TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Darkling5499 Archive

View 9 posts and 930 comments by Darkling5499 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Without looking into it, and having no horse in that race (im not from the UK), i see a LOT of UK commentators who are against open door immigration policies labeled as "racist".
/r/MensRights31/03/23 08:42 PM
5

I hate Dr. Squatch because they're just a dropshipper setup that made it to the big time. You can literally buy an entire log of their soap (pre-sliced) without the logo from alibaba for the price of a single bar from Dr. Squatch.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 12:09 PM
10

Petty and short sighted, i think. Not necessarily evil. if this was as recent as even 10 years ago, i'd believe you. but nowadays? there's literally no way she didn't know EXACTLY what she was doing. she got upset that some guy wouldn't talk to her because he's an adult and she's a minor, and wanted to ruin his life as payback for the "insult".
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:41 PM
24

the USWNT was beat by a U-15 boys team. in the USWNT's defense, it was one of the best teams, and these are the players who (if they keep playing soccer) can go pro. the olympic women's hockey team was beaten in a similar fashion.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:04 AM
47

(despite the evidence) and despite the fact that she, under oath, admitted she made it all up just to boost her career.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 04:30 PM
8

too bad he supports a china-like social credit system and a UBI system, among other crazy stuff.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 02:53 PM
2

i experienced the wikiwars surrounding the men's rights article and gamergate article. it's exactly how powereditors work.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 10:33 AM
-64

both of you are talking like he actually has a social life. if he's that dedicated to the wiki, there's a 100% chance he's one of the ones that sits on his pet articles, instantly removing any edits he doesn't agree with (regardless of correctness). he then gets them (the other editor) removed / banned from the article (if not wikipedia entirely) by sourcing obscure rules that may or may not actually apply to the situtation, but because WP is VERY gatekept by a complex and arcane rulebook, 99% o…
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:05 AM
29

meh, even 2 years ago 95% of the training was about how men are rapists in waiting. the last 5% was just ambiguous.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:04 AM
15

This is female chauvinism, not feminism. no, it's feminism. with nothing to actually fight for for over 30 years, it's become a toxic, hateful shell of what it used to be. people can try to no true scotsman it all they want, but this story is modern feminism 100%.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 11:52 PM
4

only 2 years for an act that could have ruined this man's entire life, nevermind the jailtime he would have served, is absolutely laughable. i mean, at least she got SOMETHING (which is rare enough as it is), but 2 years (she'll be out in 1) is just insulting.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:16 PM
1

except google + apple block the alternative sites. gab's off the google store and apple store, and it's only a matter of time before Minds is off both as well (if they even have an app).
/r/MensRights30/08/17 07:16 AM
1

cumberbritches is such low hanging fruit that for about a year even TumblrInAction banned posting stuff featuring her. she is a living, breathing stereotype of everything wrong with modern feminism.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:42 AM
9

while i can probably (easily) find holes in something done by CNN, i do appreciate the links :) vastly better argument than the usual "PATRIARCHY WHITE MALE REEEEEEE" i usually get
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:55 AM
27

i replied before your edit. 1st link: says exactly you said wasn't the case: "Women of child-bearing age may prefer jobs with a lower wage but with employer-paid parental leave, sick leave and child care to jobs with a higher wage but without such benefits". and it also drew heavily from a survey that's over 25 years old. 2nd link: not going to read an entire congressional study, but the fact that it appears to be done purely to prove a predetermined point (going by page 3) makes me doubt it adh…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:28 AM
40

the point is the wage gap is because of discrimination. it's been thoroughly debunked and has nothing to do with discrimination of any kind. the whole rallying cry is that they are paid less due to gender, not because they decided to be a preschool teacher instead of a sysadmin.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:14 AM
59

the wage gap has been utterly destroyed multiple times?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:07 AM
68

and it never will. every time it gets disproven, they just move the goalposts and start all over.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:14 AM
2

but that statement is itself an absolute...
/r/MensRights28/02/17 02:13 AM
25

ah yes, that explains why organizations such as NOW do everything in their power to prevent things like lifelong alimony from being removed, and why they send death threats to the people running men's shelters until they're forced to close.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:15 AM
-16

feminist men's rights activist pick one, the first does everything in it's power to stop the second. downvoted for facts now wewlads
/r/MensRights25/01/17 08:33 AM
9

Feminists want the ability to point to a man, say the words "He Raped Me !" and destroy his life. implying they don't already have that power.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 06:10 PM
2

You need to pass this firearms course....well we use "pass" lightly its really up for debate. if you can't pass a basic marksmanship course with a red dot sight that basically aims itself, something is wrong.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:13 AM
-2

Forced labor is slavery i wouldn't call it SLAVERY, or even indentured servitude (since you ARE getting paid, plus benefits).
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:11 AM
94

i find it funny that they think getting drafted = front lines. we all know that they'll be put into admin / noncombat positions (since they can't pass the combat tests without being given special exemptions, with rare exception), then johnny finance will be given a gun and thrown to the front lines.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:10 AM
1

i'm going to find this business. i'm going to find it, apply for a job, and when i don't get hired, i'll bring them to court so fast their heads will spin.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 11:06 PM
23

she's now also claiming domestic violence. she'll get whatever she wants
/r/MensRights28/05/16 12:23 PM
125

"FEMINISM INCLUDES MENS ISSUES TOO!!" really? name the last feminist with any real power or influence who has actually tried to deal with issues like male suicide and homelessness, and not just laugh at the thought? "umm.. READ THE DICTIONARY FEMINISM IS ABOUT EQUALITY!!"
/r/MensRights13/04/16 08:11 PM
11

the government that has a female MP that openly mocks the idea of any male-related issues? yeah, i see this gaining TONS of traction there /s
/r/MensRights09/04/16 02:09 PM
2

he submitted them as evidence when he sued the school.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:34 PM
16

BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAno.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:36 PM
1

because the punishment isn't imprisonment, i guess.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 07:27 PM
27

Emma Sulkowicz. Claimed Paul Nungesser raped her, university cleared him (surprisingly). Went around carrying a matress as a performance piece, saying she would do so until he was removed from the college, going as far as carrying it onto the stage when receiving her diploma. turns out, not only did he not rape her, but texts / facebook messages sent by Sulkowitz to Nungesser showed the sex was consentual, and that she was just upset that he had moved on. edit // she also had a bunch of her frie…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 07:26 PM
28

double jeopardy only applies to government courts.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 04:04 PM
22

Our problem is that we have no data for that, because the majority of those false claims are not recorded as anything, and end up adding to the statistics of "non-convicted" rapist statistics adding to statistics involves going to court. since a lot of the false accusers lately (see: Jackie, mattress girl, etc) seem to just tell their story to the public and never go to the police / cooperate with police, the "case" stops there. they're allowed to drag people thru the mud with minimal repercussi…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 04:04 PM
1

np links do nothing, btw. last announcement spez said he had no idea how people got the idea that using np links gave them any protection from brigading punishments.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 04:33 PM
2

her statement is that he's been raping / sexually assaulting her since she was 18, not just one time in 2016.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 09:14 PM
10

there's quite a few, here's the first one i found via a quick google: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2802370/kesha-swore-oath-2011-deposition-dr-luke-did-not-sexually-abuse-undercutting-rape-allegations-latest-lawsuit.html
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:11 PM
6

there's a difference between going around and telling people he raped you at the same time you want out of your contract, and telling a judge he didn't rape you while under oath.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:10 PM
19

she, under oath, admitted multiple times that he's never raped or sexually assaulted her.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:28 PM
2

there's a difference between having a few drinks and having sex, and being so drunk you can't stay awake and having sex.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 03:57 PM
9

she openly talks about it. she admits to having sex with a man so drunk he was coming in and out of consciousness.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 05:25 AM
5

Again? last time they tried NOW threw a massive tantrum and called everyone who supported ending lifetime alimony misogynists until they caved.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:20 AM
-1

or she was browbeat by a government who is doing everything they can to try and defend the fact that they're letting in hundreds of rapists.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:57 PM
8

worked well enough for ZQ
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:05 PM
14

i personally love when people use politics to grandstand and not actually do anything meaningful. i'm sure her constituents are super excited she's wasting time and money on a bill that has no chance of passing.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:49 AM
1

they also aren't the only crazies.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:16 AM
1

indeed. but it also can include a guy giving a speech about how the government is mind controlling us via flouride. my point was that tedx talks are hardly the paragon of intellectual discourse (same with TED talks) that people seem to think they are.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 01:56 AM
12

TEDx is the only thing more useless than a TED talk. literally ANYONE can give a TEDx talk. all you have to do is pay them $10k and they'll give you a platform. TED talks tend to be as factually accurate as a michael moore documentary.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:20 PM
9

honestly that's the best way to lie. convince yourself that it's not a lie.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:15 AM
1

wow that's awesome lol.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:26 AM
22

ID doesn't matter. she can have a fake ID.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 10:44 PM
1801

lol.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 10:44 PM
2

finland's got some weird ass laws. a lizard squad member was charged and convicted of over 100k counts of cybercrime, and not only was his 2 year sentence suspended, but he got a goverment job right after the trial was over.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:23 PM
2

adding a zero? the man would never make it out of prison.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:22 PM
10

DOA has been getting shit reviews shocker, considering the sources are all sex-negative puritans. Every DoA game has sold better in the west than it has in Japan.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 03:59 PM
52

that statement, ironically enough, is an absolute itself.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 05:34 PM
7

she represented New York CITY. she gave zero fucks about the rest of the state during her time as a senator for the state.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 12:32 AM
5

we need more dialogue to deal with problems that face both sexes not ignoring it banning useful discussion. indeed. the sad thing is, it's currently political suicide across the western world to dare challenge things like this. the minute you do, your face will be plastered on MSN, CNBC, CNN, etc with the title of "hates women".
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:05 PM
4

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf edit // there used to be a link on the sidebar with a point by point decimation of the study, didn't realize it was gone.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:03 PM
46

you're exactly right, actually. they also considered "attempted forced kissing" as sexual assault. that's right, not forced kissing, but merely attempting to kiss someone was considered sexual assault for that survey.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 05:05 AM
4

women earn more and make up for more than 51% of the votes in the US, yet somehow they're oppressed.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 10:45 PM
277

then there's also the fact that the 1 in 5 study was based around an internet survey sent via email to students of two relatively small colleges, and had zero follow up...
/r/MensRights14/11/15 10:43 PM
15

#MasculinitySoFragile that they get mad for getting suspended /s
/r/MensRights06/11/15 04:14 PM
1

So basically, the court made its decision in a vacuum completely removed from reality, both then and now as is the case with a lot of their decisions, sadly.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:37 PM
3

they're doing a pretty good job at it tbh. places like GitHub have taken on "codes of conduct" that basically say if someone disagrees with you, they're harassing you.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:40 PM
1

her entire campaign is basically "vote for me, i'm a woman!". not sure why her calling people sexist is a surprise to anyone.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:13 PM
1

there's been a few posts around here about how /r/relationships is kind and caring and doesn't care about your gender, when the sub clearly gives zero shits if you're a male in an abusive relationship.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:33 PM
3

pretty sure it's been a crime in the US for ages as well. you're either an accessory or conspiring with.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:18 PM
7

not sure what anyone was expecting from a post in /r/relationships.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:58 PM
1

something something war against women.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:44 AM
2

i wouldn't put any sub with takeittorcirclejerk as a mod on the front page.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 11:40 PM
1

She was also banned from having unsupervised contact with young boys for two years male perp gets banned from contact for life, if he even survives prison.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 06:41 PM
3

Sorry man but trials are public and the government is prohibited from telling the press what they can and can't write. Only way to get around that is secret trials. hence my second option: releasing both names. also, secret trials implies that people don't know they're going on, not that people don't know the defendant / accuser.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 02:03 AM
2

which, in my experience, makes it check out as a military poster. our graphic designers (yes, sadly, that's a military job that all branches have) are either absolutely amazing or downright terrible.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:46 PM
262

without reading the article, but simply responding to the Title's question: no. that was thoroughly proven during the fappening, where everyone and anyone who looked at the photos was labeled a gross creepy pervert. after reading the article: i'm kind of shocked that a publication that seems to use "white male" as a slur (with obligatory mentions to privilege and the patriarchy) would actually print this. at least the commenters are having none of it.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:44 PM
8

yes, because the next logical leap is instead of "slandering every defendent" we hold secret trials. not that the names of the defendants, like the accusers, are legally kept out of the press. currently, only the accuser's name is unavailable to the press. so rather than slander the accuser (as was done in the past [among other things], hence the laws), the press has taken to absolutely destroying anyone simply ACCUSED of a sexual crime. i'm still waiting for the "apology issue" from rolling sto…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:38 PM
16

i think his point was that the "trials" that those simply accused of rape is cruel and unusual in that as the accused, your name is dragged thru the mud by the press, and you will NEVER be clear of that connection. for the rest of your life, when someone googles your name, they'll find "rapist" (if you're lucky, they'll see "accused rapist").
/r/MensRights10/10/15 06:02 PM
9

i'm normally not a fan of "slippery slope" conjecture, but they're making it kind of hard to not assume they'll continue the pattern of redefining what abuse is to further enhance the agenda.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:20 PM
20

i mean, it's neither, but i've been seeing / hearing the "1 in 3" a lot recently. it seems like every few years they change the number (1 in 6, 1 in 5, 1 in 4, now 1 in 3).
/r/MensRights09/10/15 05:04 PM
6

Mathematics, the "M" in "STEM", is just a tool of the patriarchy and is inherently sexist!!!
/r/MensRights09/10/15 06:19 AM
2

what magical land do you live in where you don't need either? cuz my dream home is in an area where the temperature range is only 65-85 lol
/r/MensRights09/10/15 12:36 AM
1

i'm more worried about the fact that 2 of the women went to ranger school simply as a resume booster, and one will never see combat anyways. that's 2 slots that someone in an active combat role could have taken (and no, i don't consider military police an active combat role).
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:15 PM
2

This is about what serves the military's needs, not about the desires of the individuals. trust me, the military is fighting tooth and nail (and slowly losing) against PC culture. you can't do anything on a base that someone somewhere might deem offensive without looking over your shoulder first for THAT guy / girl. and i'm not talking about the "good ol boys" club breaking up and not being able to make sexist jokes. i'm talking about things like, say, GI Jane being shut off halfway thru because…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:13 PM
1

eh, women or not, sexual assault is still going to happen on subs / ships, sadly. now, if you're referencing having to add separate facilities (something that can not be done on a sub), that's a legitimate point.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:05 PM
1

probably average HEALTHY weight.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:04 PM
7

cleft lip / pallete have a long documented history of causing health issues. health issues surrounding circumcision have all been thoroughly debunked. the only reason to do them in todays day and age is comsetic / religious.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 03:49 AM
18

the sub isn't anti-circumcision. it's anti-circumcision at birth, when the child can not possibly consent.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 03:21 AM
39

that doesn't get you $4k/month in patreon donations.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 04:52 PM
2

how is this even a debate. a CRIME should be handled by those who specifically deal with CRIME.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:49 AM
2

i understand your point. there are those that call themselves feminists who do actually fight for equality. it's just that the only ones who get any press, have any political power, and actually DO a lot of things are what feminism has become. i'll revise my opinion on feminism once i see the "equality feminists" actually accomplish something in the US, like making selective service mandatory for women (or abolishing it altogether), getting rid of lifetime alimony (which MULTIPLE major, worldwid…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 07:12 PM
10

That's a fun idea that people like to push, but in reality most feminists are all about social, economic, and political equality. except it's not a "fun idea". it's being proven across the globe. look at any time a men's conference is going down. there's feminist protesters. look at the US political scene: they're further shoving the overwhelmingly debunked wage gap. look at the US / EU collegiate scene: they're pushing rape culture despite RAINN themselves saying that outside of prison, rape cu…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:52 PM
10

feminism hasn't been about equal rights in decades. in its current incarnation, large swaths of it border on being a hate group.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:19 PM
10

I think that only bringing the DV up once the divorce has started should be ruled inadmissible seriously. if you're halfway thru the trial and, when it looks like you're losing SOMEHOW, you go "oh yeah btw he beat me" you should automatically lose the case. full stop. because you're clearly lying to the court to get sympathy.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:18 PM
91

/r/relationships in a nutshell: person a: i hit my spouse with a frying pan after they pulled a knife on me person b: oh you poor woman you need to run to the cops right now and get that evil man locked up for life. be sure to be extra emotional when talking to the cops person a: i'm a guy, my wife tried to knife me... person b: you should be in jail you misogynist monster. the fact that you came to reddit crying about this tells me you need to man up and grow a pair. pussy.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 07:03 PM
4

does the law stipulate that it's rape (statuatory or otherwise), or just sexual assault? i'm curious if men can even be raped per Utah law now...
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:34 PM
8

was it over the age of consent where the sex took place? no? then she's a rapist in the eyes of the law. or would be, if she was a guy.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:24 PM
7

there are vanishingly few films about female serial killers that's because most women killers don't go about it in a physically violent way that's easily translated into a movie. they tend to do it in a less physical manner, like poison. it's much easier to make a movie about a serial killer if they went around stabbing people and leaving a lego in their mouth than it is to make a movie about a serial killer who just randomly poisons meals at the soup kitchen. the definition of what makes a kill…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 09:04 PM
8

wiki's been a lost cause for a while. paid moderators / admins openly shill and claim ownership (as in, "don't edit this article, it's mine" claiming) of articles, in clear violation of multiple wiki rules. but jimbo doesn't care, because wikipedia is a cash cow for him.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:47 AM
6

not only is coke still illegal, but it wasn't her first strike. it was her SEVENTH.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:43 AM
13

to clarify, he's being charged as an ADULT for having naked pics of a minor, himself. let that sink in. he's being charged (and therefor treated) as an adult, for having nude pictures of a minor: himself.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:58 AM
7

well guys, i'll see you all next week, finally gonna pull the trigger and book that ski trip in hell since it's clearly frozen over.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:02 AM
2

in finland you can be convicted of 157,000 counts of cybercrimes and get a 2 year suspended sentence and a gov't job.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 10:12 PM
400

What makes people think that doing this is okay. probably the complete and utter lack of any consequences for doing it, for starters.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:56 PM
1

thru the mail? not at all. if it's a package, ship it via cash a few towns over, or put it in a mailbox / communal mail box (like in an apartment building). as for the SWATting, it takes 30 seconds to make it look like the PC you're calling from is 4 states away, which is why it's so hard to prosecute: they can't find them.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:49 PM
1

edited my posts, but i was mistaken. i looked it up for a refresher and he pretended to have cancer, not be suicidal. still pretty fucked up though.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:09 PM
2

it didn't even "raise awareness". the SJW subs thought it was all hilarious cuz it somehow, in their eyes, put reddit in a bad light. you know, apparently, in their minds a community that tries to help a suicidal teenager and get him to not kill himself through his time with cancer is bad. adrian chen was their fucking hero.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:29 PM
7

His tone just seems to me that he feels he's obviously right when he's commenting on things. that's just it though. he usually IS right when he's commenting on something (i say usually even though i've yet to see a case where he was wrong). there's nothing wrong with acting like he does (in regards to being right) when you're always right.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 05:13 PM
3

there's a reason that quite a few subreddits don't allow gawker network links to be posted in their subreddits. chen also pretended to be a suicidal teenager with cancer, went to reddit, who welcomed him with open arms and tried to talk him out of it console him / being supportive of him / etc, and he laughed about it.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 05:11 PM
6

anytime someone says "starting a discussion" i immediately know they're full of shit.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:45 AM
7

former office drone, cubicle farm drone here. we had to wear dress pants, dress shirt (solid colors only, blue / black / grey / white), a tie (conservative, no ducks or anything), and nice shoes (khakis + polo shirts on friday though!!!). women could wear dresses, skirts below the knee, pants, blouses, dress shirts, non-open toe footwear. but yeah, dress codes are sexist against women.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:44 AM
6

lol. i'm on the list for posting: ༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ EVERYONE GET IN HERE! ༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º༼ ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽ºل͜º ༽
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:27 PM
13

i'm sure they'll be introduced to his lawyer soon enough.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:17 PM
1

not sure why we're arguing about tanks when the US military has said time and time again it doesn't want them, and it's pure politics forcing the pentagon to buy them.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:46 PM
2

it is going to take a horrific incident in which people die as a direct result of the actions of unqualified female firefighters for people to finally fight back against this. lol. the fire department will do everything it can to prevent the gender of the person who failed from being known. otherwise they're going to get sued and the union is going to have a field day saying the city / town is sexist / etc.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:43 PM
12

female and male are literally the only way to NOT risk being offensive. call her a "chick"? offended. "girl"? offended. "woman"? offended.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:54 PM
11

she may not NOW. but fuck her, ruin her financially for the foreseeable future. take every last dime she has now, force her to sell her shit within a month to pay off more of the debt, and take 50% of her paycheck until the balance is paid, with interest of course (like any other judgement).
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:52 PM
1

at least she isn't going to be on a sports illustrated cover.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:00 PM
1

look further down in this comment tree, you'll see it.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:49 PM
8

... no. it's a pretty common military term.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:57 PM
49

plural of dependapotomous. a combination of dependent and hippopotamus, made for their stereotypically large size and their herd travel habits.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 01:26 AM
7

here
/r/MensRights07/07/15 12:52 AM
73

surprised this isn't heavily, heavily downvoted. /r/military hates dependapotomi like her. edit // found the thread, it's being downvoted for the trash it is.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 12:14 AM
3

the inequality like letting someone get away with beating the crap out of a family member, then hitting the cop who came to break it up?
/r/MensRights06/07/15 01:18 AM
15

not to mention the fact that pricing based on gender is illegal in NYC.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 06:45 PM
40

good thing that's 100% illegal in NYC.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:24 PM
13

comments were looking good until i ran into the "but was it REALLY rape though?" comment (re: 15 year old male w/ 27 year old female). then i kept reading further and further down and got more and more dissapointed. so many instances of "how is that rape?" (re: drunk sex).
/r/MensRights15/06/15 02:13 PM
11

I consider myself a feminist in the sense that I think all people should have equal rights and opportunity, no matter their gender then you aren't a feminist. feminism hasn't been about equality for decades.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 04:54 PM
3

Polock here, we white as fuck.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:25 PM
1

like OH EM GEE don't you understand that #killallmen is just satire and ironic and funny?! like, get a sense of humor BRO. stop trying to #mansplain to me what #killallmen REALLY means. /s
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:24 PM
1

the whole situation is being investigated currently, no idea if she'll actually be charged with anything.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:23 PM
1

freedom of speech protects the unpopular opinion. as long as your words aren't inciting riots / lynch mobs, you should be able to say whatever you want. side note, i know the holocaust happened, and i think the deniers are fucking loony. but just because you're loony doesn't mean you don't have as much a right as everyone else to say what you think.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 07:22 PM
2

try living here :/ it's been a blue state for ages (outside of governor), yet outside of astronomical (and outright archaic) taxes / tax codes, it hasn't been that bad until ~4 years ago. our entire state's set of laws is, for the most part, stuck in the 1950s. it only just recently became legal to sell alcohol on sundays, and grocery stores can only sell beer, not liquor / win. the one thing we have going for us is our "open container" laws. if 2+ people are in a car, you're allowed to have an …
/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:18 AM
4

and also does nothing. it just adds another step to the "he said she said" process. administrator:"did she consent?" student A:"yes she did" student B:"no i didn't"
/r/MensRights25/05/15 01:16 AM
7

it's pretty common across the entire middle east. people move there looking for a better life, and get paid (literally) pennies a day to do backbreaking manual labor that the natives don't want to do.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 09:10 PM
1

"The Red Pill". basically a group of people who are part "pick up artist" and part "all women are inferior to men and just want sex they just don't know it yet".
/r/MensRights23/05/15 03:59 PM
1

technically, if you're a shareholder, you can call for a vote on it. if you own a controlling share of the company (which you, a regular person will NEVER be able to do for a big company like mcdonalds / reddit), you could call for the vote and just use your 51%+ to get your way.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:34 AM
5

for the first few years of reddit it was basically only a slightly more moderated chan. as it got bigger, the rulebook got bigger, but even then there were reddit-sponsored movements regarding free speech (especially considering manning / snowden), that free speech was a fundamental human right that reddit stood for. aaron must be halfway to the earth's core with all the spinning he's doing in his grave.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:33 AM
4

oh, no, didn't you hear? all white knights are exempt from the final solution of feminism.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:36 AM
7

they DID and then retracted it once people found out the author was a radical, radical, radical feminist. people found his personal facebook and he was sharing articles promoting things like mandatory castration for all men, 100% seriously.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:51 AM
3

and yet the first comment you see is the standard "for every one like this / the UVA case there's thousands that go unreported, which is what we should be focusing on guys don't pay attention to her"
/r/MensRights20/05/15 12:17 AM
1

... i never said TRP was a political movement. i'm aware that they don't consider themselves MRAs (and consider MRAs weak at that).
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:57 AM
0

where is reddit based. where is twitter based. it's not a coincidence the uber-liberal (and i mean UBER, not just "s/he's a democrat so s/he's a liberal" liberal), SJW, and feminist mouthpieces all tend to come out of one city.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:51 PM
3

the only people i've heard talking about "boycotting" the movie are super-TRP types and feminist / SJW / extremely liberal websites.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 10:41 PM
2

people like to claim it never happens, that it's a story (people who aren't in the military, that is). i've seen it happen ~5 times, and i'm not even active duty. it's not like we get told "oh hey btw next week you're going overseas for 6-12 months", we get a ton of advance notice.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:46 AM
2

yeah, we've had to become experts in "do more with less", especially since the hunger games. some people just don't realize what exactly constitutes "less".
/r/MensRights18/05/15 12:43 AM
15

guess replacing this shit from Vietnam (literally) will just have to wait, PO Sally Dodger just got pregnant again for the 3rd consecutive deployment, and she needs 3 months of paid leave that ends riiiiight after the halfway point for the deployment.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 04:00 PM
46

yes, please encourage more deployment dodgers. i'll never understand why my unit struggles to get even basic equipment, and yet they're proposing shit like this.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:52 PM
4

you're in a public place. i can legally take a picture of you whenever i want.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:17 AM
36

nah brah, as long as the enemy is non-white, they'll have the full support of the SJW brigade.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:36 PM
68

Is it just me or does that text feel like they're trying to make her look like the victim of a spiteful jury? not sure why you're even a little surprised.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 01:37 AM
73

Failing is not going. no, failing is sitting on the bleachers on your phone the whole time, or refusing to participate in the activities and just walking around the gym socializing with your bff the whole time.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 06:50 PM
5

True Feminism is for equality for all humans in all manners exists only in theory these days, sadly.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:22 PM
12

brilliant yet pointless. no college in the US would dare say feminism is hostile to men.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 10:39 PM
36

child pornography charges are filed by the state, not pressed by the victim. there's no reason why she isn't a sex offender now as well.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:00 PM
4

i kind of agree with him, albeit he was a bit blunt. change.org petitions are the epitome of armchair activism. they accomplish absolutely nothing that wasn't already in the works in the first place, and serve only as facebook clickbait / ego boosts.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 11:37 PM
19

any article controlled by feminists stays that way. any article controlled by friends of a feminist admin is off limits. any and all changes to those articles are immediately reverted and you're met with a topic ban, it's pointless to try.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:11 PM
1

quite a few, actually. and they tend to not play the victim, and instead promote the strength of women.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:22 AM
2

you're right, because the argument is loaded from the start. ostensibly, feminism is about equal rights for women. who could be against that! it's like using the word "bully" to attack someone you don't like. anyone who defends that person can be said (from your side) to be defending a bully.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:22 AM
13

i see your point, but i've yet to see a single big name liberal not defend feminism when they have to.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:16 AM
7

it's because people compare FGM done in 3rd world shitholes with a shard of glass to MGM done in a sterile, modern hospital. with that comparison, FGM is objectively much, much worse. but when you compare them equally, not so much.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 07:09 AM
2

she could have a fake ID direct from the DMV, a fake birth certificate straight from the hospital, and a fake social security card, and if she's under the legal age of consent, you're fucked.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 09:23 PM
3

that's what she did lol. she's living like a rockstar and he's in jail.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:49 AM
20

so she went back to the philipines, where being a millionaire makes you bill gates to the people, and came back just to further twist the knife? what a bitch.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:47 AM
20

best part: she complains about the over-sexualization and lack of non-white characters in video games. almost all her characters are white, and super sexualized.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:10 AM
3

16 months after ELEVEN FALSE RAPE CLAIMS? so, 8 months MAX (good behavior and whatnot) for attempting to ruin lives at LEAST 11 times. gotta love the justice system.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:52 AM
17

(and, occasionally, young women) that part made me actually laugh out loud.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:05 PM
2

GOING SJW? there's multiple openly SJW admins, and a couple SRS member admins. the top has been SJW heavy for a while now.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:12 AM
3

you'd have to go after SJW crowd too the admins won't go after their own kind, they've made that extremely clear with the special set of rules SRS subs operate under.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:12 AM
2

SRS hates it. therefor it must go.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:11 AM
24

pretty sure the point is that it was aired not long after a commercial about "like a girl".
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:29 AM
3

my comment from a different thread on the subject: otherwise known as "the end result of someone purposely antagonizing people on an anonymous medium". well, that and her history of making fake accounts to harass herself and collect feel$, i really don't care. also, quite a few of the tweets are from women, including a professional CoD player, which i find hilarious. people, regarldess of gender / orientation, are tired of her scapgoating them to make money.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:15 PM
2

god i can't stand mccarthy. i think she's an absolutely horrible actor. they need to replace her with sarah silverman, the cast is missing a deadpan comic and she's one of the best.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:59 PM
3

KotN is a disgusting show to begin with. all it does is further along nerd / gamer stereotypes (the amount of neon hair dye in the 3 seasons of the show, for example, could drown a whale) and the worst person wins it every time. S1, for example, went to a semi-pro gamer who's never won a single tournament, and was most likely chosen to win to sate the yellow fever of the fanbase. S2, they picked a rocket scientist (who's never worked on a single rocket-related thing in her life) after the outcry…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:58 PM
1

only a matter of time before it gets shut down, like any other anti-scamkeesian kickstarter does if it gains traction.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:19 AM
1

i doubt it, tbh. she's just a figurehead at this point. she'll "run", then back down and endorse a candidate who actually has a chance to win.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 02:54 AM
3

the media only cares about pushing the "Veterans are ticking PTSD-Timebombs" angle these days, sadly.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 07:48 PM
1

ah, must have missed the sarcasm.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:35 PM
3

quotas are a horrible idea.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:44 PM
3

100? that's a bit of an overestimate judging by her past fundraising.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 09:43 PM
7

using sockpuppet accounts is one of the few things that will get you banned on WP as a feminist, even if you are one of the Unblockables
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:32 PM
18

nah, she's not as smart as anita. if she was, she'd have a patreon / kickstarter /gofundme and be clamoring for donations right now. which, afaik, she hasn't done. YET.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:28 PM
1

i love how it devolved into "lol reddit turning into red pill everyone wants to beat women with no repercussions"
/r/MensRights21/12/14 04:32 PM
1

it's incredibly hard to prove perjury, almost as hard as libel/slander.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 04:28 PM
10

First: "DO NOT BE MISOGYNIST AT PEOPLE." 'harassing' someone who happens to be female doesn't make you a misogynist. “Five Guys” is a slut-shaming and misogynist joke and people should be ashamed of themselves it's not the fact THAT she cheated multiple times, it's WHO she cheated with that makes that fact relevant. also, good job continuing to water down what misogyny actually means. Anita Sarkeesian got tied into the whole thing, and that she (a) is not involved in the Zoe Post (b) has never a…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 04:24 PM
4

i'm sure the frat will be suing both the fraternity and the woman, for slander / libel at the very least.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 02:05 AM
5

First, E3 isn't a gaming conference. it's a press / investor's conference. going to E3 and expecting gaming content is like going to the movies and expecting to watch a TV show. Paragraph 4 was interesting, as it's basically saying you're only playing video games to stop yourself from going on a rampage. typical, coming from the SJW crowd at Gamasutra. being sexually promiscuous took longer than i thought to bring up LW, bonus points The entire piece reeks of concern trolling. There's no way LA …
/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:49 PM
-2

ERMAGHERD WOMEN MAKE 12 CENTS FOR EVERY 4000 DOLLARS A MAN MAKES
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:55 PM
7

that's why it's safe for them to do it. because you can't prove they are lying, the same way you can't prove they are telling the truth.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:59 PM
17

it's perfect, really. statute of limitations is long over, so he can never be investigated / charged, but they still get to slander him publicly.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:39 PM
8

SRD is also run by SRS these days. hence the migration to /r/drama.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:40 PM
1

archival purposes, fair use
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:53 PM
10

dnl makes it so your visit doesn't improve their page ranking, but still gives views / ad revenue. archive.today does that AND stops ad revenue / view counts.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 07:00 PM
1

no, that's pretty standard for a new yorker.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 04:10 PM
2

women get paid the same prize money as men in tennis, despite playing less rounds.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:04 AM
57

it's almost like EVERYONE gets harassed while walking down the street in a city known for being incredibly hostile to everyone...
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:24 PM
36

whenever you see the word "gender" in someone's title, you should already know there's a 99% chance they are only going to talk about females. they've just substituted the word "woma(e)n" for "gender" for the fields and call it a day.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:15 PM
7

... so they are openly saying that if you're accused of rape / sexual assault, you're guilty until proven innocent?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:03 PM
1

even if they are 18, it's still rape because the teachers hold a position of power over the student, so he can't legally consent to it.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:01 PM
1

the "1-4" and "1-5" statistics were debunked the instant they released the metrics for what qualified as rape for that massive 2 whole colleges study.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:00 PM
2

if they used the same qualifiers that the "study" for the "1-5" statistic used, it's believable. as in, attempted forced kissing = sexual assault = rape. catcalls = rape.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:58 PM
1

i love how gamasutra is trying to defend themselves by going "it was an opinion piece!!!123!!! you can't punish someone for an opinion! THATS CENSORSHIP!!!" when A)she's an EAL for the site B) the news coordinator for the site and C)not a freelancer like quite a few articles have claimed. when you're a vocal head / face for a company, you effectively lose the ability to write opinion pieces, because they then reflect directly upon the company itself. It would be like the head of R+D at Apple wri…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:55 PM
10

as someone who's been involved with gamergate for quite a while, and has been participating in the "Boycott of the Day" (sending emails to advertisers like Intel) i've literally never heard it called that before this article.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:27 PM
1

$7k bail for rape? jesus christ.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:55 PM
3

saying anything else is akin to victim blaming women, what else did you expect him to say?
/r/MensRights03/10/14 01:15 PM
2

your comment is exactly the response everyone has when a male student has sex with a teacher, and it's exactly what's wrong with this situation.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:25 PM
1

in a twisted, convoluted sense, i can see why they would push the rape statistic concerning frats (the 300% you showed). Frats at a lot of schools are known for parties which, unsurprisingly, usually involve alcohol and a less than rigorous method of ID'ing people (some are really good, though, and pay bouncers from local clubs to ID check, aka people with experience spotting fakes and won't get swayed by a 19 year old hottie). So, when you combine that with people who believe even a single sip …
/r/MensRights28/09/14 06:41 PM
2

In the end, he did what he did. And he went to jail. Where he deserved to go. It's a sad story. i'm sorry if i came off as defending his actions. they were horrible. but holding a 13 year old with clear mental issues to the same legal standard as a, say, 22 year old, is preposterous. he should not have gotten what is essentially life in prison at 13 and given no option for rehabilitation in a prison with kids his own age. even if he does get out after 40 years, he'll be 53 with a MASSIVE felony …
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:33 PM
2

Let's not get all teary eyed and sharpen our MRM pitchforks. He killed his grandparents. The kid obviously had issues. i'd have issues too if they beat me repeatedly and i had already tried and failed at suicide. where's the "battered child" defense when you need it...
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:20 PM
2

charged implying that the case will ever see the light of day in a court. can't risk ruining a female role model in the US these days.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 09:56 PM
9

why should you have to attempt to restrain someone who is attacking you? i know i wouldn't.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 09:56 PM
15

the entire gawker network is under massive amount of fire for their complete and open lack of journalistic integrity, so it's not surprising they've been pulling punches like this for the past few days.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 06:04 PM
16

gonna report my comment from another thread: first, i for one am truly SHOCKED that they chose a rich, beautiful, straight, white, incredibly privileged woman who has literally never faced real oppression in her entire life to be the face of women's issues. second, for all the grandstanding about how feminism includes men's issues, the name of the movement itself shows that women's issues come first, and any male issues solved are just coincidence. (as in, aside from the name feminism, the movem…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:22 PM
2

it originated as that. now it's just used as a blanket excuse for women who don't press chargers or become abusive themselves.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 09:42 PM
2

you clearly don't know anyone that has ptsd lol. i know quite a few with PTSD who have managed to not becoming murderers or abusers. edit // im not saying people with PTSD don't / aren't capable of being abusive. i'm just tired of that being the go-to excuse any time a veteran does something wrong.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 09:41 PM
30

ray rice's then girlfriend (now WIFE) didn't press charges, people claim it's just battered woman syndrome.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:37 PM
-8

no, PTSD should not be a factor. i'm fucking tired of people using PTSD as a shield against their wrong doing.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 06:37 PM
3

This is false pre Obamacare. Women had higher insurance rates than men. until that supreme court decision made it illegal to charge more for HEALTH (but not auto) insurance based on gender.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:07 PM
5

the "ray rice is a monster who routinely beat his wife" circlejerk on /r/nfl is quite strong.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 01:56 PM
13

the sub went to shit as soon as it became a default. it's basically SRS-lite nowadays.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:00 AM
22

BUT DON'T WORRY GUYS WOMEN NEVER FILE FALSE REPORTS.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:19 AM
2

there's a reason the prosecutor was disbarred and the entire DA's officer was officially reprimanded for the butchering of the case.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:31 PM
9

it's become par the course for the big subs. people just spam report posts that don't fit into their echo chamber victim mentality world, and eventually a mod who is in their same world removes it.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:25 PM
3

KKK: If blacks stop saying we hate them, we'll stop proving them right!
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:23 PM
8

TIL / AMA / etc frequently take down posts that portray men's rights activists as anything other than misogynistic racist dudebros who just want the right to beat and rape women who upset them, and universally leave up posts that are blatently false.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:21 PM
8

and in a move that's shocked absolutely no one, the post has been removed by the mods.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 04:52 PM
0

twoXC was a very reasonable place up until it became a default. are you thinking of /r/feminism, the place that bans you the instant you challenge their view that all men are evil?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:00 PM
10

2XC and TrollXC have both basically become "fempire-lite" subs since 2XC was made a default.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 07:43 PM
1

yeah, good luck getting any exceptions now that it's purge season, esp. if you're under 30 (or is it 35?)
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:18 PM
3

i wasn't laughing at you, i was laughing at the thought of there being actual prosecution against false accusers. which there almost never is.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:47 PM
2

i'm in a critically undermanned field. i can't be redeployed unless i volunteer for it, and even then it needs CC approval.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 05:51 PM
14

the police might be investigating the two women for false rape accusations BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah ok
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:47 PM
2

no fucking clue. they really need to do testing based on career. the fact that a security forces person is held to the same physical requirements as me is baffling (my job is to sit and watch a radar picture). the only real threat to me is TBMs or ARMS. and last time i checked, you can't outrun a missile.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:35 PM
12

i can walk the female run time for the air force PT test and pass. WALK.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:49 PM
2

99% of what's claimed on twitter is about as real as what's claimed on PostSecret though.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 09:42 PM
18

dude fuck that show. all it does (along with king of the nerds) is reinforce negative stereotypes / tropes. one of the judges even said that he doesn't think men should cosplay, because the costumes can't possibly be as detailed when a man does it. and i agree with the comment on her. when she was in dubai for the comic con, i was there as well (unrelated to the con, on business). saw her in the mall, asked if i could take a pic, told me she only takes pictures at cons. i was stunned and embaras…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:53 PM
2

and anyone who googles his name will forever see those accusations.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:24 PM
3

polygon was the first place i saw it, and they were full on pushing the "pedo rapist photographer" angle.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:06 PM
6

in theory, yes. but how often are both parties charged when someone gets arrested for having sex with a drunk woman?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:20 PM
6

Remember kids, it's not a false accusation if we require no evidence to be shown! this, in combination with "guilty until proven innocent" standard of california colleges means that if you're a male and having sex with women in cali, you're rapist.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:19 PM
1

it was preemptive for this article because on the initial report article people were linking her personal facebook page and basically doxxing the girl.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:53 PM
2

young pretty white girl man. gotta be that knight in shining armor, even if she is under age.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:52 PM
7

polygon is a clickbait site these days.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:51 PM
2

sorry if some of us still believe in innocent until proven guilty, not innocent until proven guilty unless a woman is involved then it's guilty until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:49 PM
2

he was arrested because people were claiming he assaulted her, and sending in "tips" to the cops with links to her tumblr of pics that were supposedly of them being sexually active (spoiler: they were porn gifs)
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:48 PM
51

i used to follow a pretty big cosplayer, yaya han, until this. she was calling for a witch hunt on her page for the guy, then when it came out he was innocent of beating and raping her like everyone thought, she started going "LOLRAPECULTURE" and spamming links to the wikipedia definition. i agreed with Cosplay is not Consent as a movement (for those that don't know, it's about the message that just because a cosplayer is dressed in revealing clothes, that doesn't mean you have the innate right …
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:46 PM
1

biggest WTF of this whole fucking story: where are her parents?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:41 PM
2

he was initially taken in for questioning about her assault. the assault that didn't happen.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:39 PM
5

she doesn't look 17. she was 16 when they met, and in those pictures she definitely looks at least 19.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:37 PM
4

he didn't break any in most modern countries. :/
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:36 PM
6

people keep saying there's evidence they were dating, and there is none. at all. not on his personal facebook, not on hers, and not on her extremely NSFW tumblr. he won't get convicted of contributing, since i doubt she'll testify against a friend.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:33 PM
3

in the US, it's guilty until proven innocent, then still guilty in the eyes of the media, public, the politicians, and probably the jury.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:40 PM
5

as someone who goes to / works at a lot of cons, the problem is definitely both genders. some women tend to treat other women cosplayers the same way some women treat gay guys, ie "its ok because i'm not sexually attracted to you / you aren't sexually attracted to me". anecdotal, but from what i've seen / had reported to me, women are far worse than men when it comes to physical harassment, but men are worse at verbal.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:36 PM
0

that's completely false, at least in the US. if you're drunk, you legally can not consent to anything.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:51 PM
7

actually, every single anti-MRA / feminst wholly believes that prosecuting false accusers will prevent ACTUAL victims from coming forward.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 07:36 PM
11

to be fair, by their definition, basically ever single male is a rapist. i don't think i've ever asked my g/f for verbal consent to sex. it just happens.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 02:59 AM
2

it's being shot down left and right, but it's only a matter of time. it's funny, really. the colbert report did a huge skit on it, should look it up.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:43 PM
1

and sadly, a lot of articles about false accusers getting jail time seem to get removed.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:01 PM
3

10 years of minimal (if any) family contact, a most likely complete loss of any and all friends, inability for gainful employment upon release. yupp, that's the good life. you can get as many degrees as you want and mcdonalds most likely won't hire you as a felon, nevermind as a convicted sex offender. not to mention private prisons are trying to make it legal to charge prisoners room / board.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:59 PM
1

the fact that she got actual, real jailtime (instead of the 3-6 months i'm used to reading about, on the rare occasions false reports are actually prosecuted -hint: it's rarely) is indeed a step forward. but i agree, more time is needed. mandatory minimum of 1/2 the minimum sentence for the crime falsely reported, plus whatever time the falsely accused spent in prison.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:57 PM
0

why don't people understand the difference between a false accusation and an unproven one? not having enough evidence for a conviction doesn't turn the situation into one of false reporting. false reporting means you purposely made shit up.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:55 PM
3

there's a reason that "guilty until proven innocent" legislative policies (sweeping across US colleges) are going unhindered and in most cases being lauded for "protecting teh wyminz"
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:54 PM
2

what's happened to TwoXC in the past year or so? it used to be a pretty good place with actual, reasonable discussion for gender issues. now it seems like it's joined the echo chamber of "silence anyone we don't agree with" subs like feminism and athiesm+
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:22 PM
2

this isn't high school, you aren't entitled to a "get out of retaliation free" card by "walking away" from a fight YOU started. i would have done the same thing as him, regardless of the attacker's gender. to clarify, i'm not going to feel safe until my attacker is either disabled or restrained (ie, handcuffs)
/r/MensRights10/05/14 10:05 AM
2

i was always under the assumption that women get into more accidents overall, but men get into more costly accidents (fender benders v. car completely totalled)
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:30 AM
5

SRS members don't, but the admins have been otherwise pretty fair when it comes to brigading. basically every sub that crossposts now uses a np.reddit or pay.reddit to avoid bans
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:28 AM
4

i've never understood the nerd circle jerk over him. im not a star trek fan, and i don't think he's a good actor. yet in geek circles, he's basically god.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 08:45 AM
2

you would get instantly banned from SA for even suggesting that idea.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:25 AM
4

any attempt to ban or restrict male circumcision in the US is immediately labeled as anti-semitic and of course we can't risk offending a religious group.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:23 AM
6

if he gets convited, you win. if he doesn't, its rape culture / rape apology at work, and you win again.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 05:23 AM
4

we just sit on the internet in our fedoras and MLP shirts making up stories about big bad feminists pulling fire alarms.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:26 AM
15

Don't expect a fair trial understatement of the fucking century in divorce courts, as a male (esp. in the UK)
/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:37 AM
12

i've seen plenty of incredible sexist / misogynistic comments here. they're all quickly and harshly downvoted into oblivion, then deleted, but they show up. every article that cites specific comments fails to show the actual comment itself, which every time i've been bothered enough to look has been downvoted almost universally.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:03 AM
1

you are correct! for some reason my reddit went from sorting by "top" to sorting by "best" :/
/r/MensRights11/04/14 03:58 AM
4

the top, 900+ score comment completely shuts down the witchhunt http://np.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/22pg1l/colin_kaepernick_reportedly_being_investigated/cgp3f4f
/r/MensRights11/04/14 03:16 AM
17

yes, yes it is. it's discrimination. it varies by state currently, but more and more are making it illegal to vary price based on gender(re: ladies nights). admission based on gender has long since been illegal.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:43 AM
8

as with a lot of things in the same realm, women-only is illegal, if rarely challenged. example being bars with "ladies' night". take em to court and you win, but i doubt you'll ever be wanted in that bar again.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:53 AM
13

it's not restricted, no (like curves, it isn't "female only" - that's illegal-) it's just heavily aimed towards females.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:16 AM
7

planet fitness / cardio express / curves
/r/MensRights06/04/14 03:18 AM
1

the age of consent where she's a citizen / lives, scotland, is 16.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:08 AM
1

that brings up a more murky situation. hypothetically, if they hooked up in NYC, would new york's age of consent laws take precedence over scotlands?
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:07 AM
1

Don't forget that there were threads here of direct links turned into screenshots (at the request of mods, doxxing rules and whatnot) of the author's facebook, which was covered in radfem article shares; stuff like "why all men suck" "why women should make twice as much as men" "why circumcision is funny" etc (not actual titles, can't recall the actual names, but basically the same ideas).
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:05 AM
2

thanks, TIL :)
/r/MensRights29/03/14 09:55 AM
6

in 2011 they had 11.4 million subs. bringing their total from SUBSCRIPTION ALONE to over $2bil, nevermind sales from the actual games / expansions, and microtransactions. and that little girl who needed tens of thousands, despite having loaded parents, never actually finished the game because ::shocker:: a child's attention span is short as hell.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:20 AM
1

breitbart is about as reliable as fox news.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:14 AM
5

how the fuck is that legal? Title IX only applies to government funds, not private funds...
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:08 AM
3

dropmycumberbritches is a troll tumblr dedicated to getting people to make posts like this. source: i live on /r/tumblrinaction
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:34 AM
2

Gen. Sinclair maintained that the accuser was angry because he refused to leave his wife. Her private journal confirmed this but don't worry, this totally wasn't a case of revenge using a hot-button item.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:22 AM
11

encourage individuals to be responsible for their own safety but..but... that's rape apology at it's finest!!! /s
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:02 AM
144

hope he can take them for a good 8 figures or so. something needs to be done to show schools you can't just believe every single embarassed girl.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 09:29 AM
1

i'd be willing to bet that noone from reddit actually posts that anywhere.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 03:35 AM
3

she also claims that mirror's edge was "too hard to women to play" and demanded that ME2 be easier so women can enjoy it.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:17 AM
3

internalized misogyny, duh!
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:15 AM
2

can get you banned DOES get you banned. source: currently banned
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:14 AM
3

he's a writer for cracked now, which has at least an article a week on how men are evil or how we need to stop oppressing women.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:14 AM
2

my, don't i feel like a dick now.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 02:47 AM
1

how many school shootings did you have? semi-serious, but the end result will still be sarcasm fyi
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:01 AM
3

shit, my stepdad had rifle team at his high school. as in, a school-sponsored team that competed against other schools in accuracy contests. with rifles.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 04:56 AM
1

They showed a film like this to us during our yearly sexual assault prevention and response (SAPR) day. while it showed male victims in it (2, i believe), the amount of time spent on their stories was less than 1/3rd of that on the females (individually, not overall, of course). the CBTs (computer based training) we have to do every 6 months doesn't even include male victims, and of course all the attackers are males.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 10:30 AM
4

i'll be mildly surprised if it even continues for very long. i'm sure the school is being flooded with "safe space" complaints and it's only a matter of time until someone pulls a fire alarm (/s on that last part)
/r/MensRights16/02/14 10:26 AM
7

there was a teacher in florida iirc (i'll see if i can find a link to the story, it was a while back) who was ACCUSED of sexually assaulting one of his students (he was a gym teacher). the mere accusation cost him his job, his ability to teach in the state, his wife (who, to be fair, was clearly looking for an excuse to get out of the marriage), and his savings. his name was plastered all over the florida news, and he was forced to move out of the state and change his name despite being cleared …
/r/MensRights16/02/14 10:18 AM
1

sex is the one act you can't be held responsible for while drunk (at least, as a female. as a male, you were clearly able to decide what you were doing)
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:39 AM
6

BATTERED WOMAN DEFENSE MEANS EVERYTHING SHE DOES TO HIM IS TOTALLY OK!!! /s /sigh
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:45 AM
3

facebook and tumblr have made it quite clear that only women can be the targets of gendered hate speech.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:39 AM
12

will wheaton has been a massive tool for years now. he's vehemently anti-MRA (he's anti- anyone who isn't a radfem), and his tumblr reads like basically any other radfem SJW: half random fandom stuff, half "all men are evil".
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:15 AM
6

i'd sue to get that $1000, honestly. no reason dropped charges should show up on your record, nevermind requiring you to pay to have tem expunged.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:26 AM
1

most programs that i'm aware of won't let you just jump over a masters degree to a PHD.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 05:38 AM
2

telling the "truth" is working REAL well for feminists, and has been the past ~2 decades.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 10:17 AM
2

how do you jump from a BoA, over a masters, right into a QUANTUMN PHYSICS PHD. it's most likely bullshit
/r/MensRights17/01/14 10:12 AM
10

i understand that there needed to be changes made in india regarding rape laws, but i feel like the pendulumn has swung too far in the opposite direction.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:52 AM
-1

there's a massive, massive difference between "social justice advocates" and "social workers". edit // yumm, dat admin-endorsed brigading.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:25 AM
-2

it at least SOUNDS somewhat legitimate to me. i guess i just spend too much time on TiA to ever take "social justice" seriously ever again.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:39 AM
2

I didn't take the idea that feminists silenced anyone who wasn't one of them seriously until now. you haven't been around here long then.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:38 AM
14

the right to face your accuser doesn't exist in modern-day rape trials.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:27 AM
-1

the fact that they have a department for "social justice" is absolutely disgusting. edit // looks like the SRS brigade is slipping, can't even get me negative.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:26 AM
9

false. US protests never actually happen.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 07:06 AM
4

[Misleading Title] we really need post flair.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 04:23 AM
1

In Borderlands 2, they made Axton retroactively bi, and while it was heavily implied, they "made" Hammerlock gay by editing an echo recording to change the word "partner" to "boyfriend" (partner as in research partner).
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:14 PM
51

Welcome to dealing with feminists.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:53 PM
3

or the feminists in the real world.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:23 PM
3

anyone who posts here is automatically banned from the fempire, i believe.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:22 PM
1

no idea about that, but there's at least one admin that's a frequenter of SRS
/r/MensRights25/10/13 11:37 AM
1

yeah, i don't see jail sentences for non-voilent crime / drug offenses going away any time soon.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 01:58 AM
2

numerous AAA title companies have invited her to basically be a freelance contributor to the game's character design, and one has gone so far as to retroactively make characters gay / bi to appease her (Gearbox)
/r/MensRights25/10/13 01:54 AM
9

PUAs and TRP aren't involved in the MRM, and never have been.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 01:11 AM
5

didn't the SPLC take that down, and relieve the writer of his position, after people pointed out he was PUBLICLY sharing radical feminism articles on his personal facebook, including anti-MRA ones?
/r/MensRights25/10/13 01:09 AM
2

should buy a 6 of blonde just as a fuck you to the haters.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 02:22 PM
3

TL;DR : don't like the slogan? too bad. it's your fault you're offended, not ours.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:12 PM
3

Feminism hasn't been about equality in decades.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:07 PM
10

not getting married doesn't prevent these problems. if you LIVE with the woman, or are in a serious / dedicated relationship with her for X amount of years (can't recall off the top of my head), she can still get half your shit thanks to "common law" marriages.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 11:36 AM
12

i've never understood why you can relentlessly attack the character / past of the accused, but the accuser is off limits, if they even allow you to know who it is.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 09:58 AM
6

there's a LOT of misinformation spread / taught about Title IX, like that it applies to girls ONLY.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 09:57 AM
5

like i said on the original "male students" post, i can't wait to hear about the massive settlement every single male student in the school will get for this MASSIVE title 9 violation.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 09:36 AM
1

Search results are also heavily influenced by what you have previously searched. so if you're a feminist blogger constantly searching (using google) for anti-woman material, google is going to remember that.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 08:59 AM
0

pretty sure it's a satirical reinvention of other "don't rape" lists. because blaming men for all the problems of the world > taking responsibility for your actions.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 12:17 PM
3

calm down, i don't think he meant joke like it wasn't to be taken seriously. it's a joke in that i'm sure the ACTUAL prices were different, but they put the signs up to make a point: that affirmative action is racist as fuck. it basically says "oh, you're not white? you're clearly not smart enough / able-bodied enough to get into college / get this job on your own merits, here's some help"
/r/MensRights20/10/13 12:14 PM
2

estranged =! ex wife.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 10:32 PM
10

We need a "misleading title" post flair on this sub.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:43 AM
2

ood answer. ALSO, male circumcision is NOTHING next to Female Genital Mutilation. Male circumcision is NOT performed on a male who is pinned to the ground, it is NOT performed using rusty razor blades, shards of stone or glass, dirty lids from cans. The parts that allow pleasure are NOT gouged away. Please, tell this man that he must NOT compare the two. We must NOT take away the attention on FGM and put it on some whiny baby’s IDEA of mutilation. i fucking love this arguement. yes, let's compar…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 11:43 AM
4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_IX most relevant thing i could find not pertaining to employment in a few minutes.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 11:10 AM
20

well, congratulations to that school district paying for the college of all the male students after the lawsuit they are going to be hit with.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:17 PM
11

this also happened ~20 years before the duke case.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:36 AM
1

typical feminist. "Waaaah i didn't get my way waaaaaah evil men waaaaah patriarchy"
/r/MensRights15/10/13 11:10 AM
13

i don't hear feminists complaining about the Adonis-like male characters. i don't know about you, but i don't know anyone with a 10 pack who can run for miles on end and jump between countless buildings, all while hip-firing a 10 guage with zero physical fatigue.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 01:26 AM
4

feminists can and will still call you a woman-hater. they refer to it as "internalized misogyny".
/r/MensRights12/10/13 08:07 AM
3

implying it already hasn't.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:11 AM
1

anyone who uses the word "cis" in a conversation has immediately lost any and all credibility, and should just be ignored.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 03:10 PM
0

take a look around reddit / tumblr sometime. sure, they don't represent ACTUAL feminism, but they're the ones who are the loudest, so they are the ones getting policy made for them.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:35 PM
0

mostly? the radical / internet feminists. they cite women like these as examples of how feminism is working.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:31 PM
64

YOU'RE RUINING MY ECHO CHAMBER GUYS /srs
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:50 PM
1

he's probably pointing out the fallacy behind feminists using these women as examples of how feminism is working and making more women successful. when 19 out of the 20 did absolutely nothing to earn their wealth.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:46 PM
1

he's probably pointing out the fallacy behind feminists using these women as examples of how feminism is working and making more women successful. when 19 out of the 20 did absolutely nothing to earn their wealth.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 08:46 PM
16

go look at some of the older blog posts, they explain it pretty clearly. it's done to fuck with bots.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:15 PM
1

the point is that they remove perceived anti-women pages cart blanche, and yet even the most extreme anti-men pages (such as "all men should be castrated") get to stay.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:17 PM
1

i'm pretty sure we all already know what will happen, what DOES happen.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:16 PM
5

various media outlets wouldn't report on it at all. they're pretty in-line with the feminazi dogma. hence why when a male is ACCUSED of a sex-related crime, its all over the place, but when a female is they're lucky if they get a blurb on the evening news.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:58 PM
11

Patriarchy in action! Internalized misogyny! Rape Culture! Buzzwords yaaaay!
/r/MensRights23/09/13 12:29 AM
0

$.77 FOR EVERY $1.00 MEANS EVERYTHING ELSE DOESN'T MATTER /s
/r/MensRights21/09/13 09:06 PM
4

yeah, good luck getting any serious discussion on reddit with that.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 06:59 PM
2

I posted a few times. really not worth the viewing, you already all know what's being said. same old garbage like "well, the boys definitely do want it, i know i did, but the girls are clearly being taken advantage of".
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:42 AM
12

extremely liberal website? totally going to have a men's rights section. this petition totally won't be treated the same way the white house treats its petitions. /s
/r/MensRights17/09/13 06:24 AM
3

seriously. 14 years for child porn? sounds alright. factor in SHE WAS RUNNING AN ENTIRE CP RING FOR 13 YEARS and it's a slap in the face of justice.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:05 PM
2

wonder why she didn't get charged with involuntary manslaughter as well for actively contributing to his suicide.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 08:18 PM
2

to be fair, the US educational system is absolute garbage right now. classes like home economics need to ACTUALLY teach some economics, like how to balance a checkbook / bank account, how to do your taxes, etc. in my school district, the class is mandatory (regardless of gender), and the amount of things they teach you that are actually useful is pretty low, and some are downright false and outdated (cross-contamination? don't worry, just use water to rinse off that wood cutting board you just c…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:11 PM
6

trying to discuss things on /r/feminism that isn't on the party line is a quick way to get banned, even if you're 100% right.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:09 PM
3

the REAL Bro Code
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:44 PM
1

good thing consent means literally nothing nowadays, since it can be revoked without noticing the other party, according to college / internet feminists.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:17 AM
17

part of the problem is that most of the cited (and deleted) links WEREN'T blog links at all : / and MAY get trampled? it's pretty obvious the trampling has already happened.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:41 PM
40

you must have missed the shitstorm caused when wikipedia ADMINS were openly deleting / editing the mens right section, removing any and all factual information because "it wasn't properly sourced" or "blog links aren't sources" and reverting it to the feminist definition which boiled down to jezebel links, manboobz links, and "men crying because the patriarchy isn't working as well for them anymore" definitions.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 03:30 PM
15

if they are both completely hammered, i still don't understand why only the male is responsible. it's utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:46 PM
2

i'll edit my post, forgot that i only put my location in an earlier post.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:26 PM
2

parking lot accidents, unless someone actually admits fault to their company / the other company, it gets treated as a 50/50, regardless of whether or not you actually contributed to the accident. edit // i live in CT
/r/MensRights31/08/13 05:52 PM
0

i believe it works out to something like "women get into more accidents, but the accidents men get into tend to cost more overall". so if 10 women get into 10 accidents that cost the insurance companies $10,000 total, 7 men get into 7 accidents that cost $15,000 total. edit // arbitrary numbers / scale, do not take as exact numbers.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 05:50 PM
3

for future reference, you're not supposed to say ANYTHING to a person after a accident. saying "are you ok?" can (and will) be construed as guilt from causing the accident, regardless of whether or not you actually caused it. source: was almost listed as being at fault for being rear-ended AT A RED LIGHT by a woman who i asked "are you ok?". thankfully, a guy was at the bus stop near the light who saw the whole thing.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 05:49 PM
1

in my state, the cops won't even show up to a parking lot accident unless A)they are already there or B) someone gets injured.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 05:47 PM
25

if you factor in average number of hours worked, women make more than men. and women want more. lol.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 02:25 AM
1

that has to be considered fraud or attempted fraud.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 08:27 PM
1

fox's ACTUAL news programs are actually pretty fucking amazing, journalism-wise. the problem most people have is their opinion shows which they do (or did) next to nothing to differentiate from their NEWS shows, and often portrayed themselves as news.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:13 PM
2

Murders are very rare. so does that mean murder isn't a problem?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:44 AM
3

regret turns any sexual / physical encounter into assault. days, months, even years after the fact.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 04:35 AM
12

very sympathetic? there's at least one is openly a member of SRS lol. the rest, yes, extremely sympathetic, if the violentacrez debacle wasn't proof enough of that.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:25 AM
14

youtube doesn't physically review the reports. if a video receives enough reports, it's automatically taken down, THEN reviewed eventually if the owner requests it. same way they deal with DMCA reports. anyone can claim it and have a video taken down, it's a much bigger pain in the balls to get it back up.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:22 AM
14

advertising on 4chan: bad idea. advertising reddit on 4chan: worse idea.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:38 PM
8

not really. challenging feminism in the US atm is basically suicide for any politician / newscaster, since if you don't goose-step in line, they go on massive tirades about how you hate women.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 12:57 AM
87

WHAT A TACOFEST
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:23 AM
8

and the threads in changemyview are filled with massively upvoted comments saying we're all misogynistic assholes, or highly upvoted comments of people using outdated studies / outright lies explaining why the MRM is useless. not much of a bright side imo. it's not like the reddit admins would ever let a comment showing the MRM as something good be a "best of" winner anyways.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 09:34 PM
-2

obvious fake / troll is obvious
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:04 PM
3

AF. the video had a ton of pentagon IG people speaking in it as well as the victims.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:29 PM
-10

big surprise, the polar opposite of conservatives is the polar opposite. extreme liberals hate men as much as extreme conservatives hate women.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:30 PM
16

there is no technical "rape" charge in the military. it's all "sexual assault". source: i just sat thru 4 hours of sexual assault prevention and reporting "training" yesterday (all male aggressors, big surprise).
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:29 PM
-1

the age of consent in their state is 16.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:48 AM
3

the age of consent is 16 in their state.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:47 AM
20

it's like /r/politics. i unsub, then i can't remember why i unsubbed so i resub, then i remember why i unsubbed.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:47 AM
5

except they legally CAN NOT consent until the age of 21 to put alcohol in their bodies. that's why if you have a sip of a beer and get pulled over and tested, you're losing your license.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:45 AM
5

that's fine, no need to be sorry for having an opinion that's different than someone else's.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:45 AM
20

it's not about increasing the punishment, it's about societies view of these types of situations. if a male student gets raped by his attractive female teacher, in today's society, he has to actively pursue charges for them to even be brought, whereas if a female student did the same, the world would stop for her.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:31 AM
18

she got 2 underage minors drunk then had sex with them, and isn't being charged with rape. a male in that same situation with 2 female athletes would be lynched before trial.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:26 AM
28

they can't consent to the drinking, they aren't old enough.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:24 AM
3

since it wasn't related to the school, i believe the "authority" issue doesn't apply
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:30 AM
53

Original Article The age of consent in that state is 16, so they were of age to consent, but the issue is with the fact that she supplied minors with alcohol, but not rape, which i find interesting (reverse the genders and see how that works out).
/r/MensRights31/07/13 03:06 AM
2

No female dictators / tyrants? Catherine the Great, Queen Mary, Queen Elizabeth 1, and Queen Isabella would like a word with you. The vast majority of pedophiles / child abusers are male? outside of [citation needed], most of the information found via google-fu puts the numbers at about even (male-biased studies have women doing more, female-biased studies have men doing more).
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:10 AM
34

white knight with a rat tail getting arrested while wearing a (presumably) skirt? golden.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:41 AM
18

but...but... the patriarchy isn't counting those votes! that's why we have a predominantly male congress!
/r/MensRights29/07/13 10:32 PM
0

one of the best games (imho) ever made featured a female protagonist and a (robotic) female antagonist - Portal. The 2nd game in the series is (spoilers maybe?) about those 2 females teaming up and beating the big bad dumb (robotic) male.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:43 PM
5

that is LITERALLY all she does. she found / made a mouthpiece for her complaints, and conned other feminists into donating money into her fund, which was basically "buy videogames for me so i can play them" under the guise of "exposing" the patriarchy in said games. when she was over a year behind on her FIRST kickstarter milestone, all her supporters claimed she just needed more money, and anyone pointing out the fact that all her supporters got scammed was just being a misogynistic typical gam…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:40 PM
-1

that is fucking depressing. although, using a feminazi consultant on a game where the main / only character is female was a good choice (compared to a game where the main character was male).
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:38 PM
6

i enjoy how notch is even on that list at all. he carbon copied infiniminer, and sat back and collected millions because someone made the game go viral. he's also a pretentious douchebag. has sarkeesian actually done any of her videos yet, or is she still begging for money while other people play the games / do the videos for her?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:36 PM
3

that would be like justifying viewing a gawker article just because it wasn't a hate-filled PoS for a change.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:58 PM
1

can someone who's already looked at it post screenshots? not going to give huffpo pageviews because they didn't spew misandrist drivel for once.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:21 PM
28

because it's showing that women can be the monsters in a relationship, which is clearly a bullying tactic /s
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:56 PM
2

unless the contract states that she should get a certain amount of the earnings, he should deposit the money then instantly withdraw it.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:59 AM
1

i enjoy the fact that feminazi mongoloids have to grasp at straws so much to try and discredit the MRM. this isn't the first time an article has mentioned /r/mensrights and another random, obviously troll, hate subreddit just to compare them. edit // the best part is, some people will actually visit the subreddit and realize that alternet is just becoming another jezebel.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:30 PM
1

meh, it's pretty par the course for military sexual assault / harassment training. not a single agressor in any of the yearly CBTs we have to do is female, and only one victim is male (male aggressors too, and it was only recently added).
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:08 AM
-3

there's a difference between saying "kill all men" and "threatening" to shoot up a school, i just feel like this is a "thought police" issue and if a girl had said the same thing she'd be in the same situation.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:55 PM
2

sorry, but your friend had possibly the worst lawyer possible. if she's WORKING, child support /alimony should be minimal (if any alimony at ALL). There's also no way all the debt is all in his name alone, unless she never used any credit cards. if her name was on the card, she's a cosigner (not sure of the proper term in regards to CCs, so bare with me) and the debt is just as much hers as it is his. Also, if he has ANY of the recipets, he can prove it as well. Unless he had godlike credit and …
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:28 PM
-2

i'm confused as to why this is an issue for /r/MensRights, and not /r/politics. sure, it was a boy who said it, but i doubt that his gender was highly influential in his arrest. Maybe i'm missing something here?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:11 PM
1

yeah, it forces them to ignore the fact that men are statistically more "loyal" to companies than women, and when you work for a company for a long time, you make more money.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:49 AM
1

and therein lies the issue of wikipedia admins / mods not being neutral like they claim to be (kind of like the reddit admins). it would be one thing if their comments on MRM articles were true (and honestly, in some cases, they are. stop citing blogs for wikipedia articles), but it's another thing that they (again, like reddit) selectively apply the rules concerning citation.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 09:44 PM
2

the famous circular logic of feminists in regards to STEM jobs. STEM fields don't hire women, so women don't get degrees in STEM fields, so STEM fields don't hire women.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 08:05 PM
1

i got banned from there once (got unbanned too!) for contributing to a discussion. i wasn't speaking as a MRA, or even as a male. someone pointed out that i post here, and then i was banned. thankfully, another mod unbanned me, but i see no reason to go back there.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 07:53 PM
1

the handler of the account seems to be taking the criticism fairly well.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 07:49 PM
1

I'm confused as to how this thread is only about how other countries have lost more soldiers in war.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 07:42 PM
1

i'm not sure about Ivy league (US atleast), but just about every major college accepts wikipedia now as a source, as long as its not the ONLY source. edit // and i'm sure rules are different when it comes to stuff like a doctoral thesis, but for a sociology / "gender" studies / etc class, wikipedia works.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 07:31 PM
9

big surprise, another feminist article that groups all men together.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 07:31 PM
1

that's the point: it doesn't take much effort at all. they basically do it to get a laugh from their friends / echo chamber. wikipedia is different, because it's clear and open anti-men "moderation" policies actually have an impact. when redfems can create / edit the articles on the MRM and use words like "mansplaining" while "citing" feminist blogs (and often nothing at all), its disturbing. it's even more disturbing when a wikipedia admin comes in, deletes a rectified, fully sourced article an…
/r/MensRights06/07/13 07:11 PM
1

the movie "Bully" (watch it, it's on netflix) shows this quite well.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 07:00 PM
3

just a little. :)
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:59 PM
4

Just make sure she knows your point of view. Other than that, there's really nothing you can do. You can't force her to get an abortion, and you can't force her to keep it.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:59 PM
2

because prosecuting false allegations by women has a direct correlation with women not reporting. duh. /s
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:50 PM
1

it's not a law in the states, but it's a pretty common practice here (atleast for civil cases).
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:49 PM
10

but...but...requiring evidence in regards to sexual assault would do nothing but prevent BILLIONS, literally BILLIONS, of women from coming forth each year in fear of being prosecuted for false reporting!
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:38 PM
10

so she's slut-shaming them?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:36 PM
-9

women have never had equal pay for equal work. at one time, it was being paid less for the same / more work. now, it's being paid the same / more for less work.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:35 PM
10

there's next to no one willing to back it because the second a feminist group gets wind of it you're labeled as wife beating misogynists who want to take away the right to vote and keep women in the kitchen. it's political / social suicide right now. if any politician came out, right now, and said that the lily ledbetter fair pay act was based on lies and that women don't really make $.77 for ever $1 a man makes, he would either A) never get re-elected ever again or B) be impeached / stripped of…
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:32 PM
2

its urban dictionary, no one cares. it's not representative of any real group of people. it takes 30 minutes or less to get any definition you want to the very top. you could easily go to the definition of "watermelon" and have the top voted one be "kind of like an orange, but its not!".
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:27 PM
10

also, passing a kidney stone as a man is rated as more painful than giving birth.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:24 PM
10

i dont want to serve with some guy who doesn't want to be there either.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 06:23 PM
20

at the end of the article it says she did it because she was spurned by his friend.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 04:52 PM
3

SRS is still quite alive and well. the best example is the whole violentacrez incident where SRS spread the dox of said user all across reddit, and the admins did absolutely nothing about it, and refuse (to this day) to answer any questions as to WHY. meanwhile, they ban any subreddit they don't agree with the second they have a "legitimate" reason.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:00 AM
1

good :) sadly, i just now saw the post of the reddit admin "reminding" us about the policy on doxxing, which i found quite hilariously ironic.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:13 AM
3

the best part about this whole thing is that if you've ever met ANYONE from PA, they're the most accepting group of people. ever. i had the pleasure of working for them last PAX East, and they love everyone, regardless of race / gender / orientation. it saddens me that he basically caved in to them : /
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:35 PM
35

I'll be surprised if any action is taken by the admins. they made it perfectly clear they don't care about any sub that they don't like. edit // anyone know how many subs are still enforcing the "gawker network" ban?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:32 PM
1

pedophelia? no. but definitely sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:43 PM
16

teacher + student relationships aren't legal in any US state. you can't possibly consent in a situation like that where someone has absolute power over you.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 06:53 PM
10

women.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 04:26 AM
31

a little. tara was intoxicated, but clearly expressed her desire to NOT have sex, got raped. jason got kidnapped and tied to a bed, begged them not to do anything to him, and they raped him.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:40 PM
3

yes! that is correct.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:40 PM
38

same thing happened in true blood. jason was gang raped over a long period of time, noone said a word. when one of the females was raped (jessica i think?), the internet EXPLODED over a rape being shown on television like that.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:52 PM
5

aye, a few people in here seemed to have taken that as she's paying HIM.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:45 AM
9

she's paying the SCHOOL, not brian banks, from what i get out of this article.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 12:46 AM
68

its getting attention, but it's being hit pretty hard by trolls / feminists talking about how feminism is really about equality, and men are just crying for attention.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 09:53 PM
1

YOU FORGOT THE [TW] TAG SHITLORD CIS MALE SCUM
/r/MensRights09/06/13 05:14 PM
3

all the military CBTs on sexual harassment / assault are about men doing the assaulting / harassing. sure, there's ONE scene in ONE CBT with a male victim, but the aggressors are still male.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 05:13 PM
-3

report it and move on.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 07:33 PM
8

give it another hour before its taken down by facebook.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:00 PM
2

she ended up being almost a year behind on her FIRST milestone, and instead released videos of OTHER PEOPLE DOING HER WORK. she's a scammer, 100%.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:29 AM
4

saw "Anita Sarkeesian", stopped reading. kind of sad i gave pageviews to an article defending a kickstarter scammer.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:57 AM
1

they need to see that their complaints are being taken seriously. but that's the problem: they aren't, atleast not by anyone in a position of power.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:41 AM
1

why would she? chances are. she'll cite it, her womans gender studies teacher will see the title and assume the citation is correct, furthering the issue the author was attempting to bring to light.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:32 PM
1

take responsibility over the fact that republicans left embassy security underfunded?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:23 AM
38

not only is this the first time i've ever heard the term "brogrammers", but please point me in the direction of the companies giving those over the top perks.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:47 AM
3

Yet if you suggest something like that in regards to, say, car insurance, where women pay vastly less than men, you're immediately called a misogynist who wants women back in the kitchen.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 09:30 PM
7

i love how most of the comments seem to be "well, they shouldn't have been making those jokes so its ok that she publicly shamed them".
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:40 AM
1

even in deployed locations, the medics offices are full of condoms, the BX/PX has more condoms than a 7/11, and you can get the pill quite easily.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:26 AM
1

then how would female soldiers get out of deployments by magically being pregnant for each one!
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:24 AM
1

we also have lives, independent thoughts, and IQs above 30, which is absent the other armed forces.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:17 AM
7

NOW! That's what I call Sexism Vol. 65!
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:53 PM
-2

Just don't try to compare female circumcision to male circumcision, because then you're clearly comparing a woman getting brutalized as a child in a 3rd world country to a boy in a major western hospital.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:52 PM
0

google, mostly xD. A lot of feminists cite girls getting half their vagina cut off using a glass shard in 3rd world countries and equate it to the precision cuts of a 1st world surgeon.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:45 PM
-1

Don't forget the comparisons between female circumcisions done in a tribal ceremony in Africa and the ones done in a hospital environment. Glass shards and sterile equipment are the same thing, right?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:30 PM
4

What's that? You used the color pink for your Breast ©ance® fundraiser? We're going to sue you now.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:29 PM
11

The rest of them, batting their eyelashes and flirting to get out of work, and chasing married guys they found attractive, well fuck them. bingo. any time a female in my unit doesn't want to do something, she just flirts with an NCO and has him tell someone else to do it. thankfully, we only have a few females who act like that. funnily enough, those are also the ones who firmly believe in the vastly different PT requirements for females and males (males females )
/r/MensRights13/05/13 04:40 PM
0

that'll show em. suspend two 7 year old boys for making pencilguns. Bradshaw said the policy has been in place for at least two decades. It also bans drawing a picture of a gun and pointing a finger in a threatening manner. i would LOVE to see their interpretation of a "threatening manner".
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:56 PM
1

the judge can veto the guilty verdict too, if he so pleases.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:46 PM
-3

the next person to cite the onion for something is getting pistol whipped.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:59 PM
5

no judge in the states would give her death, she'll get life.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:22 PM
0

ah yes, the case of "both parties are drunk, the male is the rapist". awesome. you should probably work in the detail of "if she didn't say yes, she didn't consent"
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:53 PM
0

i can't remember the code, but putting a line of java (easily google-able) into the URL easily lets you modify a webpage on your end as well.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:30 PM
7

a lot of feminists seem to use sexual assault and sexual harassment interchangeably.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:58 PM
2

you apparently weren't around for the creepshots (and related subreddits) fiasco.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 09:00 PM
8

the biggest feminist i know has never worked a day in her life, didn't bother applying for scholarships to college because her parents are loaded (well, her dad is, her mom hasn't worked a day in her life either), and does nothing but sit around and scour the internet for feminism-related articles, and attend protests exclaiming how privilege is holding her back.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 06:23 PM
0

wait, didn't feminists just explode about a year ago for a subreddit that showcased the same type of photography of women?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:55 PM
1

sorry, but regret sex is never rape sex. you can't decide that you aren't consenting after its already been done. you can't consent, wake up, realize your friends will make fun of you, then decide you were raped to save face.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:53 PM
2

feminism hasn't been about equality in over 2 decades.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:51 PM
-8

don't know why you're downvoted, hating on muslims is an instant 1k karma on atheism.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:45 PM
12

seriously. in just a few months, we've managed to oppress the poor wimmin another who $.05!
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:55 AM
1

so if you're a straight white male who's tall and attractive, but lives in the middle east, you're severely dispriviledged. lol.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 11:36 AM
6

you underestimate the blind fanaticism of the fempire. since we are men and not ashamed about it (women as well), we're as offensive to them as child porn.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:52 AM
7

but nothing about this sub is wrong or illegal. depends on your point of view. this sub is very wrong in the eyes of feminazis and their ilk.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:36 AM
5

the admins are openly in bed with SRS. messaging them would do absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:35 AM
1

he stopped the bus to solve the problem. should he have kept driving and let her continue to spiral out of control?
/r/MensRights13/10/12 05:55 PM
4

if it was a street tussle, i'd totally agree. but she was attacking him while he was DRIVING A BUS FULL OF PEOPLE. it was completely needed to prevent her from putting them ALL at risk.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 11:17 AM
24

atheismplus has nothing to do with atheism fyi
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:28 AM
1

all the white knights in that thread make me giggle.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:42 AM
2

because the admits support SRS.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:14 AM
2

that would be interesting, seeing as how a vast majority of their members are men, and they believe that men can't be raped.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:13 AM
1

i've always assumed the goons were the ones who raided places / generally caused trouble for everyone that SA didn't like. SA was very much like 4chan until a few years ago. sure, a few boards were absolute shit, but others were pretty awesome.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 03:04 AM
1

first off, how do you define "goon". because if just being an active member of SA makes you a goon, then i was a goon until about 2 years ago.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:55 AM
3

gameoftrolls didn't get banned for doxxing. they got banned because of one of hueypriests friends got trolled by them and went crying to him about it.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 02:22 PM
7

because being a sick fuck isn't illegal. he did his damnedest to prevent illegal content from being posted to subs he modded that may have attracted it (like jailbait) and when it inevitably was posted, he or his mod crew removed it extremely quickly, often before it was reported. you can talk about how "sexualizing minors is wrong", yet i don't see a goon squad spamming the sears facebook with child porn for sexualizing minors, like they did to /r/jailbait.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:30 PM
9

they also hired a few ex-jezebel writers, which has shown in what has basically become a weekly "how gamers hate women" piece.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:19 PM
1

4chan wasn't founded by goons. fyi. there's a big difference between someone who posts on SA and a goon. i am well aware of SRS's links, however. they won't touch 4chan because they love the negative press, and 4chan is infinitely better at doxxing and other malicious activities than any SA/SRS member will ever be.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:38 PM
2

because they have the admins in their corner. we don't. being "right" or "wrong" makes no difference when those who make/enforce the rules are backing you.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:43 AM
11

we stand up to the fempire. we believe that men aren't evil monsters on an ivory throne of priviledge who constantly beat and rape every woman we meet. the SRS neckbeard whiteknight brigade takes deep offense to this.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:42 AM
11

i believe it when i see it. they've been promising to take us down "soon" for the past year or so.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:55 PM
1

oh, i'm not saying she's dumb. i'm just confused as to why people are acting like she worked her way from flipping burgers to the CEO of a billion dollar company. she hasn't worked a day in her life.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 04:39 AM
1

it's not reasonable doubt that they might be innocent. it's that the jury has to be sure beyond a reasonable doubt that they are guilty. and what jury won't believe a woman crying about how the big bad man definately raped her even though she bragged about the encounter to all her firends?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:10 AM
1

but it's all ok, guys, 100 years ago men were vastly ahead of women, so it's only right that women become vastly ahead of men. i mean after all, they only make 13 cents for every dollar a man makes. maybe next time you shouldn't discriminate against women in the STEM fields, all those women with STEM degrees are really hurting atm.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:06 AM
3

why am i not surprised that she didn't earn a dime of her money. inheritance then paying someone to invest for you is hardly work.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:05 AM
1

what's disturbing is, this has and does happen to people : /.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:32 PM
8

sadly, if you look at his post history, either this is the most exciting and unlucky man on the planet, or he's making this up. either way, lots of good info in the thread on what options he has available to him (lots of shit ones too, like burning down the house).
/r/MensRights07/10/12 04:12 PM
-4

he couldn't consent, so yes, it was.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 05:06 AM
4

oh i'm fully aware, and 30k was definately not the cheapest, iirc it was their highest. keep in mind they were also registering sporty cars.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 05:45 PM
9

yeah, if Top Gear has taught me anything, it's to drive really really fast that UK males in their late teens / early 20s get absolutely accosted when it comes to car insurance. one of the quotes they got was in the mid 5 digit area (something like 30k / year, solo of course) compared to a female's ~3k / year. it's obscene.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:46 PM
-1

there was no CP on that forum that stay up for any amount of time. anytime some was posted (intentionally or not) it was taken down by the mods. but mods can't take down a picture of a butt as it's posted as a ton of non-subscribed, first post new accounts flood the thread with "NEED MORE PICS OF THIS 14 YAER OLD NAKED" and the subreddit became banned within minutes.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 06:40 AM
6

this is nothing new. they made it blatently clear they were in the pockets for SRS when the whole jailbait fiasco went down.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:49 AM
3

it's not legal, in the same way that ladies' nights are not legal. just remember that a vast majority of people who buy a gym membership rarely end up going more than once a month, and end up actually paying MORE per visit than regular members. side note: if you go to the gym less than 4 times a month, a lot of gyms have "day passes" that cost less than the monthly cost.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:23 AM
6

while it's a nice gesture, i wish they would spearhead an advertising campaign for prostate / testicular cancer.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:03 AM
0

welcome to feminism, friend.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:30 PM
2

i didn't say they were necessarily bad, just the worst in the thread.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 07:47 AM
2

surprise, another feminazi only sees women as overly sexualized / stereotpyed in games.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:47 AM
2

the problem is it's not optional. you either wear the colors, or you get publicly attacked and ostracized for "hating women" and your career is basically over.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:37 AM
1

and none of the rape "statistics" on posters like these are nationally representative, or representative of reality at all.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:29 AM
1

you're right, it doesn't. i was just trying to equate it to an issue most of us are familiar with for ease of comparison.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:44 AM
2

sporting events are one of the few places it's perfectly normal to hit a girl first, im not sure why your dad thinks otherwise. i had to play against a few girls in lacrosse back in high school. we felt bad hitting them (they were much smaller than us), but if you're going to play the game, expect it to be played to the fullest extent. if you're going to a martial arts competition, expect to get hit.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:55 AM
2

Despite the fact that his ex-girlfriend received a suspended jail sentence for nearly ripping off his testicles with her teeth, Martin Douglas decided to try and patch things up with her. A "chance encounter" in March of this year brought the two former flames to the same wine bar in Newcastle, where they had a "friendly chat," which Maria Topp followed up with a text message to Douglas asking if he still loved her. The father-of-three apparently still had feelings for the mother-of-four who las…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:45 AM
2

yes, but it's not necessarily due to any actual sexism. look at STEM fields, where men greatly, greatly outnumber women, thanks to the fact that women don't go for STEM degrees. a gender gap is not always indicative of bias.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:35 AM
2

unless it's rape. then its better 10 innocent men be punished before 1 guilty man be set free.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:22 AM
3

one of the big reasons i became an MRA. as a longtime lacrosse player and friend of one of the guys who was accused, it absolutely disgusted me how it was handled not only by the police / DA, but by the media. the entire country had already convicted them before it even went to trial.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:21 AM
2

I'd be more worried about my girlfriend getting blackout drunk with a guy at a bar. that's another issue all together. if a man and a woman are both drunk, neither can legally give consent, yet if the woman reports being raped because she couldn't consent, he's a rapist, despite not being able to consent himself.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:19 AM
18

lets be honest, it's anna north, and she cherry picked the worst comments in the thread to write a slander piece. it's nothing new for her. look on the bright side, we'll probably hit 50k members because of that piece. come for the "hatred", stay for the actual help. edit // ROFL. i just noticed what users she used to blanket /mr. two of our most well known "get back in the kitchen" trolls.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:43 AM
1

lets be honest here: it's anna north, and she cherry picked the worst comments in that thread to make a story appeal to kneckbeard whiteknights and feminazis.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:35 AM
1

seems more like a coin toss to me for that. either reddit calls bullshit and the top comment is about how reddit hates women and how this is a real problem, or reddit sucks endlessly at the teat of "you deserve better"ism.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:14 AM
0

why not? it could easily fall into the category of the students being unable to truly consent thanks to her position of power.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:04 AM
3

their age is irrelevant; she's their teacher.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 06:03 AM
10

as "morally bankrupt" the SPLC is, this article was a bit too heavy on the conspiracy theory and a bit too light on hard facts for me to take it seriously.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:27 AM
4

i don't care how i look. god damn it, i spend 2 hours a day getting ready so i can show you how little i care how i look. do you have any idea how hard it is to get the perfect "bed head" look?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:24 AM
2

off topic, i'm deeply dissapointed in your lack of commitment to your username.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:23 AM
7

of course they do, he's a man telling a story on reddit that makes a woman look bad. if the genders were reversed, they would be supporting her the whole way and telling her how she was right.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:22 AM
6

don't forget that they've sued (and won) every cancer foundation that uses the color pink or the ribbon design.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:19 AM
1

47 positive points and zero comments? interesting.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:48 AM
6

so now you want to protect women by covering them? BARBARIC RAPE APOLOGIST
/r/MensRights28/09/12 06:26 AM
7

have they been raped in accordance with a REAL definition of rape? probably not. have they been raped in accordance with the feminist definition of rape? i'm pretty sure everyone on this planet has been.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:18 AM
4

we've been waiting for their invasion since they spammed /r/jailbait with CP to get it shut down. they even promised us!
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:31 AM
20

because she was just showing she was a sexually empowered womyn, you were clearly sizing her up to rape her as soon as she left. /s
/r/MensRights27/09/12 05:22 AM
5

Please don't turn this thread into a giant cirlce jerk about which political theory is better. Noone here really cares if you're a communist, a democrat, an anarcho capitalist, a libertarian, a pirate, etc. One of my favorite sayings goes something like this: "There's two things you don't discuss with friends and at work: politics and religion" edit // not to say we shouldn't discuss decisions made that affect the MRM on the political level, but personal debates on which system is better is quit…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:25 AM
1

while this story is months old, and some of the sites mentioned are no longer banned (the bans truly are temporary, barring the most extreme circumstances, for legitimate domains), the Reddit admins censoring stuff for no reason / trying to hide it is nothing new, and they get quite defensive when charged with it (for instance, during the jailbait purge, numerous legitimate subreddits [some which were text only] were banned and never unbanned, like a fishing reddit, simply because the admins "CT…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 03:17 AM
8

removing sandwich jokes put in by 14 year olds is hardly the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:27 AM
2

ignoring the fact that even if you had detailed reciepts of your daughter's mother using "child support" for anything but the child no court would do anything, what state are you in (i assume NV)? quite a few states allow for the person paying the "child" support to require reciepts to see where their "child" support money is going, and if it's not going to the child they can in theory have the amount reduced, even though i've never seen it happen (anecdote time! : roomate is divorced and lives …
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:09 AM
10

if you have any joint accounts that haven't been frozen, use those funds to get a good lawyer (saw you were worried about legal representation because of lack of money). if the roles were reversed, you can be damn sure you'd be paying for her legal fees in this case, no reason she should get off scott-free here. as was stated in that thread many times, FIND A FATHERS RIGHTS ORGANIZATION IN YOUR STATE. they will know everything you can possibly need to know about getting your kids back and crushi…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 07:03 AM
-3

and in 90% of those threads, the OP posted the picture for attention and for garnering EXACTLY those kinds of remarks.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:09 AM
11

look at freaking "50 shades of grey". women read that EVERYWHERE. and i mean EVERYWHERE, from parks with their kids to the bus to work. if a man was ever caught reading erotica at ANY of those places, he'd be arrested or otherwise in trouble.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 06:08 AM
20

i love how one of the mods was one of the first to post in the thread, and they still claim the mods are inactive.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 04:23 AM
9

it's hard to understand because feminists seem to change the definition of "rape culture" whenever it pleases them.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 10:38 AM
3

i said there was a reason, that looks like a reason to me :P thanks for the info, though, TIL. probably my fault in getting all my info on that subject from an angry essex man.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:09 AM
5

indeed. there's a reason they still use the pound.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:51 AM
3

thereby making them a hategroup. they are overtly / openly extremely, militantly feminist, how can anyone other than white knights and other militant feminists consider them a neutral source?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:47 AM
4

i think he was saying to bait them into throwing the first punch and get it on video (preferably).
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:46 AM
3

im still waiting for the goon squad raid SA promised us :(
/r/MensRights13/09/12 08:32 AM
6

queue Nurdydancing
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:44 PM
14

how is this relevant to mensrights at all? for those of you who don't know tennis that well, it's not uncommon for a complete unknown to beat a major star or two. also, this was done back before V+S were huge stars, and were just breaking into the scene. they talked shit, and the #203 (who was ranked #38 at his peak prior to an injury) stepped up and promptly chinchecked them.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 08:33 AM
1

ive had both, but anecdote time, my friend is a model who bartends, and she makes some damn amazing drinks. i also have a hot friend who could fuck up making a jack + coke, but noone would say anything because of her DDs.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:22 AM
2

this is probably the best explanation on all of reddit about the term, and for that we thank you.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:19 AM
9

any halfway decent lawyer can easily get a prenup thrown out, they are basically useless nowadays. yes, he cheated, but she clearly played the system by waiting for the 10yr mark to get a divorce.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 02:52 PM
1

oh, the OP is almost definitely satirical. i was more trying to point out the comments of "my god RAPE APOLOGY" caliber.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:47 AM
7

you've clearly never been to Turkey.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 02:39 PM
18

california courts are easily the most liberal in the country, and therefor the most "feminist" in the country as well. it's only going to get worse in that state.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:34 PM
1

it's the same way with their copyright violation removal bot. every claim is assumed to be authentic and true, and YOU have to jump thru hoops to get your video unblocked, and most of the time the company / person that claimed the copyright violation can put adds up on the video and make money.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:43 AM
2

so in other words, every time me and the g/f start making out and end up having sex, because i don't explicitly ask her if she wants to have sex i'm a rapist? thats absolutely hilarious. because, by that definition, she's a rapist too. and so is every woman who has sex with a man who doesn't explicitly consent to it.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:53 PM
1

if you're in college, you don't have to go. that doesn't mean they aren't "allowing" them to go, they just aren't forcing them to go because the government isn't forcing them. now, this also brings up the whole issue of income disparity between those entering the military and those who choose not to. i initially joined up because i had no chance at college (great SATs, but don't do well in a normal learning environment) and didn't want to work at mcdonalds while i figured out what to do with my …
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:22 AM
1

keep in mind that a majority of the people replying to that post would never make it to canada. you wouldn't be able to get there via traditional means (boat, plane, car) and they wouldn't last 30minutes in the woods.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 05:21 AM
14

don't forget how everything that hurts men was actually caused by the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 04:00 AM
3

youtube too has a "guilty until proven innocent" thing. ANYONE can claim a copyright violation and has put give no evidence, and can either get your videos taken down or put ads up on them.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 05:05 AM
2

that account is full on troll. trolls trolling trolls, that's all.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 01:19 PM
3

i got lucky there, in that my parents had a very civil divorce. it was a case of "got married too young". no child support, no big custody battles, no alimony, nothing like that. my dad's "child support" was buying me clothes when i needed them, and that was it.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:06 AM
10

i started when i watched a family friend have his life ruined by his wife. she started cheating on him with a guy from work. he didn't want to believe it, but he finally "found out" about a year after it started. they started arguing (verbally) and he stormed out. he came back to the cops on his doorstep. she had claimed he was beating her (never happened). since she had no marks, the cops surprisingly left with just giving him a warning. i was over one day with my mother and the wife starting s…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 05:55 AM
1

ROFL. someone's already blamed the patriarchy for women not being punished for beating men: http://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/xykfz/til_women_were_nearly_twice_as_likely_as_men_to/c5qtpti
/r/MensRights10/08/12 05:19 AM
3

coddling people for triggers is like coddling people with arthritis. yes, it hurts a little, but the more you try and ignore the problem, the worse it gets and the more it hurts when you finally try to confront them. edit // for those who don't know, arthritis gets worse the more sedentary your life becomes. people get into a vicious cycle of "it hurts when i walk too much, so i don't walk, which makes it hurt when i walk too much".
/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:09 AM
12

the bleeding hearts in the thread can bitch about triggers and disorders all they want. the wife is acting completely unreasonable (and im not talking about the lack of sex), and he's not at fault. he's clearly the victim, but of course in reddit's eyes a man can never be the victim, only the woman. being intimate is part of a relationship like that. it's not like he's trying to screw her every time the wind blows.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 04:46 AM
9

Assault is assault, unless the attack is female. then it's up to the officer to decide whether or not it's assault.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:23 AM
10

its gone then. it's pretty obvious that the admins do whatever SRS wants them to do, regardless of evidence / proof.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:10 AM
17

whatever happened to that "wikipedia mod" who posted in /r/mr a few months back asking for more information on stuff like this so he can bring it up and look after it and stuff?
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:09 AM
2

go thru, you'll see them. really don't feel like wading thru that pit of blind hatred again >.<
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:09 PM
15

don't feed the troll.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:23 PM
2

for me, its wikipedia, mensrights.net, and then 3 SPLC hate articles, followed by jezebel and manboobz.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:22 PM
3

made a few posts, be interesting to see if a single one makes it in.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:00 PM
3

the comments are absolutely hilarious. everyone's all for "eye for an eye" until women are on the receiving end.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:53 PM
7

also, since feminists have come out against him being on there, it won't stick. look whats been going on to the MRM wikipedia page. ACTUAL MRM members can't edit it, because there's a couple feminist wiki mods undoing any and all edits that make us looks like something other than wife beaters who want to go back to the 50s.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:44 AM
3

i wouldn't. SPLC is a terrible source to use, as their feminazi bias basically coats everything they do.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:31 AM
1

Why isn't there an article lambasting the women for not breaking traditional gender roles and taking the bullets themselves?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:13 AM
2

this seems to be a reccuring theme. make it impossible to disprove any and all accusations in the world of sexual assault and DV, and i'm honestly getting kind of scared. if i piss of a woman, she has the full power to put me in prison for years and put me on the registry, and there's nothing i can do about it. what the fuck.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:57 AM
26

it was taken down because to a radical feminazi like her, anything or anyone other than a radical feminist woman is fith and doing everything in their power to suppress her. her (and people like her) are so mentall unstable and deluded that they truely believe that woman are at a disadvantage in today's society, and that getting rid of men is the only answer.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:38 AM
1

this has happened before, and she still was able to see the child after that?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:52 AM
3

when an older woman pines for / obtains a much younger man, she's an empowered cougar. when an older man does it, he's a creep looking for arm candy.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:29 AM
5

in maryland, US, it's illegal (it's apparently illegal in quite a few other states here as well) not only for summer camp counselors to assit with the application of sunscreen (male OR female), but it's also illegal to allow a child to assist another child with the application. you have to put it on your child before they go to the camp or else they can't have any that they can't put on themselves.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:28 AM
13

this is the most disturbing part of the story for me: We hired a private investigator, who uncovered many pieces of evidence that proved the accuser wrong. But in a criminal trial with a minor, it's all inadmissible. so in other words, she has carte blanche to make shit up, and there's literally nothing you can do to disprove it because she's a minor.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 03:18 AM
2

if you appreciate music, add some Bikini Kill or Nicki Minaj to your playlists. pretty sure you don't want a woman who has a hit song that is basically nothing but her saying "you a stupid hoe" over and over representing your movement, or someone who fits the "female music star" stereotypes to a T. just sayin.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:56 AM
2

CPS is a joke all around. they openly bully anyone who challenges them, and takes their kids from them (regardless of their gender).
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:48 AM
5

WHO NEEDS A MAP. wait...
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:13 AM
0

in other words, she bit off more than she could chew by starting a fight with an apparent asshole. she got punched in the nose (anyone who's been hit in the nose hard knows how much it bleeds) after slapping the guy. got what she deserved.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 04:02 AM
5

i actually had a really interesting thing pointed out to me about rape culture and how it does exist: look how socially acceptable prison rape jokes are. that's a perfect example of rape culture in action. it may not be the "rape culture" feminists talk about, but it's still rape culture.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 04:46 AM
25

exactly. that's the argument behind basically every rape shield law.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 10:24 AM
26

no, because that might stop rape victims from coming forward when raped! ...
/r/MensRights28/07/12 09:27 AM
14

man, the patriarchy is really holding them down there in the UK.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 07:59 AM
5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_Professional_Football_League
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:33 AM
10

women can and do play sports. they may not be anywhere near as popular as their male counterparts, but they exist (even more so at school levels). there is or has been a pro league for every sport that men play for women. it's not mens fault that noone went to see it. they are paid less because the companies (teams) they work for make much, much less. 90% of the players in the WNBA have better mechanics than anyone in the NBA, but noone watches it. why? because it's not as entertaining to watch …
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:10 AM
3

if lawyers won't do it, it's probably because it's a guarenteed loss.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:05 AM
3

as bad as the story is, this never would have happened had he not ignored the CERTIFIED MAIL he recieved.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 05:01 AM
9

let me know when you find a place that refuses women soley on gender in the US. don't fall back on feminism's usual go-to guy of afghanistan.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:59 AM
6

reddit as a whole has gotten worse over the past ~6 months. in the 4 years i've been here (1 lurking, about to get my 3 year badge), i've never seen so much pitchforking and circlejerking. all it takes to whip up a downvote brigade or other form of hate mob is an easily editable image portraying yourself as the victim and someone popular as the aggressor. look at the whole mc chris situations on /r/gaming (for those who don't know, a TL;DR: nerd rapper mc chris kicked a guy out of his concert fo…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:49 AM
14

i love how the person claiming to have a sister who's afraid of reporting her rape out of fear of punishment is the 2nd most upvoted comment in that thread. interestingly enough, he lives in canada, where theres about a 0 percent chance of a false rape accuser being punished.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:34 AM
2

im sorry if my wording was confusing, it was like 7am when i wrote this. i meant that as in including his pay benefits (and his rank was ambiguous in the article, i assumed the E-6 Sargent, not the E-5 one). pay and benefits alone more than double what i make a month on active duty. it's insane. family sep pay, which he would get, would, judging on his home of record and amount of kids, would add another ~$1.4k a month to his income.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:37 PM
3

i love how everyone is instantly discrediting the article because it's from nigeria.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:28 PM
2

just a correction: unless he severely fucked something up in the military(as in, he was overpayed a fuckton because he didn't fill out a form correctly, so they are taking it out of his paycheck), he's making $2.8k bi monthly, not monthly. also, when he's deployed in a combat zone, all the income is tax free, he makes an extra ~$750 / month in benefits, and an extra ~$1k or MORE in family seperation pay (since he was married w/ kids at the time). yes, the situtation he's in is beyond fucked up, …
/r/MensRights25/07/12 09:50 AM
1

i reported the thread, and commented on it as well. it was NOT a men's right issue. it was something they did out of love, not out of some idea that they HAVE to. i'd do the same for my girlfriend.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:25 AM
4

this is in no way shape or form a men's right issue. at all. i'd gladly die to save my girlfriend's life. why? because i love her. not becuase "it's my role as a man to do it". im 100% certain she'd do the same for me.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 09:47 AM
4

a major first world power is trying to ban the procedure outright, so it's probably piqued a lot of people's attention. upon doing some googling, they find some false / outdated information and accept it as fact, like most of the world does.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 08:48 AM
1

and what country would this be in?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 05:20 AM
2

yet another case of this particular double standard.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:25 PM
4

actual guilt or innocence means next to nothing in these cases, sadly. it becomes more about "who seems more trustworthy" than "who did it".
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:02 AM
7

correct me if im wrong, but a vast majority of the tweets regarding this are from feminists saying tosh should get raped so he won't joke about it anymore.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 05:22 AM
5

the beard and the ink, sadly, probably aren't making things much easier : /
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:03 AM
1

good lucky trying to update it. there's a group of feminist mods at wikipedia that undo everything that might make it seem that the MRM is something other than a bunch of redneck wifebeaters trying to take away a woman's right to vote.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 05:14 AM
12

but it's ok, because girls never lie about rape or sexual assault or anything like that. thats why there is no reason to think about charging false claimers! /s
/r/MensRights17/07/12 03:30 AM
-8

nope. why? her body, her choice. /s
/r/MensRights16/07/12 10:14 AM
12

i wonder if a government would pledge quick action if my religion required FGM on infants, rather than just MGM.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 01:52 PM
5

such a stereotypical feminist: gets confronted with well writen and cited arguements, goes back to the "well, male priviledge exists because i say it does" defense.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 03:23 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/gameoftrolls
/r/MensRights13/07/12 10:07 AM
7

http://www.buzzfeed.com/whitneyjefferson/twitter-divides-in-response-to-daniel-toshs-rape a good amount of twitter comments regarding the "issue" with tosh. no surprise, the only people butthurt about it are feminists, and basically every big-name comedian out there is defending tosh.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:18 AM
7

i love how she tries to just write it off by saying "lol hes mad he cant shut me up". anyone have any links to the articles in question that made the male resign? the article cites a few quotes, but doesn't link anywhere.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:47 AM
16

some didn't care, but most just want to be left alone to their own devices. they leave us alone, i feel that we should do the same. there's no reason to risk stirring something up when GoT is trying it's damndest to do it already (there's atleast 3 games going on atm trying to stir up shit between us and 2xc).
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:29 AM
5

in all reality, they probably don't allow their sons to serve such a patriarchal institution as the military, which openly condones rape as a form of punishment /s
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:27 AM
12

pretty sure 2xc has already asked us not to make posts in there, especially ones that are inevitably going to be crosslinked.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:26 AM
5

the admins only care about what feminists want. getting that subreddit shut down would be like getting SRS shut down: never going to happen. im still waiting for the time we start "posting child porn" like other subreddits that have been shut down "did".
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:48 AM
2

i can see the SRS post now "GUESS WHERE I FOUND MISOGYNISTS PURPOTRATING 'NO MEANS YES'?"
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:44 AM
3

the irony is, that statement itself is an absolute.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:42 AM
1

blame someone for walking into a busy street and getting hit by a car? apologist, it's clearly the driver's fault.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:41 AM
1

it's a screenshot of a conversation between two twitter accounts: Carolyn @reallyhibbs Women's constit: mens rights groups usually attacks on womens rights using language of equality. They're organizing on campuses. #fcee12 Dina Skvirsky @DSkvirsky @reallyhibbs points out "men's equality" groups aren't just a women's issue. they're also homophobic, transphobic + racist #fcee12 #cfsfcee
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:28 AM
13

i believe the point was that there WASN'T one for men as well
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:32 AM
2

to be fair, regarding the searches, the cops normally don't have to worry about a male suing the department for sexual assault after the search.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:09 AM
1

sadly, this is the case. there is literally NO way to distinguish rape from something like rough sex, medically. the bruising and whatnot is all identical. in other words, if you have a crazy girlfriend who's into a lot of kink (not that kink makes you crazy, but that she's crazy to begin with), watch your back.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 04:22 AM
8

i don't think she realizes that a drunk guy who just got kicked in the balls would probably knock her the fuck out. and then proceed to get arrested for assault while she cries to the cops, uncharged for her sexual assault on him.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 04:11 AM
1

while the statement about the media regarding statements against feminism may be techincally correct (the best kind of correct), you can just as easily replace "feminism" with any other main stream / popular idea and the message remains the same. why do you think pretty much all (non-tech) media hates Anonymouse and does whatever they can to villianize them?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 04:02 AM
4

have you ever seen tosh's stand up? he's basically an insult comic. if you give them a target, they ARE GOING TO HIT IT. telling an insult comic that something offends / insults you is like putting a giant bullseye right on your forhead. if she was there, she should have known what his comedy was like, and should have known better.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 03:30 AM
2

don't you know? its because the military allows rapes, and that women in the military who don't get their way would never falsely accuse their superiors of rape when they don't want to play the game anymore!
/r/MensRights11/07/12 09:59 AM
2

this is honestly a great idea for low income areas, like ghettos, where women are more likely to be pressured to drop out of school to be "cool" and whatnot.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 09:55 AM
1

sadly, their "fear" has prompted more and more rash / over-reaching laws like VAWA in the US, and a basic sense of "guilty until proven innocent, then still guilty" mentality when it comes to sex crimes. it's gotten to the point that there doesn't even have to be charges filed for a man's life to be ruined, and even if there are charges filed / jailtime served, the false accuser rarely recieves any form of punishment under the guise of "oh, it will discourage people from coming forward with REAL…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 05:15 AM
2

that's because feminists / white knights just tell everyone we want to put women's rights back the way they were inthe 50s, a woman in every kitchen and a bruise for every "no", and people just accept it. people are so blinded by the past that they don't see that 50 years from now, the roles will be reverse and women will STILL be seen as the perpetual victims of the evil menz. women hold a majority of the voting power, yet complain that there isn't a female president, and blame men/patriarchy f…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 05:12 AM
1

the first half of the article looked pretty promising. then i got to this part: “One in 10 men will be involved in sexual assault in their lifetime,” Bruns said. “1 in 4 women face sexual assault in college.” really? how does one define "involved"? is that just people COMMITING the act, or include male friends of the victims? also, why is there no mention of male victims / female aggressors yet again?
/r/MensRights10/07/12 04:37 AM
9

so by that logic, when women openly control everything and become the percieved priviledged ones, we get to make MGM illegal and get to mandate FGM, right?
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:37 AM
5

but amg there isn't a woman president in the US! it's proof of cisgender white male cispriviledge! you can't disprove it, because you're a cisgener white male with cispriviledge! /s
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:32 AM
1

i think he point was that rape victims usually don't die from the rape. survivor implies that they risked not living because of the rape.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:31 AM
4

i think his point is that like she's saying women can't be sexist, a lot of minorities say minorities can't be racist because they are a minority.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:29 AM
1

welcome to the world. proud to be a man? sexist. proud to be a woman? empowered. proud to be white? racist. proud to be black? enbracing your heritage.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 12:07 PM
4

sadly, it's canada. he'll probably get jailtime because woman can't be the aggressors.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 05:18 AM
4

so now we're just "boys" for playing video games? im sorry, last time i checked, its not 400lb ugly guys with cystic acne saving the perfectly shaped damsel in distress. Yes, the whole thing about the new tomb raider game is beyond fucked up and definately crosses the line, even though it showcases a female heroin. but other than that, the rest of the article just seems like yet another circlejerk about how men jack it to video games.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:11 AM
0

because its run by feminists as a false flag to support their case to get rid of MR. it's only a matter of time before they discover that we've been trading CP (just like jailbait) and shut us down, regardless of the SA thread stating they are going to bomb us with CP and the complete lack of CP beforehand.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:08 AM
6

pretty sure he's still a little sore about the fact that a goon squad openly said they were going to bomb /r/jailbait with child porn, and the instant they started flooding jailbait with CP it was magically noticed by an SRS mod and a reddit admin also happened to be online and just happened to check his messages at the exact moment the subreddit was reported. the admins are all but open about the fact that they are in SA's / SRS's pockets. look at the "bait" subreddit wipe. they CTL+F'd the wor…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:06 AM
1

i doubt it. women can barely get anything from them when they don't hire them strictly because they dont meet their standards for beauty
/r/MensRights04/07/12 01:46 PM
17

this is downright pathetic. a few women (who, for all that is said, could have just been 100% unqualified for the jobs) claim they were discriminated against because of their gender, so BP has to pay $5.4mil? god damn i really wish i could sue hooters becuase they won't hire me as a male waiter.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 01:00 PM
1

you sure about that? my memory is a bit bad, so i went back 11 days in my comment history and nothing from then to now said anything remotely close to what you just described. edit // the one comment i made about 2xc before this was making fun of a circle jerk going on in a thread, 20 days ago. that it?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 04:50 PM
5

im not saying not to contribute. im saying not to make posts bragging about how you went in and showed them how wrong they were. bragging only causes trouble, and we have enough trolls as it is.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 03:26 PM
6

trollxc is the place for 2xc ragecomics since 2xc softbanned them for being posted.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 03:25 PM
4

im not talking about SRS. im talking about 2xC, 2 completely different subreddits with 2 completely different types of subbers.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 03:25 PM
5

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/vxy6p/i_point_out_that_statistics_on_unequal_pay_may_be/ perfect example, regarding 2xC's ragecomic subreddit
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:24 AM
22

there was a specific post today that calls out 2xC by name on the front page of MR that inspired this post, but it's been becoming more and more common as of late that we get posts here with people patting themselves on the back for going into (insert subreddit here) and bragging how they set that subreddit straight. it's fine if you want to go to another subreddit and correct views / offer another PoV / etc, obviously (it IS the internet, after all), there's just no need to come back here and m…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:19 AM
1

another great comparison is the twilight series. thousands upon thousands of middle aged women screaming over barely legal guys in a movie. if the situation was reversed gender-wise, the middle aged men would be seen as pedophiles and laughed at.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:38 AM
15

obviously only works for women.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:51 AM
2

i'd fully understand if some people went in from this thread and bombed the thread with spam and random shit. but we're not SRS, and we tend not to do that.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:03 PM
1

i was going to make a comment about kotaku's monthy misogyny pieces, but then i remembered that they are just Jezebel's gaming wing.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:02 PM
28

on the note of "under attack by feminist groups", i've yet to see a single one call out the fact that every single guy in a video game is perfectly built and in shape, despite decrying that women are portrayed in the exact same light.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:35 PM
10

it's a slur for someone who has aspergers.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:34 PM
18

im sorry, i didn't realize that joining a conversation, posting well thought out, relevant posts, and all around contributing was considered "invading". it's not like we went in there and spammed "LOL 2XC HATES MEN TOO LOL MISANDRY LOLOLOL".
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:33 PM
4

sadly, its become career suicide to NOT support breast cancer awareness month. if you DONT wear pink, you're blasted as a misogynist by every media outlet.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 06:53 AM
10

fight like hell when breast cancer month comes around, imo.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:42 AM
4

so that 4 people can see them?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:45 AM
0

using birth control to treat those issues should be covered. but using it only as a way to avoid pregnancy shouldn't. edit // also, the difference in effectiveness is ~1%, which is assuming that you remember to take the pill every day.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:29 AM
0

as someone else mentioned in reply to one of my posts (might have even been you!), you can get condoms for free just about everywhere in the US. that pretty much eliminates the NEED for bc/tubes to be covered.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:18 AM
1

yes. and the issue here isn't that all these great things were given to women. it's that men were basically ignored by the bill, despite needing the same services.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:05 AM
3

the issue is, the bill covers women getting their tubes tied, which is essentially the female version of a vascectomy (notable difference: AFAIK vascectomy's are reversable, while tubal ligatons are not).
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:04 AM
-2

using birth control for the reasons you listed is completely different than just using the pill over condoms. and getting pregnant is vastly done by choice. if you CHOOSE to get pregnant, that's you game.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:03 AM
6

good luck. i don't know about you, but im pretty sure all posting an image that says something that either paints women in a negative light or attempts to make it seem like women aren't the perpetual victim will be met with nothing but hostility. misandry is perfectly acceptable in today's society.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:01 AM
1

hey guys, i have a great idea. after we go to a feminist website to troll, lets go to 4chan and tell them how great we think internet censorship is!
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:00 AM
2

that's because misogyny has become a catch-all. make a blonde joke? misogynist. make a comment on how that girl from HR is hot? misogynist. post on internet forums on ways to beat women without getting caught? misogynist. only one of those things is a real "hatred for women". i don't know about you, but i think it's pretty obvious which one it is.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:54 AM
1

please explain how explicitly covering a massive amount of procedures / medications for women (specifially, "cosmetic" surgeries like getting your tubes tied, as well as pill-based birth control, on top of support centers for women) while purposely leaving out anything even close to that for men (there was a count made somewhere, something like the word "man/men" is mentioned under 10 times in the bill, while "woman/women" is mentioned over 200 times, to give you an idea.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:52 AM
1

i think those kinds of things should be covered, but they need to be covered regardless of your gender (or lack therof, for those who don't identify with a binary), not just solely for women.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:50 AM
2

silly menz, women paying more for anything is misogyny hands down. you dumb neckbeards need to just figure that out from your throne on the pillar of priviledge. /s
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:49 AM
3

the point is this: things like tubal ligations, birth control, cancer screenings, etc are all covered FOR WOMEN. vascectomy (spelling? im horrid), condoms, cancer screenings, etc are NOT COVERED for men (i believe prostate cancer alone gets covered after you are 40, however a 22 year old woman can get a mamogram any time she wants under this bill).
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:48 AM
3

i still love the this. since men apparently cause more accidents per mile than women, it's 100% ok for the company to charge them more for insurance simply because they are male. however, when insurance companies want to charge women more than men because they are more likely to use their insurance, its 100% illegal. wat.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:45 AM
1

prostate cancer isn't sexy and chic like breast cancer. there's no month for it, no color for it, not even a lame facebook status sexual innuendo for it. why put money into prostate cancer when you can put it into breast cancer and be seen as a crusader over a neckbeard? despite the fact that the diagnosis and death rate are virtually equal for breast cancer and prostate cancer, prostate cancer reasearch is outfunded by breast cancer research by atleast 4 to 1 (fear not, citations incoming). TL;…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:44 AM
1

what are the health risks of not getting your tubes tied or not taking the pill?
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:41 AM
2

i think what he's implying is that, while you might not find it sexually stimulating, someone else might; and things you find sexually stimulating out of "the norm", someone else might find to be "wrong".
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:38 AM
9

i dont know why there would be an end to equal prize money. it's pretty common for women to work less than men and to still demand the same pay.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 03:35 AM
1

this has been posted before, a few months back, and it was met with equal hostility from men and women.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:05 AM
0

gotta love the everpresent 1 in 4 statistic.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:03 AM
-1

ever seen TheDirty? it does the same thing, to women, and 100x worse. just because this exists and you aren't looking for people condemning it doesn't mean they aren't there, especially on reddit.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 10:23 AM
5

AFAIK, and my experience (as a male) is a little limited, but last time i checked not too many people get raped at victoria's secret, so it's not exactly a high risk zone.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:15 AM
8

aye. and the only people we ban are obvious trolls, like people who've made numerous comments about how they should be able to beat their wives, or how everyone subscribed to this subreddit is a rapist / rape-aplogist / misogynist pig male WOMYNFORLYFE
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:12 AM
5

apparently having the posibility of removing a man's ability to procreate is a fitting punishment for being drunk in public.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 08:40 AM
2

how the official gets to retire with benefits and wasn't fired is beyond me.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 05:14 AM
18

not if he wanted to stay off the sex offenders registry.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 11:05 AM
5

the circlejerk going on in that thread is one of the biggest i've seen on reddit.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 09:57 AM
4

Sadly, this is nothing new for Canada. It's not surprising that you encountered a "guilty until proven innocent, then mostly still guilty" rule of women accusing men in Canada.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 09:47 AM
1

or his savings account was in his name only, not joint.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:42 AM
5

and the prison system in the UK is amazingly lenient on female offenders. im honestly surprised she got time at all.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 09:55 AM
3

26 weeks for this. thats hilarious. she destroyed lives and she'll spend maybe 1/2 of her time in jail, if any at all.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 09:26 AM
2

and i bet it's vaguely worded enough so that if you discriminate while using the policy they can say it's left up to the judgement of the school administration as to who they pat down.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 03:37 AM
1

good luck getting a woman tried under the UCMJ for rape / sexual assault. every single piece of SA/Rape literature / powerpoint / etc that exists in the military shows males as the sole aggressors.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 09:32 AM
1

where is it going on? i didn't catch that. :P
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:46 AM
1

good luck. when we tried to fix it (fulfilling every inane requirement set out before us), multiple admins / big time editors, all with feminist badges of pride on their user pages, took it all down and said it wasn't properly cited and whatnot. i doubt you have the pull to undo all that. edit // another note: when the feminist bombing of the page happened, it stuck (everything they added was either uncited or cited to a BLOG with obvious bias, which im told is a 'no-no' for wikipedia citing). w…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:41 AM
1

I would just like to point out that in cases like this, it's almost NEVER the performer's doing. its the venue trying to bring in more women.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:36 AM
2

As much as people like to point out how over-sexualized women are in video games (and they are) and how women in video games are always "perfect", when was the last time you saw a fat man with acne as the main character, not some perfectly sculpted Adonis as the main character?
/r/MensRights10/06/12 05:43 AM
1

i've never understood how this was rape when they were BOTH drinking, based on the grounds that she was too intoxicated to give consent. so was he.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 09:51 AM
4

boys are taught from an early age to treat every girl like a princess. girls are taught from an early age that they are all special snowflakes who deserve nothing but their own personal prince to wait on them hand and foot. basically, if you're a guy, you have to do everything the girl wants to keep her, or else you're clearly not worthy of her.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 09:27 AM
2

until the bot wakes up: I was checking out /r/okcupid, because I'm a single guy and stumbled on this post: In a difficult spot, went on a couple dates with a guy from OkC, things are going great, he doesn't know I'm non-op mtf. Help! In the post the poster talks about getting intimate with the guy without telling him that she is a he. This has just been nagging at me since reading it. I don't want to use the rape word, but it feels wrong, is there any legal protection in these situations?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:17 AM
4

don't you know? on reddit, that doesn't matter! equality only counts when it doesn't involve a woman giving up her female priviledges!
/r/MensRights08/06/12 05:13 AM
8

from everything i hear about Canadian courts, they make the 9th circuit look like republicans.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:33 AM
1

I understand the reasoning behind it, i was just clarifying that a majority of women who serve want it gone.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:28 AM
2

to be fair for the combat exclusion policy, every single woman i serve with and have ever met in the military wants it done away with, as well as differing PT test score requirements (in the air force, as a female, you can basically walk the mile and a half distance and still pass)
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:23 PM
2

ADD/ADHD were the go-to diagnosis for ~ 2 decades, if not more so. Aspergers is only just really makings its way on to the scene (in regards to being used as an excuse).
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:04 PM
5

so it's become the ADD / Aspergers of people over the age of 18? edit // not to imply ADD / Aspergers aren't real, they were/are the go-to diagnosis for lazy parents who want an excuse as to why little timmy isn't the start quarterback like his daddy was, and would rather play video games.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 06:30 AM
0

who's to say they weren't? it's been a more and more common occurrence to falsely accuse athletes (from the pros to high school) of raping them because of how much damage it does, and for life. the burdon of proof in every other criminal case rests with the prosecution, with the exception of rape. no longer does a woman have to prove you raped her, but you have to prove you didn't.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 03:39 AM
1

your comment shows the problem perfectly. when it comes to rape, the burden isn't on the prosecution anymore. its on the defense. they don't have to prove you did it, you have to prove you DIDN'T do it.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 03:19 AM
2

for those too lazy to read or just don't know, the US had an economic stranglehold on Japan at the time (Japan was HEAVILY reliant on imports) and breaking the US Navy's hold on the pacific was the only way Japan would have survived economically.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:58 PM
2

then why isn't it ok (or legal in a lot of places) to do the same for health insurance, where women cost the company more than men?
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:25 PM
2

the problem is, when it comes to health insurance where woman are the opposite of men (men use their car insurance more than women, women use their health insurance more than men), any difference in premium is a guaranteed lawsuit. you CAN'T charge a woman more than a man for health insurance (assuming equal health, age, etc). it's illegal here in the states. yet no congressman seems to care when it comes to car insurance.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 05:23 PM
1

did you even read the story? he wasn't any more athletic than the girls.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 01:01 PM
1

that's sort of the point a lot of people are making. it's like allowing a girl on a high school football team. she's going to be at a severe disadvantage physically and most likely be an injury liability. but you CAN'T stop her from playing. just like they shouldn't be able to stop HIM from playing field hockey.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 02:48 PM
3

if its a sport that men tend not to play, thus making a majority of the players female, its a female-dominated sport......
/r/MensRights27/04/12 12:03 AM
4

they don't. they know they don't. but they have one rather large superweapon up their sleeves at all time: misogyny. any time someone calls them on their bullshit they run around screaming MISOGYNIST OMG YOU HATE WOMEN YOU WANT TO RAPE ME ARREST HIM and the focus shifts from the fact that feminists openly lie to get policy changes to the fact that all men are rapist pigs who can only think with their dicks (/s).
/r/MensRights25/04/12 02:33 AM
4

so it does. last paragraph: Anyone who wants to be president of the United States shouldn't have to think about whether hardworking, responsible middle-class families deserve the opportunity to succeed. We know all too well what it's like to hear silence when we fight for fairness -- and we've heard enough
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:05 PM
3

oppinion
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:04 PM
3

that is the entire article, i just omited the "editors note" and "follow us on twitter!" stuff. editor's note: Lilly Ledbetter is the co-author of "Grace and Grit: My Fight for Equal Pay and Fairness at Goodyear and Beyond" (Crown Archetype). She has campaigned and raised funds for President Barack Obama.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:50 PM
21

aye, but this one is a bit nicer on the english-reading eyes.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:54 PM
2

the "yokel" in question who wrote it posted a link to it on his facebook that was circulating around here. his facebook also contained countless links to posts / articles on radfemhub.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:47 PM
-1

you continue to prove my point about your reading comprehension skills. this is hilarious
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:44 PM
-1

you still haven't gone back and reread my post have you. i wasn't arguing with you with that statement. i was merely stating a fact about you, one that you continue to prove.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:37 PM
-3

PS learn to read my entire comment so you can see that there is quite clearly a "/s" at the end of the first part. fucking morons.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:30 PM
10

you stupid misogynists, that will stop women who were REALLY raped from coming forward in fear of being prosecuted if there isn't enough evidence to show they were raped! /s even though the definition of rape is so horrifically broad and shady she basically has to admit to not being raped. 18 people missed the "/s" indicating the statement before it was sarcasm : /
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:18 PM
51

except when you accuse a man of rape, his name is plastered on everything there is concerning the story.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:17 PM
1

i should clarify my comment as to be pertaining to rich celebrities with gold digger wives.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:02 AM
2

Oh, well, my new BMW is for the kids so they can have the most comfortable ride during this harsh transitional period. Also, the $3k i spent on my nails and hair were so the kids could be proud of their mommy and not be embarrassed in school about their mother.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:10 PM
1

so that would be what, ~$700/month? good luck finding someone paying only $700 a month nowadays
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:09 PM
1

im pretty sure only 4 of us caught your sarcasm : /
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:08 PM
-2

save the money then. just because you get the money doesn't mean you have to spend it. unless they are getting sick weekly, in which case the custodial parent better not have custody much longer.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:07 PM
1

well, according to radical black movements (like radical feminist movements), you ARE contributing to the KKK just for being white.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:57 PM
5

im not quite sure how you need feminism to be a man. i don't consider standing up for equal rights to automatically make you pro feminism, because feminism hasn't been about equal rights in decades.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:58 PM
3

Inconceivable!
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:36 AM
8

the comment, if anyone is wondering. http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/rulc8/why_is_it_that_in_america_male_rape_isnt_taken/c48swyv
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:03 AM
12

and they wonder why everyone makes fun of them for being white knights.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 12:21 AM
13

No, that's about right for American laws as well: can't name female defendants, and can't give them real jail time either.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 06:41 PM
14

Feminist calling the porn industry a rape industry is nothing new. It's not like the porn stars are paid for the job they voluntarily chose to do or anything like that.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 06:24 PM
0

can't believe people are taking a "cracked" article seriously. thats like citing the onion.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 06:19 PM
1

just look at the record. everything that the SRS/SA crew (i misspoke with 2x, ill edit that to SA in a second, my apologies to any 2x people who read that before the edit goes thru) has wanted and tried to get banned has gotten banned. they flood subreddits with child porn then report them, with the subreddits being taken down basically without question.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 03:41 AM
2

you seem to underestimate how deep in the pockets of SA / SRS the admins are.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 03:31 AM
1

implication is more than enough these days.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 03:30 AM
1

there was zero evidence of ANY child porn in /jailbait until the SRS/SA squads came in posting it. within minutes of it being posted a SRS mod magically saw it somehow despite never viewing such a vile subreddit and reported it to the admins, who also magically happened to be online at that time and shut it down.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 03:28 AM
3

Inc slap on the wrist with no jail time.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 05:56 PM
1

the admins have made it quite clear they will do SRS/SA's bidding at the drop of a hat, so "warning" the admins doesn't mean much.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 08:36 PM
1

i welcome the doxing, im curious to what they can find on me
/r/MensRights18/03/12 08:36 PM
2

Now if only the admins would stop caving to their every whim.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:29 PM
5

I am a bit torn in my opinion of this particular issue. On the one hand, I genuinely feel that conservatives in this country really do seem to have it out for women when it comes to reproductive rights. Hillary Clinton said it best in an earlier post: "Why extremists always focus on women remains a mystery to me. But they all seem to. It doesn‘t matter what country they’re in or what religion they claim. They all want to control women,” Now I am a very dedicated mens rights advocate, but I think…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:45 AM
7

as a sub-25 year old male with ZERO tickets / accidents, i pay $40 more a month than my female friend with 2 at-fault accidents and multiple speeding tickets (both of us are on our own insurance plans). i even drive a "safer" car (2 airbags as opposed to her driver-only, alarm system, etc).
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:30 AM
13

the same thing happens when a porn star woman turned prospective teacher is found out. this isn't just a "men" thing.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 10:00 PM
1

yes, you will. now, PROVING that you knew is a whole different thing.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:25 PM
2

the fact that they didn't enter is completely irrelevant. if you help someone murder someone, you get charged with murder. if you help someone steal something, you get charged as well.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 04:47 PM
5

she wasn't "allegedly" anything anymore. when you lie and lie and lie to the cops about the same story (from rape to attempted rape to a forced blowjob to an attempted forced blowjob) you lose all credibility. sorry, DSK is 100% innocent at this point.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 02:47 AM
9

but hey guise, women don't lie about rape, and when they do, there's no reason to think that they would do it again (RE: her lying about being raped to get political asylum in the US)
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:59 PM
1

the marmoset memes on that tumblr.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 04:23 AM
6

the first part was sarcastic, as denoted by the caps lock. the 2nd part was pointing out that so called "extremist" feminists are the ones making the laws.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 03:40 AM
6

one of them is about the girl who faked being raped and put reddit all in a white knight tizzy because people called her on the moving bruise.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:55 AM
3

it's not an exaggeration at all. guy i know just spend 90 days in jail for pushing his GF into a wall after she stabbed him with scissors. she got no jail time because "she had to care for their [2 year old] child"
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:47 AM
22

it only applies to cute females, for the most part. and before this gets twisted into some form of misogyny on my part, i mean gamestop hiring practices. if you ever look, 90% of the females who work at gamestop are atleast "cute" by a normal standard, and usually have little to no actual video game experience / knowledge.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:45 AM
0

BUT OMG GUYS NOT ALL FEMINISTS ARE LIKE THAT JUST THE EXTREMIST ONES. you know, the ones in the proper social / political positions to influence policies designed to uplift woman and downgrade men.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:41 AM
3

ITS OK GUYS FALSE RAPE ACCUSERS DON'T NEED HARSHER PUNISHMENTS // MANDATORY SENTENCES!
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:04 PM
-1

whats that? a feminist group that relies on misinformation? LIES.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:13 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/comments/q9db8/in_the_fifth_false_rape_accusation_thread_in/c3vt925 stay classy yourself. hilariously enough, your own mentally impaired friends downvoted you into oblivion.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:42 PM
6

that's funny, because plenty of us get threatening PMs from SRS soldiers all the time, yet its always "the minority" of feminists who do stuff like that. so now you think that a few people, who for all we know are just SRS trolls anyways, represent the MR community? grow up
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:40 PM
6

me neither. the general theme of the thread is "it might impair actual rape cases, so fuck the people who are victims of false rape charges". I understand not wanting to put actual rape charges at risk, but for that minority of cases (mainly, the ones where there might not be enough evidence to show a rape occured), false rape accusation punishment shouldn't be thrown aside. sure, all the claims of "false police report charges should be made more serious" are nice and all, but the fact is a good…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:03 AM
-5

welcome to the jungle, i guess. edit // some context for this: the area right off the aptly named "rape trail" is called the jungle, one of the places where a good amount of the assaults take place.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 10:07 PM
13

i live near uconn. its hilarious how offensively discriminatory towards men the entire campus is. if you aren't a feminist white knight, you're a rapist. any time a feminist group protests something, they get air time on UCTV, and usually get a nice spread in the campus paper. there was a group of men protesting the inequality in the campuses "date rape" policy, among other things. they were counterprotested by feminazis claiming they were rape supporters / rape sympathizers / rape culture suppo…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:32 PM
5

you get all your information from a clearly neutral source. be right back, im going to get statistics on misogyny from SRS.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 06:05 PM
1

that's funny, because for the rest of the world, a few bad apples is more than enough of a reason to create laws / foster hatred. see: cops or any feminist organization's teachings.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:24 PM
27

as a fellow military man, i know your pain. the countless training powerpoints about sexual harassment / misconduct are clearly aimed at men (ie, the antagonists are almost exclusively men), nevermind the yearly rape brief, where its a group of drunk guys cornering some poor defenseless female outside of a bar and raping her, or 4 guys raping a guy in a tent for not being a team player. i was actually verbally warned by a superior when i asked why its always men who are the rapists in these vide…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:22 PM
5

i know a lot of people in the same world, and they say the exact opposite, because of how sue-happy people are these days.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:10 PM
73

i prefer the "Complains about lack of female CEOS; has degree in art history" one for this meme.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:04 PM
5

facts have never mattered when it comes to programs / charities revolving around women.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:39 PM
6

the comments section is saddening, especially sunechirei's comments about how female on male DV is never very bad or severe.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 12:27 AM
1

not hating on patrick stewart, hating on the idea he's promoting. when feminism becomes about equality again, rather than giving woman everything they want because, you know, at some point in time they were persecuted, at the expense of men, ill stop thinking feminism is a sexist joke.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:50 PM
6

It's all about how the whole world is out to get the poor lil womanz and how the big evil strong men sit in their ivory towers of pure privilege and abuse their infinite benefits of being male to keep the benefit less woman in check and below the man. also, it's about how every comment made that about women that isn't praise is misogyny.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 08:34 AM
2

been to SRS i see.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 08:10 AM
-2

i'm not quite sure how SRS is still even a subreddit. disabling the downvote arrow (or upvote arrow) is against reddit's subreddit rules. has noone else reported it?
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:19 AM
5

she's saying society is to blame, that we aren't encouraging women enough, because, you know, there isn't countless programs for the advancement of woman / laws that basically require that you hire a certain amount of woman or risk being sued for gender bias. she's blaming the imaginary patriarchy, ie men.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:35 PM
4

i was tempted to stop watching once i heard "we have equality nowhere". "we say we want to educate our girls as much as our boys, but we don't mean it" - i guess the fact that women are more likely to graduate (both high school and college) is just a random coincidence? Yes, keep blaming men for keeping the poor woman down. It's clearly the evil menz fault for woman not wanting to put in the effort to become a CEO. Bossy? Boy's are dicks / assholes. Women are just being empowered. I would really…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:43 PM
15

in feminism they do. if one woman can take a normally useless degree and turn it into a 6 figure salary, every woman can. and if they don't, it's a clear case of misogyny.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:58 PM
2

of course not, because feminism isn't about equality.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:43 PM
9

she's an RL friend, we've had many a spirited debate on many topics, but she's pretty cool and we know not to go too far with each other, for the most part. me? no. i firmly believe SA is just a website that puts /r/circlejerk to shame.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:19 AM
15

you should know by now that it's ok if violence happens to men for any reason in any form of media because, you know, it's clearly joking. but god fucking help you if you so much as say a mean word in a commercial towards a woman.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:16 AM
28

feminists already claiming victory: http://imgur.com/C2uzc just waiting for a SA goon squad to come in here and post CP so that reddit admins can shut us down too, and watch as some white knight from SRS claims he was responsible for it.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:11 AM
1

so in other words, since it doesnt show women to be the saviors of all mankind, its misogyny and sexism? lol. go back to your woman's studies class at community college.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:47 PM
2

you feel self entitled because you aren't religious and feel you're better than those who are. it's a cirlce jerk because you refuse to see that any other viewpoint but your own may be valid.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:39 AM
3

its also almost completely unmoderated, and a humungous circlejerk.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 09:14 PM
-1

feminism hasn't been about equality in over a decade.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:39 PM
2

its one of the most heavily moderated subreddits, interestingly enough. i'v never quite understood why a subreddit needs 20+ mods like srs, feminisim, 2xc, etc have, yet vastly larger subreddits have much less. /r/starcraft has 5 mods for ~80k subs, SRS has 4x that amount for 1/8th the subs. clearly not karma whoring / white knighting for the poor helpless females (/s, btw, before srs comes in and calls me a misogynist).
/r/MensRights29/01/12 05:38 PM
6

its a common tone with her, honestly. i read it in the bathroom while doing my business, and she's regularly giving advice like this.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:40 AM
2

just responding to one point: a vast majority of the items in the "checklist" are completely false or severely outdated. 1,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17(barely so, its been changing the past few years),18,20,21,22,23,24,26 (to a point, anything over $200 is about the same),28,29,30,31,32(yes, cite phrases that are hundreds of years old more, please),35, <36/37 shouldn't even be on there, religion has been irrational and a joke since its inception>,38,39,40,41,42,43!,45,46,47 some of them are …
/r/MensRights15/01/12 08:12 PM
18

But i thought women never lied about being raped! /s
/r/MensRights14/01/12 09:57 PM
18

this is so remarkably similar to what happened to a family friend of mine. they used to argue, she'd hit him a few times (open hand and closed fist) and he'd leave. she would then call the cops on him and he's almost been arrested 3 times because of this. she got tired of him not getting arrested and she started hitting herself, slamming her hand in doorways, etc when he'd leave, so when she'd call the cops they'd have to arrest him. well, it worked. he spent a week in jail until they figured ou…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:59 PM
1

hardly discrimination against someone with disabilities, unless of course he's actually retarded, which i doubt. you see, in today's society, it's pretty much OK to refer to someone as "retarded" as long as they are not in fact retarded. its kind of like how black people say nigger all the time. it's only derogatory when you intend it to be.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 03:36 AM
16

man, 3 comments from a single person really shows how transphobic the MR community is. retard.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 08:06 PM
3

blame the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:00 PM
2

i also love how they rushed to the "transphobic" label, and looked right past the gender-related satire of today's society regarding men and women.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:07 AM
1

that's funny. when some misandric makeup artist painted on a bruise, you feminazi's went into a tizzy, despite the bruise moving around her face and other mounting evidence she was full of shit.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:03 AM
4

it wasn't taken down because of the content of the posts. a SomethingAweful goon squad came in, made accounts, and spamming a jailbait thread begging for (and linking to) CP. that's what ended jailbait. im sure, however, that the admins were just looking for an excuse anyways, and the SA goon squad gave it to them.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 01:40 AM
4

seriously. he didn't invent or create shit. he merely reskinned other people's creations, put an "i" in front of them, and marked them up a thousand dollars.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 02:47 AM
2

i'm sure that there are soldiers who don't want women in the front lines, just like there are soldiers who don't want a black president, who think gays shouldn't serve, etc. sure, they are out there, but i highly doubt they are even close to a majority.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 08:12 PM
3

As a soldier, I disagree :/
/r/MensRights13/12/11 04:00 PM
17

most people don't have an opinion worth analyzing fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:44 AM
8

in that case, it's not that they don't want to, it's that the military (US Military, atleast, i know most other countries allow it) won't let them.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:43 AM
1

but...but... girls don't lie about being raped! if they say there were raped, they were raped! /s
/r/MensRights13/12/11 03:00 AM
0

because if you stand up for yourself, you're permanently labeled a creepy, misogynistic racist. proud to be a woman? empowering. proud to be a man? sexist. proud to be black? heritage. proud to be white? racist.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 01:02 AM
-3

hardly. while there is a good amount of circlejerking here as well, there's also a good amount of somewhat balenced discussion about issues and events. those two subreddits are literally OMG YOUR MALE YOU DESERVE TO DIE ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS 9/10 WOMEN GET RAPED EVERY HOUR
/r/MensRights05/12/11 11:44 PM
8

please don't suggest /feminism or /feminisms. both just circlejerk about how the patriarchy is evil and how women should rule the world, all while addressing no real issues.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 08:30 PM
19

in the US, if you have AIDS and dont tell a sexual partner who then contracts it, you can get arrested for attempted murder.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:13 PM
-1

hundred dollar minimum ticket prices makes their numbers highly deceptive. thats like saying that michael jackson is today's most popular pop singer because of how much music he sold when he died.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 04:41 AM
1

i wonder what you use as a metric for "biggest band on the planet" and "biggest tour in history". if you think that U2's popularity is 1/2 of what it was a decade or so ago, you're blind.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 03:21 AM
0

i wasn't aware that Bono was the only member of U2.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:32 AM
0

its bono. he does this shit to keep extending his 15 minutes of fame.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 01:16 AM
3

his frequent posting to /r/Christianity seems to serve no purpose other than to piss off the regular members of that subreddit, as well as his posts in other /r/AskReddit threads. sadly, troll or not (the misandry post gave it away for me), a lot of people think like him / her : /
/r/MensRights01/12/11 09:27 PM
9

all by one person who, after looking thru their comment history (outside of their CFB posts), was clearly trolling you.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 09:16 PM
8

if you EXPECT anything (outside of loyalty and love) in a relationship, you're doing it wrong imo. getting the extras (like random flowers, your favorite soda / candy bar, etc) is why you should enjoy STAYING in a relationship. those things shouldn't be ground rules for one.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 07:37 PM
10

its jezebel. its not surprising at all.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 10:20 PM
2

they forgot to put "you can be held liable for child support" on that list.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 04:20 PM
6

i never studied, never "prepped" for the SAT. it was all basic shit you should know by your junior / senior year in HS.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:26 PM
2

ofcourse.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:25 PM
6

no book will help with that tho : /
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:56 PM
3

i hear women don't have access to the same calculators that men do, which trivialize the math portion if you can remember the formulae.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:22 PM
7

you don't need the SAT books. they really don't help much. if you pay attention in your classes (and aren't in the low level classes) you'll do just fine.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:22 PM
27

no need for the /s there, because that's how most of the country thinks. its become socially acceptable to believe that women are smarter than men when they do better, but if a man does better its because the system is biased against women / patriarchy / sexism / etc.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:21 PM
15

inc wall of text: “High school grades are the single most powerful predictor of college performance,” he said. “High SAT scores over-predict how well a student is going to do in college, and they’re inversely related to academic engagement.” False. 100x over false. High school nowadays is all about preparing for taking tests, thanks to the No Child Left Behind Act. I damn near flunked out of high school, yet hold a 3.6 GPA in my college. I also did amazing on my SAT. High school not only doesn't…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:19 PM
1

if i could be guarenteed without a shadow of a doubt that the money would be used on the children (and not go the way of wellfare, food stamps, and child support), i would have no issue with taxpayer money going to stay at home moms. i just refuse to have my money go to a stay at home mom who then spends it on makeup and purses while her kid is in 3rd generation hand me downs.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 02:33 AM
1

but..but... cops not giving tickets to women is false and from the 80s!
/r/MensRights08/11/11 09:37 PM
1

men DO get breast cancer, and kidney stones pain, from what i've heard on all accounts, >>>> birth pain, for the most part.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 02:26 PM
2

women have their own goddamn month and color to go along with it too.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 02:26 PM
4

i still find it hilarious that most women i ask firmly believe that if a woman is sober and the man is drunk, there is no way it is even close to rape. but if both parties are drunk, then it is definately the man raping the woman. sigh.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 04:49 AM
2

you have no idea. i mean literally no idea. how hard it is for me to not going into full on troll mode and have that girl in tears within the hour.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 04:42 AM
8

O.H. probably would have been better, im sure im not the only one who read it as "ohio"
/r/MensRights08/11/11 04:39 AM
0

they are all either fat, ugly, or both?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 11:17 PM
13

i don't see an issue here. growing up with a strong female roll model who can do things for herself is better for you over idolizing a weak, frail, empty excuse for a human (if you've ever read the books, meyer goes into VERY little detail describing bella, but you could literally fill another book with her descriptions of edward).
/r/MensRights07/11/11 11:00 PM
1

i wasn't aware that 2 women could create a child.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 10:19 PM
0

where's the one telling women not to cry rape when they realize the guy they had sex with was uglier than they thought?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 10:17 PM
3

i still don't understand how "gender studies" is a subject. atleast when it was called "woman's studies" it was a descriptive title. gender studies implies that its not a class full of misandric drivel about how the big bad men are only here to keep a good girl down. oh, and how all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 01:09 AM
1

ive never understood why all the blame in an abusive relationship is layed on the abuser. yes, its his / her fault for being abusive. but its your fault for staying with them.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 10:18 PM
9

tumblr i think i just answered your question for you.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 03:40 AM
1

yeah, i think alot of people missed the sarcasm. either that, or the r/feminism downvote brigade is out and about.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 02:40 AM
2

the point here is, if it was a woman asking for the money, she would hands down get it.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 02:39 AM
1

i dont understand how she was entitled to ANYTHING when they had been divorced for 10 years. its not like he won the lottery while they were married. the fact that he was willing to give her some as a gift says alot about him, and the fact that she refused to put what she got into a trust for the kid says alot about her.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 02:38 AM
13

it is, but the satire comes from common feminist rants.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 02:36 AM
2

coincidence? was never good at that xD
/r/MensRights17/10/11 07:36 PM
5

PHD in drama. irony.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 01:50 AM
13

fun fact: more men die each year due to prostate cancer than women do to breast cancer. (source: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-026238.pdf) yet we have a whole month of "OMG BREAST CANCER AWARENESS" where i have to see everyone in every aspect of my life wearing "pink for the cause". the "cause", btw, is copyrighted by susan g komen, and using the color pink, or the ribbon, in any way related to cancer outside of breast cancer, opens yo…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 06:35 PM
14

i read that until i saw the "wage gap" and "pink collar jobs" comments were in the same sentence, and promptly closed that propagandist drivel.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 04:02 PM
0

sign a prenup.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:01 PM
5

i only skimmed it because he should have known better than to engage in such a relationship, but as long as she didn't use the relationship to get out of her minor troubles, i see nothing wrong with what she did. the exact same thing would happen (and DOES happen) if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 09:47 PM
6

you should know by now that your karma whoring self is just going to get downvoted into oblivion here. byebye.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 08:46 PM
-1

big surprise. one line in a comic filled with countless other well written, valid points (in a part explained to be mean by the author him/herself) and its bigoted against gays? lol.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 07:36 PM
1

in other words, fake ID's >>> you.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 08:49 PM
3

5 year (effectively) sentance for a beating that could have easily been tried as a hate crime? lol. thats as much of an insult as her getting off without a sentance.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 02:21 AM
1

a majority of this subreddit's discussion is based on US laws. its like going to /r/politics and expecting world politics
/r/MensRights16/09/11 01:46 AM
2

im not going to take the time to search for the exact law, but if a woman says "no" at any point and you don't stop, its rape. she can consent until 10 minutes into it, say no, and if you don't pull out that second you're raping her.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 01:44 AM
36

according to law, if a woman says no, but then has sex (including her being on top) you raped her.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 10:55 PM
-1

it doesnt matter if the man has had something to drink. the woman's consent is the only one that matters to the law.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:58 PM
5

man you looked really, really hard
/r/MensRights14/09/11 08:20 AM
1

more men get prostate cancer than women get breast cancer. and thats including the count of "2" for cancer in both breasts. it would be even higher if we had 2 prostates.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:34 PM
0

no, she quite clearly said rape in quite a few posts that im sure 2xc has "moderated"
/r/MensRights13/09/11 04:54 AM
-2

there is still a HUGE FUCKING DIFFERENCE between getting raped and getting beat up. she was the one claiming she got raped (and later changed her story to assault). we called her bullshit, so we're the badguys? stay classy reddit: girl lies about being raped, call the people who call her bluff assholes. its people like her who are hurting the cases of people who are ACTUALLY raped.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 11:09 PM
-1

there is a huge, huge difference between an assault and a rape.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 10:30 PM
-2

so she lied about being raped, and edited her statement after the story exploded. still not sure why any apology is owed at all, seeing as how we were calling her out for lying about being RAPED.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 08:26 PM
-19

im confused why any apology is neccessary? from what i've read, made a post about her getting raped, complete with "bruise" picture, then admitted she wasn't raped.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 04:58 AM
2

times have changed. not 10 years ago i was getting my ass beat by my parents. never once did i think "oh man, im telling someone about this!". nowadays, if you so much as spank your kid and someone finds out, you lose your kid.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 08:38 PM
1

your extensive posting history in /r/femenism, in combination with this post, confuses me.
/r/MensRights04/09/11 10:00 PM
3

thats like saying communism is about equality. sure, its great in theory, but in practice its anything but.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 05:04 AM
8

tell the lazy parasite to get a job.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 01:12 AM
8

feminism hasnt been about independence and empowerment for years. its about destroying men.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 01:11 AM
1

according to feminism, you beat her and raped her. evidence not required. you are a male, therefor you are in the wrong.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 07:53 PM
1

it is when you're lying about your immigration status is directly related to lying about being raped in your home country. she was granted political asylum because she said she was raped by soldiers.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:46 PM
1

please explain to me why not. please explain to me why someone who has a history of lying about being raped is being taken seriously at all when she has changed her story at least 3 times in this case (especially now that the charges are gone)?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:58 AM
2

so you're saying the fact that the only reason she's in this country, a complete and utter rape LIE, isn't a reason to send her back?
/r/MensRights23/08/11 02:20 AM
7

if they can prove she lied on her political asylum case, can't we deport her ass? also, inc civil suit from the dirtbag maid.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 06:06 PM
0

mmk. TIL <3
/r/MensRights20/08/11 05:46 PM
24

TIL that when both parties are drunk beyond being able to give consent, only the woman is raped.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:47 PM
0

vaginal bruising alone should clear his name. it appears in one part of the vagina for non consensual / rape sex, and another completely different area for consensual sex. top or bottom, iirc, but don't quote xD. if it was, in fact, a consensual drunken hookup, the rape kit will show it as such. if it was actual rape, the rape kit will show it as such.
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:47 PM
3

I can tell you, with full certainty, that neither the Marines or Army are currently participating in, nor have been since (at the latest) the start of 2011, the stop loss program.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 11:46 PM
2

stop loss hasn't been in effect for quite some time now. there is a waiting list to get into the services.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 11:40 PM
1

key words: in a time of war. war isn't a videogame.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 11:30 PM
3

he did justify it by signing up. he justified it by going special forces to begin with. i haven't been able to find anything about him getting stoplossed anywhere, so i dont know where you got that from. joining the military in a time of war and expecting not to go to said war makes you retarded and naive.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 11:25 PM
1

she'll probably fuck the judge and get the money she wants.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 11:52 PM
3

probably not, as this is from France.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 07:29 PM
2

alimony really needs a duration limit. whats stopping women from just "dating" a man the rest of her life just to ensure alimony payments keep rolling in?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 02:11 AM
-5

look it up yourself.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 02:53 AM
1

what, the fact that its proven that women pay a good amount less than men when it comes to car insurance, despite higher statistical accident rates?
/r/MensRights28/07/11 02:20 AM
83

i enjoy the fact that i pay $20 more a month than my female friend, who has 3 accidents (her fault) and multiple tickets on her record, while i have nothing (both 23).
/r/MensRights27/07/11 01:29 PM
5

$100 will get me a real, government issue'd ID at the DMV that says im 40. they aren't that hard to get, sadly.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:51 PM
1

funny thing is, the statement "only a sith deals in absolutes" is an absolute itself....
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:51 PM
10

obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:28 PM
8

obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:28 PM
7

so i, as a 23 year old male, should only have sex with and watch porn featuring grandmothers? the point is, if she has an ID given to her by the government (as in, a driver's license) that says she's 20, when she's actually 16, its my fault? if you have a fake ID, it shouldn't be statuatory rape.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:17 PM
2

most likely.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:16 PM
2

indeed. a 12 year old could have prosecuted that case better. you don't go for the death penalty when all you have is circumstantial evidence that gets beat up by the defense.
/r/MensRights25/07/11 07:29 PM
1

correct me if im wrong, but isn't hiding the downvote arrow against reddit's subreddit rules (with exceptions given in some cases, like circlejerk)?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:54 PM
-2

i find it hilarious that the subreddit has over 20 moderators. karma whoring at its finest.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 02:37 AM
4

am i missing something then? is the normal age in which you receive driving instruction in france 24?
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:42 PM
2

the girl who OP'd the thread you linked was like 16. im not sure why you took anything she said seriously. edit // TIL that alot of european people don't get their license asap.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 01:28 PM
0

thanks for that. im forced to wait to feed my true blood addiction until the DVDs of the seasons come out. i just finished 3 :(
/r/MensRights11/07/11 09:32 PM
4

this entire case has been bullshit from the start. she's changed her story atleast 4 times that i know of (from he raped her, to he tried to rape her, to he tried to rape her and when she resisted tried to force her to give him a BJ, and he tried to rape her and then tried to make her give him a Bj but she resisted. the bitch lied about being gangraped in ghana to gain political asylum in the US in the first place. why she was given ANY credibility at all is beyond me.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:41 PM
2

i enjoyed the fact that about half of them all fall under one category. you eat healthier, and are more likely to see a doctor, therefor you are at less of a risk for heart disease and live longer. derppp.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 10:33 PM
4

hes a complete and utter karma whore, often making contradictory posts within hours of eachother in different subreddits, just for karma. zzzzzzz
/r/MensRights19/06/11 05:25 PM
24

reported for spam, as per MR subreddit rules. :)
/r/MensRights12/06/11 10:48 PM
1

http://memegenerator.net/instance/8200828 was in the realated pics for that page xD
/r/MensRights12/06/11 07:00 PM
1

link? i've never seen one, and there is quite a few high-class golf clubs (no pun intended) in my state.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 04:25 PM
2

20 year old senior in high school. i know atleast my state allows you to go to high school until you turn 21.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:27 PM
3

so as long as they are a student, its illegal? thats downright retarded. what if he was a 20 year old senior?
/r/MensRights08/06/11 04:58 PM
4

im curious as to why she was ARRESTED for having a sexual affair with someone of age. i can see FIRED, but not arrested. he was 18.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 04:04 PM
3

title 9 is an absolute monster. back in high school, 4 girls wanted to play lacrosse (we didn't have a girls team, not enough interest), so they got to play with us. on top of constantly bitching and whining about us being "too rough" during practice (we were told to treat them like one of the boys, so we did. we never pulled punches in practice). on top of it all, they were all god fucking awful at the game. but, because of some passage in title 9, we had to give them equal playing time, causin…
/r/MensRights21/05/11 12:01 AM
0

i heard about these a while ago. i've been waiting ever since for some feminazi to go on a male-disfiguration spree.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 09:57 PM
2

sadly, i know. and if she was lying, she'll get nothing more than a slap on the wrist. they really need to make false rape claims a jailtime offense. for the first offense.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 02:41 AM
3

rape with no jail time. equal rights indeed.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:00 PM
4

has the maid brought forth any actual evidence other than "he raped me!"? also, did his aliby check out? i can't seem to find anything :(
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:59 PM
1

oh, i was under the impression that innocent was absolute innocence, whereas not guilty just meant there wasn't enough evidence given to convict.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 02:48 PM
9

the fact that he was found "not guilty" instead of "innocent" is terrible, but that's not why im here. the fact that the school is doing what they are doing to him is stunning, and not in a good way. he should be able to get reimbursed his legal fees, or at the very least lost pay, as well as suing the school for wrongful dismissal.
/r/MensRights15/05/11 01:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter