on American policy. Jewish people do.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 05:34 AM
1

Who made that assertion because I certainly did not. It has nothing to do with oppression and more to do with legal precedent and an alarmingly falling birth rate.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 05:32 AM
2

With that logic, all women already have access to birth control In the sense that they could just close their legs.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:53 PM
1

*Can't
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:50 PM
1

The supreme court can ban it. But they could and likely would uphold a ban by congress.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:49 PM
1

No more accidental fathers is what I meant and the context suggests.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:17 PM
1

I think it's since been changed or repealed. I'll have to find the case. It was decided in the 80's so likely updated by now.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:16 PM
1

The logic was that only men can impregnate someone and the government had interest in reducing teen pregnancy.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:04 PM
1

That's fine. As long as men have choices to avoid being trapped whatever they choose to do is their choice.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:03 PM
1

Of course there will be issues. But my general observation I still think is accurate.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:02 PM
1

That's all speculative. Of course some won't take it but I'm willing to bet that will be a small fraction. 2 we do not know how much it will cost If they wanna do that and be subject to child support then that's their choice
/r/MensRights23/12/23 02:01 PM
1

While Muslims do circumcise, they do not usually do so on infants and they are not actually part of the American circumcion lobby. There are confirmed Jewish individuals who are critical in ensuring a pro circumcision culture in the medical industry.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 01:13 PM
2

I feel like the Jewish lobby is the main reason behind it all.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 12:57 AM
1

That's the point, North Carolina law specifically forbids covering "routine, ritual or religious" circumcision. By including HIV prophylaxis as a "medically necessary" classification, it means any parent can just say they want it done to prevent AIDS and medicaid will cover it. Which essentially makes it routine circumcision. Medically necessary is SUPPOSED to mean that there is an actual medical issue that can be treated. IE recurring urinary tract infections etc. Circumcision as AIDS prophylax…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 12:55 AM
5

Yes, in North Carolina law medicaid is forbidden from paying for ritual, routine and religious circumcision, so they deemed it "medically necessary" so medicaid could cover it.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:27 PM
1

Right, when you think of "women" politically, you think of black, white, Hispanic, lesbians and even trans males. But politically, when people think of "men" I believe images of wealthier middle aged white conservative men come to mind. We need to change that.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:19 AM
1

I disagree. I never saw myself as being in competition with men in general. I've competed with individuals but this idea that "men" are too busy "competing" to work together on issues is hard for me to grasp.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 01:13 AM
1

I think that's overthinking it. We are not competing with each other any more than we are competing with women who work, own businesses and participate in society. It's not like there's a limited number of dollars out there to be made and we gotta hurry and grab as much before the next man does. What's happening is the men's rights movement is actively being resisted and shadowbanned by the mainstream powers that be. They muddy the waters by labeling criminal justice reform a black issue. They p…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 09:40 PM
1

There are more women than men and while theoretically a man could produce that many children, it's not likely that most men would do that and you must consider that women still have the right to abortion. Also, Immigrants, most of them women and children are in plentiful supply and are eager to come here, also, eggs can be extracted, stored and later fertilized and incubated and gestated. These are not tribal times. Also, while society may view men as expendable, we are not many of us have skill…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 09:30 PM
4

I was just thinking this today. The media likes to distract from mens issues by focusing on the gay or the black and ignoring the fact that these are MEN! The criminal justice reform movement helps all MEN more than it helps black women. Gay men are MEN and belong to the men's rights movement Once black, Hispanic, gay, white etc MALES realize that we are really all in one boat, there will never be progress. And we should rebrand from Mens rights to Men & Boy's rights. Including BOYS is accurate,…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 09:23 PM
2

Wait what? Men can't vote if they didn't register?
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:34 PM
3

North Carolina is very bad with a lot of blatantly sexist laws and policies on the books.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 03:37 PM
8

That's because anti black racism aka negrophobia and anti male sexism are both based on masculine stereotypes. Black people are seen as more masculine than any other race sonits just as easy for people to dehumanizing them as it is for people to dehumanize men. Now if you are both Black and male, you are just a demon. Bl
/r/MensRights07/12/23 03:19 PM
2

Yeah but even that makes no sense they protect religious hats but any other hat is perfectly fine including baseball caps as long as it's a not a male wearing it. Furthermore in today's climate how is it even implemented. If a trans woman and her biological female friend enter the court in identical dresses and ladies hats , do they say, oh no, you look like you were born male, you can't wear the hat but she can. I know if a lesbian stud who dresses masculine, wore a hat, she would be allowed in…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 05:31 AM
1

The difference being that you applied to that job willingly. People who have court dates have no choice. I know men that NEVER appear in public without some type of head covering and they are caught off guard in court when the bailiff makes them remove their hat in front of everyone.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:10 PM
14

Yet, a masculine woman who presents herself as a man can wear MALE streetwear with a backwards pointing baseball cap but if I entered the same courtroom wearing the same thing or even something super professional with a hat, I would not be permitted but she would so how does that fit in with decorum? The rule was created back in the day when it was controversial for a woman to appear in public in pants and not a dress. Women had dresses and large lavish hats were part of the fashion. Men wore ha…
/r/MensRights29/11/23 09:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter