TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dashing2026 Archive

View 23 posts and 428 comments by Dashing2026 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
151

discussionDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 08:47 PM
115

discussionDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 02:23 AM
85

Social IssuesDashing2026/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:03 PM
81

discussionDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/24 11:21 PM
81

legal rightsDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 01:54 PM
79

resourceDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/24 02:36 AM
76

double standardsDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/24 04:55 PM
72

double standardsDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/24 04:35 PM
72

Social IssuesDashing2026/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:41 AM
62

discussionDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 04:48 AM
58

Social IssuesDashing2026/r/MensRights05/05/24 05:52 PM
46

discussionDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/24 04:03 PM
32

GeneralDashing2026/r/MensRights14/04/24 05:56 PM
28

mental healthDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 01:12 PM
27

discussionDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/24 04:14 AM
27

GeneralDashing2026/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:08 AM
25

social issuesDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 02:49 AM
24

Activism/SupportDashing2026/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:09 AM
19

mental healthDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 04:45 PM
14

Social IssuesDashing2026/r/MensRights23/04/24 03:20 PM
8

mental healthDashing2026/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 08:13 PM
3

Social IssuesDashing2026/r/MensRights27/04/24 11:04 PM
1

FeminismDashing2026/r/MensRights06/04/24 06:08 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

The proof needed: Show me a well-known feminist who attacks men for expressing loneliness. A video, article, quote... anything. I say well-known feminist because I'm well aware that many basement dwelling women hate lonesome men, but it's the influential feminists (especially those of political positions) with a large social media backing that can make an effect on men's lives, so those are the ones we ought to scrutinize.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:19 PM
-2

I simply asked for proof; the burden of proof falls on the proclaimer. And yet all I got was a downvote and an angry passive-aggressive comment lol.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:14 PM
-8

Can you please give an example of a well-know Marxist Feminist doing that?
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:38 PM
102

They're either looking for a purpose in life or are using the military as a financial lifeboat.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 08:02 AM
14

Concerning misandrist men: There is a very strong incentive for men to be feminists, or "white knights", in a fashion that harms other innocent men. It's deeper and more phycological than just "wanting to get laid"; the male ego is very closely tied with achievements, or the protection of a weaker agent like a damsel in distress or innocent children. Male feminists who demonize other men can selfishly gain the ego-boost by appearing as a hero to a female audience. We humans have a habit of proje…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/24 06:51 AM
21

Just block them. Ad-hominems are bad faith arguments.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 05:09 AM
1

My theory was constructed based on Jacque Lacan and Freudian psychoanalysis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/24 11:48 PM
56

There is a very strong incentive for men to be feminists, or "white knights", in a fashion that harms other innocent men. It's deeper and more phycological than just "wanting to get laid"; the male ego is very closely tied with achievements, or the protection of a weaker agent like a damsel in distress or innocent children. Male feminists who demonize other men can selfishly gain the ego-boost by appearing as a hero to a female audience. We humans have a habit of projecting personas onto other p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/24 04:30 AM
40

Castrate the researcher to prolong their cherished life.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 05:39 PM
34

Significantly less than the reverse scenario (that being men who empathize with women).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 12:34 PM
7

Generally, men aren't encouraged to express anger; you'd get immediately excommunicated from the mainstream crowd and labeled as childish (rightfully so to be honest; anger isn't a useful tool). Granted, the unique instances of male anger being tolerated is when it's directed towards a common good: anger at your country being insulted if you live in a nationalistic culture, or anger at criticisms of feminism if you live in a gynocentric culture are forms of male-anger that are lauded. But anger …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/24 04:41 AM
2

Moderation is key.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 12:45 AM
7

I'd say you can accurately judge that by evaluating the quality of the top posts over the past weeks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 08:54 PM
41

Men as the protectors and/or providers has long been deemed an anthropological myth. That's true that men haven't been the only provider, considering that most of modern human history entailed agricultural efforts rather than brute hunting. My point was that many progressive displays of women seem to want the best of both worlds: the lauding of femininity and expressions of beauty in women, while still seeking to equate masculine among between the two genders, essentially leaving men with no fee…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 06:14 PM
89

The idea of promoting women to being of equal physical strength to men creates an interesting double standard: women are lauded in the style of lipstick feminism, where their beauty and fashion begets adoration and romantic attention, this feminine charm is exclusively attributed to women. Men on the other hand are being denied of the masculine identity of strength and athleticism; any attempts to suggest that men do more of the protecting/providing is labeled as misogynistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 03:45 PM
11

Because their rejection could beget accusations of misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/24 01:27 AM
1

I think it's equally important as how we talk that we evaluate the reasonableness of whom we are addressing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/24 01:52 PM
29

Traditional values aren't always ideal; our ancestors acted not based on tradition, but rather on necessity, there's no reason for us to act the same as them when we have more leeway in our lives today. Why act as a soldier, as a man would be in the 1700s, when life today grants a man the ability to live for himself?
/r/MensRights25/05/24 03:32 AM
12

Speaking of physicality, notice how boys are encouraged to be more violent? Many of us were likely taught to be violent to solve issues. I understand violence in self-defence, but I don’t want to be randomly violent. I suspect that a reason behind this systemic conditioning stems from emotional neglect; encouraging boys to be violent may not be a deliberate end goal in people's mind, rather it's an apathetic suggestion given to young boys for them to solve their problems on their own. A more sym…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/24 02:48 AM
164

They have the vague idea of male chivalry, and they'll seek to use it for their own well-being. Male feminism is repackaged traditional chivalry, to a large extent.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 11:54 PM
1

Men have problems unique to them in life, something which women do not fathom. It's not an esoteric matter as you're portraying.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 06:09 PM
8

A downvote doesn't mean hate, just disagreement.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 05:48 PM
3

I understand what you mean; yes, men and women have many shared problems. Socioeconomic challenges are a great example of that. Society can be analyzed through many perspectives: employer vs working class, hetro vs lgbt, Majority ethnicity vs minority, and so on. If we leave aside discussions of problems that both men and women share such as class issues, we could see a dynamic that splits humanity into two groups: male and female. Feminism was more than just an economic discussion, it analyzed …
/r/MensRights23/05/24 05:48 PM
-8

I understand what you mean; yes, men and women have many shared problems. Socioeconomic challenges are a great example of that. Society can be analyzed through many perspectives: employer vs working class, hetro vs lgbt, Majority ethnicity vs minority, and so on. If we leave aside discussions of problems that both men and women share such as class issues, we could see a dynamic that splits humanity into two groups: male and female. Feminism was more than just an economic discussion, it analyzed …
/r/MensRights23/05/24 05:20 PM
16

There are conflicts of interest between the two genders; yes we must find a common ground, but we must also understand that the idea of feminism trickling down benefits to men isn't always true, many aspects of feminism benefit women at the expense of men, job quotas (in fields with more male applicants) are one example of that.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:15 PM
5

Strong projection here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 02:20 PM
30

I agree that it's not a zero sum game, it's just that women can worry about their own problems, and for men to do that as well would be redundant. I hardly see any women Masculists, thus men ought to learn how to prioritize their own welfare instead of being male feminists or chivalrous trad-cons; two sides of the same coin.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 02:18 PM
222

I see your perspective. But I think we should focus less on what's good or bad for women, and more so on what's better for men.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 01:30 PM
44

It's not a good idea to teach half the population that they're perpetual victims to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 05:50 AM
28

I've reached a point in life where I no longer believe the idea that everyone has something useful to say. And when I see nonsense like this, I simply ignore it as it's not even worth engaging.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/24 01:11 AM
2

Of course, just the good ones, much like men.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:44 PM
1

I think Islam has much to offer for the betterment of men, because unlike many other ideologies, Islam does not bend-over backwards to please women, and it actually has respect for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/24 03:28 AM
7

He does seem to have bootstraps mentality, much like Peterson.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/24 03:26 AM
8

Nice!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/24 01:39 PM
34

This is a fascinating and well-written post, and it makes very good points. I do hold some skepticism towards münecat, a video of hers made a few years ago shows her lambasting men's problems with derision, and reverting to the age old feminist tradition of "men don't have problems, but even if they do it's because of toxic masculinity". She also is a believer in patriarchal theory, and seems to apply the theory to discussions of economics where she blames women's lesser income on sexism rather …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/24 11:46 PM
4

What a cruel fate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/24 05:50 PM
61

Rarely can women systematically engender fear in men by sheet acts of looking, gesturing, or behaving in a particular way. What is the penalty women risk when caught making a false accusation against a male?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/24 04:37 PM
7

Gotta hit that daily quota of patriarchal behavior 💪💪
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:08 AM
6

Whats so wrong about woman graduating more prepared If you mean more prepared than men, That puts men at a disadvantage compared to women; it runs against the feminist doctrine of equality, which is what it promised.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 10:42 PM
8

Higher grades ≠ More prepared. Our economy isn't as meritocratic as we think, an individual is better off having opportunities thrown their way rather than toughening it out.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 09:22 PM
213

I don't think it's only about unfair grading; men are culturally lambasted while women are lauded. It's easier to focus on your studies and work when you're not emotionally abused on a systemic level.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 04:30 PM
12

Since when where humans ever sane lol
/r/MensRights18/05/24 02:22 AM
25

I think women are only good at creating a facade of agreeableness compared to men.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 02:31 PM
29

They're
/r/MensRights17/05/24 11:03 AM
81

Their problem.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 03:23 AM
8

It's hurtful to be told that you're privileged and that your life is easy when the polar opposite is true. The role(s) of men has been eroded over the past half-century, I know, and the paths to status, self-esteem and meaning are unclear or impossible to access for many of us. You hit the mark with this statement; the psychological burden men face today is enormous. There will never be a perfect society; we can allocate only a limited amount of resources for the sake of humanity as a whole, but…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/24 01:09 AM
7

I have come to be skeptical towards any sort of scientific claim made within the studies of sociology, psychology, and humanities, especially so if it encompasses topics of male and female dynamics. Such topics are more often than not rife with bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/24 03:27 PM
1

there’s def a blue collar good man niche, i see it among women who are really attracted to southern men, the cowboy vibe. True, but it's still a niche as you said it. Proportionally, and as more women attain college degrees compared to men, those men who lack formal corporate work are in disfavor in the western dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 12:55 PM
1

Men, particularly those of conservative background, have explicitly stated their favor for a dynamic where they pay the bills while the partner does housework; thus men have been shown to upkeep the balance of traditional norms, so I don't think your theory holds weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 10:56 AM
-10

Yeah I found it ridiculous when he said it, though this isn't related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:04 AM
1

Are you suggesting that women are more likely to be progressive than men?
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:03 AM
1

I'm not sure what you mean; the vast majority of women minded their own business in the case of this war, those protestors were very few in comparison to the overall population.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 10:02 AM
25

I don't think this is a gender-issue, it's driven more by political ideology, the "protect the marginalized" moral code of progressivism.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 02:46 AM
6

From: https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/terrorism#Terrorism-Definitions Domestic terrorism: Violent, criminal acts committed by individuals and/or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature. DV usually happens in the form of a drunkard loosing his temper against a close female relative; this can hardly be classified as terrorism. Perhaps there are indeed fringe red-pill groups who do advoca…
/r/MensRights14/05/24 02:13 AM
-5

The moral dilemma often brought up, and I believe it's worthy of a discussion: would a conscription of men yield an outcome of lesser destruction compared to the alternate reality where there's no conscription. To apply this logic to a case theory, we see today's Ukraine facing an invasion from an uncompromising totalitarian force. Our question here is that if we follow the humanist route and abstain from conscription, could Ukraine end up loosing more male civilians at the hands of the invading…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 11:32 PM
12

Non-western countries have a bigger emphasis on serving a higher cause rather than embracing liberal humanism; notwithstanding that (and outside of a few war-torn countries like Afghanistan), there still is noticeable preferential treatment towards women, such as, whilst men are held to the traditional soldier conditioning - of course, this isn't to deny that women do in fact have many challenges in many third world countries.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 10:11 PM
18

UK?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 10:08 PM
8

Human personalities are essentially by-products of their environment, it is certainly the case that hyper-aggressive personalities are simply reactionary to what they've been adapted towards. Notwithstanding that, we still shouldn't tolerate any sort of toxic behavior due to us understanding its background.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 04:59 PM
2

If we do not show these guys they're unwanted even here we'll never get people to see what we stand for. If those people will be so hostile to the MRA to the point of labeling it as a hate group then they aren't worth taking seriously in the first place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 04:55 PM
8

"Bully", I think dissociating from them is a good idea, but bullying them is too far and honestly is sounds outright malicious; those men who embrace such ideologies are often mentally struggling and feel outcasted from society, what's the point of bullying them? Moreover, TRP is toxic because it takes some truths and pushes them too far; even Buddhism became violent when it's disciplines where radicalized. Thus, I wouldn't keep a completely closed mind when listening to its talking points, even…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/24 02:36 PM
36

One of the most heinous feminist talking points is the idea that men commit suicide more often because supposedly they are conditioned to be selfish and pursue a goal (the goal in this question being suicide) at all costs. Hence by that logic men would be inclined to use severe methods for death such as hanging or a firearm.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:18 PM
1

If you find the right woman then yes.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:06 PM
1

Not the best mentality to have when certain actions have consequences.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:41 PM
1

Who's expecting women to do both chores and paying bills?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:13 PM
1

On that note, many social conservatives turn into liberal socialists when women's welfare is discussed. I'd say most leftists are only opportunistically so.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:12 PM
5

And it appealed to a wide audience.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 04:11 PM
1

Their theory of successful women reverting to traditional norms or at least finding any flaw in the current western dynamics that offer women better career opportunities than men are unfounded; the vast majority of people hold little to no interest in male welfare, so this definitely isn't a topic that would circulate the heads of anyone not affiliated with MRA sentiments.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:07 PM
1

Not necessarily, one's lack of opportunity to gain certain bits of knowledge doesn't equate the intent to harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 03:03 PM
2

A "mistake" is something that happens accidentally; a slip or glitch in one's behavior. For someone to go as far as to seriously plan an exit from your life in the case that you turn evil and violent is someone who doesn't trust you, what's marriage without trust? You can apply the logic in reverse; would a woman be taking it too far if she divorces her husband after finding out he made a go-bag? 80% of divorces are initiated by women, so that would be the most likely reaction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/24 10:07 AM
3

The wife admitted that it's for a DV emergency.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/24 10:04 AM
14

That's true, I saw some of the comments and they were disgusting. Those people are just hopeless, best avoided.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/24 01:44 AM
19

I kind of suspect that it's a guy larping as the original OP - nonetheless, the divorce was inevitable. If she can't trust him enough for her own physical safety to the point where she has to plan an emergency exit then the relationship is flawed from the start. I think many men get into toxic relationships much due to their lack of standards; women are all different, some are amazing and others just vile, and what I think many men do as a mistake is hoping for a "wife and family", which greatly…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/24 01:30 AM
6

It's the men who have never faced adversity in their careers because of heavy social biases that are the ones who are so out of touch In 2022, single women owned 58% of the nearly 35.2 million homes owned by unmarried Americans, while single men owned 42%. In 2023, 60.5% of homeless people were cisgender men, compared to 38.3% for cis women. By the 1990s, more women were applying to college than men. In the 2021-2022 academic year, nearly 60% of all college students were women. The suicide rate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 06:49 PM
2

The same logic would go when analyzing black and white citizens in the USA. Overall, black Americans are arrested at 2.6 times the per-capita rate of all other Americans, and this ratio is even higher for murder (6.3 times) and robbery (8.1 times)). Our understanding of human nature, in its form of Tabula Rasa, would dictate that human beings are essentially by-products of their environment. Can we really expect people in war-torn Vietnam 1980s to not embody certain forms of aggressive behavior?…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 05:25 PM
3

The same logic would go when analyzing black and white citizens in the USA. Overall, black Americans are arrested at 2.6 times the per-capita rate of all other Americans, and this ratio is even higher for murder (6.3 times) and robbery (8.1 times)). Our understanding of human nature, in its form of Tabula Rasa, would dictate that human beings are essentially by-products of their environment. Can we really expect people in war-torn Vietnam 1980s to not embody certain forms of aggressive behavior?…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 05:09 PM
8

I don't see how your comment relates to mine; I spoke of how society generally lacks empathy towards men, whereas your comment claimed that I'm invalidating your struggles and problems. I'm not seeing the connection here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 04:49 PM
1

⁠> tall men are more politically conservative than short men, Is there research done on this matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:02 AM
14

I don't think society is deliberate with its push of men towards adversity, rather it's more so how society allocates its resource of empathy: towards women and children first. Thus, society's perspective towards men is more so in the form of "I wish things could be different, but I can't help you". Edit: fixed typo; "can" to "can't" in last sentence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/24 11:26 AM
95

Most didn't, concerning the attainment of prestigious education. https://www.pbs.org/fmc/book/3education1.htm#:~:text=Few%20American%20adolescents%20completed%20high,population%20had%20graduated%20from%20college. Few American adolescents completed high school in 1900, and only one in fifty finished college.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:03 PM
30

Let's start calling a crop-top a "false accuser".
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:22 PM
5

A shill indeed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 02:21 PM
1

You got banned because of this bizarre opinion.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 02:47 AM
20

OP you have to add a comment to elaborate more on the issue to stay compliant with the sub's rules.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 12:09 AM
-10

I think it has to do with appearance; women see men as much larger and robust beings and thus feel an odd combination when men are vulnerable. Edit: you folks are seriously arguing in bad faith if you are insinuating that I support such a mentality as opposed to just calling it as it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/24 12:08 AM
35

What policies have been implemented in South Korea for the betterment of men?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:56 PM
-3

I think only conservative women do.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 11:59 AM
1

It's life, nothing is permanent. I'd say either go for a transplant or shave it all off, don't try to pull off a half-haired style. To be honest, a bald guy who's well-dressed and muscular is far better looking than an overweight individual in baggy clothes and a head full of hair.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 02:54 AM
2

Communism for me, capitalism for thee.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:53 PM
22

We need Masculism: feminism had a humanist element, it wasn't a question of what practical nuances where associated with women's empowerment, rather it was done simply for the sake of women's welfare. If we are to talk of men's problems, concepts of economics, practicality, and other sorts of quantitative lenses ought to be second priority behind the need to better men's lives. In other words, let's not think of bettering men's lives for the sake of "achieving a better society", rather Masculism…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/24 04:21 PM
3

Allen J.Beck and David Cantor, "Sexual Victimization in Juvenile Facilities Reported by Youth, 2012," National Survey of Youth in Custody, 2012, US Department of Justice, June 6, 2013, http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/709100-svjfry12-emb-052813
/r/MensRights06/05/24 02:28 PM
9

Women had feminism to relieve them of whatever burden they had, men are yet to have their masculism.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 02:20 PM
18

Women's enrollment into the workforce also decreased men's labor wage; thus it is unfair to expect men to pay for everything.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 02:00 PM
4

True, traditionalism fails if society by and large embraces a different morality. The key for men's well-being is masculism, which is to embrace men's well-being without the need for appeals to traditions.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 01:58 PM
3

There are two types of male feminists; those who seek fairness for both genders, and those who want to boost their ego by playing hero. And many others could be along that spectrum. The only way to know which group a person belongs to is to see how consistent they are with their morals; would they express equal concern to men's high suicide rate as much as they would with the problems women face? Or for example, would they blame men for women's problems, while claiming that men's problems are se…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 01:06 PM
3

It always has been honestly; a skinny 90 yo politician was more powerful than a hundred young brutes during the Roman empire, and any other ancient time I can think of.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 12:00 PM
5

I think they're "insecure" in the sense that they try to prove themselves to something greater than themselves, they renounce individualism. There's nothing wrong with that however, tradcons are honest about their intentions, whereas male feminists will exploit those around them for their ego-fulfillment.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:53 AM
10

Such people can't be reasoned with.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 08:22 PM
8

Social media is where people show their sentiments, I would not take that too lightly.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:19 PM
3

The fault is in him.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 04:40 PM
7

I think there is an inherent biological drive in humans to see men as tools for the greater good; men who reject the mainstream values may be deemed as not contributing to the overall goal of the observer and that fuels animosity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 04:17 PM
8

I think it's more nuanced than that; men can win "social points" or popularity if they're willing to pander to the mainstream by being male feminists or virtue-signalling heros.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/24 04:16 PM
5

There are a lot of good women out there.. just make sure she ain't neurotic.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 04:07 PM
6

It's both: men and women who are gynocentric, let's not blame women only much like how feminists blame men only.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 03:39 PM
76

I think we also have to keep in mind that a huge number of men are sycophantic simps who pander to women for their own egotistical heroic image.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 12:35 PM
78

Who raises these women?
/r/MensRights03/05/24 11:48 AM
20

Folks why give such attention to such an idiotic phenomena? I personally wouldn't bother debating a person who doesn't display a hint of reason and competency.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 01:46 AM
1

Yeah, that resonates with what have come to be repulsed by. Keep in mind that the miserable ones are usually the loudest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 12:55 AM
5

We'd have to define "masculinity" or "traditions" here. Based on my understanding the traditional expressions of masculinity can include positive message such as self-protection, loyalty to family, and refusing to succumb to a tyrannical authority. However traditionalism can also extend to more toxic grounds such as nationalism, militarism, selflessness and other harmful doctrines. Thus, when we analyze traditional masculinity holistically, we can see specific elements that not only aren't harmf…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 12:10 AM
1

I've always noticed that! It's only models that they have posing on the frontline, where are the tough, masculine, and veteran women? That adds proof to the facade of the female soldier.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 10:28 PM
1

Theoretically, without the draft, Russia would indeed conquer the entirety of Ukraine and make it another one of its province; the question then is how the Ukrainian population would be treated under Russian rule.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 10:24 PM
28

I'm not very religious, but the Quran has a nice quote that I remind myself when dealing with such unreasonable people: قُلْ مُوتُوا۟ بِغَيْظِكُمْ "Tell them: die in your anger".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 09:19 PM
53

Women getting killed by men is rare and the absolutely worst that could happen, and it of course should be taken seriously. Men getting falsely accused by women of doing wrong and having their lives and psychological wellbeing wrecked, or a women compelling another man to inflict harm on him, are rare and absolute worst that could happen, should they be taken seriously?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 09:16 PM
14

Yeah I've noticed conservatives like Jordan Peterson preaching "man up; adopt some responsibility!" These are almost always directed towards men, the a-priori in many conservative cultures is that women are morality purer than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 05:40 PM
5

As a rule of thumb; progressive ideology often harbors resentment towards masculine identity.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 04:48 PM
26

I think even nations without conscriptions would immediately back-peddle on their pacifist gender-egalitarian sentiment and choose to conscript men only should war-time come; it's a deeper issue than just legal nuance, there's a sociobiological explanation to how men are viewed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 04:35 PM
10

Women most affectedTM
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 03:18 PM
1

The existence of male simps proves and conservative women proves otherwise.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 02:29 AM
2

Not necessarily, most discussions on this sub have been civil and very much relevant to men's issues, in fact I'd say the discussions here are the most constructive I've seen from reddit with regards to male welfare. Maybe some are a bit out of line, but this post is a massive outlier.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 02:13 AM
10

I think you misunderstood the purpose of this sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 01:15 AM
1

Please don't project.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/24 08:26 PM
35

I did find it odd that they consider the MRA (even the extreme types) to be a bigger threat than corrupt politicians, lobbyists, wealth elites, labor abusing corporations, Russian cyberattacks, religious fundamentalism, and so on..
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/24 03:13 PM
10

So if I make a post on r/rant and call it "I'm starting to hate women..", and post a few examples of toxic women and use those minute examples to generalize 4,000,000,000 people, would that be decent morality on my behalf? Heck, it wouldn't matter anyway since it would be taken down immediately. Y'all better start acknowledging the empathy gap between men and women, and we men are treated like damn monsters. Edit: of course she blocks me lmao.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 01:07 PM
5

the guy on reddit who points out the truth?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 11:56 AM
1

I agree that moderation is key, what I tried to convey was how many men are pushed into the hero complex much due to social conditioning: conservatives tell men to "man up", while progressives guilt trip. John Stuart Mill once said that "Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.” I personally think that "bad people" are rare, evil archetypes like Putin are certainly the exceptions in the human race; the merit of capitalism is that it place…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 11:35 AM
3

their tribal affiliation grants shared rights and resources to everyone in their community. Selfishness and hoarding are frowned upon. But that's precisely what would make them selfishly conservative; even some like Putin or Trump is a "communist" within his familial and social circle, one wouldn't be a benign leftist if their benevolence extends only to their close beloved ones, and not only that, but they also harbor animosity towards anything they deem as an outsider. The average person grant…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 11:17 AM
1

Identifying political activists who hurt men is how we help men.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 12:35 AM
0

Japan is commonly touted as a patriarchy where women are disadvantaged over men; if women want to indulge in such projected nonsense onto men they'd have to answer to contradictory realities such as a statistic as this one.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:14 PM
2

Ah I see, the judge will be in favor of a female lawyer.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:49 PM
1

It's strange because she may hold a bias in favor of women; genders have an in-group bias.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:47 PM
2

Get a female lawyer. Any reason why it's better for the lawyer to be female?
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:16 PM
1

It's a sort of libertarian approach to life, not the American "libertarianism" which is just thinly cloaked conservatism; rather it is a lifestyle to focus purely on oneself and one's own family rather than carrying the burden of humanity through political efforts. I have made a post about this in further detail: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/wfYZuIEj6B I feel that much like how people abuse women by perceiving them as beauty objects - they also abuse men by portraying them as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 02:16 AM
2

Record and document everything, get a lawyer, and keep calm and diplomatic.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:17 AM
70

I have come to notice that "toxic masculinity" is tolerated when projected at a desired political ambition. For example, when a male feminist aggressively shouts and shuts down MRA talking points, though he embodies the traits known as toxic masculinity, since he sides with feminism he is labeled as a healthy representative of masculinity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/24 12:50 AM
143

If you support a law like that, might as well explicitly state your opinion that women are weaker than men.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 11:05 PM
100

I think by "movement", they mean something like menslib; essentially they seek men to open up only in acceptable, politically correct ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 11:05 PM
24

Most leftists are only opportunistically so; their adherence to topics of equality and fairness extend only the point that they are self-satisfied with the result. I'd say deep within the fabric of every human, there is selfish conservatism one way or another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 10:14 PM
5

The problem with trp is that it takes a few truths and pushes them to an absurd extreme. I actually appreciate trp's rejection of traditional values; a common mantra I see in it is that it is the collective disappointment in men not seeing the results promised to them should they act traditional. Despite that however, the movement is too radical to be taken seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 08:56 PM
1

Can they not renounce it?
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:29 PM
2

This is just wicked; no male (Ukrainian or Russian) should be forced to this sort of militant slavery.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:28 PM
2

Focus on your money and career and forget about the world's problems. As extremist as this guy is, his chapter on hoe to avoid toxic women is worth a read: https://entrepreneursincars.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/The-Unplugged-Alpha-Chapter-4-20-Red-Flags-1.pdf Not all women are equal: find a good-looking moral women (preferably conservative/religious) and be loyal to her.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 06:00 PM
8

I made a post about this exact topic: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/ke5xrAqP4B It's still awaiting approval however.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 05:58 PM
31

The small minority of men occupy the top, and the majority of them at the bottom. Whereas most women sit in the comfortable protected middle class.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 05:57 PM
2

Is anyone else embracing quietism more much due to the hypocrisy of most people?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 03:18 PM
151

The fact that 7% of homeless people in Japan are women is proof that Japan is a misogynistic patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:38 PM
2

You can still see men's oppression of women in most places on Earth outside of the first world. Muslim theocracies like Saudi Arabia come to mind. Women in prosperous Islamic societies live in the similar standards of dignity as western women; countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan could be equated with christian countries such the Congo or Guatemala, that is if we are to cherry pick. The western lens often misses points of suffering of men in other nations and choose to focus exclusively on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 01:35 PM
1

You can still see men's oppression of women in most places on Earth outside of the first world. Muslim theocracies like Saudi Arabia come to mind. Women in prosperous Islamic societies live in the similar standards of dignity as western women; countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan could be equated with christian countries such the Congo or Guatemala, that is if we are to cherry pick. The western lens often misses points of suffering of men in other nations and choose to focus exclusively on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 01:26 PM
1

You can still see men's oppression of women in most places on Earth outside of the first world. Muslim theocracies like Saudi Arabia come to mind. Women in prosperous Islamic societies live in the similar standards of dignity as western women; countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan could be equated with christian countries such the Congo or Guatemala, that is if we are to cherry pick. The western lens often misses points of suffering of men in other nations and choose to focus exclusively on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 01:25 PM
–

Women in prosperous Islamic societies live in the similar standards of dignity as western women; countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan could be equated with christian countries such the Congo or Guatemala, that is if we are to cherry pick. The western lens often misses points of suffering of men in other nations and choose to focus exclusively on women's issues; for example, if women in Turkey aren't sheltered enough from DV, a western analysis would most likely ignore the fact that most pe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/24 01:20 PM
1

u/Vegetable_Ad1732 That's an interesting perspective that I'll lend to a few seconds of my time: from my experience, I actually noticed the complete opposite. So unless you can counter-argue by fetching me half a dozen scholarly articles, your argument is completely destroyed and flushed down the drain; what a pity. Be cautious and avoid your childishness however: even if you do bring all the peer-reviewed studies, that will most likely still not bolster your argument. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:53 PM
12

Most moderate (sane) conservatives are very much in support of female empowerment, for example: in two republican states, Texas and Mississippi, their state universities have a female majority: 56.3:43.6 and 57:43. With a high female enrollment in these very conservative states, we can conclude that conservatives do foster an environment that pushes women towards education and careerhood. I'm not criticism women's enrollment in education of course, what I'm against is the hypocrisy of feminists …
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:09 PM
1

u/Vegetable_Ad1733 That's an interesting perspective that I'll lend to a few seconds of my time: from my experience, I actually noticed the complete opposite. So unless you can counter-argue by fetching me half a dozen scholarly articles, your argument is completely destroyed and flushed down the drain; what a pity. Be cautious and avoid your childishness however: even if you do bring all the peer-reviewed studies, that will most likely still not bolster your argument. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:07 PM
1

The best counter to this, is to use peer-reviewed studies for your arguments. You used anecdote and suggested me to use peer-reviewed studies for my claim; that's a pathetically childish move on your behalf. I would use such support for a variety of topics concerning economics, science, nutrition and so worth; but gender studies is definitely not a field I would rely on academics, especially considering that academia has shown itself over the past few decades to steer strongly in the favor of fe…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:03 AM
1

The best counter to this, is to use peer-reviewed studies for your arguments. I would use such support for a variety of topics concerning economics, science, nutrition and so worth; but gender studied is definitely not a field I would rely on academics on, especially considering that academia has shown itself over the past few decades to steer in the direction of feminist talking points, while completely staying ignorant to any sort of concept regarding male vulnerability that isn't related to w…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 02:49 AM
4

Because society is only accepting of male vulnerability when it's concerning politically correct topics.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:56 AM
7

I think the problem here would that what is defined as "housework" could be termed in favor of women for a desired end result. For example, if a washing machine runs for two hours, while clearing the snow from the front-lawn takes only one; the feminist-biased interpretation here would be that women do more household work than men.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 07:53 PM
2

I think this statistics may make it seem like femicide if we don't know the ratio between women and children; what percentage of that 70% are actually women? For a gender analysis, we're better off removing the age factor and splitting it as male-female. Notwithstanding that, it could be the case that that's only civilian casualties while males make up more military ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/24 01:01 PM
3

From my observations, sycophantic men are often emotionally mistreated by the women they submit to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/24 03:28 AM
3

I understand what you mean, but We'd have to define "masculinity" or "traditions" here. Based on my understanding the traditional expressions of masculinity can include positive message such as self-protection, loyalty to family, and refusing to succumb to a tyrannical authority. However traditionalism can also extend to more toxic grounds such as nationalism, militarism, selflessness and other harmful doctrines. Thus, when we analyze traditional masculinity holistically, we can see specific ele…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/24 09:22 PM
5

I would say it's the norm in human behavior; we are creatures of ego and emotion, not logic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/24 03:19 PM
7

Yes that's a title error.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 12:39 PM
-2

A bit off-topic to the question and I speak anecdotally, I notice through movies, social media, and talk shows that it's become less socially acceptable to make fun of people because of their height.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/24 12:24 PM
11

Don't hold the door, heck don't even look them, just work to pay the bills and move on.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 12:01 PM
1

Why is there so much anger coming from your comments? It sounds like you're just taking your anger out on others much due to your sexual, financial, and emotional failures. There's a place for you in this world, go find it; you not being able to get laid is no excuse for these angry comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 02:14 AM
0

Any detailed articles on this subject matter?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/24 02:13 AM
–

Don't reason with unreasonable people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 02:11 AM
9

If one is a heterosexual man, yes he would need a woman to form a meaningful relationship, for life is more than just about material gain. Of course, the real challenge is finding a good woman, which is exceedingly rare in the western world, an end result of feminist puppets like Justin Trudeau and trad-con dorks like Jordan Peterson being two sides of the same coin to not know how to push back against feminism.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 09:55 PM
74

Feminism is not men's ally. And menslib subreddit is just mensfeminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/24 08:01 PM
17

Why are you spamming that comment across multiple subreddits?
/r/MensRights25/04/24 03:32 PM
17

They'll just blame toxic masculinity, no need for self-reflecting is you just project.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 12:59 AM
-19

I'm a bit out of the loop on the whole Russo-Ukraine war here, and my opinion is controversial and may be ignorant of certain facts and nuances, but wouldn't it be better for the sake of halting bloodshed if Ukraine hands over its Russo-speaking areas to that tyrant Putin?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 09:23 PM
3

In November 2019 Dickie was found dead in HMP Perth. However, Glass is due to be considered for parole and could be released as early as next month after serving just half of her sentence. Mr Donaldson's family has written to the Parole Board to demand she stays behind bars. The western world just adores women doesn't it?
/r/MensRights24/04/24 09:16 PM
33

Women's violence often takes form through male proxy. A simp attack-dog is the ideal weapon for women.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 08:53 PM
145

They have insights over both gender psychology that most people may not fathom. I do recall a ftm expressing their great surprise over camera at how apathetic people were towards him since his transition. While not a transition; Norah Vincent did an incredible documentary over how she role-played the life of a man for almost a year, it took a great toll on her psychology and possibly contributed to her medically assisted suicide in July 2022. Edit: name change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 07:26 PM
6

I know, it's this that doesn't inspire optimism: The Men’s Equality Commission believes that this is a good starting point for an open public conversation about men and boys’ place in gender equality policies. The closing statement; discourse is often ineffective, the unspoken rule here is that a "problem" can only be recognized if it is politically correct. For example, would this commission recognize the sociological phenomena of the empathy gap? That would be too uncomfortable for people to d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 06:05 PM
36

Let's hope they don't target "toxic masculinity", project that pathology on men, and lump all men's problems on that idea, essentially turning it into a "man-up and fix your own problems".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 05:50 PM
3

My point was to question the standpoint of victimhood feminists claim with their relationship with conservative men: if the most conservative state in the US (Mississippi) has its most prestigious university composed majorly of women, is it accurate for feminists to claim status of victimhood by notion of conservatives obscuring women's path to autonomy and success?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 03:10 PM
5

4 out of 5 of my friends understand this, and we talked about it. The 5th one tries to be apolitical and neutral about everything. That's anecdotal, keep in mind that our friends often mimics ourselves, that's what kindled the friendship to begin with. Do you notice consistent implementation of morality across all leftists? I notice misandry far more than not, I am a pessimist with regards to peoples' potential for benevolence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/24 02:19 AM
11

I agree that the right does indeed screw over both men and women, but I see flaws the notion that conservatism is totally against women's empowerment: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/Ah1iUdffyc I agree with your points with regards to the two types of leftists, the unfortunate reality is that most self-proclaimed "leftists" are not objective enough to belong to the second group. Most people are left wing or right wing on select issues that impact them. For instance someone might…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/24 11:51 PM
2

It is opposed to Feminism in the sense that it wants to reestablish female gender roles. I think that's only the case with extreme traditionalists who are glorifying a golden age which never existed. Most moderate (sane) conservatives are very much in support of female empowerment, for example: in two republican states, Texas and Mississippi, their state universities have a female majority: 56.3:43.6 and 57:43. With a high female enrollment in these very conservative states, we can conclude that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/24 11:29 PM
2

True, leftists often see self-minding individuals as complicit with the harm-bringers.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 10:28 PM
1

Lmao the grilling says it all.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 10:28 PM
32

This would necessitate equal support for masculanism as for feminism, but I do not feel that humankind has empathy for men as it does for women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/24 06:51 PM
12

I don't get all the fus over "population decline", the world was almost a billion off decades ago compared to today and it was doing just fine.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:00 PM
19

I think it's because when we're young we are unaware of how to distinguish between good and bad people; and if we're not being careful with who we get intimate with, we may severely regret the decision in years to come and become jaded with the opposite gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/24 05:26 PM
32

Because we would have to acknowledge that sexual liberalism does harm to a great deal of people, and for some they equate that criticism to old-school Puritanism and misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/24 04:37 PM
2

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/24 01:08 PM
3

If one is tolerant on the condition that they only hear opinions that align with theirs, then they aren't tolerant in the slightest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/24 02:45 AM
18

Watanabe was charged with defrauding three men in their 50s out of a total of ¥155.8 million in cash between 2021 and 2023, and with helping a 21-year-old woman in Nagoya defraud two men of a total of about ¥10 million in 2022 by selling her a manual titled "A Reference Book for Sugar Babies.” You cannot make this sh*t up. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights23/04/24 02:43 AM
2

People empathize more with lonely women compared to lonely men; the latter are often viscously attacked if they speak of a "loneliness epidemic". Of course women aren't going to lash out aggressively to a society that empathizes with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:39 AM
1

Or maybe it's the fact that people empathize more with lonely women compared to lonely men; the latter are often viscously attacked if they speak of a "loneliness epidemic". Of course women aren't going to lash out aggressively to a society that empathizes with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 01:39 AM
1

He saw a comment I made a while back were I claimed that conscription for men only, while inhumane, isn't necessarily misandry, and thus he concluded that I'm a "Right-winger who supports conscriptions".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 11:23 PM
0

You dense kid, by advocating for left wing males we encourage them not to get angry over cultural nonsense. This advice would work well for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 10:30 PM
1

The only lying hypocrite here is you who is making nonsense up. I am a moderate conservative, not as right-wing as Trump or Descantes **I want to provide criticism of Leftists like Zizek, which highlights that the leftist talk of equity and fairness doesn't hold basis, I never claimed to be the perfect agent of fairness and equality. How does that make me a "proud hypocrite"? Calling out flaws in leftists doesn't mean I deny the harms of rightism, and so that doesn't make me a hypocrite. And how…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 10:27 PM
1

Well, it seems that you're actually looking for a fight and not too keen on being reasonable. What makes you think I'm right-winged, and in what ways am I a hypocrite, and why am I wrong for criticizing Zizek's contradictory beliefs?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 07:58 PM
1

Link it please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 07:52 PM
1

I understand you are full of anger, irritation, and impatience (anything else?), but where in my comments did I claim to be of right-wing ideology? I will place my comment here again in case you missed it: The hypocrisy is on both ends: rightists and leftists have shown to be insufferable and unwilling to stick to their own ideals, that's why I've stepped away from politics and consider myself a center-liberal as I simply cannot trust people to be fair on a consistent basis, and Zizek (who happi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 07:50 PM
9

I think one can help others in indirect ways; for instance if one works as a banker for the energy sector and they donate a fixed percentage of their income for cancer charities, then they are greatly helping without the need to switch careers to medicine and so on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/24 06:26 PM
24

All the time yes, that's why most inmates aren't male.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 06:11 PM
17

Women in prosperous Islamic societies live in the similar standards of dignity as western women; countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan could be equated with christian countries such the Congo or Guatemala, that is if we are to cherry pick. The western lens often misses points of suffering of men in other nations and choose to focus exclusively on women's issues; for example, if women in Turkey aren't sheltered enough from DV, a western analysis would most likely ignore the fact that most pe…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 01:52 AM
31

"Society doesn't owe.." is the quintessential conservative motto, and it's baffling how leftist minded people would say this in good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/24 03:19 PM
15

We'd have to define "masculinity" or "traditions" here. Based on my understanding the traditional expressions of masculinity can include positive message such as self-protection, loyalty to family, and refusing to succumb to a tyrannical authority. However traditionalism can also extend to more toxic grounds such as nationalism, militarism, selflessness and other harmful doctrines. Thus, when we analyze traditional masculinity holistically, we can see specific elements that not only aren't harmf…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/24 05:22 AM
63

Men do open up, but unless the problem they open up about is politically correct, they risk massive backlash and derision. The idea that male suffering is due to toxic masculinity and patriarchal traditions is an absurd obfuscation of the fact that liberal misandry is precisely was is harming male psychology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/24 04:30 AM
2

Male feminists often project their own sins onto the rest of men. If they seriously believe that it's men's inherent tendency to dominate and abuse women, then it's their eye lens that's defected here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/24 02:59 AM
10

Men aren't holistically privileged over women. Humans give more empathy for women than men. Women are physically weaker, but socially stronger; marrying the wrong women can wreck your life. The "matrix" (silly term but good idea) is essentially the false belief that you are part of some great nation/culture that cares about you: it doesn't. The only person that can help you is yourself. Feminists are opportunistically traditional: no feminist will advocate for 50-50 conscriptions, and will happi…
/r/MensRights19/04/24 07:10 PM
5

The hypocrisy is on both ends: rightists and leftists have shown to be insufferable and unwilling to stick to their own ideals, that's why I've stepped away from politics and consider myself a center-liberal as I simply cannot trust people to be fair on a consistent basis, and Zizek (who happily threw other men under the bus) is a prime example of that. Give this a thorough read: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/ZpSMsLEifO Conscriptions are supported by both parties; authoritaria…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 01:54 PM
1

Besides Afghanistan and other outliers, Islamic countries hold the typical tradcon roles for men: be a protector and provider and always be chivalrous towards women.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 01:51 PM
1

Where did I say that I'm right winged?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 12:59 PM
7

Between Lenin and a moderate Leftist is a massive rift. Being too invested in politics to the point of giving a hearing to all opinions (such as the worthless one by the Attorney-General) is unnecessary, as such cultural BS won't make a difference on the long run.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 01:11 AM
1

The anonymity of the internet would have displayed that, but it's nowhere to be found.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/24 11:40 PM
5

Politics in general is corrosive to mental health.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/24 11:15 PM
3

Then I go out and commit an actual crime, and then go to jail and ruin my life lol. Then the same fans DEMONIZE me People in general are hypocrites, they'll happily exploit those around them for their own self-aggrandizement. It's unfortunate that even well-known leftist philosophers are vulnerable to this ego-trap. Such is the ego-driven nature of mankind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/24 10:52 PM
105

Society owes you nothing, quit complaining. We're all in this together, now be a good soldier and do your part!! People in general are hypocrites, they'll happily exploit those around them for their own self-aggrandizement. It's unfortunate that even well-known leftist philosophers are vulnerable to this ego-trap. Such is the ego-driven nature of mankind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/24 10:48 PM
1

You make good points here, but I must shed light on the fact that we humans function under a greater force than just evolutionary biology and have far too strong cultural influences for us to ignore. We humans are an unnatural species, and thus biological determinism isn't sufficient to grasp nature nature. Notwithstanding that, we definitely see women receiving more empathy than men.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 08:46 PM
23

I can agree that the term "gynocentric" is very hyperbolic, but people having more empathy for women than men simply based on gender is a blatantly apparent phenomena. And I don't see your article addressing that.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 07:11 PM
31

To be fair, there are more male simps than not, the empathy gap being in favor of women isn't a feminist thing but a more species-wide phenomena. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/3O6cydMksn
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:09 PM
14

The tendency of men to worship any form of female beauty is indeed an ugly sight to see, complete spinelessness.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 05:07 PM
4

If you don't mind me asking, nordic country are you from? I've heard Finland is more socially conservative than the others.
/r/MensRights15/04/24 01:52 AM
7

If me using the word "conservative" triggers you that much then please swap it with "person who immigrants for everything". You think people who blame all their economic problems on immigrants don't exist? Because I've heard it far to many times from extreme conservatives; they'll blame the terrible economy on the lgbt, immigrants, welfare checks, "marxists" and pretty much everything else except capitalism. We call that a cognitive dissonance. Just like what you did in your mischaracterization …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 10:20 PM
-3

I never said men don't risk that, but realistically, don't women prisoners have a greater risk of getting raped than men prisoners of war?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 06:50 PM
1

The chicken or egg scenario comes in mind when analyzing the moral aspects of religions: does orthodoxy bring conservatism in men, or do conservative men embrace orthodoxy? Spinoza taught us that religion is a projection of our morality, thus I'd believe that conservatism precedes religious choice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 05:00 PM
1

I did not equate the treatment of jews in the 1930s to that of men's in 2024, rather I was highlighting the pathological phenomena of hatred, where it is not based on any facts but rather a purely emotional drive, while using naz#sm as an example. The ideological split between men and women is more nuanced than that of ethnic majority vs minority, the former is gender-related and can be can be far more prevalent and persistent than a an ethnicity-blame. Speaking of which, while it's true that Je…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/24 02:43 AM
1

Oh, you think the increase in female suicide today isn't an issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 01:23 AM
1

You're extremely difficult to talk to. Every time I open a conversation with you there's always heaps and gobs of bitterness projected form you. Different systems have different problems. Of course sufferings happened in the past much due to the authoritarian culture. But that doesn't mean we have no problems today. We should even especially pay attention to the globalized nature of today's society: mass immigration, large state interventions, global warmings, increased isolation and depression,…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 01:05 AM
1

In the past, there were real disincentives to ignoring shaming and moral scolding, like losing your job, status, family, community, freedom, resources or possessions. Now, there are none This is neoliberal culture, with capitalism is has all centered around financial gain, gone are the days of moralism. With the freedom to choose, you essentially opts for the option of having 10 birds in a tree vs 1 bird in your hand, bigger risk leads to bigger reward. We should all appreciate the liberal lifes…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 12:24 AM
8

That would only fuel Russian hegemony.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/24 11:33 PM
-53

Men aren't conscripted because of misandry or hatred of their gender, it is because they are seen as more physically capable, and unlike women are less likely to be targets of sexual assault in the case of captivity. And no, I do not support war conscriptions but rather demonstrated that misandry doesn't correlate with it. This is a response to Russia's advancement in Ukraine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/24 10:51 PM
5

You're not taking into account the self-loathing simple fathers who don't set boundaries on women. Furniture fathers as I like to call them.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:06 PM
4

It's always been like that. I can't think of any era in human history were a huge number of men weren't getting abandoned by society.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 07:04 PM
1

Six packs.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 06:46 PM
4

People change dramatically once they hit 30, it's the age that people realize that their youth is slowly fading. If a great deal of men are struggling to into the dating culture, are you conservative enough to claim that it's all their fault?
/r/MensRights13/04/24 06:46 PM
1

You're not arguing in good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/24 05:23 AM
10

American dating is wrecked. Get thine passports.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 04:35 AM
1

living linger happier lives Obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:49 PM
1

This month is only the 50th anniversary of women being able to get bank accounts and credit cards in their own names, in the US. That means that your grandmothers, or your great-grandmothers at the most, could not be financially independent. What percentage of men were financially independent pre-1940s?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 07:30 PM
1

🤪 😀
/r/MensRights12/04/24 12:49 PM
15

Lot of conservative women are often outspoken feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 02:27 AM
15

I believe it's analogous in terms of the Apex-fallacy when assigning any perceived privileged. For instance, most rich people are male, but most males are poor. Similarly, most rich people are whites while most of whites are poor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/24 12:03 AM
48

It's astonishing how little research, thought, and overall cultural recognition women's soft power has been given: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/bmqFK1h2Fz You can literally pick up a world of difference in terms of reactions people give towards actions committed by men compared to that by women, and that serves as proof of an undocumented phenomena of inherent biological sexism against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/24 10:54 PM
2

Not really, women's advocacy may not overlap that much with that of lgbt, perhaps some feminists see traditionalism as a common enemy as theirs and that LGBT's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 10:08 PM
3

Think of andro-centrism as Prussian militant culture and so on. Yes, the world is more gynocentric, but I'm inclined to be think that conservatives are more in favor of masculinity than progressives are, or at least have a less negative view of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 05:11 PM
2

I would characterize gynocentric liberalism as a period that enjoys peace, financial indulgence, and overall tranquility. Recently, Sweden has elected a right-winged government as a reaction to the influx of immigrants (many of whom inflicted violence on the society), here the society of Sweden takes a rigid conservative approach in their governance where concepts of tolerance are cast away much due to their negative experiences. Granted, "gyno" vs "andro" are subjective terms, we could leave it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 04:58 PM
1

I meant andro as in the spirit of masculinity, not necessarily men. Women can be masculine, the Italian prime minister is a great example of that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 04:53 PM
10

It's a similar case with regards to with enforcement personnel: they're lauded by red states, but blue states pay them far better. I'd say men are economically oppressed by capitalism, but culturally so by progressives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 04:36 PM
19

I'm included to believe that progressive vs conservative isn't necessarily a single spectrum, but rather a large set of radios. A radical feminist is progressive on women's issues, capitalism, and BLM, but could be conservative on transsexuality, immigrants, and men's issues. We'd have to look at the broad set of radios' structure and analyze the tendency here: seeing that on the broad scale men lean more conservative on more issues than women do, we could very much see a gender split.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 03:40 PM
9

I've noticed that society goes through a period of gynocentric liberalism and is then followed by androcentric rigidness. Not to suggest that history repeats itself, but it does rhyme in some manner, and this could be supported by the fact of how we humans are essentially by-products of how we're treated by others. For example, a man who's father was an extreme conservative could end up being of a very different character to his father, and the grandson would be an even further different persona…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 03:33 PM
1

Let's not waste our time gaining pleasure over the sufferings of distasteful feminists.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:06 PM
1

I would say masculinity is more so a state of mind rather than brute physical strength.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:05 PM
2

As a rule of thumb: a problem will sound as a foreign language to whoever does not experience it.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:03 PM
1

Because many emotional struggles men face stem from women, but they are never supported when talking about them. If you're abused by a male it's perfectly fine to voice that opinion to the world, but vice versa is not tolerated whatsoever. Essentially, men today are abused economically by capitalism, and culturally by feminism. Feminism in the early 20th century was concerned with granting women the basic needs to establish a life of dignity. Today's feminism is nothing more than a culture to bl…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:50 AM
46

I'm going to be the pessimist here, and refrain from progressive though not out of conservatism, but rather out of a lack if belief that any change is possible: the sufferings of men aren't due to a lack of awareness, I believe that the hatred men receive is a form of pure hatred rather than out of ignorance. Not to equate Feminism to Naz#sm, but when the latter sought the Jew to be his enemy, it isn't because of what Jews did, rather Naz#s wanted an enemy to magnify their culture of domination …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/24 02:46 AM
19

That's something. But what's worse is how men get freakin' arrested for doing the same with women: https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/s/zmL4NuDl40
/r/MensRights09/04/24 07:29 PM
27

It's another unfolding of the empathy gap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 07:17 PM
0

No need to force anyone to do anything. Simply encourage long term commitment instead of speed and commoditized dating.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 05:36 PM
57

They better get sued.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 05:13 PM
1

No need for forced marriages. Simply encourage women and men to wait for and respect marriage.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 03:34 PM
1

.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 02:36 PM
1

.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 02:35 PM
7

Women often do better in corporate sedentary jobs from what I noticed.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 01:47 PM
10

Exactly, You can't expect someone who harbors hatred and resentment against you to have good faith in a discussion. Feminist has a pathological case with its antagonism with men.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 01:42 PM
6

Toxicity is present in all humans, and knowing that men and women are different in their behaviors, we would need a word(s) to properly allude to the forms of toxicity that can be characterized by both genders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 12:32 PM
1

Don't exaggerate. I don't think it's a weird point at all, and I find your point more virtue-signaling than actual substance. If the vast majority of Russian support Putin then by all means why admonish their conscription, and what difference would it make if you do? If it's just one, or a very little amount that do oppose Putin's conscription, then of course I would support granting them asylum, though it seems that you attempted to paint me in a different light for some reason. Even then, glob…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 05:05 AM
1

That's not relevant to Ukraine's decision conscription.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 03:58 AM
1

I don't think it's a weird point at all, and I find your point more virtue-signaling than actual substance. If the vast majority of Russian support Putin then by all means why admonish their conscription, and what difference would it make if you do? If it's just one, or a very little amount that do oppose Putin's conscription, then of course I would support granting them asylum, though it seems that you attempted to paint me in a different light for some reason. Even then, global recognition of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 03:54 AM
1

I don't think it's a weird point at all. If the vast majority of Russian support Putin then by all means why admonish their conscription, and what difference would it make if you do? If it's just one, or a very little amount that do oppose Putin's conscription, then of course I would support granting them asylum, though it seems that you attempted to paint me in a different light for some reason. Even then, global recognition of Russia's conscription would be unwarranted as ratios matter: what's…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 03:53 AM
1

Any ideology taken to an extreme can kill a great number of people. An ideology examined in its extreme state shouldn't be ruled out as corrupt.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 12:42 AM
-35

Based on the fact that society was less digitalized back then, thus people often had a much smaller access to the population to sample. And with the lack of internet, people did not have the adequate means to understand esoteric political jargon, such for them terms such as "liberal" may mean many different things across the population sampled.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 10:59 PM
3

I'll be making a google survey to better understand the demographic of the sub sometime soon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 10:35 PM
17

Yeah I've come to see politics as "pick the least harmful poison" decision.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 10:22 PM
-52

Yes that's strange, I'd suggest that perhaps there was poor data collection decades ago, or perhaps we have redefined what it means to be "liberal".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 09:49 PM
10

South Korea's economic system is the East Asia model: an authoritarian form of State capitalism whereby the free market dynamics are merged with a far-reaching government. Such an overbearing political-economic system is likely to radicalize people ideologically. It's an extremely efficient system, hence why South Korea, Japan, and Singapore are some of the wealthiest in the world, and in many ways surpassing the west in terms of development. Of course that comes at a cost.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 09:45 PM
8

We could label that as Conservative socialism, it characterizes many of the socialist movements in third world countries such as the Ba'ath movement in the Arab nations in the 1970s.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 09:06 PM
24

I'm included to believe that progressive vs conservative isn't necessarily a single spectrum, but rather a large set of radios. A radical feminist is progressive on women's issues, capitalism, and BLM, but could be conservative on transsexuality, immigrants, and men's issues. We'd have to look at the broad set of radios' structure and analyze the tendency here: seeing that on the broad scale men lean more conservative on more issues than women do, we could very much see a gender split.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 09:04 PM
1

We must avoid a dichotomy here: the USA and Uk embodying corruption shouldn't let us to believe that their enemies are any good. It's often the case that evil exists on both sides of most conflicts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 08:37 PM
2

I agreed with most of your points, but there are many many support roles within the army that do not involve combat. Plenty of US army personnel never fired a bullet during the Iraq invasion, and so there would be many non-combat army support roles in Ukraine, what would prevent an average Ukrainian women from being qualified for them? There seems to be an unnecessary view of men being disposable here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 06:14 PM
1

Petty insults only discredit your opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 05:57 PM
2

Fair enough, yes we must pay attention to the Russian conscript as well, in so far as the individual isn't in support for Putin's regime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 05:15 PM
17

The problem with the red pill is that it takes a few truths and generalizes them to the point of absurdity. For instance, a simple truth that toxic femininity exists is translated by trp as "all women are toxic and will abuse you". Another truth is that western societies are gynocentric and will emotionally abuse men, trp spins this in a manner that one needs to support fascist Russia and be anti-liberal to give men space to peacefully exist. As far as the hatred Jordan Peterson gets: there are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 05:09 PM
1

Fair enough, then yes the attention should go for both Russian and Ukrainian men forced to join the war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 05:08 PM
–

That's correct, the difference here is that Russians have far more support for their government than the Ukrainians do, at least as far as what I've seen from Russians on social media.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 04:58 PM
1

I disagree here. Toxicity is present in all humans, and knowing that men and women are different in their behaviors, we would need a word(s) to properly allude to the forms of toxicity that can be characterized by both genders.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 03:25 PM
9

These Ukrainian men are forbidden from leaving the country.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 02:55 PM
1

This lack of empathy for men predominantly comes from anti-MRA, and those misandrist feminists go hand in hand with the conservative voices of traditionalism.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 02:03 PM
16

Young men in Ukraine are stuck being cannon-fodder for their nation. We are in a dilemma where we either put a stand to Putin's fascism or save the lives of hundreds of thousands of young men. The logic implemented here by supporters of Ukraine is that by sacrificing a smaller population (in this case young men) we'd be saving countless more lives from the hegemony of Russia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 01:55 PM
1

Is it twoXchrome? Aka the femcel sub?
/r/MensRights08/04/24 01:50 PM
1

You seem to be projecting your dating struggles onto my comment. Please take your disgusting incel nonsense elsewhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 03:43 AM
1

You seem to be projecting your dating struggles onto my comment. Please take your disgusting incel comment elsewhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 03:42 AM
1

You seem to be projecting your failures in dating here. I'm not interested in your incel nonsense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 03:39 AM
1

You see yourself as a statistic? Women won't like that of you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 03:35 AM
1

Can't tell if this is an insult but sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 03:30 AM
1

Is there any reason why you directed this comment towards me?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 03:24 AM
1

I think you misinterpreted my comment, I wasn't speaking of struggles with dating but just gave a definition to the "pill debate".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 03:16 AM
1

If you're someone's type, the real issue would be if you're living in a highly individualized society that not only gives little room for interacting with others, but also little room where there'd be high odds of meeting people of similar cultures. And in our increasingly globalist civilizations it is indeed more difficult to blend in with people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/24 03:11 AM
3

That's correct, the pill debate often involves matters of dating/marriage/attractiveness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/24 11:02 PM
1

To be honest, male therapists aren't any better, they're usually very feminist and biased.
/r/MenSupportMen07/04/24 10:30 PM
2

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2023/10/24/iceland-women-gender-pay-gap-strike-lessons/71298879007/#:~:text=Women%20walk%20out%20in%20Iceland,a%20lesson%20for%20the%20US&text=From%20classrooms%20to%20corporate%20offices,pay%20and%20gender%2Dbased%20violence. "(The strike) sends a very strong signal to what women do," Diehl said. "When work is underpaid or not paid at all, it's just taken for granted and is unseen. The benefit of this strike is it makes this kind of labor visible − the women'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/24 08:38 PM
1

This is radical. Such beliefs solve nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/24 08:33 PM
16

I really don't like how men's mental health is so disregarded by society to the point where the struggling men eventually become radicalized to the point of aggressiveness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/24 06:43 PM
1

I'm American myself, I'm interested in seeing my country emulating the system Singapore has in place where a free education system is designed primarily on student merit. Granted, Sing is pretty authoritarian so we'd have to tread with caution if we are to get ideas from them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/24 05:02 AM
3

I think many of what we perceive as solutions to the working class are often symptomatic treatments. For instance, the boost of the minimum wage isn't the root of the issue which is the rising cost of living. In the case of the discussion at hand, it isn't predatory loaning that should be our primary concern, rather it's the absurdly expensive tuition costs and the incessant requirement for a college degree for jobs that really don't need them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/24 04:46 AM
12

In my opinion it's cultural rather than legal, but other commentors can chime in. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/zDmN7fBDld
/r/MensRights06/04/24 11:11 PM
3

In my opinion it's cultural rather than legal, but other commentors can chime in. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/zDmN7fBDld
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/24 11:05 PM
1

Assuming something of a place you’ve never been to is the very definition of exoticism, aka fetishizing the unfamiliar Exoticism is the desire for the unfamiliar. Passporting is seeking out people of similair values, this is regardless of whether or not this assumption is right or Wrong. .... let me simplify it further. John goes to Mexico "Wow everything is different here I love it!" = Exoticism. VS John goes to Mexico "This Conservative society is the same as the lifestyle I seek, no different…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 05:47 PM
1

In the case of passport bros, they're going abroad and deliberately seeking a traditional woman to marry, while also paying heed that liberal women could exist in the country of their destination. So there isn't unfamiliarity here, it's just a matter of what kind of women is available in any given geographical location.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 05:26 PM
1

You did equate them to business exploitation in your previous comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/24 02:19 AM
1

Besides him and Chomsky there aren't many leftist philosophers that come to mind as of today. Unless you have some good examples.
/r/MensRights06/04/24 02:00 AM
1

More views means more ad revenue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/24 01:22 AM
–

Do you think it's fair to label any sort of relationship as fetishist based on nationality? Would you label a woman who dates a Mexican immigrant who she met in Mexico, after finding our that Mexican culture is less materialistic than American, as a fetishist? Also, do you really think you can use capitalist critique onto the nuances of dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:20 PM
9

Thank you OP.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/24 08:46 PM
1

It all depends on the woman. Some of them are good others are cruel. Moreover, beyond the good intentions of a specific person the unintentional ignorance could undermine the usefulness of their advice.
/r/MenSupportMen05/04/24 04:20 PM
1

I think you missed my point.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:10 PM
3

Would you say the elites are spending a significant amount of time fretting over a sort of master-plan to keep the masses brainwashed, as opposed to vacationing in Monaco and golfing in Miami? My point is that people overestimate the intellectual and ambitious effort of those elites, regardless of whether it's Musk or Old money.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/24 03:51 PM
2

What rule did they break?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/24 02:11 PM
29

They're the sexual equivalent of the poor class voting for the far-right buying into trickle down theory. They have high hopes that by dismantling monogamy and exclusivity in relationships they'll finally have some drops of attention from a woman that isn't disgusting looking like the ones they currently settle for.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 02:03 PM
1

Only hard times can create strong men.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:45 AM
1

Most young men today are skeptical of feminism, this is despite the bombardment of feminist propaganda in the recent decades. Culture isn't something we can forcefully align but it's rather a force that moves on its own/
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:17 AM
2

Clown houses and weird operas have been around for centuries. Medieval kings always kept a group of jesters to keep the court entertained.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:15 AM
17

I mentioned that you cherry-picked examples of powerful men who had a support group of loyal followers. Here we speak of 2024, and leave aside the archaic times: firstly we can clearly make a distinction here between two groups: men of individualistic conservative background, and those of progressive liberalism. An example like Trump belongs to the former, whereas folks like Jimmy Fallon belong to the latter. Mainstream society today in the west is predominantly progressive and liberal, and with…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:01 AM
7

By analyzing statistics on how many men abandon their families vs those are unfairly burdened with alimony and child support then the argument could be settled.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:24 AM
2

Filthy people have always existed, social media just accentuates their presence.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:58 AM
23

Here's a good resource on the problems that affect men, which do not receive adequate attention from mainstream society: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/2c8Cg3Egv1 As the other commentor pointed out: you're cherry picking wealthy and powerful figures in history and casting the results of their life to the overall male population. Moreover, those men were lauded by a small niche group while being detested by the mainstream, so your argument is missing some nuance.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:56 AM
2

They will learn it on their own, only reality can teach tough truths, schools cannot do that.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:51 AM
1

Conservatism is self-reliance, it's a pretty straight-forward concept, I don't know why you're not getting it. I'm not sure how it's my "projection", I just read your words and made sense of them. . Conservative = self-reliance, don't blame society. . Progressivism = problems are systemic, let's examine society. I don't think you're qualified to be giving such strong opinions if you aren't interested in learning these simple concepts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 04:00 PM
2

Conservatism is self-reliance, it's a pretty straight-forward concept, I don't know why you're not getting it. I'm not sure how it's my "projection", I just read your words and made sense of them. . Conservative = self-reliance, don't blame society. . Progressivism = problems are systemic, let's examine society. I don't think you're qualified to be giving such strong opinions if you aren't interested in learning these simple concepts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 03:54 PM
6

I don't blame you for being offended at that user's aggressive message, but posting people's private chats is incredibly predatory, and the fact that it's socially acceptable to mock mentally-ill men and call them "incel" is all the proof we need to see that men's issues are systemic and not something an individual man can just work on by himself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 03:48 PM
–

I agree. No one else is responsible for your loneliness or sense of community. If you suggest that a person's problems are entirely self-inflicted and within a person's control to change then surely you subscribe to the notion of one changing their own life rather than examining society holistically. Granted, I do agree with self-responsibility and individualism, but your opinion was rather explicit with its conservative lens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 03:31 PM
6

The ideologies can be analyses from their two elements: economic and cultural. Neoliberalism can be implemented in a heavily regulated fashion to form a welfare state type, in which case I find it difficult to consider it right-wing instead of center left. Socially however, neoliberalism can be either of two camps, just depends on what the elites and corporations fancy and want to virtue signal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 03:15 PM
8

"we obviously don't mean aLL men" Just the ones they disagree with.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 02:49 PM
38

I despise cancel culture but that woman is just evil and poses a threat to people around her.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 02:48 PM
33

Financial elites aren't always right-wing, many are quite leftist on their social values. Elen degeneres comes to mind as an elitist leftist who just virtue-signals. I'd also add that the puppet-master theory is not realistic: the idea that there's an elite up there that pulls the strings and decided the changes is greatly overestimating the intelligence and self-awareness of elites who really aren't that remarkable (Bezos, musk etc..). If a lot of women are embracing a toxic form of feminism, i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 02:25 PM
22

Left vs right ideology within a human being can be accurately visualized as a large panel full of different radios. A radical feminist may be leftist on women's issues, healthcare, and lgbt, but right-winged on men's issues, immigrants, and religious minorities. Political ideologies are rarely in binary form.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 02:20 PM
–

Not to discredit your opinion, but it's rather conservative in its thinking, "set your house in order before you critique the world".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 01:28 PM
–

Are you willing to apply this logic to women who are struggling mentally and emotionally?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/24 04:37 AM
1

The problem is that "gender roles" aren't a stone-set list of ideals, but rather it's a nebulous characterization of what we deem as the strong male provider. Us taking a stand against traditional male gender roles could risk us, while attacking the bits that harm men, to attack the aspects of traditional masculinity that actually benefit men, such as being ambitious, prioritization of self and family, taking a stand for yourself instead of "being the modern gentleman who has no enemies".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/24 10:19 PM
21

I would say the problem lies in feminist ideology, which is harbored by both men and women, so it is not women specifically who cause men's problems. The other contributor to men's issues today is neoliberalism, which is far more significant than feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/24 05:04 AM
15

The primary cause is unbridled capitalism. Males in their teens and early twenties are far too powerless to have any sort of macro-influence on society, and it's crucial to point out that those tycoons and male billionaires likely aren't suffering from loneliness or despair of any kind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/24 04:12 AM
5

A particular virtue sharing commonality with an age old tradition shouldn't prompt us to denigrate it. Kim Jung Un studied in Switzerland, of course this wasn't his father's loyalty to the age old tradition of wealthy families sending their pampered kids to western European universities as was the case amongst many Russian aristocratic families in the 1800s; rather it overlapped between the cases of Kim's father and the Russian aristocrats where the geographical tilt of education was in favor of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/24 03:14 AM
5

This is a tough truth indeed. Capitalism is extremely corrosive to society, but without some adherence to it there's a grave risk of loosing an acceptable quality of life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 07:39 PM
4

You make good points here. My problem is that I'm having a hard time putting into words the idea brewing in my head. It's true, humans are greatly empathetic compared to other species. That empathy however is wrapped in a dark cloak of inescapable Solipsism, To put into words how a user on this sub brilliantly described it "the vast majority of people aren't interested in justice on a consistent basis, but will happily bend the languege of justice to increase their own power and privilege". It s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 05:29 PM
1

The graph shows women scoring notably higher than men, that's what OP tried to allude to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 04:53 PM
5

I've been thinking of making a post about this, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Akr_CvzAmkQ The complete lack of empathy for struggling men displayed by both right and left wing individuals have broken my belief in a possible utopia in the future, where all humanity acts as a unified family of friendship and selflessness. Perhaps selfishness is indeed the primary and defining trait across all humanity, and the concept of universalized empathy ought to be reevaluated for the sake of a realistic ana…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 04:32 PM
6

Does anyone else feel some sort of societal pressure to atone for other men? Almost completely so in every gender-related discussion. The essence of misandry, like any other form of bigotry, is collective punishment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 04:30 PM
39

The difference here is that women's hedonism is pointed out by the red-pill culture, whereas the concept of men's indulgence in meaningless pleasure seems to be well-embedded in nation-wide popular thought.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 02:18 PM
5

Yes what you said is true. I was referring to the vitriolic people rather than just the indifferent ones, and I think only a political radical would consider neutral people to be his enemy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 01:46 PM
62

It's pretty much traditionalism mixed with feminism. And contrary to what the noble brow philosophers would want you to believe: the two philosophies are well compatible in many ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 12:22 PM
47

The empathy gap prevents people from critiquing women in many ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 12:21 PM
22

I think hateful people are just more vocal, emotionally healthy people probably don't make posts about such shallow matters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 11:58 AM
2

I'd say most humans are inherently conservative, save for the issue that has brought fear and anxiety to their life, and it's that issue that they're particularly leftist/progressive about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 03:59 AM
4

It is said that even though lots of black people vote Democrat, they are still holding socially conservative views. Many Arabs seem to do that as well, they're attracted to the fiscal-liberalism rather than social-liberalism, and still seeking to buck the xenophobia that some extreme republicans harbor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 03:57 AM
2

I've noticed this too. Many conservative traditional women seem incredibly leftist of women's issues exclusively.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 03:56 AM
3

Women most affectedTM
/r/MensRights01/04/24 02:59 PM
17

In my view, political movement are built around a particular enemy, as opposed to choosing one to scapegoat. For instance, republicans in the US are reactionary towards immigration, and thus they're essentially built from scratch to be an opposition to immigration.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/24 05:04 AM
96

I suspect liberal culture tends to have some inherent misandry, and this creates a counter-culture amongst men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/24 04:44 AM
2

No disagreement, but my point went beyond the context of military service. For example, an event of village-wide evacuation in the case of natural disasters would still hold the "women and children first" attitude, and this wouldn't have an influence of modern capitalist culture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 10:09 PM
29

Imperialist culture views men as cannon fodder It's a cross-cultural phenomenon. You're likely to see contempt for men in cosmopolitan Paris, rural China, and primitive amazon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 03:17 PM
44

What I've come to learn is that "women most affected", is code for "women are affected and I'm blind to men's sufferings".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 02:03 PM
2

Many comments are indeed just rage-bait. Considering how misandrist reddit is in general, that translates over to that sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/24 03:59 AM
1

I would think that feminism falls under a broader umbrella concerning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/24 09:58 PM
-4

I would say that it's more about multiculturalism, as a society becomes more prosperous due to free market dynamics, that inevitably attracts people from all corners of the world to partake in the economic machine and make a living. This huge variety of backgrounds and culture will need a heavy beuraucrasy to govern our behaviors towards one another. The mitigation here isn't necessarily our behaviors, rather it's how we recognize the identity of others and interact with them, as highlighted by …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/24 06:01 PM
-3

I would say that prosperity of a nation is contingent on political correctness: the self-admission into a culture of cosmopolitanism. That entails a clear respect and adherence to the boundaries set by all norm-abiding participants of the society, which fosters a sort of social bureaucracy to govern our manners and ways of recognizing others. This bring capital prosperity, as successful commerce is strongly contingent on the participation of as many agents as possible. It also fosters a space of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/24 05:25 PM
1

It's imperfect but it's as reliable as it gets. I'm all for Chomsky readings but the US is still a beacon of democracy in the face of Russia and China.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/24 06:33 AM
1

I still haven't seen a good case of men's in-group bias matching that of women's. Where would be the male equivalent of twoxchrome that has 13mm users? Or the fact that is are an army of male simps ready to die for women. A dog isn't evil because they bark and snap after being hurt, and people aren't evil for doing the same thing. I don't agree with this morality. A dog is a dog, but humans can choose to not do evil, and evil isn't something we should tolerate. Granted, it's deciding what's evil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/24 12:19 AM
1

Fair points you made. That's because they're not actually men's rights supporters, they're just grifters. You can't even argue it's cognitive dissonance...it's literally just "let me tell men shit and they'll give me money". Fucking snake oil. I don't believe in the puppet-master theory. The top leader are usually just as deluded and in-group as his followers, he's just extra-confident much due to the power and relief from common troubles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/24 12:13 AM
5

Admitting you need help is weak and shameful. Because so many of us think this way. Would you think that some people are apt to react aggressively if a man speaks his honest opinion about feeling alienated from society?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 11:37 PM
20

I speak on my own behalf: I'm too tired after working 50 hours a week to do anything else. Economics strongly influence culture, more so than the reverse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 05:31 PM
1

Have you not seen how those red-pillers worshiped that Italian prime minister for her right winged beliefs, while nauseating at liberal Trudeau? I don't want to invalidate your experiences: I know evil men exist. Though it is my knowledge of human nature that words people express at moments of anger and humiliation (such as the redpillers/incels/mgtows etc...) aren't actually ones that they'd follow through. Have a look at Peterson, Richard Cooper, and Tommassi, they all send their daughters to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 05:28 PM
3

Fair enough. My belief of the in-group inherent in women stems from the existence of a fierce pro-woman sentiment in many men of both conservative and liberal circles. Such advocacy is not reciprocated in the same magnitude vice versa, as far as I noticed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 04:55 PM
7

I agree with your moderate stance, the issue I find is the absurdity of how men's rights and well-being are a taboo subject in any discussion. Both conservatives and liberals seems to view men as cannon-fodder, with the latter being subtle about it. It really breaks your faith in humanity when you talk of help for men, in a matter that doesn't involve women's benefit, and get accused of fascism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 01:40 PM
8

Don't believe these fluff surveys. Claiming to be empathetic doesn't make you so: I'm not inclined to believe that empathy is gender-related. I also think it's incredibly ironic that men posses in-group bias here when the evidence to suggest otherwise is overwhelming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 01:01 PM
26

I would suspect that this is due to economic factors more so than cultural, not to underestimate the latter. A "death of despair" as it's called. The only hope to break the stranglehold of wealth from the hands of the elites is through worker unions and pro-middle class initiatives
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/24 02:19 AM
0

You're a bit slow aren't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 11:32 PM
1

Interesting, You don't in good faith do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 10:56 PM
1

I didn't quote you on the girls part, I just called attention to the overall paragraph. The focus here is on the child with their relationship with their parent. I don't see much evidence to suggest that such a household void of one of the two parent to have much of an effect on the child. I'm not sure why you'd have that feeling.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 08:32 PM
1

Nonsense. As usual a leftist idpol expert wants his cannon fodder in check.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 07:48 PM
1

Can't*
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/24 07:13 PM
1

Their idea of women mot getting whatever they want, whenever they want is oppression.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/24 07:13 PM
1

Shocker.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 05:38 PM
1

I treat feminists almost the same as I would treat a racists or a homophobe. They have severe mental limitations based on a fallacy that they have created in their mind with an echo chamber.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 04:26 PM
5

Biological determinism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 03:28 PM
0

These For-profit personnels help clients identify problems in their life, they don't really solve any of them nor do they cause cultural shifts of improvements.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 01:14 PM
1

She's exactly what you'd expect her to look like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/24 02:50 AM
7

I'm not totally against feminism; I like the economics of it: help women get educations and careers etc... my disdain is at its cultural nuances, where the ideology essentially encourages women to utilize men as pawns for their own happiness. I first wave feminism is totally sound in its morality, can't say the same for the modern editions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 11:07 PM
2

I spoke of the concept of arranged dating in a vacuum, not pointing to any actual practice of it. In other words my concept was made in theory. My distinction between an arranged marriage and one that is forced is by emphasizing the participants' choice to accept/reject in the former's case. My suggestion here is that the reliance on social circles, extended families, church, and communities for the building of a potential marital partner can provide men with a better alternative to meet partner…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 06:51 PM
5

Purplepill.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 06:06 PM
2

Semantics: Arranged doesn't mean forced though, it's like a matchmaking process on tinder, but instead of dehumanizing digital screens you meet in person and decide whether or not you reject the dating candidate. Relying on a social circle to meet a potential partner is not oppressive given that the choice to accept/reject is there. That's why I asked whether it's arranged or force marriage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 05:51 PM
26

I completely avoid that sub after I saw the unbelievable misandry on it. Save your energy and don't bother.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 05:49 PM
13

OP I encourage you to add a comment to further elaborate as I believe this sub will remove any posts that do not include a short summary of the topic at hand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 05:24 PM
99

What are you expecting? A misandrist sub will banned you for pointing out their baseless hatred. I would advice everyone on this sub to completely boycott any feminist and misandrist people; you can't change a dipshit of a person. Imagine trying to debate a racist with facts and logic, it won't work for their hatred is driven by ego and emotions that stand in paradox with any logic. Boycott the feminists and stand your ground. Btw, it's true: as a man, no one will ever care about your mental hea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 05:16 PM
4

Copy pasted from a different post as I believe they made a good account of this matter: With out getting killed for saying it, research also shows that many women’s suicide attempts aren’t to kill themselves but often a grasp for attention. Either from those around them or from the public in a dangerous situation. The health care community defines 6 types of suicide attempts (this is different the 4 types of suicide (egoistic, anomic, fatalistic, and altruistic)). And something like being in an …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 01:15 PM
6

You refer to the stresses of an arranged or forced marriage?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 01:12 PM
4

Do you listen to feminists? If you did you'd also belief that 1/4 women in America get harassed on a consistent basis, and that college rape culture is so prevalent that alarmist action is nessecary. If it's in your belief that rape culture is the primary predictor of female suicide, then you'd need to consolidate that with the feminist claim of western civilization being rife with male domination.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 12:46 PM
6

If arranged marriage were common in past centuries of the western world, we could see data suggesting that women's suicide was almost on par with that of men's, granted this theory could be limited by the taboos and religious thinkings of previous times.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 04:01 AM
3

In India is it arranged or forced marriage that is the majority of cases?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 03:40 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/Infographics/s/3AMJxp68Se From this post. The source of the info is the WHO.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 03:40 AM
8

If that's true then we can conclude that it does not exist in western countries where most suicides are male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 03:25 AM
3

I didn't quite understand the second portion of your sentence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 03:10 AM
1

Girls especially (and boys) who grew up with single dads and no mom feel like they missed relatability and unique wisdom imparted I think you're placing too much importance on the availability of parents here, in a society with strong social safety nets like Iceland and Norway, the void of parenthood wouldn't be too much of an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 02:46 AM
1

It could also be due to people's tendency to become more conservative as they grow older, by then they just embrace the mold set out by their older generations, which on your example happened to be muslims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 02:03 AM
1

Both right-wing and left can embody individualism. The four quadrants, though imperfect, can give us a good idea of what most ideologies can look like. https://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 01:56 AM
1

Here we can ask as to why more men resort to OLD than women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 01:54 AM
3

Same here, I'm from Asia currently in America. I do feel that America is more individualistic. Granted I do have cultural factors that contribute to me not fitting into America, but I also wager that America's car-centric infrastructure and corporatism culture that leaves little bedrock for communion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/24 12:09 AM
1

NATO isn't perfect by any means but it sure as hell is more grounded than Putin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 10:30 PM
9

It is, but would you say the rural culture there is as individualistic and a metro area of the US? Let's put aside the keywords of "liberalism" "westernism" as I used them too casually. My point here id that individualism is what is primarily contributing to the modern isolation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 09:37 PM
9

Would you suggest it's easier for you to build a family and social circle in New York city or rural Italy? The staggering divorce rates, isolation, and overall distain toward the opposite gender prevalent in the US should tell us there is a flaw in the culture. I did not mean liberalism in the legal sense, more so with regards to individualistic vs collectivist culture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 08:51 PM
71

I wasn't ready to see the numbers. I just imagined a stadium full of women saying no. Odds are, a lot of those women would probably say yes if they met you in person, that's the toxicity of social media, it puts people into delusional states. I'm often progressive with regards to technology's development, but social media is one area that has done more harm than gone over the years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 07:14 PM
29

I know this is a left wing space, and leftism has done poorly to evade the thought-constraining political correctness, but I must say this: dating is simply not worth it in the western world. The hyper-individualistic "entrepreneurial" culture of liberal western societies simply has no proper bedrock for the fostering of stable families and communitarian humanist relationships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 07:12 PM
1

Many Leftisms who claim to be anti-idpol are in name only. Try talking about men's issues and watch the vehement backlash. Their focus is significantly less focused on economics than as much as they claim for it to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 03:28 PM
1

I'd suggest that you don't look at religions as a sort of closed jar with distinct features, rather it is a set of characteristics not necessarily inherent to it. For example, plenty of atheists do hold beliefs and morals towards life that strongly mimic abrahamic beliefs, even without any sort of early-life indocinatdon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 03:26 PM
3

I suspect republicans here are just being against universal healthcare.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 02:15 PM
7

Even worse, men would be the first to shame you if you mentioned gender inequality here. This is one of the biggest discouragements I have with regards to Masculanism. It seems to me that women in general possess the common sense to support moderate feminism for the sake of their welfare, but men... even the progressive/liberal ones seem to embrace the physical/emotional cannon-fodder role. What I notice is that the traditional spirit of masculinity had almost persisted through a metamorphoses: …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/24 02:12 PM
41

That's manhood of the 21st century: full responsibility, no authority.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 11:57 PM
2

Equality for thee but not for me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/24 11:54 PM
1

Fathers won't be much of help if women are still bashed and insulted in society, maybe I misread your comment but you seem to really minimize women's issues bur suggesting that a father is all it takes for a good life.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 08:59 PM
1

The west vastly overestimates Russia's competency and capabilities.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:18 PM
1

Men ought to have a clear idea of how contemporary marital trends are working. Family units are crucial for the well-being of an individual. This sub is for men's rights, but it doesn't mean we cannot discuss cultural trends.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 07:18 PM
9

In the west the vast majority of homelessness is male. In the Middle East it’s female. Can you share the source for the second claim? The middle east is vast, is it war-torn Syria that you're referring to?
/r/MensRights25/03/24 05:55 PM
0

Your attitude is precisely was OP was referring to.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 12:23 AM
6

I recognize your username. You're from r/purplepilldebate lol Do you support men forfeiting their obligation of fatherhood that could be enforced by the government? I think it's reasonable that a man should not force a woman to choose whether or not to have an abortion, but we can't force men to be fathers either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/24 09:38 PM
1

I recognize your username. You're from r/purplepilldebate lol Do you support men forfeiting their obligation of fatherhood that could be enforced by the government?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/24 09:32 PM
2

Simp men can never satisfy women. Let nature take its course.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 05:26 PM
5

Social media is a plague I'm distancing myself from.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 05:26 PM
3

I respect you courage to make that post.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 05:23 PM
9

Because people get uncomfortable when women are criticized.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 05:23 PM
23

Pretty much, I have accepted that misandry is almost inherent in human nature.
/r/MensRights24/03/24 05:22 PM
40

Disliking DBZ is a mental illness sorry. RIP Akira ❤️
/r/MensRights24/03/24 05:14 PM
6

That's what I wondered as well. Capitalism creates stress, alienation, and resentment. The control of that economic system could alleviate the stresses associated with labor exploitation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/24 05:34 AM
4

That is correct, I have noticed that Nordics' geography and resources definitely give them a proper platform to start the welfare policies to begin with. That shouldn't let us loose hope with welfare for others nation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/24 11:13 PM
1

Agreed. It is always, always, men's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:15 PM
2

Nothing is happening. Being a man is just that: living in a world where you will never be cared for.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter