TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Elvick Archive

View 2 posts and 3,206 comments by Elvick on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,206 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Haven't really found another place free from feminist influence to discuss men's issues sadly. If I had I would never come here.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 12:33 PM
6

Circumcision has no adverse effects when done by a licensed practitioner This is straight up false. Skin bridges aren't adverse? Having too much skin removed so later in life your erections are painful? etc That's just two potential risks of MGM. And that's with "licensed practitioners". Because the procedure is problematic. Not even getting into death. Which we don't truly know how many deaths, since many children who die from blood loss, infection, and other related problems from the circumcis…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 04:57 PM
17

That's why I barely come here anymore. Such a shame the mods don't care to keep the sub more relevant, and less "low effort"... despite that flat out being the first rule of the sub.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 04:54 PM
4

if I have a son, I'm going to get him circumcised because I want women to enjoy putting his dick in their mouths. I wouldn't be doing it for them, I'd be doing it for them for him lol This is so asinine. As a gay man, stop. You know nothing about what somebody looks for in a penis. Penises are like faces, each one is different. Some are ugly, regardless of being intact or not. Some are beautiful. And having talked to quite a few women... some don't think any penises are attractive, so by that lo…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:41 PM
5

You're comparing getting a scrape on your arm Funny you say that as that's how minimal some forms of FGM are. A simple ceremonial pin prick. So I suppose your'e okay with that form of FGM? After all it's far less severe than removal of the foreskin. Or are you holding a double standard... I wonder. Foreskin is more comprable to the eyelids by the way. Our eyes would probably adapt to it, but that doesn't make it okay.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:27 PM
4

am biased in my experiences too tho, cuz my little brothers were not circumcised and they both had complications that ensued from the foreskin that needed to be treated later in their lives. Look up skin bridges. A potential side effect of MGM. Or look up the men who have had too much skin removed from their penis so in adulthood when they get an erection it's painful. There are billions of intact men who have no issue with it. The main issue in first world where MGM is common, is that people do…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:24 PM
6

FGM can be as minimal as a pin prick. So that is mutilation, but the complete removal of the foreskin is not? You realize the foreskin is FUSED to the head of the penis right? At birth it's fused, in the process of "not mutilating" they tear the foreskin from the head of the penis. Then they proceed to cut it off. That's not mutilation? But a pin prick is. But removal of the clitoral hood is? Which is a similar in terms of removing a "useless piece of skin" as some claim. Even though that's less…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:18 PM
6

Am I wrong to feel this way? Yes. Go watch one and listen to the boy's blood-curdling screams until he passes out from shock. It's barbarianism that we've normalized by giving it a fancy word so we can distance ourselves from the reality of "circumcision". Women are happy to have had it done as well. Think it looks better, feels better and is cleaner. And they can't wait to do it to their daughters. Are they wrong? If they're wrong, so is your boyfriend. (they are wrong, that's the answer) Don't…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:16 PM
7

FGM comes in many forms. Some of it is literally a ritual pin prick. That is not "infinitely, infinitely worse" than the complete removal of the foreskin. Even the most comparable FGM to MGM, the removal of the clitoral hood, is better in certain terms. Since the foreskin has 20k+ nerve endings in it and the clitoral hood doesn't. And the foreskin is more important to the penis than the clitoral hood to the vagina.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:07 PM
3

I don't care if an adult does it, in a country with easy access to information. I say that because African men are mislead by westerners with false information and the men in question don't have easy access to different information. So think that doing it will help against the spread of STDs and HIV, but it's not going to do shit to help them. If you live in say the US and want to cut it off because of bad info, and do, and regret it later then that's your bad for not using the internet. Sucks t…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:05 PM
7

FGM often includes cutting off the clitoris entirely. Not it does not "often" include that. That's one of the rarest forms of FGM.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:01 PM
5

Actually give it a few years and they'd be just like these idiots now. I mean in countries where there is FGM, it's socially acceptable and it's a kind of rite of passage that women perpetuation on their daughters. They think it "looks better, feels better, is cleaner"... sound familiar? But yes, if it was introduced right now it'd be outrage. It was attempted in the US actually when MGM was introduced but didn't catch on at all. Both were to curb masturbation. The stupid justifications came aft…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:00 PM
205

Until the mods do something about it, so never.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:52 PM
2

I haven't, but I'm gay and gay men have the least amount of domestic violence. Plus, I've only been in one long term relationship which I'm still in now. 10 years so far.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:50 PM
3

because they are still being shot in the street by uncaring cops, This is why "intersectional feminism" doesn't work. u/StrawberrySpringg already covered the rebuttable to all your claims. In order to focus on the "minorities" you ignore anyone who doesn't fit your mold. Even when they are also affected by these things. Which leads to not really understanding the problem, because you've now framed it as "hate" for x, y, z even when it happens to everyone. And in the case of police killing citize…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:46 PM
3

I really really dislike second and third wave, specially with “I hate men” attitudes. But I love intersectional feminist ideas, specially racially inclusive types. Identity politics are why we've been on a fast decline backwards. Going "YOU BLACK" "YOU GAY" "YOU WOMEN" etc and pointing out our arbitrary differences has done nothing but make everything worse. Listen to Morgan Freeman. Stop talking about it. All this "first female this", "first gay that", "first lesbian black whatever" shit is div…
/r/MensRights11/11/18 02:32 PM
4

Cosmetic genital mutilation is bad. It is black and white. You can think it's the bees knees all you want, but you're as right as the people who say the Earth is Flat. Just because you can have a "viewpoint" doesn't mean it's valid. Mutilating infant genitals for no reason is bad. That's all there is to it. Thinking otherwise is just a sad attempt to justify or desensitize the masses to the fact it's bad. Go watch one and hear those screams and get back to me that it's not black and white. Genit…
/r/MensRights05/11/18 09:22 AM
2

Then she said "why are you complaining when there are girls in Africa who have their genitals cut so they can't feel any pleasure". She didn't understand that cutting the genitals of boys also harms their sexual pleasure and the natural function of the penis for life. She said she did it because dad wanted it done and "better to do it when they're young so they won't remember". I hate when people bring up Africa. MGM happens there too. Everywhere with FGM has MGM, but only MGM exists independent…
/r/MensRights05/11/18 09:17 AM
9

These people need etymology lessons.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 09:05 AM
0

Of course it's not inherently toxic. In yet many self described MGTOW are indeed toxic. Go to any woman's youtube video about "why I'm not a feminist" and you'll find a lot of MGTOW generalizing women, treating the youtuber as a con artist trying to manipulate men and that "all men" should either adopt MGTOW or basically suffer the "consequences". It's become a religion to many who subscribe to it. The label itself makes no sense. It's oxymoronic. A group of men going their own way? Like being i…
/r/MensRights05/11/18 08:58 AM
2

I haven't been here in ages, the mods don't do shit. So low effort posts get a lot of traction and since they do, it attracts the type of people who have nothing substantive to add to discussion. Which means a lot of generalizations and hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 08:53 AM
20

From her twitter in 2013 Waiting for my long lost son @JimmyBennett in the hotel room: I cry, I sweat, I pace, I tremble. I am alive. Vile.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:47 AM
2

I read the comments in the video and it wasn't clear even there with people asking, that's why I qualified it in case it is bait.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 05:00 AM
15

Disgusting. He's not even a teen who looks somewhat older, he looks younger than his age based on the thumbnail. Assuming that picture is them. He looks like 14 or something. Nasty vile woman shouldn't be allowed near her own kid.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 03:44 AM
3

No, the argument was that men could do business there and this denied women access. Except that's exactly what they do to justify shutting down men's groups and businesses, but defend female only spaces and demand more for "safety". Safety from what I wonder... hmmmmmmmmmm.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 04:43 PM
2

Feeling uneasy, Christal decided to share the image in a mums groups to get their perspective where she was flooded with positive feedback. However, what she did find was many mothers admitting their male partners wouldn't feel comfortable sharing an intimate photo with their baby on social media. "It honestly hurts to think that men won't post pictures or do things in public because of someone assuming things to be sinister instead of what it really is." It's sad she was made uneasy by one craz…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:44 AM
2

That was handled better than I thought given it was about emotional abuse specifically. Nice to see.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:34 AM
14

No. I'm saying that MGM in first world countries still can result in a penis accidentally being cut entirely off and the boy dying. You know nothing about MGM or FGM and should stop defending the mutilation of children with your ignorant bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:32 AM
3

We don't need more government in our bedrooms. "It can still be rape even if the victim doesn't resist" Instead of passing laws we should be teaching people to simply say what they mean with sex. If you can't say "no" or "yes" to sex when it's gearing up toward sex (ie; foreplay) then you aren't ready for sex. But we can't stop people from having sex, so let's encourage people to actually be smarter. Rather than make most sex illegal because reasons. "If she's naked actively taking part and enjo…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:26 AM
7

Because men are viewed as dangerous in those circumstances... look at the arguments against men's spaces and clubs. It's always about how it's dangerous. And that's just a private space or a club on campus. An entire protest filled of men wouldn't go over any differently. Did you even read Karen's comment? She talks about how society views men as dangerous in there.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:17 AM
8

Think it's more women > girls > pets > boys > objects > men With an argument that objects could come before boys even. And depending on the age range we're talking for "boy" it's as easy as domestic violence shelters turning away boys of a certain age because they could be "dangerous". Women can make more children. Nature didn't guarantee girls would make it to child bearing years. So women were more valuable than girls. Women having more children was a more reasonable assumption than girls not …
/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:11 AM
1

That's not a response to anything. Enjoy making your pointless lists.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:47 AM
7

There was a female politician a good few years ago that tweeted a picture of a baby who undergone genital mutilation. And she took a stand against FGM and how terrible it was. Turns out the picture was actually of MGM. Literally the only way people will care is if they first believe it's a girl whose genitals are bleeding. Otherwise they don't give a single fuck. It's disgusting. It's really not hard to be opposed to all genital mutilation. Everywhere FGM happens MGM also happens.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:45 AM
13

First off, you’re comparing some savage Somalian tribesman hackin off FGM comes in many forms, some as minimal as a pin prick. What you describe is not the most common form of FGM at all. So I suppose you're fine with FGM of lesser forms. Like the removal of the clitoral hood, pin pricks, etc? After all, it's "relatively harmless". Oh but "it's totally different" because reasons. If you acknowledge that FGM isn't just the massive strawman you've constructed. Because saying all genital mutilation…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:42 AM
2

most anti-feminists are righties. No they are't. Feminism is the extreme left. It's just varying degrees of extreme. Being anti-feminism is being anti-extremism. Most people accept every single belief from their political tribe whole cloth. lol no they don't.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 12:36 AM
2

Men who are unattractive to a particular woman yet try to pretend they are doing "100% the same actions" as someone she is attracted to are creepy as hell. This is an observable phenomenon. It's not even exclusive to women, attractive people get treated better and get away with more things than ugly people do. Just so happens we're talking about women and "sexual harassment" accusations toward men. Ignoring or being insensitive to the signs of interest or rejection which are present from the fir…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 09:15 AM
10

Not really. There's clear bias against men deemed "creepy", even if their actions are 100% the same as someone attractive and/or rich. It's not about "the flirting" all the time, but the person actually doing the flirting. And women can still lie about sexual harassment anyway.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:06 AM
6

Has more to do with the fact that you don't take a shit in urinals. Hence toilets being closed in male restROOMS* too. Not sure what the difference in changing rooms are supposed to be. At least in stores, it's always the same. Every school I went too the locker rooms were the same. *edit; lol, restaurants... fail. Too much Kitchen Nightmares.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:27 AM
1

They literally said "also citing". I fail to see how the two reasons contradict each other. "We're serving pie." "We're also serving cake". GOT'EM CONTRADICTION I think this is a useless article to be posted here. But at least have a good reason.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:15 AM
1

I don't have to worry about a cop racially profiling me You're more likely to be profiled than a minority woman. It's a men's issue with a racial component on top of it. I don't have to worry about making less money due to my gender Neither do woman. And arguably, you do if you want to go into an area with sexist hiring practices like STEM which favors female applicants over male. I mean, "affirmative action". Discrimination is fine as long as it's "for the greater good". The pay gap myth is jus…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 07:08 AM
3

Men appointed by the primary voting power of women. It doesn't matter if they're men, they represent women's issues. Which is why women vote for them. The same government body which was entirely men was the one that gave women the privilege to vote (it's not a right they earn like men who still to this day have to sign up for conscription). Which counters the entire argument that men can't do anything for women. If they didn't, then women would still have literally nothing since it's still mostl…
/r/MensRights02/07/18 06:57 AM
1

feminism =/= women
/r/MensRights02/07/18 06:53 AM
3

Most people buying games from Activision, Ubisoft, EA, etc are mainstream audiences who don't really care about the state of the industry. They just play the popular games and then wait for the next one. Rinse repeat. They just want some fun. They don't care that EA ruined PopCap, Bioware, Star Wars games, is a greedy mother fucker, that Activision is a greedy mother fucker, that Ubisoft is a greedy mother fucker. They just want to play CoD, AC, Madden and whatever and that's it.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 10:10 AM
4

Often worse when it's teachers. "affair", "sex romp", "relationship". People like to drone on about rape culture and how we supposedly "normalize" the rape of women. I just don't see how they can believe that, when rape like this is reported in such a manner. Yet the reverse almost never happens (certainly not from big publications). Rape is rape is rape. I don't get why we can't make the laws neutral. I mean technically they "are" neutral, in the way that "well gay people can get married! to th…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 09:58 AM
1

Then it's legally rape. It's about the penetration in a sexual manner most places. Taking liberties in the wording. Most women don't use objects to penetrate men when they rape them though, so that leaves men out. Which is disgusting. Since to any rational human being, it is very much rape to force someone to have sex against their will. The "how" is irrelevant. Even some studies that feminists use about rape statistics include the "forced to penetrate" (rape) numbers and that evens out the numb…
/r/MensRights29/06/18 09:52 AM
2

Yeah I don't like RT either, or reviews in general. But in this context, it makes sense to reference it. Since that's what they're complaining about essentially
/r/MensRights23/06/18 04:46 AM
1

And some people (everyone) don't like the specific image of a MOTHER and CHILD being torn apart. Which is why they used "mother" and not "family". Mother is not some "fill in" word that has no meaning. This has nothing to do with feminism. The world exists outside your black and white ignorance.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 04:44 AM
1

The emphasis is on the kids being taken, Not it isn't. The emphasis is on the kids being taken FROM THEIR MOTHERS. Which is why they said MOTHERS. Because the mental image of a child ripped away from their mother is far more evocative than a child ripped away from a father, or genderless "family". A mother! Oh the horror! The special maternal bond! No one loves like a mother! faints
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:51 PM
1

Not really since I was skimming through. Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:48 PM
1

Nope. That is demonstrably so. Best argument ever.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:47 PM
2

"Context matters!" - he says ignoring context of why people post the quote.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:45 PM
1

I don't care if it's the "military". Nobody else cares either. That's what you aren't grasping. Being "the military" doesn't mean you're above criticism. Get a grip. Frankly that's all the more reason for consistent, clearly defined rules. Not "eh whenever I feel like it you can do it". The military isn’t a committee. The person in charge has the authority to say you will do it this way and as long as it’s not violating the regulations, Gee, wonder where those regulations came from.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 11:45 AM
1

It shouldn't be at the discretion of one person. Either it's bad or not. Pick one and roll with it. Not "eh, I don't feel like letting you wear shorts today. Wearing shorts is fine. Just not today."
/r/MensRights22/06/18 11:31 AM
1

This isn't a "rape joke". It's making fun of a rape victim and the circumstances of their rape. Very. VERY different. This isn't a made up scenario from a comedy special. It's a story of something that actually occurred. The man was a victim of rape, and they are joking about that and making light of his victimization. That is not "a rape joke".
/r/MensRights22/06/18 10:14 AM
1

The headmaster allows shorts... but only when he gives "permission". That's a dumb ass rule. Why should their ability to wear shorts be contingent on the headmaster feeling like it? It's okay with it, but only when he feels like it? Who cares what he feels like, the boys are the ones who are in the hot weather. Let them wear shorts whenever they choose to do so. And let them wear skirts if they want, who cares. Most aren't going to do so. Only reason this boy did is to try and get around the hea…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 10:12 AM
1

Headmaster Owain Jones confirmed pupils are only allowed to wear shorts with his say-so - but he hadn't granted the short OK this summer. What a stupid policy. This is even dumber than outright not allowing shorts. You can only wear shorts if the Headmaster feels like allowing it? I agree with the couple comments in the article saying he's power tripping.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 10:06 AM
1

It isn't a contest.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 10:00 AM
1

How is that at all comparable? "Mothers" is never used to mean "parents" or to be gender neutral. Whereas "guys" is used as a gender neutral word all the time. What a ridiculous comparison.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:58 AM
7

Thing is it hasn't even reviewed that badly. Somehow less than Ghostbusters 2016, but that was overscored by about... whatever its current score is. That was a dumpster fire, yet reviewed I believe in they 70s on RT. While this last I looked was the high 60s. Which isn't that bad. Not great, sure. But not worth some conspiracy. Bridesmaids reviewed fine and it was successful too... I bet most of the reviewers for that were dudes. I wonder what the differences are...
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:41 AM
1

I mean it makes sense for shows like this, it's all about drama and bullshit. It's the perfect invention for this.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:33 AM
3

The internet does.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:30 AM
11

Given quotes from "Unknown" get passed around... I think you're overestimating how many truly care the "source" of a quote. Hell some of my favorite quotes I can't be arsed to remember the source of. Since it's irrelevant. Why does who says something make it more or less valid? You can still hate the person saying it, but agree with this one specific thing. If that person you hate said the Earth is round, do you become a flat Earther? Do you start denying facts to avoid agreeing with evil people…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:27 AM
11

Fascinating stuff. Obviously if that were common knowledge, people would dissociate themselves from that quote. Hitler supported animal rights, should we oppose animal rights to distance ourselves from Hitler? Or should things not be so black and white? The quote could come from Honey Boo Boo, and it would hold the same meaning.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 09:21 AM
2

No amount of genital mutilation is going to "end aids". They're stupid. Africa needs access to proper sex education and access to condoms. Giving them some false "prevention" tool like genital mutilation is just going to make them think it's safe to have unprotected sex. Which will just spread aids easier. Even Americans act like MGM somehow is going to "help" issues like this and we have better access to information on the subject. People are stupid.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:28 PM
2

Daily Mail is really shit about that. They repeat information so much that it starts to get confusing. It borders on unreadable for me. Especially since it's split into so many one or two sentence paragraphs. I remember one article where they stated that they were withholding a person's identity within the content of the article. But in one of the picture's little tagline things they actually wrote the person's name that they said they were withholding. :/ How can you be so inept? They're one of…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:11 AM
2

So don't mention Father's Day. "Love you mom!" Or say something like "To all the fathers out there who stuck around, good for you." Or something. Not "HAPPY FATHER'S DAY MOM." She's got a day already. Being a single mother doesn't make you a father. You're still a mother, and there's a day for that already. If he wants to call up his mother and personally wish her a happy father's day, that's fine to me. But he made it a public statement which is absurd. People always do this shit on Father's Da…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 09:03 AM
5

I don't see a problem with giving praise to single mothers, You should not use Father's Day as your opportunity to praise single mothers. At least, not as a "statement". On a personal level, do what you want. Mothers have a day already. One that gets far more media coverage as it is. Oh what's it called... oh, right. Mother's Day. You don't need to co-opt Father's Day and make it about mothers.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:58 AM
1

"gender equality AND woman's rights" Clearly it's not about gender equality when you single out women's rights as a separate thing worth mentioning on it's own. Given how things for "gender equality" usually go [He For She], this is actually saying "women's rights and women's rights". So why pretend? At least be honest that it's just about women. I mean, that's pretty obvious to anyone with a semblance of rationality. "UN Women" after all.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:33 AM
3

I think a sizeable amount of men like your father would opt out of parenthood if there were legal and social support in men doing so. Right now, men are just expected to go with whatever decision a woman makes so feel they have no real right to say no to parenthood. And some women don't even take a no for an answer. "Oops, I forgot to take my birth control". In that instance, he changed his mind on having two kids after having one. I'm not saying your dad isn't a scumbag, I don't know him from a…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:22 AM
1

"Yes, and she had the chance when she chose to let a penis not using protection inside her vagina, or not to get her tubes tide and have sex with a man. What do you think would happen?" See how you sound now?
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:11 AM
6

Except the legal servitude for 18 years. Women also have far more ways to prevent a pregnancy from ever happening. The only ways that men have, are also available to women. [condoms/abstinence]
/r/MensRights18/06/18 08:06 AM
3

Not necessarily. If the woman is on notice that the father has absolved himself of all parental and monetary responsibility, then she will be made aware that if she goes through with the pregnancy... she's doing so alone. So she can make an informed decision on if she is ready to take on such a task alone or not. And I'd imagine plenty would make the pragmatic decision to get an abortion. So there would not be a baby born out of it. Right now, men have no choice. So men who do not want kids are …
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:58 AM
5

The father is whoever is on the birth certificate. There's then a timeframe to contest this, I believe you're meant to be served papers about when to contest paternity. But if you do not, good luck getting out of paying for that kid. Even with DNA evidence that it's not yours. There was a man in prison that was going to be forced to pay child support for a child that was not his, by the own admission of the woman who put his name down. And through DNA evidence. And the real father was living wit…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:42 AM
2

I think the issue with the male decision here is that it doesnt resolve the real "problem," that being there is still a child If the man is able to legally absolve himself, then the woman is on notice that she's going to be doing it alone. There's no more men feeling social pressure to say "Yeah... that's great" and then when the baby comes go "Actually fuck this." and leaves. Those men would rarely ever agree to have a child. But they aren't allowed to absolve themselves. So women end up stuck …
/r/MensRights18/06/18 07:32 AM
4

This is about self preservation. Nobody should be asked to put themselves into as situation that could risk their own life. You don't know what the guy will do if you step in to help. Even in an instance of public domestic violence, both of the parties could turn on you if you try to help one or the other. You don't know what people are capable of. It's best to remove yourself. At most call the police as you do so. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions". Saying "leave her alone" to hel…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:39 PM
1

You flipped out for no reason.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:28 PM
2

And a lot of boys are also not being educated in such places. Which they aren't talking about at all. And of the two genders,which one in these places is going to be expected to support the family they eventually build? Assuming they live long enough to have one.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:26 PM
1

The problem there is responsibility that girls/women do not have. Boys/men are expected to go to school, get a job, and care for the women in their families. Women have no such responsibility so their education is unimportant. Without changing the social expectation and responsibilities people expect... what good is it really going to do anybody? It's going to make more problems. They need to start elsewhere first. edit; also, there are many boys who are not getting educations around the world t…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:24 PM
2

It's also the most valuable piece.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:14 PM
2

Because those men are already treated how they should be. As criminals.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:10 PM
1

The first reply, just replace "man" with "black man" and see how it sounds. Wooo, racist as fuck. Fails the test. They all do though.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:08 PM
2

They are wrong, and no Return of the Kings do not call "themselves" MRAs. Look up "Men's Rights" on their site. "5 Reasons I'm Not a Men's Rights Activist" The Men's Rights Movement is no place for men Yeah, sure sounds like a place that calls themselves MRAs... oh wait. The only people that call them that are feminists who just lump all groups of men into "MRA" to smear them. Stop buying into feminist lies. You should know better. They used to also explain this in their "about" section that the…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:52 PM
3

That was worse, since he was bullied in school over it. This is just social media which you can push a button and make go away. Which she did by deleting her account, with no mention of why she did. From what I read she never even had a twitter, and didn't like social media to begin with? Plus, I've yet to see evidence that she deleted her account for this reason. I don't doubt she got shit on pretty hard, but it sure isn't because she's a woman or minority. But I haven't seen them touting o out…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:44 PM
0

If you've ever done anal, I suggest finding cleaner partners because you can have anal without the smell of feces my dude.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:40 PM
1

I read this as "White Gays" for some reason. lol Though I guess it applies since we're white guys too. Check your privilege Melinda.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:39 PM
5

If you were left intact, you'd also want to be no other way. Women in the third world are happy with their FGM, and will force it on their daughters too. Are they right? Is it not mutilation since they like it and are very happy with it? It's not okay to stab a baby to a table, and tear it's foreskin from the head of the penis, and cut it off. Boys go into so much shock that they pass out. I suggest you actually watch one. Hell don't even watch it. Simply listen to it. And come back to me and te…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 11:14 AM
3

If female circumcision No. It's because it is mutilation for boys. That's it. It has nothing at all to do with FGM. By definition it is mutilation.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 11:07 AM
0

Because gynocentrism also exists in India? Do more research. You can just listen to this for a start. tight spaces like trains Trains shouldn't be "tight spaces". Stop normalizing overpopulation and countries' inability to accommodate it's people. This isn't exclusive to India either.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:59 AM
1

There are Jews against circumcision. Not sure how many, but they exist.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:49 AM
2

Don't read the comments unless you want to read a bunch of apologia.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:45 AM
2

Plenty of places all over already do have them. So it probably will make a difference in his own area.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:39 AM
12

His argument is basically the anti-gay marriage argument of "It's not discrimination! Gay people can marry the same sex too!" Which is missing the point of the issue completely. There's already a gender neutral clothing option; shorts. And they've banned it for no apparently reason. I can't see skirts and shorts as so vastly different that one would be banned, but not the other. I would love to know the reasoning behind why there's a distinction. Head Moira Green said: “Chiltern Edge, with the s…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:32 AM
11

Except it's common for girls and women to wear shorts. It is not equally common for boys or men to wear skirts. It's not even common in it's own right. Which is why I bet if you walked into any clothing store you'd not find a single skirt in the boy/men's sections. But you'd find shorts in the girl/women's sections. Why wouldn't they allow shorts if they allow skirts? It doesn't even make sense on a logical level.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:29 AM
12

Most jobs won't allow a man to wear skirts either. What's your point exactly?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:19 AM
3

Demi's twitter feed shows otherwise with more likes going to people not okay with this or the people defending her or downplaying it.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:16 AM
3

Demi and Max [the guy she "pranked"] have publicly responded to it, so it's not fake. I don't know if there's a proper archive of it. Here's her addressing it archieved though. "I swear I could tweet something about craving jelly beans and it would offend someone." "For all of those coming at me rn, listen to the lyrics of Warrior and maybe you’ll have more compassion for someone who made a simple mistake. Of all people I know about sexual abuse. You don’t have to educate me." "So sorry if anyon…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:12 AM
1

I liked her music, but I don't know anymore. After this and that god awful trash she did with Christina Aguilera (especially the video), I don't know. Worst part about that video w/ Christina is the juxtaposition against Christina's last video. Girl please.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:09 AM
2

In case she deletes any of the next ones, I'll link to archives of them. You can get the normal link up top if you want to see it there. "I swear I could tweet something about craving jelly beans and it would offend someone." "For all of those coming at me rn, listen to the lyrics of Warrior and maybe you’ll have more compassion for someone who made a simple mistake. Of all people I know about sexual abuse. You don’t have to educate me." "So sorry if anyone was offended sadface" "That’s just the…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 07:53 AM
1

Perhaps her abusers were abused in their childhood or life. Is what they did okay now, Demi? No. Same here. Being a victim doesn't let you victimize others. It doesn't absolve you of anything.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 07:35 AM
2

Eh, plenty calling her out and having none of the defenders bullshit too. It's actually refreshing. did you think this wasn’t offensive? lmaoooo you’re a joke insert screenshot of the tweet 1.1k favorites Defender saying "it was a joke" gets 75 faves, and the response to that b/s sexual assault is no joke 1.1k favorites Another example "You did nothing wrong" 185 favorites. Compared to "Yes she did? screenshot of tweet here" 783 favorites. I don't think you understand how men are conditioned to …
/r/MensRights04/06/18 07:32 AM
2

Would he even feel like he could feel another way about it? It's not like anybody cares. Demi's career is going to be completely unaffected just like other women who have been involved in sexually assaulting men. Even more directly. Or outright rape like that one comedian that I don't want to spread the name of. Take issue, you're gay or overreacting, or lucky. If we took it more seriously, then I'd be more comfortable leaving things up to each individual's feelings about it. But we don't, so it…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 07:28 AM
3

Ironic given that her song with Christina Aguilera and how the video is done. And she's playing victim now too. I swear I could tweet something about craving jelly beans and it would offend someone Yeah, because gleeful reminiscence of having someone sexually assault another person on your behalf for the lulz is comparable to talking about jelly beans. Get the fuck outta here. I'm happy to see so many people calling her out and pushing against this shit. And even happier to see how many favorite…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 07:24 AM
1

anyone* withavagina
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:22 PM
4

Someone did scribble on it "It happens to men also".
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:22 PM
15

Implying you can't consent when drinking, which you can. Which is why you should drink responsibly. You consent to driving a car and then if you crash it into a blind orphan choir, you're accountable. Because you chose to drink to the point where you lose your faculties. And then during that time, chose to drive. Which resulted in the death of innocent people. Tired of this nonsense. Nevermind that drunk women are probably having sex with drunk men. So if we apply the logic equally, they're rapi…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:56 PM
1

Those are longer than what some of the girls in my class wore. Which was what I'm talking about. Basically short shorts but that 'gym short' material, whatever it is. To me that length is fine. Hell, looks like the length boy shorts used to be back in the day. Might be a bit longer actually. Times sure change.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:19 AM
3

More recently Steve Harvey's show had a woman on peddling this stuff and mentioned Oprah. He was horrified when he found out it had foreskin cells in it, then she clarified it was just baby foreskin. And he was relieved. Oh so funny. Wholesome entertainment. /s
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:16 AM
1

that doesn’t mean she’s some dumb whore that can’t do anything but have sex. Nobody said that? Though it does show she's stupid if she dresses that way and then complains about the foreseeable reactions she gets from males and females. The latter which gets ignored to blame men for everything. If I wear a speedo I'll get more attention as a man than if I'm wearing swim trunks. So I choose to not wear a speedo. I don't want that attention. If I did choose to wear a speedo, I'm not going to demand…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:07 AM
1

Boys generally have harsher dress codes to adhere to than girls do!
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:04 AM
1

You mean the shorts that are short and barely cover anything? If a male without underwear in the same thing would have his cock/balls hanging out, it's inappropriate attire in my mind.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:02 AM
1

Also, slut shaming exists for a reason. No man More women slut shame than men. Men don't care if a woman is a slut, generally. That just means easier access to sex. The "problem" is that when these men don't want to marry her or date her because she's slutty that is deemed "slut shaming". It's just a consequence of your poor decisions. And women have been conditioned to react to consequences they dislike with victimhood and act as though it's oppression. As if men never face consequences for the…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:00 AM
3

Think he means more a muscle shirt. If he did, in middle school a boy in my class was sent home for that reason too. Only it was more a hygiene thing. Ah puberty. Talk about embarrassing somebody.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:56 AM
3

its not clear that according to her its the boys who are to blame. Are you blind? it's pretty obvious the person who made this is blaming boys, badly with the intro but they still make it clear it's boys' fault. "teach boys that girls are NOT sexual objects."
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:51 AM
1

It's not like boys have a dress code to follow. If I went to school with a miniskirt they would've been fine for sure. Oh wait. I remember a boy sent home to change for wearing a muscle shirt. STOP SLUT SHAMING BOYS!111! /s He broke the dress code. Whether you like the rules or not is another subject, but we all had/have them so deal with it. Girls already have way more freedom to dress how they want. So when they finally hit a rule that affects them feel oppressed. Gee, it's almost like having …
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:47 AM
13

There are people that actually believe if you find a period gross you're misogynist though. So I don't see how this is beyond that scope. "It's natural" and "beautiful". The same courtesy not extended to diarrhea I'm sure. That's why we find ourselves in a world where insane people paint with their period blood.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:38 AM
2

I never said anything of the sort. Get real. There are plenty of reasons for men to hold their feelings in. Like a man raped by another man. In certain cultures if he were to tell his wife, she would leave him and take the children. Since if he can't even protect himself, then how will he protect her and the children? That is a reason to hold his feelings in. To keep his family intact. Being violated on top of losing everything? How is that helpful to a man? It isn't, it'll destroy him further. …
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:30 PM
7

There's plenty of reasons, don't be naive.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:02 AM
2

I've never heard of this 'star'. That guy from Glee or whatever who killed himself was talked about a lot. I think if this was Brad Pitt's kid or something, then people would talk about it more.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:50 AM
2

This goes along with the whole “you have a lifted truck? Or a fast car? Must be compensating for something.” Like it’s frowned upon to be “manly” in today’s society That's hardly new. That's been around all my life. So 3 decades give or take.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:46 AM
1

I'm winning being gay~ :p
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:45 AM
1

If they did so because you told them to, then they wouldn't be going their own way. Let men do what they want.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:44 AM
1

As my fiance says, "Being louder doesn't make you righter".
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:43 AM
2

I could just see a woman being angry at her boyfriend/husband, and during a fight be like "Why don't you go listen to a breakup song from Taylor Swift you faggot little bitch". Information to some women is just a weapon to use later.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:42 AM
4

I have a beard because I'm lazy, thank you very much!
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:36 AM
2

My sister always had more male friends than female, for this reason. She doesn't "brag" about it though, it just was that way. She does have some female friends now that she has kids though, they're mostly neighbors with kids themselves.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 09:34 AM
1

It's become somewhat tradition for fans And it's far more common "tradition" for women to abuse men openly and freely with no consequence. What's your point? That something is okay as long as we do it enough? Please. My argument is that America is becoming more and more sensitive in all aspects of life This isn't about "all aspects of life". This is about grabbing a stranger's ass, or otherwise sexually assaulting them. Get outta here with this bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:59 PM
1

Well that would certainly not help his case for straightness, sans a DNA test.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 11:10 AM
53

And people need to understand that in some relationships, the rules are set by the people actually in the relationship. Rather than strangers on the internet. My fiance knows he can wake me up with his dick if he wants to. I asked him to do it on my birthday one year, and he did. It wasn't rape, it's something we agree to in our relationship. If you do set up this kind of standard, and you later decide you dislike the arrangement. You have to actually have the conversation about it so the other …
/r/MensRights12/05/18 11:05 AM
1

Not when they're strangers. With friends, sure there's nuance. But just walking up to some stranger, grabbing their ass, and going "it's just a prank, bro" doesn't fly. Period.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:31 AM
0

A quote irrelevant to this subject matter.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:10 PM
2

I personally need more than 'feeling' to say that race was a factor, but you're entitled to your opinion.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:07 PM
6

Not everybody likes or wants hook ups. I don't, am also gay. I'm a would be serial monogamist. I say would be since I'm still in my first monogamist relationship, but I'd never want to 'date' around or 'hook up'. Not for me.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:29 PM
12

Men pay more taxes as it is.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:25 PM
2

Punish liars while actually requiring proper evidence to put someone away for rape. Simple.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:22 PM
13

So you think the judge would've ruled differently if the men were white? Based on what exactly? Plenty of men, of a variety of races, have had this same issue.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:17 PM
7

Except he'll have to plow away to feel a fraction of what other men would have to with a natural penis. Plus more friction, plus no male addition to natural lubrication, plus it'll be dried out... I'd rather have short sex that's good than long sex that's bad.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:55 AM
3

So, sure, pointing out that the only reason the term "uncircumcised" exists is solely because of the prevalence of circumcision is quite poignant. The same applies to "intact". Remove circumcision from the universe. Then we just have a penis. There'd be no need to refer to it as "intact" since no shit, it's the penis as it was meant to be. It's a bit redundant. Arguing semantics like this is a huge waste of time. If someone conveys the point, leave it alone. Use the words you want, don't demand …
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:52 AM
1

what kind of world do we want to live in? One where we don't casually allow people to sexually assault people and pass it off as "goofin". Regardless of genders involved. You may want to live in a world where this is "having a laugh", but I don't. Keep your hands to yourself.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:43 AM
2

As the man could overpower them and actually do something harmful. And then be arrested, and accused by your female assaulter that you sexually assaulted her. And have her be believed over you. Men just can't do anything about it. Women can lay out a false accusation on embarrassment alone. So even just saying something won't necessarily work out for you.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:38 AM
1

No woman is harassed "all the fucking time". Even if it's "common" for an individual that is not "all the fucking time". And we shouldn't lose the perspective of all the hundreds, if not thousands, of people who don't interact with you at all. And those who interact with you normally. All we talk about is street harassers, nobody talks about the sea of people minding their own business who are actually there all the fucking time. Nobody wants to acknowledge them, since we'd rather pretend that i…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:35 AM
2

As far as I'm aware they're two separate entities.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:30 AM
1

It was one of them, can't remember if was Venus or Serena.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:19 AM
1

Most women aren't feminists and will trash other women. What's your point?
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:18 AM
0

How does it not hurt women as well? When's the last time feminism talked about female rapists at all? Not doing so, just increases the chance of further rapes in the future from the their victims. Females rape other females. When's the last time feminism addressed lesbian domestic violence? When's the last time feminism addressed female on male abuse? If a woman is constantly beating her boyfriend, that's only going to increase the likelihood that he'll eventually defend himself when he reaches …
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:17 AM
1

Breathing oxygen is a sign of white supremacy. edit; just in case obvious /s
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:11 AM
2

Who would think that you could become one of the best of anything in the world without making some sacrifices? People who have never achieved anything and/or lack common sense.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:04 AM
2

Ah insults. Bye bye.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 01:38 PM
1

Gender when I was growing up was interchangeable with "sex". Probably so they could avoid using "sex" on forms for kids. I think most still use it that way too.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:15 AM
2

One is a widespread societal problem How is that a "widespread societal problem?" There are hundreds of millions of people in the US. 700k of that is a pretty small percentage. And that's not to mention whether your claim of 700k is true or not. And, based on what I'm finding there were an estimated 3.7 million burglaries in the US a year. And 1 million of them had someone present at the time. So just that alone is higher than your rape stats. So is burglary a widespread societal problem too? Or…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:12 AM
1

In many places yes that is the legal definition of rape, sadly. "forced sexual intercourse" how hard is that? That's what rape is to any sane person.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:54 AM
8

The case I find compelling is that parents should be awarded custody according to how much work each one puts into the child already rather than to assume 50/50. I have zero investment in which parent that is. Ignoring the projection. It's just a huge coincidence that the parent more often to do that is a woman. So either the kid winds up with the poorer parent who has time for them or the richer parent who doesn't? Okay. Hey, I'm not the one against shared custody, you are. If you don't want it…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:47 AM
3

Stupid since that's not how our language currently has been set up. Language doesn't change on a dime. It evolves over time.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:33 AM
4

Feminism claims to be about gender equality, nothing stated in this video is out of the scope of gender equality. It's totally relevant.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:27 AM
1

Most of them didn't even do anything, even the one that seemed to reject it the most was still pretty tame.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:26 AM
1

I think his point was more about not at least checking the youtube description. Usually people post sources there. Not everyone does, but it's worth the like 2 seconds it takes to check it out. I wouldn't personally expect someone to google everything themselves, but in the context of a youtube vid at least peruse the description for them first.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:22 AM
1

Helps that the facts tend to resonate with people's experiences. When I see a homeless person, it's most often a man. This is probably true for most people. When I think of unprovoked domestic violence, I think of seeing women slapping their boyfriends around in public. I think that stat would have people think of these instances. It helps people realize what they've been seeing around them better. I believe most people want equality of opportunity, they aren't getting sold proper information to…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:17 AM
2

"for whatever reason". Don't forget the weasel words. Yeah, "for whatever reason", I believe that you could earn less than a man. Those reasons can be perfectly valid and have nothing to do with your gender. Hence the entire point of why the "wage" gap is an earnings gap and why it doesn't matter at all.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:13 AM
2

I'm simply over analyzing language how feminists do when they claim terms like "fireman" are sexist.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:02 AM
13

It's not an ad hominem, it's true. You're a peon to the leaders of feminism pushing for inequality. This is as clear as day, that's why they train you in university when you're still lacking in life experience to understand anything and easily swayed with "well meaning" bullshit. And that's why they want to shove the propaganda down younger and younger, so it's easier and easier to brainwash new generations into their dogmatic thinking. How convenient for you that you happen to disagree with sha…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 07:57 AM
4

Because men have no identity beyond the average human. Women do. Man used to refer to any adult. We had "werman" and "wifman" for men and women respectfully. We replaced wifman, with woman and just erased werman's identity and lumped them into the catch all word for all people. Using "mankind" isn't preferential to men. You "guys" isn't preferential to men either. How is erasing men's identity preferential? If these terms mean everyone, then that means men are left with what? And girl used to be…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 07:44 AM
7

I wouldn't if feminism was the same as it is now. It's not the name I, and most others, take issue with.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 07:32 AM
18

Tell that to the National Organization for Women next time they oppose default shared parenting. And tell that to feminists in the education system pushing double standards as the standard by attempting to redefine sexism as "power + privilege" so they can openly be sexist toward men. I could go on, but people like yourself rarely see reason and just want to believe feminism is some holy movement with zero issues in it. You're a peon to the powers that be, and the powers that be are very much ag…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 07:30 AM
2

Thanks, saved me a response. lol
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:55 PM
51

That's vile. Sorry she reacted that way. If I were you, I'd dump her, no amount of good would counterbalance out that level of callousness. But that's me.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:38 AM
8

That's vague though. Do the people who act the way I mention think it's adding to "shame"? How can you even add to shame if you don't buy into a boy/man feeling it to begin with? We need to be specific about what people do and say to boys and men who are raped. Especially when raped by women.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:35 AM
2

Learn to comprehend what you read, thanks. I'll highlight the portion that makes your reply redundant. I feel like that may be an unfair assumption. I got that impression, but looking at their site I now think otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:31 AM
16

That was my impression as well. Though looking through their website, I feel like that may be an unfair assumption. Still, it'd be a better poster if it did have those things I wrote on there. Because, those are far more likely to happen to boys and men when a female rapes you.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:33 AM
9

The emails were a huge "nope" for a lot of people. People already thought she was untrustworthy, then boom. And then she had the gall to lean into the "listen and believe" shit too. With her history with alleged rape victims. Ha. What a stupid move, and she wonders why people look at her and think she has no soul. I remember her whining about college and how a man told her she didn't belong there, and that they deserved a spot there. Never did it occur to her, that they didn't hate women, but th…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:23 AM
1

die in their sleep. You hope they have the best possible natural death? Weird thing to say. I think most people hope of dying in their sleep instead of some awful way.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:16 AM
1

It would probably only come into effect when he turns 18 years old. There was another boy raped by an adult woman [teacher iirc] and she got pregnant, and he had to pay child support + back support when he turned 18 years old.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:16 AM
2

Men have been charged with 'rape by deception' before for poking holes in condoms, I fail to see why this isn't a similar offense. As well as lying about birth control.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:14 AM
3

If you volunteer to quit your current job and work in sewage then sure. You can deal with all the flushed condoms, tampons, and needles. And you have to do it all around the country. It's all on you personally. Otherwise, nope. Not about to recommend fucking over other men who have to clean up your mess like that.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:11 AM
1

Freeze it and have a nice Popsicle.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:10 AM
4

A man that was in prison when he was supposedly "served" the papers to contest paternity was still forced to pay child support when he got out of prison. Despite them knowing full well that he wasn't the father through DNA testing, and that there was no record in the prison of him receiving the notice. It doesn't matter, men are fucked over despite common sense and evidence all the time. This was years ago I know he was trying to fight it, not sure what happened afterwards. But he should've neve…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:09 AM
2

From extreme cases like this to ladies who will fish a condom out of the trash. Or from their mouth. "It was a gift". Stupid funding judge. If I gift someone a car, I don't have to pay for gas, insurance, maintenance, etc. One of the dumbest decisions ever made. He specifically didn't take the risk of vaginal sex, in yet still got stuck with a bill to pay for a child. Since she chose to go take it from her mouth and put it up her vagina like a crazy person who should never be allowed to have acc…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:06 AM
10

Because he suffers from cognitive dissonance. This isn't about "views". It's about forcing cosmetic surgery on a male baby's genitalia since you a separate adult prefer it that way. Or forcing it on your baby's genitals because your own personal religion. Or forcing it on your own baby because you deem lies about sex related "benefits" are true; babies don't have to worry about sex so why make this decision for them? Ah right, because otherwise they would never do it like the vast majority of ad…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 05:01 AM
10

Imposing ones views on others is boorish. lmao. That's exactly what you're supporting. Parents enforcing their own views on their defenseless child's body. It's permanent cosmetic surgery. Even if we agree for the sake of argument about all that bullshit you list off that parents are "allowed" to do, two wrongs don't make a right. So it's a shitty argument. Just so happens that your entire argument is nonsense so it's irrelevant anyway. A health related and aesthetic minor modification is well w…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:57 AM
688

... give me a high five? ... tell me I'm lucky?
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:49 AM
10

Alright, I'll commit. After a night of family drama, how bad can it be? Why? I don't do this before explaining something to a man, so if I did this for women it would be sexist. Never, ever, try to explain masculinity, maleness, MGM, 'man'-ing to a man! Or, everyone is open to every topic and anyone that says otherwise is stupid. Trans women are trans women. Which is why you said "Trans women" specifically in the first place. Repeat it to yourself, since apparently even you don't get what you're…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:37 AM
66

learn some basic Gender Studies 101 No thanks. I don't join cults.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 07:59 AM
3

I've seen ads for it in the Futurama mobile game when getting free pizza for watching them. I cringe every time. Looks like utter shit. I see it on the YouTube app too. If it lets me, I downvote the ad.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:37 PM
8

Child labor ain't cheap! Wait...
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:30 PM
2

Mods will never do anything to improve the shit that this sub has turned into. So take it or leave it, this is what it will always be. They'll just let people swarm in from r/all and then shit all over everybody here and downvote us. And they'll let shitty posts remain that don't belong here because they're against "censorship". Because trying to stay on topic is censorship apparently.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:24 PM
4

You mean this upvoted comment isn't from a r/mensrights regular? Why I'm shocked! Men's rights idiots don't know the difference between that and actual news because they've been conditioned by youtube.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:21 PM
3

Men deal with their nature alone, and apart. And what are they attempting to imply by that, I wonder?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:20 PM
6

So if a white nationalist wrote an op-ed they'd publish it? Doubtful.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:15 PM
6

I bet there's a lot of opinion pieces they deny to publish as well. Curating content, means you're approving of what you become associated with.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:13 PM
49

Exactly. It's about rough and tumble play/play fighting and being just energetic in general. But instead of allowing that to remain true, we just drug them up. And try to act like saying that means "yeah, boys will rape girls. It's totally normal and harmless gaiz!" No one says that.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 11:11 PM
1

No amount of talking is going to fix issues. You can talk until you're blue in the face, but if the reasons you're depressed are still right in front of you... you're not going to feel any better. You can't solve a problem by talking about it. The problem is still there. Not everyone is going to just accept things suck ass and get over it. Some will just feel worse and hopeless and kill themselves. Since they need a solution to the PROBLEM. And talking is not a solution to the problem.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:48 PM
1

It's called an example. edit; The fact I have to point this out is sad.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 12:25 PM
4

It is mutilation by definition. What an adult does to their genitals is their own business. Babies however, need protection from genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:59 AM
1

Does any long term relationship maintain a sex life as it does early on?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:57 AM
1

She also bribed her sister with candy to lay on top of her and to kiss her. She described her own behavior toward her sister as "predatory", and she wasn't wrong. In yet feminists defended her, and still don't damn her. Luckily, every time her vile name is brought up people talk about it and more and more people learn that she's a horrible disgusting human being.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:56 AM
2

I would never go to my "apparent superior's" hotel room. I would also never agree to let my "apparent superior" masturbate in front of me, whether I thought they were joking or not. In fact, if they made that kind of "joke" I'd be actually offended and report him [or her] immediately. But I would never be in their hotel room at all, so a situation like this would never happen in the first place. Yes his actions were 'inappropriate', but so were their own.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:52 AM
1

I had to take many breaks to the comment section to get through this video. Someone used a common phrase to describe her in the comments. "The lights are on, but nobody's home", that's about as accurate as you can get.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:39 AM
3

Against arguments/facts/data brought up by MRAs, I would assume. Didn't watch the video though so can't say for sure, but from the context provided in the parent comment that's what it seems like.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:35 AM
3

That's why "international heh, intersectional feminism" exists, it's basically a structure built on victim points. The more points you have, the higher on the victim ladder you are. Regular feminism wasn't factoring in these extra points of victimhood, so gotta have a better version that does.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:34 AM
8

That kind of thing is why I support doctor assisted suicide. Quality of life matters.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:23 AM
5

Plus there's the things they can say behind closed doors. "If you leave, I'll do x, y, z." For men that could amount to "If you try to leave, I'll say you abused me and molested our kids."
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:22 AM
5

You mean this? According to the L.A. County District Attorney’s Office, 44-year-old Gonzales has two bench warrants out for his arrest after not showing up to court for petty theft and driving without a valid license. That sounds unrelated to the dine and dashes. This guy sounds like a pretty shitty person. Police also say he committed a snip and ditch when security video caught him leaving a Burbank hair salon with his smock on after getting a cut and color last year.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:18 AM
1

For some, in some contexts. "Talking" isn't going to allow a father to see his children. For a father to stop his ex-wife from telling his children that he doesn't love them, that he's a bad person, so they don't want to see him. It's not going to stop the courts from being against him. It's not going to do anything. It's just going to be talking. Men need real solutions to their problems. Talking is not one of them.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 08:14 AM
5

Why do people never give actual examples of the "homophobic" things? I'd like to decide for myself if they're actually homophobic, not just take their word for it. Why do I have to dig to find it? Anyone got a link to quotes? I didn't see any in this article.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:56 AM
3

I think this is a result of people reporting you. I got met with the same problem after I was arguing with people about something political, probably about men's rights. I'm male. I think it's also just a way to try and farm more data from users.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:27 AM
3

because they can't conceive of any other situation. It's more that they want to ensure their future. Meaning, that feminism has a future. So they don't want to solve anything, they just want funding. So they try to frame everything as an issue for women, even stupid shit. Doesn't matter as long as feminism gets to continue it's fight against it.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:22 AM
3

I've always hated the US party system, or any really. People don't agree on every issue, despite being in the same "party" so why are we grouping up exactly? I'll remain independent thanks.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:17 AM
3

Gay male, I talk to my sister about some of the SJW craziness in the world. But not a whole lot specifically, and she's pretty against a lot of it. I don't really talk about it to that many people in real life, since I don't really talk to that many people in the first place. Online it's a mixed bag. In places not dedicated to this kind of thing, like here, I generally get positive responses when I say things outside the general "LGBTlaundrylist community" guidelines. ie; feminism. Like on gamin…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 08:03 AM
1

Which is stupid as girls will comment more often about how their female peers are dressed than boys. Boys will just be distracted, but girls will tear each other apart.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 06:16 AM
1

You can remember it by ends with -ence. How on earth is this supposed to be useful to remember something. Bad bot.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 06:14 AM
2

The real issue is over population and not enough space for them to have room on public transit to still have personal space. Cram tons of people into a box and people are going to bumping into each other all the time. Some of which will be misconstrued as "groping" later on in stories. Inflating the "issue" an unknowable amount. But it's easier to just throw men in jail than to actually provide the proper amount of space for the population.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 06:11 AM
1

and lasted less than a second. But the scars last a lifetime! /s
/r/MensRights27/04/18 06:08 AM
3

Good grief. Being uncomfortable is not that big of a deal. I have really bad social anxiety so I'm uncomfortable if someone exists around me in public, let alone says something to me. Regardless of what it is. But, it's just a feeling that goes away. It's not the end of the world. Life continues to move forward, the world continues to spin around on it's axis. People are weak as hell these days. "I felt... uncomfortable/disgusted... I'm going to hold onto this memory for the rest of my life!" Ye…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:19 AM
3

It's bad for everyone. Bad for women, since they then can't make an informed decision on whether to keep the baby, carry to term, etc. Since a man is forced to pay regardless, but he may take measures to avoid it. Bad for men because it's forcing them to be parents before they are prepared for it. And because family courts are so stacked against them and child support is incredibly abusive. Bad for children because men who never wanted the kid are either there, and showing their resentment and d…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:10 AM
1

The "mistrust" argument works both ways. So just point that out. After all, if you intend for the marriage to last forever then it doesn't matter if you take these precautions. Since you intend to be with the person forever. If you're against it, then you mistrust your partner and think they'll leave you and thus want a better outcome in the divorce. Which means you are planning for the relationship's failure as well. It's better for both to take precautions when things are good, so you can both…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:02 AM
4

I agree that MGTOW as a movement makes no sense, and that is how a lot of people treat it. Which is very cult-like. "Take our magic pill or you'll suffer the consequences!" For men who "go their own way" they sure love to talk about men's issues a lot, and seem to be up in everybody's business about what they should be doing and thinking. And that they hold the one absolute truth and cure. If you want to go your own way do so. Actually do it, go your own way and exit from the equation. If you're…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:51 AM
6

Or, it's that your program is garbage. We need to help male victims, then they won't become perpetrators later in life. But we ignore male victims instead. And thus they go on to abuse women, and the cycle of violence continues and perpetuates itself. Helping all victims would be way more effective in reducing rates of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:44 AM
10

many point out how patriarchy negatively impacts men as well Yeah, they deflect real men's issues away with their "devil" patriarchy. Which amounts to "Well it's men's fault they have problems, so you should fix it by dismantling this ever present entity that can't be defeated." Which means no real solutions to men's issues, like default shared custody. Something feminists and feminist organizations like NOW have opposed in the past. And which is blamed on "patriarchy" despite the fact that the …
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:36 AM
1

Beauty is superficial. That is self evident. People just want to change it to mean something less superficial, for no reason other than so they can call everyone "beautiful". But there's no need for that. If being a good person is what is valuable, why are you redefining "beauty" to include being a good person? Wouldn't be praised for being a good person, or having a good personality be better? Why does it have to be repackaged as "beauty" for people to swallow? Ah right, because people are not …
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:43 PM
0

Learn to read. No, not everyone is attractive. And that's fine. You have worth despite that. Beauty is not more than appearance. "Beauty is only skin deep" as they say. And it's true. Worth is not beauty, and is not defined by it either.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:06 PM
1

And why is it necessary that everyone is viewed as beautiful? Because looks matter to you, and you can't see value in others unless we deem them "beautiful". You are your own worst enemy and you're too dense to see it. Enjoy that high horse of yours.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:20 PM
1

I hope you charge admission for all that projecting you do, you'd make a killing. If nobody asked for a 1:1 ratio, why'd you bring it up? Gee, I wonder. "Say they had a bar with a capacity of 200," says Ms Chadwick. "If 180 of the people in the bar are men, and they've got three security guards, there's potential for them to argue that they [the doormen] may be outnumbered. "That could put the health and safety of the staff, and the other patrons, at risk." Because the only way to not be outnumb…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:18 PM
0

And there's that feel good lie again. No, they aren't. "Looks don't matter, but everyone is beautiful" is asinine. If looks don't matter then it makes no difference if someone finds you to be an ugly slag. But you insist they be called beautiful "in their own way" so they can still cling to valuing themselves. Because all the value is being placed... on beauty. Get outta here with that nonsense. You don't need to be called beautiful to have self worth. So stop saying everyone is beautiful, becau…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:48 PM
1

Nobody asked for a 1:1 ratio, so that's a straw man The irony. I never said that someone said that. I never implied it either. I said that without a 1:1 ratio, then they'd always be outnumbered. Which is a statement of fact. So their logic is flawed. I didn't bother to keep reading beyond your ironic strawman.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:46 PM
4

Regardless of if it's satire or not, it's tumblr. I don't think it's worth getting upset over tumblr posts. If people want to go through mental gymnastics to justify this post being here to start some 'conversation'... surely there are better things to jump start that than a tumblr post.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:27 PM
1

Naive.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:11 PM
35

"Say they had a bar with a capacity of 200," says Ms Chadwick. "If 180 of the people in the bar are men, and they've got three security guards, there's potential for them to argue that they [the doormen] may be outnumbered. That's so retarded I don't even know how they couldn't realize it. With 20 women, the doomen are still outnumbered if those women decide to do something. 200 people, regardless of gender, outnumber the doormen. Unless you have security and customers set to a 1:1 ratio, then t…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:32 PM
0

Nice feminist tactic there. "Anyone that says things I dislike or disagree with are evil insert buzzword~"
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:27 PM
1

I don't think giving everyone participation awards is a good thing. Why would I think giving everyone false praise for their appearance is a good thing? It's the same "feel good" lie. No, not everyone is attractive. And that's fine. You have worth despite that. By saying "you're beautiful", that is basing all our value on our attractiveness. And the very clearly ugly people in the world will not be benefited from this. They can see what they look like, and will feel they have no value. People ca…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:25 PM
2

If everyone's handsome, no one is. People need to stop with this crap. Same people say "looks don't matter!" but then turn around and do the "everyone is beautiful!" spiel. No. Everyone is not beautiful. That's just reality. Not being beautiful doesn't mean you don't have worth or don't deserve love. These people are placing all our importance on being seen as attractive without realizing it.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:15 PM
2

You do you. I'll do me.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:17 AM
37

Boys are drugged to control their behaviors, rather than allowing them healthy outlets to expend their energy. MGM is still legal to do to boys. Younger and younger they are teaching about male privilege. It gets worse as boys get older, but it's not really great for boys at any point.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 01:32 PM
0

Not all of it is, but overall the points are stupid. At least she acknowledges that girls are encouraged to do whatever the fuck they want, a lot of feminists act like girls are still pushed to wear dresses and love pink. Which is untrue as hell.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:53 AM
5

He has spent his early years in Oakland, California, largely surrounded by adults who avoid use of the nouns "boys" and "girls" unless necessary. His world is blissfully, ignorantly gender-neutral. General ignorance. Not using boy/girl isn't going to do anything. Idiots. I grew up with people being called boys and girls, and still wanted to watch My Little Pony, the first generation. Kids will always like what htye like. "Boy" things are just more appealing to boys on average, so are marketed to…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:51 AM
27

Has she ever admitted and apologized for spreading allegations of sexual assault based on nothing but her own 'listening and believing'? Because if not, I don't care what she has to say. Especially when this itself has problems that show she's still an idiot. It's okay to dismiss people because of their identity, but it has to be "about lived experience". How can you determine someone's lived experience based on their gender, race, etc? Ah, right, you can't. You have to listen to individuals to …
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:30 AM
80

Wouldn't even say children are at this point. Particularly boys.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:27 AM
5

SNL is trash, what else is new?
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:36 AM
1

If this is true, report it to the police otherwise I have no real sympathy for you. If you can't be bothered to care about it, then why should I? Not doing so risks other people, otherwise I wouldn't care what you personally choose to do. But you do not live in a vacuum. And based on what you claim, that he's talking about how if he were '16 years old', that you look younger than you are, he's a risk to underage boys.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:33 AM
1

Robots are cool though and feminists are not.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:12 PM
3

Either a troll or just generally not worth talking to, not much difference. Bye now.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 04:31 PM
2

Disrespect of a particular woman is not misogyny. Chauvinism would be a closer word to what you want. Stop using "misogyny" in the context of "someone is a meanie to a woman". Misogyny is hatred of women. Something real. But that word no longer has any of it's actual weight or meaning, because of it's constant misuse.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 04:23 PM
1

Yeah, it's definitely a different one if parents were involved. Since the story I'm thinking of is him being 18 when he got stuck with child support. It's absurd it happens at all.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:29 PM
4

Think it's more a stigma that it's gross, thus dirty. Except that's stupid as hell. If a man has bad hygiene then his mutilated penis will also be gross and dirty. So that makes zero difference. Don't date men who don't bathe, problem solved.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 10:17 AM
2

It was a cable box. Which you don't really 'own' since you're supposed to return them.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 10:07 AM
3

He's was only made to pay once he turned 18. But that included back child support iirc. If we're talking about the same real story, I think he was 12... maybe he was 14. Really young anyway.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:04 AM
2

my daughter had already absorbed one of the most damaging lessons that all female will eventually learn in their lifetime If this is the "most damaging lesson" your daughter, and all females, will learn in their lifetime... then you have it great. Check that privilege, dear. I don't believe this story at all. Maybe up until she had him chasing them out of the store screaming at her child to smile over and over. But that just feels like editorializing a situation that was as mundane as, "An old m…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 09:00 AM
1

What's that have to do with anything? And some people believe you are "fully guilty" even when proven otherwise. What's your point? Doesn't change that the legal use of "innocent" is not the same as true innocence.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:47 AM
1

Yep. Nobody is being held at gunpoint. Sure people try to shame others to do things they want, but that isn't actual force.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:45 AM
1

If someone is comfortable being fat, why should you or I care? If they were comfortable being fat, they wouldn't demand all of us accept them as they are. We shouldn't have to accept their poor life choices. I don't accept people's drug use, smoking, drinking, etc. So why should I accept this? Nobody cares* if someone wants to kill themselves through food, just don't be a douche and demand we find you "beautiful" and "brave" while doing so. *apart from medical care, but that's a complex issue in…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:39 AM
1

The court system has statute of limitations in place for a reason. So they've already decided.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:29 AM
0

There's a stupid distinction. Legal innocence is different from regular innocence. The law doesn't use the same definitions.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:29 AM
9

Archive of the tweet it's since been deleted.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:23 AM
1

Have you read their timeline?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:23 AM
2

So feminists are right about women in bikinis selling hamburgers and how that makes men objectify women? No. Media, entertainment media, does not shape society. Media reflects society. News media is the only one that shapes society's behaviors, since they have authority when spreading bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:19 AM
7

It's got a fair amount of issues. Was really bad when Penny had that short hair, not because of her hair but the writing was terrible at that time. It's not as bad now but still kind of run it's course and should've ended awhile ago. There's only so much "Sheldon is so annoying" jokes you can stomach when the people bitching about it remain friends with him. Either don't be friends, or stfu about it already. I digress. People have legitimate criticisms of the show as well. It's not just blind ha…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:17 AM
3

Porn? Oh give me a break.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 10:09 AM
3

Yeah there's something to that. There was a recent Famitsu article that translated some English opinions to a Japanese audience, and some SJWs were whining about it and how one of the comments said "feminazi" and that Famitsu didn't translate that. And I don't think there's any translation that works for that. Not everything translates.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 08:51 AM
5

Not just that, but other social services. Which they use more than men, and men pay more for through higher taxes. Men are constantly subsidizing women. edit; Women also spend more of the household money.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 08:43 AM
2

It's why I tell my fellow gays that feminism is no friend to us. They don't care about us if it means benefiting a woman at all. Even if that woman is criminal.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 08:38 AM
1

Oh wow. A singular comment. One that doesn't even have the word 'scream' in it. Good job. where in my comment do i defend the women you illiterate fool. Name calling already. Bye.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 12:24 PM
3

No, Men don't want women to be bitches to one another. But then we wouldn't have Real Housewives to watch at our patriarchy parties...
/r/MensRights11/04/18 12:07 PM
7

Piggybacking on here, hope everyone who agrees is reporting it for that. Maybe if we do the mods will actually do something for once and remove it. This has nothing to do with men's rights. I feel like these are getting more common here. And if any mod reads my comment, spare me the "but censorship" reply. Either do something, or good people will leave and this will just become a cesspool.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:57 AM
8

Common sense is sexist these days.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:48 AM
45

That's a weird chart.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:42 AM
3

You've never been a little boy, I see. Ah, I remember being a little boy and having my mother scream at the top of her lungs at me. She'd get angry at me for wetting the bed. I did so until I was around 12 years old, my grandmother and sister tried to get her to take me to a specialist since something was clearly wrong. But she didn't care. Anyhoo, I remember being a boy and waking up in the middle of the night. And too afraid to wake her up, so I'd just grab a sheet and sleep on that. Sometimes…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:27 AM
0

because guys think they should be shouting to stand up for themselves. Noooooope. Intentionally being physically intimidating isn't the answer. That's not what people are saying. People are saying that women can be physically intimidating as well. Not just from their own strength, but their social and legal strength. A woman screaming in you face, may turn into a woman slapping you around and hitting you. And if you defend yourself, even grab her wrists to stop her hitting you, that woman may tu…
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:19 AM
1

A shouting woman is almost definitely not a physical threat to me. A shouting man may be. Then she pulls a knife and stabs you. Everyone is a potential threat, that's life.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 11:09 AM
1

Been checking this story on facebook and people are almost entirely in support of this man, and calling this out as ridiculous. It's good to see.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:26 AM
3

I usually don't read the picture captions* since they're mostly redundant information... apparently this time it was actually information they said in the article they'd not give. Who would've thought? So funny.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:05 PM
5

OOOOOOOOR, he's like the person you're replying to and not sure wtf that means and doesn't want to chance fucking it up. If she's already fighting him, then her not being happy with how he does it would end badly for him too. So better to just send her on her way.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:02 PM
1

I'm talking about the figures they use. They do not represent "equal pay for EQUAL WORK" which is why it's an earnings gap. You're falling into their terminology and allowing them power by doing so. It's not wage gap. Stop using the term. The figures they're using show the earnings gap. That's it. It's not some fucking accident feminists have made for fifty years. "Oh oops, our bad, did we get it wrong again?" Is that what you think? Girl bye.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 06:59 PM
2

The first hint of gambling issues came quickly in the relationship. ‘I knew she was into spread-betting,’ he admits. ‘She was always looking at the stock market. The lights would flash red and green on her phone. She didn’t call it gambling, though. She called it “trading”. We used to joke about it. ‘She’d say “I’m doing some trading”. I’d say “It’s betting”. But it was her money. I didn’t like it, but I didn’t have a big problem with it either.’ I have a hard time feeling sympathy for him now. …
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:31 AM
67

Well they're idiots then. lol The complainant, who 9News.com.au is not naming to avoid identifying her daughter, supplied the following statement.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:21 AM
16

Don't think a "bob" is what barbers usually deal with. Which is what this troll said her daughter's hair was. I'm sure some barbers would serve women with actual men's haircuts. But this isn't one of those instances, so it's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:11 AM
326

This is absurd. "A claim has been brought against Hunters Hill Barber Shop in the Federal Circuit Court for an alleged breach of the Sex Discrimination Act. The basis of the claim is that the barber shop refused to simply run the clippers through my daughter's undercut, because she was a girl. "I indicated to him that I did not need him to style, cut or trim the rest of her hair, which is styled in a 'bob'. This lady is just looking for ways to sue people. A bob is not a men's hair style. He pro…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:09 AM
8

"Had I know he wouldn't call me the next day, or make me his girlfriend then I wouldn't have agreed!" Basically the logic of one of those girls who accused James Franco. Flat out admitted they could've said no, but they wanted him to like them... but we should feel bad for them, because... he didn't wife them up like they imagined he would. Such a victim.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:53 AM
4

Morris was not aware of any recent examples of unfounded allegations being made against female teachers but said that "doesn't mean it doesn't happen". Because they're true.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:47 AM
9

So the quote is basically saying, "Let's lie to men by assuring them that claims won't ruin your career... and lives forever." This isn't going to happen. I would love more male teachers, but I would never ever begin to suggest to men that they go into the field. I'd do the opposite and discourage them. Sucks for our kids, but hey. This is what society has created, and men shouldn't have to be sacrificed.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:43 AM
26

it’s clearer than ever we need to put an end to sexual harassment. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. This is dangerous. You'll never "put an end to" anything. Utopian aims lead to disastrous consequences to achieve it. This is a predictable and obvious reaction from men for this "MeToo" witch hunt. But nobody cares to think anything through, they just want to cater to women's feelings and baseless claims. Just like how men react to women with suspicion when there are gender quotas …
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:39 AM
1

I wouldn't even say that. I'd say the only real solution is career chips being given out to people, like Futurama. And then you being legally required to go into that career to fill a proper role. Then you can account for minorities as well. Of course, then we'd have no freedom. But that would be the only way to "solve" the problem.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:35 AM
3

The answer is the earnings gap [a more accurate name] is a comparison between the average earnings of all full time working men and all full time working women. That's it. With no consideration for the different jobs, different hours worked, overtime, tenure, education background, personality, nothing. No variables. It's purely a comparison of average earnings. It's a pointless stat really.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:33 AM
2

You mean people buy exactly what they're sold? I'm shocked. The only context the "gender pay gap", can we stop calling it that now? It's an earnings gap... anyhoo, the only context it's brought up in is around "women get paid less for the SAME JOB!" This is exactly why it's always brought up in these contexts. To mislead and control the narrative. So of course most people would buy into the lie. Nobody wants to question women's victimization. They're sexist and comfortable viewing women as oppre…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:27 AM
6

Thanks for sharing that video! What a great person, who sees the issue for what it is.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:17 AM
1

I'm not sure if this is specifically Muslim, but some of the cultures that do FGM have it upheld by the women doing it to their daughters.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:10 AM
3

Sometimes I wonder if isn't all my father's fault - ever since I could talk, he encouraged me to hold my own in an argument. But little did he know, as he exhorted me to 'get a good degree' or add yet another language to my repertoire, he was reducing my chances of getting hitched altogether. Not only is it men's fault, but it's her father's fault for being supportive and encouraging. What an insufferable, ungrateful brat.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:18 AM
5

That's not been my recent and limited experience with it. At all. Yes it is to make fun of others, but so are a lot of subs. Wanting to laugh at people who make it a mission to tell you how smart they are doesn't mean you are insecure in your own intellect. Unless the people in this post are also insecure about their own intellect for mocking this writer.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:06 AM
1

I'll take some video games, but yeah I'd be happy with just some dick pics. I wish my fiance would send me more.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:45 AM
3

Panel 2... a bit hard but for me it still ressembles the fact that men have to initiate everything and make every decision You can interpret this to be men creating any form of art
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:26 AM
3

Yes you are. You are assuming I'm against a video showing the double standard of domestic violence. Then basing every single argument against me from that position. That much is very obvious. Otherwise you wouldn't be talking about irrelevant things. I don't care if this video is being "removed from elsewhere" or why it is removed elsewhere. We're not elsewhere, we are in r/mensrights. I don't think it's a good look to use con artists as spokes people for men's issues. And thus don't like it bei…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 03:44 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights07/04/18 03:34 PM
2

The people are scam artists. It's pretty well known, did you even read the context of my reply or are you just defending something for no reason? And the reactions are not necessarily real. If you read the context of my reply then you'd know that. So it's obvious you didn't now. I'm not talking about the acting. Yevon help this person.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 02:26 PM
3

This isn't censoring the "ugly truth" it's censoring manipulative scam artists. There's plenty of other videos to use to show the same thing and the same point without supporting terrible people in the process.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 01:45 PM
2

What is this about?
/r/MensRights07/04/18 01:19 PM
2

Ah Step 3. Created by the lie told that men "have it all" and that women "can have it all" too. Highly successful men don't have it all. Nobody can have it all. There is a finite amount of time you can invest in things. You can't exactly be a CEO of a billion dollar corporation part time so you have time to build sets for your kid's play too. That's just not possible. You have to choose what you want from life, and accept the consequences of that choice. That's life. You want a balanced life? Yo…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 01:19 PM
5

dyspareunia Had to google that. TIL. Anyhoo, as a gay man. I can understand why they would report that way. The foreskin reduces friction and allows a more fluid movement when inserted somewhere. And since it's more sensitive, men don't have to plow away like they're drilling for oil just to feel something. I'm happy my partner is intact. I wish I was as well.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 01:00 PM
1

That's what happens when you have a victim complex. Someone infers you're stupid, you assume it's because of your victim identity. In this case, female. If she were walking down the street after the rain stopped, and a car drove by over a puddle she'd probably assume it's because she is a woman. And that it was a deliberate attack on her as a woman, rather than an accident. Or just someone being an ass because they're an ass. I don't know how these people get out of bed in the morning, I truly d…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:49 PM
6

It's also legitimately sexist. Not just to women, but men. Women for obviously viewing them as incapable of harming men [physically or otherwise], and being too stupid to know better than to attack someone visibly stronger than them. And toward men for the complete and utter apathy toward their abuse. No one should have to just sit there and soak up abuse to protect their abuser. That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:31 PM
8

I'm very embarrassed to have seen this in another post and now it's own submission. These guys are full of shit. Yeah, this kind of thing happens for real, but we don't need to use scam artists as evidence.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:28 PM
5

What's political about it? Abuse is bad. Hypocrisy is bad. Pretty basic stuff. Yevon forbid. The horror of such a "political" and "offensive" discussion happening! And as someone else already pointed out there are more clear political posts in the top of the sub.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:23 PM
9

I mean, you can see non-social experiements of just general recorded drama and the same things happen. That guy in the leather 8-ball Jacket on a subway comes to mind. A woman was really going at him, screaming in his face, he stands there. She keeps doing it, then he walks off and she follows removing her stiletto and hitting him in the head with it and he turns around and slaps the bejebus out of her. Then two guys swoop in to attack hi and he fends them off too. Meanwhile the lady has that st…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:08 PM
1

Am I dumb or does this not work? Is there a time limit or something? Does it not work with adblock or firefox or something all I get is the UI, but where comments would go it's just white.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:04 PM
5

What's fun is that I find people saying that reddit is actually predominantly "anti-SJW". And it never ceases to amaze me how blind some people are to the reality around them.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:02 PM
3

I don't think it is. Both sides of the coin tend toward "never hit a woman". And both for the same reasons really. It's just common decency vs hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:01 PM
9

If they didn't try or suggest any alternatives before going to removing the foreskin, then that's a problem in and of itself. Not necessarily the grander issue at play here, but it is a common problem with phimosis. That they just go straight to circumcision. That said, it sounds like a pure act of negligence. Given both the articles posted here about it mention that the child had a bloody nose and slowed breathing, and the topic article says “After the surgery, he was taken to Post Operative Wa…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 01:22 PM
8

#GetAHigherPayingJob #WorkMoreHours #WorkOverTime So tired of this myth.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:07 PM
12

There are other ways to try and treat this 'genuine medical scenario' [phimosis], before you start hacking parts of the penis off.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 12:03 PM
2

You think the woman in the taxi cab refusing to pay and accused the driver of trying to rape her thought her actions were "extremely destructive" at all? That wasn't "impulse". That was knowing how to get what you want, and knowing there's no consequence for doing so. Not all false accusations are the result of lack of impulse control, like eating the entire pringles can instead of just 5 like you planned. She didn't want to pay, and knew that crying rape/assault would let her get what she wante…
/r/MensRights02/04/18 06:31 AM
4

"Unless you accuse my husband." Great strategy guys. No problems at all. Still can't believe they didn't see anything wrong with that.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 05:50 AM
3

Compared to losing your job from being labeled a rapist, it's nothing. Not specifically about this case, just in general that is often what happens to men falsely accused. And then that's on the internet forever. Even if she admits to lying, that won't be what comes up when you google his name.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 05:48 AM
2

I really doubt the kind of person who falsely accuses someone of rape thinks about the personal consequences of their actions. Because there largely aren't consequences to consider. If you face no real consequence... why not be a vengeful asshole? They're just out for revenge. And the law enables their vengeance.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 05:44 AM
10

I think far more women feel entitled to men's bodies than men do to women's bodies. Since they're given a pass on doing so, and often praised. "You go girl!" It's how they feel "liberated" it seems, to sexually assault men. Straight men would often rather strip for gay men since gay men have boundaries set. And clubs will actually protect them from gay men's abuse if it happens. But straight clubs would rather protect their client base than their dancers. Women also sexually harass and assault/g…
/r/MensRights31/03/18 07:26 AM
3

There was one specific instance of this, fake ID and everything iirc, and the mother didn't want to press charges because she acknowledged that her underage daughter lied to the man. But he was still gone after despite protest from the "victim" and the mother of the "victim". I think in terms of deceit, it's hard to claim they're a victim. For teachers though, they know the age of their students and they know they have a power dynamic and should stay away from their students period.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 07:13 AM
7

Yeah, my grandpa before cancer got him was very active. He went to garage sales and estate sales all the time, would go out and chat with his friends around town. He would also watch documentaries. My fiance is approaching retirement age and beyond work he loves to read books about history, and mysteries. Enjoys watching Teaching Company lectures and loves to travel. None of that is going to just stop when he's retired. He just won't be stressed out by his job anymore.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 07:06 AM
0

Never said it'd be proof of anything. And you didn't answer the question either.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:42 PM
1

How old are you? Where did your mother live? Because if abortion was a legal option, as much as you won't like that concept, she very much would've had a choice if it was legal. Even if it's not something she's morally okay with, she still had a choice. He bailed prior to her giving birth. She had time, presumably, to get an abortion. Instead, she decided to go it alone. That's a choice. Your example isn't one of no choice. That's actually great for her, as she could make an informed decision on…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 06:07 AM
0

Well, look back before the laws changed to give women children by default. Men used to get default custody, did we have all these problems then?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:54 AM
3

You can't view them as a rape victim and remain impartial. To have a rape victim, you have to have a rapist. That's why we're in this mess to begin with. Because people always refer to the accuser as "victim". You can't have a victim without a perpetrator. And they are already pointing the finger at somebody. It's fine on a personal level to believe somebody saying, "I was raped". There's no accusation with that. So there's no actual harm. But when they start accusing specific people of it, I'm …
/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:39 AM
2

Remove all the shitty magazines from the checkout lane, and remove the candy too. Obesity is a much bigger problem than the myth of "objectification". Leave it for shit like batteries.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:29 AM
3

Feminism denies that men can be victims, of anything, ever. They say men are victims of "patriarchy" and "toxic masculinity". But that's nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 04:20 AM
5

But he's hot. /s I don't even think he's attractive, but then I find his personality and pandering repugnant so that's probably why.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 04:19 PM
1

And I think buttplugs are disgusting, but you know what? That just means I don't buy one. And life goes on. The fact there are probably people right now with a buttplug shoved in their asshole doesn't affect me anymore than the fact there are probably people right now fucking a doll. You can not like it, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't be able to masturbate or have sex in ways that you dislike. They're not hurting anybody, so why put any effort into caring about it?
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:45 PM
13

No one gives a shit if an adult wants to circumcise their dick. People have a problem with forcing it on babies. Only circlejerk is people like you unable to see what's wrong with that and deciding this is a hill to die on with no valid reasons why. Because there isn't any.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:27 PM
6

Yeah your dried out, scarred dick is so much more attractive. /s No it isn't. Only people that "prefer" it are those who are "used to it". The same people would find having no ears more attractive if we'd been cutting them off everybody for generations too.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:25 PM
16

Another gem comparison to put in the pile with "fingernails". Hair grows back genius. Foreskin doesn't. We also don't feel our hair being cut.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 03:23 PM
3

Chill.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 05:05 AM
4

I'll "chill" when ignorant people stop spreading their bullshit that attempts to justify the mutilation of babies and children. And comments aren't just for you, get over yourself. Inform yourself AHEAD of time. Rather than spew ignorance.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 03:02 AM
5

has no consequences when done CORRECTLY False. The glands will harden over time. Unavoidable. The penis will dry out. Unavoidable. It's scarred. Unavoidable. There are additional issues that can arise that aren't worth the bullshit "benefits". Antibiotics do the job to fight UTIs, and the foreskin itself already helps with that. That's why it's fused to the head of the penis at birth, to help prevent them. STD "prevention" is false, there's no evidence that supports this. There's no evidence to …
/r/MensRights24/03/18 02:55 AM
14

Trina is a female rapper. She literally posted an image saying this a few minutes ago; "Any man can fuck you, feed you and buy you shit... but it takes a real man to help you become a better woman, to build with you and work with you in building a better life" Don't take it too seriously. Should speak for itself being it's facebook and a meme on facebook no less. Facebook is awful. Edit; lots of comments that are against the message in the image(s) too with lots of likes
/r/MensRights24/03/18 02:43 AM
2

Where'd I say you said that? I said that because people often will shift the goal post to be about "well people see it as bad for a girl to wear a boy shirt/vise versa, and that should change!" When that's stupid. So I brought it up to avoid someone, anyone, responding with that argument. And way to ignore the rest that was about you. Because there's nothing you can say about it, because nothing is stopping anybody from doing what they want. So there is no argument to be had.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:31 PM
3

The video kind of disproves the entire "problem". They put boys in girls clothes and vise versa... and nothing stopped them from doing so. In other words, there is no problem.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:30 PM
2

And even if a girl does like astronauts, and a boy glitter hearts, they can still buy that and wear it. Nothing is stopping them. It's just practical to have girl and boy sections to fit the vast majority and make it easy for them to find what they mostly want. Is it really a problem to have to go to the girl's section for a glitter heart shirt as a boy? No. Who cares? Same applies to the reverse.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:12 PM
2

Literally nothing is stopping a person from buying whatever they want from a store and wearing it. I buy women's socks all the time and I'm a man. I like the material better and I like the colors and designs. I also buy women's shaving cream. I have yet to have the patriarchy stop me at the register and arrest me for breaking gender roles. Because that's not reality. You already can do whatever the fuck you want. Just do it. People having opinions on what you do isn't a problem, just don't care.…
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:06 PM
2

Don't watch it?
/r/MensRights23/03/18 04:03 PM
2

You forgot the gem that "men feel entitled to women's attention/bodies". It's not a gender issue, it's an asshole issue. And men and women can be assholes.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:57 PM
2

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. They deserve people making a mockery of their silly laws like this. Good for this woman taking control of her life! If they have a problem with this, they're clearly transphobic and misogynist!
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:52 PM
18

The "you don't remember" logic is stupid. A baby won't have proper memories about anything that happens, does that mean you can use them as an ashtray or throw them like a football? No. That's abuse. And if they survive said abuse, that will have a lasting effect on the brain. I really don't understand how people think that trauma won't affect a baby's development.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:39 PM
1

Sure they lack some self control sigh I'm so over talking about this with people who say shit like this and don't understand what they're saying goes against their own argument. They lack self control, so it's fine for teachers to take advantage of this along with their immaturity, and complete ignorance of life and sex without any legal repercussion. Nah. I'd rather encourage adults [teachers] to stay away from them than enable them.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:27 PM
1

Personal responsibility has to come into play at a certain point. I just think the teacher has more personal responsibility in that situation.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:10 PM
2

And that's fine.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 08:07 PM
1

For face cream, I don't agree. We can have face cream without it, and we do. Most of it doesn't use foreskin cells as far as I'm aware.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:26 PM
1

Edit: And let's not forget that most men get erections when they do not want them, for no apparent reason. I definitely never consented to wake up almost every day with an erection! I don't get get why some men don't grasp this. I've seen men make these dumb arguments sometimes and it's super confusing. If anyone should get it, we should. I mean, we've all been teenagers who had erections in class for no reason and hoping we weren't called up to the chalk/whiteboard to solve a problem, or that i…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:21 PM
2

It's probably a door to a kitchen. I've seen the same layout in fast food restaurants in my home down. Generally older buildings. I remember Burger King being like that. Generally in renovations they'd move them though, because it's gross to have bathrooms so close to the kitchen.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:16 PM
8

moonwalk away*
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:36 PM
1

I have no idea why people want to defend teachers banging their students so badly. Let me remind you of something you seem to have forgotten from your last comment, dear. power dynamic All factors should be considered. Yeah, this isn't some 18 year old living on their own who meets a teacher at a club or something. It's their student. And teachers shouldn't fuck their students, period. Context is entirely irrelevant, because of the power dynamic and the role that teachers are supposed to play in…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:27 PM
0

Compared to adults they don't have any real idea about sex. They're ignorant; think they know everything, but know very, very little about the real world. Including sex. Teachers shouldn't fuck any student. It's not that hard to fathom. Stop defending adults who can't control themselves.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:22 PM
7

Even if we called what you're talking about something that isn't "rape", then they should still face time in my opinion. Teachers need to not fuck their students under any circumstances. If they do, I think they deserve time. No matter how much of a "victim" they are for having a 18 year old student "come on to them" and them being soooooooooooooo helpless as to not be able to turn down the sexual proposition from a teenager that they hold authority over. Oh right, they aren't a victim. They're …
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:37 PM
3

Nope. The person I responded to said that they "have a hard time putting someone behind bars just because they are a teacher or professor". Not that they had "sex" with a student, which is what you just linked. Teachers are adults. Now re-read my last comment for the rest so I don't have to repeat myself further.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:11 PM
4

I'm speaking from myself too. And I thought I was mature back around those ages too. And while in comparison to some peers, I was, I was still stupid and ignorant. Thinking back on some of the things I used to think makes me embarrassed. I was an idiot, just like we all were [or will be] at that age. We think we're adults at that point and know everything, but we definitely don't. If I could go back in time and slap myself for some of the stuff I did/said/thought, I would. lol
/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:11 PM
15

I have a hard time putting a person behind bars just because they are a teacher or professor. Please cite the last teacher in jail solely for being a teacher. We would put them away for banging kids, kids they have authority over. Teachers are adults, so if you don't want to go to jail/prison then don't fuck your students. If they don't get that, they sure as hell shouldn't be teaching kids. Let alone "having sex" with them.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 07:53 PM
13

No one is sexually oblivious at 16. They are compared to adults, which is why adults should fuck off and stay away from them. 16-17 year olds are idiots. 18-19 are pretty dumb too. I'd like to move the age up to 20, but that's never going to happen.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 07:51 PM
3

But there is a complete lack of ability on this sub to even consider that another point of view could be valid, Did you ever consider that we have already done so and come to the conclusion that it is not valid? I have thought a lot of these issues, and there's nothing I can really hang my hat on from SJW types. Other than the term 'pansexual' which I think serves a purpose for transsexuals and people who don't care about that kind of thing. Because I think being homo/hetero/bi doesn't mean you'…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 12:13 AM
14

If I had a daughter, I wouldn’t want her to think this is how society sees her, Then don't spread the lie that this is how society sees her? People keep saying this, and I don't see it at all. All I see are people saying it. No actual evidence that this is actually how men see women in society. People only really seem to use "objectification" for this. But where is any actual data that says that sexualization of women [or men] leads to the mistreatment or devaluation of women [or men]? I include…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:45 PM
37

There are no victims here. Meanwhile women shove disembodied dicks inside them, and nobody argues that they're treating men as only good for a dicking. Nor should they, because that's stupid. Rather than being happy with disembodied vaginas [flesh lights/pocket pussies/whatever] like most women are happy with their dildos and vibrators, men actually seem to want something as close to human as possible. Because to men, women already are more than "fuckable objects". They long for the intimacy you…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:28 PM
1

it's about representation and considering the views of both genders. You can consider the views of both genders without being a part of both genders. You think feminists would be happy if all the women in government were Sarah Palin clones? I doubt it. It's almost like women don't always agree on things. Meanwhile, there are men who have the opposite views of Sarah Palin that actually do align with what feminists claim to want. AND women are the bigger voting power, at least in the US. So... the…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:23 PM
8

It's not even a direct accusation of anything. Probably a way to avoid legal troubles by claiming something serious. What a useless tweet. The timing and vagueness are fishy to say the least. edit; and looking at twitter, most people support this too. Even people asking for more context are shut down. One of which got this response from her when you’re driving and see a STOP sign, do you need more info before you hit the brakes? wat
/r/MensRights20/03/18 01:31 PM
4

I don't care if people don't like reality. I'm not going to spin lies that make people feel good just because "it'll work". And it won't either, because it hasn't. The lie that all FGM is the removal of the clitoris hasn't stopped FGM in third world countries. Nor has it helped MGM at all. In fact, that lie has successfully diverted our gaze away from the suffering of all these boys because removal of the clitoris is "so much worse" than just "losing some skin". So FGM gets treated as a complete…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 01:09 PM
11

Because spreading misinformation isn't going to actually help stop it and protect all children from it. Not worrying about which one is worse Ah projection. 2 hours earlier While it's not a competition and they're both bad, FGM is objectively worse than male circumcision. Gee can't imagine why you'd say that. It's almost like the entire reason your comment was there was to highlight how much worse it is for women. Oh right it was, hence the misinformation and conflation of the worst forms of FGM…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:39 PM
2

If you're referring to Jordan Peterson, I never heard of him until that "interview". She made a fool of herself in it. That is why people hate her, because she's bad at what she does.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:36 PM
3

In terms of "it's skin" yes, but the clitoral hood doesn't have 20k+ nerve endings in it. And doesn't serve as important a role to the vagina as the foreskin does to the penis. MGM and FGM aren't really comparable directly. Since the penis and vagina are different. (shocker) So even if a procedure to remove skin is similar between removing foreskin and the clitoral hood, the foreskin and clitoral hood are not the same. So it's still an inaccurate comparison.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:32 PM
8

FGM is designed to make the woman feel no joy from sex and they are normally left with zero sex drive. Like a "cold fish". While it's not a competition and they're both bad, FGM is objectively worse than male circumcision. That's untrue. Stop conflating the worst forms of FGM for ALL of them. A pin prick is one method of FGM used, and that is not done to "make women feel no joy from sex". Removal of the clitoral hood doesn't affect their sexual enjoyment either as far as I'm aware. Plus, if wome…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:31 PM
2

but you don't think using gay in a derogatory fashion is unhelpful at least? No. And I think the implication that it is "unhelpful" or worse, "homophobic" is more damaging. Then you're setting up young gay kids to be hurt by "that's gay". And that's retarded. I had real problems growing up, and was convinced that kind of thing mattered. And I later realized, that no it didn't. It just added unnecessary hurt to me, hurt that I caused myself by taking it in a way that it wasn't meant. And I did th…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:43 AM
10

People are crazy in every country. Water is wet. More at 11.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:40 AM
1

It’s in no way dried out hahaha! Yes it is. It's one of the unavoidable effects of circumcision. The glands dry out and harden over time. I'm not insecure, I'm cut too. I know exactly what penises look like because I'm a gay man. Are you? No. You aren't. I've had more experience with cocks than you.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 10:50 AM
0

So the answer is no, you don't. I never said either were a big issue, but there is a difference.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:37 PM
0

You don't see a difference in the tone of "women are confusing" and "men are stupid"?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:02 PM
1

I'd say, a strong woman will have the ability for introspection and consider if she actually did have an attitude if a man says she did/does. Rather than assume he's "a weak man" and dismiss any criticism of her as invalid because "weak man" [sexism]. If you can't do that, you fail as a person honestly. And you are hardly "strong".
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:01 PM
10

I'm so tired of people arguing in favor of mutilating babies. I used to wonder what the line around my penis was as a kid.When I learned why that scar is there, and what it meant. It pissed me off. When I look at my baby pictures, I just think about how they could do that to me when I was defenseless. And people are okay with it. Because they can't look beyond their own idiocy. No one cares if you're fine with your dick, that isn't a justification to keep mutilating babies. Stop being stupid. I'…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:33 PM
6

Nope. Your dick looks dried out and is scarred. Sorry. Whether it's ugly depends on the penis itself. Some are just ugly, and some aren't, they're like people that way. Every girl I’ve been with says they gag when thinking about going down on an uncircumcised penis, most try to avoid it. Sure they do. And I get legitimately sad looking at a dried out dick. Meanwhile I see an uncut dick, where the head of the penis isn't dried out and my mouth waters. And when you pull the foreskin back... it loo…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:27 PM
7

Ah sure, just hop in the time machine and talk to our parents about it so we don't have our human rights violated. Great idea.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:20 PM
3

Clearly you've never taken anything inside of you. I'd rather have 30 seconds of good sex than a bunch of unnecessary pounding away, particularly when they don't have foreskin to lessen the friction going on so you gotta use excess lube to make up for it.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:18 PM
5

That's usually a discussion a family has before that kind of instance happens at all. My family has known I value quality of life over just having life since before I was even 20 years old. No way I want to "live" on life support. That isn't living. If you don't have that talk, that's kind of on you. You can also put that in your will, as far as I'm aware. And you can appoint a person in your family to make these decisions too. So not at all comparable.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:12 PM
5

All have the scar. Some of the scars look better than others, but the scar is unavoidable. I'm also gay and my fiance is uncut, while I'm not. And the difference is obvious. My penis is dry, not as dry as it will be I'm still relatively young but it'll only get worse. And we've been together 10 years, and I'm already starting to lose more sensitivity and it gets harder to have sex comfortably. Too much lube and I feel nothing, not enough and it's painful for my partner. And functionally, the for…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:10 PM
8

They fact they would "hate" having to wait to be an adult to do it, means they don't want their genitals cut. If you're so okay with it, you'd imagine they'd have no issue with having it done as an adult either. But they, like all men, wouldn't purposefully want harm done to their dick. We winch at a guy kicked in the balls, let alone being mutilated. The very idea, as a functioning adult is insane. The only reason men choose it [like in Africa] is due to outright lies about it's "benefits". And…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 12:01 PM
4

This is a family cultural thing and not your decision. No it isn't. It's our body. Not theirs. What if it's a family's cultural thing to cut off ear lobes? Or remove fingernails? Or eyelids? It's our body. Not theirs.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:55 AM
23

Plenty of people make fun of feminism Yeah nobodies on the internet, or people speaking to a room of like 30 people which get protests and interruptions from feminists. And are labeled "rape apologists, sexist, anti-gay, white nationalist, nazis, blah blah blah". There's no mainstream backlash against feminism. A celebrity saying they're not a feminist gets pushed into apologizing. Who is pushed to apologize when they say outright bigoted things about men? Who has lost their job for opposing the…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:50 AM
1

If you care about actual victims, you will not pit them against each other for who has it worse. And when people chime in about that you'll tell them to fuck off and get over themselves.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:42 AM
3

Thank you. Came to same thing. Yes some feminists are this extreme, but not even most of them are. Let alone "all" as "they" implies. edit; even with people saying "they" was used to refer to one person I don't think that was the intent. Looking at their profile, it looks like almost all bait too. So I don't know how people are acting so naive about OP's intentions.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:30 AM
6

He said if he had been asked, he would have said no. And that he wanted his first kiss to be with someone he cared about, not some narcissistic celebrity. Not his words there, but that's what Katy is. Given these, can you really act as though he was totally fine with it? And not just fine with it because that's what people expect? And he had to work through it with friends as it "not really counting" as his first kiss too. Sounds like he's only saying this to protect her. Would you trust the wor…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:22 AM
20

I love 'Ur So Gay'. As a gay man. I don't think homophobia should be used so flippantly.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 11:19 AM
2

Yeah let's protect all those sexually active infants from STDs by mutilating them? You know we're talking about babies right? Anything related to sex shouldn't even be a part of this topic.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:29 PM
5

Anti-biotics do the job without the need of mutilation.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:26 PM
3

So gay culture isn't that great? As a gay man, no not really. Lots of us don't care about "gay culture" or the "LGBTlaundrylist community". I agree that if we do one we should do the other though. I have no issues with "straight pride" parades. If we get them, why can't they have them? I personally would rather NOT have gay "pride" parades at this point as they're mostly a bunch of nonsense. And I'm not alone in that either, a lot of gay people don't like them. But good luck arguing to remove th…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:19 PM
2

Legally it is if a woman tricks a man into pregnancy. Even if a woman forces a man into pregnancy. Right now in American men are being forced to pay money to the women that raped them. Doesn't even have to be a man. It can be an underage boy, and come his 18th birthday he can be made to pay child support to his rapist.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:15 PM
2

It is Vancouver, so that's probably why.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:12 PM
4

I remember reading it was video games that caused Toys R Us all these problems too. Seems like everyone is just going to blame whatever they feel like. :/
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:09 PM
30

And then people wonder why boys don't recognize when they've been assaulted? "Girls bear the brunt" of it, so boys aren't going to think what happens to them is abuse. Since that's something that girls experience, not boys. And the cycle continues. sigh So annoying. Who fucking cares who has it worse? It's not the Olympics. You don't get a prize for winning. It's entirely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 03:02 PM
7

Boys, however, require ‘a clear sense of purpose and a reason why it’s worth bothering’. Yes. And that's why I like the idea of gendered schools. So we can tailor lessons based on how each gender learns best. Generally I don't like segregation, but I think in terms of learning. At least in primary education, it would benefit both. ‘Boys thrive on praise and rapid response,’ she says. Yes, they do. My best moments in school were 3rd and 4th grade, despite having the same home troubles I had a tea…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 10:14 AM
1

redefined the word out of meaning. Well that ship sailed long ago.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:46 AM
5

So much for "be the change you want to see".
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:45 AM
4

Did you... even read the tweet? They said "remember when people thought he a misogynist because" not "he's a misogynist because". They* weren't personally calling him one in that tweet.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:44 AM
1

Heaven as dictated by organized religion. The idea of heaven can exist outside of the limits of organized religion's existing rules for it. But yes, most people who buy into that kind of thing will be doing so from organized religion. So it's odd to see those people who think you have to believe or burn in hell, turn around and talk about a non-believer being in heaven.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:43 AM
1

It's been posted here many times before
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:28 AM
2

This was posted directly ages ago here. Look for it and you'll find it.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:25 AM
1

Well, there’s some truth to the fact that we need to recognize the achievements of women and minorities who haven’t been recognized, some of who even had the credit flat out stolen from them. Do we? Do most people really give two shits about who invented the things they use daily? I think they don't.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:23 AM
4

A boy who had his penis destroyed in a botched "circumcision" was raised as a girl initially, and he had a lot of problems and ended up killing himself. No exactly the same as this obviously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer But I think it's just something nobody can really do without some kind of fuckery happening. I don't think it's healthy to try to be someone you aren't in general, and this is taking that to a complete extreme of redefining your entire being as something you aren't…
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:22 AM
3

or spend our time muttering epithets like 'hey ya fuckin' queer'. I mean, maybe if she did this when she was like 12-14 and thus was hanging out with tweens and young teenage boys. At that point kids are rebellious edgelords.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 09:14 AM
3

“She told me that she does not intend to sit about doing nothing, and I accept her statement,” the judge wrote in a 1996 decision. In 1996? And it took this long for somebody to cut her off? I mean, it's clear the Judge had no intention of her just sitting on her ass for over 20 years. And the article states that she didn't even get custody of the children, so what the fuck does she need "support" for? Her not having a job was her own choice. As we see by her doing nothing to get one when she co…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 09:24 AM
5

Oprah does it too. It's vile.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 08:42 AM
24

“Fine, I’m a horrible racist asshole. What do I do about it? I can’t re-program myself to find men of color more attractive,” some of you might be saying. Actually, you can. Yevon help us, this idiot is literally using arguments you'd find in gay conversion camps.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:05 PM
15

It's called a preference for a reason. Everyone is allowed to "have" a preference, it's not even really an active choice. It's just what we prefer, and thus are most likely to be interested in. I very much agree that people shouldn't say things like "no blacks" however. I think that's a stupid thing to put in some dating service or whatever, and I think that there's always exceptions to preferences. But I fail to see how that's exclusive to "gay, white men". I generally don't find red heads attr…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:00 PM
1

Yeah, but nobody is looking at the gender of the manager/owner [not sure the role they mean] when picking a restaurant. So what problem is this solving?
/r/MensRights15/03/18 01:35 PM
1

I see no issue with this.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 01:25 PM
6

Don't think it cleans skin more though does it? I'd imagine it'd make you sticky.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 01:22 PM
1

Nobody even knows who owns most restaurants. Or cares for that matter. Unless it's some celebrity who owns it, but they are not likely to be running it.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 12:51 AM
10

Even ignoring that, it's scarred every time. That in and of itself is clear evidence of damage.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:34 AM
8

"I wanted my son to make happy a shallow bitch, instead of find a woman that will love him for him!" That argument never makes sense to me. Why would you want your son with somebody that would demand he change his GENITALS to please her? That's stupid. That's not a partner anybody should want. Let alone for their own kids when they grow up.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:32 AM
3

child SEX abuse Kind of missed a word there. Not called rape, sure, but it can't be "anything" either.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:28 AM
3

Unless it's owned/named after some celebrity or some famous cook, but even then who manages the location or who is actually cooking is probably something most people don't know. I sure as hell don't know who runs where I eat, and I honestly don't give a shit. Is the food good? Yes. That's what matters.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:26 AM
1

You're just fucking with me at this point At that point, yes, because you're being ridiculous. So I responded in kind, and still managed to not insult you. Yet, I'm the "kid". so I'll have to be the bigger person here and ignore your from now on. Be. You're just trying to pull excuses out of your ass because you're embarrassed that you're using a kid's term as a 30 year old. I'd be embarrassed too. The. I can just imagine the emo behind the computer. You're probably just some dumbass emo kid. "I…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:47 PM
1

Yeah and who made it regain that popular usage? Kids did and they are the ones who use it the most in the present day, so my argument still stands. Your argument was they "invented" it. So no, it does not stand by completely changing it. That pretty much seals the coffin on your argument. You're just trying to pull excuses out of your ass because you're embarrassed that you're using a kid's term as a 30 year old. I'd be embarrassed too. All someone did was write "cuck" and you replied with "crin…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 10:30 PM
2

That's... not at all relevant to my point. SJW trash on everything, percieved or real, that is "homophobic" or "problematic". What's that got to do with SNL and "political correctness"? SNL is very much a SJW "comedy" show anyway. But why do they avoid being called homophobic for making jokes that any comedian on campuses across the US would be attacked by SJWs over? Why are they immune to the rabid perpetually offended? Since when do SJWs ever take "jokes are jokes" as a valid defense? What on …
/r/MensRights13/03/18 10:25 PM
2

Does it really matter? He wasn't feeling it, for whatever reason, and she showed she's a shitty person in how she reacted. So he's better off without her.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:08 AM
1

Meh, I'll use retarded. I don't care. It's more apt than stupid in some cases about certain things. Always has been, which is why people use it that way instead of to describe the mentally challenged.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:06 AM
1

"Cringe" was already a word. It's just regained popular usage, according to google it's more popular since 2010 than it was in the early 1800s. The usage hasn't even changed... it's the same word. experience an inward shiver of embarrassment or disgust. "I cringed at the fellow's stupidity" synonyms: wince, shudder, squirm, feel embarrassed, feel mortified "it makes me cringe when I think of it" Thinking kids invented the word "cringe" is absurd.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:03 AM
1

I mean it's better than "soyboy" that is so much worse in my book. Both make me embarrassed to be human. We should be able to articulate an issue more maturely. "Cuck" makes you sound like a petulant child.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 10:57 AM
4

Diversity is important Not diversity of artificiality. That's not important. Who cares if there's some "diverse" rainbow cast but every character is bland and worthless? Diversity of thought, and experience are important. Not race. Not gender. Not sexuality. Those are superficial.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 10:51 AM
7

SNL is hypocritical all the time. They made fun of lesbians with tired stereotypes about them, to parody some shallow gay men show, so I don't know why they're not lambasted for being homophobic or something. Granted, I don't look up news about the show so maybe people are. My fiance keeps watching the show and sometimes asks me to watch a part and it's always so bad that I don't know why he keeps torturing me. lol
/r/MensRights13/03/18 10:48 AM
1

Full panel
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:25 PM
1

It's also like the DeFranco stuff, those women were full of it. Did you see their 'interview' where they basically admit that they could have left or said no, but as one said "but I wanted him to like me". What are you, five? Time to put on your big girl panties, ladies. Good grief.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:20 PM
3

Exactly. Karen has it right, you only argue with these people when there are other people around to see it. Then you're not arguing to change their mind, you're arguing to sway anybody on the fence or willing to listen to other arguments who may be reading.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:12 PM
1

Most people do not support these divisive concepts from feminism, even if they tacitly support other things feminists do. These things are why the general public dislike the term "feminist". They aren't aware of the worse things they do. So, I do not subscribe to use of this term and never will. It's a stupid term used to simply dismiss men's issues as "men's fault" and to blame men and masculinity for all bad things in the world. And to falsely claim they "support men's issues" by opposing it. …
/r/MensRights12/03/18 12:08 PM
1

I don't think the comments reflect this title at all. edit; Whoever downvoted me, explain how most comments calling out the OP as ridiculous are "indicative of the misandry and sexual assault hysteria". I read all of them, did you?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:59 AM
4

I grew up in middle America in the 90s and took baths with my two older sisters at my grandpa's house somewhere in that age range, young enough to barely remember. And took a bath with my male cousin at my grandma's house who was a year younger than I. It wasn't a big deal, it wasn't sexual at all. I used to kiss my mom and grandmas on the lips as a little boy too. It was innocent. And as I got older, it just naturally stopped. We've gone too far. Yes, someone shouldn't kiss someone who doesn't …
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:58 AM
1

#StopMemesplaining /s
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:55 AM
1

How predictable. I know you'd accuse me of "stalking". Your profile is public, as are the comments you make. Get off the internet if you don't like people checking if you're full of shit. And those don't disprove anything I said. Those are nothing. They're low level upvote bait.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:28 AM
8

Women are aware that human history is a history of their oppression, and that current year is still a reflection of that history. Depends on how you define oppression. Do so, and I'm willing to bet that men fall into the exact same definition you give. Because you'll probably talk about lack of options, lack of freedom. You may talk about it differently, "Women weren't allowed to work!" Even though women did work throughout history but that's another problem. Nobody had choice, other than the we…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:20 AM
3

I'm not an MRA, since I don't really do any advocacy so calling myself one is disingenuous. However, I talk about men's issues. And for me, I'm for legal prostitution. Regulation would help protect sex workers from exploitation from pimps and costumers. And, in theory, would help combat sex trafficking and slavery; not sure how large of a problem this is in western countries though. If it's not legal, people are going to do it anyway. I think it's hard to argue against it when pornography is leg…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:44 AM
2

It is just stupid lazy marketing. Doesn't even make sense to me. I mean, if you remove the "like a woman" part it makes some sense. "Invest because money is power". But, how do you "invest like a woman"? What's different for investing as a woman than as a man? I know it's trying to do some "girl power" marketing, but this is just a strange way to go about it.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:33 AM
6

They're projecting. Women have ingroup bias, so they think that men do too. But it's the opposite. Men have outgroup bias. Not all obviously, but individuals don't change the average. It is very much like they live in an alternative universe. It's really strange how they can't see what's very observable.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:28 AM
1

Yeah, years of articles and posts here from subscribers that constantly argue against the concept of 'toxic masculinity' and call out those who do. That isn't going to suddenly change over night to the complete polar opposite. But you're not "arguing" [accusing] in good faith. Look at your post history. I went back a month and the only /r/mensrights post you've made are... in here. Hmmmm. I go back further and over 2 months ago I find one and it's.... another highly voted up submission with over…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:17 AM
1

Vast majority of the human population don't buy into feminism ideology deep enough to attach themselves to "toxic masculinity" as a concept. So no thanks.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:53 AM
3

Of course, everyone should have the option. The more options the better.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:52 AM
2

I was flat out stating that people that don't subscribe or frequent this sub were vote manipulating. I made no distinction, because it doesn't matter beyond the fact they are not "the voting population here" as you claimed. Try again.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:48 AM
1

I said nothing about feminists in my comment. Interesting you'd bring them up. I'm a regular here, and have been for years. I know the common positions of the people here. And it is not filled with people that upvote "toxic masculinity" as a valid position. It's the opposite in fact. You said the "voting population here" agrees with you. But they don't. People from elsewhere are coming and voting.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:02 AM
6

If you think all men are going to take it, then I have news for you.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 04:59 AM
16

Of course it would. Male pill = less pregnancies against a man's will by "accident" Financial Termination = Women can make an informed decision on if they want to commit to single motherhood
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:12 PM
4

Being "tough" and "repressing issues" are not the same things. Cinderella [Disney] was tough. She knew her situation was shitty, but she remained strong. She had a few lapses when things got really traumatic, the dress being destroyed. But all in all, she remained tough. She was not repressing her reality. But she also wasn't balled up in her room crying all day, which is far more unhealthy than how she acted.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:57 PM
0

There's tons of infighting when feminists aren't here brigading. If you came here, ever, you'd know that. Go to any circumcision post for a prime example.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:55 PM
7

No, people are caught up in academic, political and media feminism. Nobody cares about tumblr. People laugh at tumblr feminists with their 5,000 genders. People hate feminism because of the leaders and organizations in it. Perpetuating the wage gap myth, rape culture myth and hysteria, National Organization for Women opposes default shared custody; and feminists blame default custody going to women on 'patriarchy', but women asked for it so men gave it to them. Patriarchy theory. Redefining sexi…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:53 PM
8

Toxic masculinity is not why men lose their families, why women do not allow them to see their children, why government doesn't fund domestic violence shelters for men, why some countries have redefined legal rape to exclude men who are raped by women, why feminists and feminist organizations like the National Organization for Women oppose default shared custody at every turn. Toxic masculinity is not why the boys Boko Haram burned alive got no world wide outrage when Bring Back Our Girls was go…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:35 PM
5

The voting population here Yeah, it's totally normal for people supporting the term "toxic masculinity" as valid to be upvoted on /r/mensrights.... oh wait, no it isn't. It's almost like there are outside people coming in and voting on things they shouldn't be... hmmm<sup>mmmm</sup>^<sup>mmmm.</sup>
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:25 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:23 PM
18

'DAE feminists' Not even sure what that means. But to claim that "toxic masculinity" doesn't have "anything to do with feminists" is laughable.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:00 PM
72

Did this hit all or something? So many people getting lots of upvotes defending this absurd term. Toxic masculinity is ridiculous. Nevermind that the same feminists who say things like that also say things like "masculinity so fragile" when men do try to talk about anything. It's just a way to attack men. It's not a legitimate term. Nor is toxic femininity. I'd prefer to refer to any toxic behavior... as toxic behavior. Rather than be a sexist idiot. But I guess if people want to be sexist, that…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:33 AM
1

It'll work on people who are not bigots looking to justify their bigotry. Some people just need to reframe something in their head to come to a different conclusion, or for the wheels to start to turn.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:14 AM
5

Not until we fix society's views of men around children will I support this. It's too risky for men. One false accusation, or even a parent thinking he's "creepy" and their career is over forever and his life is ruined.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:47 PM
2

It's November 19...
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:43 PM
3

I know there are some women only compartments somewhere, can't remember where. Pretty sure somewhere in Asia? I know it was heavily populated area at least. But I'm opposed to that too. I think that specific thing is a scapegoat to get around dealing with over population and lack of space in public transit. Which not only has people bumping into each other and having no personal space, allowing for misinterpretations of said bumping into each other. But allows for actual perverts to cop a feel a…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:55 AM
12

Imagine the demographics of this bus happen to be all white women and black men. It's now racist. In yet, they thought this was a good idea because they framed it with genders. If you're ever in doubt, either flip the genders or reframe it about race to see if it's bigoted or not. It's yet to fail in my experiments.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:51 AM
3

Some people flip flop when it's convenient to their own narrative.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:49 AM
1

No shit. Doesn't mean we throw away our legal system. You realize attitudes like you are why lynching of black men happened right? But hey, let's hold you to your own logic. You raped me. Therefore, no one should hire you or give you housing. No one should interact with you at all since it's out there on the internet. After all, it would be a shame if you hired or dealt with a rapist. Can't take those risks. You may harm your female loved ones. Not an appeal to emotion at all. Nope.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 07:33 AM
29

“It wasn’t like I was doing them any favors,” she continues. “They were doing us a favor by joining our roster. And, you know, we’re looking forward to the day when we’re not even having this conversation, we’re just talking about them as qualified people who happen to be women. Hopefully, we’re there someday, but now? Not yet.” I mean, she's not wrong on the last part. We're not there yet. She just fails to realize it's her fault we're not there yet. Sooner you stop making a spectacle of women …
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:36 AM
7

There's zero tolerance for boys to be aggressive, and even being energetic results in them being drugged up as if their energy is a problem. It's natural for boys to have a lot of energy. They need avenues to get it out, not drugs. But nobody cares to help boys, just shove them down and then blame them for everything. No one encourages women to be tepid or submissive. What universe are you living in? We encourage boys and men to be tepid and submissive. "Happy wife, happy life." A woman hits a m…
/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:22 AM
1

You don't understand the legal system at all. First of all an accuser is not "a victim". If you view them as such, you automatically assume guilt of somebody. And guess who that will be, it's not some random across the world. It's the accused in the same court room. Thus goes directly against due process and presumption of innocent. And no, it is not a pipe dream because identities of people are protected within court all the time. Get a grip.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:21 AM
1

Pretty sure men had sex before they ever supported International Women's Day as a thing... because it wasn't there at the dawn of humanity.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:28 PM
13

National Organization for Women is hardly an "extreme example" of feminism. In yet, they oppose default shared custody at every turn. Default custody going to women only exists because a woman demanded it in the first place, and gets blamed on "patriarchy" by feminism. I'd give more examples, but you'll just keep up the no true scotsman routine. Look into it if you want, or don't.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:24 PM
3

People talk about it, but there's really nothing we can do about the 3rd world. It's terrible for everyone there. Nobody talks about realistic solutions to any of the problems there, just that those places are bad because they treat women badly. [nevermind the other half of the population] That's about where it ends. And, I really don't think we can help them. Particularly when we only focus on half the problem. How safe are women going to be if we waved a wand to remove violence against women/g…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:21 PM
2

There's tons of arguments here between subs/regulars. There's definitely people here just to whine about feminism even when it's irrelevant to men's rights. And the mods are useless and would rather defend "mah free speech" and let people post irrelevant nonsense than delete stuff that has nothing to do with men's rights [or stuff that's been reposted 500 times in the last 2 days]. Which technically this post would be I suppose.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:14 PM
5

Because they think the only reason people read books by men is because men wrote them. Or maybe they know better, and are just trying to justify their bigotry, but that's what they claim.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:11 PM
4

Sucks that people don't get why people ask about International Men's Day on this day. Because nobody talks about it when it rolls around. So nobody knows it exists. If companies actually tweeted about it too, and if Google bothered to make doodles for it, then it would be common knowledge and nobody would ask about it. Hell Sonic's twitter literally celebrates things like international walking day. But not international men's day [at least when I tried to find it in twitter's search]. And the "p…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:07 PM
2

It's a lie. I've yet to see any legitimate study prove any of those claims. The only one I've seen is the terrible African study with tons of problems.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:01 PM
1

The accuser doesn't get named. It's literally just a way to give power to vindictive women. You google the person and find out that half a dozen women have accused the applicant of rape. Due to there not being definitive evidence, the person has never been convicted. You going to rent out that half to that person? Doubt it. I wouldn't. Thus proving the point that it's there to destroy a man's character and not about justice. Which is why they shouldn't be named. How you made such an argument not…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:58 PM
8

Stranger still when you consider this is from a gender with ingroup bias. I grew up with two sisters, the middle one is insanely jealous of our older sister. Never happy about her life going well, any compliment would be attached to "I hate you" [ie; "You look so good, I hate you."] I was talking with my older sister a few days ago and she said she doesn't even think that they ever really got along because of this, despite trying. I really don't get why people think women are better at communica…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 06:01 AM
0

I cringed at the the article title and there are even dumber ones in there. Ugh.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:48 AM
20

The pediatric society has long held that its risks – including pain to a small baby, bleeding and the chance of disfigurement of the penis – outweigh its benefits. And death. As well as the hardening of the glands [unavoidable], loss of sensitivity, potential for painful erections if too much skin is removed. Among other problems. The group revisited the issue with a report just last month that addressed growing evidence circumcision helps prevent sexually transmitted disease, acting almost like…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:44 AM
3

Relevant
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:36 AM
5

I'd rather start by helping male rape victims, and to punish proven false accusers [ie; texts that show she's threatening to accuse him of rape if he doesn't do x, or she admits to lying later]. Then see where that leaves us. Rather than undermining due process even further than rape cases already do. Due process is always going to be flawed, but it's the best we can come up with. I've yet to see anyone suggest something better than our current system. Only alternatives seem to be to just throw …
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:25 AM
2

That's what it looks like to me as well.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 04:44 AM
4

Feminists don't advocate equal representation in all men dominated jobs, just the ones that pay well. No they don't. It's well paying jobs that have status and/or are easy. Name the feminists who are pushing for women to be miners, or to be working on oil rigs, or truck drivers. You know, things that risk the lives of mostly men so pay well.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 04:44 AM
1

But they aren't doing that. It's two different issues priced differently, and you can buy either one regardless of gender. Did you even read what I wrote? Of course it's legal to have two different products priced differently and then anyone can buy them.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:02 AM
1

they go on a rant claiming how all women are sluts and whore Nope. That's not an actual nice guy. Actual nice guys are simply confused. They get told "I wish more men were like you!" but then the women show zero interest in them, and choose men who they claim to hate. Because these women aren't honest about what they want. It sounds good to say you want a nice guy, it doesn't sound very good to admit you like someone that treats you like shit. You're conflating things to support your argument, b…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:00 AM
3

I've tried. All I really remember is that at one point Karen Straughan and/or The Honey Badgers shared some of the videos of the channel to help support it since it was new and needed funding and support. But they put out so much stuff it's hard to find it that way.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:51 AM
4

This is pretty fucked up. not sure what the person you're responding to is referring to specifically though.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:27 AM
11

One of the best videos about these types of things. There was a great video about a man who was molested as a child and was afraid to hold his child in fear of him having any of those feelings himself. I wish I could find it. I can't remember what organization posted it. It was years ago now. But they had quite a few great videos.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 07:24 AM
2

Tell me your gender. If it's female, your opinion means shit and you can go away. If it's male, I will accept and listen. Under your reasoning, I am not being sexist/discriminatory because you can tell me either, even if it's not your gender. You. Can. Buy. Either. Magazine. Regardless. Of. Gender. You have no argument. And since you can't grasp simple concepts, and the fact your own argument disproved your own claims earlier, I'm not about to go into economic principles to debunk the pink tax f…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:19 PM
3

Yes, because you can buy either one. Something everyone here should know, but they didn't bother to read the article before being outraged at such an "injustice".
/r/MensRights06/03/18 03:08 PM
2

The pink tax is discrimination too, The pink tax isn't real. lol Since you didn't even bother to read the article let me quote the relevant portion for you. (Readers can of course choose to pay whichever cover price they want.) SUCH DISCRIMINATION Top form /r/mensrights. You're really upvoting the best of the best today. lmao, fucking genius. Can't make this shit up. Bunch of outrage seeking sheep at this time of night/day, I suppose.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 02:55 PM
2

where one is acted upon violently, And to just accept it, because reasons. And you're not normalizing violence at all. Nope. At least you finally used the word violence instead of skirting around it... incapable of hurting you Oh you just did it later and forgot to exclude the word violent, whoops. You're slipping. I'll continue to fight for people's right to defend themselves from people who seek to harm them. And to encourage everyone to not hit anybody, but if you do, expect to be hit back be…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 12:16 PM
-3

So you support the pink tax as valid then. Because women are "paying more" for the "same thing". Even though it's not the same, like this issue. It's basically a more expensive, charity supporting, alternate cover. It's not oppression. It's not discrimination. Your argument is idiotic. You're picking a very stupid hill to die on. "Oh no, two magazines that are the same other than a cover and I can buy either one. I'M SO OPPRESSED BY THIS DISCRIMINATION!" You're not even arguing that it's bullshi…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:34 AM
5

fragile women That's sexist dear. You're not going to fix the social perceptions that favor women by advocating beating the crap out of them, Defending yourself from an attacker is not "beating the crap out" someone. It's defending yourself. Your manipulation of the English language needs work. You're trying, but it's not working to trick me into feeling bad for an attacker of someone. Regardless of gender. I don't care if some stick of a man punches an MMA fighter and gets knocked out anymore t…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:31 AM
3

Thanks, didn't see that I guess. I hate the format of 'articles' on the daily mail.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:28 AM
2

Standing by while someone assaults you and encouraging others to do the same is normalizing violence.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:27 AM
0

And two different prices aimed at men and women are not discrimination? It's two different magazines that you could buy. You can pick one or the other. Regardless of gender. Lay off the victimhood, dear.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:25 AM
-7

Ya'll getting outraged over nothing. It's just two different issues. You're free to buy the cheaper one if you want to. It's not a gender thing at all. The extra proceeds of the more expensive one go to some charity for girls, can't remember which. Yes it's bullshit that they're spouting off an imaginary gap, but it's not discrimination. edit; enjoy being petty today /r/mensrights It's a great look. Feels over reals amirite. It's fine when you do it.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:32 AM
4

Beating up weak people who get out of line isn't going to make society a better place. It's not your job to teach women their place with violence. Yes it will. It's why men do not just waltz up to each other and start wailing away like women do to men. There's a reason women do this, because they know most men won't do anything about it. And they're legitimately surprised when one actually does. If they knew that men weren't going to treat them like children, they'd stop acting like children and…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:18 AM
3

Punching someone in the nose in a certain way to kill them doesn't take that much strength. Being shoved over and hitting your head and dying also doesn't take much strength. lol at comparing grown women with children. Most people don't bother to admit that we treat women like children, but you're flat out admitting it. Lovely. At least you're honest.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:08 AM
3

So, for example, getting punched and then punching someone back is not self-defense. Uh, that's completely wrong. The fuck are you talking about? Did you even read any of those first two links? Because your "descriptions" are completely wrong for them, and none of it backs up this bullshit about not being able to punch someone if they punch you. necessity; In the criminal law of many nations, necessity may be either a possible justification or an exculpation for breaking the law. Defendants seek…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:04 AM
6

I'm confused, did he report it to the police? Or just to TMZ? The article doesn't make it clear. They just say his therapist suggested "reporting" it. And the police say they're not investigating. Why? Did he not go to them in the first place? Or for some other reason?
/r/MensRights06/03/18 09:25 AM
1

I loved Craig Ferguson, but he didn't give a fuck and it showed. So it was a nice change of pace from the others. Stopped watching all late night when he stopped.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:23 PM
1

No, a nice guy who is an actual nice guy. Women need to stop lying about what they want. They always just say things that sound nice to hear. But then when men are what they say they aren't interested in them, they're interested in the complete opposite of what they say they want. It's not about being entitled to someone being attracted to you, it's about the demonstrably false attributes they claim to want in men. And then they get with men who hold none of those things. Proving they actually d…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:20 PM
2

If men and women equally asked each other out, then it would make sense for the person to ask to pay for the date. Given they'd plan what they do too. But, that's not the reality we live in. Men ask the majority of the time, they face all the rejection and are laid with the bills too. I think it's fair to split the bill until you decide if you care enough about a person to keep going out with them and you personally want to pay for it. But it shouldn't be some obligation out of tradition like it…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:14 PM
1

If you have no job as it is, then it's not a threat on your livelihood. Good luck proving you were going to get the role without sleeping with him and he took it away until you had sex. It's Hollywood. Even if it wasn't, it's the hiring process. There's no guarantee that you'd even get the job. The sex is what guaranteed they would above someone who didn't put out.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:05 PM
1

Are the women who chose, with no coercion or force, to trade sex with him scumbags as well? Or are they innocent of their role in giving this man the power to do it to more and more women in the future? And I don't see how he "sowed" false accusations of rape if all he did , by your estimation, was "be a scumbag" who did nothing illegal. If that's the case, then why did he reap being accused of being a rapist and abuser for giving fame/roles in exchange for sex with the women on board for the tr…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 09:02 PM
29

I think people are tired of vapid celebrities acting like they're the moral arbiters of the world. And sick of them feeling they have anything of value to add to complex social and legal issues. This is literally a circle jerk event for what movies are "good" and who did "good" making them. Not a place to talk about social issues.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:50 PM
5

'Progressive' points.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:49 PM
3

Looks like she cut her own hair, looks awful.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:48 PM
2

By that logic men have all the rights too.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:43 PM
5

That's not true. I think the peons like this, actually believe the bullshit they're being sold. They're trained when they're impressionable young adults [and younger now-a-days since this b/s is infecting primary school too]. They can't stand up to scrutiny because they're not set up to. They're trained to repeat the talking points endlessly. That's it. They don't know how to debate. They wouldn't even know how to start, because they don't even really understand their own positions. Which is why…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:39 PM
3

That's not a right. They can never bring up any legal right they don't have, because they have all of them. Unless you want to count being topless, but as far as I know that's not heavily enforced and isn't even illegal everywhere to begin with. Nobody has the right to not be criticized. That's not a thing.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:35 PM
26

I... don't understand what's private about a waiting room? Why would anybody care if someone knows you're getting a breast cancer screening? Why keep it a secret? But the NHS trust involved said the decision to ban men was taken to ‘protect the privacy and dignity of our women patients’. I don't get it. A spokesman for Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust said: ‘To protect the privacy and dignity of our women patients who are not fully dressed, we ask men to wait outside this clini…
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:39 PM
5

The temperature in most office settings is for the computers. Rather than consideration of any person. Which is why men find themselves hot, and women cold. Nobody wins except computers!
/r/MensRights04/03/18 02:29 PM
1

The argument is because they think men having no shelters means there's no men who need them. Which is retarded, but that's not surprising given how gendered the discussion of domestic violence is in society; it's just something men do to women. When in reality, it's something abusers do to victims.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 03:45 AM
2

I fantasized about a substitute teacher in middle school, he was hot as fuck. But, the reality of sex was not something I was prepared for at that time, I know this because I wasn't ready for what I consented to at 17 with a friend and regretted it and it ruined the friendship. I don't even think I was ejaculating from masturbation in middle school yet. I remember it took me a good while to really 'get it'. Sure as fuck wasn't ready for full on sex. Adults should stay away from kids, simple.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 10:34 PM
1

But they were also disappearing together doing who knows what. Yeah, they could have been playing Scrabble. eye roll We know what they were doing.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 10:28 PM
1

No it doesn't.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 11:55 PM
1

Spare me your bullshit. A 14 year old is a fucking idiot who knows nothing about life and certainly not sex. Any adult that wants to have sex with them is a predator. I don't doubt a 14 year old can "consent", but it is not informed consent when doing so with an adult. Adults do however have this experience with life and sex. It's abuse to prey on children, which is what they are doing. Especially as TEACHERS. There are plenty of things that we USED to do throughout history that we no longer do.…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:16 AM
1

I'm mostly on the left I guess, though dislike all the terms since they're divisive and serve no purpose in my mind. Since usually when they're used, it's to dismiss people off hand simply for being in the "other". And this applies to anybody, regardless of affiliation. I'd rather just talk about the issues than where they fall on some arbitrary chart. Let's focus on the issues, not "left vs right". But no. You said something I disagree with so you're "the other", therefore bad. I was surprised …
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:14 AM
3

America has to do the mental gymnastics to try a teenager as an adult for taking nudes of themselves. They're both the victim and perpetrator. They're an underage victim, but being charged as an adult. It makes no logical sense. The law desperately needs updating.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:00 AM
2

Think they're talking about ones like Paglia or Sommers. Who have no books used in gender studies, who were kicked out of the church and are called "anti-feminist" since they spoke out against stuff like this. But yeah, they don't represent feminism at all. Even if they both call themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:56 AM
2

Minnie Driver, iirc, said that it's all the same. Or something to that effect at least. I just laugh. How stupid. It can all be bad, but we can still acknowledge the difference in severity. It's like someone being murdered, vs mugged. It's not the same. They're both bad, but one is clearly more severe.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:49 AM
3

great bot
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:40 AM
2

You could have at least read the two whole comments prior to you posting and saw the OP already acknowledge they chose to do this.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:38 AM
2

I'd imagine most online feminists are on tumblr or some other side. May just be demographics. Also, when you exit here you'll find yourself seeing feminist/SJW nonsense more than not in main subs. So they aren't even really required the space to talk about feminist issues, since everyone already does. Though feminists loooooove to claim that reddit is mostly anti-feminist. That has not been my experience at all.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:37 AM
1

I got approached by a woman to be a model for some magazine, does that count? If yes, then yes [obviously]. If not... umm, not that I remember.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:34 AM
24

All the references of "sex" and "sexual relationship" are gross. She raped him. A 14 or 15 year old can't consent to sex with a 26 year old teacher. The victim reported that Peterson told him they couldn’t tell anyone about their relationship or they’d get in trouble. He also said she bought him marijuana and bowls for smoking it, and his grades suffered after their relationship started. So she groomed him, like the predator she is. Sent him porn [her own nudes], gave him drugs, told him he coul…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:06 AM
5

I never say they didn’t. Well you should, because they don't.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:34 PM
5

"Men have all the rights" - feminists
/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:34 PM
1

Math is a patriarchal tool to oppress women. Or something.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:04 AM
2

Apple's diversity officer "resigned" after she said diversity can be found in a group of white men. Women get fired for "inappropriate" comments, but they just happen to be talking common sense. Which is now "inappropriate". I mean you can claim she wasn't fired, but... I think it's pretty obvious they pushed her out.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:52 AM
1

They aren't anyway. These people are idiots. They constantly bitch about all the men in politics, most of which support them, then they act as though men don't do anything for "social equality" [female benefit].
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:31 AM
1

The parallels between FGM and MGM are vast. Even down to women who have it done who say it feels BETTER, they think it LOOKS better, is cleaner... are you noticing a pattern? Every argument used for MGM is used for FGM. The only difference is the normalcy of MGM here, so we as society defend it while looking down on third world countries with FGM. When in reality, we're no better. And everywhere that FGM exists, MGM also exists. Whereas only MGM is legal and accepted in first world countries.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:15 AM
2

Not sure why they didn't just write a proper article like their disclaimer on the bottom, just more in depth. That would be an article worth reading that didn't make me want to slam my face into a wall.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:06 AM
7

This is so dumb. Did I miss where women would be thrown in prison if they tried to buy the "male" scotch? Why are they gendering scotch? This is so asinine. Yes that was redundant, but fucking hell. “Scotch as a category is seen as particularly intimidating by women,” Or... and hear me out. Women just don't like scotch? No, it's because a lady wasn't on the bottle. You solved it all. Good job. Good use of resources. Why not make it fucking pink too? (Note: This article is satirical. And, accordi…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:02 AM
11

So following the logic, 96% of Australian men don't have sex ever because women totally find it gross and icky. or maybe the people that argue that are wrong
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:50 AM
3

Why would your parent agree to cut your genitals for no reason? it's better that way for me. You don't know that, you have a clear and obvious bias. If we removed finger nails from babies, in 100 or some years nobody would bat at eye at it because it'd be normalized. That's how these things perpetuate. If you used your brain at all, you could come to this conclusion on your own.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:28 PM
1

And can take a loooooong time for you to recover from it too. A house in my neighbourhood [two doors down!] burnt down and it took over a year, maybe more than two, to rebuild it. Not sure how long it took them to get through insurance, but that must be a nightmare too.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:54 AM
1

No. I can support equality without considering myself a feminist. I'd have no issues with feminism if that were the case with it, but I wouldn't call myself one. But it isn't about equality, so meh. As is, I already have no issue with individuals who support equality even if they're naive enough to call themselves feminist. They just have to show me what they're about first before I believe it. Not just lip service, then turning around and speaking nonsense about patriarchy, wage gap and other s…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:23 AM
1

That face is ugly and creepy. But the female faces are creepy too, so par for the course.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:19 AM
1

Such as whether or not fem-bots would cheapen or commoditize human interactions, You clearly didn't read the comments of the article. That's basically 95% of them.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:15 AM
1

Gay men may buy this though. Even if it's "aimed at women". PlayGirl was mostly bought by gay men, not women. I just don't see why women would want this. They are fine with their disembodied penises and phallic objects, and their porn books romance novels. And this doll is most definitely not going to take a similar role to their fantasies. Popular romance novels are not about guys that are polite, and who will welcome his owner home and, in a British accent, talk about their favourite TV show o…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 10:10 AM
1

I have pointed this out to people so many times it's frustrating. Focus on the positive, sure it's easier said than done, but you should be aware of our tendency to inflate the negative and ignore the positive. That's very unhealthy behavior.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:54 AM
1

Yevon, what a selfish asshole. Insurance Commissioner Ralph Hudgens estimated that the act caused more than $1 million in damages. Damn. two dogs and a cat died as a result of the fires What a piece of shit she is. Poor doggies and kitty. :( And the families who loved them.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:52 AM
3

and technically your right about circumcision not causing medical issues. That's flat out false. Skin bridges. How about boys who end up dying due to circumcision every year? How about when the entire penis is cut off? Removing too much skin so erections are painful later in life? Among other issues. There are a lot of problems associated with removing the foreskin, and none of them get talked about. Nor do the benefits of the foreskin get talked about. Because if they were talked about, the iss…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:46 AM
2

Experts can be wrong, and have been before. Just pointing that out, not saying they're wrong or right and don't care to argue about it either way.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:38 AM
6

People are bad at hypotheticals. They never frame it properly, they can't separate their pre-existing self from it and consider they'd be different if things played out different in their lives. Even forgetting a hypothetical, however, just look at the law of averages. And, the attitude that the vast majority of men have toward someone putting a knife near their dick at all. Regardless of purpose. Most men remain intact by choice. And most men do not want anything dangerous near their genitals. …
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:37 AM
5

A baby wouldn't remember if their parents put cigarettes out on them either. Doesn't make it okay. And trauma has affects on development, whether we remember the trauma or not. And if you don't think 'circumcision' isn't traumatic, then you've never watched one performed. Just hearing the boy's screams are traumatic in and of themselves. Let alone what they're doing to him. Ignorance is bliss though. That is why you hold your position.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:31 AM
6

The best looking dick I've ever seen is natural and uncut. And I have researched this subject thoroughly~ But yeah, it's an irrelevant argument even if you assume it to be true. If that's the argument, then that means it's COSMETIC surgery of the genitals... of a baby. Which is so obviously unnecessary and morally reprehensible.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:29 AM
3

There are Jewish people against circumcision so...
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:27 AM
2

You're pretty woke. hehe
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:20 AM
6

But men, as a group, were not universally benefiting from "patriarchy". Most men were just as "oppressed" as women were. That remains true of everywhere that women are seen as oppressed in a real way [not the western world way of having to hear some "mansplaining" on twitter]. Every third world country that treats women like shit, treats the men like shit too.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:43 AM
8

Top post doesn't even have 300 upvotes... I think something wonky is going on there. Top posts entire first page here has over 10k votes and there's way less people, granted they're always [I assume] from hitting all. But how could a sub with millions not have anything hit all by now?
/r/MensRights25/02/18 07:16 AM
1

Kids can't choose either. You think religious parents aren't pressuring their kids to believe exactly what they do? Leave it to adults to decide what they want.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:23 AM
17

the consequences would be much further reaching than many perhaps imagine. It would not suffice simply to forbid circumcision by law. A whole apparatus of state surveillance and interference would be needed to enforce the ban. Social workers would obtain warrants to visit homes and young boys would be taken aside to drop their pants for a genital inspection. Doctors and teachers would face disciplinary action if they failed to report their suspicions. Children believed to be at risk from circumc…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 04:15 AM
1

they don't delete anything
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:49 AM
4

It may be disproportionate, but it's not a wide spread issue. Most boys and men are not mass murderers. So that indicates there's actually nothing wrong with men and boys, or masculinity, as a whole. If there were, we'd see far greater number of boys and men doing it. Women disproportionately kill children, are girls/women broken? Is femininity in need of changing? No, because most women aren't murdering children. It's an individual problem, and we need to look at each individual as a unique sit…
/r/MensRights23/02/18 03:46 AM
3

This is not helicopter parenting at all. It's literally just parenting. Helicopter parenting is your kid stubbing their toe, and the parent freaking out, taking them to the ER and demanding another doctor when they say that their kid is fine. And then when another doctor comes in, and says the same thing, they threaten to sue, and then they go to another hospital's ER and do the same. That is a helicopter parent; obsessive over protection of their precious snowflake from any and all things. Incl…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:34 AM
1

You clearly do not understand the complexities of mental health. Bye.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:41 PM
1

That phrase does not mean, "for no reason other than to spread their suffering."
/r/MensRights20/02/18 09:13 PM
5

Are said "dress shirts" v-necks, and are your pants skintight? Doubt it. "kinda" showing off your physique is drastically different than what women often wear.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:36 PM
1

for no reason other than to spread the suffering they themselves endured. Now that's a presumption, dear.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:17 PM
1

I don't know, why don't more men kill their kids? What about women a makes them feel like they can drown their kids, slit their kids throats, burn them alive in a shed? What a stupid question. Though the last one I think wasn't even her own kids, but she was on the phone with the father while she did it so he could hear their screams.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:15 PM
2

Sucks the comments are disabled, would've given him a comment in support for standing up to the double standard. Even if these shows are utter trash.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:13 PM
1

To be fair, you have no idea who is laughing and who is clapping. But, given human nature... I do not doubt there are a good portion of those laughing who also clapped. I mean, imagine you in the audience. You wouldn't laugh, I presume. But would you then clap after he pointed out the hypocrisy? If you did, that doesn't mean you laughed. Get my point?
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:13 PM
1

Now I'm curious what it was.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:09 PM
3

be a bully. That's an understatement. We make him out to be a monster.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:09 PM
10

Men are already on women's sides, which is then conflated with feminism's side. What world do they live in where women speak about any type of victimization [perceived, provably false - wage gap, or real] and men just don't listen. Men listen too much to women. Men need to listen less and think more. And women need to feel less and think more.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:54 PM
6

"Men have mental illness, too. Yet insert percentage of murdered children are murdered by women. This isn't about mental illness. This is about violent women and their easy access to defenseless children."
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:56 AM
9

They aren't, you can just buy whichever one you want. Go check their twitter about it. They explained you can just buy whatever one you want. Still stupid since it's based on a lie, but who buys magazines? Gotta try whatever you can to drum up business, I guess.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:55 AM
6

You don't have to. You can just buy whichever you want, this isn't some discrimination thing. It's just a stupid gimmick. The extra money for the more expensive one goes to some charity for girls. Can't remember what exactly.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:53 AM
11

An infant has no religion. A baby isn't asking for this. It's being forced on them. Your religious freedom ends as soon as it starts to affect another person. Cut your dick off for your Sky Wizard for all I care, just wait until you're 18 to do so and leave other people alone.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:34 PM
2

Ah yes, I'm sure the number of black market circumcisions will be just as high as legal circumcisions going on every day. Oh wait, no that's stupid.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:32 PM
7

Sweet summer child. You think all that child support payment is for the child's NEEDS? Women [and the few men who get it] aren't even required to prove where the money is being spent. Child Support payments are excessive. They should only support needs, and perhaps mutually agreed upon excesses [like sports, or other extra curricular activities]. But you should definitely have to provide evidence that all the money is going to the child, and not to buying new shoes for yourself.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:27 PM
1

Anal ain't kinky. It's pretty vanilla.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:23 PM
1

Being a bottom doesn't make us more like women, Vice. Not very "progressive" of you. Not that I'm surprised at their hypocrisy and regressive way of thinking. I guess gay men are women if we bottom?
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:21 PM
1

And? Just because it's "quite hard to do", doesn't mean you can just go around saying whatever and never face a consequence at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 08:44 PM
2

Freedom of speech doesn't protect you from libel and slander. What on earth are you talking about? The problem is that nobody is suing.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:47 PM
3

I was never taken to a shrink for playing with Barbies. My grandpa didn't care that I'd play with my sister's toys at his house. Hell, he bought me insane amounts of Trolls which were more a girl toy than a boy toy. Literally the only person that cared was my mother. But even that was limited to "that's for girls!" and not any real action on her part beyond that. So I just snuck into my sisters room and played quietly instead.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:42 PM
16

Feels like it'd be a good vetting process too. Propose with a cheapo ring, she gets pissed. Welp, you know she's shallow and all about money. Cut her loose. Nobody is forcing a man to go pay insane amounts for a stupid ring. If you don't want to, be an adult and don't do it. If she won't marry you because you don't want to spend crazy money on a ring, why would you even want to marry her anymore? That's a huge warning sign. Listen to the universe. If you don't, that's on you. Not women.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:35 PM
11

Is it? My sister years ago bought a dog, and wanted them NOT to cut her tail off. But by the time they arrived to pick up the dog, they had already done it. This was over 10 years ago though.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:23 PM
1

Yeah, and good luck emailing them not to do it.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 04:17 PM
2

It's that way to help fight and prevent infection. Nature is smarter than we are. It's there for a reason, and done this way for a reason. I think this is where the "boys will get infected!" attitude comes from. That people tear the foreskin from the head of the penis, thus creating a wound, which then gets infected. It's ignorance. Why the solution is to create an even larger wound that can get infected even easier is beyond me. Even without knowing about foreskin at all, I don't see how that m…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:32 PM
5

100% of them are mutilated. It's by definition, people just don't like it since they don't want to face reality. "I didn't mutilate my child!", "My parents didn't mutilate me when I was completely defenseless!", "I'm not mutilated! I feel fine!" So they use mental gymnastics. Even had someone go as far as to say it's the same thing as clipping your finger nails. Not removing them entirely, just clipping them. That's how far people go to internally justify that it's not mutilation.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:28 PM
2

This is why I bring it up whenever I possibly can. A lot of people simply don't know it happened at all. The more the info is out there, the better.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:23 PM
1

In yet feminists say that men are the ones who feel entitled to women's bodies and interest. Hmm.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:18 PM
2

Facing rejection sucks. That's why. If women wanted "equality" they'd just approach men and face that rejection. But most still don't on this, because they know rejection sucks. Look at this woman, she's complaining that her "signals" were rejected and blamed it on men. I remember some feminists arguing for "equality" in the whole "who should pay for the date" and then pretending they were even by saying "whoever ASKS is fair!" No it's not, because that's just another way to say "men pay". Until…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:15 PM
2

"manspreading", "manterrupting", etc. We need less language, more common sense.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 02:04 PM
2

Nonsense. When I think of masculinity, it includes things like men who put themselves at risk to save people. Even random men on the street who aren't in the army, who aren't police or fightfighters, just random men. Pushing cars off train tracks, jumping into direct path of a subway to pull someone out of it who fell, diving and flipping around to move a child out of the way of a crashing car, saving animals stuck in sewer grates, stuck in a broken bridge, stuck in a mudslide, dolphins beached.…
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:55 PM
10

Women Can Openly Own Sex Toys Women Can Wear Men's Clothes to Work Women Have Multiple, Viable, Birth Control Options Women Can Openly Experiment With Homosexuality Women Can Openly Touch Each Other [hugs and such] Women Can Dance Together Women Can Call Each Other Atractive Women Can Make Sweeping Denouncements of Men Women Can Wear Makeup Women Can Choose to Have Abortions There ya go.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:41 PM
2

I always wonder how students even get so close to teachers. Especially male students to femalse teachers. It's a predatory woman getting close to a male controlled by hormones and who has yet to mature emotionally. If it were the reverse genders, we'd call it grooming... because it is.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:22 PM
7

So male writers don't magically sell well, don't magically have a big audience, but they still have "prestige" [another word for privilege, I suppose]. I can't imagine being so stupid. If all men are not magically successful at something, where some women are highly successful, then maybe it's not gender at all.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:14 PM
3

Either he is a real piece of shit He is, regardless of these claims. He was disgusted to hear a face cream put on his hand had foreskin used in it, until he heard it was just baby foreskin. Then he was cool with it.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:45 PM
5

Won't stop them from trying, like Amy Schumer. Literally tells a joke about how she had 'bad sex' and the man couldn't keep it up because he was "wasted" and in and out of consciousness. And she wasn't drunk at all. His fingers poked inside me like they had lost their keys in there. And then came the sex, and I use that word very loosely. His penis was so soft, it felt like one of those de-stress things that slips from your hand? Such brave comedy.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:55 AM
2

You forget that some people are stupid as hell.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:42 AM
8

Who cares, didn't stop smarter men from being torn a new asshole for making a joke that nobody but some busy body liar was offended by. Equal application of these retarded "standards" is the only way we're going to see people stand against them. Rather than support them blindly for the womynz sake.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:36 AM
2

Post a picture of a female athlete with the exact same text and wait until someone complains. Then post the side-by-side. Neither of which are this post. Which is my point. It's just saying "buzzfeed can't stop objectifying men" and acting like that is bad in and of itself. Why people are defending this shitpost is beyond me.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 07:29 AM
1

self control, purity of mind, and sexual morality Implying you can't have these when you sexualize another person? I disagree with the notion. I've been in a monogamous relationship for 10 years, and have no issue with self control, purity of mind or sexual morality. But that's not going to stop me from seeing a hot guy and going "wow, he''s fucking hot". That doesn't stop him from being a person. I don't have a neurological disorder. I know it's a person, that's why I'm attracted to him in the …
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:06 PM
-8

Are you serious right now? My point is that your argument should be to point out their hypocrisy. Rather than say, "Objectification is bad, therefore you doing this toward men is bad!" Which is what this post is doing. It's "Buzzfeed just can't stop objectifying men" not "Buzzfeed objectifies men here, and yet they complain about objectification of women there." It's just a single image of them objectifying men and the OP complaining about it. Nothing more. It's not highlighting the double stand…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 11:52 AM
3

"bloody show" - "a show with blood in it" So the same fucking thing, but more wordy? Adjectives are bad m'kay.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:46 AM
2

I'd call the police and nothing more. I'm not putting myself at risk for any stranger. The same as I'd do for a man.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:36 AM
3

He's not even mad about it. This is literally nothing. and even though she said no, he says he has no regrets over sacrificing his organ “I offered her my heart but I had to settle for giving her my kidney. Whatever happens, I’ll never regret giving her the gift of life.”
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:33 AM
7

I think it is important to realize that circumcision does have its uses, such as a treatment of phimosis. It's not the only treatment for phimosis. The problem is that often times doctors don't try anything else and go straight for circumcision as a solution. When there's other things to try. It definitely should be banned as a routine operation on babies, but I think a complete ban on circumcision is unwise. I think adults should be able to do whatever they want, as long as properly informed. U…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:28 AM
3

It's quite sad that NEITHER really delve into the RISKS. You know, like death, accidentally cutting off the entire penis, skin bridges, removing too much skin which will cause erections to be painful, among other issues. And all no matter if it's perfect, you lose 20k nerve endings, your glans will harden and dry with time, and your shaft is scarred forever.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:25 AM
7

There was a woman who was on People's Court who was on tape cutting up her arm with a massive piece of wood and hurting herself so she could accuse him of attacking her when the police, that he called, arrived. She used the same wood to damage her former boyfriend's [plaintiff] car which he was suing over. Some people are just absolutely crazy. And our system lets them get away with this type of thing. The man in the People's Court episode told the judge that the police didn't do anything and th…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:19 AM
9

I think that's it's entirely irrelevant whether it's a "legitimate perspective" or not. People are entitled to believe what they want to believe. Even if it's nonsense, like feminism. If you disagree with their perspective, then you should be able to argue against it. Rather than simply try to shut down that perspective by demonizing them [racist, sexist, homophobic, etc]. The problem is that a lot of people don't even understand their own position, let alone other perspectives. So they can't de…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:13 AM
2

Life comes at you fast.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:09 AM
15

It's not objectification to find somebody attractive. Stop. Point out the double standard, but don't adopt the same arguments they use. Do you really want to live in a world where it's bad to acknowledge that somebody is attractive? I'd rather not live in such a puritanical world, thanks. And the dude on the left is hot as fuck so.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 08:03 AM
1

Does feeling uncomfortable equate to some huge 'dehumanization' of yourself? Should we encourage the idea that is how you should feel byd emonizing the way we do for women who face this? I don't think so. I understand a person being uncomfortable, and speaking out against it happening to them. But, I think we should leave it up to individuals to state how they feel about it. Rather than universally say "it's wrong!" I think it's fairly natural to find other people attractive, and is a little odd…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 07:54 AM
1

Clearly you don't see many sports. There are quite a few, swimmers for example, where you can see the entire outline of their penis.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 07:51 AM
1

There's a huge difference between working at McDonald's and somebody taking a picture of your dick and people using footage from the Olympics, a worldwide broadcast event, to talk about your junk that happens to appear there. It's disingenuous to act like it's the same thing. And being improper or impolite doesn't mean it's oppression or some massive problem to pull out your fainting couch over.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 07:45 AM
1

If you think the way men were portrayed, and cast, in the new Baywatch movie wasn't to titilate gay men and women then you're naive. And, shocker, women like women's bodies too. Yes, even the straight ones. Which is why you see "objectification" [sexualization] of women all the time in women's magazines. And Sex and the City had more female nudity than male nudity.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 07:43 AM
0

and that's not right. Sexualization is fine. Somebody finding you attractive is not a problem. But objectifying men is equally as wrong. In that it's not wrong at all, you're right. Why can't they just have pictures of them winning? Because people find attractive people attractive.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 07:41 AM
1

We do not speak on such things. It does not support the narrative.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 07:38 AM
2

That's why I'm not a fan of the term "financial abortion". Women can also put the child up for adoption, sometimes she can do so without the father's permission! And she can regret taking on the child and thanks to safe haven laws she can just go dump the baby at a firestation and face no consequence and no longer be responsible. It's all very one sided. And usually people just say for men to "keep it in their pants" if they don't want to be a father. Imagine if we told women to keep their legs …
/r/MensRights12/02/18 07:34 AM
11

Terrible.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:36 PM
3

Rantzerker 55, which I'm watching right now something Karen talks about is fairly fitting here. [1:35:20 ish] "I will question, I will actually fearlessly question things like; was women's suffrage a good idea? I want to know, I want to know. And therefore I want to look into that, and I want to consider the question. That doesn't mean that by asking the question my apriority assumption is, "Yes it was a bad idea" or "no it was a good idea". It' s just that any question like that should be worth…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:24 PM
2

Perhaps you are just imagining what you want to be imagining. Projection.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:12 PM
1

the police have no way of knowing who the phone belongs to oh? unless they get that information from the network the phone is connected to. k.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:36 AM
1

The quote you chose does not support your representation of her position. This is a fact. I'm basing everything off what you gave prior to your complete misrepresentation. And I can't help but notice you did not show me where she said in the quote that "men shouldn't be liberated". Because she didn't. You clearly have an axe to grind. I've disagreed with Karen before, and will in the future as well. But I do so for valid reasons, and have actual arguments that are not from misrepresentations of …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:16 AM
-1

A lot of the forms of FGM are less severe than MGM. And the most common are not more severe than MGM at all. Hell one form of FGM is a simple prick. And that's "undeniably far worse" than removal of healthy foreskin and loss of sexual function? Mmm.... okay. So you're incorrect. Just because people say what you do all the time, people believe it. The same reason that people believe women are oppressed [everywhere women are oppressed, the men are too]. Men have all the rights. Wage gap. And a lot…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:05 AM
1

It should be something about "My Body My Choice". While the man toils away in a mine to pay his child support payments, but I don't see how you could do that accurately in a simple graphic style like this.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:04 AM
1

I assumed it was just three different images merged into one.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:03 AM
3

When they used vague "prison worker" I knew it would be a woman. female prison worker And sure enough. What a joke. $65k is an insult for the violation and utter abuse of power.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:01 AM
1

If it's "consensual" with a guard, or anyone working there, then that's not a thing. You can say yes all you want, but a GUARD [or other employees] holds so much power over a PRISONER that it's too stupid to pretend that proper consent is possible. Could it be? Yeah, but too bad. Guards/whatever shouldn't be having sex with prisoners. Period.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:01 AM
1

His abs aren't even that good. :/ He's hot, but come on. Calm the fuck down. And it is labeled as "News" too. Shameful.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:58 AM
0

Well if men could do this, then I think a lot of women would actually choose an abortion. At least the ones who "accidentally" [on purpose] go off the pill, and try to save a relationship with a baby, or try to "tame" a known "bad boy" by having a baby with him. If he just goes "nope" and she's stuck with a looming responsibility without him even pretending to be okay with it, and no government to force him to be there via a paycheck at a minimum.. maybe she'd make a better choice. And if these …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:55 AM
1

Just that a man can wave his rights, and obligations, toward a baby. Just as women can, both after birth and prior via abortion. So he actually has the right to choose when he becomes a parent, and take on the responsibilities. Rather than be treated like a wallet.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:53 AM
1

Karen arguing that men shouldn't be liberated because "everything will fall apart" I stopped here. The quote you chose does not support that point. She did not argue that men shouldn't be liberated. "There's a reason why people are freaking out at the idea of men being liberated, and part of it is, that once you've liberated everybody, who's gonna actually contribute to society? If EVERYBODY in society is a free agent -- and they don't owe anything to society but themselves -- you're not left wi…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:48 AM
2

It's not alt-right, it's just immature and makes you look stupid to use.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:45 AM
2

I just think the more anonymous It's a cell phone, how the fuck is it anonymous? You think police don't know who the phone belongs to? Pfft.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:31 AM
0

I don't know, do you really think that people should be able to call with some b.s. to the local police station so easily? Are you against the emergency line too? where you can't really contact the police that easily then you should be worrying about self-defence or getting yourself out of danger first. This would allow them to contact the police. Part of self-defense is ensuring that someone is coming to help... like the police.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:30 AM
1

That and this seems more suitable for doing in your pocket, thus discretely. I see no issue with the feature.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:29 AM
2

I think most people see this as the immature bullshit that it is.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:25 AM
1

You're using it in an argument to prove your point so. Bye now.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:42 AM
1

Somehow, I never needed people to tell me that porn wasn't real. Maybe just don't raise a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:50 PM
0

Or... OOOOOORRRR, they lived in a much less open society about sex so it wasn't talked about.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:48 PM
1

I can't believe those quotes, geez. Even so, she told me, during sex with these significantly younger nice men, she repeatedly encounters porn memes: facials, “jackhammering” intercourse, more frequent requests for anal sex and men who seem less focused on female orgasms So........men? The fuck does porn have to do with some men being bad, by her summation at least, at sex? I wouldn't want men cumming on my face either, and find it gross in porn, because it's hotter to swallow cum. If it's going…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 02:42 PM
1

Pointing out this behavior is stupid is not "being a victim".
/r/MensRights09/02/18 11:25 AM
2

Its based on the notion that rejecting someone's advances is often an awkward situation. So women can't be expected to handle an awkward situation? there's an undesirable girl hittin That's not switching the genders of THIS story. That's making up your own story. This was her boyfriend. And there's no indication that he "wouldn't leave her alone" in the story either. Stopped reading after that, but I'm sure it's more fantasy. The reverse would be a girlfriend hitting on her boyfriend and some du…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 11:21 AM
1

Yeah, acting like women are completely incapable of handling themselves is the "decent thing" to do... oh wait, it's sexist. Not just for viewing her as incapable of dealing with someone gasp asking her out, but because it's assuming he's a danger to her because penis. Equal opportunity sexism is now the "decent thing" I guess.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 11:18 AM
7

We don't have to imagine it, they complain about photoshop constantly and pretend it's never used on male models/celebs/whatever, even though that's demonstrably false. Hell they complained about an app that removes makeup from pictures.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 11:11 AM
3

They literally said they hope, so I don't see why you said this. He didn't say anything to lead you to believe he has faith it'll happen. Hope and faith are different things.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 11:08 AM
2

What's good for the goose and all that.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 11:04 AM
3

It is not harmless if "done right". Even with the best case scenario, IT'S TEARING THE FORESKIN FROM THE HEAD OF THE PENIS. That in and of itself is not "harmless". And that's just the beginning. Then they cut off the foreskin while the BABY boy screams the most traumatic sounds you'll ever hear. Go watch one and tell me it's "harmless". The only way they "sleep through it" is if they go into shock and pass out. Totally harmless to have babies go into shock from the pain and pass out. Nevermind …
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:32 AM
2

I never said oral contracts aren't enforced. Learn to read. When one party gets something and the other doesn't, that's not an enforceable contract. Contracts are where both parties involved benefit in some way. Like agreeing to pay somebody who will fix your car. That's an enforceable contract, even verbally. Though verbal contracts are worth as much as the paper they're written on. That's just a promise. And you can break those all you want. Somebody can't use the legal system to enforce a pro…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:19 PM
3

Back in my day shakes cane we called that "being an asshole". Like the asshole women who have their bags on the seat and don't move them. But society has forgotten that sometimes people are just assholes.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:48 PM
7

You can't enforce that kind of "promise" it's one sided. What does he get out of it? Nothing. So it's not a proper contract. It'd be like saying "I'll buy you a car", and then you don't buy them a car. They can't then sue you for a car because you didn't buy them one. Well they can try, but they will fail. The only way she'd have a case is if she detrimentally relied on the promise. ie; He won, he told her about it and told her they'd share it as they previously discussed. Then she buys a new ca…
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:42 PM
4

I fail to see how these pictures make them "participants" and "not objects". I guess the only factor is that women did it this time. Yay, double standar... I mean, equality.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:37 PM
1

Can't stand him, so I think this is amusing.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:15 PM
0

Did he say women don't have to take responsibility anywhere? If the answer is "no" then there's nothing to discuss. Men are individuals. Individuals that you agree need to take responsibility. At least I assume that's why you picked that quote. Despite it contradicting your title. So...
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:08 PM
17

I don't know whether it's "most" or not, but women do in fact argue in favor of their own mutilation where it happens. They think it's cleaner, looks better, feels better. All the same things that men in the first world say, they say as well. And they also look forward to doing it to their daughters. I know myself I enjoy having been circumcised And I don't. I've accepted it, but that doesn't make it okay. And I wish men would stop saying this at all, as if it's relevant. Would you choose to do …
/r/MensRights08/02/18 12:58 PM
1

Oh goodie, anecdotal evidence.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 07:36 PM
16

They don't understand what privileges they have. If it's one thing they get "right" it's that those with privileges rarely recognize they have them. Only they think it's men who don't recognize them. Here's an example. Cammie Dunaway. Some may know her from E3s of old [Nintendo]. 12:35 to skip through the blathering nonsense to get to her talking about her own male mentors. Though there's quite a few "gems" if you want to get your blood boiling. Anyway, mentors. The most telling quote... "Once w…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 01:27 PM
3

It can make some people worse when it's applied terribly, I tried to find some examples but there are too many ironic ones floating around that I gave up. But yeah, that's the entire point of makeup.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:38 PM
3

An exclamation point usually helps. At least from my experience. Of course they do. It's not fair to punish women for the guilt that all men posses from birth!
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:30 PM
6

Although shaming victims for their clothing happens too. By who? How often? And who supports these people? It's a complete strawman to justify their argument that police "don't help" women since they... you know, bother to INVESTIGATE THE CLAIMS. Which requires knowledge, like what they were wearing so if applicable they can see them on security cameras, find witnesses and so on. I do not believe this is a legitimate barrier to any female victim getting assistance from police, or sympathy/empath…
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:25 PM
5

Only 2.6 percent of construction workers are female. We did not install this glass ceiling, and it is not our responsibility to demolish it. Nobody installed a glass ceiling. It's not glass, it's invisible. Nobody is stopping you from trying to do it. Why are you not a construction worker? I'm sure the answer is "I have no interest". There was a woman on some news segment complaining about this kind of thing, only about STEM, and there was a man on there who was trying to put forth a rational ar…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 09:09 AM
4

One of the reasons corporations are pushing feminism so hard is that it's a cash cow Is it? I think just "helping women" is a cash cow. Not when directly referred to as "feminism". There's a reason most people don't call themselves feminists. Women included. But there is a reason that most people buy into feminist talking points like the wag gap anyway. Because they care about women... and ironically, are comfortable with viewing women as victims. The idea that women are not victims is too much …
/r/MensRights06/02/18 09:03 AM
3

Both were interchangeable all my life, until this SJW crap. I fail to see a good reason for a distinction when people still interchange them more often than not. It was always a more 'PC' way to say "sex", so you wouldn't have to say "sex". Particularly when the only reason they make a distinction is so they can use "gender" interchangeably with personality. So stupid things like "genderqueer" and "gender fluid" can exist in their minds. if you want to discuss personality, do so. Not make up shi…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 08:45 AM
12

My son will have his cut as well, do you know how hard it is to get a kid to brush their teeth for 2 mins, now imagine explaining and going through proper care of the foreskin, and having them do it. You don't even have to do anything until it detaches from the head of the penis on it's own. It otherwise is fused to it and it fights off infection on it's own. People pulling it back to clean their infant sons is why they get infected, because it tears the foreskin from the head of the penis, crea…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 06:28 AM
17

"girl" was any child as well. And "boy" was in reference to a slave or servant. It's why you can see some media you'll see rich people call over a waiter with "boy". It's a remnant of that. Interesting that male children were eventually regulated to a term used for slaves and servants, and female children were left with being human children. If language has the importance feminists say it does, then they are severely missing the boat on the most important bits. Nevermind just being wrong about m…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 06:16 AM
1

Cheerleading has it's own competitions though. Grid Girls don't. I can see Cheerleaders for other sports losing spots now, but entirely? Not so much given they do have things outside of just "rooting for men in sports". Either way, I think it's time for these people to... you know, talk to the women in the jobs before they get them all fired for no reason. Quite a few Grid Girls aren't happy they're losing a job they enjoy.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:52 AM
3

Mm, so tell me, if you swapped out the father/daughter for two highschool kids, would the resulting event look pretty damn similar to a prom, or not? What a moronic argument. By that same logic... When a parent bathes their child; What if you swapped out the parent/child with two highschool kids, would it be "creepy" then? Herp derp. "Well if you change it completely to something else then it's bad!" That's not what this is. Stop being absurd.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:46 AM
1

More women oppose abortion than men do. The issue is very much a women's one, because women can't agree on what they want. Almost like they aren't a hivemind or something.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:37 AM
1

Being caught out lying that she was paid less than a man when he was booked and she just showed up randomly at the club a few months later was the icing on the cake. Guest Spot makes me laugh. The worst part about the whole thing, is that she didn't even really apologize about her lies. She just basically apologized that she was specific enough that she could be proven a liar. "Sorry I got caught!"
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:35 AM
1

I've been wearing the same underwear for months. [none]
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:22 AM
7

There are also a lot of circumcised women out there who aren't screaming pain and torture off the rooftops or "some shit". Some women are even happy that it has been done. How do you feel now? And this isn't simply a gender reversal, this is true. There are indeed women who are happy about their FGM. That look forward to mutilating their daughters as well. Who do not think they are victims or that it's "an issue". That it "feels better", "looks better", "is cleaner" and so on. All the same argum…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:15 AM
3

Siri already gets pissy if you curse at her. It's stupid.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 07:11 AM
1

I stopped reading at "misandry". A word that isn't in my comment or argument. I'm unsurprised that you continue to talk about completely irrelevant subject matter. You're not worth talking to. You can have this conversation with the voices in your head without me.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 05:48 AM
0

Biology is irrelevant. The point was that if you switched the subjects to be about racial groups, then it'd be seen as racist. That's it. You are overthinking it, and you have only further proven that with your reply to me. So say you're not all you want, you've already shown otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 08:57 AM
2

It's to point out how this is discriminatory, not for an actual business plan. You're overthinking it.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:21 AM
3

Tons of people online get death threats, there are even meme threats, report it to the police, and move on. If you make a fuss, more people will do it to troll you. That's how the internet works. Is it okay? No,but you can't stop trolls by giving them attention by crying about it. You can however, scare the fuck out of them when the police track them down and knock on their door for doing the stupid shit they do.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:19 AM
3

History was pretty bad for everybody. Nobody had choices, aside from perhaps the wealthy elite. I always use the hypothetical of traveling back in time and "liberating" all the women and "oppressing" all the men by switching their roles around. Force the men to stay at home and raise the kids, do the housework. While the women go into the fields, into the mines, and get drafted into wars. Nobody would be okay with that. The men then would think you're trying to oppress the women, not them. And t…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:13 AM
3

No it isn't. There's a difference between having a platform, and teaching your bullshit to impressionable children. And college students are still children, which is why this brainwashing works so easily. They haven't lived in the real world. I used to think stupid shit around that age too and buy into some pretty stupid ideas from the SJW camp, despite not even being feminist, and I was smarter than most people my age. It's because we have no life experience to frame it to. And, more importantl…
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:07 AM
1

He's also the only one of them that hasn't somewhat backtracked and tried to make a less abrasive argument about it. Dude you're talking to has only doubled down. It's amusing.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 10:39 AM
8

They still refer to her as an alleged victim which is highly frustrating. She's a liar, not an alleged victim. And she has permanent anonymity? Ugh. THIS IS WHY WOMEN DO THIS, BECAUSE THERE ARE ZERO CONSEQUENCES FOR THEM IN DOING SO. They just walk free and the man's life is in ruins. The legal system is allowed to be weaponized by vicious people like this awful woman.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 10:13 AM
7

Women have been doing this long before 3rd wave feminism.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 10:05 AM
8

She had already been the subject of several complaints and had been reprimanded over her conduct with other male students. So another victim that could have been avoided if we actually acknowledged that women can victimize others. Awful.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 10:01 AM
7

Which is child abuse, children need check ups. And thus you can call child services. Your argument is basically "but bad stuff can happen anyway, so let's do nothing at all."
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:47 PM
1

Pretty stupid, a judge/jury is supposed to determine relevance.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:23 PM
3

I support those who support equality, like CH Sommers, Erin Pizzey, Warren Ferrel... regardless of what they choose to identify as. Sommers still clings to the movement despite them ousting her, Pizzey never was a part of it and was mistreated by feminists and threatened by them, Ferrel was kicked out for talking about men's issues. So no thanks. I don't need feminism to support equality. Nobody does. Pizzey is one of the best people that has ever tried to help people overcome domestic abuse and…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:15 PM
2

Because people say that all the time, same thing with being homophobic and misogynist. When anything obviously hateful gets downvoted into oblivion here. Repeat things enough and it becomes "true" and nothing else matters. Even evidence to the contrary. People will still act like MRAs are "petty losers who boycotted Mad Max" even though that was Return of Kings, which is a site that doesn't like the MRM and has [last I looked] multiple articles against it there. And in it's site descritpion/abou…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:08 PM
2

Should she be applauded for her efforts? Yes. I don't think so. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Just "doing something good" [at face value] isn't enough to get applause. Especially since she's clearly not equipped for parenthood... or life for that matter. Definitely not the brightest crayon in the box.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:57 AM
9

We should also remove breasts at birth for breast cancer. I mean, you could get it. So better to have babies undo surgery to prevent something maybe happening later. /s
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:53 AM
13

homeless, immunodeficient, and elderly men So we mutilate babies on the off chance they become homeless for a time? Do we mutilate girls too? The same "benefits" are claimed in third world for doing that. reduce the chances of stds, with minimal risks and trauma. There's zero evidence of the STD claim. And please don't cite that bullshit African study where the cut men were given condoms upon return visits and the study was conducted during the time they were unable to have sex. Trauma is unexpl…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:49 AM
1

Literally in the same song Although my heart is falling too "objectification" is not a real thing. It's sexualization/attraction. Nothing else. If you look at a HUMAN BEING and think "object" you have severe brain damage or a severe mental disability. We humanize the inanimate just for having "faces". We see the humanity in the unliving all the fucking time, but we can not recognize what a real person is when we see it? Fucking please. That's not a thing at all. It's subconscious recognition. No…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:34 AM
1

You can't do something for fame then complain about it later. You got something out of it too, that was your choice. You weren't "forced" anymore than a woman is "forced" to sign a prenup. "But he wouldn't marry me if I didn't, mah duress" [sadly that works as an argument]. Time to treat women like adults. Now if it's a "If you don't do x then you'll never work in this town/business!" type of thing, that's totally different. But if it's just to get ahead of the pack of other women vying for the …
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:30 AM
1

Have them listen to his songs and voice and that'll probably change their perception of him. Attraction isn't always just physical. A large reason women like him is because his writing and vocals which make him more attractive.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:25 AM
2

If your body isn't "perfect" then it is romantic as fuck if somebody still says they love it. Which is probably why people love the song, because they imagine somebody dedicating it to them when their own body has flaws. He didn't say "I love your thin body" or "I love your fit body". Just "body". And the song is called "Shape of You" ffs, there are multiple shapes people. And the line, "Although my heart is falling too" is in the song. Pointless whining.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:21 AM
1

I already acknowledged Buzzfeed is trash, but it counters your terrible argument that "no one" makes a big deal out of nothing except MRAs who "whine about it". As do my other examples. don't matter when the vocal idiots in your movement are literally advocating for the legalization of rape There's not even a vocal minority who do that, because I've never seen a single person in the MRM say such things. But keep listening and believing second hand reports of what MRAs say and do. Those evil mons…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:01 AM
1

So you're just dense then. Ok.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:55 AM
1

They won't, they don't care about the quality of the sub going down the toilet. It's more important that they not "censor" completely off topic bullshit and trash posts because mah freedom of speech or something. We just have to accept it or leave.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:00 PM
1

Hell, there are people who are KNOWN to fish for upvotes with posts like this. They know what hits and where to post to get the most upvotes. Didn't check this OP, but often times you'll see the exact same post on their profile in other subs, and all their other posts are submissions like it all over reddit. It's like people don't know how reddit works or how people use it. People should ignore the stupid votes entirely they're useless.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:50 PM
1

Yeah, equality is treating everyone differently and only calling women a certain 'bad' name so it's gendered. That makes sense. If "bitch" is sexist, so is "dick". But neither are. They're just mild insults.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:46 PM
1

Clearly you're new to reddit. This is a flaw in the 'upvote'/'downvote' system. Easy to consume content is at the top of EVER.SINGLE.SUB.EVER. That's just reddit. Expecting more from this site is like expecting to get a well written novel from twitter. Frankly why anyone uses any upvoted content to judge any sub is beyond me. People who don't even come here can just up/down vote whatever they want. For any reason. Plenty of people don't vote at all. It's so dumb.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:44 PM
1

To be fair, the most likely solution is to include women. Then people will see how fucked it is and at that point you can't just be like "Well let's remove women, because that's awful!" without it being a bit too noticeable. Otherwise, I don't see how it's going to go away. Expecting people to just start caring about men and get rid of it for "the good of humanity" seems impossible to me at this point. I wish that could happen, but eh. The draft is only necessary if the public isn't on board wit…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:35 PM
1

Now I know you won't read my other comment and are disingenuous. Lovely waste of time that was. Oh well, it was expected.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:26 PM
1

You can't work "with" feminists if you do not subscribe to patriarchy theory, if you recognize the "wage gap" is a myth and it's just an earnings gap due to personal choice [something that feminists; if they acknowledge at all, will then try to turn around on "gender norms" and blame on patriarchy] and "toxic masculinity" and other buzzwords they toss around. If you bring up any point outside that, they will simply accuse you of being a misogynist, racist, homophobe, etc. and try to shut you dow…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:24 PM
0

Only because of people like you who keep harping on it being "sexist". Meanwhile in reality, everybody just says it to everybody. Because it's genderless. That's equality. Treating everybody the same.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:50 PM
1

So gay men are just happy men? Language evolves.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:49 PM
1

Bitching is genderless. As is bitch. The only people that keep it gendered these days are the people who want to be offended about it. People call everybody bitches and say that everyone is bitching. It has nothing to do with women. It's just a watered down curse word. Get over it. Hell, even something like "cunt" is only offensive in some parts of the world. And it shouldn't be there at all, since where it's not offensive it's applied to everybody too. Once again, the people keeping it "gendere…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:46 PM
2

I agree. Sadly the mods don't care about off topic posts at all. mah censorship or whatever
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:43 PM
1

Except news organizations actually report on it as a problem, useless Buzzfeed has done 'experiments' on it [but who cares they're Buzzfeed], some places have actually made it an 'issue' by making it a fineable offense. Yeah, most people don't give a shit, it's petty nonsense. But that doesn't stop some people from making it a bigger issue than it is... which is why the term 'manspreading' was coined in the first place. To make it a bigger issue of how men just do all the bad things ever. Ever h…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:31 PM
1

Manspreading isn't a thing. It's just being a dick. Which women are too by shoving all their bags everywhere. Playing into the game by using their bullshit sexist terms isn't going to remove assholes from the world. So it's better not to play the stupid game for stupid prizes.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:21 PM
1

I wouldn't say this is "real feminism". Feminism in the western world is real feminism. Racist, violent, hateful from the beginning. It's just more petty now. That's the only real difference. From what I'm aware of, they weren't whining about anything as retarded as "manspreading" or "manterupting" and that bullshit. This woman is just doing good. Doing good =/= feminism. Feminism doesn't have exclusive access to human rights issues.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:20 PM
1

Hope they don't apologize. Though these awards are garbage regardless, so I don't know why anybody gives a fuck to begin with.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 12:17 PM
3

Yes, because we all must mindlessly agree with every woman or else we are "silencing" them. Let Sarah Palin get a word in, I'm sure they won't silence her. Or some anti-feminists ladies get a word in... Nah, they don't count. Nobody is obligated to listen. Which is why you get to walk passed the crazed old man talking about the government hiding the second sun on the street, rather than be forced to stop and listen to him. We have our own lives to live. Why should we stop what we're doing to foc…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 11:58 AM
1

Men can't be raped silly. And since some people are really bad at it, obligatory; "/s"
/r/MensRights30/01/18 09:21 AM
7

If you don't get the desired outcome on a gamble, then tough. It's like men with paying for dates. The hope is that she'll have sex with him. If he doesn't get it, he's not entitled to a refund. It's not now fraud. But under similar logic to this, it would be. If the determining factor of your "rape"/"sexual assault" is "does he like me afterward?" or something similar, like "did he return my calls?" Then you aren't a victim. Things just didn't work out. Move. On. We truly live in a culture of v…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 09:18 AM
3

Women as a whole aren't silenced. Unless you count women that feminism silences; like women who don't support abortion. You know the only reason it's still a "hot topic" at all. Women. Not men. Women don't agree, so it's an issue. Men are stuck in the middle trying to appease a divided gender. If women agreed, men would "fix it". Even then, men still don't oppose it as much as women do. People hang on their every word far, far, far more often than not. Which is why saying stupid things is met wi…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 09:10 AM
2

To these people silenced means, "people that disagree with me exist."
/r/MensRights30/01/18 09:00 AM
2

Most of the actually hurtful shit talking that I have experienced in my life has been at the hands of women. The only truly hateful thing directed right at me came from a woman. She knew it would crush me, and I could see the satisfaction in her eyes when she uttered the words. Vile human being. I'd rather be punched in the face.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:58 AM
2

It's ugly as shit, whatever it is.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:53 AM
4

The amount of female feminists who are on national television or some other massive platform talking about how women have no voice is staggering. The lack of self awareness never ceases to make me facepalm.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:52 AM
2

Duh? It goes without saying. The vast majority of people already agree on this, so why talk about it? Nobody thinks people should get rape/death threats for stupid shit they say, except trolls. Or actual psychopaths/sociopaths. About as pointless as saying, "I'm against murder". Or "I'm against torturing children for fun." Yeah, no shit. Saying it makes you sound insane, because general society is already on the same page. So why feel the need to single it out to show you disapprove? Trolls will…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:44 AM
10

The point, which you seem to have missed, is that the gender of those affected by homelessness is completely irrelevant. If we want to help the homeless, then let's just do that. I understand why the MRM talks about it, since there's erasure of men's issues constantly. And this is an example of how men's problems are undermined so we can focus on women instead. "Meteor hits Earth, women most affected". But this is just pointless.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:36 AM
1

At least you recognize the problem with your thinking. I mean, imagine if someone were to say "As a male, I can tell you how awful men are. They're a huge subsection of men who specifically go after passed out women." That'd be a new level of stupid indeed. Congratulations on your ability to grow and recognize the stupidity of such thinking.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 04:06 AM
1

Me thinks you're looking at too much gay porn with fake ass titles. Sorry to burst your fantasies. That guy deep throating and swallowing is not their straight brother-in-law. That guy taking a 8+ cock up the ass without a whimper is not the straight neighbor. It's all lies.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:43 AM
2

There's a reason straight men prefer to strip for gay men than straight women. Clubs won't do shit to protect men from handsy women. Gay clubs will, because men are used to having consequences and expected to have responsibly for their actions. Women, are not. You tell women to stop screaming like a tween girl and grabbing men, then you're telling her to stop spending money there. And she'll be shocked and offended. There was a bar that had the male employees in kilts that had to change what the…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:35 AM
5

But he's hot! But nobody ever sexualizes male politicians!
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:23 AM
2

As a gay man... (He was willing to sell the gay couple an off the shelf cake, but not one specially designed with gay symbols and rainbows). I see nothing wrong with that personally. He isn't refusing to serve them, just not willing to produce a specific type of customized cake. Should he be forced to make a Nazi cake or something? or forced to make one with bloodied vaginas on it? Though rainbows aren't inherently gay. So maybe that part in and of itself wouldn't be worth throwing a fuss about.…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:19 AM
1

I know both and have never listened to a Drake song.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:04 AM
7

"Hello, lovely gentlemen"... I would love this. 3rd panel, what is the context? Is this someone iyou know? A stranger, if the latter... how would they know it's your job if they don't know you? So why would you assume they should know? Lots of people don't fix their own computers. If they do know you, friends? What's the relationship? Why are you friends with this person if you don't like them, and if they know nothing about it? 4... this is probably how talent agencies, or model scammers do it …
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:00 AM
8

Given how ill defined it is, this would be a disaster. Literally disagreeing, even politely, is misogyny if it's toward a woman. Since the only reason you could ever not agree with a woman is because you hate all women. The word has literally no meaning anymore. It's just a random insult like "fucktard" or something.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:55 AM
11

Women are wonderful after all.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:53 AM
3

"If men had periods sanitary products would be free" Which is why toilet paper is free. Oh right. As the book says, "Everybody poops". "If men got pregnant abortion would be legal" It's women who oppose abortion more. And women vote more. So male politicians (that women vote for) are trying to appeal to their voters. Women. Women can't agree on the subject, so it's still contested. If women would make up their minds, then there'd be no more debate. But unfortunately for feminists, women are not …
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:48 AM
1

That the ad campaigns and research efforts to reduce the deadliness and negative impacts of a deadly disease are somehow "too much" compared to others. No. And your "implied" nonsense is just that, nonsense. If it's implied, then it's often just your own interpretation based on your own biases. As we see here. It's literally just saying, "We focus so much on breast cancer, butthere's another deadly cancer that gets a fraction of the focus and it affects equal to more people." It's to make people…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:46 AM
1

Feminism is a political ideology, working with patriarchy theory as it's foundation. Almost every issue wraps back around to "the patriarchy". I'm egalitarian.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 08:05 AM
1

Twitter is run by short sighted fools apparently. This was a foreseeable disaster waiting to happen, but nobody working there is smart enough to see something so obvious.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 07:54 AM
1

Men saving women. How progressive! /s
/r/MensRights26/11/17 07:42 AM
1

Who cares what they claim? They claim a lot of stupid things. Doesn't mean we should care. Sometimes playing the Devil's Advocate is just playing an idiot.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 07:41 AM
1

It very much is when they actively remove it from "offensive" accounts. You can't selectively apply it to what you agree with, and still claim it's impartial. It's like that idiot hosting site that claimed it was neutral to defend themselves for having copyrighted materials being hosted through them. And then they removed some Nazi site and opened up a can of worms, because they suddenly weren't acting as a neutral party. As soon as you start selectively removing access, you are saying something…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 07:36 AM
17

Needs more Erin Pizzey. Stellar human being.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 07:12 AM
1

Because people never work with the same producers in future projects and want to keep those ties to make future projects easier to get off the ground. Being rich is irrelevant. You remain rich by being selective in your standards. Politicians do it all the time. "Famous" people do it too.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:41 AM
1

She's done nothing to prove she's changed at all. Talk to me when there's evidence. And her defending a producer on her show, thus her livelihood, is not evidence that she's now magically a better person. Takes more than that to show a person has changed.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 04:00 PM
4

So their 'logic' is that liars are always known to be liars, and that their lies are grandiose? How naive and foolish. If I were a liar and wanted to get away with my lies, I'd make them more grounded in reality and believable. Liars prey on fools like this who believe things simply because it's believable. "Oh well, that could happen so it's true!"
/r/MensRights19/11/17 02:12 AM
1

You know what devalues women? Treating them as helpless victims. Take Louis C.K.'s situation, all the women sans one were asked permission, and gave it. They consented, two thought it was a joke but it wasn't. They are adults. They should have been able to go "Whoa, I thought you were joking, no." And that would have been that for them.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:37 PM
3

I'll pick my response from the allowed phrases. dude, don't say that shit.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:35 PM
1

Louis C.K. is the worst example you could give for that, given he asked for permission from everyone and got it before doing anything. If not given consent, he didn't do anything. Aside from the jerking off on the phone thing, as far as I know he didn't ask to do that. But I think I read the subjects they were talking about on the phone were sexual in nature? Not sure. But that's as easy as pushing a button to hang up even in the worst case. Inappropriate, yes. Rape/sexual assault no. Even by th…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:32 PM
2

There's a difference in recanting an idea, and being a hypocrite who only holds a contrary opinion when it benefits them. Given the type of person she is, she definitely seems like she's being a hypocrite. And will keep talking about how we should believe women, but just not women that accuse men who fund her show.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:22 PM
2

By that logic, feminists don't believe anything. There's not a single position they hold (that I can think of anyway) that doesn't contradict something else they say. Feminists just have no understanding of their positions. I don't doubt some of the higher up feminists running things don't believe it, but the peons do, because they are taught it and believe it at face value. And repeat all the positions they hold with no understanding of them, so they don't see how they run counter to each other…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:45 PM
2

Okay? Let's live life according to Tupac. Look here, Miss Thang, hate to salt your game But you's a money hungry woman and you need to change In the locker room all the homies do is laugh High five's 'cuz anotha nigga played your ass It was said you were sleazy, even easy Sleepin' around for what you need See it's your thang and you can shake it how you wanna Give it up free or make your money on the corner But don't be bad and play the game, get mad and change Then you wonda why these mothafuck…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:39 PM
1

Why was it a "secret" at all if we live in a culture that encourages and endorses rape? Why is rape even illegal at all? Why are any people put in jail for rape in a "rape culture"? Why are colleges fighting to remove due process to label young men as rapists with the same standards it takes to prove someone stole your bubblegum lip gloss in small claims. And so on. We observably do not live in a rape culture, the only arguable rape culture we have is one that affects male victims. Men raped by …
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:19 PM
2

On the plus side of the television coin, I'm watching an episode of People's Court from a few days ago and the first case in it has the judge railing on a woman. She's caught on tape, and admitted to, taking a broken 4x4 to her arm to play domestic violence victim so she can get her boyfriend arrested instead of her (it worked). A 4x4 that broke as she was smashing her boyfriend's car with it. Here's a horrible quality upload of it on YouTube. Though it's a bit embarrassing Milian, and the two g…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 11:01 PM
2

And my point was a general one, not necessarily about this specifically, but the general argument put forth and how it's flawed. Which you clearly understand. I'm all about focusing on the positive to further goals, rather than negative. Sadly, many people prefer the negative.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 08:59 PM
1

Shame you don't understand sarcasm.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 07:58 PM
-2

Mods do care. Mods have a different perspective than you do. Mods don't care to remove these types of posts. Which is exactly why I said they don't care, because they don't. If they did they'd remove them. So people who complain about these types of posts being here, should accept that mods don't care about them being posted. Thus the point. And you didn't really disagree with that, just reaffirmed it. Doesn't matter why you don't care about these posts being here, the end result is the same. Th…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 07:17 PM
1

I haven't watched anything from them since forever, with one exception between the gap when Cenk "interviewed" (screeched at) Karen. That was one of the most embarrassing things I've ever watched.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:45 PM
18

Oh okay, thanks for the clarification. That was not at all clear to me when I read through it.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:35 PM
1

That's not at all what I said. You're acting surprised that a human being can be cynical. Some people won't ever be satisfied. Clearly you are one of them. Bye now.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:35 PM
-3

I tend to agree this article is not suited for here. But good luck, mods don't care. However, I'd like to point out the flaw in your position. How do we change custody to default shared custody without "pulling females down"? You can't afford both parents default, primary custody. So you can't bring men up to where women are. You have to remove women's privilege, which is "pulling females down" in a legal sense. So how does one achieve equity without "pulling females down" in some way? Because t…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:25 PM
0

Welcome to the world, where people can be assholes about anything.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:52 PM
2

So you think women are weak? That's pretty sexist!
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:47 PM
1

I disagree with your assertion that it's "just men raging because they're losing some power", but will agree the mods should do more to tidy up the sub. But they'll just toss in a generic "we want to avoid censorship" line. Which to me is just a lazy cop out, but it is what it is.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:44 PM
7

Most people seem to be of the mindset that "different" means "inferior". It's their own insecurity that's the problem. It's like gay people who get faux offended by acknowledging that homosexuality is abnormal. "HOW DARE YOU HOMOPHOBE!" I'm gay and I can freely acknowledge it's abnormal for the human species to have gay men. Gay men don't help produce offspring, granted we can in other ways, but our relationships don't through nature. Two men can't create children together biologically. It doesn…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:36 PM
44

She doesn't. She's partly there, but still floating in the clouds. WARNING: People in the past 2 hours I have had to Spam 63 comments from losers who tried to inform me that “men and women are psychologically / emotionally, etc. different.” Once again, anybody who embarrasses him or herself by chirping idiotically “yes, men and women are different” will be banned outright. This will be my small investment into sparing these losers further public embarrassment. Stop wasting your time, such commen…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:23 PM
51

Feminist arguments often contradict the arguments made for trans rights, gay rights, and even women's rights. You can disprove feminist arguments with other feminists arguments so often it's almost sad.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:17 PM
2

Oh sweet summer child. Gay men are thrown under the bus all the time. Homophobia is "hatred of women". Religions (one in particular) that throws gay men off a roof is defended by feminists and the SJW church. Gay men get called "just as if not more so" misogynistic as straight men. Rose McGowen's attitude toward gay men is a prime example of it in action. Gay men only live to serve women if they don't, then the true feelings are revealed. They hate us just as much as they do straight men.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:24 PM
2

They'll never abandon it, because people believe it on face value. And any criticism of it, is successfully dismissed as sexism/misogyny. Why would they abandon what works?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 02:17 PM
1

Great, I guess terrorism is going to become a useless buzzword with no meaning soon enough. We're running out of words that mean something when you hear it.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 12:43 PM
12

I agree with 1, "pressured" would be more applicable. 2 is entirely false. He said they experience it TOO.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 12:37 PM
16

Judge Judy just says whatever, but she makes fuck you money on a yearly basis. As far as I'm aware she's never apologized for anything.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 12:33 PM
0

If anyone took "offense" here it's you dear. I said you're ignorant, because you ADMIT YOU ARE. I accept that I know little, "Ignorance: lack of knowledge or information." Clearly you accept your ignorance, as you got offended by me saying you're ignorant. Brilliant. You're clearly worth my time. You're as disingenuous as the day is long.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 04:55 AM
1

We don't want to win them over. No one is seeking feminist approval, well some still do ["It used to be good!"], but most aren't. And we won't join with other men's groups because we all have different ideas on what should be done. And vastly different views and points. Which is why... we're different groups to begin with.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:48 PM
1

There's that one dude cut from the Red Pill film that likes to call MRM "meninism" since he says it's a "mirror" of feminism. Which is false imo, and a top comment on that video addresses it beautifully. Video I'm talking about. Note; he's super boring to listen to. But yeah, it's not actually much of anything in real terms. Beyond parody.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:40 PM
1

I heard it on a gaming stream not that long ago, a few weeks? And was like "the fuck is that"? I think I even spelled it wrong when I googled it. lol And I've been hear a long time too. I've heard of PUA, MGTOW, Red Pill, Return of Kings... never "Incels". Woman [not to be confused with feminist] hating gets downvoted into oblivion here. And usually told to fuck off.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:35 PM
2

Would you call the girl in my class who pants a boy in our gym class "more than just a creep"? I don't know. I think "creep" is pretty apt a description for the severity of it personally. What would you call it if not "creepy".
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:31 PM
3

He said in the hallway. So it was during school hours. Akin to tripping someone, or throwing an eraser at them. Only a bra strap being pulled back.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:30 PM
1

How soon people forget history. Make this about black men over a hundred years ago and they'll sing a different tune. Rightfully. That same issue is still present today, and always will be. People lie, we can't just believe things just because someone says something. Otherwise there really is a governmental conspiracy to hide a second moon. We need to protect victims of all kinds. Which means those falsely accused as well. Stop repeating history you idiots.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:27 PM
2

If this argument works, then that brainless person I argued with a few days ago on this very sub saying that anyone who believes in equality is a feminist is also right. And any criticism of feminism is invalid because they aren't feminists, because feminist believe in equality. Feminism isn't a descriptive word. It is an ideology that you subscribe to. You do not have to identify as a feminist to support feminist rhetoric, or even benefit feminism as a movement. But you can't just call people f…
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:23 PM
1

lol, there's like two references as far back as I bothered on their twitter post about the name being bad (one is vague "WTF that name", the other repeats the hate group meme) There's more non-English responses than complaints, and one that understood the Matrix reference. Most people are just excited fans. I didn't check as much on the Facebook equivalent post, but I didn't see a single complaint. Apologizing for a controversy that I don't even see. Nice. And men's rights is the horrible associ…
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:16 PM
3

I don't know why people fall all over themselves to appease feminists, they don't like anything. Nothing will ever be good enough, because they want feminism to exist and to be in positions of power and authority. They will, and have, invented things just to keep adding to the laundry list. Doesn't affect me. Adam's voice has always made me cringe. But I think it's quite funny that they know nothing about it, yet they are so opposed to "men's rights stuff". We had no idea about the association w…
/r/MensRights11/11/17 01:09 PM
18

I don't think anybody was pretending Yahoo was Google before she came along. Yahoo was a joke before, but they got a lot worse under her "leadership".
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:54 PM
1

That looks like the "airconditioning is sexist" woman. Not even going to bother watching. I don't want my brain to catch on fire.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:29 PM
-5

i pretty much accept that I'd be swimming up hill in this sub And you want to argue you aren't a concern troll? You seem like one to me. I accept that I know little, but that is why one must ask questions right?.. MRAs constantly bring up this question to feminists directly, to which they deflect (bringing up the third world, or conflating "feeling safe" with legal rights, which it isn't) or completely ignore it and call you a laundry list of buzzword insults. however if there is a whole movemen…
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:26 PM
2

Ordinary standard doesn't mean you're a mustache twirling villain either. I think believing in equality is not a high standard. And holding true to your beliefs is not a high standard either. They are basic standards. How about we stop overselling basic shit. It's like when people start praising the bare minimum from a feminist who is simply open to discussion. That's some low ass standards if you praise something that most people do already.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:21 PM
2

Men have been running things since the beginning and look where we are. Yeah, we got to be the dominant species on the planet.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:26 AM
1

That undermines mental health issues. It takes a broken mind to commit a mass shooting. Saying this is just going to make men feel worse, and men with existing mental health problems go further down. You could say similar things about women and killing children, but that'd be equally stupid. It is mental illness to commit these acts. No normal, healthy person would kill their children, or commit murder (let alone mass murder).
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:19 AM
9

The full interview is quite entertaining. Other than Couric. Later on she talks about men feeling they have to provide, and men having the drive (paraphrasing) to push for promotions and women not having that as much. Smart lady
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:27 AM
2

After my first date with my now fiance he asked if he could kiss me and I was put off by just the question. I wanted to, I just was thrown by being asked. Had we had the time [he was dropping me off at home] then I probably would have managed to say what I wanted 10 minutes later. Or would have got the courage to push myself to do it or ask for it. People can be silly sometimes. And that's just a kiss. Not sex. There's way more baggage around sex. I don't know why people act like situations arou…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 08:45 AM
9

But what about gay men and our relationship with our masculinity? Why are we usually left out of the discussion about what it means to be a man? I have never really felt left out of discussions of masculinity as a gay man... unless it's specifically related to heterosexuality, but then that's not really a discussion about masculinity at that point. Yes, as a gay man I enjoy the privilege of being male in a patriarchal society that for some reason values my genitals above a woman’s. Which is why …
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:20 PM
2

I don't think it matters the situation. A division of assets is fine. Like I said, if you can't afford to live off just that, then your former spouse is likely not making enough for you to get much out of alimony to begin with. For me it is just bad. And, I can't see a valid reason for it to exist. I can understand personal choice in supporting someone you care for, like the mother of your child, but who you split up with amicably for various reasons. But outside of choosing to be a good person,…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 05:03 PM
1

You should be able to reasonably support yourself off half the assets worth. If you can't, odds are then your ex can't support you through alimony to begin with. Alimony is unnecessary and makes no sense. The necessities of life aren't that much. Just because you "grew accustom" to a certain life style, doesn't mean your ex-husband (or rarely wife) has to pay for it. That's retarded. But that's exactly how alimony is. It's not about "need". All you really "need" is a hotel for sleep and food. Bu…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:34 AM
4

But... if she didn't sign it should couldn't get married! She did it under duress! /s
/r/MensRights09/11/17 07:24 AM
3

Does the homemaker have to pay back the bread winner for the costs of living over the years? Why does one person get re-reimbursed, but not the other? They both sacrifice. They both benefit. It's a wash, and should be treated as such. Rather than devalue the very real value in not needing to work to earn money for food, bills, insurance, clothing, etc. That has actual monetary value you can easily determine too.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 07:07 AM
2

I have yet to hear a convincing argument in favor of alimony as a concept. The closest is "Well what if a little old lady spent her 70 years of marriage being a mother and wife and her husband divorces her!" Well, she got 70 years of free living in exchange. She didn't "get nothing" that entire time. Tell me where you live if you get free food, a free house, free clothes, and all that just for existing. Because she didn't get those things for nothing. It was an exchange, a partnership where both…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 07:00 AM
1

It's literally speculation since you're not the people referred to. You can say yours is more likely, but you can't state it's exactly what was going through their minds. Good for you internet PhD. Gave an internet cookie.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:22 AM
4

You can turn off voice chat, and mute specific people. Also "turned your stomach"? Really? Shit talking turned your stomach? And made you "terrified" to play again? smdh
/r/MensRights08/11/17 12:50 AM
3

"element".
/r/MensRights08/11/17 12:49 AM
1

I have no idea how people can think that attitude is progressive. Some people enjoy selling sex, and from at least some of them I've listened to it's not all about sex for the men either.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 12:42 AM
1

I must have missed the part where he hit her in self defense, and then shot her in the face 100 times.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 12:41 AM
4

Why would a person CHOOSING to sell sex want their costumers to be arrested for buying from them? It'd be like if everyone that ate at McDonald's was arrested, but selling McDonald's was perfectly legal. They'd go out of business, and it just makes no fucking sense to do it that way. This may help those forced into it, but it would also help them if it were just legalized and thus regulated properly. Since either way you can't force someone to have sex for money against their will, or through th…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 11:46 AM
8

The jokes done at Meg's expense on Family Guy aren't misogyny either. Difference is that Family Guy is known for it's offensive, lowbrow humor. Is Conan O'Brian known to be like Family Guy? Do people watch it expecting to see rape humor, farting in people's faces, extreme violence, a sexualized baby and dog, etc? No. Conan's known for being a goofball. Not interchangeable contexts. Pointing out hypocrisy is not being offended, by the way. The more people are aware of these double standards, the …
/r/MensRights07/11/17 11:12 AM
1

So you know the reason those people said what they said definitively. Cool.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 11:05 AM
1

It's not a good point, it's stupid.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:34 AM
1

And technically if women didn't give birth to male children, then there'd be no men to begin with, therefore no men killing anyone. I guess it's all women's fault. /s
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:34 AM
1

Except that men rescue people from more than things like shootings. They help beached dolphins back into the ocean while women watch and film it on their phones. They do impossible feats to get people off the tracks while a car is coming, they put themselves in harms way when a car flies into a building so they can save a child; rather than just saving themselves. Examples of male heroism far exceed situations like this. It's not a bad argument, it's the perfect one to argue against this blatant…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:32 AM
1

It's not ill-defined. You're simply over thinking it. And that's giving you credit, because otherwise I'd say you're just being a contrarian.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:27 AM
1

I said don't be daft, not double down on it.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 04:25 AM
48

I think they meant the experimental group and how ethical it would be to perform the procedure on babies just to do the study. But then that kind of calls into question why it's ethical to do it at all. If you can't do it for a study on the effects of it... why is it legal at all?
/r/MensRights06/11/17 01:07 PM
3

Obviously not. Use your brain.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 01:02 PM
2

I'm glad it's happening. Maybe Druckmann will learn that trying to appease these people is stupid and stop trying and get to making good games and characters again. And stop removing fun skins like Donut Drake from games. But one of ND's concept artists is a major SJW and whispers into his ears, "well can't this character be a minority?" So I doubt it. The same woman who whined on twitter that a guy (if even a true story) jokingly wanted to "check her gaming cred" after finding out she plays gam…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 10:00 AM
1

Smoking? wat And "hangout" has been slang for "hook up/fuck" for ages. So it's very ambiguous if you only mean to "hangout". I'd rather encourage people to be clear with their intentions and wants. If you don't know whether you'll agree to sex or not before you go to "hangout" then go to a public place instead of to their apartment/house. In my opinion, you should only go to somebody's house if you have already decided to fuck them. Leaving the decision open ended in your own mind until you're m…
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:53 AM
4

If you don't want to be hit by somebody, don't hit them first. She's an adult, she should know that hitting somebody has consequences. Like them defending themselves. You have no moral obligation to your attacker, don't be daft. edit; and if you want to blame it on alcohol, adults should also be aware of how it affects your body so it's no excuse to act like an animal.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:37 AM
3

Would you say this to a boxer who gets hit by some stick of a man? Doubt it.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:36 AM
3

What a stupid argument. Drinking, everyone of age 'x' at and over the law can drink. That's equality. Driving same thing with the added caviet of a license, but everyone has the equal opportunity to get one. Any thing that would change that is EQUALLY applied to everybody (ie; a DUI). Same applies to the rest. Same laws apply equal You're basically arguing semantics for no reason. "Well if you over think it, then it's not equality!" Equality for the vast majority of all people who believe in it …
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:33 AM
1

Yep, so many men risk their lives hoping down onto a subway track with an oncoming train to save someone else. Men help beached dolphins from a storm. Men do miraculous flips to protect kids from split second cars flying into a building. So many videos out there are heroism of regular men. Anyone can see that the issue is not men, unless blinded by their bigotry.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:20 AM
9

Well they try to toss in "condescendingly" to it, but... we have a word for that. You know, condescending. So it amounts to exactly what you said in practice.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 09:04 AM
2

Yep. While I'm male, I used to self harm and got institutionalized when I tried running away, and they treated it as suicidal even though I was never trying to kill myself. I did it for the endorphins to get that split moment of not feeling the weight of everything, and to actually feel like it was all real, because I felt... not sure how to describe it. 'Not alive' comes to mind, but that sounds retarded. Oh well. It's a complex issue. It's a shame that men ensuring they die is treated as "toxi…
/r/MensRights05/11/17 03:31 AM
3

After talking with that person for far too long and losing brain cells, it occurs to me their entire position hinges on the tired "do you believe in equality? THEN YOU'RE A FEMINIST!" attitude. So good luck.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 02:11 PM
6

Remove feminism from the dictionary. Equality, egalitarianism and equalism all exist. Yet you're fighting for a singular word which plain meaning is already covered in other words and terms. Choosing to live in ignorance, ignoring that the vast majority of feminism and feminists fight for inequality, so you can cling to a fucking word like an imbecile. But since "they aren't real feminists" it doesn't count. And you have to have feminism, because reasons. That's the most important thing in the w…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:57 PM
12

Feminism is the equality of the sexes. What you just said is effectively "Why is it so important that you protect equality of the sexes rather than equality?" which makes no sense. Well you just proved my point that you care more about feminism than equality. And no it isn't equality. Toss out the dictionary definition all you like, it doesn't change feminists pushing for inequality constantly. Let me read your mind; "But they're not feminists!" But you support equality. Mmhmm. A femminist canno…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 09:25 AM
1

Look at OP's history, he's just a karma whore looking for upvotes by posting low quality crap, often posting the same thing in different subs. Literally one actual comment made on the first page of his history. Unfortunately the mods here let shit like this stay for no reason with the false reason of "anti-censorship". So karma whores love hanging around. OP is clearly not bothered, he wants the karma.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 08:55 AM
2

Which is what the vast majority of comments (all the ones I read at least; I didn't read them all) are saying; that this is fucking stupid. Are you offended then since you said it's "dumb shit" which is pretty much what everyone is saying? No one is saying they're oppressed or offended.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 07:33 AM
2

In this world of crazy randomness, it's nice to have something reliable. The stupidity of Cosmo is one of these constants.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 07:31 AM
6

Ditto from the gay male perspective. I think most people are this way.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 07:31 AM
1

Men orgasm more because it's easier for them to orgasm more quickly, from my understanding and experience. For a reason. It's necessary for procreation that men achieve orgasm. It is not necessary for procreation for women to achieve orgasm. Thus it's easy for men to orgasm, as it's necessity for the survival of the species.
/r/MensRights04/11/17 07:29 AM
30

All I've heard is that we should be equal... Anything else and they wouldn't be feminist. I'm going to give you something to consider. Why is it so important that you protect feminism, rather than equality? If people criticize feminists for doing bad things, and your answer is not to join in on that criticism... then how are you supporting equality? Are you not just protecting feminism itself? If you were supporting equality, acknowledge these feminists and push them out of feminism. And no, jus…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 07:25 AM
1

To avoid needing to have sex or as a reward for good behavior. /female comedian
/r/MensRights04/11/17 07:19 AM
2

If you can't understand how your last comment could be taken the wrong way then I don't know what to tell you.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 11:53 AM
3

She has a smile on her face. There's no evidence it's unwanted touching. So you can't say it's sexual assault without that. We'd have to find whoever that is and ask if they're alive. I'm not even sure the context of that photo. Looks like it's a liberation type of thing to me, but I don't know. So since we can't verify that, it's definitely not "rape culture". If it were sexual assault, then I suppose you could argue that it represents rape culture. But we can't do that without first proving it…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 09:10 AM
7

Eh, you're being defensive of accusations of sexism not "fair". If the "to be fair" applies to the second paragraph as well. Feminism isn't important anywhere. Anywhere that women have major issues, men have major issues. Those places need egalitarianism. Otherwise you end up with the problems of the west. See India as an example. To solve actual problems, you need to look at the big picture to find real solutions. And feminism won't do that, it will blame patriarchy and men. Act as though women…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 09:01 AM
3

We need a tag for "Projection".
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:54 AM
3

Maybe read the comment next time. Which is why you don't make it a contest.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:50 AM
2

I've seen similar on twitter, not sure what people are saying. I can't believe anyone. People are saying it's the mother's word, but then others say the little girl said as much... but did she say it in court? Did she say it to her mother and told court this? Did the mother say the child said it? Because that's just hearsay. Would like to read a good article with more details without a slant. I see a man suffering too. Twitter sees a POS actor and bias against black women. :/ (every thing I've s…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:28 AM
10

$13k is ridiculous. I can't even imagine how lavishly you'd have to treat a child to spend $13k a month on them. You know most of that is not going to the child. It can't. And if it is, then it must be frivolous shit that the child doesn't need. Which is bad parenting. $156,000 a year for child support toward one child... how. Child support needs overhauled entirely. This is retarded. If you can't afford to pay half of necessities yourself, you probably shouldn't even have full custody.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:23 AM
2

Men can be victims. Anyone can be. What matters is distinguishing what actually makes a difference. "Microaggressions" are not something MRM supports. So how are MRAs like feminists? Feminists want everyone but straight white cis men to be victims about everything. If you feel like a victim you are! MRAs just acknowledge that men can be victims of actual things that make people victims when it happens to them. Like rape, domestic violence, a biased court system, and so on. Acknowledging victimho…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:05 AM
12

"arguably" would like to be acknowledged as a word that I used and have a word with you.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 07:45 AM
11

If it's a contest, then no one living today in the first world can complain about anything. Since we don't have it as bad as other people in the world [men and women]. And if you want to find the most oppressed people, they'd arguably be throughout history. Rather than alive today. So I guess nobody today will ever be able to complain again. Which is why you don't make it a contest. I don't think sexualization is a huge problem, but I can understand why he feels unsettled by it happening to him.…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 07:34 AM
2

What? "Slutwalk" people will be triggered regardless of context of it's use if a man uses it. I use it entirely to describe a person that sleeps around with a lot of people. But that's "slut shaming". You can insult someone by calling them smart. Is smart a bad word now? No. That's stupid. If someone is insulting you, they are insulting you. IT'S NOT THE WORD(S) USED THAT MATTERS. It's their intent to insult. If you are not insulted by simple words, it just removes their power. And empowers you …
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:40 AM
1

That's a fair point.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:21 AM
8

"They did not tell us that the doctor was not on duty. The medics took the child and [literally] performed an experiment,” he said angrily. “My son was only one month old when I brought him to the hospital 15 days ago,” the father continued... Stuff like this makes me want to shake people until sense is restored. Yeah, he was only one month old when you took him to get an elective surgery because I assume your religious beliefs say to do it. Other people's actions are ridiculous, but they were c…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:17 PM
406

"Do I think my position is the same as a woman’s in society? No." You're very much right, but sadly from context you don't understand why that is. You think it's the feminist way, that you can't possibly know what it's like to live as an oppressed class such as women. In reality, it's that you're not allowed to feel this way. You don't matter enough to society to have feelings. We can't care about you. If we cared about men as we did women, then the loss of men in war would have crippled nations…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:24 PM
2

Of course, and some deliberately dress to attract attention. I meant it more generally from the onset.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 11:09 AM
5

I forget which, but either Disney or Nickelodeon has shows that girls hit boys in. Maybe both, not sure. My googlefu is poo. But it's definitely supposed to be super hilarious. As hilarious as some terrible tween show can be.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 10:11 AM
1

In the "grow up" context, I have no issue with "man up" and think it's a stupid thing to be upset about. In some contexts, it's valid to tell someone to stop being a baby and get over something. At a certain point, we need to be able to handle life on our own. If these perpetually offended were told to "grow up" rather than coddled, we'd have a better time as a society. In terms of "man up" and stop having emotion, stop being upset that your children were taken from you, go to war and protect so…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:59 AM
3

The way he worded it is stupid as hell, but I think... at least if I'm understanding his underlying point... it's fairly valid. In that women dress to attract attention of men. Whether they know it or not. I don't think most women are going to be looking the closet going "What will attract me a manz" or anything. But I think women understand what gets them male attention on a subconscious level, and if they actually thought about it... would know some of the basics. Like "oh, men like cleavage a…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:48 AM
1

Well you also did that... Original quote It's what men do. You It is not a part of what it is to be male or even be a man. That's not what was originally stated either. They said it's "what men do". Which is that it's an action men partake in, which is true [this even carries into online dating]. It wasn't argued that it defines men or maleness or anything of the sort. Just a much of misunderstandings/interpretations going on. Ah humans.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:29 AM
6

I think the crux of the issue is women still feeling to be seen as pure, innocent, virgin-esk creatures. Maybe not even wanting to be seen that way, but to feel that way themselves. Maybe some women who do this aren't actually happy being "sexually free" and would be happier, and more willing to admit they enjoy and like sex and be less passive about it if they were more conservative. As contrary as that seems. Although, "lady in the streets, freak in the sheets" had to have come from somewhere.…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:22 AM
2

ew
/r/MensRights01/11/17 09:03 AM
3

You literally made up an argument I didn't make to argue a point that is completely irrelevant. That's a strawman. Disingenuous fool. And you continue doing it. Your point is fuck the women and their need for sanitary products Nope. . If we all go fuck you Didn't say that. No one has. by seeing that this issue is unique to women and helping them achieve it they may start to see that their are issues that affect men uniquely. See, you're literally saying we should support it SOLELY because it's u…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:32 PM
1

Eh, "push" was the wrong word. Not "most". Most men are going to tacitly support women's issues. Only one with rage is the one saying all women are naturally manipulative and can't be red pilled and only exist to exploit men. And that's not me, dear. Bye.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:31 PM
2

I guess "and don't have access to other information" is the part that let you put Africa only. Yes. That's exactly why. I think if you do something out of ignorance, then it's your fault if you have the access to alternate information and just choose not to care to investigate before making a decision. If you do it after and regret it, I don't really care. You should do that before doing something irreversible. Adults should be responsible for their actions. If you buy a car you can't afford and…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:29 PM
1

You realize there's a general use of the word "you" right? "You can't just walk into a store and walk out with what you want." That's general use of the word "you:, it's not about YOU specifically. You are a moron. Projection, dear.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:21 PM
4

We will not get our voices heard by just saying women shouldn't get things because men don't need them. That's a massive strawman if there ever was one. Where the hell did I say that I didn't think it was a BASIC RIGHT because men don't need it? Fucking nowhere. I brought up toilet paper for a reason. I gave examples of what I believe constitute "basic rights" for a reason. Yet you still ignored it all to view women as victims. You confirmed my initial suspicions that I avoided putting in my ori…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:09 PM
6

And I disagree. I feel like it's not. Just because this uniquely benefits women, doesn't mean we have to agree with it either. Being comfortable is not a "basic right". That's massively overselling it. I also wouldn't say that toilet paper is a "basic right". It's a privilege, and current hygienic standard to utilize these things. And it's better to have than not, but "basic right"? No. To me basic rights are more like access to drinkable water, freedom of [and from] religion, and things of that…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:57 AM
2

Projection. You feel what these people think. Did you ask them? The pay gap here is treated entirely like a punchline. Which it is. lol, it's funny you say that. Because in a post about that, just a few moments ago, I made a joke comment about it. The wage gap myth has been debunked for decades now. I can't speak for everyone, but I've been over it for awhile. Tired of hearing about it. So when I do, I just make light of how absurd it is and how absurd a solution would have to be to really work.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:32 AM
10

People who have legitimate religious belief in this will continue to do it. And if it's illegal then it'd be abuse and thus punished as it should be. No religious text should ever allow you to abuse another person or inflict permanent bodily harm (mutilation) on them. improperly performed circumcisions you've concluded that a simple ban will do. All MGM is mutilation and damages the human penis, some just have more issues than others but it's all still mutilation and the vast, vaaaast majority i…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:30 AM
1

Do you think women are adults responsible for themselves, and hold them to the same standards as you do men? Because that's totally horrible to expect from women according to some people. So in that sense... it's 'true'.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:18 AM
13

So she'll force women into careers they do not want, but will pay better? Because that's the only way to fix the earnings gap. To force everyone into jobs that benefit an "equality" outcome, Futurama-style. As long as women and men are free to live their lives as they see fit, men and women will earn differently.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:12 AM
11

The ramifications... you can't force your religious dogma on infants or others. You have to wait until you're 18 to get your "chance of salvation". So you have time to actually think about religion, where you stand on it, and actually can choose not to commit to the religion (while not having irreversible, permanent damage done to your body at infancy!) And nothing was lost, but much is gained. Some Jewish and Muslim people don't even practice it as it is. The rest will get over it. As Christian…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 10:58 AM
3

I specified your sweeping generalizations. If you keep hearing that when you make your sweeping generalizations, maybe the problem is you. If you're talking about what I was saying, there's a far cry between "most" and "all". You are saying all women are one way. I never made such ludicrous claims.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 09:19 AM
1

I didn't say he was, I'm speaking generally. So I stopped reading beyond your complete misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 09:16 AM
1

And all of men's contraceptive options are available to women as well. Condoms, abstinence and a medical procedure (vasectomy/tubectomy). Granted the procedure isn't exactly the same, but it's as close as you can get when men and women are different biologically. But I think it's still comparable and apt to say they are "the same options". Sidenote, I had to google what the actual procedure was called for women (aka; Tubal ligation). Spellcheck in firefox doesn't even know what it is. Just inter…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 05:53 AM
2

Lets assume for the sake of argument that the boy enjoyed it, I mean really enjoyed it. Lets assume he had no lasting bad consequences. You can't assume there are no lasting consequences. It can take years for these issues to manifest, or they could be affecting his day to life for years without ever realizing that this is the reason he mistrusts women, or whatever. Which is why you don't accept adults fucking kids. And yes he's a kid. Teenagers are still kids, think of yourself and what you use…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:51 AM
0

Would be easy in feminist standards of "misogyny". In that something as simple as disagreeing with feminism on anything = misogyny (or internalized misogyny if you're a woman). But yeah anything I would find to be misogyny is generally hidden already by the time I find it. And I do my part in downvoting such nonsense if I do find it before then
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:33 AM
5

Let's propose two lighthearted events and see which seems to be more logical. Let's ignore the subject of sexual assault for this exercise. Two friends are in front of a camera, having a grand ol' time acting silly. One friend grabs the other in the crotch, and the other friend plays along with it. Everyone's happy. Two friends are in front of a camera, having a grand ol' time acting silly. One friend says to the other, "Could I grab your crotch for a joke?" and the other friend replies "yes" an…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:24 AM
11

For adults doing it to their own bodies. Nothing inherently, unless the men decide it based on lies and don't have access to other information. Like men in Africa. For infants having it done without consent. Everything, short of actual medical need. And it's rarely ever needed. The claimed health benefits are inconsequential, and/or outright falsehoods. Similar health claims are made for FGM as well. There's health benefit to removing the breasts of girls, but we don't suggest that when they're …
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:14 AM
16

Your religious rights, end where someone else's begin. You can't enforce your religious right on others. If you want to chop up your own dick, go for it. Take a cheese grater to it, I don't give a shit. But that's where it ends, with your own body and life. An infant has no religious beliefs either. I also doubt you support FGM where it's religious or part of the custom/bonding between mother and daughter. Because it's stupid to, just as it's stupid to hold contradicting views for MGM just becau…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 04:04 AM
4

And now they pander to men with red pill knowledge as an angle to control/manipulate men. But most men push for women's issues, even perceived ones.. so why would they exit feminism for that? Hell, they never needed feminism for it to begin with. Supporting the "red pill" isn't going to get more male attention than the "blue pill" does. Why bother controlling a weak, powerless minority of men vs the powerful majority? Your argument doesn't even make logical sense. How many times have you heard t…
/r/MensRights31/10/17 03:55 AM
1

There's a difference in letting your kid do what they want in a healthy way, and replacing parenting with electronics.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 07:50 AM
1

That's how a sizeable amount of parents do it though.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:47 PM
1

Your saying shit like this makes feminists sound sane. He said, "It may be difficult, it may be challenging, but it is not work." I don't really get it, but he admitted it can be difficulty and/or challenging. He just has a different definition of what constitutes "work". I don't see how what he said makes feminists look sane.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:46 PM
2

Because it took me two FUCKING hours while youve been doing laundry and dishes for a half hour Automated in a lot of homes. So it amounts to putting things in a machine, and then taking them out and putting them away. It's tedious, not hard. [edit; lol, a song I was listened to had lyrics "it's not hard, it's not hard, it's not hard" in it after I posted this]
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:42 PM
10

And she gave her sister candy so she'd kiss her, and she'd masturbate next to her sister. This was not just some little kid doing something weird, it was years of dysfunctional, predatory shit. And she looks back on it with fondness in her book and people like you erase most of it and act like it's just some innocent thing like taking baths as siblings. It wasn't. She's vile.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 05:32 PM
1

just don't want to admit that women are part of our world, and ignoring issues on the other side of the fence is just as bad as them doing it to us. So you admit it's not a men's issue now. Progress. Let me quote the sidebar for you, since you seem to be lost. The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon. Not "a place to discuss how feminism is harming women". Which is why I mentioned an egalitarian sub in my origina…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 11:54 PM
1

I don't think the issues is that simple. Unfortunately. I know the "MRM" in general does in fact push for it. But I think there's a lot of kind of passing anti-feminist sentiment with no real stake in the game for men's rights. Kind of like atheists who just want to shit on religion in passing, but actually don't care at all about the damage an organized religion can create. They just want to call people stupid and things. I think that's mostly the issue here. I won't deny that some are likely j…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 11:46 PM
108

Remember Steve Martin getting backlash saying about Carrie Fisher sometime after she passed... When I was a young man, Carrie Fisher was the most beautiful creature I had ever seen. She turned out to be witty and bright as well. Got enough complaints he deleted it. Granted tons of people defended it. I think less would defend the above without the lesbians. Even if it's friends, as a lot of people are using to defend it. Particularly with the Weinstein stuff I think if Katy has no issue with it,…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:53 AM
1

I've been hear for years, dear. Check my history. Hell just check my posts in this sub the last 24 hours and you'll see I'm not a concern troll. You can't dismiss valid criticism or concern as "concern trolling" without bothering to even look at someone's post history. I've seen the common growth of low quality shitposting over take things actually related to men's rights and it's getting old. There's a limit on how much you can argue a passing connection because "well feminism hurts men, so any…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:29 AM
1

But this doesn't have anything at all to do with men. How feminism treats women, ie; giving the false idea you can "have it all" and ignore biology to women... affects men... in no direct way. It's about as loose a connection as saying that women are victims of war because they lose their male loved ones. It's true, but it's really stupid to draw that from the issue.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:24 AM
0

Troll confirmed.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 03:22 AM
2

tourettes*
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:15 PM
1

Women have equality of opportunity and sacrificing your personal life for your professional life has consequences. In terms of men's rights, countering the false propaganda is important. If this was posting in a reply to that argument being made then sure. But it's not. It's just an individual instance which has nothing to do with men.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:13 PM
2

Studies have found statistically significant difference between how much people give to white and black homeless people, depending on factors of the person doing the giving. And white homeless people who have never gotten anything from anyone? How am I putting forward a political position in wanting to view every individual as an individual? Talk about projection, you are pushing a political position. Where we have to universally see every black person as inherently disadvantaged or we're "woefu…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:12 PM
-1

This sub is for Men's Rights. Go to an egalitarian sub (or create one) if you want to discuss both. Taking every opportunity to shit on feminism, even when it doesn't affect men, just makes this an anti-feminism sub rather than a men's rights sub.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:06 PM
1

By posting things you are opening it up for opinions from others. So yes, you are in essence asking for it. Stop being a troll to every person that doesn't agree with you.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:02 PM
1

Quagmire on Family Guy is a rapist and that joke has been made many, many, many, many times. Hell, when Susie Swanson is born he says something like "It's hard to believe she's 18". The opposite is portrayed in media as comedy. Whether it's your brand of comedy is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:28 AM
1

I think that's a problem with "I'm a survivor!" It's defining yourself by an event of trauma. How many people say that about being robbed/mugged? Even if you get assaulted, or someone tries to kill you... how many people actually go about defining themselves by "surviving" it? They just move on with life. Go through therapy and get help if needed to overcome the trauma. But they do not embrace the trauma as part of their identity. That seems very dangerous to me.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:26 AM
1

Brooklyn 99 doesn't have a laugh track... I don't see the issue in general with it, just that there's a double standard. I don't buy into blaming media for people's shitty behaviors. I blame the shitty people for being shit.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:22 AM
23

I don't see what this has to do with Men's Rights. I understand the problem, but ultimately it's an issue with women and feminism lying to them.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:17 AM
2

Okay then. I want to see receipts of that then.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:12 AM
3

but that doesn’t mean it’s absolute and applies to every white man in every situation. Then it doesn't exist. You can't say it's a privilege and then say "well it sometimes doesn't work!" It's either a privilege to be white, and thus it is universally beneficial to you, or it isn't. a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group of people. Nowhere does it say "under certain circumstances". People are individuals with individual privileges and di…
/r/MensRights25/10/17 02:07 AM
1

Yes. I have.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 01:50 AM
-1

Exploiting a homeless man for such a petty, joking argument is gross to me.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 01:49 AM
2

lets not pretend like this community is just better because we are male. I want to see receipts of people saying this; "we're better because we're male!"
/r/MensRights25/10/17 01:48 AM
529

Wendy/her show/her audience is horrible. On her show she's encouraged women to lie about taking birth control to get pregnant. She may have some kind of point here, or she may just want to be a bitch to her audience. But she is a horrid human being.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 01:39 AM
3

What a stupid argument. She's drunk to the point of throwing up, is it unreasonable to think that she would be a bit out of it and not think to lock the door? I always lock the door, but sometimes I'm just a bit out of it and forget. Does that mean I want someone to come in and watch me taking a dump or shower with me? No. And she didn't "let him join her in the shower" he just got in. She said no, he got out. It's a situation of completely misreading the signals. If there were even signals at a…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:23 PM
2

No, she says she was throwing up and wanted to clean herself off/feel better so went to shower. He then took his clothes off and followed thinking it was a signal. He was wrong.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:20 PM
6

The logic doesn't even make sense, all anyone ever talks about is the violence of men (toward women). Even with the use of domestic violence and such. So... How hidden is this lie really? Not at all. It's at the forefront of the discussion. It's never enough. Nevermind the fact that he is, and people like him are, erasing victims constantly by doing this.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:16 PM
3

And if the entire crowd rushes on stage and simply gropes him? Or anyone? Is it still a non-issue? How stupid. No one should have to accept being groped. Should we act like it's rape? Or tell those who are groped to live in perpetual fear? No. But that doesn't make it okay to do or that people should just go "welp, just another day. It's no different than them saying hello to me". Everyone is entitled to their personal space and for people not to sexually assault them.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:13 PM
6

Sorry, but your feelings are you own. You can't use your feelings, even if they are formed from personal experience, to justify your bigotry. Some people have bad experiences with black people, are they justified in generalizing all black people? No. It doesn't matter if they're a minority. Maybe that person lived in a predominantly black area so they were actually the minority in that case. But let's just go with women, is it okay for a man to say that all women are child murderers if his ex-wi…
/r/MensRights23/10/17 06:07 PM
2

Men - The forgotten gender | Deepika Bhardwaj | TEDxIIFTDelhi has 626,880 views. Warren Farrel's has almost 200k. People are so pessimistic. Share the good videos, rather than whining about the feminist one. Which I assume you clicked on to check the rating ratio. Giving it more views. Just saying. Edit; hell click baity retarded sounding shit has way more views than that feminism one. "After watching this your brain with not be the same" 14million. Feminism is doomed. Clickbaitism reigns.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 12:31 AM
1

She started her journey via A Voice For Men and half-reading some of the more provocative articles there. It's all in the documentary, I watched it yesterday it's pretty great. I highly recommend it.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 11:48 PM
3

Whereas posts about bathrooms on R/MensRights get thousands of upvotes and appear on R/all. Learn2Reddit Seriously. Pictures are easy to consume content. That's the vast majority of what gets upvotes on reddit. Not articles, not discussions, or things with sources. It's easy to consume shit. This is an issue with the platform of reddit.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:30 PM
1

That very much is part of the issue. If there was enough space that you could do jumping jacks between you and the other passengers, it'd be hard as fuck to convince anyone that they touched you at all. It's easy to accuse people when you're packed in like that. It could not even happen and no one would know the difference. Not the case if there's actually enough space.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:24 PM
7

It's different because no one thinks the "female gaze" at it were is "harmful" to men. Where as the reverse is often said. People think that men looking at women can be "intimidating". Some feminists go as far as to call it "violence". You're safe to ogle all the men you want. Men aren't going to be met with the same reaction from many women. Even if the men feel uncomfortable from you, they won't say anything because no one cares about men's feelings. If you complain about a man doing it to you…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:22 PM
1

I would love to know how many instances of this are due to overcrowding. Meaning, how many are actually just random brush ups due to the lack of space and being in a moving train car (or other public transit). I've been in plenty of crowds and know that sometimes you accidentally bump into somebody, or vise versa. If you look at life through a lens of "everything that happens to me is because I'm a woman, and is an attack on me" then you would view this as sexual assault/groping/whatever. I don'…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:18 PM
1

Seems like a bad idea to me that would just get anyone using it to be attacked as a rapist.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:44 PM
2

Trying it doesn't mean you're bi, to me. It's if you actually ended up liking it and want to keep doing it. I think people experimenting with new things sexually is just being curious. Not one thing or another. It's like trying anal, but then not liking it and not doing it again. Does that mean you're "into anal" since you did it once? Obviously not. So why would eating a vagina out once make you full on bisexual with no other context to it?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:41 PM
2

That is not what I was referring to. Fear doesn't spread like that. "I was walking down the street and some guy looked really scary and I had to walk past him and I was so freaked out" isn't enough to make people think their lives are at risk on a regular basis. But "I was grabbed while I was walking home and I barely got away with my life" or "I spent the night in hospital because this total psycho attacked me two blocks from my house" will certainly do. That's not what most people talk about, …
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:27 PM
4

And then there is the other point of view. Nearly all women have at least one friend or family member that has recounted a harrowing or frightening experience out at night. Some are that friend or family member. This fear doesn't come at the hands of tales of roving bands of women assaulting people. It comes from hearing about a man accosting them in the dead of night. I'm a man and have had the same type of thing happen to me. Walking by a bar at night with drunk men yelling at me to "come over…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:18 PM
2

I suggest you find a place to ask questions to janitors. Because they will tell you the complete opposite. The TV idea that women's bathrooms are so clean they have couches and lounging areas in them is a complete, and utter delusion. The horror stories I've heard from janitors about women's bathrooms. This is just a stereotype people believe because it's repeated endlessly. But anyone that's experienced it first hand, knows better. Women can be very disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:42 PM
1

Without the signs neither look like bathrooms. lol
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:39 PM
3

Vanessa continued: 'When I realized that feminists were actually pushing views that harmed men, it made me get involved to kind of even the playing field.' But if only she could even the wage gap. Ugh. 'But with men it's kind of a different story, because they are not as free to express their sexuality as women might be. We are all about telling men it's okay to have sexual attraction.' It would seem that men have no problem acting on their attraction especially in light of such scandals such as…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:28 PM
3

If it's so dangerous, why not give women a curfew like we used to do? I mean, it's not like criminal men would care about a curfew. But at least if we lock up women, that we can protect them from the evil world. Freedom has it's risks. Camille Paglia and feminists like her understood this then and fought for women's freedom to take these risks, and she's been arguing the same common sense things for decades. Being free doesn't mean you're safe from every possible risk. A utopian dream is an impo…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:16 PM
7

Feminism isn't much different from religion so...
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:02 PM
1

To deny women lie, is to deny their humanity. And these people think they're the "progressive" ones. How cute.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:01 PM
1

Stopped reading at microaggressions. Those aren't a thing.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:52 PM
1

Since no man knows how to wash themselves, there's no benefit to removing the foreskin for this reason then. Thanks for your support lady! :D Seriously though. If you've got bad hygiene, not having foreskin isn't going to magically make you (or your dick) smell better. And foreskin helps keep the penis clean until it starts to retract naturally. :/ People are so ignorant about the penis.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:41 PM
1

Beautifully stated.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:31 PM
0

It's literally no different than political correctness. He thinks it's "polite" to not utter a word when discussing that word. That's not integrity, it's hypocrisy. It's not commendable, it's silly. How is it any less polite to try and ban the book because it uses the same word he is afraid, I mean "too polite", to use? Why are they not commendable and filled with integrity?
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:29 PM
4

How is it polite to not use a word when talking about the word itself? Try to talk about apples without using the word apples. It offends me. kthx "the a word" yeah no. It's literally the context of the word itself. It's not directed at someone, it's reference of the word used in a book. Fucking hell.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:26 PM
1

Sounds like he has some issues dealing with people. Maybe he has anxiety, maybe it's worse when he talks to women. Or some other reason for it, like Aspergers. Rather than "he's an evil man, mah sexism".
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:20 PM
2

This is entirely hearsay. "This guy said these awful things" Well of course he did, biased third party. And he's not entirely wrong. It's not the case for every woman, but many are being preferred over men for no reason other than gender. That is sexism. Oh but I guess women can't lie or exaggerate, or reframe events in their mind to fit their narrative. Only men would ever do that. Women aren't human, they're Goddesses. Infallible. amirite?
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:19 PM
1

Pizzey has never identified as a feminist.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:03 PM
3

How many times do you need to go to the supermarket? We live in a world with digital assistants. Make a damn shopping list. I love how it's such a hardship to add something to a list. And that going to work is written off as some painless "adventure" where men just have totes fun. Rather than them stressing about how they're going to pay the bills, and provide the food on the table, and pay for schooling and daycare, and college, and deal with workplace drama and stress. Only to come home and wa…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:51 AM
4

Ah this gem. Yes it's me, what should I feed her? This is not about a man being incapable of figuring out how to provide food. It's knowing that if you give your kid just anything, that your wife is going to yell at you "YOU GAVE THEM THIS FOR DINNER?!" This very comic shows this perfectly. After that same picture and complaint, "when we don't do this, our family suffers" shows a picture of a 'bad meal' daddy cooked. They can't help but shit on the method of which men do things. He did it, but h…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:46 AM
4

You can still turn the nozel, it would just be difficult without the handle. You can still open a door without the doornob on it, the mechanics are all still there. It's just hard, because then you'd have to shove your finger in there or find something else to turn it. I think just showing a fresh banana left out of it's peel would be more apt. The peel protects the banana, it keeps it from drying out, as such serves similar function to the foreskin.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:30 AM
3

? The original comment has more upvotes though. This is a bad example of what you're saying.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:22 AM
6

I think this is fairly observable just looking at crowd/fan reactions. I have never seen this level of obsession from boys or men toward any female famous person. And that's from when women were super duper oppressed and stuffs. They literally threw themselves onto a car to try to get at the Beatles. I mean you see a few dudes here and there, but they aren't the ones crying, or throwing themselves on cars.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:19 AM
6

Except they talk about rape culture.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:09 AM
3

Virtue signalling while saying you don't want to be congratulated or praised is some next level shit. You can just live this way without tweeting about it. But then it's not real or something.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:08 PM
-3

"Our lives matter as much as your's does." That's literally what all lives matter is dear. You literally proved my point. And showed the comparison between Christians and BLM to be true. "Because our lives are not specifically designated, that means our lives are not included... in the word all." "You didn't say Merry Christmas to me, I'm offended! How dare you say Happy Holidays, which includes my own celebration!" At NO POINT was the message "Treat black people like they're better than everyon…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 07:02 PM
-1

Of course that would be morally wrong, but that doesn't mean the claims are true. Just as it would be morally wrong to go "you asked for it" to a female rape victim, as feminists often claim happens. But, that doesn't make the claim it happens true. Being awful doesn't make something true. People are afraid to question these claims, because they get accused of being bigots. Does race play a factor? To some degree, but there's so much more to it all. If it's only race, why do white men have highe…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:44 PM
2

Talk to your friend who is “kind of a creep” at work. This is subjective. And I doubt men are friends with men they feel are "kind of a creep" to begin with. Don’t talk over women. Because women never talk over anyone... If you are asked to be on a panel/team and see that it’s all men, say something. Maybe even refuse the spot! Why? When you see another guy talk over a woman, say: “Hey, she was saying something.” Why? Because women are too pathetic and weak to do it themselves? No thanks. I resp…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:56 PM
3

Thank you
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:33 PM
6

Why? I don't agree with some stupid social media campaign where you could make a bot to add to the number of victims, for obvious reasons. But, if you believe it's useful more power to you. The point. If you believe this is helpful, why wouldn't EVERY victim coming forward only HELP the overall conversation? Why is it "just us, stfu everyone else"? Do you really give a shit about helping victims or overcoming a problem if you're excluding half the population from the equation because you only ca…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:15 PM
-1

Which is retarded. BLM, at it's best, is comparable to Christians whining about "Happy Holidays". Sure Christmas is a Holiday, but ours is special and not saying "Merry Christmas" (thus giving me unique attention) is oppression and persecution. Mah War on Christmas. All includes black lives. There's no need for some dumb qualifier unless you're throwing a tantrum. Say "All Lives Matter" and they get offended. "Black lives matter TOO!" No shit, do you know what "all" means? Do Christians know wha…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:04 PM
51

why is it always women's conversations and women's movements that are hijacked BECAUSE THAT'S ALL ANYONE EVER TALKS ABOUT. The very few times MRM attempts to bring it up completely on it's own, feminists start whining about male privilege, rape culture, and the whole gospel they subscribe to. Feminism attempts to make these issues completely gendered. That it's a women's issue, created by men. Which ignores women raped by other women as well. Not just men as victims (regardless of perpetrator). …
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:54 PM
2

Also... this is why the general public don't identify as feminists. It's petty nonsense like this.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:46 PM
6

Welcome to the corporate world. Where the weak get trampled on. Women can just as easily hack it here. By being forceful enough (not bossy [ie; polite way to say bitchy], there is a difference) when they pitch ideas. Some mousey dude whisper talking into his chest about his idea will get rolled over in the same way. Has fuck all to do with gender. It's not personal, it's business. Also, I don't believe these claims at face value anyway. People think their shit is always the best thing in the uni…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:44 PM
4

This is one of those moments you just want to shake somebody and go "THEY'RE TRAINS! TRAAAAIIIINNNNSS!" Even children know they're trains. ffs, so dumb.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:18 AM
2

To murder a child like this, your brain is not functioning properly. It doesn't absolve people of their decisions or wrongdoing to acknowledge this was caused by mental illness. She's still a vile human being. It's not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:09 AM
2

Honestly I'm having a hard time thinking of a women being in the "Background" sexualized though. Usually ads are selling the women, with the product as a secondary thing. It's usually very overt. I think they failed to make this guy (seems like the same one) fall into the background. Granted I'm gay and that guy does everything for me. But, he sticks out far above every woman. It's hard to put sex in the background.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:01 AM
1

To be fair, men (and women too) do react... but not in the way they always imply. Men are not "offended" by it. Men are tired of the hypocrisy involved, so always point it out. Then they file that under "being fragile" when it's really just about demanding equality. If it's okay to do to men, it's okay to do to women. And vise versa. Period. No mental gymnastics to act like it's somehow different when done to women because reasons. Equality begins by shutting up about why it's different and trea…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:53 AM
0

Obviously. This seems more about the children, in a real sense. Rather than about men or women being awful. Since the children are the ones who suffer in the end with BOTH parents abandoning them during/after divorce. It just so happens they started with the man leaving. It wouldn't be any different if you switched it to the woman leaving first. The children are still doomed to fall in the pit. I see no issue with this. Other than the implication that divorce/child abandonment is always selfish …
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:45 AM
1

reality shows where gay men judged women on their outfits (Project Runway,) Come now. That is not what that show was. They were people in the industry who happened to be gay as well.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:30 AM
1

There are rules in some instances, like workplace dress codes, uniforms, school dresscodes. Or social mores (black at a funeral).
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:28 AM
2

A male reporter (or something similar) did this. He wore the same suit for an entire year, and nobody noticed/cared. But his point was to prove how hard women have it because... he's just a white knight, virtue signalling. “I’m judged on my interviews, my appalling sense of humour – on how I do my job, basically,” Stefanovic told the Sydney Morning Herald. “Whereas women are quite often judged on what they’re wearing or how their hair is. Women, they wear the wrong colour and they get pulled up.…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:16 AM
1

This gay mail has 99% graphic t-shirts. I don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 06:07 AM
1

Also, I loved that one video they did about it. All these celebrities, thus successful women admitting that they were called bossy and how that's bad and prevents... success? It's almost like being called bossy has no effect on anything. Unless you cry at the wind changing.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:22 PM
1

Again? Didn't work the first time. How many television shows of the "working man" have bosses who they hate and call assholes, dicks, whatever. A lot. There's a difference between being a good leader/boss and being bossy. If you're being called "bossy" it's more likely that you're bad at your job. Women CAN in fact be bossy. Just as men can be bossy. Maybe have some self reflection. Sometimes it actually is you rather than some massive conspiracy. No wonder girls want to go to boy scouts if this…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:21 PM
3

His comment wasn't edited and it includes this... On the flip side, men fundamentally lack the ability to empathize with women, for the exact same reason.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:07 PM
3

A friend I had as a kid lived next door, and one day we were playing in my backyard and climbing trees or something. We ended up fighting and punching each other (he gave me a better black eye, I'm a pussy~) We apologized to each other after we cooled off, obviously with our parents facilitating as we were in grade school. But things went back to normal almost instantly, I had a black eye and we were hanging out like it wasn't even there. Guy friends are chill.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:04 PM
1

Sounds like the issue is the person, not the game. From your other comments it's an ongoing issue with this guy. I assume it's not all about this game that he freaks out anyway. Maybe he's bipolar or something.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:58 PM
6

EDIT: And don't let anyone tell you different. Saying you love your best friend is not even close to gay I feel like anyone that legitimately has this concern, is suppressing some at minimum bi-curiosity. How is caring about a friend related to sexuality at all? It isn't. A knee jerk "no homo" attitude to normal, non-sexual/romantic things is the gayest thing you could ever do.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:52 PM
2

Most everyone has spilled more than a few drops of coffee on themselves, it doesn’t make them stupid. Shit happens, you don’t deserve to have body parts melted because you spilled coffee. There's a far cry from spilling something while trying to drink it, and opening a cup of hot coffee in your car, between your legs, and then spilling the entire cup on yourself. It was too damn hot. And she was too careless as well. It doesn't have to be either or people. Both parties were absurd.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:35 PM
15

In that case, then girl scouts should be trying harder to appeal to girls who don't want to be in girl scouts and would rather go to BOY scouts. ie; find out what girls want from boy scouts in terms of programs and such, then offer that.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:22 PM
1

The logical answer is to expand what girl scouts offers to compete to keep girls from moving to boy scouts for offering what girl scouts doesn't. Then if that works, include boys if necessary/wanted.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:21 PM
5

Many people were around and nobody said anything. Because your friend is a freshman in college, thus an adult. And there were "many people" around, so nothing was going to actually happen. If an adult can't handle a bad situation, then they will have far more problems than some fool yelling at them from a car. No one would do anything for the same situation happening to a man. Nor should they. So why do you expect the world to save you from an inconvenient asshole? We should expect an ADULT (inc…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:12 PM
1

From "no one" (thus never) to "rarely" within an hour. Love it.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:49 AM
21

Are girl scouts and boy scouts run by the same parent organization(s)? I think it's so weird to just not offer up more options, or at least see if girl scouts members, would like to expand what they are doing to be more similar to boy scouts. I think boys and girls need some time separate from the other gender to just have fun embracing boyhood and girlhood with other boys and girls. Otherwise, just roll both into one and call it Scouts. Then let boys sell cookies and whatever, and girls camp an…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 11:35 AM
1

Do tell. What are the legal consequences?
/r/MensRights11/10/17 07:42 AM
-1

Why are you trying to prove something, but then go on to say "for me"... while trying to still prove you're somehow speaking factually. Pull out method is stupid. Also, without even looking at the link the title says it all. "rivals". So I'm not going to bother. How you can support something that "rivals" condoms, but condemn condoms entirely is beyond me. But I guess the projection of studies vs your feelings is there for a reason.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:43 AM
1

Of course people would appreciate free things... that doesn't matter when we discuss what is, or isn't, "essential".
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:41 AM
0

I agree people need to be responsible when they drink, and know that they are putting themselves at a greater risk of being taken advantage of; and not just with rape, abduction, theft, whatever. But I can't really think of it as anything other than trying to rape somebody when I think about it. But like I said, to me it is. I definitely don't think it's a situation where you can definitively say it is or is not. Because it's kind of a unique situation with gray area.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:12 PM
1

The reporter took it as humurous. Even if it was humorous... who cares? That's not sexism. Did he say "you can't talk about this, get me a man who knows what he's I'm talking about, darling." No. That would actually be sexist, unless slathered with enough sarcasm to make Daria look like a straight talker. It can be humorous to find something so out of the norm. Not "haha, silly women thinking they can talk about sports" but "heh, don't see that every day. What a world."
/r/MensRights08/10/17 10:31 AM
1

How many times has he talked to her? Just because she's been doing it a year, doesn't magically mean that there's 50% women talking about sports now. That just means she, an individual woman, has been doing it a year. And if he's not used to that, it doesn't matter at all. Doesn't change anything. It's just a "heh" observation. Not sexism. Sexism isn't nothing. It's a word that should mean something. Not being about being faux outraged at nothing. I guess my laughing at MYSELF as a gay man, for …
/r/MensRights08/10/17 10:21 AM
3

I didn't know that there was more than one. That sucks, the old design is glorious. I'm not a fan of the butch new design, and the costume is dreadful. At least leave the long hair. :(
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:59 AM
1

This is some off hand story, not an accusation directed at an individual. Would I use this story as an example for women raping men or being predatory? Of course not, but you don't have to take it that seriously when discussing the implications of the story. Taken at face value, this is very clearly a predator looking to take advantage of someone wasted out of their mind. To me, that is very much a rape. It's premeditated at that.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:55 AM
2

Being so used to positive reactions that they grow old and tiresome... forgive me for not caring. It'd be like getting a brand new car every birthday. After awhile, it's just a car. Big woop. So complaining about how you're tired of getting the same ol' thing every year... yeah fuck off. That is a privilege. One she's so used to having that she can act like it's "dangerous" BECAUSE IT ANNOYS HER. It's irrelevant that it would be annoying. That's not what she's saying at all. If she was saying it…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:44 AM
1

Bullshit. If he tried to flex any kind of power like that just over some personal grudge, other people would immediately notice. Others would intervene and he would most likely be fired. I agree. he may have an illusion of power, but being a TSA agent is not being untouchable. I mean the guy you're responding to went on and on about minimal requirements, and lax hiring... all the more reason why it's easy to fire people who cause any public image issue and find someone new. If he misuses that po…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:39 AM
2

As a non-comic book nerd, why did they change her name anyway?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:32 AM
2

What about the women who oppose birth control and abortion? Not sure about the former, but the latter women do more than men! O: So many sexists fighting "against" sexism.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:27 AM
3

Especially in gay bars, by women.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:14 AM
1

Are hygiene products "essential" though? Legitimate question.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:14 AM
2

Well yeah, it's not free for women. Pretty bad plan to charge women anything if you're entire business plan is "attract women to attract men". Best method to do that is to let women in completely free. If you're going to do it, do it right at least.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:13 AM
5

Encouraging the pull out method is stupid as shit. You're like those people who park at in business' parking lot for years, walk across the street and a block away to shop elsewhere for years, then one day get towed and go "but I never had an issue before!" Doesn't make it smart. You had a good run. Precum can get a woman pregnant too.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:10 AM
1

And lessons allow you to have practice, and live advice on how to better improve.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:51 AM
2

That's definitely next level parenting. Most parents don't go to cosmetology course to better do their children's hair. Glad someone pointed it out. Doesn't matter if they're male or female. Most aren't. Women just have more personal experience doing their own hair, so are by default more capable of doing some basic hairdos. This would be like taking sewing lessons so you can make your child's Halloween costumes or make costumes for school plays or something. Most people won't do that for their …
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:48 AM
1

There's really no justification for your idiotic point of view. You seem to be ignoring the fact that a teacher did nothing to actually ensure it stopped. They just said "stop" and the boys didn't. There was no follow through. An actual authority figure DID NOTHING. Expecting a SIX YEAR OLD to go up to every single teacher before something might happen to stop them being assaulted is retarded. And this parent was already prepared to defend their child from getting in trouble. So were aware it ma…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:00 PM
1

Coming from someone that thinks playtime is all day. If your aim is to have the worst argument ever, then you're doing a great job.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:56 PM
2

There's no doubt in my mind she's doing that. If the story is true, we'll say it is for ease, then she's not so subtly implying there's sexual intent on behalf of the boys. She acknowledges her daughter's innocence "She's only 6!" in not knowing what "groping" is. But the kids are around her age, and also wouldn't know. And I feel safe in assuming neither boy is undergoing puberty at the age range of 5-10. Also assuming the story is true, you could say that her daughter didn't even accurately "r…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:06 AM
1

I strongly disagree with your position. She wasn't saying "if they do it again, KICK 'EM IN THE BALLZ GURRRRL POWWWWERRRR" "If they do that tomorrow, you say ‘Keep your hands off of me.’ If they do not stop, you tell the teacher. If they continue to bother you, you turn around and step on their feet, or kick them in the shins or their balls, and if you get in trouble, go ahead and tell your teacher to give me a call.” That's two steps prior to her advocating self defense. And if you tell someone…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:56 AM
3

Yep. The parent should have immediately called the school when she learned the teacher saying "stop" had no follow through when the boys didn't stop. Assuming everything is true for the sake of argument. Then go to the principle if the teacher is worthless, and keep making a stink and going higher up until they actually do their fucking jobs. I didn't have an overall issue with some of the article, it does mention that boys and girls should keep their hands to themselves. And she still didn't ju…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:49 AM
6

"Why I gave my son permission to cunt punt your daughter".
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:40 AM
1

This is very much abusive behavior from the parent. This goes beyond, "you'll finish your cello lessons!" or "You're going to try these things". I'm going to turn my alphabet belcher into a proud princess whether he likes it or not This is a parent taking it upon themselves to deny their child a personality of their own. They want to shape their child to be exactly what they want them to be. Nothing short of a "princess" will suffice. No matter what, she will push for this. Even though her son's…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:17 AM
2

No means no, dear. But as I watch my son reject flowers and dolls and even pink Popsicles – all things that until, very recently, he adored – on the grounds that they are “girlish,” I have come to see Fine’s point. There is something inherently sexist, even covertly misogynist, in the way we discourage boys away from pretty things while telling girls they can have it all. What a fucking idiot. He's three years old, he doesn't know anything. That's why you just explain to him that "eating a pink …
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:13 AM
2

Discrimination? Against a male? Oh you.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:10 AM
1

Based on what? I've seen plenty of times where there are tons of pro-choice MRAs and those who are endlessly droning on about the importance of life at conception get downvoted into oblivion. That's far more common in my experience. And I've been coming here for years. Personally, though I consider myself egalitarian, I dislike how abortion is treated like a birth control option. It shouldn't be considered one. I'm pro-choice, but I think it should be an absolute last resort. And it should be tr…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:01 AM
2

"One of the priorities has already been a prompt, equitable and fair process for those accused of sexual violence and the victims," said Valerie Simons, the college's Title IX coordinator and executive director of the Boulder campus' Office of Institutional Equity and Compliance. "There will be no immediate changes to either our sexual misconduct policy or our OIEC policy." And that's the problem right there. The accused may be referred to as "accused", but the accuser is referred to as "a victi…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:38 AM
1

Is it the one where the judge ignored the victim's statement that he didn't want to do it, (forget the exact wording, but I want to say it was something like "It felt wrong" or "I knew it was wrong") which contradicts the father's claim that his son is "advanced" and a "lady killer" or whatever retarded bullshit it was. Story pisses me off. What a worthless parent, and worthless judge... I think that's the same story where they actually treated the rapist female like she was "emotionally immatur…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:24 AM
1

They know. They were answering the rhetorical question. It's very simple, and it's what they said. It's not better. That and barely anyone would actually choose to take a knife to their penis or vagina. So you gotta force it at infancy, or through very strict social/cultural/religious means.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:18 AM
1

Or when you go to school, or church, or to a family get together, a funeral, etc....
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:12 AM
2

I think they're saying that originally that's what being politically correct would be. To have some decorum when out in public. Obviously now people just associate hyper-sensitivity with political correctness. And I think the person you were responding to, would rather people call it "psychotic" or something else. Rather than continue to taint "PC" with it. But it's too late for that me thinks
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:09 AM
2

Well, the entire thing is done because they feel like it's a problem that it's mostly men doing it on their own... If they want to encourage others to ride, they should just promote to them. Without excluding those who already do it (ie; men). I'm taking the claim at face value, thus accurate. How will this lead to them riding when mostly men are doing it? It'll just make them all the more uncomfortable to ride outside of this group's organized "ew, men have cooties" events. How is them particip…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:04 AM
1

It's sarcasm based in truth, not a strawman. A lot of people downplay female violence. Hell, women smacking their boyfriend/husband in public is amusing and not seen as the domestic abuse it actually is. Let's not forget the people (extreme feminists) who love to act like if women ran the world there'd be no wars, and that all the bad things in the world are because of men.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 05:57 AM
1

No matter how polite you are, criticism of feminism will be painted as hatred of women. So good luck. They want all criticism labeled as hatred of women so they can shut down criticism of their ideology and so nobody listens to "women hating, virgin, neckbeards, straight, white cis, blah blah". Just stick to the facts and prepare to be treated like a misogynist no matter what you say.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 08:37 PM
2

I'm independent. I'm wholly opposed to the party system.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 11:55 PM
1

Yes they do when all factors are the same. But that doesn't mean the earnings gap information is wrong, it's not. It's correct. It's just useless information. The only one making it political is you but denying facts to support your own position. You can acknowledge the reality of the earnings gap, and acknowledge that that information is fucking worthless. Yet you want to deny it for no reason. I'm not buying into shit. I don't even think you read my comment. So I won't bother with you any more…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:16 AM
1

The last one just applies to reddit as a platform. The others are stupid.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:51 PM
1

they're often forced to make a choice between their career and their children. lol, no they aren't. The falsehood that "YOU CAN HAVE IT ALL LADIES" is all that is pushed in society these days. Hell choosing just motherhood gets you treated poorly by feminists. Except you can't. Men are so successful, largely when they sacrifice time with their family. You can have a balance of both, but you probably won't excel at your career if you spend meaningful time at home. Because there are going to be pe…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:45 PM
0

The stats of the "wage gap" are true though. It's not a result of discrimination at all however, which is how it's often framed so people are lied to without being directly lied to. "Women deserve to be paid the same for the same work." pause for plausible deniability "Women make $0.77 blah blah blah" They aren't SAYING the second thing is due to discrimination, but they framed it so people take on the information that way. It's an EARNINGS GAP. And it's real, it's just not an actual issue. Sinc…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:35 PM
2

24/7 free labour So she pays rent? Buys her own food? It's not free labor. It's an exchange.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:27 PM
1

I don't think he should have to support her for life after a divorce but she does deserve something for doing that. You mean, like room and board? Last I knew, living ain't free. I mean, maybe you live in Fairy Fart land where rent is free, food is free, utilities are free.. but back in the real world those things have VALUE. If she wants him to pay for her, she should also be expected to pay him rent, buy her own food, etc. THAT is equality. Both positions are providing something. Both are gett…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:25 PM
2

How can he possibly think that a full-time live in nanny/maid should only be paid room and board? When her IQ is one in a quarter million and she attended the same ivy league school he did? It pains me. If he's worth a few million, then it'd be pretty nice room and board. And you don't need your live-in maid to be intelligent, she just needs to be good at her job. And going to an ivy league school doesn't help you clean toilets any better.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:20 PM
2

With how you put it, didn't read the entire thing yet so not sure if it's an accurate way to put it, it reminds me of an article I read that proposed "whoever asks someone out should be the one to pay!" Wow, how generous and progressive of you. It's not like men are still socially expected to do that so it still amounts to men having to pay for dates entirely. It sounds fair if you don't think about it at all.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:17 PM
1

I wouldn't call DRIVING a basic human right.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:11 PM
1

the KSA system IS oppressive, but it is so for both men and women. MRAs say this all the time about third world countries. Where have you been?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:11 PM
1

That has little to do with men's rights. So I hope you don't let that comment represent the sub, and don't get me wrong the sub has it's problems. Point is some people, regardless of leanings any which way, vehemently hate those who harm children. I'll just toss the example of what happens to child abusers/molesters in prisons. Even the criminal find it unacceptable, to the point the feel compelled to issue their own brand of "justice". So it's not that surprising to see a comment like that on a…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:14 PM
1

How this hating women? I like that half the argument for why this doesn't belong here amounts to "It's just two nuts, why is this here?" But with you, suddenly it's all women, and so it being posted here means it's hating women? I'm honestly not even sure what mental hoops you've jumped through to get "hating women" from it being posted here at all. Acknowledging two awful people abusing a child, who happen to be women, is hating women?
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:07 PM
1

Yet still hold a lot of sway in media, education and government. All in the guise of "helping women" often from "men". Showing that women are also capable of bad things, fighting against the "Women are wonderful" effect directly benefits men. Then people will see that domestic violence... is not a "women's issue". That rape is not a "women's issue". etc Whether you think that qualifies as "Men's Rights" or not, is up to you honestly. But it's arguable to me. And I think as long as people point o…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:05 PM
7

Also, even if women did prefer it... who the fuck cares? I'd rather men look at those women and go "Well, bye then." and find someone who isn't a shallow douchebag. Having a preference is fine, until you start using it to justify ritual mutilation of infant boy's genitals.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 03:54 PM
13

This is more retarded than I could have ever imagined, and I didn't even read all of it because my brain can't handle this amount of stupidity. The idea that the foreskin is more sensitive stems from a 2007 study that measured response to light touch; this study found that "the glans [or the head] of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis." When testing the same metric, Bossio's study also found that the foreskin was indeed more sensitive.…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 03:16 PM
2

I think you picked the wrong word there.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:38 AM
1

Women suffering at the hands of other women is completely ignored from what I've seen. How on earth would you rank that 2? Never have I seen lesbian relationships discussed by feminists, or female pedophiles who rape girls. They don't even acknowledge females as perpetrators, since the foundation of everything they believe is "men are evil perpetrators, women are helpless victims". Look at that horrible "actress" who wrote a book, I won't circulate her name, and admitted to molesting her sister …
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:57 PM
1

I don't think child support makes sense as it is. If full custody is in one parent's hands, it should be the one taking financial responsibility. As it used to be before Tender Years Doctrine bullshit. It's like paying for a car you never get to use, but someone else does. Why does that make sense? Obviously a child isn't a car, but you get the idea. Which kind of plays into the overall question of parental responsibility of men if they don't want the child at all. If a man makes it clear that h…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:47 PM
2

STDs dear, and she blackmailed this guy, why wouldn't she do the same to you?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:35 PM
1

An internet comic being oversimplified and wrong. I'm shocked. Truly.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:12 PM
1

I'm skeptical.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:59 PM
1

The glamorous "middle class" or even lower class on television always makes me laugh.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:16 PM
1

Only Americans are passionate about what they do? Why do people always make everything about America? May as well be a feminists if you want to hurl out useless terms all day. You get more variety then. There's a difference between working and doing something for fun in the same wheelhouse as your career. For example, you're a writer. So let's say you're working on a novel. To blow off steam, you write short stories about something completely separate from what your job is. Because you enjoy the…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:01 PM
3

Im not sure why unloading your personal baggage onto random men at a breakfast table first thing Monday morning is a womans idea of a good conversation. Yeah, I mean the concert part alone might get a different response. But going on about your baggage is going to leave a lot of men in a stunned silence hoping for a hole to form in the Earth below them and swallow them up.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 01:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter