TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Cunari Archive

View 43 posts and 590 comments by Cunari on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
66

FeminismCunari/r/MensRights16/02/22 02:37 AM
44

social issuesCunari/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 04:33 PM
28

DiscussionCunari/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 03:01 AM
27

DiscussionCunari/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 03:23 PM
17

GeneralCunari/r/MensRights11/03/25 11:26 PM
17

CMVCunari/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 01:19 PM
17

FeminismCunari/r/MensRights15/03/22 02:39 AM
16

discussionCunari/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 05:21 PM
14

CMVCunari/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 01:06 AM
14

CMVCunari/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 03:31 PM
10

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/18 12:59 AM
9

discussionCunari/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/22 06:16 PM
9

Activism/SupportCunari/r/MensRights10/06/17 08:49 PM
7

CMVCunari/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 07:12 PM
7

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 07:46 PM
7

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 04:55 AM
6

DiscussionCunari/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 03:21 PM
6

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 01:57 PM
5

DiscussionCunari/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 11:28 AM
5

Cunari/r/MGTOW26/08/17 06:28 PM
5

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 11:52 PM
3

GeneralCunari/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:24 PM
3

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 02:51 AM
3

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/18 05:12 AM
2

Activism/SupportCunari/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:19 AM
2

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 07:39 PM
2

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 12:50 AM
2

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/18 05:22 AM
2

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 02:47 PM
2

DiscussionCunari/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/17 11:39 AM
2

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 05:12 AM
1

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/21 12:45 AM
1

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 01:44 AM
1

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 02:30 AM
1

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 10:38 PM
1

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 05:43 PM
1

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 11:00 PM
0

DiscussionCunari/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/17 02:58 PM
0

discussionCunari/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/22 04:57 PM
0

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 12:36 AM
0

Cunari/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 02:18 PM
0

DiscussionCunari/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 12:09 AM
0

Social IssuesCunari/r/MensRights09/07/17 01:36 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

Obviously a stretch. You could only consider it possible misogyny if it’s more than one woman. Otherwise it’s just retaliatory violence against an individual. And such techniques are not gendered suicidal threats and self harm can be used by both genders as mechanisms of control. To be a misogyny it would have to be like a man bangs himself after he writes a degrading comment to women across his chest not a specific comment to a human who happens to be a woman
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 06:49 PM
2

Everyone is too focused on Trump
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 05:14 PM
20

I thought it’s bad for the reason that it’s platforming “bad faith actors” who want attention at any costs and you’re basically giving it to them. And he basically just allows them to platform their sales pitch And also it’s not really inside the manosphere at all it’s only one small subset of it. Could have easily said something like “Inside the Broasphere”. Or “inside the charlatans of the Manosphere”. Indicating that he’s only exploring a subset.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/26 11:55 PM
10

People listen to attractive women and validate their opinions so that’s why attractive women get to have a “victim card” and the experiences of other women are much less visible. So you hear the experiences of really attractive women in Hollywood or high positions in major corporations but female plumbers for example are basically invisible. The concept of male gaze for example is confirmation bias that “attractive women have it worse”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:01 PM
5

Yeah you’ll notice people just casually drop the p word in leftist conversations like “down with capitalism, fascism, and the patriarchy”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 12:23 AM
23

Yup taxi driver was made in 1976
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 02:29 AM
6

You are putting way too much logic against an emotional argument
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 06:00 PM
1

It’s not an argument made in good faith. Its intent is to frustrate you so you give up.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 07:03 PM
–

To use the fish or fisherman analogy. Fish don’t want to be caught can’t ask them but if they do want to get caught they could suggest bait that the fisherman would not think of using but they also have incentive to try to get free bait that won’t hook them. Can’t ask the fisherman either as they don’t want competition unless the fisherman is retired and has an incentive to help like father to son. So most dating advice is bad from all sources
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 07:18 PM
7

The people he platformed thrive on hate watchers and know how to monetize it. He helped them out
/r/MensRights20/03/26 06:47 PM
3

By only platforming extremists he is just as bad as they are. He is saying basically the only way to be platformed is to have extremist viewpoints. And these people thrive on hate views it is a reward for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 04:24 PM
-4

I’m not a feminist. I am asking in good faith. We know that men’s issues are ignored. My question is: prison is a leftist issue as it is used by a capitalist mechanism of control. So is it better to approach it from that angle and have it benefit as a side effect
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 08:21 PM
-40

Imprisonment can be looked at as a left wing issue. Imprisonment is how capitalism maintains the status quo as imprisonment is based mostly on class and secondarily gender. Even though prison is biased towards gender, reducing imprisonments should already be a goal of the left wing lens. And framing it as a men’s issue will get less support than as a leftist issue. The end benefit will be the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 05:22 PM
53

From what I see boring =poor
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/26 05:04 PM
11

And which gender is the primary one for teaching early education and raising young children to create those men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/26 04:57 PM
6

In most societal issues we pretty much only look it from the top for example homosexuality. Pretty much only the issues of being homosexual as a rich person gets talked about. For example how hard it is to be gay in Hollywood but not as say a plumber. Same with female issues it’s talked about how hard it is to be really rich and attractive and how hard it is to be sexualized all the time but not say being a female plumber
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/26 05:04 PM
13

As useless as the article is. At least they did not propose that the solution is to work harder at a job. Which is the advice men usually get
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 01:23 AM
1

With so many piece of shit billionaires I’m grading on a curve so ones like Bryan Johnson who are at least contributing to science get some recognition
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 08:02 PM
129

I have seen feminists try to portray the women as wonderful effect as negative in that women are expected to live up to higher expectations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 04:43 AM
6

It’s a human loneliness epidemic. 90% of social interaction is capitalism based. How many emails do you get asking for money versus asking for friendship?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/26 06:29 PM
-10

Not really. Seeing more unity for anti trump/musk/vaance
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/26 04:26 AM
29

There was some guy on Diary of a CEO podcast and people had a field day with it. He said something like should society intervene. To be fair he should know by now that you have to approach issues with males and sex carefully.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 06:11 PM
17

Mike Johnson
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 03:16 AM
26

That men who play video games in their parents basement don’t deserve healthcare
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 01:09 AM
24

It’s that the left instead of saying “Let’s end wage slavery” instead said “let’s reframe wage slaves as privileged and sell wage slavery to women, the disabled, and immigrants as privilege”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/26 06:42 PM
5

We are fighting for the right to not be literal wage slaves. Access to sex is a battle far from the horizon
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/25 02:19 PM
3

You could also include the feminist friendly mens movement(the much maligned mens lib).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 03:50 PM
5

On the one hand when people argue in bad faith if you give up in frustration then it’s playing into their hands and you have to keep refuting their arguments. On the other hand it’s playing into rage engagement and more clicks/views.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 03:12 PM
1

I see it as non-feminist lens of looking at mens issues from either a liberal(leftist socially but pro capitalist and pro work) or left-wing fiscally(anti capitalism but perhaps anti-woke or anti identity politics). I see most here as still right wing fiscally judging by all the equality of opportunity not of outcome
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 04:46 PM
3

For example being anti capitalist or for UBI or any fiscally left position but being for traditional marriage or being pro death penalty or any social conservative position.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 02:38 PM
2

You can be fiscally left and social moderate or conservative. I don’t know if many in this sub are anti capitalist though
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 04:33 AM
7

First you have to convince people to care about other people as a whole rather than just trying to get other people to work harder. Usually programs for disabled and “Marginalized groups” are about getting them to work harder. There is a big anti empathy movement going on now
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/25 04:30 PM
1

As a leftist I’d rather there be less driving jobs to begin with as it is a horrible job and not meaningful work
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 10:39 PM
-20

I don’t see the difference between this and say selecting which sex/gender you want to date. And the bigger question is we should be trying to minimize the amount of drivers period because it is a terrible job
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 06:37 PM
1

Five Nights at Freddie’s was about a guy working a retail job. Although most retail jobs are likely much harder than the one depicted in the movie
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 05:02 PM
2

It’s the internet so polarizing opinions do better unfortunately. Best bet would be to refute polarizing opinions and there are already people doing that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 04:36 AM
8

Privilege is based on preferences. The more willing you are to be sexualized the more female privilege you have. The more you are willing to work and grind the more male privilege you have
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 02:22 PM
1

Pro-male ideologies fail because pretty much the only agreement is anti-feminist rhetoric and anti-misandry(terms like toxic masculinity and frail magility). Things like male circumsision, false accusations, anti homelessness require too much altruism to get broad support
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/25 01:56 PM
1

a lot of women who have access to any women or man they want for friendships still choose dogs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/25 11:46 PM
16

The main thing the right offers men that the left doesnt is upward mobility but at very high risk. Dana white a right winger offers upward mobility via the UFC. Capitalism is very high risk but upward mobility. War is classic upward mobility and high risk. Left lacks that upward mobility. Left has to find a way for “the rising tide to lift all ships”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/25 06:28 PM
2

There’s social leftism and economic leftism. But people like Robert Reich and Bernie Sanders(social and fiscally left) really only address mens issues as workers. Other issues aren’t really discussed. They are both social and economic left. Destiny is an example of social left and fiscally conservative. He also really doesn’t address mens issues. I believe Tin Men is also socially left and fiscally conservative and he famously addresses mens issues. Joe Rogan used to be socially conservative and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 01:42 AM
11

“Workers” is how men get inclusivity ie workers rights. The issue with getting inclusivity is that in workers rights more is seen as better. Getting to work more hours is seen as a privilege. Workers rights usually equals more money not say work life balance. It’s hard to get left leaning stuff for men by getting in on workers rights But Trump and Musk strategy is so bad that very few people benefit. Eventually war and conquest will be needed to appease men. War is upward mobility for men and th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 02:40 AM
-5

Tinman who is regularly reposted on the sub is liberal(therefore fiscally right) and pro capitalist
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 02:19 AM
4

This post ignores the issue of sexual competition
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 04:01 PM
0

I always say you need ideological diversity and hire people who are pro union
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 08:13 PM
1

I’m way more tolerant of viewpoints I don’t agree with as long as they are anti trump/musk
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 03:04 PM
1

The thing is that men form their strongest bonds in early life pre/early sexual development. But men are separated via work. I speculate this may be on purpose
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 01:37 AM
1

Homelessness can be solved by economic nongenered solutions. Most mens and womens issues can be solved by human solutions. For example, abusive spouses can be solved by making it economically viable to leave. There are some issues like circumsision and misandrist hate speech that can not be solved by gender neutral solutions. The empathy gap and the relationship can also not be be solved by gender neutral means. Relationship gap is mostly sci fi solutions(artificial women, gender ratio). I think…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 07:45 PM
4

When most human interaction involves working in a job you hate. Loneliness can be better
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/24 07:55 PM
7

Abolishing gender roles would be almost impossible unless you altered the gender ratio or increased female sex drive or decreased male sex drive. You have to look at they the gender roles are there
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 05:26 AM
10

Never identify as a political ideology that shuts down people’s thoughts. Always argue individual issues
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/24 02:47 AM
7

My fear skyrocketed when the stock market went up which likely means rising inequality and more work for less pay
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 04:34 AM
7

Also for some men you have to do performative duties on social media that she can post about.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 12:26 AM
2

Moms do it with sons too. Try to control their free time.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 12:24 AM
5

The red pill movement which Andrew Tate I consider to be a part of is all “you don’t need women” “they are hypergamous hoes” “you need to hustle more and work harder”. And the logic of reducing female promiscuity and not male promiscuity somehow leading to less lonely men is crazy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/24 03:51 AM
15

“If you see something, say something” or “if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem” or rape culture in prisons doesn’t apply to men on other men I guess
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/24 03:23 PM
8

If a woman is attractive the decision is not which man should I go out with? It’s how should they monetize it. That’s pretty crazy. Most men aren’t even on their radar. They are likes or fans or followers. And they only hang out with other women. But society doesn’t want to improve it, it wants to monetize it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/24 03:17 PM
5

Men are only judged for not pursuing women when they are above a certain status. No one cares about the men who spend 10-12 hours a day doing the dirty jobs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/24 11:18 PM
4

Conservatives label their world view as good for men though. “Working 16 hour days to the detriment of your health is great! You don’t need women! They are all only fans hoes! Just keep working!”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/24 02:21 PM
13

Hyperagency versus hypoagency is everywhere if you look for it. Employers hands are tied when it comes to raising wages, offering new opportunities, and offering flexibility but employees are seen as having unlimited upper mobility and able to adjust to any situation and it they don’t it’s there fault. “By other men” I can’t think of good pro capitalist or employer comparison. It’s usually everything is always your fault. I guess “by other men” is a step up from “everything is your own fault tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/24 06:52 PM
1

Literally been told “get over it”
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:46 PM
2

Rise of social conservatism and fiscally left. In the past it used to be more socially liberal and fiscally conservative. Conservatives are tolerant of a wider spectrum of social beliefs but are very restrictive in terms of fiscal beliefs. The left let’s you believe what you want economically but is restrictive in social beliefs. That’s why things are changing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/24 05:54 PM
1

Not only that but every man is held accountable for the actions of all men and throughout history. Preferential hiring practices of women over men. Serves you right for oppressing women in the 1800s. Can't get a date? Serves you right for voting against woman's right to choose. Get made fun of for not being man enough? It's your fault for being part of the patriarchy and upholding gender roles.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 04:37 AM
1

Most careers and jobs are stupid and people should be praised for giving them up. The problem is that he didn’t suggest men should do it too
/r/MensRights18/05/24 08:00 PM
1

Part of it is that a lot of jobs are for the betterment of machines for machines sake rather than helping people. Why die so a computer can live?
/r/MensRights08/05/24 03:47 AM
3

About beauty standards: feminists don’t complain about how sexualized Sabrina Carpenter is because she has a small chest but they complain about Sydney Sweeney who has a large chest. Even though Nonsense is way more sexual than anything Sydney Sweeney has ever done. If you have small breasts, sexualization is empowering. If you have large breasts it’s sexual objectification
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 03:30 AM
1

Men hate men due to sexual competition. Women hate men who don’t meet their standards. This is predominantly of course. There are other reasons at times too. If a society does like men more than women it’s because women have the ability to escape via relationships. Men only have violence.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 07:03 PM
6

Intersectionality is all about maximizing oppression. Not only are you oppressed for being a woman, but you are oppressed for identifying as a woman, and acting like a woman
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 01:22 AM
1

The hypothesis is that dating inequality cannot be fixed not it can’t be fixed in realistic methods
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:45 PM
1

Increasing female to male birth ratio. Genetic engineering to reduce genetic inequality Socialist policies to reduce income insufficiency(more people on "living wage")
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 04:32 AM
1

There are places to buy friendship with women but buying friendship with men is usually cheaper
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:48 AM
1

It can fixed. Gender ratio, income inequality, genetic inequality. Adjusting those three things and others will improve dating inequality. All will improve dating inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 12:41 AM
10

Social media rewards the most extreme viewpoints with more engagement. It always seems like the easiest to refute arguments are most propagated. Feminism says that women have hypoagency and men have hyperagency. Womens problems are patriarchies fault mens problems are their own fault. But it also says that women shouldn’t be portrayed as damsels in distress in media but that’s what feminism does from the big bad patriarchy. But what are you going to do, extreme arguments propagating on social me…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 03:47 AM
1

Things that would work: altering gender ratio, reducing income, status, and genetic inequality. That’s that will not work: telling men to work harder
/r/MensRights13/04/24 03:51 AM
-4

Some companies refuse to negotiate salary
/r/MensRights13/04/24 03:41 AM
1

Feminism may have a role in this but the economic is totally messed up in many ways. At most feminism may play 5%. It is just a way to get the lower classes to fight.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 04:35 AM
28

Labor entitlement. The belief that men owe society their labor and that labor is beneficial to men regardless of any evidence to the contrary
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 06:32 PM
2

They call that hypogency for women and hyperagency for men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 02:35 PM
8

“Victim blaming “
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/24 04:20 PM
14

Male fragility, male entitlement syndrome, male tears, and toxic masculinity
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/24 11:36 PM
14

First, you have to get people to feel sorry for people working 10+ hours a day in monotonous/jobs that are not needed. Society wants you working. Not having sex. That's why the suggestion to men is always to work harder.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/24 04:28 AM
2

Compensation to buy the things I want? No. Interesting work in what I want to do? No. Work life balance so I can do meaningful work? No. You can pursue your passions(as long as your passions are trades, coding, Ponzi schemes, or propaganda).
/r/MensRights08/03/24 07:06 PM
-11

The thing about trans inclusion is that it is basically women going on strike and from a sexual economics perspective that is hard to make the sacrifice for when dating is already difficult. If there is trans inclusion then it would easier to include trans women as that is men going on strike from their gender. The problem with any men’s movement is basically you’re saying you know how hard it is with 50/50 gender ratio let’s have 105 men to every woman and have women be trans men so the ratio i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/24 02:12 AM
1

Men are simple. Men want to be deceived. They don’t care if it’s fake. Male sexuality is inclusive. They want to find reasons. There are always men who say they don’t like makeup or cosmetic surgery but their are clearly enough men who do.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 04:37 AM
16

Men want to believe women are a ten(except for some contrarian podcasts). They want the upward mobility for appearance for women. Thus all the products etc. Upward mobility in looks and status is far more difficult for men. Society wants men to achieve status is one way by working for a corporation. Thus why part of male “privilege” is working for one. The gaslighting has the purpose of convincing you to work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/24 12:37 AM
2

Don’t forget that women get double points for being born women and then identifying as a woman
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/24 03:50 PM
19

How do you know that your observed privilege(easier to get jobs and listened to by doctors) is not due to confirmation bias? You may be listened to by doctors as you are older and more likely to have symptoms. You may get jobs easier as you have more experience
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/24 05:43 PM
3

Women have more cooperative mating whereas men have more competitive mating therefore it is harder. It’s a supply demand curve. You either increase the demand for men or increase the supply for women. And yes you see attempts at decreasing the supply at men for example workplace fatalities but also men have less free time as they work more hours. This is of course inhumane but it is partially the cause of male disposability. There’s also the issue that women are more attracted to relative things…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/23 02:12 AM
1

I think it’s more that women tend to be more bisexual than men. Men are tolerant of same sex relationships but aren’t per se willing to be bisexual
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/23 02:03 AM
5

If men had life easier than it’s likely that women would have evolved to be stronger and fitter than men. Privileged men are highly visible whereas unprivileged men are not as there is no social safety net for men as strong as there is for women. With no social safety not men tend to die and the dead tend to be invisible. There’s also a winner take most in male hierarchies so privilege is more concentrated. But privilege is also influenced by your preferences. The more you like working the bette…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/23 12:17 AM
2

People throw around “you’re not entitled to x” like entitlement is some bad thing when we literally have a currency system that says you are entitled to things on the basis of how much currency you have. And you’re owed things on the basis of how much currency you have. I have literally had people say you’re not entitled to happiness, you’re not entitled to your maximum lifespan, you’re not entitled to a job you enjoy, you’re not entitled to housing etc. You’re not entitled is thrown around like…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 08:55 PM
2

Lonely men is the product of our gender ratio and that women have more cooperative sexuality than men(more willing to share). The only humane way to fix it is humane ways to alter the gender ratio. Genetic engineering of children so more women are born etc. The people at the top love asexual worker men. That’s why people at the top say all problems can be solved by working harder. If the people at the top wanted it could be an orgy fest in twenty years. They don’t want that. They want workers. I…
/r/MensRights23/12/23 08:44 PM
5

I’ve seen the concept of representational privilege and it is true that in the 90s you were more likely to see rich straight white heterosexual men in movies and tv shows. But that tide has turned and now there’s more diversity in entertainment. And across all classes and more ideologies with YouTube and TikTok etc. I don’t know where I’m getting with this but I don’t think you can claim representational privilege or oppression with the patriarchy anymore
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/23 07:45 PM
11

The internet makes it easy to use anecdotal evidence fallacy. You can find one anecdote to prove any point. Thus “the bar is in hell” can be proven with any anecdote you want. Couple this with the internet rewarding controversial content. Saying the sky is black gets more views than the sky is blue. And then in turn you have the people refuting it not being the sky is blue people but the sky is red people because that gets more views. Say feminist says “men are lonely because they are violent mi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/23 02:37 AM
2

I see women get told to lower their standards all the time and the self improvement thing too. The main challenge between men and women is being judged on relative via non-relative characteristics. Age, hip-waist-chest ratio, hair etc their can be infinite women that have those things. But only so many men can be the tallest the richest or have the most status. That’s not to say men never judge on relative criteria or women via non-relative criteria. Marilyn Monroe would still be hot today but G…
/r/MensRights04/12/23 07:56 PM
4

This is disproven by womens ingroup bias. If women liked men as much as men like women women would have an outgroup bias as well
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/23 04:58 PM
3

There are tons of people who are very social who do not get the sexual relationships they desire. Asexual Social interactions do not lead to sexual social interactions as a rule. The reason is sexual economics. Women just don’t like men as much as men like women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/23 03:32 PM
-1

Sexual competition
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 08:38 PM
1

Also externalized misandry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 07:11 PM
1

All my male friends are ones I made before age 18. After that other men are the enemy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 07:10 PM
3

Survivorship bias is true for women as well. Women who have “reasonable “ standards go off the market fast so what’s left is the women who have to read books to get the man they want.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 06:28 PM
3

Women(yes a subset) ghost men they aren’t attracted to instead of criticizing them
/r/MensRights17/11/23 04:15 AM
5

Women tend to ghost men they don’t find attractive that’s why they don’t comment on their bodies but to be fair it’s hard to have the capacity to find enough empathy for everyone. But also it does seem be a trend for women to overlook physical flaws if other parts of a relationship are good
/r/MensRights15/11/23 07:27 PM
2

The way autism is diagnosed is just whack. It’s basically victim blaming. It’s based on social success rather than objective criteria. And mental retardation is now clumped with autism too. Neurodivergence is the norm not the exception.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:16 AM
3

The loophole is being autistic
/r/MensRights14/11/23 04:09 AM
-1

Altering the gender ratio. It is already done in inhumane ways like forcing men to work longer hours thus reducing the time spent mate seeking, via wars, etc. genetic engineering to increase the female to male ratio is far more humane.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/23 01:05 AM
7

Queen ant sends millions of male ants to die while she sits back and chills
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/23 02:23 AM
10

Yup catcalling and “sexual objectification” is seen as misogynistic when it’s like the opposite of misogyny it’s just a negative externality
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/23 02:12 AM
14

Societies answer is always for people to work more and that will magically solve all your problems. If you have any problems it’s because you didn’t work hard enough. Disability? Forget a cure. Build a ramp so they can work. Part time work? For mental health. Forget it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/23 01:29 AM
4

Heterosexual privilege as a concept is ridiculous as you can’t be privileged for wanting things although I see heteronormative used more now. Working is seen as privileged somehow? And working is not a privilege. It’s a damaging concept for people like the disabled. Because fixing the disability isn’t a concern as long as they are contributing to society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 02:54 PM
10

Here’s what I would argue against in feminist ideology: terminology like toxic masculinity and male fragility, the view that work is privilege, the massively different goal posts between misandry and misogyny, the world view that men have an in-group bias (women are more agreeable with other women than men are agreeable with other men), the notion of heterosexual privilege(asexual is optimal for men since you have to expend resources for sex and bisexual for women since you get resources for sex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 02:53 AM
3

Basically autistic people proofreading coupons for accuracy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/23 07:16 PM
2

https://youtu.be/YnAUy4BM0w8?si=pSCcGYL4fmz9AQIb Like here proofreading digital content
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/23 06:11 PM
4

Autistic people are always assigned the most boring tasks at a job. I remember a news report where autistic people had job proof reading magazines for errors
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/23 05:35 PM
7

If you’re a white man say you are autistic
/r/MensRights14/10/23 04:44 PM
17

Being expected to do the most boring and monotonous tasks and viewed as liking doing them even if vocal otherwise
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/23 04:39 PM
1

I know this won’t be popular here but humanely increasing the female to male population. There would be less misandry. Men who don’t want that can have their own island of only men. One way to do this creating female embryos in a lab.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 07:18 PM
6

Men are the gatekeepers to instagram follows
/r/MensRights25/09/23 11:35 PM
4

Yup throughout history you’ve had to risk dying for power lots of people don’t want want to do that. Men have less options to they take the risk. That man have shorter lifespans is indicative that men trade health for power. Women who sacrifice their health in business for example accrue power.
/r/MensRights19/09/23 06:47 PM
1

But you have to enforce monogamy on both ends. Red pill/Andrew tate/Justin Waller is only about enforcing female monogamy. You have to enforce male monogamy too.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:35 PM
1

You’ll never convince me that the problem to the relationship gap is female promiscuity. That makes no sense. Women should be shamed for being in a relationships where the man is promiscuous and the women stays faithful.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:07 PM
1

You have to factor in survivorship bias. The people who survived managed to reproduce making it seem like earlier generations had it better. Capitalism has always screwed people over
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:05 PM
1

It’s easier for women to rise up beauty hierarchy than men. In fact it’s a sexual harassment trope. “You know Susie you’d be really attractive if you put on some makeup.” In fact it’s a trope that some women feel too attractive with some getting surgeries for the sole purpose of being less attractive. And there are plenty of women who complain “if I don’t go out in a poncho I get unwanted male attention” There is no way beauty standards are higher for women. I can go on forever refuting this. Fo…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:03 PM
3

There’s short kings movement but it’s pretty minimal effort
/r/MensRights16/09/23 03:56 PM
0

It may be a man’s world but it is not a men’s world as in the male hierarchy winner takes all.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 08:03 PM
2

Red pill has some truths but somehow it’s supposed to justify that Justin Wallen and Andrew Tate get one sided polygamous relationships with all the women?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 07:52 PM
1

As someone who has a diagnosis with Asperger’s and who has met a lot of people with autistic diagnosis I think it is mainly a socialized issue and not biological. And mental retardation is now grouped with autism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 04:09 PM
3

You can’t just turn off sexuality
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 04:06 PM
5

Ants are male dominated and men are incredibly disposable. Ants going on suicide runs all the time. Being in the minority is not inherently a disadvantage. There are minority classifications that are privileged positions like president or celebrity. It'd be like Shaq claiming he's oppressed because he's in a sub 7 foot industry.
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:02 AM
3

Misogyny has a low goalpost. For misandry it has to be systemic and not “by other men”. And they can move the goalpost for what systemic is too.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 06:10 PM
2

Taylor swift can literally right a song about male privilege the man but also a female empowerment song Bad Blood.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 05:56 PM
1

Height is the main privilege.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 05:45 PM
2

Systemic is a term that is used to move the goalposts as needed so that misogyny has an easy goalpost but misandry has a hard goalpost. It has no meaning without a rigid definition.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 05:43 PM
3

No woman complained about getting a life boat on the titanic because she was viewed as weaker…
/r/MensRights18/06/23 05:39 PM
1

But men can go out in public without fear or being harrassed! Which is the same that is true of a turd. Men have the same privilege that a turd does.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 03:31 AM
-1

Yup externalized misandry. Andrew Tate thinks men should be his unfeeling work slaves
/r/MensRights06/06/23 07:16 PM
1

Speech prof did it to start his following and when appealing to radfems wasn’t enough he changed his content to be broader.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 02:11 AM
3

Women are privileged in every species
/r/MensRights25/05/23 06:01 PM
4

You don’t get the lifespan bonus if you transition even if it’s partially socially constructed
/r/MensRights24/05/23 03:06 AM
15

Women use code words for what they really mean(and yea men and non-binary people do this too)
/r/MensRights18/05/23 07:20 PM
1

Make everyone an independent contractor problem solved.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 07:18 PM
1

Profession Neil, Soberside, the speech prof
/r/MensRights13/05/23 03:15 AM
5

The calculator is biased it does not include bust size for men. Men are not only selecting for height weight and money
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:39 AM
-9

I can believe that women rape men but that women rape men more discounts the manosphere’s own hypergamy theory. Like I can believe a women would rape Justin Timberlake but like a homeless man? Maybe a woman who has a mental disorder yes. It would take a lot more than one redditors comment to make me believe that women rape more than men. I have observed that men and women are equally violent and abusive but female sexuality is much more exclusive than male sexuality in my observations. It’s just…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:24 AM
-2

Men only hate overweight women when they don’t have the bust size to match. I can only think of times anecdotally when men don’t like ugly women pre puberty
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:48 PM
1

90-10 is an improvement to millions of sperm and one egg. Just have to get one more Pokémon form to have a fair shot
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/23 06:41 PM
1

Doesn’t work. It’s all justification to hire young attractive women. Older women have just as much difficulty.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 06:36 PM
1

The easiest victory would be against the feminist terminology like male fragility and toxic masculinity but nope can’t even some to get anywhere there
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/23 03:55 AM
1

The terms toxic masculinity and male fragility are hate speech.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:52 AM
1

The goal posts for female privilege and male privilege are not in the same stratosphere just like misogyny and misandry. If you meet them they’ll just move them again. Or they’ll block/delete your comment
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:49 AM
2

You expect me to believe that Donald trump Andrew tate and Elon musk protect the interest of straight white men please…. They monetize them
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:45 AM
11

When women say the bar is in hell they don’t man looks, status, and money. They mean that the bar for commitment and how the man treats her is low if they have looks, status, and money
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 07:03 PM
2

The legal term is depraved indifference
/r/MensRights07/04/23 07:00 PM
1

If we scientifically removed the need for sleep that would solve a ton of problems like needing houses. Shower in gyms. Have sex in cars(0 or more partners)
/r/MensRights07/04/23 06:59 PM
4

Many men don’t have a problem paying for female companionship. They have a problem with either how dangerous the jobs are or how boring and monotonous they are. The issue many men have is how hard it is to get the money to pay for female companionship . Society will say for the former you’re not entitled to a job you like and for the latter you’re not entitled to sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 07:14 PM
18

No one cares about male loneliness if for example you suggest humanely using genetic engineering to change the gender ratio to mens movements you’ll be shamed by a story about a radfem who wanted the male population to be culled to 10%. Even incel movements themselves are self defeating by shaming female promiscuity and praising male promiscuity which will create more incels. People care about the complaining not the male loneliness itself. Society wants men to be asexual workers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/23 06:47 PM
2

It’s because women get paid more than men for marriage, companionship, and sex so they have to turn into a negative “sexual objectification”. No one complains about sexual objectification when it gets you a life boat on the titanic
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:27 PM
7

Can you provide a list of all the questions asked? They are in different studies. This study only gives a sample of questions asked
/r/MensRights19/03/23 07:26 PM
11

That study did not use objective terminology and used buzzwords. For example instead of incel it could have stated people who have not had sexual partners in the last five years. Instead of misogyny it could have specified objective criteria
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:43 PM
1

The whole education system is broken. It’s capitalism not knowledgealism. We need too down reform. The gender gap is a minor problem comparatively
/r/MensRights17/03/23 11:32 PM
2

I don’t want to talk to men regularly either though….
/r/MensRights17/03/23 11:29 PM
2

Could some of it be due to confirmation bias? Men who are interested in things are more appreciated than men who are interested in people. Men who “gaslight” and distribute propaganda are compensated well but only the crème de la crème earn the money. As a whole men who are interested in things get paid more and as repeatedly demonstrated men have a lower social safety net so men interested in people fall through the cracks
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/23 05:44 PM
5

Body positivity for men-do better men. Workout. Get surgery. Body positivity for women- you’re a queen no matter what. get a reduction. Gain weight. Go without makeup
/r/MensRights11/03/23 10:30 PM
1

The goalpost will never stop moving for misandry no matter how many examples you find
/r/MensRights06/03/23 04:54 AM
3

Men are told “just be rich”
/r/MensRights06/03/23 03:47 AM
1

Well it’s mostly blaming it on andrew tates existence as that is part of his message. But there is some anecdotal evidence on the internet that college is a scam and entrepreneurship is the way to go. But in my experience boys would still be forced by their parents to pursue college and that entrepreneurship is a backup plan.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 03:45 AM
83

Feminists are making the argument that men are not doing college by choice because being an entrepreneur is cool and there’s no systemic bias. Information to counter this?
/r/MensRights05/03/23 04:51 AM
1

You just said that women are perceived as weaker(and that this is where men’s issues are derived from) and yet you also acknowledge that longevity(also immune system as well) is one biological instance where women are perceived at as stronger. Also women are perceived as stronger in social situations and as having more soft skills.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/23 07:07 PM
5

If women are considered inferior then is it socially acceptable that they live five years longer than men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/23 06:00 PM
6

That’s like saying that used car salesmen control access to cars but buyers control access to overpaying for the car.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 04:53 AM
84

I really think that some women really do believe that if a man is not successful then there must be something wrong with him even if it is logistical impossible for everyone to be successful. Like literally if a man is not a ceo with a harem of women there must be something wrong with him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 04:32 AM
3

When a man says a woman’s standards are too high he means looks, status, money. When women say the bar is on the floor she means the level of commitment “situationship, how she was treated, etc”
/r/MensRights23/02/23 07:43 PM
14

Where’s the dating site for exclusively dating men who smash the patriarchy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 07:08 PM
1

Well the fact that English and literature is pushed so much in school could be considered favoritism to girls as girls seem to enjoy that subject more.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:14 PM
1

I wish I was tall and a short sleeper but living four years longer is nice unfortunately can’t transition to that. The longevity boost is the fertilizer I want for my grass
/r/MensRights02/02/23 07:46 PM
16

It seems to me that female signs of pleasure moaning and squirting are more prioritized than male pleasure. You could do a study on search terms: squirting versus ejaculation related terms on porn sites. Also study which gender expresses signs of pleasure more in pornography. I get that being surrounded by candy sucks if you have diabetes but it’s great to people who like candy and don’t have access to the store.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/23 01:31 AM
12

How do men plead for their life “I have a family” so being an incel does affect whether you are killed or not
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/23 07:58 PM
1

The answer is biological studies. Men can work together to become immortal bring dead men back to life. Sadly, everything is competition for reproduction.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 08:26 PM
2

A woman with autism is considered quirky. A man with autism is intellectually inferior. A woman getting body modification surgery is leaving her true self. A man getting modification surgery is insecure(although height modification is more complicated). Women covering up their flaws with makeup empowered. Man covering up their flaws such as baldness insecurity. Woman claiming that all their problems are caused by the patriarchy encouraged. Man claiming all their problems are caused by the matria…
/r/MensRights12/01/23 07:46 PM
2

It’s a way of gaslighting people into thinking that working is a form of privilege. The rich and powerful like the message that feminism presents in that whoever works the hardest for a corporation is privileged which is why they go along with it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/23 02:01 AM
13

The political parties cater to the people with power. Conservatives to wealthy men and leftists to young attractive women. Hence why groups like the disabled get shafted and the key way to help them is “getting them to work”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/23 08:14 PM
1

Leftists silence those who disagree on social issues. Conservatives silence those who disagree on fiscal issues.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 01:12 AM
1

I see incel associated most with appearance self improvement. The only socially acceptable way to improve status is to work harder. 99% of incel forum talk is appearance self improvement that is not mainstream because it is not permitted on other forums
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/23 01:05 AM
2

It’s partially a way of subsidizing women with large breasts due to the positive externality it creates
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:14 PM
10

It is insane that labor is valued based on how much money it makes. Being the top of a pyramid scheme is more valued than volunteering to distribute covid vaccines.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 08:18 PM
2

Food is cheap. It’s shelter and medicine that’s the problem
/r/MensRights13/11/22 12:36 AM
10

OR social safety net so equality of opportunity or outcome is less important
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 04:52 AM
2

Autism has selection bias though. You’re only diagnosed if you’re unsuccessful. Not every person attempts a diagnosis.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 06:26 PM
6

Limb lengthening surgery and steroids and hgh would like a word with you
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 06:14 PM
10

The comparison of women to celebrities is a good one as they face similar problems increased unwanted attention etc. But there is definite misogyny out there. Look on the internet for five minutes. But It’s difficult to find a man who treats women worse than men. A man who treats woman poorly is usually one who treats men poorly. But there are some out there.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 03:35 AM
1

Sexually successful men have killed far more than any incel.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:46 PM
2

Equal pay for equal work is not really a goal that we strive for. People get unequal pay for unequal work all the time. There is no equal pay for equal work amongst men. Equal pay for equal work for all. Or equal pay for equal work for none.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:08 PM
1

It seems that increasingly women are entitled to more and more things and men are entitled to less and less things….
/r/MensRights21/10/22 07:03 PM
-8

I agree. We should get rid of the weight shaming and promiscuity shaming of the manosphere.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 04:39 AM
1

I would argue that "patriarchial" gender roles are only partially socially constructed. For example, paying for dates and being seen as a provider is not socially constructed it's based on supply and demand. Or male disposability is also based on women's intrinsic value and not socially construction. Some feminists believe gender roles are entirely socially constructed so I would start with that postulate.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 04:37 AM
2

Being straight is not a pure privilege being asexual(less expenditures) or bisexual(more options) have advantages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/22 06:59 PM
1

Then why don’t they pick disabled people?
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:27 AM
1

Feminism or at least feminism that is about abolishing gender roles can only benefit men if gender roles are socially constructed. Partially they are but there are many that are based on supply and demand like men paying for dates or men being the provider.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/22 03:23 AM
16

Feminisms is abusive mom, red pill is abusive dad
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/22 02:20 AM
1

Humane ways of increasing the female population relative to males via genetic manipulation etc.... Let people choose the gender ratio where they want to live. 95% female, 50/50, 95% male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/22 04:24 AM
1

Intersectionality 101: Is the men privileged? No then Does the man identify as a man? Yes then Does the man have the the natural biological sexuality of a man? Yes then The man identifies as a man and has the natural biological sexuality of the man they must be autistic!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/22 11:56 PM
1

If every woman become trans do you see that would be negative for heterosexual straight males? The gender ratio matters. Even 1% makes a huge difference
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:01 PM
1

By more evenly distributed I mean female power is less concentrated. People have argued that the female education system hurts high performers though by being held down so I could see that argument that enforced equality has negative effects. But in a lions share of male dominated spaces it is a small minority of people who get a majority of the benefit. Combat sports, corporate hierarchy, etc… Only one sperm gets to reach the egg.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/22 02:30 AM
1

I’d argue that in male hierarchies winner takes all whereas in female hierarchies the power is more evenly distributed. So that although there are powerful men on top as a whole group women have more power. Men have only gotten on top by taking power from other men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/22 10:36 PM
1

It’s not justifiability. Trans men is basically women going on strike from their gender and actively males the male gender role harder. Why should I have to support something that actively hurts me and makes my life harder? I wouldn’t get in the way. But I’m not going to anything active to make life easier for trans men as that makes my life harder as a cis male. It’s like a corporation advocating for workers unions.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 02:26 PM
1

No if a trans man is gay. Than the trans man is still competing for male specific things. I will tolerate it. I know someone who’s daughter has a gender identity issue. But from a social and sexual economics perspective the greatest benefit to me as an individual is to have as many male to female transitioned as possible with as few female to male transitioners as possible. Especially as levels of misandry correlate with gender ratio(along with income of inequality, social equality, social influ…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:39 PM
0

I just can't...I'm all for male to female transitioning because that benefits me. But female to male transitioning hurts me in sexual economics. So I can tolerate it just like I tolerate other things that I'm wild about. But I will never advocate for something that actively makes life worse for me.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 04:55 AM
3

Most misandrist men hate other men not themselves. I've never seen any man who hated themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/22 04:42 AM
3

Gender roles are socially influenced not socially constructed. Social influences are only one part of the melting pot that goes into gender roles. Yes Feminism claims to know the male experience and the male hierarchy better than men do. In fact feminism writes more about the male gender hierarchy than the female gender hierarchy which is interesting considering they'd have so much more first hand experience as a women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/22 04:36 AM
2

If we had a gradeless system then it would remove the bias
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/22 01:44 PM
3

In legal terms that is depraved indifference.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:09 AM
1

That’s a nice sentiment but only if the other side agrees to abide by it too
/r/MensRights06/08/22 05:07 AM
1

Bernie sanders esque leftism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/22 04:58 AM
2

Education needs an overhaul. Needs to teach you how to learn. There’s lots of stuff on how education needs to change. Alfie kohn is one advocate. Overhaul education first then worry about gender
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/22 04:55 AM
2

Austin Swift should be super successful if everything she said was true
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/22 07:02 PM
2

The speech prof professor Neil dr c the history wizard soberside emmaisafeminist are good tik tok sources. Soberside alone will get all the quotes you need haha. And if you look at who soberside is following it will lead you to rad fems
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/22 06:51 PM
2

I see this more in red pill communities than men's rights but it's to foster an ingroup bias. It is sort of a pipeline as alleged. Men goes to red pill community for help getting female attention. All the tips involve misogynist and misandrist attitudes. Man becomes radicalized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/22 04:36 AM
9

Any expression of sexuality in men is discouraged. Gay men tend to express their sexuality more than heterosexual men. If gay men masked as asexual they would be less discriminated against. I have never seen encouraged "locker room talk" about women etc. men are punished for any expression of sexuality. In fact there are instances where gay men are allowed to express their sexuality more than heterosexual men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/22 04:34 AM
1

But Elon musk and bill gates are not the ones fighting for mens rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/22 07:34 PM
9

Men are viewed as privileged due to flawed metrics. Men are not on top because people like men more. More men are on top because of winner take all male hierarchies. In capitalism, sports, etc winner tends to get most of the rewards
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/22 02:45 PM
6

Social influenced yes. Socially constructed no. It’s part biology, gender ratio, social influences, access to resources, genetics, etc. I did a quick search on social construction of gender roles and yes there’s a lot of proof that they are socially influenced but not really any convincing argument that they were socially constructed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/22 09:28 PM
-11

One answer is genetic engineering to increase the amount of females born. But male sexual competition is not the reason that shit jobs exist so that could be fixed in other ways
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/22 03:33 AM
1

misandry isn't the opposite of misogyny. They are usually paired where both women and men are abused in different ways. Usually with women raped and men being killed. Take the attitude era of prowrestling. Women were degraded and men took sick bumps etc. Usually when a movie doesn't fit the bechdel test there are men dying by the dozens or even in Glenglarry Glenn Ross men are mistreated.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:51 AM
2

I think the movement needs to narrow its focus on a few clear issues like feminist terminology, homelessness, the health gap, etc. and to have clear objectives like there are many instances where externalized male misandry could be used instead of toxic masculinity
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/22 03:17 AM
0

It’s easy mode if you’re attractive and are willing to sexualize yourself. Being a woman is not easy if you say want to be totally ignored and work all day
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:13 AM
1

One possibility is the power of women to go on strike from the gender increases their power as they have the threat to transition
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:09 AM
12

No. Society wants men to be working not having sex. Women enforce this too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/22 07:37 PM
2

I don’t see the fulfillment gap talked about a lot in that women tend to be favored for the more fun fulfilling jobs think for example in a band the lead singer tends to be a woman but the more thankless other band members tend to men. I see women get the more fun social tasks all the times in normal jobs too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/22 05:03 AM
8

The term womansplaining for example
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/22 08:08 PM
2

Some is socially constructed. The rest is sexual competition. But
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/22 07:31 PM
12

I think her content is too polarizing to extend the branch. It needs to be something more like thetinmen
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/22 07:28 PM
1

Heterosexual men don’t support each other due to sexual competition(which is why when Ukrainian men are sent to war the first thoughts are ukranian brides). Once men are in relationship then they care more about their family then other men. Men care about each other as humans not as other men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/22 03:06 PM
1

We have a system where “rent seekers” benefit off of everyone else. A lot of jobs have advancement based on political rather than merit. In a lot of companies the hardest jobs are the entry level jobs where the work gets easier as you move up the ladder. The discrimination is not based on sex and race it is usually automatically deducted from your account every month. But there is a fulfillment gap where women tend to get the more fun and fulfilling jobs within the company and when they have the…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:47 PM
1

A couple very minor things: the positive externality of a woman dressing attractive to be more appealing to Elon Musk and a homeless man gets to benefit from seeing that attractiveness but that's pretty minor. Representational privilege in media. Male only movies are more common than female movies but I really don't see this being a major privilege. Free porn. This doesn't outweigh the disadvantages but if we don't "own up" to our privileges feminists will say we're blind to them.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:35 PM
1

We do not have equality of opportunity. The most successful men got that way by exploiting other men and men are a finite resource so not every man can be successful.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:31 PM
56

People don't seem to acknowledge survivorship bias when it comes to men. If men are constantly fighting amongst each other and stealing resources from each other than of course the surviving men are going to be more privileged than women who don't fight and kill each other for resources(mostly). As for the feminist argument that women being due to women viewed as less competent. I'd argue that there may be a small misogynist component but men being sent to their deaths is largely misandrist and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/22 04:52 AM
2

There is no way to achieve dialogue with a feminist because it is not about the seek for understanding of gender roles/norms it is about ideological warfare. Feminism has made some concessions though for example they've had to address male disposability but they say it's a social construct of the patriarchy and not due to say male sexual competition and female indifference to males who they do not know personally.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 02:10 PM
1

The thing is that there's a lot of heterosexual men that hate each other due to sexual competition. So a woman can absolutely get organized enforcement of bigotry without matriarchy. And there absolutely are matriarchies like the education system etc.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 02:04 PM
1

it is a zero sum game for things such as jobs but that's due to the lack of a social safety net. Dennis Prager should have the best heart surgeon but the second best heart surgeon shouldn't die on the street because he/she couldn't afford housing.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:54 PM
-5

I think bodily autonomy is weaker terminology than can be used considering it’s making a woman give birth against her will. It is like rape from the inside
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 06:43 PM
1

And it should be pointed that pro-lifers may have caveats for example. It does say most cases. It may be men for example who want sole custody of the child. Although forcing a woman to give birth against their will is horrific.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/22 04:26 AM
1

Is there a good YouTube video showing evidence that she’s guilty? I can’t find a convincing proof video and I don’t want to watch two weeks of testimony. And from I’ve seen I did see some “smoke” coming from Johnny depp. I haven’t done an extensive analysis but there are some indications that he was abusive but they may be refuted
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/22 01:44 AM
1

I’ve had similar thoughts. The more you fit the male norm which is very hard and requires genetic elitism the more privileged you are. Same with being female the more female you are the more privileges you get. However the privilege is influenced by preferences men mainly a willingness to work and women the willingness to be sexualized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/22 07:21 PM
13

Is Bernie Sanders anti-male? What about Robert reich?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 02:06 AM
6

Some should have more money than others but no one should have no money at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/22 02:34 PM
2

That tik toker always seems so angry
/r/MensRights19/06/22 10:40 PM
5

https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 09:37 PM
51

Incels mostly exist due to income inequality and the gender ratio. People are fine with incels when they’re working 16 hours a day on an oil rig. But if they complain…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 07:52 PM
16

Survivorship bias. If a male managed to live he would be privileged. I have seen feminists to make the argument that because in the past 17 females reproduced to every male that explains male privilege and homophobia because males were scarcer and this led to patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 03:43 PM
24

You’d hope that women entering the workforce would result in trickle down benefits. But still some things like part time work are acceptable for women but stigmatized for men. Women are also more likely to have another source of insurance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/22 03:08 AM
2

Changing genders should not be easier to do than change jobs. Trans people should be the ones advocating for trans people not rich people in power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/22 03:22 AM
2

Yes I’ve seen toxic masculinity used when misandry is more apt for example male disposability in wars etc. No but men are a homogeneous blob….
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/22 08:11 PM
2

When women are sexist against when women it is misogyny when men are sexist against men it is toxic masculinity
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/22 06:27 PM
-2

Well men kind of have a word for collective male thinking called the manosphere but there a variety of different branches and dissenting opinions
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/22 06:26 PM
2

The book is too expensive for my blood but I’m fascinated that you took up the concept! Is there any other way to support it? The red pill community is not only misogynist it is also misandrist. It twists the concept that yes women are advantaged in dating and relationships to try to monetize and exploit men.
/r/ExRedPill13/06/22 02:09 AM
2

Like medical gaslighting
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 01:54 AM
9

We need to start presenting alternative viewpoints. Use a search engine on “misandry, sexism, toxic masculinity”. You only get the feminist view of those terms. We need to use SEO etc to present alternative takes on those terms. Also, support people like thetinmen and armo wit as alternative takes to Ben Shapiro and JP
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/22 04:26 PM
1

The “patriarchy” seems to backfire so much maybe the solution is to point it in the other direction.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:22 PM
1

Well less catcalling is not “a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group”. Men don’t avoid catcalling other men because of an in group bias they don’t catcall other men because they are sexually attracted to them. In fact men get unwanted street harassment all the time in certain places(yes mostly from other men) in the form of people selling things etc. There is no legal protection against catcalling that men have that women do not. There is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/22 02:09 PM
1

Catcalling is an issue that celebrities face as well. It is a negative experience that is commonly associated with privileged not oppressed classes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/22 03:32 AM
3

Yes this is a problem that some women have too. But if you made the same argument on a feminist board in regards to something like medical gaslighting(that it is an issue that men suffer from) you’d be shut down. A lot of mens issues are human issues but they affect men slightly differently. Men are expected to provide and not always by choice could be from their mother and bosses work single men harder. Of course women would benefit from resolving of mens issues but that doesn’t mean they shoul…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:07 AM
8

For example, if a man says he doesn’t like his job he usually isn’t given meaningful help in getting a new career but is instead told to “man up”. It comes from both men and women
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:57 PM
18

When men ask for help they don’t get help. They get advice. They get told to “work harder”
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:19 PM
21

Women can ask for help is the big one without it getting blamed on the man himself.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:21 PM
1

Lots of men have that preference(if it’s in the “right”places)
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 01:19 PM
48

Violence is a last resort. Women have more resorts before violence.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 06:43 PM
1

People need to realize that not all women are supermodels. Some are bipolar, have mental disorders, etc. and sometimes even supermodels like amber heard like can abuse(although I am not informed enough to say she is for sure 100% guilty)
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:05 PM
2

Intersectionality is rigged for women. You get points not only for being a women but also for identifying a women. And sexuality is infinitely more important for women. Nobody cares about a man’s sexuality unless he is very privileged. Only race and disability affect both genders equally. The other intersections basically don’t matter
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/22 09:28 PM
-7

She’s beautiful
/r/AntiFeminists08/06/22 09:25 PM
3

I’ll visit menslib when feminism stops changing the definition of misandry to deny its existence. And stop saying that it’s only brought up to derail conversations about women
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:51 PM
2

And they say misandry doesn’t kill. This is going to lead to trickle down inequality which results in more homeless men.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:21 AM
8

Feminism is not about the search for truth and understanding. When a feminist is proven wrong they do not revise their opinion. They state the “myth” even louder. But yes it helpful for third party observers and those who are undecided
/r/MensRights08/06/22 01:11 AM
2

The argument is if you are discriminated in one job by any factor including gender you get less promotions less Allies etc which makes it harder to get paid in a new job. The halo effect
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/22 09:50 PM
0

Income inequality is a contributor to that and we can’t say how much if any is due to feminism
/r/AntiFeminists06/06/22 07:39 PM
1

Then sexual objectification isn’t sexism isn’t sexism because you don’t even have to be on the same planet to do it and you can’t exert power
/r/AntiFeminists06/06/22 07:36 PM
1

For example a movie star is able to leverage their fame to be a pop singer. For the working class it’s easier to get a job if you have one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/22 07:22 PM
1

Social safety net: shelter/healthcare etc. so yes there may be unfairness but at least you won’t die because of it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/22 06:52 PM
1

If you’re going to go your own way go away from all humans not just men. Become a crazy cat man
/r/MensRights05/06/22 11:31 PM
1

Male and female advocacy is necessary. Misandry and misogyny isn’t.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 05:20 PM
1

It’s externalized not internalized misandry. In my mind externalized misandry is hating other men because they are sexual competition etc. whereas internalized misandry is hating yourself for being a man.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 05:11 PM
21

If a male was in elementary school he would be completely dominated by women. (Response to Afghanistan comment). Even if men are “extremely privileged” they should be able to advocate for themselves. Even celebrities need to be protected by the paparazzi.
/r/AntiFeminists01/06/22 08:26 PM
18

I don't get white and male privilege is so bad. When for example tall privilege or pretty privilege is totally acceptable. If privilege is inherently bad why don't we look for all instances of it? Their retort is usually it's not "systemic" but tall privilege is absolutely systemic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 03:39 AM
1

I think it's partially that being attractive makes you seem less competent as you coast by on your appearance and female are perceived as more attractive than males. Pretty boys are seen as less competent after all too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/22 03:37 AM
1

I don’t listen to JP anymore about gendered stuff. It’s tin men, armo wit, and sometimes Lauren chen
/r/MensRights31/05/22 02:01 AM
20

Also, my body my choice until it comes to allowing people to take PEDs and genetic engineering.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 02:00 AM
2

The corporate world is brutal and can be arbitrary. It possibly could be race/gender/sexual orientation but it’s usually just politics. Actually I think corporations like people whose first language isn’t English because then the bosses can’t understand their complaints and they like hiring people in wheelchairs because they can’t move as easily.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 01:59 AM
8

There are people who’s jobs is literally to stand still for hours at a time and do nothing. A lot of peoples jobs are doing monotonous tasks that can easily be replaced with automation. In fact being sexualized is to be humanized. People sexualize cartoon shapes because they look like humans. Sex is a part of being a human.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/22 02:08 PM
0

My theory is that feminism started with legitimate and important things like dealing with sexual assault, workplace harassment, etc but the need for more and more content has caused the creation of more and more issues that are polarizing and detract from core things. The same criticism can be said of the mens movement too. It can’t repeat the same things over and over again so it has to get into more controversial things to create new content. It’ll be interesting to watch thetinmen instagram n…
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 12:47 AM
3

No one should have to stay up all night at the office that’s inhumane. Sleep should be prioritized. There are few jobs that important worth sacrificing sleep over.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 05:51 PM
1

It’s only diagnosed if you’re having a lack of success. It’s not screened for.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 04:17 PM
1

Autism is a diagnosis levied on anyone who does not have “male privilege “
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 03:56 PM
1

Altering the gender ratio and having a social safety net
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 03:55 PM
1

Which is also affected by the gender ratio and income inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 03:55 PM
0

A more humane way would be via genetically altering more babies to be women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 03:50 PM
2

Even Taylor swift thinks she’s oppressed
/r/MensRights25/05/22 01:07 AM
7

Do you have a sizeable following though?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/22 02:44 PM
45

To be a male feminist you not only have to advocate for women which most people are fine with but you also have to engage in misandry and parrot feminist talking points without qualification or questioning them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/22 02:17 PM
1

Misandry is absolutely worse than misogyny when you include externalized misandry from other men with military conscription alone. And silence is violence. And many mothers and sisters and wives encouraged the men in their wives to go off to war. Also, even if a male boss is driving the whip at work. Women still encourage men to endure the conditions.
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/22 02:14 PM
3

Another possibility: it’s more expensive to hire a woman actress than a man(at lower levels of fame). Danny Trejo probably has done 10 movies in the time it’s taken to write this . Also, attractive females tend to distract from the plot
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 07:23 PM
2

They revised it to be “Misandry is the response that women have endured for years”
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 07:06 PM
2

Being a male feminist is not virtue signaling from what I’ve seen male feminists are the most misandrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/22 04:50 PM
3

It’s survivorship bias. Men have a winner take all system so the winners are a better off. We see this in capitalism, sports, etc. female power is more shared so as a whole women have more power but a few men have a lot of power. Men don’t share their power with other men unless the men has some utility which usually requires great sacrifice
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/22 04:46 PM
7

Heterosexual male privilege doesn’t make sense. If anything the privilege would for being asexual(least expenditure of time or resources) or bi or pan sexual(most options). Heterosexual female privilege makes sense because they are the ones typically(but not always) getting resources and men usually(but not always) offer more than women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/22 07:57 PM
1

Feminism defends its censorship with “the truth is in the mind of the oppressed”. But not all feminists are like that some are advocates without being supremacists. Intersectionality and patriarchy theory is usually correlated with supremacy feminists
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/22 10:15 PM
12

If objectification is misogyny then it is misandry too. Men reduce other men to their attributes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/22 03:40 PM
1

I think you misunderstood. I meant that the view that some feminists have about sociopathic billionaires is evidence against the most common patriarchy model.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/22 06:47 PM
2

A lot of feminists are anti billionaires and believe that they are evil sociopaths. This of course disproves patriarchy theory(or at least the one model that states that because men are the ones in power it privileges men) as why would a sociopath help other people. However, feminism is all about ideological warfare and holding the ideological line. A feminist can never refine their position as it would be considered a defeat in ideological warfare.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/22 05:00 PM
22

Women define men in relationship to themselves. My husband, my brother, my dad, my fan, my mechanic, etc. it’s a bit like a job. You’re meeting expectations fulfilling a role. Women have very little interest in men outside of the role that they provide them. On dates, it is usually the women who talks about interests etc whereas the man is asked vetting questions about their job whether they want kids etc. Women create female only spaces. Have onlyfans and instagram accounts where they don’t hav…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 08:09 PM
9

And when challenged on this point they bring up intersectionality but intersectionality seems only mention sex/gender/sexuality/race/ableism/class when there are hundreds of intersections. And the double on sex and gender to keep the focus on women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/22 09:27 PM
1

It turns out her performance in All the boys love Mandy Lane is autobiographical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/22 04:09 AM
4

see the thing is that men who act feminine in prison get privileges. I think it's more saying that men insulted in the way you mention are bad at being both genders. Feminism believes that men hate feminine men because men hate the feminine. I believe that men don't like men who are bad at acting like girls. When there's no competition like in prison men are far more warm to feminine men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/22 04:05 AM
5

I think some feminists are so extreme that moderate feminists begin to seem like saints.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:27 AM
14

Appreciate you. I support women. And a lot of women are anti-feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/22 07:45 PM
6

We can see today that women are perfectly capable of acquiring power. Are we supposed to believe that this power was only evolved in the last 20 years?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 04:33 PM
15

People with critical thinking skills don’t develop extremist positions they develop nuanced positions. Most people who can be dissuaded from radical feminism are already dissuaded into more moderate nuanced feminism or more humanist perspective by their own critical thinking
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/22 12:52 AM
12

Supremacy in the name of equality. They’re fighting ideological warfare using terms like toxic masculinity, male privilege, patriarchy, and trying to erase misandry. Using their dominance in the liberal education sphere to push their agenda and using SEO, social media to push their propaganda. Women have plenty have legit problems but groups need advocates not supremacists
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 08:18 PM
3

Toxic masculinity is way too overused to not be used for some sort of malicious purpose. I mean how is not crying toxic? Crying doesn’t solve anything. It’s involuntary too. Does feminism think men can just cry their problems away? Crying doesn’t give men homes. Crying for both genders is encouraged. Maybe for women slightly more with men being more stoic but I don’t think crying is a lot of place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 01:12 AM
2

Men typically compete in tournament based roles with winner-take-all. We see this in sports, corporations, etc. It makes things thing seem great for the winner but for everybody else it sucks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/22 04:21 AM
12

Feminists will just gaslight and say that white privilege is intersectional and that it just means you're disadvantage to your skin color(which is not true for example albinos) when 95% of the time it is used to imply that all white people are privileged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/22 02:57 PM
1

Also, autism and ADHD are disorders diagnosed mainly by opinion(and primarily male traits) by primarily moms/female teachers. Treatment and research is mostly done by women. Being labeled as autistic is almost never a positive. It's often to used gaslight men about their privilege. You're not successful, you must be an autist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/22 03:47 AM
1

I’ve noticed that a lot of male feminists say a lot of condescending gaslighting stuff towards men. I think they get a kick out of it especially when women cheer them on
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 10:58 PM
5

I think the apex fallacy also applies to mens perception of women. We mostly at attractive women in terms of female privilege but mostly overlook blue collar, etc women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/22 07:46 PM
4

Look at boxing. The top people make a lot but the journeymen take a lot of damage…. That kind of tournament reward system is all over the place in male hierarchy. Winner takes all. Women hierarchy tends to be more equitable. So of course in the two systems some men will be more successful than women but it sucks for the men who aren’t at the top
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/22 01:14 AM
10

Feminism can’t be bothered to even include all women. There are lots of uneducated working class women that can’t be bothered to learn feminist theories, terminologies, and rules. Not to mention SAHMs and sex workers etc
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 04:29 AM
2

Feminists are taught to block/ignore everyone who disagrees with them.
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 03:48 AM
-2

No it's externalized misandry. Heterosexual men hate other men unless they have some utility, they don't hate themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 03:45 AM
2

it's because of sexual competition. If a man fails, it's less competition for mates. Women don't have to compete for mates as intensely as men do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/22 03:45 AM
1

For seem reason Autism and ADHD doesn't seem to be a gendered issue dispute them being primarily male diagnosis(and by female teachers/psychiatrists/predominantly moms). By women because they claim that the issue is that the medical system is rigged against women. And by men because they consider it a legitimate issue despite their being a lot of opinion in the diagnosis and the there's even a catch all PDD-NOS.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/22 03:53 AM
3

Does cooking and cleaning really take 16 hours a day unless it’s a big house? You can always turn a husband on to time restricted feeding. Cook every other day
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/22 06:38 PM
3

You mean be in the video essay sign me up. I can talk about autism/adhd
/r/MensRights26/03/22 12:42 AM
8

Men are so vulnerable to gaslighting unfortunately. “If you can’t capitalize on your male privilege you must be autistic”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 04:09 PM
12

Yeah I thought the manosphere was overreaction until I heard the song “the man”(how could Taylor swift be blind to her privilege?) and all the ideological hoops feminism jumps through to deny female privileges on places like tik tok.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 04:06 PM
10

Do they make that argument anymore? I see more "And who's the men sentencing men to prison and sending men to wars? MEN!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 04:09 AM
0

Anecdotal experience no official expertise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/22 05:15 PM
0

They are behavioral traits not necessarily disorders. It also seems that mental retardation had become lumped in with autism. Autism has become sort of every male that has a feature they don’t like diagnosis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/22 05:13 PM
8

Feminism bends over backwards to say that misandry doesn't exist. Red Flag. They say stuff like "To the eyes of the privileged, equality looks like oppression." The problem is that equality is relative. To a feminist equality could mean men get paid absolutely nothing and whipped in the streets because that's equality. They say stuff like "Dismantle the Patriarchy" Again dangerous stuff because nobody knows what the means. Could mean male slavery for all we know. If the said stuff like "We have …
/r/MensRights18/03/22 04:03 AM
4

What will happen is that feminists will say "You're not entitled to have women pay for dates."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/22 03:56 AM
2

If there was a pay gap a non-biased way to fix it would be total pay transparency and unions for every job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/22 03:47 AM
1

Women are all over the ASD and ADHD place. From moms getting the diagnoses(you think dads are doing it?), to teachers recommending it, to female psychiatrists and scientists treating it. Diagnosis primarily given to males based on male traits and treated by drugs with side effects and harmful CBT.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 01:19 AM
1

If you point stuff like this out to a feminist they’ll say “in the eyes of the privileged equality looks like oppression” for any talking point with any legitimacy
/r/AntiFeminists17/03/22 03:15 AM
10

Everyone should have conflict with feminism red flags like how they address criticism and manipulate definitions of words and how even at the current power level they don’t care about male equality despite their message being a benevolent entity spreading equality throughout the land.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 11:13 PM
1

Well the education and psych system is mostly women. ADHD and Asd are diagnosed entirely by phenotype and majority of the time are given to boys. Is that example more convincing?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:24 PM
1

It’s hard because the goalpost is so much further for misandry than misogyny.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 08:52 PM
2

To profit off of male suffering is misandry. And a real estate agent profits off of male suffering via higher housing prices due to increased homselessness. A ring card girl profits off a male concussions but men chose to do that. Someone mentioned diamond mining and that’s a good example men suffer just so a woman can have a nice rock.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 06:52 PM
2

Externalized misogyny is already acknowledged as the “patriarchy backfiring”. The point is to show that women are misandristic too.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 06:48 PM
3

I’m trying to find an example that will prove that non reactionary misandry exists. Even if it is cherry picking I want one concrete example
/r/MensRights15/03/22 01:58 PM
1

What about replacing patriarchy with biology or society? You’d need a combination of both probably
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/22 11:09 PM
1

Thanks for calling me out can you please point me to some good male feminist content
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 11:49 PM
-4

Yup prowrestling, football, basketball, etc. There is a lot of evidence for this. But also romantic comedies etc all prioritize height too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/22 09:59 PM
1

It’s partially because women are viewed as scarce in the dating pool. Can’t afford to let one slip through the cracks. Unless that woman is violent and even then we’ll try to find a way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/22 04:24 PM
-5

I disagree. An egalitarian can’t address womens issues because and women are different. Feminisms speaks about catcalling(calls it a hate crime which I completely disagree with). Men would love to be catcalled. Equality would be for both genders to be catcalled but that would not be the optimal outcome for women. It’s like a celebrity. They are extremely privileged but they should be able to advocate for restrictions against harassment by the paparazzi and fans. And a celebrity is in the best po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 11:21 PM
17

I wouldn’t call a womens issue movement unnecessary. Women have specific issues that they need to advocate for. I’d say rather that it’s an attempt to maintain their privilege under intersectional feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 05:39 PM
2

I would like to be more specific but it’s a feminist issue and talking point not mine
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 05:03 PM
27

I disagree. MOst men have externalized misandry. Most men think they are awesome men and other men are terrible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 04:55 AM
1

Also consider that some men would have an attractive women around than smelly, hairy man.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:53 AM
1

Men still have to buy the ring etc. I’d say women are still gatekeepers but are pushy sales people.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 12:59 AM
1

Women on the internet call their fans who give them money friends or family or more i would say that’s leading people on
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 12:58 AM
1

But do they chose those men because they are good at being in relationships “nice guys” or because they are genetic celebrities or providers. I’d say it’s more like women try to take a man who has things that are good for her and then mold him into a relationship provider.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 12:52 AM
1

Men compete for any sort of female attention online
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 12:48 AM
1

Men still pay for marriage though. How can you be a gatekeeper if you pay for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 12:48 AM
1

But does she give you anything for higher relationship levels or just says that she’s entitled to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 12:47 AM
1

Men still have to pay for marriage though. How can men be the gatekeepers if they have to pay for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 11:35 PM
1

Are there any women who pay for commitment though? I mean there’s relationship porn I guess. But women don’t exchange resources for commitment simulations
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 11:34 PM
2

If men are the gatekeepers of a relationship then why are they expected to pay so much for one via marriage and gifts? It’s not so much that men are gatekeepers of relationships it’s more upselling from women. “Hon, if you marry me I’ll cook and clean for you!” “Naw, I’m good just having sexy time.”
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/21 10:38 PM
0

You’d never see Jason mamoa being told he’s autistic
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/21 03:00 AM
0

Even if the system did massive favor men you’d only have an advantage of less than half the population. Autism isn’t diagnosed by say functional mris it’s a diagnosed based on a phenotype. Therefore there are biases
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 09:04 PM
1

Yeah women gatekeep relationships look at men wanting a reply back on Instagram
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/21 07:31 PM
1

There are no males in corporate communications in my company.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 07:46 PM
1

Explain the breast reduction epidemic
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/21 12:37 AM
1

What if you're short but have a long wingspan or big skeleton? I think it's all about height.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/19 03:00 AM
1

Even if she was trying to kill me or maim me I would go through with it and defend myself
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/19 03:21 PM
15

The bigger your boobs the fatter you can be and still be attractive to a point. This includes implants.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/19 04:57 PM
4

Well look at the things are only cared about by men. Muscle mass and overall body size(including fat). A lot of men admire big fat and muscular men but women do not. The things men feel secure about tends to be less when it is only important to men: muscle mass above a certain point then things that are important to both men and women: penis size and height.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 07:00 PM
10

You haven't been to enough forums if you've never been shamed by a man about height. Women didn't invent the word manlet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 06:57 PM
1

The TRP and MTGOW and other spheres have good advice but then they always try to slip in more radical elements. It's the radical stuff that gets scorned.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 06:04 PM
-1

The culture isn't one necessarily created by men. It's one caused by the gender ratio and the female shortage. Men can learn to suppress it but it's not easy...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/19 06:00 PM
1

Everyone who complains about entitlement feels entitled that some other person should not be entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 03:00 PM
1

It's because to some people sex is better when you don't have to worry about pleasing your partner(although to some people pleasing your partner is a turn on). Especially as a man when female orgasms are harder to achieve. Some men want to get off and say "thanks babe" Can't do that without a power differential.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 03:31 PM
1

Why would incels ally with Chad's when chad features are non-transferrable? I've seen it happen. I just don't understand it...
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 03:34 AM
1

Male sexual attraction is in general absolute. Female sexual attraction is in general relative. Owning a cave may have been enough in the caveman days but not these days. Is it a coincidence in the 1950's where there was less income inequality there was less sexual inequality as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/19 12:44 AM
1

I would date any girl with big tits who didn't chop my dick off.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 06:36 PM
1

Then why are there so many breast reductions?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/19 01:26 AM
1

It's only assumed that men work harder because women don't have too....I wouldn't really call it respect. It's just assumed that women don't have to work as hard because of female privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 05:03 AM
1

Most men want more sex Most women want to be valued for things other than sex. Those studies saying that "men offer less commitment and women have lower opinion of men" indicate that women less SMV but if women truly want to go their own way don't they not want to be taken care of my men? Who cares if women have lower opinion of men if women are calling the shots? Seems like a win/win.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/19 06:05 AM
1

My issue is that society thinks that they are owed things from people. Society thinks it is owed as many hours from a worker as it will pay you for. It thinks you're entitled to followed it's laws. As long as society is entitled from things from people. People should be entitled from things from society. If someone is working 60 hours a week they damn well better be entitled to a living situation or they should be able to work less hours so that they have time to get themselves out of the situat…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 06:40 PM
1

Women don't dress to male standards of beauty and the women who do get shamed by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 03:56 PM
1

If a hot woman wanted to kill me that would be very unattractive. There's stuff she could do that would make her less attractive but nothing she could say.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/18 11:41 PM
2

Well most men would rather not have women in prison where they are not in the sexual marketplace unless it's a violent offense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/18 04:37 PM
1

There are too many men so daughter. I would only not pick the daughter if she wanted to transition into being a boy or was violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 12:06 AM
1

body. Large breasts, face doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 06:19 AM
1

You forgot that women are better suited to a sedentary lifestyle. Physical activity is less important for a woman's SMV than it is for a man. Both men and women can type secretly in chat. To be successful in a job you have to be able to suppress your sexual urges. You can't rub one out in a 9 hour day. Many successful people are not able to be horndogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 04:57 AM
1

But can you demand things that will make it easier to get sex, love, and companionship? A more favorable gender ratio, research into attractiveness science, substitutes?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 06:11 PM
1

When you call someone entitled it means you're not willing to have a discussion about the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 06:09 PM
1

Yeah but isn't true for women. Women care (mostly) about relative attractiveness(Height, status) and men care (mostly) about absolutes (minimum breast size, proportions, etc). So women will be more attractive over time to men but the same can't be said for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/18 06:03 PM
3

Well Phil Hartman was killed by his wife. Men blame the world for their problems; women tend to blame people in their immediate social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 03:25 AM
1

Being overweight is okay as long as you have large breasts. The larger the breasts the more overweight a woman can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 04:07 AM
2

Men doing things that decrease the availability of female sexuality. Hating male homosexuality. Slut shaming. Not hating on male promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/18 03:15 PM
1

It's true. Masturbation drastically drops male sex drive. Also, food(overeating) and exercise(overtraining) can do it too. It's that work takes men away from being able to masturbate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/18 11:57 PM
1

It's called masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/18 10:54 PM
4

Male sex drive already goes down drastically after we orgasm. Raise female sex drive. It's economics. You tweak the market to achieve equilibrium.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/18 04:00 AM
7

Fat woman are portrayed as sexy as long as they have large breasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 04:52 PM
1

It would be much the same except females wouldn't dress to attract men and would be more gender neutral. That's the trend that's occurred as women have entered the workforce.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 04:35 PM
1

The Last man on earth who gets to sleep with any woman he wants would be a sigma male...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 03:27 PM
1

Not if there is only one man on the planet....
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 12:50 AM
2

It's still neutral for betas
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 06:12 PM
3

I'm a man and I agree men are idiots. They hate male homosexuality and female promiscuity even though are great things for beta males. They are too many willing betas who don't challenge the policies of the alphas that hurt them and hurt the unwilling betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 03:26 AM
1

As a man I'd rather have 8 men gangbang me for 30 minutes then do a retail job for 8 hours plus "lunch".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 02:15 PM
2

The question was asking what people really mean when they say it not what it actually means.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 02:32 PM
9

But Nice Guys don't think they are entitled to sex. They're trying to earn it. They're upset about females saying "All I want is a nice guy" men being that nice guy and then women not wanting them. It's not a matter of Nice Guys being entitled to Sex, mostly what these nice guys want is a transparency of what females actually want in exchange for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 02:18 PM
2

Which attitudes?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/18 02:06 PM
1

I'm attracted to large breasts which supposedly have no biological benefit. I would take large breasts over any other potential factor in a woman. What about large penises too?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/18 04:32 AM
7

Well women can do other things. Lengthy makeout sessions. Intense flirting. Grinding. Etc. As long as the women indicates that there's an attraction. And the woman gives a defined time period before sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/18 04:26 AM
1

Women's value is also affected by the status of the man she dates. If an average girl dates an ugly then her status goes down. But a hot girl will still be hot even if she dates an ugly guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/18 03:18 AM
0

I've gotten much better advise from women then men in my job. Men try to hold you down and use you for their political gain. Men who don't do those usually obey the men that would hold you down. I've women are more helpful as long as you don't do anything that would hurt them politically. Sure there are still women that won't help but I've not had women that actively try to step on my toes like has happened with men.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/18 04:46 PM
1

Nope. Never seen a girl with huge breasts that was ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 04:37 PM
1

small breasts if a woman has large breasts it can overcome almost any other deficiency
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/18 03:49 AM
2

Men want more sexual power. Women want more power. This solves the problem. Men's chaotic nature is good for some jobs but only say 10% of jobs. Employers don't want alpha traits in a waiter. I think the ratio maybe closer to 20/80 but 50/50 is definitely not the best ratio. Just because men could get sex all the time does not mean they would not accomplish anything look at gay man.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 05:09 PM
1

Why does the approval of fellow men matter? Men are the enemy, the competition until they prove themselves. Women are by default friendly until they prove themselves otherwise(lesbians)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 04:16 PM
1

Society really throws a lot of roadblocks on people's way and it's hard to buck the status quo. It depends a lot if your intelligence and interests are in demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/18 10:34 PM
2

Intelligence has the potential to get you status and resources. Necessary but not sufficient condition. And most attractive women don't have to bank on potential. They can just wait and see ends up successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/18 07:55 PM
4

Fat/muscular think sumo guy high status to males; lower status to females. Singing guy high status to females; lower status to females
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/18 01:49 AM
0

Female sexuality is relative. They're attracted to relative traits like status and height. Male sexuality is more absolute. They have an ideal breast size, a certain hip/weight ratio, etc. So a female in the 1910's who was considered hot will likely be hot in 2018 not so for a male. Some males will be happy with just a vagina which you can have in the caveman days or today. Whereas in the caveman days you just needed a cave, now you need a mansion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 05:00 AM
2

If a man's commitment was valuable than things that show commitment should be valuable like someone who takes care of a cat, or someone who runs a blog, or someone who works at Walmart versus living off inheritance. Things that have no intrinsic value other than displaying commitment power.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/18 04:03 PM
0

I don't feel the anger towards women. They're the ones taking away the options and in some parts of the world aborting females...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/18 03:10 AM
2

Lots of men love fat chicks....as long as they have large breasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/18 03:04 AM
1

What about mania and hypersexuality? More women to men means increased likelihood of hypersexuality in women per man.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 10:36 PM
3

Even if 1 in a million women are not alpha chasers then the gender ratio matters. And it matters for things like prostitutes. Gender ratio drives cost up. It may not affect the alpha fucks market but it affects the beta bucks market.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/18 04:29 PM
0

Studies from less developed places won't necessarily be true for more developed places. And that's a gynocentric view of looking at things. Men were less violent with fewer women, but they were less happy. Men were more more violent with more women, but they were more happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/18 05:11 AM
1

A high female to male gender ratio has potential to be a women's paradise too as it gives them more societal power.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/18 05:45 PM
1

But female hotness is based on relative characteristics like height and status. So there could never be 100% hot men. Because not all men could be the tallest/have status.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/18 04:53 PM
1

Or we could alter the gender ratio and have a utopia of 90% women and 10% men. A larger population could be supported due to polygamy and shared living spaces. Women could have more power in all industries. Men would have more sexual demand for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/18 04:01 AM
1

What if you're rehearsing a scene for a porno?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 03:01 AM
2

How can the gender role of giving birth be dismantled?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 02:54 AM
3

This article had a good point but some of the stuff that was written that was hard to swallow. That's what I find in a lot of red pill/men's rights they make a good point and they shove in some stuff that makes you go woah too far. But feminists don't want to acknowledge the privilege of being able to be a sex object or baby making object two things that men are not really able to do. They always want to take about the hardships of giving birth rather than the monopoly of the womb.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/18 06:54 PM
1

I'll ask for help when the help I get is not shit. The only help a man can get is how to be a worker for corporations.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 02:42 AM
1

Everyone should have one unique name that no one else can have. So like Uhqrzxylbst. No one has the same name as anyone ever has.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 07:36 PM
1

--------What else can society do for you?---------- -Manipulate the gender ratio -Develop more technology to manipulate height -Decrease geographical barriers -Reduce economic disparity -Create a social safety net for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 03:49 PM
1

--------------Male commenting on breast reductions/hair styles being entitlement to women's bodies The question is why do they even care? ---------- Because naturally large breasts are rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 03:45 PM
3

Capitalists do have problems with the distribution of wealth because it's distributed to the rich based on corporate welfare and crony capitalism. The rich rig the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 01:55 AM
1

hypergamy states that in 100 years men will be happier because women will be better looking but women will be the same level of happiness because they only care about the attractiveness of the men relative to other men available.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 06:57 PM
1

When I see an overweight I check to see if she has large breasts then I find her attractive otherwise I skim over her.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/17 07:03 PM
1

They control the gender ratio via abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/17 06:05 PM
1

Females control the gender ratio so they should take responsibility for the effects of that gender ratio i.e. oversurplus of men, excess sexual desire, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/17 05:42 AM
2

The solution is to abort men until sexual equilibrium is reached. Women are valued over men in other areas too. There's a surplus of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/17 04:58 AM
3

Telling a girl you want to bang is only a viable strategy if you're more sexually valuable than her. Of course since that is the case this also makes you seem more sexually valuable(fake it until you make it). For the friendship route, you should request an ROI. "I've spent a lot of time talking to you about your problems, will you go check out a new club with me and serve as wingwoman?" Then she may say "I thought you liked listening to my problems." Then you're kind of screwed because there sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/17 06:43 PM
1

Women can take the gender roles of labor object but men can't take the roles of birthing and sex object(at least at this gender ratio and homosexuality ratio). Men have a size and fitness advantage too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/17 05:38 AM
2

Then women should find muscles like back and legs more attractive and not biceps as that has more to do with overall body strength.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 08:32 PM
3

And there tons of feature males who only care about one feature. Like breast size(big one), face, legs, butt. So a woman only has to be great in one category for a certain subset of males.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 08:17 PM
1

Not more demeaning than retail
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 07:02 PM
1

Female promiscuity does not hurt men male promiscuity hurts men
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/17 07:01 PM
0

Because that effort will lead to scientific advancement although empty complaining does not lead to scientific advancement.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/17 02:44 AM
2

Maybe we should be challenging perceptions on what can't be changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 09:19 PM
7

Lifting weights only make women attractive to a subset of men. Higher bodyfat is a secondary sex characteristic and lifting can reduce breast size. It also makes implants look less good as fat helps the implants blend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 03:43 PM
1

No female sexuality is genocide. It's exclusionary. Male sexuality is inclusionary. Sometimes to a fault(pedophilia, bestiality, etc.)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/17 05:12 AM
1

Men are objectified as labor. It's only through status that the objectification is escaped. Grocery clerks are seen as disposable utilities, ceo's are seens as people. In porn, lower men are disposable penises. The producers can goof off however they want. Women can be objectified as sex or labor and they can also attain status to escape the objectified status.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 12:57 AM
1

Women are objectified as sex, and nurture objects Men are objectified as labor utilities But there's some crossover too. There's some crossover but in porn men are objectified for their labor and ability to perform. In jobs women are objectified for their ability to nurture.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 11:51 PM
1

You don't look like you have a chad face from the side...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 03:22 PM
1

I go for any fat girl that has large breasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 06:28 PM
1

As long as the fat girls have large breasts and aren't morbidly obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:09 AM
1

I'd choose to be a man and for everyone else to be a woman. The man bad thing about being a man is the existence of other man. I'd choose to be a woman if everyone else was a man. Between 50% male-99.99999...% male is where it gets a little hazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 04:14 AM
1

It's not benevolent sexism that preferential treatment is given to women. Benevolent sexism is coddling women because we view them as weak. Rather women get preferential treatment because they are seen as more valuable and men are seen as disposable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 01:05 AM
2

I'm a man and would rather be a prostitute than work retail. Just because of less hours. 1 per day is better than 8 hours regardless of what it is... I would rather eat shit for an hour per day than most jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 01:55 AM
1

The solution to all "male disposability" problems is to increase ratio of females to males until males are no longer disposable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 01:43 AM
3

Men AND Women are the problem.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 03:49 AM
1

No it's not benevolent sexism because benevolent sexism is helping women because you believe they are weak. They used to help women in hopes of female attention. And I find holding doors open is a gender neutral thing. Both Women and men hold doors open for each other all the time. But a man doing it for a woman may do it with more flourish.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 01:58 PM
2

Men compete with each other because of hypergamy. Men have to portray themselves as strong to sell themselves to women. I disagree that real men are portrayed as being after sex at all times. It's okay for men to pursue status over sex. Men being unsuitable parents is probably due to the partriarchy wanting women to be baby objects and men to be labor objects. A man could easily take interest in feminine interests if he just says he doesn't give a fuck. Just say, "I like My Little Pony, what the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 01:58 AM
3

Then why the is male homosexuality vilified but female homosexuality praised. Female homosexuality is detrimental to male sexual strategy but does grant a woman agency. So why do women have more agency in regards to homosexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 01:44 AM
2

Male sexuality is like Jesus. It wants to love everyone. Even if it's not attracted to you it still wants you to experience the joys of it's penis. And it it's not attracted to you it's willing to negotiate with you and tell you how to become more attractive. Sometimes though it's attracted to things it probably shouldn't like babies and animals. Female sexuality is like hitler. Mass genocide of any genes that it deems unfit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 12:19 AM
3

A reason why women may prefer vicious men over virtuous men is because of male disposability. Due to hypoagency, women get to enjoy the rewards with none of the risks of the vicious men. If the vicious man fails they just find another one. A vicious is like a high risk investment that a woman has no penalty if it fails. Whereas a virtuous man is a low risk investment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 03:54 AM
2

Emphasis should be placed on refusing to bow to anyone. Not women. Not men. Not MGTOW.
/r/MGTOW02/09/17 05:35 AM
3

I'm attracted to fat girls as long as they have large breasts.
/r/MGTOW02/09/17 05:31 AM
2

I like the mantra "be willing to say no". Say no to societal expectations that you receive from women AND men (and MGTOW)
/r/MGTOW02/09/17 05:29 AM
1

Well if girlfriends are prizes than shouldn't male-male friendships be prizes as well. Then it wouldn't be sexism, it'd just be the way men view relationships. And I think men do view male-male friendships as prizes to help boost their status.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 04:55 AM
1

Don't feminists acknowledge that following their principles isn't the best for men to obtain sex that's why they say men aren't entitled to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 01:42 PM
2

Because manosphere tends to be as gynocentric as society as whole. And manosphere uses shaming language without hesitation-beta bux, white knights, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:02 PM
1

That if you want to go your own way you have to go your own way not only of female expectations but male and possibly other expectations as well.
/r/MGTOW26/08/17 09:30 PM
1

It's men who provide those police and courts to women. It's men who predominantly make up those police and courts. It's men choosing to find their sex and baby making objects as a higher priority than their labor objects. Many corporations have men sweat to pay their bills.
/r/MGTOW26/08/17 09:28 PM
1

The entire economic system is men at the top fucking over men at the bottom. There's no social safety net for men. The main social net for men is work rehabilation which is mainly just finding a way to efficiently extract labors from men.
/r/MGTOW26/08/17 09:27 PM
1

Because the anti-male stuff they have is wrong?
/r/MGTOW26/08/17 07:36 PM
1

A polyamorous Chad fucks over men unless the women he dates are equally polyamorous.
/r/MGTOW26/08/17 07:29 PM
1

Well one thing women could do is stop having so many male children unless they have a reasonable expectation that the male child will do well in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 04:03 AM
5

Men don't want to help other men. Men trade with other men. And there are willing beta men who accept the conditions. One solution is changing the gender ratio through sex selective abortions to increase the number of females. The supply of men is too great. 90% of what both feminism and manosphere complains about is due to oversupply of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 12:48 AM
3

Yeah but the sexy Halloween costume isn't because they're actually portraying the job. A sexy nurse isn't portraying an actual nurse it's portraying a nurse who has to heal a patient sexually not to do paperwork. Sexy secretary is basically symbolizing a prostitute who's only there to have sex with the boss. A sexy nun is another sexual fantasy(being sexually desirable that you break the marriage to god). So these jobs aren't Halloween costumes because there jobs are desirable they are Halloween…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 07:43 PM
1

My point is, is that you have the knowledge you should be able to get hired. Barriers to entry like expensive degrees create opportunities for things like sexism to occur. Rather than attacking the sexism we should attack the barriers to entry which would help everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 07:19 PM
1

So even if the most sexist policies blocked you from getting a math degree you still could have learned the math concepts. The degree being a rent seeking barrier to entry shouldn't be there. This is what we should be trying to tear down. More things should work like the actuarial exams and a computer cant (mostly) be sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 05:43 PM
2

Was there anything during your math degree that you couldn't have learned on your own?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 05:09 PM
1

I was trying to think of a celebrity non-pornstar example.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 03:16 PM
2

There's a difference between with fat with small breasts and fat with large breasts. Angry at fat with small breasts like Lena Dunham. Sexual attracted to fat with large breasts. Kat Dennings. And the girls wouldn't necessarily be more attractive with losing weight look at Jennifer Connelly and Alison Brie who lost weight and became less curvy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 01:40 PM
1

Not if they have large breasts.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 01:37 PM
3

They tend to select women that they would enjoy being friends with rather than women that you are attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 03:37 PM
1

Not all regions are the same. In competitive academia and competitive corporate environment and places like new York and LA there may be more patriarchal basis as they are more career driven. So certain places and cultures may very well be heavily patriarchal but average mainstream America is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/17 02:34 PM
1

2 and 8 have large enough breasts though to compensate for their fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:16 AM
2

If Google has diversity in its hiring why can't it promote diversity in its search results? It never points to minor sites anymore even when more relevant to majority sites. Seems hypocritical to promote diversity within the company when they control the diversity of information and the information they provide is homogeneous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 12:13 AM
5

Here's a business case for diversity: If an individual is undervalued. For example, someone in a wheelchair may be discriminated for his appearance but may be a damn fine computer programmer. The "diamonds in the rough." The bad news bears. Moneyball. How about some diversity in the search results rather than just promoting the same top authority sites while you're at it? Why is google promoting diversity in hiring if not diversity in search results?
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 04:53 AM
5

People are inherently diverse unless they are clones.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 03:26 AM
1

I disagree. A hypergamous woman will stay with a high status male and be faithful to him even if he is not faithful back. Think a female who says "I don't care if he cheats as long as he doesn't get caught." It is not true monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 04:41 AM
1

"Why would killing boys and men be necessary to overturn it? "<-it isn't necessary but it would be one way to do it. And aborting male fetuses would be a human way. "Right, which is why feminism and other movements have taken or demanded power instead of "asking" for it. "<-When has feminism taken power? Demanding power is a more aggressive way of asking for it. "Right, because [loss of male rights] doesn't exist."<-The attention to feminist rights has been at the expense of attention to men's r…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 04:38 AM
6

Women lie up->High heels. Clothing that enhances their appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 04:11 AM
1

"Being against a male centered and male controlled power structure is not the same as wanting men to cease to exist. " <-The only to destroy a power structure is to overturn it. You don't ask the power structure for rights and privileges over other disadvantaged classes("low status men"). "What rights have men lost because of feminism?" <-I'm not prepared to answer and defend that answer. That's a lot of research of involved. "That's like saying slave holders are responsible for freeing the slav…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 03:53 AM
1

Well if a guys voice makes him money it increases the SMV. Annoying high pitched voices can make money on broadway think Andrew Runnels.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 12:41 AM
1

Alter the male female ratio in the favor of females with sex selective abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 12:28 AM
1

I'd love to see Donald Trump take a low status male under his wing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 11:47 PM
0

No one can deny that the world is patriarchial but there are many regions that are matriarical like suburbia.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 03:19 PM
16

Society deems fine that it's okay to tell low status males that their desire for sex is something that needs fixing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 02:58 PM
2

Most men can barely make enough to pay rent. Most men don't get those things in the jobs they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/17 12:41 AM
1

There is a patriarchy but it exists to support elite men and most women over bottom men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 07:41 PM
1

But it's still the "patriarchy" that allows women to do those things(get an education and working). Females asked for those things from the patriarchy and were granted them. It's still not women in the very top positions. Women don't have to kill all men. Just enough of them to get the voting balance and to have the numbers game over them. Balancing the gender ratio is good for men too as it balances the SMP. Giving men more sexual power and women more political seems good to a lot involved. May…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 07:31 PM
8

If feminists really wanted to destroy the patriarchy they would start aborting the male fetuses. 99% of what feminists want is an attack against the bottom men not against the top men. Feminists want the patriarchy to protect them from the bottom men and to get privileges over the bottom men Patriarchy is better for women then men. Being a sex and baby making object is better than being a labor object. Nothing more dehumanizing than monotonous work. People only care about top men but care about …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 07:09 PM
1

A woman being overweight is relative to her breast size rather than her frame. The larger her breasts the heavier she can get away with.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 04:38 AM
3

Most men do not find fat women with small breasts attractive. Large breasts is another story.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 04:36 AM
1

Why does it have a threat of violence? Why can't we just acknowledge that the world would be better with more women than men. Reduces complaints about excess male demand and male complaints about not enough female supply. Not a lot of jobs are "male" jobs. Most don't want male characteristics, people who reinvent the wheel. Most in the service industry would rather have female workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 12:06 AM
0

Snow White in the seven dwarfs. One prince gets the girl and the other dwarves are SOL. In the movie Sydney White, Snow White at least provides for her dwarves.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:48 AM
2

And if you have large breasts you can be fat and still be very attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 10:01 PM
2

There's enough entitlement in the world to go around. Why not work to make things better for everyone rather than telling people that the way the see the world is wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 10:08 PM
1

Well offense is taken not given. I can't fix how other people will feel. If other people take offense to what I say then I adjust my verbage. How can anyone possible determine how someone else will feel about various statements? It's up to individuals themselves to determine if they are offended by something not to other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 08:09 PM
1

Well if only flowers were ever said to be pink and not anything else. Only masculinity is considered toxic and never femininity or toxic androgeny(?).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 08:04 PM
1

Hypergamy and monogamy differ in that fidelity has nothing to do with status. A hypergamous woman may claim to care about monogamy but will only care if he cheats if he gets caught or if he spends money on his mistress. A Monogamous woman will care if a man cheats even if a man does not expend a significant amount of resources on his mistress or damage the woman's reputation. A monogamous woman will still look for the best deal possible and it may still be higher than her but a monogamous woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/17 02:41 PM
1

There are some males who show agency and personality in open but usually they are also the producers of the scene so they can get away with it. So again objectification is linked to status and agency must be taken not given.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 10:22 PM
1

Trp isn't really analyzing all women though even if they apply their findings to all women. They are mainly studying the behavior of women who use dating sites and go to events that allow socializing with strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 08:27 PM
1

I read Kant a little bit and it women can't truly consent to being "sex objects" because of lack of options and thus it not being true consent. Most people don't want to do their jobs. In dance, most people want to be objectified group dancers, they want to be the solo dancers with agency, but they have to be group dancers to further their career. Or the objectified ensemble versus a principle with agency in theatre.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 02:57 PM
3

The patriarchy only favors top men. Feminists don't even want to demish the patriarchy. They want to take the patriarchy to give them power over lower status men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/17 04:24 AM
-1

Men do feel entitled to sex. They do not feel the need to force it on someone without their consent. But they feel entitled that their should be someone out there who wants to have sex with them that they are attracted to. Now what if a man's rights group is making that girl serve in prison. What if a man's right group is decreasing male disposability without countermeasures to increase sexual competition. Now a man's rights group is starting to infringe upon the degree to which most men feel en…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:02 PM
0

I agree that the phrase is messed up. Both men and women feel entitled to sex. Entitlement is not evil. But the issue is that for example if men are not explicitly disposed of then they will be implicitly be disposed via involuntary celibacy. Female infanticide occurs when the society does not care about male access to sex and males are expected to go celibate. My point is both feminism and men's rights measures decrease male access to sex.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:39 PM
-1

Because the men's rights issues of increased prison time for women would reduce male access to sex. It would remove the right of men to choose to have sex with those women.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:33 PM
-2

Okay using the woman in prison issue. Men's rights wants tougher sentences for women which removes a man's ability to have sex with them except the guards and any homo or bi women. So it's not even a case of consent of a person I have to get the government's consent too.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:16 PM
0

Lots of people are entitled but it's not a gendered thing and entitlement is not an evil feeling. Humans feel entitled to all sorts of things.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:11 PM
-7

You implicitly believe that everyone is entitled to the right to not have sex. To refuse sex. That the entitlement to not have sex trumps the entitlement to have sex. But you need not trample on the rights of people to not have sex if you manipulate the market forces to create more favorable social conditions.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 02:22 PM
-6

Not everyone will agree on what should be a men's rights issue and how those rights should be negotiated for.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 02:07 PM
-9

I suppose I did do some shaming by comparing the Men's Rights View to feminism. The purpose is to lampshade the matter that a lot of Men's Rights Issue will reduce male access to sex which means that Men's Rights doesn't care about Men's "Right" to Sex or Right to a favorable Sexual Marketplace. So Men's Rights Movement doesn't view men as being "Entitled" to Sex. Which makes it like feminism in that regard.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 02:04 PM
-9

Millions of sperm die every day. Millions of cells die every day. It's about killing earlier stages of life versus later stages. It's not just a sex issue, it's male roles in society as well.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 02:01 PM
1

A lot of those men were not tall and none had really great physiques. Although some like John Wayne, Gregory Peck, and Sean Connery could be assumed to be on the list because they had great voices and were tall. What's surprising is there's no disposable males on that list. Action stars like Clint Eastwood, Charles Bronson, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, etc. Although maybe James Dean could be considered a male disposability icon(so far no one has listed a male disposability icon). Sean Conne…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 03:39 PM
1

A feminist may say "because men feel entitled to sex. If they aren't getting it from the outside world they should get the sex they are owed from their mother and sister. If the wife isn't providing the sex they should get it from the daughter." Also men like fantasies with low cost to sex like pizza boys and delivery men getting it. Nothing is lower status than a son to his mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 03:34 PM
1

But the principle is that you should never give commitment away for free not even to your mother. Mothers are always trying to get free commitment from their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/17 03:13 PM
1

Women are willing to be monogamous with a top tier man even if he is not (see: The Sopronaos, Mad Men). The question is whether the woman enforces the man to be monogamous. This lowers a woman's options.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 03:16 AM
1

The difference between hypergamy and monogamy in a female is generally whether she'll require monogamy from the male
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 11:07 PM
0

A hypergamous female would want the highest status man regardless of whether he was faithful or not. A monogamous female would want the highest status man who was monogamous. Since a male above her in the dating pool would be tempted to trade up or just add some variety. A monogamous female cannot usually date above or at least date below what a hypergamous female would.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 09:42 PM
0

I think hypergamy is overrepresented. Most females do date up but things like branch swinging don't really take place as much as said. It's mainly that hypergamous females are more likely to be single as wanting to date up and looking for branches to swing on keeps you on the marketplace longer. Not all females are hypergamous. Some are monogamous, a monogamous female values fedility. A hypergamous female will not care about infidelity as long as he doesn't get caught or as long as he's honest a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 09:03 PM
1

The government sees people as property. Corporations see people as property. Why don't we start with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 02:54 PM
1

Well you know how some women just care if a man cheats if he gets caught(and especially if he dates down) whereas other women actually care about the act of cheating itself. The latter women would be example of women valuing monogamy over status. These women would instantly dump a man if he cheats. Not give her time to reflect on what happened. Not ask him "Did it mean anything?" Dump him and move on. These are the monogamous women. Surely you know one woman like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 01:51 PM
1

Why is it assumed the men have to suffer the burden of sexual dimorphism? It's partially due to the gender ratio, there's just not enough females relative to males. A 50/50 gender ratio(actually tilted so it's more a sausage fest) is mother nature's version of sexism. Fix the economy. And find a way to grow taller, there is a way. There's just not enough resources devoted to it or a lot of science to that matter. And apparently facial aesthetics matter for men too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 05:13 AM
1

I know for sure that women who are only attracted to the top 20% would be overrepresented in the single dating pool because all the women who were monogamous females(females who valued a committed relationship over status) would be taken already. I can't actually prove they exist other than anecdotal evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:36 AM
2

NAWALT, it's just that single women are very likely to be like that. Women who aren't attracted to just the top 20% are just not very likely to be single. If more women were thrown in the pool there would be more women who weren't just "chasing chad". And not every woman's 20% is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 02:01 PM
1

Like most sales jobs it depends on your sales skills. You have to build a clientele and market.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 04:58 AM
0

Most women don't "need" sex as much as men. To women sex is like ice cream nice to have but some can go without. To men sex is like oxygen they can't go without. And who's to say there's not an equilibrium that makes both sides happy. Women complain about excessive male demand, if that was subsidized due to an increase in supply then women would be happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 04:55 AM
1

I feel bad because it's a problem that doesn't have to be there. All you have to do is increase the number of women relative to men. It's like the economic system, everyone is hurt by a lower GDP and the stifled scientific advancement and progress created by a system of rent seeking but those in power have little incentive to change. We know that there's too many men in the world relative to the women that's why male disposability is so high. So isn't it more humane to find a way to dispose of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 03:02 PM
1

If men have power over women on a societal level than they have power over other men and that's bad for the men on the bottom. As shown in todays society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 02:54 PM
1

Start aborting their male children to fix the gender ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/17 03:30 AM
-5

So sexual entitlement is about bullying and picking on the lower status people? You can have entitlement and have plenty of something.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 01:43 PM
0

If you're the last man on earth are you entitled to sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 01:41 PM
-3

Well, originally men didn't want women to interact with them via the right to vote. Should the desire for male politics to be left alone have trumped female wishes to interact? Morality is a construct. Neither men or women are entitled to interact or not interact it should be a negotiation. Neither side should be "entitled" to certain things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 01:41 PM
-1

You just proved the point. You say women aren't entitled to sex because they are already swimming in it. Just because you're swimming in something doesn't mean you aren't entitled to it. You breathe air, can't you be entitled it? Women are taught that they are entitled to sex but they have to work to earn commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/17 01:38 PM
3

The Sexual Market Place is at an equilibrium it's just an equilibrium that makes things shitty for men. The only ways to do are increase the supply of women, find cheap substitutes, or try to reduce the demand from men.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/17 04:45 AM
3

For the children.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 09:27 PM
0

It's not just about the number of fish, it's about the number of fisherman.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:11 PM
1

I meant to say malevolent but I guess benevolent works too. "I'm doing this for your own good." Which I've had experience from a lot of males too as well.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:57 PM
2

There's four main archetypes that men are attracted. Large Breasts - Fitness girls - Legs - Face asthetics
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 01:44 AM
1

Because men want polygyny if they were on top. Men don't resent hypergamy so much as that they are not on the top of the pyramid. Red pill says to embrace hypergamy and become the ones at the top. And sometimes I think a lot of men don't even want sex but just want an excuse to oppress women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 03:20 AM
5

See the thing is men in prison and women getting lighter sentences is good for the men that it doesn't happen to. Lock up the competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 04:34 AM
4

So a penis is only valuable to the man who owns it. A man's penis is like a penny, valuable to some but to most is overlooked.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 01:26 AM
1

Why focus on economic and political equality for females when the whole system is so corrupt and broken for both genders on fundamental levels? A rising tide raises all ships. And the government and economy is one flat ass ocean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 12:43 AM
1

Well the winners of society don't tend to resort to violence unless it's to repress the losers. Although there are some "winners" who are serial killers. Create more winners and there's less "outbursts" from the losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 12:54 AM
1

Why do people think mental health services are a magic pill? If you're unhappy for a good reason then how are mental services going to help? Mental health services should be for people who have everything but still aren't happy or for people who's neuroses are stopping them from achieving the things they need to obtain success(I can't go outside to improve my quality of life). Mental health services should not be about accepting a shitty QOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 07:27 PM
1

The global economy seems to think it's entitled to wage slaves without providing people of a social safety net of shelter so that people have the option not to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 04:42 AM
2

I would be willing to trade off political power for increase competition in the sexual marketplace. It's not like men have problems exploiting other men and always look out for male best interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 04:40 AM
1

Samantha Anderson weighs 219lbs. 300lbs that's well above the attractive BBW range.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 10:26 PM
2

Male sexual entitlement is entitlement of men to have sex from women. Feminists said it was responsible for the Elliot rodger killing spree although his actions didn't correspond to someone who wanted sex at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 10:17 PM
3

Increasing female birth ratio and reducing male birth ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 08:30 PM
2

Well a printer has to do things that make sense but a human(men and women) doesn't...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 08:17 PM
0

Desire can be negotiated. Donald Trump became a lot more desirable after he became president. A man can hand a woman his business card that says CEO and he becomes a lot more desirable. Women are only the gatekeepers of sex because of gender ratios if there was only one man on earth than the man would be the gatekeeper of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 08:13 PM
4

Sex is only not frowned upon if a female is involved. Male-male sex. Male masturbation are all frowned upon. Female-female. Female-male. And female masturbation are all accepted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 07:55 PM
4

Increasing availability of cheap substitutes for sex and human companionship Legalizing Prostitution and reducing the stigma associated with prostitution Increasing the female to male ratio They are hard but that's not to say there's not other easier solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/17 07:54 PM
1

It's still important to the men who meet the standards. Not all women are hypergamous, some women are monogamous. It's just that hypergamous women are overrepresented as they're more likely to be single due to branch swinging and having higher standards. A hypergamous female spends a lot more time on the sexual marketplace than a monogamous female so that gives the perception that there's not that many monogamous females. There are monogamous females it's just they are all taken. A monogamous fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 09:54 PM
1

Supply/demand economics. Lowers the demand for women. A male in the closet for example has a need for a woman to hide the fact that he's in the closet.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 09:48 PM
0

I would sleep with a woman with naturally breasts or who had large implants(at least G cup) who had cerebal palsy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 09:16 PM
1

If a man hates a gay man it's toxic masculinity because gay men are beneficial to straight man. A gay man on the closet may take someone like Kelly Preston out of the SMP. Toxic masculinity is socially constructed attitudes that are harmful to men. Homosexual men are good for heterosexual men on the sexual market place. Even if the socially constructed attitude makes men just tolerant of homosexual men than that is harmful to heterosexual. Homosexual man should be subsidized for the positive ext…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 09:13 PM
1

You should because gay men are good for you on the sexual market place because they reduce the demand for women on the sexual market place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 09:07 PM
1

And that is the truth. Male disposability is good as long as it happens to me as it decrease the supply of men and men are oversupplied.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:42 PM
0

No unfortunately they don't. 99% of the population demands to not be involved in an economic system that only works for a few people on top and nothing happens.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:56 AM
1

So if you have different ideas and opinions you're trolling?
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:56 AM
1

Men women will never have the same rights as women as long as the supply of women is so much less than the demand. Males are only disposable as their are too many of them. Females are privileged due to the their shortage. Equal treatment under the law should not be the main goal. You should strive never to get in a situation involving the law.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:42 AM
1

Men wouldn't need to be chained as they would no longer be disposable. Men are only disposable because the supply for them is way greater than the demand. Men would too valuable to chain.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 08:25 PM
1

I don't see how it's crazy to try to use science and technology to try to make a better world for men and women alike.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:15 PM
1

There's not enough more women than men increasing male disposability and reducing male access to sex which increases male frustration/violence as well as other things. I've read articles that say that this encourages men to make more commitment and drives men to make more scientific advancement. But this again drives forth the attitude that men have to suffer to drive forth the advancement of society when women are capable of advancing society too. All you need for evolution is genetic mutations…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 01:50 PM
1

I am not trolling. I absolutely believe that the world be better if the gender ratio was (majorly) tilted towards women. I just recognize that it would require a ton of research, effort, and proposals to achieve this in an ethical way. It is a strawman argument to attack the ability to enforce the gender ratio as that was not my argument I was advocating the change in the gender ratio itself. There are of ideals thrown out by feminism and men's rights that may not be enforceable like attempting …
/r/MensRights11/06/17 04:02 AM
0

You're right. I shouldn't have used hypergamy as there is hyperbole involved and it demonizes women. More accurately men subjugate women and other men to increase their access to sex. For one there could be scientific funding for ways to select the gender of the child and provide benefits for having female children.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 02:19 AM
-5

That's a straw man argument basically. First thing, would be to come up with a consensus that the gender ratio causes a lot of problems and then work for a solution. It would take a ton of research to come up a proposal to change the gender ratio. But the most "humane" way is to encourage people start producing more girls than boys.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 11:50 PM
0

I'd rather try to convince people that this is a worthwhile than spending the rest of my life trying to make this happen you know... Probably involves the creation of more girls.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 09:32 PM
1

Masculinity is only toxic when a beta tries to act like an alpha. Beta's shouldn't want alpha things and should be punished for it. Beta's should accept that in the sexual market place women and alpha's are the winners and any attempt by a beta to display their sexual desire such as looking at a woman is toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 03:40 AM
1

This doesn't account that there's basically at least four different kinds of women that people find hot. Breasts, Face, Legs, fitness, etc. So a 10 to one kind of guy may be lower to another.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 12:11 AM
1

What about? Men deserve enough women relative to men such that there exists women who want to have sex with them. I'm convinced God is a woman for having a 50/50 gender ratio.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/17 09:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter