TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GTCtry_another Archive

View 3 posts and 672 comments by GTCtry_another on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The score is a net result. There were almost certainly downvotes, possibly more than 16. There is no "us" doing all the voting here; reddit (its non-private subs like this) is the most open, democratic type of public forum in existence. Not every worthy topic gets the attention you'd like to see it receive in a perfect world. "Oh look MRAs don't actually care about [x] because [extremely selective and tenuous anecdotal evidence that disregards counterexamples]"? A feminist shill if I ever saw on…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 02:56 AM
6

Uhh, I think it was just "respect" before feminism came along.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 01:17 AM
44

More like "I don't want to live in a world where I can be accused of lying, where due process and/or critical thought is applied to things my sex claims and where false rape accusations aren't in my personal toolbox of tactics to use against men I have it out for for some petty reason or another."
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:27 PM
1

Shh...just wake up. We all want you to come out of this okay.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:19 PM
6

I am dumber for having read the abstract. Just look at the keywords and it's obvious this is just another example of "relationships among men bad; relationships among women good" nonsense. I've already discussed this hateful attitude extensively enough. It was the first topic I posted on this sub.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:23 AM
2

As long as civilization exists, men will be responsible for everything that they do and everything that women do. EDIT: The BF's a scumbag and probably is somewhat of a threat, btw. I'm just commenting on the double standard here.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 01:06 AM
3

Yes, but it's a shame the video contained no claim with enough substance to debunk. It was just a series of assertions about how feminism is for nice people who believe in good things like the mythological creature called gender equality, and don't like bad things like sexism. But really, it wasn't even that, it was just an overly bubbly feminist saying, "Hey look everyone, I'm bubbly and I'm a feminist!"
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:32 PM
0

Shhhh dat PR doe.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:33 PM
1

Nice!
/r/MensRights27/11/15 10:09 AM
1

That's pretty great to hear! and yeah, I hope so... This is one of the few Reddit posts I've come across that I sincerely can't wait for an update on.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 09:09 AM
1

Please keep us posted on any developments, particularly any news coverage documenting this story. Not saying this isn't the type of thing that can and does happen, but it's pretty common for people to make shit up on reddit, you understand. Horrifying situation for anyone to be in. Anyone who does what you described your friend's housemate as doing should, one way or the other, be kept out of society permanently. Same goes for anyone who would be tempted even for a second to treat her leniently …
/r/MensRights27/11/15 05:30 AM
0

Not bad but I'm not particularly convinced of her assertions about the exceptionality of British gender roles in the industrial era compared so broadly with the rest of human history and cultures. The idea of the public as the masculine sphere emerged because factories? Sounds kinda weak tbh.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:56 AM
2

"How to lose [a few elitist-SJW game critics] and influence [the ever-growing number of normal people whom these critics are alienating by locking themselves in an echo chamber of moralizing busybodies]." The irony literally hurts.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:50 AM
1

Oh my bad then. I knew that certain stops require an o and others a u but I barely know enough to make dumb weeaboo-sounding jokes.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:14 AM
3

Your waifu sounds like a daiko daiku. EDIT: Thanks mr u/tallwheel.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:05 PM
9

Men have a bias for women as well, not for their own group. Therefore men do not have an ingroup bias. That is what my edit was meant to clarify, but I don't know that you saw it. I thought it was a ninja edit though. :( Men with very little sexual experience and men with excessive sexual experience tend to view women in an extremely preferential light. Now that, I didn't know. But it's interesting! What do they/you think accounts for this? I suppose it makes sense for men who tend to have good …
/r/MensRights25/11/15 05:05 AM
9

Don't men hold the same bias, just to a lesser degree? EDIT: "the same bias" = Women Are Wonderful Effect
/r/MensRights25/11/15 04:52 AM
2

Women choose not to go, not explicitly refused Just as good. :D But yeah I agree with you 100%.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 12:42 AM
2

shrugs Gay cruising motels/resorts...sports, up to the level where you get female reporters in the locker rooms...the Bohemian Grove...rabbinical schools, maybe? That's like all I got.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 12:19 AM
0

They're fine, ethically and legally and what not (as long as men have our own spaces too), but I just think they cater to the most neurotic and imbecilic human beings on the planet: women who are able to lie to themselves about the fact that it is other women rather than men who are judging their every move and physical detail, and are okay with accepting that lie if it means feeling less threatened by other lies that they've told themselves about how "dangerous" men are.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 06:57 PM
26

Actually the argument that feminism is about making sex less sexy has been probably one of the most popular ones for...pretty much ever. Really resonates with people who aren't sexless, blind imbeciles. Also, what?: If you disagree with policies promoted by feminists, attack the problems with the policies. Don't whine about the perceived outcomes. How are negative outcomes of policies not problems with the policies? FFS, try making some sense.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:47 PM
6

It's totally legitimate to be turned off by women who don't practice the traditional feminine arts and, no, that by itself is not misogyny. But to imagine that traditional women don't exist at all anymore? well...I don't know that that's what you believe, first of all, but in any case it's not true. I'm not sure that women have ever showered daily, though. They don't typically need to like men usually do. And are there no tattoos that you find feminine and tasteful on a woman? I mean I guess the…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:48 PM
1

Oh! Nice to hear the family court's been somewhat working out for you so far. Hope her stubbornness ends up costing her three times or more in the long run.... Well, maybe I don't really hope that because I'd like there to be plenty of money left for your family. But I'm sure it would serve her right. Anyway I thought you might be talking about your own mother. Your story's still a good example of the general type of thing I was talking about, even though at the time I was really thinking of sin…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:15 PM
1

Maybe she's grown to resent her husband and that's why she's decided to hate all Mexicans. Maybe she wasn't like that when she married him. It seems like the kind of thing that would happen with an entitled woman like that.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:52 AM
1

Maybe those tests aren't actually testing actually empathy, but are just allowing people to score well based on assertions. I dunno. I'd have to see them, but the tests I've seen for empathy seem to just be examining the degree to which people pay lip service to progressive buzzwords like "tolerance". I think the operational definition of empathy underpinning such tests is crude to the point of being devoid of conceptual content; a lot of psychological batteries are just plain shitty like that a…
/r/MensRights22/11/15 06:50 AM
1

Well, to be fair Milo does not identify as a men's rights activist. (I think it's because MRAs got cross with his crazy lesbian frenemy Julie Bindel.) However, as far as the English language is concerned, he is an activist for the rights of men (and boys), and therefore, by tautology, a men's rights activist.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:56 AM
2

Empathy is a tricky thing to examine quantitatively and comparatively. Frankly I don't think any attempts to do so work. Like many other human faculties or psychological characteristics—intellect, "emotional intelligence", sexual attraction, mental illnesses—"empathy" does not refer to a "thing" that can be represented by a variable that can be isolated. But I think being presumed to be more empathetic actually does a lot of harm to women's ability/willingness to make an effort to empathize, to …
/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:37 AM
1

Oh a different-OP post, meaning a post by a different OP? You didn't communicate that. Because "different OP post" could be reasonably interpreted as a different post by (this) OP. Which is how I read it.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 10:25 PM
1

Wait the OP for this topic also said that? Well if so, I don't agree and I doubt many people here would.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:46 PM
7

Well that's horrific and definitely puts the final nail in the coffin of any notion I may have still been harboring that women are naturally empathetic.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 08:35 PM
2

then saying she's a victim of power dynamics and predatory behavior if shes 35 and the guy shes fucking is 68. Who the fuck is claiming that?
/r/MensRights21/11/15 08:07 PM
8

"Honesty"? The last panel was the most disingenuous of them all. You think these are the type of people to "radically question and redefine masculinity in a supportive way"? How naïve can you even be to think they're "honestly" interested in being "supportive" of men? Here's a good litmus test for the sincerity of any claim to be interested in supporting men (as opposed to helping women by "fixing" men): does it shoehorn in a bit of lip service on the currently most-discussed issue affecting men…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:23 PM
2

Neither of them is remotely slim. Bitch has reverse anorexia.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:51 PM
7

Is nobody gonna point out the boy's own father white knighting for his son's own rapist? Fuck, how is it that even parents prioritize the wellbeing of random grown-ass women over that of their own children? And aparently all a woman has to do is get a little misty-eyed and pretend not to have understood what she was doing and even men with years of experience as judges experience a complete loss of rational judgment. This is what makes me think that gender equality is completely inviable. The in…
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:31 PM
2

Honest and trustworthy, though.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 09:21 PM
3

The instinct of both men and women to capitulate to women's needs even if it means throwing men and boys under the bus, has clearly reached its reductio. And while I do not prescribe traditionalism in practice as the immediate solution to this, the collapse of traditionalist gender roles is absolutely to blame, has produced an unsustainable state of anomy within the male population, and so will itself collapse. If feminists knew what's good for them they would dread the day when their failing ex…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 10:20 PM
2

Which in my experience is a combination of the person doing the hiring thinking, "Well I spent the time and money -- if it's good enough for me, it should be good enough for everyone", and a degree being a mark of someone that will do everything they're told for four+ years and pay for the privilege. I find that an interesting and oddly refreshing take, since I always figured it was simply a result of the assumption that academic commitment translates to work ethic, perhaps encouraged and exacer…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 09:47 AM
49

1915: "This white woman says this black man raped her. That's enough proof for me; we all know those niggers can't control their animal impulses!" 2015: "This woman says this male college student raped her. That's enough proof for me; we all know these dudebro fuckboys are part of a rampant rape culture!" ^ feminism's idea of "progress"
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:55 AM
1

Hmm, but we are (and have always been) misogynists, dontcha kno?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/15 07:06 AM
2

This is why I said it encourages racism, rather than is racist. Though perhaps it would have been better to say it simply leads to racial profiling/assumptions that hurt minorities/undermine their progress.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 06:43 AM
1

How I long for the innocent days when meatspin, goatse, lemonparty...even tubgirl were edgy.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/15 05:38 AM
3

Well there are plenty of male feminist lackeys on Berkeley's campus, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:21 AM
1

IIRC that is why Clarence Thomas dislikes it.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 05:09 AM
13

But it also encourages racism against the people it favors because it leads to doubt being cast on the degree to which their personal merits contributed to their success.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:56 AM
3

So does the rape of five thousand seven hundred and twelve six-month-olds in the middle of Disney Land on seniors day.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:54 AM
1

"Unicornism is solely about summoning unicorns to this dimension. Sure, millions of babies have been sacrificed for rituals practiced by mainstream followers of Unicornism after we found those ancient scrolls that claimed that this was the way to summon unicorns—but I don't see any unicorns! So clearly that has nothing to do with my religion, which, again, by definition, is solely about manifesting unicorns on the earthly plane. Anything that doesn't cause unicorns to exist in our common reality…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 04:10 AM
23

How courageous to hope that the man you consider a rampaging cock monster gets kicked off campus to become other people's problem, never to answer legally for his alleged crimes but still to be denied education under a presumption of guilt, and therefore to become exponentially more likely to offend, as a disaffected cauldron of stewing antisocial tendencies set loose on the general public after being marked with one of the worst social stigmas a man can bear. If she really was raped that would …
/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:15 AM
51

Lynching. (For the slow, and unejukatid forinners.)
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:23 AM
1

The overlap's pretty minuscule as overlaps go. I mean I can be a lazy, sedentary fuck for months and still run a 5k faster than my health-conscious female friend who's the same height as me and actually trained for it and runs regularly and, unlike me, doesn't smoke. I can't imagine how hard the average woman would have to work to be on par with firemen who are basically Greek gods among men.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:55 PM
0

Talk about splitting hairs.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:51 PM
2

Summary of higher education. In theory. In reality it's important because employers say it is.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:26 PM
3

Even in a setting that's mostly women.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:25 PM
0

u w0t m8
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:24 PM
2

Privilege, thy name is feminism.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:57 AM
1

it was actually quite a common practice not too long ago (80's i think?) where doctors would literally just choose the gender of a baby if they were born with both sex organs. Usually they were made "female", if I'm not mistaken. "Easier to make a hole than a pole."
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:14 AM
1

I don't know what you call it. I call it the reason gender segregation always existed.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/15 02:04 AM
2

So...what's the rights angle? It doesn't have a single thing to do with his rights; I don't see anyone saying the husband has literally no right to be distressed about this. I understand he feels this cheapens his wife's posthumous award, but I don't even see him saying this is about his feelings or rights. If anything he's saying it takes away women's right to be considered for this honor. But it's Glamour's right to give their own award to whomever they want and risk discrediting themselves if…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:39 PM
3

More like "Men and women aren't the same but all institutions should treat them the same and the 'equal treatment' which they receive should be based solely on the needs and desires of women."
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/15 10:21 PM
11

Notice almost all the signators are women. Complaining that women haven't completely taken over higher education (which is actually debatable). The collective entitlement and hatred of men's success would be stunning if it weren't such a common sort of sentiment. Also notice that men speaking authentically about their lived experiences without paying lip service to groundless feminist dogmata like "patriarchy theory" is verboten! As in, the only way they'll tolerate men talking about their and/o…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:09 PM
4

The Equality and Diversity Committee is clear that the main focus of gender equality work should continue to be on the inequalities faced by women, and in particular the under-representation of women in the professoriate and senior management. Well this certainly has me convinced women are oppressed! Wait "oppressed" means "shown blatant favoritism in academia", right? Eh. In any case they must be oppressed if the putative "inequalities" they collecgively "face" need such constant focus and it a…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:54 PM
2

Science has disproved this numerous times, most tragically with the john/joan case where a botched circumcision left a boy without a penis so the doc decided to give him a vagina and have the parents raise him as a girl. I'm pretty sure there must be at least equally tragic examples considering how common it was to just cut it off, slice it open, sew it up 'n call it "her" if you had an infant with ambiguous genitalia.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:47 PM
7

Whatever you think of transgenderism, I really don't see what this has to do with men's right. At all. Unless you saying men have too many rights now if they can be eligible for women's rewards? In which case I'm sure there's some RadFem sub this would be better suited for. Nothing to do with men's rights in even the most oblique way.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:40 PM
17

Lol "doesn't make a good front page"? Bullshit. Whatever gets to the front page makes a good front page. They just know that if political ideologies are allowed to compete unrestricted, the "wrong" side will win visibility.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:21 PM
9

Marriage is basically a two-person cult. She's the leader, he's the believer.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:04 PM
2

"Look how hard women have it! Women in Saudi Arabia have so much less freedom than men in America! Clearly this is a problem of gendered oppression!"
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:00 PM
2

Well, I know of this quote by the suffragette Frances Willard: "You have put the ballot in the hands of your black men, thus making them the political superiors to your white women. Never before in the history of the world have men made former slaves the political masters of their former mistresses." Which is really more to do with the virulent racism held by many than it is anything else, but this was at a time when black men would have been disproportionately disenfranchised by property requir…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:55 PM
2

With the family courts, gender quotas, favoritism of girls in education, etc., readily found in America, the UK, Scandinavia, etc., all serving as model feminist "utopias", I'd be shocked if you could "sell" feminism to any truly rational Middle Eastern man. When they say, "If we allow women such-and-such a privilege, it will lead to a breakdown of the family and of the sexes' ability and willingness to fulfill traditional duties," you cannot call that slippery slope a "fallacy" when they actual…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:07 PM
2

What bossy dames.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 04:48 PM
2

Oh thank God she's hideous; people might actually be outraged by this.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:06 PM
-9

Which is why men should be in charge. They actually have the responsibility not to fuck up. EDIT: From the standpoint of men's PR it's a relief to see that so many people even on this sub can't handle/won't accept the truth.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:00 PM
1

"Patronizing"? "Projecting"? Wtf are you even talking about. How about you read what I wrote? Actually, the thing is, I don't think I've ever heard a male feminist claim that the supposedly ubiquitous messages of our fractally misogynistic culture ever influenced him to do anything but become a feminist. That is, I am not aware of one male feminist (maybe you can show me one) who actually says, "I know what I'm talking about when I talk about societal encouragement of misogyny, because I used to…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:37 PM
1

I just thought the comment about having "known literally thousands" and having a more accurate sense of what's "usual" among SJWs than anyone who hasn't known preposterous numbers of them, was funny. I mean someone who's "known literally thousands" of any group will know a lot more white-supremacist sympathizers in that group than someone who has an average level of familiarity with that group, even if the group is generally anti-white-supremacist or white supremacists are generally antipathetic…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:43 PM
1

You sound like you don't understand sarcasm any better than you understand the concept of "knowing" a person.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:53 PM
1

I've known literally thousands. Most impressive. I look forward to reading your peer-reviewed findings. But you know most researchers don't typically use the word "known" when describing their relation to their subjects. "Surveyed" or maybe even "interviewed" would be more common, I'd think. Oops, but then I haven't "known literally thousands" of sociologists!
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:50 PM
5

Yeah I got that. Wise man. Fuck having children anyway. Existence is a horrible thing to inflict on the next generation.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:40 PM
4

Unless you're disowned or beaten for it, or live in one of those medieval parts of America where people still actually care, I guess I agree.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:53 PM
5

In a lifelong relationship, you fall out of love occasionally. And eventually back in. And on and on. It's what you do. Like those Geico commercials. It's almost part of the definition of marriage. (No I've never been married, but this is what I get from talking to my mom and observing/hearing other married people talk about their problems.) Anyone expecting marriage to be a permanent fix for loneliness and that feeling of not having a "soul mate" is laboring under the naïve delusion of some fai…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:44 PM
1

And them being gay. Well I guess there was that one time a gay friend approvingly linked to that Rose McGowan piece calling gay men more misogynistic than straights. But in my experience, gay guys who talk about the "gay community" tend to talk as though it were a monolith yet at the same time they are the brilliantly self-aware exception. (You know, exactly like an SRSer talking about Reddit.) And it can't be said that I don't know many of them or that I haven't discussed this in-depth. Still t…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:29 PM
1

I know a decent handful...probably as many as female feminists, but no, I wouldn't say "many". We don't really talk a lot but they've never talked about a turning point, or talked as if they'd experienced one, as far as I know. They all sound like fucking Steve Shives when the issue comes up and are more sanctimonious than the chicks. Maybe it's geographical? Or maybe because like half of them are gay...
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:16 PM
5

I'm pro-choice for the most part but I find the characterization of the pro-life (or perhaps more accurately pro-birth) position as misogyny to be a delusional bit of psychologizing. I do not find a particular propensity towards genuine hatred of the female sex among Republicans.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:17 AM
4

And do they suffer a higher rate of PTSD from this than men do from seeing combat?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:10 AM
2

Well I guess some dudes just read like chicks. When you have feminist voices buzzing around your headspace I guess it happens. :p
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:10 AM
2

I didn't think he was, but damn. He's got some mega balls in his lyrics and that was maybe the best thing I've ever watched haha. Thank you! XD
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:07 AM
1

Eh, I hadn't actually heard of him but I can see how this undermines some of my point (despite qualifying it with "conceivably"). He does present himself as basically a thoughtless slob, and notwithstanding disanalogies between him and Swift that I won't even go into... you're right; male stereotypes can be parodied by artists without creating highly publicized outrage for the positive light in which they're cast. (I take my unfamiliarity with him as evidence of this.) In that respect I'd say I …
/r/MensRights09/11/15 05:23 AM
2

I don't categorically take issue with the term "androcentric", and I can certainly understand where feminists like Swift are coming from. As I implied above, gendered stereotypes are not necessarily purely androcentric or gynocentric but can have elements of both attitudes, one of which may be objectively more harmful than the other. So I'm sorry if I'm coming off as too defensive, but there is sometimes a fine line between thick skin and intellectual cowardice. The fact is that Swift is just a …
/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:45 AM
1

Nope, sorry, it's in my DNA. :)
/r/MensRights09/11/15 02:01 AM
2

Wait so if a woman abuses a man, tries to claw his eyes out at the slightest threat, and calls the cops, and he hasn't fought back or even left signs of a struggle on her (bruises from grabbing her arms, damage to her clothes), there is almost a 100% chance he will be hauled off under the "primary aggressor" law in most states—i.e. assumed to be irrationally and unjustifiably violent because he is taller/heavier/stronger/less visibly frightened. And yet society has an "androcentric" bias when re…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:59 AM
2

Lmfao look at that (presumed) lezbein bein all "heteronormative". You have to love the irony.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:46 PM
5

Huh. Well that guy is quite the male feminist unicorn then, especially if he's not lying. But lol Lots of guys would be willing to "coerce" or "push" or "tease" a drunk girl and then have sex with her, whether she verbally consented or not... but if they go to a consent workshop and that gets called "rape," well then, the result isn't "awwww you were kind of mean, weren't you?" but "you're a rapist." Actually the effect isn't "Wow this behavior is a lot worse than I realized because it's been gi…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:12 PM
7

OMG LMFAO Of course many will point out that some of the male Avengers: Age of Ultron stars didn’t do nearly as well as Scarlett Johansson. After all, Chris Evans “only” made $6.9 million, with Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, and Jeremy Renner all coming in between $2 and $6 million. Yeah let's talk about that. Maybe in the next paragraph? Sadly, this gender inequality issue spans the gamut from minimum wage earners to Hollywood. It’s increasingly becoming a hot topic among 2016 presidential hope…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 10:47 PM
3

Sounds like one of those dreaded fauxminists! Run for the hills!!
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:42 PM
1

I get that it's satire but women who get to cry at the least inconvenience should really just avoid talking about male tears altogether. Kinda a bad look. Like they're making themselves out to be experts on men's emotions just because they're women. I suppose I could see a man writing a similar article on women who don't wear makeup, say, but that would be similarly obnoxious and officious. There are a lot of reasons men don't cry just as there are a lot of reasons women don't usually go out wit…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 09:08 PM
9

But wait, all feminists have met that reformed “male feminist” guy, right? He goes around talking about all the terrible things he used to do until he discovered the light of feminism. “Oh, I used to to be a misogynist. Then I discovered that was wrong!” Actually, the thing is, I don't think I've ever heard a male feminist claim that the supposedly ubiquitous messages of our fractally misogynistic culture ever influenced him to do anything but become a feminist. That is, I am not aware of one ma…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:17 PM
1

No. I just don't see why it would. Even trying tonthink how I'd feel about them if I were chubby I just can't see myself getting butthurt over what everyone finds physically attractive. I mean, what am I, a feminist? People have a right to express body-type preferences and to cater to them in others, but more important, nobody can stop people from having these preferences. What's the point of complaining about something that will never go away and that it would be wrong to try to minimize throug…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:59 AM
15

I for one am sick of the assumption that the tension that occasionally manifests between fags and hags is purely our fault as the men in the "relationship". Ugh. No. There are a lot of reasons fag-hag relationships tend to have a shelf life, but typically it's that gay guys get fed up with being treated like clothes horses and sexless, "non-threatening" surrogate boyfriends by women who basically get all the benefits from the friendship. And the possessiveness of some women towards gay men! And …
/r/MensRights07/11/15 04:45 AM
19

I just wanna go up to whoever said this and tell her, in person, "I know you have rape fantasies, and they're normal and nothing to be ashamed of, but please leave me out of them. It makes me feel violated. Thank you."
/r/MensRights07/11/15 04:21 AM
2

What a hilarious sentiment. There would be no feminism without men's assent.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 01:58 AM
1

I swear to god you can get anything from Harrods.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/15 09:59 AM
11

Definitely this. Still, it's interesting how different her lawyer's language (in the video) is than it would likely be if she were a man: "How do you second guess that unless you're in her place going through those emotions." Do you think that a male policeman's "emotions", as such, would be relevant to whether or not a man deserved to die? Maybe he'd have spoken in terms of having to make "split-second decisions", or even about how "threatening" the situation was. And maybe it all equates to th…
/r/PussyPass06/11/15 09:53 AM
7

Sorry guys, I guess I'm just turned off by the notion of "brigading". It's all so artificial and SRS-y.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 09:24 AM
5

We don't need to "brigade". We don't need to contact the author. There are always popular comments on stories like this that make the point that people are getting fed up with this double standard. Even if there are also the idiots saying "What a lucky kid!" or whatever, which we can't do anything about. EDIT: Just my two cents. Obviously I can't stop you from brigading to your hearts' content.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:13 AM
5

She's also overweight and just plain not attractive. Watch feminists start complaining, "If she were a skinny white woman everyone would be praising her for fulfilling every boy's fantasy!"
/r/MensRights06/11/15 06:10 AM
30

And "accidentally" killing someone with a knife through the heart just is not something that happens. People fucking train to be able to kill like that with knives.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 05:44 AM
83

What a scumbag! He can't give his side of the story so why not take hers at face value, even though she's the one who killed him, making it impossible for him to give his side and giving her every incentive to demonize him as sensationally as possible. No, obviously her version of what the man whom she murdered was like is the inerrant, objective truth, and the child just doesn't know better when he says otherwise and says he's still deathly afraid of his poor, fragile mother. "Oh but she was a …
/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:45 AM
11

I can't not laugh though. Maybe because my mind was even deeper in the gutter, maybe because in a more perfect world there should be nothing particularly offensive about this. But yeah, an older man commenting like that on an attractive servicewoman would be excoriated. I honestly can't see how that would ever change, but unless it can we have a very good basis for treating the sexes unequally in other areas. Here's a short list of situations in which gender segregation and discrimination agains…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:01 AM
1

I've heard murmurs of an "autistic/Aspie" backlash against feminist thought policing looming on the horizon. They won't survive that on top of the backlash from gay men (who are sick of hearing that we're misogynists and that we owe them for victories they had nothing to do with) and men of color (who are almost always disproportionately persecuted in moral panics, which are what feminism is made of). It will be glorious.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 09:08 PM
2

"I'd feel raped and therefore would have been raped." Yeah yeah, haven't heard that one before. I've said it before and I'll say it again: if women are the more vulnerable ones in hooking up with a man, they bear the greater responsibility. Not less. Not equal. More at stake = greater responsibility for your emotional wellbeing. He's just looking for what he wants and for all he knows, you are too. If that is not true, if you're looking for some Disney fairytale bond and and you as a woman feel …
/r/MensRights04/11/15 08:26 PM
2

This woman seems so sweet and genuine. Obviously she's going to be hated by a lot of people in today's world just for that.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:29 AM
2

I never had a male teacher till high school, and the female students would routinely gossip about them "creeping on" female students. Just one more reason to keep education and faculties single-sex. Another being that women teachers discriminate wildly against boys and don't know shit about them.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:20 AM
2

The people saying that they cannot apply affirmative action to help men here are NOT feminists, they're just people in the Australian government who are talking about already-existing Australian law. You mean the already-existing feminist laws?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:35 PM
1

Fuck SPLC. They haven't done anything in decades other than abuse their authority to shame people with politically incorrect convictions as "hate mongers". Which is basically censorship. EDIT: Yes, before someone tries to make a clever, Morissette-esque remark about irony, I do hate them. Also have they managed to hire any black attorneys yet?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:02 AM
1

Like some hardcore survivalist?
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:59 PM
2

Well, you're only 21. And I don't think anyone's really content not doing anything. If they seem like they are, they've just convinced themselves they're helpless.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:24 PM
1

It's all in one's attitude and behavior in the face of an inherently nihilistic natural world, right? I guess in that respect there are as many "absurdisms" as there are psychological states among people with a particular idea of objective reality (minus the one that truly embraces nihilism).
/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:21 PM
3

I don't know many women who understand the difference between being in control of/not completely centered on one's emotions, and having less than the proper human range of emotions.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:37 PM
2

I don't know. As far as I knew it was from a letter he wrote.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:27 PM
1

spends his days volunteering with a charity while job hunting Well that's something! "Make a job of getting a job," my granddad always used to say.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:26 PM
1

Isn't nihilism kinda just half of absurdism?
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:24 PM
3

Then I'd say you're either doing it wrong or should call a suicide helpline. EDIT: Suicide prevention helpline. >.<
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:20 PM
1

That's the impression I got. (And I'm a lay man.)
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:18 PM
2

Regular journalism practice these days, unfortunately. What, you didn't get the memo? I think it was the last bit of journalistic integrity these news sites did, sending anyone who had an account with them an email explaining that they would be abandoning everything remotely resembling journalistic ethics and that nothing read on them should be taken in good faith.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:18 PM
1

Huh. Yeah I guess I don't usually think about absurdism as such but it fits my schema of reality pretty well. EDIT: Strangely I don't remember Camus resonating very well with me in high school though, come to think of it.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:33 AM
2

Well, look at the weak evidence they supply to support the implication that Jaye actually did have fear of MRAs in mind when she talked about her move. There's a funny lack of explicit context, which is filled in by the interviewer's interpretation, and the interviewer has a pretty strong bias obviously. I had a brother run for local office so I know about the tricks reporters will use to twist their interview subjects' words to support their agenda. Anyway maybe one of the guys she interviewed …
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:27 AM
13

“I just found it really fascinating, but also terrifying,” she said of the community, which largely organizes on social networks and deep web forums. Wait do they really? Or is this a misunderstanding of what "deep web" means? I just don't see why on earth anyone would bother to use a TOR browser to talk about men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:02 AM
32

Damn I'm sorry you're feeling that...but a lot of guys know exactly how that feels, if that's any comfort to think about. I've realized life is a trap since I was small, to be honest; there is (tautologically) no way out of it alive, and in the meantime we are enslaved to our flesh, subject to constant decay and the threat of disease. It is a cruel and undignified cage in which to keep the human soul, wouldn't you say? Truly the definition of being trapped, and fucked if I haven't felt that sinc…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 06:42 AM
36

"I'm blue. If I was green, I would die." ~ misheard Eiffel 65 lyrics
/r/MensRights02/11/15 04:09 AM
2

nods knowingly
/r/MensRights02/11/15 04:06 AM
69

Okay but remember, "if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you." Nietzsche
/r/MensRights02/11/15 03:14 AM
168

I'm not really sure this is appropriate, but... "The thought of suicide is a great consolation: by means of it one gets through many a dark night." Nietzsche
/r/MensRights02/11/15 03:01 AM
5

No, Mr Black, I expect it to die.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:15 AM
7

Wouldn't that just add to your feminist credentials? You've managed to turn "cunt" into a term no more offensive than, say, "dick".
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:17 PM
1

Also it leads to situations where a large amount of the businesses and organizations won't serve blacks, gays, or <insert group here>. I don't think you read my previous comment. I'd be perfectly fine with not being served because of my sex or orientation (or for that matter my race) if it also meant I could exclude people for their sex or religious convictions. At any rate I don't want to be served by someone who secretly hates my guts but isn't allowed to say so because of an authoritarian gov…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:29 PM
0

We are talking about private proprietors, not the public sector.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:03 PM
4

Why not?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:13 AM
5

Which is why straight women are allowed into gay bars No, this is all to do with legal obligation, which is strong-arm coercion at the bottom of it all. Whether bars "want" to discriminate is irrelevant; they can't legally operate if they do. And this is not a good thing for gay subcultures. You have no right, however, to deny service to either because of something they can't control. I absolutely disagree. We have no right to force people to bake us cakes even if the law says we do. We have no …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:00 AM
9

It's all well and good to say "If you don't talk about what's going on with you we can't know how to help." But when the male suicide rate increases it is not because men suddenly became more "manly" and stoic. How about looking at the social realities to which they're responding by removing themselves from society? I guaran-fucking-tee that the feminization of society will be found to influence male suicidality.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:29 AM
11

Average income of younger generation of men plummets. Women most affected. Is this the kind of compassionate concern for men's needs we can expect to see when we don't live under a "patriarchy"? Funny how much it looks like a gold-digging mentality run amock, with the media and government only concerned about men insofar as they're useful to women and capable of supporting families.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:56 AM
5

We're about to be led to the gates of hell by Anita Sarkeesian's crazy aunt.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:45 AM
9

I’ve been told to stop shouting about guns. Actually I haven’t been shouting, but sometimes when a woman talks, some people think it’s shouting. Have you ever heard a feminist fantasy so diametrically opposed to the truth? Fuck her. Future leader of the free goddamn world and here she is damseling her shitting self. What's she gonna do when she has to talk with world leaders who don't give a shitting fuck about feminism and sensitivity regarding gender? She can ride on that pussy pass through in…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:42 AM
11

Yes. This has always been a problem. And feminists call men entitled. Ha. Worst thing I've ever had a strange man do to me without my express permission is touch my butt. (I happened to want it though as I'm sure he had reasonable cause to assume.) I have never met a man so entitled he thought he could strike me with impunity. I have never met a man so entitled he thought he could bite me when I expressed a lack of interest in him. I haven't even met a man who felt entitled to get pissed off at …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:34 AM
3

Apparently she was trying to prove that the one woman on the committee was one too many!
/r/MensRights31/10/15 09:32 PM
14

Self-esteem (of women or men) isn't a social issue, but an individual issue. You can't gain self-esteem except by realizing your worth as an individual. Being shielded from "harmful opinions" will only make you weaker!
/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:20 AM
3

And let's turn the NFL into a bunch of dispensable human billboards running around giving each other TBI while advertising women's health research! Nothing absurd and disgusting about that at all.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:17 AM
5

It's funny that feminists tend to admit that making light of male rape, especially in prisons, is rape culture (well, "part of" rape culture but close enough), but they don't ever mention it until after antifeminists bring it up. We're the ones who identify it correctly as the primary problem with society's attitudes toward rape. Feminists have a whole slew of red herrings and such that they keep stashed away until they can pull them out and pretend they are a substantial concern of feminism. Fo…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 12:40 AM
1

Or maybe just "/progressive logic".
/r/MensRights31/10/15 12:05 AM
2

Which is why assaulting a man after he touches you against your consent (say hitting him with a purse) should be a more serious offense than assaulting a woman after she touches you without your consent, because the former is more likely to happen and is therefore more serious when it does happen, and anyway it is motivated by a more pervasive prejudice, and so must be dealt with more seriously. /feminist logic
/r/MensRights31/10/15 12:04 AM
8

Who ever said anything about solidarity? With men who have legitimate problems? Sure. With people who unfairly suffer because of how society and its institutions (say education or family courts) are structured? Sure. But somehow I suspect your solidarity comment indicates you are one of those gays who think that I have a moral obligation always to agree with "my people" and that if the majority of my friends aren't "my people" (i.e. from our ~5% of the population), I'm some kind of sexual traito…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 11:18 PM
12

im gay and live in new york city and i still have a hard time accepting myself for who i am Well gee, better blame everyone else then, right! I'm gay in the Midwest and have 3 straight older brothers whom I have never envied for their relationship dynamics. I hardly see your creds superseding mine; if anything you probably have too tight-knit a group of liberal gay friends to bounce your grievances off of. I just don't understand how New York gays manage to be so sensitive and thin-skinned but i…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:57 PM
13

I do disagree for the most part. The most unfair and narrowly defined roles for men these days are a direct result of feminist legislation and narrative control. Men can't defend themselves physically against violent women. Men's and boys' spaces are increasingly scarce and limited. Men have most of the same responsibilities in relationships, but none of the mitigating privileges, that they always used to have. Men can't express all kinds of normal instincts without being thought a menace to soc…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:33 PM
5

Then let me confirm, as a homo, that it was some funny shit. I almost choked to death laughing (while eating) at a couple parts. The whole depiction of YAOI was pretty spot on. YAOI is specifically created by women and marketed to them. This episode specifically depicts shounen-ai, or boy love. (Bara, in contrast, is much more up my alley—gay pornographic manga created by men and featuring hyper masculine, usually apishly hairy men. I think the term means something like "grotesque"; bodybuilding…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 08:56 PM
1

If you have to convince the majority of the people who speak a language that your definition is correct, it is by definition not. It's just what an ever-diminishing portion of the population wants other people to think of their movement. Also aren't the two women shown in the vid the same ones who talked about "white feminism" being "problematic"? "Oh, I know how we can fix public perceptions of our movement! More racism!"
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:28 PM
6

Makes it sound as though he were advocating for a "men's health issue" rather than acting as an apologist for the disproportionate focus on women's health issues.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:22 PM
1

Apparently men have just been becoming more masculine. Not like we can identify any more obvious social trends. /s
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:57 PM
2

Wait...do they have flappers and speakeasies?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:27 PM
1

Also the positive score on my comment suggests that my expanded definition explaining why "cucks" ought to be called "cucks", is more resonant than dissonant with the popular sense of the word. I might like to take a poll, in fact!
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:13 PM
1

Okay, so how do you explain "cuckservative"? Let me re-disclaim this nonsense: my original disclaimer to my "diatribe" was actually an explanation or elaboration on the popular usage/sense of the word, which involves a much more general sense of domination of men by the perceived female/effeminate will. This is the way it is used, or is at the very least already within the realm of possibilities for the popular understanding of the term; the only reason I mentioned "unsavory connotations", etc.,…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:07 PM
6

Feminism has a body count.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:43 PM
1

but the widespread and accepted thought of Cuck is to be cuckholded in a sexual way. No, it definitely is not. I have never heard anyone call someone a cuck for his political/ideological views and mean it as a literal suggestion that he is in a relationship in which he is being cuckolded.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:41 PM
1

Is the JLENS sexual? Because it literally looks more like that than a dick.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:07 PM
5

Yeah I don't get any of this either...including how the fuck this story belongs here. The "reverse the gender roles" exercise doesn't yield obviously different attitudes or consequences for a male teacher drawing a penis on a boy's work...maybe a vagina on a girl's? I dunno. That would make more sense since girls are coddled so fucking ridiculously (hence feminism and the degree to which it's always been tolerated). Also, that's not a penis. It's the JLENS.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:06 PM
9

Disclaimer: a lot of people on both sides of the issue get up in arms whenever anyone uses the word "cuck". I'm aware the term has a lot of unsavory connotations and a questionable history, but let me give what I think is a perfectly legitimate definition of the word. A cuck is someone who is intellectually cuckolded as a result of the reductio ad absurdum of masculine gallantry. Intellectual cuckoldry is the forfeiture of one's capacity for critical thought with respect to men's issues, without…
/r/MensRights30/10/15 05:12 AM
19

He was smart. He didn't retaliate. Although in a just society he could have cold-cocked her with impunity. Everyone would see it as basic fathering instinct kicking in.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:57 AM
1

Don't be a victim doubter!
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:26 PM
1

What horrible Satanic book are you talking abou—oooh...
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:15 PM
6

Really it's all well and good to say "not all feminists", but I thought "all MRAs" were inherently as radical as these, y'know, "radical Feminists" (according to the mainstream media). If so, there should be a comparable MRM event, no? Surely if you really wanted to, you could amass a comparable presence of angry men to trash public and private spaces over their discontentment with women gaining rights? Y'know, what with all that rampant "toxic masculinity"...
/r/MensRights29/10/15 11:11 PM
8

Men are pretty wonderful people. They prevent significantly more violent crimes than women do. They sacrifice their lives to liberate entire countries. They have always protected the women in their lives as if (as if) these women mattered more than them. They have invented significantly more things that benefit society. They are overwhelmingly responsible for maintaining infrastructure, power plants, etc. Women give birth and understand babies and those are definitely indispensible abilities for…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:16 PM
2

I don't understand how any of this is anarchism. Who determines "just" wages? Who participates in these "democratic" elections? and who decides who participates? What authority is granted to leaders? Who enforces these "laws"? How would their malcontents not be said to be governed under this system? And are women who participate in violent military action also, being women, "free from violence"? If they are injured are they still to be treated before men who are injured in the same struggle? Oh,…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:40 AM
16

This is why "You're victim blaming!" is not a valid argument (and I know it's not even formally an argument but it is presented as an implicit argument since nobody would defend a "victim blamer"). Just because you're a victim of something (being hit—waaaah) doesn't mean you're not to blame or not victimizing someone else (with much more malicious and sustained violence).
/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:13 PM
2

And lol @ "Dear White America: Your toxic masculinity is killing you". Have black American and latino culture suddenly become super feminist?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 04:03 AM
5

Spoiler alert: because we're rational.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:59 AM
9

It's a weird blend of traditionalism (girls, but not boys, are to be protected) with feminist cultural-revisionist justifications (boys harass girls; not the other way around). It's also the reason girls are so much more comfortable harassing boys. They don't know what it means to be held accountable for your actions. Same reason they blame men for sex they regret. Same reason they find a man to blame when they hear about a violent woman. Same reason they generally want all the benefits of being…
/r/MensRights27/10/15 03:44 AM
3

demonstrated misogynistic views towards trans women, including continually misgendering trans women Ah yes, the old "transmisogyny". How's that work, again? "You hate women because you don't think Cait Jenner is a woman"? So say you actually hate Bruce Jenner just because you don't think he's a woman...how is that hating women? Seems like hating someone because "he's" not a woman is kind of the opposite of hating someone because "she" is a woman.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:58 PM
2

The first wave: telling politicians what women want directly, instead of through their husbands. Surely the representatives at that time were mostly the husbands of bored white feminist letter writers? In any case those duplicitous bitches were falsely posing as members of their constituency while nagging senators about things like prostitution, prohibition and women's labor (male laborers be fucked).
/r/MensRights26/10/15 10:44 PM
1

would you like some kianty with your face? No thank you, I'd prefer a nice single-malt scotch. which orgies are you going to? Ones without women, obviously. If women did attend I wouldn't consider their getting gang banged or whatever "ungallant", though. That's what they come for, isn't it? It's definitely ungallant to say it's primarily their own damn fault if the sex is "bad" or "unfulfilling", though, but that's what I do say. The same goes for the men, of course, but again, we don't have a …
/r/MensRights25/10/15 10:03 PM
1

If either stereotype falls entirely out of vogue I will pay you a million dollars and eat my own face! From where I stand they are here to stay, at least among homosexual men and women themselves (you know, only the tastemakers of society; no big deal). By the way, I really don't mean to be a dick with this comment but the fact you think orgies are ungallant (except in the strictest traditional sense) strikes me as charmingly gallant. But that's neither here nor there; I said most, not all. Now …
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:41 PM
2

Oh it's not all that devoid of truth. Sure, implying men have ever unilaterally orchestrated a sexual revolution to trick the feeble-minded dames into submitting to their appetites is going too far, but if men and women really didn't have vastly different sexual/relationship strategies, why is gay male hookup culture showing no signs of relenting even as homosexuality becomes more normalized? (Yet I have never heard of gay "regret rape".) And on the other hand, the joke "What does a lesbian brin…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:19 PM
2

You shitlord!
/r/MensRights25/10/15 01:49 AM
1

Hmm, both good points. We'll need to settle this like men: with an Opression-Off! First to keep a woman out of a STEM field shall be deemed correct.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 12:36 AM
0

The only thing I learned from the airbrushed images in Playboy, was that in this world, women were not real and that sexy came in one incredibly narrow set of measurements. I would spend the next decade learning how not to compare myself to. Guiz did u kno grrls shudn hafta deal with insecurity growing up and learn and grow as a result, like everyone else? After all, we don't want teh wimmin learning, let alone developing the ability to navigate the world without being mollycoddled and defended …
/r/MensRights25/10/15 12:33 AM
6

My god I'm glad I read the whole thing. The science history was excellently laid out and explained (if still impenetrable in parts to lay readers), but the piece really takes off when the author brings up statistics on modern education and eviscerates the women-in-STEM agenda. Just savage.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:00 PM
4

many educators take for granted that boys and reading problems come as a package Because 99% of these so-called "educators" are women, who invariably ask themselves, "What did I/would I have liked to read as a girl?" when setting reading assignments. Seriously, this is why coeducation is shit. You just can't have a curriculum, let alone an administration and educational environment, that works to the benefit of girls and boys equally, since they thrive and fail under vastly different conditions.…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 09:09 PM
1

Eh. I can agree that this is something to be generally diligent in guarding against. That said, what are we supposed to do if someone posts a plausible story about being the target of a false rape accusation? Or about being the victim of rape for that matter? You seem to be suggesting that because we don't have access to all the facts we shouldn't do the one thing we're here to do in these cases, which is offer help and support. Obviously any story posted here could be entirely made up, barring …
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:49 PM
3

You're retarded. "Corrective rape" for men would mean women raping gay men. Get your fucking terms in order.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 10:12 PM
1

I thought it was feminists who like to claim that. I'm so confused. I'm gonna take a nap. (Hopefully I don't rape someone in my dreams.)
/r/MensRights22/10/15 10:59 PM
1

So I tried to post this comment but it didn't let me, and I suspect it's not just technical errors. Either it contained censored language (very likely if they filter comments in that way) or I'm banned from commenting because of the one other comment I ever left there, and they didn't tell me because they just like to be passive aggressive cunts in everything they do. Anyway, for your amusement, here is my comment: Trigger warning: It's about to get real. I'll very likely be "victim blaming" and…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:49 PM
3

I like this guy. Is he gay? I ask because I see a rainbow flag in the background and I've been seeing what seems like exponential levels of gay—and even some trans*—antifeminist backlash and support, in content if not in name, for men's rights. (About a month back I think it was, I even remember noticing that the majority of stickied posts for a few weeks were by GBT redditors, including one of mine.) I can understand why the homos/queers would be starting to get fed up with feminism. We hate be…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:03 PM
1

To put the ideological differences between conservatism and liberalism/progressivism in more concrete terms: My mom (a Catholic conservative) works for an organization which helps low-income families (almost entirely single mothers and their children) by (in part) providing diapers, formula, clothes, etc.—for pennies or less—on the condition that the mothers attend classes in life skills (parenthood, relationships, résumé writing, etc.) which the organization provides. It has numerous partner ag…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 09:25 PM
1

Not my argument. Anyway that's bullshit and you know it, since "religious fundamentalism" (fake concept) concerns...wait for it...religious conviction; conservatism concerns political ideology. So even if 100% of conservatives happened to identify with some form of "religious fundamentalism", conservative fundies themselves would understand that that is an objectively separate ideology (personal morality, a specific exegetical school, etc.) from their politics (limited government interference in…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 08:45 PM
1

If most liberals/progressives themselves saw a difference, I might stop.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:45 PM
1

It's relevant because lezzers are the queens of whataboutery, and must have planted all sorts of stupid ideas about their first-world-gay-women problems in his head. They have such a "Me too!" complex. In fact it's more a "Me especially!" complex. How else could they have the audacity not only to compare their persecution to that of gay men, but say it's compounded (rather than diminished) by the fact that they're women?
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:41 AM
1

Most people don't care about hard facts, and most people have to supplement their limited intelligence with feelings (just think how dumb someone with a 100 IQ really is). But I'm not aware of any difference between liberal and conservative attitudes towards "hard facts" categorically. Instead the main difference between liberals and conservatives are, physiologically speaking, more sensitive sympathetic nervous systems (heightened perception of danger and feelings of disgust) among conservative…
/r/MensRights20/10/15 03:19 AM
1

LMFAO don't tell me you think liberals want people to be happy?
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:49 PM
5

Feminism made me a homo. I freely admit the dominance of feminism and an increased incidence of homosexuality are comorbid with an imminently doomed civilization. But for the same reasons, going with men instead of women is now adaptive. Hooray! Sorry heteros. :(
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:46 PM
2

Why does feminism believe that anything which isn't an even 50/50 split between the genders is inherently the product of sexism? It doesn't. It believes that any low-risk field which isn't at least 50% female is sexist. Even more so the more prestigious it is.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:42 PM
1

There are systematic problems with how psychologists define and study empathy. (See what I did there? I combined both parts of E-S theory!) "Oh, look, women are more worried about such-and-such a situation which affects this other person negatively. So they're more empathetic and men are callous robots." Bullshit. Women are more worried about everything. That much is pretty well-established. Men may just be so adept at taking all variables into account—or taking into account the impossibility of…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 08:09 AM
1

I mean sure, I'm "victim blaming" if the "victims" of misogyny just happen to be the same women who are pushing for unrealistic, psychopathic social experiments where we force children to act on "rational" moral principles. But this isn't universally the case. It's just certain women and certain men (if not mainly the latter, when it comes to enabling this bullshit at the level of policy) who are creating and exacerbating strife between the sexes from a young age, to everyone's detriment.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 08:00 AM
1

You don't want to be the next generation to tell your daughters to toughen up? So you don't want to be the next generation to tell your daughters what boys hear. You don't want equality. Equality entails single-sex education from a young age. Otherwise you have to figure out a better way to suppress your feminist urge to moralize the expression of "sexist" assumptions by FUCKING CHILDREN. They are a direct result of that vast developmental stage (between gaining self-awareness and entering puber…
/r/MensRights19/10/15 07:54 AM
1

A reasonably free economy is not a zero-sum game, but allocation of funding to social programs is. Feminists understand the latter on an intuitive level, but this same intuition applied to the private sector leads to essentially cynical policies (pushed by well-intentioned useful idiots) which punish, e.g., male-dominated career fields. In both cases their tactics for effecting the desired policies are manipulative and treat people as means to "progressive" ends. They don't respect rationality o…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:22 PM
6

The woman was a pervert. They should search her computer for CP. "A thief believes everyone steals." Personally I'm suspicious of everyone who buys into pedo panic. They're definitely all a little repressed; most adults are attracted to 16-year olds and younger. I'm kinda the freak here, thank god, since I rarely go for anyone under 30 and didn't even have crushes my age before I was in college, nor was I sexually active or interested in experimenting. Like I said—I'm a freak, and it's to my ben…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:42 PM
0

He shouldn't have agreed to let them see his phone even if he had nothing to hide. Cops love breaking all property they can get their hands (or K-9 unit paws) on. Including property with a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:32 PM
5

I think it's a neonazi?
/r/MensRights18/10/15 04:05 PM
5

In a rather unwholesome display of subterranean feminist feeling, they call themselves the "Honey Badgers." I can't even get past this sentence. I mean what does "subterranean feminist" even mean? Literally I do not know. How much codeine did she take before writing this?
/r/MensRights18/10/15 03:49 PM
3

builders not destroyers. Ha! Hahahahahaha! HAHAHAHAHAUGHUAHACH hacks up lung Women, builders.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:26 PM
5

Now this is something I can agree with the (literal, self-identified) radfems on: I would llllooohooove to see them try to start their own utopia, relieve us of their annoying presence and liberate themselves from the products of the "patriarchy" (such as the power grid and medical science, for starters), and let us see how it goes. My prediction: they won't be lesbians for long, or even be able to tolerate other women after a few months of it.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 08:53 PM
1

Most MRAs, I think, would say it should be gotten rid of.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 01:16 AM
0

I don't know. I think we're really talking about getting rid of the Selective Services, right? I'd really hate to see a lot of MRAs endorse this for what I'd consider disingenuous reasons that feminists use to justify their tactics in undertaking "progressive" projects. ... The discussion on...making the age of consent eighteen instead of sixteen, was behind closed doors. The wives of some of the Senators and Assemblymen told us the discussion was positively unfit for us to hear.... Which all go…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 08:20 AM
1

Well it does look like a mouth sucking cock...
/r/MensRights10/10/15 10:11 PM
1

He obviously can't since time machines don't exist. But what does that have to do with anything? What does that have to do with transfer to and enrollment in another university? Obviously he should be reimbursed for the semester he wasn't able to finish, if he hasn't already, but that's such a tiny part of what the university should do to mitigate the damage it's done that it's practically an incidental bit of symbolism. I say this precisely because I understand how grave the injustice done to t…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 10:08 PM
0

Of course not. What's the relevance of that question?
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:12 PM
1

"Who cares about penalties?" You, evidently! Penalties are about the future; they don't exist in some sort of temporal bubble where they can't possibly make things better in a substantive way for future students. Penalties for an offense become precedent which tell universities what is and isn't an acceptable way to handle these cases and what consequences they can expect to face if they mishandle them. That's like 99% of the entire point of them, with immediate reparations to the injured party …
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:11 PM
5

Well, I definitely think paying damages is fair; I just don't see what relation their amount should have to costs that he'd basically have been paying anyway. (Unless he chooses a more expensive institute—but then what if he chooses a less expensive one?) More useful for the university that expelled him to have to somehow endorse his transfer to another one of his choosing. The best way I can think of for the university to acknowledge they were on the wrong side of justice, and try to mitigate t…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 09:02 AM
-9

They should face penalties but I don't understand why you say they should they pay specifically for his education elsewhere. Because he can't go back? Would it be reasonable for them to have to provide free education if he could go back? EDIT: This is an honest question about which sorts of penalties make sense and which don't. Why the downvotes?
/r/MensRights10/10/15 06:09 AM
2

Is this real life?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 07:01 AM
2

Ohhh, duh—my humor meter is a bit off. Yeah, Mad Men tell the broads, gals, dolls and other varieties of dame that they're inherently good as part of a tried-and-true time-honored formula for capitalizing on their naïve thirst for effortless validation. These dames, if they're of the "Feminist" sort, defend themselvea by claiming they're not rubes, they're just responding positively to being treated "equally" and "finally" receiving the same "cultural messages" that the boys do. Seems they've go…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:29 AM
2

Hmm? Seems like you're saying Levi's is promoting an idea that's the opposite of earning one's accomplishments (being considered badass) through hard work. But then you imply it makes you want to buy Levis. But I'm not sure you meant to reply to my comment at all.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 02:25 AM
1

If you research it, there's really no study that says anything positive about coeducation, but several that find pros to single-sex. (Yes, even in areas of socioemotional development which were always assumed—a priori—to show the primary benefits of coeducation.) So one day universal single-sex ed should be mainstream again. There is actually never been any evidence-based argument for coeducation. To paraphrase an old article I found on it, it was never considered as an experiment that might or …
/r/MensRights05/10/15 11:20 PM
5

Gynopticon [pan-op-ti-kon] noun 1. a space or society so arranged that all parts are potentially subject to the "female gaze" or supervision by women synonyms: femopticon, feminopticon
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:23 PM
2

Tragic what can come of men's need to give a fuck about the opinions of women who DGAF in return.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 05:36 PM
3

Lol maybe. We'll really never know. I'm sure there was no shortage of homos at any time in history. But I remember what made me decide to embrace my attraction to men, and it was basically shit that was going on in my older brothers' relationships.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 05:33 PM
1

Exactly. You get it, as does every man and everyone who cares about (especially straight) men. But most probably never will, andmen will continue to suffer because of it, because they're forced to deal with these stressors almost 24/7, even at school. Maybe not in sports, but you can't expect everyone to be an athlete. Am I crazy for thinking universal single-sex education at all levels would help tremendously?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 05:30 PM
2

Oh no not again. This is a corruption of lol.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:31 PM
2

I'd say a lot more than 10% of people on the whole, or of any given demographic, are shit. :)
/r/MensRights04/10/15 10:50 PM
8

You think you're joking but you never played Monopoly with my dad.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 10:50 PM
12

AHEM: Meanwhile in r/feminism: "Pathetic male loners get waaaay too much sympathy. Let's hate them more! Why can't everything be about my female self-esteem??"
/r/MensRights04/10/15 09:53 PM
1

I do believe that we men do have more potential for violence than women. I'd say we have the potential for more efficacious violence than women. A woman has fewer inhibitions when it comes to striking a man than a man does, precisely because her violence is rarely as grievous or dealt with as seriously. So women are in a sense more violent, but less (physically) injurious, and this is not due to any vice or virtue. The more interesting and pertinent fact is that we have the potential to be bette…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 08:14 PM
23

The thing is that these days, almost all pro-social behavior from men is almost purely altruistic (i.e. there's rarely anything in it for us to uphold our traditional functions), and is only negatively reinforced (i.e. if we don't do it we are constantly negatively sanctioned and if we do do it we are merely tolerated—the shame is temporarily alleviated). On the other hand, women are taught they can do anything a man can do and more, and praised for invading "boys' clubs" and redecorating, as it…
/r/MensRights04/10/15 07:39 AM
2

Tl;dr: They can't?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 09:57 PM
1

He said to use a dildo because no man would (should) want to fuck him, and there is no substitute for hot, meaty cock.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:01 PM
2

"sexual objectifucation" =/= "dehumanization".
/r/MensRights01/10/15 04:53 PM
7

Guys. It's all just penis envy. I can't believe you'd even be talking about some chicks with penis envy playing out their fantasies where masculinity is a fragile construct rather than a robust aspect of human nature. Remember these are the same people who talk about the confidence gap; them saying men have too much confidence in talking about shit (mansplaining and manterrupting) is simply the flip side of them feeling shitty for not having the balls to talk like men. They are also the same peo…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 07:32 AM
0

I've seen what sexual trauma in children causes and trust me it is worse than watching something happen to someone else. Categorically? This is always, necessarily so? Bull. Fucking. Shit. The concept that sexual touching naturally implies harm if experienced by someone before puberty is not intuitive to children themselves; it's not the case across cultures, and what counts as sexual touching isn't even identical across cultures. On the other hand every human who isn't a psychopath finds the si…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:51 AM
4

Of or relating to a problemat, which is the place you take your petty gripes to be laundered until they almost look like legitimate grievances.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:16 PM
1

Let's be realistic: I'm sure watching someone get beaten to death in front of her is orders of magnitude more traumatic for a child than being touched in her no-no place. And no, decades of indoctrination are precisely what tell us that these two offenders should be treated the same. Decades of indoctrination cause all thought to halt when we hear "child molester", so that it's not even permissible to ask whether we're talking about the kind of sick monster who rapes toddlers to within an inch o…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 10:45 PM
3

Women are innocent until the men who made them do it are found out.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:20 PM
9

Isn't that from Bill Burr?
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:12 PM
1

Bullshit. That's not why he died and you know it. You are defending a senicidal murderess who is the real public menace. Now you're covering your ass trying to take the unpopular (and insane) view that offending against minors should be a capital offense for women. Nobody thinks that. Your view that it should be one for men is pretty popular though. The moral majority doth protest too much on this issue. And you can hate men in the same way white knights hate men enough to beat them unconscious …
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:01 PM
2

Spoiler: they don't.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:53 PM
6

Nobody implied it shouldn't.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:47 PM
2

On a positive note, I'm like 99% sure all these conservatives wouldn't be freely admitting that video games are an art form if it weren't for crazy feminists. The pivotal role gamers have played recently in challenging the cultural authoritarians' narrative where others cave like gutless, empty husks, has garnered unprecedented respect from classical liberals as well as rightists who themselves might have criticized games and gamers as degenerate just a few years ago.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:42 PM
8

The word "problematic" always makes me laugh these days. Because it's always a complete joke when it's used. And lol @ "white feminism" now being synonymous with "disagreement with me by another feminist". That's apparently not problematic.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:28 PM
7

Well put. Feminists: on the front line in the war against boy cooties.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:18 PM
2

You wanna tell me you think those women who are on the front page of this sub everyday (the last one I recall had allegedly abused a boy upwards of 50 times) don't deserve to live? Bullshit. Everyone can see how insane that is. You don't have any information on what exactly this man did (decades ago). Which means you're just a man hater in denial.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:43 PM
2

The fuck doesn't she understand about the statement that men are killing themselves because they aren't getting to see their children? These aren't "deadbeats", unfit parents or fathers who "choose" their schedules with their kids!
/r/MensRights30/09/15 04:18 AM
3

She has even gone as far as telling me she would put a gun to my head to make me listen, and pinning me down while yelling in my face. Dude, that is way more than verbal abuse. That's assault, and a sign that she'll likely start consistent physical abuse. If she hasn't already. Honestly considering what you've mentioned in such a relatively off-hand way, she may be physically abusing you already and you just don't think of it that way or didn't mention it, especially if you find the hateful comm…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 03:36 AM
12

Please. White knights? Like they watch women's baseball. He'd be getting lynched by lesbos.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 02:29 AM
2

Fucking disgusting. Pedophile panic is as bad as pedophilia. I'd rather be fondled as a small boy than charged with "indecent assault of minors" as a man and have people like you conflate me with baby rapists and deny me my humanity. Which only happens with male offenders. Some MRA you are.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:31 AM
1

Ooooh! You just dropped the mic.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:20 AM
2

I think he was probably being sarcastic with the "Why start now?"
/r/MensRights29/09/15 11:57 PM
1

All 13 should get the sentence he was given.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 11:55 PM
4

What a fucking joke. There are no lengths some people won't go to to justify behavior by women for which they would demonize men.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 11:21 PM
-2

Good. Let them be scurred. They're scumbags. They're the kinds of pieces of shit who choke guys out at bars and then kick them while they're down for groping one of the gaggle of skanks they've brought out with them. They aren't just pathetic; they're a public menace.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 07:19 PM
2

White knights can be feminists you know.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 07:15 PM
1

Known women pedophile offenders are tolerated, and many praise them for fulfilling fantasies which they imagine boys universally hold. Men even suspected of pedophilia are treated horrifically. This can potentially be all men depending on the intensity of pedophile panic which someone holds.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 12:41 AM
3

Noo, it makes sense if you're starting from the assumption that fathers are more machine than human. Not weird; entirely consistent with culture.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 11:55 PM
19

One of the commenters says he was okay with "making" his wife push babies out from between her legs. Agency: 0, notion that women are mental children: 9,000+. How about "You keep your bodily autonomy, I keep mine"? Is that really so difficult for these fucking cucks and bitchtards to understand? What am I saying. Of course it is. Chances are nearly all of them think "American women prefer cut dicks" is a reasonable argument for neonatal circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 11:24 PM
3

Cults consider all heterodoxies to be their own refutations.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 10:55 PM
1

Okay well just look at the sheer material improbability of the scenario alleged to have led to this "rape" claim. The woman was swimming with friends who did not notice her get knocked unconscious, and the rescuer was someone who it is implied just happened to brush against her and yet knew that she had been under for "at least two minutes". And after "at least two minutes", she was still sinking and not quite to the bottom of the lake? And "A man saved my life but since he had to touch me to do…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 09:31 PM
1

I'm not a Christian (or religious), but how can you derive pro-life views from the Bible alone? I think that's a bit reductive, not to mention dismissive, alienating and counterproductive. People are either pro-life or pro-choice and people are either religious or not, and they impose the former views on the latter, conforming their interpretation of scripture to their moral worldview—not the other way around!
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:55 PM
2

Woo hoo! My state did something right!
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:34 PM
1

This is the best, most skillfully executed Poe I have ever read. Everyone butthurt over the "sensitive" subject matter is simultaneously missing the point and proving it: the feminist narrative has degraded the severity of rape to the point that life-saving, altruistic actions can very plausibly be criticized as rape under that narrative. "B-but someone might read this and then be scared of rescuing a drowning victim." Please. If you're upset by this masterful pointing out of narrative corruptio…
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:32 PM
1

Neat. We're pretty awesome! What else did we invent? Pregnancy and menopause?
/r/MensRights28/09/15 08:01 PM
1

Tl;dr: Feminism is fucking evil. "Psychopaths"? Takes one to know one see them everywhere.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 01:24 AM
0

Most especially not feminists. That's what their dismissive cry of, "Oh the poor menz!" is code for: "We don't give a shit about your humanity. It's your duty to care about ours!"
/r/MensRights28/09/15 01:20 AM
4

Feminist logic: "If I can conceivably psychologize it as stemming from malice, I have a right to respond with deliberate and overt malice, and call my actions justice."
/r/MensRights28/09/15 12:34 AM
1

Narcissism level: Dorian Gray.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:53 PM
2

Oh my god. Isn't urging the United Fucking Nations to go after Sargon of Akkad (e.g.) kinda "punching down"?
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:06 PM
4

"Yes, is this the men's Violence Helpline? I have violence and don't know how to get rid of it. It seems to have attached itself to my penis."
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:15 AM
2

#NotAllMRAs #NotAllMRAsGiveAShit
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:22 AM
5

You guys are SO easy to manipulate. They get you explaining away random people and justifying yourselves. You're already playing a losing game. Don't stoop to an idiot's level because they will beat you with experience. This should be top comment on every thread like this.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 09:28 PM
1

Lol do they seriously call Breivik an MRA? That's some Goebbels level bullshit right there.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 08:58 PM
1

Well yeah—again, on some clearly not-fully-conscious level—but I can't avoid them all. I certainly can't actively choose to avoid any problems except for those of which I am aware, and the problems of which I was aware were mostly my brothers' and peers'. Ergo... Anyway I have work in the morning. So good night.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:51 AM
2

Oh yeah, and on the other thing you mentioned: the chronologic gap between my oldest brother's birth and my youngest brother's birth is less than nine months greater than the gap between my youngest brother's birth and mine. Meaning there "should" (statistically I guess) be a much bigger effect seen in me than in any of my brothers, or else a much smaller one, depending on the direction of the correlation with chronological gaps between births.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:45 AM
1

Pride and happiness (or maybe I should more accurately say "contentedness") are not the same thing. I wouldn't say I'm proud of being "gay" (which is a political term I tend to avoid when possible). I'm just happy not to have some of the problems all my brothers have. I have my own problems though. Heh.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:32 AM
2

I think it's likely something like that. Oh well. Actually happy that this is how I turned out lol
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:59 AM
2

I sometimes wonder if he's really my full brother. >_>
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:57 AM
2

Actually with my palm on a flat surface my ring finger is at least a centimeter longer.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:51 AM
2

It's definitely a complicated and counterintuitive science—though I wouldn't dismiss it as pseudoscience. There's something to it...obviously the chemicals that account for the vast differences between the sexes should also account for some of the major differences within the sexes as well. I'm the youngest of four brothers and significantly taller than two of them. (Second oldest is tallest.) So that's interesting too!
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:47 AM
2

Right—intrauterine vs early-childhood vs pubescent vs postpubescent/artificial levels of androgen production/exposure have different effects (sometimes vastly different, which is why I don't think HRT makes trans people particularly good representations of the sex they identify with). But the "opposites attract" rule is, as I understand it, based on more than just prenatal testosterone levels, if it's even affected by them at all.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:40 AM
2

I get virtually the same result.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:34 AM
2

I don't know if this would address some of what you're wondering, but the whole "opposites attract" phenomenon of high-testosterone manly men going with high-estrogen girly women is something that's always fascinated me. It may reverse at a certain point, since there seems to be a subset of hypermasculine men who tend to like other hypermasculine men; or maybe it's a matter of personal interpretation, so that that attraction can be sexualized or else directed towards more pragmatic sorts of bond…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:25 AM
2

The front, since that's what the picture showed. And trying to keep my fingers perfectly straight and my palm flat. 2D's base seems to be a bit higher than 4D's (unlike the hand in the image) so the difference between their lengths is a bit bigger than it looks just eyeballing the finger tips.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:10 AM
2

Eyes. :p
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:21 AM
2

Haha yeah I'm big homo and I'd actually heard about the hypothesized connection with digit ratio years ago but my hands weren't "that way" so I was like wevs. My D4 is like half a centimeter longer than D2 but I have really long, slender fingers so the ratio might not be that much lower than 1.0.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 01:50 AM
2

Hmm well it's less than one. Not quite as low as in the picture at the top of the Wikipedia page. I've wondered about myself too, though. I was also diagnosed with ADD when I was little. But I've always prefered extremely masculine men which is mentioned as correlate of high ratios.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:34 AM
2

No, what gave you the impression I thought you were trolling?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:02 AM
3

It's totally their responsibility and the only ones capable of recognizing that are us "fanatical" MRAs. -_-
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:18 PM
2

I'm guessing you have Aspergers? Out of curiosity, are you trans?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:12 PM
2

I almost have to question how much we should criticize the most obvious examples of idiocy in gender studies. At a certain point we're just giving the enemy helpful advice on how to couch their bigotry in a more enduringly socially acceptable doublespeak. I can see them gradually, superficially capitulating to some MRAs' criticism so that in like ten years they can say, "Sure, we were sexist back then but you have to remember misogyny was at its worst ever"—because isn't it always?—"and we're ab…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:09 PM
2

Sure, a shift towards more statistically male biometrics would be expected with greater testosterone exposure in the womb, but that's a long way off from getting "it is thought they turned out female due to a genetical tolerance to testosterone". If they are anatomically female the tolerance to testosterone may keep them from having ambiguous genitalia, say, when it might have that effect on other embryos, but I find the phrasing that they "turn out female" because of that tolerance, to be...odd…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:59 PM
3

Even when you're patently too polite they get hysterical. "Optics is sexist! Let's nag the men until they change the laws of physics!"
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:39 PM
2

STEM = Science Technology Engineering Math I'm male. "Not like the other girls" is how Christppher Hitchens once described his friend Stephen Fry. I think it's probably a common euphemism for homosexual men so I threw it in as a joke. Now I feel like I've gone on about that too much. >< Anyway, are you saying some aspie women are chromosomally male and infertile?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:21 PM
2

Most men have this quality, particularly people with aspergers syndrome ( also known as hyper male syndrome). It has to do with testosterone exposure in the womb which changes the brain shape. Interesting as fuck! I have a female friend who's getting her Bachelor's in computer science and she was just diagnosed within the last couple years as an aspie. Once when I was talking to her about feminism and how it gets it all wrong on the nature vs. nurture question regarding sex differences, she said…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:58 PM
1

Women see the world so differently on average than men. I don't understand it. Sometimes I don't understand how some of them navigate 3-dimensional physical reality, like when I see them totally flummoxed by a mechanical task whose solution I would have assumed to be self-evident to anyone who can perceive objects in space. I'm not even being mean right now. It's genuinely baffling to me how some (actually a lot of) women (but no men as far as I've noticed) get around any better than if they wer…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:06 PM
1

Haha excellent. My oldest brother married a female psychology Ph.D but cannot stand working with women especially in his current Masters program. I kinda know how he feels from working with girls in group projects, where I end up having to take the lead and pull everything together at the last second and am met only with criticism for taking the lead when nobody else was doing shit. I guess I should say I'm met with passive aggressive resentment and only learn of the criticism through other wome…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:37 AM
4

Who couldn't say what now?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:15 AM
2

I agree it's all bullshit to say there's anything to be found in Islamic texts that should logically lead to more prejudice and oppression against women or homos (another other group these conservatives mention), than anything found in the other Abrahamic religions. Clearly there have been times when Christian civilizations committed some of the ghastliest crimes against humanity, including atrocities against women and against heretics and against homosexuals and against the disabled and the ins…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:08 AM
1

Have you ever actually watched ballet? How can an art which cannot exist without men taking part, be girly? Women could not conceivably replace these men, for both physical and aesthetic reasons. I know next to nothing about ballet but I know that much for a fact. Or are you talking about who enjoys the show more? I'm pretty sure most patrons of ballet are rich old men. There are beautiful women with skin-tight clothing involved. Yeah there are beautiful men with sinewy thighs and shapely asses …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:55 AM
1

This is so awful. I don't know how some people can be so evil. "Daddy doesn't love you"? I'm on the verge of tears of rage. No loving parent would tell their children that. She sounds like a narcissist and a sociopath. Typical though.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:02 AM
3

You have some good points. But it is hypocritical to give Islam a pass if you're going to rail on Christianity for what are, at worst, milder forms of the same attitudes regarding gender roles. And you could accuse their take on Christianity of the same sort of thing you accuse Crowder of when he talks about Islam, like when feminists complain about Paul's sexist comments on a married woman's place without noticing that he espoused what is essentially gallantry and pedestalization of wives, in t…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 01:39 AM
9

This is so typical that it isn't much of an exaggeration to say it's the universal experience of any man trying to have a real conversation with feminists, at least online. Feminists and SJW-types have built up a wall of ideological-immunity mechanisms. "I don't have to educate you"; "Nice mansplaining, dudebro"; "Now you're just 'sealioning'"; et cetera. Also see the AVfM's list of feminist shaming tactics. One which I think is particularly interesting (though I think it's not explicitly includ…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 01:18 AM
1

It would be easier to teach men to be more indifferent towards opinions which women commonly hold. It wouldn't require as much social engineering and backtracking since men already tend to be indifferent to things that we think don't rationally matter. It would just be a matter of showing that the preferences shared by the greatest number of women don't matter unless you're trying to simply maximize the quantity, rather than quality, of potential mates. Which is stupid. As things are, men are to…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:15 AM
2

Men will never be as prone to crying as women. It's just not physically as easy for us to do it. (Deeper tear ducts, less amygdala activity in response to pain, testosterone moderates emotions, etc.) I can definitely see this as ultimately just bolstering yet another hardline "nurture over nature" narrative that blames men for not being more like women.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:54 PM
2

"It's 2014, women are smart now." ~ Dave Skylark Don't know exactly why this made me think of that.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:41 PM
1

Feminist penis envy is delicious. Just like penises themselves.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:27 PM
3

God this thread is like every series of street interviews ever. "Maybe she tried to rape him and he was in the right. Or maybe she didn't and he was in the wrong. I don't know all the facts." Repeat twenty times.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:26 PM
5

I don't recognize any part of what you're claiming based on my experience at three different colleges over six years. Convincing someone to fuck by "smooth talking" them is, at any rate, not remotely the same as rape. And yes, you live and learn, and you can do that without being "too judgmental", so who gives a fuck if someone wants to judge you as judgmental because you don't want to fuck someone? Nobody with any sense or genuine judgment.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:16 PM
1

But if it is, that's empowering.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:06 PM
11

Directed by M. Night Shyamalan.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 11:01 PM
2

It's full of people who might have no idea what "MRM"/"MHRM"/etc. stood for before talking to feminists who tried to "shame" them for supposedly being these things called "MRAs", by virtue of their advocacy of gender heterodoxy. At least that's my story and it's one I've come across not infrequently. The greatest threat to feminists just may be their obsessive opposition to men's rights.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 10:58 PM
3

What "affects" one sex directly without "affecting" the other even indirectly? I think what you mean is we need to identify a gynocentric argument for whatever positions we take on any issue? I don't think that's possible on a great many issues, as a gynocentric take on some issues—circumcision or the draft, e.g.—can only ever fuel the status quo: either women's opinions on these issues are dictated almost exclusively by the status quo (more so than men's), or there really is a conflict where wo…
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:32 AM
11

We must save the girls from the benefit of having only female teachers who will grade them higher than the male half of their peers, because these girls all have single mothers now and need institutions, some of which are run by the state, to provide father figures!
/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:07 AM
2

Lol kinda incoherent but it's...got potential.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 11:14 PM
2

best case scenario, he gets anger management courses and community service, worst case, a few years of jail time, which would utterly ruin him and i'm afraid push him over the edge to suicide. Fuck this pisses me off so much! Best case scenario he's still treated as a rabid animal because of his penis. If he were a woman this case wouldn't get past "She's suicidal"—nor would it even if "she" (your friend's hypothetical female counterpart) had been as violent as the wife in this situation. You sh…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:02 PM
1

I love this book! And it's narrated from the point of view of a dog that wants to be a man—what's not to love?
/r/MensRights22/09/15 07:23 PM
7

That's pretty darn fuckin terrifyin.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 03:37 AM
13

We live in a society where law enforcement is the personal Gestapo of abusive cunts like this.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:21 PM
0

She was told she could have it all.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:15 PM
7

Shit, dude. Well, I'm glad you found the MRM (a movement that definitely takes these kinds of abuse seriously). I'm glad you're strong (apparently enough not to let your brother's crimes against your humanity destroy your belief in justice in the world). I wish neither had been necessary. Can't say much besides that...nothing that would mean anything. But I'm glad you're here and wanted to say so.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 04:23 AM
1

You mean something something prejudice + penis + power (but ignore redundancy in last two).
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:38 AM
10

Straight women also regularly sexually assault us at gay bars.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 10:42 PM
6

So? The cops did more than hit him twice so by your logic they overreacted even more. Bitch needed to learn not to start violence cuz you never know what could happen. Every man on earth, even the braindead bellends in uniform and the tards in the background, knows this. Women want to occupy the same spheres as men, they need to know too, or else what you have is an entire society where the police are the personal Gestapo of every woman who decides she wants to drink with the boys. Grossly unfai…
/r/PussyPass20/09/15 09:06 PM
1

Well, by acknowledging that it's such a tricky business and that utopian aspirations are shit because this just isn't a perfect world, we can at least see that it's not worth sending men to die in foreign countries to spread the "freedom" we have here, since there's no way the developing world is ready to have our values—which, again, don't exactly work as intended even for us—imposed on them. And that is at least the ostensible justification for many conflicts, which the public at large eats up…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:42 PM
5

Exactly. An overabundance of choices leads to most people experiencing less satisfaction with their choices.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 05:09 AM
2

Men invent shit. Women complain till men invent something better. Women take credit for the better invention until they find reasons to criticize it. The Circle of Life!
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:38 PM
4

The grass is always greener outside your gated community—in what you've always assumed is just a bigger, nicer gated community.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:22 PM
1

Really not a bad idea.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 06:18 PM
4

As you said—"reasons". They found them. EDIT: Found a good example: And the heterosexual role-playing indulged in, and still more persuasively, the contempt in which the younger, softer, or more "feminine" members are held, is proof that the actual ethos is misogynist, or perversely rather than positively heterosexual.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 06:08 PM
2

Found this post when I tried submitting the link myself. Maybe we can all take a break from indignation and despair and celebrate this for now.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 01:14 AM
4

There should be. This definitely deserves it!
/r/MensRights19/09/15 01:12 AM
10

Many "queer" feminists argue that gay male pornography perpetuates the oppression of women by recreating "heteronormative" power dynamics wherein the masculine dominates the feminine. Reductio ad absurdum of feminist principles, #9,001: gay porn is heteronormative.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 12:17 AM
2

He is pretty hot.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:26 PM
0

Also how is an ideology with "gal" in the title any more equal than one with "fem" in the title?? J/k
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:59 PM
1

But that's offensive! So it must be wrong! Seriously though, this is why I'm no longer even an egalitarian. Patriarchy ftw! Not enough of it these days, I always say.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:53 PM
25

Doesn't matter. Did math.
/r/PussyPass17/09/15 08:32 PM
2

During sentencing, it emerged that Thost-Hedge had experienced a troubled childhood, and had struggled with mental health issues and drug and alcohol abuse from a young age. Something which has definitely never been true of any male criminal ever. Men offend because privilege. Women offend because rough childhood.
/r/PussyPass17/09/15 08:31 PM
3

A histrionic feminist is posting shit in the men's room intended to ruin male friendships. Slap him. It's okay. Just do it.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:37 PM
2

I need homosexuality because there is literally no man on earth who would say yes to sex but then say he meant no.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:32 PM
1

A _____ exceptionalist isn't the same as an exceptional _____. He's not much of a homosexual exception.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:36 AM
5

Milo isn't an MRA. He's a brutally honest factual, positivistic cultural libertarian who would rather be wrong in the precise opposite way that most people are wrong, than be right. He probably secretly thinks everything that has allowed society to exist and thrive up to this point is bullshit, but he refuses to give into gloomy, misanthropic nihilism. His version of indulging his misanthropy is more lighthearted: he cheerfully identifies (and even overplays) the shitty and cruel realities of hu…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:33 AM
2

Well, look at the representation of married men among great thinkers and artists, compared to their representation in the population in the cultures in which they lived. I'd honestly be shocked if they weren't vastly underrepresented. Both the Italian and Harlem Renaissances were dominated by men who flouted the convention of exclusive heterosexuality (though by calling it convention I'm by no means saying it was purely arbitrary), and many of the most notable geniuses were downright reclusive a…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:02 AM
6

Well, there are and were plenty of men who accomplished great things and kept society going without being motivated by pussy. Milo would definitely agree here, strangely. He is a homosexual exceptionalist.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 11:46 PM
2

Or something.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:31 PM
7

Lmfaooooo! Pretty much. I remember this NPR segment a while back basically painting white women as the victims of their own neurotic racist (and misandrist, though that wasn't mentioned) fear of black men. This bitch was talking about how she's evah so liberal but when she sees black men using the sidewalk in front of her she moves to the other side of the street out of uncontrollable fear. Then this Ira Glass-sounding hipster cuckboy was commenting on how "tricky" the issue is but how you reall…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:07 PM
1

Ah yes, the "No true research participant" argument.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:33 PM
1

Glancing at some of their criteria for determining "Hostility towards men," it seems the questions they're really getting at is how misogynistic—according to feminist dogmatic definitions of the term—the respondents feel men naturally are. It is set up so that nonfeminists, who have a better grasp of biologically gendered (or maybe more accurately "sexed") human nature, are going to be more inclined on average towards "gender essentialist" answers: HM taps into resentment about men’s power relat…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:27 PM
7

Glad you asked. I should've linked to it originally. I'm mainly thinking of the "Facilitating Bias" section, but the whole thing is worth reading.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 06:56 PM
1

Because she is. A big dumb sloppy bitch. To be fair they both are.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:38 PM
0

Trufax but I'm not defending the boyfriend since he chose to defend the bitch.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:30 PM
12

A disproportionate number (if not most) of the wrongfully punished would be black. Feminism facilitating and encouraging racism yet again. I'm shocked, shocked.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:12 PM
12

He actually was making an accurate assessment of her emotional state. She confirmed she was upset by the tedious questions she had been getting. Not upset by his question, or at least not exclusively. In fact his question gave her an opportunity to humanize herself for the reporters who were only interested in extracting pointless information from her.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:38 AM
25

She is acting pretty fucking despondent here for having just won. Too much so for it to be purely down to fatigue. I would have probably wondered the same thing as the reporter. And he did get his answer, and it was a good, honest, substantive answer, I think, and enlightening because even though it was a bit rude it shows people that star athletes are people they can empathize with just like anyone else. It's a shitty human being who would turn this into a gender thing. This was an instance of …
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:36 AM
1

but solely based on her being a woman and wanting it to be a "guy-space" is not acceptable. Absolute horseshit. Illegal maybe, but unacceptable? No. Chic CEO for that matter should be granted the same freedom of association and exclusion. You aren't thinking critically, just buying into the same "Men and women should be the same and be together all the time for no reason" dogma of the femopticon.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 05:06 AM
1

Feminists to men: "Shut up about how our movement is hurting you so that we can explain to you why your lives are so fucked up!"
/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:09 AM
1

Prove it.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:05 AM
18

Postmenopausal old woman is getting into the hip new microaggression thing out of bitterness and delusion.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:15 PM
6

More for me. :)
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:29 AM
16

Women can't get off from being fucked by men, remember? /s
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:33 AM
2

Well then it's a good thing he was just a boy and she was much closer, developmentally, to being a woman than he was to being a man.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 08:31 PM
5

Or I don't think it's a criminal act and would expect teenagers on the whole to be expected to handle this shit better than seven-year-olds.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:40 AM
15

TIL a girl sexually assaulted me in first grade.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:16 AM
5

The author thinks the whinging part itself was warranted and empowering. She just thinks the cuntish abuse should have been kept to a private exchange.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:08 PM
3

Ah glad we got that cleared up. I thought it was a good article.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:39 PM
1

Shouldn't your daughter be evaluated for attachment disorders? What can you tell us about her personality? Is she/was she "normal" seeming before this? Like emotionally?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:33 PM
8

Lol holy shit both other subs removed this. "The demand for introspection—it burns us!" Anyway good on you for taking the first step out of a cult.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:25 PM
4

What did you find so "illiberal" about that article on free speech?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:19 PM
2

Well Urban Dictionary is SJW as fuck, first of all. I'm not saying that explains the hate. The mainstream media has made sure that a great many people's first exposure to the term "MRM" inaccurately associates it with Elliot Rodger.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:14 PM
2

Ooh, do me next SRS! NIGGERKIKEPAKIFAGGOT! ORIENTAL CHINAMAN!
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:50 PM
2

Is this image real or fake?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:42 PM
10

The saddest yay there ever was.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:41 PM
4

There is a discount for men but it's cancelled out by the "pay gap". /s
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:10 AM
2

You're always wrong except when that would make me wrong too.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:02 AM
3

"I mean, if there's 10 people that have been accused and under a reasonable likelihood standard maybe one or two did it, seems better to get rid of all 10 people," Polis said. Holy shit, he literally reversed Blackstone's formulation.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:55 AM
1

"Deconstruction" is Orwellian newspeak for "destruction".
/r/MensRights08/09/15 05:35 AM
5

Why would girls want to play a game with an almost 100% rate of brain damage (concussions or repeated trauma)?
/r/MensRights06/09/15 08:17 PM
0

0.<
/r/MensRights06/09/15 08:00 PM
1

As I like to say, "Sexism is a lack of BS."
/r/MensRights05/09/15 06:19 PM
8

Oh god this is ridiculous. It's literally an "existing in the presence of minors while male" charge. And what happens when a strange woman stops the girl for much more personal reasons? The man is reported. Fuck this.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 05:47 PM
–

Women of the same race, class and creed ARE tighter with each other than men of the same race, class and creed are. Ftfy. If you're going to talk about women's overblown in-group bias you can't stop at their sexism. Men's social groups are much more heterogeneous. Women tend to be far more prejudiced, surrounding themselves with sameness and fearing difference.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:37 PM
–

What does that mean?
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:25 PM
4

Woman offender? Informal social consequences are adequate substitutes for a criminal sentence. Male offender? Twenty years of prison rape! May society at large never again acknowledge his humanity!
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:18 PM
–

But holding women accountable for their lies would make real victims afraid of coming forward. /s
/r/MensRights31/08/15 11:05 PM
4

Quintessential feminine morality, if there be such, is relatively absolutistic because it develops in an evolutionary context where the hard choices regarding crime, punishment, life and death have been made by men, with women being shielded from these choices. That's why women tend not to be great at compartmentalizing their empathetic faculties very well in dealing with wrongdoers. It is laudable according to the effete slave morality of Christianity, which preaches unconditional universal lov…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:22 PM
1

"Ethics of care" = "Ethics of rationalizing special treatment of women by people demanding 'equality'".
/r/MensRights30/08/15 09:13 PM
1

You clearly intended, like, three puns there.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:47 PM
2

DILF with a sexy, sexy heart. She's an idiot for leaving/losing him.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 08:28 PM
1

Just to be clear I don't mean "womanly" when I say "unmanly". I guess I mean it's (self-)dehumanizing, because they're either showing a lack of self-worth and self-respect or are perpetuating a lack of esteem and respect for more self-defined manhood. As far as I can tell they're literally worth nothing, as alphas, in themselves, but instead have their alpha value defined in relation to women whom they value much more than the same women value them. As far as I can tell, PUAs just unquestioningl…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:51 PM
–

Whether or not they care is beside the point. Obviously they don't give a shit what anybody thinks, other than specific women whom they want to fuck and whom I'd imagine they (PUAs) think they're "manipulating" when the opposite is the case. I'm just pointing this out because it's objective fact, not because I expect PUAs to care (until they face the same consequences as any man would for presuming the power dynamics in heterosexual hookups to be the reverse of what they really are).
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:32 PM
–

That's like defining oneself as alpha based on number of Facebook friends. It's a popularity contest, and frankly, it's unmanly.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 05:05 PM
–

Interesting angle. This is what I never understood about "alphas" who define themselves by their success with women. Isn't defining yourself based on the approval of women sorta the definition of...not being an alpha? I dunno. I think there's a lot of this "theory" I just don't get or haven't looked into enough to understand.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:05 PM
1

That's like saying anyone who isn't a paranoid schizophrenic is in no position to speak on Reptillians.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:04 PM
1

I don't like acronyms because they give the connotation of militancy (especially three-letter acronyms ending in A). I'm not a "Redpiller" because I was never in the Matrix, as it were, and I always thought feminism was a repugnant, culturally dominant force even during my own blind flirtation with being a perpetually offended "aggrieved minority". It was just self-evident that the pedestalization of women drove a disproportionate amount of social change.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 09:21 PM
–

They probably aren't ignorant of the race angle or even ignoring it. As I've said dozens of times for dozens of reasons concerning dozens of years of feminist rhetoric, policies, laws, etc., feminists are fucking racist. You think they don't know what their psychoanalytical theories of men's behavior look like when applied to the behavior of men in racial minorities? It's such an obvious connection they have to make a conscious effort to avoid making it explicit, but you'd have to be extremely n…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 08:01 PM
3

Black men. So entitled, 'mirite? /s
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:50 PM
–

Complains about lack of emotional literacy in males. Psychologizes their actions through the lens of emotionally illeterate theory.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:47 PM
–

I don't have the words to express my anger at this. I just hope she fucking dies. Soon. (A hope isn't a threat or incitement.) What a vile cunt. Playing with men's reputations like a cat with a bauble. The world needs to be purged of such psychopathy.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:47 PM
2

"When I talk about crossing the line from criticism to hate speech, I'm talking about when you start saying 'someone's kind doesn't belong here, and we'll all be happy when they're gone.'" Hate speech now covers characterizing members of a particular ideology as displaying flamboyant hair colors and/or jewelry. If they want to make an argument that this creates a hostile work environment...I mean, now all the blue-haired, pierced-nosed feminists at Mozilla will know somebody has said these downr…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:27 AM
–

Seriously, what a fucking cuck. My god. Please tell me this guy's mangina is as easy for everyone else to spot beneath his thin veil of trendy neomasculinity, as it is for me. Yeah, he's clearly speaking from his authentic experiences as a man, rather than speaking for some feminist bimbo who has intellectually cuckolded him. /s It's embarrassing. Remember, if there's one group that knows if you're bullshitting about being a fucking man (saying we dictate how we're treated, e.g.), it's going to …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:34 AM
6

One word: penis envy. Sorry. Two words.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:33 PM
3

My god Sargon of Akkad just might literally be Sargon of Akkad. That beard. That aura of absolute authority. <sup>Those</sup> <sup>eyes</sup> ^<sup>notice</sup> ^^<sup>me</sup>^^^<sup>sempaiii...</sup>
/r/MensRights27/08/15 05:10 AM
12

See, I see all this shaming of men for having sexual preferences and see it as no better and fundamentally no different from the shaming of men for having sexual preferences. Oh, I'm sorry, did that end up being tautological? I think the first time I wrote the phrase "shaming of men for having sexual preferences," I was thinking about men who prefer certain types of women today, and the second time I was talking about men who preferred men in the '90s and before. Tell me again how it's unaccepta…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:05 AM
–

They should add "pussypass" next.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:38 AM
1

the abuse female cyclists get is real As opposed to fake abuse that men get, because it's only real if there's a sexist reason for it, and it's always and *only** when the person targeted by it has bewbies, that there is a sexist reason for it. *Logical phrase here; try not to get too confused, feminists. Think it through.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:45 PM
1

Wow, you can just feel the compassion for the "risk" these innocent boys are facing. Fuck these women. They are about as compassionate towards boys as rapists are towards their victims. In fact I'm sure there are rapists with a lot more compassion for their victims than the average feminist has for men. They spout hate speech against half the species like it's normal, like they're just "righting a wrong" because they've been told everything men have thought and said about women historically has …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 05:23 PM
–

It's a good thing we have feminazis like this to resolve centuries-old disputes about how to define the greater good in a utilitarian context. This is the sort of bullshit that led to lynching black men and could still be used for scapegoating members of hated minorities at random in racist societies if it could prevent race riots (which would at least have the potential to lead to progress instead of protecting an evil status quo). I can't believe how pretentious this stupid fuckwit is. How is …
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:17 AM
1

Whoah. I just looked up Munchausen by proxy and that's pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:42 AM
1

Why not?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:13 AM
6

I take your point, but his sexual orientation is more than incidental to his ability to disrupt the feminist narrative in the ways he does. It could plausibly be called an example of gay privilege.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:22 AM
2

Some dude named Isaac McCasin once wrote, "[Girls] are born already bored with what a boy approaches only at fourteen and fifteen with blundering and aghast trembling." Yeah. Not always I guess!
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:27 AM
2

Yeah. No. That ain't gonna work on me. I'll just fart louder.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:26 AM
4

Prosecutor: Mom, not legal system, to blame in sons' deaths ¿Por que no los dos?
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:05 AM
1

I favor separation and distance from the queer separatists for myself. I'm a bit of an assimilationist. Though, like Milo, I'm a gay exceptionalist, I don't see how that's incompatible with playing along with rules you consider stupid, though not oppressive.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:53 AM
1

I may be biased as the op, but I say it's not at all too late. This topic is still fertile ground for analysis of the roots and actions of gender feminism, as attacking male-dominated cultures and spaces relates directly to every gender-feminist project. Gender quotas, the takeover of drinking establishments, "cultural criticism" of geek fandoms, "safe spaces" for every group except "straight cis males" etc. These projects have all been about one thing, and that's undermining "patriarchy" at wha…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:01 PM
–

Add in the fact that black males could find out at any time that part of their oppression comes from being male and that a whole lot of feminist criticisms of white males apply even more to black males, and you can see how it's actually very difficult for them to control their narrative. More than that, I think, they arguably have a rational incentive for keeping black males discriminated against primarily because of racism. The more racism the better because they can use it in their narrative t…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:23 PM
2

Way to be a moralizing, red-herring-throwing prick but women fucking do need to be taught drinking responsibility. They have lower tolerance and stupid reasons for drinking around men, like lowering their sexual inhibitions. (Men mostly just wanna dull the pain.)
/r/MensRights24/08/15 09:08 PM
1

I sincerely wish you good luck on that. Though my inebriation at the moment is most likely at least partially responsible for the sincerity of that wish. It would also be great if "gender fluid" women could resist starting a movement where they flip their switches to butch mode and try to march into all-male orgies to make obnoxious points about gender theory. Just a thing I can totally see happening.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 07:03 AM
–

"The women's movement could be viewed as a subversive to the entire younger New Left and revolutionary movement as they have proven to be a divisive and factionalizing factor...It could be well be recommended as a job for a counter-Intelligence movement to weaken the revolutionary movement." I don't know anything about this conspiracy theory (this is my first time hearing these points), but the quote above is so accurate and so plausibly representative of motives the FBI might express if they we…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:48 AM
–

Where are you getting these interpretations of what is being said? The question in its very broadest form is whether drunk sex is ever not rape; the question whether women should live in constant fear of rapists doesn't remotely fall into that discussion. But since you brought it up: Yes you watch your drink when you're at a bar. I don't care who you are, if you think leaving your drink unattended is acceptable you are a moron, and while I don't say you'd deserve whatever might come of that, I w…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 04:21 AM
–

Did you know that we're constantly "gaslighting" women? Whenever we fail to perfectly intuit why they're expressing a given emotion in a given situation, it is secretly an effort on our part to undermine their sanity. Did you also know that complimenting women in public is a malicious tool for "controlling their bodies"? Did you know that's rape culture? That rape is a tool which all men use to control and oppress all women by keeping them in a constant state of fear? That's right, all of women'…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:50 AM
–

Feminists care more about protecting black men than they do about protecting white women? Please. That's ridiculous. Almost every law and policy they champion affects black men even worse than white men. There's the narrative they've helped construct about "deadbeat" dads and the punishments for them (as ProblenaticReality pointed out); their narrative about DV; their denial of the assumption of male disposability (without which it's impossible to adequately understand gang violence); and of cou…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:37 AM
–

I really wish I could say there were any specifically "gay male spaces" to speak of, outside seedy anonymous-sex-oriented inns and bath houses which straight guys wouldn't be interested in visiting. I think the queer separatists want it that way.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:42 AM
2

It's like McCarthyism in the '50s: an open conspiracy against some social bogeyman du jour. Just as McCarthyism scapegoated homosexuality as a "fellow traveller" of Communism and purged hundreds of homos/suspected homos from public positions, feminism scapegoats male homosocial interactions as the source of all their social bogeymen, such as rape culture, toxic masculinity, institutionalized misogyny, and even patriarchy which is itself ostensibly taken as the source for all these other things. …
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:31 PM
2

Gets raped by a woman. "Well, if it helped her boost her self-esteem I guess that's really the highest purpose a lowly man like me can serve." Doesn't sound too far off from how some guys are told to think. Anyway, that link you provided reminded me of the whole episode when certain gay bars particularly badly plagued with bachelorette parties started banning them (just the parties, not even bachelorettes per se, let alone all straight women) and everyone from conservatives to Jezebel writers st…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:14 PM
2

And "gender fluidity" is definitely more a metaphysical/spiritual belief than an actual part of one's nature imo.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:30 PM
2

She even called it MGM while defending it. -__-
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:21 PM
–

Yes, there are a number of news stories and such about gay clubs being overrun with straight women sexually assaulting the gay men Wow, really? Could you please link to one? I don't think I've seen even one of these, even though I myself have been sexually/otherwise physically assaulted by strange straight women at gay bars multiple times. I've only ever read (on every pro-feminist website I can think of) about how gay male culture is supposedly "misogynistic" and gay men sexually assault straig…
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:20 PM
5

Oughtta be. ;)
/r/MensRights23/08/15 05:16 AM
1

Thanks! :)
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:36 AM
–

Well they can be gender fluid in their gender-fluid spaces.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:30 AM
–

I don't know about proper studies/surveys but I wasn't meaning to sound like I was guessing. I thought I'd remembered learning that the overlap between subscribers to this sub and lgbt subs is higher than it would be expected to be if there were only as large a proportion as in the general population. There are also a ton of gay AVFM contributors. EDIT: Too lazy to search for that(/those) source(s) now though.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 04:26 AM
7

Do you honestly think this is progress or that progress can be made with Jezebel? Sociopathy is a prerequisite for writing for them. Don't ever take a thing they say at face value. They're run by Gawker which means they are complicit in the most vile and malignant forms of commodification and genuine depersonalization of both male and female celebrities (and others) that pop culture has ever produced, and yet they act like we must never "objectify" women. In short they have less than no credibil…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 10:19 PM
4

Also there are men like me who find self-loathing straight male feminists utterly contemptible and spineless as they generalize our entire sex and claim to have privileges which every gay man knows he hasn't got, or that women are disempowered when every (self-aware) gay man knows that their control over men is enviable.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 07:33 PM
–

To be fair, there's a good chance we homos are overrepresented among men's rights advocates, too. A species that's peculiarly affected by sexist laws and attitudes is probably more likely to take an interest in one side and/or the other of the issue (or to try to reconcile disparate positions to whatever extent possible).
/r/MensRights22/08/15 07:31 PM
3

The gay rights movement was supposed to be the first successful men's rights movement, until it was coopted by feminism. I kinda discuss this in detail here. The entire topic is about feminism vs. male homosociality generally. I compare this to McCarthyism vs. homosexuality.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 07:11 PM
1

Have you been paying attention to what some of these fucking faggots have been saying about gaybros? Just search "Huffington Post gaybros" and watch the effete gender-loathing fem-supremacist faggotry begin. I mean I'm not a supporter of r/gaybros anymore because it was overtaken by this bullshit and the mods are completely misguided and don't make the most perfunctory effort to discourage invasions from gbcirclejerk, so the whole place is generally a cannibalistic orgy. But it was a legitimate …
/r/MensRights22/08/15 06:36 PM
–

Tell me about it. I disagree with my fellow homos way more often than I agree with them, but the real difference is I try to say, "Look, that's not how freedom of association works," or something reasonable like that (like in the case of the pizza shop owners), rather than making retarded emotional arguments about how only </=5% of the population are the only people who "get to" have opinions on certain things because those things are "matters of life and death for me. [Collapses on fainting cou…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 06:28 PM
1

That's fair. On the other hand, I'm not in the business of helping feminists to stop spouting loony, solipsistic bullshit. That propensity rather helps my case. Edit: I haven't downvoted you fyi.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 05:39 PM
6

"Men and masculinities" is a women's studies class at my uni. -_-
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:43 PM
3

I don't know that I've heard that particular argument, but it would be nice to have a feminist article on that to tie the op to this issue. Otherwise this really just looks like hating on women. EDIT: Not arguing there aren't plenty who say/believe that, btw. But citations would be helpful.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:34 PM
–

Don't just "find it offensive", then. Argue against it. Use your words, your reasoning faculty. Mansplain it to the myriad borderline-personality patients pulling this shit up from their latest dives into their vaginas.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 09:25 PM
1

Feminists should be called brown recluses because they eat their own so frequently.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:42 PM
–

What would that have to do with men's rights unless men were being blamed for pollution in the dominant narrative?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:53 PM
7

Liquids besides water also wet, survey finds.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:41 PM
2

Are you saying feminists haven't already been talking about nude-photo leaks/revenge porn as something that only affects women?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:27 PM
–

Lol since when has the fact that men are more often the victims of anything than women, ever kept feminists from controlling the narrative on it. Aww...I just made myself sad...
/r/MensRights21/08/15 05:26 PM
1

Let's be honest: men are more heterogeneous. This sucks balls for the men on the "good" ends of population distributions. E.g. men are categorically labeled stupid even though they are at least as overrepresented among geniuses as among, say, Darwin Awards recipients. It's not PC to talk about men's disproportionate contributions, only their disproportionate failings. The men who are among the most principled and socially conscientious of citizens get reamed by people's fear of all men. It's not…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:16 PM
2

The Onion gets us, you guys!!!<sup>They</sup> <sup>get</sup> <sup>us.</sup>
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:53 PM
2

Patricar keys.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:49 PM
1

No, they refer to the same exact thing but sociologists who examine the social component of such disorders call them sociopaths whereas psychologists, who are interested in the psychological etiology and psychiatric treatment of these disorders, call them psychopaths. So if anything someone describing someone as a psychopath would be more interested in his deadened emotions, lack of empathy, dysfunctional risk assessment, etc., whereas a sociologist would call him a sociopath and look at the ant…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:22 PM
1

Perhaps this is just as minor a gripe but it sounds absurd to me when people say "born a man" or "born a woman". Babies are not men or women.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:19 PM
0

I said that I had known numbers of women teachers since the 1970s who had made no secret of favouring girls – on the grounds that it was a feminist duty to repair women’s historic educational and social disadvantages. Typical. Men make the system that seems logically optimal to them at the time. Women are left out of certain areas until, as the men begin to allow them in, the women develop a mythology that holds that men acted with malice in making a system that fails to advantage women in all a…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:15 PM
1

Yeah something practical and hands-on like robotics would be more helpful for boys. But I mainly was suggesting it's inherently unfair to hold boys and girls to the same educational standards.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 07:02 AM
–

Fascination with evolutionarily novel experiences is a trait to which high-performing intellects are especially prone, whereas made-up stories provide one of the oldest forms of entertainment. So when formal education has the result of punishing tendencies of high intellects while rewarding tendencies of mediocre intellects I'd definitely say it's uncool. I'd also say it's damaging and ought to be burned down as a system and rebuilt from the ashes, with perhaps less ability to permanently fix th…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 05:13 AM
–

the culture around boys is that school isn't cool Maybe that's how they articulate it, but do you think thar that explains any real difference between boys and girls or do you think they say that because they are legitimately being reamed by the educational system's hostility towards maleness and they just don't happen to be expressing the problem in such self-conscious terms? It isn't as though academic performance is "cool" to girls; its standards are just directly geared towards them. Also yo…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:10 AM
–

Isn't saying "Boys think they're too cool for school" pretty damn dismissive of even the possibility of legitimate concerns being raised about boys finding school fundamentally hostile to their maleness? All of what you say could be dismissed in the terms used in this article.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 03:56 AM
1

Nothing like an uber-posh accent talking about how its owner has been grievously wronged by society.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:41 PM
–

Oh god why did I read the comments? This is a sexist editorial that dismisses the safety of women, primarily, with children in the mix as collateral damage, all dressed up to look like civil rights advocacy in order to appeal to critical readers. It falls short by failing to suggest that we instead keep the true sex offenders (not the frequent example of an 18-year-old with a 15-year-old girlfriend) in jail for the remainder of their natural lives. If males were more frequently victims of rape, …
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:56 PM
7

"Social contract" being code for "A set of coercively enforced responsibilities and not actually a contract in any sense", as it usually is?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:33 PM
5

No, so long as the fraud is on the woman's part.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:29 PM
-17

OH FUCK CRYING OUT LOUD! Trying to work on a swearing problem, I take it?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:15 PM
–

To be fair affirmative action is unjust, patronising and just plain stupid, but their reason for opposing it only now that men sometimes benefit and women sometimes suffer from it (whereas they would gleefully welcome the reverse) is fucking disgraceful.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:13 PM
10

Feminist women lash out at nice guys because they find them unattractive, period. Deliberately bad, overwrought psychoanalysis of their frustration as stemming from "entitlement" is really all they can resort to because the only alternative is for them to confess that they do not and cannot want the type of respect from their partners that they claim to want. They can't escape their nature; they know they crave at least a moderate dose of what they call "misogyny" in their relationships, but the…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:03 PM
–

Oh, wouldn't it be nice if feminists couldn't be teachers?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 11:15 PM
–

I love how stupid they are for thinking that men will naturally find the best pro-feminist arguments by independent research. That's a horrible way to sell a conspiracy theory!
/r/MensRights15/08/15 09:42 PM
10

Or, Feminism to Men: "I Hate You—Don't Leave Me!" Or, How Male Feminists are Masochists, Must Enjoy Having Abusive Cunts Stomp on their Balls
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:49 PM
2

Lol. If she were an American feminist she'd be all, "Well sorry I'm not a 'perfect victim' and I told him I actually wanted it. Sorry I don't match your patriarchal view of how a rape victim 'should' act. You know there are women who have woken up in the morning after a rape to make their rapist breakfast!"
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/15 05:18 PM
1

Quid in inferno agatur?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:22 AM
5

That's potentially every single man on earth. Just between "neckbeard" and "fedora" you're either grossly insensitive or cloyingly chivalrous. I'm gay and even I can detect women who think like that. They give you a "You're unworthy of looking at me" look if you even happen to glance in their direction. You either look too interested in them, or you're dissing them by not noticing how clearly beautiful and magnificent and unique and brilliant and perfect they are. And they'll let you know it wit…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:04 AM
3

Surely putting it like this just points up the idiocy. Men are already taught not to be wolves, but the fact that there are wolves out there makes it insanely, recklessly idiotic to insist girls not be "taught not to be Red Riding Hood". Seriously did they read that story?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:15 PM
2

lmfao the way she fell. "It's like one of my Japanese animes!"
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 09:53 PM
1

Oh puh-lease. If he'd wanted to "rock her", she wouldn't be fucking conscious by the end. Only reason she didn't hit harder is because he took control of her dominant fist after she threatened him with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 09:43 PM
1

The gay population, on average, has become dumber as we've gained acceptance, and there can be some pretty stressful social consequences for refusal to become part of the hive-mind.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 09:19 PM
1

Based 'Mo.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 08:50 PM
1

Not to acknowledge his divinity would be blasphemous. Milo Yiannopoulos is institutionalized sexism incarnate! Kate said so herself!
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 07:05 AM
7

And now she can pull out the "I've experienced assault!" card whenever she's arguing about feminist bullshit with a reasonable person and is backed into a corner by his oppressive man-logicking.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 06:08 AM
0

I almost felt sorry for her. I've never almost felt sorry for someone like that. I mean it's not like he was shouting her down; there were plenty of awkward silences where she could've defended her views but just couldn't. Never seen something so fucking awkward. lmfao
/r/MensRights14/08/15 01:47 AM
17

All of them including the heckler. And about a tenth of the men.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/08/15 01:16 AM
2

Me too. That's the problem here.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:29 AM
3

I think that some obviously incompetent, indignant, up-in-arms administrator would work at least as well in this case. Extended version: "CASE DISMISSED! You may now sensitively inform the spectators in the safe space of the ruling."
/r/MensRights13/08/15 03:15 AM
–

as many or more Cute. I literally hadn't even reached puberty when I first noticed the obvious fact that nobody really wants to see women die or be brutalized on screen even in shows where men die by the dozens/hundreds/thousands. Killing or even seriously endangering a female character is basically a last resort for advancing the plot when even the director notices how stale putting men through the meat grinder has gotten. "Women in refrigerators." Ha. My ass.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 10:51 PM
–

What makes people think that doing this via text is going to work? I call bullshit on this, actually. You'd have to be not just a psycho, but incredibly fucking stupid to pull shit like this.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 10:46 PM
1

Well, that's valid enough not to be worth arguing with further. If someone says, "I know [x] when I see it, and this is/isn't an example of [x]," there's really no universal way of arguing against that.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 10:44 PM
1

If you go out and get blackout drunk and want sex and beg someone to fuck you and later decide that was gross, only an idiot would consider that to be similar to having a binding contract pushed on you while intoxicated. So all you're telling me is that the law is retarded when it comes to understanding human psychology and experiences. Again, contracts are sophisticated human inventions, and every adult human cannot be expected to intuit, no matter how inebriated, all the repercussions of signi…
/r/MensRights12/08/15 10:30 PM
–

I'm just really not getting into the "sex is a contract" thing. It's a desire, an appetite. To call it contractual is like saying sex is a computer program: an absurd conflation of primitive human nature and sophisticated human invention.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 04:25 AM
3

Right, you are just as free to have drunk sex as you are to pretend it was rape afterwards and have everyone believe you.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 11:52 PM
–

So the manosphere is wherever certain terms are found at the right frequency? At what frequency? Lots of communities that should definitionally be considered part of the manosphere have a predominant aversion to the shibboleths of other parts; some, like bodybuilding communities, have entirely distinct shibboleths. Is it an "I know it when I see it" thing?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:42 PM
–

It's not that the law says "if you're drunk you're responsible for your actions", rather it says "we cannot excuse criminal activity because of drunkeness". Those are literally the same. "Responsible" means "capable of being held to account for one's actions." The only alternative is to say those actions can be excused. Fucking law making distinctions where they don't exist, as usual. Anyway I think we need only look at drug policy to see that the justice system (cough speaking of misnomers) tho…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 09:41 PM
2

People like that commie bitch are the shittiest pieces of shit on the planet. Trust me. I have plenty of occasion to block fucking psychos who invite their friends to virtually shout me down on Facebook for crimethink or for correcting something that they hold as gospel, who refuse to justify themselves and who get automatic support no matter what they say or how they conduct themselves. These fucking narcissists like the hypocritical, white-guilt-ridden, effete college liberals of my generation…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 08:34 AM
–

Men making groups online catering to their interests is as unnecessary a phenomenon to label as is men forming men's groups in real life. They're merely manifestations of homosociality, almost entirely distinct from each other and connected only by something as fundamental a part of culture as is language itself. Add to that the even more unnecessary bit of conflation in putting sites which are merely about men's issues, into the same category as virtual men's spaces. And that is precisely what …
/r/MensRights10/08/15 06:26 AM
2

What was the point of that url? First let me point out that the Greek for man as in a male adult isn't homo (the LATIN for man/human), but anēr, so this isn't to say that that's even a trustworthy source, but it does kinda support what I was saying. Nobody seems to know the origins but if you look at who assigns validity to the use of the term to describe everything from bodybuilding to GG to MGTOW to PUA, it doesn't seem to be actual bodybuilders, GGers, MGTOW, PUAs, etc., but mainstream leftis…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:32 AM
–

You actually, unironically use the term "manosphere"? I was pretty sure that was invented by feminists who assume that mixed-sex discourse on mixed-sex issues is the natural default rather than something that has to be artificially forced, and that all places where men talk about man things are sociologically remarkable and interrelated.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 12:49 AM
1

I don't really know anything about this "Laughing Witch" but after watching her video about Sargon's FB page I have to wonder if she's ever laughed in her life.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:18 PM
7

They don't just call it "reverse sexism", they call it "'reverse sexism'"—using scare quotes around their own term. The doublethink is strong with these ones.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 11:03 PM
1

How is open discourse natively "testosterone-driven"? I didn't remotely say it was. I didn't define open discourse as testosterone-driven; I qualified the term "open discourse" with the term "testosterone-driven", referring to a subcategory of open discourse found in coffeehouses during the Age of Enlightenment, e.g., or in the Cambridge University Moral Sciences Club. If you're going to say that aggression is, I would argue that debate or discourse doesn't have to be aggressive. That doesn't ch…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 06:44 AM
1

When she's talking about the fragmentary nature of those women's groups (gay black women wanting to separate from the black women's group, gay Jewish women wanting to do the same, women with allergies, etc.), that is the homogeneity-seeking nature of (unrefined/unmitigated) femininity. Women tend to seek out familiarity and agreement as much as men seek out novelty and debate (a form of competition but also a necessarily cooperative process of creating further novelty, viz., new ideas).
/r/MensRights04/08/15 07:10 AM
–

I think this is an effect of men being "actors." i.e., Men choose to take an action, and women passively exist and have circumstances inflicted upon then. Yeah I don't really understand how feminists can believe this (which they clearly do on the whole, despite their sophistry), and yet not be in favor of absolute sexual segregation (or something as close to it as possible). Who knows? Maybe they secretly are; they'd never admit it. But I mean it's not the smartest thing to force constant intera…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:21 AM
–

In that it involves closeted homosexuals and...well that's really it. Must be a really novel concept to you if that's the connection you immediately make lol
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:21 AM
–

She should just admit already that the problem is inherent in the assumptions underlying coeducation. There is no way to force the sexes together in universities without running amok of free speech. It will always be a biological inevitability of gender integration of educational institutions because women on the whole are so terrified of and antipathetic to testosterone-driven open discourse.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:23 AM
1

It was just an abysmally poor strategy on her part. She tried using sultry schoolmarm censure (a dick-seeking attack) on a gay type. That's like using fighting moves on a ghost type. (Males can't learn dick-seeking attacks, even gay-type males.) Of course she's obviously a hag type, so his GBF counter was super effective.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:37 AM
2

She's gotta know she'd be barkin' up the wrong tree, though.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:24 AM
1

And all I did was post another if Milo's articles as a reply to your hero worshipping comment. Nope, all you did, as you made clear with your last comment, was inject your weird, all-consuming, secondhand-sob-story-motivated, unqualified vendetta against circumcision into an unrelated discussion when your only intention all along was to reductively call out and dismiss actual personal experience as unacceptable bias; and badger me for cited evidence of harms which are obvious to any male, while …
/r/MensRights03/08/15 06:08 PM
1

What the fuck does that have to do with anything? Yeah what the fuck do unrelated forms of MGM have to do with the discussion at hand?? It just kawn-fownds the conversation when people "dredge up" irrelevant crap, doesn't it? Thanks for making my point for me!
/r/MensRights02/08/15 05:31 AM
1

Well I mean, that's you. "That's, like, your opinion, man."
/r/MensRights02/08/15 05:27 AM
–

Also, ironically, through genital mutilation of all sorts from subincision, circumcision, urethral perforation etc. BTW. Apples to oranges. You want to know what I'm more opposed to than either medicating children with stimulants or cutting off their foreskins? It's another form of MGM: removing the penises of infants with ambiguous genitalia (who are often chromosomally male). Basically any medical procedure or regimine (includes medical ADHD treatments) inspired by a poststructural understandi…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:38 AM
–

Also, cut it with the damn hyperbole What hyperbole, specifically? Do you really believe that what you call "[...] pathologizing their natural cognitive and socializing styles and trying to practically chemically lobotomize them [...] is done in bad faith? No, people speak in all good faith when they pathologize maleness and that is the problem. They can rationalize pathologizing their sons in the context of the way society works these days (but to the point where they think dangerous drugs are …
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:08 PM
1

It's relevant to the assertion directly to the contrary—viz. that intellectual opposition to neonatal MGM is "fringe"—found in Milo's article. Did you read the whole thing?
/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:48 PM
2

It depresses me that feminists take advantage of the stoicism men are expected and inclined to display, just to whine about things which men will nod at noncommittally in an attempt to get them to stop making noise. For the most part men have their own, immediate concerns, and in focusing, justifiably, on those, they let narratives which they consider inconsequential—battles which they don't deem worth fighting—become totally out of hand so that they actually do affect their day-to-day concerns.…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:13 AM
–

Perhaps being gay is a disadvantage here: It is. I wouldn't dare speak on the so-called "body-positive" movement of feminism because honestly I have zero intuitive grasp of what straight men want in women, and zero interest in women's body-image issues unless a specific girlfriend of mine is confiding in me and I can deal with it on an individual level. I don't pay enough attention to it to know how much of the "body-positive" movement is just frumpy, ageist cows telling girls not to have health…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:07 AM
1

"I'm a Kansan trapped in a campy British man's body and I insist you recognize me as such!" EDIT: Other way around. >.<
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:49 AM
–

I posit here that you really need need to re-calibrate your moral compass. I certainly do not. Not on this issue. If you read my comment history you'd know how unambiguously opposed I am to neonatal circumcision. That said, I don't think it makes someone "not a good person" to have sensationalistically worded opinions which are not well thought-out and not in agreement with mine. He is right that circumcision is as a rule done in good faith, and his overall beliefs on it are in good faith too. H…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:48 AM
–

I didn't mean it's not one of the most important issues, just that it's not strongly associated with the MRM because most people who strongly oppose it, are not MRAs. Sorry for the mixup. So in light of that: That has nothing to do with anything. Yes, it does. It evidences that circumcision is not an issue strongly associated with the MRM in most people's minds. And I do take him at his word; I just don't think he's thinking about this seriously. He's not being insincere; he's being flippant. It…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:37 AM
1

Oh shut up you fucking psycho. I'm circumcised and I hate how my dick looks around the foreskin area. I'm just being honest; can't deal with it, become a feminist.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:32 AM
–

Also, being contrary is Milo's other defining quality. He's a Brit defending an American custom which most Brits consider abhorrent. On top of which circumcision is the men's rights issue most weakly associated with the MRM, let alone some radical, antisemitic strain of MRM; it seems that nearly all feminists I know consider neonatal circumcision barbaric, and my brother, who had his son circumcized and regretted it, feels the same. A ton of "mainstream" people do. It's unfortunate that his need…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:59 AM
–

Huh. It's honestly shocking to me that, as a Brit, he holds those views on circumcision. It is not the norm there, for one. And I have to say that "as a gay man" aesthetics matter to me, too, and that's one (negligible but still real) reason I hate circumcision. (It makes dicks look like frumpy fish wearing baggy sweaters. Also nice to feel that foreskin slide while giving head so no idea what the bit about oral is about.) No, this isn't an example of compassion, but when he talks about how boys…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:32 AM
–

It's like they want people to be personally responsible for knowing what they're consuming when they have every resource available to find that out, or something. Again, those bastards!
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:09 AM
–

The quintessiential woman theory of rape: "Any of these 'nice guys' around me might subject me to it at the drop of a hat!" The problem with this: You are actually just too neurotic and paranoid, to be suited to a mixed social setting. Solution: Stay the fuck away from men. We don't feel any safer around people as suspicious of us as you are, than you do around us. The quintessential man theory of rape: "It's bad, and I don't need to be trained like a dog to avoid doing it, but it's definitely p…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:55 AM
2

I don't take Sarkeesian's theories on prejudice + power too seriously, as it happens.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:37 AM
–

Can't tell if trolling now.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:30 AM
–

lol I love this explanation. The funny thing is that feminists think this is the "traditional" view of gender. That's why they say things like, "When you think 'gender issues' you think 'women's issues'," just as they say, "When you think 'race issues', you think 'black issues' or 'Hispanic issues', etc." (all of which is, they insist, terribly wrong-headed thinking, for those keeping score at home). It's one of my absolute favorite examples of feminist/race theorist/poststructuralist projection…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:47 AM
3

Eh. It isn't really relevant to my interest as far as men's rights goes, because aside from Milo being in the debate, who has often been an excellent advocate for the rights of men and boys, it didn't have a thing to do with men's rights. Milo made the mistake of sounding at one or two points like he was lecturing a couple of women on how women think. He was really just making a general point about the psychology of shoppers, but it was far from artful. I'm sure that he went into it expecting to…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:33 AM
–

I don't think this was a definitive win for him, though. Certainly not an instance of "trouncing" his opponent. He's better at talking about men's issues than women's. Which makes sense because he thinks a lot more about men than women, and specifically thinking about them in compassionate, empathetic terms, even those with whom he doesn't identify strongly. Which is one reason he is, as I've said, my spirit animal.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:57 AM
2

Maybe she's thinking about MRAs who basically make the male version of feminist arguments regarding the toxicity of traditional gender roles. For example, saying that women should get the same punishments as men for certain offenses that are not really (necessarily) serious offenses to begin with to the degree we have begun to think of them recently. Inebriated sex is the most uncontroversial example I can think of (obviously people are responsible for what they do while voluntarily intoxicated)…
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:42 AM
–

Milo Yiannopoulos is my spirit animal.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 04:05 AM
6

She's right in this case. They're not incompetent; they know exactly what they're doing. They're trying to ruin men's lives.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:55 AM
14

"Why isn't there an even angrier shade of red?!?!?!!!"
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:53 AM
8

“Would I have it in me to be the kind of mother that didn’t degrade or diminish his masculinity, but teach him that it can be a powerful tool for positivity, change and equality?” Lol no. You're a GMP writer. So no. You wouldn't.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:15 PM
3

Haha I do that too! I mean call my best friends cunts and dicks and bellends and twats and pretty much any genital-connoting term pops into my head at the moment just as much as scatological dysphemisms like shithead or asshole or douche water. I guess I honestly don't know how I got this vulgar. Also don't care. Oh, maybe that's how! EDIT: But I think your mom has the right kind of feminist attitude.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:21 AM
0

Male culture nurtures different things than female culture does, but if it were true that only one were nurturing—i.e. responsible for personal development—then a large percentage of cultures would not see men developing because their boys and girls were/are segregated for vast swaths of their lives.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:50 PM
3

Solipsism. As common among circ-supporting males as it is among female feminists.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:46 PM
–

Women of my generation in the west have almost no empathy for men. It's stunning sometimes, but it's evident at least subtly almost every time I talk to them. I showed a feminist friend a picture of an ad for testosterone supplements I'd been seeing in men's rooms with the words "man up", thinking surely her feminist brain would realize men have all the pressure placed on them to be ideal that women have. She laughed and said something about it being about sex (because one of the many things pro…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:33 PM
9

I was a bit disturbed when as a kid I learned what circumcision was. Before that I didn't know that my penis had been needlessly mutilated for cosmetic purposes. Also you obviously have never seen a healthy glans up close if you think all it is to be in tact is to have some extra skin.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:11 AM
–

Where are you from? I'm from Kansas and I don't think anyone in my generation finds "cunt" any more offensive than "dick". Except the feminists. FFFFFEMINISTS. =_=
/r/MensRights28/07/15 02:04 AM
3

Yeah it's probably that guy "Society". Why is he such a dick to everyone?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:02 PM
2

Absolutely. Even fans of AVfM often cringe at his tone-deafness. I won't categorically disavow his opinions, though, of course.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:50 PM
–

Isn't the most parsimonious answer that girls are less likely to have an aptitude for math?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 06:21 PM
1

Because men have different priorities... For no reason that anybody knows of. /discussion /thought
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:08 PM
8

And of course attributing any of the kids' lack of desire to see their fathers to parental alienation conveniently makes one an extremist automatically, because a woman would never.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:58 PM
3

Feminists ignore and mock some male domain, then admit that it has merit, then demand it all for themselves, and finally, once the idea that it was always, naturally the domain of women is normalized, claim that misogyny was the only reason why organized women weren't dominating it from the beginning. Repeat until nobody alive can remember how it all started, and you have the entire fucking justification for feminism.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:23 PM
3

In short: we're only allowed to cry if it's about the sort of "trivial bullshit" (to quote Ayaan Hirsi Ali) which gender feminists would cry about.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:14 PM
5

Wow. What bullshit. No the problem is that men are objectively more susceptible to being dehumanized than women are. If you want something done, like cancer research, just cherry pick some one-sided stats on how it affects women; no need to compare it to how it affects men, and in fact it's better not to especially if it turns out men are even worse off in the same or comparable areas. I mean we wouldn't want to appear to be over-funding men's issues would we? Not when men are already (take your…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:05 PM
1

Anchorman
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:11 PM
–

I'll never talk! Alright it was the Russians!
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:46 PM
–

"And what does an old, old wooden ship have to do with this field?"
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:45 PM
1

Just call me nobody then!
/r/MensRights25/07/15 11:48 PM
–

Don't worry, I'm working on the gay bomb.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 08:37 PM
1

Feminists are so bad at discussing objectification nowadays. Arguably it was always a concept rooted in absurdity; complaints about "objectification" nearly always involve the denial/downplaying of of individual audience members's subjectivity/agency, and thereby objectify the very people they accuse of objectification. "But I see this character as no less empowered for being so fucking sexy," is an easily ignored argument for feminists who will call you blind to the harmful effect of the charac…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 08:23 PM
1

Because they accurately conclude that it wouldn't have happened without testosterone.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:34 PM
3

So...if you're thinner than average then you are the "unrealistic standard" oppressing others?
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:10 PM
–

It's a really good time to be gay in the west, and it's a really bad time to be a straight man when PC thought has taken over politics and hate speech against your group is broadly viewed as acceptable in the resulting discourse.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 06:04 PM
–

"Way ahead of you," said all gay men ever. (Only partially j/k.)
/r/MensRights23/07/15 08:38 PM
2

Victim blaming is okay when it's men who are the victims.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 08:37 PM
–

"Feminist logic" = guesswork + fabrication. Actually can we start calling it "gender-feminist logic"? They're really the closest thing to a categorically blameworthy ideology in all of this. And it's their ideas which people mistakenly call "radical feminist" or "third-wave" when in reality the radfems are a tiny percentage. Self-proclaimed radfems/third-wavers are a statistically miniscule scapegoat for all mainstream gender-feminist hate rhetoric, which has been dominating the discussion since…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 08:32 PM
3

Can you imagine if crop tops were a thing for men like they are for women? Because...I can. Mmmm... /Perv
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:56 PM
4

I'm so ambivalent about Femitheist. Femitheist Divine: What does she stand for? Does she stand for things? Let's find out!
/r/MensRights22/07/15 10:57 PM
1

Or literally anything other than an adult white woman (which the hand appears to belong to)? Wow, how misogyny. Using the pronouns "anything" and "which" to refer and relate back to the phrase "adult white woman"? Bad sjw! Bad! I'm triggered.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 10:51 PM
3

Aww, are the wymyn regretting shaming men out of chivalry and now wanting to shame them back into it? The rest of this comment will deal with how much of a fuck I give and why:
/r/MensRights22/07/15 10:33 PM
26

Thank you, VAWA. Thank you, law enforcement protocol for determining primary aggressors. God it's frustrating that this is on a staunchly pro-feminist website. It is unambiguously clear what is happening here: the supposed beneficiaries of gender feminism's ancillary pet project of LGBT rights (which feminists need to meddle in much more than GSRM need them to meddle in it), are being victimized by gender feminism's primary project of legally infantilizing women (and taking advantage of the infa…
/r/MensRights22/07/15 07:17 PM
3

It's really just satire though. It's a South Park-like universe where nobody has common sense or common decency. (Except sometimes, like, Todd, as has been pointed out.) They actually tend to mock feminism (okay, "certain" forms of "third-wave" feminism). In fact, this was their one time poking fun at anything we might recognize as part of the so-called "manosphere" (which is about as much a "sphere" in the sociological sense as a cube is a sphere in the geometrical sense). Let's try to take a j…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 12:21 AM
12

But remember guys: catcalling is never about sexual attraction; it's about power. /s
/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:33 PM
7

I really wanna know who on earth "hisses" at people on the street. It doesn't sound like something that people with "privilege" do. As usual it sounds more like something that the homeless, mentally ill or otherwise downtrodden groups of men might tend to do as a response to actual, material disempowerment (not like the disempowerment feminists claim to suffer when they can't find cute clothes in their size).
/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:31 PM
5

We are just the worst. Hi, I'm GTC and I am a shitlord. It has been an infinitesimally brief period of time since I disempowered women with my existence. "Hi GTC."
/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:12 PM
4

Actually I'm pretty sure I responded in a logical manner for someone who had worked out that he was being (fecklessly) "mocked".
/r/MensRights20/07/15 11:04 PM
3

No I have a boyfriend actually. Ironically that's led to sex dominating my life less. Don't know what that does for your stupid cunty position.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 10:51 PM
3

Women weren't allowed to be in the military outside from being nurses which was a position that required training that many couldn't afford. wow so oppression why cudn't they die like men? wow
/r/MensRights20/07/15 09:22 PM
4

Gendering the universal struggle between good and evil as "feminism vs. patriarchy" is nothing more and nothing less than the ultimate expression of the "womem are wonderful" effect.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 07:03 PM
4

And feminists say patriarchy is the enemy. Men as individuals only suffer when men as a class have too much power, as the theory goes. Hmm...sounds legit!
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:56 PM
4

I find that most MRAs/antifeminists I've come across are more supportive of gay men and our sexual preferences than are the loudest voices in feminism, and possibly most feminists. Supporting gay men is the bitter medicine they have to take to advance lesbians' rights.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:08 PM
1

Huh. I've been citing it as only a four-times greater prejudice. Downplaying female misandry? I guess it's true: I am an accidental feminist!
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:02 PM
5

It finished when women, who are covered by tons of laws protecting and even favoring them, told us ... that it's time we spend more time on their issues. I call this Rose McGowaning. :p Actually I think that it's usually gender integration in schools that leads to the sexism in education. Men and boys are held to feminine standards, pathologized, and practically chemically lobotomized to keep them in line. Girls can't be dealt with like boys, so therefore boys in mixed-sex schools can't be dealt…
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:00 PM
2

Feminism generally suffers from an extreme version of the black-swan fallacy whereby, once you've defined something on the basis of experience (which can be filtered through confirmation bias from the beginning), no instance of that thing which contradicts your definition can be recognized as an instance of that thing. Not only are hateful, anti-egalitarian feminists "not real feminists" (no matter how much control they have in the movement), but MRAs who believe in equality (or something reason…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 09:42 PM
4

Women who can handle that shit are women who belong. If most women can't, tough titties. Reddit comprises some of the most Darwinian communities on the web. If men are allowed, they will build homosocial communities, and those who will find welcome there will be those whose interests, humor, and overall socializing style are compatible with male homosociality. A lot of women can handle that (because they share many of the attitudes that appear merely anti-woman when men express them) and, as we …
/r/MensRights15/07/15 06:11 PM
13

Seriously, is this author even a man? What a spineless, emasculated slug. "Grow up and accept the new status quo. Stop looking at titties and socializing like cavemen; that's icky. It's women's turn to dictate how we behave." No! They can earn their authority through force if they wanna be the fucking thought police. But I'm not handing that power to them on a silver platter just because I feel guilty (and in fact I don't) that my male ancestors had certain, limited kinds of authority over my fe…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:56 PM
2

Well we can all agree there are probably multiple vaginas he's pandering to.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:44 PM
1

Okay, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. Only because I loved the Despicable Me movies and might wanna see this.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:37 AM
–

I'll bet anything he has a feminist girlfriend. Or possibly fag hag.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:36 AM
4

That's a fair point. I guess I mean that the fear they hold as women is irrational, when as feminists they rationally perceive male spaces as an existential threat to their movement. Men being free of feminist-imposed feminization would not hurt women. It would help society.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:48 PM
2

That's a huge stretch. By a similar stretch that would be a self-defeating argument: to argue that men and women are so inherently different that only one needs space away from the other opens the door to the legitimate defense of male spaces as places which can remove a significant number of men from the presence of women, for whom their presence is such a burden that they (women) have a legitimate special need to be free of it when desired. It is hypocritical under any reasonable set of assump…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:30 AM
1

Oh but they have an answer for that that miraculously manages to blame misogyny! You see, female sexuality was just never deemed interesting or valid enough by the Patriarchy to be a concern. Sex needs a penis. Women aren't supposed to have sexual desire, and are therefore expected to be passive victims of male sexuality (i.e. rape).
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:49 AM
6

Hmm...come to think of it, I was introduced to the Honey Badgers, AVfM, and such when a gay FB friend of mine posted this, I shared it, and several feminists attacked from out of the blue with extreme dismissiveness, accusations of rape apology, telling me to check my sources better from now on (poisoning the well), etc. Even an antifeminist (and anti-MRA) girl jumped in defending circumcision and telling me I should be grateful. I had no clue what was going on. There was also the time I was com…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:47 AM
13

I didn't know that about the coffee houses. Interesting information! We are already hearing more and more about "gay misogyny," Man I am so glad you mentioned that. I've found at least one article on the supposed "culture of harassment" of women by gay men (in fact it's mostly the other way around) on every feminist or pro-feminist news site/blog that I can think of. I can link to about a dozen overtly anti-gay pieces on prominent feminist/pro-feminist sites (HuffPo, Buzzfeed, Jezebel, xo Jane, …
/r/MensRights13/07/15 12:01 AM
7

I don't think that the "there are extremists in any group" excuse works to exonerate feminism when it is mainstream feminists trying to convince a quarter or more of all women that they were raped when they don't think they were, and it's mainstream feminists seditiously and deceitfully convincing women that they will be paid 77 cents on their male colleagues' dollar for the same job, and when it is mainstream feminists calling male homosociality pathological (something which I hope will backfir…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 10:15 PM
1

Just grab a few coins/air bubbles bro.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 09:26 PM
15

Ms Pao’s abrupt downfall in the face of a torrent of sexist and racist comments, many of them on Reddit itself, is quite likely to renew charges [...] that Silicon Valley’s well-publicised problem with gender and ethnic diversity in its workforce persists. What completely incoherent logic. Redditors are apparently members of Pao's (former) "workplace" now. It's just like how individual Tweets from sockpuppet accounts that go too far in responding to feminist hate speech prove that there is someh…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 09:43 PM
3

Trying to invent cake that can be consumed while still remaining on the plate is a feminist issue.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:45 PM
3

"I read something about boys and it immediately made me think of my own problems but I am not a solipsist! I'm going to blame the patriarchy for the fact that people keep calling me that because I'm a proper feminist and will never take responsibility for my image problems."
/r/MensRights06/07/15 05:33 AM
2

I really don't understand why they were talking about a case where a woman's own lawyer used her fitbit data for her case. And then they're like, "This isn't good evidence!" It's a good thing we have TYT to point out when something doesn't work as evidence for what it's being presented as evidence for. Otherwise our justice system would crumble.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 03:09 PM
10

It's like some women (coughfeministscough) want relations/relationships between the sexes to be as pathological as possible. It lets them continue to pedestalize women (innocent, selfless victims) and dehumanize men (barbaric, self-absorbed perpetrators).
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:36 PM
8

To an extent. A very limited extent. I get the feeling the author has zero experience with how men actually go through life and thinks that even if, like, everyone you know and love gets killed in a plane crash and you cry, and you're a man, all your man friends will tell you that makes you a pussy (which is a term that has nothing to do with women and I'm shocked, shocked that a feminist author is making something out to be about women which affects only men). But yeah there's a bit of understa…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:00 PM
3

So true. We gud massusus but we hav to ask every time we tuch a wumun if iz ok. "Iz this 2 sex? How about now? Not 2 sex rite?"
/r/MensRights02/07/15 07:16 PM
2

Oh you're right! My bad. But my point that this could potentially criminalize impoliteness is still relevant
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:26 PM
2

What's the point of specifying intentionality in (a) if the law just negates it in (c)? EFIT: oh I get it. You can sue even if it doesn't cause you harm but you can say the intention was impolite, or if it you insist you were harmed even if the intention was polite! "Victim" is a term seriously at risk of losing all meaning.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:11 PM
1

If they only use it, like, .1% of the time, that's a good anti-speech law, right? Hardly a travesty of justice at all. Right?
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:06 PM
3

But but prejudice + power!
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:04 PM
6

Wumuns is so clever, all their hates-peach must be "iron-nickle". Menz is too dumb for iron-knee.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:50 PM
1

Okay, I edited it. It wasn't difficult to find another gay-male-bashing article (with feminist commenters to match), from another prominent feminist website.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 06:21 AM
1

"The Straight Cis White Man" is like the third person of the Feminist Trinity of social Creators. He sits at the right hand of the Patriarchy, and to the left is a list of gerunds with the prefix "man-" awkwardly stuck onto them.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:25 AM
1

Haha nice XD
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:10 PM
4

I'll bet it wouldn't be difficult to compile a list of "27 Buzzfeed Lists That Prove Feminism Is Incredibly Fragile" by the exact same logic.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:48 PM
4

But it's worth it for the psychic powers that come with having a beard.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:40 PM
1

It fucking pisses me off because there's this huge language barrier between the politicians who are likely to actually care about imminently pressing issues, and the entire fucking generation who would be suffering and getting drafted if they only elect those around whom they can build their little cults of personality. They want to hear your noise—I mean views—on wage gaps and equal representation in the portraits on banknotes, not on ISIS. Are you kidding? We only care about the gays here! We …
/r/MensRights19/06/15 06:37 AM
9

It is just too weird that this is a thing. I wanna rage quit the world if this is how fucking stupid and petty everyone gets as soon as they get to have remotely comfortable lives. If someone wants to "shame" me for spreading out without even asking me if I can make room for them, and/or without asking me why doing so might be difficult, I'd just laugh at how much of a worthless pussy that person is and it wouldn't have any impact on my day at all. I think the way to deal with this is not to go …
/r/MensRights19/06/15 02:05 AM
2

I don't really see how Jamie Kilstein qualifies as part of the same gender as Joe Rogan, honestly.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:52 AM
3

"The greatest trick Rape Culture ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist."
/r/MensRights19/06/15 01:01 AM
4

Except for a majority of college women?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:51 AM
2

He's not being a white knight. He's being empathetic. Nobody wants their face melting when they don't have any tissues. Ironic that you can't get over gender in this scenario to see that it would've been a thoughtful gesture even if she'd been a boy (though he wouldn't have said the same thing). And there's not a big incentive to pander to people who want boys to be portrayed positively, in case you hadn't noticed.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:49 AM
1

No connection to White Feather campaigns I'm sure.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:05 PM
12

"Denying rape culture exists is part of rape culture." "Denying God exists just proves He exists because the Bible says there will be people who deny His existence." Herp derp. More proof that feminism is a religion.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:02 PM
3

That's the argument of feminist care ethics, actually. It also seems plausible that women, while probably not more empathetic than men, are less capable of compartmentalizing their empathy and seeing pain/suffering as a potentially positive tool of justice: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/19/science/19revenge.html?_r=0 Still, these are only statistically significant differences and not very predictively useful.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 10:52 PM
1

I was bein sarcastic mayn
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:08 AM
–

When a man won't fuck a woman because of how many other men have fucked her, that's slut shaming. Men should be required to fuck women if the women want it. That's the only way to avoid false rape accusations. And if she threatens to accuse him of rape if he doesn't date her, he'd better not slut-shame her by refusing to comply.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:42 AM
3

The Nazi movement [was] badmouthed since it came to the scene, despite its huge impact on the world. I recently learned that the Third Reich instituted the first worker cafeterias, and some of the first laws against animal cruelty. Hitler actually loved (non-human) animals. He must've been a great guy. Maybe a feminist. Will have to look into that...
/r/MensRights15/06/15 11:57 PM
2

Obviously they were the kind of wig and shoes that make a man deserve being fatally shot in his sleep.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 06:42 PM
3

That would require them first to acknowledge that women have ever had significant influence in culture. Instead they prefer to think women have always been pathetic, worthless, and lacking in autonomy. Dunno why. Maybe it has something to do with their not respecting human nature and biology. And about a billion other things they have in common with extremist religion.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:53 PM
5

Evolution is a patriarchal misogynist, according to feminism.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:34 PM
2

But hey, she might've been abused, and leaving an abusive relationship can be all, like, hard and confusing for a gal. Much easier to just murder him in cold blood. She told a jury of ten women and two men that her husband often "berated" her and forced her to wear "slutty" costumes for sex. As proof she displayed a pair of high-heeled shoes and a wig to which those in attendance gasped. Well that's understandable. This was in the '50s, right? convicted of voluntary manslaughter in the 2006 shoo…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:28 PM
2

There shouldn't be indignation in either case. You'll never catch me saying, "OMG DON'T LOOK AT THAT [leaked nude, wardrobe malfunction, etc.].." It's human fucking nature.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 12:02 AM
3

Hahaha...they wish. That's the problem. There are enough straight and bi guys who go to gay bars that the shwasty bitches don't have to pester and harass the gays. They just like to. For sport, but mostly because they can, since pussy passes are honored even at most gay bars.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:33 PM
1

Drunken bachelorette parties for one. Need I go on?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:21 PM
4

Women shouldn't get drunk around men, especially if the men are also drinking—period. Not at frat houses and not at bars, including gay bars (speaking from a lot of experience). I mean how is that not the most obvious, uncontroversial statement one can make in this enlightened age? When did suggesting gender segregation in reasonable situations become as "taboo" as saying that we should put yellow stars on all the Jews? Fuck it all. EDIT: And just to clarify, this isn't because I believe that wh…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:32 PM
5

Edgy.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:28 PM
13

So disgusting it literally makes me feel like crying, which is a rare reaction to anything for me. Even Pride has become more about entitled women's feelings than about the legitimately aggrieved group(s) it is meant to represent. Any organization who wants to participate in that and support equality should be able to, unless they're an actual hate group or something. Anyond want to tell feminist women that their grievances—even if they were legitimate—don't come close to trumping those of every…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:30 AM
–

Hmm...could Caligula plausibly be called a solipsist? Because he was maybe worse.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:45 PM
–

I can't even do anything with this. I can't say "Right, you mean nice as in a bunch of lying cowards. Cary on," because that's basically what she freely, proudly admits from the get-go: being nice means not being trustworthy or honest or knowing how to negotiate even minimally awkward social situations without simply preemptively misleading people in order to avoid those situations altogether. God feminist bloggers are the biggest self-aggrandizing solipsists that humanity has ever produced. EDI…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 07:04 AM
–

I died.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 05:36 PM
28

Well that's what it objectively is. There is no way of getting around the fact that male circumcision is the mutilation of genitals which are male. Support or oppose it, you would have to change the definitions of words to not agree that it is what it is. I've heard supporters of neonatal male circumcision refer to it as MGM too. Also there are other things which could be described as MGM such as operations on intersex babies or babies deemed intersex but who are to all intents and purposes male…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:53 AM
2

Ooh I see Andrew Sullivan has an excellent piece against it.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:45 AM
–

I think it was actually this piece, linked in the above one. But ooh, look! backpedaling! From Ezra's original article ("'Yes Means Yes' is a terrible law, and I completely support it"): To work, "Yes Means Yes" needs to create a world where men are afraid.[...] [...] Critics worry that colleges will fill with cases in which campus boards convict young men (and, occasionally, young women) of sexual assault for genuinely ambiguous situations. Sadly, that's necessary for the law's success. It's th…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:55 PM
2

I agree. I didn't mean to imply that they were saying that, though, and if that were the case then no, I wouldn't put up with it. Certainly not from a bunch of white women's studies majors whom 99% of the world would consider just as "privileged" as they "accuse" their enemies of being. I'm saying that feminist victimology is solipsistic and frequently throws minorities under the bus in order to focus inappropriately on women's feelings.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:35 PM
2

So many nice things lost. What, she didn't mention their cats and dogs?
/r/PussyPass24/03/15 06:08 PM
3

So they figured "Better one child getting punished undeservedly, than both?" I'm sorry but I don't buy it one bit. If they wanted the luxury of being honorable in all things, they shouldn't have had a child. Protecting the person for whose existence you are uniquely responsible, takes precedence over honor. Fuck, it takes precedence over reason. No, if I were his parents I would have held those other, beastly parents' little girl as a legal hostage, innocent though she was, and threatened to dra…
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 09:42 PM
7

Infant genital cutting should not be done except in rare cases where it is overwhelmingly clear it is a medical necessity. I'd like to add to this that preputioplasty should always be considered before circumcision, whenever possible. (I honestly don't know that there's any case where preputioplasty can't treat foreskin-related problems just as effectively as circumcision.)
/r/MensRights15/02/15 10:19 PM
–

It's horrible. 1) It really does make me less able to enjoy stimulation around my circumcision scar some of the time. I am still perfectly capable of enjoying sex overall, but sometimes if, say, I'm getting head and there's too much friction from the tongue/lips just under the glans (where the scar is) it produces such an unpleasant sensation that I lose my erection. 2) I think men who say they are "grateful" to be circumcised, are tools. I can't help it. When I hear that I can only wish they ne…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 10:11 PM
–

Probably at least sympathetic. I've stayed well away from r/atheism since around elevatorgate, though it was mainly just coincidence that I fell out of "organized atheism" around that time. Just recently checked back into the online atheist community and it's fucking creepy. Prominent voices whom I used to respect are promoting this atheism+ bullshit and censoring people like crazy. Lots of atheist YouTubers whom I always liked watching seem to have taken up the cause of countering this fanatici…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 09:03 PM
3

Nothing about this sounds particularly credible. How about we punish just the women who are castrating or otherwise abusing their husbands, for such abuse no matter its actual incidence? Or is that too radical?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:16 AM
1

How is saying that nobody should be the head of the family any better than saying that one gender or the other should always be the head of the family? They're both ridiculous notions by virtue of denying individual circumstance.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:13 AM
1

Yeah, don't you love how it's impossible for some Feminists (most or almost all, I'd wager) to take man-hating seriously even when people openly admit to hating men? Any man who would consider a person who claims (even "ironically") to be a misandrist, worthy of even sucking his dick, is a tool who deserves whatever horribly regrettable and emasculating relationship he will inevitably end up in.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:39 AM
3

Link?
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:11 AM
4

I...just threw up a little in my mouth.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:50 AM
10

Here's hoping she never has a son...or a relationship.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 10:59 PM
1

I had the same thought. I'm not exactly surprised that this blog exists, knowing many gay anti-Feminists myself and being one myself, but I'm glad that there seems to be more and more recognition these days that Feminists and LGBT+ people are not the natural allies that they somehow got cast as at some point after second-wave Feminism (which was in fact openly anti-gay-male). I've read enough Feminist tripe bashing "gay culture" as "misogynistic" and gay men's spaces as breeding grounds for "sex…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 10:30 PM
3

"Usually women are only violent when the man causes it." True. Usually what they do to cause it is called "breathing".
/r/MensRights08/02/15 10:15 PM
7

It's true. That's why they have so many more health problems than men.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 09:27 PM
16

"Women are wonderful."
/r/MensRights08/02/15 08:33 PM
10

Same with solicitors.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 06:27 AM
1

Yes, that's why I say "I wish I could".
/r/MensRights06/02/15 09:47 PM
1

We're cuddlier.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:49 AM
1

Empowewment!
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:35 AM
3

I wish I could make that a bumper sticker or something.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:29 AM
3

Are there even MRAs who say "Kill all women"? You know, to sorta balance out all the Feminists who sign all their emails with "Kill all men" or similar "ironic" messages?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:53 AM
1

I wonder if she needs to use a special space bar. Maybe it's broken up into little space keys, maybe with a Patriarchy key in the middle so she can put the Patriarchy "under her thumb" whenever she's feeling oppressed.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:51 AM
4

It has nothing to do with white men. She's saying that the word "misogynist" is the new equivalent to "nigger" in that, when it is applied to a man or a woman who happens not to agree with fundamental tenets of Feminism, it is as a tool used to shut down discussion, thought, or the possibility that anyone else will side with that dissenting voice and risk being called "misogynist" himself (or herself). That was the point of the video, and I don't really see how you managed to miss it and twist i…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:05 AM
8

Wait so the black woman who made the video is racist against herself? Oh well I guess that shouldn't surprise her, since she already knows she's a misogynist. If you missed the point, maybe try checking above your head.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:01 AM
1

Are you twelve? This sounds like something a twelve-year-old would say if he browsed the Internet for too long without adult supervision.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:06 PM
3

Sorry to nitpick, but isn't MGTOW a plural? Shouldn't this say a MGHOW? EDIT: Eh. I don't know if I made myself clear. My point want really about a nicety following from grammar.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:58 PM
2

Yeah I thought that the points she actually did bring up were at least as strong and should have ended the "debate" just as easily if Cenk had been interested in/capable of listening.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:27 PM
7

Holy shit. Holy shit. I lost it when Anita Sarkeesian was shown claiming that men's greater physical strength is merely a "deeply ingrained, socially constructed myth." I mean I don't know that I have ever heard anyone seriously claim that...well, anyone other than prepubescent girls. Yes, please encourage girls to base their self-esteem on how their physical abilities compare to those of boys, and on other masculine values. That's a wonderful idea...if you want to completely destroy any chance …
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:31 AM
8

This is why Feminists want universities to adjudicate rape cases rather than the justice system. It's because the uni is (even) less likely do it right. Fairness is usually a bad thing for Feminism.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 10:32 PM
3

I can't believe what passes as "news" sometimes. "Breaking: sexist mangina white knight 'is right' to call for favoritism towards women." Breaking: Lydia Smith is a cunt.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 10:32 PM
2

It's shit like this that just fuels anger and division between the sexes and makes these Women look like utter contemptible moron cunts to most Men. I'm convinced that contemptible moron cunts like this are completely aware that that's true. They know what they're doing. They may be bad at reasoning but they're not completely stupid and they're clearly not incompetent to have gotten where they are. They can at least connive with the best of them.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:58 AM
8

Err, at the risk of saying something insensitive (not that I actually give a fuck), don't most Jews consider true Judaism culturally and ethnically exclusionary? As in, they essentially conflate their metaphysical beliefs with their ethnicity, and actively discourage people of other backgrounds from converting? It can be seen as a good thing since they don't proselytize, and most people like that, but even from all the descriptions of this practice I've heard from actual cultural Jews, I fail to…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 10:25 PM
2

I agree with the fact that Feminism works in a certain Bizarro world, but I also still agree with OP that it's morally reprehensible and even dangerous in the real world. I was mainly arguing that what you said doesn't seem to be grounds to say that Feminism isn't morally reprehensible, and on top of that I was saying that the Bizarro universe in which Feminism works is much more absurd and incoherent than anyone had been pointing out up till now. Just to be clear: I know plenty of Feminists who…
/r/MensRights25/01/15 09:58 PM
2

Good points. I don't think it shows that Feminism is not morally reprehensible, so much as why Feminists think they're doing the right thing, which is practically tautological true of any ideology. (Though there are many Feminists who don't give a shit whether they're morally right because their "revenge complex" and is just that strong: I've seen multiple female Facebook friends of mine say that they can't bring themselves to care about men because they have only ever thought of themselves and …
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:22 PM
17

“I put him down as father to get assistance,” she told 7 Action News. She didn’t realize that would start a paternity case. Really? What did she think would happen, then??
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:32 PM
1

That's why the rad fems hate them! Lol
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:37 PM
3

"You know she's a girl! You know she's weak! That's not resisting!" Yeah! You can't arrest women! Her pussypass from the cops was that she didn't get tased or worse.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/01/15 06:52 AM
2

Oh okay cool. Then there was a study but HuffPo's coverage of it was deliberately biased, subjective and incendiary? But then it failed at being incendiary so they just looked impotent and unprofessional? And now we can all laugh at them whether we're part of Gamer Gate or tend stay the fuck away from all that drama? Cool! I think that cleared it up for me.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:11 AM
3

Wait so just so we're clear, there was no actual study? I'd be shocked, shocked to learn that this is bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 06:30 AM
7

Yes but it doesn't sound like serious journalism that way. "I walked into an MRA meeting and then walked out after a while. Let me give you some vague impressions of my experience with next to no concrete examples."
/r/MensRights26/11/14 11:31 PM
1

You're either a pathological liar who thinks that feigning a sudden loss of facility with the English language constitutes a good strategy for manipulating or ending a discussion, or just extremely dense. Yes, yes I believe you do understand what I'm talking about considering that I've kept my comments completely relevant to the topic. We've been talking about supposed harassment of women in gay bars, which you affirm to be a thing, when it's actually women who come to gay bars in order to "hara…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:08 AM
1

I'm talking about women who bitch about sexual harassment from gay men because "They touched my body without my express oral or written permission o noes!" even though I guarantee you that they treated those same men, and/or other gay men, in even more inappropriate ways than what they're bitching about. I've experienced this first-hand from many a drunk bitch, inside and outside of gay bars, even in the middle of the fucking day. But people like you buy their bullshit simply because they're wom…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 09:18 PM
1

Straight women sexually harass gay men at gay bars (and in general) at a much higher rate than gay men "sexually harass" straight women at gay bars, in my experience. And only the women's behavior is anything that wouldn't fly if a straight man did it to another; i.e. the gay men are treating the straight women like fellow (gay) men, often after the women have implicitly given them the okay to do this, by groping them or grinding on them (if they're feeling self-restrained). If drunk straight gi…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:18 AM
1

Wait are you saying that the only reason a gay man would have to talk to a woman about sex would be to harass?
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:55 AM
2

At least one of these guys—the guy she meets at the 2-minute mark—was (IMO) obviously gay. She continued to try to make her "pitch" (which she sucked at, btw) to him and others after they demonstrated an obvious lack of interest from the beginning. How is that any better than following a woman for five minutes without speaking and then trying to talk to her, despite the fact that she hadn't responded to your first attempts to communicate with her? That was the one part of that "10 hours of haras…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter