TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Icy-Start5536 Archive

View 6 posts and 499 comments by Icy-Start5536 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ok, this is a perfectly reasonable solution to the problem. I think it's the first one I read. I really appreciate it.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:37 PM
0

It's not about masculinity, that's a non sequitur, it's a mental thing. It's about logic like I asked in the title.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:24 PM
0

Which standards of masculinity did I bring up? Cause sure as shit I haven't posted any. Are you sure you read the post? Or is it just your prejudice?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:11 PM
1

You're making a fool of yourself
/r/MensRights27/12/22 05:03 PM
0

What if I claim that infiltrated feminists' posts are harming me? By your logic they should be banned.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 04:54 PM
3

Karma is a sex worker who identifies as a woman
/r/MensRights27/12/22 04:48 PM
0

You're guessing wrong. If you were a logical person you wouldn't be guessing
/r/MensRights27/12/22 01:13 PM
1

If you have abortion rights and the other gender doesn't, you have an unfair advantage of the other gender.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:51 PM
1

It shouldn't matter if you're logical
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:51 PM
1

Except there are feminist/feminised saboteurs and no progress is done
/r/MensRights27/12/22 09:51 AM
1

What do you think is illogical about it?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 08:19 AM
1

This shows you've got zero communication skills, that's how much you're worth
/r/MensRights27/12/22 07:28 AM
4

A human being whose reproductive organ is a vagina
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:02 AM
1

You are not welcome here
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:30 PM
1

👉🏻
/r/MensRights26/12/22 10:56 PM
1

Still here? Get the fuck out 👉🏻
/r/MensRights26/12/22 10:14 PM
1

Oh now you used the buzzword, guess it makes you smarter
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:47 PM
0

It's very hard and improbable to push through people's confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:37 PM
1

I'm talking about what can happen if you don't have mandatory paternity tests. Once you have them, non-biological father's should be exempt from being on the hook by law. As for the others paper abortion should always be on the table since women have real abortion on the table.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:36 PM
0

You're an example men should learn from. A beta guy knocks you up 5 times and you're still so ungrateful and want men to be responsible for someone else's kid. Thanks for helping more men getting out of this system
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:11 PM
1

Even your own husband gets a vasectomy that speaks a lot about how much you're worth 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:02 PM
1

Sure, they're smart enough to wear a condom WITH YOU. Never know you might knock up a sub-par woman.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:55 PM
0

No because men's and women's strategies are adversarial. Most men rainbow-f-word-ize themselves to have a shot at reproduction and they will be brainwashed or identify with the feminine. Until they get screwed hard by the system. It's better to have 1 million good ones than 2 million people who don't share a goal. Then once you win you can extend the benefits to them as well, but in the meantime you have a strong coalition.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:02 PM
-2

Because both are the enemy? Feminists shouldn't be welcome either.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:43 PM
0

No, not what I consider. Logic will be the metric, feminised men won't belong here.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:43 PM
-2

Yes, that's true. But aren't we stronger? We built civilizations, they didn't.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:42 PM
1

Send my best regards to your beta men
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:41 PM
-5

Yeah, in the meantime the other men will have their lives ruined by the feminine imperative
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:40 PM
0

You have a bulk of like-minded men pushing for the same instead of having divisive schools of thought. In that way you can focus all of your resources into the same action and campaign for whatever is beneficial to men, provided it's right in the first place. That's what differentiates us from the feminists. Divided groups are a surefire way not to achieve anything.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 07:16 PM
2

No but they can use the list of fallacies and terminate people for flaming.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:51 PM
1

I knew you were a woman, can't get blood from a turnip.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:46 PM
-6

Actually it's logic itself that does.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:45 PM
-4

I see many accounts here who are not helpful to the cause. I know there's the risk of becoming feminism 2.0, but what's the use of having beta/cucks/indoctrinated/feminised people? Our life spans are already limited and allowing these categories will yield no returns. Right now the options are: exploit the system and use game. PUAs, and the like try to change the system and use the law. MRAs abandon the game. MGTOWs I think we should heavily vet people's mettle, remove the scum and go for the go…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:08 PM
1

Do you think women should have the right to abort a pregnancy? Do you think two adult people don't have what it takes to decide what's best for a kid that a court should intervene?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 05:50 PM
1

There you go, no argument at all. Only emotional diarrhea, go troll somewhere else. I suggest 2Xchromosomes.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 05:43 PM
1

To propagate your DNA and not go extinct? I just pulled this out of my ass
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:31 PM
0

Wait a min, if she was married wasn't the husband legally presumed to be the father? How does it work in Texas?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:30 PM
3

He obviously did it on purpose to be held hostage /s
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:27 PM
19

Have you tried identifying as a woman?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:22 PM
129

Also in porn
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:21 PM
4

The biggest source of misunderstanding is that men communicate to exchange information. Women communicate to shame men into taking action and do the dirty work for them. Never debate with feminists. You can debate with women however, provided they show they're safe to debate beforehand.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:17 PM
4

Women always reduce themselves to sexual object for the right guy. Be the right guy. They always default to that, don't be surprised.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:12 PM
1

That's right, men should be given the possibility to go about reaching their reproductive optimum thoughtlessly like women do, and have the same safety nets women enjoy. In the situation you described there are 2 adults, your pointing the finger at just one is sexism. On top of that you're portraying men as unreliable buffoons who can't be trusted taking the pill, when the reality of things is 100% of the people who forgot to take the pill and that ended in a pregnancy were women. Society needs …
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:08 PM
1

Oh so now you're going and hominem against me so as to win? It's you the one who doesn't know what rape is since you didn't know the criterion that consent to sex isn't consent to having a baby. Obviously it's enforced only against men, but that's another cup of tea. Coming back to your (strawman) question: no, men should not be responsible for wearing a condom, you also have other contraceptive tools like spirals, female condoms and the pill, so if a woman decides to have unprotected sex and sh…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 12:32 PM
1

No it's the other person's responsibility not to trap (read rape) you. It's never the victim's fault. Or otherwise it's the rapee's fault for not "doing everything you can to protect your interests" and I'm quoting from you. So you didn't develop martial arts skill? Your fault. That's your logic, not mine.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 12:12 PM
1

Yeah sure it's the pill's fault, very effective gaslighting here. How's the man the victim? In the vast majority of the cases it's the woman you are in a relationship with who blatantly lies, she takes the pill for a period of time then she unilaterally decides to stop it and traps you. Then she's got the plausible deniability that "the pill isn't 100% effective". Bullshit. FYI consent to sex is NOT consent to having a baby. There have been many sentences condemning guys for poking holes into a …
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:34 AM
1

Yes. The same level a woman who chose NOT to become a black belt in Karate bears zero responsibility should she get raped. The victim is never responsible, but if you want to argue otherwise be my guest.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:05 AM
-2

Yes, exactly, but we could offer help. For example, I'm tired of having my social awareness always so high in settings like corpo world, leftists , I'm in poly (more to bang other women as a single guy than because I think it may work) and in these hotspots you're constantly vetted for even the smallest of political affiliations/jargon/inner beliefs and the like. There's always a sniper aiming at your head. The moment you say or even dress like or seem unfazed by the umpteenth shit test that's m…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 10:00 AM
1

Sorry to hear it mate, I must admit I really appreciate autistic people, especially in this era where everything is characterized by identities, you guys are outside of this spectrum and I really hope more men could help people with autism to develop meaningful connections
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:38 AM
1

This is the single most fallacious argument and, quite frankly, it's female logic 101. That men have internalised. It's not about the object (wearing a condom Vs rape) it's about the LOGIC. It's called a hyperbole, meaning you stretch someone's logic ad absurdum in order to prove him/her wrong. If it is wrong to accuse a person for someone else's actions (wearing a skirt gets you raped) then you are inconsistent if you think it's right to accuse a person for someone else's action if the context …
/r/MensRights26/12/22 04:37 AM
1

One wrong doesn't make a right either
/r/MensRights26/12/22 12:28 AM
1

Ok so since you believe that the interest of the child trumps the parents' you force them to stay in the same area. If one bails the other gets full custody.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 12:27 AM
1

She chose to wear a miniskirt, had she not done so she would not have been raped. /S + your logic She chose to walk into the park, had she not done so she would not have been raped. /S + your logic Oh this is good, it's comparable to NOT wearing a condom in fact she chose NOT to take karate lessons and become a black belt, had she done so she would not have been raped. /S + your logic You see how easy it is to play the hyperagent card? The truth of the matter is he had sex under the pretence she…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 12:25 AM
1

Yes, from a moral point of view it's spot on. But we're talking legal stuff here, OP posted the strawman argument of a feminist who was playing dumb to try and corner him, from a legal perspective she's not tricking you unless you have hard evidence. Don't underestimate how low lawyers can stoop to have it their way.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 12:21 AM
1

Well you wouldn't blame a women who got raped for wearing a miniskirt in a dark park at night, so why are you victim-blaming men now? There's no way to make this argument work unless you adopt a hypoagency/hyperagency approach on women and men respectively. The underlying message to this and many an argument of this kind is that men be women's keepers and undertake responsibility for their choices. In the actual society this is utterly sexist, but that's not what I want to point out, what I want…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 07:53 PM
2

The best argument from responsibility grifters is that a life was created so even though you were deceived you gotta man up and pay for child support. The big scam here is that in the modern era most men have only one "slot" and once it's filled they won't realistically have kids with another woman of their choosing since she won't accept him with his baggage. The trick here is that the child support will be determined by the courts and it's ALWAYS a percentage of your income and has very little…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:56 PM
1

Who says the women isn't lying? Stealthing is a thing.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:47 PM
1

So no child support. Shared custody and the child will get what his current carer can afford.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:45 PM
2

Meanwhile women can have sex and just abort the baby. Equality lol.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:42 PM
1

Weapons lol. I'm not suggesting it, I'm autistically answering a rhetorical question. Not gonna happen.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:40 PM
2

Yep but we haven't campaigned for a century to remove car killings from the list of crimes. They campaigned hard to remove 'fault' and, therefore, banging Chad every second day is tantamount to drinking a coffee legally speaking
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:37 PM
4

I understand what you're saying, but remember we're talking about legal stuff right now. There's a chasm between what the legal system considers 'right' and what people's morals are. In the position we find ourselves in women don't owe men shit. Just because she's your wife doesn't mean she owes you sex, nor does it mean she owes you faithfulness. So from their point of view they're still in the clear and they're simply "exploring their options!". On top of that she's not a slut capable of free …
/r/MensRights25/12/22 03:06 PM
7

This is the byproduct of two things: How society is stratified and herd Vs individual mentality. The first one is well described in The Gervais Principle, the latter in 1984 by Orwell. Sociopaths on top are after personal gain and since the zeitgeist is that women are discriminated against then it grants them no return to challenge this narrative, they will simply build rules (because they can) that will work for one or a very limited number of contingencies and won't work in the vast majority o…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 02:21 PM
7

What you would do isn't applicable to the population at large. We cannot afford to have a life-impacting decision to be made externally. What if the mother refuses and you're not the father? What if the court deems you the father even if you're not? It's like a homeless person relying on people's handouts. Its simply not sustainable. And even if you manage to pull that off the next man may not.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 12:35 PM
1

Sorry to say it bro'but you'd probably be raping them with all that PTSD going on, especially if you know you might die in the war. Selfish genes use us as vessels for them to live on, not much we can do. There are studies that prove that men prioritise sex when the risk of death is imminent.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 12:10 PM
7

But if in France you "steal" your(?) Kid's hair to take a DNA test you go to jail lmao
/r/MensRights25/12/22 12:03 PM
2

Just reply "you're femunderstanding" or "femlistening" Stoop down to their level, make it about them when they make it about you, not the idea. It's illogical, fallacious, sub-par Yadda Yadda Yadda but that's how they win.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 12:00 PM
7

Testosterone gives you confidence, and to help others you have to be confident you might make it. Masculinity can be positive
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:59 AM
5

Hey said 9/10, there's the other 1/10 to take into account.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:58 AM
42

Most falsely accused men would pay 500 € not to go to jail. It's not enough
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:32 AM
9

You see that window over there?
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:21 AM
39

That's a technicality since in order for fraud to be there you need the psychological element (intent) being a jizz jar is not enough, you need to be one AND willfully trick the man into believing he's the father. The burden of proof is on you though. Remember they're already thinking two moves ahead (and poisoning the well) so since people's awareness of paternity fraud is skyrocketing they need a safety net, so what do they do? They throw the intent argument at us knowing too damn well that's …
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:15 AM
13

A right to ask for the test does NOT equal the certainty of getting it. Speaking of sufferings, what's your take on men raising someone else's biological child with the State mandating they be responsible for it even when there's the certainty the baby is not theirs? Apparently you're against impositions so I'd like to hear your solution
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:03 AM
7

Women cannot be trusted to vote in a pro-social way. They will always fight for the sisterhood over society, with a few exceptions - which don't matter cause in a democracy you need the bulk of votes, not the outliers. Therefore, arguing with them is not the solution.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 10:58 AM
1

No they're not potential options. Self-eroticism lacks human connection, that's why you see "love motels" in Japan where men seek cuddles and conversation and it's way more expensive than a brothel. Obviously that's fake, too. Same sex? If you're into it be my guest but turning gay as a surrogate for women is just laughable, in any era of the history of mankind you'd be bullied even by the soyest of man for bringing that up. Dogs? Same rationale, first of all there are people who don't like anim…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 10:55 AM
8

Because it's their game. They also win by sheer herd mentality and sexual blackmail.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:48 PM
1

Not feasible because Briffault's law.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:42 PM
3

Women's game has Always been pitting men against other men. Most men will shame you back into the plantation and, if there are not so strong legal boundaries, they will also use physical confrontation to bash you back into submission. Your game is to game men and unattractive/old women into thinking you're "innocuous" from a hypergamous standpoint (you're a good provider, you don't criticise, you genuinely care etc) while simultaneously gaming hot women. Remember there wouldn't be a need for gam…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:30 PM
-8

So the hitman's fine?
/r/MensRights20/12/22 12:31 PM
-9

TL;Dr: OP broke the following laws of power: 3,4,5,9,12,13,14,20,22 and 38. If you need(ed) this job (next time) abide by these. If not stand up for yourself and get kicked but with your head up high and learn from it.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 12:30 PM
1

Either you're Guybrush Threepwood or you'll die a slow and painful death
/r/MensRights20/12/22 12:23 PM
7

Bring them back!
/r/MensRights19/12/22 07:46 PM
54

Women most affected 🥱
/r/MensRights19/12/22 07:14 AM
21

Does it mean women can't? Please elaborate the popcorn is almost ready
/r/MensRights19/12/22 07:12 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 01:39 AM
1

Who the fuck cares?
/r/MensRights16/12/22 07:11 PM
4

He should relocate to another country and dox them
/r/MensRights16/12/22 07:08 PM
2

Whenever people reason in binary extremes, and women in the aggregate do, 'benevolent' sexism is malevolent towards men. Sure there are women here who reason using non-zero-sum games and Paretian betterments but the probability of finding one is like having 30 straight sunny days in London lol
/r/MensRights13/12/22 11:25 AM
3

Nor should it be income based. There should be charts that are valid for everyone, percentages are needed to keep the number of children a person can have down. AND each single expense should be traced and if one parent spends the money not for the child that should be seen as fraud.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:17 AM
8

This. The red pill proposes the 'hierarchy of love' theory. If we toss the name aside for a moment and acknowledge that red-pill creators have great ideas but a knack for hate-attracting slogans, we'll see that the theory is pretty sound, that's how nature intended. Men protect women, women protect the offspring. Makes sense. And kids obviously love pets/puppies all of that. Now, if we look at crimes that very 'hierarchy' is reversed, so it is descriptive of that phenomenon both ways. Yes, there…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 08:14 AM
0

What happened to telling the truth without full disclosure? Had you kept that info to yourself you would have gotten laid. AFTER that you could say "oh well you know, I'm an MRA" and if she leaves ask her how it feels to be pumped by one lol
/r/MensRights13/12/22 07:52 AM
2

Yep, overall that's what happens. EVERY girlfriend I have makes more mess and I certainly don't expect them to clean. It's ok, I can still hire a cleaner, I prefer them putting out. I really don't see why I'm getting downvoted. If I'll ever go cohabitating I'll done cook dinner and do the dishes and she can cook lunch and do the dishes. Things like that, but overall men should do traditionally masculine chores and women traditionally female chores. If you take the 'equality' bait her sex spigot …
/r/MensRights13/12/22 07:50 AM
3

Yes .
/r/MensRights12/12/22 09:12 PM
3

Yep, it's the left's way of doing it
/r/MensRights12/12/22 08:58 PM
-1

She doesn't mind and we'll go upstairs to fuck anyways
/r/MensRights12/12/22 08:53 PM
-6

All my girlfriends complain that my house is dirty, then make some supposedly witty jokes and put out as usual 🙄
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:15 PM
-2

All my girlfriends complain that my house is dirty, then make some supposedly witty joke and put out as usual 🙄
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:15 PM
-5

All my girlfriends complain that my house is dirty, then make some supposedly witty joke and put out as usual 🙄
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:15 PM
8

Think again. Their victims are pretty diverse: white men, black men, Christian men, Muslim men, straight men, gay men etc etc
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:45 AM
-3

Everyone has their own weapons. It's more subtle to kill people by proxy by letting them off themselves after you get them cancelled. Chapeau.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:43 AM
1

Just ask them "have you ever had a real man?" If they say no then "then you're not capable of getting a real man to yourself, how would you know?", If they say yes "then you weren't capable of keeping a good man, how would you know?"
/r/MensRights11/12/22 02:29 PM
1

Omg that's sexist
/r/MensRights11/12/22 11:50 AM
1

The worst thing is that these supposedly white knights always resort to sneakiness and bend society to their needs, at least back in the day they used to play the tough guys and confront you.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 11:46 AM
2

How old is a sixth former? We don't have the same system
/r/MensRights22/11/22 07:44 AM
1

That's a step forward
/r/MensRights22/11/22 07:43 AM
36

Why not? They're perfect! Now one of them is driving me back home, we met as usual at 10 PM had sex, played PlayStation together and bought dinner for me, oh and if I'm banging another one I just tell her and we st up for a different day. You can date single mothers, just don't be her ex husband.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 07:34 AM
9

Unless you consider murder by proxy. They strip you of everything you cared about and then you off yourself. Sneaky.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 07:00 AM
13

That's why you buy a house before you enter a long term relationship, then rent it out (preferable to your own company) and go rent somewhere else
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:59 AM
17

I have a solution for that: never go out shopping for anything so that your wife doesn't kill the kids, but you all starve due to lack of food lmao
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:39 AM
2

Of course. They don't have any interest to. When a woman cries "all men are like that" just imagine a kid blaming the computer AI for not beating a video game.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:33 AM
1

Because it removes layers of control for hypergamy. They're shitscared of being fucked (reproduce) by a sub-par men, therefore, every technique that makes you improve in the sexual market place is rape-y to a (handicapped) female brain.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 03:27 PM
0

And that's a big problem, since it can be corrupted. I see people are very prone to thinking that private justice is bad, but public one can be just as bad once it gets infiltrated and corrupted. If the State wants to have the monopoly of something, then it needs to give the people the CERTAINTY that that something will work. Not at the 98% of efficacy, not at the 99%, not at the 99.9%. At 100%. Anything different from 100% justice is tantamount to saying that someone, somewhere is gonna be a vi…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 03:37 PM
1

Given the level of insanity it reached, justic shouldn't be public.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 09:06 AM
1

That's the correct approach game-wise, but it's a cope, we are trained to desensitise ourselves more out of necessity than virtue. That's the same problem with stoicism, it will make you better at accepting (rationalising) losses but it won't make you better at getting what you want (success). The biological truth is that we the human beings are social animals, being totally acknowledged is part of our nature and when the opposite happens it leaves a scar irrespective of how many other successes…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 08:22 AM
1

I believe men should pay for the first date. But I also believe the first date should be planned after 3-4 times she comes over and puts out. Don't simp gentlemen, just don't.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:10 PM
1

Hmm because hypergamy?
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:09 PM
3

I think that women's behaviour is now in the open. The next step in NOT removing women's freedoms, it's removing men's responsibilities.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:01 PM
3

In Scandinavia they're better off than workers, they've got PlayStation and a hotel-like room in Denmark
/r/MensRights17/11/22 12:16 PM
10

If you're serious about the prevention part, then we should remove them from the genetic pool via death penalty. Now that it's proven that psychopathy is genetic we are confronted with a dilemma because hey we don't wanna be Hitler right? But at some point we will have to make a decision to either seriously limiting the potential for new psychos to be bred OR telling ourselves that we're good for not endorsing death penalty or large-scale culling of psychos (who may or may not commit these atroc…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 09:01 AM
1

It shouldn't be fine to break a tie either. The should find another pertinent criterion to choose from
/r/MensRights17/11/22 08:03 AM
1

The best weapons against ghosting are pump-and-dump, MGTOW, attentions withdrawal, inaction when they are in danger and so on. The élites set up a far between the sexes, they then destroyed the old social contract by favouring women, they out us in a lose-win situation, they also know the most natural and best way of dealing with a lose-win is a lose-lose and so the family unit dies. They also know we can't collude since women can't get rid of hypergamy. It is emotional abuse, it is behavioural …
/r/MensRights16/11/22 10:51 AM
1

I second this. Ghosting IS emotional abuse, with or without relationship. There's not a single culture on Earth which didn't develop social norms to regulate our lives. Ghosting someone is sheer emotional abuse. Say something like an excuse but say it, if you are "empowered" or "strong and independent"(TM) then you're expected to have the balls to politely dump someone. That's the behavioural equivalent of racism. All this exaggerated individualism bullshit is simply against our animal social na…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 10:44 AM
1

Problem solved: Both parents will work from home and raise the child equally.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 08:16 AM
11

3 years on nofap
/r/MensRights14/11/22 12:25 PM
3

How do you prove that though? Do you need to keep track of it with pics somehow?
/r/MensRights13/11/22 01:04 PM
3

Don't the kids have a father? The problem is easily solvable. The father gets the kids, she gets the jail.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 08:19 AM
8

No, I don't.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 04:28 PM
13

Exactly, it's between consenting adults. Remember we're talking abstractly, not this current situation. But you implied it's wrong for a man to start such a situationship but you did NOT imply it's wrong for the woman, which I don't think it is. But your point out only that it's the man being inappropriate (another PC beta word) demonstrates your bias.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 04:14 PM
11

SJWs always double down. You don't say
/r/MensRights06/11/22 03:29 PM
20

Because they're more beautiful than their 30-year old counterparts. But the fact that you question why a 25-30 years old man would want a girl who's 18 but do NOT question why an 18 y.o. would be with a 25-30 man is very telling of your bias.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 03:27 PM
17

It's not inappropriate. And apart from any sexual nature of the text, at 18 she would be an adult anyway.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 10:45 AM
1

The feminists have been great at their game. They simply infiltrate any space, however small, it can be social media, the school, the church you name it. And then corrupt it from the inside out
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:38 AM
1

As much as we can swipe after sex while she's sleeping on our chest. Been there, done then and she knew, too. Awesome.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 09:33 PM
8

Out of all the times women forced themselves onto me being on top was the ONLY position they ever used. That's insane. Then one time I was 15, therefore unable to consent in the country I was in, and she was 18 that's a separate one. But any time I didn't want they would get on top or grope after many no's. Men should seriously consider withdrawing from society
/r/MensRights04/11/22 07:41 AM
8

Fake middle ground fallacy. 1) Things are fucked BECAUSE the female imperative gained too much power at the expense of the male one. 2) Women are incapable of overriding hypergamy, as much as men are incapable of overriding polygamy. The difference being that men who can afford that are a minority, whereas all women are hypergamous. That translates to women voting for women-friendly politics, alphas voting for men-frindly politics and beta men being stuck in the middle. If beta men win some grou…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:42 PM
1

He's actually lucky. Well done Chad!
/r/MensRights31/10/22 06:56 PM
1

This is the dumbest thing I've read in a while
/r/TheRedPill31/10/22 05:07 PM
2

Because in their (twisted) idea they can jizz more easily if they side with women. Spoilers alert: it's right the opposite
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:37 PM
4

Universal income won't keep hypergamy at bay. Also you can't (easily) make laws that constrain people to spend what they earn, they can always choose to offer/provide for another one. Unless you make 1:1 restaurants where each one is required to pay for himself lol. As a result of it feminists will keep on trolling screaming "wage gape" when in reality women spend 90% of the money and the public expenditures benefit women more than they do men.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:36 PM
2

Which is a losing proposition in and of itself. If you want to get 10 aim for 100 or you'll get 1
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:56 PM
7

Ok so what's your solution to make wars more equitable, the spending gap more equitable, sexual selection more equitable?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:54 PM
10

Another example that hyperboles don't work on women/women are verbally violent by pretending not to understand simple things. The mods should ban them and make this space better.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:32 PM
1

It's not men not believe you. It's you not bringing enough a conclusive evidence. Women don't believe men either, nor do men. And they shouldn't. Nobody should be believed just because. If you can nail one guy down then he should be punished harshly but if you bring something that could have been written by anyone then it's another thing.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:22 PM
1

Oh it's like that. I thought there was some name and last name, that could have been written by a woman as well, can be a false flag.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:53 PM
2

So upload them and send the link
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:32 PM
-1

The number of upvotes/downvotes shows were the truth lies.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 11:17 AM
0

No but I'm not gonna feed you, troll. I came up with a lot of rationale and solid points. You contributed nothing. Those appeals to emotion and overall sophistry might help you win some debate with lesser men - the only ones you can attract with your character - but in here it's not gonna get you very far.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:57 AM
3

Because women have altered the rules to the point they hurt men by exposing them to the worst things their biology considers to be. Like cuckoldry, alimony rape, parental alienation, false accusations, zeroing men out etc. In the past many philosophers have debated about how to measure the validity of an idea and the best way found was to let it circulate freely and let people's morals react to it. Well, men's morals are very clear. Feminism is smothering masculinity and making most men go extin…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:40 AM
4

Screenshot/audio record or it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:09 AM
20

Yeah they're "intimidated" by it
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:07 AM
1

Butthurt that you resort to copying my lines?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 10:06 AM
1

Women don't value honesty, openness, virtue etc. All those things are welcome but only as a by-product of STRENGTH. You've got Socrates's qualities? All the better! As long as you're strong! You've got Socrates's qualities but you're scrawny and shit scared? They're of no value to women. You can't separate the two and hope to win. If we all turn ourselves into Gigachad philosophers women will follow and help rebuild, if we turn ourselves into soy philosophers women will despise us and make the c…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 08:01 AM
2

What did he do? I'm not aware of it but sounds good :)
/r/MensRights28/10/22 10:15 PM
5

It's really the Nash equilibrium. I advise you read that in the 'theory of games' it's spot on. It's like during cold war, in the absence of collusion both powers tend to escalate until the mutual destruction is an option. But as long as women use no logic but simply outcry men and win, there will be no real consequences for them, and they will continue. It's not about 'stooping' so low, it's about winning. Every man should prioritise winning over wearing a paper badge of honour. It's way better…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 09:13 PM
4

Verbally bullying adversarial ideas is the way of feminism. If you don't reciprocate you'll never win. They didn't win by being "good people", they just use mob justice and brigading and silencing and all these methods. I'm not asking you to like it or to become despicable, but if you fight with confetti and your enemy has nukes, you simply lose. That's it.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 08:17 PM
2

The problem is you won't convince all men to do it. Actually most betas will find it advantageous to exploit that. That's why thinks like communism don't work. Because men are pitted one against the other by biology. And even if some collude, most won't.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 08:14 PM
4

So is sending people to jail for crimethink
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:19 PM
5

Oh yes, the "who hurt you" fallacy 🥱 Again, if you're below average in intelligence let me repeat myself. This is NOT a comparison, it's a hyperbole. Learn the difference. But I understand that's your game to strawman because you don't have a valid point. Now please go educate yourself and then you can resume talking with me 👉🏻
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:18 PM
1

We need some pioneer to start reporting women for rape whenever they lie about being on the pill. And see what happens. By all accounts according to the current definition that's rape.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:06 PM
1

So if someone wrote an article about how to murder a woman with the disclaimer that it's just for educational purposes and it's bad, that would be acceptable?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:03 PM
4

Because you have to say this disclaimer but by and large this is true. Not all cobras are dangerous but you'd better treat them as if they are when you're next to one.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:54 PM
6

Besides that, that's what happens when women take social decisions and enact laws. That's real harm, not potential, not imaginary, REAL.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:49 PM
14

The problem with you fucking subintelligent people is that you don't understand hyperboles. The hyperbole is meant to compare the LOGIC behind an argument by exaggerating it ad absurdum. Your strawman is to compare the OBJECT, when it is clear to people of average intelligence that that's inaccurate. Now learn, internalise the concept and stop misreasoning so that next time you'll look like a decent human being.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:47 PM
2

Nor do they make children. But sexbots + artificial wombs= jack-fucking-pot
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:46 PM
2

No, they won't. Nice dreams though
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:43 PM
2

No, that's why I don't consider extrapolitical methods bad. Not necessarily violence but rathe withdrawal. Any change that surpasses our life span isn't evolutionarily worth it
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:42 PM
5

No, it's not. Men spend copious amounts of time trying to understand women. Women don't. It's lack of effort. Stop giving them easy alibis
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:23 PM
1

If you want to make easy money just open a restaurant where each person is required to pay for himself using a different card per transaction. All men would go there on a date
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:42 PM
3

And even if you do ask them out for a walk, she can still pull you into a restaurant and expect you to pay. By that logic it should be her
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:39 PM
10

Oh the fallacy of individuation. I'm sure theres THAT one feminist who isn't full of double standards. She's also blond, virgin, wear gowns and bakes cookies oh and she's waiting for you.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:52 AM
3

Racism = Classism + Sexual Competition/Anxiety. End of story. In the aggregate women don't concern themselves with abstractions or other not so pragmatic, disempowering things like morals, principles, fairness, loyalty etc. IT'S THEIR GAME, DONT FALL FOR IT! The same woman who shames you for going to Eastern Europe would gladly go to Jamaica or Kenya. They will always, always, ALWAYS say what is most convenient for them to maximise their reproductive success while simultaneously keeping the comp…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 08:08 AM
1

I will never have my son go through this. I've hardly ever felt orgasms in my life. Out of the 500+ women I had only 4 made me feels something, but it's not their fault, I just happen not to have skin and nerves. Virgins? Do matter but it's not that strong orgasm most of my mates feel, we have been condemned by coward people who would never have done it now face to face one-on-one
/r/MensRights26/10/22 10:36 PM
-1

What do you do? You convince him to drop this kid and then you have a biological kid with him, that's what you do. Please don't complicate this guy's life any further, give him what was taken away from him and be happy with him.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 10:08 PM
4

His aunt is his enemy. Rollo Tomassi is right saying that the sisterhood supersedes everything, she's so shitty a human being that would rather see blood of her blood go extinct (and be raped by the system) rather than having a woman - who's worth is self-evident - being left with the consequences of her choice. We should learn that our relatives, too, are politicised. Often to our detriment.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 10:04 PM
1

No, they would be wrong because if a woman respects you and sees you as an example to follow, she'll follow and won't be looking for attention elsewhere. Your empty bluepill rhetoric is harmful but if you're convinced it's gonna pay off, be my guest and try it out. See you here when you'll be crying and make a post about western women being too flaky and promiscuous.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 07:18 PM
-2

No buddy you got it backwards. Do NOT buy into that boundaries crap. The only time you should utter the word "boundaries" is to game a feminist in order to get laid or look good around other people. Demonostrate. Do NOT explicate. Nor should you pre-emptively communicate boundaries because that would be an ultimatum and ultimata don't work. Just give her enough rope, and the. Lean back and watch what she does. If she naturally submits to you and wants to be your partner she'll pull the rope alon…
/r/MensRights25/10/22 06:11 PM
3

So what? When women are migrants they tend to falsely accuse of rape, commit frauds and exploit prostitution.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 07:49 AM
7

Not only that, also Ukrainian women. But when mass male migration from Africa took place nobody could say a thing lest he be labelled a racist. Mass migrations are treated differently according to the migrants' gender.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 08:59 PM
2

"A wonderful young woman" Hmm hard to believe since she drove her bf to committing suicide but I feel magnanimous today let me look at her pics... Oh... Fake news!
/r/MensRights23/10/22 03:09 PM
2

Do you have a reason why women belonging to the same class get significantly less time if any and get convicted at a significantly lower rate? Classism would erase the sentencing gap, all all things equal what stays? Pussy? Here's your answer.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 07:08 PM
2

And where does classism stem from if not from the beta-bucks side of hypergamy?
/r/MensRights22/10/22 04:58 PM
1

Wait was it me? Oh wait I'm not fat
/r/TheRedPill22/10/22 09:53 AM
2

The problem with this is when you find a significantly better partner like a hot virgin. OP's point still stands, but abundance won't solve it all. I've got 6 plates, being a swingers with one of them and I'm also in the poly community fucking other dude's wives in the clear. It's not abundance that makes me not GAF, it's that I DGFA for real. But the moment you get hands on, or presume you've got a shot at a high value woman that might be an incentive to leave it all behind. It would be a mista…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/22 08:49 AM
8

In my experience throughout school, university and the work place women are rated significantly higher for the SAME output and men significantly lower than they deserve.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 08:44 AM
2

It's about time to tell the truth about the concept of jailing people. We jail men more than we do women because of intragender competition. Even if we exclude all biases, which are true, there is no guarantee that a judge isn't sending innocent men to jail so that there would be more women available. Perhaps he's not even aware he's doing so but men evolved to rat each other out for personal gain, and of that happens to be unjust then who cares it's not me the one who's going to serve time. The…
/r/MensRights22/10/22 08:31 AM
5

Still she did the honourable thing. I would be distraught but proud my wife did that. I see no point in this post.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 08:24 AM
11

Men don't form coalitions. Women do. So if you are in a game called "democracy" which is nothing but a numbers game, one group will always dictate their conditions on the other. What you're describing here is beta men trying to be sympathetic to the feminine imperative so as to have a shot at reproduction and in doing so they condemn all men to what is to us the worst thing that can happen in life. We need to end this BS, just because more people agree doesn't mean it's right.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 05:49 AM
12

Good luck endorsing the child's interest - say - in the case of rape. Why am I bringing up rape? Well because that's usually a man's strategy unlawfully taking over a woman's. And cuckoldry? It's a woman's taking over a man's. They should both be harshly punished, but only one is.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 11:05 PM
12

Not to mention that the media take a woman's word to write an article about it. We have no proof it really happened.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:30 AM
3

If that's the case she cares more about her feelings and how he makes her feel than him. He dodged a bullet.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:22 PM
1

Wow I don't want to be one of those guys whose ex wives I'm banging. In ALL - and I mean ALL cases women portray their ex's as abusers or lazy buffoons. I don't buy that. All I see is respectable men who want to keep the bond with their kids alive. Of course I don't contradict the women out of cowardice/opportunism/game but the ones who talk shit about their ex's are the ones men should consider to pump and dump (TM)
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:36 PM
1

Wow a Don Demarco horn sounded off in my head :) The thing is kids... I'm banging countless single mothers and they're all the same: they left they're husbands because they were unhaaaapy, the husband moved out and he's got supervised visits every second weekend. I guess there's no avoiding that the kids will be almost exclusively with the mother, right? :(
/r/MensRights19/10/22 09:50 AM
1

How can you keep everything separated in Poland and prevent her from raping you? I've acquired all my assets before marriage (not like I'm considering it anyway but might be blackmailed in the future since I want a kid) no mortgage, nothing. Everything is on my name. I'm planning to go to rent somewhere if I get married but I don't like the idea.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 09:36 PM
1

I love in Poland bit don't speak Polish, sorry mate. How is it called? I'll look into it.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 07:41 PM
1

How does it work in the Netherlands?
/r/MensRights18/10/22 07:37 PM
1

No worries men will pay for both lol
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:06 PM
11

Omg are you comparing women to children???!!! Reeeeeeeeee They collude to get a person fired for not giving them cookies.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 07:34 AM
1

Thanks that was actually my main choice. The problem with women in the workplace is that even when you do absolutely nothing they still can target you for whatever petty reason you don't even know. Narcissists have a tendency to see everyone else as a narcissist and before you know it you're out.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/22 09:40 PM
-10

Ok, if you can't give advice please leave the conversation and let people who can talk
/r/TheRedPill12/10/22 09:29 PM
6

Let's not use female logic. If it's in the West and the UK is in the west then it's in the UK. Why does it matter? Because it's a Machiavellian fallacy, if someone elaborates like this - which is good- it will be perceived as dismissive. We should twist female logic against feminists not use it among ourselves.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 08:44 AM
2

You're nitpicking trying to make me say 'nothing' 🥱 the thing is I 'saw this coming' many years ago since it is a luxury belief, to me this is just a confirmation of the obvious: in times of trouble we can't afford playing with those things anymore and biology kicks in for we need to preserve the species (stupid mistake for the ones who actually die - but they will be forced to, not their fault) so a society NEEDS to see transexual 'women' as men since you need cannon fodder to send to the front…
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:10 PM
2

Why not Michonne? She's a woman I admire
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:58 PM
3

Easy, make a certification where the standards are so fucking high: physical, mental, conscientiousness-based, punish neurotic behaviour, praise loyalty and creativeness then only hire people with said certification. You'll skim off most women and the ones who are there are they ones men naturally accept. At that point the average man will have a safe haven to be in. Relocate to another country like the UAE and then expand this network worldwide. Build a people like the Jews but let it be based …
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:53 PM
9

Women aren't owed protection.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:50 PM
8

TL;dr WGTOW are socially acceptable, yet feminists say feminism doesn't advocate for double standards.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:48 PM
0

Lol that trannies would go fight, regardless of whether it's a new thing or not. The left itself sees transexuals as males. This is the smoking gun. Yeah, then there is a less frequent case where biological females transition to men and yet they are seen as women by the PC left once more. Lmao
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:45 PM
1

Is there an age cap to being a sperm donor? In Europe it's a thing
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:43 PM
1

Which requirements do non American citizens need to have in order to have a surrogate mother? Apart from money if course, I'm talking legal requirements, any idea?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 12:42 PM
5

Happy Monday my brethrens 🤗😘❤️
/r/MensRights11/10/22 07:54 AM
2

Haha I knew it was coming.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 06:19 AM
2

Congrats, you can be a judge! In Spain a female judge said she could smell an abuser just by looking at him
/r/MensRights09/10/22 03:59 PM
8

Being redpilled in a nutshell means not getting screwed over by either conservatives or the feminists. They both will f you up if you let them.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 09:18 PM
43

Imagine a court said "he can divorce you, not give a dime and you're still liable to give him X amount of sex per month oh and he's keeping the babies".
/r/MensRights07/10/22 09:14 PM
1

Lessons relearned: therapists belong in the Matrix, men's best course of action is to steer clear of them, any attempt to try and 'work things out' will blow and you will be outnumbered and have a LEGAL(LY ENFORCEABLE) opinion to screw you over at any point. Not to mention it's the second last form of simping to pay for someone's opinion who will be used against you - the ultimate one being cuckoldry of course.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 05:26 PM
1

📯 Don Demarco
/r/MensRights07/10/22 05:19 PM
0

Wtf bro'? Are you asking if fucking over 65 women is desirable?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:45 PM
2

Good. Means they're losing.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:42 PM
2

Pointless article. I'm getting more and more adamant on the fact that men only seek information about power and how to develop it, other men in the Matrix will always find it convenient to shit on most men.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:19 PM
2

You assumed it was abusive based on...? Is there a reason other than your misandry?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:01 PM
12

He's a simp who simply wants to have sex with her. He's not your friend either.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:56 PM
10

I remember being asexual used to be a thing, even a protected one, what's the qualitative difference between a MGTOW and an asexual? Oh of course! A MGTOW isn't spending his money on wymmn! MISOGYNYYYYYYYY-IE
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:44 PM
5

Not going back to the plantation is racist against white people lol /s
/r/MensRights07/10/22 03:42 PM
0

"[...]A new study showing that unwanted celibacy is associated with misogyny or pro-rape attitudes." Which in turn is mysandry.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 01:57 PM
5

The no true Scotsman is literally the #1 tactic in the female arsenal. Projection my boys, projection.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:18 PM
0

The male of any species coalise to topple the alphas, once they manage it a new alpha is born. Just alook at them primates.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 12:43 PM
1

Bro your view is so out of touch with reality, I met Ukrainian women who simply fled to avoid war and they took a lot of pleasure when I nutted in them before they moved to another country. /S
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:45 AM
1

Maybe you have an argument apart from shaming tactics? We can discuss about it
/r/MensRights06/10/22 07:42 AM
0

True. Marriage was invented by beta males to have a shot at reproduction. Pussy is antifragile with or without marriage it's the same, no marriage? Whatever I'll get banged by Chad. Marriage? Whatever I'll get banged by Chad and Beta Billy will help me raise the kids.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:46 AM
10

Yeah as well as Chad's and Tyrone's
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:17 PM
6

Not to mention that women live longer, however, no sane man ever asked to extend retirement age for women due to higher life expectancy. Equality is equality but feminism isn't about equality, it's about power and reducing the world population.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:46 AM
1

A colleague of mine. She made the mistakes the customer accused me of doing
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:35 AM
3

Yeah but I work from home. I'm also grown up enough to know that spoken things don't matter. For instance in a meeting the day before she was boasting about being able to wait 1-2 even 3 days so as to look like she's cooperative and good-hearted. Of course I knew not to take a woman's word at face value for next time around her actions/judgement (or lack thereof) will be based on her current situation, so I did it but she still complained AFTER the thing was done. She then had the chance to beha…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:31 AM
7

Thanks for the tip. The thing is, in my experience manager don't investigate/care about proofs because the Gervais principle. It all boils down to how good a charmer you are and it is always determined in those 5-10 mins when you talk. That's when you either go up or down, keep track of everything has proven numerous times to be unnecessary because the game is rigged to begin with.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:23 AM
2

Imagine making a money upfront deposit in case she doesn't put out. The crust of the Earth would break open with feminist demons invading the city lol.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 10:02 AM
2

Would be interesting to know on behalf of whom and for what purpose. Also whether violence is merely physical or not. (e.g. a female coworker who makes fake annual reports of your performance and as a result of that you get fired).
/r/MensRights28/09/22 06:22 PM
1

Equality?
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:52 AM
3

As per the Gervais principle: Sociopaths don't want money, they want easy money.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:17 AM
18

Vanuatu has won less Olympic medals than the USA, let's give Vanuatu more medals.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:15 AM
8

Imagine suggesting something like:change your behaviour. While he yells make mental notes and then don't do the things he's reproaching you for. He will stop Then see the results. Then slap them with one of the millions of articles from psychology today that suggest men do what women demand to make them stop.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:24 PM
2

Taxes = the ultimate form of cuckoldry. In today's environment at least. They left my grandma to die in a hospital corridor cause there were no beds.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 12:38 PM
1

Well the State has no incentive to make paternity test easy.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:21 PM
1

Yes that's definitely a downside, the cost would skyrocket. True.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:19 PM
1

I don't get your point. Why paying for sex?
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:18 PM
0

I defemminised her in a month or so, she's still on of those who "will never have a baby" and I told her I'm gonna have with another one I'm dating (we're into poly, swinging, don't cohabitate etc) and she's fine with that.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:09 AM
1

Well it's like a house insurance, you can choose the amount to insure, maybe there could be a provision "up to the amount ordered in court" with successive indexations based on the legal increase. I'm not an expert in technicalities but it's the overall idea becoming socially acceptable. I don't see any reason for it not to be accepted.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:06 AM
1

No, I mean men would pay an insurance to cover paternity fraud should it happen. If you propose that women pay for it you'll have a massive upheaval tomorrow.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:02 AM
2

Exactly it's the old "better than nothing" idea.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:00 AM
2

It would be a contractual agreement between private people. You pay an insurance company and they would cover child support if you prove the kid isn't yours, no State involved. A paternity test would suffice. The real problem would be to keep the State's hands off it, historically they never granted too much freedom to ordinary people, not in this era anyway.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 09:13 PM
-1

"Controversial Canadian professor" are you guys kidding? The biggest criticism Jordan Peterson receives by many, me included, is that he's not politically incorrect enough.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:34 AM
1

I'm 5'9 and fuck left and right with Tinder
/r/MensRights19/09/22 02:28 PM
6

Children verification. No-make-up verification. Right-picture-angle verification. Notch count verification. Breast size verification. Shall I continue?
/r/MensRights19/09/22 02:27 PM
1

Then you certainly have a clue about why men initiate more divorces and women protect men with their lives. Oh wait... it's the other way around, maxim confirmed.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:19 AM
2

https://en.1lib.pl/book/3436775/1fdb69 ​ Know your enemy.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:16 AM
3

The book is a misandry manual. I'm almost done reading it and it's outright criminal. ​ It can be found here: https://en.1lib.pl/book/3436775/1fdb69 ​ I encourage nobody to buy it. Pirate it. We should lobby to find who the author of the book is and cancel her (even though there's a small chance it might be a man). For American people on here, you guys should campaign to extend the death penalty to cancellations ending in suicide.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:14 AM
-4

The hierarchy of love states that "men love women, women love children and children love puppies". It's just a maxim but pretty explicative of how nature intended when it comes to love. It clearly mirrors the hierarchy of hate, too. More men kill women than the other way around, more mothers kill children than fathers and guess who kills more animals just for the sake of it. We need to dismantle the bias that favours women.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 07:21 AM
1

In my life I was raped 3 times, plus one which was statutory rape but I don't consider it a negative event, actually it was my first time. 2 were "full" rape episodes, 1 was digital and 1 statutory. Well, women who heard my story would immediately default to "men can't be raped" and laugh it off. Society, the judicial system and all this feminism BS can only stand if there is an empathy asymmetry between the sexes.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 06:45 AM
3

This is not common sense, it's a reiteration of the feminist mantra. In your view men keep having 0 say on the matter. The war of the sexes has pushed one another to far away, let them have their on-demand abortions but only in exchange for paper-abortion.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:43 AM
1

Yes, that's correct. The problem is for the 80-90% of guys who don't get any sex, not for women lol.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 10:15 PM
1

For 80% of men it is, if not outright 90%, and even if we all turn into Keanu Reeves tomorrow women will be banging the Brad Pitt's. Here's a problem that's unsolvable, but it was just an example. OP's post was brilliant and spot on.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 07:46 PM
1

Here's another appeal to lose because morals. All the while, they will quadruple down on their misandry and win another piece. We should SERIOUSLY consider banning people who are not helpful to the cause, and yes I know that's the same schema feminists use with their in-group/out-group dynamics, but they work and they are not so scrupulous about using them. A question to you, OP, what do your higher morals dictate you do when there is a problem you can do something about it but choose inaction a…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 07:41 PM
7

Yeah, and that's the problem you moron. There's a matrix with 4 possibilities: men on men, women on women, men on women and women on men crimes. Coming up with "gendered" violence, instead of violence is sociopathic and people like you deserve being put into asylums.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 05:54 PM
6

Yes, if we want a change we need action
/r/MensRights03/07/22 12:03 PM
2

No he's doing that for free and he will most likely die, the odds of you being murdered as a prostitute are abysmal.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 09:58 AM
11

You nailed it. I got a guy who fell in love with my Xbox avatar thinking I'm a woman, this guy is suicidal since he doesn't have anyone. I tried to talk him out of it giving him red-pill advice but if I'm offline for a day he starts again, most men need companionship, not sex. That's why hookers aren't nearly as popular as the demand for intimacy, not sex. Besides, how do I convince this guy to go to the gym and hit on many women?
/r/MensRights03/07/22 07:30 AM
1

Hypergamy
/r/MensRights02/07/22 05:36 PM
2

"OK, no problem come back when you understand/understand first and then we can resume our talks. Btw the children store over there offers comic books describing the problem, maybe you want it read by an adult of your choice? I'm sure he's gonna help you understand." Sometimes sophistry is required.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 05:35 PM
1

"there's a fairly well-defined period" this is the most unscientific thing I've ever heard. When Galileo came up with the idea that the Earth is round the consensus in the scientific community was that it was flat. The scientific community still abide by the usual politicking and in-group/out-group dynamics. We have seen what happens to dissident doctors during the Covid-19 experience. With abortion is the same, say that a doctor really thinks that a 2-month old fetus is still capable of feeling…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:04 AM
0

Yes, women have a nature. Men have a nature, too. Your beta behaviour/mindset won't get you anywhere in life. In order for us to coexist we need to accept that and strategise accordingly. You don't belong here.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:49 PM
1

Yeah but it's not just that. You'd imagine they'd campaign to revert the law back to where it was right? Wrong! They took that pretext to campaign for on-demand abortion.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 03:54 PM
0

You are still green an uneducated. I suggest you learn women's nature first and, later, how to deal with them in a constructing way. Giving them what they want upfront is going to get you nowhere. Also you can't simultaneously talk about being constructive and use ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 03:52 PM
2

With the tinge of "dogs and jews can't enter" that we experienced one century ago, this time around it's about sex.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:47 PM
2

Yep, I watched a movie about this guy losing his wife and being in denial, the guy goes bat and destroys his house, turns out she had an ecography and was pregnant but few child wasn't his. The mother had crashed in a car accident where he made it out alive but she died. Well, while the family was commemorating her, her mother tells him that she was pregnant by another man and than she would have kept the baby but her daughter chose not to. I mean wtf? And he was supposed to take it to the chin …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:43 PM
0

Of course I don't, but the realm of politics is like this. Everybody is vying for "victimhood credits" at that point economic theories come into play. If you extended the same rights or empathy or comprehension to all categories then the leading one(s) won't keep their market share anymore and you'll only have "inflation" pardon my metaphor with regards to empathy. That's why, for instance, "all lives matter" will get you screwed even though its supposedly morally unassailable, because the ones …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:18 PM
2

They are still men. Own goal :) You see that this entire thing - which is called "moving the goalpost" - only made you realise that elevating a hardship presumed or not to the rank of objective reason so as to grant a (pseudo)right is completely moronic in your words? Therefore, women's burden of pregnancy is completely misused to grab more rights. PS: to answer your question, to the end where you'll find that most men are deemed UNATTRACTIVE, 95% of them don't meet the bar in dating apps, there…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:53 PM
1

That's a strawman. According to Occam that's better if it's simple though. I suggest you study a lot of data concerning hypergamy so as to have a thorough understanding of how hard most men have it, all because they're physical traits are not in the top 10% or even less.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:24 PM
3

Yes. And I also think that by and large women are posers who overestimate their hardships while minimising men's. I recently saw a video about the war in Ukraine where a Russian PoW was nailed to a cross then set on fire, do men now have a right to drive golden Lamborghinis at 18 to make up for that? After all it's a gendered problem isn't it? You see how far you can go? To keep it medical, men's chances of having a heart attack are higher do we need to mandate less stressful jobs because of tha…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:21 PM
3

Women broke the old social contract, no amount of you overcomplying with it or undertaking more responsibilities like Jordan Peterson wants you to is gonna fix it. The only shot we have is to rescind it and build a new one which takes into account our needs as well, with the understanding though, that once a new balanced compromised has been reached women will have all the incentive to break the agreement (see Briffault's law).
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:18 PM
6

Because they know they're only worth to hypergamy is the financial one. Street-smart men like most workers are know this, of course they refused. Women would never give them a chance if not only are they at the bottom of dominance hierarchies but also choose to be lazy and poor. C'mon, try to see the problem from their perspective. Women's love is opportunistic
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:15 PM
3

Bro' sorry for trolling but let me tell you a century of sneaky lies made you frame the contours of the problem according to the feminine imperative. Not paying for child support will grant you jail time. Where is your bodily autonomy now? So if we decide to build a hirlerarchy of judicial safeguards in which body > money then we can eliminate any form of punishment for failing to pay for child support. Do we have some common ground now? No we fucking don't, and you know why? Because the two of …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:13 PM
7

That would entail raising women's taxes only, but if we "fight" for it women will stay at home and we will only be taxed more.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:59 PM
6

Lol you win! :D Or to the father who did want to have the baby but didn't have a say to indemnify him, lol again.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:56 PM
3

So?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:55 PM
3

By your logic paying for a medical operation should not be allowable because the patient is paying money and the doctor is affecting the patient's body.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:54 PM
3

Provided the burden of the proof is on them. They should prove there was and agreement too conceive otherwise nothing will ever change.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:53 PM
6

So sue God or STFU. Seriously, people really think that crying about natural things is acceptable? WTF? Nature is that way, own it. By that logic I could make a case that men have to struggle since they produce more testosterone and than makes them more prone to impregnating the wrong partner since the urge of sex isn't equal and blah blah blah so they should be spared their responsibilities blah blah. Bullshit! That's nature! Besides, I've seen women with flat bellies after 4 children, I could …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:51 PM
9

Then why are you insinuating that men should fight for that since "oh poor women"? Either we both fight for one another or we don't, but hey they're unspoiled of doing it since the hierarchy of love.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:47 PM
10

Exactly by that logic kill a random woman's fetus but not her should not be punished unless he's been in there for over 3 months. Of course this is ridiculous but it's just another proof that they are full of shit.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:45 PM
6

No the reality, the social belief. We don't have scientific proof that you are not a baby below the age of 3 months in the womb, that's politicised science, not science.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:43 PM
14

Which is exactly why this is the right move. Once they'll dread pregnancy like hell, and women do dread reproducing with a sub-optimal mate, then the time will be ripe for making ONE single law in which we dictate our terms and they will theirs, no zero-sum games and shit.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:42 PM
8

Lol in Poland there were 3 options to undergo legal abortion: 1) Rape 2) Grave health danger to the mother 3) Dangerous genetic or chronic diseases of the fetus. Guess who ruled out the 3rd? A woman! And the other women went berserk and defaulted to the usual bullshit I'm seeing in the US: "sex strike!" to make men pay for their sexism lol.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:25 PM
3

It really depends on where you live and ehat you look like, hypergamy is what it is.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:22 PM
6

It's hyperg... oh wait, you're right
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:27 PM
1

Don't vote for this guy.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:27 PM
7

Hope and pray. Why is it like that? Because half a century- if not more - of legalised misandry + the acquiescence of men who wouldn't speak up lest they lose their precious carousel-approved postwall pussy (or their chance at it). Seriously, I don't deny that there are wonderful women who are deserving love and respect but they are wildly outnumbered by their obese uneducated unpleasant brothing counterparts. It doesn't matter what metric you choose, most men better themselves and mature, where…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:03 PM
26

Not true. He husband can still go out and show up 3 days later after having banged tinderellas and hookers.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:39 PM
1

Forget about 1 and 2, they do it because of 3 .
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:52 AM
16

Possible, yes. Probable? Not a fucking chance. Don't keep your expectations high, if she's a crack-head skank and you're perfectly reputable, she's gonna win all the time.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:41 AM
1

Because you're beta. Never let anyone into your private sphere unless you're banging them. And even if you do, vet carefully who can destroy you with impunity and who cannot. Women are not entitled to your attentions.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:39 AM
2

The only thing they truly dread. Use our strength and reclaim our rights. Just to be clear: Force, not violence.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:34 AM
2

Not in the case of paper-abortion. We want equal rights.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:26 PM
0

No I'm not saying that, you are, and for that you'll take responsibility. Besides, how brainless is it to claim that women can't check out of fatherhood? They're women FFS so they can only check out of motherhood! And guess what there are already ways to do it: you can either chop the baby into tiny pieces like sushi and on top of that you'll receive tons of social support and validation, it's called abortion. Moreover, if that was Chad's child but you're too broke to raise, whatever the reason …
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:25 PM
6

That "non-sentient" notion is just a convenient rationalisation that modern "science" came up with just to back up the feminine imperative. Modern science is political not based in truth, you can see a fetus squirm when he's chopped off
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:39 AM
1

One thing that always got me about this abortion thing is cognitive dissonance. I've met a LOT of otherwise reputable people address the fetus as "an amass of cells", a "piece of meat" and the like. They can't hold two antithetical concepts in their minds, so they have to hate the fetus for internal coherence. None of them hates babies. I don't mind abortion, if she aborts then I'm not the best she can do. I'm not her chad and there are many who begged me for a baby so I can afford that. But at …
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:37 AM
0

Bro' I agree but prostitution only solves access to sex, reproduction is another thing. That's why we still get married in Europe and then we are thrown into the meat grinder.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:30 AM
0

No. Women are finessing simps, yes, but the simps' fault not wymmn's. No problem in dangling the sex carrot in front of their beta eyes, simps can still choose not to fall for it.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:28 AM
1

No it's not and it's a dumbass move. Now, I'm not saying that women shouldn't have any reproductive rights because men don't have any, but coming back to a lose-lose "both parties don't have rights" situation can be the propellant for enacting a new law in which we insert BOTH women's and men's rights according to THEIR OWN sexual strategy. If you don't do that women will simply stop to care and we reinforce gynocentrism, they have no incentive to fight for men's rights when theirs are not only …
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:25 AM
1

Oh you don't fucking say! who would have thought that? merely everyone who's got a functioning brain lol. To complement this, I strongly suggest the Rational Male Religion, even if you don't read the entire book the point here is the "love is God" mind-set which is typical of the feminine vs the "God is love" archetypal male way of organising societies. Starting off from the hierarchy of love (which is btw the hierarchy of hate, too) you have that men love women, women love children and children…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:17 AM
2

There are no cognitive dissonances when it comes to optimising hypergamy - Rollo Tomassi.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:39 PM
2

Rest in peace. Men we need to actively look for people in danger of committing acts there's no coming back from, I know most of us are anyway. We need to rewire our psyche and adopt a co-operative rather than competitive approach to one another. If we fail, there's no way of turning this around.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 01:01 PM
1

That's the point, real justice is a myth. The more we (the men) collectively take the decisions with acquiesce instead of being vocal the more a judge would find it convenient to allocate the responsibility on us. In my country there's been a case in which the judge deemed a rape allegation unsubstantiated, what did the feminists do? Did they accept the verdict because they're generally decent human beings who care about society and respect the institutions as well as judicial truth? Of-fucking-…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 11:21 AM
0

No, the only point of having a judicial system is to keep the herd in check, apply responsibility where it's more likely to be tolerated and stop just a tad before people run amok. Justice isn't just, it serves power.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:32 AM
1

You don't know what my mental state is, you don't possess the qualities to ascertain it. Besides, it's women's logic to prioritise feelings over content, feels over reale. You're very welcome to go somewhere else and use that logic. Have you ever tried the knitting club? You have bo place here, please evaporate. You don't contribute anything meaningful towards reaching a win-win. I strongly suggestion you drop the mask and join your misandrist feminist friends. Cheers
/r/MensRights22/06/22 09:14 AM
1

You can't argue with the facts and resort to easy-to-identify fallacies, and now you're appealing to emotion talking bs about "obscenities". I bet you've done all the obscenities in the book so don't play the prude.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 07:45 PM
1

Yeah that's true, statistically offenders tend to commit more crimes, but then it's up to the institutions to protect people. The bulky would beat up the socially award guy for snitching, yes, but at that point it's a criminal offence and they're not going to excuse it. On the other hand no amount of touchy-feely campaigns will ever make teenagers not bully it her teenagers so, unfortunately animals learn like that.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 10:35 PM
2

As well as lack of legal levers to action. Now, rejection is fine. But being bullied and outcast isn't. If there was the certainty that the state would punish bullies then mass-shooters wouldn't mass-shoot. Simple as that. But we know that bullies are the ones who are higher in the pecking order so that will never happen unless... you guessed it! Lot's of mass shooting happen altogether, there's a name for it: war. Societies always get changed due to wars, less likely to happen with political di…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 03:23 PM
1

The solution is simple. Incarceration for non-physical violence, too. Let's imagine a kid in high school is bullied. You lock the bully in for something like a month and take away, obviously, any access to social media. The bully would DREAD being secluded from his/her peers, he/she would DREAD thinking that his/her bf/gf would be banging other people, he/she would DREAD walking into a hostile environment like a prison. And then the bullied would simply smile at them when they meet again. If you…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 03:18 PM
1

Doesn't change a thing according to female pragmatism.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 02:07 PM
1

You don't have enough elements to jump to that conclusion. I could make an easy cade for you being bitter and resentful towards men and that finds an outlet in your indecisiveness and unwillingness to make a countermove. See how psychology can be easily twisted to fit whatever you need to say regardless of its validity? It's just an endless series of truisms meant to cast doubt on the others. Just look at top men of old, they were talking strategies in order to impose their will on the world, th…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 11:20 AM
1

Your movement, which is supposed to call for justice and equality, will turn into one that calls for the supremacy of one group at the cost of oppression of the other; which is what feminism is and always has been. Or 5, you can simply internalise dark triad traits and crush their fragile egos at any chance you have. Do you really think I'm bitter or am self-pitying right now? You can deliver a moral blow without being fueled by anger, that's female-correct thinking which is known as "male anger…
/r/MensRights19/06/22 08:02 AM
1

Ok, you got the last word, you won.. Female logic lol
/r/MensRights19/06/22 07:55 AM
2

Every time a man takes the moral highway 50 other suffer life-changing events. Are you really that virtuous by renouncing all the power you would have to produce a positive change for them? Are you really helpful for them? We both know that women will resort to all kinds of trickery just to get what they want. You're basically fostering hyperagency on men while simultaneously keeping the usual hypoagency and zero consequences for their societally dysfunctional behaviour. Not only is time a varia…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 07:12 PM
2

Until you get cucked and sent to sleep in your car, if you'll have one by then.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 06:41 AM
2

Not to mention that this not being perfect shit is just the necessary countermeasure to the evil that's been cast upon us. It wouldn't be necessary had they not targeted us in the last 50 years or so
/r/MensRights17/06/22 06:35 AM
1

Which in fact were fought by armies who were twice as determined to wip them out. See why it is important to fight back? If you have the power to do something about it but ideology is holding you back then you are responsible as well as an accomplice. You don't have to like it, but you gotta do it for the great good nonetheless
/r/MensRights17/06/22 06:14 AM
1

Yes it's way superior a strategy to have millions of people to stubbornly follow rituals, beliefs, get together and help one another rather than trying to undermine your opponents' tactics and behaviours, however invalid their arguments might be. Doing things like exclusive clubs for me, closed societies in which you hire men who were discriminated against at the work place, creating shelters for men only, self-appointing members who will judge on female behaviour and only find faults according …
/r/MensRights17/06/22 06:03 AM
1

A boner would be more satisfying if you find it but, alas, feminist are notorious for being unattractive.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:48 PM
2

No but you might well hate women and not trust them. There's no a priori condition that makes them mutually exclusive
/r/MensRights16/06/22 06:47 PM
-2

How are the two of them mutually exclusive?
/r/MensRights16/06/22 10:43 AM
14

How dare you not offer free meals as well as easy opportunities for them to cry rape. It's misogynistiiiiiiiic
/r/MensRights16/06/22 10:41 AM
1

Jordan Peterson is a grifter and a charlatan
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:09 PM
2

*too
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:01 PM
1

Still here? Go learn some skills like dick sucking and cooking and maybe you'll be able to find a man, if you aren't an uggo that is 😉
/r/MensRights14/06/22 06:30 PM
2

The right to kill is the strawman women use when they are confronted with the responsibility to change their behaviour, the examples given were all crimes such as false allegations. You can leave this group and join your penis-hating sisters, your inability to take men's points of view and build a healthier society makes you unfit to be around here. I had waaaay more women than you'll have men committing to you, or God forbid wifying your bratty little princess ass up. Lol
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:45 PM
2

Well it's about time we abdicate old order responsibilities and leave you to fend for yourselves. You're not entitled to security if we're not entitled to peace of mind. Good luck. You resort to finding all answers on Google cause you don't have what it takes to abstract. Besides if we both gave each other what we want and compromise there would be LESS killings, not more. But you don't want that, you're here for the attention and for looking "good". It's the same problem minorities rights activ…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:27 PM
2

"because men just can’t be arsed to find peaceful solutions" or because women can't think abstractly by and large and make steps back when it comes to forfeiting non physical violence or reward physical one. Men and women will never find balance because women don't compromise, just a tiny fraction does. You clearly are utterly incapable of finding middle ground. You don't understand "mind autonomy" because you don't default to abstract thinking. Actually understanding is also a gendered verb to …
/r/MensRights14/06/22 01:09 PM
2

Oh thank you very much for enlightening the world saying that it's illegal but the fact that it doesn't strike you as violent it's because you fight in the psychological like most people who can't do it in the physical. Don't get me wrong it's not an accusation, it simply means that people fight with the weapons they have and lobby the system to outlaw their opponents'
/r/MensRights14/06/22 10:05 AM
1

Denatalisation is a thing guys, they are doing it the hard way. After some jabs we all know they are polluting the water supply so as to make sperm levels drop. I'm in Europe and that happens in every single country.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:17 AM
2

It's funny how they can get away with the "because they are women" rhetoric. To this day no rapist has ever said "bwahahaha I'm gonna rape you because you're a woman".
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:09 AM
4

Let's start a fundraising to hel... oh wait let's fucking eat pop corn instead
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:04 AM
2

Oh look at who's here, the one who pussed out deleting all comments is back for more :) Again, I invite you to get an education and come up with something meaningful of your own, parroting people's words back at them won't make you any smarter, has it worked so far? Your presence here is not required and your way of thinking is a liability to the cause... oh and thanks for confirming what was obvious - that the female mind endorses certain forms of violence but bot others: "Hiring a killer is no…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:03 AM
4

Emotionally lol. What if she sucks off another dude each Friday? I wonder what the judges' mental gymnastics will be in order to justify it
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:04 PM
2

"So if men are although killed for doing/saying the wrong thing…..then men are overwhelmingly perpetrators of physical and non physical violence. Which brings us back to the start, the root of most violence are men." Apex fallacy *yawn* "You just said men although do/say things to get themselves killed…..so men although fight in the psychological according to your logic and they do it much more then women." buy a statistics book and learn what "frequency" means *yawn* So you want only women inca…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:00 PM
3

Thank you so much. I love comments like this.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 03:43 PM
1

Perfect so let's align non-latin laguanges to the origianl meaning of the word. Words continuously expand their meaning look no further than "stalking".
/r/MensRights11/06/22 03:41 PM
2

Both women and men are capable of non-physical and physical violence but each sex has its preference. Both women and man are capable therefore of non physical violence that brings about physical violence, but men are more likely to hit a an than they are a woman, women too. If People (P) = M + W and People are X (e.g. capable of doing non physical violence) and you think that saying W = X omitting M = X is anti-W then you are using female logic a.k.a. female machiavelinism instead of logic. Yes,…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 03:01 PM
2

Whenever you talk about social things, not mathematical ones, it is important not to be autistic. Beating someone up for an insult (which is your strawman argument since nobody brought that up) is retarded. Falsely accusing someone though is another cup of tea. I feel pretty confident that all falsely accuseden would barted a punch for what they went through (and in most cases that includes the lost custody of their children). What you suggest is tantamount to sending men to the slaughter. The l…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 01:07 PM
2

You clearly don't understand bi-univocal relationships, do you? And to start from the bottom it's "mental health" the one you're denying. And, yes, most men kill other men after saying the peceived "wrong" thing or behaving in the perceived "wrong" way or due to sexual competitions. Or for believing in toxic ideologies like feminism and acting out of prejudice. Most killers are men who kill mostly other men because of women. That's true in wars, crimes etc. in order to acquire more resources or …
/r/MensRights11/06/22 12:51 PM
4

And you have no argument to break mind autonomy, which is another part of the body. On top of that you puss out of arguments and that gives away your true colours. The discussion was about women's preferred form of violence, and their targets as well as men's favourite form of violence and their targets. But you curtail only the part of the argument that matters to you because you're here but you're discussing only the part that you fight for, namely the female/feminist one. This is a good examp…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:42 AM
10

Yes, it's the adult version of the teenage "you didn't let me pass first when I stumbled upon you in the corridor so I'm gonna cry to my boyfriend so that he will smash you" it's simply more refined but of the same kind. Revenge or extortion by proxy.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:23 AM
5

At least they say something I wonder what those poor born babies haven't said yet that prompted all the mothers who kill their children to do it.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:19 AM
4

You reek of beta/feminist. I'm not even gonna discuss your strawman since it's childish. Your inability to see that 1) there are degrees, if someone insults you and and you bet them up then it's out of proportion. Let's make another example someone tells the police you raped her but didn't, now no fingers was laid on the other person but you are exercising violence on the other person by proxy. Your stress levels increase, you risk a cardiac event, you lose your physical shape, your life span is…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:04 AM
10

That's the point. Violence has never meant only physical violence. In my language you'll often hear "all forms of violence" meaning that violence can be anything beyond the physical
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:01 AM
2

Well done.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:01 AM
1

As if they mattered. In a democracy if you're less than 50% you lose. If a thing has merit in an of itself it gets voted and the less numerous party lose. So the entire "but feminists won't allow it" baby cry shows 1) how influential feminists are 2) that they would uscoercion at the top level 3) that said politician's party should not be voted
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:00 AM
0

And there are women who get away with rape. I was raped 3 times.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:52 AM
1

Post a like that 99.9% of the times it's assholes who got caught or you're talking shit.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:51 AM
2

Corporate behaviour should match the law of the Country they operate in. Needless to say they don't care, this is a soft form con colonisation 2.0. Nobody actually voted for them and have zero legitimacy. However, the world doesn't work as it is written in law books and politicians simply acquiesce. In Europe it would be illegal to ban a person from a service, yet they do it because they get away with it.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:48 AM
30

I agree 100% let's just call violation "violence" though. We need to introduce the concept of judicial violence.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:40 AM
10

Great news but it's not enough, she should have gotten the same time as he would have gotten had he been sentenced. And in the case a man is sentenced then found innocent she should get the double.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:39 AM
2

Exactly, according to men's if-then logic it makes way more sense to try the legal way first, when it repeatedly doesn't work in the way it should men resort to DIY justice because we are testosterone fuelled. But it wouldn't have happened had the system worked in the first place.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:32 AM
6

This. 100 years ago people we not able to get away with saying things or behaving in ways most women do now. It's always that psychological that triggers the physical. Not to mention that drugging little boys IS INDEED physical violence mixed with psychological- of the worst kind, since they can't retaliate. But it doesn't even enter the back of people's heads to frame it as such. As much as it does t enter people's head that mothers killing babies is infanticide rather than the vague "post-labo…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:30 AM
6

Or to teach women not to use psychological and behavioural violence. The truth is men are likely to default to physical violence and verbal and passive aggressiveness are secondary. Women are likely to default to verbal violence and passive aggressiveness and physical violence is secondary. Non-physical violence brings about physical violence. You genuinely want to do something about it? Then punish non-physical violence with the same jail time physical violence grants you. You'll see a huge dec…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:27 AM
1

So your wife "has to" have sex with you? Bro we have no elements to say it's forced, that's feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 03:14 PM
0

It is also a fragility problem. When will population start to rise? When oil was used. Who dug oil in the past bringing this about? The élites. Where on earth did we have the biggest increase in natalità? Asia and Africa. Who's gonna die? Ordinary citizens in the West. If someone shoots at you we call ot bad. If a war breaks out we say it's bad. If the élites create a problem then cast the responsibility on the masses you talk about the shit sandwich. I know you don't like it but this is tantamo…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 03:12 PM
3

Yours is fallacious as well. You start off from the assumption that people say and/or fight for what they think. You don't have to think something in order to endorse it, people are perfe trying capable to lie strategise. If you focus on the feminists who really think that equality is a desirable method to organise societies it's the small fry you're focusing on. The elistes who promoted feminism in order to bring about the depopulation don't belive for a second in their own bullshit, but of cou…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 11:48 AM
0

I'm in favour of that. Smell poo 💩
/r/MensRights05/06/22 10:31 AM
1

It's sexist and misogynistic to prohibit prostitution. After all its women's main proclivity and they always default to it when all other means fail, so why not. The question is, why would you attend prostitutes? It just means you can't get pussy based on what you've got.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:35 PM
20

EXCEPT she's getting sex every time you do, so for her there is a free and even net positive meal
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:16 PM
7

Women objectify men both sexually (a.k.a. alpha fucks) and financially/parental investment (a.k.a. beta bucks)
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:15 PM
1

Well I Europe you don't have the right "not to serve" anyone. And thanks goodness. What would happen if you don't serve Jews for being jew or black people for being black, guys for being gay etc etc? In Europe such a policy is null and if they sue the owner is in big big trouble.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:13 PM
1

We hold two thirds of the burden. Lol. Maybe because you fucking went to university and can't repay the loan? Besides, if a man had a student loan and was unable to repay it most women would even consider him as a partner. Repaying wymmn's loans is the ultimate frontier of beta bucks, just another burden to be placed on men's shoulders (taxpayers) and no pussy in return. What a joke, thanks goodness in Eurppe those things don't happen (yet).
/r/MensRights04/06/22 12:56 PM
-7

That policy is null, should you enter anyway and push away whoever obstacles you is perfectly legal
/r/MensRights02/06/22 12:29 PM
2

Again, I agree. I think most men are not proactively looking for a fight. Most men would not fight unprovoked, most men are respectful, most men would live you alone IF YOU LEAVE THEM ALONE. But women don't, sociopaths on top don't. Ego, soul they both get trumped by strategy. Which one do you think wins in real life? Men don't want to but need to learn all these tricks to fight back since we are under seige.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:49 AM
2

Congrats for beating the cancer, as well as your physical disease.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 06:54 PM
1

You're only gonna lose. At the end of the day they're still women sl if they misreason/come up with invalid arguments the burden is still on you not to hurt their feelings, so you're set up for failure. I don't think MRAs should involve feminists in any way, shape or form. Did feminism include men? Did it win the cultural war? We all know the answer, therefore a diametrically effort is now needed.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 06:52 PM
1

Yes, that keeps its validity but what about "they" prove "themselves" first like MRA/RP women and then we make allies?
/r/MensRights01/06/22 11:15 AM
6

What other women doing for men's rights though? That give you a perspective of how much they are willing to fight for men's issues and the extent up to which an alliance is possible.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 07:57 AM
0

I don't know how we shifted from agreeing to disagreeing disagreeing the space of one post but whatever. It's not a few individuals, it's about 50% of the population who either proactively or passively endorses everything. I haven't found ONE woman who - say - endorses paper abortion, yet 100% of them endorses abortion. This is just an example that shows how much women care about men's points of view. Problem A. "You cannot limit the freedoms of a group based on a few individuals" if you constra…
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:48 AM
1

I agree with everything, but there's a thing that may potentially get in the way which is male anger bias. It's not just women per se who might see men as violent more frequently than we actually are - it is worth noting though that all of us have the capacity for murder and the like - but all it takes is one or a few sociopaths on top, and there will always be socios on top, who will portray some grim situation to women in order to sell them some safety which in the vast majority of the cases m…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:47 PM
3

Me too, many other men wouldn't too. But in case a war breaks out they will force you to. And women are adamant about that, they can puss out of the country, yet demand death penalty for deserters... as if they aren't. Just look at the feminists now and the ones putting a white feather on diserters' uniforms back in WW1 or 2, I forgot. And so you'll end up dying fighting to protect Chad's and Tyron's offspring and girlfriends while odds are that you won't make it out of there alive. Nobody shoul…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:22 PM
2

My take on that is that a) on average women are incapable of identifying or sympathising with men's issues let alone caring about that and b) once they are given legal recognition of any of the things they're fighting for they will simply go Briffault on our asses. So... the best course of action is to strip women of the privileges they accrued (e.g. abortion rights) and THEN we can cooperate provided BOTH voices are heard SIMULTANEOUSLY. For example: you want abortion rights back? Cool, but in …
/r/MensRights29/05/22 11:39 AM
8

Because they fucking need us. For example in times of war. Men should remember about this and set their own price, you want X from me? Cool I demand Y.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 09:40 AM
5

And the opportunities you lost (relationships, financial, reputational) And the jobs you'll never have cause we know that even though a man is acquitted still the stain remains.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 08:51 AM
3

In the big numbers the expected value goes to zero that way. It should be punished more so as to disincentivise people.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:16 AM
6

It should be punished with twice the amount of time you'd get had the falsely accused person been convicted. If you merely give them the same amount of time out if 20 million someone would get away with it. If you use the judicial system to violate someone you're like someone who hires a hitman to kill a person, you don't even have the balls to do it yourself and the result is the same.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 07:15 AM
1

Maybe it's worth a read to counter strategise.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 12:07 AM
2

Your mental point of origin is them, not you. That's why you lose. That's gonna make some hate men more? Who cares if you neuter more. Besides, are you sure that linking their asses will bear fruit? I don't think so. It is a war, a cultural one. You can either win or lose. If you lose more men will suffer for longer. You're not better, you're just bartering their feelings for some other men who will be affected but this current state of affairs. We need a change and we need it QUICK, within out …
/r/MensRights28/05/22 11:23 PM
2

Kill them with kindness doesn't work, not if your opponent is in bad faith or hates you. You wanna kill them with kindness? Fine. Just don't foster your standard onto others. Pacifist means take time and while you squander time trying the subpar solution others will suffer and you are part of it since you could do something about it but chose the slow road. Besides, ones you achieve what you want it is not guaranteed to stick. The allies fought the nazis, fast forward 2 generations and it's all …
/r/MensRights28/05/22 10:25 PM
2

You use feminist jargon (incel) and expect to effectively fight them? I'm telling g you, grow a pair and study strategy, it's for your benefit. Let me put this straight you don't have to BE like them in order to fight back, you merely have to mirror their tactics. Do you really think I'm in real life like the person I'm here? Who cares cause it works! I'm not gonna use sorority mentality but adopting your set of value is a hindrance outcomewise for the community of men. There is a path dependenc…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 06:04 PM
2

Oh STFU playing the sanctimony game will only get you screwed. Men should learn machiavellinism and relative accordingly. WE built societies, WE built nearly everything there is. Not only are we stronger, we're also smarter. So using weapons that work and discarding weapons that don't work is the best course of action. PS: apart from shaming tactics, your post doesn't say anything meaningful. There used to be a word for men defaulting to adopting the female way of communicating.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 04:24 PM
3

Bro your post reeks of betaness. You keep being your wife's little bitch, I'm fine with that, but here's another standard: men on average wanna fuck more than women do, so are women obliged to fuck at our behest? No? Then we have different standards and so we will clean when we feel like, and they will clean when they feel like. Sorry, not sorry. I've always done all housekeeping chores and never cried cause I'm single, but the moment we accept a theoretical difference that will be leveraged aga…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 04:17 PM
1

Haha yeah sure. And undertake more responsibility? Why don't you lick Jordan Peterson's ass since you're there. Remember that all facilitators, namely judges, shrinks, lawyers will allocate responsibility where the least amount of social turmoil will be. I call this "energy saving mode" since it is way easier to make men "reason" and acquiesce then women or children. Do that though, and you'll lose. You'll have tons of shit shoveled on you, zero wiggle room and they will force you to do things y…
/r/MensRights28/05/22 04:05 PM
2

Not if you win though
/r/MensRights27/05/22 10:04 PM
2

That's why you can still enable an ex-post mechanism like paper abortion. B1tch said she was on the pill but wasn't hmm let's see mwahahaha paper-abort and good luck with that. Simple.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:59 PM
1

What you're saying is certainly pragmatic advice that should be followed but from a moral point of view in that scenario all a man is guilty of is believing someone else's word. By accepting it you foster hypergency on the guy and hypoagency on women, well done. Again with this society taking the tab, by your logic I can make an easy case for honest non-rapist people being allowed to ask for compensation for part of the taxes they pay that are spent on security. They're taking the tab for rapist…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 07:13 AM
1

Yes. Can we agree that only one consists of people who CONSISTENTLY try to change in a non-zero-sum way? Its not by pointing out that all genders have problems that we will solve anything.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:50 PM
2

You arbitrarily decided it is "his" responsibility. Lets assume she told me she was on the pill but wasnt, he should have a right to paper abortion as much as she does if she finds out that she got impregnated by a beta. Someone taking the tab? His choice, you dont have to wife up thot mothers
/r/MensRights10/05/22 09:04 PM
2

Better that than the outcome. I'll repeat this ad nauseam, if the child is unwanted then men should have the same right women enjoy. If the child isn't even yours (cuckoldry) that is the worst evolutionary thing that can happen to a man, to be liable for someone else's child with virtually zero wiggle room to come on top of it for other women will NEVER take a guy who's burdened UNLESS he's Chad. That's the male equivalent of rape (please don't be autistic and say men can be raped, too, which is…
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:43 PM
7

You could easily go about that by instituting paper abortion.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:45 AM
3

Still discriminatory against men, women can give babies up for abortion. Cucked fathers can't.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:42 AM
-2

Feminists are still women - failed ones, unattractive ones, low-value ones whatever, they're still women - so lo' and behold they will adopt female tactics in time of trouble, including seduction and sex-bait.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:40 AM
14

For every man who gets abused for being short there should be a woman who gets pumped and dumped for not having a D cup. Rejection is fine, abuse is not. When you're not tall women will exploit you for everything and height-shame you and if you come up with something reasonable like "if you don't like my height then stop wasting my time/money/stop using me for validation" then all of a sudden society turns hostile towards you, while women have the right to complain about guys not calling them ba…
/r/MensRights01/05/22 04:56 PM
3

So his only rebuttal to his previous true claims is "do better, c'mon"?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 10:39 AM
0

By hundreds of them, always got away with it.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:03 AM
20

It's also sexist to assume that an entire gender will react violently. Totally unacceptable.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:31 PM
7

I agree she should serve time in the case of paternity fraud.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:30 PM
12

No I'm saying they are guilty for not allowing it, you're saying that and you take responsibility for what you're saying. I'm saying that not allowing evidence to be collected amounts to guilt. In the case he's not the father he should be compensated and she should leave the house. In an ideal world cuckoldry is punished like rape, because to each gender that's the ultimate crime.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 01:29 PM
29

And why would a man lash out if a woman didn't commit paternity fraud?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 12:16 PM
15

If you think that a man can impregnate 2430 in the space of 9 months, then you're probably a woman.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 12:14 PM
-16

I'm fucking advocating for the same standards of justice but it won't happen until beta males choose it's not worth it to fall for the reproductive blackmail.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 05:58 PM
-31

Didn't say that. I said beta men are lax on women because they wouldn't remove an opportunity out of the pool. For example Jodi Arias was somewhat a 6/6.5 there was absolutely NO chance she would be given the death penalty because someone down the chain of hierarchy got his dick sucked and now she's in jail. If they learned to let go of an opportunity and properly punish women in time society will hold them as accountable as it does men.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 02:51 PM
-74

It's beta men's fault. If they ignored the possibility of reproducing with a criminal in favour of convicting said criminal, in the long run we will have more accountability for women.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 11:57 AM
5

Women commodify themselves because it works. I'm yet to see a pic of a murderer which is not blatantly posted to appeal to emotion. Semi-naked bitch to elicit protective responses.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 11:31 AM
5

When common sense was common people steered away from so called professionals since once you have a certificate that states you are X (mentally ill, prone to outbursts, psycho, anything) that can and WILL be used against you even 30 years down the road. Don't ever give your enemy ammo.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:09 AM
2

Rapee blaming is the ultimate form of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 07:22 AM
2

Poland is one of the last traditional holdouts along with Hungary, but it's falling. Soon enough those traditional women with long hair will be turned into man-hating short haired monsters.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 06:42 AM
1

Can't you just identify as a woman at that point? I mean you could claim you're a woman casually looking at another woman lol.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 05:51 AM
5

For the sex worker or for the buyer?
/r/MensRights23/04/22 09:47 AM
8

Just deny you were staring at someone, if they insist they saw you then they were staring at you and call the police on them. In fact the very fact someone realises he/she was being stared at makes him/her guilty for staring back.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 06:39 AM
14

Let's all refund games unless men are given the same amount of extra days. We die sooner so we need extra compensation days lol
/r/MensRights23/04/22 06:31 AM
8

Evolutionarily they survived like that. We won't hire a potential competitor. It would be nice to know if ugly women select out attractive ones and whether short and not muscular guys select out traditionally alpha mâles.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 09:46 PM
4

Empty ad hominem. Not even worth considering. Again normal people with IQ higher than 60 got from what I wrote that I'm talking general terms, not this case. You not addressing the point means you don't have a counter. yawn
/r/MensRights22/04/22 09:26 PM
7

Get the fuck outta here you feminist troll. Just because you FEEL someone is gonna retaliate doesn't mean he will. It's just another way for you to pre-emptively accuse some innocent guy of doing something he's not done yet, and perhaps never will - again solipsism alert, I'm not talking about his case, I'm abstracting. Non-cucked cultures have a term for this: reverential scare. Just because I'm scared - or even worse I merely claim I'm scared without there being any proof of me actually being …
/r/MensRights22/04/22 09:01 PM
8

I didn't miss any part, i just claimed that women's opinion is not hierarchically superior to men's. Not to mention your inability to abstract,it must be really sad to live as solipsistic beings! I wasn't talking about this specific case, I'm abstracting and her feelings aren't indicative of anything.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 07:11 PM
2

Because solving the problems would strip the so called professional of their livelihood. It's the theory of agency, their interests conflict with social ones therefore they'll prioritise their own monkey making scheme over what's socially good. The Chinese used to pay their doctors when people were good so that this problem wouldn't be there. Try and pay professionals depending on DV rates, they'll flip the narrative and address the root cause like you are doing right now.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:23 PM
2

All good except you are legally in the wrong. You would be in the clear, though, if you impaired your own career BEFORE meeting a woman to have kids with.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:20 PM
2

Good news for cucks, have someone run her over and now you're even lol.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 03:49 PM
5

"it isn’t a healthy relationship if she feels she can’t say no." BS. Just because she "feels" she can't say no, doesn't mean there will be consequences if she does. They didn't check for neuroticism or male anger bias. Should such a view take place (and it already ahs) then her word is enough to weaponise her feelings against you.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 03:32 PM
5

The offenders' pics cough cough mugshots are always appropriate I see.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:41 PM
7

You see? The burden of performance is still on men's shoulders. Who fucked up the world? Feminism. Who do you expect to do something about it? Men. This is not sustainable, for even if you succeed that's not gonna buy you much time or authority. Did the allies unfuck the world by eliminating the Nazi threat? Yes. Did it last? No, just one lousy generation. Was achieving free speech a milestone in the history of mankind? Yes. Did it last? No, we got cancel culture now. So 1) men need to make an e…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 09:47 AM
11

Bullshit. He's choosing strategy. He's choosing staying alive over getting his ass whacked by someone else, be it the State or another country, under conditions which WERE NOT CHOSEN BY HIM. He's choosing antifragility over fragility. We should teach men to desert and that that's not immoral or less noble. You pick up your fights, not someone else's. On top of that, no you don't contribute to your own destiny unless you're isolated and/or can exercise real influence over people like throwing the…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 07:11 AM
21

Wait. Although I agree with your idea that MIGTOW is not conducive to any success, at least in this day and age, you're slippery slope is incorrect for it is based on 2 flawed assumptions. The first one is that the cause of inaction is cowardice, it's not, it's antifragility. The FIRST thing you wanna do in most cases if you wanna win is to limit the losses first, or the exposure to a potential life-impairing loss and THEN but only then do you take action. There's a path dependency if your defen…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 06:02 AM
6

Usual Jordan Peterson rhetoric alone with many others
/r/MensRights21/04/22 02:38 PM
10

Ok, I'm just pointing out he's making a mistake. Don't rescue her, make her work for the relationship
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:46 PM
10

Yet you are. If she can't afford it, don't save her. The State won't save you, remember this.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 05:37 PM
0

I'm not in the US but this is what I did. I bought my own apartment, another one in a different country. I started up a company with a friend, I rented my apartment to my company. I turned that apartment into a studio full of equipment for the company. Now, if I meet someone I want to have kids with I'll simply rent another apartment with her since mine "isn't suitable" for raising a baby, and in fact it is a business like office now. If she sows me a DNA test then I'll donate my apartment to my…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 05:36 PM
12

And the news is?
/r/MensRights19/04/22 05:20 PM
1

Yes I know and I have, 3 times. Yhe thing though is that if I we're cuckolded that would be waaaaay more painful. I know that rape calls for an automatic introduction to say how disgusted you are, and in my case it wasn't nice but it wasn't that tragic either, it is a trauma you can recover from in my case with ease. But being cuckolded? There's no way out of it, I wouldn't care if I got raped again but I would care A LOT if I got cuckolded. I think rape should be redefined and - no, not the way…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 03:58 PM
1

Q1 you can only plan AHEAD. I'm deliberately impairing my career and not developing my full potential since I've got a strong desire for children but would be raped by the system, so it is important to score a job where you don't do much, have a lot of free time yet pays you more than women because hypergamy. So managerial positions are what you're aiming for. You can simply dump your workload on people and have the time/strength to (re)build yourself. Sorry, not sorry, this gynocracy favours so…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 07:25 PM
2

2) no, it wouldn't. It would make rapes DECREASE especially in those cases when you don't want to finish in her and she holds you by the butt, or she's on top and won't move. Happened to me countless times but I pushed them away. 3) your proposal is bigoted. Men should have paper abortion on demand, like women do with actual abortion. 5) so fucking what? Women do it all the time, also with sperm bank. Men should have unlimited access to ova and artificial wombs, too.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:18 PM
1

Don't leave her, let her empty your balls until she's well in her 30's. In the meantime bang all other women and upgrade when you find a better looking one.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:14 PM
15

1) Men are the sole victims of crucifixion and being set ablaze shortly after (while still being alive), the Azov battalion is known for those things and there are videos on telegram.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:56 PM
-8

It's "touché" not "touchè". I wish feminists were educated.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:52 PM
1

Oh wait, you described me, although I selectively identify as a woman mate.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 11:33 AM
2

Via hypergamy. A woman is very likely o use another man as a pawn to hit you/bully you/vex you.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:59 AM
3

Women have ALWAYS systematically oppressed men. Just look at queens' behaviour, just look at homeless men, ugly men, short men, handicapped men and on and on we go.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:58 AM
2

Yes rights are a zero-sum game, that's what you guys made popular in today's culture. Back in the day when we had a say we would come up with thinkers like Pareto and Rawls who used to take into account non-zero-sum scenarios. In fact a Pareto betterment is by definition holistic. But today it's too late to make the pendulum swing the opposite way since being adversarial is the norm. Besides, women's and men's sexual strategies are adversarial so they're no way around it. On a side note "kill al…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:52 AM
3

It's called expected value, just study statistics and hopefully you'll learn it. Sure we shouldn't give EVERY man a raise because some die - like your blunt generalisation suggests - but we can make a COEFFICIENT that takes labour deaths into account when calculating the wage gap. It's no use to earn the double if you die 40 years sooner
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:45 AM
9

Maybe because they just fuck them but would never marry them?
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:42 AM
11

Intimidated is the new "you are a jew"
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:41 AM
41

Except they won't, thus depopulation, which is what they want. You might care about it or not, up to you, all I'm saying is that hypergamy has its own consequences.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:38 AM
1

I've never raised SOMEONE ELSE'S children, and never will, and always will advise other men not to, since this is one sleazy tactic feminists use. Oh, and since I'm there I'll kindly remind every man that cuckoldry is the male equivalent of rape. Don't be that guy.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 10:35 AM
1

Be my guest if you accomplish that, it would be amazing. But I'm pessimistic about that.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 12:06 PM
1

If you adopt a baby you fragilise yourself by undertaking responsibilities for a kid THAT'S NOT YOURS and never will be. And we'll be here to teach men not to voluntarily cuckold themselves. Not biologically yours? Not your baby. Regardless of what the law states.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 11:55 AM
1

Besides, if you adopt a baby you don't have a child. Not your child, thanks for giving me the possibility to elaborate.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 10:02 PM
1

Fucking nothing. That's what's gonna happen. Women fundamentally lack the capacity to correct their behaviour IN THE WAY the (neoclassic) market dynamic you're describing. They already aren't having babies and are they improving their fitness/attitude/overall likeability? Fuck no, they're buying cats and dogs and weeping and moaning that there are no "good" men around. You can only change men's behaviour by manipulating women's, hell the elites know this.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:21 PM
1

So why do they dump all that money when they have free porn?
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:17 PM
1

You girls are posers, overestimate your achievements while simultaneously downplaying men's. That's still way lower than - say - men who die in war but that doesn't give men the right to choose women's fate (like drafting them all), or men die sooner and yet they don't have the power to tax women more due to their extended lifespans. These are just examples to show that if you have it rough in an area doesn't make you the ultimate overlord and give you any right to choose someone else's destiny.…
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:17 PM
6

It won't, because onlyfans simps are NOT looking for sex, they're looking for intimacy. It takes a lot of courage not to have a baseline healthy degree of narcissisism, you basically unconsciously tell yourself "hey I don't gave what it takes to reproduce out of my own merit".
/r/MensRights14/04/22 06:39 PM
2

That's a very low number compared to the ones who actually don't, as usual the feminist rhetoric would like to barter something very unlikely to happen for a sure thing (he's distraught for losing his son). That's not acceptable. Besides, abortion for health complication is a thing and no one is questioning it.nice moving the goalpost anyway, in this case we're talking g about an ELECTIVE abortion, the entire "ommugud she COULD die" argument doesn't hold water.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 06:18 PM
0

Yes, that's the way feminism taught us, the best answer to a lose-win situation is to go for the lose-lose then wait for society to be aground and then rebuild. You are the ones who pushed from win-win to win-lose, own it.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:53 AM
1

Yours is just nadir fallacy. Ommygawwwd women die giving birth!!! BS o ly a minuscule fraction of them do, and this wasn't the case.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:19 AM
2

That's it. They had sex under the understanding that they would conceive. He chose to have sex giving her not a 'yes' but a 'conditional yes', remove the condition and you remove the consent. That's rape. If I wanna have a baby with a woman and she says yes I'll nest in her, otherwise I would have invested in someone else, that's an opportunity cost here. If you make up your mind e I do too and charge you with rape for I wouldn't have done it had I know you would have aborted.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:16 AM
-18

Sure and go extinct.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:10 AM
12

And more importantly, why aren't over 40 women without kids fighting?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 07:07 AM
4

Bro they're not your children even if you raised for 30 years. It sucks I know but they aren't
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:16 PM
5

Lesson relearned: don't be your uncle.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:15 PM
1

I think that a new alliance would hardly take place, because "rights" are the ultimate - maybe refined - expression of sexual strategies/needs/urges/patterns. My main one would be to have access to on-demand reproduction as women do with sperm banks.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 01:38 PM
1

Well I obviously pegged that threshold out at "what the culture deems appropriate" which should be based on rationality, rather than emotion. I know that's hara-kiri right now cause we lost the cultural war, but you're taking soft examples not extreme ones like I was in my hyperbole. If you punish nothing then I can make fun of you 2 y.o. who got rape right in front of you, if you punish everything then feminism. Now, between these 2 extremes culture had its say (and yes, argomentum ad antiquita…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 06:54 PM
1

I fully agree with the central part. And, yes, their tactic is to make it seem like the reaction was appropriate and, therefore, justifiable. My point is to punish harshly both. First of all because I think it's fair, you don't but that's ok, second of all so that we can leverage that against them but we gotta be united. As of now we are in a lose-win situation in which you will be punished/cancelled for making fun of post-wall baldies who didn't even merit all they have, whereas they will get a…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 06:25 PM
1

You won't be making up my mind, I won't make up yours, so it's time better spent to go to the gym. Although from a strategic point of view you're facilitating women's weapons while simultaneously outlawing men's. Actually if we wanna shift the balance we need a high number of people pushing for outlawing women's weapons. You may think there is no such a thing as non-physical violence but some shrink somewhere will come up with "the silent treatment is emotional violence" and boom you lose custod…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:37 PM
1

Ok so no point in debating. Let's not waste each other's time.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:13 PM
1

You're also mistaking violating a person('s health/integrity/reputation/mind) with violating a thing like an ordinance. Also, the common sense should be based on truth and rationality, that's why we have a problem in our current era because it's all emotions over rationality.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:03 PM
0

Ok last attempt to have an honest and constructive conversation. All you're doing is to desperately look for holes in my logic that's sophistry, not logic. If you fail to answer I will end it here: Do you believe that there are forms of violence apart from the physical, yes or no?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:01 PM
0

No because things are not violating you, people possess the faculty of discernment and are naturally able to judge what can hurt or not, that's the principle the natural law adopts when you study law. That being said, it shouldn't be up to the person to enforce what's hurtful for him/her lest people weaponise it BUT it should be up to what's commonly considered as wrong in this current era which may or may not change. In other words there should be a threshold which is defined but the current cu…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:53 PM
-1

You didn't invalidate the point though. Just used a rather laughable "tu quoques" logic. What's your point exactly? That violence can only be physical? If that's so then all doctors are trolling/lying when they talk about stressed-induced diseases or heart attacks. Is allegedly due to rage an act of suicide since violence can only be physical?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 04:43 PM
-4

Not true. This guys point is that violence can only be physical, all other forms of violence aren't violence. Violence comes from Lation violate which means to violate. Therefore, every violation has a degree of violence. Otherwise the sentence "rights were violated" would make no sense. On top of that, if you are in a workplace for 20 years and one keeps mocking your physical appearance 5 times a day, you don't have any other qualifications to score another job and after 20 years you die of a h…
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:51 PM
1

Wow, how many men would pai £565 or whatever to escape jail? 150 unpaid hours? Lol she'll just scroll IG and FB looking for more boys
/r/MensRights30/03/22 06:45 AM
2

This is a generalised problem and I found it even in diplomacy books, the belief that once a war has started no middle way considerations can be done (i.e. aggressors cannot just leave and attacked countries cannot just surrender). Thanks goodness Machiavelli and Robert Greene disagreed with this asinine vision. You can use surrender strategically but no, they want to "win their way" rather than just "win". All the Ukrainian people (women) I've talked with in Europe have this romantic patriotic …
/r/MensRights30/03/22 06:41 AM
1

Clear textbook rape by today's definition
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:13 AM
2

What a simp! I bet Chris Rock will be banging Jada Pinkerton-Simp pretty soon.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:08 AM
2

The problem with this generation, especially in the West, is that you cannot argue at the right level of resolution since your opponents most likely think in binary extreme. Therefore, everything that deviates from Russia bad/Ukraine good is labelled as Russian propaganda. I'm pro both but slightly more pro-Ukraine, however it is impossible for me to give an answer and choose who's fault it is. It's tantamount to answering whose fault it is in the case of active aggressiveness vs passive one (Fa…
/r/MensRights28/03/22 09:08 AM
5

Because a) it's a zero-sum game b) victimhood is a currency and there is place for just a handful of protected groups in the victimhood hirerchies, just like the musical chairs game c) it works d) they cannot be reasoned with. Once they are defeated the same men who had to learn to argue in this way will default to rationality again.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 11:22 PM
15

When they find something ad hominem against you that's inexcusable (racism, omophobia, pédophilie etc) they'll use it, if they don't find anything violative they'll resort to calling you names and refrain from explaining what they mean or what's wrong about it.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 11:20 PM
11

Not only is he a criminal for enacting sexist life-ending policies, he's also a clown for making stupid strategic moves that call for more war instead of less, the biggest example being asking for a no-fly zone, that's tantamount to asking for WW3.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 10:26 AM
3

That's when you tell your friend beckoning at her with your thumb "on I'm so sorry she must have had a traumatic sentence life. But one day she, too, will fall in love and realise not all men are like that". You're gonna lose a friend but win the argument.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 07:05 AM
15

It's violent people like you we should get rid of
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:11 PM
1

It pains me that men resort to name-calling, those are female tactics and it's not very masculine. I know you guys are unwilling to go against the narrative that it's cruel to "force" someone to carry a pregnancy to term necause the zeitgeist wouldn't allow it. Too energy-consuming huh? In reality 98% of abortions are elective, meaning that if a men so desperately craves a child, there's consensual sex (she chose), there is no contraception involved (she chose twice) but then Chad comes along sh…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:00 PM
2

I still enjoy the emotional connection but as for the physical it feels as if I rub my hand with my other hand
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:47 AM
3

They were lucky they had recorded everything. Can't imagine how many innocents are convicted over this.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 07:57 AM
1

I was one week old when I got circumcised and now I'm anhedonic, haven't felt sexual pleasure for years regardless of the partner. I had 500+ for all that matters but it's just the same with everyone so, statistically, it's me not them. Do you guys know if the two are correlated?
/r/MensRights23/03/22 04:28 PM
2

Because they get away with it
/r/MensRights23/03/22 12:38 PM
3

In that case, yes, so let's make things equal: 1) women can go to the sperm bank and men can hire a surrogate mother without egg donor and she would have to carry the pregnancy to term if not she'd be in contractual breach. So we can reproduce free from female clout/blackmail and 2) women can abort and men can paper-abort.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:15 PM
5

What about the baby?
/r/MensRights20/03/22 08:25 PM
-7

But you can force me to see the end of my genetic legacy? F that. If she doesn't want him carry the pregnancy to term and he will be a single father. Also, he should have the possibility to paper-abort, equal rights. Not to mention that in the time spent with someone who's gonna abort his baby he could have found another who wouldn't.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 08:23 PM
2

Not if they're older than 40, at that age equality kicks in. They're equally incapable of bearing a child lol.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 10:00 AM
1

Thotcatalogue lol
/r/MensRights17/03/22 08:56 AM
1

Don't take any side unless yiu wanna make a mistake.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 04:23 PM
1

You don't. Why do you engage in conversation with them to begin with?
/r/MensRights26/12/21 04:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter