TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HiilestTehtyAffena Archive

View 14 posts and 380 comments by HiilestTehtyAffena on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
221

GeneralHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights23/08/17 07:21 AM
133

False AccusationHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:02 AM
67

DiscriminationHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:45 AM
27

Edu./Occu.HiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights05/08/17 09:46 AM
27

Social IssuesHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights11/06/17 09:10 AM
22

Edu./Occu.HiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:24 AM
19

Eastern CultureHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights22/08/17 06:02 AM
19

HumourHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights17/07/17 05:42 AM
11

FeminismHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:17 PM
9

Social IssuesHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights28/08/17 11:53 AM
8

Edu./Occu.HiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights22/06/17 12:44 PM
3

Edu./Occu.HiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights25/08/17 06:14 AM
2

Social IssuesHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights19/08/17 05:29 AM
1

False AccusationHiilestTehtyAffena/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:58 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

You do what all the time? Downvote because of ignorance or propaganda?
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:22 AM
7

If you wanted to deny innate differences in psychological traits and brain structures you'd have to deny different fetal hormones and hormone levels depending on the sex of the fetus. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01541042 But according to feminists this can't be the case because they don't like it. It's a conspiracy that publishes wrong hormone measurements, apparently.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 07:37 AM
1

Without any context it's just a fact (except for the shaming). If it's part of an argument for "women and children first" then it is or could be something else, but even then I fail to see anything particularly feminist about it. I've seen feminists trying to prove that there has never been a "women and children first" principle (which is a lie, of course). But defending the principle hardly fits their narrative.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 07:22 AM
1

Could somebody explain what's feminist about stating this fact? The shaming part in the end?
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:39 AM
2

What kind of a family background has a man who hates himself that much? What's the family background of feminist men in general? I don't want to hurt anybody's feelings, but could it be that they are often from single mother (or lesbian) households? and if so, is their number rising? (And I know perfectly well that most boys from that kind of a background won't end up hating themselves, but I believe the likelihood gets higher).
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:25 AM
1

Lenin.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:13 AM
-12

I'm pretty sure that the figure is right (for full-time workers). What conclusion you should draw is a different question. Illinois prefers class war (feminist) kind of an approach: people can be divided into two groups which are in conflict with each other, one oppressing the other one. EDIT: Let's regard this as a test: is saying a fact going to get you downvoted here. If so, please, add the reason for downvoting: ignorance or propaganda. :)
/r/MensRights02/09/17 05:34 AM
1

Not so, that's a different index, namely WEF's Gender gap Index. This one found out that in most OECD countries women are better off.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 05:26 AM
1

It can't be changed much but it and the consequences can be made visible with counter-narratives that show to the public what's going on. Nowadays people just don't understand and thus let, for example, feminists utilize the ignorance. The red pill symbolizes this´pretty well, I think.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:33 PM
1

Try OECD's Better life index. It measures the quality of life, among other things, between the sexes. If I remember correctly in Sweden and the USA the equality gap was the biggest. Can't remember which country had the smallest. Using the index to create different charts is very easy.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:08 PM
1

You're still speaking about this as if it was a private thing when I'm trying to say that it can become an important part of politics and power dynamics in general. Where I live the "women's issues" have been among the most important issues for decades. They tend to be on every party's political agenda. And they can and have become laws or other official rules and practices. One reason for that is that they reflect the experiences of us all, particularly when we are in our formative years. One a…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:02 PM
3

What I tried to say is the it's not a private thing only. The sexual experiences during our formative years, in particular, make us what we are to a great extent. Many women become entitled, thinking that they have right to demand things from men and many men adapt to this to win favors. This then have an effect in every field of life, like politics. And this is just one example. Besides, we have to change dominant narratives if we want to have any change in private, public, official, or unoffic…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:01 AM
4

There are a lot powerful people who think that women are without a question worse off - or they pretend to believe it. That's why they can direct resources to help women and away from men's issues. In other words, feminists (as "representatives of women") have a huge amount of the kind of social capital that is associated with victims and those who suffer unfairly. There is much less, almost none, that kind of capital associated with men (or withe straight men, in particular). So, it's no surpri…
/r/MensRights01/09/17 08:19 AM
1

True anarchists are among the most productive and often most brilliant people in the world. Could give some examples. No great scientist (brilliance) or business man (productivity) comes to mind. I know a few artists and politicians/revolutionaries who have been anarchists - or at least flirted with it - but to call them "the most brilliant or productive" sounds like an exaggeration.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 08:00 AM
4

Actually, the sexual power imbalance is behind many other imbalances between the sexes. like many double standards. It should be discussed much more. Though I don't know if this is particularly great example, it's an example, nevertheless.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:28 AM
1

Another media giant that has to be won before media turns more objective and pro equality. [In August 2014, A&E Networks, a television group jointly owned by The Walt Disney Company and Hearst Corporation, made a $US250-million investment in Vice Media for an ownership stake of 10%\[13\]. In November and December 2015, Disney made two additional individual investments of US$200 million totaling $400 million.\[14\]\[15\] In June 2017, Vice secured a $450-million investment from private-equity fir…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:07 PM
13

These people feel so privileged that they think that they an go anywhere and say/write anything. Everybody that opposes their hate can be ignored as misogynists whom her circles hate anyway. It would be so nice if the reality would start hitting back even more and show that what what is OK within her feminist bubble isn't allowed among civilized and emphatic men and women, girls and boys.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 12:52 PM
6

Yeah, encourage boys to dress up in girls' clothes. Teenage girls - or boys for that matter - will despise and laugh at a teenage boy in a dress and high heels a few years later on. Though I'm all for making the male role broader, the government shouldn't tell boys that they are free, the same way the girls are, when it comes to breaking limits of your role.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:22 AM
13

It's a stupid idea that two men will write the screenplay. They must know that, if they make it realistic, they'll be crucified or at least criticized harshly by the conservative elite (SWJs, feminists.). So, in all likelihood, there's going to be a few evil roles (perhaps a few boys?) but the good girls will win them and live in harmony and prosperity. Yeah, sounds silly but what else could it be?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 09:50 AM
12

Arshia [the accuser] and the defendant, Mr. Premjee Did the court name the accused by his last name but the accuser just by her first name? If so, what's the deal with that? Sounds very unfair. The accused will have a stain on his reputation till the end of the Internet, though the same court decided he most likely did nothing wrong (except for being stupid and having drunken sex in a dorm).
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:02 AM
5

There are a lot of double standards that favor women. That's just one of those.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 05:44 AM
3

in this case Trudeau is right and the NDP is wrong, and the fact that the status of woman gag critic is using a feminist purity test to try and shame Trudeau into giving Kang the boot A harassment accusation is a handy tool that is now taken -partly - away from the feminists? That must be frustrating.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 04:08 AM
12

Next he'll be kicked out of the hospital because he doesn't have an insurance. Anyway, the sentences in the USA tend to be far too long. In Europe he would have been in prison for a couple of years and his life would not have gone totally down the drain.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 08:16 PM
8

It's a pretty good chart - if you just change he to she and she to he. Women, after all, are the ones who have more power in relationships (according to PEW), are more violent both physically and psychologically and so on.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:06 PM
2

I'ts excellent news if the new generation has learned to hate haters, isn't it? More clementine fords are needed! And soon there's gonna be a revolution, The Woman and her little male helpers are gonna get kicked out of the corridors of power.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 03:58 AM
2

They should rethink what "denial of denial" means, namely acceptance, denying nothing.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 03:14 PM
4

Most white boys didn't get any benefits in Britain two hundred years ago, or earlier. The conditions most of them lived in resembled Indian slums or dirt poor villages. Girls lived in the same kind of places but at least there was more empathy toward them and attempts to protect them from the ugliest hardships. Perhaps there was a short period around 150 to 40 years ago when men were better off, but even that is questionable.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:19 PM
5

They left out the third law for some reason. Who left out? At least now they're are all there. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 08:51 AM
1

But if there is no realistic possibility of sex then those men who aren't attractive enough just learn to live without. But if there are hookers, especially if you see them or their ads all the time, Then you won't learn. Instead could buy the first time and, if the hooker is good at her profession, you might get hooked - and exploited. It's not that far form getting hooked on drugs and then getting exploited by the dealer. (I understand that this isn't the only angle you can look at the issue, …
/r/MensRights28/08/17 05:39 PM
1

It's pretty useless to add a link to a Finnish interview but here it is anyway: https://areena.yle.fi/1-4199646
/r/MensRights28/08/17 04:25 PM
1

Drugs dealers get people addicted to drugs. How is sex the same? We men, or many of us, have a strong libido and biological urge to have sex with women but many have no way to satisfy that that urge - unlike women. It's not so far from a drug addiction, and a desperate need to have more after you have run out, that can be exploited, The interview is in Finnish, but here's the link anyway, perhaps there is a Finn reading this ; https://areena.yle.fi/1-4199646
/r/MensRights28/08/17 04:23 PM
3

It's supply and demand but the power dynamics favor women and a lot. It just struck me, when I listened to her, how extreme the imbalance really is. Two similar people with similar motives and goals, and one gets money and the other one loses money just because there is one big difference between them, their sex. And this is, of course, happening outside prostitution as well.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:06 PM
2

The problem is that women don't work 100% but about 80% of what men work (when they work full-time, of course in rich countries more an more women are working only part time.).
/r/MensRights27/08/17 07:07 PM
3

She's a feminst which means that she's probably either lying or don't know what she's talking about. That should always be the starting point when feminsts talk about men and women and their relationships. She probably doesn't know that there have been numerous hunter gatherer groups that have been studied since the 19th century. Almost every group later on have turned to agriculture. In most groups women gathered and men hunted, if women hunted it was never big game, as far as I know. Some grou…
/r/MensRights27/08/17 06:57 PM
0

It's funny how you say that Europeans turn Muslim into terrorists, like they have zero personal responsibility, lol. I said nothing of the kind, that would have been crazy. I described what terrorists want. And how stupid people don't understand it and play along.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 05:49 PM
1

LOL, it's very telling that they decided not to remove this. I'm pretty sure it's sarcasm but the mods probably think it's a good idea and in line with their cult's dogmas.
/r/MensRights27/08/17 05:27 AM
17

Women are the ones who keep men in their place perhaps more than anybody or anything else. They show young men with their choices which kind of men are attractive. And then these choices become part of the culture that everybody adapts to. A man dressing up in feminine clothes is not sexy in their eyes. He's worth pity and disrespect if even that. And then "everybody" starts thinking the same way. Another reason for the narrow role is that women are accepted into the society by being women but m…
/r/MensRights26/08/17 03:02 PM
3

Exactly. The article seems to blame some sort of "Muslim chauvinism" but that's not the case (though it's still unclear whether the Moroccan in Turku was just mentally sick and had a grudge against women, a 15 year old Syrian girl he stabbed - but did not kill - had been in the same school class with him). Terrorists are often looking for the maximum shock effect. They want to hurt those whose suffering brings about the greatest amount of grief, anxiety, and anger (besides small kids whom even t…
/r/MensRights26/08/17 02:40 PM
4

Where did the article mention "white middle class men"? Looks like a clickbait.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 07:27 AM
1

While I agree to some extent there's an other side to the story: we tend to think through narratives, and politics is often about whose narrative is the best. Nowadays one of the most influential narrative regarding men and women among the elite (politicians, big firms, bureaucrats, celebrities etc) tells that men have been and still are oppressors and women oppressed. There is a need for a more truthful and compassionate narrative. And that's what the article is trying to do.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 07:01 AM
1

Females can be indoctrinated to become lesbians but what about males, how do they leave patriarchy behind? Sex change operation, suicide? Total submission before feminist mistresses?
/r/MensRights26/08/17 06:37 AM
20

Should be illegal, at least in a company owned by the state.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 06:02 AM
4

So what’s going on here? Shouldn’t the sign read, “My DAD works here?” No, if the idea is to make people slow down. We do, after all, value women's safety much higher than men's safety, And mothers are even more valuable. Perhaps the only thing worth pondering (from this angle) is why they had a boy in the picture instead of a girl. Girls' "empathy value" is higher than that of boys'. Perhaps a girl in a safety helmet just didn't look right, removed too far from the reality?
/r/MensRights26/08/17 05:58 AM
14

The company is owned by three men. I'm pretty sure they are not going to cut their own wages or other earnings. After all, as entrepreneurs, they must think that they have earned every cent. Not because they are men, but because they have worked hard to make the firm succeed. That's hypocrisy, though. And the whole thing is clearly illegal. And the feminist organization, Unioni, to whom they are going to give the money is aggressive propaganda organization publishing crazy feminist bullshit. Any…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:26 PM
3

Something like 85%of their customers are women - though not all women believe the wage gap is real. Gays seem to be target customers, too.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:09 PM
1

Quite often prostitution is an alternative to crime. You don't have the money to buy drugs or buy food to your family etc. and get the money by "selling yourself". I'm quite sure that it's the reason why prostitution is legal (in most of the first world). If you think about it, it's often exploitation of those men who can't have sex. Furthermore it can spread diseases, break marriages, lead to frauds and blackmailing and have other antisocial consequences. And that's why it was earlier illegal i…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 08:50 AM
2

Excuse me, who got triggered? You're a joke. :D
/r/MensRights25/08/17 08:12 AM
2

Strange people get their kicks from the strangest things. Bye. :D
/r/MensRights25/08/17 08:05 AM
2

Lol! There a two kinds of ignorant people: those who know that they are ignorant and those who are so ignorant that they don't even know that they are ignorant. I'm sure you know which group you belong to. :D Read the links on the right and learn about science, logic, and critical thinking.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:55 AM
1

Are you retarded or just slow? I just gave you links. The thing you don't seem to understand is that MRA is based on facts (studies, surveys etc) unlike feminism. You're trying to play a game you can't win if I decided to argue with you.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:40 AM
2

I'm not here to enlighten ignorant people who don't want to do basic research for themselves - or even pause for a few minutes to think critically. But if you don't know how to look up sources an easy way to start can be found in the right hand side of the page: New to r/MensRights? Check out these links first! Frequently Asked Questions Reference book of Men's Issues By Dakr As for critical thinking, that's another problem. It can take years to unlearn all the bullshit you have been fed with si…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:32 AM
2

Your're a victim of official (conscription for example) and unofficial (education, for example) discrimination, double standards (STEM jobs vs. teaching jobs, for example) and negative stereotypes (men are violent predators. for example).
/r/MensRights25/08/17 07:17 AM
2

With regard to literacy, the difference in favour of girls was the largest in the OECD countries. Girls have consistently outperformed boys in terms of literacy, but this gap has slightly narrowed. Girls and boys have long been performing equally well in natural sciences. According to the latest PISA results the gender difference in natural sciences favours girls and is the largest in the OECD countries. They fail to say that it's not just the OECD but all countries, 41 and even more in earlier …
/r/MensRights25/08/17 06:59 AM
1

Oh, I was, there aren't 10 but 30 days in a month. :D A year would take up perhaps 300 gb (or less depending on the quality.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 05:26 AM
2

What does it mean? Are all male birds or mammals rapists, too, or is this specific to men?
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:06 PM
3

In Turku a crazy terrorist stabbed last week eight women killing two (because attacking women has a bigger shock value). In addition he stabbed two men who tried to protect and help women. Also, each and everyone of those who fought and chased him were men. Also those civilians who helped the injured were almost all men (though nurses are mostly women). Also professional helpers were mostly men (paramedics, policemen).
/r/MensRights24/08/17 11:55 AM
12

'Weak' parents are raising a generation of 'prince boofhead' boys Or are they: He said it was still a small proportion of boys who fit the "prince boofhead" category Hah, they can't keep their lies coherent even in a short article.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 10:32 AM
6

wage: a fixed regular payment earned for work or services, typically paid on a daily or weekly basis [though hourly wages are often used in honest, non-feminist studies]. earnings: money obtained in return for labour or services
/r/MensRights24/08/17 07:17 AM
6

She's been a feminist since the 80s and don't know that feminist arguments can't be discussed in a public forum (because they are lies and half-truths). How ignorant can you be! But then again the shaming tactics and the woman card she had learned, so perhaps she's not altogether hopeless.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 06:55 AM
1

What about this scenario: 3-4 days of recordings take up about 1 GB, a month about 10 GB , and a year about 100 GB. And if you recorded "only" 12 hours a day 100 GB could store 2 years. That isn't much on modern hard disks. So, you could build a system that stored to you own hard disk via a cloud service which would encrypt the recordings so that the user couldn't tamper with the files. Perhaps a bit far-fetched, but it could work - for rich athletes and such people, though they could naturally …
/r/MensRights24/08/17 06:20 AM
3

Unfortunately, there's no app for it unless you're a cab driver or in another job where your whereabouts are always known. If there was, for other men, it would record everything, when on, put a time stamp on the recording and, preferably send the recording to a cloud in real time. With an app like that you'd have a chance.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 04:39 AM
30

Young women are paid more because they are better educated and firms want to recruit them for diversity reasons. In other words, boys and young men are discriminated against by both the education system and employers.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 04:15 AM
0

It's an arms race, a vicious circle, when everybody starts to have guns and are expecting each other to use deadly force. It's useless to ask in a situation like that who started the race. It's a well known fact and explains a great deal of why there are more gun violence in certain places (like Columbia or the USA) than other places (like most of Northern Europe). Or why the police kills more people if guns are common and people are ready to use deadly force.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 07:23 PM
-11

The logic goes that if you're a burglar and you break into a house and don't expect that you're gonna get shot, then you'll just run when you see the owner. But if you break in expecting to be shot if caught, you'll gonna have a gun with you and try to shoot before the owner. The same goes for any confrontations between criminals and the police. Where I live the police very rarely kill anybody and so the policemen don't get shot either. I don't know about the burglary statistics either but the l…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 06:20 PM
7

Yeah, the court would determine whether the threat was real at least here in Finland. If not, you'd get jail time or probation.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:59 PM
1

In many countries there is less violence because nobody's usually using deadly force, neither the police, the civilians nor the criminals. The expected escalation of violence just isn't there most of the time.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:51 PM
27

I suppose you could end up in jail if you did that in Britain?
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:47 PM
1

These days it can often seem that having a gender studies degree won’t help you find a job when you graduate, unless you wish to become a sales assistant, a teacher or an academic. They forgot the professional feminist and hater working for a feminist or other powerful organization. But it seems scary that teacher is one of the jobs they mentioned. And why on earth someone would like to have a feminist sales assistant?
/r/MensRights23/08/17 09:31 AM
2

Not long after Parker’s arrest, her husband Jamie, who also taught at the school and was the boys’ basketball coach, was charged with having sex sex romp with a female student.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 06:12 AM
1

Sorry, I don't know how I missed that.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:57 AM
7

The person who wrote the title is in all likelihood a feminist who have been indoctrinated to believe that sexism against men is impossible. So, instead of comparing her dogmas with reality, she changes reality to conform to the dogmas.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:49 AM
2

Stereotypes tell usually something about the probability of a trait or behavior. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_probability In some cases the stereotype is about a likelihood that's 100% or very close to it (fat people like to eat and/or drink). And sometimes close to 0% (Muslims are terrorists - though it's useful that the police still regard Muslims in certain situations as more likely to be terrorists than any other group). I don't think that the study was about men liking sports but …
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:42 AM
1

The biggest problem for her was that she had to wait till the sun went down, though. That problem could be solved with a very primitive toilet. When I was in the army we dug a hole in the ground and build a pole structure to sit on next to it. But, yeah, that works only if you have a lot of forest around you. If you don't, your yard is going to be a big shit hole soon.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 06:29 PM
1

I find it hard to believe that there are sewers in a typical Indian village - or slum. We used to have an outhouse in our summer place all through my childhood. And I participated in emptying it a few times. But we used calcium, so it wasn't that bad. The poor in India couldn't probably afford calcium. And we had two holes in the outhouse so that you could go there with somebody else, hah. A cousin of mine was a very good friend and we often went together when we were kids. Back in the day there…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:23 PM
0

Well, what else I'm supposed to say? There was no civil war, you are wrong, I am right. If you want to find out what really happened the easiest way is googling. If you are trolling I really don't see what you're getting out of these silly claims and me answering and I really don't want to find out either. That's why this is the end my friend. And try Google.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:15 PM
7

In 2001 the guardian could still publish articles criticizing the culture of the elite.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:06 PM
-1

Try Google, it often helps when you're confused.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:53 PM
0

LOL, I have a degree in history and the Nazi history has been my hobby for decades. There was no civil war in Germany, I have no idea what you are talking about. Are you trolling?
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:33 PM
-1

The German civil war of the 30's Come on, there was no civil war in Germany. There were some socialist and "right-wing" uprisings right after the WWI but they were local and didn't last long. And Bolsheviks being Jewish is Nazi propaganda.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:22 PM
1

I think he was supposed to build an outhouse and that's easy if you just manage to get enough planks, or even tree trunks.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:12 PM
2

What!?
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:30 PM
7

Sure, but if they have a problem that they want to get fixed and the men in their lives won't fix it, why don't they fix it themselves, like build toilets. Perhaps there are cultural barriers or something that make it difficult for Indian women to build toilets. In that case I understand it - and would expect the government and aid organizations to try to break the barriers, empower women to take their fate in their own hands. Trying to force men to build toilets, on the other hand, by granting …
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:31 AM
7

Sure, but why don't women build toilets. It's not that difficult. And if it's too difficult shouldn't they empower themselves, form toilet building teams, found study groups. Actually, this is an honest question: why do women expect men to do these kinds of essential things that are in their interest? Even here where I live, though the country is supposed to be about the most equal in the world (which isn't true because men are in many ways much more worse off), women expect that men build and r…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 06:58 AM
6

This is among the biggest problems the first world countries are facing, but there are no dynamics, almost no discussions that could even start to solve the problem. More and more men are getting marginalized, more and more men aren't reaching their full potential, more and more men think that they don't have an equal opportunity to study and fulfill their dreams. And men are the more productive sex - when everything goes well. But they are also the more costly and even dangerous sex - when ever…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:38 AM
7

empathy tends to be "uniquely female" I don't think that's humor, more like bigotry. I feel really sorry for her son, women like this should not have children, and sons in particularly. Think about it, she seems to be saying that her son can't probably feel empathy! What a crazy feminist bigot! And starting firms that answer to the basic needs (like moving around or having a place to stay) isn't the most obvious think to strive for but an obsession with mothers. She's stupid too!
/r/MensRights22/08/17 05:19 AM
8

The right way to do an essay - or at least a research paper - in this kind of a situation is to put the wage gap theory into a test: If women are paid less because of their sex then the wage gap should be found constantly across all working women. If it's not (and it is not) there's something wrong with the theory. Single women, for example, earn a lot more than single men, lesbians earn more than straight women, young women earn more than young men in many places etc. Another angle is to define…
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:56 AM
26

The Jewish worldwide conspiracy is very real. Your problem is that you haven't found sources. Nazis have written about the conspiracy a lot since 1920s. Read Mein Kampf.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:23 AM
3

$230,000 bail sounds like it.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:58 AM
13

In addition, and this is not going to be PC, my wife and some of my girlfriends before her and pretty many girls and women in general can have pretty radical mood swings. I've been hit by a female person at least twice without any other apparent reason than that she all of a sudden started to feel angry - and was a bit drunk. Things got better with my wife when I started to look after that she got something to eat regularly. Believe it or not. Low blood sugar and PMS could change her personality…
/r/MensRights21/08/17 06:46 AM
4

The chart paints men's problems with a bit too dark colors here and there. You don't, for example, have to work out several hours a day to achieve "optimal physical attractiveness". Stay-at home dads aren't shamed, not in the Nordic countries, anyway (perhaps they are in some parts of the USA, though). In DV situations the police tries to find out who's the perpetrator (at least in many European countries) though they might favor women nevertheless. If some problems get exaggerated it's easy to …
/r/MensRights21/08/17 05:52 AM
21

Putin is restricting the freedom of speech which is never a good idea. You can theorize about exceptions, but, in the end, it's never a good idea.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 07:37 AM
1

That's crazy even by North-European standards. Raping a child would get you at least a couple of years behind the bars over here. Well, for a man, I don't know what they would do to a woman.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 07:30 AM
3

Hard to believe it's 81% even in the USA. About 15 years ago it was 79% and since then the percentage has been going down.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 07:25 AM
1

It's not that people are stupid - you'll get used to it - but when they are proud of their stupidity, that still gets to me.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 07:21 AM
37

The strange thing is that women are more violent - according to meta-analyses - in relationships, particularly if it's a lesbian relationship.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 08:05 PM
2

Something like it, a 18 year old kid from Morocco. A true terrorist: started by - first buying an ice cream and then - focusing on a mom with a tram and then killing her by stabbing her in the back. Then lots of dark-skinned men rushed to rescue - plus a few Finns. I happened to be just a couple of blocks a away and heard the shot. I wondered later on what i would have done: fight, run - or pick my cellphone and start filming.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 06:53 PM
2

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/europe/finland-stabbing/index.html
/r/MensRights19/08/17 05:32 AM
1

In about 90% of the cases the children end up with the mother, though. At least in Finland. That's because parents agree on it. If they can't agree, the custody is usually shared by a court order. But this can't be the whole picture. There are too many fathers claiming that they have been treated wrong. And perhaps Finland isn't Scandinavia, hard to say.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:01 AM
32

Boys need male teachers to look up to. Schools and teachers need to stop discriminating against boys. If the article had mentioned these facts it would have been better. But not altogether bad as it is.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 02:08 PM
10

Well, it's Queer science journal (queer: strange or odd from a conventional viewpoint; unusually different; of a questionable nature or character; suspicious; shady).
/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:00 PM
10

A bright girl should understand that if you want a husband you don't study gender studies. There are no real men studying it and toxic ideas about men and marriage start to creep into your head.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 04:10 PM
1

The data is from 2003. It's worse nowadays - but I'm sure correcting measures are going to start any day now.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 02:52 PM
6

I'm moved.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 02:28 PM
1

You shouldn't hate yourself. You can't change anything right now, not your past, nor you future. You are what you are right now and there's no way you could be something or somebody else. So, love the person you have to be, forgive him, value him. Don't think you're a failure. Because you are what you are, the best possible you in this universe right now. Concentrate on that at first. The time for a change will come, but first you have to forgive and love yourself. Right now when everything is a…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:36 PM
2

What I mean is that if I go to r/Feminism there are ads the the right hand side, but there are never any ads there when I'm here (r/MensRights).
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:57 PM
5

I'm sure she hasn't attacked feminist studies, though they are almost always clearly biased. Instead she attacks the science of white men, in other words, perhaps about 90% of the whole body of science. What she is saying, really, is that we should not trust that part of science, because ... well, apparently the rules of science don't apply when it's done by devilish white men. After all, they want just to oppress, not study nature and be objective. She's just like a high-school kid whose femini…
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:12 PM
-1

They'll freak out and call the cops. The doodle suggestion looks a bit militant. MRAs must be humble, non-threatening, not even looking at women.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 12:42 PM
3

So, Jim harasses women because Joe lost his job? Or is it that Joe is allowed to come to his former workplace just to dominate women? Dear Dan, I think you should still work a bit on your logic.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:58 AM
12

Being a young adult is hellish enough without the added burden of being demonized by society. Growing up in poverty, I saw the difference a mentor could make. What we should, really should be talking is not women in STEM but men in educational professions. Who cares if the code was done by a vagina person or not. But male teachers are perhaps the most important thing when, or if, we try to stop the equality gap from widening.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:33 AM
1

Perhaps.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:28 AM
4

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:20 AM
11

Even this guy couldn't write the article without referring to THE GREAT OPPRESSION: "women do face discrimination of many kinds". Of course he had no source to back it up because it's not true.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 10:19 AM
3

An interesting thought. We know that girls and (young) women are attracted to a small group of "alpha males". The rest goes more or less unnoticed. They don't matter. Could it be that the same mechanism works outside the sexual field? Are garbagemen invisible, more like things or tools than real men? I've never thought it that way ... sounds a bit over the top, I must admit.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:16 AM
10

And yet, they have ads, we don't. Does that mean that MensRights is "officially" considered too improper? I suppose it does. r/Feminism has ads, too! Tells a lot about who and what is in power, too. You can be crazy, propagandist, and hateful as long as you belong to the power elite or they like your ideology.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:27 AM
8

In Finland during the WWII there were all kinds of women - young and a bit older, attractive and not so attractive - serving as nurses close to the frontier. Sometimes they got injured or killed in a bombing or a surprise attack by the enemy. The war censorship had explicitly ordered that the deaths of those women should not be made public because that would have lowered the morale, caused unrest among the civilians and soldiers. It was not about attractive women. It was about the idea of any wo…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:19 PM
14

Today I learned that portraying a troubled man as a sexist pig is sexist toward women.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:01 PM
1

You can order normal coffee or, if you're an anti-globalist (or whatever), pay a bit more and order fair-trade coffee. That's called targeting (or price discrimination but let's not go into details) and businesses are free to target their services to whomever they want to (if it's legal, that is). Stupid customers aren't illegal and neither are businesses taking advantage of them.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:22 AM
2

Perhaps the context was yet another double standard. But then again I'm not sure I understand what you're saying ... you're thoughts seem to float like pigment in a fluid. :D
/r/MensRights15/08/17 07:16 AM
6

A few rules I've tried to follow: Don't say negative things about other people in the social media (unless you have a very good reason that could stand up in court). Don't talk about your kids in the social media at all, unless you're absolutely sure the kid would approve what's been told. Don't foster negative attitudes toward your kids, instead try to talk about the conflicts and show that you love them. Don't treat your kids like they were representatives of a group (like "the boys" or "the l…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:59 AM
1

Perhaps about 1,5% of men are asexual (and far more women) says Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:08 PM
68

They don't know about it. Feminists usually know very little about the real-life inequalities between the sexes. They usually just know about "theoretical" problems that usually don't appear outside their heads and discussions.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:58 PM
10

Many people would read it and think: “Well, it’s a bit awkward, definitely not politically correct, but pretty reasonable and well researched.” This was my first reaction, so I researched the topic. After a couple of hours following links and reading papers, I found the strongest scientific evidence: males and females do have psychological differences, but most of them are due to society, not biology. LOL, the writer must be a comedian! "I had never ever thought about this but now I decided to f…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:33 PM
1

Feminists always hate the men of their own country the most, they are the most evil among the evil.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:10 PM
1

If they hadn't fired him there could have been all kinds of lawsuits by feminist-minded employees waiting around the corner. British experts probably don't understand this.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:10 AM
31

If there are all kinds of people involved - from left to right, for example - how do you censor the opinions from the right without becoming like the Feminist movement which polices everything that is said?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 08:42 AM
0

LOL :D My point can be read in the title.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 12:27 PM
2

The "diversity theory" says that homogeneous groups find it harder to think outside their own box and that a homogeneous group don't know about the wants and needs of other groups. I think it's a pretty valid point (though perhaps not so obvious than has been claimed lately - after all we used to have all male companies in the past that made pretty amazing things - for women, too - and we still have organizations that are pretty homogeneous but work fine, like the military in many countries).
/r/MensRights12/08/17 07:06 AM
-2

Perhaps it only seems so. Most of the hateful "articles" are actually columns. And the hateful texts get often reposted here over and over again. Men, women, and the relationship between the sexes are very often, almost always, described so that the picture favors women, that's true, but it doesn't mean that the picture is actually hateful toward men. Contemptuous, often yes, indifferent, yes, ignorant, yes, but rarely hateful. And I think that it has been getting better during the past 10-15 ye…
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:56 AM
0

I haven't said it's a hate movement. Get your facts straight!
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:18 AM
2

Most of what she said is so self-evident that it made yawn. But all generations have to learn these things again and again because nobody tells young people about them but offer an opposite narrative AKA bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:10 PM
1

You're saying that I cant tell the difference between a fact and an opinion. You're entitled to your opinion. Let me just say that i have studied feminism for about then years and read several books and all kinds of reports, blogs and what not. I know what is a fact and what is an opinion.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:01 PM
7

I'd say it's something that has been going on as long as there have been men: you bond by telling how somebody else has done something evil. Every group seem to need a "good enemy" to tighten the bonds between the members and to define the moral boundaries of the group. What's new is the Internet which has made this mechanism so much bigger and more hysteric. Sometimes - or actually quite often - you can see it in this sub, too. The "regressives", who hold dear the dominant values of the current…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:41 PM
2

It's a letter to the editor, isn't it, not a NYT columnist? it's not an NYT article, anyway
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:08 PM
1

If this means that perhaps 10% of the military is not combat-ready (because of the lowered fitness requirements), the rest have to take their place in the battle field. The 10% will then serve behind the lines. Seems somehow unfair and demoralizing.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:57 PM
3

This is something that has been known for only a couple of thousands of years, so I'll expect that something is done to it very soon.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:33 PM
0

Most of the core ideological claims are lies or hateful interpretations of the society. That's just a fact, don't blame me!
/r/MensRights11/08/17 04:58 PM
2

Favoring women for leadership roles will never probably end if the current social dynamics and political ideologies won't. Namely, women won't give up the privilege of being able to choose between two lifestyles. That's why the number of possible female bosses will be smaller than that of men. At the same time companies will try all they can to get good enough female bosses but can't. (And there are other reasons as well why the number of female leadership applicants will be smaller also in the …
/r/MensRights10/08/17 05:39 PM
4

Close to the janitors they even had their two cleaners there.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:58 PM
6

For women it's easier because they have much more freedom to make choices, do what they want: they can decide to have sex, they can choose what to study, nowadays they have many more alternatives then men where to work, they can stay home, if they like it they can choose what to wear they can choose where to live, if they have financial troubles, there are legal solutions for them, in certain troubles they can solve it themselves or ask a man to solve it, they can have the kids or not in a divor…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:30 PM
2

Didn't I just say that? The same employment rate is seen as a sign of equality and so is the chance to study freely (and more than men) and in those places women gravitate towards what they like and away from STEM.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:06 PM
35

The best liked comment: I work in tech and read his missive in full. What bothered me about his use of statistics was a blindness to the context that led to findings like "Women on average look for more work-life balance while men have a higher drive for status on average". That's not a choice, that's an engineered circumstance based on a single-breadwinner model which has evolved into a bias where women are paid less than their male counterparts and expected to stay home with children while a m…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:40 PM
1

Does somebody still believe in the blank slate? All literature and all conversations I've read or heard during the past 10 years or so seem to suggest that the idea has gone pretty much extinct. Now the "social construct people" go like: nobody is of course denying that inherit traits can have an effect ... but we must remember that the effect is often hugely exaggerated". While the opposite side, evolutionary psychology guys, say pretty much the opposite. What they seem to agree on is that neit…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:52 AM
6

I suppose the situation has only become worse since then? Women are taught more and more to look for sexism and discrimination -and find it even when it doesn't exist. Suing is often very profitable for women, especially class suits. Men are blind to sexism or are afraid of a backlash. I mean, a man blaming a woman for sexism could easily end up in trouble himself. By 1997, when I wrote my book, there were already dozens of reported cases in which liability claims cited anti-feminist statements,…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:51 AM
5

Feminism is not about what's true. It's about what good for the movement and ideology, sometimes even women. They admit it themselves, though not in texts that are aimed to non-feminists or laymen in general. They are ready to lie if they can that way hurt men, too.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 08:24 PM
1

Very poor journalism. Just nameless sources who obviously have an ax to grind. Could be true but sounds fabricated, at least the interview format.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 08:16 PM
12

Men work on average more than women already. So, what's fair, even more work for men? For feminists the answer is yes, naturally.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:43 PM
6

Creating computer science and being an early programmer aren't the same thing, though. It was a collective effort by many people and groups.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:02 PM
6

Among feminists, they also despise living in your childhood home and having neckbeards. Strange folks indeed.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:58 PM
17

Dan Eaton, an employment lawyer, in San Diego wrote on CNBC: “Federal labour law bars even non-union employers like Google from punishing an employee for communicating with fellow employees about improving working conditions … California law prohibits employers from threatening to fire employees to get them to adopt or refrain from adopting a particular political course of action.” He also said” “It is unlawful for an employer to discipline an employee for challenging conduct that the employee r…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:49 PM
16

Governments use schools as their most important tool when leveling the playing field. Now, if everything is easier for men, surely the education system must favor them, level the playing field more for them. But no, actually they are favoring women, so that the faculties women like are turning almost all female. In most universities women make the majority. And when there still is higher education with a male majority governments are spending huge resources to end the situation. There is somethi…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:28 PM
2

The best reason why he got sacked was that he was a senior employee and didn't know that you just should shut up when it comes to women and their privileges. If you still want speak up, do it anonymously.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:05 PM
2

Obviously not.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:01 PM
3

I try to avoid helping women but it's sometimes hard because they are weaker and you are stronger. It's hard to look at a women trying, for example, to lift or carry something that is heavy for them but would be light for me without having the urge to help. Or seeing a women who freezes because they are smaller and I am bigger and could easily offer my jacket. But then I just look the other way or walk away.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:39 PM
-2

I know about these things a lot and unfortunately Google is superior, in particular if you are in the net business and use other languages than just English.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 05:38 PM
-7

I'd like to deny Google's access to my information - but let's face it, the products are superior. Perhaps they'll be my masters soon and make me kill myself because I'm male. But before that I had had good time with all kinds of free and amazing things. :D Then again, perhaps the things won't be so amazing soon if they make their company a university campus favoring women in everything.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:10 PM
1

Finland's.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 06:01 AM
12

Women, of course, won't end up in the prison as easily as men. And if they do, they'll get shorter sentences and end up in better places (though lesbian rapes are much more common in prisons than what we are led to believe by the feminist narrative that don't want to see women as rapists). And then they get sympathy. Most women claim that they didn't do anything wrong and even if they did it was because a man, an abusive father, a manipulative boyfriend etc. And we want so much to believe it. Bu…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:12 PM
1

Furthermore WOMEN, not only ideological sexists, will tell that they don't want their children or themselves be in the hands of men when they are more or less helpless. It will never change. We just have to come up with a society that has such jobs for men that don't put then in contact with women and children.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 06:37 PM
1

I could appreciate if that happened in schools - and perhaps it does.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 05:48 PM
2

There is an Israeli study saying that women (or men) are a problem because men want to protect them instead of concentrating on the task at hand. I think that's exactly how it is, never mind how well women can perform. Meaning that even the best women could be a threat to you and your task. But then again I served in peace time so I don't know about the dynamics in war. There were excellent women there but the men were, in a sense the problem. I caught myself pondering things like "should I offe…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:57 AM
2

That man has never fucked a virgin. If he had he'd know better. It's biology, giving virgin women an edge in the game of love. But does Virgin as a company exist or is it a patriarchal fantasy? My advice to this man is to contemplate that 10 000 km high up in the air. That could give an injection of reality into his thinking.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:52 AM
2

Yeah, when the government allies with haters against the weak (who are always guilty in the "just" narrative) that's what it looks like. And, sorry to say, the problem seems to be North-American. At least in Europe the hysterical mentality never seems to get that strong nowadays, be it feminist/sexist or racist. And I don't like the way the, by the way, how the article gives credit to the hysteria: not part of the solution but problem.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 10:32 AM
2

Perhaps the best reason to hate feminism is that they have spread propaganda about men's violence against women and how women are not violent. How many boys and even girls - and men, of course - have died because of this hateful lie? How many have suffered just because there are powerful people and organizations who want to spread lies? I've studied Nazi-Germany and, yeah, there are alarming similarities (though differences, too, of course). There are always people who love to hate and spread th…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 09:20 AM
1

"Even two thirds of the accusations are false". Unfortunately nobody has so far found a way to machine translate well between Finnish and English (because Finnish belongs to another language group), but you can try I suppose. Or I could translate, let's see. Could be worth it.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 08:43 AM
3

Diversity (in the ways of thinking, for example) can't be tolerated because of diversity. Can you get more ironic? Or ridiculous? Feminism is way too powerful. Instead of letting people exchange their ideas freely, the first thing you have to consider is how feminists (or SJWs or women who have bought the idea of "women first") might feel about it. People, even anti-feminists, participate in it or let this happen because we are hardwired to think about women's welfare and love more than almost a…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 08:20 AM
13

“If it weren’t for these videos I don't know what I would have done,” Premjee told Inside Edition. You'd in a fucking prison. Whats wrong with the kids nowadays? No reason to be confused. Without the video somebody would be probably thrusting his dick into your ass in the shower room.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:20 PM
0

A lot of them are Jewish, if we talk about the elite schools in New York. Can a Jewish person have a white guilt? The Jewish woman I referred to just wanted a life outside the elite circles there - although I'm quite sure she's going to accept all the millions after her parents die. But then again, who knows? Perhaps she doesn't.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:09 PM
2

There is no way of knowing, but apparently most of the accusations are false nowadays if the criteria (or is it "criterium" as my Latin teacher would have said) is criminal intention. Misunderstanding and demonizing men, as in many surveys. make the share much higher, of course.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 12:59 PM
2

According to the police of Helsinki, Finland, over 50% of rape accusations are false. Nowadays, when people (both men and women according to their official FB page) for example first have sex and then the next day regret it or otherwise think that what happened should not have happened though there is no criminal action or intent involved.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 12:49 PM
2

Once, in my younger days, I dreamed of moving from this cold country to the sunny Australia. Then I heard that they don't want me (like they still wanted people from Europe a few years earlier). Then I learned about the spiders and snakes and was make-believe happy that I didn't emmigrate. Now when I have learned about the feminists there I'm honestly happy. ;) My niece moved to Australia, by the way, but she's a very attractive young woman, so you can guess how that worked out, how she got the …
/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:52 AM
2

Their female customers, if it's a place for young professional city dwellers, probably earn more than men because they are better educated (on average according to FACTS). So, they are giving a privilege to people who already are better off and discriminating against people who are worse off. Well, that's feminism for you, is somebody surprised?
/r/MensRights05/08/17 09:31 AM
3

Probably a hoax trying to get some money from the rich kids. And not that bad a hoax: those kids usually have problems because they are so rich and could give money to clear the consciousness a bit. It's only later on when, most of them, learn to live with the money they've inherited etc. (But I know from experience that some of them never do - it's a strange thing.)
/r/MensRights05/08/17 09:22 AM
1

In all civilized countries there are laws on when a person is not capable of deciding what's good for her or him. In Spain, for example the legal age to have sex with adults used to 12 years but then the government decided that 16 is better. There aren't any absolutely right rules, but I think that even you think that the age should be over 10 perhaps? That a 9 or 4 year old should not be given the right to decide if she or he wants to have sex ... or if an old person suffering from severe demen…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 09:11 AM
3

As a side note, I asked in Quora why people think that women are worse off when it's obvious, when you look at th life quality statistics, that they are not. The question was deleted because it broke the "be nice policy". It so stupid that it's hilarious. But the dark side is that it tells a lot about the power of feminism which thrives on lies. I decided to never go back.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 09:01 AM
1

I happen to live in a country where violence in public places is very rare. Nevertheless women tell in surveys that they are very much afraid when walking alone and in dark. The main reason must be feminism which has told women through women's magazines and otherwise that there are lots of violence and that all women have to be afraid of men. I hate feminism because it hurts, not only men, but women too.And it undermines the trust between people which is the glue of a civilized society.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 06:18 AM
1

If they can make money they are. The problem is that people can like unjust, even catastrophically unjust narratives.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:55 PM
1

It must be a comedy site ...
/r/MensRights04/08/17 05:30 PM
2

Men and helpless female and young patients ... will it ever work?
/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:58 PM
1

Not where I live - but, yeah, I, like every man I suppose, adept so that I don't look threatening. Actually, now in my fifties, I have pretty much stopped talking to women I don't know, let alone smiling etc.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:23 PM
2

Feminism was pretty dominant within "traditional" politic parties in northern Europe earlier than in the USA as far as I know. That's why, i suppose, the countries up here are more feminist.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:18 PM
1

Exactly. Media is always trying to find an angle that's newsworthy AKA new, unexpected, scoop material.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:30 AM
4

It should be 31%, not 13%, according to OP. If corrected, please disregard.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:25 AM
4

There really should be an ironic saying like "but doesn't anybody think about the girls!" (ironic because, naturally, they are the most important big demographic whose wellbeing everybody is thinking about, well, perhaps after children).
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:22 AM
6

A "prominent feminist" and we are supposed to believe her?! By default the preconception must be that a feminist lies because it's so common among them. But of course threatening a child, if it happened to be true, is sick, only sick men or women would disagree.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:18 AM
2

According to Jo Hemmings, a behavioural psychologist and dating coach, there are an estimated seven new women for every man on the dating scene in the 40-55 age group What? WHAT? I suppose she means that there aren't men the women find eligible? Otherwise that doesn't make sense. Sure, men die younger but, heh, not that much younger and not that many. Our culture is SO delusional when it comes to women, men, and their relationships. If only we had a movement that could tell people, especially gi…
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:54 PM
6

The difference is that I find it very hard, almost impossible, to imagine a father doing this to a little girl. But when a woman does its ... I think about the possibility that she's just one of those women who - inspired by feminism perhaps - think men and even young boys are perverts unless proven otherwise. Men, or fathers at least, never think that 9 year old girls are nothing but fine if not lovable. But this is speculation. Perhaps almost no women think that way. It's just that I have beco…
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:04 PM
3

Actually I read about it in a Finnish "yellow" news site (Como I think). Perhaps they got it from your post, though. It seems that sombody's following this sub there alright.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:39 PM
3

Those people who want more men out of universities won't sympathize with her because she's defending a male student. She's a "pattered" woman without own will and will remain so.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:35 AM
2

These women who "need somebody to love" but are feminists and more or less despise men should become lesbians. There is evidence that it's not that hard for women (unlike men who are much more hardwired, unfortunately, and will probably buy these sexbots to the end of times then when they are as life-like as in Westworld).
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:54 AM
1

Perhaps somebody has the guts to read this through, I haven't: https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/wikileaks-cables-saudi-princes-throw-parties-boasting-drink-drugs-and-sex/ http://thenewrevolution.net/2016/08/qatari-princess-caught-orgy-7-men-qatari-embassy-offers-50-mil-paper-kill-story/
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:55 PM
5

It's a feminist study. The only thing worth pondering is how did they rig it.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 07:23 AM
9

Feminism is in the corridors of power, MRA is in the marginal corners of the Internet.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 07:13 AM
1

Most women, in my experience. don't buy that narrative. They know that they don't have to be beautiful, and it's their choice if they decide to strive for it. The same goes for men. But if a woman decides to go along she'll get huge benefits: admiration, friendliness, better health and so forth. If a man plays along the benefits aren't that obvious: a "manly" man is often seen as a threat, competition, and manly man's life choices must aim at self-sacrifice for the benefit of others, women and c…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 07:07 AM
12

I remember when in the eighties Arab princes sometimes rented whole hotels in Riviera, Ibiza or places like that for their harems (I was a beach bum for a couple of years and lived in those places and can't really remember where this was taking place, but it was seen as normal and common by the locals). A young man looked at the hotels and wondered what was going on behind the closed walls. Is that still going on, I wonder. Or have they more secure places for their orgies - if that's what went o…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 06:47 AM
2

Misandry seems to be a thing indeed.. Got mislead by the OP and poor Englis skills.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:22 PM
1

Your problem is that you don't know what you don't know. Unknown unknowns. It's impossible to explain somebody what E=mc² means if that person doesn't have clue what E, and M and c stand for. This is the end of this crazy "conversation".
/r/MensRights01/08/17 11:10 PM
0

Consider learning the basics before the next time, pretty much nothing you say makes any sense for an economist like me. :)
/r/MensRights01/08/17 08:03 PM
1

The fact that the price went up (for the most valuable workers) doesn't mean that it wasn't the market price. What I'm saying here is almost like a tautology: in a competitive market you have to pay the market price. That's the big picture though sometimes a firm can pay more for a short while - or employ for example women even when they are less qualiffied - until the competition forces it to pay the market price. But that's not what happened here. Once again: how can people not understand it? …
/r/MensRights01/08/17 07:19 PM
1

I could say many things because I've had a similar experience but let me say just this: sex isn't that important, it's just another of those sometimes unfortunate things that can happen to people especially when they're young. It's not that important. You can get over it pretty easily in my experience, you don't have to dwell on it for years.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:56 PM
6

“These findings reinforce the need for policies aiming at reducing gender inequalities as we show that consequences go beyond the labor market and income inequalities,” Just remember not to do anything about the discrimination against men in schools, their shorter lives, dangerous, unhealthy jobs, the huge discrepancies in prison population, alcoholism, homelessness and so forth. WE JUST DON't CARE and fortunately neither do politicians.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:44 PM
8

Many feminists are proud misandrists. The funny think is that they believe that misogyny is rampant and misandrism is not a thing. (I wonder when Chrome will know misandrism is a thing and not a misspelling.)
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:29 PM
1

This is going beyond crazy. It supports "my argument" - or actually 200 years worth of economic and scientific thinking - by stating the simple fact that Ford paid the market price. The market price, when we talk about wages, is usually the price by which you can get employees you want and keep them (or actually the marginal price of the "last" employee but let's not go into technicalities when you don't even understand the basics). And I'm definitely no honey of uneducated persons like you. ;)
/r/MensRights01/08/17 04:21 PM
1

Yes, of course you're right. Ford is paying much more than other auto manufactures ... no? Hmmm. I do find it extremely difficult to understand people who in their own lives pay for goods what they are worth but have for some weird reason a fetish to think that the firms don't. Yes feminists are stupid and are expected to say foolish things, but otherwise sane people .... Here's, by the way, the real story. Ford paid the market price for his workers. Of course.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 03:37 PM
3

MRAs are somewhere between Nazis and Satan. Haters gonna hate.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:45 PM
1

Yes, people - or entrepreneurs who are people too - want the best quality for their money. Once again, what I'm saying has a 2-300 years of - often brilliant - thinking behind it. It's almost as certain as it is that gravity exists that people don't pay in a competitive market more than what the good is worth. People as individuals might and do but the market doesn't pay more to a man who says he has five kids. And the market is always right in the long run. Why? Because you are selfish. And so …
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:39 PM
1

And next to the facts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_world_product
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:09 PM
0

Yes, we try to get the best value for our money when we shop, the same way as we do if we are entrepreneurs and pay salaries. It's all about demand, supply, and the marginal cost. You have to elaborate on what you don't understand. Unless you do, I can't explain.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:05 PM
1

For most rich countries the slowing down has happened - not "in recent decades" but - in the last ten years or so. "The triumph of feminism", meaning men opting out or falling behind started to be a dominant force at the same time. Marriages getting rarer, children too, In poor countries the increase of young men should have meant rapidly growing GDPs. But it haven't. Instead single men are emmigrating to Europe from poor countries, and to the USA and even places like Russia (which is a country …
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:47 PM
1

And still the growth has been slowing down. I'm not saying that it's all because of men not working or working less. But it obviously is happening. The number of young men is bigger than ever and, yet, the growth is slowing down. In rich countries the share of men not marrying is growing, the number of children is decreasing, hell, testosterone is falling and semen. In poor countries there are more young men than ever and there is no future for them, no families, no future.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:19 PM
0

It's beyond reasonable that all men are married. Or that all married men would collude in order to get more money than what they make for the firm they work for. or that firms wouldn't employ women it they could get them cheaper than married or unmarried men. It's crazy to assume such premises. Full craziness. :D A reasonable argumentation would start from the assumption that firms pay salaries that reflect the value of the employee. The same way as we expect the price of bread to reflect it's w…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:09 PM
1

Oh, the the economic theory since Adam Smith got just refuted! Stop the press! :D These are the key concepts: demand, supply, and marginal cost. Let's discuss more when you understand these ideas and how they make everything cost what it's worth in a competitive market. No hard feelings but it's frustrating to discuss with people who don't have a clue of the science behind the economic theory.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:54 PM
2

The bottom line is that things (like bread or employees) in a competitive market cost what they are worth. I've seen people trying to refute this basic fact of economics but never successfully.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:46 PM
2

"I'd love to pay you 50% more because you have five kids and a pregnant wife. But Frank has a shop right next to us and he pays according to how much his employees make money for the company. We'd be out of business if I started paying according to the number of kids you guys have."
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:35 PM
1

Mata Hari could be a man.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:20 PM
3

Many women hate men because in their youth they fell in love with the same "alphas" as every other girl and then got disappointed because he (or they) couldn't go steady with all of them, just used them for sex. Because girls aren't told about their sexuality frankly they end up blaming men. That's why it's justifiable ... or so they think in their ignorance.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:10 PM
8

I'm old enough to know that he doesn't know what he's talking about. Men weren't, for heaven's sake, pigs in the 60s and 70s. They, or those who earned enough, were working their asses off to give women a chance to stay at home - and be happy, happier than women are nowadays. Appalling, feminist kind of, disrespect.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:55 PM
7

In the past, men were paid more than women because it was recognised that they might be supporting a wife and children. In a competitive market prices are determined by the market mechanism. There is no authority that can force companies pay people more than what their productivity is. But if they decide to be foolish and pay more, they'll be bankrupt soon because others aren't as foolish. Otherwise a very good article. The slowing down of the economic growth worldwide is taking place mostly bec…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 02:47 PM
3

Men are emperors and women slaves. And I'm pretty sure they really think so, the poor idiots.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 11:21 AM
10

It forces feminists to hold women to the same standard as men and give men the same rights as women. Why on earth would they start doing that now, after hundred or so years of doing exactly the opposite? :D
/r/MensRights31/07/17 11:17 AM
7

In FREE countries certain biological traits start to dominate - unless there is a strong narrative against them. If there is a narrative FOR a biological trait (like giving women privileges) it's very hard to believe it will ever end. But I believe that the counter-narrative is slowly spreading. And perhaps one day it'll become obvious even to the stupid that that giving women privileges and discriminating against men is destroying our culture.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:02 AM
1

I'm not Swedish but I think that "positive discrimination" is against the law, at least so it is in Finland if the state does it, and the laws tend to be very similar.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:41 AM
18

Giving women privileges is a biological thing and in free societies biological things are very hard to abolish. When you say you want less privileges for women most people think you're an evil person because saying so goes against their biology (evolutionary thinking patterns).
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:35 AM
13

"Enjoy your beauty, spend money on it, become even more beautiful, spend even more money, enjoy your sexuality, men want you, you're hot, but can become even hotter if you just just be even more narcissist." "You are better than men, you need men like a fish needs a bicycle. Learn to use them,."
/r/MensRights30/07/17 05:37 PM
1

Getting banned by aggressive sexists! A badge of honor?
/r/MensRights30/07/17 04:48 PM
8

Celebrating certain male virtues is a crucuial part of the western culture, no doubt about it. What stories do box office movies tell? Male heroes protecting the weaker. It seems that we absolutely love that story.
/r/MensRights30/07/17 07:28 AM
4

Thatcher, Merkel. And many others in Europe, South America, and Asia. For a female politician success comes if shecan somehow prove that she's above sexism. Many female politicians think that they can look down on men the same way they did when they were "normal women", carry on with that part of female culture..
/r/MensRights29/07/17 11:10 AM
1

If only Feminists used labels! "I'm a feminist, don't explain me anything if you're a man." And this is not a joke for people like me who are in the business of explaining.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 10:57 AM
3

Just stop talking to women! But that's not an option because you're supposed to chat with women if that's your job ... so? Don't get into jobs where you have to talk to women? Crazy, but is there an alternative in the long run?
/r/MensRights28/07/17 05:20 PM
8

Could somebody explain what this post is about? Who's doing what? Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:13 AM
2

Most people do care because if you want to convince somebody you must start with a common ground. Truth is secondary most of the time.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 06:40 PM
2

And then you took a rhetorics course on how to persuade people without offending them? :D
/r/MensRights27/07/17 06:27 PM
3

Perhaps that was what happened ... but then he went on. Can't tell. But we both know that there can be annoying knowitalls in class rooms.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 06:16 PM
2

Rhetoric considerations is a tradition that has been around since ancient Athens (at least, and probably since people started talking). If you are in a class that teaches, say, the history of ancient Greece, the teachers can correct you if you start talking about the history of the USA. Or perhaps he or she is just another stupid academic asshole, who knows ....
/r/MensRights27/07/17 04:25 PM
4

The school also said that it would revise its policies so that all students, “accuser and accused, including those like Paul who are found not responsible,” received “respect.” It's a paradox, I suppose, that the sex that allegedly has all those privileges that come with respect, has to regain the respect, or at least try to, by suing thee institutions and people who, well, think that men shouldn't be respected the same way as women.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:41 AM
7

Another "discrepancy" that feminist can't stand is that women are happier than men even in most poor countries. Then again, if you're not a feminist, it's easy to accept that because the women's quality of life is higher than that of men, it's pretty natural that women's life satisfaction is also higher. And, of course, almost nobody believes this - or if does, disagrees in public - because it's against the dominant narrative of oppressed women. Here are some links: http://www.gallup.com/service…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:33 AM
4

It was a "Composition and Rhetoric" class. In all likelihood it means, among other things. that you are supposed to learn how to discuss things politely, so that you take into account the context, like other participants and their views. Anyway, that's a very valuable thing to learn: how to disagree and talk about your views without insulting others. Hopefully the rest of the education is about real critical thinking and facts, not just rhetorics. And then to the downvotes ...
/r/MensRights27/07/17 09:07 AM
7

Women not having children and not having the option of becoming mothers and stay at home working part time or not at all is a blow for patriarchy and good for women? Hmm, I wonder if the feminists have really thought this through.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 08:12 AM
5

This is no way to conduct a survey. "The men and women who happened to hear about the survey and took the time to answer thought like this about certain aspects of men's lives and thoughts". Besides, is it sure that these people aren't feminists just trying to strengthen the misandristic narrative?
/r/MensRights27/07/17 08:01 AM
1

Yeah, it could be newsworthy enough to get to the headline if all had been women. That could have been unusual and newsworthy enough. But who knows. Perhaps the writer would still have thought that the point he/she wants to make is the dangers the illegal immigrants can end up in. You're on the right track - though I must say that journalism is not a career to strive for nowadays. So, understanding the elementary aspects of headline authoring doesn't get you far, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:36 PM
4

Haters gonna hate. I don't know exactly what the phrase means :) but it's obvious that there's always going to be be people who hate those they think they are allowed to hate. And there's always going to be people who take advantage of this strange mentality. Like Feminists. Hopefully most people are not haters, just stupid. Hmmm ....
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:26 PM
1

No I haven't. But I will. But the fact is that they got killed because they were in the truck, and they were in the truck because they were illegal immigrants (as far as I know, didn't really read the article all that carefully), not because they were men. That's my point. Nothing else.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 07:09 PM
1

So, nothing I said was logical, factual, or true? Better luck next time! Good bye and thank you for the fish :)
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:57 PM
1

If a dog bites a man its not news but if a man bites a dog ... That's what "newsworthy" means in the end. Of course you have a point. But that's just a different point I have been talking about. Let's agree that we disagree.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:49 PM
1

Why the hostility? Never mind. Not interested, really. The internet is full of you guys. That's why I almost never any more try to engage into´a discussion. Bye. And I mean it.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 06:21 PM
1

Yes, I understand that very well. But I believe that there are enough of truths to be dug out so that they are meaningful in this context, to have a rough estimate of the share of false accusations. And so have others.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 05:44 PM
1

Yeah, that's a big problem, one of them. One way to get around it is ask people who weren't directly involved but who investigated the alleged rapes or who discussed "deeply" later on with the alleged rapists or victims. Of course that's problematic , too. But in theory you could ask police men, prosecutors or therapists: "What is your honest opinion, did something illegal take place?" I seem to remember that such surveys have been made. Another way is to give the people an incentive to speak th…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 02:23 PM
0

Check out what "newsworthy" means. Then we can discuss more, if you still want to.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 02:02 PM
0

You, on the other hand, don't apparently know how news headlines are constructed: find the essence of the article (what in it is newsworthy) and tell it in as few words as possible. In this piece of news the essence (or part of it) was obviously the fact that the deceased were illegal immigrants. That they happened to be men, too, is from this viewpoint almost, though not altogether, irrelevant. It's silly that I get downvoted for something that is obviously true for a reporter doing his job - m…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 01:17 PM
4

A great video. In Finland there is this (female) head psychologist for a children's organization who said it something like this: Boys are expected to become manly but they aren't given the chance to practice it. Meaning that the society (and women for sure) expect them to become strong, independent, protective, aggressive if needed and so on but the same society forbids them from learning those virtues by asking and telling them to "behave" and avoid rough games. And sometimes even by giving th…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 12:58 PM
2

Nope, consult a survey textbook on how to find out out about things that people initially don't want or can't be honest about. It's not like this is the first time researchers stumble on this problem. There are several studies out there, and though the problems are significant there are several non-feminist estimates. And, yeah, an estimate with a large margin of error is the only thing you're ever gonna get.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 12:06 PM
1

Orange are the undecided. In the USA, for example, about 50% get circumcised and in Canada about 30%. In this sense the American way is to have no opinion, so to speak (and the Canadian way is to be against the mutilation but no so strongly as in Europe).
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:29 AM
8

Show her this map and ask which part of the world she feels her son belongs to, yellow or red.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:43 AM
2

I've read that girls don't mind that much, they can have a male teacher as a role model (perhaps because there are always also lots of female teachers to look up to, boys don't often have that luxury). Furthermore, female teachers tend to favor subconsciously (and sometimes consciously) girls. Male teachers do that, too, but less than females.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:25 AM
0

You can estimate the share with with pretty typical research methods: conduct a survey and then extrapolate from there. Of course there are particular problems with the survey but there are ways to overcome them, too, at least partly.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 03:17 AM
-5

That was an easy one: because the reason they died was that they were aliens, not men. Next.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 02:54 AM
3

LOL. As if an average joe over 50 had any value on the dating market!
/r/MensRights23/07/17 08:14 PM
10

Both men and women react mostly based on subconscious mechanisms, which again are based on hormone levels and brain structures. Logical reactions are "luxury", so to speak (said Tversky and Kahneman). But my hypothesis could be that men use that "luxury" (thinking analytically instead of emotionally) more than women because we are taught to do so over and over again since our childhood. And that's because men who can't "think slow", analytically but react emotionally can be very dangerous to oth…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 07:34 PM
6

A much more important social problem in education is the small share of male teachers. Why? It's been shown over and over again that boys do better if there are more male teachers and the education system is the most important tool the government/society has when trying to level the playing field AKA make the system more meritocratic. But in this gynocentric world of ours almost nothing is talked, let alone done, about that, while the STEM question is high on the political agenda. At the same ti…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 06:45 PM
4

Women [...] don’t have it quite as easy. That's right, women have it much easier, the accountability for women is smaller not bigger. If "Eleanor Kennedy" had driven off that bridge, in all likelihood, she would have gotten a pussy pass - even without starting a Kennedian PR machine telling that she is a young pretty white woman.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:59 AM
4

Comedy would be impossible if that was true. See Family Guy if you think that all other groups are protected. But, yeah, the safest group to make fun of is the white straight men.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:36 AM
1

The expert is a professor of religious studies. Why on earth! Isn't there hundreds of faculties and departments are intended to study issue like this that relate to gender stereotypes and stuff ... or could it be that those departments don't deal with issues they claim to deal with. /s
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:19 AM
2

women feel good when they're led to believe men are crap. I don't think so. Millions of years of sexual selection has made (stereotypical) men women's wet dream. But it has made men also bigger, more aggressive, more dominant, stronger. Women love that but it makes them feel weaker and submissive. It's that psychological relationship that makes many women love to mock men - and it seems to give them a subconscious permission to do so, too. But they definitely don't want to think that men are cra…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 06:13 AM
13

Two more reasons (in addition to those that got mentioned in the article) why there aren't studies on the subject: Academia is feminist (and those who aren't are afraid of feminists). The rape culture narrative needs to portray women as victims and men as monsters.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:45 PM
9

It seems to be a MRA book based on reading a few sentences here and there. Don't get fooled so easily, spend a few minutes to check the facts (and now waiting for the downvotes ....)
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:09 PM
4

You can read it, just click the "Read" link. Seems to be a MRA book or something, attacking somebody called Mermaid who seems to be a tumblr feminist hating men or something. I just read a few sentences here and there.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 05:06 PM
12

This is happening because feminists are so powerful (and because paying less salaries is an important goal for the administration). If, say, ugly people had as powerful an ideology and movement behind them they would be asking the good looking to cut their wages. Or ethnic groups, or short people, or, hell, crazy people. I'd hope that everybody understood that but almost nobody does. It almost always first about women and then perhaps about some other groups if they manage to be vocal enough and…
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:48 AM
5

Never give money to that firm. It's feminist and anti-male: women first, men second if at all.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 09:29 AM
3

I think I know what's the idea of motherhood, but what's the feeling of motherhood? Apparently it can be anything, for example demonizing your own children in public.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 08:44 AM
2

The classical era ended 1500 years ago.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:32 AM
4

all of the courses run for sexual offenders are only available to men. Doesn't that mean that all female sexual offenders walk free? If so, it doesn't sound like a loophole but something that was designed. I mean, how hard would have it been the first time when a female predator was in court to quickly set up counselling for her? But apparently they didn't, Certainly they didn't this time.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 07:03 AM
11

One important reason for the pretty catastrophic situation can be found at the bottom left hand side corner.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 06:42 PM
1

Furthermore the economy is in the end about customers and their wants and needs. And women spend much more than men. So, feminists seem to be saying that the (male) CEOs are using their power, not for the customers' benefit, but for the men just because they are men themselves. This is so ridiculous idea that it should be forbidden by the law. ;)
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:55 PM
1

Feminism is not based on poor logic and false "facts" but something that's beyond it, idiotism perhaps. The scary thing is that so many politicians and academics don't see it or pretend that they don't. Even companies are acting as if they were sane people. And that was a paradox from the feminist viewpoint though they can't understand it, being the idiots they are.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:43 PM
4

The feminists didn't make any ad hominem attacks and didn't try to shame him either which makes the strip a bit unrealistic. :)
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:37 AM
5

What are the lowest scores of men who get in compared to women?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 04:34 AM
1

Screenings favoring women, more money spent on research on women's illnesses. Plus I'm pretty sure women are treated better when seeking help, I mean, why wouldn't they be when they are treated better in all threatening situations?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 04:25 AM
5

Women have all the legal rights men have and a few more (that have to do with maternity). In addition women have many unofficial rights that the government grants them, like the right to get lighter sentences. I'm not sure men have any unofficial rights in that manner.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:59 PM
1

Progress, growth. What makes tomorrow better than yesterday.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 03:39 PM
1

And where will the growth come from?
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:50 PM
3

That sounds feminist but, surprisingly enough, it could be good for men too.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 12:14 PM
1

At the same time we see single women or lesbian couples getting more children. Polyamory is trying to get approved, and many medias, women's magazines, in particular, are supportive (and probably Muslims, too). The number of men might drop, too. Already people prefer girls strongly in adoptions. The same is probably true in cases where women get to choose the sex with medical help. Or by aborting male fetuses. The return of the nuclear family isn't probably how this will end - unless the return …
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:10 AM
1

Elites continue to back feminism 200%, which is really quite remarkable. They evidently think it's the ideal tool to disempower their eternal enemies: the male working class. Birth rates not up to par? Immigration and automation will solve the problem. There is a big "leftist" elite whose power originally stemmed from male workers. They are even more feminist. If I had to guess, the strong "feminist" logic we see in elites stems from biology and ignorance. Otherwise it's hard to explain why the …
/r/MensRights18/07/17 08:00 AM
5

As my wife said: women don't want to go to festivals without men there.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 05:43 PM
1

There was an actual study about the issue behind the link I posted. :) I should have clearly mentioned it. But of course innate traits don't explain but a par of the differences.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:53 PM
37

Young women are showing what the young men are (supposedly) missing because they drank too much? Young women show their power, sexual power in a situation where the men are too drunk to react?
/r/MensRights17/07/17 11:39 AM
7

I don't think MRA is an ideology - or at least it shouldn't be. Rather it's a movement against an ideology, and it uses the only weapon it has in this pro-feminist culture of ours: facts.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 07:43 AM
10

I was sympathetic toward feminism till I learned that they had been lying about the DV statistics for decades. By lying I mean telling that men beat their partners - and children - often and women don't almost at all unless they are "provoked". And that men control women - and children - with violence and the threat of violence. Those are, of course, lies, though a very successful ones. It's also typical hate-movement propaganda, comparable to what Nazis said about the Jews or the KKK about the …
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:15 AM
5

As a former scholar I know there is a tendency to not read studies that a are likely to have an agenda. For example, I wouldn't probably read anything these two feminists have written because it's probably biased. White men are often very conscious of their biases because they are taught to be ashamed of their sex and "race". Therefore they avoid agendas more often than other people. Of course this too is only a probability. But because time is a scarce resource you just have to make decisions b…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 05:55 AM
2

According to PISA about the biggest equality gap between the sexes in educational achievement is in Finland. At the same time the "satisfaction gap" is about the biggest in Finland, too. Strange ... And why would girls feel so much less satisfied overall whn women are more happy according to all surveys. Though i tend to trust the OECD no to be Feminist ... there is something fishy here.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:23 PM
7

There's another reason as well: in contact sports women would get massacred if they were put against the best and strongest male athletes.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:49 PM
1

Advertising is about differentiation and impact. Many fashion companies, particularly, are desperate for new ideas that get their name known and familiar. Yet, I'm not sure if this company and the firm they hires know what they are doing.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:25 AM
-2

Lol!
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:49 PM
-11

There is this thing called the etiquette and it says that women first and men then and old women before young. I can live with it the same way I can live with other rules of the etiquette, like, don't eat with your mouth full, use your own fork and so forth.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:27 AM
2

Sulkowicz claimed that Nungesser, her classmate, had raped her during her sophomore year in 2012 – but he was cleared after a university investigation. Really? I thought that the issue was that the university didn't clear him. And actually sided with the crazy woman.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:18 AM
5

This is what it looks like when you feed ignorant people's hatred and make them feel like they are morally superior when they are, in fact, moral maggots. 1930s? All over again?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 07:36 AM
9

Womenism (feminsim) is about women! Who could have guessed? The funny thing is that the life quality of women is clearly better than that of men (at least in the wealthy countries). And people tend to know this. And yet most people think that equality is about more benefits and privileges to women! How stupid can people be?!
/r/MensRights14/07/17 01:13 PM
1

But am I wrong when I think that feminists are feminazis? It seems to me that I know enough about the feminist mainstream that flirts with Nazi and KKK-like ideas. Yeah, I also know that there are a lot of well-meaning and even sane feminists but the big picture you get, when reading feminist texts and listening to their propaganda, is that they resemble racist movements, just replacing race with sex.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 06:54 AM
12

Men tend to be sexualized in two ways: as sexual objects because they look good and as "success objects" because they are up in the hierarchy, can dominate, can offer luxurious life to their wives and mistresses. Of course in the culture we live in that's never discussed.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:09 PM
0

Anyone who is a billionaire has mental problems and this keeps them from living in the reality that regular people live in. In what history book you found that silly idea?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:04 AM
9

Feminists tend to support the paternity leave for fathers because it weakens men's value on the job market and strengthens women's. That's why it has a good chance of becoming a law - as it has already become in many European countries. Force the fathers to take the leave and women will get employed more and get better salaries. (And this is a fact, so no need to downvote.)
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:51 AM
2

Feminism is so strong part of the power structure in Sweden that they aren't going anywhere. They will continue striving for more benefits and privileges for the better-off sex until, well, I see no mechanism that could stop it.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 10:20 AM
3

Later, in a written apology, Jackson said that what she said was "flippant, and I am sorry." “As a survivor of rape myself, I would never seek to diminish anyone’s experience," the apology said. "My words in the New York Times poorly characterized the conversations I’ve had with countless groups of advocates ... All sexual harassment and sexual assault must be taken seriously — which has always been my position and will always be the position of this Department.” The empire strikes back.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 06:40 AM
3

If they want to get federal money they have to play by the book.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 06:37 AM
-3

e) Lots of testosterone and no men to tell how to deal with it and turn it into a virtue.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 06:29 AM
3

But others say that the federal government’s reluctance to engage with the issue owes less to gender, and more to the stigma around drug use. “I think if it was any other group of people dying like this, we would have handled it a long time ago,” Others are wrong. Men and boys are dying in wars, in refugee camps, in dangerous jobs, in natural disasters all around the world more than women and girls and yet governments and organizations are mostly concerned with saving girls and women. Not helpin…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:27 AM
-2

Take a look for example here how it should look like. But seeing the response here I'm starting to doubt ... or are all the stupid men here? :)
/r/MensRights02/07/17 07:41 PM
-19

The graph is false and meaningless. The male curve is steeper because men have a higher IQ on average.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 05:06 PM
2

I've given up voting because there (usually) is nobody to vote for.
/r/MensRights02/07/17 10:45 AM
2

Probably too "unethical" so to speak.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 06:56 PM
2

When I was young and naive I thought what I was taught by the culture and institutions to think. Women are and have always been discriminated against and sometimes even oppressed by men, evil men. I was a friend of Feminism. But there was this nagging voice that seemed say that everything isn't the way it's supposed to be. I started studying MRA stuff, statistics, studies on equality, Feminism. Now it seems incredible how blind I used to be. It's so self-evident now that the narrative we are tau…
/r/MensRights01/07/17 05:51 PM
13

The report noted that women comprised 59 per cent of of the APS, at the last count, but just under 49 per cent of its executive level officers and only 43 of its elite Senior Executive Service. "Overall, the results indicate the need for caution when moving towards 'blind' recruitment processes in the Australian Public Service, as de-identification may frustrate efforts aimed at promoting diversity," he wrote. In fact blind recruitment would do exactly that, increase diversity, because the perce…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 12:40 PM
8

He's not alone, thou. I just read an article about a boy who already in the kindergarten denied to play with boys, dress in boy's clothes and so forth. The parents didn't like it - who would, because it'll mean all kinds of troubles and crises - but in the end they just gave in, at least for the time being. For girls, once again, it's much easier. We all know tomboys, who started off as "boys" but didn't change their sex when adult. Well, some do for sure, but a woman can live her whole life doi…
/r/MensRights30/06/17 08:54 AM
4

The story goes that the child is transgender and will probably be a girl before the puberty and won't produce sperm ever. So the mother is supposed to think that freezing her eggs could be a way for the child to have children that are at least partially related to her(him). They are supposed to do this kind of a thing when the child is female. I'm not sure where the sterilizing came into the picture because I just quickly glanced over the article.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 06:40 AM
3

And in reciprocal IPV it's women who in most cases start it. But who cares, the mainstream media, the government, and the politicians are going to carry on with the feminist narrative AKA lie.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:22 AM
2

It's a paradox, and feminists use huge amounts of tax payers' money to justify it by inventing lies about discrimination and oppression women are supposed to face.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:16 AM
5

People can interact with Flakes by asking questions or asking Flakes to demonstrate their "fighting abilities", which list out their strengths and compares them with each other. As if women weren't doing this kind of objectification already! I mean, as an art project, why not, but hopefully he or she realizes that women objectify men much more than the other way around. For example, men find about 80% of women attractive while women find 20% of men attractive (according to Tinder, if I remember …
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:13 AM
5

The silliest feminists don't even know that feminism is about lies and propaganda and not truths. For those idiots they should have a disclaimer: Please don't try to implement feminists "facts" and "theories" in the real world because they won't work. Just use them to demand more benefits and privileges for women.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:54 AM
12

There are people, like the Chinese and the Jews, who were discriminated against in the past in the USA but are now doing better than the white on average. That's because the system the white men and women created was a meritocracy and later on a democracy. Then there were people like many eastern Europeans and Italians, who were and still are discriminated against though they are white. Then there was this very strong, mostly white movement against slavery which pretty much abolished it in the 1…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:36 AM
1

You shouldn't be making generalizations like this of a group whose size is a billion or two.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 07:03 AM
9

Yeah, they really can't understand the concept because it's against all they have been told all their lives. But Facebook can because they don't want men to abandon their money machine. Men are less important than women in this respect but no so unimportant as the mainstream culture wants us to believe.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:39 AM
5

Never be nice to women in public unless they're family or very close friends? That sounds like the safest bet and I've been following the rule for ages. But it's just me.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:22 AM
3

I think that things have gotten better during the past 10 years. Aggressive lying has decreased and the number of people believing in feminism had gotten down. For example, lying about the DV figures and thus demonizing men was very common in the 1990s and 2000s. It seemed that everybody was buying the feminist lies: government, international and hundreds of local organizations, media, politicians, schools, universities ... Nowadays much fewer people or groups are saying publicly that DV is very…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:53 AM
2

Perhaps she will "abort" the baby soon. If not, she'll probably change his sex somehow.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 04:03 PM
3

Feminists do that all the time and they are doing pretty well in the corridors of power. But quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi, I suppose.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:56 PM
3

Isn't constantly eating too much a disorder?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:37 AM
2

People becoming genderless "in what we like" sounds like a bad joke. Or perhaps it's a Feminist dream. Anyway, women have very strong expectations for men. They expect a man to to "man up" if he shows "unmanly" or feminine behaviors. And those expectations aren't going away unless we can re-engineer women's genes.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:17 AM
2

And in higher education.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 05:08 AM
2

To trust a Feminist argument should make to the list of fallacies.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 06:01 PM
1

If we are apes then women look for dominance. Men - and male apes - who are dominant are confident or look that way, I suppose. Women also love men whom other women love. We, as apes, have a build in hierarchy "monitor". By the way, dominant "alpha" males have much higher stress hormone levels than other males (except for those who are on the lowest rung of the ladder and get bullied by everyone).
/r/MensRights26/06/17 12:55 PM
6

It's an coordinated attack against "patriarchy" and men. The ultimate goal is to have a world where woman are in the leading posts both in politics and business. That way toxic masculinity doesn't prevent women from creating a world of feminine virtues, like peace and love. That's what unites them. And that's what they are after, even if there was no conspiracy.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 07:01 PM
6

It took me 10 seconds to google it :) http://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/belinda-brown-a-century-of-feminism-has-failed-us-women-have-betrayed-mens-trust/
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:38 AM
-2

Never believe Feminists, lying is one of the cornerstones of their movement.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 03:23 AM
11

And Feminists think that you achieve equality by giving the better-off sex benefits and privileges. These two viewpoints are so far from each other that no wonder they can't get along.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:11 AM
2

And that's an survey that likely exaggerates the violence women face and minimizes the violence men face.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:46 AM
3

This study is from 2011, almost 6 years old. I've yet to see a feminist accept these statistics. That particular lie about men dominating women with violence is too important for Feminists. Another cornerstone lie is the wage gap. But the mother of all lies is to claim that women are worse off and discriminated against more than men.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:44 AM
3

It seems that they didn't really explain why the number off better earning men increased, though they speculated it had something to do with less yes-men or something. Here's another explanation: If you decrease the number of candidates those who remain are the ones who earn more, simply because they can spend more money on campaigning. Then again in Sweden people vote for parties and not individuals. The parties rank candidates who then get elected if they are high enough on the list. I don't k…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:11 PM
2

You have to be an experienced Feminist to see how the man is raping her by not keeping his legs tightly together (and concealing the weapon).
/r/MensRights19/06/17 12:08 PM
12

I had a similar, although not as tough, experience in a firm I worked for as a freelancer. First they hired a female boss, as yet another affirmative action, and then she hired a female employee who was supposed to do some of the work I had been doing, mainly PR and communication, also a lot of technical stuff. The problem was that neither of them had almost any experience of the jobs they were supposed to do. So, for a while they consulted me - and didn't still know what they were doing. And th…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 08:04 AM
1

“We have positive [female] role models in our leadership positions - for instance, Hannah Kentish was appointed as UK youth commissioner two years ago. And we also make sure what we offer is exciting and relevant and positive for girls.”
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:06 PM
9

Women's quality of life is on average much better than that of men (in the wealthy countries). It's not an accident or a law of nature. It's about gynocentric culture and politics (emphasizing feminine interests and feminine points of view). I've discussed with honest(!) Feminists who didn't deny that women's quality of life is better after I presented them with the evidence. But they couldn't back down when I argued that women also have more power than men. But it can be argued very convincingl…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 07:06 PM
64

Boys do worse because they mature slower till they're about 15 they don't have male role models to look up to and who'd mentor them in schools unlike girls teacher discriminate against them and give them lower grades. There are other reasons but those are probably the main ones. Our gynocentric societies have very hard time doing anything about these problems although they are extremely important. Sure somebody every now and then says that something must be done but nothing or not enough will ha…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 01:23 PM
5

Is there ever going to be a day, even in the next 25-50 years where men really do have equality in family courts, our suicide rates drop, unneeded male circumcision is thought of as equally abhorrent as FGM, and paternity fraud is completely stamped out? We are hardwired to care about women and children and see men more often as threats (women) and competitors (men). Men tend to experience an empathy gap when they have problems. When women have problems, on the other hand, people tend to feel em…
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:48 PM
23

The wince inducing "male" traits are as follows: winning, emotional control, risk-taking, violence, dominance, playboy, self-reliance, primacy of work, power over women, and disdain for homosexuals. Isn't that pretty much the same list you can find in "Red Pill books" discussing how to manipulate women to have sex. And if so, where are the origins of "toxic masculinity"? Is it, in fact, what women deep down want from a man? Is "toxic masculinity" men's willingness to satisfy women but just gone …
/r/MensRights16/06/17 04:04 PM
3

Feminists think that there are social constructs or forces that hinder women as individuals from reaching their full potential, like becoming interested in chess or becoming world-class in it. Those forces are called patriarchy and sometimes it hurts men, too. Feminists aren't totally wrong, just for the most part. If you consider the world around you critically, it's obvious that most things that prevent us from reaching our full potential are partly innate, there are probably more things that …
/r/MensRights16/06/17 07:52 AM
1

It's amazing how these "experts" keep finding out decade after decade that "women are as violent as men". Never mind that DV has been studied and the fact has been known since 1970s, at least. It tells about the huge power Feminists have. They can lie about something decade after decade and make people believe in their propaganda rather than academic studies. Hell, they make you so secure in your belief that these "expert researchers" don't even check out what previous studies have to say about …
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:30 AM
3

I don't think it's "true" in the sense that somebody would have made a proper study about it, but it's not na uncharted territory either. http://www.marketingcharts.com/traditional/women-in-mature-economies-control-household-spending-12931/ http://www.businessinsider.com/infographic-women-control-the-money-in-america-2012-2
/r/MensRights15/06/17 06:06 PM
3

At least in Europe women have gotten lighter sentences than men for ages. For example, torturing women has been mostly forbidden. Zoophilia was for a long time one of the gravest crimes there was - for an unknown reason - and it was almost solely men who were punished, often by death. Likewise, homosexuality seems to be a crime almost only when men do it. That was true in historical Europe (although not necessarily in ancient Athens). If I had to guess why, I'd say it has to do with roles. You a…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 05:11 PM
3

Women also spend much more than men and have more things. So, my guess is that children have to come up with more spectacular things for moms. Dads have far less personal things, so, you can buy him a tie or a bottle of whisky and that feels like spectacular enough.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:15 PM
15

This is something that repeats itself time after time in history. Does anybody know any good reason for this? The reasons discussed in the article seem inadequate and even false if you think that this is pretty universal and not something only Nazis do: Some scholars argue that the Nazi government did not persecute lesbians to the same degree because women in general were not seen as sexual beings or as threatening to the regime’s policy of pronatalism, which encouraged reproduction. Huneke, whi…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 07:50 AM
2

Many young Feminists support the ideology because they are young and just adopted the mainstream ideas and haven't seen much real life and thought through things. But dating one increases the risk of something unfair and sexist happening to you. The question is how do you tell the crazy and hostile Feminists from the more moderate ones. Over time you can, of course, but then something ugly might have happened already. A girl, who felt nice and reasonable, can all of a sudden decide, for example,…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 04:20 AM
3

A Feminist prosecutor: "We should always believe women who accuse men of rape. Yeah, she may not look attractive but rapes are not about sex. And anyway, we shouldn't put women in jail."
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:46 PM
2

And women don't say things that make men feel dehumanized? LOL!
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:25 PM
16

False accusations are often found out by the police before they get to the prosecutor.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:18 PM
3

Reading about crazy people's hysteria is painful. Why is the Guardian not bankrupt?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:10 PM
3

Your description makes me think about the male working-class culture particularly a few decades - and perhaps even centuries - ago. But in Europe, at least, the dominant culture is something else. Even if you can treat your co-workers - jokingly - in a very rude manner, you are supposed to be nice and civilized, a gentleman, in other situations. But this really doesn't explain why Feminism is so strong, while it explains other things.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 06:10 PM
5

Is Australia really an outlier? Why? It's against the narrative we tend to have about the easy-going and down-to-earth Australians.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:23 PM
6

Can you sell and buy films on YouTube in Australia?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 01:38 PM
6

Yeah, women in particular say that kind of things to men - or let their opinion be known with body language, like walking away and never coming back. :D Pretty much everybody, except for feminists, knows this. But then again that's not surprising, feminists know almost nothing about men and the interaction between the sexes. What they know are factoids from feminist publications like women's magazines and gender study books.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 08:56 AM
2

A psychologist was interviewed and asked why men seek help less often then women. He answered that it's about toxic masculinity. Men don't want to do things they consider feminine and, apparently, seeking help for psychological problems is seen as feminine. I would never ever consult a person with that kind of feminist bullshit ideas about men. That's one reason why men don't seek help as often as women. You think naively that you're gonna get help and be treated with compassion but instead you …
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:11 AM
1

Here's a screen capture of the latter post where they say that two thirds of the rape accusations don't lead to anything. Just showing that it doesn't help unless you can read what is said. And here's the poor Google translation: Helsinki Police Department July 22, 2014 · Inoculation rape is a crime Overcrowding with alcohol can go to anyone, but the use of humorous conditions is never acceptable. If another person appears to be too humane, first aid will come to the scene. If you find someone t…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 06:02 PM
1

I could, but you or something like 99% of people here couldn't read it. I tried - once again - Google translate but it's a mess. Finnish is not an Indo-European language and Google's algorithms just can't handle it. So? Anyone speaking Finnish could guarantee that what I wrote is true, but if the post is not public no Finns can read it and verify the authenticity. I can't see any solution.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 03:59 PM
2

It would give her an incentive and that would increase the likelihood of keeping the baby. "I don't have the money and my parents are telling me to give the baby up but, hey, it's going to cost the same never mind what I'll do. So why wouldn't I keep her and why wouldn't my parents allow me to keep her?" I'm pretty sure that the number of teen mothers would increase.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 01:31 PM
2

If she's, say, 13-16 and don't want to have an abortion, but but don't really have the resources to bring up the child or if her parents were pressuring her. she'll give the child up for adoption. But if she had to pay for a year or two, after she had given the baby away, she could as well keep the child herself. That's what mother usually want anyway. In other words, it would give her an incentive to keep the child even when she really didn't have the resources.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:31 PM
9

This is pretty typical and one of the reasons why single women tend to live in better areas then single men. If this kind of discrimination was directed against women fighting it would be high on the political agenda. Now it's just something you have accept as a man. Of course you could take some action but nothing would change.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 11:41 AM
1

The site seems to be typical feminist bullshit. The only correct way to use feminist "facts" is to think that they probably tell how things are not.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 09:12 AM
5

So, on a scale from 0 (extremely unfavorable) to 100 (extremely favorable) women (female college students) rated men at 75. But that was in 1994. Nowadays, if they repeated the survey, I wonder how much lower the figure would be. I'm sure feminism has been successful and the figure could be well below 50. Men rated men at 71. Probably that figure has gone down as well. Women rated women at 80 and men rated women at 77.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 07:13 AM
4

If they had to pay there would be more abortions and infanticides, more under-aged mothers and children living in shitty conditions. But, nevertheless, I like the question because it reveals a double standard.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 06:07 AM
3

Democracy and the welfare of women and children will go hand in hand to the end of times. Likewise, everybody fears the wrath of women so much that we'll rather give them what they want than ask about fairness. I'd wish I was wrong but I'm not. :D
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:56 AM
3

I listened to an interview of a PLAN employee. The mental gymnastics she performed were painful. First she explained how men are guilty of all the ills women and girls face in the third world. Those brown evil monsters! Then the interviewer asked about racism and all of a sudden those evil men all became victims whom the white people oppress. It's hard, impossible, if you have to be sexist (feminist) and racist AND a good person with RIGHT opinions. But then again, if you're stupid enough to be …
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:43 AM
1

it's silly to pretend breadlines are a result of communism. They most definitely were. I visited Tallinn several times in the 80s from Helsinki. Before the the Soviet take over these two cities were pretty similar but after a couple of decades of socialism in Tallinn you had empty stores and people queuing for bread while Helsinki and Finland had so much bread (crops) that it was actually a problem. If you don't let the markets decide what to produce and how much the inevitable end result is que…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 04:01 AM
24

I am Safr, ridesharing for white people. That wouldn't fly? But who cares, it's just men.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 07:08 PM
1

I'm sure that on average single men work less than those who have families and all the obligations there of. If you have a house and a loan you just have to work more compared to a single man's rented flat. And "a family man" has certainly a "higher", more demanding ethos than somebody who doesn't have to look after anybody else than himself. I think this is going to be a huge, even bigger issue than what it's now. "Where are all the good men who kept things going, made the economy flourish and …
/r/MensRights11/06/17 04:20 PM
1

Regulations can be poison to innovation AKA business and wealth. Deregulation, on the other hand, can bring about innovations that are poison to growth. To find the balance is the solution, not forbidding innovation or regulation.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:38 AM
2

You can't "do the numbers" because the numbers from the Socialist camp are all flawed. It was a system based on corruption and lies. You couldn't be part of the economic system if you were honest, if you, for example, told honestly how much your company had produced. Instead you had to tell that you were producing even more than your quota was. That way, as a "CEO" you could get the resources you needed to keep the business going - and your privileges in force.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:28 AM
2

Well, you can't know, because we have no reliable statistics on how much richer the west was and how much faster it grew. But they were poor, very poor. So poor that they even had to kill people who desperately wanted to emigrate. The capitalist or free market economy is an almost unbelievable lucky strike for us who can enjoy the wealth it has generated. But, yeah, it's possible that there is a systemic problems that are hard or impossible to make right. Perhaps Marx wasn't wron about everythin…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:16 AM
4

The USSR and its vassal states were appallingly poor in the 80s. I sold plastic bags as a tourists and a couple of them brought enough money to buy a meal. According to the official statistics they were richer than the west, though.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:49 AM
5

Economic growth has slowed down in most of the world since 2008. In the US, what you said is probably true to some extent.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:17 AM
7

Economic growth can be slow because of many reasons. I just pointed out three reasons that never get discussed. And instead of complex theoretical - and questionable - reasons, those are simple facts that in all likelihood have an effect on how industrious and entrepreneurial men are.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:06 AM
12

Historically all evidence, as far as I know, shows that societies take off economically when men, the more productive sex, are allowed to do business and work in a fair social environment. Now it's become fashionable to ignore this evidence and, instead, believe feminist dogmas. Now we are supposed to believe that it's women who will make the economy take off. That's crazy. In poor countries women's employment is essential because women who work won't make ten children. And that's the most impor…
/r/MensRights11/06/17 09:58 AM
2

In 1965 there were lots of families that didn't have washing machines or modern washing machines that automatically do "everything". That alone explains a great deal of the housework in the graph.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 09:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter