TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Frank_N_Berry Archive

View 86 posts and 349 comments by Frank_N_Berry on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
945

DiscriminationFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:42 PM
878

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights19/07/13 12:09 PM
221

Anti-MRMFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights23/12/18 07:13 PM
195

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:27 PM
154

Edu./Occu.Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights07/02/19 02:18 PM
152

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:39 PM
145

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights12/01/18 08:18 PM
139

DiscriminationFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:32 PM
103

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:56 PM
90

Activism/SupportFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights13/04/16 01:38 AM
86

FeminismFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:16 PM
84

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:01 PM
76

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights25/11/14 11:13 PM
76

DiscriminationFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights01/02/19 06:19 PM
75

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:14 AM
73

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:12 PM
67

GeneralFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:09 AM
62

IntactivismFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights19/03/18 06:12 PM
61

Legal RightsFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights23/01/17 10:38 PM
50

DiscriminationFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:03 PM
49

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:03 PM
49

Marriage/ChildrenFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:33 PM
48

Activism/SupportFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:58 PM
45

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights02/09/13 12:26 PM
41

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:51 AM
41

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights25/09/16 04:51 PM
39

Legal RightsFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:42 PM
38

DiscriminationFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights24/05/18 12:42 AM
37

Marriage/ChildrenFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:53 PM
36

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:24 PM
36

Edu./Occu.Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights25/12/17 11:09 PM
36

Activism/SupportFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:32 PM
33

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:39 AM
31

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights20/06/18 02:09 PM
29

Edu./Occu.Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights16/03/18 01:11 AM
29

Anti-MRMFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:13 PM
27

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:09 PM
24

ProgressFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights01/01/15 02:26 PM
23

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:29 PM
23

Legal RightsFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights17/12/18 07:29 PM
22

FeminismFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:43 PM
22

NewsFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:58 AM
19

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:07 PM
19

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:04 PM
18

GeneralFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights02/02/19 05:37 PM
18

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:30 PM
17

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:37 AM
17

Marriage/ChildrenFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:08 PM
16

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:54 AM
16

OpinionFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:22 AM
15

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights23/01/17 11:30 PM
14

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:10 PM
14

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights04/04/17 05:23 PM
12

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights30/04/16 02:59 PM
12

Marriage/ChildrenFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:22 PM
11

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights26/01/19 12:04 AM
11

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:04 PM
11

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:29 PM
11

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:35 PM
11

OpinionFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights27/12/14 07:45 PM
10

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:02 AM
10

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights27/12/15 08:45 PM
10

NewsFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights07/01/15 03:45 PM
10

DiscriminationFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights12/07/14 08:36 PM
8

FeminismFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:18 PM
8

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights12/10/13 10:26 PM
7

GeneralFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights06/11/17 02:27 AM
6

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights30/05/18 07:53 PM
6

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:06 PM
6

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights22/09/14 01:44 PM
6

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:58 PM
5

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:36 PM
5

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights07/01/15 02:43 PM
4

Social IssuesFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights17/08/15 01:07 AM
4

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:08 PM
4

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:41 PM
3

DiscussionFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:41 PM
3

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:04 PM
3

HumourFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:07 PM
3

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights29/01/17 02:35 AM
2

NewsFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights05/11/14 04:27 PM
2

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:24 PM
2

Activism/SupportFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:27 PM
1

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:46 PM
1

Frank_N_Berry/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:37 PM
0

Blogs/VideoFrank_N_Berry/r/MensRights07/12/14 02:11 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Use the womens washroom, say you identify as a woman. Or piss all over the place in the all gender washroom/dont flush.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:30 PM
1

Oh ffs its satire.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 03:44 PM
1

I think the people downvoting the article haven't read it. The headline is tongue-in-cheek.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 12:36 AM
1

Seriously, thank you. I had no idea. https://www.harrys.com/en/ca/social-mission. Fuck Harrys.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:17 PM
2

Oh fuck off with your (((reason))). That shit has no place here.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 09:11 PM
2

Stuff like this does not help our cause.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 01:14 PM
1

But after 50 years, opportunity alone has not been enough to eliminate the gender earnings gap. Why? Because the biggest obstacle to closing persistent pay gaps is the fact women make their own decisions about how much to work, their preferred jobs and the amount of time they spend with their young children. And should we really consider gaps that arise in these ways to be problems in need of fixing? Tucked away at the bottom of the article.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 03:15 PM
2

I agree with some of what he says, and I appreciate that he refers to woman as a class and not as individuals, but we need to stop shitting on women as a group. They make up half the population and no group that large is a single entity unto itself. We really we need to keep our focus on what matters: equality for men and boys in all of bullet points on the stand next to him.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:04 PM
8

Seriously, it's shit like this that gets screencapped and used against us. Stop.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:23 PM
1

I'm interested (and thank you for posting here), but too lazy to put together an air-tight case myself. Is someone interested in putting together form letters, or at least specific talking points together?
/r/MensRights12/08/18 08:53 PM
1

I agree with you. I was referring to the current zeitgeist in the US, not making a moral judgement about divorce vs. asylum seekers. They can both be wrong.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 05:31 PM
1

If this were all it took to give a movement a bad name, feminism would be held in the same regard as Nazi's. Feminism is mainstream. Men's Rights is fringe. They can get away with a lot more because of it. We can't. it would be appropriate to care about men as well. Maybe if this comic had touched on that, I would have held my tongue. It did not. This comic is ugly and it doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:58 PM
1

Honestly, it's posting shit like this that gives /r/mensrights a bad name.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 04:45 PM
12

Peterson's schtick was that you shouldn't be compelled by law to call anyone anything. AFAIK, he would respect a MtF transgender's request to be called 'she' (to the best of his ability), but having a law that compels his speech, forcing him to do so, is where he draws the line.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:59 PM
1

People with a background in activism: Can you offer insights into how the process works, where to find out about public consultations, how to get in front of your MP, etc?
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:49 PM
2

Yes, it's been posted before. I think a week or two ago.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:24 AM
5

If you're wondering why this isn't being upvoted more, it's because it has been posted several times already.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 03:22 AM
2

Wow... Citing anonymous website commenters and Twitter feeds as if they're authoritative sources. The Star is getting trashier than the Sun.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 05:16 PM
2

This is one of the most constructive threads I've seen in this sub in a long time. Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:55 PM
4

In fairness, I see stuff on reddit where you could even say they're using /r/MensRights talking points. And in the most unlikely of subreddits in some cases. [1][2] Edit: missing word Edit2: Crap. I got source 1 wrong.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:47 PM
1

We could post the results here instead. And post the results there. Then post the results here about what happened there. So much fun to be had.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:15 PM
1

We should do a little reddit experiment. Post the same thing with the sexes reversed a week apart and see what happens.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 09:03 PM
1

This is exactly why the Liberals will lose this election with an absolute THUD.... At least it's a big part of why.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:09 AM
1

Do you honestly think comment sections sway that many people? How many times have you read a comment that didn't confirm your bias and have your mind changed? I'm not saying that they'll never stop and not being defeatist at all. I'm saying that we carry our message (yes, in comment sections too) calmly and openly wherever we can in a way that is above the hateful rhetoric. Hate never wins in the long run. In terms of the people who are doing it now -- they're not going stop until social attitud…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:40 PM
1

They're not going to stop. They know exactly what they're doing and who they're antagonizing. The only thing we can do is rise above it.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:19 PM
6

Why isn't this in any MSM? Are the doors actually open and if so has the first client been seen?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 11:36 PM
1

What does this have to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:27 PM
4

Mansplainer! How dare you.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 03:21 PM
1

I'll start. I think his attacking Marxism and post-modernism is a stroke of genius. It gets away from the gender wars and oppression olympics and focuses on the ideology that's causing all of the problems. It's also handy to use it the way he does, by pointing out that tens of millions of people have died under tyrants who used/shared this ideology.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:37 PM
5

Glad you're contacting companies with your concerns. I'm not crazy about the tone of your letters -- I suspect that it could be counter productive or have you written off as a 'kook'. Contrast with: Dear Board of Directors, I've always enjoyed going to Shoppers Drug Mart for x,y,z. As a company, I often see outreach and charitable drives from you -- kudos for that. I am concerned with the one-sidedness of your campaigns, specifically as it relates to women and men. All of your campaigns are targ…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:51 PM
1

"egalitarian" and "making use" ... But I get where you're going with this. I think the most effective strategy would be to take some women's studies courses to learn and use their strategies. We also need leadership.... badly.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 05:16 PM
1

/r/mensrights mods , please change this to a np. link.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:48 PM
1

Has anyone (OP?) considered contacting Shoppers Drug Mart to see what their response is? Radical, I know.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 05:11 PM
1

What does the petition say?* don't feel like pretending to be a limey online to find out
/r/MensRights31/12/17 12:14 AM
4

Do you anticipate violent or semi violent opposition to this? (something along the lines of Warren Farrells' visit to U of T, perhaps)
/r/MensRights27/12/17 10:33 PM
1

There is much more to this than the title suggests. Worth a watch beginning to end, IMO.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 11:11 PM
3

Volunteer at Canadian Centre for Equality
/r/MensRights25/12/17 01:32 PM
5

I find it interesting that r/Canada is having a more spirited discussion on this than we are getting here. https://np.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/7lniz0/pay_raise_for_women_at_wilfrid_laurier_creates/
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:31 AM
1

What's pathetic is that all we do is bitch and moan on Reddit about it. I'm including myself.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 02:37 AM
1

We should create and distribute a pamphlet: How to safely talk to female colleagues in the #MeToo era.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 02:01 AM

fwiw, I contacted them via their website. Got a prompt response saying that all locations in Ontario offer a mens, womens, and family washroom.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:37 PM

If you say "I'm a Men's Rights activist" to Trump, he'll laugh at you and call you a loser. Pretty sure if you said the same to Clinton she wouldn't have much good to say to you, in fairness.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 03:03 PM
3

The way this looks to me, if you're a man with kids, you take them into the family room. I don't see the issue here.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:15 AM

I'm with /u/bufedad. This seems like a non-issue to me.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:14 AM
11

Congrats CAFE. Game changer indeed.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:55 AM
4

The language in the subject line isn't necessary to get the point across.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:56 PM
4

Sorry to hear about your predicament. Find some side work for cash is the best advice I can offer. And that might not be good advice if you get found out.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 11:05 PM

"Cunts gone crazy" in the subject isn't necessary to communicate the point. Honestly.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 06:08 PM
4

So, that's my story. What's yours? I'm an MRA because I believe in equality for all. No back story - plain and simple.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:14 PM
1

Link isn't working for me. Anyone imgur it?
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:25 PM
-3

I get it, just sayin' that if there's one thing feminism got right it's that it's not just women who are making these laws. This isn't about men vs. women. It's about human rights and equality.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 10:23 PM

I was never a huge follower of MGTOW, but reading through their forums (which appear to have reached critical mass), there's an awful lot of bitterness and anti-female stuff in there -- at least in my opinion. One of the best things about men's rights, in my opinion, has been that we've always been inclusive and respectful. We've always taken the high road and I hope it stays that way. It's too easy to fall down the rabbit hole as a group, and ultimately it will destroy our movement. While I rec…
/r/MensRights27/12/15 09:53 PM

This might feel good, but it'll get OP nowhere and expensive. Defamation suits are not easy to prove. Justice, in this case, is living a happy life.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:24 PM

Why is this fight so important to you?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:21 PM
5

Make a list of calm, sensible responses. Don't try to show that your accuser is crazy. Take the high road at all times, keep your head high. If people detach from you (and they will), be prepared with a gracious response that keeps the door open for them to return. Write down every eventuality you can anticipate, write down your responses, then sleep on it and review. Stay away from others until you're happy with what you've got, then walk into it with confidence and determination. Be unambiguou…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:12 AM
7

I don't know the laws where you live, but bankruptcy may be worth looking into. Where I live it wouldn't relieve the child support, but would relieve the medical and credit card bills. Check with a lawyer.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 02:00 AM
1

Maybe it's because people value girls more and are willing to spend more on gifts for girls. Maybe women value spending more on themselves and men value spending more on women. ... those would be the arguments if the "gap" were the other way around.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 12:03 AM
3

For OP's own good, don't ask him anything. He's in an emotional state and a dangerous place. The best way to be supportive is not to tease information out of him that could be used against him.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 01:31 PM
2

Don't answer OP. For your own good, STFU and only talk to your lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 01:29 PM
-2

Yes, it's unreasonable. Your gripe isn't with women, it's with social systems and institutions. Here's an extreme example: imagine you were a gay man during Nazi Germany. You wouldn't stop having sex with men. You'd be careful and smart about when and with whom you did it.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 11:30 PM

Vague question. Are you asking my reason why it could be interpreted in a negative light, or my reason why it has no place here? Negative light: "berg" is a common part of Jewish names. His comment could be interpreted as anti-Semitic No place here: This subreddit is about Men's Rights; it has nothing to do with religion. Admittedly there can be overlap from time to time (circumcision in the case of Judaism). That is not the case here. HTH.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:30 AM

There's a difference between "policing" speech, and being clear with what you say. If he did not intend it to have that meaning, there is nothing wrong with pointing out that it could be interpreted as such. If he did intend that, it has no place here.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:12 AM
40

Where I live, the "diverse campus" argument was used many years ago to cap the number of Jews studying medicine and law. Thankfully that policy is no more. This is no different ("men are taking up too many spots/Jews are taking up too many spots") The purpose of a university is to educate people. It's not to pick and choose who they educate based on the colour of their skin or what they have between their legs. I would say that also to the Asians you mention that are being discriminated against.…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:03 AM
3

Do everything you can to establish yourself as the primary caregiver. (look up local law/case law on how this determination is made) If your child is in daycare, be there for EVERY drop off and pick up. Go to EVERY dentist/doctor appointment with your kid and book every one of them. Don't let her take the kid by herself, even though she's not working. Be as involved as you can when other people are watching/witnessing Feed, bathe, wake up, tuck in, and dress your child every single day. Especial…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:58 PM
1

I don't know where you are, but therapist sessions can be used in court where I am unless it's a bona fide doctor you're talking to. Most therapists will disclose that their documents can be subpoenaed at the start of a relationship. Many therapists (social workers in particular) have a very specific outlook. What they say and what they document may not be what you think.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:52 PM
3

I would absolutely seek legal counsel before taking this type of action. With no offence intended to /u/v8beetle, do not take legal advice on reddit. Get ideas from reddit, write them down, organize them, then go to a lawyer and get your answers as quickly as humanly possible so you don't run up bills. But don't take legal advice on reddit.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:49 PM
1

Not a bad idea. Most likely it'll amplify her behaviours. But it may not be admissible. This is a question for a lawyer, not for reddit.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:47 PM
0

I was giving some genuine thought to this. I think there are a few ways it could be approached: Good old fashioned advocacy. Feet on the ground type of stuff. I don't know that it's going to be an easy -- someone would have to be a very adept advocate/PR person to handle this Equity provisions in policy and law. I don't have the background to really comment on this much, but I suspect that they both exist and could be used. Someone who's in the know could parse it out and work through appropriat…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:38 PM

Nonsense.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:28 PM

Human being here. Picking people for educational opportunities based solely on their sex is wrong. If they cannot be "ranked" as you say, then the proportion of the accepted unrankables should be the same as the applicants. On the outside it looks bigoted because that factor is HUGE.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:26 PM
3

I wonder if their advisor Sandra Bergeron is related to Harrison Bergeron. The irony.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 11:24 PM

You may just be commenting on the similarity in the last names, it could also be inferred that your comment has to do with their religion. Please be mindful that while that may not have been what you intended, it gives fodder to those who like to brand all of us in a negative light.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 12:50 PM
1

Walter Fox is a Canadian lawyer who has appeared on several TV shows and, I believe, before parliament (?) advocating on behalf of fathers. Again, not an endorsement, but a potential resource.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 07:16 PM
1

OP: If you can't afford a lawyer, you may want to talk to these guys... They have meetings at a church on the Danforth. http://www.fathers-resources.com/Meetings/TorontoMeetings/tabid/493/Default.aspx I have no idea if these guys are "good" and I can't "vouch" for them in any way. You'll have to use your own judgement.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:13 PM
2

Because he'll lose out on any chance, no matter how remote, of getting shared custody.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:11 PM
1

Yes, you're right, but I don't see how it can be avoided. Asking for and receiving legal advice on Reddit is begging for more heartache down the road. I wonder what the mods would think of inviting a lawyer or two to either do an AMA or offer some boilerplate "sidebar" advice. These questions come up a lot. I'm sure that there are MR lawyers who would be happy to share some information in exchange for the publicity that it offers their practice. Ping /u/sillymod, /u/nicemod
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:08 PM

Don't take legal advice on Reddit. With that said, you're probably married, but you don't know it. Look up common law marriage in Ontario. As for child support, there are tables. With your income, you may have an income imputed, and part of that may be the shelter her parents are currently giving you or that your parents will give you after you're kicked out. BUT DO NOT LISTEN TO ME. Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:49 AM

What "fair" doesn't matter. Check local laws. If you're in Canada, for example, there are child support guidelines (which aren't guidelines at all, but rather minimums in practice). http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/fl-df/child-enfant/look-rech.asp Probably something similar in your jurisdiction, or case law that you can look up.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:45 PM
1

It's a girl's hockey association in a City of Toronto arena. http://leasidehockey.com There are boys' dressing rooms there.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:39 PM

"Leaside also has a policy forbidding men in dressing rooms after a certain age, unless they are on the coaching staff." I'm curious if this policy also forbids women in boys' dressing rooms. Anyone know what Leaside's policy specifically says here?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:24 PM

OK. There's no perfect victim. Fine. So let's hear a solution. This guy went through a trial that uses all of the standards feminists have been clamouring for. He was vindicated. There's no perfect justice system either. Other than a blanket "if someone accuses it's rape, full stop" (I don't think even feminists would say that, except the most radical) what's the solution that balances the alleged victim and the accused?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:13 PM
2

For those wondering what The Open Letter is: http://np.reddit.com/r/blackladies/comments/2m9k6p/maybe_its_time_to_repost_the_open_letter_reddit/cm27j8j
/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:51 AM
1

I don't know because I am not American. I doubt that insurance companies would consider the father a 'patient', though, and for that they would need to draw his blood.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:15 PM
1

that is a risk I'm willing to take Don't be too bold. :). We need more people like you in legislatures, and more to the point, we need it to be politically palatable for other people who agree with you. If you get booted and lambasted over this, that will just chill dialogue. I have no doubt that there are countless legislators out there who agree but are not willing to die on this cross. Please be careful, and please... Stick around. :) Baby steps: - An acknowledgement that it is in the best in…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:12 PM

No. If that were the case, then if the hospital told the parents about baby formula insurance would have to cover that too.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:47 PM
4

One more thought... The baby's blood type can be an indicator. It is collected at birth already. Perhaps doctors could be compelled to tell a father if the blood type indicates that he may not be the father and to go get a test? As it stands today, doctors do not say anything even when they know. There is a complication, but also a workaround: because of doctor/patient confidentiality, doctors and advocates will argue that this is a breach of the mother's confidentiality. If the mother's blood t…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:34 PM
1

There is probably an existing legal framework for a lot of this that has only been applied to mothers so far. I don't know how it works in NH, but check into what happens when a child is switched at birth in hospital. How does the state/courts handle that, and would it be appropriate to handle it similarly in cases of paternity fraud? Angles could include gender equality and best interests of the child (social, mental, and physical well-being)
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:13 PM

Parents both sign "acknowledgment of parentage": They both say they'll take responsibility for the child and she says that he's the dad Both parents have a set period of time to rescind. This gives the mother a period where she can come clean without consequences (heartbreaking but better for everyone); ensures that the dad has a chance to get a paternity test if he wishes to do so. Bonus points if the hospital is required to tell him how to get a paternity test as a matter of course (best inter…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:50 PM
1

Hmm... Can't find a flair for this.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:23 AM
1

ehatchthey = what they. Know thy mobile typos.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:20 AM

Know that no matter how well researched and cited, you will not likely get a very good grade if you don't toe the line. And you win't change her mind. The research you do should be for you, not anyone else, and not for a good grade.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:14 AM
1

I know it's not your intention but like you said, sometimes there's no right way to say something... and sometimes that means it's better left unsaid. You're right. I'm deleting the post.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 02:11 AM
3

They say in the letter that they want the university to take the evidence and run with it, basically. That they do not want to lodge a formal complaint, they do not agree to restorative justice (which requires their permission), and that they feel that the university has everything that they need to prosecute without them. They also say that they have not seen the Facebook posts. The key takeaway, perhaps is that they're "disallowing" restorative justice (its nature requires everyone to consent …
/r/MensRights07/01/15 11:03 PM
1

I think the President of the Dalhousie is handling it very well, so far, IMO. It's the public and media that's losing its shit.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:59 PM
2

I gave some honest thought to your question. Here's my honest answer: I would think that person was being immature and foolish, and I would find it offensive. I would not perceive it as a as credible threat of rape, in particular because it was not said to my sister or daughter. Distasteful? Sure. A credible threat, absolutely not.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 04:41 PM

There were credible threats of sexual violence. I think that's a bit of a stretch. Give me access to your private communications with your buddies. Let's see what I can dredge up.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 04:08 PM
2

From what I've read so far, the men are not allowed to work in a clinical setting under this suspension but they are still being allowed to continue studies. That strikes a pretty fair balance while an investigation is underway, to me at least.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:45 PM
-1

Where do you get billions from? SoW isn't giving them billions, RBC is saying they generate billions in economic activity.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:36 PM
1

For stuff like that, you can probably find someone in fiverr.com, or oDesk. Fiverr is especially good for infographics if you ever need them made.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:42 AM
1

Oh friendly tip... I'm not looking at the videos at the moment by I saw a few spelling errors. IIRC, "privilege" was spelled priviledge somewhere and utopia was eutopia. Unless of course you were referring to a European utopia of some kind, in which case its fine. ;)
/r/MensRights02/01/15 01:01 AM
1

I'm not saying this is right but the argument is that CS pays for the regular day to day stuff - normal food, shelter and entertainment. S.7 is for "extraordinary" expenses like those I mentioned. The idea is that the kid should still have the sane lifestyle as if the parents had not split, and if they would have gone to camp or private school in a married relationship, they shouldn't be penalized by their parents divorce and denied those things.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 12:57 AM

NAC has gone the way of the dodo. When their government funding wad pulled they swore up and down that they could continue on donations because people believed so much in their good work... Then rapidly vapourized. Judy Rebick is still kicking over at http://rabble.ca but she's become relatively meaningless in the mainstream now. NAWL, OWJN and LEAF are still going strong, with funds being pumped into them by various government programs from Status of Women and the Ontario Women's Directorate, a…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 12:52 AM
1

Hey good to see you here. Great work on the vids! Looks like a lot of effort goes into those -- thanks for your hard work and keep it up.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 12:45 AM
8

I'm on a roll... AND !!! The portion of the section 7 expenses he pays aren't deductible for him but they are for her, even in cases of joint custody, if he sees the child <40% of the time (almost always, because why on Earth would she want to give up all these benefits for a mere 10% of parenting time). She also gets Legal Aid (free lawyer) if she says the two magic words: domestic violence. Sourcerooni
/r/MensRights01/01/15 10:13 PM

Oh and ... The recipient can tax-deduct her legal fees if she wants to increase support (the payor cannot) She can tax-deduct her legal fees to defend against a claim to decrease support (the payor cannot) ... and fees to establish the amount of child support are also tax-deductible for her but not him. Source: http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/E/pub/tp/it99r5-consolid/it99r5-consolid-e.html#P137_16374
/r/MensRights01/01/15 10:06 PM

A few clarifications: The table amount ($8916) that he quotes is for two children in Ontario (1 child is $5400/year, 2 children $8916/yr, 3 children $11,508/yr... and so on). Calculator here He did not add "Section 7 Expenses" to the payor's costs. Section 7 expenses increase the payor's payment dramatically. Without getting into the details too much, stuff like child care, summer camp, after school programs, field trips, and hockey. Every Canadian plays hockey, fact. He quotes and appears to ca…
/r/MensRights01/01/15 09:38 PM
1

I think its time that we agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 02:33 PM
2

No, I do not. I was addressing your argument. half that man's genetic material.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:07 PM
2

If I spit on you, you have some of my genetic material on you. Do I get a say as to whether you can wash it off?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:54 PM
0

Different issues. If paternity fraud forced men to keep fetuses in their wombs for nine months, then you'd have a point. To my knowledge that has never happened. If you want to talk about the need for paper abortion to bring "legal equity" to the biological differences between men and women, that's one thing. But this is not that.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:37 PM
2

It can't be a men's rights issue (in my opinion, others will disagree) because men don't carry children during the time that they are fetuses. They are physically inside of the woman's body. If you want to argue about that, take it up with biology.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:34 PM
1

Say the man want his sperm back You'll meet lots of MRAs who support the idea of a "paper abortion". Why does it have to be all or nothing? Because biology.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:28 PM
1

"her body, her choice" You're talking about two separate points. In this case it's "his body, his lack of choice". MRAs should be discussing (and fighting for) better laws in the rare cases where men are spermjacked. But forcing or denying a women an abortion is a separate issue. TL;DR: Sperm: his body his choice. Fetus: her body her choice.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:26 PM
3

That's cool, this sub is a place where not everyone agrees. That's part of what I like about it.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:24 PM
1

No. In the case of abortion, the mother has not given birth to the baby. The hypothetical dog's mother has already given birth to the puppy. What you appear to be trying to say is that fetus is your daughter or son. It's not, legally, at this time. If you lived in a time or a place where a fetus was legally considered a person, the argument would be different. But you do not live in that time or (presumably) that place. This is not a men's rights issue. It's a pro-life issue.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:22 PM
2

life and death of his child. He should in determining the life and death of his child. Whether you agree with it or not, legally at this time, a fetus is not a child. You are trying to making a pro-life argument in a men's rights sub. MRA != Pro-life. Different movement.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:08 PM
4

"if you get a tattoo, a child will magically die." You're making an argument about pro-life vs. pro-choice, not men's rights. There's a difference, and probably a subreddit for that.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:04 PM
4

You handled it like a champ. Sorry for what happened.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:43 PM
5

It's clear that the author of the article thinks they do. But good luck getting an apology out of UVA.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:26 PM
2

Let's say a woman asks a man if he's willing to conceive a baby and he says Yes. She really wants that baby and the idea of it was incredibly exciting to her. She begins making plans. Then all of the sudden the man, for his own personal reasons, changes his mind. Should she have a right to his sperm?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:22 PM
2

Canada has only two things that are extreme: cold weather and feminism.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:37 PM
1

I can't read that viral women article without hearing Big Red's voice in my head.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:44 PM
1

they're not in the business of biting their tongue and glossing over uncomfortable issues There's a difference between not biting your tongue and shoving your tongue where it should not be. They're a single issue party. They should be picking their issues more carefully. They can intellectualize until the cows come home and back those up with academic sources. Nobody will care unless the message is handled with care. They need to pick their battles wisely which to ky mind they have not done. Ins…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:23 PM
1

Thanks. I don't know how to contact them, but I hope /u/JohnKimble111 will pass it along.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 07:09 PM
1

Break it down for me.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:57 PM
2

Two quotes this reminds me of: Here lies the body of Walker Jay, Who died defending his right of way, He was right, dead right as he walked along, But he's just as dead as if he were wrong. ... and... People won't always remember what you said. They won't always remember what you did. But they will always remember how you made them feel.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:54 PM
2

I disagree with the message, TBH.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:51 PM
1

Throw it in an iframe?
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:48 PM
5

there might be a bit of pushback against the "rise of the radicals" I don't think we have the privilege (intended) be radicals. I also don't think it's necessary. The values of our movement should stand for themselves instead of trying to out-radical the radicals. There's a reason that copywriters write ads and think for days on end what their target market will respond to best instead of just throwing out "Crest toothpaste makes your breath not stink".
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:47 PM
1

Re: #2, how about putting it inside of Wordpress, using a free template to pretty-it-up?
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:44 PM
7

Tone matters. Imagine a cop pulls you over. "Sir, I pulled you over because were speeding. Do you know how fast you were going" vs "WHY THE FUCK WERE YOU DRIVING SO FAST?! DO YOU KNOW HOW DANGEROUS THAT IS? YOU COULD HAVE KILLED SOMEONE OR YOURSELF!"
/r/MensRights25/12/14 05:34 PM

I think this might be better than the way it's behind handled by the university. At least all of the facts will come to light. Right now we're just taking the university's word for it. Even if anonymous doesn't come out with all the details (and from the tone of their "threat", they won't) it will force more details out for public scrutiny, unlike the Star Chamber mentality that's going on right now.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:56 PM
5

Honestly, this platform is awful. I can't even bring myself to read this tripe in full , so I'm scanning it (which is probably what most people who read it will do -- it's 80 pages long). I appreciate that a lot of work went into it. I think it sets us back rather than helps us. It will make us look worse in the public eye, and personally, I'd prefer they didn't run at all than run on this platform. "There are no areas in which the state disadvantages women and girls. " It's true. Doesn't matter…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:46 PM
11

I haven't had a chance to read the document, its 80 pages, but from a quick scan I can say that I wouldn't vote for this party and I'm ab MRA. The abortion stance is toxic. The tone is sour grapes. I agree with some of what they're after, but it comes off as extremist. All in all I think it does more harm than good. Easy target, easy to discredit, easy to mock, easy to marginalize. Will review more when I'm nit on my phone and offer more specific comments.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 01:11 AM
6

Wait...wait... Watch. I can play the games feminists play now. "WHY ARE YOU STARING AT MY CROTCH ON THE SUBWAY?!?!?! MEASURING HOW FAR MY LEGS ARE APART WHILE WE'RE STUCK IN A CONFINED SPACE MAKES ME FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE! YOU ARE A SICKO! SEEK HELP!!!"
/r/MensRights24/12/14 10:03 PM
3

My natural seated position is with my legs partly opened. I'm not going to pretend that I have bowling ball sized testicles, but it's just how I sit and that's how I'm comfortable. Would I bring my knees together to make more space for someone else to sit next to me? Of course I would. I twist and turn too to make room for someone else on the subway when I'm standing. That's just a normla thing to do But when there's room, I don't crunch myself into a tiny little ball to make some random feminis…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:42 PM
12

Personally I'd prefer #QuitCrushingMyBalls.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:05 PM
4

In my experience, these things come in waves. It doesn't mean that the tide has turned; or even that it is turning. It just means that there's temporary attention being paid to it because of recent events that are impossible to paper over. That, of course, doesn't stop them from trying to frame it in a way that benefits them (we saw that clearly with the Jackie/Rolling Stone scandal). Attention spans are short. When the ball drops in 2015, there's a pretty good chance this will all be forgotten.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:02 PM
1

There are egg banks, too. Not sure where I stand personally on certain reproductive technologies in general. It, too, is a sticky wicket. To answer your question, no I don't think it's sexist.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 11:51 PM
10

Sincere question... Why doesn't anyone care? Outside of this subreddit is objection to this a "thing"?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 11:37 PM
3

Why don't you tell me what you came here to talk about. We can have a normal conversation about whatever it is that you want to say. Unless of course you're an antagonist and a troll, in which case you have nothing to talk about and you're just here to stir the pot.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:32 PM
55

You can't vote?! Wow. Anyway, I would have thought they'd already have that info on you without needing to register. My spidey senses say that there some law out there that says you must "volunteer" to do it, and this is how they bring in "volunteers", but I'm totally making that up.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:24 PM
64

Non-American here... What happens if you don't register for the SS (ooh telling and creepy acronym)? Why do you even have to register? Don't they already know?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 10:01 PM
82

Looks to me like they want men to do the right thing and register for domestic violence workshops. Apparently it's quick to register, easy, and the law. :)
/r/MensRights23/12/14 09:58 PM

On one hand... The trolling and pimping is so obvious that it's not even necessary to delete those comments. They make themselves look like total idiots. On the other hand, it does take a few seconds of my life to deciding that they are spouting crap and polluting perfectly intelligent conversation. This isn't censorship. It's moderation. There's a difference. In this case, I think the mods got it right.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 09:14 PM
1

Right... But the question is... Under current law, he'd probably be on the hook for child support. But in this case, under current law, he might not have a right to his kid. So where do you stand on his current status, even though they presumably haven't asked for support?
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:57 PM
2

I hope you're right. Always remember that an organized minority can control a disorganized majority. We need to organize. It's starting.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:49 PM
5

Yeah, they got you covered on that one. First rule of feminist fight club is you don't talk about logic. Third rule is that you don't question. You believe women's experiences. They'll say it with a straight face, too.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:48 PM

To be fair, there are lots of feminists who genuinely believe in gender equality for everyone. They just get shouted down by the nutjobs. But yeah, I moved here for the same reason. It's really quite refreshing.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:46 PM

Fellow feminism refugee here. What you describe has been happening for years. Seems to be getting more extreme over the past year or two, probably the past year especially. I won't suggest that MRM is perfect. There's a fair share of idiots on this side of the fence too. But at least everyone is allowed to speak.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 06:06 PM

In fairness, we wouldn't like it if men were portrayed in a negative stereotypical manner.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:05 PM
5

Is it me or is the term 'rape advocates' a Freudian slip? Surely they're not advocating for rape? Are they...?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 12:03 PM
2

The term 'male violence' irritates me to no end. Violence, period.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 02:30 AM
2

Getting "Tumbler In Action has moved" when I click your first link. Seems to be in a loop
/r/MensRights07/12/14 06:26 PM
7

It does not say it is women only, Yes it does. See OP's original screenshot.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 06:12 PM
3

Damn. Well said, Chris Good. Bravo.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:23 PM

From the article: This disaster is the sole property of editors and a reporter. There's definitely truth to that: Rolling Stone should have done a better job verifying this article, but "Jackie" is not blameless here.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 08:11 PM
1

You were too drunk to immediately notice someone sucking your dick you were pissing out of but sober enough to beat someone to a pulp?
/r/MensRights29/11/14 08:28 PM
53

Well done, #GamerGate.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 03:18 PM
0

I think you missed that I was referring to the comment beneath this comment: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2nkikl/this_was_in_a_subreddit_had_upvotes_in_the/cmeso6l, which has since been deleted. I did not reply to in out of respect for mod's request to not reply to the known troll. Thank you for your contribution.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 03:12 PM
1

Probably because he's used to hearing the voice of radical feminism and thinks we're its corollary.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 07:08 PM

At risk of feeding what I know is a "known troll", would like the mods to respond to rottingchrisq's comment (which will inevitably be deleted)
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:55 PM
1

If you are threatened with rape or any sort of harm and acquiesce, then yes that is rape. That is different from gauging low-enthusiasm (which is where we started this convo) by a country mile in my books. I think we will have to agree to disagree here.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 03:57 AM
1

If my bf said no and then I begged, pleaded, told him I felt unloved, accused him of cheating, etc etc and he gave in finally, despite not wanting to, that would be rape I agree with much of what you say, but I'm going to disagree with you here. There's a difference between duress (threatening for example) and just giving in (come on, it'll be fun). Especially when you're talking about a serious crime like rape. In your example, your boyfriend gave in. Nobody can't expect you, especially in a le…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 07:43 PM
4

Today's lesson: We don't have to make up quotes, or even take them out of context. Their hatred is so obvious that we only have to let people know what they say. Common sense takes care of the rest.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:11 PM
1

If i want to do it, i make it damn clear to my partner. And I think this is where you'll get a lot of disagreement from folks in this forum about the concept of enthusiastic consent. A lot of people don't make it "damn clear". Everyone agrees that no means no, so if "damn clear" includes a "no" or even a "nah" or "not tonight" I think you're good. But if "yes" requires a "HELL YEAH" and and giant exclamation point, you've lost me. First, I can't see an exclamation point, and I don't think most m…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:02 PM
2

Quit it with the downvotes, guys. She's contributing to the discussion in a positive way. Please don't downvote just because you disagree.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:56 PM
6

Honestly... This is not the battle to have. Take your daughter to the appointment, take good care of her while she's healing, and move on. I get that you're frustrated and your ex is being a cunt, but fry bigger fish. You may end up with some great memories of the xmas you spent with your daughter after her tonsils were taken out that you never expected.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 12:40 AM
1

Section 4.1 here: http://www.georgebrown.ca/GBCCA/current_students/registrars_office/academic_policies_(pdf)/prevention_of_discrimination_and_harrassment_policy.aspx You likely will not get anywhere with the ministry, but feel free to try. Human rights tribunal is free, may be worth a shot, but probably will allow it because you are 'not historically discriminated against'. Even so it will be a pain for the school to defend and you have a decent chance of getting press. Barbara Kay (National Pos…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:26 AM
5

They can probably only see how many people were referred from this site, now how they voted. Regardless, perception matters.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:09 PM
10

Suggestion: readers don't click on it, and you shouldn't have linked directly to it. Otherwise when the results come out, we'll be accused of trying to distort the results, even though the results were as they were before you submitted this post.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:40 PM
6

Find help: RAS Syndrome
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:00 PM
12

Enters PIN number into ATM machine
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:16 PM
3

There are tonnes of scholarships for women only: Search for 'women' here http://scholarshipscanada.com/. Of course, it wouldn't be tolerated for an instant if it were the other way around, but these are the times we live in. EDIT: Made tonnes metric so it's even more! Take that.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:01 AM
1

To answer your question, please refer to the first three sentences in my comment above.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:49 PM

Yes, it's wrong. What she was doing was wrong, she should have known and her parents should have stopped her. But there's a difference between a 7yo girl doing something wrong and sexual abuse. I think this fits into the former category. And I am neither white knight nor a feminist.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:40 PM

Not a fan of Lena Dunham, but also not a fan of criminalizing 7 year olds. She was being a curious kid. That doesn't make her a sexual predator. Let's not stoop to becoming reactionary, please. There are plenty of other movements that employ that tactic. We don't need to be one of them.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 03:48 PM
0

This really isn't worth engaging. I posted the link to the collective agreement. The numbers speak for themselves. I do not have (nor do I intend to seek out) attrition rates for teachers, but it would surprise me a great deal if most teachers in the workforce did not have ten years of experience under their belt.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:33 PM
1

Posting to the collective agreement, and giving accurate information in the original post, is dishonest how?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:30 PM
13

Totally because patriarchy, riiiigHT?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:28 PM
1

Here's the teachers' collective agreement. See page 4. The least a teacher makes in his/her 11th year of work is 80K, up to 94K for an A4. This is from 2011, so the salaries are higher today. All of this plus pension, early retirement, maternity top-up... plus plus plus... For 9.5 months of work per year, to boot. To the original point, there are few teachers who have any tenure that earn less than an average IT person on a pro-rated basis.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:36 PM
1

In Canada teachers earn more than $50/hr... 94k/yr for working 9.5months (after 10y experience). +pension.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:48 AM

Ask Warren Farrell how "coming out on the other side" worked for him. Even on the off-chance Gomeshi did change his tune toward men/feminism, it would only hasten his decline: he would be discredited and called a misogynist/rapist/whatever.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 02:40 PM
1

Missed the full context on the first read... youre right and post deleted.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:43 AM
1

You are correct... after reading more context, i have deleted this post.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:39 AM

You are right, TILPolitics. Still, shows the culture of some mods.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:25 AM
1

Well that's a sticky wicket for the CBC... either a rapist on staff or a false rape accusation against one of their own.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:49 AM

Full text for the record: [–]no_game_player 0 points 2 hours ago It needs to be the right information from the right people. Here's a shorthand guide: if you are an MRA or TRP, you need not bother posting. If your information may tend to make women look bad, same. If your information could be construed as political or involving someone who has been involved in politics, no go. If your information is recent or relevant to anything in the world, not allowed. Otherwise, you should be fine! HTH
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:27 AM
2

Excellent post - thank you.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:39 PM
1

Sure. But how do we control that? That's what I'm getting at.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:11 PM
3

MR at RP are two vastly different things. I would hate to see MR hang its hat on RP just to get numbers.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:15 PM
3

An organized minority can control a disorganized majority. Ask 4chan.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:13 PM

You shouldn't be beating the shit out of anyone. Seek help.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:05 PM
1

RP = ?
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:02 PM

Worth noting: If you Google the headline in quotes, nothing comes up.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:24 PM
-4

It wouldn't surprise me if women's tennis was more popular than men's and brought in more revenue. If that's the case, I don't see why women shouldn't be paid the same (or more) than men.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:54 PM

I think OP is playing with fire if he takes this advice. Yes, she raped him. Yes, he should be able to report her for sexual assault. But yes, he's a man. If the police believe him (expect to hear "we don't enough evidence to proceed with a charge") and she gets charged, there's no telling what she'll do. She could just as easily accuse him of rape. Good luck fighting that one while you're going through all this. Pick your battles. Lawyer up. Don't seek legal advice on Reddit or any other social…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:49 PM

Talk to your lawyer before reporting the domestic violence/rape. You have no idea what she'll say or do. The last thing you need at this stage of the game is to be fighting on all fronts. Do nothing. Talk to a lawyer. Gauge reasonableness of advice. Talk to another if necessary. Move forward only then.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:45 PM
2

Good for them working on fixing the problem, but I don't understand why they had to dress a man as a woman. Why not just follow around a woman with a camera to expose this issue?
/r/MensRights06/07/14 01:27 PM
38

Don't get legal advice on reddit. Get a real lawyer and don't yap to anyone anywhere until the lawyer says it's OK to do so.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:33 PM

Ratelimiting is trolling -- look at her past comments. Don't give her ammo to quote you out of context on.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 09:29 PM
12

The author of the article found rape victimhood (specifically victim-blaming) in a photo of Miley Cyrus with no words or expressions to indicate that Cyrus was being sexually assaulted. The exact opposite in fact -- she was "accusing" someone who was sexually attracted to her of being "rapey" in spite of not raping (objectifying in this case). The point of the picture was (a) objectification; and (b) shaming language by calling someone who is sexually attracted "rapey" by virtue of them being at…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:37 PM

They took action by removing it. Removed those words for clarity.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:36 PM
1

Honestly, these are so smack-you-in-the-face bad, I think they doing us more good than harm. Wiki-Vote: Keep :)
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:24 PM
-4

"Dude, I just made up some pedestrian memes that claim one man is totally responsible for another men's behaviour in a made-up situation that would never happen because they share the same bits." "Whoa, man. Those aren't pedestrian memes, they're misandry: the hatred of men and boys." "Good call. We don't want to tolerate this misandrist society anymore. We should totally speak out against it -- you with me?"
/r/MensRights19/06/14 02:13 PM

That they removed it? Look in Google's cache of the site.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:48 AM

Chances are excellent that you'd end up with a feminist if you went to the Leaside Therapy Centre listed on their site. The therapists at Leaside are radical feminists. Looks like Father's Mental Health Network removed Leaside Therapy Centre from their website. For those wondering, here's a list of their "therapists": http://www.leasidetherapycentre.com/therapists/meet-our-therapists/ Kudos FMHN. EDIT: Clarity.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:31 PM

1 Recognition that men have issues that need to be addressed. 2 Either (a) for "equity" standards to be abolished and focus on equality - or - (b) for equity standards to apply to men where appropriate equally 3 For social change that removes the "us" vs. "them" mentality in the gender wars, and let us all work together. We all have moms, dads, brothers, or sisters. It should not be the way it is today.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:30 PM
2

Then those men should go to a different doctor. I recognize that in an ideal world that wouldn't be necessary, but it's not an ideal world and they can still do it. If it's not the law, it's not the law and that's totally different.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:54 PM
1

For him to be allowed to use it? Why would a wife be required to sign a consent form?
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:38 PM

Googled. Could not find source. I strongly doubt this is true. Can you provide a source?
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:03 PM
9

Or "Masuclinities", the new code word for men.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 01:40 PM

We need to stop trying to engage the crazies. I've been hanging out in 2X for the past couple of days. There are women who identify as feminists there, but they're not the type of feminists we're talking about here. They're... normal. Normal women who don't hate men. Who I think for the most part share the same goals that we do. I think we need to find ways to reach out to them. We're not going to change the minds of the man-hating radical feminists, we're just wasting our breath. But if we reac…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 12:44 PM
1

OK. Do it your way. Sounds like a lot of effort and heartache for very little result.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 10:02 PM

I think she's actually kind of right. I will point out, though, that very often, feminists will refer to men as "males", but women as "women", often in the same breath. I don't think that's by accident.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:07 PM
1

I'll take you at your word that you didn't mean it to be anti-Jewish. You are free to disagree with Israeli politics and call it whatever you like. That doesn't change that Zionism has nothing to do with Israel's laws about de-clawing cats. Nothing you said in your post, or the post you referenced, has anything to do with Zionism. Go ahead and call a banana a pickle but it doesn't mean anything to anyone but you.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 07:47 PM
1

I care, quite frankly. The misuse of the word "Zionist" to refer to someone who supports an Israeli law on cat de-clawing law is not only incorrect (it has nothing to do with Zionism) but it's also a tactic that a lot of people who are racist use as a metaphor when spewing anti-Jewish whatevertheywant. Quite frankly, I think we have enough of a PR problem already. MRAs don't need the waters being muddied. I'm sure you didn't mean it that way, of course.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:35 PM
0

I think you're referring to this quote from that thread: "I'm left as shit and don't support declawing cats, and praise Israel for making it a crime. Why the fuck are you dragging politics into this dipshit?" With respect, I don't see that as "getting all defensive and construing it as criticism of Israel". If I'm looking at the wrong quote, please let me know. Otherwise, I think you're using "Zionist" to mean something other than what it means.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:30 PM
2

Your Zionist opponent committed an old logical fallacy How is he "Zionist"? Because he supports Israel's stance that it should be illegal to de-claw cats? I hope you weren't using that word in the way it appears.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:25 PM
19

Notice that they say "the person initiating sex" must meet this standard, but not both parties. In a normal world, I'd be curious how they determine who that person is, but I think we all know how that will play out.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:07 PM

Let them publicize and protest all they want. They're spreading the word and making themselves look bad.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:35 PM
2

Here's the thread for those who are wondering. http://np.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/27frdm/til_you_can_go_to_jail_for_a_year_for_declawing_a/
/r/MensRights06/06/14 12:33 PM
2

Who said this and in what context?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:27 AM
30

What bad grades and a bad family would get him profiled as: a rapist who is dumb and whose father abandoned him before he taught him how to respect women.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:25 AM
2

What Ignatius said. Plus it's very hard to get anyone to care about unwanted pregnancies if it's the man who doesn't want it. Now if you pitch it as protecting women from STDs, that might get traction.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:22 AM
1

As pointed out by another poster, a feminist may be harmed in the making of this commercial: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27epks/i_just_ended_my_relationship_with_my_abusive_and/ci05ofj. I agree with him.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:59 PM
2

Good point, but hard sell. In other news: your subject matter + title = fantastic pun for gay men.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:58 PM
1

Then why a separate account for /r/self?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:45 PM
8

I'm calling bullshit on this post: See: /u/Macallister5[1] /u/Macallister6[2] /u/Macallister7[3] This is a troll.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:00 PM

I'm calling bullshit on this post: See: /u/Macallister5 /u/Macallister6 /u/Macallister7 This is a troll.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:55 PM
3

Those same very mean people would love this sub to get shut down for doxxing.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:48 PM

I don't know that we can confirm this guy's identity, but it would help if he would reply to some of these questions and be part of the conversation that he started.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:45 PM
1

Him identifying "himself" isn't going to do much good unless he's not a troll.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:43 PM
2

I would be happy to. OP, please reach out to me.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:38 PM
2

With respect, I'd like to hear what OP has to say.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:31 PM
2

Me too. Dang, there's a lot of Torontonians on this board.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:03 PM

Why didn't you go to police?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:02 PM
1

On a positive note, this troll didn't pretend he was an MRA and say something heinous and objectionable.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:30 PM
1

If you just do to them what I'm doing to you, you'll win. My point is that you can accomplish what you want by different means and it's much more effective. Keep your eye on the prize. We're on the same team here. I'm trying to teach you something and illustrate it at the same time. Do you see how well this works instead of doing what you originally proposed?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 05:57 PM
1

WARNING: Intercourse with this woman may result in expulsion and/or criminal charges. WARNING: Intercourse with this woman may result accusations of sexual assault. WARNING: Intercourse with this woman may result in unwanted pregnancy. WARNING: 87% of false rape accusations are made by women who consent to sex and regret it in the morning (find a real stat) You get the idea.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:55 AM
1

Good advice. Better advice: ignore it.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:46 AM

I wouldn't get too worked up about it if I were you.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:45 AM
2

Same pic. Cigarette pack style warnings.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:46 AM

Nobody is saying you are a troll. It's that using a zero-day account is the sort of thing a troll would do.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:08 AM

I agree with pretty much everything you've said. One point to add: who else can raise $30,000 in 24 hours for issues that affect men and boys?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:05 AM
2

Well, that all depends. If you define "misogynist" as "hatred of women", then no we are not -- quite the opposite, in fact. But if you define misogyny as "disagreeing with radical feminists on issues, and not cowed by their childish silencing tactics which include calling people who disagree with them 'misogynists'" (which too many people do), then yes, we are. It's all about perspective.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:41 PM
1

I doubt they're under any illusions that this is going to stamp out prostituion, and I don't think they give a crap about the practical effects. All they care about is that they get what they want and craft it in such a way that the Supreme Court can't strike it down. In the end, this is worse for the johns than the prostitutes. Now the prostitutes can rob/extort money from their clients with impunity knowing that if the johns go to police, they'll be charged with engaging in prostitution.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:36 PM
1

I'm not so sure that they'll be successful in striking down this one. This time, it doesn't endanger prostitutes and it would be pretty tough to claim that it does.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:12 PM
1

Because they want it to be illegal (rightly or wrongly), the Supreme Court said it couldn't be illegal in that way (rightly or wrongly), so they found another way to make it illegal (rightly or wrongly).
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:10 PM
1

They also make it illegal for prostitutes to advertise their services. The penalties for prostitutes that advertise are heftier than johns who buy.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:40 PM
3

Not disagreeing with you.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:37 PM

Paul Elam is to men's rights what Radicals are to feminism: a good way to get attention to an important cause, and a lousy messenger. He is a tool, not a spokesman.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:06 PM
1

I'm not responding in a defensive way to your accusations and angry response right now. Who do you think looks more discredited -- me or you?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:00 PM
1

Rather than trying to pin this guy to any ideology, I think he was just a nutbar. To be perfectly honest, I think your hypothesis here is a little nutty too, just not nutty in the same way.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:42 PM
10

Thanking her will have the opposite effect you're hoping for -- she'll realize that she's giving us publicity and stop writing about it. The article is to our benefit. It's her attempt to discredit us and paint us as fools, but really it's just spreading the word that we exist and are under threat. Let's accept the benefit and not point it out. Let's hope that she keeps trying to discredit us more. Leave it alone, don't send thanks, and quietly smile to yourself.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:39 PM
1

Replace the www.reddit... with np.reddit. np=non-participation.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:21 PM

sillymod,it's one thing to remove the link, another to remove the entire post. I hope in the future that you'll consider being more transparent about the removal and let everything but the link stand.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:20 PM

I notice that this is now "[removed]" here too. Was that a MR mod that did it, OP, or someone else? Gotta say, if that's an MR mod, I'm really disappointed.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:11 PM
10

"HE'S A WITCH! HE'S A WITCH!" Times change. People don't.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:10 PM
2

You have a very generous disposition. Hopefully that will help with the bridge-building. I am more cynical of the methods and the motives. Good luck to you and keep us all posted -- on both sides of the discussion.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:00 AM

There is nothing unsafe about posing a question. That is pure deflection. EDIT: Notice that they also removed on the sly it without telling you.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:43 AM
4

Thanks for coming by, Pilot. I think you'll find that almost everyone here agrees with you. Hope you'll stick around and help us build a few bridges.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:39 AM

Many of us have tried just that. Standard-duty feminists aren't the enemy -- they want (mostly) of the same stuff we do. We need more people like you who want to, and can, build bridges. Many of us on "this end" have tried to cross that bridge. We usually find a feminist on the other side striking a match to burn the thing down. If you can make it happen and find a forum that's willing to work together on common goals, reach out to me. I want to be part of that conversation.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:11 AM

Now do you see why your original suggestion doesn't work?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:57 AM

Look at the text at the top of your post. Your message on /r/Feminism is "[removed]". http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/2793g6/posting_this_on_both_rfeminism_and_rmensrights_i/
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:44 AM

29 minutes after post: Already censored by /r/Feminism.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:42 AM
2

@gww, I don't know this as fact, but I'm guessing that it's shitty beef, sans L&A. Have you seen the Making of a McNugget?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:21 PM
10

Well, apparently if a lie is retold often enough it becomes the truth to you. I see that clearly. The rest of us know that McDonald's uses pure beef. http://www.snopes.com/business/market/allbeef.asp
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:41 PM

By responding to it we are: Put on the defensive; and Legitimizing and propagating their claim Does McDonald's have signs in their store that say "We don't use horse meat"? No. They say 100% Pure Beef. Because they don't need to repeat the lies that have been said about them. They expect the truth to stand on its merits.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:17 PM
1

I think it's in our best interest not to make up bogus quotes when feminists, and in particular Big Red, give us so much real fodder to work with.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 07:14 PM
2

Are these things she actually said? Given Big Red's big mouth, I don't think we need to make up quotes for her.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:47 PM

I agree with you, but I think our activism needs to speak for itself. People will associate us with whomever suits their agenda. Today it's be the Red Pill, tomorrow some phony Nazi group they make up and try to stick to us. There's little we can about what they will say. Do the right work for the right people and let your actions speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:45 PM
1

ha! I had not. I didn't even notice the tab that said Wiki on Reddit until now. :)
/r/MensRights02/06/14 10:15 PM
1

sillymod, any thoughts on putting these resources in the sidebar or in a blog somewhere? This seems to be a recurring question. Maybe equalitywiki.ca or something?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 10:00 PM
1

Like the MRM being infected from the inside by feminists that seek to destroy it, just like they're doing with atheism. I agree with you here. I think we need a strategy to protect ourselves from it. Any suggestions? Or the billions of dollars in corporate media being used to distribute hate and propaganda. The liberals influencing college courses indoctrinating student to believe feminist lies before they've ever spent a day in the real world. The President himself being so caught up in the bul…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:57 PM
1

You make a good point. Agreed.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:43 PM
3

I don't speak for anyone but myself. If you want to carry this cross, I won't stop you. From my perspective, there are more important issues right now for men and boys. I look forward to the day when we have addressed those and can get upset over things like this.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:48 PM
6

We have bigger fish to fry than dumb jokes at this stage of the MHRM. I hope one day that we can worry about things as small as this. There are so many other glaring issues that are very serious and have real implications. We need to pick our battles.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:58 PM
56

I'm going to agree and disagree with OP. It's a fair point that you're making It's also a joke I don't think we need to be as humourless as feminists. It gets us nowhere and makes us bitter. Given that it's supposed to be a joke, I'm not all that concerned. Bigger fish to fry.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 03:12 PM
2

I'd also add that I think we should avoid the oppression olympics that feminism has going on. I don't want to get into "who's more oppressed, gay, straight, trans or black people". Everyone has struggles and they don't need to be compared. Let's just shoot for everyone being treated well and call it a day.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:59 PM
3

I can't speak for anyone here but myself. In my view anyone who cares about men's issues is welcome: male, female, GLBTQAlphabetsoup. I think we need more diversity to shore ourselves up against a lot of the classic objections to our existence and to get broad support (pun only intended after-the-fact). I also think we need to reach out more to gay men a lot more than we do today. Many of their struggles fit within MHRM. In terms of trans people, if they're being victimized for presenting as mal…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:53 PM
2

I'm suggesting donations straight to CAFE, not to me. If someone knows how to contact a mod (I don't), please ask them if they'd be interested.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:03 PM
2

Don't know how to do that.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:47 PM
7

Excellent.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:22 PM
11

For those so inclined: [email protected] 416-453-7557 edit: I'm going to echo was SC said: "Don't try to force them into the middle of these politics with rhetoric. Just thank them for trying and express dismay at the unreasonable responses they have received from twitter feminists. Be nice to them." -- Good advice, I think.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:11 PM
11

Anyone think we could collect enough money for CAFE in time to buy a bunch of beer for the attendees to replace these guys? It's happening in two days.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:03 PM
3

It likely won't resonate.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:59 PM
14

A couple of my locals are on their list. http://hogtownbrewers.ca/wheretobuy/ They're small pubs, and I personally know some of the owners. What's the best way to communicate this to them? I suspect if I say "HogTown is anti-MRA" I'll get a blank stare and it won't get very far.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 04:51 PM
15

1) DO NOT MOVE OUT. 2) Talk to a lawyer. 3) Don't get legal advice on Reddit.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:16 PM

We need more articles like this. He doesn't get a single jab in other than "it just ain't so. So there." Coming from a guy whose website is sixpackabs.com, the irony is thick.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:14 PM
3

Our time will come. Probably not in a way that any of us imagine.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 12:47 PM
1

Against it or not has little to do with this. It's legal, but there's an "uproar" because these same privileges that a woman is legally entitled to are being used by a man. To the point that the legislature may act.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:17 PM
1

burnadams has -9308 karma. (note the negative sign). Probably a pretty good indicator.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:28 PM
1

Not correct. This only applies to women, whether or not they actually conceive. Quote fromt he ruling: " or increasing the risk of pregnancy is equally serious"
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:29 PM
-1

"The Creator". Now that's showing respect right there, that is.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 09:42 PM

I'm not trying to minimize, but pick your battles. Men have bigger inequalities to fight, especially in education, than wearing PJs to school. Good for you for doing it, though, and for standing up for yourself.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 12:54 AM
1

All the more reason the name of this discipline currently called males studies should be called men's studies. Frankly, if it were up to me, there wouldn't be any "men's" or "women's" studies. But if there must be women's studies then there ought to be men's, as well.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 03:10 PM
2

Nobody owns the right to the name. As for it causing confusion, which I imagine is your concern -- I don't think it's a well enough entrenched disclipline to matter one way or the other. It's not like we're talking about taking over "chemistry".
/r/MensRights23/12/13 11:49 PM
3

Not trying to be too picky here, but what's with the "Male" instead of "Men's"? Men are human. Male can be of any species.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 10:48 PM
1

It's been a month and a doctor can't tell if she's pregnant? Something wrong with this story.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 01:18 AM
87

I'll give you the best legal advice you can get on Reddit: don't seek legal advice on Reddit.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 01:15 AM
5

Ever notice they say "Man Made Global Warming", but never "Man Made Lake"?
/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:46 PM
1

"Toolbox" is begging for mockery. "Look-see here: the MRAs have a toolbox." "Was that in the MRA toolbox?" Guess who the "tools" are? Just my 2c.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 03:08 AM
1

I'd like to suggest a name for the framework: "Blueprint."
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:34 PM
6

Campus police? Seriously? "Stop! Or I'll say Stop again!"
/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:29 PM
7

CAFE should offer to hire the police directly instead of through the university. He who pays the piper calls the tune.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 08:10 PM
2

OSQA I'd recommend it to ArchangelleDaddy myself, but I don't know how to do it via reddit. :) If you don't mind, please pass along my suggestion, in case he doesn't see it -- I don't use reddit all that often.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:00 PM
3

Check out OSQA. It's more Reddit-like (actually more Stackoverflow-like) You can have it up and running in a matter of minutes and hosting is less than a couple cents per hour on a reserved instance. https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B0062Q7EQ4
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:58 AM
1

Many (though not all) men's washrooms in Toronto have change tables. I'd venture to say probably most men's washrooms do when women's do as well. What irks me the most is city hall, where the women's washroom has one, but not the men's. For a city that prides itself on "diversity" and "equality", Toronto makes some really odd exceptions. You'd think change tables in the men's washroom would be a feminist issue, too.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:13 AM
0

Sexual assault in Canada = almost anything. An attempt at a first kiss is sexual assault in Canada if the woman declares it to be so.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:04 PM
0

A thought: Perhaps it's possible to create a bot that automatically changes "www" to "np"?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:03 PM
5

Not true everywhere. In lots of places, the matrimonial home is "equally" owned regardless of whose name is on the papers.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 08:48 PM
3

Voted this up because it's a fair question if this person or anyone else is not familiar with the original.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:42 PM
1

Don't know about where you live, but where I live the rent free condo would definitely lead to imputed income for the fair market value of the condo rent. As for opening a business, same thing, additional income beyond whats reported would be imputed.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:00 AM
2

Women had rights all along, we didn't 'give' them, they were taken away. Now theyre being taken away from us. Wasn't right then, isn't right now.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:42 AM
5

Do you really think visitation and being involved in this child's life is the appropriate I can't speak for him, but if it were me, I'd want to know my kid. And really there's no other option other than paying child support? Probably not. Seems awfully unfair since he wasn't even made aware of the pregnancy or of the child for 6 years. Whether you and I think it's fair doesn't really matter. The laws as they are today don't care. I'm not a lawyer, but I can say with almost 100% certaintly that h…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:56 PM
4

If the paternity test shows that he's the dad, he'll have to pay child support. How far back "retroactive" goes depends on where you live. He should take the opportunity to ensure that he also gets as much visitation with his own kid as possible if it's his.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:28 PM
3

Read the book about it, "As Nature Made Him: The boy who was raised as a girl".
/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:53 PM
32

Not entirely accurate. Dr. Money claimed the that David accepted his new identity 100% and that it was proof that gender was a social contstruct. Only many, many years later, after gender identity theory based on this had become entrenched was it ever revealed that the experiment had been a miserable failure. Feminists never backed down, though, and there are still references to these studies with the finally known facts glossed over in almost every Women's Studies course. David didn't commit su…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:59 PM
7

It's not even understandable in that situation.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 11:49 PM
3

Pleasure chatting with you, "JayWhoo". All the very best to you.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 06:07 PM
3

Settle down. Really.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:37 PM
4

I believe the word you're looking for is Papalcentric, but I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:27 PM
3

Seemed -> Confirmed. It was a little tongue in cheek for those whose wombs are wandering. Oh, and so was that.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:23 PM
3

If you think a joke like "WAA" is misogynistic then you probably also think that this comment is literally rape.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:56 PM
5

Not to the Pope.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:45 PM
28

I propose that Alcoholics Anonymous come up with Women Alcoholics Anonymous. They can call it "WAA!"
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:47 PM
71

women's rape fantasy novels like 50 Shades Of Grey That's not porn. That's "erotica", you see. /s
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:23 PM
51

The evidence was that the Earth went around the sun in the 1600s. Ideology doesn't care about evidence.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:22 PM
0

I'm not trying to subvert anything. I'll leave it at that since responding to the rest of your comment would be construed as an attempt at "subversion" by your awkward definition.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:37 PM
2

What's it about?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:35 PM
2

I support anyone's rights to be whatever they want as long as they're not infringing on my rights. Dude wants to wear women's panties? Doesn't affect me. I support your choice to do that and I think you have every right to do so. Woman wants to sleep with other woman (or women, men, trans, two-spirited people and asexuals all at the same time)? All the power to you, I won't stand in your way. Either of these people want to put me down or prevent me from getting a job because I'm a not trans or l…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:26 PM
27

I know this is taking a page out of the 70's women's lib manual, but "getting out" is only barely option for men with kids. With near certainty of losing regular contact with your kids, likely financial ruin, and the very real prospect of being falsely accused (the person who's hitting you is already obvisouly unstable) ... To just say "get out" is almost dismissive -- it's sometimes easier just to "take it like a man" and hope it doesn't escalate too far. Fortunately, most times, it does not. E…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:03 PM
39

First Cosmo, then Esquire -- it's been a good week.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:57 PM
1

I don't think that the "boundary" of MRM issues has anything to do with minority/majority/all status. A minority of men are circumcized (I believe), but MRM takes this issue on enthusiastically.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:51 PM
1

Disagree. Fracking is external to a person's sex. Homosexuality is either a part of, or complement to your sex, depending on perspective.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:49 PM
4

Was anecdotal but Google found this.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:28 PM
3

I think the MRM needs to draw more attention to these types of issues (over-prescription of Ritalin, overly broad-based definitions of autism, and in general the medicalization of simply being male). Like it or not, in the early stages of this movement, boys will get more sympathy and attention than men.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:12 PM
1

Interesting points. I was thinking about it from the perspective that most homo- and bi-sexual people are male.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:06 PM
1

I already conceded your point re: "us and them" to others. See my other comments.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:58 AM
1

agreed. Is there a way to change the headline to remove the us and them reference? I'm a newbie Redditor.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:41 PM
9

No doubt some truth to that, but there's no shortage of male feminists or female MRAs. Just because reddit is predominantly male (I'm guessing) doesn't mean that they fit nicely into this camp or that one. I really wish it wasn't an "us" vs. "them" thing, but from what I can tell that's already been covered plenty. Edit: There's also a ton of men on Reddit who would never identify as MRAs, but a metric shit-tonne of men and women who would identify as feminists even though they probably believe …
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:08 PM
7

"Because I could see that this was all a silly ploy. See? She's just fine."
/r/MensRights19/07/13 05:15 PM
5

Google's DNS doesn't censor human rights sites, AFAIK. Edit: Yet.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 05:02 PM
5

It's done at the DNS level. If you want to see what they filter, change your DNS servers to: 198.153.192.60 & 198.153.194.60 How to change DNS in Windows 7
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:49 PM
60

As pointed out by CliffEdge in comments below, send Cosmo thanks here: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/about/contact-us
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:01 PM
30

It's like gift wrapping a present.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:26 PM
9

Posters already torn down.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 12:15 PM
3

Only federally. Offend the wrong person in Canada and you'll be in front of a provincial Human Rights Tribunal so fast your head will spin. http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/06/23/supreme-court-upholds-decision-to-force-comedian-to-pay-15000-for-tirade-of-ugly-words-against-lesbian-heckler/
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter