TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hi_Panda Archive

View 0 posts and 108 comments by Hi_Panda on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Obviously trying a bit is fine. but you still have to impress women, got it.
/r/seduction10/09/21 02:41 PM
1

lol! to whom? to you?
/r/seduction10/09/21 02:34 PM
1

got it. but it still depends. if im I'm seeing 2 guys that I equally like and one tries to impress me with time and effort, I will like that guy more than the guy who tries to impress me less.
/r/seduction10/09/21 12:21 PM
0

i doubt it
/r/seduction10/09/21 05:04 AM
-2

your post plus the title literally has 3 sentences so yes, it's missing your point.
/r/seduction10/09/21 04:59 AM
-2

your girl must have low standards bc apparently the guy doesn't have to do anything for her to be with him.
/r/seduction10/09/21 04:52 AM
5

yeah. if there are other guys impressing the woman, why would she be impress with the guy who does nothing/not impressive.
/r/seduction10/09/21 01:50 AM
3

wow, women want "average". then you probs have average standards. you're doing men disservice by telling them they can be average and women will want them. and then they complain that they don't get women. also, you're doing yourself disservice by just going with "average" unless of course you don't want to be alone which sadly is an issue for a lot of people. you do you of course but as a woman, I have high standards and proud of it.
/r/seduction27/07/21 06:56 PM
1

you didn't answer my question. are you the one who does the chasing? bc someone has to be. but yes, people don't like needy people regardless of gender.
/r/seduction27/07/21 03:58 PM
2

curious but are you the one who does the chasing? bc if someone is walking away, someone has to do the chasing. if both parties walk away, then a relationship doesn't happen.
/r/seduction27/07/21 03:41 PM
2

as a woman, I approve this message. makes it easy to weed men out.
/r/seduction27/07/21 01:32 AM
1

you wish he's 5'5. his wife is 5'7 and there's tons of papparazi pics where he's taller than her. the media does exaggerate on the height sometimes but if it was, I would estimate that bieber is at 5'8 which is still taller than the average. and even if he is short, he has other characteristics to make up for it (voice, style, attractive face etc) which makes a lot of women like him. which is the point of this sub: if you have a physical quality that deters the opposite sex, you have to either b…
/r/seduction03/01/21 07:39 PM
1

what do you think his height is?
/r/seduction03/01/21 06:34 PM
2

except your post makes it seem that there's a lot of women out there specifically attracted to overweight/short/bald men which is delusional. it's about as many as men who specifically like overweight women 🤷. and then men who read your posts will wonder why they can't get women when they could have have improved something about them that they can (personality/money etc- assuming they lack those things).
/r/seduction03/01/21 03:40 PM
0

justin bieber is 5'9 who is married someone to 5'7. average male height in the US is 5'7. I don't consider justin bieber short.
/r/seduction03/01/21 03:34 PM
2

exactly. her post does a disservice bc men might think that there are tons of women out there who look specifically for short/overweight/bald men. said men might not bother to improve other aspects of themselves that they can actually change (personality/financial status) and then wonder why they don't get women.
/r/seduction03/01/21 05:06 AM
2

also from another woman's perspective, your post sounds super optimistic. thankfully people have varying taste so what's attractive to one is not attractive to another. sure there are women out there who like overweight men but I would gander they number the same as men who like overweight women- not a lot. looks matter to an extent, if they weren't, this sub wouldn't exist.
/r/seduction03/01/21 05:00 AM
11

I suppose you have a point when ugly men think they should have a chance with hot women.
/r/seduction15/12/20 12:24 PM
14

there's no double standard, just don't date these hot girls if that bothers you enough.
/r/seduction15/12/20 11:36 AM
-13

sorry but I'll be frank and say that this post sounds very narcissistic and all I hear is what you want and not the other person's. that you want the benefits of a serious relationship but not partake in it's negatives. I don't have an advice for you on where you'll find this unicorn of a relationship and I don't think FDS can either since this sub is more serious relationship/marriage minded.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/08/20 08:46 PM
57

yes. please read the handbook, this is basic FDS. you look at a man's action, not his words so get over this guy since it doesn't look like he's serious about you.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/08/20 08:34 PM
10

and to add to the age difference, there's a big possibility that once OP levels up with her career, they might not like each other anymore bc she has grown to be a different person.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/08/20 08:23 PM
61

not going to lie, i think you are projecting. he's a sales manager and you work a minimum wage job. it's your job to get your career together, not him. you depend so much on him financially and is creating an imbalance in the relationship.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/08/20 06:54 PM
25

I grew up the same way but I have mostly figured out what I want and don't want so when I have sex, I am truly doing it for me and not for anyone else. if you're having sex truly because YOU want to, nothing else matters. and I have to be clear on this bc a lot of girls have sex bc they think they like the guy but really, it's bc they crave a man's attention or validation. that distinction is important and sadly can be confusing to differentiate at times so a strong sense of self and confidence …
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy23/08/20 04:52 PM
1

if the guy says is emotionally unavailable with you as you have stated in your example, believe him or you will just end up wasting your time. no amount of sex and playing gf will change that.
/r/seduction23/08/20 02:28 PM
14

it's great that you know negging signs at a young age but also, imo, it's there's no LVM/HVM/NVM for people at such young ages of 16 and 17. people are still growing at that time and getting to know themselves. everyone is better off figuring themselves than dating at that age.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/08/20 09:03 PM
6

when you send a nude, expect it to be leaked and that should be the lesson here. you may get civil damages and the guys life might be ruined but this is one of the unfortunate things that at the end of day, it's a woman's naked photos that is out in the internet and if you're cool with that, then keep sending it out. the guy doesn't always have to send it out for revenge or being an ass, you or your SO's phones might get hacked and damage is already done.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/08/20 07:17 PM
2

based from OP's response and the words used, I think this is a troll post and OP is a dude.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/08/20 02:52 PM
5

are you a troll who have to tell us how how you LOVE an older man? if I have to answer why you have to do FDS, then you clearly have not read the handbook and you're not worth further responding to.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/08/20 02:47 PM
4

you sound stubborn who think you've got life figured out at the age of 23. older men does not always equal mature, stable men and you will know this is if you start dating long enough. perhaps you will get lucky that you will find your older unicorn man who will respect you equally at your young age or you will not.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/08/20 02:32 PM
19

get therapy or self help books if you can. it will be a hard road in life if you don't know how to set boundaries in men, or in life.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy21/08/20 01:36 AM
21

just say you're not interested, you don't even like the guy. you have to clearly reject him somehow because if you can't say no to a guy you find repulsive, how will you be able to say no or set boundaries to a guy you like.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy21/08/20 01:30 AM
10

men who make $975k but don't want their wives to become a stay at home mom (or whatever their family desires) already tells me that there's a high chance that they will break up in a couple of years bc he doesn't care for her wants that much.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy19/08/20 11:21 PM
7

Please, read the handbook. Insane that you care more about this LVM's welfare than yours. It's not FDS behaviour.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy19/08/20 06:47 AM
15

that's why you should never live with a guy unless you're married. it also makes it harder to leave if you do so.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy12/08/20 02:08 AM
17

exactly. I was hoping that OP would give great advice but that response still perpetuates stringing women along so OP could have his cake and eat it too.
/r/seduction04/08/20 04:35 PM
57

it's either the saddest thing I read or a man wrote it, I can't tell.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy04/08/20 03:13 PM
7

long term ex/cohabitated is a red flag bc I've always thought that they're the type of guys who would string women along so yeah, you risk being a forever girlfriend.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy02/08/20 01:59 PM
6

I read this through articles and sad to say but a lot of couples that Sima matched didn't end well.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy31/07/20 02:56 AM
3

you guys already had sex on the 3rd (?) date and it sounds like you were doing all the chasing so I sadly don't see a relationship potential on this one. I would stop contacting him at this point and have him initiate texts and dates and you will know your answer.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy30/07/20 03:13 AM
9

curious but why is that?
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy29/07/20 02:43 AM
-1

of course, I knew that from day 1 and thankfully never need to read this post as a reminder.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy25/07/20 10:21 PM
1

nah. TLDR is only allow looksmatch to pursue you? it is shallow and good luck with that especially with people having varied taste in looks. what's attractive to me is what's not attractive to you. and perhaps it's bc I've never personally had this problem bc I never romantically entertain men that I don't find physically attractive at all regardless of their other redeeming qualities.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy25/07/20 09:54 PM
10

women should be free to be attracted to anyone who they think is attractive but this post plus all the cringy incel terms sounds shallow imo as an attractive man does not always equal HVM. also, all you ever mentioned about your current boyfriend is that he compliments your appearance a lot and it's not really that impressive.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy25/07/20 03:26 PM
1

OP posted that he's from a small town with very slim pickings so your post doesnt make sense. OP- your best bet is to move if your priority is to meet women. Or you can stay at a rural area and just hope that you'll meet an attractive woman who you like and likes you back.
/r/seduction23/07/20 05:26 AM
15

he doesn't care that he lost Diana since he was not in love with her anyway. a dude can try to impress me but if I don't like him, it doesn't matter.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy20/07/20 09:11 PM
9

I get it but 19 year olds don't know any better and are likelier to take it literally rather than what you posted.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy17/07/20 02:52 PM
26

label it as spam, maybe? no need to do a brutal response.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy16/07/20 03:22 AM
11

I felt insane chemistry with this guy online/over the phone for about a year when I was younger. we knew each other previously briefly and reconnected again online. we met in person again and hanged out for a week and the chemistry was not there. you might be hyping up this guy on your head but chemistry online does not always equate to chemistry in person. I'm glad I learned this lesson when I was starting to date so I didn't waste my time. it will be harder to vet him bc sweet words are easier…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy15/07/20 11:26 PM
143

he already showed you his cards and it doesn't look like you guys have the same timeline. i would dump him bc you will just waste 4-5 years of your life.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy15/07/20 05:38 AM
17

are you married? if no, why are you doing laundry for this guy? *not sure if that was a hypothetical example in your post thankfully Never have to deal with guys like that. my husband and my guy friends are all great cooks and actually better than us women. I don't expect guys to be amazing at all housework but if they suck at all, even with one of the easiest like laundry, that's a big red flag since you'll most likely be the maid when married.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy15/07/20 03:54 AM
9

this "convo" is just embarrassing for both of you.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy13/07/20 11:14 PM
126

agreed. I cringe when women on here posts their comebacks to these LVM to "teach them a lesson" or to call them out instead of blocking and ignoring these dudes. I can't help but think that women who do that are still craving for an iota of a man's attention. also, another reason to block and delete immediately is bc these men could be quick to call you names and criticize you that it could just end up hurting your feelings/mess with your head so why bother wasting your energy to further the con…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy13/07/20 04:06 AM
25

I was bored and tbh sometimes I’m curious about where conversations can lead with minimal effort that's what you think but in the end, you're still wasting your energy with an LVM as exemplified by posting this cringe post on FDS. if you're bored, get a hobby or hang out with friends instead of entertaining low value men.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy12/07/20 03:30 AM
9

men know what they're doing. teaching men a lesson is not a woman's job. women complain about unpaid emotional labor and teaching men a lesson is one of those examples that OP in this example will not get a benefit for. women think that they're teaching men a lesson by giving them these comebacks but men usually ignore them or just make fun of your text with their friends. if you want to teach men a lesson and protect your precious energy at the same time, just ignore and block.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy11/07/20 10:15 PM
18

its not a woman's job to teach men a lesson that's why FDS' stance is to just ignore and block. its a waste of energy.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy11/07/20 09:26 PM
17

why does this matter to you? your looks are not who you are as a person. this is such toxic thinking bc if you're only 29 years old young and already feel this way, can you imagine how you'd feel once you're middle aged and older (45+).
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy11/07/20 12:29 AM
15

I would even go further. men who do this are a waste of time and are mostly like low value. please don't confront them since you'll just waste your energy, just BLOCK.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy10/07/20 02:23 PM
21

you're the one doing the chasing tho.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy08/07/20 11:23 PM
2

people have different communication and dating styles. OP posed a question with such few details about the guy so the general advice is that men who are clear and fast in communication are more likely interested in a woman than a guy who is not.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy08/07/20 01:49 AM
5

I don't know the FDS rule on texting but I personally respond back to guys I'm interested in asap when I was dating. Its my communication style so I expect them to be the same if they value me and it marks compatibility in that aspect.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/07/20 11:10 PM
59

it depends. is he always late to respond? if yes, he's probably texting other girls too. what kind of job does he have? some jobs make it harder to respond than others. and even if that, the best communicators will at least give you a heads up that they'll busy for the day and won't be able to respond quickly. ultimately, men who value you will text you back asap. if they're always texting back late, they're most likely seeing other women and is just wasting your time.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/07/20 07:33 PM
53

best dating strategy is to love yourself. it applies to both men and women and is actually quite difficult for some to do. but once you love yourself, you don't take crap from anyone/lower your standards and you also become a nice person to everyone else. everything truly starts from within.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/07/20 03:10 PM
27

men who are really into you would introduce you to his friends and family asap. I hate to say this but men would like to show you off and they want to see you how compatible you are with them.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy29/06/20 09:52 PM
2

he didn't initiate the divorce bc it's still a stigma in the Royal family at that time. he's also first in line. the queen literally has to give him permission to divorce. he was not like a regular citizen who can just go to a courthouse and ask for it. it's also no surprise that both were emotionally unavailable bc it was a marriage born out of duty, not out of love. they had an age gap (he 30, she 19) and only went on one date before they got married. her family encouraged the marriage to elev…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy29/06/20 01:51 PM
10

we're talking about the Royal family here and their rules, especially at that time, is just different compared to how regular folks operate. they marry based on duty, not on love, which is what caused the mess with them 3. I dont think Charles/Camilla/Diana were bad people, it was just a tragic situation all around. I actually think Diana vs Camilla is a great example of FDS. Diana was prettier than Camilla and she tried her best to keep her marriage with Charles to work but it ultimately failed…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy29/06/20 06:05 AM
76

unpopular take here. she looked amazing but i doubt it would have mattered to Prince Charles bc he was not in love with her anyway. their relationship is tragic in that Prince Charles was always into Camila but she was not deemed suitable by the Royal Family and had to marry Diana out of duty instead. it doesnt matter that Diana was prettier than Camila; the heart wants what it wants and Charles was in love with Camila from the beginning. and I do think it relates back to FDS in that no matter h…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy28/06/20 05:54 PM
2

either you find other women, or if they are indeed better than you, you have to level up and meet them at their level.
/r/seduction10/06/20 09:52 PM
36

screams insecure woman to me.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy21/05/20 07:27 AM
36

cringe. long voicemails are no different than long text paragraphs.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy21/05/20 06:15 AM
5

this applies to both men and women but attractive is attractive. older men and women who are attractive will have an easier time in the dating world compared to those who aren't. i.e. Meghan Markle at 37 will always be more desirable than an unattractive 25 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/20 08:08 PM
35

aside from birth defects, the other thing to worry about big age Gap imo is that you'll be widowed at a younger age since men have shorter lifespan than women.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy25/04/20 12:23 AM
2

i would exclude celebrities too bc their experience is not representative of the general population.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/20 10:35 PM
2

I get what you mean but ultimately they're both ways to improve one's attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 02:44 PM
5

yep, but either way, it doesn't really matter. people have the right to reject people who they don't find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 06:35 AM
1

makeup is probably the most evident ambut both sexes use tools to improve what they look like. guys shave or trim beards etc and has a big bearing on their attractiveness so it's about the same to me. this is also not as common but some guys use makeup now too as well (I.e concealer for acne/dark undereyes)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/20 06:10 AM
12

I could see this work but the funny thing is that this same advice is also given to women. so if both walk away, neither will be in a relationship lol.
/r/seduction08/04/20 03:23 AM
2

how and when do men even know there's no reward in the end? there are "loser" men who have kids and there are "accomplished" men who never had kids. people should work on themselves bc they're doing it to better themselves. people live unhappy lives bc they do it for others (ie if I work and get a $200k job, a woman will love me). sadly, Incels don't have the want to do this kind of mental work and internalization ("because what's the point?? I'm not going to get a woman anyway").
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 04:39 PM
2

wow, you must have lots of energy. good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 03:40 PM
2

there are men who probably died as virgins and yet were still able to accomplish lots in life (Nikolas Tesla, Sir Issac Newton). I think your post is a projection of yourself and that the answer to your post is that perhaps some people simply have no ambition/sense of purpose in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 03:30 PM
3

do you think you'll still be able to say that if you work full time as a nurse aide (per the Internet: they bathe, feed, help out patients etc) who works lots of OT?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 03:15 PM
1

people chase dreams because it gives them a sense of purpose. tbh, your post is a whole lot of projection that just says about yourself. there are famous people in history who probably died as virgins i.e Nikolas Tesla, Sir Issac Newton, and yet still had ambition and drive to accomplish something big.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 02:58 PM
3

here's a thought: men should work hard and try for themselves, not for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/20 07:19 AM
3

boo hoo
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 11:15 PM
5

and I still say that men should still try despite whatever perceived barriers they think there are. it's a male dominated world; women had the same problem for decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 10:59 PM
9

so men should just not try because spots are guaranteed for women? what a joke. you could also say this applies to some women (there are fields that are still male dominated) and yet that doesn't deter some women from trying and making more money/being more educated.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 10:44 PM
7

yes. and the bit on how it's a female dominated economy makes it harder for men to date. maybe men should step up and be educated and/or be high earners themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/20 09:44 PM
1

no, divorce rates aren't astronomical for the recent generations. people are getting married at a later age now; and really, most people aren't even getting married nowadays, it's mostly well off people who do. https://time.com/5434949/divorce-rate-children-marriage-benefits/ also, even good, happy relationships implode bc I don't think people are meant for long term relationships esp with life span that reach 90+ nowadays but maybe thats a convo outside of this sub.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy04/04/20 05:54 PM
1

almost no one actually thinks before getting married? that's a stretch esp considering that people who get married later in age nowadays.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy04/04/20 04:45 PM
1

no one gets married thinking they'll get divorced though.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy04/04/20 05:12 AM
1

marriage doesn't have to be expensive but numbers now show that marriage increase in numbers for couples who are well off and financially secure. considering that a lot of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, I wouldn't be surprised if they hold off on marriage and having kids. can't say if it's a case causation or correlation but marriage has become a status symbol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/20 08:27 PM
1

probably Bec they can't afford it. people take longer to get married now unless their careers and education are taken care of.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/20 05:47 PM
8

it's possible that there might be exceptions to this but I believe that chemistry shows very soon in the relationship. I don't think it's the type that grows over time. you guys either have chemistry or you don't and it feels addicting. if there's no chemistry but you guys are compatible, it would be similar to arranged marriages since both of you match on paper. ultimately, it's up to you on what kind of relationship you want.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy25/02/20 04:54 AM
1

no woman deserve to be in a toxic and misogynistic environment that's why this sub advocates that you work on yourself mentally/emotionally before going into relationships.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy24/02/20 05:46 PM
-7

I totally believe it. in dating, what you are is what you get.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy24/02/20 07:38 AM
9

you're only 21, most people your age are not thinking about serious relationships. you say that you don't think that becoming a better woman is the solution but as hard it is, it is the only way. there are no shortcuts to it. I truly believe that when it comes to dating, you get what you are.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/02/20 07:47 PM
16

not sure why women like to do "tests" after breaking up. don't text back, just block. texting back is validating them so you're really no different than them coz you're still giving them attention.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/02/20 04:57 PM
5

Ive always been a feminist which taught me to love myself and not tie my self worth to sex or being in a relationship with a guy. my dad had a talk with me also in my early teens how men are only interested in sex so I should really vet them through their pattern of behavior. I did try to be the cool girl when I was 19 and went out with a 21 yo fuckboy but I realized immediately that having sex/being nice did not get me a relationship that I wanted. my dad ,of course, was right all along. I want…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy22/02/20 12:40 PM
26

if you didn't care about him, you wouldn't have posted about him on FDS. stories like these are dime in a dozen and posted everyday and it continues because women take the bait like you do.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy21/02/20 03:43 PM
9

you're 21 years old young And have the rest of your life to work on yourself and find another HVM. this too shall pass, it is not the end of the world.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy20/02/20 08:54 PM
42

Men know that being in a relationship is work so they are picky who they commit to whereas women don't realize that it is but we are conditioned to give it freely(i.e always be a nice girl) and expecting the same in return. that's obvs not how it works.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy10/02/20 04:51 AM
-5

then why bother asking if hvw will be screwed regardless.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/01/20 07:59 AM
-4

if a woman is truly high value, she will be able to spot LVM and this wouldn't really be an issue since she'll just ignore them.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy07/01/20 06:24 AM
5

they grew apart per sources. they've been married for 25 years, that's a long time. https://people.com/movies/jeff-mackenzie-bezos-grew-apart-without-knowing-it/ the definition of starter wife is someone who supports the guy and when he gets successful, dumps the wife for a more beautiful/younger wife. obviously this is all subjective but Mackenzie is younger and imo prettier than Lauren Sanchez. I did read that Lauren has a very outgoing and charming personality, and was also into aviation whic…
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy03/01/20 04:36 AM
5

they were married for 25 years. I don't think the term starter wife is even applicable at this point. they grew apart and divorced after 25 years which just happens in life.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy02/01/20 08:21 PM
1

edited my post, thanks!
/r/RedPillWomen06/10/19 08:55 PM
3

although from time to time I do worry about the consequences of such decision. Do you have any advices for women like me? Is there anything I should prioritize? i'm basing my comment from there.
/r/RedPillWomen06/10/19 08:53 PM
1

you asked for advice and people gave it to you. If you are resolute on your choice on being a housewife, as you said you are, then who cares what everyone else thinks.
/r/RedPillWomen06/10/19 07:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter