TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ExpendableOne Archive

View 5 posts and 5,097 comments by ExpendableOne on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,097 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Their body, their choice is referring to the act of the woman having to the carry the child. Something the man cannot do This is a very convenient distinction that people would make because it benefits women. But the argument of "their body, their choice", taken at face value, extends beyond just the carrying of the child itself. The argument of "their body, their choice" should include the physical toll of child-birth itself but certainly shouldn't be limited to it. In the majority of the cases…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 05:09 PM
5

People do not really respect the mantra of "their body, their choice", when it comes to men, in pretty much every sense of the word. His DNA is "his body" and it is his biological/physiological property. It should be respected just like any other form of property law(intellectual, physical, financial, etc). Using someone's DNA for something they did not consent to shouldn't just be trivialized. Using someone's DNA without their knowledge/consent to falsify a crime scene or steal someone's identi…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:05 PM
2

Another big difference here too, I think, is that men who call women "sluts" or "whores" would also get both major support and major lash-back from women as well(which simultaneously also explains why a lot of men wouldn't judge women this way on social media and why some men would stand to gain by doing so); where as women who call other women "sluts" and "whores" on social media wouldn't really face any kind of real repercussions. They are not really held accountable for the posts the way men …
/r/MensRights07/10/19 03:58 PM
5

A lot of women still see their own income as the "minimum entry wage" that a man must earn to even be considered romantically eligible, if not to even be considered a real human being by their standards. You can't make less than them because then you're not worthy of them. You can't make more than them and expect them to keep working, because they expect you to maintain that income and way of life even if they choose to stop(whether it's to "reinvent themselves" or have children). You can't make…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 02:19 PM
2

Anything that benefits women, feminists will present as sexism against women. Anything the detriments women, feminists will present as sexism against women(even when there are caveats associated with the circumstances). Anything that is equal between men and women, or entirely inconsequential, feminists will present as sexism against women. Feminism will present everything as sexism against women, because that is how it has justified its own existence for decades(and, actually a pretty successfu…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:06 AM
1

you are not "pinned" if you are free to move wherever you want. You delusional child don't be a hateful bigot, elevators are for everyone don't pretend to claim yourself a victim of a crime that hasn't and will not happen, especially when you outnumber the man(she said women, not woman) don't expect men to "call out" other men for failing to live up to your delusional bigoted expectation.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:02 AM
4

I mean, at the end of the day, women are still responsible for who, when and how they choose to date. Even if this is true, and women choose to avoid fertile men because men are too reliable/nice(i.e. boring/predictable) or too inexperienced, how wouldn't they only have themselves to blame? If they are on their own biological clocks, are aren't they to blame for choosing to have children later in their lives, with older men?
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:57 AM
1

This story seems very incredibly fishy to me. I also find this guy's use of social media incredibly disturbing and distasteful. He basically seems to be using the death of his son, or the judge's/court's decision, to promote his profile/pictures. It's really weird. Like, if you're going to make a post about the judge/courts, or the death of your son, you really don't need to do it with a picture of you posing and modelling to conceptualize what you're saying too. From what I've seen so far, does…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:33 PM
2

Never mind the fact that there are surely plenty of men out there who are struggling for even the most basic of female attention in the dating world, who do have their shit together(or, at least, have decent jobs) and who are getting rejected over the most mundane, idiotic, toxic, sexist and superficial reasoning(like, he's an inch too short, his zodiac sign doesn't match what I'm "compatible with", I don't like the car he drives, he's too nice, he's too boring, he doesn't want to pay my bills, …
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:55 PM
17

Men: We don't feel safe, welcomed or comfortable in a socially sanctioned hostile work environment that demonizes us for our gender. Feminist: Ha! you're just mad, bro!
/r/MensRights30/08/19 04:14 PM
2

I mean... data seems to indicate that most women have an exceptionally low regard towards most of the male gender, so what's the problem? And, if he did have a generally low regard for the female gender, based on what he considers to be good or bad qualities, are we certain that this view couldn't be justified? At best, it's entirely subjective and his "personal preference"(which would be far more "personal" than what a lot of women consider "personal preference"). At worse, there could be legit…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:31 PM
15

Sooner or later, I think people will have to come to the realization that the way we treat men, compared to women, likely has a very strong impact and correlation on MtF gender identity disorders(which are far more prevalent than FtM cases). How many boys grow up internalizing the feeling that they are not accepted, wanted, welcomed or desired, because they are boys, or that they would be more accepted, wanted, welcomed and desired as girls? How many boys grow up internalizing a lack of belongin…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:29 PM
2

How are healthcare providers shaming you specifically? Seems like they should know better. As for family members, let them think whatever they want. They want to act like they know best despite a clear ignorance and personal bias on the matter. Whatever they think they know about circumcision is clearly wrong and your son's penis shouldn't really be their business(this is just my personal opinion but you should probably not get into the habit of divulging intimate and embarrassing details about …
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:14 PM
2

I don't think it's fair to just say that men don't want to have kids. Not just because I know a lot of men who want to have kids, and who would make awesome fathers but will likely never really be given the chance/opportunity to be fathers(mainly due to hypergamy and persistent entitlements/expectations from women towards men), but because there are also more and more women who do not want to have children either(mostly because they don't want to go through the physiological strain of childbirth…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 06:05 PM
39

She wouldn't even have to be changing. If a man was caught taking a picture of a woman in public, just because he thought she was cute, he would be regarded as a creep and possibly lynched. The cops/security would probably be called on him and a hashtag would be started about the vile of men and the male gaze. It would be used as proof/evidence by feminists and misandric women to argue the false narrative that women are unsafe everywhere and subjugated/objectified by men.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 05:14 PM
9

"the patriarchy made her do this" -feminists
/r/MensRights21/08/19 05:18 PM
9

"AITA" is an incredibly shitty sexist place. Every post there could be used as an example of "people would react to this very differently if the genders were reversed". Gender is often used as a prominent determining factor even when it isn't relevant, or dismissed when it is relevant(typically in situation that disadvantage men).
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:24 PM
4

Most incels do not hate women, at all. You could argue that they are jaded by the way women systematically mistreat and judge them, if not quite literally because of prominent gender roles, but it also wouldn't affect them so intimately if they just hated women. Incels love, desire and want women in their lives and, if anything, would pedestalize women because they are so deprived of female attention. PUA may not "hate women" either but they don't really see them as full individuals either. Just…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:17 PM
9

I've never met a single man who didn't like or appreciate being approached by women. I have met a LOT of women who just made it obvious that they never wanted to approach men, felt very entitled to the idea that they should never be expected to approach men, and would not want to date men who would want/prefer women to approach them(judging men quite harshly for something women do every day).
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:12 PM
3

Men have never been "intimidated" by educated, rich or successful women, it has always been women who used their own level of education, income or success as a means of gatekeeping. A disturbing amount of women do not see their accomplishments as a means of freedom or a personal responsibility, they see it as the minimum level requirement that men must match to date them(a factor of hypergamy or, maybe more appropriately, toxic femininity). The more accomplished women become, the more likely the…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:09 PM
2

porn addicts Are they addicts or do they just watch porn? Either way, that certainly seems like something that's entirely manageable. Kind of fucked view to have towards their sexuality or sexual autonomy. "Sensitive" guys you have to perform constant emotional labour for Do you mean just being nice to them? Or just demonstrating basic human empathy? What is constant emotional labour, besides something that men have also historically been expected to do for women for ages now. Narcissistic(if no…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 05:30 PM
3

People have justified far more toxic shit under the guise of "girls will be girls" than under the guise of "boys will be boys". The expressions are typically different(like "women, can't live with them, can't live without them", "that's the way life goes", "bitches be crazy!" or "don't stick your dick in crazy", typically to blame the vicim) but the attitudes are pretty much the same. People are typically very quick to ignore, legitimize and defend bad behaviour from women, because they are wome…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:51 PM
1

Honestly, this mindset that you often see from women of "he should take a hint" or "he made me uncomfortable by talking to or questioning me, and he should have known this" are both incredibly horrid, petty, destructive, condescending and delusional mindsets(arguably "toxic femininity"). This is especially troublesome when that "discomfort" is driven by prejudice(hostility or disdain towards basic male heterosexuality or romantic interest from men) or discrimination(whether it's based on gender,…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:20 PM
1

Out of all the women I have ever met, very few actually carried such weapons and even fewer even knew how to use them properly. You can go to any gym, have a quick look around, and very quickly realize that not only are women there in a minority but that most of the ones who are there aren't interested in getting stronger(women in gyms tend to favour ellipticals and running machines). You can also go to any type of martial arts facility, from a traditional dojo to more practical/sports gyms, and…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 02:44 PM
10

I think most men understand that women are far more privileged than they could ever dream to be but they just accept it. Not just because there's nothing they can really do about it(there is no scenario in which a man could just call women out on their privileges and not come out unscathed, he would very quickly find himself very replaced, lonely and demonized. It's also a systematic issue that needs to be addressed on a federal, if not global, level) but because they themselves are just as much…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 02:21 PM
167

That's because: a) women benefit from far more social and interpersonal systematic privileges, because they are women, which gives them better moral/financial/emotional support, better agency over their own lives and others, and less accountability for their mistakes and fewer reasons to fall into despair. b) women are not expected to be competent fighters and protectors(most women don't even feel they should put ANY effort in learning how to defend themselves or practice common sense), and are …
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:58 PM
1

I think there are certainly plenty of men who think women are worth the risk but feel kind of helpless in that context or feel like they can't really do anything about it in the moment. You could run into a girl, and desperately want to talk to her or build some kind of relation, but if she is already negatively predisposed towards you, and your first instinct is to pick up on that and respond to that lack of interest(or, in some circumstances, aversion, hatred, fear or disdain), you're just not…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 02:45 PM
1

There's plenty of centrist and left-leaning men in "MRA/MGTOW/Incels" groups too.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 04:03 PM
2

There are a lot of nerdy men with varying degrees of social difficulties, that a lot of women will ridicule and harass(which could also be considered to be a lack of social skills on their part), who aren't on any kind of autism spectrum. The statement that "most nerds are autistic" seems pretty wrong to me, if not just trying to dismiss the problem in a very underhanded way(perhaps even justifying the way women will treat them). A lot of "nerds" have social difficulties for very normal reasons,…
/r/MensRights06/08/19 03:51 PM
6

Incels exist because we live in a society that overwhelmingly benefits, pedestalizes and privileges women when it comes to sex, romance and dating(which, in turn, trickles down to every other aspect of human civilization). Incels exist because we live in a society that still overwhelmingly penalizes and belittles men for not falling under strict and narrow gender roles placed on men(Something which feminism has empowered women to enforce those roles onto men, further perpetuating pre-existing as…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 04:04 PM
1

I think feminism is too strongly rooted in misandry, partiality and irrationality for it to be compatible with any egalitarian movement. You can support women's rights and men's rights, or support human rights for both genders, but feminism as a movement and as an ideology is inherently corrupt and misguided/misinformed at its core.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:44 PM
6

I wonder, after all these superhero movies featuring all-female casts come out, will Disney/Marvel be looking to start rolling out movies that deliberately and exclusively feature/promote only men, because they are men, to balance out some imaginary scale? Will their actors proudly state "the future is male!" at that point to promote those movies too?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:35 PM
3

Not only is this completely wrong/false, but it's literally just more of the same type of mentality that brought us "toxic masculinity" in the first place. Most "weak" men do not abuse women, and there are certainly a lot of "strong" men who do. Belittling and vilifying men to don't live up to some personalized standard of masculinity is exactly what the concept of "toxic masculinity" aims to do.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:27 PM
2

I don't understand why this person couldn't have just been able to relate to men without having to date other women. Like, she should be able to conceptualize these issues without experiencing them first hand(especially considering that she admitted herself that she was doing those things). This seems like a rich person experiencing poverty for a week and then saying "omg, I never really understood why being poor was so hard! This changed my entire outlook on life!", and then just going back to …
/r/MensRights22/07/19 02:48 PM
18

It's lonely at the top I literally couldn't think of a more conceited sentence for a woman to make, in order to try to paint herself as a victim of her own power and privilege. It is not lonely, you have your pick of anyone. You just choose to discriminate on all kinds of fucked up reasons(choosing not to see men as equals). You also have the power to change things, in so many ways, but choose not to(choosing instead to blame men, who are not in a position of power, to further victimize yourself…
/r/MensRights21/07/19 03:46 PM
29

That's the weird part. Law-abiding men, who could be in a position of being a "good Samaritan", either calling for help or intervening directly would follow directives(even as they directly discriminate against them), reducing their chances of being there. Law-disregarding men, who are looking for women to rape, wouldn't care about a stupid sign to begin with(if anything, it might just piss them off even more or make them feel justified in their action because they see their violence as a correc…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 09:59 PM
2

Systematic hatred of men is an integrated aspect of our society. The two are relatable not just on that fact but on the basis that it is discrimination on the basis of a biological trait. Slavery also doesn't just establish that all other forms of racism, or all other forms of discrimination/apartheid, don't matter either.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 09:52 PM
4

The vast majority of women who hit men, do so with the knowledge or assumption that those men will not hit back. A fact that many of them will often even flaunt to their face as they are assaulting them. That is a form of power, and privilege, that they are both abusing and flaunting. Imposing and affirming that privilege onto men is probably something that abusive women feel empowered by. When a woman gets away with hitting a man, it also creates a self-reinforcing psychological reward as well,…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:15 PM
17

It's not just an emotional blow, it's a physical blow(men's muscles don't make them immune to injury or harm), it's a social blow(when a woman hits a man, people not only assume that he's in the wrong but it also emasculate him to all his peers), and it's a psychological blow(bringing back all kinds of abuse they have likely suffered as men throughout their lives). It's also taking advantage of the fact that men are mostly powerless to fight back against their abusers when their abusers are wome…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:24 AM
3

Women who don't get why men would generally be uncomfortable with the idea of a knife going anywhere near their gonads, seem like complete sociopaths to me. It seems like a very severe lack in empathy and general biological and social awareness/understanding. Ignoring the possible threat of medical complications, or the fear of such complications(which should be understandable, given the sensitive nature of gonads and how everything a man could be and would live for necessitates their existence)…
/r/MensRights16/07/19 04:57 PM
11

I wonder if this could be qualified as a form of "women-spreading" and "toxic feminity". If the genders were reversed, that's how feminists would be framing it.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 01:53 PM
2

Gender neutral washrooms would fix this problem but that would require women to share spaces with men they typically see as scary, dirty, perverted or beneath them(typically all at the same time). Alternatively, female urinals could be standardized but it is very unlikely that most women would accept/embrace them. Ultimately, it really falls to women to practice some agency and not only make a stronger effort to be faster and mindful of other people's time. It would also probably help a lot if w…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 01:40 PM
27

It's not just misinformation, it's textbook character assassination/slander. This is a very common tactic by feminists and women who seek to vilify men, and gain social support through false helplessness. She knows there would be nothing fear from men's rights activists, but wrongfully acting as though they are dangerous or as if her safety was threatened in any way, immediately paints them as something to be removed. Her being a woman, and therefore socially privileged as a protected class, giv…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 03:01 PM
34

The odds of a guy performing any kind of sexual misconduct in a public setting would be incredibly low, his odds of getting away with it would be even lower, and the punishment for it would be very severe. The odds of a woman lying about sexual misconduct would be relatively higher, the odds of her getting away with it would be almost 100% and the punishment she would face if caught lying would be virtually nil. Women are practically incentivized to lie, because they have plenty to gain and very…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 02:09 PM
44

This boy's fears seem far more realistic than the idea that girls write blogs saying "dear blog, cute boy on train still ignoring me", especially considering how many women have demonstrated having an incredibly apathetic, if not downright hostile/hateful, predisposition towards heterosexual male attention(both online and offline). Reddit alone is full of "this boy came on to me, and that offends me; he was a creep/entitled for approaching me; and it made me feel unsafe" threads. It's also funny…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:58 PM
7

It's always been pretty clear to me that many, if not most, female gamers are far more sexist than your average male gamers. You see it on reddit all the time, grown women trying to victimize themselves because they received male attention; all the while glorifying attention from other women themselves(especially blatant when you look at "female only" subs like girl gamers which is deliberately discriminative) or demonstrating the exact same time of attention seeking behaviour(basically jumping …
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:20 PM
9

It's crazy how men have historically been shamed, belittled and virgin shamed, predominantly by women, for doing this despite the fact that there were clear social pressures push on them, from a very young age, to so. Men were labelled as meek, unassertive, unmasculine and insecure for not firmly gripping women, despite the majority of men growing up at a time where they were told that they are chauvinistic pigs, sexual harassers/abusers and female objectifiers for even thinking about women, let…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 03:29 AM
-1

That physical strength doesn't just come from testosterone. Men literally train to have that physical strength and to be physically capable, specifically because they would be expected to physically put themselves in harms way in all kinds of situations, including protecting women from other men. Women have the capability and accessibility to all kinds of ways to train and make themselves stronger and more physically capable, most of them choose not to do so. Compare the number of women who are …
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:58 AM
2

is it really hard not to be creepy Maybe there is a problem with how and what women define as creepy, and how this term only and explicitly against men(often for doing, thinking or feeling things that are entirely natural/normal or that women do all the time without punishment or vilification)
/r/MensRights10/06/19 10:11 PM
1

White-knights are just a product of gynocentrism, standardized male bashing(or male-guilt being forced onto young boys), and a heavily female-favoured sexual market. I can't really blame them for being desperate for female attention/approval, anymore than I can blame a child born on the wrong side of a class/poverty divide.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 03:17 PM
34

The worse part to me, is that the trope of women hitting/grabbing/crushing a guy's balls is deliberately employed and popularized because it is a form of emasculation and sexual assault. This picture tries to compare this to a man hitting a woman in the throat/face, but it isn't really the same. A woman hitting a man in the face is comparable to a man hitting a woman in the face. A woman targeting a man's genitals, especially in the context of gratuitous/vindictive violence, is comparable a man …
/r/MensRights07/06/19 06:38 PM
71

Willful ignorance of male physiology and a disgust/disdain for male biology/sexuality. Sounds like toxic femininity to me.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:39 PM
1

There are so many common trends and beliefs shared by contemporary women, that could be described as "contemporary femininity" and are ignorant, spiteful, indifferent, narcissistic, entitled, destructive, hateful, harmful, bigoted and/or discriminatory. There are so many more aspects of femininity that should be recognized as "toxic", if not outright sociopathic, than there is with masculinity. Most of it just in how they view and treat men.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:00 PM
5

As if the APA wasn't enough of a joke already.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:52 PM
3

As twitter, twoXC and askWomen easily demonstrate, the way a lot of women think can be pretty horrifying too, especially when they get together to rationalize, legitimize and justify their own radicalized, sociopathic and bigoted thinking among themselves(and, no one questions or objects to them because they are women, and offering any kind of differing point of view/experience is discarded as "derailing").
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:43 PM
5

I don't really like how this diminishes the impact that women have on men. It's not just "some men don't get laid". Women going on a "sex strike" would actually have a pretty significant effect on a lot of men. Even the idea that women would want or think to go on a "sex strike" on men would have an emotional and personal impact on men. Sex is source of comfort and validation for both men and women, and most men are already pretty starved of it. Even the idea of a sex strike has so many negative…
/r/MensRights29/05/19 02:12 PM
24

Men do not choose celibacy, women dictate the celibacy of men. The idea that men "choose" to be celibate is, at best, a petty attempt to save face and, at worse, a very disturbing twisting of reality seeking to place blame on men for something that is not only out of their control but that is also culturally held against them in countless other ways and used to dehumanize/desexualize them. Liking video games doesn't mean that a guy doesn't want sex/love, but the implication that men who like vid…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:57 PM
1

Adderall is for adhd, not for something that is related to gender or physical strength/fitness.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:49 PM
1

Political correctness over gender identity disorders, and the way activists for a mental disorder has shoe horned itself into a movement for sexual orientation activism, created a pretty disturbing reality and contradicts virtually every basic fundamentals of gender equality. Gender identity disorders are not something that should be glorified, politicized or radicalized(especially not when it's driven by a learnt social disdain, shame or resentment to one's own gender, which is already cultural…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:48 PM
2

Color recognition is a major advantage in FPS games. Spotting people before they spot you is pretty good.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:36 PM
3

This is also why, as we all know, there are no unhealthy or overweight men in e-sports. Steroids and testosterone enhancers are also a major problem in the e-sports community, which is why all the major tournament providers do regular drug tests on all their competitors.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:34 PM
2

Nice guy is usually used negatively particularly by women and this is just being spun around to point out that male feminists especially and people who try to attack men over defending themselves are going to be nice guys themselves trying to get laid. "nice guys" are your typical average guys, and generally honest men. The negative term has been coopted by women, and subsequently the feminist movement, as a way to belittle, slander, vilify or even radicalize heterosexual men for being male and …
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:55 PM
10

That's not "nice guy mentality", nice guys would just help her up or try to talk him down, and then be labelled a coward or a meek/unmasculine man because he didn't turn into a brute enforcer for her or commit a crime at her behest(which would just end up getting him rejected or delegitimized, and openly frustrated by what was expected of him in the first place). The truth of the matter is that women generally do reward this type of overt violent behaviour from men, specifically towards other me…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:02 PM
38

I can't even imagine any other context in which this type of response would be acceptable. Imagine it was a bigger woman pushing that woman, and three people(men or women) just unloaded on her the way they did to that guy. It just wouldn't happen, regardless of circumstance. At the very least, those people would spend the rest of their days in jail for attempted murder.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 01:57 PM
2

I can't tell if she's being ironic or just ignorant. You could literally make the exact argument she's making about abortion. "Any woman who is anti-abortion should exercise her rights by abstaining immediately completely and indefinitely". She's literally taking a pro-life stance, only with men. She's basically solved this entire debate for herself, just give women the same reproductive rights that men have. There you go.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:29 AM
2

It drives me nuts when I see feminist try to make this point, because it just demonstrates that they don't know the difference between aggressiveness/condescension and assertiveness. Usually, it's coming from women who are trying to legitimize or justify poor behaviour or a lack of awareness(which could also be a result of lacking social skills in certain situations). Women can be assertive without being aggressive, condescending or "bossy" but a lot of them don't really see the difference betwe…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 02:57 PM
2

I don't even think it's really that much of a matter of "nerdy men being on the spectrum", as in an innate quality that made them predisposed to being in tech or being socially disadvantaged. This also implies that most nerdy men are some kind of byproduct of a genetic anomaly or defect. The way I see it, this is far more of a nurture problem than a nature one. There are many boys who just develop a natural affinity/interest for math and science very early on, and who will just be isolated and b…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 01:55 PM
2

Toxic masculinity has left a generation of straight men stranded on emotionally-stunted island It's not toxic masculinity who has left a generation of straight men stranded on emotionally-stunted islands, it's hypergamy(men feeling worthless as they are surrounded by women who see themselves above them), it's male vilification(men feeling unable to approach/connect with women around them, because they are afraid of scaring them or having the worse assumed about them), it's toxic femininity(men f…
/r/MensRights03/05/19 07:35 PM
3

It's crazy that the notion of "boys will be boys" gets so attention, when it is typically just used to justify either basic male heterosexuality, roughhousing or tomfoolery. Meanwhile the level of sheer sociopathic shit that women get away with because "girls will be girls"(or even "bitches be crazy") is miles beyond anything men could ever get away with for being men.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:41 PM
4

But it is. The Braincel subreddit is full of men who want to imprison women as sex slaves, or simply hate the female gender. This is despicable, and ought not to be tolerated. You are honestly destroying a lot of your own credibility when you start off with shit like this. The braincels subreddit is not full of men who want to make women sex slaves. This view isn't just ignorant/insane, it's also entirely derogatory towards anyone who's involved with that subreddit. Incel subreddits exist becaus…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:12 PM
5

It's insane how these people condescendingly rationalize this shit. "it's part of their job" is not a good validation for this argument, because then it would also be "part of their job" for female athletes to allow male interviewers in locker rooms. And, no, it's not actually "part of their job". Their job is to play a sport and put their best into it. That's it. It's not their job to be interviewed in a locker room and, even if it was, it shouldn't just be assumed that they consented to a fema…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:07 PM
6

"it’s all those women he can’t measure up to." Could you be any more pretentious and conceited? Just because a woman think's she's better than a guy, any guy, doesn't actually mean she is. She has an incredibly misandric and chauvinistic view of people.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 05:53 PM
15

That one video pretty much gives me a pretty strong indication that she is not only incredibly unstable and vindictive, but also the type of person who could and would easily lie about assault as a means of manipulation. Her demeanour is not the demeanour of someone who is afraid of physical assault(laughing at his face, aggressively getting in his face, insulting him, provoking him, etc). She is acting like your typical "I am untouchable" female sociopathic bully.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:53 PM
1

There is no difference, both are advances from people who have something to offer you that you aren't interested in.Even try to make it sound worse than it is, it still sounds pretty pathetic. Also, "undesirable" is entirely subjective.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:51 PM
0

I think the case is that they want boy scouts to accept girls(because if they don't it's sexist against women) while also trying to reserve the right to reject boys from the girl scouts(because girls need safe places). It's pretty typical MO for feminists.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 09:14 PM
1

I get junk mail every day, against my explicit consent. I just throw it in the garbage and move on. Grow up.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 09:12 PM
11

This is kind of more of an example of how a girl can abuse her social privilege, as a girl, to very easily slander, vilify and socially ostracize a guy. It didn't really matter what he did, all that mattered was that she expressed a negative response towards him for everyone to follow suit. If she had been okay with him not pulling girl's hair, they would have all been okay with it too. This is also an example of how a woman can abuse labels, like sexist, to justify misandry and bullying a guy w…
/r/MensRights07/11/18 09:08 PM
20

Whats weird to me is that, even if he had been the one to smack her ass, that still wouldn't justify her assaulting him. Like, could you imagine if a woman had slapped a guy's ass and he just turns around and chokes her out? Would anyone find this an appropriate or justified response? No, no one would. And you know the only reason this video came up was in this guy's defense too, because if it wasn't there everyone would be fine with this guy getting choked out.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 03:30 AM
1

You don't need consent to write a letter. You are free to write anything you want to write on a piece of paper. You are free to express yourself about anyone, regardless of how those people feel about it. It's called free speech, if not literally free thoughts/emotions. It is insane that you believe that people, or women specifically, would have the legal right to criminalize these things, if not specifically criminalize men because they are men. Boundaries are also entirely subjective, even wit…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 06:34 PM
3

Unsolicited notes/letters/attention from a nine year old isn't a crime, it shouldn't even be a crime period unless you want to start treating all unsolicited attention or advertising as a crime. People are allowed to have their feelings, and they should be allowed to express those feelings. It's insane that people would attempt to criminalize desire, specifically/uniquely from men towards women, when it's literally a basic fundamental part of being human. That child wasn't a threat to her and AD…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:45 PM
0

Not really sure that not being attracted to someone because they are not of the right gender and not being unattracted to someone, of the gender you are attracted to, for arbitrary, superficial or bigoted reasons is really comparable though. There's a difference between heterosexual women finding men unattractive and heterosexual men finding men unattractive. Not just because one is a biological/cultural norm, and subject to its own kind of rules and roles, but because you are attracted to that …
/r/MensRights30/10/18 01:35 PM
14

That quote also assumes that women can't cause harm, be abusive or be violent, specifically towards men. that men don't face or fear violence, despite being the receiving end of violence more so than women, on average, by a considerable amount that men don't have legitimate fears or concerns about opening up to women, even when doing so will demonstrably harm them that "women laughing at men" isn't something of concern, even when that ridiculing/belittlement is both a symptom of greater negative…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:37 PM
1

Makes more sense and is less hateful than that "men are scared women will laugh at them, women are scared men will kill them" quote misandric ideologues like to throw around.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 03:21 PM
94

If this guy wasn't a high profile comedian, people would just be calling him an incel misogynist.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 08:40 PM
1

Threatening someone of false sexual allegations is also something far more poignant than threatening them with false allegations of theft. Women know how much destruction they can cause on a man's life with those words, and many would have no issues abusing that knowledge to threaten and scare men. It makes them feel powerful, as if they were walking around with a loaded gun and a license to kill.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 04:57 PM
2

Feminist: "We should provide protection against prejudice for everyone, except those fucking spics." Logic: "wtf? why wouldn't we protect hispanic people from hate speech? That seems pretty hateful" Feminist: "This is the ultimate example of whataboutery – when a group of people cries, 'But what about X?'..." It's funny how fucked this logic is when you apply it to anything else.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 08:57 PM
5

Feminism isn't about equality, it's "equality" under a delusion of male absolute authority and oppression, where everything has to be in women's favour to balance out a slanted scale(the irony being that their scale is so slanted because they are so oblivious and uncaring about all the ways in which men are disadvantaged/disenfranchised, and all the ways in which women are advantaged or in a position of power).
/r/MensRights17/10/18 01:21 PM
2

Pretty sure those men have plenty to fear too. MA training won't help you if you are out-manned or out-gunned, and a gun won't help you if you aren't willing to kill someone over personal safety, risk going to jail for homocide, risk escalating a situation or if you get out-drawned.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 05:31 PM
4

It's scary that such a delusional and hateful song can get so much mainstream attention, or even be considered wholesome enough to be pushed on children.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 05:28 PM
4

"there is no single reason for the growing rate of male suicide" The reasons are all pretty clear and well-defined, it's a systematic and cultural problem in how men are treated. It's just not something society really wants to address or make any effort to change. Kind of like the raising threat of global warming, people know what they need to do and change for things to get better, they just don't want to do it or can't be bothered. This is why the response you get from these types of issues is…
/r/MensRights15/10/18 05:21 PM
1

It was pretty clear that this dude was trying to knock her phone out of her hand, because he didn't want to be filmed. The dude had decided he was going to make that kick regardless of the answer.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 05:10 PM
1

A lot of male-on-male violence is done explicitly to serve a woman's interests, or a result of "alpha-signalling" for female attention/approval. Women are complicit in a tremendous amount of male-on-male violence, either by instigating it, promoting it or rewarding it. You could even argue that it goes even deeper than that, with some male violence being a result of men's inability to emotionally express themselves(because women will shame them for it) or men's lower socio/economic standards of …
/r/MensRights15/10/18 04:05 PM
2

As if men didn't have to worry about being violently assaulted either... or didn't have dedicate significant amount of time in their lives to learn to become stronger, better fighters or better defend themselves(or complete strangers, since they are basically socially obligated to defend women who never bother to take the same steps).
/r/MensRights15/10/18 03:51 PM
1

People can use that excuse to justify pretty much anything and in the end just further the divide through nurture.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:41 PM
5

There have been many times in my life where I have seen boys/men assaulted by another men, and where girls/women were in absolute power to stop it. Not only did they not stop it but, in many occasions, actively chose to reward violent behaviour and harassment after the fact because it was "hot".
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:06 PM
9

A lot of the irrational disdain for "male insecurity" basically seems like cover for women to hate on superficial traits(like looks, height, size, etc), while also being able to claim that they aren't. Could you imagine if men did this to women? "No, i'm not dumping you because you have small tits, I'm dumping you because you are insecure about your small tits! I'm going to go date this woman with very large tits, because she is not insecure about her tits". This would be considered gas lighting…
/r/MensRights21/09/18 01:14 PM
5

By saying shit like that, not only are you actively encouraging a fundamental cultural double-standard but you are insulting, dismissing and disenfranchising a significant portion of the male population. It would be like telling women at the start of the suffrage movement "female suffrage will never happen, shut up and learn to cook".
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:59 PM
6

I wish more people cared about the double-standard, not only realizing how fundamentally messed up it is for women to have all these expectations of assertiveness and confidence on men(if not explicitly to make up for their own insecurities) but how women do actually have it considerably easier when it comes to having, dealing with and being accepted despite their insecurities.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:57 PM
33

asking girls whether they are happy (and boys too, but this is a survey about girls) Why? I guarantee you boys scored worse than the girls in terms of general happiness and wellbeing. Girls simply have to negotiate a world knowing they don’t look like a Kardashian, and that without the right grades they will be written off at 16. Girls don't need to look like kardashians to be loved(unlike men, who seemingly have to look more and more like male models to be even noticed), nor would they be writt…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:34 PM
2

TwoXC is built on the premise of male exclusion and suppressing voices based entirely on gender. It is inherently anti-male and sexist. It's like the "A broken clock is still right twice a day" expression. Just because there are occasions where people at twoXC say things that are sensible, doesn't mean that they care about gender equality or men's rights. Hell, it doesn't even mean that they are coming at those arguments with the same intentions or conclusions.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 06:12 PM
2

Seems like number twisting to push an anti-male agenda, mainly to justify further male exclusion/apartheids. If someone was looking to commit a crime, they would look for any opportunity they could find to do it. It's not an issue of gender neutral washrooms because these crimes would still be happening even without their existence. This is also not really taking into consideration the rate of false accusations from women who maybe didn't want, or weren't ready, to share washrooms with men in th…
/r/MensRights17/09/18 04:56 PM
8

If you honestly think men's problems can be solved or fixed by "talking about it" or seeing a therapist, then you don't really understand men's issues at all. "Toxic masculinity" is not what is causing male suicide, and the attempt to appropriate men's issues as "toxic masculinity" is little more than victim blaming and dismissive ignorance. Feminism was never about equality, and it certainly was never about helping men. The very fact that you would come in here blaming "toxic masculinity" as a …
/r/MensRights14/09/18 10:18 PM
17

Why men stay single(voluntarily or involuntarily)? Hypergamy; unrealistic expectations from women towards men; heightism/racism from women(especially towards short and/or eastern men); harmful double-standards and gender role expectations still prominent against men; lack of accountability for toxic/dangerous behaviour from women within relationships; complete lack of reproductive rights; a great deal of prejudice and hostility from women towards men and male heterosexuality(anti-male heterophob…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:24 PM
1

The way "man up" is used against men, the equivalent response may as well just be "housewife up". Same mentality, same gender roles, same toxic ideals.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 03:43 PM
1

How is lumping all incels as violent shooters any better?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:35 PM
2

Women are not responsible for their own choices or complicity in hypergamy! It's mens/patriarchy's fault for indoctrinating them! And, even armed with that knowledge, do you think they will change? Nope, not a chance. At best, they will go "things are bad, and they should change, just not from me because it's my personal preference".
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:27 PM
14

Seems like a combination of more women going to college than men, women going for majors that have no real return on investment and women not really being able to offload their debt onto other men(fathers, boyfriends, husbands, government, etc) as much as before. This is another case of women failing to hold themselves accountable for their choices and then blaming misogyny/discrimination when it's clear that no discrimination took place. And, on the subject of making college cheaper or subsidiz…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:11 PM
13

She says this as if this hasn't always been the status quo for feminism. Like, come on, cut the bullshit. The only reason why mainstream thinks metoo is going too far is because it also brought some minor negative impacts on women in the work place too.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 03:06 PM
2

It's almost as if men have to learn to become more aggressive to defend themselves from other men and women as a result of how society treats them. Or as if men have to learn to be more aggressive to earn respect/love from women who expect masculine men, and compete with other men for that respect/love.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:38 PM
6

Why are people so insistent on this notion that feminism started off with noble intentions. It didn't. This is a misconception, a delusion or just bad history. Feminism always started off with a major pro-female, anti-male, bias. Historically, men haven't really had it easy either, and it's really not doing those men any service to just rewrite history under feminist lens where all women were subjugated and all men oppressed them. That is not how things are, or have ever been. Women have always …
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:27 PM
23

Man, what happened to Jim Jefferies? This guy used to be pretty based, and funny, but lately he has literally been on the wrong side of every issue.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:30 PM
7

Funny, I've been nice and kind to every woman in my life, and yet have still been told that I am trash for being male all the same.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 05:28 PM
5

Reverse the genders and this is automatically labelled as the most hateful movement on the internet and possibly a terrorist group.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 03:05 PM
15

Feminism's main problem is that it sells itself as a movement for equality but, really, only pursues goals that benefit women under a delusional and very dangerous false premise. Basically, that women are universally oppressed and that men have all the power in a patriarchal system, which is simply not reality. It is a pursuit of power for women, to try to match a non-existent ideal, or epitome of power, that does not even exist for men. It is a pursuit of power for women, to "balance the scales…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:17 PM
38

It's insane how some women feel entitled to free ninja publicity. If he doesn't want to stream with women, that's his decision. How many women choose not to affiliate with men or take part in "women-only" groups?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 01:56 PM
1

That's like saying racism, or ethnic prejudice/discrimination, is okay because because it's just a preference, or argue that it's best to just leave them to work their own shit out(despite the fact that it is clearly affecting others).
/r/MensRights15/08/18 01:33 PM
1

Bullshit. Heightism against men from women doesn't stem from nothing, nor is it some innate natural preference. In this case, it is a manifestation of pre-existing social prejudice. It is rooted in a strict adherence to archaic gender roles, specifically by women. The way women tend to delegitimize and belittle men for being short also extends far beyond "preference", and the way it is shared, passed down and enforced from woman to woman also demonstrates that it isn't really a "personal" prefer…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:57 PM
2

I would argue that cultural misandry, sexism, female entitlement and toxic femininity are the inherent reasons as to why there are so few women in stem, no misogyny. Women are not excluded from STEM. If anything, men in STEM are lonely and desperate have more women around. It is women's prejudices against men, or more specifically nerdy/unmasculine men, that is incentivizing them to not only stay out of STEM but actively vilify it as well.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:44 PM
1

I think the first step is, rather than treating every issue that men face as their personal deficiency or mental-health problem(if not an issue of their own doing), maybe we need to focus on addressing the many legitimate social/cultural issues that they are struggling to deal or cope with in the first place. Too often people tell men to "get help" or "talk to someone about it", simply dismiss the issue or avoid dealing with it in the first place. When men are victimized and struggle internally …
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:40 PM
2

It's a bit weird how women can qualify attention as being unwanted, simply because it comes from men. Like, that is pretty high up there on the prejudice scale. Can't really imagine a guy being able to get away with saying anything like that against women based on gender.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:35 PM
11

It's a pretty horrible skit though, to be honest. Literally starts off saying false accusations basically never happen and ends with a bunch of lame attempts at humour, one of which is literally assault. Samantha Bee is a generally horrible person, especially when it comes to men or men's rights. I doubt she has any genuine intentions about this whatsoever. She's also kind of making a joke out of the subject, while simultaneously trying to lecture people about not making rape jokes(and, again, o…
/r/MensRights02/08/18 07:29 PM
0

That's a major investment, in terms of time, money and public scrutiny, to take on for a case that will likely not land in his favour. People favour women in these types of cases, specifically because the problem of discrimination is so rampant. That is assuming he can even fully prove his innocence, which is not the easiest thing to do in these types of cases.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:15 PM
10

Even that is pretty fucked up. As if him being in the same class as her somehow posed a threat to her only and specifically because he is a man. If he ever a legitimate threat to her, he wouldn't act on it in the middle of a class room and barring him from those classes would not actually keep her safe(i.e. if one person, regardless of gender, had any kind of legitimate intent to do harm towards another, that person could and would just find a way to act on it outside of class). All this serves …
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:05 PM
2

The messed up thing is that this is literally her own misandric and narcissistic(if not sociopathic) projection of the male population. I bet you the "porn addicts" she describes aren't really addicts. I be you the "sensitive guys" she describes don't really need that much emotional labour(might just be guys being vocal about basic emotional fundamentals in a relationship that she is lacking or not contributing). I bet you those "emotionally distant manipulators" aren't all that manipulative to …
/r/MensRights27/07/18 01:53 PM
2

What you are trying to justify is the use of murder as a punishment for people who use deadly force, the threat of death, as a means of control, which not only has nothing to do with rape(threat of death could be used for literally anything) but also absent for a significant portion of rape cases(threats of violence do not necessarily include deadly force).
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:30 PM
3

Death is an appropriate punishment for any crime that uses deadly force You don't see how that is incredibly hypocritical? In that statement, you are literally arguing that you deserve death for your willingness to use deadly force on others as a punishment for their crimes. There is also a very big difference between using murder as punishment and killing someone in self-defence where no other options are available or viable(i.e. not excessive force). Your argument also makes very little sense …
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:08 PM
2

Death isn't really an appropriate punishment for anything, and certainly not an appropriate punishment for a crime that is objectively subjective. People who treat rape is if it was the worse thing you could ever do to someone, worse than torture, death, maiming or any other form of permanent physical harm, are not looking at the crime rationally or critically. It's a disproportionate emotional response that stems from an over-sensitivity to sexual crimes(specifically and exclusively against wom…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:29 PM
14

Could you imagine a world where people would think a man is justified in repeatedly shooting and then deheading a woman because she forced herself on his dick?
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:18 PM
14

I had my eyelids removed at birth and I've never had any issues seeing. I have to use a saline solution every time i want to open my eyes for longer than 20 seconds and it burns every time it's windy but my doctor told me that people without eyelids are 0.01% less likely to contract pink eye so it's definitely worth it. Besides, my girlfriend told me that girls prefer guys without eyelids anyway. I am very offended that there are people out there who would try to suggest that there is something …
/r/MensRights25/07/18 02:57 PM
3

I appreciate the consistency but I hate the idea of just getting offended by thirsty comments, or the reaction to call them creepy. Humans aren't asexual machines. They shouldn't be expected to act like children or eunuchs, even in a place about cute things, and especially not because it's become the norm to call men(if they are unattractive) creeps for expressing some form of sexual personality. That is a negative predisposition that mainly stems from prejudice against men, if not even what I w…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 02:39 PM
13

Women are valued simply for existing due to their wombs That's maybe one part of it but most men don't just value women for their "womb", they value women because they value romantic, physical, emotional and sexual connections. Or to put it simply, women are simply valued because men genuinely love women for who they are, not for what they can take from them. A woman that is unable or unwilling to have children would still be valued, loved an desired all the same by most heterosexual men.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 02:23 PM
1

"Some form of stalking" doesn't sound like adheres to any kind of legal definition here, nor does that legal definition really come into play when someone makes a false accusation, to her peers, friends or social media, of stalking. It is form of character assassination that is generally far harder to disprove, and it's something that women can abuse far more effectively using gender(women are victims/weak/innocent, men are aggressive/malicious/dangerous/strong). The post here is also fairly uns…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 01:56 PM
3

This is kind of scary, to be honest. This seems like another tool for women to use against men. False accusations of stalking are probably a lot more common than people think they are, and just as damaging as any other false accusation. I have seen some women do this first hand, and it destroyed a guy. And, where does the line get drawn? When girls put up pictures on social media and make them public, can or will they then claim stalking when people, or more specifically men, they aren't friends…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 01:28 PM
342

No, this person just compared a 17 year old boy who feeds the homeless to a rapist AND hitler.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 02:34 PM
0

I would argue that the only type of systematic privilege a man can receive is one of social pre-approval. It's not really a privilege that all men receive, just the ones that are tall, healthy, good-looking, assertive, masculine, confident and charismatic. At a systematic, cultural or social level, these men are privilege because they are viewed as the epitome of desirability and masculinity, and that is pretty much exclusively driven by female approval. These men are treated better than every o…
/r/MensRights20/07/18 02:22 PM
3

“The nature of the abuse that women receive is on the basis of them being a woman." All the abuse that men get that women don't, IS on the basis of their gender. Names like loser, neckbeard, small dick, manlet, nerd, dork or cuck are all on the basis of gender. Male virgin shaming is on the basis of gender. Even words like "nigger" or "faggot", which are racist/homophobic, are also exclusively used on men and are therefore used on the basis of gender. Even just a general negative predisposition …
/r/MensRights20/07/18 01:57 PM
2

The worse thing about the way she defines sexual abuse here is that she defines it on a subjective measure as well, which is entirely prone to personal bias and prejudice. For example, a racist would say "I was touched by a black person, so I feel traumatized/abused", just like many sexist women will argue "I was touched by a man, so I feel traumatized/abused" in situations where women touching them in the same way wouldn't leave them feeling traumatized or abused in the slightest.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 01:32 PM
13

More girls would resort to self-harm for attention, because it works. When girls hurt themselves, people pay attention to them, because people actually do care about girls/women. When boys hurt themselves, the response is typically something like "cut deeper you emo faggot, no one cares". That is mostly because people generally don't really care as much about men, or their struggles, but also because people are extremely prejudice towards any type of weakness in men(often that weakness is used t…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 06:00 PM
2

That's cool, when are girls going to start being held accountable for their actions? Or do they just want to have fun still?
/r/MensRights19/07/18 05:48 PM
24

So, basically, she felt entitled to male protection? How shocking. Clearly men are not allowed to take their own safety into consideration when a women is at risk or when a woman perceives herself at risk. Do you know how many times in my life I have faced violence or aggression from people(men or women) towards men(myself included), only to see women not only walk away or turn a blind eye to it(even though they were in a position of power to stop it, as women) but actually reward, glorify or en…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 06:27 PM
2

Interesting logic. You would think that a rapist, if anything, would just assume all rape accusations to be true(because he or she is a rapist, and therefore claims of rape, no matter how farfetched, would seem more plausible to them). Someone who is normal, if anything, should be a bit more critical of rape claims, not just because that a neutral stance(applying a burden of proof for all sides) but because the notion of rape would feel more foreign and less plausible to them as well. Like, a mu…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 04:07 PM
16

It's obviously clear that most feminists have no interest in gender equality and are literally just there to virtue signal, because of gynocentrism or just to hate on men.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 02:31 PM
41

Feminists have more to gain by capitalizing on the victim narrative. If feminists were truly ever motivated by reducing rape numbers, they wouldn't be so strongly opposed to every piece of common sense advice that women could follow to keep themselves safer and self-reliant. "Teach men not to rape" dogma demonstrates a stronger emphasis on demonizing men than on reducing rates of victimization.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:48 PM
5

There was literally no reason for you to even ask that question.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:41 PM
-1

Gynocentrism? Chivalry? Benevolent sexism? Systematic preferential treatment of women? Socially accepted gender discrimination and vilification? Take your pick.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:38 PM
1

I can definitely see both sides here. If a woman was to come in and ask for a hair cut that he's qualified for and has done on a thousand different men before, then he wouldn't really have any grounds to refuse her. At that point, that would be discrimination because it would be denying someone a unilateral service over gender. If women, or men for that matter, were coming in asking for a service that he isn't trained for, then it should totally be within his rights to refuse them because then i…
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:36 PM
8

"Benevolently sexist towards women" is literally just a backwards way of saying "sexist against men".
/r/MensRights10/07/18 04:44 PM
1

The ol' "That's not real feminism though" is the official google stance too?
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:18 PM
1

Honestly, couldn't you have found a better examples to make this point? If the genders were reversed here, no one would really take offence to that. People are treating this oblivious tapping like she just got stabbed, specifically and only because it was a guy doing it(if it had been a girl tapping her ass, she wouldn't have reacted that way), are kind of a problem too.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:16 PM
5

5'6" and under would be "short". 5'7" to 5'9" would be average(also taller than most women). 5'10" to 6'2" would be tall. 6'3" or above would be unusually tall.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 04:03 PM
2

Incels actually have legitimate gender inequality issues working against them. Feminists do not.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 04:00 PM
2

Where does it say that she lost her job over this? I mean, I've seen lots of male developers be targeted and fired over opinions made on their personal social media accounts before, but never really in a case like this where the person in question is spouting SJW extremist BS or anti-male bigotry. It's kind of pathetic how Jessica Price would not only use her gender to shut an opinion down, which is very sexist, but also using her title as well(Being paid to do it doesn't mean you know every thi…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 03:59 PM
1

Could it just be more of a "fat/obese women have to work harder and longer hours to succeed" situation(i.e. because they cannot coast on their looks or vaginas, they have to fall back on the same meritocracy that men do)?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:17 PM
3

So... clearly, it's women who need to be taught not to rape.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:15 PM
1

It's not incels when they do it by choice. The idea that there are no men out there willing to commit to women is a complete fallacy. Women have plenty of choice of men to have sex with or men willing to commit, women just don't want to put in the effort. Male incels have no options for sex or commitment.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:39 PM
1

"In my opinion, if a guy hits a girl it's because he's pushed to his last straw. You've clearly fucked up. You don't hit him back, you take that shit because regardless of who's fault it was, you said something that made him so mad that he had to resort to hitting you. Never hit a man." Sounds pretty horrible when you switch the genders.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:47 PM
1

Wouldn't it be more feasible to just address the way women tend to over-romanticize the few or the unavailable, or how they negatively judge overly-available men, or just how they view and measure men in general, as to promote a wider distribution of partnership? Forcing monogamy seems like a brute force solution that would just breed a lot of problems.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 03:48 PM
9

"getting an #incel vibe from redacted" Funny how you can insult a man's sexuality in 2018(slut or virgin shaming certainly wouldn't be acceptable if targeted against women), while also completely ignoring the fact that this is a blatant attempt to shame and silence a man for his gender while flexing her own sexual/social power and privilege over men. Pointing out sexism against men by women? Well then, you clearly deserve to be mistreated or unloved by women because of it. Because the idea of wo…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 07:58 PM
11

The crossroad is not any different. A woman using a man's DNA without his knowledge or consent is, already, questionable enough. To force him into a permanent situation that he never wanted to be involved with to begin with(which will have it's physical cost in terms of added labour), or through the emotional stress that a child entails(which will also have a physical cost in terms of stress, depression and anxiety) is something that women simply shouldn't be able to do. You can't force unqualif…
/r/MensRights22/06/18 07:37 PM
25

So much for consent or physical self-sovereignty. I guess his body, his choice doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 06:42 PM
9

The problem is not that men and women can't work together, the problem is mainly how we demonize heterosexual men for having basic physical or emotional needs in the work place, while also not really holding heterosexual women accountable for the way they use their sexuality to capitalize on those physical or emotional needs(we would only and exclusively blame men for using their professional power for personal gain, when really the fault is two-sided).
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:46 PM
2

It is still technically paranoia when it is specifically targeted against men, or any kind of group based on gender/ethnicity/etc?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:14 PM
3

It is fine for women to state at men's crotch, just like it should be fine for men to look at women too. Why are we assuming that this extreme negative and irrationally violent disposition that so many women are taught to have towards male sexual attraction is the default one? It isn't. There is nothing wrong, unnatural, unhealthy or demeaning about women sexualizing men or men sexualizing women. If you see beautiful, it's natural to want to look at it. If you see something your body craves, or …
/r/MensRights19/06/18 08:00 PM
9

You know, despite all the slandering, strawmanning and general hatred thrown towards mgtow and incels, there's never been a single instance of any of those groups promoting "going gay because women are the enemy".
/r/MensRights15/06/18 08:07 PM
1

The language used for this description of the disparity between the two kind of bothers me, as if it should just be taken for granted that it is men who are indoctrinated about being irrationally positive about sexual advances from women. What if it was the opposite, and it was actually women who were indoctrinated into being irrationally negative about sexual advances from men? What if the way men react to sexual advances from women is, in fact, actually completely healthy or natural. Like, is …
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:48 PM
1

It's honestly kind of getting scary to me how much slandering, negative projections and character assassination is being thrown towards "white nerds, mra's, incels, etc". Like, if you look back at history, when was that type of attitude ever on the right side of history? It's like today's SJW's are trying to treat white men, nerdy men or male incels the way people treated homosexuals or black people a hundred years ago. It's ironic how they justify their hate with ignorance, the same way extremi…
/r/MensRights13/06/18 05:15 PM
2

Basically, it's an empathy gap. A pebble for women is perceived as a boulder and a mountain for men is perceived as non-existent.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 03:42 PM
7

Well, biohazard waste disposal is a pretty male dominated field, as are most science or blue collar fields. Not sure why post-mortem waste disposal would be any different. Kind of a major insult to men to dismiss the social and cultural factors that drive that discrepancy and portray those fields as equally distributed.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:55 PM
14

Apparently the men who have virtually none of those expectations or who are emotionally incapable of cheating are just invisible to women?
/r/MensRights06/06/18 03:03 PM
1

I imagine a lot of men are afraid of false accusations because a lot of men have been victims false accusations, slander and character assassination in their live times, or have seen other men around them be victims, and were entirely powerless to do anything about it. False accusations of rape are one extreme but false accusations of lesser crimes, or just negative projections which are not crimes, are far more common. Men are scared of false accusations because they have seen and heard first h…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 02:55 PM
1

When has men's voices been heard? Who is hearing them? What are these mystical creatures actually listening or caring about what men have to say?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:09 PM
1

Keep in mind, a lot of men would lie about having sex when they haven't and a lot of women would lie about not having sex when they did. So the values you see here are realistically more extreme then they appear. Another thing that would skew this would be men who have had sex by paying for it, which would be more common for men than for women. Also, this stat specifies just once in the last year, so it doesn't also account for how much more often or how many more partners women might have compa…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 03:02 PM
3

It's not just the media, it's society in general. She will get a much lighter sentence for having sex with a 13-year old than he will. Assuming she was to even get jail time, she would be treated very differently than he will be. After less than a year, most people will forget about her and have long moved on from her arrest. He will spend the rest of his life paying for his crime. There will be people following this guy's life to make sure an anonymous phone call is made to every employer or pa…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 06:41 PM
4

I am a man who has been a victim of gossip mongering, false accusations, character assassination, social shunning, meddling, tattling and other forms of slander by a particular woman and one of the most disheartening thing for me when going through this is how many mutual friends actually stood by without doing anything. Former female mutual friends just facilitated her actions because gender took priority over truth. This sort of female solidarity basically meant that mutual female friends supp…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 08:45 PM
36

Ironic thing is that the BioHazard Clean-Up industry, just like the garbage or toxic-waste clean-up industry, is completely male dominated. You certainly don't see a lot of feminists lining up for jobs like that.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:31 PM
5

Funny thing is that female leads actually seem to do a lot better in the video game industry than they do in the movie industry, despite the fact that not only does the movie industry has a far bigger female demographic than the gaming industry but that feminism has essentially been relentless on their attacks against it and vilification of all things male and nerdy.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:26 PM
3

It's "creepy" because, again, it's a guy showing heretosexual interest. No one uses the term "creepy" to describe similar or identical female behaviour. No guy would call a woman creepy for hitting on him, no matter how bad she is at it. Most men would also have far more realistic expectations about social/romantic interactions, and wouldn't just put all of the onus on women to approach them(aka. "game"). Men are just not raised to treat female attention like it is an insult or offensive, the wa…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:21 PM
1

And then people will try to argue that twoXC isn't a misandry sub, or that it's in any way fair/balanced. Clearly, it is not.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:01 PM
2

I think a good reason why men are okay with random compliments is that they simply haven't been indoctrinated in feeling offended by random compliments the way women have(and, it's pretty much exclusively when it's coming from men, because women don't get offended by random compliments from women). This is something that women are taught, not something that is natural, healthy or innate. It is a symptom of misandry, or how women are taught to resent, hate and fear male heterosexuality.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 02:57 PM
14

It's not even "chivalry", it's literally entitlement, narcissism and misandry. If you think your gender means you need to be treated like royalty, and his gender means he has to accept being treated like your servant, you have some issues. Women shouldn't be expecting guys to subjugate themselves like this anymore, and it is entirely wrong and sexist for them to have this type of expectation. And, yeah, there have been countless guys out there who have been punished for being too nice. Either th…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 07:27 PM
6

The term objectification as defined by feminism is basically just another means to demonize men and male heterosexuality. They project this notion that it is dehumanizing for men to look at a woman sexually, which is not only entirely false but absolutely backwards as well. It would be far more dehumanizing to desexualize someone, which is something that women do to men all the time for all kinds of sexist or arbitrary reasons(this is where most of the "nice guy/friend zone" situations stem from…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 03:02 PM
9

I've been watching it, even commented on it, but it's hard to get around the fem-victim mentality in gaming. When men and women talk shit to men, because they are men(as they wouldn't be talking like that to women), or specifically attacking men for their gender(insults of being a loser, creep, neckbeard, virgin, short or feminine are all things that are said exclusively to insult men), apparently no one cares or notices. When women face a tenth of that abuse, it's considered a global issue, and…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:38 PM
17

"It's just a preference bro!"
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:09 PM
2

Because people are still under the perception that men can't be victims(or, if they are, they are not really "men" because they "allowed" themselves to be victimized or they are weak) and that women can't be assailants or malevolent(basically what they do is always innocent or not as bad). Male on female rape is seen as a crime worse than murder, because of how we actively vilify men and male sexuality and victimize women and female sexuality.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:09 PM
4

That's the thing, right. Like, I agree that gender shouldn't be an issue if you can play at a competitive level but then you also can't have "women's leagues" either. It's one or the other.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:35 PM
2

Honestly, it's probably how it should be. "boy scouts" and "girl scouts" is kind of unnecessary and promotes gender segregation. It should just be scouts. Realistically though, there might still be a market for all three no matter what.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:27 PM
1

It's just that the scales aren't that imbalanced enough to justify what incels ultimately become Clearly that isn't true, otherwise you would not have such an imbalance between men and women, or what you define as "what incels ultimately become". This doesn't really just come from nothing. It is the way it is because that is the position men are currently in culturally/socially. Most of the things they complain about are within their control (including the act of complaining) How are these thing…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 08:16 PM
3

If feminists don't respect "his life, his choice" or "his body, his choice" when it comes to a man's choice in being a father(affects every aspect of his life for the rest of his life, including many circumstances that will affect his body) or having his DNA used against/without his consent, then why would feminists ever expect anyone to respect "her body, her choice"?
/r/MensRights01/05/18 07:23 PM
22

I think the the social and romantic market heavily favours women, at virtually every step of courting, and that this imbalance of power is essentially what creates so many incels(which have always been mostly male). When a woman has confidence issues or insecurities, there is a whole system of support and marketing tell her she's awesome and lovable; and no shortage of men willing to compensate for that by taking the initiative with them. When men have unpopular views with women, women will typi…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:54 PM
48

Pretty much all relationship "advice" is female-favoured. Whenever there any kind of insecurity or uncertainty about a relationship from a women it's basically just a flood of "you are a victim" and "you can do better" bullshit, or it's always portrayed as being a man's fault for not catering to a woman's needs/desires(he's a deadbeat for not meeting her unrealistic/unhealthy/sexist expectations).
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:15 PM
12

She basically said that discriminating against the mother was bad because she was a woman or, more specifically, because women are oppressed. Not only did she imply that it would be more acceptable had it been a father but she also legitimized her insane claim that men have everything and women only have crumbs. It's a decent reply but there is still some very visible signs of misandry and feminist indoctrination in there.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:54 PM
1

White knights are still men, if not simply men who are misguided or misrepresented. They have their views and opinions, some of which may be harmful to themselves or other men, but they could still men be men in need of help or support. And, at the end of the day, the only reason people would even label or insult them as "white knights" is because of their gender. It is insulting men because they are men..
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:17 PM
4

A "successful transition" is subjective. Someone with gender dysphoria may think they have successfully transitioned once they have reached some threshold of resemblance but that transition is literally only skin deep. They are still of the same body, same DNA, same physiology(early psychological development also doesn't change) but they have simply managed to convince themselves otherwise. That is another delusion that just feeds into the dysphoria. Them believing that they have successfully tr…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:12 PM
4

"Being trans" is gender dysphoria. It is literally the internalized belief that you are of the wrong gender, typically based on gender stereotypes or a desire to belong(be included) in the opposite gender group(a form of internalize self-hatred/guilt). It is a fallacy. It is an attempt to change the body to match the mind and a refusal to fix the mind to match the body. It is no different than someone who believes they are born of the wrong skin colour, country or era. That being said, what peop…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:11 PM
0

This doesn't really have anything to do with men's rights. If anything it's just a derogatory projection against certain men.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:02 PM
9

The bigger social/cultural issue would be that society completely fails to hold women accountable for how they treat and judge men in these types of situations. If a guy is vulnerable to a woman because he sees her as greater than she is(subjective value vs objective value), then she would be in a position of power. When the genders are reversed, we hold men accountable for how they treat women. If a woman devalues a man because he chooses or is unable to defend himself from her, due to how he f…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:35 PM
9

It is a very sexist expectation and it's kind of a really shitty thing for guys to feel that they need to cross the street to make a woman feel safe. When you see black people expressed a need to cross the street to avoid white people so that they feel safe because of their prejudice, it isn't right. It is literally internalized guilt and belittlement that men are expected to feel for crimes they never committed, because of their gender. And, what's worse, is that there are also plenty of women …
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:03 PM
3

I liked the video and i agree. Women should aim to be strong, independent, confident and empowered, and they should embrace men even when they aren't as strong, independent, confident or empowered. Just because those men aren't there yet, doesn't mean that they can't be. It's okay for women to take the lead and lead by example. Men shouldn't have to be the one in the proactive role(or women in the reactive role) and shouldn't have to be the one always in the lead that women depend on for their c…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:06 PM
4

Because "nobody owes you sex" is pretty much exclusively used against men, if not directly out of prejudice against men or when projecting against men who never believed they were entitled to sex in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 06:13 PM
11

Perfect example of how women are still largely and irrationally negatively predisposed against video games and men who play video games. This is why you don't have as many women in competitive gaming. This is why most men feel they have to hide their interest in gaming from women. This is why you still see men surprised to run into women who play video games. This is why you don't have as many women involved in the gaming industry. It is not discrimination against women, it is women who are stil…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:12 PM
11

It's kind of shitty that youtube would demonetize for political views but men and women are not defined by their political views either. A woman is not a woman because of her skin care routine. A man is a man regardless of how traditional or masculine he is or isn't.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:25 PM
5

The notion that women were powerless because they were not forced to do hard labour and/or fight for their existence is the most backwards fallacy to spew out of feminism. There has never been a slave-master dynamic in which the slaves get all the positives(safety, leniency, provision, wealth, etc) and the master get all the negatives(death, indifference, work, debt, etc).
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:53 PM
5

The "pink tax" is basically how feminists choose to look at luxury goods marketed at girls/women(either directly capitalizing on a sense of vanity, gender identity or male-bashing/misandry). Basically, you have basic bland items and then "fancier/cuter/pink" versions of items that are marketed at women(if not specifically because women have access to higher disposable incomes to spend on those items). Women still have access to those basic bland items, which they don't really want because they a…
/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:18 PM
1

Your question makes no sense. I never claimed that male-only facilities directly promoted the idea men as perpetrators. I claimed that there were plenty of dubious or even malicious reasons why someone might open one, including to legitimize the concept and investments in female-only facilities(which directly promote the idea of men as perpetrators and women as victims).
/r/MensRights10/04/18 03:38 PM
9

That sounds like a lot of bullshit. There is no reason why a gender neutral facility couldn't succeed in helping people. Female-only centers are focused around the premise of "female-safe spaces" or basically this idea that by being around other women and away from men, as opposed to just their abuser, that this makes them safe. That is deliberately anti-male and entirely driven and supported by the notion of "men as perpetrators".
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:46 PM
7

Why would you need men-only facilities if you just didn't segregate mental health facilities by gender in the first place(which, again, promotes the idea of men as perpetrators and excludes/disenfranchises men)? There just needs to be mental health facilities, that are open to those who need them. Either way, that doesn't mean someone couldn't open up such a facility for the wrong reasons or with the wrong intents. There is plenty of back-handed attempts to male-only services from feminism that …
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:10 PM
34

People wouldn't have to ask you "what about men" if you didn't focus every issue on women only, either dismissing facts, disenfranchising men or using that sexist focus on women to justify a vilification of men.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 02:45 PM
14

I wonder if anyone has ever considered the possibility men have to present themselves as more confident of their abilities, because if they don't no one will cut them any slack and they won't differentiate themselves from other male competition; and maybe women don't have to appear as confident as men do because they will be accepted or deemed valuable regardless because they are women. Men who exude insecurity, even when fully competent, would not only be negatively penalized on a professional …
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:03 PM
11

It's not really misspelled. Both analogies serve the same purpose.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 02:05 PM
21

The message is that one girl's choice to distract other student is less important than the educational standards placed by the school for everyone else. Also, if a boy dressed in the same way, feminists would want to have him sent home or arrested because they want to provide women a 'safe environment' from the oppressive viles of the male body.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 02:01 PM
3

She then posted that while she didn't want to wish sexual violence upon anyone The weirdest thing to me about that sentiment is that most of the world doesn't even recognize things like genital assault(punching, kicking, maiming, crushing or cutting of male genitals) as sexual violence but it is. Main stream media is full of depictions of male genital assault, often for comedic effect. I've seen a lot of women(and men) in my life time casually joke about emasculation/castration/nullification, as…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 05:48 PM
1

Pretty sure it's a problem of competence and position. I could easily make the argument that women are far more entitled than men are. Men are far less privileged but they are also trained to be competent and capable in matters of fighting(if not quite literally for the benefit of women or so that women don't have to be). In a country that is so heavily centered around guns and military as the US, that includes being competent and capable with guns. More guns means more men having or wanting to …
/r/MensRights23/03/18 05:37 PM
1

Women only competing against women and taught to only idolize female players creates a major self-imposed skill ceiling though. It's kind of a self-perpetuating cycle. You could say that the best hockey players in Sweden would struggle against a team of 14 year old Canadian/Russian players, and use that as a justification to say that Swedes are just biologically bad or will never be as good but that also would be complete bullshit. Women-only leagues basically are just organizations that set the…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:03 PM
1

Exactly, there should never be any gender restriction if you're just looking for "the best of the best". The problem, however, is that you then have women who are unwilling or unable to compete against men and then demand women-only leagues, which then also sets a precedent and completely legitimizes men-only leagues. Gender segregated leagues just shouldn't really exist. They are inherently sexist, if not entirely exploiting or promoting gender-specific sexualization(putting gender/bodies above…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 07:57 PM
3

Most men are going to jump into whatever bandwagon they think women want them to jump into(even when its at their own expense) because men basically just want to be loved and appreciated by women. This is as true today as it was in the dark ages, and long before that. It is what drives men to build, to work, to fight, to take the lead and take the blame(all roles that feminism have historically vilified men for, despite also being roles that were culturally pushed/expected on men by women). It's…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 04:03 PM
5

These types of comments always kind of blow my mind. Like, this is not anything new. This is the same feminism we had years ago. I know, because I was an egalitarian and men's rights activists years ago too, fighting the same misandry and hypocrisy. I know, because there were plenty of people then going "Look! See for yourself! Here are all the stats. Here are all the arguments. Feminism is not about equality". None of this is anything new. Feminism's core ideals and motivation(mainly female cha…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:55 PM
3

Nothing more than pure female chauvinism and entitlement. Their attitude is incredibly sexist and toxic. They should not expect the seat to be put down for them, they should simply be adjusting the seat to their desired position when they go to use it. The fact that so many women not only make this an issue but actually feel like that should just be the position that men set for them by default(or that men, as second class citizens, should just cater to their demands without question) is insane,…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 02:47 PM
2

Sounds like ignorant drivel. Feminism doesn't have a history of helping men or any benefit to men is unintentional. There would have never been a men's rights movement if feminism had ever done anything in regards to men(it also wouldn't be called feminism anymore). Most MRA's also consider themselves to be egalitarians. It's also kind of harder for the men's rights movement to put itself in the spotlight when they are so easily slandered as women-haters or worse(men also don't really have the s…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:30 PM
1

Sex is rape because men are dominant... I guess women can't be dominant or men can't be submissive or altruistic(non-dominant)? Women apparently can't "fuck" a man with their vaginas? Or, maybe the problem is that feminists/women only see dominant men as legitimate, or worth having sex with, and therefore all sex is rape by their own choice?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:21 PM
0

The kiss was a dumb publicity stunt. If she really felt bad about him never having been kissed she could have just done it after the cameras were off. She did it on stage in front of everyone to put him on the spot, or make some kind of example out of him(belittling him for being a kissless virgin) and show everyone how cool and fun she is(basically objectifying him in a way to promote herself). That being said, I really don't think what she did was that bad. If it was the other way around, peop…
/r/MensRights19/03/18 05:13 PM
22

I think the worse implication is that looking, or liking, is a crime. There is basically this massive epidemy of heterophobia and androphobia, that everyone seems to find socially acceptable. There is just this very hostile natural predisposition towards male heterosexuality in our culture from women(which is then automatically adopted or internalized by men). You like a woman's appearance? You are a perv. You indicate to her in any way that you like her appearance? You're a creep. You treat her…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 08:55 PM
3

The subject doesn't really get brought up a lot because it is just not that common. I don't think I have ever met a woman who believed she was a man or that she would be happier being perceived as a man, but I have met men who thought they would be happier being perceived as women. Gender identity disorders are, generally, pretty one sided. The overwhelming majority of cases, which are all relatively recent, are MtF. And, in my opinion, that is a direct reflection/result of how society treats me…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 03:14 PM
2

No, blatant or extreme misandry gets down-voted on 2XC. Every other form of subtle or overt misandry is most definitely still embraced though. The entire premise of 2XC is, in of itself, deliberately exclusionary or alienating to men. It is inherently sexist.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:07 PM
7

The entire feminist movement is based on rewriting history. Feminist ideology depends on, and is driven by, false notions of female exclusive victimhood and social/systematic powerlessness; or male domination and chauvinism.
/r/MensRights02/03/18 08:01 PM
2

I wouldn't consider 2XC less toxic or more positive, they are just far less obvious about their misandry. In most situations it's the same bullshit but presented in a far more devious or subtle manner.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:19 PM
137

Never correct a woman when she's using false or incomplete information justify her reasoning and misdeeds and, whatever you do, never use the words "well, actually" because that will trigger her logical PTSD!
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:49 PM
2

Because of body language and tone. Because the intent/motivation is pretty obvious in how they follow through or laugh amongst themselves. Because there are legitimately no other reasons to do it? Because women who belittle, berate or provoke men for an ego boost isn't really uncommon(especially when women know there's nothing those men could ever really do about it)?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 02:13 PM
5

I have been "fake" catcalled, which felt pretty shitty. I would be completely fine with a catcall from a woman if there was genuine interest behind it. What women will typically do though, is get in a group and then catcall a dude with zero interest or intent to follow through, and then giggle among themselves about how brave and condescending they are. They just do it to fuck with you, taunt you with false hope, and give themselves a big ego boost. It is objectively and significantly worse, or …
/r/MensRights01/03/18 04:57 AM
7

It's a realistic/objective world view. It has nothing to do with positive or negative experiences with any particular woman. It is just the way it is. The gender roles that are imposed on men by women are very apparent, not just because I, or any man that would share this with me, experience them on a daily basis, but because they are visible in virtually every aspect of popular or mainstream culture. There is no shortage of women who are also extremely and shamelessly vocal about these things e…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 07:38 PM
8

Fatherless home(whether due to father's or mother's choice); which leads to boys growing up without masculine guidance(or growing up with false guidance, which would never work for them because they are not women); which leads to boys being treated like dirt by women(feminist, traditional or otherwise) who expect/demand masculine confidence; which leads to isolation, depression, desperation, belittlement, resentment and anger; which, in some extreme cases, leads to violent breakdowns and radical…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 04:49 PM
3

I do feel bad, for countless reasons. For one, they are being stereotypes and misrepresented in countless ways. They are vilified and radicalized for being men who just care a lot about women, and doing what they have been told is the right thing to do. They are doing everything they can to be good men to women, while simultaneously being told they are contemptible predators(if not simply for having a sexuality to begin with), incompatible allies(because they are men), that they are weak, meek o…
/r/MensRights24/02/18 07:09 PM
13

Also kind of stating that men either cannot be victimized or that, if they are, it's no big deal. It's also kind of implying that women are either wiser(better judges of intention) or nobler(their romantic/sexual interests are good, men's are bad). It's a pretty good example of classism(i.e. rich people can approach the poor but the poor cannot approach the rich).
/r/MensRights22/02/18 07:06 PM
3

It's not really a conspiracy theory when it's entirely self-evident, and when you have decades of feminist history to back it up. Your entire counter-argument is basically just gas-lighting. It's pathetic. Prove that it is a conspiracy theory. Prove that your notions or delusional idealism of feminism is not, in of itself, its own conspiracy theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 06:33 PM
1

No, feminists most certainly do not want men to break free form traditional gender roles. That is bullshit. The vast majority of feminist women out there still judge/value men on the same principles as most traditional women, and judge/value men based on strict gender role ideals. The notion of "toxic masculinity" is not women trying to dismantle gender roles. The notion of "toxic masculinity" is something that feminists use to demonize/discredit all men(to further promote the female victim narr…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 06:24 PM
2

If you are ostracized, belittled, desexualized, slandered or vilified for not living up to those gender roles, on a systematic level, that is enforcing gender roles. It's a pretty ignorant, if not sociopathic, to say "you're not forced, you have a choice" when presenting people with an impossible ultimatum. Gender roles are still very strongly imposed on men, if not explicitly and exclusively by women in the context of heterosexuality(which is the majority of human population), and feminism is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 06:14 PM
2

Why would you need citations? You can literally just see what drives the drivel and the policies. What drives the action in some areas, and the lack of action in others. It clearly isn't about equality. It clearly isn't about getting rid of gender roles whenever they are detrimental to men(if anything, feminism has demonstrated itself to be quite aggressive in reinforcing gender roles on men. The perpetual slander, belittlement and radicalization of "nice guys" is a perfect example of this). It …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/18 06:04 PM
9

Why would this surprise you? TrollX is basically SRS lite, or just the worse aspects of TwoX brought to the forefront.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:37 PM
1

"no means no" is basically a gendered argument against the non-gender specific notion that "everything can be negotiated"(note that negotiation never implies guarantee results either). It is inherently belittling to women in that it just assumes that all women are so inherently weak and ignorant that they simply cannot stand up for themselves or competently handle bargaining. Realistically, however, it is quite evident that the "no means no" rule doesn't really apply to every man equality and it…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 05:03 PM
11

I hate that rebuttal. Not only is it not actually pertinent to anything(because male victims are still victims whether they were victimized by men or women) but because it neglects so many other factors too. How many of those male aggressors acted in the direct or indirect interest of a woman? How many women are guilty of committing assault by proxy(from their victim status inherently inciting violence from other men or those women explicitly manipulating men to do their violence for them). Also…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:50 PM
2

The typical feminist definition of a "nice guy" is a fallacy and a charichature. It doesn't really exist. It's the tool that feminist women use to vilify the men that are failing to meet their expected gender role obligations(basically the gender roles that women are imposing on to them as men). It's a form of vilification that is used by feminist women to enable, rationalize or facilitate their dehumanization of men or desexualization of men of "unmasculine" men. It's a way of shutting down dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/18 04:21 PM
6

His opening argument is "I've never been conscious of the danger that surrounds me when I go out at night because I'm a man". What a load of shit. Not only is the danger there, because men can be victimized as well, but his obliviousness to it is not a proof of its inexistence(just like some women's irrational fear of victimization is a proof of its existence). What he's also pointing out here is not really a difference in gender but, rather, a difference in size/appearance. A smaller, shorter, …
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:18 PM
2

If you're looking for a fun challenge, just try to find ten movies that don't include some form of violence against men. People are so blind or oblivious to it but you will find violence against men in pretty much every movie in one form or another. It's either for drama, for humour, for revenge, for "empowerment" or just needless violence, but it's pretty much constant in popular media(and, when it's not men/women harming men, it's men harming themselves or being physically harmed by circumstan…
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:09 PM
2

Maybe it's a combination of the way men are treated in society(both in terms of disposability and expectation) or the way that men are taught to be soldiers pretty much since birth, and taught to be capable fighters in order to defend themselves(because no one else will) and women(because its a man's responsibility). Maybe there are just fewer female mass shooters because murderous women are far less likely to have the capability or competence of their male counter-parts. The US deliberately mil…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:05 AM
22

Why does this shit need to be a game or some indirect process. It doesn't matter how obvious a woman thinks she's being, the fact that she thinks it's up to a man to make the first move is the problem. What is wrong with a woman who just goes to a guy and says "hey, I like you, want to go out?" or "hey, you seem to like me, want to go out?". Are women, who are already in an established position of power in most sexual/romantic social situation(and who also run no risk of being labelled a creep o…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:48 PM
1

To me this would be the equivalent of men walking around with their nuts out, which is not something men can do either. They would become sex-offenders for it. And, while I certainly appreciate women walking around topless(it's legal in some places), breasts are not the same as men's flat chests. You also wouldn't see women charged with sexual harassment for ogling at men, but you certainly would see a lot of men charged or vilified for looking at topless women too.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:57 PM
2

I don't understand why a woman could complain about free condoms. Condoms are literally the least enjoyable form of contraception for men. They offer the least amount of friction/contact for men. How many women actually enjoy female condoms or IUDs? How many women would actually feel safe from STD's while relying on the pill? How many women would even accept to use a female condom, even if it was freely given to them? Most wouldn't and just demand that a man wear a male condom instead(and men wo…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:51 PM
4

Could you imagine the outrage of an island luxury resort advertised as a "white-only" resort? A place where white people could go to "not be inconvenienced by non-whites"?
/r/MensRights07/02/18 10:07 PM
3

"this is what feminism looks like"? What? No, feminists would be there protesting such a movement labelling anyone who attends as a misogynist, sex aggressor(because of the penis costumes), rape apologists and patriarchal oppressors.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 05:20 PM
7

I had a woman ruin a part of my life simply by pushing me out of my own network/circle of friends(she was pretty and sociable, so she became very popular very quickly). She was also a lot more proactive with the slander/gossiping(which I had no interested in doing). She was quickly turning all the girls in my group of friends against me. ("chicks before dicks" was a literal excuse one of my friends gave me when I asked her what was going on). When I tried to address the issue by confronting her …
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:21 PM
14

"no see! I just said men are trash because men just need to be changed! It has nothing to do with the way men are valued or how men could be disposed of, it's just about how we can indoctrinate men into femthink instead! So positive!"
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:06 PM
4

It's weird that he's talking about all of this as if it was some kind of new thing or if he had just discovered something new. It's neither. Misandry has been part of this culture for a very long time, even before feminism. Feminism would not have even existed if it wasn't for social misandry being a major foundation and stepping stone for their platform.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:51 PM
5

It's not just personal interest though, it's also a matter of personal freedom or men's lack there of when it comes to work and professions. How many men are there in the tech industry that are there only because they just had to choose something and that was just what they were good at or interested in at the time? I bet you there are a lot of men out there in the tech industry that hate their jobs or who were more interested in people than tech, but just didn't really have the options availabl…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 02:59 PM
29

It's crazy the amount of women who can just afford to take that kind of time off for protests over delusional entitlements.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:14 PM
30

This is kind of a no-brainer for anyone who pays attention to the way women treat/value men but it really speaks to the way women dehumanize, objectify and misprioritize men when it comes to sex/romance. They are not interested in who those man are, as much as they are interested in the value/power that attaching herself to a man gives her over other women. It creates a major disparity in selection for women and disparity in opportunity for men.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:44 PM
2

"the power dynamic was surreal, I really wanted her to like me" could literally be used by every guy in every sexual situation with a woman ever.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 04:34 PM
18

There is some overlap though. There are a lot of women who will listen to that music and still act offended when a non-rich, non-white, non-tall and/or non-successful man expresses attraction towards them. A lot of women will use the threat of "you are objectifying me", or vilification and slander, to push men away and then throw those concepts entirely out of the window when they want to compete for high-social status guy.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 03:01 PM
25

Except feminism pretty much defines objectification as any kind of heterosexual attraction to a woman from a man. Finding a woman physically attractive or wanting to have sex with her is the bar that feminists set for objectification.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 02:57 PM
4

Pretty good video. One additional aspect of this argument that is often neglected or omitted in this debate is how, even without the "right to vote", women still had social, economical and political power within society. The vast majority of the "head of households", a position of financial accountability and responsibility which was expected of men, would have still voted with women's interests at heart, because it was expected of men to look out and provide for women. Not only was that an inte…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:13 PM
2

Ironic part? This message has literally been the narrative on popular media for the past decade. Music videos, movies, television, comics, reality tv, etc. The women pandering/worshiping, or diva entitlement attitude, is all over the place.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 02:52 PM
6

Not only can feelings not be proven but feelings can also be entirely unreliable definition and prone to all kind of irrational biases. Without objectivity, any feeling can be justified and unjustly appropriated. If a woman sees an attractive man one way and an unattractive(or a woman) in another way, that dictates how she will feel about him. If a woman had some misconceived notions or prone to stereotyping, then that would affect how she feels about a situation(even if she is completely wrong …
/r/MensRights24/01/18 05:29 PM
6

Weird thing is, that post is basically establishing trauma as subjective. That, basically, any unrealistic or unhealthy pre-existing bias or prejudice you have, makes the trauma real. So, if you raise boys to not have this irrational fear of women or the female body, they cannot experience sexual/psychological trauma. If you raise girls to have this irrational fear and disdain of men or the male body, all they can experience is sexual/psychological trauma. They are inherently legitimizing misand…
/r/MensRights24/01/18 03:28 PM
1

You are creating an arbitrary line at the word "genitals". Even if breasts are not "genitals", there is no reason to treat genitals with that level of fear or disdain. I consider breasts to be an inherently sexual trait, and therefore equivalent to genitals in terms of "obscenity". They also happen to be external or protruding, much like the male genitals are, hence the comparison. You do not get to decide that women's breasts are not sexual or offensive. You are willing to treat male genitals t…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:39 PM
5

Seems pretty moot when not only do most men not expect any of those things anymore(and, even when they did, it was always a trade off, not something that men just expected because big bad menz) and just do it themselves but when she realistically wouldn't be willing to do any of that shit for your average, typical or "sensible" man. Hilarious response though.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:24 PM
6

That is a personal distinction you are making, based on your own personal biases.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 02:05 PM
35

Does that mean every woman should tape her tits down, so that I do not get offended and threatened by the sight of her physiology?
/r/MensRights22/01/18 09:56 PM
11

It's not just an entitlement to good sex, it's an entitlement to good sex on the first try and on demand. Like, the concept of teaching or practicing, or growing/improving sexually over time the course of a relationship, seems to be completely lost to so many young women. This "you either know how to please me before you meet me or you are not a man" attitude seems to be so common among young women. It's not just circular reasoning(expecting perfection without practice but you will not be grante…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 08:41 PM
2

What bothers me about this is that it's basically just playing into more gender double-standards and hypergamy. Does he think there are any women on earth who have to worry about any of these things that he's telling men they need to do, to be viewed as an acceptable or valuable human being? They don't. Telling men that they need to just work harder to live up to those double-standards might gain them noticeable improvements in their quality of life but it's still a step in the wrong direction. …
/r/MensRights17/01/18 09:26 PM
14

Women don't just have these conditions to determine those men as "suitable", they have conditions to determine those men as legitimate men/human beings. For a lot of women, men who fail to meet those ideals are entirely and thoroughly dehumanized and objectively desexualized. Any kind of sexual expression from those men is instantly regarded as an offence, because it in their eyes those men are not even allowed to have a sexual identity.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 07:10 PM
9

It's not just "men who look like women"... it's men who have some very deep-seated psychological issues that has them convinced they are or should be women. It's not just asking men to have sex with men, it's asking men to be okay with men who permanently mutilated their bodies to better resemble the physiology of a woman, or men who thought that this was a healthy course of action for them. It's not even just an issue of physical attraction or sexual orientation but it's also an issue of psycho…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:56 PM
0

I really don't agree with a lot of what Jordan says here at the start. His view of gender is incredibly pessimistic and derogatory towards men. He holds this massive double-standard between men and women in regards to how men should define/distinguish themselves. He reinforces this notion that men who fail to meet a particular ideal of masculinity are men-children who are horrible people, with every negative quality, with nothing to offer(basically echoing a very similar type of male-shaming tha…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:06 PM
5

What a ridiculous thing to get offended by. As if women never called people honey. He just came up with it in a vacuum.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:47 PM
4

"devolving"? That's literally all it was from the start. #metoo would have never been a thing if I didn't stem and depend on a culture of man-hating and fem-pandering.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 02:41 PM
9

That's not really all of it. There's other reasons for it. One, it's that women are far more likely to get positive reinforcement to playing the victims. When a man is victimize, people show him no sympathy and will think less of him for being victimized in the first place. So, his primary incentive is to not admit to being victimize or to not allow himself to be victimized. Complaining or bringing attention to his victimization will lower his social status, mainly to women, because women tend t…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:40 PM
12

Ha! first mistake you made was thinking that your typical woman would treat a guy working at a gas station like a real human being. It's your typical airhead bragsplaining post, with a twist of feminism to legitimize her misandry and narcissism.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:28 PM
9

The golden globes were pretty disgusting. Perfect example of misandry and anti-male propaganda taking the main-stream. It's disturbing to watch people just sit there and just champion this hateful sexist non-sense.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:34 PM
28

You mean as opposed to preaching spiteful, hateful, demeaning, dehumanizing anti-male rhetorics that indirectly gets absorbed by boys? Feminism already teaches boys to hate themselves, shut themselves away from women or that they deserved to be feared and segregated because of their gender(or that all of it is fair because of their cult's twisted view of history). What more could they possibly do?
/r/MensRights02/01/18 04:51 PM
1

He should have just used a strainer to show women leaving the work force because they want to be moms, want to spend more times with the kids, just want to be stay at home wives, don't want to date guys below their income or just want to "pursue other endeavours" that their boyfriends/husbands end up supporting them through. A strainer would show all the women who leave the work force for personal reasons, while leaving the men behind who simply cannot afford(financially, socially or personally)…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:35 PM
1

I'm glad they went gender neutral this time instead of women as victims vs men. That being said, it does seem pretty infantile. You're an adult. If someone shows up that isn't who they say they were or you just want to get out of the situation then just get out of the situation. If something feels weird, just say it feels weird and address the weirdness. If you don't feel safe, address why you don't feel safe(if its in your head, deal with that; if it is a real threat, deal with that or literall…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:28 PM
3

Feminists will rationalize those cases as "those are criminals, they deserve it". Which is not only fucked up, because rape was likely never intended to be part of their sentencing and no one would be okay with women being raped in prison, but also because it completely neglects the imbalances in the justice and social systems that would create a major disparity in the incarceration rates between men and women. Really, when feminists dismiss prison rape, they are basically just saying "we don't …
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:58 PM
2

I think if anything it just goes to show how people react to being touched/groped is entirely in how people are conditioned to react. Women are conditioned to have an extreme negative reaction to being touched by a man specifically. They are not conditioned to have that same reaction when other women touch them. Men, in contrast, are conditioned to have an extreme negative reaction to other men touching them and no have a positive/neutral reaction to women touching them. It's basically women can…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:29 PM
7

Feminism literally sells itself on the notion of gender equality, while acting in a very misandric and biased manner. Clearly this would be completely unequal to focus exclusively on women when female veterans would be less than 1% of homeless veterans.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:18 PM
1

It's not just false rape accusations that are a serious problem. Any kind of slander, false harassment cases, creep shaming or unsubstantiated claims of any form of "inappropriate behaviour" are all just as serious. Any type of male character assassination based solely on a woman's hateful, spiteful or disdainful predisposition towards men(or male heterosexuality) is part of this major systemic problem. False accusations of rape are just one extreme. They make the most waves, because rape is tre…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 04:04 PM
2

There are plenty of guys out there who are interested in gender equality, and she would probably be the first one to call those guys creepy, "fake nice guy" or "fake allies", or just accuse them of every crime/offence in the books for trying to talk to her. Also, if she was really that into feminism or gender equality, she would be doing the approaching(which she is actually in a position of major privilege), not waiting on men to approach her.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 02:22 PM
24

This is obviously fake. Women live in a patriarchy and are physically weaker on average, therefore they cannot hurt/kill men. Don't you know anything.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 10:04 PM
2

So, even if any of this actually worked and women actually did make the first moves(you could do all those things and they realistically still wouldn't)... this is basically just "put in all the prep work so that what women still don't have to put in any effort, take any risks or take charge in any way". It's not actually addressing the problem at all, it's just catering to the same old double-standards and romantic expectations on men. Funny how women don't have to dance(sucks for you if you do…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:49 PM
2

It's kind of sad, and ironic, that the primary facet of feminism is basically to get as many heterosexual women to treat heterosexual men the way heterosexual frat boys treated homosexual men in the 90's. Feminism is misandry. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:41 PM
10

False accusations don't generally make the head lines. False accusations destroy a man life long before any type of legality becomes relevant, if ever at all. Men need to worry about false accusations in all forms, not just rape cases. A woman could destroy a guy's life simply by saying "he looked at me the wrong way" or "he said something that offends me". They could fabricate any story they want about any form of negative behaviour. They could claim they feel "threatened" by a guy, just becaus…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:36 PM
8

Do you seriously think the defining factor was that was that the woman was wearing feminine clothing? You can't be serious.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:24 PM
9

How is it creepy? People are people, no matter what job they have. Attraction is attraction, no matter where they work. Every office is comprised of people who have romantic and sexual lives, because they are, in fact, people(not robots). People don't just stop loving, caring and fucking because they have jobs. The human race would go extinct otherwise. There is nothing creepy about two people getting into a relationship despite a common professional setting. You trying to dehumanize and desexua…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:53 PM
7

That's the dangerous thing about false accusations. A woman can make a false accusation without any truth/proof and, if the person who is accused/victimized by that woman tries to confront her about it, even just to say "what the hell? why are you doing this? Please stop", she can immediately hide behind the law and claim that as harassment, if not proof of guilt("see, he is harassing me now, just like before") or even intent to harm(even when there is obviously no intent, the fact that he is a …
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:47 PM
5

Pretty sure he didn't treat it like a dating website because the compliment was pretty neutral. Even if there was some kind of romantic interest, it's absolutely ridiculous to assume that a guy who approached a girl that way on linkedin disrespects or objectifies her in any way. You can respect people in both a professional and romantic setting at the same time.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:40 PM
36

It's funny how often "half her age" is brought up in her words. Not only is it irrelevant, because it's certainly not an objective law that older people can't get into relationships with people half their age when they are both clearly adults, but it also kind of completely discredits her own point in that, if age is such an objective, universal and determinant factor then a guy messaging a girl "half his age" probably wouldn't be doing it in a sexual or objectifying way.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:38 PM
7

Definitely seems fake but, even if it is, it doesn't really make any the message any less true. Homeless men and women would be treated differently, no doubt about it.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 02:23 PM
3

Pretty sure boys face bullying in a very disproportionate amount compared to girls, and the way we treat bullying against girls vs bullying against boys is very different. There is also this common misconception that bullying is just something boys do, or that only boys do to other boys, when in reality girls tend to be far more complicit in, instigative of or rewarding for bullying.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:54 PM
25

It's weird because before the age of viral videos, boys like him would be just told to shut up and stop being a pussy. People(men and women) would laugh at him for crying or showing any kind of weakness(even as a young boy). Boys who were assaulted, if not simply for being boys, were told to get bigger or stronger, otherwise they deserved their assault(literal victim blaming, coming from boys and girls) and that no one would ever love/respect/care about them because they were victims(and girls w…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:30 PM
1

If a woman bribes a man who is in power How do you define power? If she can bribe him, she has some form of power over him. He might have one form of power but she would also be in a position of power in her own way.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:36 PM
6

Feminim's definition of equality is not equal. It's that simple. It's "women are oppressed, men are oppressors". It's "Women are victims, men are their victimizers". Every sexist thought, action or crime that is done to benefit women, is viewed a legitimized and valiant. Everything that benefits men even when fair, just or egalitarian is viewed as horrible and detrimental to women and society. Every bad thing that happens in society is scoffed or down-played as "patriarchy", even when women are …
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:42 PM
13

That moment where you hate/resent heterosexual men to the point of constant shaming and vilification, but then have to do the same to women just to demonstrate that you're not a complete hypocrite/bigot. Good one.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 08:33 PM
2

If anything, I think the way most men(and women) react to the word feminism demonstrates that we don't need it, that it is alienating/exclusive and that it is destructive/toxic. People seem to have a much better reaction to the words "equality" or "egalitarian". Women fought for decades for the right to serve in combat Yeah, women all over the world were totally lining up to serve in combat.... not. I think the fact that it actually took decades for this to happen, despite feminism's political/s…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:18 PM
4

That's entirely a mental thing though. Men who don't fear for their safety around women are just delusional about the threat that women can pose(if you get shot or stabbed, your gender doesn't matter), not even counting the social/legal threats that women can pose to men specifically because they are in a position of power/privilege as women. Women who do fear men irrationally are also being just as delusional, because they think they are completely defenceless(which, maybe they are, like many m…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:12 PM
1

Didn't know this was happening. That's pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:09 PM
2

I agree. I've seen it happen first hand. It doesn't even have to be any kind of legal or official major accusation either. A woman can fabricate any claim she wants, even something as small or intangible as "he looked at me the wrong way", and it can ruin a guy's social and/or professional life. It's the devastation that women can bring on a guy just through gossip, slander and libel, not to mention the devastation she might cause to his personal/mental health(if you are disheartened watching it…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:55 PM
6

Jesus christ, the level of hamstering is beyond the charts. It's insane that anyone would even try to justify this with this type of rationalization. Truly demonstrates how feminism is a genuine obstacle to gender equality. And, another thing, people got offended at Trump saying "when you're famous they LET YOU grab them by the pussy". People always seem to neglect that first part. What Trump said or may have done was actually considerably less worse than what this girl did(and laughed about) be…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:20 PM
0

Is this person saying that women can't be responsible for a fiscal budget, or how ressources between certain diseases are distributed? Or is she saying that women can't be doctors or have any positive contributions to make against prostate cancer? Either way, not very progressive.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:06 PM
3

Are you saying women have it harder, or should be paid more, because people(men and women) find them more physically attractive? Are you saying that men don't face sexual harassment or don't face any assumptions of incompetence? The glass ceiling and the familial expectation boxes are fabrications of your own making. They don't exist. People don't expect women to be stay at home parents, because that would get them labelled as misogynistic. A lot of women do, however, end up wanting to be stay-a…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:50 PM
13

Pretty sure most women don't know what "daily sexual harassment" feels like either, that's just how a minority of hateful women choose to define all male heterosexual attention.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:20 PM
12

How silly of me, attempting to hold a civil discourse with you while enforcing the rules of our sub You are not enforcing the rules of /r/sex, you are enforcing your own personal biases. Also, cut the shit, you are not doing anyone any favours or attempting any type of "civil conversation" by flexing your mod privileges against a user or threatening that user instead of just silently deleting their contributions. The fact that other mods might have silently deleted something they personally didn…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:29 PM
1

Females are more inclined to be social, they want to form bonds and friendships I'm not sure if it's an innate thing that women just want to be more social, I just think social opportunities come easier for women than it comes to men. People just tend to be far more friendly, inclusive and open with women/girls, than they generally are with men/boys. People generally go far more out of their way to be nice or avoid offending girls than they do with boys. Bullying is also far more of an issue tow…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:47 PM
1

People are often very quick to vilify men for trying too hard to initiate sex or interactions with women but, at the same time, no one really talks about the ridiculous pressure that is put on men to have sex and successfully approach women as well, explicitly by women. Women expect men to be the assertive male, who leads in every aspect of sex and relationships. If you don't have that, you may as well be a eunuch because that's how most women will treat you. If you haven't had sex by the time y…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:58 PM
3

"This Morning's White-Led Today Show Is Yet Another Reminder That We Don't Need These Black People" Because that doesn't sound hateful as fuck, right?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:09 PM
1

This isn't really something that's new or just started happening this year. This is just something that is getting some form of media attention right now because it's happening so much and to higher profile people. Just think how many forms of slander ruin men's lives every day, without any of it ever getting noticed(let alone going to court or where some form of justice is met).
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:43 PM
3

Patriarchy is a fallacy. It presumes that all men are in a position of power/authority, as individuals and as a collective, and that all men are self-serving or serving the interests of other men. None of which is actually even remotely true. It's the delusion misandric people use when they want to blame all men or justify their hatred of all men.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:38 PM
13

Why not just tell them to not hate men instead or to not resent/vilify male heterosexual attraction? A men wouldn't react so this much hostility to a woman taking a treadmill behind them or checking them out. Women wouldn't react with so much hostility to another woman taking a treadmill behind them or checking them out. So, clearly this objection is personally targeted towards men, from women, and it doesn't stem from any kind of unilateral system of etiquette.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:33 PM
2

Just things feminists say.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 02:25 PM
4

my first encounter with an MRA was exactly this How would you know that was your first encounter with an MRA. The vast majority of mens rights advocates don't advocate that they are "MRA's". They keep that title to themselves because it's something they will be attacked and slandered for.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 03:12 PM
1

men stop noticing they exist, women complain men no longer notice they exist. Things is, men don't stop noticing that they exist, they are just afraid to show any interest or desire because that will get them labelled as a creep, objectifier or misogynist. All women have to do is make the first step and let them know its okay to be a man and want to have sex with women. They won't do that though, because that's "not feminine"(aka, if men are meek then they are unattractive/worthless), because th…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 06:43 PM
1

Basically, she wants all the positives of gynocentrism without any of the negatives and her answer is to call/treat all the men there as asexual eunuchs. They aren't, and never will be, you're just treating them that way because they aren't doing the macho things you expect them to do. They still have dicks and still want to use them, they have just been told that every feeling or desire they have is wrong, hostile or dangerous. If this woman ever wanted attention from men, all she would have to…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 06:39 PM
5

Male feminist is just another term for victim. They are men who have been shamed, virtually since birth, to believe that their very nature is hostile and bothersome to every woman(including every woman they will ever love, desire or wish to be loved by). They are men who have internalize systematic hate and belittlement, and who think themselves so damaged and wrongful that seeking female absolution and approval becomes their personal path to what they believe is acceptance and personal worth. M…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:39 PM
28

"I didn’t understand what it’s like to be groped, to be harassed, to be interrupted, talked over, paid less, you know, pushed around, belittled." I like how he's using his own ignorance and a justification for his argument. Not only has he probably faced discrimination himself and he's staying purposefully ignorant of it but everything mentioned here are things that your typical nerdy, shy, introverted, short, pacifist and/or nice guy has experienced his entire life. It's something that those gu…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:18 PM
1

These are some pretty clear cut results of double-standards. It's not really anything surprising to anyone here but you couldn't really paint a clearer disparity between the two. Great stuff.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 02:24 PM
65

What is at the root of the problem? Female power/privilege(both in and out of the work place). Entitlement. Expecting special treatment compared to men. People treating women with kid cloves, and being slandered as a misogynist or women-hater for not doing so. Expecting to have their authority on all things respected at all times, regardless of validity, because female empowerment and it's mansplaining if you don't. Conditioning men for service in their personal lives, also makes them better emp…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 04:17 PM
36

Calling men's rights a hate sub would be like saying that /r/atheism is a hate sub because the majority of the population are devout christians.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 03:30 PM
1

Movie/music stars are generally not physically strong, so it's more about women attributing value on popularity/status above all else. And, honestly, I have no idea how you could have gotten that men only want women for their bodies. There's nothing in what I said that indicates as much, and certainly isn't true for men within the STEM community. If anything, men are typically punished and vilified for their sentimentality, devotion or altruism towards women. Men who do not "just want women for …
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:15 PM
10

The gender gap in tech is largely due to sexism... against men. Women don't want to be in tech because most women still have this very strong anti-male predisposition, specifically towards nerdy/meek men. Most women see math and sciences are boring and unattractive. If girls treated engineers like they treated rock and movie stars, there wouldn't be any gaps in science.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:40 PM
2

Not only is it a disgusting mentality that she actually wants men to live in fear of women, or crimes committed by women(which is not only a horrible thing to wish on men but a clear attempt to legitimize false accusations), but this notion that men living in fear is somehow good for women is also completely wrong. Innocent men being afraid doesn't stop rape. Rapists are not going to be afraid of false accusations if they aren't afraid of real accusations. The only thing this accomplishes is hur…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 02:35 PM
1

I'm an actual man, more than twice your age. So please educate me, what am I a victim of? Tell me about my suffering.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 09:34 PM
1

Both are true. You are the only one who spoke as if your experiences were absolute and infallible.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 09:32 PM
1

Just because you don't feel victimized, doesn't mean that you aren't or that others aren't.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:43 PM
2

If the roles were reversed it would play out like this. Conan: "xbox one x, it's like grabbing a girl by the pussy!". George St-Pierre proceeds to grab female staff member by the pussy. Conan: "That was awesome!". Conan and GSP proceed to physically molest female staff member as she does her best to defend herself. Hilarious skit/advertising am I right?!? Oh, no, wait, this would literally go down as the most horrible thing televised since the invention of television(even though sexual/physical …
/r/MensRights07/11/17 08:00 PM
10

It kind of is though. Kicking a guy in the genitals is sexual assault. You wouldn't think it's okay to shove a shoe up a woman's cunt. It certainly wouldn't be considered a prime-time joke. At the very least, it is trivializing violence against men, which isn't really okay either.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:08 PM
14

What is stupid about that argument is that it demonstrates that men and women are conditioned differently to react to "objectification"(or, really, just attraction or pedestalization from the opposite sex) and that this disparity is entirely socially constructed(unless women are just naturally/innately predisposed to misandry, which doesn't really seem plausible). It demonstrates that men are socially conditioned to embrace female attraction, attention and/or pedestalization under all circumstan…
/r/MensRights07/11/17 03:55 PM
2

That man has views and opinions... punch him until he learns his place! -Feminism
/r/MensRights06/11/17 03:36 PM
3

Feminists demand a climate where the accused are guilty until proven innocent, which is where things are now in Hollywood apparently. All she's doing here is pointing out all the due diligence that should have been taken but wasn't, and complaining that it's a gender problem and another sign of sexism despite the fact that women have been getting away with unsupported/false claim against men in hollywood for quite some time now. It's cherry picking the evidence, as always.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 01:57 PM
11

Are they neglecting the fact that women also have a more support from their peers than men would, or that women would also be heavily supported by men? "What's her's is her's and what's his is also her's" is not a rare situation for a lot of people. It's a lot easier to pay off a student dept when you get into a relationship and your boyfriend pays for everything and all your savings go to that dept, or when you enter a relationship with the expectation that this debt be consolidated. Same goes …
/r/MensRights02/11/17 01:51 PM
1

That's awesome but, honestly, why couldn't it just say "restroom". If it's all gender, then saying all gender is not necessary.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 01:43 PM
1

It's sad because most men don't even care that much about dancing the way women obsess with it. It really speaks volume about power and privilege when men would pay more to go somewhere just for a chance to interact with women, in a social climate that is increasingly growing hostile towards men who try to approach women in public venues that are not nightclubs. Not only do they have to pay more but they have to pay more for an event they don't care for, with fewer and fewer alternative venues a…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:51 PM
4

Not really sure it's "thought provoking". It's not really anything new and even falls into some old tropes.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:53 PM
3

One easy way to know if it is or isn't harassment is, how would this woman feel if another woman approached her in the same way or with the same interests. If a woman would be fine with another woman approaching her in public, and she has a very different disposition towards men, than the problem is not the men who approach her but rather her disposition towards men. It's a double-standard that stems from sexism and prejudice. The act of harassment is gender neutral, not gender specific. If wome…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:25 PM
3

It's kind of funny, how "stay in the kitchen" could have essentially been worded as "stay in your safe space"(which is pretty ironic, considering where feminism is today). It was basically men telling women to keep out of danger or keep out of difficult situations, so that other men may carry those burdens. It was as much about protecting women(female privilege) as it may have been derogatory. Man up is still man up, because feminism never considered this a problem worth addressing. It's somethi…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:13 PM
1

men and women can't share bedroom space Why not?
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:06 PM
1

It's not really a feminist thing, it's more of a cultural thing that predates feminism. And, if you were to really break it down, it really all comes down to gender roles. Women mature faster sexually, because women are socially, romantically and sexually privileged. They just have a lot more opportunities coming to them than man would, and don't have to work for those opportunities the way a man would(a man with no experience with women doesn't get very far, a woman with no experience with men …
/r/MensRights30/10/17 03:02 PM
2

There needs to be more genderless domestic violence shelters, not more gender driven domestic violence shelters.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 02:51 PM
3

I hate this argument of "women are always forced to be caretakers", when you consider the fact that women are in an absolute position of power when it comes to sex, romance and social opportunities. Women are choosing men who make more money than then, specifically because they are in a better financial position than them and often specifically so that they can stop working while still maintain the same lifestyle. Women have all the power to date men who make less money, and continue to work the…
/r/MensRights26/10/17 06:14 PM
2

holy shit... was not expecting her to turn on her audience like that. Would have been really easy for her to just play along and nod. I can't speak to anything else she's ever done but that would pretty awesome.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 06:56 PM
41

It's both. Women are conditioned to have this overly negative response to male attention because they are in a position of power and privilege when it comes to sex, romance and dating. They are treated like rockstar, simply because they are women, and react negatively to male attention because they see themselves as higher-worth or constantly burdened by the attention and devotion of strangers they see as beneath them. It's like rich people with an endless supply of money getting aggravated and …
/r/MensRights24/10/17 03:50 PM
3

Literally every women's issues big red brought up, like more men being in top positions or women being harassed by men, could also be explained through female privileges, higher social value given to women and men having to compete harder their entire lives to provide for women(also because women expect them to lead and take charge). Everything she claims feminism is still needed for could be blamed on "matriarchy". It's ridiculous just how hateful and oblivious big red is about men, or how igno…
/r/MensRights24/10/17 03:01 PM
127

It's almost as if men were not conditioned to respond to female attention with irrational fear, hatred, disdain and hostility, the way women are conditioned to respond to male attention.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 02:21 PM
43

Basically, "how to teach your son he's a monstrous piece of shit for having a penis based on an entirely fabricated and unrealistic set of privileges that she wrongfully believes men benefit from". Also, arguably, child abuse.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 02:12 PM
9

Not all heroes wear capes.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:14 PM
1

This is a common way for feminists to avoid taking responsibility for their own complicity in gender inequality and their own actions. They can't accept that women do, in fact, have power and privilege in society and don't want to do anything about it. They also cannot accept anything that contradicts their narrative of female oppression by men.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:13 PM
3

Pretty sure that isn't true at all because you would never see the opposite, even in an office where the workforce is 95% male.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:40 PM
3

It isn't really a legit goal when hateful women twist the definition of harassment to fit their own whims, or when they use this "goal" to promote further prejudice against men. It's also not really a legit goal when they do it at the expense of men, or when they do it with the intent of silencing or excluding men.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 05:53 PM
1

It was a campaign for anybody to come out No, it wasn't. It was explicitly framed as a women vs men movement. It was presented as "women, please tell everyone how evil men are". That was the stated intent behind the hashtag. It's just another extension of the "teach men not to rape" sexist initiatives.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 04:36 PM
1

I don't even think this was a control issue. I imagine a woman in her position probably wouldn't have had any issues manipulating a guy like that, if not simply because he was(as she puts it) inexperienced with women or because of the social pull/ease that she would have benefited from as a woman. She was also seemingly working very hard to belittle this guy with his peers every chance she got. This is more an issue of a pitiful insecure and hateful woman who cannot deal with a "nerdy white male…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 04:23 PM
1

Me making a facebook status about it doesn't change anything about the intent behind the hashtag. It doesn't change the fact that it stems from a sentiment of misandry. Even if my #hastag was entirely well received(which, realistically, wouldn't), it still doesn't mean that the #hashtag was ever intended to be inclusive to men or wasn't purposefully intended to victimize women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 04:18 PM
2

There are a lot of men who have experienced different forms of harassment or abuse. Hell, I have been groped in the work place by women. That's what makes the #metoo so sexist in the first place. It's another attempt to cohort sexual abuse into this crime that only men do and only women are victims of. It's silencing men for the benefit of women, and vilifying the male gender for the benefit of women.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 03:30 PM
9

Women at his office created a hostile work environment for him, instead of creating a big drama out of it, he just kept his interactions with them to a minimum, gave them some disapproving looks when they were obviously being insincere with him and vented about it anonymously on the internet. All understandable and harmless ways to deal with a hostile work environment and harassment(both emotional and sexual harassment, if you consider virgin shaming as sexual harassment, which I do) in the work…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 02:43 PM
1

This story is pretty disturbing. Here you have a handful of very closed-minded judgemental and superficial women who have basically found every way to make a hostile work environment for this guy. It's like the cool girls bullying the shy awkward nerd in high-school, only now that guy's professional life and livelihood was also at stake. It's disturbing that there are even still women who think like that. It's even more disturbing that these women actually got hired despite still being stuck in …
/r/MensRights19/10/17 02:38 PM
3

Jesus christ, I cannot even imagine the level of shit storm this story would have reached if the genders were reversed. "when you tell him to cheer up he gets angry and gives you these silly "death stares" Had the genders been reversed, this would have qualified as harassment. There are men who have literally been fired for telling women to cheer up, because those women complained to HR, even though those men probably meant it in an empathetic/positive way(And, I guarantee you, these women were …
/r/MensRights19/10/17 02:20 PM
2

If only society taught men not to rape!!
/r/MensRights18/10/17 06:53 PM
5

Nah, they are just offended by it when it's used by a man. It doesn't even matter if it's used in the proper context. The "offence" feminists take to the word female is just an shaming tactic that feminists pull out whenever they want to fabricate an easy adhominem. They are totally fine when other women use the word female, even when it's used to explicitely discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 02:53 PM
9

I strongly disagree with this notion that "women have to deal with worse every day". This is a very toxic misconception and exaggeration. Women reacting more negatively to male attention due to personal/social prejudices towards male attention, compared to how men react to female attention, does not make it objectively worse. It is a chosen reaction. Women are incentivized to victimize themselves at the expense of men, by purposefully misinterpreting, exaggerating or falsifying their experiences…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 02:04 PM
15

No man would prefer a robot over a real woman but men do not have the options and opportunities that women have, and men do not have the same risks that women have when it comes to sex and dating. Women take men for granted, because men are socialize to pursue them. Women take sex for granted, because they are socially, romantically and sexually valued simply because they are women. Women don't have to worry about false accusations or social vilification at the whims and feelings of the opposite…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:21 PM
2

Firstly, we have every right to question how you "feel". Feelings are unreliable and the person feeling them is not always the most reliable judge of their own feelings. The notion that feelings are infallible and unquestionable isn't just wrong, it is absolutely dangerous in the wrong circumstances. Men's lives are literally made or destroyed based on how women "feel". Secondly, how much of that fear is actually justified and rational? It is not uncommon for women to build an unhealthy fear of …
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:24 PM
16

Should have started with "I'm not sexist but..." Her post is basically "I'm not sexist but fuck men, issues affecting men and discussions that include or don't alienate/vilify men".
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:56 PM
56

It's funny how bigoted and sexist women can be, without even the slightest hint of self-awareness or shame. "Feminism is about gender equality but keep the apartheid when it comes to issues I want to just make about women!". "Men's issues are important and totally need to be discussed, so watch me go out of my way to explicitly not discuss those issues and make them all about women so that those issues continue to be ignored".
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:55 PM
2

Both. Feminism is harmful on its own, because it is inherently misandric and manipulating data to paint a false narrative in order to promote and perpetuate itself. It is also largely dependent on pre-existing systematic forms of misandry and preferential treatment for women. It has gained a platform off of pre-existing forms of power and privilege that benefit women, and then worked tirelessly to maintain and expend those platforms by any means necessary. It flourished in pre-existing systemati…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:43 PM
1

"Nothing can be done about it", even when plenty can be done about it, has been the lazy convenient excuse behind every form of misandry that people either don't care about or just don't want to fix because it benefits them.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:18 PM
32

Just because you don't recognize men as human beings, doesn't mean they weren't already.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:16 PM
1

I don't think anyone here has ever argued that feminism was the sole source of discrimination or prejudice against men. Most people here hate feminism because it is either one of the loudest sources of discrimination and prejudice towards men or because it is selectively ignoring existing sources of discrimination and prejudice either out of moral/ethical inconsistency, sexism or to paint this false narrative of female oppression.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:46 PM
461

40% of reported domestic violence is suffered by men. Real number I assume is much higher, since men would grossly under-report domestic violence and women would be far more likely to falsely report domestic violence.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:40 PM
3

how do you cope? When it comes to dealing with people in a personal basis? I assume like most men do, by learning to be quiet and keeping my views or feelings to myself. Just in a general basis? By doing your best to keep moving forward. Find other things to focus on(like work, relationships or hobbies). how can I support men's rights as a female Just empathize with men. Treat men how you would like to be treated. Speak out whenever you can, if you can(not just because you are in a position to d…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 02:33 PM
4

But no men are hostile towards women! A lot less than what most people make it out to be and it's nowhere near the level of systematic misandry that's ingrained into most of our society.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:51 PM
2

it’s men who have enforced society’s rules regarding gender roles That's one of the most idiotic things I've heard in a while and it's funny that you based your entire ideology on the premise that it is men who enforce gender roles on other men. This very article demonstrates the complete opposite. Women predominantly enforce gender roles on men, because everything about men's live's revolves around the pursuit of love, sex and companionship from women(at least for 95% of men who are heterosexua…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 02:43 PM
2

The way men are treated is a factor, the way depression/pain in men is treated is a factor but the main factor is, when it really comes down to it, just a matter of competence. Women don't go for mass shootings because most have no clue how to defend themselves, let alone shoot things. Most women don't even want to learn how to defend themselves, because they expect to live in a world that is free of crime or just expect men to defend them when needed. If women were expected to defend themselves…
/r/MensRights06/10/17 09:00 PM
9

if that doesn't work, telling them to fuck off might end up with you sitting out this flight. Bullshit. If he tried to flex any kind of power like that just over some personal grudge, other people would immediately notice. Others would intervene and he would most likely be fired. And, even if he was some kind of solo agent able to exert that kind of power independently without anyone noticing, it is still not right to completely dehumanize him. Him asking someone out is fine. Flexing power to ex…
/r/MensRights06/10/17 06:07 PM
7

authority-subject What "authority-subject relationship"? Even if he wanted to, he doesn't have any power to exercise on her either way as a TSA agent. Even if he did have some form of power over her and in a position to exercise it, he's also a person too. You are basically saying that any man in a position of "power" can never express any interest in women, and may as well just be eunuchs or unfeeling robots. Imagine if that was the other way around, if men were instantly offended and appalled …
/r/MensRights06/10/17 02:17 PM
14

I was kind of looking forward to the Mrs Marvel movie. Now, not so much. Her attitude on men, or male interest, is disgusting and completely disturbing.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 02:14 PM
1

Those people felt like they were born the wrong sex No one with a gender identity disorder is "born" thinking they were of the wrong sex. This is something that people with gender identity disorders develop. Typically in their early childhood development(when they are most vulnerable). They feel they are of the wrong "sex" because they physically internalize gender roles, based on incredibly sexist misconceptions about genders. Not only is this view of gender entirely unhealthy(inability to diff…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 07:24 PM
1

A sex change operation most definitely changes a person's sex. That is delusional. It is a fallacy. You cannot change someone's gender, short of transplanting them into another body or rebuilding their entire body down to very strain of DNA. "Sex change" does not change your sex, it just makes you look like the other sex. Melanin skin treatments wouldn't make you "black", just because you imitated that skin pigment, nor should you artificially alter the melanin content of your skin just because …
/r/MensRights05/10/17 06:18 PM
1

A sex change operation doesn't actually change anyone's sex, it just mutilates one person's sexual organs to resemble another's. No amount of surgery could turn a dog into a cat, but you certainly could make something that resembles a cat from a dog or vice versa if you tried hard enough. A woman who is a "tomboy" is still a woman, who is acting like a woman because she is a woman and therefore anything she does are the actions of a woman. The term "tomboy" simply stems from the social expectati…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 01:09 PM
5

There is likely a very strong correlation between a lot of men's rights issues and the huge disparity between MtF and FtM surgeries. Male disposability, male vilification, male guilt, female privilege and innate female social/sexual worth are all very strong social factors that could be driving this massive disparity between men and women with gender identity disorders.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 05:43 PM
1

Gender is not culture dependent. Gender role is culture dependent. "Role" being the key word. Sex and gender are interchangeable terms. Gender roles could be referred to as sex roles. You cannot change your sex/gender. They are the same. You can act however you want and have those actions qualified as "masculine" or "feminine" by your culture, or you can look any way you want and have that appearance associated to "masculine" or "feminine", but neither change your sex/gender. A man acting in a w…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:26 PM
1

One is real and one is made up?
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:24 PM
1

*Roles.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 08:49 PM
1

It's not just a "live and let live" problem. If people were that irrationally uncomfortable around black or white people because of their skin color, you wouldn't use that to legitimize "black only" or "white only" sections. You would tell those people "get over it" and "don't be an asshole".
/r/MensRights03/10/17 07:00 PM
1

What i am saying is that people need to get over their gender driven prejudices and double-standards. Feeling this irrationally insecure at the prospect of sweating near people from the opposite sex is a mental/social problem and should be treated as such.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 06:52 PM
10

If I want my son to love and respect women, I am going to have to teach him to embrace – and ideally appreciate – “girlish” things. You know what's going to happen? He's going to do these things and then find himself in a position where all the girls stop taking him seriously, treat him like their gay best friend, delegitimize and/or emasculate him. Girls are going to treat him like shit for being a man "acting like a woman", if not just outright vilify him(especially if he tries to express any …
/r/MensRights03/10/17 06:18 PM
8

Except for that one " Masculinity is so often about hiding those tears and being stoic in times of tragedy and might be part of the reason so many of these mass shooting are perpetrated by lonely males." line that ruins the whole post.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 05:54 PM
11

If every shooter involved in every mass shooting was a women, feminists would still be calling it a result of toxic masculinity and further proof of female oppression or subjugation.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 05:53 PM
1

Sexual attraction has nothing to do with learned behaviours or forced segregation. Homosexual men and women share washrooms without any issue, and there are no reasons why men and women cannot do the same. Perceptions of perfections being shattered by the fact that people sweat or shit is literally the most ridiculous and infantile justification for segregation. If it makes people "uncomfortable", that is 100% their own choice or their own personal hangup to get over. If you were in a washroom a…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 03:03 PM
2

If there is any reason why there are more men than women involved with shootings(though, to debunk her argument, there certainly has been women involved with mass shootings), it would probably boil down to competence and the general expectations that women place on men to be competent. These mass shootings are not a problem of power+masculinity or men+violence but, rather, a problem of weapon of mass carnage+competence+crazy. There are definitely fewer women involved in shootings, not because th…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:49 PM
1

You are missing the point. You don't need dinner for any of that and if she's making the argument of "you never take me out to dinner anymore", I guarantee you it's not about his time or the intimacy because you can literally get that anywhere else. It's about the entitlement, it's about the prestige and it's about this toxic attitude of "I am a woman, therefore I must be treated out like a queen(or, more appropriately, a child)".
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:32 PM
2

self conscious around members of the opposite sex So they have personal hangups which are entirely and exclusively based on gender? It may not be prejudiced but it sure sounds like a form of sexism. Imagine if someone said "some people are more self-counscious around black people and might not want to get all sweaty or nasty in front of them"? Would that be a legitimate excuse to you for racially segregated gyms? No, it wouldn't. People would just tell you "get the fuck over it, there's literall…
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:28 PM
2

It makes her feel desired and she likes the one on one. Desired through financial compensation? That's not really a healthy way to feel desired. Either way, pretty sure you can feel loved and desired without dinners or while still paying for dinners yourself.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 01:19 PM
77

"you never take me to dinner anymore". Like, apparently taking the initiative or taking herself out for dinner is out of the question? Not going out for dinner is justification for cheating? She can't have a relationship without dinner? What does dinner even have to do with sex? It's like, does she not understand the level of entitlement, irrationality and pettiness you need to make a statement like that, let alone as a justification for cheating? Worst part is that I actually know women with th…
/r/MensRights02/10/17 06:53 PM
31

It is discriminatory even if a men's only area exists, which would also be discriminatory by definition. More discrimination doesn't become justified by more discrimination. A "white's only" washroom doesn't become less racist, just because there's also a "black's only" washroom.
/r/MensRights02/10/17 01:20 PM
1

I would expect more integrity about game of thrones from r/freefolk than from r/twoxchromosomes.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 02:56 PM
0

You are truly underestimating the power of slander and alienation. A kid will eventually lose interest or care for anyone they don't spend time with. They move on. Forget who those people are or what they mean.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 08:15 PM
3

The ultimate irony? The fact that women can get away with doing shit like this, demonstrates that they are in a position of power, therefore invaliding their own argument. Does she also not understand how hateful, presumptuous and sexist it is to just state that the male gender is just synonymous to harassment? That is absolutely prejudice, by the truest definition of the word.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:29 PM
6

It wouldn't just be rich women who would have benefited from this cultural expectation. Men's cultural or courting obligations to women generally transcend income or wealth. Women are considered the protected class regardless of their income(if they are even expected to have an income in the first place). Poor women who would not be able to afford vehicles would still be able to find men to drive them, whether out of social/cultural obligation or romantic devotion/demonstration(a form of transpo…
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:44 PM
3

Does this also include every case of women mutilating a man for cheating? Because cheating is typically just another manifestation of rejection.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 04:56 PM
16

I guarantee you there are a lot of women there who would still prefer to not have to drive anywhere and be able to systematically pass that obligation onto men. This is a good thing but women not driving there wasn't as black and white of an issue as "evil men forcing helpless women not to drive".
/r/MensRights27/09/17 03:45 PM
3

equivocating away rape. Treating female-on-male rape as rape is apparently destroying feminism's definition of rape. Goodness forbid we treat men as human beings, actually approached rape from a perspective of gender equality or took false rape accusations that destroy people's lives seriously. denying systemic oppression of women Because there is no systemic oppression of women? Women are not oppressed. They are, if anything, systematically privileged in virtually all ways over men.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 03:28 PM
2

"you realize women were socially irrelevant for most of history" I don't know how delusional you have to be to believe this statement. Women have never been irrelevant, in any capacity. There has always been power and control in womanhood. Not just in the obvious ways, like female royalty or strong women across history but just women as a collective just having power over men and children in their lives. Throughout all of human history, you will find a very wide history of men dying to provide, …
/r/MensRights18/09/17 01:26 PM
4

"Multi-racial" "White's only" Funny how wrong that is when you put it in any other context.
/r/MensRights15/09/17 08:28 PM
2

And, remember, men only resort to fighting ways because of toxic masculinity. It is never to protect women, nor is it ever to serve women's interests in any capacity. It is also always never with the support of women but against it, because we all know all women are against wars and sending their sons/brothers to die for their benefit.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 08:20 PM
43

So much for "If women were in charge there would be no wars".
/r/MensRights13/09/17 08:17 PM
10

Again, this comes down to selection or personal choice from women. Schools are businesses. They aren't there to insure the success of future generations, they are there to make money. Do you think schools care that there is no real world demand for a certain field? No, they will take you money and train you for any job you want, regardless of demand. And, what kind of jobs are women most likely going to go for? High demand, high risk or high money but low status jobs? No. They want the fun safe …
/r/MensRights12/09/17 02:54 PM
6

Programs meant to encourage women in STEM are infective specifically because women are the problem, and because such programs are trying to encourage women through financial incentives instead of actually addressing the negative prejudices that most women have towards STEM(mainly because they consider it nerdy and boring grunt work). That's not going to work. You could have every financial incentive you want to get women to be garbage collectors, and you still wouldn't have any women who make us…
/r/MensRights11/09/17 05:07 PM
7

If it systematically benefits women, then it is a female privilege. If it systematically benefits men, then it is a male privilege. That is the damn definition of the word "privilege". There may be detrimental aspects of privilege but there is no such thing as "negative privilege".
/r/MensRights11/09/17 03:07 PM
3

It's pretty ironic that if you approach every feminist "issue" with the premise that men and women are inherently equal, they all stop making any kind of sense and immediately appear completely unequal in intent and result.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:08 PM
9

So many self-contradictions in this article. So frustratingly idiotic and just disturbingly wrong on so many level. She also sounds about as racist as she sounds sexist. And yet, completely typical.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:55 PM
5

Numbers for catcalling are mostly exaggerated and malicious intent behind catcalling are mostly projected by women with irrational fears/hatred of male attention. Catcalling does happen but it is nowhere near the systematic problem that feminists make it out to be. If you were to really cut through the bullshit, I would wager women catcall men as often(if not more so) and far more maliciously(without any romantic or sexual interest but just to gaud men with false interest) than there are men who…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:39 PM
1

There is no pressure on women to be any of those things, they just do it because it's easier, and because most women feel they can get everything they want without having to earn it themselves by jumping onto richer/higher status men.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 02:15 PM
2

Gender dynamics are still alive and going stronger than they have ever been, the only difference now is that they are simply and exclusively one-sided. Men still have to live by the gender dynamics imposed by women, and no one wants to hold women accountable for this. Women do not have to live by those same gender dynamics, because anyone who would expect women to follow gender dynamics would be instantly reprimanded and vilified.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:37 PM
2

It's fucking fiction. Writers can literally depict anyone they want in any way. It's just as false to assume that men would resort to savagery because they are men than it is to assume that women would not because they are not. Both are also completely sexist.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:34 PM
11

Feminism hasn't really "destroyed" gender dynamics. It still completely supports gender dynamics that benefit women, and every gender dynamic in which women are privileged or in a position of power/authority.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:27 PM
2

It's not like a larger sample size would produce any different results though. This is essentially common knowledge that has already been established.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 07:24 PM
1

Not sure it's explicitly a problem of female nature but, rather, human nature when in a position of power and privilege, and a social failure in holding women accountable for pretty much anything.
/r/MGTOW05/09/17 04:03 PM
2

I hate this argument of "we should encourage more men to be stay at home fathers" from feminists, because its incredibly out of touch with reality. It doesn't matter how many positives there are for men to be stay at home fathers when it's just not an option for them. Most women don't want to date or have children with men with little or no careers or even men who would put their careers on hold. Most women want to be the ones who gets to stop working, spend time with their children and be suppo…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:25 PM
2

The most confusing thing about this is how hypocritical they actually are on this. There are actually a lot of men out there who like thicker women, which makes it far more of a "personal" preference than how women judge men on things like height or status. Not only that but physical fitness does also affect a relationship tremendously, in pretty much every regard. It affects health, it affects sex, it affects where you can go or what you can do. Obesity is also completely abnormal, some times t…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 03:01 PM
4

If there's any truth to it, that's pretty great on the girls for stranding up for the boys.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 02:50 PM
5

Gender roles are a social construct. Gender is what you are whether you accept it or not. Basing "gender" on gender roles is also a major cognitive fallacy.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:32 PM
2

Not sure there is even an "official" stance on this. MRA's are not a monolith. I think most people who consider themselves MRA's go with the scientifically or biologically correct definition of gender though, and believe that gender identity disorder is mainly a mental/psychological problem.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:30 PM
1

It kind of is though
/r/MensRights28/08/17 03:42 PM
13

Any decent human being would have done the same Not too sure about that one. How often do you really see or hear about women putting their lives at risk to save someone(especially a man)? I am fairly certain if you were to compare the data, men do this far more often than women do, or women would put their own safety above another's far more often. There's a definite difference here between how men and women are conditioned to respond to danger. Dangerous jobs like these are still entirely male …
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:58 PM
2

If you are on Tinder, you are looking for a hookup. This is a fallacy, for every dating site and every night club. People go to where people are to meet people. That's the only truth there is to dating. if they are willing to put out after a brief meeting That's personal opinions but, to me, another complete fallacy. If a man is capable of considering a relationship with someone he had sex with on a first date, so can a woman. Different people see sex, hookups and dating differently. I would hav…
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:29 PM
6

I mean, there are guys on tinder looking for relationships and who have no problems with commitment. The problem isn't the app. Every dating site on the planet runs the full gamut, from guys looking for one night stands to guys looking for a life-long partner. You can find guys looking for commitments in night clubs and guys looking for one night stands in libraries. The problem is how these women tend to judge and value men. I guarantee you they are literally swiping left on every possible matc…
/r/MensRights24/08/17 06:00 PM
2

Has any judged ever taken into consideration the welfare of a man's child before sentencing them?
/r/MensRights24/08/17 04:34 PM
2

"but it's not a zero sum game!!!!" -feminists
/r/MensRights24/08/17 02:09 PM
5

"girls don't want to challenge themselves with legos, so lets punish the boys!" Feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 02:04 PM
6

Weak parenting of boys is creating a generation of entitled brats who think they are owed the world and can lash out in violence when they do not get their way, Does this mean that more parents are starting to treat their boys the same way they have been treating their girls for countless generations now? Could it be? I find that very hard to believe, because all the data still suggests that boys are treated far less fairly/nicely than girls by their parents, but maybe things are starting to cha…
/r/MensRights24/08/17 01:24 PM
3

I tend to be skeptical until he proves he can walk to walk Translation: I don't trust men to hate men enough to participate in my vision of female solidarity until they demonstrate that they favor women above all in any/all matters of life. It's like nice guys Translation: Men who are frustrated at being devalued or unvalued for being good men are just horrible people in disguise, and niceness is weakness and boring anyway so fuck men for thinking otherwise. When I'm at a BLM rallies and the lik…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:49 PM
2

The more disturbing thing about this is that there are actually a lot of reasons to be against fat acceptance. Obesity is actually a health, safety and quality of life concern. Height is none of those things. It doesn't affect any aspects of any relationships, unless the high difference is extreme one way or another(like over a foot in difference). Equal heights should be optimal between men and women and, yet, this is considered a universal impossibility from women. The social/cultural prejudic…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:19 PM
3

But... there is a huge demand for Dave Chapelle and Chris Rock. Is there really any demand for any material Amy Schumer plagiarizes?
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:20 PM
9

I have yet to meet a single woman who didn't make height an issue, which means it's not just a "personal" preference(height, despite all counter-reasoning, seems to be the most strongly persistent factor among women). Most women I have ever met qualified niceness as boring and unattractive, and in some extreme were irrationally negatively predisposed to it(calling it manipulative or creepy). Most women I have ever met were highly critical of men who were in any way "average", or who weren't fina…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:52 PM
7

This is comedy gold and again a perfect demonstration on how hypocritical and sexist feminist or, women who think like this, are. Have a plan? Do women have plans when they go on dates? Why would you expect a man to have one if you don't have one? You want men to take charge? That's not very equal. You want to hold different standards for yourself and the person you're on a date with because you're a woman? That's not very equal. You think spending "3 hours getting ready"(something no guy ever a…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:38 PM
9

Buffy, angel, firefly and even dollhouse were all amazing shows.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:26 PM
3

I don't know about anyone actually showing up to it, I was just talking about what kind of message that showing sent to men in that area.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 02:53 PM
13

I don't understand how anyone could defend Alamo Drafthouse. Like, if you were just a guy living in that area and you wanted to go see wonder woman, and the theater was like "nah man, fuck you, this movie is not for you. You're not welcomed here", that would be a really shitty position/message to have. More people who were involved with Wonder Women should renounce what Alamo Drafthouse did with their movie. They took a cool movie, which was the work of countless men and women, and made it a too…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 01:04 PM
4

It's funny because you can tell in this video that these women are taking these numbers personally(or those actresses were told to act as if they took those numbers personally), instead of just looking at the data objectively. They are inadvertently demonstrating a unanimous predisposition for being hysterical/neurotic from women, especially since they went pretty much out of their way to have these quotes read out of context from women who were already against it(there are certainly women who a…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:45 PM
1

I mean, if they just wanted to show how biased and ignorant those women can sound when sneering and reading something they don't like to hear, I guess mission accomplished? Doesn't really show anything about the document. It just tries to tell women that they should disagree with it because of groupthink or some misguided sense of female solidarity.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:42 PM
6

His ex-wife seems like a feminist extremist nutjob, using in infidelity as sacrilege against the ideology of feminism. It explains a little bit more about Joss both in what type of person would be attracted to such an extremist in the first place and what type of influence he had in his life. Cheating on her was certainly a shitty thing to do but to make it about a failure in feminism rather a failure in commitment is really fucking weird. "He is not a real feminist because he cheated on a woman…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:32 PM
13

"when I play basketball, every shot I miss has the pressure of a 100 failures because I'm a woman but the guys miss all the time and don't care". Pretty sure that line is complete bullshit and a clear sign that she's kind of an unreliable perspective. I guarantee you those guys took their failures to heart(that's how they get better) and felt the same pressure to do well(even if they didn't show it, if not simply to not put additional pressure on her). If a guy was to show emotion for every shot…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:16 PM
10

Every "feminist" on reddit you have talked to is likely prejudiced and biased against men, and completely ignorant or deluded over what the men's rights movement. They probably see the concept of equality as starting and ending with women, and everyone that says anything to the contrary as the enemy. They are following the feminist status-quo, and perpetuating the slander train.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:13 PM
11

The men's rights movement has never been about hurting or repressing women, but that has never stopped anyone from trying to portray the movement as such anyway.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:16 PM
1

The dehumanization aspect of it is something you are projecting onto the term. Male and female can literally be used for all sexually dimorphic species, which humans are. There is nothing dehumanizing about that. Also, when it comes to male disposability, it's men or male makes no difference. A headline could read "oh look a car crash, it's only only a few men died". It wouldn't be any different to the term male.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:12 PM
9

Wouldn't want to risk dating less educated, less successful or lower income men, the way men have been doing with women since the start of human civilization. Better freeze those eggs so you can start a family when you're in your 50's! Best logic ever!
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:38 PM
15

Insecure feminists desperately looking for things to get offended about go ape shit over the term female.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:01 PM
3

I mean, it's not really surprising either. Men's situations in their personal lives can be extremely dire given established cultural trends, and the trauma they face at home can be just as bad as the traumas they face abroad. Men might resort to the military when they are desperate and the military has kind of always relied on men's desperation to bolster their numbers. I have heard this as a common response to male suicide: "if you're really that desperate to die, just join the military and die…
/r/MensRights18/08/17 03:23 PM
46

It's almost as if you alienate, demonize and disenfranchise men, they don't feel welcomed anymore, and if you take away every method and incentive for them to succeed, they stop trying.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 01:27 PM
22

Males and men are mostly interchangeable terms. Men are adult male humans. "Males" in the context of discussing people/society assumes adult humans. It's really not something worth taking offence to.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 01:25 PM
5

1/3 vs 1/7... that is actually a very significant difference. This most definitely further proof/evidence of hypergamy and that very significant portion of women objectify men as money/success/status objects.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:02 PM
5

Maybe this idea of skepticism stems not only from basic ethical principles and common decency but, also, from the countless men who have experienced false accusations and slander from women. Most people's default position is to just accept/favour women's word on the basis of her gender alone, until they are exposed to the harsh reality of false accusations, or how women can and do exploit that default position to gain favour, power and value; or punish, discard and hurt men who have displeased t…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:26 PM
2

Correction: Trying to combat imaginary inequality with legitimate inequality.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:23 PM
7

It's almost as if hypergamy was still a thing, even among successful/stable/rich women(who typically do not see their own wealth as something to share but, rather, as a justification for higher "standards" and entitlements in men).
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:10 PM
2

Any place that aims to prioritize gender over sustenance is going to have that issue. It is inherently exclusive and alienating to men, and attracts women who are inherently misandric or sexist(anti-male, pro-female). These things are built on the premise that gender makes right, and builds itself on one massive ad-hominem(if a guy says it, it's unimportant and should be ignored; if a girl says it, it needs to be listened to).
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:53 PM
2

You can't really stop mc donalds from having a sign on a property they own. You can stop people from panhandling on public streets/side-walks though. And, yeah, you can argue that it's the driver's fault for being distracted and, legally speaking, the driver would still be liable but, that doesn't change that laws like these would still reduce the number of slow downs and accidents.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:51 PM
5

It shouldn't come to a protest but sometimes a protest is the last thing you can do and protests are effective only because they force the issue that you care about in front of people's faces. It's different when there are motorized vehicles involved. Most people don't like to be inconvenienced by people with signs while they are just trying to get about their day(especially if those people are being aggressive about it) but those distractions can, at the very least, slow/impede traffic and, at …
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:32 PM
5

They are asking them to move because they are doing it on a busy intersection, very close to the street. There are panhandling laws that prevent people from interrupting traffic or going around busy intersections to capitalize on heavy traffic and distracting drivers by approaching the vehicles with signs. It looks like the police came not because they were protesting but because they were doing it at a busy intersection. I support the intactivists and all their doing but, really, I can also com…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:48 PM
10

If I had a girl tell me "wow you fix your own computer? You're so smart! That's impressive", I would feel pretty great about myself. The typical response from women would just be "I don't care", "you're a nerd/loser/dork" or no comment at all. Genuine appreciation or even just positive reinforcement would be far more empowering than the typical indifference, belittlement or ridicule that would would typically show men for fixing a computer. If a girl came on to me by telling me "you look way too…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:29 PM
4

Oh look another feminists trying to demonstrate how hateful and oppressive men are by reversing the roles, only to reveal something that men would love and embrace because they do not have this massive negative bias against men or male attention.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:23 PM
1

They are literally demonstrating to the world how women do not prioritize money/success as much as men do. They are working for one of the top, if not the top, tech company in North America and they are just blowing it off like it's not a big deal, over an argument they didn't like(Even after the company took their side). Do they not understand how many developers in the US and Canada compete or dream about working in a company like Google? I guarantee you, most of those people wouldn't be blowi…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:39 PM
1

What the fuck is with that title? No one argued that women were biologically inferior. You are throwing your own sexist slant on the article.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:14 PM
3

Funny thing is, if you don't do any of the things in the benevolent sexism column, you will get called a women hater all the same. If you don't pay the bill on a first date? You must hate women. You don't call women love/dear? You must hate women. You don't make sacrifices for women? You must hate women. You don't treat women as though they were special/higher-value? You must hate women. The other funny thing is that a lot of the stuff under hostile sexism against women is essentially underhande…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:01 PM
5

I think a bigger factor here too, as to why men might have preferred or embraced virgins historically, is that it might also appeal to men's mentoring and altruistic nature. Men seem to get a fair deal of fulfilment and happiness from teaching others what they know, and that resonates to sexuality too. Men have also historically been expected to always take the lead, both in and out of relationships(both because it's easier to blame a man when things don't go well, and because it protects women …
/r/MensRights07/08/17 05:14 PM
166

Right. "I'm just waiting for my girlfriend" wouldn't really fly for a guy waiting inside a women's only section of a gym either. Funny how that kind of treatment is fine one way but not the other.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 03:15 PM
13

It's used as a shaming tactic against men in general, with male virgins being viewed as unattractive because they are virgins. Men are expected to lead and be experienced in romance/sex, as that demonstrates power and peer approval of other women; therefore attractive. Men who are virgins do not have prior experience, therefore demonstrate no power or peer approval from other women and therefore are deemed unattractive. Women do not want to lead or teach, nor are they very forgiving of men who l…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:59 PM
1

So basically, it's wrong to force the same responsibilities onto women that we have been forcing on men for decades?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 05:05 PM
2

Men have this unspoken pact to not kick each other in the balls because that is crossing a line that simply shouldn't be crossed in most cases. It is sexual assault. It's the worst form of pain a man can experience. It takes the sport and the decency out of any "physical conflict" between two men. It escalates things from a friendly bout to an unfriendly one, or from a restrained fight to a situation of survival. It risks causing permanent and non-recoverable damage to another man that no man wi…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:44 PM
1

Top comment basically says "women aren't paid less for same job but jobs dominated by women are valued less", as if there was some conspiracy against women to devalue the jobs they pursue.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 04:12 PM
4

Oh good, glad some form of government finally found somewhere to draw the line.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:25 PM
0

Why would women take strong positions when they can get men to take those strong positions for them. Same benefits, none of the risks. This dynamic isn't really something new. Men are raised by women. Most men are driven by, if not desperate for, female approval. It's very easy for women to say something like "I'm not a feminist but I won't fuck you if you don't think like a feminist", even when they don't mean it.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 01:25 PM
3

Good video and I completely agree that women are completely responsible for the type of men they choose to sleep with, what conditions/agreements were made beforehand or what contraceptive measures she wanted to take beforehand, but I disagree with one point she made at the end about "women must take care of the child", which conceptually and historically isn't really true. Women have other post-coitus options, mainly abortion and adoption. When they refuse those other options they are making a …
/r/MensRights01/08/17 04:38 PM
1

Pretty ridiculous response to someone approaching you with a lewd comment, for any man or woman.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 06:42 PM
1

It's both, really. I think a lot of people over state the balls argument because "durr, I have the manliest of balls and they need room because they are so massive!" or "durr, my boyfriend has the manliest of balls and they need room because they are so massive!". But, really, it's not even about size. Testicles are just extremely sensitive to temperature. They are constantly shifting up and down to regulate temperature. Confining them will make it uncomfortable because not only are you adding a…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:56 PM
8

This doesn't really sound like a "red pill". He just sounds like your typical ignorant and insecure bully/asshole. That type of guy would be the type of guy that would justify violence to make arguments or defend women. This type of man is a product of traditional conditioning and social reinforcement(specifically from women or for women's benefit). His response though was pretty typical of a guy who respond very irrationally and violently when confronted with the reality that they have been har…
/r/MensRights24/07/17 01:38 PM
5

I don't understand this line of reasoning. Like, even if this was even remotely true, and all violence against men was exclusively caused by other men(it's not) or that it's rare(it's not), why would that even be an argument? Imagine if it was the other way around and "the only violence women face is caused by other women", would any feminist consider this any less of an issue? Would they be spending every penny they have available towards figuring out why or how? Or to get men to get involved t…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 04:20 PM
2

This is kind of a sad story. Here you basically have the story of a man who was raised to hate himself for being a man, to the point where he became convinced that he didn't want to be a man(or was never a man to begin with). This is a man who was emotionally and psychologically damaged, to the point of self-mutilation, and people just encouraged him in his mental illness because it's the PC thing to do. Doctors, obviously, just profited from his condition along the way. Somehow, this man was ac…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:20 PM
2

This is no surprise to anyone with half a brain, who isn't living in a delusional bubble about the world. For men, harassment is practically a way of life. It's something that boys have to learn to cope with from a very young age, because assault, abuse, harassment and bereavement will come at them every day from everyone and in every capacity. It's something men just have to learn to deal with, because that's what everyone expects men to do. It's why men tend to under-report most forms of haras…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:56 PM
1

When guys point out something like "it's not really fair that heterosexual men are judged systematically or exclusively on their height by women", the response is "shut up you entitled misogynist, women are allowed to have their preferences without judgement" or "cry harder short guy! have fun jerking off in the friend zone!". Apparently, systematic prejudice and belittlement on something that superficial is entirely legitimate. Heterosexual men not wanting to get involved with another men suffe…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:45 PM
3

I would say there's a pretty significant portion of men in STEM who aren't interested in hookups but rather relationships, if not simply because women are so scarce for them that the idea of hookups is entirely unfeasible or because an emotional connection is a fundamental need that is commonly denied to them because they are male and nerdy. Hookups also tend to favour experience and male-assertiveness/confidence(if you're not experienced, assertive or confident, then you don't know how to deal …
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:38 PM
1

Technically, they don't cut the dicks off. They remove the other parts and invert the shaft.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:27 PM
32

That's because, as we all know, women were too busy being the primary victims of war back at home.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:22 PM
6

Hopefully not career suicide. She will always have my admiration, respect and support, and I'm sure a lot of other people feel that way.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 02:18 PM
1

but are more used as a tactic to try and hush feminists and women's rights activists. Hush "feminists", yes. Hush women's rights activism? No. How? Have you considered the possibility that a lot of what feminism is not women's rights activism but organized misandry and needs to be debunked and addressed head on? One, prison rape is vastly different than rape out in the streets. Rape is rape. He includes these to prove a point. Even if you were to exclude these, however, have you ever considered …
/r/MensRights18/07/17 01:35 PM
3

"I was going to invest money in your country but crimes committed by women have been reported, so I won't be spending money in your country until your women learn to behave themselves".
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:59 PM
4

I considered myself an egalitarian and a "feminism is about equality" person until I realized that feminism wasn't about equality, and that the vast majority of women were, if anything quite hostile to men in general, and that, like most issues affecting men, this was never addressed within feminism or by feminists. I stopped being a feminist when I realized that every issue, even the ones that affected men worse or far more negatively, were being framed in "how does it affect women" manner, whi…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:39 PM
1

It looks like she was really trying to imitate pewdiepie with the editing and the way she says "waman". Decent video though.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:19 PM
2

Any man who would see himself as any of these things would be instantly labelled a chauvinist and a narcissist, or even a misogynist for putting women ahead of themselves in some extremes. It would be viewed extremely negatively.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 01:31 PM
7

Young men are choosing freedom over work, and using that freedom to play video games. There's a difference.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 01:17 PM
62

Dude, we have gender segregated gyms because women have lost their collective shits at the notion that men might even look in their direction. Men are labelled pigs, pervs or creeps for even looking at women, and can be accused of harassment or even sexual assault for even trying to approach women. Men who try to get women's attention on the street are labelled "cat-callers" and treated as the worse scum of the earth(it's totally fine when women do it though). Universities are championing "safe …
/r/MensRights14/07/17 01:31 PM
22

Don't you see! Women would never judge, ridicule and delegitimize men for crying if it wasn't for their patriarchal oppression forcing them to! Those poor women. They are the real victims here.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 02:06 PM
10

How the fuck do you expect me to sit through the lion king and not cry when Symba finds his dead dad!? What kind of monster is this person?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:28 PM
3

Basically "Why can't men understand me when I'm a narcissistic, entitled, delusional, paranoid and misandric child who's afraid of literally everything, even the stuff that men are statistically greater victims of but that doesn't count because they are men, even though I don't really want to wear bags for my phone/keys and I don't really learn to defend myself or dress in a way that would make fighting or running possible! " Ps. men can be charged for peeing in public(even when they are totally…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 07:00 PM
4

It's also no great secret that the majority of men's genuine grievances with their place in the world would disappear if they got on board with feminism. This would be like saying: "It's also no great secret that the majority of jew's genuine grievances with their place in the world would disappear if they got on board with Nazism". It's like telling men that their best route to happiness is to embrace their disenfranchisement. What a disturbing and so thoroughly out-of-touch statement to make. …
/r/MensRights11/07/17 03:18 PM
5

Because male heterosexual worth and value is based on how much they are perceived to have. It's circular logic and it's mob mentality. Someone can only be attractive if he's already considered attractive. Sex toys for men essentially imply that men who use them must be using them because they don't have other options readily available to them, which implies a lower sexual worth and, therefore, a low worth as a person as well because he is a man.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:05 PM
1

"women shouldn't be allowed to work because it's giving a lot of jobs to women, at the expense of men" - Feminist logic.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:31 PM
3

"Real men don't get insecure, sad or depressed", didn't you know?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:23 PM
2

I don't even see how calling us insecure, sad and depressed somehow counts as an argument. If you repeatedly treat men unfairly or poorly, they will become insecure, sad and depressed. That is literally a human response to disenfranchisement. That being said, the hit piece is absolutely disgusting and full of misinformation and bigotry against men and the men's rights movement. You really shouldn't be posting it directly as that gives them ad revenue.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:18 PM
10

It is incredibly disturbing that they will not just take his records as proof but, rather, his spouse's word and only her word. I could not imagine anyone would ever be okay with this if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 01:14 PM
8

That's you. Most men care about the social aspects of it. A lot. It affects them every day and in ways which are just as destructive to them as any legal threat(which would seem, to them, as a very slim or inconsequential risk compared to social issues that already effect them every day). You can see tangible results of this everywhere. You see it in suicide rates, crime rates, in the number of men who die on the job, in the number of men who are failing in school or just giving up.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:43 PM
12

It's not just issues with the legal system, it's issue with society as a whole and how men are treated in any social or romantic settings, long before law ever becomes part of the equation. And, when the law is involved, it's not just about child custody or insane entitlements for women, but threats of false accusations, domestic abuse and reproductive rights as well.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 07:26 PM
15

The idea that men would choose depression or desolation is so incredibly insulting. Men cannot choose how they are treated or discriminated against for being men. Men cannot choose what options are available to them when they are dictated by circumstances and conditions entirely out of their control. Men cannot choose the circumstances that drive them to "give up", or the despair that leads to poor performance, suicide or homelessness. Men don't have the social support and safety nets that women…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:32 PM
2

Just skimmed through it. Pretty sure all of her type of mistakes and presumptions have already been addressed by countless other youtubers and redditors(myself included).
/r/MensRights05/07/17 02:36 PM
17

Even if it's true, could you imagine this story the other way around? I'm a man and I've had women grab my ass in bars before. Could you imagine any world where it would be okay or justifiable for me to respond by violently assaulting her, dragging her out with a chokehold, calling the cops on her, having her arrested, taking a picture of her as she's crying in shock and then posting it on the internet for everyone to share in my "great victory" over this woman who grabbed my ass, and then incit…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 01:12 PM
1

A lot of men's rights issues bleed into mgtow. What social, romantic and sexual opportunities are available to men compared to women, or how men are treated, valued and interpreted in these topics, are very tightly linked to a lot of social inequalities between men and women.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:51 PM
1

Feminists will always find ways to label men's rights activists as women-haters. The fact that they are doing this right now with pua communities and mgtow, which do not hate women, kind of demonstrates just that. It's just the easiest targets for them to exploit or slander.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:50 PM
2

I mean, for all the people trying to make handmaid's tale out to be the ultimate feminist show, there is also some stereotyping against feminism and it does expose some of the extremist misconceptions/predispositions that feminists have about the world. It's probably not intended but the show also demonstrates a shit load of typical/casual misandry both from the new government and from the women/handmaids as well(before and after the war). Even as the show pretty much exclusively focuses on how …
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:20 PM
-10

If that 10% doesn't even come close to narrowing that gap, then it's not a noticeable difference.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 03:02 PM
4

I don't think it's "excluded", it think it's simply not a big enough piece of the pie to really make a noticeable difference. Biology is also a requirement for nursing, which is heavily female dominated, so obviously you are going to find a lot of women in biology courses. That doesn't really mean that they are pursuing biology by itself purely as a science, however.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:24 PM
2

The point still applies even if that second field isn't gender studies. Gender studies is just the most ironic field they could have gone with but there are still plenty of other female dominated fields filled with women who complain about the same things even though they had the choice to go into male dominated fields themselves(if not simply because they are sexist enough to entirely avoid fields they wrongfully associate with men).
/r/MensRights04/07/17 02:22 PM
2

The only people who would refuse to hire a woman for being too attractive are insecure superficial women who feel threatened by younger and prettier woman in the office, because they are afraid of the possibility that this could take away a fraction of the free attention and special treatment she benefits from by being a woman.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:10 PM
2

There are differences between someone who uses the label of "feminist" and someone who uses the term "women's rights activist" though.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:38 PM
2

She addresses the point of any feminists that uses the word feminism in this video. In this case, the lumping is entirely justified. If they didn't use the term of feminist, then this wouldn't apply to them.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:19 PM
1

Most guys don't find nerdy girls unattractive because they are nerdy. They generally appreciate and respect those skills when they have it, or just think it's awesome. Even if they aren't the most popular girl around(though they certainly can be), guys will still happily embrace, date and have sex with those nerdy girl. At the very least, they would be protected from a lot of the verbal and physical abuse(in some extremes, physical/sexual assault) that nerdy men/boys experience growing up for be…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:31 PM
1

It's not like they were just victims either, they were harassing the guy as much as he was "harassing" him. I don't know if it's considered harassment if it's coming from both sides. At that point it's just a public argument.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 01:21 PM
1

You can get just as good coffee virtually everywhere else...
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:07 PM
1

Also, do they want people to ignore the fact that "beautiful but dumb" women do exist or do they just want us to treat those women as lesser people for it instead? I don't see how that's very "pro-women" either way.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:23 PM
4

Women in STEM fields are more likely to have higher verbal and social skills than men in STEM fields, because women in STEM fields have typically not experienced the same level of isolation, social rejection and constant verbal, physical and emotional abuse/assault that "nerdy" men have typically faced in their lifetimes for being male and nerdy. Women in STEM fields have the benefit of being exempt from all that, because they are women(not only a "protected" class but a "desirable" class as wel…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:20 PM
3

The "girls take longer" is a really bad argument and also completely sexist. Some men are slow, some women are quick(it would be just as racist to say something like "white people take longer than black people, so white people should have whites-only washrooms to make up for it). Even this wasn't the case though, and men were universally faster than women in all cases(which still wouldn't really be by much), this would still not justify the sexism of "women can go anywhere but men cannot". If me…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 02:01 PM
3

that cafe is one step away from being designated as a female and minority "safe space", if it's not already considered so. I'm probably going to keep going there Dafuq?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:34 PM
6

You drop it, and move on with your life Men have been doing this all of their lives for most of human history, and the only thing that got them is the notion that men do not get harassed.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:33 PM
2

But... you'd be okay leaving your 12 year old daughter alone in a restroom with a female sex offender? or your 12 year old boy alone in a restroom with a male sex offender? Do you honestly think washrooms are just a "free rape/sex card" where people could just get away with doing whatever they want without anyone ever noticing? Do you think rapists and pedophiles care about what the sign on the door says? A rapist will rape wherever he/she wants, because he/she is a rapists. If a male pedophile …
/r/MensRights27/06/17 01:22 PM
3

Are you honestly going to tell me that you'd be ok with taking a big noisy shit next to a fellow student/co-worker you had the hots for? First of all, why the fuck are you taking a noisy shit if there are other people in the room at all? If you're that conscious about it, why would you be okay being this loud around anyone at all? Why not just hold it or slow it down? Do you honestly think that, if you were in a situation like this, and you were being that loud, gossip couldn't spread to that fe…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 08:34 PM
2

If co-ed bathrooms suddenly became the norm overnight, this would be a thing for about a month. After that, people would just get over it.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 08:23 PM
15

I have been on the receiving end of catcalling, from men and women(mostly women), and it never made me feel uncomfortable. Felling uncomfortable to a compliment, specifically when a men does it, is a learnt response. Thinking of it as "being reduced to your sexuality" is also a learned response. There is nothing belittling about someone seeing you in a sexual way. It does not reduce or diminish you in any way. Your sexuality is a part of who you are(it would be more diminishing for people to dim…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:50 PM
15

I cannot even imagine a world where any man would even attempt to contemplate that kind of response, even jokingly, because some women yelled something like "Hey sexy! Nice abs!" to him.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:23 PM
39

Billboards showing breasts are sexist and offensive because they sexualize women. Women shouldn't be sexualized or deemed offensive for showing their breasts out in public. Pick one, feminists, not both.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:41 PM
4

Nah, bathrooms should just stop giving a fuck about what's between your legs. Everyone pisses and shits.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:36 PM
2

Shyness is not an incurable genetically transmitted disease, it's just the lack of social competence. And you can absolutely learn that, it just takes a lot of work. It takes experience to develop that competence, girls demand competence to recognize men as valuable/desirable, or to recognize men as even men. Without value there is no experience. Without experience there is no value. It's circular reasoning that is exclusively dominant in women towards men(the same problem does not happen in any…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:48 PM
3

I hate the term "benevolent sexism". It's an oxymoron. If it's benevolent, it's not sexism. If it's sexist, it's not benevolent. "Benevolent sexism" towards women is literally just sexism against men, and the only reason why people use it is because the only way feminists can define things is by how they affect women(which is completely sexist). It's like saying "only white people are allowed to swim in this pool" and then calling that "benevolent racism against white people".
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:09 PM
4

The distinctions you are making here are not only completely false('nice guys' are typically just decent guys who are subjected of a lot of dumb projection, false assumptions and misguided vilification) but also completely trying to legitimize this typical radicalization of nice guys. And, for the record, feminists and man-haters aren't really making these types of distinctions. Every guy they don't like, and every guy that's an easy victim for them, is a "fake nice guy" as far as they are conce…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:54 PM
1

There is an entire sub-sect of feminism that seems entirely devoted to demonizing and slandering any man that has ever considered himself nice or valued himself for being nice, or men who have ever felt wronged or taken advantaged for being too nice. It's pretty boggling. Not only is it incredibly sexist but completely toxic as well. It's harmful to men who are already down or having a hard time and vilifying men through completely farfetched strawmens. Often, it is feminists trying to legitimiz…
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:43 PM
8

Peter-pan is a variation of "man-child", which is another gendered slur that feminists use exclusively on men.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:38 PM
5

He said the problems men face weren't being caused by women or feminism, but by ideas of toxic masculinity, and if MRAs were serious they should be focusing on that. I hate shit like this. It's literally the most offensive way to exempt women and feminists from any and all responsibility for any of their wrong doings. Women can never do anything wrong or predominantly contribute to any wrongdoing. It's white-knighting and sexism in failing to hold women accountable for their actions, and trying …
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:01 PM
7

"men are so afraid of being like women that they'll make neutral things masculine in order to reaffirm their masculinity." Men have a lot of valid reasons to be afraid. A man's experiences will reaffirm the notion that being viewed as less masculine is absolutely destructive and detrimental to their wellbeing. And it's not even just "if we're not masculine, women won't like, touch, love or respect us", which by itself is a pretty substantial problem and motivator for men(because sex/love is pret…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 02:29 PM
1

At first, sure. But women for the most part are willing to be proven wrong, if you give them something else they desire. Again, delusional optimism. This is really not the case. Talk to enough women about this and the unbudging group-think is undeniable. I have seen enough women flat out deny any chance to short men and write them off, because they were short, and no amount of smooth talking ever changed their minds. Your post sounds like you spend too much time on /r/short, and are just looking…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 07:53 PM
1

coordinated campaign of harassment, bullying, and violent threats against women developers and cultural critics Not only is this completely false(criticism is not harassment, bullying or violent threats) but completely loaded as well(insinuating that any criticism from gamergate was directed at women because they were women). I see that whole episode as a shameful and disgraceful embarrassment for my gender. This should tell you everything you need to know about the source of the article. This p…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:04 PM
10

How can you be glad about it, if you haven't lived with a foreskin. Kids can get used to anything and think nothing of it, because that is all they know. Your parents could have cut both your earlobes at birth and that would be the norm for you. You would be just as happy to have no earlobes because you wouldn't really know any better. Doesn't make it right, nor does it mean you aren't missing something.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:39 PM
5

What's worse too, about subs like bluepill, neckbeard or niceguys is that they are not only trying to ridicule men for failing to meet gendered expectations or for being men(two different form of sexism), but they are also trying really hard to ridicule, disenfranchise and delegitimize disadvantaged men from a position of systematic privilege(like, women who have never had to ask a guy out in their lives, making fun of guys for being virgins; women who have never been rejected, shamed or assault…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:03 PM
3

Pretty sure men built those shelters, men donated to those shelters and men supported those shelters. Even if that wasn't the case though, it really goes to show how sexist and deeply committed that person is to gender discrimination and identity politics if he thinks women shouldn't help men because they are not of the same gender. That's like saying "white people shouldn't build houses for black people, tell black people to build their own damn houses!".
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:50 PM
2

We are going to publicly incite, legitimize, monetize and glorify violence against men to support an anti-violence shelter for women and children!
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:43 PM
12

Kate McKinnon seems to be doing a very good job trying to type-cast herself as a man-hater. What's really weird though is that this movie seems to have been boycotted by some feminists too but for some completely disturbing reasons. Apparently, it's okay if four women kill a man but it's not okay for four women to kill a sex worker(obviously because the majority of sex workers are women, and therefore making this a women's issue). In any case, you can't just make a shit movie with a shit plot an…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:26 PM
1

Most of the time personality, trumps physicality. Not when it comes to height. And, really, that is wishful thinking, because women can be just as shallow as men if not more so when it comes to weight and beauty too. Height, for a disheartening amount of women(a strong majority) is a prerequisit. Personally doesn't matter to those women when it comes to men under a certain height. Not just because they immediately write off and delegitimize those men but those men say will be perceived and inter…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:22 PM
7

biology. Hypergamy. Blaming the height obsession from women, or hypergamy for that matter, purely on biology is pure speculation. If there is something that can be done about it, how would we know? We are literally not even trying to do something about it because society absolutely fails to call women up on this either way, specifically because of the idea that women cannot or should not be criticized for their ideals, choices and judgement because they are women. If is it part of biology, then …
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:42 PM
12

This common obsession with height from women will forever astound me. I just don't get how it could be so important and defining to them. At best, you have women being completely sexist and superficial. At worse, you have women infantilizing themselves in the context of the relationship(men must be the taller one because bigger means leader). Height does nothing for anyone, it doesn't affect any aspect of the relationship(least of all sex, when you are bare-feet and horizontal). It doesn't refle…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 06:40 PM
15

Feminism failing to recognize the issues properly and twisting men's issues as "toxic masculinity", rather than acknowledging feminism and gynocentrism as part of the problem, is why feminism fails at equality. Because to acknowledge men's issues, feminism needs to admit that women, as a collective and individuals, hold various forms of systematic power and privilege, and that women can not only hold varying positions of power over men but fully abuse those positions of power to systematically h…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 06:08 PM
1

The response would typically be something like this: MtF transgender winning against men in gender neutral events? "You go girl! See women are just as good as men are!". MtF transgender winning against women in women-only events? "What the fuck is this shit? Men shouldn't be allowed to compete!".
/r/MensRights16/06/17 02:59 PM
2

The best thing to do is speak up This does not work and, for men, can easily make things worse. and try to ignore toxic people You can't just ignore or avoid them when they are prevalent, or when they do a very good job at hiding and disguising their toxicity.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:18 PM
2

That's an aspect of bullying and violence in general that really bothers me. It is not uncommon for girls/women to encourage, incite, reward, solicit or even blackmail boys/men to bully or assault other men on their behalves. Not only do those girls get away with it but then the idea that only boys bully or that only men are violent(and, by extension, that girls/women are innocent) becomes more prevalent. And, worse, is if you tried to confront these women as a man, you would be seen as the aggr…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:15 PM
1

This is why feminism will never be about equality. Everything they see is about misogyny and how those issues can be framed under that premise.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:58 PM
2

No women is just going to outright admit that this is how they see men. Most wouldn't even be aware or think twice about it, because it is so deeply ingrained in how society thinks.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 05:55 PM
2

What are you talking about? Women are absolutely socialized to resent and fear male attraction. It's literally all over the place, in every aspect of society and media. They are taught that, when men look at their breasts, that is offensive, and those men are pigs. They are taught that it's okay to react to open interest with hostility and anger. They are taught that if a man even so much as touches them, they are perfectly justified in responding with any form of violence they deem appropriate.…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 05:25 PM
5

There are far too many examples of discrimination to list them all. From daily "women first" attitudes/expectations, to "you're not allowed/welcomed here because you're a man", to "looking for female applicants only", to "women don't have to pay", to "you're the man, so you have to make the moves", to "can't hold women accountable for anything cause bitches be crazy(basically, girls will be girls)", to girls getting away with blatant bullying(even as they publicly assaulted me physically, sexual…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:13 PM
3

I don't know what you're talking about. Clearly bullying is exclusively innate to men because they have penises. Women are not capable of bullying because they don't have penises.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:44 PM
2

Women are socialized into an irrational fear and hatred of men, therefore women-only gyms are justified!
/r/MensRights14/06/17 02:42 PM
1

Androphobe is also another word that should be employed more often.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 01:30 PM
3

I often see "patriarchy" defined as "men controlling women's reproduction", which is not only completely ridiculous but, if taken by its definition, would mean that sex robots would be the complete opposite of patriarchy. It means men are finding means of sexual gratification outside of women, and that women could therefore face less sexual pressure from men.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 01:19 PM
4

They think this will perpetuate certain stereotypes about women Machines are not people. People are not machines. Even if guys were into sex slave robots, that doesn't perpetuate any stereotypes with any actual women, because they are not robots.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 01:16 PM
1

Wow...just wow.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:55 PM
12

But... wonder woman says men are unnecessary.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:47 PM
1

It really doesn't work that way. It doesn't come from nothing. Peers, parents, popular culture, gender roles, etc. These are all factors that people are affected by from a very young age.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:37 PM
2

I think you have that the other way around. They didn't "tell themselves" they were pathetic, they experienced being viewed as pathetic for long enough that they've simply come to terms with it or embraced it. It's a defence mechanism. The belief that "if you believe in yourself, you won't be pathetic anymore!" is not always applicable and if all you get from the world is negative reinforcement from women, then it will change how you perceive yourself.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 08:22 PM
1

Wonder woman was definitely overrated though. I would give it a solid 7, but rotten tomatoes had it up to 95%. Spoilers: Some of the action scenes were really cool, a lot of other ones seemed really fake(CGI) or poorly thought-out. The beginning fight with that amazons was really dumb(supernatural warriors with vantage position lose out to a couple of boats' worth of ww1 soldiers, and they all jump off the cliff to fight them up close when they all have bows they can shoot from the top of the ri…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:48 PM
2

It was okay. I think 7/10 or 6.5/10 is a fair score but I also really disliked man of steel and BvS. It definitely didn't deserve the 9.5/10 scores it is getting on rotten tomatoes.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:35 PM
4

TwoXC is built to enable sexism from women. It is built to attract misandric redditors, and there are a lot of misandric redditors. It doesn't represent all women. Just ignore it or call it out like it is.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 04:13 PM
6

although hookers do exist... Hookers can also be illegal, depending on where you live, or very sketchy/dangerous. Not every incel might be able to afford hookers either(especially not on a regular basis). Hookers are also not a permanent solution, nor do they provide any real emotional/romantic sustenance either(if anything, sexually relying on hookers can be pretty devastating to a man's self-esteem, especially if he's an incel). You can pay someone to have sex with you for an hour but that sti…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:57 PM
6

Right... because there couldn't be any possible problems with society that would disadvantage men in any way. Nope. They are clearly ALL delusional men who are at fault in all things and we shouldn't take any of their issues or stuggles seriously because they are virgins.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:51 PM
2

if you don't want to always have to pay for dates or always be expected to be stoic and fearless, then what you're advocating for is female empowerment Not only is it women who expect all these things from men the most but they do so out of privilege and entitlement towards men. It is how they choose to treat men. Most men would be happen for women to not judge them this way but that is not what women want. Women are empowered already and either do not want to be(because that means more stress, …
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:37 PM
1

Feminists are so intrenched into their perception of the world and female oppression that this is literally the only way they can define anything going on in the world(which, in turn, justifies their "need" for feminism). They literally cannot see misandry because all they see is different variations of misogyny. This is specifically why feminism is not, and has never been, about equality.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 04:24 PM
2

I hate hearing women cry oppression and sexism over "when men sleep around, they are called studs; when women sleep around, they are called sluts". Not just because there are clearly far bigger issues in the world of gender politics going on but because this is literally women crying oppression over their own privilege. This isn't some massive conspiracy against women, it is literally a double-standard because women are so incredibly advantaged. When men get laid, they are the under-dogs. They h…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 02:08 PM
1

If you're dumb enough to think that a razor that’s pink will be better at shaving your underarms or legs than a blue one, then you deserve to pay more Are there blue razors? I think most razors that aren't "just for women" are basically just grey or without any real discerning color.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:24 PM
1

It's not absurd to building women only shelters. First of all, there are far fewer homeless women than there are homeless men. Secondly, I guarantee you there are women out there who play the system and falsely report being abused for additional sympathy, shelter and provision. Thirdly, men under-report sexual assault because they wouldn't report it when it happens to them, and because no one would realistically care about homeless men. Even ignoring all that, gendered shelters still do not sens…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 04:29 PM
3

Her first example is something that was targeted because it was viewed as discriminative to women. It was to protect and benefit women first, not to be fair to men. It's really shady to claim that feminism advocates for men, when whatever "benefit" were gained for men were completely secondary or unintended. All of her other examples were basically products of the men's rights movement, most of which met feminist opposition every step of the way. Is she seriously trying to credit feminism for th…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 02:42 PM
13

In what world is wonder woman a chick-flick? Most women don't even care about comic book movies, and the comic book demographic is overwhelmingly male. There are countless female superheroes throughout the entire sci-fi genre, and men are supporting those characters.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 02:35 PM
2

Men make more money than women No, men work harder and longer hours than women, and do not have any other option but devoting their lives to their careers because that is the only way society values men and because, without that devotion, those men would have no chance with women at all. They strive to make more money than women, because society expects them to pay for a woman's way. Rarely have have to sacrifice their careers to raising their families For men, any sacrifice to their career also…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 02:04 PM
23

"Women hold nearly two-thirds of america's student loan debt" On paper, yes. In practice? No. A heterosexual woman who brings her debt into a relationship will undoubtedly have that debt consolidated sooner or later, and whether the relationship lasts or not. Not only are women so advantaged in this perspective that they are essentially guaranteed to find partners no matter how much debt they have, they can also be explicitly/openly selective on the basis of income and how receptive/willing a ma…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:33 PM
1

"Women in film awards" isn't really equal now is it? It is literally giving women awards because they are women. Imagine any other type of film aways that would exclude people based on their gender or skin color: "Men's film awards", "White people's film awards", etc.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 07:24 PM
13

Honestly as men we have to demand respect, not take crap, 9 times out of 10 women will respect you for it This isn't something that men should have to take by force. Basic human decency or empathy should be the default. Teach women to appreciate, respect or even just empower men in their lives, rather than teaching men what they need to do to earn the respect of sociopaths.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:42 PM
12

It drives me nuts when, given all the different options and protection we offer women for any form of abuse, we still offer so little for men when it comes to emotional, social or physical abuse from women. All of it is just excused because "girls will be girls", where women are just considered this untouchable upper class by everyone that men just has to learn to deal with or be labelled a women-hater. They can lie, slander, insult, belittle, humiliate and denigrate, and people make excuses for…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:38 PM
3

In their twisted logic, "ladies first" is not discrimination, it's both the status quo and empowerment(which kind of makes it an oxymoron).
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:19 PM
5

What they don't show you is the male feminist baby, who was shamed from birth for having a penis, who was told to be weak, who was told that he's dumb, who was told to be quiet and who was emotionally damaged/crippled for life.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:16 PM
11

haha! Because fat and ugly men don't deserve rights guys, everyone knows they aren't even real human beings! It's hilarious how, even in their attempt to silence/belittle MRA's through fallacies, slander and adhominems, they still come through as being kind of immature bigots with things like this. Somehow, imagining MRA's as being fat and ugly makes it okay for them to ignore what MRA's argue or what they experience. Falsely projecting this notion of MRA's as fat and ugly men is how they appare…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 02:13 PM
17

Most women expect men to take charge and will not only still pedestalize men who take charge(in all aspects of life) but also deligitamize men who don't(often an certain extreme levels of dehumanization). It's also very likely, by extension, that they would also see female bosses negatively because they, themselves, do not want or like to take charge(because it's hard and when things go wrong, that's who people blame, and they feel like being women entitles them to never having to take charge), …
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:17 PM
3

the more I saw how rare it was, even for “good” men or “conscious” men to show this kind of concern over a woman’s experience. Bullshit. "Good" men or "conscious" men are not rare and they most certainly demonstrate concern and empathy with the women they are with. They often require, if not crave, that type of connection or intimacy with the women they pursue. Not only that but when men do have difficulties with this, it is generally due to how common it is for women to react negatively to such…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:35 PM
7

Let's be real here. Feminists don't give two shits about explicit verbal consent because even when a woman gives her explicit verbal consent before and during intercourse, a man could still be charged of raping her because she changed her mind during the act but didn't tell him, because she changed her mind after the fact or because "all sex is rape under patriarchy". They could literally demand explicit verbal consent and then, the next day, throw all of that away with statements like "she said…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:08 PM
3

"Women put men into power to do some thing, men do things on their behalf, said things are not popular, women claim themselves unaccountable and throw those men under the bus for doing those things, men get blamed/punished, women are not blamed and repeat the entire process with different men" isn't really something that's new though. There's this false notion that women have no power or never had any power, even as they act by proxy through men in a way that allows them to avoid any responsibil…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:09 PM
1

People in this thread have explained very eloquently why the OP's behavior could very easily be perceived as creepy. Those feelings can absolutely be, as they often are, driven by personal delusions, prejudices and biases. If someone said "i feel uncomfortable around black people" or "I feel uncomfortable around jews", saying something like "you can't decide how other people should feel" as a way to justify their racism or antisemitism, they would be in the wrong. But you're trying to argue that…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:13 PM
1

it's a big difference between charging more for insurance and violating civil rights. Not when the pertinent point is gender discrimination, which is identical in both situations.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:53 PM
1

What feminism does in the name of gender equality is not gender equality.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:52 PM
26

This picture is a perfect representation of the feminist agenda. While this would certainly be something feminism would do in the name of gender equality, it most certainly does not represent gender equality.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:45 PM
45

I think they are missing the point of a "gender non-specific" washroom. A gender neutral washroom would just mean that everyone is welcomed, not that they can't use urinals because it's impractical for women. You can still have gender neutral washroom with urinals, because even though only men use them, there are still stalls there that are available(which would otherwise be occupied by men who have to pee). This is literally just trying to inconvenience or alienate men because they use urinals.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 06:42 PM
5

You can make probabilities by lumping people together for anything. You could literally do a survey and see that people who are 6 feet tall or above have more accidents, or people with acne, or people who eat avocados. Doesn't mean it's right to use these types of things to justify charging people more money, or that it isn't sexism when that is done on the basis of gender. Your argument could literally be used to justify any kind of discrimination. Black men are statistically more likely to ste…
/r/MensRights17/05/17 05:36 PM
8

It is sexism though. It's lumping around all men together because they are men. There's a reason why they don't go "there's studies that show that black/asian/latino people are more expensive to insure, so were going to tax all black/asian/latino people more".
/r/MensRights17/05/17 01:52 PM
3

Do you honestly think shit like this restricts women in any way from finding suitable men willing to date, fuck or marry them? You are seriously underestimating just how much women can get away with or exactly how advantaged women are when it comes to friends, sex and romance. Not only will people tolerate this from her but will work around her to accommodate her prejudices. Men won't be withhold sex from her just because she says sexist shit, nor would they be in a position to shape her beliefs…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 08:46 PM
1

You say that as if most of us didn't start off as feminists, or literally knowing and empathizing with feminist ideology. We oppose them because we understand how inherently hateful and one-sided they are about any issue.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:47 PM
4

First, women getting sexual comments is not the same thing as hateful comments. A troll going "nice tits" to a woman is not hateful or bigoted. It's not dangerous or mean. There is literally nothing to take offense unless you choose to take offense to it. Men don't take them as seriously because they are used to far worse comments(i.e. actual threats, slander and actually damaging comments), far more negative comments(literally no one gives them compliments) or far more hurtful comments. They ar…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:37 PM
0

I don't think those values are reliable or even indicative of real life odds, especially when you consider how many women have escaped the label of serial killer by placing the blame onto a man or playing the victim. And, even if these numbers were 100% accurate. 1/10 of a 0.001% chance that someone might be a serial killer is just as much a risk as 9/10 of a 0.001% chance.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 01:22 PM
2

Nothing about this story indicates intent to harm. It's literally just a guy going into a store, finding a girl cute and then wanting to talk to her again. You are the one adding to the story and trying to make it sound way more malevolent that it is.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 01:17 PM
2

I do read the news, and that's how I know that women also not only commit crimes but also receive far more lenient sentences for them as well(which means they are back on the streets a whole lot faster than men for committing the same crimes).
/r/MensRights15/05/17 07:37 PM
1

There's a lot to respond to on this but it's a copy/paste so I'm not sure there's any real reason to if it's not responding to the original poster.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 05:40 PM
3

Probably, but that's not exactly the same, because the chances of her being a lesbian serial killer are kinda low. They are about the same as running into an heterosexual male serial killer, both are very low. Also, she doesn't have to be homosexual, as not every serial killings are sexually motivated.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 05:31 PM
2

Nobody's taking their chances by running your idiotic odds Clearly, they do, because the odds of danger would be the same running onto a man or a woman, and yet women would only consider those odds irrelevant when it comes to men. A woman is just as much a threat to others as a man is, and yet isn't treated as such. They have to know it, it's a basis for survival. Making assumptions despite the inability to properly assess threats may be survival but it doesn't mean that it's rooted in reality o…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:56 PM
1

This is why I hate when people think feminism is synonymous to equality. Feminism, from its very conception, was based on a paradigm that defines words like 'oppression' as something exclusively female, even when women are not oppressed or when men have it worse. It is because of feminism that concepts like "reverse oppression" exist or need to exist, because the concept of male oppression is so inherently foreign to their ideology, despite always being there throughout history.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:52 PM
3

If it was a woman that is bigger than her, no one would be jumping to the worse kind of conclusions they are making about him, because he's a man.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:43 PM
4

The reaction was pretty extreme and uncalled for, and it's unfortunate that this is how people react to shy/awkward men with any form of social anxiety, but it is the way it is. At the very least, it would have come off as being somewhat desperate and meek(which men are also judged more harshly for), because you essentially tried to force a third social interaction instead of just moving on with your life or just asking her out on the first try(which is also what society expects men, and only me…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:40 PM
7

OP even said that the cashier was 'cute' and reduced her worth for a date to her body What.the.fuck? Seeing that a girl is cute is by no means "objectifying" her. It's literally acknowledging her as an attractive human being, and then wanting to proceed further. She would likely accept depending on whether or not she finds him attractive as well. Even then, don't fucking stalk You're kind of taking a lot of the meaning out of the word stalk, if you're just going to stretch its definition to even…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:28 PM
2

If you're not willing to chat with her at work, near the cameras, then you're not really willing to try and get a date are you? Maybe he just doesn't want to put the girl on the spot in front of her coworkers/bosses, or make it seem like she's using company time to fraternize? Maybe having a crowd around would make him nervous, if he has social anxiety, or even more fearful of rejection because now there's an entire crowd to witness his failure and rejection if it doesn't go well? What does it h…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:19 PM
8

In many social situations, I can tell that some men are attracted to me. What scares me is that, if they ever decided to rip my clothes off and fuck me right then and there, I would be unable to stop them. That is the epitome of irrational fears though. A man that is attracted to you wants your approval, not a mindless-body. He wants you to want him back. The last thing on his mind is rape, unless in the 0.01% chance that he might be a rapist just walking around. And then, realistically, even if…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:16 PM
2

Lucky I'm white or this may have gone down differently. Nah, it would have gone down the same way. Most "racial profiling" is really just "gender profiling". A woman white, black or any other skin colour, waiting outside to talk to someone would not have sufficient cause to call the police.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:10 PM
1

Another really good example of why I can't stand people just think the best way to fix men's problems is to tell them "just talk about it", as if that was an effective way of solving these problem(not only does it not fix anything but instead dismisses their experiences and validates the problems in question) or as if it was a safe thing for men to do. It's neither. When men "talk about it", they are just deemed or dismissed a mentally unfit, a manchild(because only immature men could ever feel …
/r/MensRights12/05/17 02:41 PM
1

How do they feel about women who expect men to pay for dates? Because technically that's still men paying women for their time.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 06:36 PM
6

Given gender roles and all, the only difference would be that if you hire a woman, she gets to keep that money and spend it on herself. If you hire a man, that money goes to his wife or girlfriend so she can spend it on herself. But, yeah, women are the slaves.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:31 PM
16

"In these areas[porn] women are told what to do by threat of money" You mean a fucking job? Paying women amazing money to do something sexual is "threatening" them with good living? wtf? What if they used this amazing new platform to defy gender stereotypes, and rather than serving as a poor reflection on society, instead inspired us to look at ourselves in new ways? They would do this and feminists would still find a way to take offence to it. This blurb already demonstrates that people care mo…
/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:16 PM
2

I've never felt social stigma for masturbating. Yes, because you apparently live under a rock, being in denial or having selective memory couldn't be a factor here. Clearly you have everything figured out. Even when you have popular culture(music, movies, books, comics, television, radio, etc) completely reflecting all of these sentiments and they are completely observable on a cultural level, if a girl with a kink has asked you to jerk off in front of her once, the stigma doesn't exist. I have …
/r/MensRights10/05/17 07:53 PM
27

What I am here to say, on behalf of all the women in your lives, is that we don’t want your silence. Your silence, quite literally, is killing you. I hate when people say this kind of stuff, because it's a really shallow and dismissive approach to men's issues. It's not the silence that is killing us, it's the issues we face. It's the male disposability. It's the struggles of every day expectations and isolation. It's how we are treated as men, for being men. It's the life-time of systematic emo…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 07:36 PM
1

I feel like this woman should not be allowed to interact with children, let alone going to any school for student talks.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 06:12 PM
14

Use your hand like a real man It's still a common social sentiment that male masturbation is something only "lazy fuckboys/losers" do, and that "real men" don't masturbate because they always have a flock of women readily available to service them. There are a lot of heterosexual women who look down on male masturbation, or who would think less of a man simply by picturing him doing it. The attitude that people(mainly women) against male sex toys are that same sentiment taken to a further extrem…
/r/MensRights09/05/17 04:08 PM
1

I don't really agree or disagree but, even if these two aren't the same thing, the vast majority of people will treat it the same because it's still the word rape, especially when it involves women.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 02:51 PM
2

You made the mistake of thinking that feminism was ever about equality in the first place. It never was. It was always about prioritizing women over men, from the very beginning. Feminism has flourished the way it has specifically because no one cares about men and because people care about women's well-being and what women want far more than they do about men(it is inherent and ironic contradiction of feminism). Feminism grew as a movement because people have always given a shit about women, ev…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:47 PM
2

Because it's not nearly as important as you think it is if "women couldn't vote 100 years ago!" is the basis for every argument you throw. Not only did women grant themselves the right to vote without the right to vote, very quickly(which in of itself demonstrates that it's not as important as that think it is), but even before women voted, their interests, safety, provisions and demands were still being met(above men's in most cases). And, when voting was reserved to the "head of the household"…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:34 PM
2

Ah yes, an adhominem. Great argument! Also, not sure what being an atheist software engineer has anything to do with this, my comparison was meant to be interpreted as an analogy.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 08:27 PM
3

You sound like a fundamentalist christian telling someone "you don't know anything about the flood and jesus christ, you should head to your local practitioner to be re-educated in the ways of the bible". Gender studies classes are not something you should be endorsing, let alone as an argument or as a proof of credibility. If you paid for a gender studies degree in a community college, I feel sorry for you.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:31 PM
3

I suggest you inform yourself a bit more about the history of female suffrage and economics but, even ignoring setting aside the fallacies for a second, the advocacy of rights for women, exclusively, is not synonymous to gender equality. "Men's rights" is not synonymous to equality either, it's simply one aspect of gender equality. Also, not only did society grant women universal voting rights(a right which men in the US still technically do not possess, because they require to sign up for consc…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:25 PM
5

Do you somehow not understand that your perspective on american history is both wrong and completely skewed, that both genders were historically denied equal and human rights in the past and that, despite men having it worse in most ways, women's rights were the only ones deemed worth addressing? Or that even when women rights were entirely addressed, and men's rights completely ignored or, worse, further twisted into "women's issues" people still choose to focus on women exclusively? Do you not…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 05:11 PM
10

Do you honestly think that no women have ever worked, in all of human/american history, because of some story your grandma told you? Just because things are better now doesn't mean they are equal just yet. And yet, despite the countless issues that are literally killing men, somehow it's still women we consider oppressed and disadvantaged, and the ones we believe should be focused on the most.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:50 PM
4

fem·i·nism ˈfeməˌnizəm/ noun noun: feminism the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes. If you have to specify that it's "advocacy of women's rights" then it's not inherently about equality now is it? "Gender equality" would be advocacy for men and women's rights on the bases of equality of the sexes. If your definition of equality starts and ends with women, then it's not equal. Even the nicest and simplest definition you could pull up still does not define feminis…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:47 PM
2

But in practice, there are still women who are told that a customer would rather speak to a man, because they trust a man's opinion more. Even if this was even remotely true(which it isn't, not even close, I think most people would be fine with women in customer service, if not even prefer it or demand it, because they would prefer to interact with a woman than a man), this would not be an, in any way, a representation of female oppression of any kind(especially not when you consider, overall, t…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:41 PM
6

It has never once, in the entire history of feminism, stood for equality.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:29 PM
2

Feminism, or this notion that equality starts and ends with women, is literally the biggest obstacle to gender equality.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:28 PM
6

Honestly, most women are in support of equal rights. Most women do not support equal rights when it comes to issues that inconvenience them, or puts additional burdens/risks on them. Most people are motivated by self-interest first, and feminism is a perfect example for this. "Most women are in support of equal rights" is only true when equal rights are strictly defined as pushing women up(and pushing men down. That is a not a good, healthy or honest definition of "equal rights".
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:27 PM
3

No, they have not. What planet are you from?
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:24 PM
7

How do women not have equal rights? Legally speaking, women have all the rights men have and quite a few that men don't. Culturally, socially, romantically, sexually and even financially(or access to wealth), women are more privileged and advantaged than men(and this was also true in the past). We look back on the past think how messed up it was that women were told by their husbands they could or could not work Not only is that completely untrue, because there has been women working all through…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:24 PM
2

Feminism has never been about equal rights. It has always been about a skewed narrative, used to justify misandry, gynocentrism and special rights/privileges for women exclusively. It has never been about equality, nor would it be called feminism if it was.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:14 PM
2

Given the top upvoted comments(NAFALT), it looks like there's some significant brigading going on.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:11 PM
3

There is no application of feminism that makes sense. If it did make sense, then it wouldn't be called feminism.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:11 PM
4

Feminism is, fundamentally, built on the false premise of female oppression and subjugation, which in of itself relies on the complete dismissal of women's privileges and men's devotion to women. It is, at its core, about female supremacy, misandry and special rights, privileges and entitlements. That is what feminism is, and it has nothing to do with extremists within that movement(which are still, scarily enough, far more accepted and supported than MRA extremists would ever be).
/r/MensRights08/05/17 04:10 PM
14

No, ofcourse not. Men can't get lonely, even in the face of decades of forced desolation and celibacy. Only women get lonely, even when they are in relationships, or surrounded with men who love her, or constantly approached by men who really want to get to know them. Bars, dating sites and social events everywhere are filled with women who have more matches than they know what to do with them, with men getting little to nothing unless in comparison, but it's obviously women who are the lonely o…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 01:34 PM
3

"female independence" is that what they are calling systematic misandry now?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 01:29 PM
3

Because feminism is not about equality, nor has it ever been, and the implication that it does stand for equality is not only wrong but incredibly damaging to any real egalitarian pursuit or activism for men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 03:28 PM
10

I don't know why feminists would feel threatened by this given the way women treat men in dating. The sad, if not ironic, reality of this is that the only men who would seek to use any kind of sex robots in the future would be men that have no other options, because men love women more than anything and want connections with real women more than anything. No man would choose a pocket pussy over a real woman, but there are certainly plenty of women who would choose a dildo over real men. There ar…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 08:40 PM
10

That's another point that really bothers me a lot. People who whine about this on the other side of the argument saying "I wouldn't want women on my squad because they are weaker or couldn't carry me to safety". You can shoot a gun at any weight and there were certainly small/scrawny guys(some of which were kids) fighting wars at some point in time in history. They weren't all of equal height, weight and strength. That scrawny guy wouldn't have been able to pull his 250 lbs squadmate out of a da…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:48 PM
7

I hate that argument of "women don't start wars". Bullshit. Wars are fought for the benefits of women too. Every country that has ever been to war, did so with the support of their women. Did Germany's women stage a massive million women march against the subjugation/extermination of jewish people in Germany? Women can be just as violent as men can be, and this argument is basically women completely failing to hold themselves accountable for the violence that is done in their name or that they i…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 07:42 PM
1

I don't think the differences are biological but, rather, the options that are available to women and the pressures that are imposed on men to provide on a cultural/social level. As much as people in general might want to work, there are certainly a lot of people who do not enjoy working or who are limited to draining, straining, unrewarding or menial jobs. When women look at these jobs, they may simply ask themselves "why would I want to be doing this when I can just not work" or "why would I w…
/r/MensRights28/04/17 07:51 PM
3

It bothers me when people just throw out this notion that women are "twice as often" depressed than men, when there is clearly a huge bias in how these things are diagnosed. Not only is there a huge disparity in how much people care about men and women(people generally care far less about men, or their wellbeing, than they do about women's) but there is a major disparity in how we react to men's depression compared to women's(when a man is depressed, we ignore it or downplay it, or tell them to …
/r/MensRights28/04/17 01:33 PM
1

Yeah, ofcourse, men are just naturally born with this desire to kill babies. That is the only reason why people would make or use bombs. It has nothing to do with any kind of human desire to protect themselves, loved ones or their interests from threats(real or perceived).
/r/MensRights21/04/17 02:04 PM
5

The most disturbing thing about this to me is that it implies that you should automatically trust the word or the judgement of a single woman, who is likely inebriated(these things are posted in bars after-all), to condemn a man as a sexual predator or a violent criminal. We live in a world where the notion of "he's bigger than me" or "he's a man" are considered valid justification for women to feel "unsafe" and to legitimize completely irrational fears. These types of posters are also there to …
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:36 PM
4

I don't see how feminists could possibly ever think they are acting in the interest of equality when their entire premise driving them is so wrong to begin with. If every issue you see starts and ends with women, then not only are you not being true to men but you are also clearly demonstrating that you have a very skewed view on the world and human history.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:26 PM
2

My social studies teacher knows more about history and economics than those stupid history and economics teachers!
/r/MensRights13/04/17 08:21 PM
5

There are a lot of people who confuse suffrage for sufferance. It's kind of dumb and it demonstrates a certain level of ignorance but it's also kind of an easy mistake to make(especially when the interviewer goes out of his way to be as vague as possible, even when asked to define suffrage). The word suffrage itself isn't a very commonly used word. Their beliefs on female sufferance seemed very naive/sexist too though.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 03:32 PM
11

I didn't really like how he starts off diminishing female on male violence. Women hit men more often because they know they can get away with it and while, on average, are certainly bigger/stronger than women due to biology, it doesn't mean that women can't hurt men or that women cannot be abusing men who are smaller than them. It also doesn't take any real body strength to stab someone or to assault someone with any kind of weapon. If we were still living in huts and the hardest weapon readily …
/r/MensRights12/04/17 03:18 PM
1

Traditionalism isn't terrible in the sense that it has worked. This is an argument that could be used against any form of progress and for just about anything. It's an excuse that is commonly invoked by religious extremism. There is nothing good about following tradition for the sake of tradition. People need to always be trying to figure out what works and what doesn't. What makes sense and what doesn't. What is sensible/ethical and what isn't. Traditionalism is inherently anti-progress.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 03:16 PM
16

There's certainly a troubling portion of anti-feminism that is rooted in traditionalism, rather than legitimate care/concern for men and gender equality. Typically, this is women who want to embrace a "traditional" role of submissive whenever it's convenient to, because that's a luxury that is available to them. The ironic part is that this isn't even entirely anti-feminist, because most feminist movements would historically prioritize women over the issues and would legitimize/defend women's pr…
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:48 PM
2

You are offended by these messages because the idea of placating men offends you. They are offended by these messages because they are deliberately looking for things to be offended by and looking for reasons to resent men. There's a difference. There is nothing wrong with men giving these types of compliments and the way women might take advantage of this or delegitimize men for it is the problem(which you are attempting to legitimize), not the fact that they are giving women compliments.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:32 PM
1

Men are taught that critiquing anything about any woman is misogonistic. Women are taught that being as openly crude and judgemental towards men as possible is "empowerment" and "just their preference". When men body-shame women, everyone turns against them. When women body-shame men, everyone enables, supports and/or defends them.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 05:51 PM
29

Awesome.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 05:47 PM
1

Marvel pandering to extreme sjw politics is a major part of the problem but, the reality of it is, women also just don't buy comics that much either. People like to live in this delusion where women are 50% of the "gaming/comic/nerd community", but this is just not the case and has never been the case. Women are generally not into these things because they associate it with men/masculinity(and therefore not something they should be into) and because they associated it with nerdy/unmasculine men(…
/r/MensRights06/04/17 03:50 PM
2

Despite constant onslaught of evidence that demonstrate a systematic and cultural problem.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:57 PM
14

Can't help but laugh at the top comment. Assuming this story is even true, here you have a story of a guy who arguably put his well-being in danger(if those men were a threat to her, then they would have been an even greater threat to him, because physical assault is a thing in the real world), and this girl basically gives him props for "being identifiable"... because, you know, he's a man and also therefor a threat.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:54 PM
1

Pointing out toxic masculinity has helped to get rid of the pressure to conform to what society traditionally expected from men. A bit late but just saw this, and I really wanted to point out how wrong you are. Pressure to conform for men doesn't come from "toxic masculinity", because this would assume that it's just men reinforcing roles on other men, which really isn't the case. Pressure to conform is a social problem that is a problem that mainly starts and ends with women. Right in this thre…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 03:23 PM
2

While I do agree with you in concept, I think it's also naive to dismiss the reality that women are incredibly advantaged and privileged when it comes to finding partners and access to sex. Even the shyest, meekest and ugliest of women have access to sex, because there will always be men coming around to instigate it with them. They don't have to do anything for it, because that we live in a culture where men are expected to pursue and woo. Women "like to be lead" because it's easier to be lead(…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 03:07 PM
1

Most guys really do not care. This is typically a far more drastic problem for women when it comes to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 02:55 PM
1

This would probably be the last thing I judge a woman on. The non-virgin would be better at sex and probably not as clingy or jealous. These are really dumb assumptions. You have no way of knowing. A girl that has had multiple partners might be a very selfish partner(could be a complete starfish), and she could be clingy or jealous. Someone who is a virgin could turn out to be not clingy or jealous, and could certainly turn out to be a better partner. Not only that but, realistically, you are ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 02:53 PM
1

At least they allow men in to begin with. There are a lot of gyms that are built around the practice of refusing men service in order to appeal to sexist women.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:12 PM
3

The ironic part is that feminism has, historically, been one of the biggest obstacles to legitimizing prostitution(besides religious/conservative views on prostitution). It's feminism that claims female sex workers to be victims of men. It's feminism that claims that men are misogynists for paying women for sex, even when they have no other options. It's feminism that seeks to criminalize sex work or, more specifically, men who pay for sex. Most men would probably be happier if there were safer …
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:10 PM
4

Male miners are putting their bodies through a lot of toxic shit though. Sex workers have risks but the risks and toll on their bodies is much lower.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:02 PM
1

Arguably, sex workers risk their lives too. They are putting themselves in very isolated positions on a regular basis. That being said, you could pretty much say the same thing about anyone who works in 1 on 1 situation with anyone. The dangers of being a soldier, or even a boxer, are a lot higher though.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:01 PM
5

Any gym that still has a women-only section is in breach of the equality act.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:58 PM
4

Everything men do on this planet revolves around gaining the attention and approval of women. Every song ever written by men is about what men would do for women. Every dating site, every night club, every social group, every school and every business is entirely slated in women's favour. But, yeah, women aren't valued. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:56 PM
14

A male MRA would never get this kind of treatment. Male MRA's would be treated a lot worse than this. They would be labelled everything from neckbeard virgin loser, to misogynist, to rape-apologist. He would practically be committing social and sexual suicide, because women would very quickly use whatever means they can to hurt him. White knights would volunteer to physically assault him, if not simply to provide women a service.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:52 PM
101

It's almost as if people can look at facts and then make up their own minds, without having to source their personal views and opinions to other people.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:52 PM
2

That was a great write up. One thing I'd like to add though is that women's privileges and psychological abuse doesn't really just stop with kids. This is typically a bigger problem with younger couples but women generally do have a great deal of power and privilege when it comes to hurting or destoying a man socially, whether through slander or social manipulation. Not only are people more willing to defend women, but they are also more willing to take a woman's side in a conflict(girls especia…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:06 PM
3

The only real way to deal with this is to remove all gender segregation and all taboo from locker rooms. Kids would get over it pretty quickly if this was just the way it is for everyone. That is how they got used to undressing/changing around people of their own gender in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:44 PM
8

People seem to fail to understand how aesthetics are entirely subjective. When I see a circumcised dick, it doesn't look better to me. It looks scarred, dried out and stretched out. It looks unnatural, unhealthy and incomplete. The only reason why these people see these penises as being more aesthetically pleasing is because that's what they expect penises to look like, mainly because that's what their dicks look like or because it's the norm where they are form.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:39 PM
1

These are not "generalizations" but observations made over a life time of experience(both personal and external). These are also observations made about society as much as they are about women. Every woman I have ever met, with very few exceptions, adhered to these observations(not to mention public cases, hear-say and other external sources/statistics) because that how society shapes them. You are the one making a lot of dumb assumptions over my argument, along with a fuck ton of ad-hominems to…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:12 PM
15

Confidence is only a desirable and necessary survival trait because women choose to make it so. They don't have to do this, they just do because it makes their decisions easier, and because it allows them to succeed in life without being confident themselves. Women have all the power to date men with less confidence then them, now more than ever, they just choose not to. It's just how they choose to judge and value men as romantic and sexual partners, even in situations where a man's confidence …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:54 PM
70

I like how she resents men for having confidence in the workplace, even though men without confidence will literally get culled out of existence, both in and out of the work place. Women aren't exactly known to be "kind" towards men who lack confidence. Without that confidence, men end up in a very shitty and desolate position in life that women will never experience regardless of their experience. That is female privilege.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 05:23 PM
1

You can be a wise peace seeking and loving man and still be passive and weak. Aloy also literally does every for him because he seems to be completely oblivious or inept.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 08:33 PM
1

The sun king was depicted as a "hero" because he overthrew the previous sun king(another all vile/evil male patriarch) but is mostly passive and weak throughout the story. The matriarchs are all portrayed as wise, peace seeking and loving. Even the "mean one" is depicted as coming from a place of love and compassion for her people, and is eventually redeemed through her personal lord and saviour Aloy. Their only "flaw" is that they perceive technology as some kind of deity and, considering Gaia …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 07:45 PM
5

I played through the game and, while I actually loved a lot of things about it(the gameplay, the mythology, the visuals, the characters, etc), I most definitely made the same observations you did. They were quite obvious. Every male character in the game(except maybe for Aloy's father) falls in those three categories, and are all depicted in a very negative, villainous or emasculated way. Every female character in the game is depicted in a positive empathetic, wise or heroic/noble way. Aloy and …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:58 PM
1

You are making a lot of really bad logical jumps here, and a lot of dumb assumptions. Being fit might make you more attractive but it doesn't make you a better lover and, even if it did, it would still be more important to find someone who wants to be a better lover that doesn't work out than one who does work out but is a bad lover, because someone who actually wants to be a good lover can always start going to the gym, while a bad lover will generally always be a bad lover. As such, going to t…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:57 PM
0

First of all, I never said anything about the gym and I am neither fat or skinny. The point was more about selfish lovers, guys who just think women are their to get their rocks off because they are gods gift to women or guys who just don't care. Secondly, working out doesn't make you a good lover. A guy that goes to the gym can still be a worse lover than a guy who doesn't. A woman picking a guy who goes to the gym, and expecting him to be a good lover because he goes to the gym, is picking tha…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:17 PM
1

If you mean issues that exclusively effect women? No, I really don't think there are any real issues exclusively affecting women. All the issues today's feminism are fighting for are either completely non-issues(if not direct products of misandry, or a very clear fear, disdain and contempt for men) or non-exclusive issues. Even in the middle-east, where there is this massive notion of female oppression, the same type of oppressive gender conformity affects men as well. If you just mean issues th…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:19 PM
3

Lol... the "orgasm gap". You know why men have more orgasm? Because they take don't expect other people to be responsible for their orgasm count. They do whatever they have to do to get off, generally without putting more burden onto women because they are taught not to(or, really, just because men are taught to be self-reliant). The only people men blame when they don't orgasm is themselves. That is why men have more orgasm. Women would have more orgasms if they were more proactive about their …
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:15 PM
3

The biggest fallacy about her statement is that women's problems are already solved, and they have demonstrated that all that happens then is that feminists will just come up, or make up, new problems to designate women as victims. It will never end. Under feminism, there will literally never be a time in which women's "problem" are solved, because they will keep moving the goal post. Each time further demonizing and harming men. If there was ever any truth to her statement, then men would be fr…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 02:37 PM
15

A white man wouldn't have gotten probation for that crime with that many prior felonies. Be real.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 01:31 PM
1

Not what I said. I asked if the title was important or not. It doesn't really matter if the content of the book is different(which, in this case, isn't) but rather that this is the first thing that people will see and how that might be important. Whether you believe in judging a book by its cover or not is irrelevant, because that title is still a representation of the book and what that book sells itself on. You are somewhat misappropriating the saying, because it's really just used as an argum…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:49 PM
1

If someone handed you a book that is titled "How to hate men", and the entire content of the book depicted numerous ways to hate men, and then that person said "hey, this is a really good book about love and fairness". a) would you really just take them at their word? b) do you really think the title, the first thing people see and how the book is presented, doesn't matter?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:37 PM
1

If you go to /r/feminism you will see the side bar say "Feminism is the pursuit of equality in regards to women's rights". Yes, we already established that this is the tag line feminists use. It is, however, completely false and disingenuous. Everything else about the sub demonstrates through word, action and definition that they are not about equality, so the false slogan is meaningless. Now i for one think that feminism has a lot to offer men Feminism not only has little to nothing to offer me…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 08:36 PM
1

I personally don't care what the movement is called Then why are you defending it? Why do you identify with it? If you don't care about it, why even bother with the label at all? might come from the fact that most feminist are women, if there was more male feminist then that wouldn't be a problem And, you don't think that might have something to do with the label, or the way feminism approaches every issue? You don't think putting women first and men last on every issue might be what appeals to …
/r/MensRights14/03/17 03:02 PM
1

Feminism is just a historic name though. Considering the importance that feminism has historically placed on names and labels, I find that hard to believe. If it was "just a name", then you clearly wouldn't be trying so hard to defend it as you are either. Clearly you are attached to that word, and it has significance to you, otherwise you would have no problems moving on from it. You wouldn't be here trying to defend a word that doesn't matter to you and that is clearly unequal, if equality was…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:34 PM
1

MRA's also don't claim that MRA by itself is synonymous to egalitarianism. They understand that it is simply one part of the equation that is severely lacking on a global scale. The redpill is also one small and isolated sub, whereas twoXC is 9 million strong and considered default worthy even though it is entirely built on a sexist premise. the huge amount of anti-feminism posts made here Anti-feminism doesn't mean anti-women, or even anti-women's rights. This is a distinction you have to make …
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:25 PM
1

I've seen some real mean things over at the red pill, I see some real mean shit over on twoXC, reddit and every feminist sub on a daily basis and, to make it worse, they are just casually accepted as the status-quo because it benefits women. That is hatred and it certainly doesn't convey equality. they often look at women as nothing but sex objects. Men don't want to date, love or have sex with "objects". I don't think you really know what actual objectification is. Male heterosexual attention o…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:39 PM
1

If the "idea of feminism" was equality, then it wouldn't be called feminism(directly implying an unequal premise/circumstance). And, when I speak about hatred driving this movement, I am not talking about extremists. Those are obvious and, even as those extremists are given countless platforms for feminism, I only consider them a symptom of the greater problem which feminism inherently exploits. There is a lot of social misandry that exists, and that feminism depends on to exist and persist. Thi…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:35 PM
3

Equality is a pursuit of equal rights for all, not just "equal rights for women because men are evil". Ignoring and belittling men's rights issues in favour of women's is not equality. Approaching the subject with an exclusive priority on women is not equality. Starting with this unquestionable premise that all women are oppressed or universally disadvantage is not equality or reality. Both by its definition and its history, feminism has not only established itself as being a direct opposition t…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 07:46 PM
17

This girl is amazing. Great video. One point I would even add to this subject is how ironic it is for these women to take the day off essentially banking on the fact that their bosses wound't reprimand them for it, if not literally exploiting the fact that their bosses might be too scared of being labelled misogynists to actually penalize them. All these women taking the day off are not demonstrating that they are irreplaceable, they are demonstrating that they are unreliable, entitled and actua…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:49 PM
5

I've said before and I will say it again. The main reason why you see so few women in gaming, or even competing at high levels, is misandry. I have seen it time and time again, over multiple generations. The vast majority of women do not care for video games because they look down on them and the men who play them. Girls grow up with a negative attitude towards gaming because they resent that male majority(even as they desperately seeks to include them) and detest meekness/nerdiness in men. Nerd…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 04:46 PM
1

Don't look at facts, logic or valid reasons/arguments, you have to read more books written by delusional feminists that fit my narrative!!!!
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:52 PM
7

"women deserve to be paid more money for less work, and to demonstrate this point, every woman should take a day off!" "women are oppressed, and to demonstrate how oppressed we are, every woman should take the day off!" It's pretty funny how this rally basically demonstrated that women not only aren't oppressed(men wouldn't even be able to take the day off, because they simply wouldn't have that luxury) but also literally demonstrated that a very large amount of women out there either do not tak…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:36 PM
13

Men don't talk about their problems to their friends because men have learned through experience that opening up to friends like that generally just ends up getting them burnt. It's generally met with either negative responses, apathetic responses or just silently locked away into memory only to be used against you later on. Immediate and vocal responses to these types of message typically fall into this spectrum of "meh, sucks to be you", to "TMI, didn't need to hear that", to "man up!", to "me…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:42 PM
1

Did they just assume that green person's gender?! Seriously though, those silhouettes are meant be look gender neutral. These people are just taking offence because they assume they are meant to be male and going out of their way to impose a gender on a genderless figure. It's pathetic that this kind of made up outrage is what feminists consider important issues.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:22 PM
6

Because feminists seem to hate science or believe that women have somehow transcended human biology. Realistically though, it's literally just an arbitrary thing that feminist have chosen to be outraged against because it gives them an excuse to be.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 02:23 PM
3

I have never had any issues taking any woman seriously just because she showed off her breasts. These two things are not mutually exclusive. I don't respect what Emma Watson says because it's sexist non-sense, not because there's sexually explicit pictures of her out there. If a pornstar had some really smart things to say, and the ability to express it well or back it up with facts, then it really wouldn't matter that she's a pornstar. The only people who seem to have a real problem with this i…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 06:02 PM
2

What's with the clickbait thumbnail?
/r/MensRights06/03/17 03:34 PM
3

TwoXC is an incredibly sexist and biased space. It is essentially the place where misandric women go to get validation for their actions/ideals from other misandric women, or to find ways to further absolve themselves from accountability and responsibility(it's never your fault if other like-minded/partial women tell you it's never your fault). Its entire premise is built on the exclusion and vilification of men in order to promote gynocentrism and a gender-segregated mind-set. If you go in ther…
/r/MensRights06/03/17 03:30 PM
3

I would say from its conception. It is a movement that is built on this idea that men oppress women, which has never really been true. Feminism has, if anything, exploited a pre-existing disposition of social/cultural favourism for women. Women have always had different means of power over men which were simply dismissed or ignore for this narrative that women are oppressed. Even female suffrage, viewed from a feminist perspective, resulted in unequal results(women never really had the restricti…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 08:28 PM
1

There are certainly a lot of men who have internalize that hatred, even to the point where it becomes a part of their sexuality, but those men still want to have sex with women too. Nothing could really take that biological/emotional drive out of them. They could mirror the same hatred for men or heterosexuality they see in a lot of women(because they love women) but they are still a part of it.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:52 PM
6

Patriarchy doesn't belittle men for their emotion, women/feminism does. Men might haze each other for being emotional but it's generally meant to be harmless fun. Women, on the other hand, will actually judge and legitimized men, both as human being and as sexual partners, for how stoic and masculine they present themselves. Patriarchy doesn't demonise men for their libido or their lust, women/feminism does. Men don't have that type of hatred towards their own sexuality, women have that type of …
/r/MensRights04/03/17 07:42 PM
26

The difference, however, is that the vast majority of men wouldn't call women doing the same thing as sexual predators or call for their public humiliation/extermination. They wouldn't call ugly women doing the same things as disgusting creeps for doing the same thing. The only difference would be whether or not they would enjoy the sexual acts, without ever diminishing those women's inherent sexual/romantic value and without vilifying/humiliating them for their sexual interest.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:29 PM
106

I think the point goes a little further than that though. This is a "hot guy" basically doing things that most men would otherwise get labelled as predatory, objectifying, disgusting or, to some extreme individuals, sexual harassment/assault(yes, some people actually qualify lewd comments to women as sexual assault). And yet, here are all these women completely unfazed and playing along to the same words that would otherwise be used as an example of patriarchy, female-oppression, the subjugation…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:24 PM
10

the world is your safe space I have literally never felt or been safe anywhere in this world. Men are routinely vilified and victimized in literally every aspect of life and society, both inside and outside the law. Men are more often the victims of violence and prejudice. Men are more often expected to put their lives, bodies and reputations at risk for the benefit of women. Men are dying both locally and abroad to serve women's interest and safety. Men make up for the majority of suicides, inc…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:05 PM
2

It would also be kind of nice to see the spending gap added also added to these numbers to show an even bigger disparity.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 02:29 PM
9

You are really naive if you think there's any actual difference between tinder or okcupid. There isn't. People are people, and not only is there probably a massive overlap between both sites but really they are all looking for whatever they want on any medium they can.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 02:27 PM
3

It's a sexist premise that is only viable because we live in a sexist society(both in the way women treat men they don't want to be approached by and in the expectations placed on men to approach women in the first place). Ironically, this could have been a really revolutionary approach simply by encouraging women to approach men in a positive way(changing the typical bar dynamic) but, instead, they just choose to go with the most derogatory message possible(essentially treating men like the pla…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 08:53 PM
3

The vast majority of our society seems to be in complete denial about the way women are conditioned to negatively respond to male attention(and which is unique to male-to-female attention, because that dynamic doesn't exist any other way). There is a massive amount of contempt, hatred and prejudice towards male heterosexual attention, which is completely learned(not innate) through culture and passed down from generation to generation(this is something that girls assimilate from other women, and…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 02:57 PM
10

I don't know how anyone could ever really question who is more romantic between men and women. Just listen to the media we consume on a daily basis. Most of the music written/sang by men basically reads out like a list of romantic things men would do for women and earn their love/attention. Most of the music written/sang by women basically read out like a list of entitlements they expect from men to abide to to even be acknowledged, or how much they hate/resent men or male attention. It's practi…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:35 PM
0

Somehow, I can't help shake the feeling that there is an incredible amount of bias driving this article and that there is a huge amount of anti-male prejudice from heterosexual women that would also affect how these women would respond to such surveys(if not even affect how they sexually respond to men or their expectations).
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:18 PM
1

I wonder, does she consider a man asking for a woman's bra size to be the worse because the guy was white or does she genuinely see all men doing this as the worse but also something non-white men would never do? From a purely objective stance, there is nothing inherently bad about asking for a bra size, unless you impose a negative predisposition, or project a negative sentiment, towards the question. If she only thinks it's bad because she associates it with white men and she's already negativ…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 05:53 PM
28

People really don't seem to get how there is this massive amount of negativity and contempt instilled into women when it comes to male attention, or just how hateful, destructive and irrational it really is. People just accept this disposition as the norm but it really shouldn't be. In no other circumstance would one person approaching another to compliment them, or come on to them, be considered worthy of rebuke but society enables women in treating men in any derogatory manner they want. If a …
/r/MensRights27/02/17 02:30 PM
3

I bet her "cold, hard, unemotional reading of the statistical data" approach would go out the window pretty quickly after hearing that one but, hey, she's not misandric because reasons, right?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:03 PM
5

These people are so far in denial about gender identity disorders and they can't even properly define it or explain it(ironic that he would consider himself enlightened). It's insane that this type of delusion could even get this far as an ideology, and even worse that it is being attached to a political movement which should really just stick to economic policy. Trying to redefine your "gender" based on superficial stereotypes associated to either gender, and altering your body to try to match …
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:33 PM
39

No one wants stinky, flappy penis to deal with later in life. Clearly, you are clueless about this subject and you should seriously consider educating yourself further on this subject before providing any kind of opinion on the matter.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:51 PM
16

Those are two completely different procedures, for very different reasons(one is cosmetic, the other is for fertility) and with very different risks(understandable to be more nervous when someone has a knife to your balls, as opposed to the tip of your penis), so the point is moot. If you were nervous about being circumcised as an adult, however, you would still be able to back out or say no, which is kind of the point. You going into a surgery as a consenting adult, should be able to handle it …
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:49 PM
1

Having two kids by the time you're 14 pretty much means your life is over, especially if you're a man. She is probably not going to support him or support the children(this woman is likely not very mature herself, if she is having sex with 12 year olds, and choosing to keep these pregnancies). That's pretty fucked up. You can argue that he wanted to have sex as much as you want(which is moot, because when older men have sex with younger women, they wanted it too) but the reality is that this guy…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:39 PM
1

you don't want to spend your evening with a beautiful women comparing comic book collections If I collected comics, and there were actually beautiful women out there who collected comics, I would probably be okay spending the afternoon comparing comics. Why not?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:16 PM
2

Why not something like "TwoXPrivilege" or "GynocentricImmunity".
/r/MensRights22/02/17 03:09 PM
1

Why not just stick with non-vulgar terminology? There's a lot of legitimate value in highlighting blatant double-standards and sexism, so why not just create a sub with some level of legitimacy and keep it clean?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 02:48 PM
7

A lot of that is literally just projection from sexist women, who just assume that all men are just as sexist as they are(and assuming that men would put other men first, because they would put other women first). The reality of it is, however, that the vast majority of men do not really serve other men, they prioritize women just like everyone else.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:33 PM
11

It's wrong to make fun of a man because he had a functional piece of his penis removed at birth(just as it would be wrong to laugh at anyone for any other deformity or mutilation) but it's also wrong to try to justify or rationalize circumcision as no big deal. There are no real benefits to circumcision and it most certainly does not decrease the chances of contracting HIV(this isn't just wrong, it's a dangerous misconception that leads to just more unprotected sex and, by extension, more HIV sp…
/r/MensRights17/02/17 02:28 PM
2

He literally said "when you are a star, they LET you do anything, they LET you grab them by the pussy". He didn't say "I just grab women by the pussy whenever I want". Two very different things.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 02:19 PM
4

It's kind of scary how easily these things can be abused. A woman who obtains a restraining order(basically, on her word alone) can easily use that restraining order to target innocent men who would then have to worry about a restraining order looming over their head(which would effect them personally/emotionally, because it certainly wouldn't feel good to be perceived this way, and socially, because it would be something that malign/disparage them) and also have to worry about potential legal r…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:14 PM
7

It's not just "he grabs pussies", it's "he grabs consenting adult women's pussies". Kind of an important yet often neglected distinction to make.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:31 PM
1

Men should be more aware of how much hatred is directed at them for their gender but not just in its more extreme forms either. Every day sexism, which is casually accepted, is the sexism that most men are just blind to, because they just are just told that it's the way the world works and learn to accept it as the norm. Just look at things like women-only gyms, which are almost everywhere and pretty much globally accepted without anyone really ever thinking about it. Yet, if you were to really …
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:11 PM
2

What the fuck is "alpha" women? People use this word to glorify anti-social and narcissistic behaviour far too much.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:25 PM
22

Ironic, given how this type of broadcasting reveals a definite hatred of men. Clearly, you're biased if you see women attacking famous men online in any way and think nothing of it(even when the stats prove that men are more abused online than women) but men attacking famous women online is "proof that men hate women". Just goes to show too though, how much feminism has controlled and twisted the narrative for so long that these people are in complete denial and shock to facts and reality standi…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 02:22 PM
1

She would be more hateful and discriminating towards men than the media accuses Trump of being towards Muslims/Mexicans, and no one outside this movement seems to care enough to point it out. It's sickening that she, holding as much power and influence as she does, could get away with saying shit like this, especially when others get slandered and vilified on a global for actions that don't even come close. She would have been horrible for the world, horrible for men and horrible for men's right…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 05:11 PM
2

Generally speaking, yes. Male circumcision should be stopped. It's wrong on so many levels, completely unnecessary and most of the reasoning behind it is inherently misandric. There are, however, a lot of circumcised men within the men's rights movement who are very defensive about their penis, as well as their upbringing(basically, justifying circumcision because they grew up with a circumcised penis being the norm). I assume also a lot of the methods used by intactivists might come off as bein…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 04:16 PM
5

Not only is it a hyperbole but it is also entirely dismissing how women choose to play into this narrative as well. The vast majority of men do not look down on women and not only recognize talent/skill in women but often over-glorify women/mothers on the basis of gender alone. That is the reality. However, it's also very common for women to completely cut short men who put women above them too. Men who view women as inferior, generally do far better with women because women then see those men a…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 02:44 PM
7

Jesus christ. I can't even believe just how backwards and absolutely demented their views on prostitution and men are. Men resort to prostitution when that is what is available to them. The only way you could "cure" these men, is by changing the way women treat those men or all men in general. You cannot remove the physical and emotional needs in men anymore than you could in women. These are basic fundamental human needs, that women simply get to take for granted because they are socially, sexu…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 03:18 PM
3

It's kind of ironic though considering they are using racing to make their point. Racers are, and have historically, been mostly male. Not because of gender discrimination or size differences(which wouldn't matter in a car), but because it's a dangerous form of competition where people(men) actually die(often in horribly gruesome ways). The reason why racing is so male dominated is specifically because people care less about men, or about the idea of men dying/burning, or just doing dangerous th…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:16 PM
1

It's kind of ironic though considering they are using "racing" to make their point. Racing is, and has historically, been male dominated. Not because of gender discrimination or size differences(which wouldn't matter in a car), but because it's a dangerous form of competition where people(men) actually die(often in horribly gruesome ways). The reason why racing is so male dominated is specifically because people care less about the idea of men dying and burning, or just doing dangerous thing for…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:02 PM
2

Female privilege is virtually never being expected to pick up the tab and, if you feel like working less or making less money because of it, then stores will literally charge you less in the unlikely case where you might feel like picking up the tab anyway. Female privilege is also being considered a VIP to that business over others, on the basis of gender alone.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:22 PM
5

How is this even a real procedure? You would think government would have a far more organized and professional setting than a bunch of people sitting in a room yelling at each other.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:26 PM
2

If feminists want more men to express their feelings the way women are allowed to, then the first thing they should fix is the way most women would negatively react to a man acting in a way that is unmasculine. Men don't just hide their emotions because of other men, they hide their emotion because emotional is something that women find romantically/sexually repulsive and heterosexual men are extremely sensitive to that(they kind of have to be, biologically speaking). You can't expect men to cry…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:54 PM
1

Not all issues existed before they crossed paths, the last one was created by her entrance and apathetic departure from his life. She is presented as someone who had the power to create something good into his life, simply by being there, which alleviated some of the bad weighing him down. Whether or not she is culpable or accountable for the impact she had on his life, being in a position of power, is a more complicated than simply "it's all on him because he has problems". There are certainly …
/r/MensRights30/01/17 04:47 PM
0

This should be marked NSFW.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 03:19 PM
20

The amount of women who can seemingly afford to take a few days off of work and fly across the country for a few days of protesting things that aren't even actually happening is pretty astounding, and if that doesn't scream privilege and entitlement I have no clue what would.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 08:31 PM
12

the power imbalance from being a star allows him to get away vs they consent to it Wtf..? That would literally make any kind of sex where a guy or girl finds a parter who they believe is out of their league rape. It would also literally make every celebrity rapists by definition. It's ridiculous. Being a star doesn't mean people are powerless or forced to fuck you. Every one of those women who really want to fuck a star are doing it because they want to. they marched for the reasons I suggested,…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:00 PM
38

We elected a president that said you should grab women by their pussies. You are the one painting a false narrative. His exact words were "when you are rich, they let you grab them by the pussy", which is clearly implying every form of consent feminists could possibly define. If a woman was to say something to one of girlfriends like "when you have huge tits, guys will let you do anything to them. They will even let you touch their dicks", no one would be in outrage over this or calling it sexua…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:29 PM
74

wear penis costumes Do you want to be arrested and be put on some kind of sexual offender's list?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:23 PM
1

Word lose their meaning when you're not actually using them in the right context. Either you have no idea what a white-knight is or you are completely unable to accurately identify one. Either way, you're not really accomplishing anything even remotely constructive. White knights are certainly a think but I am not one of them(certainly not in this argument) and their existence do not justify the same type of extremism in the opposite direction.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:54 PM
1

If you honestly think you have a right to kill someone because they slapped you, you seriously need to reconsider your perspective on life.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:51 PM
2

The Youtube comments (including by women) are about 90% in agreement that he was justified in the self-defensive maneuver. When did "all the youtube comments agree with me so I am right" start being a valid argument? This was not self-defence. It was simply a negligent, dangerous and absolutely excessive act of violence, and it doesn't really matter how many people on youtube support it. The reason you're so upset is because of your gynocentric instincts. It's not your fault, we all have an empa…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:49 PM
2

You're excusing female violence. Wtf?! How? I've literally stated many times that what she did was wrong. I am flat-out arguing that two wrongs don't make a right, which I have made very clear multiple times, and not that she was somehow justified in her attack. You are either twisting facts or have a very twisted sense of logic. The victim in this case was the man she assaulted Being a victim of assault does not give you a "free violence" card to use however you want. That is not self-defence. …
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:15 PM
2

I noticed that she also kicked him in the stomach The kick happened before the throw. By the time he had her in a position to throw her, she was no longer in a position to kick him. As stated before, there were also many other ways for him to protect himself without slamming her head onto the pavement. Anyway like I said, don't wanna be subjected to violence? Don't initiate violence There's are difference between defensive violence(striking someone to prevent a strike that is coming), equal reci…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 08:30 PM
2

Clearly this guy knew what he was doing, otherwise he wouldn't have been able to pull it off.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:03 PM
1

Self-defence doesn't give people the right to use whatever force they feel like using, nor is it some kind of license to kill, maim or cripple. That is not self-defence, that is using the notion of self-defence as an excuse or defence for assault. People have the right to defend themselves but this was not self-defence(nor is attacking someone after the fact, that is retaliation). Self-defence means you take action to prevent harm to yourself, which he could have completed in many other ways(he …
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:01 PM
1

I don't see anything justifiable about what this guy did. This was excessive and absolutely reckless. He literally slammed her head on pavement, which he absolutely should have been mindful of before even attempting the hip-toss(he knew what he was doing, clearly he has some wrestling/jujitsu experience to execute a throw like that). This not something that should be condoned, and the fact that he did it to a woman irrelevant. This would have been a fucked up thing to do to a man as well. There'…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:41 PM
0

I agree, and would definitely like to see more higher quality content in this sub, but facebook is social opinion, and social opinion is representative of social issues. For instance, my facebook wall since Trump has been inaugurated have been filled with posts about how horrible of a man he is because of pictures that make him look unchivalrous towards his wife. These are literally gender role expectations that are being imposed on him, which he is being judged and slandered for, because he is …
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:57 PM
1

And yet, height discrimination against men is based on gender roles and weight discrimination against everyone(because it's not just women who are judged based on weight) is not. Just like any other form of prejudice and discrimination based on gender roles, it is entirely unethical.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 03:59 PM
12

The video literally shows her throw the first punch. He walked past their blockade without actually hurting anyone and then SHE WALKS TO HIM AND TAKES A SWING AT HIM. She was literally assaulting him as he ate the punch and swung back(which is technically self-defence in that situation). Even if you were to ignore that, she was clearly doing something wrong, if not entirely illegal, by creating this blockade(which is not only illegal because you're deliberately blocking people in public place bu…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 03:28 PM
1

You would be surprised just how many women actually have no problems talking about men this way, and how little repercussions there are for them to actually speak/feel this way about men.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 02:35 PM
1

The words are part of the english language to specify human male and females. That is their definition and purpose, as a lot of people would find it taboo to use terms which do not differentiate between humans and non-humans. In other cultures/languages, it's entirely possible that there is no such distinction or that it is worded differently. The word person also already exists, as a more humane way to address human beings in a generic way, which is also fine. There are times where referring to…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 03:41 PM
1

People who believe there is a distinction between sex and gender are basing this on a complete and fallacious misinterpretation of what gender is. It stems from a delusion. That is not reality. Sex is gender. Gender is sex. "Man" is a word used to represent human males. "Woman" is a word used to represent human females. A man who "identifies" as a woman does so under a completely false and irrational interpretation of gender, which is literally nothing more than a set of stereotypes. It is wrong…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 09:18 PM
1

These are the same things. There is no distinction other than the one you are wrongfully creating. A man is a man because he is male, not because he likes things that other men traditionally like. A woman is a woman because she is female, not because she likes things that other women traditionally like. Cultural or historical trends do not define gender. This is a delusional fallacy, and an incredibly offensive one at that.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:55 PM
1

Speaking for myself I label myself as man based off the simple fact that I have no interest in makeup or dresses. That is the most superficial and misconceived view of gender you could possibly have. Not every woman cares about makeup and dresses. Some men care about makeup and dresses. What they like or care about does not define them as men or women. A man in a dress is still a man. That is his gender. His "identity" is that of a man in a dress, not a woman. Putting on a dress does not make hi…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 02:34 PM
5

I think the link between fatherless homes and all these negative statistics has a lot more to do with the lack of solid rolemodel/foundation, cultural misandry and gender roles than simply a lack of resource by those women(a lot of single mothers are receiving alimony and child-support and, while a lot of irresponsible mothers will mismanage that income, they are generally still provided for). I think the biggest reason why children raised by single mothers fail so much more is because most sing…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:45 PM
6

You can see it because you're the owner of the thread but it is absolutely removed. Also, for the record, the concept of a sub for "men and women's rights" isn't really new. There are many subs on reddit dedicated to egalitarianism. The reality of it is, however, that a major obstacle to egalitarianism is feminism which believes that women should always be the priority and have the monopoly on gender rights because they are "oppressed by the patriarchy".
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:29 PM
1

It definitely stems from a very sexist outlook on life, and it probably affects how she behaves on a day to day basis too. She probably comes from this entitled mindset of "I don't have to do anything or make any decisions, because I'm a woman", and likely often puts the burden of responsibility/accountability on men in her life(and, if she isn't happy, it's their fault). This is a fairly common attitude with a lot of women. She is, essentially, insulting herself and women in general when she sa…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 04:11 PM
1

It's a problem caused by religious fundamentalism and established societies to properly handle and address religious fundamentalism. A lot of that is fear of political incorrectness but a lot of that is also just an issue of faith and religious beliefs still being a dominant influence in today's societies.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:26 PM
2

I like how the narrator is painting this in the worse light possible, commenting about how unwelcoming the men are but, if you understand French, the guys in the caffe were literally as sympathetic as they could possibly about turning these women away for the sake of their religion and explaining themselves(if anything, the woman in the video was the one taking an aggressive tone and escalating the situation). If this had been the other way around, with a man invading a "female-only space", thin…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 02:51 PM
2

How to tank an established property: insult and demonized your established and previously devoted customer base to appeal to a new demographic that doesn't really give a shit about comics in the first place. The irony is that these quips are not only incredibly sexist but, quite literally, designed to try to over-cater to women who weren't really interested in comics to begin with because they have this delusion that comics are for men and therefore bad(because they themselves hold some very sex…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:35 PM
2

It's called "men's lib" because it's essentially a sub for men who want to be liberated of their testicles, or perhaps more aptly just be liberated from the burdens of being male through servitude. It's like a religious cult, where men can gather to embrace their collective guilt of being male(the original sin!), look for ways to better serve the great vagina and confess their patriarchal sins to atone for their genitals.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:18 PM
2

Radical manhating feminists are rare and only a small group used to demonize all feminists okay, lets proceed to the issue of toxic masculinity... Couldn't really get more ironic, or moronic, than that. This person is clearly a part of the problem and the very type of manhating feminists he/she is trying to dismiss.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:08 PM
2

Feminism hasn't changed and it didn't get corrupted, it is the same movement it always was. Feminism was never about equality, it was always about misandry and meant to serve or militarize women's interests, desires and entitlements.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 02:31 PM
1

Or, this is a clear example that self-hatred over gender is an actual thing? That these beliefs, when internalized and allowed to develop within children, leads to mental issues and gender identity disorders? Maybe, treating gender dysphoria as non-issue, or something to be ignored, accepted or embraced does more harm than good?
/r/MensRights22/12/16 02:48 PM
10

People don't seem to get that personal opinion or biases can often affect the objectivity people are supposed to have in their profession. This is a clear case of pre-existing prejudices and misconceptions driving a conclusion but it happens all the time. Even more so when there is a clear incentive for these people to cater to a certain audience/demographic, or to sensationalize certain opinions for more views/profit. As a psychologist, you would think the inability/unwillingness for most heter…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 02:58 PM
6

It's think it's easy to try to pass the blame off to the work culture of japan but that really isn't the root of the problem. As it shows in the video. You wake up. You go to work. You finish work. You go home. You go to bed. These are men who are working this hard because that's what they are told they need to do to build a successful life with women. It's not like internet dating wouldn't exist in Japan either, or like there couldn't be any social opportunities inside or outside of work. The w…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 05:22 PM
19

I don't understand how people can watch this and not see it social/cultural problem for men. A man wouldn't be interacting with a machine, as depicted in this advert, if he hadn't exhausted every other option. This is literally desperation for basic fundamental human connection, and it is a market-base that is entirely created by things like unfair gender roles, hypergamy, male-heterosexual vilification, existing cultural expectations of masculinity and the general antipathetic manner that women…
/r/MensRights16/12/16 04:15 PM
1

One relies on a sexist presumption that all women are at risk and all men are not(or that men's safety doesn't matter). One relies on the assumption that their customer base wants the type of hair cut they specialize in.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:25 PM
1

I am pretty open to the idea of the english language moving forward with words that can be used to describe a person, without gender being their defining trait. In a way, we are already doing this(compare english to french, where every single word is gendered). What I am not open to, however, are people trying to force these words onto others or using these words to actively discriminate against individuals or to push other ideals which may be destructive/unhealthy(like, for example, an effort t…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:28 PM
9

If ze/xe was ever to go mainstream, it would only be a matter of time before it replaces 'it' to describe objects because objects are genderless. Could just be that 'it' is dehumanizing because it is genderless, and therefore inherently not "human"(every human being is either male or female, it is inherent to our species).
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:23 PM
1

if you're with a woman who's making you feel bad because you have emotions, you are a thousand times better off without that woman in your life. This is a systematic problem, not just a few isolated women who act as a hated minority. These are expectations that are culturally adopted by women, which other women collectively emulate, encourage and legitimize. There are certainly women who grow to empathize with their significant other, especially as they mature over the years, but those women wil…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:57 PM
1

When these are behaviours which are emulated by the greater majority of the population, it's more than just a problem of individuals. Speaking in absolutes is simply a method to address the situation as it is. It's a hyperbole, and I think everyone here except you understands that, but it's a meaningful hyperbole for the purpose of this conversation.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:54 PM
1

It's like with short men. When women are asked if short men should be treated the same way tall men should be treated, their answer is virtually always "ofcourse!", but then when you ask them "so would you ever date a short man?", they always answer in some variation of "ewww. no. never.". They don't see how these two sentiments conflict, how these predispositions affect men or how these personal negative predispositions stem from pre-existing social biases(which they are reinforcing/perpetuatin…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:29 PM
28

I think you would be surprised exactly how many of those women would react towards emotional men, and then write it off as a "preference", when it really comes down to it.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:34 PM
12

Not only that but, realistically, the vast majority of men wouldn't really care about another man telling him to "man up". Even if other men judged them negatively for it, they would take it with a grain of salt, because it doesn't really affect them in any real capacity(unless maybe in a professional setting). Constantly being judged by women for crying, however, actually does have a direct and tangible impact on men. It affects their romantic/sexual opportunities. It affects their capability t…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:31 PM
30

Maybe you don't understand what patriarchy means, or maybe you are just misunderstanding how others are understanding it? Patriarchy theory, regardless of how it is upheld or reinforced, still assumes men in a position of power and authority, which is not only false(women have power and authority) but also contradictory(if women uphold and reinforce patriarchy, then they have power and there is no patriarchy) and harmful(calling it "patriarchy" only serves to further delegitimize and vilify men,…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:19 PM
13

I consider myself a feminist. I have a ton of friends who would say the same of themselves. They would think that the article shitting on guys for crying is harmful for all. I have known a lot of women who have called themselves feminists and who might have even agreed with this on principle, but who held men to completely different standards in their personal lives(basically "it's okay if men cry but I would never date/fuck a man who cries"). Those women also typically viewed this general socia…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:09 PM
18

As someone with several sisters and who has met numerous women over the years, Are you basing this on how they acted towards you or how they acted towards other men(i.e. possible romantic/sexual suitors)? Because there's a big difference. Close relatives or friends who see you cry will generally feel very much empathetic and sympathetic, but that is also because it is a completely different relationship in a completely different dynamic. who've told us to man up after the family dog died Only cr…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:48 PM
6

I don't think reversing the gender could work here because I cannot even remotely imagine a world where two men would go around stabbing women with knives for things like groping(or any form of unwanted touching). Men just do not have that kind of hatred and resentment for women in them. The closest scenario that I could think of would be two religious extremist men going around throwing acid into women's faces for crimes against their religion(like, having an abortion or walking around without …
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:39 PM
25

I can't really disprove you one way or another but, even if I was to take you at your word and you were being completely honest with yourself, you would still be in a very clear minority. My statement was hyperbolic, so it wasn't really meant to be taken personally. I would like to think there are more women out there who don't judge men this harshly on this basis but I have never met a single woman(of any age/income/ethnicity) who has felt this way, except for the occasional case of "super hot …
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:25 PM
3

This was a great video. Feminism has created this world where men just cannot win and where there is just as much disdain for men who are aggressive as there is for men who aren't. Men are told that they are basically sexual predators for having or expressing any kind sexual/romantic interest in women(which hot guys will simply get a pass on, allowing women to criminalize guys they aren't attracted to and better filter out their options) but men are also told they they aren't really men at all f…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 02:56 PM
5

That is pretty insane. Doesn't look like that user is a mod there anymore though.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 02:19 PM
417

"From Tammy Hughes", and here I though it was the patriarchy telling men not to cry. I am shocked! I wonder if there has ever been a time where one woman saw a man cry and thought to herself "I respect him that much more now as a person and as a man, and him crying makes him that much more desirable to me".
/r/MensRights12/12/16 02:13 PM
4

Have you ever seen women's advice columns or gynocentric subs like twoXC? All men are always wrong, no matter what, and all men are always the enemy and considered serial killers/rapists by default. Anything that can be misconstrued or misinterpreted, will be. Anything that can be twisted or maligned, will be. Every doubt, insecurity or irrational fear will be instantiated and validated. Every whim and preference will be echoed back. Every request for affirmation will be met. Every privilege, pr…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:12 PM
1

Sorry, gender is whatever you imagine it to be, therefore you are a still a rapist.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:24 PM
1

Ah, yes, because the anus and the vagina are equivalent. Biology!
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:19 PM
2

As a female runner, I am constantly aware of my safety when I’m out on an evening run. What is behind me? Do I hear anything strange? Why is that man running towards me? What is making those bushes rustle? Like, do you think men don't have these same instincts? That, despite the million of years of evolution, contemporary men somehow managed to overcome their own self of survival and self-preservation? That men just run around completely oblivious to any and all dangers, waiting for them around …
/r/MensRights07/12/16 03:58 PM
2

Realistically though, men who groom their bodies(shave chests, armpits, backs or genitals) probably still do during November. They also do still get hair cuts for the most part. The whole no-shave thing is only really for facial hair. There is no female equivalent, and that was really kind of the point to begin with. It started as an concept to generate money for diseases predominantly affecting men, which were completely being ignored and dismissed in lieu of diseases affecting women. If women …
/r/MensRights07/12/16 02:23 PM
63

do not fight sexism by being sexist to men "#feminism" pick one. equality doesn't start with the letter f.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:57 PM
1

There's probably a lot fewer men who are into the "christmas spirit" because there's a lot more men who are apathetic or depressed. Probably there's also why there's generally more suicides around that time of year too.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 07:31 PM
3

I kind of disagree with Jordan's conclusion about Scandinavia where he basically says something like "well, they eliminated cultural differences and that has only exaggerated the biological differences". The problem is that they didn't really eliminate cultural differences. You can't just assume that cultural influence is non-factor and that biological influence is dominant when cultural influence are still just as present as ever(if anything, equality of opportunity means that it's a lot easier…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 04:22 PM
3

What a genius concept! So, basically, everything that black people say that I don't like is blacksplaining, and if I lived in Sweden I could just create a business that would basically allow non-black people to call in to complain and laugh about black people having opinions. Also, if any black people had a problem with that, I could literally just dismiss that as blacksplaining too.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 09:27 PM
2

My avast also blocked this page detecting a virus or malicious software.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 06:47 PM
20

men's potential for violence which is so damning. You know what makes me laugh about this argument, is how they will literally use this against men even when those men are smaller, weaker or meeker than your average man, and also be completely missed when it comes to any woman that is bigger, stronger and meaner than your average woman(apparently, these aren't scary or threatening at all, and their potential for violence just doesn't matter). What's even more disturbing is how often women will l…
/r/MensRights24/11/16 06:12 PM
10

This isn't really a new attitude. There's always been this somewhat popular notion that if a woman cheats on a man, it's because he wasn't a "real man" and her cheating is justified because "that's just her preference" and therefore cannot be held accountable for her actions.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 09:04 PM
1

Yes, because in all the cases of men hitting women throughout history, none of them were never told that it's not okay to hit a woman. Clearly, ten years from now, when a man decides he wants to hit a woman he will look back on this day and remember "oh wait! I made a pledge all that time ago!". Men who hit women know they shouldn't be hitting women, they just do it anyway because they either don't give a fuck, think the circumstances warrant it anyway or lose control of their own tempers. Not o…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:27 PM
18

Why couldn't he just wear the condom without cutting a piece of his penis? Also, if your partner is committed enough to cut a piece of his dick for you, presumably despite the fact that you're already having sex together, where the fuck are all these other STD's coming from? For this to happen, then clearly one of you would have to be cheating and my money would be on the one that didn't just get a piece of their genitals cut to make the other happy.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:25 PM
7

Female vervet monkeys manipulate males into fighting battles by lavishing attention on brave soldiers while giving noncombatants the cold shoulder I don't understand how this behaviour could be any kind of surprise to anyone, and it's why it drives me nuts when people say shit like "if women were in charge, there would be no war" or "women have never had any systematic/personal power". Women are clearly capable of dictating men's actions, and shape those actions to suit their beliefs and interes…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 04:01 PM
9

It's ridiculous that they would even try to make this argument when women are literally not barred from any tournaments in any e-sport whatsoever, and have never really been for the longest time in the history of e-sports. A woman performing at the top level and out-performing men would literally be praised as the second coming of christ, it just doesn't really happen. There are no "men only" tournaments, only "women-only tournaments" designed to exclude men and to give a small minority of the p…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 10:05 PM
3

She stated that she was misquoted but she still said some fairly insidious things which they quoted her on. Without all the facts, this might be more of a case of a post-interview regret, where she said some pretty misleading, false or misandric things and then realized after the fact that this might impact her negatively so she recanted her views, than actually being misquoted. Like, I can believe her that she might not have know the BBC was throwing out some slanderous hit piece against e-spor…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 06:38 PM
1

Yes, because taking about as much room as the seat allows is the same thing as sitting across multiple seats. Fucking idiots.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:19 PM
3

The vast majority of men for the entire of human history, and it's kind of a major obstacle to the men's rights movement and gender equality when women hold so much power over men in this regard. The fucked up part is that this guy is basically encouraging sexual/emotional blackmail from women. "Do what women tell you, no matter how unfair or unethical it may be, or you will live alone, unloved and celibate". It's a really messed up and dangerous mindset. If you're in a place where the majority …
/r/MensRights18/11/16 06:41 PM
14

did you literally just say that we need to pander to white men? Like, why is she pulling this out like it's not some pretty racist and sexist shit to say(not to mention, completely off-base). You should be trying to pander to everyone, and be equal/fair to everyone, including white men. White men are just as relevant and important as everyone else, and are still(despite sjw's best efforts, still a major part of this country). What kind of fucking attitude is that?
/r/MensRights18/11/16 06:20 PM
9

This doesn't fix the problem if the next girl you meet is the same way, and then the next girl, and then the next girl(if there are even any next girls). No one will be on your side and it won't change these behaviours from women on a social scale because society will continue to accept these behaviours from women. In the end you just end up being alone because you basically failed to adapt or compromise to the world as it is. Telling men they are spineless for not rejecting women for doing thin…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 03:47 PM
28

The most frustrating part of that post for me was the top comment. "Pro Tip: Do not date women like this." This person clearly doesn't really seem to get that women aren't generally forthcoming about things things or exactly how common these kind of behaviours are from women(if not simply because women will support and encourage each other through these behaviours, or because women are often practically exempt from any kind of real accountability for their actions). Secondly, most men do not hav…
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:43 PM
1

They should just add an ex girlfriend dummy then, or make it gender neutral. Either way it really doesn't make sense to just make this an anti-male thing when female character in world of warcraft literally have the exact same stats as male characters and literally die by the thousands every day because it's a damn war game.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 03:54 PM
3

That's because men just cannot tell people these things. Not only do people not really give a shit but telling them would almost always invoke negative responses. Depression is weakness. Weakness is unmasculine. A lack of masculinity in a man means women don't want to talk to you(let alone want to fuck you), friends don't want to be around you(because they want women to talk to them too), employers think less of you(and probably get worried about your ability to do your job). Showing weakness as…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 03:50 PM
1

Ironically, it seems clear that feminism and it's long history of radicalism and anti-male rhetorics are hurting women in politics a lot more than they realize. How the fuck would you expect men to trust, and vote for, someone like Hillary who echoes those same exact sexist sentiments? And, yeah, clearly not every woman is going to blindly support someone who is clearly dangerous to the men in their lives, just because she is a woman.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:22 PM
1

It was an attempt at brigading.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 02:11 PM
7

If you live in a country that has a white majority... it might not be a good political move to have your party run on a platform of "fuck you white men, all you do is rape and oppress and you should just fucking die already". Like, maybe, Trump wouldn't have gotten as far as he did if Hilary didn't pander to, support and give legitimacy to feminist extremism and constant anti-white-male rhetorics.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:46 PM
9

Seriously. There's a huge difference between "a hormone drug with minor and temporary negative side effects" and "a hormone drug that is literally fucking with the very basis of what physically and biologically makes you appear and function as a male". The physiology/biology is different and male hormones are both more fragile and more fundamental to men than female hormones are to women. Any noticeable decrease in masculine appearance or "masculinity" would be devastating to any man physically,…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:24 PM
0

How do you know what Obama says in private, or how he speaks to certain people in private? How he speak to the public is one thing, how he speaks with his colleagues, his family, his friends, his wife or his close friends would all probably be different.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:22 PM
2

"should" and "be required to" are two different things. Presidents are people too and I can guarantee you that every leader, male or female, in the history of mankind and in every country has said tactless things their lifetimes. This was also literally crass talk made in private, which also happens to have been recorded. If you followed every presidential candidate with a microphone without their knowledge or consent, it won't really take long before you catch them saying something without "tac…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:19 PM
25

I've found this incredibly frustrating too. There are actually people who are trying to paint this narrative of "Hilary lost because she's a woman!", which is not only completely untrue. 99.999999% of voters are fine with a female president. Virtually everyone in america has some form of female authority/leader in their lives, whether that's a female boss, a teacher, a parent, a mentor, a legal representative or even a wife. Female leaders are already part of our lives and have been for longer t…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:21 PM
15

'if you dont mind my strong and independent womyn friend, i'd quite love to touch your gen-tales, do you mind if i do? if not its totally ok and i respect your choice and dont think more or less of you because of it.' Women literally and overwhelmingly shame and delegitimize heterosexual men for not acting in an assertive sexual manner with women, if not specifically because they themselves do not wish to take the lead or teach inexperienced men. They will call those men meek, unmasculine, unman…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:55 PM
30

That means millions of people are supporting a man, who was recorded on tape saying he helps himself to women's bodies. I honestly hate trump but shit like this I hate even more. It's slander and misrepresentation, and used as a source of outrage in an explicitly gendered way(how many women still joke about being able to grab a guy by the balls?). He was recorded on tape saying something along the lines of "when you're powerful, you can just grab women the pussy". This is not "helping himself to…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:16 PM
36

A lot of "progressives" aren't really "progressive".
/r/MensRights09/11/16 04:03 PM
1

You can't hold twoxc(or even trollxc) to the same standards men are held to because we live in a cultural climate where sexism against men is considered non-existent(even when staring blatantly into it) and gloating about touching a consenting woman's vagina is literally rape(and any/all false accusations of sexual assault are acceptable arguments). There's also a lot of hateful and ignorant people out there who don't really care about this climate, let alone recognize it, and who have no proble…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:31 PM
13

This really was a no-win situation for the men's rights movement. On the one hand, Hillary was an incredibly misandric woman who routinely got a pass for it because she is a woman. On the other, Trump doesn't really seem to give a shit about equality or men's rights, and would sooner tell men to "man up" than try to help. On one hand, we would have had a female president that every feminists would have used against men in every argument ever. On the other, feminists will use trump's win to furth…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:27 PM
50

Losing friends is the price to pay for a progressive/critical mind. You can't be different or independent without pissing some people off.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:53 PM
12

You realize when people say "the vagina vote", they aren't necessarily just talking about women voting for a woman because she's a woman(which are, really, just being incredibly sexist), which there are a lot of, but also men who are voting for a woman because she's a woman(which are also being completely sexist) and men who are voting for a woman because they are under the impression that showing favour for a female president would gain them favour with women(who are mostly just incredibly naiv…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:39 PM
3

I regularly hear women complaining about men at the gym and how it intimidates them or makes them feel insecure, So, are they intimidated by women bigger than them? Do they feel insecure around prettier, fitter and bolder women? If so, then why segregate based on gender? If not, then why is gender the determining factor?
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:43 PM
3

That's not really the same thing though, because barbershops are basically just businesses specialized in doing hair/beards for men. Hair salons don't generally trim your beards. It's a different service for legitimate reasons. A woman can still go into a barbershop and get a haircut. It may not do as good of a job, depending on the style she's going for, because they aren't equipped to deal with them. A man with very long and fancy hair probably wouldn't really be going to a barbershop for styl…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 02:40 PM
12

Transwomen aren't transitioning to female because being a guy sucks; they're transitioning because of dysphoria There's not really any actual evidence to dispute that that the dysphoria itself(a mental disorder) does not stem from social conditioning. i.e. being a man sucks, very few male issues are properly identified(if even acknowledged) and very little help is provided for boys who suffer because of it, and this can lead to a lot of men/boys developing psychological issues because and over t…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:07 PM
3

BUT FEMINISM IS ABOUT EQUAL RIGHTS BETWEEN MEN AND WYMENZ!
/r/MensRights02/11/16 08:59 PM
14

It's hilarious because on more than a few occasions, someone in this podcast essentially says something like "I believe feminism is for the equality of both sexes", right before saying something incredibly sexist and anti-male. I don't think they know what the meaning of "both sexes" actually is.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 02:19 PM
3

Pretty sure there were a lot of female germans at the time who approved of Hitler's actions. He wasn't created in a vacuum and he wouldn't have gotten into power without peer approval, which includes both women and men acting on behalf of women's interests. Even if these things had all been done exclusively by men(which isn't the case), they would all be things that were done for the benefit and interest of women. These are things that men would have done for both themselves and women, and with …
/r/MensRights31/10/16 03:01 PM
2

There's a difference between male reproductive rights and the argument of whether or not someone should be forced to carry a child or to abort based on the father's choice. This poster seems to be taking this argument to an even more ridiculous extreme of "men shouldn't be able to force women to fuck them", which literally no one has ever argued for in the first place.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:10 PM
5

I really don't understand her argument. No one has ever really claimed that men have a right to reproduce or to women's bodies. If anything, the only people who are making this type of arguments are feminists, when they argue that women have a right to reproduce without men. Her argument should essentially mean that women should not have the right to reproduction either, and that any kind of unconsented or involuntary use of a man's sperm should therefore be criminalized.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:14 PM
3

This is like reading the diaries of a schizophrenic.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:09 PM
11

Objectification has lost so much of its meaning, it's pathetic just how often feminist throw that word around to vilify male attention. A woman who is trying to be a sexual tease is not "objectifying" herself. Men looking at women or being attracted by their physical appearance is not "objectifying" those women. There are some big fundamental differences between treating someone like an actual object and being attracted to someone, and people really need to stop using the terms interchangeably.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 03:00 PM
24

The troubling thing for me is that this is just one case that does it in the open(mostly because there are no real repercussions typically for women like this). The reality is that there are women who do these types of things, in various degrees or different ways, but who are far more subtle about it, and they get away with it every time because they are women and because their victims are men(weak or vulnerable men no less, which get even less sympathy for being weak or vulnerable as men).
/r/MensRights25/10/16 07:56 PM
6

A sexual organ is involved, discordance is involved and attacker being forceful and predatory is involved. That's the exact definition of sexual assault though. Rape would be forcing a typical sexual act on someone, and kicking a guy in the balls is not considered a typical sexual act(even if you're into that kind of stuff). Shoving a bat into a woman for the purpose of pain and humiliation would be considered sexual assault, not rape(at least, as far as I know).
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:42 PM
1

I don't get what your argument is supposed to be, or how it could even be considered a defence. She had a boyfriend and most likely had more experience with sex/dating than the student. She was in a position of power sexually and socially. She had every other opportunity to get support or sexual needs met by any other means. There is no justifiable way for her to legitimately use the "I was vulnerable and taken advantage of" as a defence.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:30 PM
18

That's pathetic. Not just because she was the 24 year old adult and dealing with a 17 year old, but because this is coming from a clearly attractive/fit woman in the prime of her life. It's not like she didn't have options. A 24 year old male kiss-less virgin with no real experience with women or intimacy would be "emotionally/sexually vulnerable"(not that any court would ever accept that kind of defence from a man). An attractive 24 year old woman would have, if anything, access to countless ma…
/r/MensRights19/10/16 02:30 PM
1

That's kind of fucked up. I don't even understand how something to blatantly sexist and ignorant(not to mention, incredibly dishonest given that women contribute to war waging as much as a men) was even allowed to be in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 05:36 PM
6

Well, that's another aspect of it too. Men are often very much chastised by women for trying to help them. How often do men get told not to treat women like children or as damsels in distress, and that's exactly what a man helping would be accused of doing. There are certainly women who would also lash out at a man trying to intervene specifically because they are feeding from the drama or because they enjoy/desire the abuse. There are also women who will lash out at intervening men because, des…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 05:50 PM
22

I think there's two obvious reasons why men in this scenario didn't interfere as much(ignoring the possibility that there were simply fewer men present at the park). One, the risk of escalation and physical violence is far more real for men than it is for women. Men don't have that protected class status, and couldn't really get away with doing with a lot of those women did in a real situation. You can even notice how oblivious to the threat a lot of these women were, one even mentions it(turnin…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:59 PM
4

Most men have an adverse reaction to being "feminized" because, their entire lives, they have been punished every time they've been viewed as even remotely feminine. Most of all by women who would shame, belittle and delegitimize(sexually, romantically and socially) them for it almost instantly. An overwhelming majority of women do not want feminine men, or men who behalf the way your typical woman would, and have some very strong existing expectations and entitlements over what men should do fo…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:10 PM
1

7% of women identify as feminists. Doesn't mean there aren't still a shit load of women with misandric traditional ideals, a shit load of women with misandric feminist ideals and a shit load of women who manage to have both at the same time. A lot of women choose not to identify as feminists not because they care about men or genuine gender equality but because they don't have the energy to pull the constant mental gymnastic your typical feminists has to do to maintain so many double-standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 05:54 PM
3

You can offer to split the bill if funds are low, too. Obviously, some guys might accept this because they’re cheap, haha, yes, because equality at the restaurant means the guy is just cheap. Flawless logic. Remind me how feminism is all about equality again, please. Though watch out for the dudes who bring you to a much more expensive place when it’s your turn to pay. I’ve dated that guy. First of all, have a fucking backbone and have some input into where you go(especially if you can't afford …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 05:50 PM
6

But that's not what you wrote. Just saying, maybe you should check your sentences before trying to bash others about their "punctuation".
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:54 PM
1

You want me to write this out again with the punctuation of a three year old? Why..?
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:47 PM
-3

"Are you a feminist?" could become the male equivalent of "are you shorter than me and do you earn less money than me?" These are not equivalent. Women asking men if they believe a woman's purpose is to live in the kitchen and serve her man would be a more appropriate comparison. "Do you respect women" and "do you respect men" are comparable and pertinent questions to ask here. General judgements placed on men based on height or income are something else entirely, and far less justified then whe…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:41 PM
1

It is the man's job to make the first move because women will never take the initiative. This is a cultural problem, not a biological one. If women valued men the way men value women, they would make the first moves too.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 01:27 PM
5

Just because you take something seriously, doesn't mean you can't make jokes. These things are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:51 PM
6

I don't think it's an age thing but rather more of a circumstances thing. There are certainly some men out there who grew up oblivious to how their sexuality is vilified. Men who always had it easy with women and therefore never really noticed all the bad(or maybe the good just far outweigh the bad for them). A lot of men are also just taught not to care about any of it and to just not give a fuck and do whatever they want anyway(probably why men without fathers are generally more susceptible to…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:49 PM
1

If the opinions of a 15 year old girl are the same as the opinions of a 30 year old men, then it really makes no difference where it comes from. The only reason why you would go ask a bunch of 30 year old the same question is either selection bias(also more likely to get the answer you might want to hear) or straight up sexism/ageism(don't want to hear it from someone who isn't male or over 30).
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:41 PM
29

Except this is not a social risk anymore. This is a legal risk. The emasculation of man has been signed into law, men would be stupid to ignore it. It's not just a social or legal risk, it's become an ethical fundamental at this point. You can't just "take a risk" because you've grown up being told that you're literally disrespecting her, and all women, if you do. You can't just "take a risk" because you've been told most of your life that being assertive or misinterpreting interest made you a p…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:16 PM
2

Honestly, it bothers me that they are using the term "gendered language" in that context. English is not a gendered language. It uses gendered words specifically to identify people or people's genders. Languages like french are gendered languages, because every fucking thing has a gender. A window is feminine. A desk is masculine. A machine is feminine. A computer is masculine. That's a gendered language. It's dumb as fuck but it is the way it is. Using words like male and female to identify mal…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:11 PM
9

BUT THE GENERIC ONE ISN'T PINK AND I LIKE THE PINK ONE MORE!!!
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:06 PM
3

Assuming this isn't all fake(because I seriously question the integrity of anyone who actually tries to assert that women pay more for things than men), it would have been more interesting to see the different reactions from customers if they had compared two scenarios(one where women have to pay more, and one where men have to pay more).
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:05 PM
8

So... no french?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 02:34 PM
12

Yeah, I agree. Her perspective on this is entirely self-serving. She isn't against affirmative consent because he's demeaning and vilifying of boys, she's against it because it makes her life more difficult. She's against it because she still believes it's a "man's job" to make the first move, and that men who don't do it are lesser men because of it(essentially judging them for not doing something something she doesn't want to be doing herself, which is a major double-standard).
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:45 PM
63

So.. basically she wants men(presumably rich, powerful and/or attractive) to "man up" and just grab her by the pussy if needed?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:41 PM
29

lol. That's hilarious. Do they not understand how they are literally making a giant joke of their own premise? It's not "ask men over 30" if you just ban the men over 30 you don't want to hear from. Then it's "ask people who share the moderator's views". If you want the views and opinions of men over 30, because they are men over 30, then don't fucking block men over 30 from posting in your sub. That being said, the entire premise of their sub is literally one giant ad-hominem. Even if they had …
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:25 PM
2

lol, that's horrible. That's not even close to a realistic portrayal of gas lighting. You can't just convince people they did something someone else did, even if they are drunk every night of the week(and, seriously, why would you even keep drinking if that was even remotely the case).
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:23 PM
6

Right, no one is saying that she is. People believe she is in the right. The problem is that when you have situations where the genders are reversed, people would have been in arms for not providing two women shelter from a man they didn't want to interact with.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:08 PM
9

If it was two women complaining to the host because they felt "unsafe" next to a man, there would be hell to pay for not accommodating them. It's funny how these kind of segregatory practices are completely okay when they favour women(like "women's only gyms", because they don't want to work out around men for personal or religious reasons) but totally not okay when they favour men(like these two men in particular). Hell, I'm pretty sure if this case had been two women complaining about being se…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 05:06 PM
21

I don't remember the original ghostbusters shooting goser in the vagina as some kind of statement. I don't remember the original ghostbusters making every female character completely evil/dumb, and every male characters complete marie-sues. I don't remember the original ghostbusters reading email about "men-haters trying to shut their movie down". The movie is full is subtle missandry and feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 01:13 PM
1

Today I came across a video about a female model who had a male grope her without her consent and she responded by physically attacking him in self defense. Which I believe is justified. If a woman had groped a male model without his consent, and he responded with physical violence, would you really believe it to be justified though? I don't understand this response, or why people don't question this more. Groping and violence are two very different things, and violence of any kind is considerab…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:00 PM
-2

You realize that the "LGBT community" doesn't really represent all gay people, right? You realize that the "LGBT community" has also largely been co-opted by the "trans community"(or, at the very least, the trans movement has exploited their popularity and political position)? The 'T' in LGBT has literally nothing to do with sexual freedom/rights, and yet these two movements still operate under the same umbrella/label. If the LGBT movement didn't exist as it is and this person was wrongfully bun…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:34 PM
1

I love towards the end she basically goes "if he's too much of a pussy to be able to accept the finger from a woman that's his problem but I'm the victim!". Irony.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:18 PM
3

I just don't understand the reasoning of "he's driving behind me=OMG HE'S GOING TO KILLRAPE ME IN FRONT OF MY INFANT SON!" and "me calling him a fucking racists and giving him the finger = peaceful protest".
/r/MensRights23/09/16 04:11 PM
1

I like how this lady pulls up to man calls him a fucking racist and gives him the finger, and doesn't consider any of that as threatening or harassment, but a guy that follows her(presumably to get her licence plate and report being harassed) without ever actually threatening or addressing her she considers to be threatening and harassment. Like, you can't really have it both ways, and you can't really just presume a man's guilt(or a threat) because he is a man and you are a woman. This is basic…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 03:59 PM
5

It is and it isn't. Gender Dysphoria is, first and foremost, a mental health issue that affects both genders(in that sense, not really a men's rights issue) but, realistically, you also can't really ignore the possibility that a lot of boys develop gender dysphoria as a result of the way boys are treated compared to girls(which is to say, rather poorly with boys generally facing greater levels of physical/psychological abuse, social/sexual isolation and vilification and gender specific expectati…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 02:44 PM
1

lol, the rationalizations. As if the way women who think this way don't hurt men in any way(pretty sure their prejudices extend far beyond just "walking across the street", not that this isn't a pretty shitty thing to do in the first place). An of-course, when the same twisted logic applies to refugees, it automatically means they just die(as if there wasn't any kind of middle ground that couldn't be applied to men the exact same way).
/r/MensRights22/09/16 06:19 PM
3

So, basically "I wouldn't want my daughters to be drafted because I actually care about my daughter's options and wellbeing".
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:08 PM
11

"if there's twenty men and one woman, then it's a known fact that men will favour other men" No, that's not how men think, and she is literally projecting her own sexist ideology and practices onto men. If a man gets hired in that situation, it's because in those twenty men at least one of them was a better candidate than that one woman. That's not sexism, that's just probability.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:06 PM
245

What's funny too is how common it is for people to say shit like "girls are more mature than boys", "girls are more intelligent than boys" or "girls want to have sex just as much as boys" whenever it's convenient for them but then completely change their tune when it comes to this.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 01:36 PM
40

It's pretty ironic how not only is this still a thing and completely legal but actually something that is enforced by the government. This is literally a form of discrimination and systematic disadvantage, but it is women who are considered to be systematically disadvantaged somehow.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 06:54 PM
5

“So, you and I cannot be equal. You have already conquered far more to be in this field than I will ever face.” Your average nerdy guy in STEM has probably faced far more bullying(including multiple assaults), ridicule, body shaming, discrimination, sexism, demonization, social isolation and rejection than 99% of women, in or out of STEM, has ever faced. But, you know, women have it harder because at some point in college maybe someone made a sexist joke around one of them.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:39 PM
1

People give you toys that are more likely to be educational, to develop a range of skills, and to let you imagine a range of career possibilities – while toys considered “girls’ toys” are often limited to beauty, housework and childcare. Arguably, if this is even true, this is literally parents conditioning their sons for responsibility, and already imposing on them the eventual role of a provider. That's not really a privilege. There's certainly a lot of toys out there that aren't really constr…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:30 PM
1

That's a part of the problem too. A good majority of women, in or out of tech fields, still mostly take male attention for granted or grow up with this notion that men should be the ones to approach them in all cases because "it's a man's job" or because they just see themselves as having a higher inherent social value because they are women, therefore it is up to men to make it worth her time. They are basically coming into a male dominated field with a dating market mentality(which is severely…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:16 PM
7

Maybe the solution isn't to tell women to wear more modest clothing OR to tell boys that they should be ashamed for thinking sexual thoughts about women. Maybe the solution is just to NOT have a really negative and demonizing view of male heterosexuality, and to NOT shame and antagonize boys/men for having sexual thoughts towards women regardless of what they are wearing? It's pretty dumb to tell women to change what they wear and it's even more fucked up to tell boys that they are "objectifying…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 06:37 PM
12

I've seen women leave the industry about twice as often as men and the biggest problem is that they don't get into the male networks. It's not like they don't have the same opportunities to do so though, they just choose not to. Women in the industry generally have that same aversion to men in the industry as other women outside the industry would. More often than not, when those women see nerdy, meek or introverted men, they treat them the same way every other women do. They see men who are wor…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 06:31 PM
5

Yes, because it's men who are telling other men not to cry. Never mind all the countless male communities, support groups, memes, subreddits, circle of friends who support each other, only to find themselves constantly berated, ridiculed and belittled by women calling them unattractive, unmasculine and illegitimate and feminist groups calling them cry-babies, man-children and to shut up because they are "privileged".
/r/MensRights14/09/16 01:36 PM
1

There is a benefit to punishing people who commit a crime. The people who are victimized also have a vested interest in seeing those who have hurt them being brought to justice. Imprisoning someone who falsely accused a man also insures that they cannot falsely accuse other men, which is an objective benefit to society. Prison sentences are not a form of neutralization(eventually they get out and can still do it again) but rather a deterrent to the criminal and others(who don't want to go to jai…
/r/MensRights12/09/16 05:12 PM
1

Punishing people who make false accusation isn't hurting people for the sake of revenge, just like punishing rapists isn't hurting people for the sake of revenge. A crime is a crime, and laws are there for reasons other than revenge.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 04:54 PM
1

You realize false accusations destroy lives, right? Like, a man being falsely accused of anything even remotely hostile to women(meaning not just rape/abuse/murder but also anything like stalking or harassing, which are even harder to disprove) could lose close friends, contact with his family, lose his job, even find himself a victim of violent vigilante retribution and police/legal action. That's not even going into the emotional/psychological trauma that such a man would suffer from being sla…
/r/MensRights12/09/16 03:53 PM
1

Cultural and social constructs of what is acceptable and unacceptable can and are enforced by both peers and law. Equal responsibility would enforce itself if it was the norm.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 03:41 PM
6

Accuses him of being privileged because he is a man... after spitting in his face without the slightest hint of shame or remorse(literally no personal accountability), without fear of retribution and with the protection/collaboration of all her peers because she is a woman. Funny how she can imply that women are oppressed, while also being the loudest person in the room.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 02:17 PM
1

But guys, "fake feminists™" like this are just a minority! Never mind that everyone in that video literally did nothing to stand up against her, and actually enabled her actions and validated her opinions. Clearly feminism is about equality even when you have people telling this guy that "he fucked up" and that he should apologize and be sorry for acknowledging violence against men.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 02:13 PM
16

People are pointing out the blatant hypocrisy of feminists basically body shaming this guy but the hypocrisy goes a lot deeper than that. You can also see a lot of these feminists berate and delegitimize this guy for essentially being unmasculine, too meek looking or too soft looking, which literally destroys any premise that feminism might have stood on to begin with. It shows that they are just as much a part of the problems they claim to be fighting. It shows that they are willing to judge me…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:11 PM
1

If you would ever expect anything less from feminists, you haven't been paying attention.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:21 PM
8

"X is setting feminism back by Y years" is really overused... and feminism was never really that great to begin with.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:18 PM
4

That "Men are privileged because they don't have to worry about men trying to talk to them at night" argument really gets tiresome. Like, not only is it absolutely delusion if the worst thing you have to worry about is a man trying to talk to you at night or if you think men don't have worse shit to worry about(usually, when men walk alone at night, they are worried they are about to get fucking mugged, beaten or murdered, and then have people tell him it's his fault for being mugged or beaten b…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:38 PM
49

Funny for all this feminist talk about "gendered" insults, body positivity and oppressing gender roles/expectations(like that one about dick size being a measure of worth and masculinity), just goes to show how hypocritical they are.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 08:21 PM
0

None of these pictures are showing men using force. None of the guns are drawn. Nothing about their body language indicates threat or aggression.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 04:08 PM
1

That's amazing.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 04:04 PM
0

First of all, not all women are the same size, just as not all men are the same size. So saying things like "women are weaker" is really pointless, because it really doesn't matter. If you want to look at the case of a small woman, then look at it as a case of a small person that would essentially have all the same struggles as a smaller man. But, even then, one of the things that you realize when you practice martial arts is that size doesn't really matter unless you're in a regulated competiti…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:48 PM
1

lenty of women with advanced skills in karate have been raped because they wisely chose not to resist, or because they froze. 99% of "karate" is not really martial arts. People should not be taking "Karate" to learn how to fight or defend themselves, especially the places that simply practice meaningless kata's over and over again, and then give you belts for doing so. These are little more than glorified dancing lessons, and should be avoided altogether. "Karate" has no real life applications. …
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:43 PM
1

But that's the thing, I don't think either of those things are really innate. I think these are just behaviours boys and girls learn to emulate through their peers and social conditioning. Girls develop this bias against men because no one really corrects them when they see misandry(partially because men are taught to accept, embrace and protect women no matter how awful they might act), and men have this disposition reinforced because if they don't they will be shunned and further demonized by …
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:15 PM
4

Yes! No matter if a woman is strong or weak, people assume she is weak, and give her benefits based on this idea. Not sure about that. I think people who see large and muscular women understand that she is strong but will treat them as a privileged class none-the-less simply because she is a woman, not because they assume her to be weak when she visibly isn't. They will see her as valuable and worthy of protection, despite her strength, because she is a woman. If a strong woman is visibly overpo…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 06:38 PM
7

I feel that the idea of 'women being abused is worse' stems from the long lasting idea that women are still the weaker sex. I don't think that's true, because a strong woman would still benefit from the same empathy, a weak man would still be victim to the same ridicule and a boy who is distinctively weaker than a grown woman would still be expected to "take it like a man". We protect women because we consider women more valuable and because, culturally speaking, we only consider women worthy of…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 04:33 PM
3

It literally is just basic economics. You have supply and demand being a factor, you have cost of goods being a factor and you have specialty goods being a factor. All of which combined, if anything, just show how women are, as a group, a more privileged class which are able and willing to spend more money on specialty items. If you have certain items on the shelf in pink, with a non-pink item next to it, and more women are buying that pink one, then that pink item will increase its price. If wo…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:46 PM
18

The weird thing is how when you have a woman being raped, even when no violence, threats or force of any kind was involved, it is treated as a crime worse than anything that could possibly ever happen. A man could be imprisoned, abused, tortured and mutilated by a woman every day for months, and people's reaction to that would be mild sympathy at best. No doubt, there would be people laughing about it. I just don't understand how there can be such a drastic logical gap between the two. How, as a…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 03:28 PM
3

People get offended when you tell women to take self-defense classes, because in their minds women(and women only) are entitled to live in a crime free world but, really, more women should take self-defense classes not because it would help them defend themselves(and others, not that this is typically an expectation placed on women the way it is placed on women) but because it would just completely negate their victim delusions through self-confidence, experience and the eventual realization tha…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 06:22 PM
1

If a man had done this to a female player in a competitive setting, he would shunned, possibly banned from that event and accused of misogyny(possibly even sexual harassment/assault).
/r/MensRights24/08/16 06:11 PM
1

I don't really think this is a problem of "how boys learn vs how girls learn" but rather a problem of depression(which typically gains a drastic increase around the age boys develop a need to interact with women on a romantic/sexual level) and motivation(a lot of men grow disheartened with the social paradigm of the male provider or see it as a fruitless endeavour without any real romantic prospects). There is also a much higher pressure on men to skip university and pursue "blue collar"/trades …
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:02 PM
1

You realize the creepy PM is predisposed to explicitly shame and vilify men, right? It's easy to pick out bad messages from would-be suitors when you aren't socially expected to make any steps in courtship yourself. If women were expected to pursue men the way men are expected to pursue women, you would see a lot more "creepy" messages from women. A lot of what is or isn't considered "creepy" often falls explicitly and exclusively on the fact that the sender is male too. Messages that would be v…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:21 PM
1

It's not really a problem that men "create". If anything men go on tinder because they see it as a possible solution to the existing problem of loneliness and disposability. Tinder just makes an existing social problem more apparent.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:08 PM
1

This is essentially why feminism is so harmful to begin with. This idea that all of men's problems are men's fault, and all of women's problems are men's fault. The reality is that women are, in fact, just as much a contributor to most social inequalities and expectations imposed on men and women, if not even significantly more so because they get to do so with complete impunity and with considerably more social, sexual and familial power and privilege.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 04:02 PM
7

Two problems with that. First, even if a male reporter had consent to oil down a female athlete on camera, it would still be considered to be inappropriate(especially if he was old/white, or enjoying himself too much with it). Secondly, if there is a major social disparity between how accepting men are towards women touching them, versus how accepting women are with men touching them, then you kind of have to question that as well(generally speaking, there is a negative disposition from women to…
/r/MensRights10/08/16 09:02 PM
5

TwoXC should have never been accepted as a default sub. It's is absolutely and inherently sexist and divisive, and basically just mean to appeal to female chauvinism. Its premise is, quite literally, to alienate and exclude men in order to maintain some kind of female majority or gynocentrism on reddit. That is not healthy or progressive. It would be like having a "low melanin" sub being a default, to "focus on white people and white people's issues". Reddit as a whole should have done a much be…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:20 PM
10

Women don't feel that science is for them because the field of science if predominantly meek, nerdy or generally unmasculine men, which women still overwhelmingly detest and are encouraged, rather than reprehended, to detest. It's why you still see women virgin shaming men(in science especially), it's why you still see girls of all ages shame and vilify nerdy men, it's why you still see countless "just for women/girl clubs" spaces that are meant to exclude or alienate men(reddit is a perfect exa…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:08 PM
1

Chauvinism is defined in the dictionary as "exaggerated or aggressive patriotism", and it is a major problem among women. It's everything for the "you go girl!/girl power!" mentality to the "girls stick together/don't trust men" attitude, to the "boys are dumb/pigs" attitude that you will see in a lot of women. Hilary's campaign is, predominantly, relying on female chauvinism. Many aspects of the justice system are affected by it. Women only gyms and all kinds of male-excluding practices/busines…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 01:23 PM
48

Is this woman supposed to be some kind of expert? Because she seems to be really off in her reasoning as to why men might want to look elsewhere to find partners. It's not about "women getting their rights", it's a lot more about a general culture of misandry and how women just do not value non-traditional men. The fact is, men have fully embraced the working and independent woman, and that have every right men have and then some. The problem is that women still seek out men who can support them…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 01:16 PM
6

I still know plenty of women who feel like they shouldn't have to work, even when their kids are past 10, because they are women and they believe that's how women should be treated. And, realistically, who wouldn't want to just not have to work, ever, and have the freedom to do whatever you want with all expenses paid? There are probably a lot of men out there who would love to experience that kind of life too but that will simply never be an option for them and most probably wouldn't feel right…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 02:02 PM
1

The closest equivalent to this for men would be having to go to the gym to maintain that strength and make use of their difference in physiology. Could you imagine if the vast majority of men, even the ones who don't work out, basically grew up feeling entitled to special treatment from women or just women doing everything for them because "men have to go to the gym so it's only fair"? Realistically though, men are essentially expected to be expendable work mules and soldiers because of their di…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:33 PM
3

And yet, chivalry is literally the epitome of narcissism and entitlement for women, and it is flat out disrespecting and demeaning to men. Every time a woman expects men to do more for her than she would ever do for them, because of gender, she is being sexist and she is flat out telling those men that she is worthy of more attention and care than they are because she is a woman. Even without going into all the ways chivalry might also demean women, how it demeans men is inherently anti-egalitar…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:26 PM
5

Men and women have preferences and that's okay. We're not here to tell people what they should and shouldn't like. If a major amount of men expressed a "preference" for women mutilated at birth, and that "preference" was then used as a justification to cut more women at birth(which then, arguably, also dictates what is the norm and therefore what is "preferable"), then there certainly would be a cause to dictate what people should or shouldn't like. How people judge and perceive certain things o…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 08:24 PM
4

Teenage boys complain about beefy vaginas, and even then it's generally in a light-hearted manner. No man would realistically be utterly disgusted by a "beefy" vagina when coming face to face with one, just because it is "beefy". There's also a bit of a difference between a "beefy vagina" and a normal uncut one. That would technically be more comparable to women making fun of disproportionately small penises or penises with minor/major deformities(like an uncut man with a unusually disproportion…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 06:15 PM
1

This is why we can't have nice things.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 04:12 PM
5

If you had a comedy where three really good looking rich men in a country where FGM is common discussed how disgusting uncut vaginas are, and how to best deal with uncut vaginas, people would lose their collective shits. Hell, never mind the fact that they would be advocating for FGM, but just the fact that they would essentially be trashing or talking negatively about female genitalia(basically heterosexual man talking about vaginas with disdain and repugnance) would be considered to be hateful…
/r/MensRights26/07/16 02:07 PM
2

What bothered me the most about this movie(well, besides the blatant misandry and anti-male rhetorics, or the ridiculously horrid writing) is that it seemed so obvious that this movie was nothing more than a cash-in on an established franchise, while at the same time completely shitting on the original movie. So many things felt forced in order to establish the ghostbusters as "the ghostbusters". It honestly felt like it was something written by someone who did not like or "get" the original gho…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 02:26 PM
37

It's likely to be the same kind of insecure denial and defensiveness you'll often find in men in America who were circumcised, and who will irrationally defend circumcision in men because it was done to them as infants. They can't acknowledge that there is something wrong with circumcision, because then they think that means there's something wrong with them. They don't think anything is wrong with it, because they basically grew up with a mutilated penis being their norm and can't even conceptu…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:44 PM
9

'Charlie's Angels' series: All girl cast of heroes, virtually all men are mumbling idiots. No one cares. Nah, I hated that movie for how incredibly anti-male it was throughout the film. Same with Sucker Punch(though, that one was from the perspective of an insane girl, so arguably justifiable). You can have a female heroes without making men the enemy, or without making them champions of misandry.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:37 PM
66

Stay Puft was a bad guy. Gozer the Gozerian was the bad guy/girl/god. Also, Xuul and Vinz Clortho and a few other ghosts who were still attacking/harassing people. That being said, while the government guy was right to argue how dangerous that station was, he was arguably still wrong to handle it the way he did by shutting it down without really knowing what he was doing. If there's a powerplant in your backyard that might blow up, you don't just go in there and shut it down by pulling a big lev…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:32 PM
2

The rights to confidentiality do, or should, end when there is another party that is directly involved in the matter and whose right to know supersede's confidentiality. There are many precedents to this in and out of the medical field. You would have to literally treat the father as a non-human in order to not consider it applicable to fathers/men, or to consider the "mother's right to confidentiality" a priority over the father's right to protection from paternal fraud.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:28 PM
30

It's funny, because when you have movies or video games that are targeted to everyone, but end up mostly appealing to men, those movies/video games are labelled as misogynistic. When you have movies or video games that are specifically targeted to women and which are sexist as fuck against men, and end up doing poorly because of it, it is also considered to be misogyny.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:01 PM
22

how is it even okay to discredit reviews because they were made by men...
/r/MensRights18/07/16 04:43 PM
0

Believing that you were "assigned" a gender, or that you are living in the body of a different make, because you associate to social stereotypes, is absolutely a mental illness. Identifying with something you're not at that level of obsessive delusion, to the point of self-mutilation, is a mental illness. Treating it as anything less is dangerous, harmful and, in a lot of ways, incredibly offensive(it would be like a white man who genuinely believes he is a black man in a white person's body, be…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 12:21 AM
1

People with gender identity disorders are human, no one has ever disputed this, but that doesn't mean that everyone is okay with enabling, encouraging or celebrating a mental illness either. A man that believes himself to be a woman is a man that has a mental illness, and the men's rights movement applies to him as much as it does any other man when he is subject to discrimination or prejudice for being a man. A woman that believes herself to be a man is a woman with a mental illness, and men's …
/r/MensRights15/07/16 06:48 PM
2

I don't think the "tables are turning" for women. Women have always had their seat at the table, and have always had advantages that men didn't have. The "patriarchy" isn't "crumbling", it was never there to begin with.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 05:19 PM
2

It's so hard being a man with no period!!! Sorry but you're period isn't a trump card that you get to throw around every time it's convenient. We're not in the dark ages, and a monthly mild inconvenience doesn't make you a permanent victim of life that entitles you to reparations.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 03:28 PM
10

That was so infuriating to watch. I have no clue how much of that was actually staged but it was just disgusting. No accountability, pure manipulation and this guy takes all of it from all sides.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 02:29 PM
3

Can't wait for the day where a man liking a woman's picture on social media is considered to be sexual objectification and harassment too(unless you're really good looking, ofcourse).
/r/MensRights14/07/16 02:18 PM
2

First of all, who are you to tell anyone what worth they should objectively have? That is a major cunt move. You don't even know the guy and you feel you are somehow qualified to judge him for every women? Just because he values himself or whatever he has to offer, doesn't mean you get to push him down for it(not to mention that you are essentially belittling this person for what is, overall, pretty sexist reasoning. Judging men on height and a feminine voice would be like judging women based so…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 01:33 AM
2

Why? Really, I would like to know the reasoning here because it really doesn't make sense in any other context(it's only offensive when it's a man doing it to a woman, apparently). Wolf-whistling is, or has historically been used as, an expression of endearment or a compliment. It is literally a man vocalizing his attraction to a woman. At worse, it is a boasting of male-heterosexuality, and really why should there be anything wrong with that? The fact that it invokes such a irrationally hostile…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 07:37 PM
5

Yes...because men loving women is men hating women. Bravo Nottinghamshire. Ironically though, there would have been a point in time in certain places where black people engaging in "uninvited verbal engagements" with white people could have been considered a crime. People look back on that and recognize how racist it really was though.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 02:24 PM
3

Another thing that is also often dismissed is how this "police are all racist and unfair towards black people" narrative might actually be creating a self-fulfilling prophecy. If people are actually telling black youth that police are targeting them because they are black(which isn't really the case) or even radicalizing them with this idea, they are essentially creating a new generation of citizens who are distrustful, disrespectful, hateful and confrontational towards police officers. How many…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 02:11 PM
–

I agree and disagree. Realistically, the entire premise behind black lives matters is that black men are overly targeted by police and end up getting shot or assaulted by police more often. Yet, when you look at the facts, the biggest determining factor here is not ethnicity but rather gender. It is men who are getting targeted, assaulted and shot, for being men. It is black men, white men, brown men, etc. It is essentially a men's rights issue being dismissed and twisted into a racial problem.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 02:03 PM
3

No company pays men more than women because they are men. A company like this would be subject to lawsuits and be considered highly unethical. It just doesn't happen. What does happen, however, is men seeking out higher wages because they have to, because they are expected to provide for women, because they have no safety nets the way women would and because it is part of their identity(or how they derive any sort of social/romantic/sexual value). What does happen, also, is discriminatory practi…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 01:54 PM
0

But you say its different for people convinced by the state of gender relations? I don't get it. They're 'convinced' that being chemically castrated won't be harmful? Magical thinking? For a lot of people, rape could be the most horrifying and traumatic experience they could ever experience. For an especially disturbed person, being raped might be pleasant or fulfilling. People with very different predispositions or ideals will react differently to situations. Nothing magical about that. I'm che…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:24 PM
1

You'd think it would happen to a larger proportion than 0.2% of people. No, because despite the way we treat men, the conditions that would lead to a gender identity disorder are still relatively extreme. Most people don't reach that extreme because gender identity disorders defy reality, because most people end up coping in different ways and because most people recognize that it's a disorder. It's entirely possible that there is a physical aspect that may also make certain individuals suscepti…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:38 PM
2

But feminism is directly founded on treating men badly, male indifference and male vilification. You cannot have feminism without it(past or present). The very premise of feminism is, and has always been, inherently anti-male. It wouldn't be called feminism otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 02:22 PM
1

Whether or not police officers should be allowed to carry lethal firearms, or be allowed to use them in a time of distress, is a completely different matter/argument. This is more a problem of gun culture, or law enforcement ethics, than a problem of discrimination.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:51 PM
1

I'm happy someone finally brought this up. Every single argument BLM makes about black people, not only really just apply to black men but they apply more to men in general than they do to black women. There are not a lot of cases where you will see a black woman severely beaten or shot by police officers, because we just treat women differently. When it happens to men, people are also more likely to ignore or forget, because male lives just don't matter as much to people and because people are …
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:49 PM
1

Stories like this kind of only reaffirm my view that the way we mistreat men(and male sexuality) as a society, the way we worship women(and female sexuality) as a society and the way men are basically lured by female approval/inclusion(a form of power that is often ignored despite how ingrained it is within society) are largely to blame for gender identity disorders developing in boys. Even the concept of "female friendship", which is generally just another word for gynocentrism, female solidari…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:40 PM
126

This is basically just women taking advantage of men's loneliness or goodwill.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 01:22 PM
3

This post is so offensive, in so many ways. You are making so many ignorant remarks and assumptions, and trying very hard to justify a whole lot of shit that isn't right.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/16 03:16 PM
2

Right, because men never get assaulted, mugged or shot at night. You know what's really messed up though? You will see videos of black men getting assaulted by the police and gunned down, and all people think about is racism. You will have videos of white men, brown men, asian men and european men get gunned down, and people will think "they had it coming" or racism(unless they were white of course). Yet how many videos do you really see come out about police brutality/murder against women? Peop…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:50 PM
2

It is frustrating when you see men face constant abuse/harassment online and be expected to just shrug it off, only to then have women basically cry sexism for experiencing a fraction of that abuse/harassment, and then try to make it a women's only issue and paint themselves as victims of men as a gender. It's even more frustrating when you see some women online basically slander and cry wolf in an attempt to vilify men or to justify their pre-existing prejudices towards men(both being forms of …
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:03 PM
17

Not only would they have that "special unicorn" factor but they have that "diversity" factor. If a competent woman showed up for the job at a place that already had dozens of men and virtually no women, employers would give that woman preferential treatment over other potential male candidates because they would essentially be seeking to balance things in the work place(a bit) and because it would explicitly demonstrate that they don't discriminate against women(a company that only hired women w…
/r/MensRights04/07/16 05:38 PM
1

I don't think feminism is really to blame for getting women to be part of the draft(feminism is primarily just gynocentrism and female chauvinism, not really about equality), nor did they ever really intend for principles of equality to move in that direction(historically they have always been against women being forced to fight at all). This was principles of equality taken to their natural next step, despite feminism.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 02:54 PM
1

Yes... women pay more for beers, even though the price is the same and men are still generally expected to buy drinks for women.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 02:49 PM
6

It doesn't matter whether something is true or false-all that matters is whether someone a woman is bothered by it. They don't care what men are hurt or bothered by.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 01:19 PM
2

"alphas", or men who do great with women, still have their issues or "mental illnesses", the only real differences is that their issues are considered to be more acceptable in men. narcissism, chauvinism or overly aggressive tendencies are far worse forms of mental illnesses but they are considered to be more masculine then other tendencies that would otherwise be considered less masculine. women who have depression or who are shy/meek are not nearly as negatively judged for it because they are …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 09:29 PM
4

A long time ago, I considered myself a feminist, because I was taught fairly early on that feminism was about equality and that women were oppressed. The more I grew up, however, the more I realized exactly how privileged and entitled women were, and exactly just how dangerous and destructive women could be against men(especially the vulnerable ones, who would do anything to serve/protect women, if not explicitely because they believe women are oppressed/victims). The more I grew up, the more I …
/r/MensRights15/06/16 03:15 PM
1

Having James Bond be black isn't really bending anything, since he's been portrayed by a lot of different people over the years. Even then, it wouldn't even really be gender bending if they just set out to do something different and make a character that happens to be female. What ghostbusters did was quite deliberate, and they absolutely forced an all-female cast because they wanted an all-female cast. That is gender bending. Having Idris Elba as James Bond would just be casting an awesome acto…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:41 PM
4

You admit that there's a lack of women in the STEM community, so why would you be opposed to a movie that featured women doing cool shit in roles that are normally reserved for men that might get younger girls excited about a life in STEM? Women don't go into STEM fields because of ghostbusters movies, nor is it Hollywood's responsibility to even attempt to "train" little girls into into getting into STEM fields. There are already plenty of strong female characters in scifi, and there will be ma…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:30 PM
5

I would certainly be more interested in this movie if it had a better cast but the fact remains that this movie was produced on an incredibly sexist gimmick. I am perfectly able and willing to ignore how improbable the new premise is, given how few women there actually are within the STEM community, but what I can't really ignore is that this movie's producers went out of their way to make an all female cast for no other reason than to make it an all female cast. I am against this movie not beca…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:20 PM
1

You can't just misappropriate data(assuming it is, in fact, accurate) and call it a fact either.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 05:05 PM
10

This answer is absurd. It has nothing to do with Neoteny. Men liking women without hair is not even a universal trait, nor is it even historically true. Even if there was an inherent preference for hairlessness in women from men, it would still have far more to do with gender dimorphism than neoteny(hairiness is associated with masculinity/men, therefore the lack of hair is associated with femininity/women). Generally, this is more of a cultural preference, and this preference for hairlessness h…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 04:17 PM
5

"for some unknown macho reason men don't talk about their pain" Oh fuck off. You know the reason. Men are told and taught that they are expendable, from a very young age. They are told that their health and lives don't matter, and that they are essentially only here to provide for and protect women. They are told that their health don't matter, or that their pains don't matter, because they are men, and because women are and will always be the social priority. Men will knowingly sacrifice their …
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:50 PM
20

They are both guilty of assault. Both should be in jail.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:43 PM
2

He could have literally done nothing as far as we know, or it could have been circumstances that she took out of proportion entirely. Either way, he literally just fucked his shit up on her word(money) alone.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 10:07 PM
2

Jesus christ, how can women that stupid even attempt to make the argument that they are more evolved than men. The fact that you're the type of person that tries to plan ahead doesn't make you smarter than the guy that doesn't care or that is focused on other shit in his life. It also doesn't make "women" smarter because you do it. There are a lot of men out there who plan ahead for menial shit too. These women are probably the least qualified to be talking about any of these topics, and their a…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:55 PM
4

Seriously, I loved the deadpool movie but, realistically, they played up that "women crushing/hitting a man in the genitals" like three times. They made an entire comedy out of a guy getting shot and mutilated. They made him threaten and beat up a guy at gun point, because some teenage girl wanted him assaulted. It was full of casual violence against men.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:41 PM
23

Next on the news: feminist accuses man of sexism for existing.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:06 PM
5

The rec center in Brooklyn's Williamsburg neighborhood has apparently kept white-only pool hours since the 1940s, but the practice only came to the attention of the wider public when someone complained about it to the city's Commission on Human Rights. Commission spokesman Seth Hoy said it received an anonymous tip "a few months back" that the indoor pool might be violating the city's human rights law, which bans racial discrimination in public accommodations. Hoy said the commission reached out…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 05:25 PM
5

I've been a redditor for a very long time(at least 7 years), and I used to frequent 2XC quite regularly. They are, and have always been, incredibly sexist, misandric and chauvinistic. Before SRS became a thing and 2XC decided to be less "political", you could just go onto 2XC to find that exact same delusional feminism and gynocentric extremism.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 04:09 PM
4

SRS originated from 2XC. Before SRS, 2XC was the "SRS" of reddit. They eventually split in an attempt to keep a lot of the "political" material off the sub. There was, and still is, some major overlap.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 04:05 PM
6

"some women feel uncomfortable going to the gym where there are men" is a really shitty excuse. If there was enough white people who "felt uncomfortable" sharing spaces with black people, that would be considered to be pretty offensive by today's standards. There is absolutely nothing to feel sympathetic about here. Women who have problems with men are the problem, and it doesn't suddenly become okay just because there's enough of them who think that way. If more women start going to the gym by …
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:58 PM
4

Even if you believe that feminism only definition is "someone who believes in social, political and economic equality for women" that is still an incredibly misandric/biased/toxic position to hold because that definition completely relies on this narrative that women are inherently oppressed or considered inferior to men within a society, or that women(exclusively) are disadvantaged socially, politically and economically(despite the fact that they are, in fact, overwhelmingly advantaged socially…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:35 PM
1

There are men who do all of this, and yet are still incels despite their best efforts. You are not offering anything even remotely insightful by your generalizations. Not only that but you are literally just further demonstrating just how much of a disparity there is between what is expected of men and what is expect of women. Women could do none of those things, and yet still find themselves having many opportunities available to them because they are women. Telling men who already work out, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 08:22 PM
1

Looking at women is just fine, as long as you're not ugly or socially awkward. Kind of contradicting your own point there.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 08:00 PM
1

The gym is another mostly male dominated space, where gender apartheids are considered acceptable and even looking at women is considered to be some kind of assault against them. There are incels who work out, and yet still find themselves in the exact same situation. Again, you can't say they aren't trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 07:53 PM
1

Am I an incel in that case? I mean, I'm not even trying. I'm damn near voluntarily celibate. That is a pretty poor assessment of their situation. There's generally a pretty good chance that those guys are into a lot of other things too, and that they also probably signed up for countless dating sites. You can't say that they aren't trying, when they probably are, because they play video games or work in a male dominated field. It's also pretty shitty to judge them because they are really into vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 07:09 PM
1

Same sex relationships are still a minority, by quite a big margin. Those relationships would work on entirely different set of rules, and wouldn't really fall to the same types of gender expectations(if there are two women or two men, nobody expects anything out of either of them because of their gender).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 04:12 PM
1

You think old men are just rolling in it? They aren't. Every time they express any interest in younger women, they are considered nasty dirty old men. Unless they have a shit load of money and are exceptionally healthy, they are still struggling, and even then those men are still expected to make all the moves and make shit happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 04:10 PM
1

Women(as a group) will always have it easier, no matter their age, because they are women and because we live in a society that expects men to be the ones to instigate and be accountable for everything that happens in that relationship(this mentality persists in literally every stage of dating/romance).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 02:56 PM
1

Men have always been attracted to intelligence, it was generally just considered to be secondary to physical attraction. This idea that all men are shallow is a misandric fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 01:59 PM
1

Who is the abuser in this scenario? That's entirely dependent on the person/situation. Some times, it's a few individuals who take it to a whole other level but, generally, it's a collective. If a black man was persecuted for his skin color because he moved into a white neighborhood, and every single person in that neighborhood was directly or indirectly complicit to how that black person was treated in that neighborhood, they are all the "abuser". They don't see it that way because they are sim…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/16 01:20 PM
8

Considering how many people kill themselves over it, you probably shouldn't be so dismissive of what those men experience or have lived through. In many ways, what incels experience(internally or at the hands of others) could certainly be considered forms of emotional/sexual abuse. It certainly damages them. And, given the option, there are probably those who would choose anal rape over being an incel. They are different situations, which different people might react to in different ways, but th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 09:02 PM
1

To me, an incel is someone totally cut off from their sexuality. They are cut off from behaving in sexual ways and expressing their sexual desires. I believe this is true because many incels refuse to see prostitutes, shying away from the expression of sexual activity when it's fully available to them. They shy away because they need some kind of emotional connection with the person they want to be sexual with. The problem with being an incel has never just been about being cut off from sex but …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/16 08:54 PM
3

So, violence against men isn't gendered violence? And they are cool with "non-gendered" violence?
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:35 PM
-1

Even then, if a man is fool enough to propose because she wants it even though he doesn't, well, whose fault is that? A man who refuses to propose will very quickly find himself without any women to propose to. Most women expect marriage as the end-goal, and most women expect the man to make the proposal because he is a man(and if he doesn't do it in some incredibly romantic manner, he's considered to be a chump that isn't worthy of a woman's love or attention). There are certainly levels of exp…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 03:08 AM
3

It annoys me when people address the wage gap but then completely fail to address social pressures and obligations on men to earn more for women. When women work, who do they typically work for? Themselves, and their children. When men work, who do they work for? For the women in their lives, themselves and their children. People are so quick to dismiss this social reality of men being expected to support men, and pay for their way(which typically starts with dating, but that is really just one …
/r/MensRights27/05/16 03:16 PM
0

There's a pretty major distinction between a guy that goes to one particular restaurant over another because he has a crush on a waitress and a guy who stalks a woman with hostile intentions. There's a major distinction between a guy that keeps to himself and respects everyone around him and a man who literally just grabs random women. There's a major difference between a man that secretly desires a woman's attention/interest and a man who literally just demands or takes it by force. It's incred…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:47 PM
2

Maybe he goes there regularly and creeps on her. What exactly is it this person guilty of? If a woman went to a particular restaurant/pub over another, because she thought the bartender was cute, no one would be calling her a creep. You are literally trying to shame and vilify a man for being shy, insecure or lowly, or just for the fact that he might have some kind of attraction or crush towards another women(essentially shaming him for his heterosexuality), because he is a man.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:44 PM
11

Men have to carry themselves with confidence, otherwise they are virtually invisible, easily discarded, viewed as disposable, deemed to be illegitimate by the greater majority of the female population(if not also completely eliminating them from any future gene pool) and/or belittled and berated as being "beta", "weak", "meek" or "unmasculine". Also, fuck this sign and the person who made it. Who are you to call these men "mediocre"? Talk about fucking conceited. And, maybe, a lot of those white…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:44 PM
8

Pretty funny when the SJW extremist is the most homophobic and insecure guy in a crowd full of republicans.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 02:15 PM
4

This guy advocates for feminism because he believes feminism is the answer to unmasculine men being embraced and accepted by society but the reality is, feminsim will never accomplish anything on that front because it simply does not want to. Feminism is inherently and explicitly gynocentric, and really doesn't give a fuck about accepting men or eliminating gender roles that hurt men. Feminism has historically perpetuated far more of those gender roles against men, because they are essentially w…
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:28 PM
1

I think some men can love unconditionally, meaning that once they fall in love with someone, virtually nothing will ever really lead to them falling out of love with that person. They will continue to love that person, and have no condition for that love. It's very rare in women but seems more common among men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/16 07:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter