TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

CuckCake321 Archive

View 11 posts and 602 comments by CuckCake321 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't really understand what you're trying to debate here tbh, the point was whether certain responsive desire can become equivalent to spontaneous desire. Well then to answer this question. No I don't think responsive desire can become the equivalent of spontaneous desire. Because in my opinion spontaneous desire is desire that comes automatically from how you look to a woman and requires no other extra steps. While responsive desire is something that isn't automatic and requires extra steps …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:30 AM
0

I just don't feel like everything is adding up. You get booty calls who came over to you during the Pandemic. But it clearly wasn't at a frequency high enough to warrant you not using the Apps. Like I said being able to essentially order women like a pizza to come to your house during a Pandemic is completely different then getting lucky here and there. Key word being lucky and then shotgun swiping on apps till you match with literally anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:18 AM
1

Why did you have to "farm" dating apps then?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:13 AM
1

Dumpster Diving and wasting countless hours on dating apps only to find a couple of women who like you is different then having women pull up to your house no questions asked during a once in a lifetime Global Pandemic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:09 AM
-2

I would argue that this "third category" you mentioned is just a runner up prize and really no better than being a Betabuxxer. Most men will never know true female desire and the lengths they will go to for a man they're attracted too. Just as an example of how women will do anything for a Chad. I read stories on here during the Pandemic that women were sneaking out of their homes during lockdown to hook up with Chads. So if she isn't willing to risk her life and health to be with you it's just …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 11:03 AM
7

Lmao unfeminine. What happened to breaking out of traditional gender roles? Guess only women can do that huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 09:08 PM
1

1) except it isn’t. If it wax you would t be asking them out in a date after approaching. This is too complicated?! What are you even saying here. You can't even spell correctly. 2) Men GET to make the first move. You get to select exactly who YOU want to ask out. Every date a man goes on is with a woman he thought was pretty enough to approach. And those that can’t? Cool. Like I said- fucking isn’t for the afraid No Men HAVE to make the first move or literally nothing happens. Big difference. 3…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:17 PM
1

1) what did you say it was? Talking? Oh wow: that’s not dating then. 1) I said Approaching is dating. Because if you don't approach someone to ask for a date then there isn't going to be a date. 2) I posted what most people do and said we all know SOME. And you jumped all on that. What did I say happens most often? 2) You putting anything in parentheses doesn't negate the fact that men make the first move. Men plan the dates. Men reserve the restaurants. And even drive the women there in some ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:02 PM
1

1) calling the “approach” dating is like calling the test drive a car purchase. Bruh, it’s not the date yet. You know how we know: she hasn’t said yes or no yet! Except we aren't test driving cars we are talking to human beings here duh? 2) what assumptions?! That men won’t do these things?! There is a reason hopefully was put into parentheses: we know some dudes don’t and go “why she ghost after”? I dunno Cheeto stained anime shirt? Maybe because you told her you were sloppy without using words…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:51 PM
5

Yeah but how am I gonna know that when I just met them? Like I said the reason men take women to restaurants is because it's a neutral place everyone likes. If I go by your logic and just take them where I like to go. It could be to a Porn Convention and now I am getting arrested.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:25 PM
7

You aren’t even describing dating. You are describing the effort into an approach. Bruh, that’s not a date!! Approaching women isn't a part of dating? Tell me genius how does a date happen if you don't ask someone to go on a date in the first place? A date is where a dude pick out a place to take a girl, then (hopefully) cleans up and showers and puts on (hopefully) nice clean clothes on. These are all assumptions you're making to mitigate the effort men have to put in. While she showers, waxes,…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:21 PM
5

No I'm not. Because not every woman is gonna be into what I am into. Especially if I am just getting to know them. So your whole thing of just take them where you plan on going to somehow remove the effort men have to put in doesn't work. Like what if I like going to Porn Conventions? You want me to take my first date to a Porn Convention?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:15 PM
24

Dating apps are an absolute nightmare for the majority of men. And they still have to make the first move. Just online. Like you guys are so lazy you can't even be bothered to type words on your phone to a man Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:11 PM
9

Why didn't you plan the first date? Exactly my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:10 PM
9

Lmao what? What if I planned on going to a stripclub. I can't take a girl on a date there. Stop being facetious. You know what I am saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:08 PM
15

Except that doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:59 PM
10

You forgot to add the date planning restaurant reservation and flower buying that men have to do. But okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:57 PM
10

It actually is when you're not doing the approaching. Not paying for drinks. Not planning dates. It's very easy to just exist and look for a partner by sitting there. Which is what women are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:51 PM
18

All of my single friends at some point have dated men who put no effort into planning the date, asked 0 questions or made any effort to keep the conversation going and still expected to be invited back to her place or have a second date Yeah those men are dating like women now. Sucks to be on the other side of the fence huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:49 PM
19

We constantly hear women saying they aren't gonna cook, clean or do anything for a man nowadays. Have you been living under a rock?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:46 PM
18

Does this lady game involve making the first move? Planning the date? Reserving the Restaurant? Buying the flowers? Probably not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:44 PM
15

At the end of the day the person who actually moves their body towards someone and initiates is putting in more effort. And how do women put more effort into relationships when women now don't even do half the things that women of previous generations did. Most women don't cook for a man or clean for a man or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:42 PM
24

Lmao "lady game". You mean sitting on your ass and doing nothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:39 PM
5

Rest assured if all these women who dated Older Men and they were all ultra rich CEOs we wouldn't hear a peep about this. Like I said before the Older Men they dated just turned out to be losers compared to other Older Men. They just didn't know it at the time.Thus the saltiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 03:44 PM
2

A lot of women are just mad because the "Older Man" they dated was a 7/11 Manager and at the time they thought he was so mature and cool because he had a car and shitty apartment when what they really wanted was an Older Man who was a CEO of a company and mega rich and successful. But hindsight is 20/20.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 03:36 PM
3

Highschool and College are really the best times for men to make friends and get dates. After that it gets progressively harder. And now since College attendance for Men has been dropping steadily for years. Highschool was their one and only shot at getting friends and a relationship. Thus why we are seeing so many young men ages 19-20 give up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 03:12 PM
9

You might have really struggled socially and struggled to make friends but if you are that awkward you can’t make friends, you’ve no chance of finding a woman to like you. You actually have to be able to have a conversation and be able to engage socially. How else would you be able to have a relationship with anybody? The issue with this is that it's only applicable to men. Men are the ones who have to be social. They're the ones who have to make the first move. So many women who have Autism and…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:59 PM
5

Once again. When all you experience is negative reinforcement. It's the logical conclusion you come too. Are you going to keep trying to hangout with someone if they always say no? Like I said you look at the actions of these men and think it's their fault for choosing to rot in their rooms. Yet you never looked at the causes that led them to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:49 PM
0

The rotting in their room comes from years of romantic and socializing failures. No one just wakes up one day and says I'm never leaving my room.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:45 PM
3

So you have absolutely no proof of your claims? Also, why would the majority of women say they had terrible hook ups and didn’t orgasm unless theyre telling the truth? Lol neither do you. Your whole post is hearsay based on your perspectives as a woman. I'm just giving you the male version of that. I don’t know why you think guys aren’t the same way, if not more because they typically like hook ups more than women. Most men can't get hook ups whenever they want. That's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:43 PM
6

When you are young you are more likely to go for someone who seems like a lot of fun because that’s the stage you are in your life. Translation: When you are young and your SMV is at its highest you'll go for unavailable Chad's while your future Husband rots in his room. As you get older, you want someone who is going to be on the same page as you, who also wants stability, to settle down and have a family with you. It’s not a gendered thing Translation: Chad's no longer wants to even have sex w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:37 PM
3

That’s a lie because the majority of kids (in my country) are raised by two parent households Yeah those kids are probably being raised by a beta simp step father and a mother who just got with him because she was priced out of the market after becoming a single mom. The vast majority dont. How many women do you know that would be completely up front about their sexual history if it makes them look bad to a potential boyfriend? It's always "Oh I had my fun in College. But now I am looking for a …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:34 PM
14

I don't think it plays out the way you think it does. It isn't a lack of communication that causes this to happen but these women genuinely make it seem like they don't do hook ups. And most women when asked will deny that they even hook up with certain men but make others wine and dine them. They know the game. It's why you usually don't see women wake up to Chad's games until they become single mothers and are over 30. Then all of a sudden they now want the nice and stable guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 01:23 PM
7

I mean most of us come from middle class backgrounds because our parents were middle class. Our Father's clearly didn't have any issues getting dates while being middle class. This is a whole new issue that has been created because of dating apps and the globalization of dating in general. Our Dad's would be Incels if they had to date in this current climate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 05:37 PM
0

Well most of the qualities that make men in the top 10% like height, race and bone structure aren't something you can work hard to achieve. You're born with it. So this point doesn't really stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 04:57 PM
3

It's not made up. Do the experiment. That's my source.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 12:44 PM
6

So where's the veiled threat you mentioned?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 12:41 PM
4

So if men don't vote for the things you want they are threatening women? Funny how that works huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 12:37 PM
2

Make a dating profile with an average man and make one with a top 10% Chad and see who does better. There's your source.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 12:36 PM
3

Translation: You can't force Men to vote for your political interests. The same way you can't force Women to have sex with Men they don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 12:35 PM
-6

Never said you were. Just like Men aren't responsible for voting for the people you want in office. Voting is a very personal thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 11:28 AM
8

I mean you say women's standards aren't too high yet only the top 10% of men have a consistent sex life. While most men have pretty much nothing at all. So something isn't adding up here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 11:02 AM
3

I mean I'm not doing anything. I actually voted for Kamala so chill. I've also read the entire Project 2025 book. And if you think Roe V Wade was bad. It's going to get a million times worse to be an American Woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:48 PM
3

Yeah Roe V Wade and Trump getting elected definitely showed them. Hopefully their voting doesn't cause more bad things to happen to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:44 PM
2

Those are RedPill men and MGTOWS who say that. Incels constantly complain about being alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:40 PM
-3

No I think single men can occupy their time with whatever they like. If it just so happens a lot of them get into politics because they're single and have nothing better to do so be it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:38 PM
0

I mean you guys are always the ones to say life's unfair. So yes it shouldn't be surprising that men start taking up interests in other things when women aren't around to occupy their time.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 11:23 PM
2

Like I said almost everyone else outside of PPD who talk about the Male Loneliness Epidemic say it has to do with not being able to get women and get into romantic relationships. Only on here have I been seeing people say it's about male friendships and of course the people who have been saying that are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 10:48 PM
3

Well the male loneliness epidemic is because they can't get women. It seems everyone else on here is designating it as a friendship problem. And it's fine that women don't want to help. As we have been seeing men who are lonely now just focus more on politics and getting the people they like elected then focusing on relationships and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 10:43 PM
3

You're assuming the non superficial guy is pretending. What if he feels so strongly about being non superficial he writes it in his bio? You already know the outcome of this. You can keep trying to over complicate my example to save your just world fallacy. But at the end of the day being non superficial literally doesn't matter if women don't find you attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 04:34 PM
4

Lmao someone literally made a Male Model dating profile whose bio said he was a sex offending, woman beating Nazi and he got hundreds of matches and messages. Clearly women are color blind when it comes to Chad. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 04:32 PM
5

No I said superficial men get nothing. She said prove it. So I told her to make those two profiles to see which type of man does better the superficial one or the non superficial one. We all know whose profile is gonna do better. So it's actually a great example. Because being non superficial gets you no where if women find you unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 04:16 PM
5

No I gave you the exact instructions on what to do. So do it and prove my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 04:14 PM
3

At the end of the day men are just gonna do what works Tell me where in this quote do I even mention incels? Like are you blind?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:41 PM
2

Well considering we live in a largely looks based society and dating apps are the norm. I'm sure he'll have a way easier time personality maxing. He'll definitely get more likes and matches than a 6' 6" Male Model. According to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:39 PM
2

Yandere Dev, Chris Chan, and Elliot Rodgers are men. And these are just most provable cases because we can actually look at their behavior, but they talk just like the incels claiming “Im a good boy but women just like douchey hot guys”. Okay so according to you the vast majority of Incels are mass murdering, mom fucking pedophiles? No they aren't. Yes are these guys Incels? Obviously but you can't show these guys the list you made and think they can logically follow it when they also think it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:37 PM
1

If you gave an Incel 5 years to do everything possible to look more attractive. Baring he doesn't have any sort of generic conditions. He would be way better off in those 5 years working on his looks then he would if it was his personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:27 PM
3

Bro you guys always divert from the topic at hand. You want to debate about personality. I say looks trump personality. Therefore you should work on your looks. And now we are talking about incels? You should take out the comment where you asked why a mass murderer, a man who fucked his mom and a pedophile are still Incels. Like how couldn't they be when they do shit like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:26 PM
4

What? The men you listed are severely mentally ill. One killed a bunch of people. The other had sex with his mom and the last one was a straight up pedophile. These men don't apply to the quote I made.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:22 PM
11

Okay make a dating profile with a regular dude and make his bio say he's "A non superficial and non judgemental dude." And then make another dating profile with a 6' 7" Male Model and write in his bio "I hate fat bitches" and see which one gets more likes and matches. I'll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:19 PM
3

But they dont do whats listed. They make excuses why they wont. Look at Elliot Rodgers, Yandere Dev, and Chris Chan. They never changed their ways even the problem was obvious and fixable. All these men have severe mental illnesses which I literally just said improving your looks can't help. How does that change what you said and what I said? Because if you want to argue about this list you made you should have put this list in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:17 PM
1

Well you were asking why there are still Incels if looksmaxxing is a thing and I explained it to you. But the existence of Incels isn't what I am arguing. It's that working on your looks is way more beneficial than your personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:15 PM
4

Already explained this before. But there will always be a certain group of men who can work on their looks and status and income and it still won't change their love life because they were born with genetic abnormalities like a birth defect or severe mental illness. No amount of showering can fix those.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:11 PM
5

Well your post only specifies getting a better personality so that's why I am comparing working on your looks and working on your personality and concluding that working on your looks is way more beneficial than your personality. As far as Incels. There will always be a certain group of men who can't ascend even if they do all the things you listed because of genetic factors out of their control. Like a birth defect or severe mental illness. Thus why Incels will always be a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:09 PM
13

Non superficial men still get nothing Lmao. Which is my whole point. You can work on your personality and hope that your personality attracts a niche audience of women. But that's slim pickings. While if you worked on your looks and became attractive. Now you can attract a larger audience of women to choose from. If Andrew Tate just worked on his personality he would be making PPD posts on here and asking dating coaches for face ratings.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 03:00 PM
17

At the end of the day men are just gonna do what works. If working on your personality gave men life changing results when it came to attracting women we would see Personality Boot Camps pop up all over the Internet and Therapists would be booked solid for years. Except having a good personality doesn't give nearly the same return on investment as becoming more attractive or gaining significant wealth does. Look at Andrew Tate. By your logic he should be a bonafide Incel but he isn't. Or what ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 02:54 PM
-1

You can do whatever you want. All I am saying is you'll have a way bigger return on investment if you improve your looks than if you improved your personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 10:57 PM
5

Didn't for Jeremy Meeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:16 PM
0

My singular experience doesn't negate the fact that men can get married purely for looking good. There's literally a song with the lyrics I want a man in Finance, 6' 5", Blue Eyes. Tell me where was the part about personality in there?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:15 PM
8

So the key to getting women is to just be hot. Then you can beat people half to death and women will still think I have a wonderful personality. Got it 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:07 PM
7

Nothing is going to work for you with this attitude. I mean it. NOTHING. Do you think I want to hire someone to work for me that pisses off every person they meet? Do you think someone wants to even be friends with a guy like that? Working for someone and dating someone are two completely different things. You're doing this to yourself. Stop acting like anyone else is responsible for how unlikeable you are outside of yourself. I don't know what weird tangent you're going on. All I am saying is i…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:06 PM
7

Funny how you even gave him a chance to begin with Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:59 PM
6

You didn’t answer my question I did answer your question. Now, how are you going to stay there? You need personality for that, and no woman is going to become a wife for a man who’s only redeeming quality is a good set of hair plugs. Women marry hot men with bad personalities all the time. I think it's you who needs to wake up and stop believing the lie that women actually require a man with a good personality when if he is hot enough he can act however he wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:57 PM
10

This is exactly my point. Men need to start doing what works. And having a good personality doesn't work. So work instead on becoming as attractive as you can.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:55 PM
4

So you think one piece of shit weaseling his way into being successful means you should also be a piece of shit? That's your logic? Once again ever said you have to be a piece of shit. It's just women really don't care if you're hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:53 PM
10

Why do you use a decade old example? So because an example is old it isn't valid? Hope you don't feel that way about the Suffragettes and all they did to pioneer women's rights. 😬 Also, I'm willing to bet both tits that he's got a great personality. Must have skipped the part where I said he almost beat someone to death. But yeah sure. A man who beats people almost to death surely has a wonderful personality. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:52 PM
7

They don't, but even if they did, it's telling that this is your fantasy. Okay so explain how Richard Ramirez and Ted Bundy had loads of women wanting to fuck them then? These guys literally killed women. And probably had more dating options than you. Like yeah I'd love to be hot enough that I could get any woman I wanted. But being able to treat women like shit is never part of it for me, yet it is always part of it for dudes on this sub. I never said in my post become attractive and immediatel…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:48 PM
2

Obviously all these surgeries need to be done by professionals who can give you the best results possible. All I am saying is if you did all these surgeries and they went well. You're going to see way more of a return on investment then if you didn't do these surgeries and just worked on your personality instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:41 PM
4

Women let men get away with pretty much whatever they want if they look a certain way. But God forbid they're ugly. Buried under a prison for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:38 PM
4

Tell that to Jeremy Meeks. Who almost beat someone to death. Dudes now a multi millionaire model. Wonder how good his personality is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:37 PM
8

Which is why men are getting hair transplants and limb lengthing surgeries at a rate we have never seen before. They already know a good personality will never make up for being a short bald man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:34 PM
6

Thus why you should try to never be ugly to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:32 PM
6

It's very much on topic but it's probably because it doesn't fit the narrative you're trying to express you don't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:37 PM
4

What answer? I'm just explaining how sex is just more then two people fucking but an indicator of success in other areas of a man's life. Obviously this doesn't apply to women as even a crack addict homeless woman could get laid more than a Male Ivy League Graduate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:27 PM
7

I think they don't do this because then it would expose that a large majority of a certain group of people have a criminal record. Same how they have a height filter to filter out the height of men but not a Transgender filter to filter out Transgenders for men who don't want to date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:13 PM
3

Sexual success is also a great indicator of a man's success in other areas of his life as you don't see women lining up to fuck losers who spend all day in there Mom's basement. There's a reason that men who literally have rosters of women they don't have to pay to fuck are also famous male celebrities. Despite what you think sexual success is the best indicator of overall success for men. Thus why it's viewed the way it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:59 PM
9

I think the real problem is not that women have gained all these freedoms and aren't restricted to gender roles anymore. But that women were given this autonomy while making it so men are still stuck being providers and breadwinners. All while taking all of the good jobs away through DEI hiring practices and then looking back at men with disgust when you forced them into a provider role and took away their ability to provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 10:40 AM
-6

Women only make loser men pay for things. How many women do you think would have Chris Hemsworth whine and dine them? Literally none. As soon as he said he wanted to fuck they would be at his house no questions ask. The only solution to get out of paying women is to become a Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 05:43 AM
1

Well I think if you go to a site that is known for attracting mentally ill men. Then go to said site. Dress provocatively. Pretend to be single. You can't really be upset when mentally ill men start harassing you. That's my whole point. It's an unfortunate reality we live in but you can't argue with crazy people. Like I said before. I would love to be able to not lock my car and wake up the next day to it still being in my driveway. But we just don't live in a world like that. The best way to av…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 05:36 AM
1

Yes it is. It is restricting their freedom of speech, and I support the 1st Amendment. I mean if I want to go to a neighborhood that's known for robbing people and someone says they don't want me to go because I'll get robbed. Are they restricting my freedom of speech or looking out for me? Like these women know these sites are filled with the absolute lowest of the low. Complete degenerate losers that have nothing to live for and still go there to make thousands off their pathetic existences. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 03:36 PM
1

There's this guy who makes videos on YouTube named Shelbo99 that vlogs about being Pokemane's boyfriend and how they plan on getting married. He's legitimately mentally ill and sometimes even makes videos from a hospital dressed in one of those medical gowns (which I assume is a psych ward). What's happening with him is there's someone (or several people) he's in a discord with who are impersonating pokemane, pretending to be in a relationship with him, and having him send them thousands of doll…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 03:32 PM
1

Do you believe that women shouldn't be able to dress in skimpy outfits in public too because it invites crazy men? Can people wear MAGA hats and not expect to be assaulted? This is ridiculous victim blaming. What we should be doing is providing better mental health services for the kind of men who do these things before these things happen, not restricting women's freedoms. Not being able to take advantage of mentally ill men online is hardly restricting women's freedoms. Plenty of other real jo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 03:09 PM
2

Leaving your house unlocked and performing a role for entertainment purposes arent the same thing. I'm not comparing them. You just think we live in a perfect world where crazy people don't exist. Except they do this why you don't leave your doors unlocked. And this entertainment role tends to attract scores of mentally ill men which is why I say it needs to be avoided, plenty of other ways to make money that don't involve this. The fact that you excuse and almost advocate for violence against p…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 02:24 PM
1

So now we moving the goal post from doing a job to intentionally going somewhere unsave. But it's not shifting the goal post because it's pretty common knowledge at this point that only mentally ill men spend all their time chronically online giving women money. Which is why so many people keep commenting that Men with self control and self respect would never do this. Mentally ill men lack both these traits. How do you feel about actors that play a villain in a show that get death threats and h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 01:24 PM
3

Okay so if you know there is a dangerous part of town that is known for people getting robbed. Are you still going to go there? What do you think people will say when you get to said place and get robbed. Women know the type of men that consume that kind of content. Mentally ill men. Yet they still do it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:47 PM
2

By your logic women shouldn't participate in singing competitions because they may encounter a period where they can't afford security but are famous enough to attract weirdos. Being in the public spotlight always comes with risks for men and women. But we rarely if ever hear about male content creators being assaulted and murdered for pretending to be single and horny online. It's almost like being a female content creator and having your content surround by the idea of you being single and hor…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:43 PM
2

Maybe if men cant handle themselves they shouldn't be allowed out in public where they are a danger to someone doing their job. If men stalk, harass, assault, kill etc. Maybe the best practice would be to keep them locked up inside. Every man has to go through a very strict mental evaluation to proof he isnt a threat to the rest of normal society. Just so society doesnt have to entertain these dangerous creatures anymore. Then we could all just do our job with the normal people that want to enga…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:39 PM
2

The difference is all these other performers had an actual security team that keeps them from being killed. Grimmie was an upcoming singer who didn't have the money yet to afford that. And most female streamers aren't making the kind of money that can afford a 24/7 security team. So the best thing they can do is to avoid streaming entirely and get a real job with less risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:43 AM
5

So we can excuse violence towards any public figure if they have an audience? Because any audience might attract any mentally ill person. Tell me does every public figure exploit lonely and mentally ill men for money? You guys keep leaving this part out. Also it is victim blaming. A couple of years ago a guy broke into the house of a female content creator and wanted to kill her and her boyfriend. She was openly dating and in a relationship. She never hid that fact. He was probably one of her to…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:39 AM
1

Big difference between two people engaging in a consensual kink and a woman pretending to be single and available for mentally ill men online for money.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:27 AM
2

Again, it doesn’t matter what content you do, your not expected to be attacked for it. Once again this is like being mad you can't leave your car unlocked at night. Mentally ill men aren't going away so the best thing to do is avoid them. And one of the ways you can do that is by not exploiting them for money online. I'm not voting for locking up mentally ill people, how about we just hold them accountable for their own actions instead of blaming everyone else? If mentally ill men could hold the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:19 AM
3

Exactly why my post title is Men who part with their money easily are always mentally ill.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:08 AM
3

No one cares what these men think, their not entitled to just attack people You're right no one is entitled to just attack people. But when you do this sort of content you're putting yourself at risk. No one is entitled to steal my car. But I'm still going to lock it after I get out. Because we don't live in a perfect world. If they can’t understand it’s a performance and she’s doing it for money, they shouldn’t be all around people Thus why they're mentally ill Lmao. No sane man is giving women…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 11:05 AM
3

Apart from going to war, no job is risking your safety, you are excusing this attackers behaviour. She can dress and act however she wants, it’s a performance, he knows that too. You think if these men actually thought there was no chance of having sex with them or being their boyfriends they would still donate thousands of dollars to them? Why is it that these female streamers never post their boyfriends on their social media pages and constantly say they're single and want a boyfriend when the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 10:57 AM
3

But there is a big difference between making music and pretending to be single online for money. These attract two completely different audiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 10:49 AM
1

So again, a women doing her job in a public setting should be expected to be assaulted? You're completely glossing over the fact that getting money for existing from mentally ill losers online isn't a "normal job." When your job is dressing up provocatively online and pretending to be single and horny online. It's going to come with risks. What about the hundreds of others that didn’t feel the need to attack her? When you're dealing with thousands of men online. There's always going to be one wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 10:48 AM
10

That's my point. Only mentally ill men display this lack of self control.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 10:33 AM
4

Did you even read my post? I never said random women should expect to get assaulted. My whole argument is that women who make tons of money online for existing off the backs of mentally ill losers shouldn't be surprised when these men act like mentally ill losers in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 10:32 AM
0

But see this is the exact point I am trying to make. Men are more than just testosterone. You can't just take male hormones and suddenly understand the male experience and how men think. When you transition from a woman to a man you still retain your understanding of being female and what it's like to be a woman. So it makes you more understanding of women's issues and empathetic thus why you wouldn't turn into a horny animal just because you took testosterone because you understand women. It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:15 PM
0

But why don't we see Trans Man becoming rapists and visiting prostitutes when they go on Testosterone?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:01 PM
2

Okay so if I take estrogen then can I start having a widdle period? Can I get a widdle pregnant as well? You're in complete denial that having a penis and testicles that naturally produce testosterone is the same as you taking shots. As soon as you stop those shots your estrogen goes back up because that's what you naturally produce. You're still a woman. Just a woman with higher than normal testosterone levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:00 PM
2

But the vast majority of rapists and prostitute users are biological men though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:56 PM
1

It's laughable you think you can compare a clitoral erection to an erection from a penis. Also women don't ejaculate semen when they have a wet dream. And wet dreams serve a hormonal purpose of regulating hormones and maintaining reproductive health for men. Like I said this is no different than if I took estrogen and said I knew what it's like to have a period and be pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:44 PM
2

You act like having a penis and balls doesn't cause hormonal processeses as well. Like wet dreams and spontaneous erections that don't go away until you masturbate. All unique experiences that only a biological male can have. You can't replicate these by just taking testosterone. And these experiences absolutely shape the way men view and try to acquire sex because they have this rock hard piece of flesh in their pants and balls screaming at them to procreate. If I took estrogen I could never re…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:30 PM
8

I just don't think you can replicate the male experience by taking testosterone. It would be like if I said I know what having a period is like because I took estrogen. I simply never will because I wasn't born with a vagina and don't have a reproductive system.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:18 PM
6

You're missing a massive component of being a male which is having a penis and balls. So just because you took testosterone you still couldn't fully feel what it was like having testosterone and having an erection as well. Completely different experience. That I'm sure if you did have you would actually understand why men get so horny to the point of paying for sex and being down horrendous simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:11 PM
5

Yeah but the friendzone is still voluntary. If you don't want to get used for money and favors just walk away.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:47 PM
16

The problem with this post is that you're assuming when a woman friendzones a guy she wants a genuine friendship after. When 99% of the time this is just the nice way of saying I am not attracted to you without saying it. Because you'll notice most of the time if you ever do take up a woman on her offer of friendship. The friendship will be completely one sided and she'll eventually stop talking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 11:41 AM
1

Most of them aren't that attractive to me since he is into bigger girls too but his on and off again ex he's been with the longest was pretty good looking Well then it's because she's fat and ugly like him then. So they're looks matched. This was more so to explain why a fat short ugly man is with a hot chick. Also if she is fat then she isn't going to be pretty good looking in a conventional sense. I'm talking about a slim attractive woman with a fat out shape ugly man. Those are the types of r…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 07:22 PM
13

But you know the outcome. Chad's are usually assholes because they can get away with it. Ugly Men are good because women absolutely are not going to put up with a man who is both ugly and an asshole. Thus why my experiment proves it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:56 PM
1

This is all cool. But you still don't know if he is giving her money. So none of this really matters if he is paying her. Because once the money stops she is gone.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:48 PM
28

Good make a Ugly Man Dating Profile and write that he's a Pro feminist and he donated to Kamala and believes in Women's Rights and then make a Male Model Dating Profile and write in the bio he likes to beat women for fun and is a registered sex offender and see who gets more likes and matches. I'll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:42 PM
1

Men take what they can get. So it's more out of desperation if anything. Women have hundreds if not thousands of options thanks to Online Dating. And yet still end up dating and having sex with women beaters and sex offenders because they're hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:29 PM
5

everyone who's not chad is a loser then i guess? I mean if you're paying for pussy in general you're a loser. i know a guy who only does sugar dating because he cba going on dates and all that, even though he can easily attract good looking women. not DMing 'sup' and having women come over level (vast majority of men can't do that regularly ainec) but he's definitely above average, successful and has game. He clearly is not that good looking or has game if he is using Sugar Dating Sites. Plus ga…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 06:26 PM
2

Breaking news!! Women will actively overlook a man who harms children and beats women if he is hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:22 PM
1

The Male Model who said he was a child molester and women beater got 500 likes. So I am going off those numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:20 PM
1

But that's not what happens. The Ugly Guy will get 4 likes and the Women Beater Model will get 400 likes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:18 PM
8

Lmao a Sugar Daddy absolutely is a loser. Imagine paying hundreds if not thousands of dollars for sex. When Chad just DMs a girl "Sup" and he's hitting it raw for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:16 PM
1

If it's generalization how do I know that if I made a dating profile with a Model Model and wrote in his bio that he beats women and then made another dating profile and it was a Short Ugly Man and made his bio that he's a Pro Feminist the Male Model Women Beater would get way more like and matches than the Short Ugly Pro Feminist Man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:09 PM
0

Dude probably paid for her. If you ever run into him again. Ask how much he gives her as an allowance. 9 times out of 10 a short bald man with a hot girl is a Sugar Daddy Loser who has to pay his way into a woman's pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:06 PM
9

I mean there's a cultural component as to why that happens. But if you made a dating profile with a male model who says he beats women for fun and a dating profile of a man who says he's a card carrying feminist. The Male Model Women Beater will get a million times more likes and matches than the Ugly Pro Feminist Man would.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:04 PM
0

I mean could you logically give me a reason why a woman would stay with a man who beats the absolute shit out of her when she had multiple nice well to do men wanting to be in a relationship with her? It's because this only makes sense when you look at it from an emotional perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:00 PM
17

Men will line up for a woman regardless of her looks because of desperation. Which is funny because men take what they can get. Men don't have women approaching them. They don't have that luxury. So a lot of times men will end up with bad women simply because that's all they could realistically get. While with women they have thousands of likes and matches from Dating Apps. Men approaching them in real life and they still will pick woman beating sex offenders if he is hot. Kind of crazy if you t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 04:57 PM
10

No. But you wouldn't see women line up for a man who beats women and commits sex crimes if he was ugly. My point being is these things must not be that bad to them. If all a man has to do to be forgiven is be hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 04:47 PM
14

No silly. Only ugly men are bad. If you're hot you can beat women and commit disgusting sex crimes and have a line of women waiting to sleep with you. ☺️
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 04:42 PM
-4

Women aren't logical thinkers. They think emotionally. That's why most don't regret leaving the nice guy. Because to them him being boring is worse than a guy who is abusive. Because at least the abusive guy can generate emotions in her. There's a saying "You can be anything to a woman. Just don't be boring."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 04:41 PM
67

Women don't like good men. Because good men are usually ugly. Someone did an Online Dating Experiment where they used a Male Models photos for a dating profile and wrote in the bio that he was a convicted child molester and women beater. So apparently women will date a child molester and women beater if they're hot. But God forbid a man is short. Lmao absolute meme gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 04:28 PM
–

She is probably for having blind bus drivers too Lmao. Don't want to be ableist as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:21 PM
–

The short female cop is less of a threat for most people that are just looking fir a fight snd are more likely to be able to defuse the situation No the short female cop is gonna get her gun taken from her and used on herself and other officers. Likely the fat firefighter is going to be great for holding the ladder What if because of his weight he can stand for long periods of time to hold a ladder? Last time I checked it takes longer then a couple minutes to put out a fire.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:19 PM
–

Tell me how a short female cop is supposed to stop crime? Or how a fat firefighter is going to be able to put out a fire and pull people to safety when they can't even bend down to tie their shoes. Certain jobs have certain requirements for a reason. And it's not sexist or racist for them to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 01:04 PM
2

OP thinks Men are the only violent, aggressive things to exist. Must have never heard of bears or mountain lions or alligators Lmao. Trying telling them to stop being so emotional. The world is still a very dangerous place. It's just men have given women the privilege of being protected from outside threats like dangerous animals and even foreign invaders. And all the women here are so tough until a war breaks out and they're the first ones to leave. What happened? I thought you guys were equal …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:37 PM
20

My favorite part about this post is that for this to work. We would have to make Men disappear right when all the cities were made. The roads were paved and the electricity was running. If women had to survive at the dawn of civilization they absolutely would have not made it. So OPs point doesn't work because it is contingent on Men disappearing in modern times when everything is built up already.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 09:12 PM
–

I'm a proud Transfat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:14 AM
–

I mean men aren't objects to be used either. And if their dating lives are suffering you shouldn't expect them to show up to rallies and protests for women's issues either.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 06:14 AM
–

I don't understand how you can say nothing is free in this world but then expect all these other things. Which is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:59 AM
–

That's a good theory. But the economy never really bounced back pre 2008 housing crash. So most kids Gen Z and Millennials had parents that both worked. So it's possible Millennials could have also been raised by their Boomer Grandparents. And the majority of Millennial Man voted Democrat when they became of age to vote. So that doesn't really explain the whole story.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:52 AM
–

Look at Brad Pitts brother. A totally average looking guy compared to his brother Brad. Like I said both genes are being mixed. If somehow it could be that only the pro athletes genes get passed on I would agree. But we also have to think about the mom's genes as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:39 AM
–

I mean clearly we live in a society where fat acceptance is pushed. And while it's called "fat acceptance". It should really be called "female fat acceptance". Because no woman is accepting any sort of fat man or else we would have seen fat male models on billboards and magazines which we don't. So this makes me wonder if we have fat acceptance. Where is short acceptance? Clearly society is willing to change the narrative around being a obese female. But we don't see the same done for short men?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:37 AM
–

We are still a long ways off from being able to correctly predict the future height of someone. And while having a Tall Father is a great indicator of inheriting the Tall gene. Most women who date Tall men are short. So we have both parents genes to think about. And who is to say the son gets his Father's genes. He could get his mother's.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:31 AM
–

Seriously. "My 5'4" son will have no problem with dating because I will raise him to not hate women! " Forgetting about the multiple experiments we have seen where they take a Tall Male Models photos and use them on a dating app. And add the Bio "Former women beater and convicted rapist" and still get flooded with likes and matches. I wonder what tall tale will be spun to explain to her 5' 4" son why his Pro feminist dating profile hasn't gotten likes or matches in months while a 6' 6" Model can…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:28 AM
–

Well what's interesting is Gen Z Men are way more Conservative than Millennial Men are. Hell they could be even more Conservative than Boomers. But what's interesting about this is that Tinder came out in 2012. And while Millennials were early adopters. This is pretty much the standard way Gen Z dates. And it seems that with dating getting much harder because of Tinder and other dating apps it also coincides with more Gen Z Men becoming Conservative. So pre Tinder when dating was easier we had m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:14 AM
–

I mean if nothing is going to change whether Roe V Wade was in place or not. Same thing with Trump. I don't see how this wouldn't be the conclusion they come too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:00 AM
–

I mean most men weren't getting laid before this. So withdrawing sex is hardly a punishment for them. Plus we all know that this won't affect Chad's ability to get laid. So let me check. Most men are currently getting nothing. Chad is still getting everything. Sounds like nothing really has changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:25 AM
–

I mean that's why I am asking this question. What is the most realistic path? And from the answers I got it seems like the same platitudes I have heard before. Which is fine. I didn't expect the women here to really think about this. But I can't help but find a correlation between Roe V Wade being overturned and Trump getting back into office with the current dating landscape Men are experiencing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:10 AM
–

Hell yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 03:07 AM
–

Lmao damn. You should visit rshort to get the temperature on what the dating landscape is for short men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:41 AM
–

It's over
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:05 AM
–

Well you did say after all that being a human is brutal. So I guess they will have to dust themselves off and try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:01 AM
–

I see a lot of women thinking they can cheat having a genetic dead end by having kids with a tall man. But a lot of times the women are significantly shorter than the man. Like 5 ft something. So while a tall fathers genes do play a role in their future sons height. So does the short mother. And it's entirely possible they get the mother's short genes over the fathers tall genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:46 AM
–

This is such an empty platitude. "Men are hunters". And "Women are Gatherers" . But if I say because of that they should really be spending more time in the kitchen and getting groceries to feed the family suddenly I'm the asshole. Also you do realize this whole men are hunters biological angle your playing is from a time when by Men "hunting" they took what they wanted no questions asked. If men tried this in modern day they would be in prison.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:42 AM
–

Women really have no idea bro. Just go on rsmallpenis and you'll see half the guys there either permanently checked out of life or are planning too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:34 AM
–

I think it's easy to take this stance when most of the men you dated probably approached you. And if you approached them it's because they were like 6'5" or something. Women even know how brutal the dating market is as there is a height requirement for men to even donate sperm.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:09 AM
–

But also never having a partner can significantly impact your mental health. So there's that angle too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:59 AM
–

Feminist in the streets. SS Officer in the sheets. 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:56 AM
–

Broooootall
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:55 AM
–

The disability pill is a brutal one to swallow. Especially since Autistic Women don't even come close to having the same dating issues as Autistic Men do. Most Autistic Women are in relationships and have had multiple partners compared to their male counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:53 AM
–

While it's true having a girlfriend isn't the be all end all. It's a significant part of anyone's life when they find a partner. Male or Female. So to say that getting a girlfriend won't solve all a man's problems is true. It would definitely help relieve a lot of them if he had someone by his side to face it with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:50 AM
–

Well to be fair. We are talking about men's dating issues. And the women's future sons who could experience these same issues. And if anything it will probably get worse. Online Dating already ruined dating for most people. I can't imagine whatever technology they create to rival Online Dating will see Men have the same amount of success women do when it comes to dating online.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:48 AM
–

That's a pretty cold response to give your future son. And yes everyone does have small failures. But for some it can be a lifetime's worth. Life isn't fair and nothing is guaranteed. after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:44 AM
–

This is a good answer. Dating is so brutal for men you're better off not risking having a son who could end up a virgin loser and goes crazy over it. Now instead of dealing with them till they're 18. It's now a life sentence of driving them to and from psychiatrist appointments.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:42 AM
–

That's a big ask for your future son. Especially when he is in his teens and 20s. Maybe since you're a woman it's an easier thing to do. But Testosterone is a very powerful hormone. I have seen women on here who have transitioned to men go on TRT and say how they don't know how most men are even able to handle the level of horniness they now feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:40 AM
–

Well that's just your assumption. What if he is autistic and getting rejected even just once is so unbelievably painful for him he never wants to do it again. And it also rarely seems like one thing that caused a man to spend his time rotting online. But rather a bunch of small failures that added up overtime.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:38 AM
–

It's kind of a what came first the chicken or the egg when it comes to this. Do these young men not socialize because they're online too much. Or did they try to socialize. It back fired and now they're online because of said failure to socialize.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:36 AM
4

You're absolutely right about this. But it's also a relatively new dynamic for Men and Women. As for most of human history women absolutely needed Men. And it's only because of modern society and the safety it provides. It pretty much does all the jobs Men used to do when the world was less civilized. But we are also seeing now younger Gen Z Men checking out of society in droves. What this has for the broader future I don't know. But we sure saw waves of young men come out to protest Roe V Wade …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 09:34 PM
-2

Whatever. We already saw this happen with Roe V Wade and abortion rights. Won't be long before they get feminism too. Keep ignoring the reality. It still won't change the outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:05 PM
3

Most people, men and women, agree with womens rights even if they dont identify as feminist. Then why was Roe V Wade dismantled and abortions and contraceptives are becoming illegal?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:55 PM
3

Well regardless. Who is gonna be a Muslim. James or Muhammad. And which religion is anti women's right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:50 PM
–

Sounds like a personal problem when straight men don't have the stones to be different and tell those who might "shame" them to piss off. Guess the current things going on with women's rights is a personal problem. They'll get the "stones" as you put it to be different. Being another generic rando for "society " then whining its not working to get what one thinks they want or can't have? So how's that orthodoxy working for the pill crowd? Okay so keep that same energy for abortion rights and con…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:47 PM
1

Do you know how many Doctors, Lawyers, Engineers are Indian? They hold some of the most prestigious jobs in society. Indians who came to the US are very powerful now. So yes the more people your group has the more power it holds.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:41 PM
2

Was Aztec ideology genetically transmitted? How many Sun God Worshipers do you know. How many human sacrifices have you seen happen in the last few days to keep the sun from going out? These were Ideologies too and now they're extinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:39 PM
-1

I'm not trying to change anyone's mind. I am just stating the facts. If your Ideology doesn't have kids. The ideology dies out. Pretty simple stuff. But so many people here think that just because they like these things it won't go away. I am sure the Aztecs felt the same way about their ideologies. But how many Sun God worshipers do you know? This could easily happen to Feminism if they don't change.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:37 PM
4

Yeah the majority that you know. When Feminists in mass are saying they aren't having children that's the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:32 PM
-2

Maybe start having kids so your ideology doesn't die out. Have fun trying to preach Feminism when the majority of the population will be traditional and religious because you guys don't want to have kids. And last time I checked those traditional and religious people aren't exactly feminist allies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:25 PM
–

No they don't, society forces them into traditional gender roles. Women are given the freedom to pick and choose what roles they get to follow. But for some reason straight men have to be the majority breadwinner. The one who works and the one who provides safety to the household. How many "House Husbands" do you personally know? It's because society shames straight men who don't follow those traditional gender roles but not straight women. They can do whatever they want apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:22 PM
1

Yeah your parents changed political affiliations. That doesn't mean it's the norm which it isn't. The group who has the most kids is the group who will have the most power.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:18 PM
5

Gotta start making the first move then. Didn't you hear? Gender is a spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:17 PM
0

Yeah David Smith is the most common Adult name. Muhammad is still the most common baby name. Meaning the next generation of people born in the UK will be majority Muslim.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:15 PM
2

Do you have a boyfriend who made the first move?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:12 PM
–

That wasn't what you said. You said straight men hold themselves to Traditional Gender roles. Which they don't. We have seen on multiple subreddits men ask why women don't approach men. Women hold straight men to traditional gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:08 PM
1

What does that have to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:05 PM
2

But it's still down from what it was. Birthrates are declining globally. But why isn't it seeing such a steep decline like we do with other non religious and traditional places? It's almost like when you live in a place that values having children. Those places have more children. Shocking concept I know. But it's still down from what it was. Birthrates are declining globally. You got me. A couple of people on YouTube and Tiktok are definitely going to dismantle Sharia Law.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 04:04 PM
1

I answered your question. You're the one accusing me of saying Feminism is the enemy when I never stated that once in any of my responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:59 PM
1

Yes. Or else we would still be sacrificing people to the Sun Gods like the Aztecs did.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:58 PM
–

Bro if you asked any straight man if he wanted women to approach first. It would be a resounding yes everytime.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:57 PM
1

There is a growing and thriving "Ex-Muslim Movement" taking place right now. Source? Just trust me bro! And clearly not enough because last time I checked women in Muslim countries still have the same rights as a Ham Sandwich. Birth rates are down across all demographics, world wide. Yet Africa which is a very traditional and religious continent has the highest birthrate out of every one else.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:53 PM
–

Gotta love how progressive everything is until it has to do with Straight Men. Women can be Men and vice versa. But for some reason straight men are still held to traditional gender roles. How strange if gender is a spectrum yet the majority of women still refuse to make the first move. Not very progressive of you ladies. 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:48 PM
1

Cool. Lemme know all the Vikings you know that pull up to their office job in a LongBoat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:39 PM
0

Once again you are and everyone else are looking for sources that are within a few years to decades. Like I said before this will take hundreds of years to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:38 PM
2

So tell me who do you think is more likely to be Islamic Mohammad or James? Like why is everyone just playing dumb to this? And once again Islamic religion is very anti women. So if you have a society that is majority Islamic. Guess what? That society will become anti women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:37 PM
1

If people who believe in Feminism don't have kids to teach them to believe in Feminism as well they will absolutely die out. And yes Feminism isn't an Empire but it is a major ideology that's existence is relatively small compared to the time span of human existence and compared to other ideologies. Like Roman and Greek Ideologies. And yes Rome and Greece did have some work in creating modern feminism. But modern feminism wasn't even close to what Roman and Greek feminism started as. And if Femi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:33 PM
6

Because if more native born people from the UK had more kids we wouldn't see such a rise in people with the name Mohammad. I think the most common name for boys in the UK in the 1940s was James. Now it's Muhammad. Pretty crazy change that only happened in what 85 years? And all because less people from the UK stopped having kids. And this could absolutely happen to Feminism since they don't want kids either.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:25 PM
1

I mean slavery is still going on. Even now in modern times. Just because most countries don't practice it doesn't mean it has been completely eradicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:21 PM
0

Exactly and if Feminists don't have kids. Less and less people will grow up following those ideologies. Because that ideology died with the last generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:17 PM
1

Where did I say feminism was my enemy? I literally just pointed out that Feminist don't want kids. So if they don't have kids we will see less and less Feminists. Pretty simple logic here. But this might be too big brained for some commentors here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:15 PM
1

That's literally just your opinion but okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:11 PM
1

You act like that can't change. When AI is the norm. Most women will be out of work unless they are nurses. Because most of their jobs like a Teacher, Secretary or HR person will be done way more effectively and cheaper by AI. Even this Dual Income way of living you speak of will be a thing of the past when AI becomes the standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:10 PM
1

Yeah Conservative and Religious Women's form of feminism is completely different than Western Feminism. They believe the man is the center of the household and women shouldn't work and have lots of kids. Pretty much the exact opposite of what Reddit would consider feminism. So if you guys like a feminism that promotes Men being on top and being a baby maker for them then you should have no problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:07 PM
1

Yeah but are these groups Empires anymore? Exactly. Like for a large part of human history it was accepted that we had multiple Gods. Now monotheism is the norm. You act like this can't happen to Feminism. And when you throw in the fact they don't want kids it is definitely gonna happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:03 PM
2

Yeah so is Feminism in the grand scheme of things. I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:01 PM
1

But why is it traditional religious groups have way more kids than modern western groups? How are the modern western groups gonna keep their values alive if they are essentially out birthed by more traditional religious groups. Last time I checked the one with the most people has the most power. That's why Churches had such a strangle hold on society for centuries. Because they had the most people in there group.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:56 PM
-1

That's because there isn't enough people of Islamic faith in the west. If they start having more children then Americans we could absolutely see a change in the political landscape. You don't think these kids raised on traditional Islamic values aren't going to try and get jobs in politics? Or become world leaders? If there is enough of them they absolutely can change everything. Including Feminism. Since the Islamic religion is anti feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:48 PM
1

No one is complaining. It's just a good example of how an entire country's population can change because one group doesn't want kids and the other group wants to have many kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:45 PM
0

Lmao the only reason we don't see varied American baby names is because they aren't being invaded by a mass migration of Muslims.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:44 PM
1

Yeah and Feminism can evolve to be a completely different thing centuries from now. If it's core values aren't upheld. Hell Feminism could become anti women if the right majority get into power.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:39 PM
2

What. Should I not think about the future? Plenty of ancient philosophers predicted things that are happening right now. Imagine if we just told them to not think that far out? That's how innovation and creation spawns by thinking far ahead. We wouldn't be here as a species if we didn't think far out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:33 PM
-1

I could say the same thing about the Romans, the Greeks, The Vikings. At the end of the day if your group doesn't have kids it will die out. It's that simple really.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:31 PM
1

That's cool. And Feminism will also be gone as well. Since they don't want to procreate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:28 PM
–

Lmao you really think that Islam isn't going to bring their anti women traditional values to Europe? Oh you sweet summer child.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:24 PM
1

So you don't think Feminism can be wiped out by those same factors you just listed? If Conservatives have more kids then Democrats they will surely be able to weather any type of mass colonization, new technological advantage or disease of numbers alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:22 PM
-1

Yeah well considering Islam is the main religion in Europe. And they have like 5+ kids per family. And that religion is anti women. Good luck trying to preach Feminism when it's 5 Muslims with traditional values to every 1 Feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:19 PM
1

Yeah that's literally what they are doing right now with immigrants from other countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:17 PM
-1

Okay then why is the most common name in the UK Muhammad? Last time I checked the UK was predominantly White like a 100 years ago. Islam is the main religion in Europe. Why isn't Feminism the main ideology in Europe? Oh wait because Feminists aren't having any kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:15 PM
0

Lmao no it doesn't. And yeah give the Amish a couple or more years even centuries and you will see what happens. Like you guys are so concerned with how this will play out tomorrow when this is something that will take a very very long time to happen. But it will happen. Like I said how many Aztecs do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:13 PM
4

Yeah except what you're forgetting is the people who are Democrats are child free and the ones who are Republicans are having as many kids as they can. Like I said this isn't something that will happen in 2 years. We are talking 200 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:11 PM
-2

Bro are you okay? Like I am not even being a dick. Like how is this so hard to understand? I already said ideologies aren't genetic. But you keep passing over the party where I said if one ideology preaches have as many kids as possible and another says don't. Which ideology is going to be the dominant one in the future?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:07 PM
0

I'm legit gonna get a brain aneurysm from you guys. Ideology, Religions and Movement are not hereditary or genetic. But if your Ideology says don't have kids. How are they going to pass on their teachings if there are no kids to pass these teachings on too?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:06 PM
1

Why would they die out? BECAUSE THEY'RE AREN'T HAVING ANY KIDS TO PASS DOWN THEIR IDEOLOGY TOO!!! Lmao this post is way too dumb for you to be acting petty over it. Keep denying reality. This is what the Romans did before they fell and the Greeks and so on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:04 PM
1

Lmao what are you even talking about? No ideology, religion or movement is genetic. But when said ideology preaches don't have kids while another says have as many kids as possible. The one who has the most kids will be the dominant force in society by shear numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:01 PM
-6

No but if those people with those political views don't have kids. The amount of people with said political views will get smaller and smaller until there isn't any of them left. Like I said how many Aztecs do you know who are around today? There was probably tens of millions of them at one point. Now that religion is extinct. And this is no different than Democrats. We have tens of millions of them right now. But if more and more stop having kids they will be gone too like the Aztecs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 02:00 PM
-1

Bro if you're Ideology preaches don't have kids. Well it's pretty simple what's gonna happen to that ideology when all the childless people die out. Like this isn't a hard concept to understand is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:56 PM
-7

Bro do you understand that with every generation. Democrats are having less and less kids? Like I said I don't think the Feminist Movement will die out tomorrow but in 100, 200 or even 300 years it absolutely will be gone if this trend continues.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:55 PM
3

I mean clearly that isn't happening considering now the most common name in the UK is Mohammed. And if you think Conservatives and Inkwells are bad. Well middle eastern religion would make it so women couldn't even go outside without a man present with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:53 PM
-8

Yeah but if that perspective ends with them not having kids. Well there goes that perspective. Like Conservative families end up with Democrat kids all the time. But when those Democrats grow up they don't have any kids of their own to pass on their knowledge then that ideology dies with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:50 PM
–

Why does every man who women have this "instant" chemistry with almost always 6ft+, Muscular and make lots of money? Have you ever seen women have an instant connection with Paul the Petco Gerbil Cage Cleaner?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:17 PM
2

I mean it's better than no likes or matches. And while that is true that doesn't mean every like and match is from them auto swiping. Plus that is a way more manageable problem than getting no likes or matches at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 11:19 AM
1

Do you get likes and matches?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 11:07 AM
3

When you make a dating profile and get one like a month you'll understand men's willingness to put up with almost anything a woman does. So it's not out of lack of accountability but desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 11:02 AM
-5

Go make a dating profile and write in the bio you want to hold a man's hand. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:59 AM
1

You know exactly what I mean. It’s not just the alcohol it’s the going out to the bars/clubs and being comfortable being plastered in public. You seem to just hate all women. Perhaps that hatred is what makes men unable to date. I got the bingo card guys! Clearly because I point out the hypocrisies of dating. And how women perpetuate them I must hate ALL women. Again you’re chasing the “bad” women not the “good” women. And yes being single is the same for “good” men and women. Good women aren’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:57 AM
0

I think a Global Super Power having a Conservative President will change how everything on this planet runs more than who is in charge of your country.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:44 AM
1

You act like American policies aren't going to trickle down to other countries. Which they totally are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:40 AM
0

Rather be coochieless then have less rights than a dish towel. Brutal
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:38 AM
1

Last time I checked the President Of The United States wasn't trying to take away my rights. So I think I am good homie.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:34 AM
-1

The type of women that go out drinking are the slutty desperate ones and thus act crazy because they are crazy regardless of wither they are sober or not. Oh are they now? I didn't realize the second alcohol touches a woman's lips she turned into a batshit crazy whore. You must not have a lot of faith in your gender if you think every woman who goes out to grab a drink is a desperate slut. I guess you never heard the saying "drunk mouths speak sober thoughts?" Which is my point. Women would neve…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:30 AM
–

Did you at least get laid for dropping $250 on this girl? And thanks I am a proud Transfat. ☺️
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:22 AM
-7

Lmao sorry you can't get a 6' 7" male model and have to settle for the thousands of other options online dating provides you. Why don't you think about the unattractive man who hasn't held a woman's hand in 30 years and has a Mossberg resting against his chin.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:21 AM
1

Damn looks like we found the only person who actually read my post. This should be the top comment. Absolutely Based.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:19 AM
–

And that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:13 AM
0

Very attractive women can also behave badly and men will still date them, even marry them in some cases. Very attractive people have advantages that the rest of us don't. This is not news. I've seen way more fat, unattractive and disrespectful women have absolutely no problem finding men. Yes they aren't going to look like Chris Pratt. But you'll definitely not seeing a fat, unattractive and disrespectful man have the same results. Most people are not attractive enough that they can behave badly…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:12 AM
–

How did that $250 dollar date turn out then?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:08 AM
-2

You mean men like you see slutty women, women with no boundaries/desperate women and bots doing that online and maybe in person. Lmao it's not "slutty women" it's all women. Women will gladly break their rules if the right Man comes along. It's just women will only admit this if they're drunk enough. That's why you only see women acknowledging this in street interviews when they've just come out of the bar and are drunk. They would say the same thing you're saying if they got interviewed sober. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:04 AM
–

Chad probably got her a cupcake he took a bite out of that didn't even have a candle in it to blow out and still got laid. This is my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 10:00 AM
–

Exactly. So instead of paying. Just look for the discounts. And if you get attractive enough. Suddenly that Arby's Dinner Date is the best date she has ever been on. Women who make men wine and dine them are men who women know have zero options. You'll never see a woman tell Chris Hemsworth to wine and dine her. Because he already did with his genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 09:16 AM
7

Yeah dating in general can RedPill/BlackPill a man way more than some videos on YouTube or Reddit posts. Like what people don't understand about BP or RP. Both these ideologies are just responses to observable realities. Like "Woman gets half a man's money when divorcing even though she is the one who cheated." That's a RedPill. Or "Women have way more options when it comes to dating than men." That's a BlackPill. Like these things already existed before hand. Men have just put a label on them n…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 05:34 AM
8

You can have niche appeal to women. The only problem being that dating for men is a numbers game and specifically catering your look hoping to attract that one girl who likes it isn't optimal for dating success. It's why women wonder why men gravitate towards people like Andrew Tate instead of just being themselves. When clearly if just being yourself worked. They would have the same amount of options as Andrew does. Which they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:43 AM
–

I mean make an online dating profile with a Male Model looking for a quick fuck and see how delusional I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 05:12 AM
–

There's no such thing as a 5' 6" Chad. Height is a massive deal breaker for women in dating. And while having a handsome face can help a lot. He will never be a true Chad at just 5' 6".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 04:37 AM
–

I think you would lament the existence of a Billionaire if you were dirt poor. Which is essentially what dating for men is like. Women are the billionaires of dating and men are the dirt poor peasants of dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 04:34 AM
–

Women can definetly use men for a variety of things including sex, I've known some women who kept a roaster of men and then got married to one of them. But what Man doesn't want sex? And if the man doesn't want sex but is getting it anyway. That's not "using" a man that's rape. I mean there's some women into really freaky stuff so I don't know you might get lucky if you look hard enough. Yeah freaky women are rare. I'm not gonna walk around with a bag on my head hoping I trigger some chicks bag …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 04:02 AM
–

I mean we are constantly hearing about how Gen Z aren't going to college aren't leaving the family home and aren't working. It's pretty common knowledge by now that Gen Z women are out performing Gen Z Men in every way and that's because most Gen Z Men are single and have no reason to try.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:56 AM
–

I have no idea what a "sub 5 mens existence" is. I mean of course you don't because they're invisible to you. I am curious why you think people notice every single person every single day they step outside their house. You know I am talking about in a dating/sex sense. Not just acknowledging every person outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:52 AM
–

And your mad cause your not getting used by women for sex? No one is getting "used" for sex. If you mean women make these covert contracts with Chad by sleeping with him and then get mad that he doesn't date them afterwards then yeah. Well just put a bag over your head or something, some women can still have sex with you but if your butt ugly the bag will be necessary. Absolutely no women is fucking a man with a bag over his head in all seriousness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:49 AM
–

Do people going around noticing every single human when they go outside? That sounds exhausting to notice every man/woman/person. You're right it must be so exhausting having to acknowledge sub 5 mens existence. I'm so sorry for your struggle. You're so strong and so brave.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:45 AM
–

The difference is someone is still going to fuck Gorlock. No one is fucking Tyler.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:39 AM
–

You have no idea if these average men were dating these women. Their pictures could have been on the Tea App for any number of reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:39 AM
–

I think a lot of these guys are just NEETmaxxing and live off the bare minimum of government assistance. I mean either way it's never a good sign when the majority of young men have no interest in work or participating in society. Considering they're the future who will inherit this world.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:34 AM
–

I have an answer for you. I can't get both because the dating market is so fucked Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:32 AM
–

The point is that it doesn't matter how many women like or dislike casual sex. When the casual sex does happen it's not gonna be with Tyler the Discord Mod.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:25 AM
–

I mean men can feel whatever emotion they want about this. I think a lot of women just expected them to keep participating in society and voting for things that didn't benefit them. But obviously that isn't the case since Gen Z Men have seemed to have dropped out of the work force and have completely shifted politically to the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:24 AM
–

"Chad" is often an average dude. Of course you think Chad's an "Average dude" Lmao. Just goes to show how bad hypergamy and the inflation of the dating market has gotten. What's "average" is going to depend on multiple factors such as socioeconomic, age, locations, etc. Actually Chad is pretty universal among all backgrounds. Because women all find the same type of men attractive. I've only ever dated what this sub would call "Chad," but to me/everyone else, they were just regular schmegular dud…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:17 AM
–

You're the one who called them landwhales. I just answered your question on whether I would fuck them or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:04 AM
–

I wonder what "decent" means in this day and age with unchecked hypergamy. Dude probably has a 9inch pool noodle and looks like Channing Tatum.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 03:02 AM
–

I think it's because most women nowadays consider a 6'2" muscular man average. And anyone below that literally doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:59 AM
–

You act like I could fuck a landwhale with how inflated the dating market is today.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:57 AM
–

Statistically most women have at least one or two hookups in their lives, but they don’t have a lot of casual with different men, it’s usually with the same few men. Yes I do agree that women do probably have one or two hookups in their lives. It's just always with Chad. So from Chad's perspective women love casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:29 AM
–

Yes and average men are getting NO casual sex..... NONE
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:26 AM
–

He just so happens to be 6' 6" with Blue Eyes teehee 🤭
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:25 AM
–

You're right about both Chad's and women who want casual sex being rare. But casual sex for Chad isn't rare. Casual sex is just rare for average men which is my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:24 AM
20

I do believe women are sharing all the top men. And the term for this is called "Soft Harem" meaning that lots of women are in relationships and fucking the same man but they just don't realize it. Chad knows of course. Which is why it's called a "Soft" Harem. As these women have no idea it's going on. And apps like "Tea" and Facebook Groups like "Are We Dating The Same Man" prove this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:08 AM
7

I don't think women were getting on the Tea App to see if Raj the Petco Cage Cleaner was a fuckboy. And it's funny because if you look at the screenshot of all the top men they all just so happen to be White and Muscular.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 03:24 PM
–

Sigh once again we are being blamed for Chad's actions. 😞
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 03:11 PM
6

Yeah I think it's more of a tongue and cheek sort of thing with women. Like someone else said they aren't going to fork over their entire bank account like men do. Granted you wouldn't want to see your girl writing comments like that on other men's social media pages. But RedPill men in general have been telling these guys for years that women have a dual mating strategy and will assign men various roles depending on how attractive they are. So if you're the dude finding your wife or girlfriend …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 05:40 PM
20

No one is turning back any clocks. It's just GenZ Men aren't running to the voting booths to vote for things that frankly don't affect them. It's almost like when you make approaching women in public practically illegal. Only date the same type of men. And keep calling GenZ Men losers and stay at home momma's boy they aren't lining up around the block come elections in November for someone who doesn't benefit them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 05:33 PM
3

Of course. Not arguing against that. But men finding more women attractive means women are more replaceable. Women don't find most men attractive so harder to replace. No it's not because like I just said. It doesn't matter that men will fuck anything. It doesn't change their dating options whatsoever. Look at the ForeverAlone subreddit. You don't think those guys haven't come to that conclusion as well? Hell the ForeverAloneWomen sub. Which is essentially the female version of the ForeverAlone …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 11:25 AM
5

Bro what?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:55 AM
3

meaning what? that a woman is gonna have a flood of likes / matches? that's exactly OPs point. women are easy to replace as most men just want sex so "any woman will do" mentality is exactly why they swipe right too much and women have too many likes. Just because men will literally fuck anything doesn't mean it suddenly gives them the ability to fuck anything. It's actually been hurting the dating market because now even fat single moms think they deserve a 6' 3" Lawyer because Chad was having …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:54 AM
7

0/10 ragebait.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:41 AM
22

Make a female dating profile and see how wrong this post is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:38 AM
40

She would be better off saying "certain" men can't make their lives revolve around women. I know plenty of Chad's that constantly revolve their lives around women and it isn't a problem because they actually get them. This is just another get back on the Hamster Wheel post and keep the lights on loser! When in reality most men nowadays are done participating in a society that doesn't reward them. Like Reddit and PPD keeps denying it but there's a reason we saw one of the biggest political shifts…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 10:10 AM
5

Lol. No, they won't. A janitor job doesn't require education, certifications, or 14+ hour days. You act like you need a full blown Nursing degree to empathize with someone's situation. They work in the same building and a Janitor can understand a Nurses struggles. But like I said you'll never see a Nurse dating a Janitor. I wouldn't even know where I'd meet a janitor. Lmao this is how I know you're playing stupid on purpose. Just wait by the bathroom of any building. They'll eventually come arou…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 09:02 PM
5

If she's a working nurse, it has little to do with money. Plus, not all doctors make hundreds of thousands of dollars. Most Doctors do make lots of money. So yes it is. You're just playing stupid. And acting like Nurses aren't attracted to Doctors because they hold significant power in society and make tons of money and literally save lives. But instead they get together because they bond over the job. Like I said Overnight Janitors can understand just as well the working life of a Nurse. It's j…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:36 PM
7

The relationships are frequent because they understand the work and commitment that comes with it. Yep. Has nothing to do with the hundreds of thousands of dollars he makes. I'm sure you're in a relationship with someone who holds more power than you do yourself. I don't think a doctor could get a nurse kicked out for no reason. If a nurse is fired, it's not because some doctor said, "I don't like her." I mean they can just make something up and the Doctor will be believed because he is a Doctor…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:22 PM
9

They don’t care about the power imbalance relative to their man, they care about power imbalance relative to other men. So they care about power imbalances. Like I said you're just over complicating what I am saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:17 PM
7

Doctors aren't the boss of nurses. Nurses have their own bosses separate from doctors. Doctors don't have control if a nurse stays employed or not. The nurse administration determines it. You don't think a Doctor could get a Nurse kicked out a Hospital? A Doctor has way more power than a Nurse. Which is why relationships between them is so frequent and not the Overnight Janitor.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:12 PM
13

So men want women who make significantly more money than them and are taller and stronger? This is news to me
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:05 PM
6

What power does a doctor have over a nurse? What power does a principal have over a school teacher? Well for one if they are working in the same building he is literally their boss. So he could control if they stay employed there or not. But yet we see these relationships play out all the time. We never see the Nurse dating the Overnight Janitor Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:04 PM
13

What do all these men have in common? Power
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:01 PM
1

Okay so then don't complain about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 07:57 PM
16

No. There's a cultural model in which women date more powerful men. (In part because men are so precious about their vision of masculinity, that a lot of men are freaked out about having more powerful wives.) First off. How many House Husbands do you know? I literally don't know any. Women want powerful men way more than this idea that men are afraid of having powerful wives. If anything "powerful" wives tend to leave their less powerful husbands because they feel like the Man now in the relatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 07:55 PM
19

That was just a longer way of saying women like power imbalances.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 07:49 PM
0

So why even comment? This is supposed to be a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 05:04 AM
4

And just because they don't want to doesn't mean they can't. That's what I am saying. You will always have the option to easily replace a man after a relationship ends. Just because you don't want to do that doesn't mean that the option to do so doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:36 AM
2

Okay. So since you believe that it's not about the gender that makes someone able to move faster. But rather the one who initiates the breakup. If we took a man who broke up with his girlfriend and has already checked out and then took his ex and both put them on a dating app. You're saying because the man broke up first he should be able to find a new relationship and move on faster?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:32 AM
1

You didn't answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:26 AM
6

I just don't think it's the norm. Or more men would be inuating breakups way more than women do if it was that easy. Most men stay in relationships even when they are bad because that's the only consistent sex they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:26 AM
3

Not automatically, but he's likely to start dating sooner. But you were essentially saying that whoever decides to move on faster is the one who can get into a relationship faster. So like I said by that logic the man who leaves faster should run circles around the woman who was caught off guard if we put them both on a dating app. But you know that isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:22 AM
6

When I did finally feel like I was ready to move on, it was relatively easy to find someone to scratch that itch. So while I don't disagree that it is easier for women to find a new fling/relationship post break-up, I do think that there are a lot of women who build up break-up energy for a very long time and then cut the cord, ready to move on immediately. You proved my point by saying this though. Just because YOU weren't ready for a new relationship doesn't mean the options you had to move on…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:20 AM
8

You're definitely an outlier and this isn't the common experience for most men after a breakup.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:14 AM
4

But my point is that you can emotionally check out all you want. If you don't have any options after you emotionally check out, it doesn't matter. I can emotionally check out too. It won't change the fact that I will never even get even close to the amount of likes and messages on a dating app.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:13 AM
2

I mean for every one of those men on Reddit. There are thousands of other ugly men ready to paint their ceilings with brain matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:02 AM
5

Lmao the stories about men who try to "open up" their relationships only for it to backfire on them and the woman gets flooded with male attention and the man gets nothing. Funny how when you put it in that context suddenly every woman admits how easily replaceable men are. 🤔🤔🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 04:01 AM
-1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:55 AM
2

Yeah that's super easy for women to get. Happens all the time. This myth that women are the gatekeepers of sex and Men are the gatekeepers of relationships is just pure cope. Women can have both or either anytime they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:53 AM
0

So then if we did my experiment the man should be able to get into a relationship quicker than a woman could because he "moved on faster"? I'm just saying that you're just saying things without looking at the objective reality. Doesn't matter if the woman was caught completely off guard and the man knew ahead of time. She would still find a relationship way faster than he would.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:51 AM
1

Women can get “accepted” for sex by men better than them in every way that they have nothing in common with. This is one reason they can get over a relationship quicker. I think this is just a cope to help MGTOWs sleep at night. Women are just as easily able to get both sex and relationships whenever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:48 AM
3

However, I'd posit that it would be more appropriate to claim that women are able to regain their emotional agency, self-confidence, overall happiness quicker than men, due to having more social outlets that permit deeply meaningful conversation. As a result, it would be much easier for women (again, generally speaking) to 'bounce back', so to speak after a rough breakup, thus allowing her to replenish herself within the dating market once again. I mean if I signed up for a dating app after a ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:46 AM
7

Most men would be happy if they could just get that after a breakup. Instead of going back to the Online Dating Plantation and spending another couple months swiping for hours on end getting no likes and no matches.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:43 AM
3

While I agree that men with past success wouldn't have as hard of a time getting into a relationship again then a guy who got his first girlfriend at 30 years old. I still think a regular woman would be able to run circles around even a handsome successful man when it comes to who gets back into a relationship faster. Men are just too easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:38 AM
1

My argument isn't about why a relationship fails. Just that women moving on faster has nothing to do with them having some sort of higher emotional intelligence. But just that men are easy and in abundance.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:34 AM
22

This isn't a woman thing, this is a "person who ends it thing." I was able to move on relatively quickly from my last relationship because I had been working towards the realization that it was over for over a month prior to us breaking up. So you're saying if we took a man who broke up with his girlfriend and put him on a dating app looking for a new relationship. And then we took a woman in the same scenario and put her on a dating app as well. They would both find a new partner in the same am…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:30 AM
6

I mean just because you didn't feel ready for a relationship doesn't mean you couldn't have scratched said itch pretty much immediately after your relationship ended. You just choose to wait longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:27 AM
–

I think for the most part what OP is saying is that if most men had the ability to get consistent access to women for sex. They wouldn't be in relationships. A lot of men whether they admit or not get into relationships for the access to consistent sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:04 AM
3

Lmao yeah sure let me drop a couple hundred on a chick for dinner so she doesn't have to get stuffed by Chad on an empty stomach. While I am at it let me buy the condoms as well. Don't want Chad to get her pregnant. The reason men aren't spending money on women is because women already showed their hand that they are 100% willing to have sex with men for free if he is hot enough. Pretty much all these "rules" you make men follow aren't actually rules if the right man comes along. So how can you …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 07:17 PM
22

I think a lot of average and ugly men who don't have a lot of experience with women actually think it's a good idea to befriend women first and then try to win them over time. This is why I always suggest to guys on here to get Chad friends so they can see what raw attraction looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 06:21 PM
-4

Men don’t need to solve the cultural issues, but they need to stop pretending their meeting demand or she just they just prefer white blokes . No dude, we all know when you live in a country where women have the same rights as you, you struggle to date (maybe because you don’t want a partner but someone you can control?) so your going abroad where women have less rights and you can exploit one a bit easier. I mean they are meeting a demand. These women who live in countries that have a poor econ…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 02:22 PM
5

And it’s more if a disappointment in men from first world countries, because they know this too, but don’t care. Their happy to exploit that fact, these women go from being controlled by their own men to being controlled from western men. I mean what do you want them to do? Go there and fix the entire socioeconomic structure of said country? Western Men are just meeting the demand these women are asking for. Those women have full agency to walk away at any time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 02:00 PM
–

From your perspective it's a pathetically impoverished sense of validation. For men, women wanting to sleep with them is a sign of success. There's a reason why in Scarface Tony Montana says "First you get the money, then you get the power and then you get the women." Notice how women is last. That's because having lots of women who want to have sex with you is a by-product of being very successful. You don't get women, then money, then power. We don't see lines of women forming outside neck bea…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:07 PM
–

So these men need to own a HKP30L?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:44 PM
–

Lmao what's the "X Factor"? Being Chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:41 PM
–

The problem with an Open Marriage is the same with an Open Relationship. It's an absolute cock carousel for the woman and a barren desert of rejection for the man. This will eventually lead to jealousy on the man's part and the relationship will dissolve. Unless of course the man is a cuck and likes that. Then it won't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:32 PM
2

That is very true. I think the only country close to what he is referring to is probably North Korea. You know Kim Jong Un is swimming in pussy. While I am sure the rest of the men in his country are too busy working in gulags to even think about getting laid themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 12:45 PM
6

But most polygamous societies tend to collapse because eventually the men at the bottom revolt and take out the man at the top with all the money and pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 12:32 PM
–

Women have been exploiting loser men in the west for decades now. There was a woman a couple years ago who used Tinder to get a man to move the furniture out of her apartment for free. There are also "cuddle" sites that exploit lonely desperate men starved of affection. Hell how many hot chicks have you matched with online and had a full blown conversation with thinking you're getting close to her just for her to say. "Talk to me more on my Onlyfans." And you can say it's a supply and demand iss…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:47 AM
–

I mean women have been doing that to loser men in the west for decades now. There was a woman a couple years ago who used Tinder to get a man to move the furniture out of her apartment for free. There are also "cuddle" sites that exploit lonely desperate men starved of affection. Hell how many hot chicks have you matched with online and had a full blown conversation with thinking you're getting close to her just for her to say. "Talk to me more on my Onlyfans." And you can say it's a supply and …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:40 AM
–

Well what's morally wrong about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:02 AM
–

I mean wouldn't this very post we are commenting on be considered pushback? Like if everything is good as you say why would anyone even be talking about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:38 AM
–

Yeah I don't think your average American man is making women insecure or have eating disorders. They're doing this specifically for Chad's. They're not starving themselves for a 5' 2" manlet who works at White Castle. Let's be honest. I think the real pushback is coming from the fact that western women are now losing their backup plans. Western Men are supposed to be using their time not being able to get women by making lots of money and being a nice cushy pillow for them to land on when Chad i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 09:54 AM
5

Yeah the Mods must be asleep or something for this to have gotten through.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 03:03 AM
–

I actually agree with OP. I think "sexual compatibility" is just a big word salad for women to explain away why they feel no attraction for their beta boyfriends/husbands when they do literally everything they tell them to do and are super nice and attentive. Sexual Compatibility for women is very simple. Just have higher value than her. Look and live a life that makes other women show attraction towards you. And don't drown her in attention 24/7. If you can have and keep all three of these you'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 03:12 AM
40

You need to get some Chad friends and go out with them to a bar or club. Its equal parts absolutely eye opening and extremely brutal. You'll see all the things about courtship and being respectful that women constantly rage about on here is a total lie. If she isn't ready to suck your cock behind an ally the minute you guys meet she isn't that into you. Never let a woman punish you for what Chad did to her. If she says "Oh I don't do X on the first date." That's womanese for "I tried to use my p…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 02:54 PM
3

But there is no such thing as easy pussy. You literally just said a nepo baby man gets pussy. You act like men are born into rich families everyday. When women start having sex with Gas Station Employees your argument will make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 02:39 PM
1

The fact that you can't even understand my argument shows that getting sex to you is just so unfathomably easy. I want you to put on your reading glasses and actually read what I wrote. And there clearly isn't a change in difficulty when you go from sleeping with an Average Joes to Celebrities because you literally just said this: Maybe men should stop being so easy then, not my problem. Last time I checked celebrity men are still men or are they their own separate species?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:26 AM
-1

I mean how many guys do you know were born into super rich families? My point still applies. Women don't need to be nepo babies to get laid. But like you said a man would have to be lucky enough to be born into a super wealthy family to be able to even get the same amount of sex a girl born to a poor family can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:18 AM
8

Bro you're not listening. The way for women to be seen as equal is to put in equal amounts of work into getting laid as these celebrity men you talked about. So yes if you spend decades of your life trying to be the top 1% in terms of finance, looks and status then there wouldn't be a stigma because you actually earned it instead of just existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:14 AM
5

Until they put in the same amount of effort men do to get laid whatever power dynamics you're talking about is never going to change. I keep telling you the reason women get stigmatized is because they can show up to a bar after not showering for 3 weeks while wearing skid marked underwear and go home with a man in under 10 minutes. I just don't think you realize how rare it is for a man to have the same options for sex as your average woman does. It's extremely rare. Most men go their entire li…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:09 AM
10

I do think men do think a woman who has a high body count is icky. But I think part of that ick comes from how easy it is for them to get sex. It just shows poor impulse control on their part. While with men you actually have to have accomplished something to even get your foot in the door to get laid. So that's why men aren't shamed the same way. You said it yourself. You wouldn't have sex with just any average man. So clearly getting lots of sex as a man is an effect of being very successful i…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 04:59 AM
9

But the reason men see women who engage in casual sex as devaluing is because it's so incredibly easy for them to get sex. An 80 year old obese Grandma could get laid in 5 minutes if she wanted to. And OP already proved it by saying she would only have sex with celebrities. That's why men don't get shamed for having casual sex because it's a by-product of being successful. You don't see women lining up to fuck the highschool drop out who plays videogames in his mom's basement all day. Women are …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 04:40 AM
1

Chad's are 100% real. You may not call them Chad's. But when you ladies see one you sure act and treat him differently than you would an average and ugly man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 10:06 AM
0

I mean my point still applies. A middle ground man isn't suddenly going to run circles around Chad when it comes to getting women just because he's a Pro Feminist and Chad isn't. And that's my point. Men will actually date below their looks level if a woman actually displays traits of being a traditional woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 10:03 AM
3

Yes the dating market is "thriving" for women. For most Men it's a baron desert. And the "certain type" of men you are referring to are Chad's. Who have always done well in the dating market. But the issue is there are more average men than Chad's. So if you have mass groups of men who haven't been on a date or in a relationship in literal decades. You're gonna be hard pressed to see them at your local women's march protesting for things that frankly do not concern them. And I only used that exa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 07:51 PM
3

I think the difference is that a man would actually pick a male centered woman over a stuck up bitch even if she is hotter. Just because she would make his life easier. While as a guy it doesn't matter how female centric and nice you are to women it rarely increases your chances with them if you're not good looking enough. Like if you took a 5' 2" manlet who is a pro feminist and a 6' 5" misogynist Chad. And had them try and get numbers at a bar. The Chad would win every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 07:09 PM
3

What is Trump doing to butt fuck Gen Z Men? Last time I checked Trump is taking away women's rights not men's.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 04:30 PM
39

More proof that men want to be put in the fuck zone. This is why when women say "I just used him for sex. But I wanted a relationship with you!!" Isn't the flex they think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 01:46 PM
10

Yes this isn't a surprise that the dating market for Men is so bad that even 40 year old morbidly obese single moms with 9 kids have more options than a Fit 40 year old man who is a Doctor. It also shouldn't be a surprise then that because of this many men are leaving the dating market and women behind completely. And also for once looking out for themselves and their own interests. Thus why Donald Trump is in office. Gone are the days of men being the sacrificial lamb for ungrateful women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 12:39 PM
0

Nobody argues that Chad is attractive, but there is an argument that being a Chad will just get you through the door, it will not guarantee you stay. There are no guarantees in life. And it's better to be able to get through the door then having every door you try to open be locked. Which is the case for most average and ugly men. Women think that ultimate goal is relationship, while men think that ultimate goal is access to sex with as many women as possible. Two different goals This is just th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 11:54 AM
-1

No it's not dirty talk. See you guys always want to have your cake and eat it too. Woman: "Oh this man called me a cunt on the train yesterday!!" 6'5" Uber Chad: "Take my cock you worthless bitch!!" Woman: "Yes Daddy 🥴🥴🥴" All this shows is it's actually okay to insult and degrade women if you're hot enough. Which completely undermines the seriousness of it. There should be no scenario where it is okay to insult women if it's such a serious offense.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:29 AM
-1

Okay so if a woman consents to being lit on fire does that make it okay? Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:20 AM
2

Yes that's actually the whole point. If degrading and insulting women was actually as serious as women make it out to be. There wouldn't be any scenario where it is okay. But of course you can insult and degrade women. Just make sure you're a 6' 5" Chad of course Teehee!!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:16 AM
-2

I don't know why posts like this try so hard to reinvent the wheel. We already know what women like, it's Chad. Like you're trying to paint women out to be these extremely complicated and hard to understand creatures. When all you have to do is make a dating profile. Have one profile of a 6' 4" White Finance Bro and a 5' 2" Indian Janitor and see who does better. But what's funny is anyone reading this probably knows without even doing the experiment who is going to do better. I think your issue…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 09:53 AM
0

There is no way this comment is at the top. I swear Reddit is filled with fucking bots upvoting this stupid shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 06:39 PM
11

Lmao tell where in my comment I said any of those things. This is exactly what I am talking about. All I said is men should be free to vote for what benefits them and here you are saying all this crazy shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 04:55 PM
8

I find it funny when women say they're going to do things that benefit them it's empowering and brave. And when I say men are going to do things that benefit them it's a threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 04:43 PM
2

I think Incels think having a bunch of kids that will put you in financial ruin is an even playing field.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:15 PM
8

You're right but after having a couple accidental children you can't afford because abortion is banned will probably make you think differently about having casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:47 PM
7

Well considering studies have shown 60% of men age 18-29 have reported being single I would say maybe this applies for Millennial Men but not for Gen Z Men. And sorry but the last time I checked a man having a lot of friends isn't going to improve his chances on online dating which is the number one way people meet now a days.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:41 PM
9

They're not trying to make women like them. They're just gonna try and ruin sex for everybody by making it too risky and too expensive to have. And with the Big Beautiful Bill being passed and one of the things in said bill is making it so abortions now have to be paid out of pocket I would say it is working.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:36 PM
17

Exactly. Women's catch phrase on here is we don't owe anyone anything. So if that's the case. Men don't owe women their vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:30 PM
0

Yes cause that's cheating lmao. Who wouldn't lose their collective mind if their significant other did that? If it was a random man, I wouldn't think they'd care at all. My point isn't from the fact that it's cheating but from the fact that if dating apps worked the same way they did for men that they do for women they would be outlawed tomorrow. Women can barely handle men watching porn. Which is just some pixels on a screen. Imagine if they could have thousands of eager women wanting to date t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:26 PM
9

You've never heard of women getting flown out for the weekend by men they meet on Instagram?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:13 PM
0

I gave you two real sources. And I never said having women as second hand citizens in my comment. Just men who hoard all the women for themselves cause an unstable society.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:11 PM
10

Lmao they don't compete for Becky. She competes for them. They just fly her out for the weekend and after she gets a taste of what being with that caliber of man is like she'll never look at the boy across the street the same way again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:10 PM
12

I wouldn't say most women are trying to go out with NFL stars they meet online. That's just an extreme example. But I will say the amount of options women now have because of the Internet and technology in general makes it so the average man who would have had no problem getting a wife only a couple of decades ago is now a card carrying Incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:08 PM
1

Case of the Aztecs: Aztec polygamy, particularly among the nobility, led to succession wars and a large number of unproductive nobles, which eventually contributed to the empire's downfall. South Sudan: Polygamy is highlighted as a contributing factor to the ongoing civil war in South Sudan, where a high percentage of women are in plural marriages. I can name more if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:06 PM
4

Women have always shared men. In fact when you look at most cultures before we really started enforcing monogamy. Women would naturally drift towards the male with the most power and resources. The only problem with this being it led to an unstable society because the majority of men who got no women eventually got tired being over worked and under fucked and would revolt against the man with all the women thus causing the society to collapse. Which is why we have a more enforced monogamous soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 12:00 PM
–

Your assumption of my username has nothing to do with what I wrote. All I am doing is just pointing out the hypocrisy of women's dating rules that are easily broken when the right man comes along. It's really not that deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:57 AM
15

Oh they don't. Just don't be surprised when Men in mass vote in ways that benefit them and not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:52 AM
4

This is more so what happens when you have a Globalized Dating Economy. When women's only options are you or Brian down the road of course you're gonna have an easier time then if it's you versus an NFL Player she met on Instagram.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:51 AM
17

I mean I would argue when you really think about how ruthless and competitive the dating market is for the average man do you think your father would have even had a chance to conceive you if he existed in this current dating climate? Before Online Dating and social media apps a man's biggest competition was the other man across the street from him. Now he's competing with NFL players and Dubai Millionaires for Becky on the corner house. I also find it funny too because of course women will show…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:45 AM
–

The shaming that women display when they see this sort of language doesn't come from the language itself but rather the men using said language. This is why it's important to watch women's actions instead of listening to their words. A lot of times women will mask their true nature through their words but if you watch long enough and see the right Man come around eventually their body and their nature will betray them. For a lot of average and below average men. They think these rules women make…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:33 AM
2

It's definitely leaps and bounds more difficult when you're a guy who is neurodivergent for sure. I've seen women on here who are agoraphobics who are married lmao. Absolute recruit difficulty.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:31 PM
1

The disability pill is a hard one to swallow. It's really men that tend to not have fulfilling relationships when it comes to being Neurodivergent. ADHD and Autism are an absolute death sentence for a man's love life considering men need to have the ability to discern social ques in order to court women since most women will not make the first move unless the man is extremely attractive. For the most part being a neurodivergent woman is actually a plus in most men's eyes. Because as fucked up as…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:23 PM
5

I've seen too many women say they're this sexual and that sexual. Yet all seem to be attracted to the same man. Honestly if she doesn't want to rip your clothes off after the first time meeting she just isn't that into you. Women always have a man they will break all their "rules" which are really just a way to keep average and ugly men in line. Chad can do whatever he wants of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:56 PM
5

Wonder if you would have this same energy if the post was about women rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 04:07 PM
–

This guy gets it. "I'm Demisexual!! He also just so happens to be a 6' 4" Blue Eyed White Man tee hee. "
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 03:13 PM
1

Bro you didn't even read what I wrote man..... 🤣😭
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 09:09 AM
-5

Women's biggest challenge to getting a boyfriend is putting down the fork. Women don't want to accept this. But just not being fat is enough to attract almost 90% of men. And even with this information they will still say it's too hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 08:54 AM
5

Lmao going to a bar or the mall is teenage behavior. I'm sorry I didn't realize the bars and malls only except 18 year olds. You know the point I am trying to make. You're just being purposely obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 04:08 AM
2

Yeah obviously. I'm saying that there are no laws that make it so male citizens are required to help women who are getting stolen from or physically harmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 03:59 AM
2

There is no law that makes it so your average male citizen has to make sure women are safe or protected. It's a common courtesy given to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 03:44 AM
2

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is not a legally binding treaty itself. Nice try though. 🤭
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 03:31 AM
3

Yeah I got you. Take a 5'4" Indian and 6' 6" White Man to the Mall and tell them to ask for girls numbers and see who does better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 03:19 AM
-3

Okay take the 5' 4' Indian and 6 '6" White Man to a real life bar and tell them to ask for girls numbers and see which one does better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:11 AM
–

Because the PPD Mods and Reddit at large are hard at work trying to make it look like the Black Pill isn't completely mainstream. As if we haven't seen phrases like "LooksMaxxing and Mogged" all over social media platforms besides Reddit. I guarantee you if they didn't have to constantly censor every single post 24/7 365. Reddit would look no different than 4Chan or Incels.Co, but they want Incels to look like a small neech group when it's actually the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:09 AM
8

Okay go take a 5' 4" Indian man and a 6' 6" White Man to a bar and go ask them to chat up women and get their numbers. The Indian will get kicked out of the bar after his first approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 02:00 AM
0

Lol yes. Go make a dating profile of a 5'4" Indian and a 6' 6" White Man and see who does better. I'll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 01:43 AM
4

Meanwhile for Men Be White 6ft + 6Inches + Not Bald/Receding Not Poor Has Friends Had Previous Girlfriends Isn't A Virgin Be Muscular Be Smart Own A Home In Your Late 20s/Early 30s Make over 100k Don't Be Needy Don't Be Emotional Don't Be Aggressive Don't Be A Pussy Have A Prestigious Job Also Be Able To Have Enough Time Off To Go On Multiple Vacations A Year Don't Be Too Busy Don't Have Too Much Free Time
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 12:17 AM
1

You're absolutely right. And no one owes anyone safety or security either.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 12:03 AM
–

Sure know how to pick em.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:33 PM
-6

And that's why he is your ex.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 01:56 PM
-9

Funny how I am just acting like the male version of WizardLiz who literally just viewed men as a piggy bank but when I do it it's a problem okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:53 AM
-11

I mean it clearly wasn't irrelevant or she would have married a Janitor. And wow I am sure he is crying himself to sleep and wiping away his tears with hundred dollar bills while a new hole takes her place. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:48 AM
-6

Lmao yes a 23 year old self made millionaire was beneath her. Keep telling yourself that. And yes he did know who she was. He knew she was a self absorbed gold digger that thought marrying a less attractive millionaire somehow negated the fact that he was a millionaire. Newsflash it doesn't. Like I said a cylindrical metal ring doesn't change that or the optionality he can now enjoy because of that. If you don't like that reality well don't date millionaires then. Because when you look at most m…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:44 AM
-1

Yes this is the main point I think OP missed. Women aren't acting like this with every guy. Just with average and ugly men. Chad will always get play for free. Men who are average and ugly sometimes forget or could be ignorant to the fact that women will put men into boxes depending on the role they decide for them. They have a guy they fuck, a guy they're in a relationship with and a guy that is her friend and pays for everything. You don't want to be the second and third guy gentleman. Remembe…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 05:20 AM
19

Once you see the 6' 6" Chris Hemsworth look a like just exist and get women. You'll realize that being a "decent man" has very little to do with being successful with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 06:52 PM
3

Well you don't see women being a pickme for the local Indian Janitor. This sort of admiration is reserved for very high value men. That's really all I am saying. Men for the most part seem to simp over almost any girl they come in contact with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 01:40 PM
3

Well the term pickme refers to a girl who wants to be picked by a guy she admires. A singular man. And the reason they only go after a singular man is because they have so many options they only choose to be a pickme for the best one. Men are different in that they simp for multiple women because they don't have as many options so they don't focus on one singular woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 01:33 PM
4

I think another thing OP failed to point out is that a man who is a simp is directly tied to how he looks. How many 6'6" Chris Hemsworth look alikes do you see that are stuck in the friendzone with one girl? We like to look at the end result of these sexual dynamics between men and women but not the causes. I would argue women would probably behave in a similar manner to men if they had the same optionality which is practically nothing when it comes to the average man in the dating market. It ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 11:35 AM
–

Yeah he definitely doesn't show me pictures of him having sex because that is a little gay. Just pictures of what these women look like and the text messages. So nice assumption there. I don't know why it's almost impossible for you to grasp that men will talk about the sex they have with women with other men they know. Just how women will literally do the exact same thing. Funny how you're acting like this pearl clutching Nun. But wouldn't bat an eye if a woman said she would tell her friends s…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 01:17 AM
1

I mean for a lot of men. Their lives are already essentially over. So from their perspective they really don't care what happens to the economy. Of course if you have a significant other and kids and other responsibilities to worry about you'll obviously care how this country is run. But if you're a jobless neet that doesn't matter. But this is of course what seems to happen when you have a large population of excess men with nothing to live for and also nothing to lose.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:07 PM
1

You think it's gay for two men to talk about how they are having sex with women? And I mean he could but all the texts and pictures would be extremely hard to fake.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 05:01 PM
2

No I just assumed people would have enough common sense to know when I say freedom to go anywhere you want that they aren't trying to go places that will literally kill you if you go there. That's like if I said people have the freedom to swim anywhere they want and then someone's like "well what if I want to swim in the Nile River that's full of crocodiles!!".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 12:37 AM
2

I mean when I made the post I assumed most people wouldn't want to be traveling to 3rd world countries or ones that are war torn.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 07:13 PM
2

No one is traveling to those shitholes. Man or woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:50 PM
2

You're literally the only person that actually understood what my post was about. For some reason everyone got hung up on the logistics of Van life and how said lifestyle would be afforded when it was just an extreme example to show that a woman could literally be living in a van in the middle of nowhere and have more options than most men. And apparently everyone here knows a 10/10 Chad Van Life Slayer. When if most men are struggling to even get a match on Tinder and they have a full time job …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:23 AM
3

Um excuse me sweaty!!! You're supposed to be a woman's therapist, motivational coach, cheuafer and personal bank account and expect NOTHING in return!!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:01 AM
2

I think for the most part they do know that. Of course you're gonna have that one crazy guy who thinks Trump being in office will finally get him his state mandated girlfriend. Which is why I say that most young men are simply just voting for things that benefit them from now on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:38 PM
-1

It's more so the fact that he aligns himself with a more traditional lifestyle that really appeals to a lot of young Gen Z men who are slowly becoming more and more Tradcon. And I really think it's because the vast majority of young men just can't compete in today's dating climate so they want to reset everything back to a simpler time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:23 PM
10

For every man vlogging with his QT van gf.. There's probably 40 guys alone in their vans rotting in a Walmart parking lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:18 PM
-4

Your anecdotal experience doesn't mean men have an easier time finding relationships when living alternative lifestyles. Considering way more men live the van life and other niche existences comparatively to women. So once again it's a supply and demand issue of there being lots of van living alternative lifestyle men and not enough women for them to go around. Which is why I make the point that the current dating landscape is beneficial to women who want to lead an unconventional lifestyle as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:17 PM
1

Men back then actually could, considering that Obama was in office from 2009-2017 and he passed a lot of laws that advanced women's rights like the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would have prohibited discrimination in hiring and employment based on sexual orientation or gender identity**. Additionally, he expanded protected categories in federal hiring and contracting to include gender identity and sexual orientation. First Lady Michelle Obama also played a prominent role, advocating …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 06:09 PM
-2

I think for the most part men as a whole just have nothing in common with women anymore. They literally don't need us for anything. They can make their own money. Buy their own House. So now that we have been taken out of the equation women seem to only be giving up their free time to a very few select group of men. Which is fine but it has also had the unforseen consequence of most young men not being able to understand or empathize with female issues. Since according to recent surveys 60% of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 05:54 PM
3

Greasy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:01 PM
1

Sadly for everyone of you. There are 40 men willing to pay for the date and give her extra money just because she is hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 02:59 PM
4

Thanks. I'm a proud Transfat.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 02:55 PM
3

Your username is wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 02:50 PM
-8

Yeah but what's the ratio of males living the van lifestyle to females? I'm almost certain males outnumber women in van living and other alternative lifestyles. Which is why I make the point that women are able to capitalize on the supply and demand. Which is why I say men can potentially sacrifice their ability to find partners since the pool of women living a similar lifestyle is much smaller.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 01:40 PM
-7

I would argue that since men's standards are way more loose than women's she wouldn't have a problem finding any type of man. Most men are just happy to get a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 01:34 PM
-3

She could get a remote job. My argument isn't about a woman's ability to find employment while living in a van. It's their ability to find a partner. Which is going to be way easier than it would be for a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 01:11 PM
4

I mean they clearly are if we have 60% of men ages 18-29 single. Like of course most men will have dated by 25. But how many of those men are in relationships? That's a pretty wild statistic to have 60% of the young male population completely single. So logically the women in that same age bracket who are single should also be 60% but it isn't. Which leads me to conclude that most of these women are sharing the other 40% of men. Which isn't too far out there to believe since we see this behavior…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 11:59 AM
5

I mean at least in the US. The amount of Men and Women is roughly 50/50. So women dating older doesn't really explain the 30% gap since like you said men tend to date younger so that should even everything out and make these numbers closer yet it isn't. It's almost as if women as a whole are having sex with the same group of men while the vast majority are being left out. Which ties into my point of these bare minimums are pointless to argue because even women don't know what the bare minimum sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 11:26 AM
12

But how come only 30% of women 18-29 in this same study are single? Why is there a 30% difference between the men and the women. Is it because women shower more? The real issue with this post is that women will drastically change what their bare minimum is depending on the guy. So if you have to have the car and the job and the house well then your face wasn't able to split the difference so to speak. Because I have known many carless Chad's who have no problem getting women to pick them up for …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 11:06 AM
9

No the just world fallacy is that if a man is single he must be an unemployed, fat basement dweller. Which would be crazy considering current studies have shown 60% of men ages 18-29 are single at the moment. So 60% of men ages 18-29 are fat, unemployed man babies? Like I said people on Reddit like to automatically make this assumption because it makes women look better. When in reality women can be quite contradictory on what the "bare minimum" is depending on a guy's level of physical attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:21 AM
14

No the just world fallacy is that if a man is single he must be an unemployed, fat basement dweller. Which would be crazy considering current studies have shown 60% of men ages 18-29 are single at the moment. So 60% of men ages 18-29 are fat, unemployed man babies? Like I said people on Reddit like to automatically make this assumption because it makes women look better. When in reality women can be quite contradictory on what the "bare minimum" is depending on a guy's level of physical attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:20 AM
37

It's always funny when this just world fallacy argument pops up every now and then and we all know it's bullshit. I don't know what's with Reddit's obsession with proving that men who are single must be unemployed, unhealthy and unhygienic man children that live in their parents basement and chronically play videogames and refuse to go outside. When it just isn't the case. I think if more people realized these men were actually for the most part normal and well adjusted enough people it would re…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 09:53 AM
–

Meme gender
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:42 PM
–

Arguing with you is pointless. You're the one with the 6'5" cheating husband. Your entire life proves my argument correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:33 PM
–

The issue is that men who are Chads will get everything while average to ugly men get absolutely nothing. You don't see those extremes with women. Even ugly women will get way more attention than even average men will get in a whole lifetime. Also it's ironic how you talk about how life is unfair but obviously wouldn't have that same energy if that was my response to Roe V Wade being overturned or any other issue that directly affects women. 🤷‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 08:11 PM
–

I mean existing is a strategy if you're good looking enough. That's why it's important for men to have Chad friends so they can see the true nature of women and that everything they were taught about them is an absolute lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 07:55 PM
–

It's either women don't know or just refuse to acknowledge that male sexual strategy exists and depending on how a man looks is how he will implement said sexual strategy. Like do you ever notice how it's always ugly to average men stuck in the friendzone? I've never seen a 6'5" man who looks like Chris Hemsworth stuck pining after a girl that only wants to be friends. See the top 10% of men can almost adopt a female sexual strategy which is sitting on their ass and pretty much doing absolutely …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 07:25 PM
1

You don't discuss relationships or your sexual encounters with your friends? I know how much pussy my friend got because we are friends and we talk about these things. As most people with friends do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 10:26 PM
1

They should give a shit if a man is Republican when they are passing laws that are taking away women's rights. But clearly Chad's Republican cock is so alluring they can't even be motivated by loss of personal freedoms to not sleep with him Lmao sooo pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:29 PM
6

The fact that multiple women would sleep with my Chad friend who openly wears maga hats and voted against women's rights and they'll still sleep with him is insanely pathetic and just proves OPs point even more that women are all talk and no action when it comes to any sort of "movement" to withhold sex from men. Which conveniently is always ugly men which they already withhold sex from Roe V Wade/ 4 B Movement or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 12:53 PM
18

Lmao couldn't upvote this fast enough. My Chad friend got the most pussy after Roe V Wade was overturned back in 2022. Women vote Democrat. But their pussies vote Republican.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 07:28 AM
5

Lmao no. The only thing Conservative Men are approaching is the ballot box to vote for Trump for a third term in office.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 07:23 AM
20

Gotta love these "it is what it is responses" when it comes to something men have to do that benefits women. Imagine if we had that same response to when women wanted the right to vote or to get a job. Those were societal norms too. And actually complaining is working because now Gen Z Men are the biggest demographic of conservative men next to Boomers and wonder why that is? Surely has nothing to do with the rigged dating market and how 60% of men ages 18-29 are currently single.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 08:03 PM
-1

That's not unconditional love. That's just helping someone in need. The unconditional love you're probably talking about is the one where men in mass will all vote for pro women causes like Pro Abortion because they love women unconditionally. Which I'm saying they would if most men weren't single. But since most men are single they can't sympathize and understand women's plights because most can't even have a conversation with them without having the cops called.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:46 AM
0

It's already happening because they got Trump in office.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:36 AM
1

You're misconstruing what men's unconditional love is. It's been gone over multiple times that men show unconditional love for their romantic partners not random women they don't know. Which there in lies the problem of this "dickpocalypse". Since we are seeing record numbers of single men. They have no partners to show their unconditional love too. They are now loving themselves unconditionally instead and voting for things that benefit them.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:34 AM
4

A lot of men view women with these issues as easier to date as women without. It's why you see disabled women with partners way more than the reserve because women are always in demand. It's pretty much Juggernaut Theory where a lot of men will view an unattractive woman as easier to get causing her value to inflate since you have all these guys going after the same low hanging fruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:54 PM
10

Oh absolutely. I'm just saying I really can't think of a female version of a micro penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:41 PM
9

Yeah it's just another brutal truth about being a man. There really isn't a lot I can think of that would make a woman so unattractive she would have the same options as an average man. And most of those things they can change. Like most women really don't realize that just not being fat is literally 99% of the problem. Imagine what kind of world it would be to live in if men just stopped being fat and it made their dating options quadruple.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:38 PM
–

Like I said Autism is a spectrum. And you're right. In like 99.9% of cases Chad can overcome the autism hand he was dealt. But if his autism is so severe it borders or is in the mental retardation territory than there is not a lot looks can do if you're screaming at the top of your lungs all the time and drooling everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:34 PM
13

You do realize boob size and penis size are two completely different things right? One is purely for visual aesthetics while the other dictates if sex is even going to happen. And yes of course a guy could have a penis so big it makes sex hard to have with most women. But he definitely isn't going to have a problem finding women willing to take on that challenge Lmao. While shrimpy is gonna get laughed out the door more times than not. The real reason this is an issue is because for most men dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:25 PM
12

See you say women don't care but why is it that almost every guy on the smalldickproblems subreddit sound like they're on suicide watch while the BigDickProblems subreddit is filled with humble bragging and stories about how their big dick got them laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:01 PM
1

Yeah the patriarchy is totally dead and has been for a long time. What we have now is since an extremely small amount of men have lots of power it means all men should be blamed for it. So since Jeff Bezos and Elon Musket have a cock and balls it somehow negates the fact that women are literally doing laps around men in every part of society from income earnings to college attendance and higher education.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:44 AM
–

It does and it doesn't. Because like you pointed out if the man is attractive and has autism he can absolutely overcome it because of his looks and lead a relatively normal life. But also it depends on how severe said Autism is. If he has the screaming and wailing his arms around to communicate flavor of the tism then most likely his looks won't be able to overcome that. But for most men even a mild form of autism is still a massive hurdle to get over because they already don't have the advantag…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:31 AM
–

I think it's the fact that Autism is a spectrum disorder. So it can range from completely non verbal to high functioning to the point most people can't tell unless they look out for subtle hints. So with that in mind it gives a pretty large umbrella for people to put themselves under. And given the younger generations propensity to self diagnose mental illnesses. You have a lot of young men thinking they are autistic without even having a medical evaluation to confirm it just based off the fact …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:19 AM
–

I think the key word here from this post is "autistic". Being autistic and male in 2025 is an absolute death sentence for your relationship and sex life as women have gotten even lazier during the courtship process where it's getting to the point that men probably do almost 90% of the work and the other 10% are women putting on their make up Lmao. Like if you can't understand basic social cues it's so over buddy boyo. Ironically autistic women have no such problem with dating and sex whatsoever.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:10 AM
3

Lol the guys in women's smut romance books are always Billionaire Werewolves or some cringe shit like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 06:08 AM
18

I would say it's only a circlejerk when you don't be more specific. Like first there are different types of "successful women". I'm sure 99.9% of men have no problem with a woman who is able to work and makes enough money that she isn't a leech on a man's finances. The problem arises when she holds a job with a significant amount of power and wealth and starts adopting male characteristics. That's when I would say the vast majority of men would not want to come home to a hyper competitive/hyper …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 01:48 AM
2

Damn I actually never thought of this. But with how absolutely horrendously down bad most modern men are I imagine it's going to be 10x worse in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 10:19 AM
11

Yeah it's not a coincidence that men feel like they missed out on dating around age 25 which is usually the time most people graduate college and start working. These concerns aren't just fabricated out of thin air. They come from completely logical conclusions men draw from the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 07:51 PM
13

But see you think that it will be better once you're out of college and go into the working world and live on your own. Only to realize that the job you're in is a sausage fest. All the women you see at the grocery store or the gym don't want to be approached at all. So now all you're left with is dating apps which the vast majority of men do not do well on. So you'll be kicking yourself for not taking advantage of the plausible deniability that college gives. Because everyone is there for the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 07:49 PM
3

Yep. It's hush money so they don't come back with "accusations" later down the line.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:55 AM
39

The reason people say it's too late is because at least for men. Highschool/College will be the only time they will be around that many women in their same age group. Men don't have an abundance of options pretty much anywhere they go like women do. It's in select areas and at certain times in men's lives that they will have those opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:49 AM
6

Damn to be a High Value Man I now have to be a Dominican James Bond. Who speaks 5 languages and drives race cars? Hypergamy is alive and well.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 04:05 PM
–

Funny how when you change the wording from "sex is not a need" to "fidelity is not a need" you start seeing the jimmies getting rustled lol. You're just making women mad because they think a circular metal ring should keep their man faithful. And is it a morbid way to look at dating and relationships? Yes but let's be honest. At the end of the day the way men court women now is a relatively new concept when you compare the entire time span of human history.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:47 PM
6

Did you ever stop to think that the men who are outside with their girlfriend make up a very small percentage of men who are actively dating. Think about it. Of course you're going to see men in relationships outside. But what you don't see is the thousands of single loser men rotting at home because they have no reason to go outside. Like I said before. There are women who like average men. But there just isn't enough of those women to go around for every average guy. I can go to the mall and o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:29 PM
2

But see it is an issue because of women's ever increasing standards. 6' 4" is the new 6' 2" and you're seeing that with penis size as well. Your stats aren't wrong. It's just women don't care about what the average is. Most women want a man well over six feet when I think less than 10% of the male population in the US is over 6 ft. And I am sure there are women who hate big penises and like men who are average height. But those women are few and far between and average men aren't implementing st…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:21 PM
3

Yes you correct there are subs where people complain about a whole host of things. But those subs have nothing to do with the context of this post and the point I am making. If you look at the posts made in BigDickProblems you will rarely see men bemoaning how their size prevents them from dating or having sex. While with SmallDickProblems you very rarely find a positive post and it seems for the vast majority of posts show that having a small penis is a major detriment to having relationships a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:11 PM
7

Untill you stop listening to what women say and start watching what they do you're just gonna give yourself endless headaches. If women didn't care about penis size. We wouldn't have entire subreddits dedicated to men complaining about how horrible their lives are because they have small dicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:54 PM
3

While I agree all these points you made are nice for a man to have. Most of these things aren't going to change the situation a lot of men are in nowadays. Getting a haircut isn't going to make a guy taller. Having a nice personality isn't going to make his penis bigger either. Most of the things that actually make men attractive to women are things they cannot change. Believe me. If these things you mentioned actually worked. The way men date would change over night. The real reason men act the…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:44 PM
11

Actually no. Studies have shown that when men use Online Dating Apps. Men's swipe rate reflects in a bell curve on a graph. While when they use women's swipe rate data it's like a bar graph with the hot men being all the way at the top and everyone else being at the bottom.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 04:57 AM
12

Yes and it just so happens every chick is going for the 6ft+ White Guy when it's Online Dating. How strange. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 03:10 AM
11

No my point is women pretending to like Raj the 5'3" Indian Petco Manager when people are watching them but will only swipe right on Kent the captain of the football team on Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 01:47 AM
21

Yeah apparently according to Blue Pill Logic. Online Dating Apps are in a completely separate alternate reality. I think the reason why they keep saying "Online Dating Apps aren't real life" is because it shows what women actually want when no one is watching them. Which is the same top 1% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 11:18 PM
8

Funny. She really thought she ate with this post and actually just proved Hypergamy and the Red Pill right again. Can't wait till 2048. When we start seeing posts on here about how being 7' 9" is too short and Men who make less than 10 million dollars a year are dusty broke losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 01:18 AM
19

Men can accept anything you want them to but don't be surprised when they vote and act accordingly to their own interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 01:03 AM
0

I'm sorry you feel that way. 🎻🤏
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:38 PM
1

That's exactly my point. It's really the supply and demand of the sexual market place that makes men and women act the way they do. Women are flooded with attention from men so obviously in response to that they are going to be picky with the men they want to sleep with and only choose the very best. While men on the other hand have literally nothing most times so they're going to take what they can get for the most part . Have you ever noticed that when men get more money and more fame their st…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:21 PM
-2

Well of course you slept with some fugly dudes because they did the extra steps that the top 1% of men don't have to which is to be a friend first. And that's fine you're not interested in sex with Movie Star level hot men you don't know because the vast majority of women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:10 PM
1

Like I said I think few seek it out because they haven't found a man with a high enough sexual market value to make them want to. There are plenty of stories on here of women going home within 10 minutes of meeting a man because he was so attractive. Women know who they can and can't play that game with. When he is the top 1% of men. They know that if they try to make him a friend first or extend the amount of time he has to wait for sex another woman will come along and just fill the spot she w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 08:57 PM
19

I think women are just as capable as men to have the "male version" of casual sex with complete strangers if the man is hot enough. I think the reason most women don't is because most men don't sexually excite them enough for them to want to take that risk so the men have to perform extra steps to get them comfortable enough since their physical looks aren't doing that alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 08:50 PM
10

I agree but also the advice people like Andrew Tate and The RedPill give do work. That's why you see so many men listen to what these groups have to say. If BluePill advice like just be nice to women and be yourself worked. Well then Andrew Tate wouldn't be a household name. And it's really because when you look at the two approaches. While I agree being nice and being yourself can work on some women. Men who haven't gotten anything in years or anything ever frankly aren't looking to implement s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 08:45 PM
–

That doesn't even make sense. Obviously when you get together with someone, one of the reasons is because you find them physically attractive so why would you neglect your own health and self care? The things that you did that attracted your partner to you in the first place. And then call it "sacrificing for a relationship". Sounds more like self sabotaging a relationship to me. Seems more like the honeymoon ends. You got the guy or girl so you get lazy. Don't try anymore. And think your partne…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:23 AM
5

Well since OP never specified what particular thing a wife or girlfriend would have to do to make their partner mad. That only leaves me with my own personal assumptions. And there are plenty of things a woman can do that can make her partner retract his love. Like if she is taking money from him without his knowledge or cheating. Like I said we don't know the specifics of what justifies this behavior since OP never fully explained themselves. So I am just thinking of the extremes. But like I sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 07:12 AM
3

No gonna lie if the guy in the thumbnail of this post did any of the things being suggested he would go straight to prison.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:58 AM
15

This just in women of Reddit are shocked to find out that if you treat your husbands like shit they will withhold certain "privileges" in a relationship. Like love, affection and acts of service. Now back to you Tom with Sports....
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:49 AM
24

Yeah seriously. Maybe like a few years ago I would say this post was pertinent. But with everything going on from the 2024 election win of Donald Trump. To the complete shift in the sociopolitical landscape. I would say if you're a MGTOW this is the peak of the movement right now. Which is the complete opposite of what most of normie Reddit likes to spout. Which is that the movement is small and filled with just sad old bald fat men who are rotting in their basements. Which clearly isn't true si…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:44 AM
26

Imagine not wanting to have the privilege of being a "gentleman" and paying for a girl's meal who has probably seen more poundings than Omaha Beach on D Day.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 07:30 AM
13

I don't think it's necessarily a solution to the problem but more of a symptom. Most men will never even come close to having the optionality an average woman has. It's why when men get a little money or status or fame they go nuts and start fucking like their lives depend on it. I think what OP is arguing is that would men act like this around sex if they were given the same opportunities that women got when they were younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:47 PM
-2

It's because despite getting flooded with attention and likes and matches they still have to go through all those messages to find the ones they like. Those poor women. 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:41 PM
2

I know. But if women were regulated to dating websites which meant being stuck inside on a computer it never would have gotten this bad. Having an app that's lets you date and fuck anyone in the world while being on a phone that goes with you and is on your person 24/7 365 made it a million times worse. All I am saying is you needed both for this to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:11 PM
7

It wasn't dating apps. It was dating apps combined with smart phones. Once women had the ability to date any man in the entire world in the palm of their hand it was the death nail for dating and relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:08 PM
–

Women do that when they’re interested. My trainer has women all over him every time he goes out. I’ve seen it. Women pursue when they want. If they don’t, they’re not interested enough. There’s no need to get them to do anything. Your anecdotal example of your trainer doesn't change the fact that the vast majority of men aren't getting approached.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:05 PM
–

Getting so many likes and messages is crap because those guys have done the same with hundreds of other women and it’s all based superficially on your appearance. It’s meaningless. Lmao what else are they supposed to base it on. When all they have are pictures and words to go off of? Also do you really think a guy is gonna send a hand crafted well thought out message when it's most likely not even gonna be seen? And it's kind of ironic this want for unique and hand crafted messages when every me…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 11:56 AM
–

My teenage son has quite a number girls making moves on him. I’ve made the first move with a bunch of guys on dating apps. Women do absolutely pursue when they’re interested Cool now have every woman do that and we will get somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 11:51 AM
–

Except that women are actively leaving, since most of those messages are shit. Most men are perfectly pleasant people in the flesh, who unfortunately cannot translate that online. Are they? Have you checked all of them? You're telling me that all the hundred if not thousands of messages men send on online dating are all shit? Not one genuine respectful message. You can't. You can't "make dating fair" because it isn't fair. And it's never been fair, it's why women have been forced into servitude.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:58 AM
–

Absolutely no comment I have posted has even come close to advocating for rape. But keep putting words in my mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:28 AM
–

This isn't a loneliness epidemic, it's a lack of romance epidemic. Lack of romantic options makes you lonely so yes it is a loneliness epidemic. How would you do this? I just told you with my comment above. What incentives are you going to put in place for this to be the case? What incentives? The incentive is making dating fair for both men and women. This is already an option. They also don't work for women since there's only 30% on them. They clearly do work. Since women have reported getting…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:26 AM
–

I'm actually not considering most men can't even approach a woman now without the fear of being shamed or ridiculed or worse face severe legal consequences. So they can't even have an equal opportunity since most men can't even get the chance to talk to women let alone want an equal outcome for which you seem to think is what I am for. Also when we break down dating as a whole. It's a social construct. No one sat down and said men will do X and women will do Y. It just formed that way over time.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:18 AM
–

Making dating more fair. Break the societal norms of having men make the first move. Stop using dating apps since they clearly only work for women and a small number of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:03 AM
–

If you Google Feminism it says "the belief in and advocacy for the social, economic, and political equality of all genders, striving to dismantle systems of oppression and discrimination based on gender." So how would dating not be a part of the social aspect of equality? I would actually argue that women have more rights now then they ever had in recorded human history. Just by the fact that they are out pacing men in every aspect from education to income level.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 09:30 AM
–

No where in my comment did I even come close to saying this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 09:12 AM
–

Why is it that whenever the discussion of women's problems comes up it's about what's fair and what's right. But then we talk about the male loneliness epidemic and it's women don't owe you anything and dating is not fair and life's not fair. So okay then why are you guys shocked when lonely men take this same logic you have been spotting for years and apply it to themselves and only look out for their best interests? It's like if you built a house for someone and then the payment you got for bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 08:13 AM
2

I guess you've never seen the experiment where someone used a male model's pictures. And made an Online Dating Profile and wrote in the bio he was a Nazi. And a sex offender and still got tons and matches and women wanting to go on dates and have sex with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:58 AM
–

He thinks his wife will give him an old fashion for defending the ladies of Reddit. What a noble knight he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:50 PM
1

Sister why are you focusing on that one line I didn't answer and not everything else I was saying? And yes I am sure all groups of men can have bad conversations. But I would rather have bad conversations than none at all. Which is what most men go through. And the reason why I say Chad getting bad conversations is because women on Online Dating aren't talking to ugly men Lmao. Look at the swipe rate statistics for women. Some of the percentages are as low as 10%. Now who do you think those men …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:22 PM
1

How is me talking about women not making the first move and having way more options than men on Online Dating Sites nonsense? These can easily be proven with factual data. And what I am dismissing when she's using her own anecdotal experiences that having nothing to do with the argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 05:05 PM
2

Thanks for your anecdotal experience of you and your friends. Yet despite you and your friends positive experience with women. Somehow 60% of men ages 18-30 are still single. I guess you must be in the 40% who aren't. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 04:38 PM
2

My point was that this dynamic starts from a young age. I had zero say in men saying gross and rude things about my body and nitpicking my appearance when I was just 11 years old. I gave no permission to be treated that way. Doesn’t change the fact that it taught me to be wary and not trust that just because a man approaches me, does it mean that I’m special. Women have these experiences at some point and carry the knowledge with them in dating. We are not just “fat kings waiting for a jester” n…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 03:56 PM
3

Men swipe right on everything because if they didn't they would literally never get a match. So you have it backwards. This was my response and then you responded with this statement. It's not “backwards.” You’re just arguing over whether the chicken or the egg came first. So I answer your question by saying we know the answer already to this question and it's Men have to make the first move because women never will so it isn't some infinite unsolvable loop of what came first like you try to com…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 03:25 PM
1

But we know the answer to this hypothetical "chicken or the egg scenario." Men have to make the first move so they are forced to swipe right on everything to get a match. If they had the same optionality as women they would be just as picky. And Men aren't reading profiles because they aren't getting matches. What's the point of reading a profile and carefully crafting a well thought out and unique response when she is most likely never going to even see it because she has so many guys trying to…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 02:43 PM
3

Of course. Likes lead to matches which leads to Chad's house so yes we are both right. And what's so funny about that statement is most likely Chad was having a slow night and didn't feel like putting in the already miniscule amount of effort it takes to get a woman to come back to his house. So he dips in the bargain bin for some easy fun and in return the woman comes out of the encounter thinking she deserves a man 6 points above her just because Chad pumped and dumped her.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 01:56 PM
2

You gotta love when women just assume men like being court jesters for fat single moms because dating is literally that broke for average men. Notice how you don't see celebrity men acting like average men do when it comes to dating? These celebrity men almost act like average women when it comes to dating and relationships. Hmmm how strange. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 01:51 PM
1

Men swipe right on everything because if they didn't they would literally never get a match. So you have it backwards. Women aren't forced to do anything. Men are the ones who are actually forced to swipe right on everything just in the hopes of getting a match. So women aren't actually acting out of self preservation but instead acting out of entitlement because they are taking advantage of the fact that men have to make the first move. So they sit back like Fat Kings waiting for the next court…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 01:48 PM
–

Women's over dramatization of the dating market and their options is just another sign of how truly spoiled they are when it comes to dating. Just imagine for a second signing up for a dating app and having hundreds if not thousands of likes and messages. Yes you may not be attracted to all of them but it's definitely going to do something to your ego. And the more likes and matches you get the more critical you are going to be about the people you want to date. Leading to preferences that are o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 11:38 AM
–

We are adapting. That's why Trump got elected. Men realized that they would never have the cards to even play at the table so they just had Trump take the table and flip it over.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 07:57 PM
–

It's comments like these that are exactly why Trump is in office right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 07:53 PM
2

I agree. I think both men and women don't love each other unconditionally. I just think since it's so easy for women to find a new partner we see more instances of women leaving more. But I think if men had that same optionality we would see the same behavior as well. Like we do with male celebrities.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 04:34 PM
8

Where in my response did I even say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 10:16 PM
10

The equivalent of what you're saying right now is "I'm starving but I won't eat from the buffet over there because I have to walk over to it."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 10:10 PM
5

It's posts like these that make me understand the lefts point of view when it comes to Billionaires asking for tax cuts.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 10:07 PM
7

Shyness doesn't hinder women's chances because dating isn't a "Shyness Game" it's a "Numbers Game". And the more numbers of people you're able go out on dates with the more likely you are to find someone who doesn't care that you're shy. That's why I keep telling you to use Online Dating because it gives you the best chance to meet the most people. Hell go make an r4r post right now and say you're shy or whatever and see how many men DM you who don't give two shits about your shyness. Go do it. …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 10:03 PM
7

Yeah that's absolutely not true. If you have an Internet connection where you live you have people using online dating. You're telling me you can't download Tinder, Bumble, Okcupid or Hinge where you live? Have you even tried? Or are you just making excuses to fuel this argument you're not going to win.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 09:32 PM
18

Apparently Dating Apps are in an alternate dimension according to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 09:05 PM
9

Nice cope. Online Dating is real life. If you refuse to use Online Dating then you have no argument here. It's literally the easiest and fastest way for a woman to meet men. It all depends on how willing you are to move your finger right and left. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 09:02 PM
29

Go make an online dating profile and see how "disadvantaged" you really are. jfl
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 08:35 PM
48

The amount of women I have seen on this site that not only are shy but agoraphobic and still have had multiple partners is actually insane. You would have to be living under a rock to believe shy women are just as disadvantaged as shy men. Also for more proof ForeverAloneWomen had to go private because too many men where sending the women on there DMs trying to date them Lmao. 🤡🌎
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 08:16 PM
5

Chads get asked out all the time by women who are strangers. I wonder what makes them not stalkers? Maybe it's their amazing "personalities". 🤭
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 04:11 PM
2

Obviously. Just nowhere near as much as men with the same disability.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 02:45 PM
8

LMAO HOLY SHIT!!! HAHAHAHA It's like you guys are so predictable it's actually sad. 😂😂😂 Of course you asked out a 6' 4" man. Only about 1% of men in the US are 6' 4". Jesus Christ the memes really do write themselves. "Hey I ask Men out! He also just so happens to literally be 1% of the population. 😉"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 02:44 PM
5

You can work on yourself for whatever reason you want. If men want to work on themselves for women who cares? All I am saying is when it comes to dating. Your personality literally doesn't matter. Which is why when you're trying to get women the things that do matter that actually affect your chances at dating are things you have no control over. Like your height, race and penis size.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 02:31 PM
11

Your idea of constant rejection and men's are two completely different things. For most men this means years of absolutely nothing. I don't think you would have this same energy about young people being "too sensitive" if you were born a short male. And of course he is very attractive. I wouldn't be surprised if he just so happens to be White, over 6 feet tall and in very good shape tee hee.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 02:07 PM
1

It's not an excuse. You saying that you know one person with cerably palsy who has a wife and kid doesn't change the fact that most men with a disability are single compared to women with the same disability. It doesn't matter whether the autistic women isolate themselves or not. They are still more likely to have partners compared to men with the same disability. Like I said if autism is a spectrum then the dating market for autistic people should be a spectrum. But it's not. It's the same as t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 01:52 PM
2

If you asked him out he must have had significantly higher sexual market value then you and most other guys. Men having women ask them out is absolutely not the norm. The actual norm is most men will literally go their whole lives without being approached once. And people aren't sensitive to rejection. They are sensitive to constant rejection. There's a difference. I think it's funny how most people on Reddit can accept how fucked up the job market is and if you told some one to just put in more…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 01:46 PM
2

I mean they are when women won't differentiate between the two. If everything before the sexual revolution and feminism falls under "traditional gender roles" then men asking out women is just as big of a "traditional gender role" as women not being in leadership positions. I think the main reason they aren't going to make this distinction between the two is because it would show women don't actually give two fucks about "traditional gender roles". Just the ones not benefiting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 01:20 PM
6

No I'm just saying that I think it is strange women hate gender roles. And Men asking out women is a gender role. But don't mind that gender role because it benefits them. But of course will fight for more leadership positions in society because those do benefit them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 01:07 PM
12

Wow you met ONE guy with cerbal palsy who is married and has a baby. That's it boys. Pack it up. This gender war is over. Another fallacy. I like to call this one "I know a guy" fallacy. And yes if autism is a spectrum why do we see the vast majority of autistic women with partners if it's a spectrum? Shouldn't the dating market for autistic people be a spectrum then as well to match? But no it's literally exactly the same as non autistic heterosexual dating lmao. 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:57 PM
16

Yeah women would never go for that. This "gender role" benefits them too much. If we dismantled it they would God forbid actually have to approach men instead of sitting there like a fat slob waiting for their servant to bring them another meal. But conveniently they have no problem dismantling other "gender roles" that don't benefit them like being a stay at home mom. Strange how that works. Both are gender roles which women "supposedly" hate. But one is just fine staying as it is and the other…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:51 PM
5

No it's not. Because if a man is let's say 5 ft tall and went from fat to slim all that changed is he is now competing with slim guys that are taller than him instead of fat guys that are taller than him. The main issue is still there. Men aren't judged individually like women are. They are lumped together and the best one gets picked. It's why you see in bar graphs for online dating. The men swiping on women is a balanced bell curve while for women swiping on men it just goes straight up with u…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:46 PM
26

The DisabilityPill is a tough one to swallow. Especially for guys who have a disability that makes dating a death sentence for them while their female counterparts have no trouble finding partners and relationships despite having the same condition.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:41 PM
11

Ah yes "putting in the work" another famous blanket statement BluePillers love to use as a catch all for any issue that men talk about in the dating world. As if men haven't been "putting in the work" already. The great thing about this statement is it works perfectly as a moving goal post. So when you guys say "get a haircut!!" "lose weight!!!" "get a job!!!" and the Men do those things you told them to do and still have nothing to show for it you then come up with another carrot on a stick for…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:36 PM
4

You're right there is a difference. The "anti social" and "creepy" guys are ugly and the introverted and neurodivergent guys are not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 10:51 AM
4

Women don't use covert contracts either. They are just using their sexual strategies which is having sex with a man as early as possible if they really like them. They do this because it works so well on lower value men who very rarely get laid. Pretty much getting whatever they want if they sleep with them. But they forget that Chad's get sex all the time so this strategy doesn't have the same effect it does on lower value men. The only way their sexual strategy will work on Chad is if the sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 07:10 PM
25

I would argue that nice guys aren't using "covert contracts" but actually sexual strategies. No man is born a nice guy he becomes one based on the circumstances that arise from his attempts to date. It's why Chad's usually aren't nice guys because they don't have to be because they're hot and women already want them. Nice guys have to be nice because that's the only way they will get any attention from women. And as far as them being too passive. Nice guys learn at an early age that any sort of …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 01:11 PM
16

I think at the end of the day you can only "choose better" in relation to what you can get. If you're a man who also happens to be short or ugly or fat. Your ability to choose is severely limited. So your choices are very few and are entirely dependent on what you can attract. If you can't attract better you can't choose better. I think this is why we usually see this question posed at women because for the most part they have the optionality to both attract and choose who they date. So if you c…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 01:02 PM
3

The reason why most BluePill Men will never understand this post is because they've never experienced raw, primal desire from women. I would say the vast majority of men have never experienced this level of attraction from women. It's hard for them to comprehend this when they have been going their whole lives not experiencing this and probably not seeing their friends experience it either since it is so rare. We are talking about Leonardo DiCaprio levels of sexual market value. So it makes sens…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 07:40 PM
3

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:33 AM
4

Yes proud Transfat.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:32 AM
5

Yes' yes. Women good. Men bad. I understand. 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:23 AM
4

It just seems like every time a study comes out that makes women look bad. It's always oh well actually it's the men's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:23 AM
2

Yes I'm sorry. Women good. Men bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:21 AM
6

That sounds convenient. Every time there's a study that doesn't paint women in a flattering light it is always wrong. 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:16 AM
12

🤫 Be careful. Someone's gonna call you the I word if you keep that talk up.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:14 AM
7

Why are you so quick to assume that women aren't capable of DV my guy? 🤔 And I'm just reading what Mr.Google said. And how would you know they didn't make the distinction in that study. Did you help create this study?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:13 AM
6

You can just Google it my guy. It says they are 44% more likely to experience DV while hetero women are 35% and considering Lesbians are already such a small group those percentages are crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:08 AM
24

Someone's never seen the DV statistics for Lesbian Couples. 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:03 AM
3

What you talking about Banana Man? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:04 AM
7

It's really as simple as the more attractive the man the more competition that he brings. Meaning if you're okay with having to compete with lots of women to keep his attention then okay. Also when the man is the more attractive one it tends to shift the power of the relationship and the woman starts to engage in what is considered male displays of affection and courtship. Like she would be the one to ask him out on dates or make the first moves for sex. A lot of attractive women know this becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 07:02 PM
-3

I'm just repeating your blanketed statement back to you but switching genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 06:37 PM
-3

Yeah obviously. I'm just pointing out her hypocritical views on relationships by naming things men can take away.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:27 PM
1

You have to keep that same energy when it comes to other conditional things. Protection can be conditional. Loyalty can be conditional. Providing can be conditional. A lot of things men provide women that they take for granted can also be conditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:03 PM
–

Definitely Woman B. We all know that a well traveled adventurous woman comes with way more competition from other men. Throw that in with a vacation setting and it's a recipe for cheating stew. The amount of stories I have seen posted on Reddit of women going on vacation by themselves and then saying it created a new kind of "wonderlust" and that they have to leave their boyfriend of 8 years is enough to know a well traveled woman is trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 11:13 AM
0

If you mean by prostitute you mean the ones standing on the corner waiting to get into someone's car to suck dick for a crack rock then no that absolutely isn't a job. But yes if you're pathetic enough to debase yourself for a man in exchange for money in a regulated setting that pays taxes and is legal in said state then yes that is correct. We probably were just thinking about different types of prostitutes. You're right they can be septic tank cleaners. But why not march for more representati…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:41 PM
1

Being a prostitute isn't a job so I don't know how those can be compared. Also the demand for Male prostitutes from women is non existent. Like I said women aren't marching in the streets to be a female septic tank cleaner because it's gross and hard. But you'll definitely see them marching for a job in an air conditioned building that pays six figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:59 PM
1

I agree but why do women only complain and march about not being in high powered positions? Why aren't women trying to make Brick Laying Jobs more diverse? After all the point of acquiring a job is for a paycheck like you said. Last time I checked Brick Layers make pretty good money. But alas I don't think we will see a mass protest of women to lay bricks for a living in 110 degree Florida heat. I wonder why? 🤫😉 Also women being a stay at home wife was a "trend" which like I said was a tradition…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 03:11 PM
6

It's not bad faith when you word your argument in a way that makes it sound like the reason why men buy a ring for a woman is because of the pain of child birth and having to raise a child. I said women get a ring for free which they do because they aren't paying the man for it so yes it is free. And then you say "well women get pregnant and child birth is painful and all these other complications that come with childbirth. Pretty much insinuating that the toll of childbirth is what makes the ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 03:03 PM
2

But that's exactly my point. Women are only crying about the jobs that like you said give them significant political and social influence. They aren't marching in the streets because there aren't enough female roofers. And Men can feel all those things too and still have to approach so those are really just excuses. The truth is women don't approach men because it's hard. Like I said it's selective equality. Women only complain about gender norms that don't benefit them but stay quiet for the on…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 02:39 PM
1

So you're saying not asking out men out on dates or proposing to men or buying them an expensive ring are things tied to being a woman or just child birth? Like I said if women don't want to follow traditional gender roles. Her ability to get or not get pregnant shouldn't matter. Also it sounds like you're monetizing pregnancy. Like since pregnancy can be hard and painful and time consuming I deserve X, Y and Z. Your argument hinges on a choice a woman makes to get pregnant. She doesn't have to …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 02:00 PM
-2

Your point only works under the assumption that the husband is a shitty partner and parent to his child. If the husband puts in the same amount of work the wife does into raising and taking care of the child. Then yes they are getting a big fat diamond ring for free. Like men aren't going out buying 10k+ wedding rings and telling their future wives "Hey since I bought you this expensive ring. I now get to contribute absolutely nothing when it comes to raising this child."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 01:12 PM
3

No one is telling you to do those things. If you're happy alone that's great. I'm just saying that women seem to want to not follow traditional gender roles like being a stay at home wife. But have no problem following other traditional gender roles like waiting for a man to make the first move in dating or having him propose or having him buy the ring. It's like I said selective equality. You don't see women marching in the streets because there aren't enough "female septic tank cleaners." But …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 01:05 PM
2

I understand the point as well. My point is that women will say they hate traditional gender roles when it doesn't benefit them but will keep quiet when they get a fat diamond ring for free and everything that comes with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 12:24 PM
22

While I do agree with women in the comments that they don't need to get married anymore because they make enough money to be self sufficient. I do find it ironic that they are usually the biggest proponents of marriage. I.E. you constantly see on social media women making videos saying "Oh I won't do X or Y until I have a ring on my figure." or "Oh you want wife privileges when I am still only your girlfriend." I think with marriage how it is it's just another example of women's selective equali…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 11:25 AM
32

This is absolutely correct. If we all woke up tomorrow and every guy was ripped and jacked. Women would find a new standard to hold men by that separated them. Because one, they can't date all the men just because they all became ripped. Women don't usually date multiple men they share the top man. And two, if being in shape was the norm then next they would just focus on height. So yes both these men are in amazing shape but X guy is taller so I pick him. This comment reminds me of the now exti…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 11:19 AM
12

No the real way to stop playing a losing hand is to stop playing the game in general. And we are seeing more men than ever checking out. Less men are working. Less men are in college. Their voting habits have changed as well to reflect that they're only voting for people that benefit them and them alone. And it's only going to get worse. The more you tell men. "Oh that's life, it isn't supposed to be fair." The more men will see that and act accordingly. A lot of things in life are unfair that w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 02:35 PM
26

I think the bigger issue is we never see women getting told to change their "mindset" because they simply don't have to because no matter how they act or what they do they'll always have an easier time getting a boyfriend/husband. I think when you take that fact into account it really makes this whole thing of telling men to change their mindset kind of bullshit. Like I have seen women on different subs who say they are agoraphobic and have social anxiety and have depression and have had multipl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 01:45 PM
53

I always wait for this comment when this recycled debate topic comes up. I don't know why we keep getting different forms of this question when this is the answer. Men and Women's singledom is completely different. I know women who are "single" and have multiple situationships, something on the side with an ex and just casual flings and they call themselves single. Most Men who are "single" are actually single. Meaning they aren't dating or fucking anyone. And the Men who are single usually aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 12:29 PM
4

It's different when the "rules and exceptions" can possibly kill you or make you have to raise a baby for 18 years by yourself. I just think it's crazy with everything that's going on these women sleeping with him would still risk it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:14 PM
2

I'm hyper fixating on his political views because with Trump in Office and Abortion Laws being the way they are this could really mess these women's lives up. And they are still sleeping with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 02:12 PM
5

My friend is "Alpha" because he's a 6'5" White guy who looks like Paul Walker's little brother. I know women most likely won't understand but as a guy. Having a Chad friend. Like a guy in the top 10% of looks and status really opens up your eyes to Female Nature. You start seeing all these rules and regulations they have melt away as soon as they see him. It really is insane. Like it actually blows my mind some times when a person can literally tell you something straight to your face with a loo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 03:23 AM
5

You can have a lack of social awareness and not be autistic. You shouldn't stereotype everyone who lacks social awareness or has hyperfixation as autistic. Autism is a spectrum and people present their autism differently on a person to person basis. Don't be ignorant. 🌈🌈🌈
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 10:03 PM
5

I don't understand how a man having preferences is autistic but yeah sure. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 09:47 PM
7

What if I told you most of these women are left leaning and just don't care because he is really hot. 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:58 PM
6

Bro ALL men act like this. It's just some men have the optionality to filter out high n count women and some can't. The men who can't are "okay with having a high n count partner" 😉🤫🤭 because that's all they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:47 PM
14

Damn I couldn't upvote this enough. I especially agree with the point you made about how Women create rules for Betas and break them for Alphas. My one friend is the biggest MAGA supporter you'll ever meet. Has multiple flags and signs on his lawn for Trump/Vance and gets pussy regularly. Despite what this "4B nonsense has been saying" he's actually gotten more pussy now then at any other point in his life. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:43 PM
2

It's not brain rot it's just simple math. Women have more options so they can be more pickier. Men do not so they can't. Now how they react to this reality is up to them. And if men want to feel slighted or defeated because of a playing field that is rigged against them. I really don't blame them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 08:38 PM
1

Yes their option is soul crushing loneliness Lmao. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 07:46 PM
1

Google Autistic Women are more likely to have partners and you'll see I am right.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 07:39 PM
-4

It wouldn't be a deal breaker because men don't nearly have the same amount of options as women do. So most can't afford to be picky. It's why you see women with Autism or Disabled way more likely to have a partner than the reverse. Also I am not saying having Autism or being Disabled is a bad thing. Just that men with Autism or who are disabled are way more likely to be single.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:20 PM
–

This is why monogamy was created because polygamous societies aren't stable and tend to collapse because in polygamous societies women will always have sex with a small percentage of men leaving the rest with nothing and those men who get nothing always end up rebelling. We are seeing this now with the effects of the sexual revolution. So many men thought the sexual revolution would mean that they would be getting laid left and right and the only thing stopping that was restrictive conservative …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:13 PM
6

No I completely understand what you're saying. You're saying that women should not date men who care about a woman's sexual history. What I am saying is that a man only doesn't care about a woman's sexual history because he has no options in the dating market. If men had the same dating options as women they would not date high n count women. So if you want to date a guy that secretly resents your n count but can't do anything about it because it's you or no one so they pretend to be cool with i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 04:26 PM
10

Most men don't want a high n count partner. It's just that most men can't afford to be picky in this day and age. It's why you're seeing a lot of guys adopt the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy. Because most men just assume that with the current trends of dating and mating that most women have a high n count. They just don't want to know the exact number. Better to think it's 7 and then ask and find out it's 17.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 01:18 PM
10

Why would any guy who pays $270 a month for a gym membership want to risk getting kicked out?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 11:48 AM
8

I've lurked on a couple Incel forums after the election and the general consensus was that most of them voted for Trump just to flip the table. Like they saw the board and saw the hand they had and just flipped the table instead of playing it. They know Trump isn't going to get them their state mandated girlfriends. But to them if it makes women's lives harder then they are all for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 12:07 PM
–

The sex strike that failed miserably two years ago when Roe V Wade was overturned is proof enough. Women will still break their 4B Movement rules for Chads. These rules are for average/ugly men who already don't get any pussy to begin with so nothing will change. The fact that they keep trying to use sex to try and get what they want shows they have no idea how different the dating landscape is now. Most men are lucky if they can even get a date once every couple months. Forget about casual sex.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 01:52 PM
–

But that doesn't work because Latino Men voted for Trump just as much as White Men did. So that would just leave Black Men. And they also voted for Trump more than Black Women did. So pretty much your scenario doesn't work because men of all races voted for him in mass. Which is why he won. So yes if women stopped having sex with all men it would make it more likely that another Trump would never be elected but also we would be extinct as a species.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 01:22 PM
–

This is literally no different than all the fat old divorced dads screaming from the roof tops that they are MGTOW and don't need women!! Yet constantly talk about them. We already have proof that the 4B movement won't work because the sex strike they tried 2 years ago when Roe V Wade got overturned failed miserably. They even made a sub that's pretty much a ghost town now. Sex is just simply too easy to get as a woman. It's like ordering a pizza but it's free and arrives at your house in five m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 01:07 PM
–

I feel like if that was true you wouldn't have seen such a turn out of male voters for Trump. And it makes sense. Because if men aren't getting laid. And also not getting dates. Because it's practically a crime now to ask out women.They pretty much have no understanding of the female experience. It's funny because the highest number of Democratic men was when Obama was elected. And it's been on a steep decline ever since 2012. And what else came out in 2012? Tinder. I feel like since mating and …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 08:46 AM
–

Exactly. Like I said men already aren't getting laid in numbers we have never seen before. Maybe if this was before the age of Online Dating and more men got consistent sex and not just the top 10% of men. I would say that this would have an effect. But most men are already used to a completely sexless existence. Hell how many posts do you see on Reddit daily of men in their late 20s who haven't even kissed a girl. Let alone have sex. I have friends that are unapologetically Republican. Die hard…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 08:12 AM
–

Disappointed with what? That they aren't gonna be having sex with women when women already didn't want to fuck them to begin with? You can't take something away from them that they didn't have.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 03:00 AM
–

If you look at the data. Sixty percent of men ages 18-30 are single. Even more haven't had sex in a year or more. And this was before Trump was elected. You can't take something away from men they didn't have. Plus we already know this movement will fail because women will gladly break their 4B Movement rules for Chad. This only punishes average and ugly men as usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter