TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Idiopathic77 Archive

View 5 posts and 1,220 comments by Idiopathic77 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,220 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Sorry for your experience man, truly. It may not mean much but I can tell you this one man to another. She blew it. If you were holding up your end and she let this modernist "she can have it all" Disney princess Syndrome break you guys up it's her fucking loss. She will be pining over an article about "where have all the good men gone" soon enough. Her misery at that point is her reward for abandoning a real man for the promise of rainbow shitting ponies.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:52 AM
4

You honestly feel that the republicans are the whiners? Excepting the religious right every single whinny bitchy special interest group in America votes democrat. Down vote away. Im not right wing I'm third party. I just call it as it is.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:47 AM
2

Her post was more antagonistic. I just didn't remember the exact wording. I did state something about her husband not having done the other two things and leaving them for her. I didn't include it here because I don't want to just put it into my words.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:51 PM
10

Personally I think that is our sociological desire to praise anyone who is bitching. Even when their bitching is more worthy of scorn.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:44 PM
45

Just have to ignore FB for the most part. A few months ago an old school acquaintance posted something to the effect of; "got home from work tonight to find my husband already asleep. He had gotten home made dinner for the kids gave them their bathes and put them to bed, leaving me to do the dishes and take out the trash." A moms work is never done even after such a long day" I replied to her, amongst all of the likes and praise from the gaggle of hens. "I'm tempted to defriend you because I jus…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:00 PM
1

Rather not. He can be amusing and his opinions on much of the problem within the African American female community are harsh yet accurate. Yet I can't see sending money to a guy who bashes "dark skin women" and "snow men". Honestly when all is said and done it becomes clear that Tommy would just like to have a world where black dudes get to screw and endless stream of white women and the rest of us can fuck off.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 05:33 PM
7

Your thoughts on responsibility would indicate otherwise. And your language is telling. He gets her pregnant, he nuts in her, he doesn't use protection, he does, he doesn't, he he he. Where does she have any agency. Where do we consider her part?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:50 PM
9

Debating you on this is pointless. Because you have adopted the all too common mentality that fucking is something men do to women. Men fuck women so the outcome is their responsibility. That's just not true. People fuck each other. Both are responsible for precautions/consequences. "Man nuts in girls body" How about girls vagina milks sperm from mans cock? This is a consensual act engaged in by both parties. Not one perpetrated one individual upon another.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:20 PM
2

Children are the personal property of women. Men telling women what property to buy or sell is misogynistic. The End. Sincerely, Sociopaths
/r/MensRights19/09/13 07:01 PM
2

But by getting the most attention those nuts actually get things their way. That is a big problem. You may choose to ignore it but you have that luxury. As their legislations do not harm you.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 09:18 PM
12

I saw the head bobbing, hand waving, agressive posturing, snarky bitchy dialogue from the fat purple lady before it even started. Why are theses miserable people put into these positions of athority? Why do we permit these biased and combattive people to make decisions that harm our children? "what gives you the right to discuss the side effects of a medication with this child? Uhh I'm her dad, and she was suffering chest pains.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 02:43 PM
8

If it is any indication of the reaction males get when they fail a suicide attempt; When I slit my wrists when I was 19 the two security personnel who were place to watch me at the hospital each said. Nice move pussy. And the female nurse suggested that I should just man up. And If anyone is wondering if my attempt was sincere. I severed 7 of the tendons in my wrist, exposed bone, and could see my artery pulsing just past the terminus of the gash. Only fate and possibly a guardian spirit kept me…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:14 PM
2

Projection.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 03:20 PM
1

A good term but only on surface. Fact is 99% of these "victims" are actually spoilt children. They run on the principle of "the squeaky wheel gets the grease". problem is that the grease is the blood and sweat and sacrifice of everyone else. Only solution is to either A, live with the squeaks, B, kick the wheel, or C, replace the bum part. I hate to see actual suffering and deprivation. However what most westerners need is to actually experience those things. So that this mundane trivial shit re…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:18 PM
2

I think their idea of Utopia looks worse than 1984. At least in 1984 you had one rule of law, one path. These progressives want authoritarian chaos. Where anyone with a butthurt can lay low anyone the find annoying. The ultimate deciding factor being victim status. If you can be called a victim by any stretching or twisting of reality you have carte blanch to destroy everyone you hate or envy. Its like a societal wide Gomorrah that they idolize.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:26 PM
2

Actually that was utilized often in the US. During the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt the nation almost went into a depression. Roosevelt petitioned the billionaires to kick back to the country which made them rich. The Rockefellers, Carnegies, and others gave money to bail out the economy in return for things such as a park named after them, and some tax breaks. The money they gave was then put into infrastructural work and construction projects to get people back to work. The true shovel rea…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:22 PM
1

I agree, and see all of what you state here. Yet again it is a new world. This is not our grandfathers world. Two factors contribute to most of this issue primarily, along with some other smaller factors. First is automation. In todays world, thanks to automation, one man/woman can do a job which once took up to three people depending on that job. Second is that the population is vastly larger now than it was even 50-60 years ago. This means fewer jobs. Fewer jobs means higher competition for jo…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:16 PM
1

Just the facts.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:59 AM
14

Universities tend to be large with many classes. In the eventuality of an accuser and the accused sharing a class, it makes sense to transfer on or the other to a different time slot for the curriculum, not to out of hand destroy the education of the accused. Unless you are a vigilante scum bag that is.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:40 PM
3

Exactly. Rad fems love to blame everything on patriarchy when it is increasingly obvious that what they are really pissed about is simply not being men themselves. The simplest way to express it is patriarchal evolution. Meaning that somehow evolution itself is a patriarchal construct seeking to make women weaker than men.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:10 PM
1

And pay the guys with the money they took off of their ex in the divorce.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 08:05 PM
5

Correction. Women are superior beings who are short changed in physical strength by a patriarchal evolution. Men should be physically decimated to the level of toddlers to balance the scales and soothe the inferiority complexes of feminists who hate nature itself. But then the women won't be attracted to those spaghetti armed men and the population will die off.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 06:34 PM
7

How exactly are male victims accounted for in the violence against Women act?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:40 PM
3

Comparing now to 1950s is moronic. The US was THE place to be business wise in the 50s. We had great resources in raw materials as well as a hard working educated labor force willing to go all out. That has changed. We now have an over educated entitlement class who see hard work as below them. We have to be competitive with the whole world to retain businesses and lower tax is how we do it. 90% taxes and a spoilt working class = loss of investors to over-seas venture. I may agree with you that …
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:25 PM
1

Honestly you will really need to source these claims. It happens in here all the time. Someone pops in and says "in all fairness feminists are for/against etc" while it only takes a 5 minute google search to discover documentation of major feminists and feminist organizations doing the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:11 PM
3

But..But.. they are progressives. PROGRESSives. see all they want is progress. Progress is good by default.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 05:08 PM
4

In many states, the combination of federal and other taxes amount to over 50% of income on the rich.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 04:06 PM
1

The majority of those dead in the twin towers were fire and rescue workers. A group entirely made up of men. True women do work for NYPD and NYFD, but they were directing traffic in mid town on the 11th of September. As to workers in the building, I can confidently assume that the "women and children first" rule was in effect for the evacuation. And women are still not in combat roles in the US Army so of course their death toll there is low. Yea our fine ladies were doing This instead of This i…
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:04 PM
4

Exactly. She struck me as little more than the typical female protest addict who decided to get on-board with something new and edgy. She is what happens when a tumbler feminist collides with a hipster at high speeds in a socialist hippy commune.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:34 AM
0

Let me know where this sign is and if it is close I'll make this happen.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 08:20 PM
2

Stardusk called this after her first video was featured. He felt it was likely that she was a woman effected by feminist ideology in a negative way, she saw feminism impacting her son so she became an MRM. But not for men in general. It is essentially a shallow solipsistic self incorporation to serve her own ends and not the MRM
/r/MensRights03/06/13 08:08 PM
2

Same Feminist logic. (We are not accountable for our choices) Essentially every single thing they do boils down to infant status for women. I can't even be surprised or upset by it anymore.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 07:26 PM
2

Did you read the article? Do you think this woman is alone? No women are "turned off by pussy men". Look at the top male personalities in media. All physically built, All alpha type persona, All women drool over. Most men like women and want to have sex/relationships with them. To do so they have to conform to those female desires. Maslows' hierarchy of needs. Sexual reproduction > social acceptance.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:36 PM
2

Woman at the bar an old friend of mine tends at. "Your friend is a total pig!' Is there any women in this bar he hasn't slept with?" 1hr later. Found her F'ing my old friend in the parking lot. It may be true that there is a flaw in "the male paradigm". But women responding and rewarding that paradigm is the single most powerful perpetuator of it.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:39 PM
1

Thus my exempting certain situations as well as making an age cap. I am friends with many women in a purely non sexual manner. But it is established from the get go that nothing more will come. It happens in both directions. I have had to shoo away some "friends" for attempting to cross the line. But I find that more women fall into it than men do. Yes asexual relationships can form between men and women, but it is lees likely the younger and singler the parties get.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 02:17 AM
1

I specifically said If both parties are aware and comfortable with their role in the exchange it's all well and good I am referring to certain types of interaction which I have personally observed. And done so not infrequently. This same user type are the ones who start creep-shaming a guy who was a friend, the moment he shows an interest in more. We can pretend to live in a different dimension if you like. But in this one, most single straight young men want more from a woman than to be pals. T…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:19 PM
2

The women who do this are toxic beyond compare. They are the ultimate in users. They gather a stable of gay men who offer her all of the male utility (help her move, physical protection, companionship, interaction with the opposite gender) and she is never expected to reciprocate with sexual relations. She gets all the reward none of the expectation. Then she drags one into bed (often this is done through coercive rape or when intoxicated). Now she gets her physical needs met and still will not …
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:45 PM
1

Glad you mention the "Hags". Here is my take on the "Hag" thing. There is an idea of entitlement within both men and women. Some men feel that they are entitled to a womans sexual attentions. Some women feel they are entitled to a mans companionship. When individuals are willing to trade for that which they desire equality is attained. The hags want the male friend, without the burden of his sexual interest in her to muddy the waters. Gay men are the only sure thing to a woman that hey can gain …
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:38 PM
4

Meh. Would be if so many of the top feminists through history and today had not been man hating lesbians. I don't think it conspiritorial on their part, but it is factual.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:28 PM
1

As I said. I am looking at more modernized traditionalism. I do understand that those things are out there, and they are a travesty. But in western society traditionalism had/has advanced well beyond such things. We can agree that America in the late 1800s was "Traditional", and men were not held responsible for their wives/sisters/and mothers actions. Even as recently as the 1950s much of the west was "traditional" in the most part. And what you say is not the case. My parents had a "Traditiona…
/r/MensRights26/05/13 04:27 AM
0

Nothing wrong with that. I find that it is mostly the new guard type who are researching and exploring the pre-colombus Americas. Their work is fascinating.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:17 AM
6

Differing interpretations of the significance or pros and con of an historical event doesn't connotate science to me. Science to my mind is something which is tested and retested to determine validity. History has always had differing interpretations for differing groups. Just because there is debate does not make it science. JMO don't take offense. I respect historians a great deal. They don't need the term scientist attached in my opinion. History is a massively overlooked study. Also as I res…
/r/MensRights24/05/13 10:11 PM
2

I got out of highschool in 96. This must be the reason.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 10:06 PM
1

I'm flattered. I'm an oddity in a way. MRM is like any movement. Always susceptible to drawing out intensity. The world (not just the MRM) needs more vocal moderates. But the nature of the moderate keeps them quiet. It's a conundrum.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:59 PM
18

When did that happen? Eh I'm getting old. History was considered to be a social (study) in my days. It is not scientific. The branch of history that employs science has a name/names. Archeology, paleontology, geology, etc.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:35 PM
9

wow WOW WOW WOW. WOOOOWWWWWW I hate Richard Dawkins. This is why i'll never buy my children a smart-phone. Immaturity is a disease eating western culture from the inside out.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:33 PM
15

It is a social study. Not a science.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:19 PM
11

Women are under-represented in calculus. Stop flaunting your calculating privilege.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:17 PM
1

Hey I get it. It would be odd for many women. However not AS odd. For those women who use sex toys often using a dildo on themselves is not much different than using one on another. Anyway. I do get that you personally would feel strange, but the % of women compared with the % of men who are comfortable with switching it up like this is vastly different.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:41 PM
3

I would not be the best to answer you here. There is a very well sourced and concise discussion on this posted to youtube by Girl Writes What. I suggest you go watch it. I am not a professional MRA in that I don't keep a logfile of sources etc on hand.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:36 PM
6

There are many studies which find in this way. Evolutionary psych lays it in the lap of males compete for mates so therefore do not bond together in the same way women do. By observing primates as well as other mammals we can see this in effect.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:20 PM
0

It does feel silly. It shouldn't but it does. I guess that the best way to say it is that womens sexual gratification is not dependent upon a penetrative act. Being on the receiving end for a man is a lot more of a switch than simply receiving from another woman is for a woman. It does diverge from the point of the discussion though. Which is women are more likely to live an actively gay lifestyle without actually being a lesbian.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:15 PM
0

That is you acting not being acted upon. Having your pussy touched by a woman as opposed to a man, and having a strap on used on you as opposed to a penis. Those are a bit less of a switch than a man having a penis in his backside. There is no comparable hetero experience to this. That is what I mean.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:03 PM
4

The UK has lower sentences in general for all offenders. However discrepancy is very abundant there. Even parliament has addressed this. Unsuccessfully so far, but it has been noted in detail.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:02 PM
2

That is always true. I've got my respectful and mature lady. And coffee in the morning is key to happiness. She doesn't drink it so avoidance until after shower is helpful :D
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:21 PM
1

No problem. And best of luck to you in finding your respectful man. Your ability to give respect will be your greatest asset in receiving the respect you desire.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 02:39 PM
7

ahh. Ok. It really is a touchy business. Under duress a yes could just be an instinctive action to avoid harm. The definition of what constitutes duress is what needs to be codified. Fear of immediate physical harm is a solid definition for duress. Not "he won't like me is I say no" or "he may say things to people that make me look bad" Etc Etc. And especially not "I feel guilty". MRAs feel that those sub-par definitions for duress are prevalent and endorsed through feminist ideology and legisla…
/r/MensRights24/05/13 02:14 PM
3

It is. It is a standard argument. The gist of which Funcuz hit pretty concisely.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:37 PM
1

I'm sorry for aiding in that imagery.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:20 PM
4

Nothing preventing a woman from scisoring with a guy. Except maybe some bruised balls.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 11:32 PM
8

If it helps, some "choices" have deep reasons for making them.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 11:31 PM
18

I feel the same. However I think that the taboo surrounding lesbianism is far less pervasive. Also, the mechanics of gay sex is different. Where two women will not necessarily be doing anything to each other they would not experience with a man, a man has to be open to a different experience with another man. If you follow my meaning.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 11:13 PM
2

I don't personally see that within traditionalism. Maybe I am looking at a more modernized traditionalism.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 09:16 PM
32

Spent three years living in central Florida. This description fits about 20% of the female population I met there. Bitter, damaged, petulant young women living as lesbians because "men suck" or "guys are jerks". These girls were some of the most self absorbed and entitled brats once you really got to the quick of it. They essentially swapped sexual preference as a form of temper tantrum.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 08:53 PM
2

I'll join the laughter when this is true; So in other words, you have actual victims being lumped together with horny runaway/homeless teen girls who are into older men, basically. Sadly, most non-RadFems would just laugh it off and say that most of that 79% are chicks who wanted sex.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:33 PM
3

The issue here is inequality. You have admitted that you feel gender allows for certain inequality to exist. I contend that it does not. The physical risks on an expectant mother in western societies are no greater (in fact are far lesser) than the risks of a worker. And no, I'm not just talking about oil rig workers. Stress = greater risk of heart failure. More work = more stress. More people die of heart attacks in a week than women die of gestational complications in 10 years.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:41 AM
3

I don't think anyone has the right to tell another person what to do with their body How are the financial resources required by the child/mother obtained? That's right, through the actions of the person required to obtain them. This is done by using ones body to perform work. So in essence you are ok with telling someone what they must do with their body. You are telling them they must work. The work load required to support a child is greater than that required to support only ones self. Thus …
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:29 AM
3

We already have no rights. So why the responsibility.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:21 AM
3

It's not helpful to penalize poor fathers, we do it all the time.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:14 AM
2

Did they suggest any alternatives? I hear Egyptians used a mud and papyrus mixture. Perhaps an old Hopi Indian bleeding tent. I mean hey it sucks and all but until they have some better idea...well... deal.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:24 AM
2

They make me laugh. People that miserable are not worth notice. They create their own word full of spite and impotent rage. They blame everyone in the world for their problems but the source. Themselves. I would pity them but they are to venomous to care for. I'd not find myself the frog swimming the scorpion across the river.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 03:17 AM
2

But...Biology..is a bitch.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:56 AM
12

Use pads? I dunno. Logic is rape.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:35 PM
1

Not sure you are following. The essence is that some women seem to believe that their sexuality has a value equal to more than the value of the mans sexuality. Therefore they determine other conditions or services which any man they have sex with must meet. Otherwise said woman will determine that she was not properly compensated for her sexual acts. Thus she was raped/robbed.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 07:25 PM
2

Orwell did well in demonstrating the slavery that is Sameness in the name of equality.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:20 PM
22

4 ohh my. She needs feminism because men don't hit on her and it makes her feel unattractive. So when feminism succeeds in criminalizing mens sexual preferences she will be free from her own insecurity. Sounds wonderful. Is this why they accuse MRAs of just not being able to get laid? Is it just projection? One of the biggest crimes of feminism is that they indoctrinate women like her rather than referring her to a therapist like she needs.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:58 PM
2

I know. That is what I meant in my last statement. If a problem requires a little bit of self assessment within women then feminism will not touch it. This is why it becomes obvious to outsiders that feminism is an ideology of entitlement, as it goes out of it's way not to challenge its own side. This is why it flip flops on sex issues as well. No woman can be criticized unless the directly go against the movement or challenge the collective. Is a porn star an empowered woman, or a rape toy slav…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:41 PM
2

Required, and compelled to by peers are two different things. Required means you will be sanctioned by your place of work or perhaps fired for not wearing makeup. What will happen is you will be teased by other women. There is so much I want to say to this. But I will leave it. The reason feminism hasn't solved that problem is that feminism doesn't solve anything that requires that women change, only things that require the world to change for women.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:45 PM
1

Have you ever seen him recant anything? He is an entertainer. He knows his audience and he delivers with style. Nothing against him but he is as much a salesman and any other. It is just that the younger crowd likes a bit of snark in their news.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 06:33 AM
1

To a degree. But to pretend that he does not taint the news with his opinion would be wrong. They all do. That's why I only take my news by reading/watching two sources on opposite sides and whatever they both say is closest to reality. where ever the differ is their slant. Closest you get to non biased BS news for entertainment.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 04:15 AM
2

Yea I did. It was a business causal dress code. Ladies wore skirts or slacks and business appropriate tops. It's fine if we don't see eye to eye on it. But honestly it made school less about image and hooking up and popularity and more about the academics. Like I said places like the UK Germany, All of Asia. all of them have uniform requirements in schools and they are kicking our butts in education. Not just because of uniforms of course but the uniforms are a part of the whole reason why. Beca…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:20 AM
2

High school is designed to prepare one for college. College is designed to prepare one for business. The US is one of very few countries that don't have school uniforms for all levels of education. And the countries that consistently outperform us in education all have uniform codes. I also wore shorts and band Ts in high school but I wore slacks and a shirt and tie in college.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:03 AM
1

Humor helps.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:00 AM
4

Well if that is the case they need to grow up and be professional. You will not be sitting on a board some day in your shorts with half your cheeks out with JUICY across the back. And not because of the male gaze but because of the same reason that men are not sitting the board with their shirts off bouncing their pecs. Because it is unprofessional and stupid.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:21 AM
4

The problem with it is that it is a straw man issue to direct more shame at men in general. One cop said something about clothes. one cop.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:04 AM
0

Hang a sign below it that says. Instead of making men responsible for womens insecurities. Teach female students and professors that sex is natural.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:02 AM
3

And Stewarts job is mocking everyone. not delivering the news.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:54 AM
2

Not really. Rampant spending is just a bandage. Value strengthens the economy.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:31 PM
1

Yes at times. And some areas are worse than others etc etc.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:29 PM
6

No one actually says this. When they do both men and women are quick to point out that the person is mentally deficient.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:28 PM
6

Misogynist! Stop trying to control women!
/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:25 PM
1

I'll give a general break-down of my thoughts. People (while not inherently evil) are capable of behaving in ways that hurt society. Both men and women, And members of all walks of life, race, and culture. All are capable of acts that harm others, disrupt societal harmony, and endanger themselves and others. These behaviors should be controlled in order to give each individual a relatively safe and healthy environment, as well as to promote the closest thing to a peaceful coexisting society. Thi…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:25 PM
6

In general the west is slave to materialism and image. But none more so than women. Why else, in a corporate run government, would there be so many obviously abusive programs that redistribute wealth to women? It is simple. Government policy and laws take the money from men and put it into womens hands because the women are more likely to spend it like it's water on frivolous shit. People can hate on this comment but the evidence is there. It isn't all women and yes men are like this more and mo…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:09 PM
1

Agreed. We have established a cultural mentality of zero accountability across the board. It is effecting both sexes and all economic levels. But none more so that women, only because they are given the most latitude and freedom from outside blame as well.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:04 PM
8

I'm sure they are already covered. Feminism covers all peoples needs. I usually don't even discuss this issue because I can honestly say I have no clue what it is in women's wiring that pushes them to purchase so much crap. Every time I see a $400.00 purse on the shoulder of a 17 year old grocery checker I want to punch a kitten. It is like there is brain death in presence of brand names.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:12 PM
0

As a guy who could never top 165lbs at 6 foot even, from 10th grade till he hit 35; When I was questioned as to my preferences, I always said "Coach told me once 'Never wrestle out of your weight class son' and coach was a wise man".
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:34 PM
1

Is it fathers pushing law suits after rough housing? I work in medical and let me tell you, it is the hovering soccer moms that are ape shit to sue when their son gets a scraped knee. I have seen quite a few moms launch at dad for suggesting that boys will be boys.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:07 PM
35

From the comments. When you count makeup - which a woman has to wear for work - then you see that not only do they make less, but their living expenses are significantly higher. How is this fair? God I hope this is sarcasm. So tired of hearing how vanity is something we should subsidize for equality sake.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 03:36 PM
8

So he went off about Nancy Grace. He also ripped on the media for exposing Crystal Mangum "She made us drag them through the mud, Now we will drag her through the mud." and that eye for an eye crap. So Stewart seems to be of the opinion that the false accuser should not face consequences.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 03:18 PM
4

Yea my way of saying it was abbreviated. You are aware of too many kids being diagnosed but are you aware that the majority of the diagnoses are little boys? Women can be great teachers. So can men. But one thing that a male teacher brings to the table (if nothing else) Is a better understanding of what it is to be a boy. Little boys and little girls are different. No matter how hard progressive psychologists try to claim otherwise. Little boys have needs that a female teacher just will never ge…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 03:01 PM
5

Because students, especially male students, benefit from having some males role models and instructors. Men approach educating a bit different than women usually and that diversifies and strengthens the education process. Oh and male teachers are less likely to have little boys sent for a psych evaluation for being energetic.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 01:21 PM
1

Of course. But that is where damning the others comes in. Perhaps the word damning comes off strong. But societal disdain for bad behavior seems all but abandoned entirely. And it is entirely abandoned for women already.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 09:38 PM
1

Agree to disagree. To support my side though I will say that the time frame from when we started over-protecting peoples feelings and vilifying criticism ties right in with the ever growing trend of entitlement and lack of personal accountability in society. Even in the animal kingdom is a member of the pack or a growing cub acts like an ass they may get a bit of a swat of a nip to regulate them. Kindness is always the best option but when it fails we can't have no further options.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:44 PM
1

I'll go one step further and say we should be praising them and damning the others. Set a better standard of character in our society.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:16 PM
1

Should be obvious given context. As long as you don't automatically conflate the two.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:15 PM
1

It's easy to be both thanks to modern feminist dogma. Just set the precedent that women are somehow exceptional in what they deserve and then tell them it is their right to guilt shame and manipulate people to get everything they want. And there ya go. An immature entitled princess who bosses everyone around till she gets it her way. It is the result of spouting to all women "You can have it all!" and "Because you deserve it" without the addendums of "If you work hard enough" and "sometimes" res…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:14 PM
3

You can condense petty and vicious down to one word. Entitled.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:12 PM
1

That's the cycle. I'm on the upswing where caring is making me give more shits than in recent past.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:11 PM
1

Yea. those cases are quite rare though. They may make up to 3% of the total.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:02 PM
9

Yes their financial ability to live by themselves. As evidenced by the % receiving money from their ex, and the % receiving government money. Better way to say it is. Relatively speaking it is very recent that women have been able to financially extort both men and society legally.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:00 PM
1

How much of that "mutual agreement" comes after months of emotional and psychological abuse?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:53 PM
3

I'm going to enter fantasy land here and pretend that this is what they mean by the "Men can stop rape" posters.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:52 PM
1

What the heck does a slave expect a slave master to do when he explains--patiently--that slavery is wrong? To agree rather than strapping him to a post and whipping the devil out of his mind? The word women is where?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:02 PM
2

but I won't condone or agree with it. But mooom I promise I didn't mean to break the lamp!! Did you read Blueoak9s response. You honestly can't even help yourself with that matriarchal, disapproval dialogue. Stop thinking that men and society are some child needing your approval. It is a very egotistical and entitled way to act.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:29 PM
1

Can't do it. I lived like that for my early 20s and late teens. I eventually had to open some windows in the wall of snark to let some air in. It was good for its time though. And like I said it is needed in a subject where many people just wont listen to reason and are devoid of empathy.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:17 PM
18

Too bad this statement is false. Jodi Arias didn't do those things. Her dishonest, feminist trope using, emotional manipulator of a legal staff did. Her man hating, womens studies major, Rad fem, corrupter of the domestic violence industry, professional witness did. Jodi Arias lived as an entitled brat, murdered as an entitled psycho, and played an entitled victim to try to get off for it. She lived in the societal model of the princess who pulls wings off of flies. Our lapse in judgement as a s…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:56 AM
5

See below for your guilt and shaming.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:35 AM
3

Blue sometimes only your style can say something so clearly. I'm more soft spoken and appeals to civility, but I recognize the value of your methods in statements like this. perfectly put!
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:28 AM
3

I agree with your observation. I forgot who it was, but I once heard a commentator say "Women, If the goal is to imitate men here can't we at least imitate a gentleman?"
/r/MensRights08/05/13 10:43 PM
3

This is true. Honestly I think that there is a lot less comfort with sexuality going on in women than even those same women would have us believe. I have hear talks about the difference in sexual nature between women and men and how feminism pushes women to be "more like men" in order to be sexually liberated. And then when they do act in these ways it goes against their inner nature and causes the "slut" thoughts.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 09:02 PM
2

Yes. But not in the same way. We substitute raped in the sexually assaulted sense with robbed.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:53 PM
5

Let me be specific because I know it can get crazy. Both men and women are capable of shaming a woman for her sexual activities. Men will do so if A)the woman he is shaming has shunned his advances and he is hurt. B)the woman he is shaming cheated on him. C)The woman he is shaming is genuinely rather loose in her morals. Women will do so if A)the woman they are shaming slept with someone the shaming woman wanted herself. B)the woman she is shaming slept with someone the shaming woman deems unatt…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:17 PM
8

I wouldn't say girls get the short end of a stick that can be used to club boys to death for not catering to her whims after a mutual sexual encounter. Social stigma is an issue but not gender specific in its initiation. I know many more women ready to sling the word slut at someone than I do men.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 07:29 PM
9

Yes but it does not matter in this context whether she wanted to or not. Even if she initiated everything she still views it the same. Just like if someone initiates a drug deal and the dealer takes the cash and runs the initiator feels robbed. Society tells us that, even though women enjoy sex and pursue it, men are the sole beneficiary of sex.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:22 PM
1

If people go to the link, don't get confrontational. This is probably not deliberate on the OPs part. It is a good chance to draw attention to what societal bias does in these issues.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:37 PM
8

Replace two with She would never have consented to anything sexual if she thought they could potentially do something she didn't want them to (like break up with her) Replace three with Ergo, his having gotten to second base with her entitled her to receive from him all the attention she wanted and for her to have unilateral control of the relationship. OP did not deliver up to her expectations of him and therefore she calls it rape.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:36 PM
92

Two things; First. Feminism has effectively worn away the definition of the word rape. Applying the term to more and more interactions. And the young women of today equate anything sexual to rape in the right circumstances. Second, Media personalities have successfully convinced women (especially young women) that their sexuality is a form of currency. That they can buy whatever they want in life with their bodies. Now we are able to substitute the word Raped for Robbed and the word sex for mone…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:27 PM
4

genderless grading. Quite simple to have students assigned a number to put on their tests instead of a name.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:31 PM
1

I would say that for most men this is the case. Not all of course. But it is not even about that. A lot of this objectifications stuff is really just projected insecurities on their parts.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 01:02 PM
2

We have to be able to laugh at this stuff.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:02 PM
6

To be fair at 14 years old what doesn't come off as sensationalist. At that age breathing can be hyperbolic if the mood hits ya.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:59 PM
1

Do you find yourself needlessly confrontational with strangers often? I am sorry you feel the way you do and I hope life treats you better soon. take care now.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:55 PM
1

Don't see any point in debating. You obviously feel that sex in a relationship is like a unicorn or something. And other than people I have known whos relationship was in the shitter that just isn't the case. So go ahead and feel down about it. Worst case scenario is, me and all of my closest friends know some kinda secret.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:33 PM
8

Ohh man. Glad I could help ya out! This realization is the exact reason why I am the quintessential worthless shlub of a man. Hell I wont so much as look at the lawnmower without her letting me grope her first.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 04:20 PM
6

No. He lied. Women have no sex drive. They only ever have sex in order to get some small portion of all of the goodies men hoard to themselves in their patriarchy vault. If women were not held down by men socially they would never have sex. The reason that it sometimes seems that womens sex drive gets stronger with age is that their patience wears thin waiting for us to be fair to them.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:47 PM
1

It's a nice box. I would keep it for later if I were you.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:40 PM
2

Ohh I know. It is just fun to satirize rad fems.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:26 PM
1

Honestly. I think you may have had a bad relationship. You seem a bit over zealous on this.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 03:25 PM
-1

Huh?! Uhh Huh! %$%<sup>
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:37 PM
9

Whoah ho ho hoooo now. Don't go pretending that there is a large percentage of the population out there that is both mentally stable And heterosexual. God knows women never want sex from a filthy man. Check your little blue privilege!
/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:25 PM
0

Just for the record you asked me about my relationships correct? That is what I have answered. As to other relationships. I got 6 good friends close enough we talk about this stuff. Not a one has a problem here. It may be a prevalent problem, but so is marrying the wrong person and or dating someone you are not really compatible with. Also the biggest problem for relationships is communication which I already mentioned is a pretty key ingredient in not going stale.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 01:04 PM
5

Meh. What do I know. Closest thing I know about trolling is getting accused of it occasionally when I say something someone doesn't like.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 01:16 AM
31

That may be true. However they essentially rewrote the article. They used a plugin like that to format the article to the web page layout. And they knew and utilized the Gawker ban to their interest. That was at least a few hours of work. All to be an internet troll. I will never look at the slacker trolls the same.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:22 PM
72

Have to admit that is some dedicated trolling. They put a lot of work into that.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:28 PM
4

This stuff just goes too far. If people were to judge my life outside of school by my drawings in 3rd grade they would conclude; 1)He owns a large rifle and often shoots down airplanes and pterodactyls. (truth. I had seen the movie Rambo and it was f'in RAD and pterodactyls) 2) He has spent at least some time engaged in the act of piracy (the keelhauling and booty kind, not the mp3 kind) (truth. I had seen the movie goonies and loved it) 3) He frequently has sex with disproportionately large bre…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 08:25 PM
1

I found that article refreshingly honest. F'ing disgusting, but honest.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 07:57 PM
1

You mistake what I am basing on. He may have asked for support if he even got custody. If you read her statements she said she ran because she was afraid she would get custody and couldn't handle being a single mom. So if he had gotten custody he may have asked for support. I base what I said on the fact that he has not even mentioned anything about support or personal hardship or anything else. So there was no order for support he hasn't asked for anything now that she has surfaced. That's all.…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 07:45 PM
6

The defenses job is to use evidence to show innocence. Not really to assassinate the character of the victim. We don't allow that to happen in a rape trial do we? Having professional witnesses like LaViolette testifying in a case like this is equivalent to having a pimp be a defense witness at a rape case.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:53 PM
-1

Yes. Was in one from age 18-24. a second one from 25-28. and have been in one now since 29 for 6+ years. So I suppose that is a Yes. Never cheat, never go without. Respect, communication, and picking someone for the right reasons tends to work out well.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:42 PM
0

pretty general way to say something and quite broad but it would seem so on the surface.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 12:22 AM
-1

well it is not. Having a long term partner makes sex life something that is, not something you must pursue.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 12:21 AM
2

I disagree. The punitive nature of the courts is corrupt. Since the court themselves skim a portion of support money in the transaction, and they overrule women who refuse child support payment, there is an obvious self interested miscarriage of justice being done. Men are suffering from this corruption now. If men turn around and utilize this corrupt system it makes it impossible to ever make it end. No one will have the higher moral ground from which to demand that change. The injustice to men…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:50 PM
1

No model can fit perfectly. And none ever will. Aside from having all sex recorded for legal reasons there will never be a perfect solution.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:35 PM
-1

Getting laid is not a problem faced much in relationships.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:33 PM
1

You have a mix of things there that are either pertinent or not. Having an STD. I would say yes. In fact there have been people tried for manslaughter for deliberately withholding from sexual partners that hey had AIDS. And many STDs are more than just a nuisance but can actually kill. Yes disclosure of that information is pertinent. Birth sex. This one is trickier but I think also yes it should be disclosed. If, as a society we are to respect the sexual nature of a transsexual and their persona…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 08:36 AM
1

I just see that as punitive and spiteful. If the kids are attending school maybe. But even then this woman has no means of paying. I don't think it is right for society to lock up men who quite simply cannot pay. Having that stance means that I cannot think that locking a woman up when she cannot pay is ok. I won't fall into Hippocracy for the sake of spite and social justice. If I did i would be no better than the feminists. That is just how I see it. But believe me i feel the injustice of it.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:39 AM
3

Of course they can. And I am glad to see cases like this come to light. But As I said in another comment I don't want to see this all become about ensuring that women get the same mistreatment as men do. I'm so sorry you have gone through this. And yes it is quite unfair that the courts do not expend equal effort to find a deadbeat mom. The loop hole is this. A man typically has fewer choices in their survival. Get a job to earn, Live with family, or become homeless. Only the homeless option wor…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:22 AM
7

Take a look at positions of power, and across the board you will see men (especially white men) in the overwhelming majority of positions. This is quintessential apex fallacy. And you prove it empirically with you bracketed addition. Especially white men. Well this proves that you are perceiving the world through a narrow lens. You see the world dominated by white men. Well by the numbers this cannot be true because white men do not outnumber the combined total of asian, black, middle eastern, i…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 06:42 AM
2

I’m not saying that it is rape every single time anyone has sex without explicit consent. The discussion here as I understand it is No means no being replaced by Anything but an enthusiastic yes means no. Not anything but an enthusiastic yes means no sometimes Vaguery in regards to legal matters are never a very good idea
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:44 AM
0

Being a shit? I have had times where I was tired after work and was not in the mood and the lady I was dating made the sad pouty face at me and got some. She emotionally manipulated me. It wasn't rape.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:32 AM
0

If people couldnt gamble away their savings while drunk I know one town in Nevada thats is about to see a drastic uptick in the population of tumbleweeds.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:30 AM
0

The story plainly says that a divorce was in process. Thus he was finished with the relationship to her. That wasn't extrapolation. every article I have read on this says plainly that they were getting divorced. Bot he and she have said as much. She was afraid that she would get the kids and would not be able to handle single motherhood so she split. His kids are 20. They don't need support from a woman who has been homeless and drifting for years. I don't believe that men thinking in this punit…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:18 AM
2

likely yes. Just saying to add more to the idea. Yes urinate between sessions. As most ladies like to do this as well it should not be a problem. Just wait your turn.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 05:00 AM
10

I knew a girl once who pointed out a source that said condoms don't interfere with sensitivity. I pointed out to her the sales numbers for female condoms.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:56 AM
6

Urinating does more than clear them out. Urine actually kills sperm due to its PH. This is why men have a prostate gland which keeps the two separate. So even the trace cells that may not be cleared by urinating will be killed by the urine.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:54 AM
2

I can see both sides of this. But we have to remember that movies are movies. Our brains understand that what we are watching is fantasy not an actual event. If we were talking about a man being turned on watching some CCTV footage from a parking garage of an actual rape then yes it is disturbing. But we are, at this point in society, so saturated by media that psychologists note desensitization to real events due to over exposure through media. Not the other way around. We are seeing life as mo…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:35 AM
1

I believe the idea is: when a man looks at a womans body, particularly sexualized parts of her body, he equates the entirety of her being to those parts. He makes her an object by dismissing her personality and person. He is only appreciating her for the value he places on those particular parts of her body. This of course is idiotic because a man cannot know the person or personality of every woman he sees in life who is physically attractive to him. In fact thanks to feminism many men dare not…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 04:22 AM
0

As they should. I'm sure Oprah is dying to get them on the show. Plea moms case to them and get the teary eyed reunion. We shall see.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:12 AM
2

There has been no statement that he cares at all about money. A divorce was in the works when she left. It had not reached that phase but he obviously was through with her. And from his statements he would be happy enough if she had never surfaced at all.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 02:51 AM
-1

Well in this case he did not try. The children (grown now) don't even care. They grew up with a good dad in the absence of an obviously toxic mom. It may as well have been that she had died. In cases like this thats better. Any involvement by that mom would be nothing but chaos and hurt.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:19 AM
1

A bit more rough way to describe it. But your honesty is refreshing.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:17 AM
1

I apologise my patriarchal penis typed that while my man gaze was savaging someone.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:16 AM
-2

From what I read he never tried. Never cared to. He was just happy to raise his children in the absence of a toxic mother.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 12:09 AM
-2

We are? I suppose this means I should cancel my appontment to have my self sharpened and polished, as I am not just a tool. You just saved me 20 bux.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:44 PM
204

The father did not file for child support. He got custody and was fine with that. We need to recognize that men and women are often different in these issues. The marriage ended he got the kids. Thats all he wanted. He wasnt like all of these women who demand a check to support the kids they demanded. He got them and was self sufficient enough to say "just get lost".
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:40 PM
1

You think so? A huge problem huh? two posts per week out of hundreds? Huge problem? Yea for you because the sentiment within the MRM conflicts with your desires to let the victim culture state remain. You like that the message is Victims are entirely without agency to mitigate risk. It makes guilt go magically poof. Eliminating that nasty need to confront ones own behaviors and change. Personal accountability is scarey stuff.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:08 PM
3

I would be annoyed by this. However the second picture in the section about how men are seen as dominant and powerful (the one following the marlboro man) HAHA I know that guy. used to hang out with him when he lived in NY. He was all of 130lbs at 6feet tall. Great guy, quiet unasuming and well mannered. He, even in a picture could not be considdered Dominant and powerful. He would laugh his ass off at that. Me thinks the creator of the film considders any image of a man that gives her panties a…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 08:04 PM
1

twice a week someone discusses an issue which effects men on an MRM dedicated subreddit. Yea I see the big problem there. You focus in on it because you have an issue in regards to the matter. It is far frome pervasive let allone absorbing the movement. This is a Sigil problem not an MRM problem. Go ahead and put your focus where you feel it should be. You can let one or two submissions a week get by without your stilted imput can't you?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 07:41 PM
1

And if the only thing ever discussed within the MRM was that you would have a point. That is far from the truthe so what you are doing ammounts to nothing but protecting your own self interests. It is only one of many many topics discussed within the movement and if you made an effort you could busy yourself with all of that other material and never deal with this issue at all. You deliberately zero in on it because you want the status quot of the victim mentality withing crisis to remain intact…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 06:18 PM
1

Continuing your asertion of what we are and are not is exactly what dictating means Sigil. Don't like the topic? Butt out. That is all. It is not for you to say we are X we are not Y. You are not as important as you seem to think you are. Get over yourself and let people discuss what they choose to discuss without your incessant self agrandized lecturing. This is not Sigils private MRM.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 06:12 PM
1

You jump on every chance you get to tell posters on here that commenting on this issue is a big no-no. Every time. You jump in to asert your preference over them. That is not your place and it is absolutely a sign that you think you should dictate what MRA do and do not discuss. Stop doing that. Simple. Stop trying to control the discource of other members because you have a personal issue. You don't jump in on any other issue like you do this one. You are not advising of a better way or informi…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:37 PM
1

Ok listen, you are not the MRM president so simply stop pretending. You are not the MLK of mens rights so just go do what you do. Focus on what you feel need focused on and let others decide for themselves. Stop trying to play all wise mommy to a diverse movement. I think that getting some younger socially concious men interested in entering the field of psychology, crisis management, DV advocacy is a good thing. The existing structures will not change. They cannot be simply demolished. They mus…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:16 PM
4

Most likely a PR stunt anyway. Ravenous white girl fan jumping on stage and blowing him feeds his image and fan base well.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:11 PM
1

No we don't we offer a differing solution to the issue which shows the flaws and damage that their narrative creates. You honestly thing it is just a matter of tearing down the broken. No one cares about replacing something broken with nothing. That is idiotic. The solution is to show that there are better ways to deal with all of the issues than to adopt misandric feminist policies. You HAVE to have an alternative to offer.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:08 PM
1

We discuss it amoungst ourselves. There are no news stories covering our discussions.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:03 PM
1

All of which are corrupted feminist bodies. I don't jump in on others discussions to force my own views and objectives. You do that. I simply jump in to tell you to knock it off. You seem to think that simply demolishing the existing, flawed structure is enough. That is the mistake of many movements. You cannot simply point to the derelict, rat infested building and gas up the bulldozers. You have to show up with architectural plans for a new and better building. The community sees little benefi…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 05:02 PM
5

Yea she is a perfect example of the worst kind of selfish misandric feminist entitlement princess. And it is disgusting that she has a platform to spout her garbage. More disgusting to me are the cheers and ratings her show gets from the masses. When people cheer her antics over a mutilated man, I am less enraged by her than I am by the audience reaction.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 04:14 PM
1

Every march is publicised in the news. Every one. So it is being taken seriously enough.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:57 PM
1

Again. Who are you to say "it has nothing to do with us" You are not the impromptu leader of a diverse equality movement. Stop pretending to be. If MRM engages in a debate you feel no need to enjoin then stay out of it. I stay out of the Circumcision debate. It is not your place to try to shout down or silence the opinionsand concerns of other people within the movement. The only reason you do not get this is because you have your own visceral, emotional baggabe which makes you agree with the fe…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:57 PM
1

It has to do with ripping a misandric ideology out of an important social service industry where it harms everyone especially men. So yes it has to do with us. Because noone else is even challenging them.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:26 PM
1

Well it is obviously supported enough to take place. It is also taken seriously enough to get media coverage. So it is a message that is being sent out to the masses. Therefore it has power. Ignoring it because you think it is silly? Again you appear to think that your take on an issue is right and true and the only one of value. If society puts enough stock in it to pay attention to it then it has enough pull to require refutation. Also this is not about slutwalk. Slutwalk is merely a symptom o…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:24 PM
8

Yep. She is the perfect example of the elite upper class white woman and her empowerment. Take the single most pampered and catered to demografic, add victim status, and watch the spoild child burn the house down in a tantrum.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:37 PM
1

I have adressed this. Ignoring ones agency in regards to risk behavior creates the narrative that victims are powerless. Powerlessness leads to further victimhood. Taking the self blame and shame and redirecting them to rational self improovment empowers victims to understand that they are not simply walking targets in a world of predators. We have utilized the feminist narrative for the last 20-30 years in regards to sex based crime and the result is rape hysteria and kids locked behind doors i…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:34 PM
1

You say slutwalk and anti victimblaming are about all victims? Where have I heard similar to that before? Ohh yea "patriarchy hurts men too!" oh yea and the coopting of all equality movements by feminism. Which invariably steers toward benefitting only women. Sorry that card has been played time and again and many of us recognise it as the joker. Show me one person in a slut walk with a poster about child victims of rape....one about male rape victims... Show me where the message is "victim blam…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:29 PM
1

The motivations and goals of Feminism? Which ones? the pretty ones they claim or the destructive ones they do? The message of equality? Or the collectivist separation of class by sex? And you did engage them with stats. You posted stats and studies to them and you were ignored.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:11 PM
1

I should know that my expirience is not the same as theirs and therefore I should bow to their feelings and be content with the rape culture message they promote? No thanks. You have been indoctrinated to the feminist narrative on this issue because your personal emotional reaction makes their narrative more comforting to you. Avoidance of emotionally difficult messages is nothing more that denyal. Except in this case where allowing that denyal shifts all burden onto the "Other". Feminism is all…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:39 PM
7

Jeffery Dahmer felt an irresistible impulse to sexually murder people. Poor guy. /S
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:32 PM
3

He split with her a couple months ago. May not last but heres hoping. Ozzy is a hero to lots of people. But he has always been a bit of a whipping boy to Sharon. He stuck with her after she dropped the bomb that she had been fucking Randy Rodes behind his back, on live tv. He should have been out right there but he is fried. Hope he gets something sweet on the current tour and cuts the hag loose.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:30 PM
3

Understandable. But is a person a rapist just because someone says they are? There was no evidence to substatiate her claim. He was never charged nor convicted of rape. So he is not a rapist. So what defending her action ammounts to is; its ok to mutilate someone as long as YOU SAY they raped you.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:25 PM
3

Counceling provided by the feminist flooded psychiatric community. Yep that will set her straight.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:20 PM
1

You are thinking of the wrong statistics. And the statistics on divorce in traditionalist parts of the country are a tough call. Often the young in traditionalist famillies will mary for the wrong reasons, without being at all ready for such a commitment. They end up divorced. They don't even know eachother or have any type of foundation to stand on. It isn't the traditionalism that kills the marriage it is the lack of maturity. Lack of maturity is a plague in this country that effects people ev…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:15 PM
1

If the narrative is destroyed in a click, why don't you click and fix it all?
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:12 PM
1

That is where you are wrong here. You believe that the approach is best to be to show stats and such to show how the narrative is flawed on the side of the premises and practices. That is good and should be done. However it is of equal importance to show how the narrative and ideology create negative results in what they claim to fix. It is important to show the biases in the DV statistics and the allocation of custody of children and say that it is evidence that men do not get the help they nee…
/r/MensRights04/05/13 01:54 AM
1

The statistics on crime, mental health, physical health, and social success indicate otherwise. We as MRAs use the statistics showing the benefit to children by having BOTH mother and father in their lives as evidence of the negative impact of treating fathers as disposable. Those statistics also support traditionalism at least in its loose sense. It does not need to be in traditional rolls but it has benefits. The studies show this.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 11:30 PM
1

I am sorry for arguing so much against you. You have an emotional and visceral response to what you perceive as a cruel criticism. That is natural and the largest obstacle to what I believe in. Some are entirely incapable of surmounting that fear of being held accountable for something that robbed them of their autoimmunity. It is a very deep situation that requires patience and understanding. Once a person is beyond the point of blame assignment and doubt. they can then move on to what if any u…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:58 PM
1

I have talked to victims. Explained my rational to them and each one has thanked me once they get it. Once they actually let go of the self blame for the others action and apply the self blame to the lesser issue of poor decision or recklessness they find it quite freeing. You see making a mistake is human and therefore easily forgivable. Once they accept their humanness they forgive themselves and assign blame solely on the perpetrator. Emotional reaction and critical analysis are natural respo…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:26 PM
1

That is very sexist of you Sigil. Even as a man I have had to live with societal misconceptions. I have heard all of the arguments saying "must have wanted it" and "I should be so lucky as to get rapped by a girl" as well as all of the side you have heard. I however have gotten beyond equating the end result with the preceding actions. The woman who raped me is solely responsible for the act of rape upon me. I hold no self blame for that action as it was not my own. I was responsible for my stat…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:21 PM
1

Well quite honestly if they are so saturated by good advice and still fail to listen at all that equates to their having an inability to get their mind right.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:41 PM
1

So I don't seem to get that you are governed by emotional baggage of your own which is swaying your rationality in this debate? I am sorry for that emotional trouble and I empathize however your emotional response does not negate the validity of my argument. I'm sorry. Arguing from emotion is one of the key ingredients for all of the misandric shit we have to deal with in the modern climate.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:40 PM
1

Again with the pants. You are pathetic Sigil. Hope you realize that. You just keep arguing against points I never said. Fight that ghost of your own creation ya nut job. If I had not gotten wasted to the point on unconsciousness. NO I wouldn't have. that is a correct assessment. As it is true that If I were sober and conscious I would have been able to quite easily avoid what happened. Try again with your weak fake argument.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:27 PM
1

Amanda Marcotte is responsible for getting more people raped. From "rape culture" mythology, to portraying safety tips as victim-blaming, she is responsible for spreading disinformation that will lead to sexual assault. This was the post this started about. It was at this point that you decided to throw out your spiel. I called you on how typical feminist it is and how you have no right to tell people here how to think or what to post. You got into the whole deal again trying to defend your stan…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:12 PM
1

And you are the one who made this about slutwalk. The discussion was about what level of personal responsibility one bears in the eventuality that they are victimized. Go ahead back to the topic. Was it slutwalk? Nope. Not this time nor the time before when I debated you on this. You mention children creating a totally separate scenario in attempt to discredit what I have said. You mention wardrobe in attempt to say I am implying something I am not. You are attempting to change what I say into s…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:07 PM
1

You are such a feminist Sigil. Never said pants keep digging for what was never said you look more the fool by the second. As for the drinking yes My drinking far beyond a reasonable amount, to the point of unconsciousness elevated my risk and eliminated my ability to prevent what happened. That was a bad move on my part. If I had been mauled by a bear in my drunken coma the same would hold true.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:00 PM
1

No I don't have to support an incorrect statement because my statement is towards the same goal. That is like saying that If person A says hanging by your ankles will make you taller and I say a healthy diet will make you taller that I support the idea that hanging from ones ankles will make you taller. That's fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:57 PM
1

Did I mention pants you devious misrepresenting fool? I was very specific as to where I was culpable and none of it had to do with pants selection or anything else that has zero bearing on my being in a position of elevated risk and vulnerability. Your insistence on inserting your terms into my statement is pathetic. You are arguing against something I never said.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:55 PM
1

That is a real strong false equivalence you are demanding isn't it. That works for you? A child on par with adults? Who is removing personal accountability of adults and agency here? And you throw in the skirt thing again where I have said nothing of clothing at all. You do this to detract from what is rational by tying it to the irrational. But why not it has worked for the feminists for years. And on this issue Sigil you may as well be one.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:50 PM
1

Because we are discussing feminism ya daft jackass.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:39 PM
1

You still fucking fail. It is not to say they were raped because they did X but to say doing X greatly increases the chances so maybe try to avoid doing X. There is a gulf of difference to anyone who understands personal accountability.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:39 PM
1

You also seem to be implying that I feel the precautions do not apply equally to all adults regardless of gender. Well here you go. When I was 14 I got wasted at a party and, feeling sick, wandered away from the party into an empty park to sleep it off. While I was unconscious A female removed my pants, orally stimulated me and then raped me by envelopment. At no time in this was I consenting or even conscious. I learned of the details from a third party who witnessed it all. All I knew was at o…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:34 PM
1

And only Sigil knows the way toward the light. Guide us wise Sigil.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:16 PM
1

Kids? well they are not adults and their situation is often quite different. The rape of children is far more frequently a predatory act. Men. Excessive drinking, use of narcotics, etc can greatly increase the possibility of being victimized. If a man drinks himself into a stupor and is raped, he is not responsible for the rape but he is responsible for the drinking which elevated his risk. Therefore advising that drinking oneself into a stupor in mixed company especially with unknown people or …
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:15 PM
1

I am saying exactly what you are only without the biased slant that the victim woman can do no wrong.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:39 PM
1

I say apple you say apple. Then you tell me my apple is wrong because I choose to bite it from a different angle.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:26 PM
1

Exactly. It is not about anything they do or do not do it is all on the notorious other. And the other better shut up about it.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:54 PM
1

And here we come back to the fact that you think that you know what's what and everyone else is wrong. It is cyclical and moronic. You have a differing opinion on an issue fine. But stop telling others what to think or say on the matter. This is not your soap box.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:38 PM
1

They are trying to get what you call "tipstering and armchair experts" out because those people actually call for some degree of female accountability for their behavior. That is why. They want to establish and maintain the narrative that the woman holds zero responsibility at all. And you swallow that turd like it is strawberry icecream.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:18 PM
1

See you sound dumb now. Slut walk is about people not putting any of the blame for a resultant problem on risk factors which elevate that problems likelihood. That is exactly what I am saying it is. Womens behavior can not be held even in part to blame for results which are provably elevated by that behavior. You are Wrong again.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 06:11 PM
1

That doesn't seem to be the case with all of this Slut walk stuff. They put out the message that it is all on those filthy men and women can and should behave in anyway they wish to with no regard for repercussions. It is mens and societies job to watch over them. Regardless of our disagreement here. It still comes down to you thinking that you have the right to dictate to people here what they should do. Aside from spurning trolls and idiots who make threats and blatant woman hate, MR is not ab…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:49 PM
1

Taking the full responsibility of rape off of mens shoulder is part of MRM. And since it is that feminist narrative which creates that ideal it follows that showing the flaw in their narrative is in our interests. What many MRAs want is equality of agency and equality of responsibility. What you seem to want is Equality at the victimhood table.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:27 PM
1

And that is fine. This isn't your personal soap box sigil so get down from there. No one said that there is an epidemic. They just said that observable behavior patterns can greatly increase potential rape and that saying so or pointing those behaviors out is normal and fine. Not doing so is acquiescing to the feminist narrative that women are not to blame for anything. Even their own bad choices. Allowing that narrative to be accepted is antithema to equality.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:22 PM
1

Whatever. Has nothing to do with men stopping rape. Has to do with society being free to find fault in women as well as men. And in women taking rational precautions in their own behaviors rather than putting the onus of their safety onto men and society. Let me know when the MR sub becomes Sigilsarmy.com and I will be on my way. Until then you don't call the shots nor should you feel the right to dictate to others what is and is not right.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:12 PM
1

No I don't. The end result of rape prevention advice is for women to make safer decisions for themselves not for men to make those decisions for them. Wanting women to be safe does not have to equal protecting them. They protect themselves. You still fail to see the difference between white knighting and expecting women to be accountable for their own poor choices. And commenting on those choices.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:04 PM
1

That's not true. Statistics show that an intact nuclear family of mother father children is the most stable and successful model. Whether that plays out as father working mom at home or mother working father at home or both parents working and caring for the kids doesn't matter. I don't personally see it as placing a low value on my life to work and provide for my children and wife. They are what I value most. So my labor is rewarded by their good health and prosperity. It becomes an issue to me…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:42 PM
1

That's a fucking stretch but from you I'm not surprised. Seriously? rape hysteria? Slut shaming? quit digging. I am simply saying that taking upon oneself a responsible adult attitude and behaviors is equality. Not everyone gets to be equal victim.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:36 PM
1

This is true. And while I would much rather see men not have to endure the more harsh aspects of the traditional male gender role, at least with the traditionalist women there is an exchange. Where as the feminists want to have freedom to choose while simultaneously holding men to roles they are harmed by. One is a selfish hypocrite the other is willing to make a trade.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:23 PM
1

Yes but the traditionalist "women and children first) ones don't typically self identify as feminist or push the popular feminist agendas. At least not until they want their divorce.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:06 PM
3

Nothing disingenuous about expecting women to behave like responsible adults rather than putting the burden of their protection and safety onto men and society as a whole. What is disingenuous is being an MRA that condones and supports the mentality that a womans actions and decisions play no role in the eventual outcomes in their life.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 02:07 PM
3

Don't listen to Sigil. They have a real hang up on the Feminist created victim blaming hook. And Sigil, if you are still so adamant that MRA should never comment on this issue why do you insist on doing so every single time?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:33 AM
10

I live in the part of NY the Brawley case took place in. Yea she had her boyfriend fuck her brutally, beat her, cover her in shit, and drop her off in the woods. She then walked into a convenience store screaming rape and people called the cops. She then flat out stated that the men who were accused had raped tortured and humiliated her. Yea the cops responding to a beaten, shit covered, young woman crying rape was overzealous. And the whole time all Tawana had said was "i had a bad day". /S Ms.…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:25 AM
5

There is an inverse relationship between the age of women declaring themselves feminist and the ages of sexual desirability. Go figure. As a fine comedian once said "Women are assholes. we just don't say anything because we want to fuck em'"
/r/MensRights03/05/13 12:13 AM
5

White cis gendered males; The only group not allowed personal pride.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:08 PM
3

Yea was long after her and I had gone our separate ways. We still crossed paths from time to time and one time she told me how they "ladies at work would look at her son like a future rapist" and it made her do a 180.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:55 PM
2

Tell me about it. Worst part is that over time their sick ideology and hate oozed into that girl I was dating. She has since turned back around but it was something to see. It was like she joined a cult.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:37 PM
2

“You are trying to make the pain go away by saying this is not part of me,” he said. “But what we need to learn is that this happened. I did it. There were many circumstantial things, but I did it.”; This quote right here sums up how this has happened. As well as the motivation to change the numbers. Western culture progresses further and further into the mentality of entitlement and less accountability. This is the inevitable result.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:43 PM
1

We have been putting together a memory book with all of those letters included. Sadly my mother has also made negative comments about him since he passed. I have to ignore these or I will loose her as well.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:30 PM
1

Room mate. friend. Anyone close who the suspect themselves wishes to contact. We are not talking violate the accused rights. They can contact whoever they want to let them know as much as they choose about the situation.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:18 PM
1

I have been shocked since he died. My mother has gotten dozens and dozens of letters from people none of us knew saying essentially that they owe their success in life to my father. It is amazing. We are trying to write back to all of them personally but there have been so many.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 07:16 PM
1

Thanks man. It's ok now. I'll miss him but he made me all that I am today. So essentially every success I have and every happy day, he is with me in the form of his influence on who I am.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:54 PM
1

Who fixes the robots? Programs them? Dusts up the work spaces so the robots don't get fail? As long as humans exist humans will have to work.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:06 PM
6

"I wish I didn't discriminate against all those boys and men." "Because they reacted to my attitude by making me do all this damn work" "I should have been nicer in my using them...more flies with honey and all that" -Dying Feminists FTFY
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:00 PM
2

Two months ago I lost my father. He was 66 years old. He retired from full time work, he started at age 17, one year ago. His work day started at 5am when he left on his commute and he got home at 7pm every night. He died exactly three days after having completed the task of moving my mother and himself into a seniors complex condominium. All I could think when I got the news was "god damn it he never got to rest" The only consolation I can feel looking at his story is that he spent what little …
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:56 PM
0

This is just a scare tactic. There is a difference between secret trials and media access to all information. If we agree that the accused remain anonymous that does not imply that the accused family etc. would not be made aware of their situation. Just the media and social justice groups.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:48 PM
6

That train of thought is widespread in both DV and rape crisis intervention industries. Both are flooded with phych/womens studies grads who pervert everything they touch. I have known many in that field, few of which would piss on a man to put a fire out. I dated a woman who wanted to work in the field. She graduated and took her first job at a center for sex assault. Within days she was coming home with stories of what the other staff said at work, we even had a party and invited her new cowor…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:15 PM
4

History and reality show us that moderate/middle ground never makes changes. Moderates are by nature amiable and amenable and thus speak out infrequently. This is a flaw that has effected culture and politics for centuries. We need MRA to pull the rope back even against feminism. The center will not do it.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:04 PM
6

Exactly! [Woman engages in textbook "grooming" practices, with multiple under age victims, on multiple occasions, over a long period of time] Mistake. Man does the same...serial rapist pedophile with potential to go all John Wayne Gacy at any moment.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:24 PM
1

Thanks. It is something I feel strongly about. I feel that the Feminist movement cast aside some of the truly wonderful aspects of the Female to the greater loss of society. I would hate to see the MRM do the same with men.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:36 PM
2

My objection is the questionability of the poster. Yes one can be feminist and MRA. One can not however be Female as implied by "I have never done this" in response to something female feminists do. and then in the other response saying "I'M male and MRA" And the implication did say feminist but given context and notable events such as the one being discussed in this very thread Female is also implied. The statement "I have never done this" made by a male in this thread would elicit either a DUH…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:34 PM
1

Yea. I get it. See my response above. But lets not make the mistake here. It is not mens better nature we have to fight but the nature of others to exploit that better nature.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:22 PM
1

I see that POV and anticipated it. However I don't see mens natural instinct to be self sacrificing and protective as the problem. Rather it is the willingness of others to exploit this nature that is wrong. It is like sexual abuse of children in a way. Someone with malicious and selfish intent using someone else in a destructive manner. I still think men should be praised for selflessness. We need more of that not less.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:21 PM
1

The excuse given by those hate groups were "they are less than human". I'm not making it up. People can be deliberately blind to truth. Creationists can be deliberately ignorant towards evolution. And extreme atheists can be deliberately ignorant to the fact that the evil Christians once made up the entirety of social welfare programs in the west. Bigoted, and indoctrinated people see what they want to see. Deliberate ignorance. Fact can be denied by those with a will to do so.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 06:01 PM
4

In this comment. Not a day goes by where false accusations aren't being made by feminists. I have never done this, please stop saying that I do. Two lines away. You realize I'm a man as well and an MRA right? So you are a female feminist male MRA. Or are you an mid stage transgender egalitarian with schizophrenia?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:50 PM
10

(Crickets chirping)
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:45 PM
2

That's not atheism. That's anti-theism. It is the childish rantings of people who "don't believe in god" because they are mad that the world isn't fair. It is the philosophical equivalent to a six year old saying "your not my daddy!" because they didn't get what they wanted for Christmas.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:42 PM
40

Femlogic 101: It is not that she is the victim of a rape threat, but that she is the victim of the patriarchy. As are all women. So therefore blaming women for anything at any time no matter the nature, and severity of the offence is victim blaming. Woman murders 4 children in the bath tub---post partum victim--- cannot be blamed. Woman kills ex boyfriend---abuse victim---cannot be blamed. Woman earns 32k per year as a secretary and takes an average of 1-2 days off per month for personal reasons…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:32 PM
1

They can. Racist in the 50s were educated enough to know black people were human beings, same goes for Nazis and Jews. The people deliberately ignore fact and the obvious to maintain their preferred reality. Thus deliberately ignorant.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:28 PM
1

Self respect? Personal accountability? Dignity? It isn't about hemlines and alcohol. It is about passed out in a pool of your own sick legs propped up in a short skirt with no panties on. Big difference. You want black and white on this because it serves to make for extremists. Well to bad we have gray scale. Want to go out and drink a few? go ahead. Want to wear a deep V neck and a mini? ok. But moderation and knowing limits is good. Wear the mini, but if tieing your shoes means a free gynecolo…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:25 PM
1

No you are not trying to find out what I am saying. Because I have told you what I am saying repeatedly. I have said flatly NO I am not saying that. To which you eventually return to are you saying this? It has to be deliberate or just stupid. And to an extent yes. Maintaining some social standards is perfectly acceptable. Murder being a bad thing is a social standard, should we ditch that in the name of "progress"? That is the problem with the extreme left. They want so much "freedom" from soci…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:08 PM
1

Yea it may be derogatory to some eyes to say thick skull. But to those with thick skin it is just a term to say either deliberately ignorant or stubborn.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:03 PM
1

Text is a bad format. Not once have I been angry. Adamant, and passionate, Yes. But not angry. Forceful language is some times the only way into a thick skull.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:38 PM
1

You keep digging to imply that I think "shaming women for being raped" when there is a big difference between that and Pointing out to young women that chasing around with strange men while trashed shitless and half naked is a bad fucking idea. You frame my words into your twisted interpretation to achieve one thing. No accountability for women who behave in reckless manners. And you say I follow the lines of Patriachy and rape culture. No. There is a difference between patriarch (world ruled by…
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:37 PM
1

Well then. You have seen no negligible changes in social standards I guess. I have. Is it feminism leading women to throw caution to the wind? Not entirely no, popular culture carries most of that burden. And as for my posts shaming men. While that is obviously an attempt to indicate doublle standards on my part, I'll answer. There are none on reddit as I don't frequent the dozen plus subs dedicated to villifying men constantly. Society is already doing plenty of man shaming. On my part. Yes if …
/r/MensRights28/04/13 11:10 PM
1

Yes but you can't talk to them forever.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:32 PM
1

There was a big article on it here on MR within the last month. Reading that article is like reading a code book for SRS and Tumbler. lol
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:32 PM
1

Yes your points are correct. We are talking mitigation of risk not elimination. And all of those factors I mentioned absolutely mitigate risk. As to the false accusation deal. Men are not blamed for a false accusation they just face many of the same repercussions as they would if the accusation wasn't false.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:31 PM
1

See it as you will. The same goes for the men at risk. I'm just as likely to tell a young man to steer clear of the bi-polar chick as to tell a young woman it's best to avoid the school smack dealer. We were talking about women here so thats what I adressed so you have some confirmation bias going.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:27 PM
1

Yea. I just thought that the guys here could use a pick up. The cultural dialogue is so anti-male 24/7 these days. We need to know that it is bias. That men are still out there, every day, being Fathers, brothers, coworkers, and heros. We should be proud to be men not ashamed.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:24 PM
2

I made a joke get over it and yourself. But yes there are and have been deliberately made pages on wiki that bash men. If there are some that bash women as well that is a problem. I haven't seen those so cannot say they exist.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:55 AM
2

If evidence is given yes. When the wiki page for domestic violence gives the definition as "violence against women" yes this is bias against men. It is not biased against women. I have seen many many pages from wiki which show a bias against men. Wiki as a whole? no it is an online encyclopedia. Facts are not biased. But when certain pages are manipulated to be biased thats a problem and some feminists are doing just that.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:41 AM
1

I do get it. They are not demonstrating it. That is all. If women are aware of the risks and are capable of managing those risk why are they not doing so in these situations? And not blaming them for the rape but for placing them self in that situation. That isnt shaming its expecting personal accountability. And you mention GWW. Have you watched her clip discussing guilt and shame as they apply to men and women? She says quite plainly that society has lifted the constraint of shame from women a…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:06 AM
1

No. What it mean is that there is some reason this is trending as it is. And yes actual rape numbers are down 80% but not the accusations of men on campuses. Those are up. And they keep climbing. And the combination of stretching the definition of rape and the man shaming as opposed to hey stop doing that miss are the major differences on campus. If society doesn't question the disregard for personal responsibility displayed by some women in these situation yer that is wrong. just like it is wro…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:18 AM
1

No I am not. I an talking about them as adults who play the roll of child when it suits them and I make it clear that doing so is not going to fly. And fine yes they manage their own risk but don't put the fucking blame on men when your risk gets you hurt. Which is where the shaming issue enters again. If society is not allowed to let women feel like ass holes when they fuck up because that's shaming, there is no way for society to express that certain behaviors are not good. Feminism created th…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:57 AM
1

No i'm talking about them as if they are people. Neither god nor drone. They can make mistakes and if they can be warned against those mistakes that is good. Same goes for men and children. All people. If your intent is to say women as a whole already know that getting wasted and hanging on some stranger, going home with him and fooling around, etc etc can elevate your change of getting raped from zero to X% and they still do so they really need to stop playing the helpless victim. Then that bec…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:26 AM
1

That is where your buying into the feminist "blaming the victim" mentality comes in. It's not all about the victim. It is about all of the other non victims who hear it and say to themselves "she turned left and got hurt I will turn right." And to a lesser extent for those victims who go on to become perpetual victims to recognize their pattern and adjust it. It again is about societal perception. If the perception stands as she can do no wrong and bad things just happen to her you loose that me…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:58 AM
1

Not quite. Only children take constructive reasoning an yell "stop treating me like a child" Women like that need to grow out of their angsty teens and become adults. Allowing them to simply throw a tantrum when someone points out an obviously bone head thing to do is moronic. Adult women agency is taking responsibility for their own actions. Including those action which put them alone in a strange place with a strange man intoxicated beyond self control. What the man does to her there is on him…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:50 AM
1

Them getting bent about the fact that you can't teach a rapist not to rape is dull yes. True. but dull. All of why I am many others discussed about female agency and the laying of the entire issue on the shoulders of men is solid and reasoned counter argument to the exact purpose of the meme. So again you are wrong. Go argue it with 4chan they are the ones who have it wrong.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:28 AM
1

Seriously your wrong go away.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:10 AM
1

You are way to dense to discuss with. First I have proven that the meaning of the propaganda is not being misinterpreted at all. Second I have explained how allowing feminist theory to be disseminated without contest leads to slanted social opinions which will prevent men from gaining any headway at all. Without public backing and societal awareness we are a dead voice, So finally just move on. You are either deliberate in being so off the mark, ore you are too immature or unintelligent to actua…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:00 AM
2

That is just to get their ravenous, yet deeply lazy, drones to get up off there but and type up some misandry.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:52 PM
1

You may be doing something wrong. I know I'm gonna come because it feels like someone ripped my spine out and replaced it with an electrically charged metal rod. Then my head explodes. Just messin with ya.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:47 PM
2

It may have. What more do people need. move along nothing to see here. Just love.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:44 PM
1

They get their power by controlling the voice and having no dissenting opinions heard they steer public perception to see their side quite easily when no other side can be heard. Even AVFM have adopted counter poster campaigns etc to refute the feminist slant.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:43 PM
1

The war to win is to clearly demonstrate that there is a better way. Was MLK content to just allow himself to be forced down in public opinion? No he refuted the bigotry and pointed out how wrong it was. And especially how it made the bigot them self lesser for being such
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:58 PM
1

The law caters to the cultural attitudes. Even the judges who favor women in the courts are catering to the cultural attitudes. How do you not get that? It is a simple as "He who controls the thoughts of others controls their actions as well" or more simply "move your mind and your ass will follow" You think that change can be effected by numbers. Change is brought about by reaching the minds and hearts of society then they make the change.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:57 PM
1

No. See this is where you show a feminist slant. You have or had a situation where women were basically blamed for being raped. Correction: You have or had a situation where Men who committed rape were tried and sentenced for the crime and women were told ways that could help them to avoid very high risk situations where rapes are much more likely to happen. They were not blamed for the rape but held responsible for their actions alone. If they were blamed they would be in prison not the man. Yo…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:27 PM
1

That puts the constant rape schedule on men. and it is not ours to bear. people need to focus on both what the perp did and what the victim did. I think I see the problem here. To me Equality is even positions of power and agency held by both men and women. Where women are culpable for their mistakes on equal ground as men are. To you equality means men get an equal share of the victim pie. Where they too can be caudled and catered to. You want an equal society of weak helpless little people all…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:09 PM
1

They want 100% male responsibility. And by passing back the victims role in engaging in risky behavior we achieve their goals. Are you slow? And a victim is at least 50% responsible for most situations. They choose to drink, to flirt, to go home with, to fool around with etc. They are not to blame for the rape its self but for putting themselves into the situation where it happened. You just agree with them. They are never to be held accountable. So stay out of this debate or declare your femini…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:55 PM
1

You still fail to see the point. Think of it this way there are two 50lb bags of shit to haul. Their message means men have to haul 100lbs of shit. Passing it back to the right way gives them back their bag of shit and the men are back to just doing their share. That benefits men. GET IT?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:36 PM
1

Taking the entire onus of rape prevention off of mens shoulders is advocating for men. Again don't presume to tell others how to advocate. I have worked with victims. Male and female. I have spoken about the issue of men and boys being allowed to slip through the cracks of suicide prevention at suicide prevention marches. I have expressed to my company that asking for contributions to womens health studies every month and never collecting for things like prostate cancer is bias and we have since…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:09 PM
1

No I am saying that making the social understanding that MALES must stop rape as the best way to protect women from male rapists I gynocentric. It puts all of societal burden upon the male be they the rapist or random guys the campaign encourages to white knight any "sketchy" situation they see. Placing accountability, personal responsibility, and self reliance back into womens hands ends that bull shit message. The main issue is that the way they propose slants perception toward men as bad guys…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:55 PM
2

As I said. That is great. You choose to help people. Not to help only those people deemed worthy. And you choose to be in a position to help without adopting the stereotyping and sexism that pervades in the field. I'm not kidding you and more like you are what the field needs. Not more womens studies majors with flaming chips on their shoulders.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:49 PM
1

You really are an idiot. White knighting is swooping in to take a beating for poor defenseless girls. It is passing the blame onto others rather than on the woman. It is not telling women to put on their big girl pants and take responsibility. In fact that is the opposite of white knighting it is handing the shield and lance to the girl and saying "It's on you!" Giving a shit about damaging social messages that hurt women is not white knighting it is being a decent human being. What you propose …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:40 PM
1

They didn't sit down and start talking about the best way to apply Nazism, and make this their primary goal. That is moronic and doesn't compare. They did espouse both the flaws in Nazism while stating the much better practice of the west or in the case of Russia they promoted the virtues of communism. And MOTHER FUCKING AGAIN! WE are doing that as you aptly show by linking to where we are already doing that. Stop telling people how to spend their time. WE ARE ADRESSING BOTH ASPECTS!. If you don…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:35 PM
1

No it isn't. It is refuting that victims (most commonly perceived as women) are not helpless nor entirely blameless in this. And that They are accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:26 PM
1

Yes. We know this. So fucking what? Yes it is a satirical campaign to sway the social opinion on rape from "it can be prevented through risk management by victims to shaming potential perpetrators" In the realm of gendered rape this means Female hypoagency and male danger. That is a propaganda campaign to get and keep society on page to support their gynocentrism. And it needs to be refuted. You keep fucking assuming only you get it. We all get it and we don't like it. And many of us see that co…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:08 PM
1

Great example considering that, Russia, Great Britain, And the US spent quite a lot of time, resources and money on their own counter propaganda campaigns including airdropping pamphlets refuting the Nazi rhetoric as well as expressing there the reich was destructive.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:02 PM
1

Debunking their most prolific statements is part of debunking them.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:45 PM
1

If their ideology controls the social attitudes and out thoughts are silenced in the social attitude. How do you suppose any change will be effected in either legislation or advocacy research. They are not going to give up their entrenchment in advocacy willingly. We need to show the society that they are leading them down an unhealthy and disingenuous path.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:22 PM
5

The future of sex in the western world. This kissing has been getting pretty intense. I hope the judge blows the whistle soon. thought Joe Tweeet! (disembodied voice over a PA system in the government approved sexual encounter facility) "Disengage kissing" "If both parties agree to entering phase two involving the light touching of genitals through clothing you may begin at my signal!" I hope. I hope. I hope. thought Sue. Tweet! "YES!" Sue and Joe both exhale Behind the two way mirror the SIC se…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:14 PM
1

Go fry those fish then.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:00 PM
1

our civil rights are under attack by the transfer of all focus on the issue of rape to perpetrator (read men in todays system). So our civil rights are under attack by people being supported by those they have roped in with memes and gimmicks like this. The meme is meant to generate support for their ideology.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:00 PM
3

Confusing because the dog was male and it had a boner. So obviously it wanted her. I chalk it up to the neotany powers of puppy-dog eyes.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:51 PM
1

You don't decide what is a mistake or not Sigil.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:46 PM
1

The meme started and was propagated by radical feminists in the victim advocacy industry during a slut walk campaign. It is a tool that they implemented to control the way people view the issue. It isn't just some harmless teenage girls having a lark. It is young men and women believing it's message because no one is stepping up to call bull shit. And you want it to stay that way. Seriously just butt out of this aspect of the debate.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:45 PM
1

We do both. Don't want to be part of this then don't. Go pull stats. No one is stopping you. You interjected with your "We do this not that" "we are making a mistake" "Follow me I know the way!" attitude. Don't want to be part of this aspect of the debate? Butt out.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:43 PM
1

Actually Erin Also continues to espouse her knowledge of the realities of domestic violence in regards to both men and women. She refutes the feminist ideology within the system by discussing the issue itself. Exactly what we are doing here. Discussing the fallacy of the accepted paradigm. And discussing the healthier way of addressing the issue. She did not abandon being a victims advocate to become an MR advocate. Just as we don't have to abandon advocating for rape victims to be MR advocates.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:38 PM
1

There are 25 posts on the front page of MRM sub right now. One is of this nature. Get the fuck over it. 1in25 focus on the other 24 and stay off your high horse. Because if you can't handle 1in25 you are in essence trying to silence others. This is MRM not Sigils boys club.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:21 PM
1

No not every time. Nice ad absurdum. But yes men should be open about the realities of rape. Both the faults of men and women. We should be demonstrating that we have constructive and helpful input on the subject. Because allowing anyone with questions or concerns to simply defer to the pros is in essence telling them to go get trained in the misandric ways of feminism. Pizzey did the same. she addressed both that A)women commit domestic violence as well as men and in equal numbers. and B) that …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:17 PM
1

WE DO BOTH. focus on the one you prefer but shut up about trying to silence others.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:11 PM
1

Viral internet memes are how they disseminate their bull shit. Ignoring those is giving them free reign to control the dialogue.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:55 PM
1

We do that. We do expose the lies in the stats. But we also expose the lies in the advocacy campaigns such as this "meme" is. Seriously go talk to Pizzey when she does her AMA. Allowing feminism to control the dialogue to the people unchallenged is a recipe for failure.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:53 PM
1

I am aware that they promote those things. I worked in and around the fucking industry. However, especially on campuses they also promote. "Go ahead and go out wearing next to nothing, get blasted, hang all over a strange guy at the bar, go home with him, get naked with him, fool around if ya want, and if you wake up tomorrow and think hey i'm not so happy about all that went down last night. Don't worry it's not your fault and we will get that pig for ya. This is a big fucking problem for men. …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:34 PM
1

Do you not get that the domestic violence and rape crisis industries are key facilitators of a huge number of the injustices MR is fighting? Go have a talk with Erin Pizzey. She will be here Saturday.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:31 PM
1

No but refuting the decidedly anti male and pro female messages in the victim industry is an MRM issue. You don't like it focus on other shit. And don't start in with the treat women as children shit again. You treat women as children by saying they can never be questioned or at fault. I say they are adults and adults mitigate risk through responsible actions. It is the Victim industry treating women as precious little victims whose feelings are more important than common sense and prevention. Y…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:29 PM
1

If I am squared off against an assailant with a knife it is wise for me to watch the knife and disarm them before attempting to restrain them. What you are advising here is that we ignore the knife. That's a great way to be repeatedly stabbed.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:17 PM
1

Nice try. And did you accidently just make rape a gendered issue? I said outsiders. Not little damsels. Outsiders means both men and women. Telling both men and women what behaviors have been proven to elevate the risk of being victimized is a humanitarian goal. We are MRM and many moved toward MHRM because it isn't just about men but people. So if you want to call me a white knight for not wanting to see women or men be victimized have at it. Your argument is mentally deficient seriously. And n…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:15 PM
1

Your superiority complex is showing again. Lead us oh wise Sigil. Give me a break. Coutering the oppositions most prolific arguments, which include viral meme, is important. It offers the uninitiated a chance to hear both sides. Shutting up about it serves their goals not MRAs.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:04 PM
1

We are responding to the message of those viral memes with counter argument. You see it wrong because you agree with the feminist established idea that Victim = not even culpable for any of their own actions which precipitated the attack. Essentially on this topic you agree with female lack of agency. And you support not arguing against memes and campaigns which do nothing but advance female entitlement and lack of accountability. In short you want MRA to drop it and allow an off the rails campa…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:42 PM
1

Our response is to rationally explain that offering rape prevention tips on the victim side is not as they say "Victim blaming" It denies them the freedom to simply drop the entire onus of a complex issue in the lap of men. And it points out that they should not be allowed to set up a system by in which woman invariably equals truthful innocent and in need of protection and men as dangerous predators in need of education on the basic ideals of society.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:30 PM
1

We do that as well here. But that does not bean that we simply allow Radical feminist theory to hold the stage in dialogue unchecked. And this meme, slut walk, and all of the other "don't be that guy" etc. campaigns out there are absolutely something we need to have a voice on. Because those in the middle don't see the stats and the studies. They see the endless victim culture advertising of feminism and they jump on board because they don't even see the misandry, and blatant lies of those campa…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:26 PM
1

Debunking them and discussing how idiotic they are often is the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:16 PM
1

Letting feminists who hold to patriarchy theory and rape culture theory determine what constitutes rape, what constitutes consent, and what measure should be employed to prevent rape is not a good idea for men. They have held the reigns on the issues of domestic violence and sexual violence for a few decades now and look where they have brought us. All of those issues you say are MR issues are propagated by the same people who propagate the message of the meme. This makes the meme one of their t…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:06 PM
1

No because the silencing men and denial of female agency is a tool of feminism and a source for the inequality men face. By dominating the debate with their message that Victims (read women) are never to be considered even slightly reckless no matter what they do, and that the entirety of the situation was created and cultivated and carried out by the rapist (read man) they imbed into cultural consciousness their patriarchy and rape culture theories. This allows for the progression of the use of…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:01 PM
1

Here is a quote from a Salon article. in our society. The fact that this conversation even continues to be victim-based is a sign of that. We all keep the conversation on what is and is not the duty of the victim rather than the real heart of the problem which is the fact that so many men still believe it's okay to take what they want when they want it. It is as simple as changing from "don't get raped" to "don't rape." Which seems to fit what you said. Which is exactly the meaning I understood …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:36 PM
1

It seems that the Don't get raped tumbler page would support the meaning inferred by MRAs on this sub. As well as the meaning I stated earlier. In fact every single article or web page, addressing this particular campaign, that come up on a google search, Says the same thing I said above almost to the letter.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:16 PM
1

Typical. Point to issue and complain. Do nothing to solve issue. You have not once explained the meme (according to your understanding)in this entire thread. Except if you count that ridiculous if abc then xyz and lmnop nonsense you blathered out at one point, which meant nothing to anyone and the responses you got showed that.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:55 PM
1

The common understanding of that MEME is to say that telling someone not to rape is just as ridiculous as telling someone not to be raped. It started I believe at a slut walk in GB or Canada and has taken of from there. It is essentially a counter to what they claim is "Victim blaming" in this case The (police chief?) who made a statement about young ladies dress provocatively getting raped. Thus the birth of slut walk and this sign which became a MEME. If they have changed the definition since …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:27 PM
1

That can apply to paying for prenatal care as well.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:17 PM
1

There you have it. You believe as the feminists believe, That advice to a rape victim or anything approaching criticism of the behavior patterns which greatly elevate the potential to be raped, is victim blaming and cannot be tolerated. Thus you Toe the feminist line. You may try to say to go ask a rape crisis councilor their opinion. Well I have. I have worked with many of them. And guess what most of them are Tumbler in Action style feminists. So no surprise that they back the feminist asserti…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:13 PM
1

Again. You fail to give explanation and your "go ask momma" line. No sorry Feminism is not a relevant go to source for information.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:04 PM
1

Seems to me that you have not once stated what you believe they mean. You just tell people to "go ask what they mean in R//Feminism. Or you just rage that they are wrong, that they are ignorant, etc. So, Educate. Tell them what they mean in a semi lucid fashion. Then explain why they are something MRAs should not be discussing. That is how you make a point.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:27 PM
1

No you have a hang up about ever taking either partial blame for your part in anything bad, or taking critical advice on how to be safer.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:22 PM
0

Thank you. You go against their "victim Blaming" nonsense and offer advice. That is great. And thank you for working in that office. Rape crisis advocacy groups typically could use some more sensible and unbiased people like you. Why, I bet you would even speak to a male victim and take him seriously. You are part of what MRA needs. An actual change in an organization which has been decidedly against men for too long.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:20 PM
1

And yet your response to anyone who implies that there is a such thing as rape prevention through behavior change is to tell them they are wrong, and to just go ask at the Feminism sub.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:14 PM
2

I know. It just (can I say fucking blows to you in a comment? Please answer enthusiastically.) fucking blows how far this is going and how sane minds are not prevailing. Oh shit! I just said blows to a female. Please don't call the cops I'll edit!
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:44 AM
2

Your go to response to every valid statement. You toe the feminist line on this topic and it shows more with each of your responses.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:42 AM
2

That is your hang up not every ones. Many people are capable of being criticized and accepting the value of advice.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:57 AM
1

Thank you for sharing and I understand how hard it can be to do so. You made mistakes like you said "because you were young". You adjusted and take precautions now. That is the right thing to do. You do acknowledge your mistake. Have you forgiven yourself for that? And have you accepted that to make mistakes is to be human? I hope so. You are not at fault for what took place. What I want you to consider is that the messages in regards to rape are not entirely meant for the ears of the victim. Wh…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:40 AM
1

I agree. It is absurd. I don't mind being coaxed by my SO when I'm initially not raring to go. But if equality is they key, and the stretched out definitions hold. Well then it is good to have the facts of who is victim of the new definition more frequently. What I hate most in all of this is that the simplest human interactions are being criminalized by these theories and re-definitions. I don't want to loose being able to be with someone without a billion regulations to follow to keep me out o…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:14 AM
1

Christ that is a staggering number. I could see it as possible though. Coercion is considered seduction if women do it.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:46 AM
1

Actually the description you just gave is such incredible bullshit I thought you were parodying parroting that type of logic.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:10 AM
1

Thank you! You can't "protect people from self blame". You engage with them to process it to self-forgiveness. Exactly. You help them heal that aspect of the event. And you cannot address that if you pretend it does not exist. This is essentially what I argued in 100 posts here. I get what sigils argument was in relation to the repetitiveness of those meme posts. And I agree to an extent with her thoughts on it. I had to say something though when she made statements which parrot the victim indus…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:06 AM
1

I was unaware of the sub. Perhaps I will see if I can be of help there. But then again as I said before this is something that has come to me. I never thrust my ideas upon someone they inquire to me. Which means they already see something which could help them I simply share it. Just as counselors methods vary so to do victims individual needs. I will probably stick to helping those in my life who ask. Just as I do for suicide awareness/prevention/and grief counseling of family of a suicide.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:54 AM
1

I never mentioned choice of clothing. And no I am note equating them to a child. Which leaves us with Yes, some amount of personal responsibility lies with the victim if they exhibited a behavior which elevates their risk. I can understand what you are saying in regards to the example of setting a fire as opposed to talking back. Yet talking back is not something that in and of itself can be a problem even without the outside repercussion of the beating. Perhaps a middle ground of drinking could…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:42 AM
2

This is why I address those issues in a separate post directed toward Sigil. I did not make it a part of my response to the issue being discussed. I am not assuming anything. I am drawing a conclusion based upon the nature, wording, and message of many examples of posts. A repetitive pattern of activity is reason to make note. This is not a one off situation. It is a near constant. If people were distracted I apologize however I did make it clear in that response that it was a personal observati…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:33 PM
2

When someone decides to debate a post, not with refutation, counter argument, or reasoned response. But rather choose to conflate the statement they oppose with something quite obviously not said in that post. They are being either deliberately dishonest or they lack the skill to debate in such serious matters.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:27 PM
1

There are adults there are children and there are immature adults and teens. Teens and immature adults, especially those here on reddit often, are aware of what post modernist debate is. Whether by definition or in practice like those over at SRS.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:25 PM
1

Yes rape can occur in committed relationships. But the frequency is less. so therefore risk is mitigated. And knowing the person for more than a few hours or days goes a long way to establishing their character and the risk they may present. It is not a double standard because a guy who jumps around is more likely to come across a girl who will resent it and perhaps file a false allegation, or lie about birth control, or pass on a disease. And the last part. No it implies that for these types of…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:22 PM
2

Where and by how much would the variables here need to change before it becomes a good idea for a female to invite a male she meets into her home? Criteria could include her age, his age, him being a biker, how long they had met, nobody being home Yes all of those things. Or even one of them. Is it that crazy to stop and think about what you are doing before you do it? You are acting as if being responsible and making good judgments are some insurmountable task. It stands to reason that; A guy y…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:14 PM
2

No we are not. However, since false accusation is a power tool used against men, fighting against the idea that rape is an issue suffered by women and created by men is in the interests of MR. Brining awareness to the flaws in that mentality is important to change the culture which presumes the accused guilty. Do I feel MR on reddit focuses too heavily on the issue? Sometimes yes they do. But it is a valid concern which holds more immediate threat than many other MR issues. Only the married men …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:33 PM
2

Again. That meme voted to the top is about only addressing one side of the issue of rape. And the flaw there-in. You lie the makers of such posters feel that any amount of cautionary debate over a victims risk behavior is wrong. You support the idea that it is for only the perpetrator to stop such acts even when that is factually wrong. You do this because to you a victim is a holy being. A precious flower that needs nothing but love and delicacy. And even if your heart is in the right place, yo…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:16 PM
2

No. you are wrong. A person with a skill or ability is not lesser than a hack with a slip of paper. History teaches us this every day, in all fields. Andrea Dworkin had lots of credentials. She was severely disturbed and was allowed to spout damaging garbage for years on the basis of those credentials. Again unsolicited? Never. Someone comes to me to talk. I talk. I also tell them to continue to see a professional as they may need something I cannot give. I also tell them that I promise nothing.…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:01 PM
4

And this reply to you personally. I have been around this sub for quite some time. I spend effort in researching and understanding both sides of the gender debate. I have made myself acquainted with the styles and ideas of the two major groups at play in this debate. And seeing your responses and posts here on the MR sub, you come off as someone deeply imbedded into feminist theory. Perhaps you are a feminist exile. Hard to say. But frequently your arguments hold all of the same ideas of feminis…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:30 PM
4

I know how words are used. What does that matter? Councilors of PTSD are not uniform in their approach nor do they treat differing kinds of PTSD the same. And any one of those councilors who refuse to address risk behavior only serve to ensure elevated likelihood of additional victimization. No it think that someone who passed out and was raped, who goes on to do so again. Has not understood what risk behavior means. And while they may "know" they made a mistake not admitting to such is counter …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:20 PM
3

I know more about this than you could ever imagine. I have lived it, survived it, and helped many to get past it. I am a man who was actually trusted to guard a safe house for victims. Those ones with unlisted addresses. I am better suited to help a victim of this type of abuse than any feminist theory/psych major with a chip on her shoulder. And you (oddly enough for a frequent poster on the MRA sub) toe the line of that victim industry to the T. Any woman who has been abused/raped who attends …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:07 PM
4

And I believe that people who want to perpetuate the victim status of people who have been abused but refusing to give them their personal autonomy back are dangerous and should have no voice in the debate at all. My analogy is fine to anyone who sees that maintaining victim status is moronic, the idea is to make their victimization an event in the past and make them a whole and strong person again. If someone wants to get strong them must challenge themselves. If I want big biceps I lift weight…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:49 PM
2

See again you discuss like an idiot. The analogy I used was just fine. Because it put across the exact point I was making. That there are actions that a victim can engage in prior to becoming a victim which greatly increase the likelihood of being victimized. Also some of those behaviors (such as setting fire to couches) are poor choices even if one does not get hurt by an outside individual for it. I think a victim of rape can absolutely benefit from learning more from the event than that they …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:30 PM
6

Again, No! An analogy is a comparison of two things. In mine I compared one type of assault to another type of assault. Rape and abuse are both assaults. not "overreaching punishment for wrongdoing" YOU supplied those words and that deliberately moronic interpretation. also A woman who has been raped, and a severely beaten child are similar in that both are victims of an assault. It is not saying women are children it is saying two people who have suffered assault, whether the assault is the sam…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:04 PM
9

That is fucking ridiculous. Keep your childish post-modernist argumentation style out of adult discussion please. It won't work on me. Conflating my statement to your own absurd interpretation does not negate the argument. No! I see rape as a terrible act done by an individual just as severe child abuse is a terrible act done by an individual. Both are physical assaults. And no I do not see women as children is see Rape victims as human beings who have been hurt just as I see a horribly abused c…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:46 PM
7

A child with PTSD from an extreme beating, delivered by a parent, for setting fire to the couch, should be counceled to understand that the parents action was wrong. And yet also that setting couches on fire is not a good thing. There is nothing wrong with explaining that while the victim is not responsible for the actions/reactions of others. They absolutely can mitigate potential risks through personal behavior changes.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:13 PM
2

Yea Florida is nice like that. But other fees down there are crazy. And a very large number of the upper quintile of income earners in the US do at least have an office in NYC
/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:54 PM
4

NYC income tax. They have their own
/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:50 PM
2

20.1%federal 8.2% state 5% NYC total 33.3%
/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:46 PM
2

Yea I get that is what they imagine. But they fail to realize that every populous uprising against an authoritarian regime in history has been led by men. The male of the species has a knack for casting off their shackles and pummeling those who once held their leash.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:20 PM
2

Wouldn't happen that way. By cutting the male population to say 10% as they have proposed turns the reproductive value paradigm on its head. Making the remaining males reproductive value much higher than the females. That 10% of males could easily turn that power into the ultimate misogynist rape fest feminist fear. I can already hear that unified voice of that ten percent. "you want my sperm? Sammich!" and the cacophony of every female approaching 30-35 years old opening their fridges.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:12 PM
2

If the entire male population were to be exterminated as they propose it would of course lead to the extermination of the entire human species. Essentially they call for the end of human kind. After about 50 some odd years of an aging lesbian jamboree.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:02 PM
3

A claim like hers is well met with an equally ignorant and bias claim. Like, "Women were put on this earth to bear mens children and clean their homes. How are you typing with a baby in one arm and a broom in the other?"
/r/MensRights23/04/13 02:08 PM
1

No. The discussion pertains to the premise that women "are forced" they are not FORCED they need to grow up and accept that their choice equals agreeing to the obligations and trade offs that come with that choice. And they need to stop bitching that it is Unfair or FORCED upon them. The other choices I mention such as parent or nannies have to be addressed because we have gone so far already off the rails on this issue that many cannot take on the best option which is one parent at home with th…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:05 PM
10

Ahh ok I see the source of the problem now. You seem to think that all choices should come free of responsibility. Choice A is invalid? It is the most valid. Don't want to be responsible for a child? Don't have one. That simple. Choice B) may not be the best for the kid and I agree to that but an imperfect option still remains an option. Choice C) Again Obligated to take responsiblility for ones decisions is not forced. It is being a fucking grown up. Choice D) is not inrelavant at all. Since di…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:36 PM
2

Yes. It was. Didn't you know god is a man? Thus the growing numbers of Atheist Feminists. I find they actually believe in god most times and are only Atheist in the way a petulant 6 year old states "your not my mommy/daddy" when having a hissy fit.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:38 PM
8

It is not Forced. Choice A)don't have kids. Choice B)have kids only when you can afford dedicated child care from outside source. Choice C)Have kids and agree for the father to be the primary care giver. Choice D) don't divorce your kids father. Choice E) make sure that you have some close family like your parents who can help out. All of those are choices and the first one alone eliminates all of the FORCED bs.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:35 PM
8

And this is how it becomes mens fault. Women effected by their nature--Women get mad at nature--men not effected by nature in the same ways---women jealous---men suck. The logic of bashing men because of biology simply pisses me off.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:08 PM
22

Pardon me for stating the obvious, but it is only females who can have babies. That means forced career breaks once twice or perhaps more times. This usually happens when women are in their 30s Note the word FORCED. what women out there are being FORCED to have kids? Seriously this is why they can not wrap their heads around the pay gap being controlled by personal choices. Nothing is a choice for them even if it is obviously something they chose. ZERO AGENCY. It is so pathetic. Come on ladies g…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 02:32 PM
2

Most likely because constant asking for reassurance of consent is taken, by most women, as a sign of insecurity and lack of assertiveness and they see it as a turn off. Funny how the things feminists demand are the things that turn them off.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:09 AM
1

I commented on the thread essentially what you just said here. I have never once in my entire life had a dialogue of request for consent and response. Not once. And I have never had sex which was not consentual by both parties. I think the very idea of stopping in the middle of fooling arround to say "would you like to..." is obsurd. Closest I ever came was "wan't to go up to my room" Which was answered "yes" but I never asked specifically about sex. I just took the fact that she had her clothes…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 08:27 PM
4

Tell that to the Tea Party whose message was quite similar infact to that of OWS and yet they were destroyed by acusations of racial biggotry. It is one of the strongest tools of the post modernist debator to simply accuse the oposition of racial bigotry to silence them. Our arguments will never be heard if we allow them to paint us as a group unworthy of a fair listen.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:43 PM
3

People like her are sociopaths on the same level as Dahmer and Manson. They care for nothing in the world aside from their own immediate wants. Arias is the same and so was Anthony. And we let them go.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:36 PM
5

Not only should this young woman be prosecuted for murder in regards the young man she accused, but also she should be prosecuted for ruining the lives of the two men she set up to kill him. Those two men are culpable for their actions, true, yet they acted on the information given them by her. Not only did her sociopathic nature lead to a death, it also prompted two other men to commit an act which will cost them each years of their lives.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 02:15 PM
2

And a bank roller. Thus the conundrum.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:27 PM
3

Sorry about that. The orange likely comes from New Jersey and leaches into the Atlantic where it washes up onto your shores.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:26 PM
2

So basically she had no problem with exuberantly supporting feminist laws when they were fucking over every man in the country. But when her son got slammed in the system she helped make she calls foul. Honestly I can't feel bad for her.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:16 PM
1

I hate that crap. Remember when society was aware that many or most strippers were actually downtrodden single moms or drug/alcohol addicts with no education or skills to earn a better living? I do. But now they are empowered super girls. When and why did this happen because they are the same gorls as they used to be.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:01 PM
1

That's quite possible. Many of the customs of Sharia as well as other religious "laws" are based in countering the innate aspects of humanity and nature that ancient civilizations deemed counter to maintaining a healthy society. There is also the tradition referred to as "The tongued ones" from criminal proceedings in early Anglo-Saxon cultures. This tradition posited that certain peoples words were inherently true when testifying on certain issues. A womans testimony was considered true and inc…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 06:08 PM
52

Pop culture = Raunch culture. Pop culture is predominantly steered by women between the ages of 14 and 30. So lets fix raunch culture by attacking boys. 0% accountability + 0% agency = equality
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:22 PM
1

I'm stating it because the whole "slut shaming" debate is often laid at the feet of men. And it is a female on female issue predominantly. It has context here in that the accusation word of women is taken as gospel. Woman says "He Hit me!" or "He raped me!" or "She is a slut!" And people believe it. Not so on the word of men. The issue on presumed innocence/guilt as well as convictions for crimes has two contributors. 1)men are guilty liars. 2)women are innocent victims.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:48 PM
0

Women who are called a slut are typically called a slut by other women. Not men.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:27 PM
2

Oh I know women who share my beliefs. Good ones who don't play the princess/devil/angel/slut game. So I have decided to focus on them and enjoy life. Just gonna let the shitty people blow them selves up.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 09:11 PM
6

I don't disagree. But I do not believe its gonna happen. Western women are so used to this you go girl culture, that in connection with a pervasive entitlement culture?? Really you think some complaining by men will change how women especially white middle class women (who make up the majority of feminists) (and who currently sit at the very top of the self serving, entitled, spoiled rotten heap) see the world around them. Sure we can complain and have good sound reasons to do so, but the result…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:59 PM
3

It is time that this sub reddit reaches the conclusion that the media is aware that women love to have their egos stroked, even when what is said is preposterous lies. The only way this stuff ends is for women to drop their egos. Not gonna happen.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:36 PM
3

I debated this in a thread about Margaret Thatcher a few days ago. Feminism is not about individual female agency and success. It is about female elevation as a collective (see Marxism). The women as prolls men as bourgeoisie Scenario underlies each and every feminist theory and ideal. They never celebrate a successful woman unless she toes the line of "all women should be here too,, because - vagina". Sadly the social justice league went full black ops on it and I walked away shaking my head.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:33 PM
-1

I can see why you make this connection. However the reason you fail to see it as part of Marxism is because you don't see that Marxism in practice always serves to create an elite beaurocratic class. This is what Feminism and liberal democrats aim for. Capitalist idealism is meritocracy Marxism is governmental elitism. The end result of Marxism in the west is a wealthy government class made up of professors, petty governmental employees, and their stooges. Just like USSR ended up with. And it ha…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:20 PM
-1

ohh yea I have had this talk with you. I'm not gonna bother. You are in a bubble where you actually think that Feminism and the far left are capitalist. Because demanding more governmental funds and more forced governmental regulation are such capitalist ideals. LOL
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:52 PM
-1

If leftist = socialist then where exactly would these conservatives be wrong in that assertion? Unless this is coming from an actual moderate democrat in which case you may want to face the fact that your party has been hijacked by social marxists. I lean right and have no problem putting down the far right ideologues why do the dems have such a hard time putting down their crazed leftists?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:12 PM
0

Or you interrupted her "50 shades" role play, and she gets you locked up for stalking.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:33 PM
2

Ok. I will allow that this particular tactic to reduce rape is acceptable on the very same day that I see posters here and there saying. "Only women can stop Infanticide". Since women commit the majority of those. Maybe "Only females can stop shop lifting" also predominantly female perpetrated. Or "Only moms can stop child abuse" Since they do the lions share of that as well.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:27 PM
2

Afraid not. First link one is to a MR post about not playing the NAFALT game, where link two is to a comment made in MR you deem as sexist. how do those compare. Maybe replace link one with a sexist comment made in a feminist sub. And finally a post denying all ills of feminism on a feminism sub, supported by no actual examples or sources is not addressing the extreme outliers, which is the subject, not the "misconceptions" And finally if you look at link two, the post you dislike received two u…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:34 PM
1

I'm not sure I catch your meaning. I'm buzzed ATM so could be that. But extrapolate a bit if you would.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:12 AM
1

Rewatched to refresh. Yes that is one of her best. It puts all of this into perspective. Feminism and the modern woman is actually an attempt at an unfettered return to animalistic nature in sexual selection why keeping the male in the elevated controlled humanistic role. For equality sake we either have to have "Traditionalism" which is human control and moral stricture in command of sexuality or the return of both male and female to the primitive animal side. GWW trends toward the let both sid…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:56 AM
1

GWW is great. She is a modern day intellectual philosopher and I give her crazy props. However she has her weaker points where her base in evolutionary psych can obscure humanity. To me what defines human is being capable of excelling beyond nature into something more. She holds to humans being controlled by base nature. She is right, but only when humanity stops striving to be more.. I love her work though.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:29 AM
1

The very same twenty something girls who were asking to scan my balls. Bottom line is that sexually forward women are empowered, sexually forward med are creeps.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:25 AM
3

Perhaps this explains why women have no problem with a male doctor staring at their crotch for 10 minutes but have made male mammography techs extinct. And ultrasound is going the same direction.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:16 PM
11

Eh. I don't sweat it any more. I do good work, I'm appreciated by my patients, and I simply don't respond. But I can tell you, from my experience the vast bulk of sexually inappropriate commentary comes from the females in my work environment. I have heard nurses discussing a comatose mans cock size and a lesbian ultrasound tech mention getting turned on when she does trans vaginal exams. The guys are professional or at least keep their mouth shut as far as I have seen. I could go on and on. My …
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:41 PM
24

Welcome to the modern world. Where a guy trying to pursue a career he cares about is creepy, and telling a girl that it is not ok to ask a guy about his cock is slut shaming. I went to school for a medical art as well. The girls in the ultrasound department asked me (while giggling) if they could practice testicular exams on me almost daily. When I got tired of it and said I would agree if they agreed to let me practice a mammography exam on them I was called out by the department head.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:52 PM
2

I have seen an entire office full of women scurry, like frightened rabbits, away from a coworker with a bloody hangnail. This author needs to just shut up with her idiotic vagina=super hero ideas. There are women who can handle this stuff but most can't same goes for men. The only difference is that men who have played heavy sports and/or worked in manual jobs have been desensitized to trauma and react more calmly. The writer is an idiot and I'm glad no one like her was there. An injury of that …
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:39 PM
1

What is an Everton? Ahh Football. I'm American so not huge on soccer. When I do watch I like Manchester or UFB stuttgart and the German national team in the world cup.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:45 AM
2

That would fly like the proverbial lead balloon with the mother, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 02:08 PM
3

It actually went well with quite a few. Most of my coworkers are aware of the jobs I have done in the past, including working at a psychiatric emergency clinic, a children's group home, A trauma center, and work with various emergency and social services. I was not hostile about my stance and I gave many of them the name of the gender neutral crisis center that I donated to in lieu of the suggested center that caters only to women.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 01:55 AM
1

You mention the slavery issue and I am glad. Though slavery was no abolished in the 50s. Many historians have made asked the question of what it was that triggered the decline of slavery's popularity. One very interesting theory is empathy. Looking at the US. The industrializing north was the first to slide away from justification of slavery. The population of industrial workers in the north were better suited to see a slave on more equal footing. A man working for a coal mine or steel industry …
/r/MensRights15/02/13 01:22 AM
1

I agree with your sentiment. However I think that given the nature and prevalence of the bias, it would be easier to "harm" women further than to be more just to men. It won't last long. Once the problematic laws are effecting women to the point they are already effecting men, the law will be changed for the better. It is sad to admit but what I feel is that it is easier to use the compassion for women to reach an end than it is to create compassion for men.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:49 PM
1

Back at ya. I always try to be civil when approached in a civil manner. I honestly agree with you in terms of it being a case by case issue. However For legal purposes I feel that that makes judgments too subjective. We are already aware of the deep rooted double standards in regards to these matters. Even with the system as it is we see huge discrepancies in the case findings when the sexes of perpetrator and victim are exchanged. Adompting a more subjective code of law would serve only to open…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:28 PM
1

Not true. The young man is consenting to sex not fatherhood. Just as a victim of fraud is consenting to one thing and getting another or nothing at all. Women have made it a priority to have complete unilateral power over procreation. With that power comes resposibility.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:03 PM
0

We have criminal laws that deal with financial issues as well. Such as fraud, and theft. If we have laws to protect an individual from being taken by confidence scams, how is this different?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:21 PM
47

My work place is comemorating the "go Red for Women" event today and they urged all staff to wear red. This included numerous e-mails from HR over the last week. I am dressed from head to toe in blue. And have been asked why by many other staff. I have told each one that men count as well.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:04 PM
1

No they aren't. Because before these days we didn't think about it. But with Boys in highschool paying child support to some horny teacher we need to considder it now.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:46 PM
1

Yeah? Did you have the capacity and means to support a child?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:19 PM
1

Nice try, oh so special type of woman.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:17 PM
2

The trouble is that this type of test would take weeks to do. By the time the results are in, odds are your name is already on the birth certificate. And once that is signed you are daddy no matter what.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:58 PM
9

The point is to circlejerk indoctrinate.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:23 PM
1

This Sub has been getting trolled hard since the redit of the month and the Feminist author AMA. We painted a target on ourselves and now we are eating bullets.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:49 AM
8

Easy way for feminism to shake this thought. Say it's not true. Lets have some of the top names in feminism come out in the media and say "Sex between a man and a woman is quite natural and wonderful" I'll be waiting.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:08 PM
4

Gather up a large group of men. Contact a local union and ask for support. Gather outside of the lecture hall where she is going to speak. Block the doors. When people come to get in make room for them to pass, hold the door open and say pleasantly "This is what mens rights looks like"
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:35 PM
3

I'm a giver :)
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:51 AM
8

Yea. It shows.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:28 AM
2

As will I.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:00 AM
6

Your mom and dad failed to teach you well. :'(
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:51 AM
3

If the point of MRA is to be equal why is it you think we should not answer on the same level. The reason this kind of response is good is because it makes the observer compare oranges to oranges.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:48 AM
3

It appears to be the same executive director as well. Maybe she got woken up by the shit storm she caused. Maybe at the time of the adds she was a recent grad from a gender studies program and it took a few years of seeing the real world to get it. Who knows. just glad the message has changed and I hope the service has too.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:45 AM
4

It seems the adds were already addressed by fathers and families. I'm glad. However the manager if the offending group just laughed it off and essentially gave all those who criticized her the finger. We need to restructure this abuse industry. It really sickens me. I have seen the misandry first hand by working with some rather unpleasant ladies in that business. It is just so prevalent.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 12:45 AM
3

I'm going to look into it later on tonight. If I find anything I'll post it to you. If it is an old add (even though it is dispicable) it will come off as pendantic to send them a letter. If they are currently using the same tactic they deserve some serious critiquing.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:35 PM
5

Hold off on contact until the age of this add can be verified. Browse the site a bit to see if they are still using it. There is a hyperlink for the assistant directors E-mail on the contact us page.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:19 PM
6

That being the case I think I will look at what their current campaign is. I would hate to rip off a letter about something two years old. If they are still in keeping with this message I will be giving them a big piece of my mind.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:18 PM
27

Yea...gonna write a letter to this group. Hope more of you do the same. This one may be the worst I have seen.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:15 PM
1

When did MRM twist into MHRM?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:18 PM
4

The huffington post was started as an independant news outlet. There were some great writers there and they hit on some often overlooked issues. They also were bipartisan. After the site gained some traction and money there has been a systematic shift. First to go were the conservative writers, followed by most of the men, and replacing them more feminists. This is just another step in the direction the founder of the site intended. Once established and made solvent and lucrative it became the p…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 05:12 PM
7

The test scores do matter here. However the composit grade is what greates the GPA (grade point average) which is the number looked at by universities as well as scholarship and honorary groups. If one gets a 100% on an exam that counts as 10% of the GPA and he/she is consistently graded poorly in participation or other trivialities, the number seen by all of those important agencies will not respect the persons ability. Only the big standardized exams such as SAT and ACT stand alone and hold we…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:59 PM
1

The worst thing that could happen to Marxists and Gender Feminists is for them to get what they want.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:32 PM
2

My name is on there. And all I had to do is get stabbed for the honor. This system is broken. Happily it has not gotten in the way of my employment at all but who knows how it will effect me going forward.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:24 PM
0

Yes. I do believe that the West is well in the grasp of cultural marxism, and that post modern discource is a tool of that ideology. It seems that is the direction that many in my country (U.S) want it to go. I disagree with it but am content to mind my own business and watch them realize the folly just as they did in other nations who chose Marxism.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:37 PM
0

The more popular consensus is that it was a socialist plot not a Nazi plot. That idea holds water more given that the forefront of this post modernism came out of the far left marxists on university campuses and the marxist feminists. Do I believe it's a plot to destablize the country.,.. I dunno. But it adds up nicely enough to lay the finger of accusation in that direction. I wouldn't call it a plot to destablize but I will call it employment of dirty tactics to effect changes that they would …
/r/MensRights09/02/13 04:34 PM
11

Is it just me or does that just not make sense?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:05 PM
7

Nursing has always been a female dominated field. That has it's roots in both the church based medical facilities where the nun were trained as nurses, also in the wars where female recruits staffed the military hospitals because we needed every able man in the trenches. Councelling became a female dominated field in the 50s 60s. Ask Erin Pizzey how that went down. And Human resources became a female dominated field in the 80s when companies had to do a mad scramble under the pressure of sexual …
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:58 PM
1

I can agree to an extent to that issue. MR is supposed to be just a place for stating the issues and discussing them. This sort of post falls more into relationship advice in a way. However it is important to discuss as men. In the dating world we are the walking dead and no one has our backs but us. So outlet of these thoughts is pertinent to MR in my opinion.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:15 PM
1

I agree with half of those :-) I'm more of a landscapes person and I also like deep colors so Thomas Cole and Rembrandt are favorites. I also am a huge fan of Echer and Dali. I also love old stained glass, cathedral architecture, and industrial design. Music is everything excep pop and rap. Neither appeal to me at all.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:12 PM
3

I may just look into it. Thanks. It has always seemed so obvious to me. Even when I was a kid. Read the synopsis and liked it a lot. I will definitely be reading this.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:57 AM
5

Not true. Feminists are very aware of female nature. They simply deny aspects of it in order to create the propaganda needed to make their goals attainable. Feminists use women more deliberately and intrusively than any real or imagined patriarchy ever has.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:51 AM
1

Your uninformed opinion of me is of as much importance to me as understanding (see agreeing with) the more harmful self serving ideas of the feminist movement. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. and anyone who disagrees with me is welcome to do so and I wish them all the best. I presented my point and I defended it already. That is all. Agree/disagree the choice is as much yours as anyone else s. Finally I owe you no favors. As a feminist I'm sure you disagree, my being male and as s…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:48 AM
2

Perhaps the two of us approach art for differing reasons. And that could be due to differing lives and experiences. For me, I don't need to see ugly or vulgar art to get me to see the ugly and vulgar sides of the world. I have seen the results of murder, disease, starvation, and abuse. I have seen all of this first hand in my life. I have seen things I would never wish to detail to others out of respect for their sensitivities. So as far as ugly, vulgar, and emotional I have more than an abundan…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:37 AM
0

You see, here is the thing. I have already responded to all of the same questions you are going to ask. I edited the original post to account for the two quotes. I also stated my case entirely to the last person on here. I don't need to do it all again. If you want to have my side of the argument feel free to read all of that which I already posted. I feel that my stance is covered there, repetition would be pointless. So given that I don't feel it would be a productive use of my time to repeat …
/r/MensRights08/02/13 12:24 AM
1

I have no idea why anyone would do that. Sanity is questionable. And Isn't it though. I love that piece. It ain't easy sculpting stone to look like cloth. And that hollow hood is amazing work. Glad you like it.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:55 PM
0

Nice attempt to misdirect. Or was that an attempt to shame? Hard to tell. But hey who cares. Have a good life.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:52 PM
9

That is just the way it is. The TROs and the threats. The bad mouthing you to friends and familly. All of it is proxy controll of you and setting up for you to look the bad guy at a moments notice. Fuck i'm a bit negative today. Sorry folks....all true though
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:36 PM
30

The RCMP said she called 25 times for help, and once they charged Michael with making a threat. From what I gather, her accusations were frivolous. Take note of this guys! If your girl makes these kinds of accusations against you, and you have done nothing wrong, Get out of there. She is using proxy to controll you and when the other shoe drops she has all she needs to get out of jail free no matter what she does to you. CYOA is the order of business for the modern man.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:49 PM
1

I'll leave you to it then. I, sadly, will only believe there is a bright side when the dawn comes. This shit has been going on for a long time. Women got off for horrible crimes throughout history. None of that is new. What is a bit new is women taking advantage of that fact blatantly. Quote from Ms. Arias. "no jury will convict me."
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:10 PM
3

Second picture is of an "artist" squirting paint out of her vagina onto a canvas. Your two examples are perfect. The first, while edgy due to the nudity, shows women in natural state. It depicts them as simple, human, and wonderful. The second example is foul. It is merely shock value. The woman is defining herself through the lense of emotional weponized biology. We are human and as such at the very least a respectable inigma of the natural world. Why is it we see fit to behave worse than anima…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:28 PM
1

Kacey Anthony case didn't expose it enough to make a difference, neither will this. This country is lost in terms of actual justice. Our courts are a joke. It is all about revenue for the system and toeing the PC line. What we need is a juror or two standing up after the verdict and being heard. We need a same juror to stand up and yell to the roof that this is all a farce. We need judges to throw histrionic lawyers out of the court room. We need recent pictures of perpetraitors hung on the wall…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:09 PM
1

In regards to sexuality, I would say yes, Gay me are less discriminated against than hetero men. This may sound crazy but hetero men are held to the standard of invincible unlike gay men. So hetero men as victims is portrayed as all but impossible. Gay men are allowed more latitude to be victims in society.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 04:12 PM
4

You know that your idea of what art should be is a very modern idea. Art was intended throughout history to inspire. It was done to depict emotion and beauty and thought. Historically art followed that ideal. Only in recent history has embracing the grotesque and the vile become positive. Because of that idea you express. "the point of art is to challenge us and stir something within". I personally feal that this approach to art is for the untallented and the uninspired. Holding the discusting u…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:48 PM
8

No. Because the male-on-female rapes are depicted in a negative light. This is not hard to understand.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:10 PM
1

Ahh. Perhaps you could be mistaken. Even given your superior education. When I say trace components I refer to epithelial cells, small hair fibers, possibly blood cells in small traces. All of which can quite easilly be tied to the female. As to reflex erections. Maybe people have not been taught about them. Even though they have likely had them. Well to me it takes a special type of moron to experience something and never bother to understand what it was.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:11 PM
1

No I do not think that. However the amounts produced differentiate greatly. Not to mention the composition of it as well as trace components which would be unmistakably belonging to the male or female. Yes American sex ed is pathetic. Why do you assume that my level of understanding would be equivalent to that lacking curriculum?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:43 AM
1

Logic doesn't enter in.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:14 PM
1

Because in the uneducated delirium of these people Fascist has no meaning outside of "bad guys". Everyone not of the ingroup is Fascist. Ask this person live and without google access what the definition of fascism is and what countries had fascist governments in the past. Enjoy the blankes face you have ever seen.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 08:15 PM
5

I would agree if we were dismissing male on female rape cases due to the presence of vaginal secretions on the perpetraitors junk. But we don't and we shouldn't. So it is time we stop the deliberate ignorance.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:55 PM
2

Where is the Female Viagra? Since erectile dysfunction is a male issue viagra et al were created to counter that. Vaginal dryness being the female equivalent has the preceding 121 medications available to women to counter it. This issue is false equivalency. Men sought a drug to counter a physical condition not Arousal! Arousal is a mental state. Men are capable of being aroused without having an erection, they are also capable of having an erection without arousal. It is the same idiotic mental…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:34 PM
0

The next time you meet a "radical feminist", ask her if women should deserve more rights than men do. If you get a "no" answer, try rethinking your entire approach to the debate. It'll help. Because no woman has ever lied or misrepresented their intent.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:11 PM
0

Because by the look of him the only time he would have a stimulus response erection would be while he himself is stoking it because he is horny. Corelation /= causation deal.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:33 PM
4

I try to be on the moderate and soft spoken side. However, what you said here is exactly how I feel about this issue. Seriously, Fuck these ignorant shit bags!
/r/MensRights06/02/13 05:31 PM
3

Welcome to NY. It's wonderful /s
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:29 AM
3

The reason that the "gay card" comes out is that it is known to women that they hold just one commodity over men. That is sex for the heterosexual male. When a man boldly and unashamedly makes statements that offend women, They assume he must be gay because only a man who has no interest in that priceless commodity would dare to jeopardize his prospects of getting some. It is like telling a man who just insulted his barber that he must be bald.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:25 AM
-1

We are done here. Get over it.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:00 AM
0

When an author uses literature to express their own ideas of reality " "The Women's Room" is not about the women's movement... but about women's lives today." then the words spoken even by the character are expressions of that authors thoughts. I could use the definition of fiction from a thesaurus if you want.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:44 AM
-1

For the last time. Fiction can express true thought. You are impossibly obtuse. "The Women's Room" is not about the women's movement... but about women's lives today. Thank you for this. Nothing could better show that what she wrote in the story reflects her views of what the world is. She says plain and simple right there about women's lives today Dust take your uneducated self back to your ideologue echo chambers. You lack the mental capacity to make any point. You parrot dogma and understand …
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:40 AM
1

I respond to what is put to me. you wrote. Well, certainly, El Salvador is where it is today because many people of good faith, with very different opinions came together to say “why not?” The people of El Salvador, the women, the men and the children have a right to dream of a future of peace, justice, and human dignity. And I believe that everything you have done to bring your country to this point, as you continue down this road for the fulfillment of that dream -- will make it possible for a…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:52 PM
0

Yes. Take a literature course! Good god. Seriously I can't fathom how thick you are. I can't even debate someone with your level of intellectual decrepitude. Go get an education. From the wiki definition of FICTION! Uses of fiction Although fiction may be viewed as a form of entertainment, it has other uses. Fiction has been used for instructional purposes, such as fictional examples used in school textbooks. It may be used in propaganda and advertising. Although they are not necessarily targete…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:49 PM
1

How? How will it be abused? I'm really curious because I hear this sort of thing all the time. How would the government abuse a database of everyones dna?
/r/MensRights04/02/13 08:20 PM
1

Setting asside the issue of false paternity for a moment; I believe mandatory paternity testing at birth has a side benefit. The influx of funds to genetic labs could help to finance studies of hereditary conditions done at that lab. Like with any business, have one easy low cost product foot the bill for the RnD department. I see nothing but a boon to the genetic labs by mandating this. And who knows, the extra revenue could have the potential to aid in a cure for some cancers etc.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:10 PM
3

New goal in life. To ejaculate frequently into the wives and girlfriends of French polititians. I would love for all of my genetic progeny to have such legs up in life.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:52 PM
1

What exactly is it in what you posted here that refutes the quote I took from this speach. From what I can see here Ms. Clinton was also spouting a lot of other ignorant pandering dribble to reach her audiences nationalism as well. El Salvadore is a nation that people from around the world should look to as a model and example? Salvadore is the gang and drug capitol of the world. They have 10 year olds creeping the streets with automatic weapons. Their government is entirely corrupt. So Hillary …
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:22 PM
-1

“I never found beauty in longing for the impossible and never found the possible to be beyond my reach.” Ayn Rand from Atlas shrugged. I don't want to spend my day searching and posting endess quotes from FICTIONAL texts that represent the political and social ideas of the writer. Writers Use Fiction To Convey A Message. Stop pretending that this is not so. Beyond that. Your endless need to attack what I have posted confuses me. Why have you not even debated the points? You just keep digging to …
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:14 PM
3

I agree she may have an attitude and could alienate some people. But honestly so has everyone who has had to speak out like she does. Sometimes you have to be hard to be heard.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 02:21 AM
8

A good point for you to start would be with Warren Farell. He was also a devoted feminist and continues to make clear that he supports all persons rights. He moved over to the MRM when it became clear that Feminism was turning into a steam roller set on a path of mowing down men. Also Girl Writes What. Though she may be a bit much for you to handle as she is far more openly critical of women. When people scoff you need to judge whether they are worth the effort. Some scoffs are the type you may …
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:46 PM
-2

For one. I responded in the comments to a non idealogue in regards to two of the quotes i mentioned. If anyone wishes to see that it is plain to see. I don't get into discussion with someone like yourself who proudly represents the dross of reddit. Your rage and hurt feelings mean nothing to me. Not because I personally dismiss your feelings, but because if not me you would find someone else to feed your daily need for personal outrage. For the two quotes questioned I clearly stated that there w…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:13 PM
2

So you should sit with your feet up on her desk. She will of course be powerless to stop you. Also inform her that you would like an A+ in the class. Your man will and power should garantee that her weak female self will agree. Then just ignore her and ride out the semester on your Man A.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:19 PM
2

I believe it does have a place on the list. Here is why; The quote displays a degree of male disposability and disregard for the sacrifices mad by men in society. It shows also that she is willing to subvert the suffering of half of the population to pander to a feminist audience. Connect those two facts with that she wants to be the leader of my Nation, and I see that as a threat. Someone with that much power cannot be given the luxury of overlooking half of the population. This quote belongs h…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:26 PM
-2

I have looked deeper into my selected quotes as there was a bit of a hubub over some of them. Yes the Marilyn French quote comes from a work of fiction. I am only willing to give it an asterisk though. Why? Because Atlas Shrugged is fiction and yet the words in it depict the thoughts and ideology of Ayn Rand. Hemmingway wrote "the Old Man and the Sea", a work of fiction inwhich he expressed himself through the main character. The use of fiction to express ones own beliefs is not a concept unknow…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:17 PM
1

I think that sometimes feminists believe that there is a finite amount of equality in the world. And that someone else getting some means less for them.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:04 PM
-6

When given time Maybe I will dredge out more of the misadric tripe these people spouted. But not right now. I'm tired, I just got a pizza and reading all that stuff screws with my mood. Also I don't feel like doing the round and round with someone who will never capitulate regardless of what I bring out.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:18 AM
1

You are right. It can at times be hard not to engage. I felt I needed to say this so I did. I'll likely go back to my quieter and more positive interactions having done.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:10 AM
3

Hitler never physically murdered anyone in his time as leader of the nation. All he did was inspire with rhetoric. So sure words are harmless. And Since i don't want to be accused of just dragging out the old Nazi card. Charles Manson never laid a finger on any one of the victims of the crimes he is currently serving time for killing.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:36 AM
-1

If I have time I will look beyond the wiki to find out. If it was a misquote I will edit the original post and put in a different one for her. Or I will retract that portion with admission of having been misled in my understanding. I did look to upwards of 3-4 sources for each of the quotes i used here. and before you imply it. no not all of them were MRM type pages.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:32 AM
-1

I will take the time to look all of that over when I can. However on quick glance many of that persons supposed refutations of the quotes I gave here are just other quotes. That is not how it works. The people I quoted said many things. Just because they said something else as well does not negate that they said what I have quot
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:27 AM
3

Funny you mention Freud. While he is still considered a founding father of psychology, you will only ever read about him in historical context. His theories were never tested by him, and many modern professionals think he was doing a fair bit of projection. I agree with what you say though and it happens a lot. I was genuinely willing to assuage your doubts if you had them.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:20 AM
3

Back up in what way? Tell me which of the quotes you wonder about and Ill dig up more info when I can. All of those quotes came from published works and most were intermixed with even more of the same rhetoric. I may not be able to provide a video of Dworkin murdering a man but I can drag out many many other quotes that follow the same mentality. Would that be enough? I take no offense to your question and if given time I will gladly try to give you context to settle your fears.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:02 AM
8

This one is close to home for me. In my mid twenties I applied for a job with campus security at Vassar. I was denied the position. The security chief said he ran my application by the assistant dean who had final say in hiring. Her reason for denying me. "He is too young. He will likely make the students uncomfortable and we can't risk having a rape or assault take place from within" Guess who that assistant dean was? And at the time I had been working in both a psych hospital and a group home …
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:42 PM
3

Look up her wiki page. Lots of information there in regards to her home life as a child. Many psychologists believe she was a deeply trouble individual.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:35 PM
4

If you agree to that fine. But lets not pretend that a woman who has attained such a level of success in life is incapable of phrasing a statement properly to convey her sentiment. She could have said "Women and children also suffer from war"
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:32 PM
5

Women are the primary victims of war because the men die, and usually victims are still alive So all of the times we refer to a murder victim we are actually referring to a non entity? The lucky dead one unlike their surviving family members?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:30 PM
1

At times I am in a rush. I tend to reddit at work on slow time and then get busy so rush a post. Also work pc has no spell check. But thanks
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:27 PM
13

Correct. These women I cited are chosen representatives of the movement. It is my opinion that if women and feminists want to deny the influence of these women, it is on them to help us to burn down the scarecrow and proove it.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:01 PM
-1

I see where you are going with this and maybe it is worth my considderation on the matter. In my experience though I have yet tho personally know more than a hand-full of women who would agree that the term MRS. is somehow opressive. I can't think of any who use Ms. in their self address. And I live in NY. I never assume that only my gender has issues. Nor that only my race does. Nor even that only I do. I may not be sensitive to matters that seem quite trivial such as this though. I agree that …
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:15 PM
0

That may be so. However I can say, for my part, I did not use the term as a perjorative. I typically will use Ms. if I am unaware of a womans marital status. Being aware that she was married I used the social norm of Mrs. I think that it is symptomatic of the deeper issue of political correctness that people cannot simply use basic terminology in the off chance that someone will be offended by it. I can't speak for the others who used the title, they may have done so with mercenary intent. I did…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:09 PM
3

Even more mind boggling is that Tumbler and SRS have stated that the MRM response to Mrs. Rosens AMA was equivalent if not worse to the UofT protest. We do need to stay our emotions when in debate. They are desperately looking for a way to fobb off that disgusting display they were caught in.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:30 PM
2

Just curious. How is using proper title wrong? I can't say that it was being used in a "satirical" way. I used her full title and name in the same way I do when asking any professor or professional a question by text. Dr. Brow, Have person Xs test results gotten back to you? Mr. Smith, Please call to schedule an appointment. Mrs. Jones, Will you be attending the 4:30 meeting on Friday? This is the form taught by schools all over the world, for addressing someone in semi-formal format.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:20 PM
1

Very disappointed to see that Mrs. Rosen went on to blog about her AMA casting the questioners as "dudebros". Would seem that her more middle of the road answers were deliberately contrived to try to make the questioners look bad in her cut and paste blog. Shame really. Could have been a chance for a reasoned open dialog.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:17 AM
-1

She did dodge some of the tough ones. But in all I was pleased to see that she wasn't on board with most of the radical ideas of feminism and she seemed to think that an organized, mature MRM would be a good thing. She did have a few giggles with some SRS types though which is sad because it shows she would be fine with their behaviors as in-group members.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 10:11 PM
1

Actually they do more than that. They actually create some of mens issues. Such as the minefield that is sex and dating in a Feminist society.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:17 PM
0

My grieving process? That may be the most moronic response you could offer. Given that it would appear that your cheif issue is that some men are not greiving enough over this, and my stance is that grieving is counter productive at best. You keep trying to pied piper men down the road to having their own victim industry. Where they can hug eachother is a pit of hypoagency. The rest of us will put our efforts into utilizing mens reason and logic to realize a more just society.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:24 PM
0

In the sense that circ. is an outdated and cruel thing to do to a child I agree. But I do not agree that it serves any benefit at all for someone to cultivate a victim status over something that cannot be undone. Healing and mental health dictate that someone learn to live with and accept transgressions against themselves. This applies to all transgressions. What I was indicating to you in what you quoted was obvious. Your behavior in this issue is no different than that of an SRSer. So why not …
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:58 PM
3

I agree it probably is done by both sides. Sad really. But it wasn't the BSing that bugged me. It was the actual inability to understand the very simple cause and effects shown by the evidence. I think people being elected to solve problems should at the very least be able to understand what the problem is.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:14 PM
9

I try to believe that equality in representation is a good thing. I try to be positive about women holding political office. Then I watch this. And I see women diliberately derailing. I see women refusing to admit to information presented in studies done by their own department. I see women who can't even understand basic statistical mathmatics. In some instances they were deliberately blocking out what he was presenting. Other times though it appeared that they quite simply did not understand t…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:22 PM
2

Wow. That was a reaction and mentality I would expect in SRS or other juvenile echo chambers, not on a board claiming to be representative of a movement that holds its self to a higher standard. Plug your ears. Cut and paste a childish meme. And BENN me. I am disappointed and feel that if this is the direction MRM chooses to go we will not only fail to promote positive change but we will devolve into an SRS rad fem type of movement, deserving of the same ridicule and disrespect. Moreover I feel …
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:13 AM
1

Perhaps that was a poor choice of comparison. And while I don't believe that a precisely analogous comparison is needed to make the point I was making I will offer a second one which may seem closer in relation. A major flaw in the rape crisis centers and the domestic violence shelters is that rather than work with the victim in a constructive manner, they often fall to anti male rhetoric and victim-hood elevation. Meaning that, The victim of violence is conditioned not to recover and become str…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:36 AM
3

I'm not sure questioning the sanity of people who are ok with how they are is reasonable. From my perspective, for them to do otherwise they are embracing a victim status which is contrary to mental wellness. Saying, "hey I was circumcised at birth and there is nothing to be done about it." is rational. Being comfortable with ones own self image is healthy. As someone said here they are ok with their condition and choose to not carry on the tradition in the future with their children. That is th…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:09 AM
2

Did you upset some people somewhere? You have a nasty little downvote cloud over your head.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:57 PM
18

I'm not entirely sure why you are getting downvoted and called out here. As provided here in this pdf easily referenced in the side bar, as well as many other sourced and presented studies here in theis sub. We can see a notable discrepancy in male Vs. female conviction rates for similar crimes. Couple that knowledge with The fact that police, prosecutors and courts are incentivized to maximize their convition rates. And you get law enforcement and judiciary actively pursuing the more sure bet c…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:27 PM
5

Ohh I get it Blue. Having been observant of proxy violence since my youth inwhich my mother used my father as the diciplinarian in the family inorder to maintain her image as the kind and nurturing parent while destroying the bond between myself and my father. I have been keyed in to the nature of proxy violence for quite some time.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:42 PM
2

I put this into the same context that feminists put men. I hope I can explain this adequately. Radical lesbian feminists find themselves in competition with men for what they want (the affections and sexual favors of women). They are aware of the evolutionary predisposition of women to look for Provider/protectors in their mating selection. Now how do they improve their ability to attain that which they desire? Step one; Eliminate the male role as provider. This is acheived through equal opportu…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:38 PM
5

As a self respecting male I feel it my obligation to inflict the punnishment myself. Besides he has to know that his pain is result of his politically motivated betrayal of an entire gender.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:08 PM
3

I apologise if some gay MRAs take offense to the way I have to word this, and I hope that they all are aware that I do not believe they would ever behave in this way. I wonder how much credence would be given to a group of outspoken gay men who concocted the idea that All women were users looking to destroy men. That the only true man was a man who eschewed heterosexual relationships. That all heterosexual sex was an act in which evil women stole the devine genetic seed. What if angry gay men cr…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:03 PM
13

If I ever meet Joe Biden I will congratulate him on his acute political acumen. Over 50% of the population is women? Women vote more than do men in all age groups? Women tend to have a natural self interest which has already been cultivated by years of Feminist ideology? Time to draft a blatantly discriminatory bill which solely bennefitts those who WILL BE the most important group to gain traction with for future political success. Then I will kick him in the nuts. And pay a woman to claim he a…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:46 PM
3

Being an african slave on a sugar cane plantation in the caribean spending extended hours exposed to high temperatures and malaria performing heavy manual labor, was a lot more dangerous and harmfull than being a house slave in carolina mixing mint julips and looking after the masters kids. End result is SLAVERY IS WRONG. Severity does not factor in when discussing what is wrong on all levels.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 05:21 PM
2

I think it stems from. "when he goes to the barber it costs him $10 plus tip, When I go it costs $50 +. NOT FAIR!!" It is rooted in the same equal outcome that feminists love. They overlook that a cut at the barber shop takes about 5 minutes while their trip to the dresser can take an hour. Feminists have a way of overlooking all of the details to focuas only on the end result. I don't know why they do this.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:29 PM
3

I like how you think.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:32 PM
1

Makes more sense that would be the case. More traditions. You should watch the movie though, it is good and it does talk allot about the Hmong culture at points.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:06 PM
1

GET OFF MY LAWN Sory I had to say it. Reading through your post I assume that the situation for Hmong in America is not as it is depicted in Grand Torino. They expressed in that film that what is common is that the female children will be put through school while the boys are left without direction and often end up in gangs.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:10 PM
1

In part I believe it to be tied to women. Our culture puts the feminine on a pedestal and ignores or outright condemns the masculine, especially in youth. What you get is more typical female behaviors coming out in young men looking for some acceptance by society.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:29 AM
2

I work in medical. I worry for these guys. Yea they are cut but a lot of young people with heart issues and getting illnesses that they should fight off easy. It is like they are all on the surface but their health isn't on par with the external.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 02:23 AM
2

Watched a good documentary on it some time back. And cant help but notice that kids these days are friggin ripped. I was in good shape in my day, still am but I wasn't putting four or more days in at the gym at 16.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:36 AM
3

Thanks for that. I figured as much. Media stereotypes are always a problem. All of the Gay men I have known were just of the average Joe type. Neither fem nor masc. Except one and he was different in many many ways lol.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:45 PM
1

I'm going to sound like an idiot here. But why is it that many gay men are attracted to efeminant men as opposed to masculine men? Since masculinity in essence defines maleness. It just seems odd. Gay men are attracted to men that do not fit what is typically seen as male. Not judging or anything and I know personal tastes vary greatly. Just looking to understand better so I wont seem an idiot in the future.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 08:59 PM
7

The DOJ has an active interest in prosecuting cases that will stick, resulting in both revenue and high convition rates which get them incentive bonuses. Since societal bias and feminist interference lead to low convition rates of females it becomes a net financial loss to prosecute women as opposed to the gain of prosecuting males. So they release statements like this to give the apearance that bias and monetary gain are not behind the discrepancy of arrest rates. They can simply say "Of course…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:49 PM
3

This has been on the rise for the last decade. Are people actually surprised? The current style tred for guys clothing is friggin skinny jeans for gods sake! The amount of suffering men go through right under societies nose is sickening. And no I do not think that without first blasting the entrenched feminists in our nations humanities departments both in university and research and treatment facilities, we will ever see men get proper treatment for these issues.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:40 PM
9

I'm glad they made this film. I predict that in a year or so, when it hits DVD, The rad fems in the womyns studies departments will be having pajama party movie nights to watch this "rape revenge fantasy" film. Which will be yet another example of the enherent misandry and violence in these people for MRAs to point out to the undecided.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:25 PM
4

In the past, the practice of mandating doses of amphetamine to a certain group of men was used. It was done by the nazis on their SS troops. And look how focused they were /s Seriously stop force feeding these kids narcotics.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:18 PM
5

Feminist infiltrated psychology and crisis intervention employs the same principals of operation as does the corner crack dealer. "Get em once and ya got em for life" They do little to help with actual healing. What they do is create a broken person, in perpetual need, to keep the demand for services rendered on the up-tick.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 03:13 PM
4

Hate to break it to ya bud, but that is what your average run of the mill prostitute looks like. So If you think you are gonna hit the mean streets some night with a sawbuck and some wood to go with it and end up testing your suspencion in an ally with Julia Roberts in a tank top. You may need to turn off your tv.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:38 PM
5

I actively blame all of you for Pelosi.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:18 PM
5

this is a sane way of reacting.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 10:39 PM
1

I still hold that it is a shitty name for something that is nothing new and has been lived with successfully since the dawn of civilization.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:08 PM
3

That's my point. Rape culture is taking established mating and courtship practices and distorting them into a predesignated system by which women can be victimized. In that way it simply becomes a self serving creation of feminism to perpetuate female victim status.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:50 PM
1

Ok point taken. But are women not simultaneously setting themselves up as the sexual gatekeepers with practices like; Hypergamy Creep shaming Girl power essentially all womens dating advice media Princess mentality Holding the sole rights to all things reproductive. and many many other prevalent female opinions and practices. Essentially what you are saying is that female sexual selectivity and some males feeling shunned by the criteria set forth by that selectivity is the fertile grounds from w…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:44 PM
1

Is it men or women who set themselves up as the gate keepers? Women have always set themselves up as the gate keepers. And men have always born the burden of courtship. The only way that you can turn that paradigm into the concept of a Rape culture is by positing that all sex is rape. Since the interplay of that existing system is set up to have the end result of consensual sex. The same dynamic between the sexes exists in just about every mammal species in this planet. Do lions live in a rape c…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:10 PM
4

That was just wrong lol. But yea in general Singin' in the Rrain would be preferable to humming the Jaws theme
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:04 PM
1

No. Just because victim blaming exists does not make it a systemic enablement or those who would commit rape. Present to me evidence that more rapes happen as the result of one sheriff in canada saying that women shouldnt dress this way if they don't want to get raped.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:58 PM
1

That is selective understanding. Do western law enforcement agencies sometimes put an emphasis on what women can do to reduce their risk of being raped? Yes. They also investigate and prosecute those people who commit rape. They are just aware that telling a rapist not to rape is as effective in preventing rape as preaching veganism to a tiger. Rapists know it is wrong already, They don't give a fuck. Telling men in general that rape is wrong is pointless because the vast majority of men already…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:54 PM
1

What I call it is society. There are misguided fools with every opinion under the sun out there. As an individual personality, Adolf Hitler was the most remarkable man in human history. No man had a greater sense of vision, That is cut from a neo nazi web page. Someone has that opinion. Should I now believe that we are living in a white supremacist culture?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:49 PM
1

I am aware Of that. Feel free to go through my post history if you want to know more detail, but I was the victim of female on male rape. Also I was sexually abused by a female as a young child. And I am very aware that people treat those things as if they do not happen. This is not evidence of a rape culture to me. It is evidence of male disposability and female hypoagency. Women cannot be abusers because they lack the agency required to victimize others. And men cannot be victims because it sc…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:40 PM
1

I agree that a very few men have made statements such as that. I will put it this way. I have heard an equal number of morons say that sexual relationships with horses is an acceptable behavior in society, as I have heard men say that a girl in a tube top deserves to be raped. I do not believe we are living in a horse rape culture. Selecting the words of an outlaying minority and conflating that into an entire cultural opinion is dishonest. Also there is a difference between the statement of "a …
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:34 PM
1

That is not an example of active rape culture. What that is is an example of societal acceptance of misandry and the disposability of men. Both of which do exist.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:23 PM
1

Ok then. I have also studied the beliefs of Jehovas witnesses. And often when I am confronted by one, I politely express my opinion of it's teachings and my belief that it is false or at least no anything I personally ascribe to. They still preach and hand me the booklet. No different here.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:20 PM
1

That is still arguing that it exists. Victim blaming may happen on a limited basis. Some men may say moronic things like "dress this way you are asking for it". Most victim blaming I have seen comes from women though. Ant the attack against victim blaming is directed toward men. If it is true that victim blaming is a key perpetrator of an active rape culture in modern society, and it is also true that feminism has made it a personal goal to fight this, Why do we not see feminists attacking other…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:15 PM
1

I have read about it. I have heard it's arguments.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:10 PM
1

Rape culture does not exist. What exists is the perceived victim blaming observed by those who are determined to define themselves as victims.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:05 PM
1

Well then. If you have some deeper understanding of the rhetoric of rape culture why don't you offer your own, more knowledgeable refutation of or argument against it? Do that instead of solely picking apart the arguments made by those MRAs who you feel have an inferior knowledge?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:03 PM
1

Having a working knowledge of a thing and believing in a thing are different. I will ask you this straight up. Do YOU believe that there is a rape culture present in the world?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:52 PM
1

Well then you need to dig a bit deeper into MRA.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:50 PM
1

No it is what some MRAs do when a feminist concern troll comes in to preach rape culture to them. Many of us know what the teachings of rape culture are and we have found it lacking. We have refuted the concept on all fronts and utilized many methods and types of argument to do so. So yea we aren't very receptive to having it preached to us as a response.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:13 PM
2

Yea a little cough or whistling a few bars to a song in your head. something subtle.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:09 PM
1

Of course they are! "Rape culture" is just as important a tool to feminists in maintaining their victim status and pointing their finger at the men as is patriarchy. And it is also just as made up and full of shit as Patriarchy theory. But they will always protect those two tropes because they work so well.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:08 PM
1

For your analogy to work, it would have to be know it all women lecturing men with bad advice and/or advice that doesn't apply So essentially every chant, poster, memo, and forced lecture that leaks out of the womens center on every campus in the country? You see the trouble here is not that you want us to understand their opinion, the trouble is that you share their opinion. You are preaching "Rape culture" to us. WE don't buy it so peddle the lie to those who are grasping for anything to help …
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:04 PM
1

Our arguments are dismissed because the feminist listener has plugged their ears and is yelling "NANANANANA!" As I said MRA presents their argument in every way between flat sourced statistics and studies, and pointing to articles where misandry is obvious, and yes a few poorly connected analogies. Non of those methods have any effect on the opinions of feminists. They are acolytes of the feminist dogma! Their opinion can only be directed by the great and powerful vagina, and even then only if t…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:58 PM
1

By this point we know or can anticipate what they are saying. It always the same denial followed by victim status reaffirmation followed by shaming rhetoric followed by recitation of the lies and ultimately open hostility. Is a slightly off analogy a sub par way of making our point? Sure. But right here on this subreddit alone we provide all of the studies, statistical findings, blatant feminist quotes revealing their true nature, etc etc. And little of it makes any change. So why not use a less…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:40 PM
1

No they where telling the truth. I saw them doing it. I was there. We actually had a "Trip the halls" day right before Christmas break. Walking from class to class that day was like getting in line for a snack booth at a Phish concert. Nothing but pupils the size of diner plates staring back at you, and giggles.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:33 PM
1

It is. Men are more than willing to give advice to each other no matter how hard to hear that advice may be. Take the issue of false rape accusation. Sure men get upset by and at the women who perpetrate these crimes and at the feminist dogma behind it, but we also tell the guys "stop thinking with your dick!" and "You KNOW that in this environment, hooking up while drunk is dangerous." This is because, unlike for women, it is socially acceptable to critique a man, even if that man ended up lear…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:28 PM
16

I just think that is over doing it. But I am a New Yorker so for me personal space is not feeling a breeze on my leg when the dude next to me on the subway farts.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:24 AM
7

Dude it happens a lot. Hell my sophomore year I think about half of my grade (about 1000 kids) were doing acid or coke. 75% were smoking pot and 85% were drinking. Not saying it is good but not shocking nor something to judge.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:19 AM
14

Hi GOGO, (hope it is ok that I shortened your name) First, Richard has a fitting name. He is a dick. What he did was WRONG. You had every right to the emotional and physical responses that you had as a result of his disgusting violation of you. Second, When I was 14 years old I went to a party with friends and some new people I had never met. A girl at that party took an interest in me and asked my friends about me. I had no interest in her at all, so I avoided her throughout the night so as not…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 07:08 AM
68

I have been on both sides. I have been suddenly startled by someone passing me by in the dark. That instant jump you get from being startled is less than comfortable, but it is far from disturbing enough to warrant the entire population observing some hyper-vigilant respect for protocol when out walking. You see, I have also startled someone at night in just this way. I was walking down a semi dark street, headphones on, in no particular hurry. And along my way I came across a woman walking. her…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:01 AM
27

Someone has a well developed rape fantasy, doesn't she? You squashed her dream! Interracial rape fantasy cock blocker!
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:51 AM
1

Yes. Just repeating the same flawed logical conclusion over and over hoping that what she is saying will become less illogical through that repetition.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:45 AM
4

Pain numbing medications are typically administered well sooner than 2 hours in. I didn't watch the original video. Did they start the simulated contractions 1 hour apart as is often the case for actual labor. Or did they have these men put up with the continual contractions which come with the imminent birth? If they did the latter, contractions at that rate of frequency usually don't last that long as the child is pushed out in that time. And again at the height of contractions the woman is ty…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:23 AM
1

We give this advice to each other often. It goes like this "Don't stick your dick in crazy"
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:01 AM
1

Stop trying to explain to us what their dreamed up "rape culture" is all about.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:59 AM
1

And again if Feminists get what they want a drunk fucker (if male) is a criminal just as much as a drunk driver.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:57 AM
1

The likening of the decision to have sex with the commission of a crime is exactly what is done by radfems when they say a man who has sex while drunk is committing rape. They are deciding to have sex with a seemingly consenting partner they are not deciding to commit the crime of rape.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:54 AM
5

"kthnksbai" The problem is not so much sexism as it is immaturity and mental defect. The all to common Infantilized modern girl. All ego and bluster with no substance. Best to chuck any association to this type. They are nothing but toxic, and the only way they will change is if they are shunned and shamed.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:40 AM
6

SaraSays has to be an anti vaccine nut. She uses the same logical fallacy. again and again and again in hopes that eventually it won't be retarded. Similar argument; Bonobos don't use sexual promiscuity to prevent infanticide because bonobos don't have infanticide. Vaccines don't prevent small pox because nobody has small pox. I wonder if she would say that Rape is not prevented because rapes don't happen.... If we ever have a world like that.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:53 PM
1

For now. The thing about the kleptocracy is, that it royally pisses off a lot of people. And not just any people but decent hard working honest people. At least in American history, when that particular class gets pissed enough things change and they change hard.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:51 AM
1

In a sense. However, manipulation is a tool used by toddlers and very small children. Crocodile tears when they come home late to dinner or come home with bad school marks. Tantrums in shops until they get that toy or sweet that caught their eye. I would say you are right that the skill fits the Kleptocracy, but does that mean these women are more suited to fill the roles or that these women are the ones shaping it to suit their strengths?
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:11 AM
4

In all honesty that is not so. Yes a "Life" sentence sounds dramatic and bad. However as the prosecutor pointed out and statistics would show, most "Life " sentences equate to ten years. Which is far less than the 70 years served by the defendant in the case the defense lawyer sited, and half the sentence of 20 years for murder. She was playing on words and going with the rare high end figure to skew the opinion of the judge. I won't comment on whether current sentences as set by the law are jus…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:32 AM
2

"Your honor, the legislature never intended for someone like my client to be tried or convicted for a crime such as this." Whaaaaaat? "Why is that?" Thank you your honor! The crying at the end? Making the perpetrator out to be the victim? If I had been the judge I would have said. "go out and get the evidence for the crimes committed against your defendant.' Arrest those who abused your defendant.' And I will see them face a fair trial for their crimes as well."
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:23 AM
1

That they do. And to my obsevation it seems they do so even younger now than they did in my generation. Although secondary sex traits are more easilly confirmed in females than males so I can't say that boys are not maturing early these days as well.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 09:05 PM
13

I grew up surrounded by the repeated notion that girls were "more mature" than boys. In grade school I figured, well it doesn't seem so but ok. Then in middle school I noticed that the "more mature" girls had bedrooms full of stuffed animals and threw tantrums all the time. I was told that girls were "more emotional" than boys so the tantrums were not a sign of immaturity. Then came highschool, The girls still had fits and still had rooms full of stuffed toys, and threw on top of that a strong w…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:30 PM
3

I agree. I'm not religious or some overly moral nutter, but I find myself at a loss to understand why so many people have become simple materialistic ass hats. Happily I surround myself with old friends who see the world as I do. Occasionally one of us even manages to find a SO who escaped the princess trap.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:28 PM
3

You make the mistake of neglecting that the "women can have it all" often comes at the expense of "the collective". These things are not mutually exclusive. Feminists are simply female supremacists. It matters not to them where it all comes from just so long as they have it. Edit: Both feminism and marketing consumerism utilize the fact that western cultures raise women to be spoiled brats quite often. Not all of them of course but enough of them to go out there and spread their spoiled entitled…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:11 AM
0

Quote me where I said ALL. Your idiotic inference is not my idiotic statement.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 04:01 AM
0

This is not a scientific journal. I need not perform a double blind for each and every coment I make here. So sod off.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:22 PM
-1

Financial dependance on men and trading up because one feels they are not compensated enough by their current spouse? yea exactly what is discussed here.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:05 PM
0

Au-pairs and live in nannies do get paid well. They also are typically expected to be educating the kids, often in second language skills. They also are hired by people in upper economic strata. And the wives of people in upper economic strata also get more benefitts than do those in lower strata.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:03 PM
0

Not saying that. However those who argue that housewives are uncompensated laborers need to face the fact that they are in fact compensated.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:06 PM
-1

The average going rate for a cleaning service in my area is $50-$100 per cleaning dependant on size of the house. Most people employ the service for between one and two cleanings per week or in some cases one cleaning every other week. This totals to between $100 and $800 dollars per month. Some how I think that the average housewife spends more than that on her own personal non household needs out of the joint account each month. Not to mention that out of that joint account all of the costs of…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:15 PM
5

By placing disproportionate value on sexual desirability and new and exciting experience, alongside with devaluing personal aspects such as dedication and respect, we cultivate the environment of infidelity. Cultural obsession with excitement and materialism...Isn't it funny how it leads to a lot of hard feelings and broken relationships.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:02 PM
1

No only a person who speaks in generalities would ascribe one ideology to another ideology. Traditionalism crosses party lines and both parties have both traditionalist members and non traditionalist. Since feminism and its members tend to fall onto the liberal side of the devide I suppose I can justify saying that liberals are feminists.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:29 PM
1

Your ridiculous bias prevents any level of open discourse. Since I am a conservative who sees value in many people having many ideas and thoughts I'll just leave you to yours.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:51 PM
1

Atheist libertarians are not conservatives. The majority of conservatives I know are well aware that the traditionallist "wife barefoot in the kitchen" ideal is long dead. Economically unfeasable ideas like that can only be held by the very wealthy which includes both left and right leaning persons. I know just as many stay at home moms who vole blue as I do who vote red.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:28 PM
1

Being accepted by traditionalist conservative extremists and being accepted by the majority of conservatives are two different things. Just as being accepted at a DNC convention and being accepted at a marxist meeting are two different things. You are guilty of believing the polarity lie perpetrated by media bias. Most people actually find themselves in a middle ground leaning one direction or the other. Moderates tend to be quieter and as such go unnoticed while the nutters both left and right …
/r/MensRights15/01/13 09:57 PM
1

How is that generalizing working out for ya? Keep spouting the typical liberal "all conservatives are litteraly Archie Bunker/Hittler" junk.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:49 PM
4

She seems like she is sexually controlling you. And she likely is getting off on your negative response. Gives her the feeling of taking what she wants and empowering her. Take that away from her. Next time she does it groan and dry-hump her hand. Pretend the utmost pleasure in what she is doing. Hell even place her hand on it under the table when out to dinner. She will stop when it becomes about your pleasure not hers. Or if you don't want to play games before ending this. Just end it.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:28 PM
1

Granted she was in a hostile environment, however, she did a horrible job defending a stance that is rooted in factual data. This is the problem with pundits of any kind. They grab the numbers that back them or are inflamatory and they do nothing to understand those numbers. Anyone truely familliar with the issue and the numbers and studies could have calmly shot down all of the cackling by simply sticking to their facts. Maybe turn the question back once in a while? Like "Hey you don't agree wi…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 02:24 PM
1

A bit of that yes.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:45 PM
1

Actually no. They know to give reduced rates to those with the higher purchasing power. Pandering = sales
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:48 PM
0

No they charge the same on individual plans and less if they are an added participant on their husbands plan.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 05:04 PM
3

Where does one with a bachelors degree in psychology with a minor in womens studies get a job? Many of the workers in both DV and Rape crisis are exactly these women. Also many of them have some close ties to a victim or have been a victim themselves. Often their judgement is tainted, so a reaction like this could happen. I have known women in that business who were very biased aganst men. It is a problem not just for male victims but for female victims as well. Driving the idea that men are abu…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:10 PM
4

15 feet.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:47 PM
1

You could link the sport analogy to olympic type sports if you like. Say the top sprinters from each country doing a relay together. Or like the US basketball team combing the whole pro league for competitors to work together. And one could argue that the conflicts between western capitalism and eastern comunism was a two sided struggle. Anyhow, it doesn't adress the issues. The mouth pieces of feminism have managed to all but coopt education in the US as well as demonize men in the eyes of law …
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:57 PM
1

Exactly. Many pink team members say they want to help out the blue team too. Meanwhile other pink team players are setting up obsticals for the blue team. If a combination of the nice pinks and the blues can push those bad pinks off the track I think we can all swap to one color jersey. My vote is for a dark purple as that color can be flattering to all complexions and genders.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:45 PM
2

I was saying it in jest to set asside the possibility of "hormones" effecting their work.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:07 PM
1

But what do we do when one teams project hinders the progress of another teams project? Because the pink team keeps pushing through things that are directly detrimental to the blue team.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:06 PM
1

Not gonna say it's right. But also won't get on board with marxism cause that has not proven to be very fun.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:20 AM
1

You are likely right. One of those weeds we never should have let grow
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:19 AM
1

To a devout marxist? Sure that definition fits. Just like to a Skin Head the Tea Party are a bunch of hippies. I think that The 60s hippie socialist movement became more capitalist because the hippies grew up and got jobs.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:19 PM
6

I would give you more than one up-vote if I could. Rape crisis counceling for women has gone far astray.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:16 PM
1

Yes the current left wing party of the united states. I'm not talking about Maoists or Left wing socialists in Spain.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:29 PM
1

I believe that to be influenced more by self interestedness than and fiscal or political motivation. What I see is that feminism will and has used whatever tool they can to obtain more for themselves. They have done so predominantly through socialist programs and their support of the left.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:58 PM
1

I'll watch it later when I get the chance. I'll comment after. I do not agree though. You are as you vote in this structure. And they are not voting conservative. Nor are their platforms and initiatives remotely conservative. They are just selfish which is a trait they share with far more people than traditional conservatives.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:46 PM
1

No the reason why modern feminists embrace narcissism and individualism is because they are solopsystic and selfish. They still want collectiveism they just want to be the top beneficiaries of said collectivism. They are pushing for a support state "for all but mostly me" They are not pushing for individualism. Equal opportunity employment is not based on individualism. Nor are other things feminists push for. Essentially feminists approach collectivism as queen bees. They are all about socialis…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:40 PM
2

Consumerism and capitalism are financial terms and not the basis of political ideologies. Assigning consumerism as a right wing ideology is moronic. Are you telling me that members of the left wing political party do not own corporations and represent the common man? Are you that diluted? Stop drinking the blue coolaid. Again bottom line is that Feminists are a branch of the left. Just because they are also selfish mony grubbing hypacrites does not make them a branch of conservatism. It just mak…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:20 PM
6

I'm glad to help. I won't suggar coat it man. This may very well be a loosing fight for you. I have personally tried to help more than one person in my life with the same issues. The predominant result was not what one would hope for. You need to remember that your mothers recovery from her past is on her and her alone. Do not take responsibility for any failure. As they say "you can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make it think ;)" I hope your mother heals and that it leads to a better li…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:14 PM
1

That is not even remotely true. You are conflating personal interest and greed with a political affiliation. Al Gore has a personal jet. He is decidedly capitalist. All politicians are capitalists that does not make them right wing. Since financial self interest is present in both parties wide scale it is not a defining characteristic of either party or left-right alighnment. What differentiates them are fiscal and social conservatism vs liberalism. Feminism supports; Big government-Liberal Hevi…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:10 PM
3

I would say they are Liars to be less kind. They claim to be socialist and for the people but are not. What you say is true they are just capitalists but they say they are not. Essentially they play the game. They pull in the votes of the people on the lower rungs with promises of equality for all and prosperity to the poor with no intent to do any of that. Point is that Feminism is alligned with the left and the Democrat party, whether you think they do so due to being duped or not does not mak…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:54 PM
1

I wouldn't dream of it. Every sub group has their issues and they have validity. However it is called Triage to use a medical term. We need to address the gunshot victim before me deal with the case of the Flu.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:50 PM
5

What your mother needs to learn but likly you will not be able to teach her is that she has perpetuated her own victimhood through bad choices. Some will take that as a critique against your mother but I assure you it is not. She was abused young. That abuse conditioned her to victimhood. Her abuser damaged her self worth, thus assuring that she would unwittingly be drawn into relationships with more abusers. She feels she deserves it in a way or at least that she does not deserve better. That i…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:46 PM
0

Again how does feminism vote? They predominantly vote Democrat and are likely registered as such. There may be some who throw their vote away to the socialist ticket but not many. So yes feminism is predominantly Democrat. As to Leftism and Democrat party. The leftists are not voting for Republicans.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:25 PM
1

All well and good. And I agree. Should we feed the person having Mac N cheese for the 5th night in a row first or the one having to scavenge the trash? I am not promoting a victim olympics when I say that the bigger problem should be addressed first.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:22 PM
4

Ask top feminists which way they vote. Seriously tired of people trying to deny that Feminism is totally a left wing sub group. Just admit it people! I own to the fact that WBC and white supremecists probably vote Republican, And I still call those sub groups idiots. I don't try to pretend that Neo Nazis are going to vote for Obama because I want their stupidity distanced from my chosen political alighnment.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:08 PM
9

All of the female senators we have can barely remember the last time they menstruated. They are also batshit crazy. "We won't know whats in the bill untill we pass it." -Nancy Pelosi At least those Lady Senators are looking to make changes to benifit each and every US citizen.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:02 PM
7

While you are correct in what you say here, I would like to point out a few things. 1) That quote from that politician. Yes it was absolutely moronic. It was a gross misinterpretation of biological actions. Females under severe stress and frequent trauma often experience a period of infertility. It is a natural response developed to assure survival. However being raped is not quite on par with sever malnutrition or being in an environment over-populated by predators. So that turdnugget politico …
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:56 PM
6

Banning advertising would potentially be the game changing event that leads to economic stability. Corporations invest billions in ads. Take that out of the equation and perhapse prices could go down and consumers can pick what they like based on trial and error combined with monetary value. Hmmm go figure. Wont happen.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:46 PM
17

It is implied that the men in those comercials are happy. Since they are lucky enough to be allowed to be near to the imaculate and gorgeous super women, their happiness is assured.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:43 PM
7

I wouldn't reccomend PETA. That is like calling the Marines when the Army invades your house. ASPCA NY should be your best bet.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:44 PM
1

Are you slow or just angry? Defending what feminism should have been and was meant to be is a far cry from defending what it became. Guys like you are what will some day be considdered the Andrea Dworkins of the MRA movement. You should be proud.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:22 PM
3

Save the meme. Saying someone is or is not true to a set of beliefs is not something that will or should go away.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 11:47 PM
2

Well Iraq is probably the worst place to be deployed in terms of possible hook-ups. Thanks for serving man.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:24 PM
6

I'll have to read that. However what she is as a woman is what feminism claimed was their end goal. Feminism rallied to become like her; educated, self sufficient, self determinant, and EQUAL. Sadly that has not been the outcome.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:37 PM
8

Erin Pizzey is the end result which True Egalitarian Feminism is meant to produce. A strong intelligent woman who can envision, develope, and carry out a goal. One who stands on her own two feet even when the ground shakes beneath them. She fights for true equality and seeks that through studying the truth. Quite glad to see her and I look forward to hearing her thoughts.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:26 PM
1

My point exactly. I was safe, not because I was physically stronger than any possible assailant, but rather because I conducted myself in a way that did not make me a target.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:28 AM
3

It is an interesting faith. Not one common to being an interest for outsiders.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 05:16 PM
3

Yea and Hindus don't wear turbans.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 05:15 PM
1

That is why I said it has to come from both sides. But the current ideal put forth especially on school campuses is decidedly one sided. It refuses to apply reason to both sides of the equation and as such it will never be effective in the least. Slutty clothes are not a factor. Slutty behavior... well I'm not so sure. I can speak for myself. I am a restrained and respectful person. Also I have been in long term relationships for the better part of my life. I have never had a harder time with be…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:59 AM
1

Studies have shown that dress has little to no effect upon the likelihood of being raped. If women are feeling constrained in what they where it is not coming from a real and true escalation of danger for them. I do believe some young women could dress more modestly but only because it seems more dignified and shows a higher level of self respect. I risk getting mugged if I get sloppy drunk and wander off in a bad town. So I either A)don't get that smashed or B0 stay with friends where I am safe…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:31 AM
1

You see that is the problem. Edit their behavior? People always have to edit their behavior in all societies for numerous reasons. That is why within societies you have sub-groups we call friends or cliques. A place where you have a safe zone to let it all run loose. People should not assume the world is their safe zone. The only way to achieve such a thing is through a police state. Like with being unambiguous. Why? Why not be frank with people and say NO I'm just not interested. It is not that…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 06:57 AM
3

Well honestly. Most. Hindus are not exactly a rarity in the US. Maybe in way out rural places there may be some folks who never met a Hindu. But America is a huge melting pot of nationalities. Did you know that Minnesota has the highest population of Somali people outside of Somalia? What I'm saying is, that a person in the US essentially has to be willfully ignorant not to know people of different cultural background. And yes some are willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 06:50 AM
2

Sigh. Don't try to bait me with this victim blaming nonsense. I have known and helped many female rape victims. I was abused and raped by women in my youth. I am more than sensitive to the nature of the crime and its effects on the victim. I won't be shamed with rhetoric. How should women change their behavior to stop rape? Well for one, think. Understand that as a human being you are vulnerable and that it is your mind and your choices that make you less vulnerable. If you want to party do so w…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 01:32 AM
2

Again you are in error in what you say there. I'm sorry and I hope you will not take offense, but the way you see this is not healthy. What you say is correct, rape is more a crime of power and dominance than one of sexual gratification. However, a rapist does not gain that desired sense of power by never getting the opportunity to rape you. The rapist has to have a victim to gain that. You cannot be the victim of a crime that has never happened to you. The rapist is not sexually dominating you …
/r/MensRights01/01/13 01:12 AM
1

Not sure any of these thing will be solved globally. I tend to like the approach of a molecular chemist. Start with the smallest part and eventually it spreads. So essentially for men, be respectful to women and yourself. For women, be respectful to men and yourself. If the majority of people are personally responsible for themselves and respectful of others it makes a huge impact. The thinking that we can end crimes like rape without changing the behaviors of both men and women is like thinking…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:56 AM
1

People like me?
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:40 AM
4

Not gonna argue most of what you said here since there are too many generalities. For each woman like you, who takes precautions and is vigilant and responsible, I can point to at least one woman who is sloshed out of her gourd at some bar. What I will mention is your final statement. (because guess what? Then the criminal won). That is not true. It may be true about a terrorist whos goal is to terrorize. However, a rapists goal is to rape, a muggers is to mug and a murderers is to murder. So by…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:34 AM
1

Actually the ideology of. Look at how shitty we're having it, so you should shut up and be glad about what you have... Is pretty abundant around the world and is widely accepted. Ever heard "First world problems!" Or maybe "donate now!" or how about wealth redistribution and socialism? all are based upon the notion that the haves should look at the have-nots and not only quit bitching but also to try to help out those in far greater need.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:28 AM
9

Yea just seems like you may be surrounded by an ignorant circle. I have a few Hindu friends and they tell me they never really saw much blow-back from bigots. The Sikh guys though... yea they saw some idiots. If it makes you feel better you can change your percentage to 70% of morons. Or "I know too many local idiots who think.etc" America is not quite the ignorant gun toting wild west it gets branded..
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:42 PM
10

I live in NY. I helped with clean up and recovery after the fact an a K9 handler. Yea still never heard it blamed on Hindus. Towel heads? maybe but people that use the term use it as a general slur for anyone brown from Mid-east through to Pakistan and India. However most even of those don't apply the term to Hindus as they don't wear turbans of any kind.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:19 PM
16

Do you live in the US? I know approximately ZERO Americans who believe Hindus did 911.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:55 PM
14

He has the look of a man who has been subjected to politely turning his head away, as a woman he desperately wants changes her clothes in front of him as if he were a eunuch. He likely is a sensitive and artsey guy who has found a girl he is completely smitten with. Sadly that girl is a university rad-fem who sees him as a pet not a man. While this guy has no right to assume he is somehow owed the physical affections of said woman, said woman has no right to drag this man around by his cock with…
/r/MensRights31/12/12 06:48 PM
2

I would agree with you IF it were not the case that, in general, the misogynist comments are downvoted and argued against by the majority within the community. Where as the majority "Good" feminists are not going out of their way to denounce the extremists within their movement. Any movement is subject to take-over by extremists. However, MRM has been doing a pretty good job of policing its self while feminism is not. I will believe that the majority of feminists are on page for equality when I …
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:33 PM
3

Of course MRA is a reactionary movement. If things were equal no movement would be needed at all. I hope one day we won't need to have an MRA because we won't have a feminism pushing for supremacy with men picking up the tab. One day we may only need egalitarians keeping the outlying nutters at bay.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:34 PM
1

Not that it was a feminist film. Men have always been both good and bad, just as women are. And men have always jabbed at, poked fun of, and when needed outright condemned the less worthy acts of men. Women used to do the same and some still do. What feminism has brought to the table is 1. refusal to acknowledge the good in men. 2. refusal to acknowledge the bad in women. Creating a world of sex based class dominance through the guise of victim-hood.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 02:44 AM
2

I'm sure that happens. But this case? This case was a twisted con job perpetrated through the use of racial and gender politics. Planned and carried out by sick people.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:55 PM
3

Do you even know the case? She planned the entire thing with her BF ahead of time. It was not a ditch effort to get out of a grounding for breaking curfew. The girl had her BF beat her blody, she stripped naked, smeared herself with human feces, and crawled into a quickie mart wrapped in a garbage bag. You relly think that was some sort of "I don't want to get grounded" deal? The entire thing was contrived as an act of vengeance against local officials and an attempt to gain notoriety and money.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:24 PM
6

This whole thing went down in my home town. There were riots in the street at the time, the men charged lost everything even after being found not guilty. I remember just how insane this place went as a result of this case and can see the damage it did with my own eyes.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:15 PM
0

This is the result when a sensible idea gains traction with teens and the semi-deficient. This is a BS post contrived by a penis bearing version of an SRS child. God I hope this sub isn't on its way to becoming r/atheism or r/srs
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:10 PM
1

You are half right. The "Woman=Good" existed prior to feminism. However the "Men=Bad" did not. It was "Woman=Good (in this way) Men=Good (in this way)" Both good for different reasons.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:15 PM
1

either in a relationship, or a friend-in-a-bar type of date-rape situation. Why do you guys think that rapes like this occur more frequently? Do you agree that this happens more often to women than to men? Why/why not? It likely does happen more to women than men. Why? That is quite complex. Honestly I feel it is a societal thing. Men are shamed for sexual failure, women shamed for promiscuity. Men have more societal pressure to return to their peer group with a story of prowess and success. The…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:23 AM
1

Those both seem like good places. I'll have to travel there when I can and have a look.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 10:13 PM
1

Winter is too long up there. I'm in the north east of the states and I just dont think I want more dark and cold than I already get. You are correct about trending far left or far right being equally annoying in general. Just to me the far left grates on me more because it tends to be all talk no action. ehh whatever. I have stomped around up there quite a bit though. and maybe my image is tainted since I have mostly seen Quebec, and Toronto. Haven't seen places like Manitoba which I hear is mor…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:24 PM
16

she took him to hospital where she claimed he’d fallen down stairs. Finally equality! Women are now using the same lame ass lies to cover their abuses that they heard attributed to male abusers. Guys really need to stop cutting passes for cute women.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:31 PM
3

This quote comes from the coments on the article page. I read a book that said that 10% of men are raising children that aren't theirs and don't know it. Honestly, I understand the biological motivations of a woman who partners with a good father/provider but sleeps with a man with great genes and passes it off as man #1s. They often don't match up and it's just evolutionary instincts to want the best of both worlds. So by this logic the reversal of a man keeping a wife at home, a woman who cook…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:49 PM
1

Ahh Canada. If you are in one of the cities...my condolences. Beautiful places full of art and other distractions but ostentaciously liberal and a bit too clique driven. I do like Canada though. Me being an outdoor type.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:15 PM
2

Well being desperate may not be a choice. However dwelling on it is. If you think about it all the time it gets worse. The gaming world does tend to be too introverted for socializing so yea you will have to find other interests as well. If you are interested in rifles etc. Look into working for a manufacturer. Maybe go to school for engeneering. You seem like an introvert, which is fine, many important people in history were introverts. You do have to broaden your horizons though. It is fine to…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:21 PM
1

Why don't you have friends? Hell I am not a big fan of most people either. Besides Skyrim and other games what do you like? Or what do you think you would like? Me, I do outdoor stuff. Hike Kayack etc. so I go out and do those things. Started alone but in places where I saw other people doing them. That is how I met new people and made friends. They were already into the same stuff as me so we found we had other interests in common as well. This is just a stepping stone. Once you get out and mak…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:57 PM
2

I know you are a span troll, but. Honestly, more commenters and members on this sub actively push for equalizing some of the problems faced by men today. And not the problem of how much createine is the right amount and which day should be leg day at the gym. The majority of the posts that come off like bitches are ones like yours. The members here do research and collect stats and studies to support not only strong arguments against opposition in the world but also to help men come to terms wit…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:51 PM
1

Simple. Be the least desperate one. Seriously though, Do some entertaining stuff with your male friends. Those memories will last longer than any of the ones you spend in bed with a lady. And once you do move forward into life with a woman and maybe kids etc. you will never get another time like you have now. You will miss it.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 08:40 PM
3

Why did this make top story? Differing sexual comfort zones are something for individuals to decide for themselves. If two people are not compatible it tends to sort itself out eventually. Do I think non-reciprocation is rude? Sure but he can move on or stop. Do I think it is right to demand this of his girl? Absolutely not. It makes her cry for gods sake. If someone posted a link on here about a woman demanding oral from a BF who sobbs as he goes down we would by no means say he should man up. …
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:44 PM
2

What? Between the ball game on the TV the porn on the computer and the fact that I am drinking beer through my Big Mac on the couch in my dirty underwear, I find this study confusing. I'm going to think about it while I wash break all of the dishes and clean shrink all of the clothes in the laundry. I think I have kids to pick up from school but they can wait till halftime. What was all this about again? NM I'll ask my wife to explain it to me later.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:39 PM
1

Well, go to a game convention. Find a woman who likes Skyrim. Then skip the other part. Or branch out a litttle from the game and try something new.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:38 PM
8

They tried to design vagina shaped missiles but they just turned out to be exploding wind socks.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:06 AM
3

Wanna cracker?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 12:01 AM
3

What are you asking?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:58 PM
1

That is part of the point. You meet people out there doing the same stuff that interests you.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:17 PM
1

If it ever came to that I think the number of "disappeared" exs would go up. I don't think that will happen though.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:25 PM
3

North West liberals are more like Canadians. The North east liberal ladies have the same socialist ideas but mix them with a taste for Prada.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 08:11 PM
3

Your liberals in Colorado may as well be Tea Part Patriots by the standards of places like NY and Cali. Come visit The North East portion of this great nation and find even a hand full of women not like the ones depicted in this article. Honestly after 20 years of dating up here I'm hard pressed believing there are any.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:48 PM
2

It can be common in more misandric schools. The concept that "Boys can hold it while girls can't" is pretty wide spread. In a sense it can be true biologically. However, it is due to boys being taught to ignore discomfort far more than biology. Also when a boy/man holds his bladder for extended times it damages the prostate and can eventually lead to prostate swelling and incontinance. So in reality it is possibly even more important for boys not to hold it. There were boys in my school who also…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:30 PM
7

I believe I saw in some videos that men used to be held financially and physically responsible for the actions of their spouses and children in the past. It was mentioned to explain why men were the head of household and had to "control" their familly. Since if their wife stole something the husband would serve time for not controlling her. Seems we are bringing that back? Only this time without men having the freedom to use force to keep the familly in line. More fodder for the grass eaters.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:13 PM
1

It may be true. I can't say for sure. Being there after the fact and not in the heat of the moment it is hard to assess the emotional drive of the victim. If I were to assign general terms to describe the prevailing emotions I have seen in suicidal cases they would be; Male - Defeated, and Femal - Forgotten. It ties in with gender norms. Men are expected to acheive, when they are at their lowest they express thoughts of never amounting to anything, hopeless loss of self worth, and the idea that …
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:04 PM
1

I have heard that one as well. The thing about psychology, especially the psychology of suicide, is that everyone is different in subtle ways. I do not perscribe to any theories that state "men are more likely to -Rage/ women are more likely to - sad" Even if the numbers bear out to be true, pigeon-holing people makes helping them much harder.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:46 PM
13

I worked in a psych center. Taking 20 Tylenol is considered a suicide attempt. Most attempted suicides I dealt with in females were mild - mid-grade overdose of medication ranging from aspirin to sleeping meds. Not to say some of them were not intent on dying, nor to say that any of them did not deserve or require help. In the men I saw both failed and successful attempts. Methods ranged from self inflicted gun shot to jumping off a bridge or even drinking a gallon of bleach. Men do seem to util…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:13 AM
4

I apologize to you then. I figured a number more than double full time working hours would be a give-away.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:50 AM
1

To discover yourself and enjoy life. It can be a dull and tedious world at times. Experiences make you a better person. You can never know what things make you happy if all you do is look at what makes you upset.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:48 AM
2

Yea it was hyperbole. The intent is just to show that different people do different things to enjoy free time.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:00 AM
4

It's actually a bad trend as well. Focus on those skills is prevalent in the west. Meanwhile we are being out-competed by many Asian companies full of all but mute workers. We focus our time in the board room "tossing the ball" and "getting outside the box" while they sit in their offices and "Think". Both styles have their merit. We however focus too much on the former. Some of the greatest minds in history couldn't be aersed to give more than a "good day" to others. It wasn't a popularity cont…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:39 PM
7

That sort of "biased shit" runs academia. When/if I have a son I will save every dime I have to send him to an all boys academy. If any such establishment still exists.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:03 PM
1

I was being a bit over dramatic. 87 seems close when I observe my neice wearing her I-phone ear-ring though.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:01 PM
7

True. However it does benefit them in the modern work environment given that a large portion of the jobs of today center around communication and other general BSery.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:00 PM
34

For many, this is a very important one. You see the women as victim status often hampers mens issues being evaluated. If there was more of a message that women have some perks as well, perhapse society would feel that they can spare some time for the guys.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:50 PM
5

18 Young men are nearly twice as likely to live with their parents as young women the same age are. Perhapse because the young women are in dorm rooms paid for by either parents or grants and scholarships?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:28 PM
11

The average American boy spends 1/2 hour talking on the phone with friends, the average American girl spends 87 hours a week talking on the phone with friends. Just because young men choose to waste time in a different maner than girls does not make it a terrible thing. Granted when I was young me and my pals screwed around outside for 4+ hours a day insted of playing video games. But in the end we were still just screwing around.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:25 PM
11

In a way I suppose I always have been one. One could say it may have been the older girl who molested me as a child. Some may point to my mother abandoning me and my siblings for weeks at a time whenever she and my father had an argument. Maybe it was the beatings I took from female teachers in my parochial school. The first I began to show it was in grade school, where I would leave class to use the restroom if I needed to. The rules were that girls could do this, boys had to hold it untill lun…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:31 PM
3

I can say anecdotally that I know of a few dozen P-passes given out to friends of mine on DWI charges. On woman I know actually got pulled over twice (and let go twice) on the same ride home. She was hammered that night and was even sluring her speach on the phone with me.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:55 PM
11

I agree with the guarding and maintaining of the essential freedoms won by early feminists. Ensuring that women maintain the right to vote, rights to govern their own reproduction, and rights to equal opportunity (note I said opportunity not outcome) in both education and careers. But then, in the vocal modern feminist movement i see little of that. What I see are pushes for equal outcome, Castigation of men, and an elevated privalege status for women due solely to their genetic makeup. I know s…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 07:09 PM
2

Would you say that the last quote you added here demostrably shows that women are just as capable of sexual violence as men? I'm just asking. I personally feel that attention to ALL prison rape regardles of gender is needed. This is a situation that needs to be remedied for the good of all.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:47 PM
1

Women and children do not need to suffer because men have been given the same right to opt out of parenthood as women. Any suffering done would be the result of the womans choice not the mans. She could choose to opt out as well saving herself and the potential child any suffering. Women should not be reluctant to come forward about an assault even if there were some punishment for lieing. Only those caught in a blatant lie would be punished. So unless someone is abused and jokes with friends ab…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 12:50 AM
2

ohh I think that many of the active MRAs are aware of it. We just shouldn't feel afraid to state it openly.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 06:17 AM
0

That will be their rhetoric yes. But none of it is true. Except the resources bit.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:52 AM
27

Feminism is as much a job for these types of feminist as Catholicism is for the pope and priests, Islam is for the Imam, and Judaism is to the Rabi. Feminism holds sway in many of the humanities and as such holds a tight lock on social work type jobs. The staffing of women's shelters, anti- sexual harassment compliance advisers, Womens studies professors as well as professorships in other branches, Politicians, advocacy groups, womens charities staff and administration. Etc etc. They have turned…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:26 AM
66

We are seeing a lot more of this type of argument lately. The whole MR is bull because you don't need them since Feminism does all of that for you already. To me it is a really blatant example of market protection. It sounds like "you don't want to buy pepsi because coke is already cola" "p.s. pepsi rapes your mothers". These people are not fighting for equality. They are fighting to preserve the only career they could get with their crap womyns studies degree.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:13 PM
18

Only if the blowhole is penetrated. If the dolphins want to go around jamming their blowholes onto any apendage they see fit thats just not as bad. Besides. you like it anyway.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:06 PM
-7

Bored.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:56 PM
0

Not true. Ever seen the movie "Monster"? It tells the story of Eileen Wornos (sp) who was a prostitute in Florida who killed numerous men. The media and the movie spun it as her response to being abused by men. Serial killing hooker? Nah!! Victim of society who broke down.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:03 PM
1

JTO stood and spoke coherently and rationally to a hand full of white knights with box cutters. If someone jumps you defend, barring that no violence what so ever.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:37 PM
0

They will listen because they will see that mens rights do not equal womens suffering. That men having access to their children does not harm the well being of women. That med getting help when abused does no harm to women. That men not dieing of suicide, war, and workplace injury does not hurt women. They will listen because they will see that the only people who insist that those things will hurt women are feminists who show that they have no qualms with hurting men and women alike.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:36 PM
5

Feminism is not all women, nor is it all men. They are a vocal subculture who have held the ear of law for too long. They have done harm but not irreparable harm. If the MRA shows their egalitarian motives and demonstrates a better way, people will listen and they will be swayed.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:59 AM
1

Not talking self defense here. Talking about the outbursts of threatened violence. Take the video from the Warren Farrel talk. A few people commented they would have punched or otherwise harmed that protester. I'll allow that she was infuriating and foul, but the way the man in the footage conducted himself did more for the image and message of the MRA than anyone striking her could have.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:56 AM
2

I agree to an extent. However Tyler was a means to an end. Just as the MRA should be and as Feminism should have been. Once that explosion achieves the goal the balance is reached and that counter measure is no longer needed. Allowing it to continue on it will likely do harm.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:27 AM
1

I see it like this. In the time of the Raj in India, the british authority referred to the Indian people as savages. By showing the world they were indeed not savage they made their voice heard. We should do the same as we are burdened by a similar stigma.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:02 PM
5

This is great. lets all show our support in any way we can to this group. Here is their home page Link I will be writing them a letter of thanks in their contact us box and possibly sending a small donation as well.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:59 PM
2

True. I see this post as shooting down the flag if you will. We may have a long way to go to take the hill, but the symbolism of taking out such a prominent representation of what we oppose is significant in and of itself.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:52 PM
11

Agreed. Violence is one of the negative defining characteristics of the male stereotype uppon which feminism justifies its assault on men. By removing violence or the threat of violence we remove one of the tools in the kit that maintains the current status.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:50 PM
4

I don't feel he left that out. He just wasn't talking about it. He was focused solely on the "Man Up" trend. I think it is good to deconstruct these things to focus on one issue at a time rather than try to call attention to the whole problem all at once.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:42 PM
1

Exactly. But when Jack overcomes his sense of disposability he no longer needs Tyler and casts him out. Tyler is the reactionary force needed to ballance the societal pressures.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:20 PM
1

I think that the rant/quote where he said "A generation of men raised by women. I’m wondering if another woman is the answer we really need." was telling. But that was Tyler speaking not Ed Nortons character, so it is considdered to be the hard push. What I mean is that the main Character of no name struggled with his feminized life as well as his required conformity to societal gender roles of men. He lashed back with Tyler. An over the top force to equal the force placed against him. Only in t…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:18 PM
2

Sarcasm?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 04:37 PM
29

This was a great read. Loved what he said to the last letter. I was not surprised to see some of the comments trying to agree with the OP and slowly turning their words toward telling him to MAN UP. Do people actually believe that saying "I agree with you OP. We need to realize that all people are held to societal roles. Gender rolls hurt all of us. Gender rolls created by the Patriachy. That effect you less than any other identifiable group. So MAN UP." is going to work. Ohh you think you are s…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:23 PM
12

I am not going to argue with you, nor will I demonize your opinion here. I will say that the flaw I see is in your perception though. You are over reacting. You have a reason to. You are fearful and uncertain. Why? Have you been assaulted by a man who cat called you to whom you didn't respond. Or has media and Feminist propaganda that all men are ravenous raping animals ingrained into you a misplaced and irrational fear? My advice to you is to get some self defense classes, Go out into the world…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:51 AM
0

This is where I am glad that OWS coined the whole 1% thing. You are talking about less than 1% of the people there. Because people like Gates and others did work and create to earn it. There is surprisingly few people that fit that standard of non earners you speak of. Besides that they do not steal the money. They inherit it or earn it. If you feel they are making too much I agree. But remember we as the consumers agree to pay their prices thus enabling them.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:41 AM
3

Well the trouble with it really is that it overlooks individuality. Some people just plain suck at some tasks. I am no great wizard with math. That means that I should not be a structural engeneer just because I want to be one. Feminism incorporates that falacy to no end with "fair hiring practice" Listen if you can actually do this job better you can have it. You don't get just for wanting. Socialism tried this in the soviet union with the forced colectivization of the farm industry. They refus…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:38 PM
3

Because it the minds of feminism MRAs have to be the bible thumping hard right patriachs of their imagination. The characters from "Mad Men" drinking wisky and smoking cigars in plush dens contemplating their dominance. We as a gender have to embody the very image of selfish power.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:58 PM
4

Earning. FTFY True Marxist socialism is a fine Idea. He envisioned a hard working society who took joy in that labor. The reality is that there are far too many who see socialism as their ticket to undeserved wealth. Socialism is an ideal founded uppon the cooperation of honest people sharing their production for the benefit of all. When in practice it is a class of lazy or unskilled people being toted on the shoulders of others. Most (not all) but most of the American supporters of socialism I …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:10 PM
1

ahh. 18. Focus on you man. Find yourself. Use the little extra cash you can hold onto by not courting relationships to live a bit. Take a trip somewhere you will always remember. Do some cool shit. See concerts etc. Free and 18 is a good thing man. Work hard and make yourself the sole beneficiary.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:16 AM
2

Ha. Nah. Things crop up out of nowhere. And actually an Asian woman over 40 may not be too bad a deal.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:06 AM
2

May be regional. Ir just the age group. I know how that is. Think on relocating if you like to drift a bit. If you are rooted find something you are interested in that you don't currently do. Will put you in touch with a new crowd and possibly find some one.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:19 AM
1

I will have to look for that. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:38 PM
1

Try to reel in if ya can. And good luck in the finding a lady endeavor.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:37 PM
1

I can observe light in a room when the lamp is on. There could also be light in the room at day time with the light off. However, If I turn on the lamp and I observe light there is a good chance that at the least a fair amount of the light in the room is coming from the lamp daytime or not.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:56 PM
1

At 18 that is probably just fine. Just try to avoid the death grip and don't dive too deeply down the porn rabbit hole.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 06:53 PM
1

You brought it up. Exactly. Why? I was not discussing anything except the one topic. You brought in all this other stuff and all that did was obfuscate the discussion at hand. The post I was commenting on was about what I was talking about. Not all of what you drug in. You deliberately or through ignorance tried to derail the discussion. These men specifically said that they had X happen to them and to the last one demonstrated behavior pattern A. This is called observational analysis and it is …
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:36 AM
2

That is a problem too. If it became common that men were flat out saying "hey ladies you just don't do it for me" "You are just too loose and I need something tighter and with maybe some 6 speed vibration and spinning action" Do you think that would be taken well? The vagina is like any part of the body. The more you stress it the more insensitive it becomes. That is natural. Same for penises. Sex help specialists tell men that masturbation is fine in small doses but not all the time and avoid t…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:26 AM
4

Women have always been the primary victims of suicide. They loose their husbands, their fathers, and their sons to suicide. They have to face the world alone in the absence of these men. Often the people in the suicide support groups are women who have lost male family. Really guys if we are going to be selfish pricks and blow our brains out amidst the very depths of depression we can at least accept that the poor ladies will now have to go it alone. /S/ if needed.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:47 AM
2

she did serve some time but you are right that was a travesty. They were both very sick people.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:36 AM
3

The Vatican still holds the ancient system of sanctuary. If someone turns to the "house of god" they will not turn them over to authorities for punishment.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:14 AM
11

I'm going to have to disagree with much of what you said here. That's jumping to conclusions. There exist examples of people who haven't had girlfriends or sexual partners until late 20s who did not have early sexual experiences. If that can happen on its own, it happening with people with early experiences can simply be a coincidence. Again: people can have this attitude without having been molested. People can have a bad self image without having early sexual experiences. Causality is often me…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:05 AM
16

Society is freely talking about how porn addiction and masturbation is killing female sexual satisfaction. We have not started discussing the possibility that 12 inch vibrating oscillating clit tickling 10 speed toys may be screwing up sex for men. I think both points are valid and likely true.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:09 AM
20

I get the whole he said he liked it thing. But I look deeper. His use of the words "made me" in regards to the touching. Then the follow up that OP didn't have any sexual interaction again for over 10 years. In fact every person who chimed in with similar stories said the same. "yea I was 9 and she was 16 and we had sex...I didn't have a girl friend until I was 25". That is what any first year psychologist would recognize as repression. They were not confident in pursuing normal healthy sexual d…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:57 AM
1

1. No I feel men are discriminated against differently than women. It just happens that many ways in which we are, women benefit. 2. I feel on a whole that the goal of women's rights have been met. And that the legal establishment is there to weed out any left over bigotry. Discrimination may be faced on individual basis however systemic anti female bigotry? I don't see it. The war was won it's just picking off the stragglers. 3. Race is a different issue and racism varies greatly by region. 4. …
/r/MensRights08/12/12 02:36 AM
27

Good for them. Those may not have been white knights though. May have just been dudes currently dating an "artsy" chick and went to the show with her.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:36 PM
45

Yes. They will. They will apologise for having been so insensitive. They did invade a female safe space you know.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:44 PM
1

Good analogy, perhaps some coffe could fix that tiredness. I was just curious. Sometime people just need/want something lighthearted to lift them up. I watch old episodes of the muppet show. If MLP makes you smile and somehow puts you in a better mood which then makes you pleasant to be around I'm all for it.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:35 PM
2

I wouldn't criticize for something like that. I do see a lot of it around the net though so I can understand your defensiveness. Can I ask you though, Why? Ny neice plays MLP videos all the time, and all I know is that after a 8 hour car ride I wanted to go to a petting zoo with a bucket of pink paint and a shotgun. Maybe I'm missing something, but hey we are all different. Kinda cool you like it though. Will make you possible "best dad ever!" material if you should have a kid someday.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:32 PM
2

The term primary indicates first or majority in some cases. Since everything she lists as effects suffered by women as result of war is resultant of their husband, son, brother, etc being killed first, primary is misleading. The primary target in any war is enemy combattants, most likely men. Women and the issues they face resultant of war falls under the term collateral damage.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:15 PM
1

The fact that we are all trained to be mothers from infancy on means that we are all trained to devote our lives to men, whether they are our sons or not; that we are all trained to force other women to exemplify the lack of qualities which characterizes the cultural construct of femininity. -Andrea Dworkin Acompanied by Andrea Dworkin and Janice Raymond, have concluded that not only will women be further marginalized and oppressed by this eventuality, but they will become obsolete. Is it societ…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:29 PM
1

FEMINISM IS THE ULTIMATE EXAMPLE OF THE BUCKET OF CRABS METAPHOR! Feminisn is not about equality for these types. Feminism is the projection of insecure people, with no faith in their own ability to make something of themselves, dragging down the competition. It is the very essense of "If I can't have it neither can you!" These are the grown up version of the kid who kicks down sand castles at the beach. They are so pathetic. You may not criticize and reduce a woman to her base physical characte…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:25 PM
1

You are correct in your reference to the more common type of rape. But you yourself stated the reason I did not include that in my prior statement. "The most prevalent form of rape is not stranger rape by a serial rapist with some external tool, but rather acquaintance rape that often is a result of miscommunication and grey areas of consent." It is my opinion that people involved in this type of crime should be labled differently. They are not "Rapists" in the same sense as someone who persues …
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:11 PM
1

The overwhelming majority of tests now employed DNA technology. Altogether there were 354,011 cases of paternity testing, amounting to 0.125 per cent of the US population. Results were provided for 353,387 cases, of which 99,174 — or 28 per cent — were exclusions.30 That is, 28 per cent of putative fathers were found not to be the biological father. Taken from the results of this study. American Association of Blood Banks, ‘Annual Report Summary for Testing in 2003’, www.aabb. org/Aboutthe AABB/…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:09 PM
1

I'm lazy right now. google it yourself. I have seen the number set between 1/10 and 1/15 most frequently. The number of actual tested is 1/3 but given the fact that few are tested without obvious cause for concern that will be elevated. If I feel like getting you a source later I will.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:23 PM
1

They don't even need to do a cheek swab. That test method is used to be minimally invasive. But it is not needed when one can take a portion of a blood sample taken for other testing for the purpose of the genetic test. They are going to take blood regardless may as well send a few drops to the dna lab.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:56 PM
1

Trouble with that argument is that while 1/10 children are result of paternity fraud 1/10 men is not a rapist. With numbers such as 1/10 there is valid reason for doubt.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:53 PM
3

How can you say "men are strong" without implying women are weak? How can you say "men are logical" without implying that women are less logical? That is absolutely incorrect. One can define something without use of a comparative. "The earth is large" is a statement of fact not contingent upon ants being small. Unless a statement of characteristics is made with accompaniment of comparison there is no implied comparison. You, just as many others, insert the comparative. This is resultant of the t…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:49 PM
1

Many people debate this topic from time to time. The fact is that rape is not often about sex at all. Rape is more typically about dominance over another person and a desire to humiliate and control them. There have been many convicted serial rapists and serial sexual murderers who were incapable of getting an erection. They typically utilize an instrument to sexually assault their victim. They gain no personal sexual stimulus through their actions. This also applies to woman on woman rape. Usin…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:22 PM
2

Relavant
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:43 PM
0

She actually says "Why would you pay money to see a rape apologist if you weren't fuckin one. You fucking scum!" By transposing weren't and fucking to the order she has, it has...a different implication. Maybe a projection slip from a girl who has only had boy/girlfriends attend her poetry readings because they felt they owed it to the supplier of their nookie. Just a guess.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 03:22 PM
9

Most of them are. The pig nose one is obvious. Also the girl in the red hat at about 3.36. She tries to say something she thinks will get her approval from the herd and when she doesn't she just kinda tapers off and looks awkward. If you watch this vid looking for that "desperate for attention and immature" behavior you will see it almost wall to wall. Like the sudden take up of chanting fuck W. F. All of the giggles and glances toward friends. These people are pathetic attention seekers.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:32 AM
1

Ping pong is not a sport in the same sense. Any physically demanding sport causes injury. I work in the medical field and have seen more injuries from Basketball, baseball, tennis, and hocky players than football. All sports do damage to the body. Ask a marathon runner about their knees.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:13 PM
4

This may be a long reply. And when I speak of these thinks I write very stream of conciousness so bear with me and feel free to request clarification. First, your mental state in regards to what has happened. You seem to be holding a hightened sense of personal shame and guilt as a result of this. Most likely this is due to your own past experiences. It is not addressed nearly enough in councelling of victims, nor is it addressed well in many cases, that the victim may hold themselves to a more …
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:53 PM
4

That guy held his cool so well. I would have had to respond in some way. Perhapse just to say "I don't think Mr. Farrell is a rape apologist.' Regardless of that I assure you miss I am not fucking any rape apologists to my knowledge" That one girl was quite prominant throughout the footage. I think she may need a therapist.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:16 PM
3

I'm sorry that happened to your friend. I hope she is well, and is making good recovery. The schools are not just covering the student athlete, they are covering themselves. Schools are corporation first educators second. A rape conviction or police on campus investigating smears their name and costs them enrollment and money. They deliberately obfuscate local police in all matters not just rapes.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:57 AM
5

Because Feminism is a derivative of socialism/Marxism. And in socialism it is not about jobs being done by the most qualified, it is about everyone getting a crack at the prize. Just look into Russian history behind the iron curtain. All they did was take positions from the skilled to distribute "Fairly" and they starved as a result. Feminism embraces the most flawed ideals of a tried and failed ideology and co opts it into their form of "equality" Edit: I knew the down votes would be coming. I …
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:51 AM
1

I won't jump on the big Pharma wagon. But you are right on many points. I think a lot of it is cultural. Women appear to be more attuned to and victim of media images. House wives think they should be socialites and their ordinary life makes them depressed. Business women bought the You Can Do It All gag and now they are in a high stress world they can't stand and need anti anxiety meds. I would say societal expectations have a great effect on psychiatric medicine. Women (victims of the insane a…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 03:44 AM
10

A dog will protect it's master. The master of a dog is the person who feeds and nurtures it. Human instinct is not far different. From birth the human child lookes uppon the mother as it's source of food and comfort. There is an inate desire to protect ones provider from harm, as trauma to the provider translates to trauma to the self by proxy. If mom gets hurt I starve. It is instinctive attatchment.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:05 PM
2

I would like to tell these folks that Being feminist and condemning the war of 1812 is counter productive. Here is why. When the Brittish colonial Canadian forces burned the White House they created a legend. That legend, Dolly Madison. Who saved the famous portrait on Washington from the fire and helped to design and decorate the new White house. She is considdered to be the first "First Lady" in American history. And she owes much of her fame to the War of 1812 and her conduct durring that con…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 05:53 PM
2

Doch seems to have decided to drop the "femen" but keep the isms. The woman in the video kept saying Capitalism is the problem etc. She is obviously a very pro socialist marxist supporter. Denying that only confirms that the denier agrees with the sentiment.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 04:23 PM
6

When one group is more susceptible to the idea that life issues can be solved by the aplication of a pill, you will see that group use more pills. Also you will see them throw more pills at the child who they perceive as more problematic. Thus we have boys overperscribed ADHD meds by moms and teachers who just can't handle the energy of, nor understand the mentality of boys. And grown women who try to medicate frustration and sadness.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:06 PM
4

Well, you see, the opressed have a right to complain and get upset. When the opressed spout hate it is justifiable because opressors are deserving of hatred. When the opressed behave badly it is an act of throwing off the shackles of opression. No one would scorn an assault victim for raging at their attacker in the court room. Now the privaledged. Well, lets just say that when the privaledged so much as critique anyone except themselves they are a hate group. If the privaledged complain it is a…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 05:30 PM
2

Like 70% of ladies drinks are free to them in those places no matter what night it is. Because they guys are buying the drinks. I know people who own and work in bars. They make more money on ladies night because of bigger crowds and the guys buy the ladies drinks more than the ladies go to the bar for free ones.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:48 PM
3

Actually this won't happen. Because when government can no longer afford to provide for women's "liberation" they will use the court system to financially enslave men to do it....Ohh that's already a thing.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 07:05 PM
2

No because a straight man raping a straight man is impossible. a straight man would never rape a straight man The implication of course being that if a man rapes another man that makes him gay. Thank god the feminists are helping out the LGBT community with all of their understanding and empathy.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:50 PM
1

Easy. Psych-hospital. She gave herself a time out in a psych wing because her victim mentality and constant paranoia got out of hand.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:47 PM
1

Not related to the discourse of the thread; But the fact that in your world environments must be "Artificially free of broken glass" is sad to me. You need to get away from populated places for a few. Take a walk somewhere that random trash is the rarity not the norm.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:04 PM
1

I'm only going to respond to that last bit about education reform. It may be true that feminists spear-headed a look into the methods of teaching and how they fail. However, they did so in a stilted way that has since been debunked and outdated due to its biases. The general problem you mentioned in education is being addressed more validly by many reformers. The consensus is that the old system was designed to create a strong work force in an industry based society. Not that it was designed onl…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 08:12 AM
6

Because only republicans are programmable automatons that ape whatever they are told.....Unlike a liberal who blindly takes a false sense of moral superiority over a huge subset of people because John Stewart is funny. F'ing teabaggers
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:07 AM
2

I can't take this seriously. It just sounds like a child throwing a fit. "Timmy has a toy truck! So does Suzy! But I don't so their trucks should be smashed!" It's simple. Play with one of the myriad toys you have, and if having a truck is that important to you, there are ways of acquiring one.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:00 AM
0

This may well be true. But I have my doubts. If this were the tomb of the unnamed victim of breast cancer I think she would probably be choking back tears. Death in combat has been a solely male thing over the years and she is so far removed from that risk she lacks empathy.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 03:42 PM
2

Yea they gave her the option to resign or be fire, along with the person who took the picture. Usually I would condemn firing for social behavior. However, this happened on the clock on a company trip to DC.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 03:32 AM
6

That is true. I'm not saying she can't do it. Just that it is very distasteful, and a sign that she places the value of her opinions above the value of those mens lives. Just as she is free to do that others are free to call her an ass for it.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 02:33 AM
1

Didn't know that existed.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:55 AM
3

You may feel that way. To me it seems like a symptom of male disposability in society. The disrespect of men who died in war is a dehumanization.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:54 AM
4

Screaming profanity and flipping off the tomb of the unnamed soldiers.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:53 AM
3

I have been to Arlington many times. The faces of those who visit there are always solemn and respectful. Especially the men. Perhaps because men in general have a deeper sense of the sacrifices made. I cannot imaging what level of selfishness and dissociation it takes to do what this woman seems to think is funny. It's just sad.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 01:11 AM
1

Yes but the only way for a kid to look barely like the parents is if one is not the parent. People know what I meant by it.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 01:01 AM
3

I don't disagree that it is unhealthy. I'm just sticking to one topic though. What you say is true. And further, we do not know this woman or her thoughts. She may even be involved in an affair and if OP gets a vasectomy she can't pull the oops "I don't know why the baby doesn't look like either of us".
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:22 PM
1

Don't sweat it. I think half the christians in the world have the same misconception. It's never made quite clear. The idea is that Mary was a "pure vessel" inwhich Christ would be carried.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:19 PM
7

If a woman wants an abortion and she speaks to her SO and he says no, should she get the abortion? This guy has talked to his wife about this. He did the right thing by consulting. She said no. So what ever your answer to the above question is, should be applied to what he does now.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:37 PM
5

That is a misconception. Mary herself was conceived without origional sin according to the bible. She then had Jesus through virgin birth. Two separate events.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:45 PM
1

Not sure but she sounds like Georgia or Bama.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 02:38 PM
1

Men don't give a shit about their kids........ I did not say that at all. Men losing custody battles statistically didn't give two shits about parenting before the divorce and suddenly want custody. Hmmm. Yea I must have misread something. A kid needs (positive) attention more than it needs material things. True. Maybe if mom didn't automatically get the defalt position of working part time, placing financial obligations onto dad, they would have time for more of that. I don't call those guys me…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:36 PM
1

Where do you live?! Behind their cooking pots? You have to be trolling. I would be shocked if one out of one hundred women I know can manage not to ruin ramen noodles. This is not 1950 stop pretending you are fighting the battle your grandma won for you before you ever existed. You think that it is treating women as inferior that they get, on average 40% reduction in sentancing? Well then since you fight against that treatment I will expect to see you and your fellows protesting the unfairly low…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 03:26 PM
3

Yea that sounds about right. Don't bother looking at the statistics out there. Don't look at the current divorce rate, the percentage of those divorces initiated by women, the percentage of those divorces that result in the sole custody of the children going to the woman. Don't look at the current child support system and how destructive it is for men. Don't look at comparissons between men and womens sentancing in the criminal justice system. Don't look at the suicide rates. Don't step out of y…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:15 PM
6

Next Halloween I'm dressing up as Stalin Ken and heading to Georgia for some make up sex.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:28 AM
4

True.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:59 PM
13

Some day Hitler Barbie you shall be my lady. I will treat you like the delicate flower you are.....sigh.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:37 PM
8

I'm glad you said this. I remember when I was young, the first exposure I had to the gay rights movement was when a protest group went into St Patricks cathedral in NYC on St. Pats day and spat the sacrament onto the floor and at the people. That act cost the rights movement quite a bit in my young eyes. It is hard to be convinced to respect people who are acting so disrespectfully.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:27 PM
2

You seem to have gotten your list of issues that men face either from a dream of from efeminate gay men. (read not all gay men just the ones who trend toward being feminine). Mens issues are not ,cant wear pink, can't do ballet, cant be a hair dresser. Mens issues are can't get custody of their kids, get harsher sentences from law, are vilified by misandric feminist dogma such as all men are rapists, and many others. I hope that your list was due to being misinformed and not just outright belitt…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:17 PM
3

I think "women tend to be the ones who focus on 'fixing' the marriage" is a bit of a generality don't you? Given that 75+% of divorce is initiated by wives? I think women tend to be the ones who focus on 'Fixing Their Husband' is more to the point. While men tend to be more content with the wife they have. I don't fully disagree with you. I just think that the numbers don't support your acertion.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:26 PM
30

I reserve judgement until my stock in childrens leg braces pays off from the resurgence of polio. God I hate that lady.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:20 PM
8

When Kate seemed too drunk to leave with Chris, I checked in on her. And when I walked in on her riding Chris she laughed at me and said I was a creep and a stalker. (portrait of when white knighting goes wrong)
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:46 PM
1

I know. Contrast that to the comments of the girls in that OPs thread. They are so comfortable with their desires that they feel free to list them as "Rights". Where as a man with the same desires conscripts them to sources of personal shame. This is what feminism and "rape culture" have created.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:10 PM
2

Every male between the ages of 12-18 can tell you of a place where the presence of women makes them less than comfortable. Every time that they have to strategically carry their books, each time they have to remain seated after the bell and think of last nights ball game. Females should be banned from schools!! Because the time has come for young men to be free of spontaneous boner shame, and the prying eyes of gigling females.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:08 PM
5

What it means is, that the women rightly perceive all men as potential abusers and therefore the presence of any man construes a threat to them. When a woman is abused she is in the right to be afraid of all men, not just the man who abused her. On the flip side, men are quite aware that the woman who abused them is just some sort of unnatural aberation. A one in a billion chance. He has no reason to fear other women, as he can be sure than no woman other than his abuser has ever hurt a man ever…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:51 PM
1

Even then. I was acting out a behavior I was experiencing from my abuser. It may well have been her discomfort and refusal that helped me to realize something wrong was happening. I know kids are supposed to be curious and experiment a bit.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 03:38 PM
4

Here is an article of the reversal. Note the differences.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:24 PM
12

Why have we as a society created this? This mentality of entitlement. It is a poison in our youth, especially among women. "I am entitled to drunk sex when I want it!" This sounds exacly like a quote taken from some stereotypical frat boy date rapist on an after-school special or rape prevention meeting. "I am entitled to file a rape charge if I was drunk and I wasn't happy about it the next day!" The snare is set, the demand made. Men of the world, it is now officially your obligation to cater …
/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:47 PM
6

A good way to get into the meat of the MRM is to watch GirlWritesWhat on you tube. She is real good at laying it all out there.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:51 AM
2

I avoid that place at all costs. I'm a relatively right leaning guy who has great friends who are pretty far left, pretty far right, devout libertarians, and a couple who could care less as long as they get to smoke pot. The only political ideologies I can't abide are those in the people who can't admit their shit can stink too.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:30 AM
2

I figured you would. Most rational people can admit the connection. Hell me being more on the conservative side I have to admit that those nut bag West burro Baptists are likely registered the same. Just because they happen to be in the same camp does not make you bunk mates.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:19 AM
0

Both parties do that. Repubs say no abortion and no gay marriage libs say no smokes and no fatty foods. It's all the same. That's why i'm a conservative leaning libertarian. I lean conservative because the economy is the number one concern right now. Anyway I think the reason people say feminism is liberalism is because they are. They are dancing in the streets with Obamas reelection how can anyone assume they are not liberal? Best way to say it is Feminism is liberalism but liberalism is not fe…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:12 AM
1

World Star got more hits over the upper-cut bus driver than they ever dreamed possible. Suddenly we get more videos from them following the same exact model. I'm calling BS. I think the whole thing looks set up, the girl keeps looking at the camera for cues. This is just a dregs web site looking to continue the cash in. Ignore it.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:03 AM
1

Wow. You are a messed up dude. I feel sorry for you. I never thought I would do this but I have reported your comment. I hate censorship, and my skin is thick. But comments like this, if read by someone more vulnerable, could be really harmfull to them. As such I felt the need to respond. Any man or woman reading this needs to ignore this persons obvious sick opinion. Your life is valuable and your pain is lamentable. Do not let people like this convince you otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 06:44 PM
8

I hope that guy follows the advice. He is in a very dangerous position there and he could loose his daughter. If the birth mom is not in the picture it is possible this girlfriend could get the custody depending on how long they have lived together. He needs to be worried about his daughter and himself.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:31 PM
9

I'd rather not. But perhaps you would not mind spending a night watching over someone who has attempted suicide. Try to learn some empathy. Being a sociopath may seem easy, as it makes you feel untouchable. However, one day you may find that, being so, no one cares to touch you any way. I hope that suicide never touches you or anyone you know, not even for the benefit of making you human.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 11:01 PM
2

Thanks. Yes I am in a much better place. The reason I reacted as I did to my friends sisters confession to me was that I had not, at that time, dealt with any of what had happened. My abuser was 16, therefore it was not a case of experimentation. Thank you for the best wishes.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:58 PM
4

I am glad to see this being read by many people. I ask that those who do read my post look at the entire thread where it was posted. Other men have talked about their experiences as well and they deserve to be heard equally. I also ask that you question why these stories seem so alien. Many men suffer such things in silence and the biggest shame is that the structures in place to help with such things treat male victims like liars or weak. Please if you are part of or in school for a position in…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:51 PM
5

Surprisingly it gets easier each time. And I make being open and honest a priority in my life. Being able to tell it takes away the power it has to create that shame and guilt. Thank you.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 08:02 PM
1

Glad to hear that. When faced with adversity one must choose to either be dominated by it or to become stronger as a result.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:05 PM
5

First, I am sorry your life has been so difficult, I hope you are coping well and that you are compensated with a good life now. I agree with you both in that some are not ready to confront their issues. I do respect that. But victim mentality can't be allowed to take hold. To me there is a difference between being a victim and being a person who has been victimized. It is important to air the wound so that it may heal well and not fester. Thanks for your input. It is also important to me to rem…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 12:39 AM
14

I neglected to answer one of your main questions, I apologise. In terms of how it all has effected my perception and relations to women; I don't distrust them in that the implication of that is that I doubt trust worthy individuals. I judge them. I look quite deeply at the character of any woman I have interaction with especially if there is potential romantic involvement. I see through the veil of popular portrayal of women being sweet and virtuous as a whole. Some are and I love that. But most…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:25 PM
46

The state of denyal in the psychiatric and crisis community should be a top priority for MRM. What you dealt with in your attempt to seek help is inexcusable.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:13 PM
7

I hated that. I'm with someone now, but when I was single and dating I got the "whats wrong with you?" "Why don't you want me?" and my favorite "you are not a man!" often. I'm sorry your getting that and it is not about you it is about their entitlement and insecurity. As to the enjoyment of sex. All I can say is it gets better with time. Stay strong, and get help when and if you feel the need to.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:04 PM
16

Perhapse, But I would not say definately. If those guys in your life act that way it could just as easilly be fear of the repercussions of the "rape culture" mentality. Many decent men are petrified of sexual activity with someone who can have them jailed afterward on a whim. I am not trivializing actual rapes and assaults, However, the bar is set pretty low for women to accuse these days. And many guys are scared and timid as a result. If those guys are like that due to circumstances such as mi…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:10 PM
10

I understand that and sympathise. However, confronting those emotional responses is one of the most important aspects of the healing process. Like with alcoholics and the 12 steps. One step is to confront and apologise to those htey had harmed with their illness. Part of that is allowing those effected to resond as they please and to accept the guilt, shame, rage, sadness, and all the other bad feelings that come with the process. It is a very hard step in healing but a deeply necessary one.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:59 PM
111

I will answer the second question first. I felt everything. That situation became a big cluster F that took me down some dark twists. To elaborate on that event; I was at a party and the woman/girl/ perp was hounding me. I made it clear to her and her friends that I was in no way interested in her. I became very drunk and left the party to stumble off into a park near by. I was pretty much black out stage by then but I found a nice secluded patch of grass to lay down in to sleep off the booze. T…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:54 PM
21

I don't find it offensive. I just honestly feel that it is an attempt to validate people being reactionary and overly sensitive. If someone asking a simple question "triggers" you. I think you need to get back to councelling.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:59 PM
57

First let me clear something. I am of the opinion that anyone who has worked through the psychological issues resultant from a traumatic expirience should no longer be subject to "Triggers". That is a phrase popularized by people who I feel embrace their victim status and wallow in it instead of truely working out the phsych issues. That being said, don't hold back for fear of damaging my sensibilities. If I understand your question correctly you want to know if the person uppon whome the act wa…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:57 PM
27

I would be willing to answer some questions for you. What would you like to know?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:31 PM
1

I believe it was one of stardusks blogs. Can't find the exact one at the moment. I will look later for a link. Link It is a long one. Start around 4:30.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:29 PM
1

Of course. But they were just trolling. Trying to get a clip out of me to drag out over on SRS to gain whatever street cred they could with an "OMG this guy just said all women are selfish". I wasn't gonna bite. That of course is when I said that some are some are not. From my observation selfishness can be more prevalent in women than in men, however, not in all by any stretch and also the the source of that selfishness may easily be attributed to girls being raised in on a steady diet of princ…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 08:43 AM
1

the statement i responded to here was a troll trying to Kafka trap me into agreeing that women are as a whole inherently selfish. I wasn't buying it. But instead commented what you read above.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 08:00 AM
1

Thanks for that. But I have written them off. I don't have time for nonsensical debates and personal attacks. I stated an opinion, stated that it was opinion, and made no illusion that my opinion was somehow superior to others. So really they were just off base and searching for conflict.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:48 AM
1

I think you need some time somewhere nice. Like a beach or whatever it is that makes you happy (if anything makes you happy) Your raving personal attacks and obvious desire to take offense from an innocuous comment that wasn't even directed at you, are sure signs that you need a break. Maybe you have surrounded yourself with anger and negativity and now you are so stuck in a hopeless world of shit that you feel compelled to get enraged by nothing. I'm not going to respond to you further because …
/r/MensRights13/11/12 03:36 AM
0

I agree with you. I just got lost between the literal aspect and the sarcastic one.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:44 PM
1

Not really. The difference being that of attitude. What you say may be true in a philosophical axiom. But that is neither here nor there. One being able to generalize in positives but not in negatives shows a leaning toward optimism. And that is nothing to be ashamed of. I did not say one type was valid while another was invalid. I only stated a personal preference. You can embrace your pessimistic world view. I choose not to. I will end this debate here because I have no interest in having an i…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:43 PM
2

The inclusion of "Rape" and "War" in your statement still leave me perplexed.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:25 PM
2

??? blink blink ????
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:08 PM
1

No problem. I can't take full credit I got that from a Costa Rican friend years ago.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:55 PM
1

That is one microscopic Nit you just picked. Well done. In general I like women. I do not like feminist theory worshiping mindles drama queens. I have no problem with you finding some odd flaw in my unwillingness to use generalities in a negative but willing to do so in positives. I don't think all redditors are petty trolls who get off on samantic arguments. I like reddit.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:53 PM
1

What are you talking about? I didn't lump anyone together in any all encompassing way, positive or negative. Was there generalization and opinion? Of course. Being that this is a social media site and not a scientific journal that is of no consequece.There are a lot of trolls under the bridge today.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 09:37 PM
2

No. I actually like women to be different from men. The differences are what makes me attracted to them as a hetero male. You are failing in your attempt to trap me into your game. I stated on many occasions that I don't agree to these blanket asessments. Take your snare and bait elsewhere. Have fun.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:08 PM
2

I thought so, since the responses seem to reek of Kafka trap bait. The first response I figured maybe being tongue in cheek. the following were give aways.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:04 PM
1

Haha. I'll take your word for it. If you are who your user name implies he mentioned you in the blog specifically. Stated that he was not "sure" but suspected you to be "male brained" thus you have no ulterior motives for your involvement in MR. And that you are truely here due to empathy for the cause. He said the same of GWW.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:53 PM
2

In many ways, a fairly large percentage of them are. More so on average than men in most areas. I can't say if I have yet decided if it is by nature or programed and supported by society. I like women though so I am reluctant to lump all of the sex together into a negative character asessment. For good or ill, I'm just not down with that.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:36 PM
5

Essentially that same mechanism. A good analogy would be; You have two moms with kids who ride the bus, both moms say that the bus should stop at each house to pick up the kids for safety reasons. The district decides that they can only make one stop. Both moms now demand that stop be at their house and the other kid can walk to the stop. School decides that a single stop in the middle of the two houses would be most fair. Both moms pissed and sue. Essentially they push for a concession that ben…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:00 PM
9

While it may be a bit of a biased observation, one of the leading voices in MGTOW adressed this in a video and called for a degree of caution when giving credit to women of this type for their support of MR. He sated, (paraphrasing) that women with sons may tend to support MR issues. However, they do so only for their child. They don't support MR issues as a whole, and if they had assurances that their sons would not be affected by gender discrimination they would not give a thought to MR. He go…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:25 PM
6

Spider monkey. They never release the first vine until they have a grip on the next one.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:59 PM
5

Yep. Spot on. Funny though how the status quo with feminism as well as most other special interest groups is Victim first mentality. Making people notable for their disadvantages is not how you treat them like "normal" people or equals.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 08:52 PM
4

We need more men in professorial and teching positions. We need men teaching boys and girls on all levels. The one sided perspective is failing to produce well rounded results. Though the liklihood of growing numbers of male teachers and professors is slim in an ever increasingly malephobic society.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 06:39 PM
6

No. At the onset of womens and gender studies programs, professors from the english department were pulled to form the cariculum. Qualifications?? Hate men, be bitter, self richeousness.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:20 PM
12

This is true. But look into who it was that determined that that was the best aproach to the handicapped. Women in special education. They project their need for baseless praise onto any other "disadvantaged" group. This is why we have political correctness, and every other social marxist practice. Where I worked with the handicapped they worked off of a different model. It's premise is that you just treat people normally and don't focus on the disability. Relegate it to a secondary aspect as op…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 03:31 PM
4

Sorry to hear that. I am a strong believer in fighting to preserve a marriage. However if one partner refuses to own the issues they create, even if the relationship does hold, it will be a one sided dictatorship. The one who cannot be faulted becomes an unchecked ruler over the other and that is the worst kind of relationship hell. I have known men who have done it. Traded away their voice to keep from making waves. They are just as crushed and damaged as the typical picture of the abused house…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:08 PM
3

Possible. But then who is to say that the separation was not prompted by her manipulating herself a loophole through which the new cock she already had eyes on could slip? I have known both men and women to pull the "we need a break to sort things out (AKA get funky without guilt)" move.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 05:57 PM
15

That depends. If your ex was willing to accept her fault in matters, maybe, if not, it was doomed regardless.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:55 PM
1

Either I missed my sarcasm tag, or people on reddit are so entranced by Obama that they can't even see fault in his blatant pandering to the feminists.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:24 PM
-2

Why care about the 50% of society that sucks at everything by comparison to the other 50%? Especially if the other half has their heels on.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:41 AM
1

No Problem. Glad to help.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:35 AM
2

No problem. I hope you didn't feel I was being hostile. I just find it all too common for people to be immature when discussing issues such as this. If your guy cares about your personal feelings in this he will be fine with complying with your wishes. As long as you are not placing unfair double standards on him such as (you cant go to bachelor parties because of strippers but I will be attending a friends dildo sales party next weekend)etc. there is no problem with asking him to respect your f…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:45 PM
2

The people you were with at that bachelor party were scumbags. Not ordinary guys doing what guys will do. Scumbags. Either that or you are full of crap.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:26 PM
3

Unless bachelor parties where you come from involve the attendees cock-slapping women in the face, this is a false comparisson. Watching a porno and acting in one are different entirely. I read your response below to a similar point and I have to say that, No "women" are not universally drawn to getting attention. That is more of a habit of immature and insecure women. If you don't want your BF to attend bachelor parties where there are strippers try talking to him like an adult. Don't demand, o…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:24 PM
4

Would this be extended to the porography industry? I only ask because I am trying to figure out what the true reason is behind the introduction of the prop. If it only carries the ability to effect prostitution I fail to see the net gain of government. However, if it can be extended to include porn, I can see why Cali would be pushing it. Cali sees huge revenue in the porn industry, they are the center of porn in this nation, they are also broke. There is no way they are going to collect $500,00…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:22 PM
1

That was a very good read. That woman seems to have a firm grasp on the reality of equality. While I don't agree with her every stance, I cannot deny the logical thought which brought her to them. I find ir interesting that each and every derailment of the feminist movement enumerated by Ms. Paglia was at the hands of ideological feminists, and that each one was a progression of social Marxism and Victim mentality, capped off by the complete sell out of the movements ideal with the Clinton-Lewin…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 07:14 PM
3

In a way I actually like that they make this argument. It drops the focal point of the issue square in their own lap and they don't even know it. Guy gets hurt, his peers respond with positivity and when girl gets hurt let the victim blaming begin. It admits without admitting that other females are the ones doing the slut shaming and judging. They point the finger at themselves and don't even recognise it.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:24 PM
2

Your welcome man. One will suffice.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:12 AM
3

Hope you are not serious. Because actually using two condoms at the same time causes frition between the two and more frequent failure.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 08:31 PM
2

Maybe they were using the dishonest stat of how many women died in WWI.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:45 PM
6

You would think that would be the case. But we all know that the majority of men still rise to the worm, no matter how hook scarred their mouth may already be.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:35 PM
3

A single mother who A) does not claim child support from her childrens father because he is not in any position to pay it and she understands that. B) Has a SO who also does not support her children outside of covering his portion of the household bills which are split evenly. C) Has stated that if for any reason her current relationship with her SO should disolve she would not expect nor demand he pay her support. So yea she is not quite of the same calibur as the women we do not support. And s…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:33 PM
13

I would say the most likely method would be showing many female soldiers dead. A propiganda campaign to assault the guilt of men by implying that these women died doing a mans job. That and comments like the Hillary "the real victims of war" quote.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 04:14 PM
1

Kind of. I don't say I am pro choice though because I really don't like it. But again it's not my life so not my call.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:08 AM
3

That's about right. I may have misunderstood because you said rape is mostly not a crime of opportunity.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:32 PM
4

You are misunderstanding me entirely, as well as misunderstanding what a crime of opportunity is. Predisposition has to exist in the rapist for the crime to happen. That is why there is a clear distinction between the rapist and the ordinary man. Most rapes are however crimes of opportunity. There are few rapes that occur because a person plans, sets up and executes a rape. These are committed by what would be called pathological rapists. They create the opportunity. Most rapes however are spur …
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:19 PM
5

This depends upon the type of rapist, and even if the rapist has done so before. The majority of first time rapes for someone who does so pathologically is almost always an opportunistic crime. A situation presents its self to someone with fantasies of rape and domination and the take a chance. This is often how pathological criminals are caught, by finding the first victim knowing that this is the crime they did the least prep to conceal and was likely the sloppiest. Date rape is obviously a cr…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 05:51 PM
2

And conversely the do not have to abort. They can choose the solution they want. And I believe that they are capable of making a choice that is not entirely selfish. You seem to feel that, even if she agrees to carry to term and give the child to her SO, that she is somehow doing wrong. That if she does not want the child she must abort it. Who is really trying to decide for her here?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:52 PM
7

She is acting like the friendliest troll I have ever seen. And given that the responses guys have been giving are all pretty egalitarian and fair, I would say if she is a troll she must be starving. It's a good topic for discussion don't you agree?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:46 PM
2

Exactly. I have turned down women in my life for being that same way. It is just not something I will ever be a party to. I only get into relationships with women who share my opinion on that issue. I'm glad you never had to deal with that becoming a reality. I know, for myself, it would be something that haunted my conscience.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:30 PM
2

True. But show a feminist a case where a man beats his wife for cheating next to a case of a woman cutting her husbands dick off and they will tell you the first guy belongs in prison and the second guy got what he deserved.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 03:49 PM
1

I'm neutral. Pro life if it involves me. But pro choice when it's none of my damn business. But I call a duck a duck ya know.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 03:30 PM
1

So her postpartum depression is reasonable excuse but his "Depression, sociopathic ideations, and suicidality mean nothing?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:52 AM
8

Always was. We just paper it as something else to make it more palatable.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:43 AM
1

I read all of the discourse. You made some valid points. The OP is reluctant due to the situation he grew up in and his understandable distrust of this issue due to the hand he was dealt in life. His reluctance and misunderstanding led you to be dismissive of him. I understand that this is an often heated movement, but the reaction to the OP was disappointing. And I am not often disappointed on this sub.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:59 PM
1

When you chose to become millitant to descent even from those who simply don't understand your point yes. When you cast asside people for not simply toeing the line of your opinion without even first attempting to present the valid points, YES. And when you start calling total strangers,whome you do not know, trolls YES and not only male feminist but of the SRS calibur. You can chant your GTFOs all day. But I assure you that my speach at the suicide prevention walk I attended last month, detaili…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:24 PM
-1

Peoples experiences often taint their perception. OP was raised by a single mom and had a father that split when he was two. It's a wonder he has any MRM interests at all given that. I think he just needs a better understanding to overshadow his personal fears.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:08 PM
0

I too hope to one day see that same development. And I also donate blood and plasma often. I even wanted to donate marrow but have not had the opportunity to take enough time off work that they reccomend.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:06 PM
0

I answered this above. I can only demand of myself, not society as a whole. That being the case I must choose the lesser of two evils. I fell abortion is wrong, however, I feel children being raised reluctantly by shitty abusive parents is worse.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:03 PM
1

It may seem that way to you, and perhapse there is some truth to that feeling. Many issues faced by adults in this world impact children in similar fashion. The decision to take a new job and move the familly, irreconcilable relationship between man and woman leading to divorce, hell even the decision to try to have a strict dietary regiment may lead to children choking down untold numbers of brussel sprouts. It may suck but in a complicated world full of complex problems children are often the …
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:57 PM
1

I have. They are very fun to watch. Noisy as they are. The zoo has them free ranging. I have had one attempt to pilfer my fries by force. Good times.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:47 PM
1

Haha my local zoo is in the Bronx. So I will allow that they may be abhorrent.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:37 PM
-2

And this is how a rational movement for equality slowly morphs into male feminism.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:36 PM
1

Because, simply, I am a rational man. I accept that we live in an imperfect world where my more stringent ideologies will not hold sway over the billions of differing individuals in society. I realize that my beliefs hold sway over me and me alone. As I said, I only enter relationships with women who share my views and who are just as cautious and responsible as I am. I cannot force the world to hold my views, nor do I expect them to. Even if their choices sadden me, My sadness does not trump th…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:34 PM
3

And if that choice caused you great pain, I truely feel for you. However, I feel that in the interest of EQUALITY, choice shoild be granted universally to both parties. If you were to quantify your KEEP it In Your Pants argument to be applied universally, I agree it is an option. Not one most will take, but an option none the less.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:20 PM
1

See my response below. I share your beliefs in regards to life. As does my current SO and every woman I have ever been with. You stated that regardless of your opinion on abortion you advocate for it's availability since you know not everyone shares your belief. That is a very good practice. Don't let that ability to see through your own beliefs fall short of granting men the same understanding you grant to women.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:15 PM
-2

You are an inteligent and eloquent presenter of ideas here. Why dismiss a supporter so redilly, without attempting to explain the difference between the reality of what is being advocated and the OPs fear that we are advocating for irresposible fathers? Your thoughtful insight could potentially help to allay his fears and gain a steadfast supporter.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:11 PM
3

I also share this belief with you. This is why I have only persued relationships with women who share that opinion with me. It is also why I adamantly and diligently practice safe sex. However, just as you advocate for choice for women who do not share your views, perhapse you should considder also supporting the choice of men who do not share your views. As I do.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:09 PM
4

The "keep it in your pants" stance? Do you apply the same rules to women?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:04 PM
1

The ones at the local zoo must be dicks then. I watch them a lot because they are always active while the lions sleep. The ones I watch will display to a female until her mate comes charging and chases him off. Then the mate will display. Kind of like a guy flexing for his lady after pumeling an interested suitor in a bar.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:59 PM
1

True. Though peacocks will fight potential rivals, so the display is directed toward the female by both males involved. The rival conflict is not resolved through display but rather violence.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:43 PM
5

That isn't resentment. It is self preservation. One should not feel compelled to try to preach the Torrah to the taliban.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:41 PM
7

Jopool, First let me tell you that I am sory for the hand life dealt you. Your hardships are not to be cast asside by society, nor is the irresposible action of your "father" to be forgiven. I feel that your personal expirience may taint your opinion in regards to the matter you are discussing here though. Barring a few outlying comments, the majority of the discussion I have read in relation to men having the right to abdicate fatherhood have made it clear that this was in pre-birth conditions.…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:39 PM
1

I somewhat agree with you here. However, someone is blaming a man for this. She is. She is claiming that it is his fault that her life is not what she wanted it to be. Her very motive for the crime, as she stated, was vengance toward him for a perceived wrong. I am aware of cases where men have killed their wives or girlfriends in fits of jealous rage but not of any where a man has murdered his children and offered the defense of "i did it to hurt my wife so she would feel the hurt she causes me…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:20 PM
1

In other words. In the case of these women it is more akin to gorrillas chest thumping than the peacocks plumage. It is a sign of superiority directed at potential rivals as opposed to a matter of courtship aimed toward potential mates.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:10 PM
11

You are acting uppon the assuption that "dropping charges" would constitute evidence of the report being false. I don't think that would or should be the case. The prosecution of false filing would and should be based uppon statements made by the initial accuser which make clear that any accusation on their part was false. Also combination of mitigating circumstances such as motive, and hostility on the part of the accuser. Also it the accused has a verifiable aliby for the time of the supposed …
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:05 PM
14

Well that would be a very telling factor if it were more prevalent in women who took "gender studies". If there is no correlation between the two, and it is evenly increased regardless of what courses were studied, possible inference could be; That women who have a higher sense of not needing a man in their lives are more likely to act agressively in relationships. It could always be a neutral finding that hypotisizes that women who have chosen to actively engage in more success driven (see agre…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:56 PM
5

In this case? There is nothing to be gained through conflict with these people. They have shown themselves to be entirely commited to their biggoted ideology and frankly show evidence of hostile immaturity. When confronted by even neutral questioning by the OP, X and cohorts responded with derision and sarcasm. These people are not in a frame of mind to accept reasoned discourse, nor to see their own flaws. OP has more to loose. The venom dripping from this groups fangs is not simply for show. I…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:35 PM
4

Your radar is set lower than average. :-)
/r/MensRights02/11/12 06:29 PM
38

Results suggest that male violence decreased with higher educational attainment, while female violence increases. I would like to see a study on why this is.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:48 PM
8

Perhaps I can be a bit prideful. But I find your take on this to be little more than a simpering call for pitty. The OP was kind and open minded. He conducted himself respectfully and with decorum. Person X is a self centered biggoted ass. I find no reason why the OP should go to this person practically begging for acceptance. Especially acceptance from a group who dedicates their time to spite, envy, and malice. OP, move on graciously. Don't argue or explain. Just walk away from this.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:23 PM
4

offering to pay HALF for the abortion. Fixed.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:42 PM
1

Early Sufferage movement for women was and is acceptable self centerdness, just as MRM is. Feminism is not. Modern feminism is not concerned for EQUAL rights like those two movements and is therefore different. The reason why MRM has the right to be centric is that noone else is even trying to fix the injustices, just like it was for sufferage. When every polititian is pandering to you, when there are thousands of representative groups fighting for womens rights, When women are actually not only…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:51 PM
0

Meh. That's how you see it.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 01:31 AM
2

Actually I am a male, I am quite vocal about men's rights. And on the border of being a MTOW. I just feel that when anyone, man or woman shows egalitarian views. they should be credited and not put down. Each man on this sub has their own views and I respect them.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 10:08 PM
0

No I don't but that is an extreme case. And honestly if you speak to most mothers with sons in that school, or shools where this has happened before, they would be on the same page as you for the most part. Only a select few would stand up for the woman who was sleeping with their little boy. And those women would show themselves to be poor mothers indeed.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:57 PM
1

You may be right about the average. We are talking about the non-average egalitarian ones. And yes many of them do feel threatened. Not only physically by some crazed radfems but socially. Since as you say the average believe these things, the egalitarians would have to face both the radfems and the greater masses who just don't get it. Becoming a social outcast can be daunting to most.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:56 PM
1

It is just a danger legally. And for me makes no sense. Hell I find it hard enough to find a woman in her early twenties who isn't insanely immature these days. I think it is conditioned into many of them. And last thing Any man needs is an immature woman to run rampant on his sanity.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:00 PM
0

I sypathize with your sentiment. It is a tough puzzle. My issue with the rage over NAWALT is that it may be biased. I get the premise and agree in part, but then we turn around and get enraged when the feminists demonize all men as potential rapists. I just find it hard to completely validate NAWALT while we practice NAMALT. Are all men potential rapists? God no! So stands to reason that not all women are radfem supporters. I also hold a degree of sympathy for women who truely do not buy the fem…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:56 PM
1

Pretty much. But speaking for myself and anyone I worked with in that environment, in the current legal climate I strongly recomend that men avoid these young women with every fiber of their will.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:48 PM
7

Haha. Sorry about that. Bob from accounting was practically pouring Grey Goose into me that night. JK Stuff happens. Gotta have a sense of humor about life.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:08 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing on your take in regards to this 16 year old guy. We just have to watch the gender discrepancy thing. We tend to be predisposed to think of young men as horny little goats and young women as virginal princesses. Those ideas have led us to where we are now.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:18 PM
5

I think I can speak for at least a few members of this community and say, We hope you will be. Though I can understand not wanting to paint that target on yourself.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:16 PM
17

There are lots of you. It can be hard to remember that sometimes when the vocal ones are not reasonable.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:23 PM
22

I once tickled my brothers fiance as she came out of the bathroom when they visited for christmas. It was morning I was half asleep and thought she was my sister and I would spook her. This was also the first I met her so it was embarassing until my brother just dropped on the floor laughing. Now I feel free to harass my sis in law with the same impunity I do my two sisters.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 03:10 PM
8

I once worked a job where I came into frequent contact with young women in group homes, and other "problem children". I have been outright propositioned by girls as young as 13. I have had psychologically ill young women say "F' me or i'll tell the cops you raped me". I have also been hit on by highschool girls in my area. I have had sexual favors offered to me in exchange for buying a young woman alcohol. I have never touched a woman under the age of 18 and I was 17 when that happened. Your bla…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:37 PM
35

Stop the presses. An attractive woman with obviously low moral standards is being glorified by reality TV? Ohh how far we have fallen fron the golden days of Shot Of Love withTilla Tequilla or Jersey Shore, or The Bachelor, or wait a sec. This is buisiness as usual.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:12 PM
0

Exactly.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:38 AM
5

This was the approach taken by Mayor Jiuliani of NYC. He got rid of the porn shops, the street vendors, the litter, etc etc. right down to the guys who used to jump out with a squeegee and a bucket at the red lights to wash your window for a buck. The result. He was mayor between 1994-2000
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:23 PM
1

Flat top, with JC trimmed into the side with some lightning bolts.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 08:02 PM
1

I say this seems the right move. I assume your current wife is on board with it as well. Be sure that she is and if possible, have her with you whenever you visit the court while pursuing this course of action. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:57 PM
2

Thats when you look that lady in the eye and say, "I assume, Madam, that you are aware of what an erection looks like, Feel free to observe my crotch for the durration of the flight if it would aleviate your concerns". Then go directly to jail.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:54 PM
1

I suppose you could put it that way. I see it as an example of "your right to swing your arm ends at the tip of my nose". Not my job to police peoples beliefs. If those beliefs become a tool for excusing the abuse and persecution of those not a part of your belief system, then I will take offense and pass judgement.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 01:09 PM
2

I agree with you. It may not be reddit popular but I have no qualms with religions. It's just the utilitarian translations and dogmas I dislike. Believing in a religion for it's good moral lessons is not a bad thing. Religion in the hands of the wrong people is a tool of control, in the hands of the right people it is a personal freedom.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:41 AM
3

Friday nights right after "Dancing With That Person That Was in That Show That one Season....I Think or was that Telly Sevalas?"
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:12 AM
18

Thanks. I prefer to think of myself as pleasantly insane, but clever works.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:36 PM
4

nice. sounds like a plan
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:03 PM
2

You hold the opinion that quantifies my reasoning. As it is now, yes in those circumstances that can happen. We don't need to open the door further.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 11:02 PM
10

"property of their husbands"? where did this idea come from? Listen, Love is a grand adventure, and for lucky ones can last for their entire lives. But ask yourself this. Do 50% of women just like you go into their marriages without love as their motive? If so why do they get divorced? Your love for your SO may seem to you to be the absolute most pure love in the history of mankind. And I assure you that many of those divorced women out there felt the same. Your emotions, no matter how real they…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:13 PM
2

Not sure what her relationship and work status is, but revisiting costody based on your stable household may help your cause. Talk to a specialized lawyer in your area.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:26 PM
29

Yes. Now stay tuned for another exciting adventure of gender neutral crime fighter X, brought to you by Tide.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:29 PM
2

Nope won't cut it. Not as long as those letter carriers keep jamming their packages into other peoples boxes without express/sober consent. Thank god for that far less rapey E-mail.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:16 PM
2

Feminism isn't about taking the advantages of sexism but not the downfalls, it's about equality of the sexes. You may want to do some research into what modern feminism is pushing for. You seem like a nice person. One who has true egalitarian views. So You should know that the movement you feel should be representative of your ideals is anything but. Femin-ism only cares about females and is incresingly focused on matters of privaledge for women as opposed to equality for all. I'm sorry that fem…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:45 PM
2

NYC is a b!$#. Just do a housing search for rates.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:31 PM
4

Does it count for guys like me who tend to grow out the beard early to mid October and keep it till May?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:26 PM
63

I attended a christian based private highschool. When the dean told me that it I didn't shave and cut my hair I would be suspended indefinately until I complied, I told him that was fine, that I would sit at home and play X-Box with Jesus until they recognised thier stupidity would also have suspended him. This response was frowned upon. Tune in next week for the story of my first day in public highschool.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:20 PM
3

Granted. But without requiring that valid reason for detention is innumerated, X has been detained could be used to cover false detention and trumped up charges. X has been detaind could be, X killed a baby with a flame thrower, or X looked creepy to me. Bottom line is that fredom of information is in place to protect the individual citizen from false imprisonment. It is public perception that is the flawed aspec of this relationship.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:36 PM
2

This debate was both inspirational and disheartening. Davies repeatedly states the irrefutable facts. He then asks the, predominantly femal panel, "Do you agree to the facts that men are more harshly treated by the justice system than women?". The answers given by those panel members; No. No. I do not. But it because of. No. But men don't matter. I have heard what you say as mwaaa mwahh wah wah mwahh. And Men are pigs. On the plus side the truth is being brought to light. The down side is that i…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:30 PM
18

It is a bit tricky though. The reason that arrest reports are made public was orrigionally to avoid abuses by law enforcement. It could be like Guitmo. Just snatch the guy up off the street, tell no one. We don't want that to be happening. I hate what happens to people wrongfully acused though. Make it a tough choice. If only we could change the predisposition of people to judge the accused simply for being accused. That would be the best solution. I won't hold my breath.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 01:53 PM
1

So it is the potential to suffer or actually suffering from the act it's self?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:55 AM
1

Hmmm. Perhapse, I am just reluctant to switch to a model involving a financially interested third party.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:51 PM
1

Yea. Our government sucks. I once read that toilet paper in the whitehouse cost about $6 a roll. And I thought to myself "ahhh, that's why they are so full of S#%, They are just holding it to save us money" I know many non government people do the same thing or simillar. Like having your wife listed as the book keeper for your small business.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:25 PM
2

Escourts can cost about $500.00 - $1k per night. He got a deal. I am with Radium on this one. It may be true that as an 82 year old man his options are lmited, but not that limited. From personal observation; There are a ton of older ladies out there who are alone and would not mind getting together with a financially sound older gentleman. If this old goat wanted a life partner he could have found about a dozen per square mile in the state of Florida. He chose to go with a young trophy because …
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:17 PM
1

Wouldn't an independant for profit agency be quite suseptible to finding in favor of whoever pays them more?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:32 PM
0

Thats true. I personally would rather that money be going to a small business than to the polititians wife though. You have to admit that it is pretty self serving.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:01 PM
1

True. So why not get the implant. You can proove you had it at the time. What you need to realize is that, for a while now, women have had complete unilateral control and that the system is set up in a way where any woman can turn a man into an ATM machine with a one night stand if she wants. Your fear is that men desire to exploit possible loopholes and shirk their responsibility all together. But you are overlooking the fact that women are currently doing that now. I don't advocate for mens pr…
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:48 PM
1

So because of one in 100 individuals who genuinely got pregnant the other 99 guys get screwed? That is assuming optimal circumstances to proove me wrong of course. One can always factor in circumstances as well you know. Like did this one in 100 shot happen to take place while the man and woman were split up and had a one night of nastalgia? Has the woman been pushing for the relationship to move forward even though the man has been reluctant? Has she expressed a desire to have kids even though …
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:57 PM
1

The highest failure rate is 8% Where as condoms, the only male form is 25%. And the subcutaneous female form is <1% that's pretty damn good. By the way the 8% does include outside medications causing failure. And that isn't even mentioning plan B or abortion which are both 100%
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:38 AM
2

Drawing a completely broad connection between an actual fact "women throughout history and also currently in undeveloped parts of the world give birth without all of the perks of modern medicine or the luxury of maternity leave" and nazism is by definition a straw man. It is not feminist conspicacy theory it is fist world dicsonnet is a real thing. Holy fuck. This is not a hard concept to understand. I am losing my patience. You cannot make the child suffer because some woman was dishonest to yo…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:42 PM
2

Simple. If she is on the pill and taking it properly she is not fertile. While it is true that some other medications and conditions can alter the efficacy of the pill that is known and if none of those extraneous factors were present it stands to reason that she stopped taking the pill. All she would have to do in that situation is either utilize other birth controll options untill that situation is resolved. If she does not communicate to her mate that she is on a med or that she missed a day …
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:10 PM
1

First the straw man is the implication that pointing out a fact in regards to women and childbirth is equivalent of "Jew hatred" Don't talk about stretch marks. I'm sorry but while I can agree fully with a womans right to choose I personally find reasons like that to be shallow to the point of personal revulsion. I am discussing those things because they are pertinent to the issue of female monopoly on reproduction. And that my friend is the source of the issue. Any professional in any science b…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:58 PM
2

Again. If a woman wants children she can go ahead and select a mate who also wants and can afford to have children. She has the choices, she has the selectivity, she is responsible for the choice she makes. If a woman choses to have a child with a man who is incapable of supporting that child that is her mistake as she is the one with the options. Should children suffer? No. But if a man rationally tells a woman that he cannot afford to support a child and she cannot afford to support a child sh…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:26 PM
1

Yeah.... I've said nothing unreasonable at all, and the reason I insulted you was because you were being extremely irrational and sexist. Think about if someone was spewing all kinds of shit about Jews not being humans or something. Would you consider it a challenge of your viewpoint and kindly respond with counter-arguments? Pointing out the fact that women have, throughout history, and still do in less developed countries, given birth with far less safety than they do in the modern first world…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:15 PM
3

What source do you want? One of the defining characteristics of a third world country is lack of health care and modern day comforts. Honestly are you being deliberately dense? Women in modern first world countries were having children without medical assistance just over 100 years ago in poorer regions anf 200 years ago even in the upper class. Source? Read a book dude. Or if that poses too much a challenge watch a documentary. The leading diagnostic tool, which totally revolutionized safety du…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:53 PM
4

Hold on tight. Be rational and explain to your employers that you appreciate the opportunity they gave you, however you feel that, due to outside matters you cannot give them the type of performance you would be proud of. That you feel that for the time being at least someone with more to give to the position would suit all parties for the best. Also when you do look for a doctor, I suggest that you find one who can sypathise with your situation. but will also challenge you to get on the right t…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:21 PM
2

Honestly I'm not all that interested in debating someone with your lack of reason. You launch into personal insults when someone disagrees with your stance. This is the killer of all credibility. I did read your edit though and will respond in breif. Your orrigional statement focused only on the abject suffering that is carrying a child in pregnancy. Well I'm not sure how many women you have known who have had kids. I have known many, and can say that the only ones who piss and moan about it are…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:16 PM
4

Don't sweat it man. Do you have health insurance? If so, I suggest you look into seeing a psychiatrist. Now don't get upset and think that is a judgement, or me calling you crazy. I'm not. The things you have said here are classic for chronic depression. When even the things you enjoy have no sway to make you happy, that is a chemical depression. One which happy thoughts won't fix. You need support and likely some antidepressant meds on a temporary basis to carry you through. If you go this rout…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:25 PM
1

That is a crap argument. If I put a 45 slug through someones brain they will not suffer one bit. So by your premise that isn't murder.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 02:02 PM
2

That is what the female body was designed to do. Women in 3rd world countries carry for 9mos. and often give birth in their own beds with little to no help, and they are back to work the next day. I am not saying that it is easy or that all women should do as those women do. But, the reality lies somewhere in the middle. Western women tout pregnancy on a level with having two broken legs and lymphoma. This serves their victim status.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:55 PM
8

Vent away man. Sometimes it is all we have to decompress. When the choice is either vent or hold off until the cork blows the best option is always vent. I hope things turn around for you soon. Until then, remember that self harm is not the answer. The alcohol is also a depressant, try to shave down consumption. Try exercise to wear yourself down for sleep instead.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:45 PM
9

PRISON. "Designed for the male lifestyle" Because men, in their natural element, snjoy such things as close confinement, forced schedules, and the looming possibilities of rapes and shankings. In fact there is little to no difference between the modern prison and the community Elks club. Perhapse the solution is prisons strong enough for a man, but PH ballanced for a woman.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:37 PM
2

When potential employers ask me about multitasking I always tell them "I don't" "I work one task at a time producing optimal results and I move on to the next task" "At the end of my day I want to be proud of the quality of the work I did, not the quantity of shit I shoveled"
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:04 PM
2

Multi tasking is doing many things poorly. Staying on task is doing something exceptionally.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 12:59 PM
1

It is a pretty poor argument though. Women are well aware in most cases that their man is strong. Many women seek men who are athleticly built or even more. Specifically because the perceive them as strong. And they forget that when it suits an argument? I dont think so.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 12:57 PM
-2

Yup.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 12:51 PM
-1

Well for one I did say that it was a problem, just not one that is resultant of mens ideals for women, as is typically inferred. As to your comparative. That is a very poor one. In that scenario you have a perpetrator of violence against someone. That perpetrator is responsible as it is their actions causing the event, regardless of the clothing worn by the victim. In what I said The victim is the person in power. They, as the overwealmingly represented consumers have the ability to set the stan…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:37 PM
0

Female fashion and beauty standards are a pain to live up to. Yes, men have fashion and beauty standards too and women do also get advantages from things like being able to wear makeup, but it's a mixed bag. One could easilly argue that, as fashion and beauty in media are both elements of advertizing and consumerism, and women being 85% of the consumer market, those standards are created and perpetuated by women against women. I am not denying that it is a problem. I'm merely saying that it is a…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 04:59 PM
1

Relax man. A lot of us know. One step at a time.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:41 PM
1

Well if you read it online it must be true, amirite? When referring to what people say online, Yes, the fact that it is said online, makes it true.. Also...Really? More like, if MRAs stopped making shit up about feminists then there wouldn't be an MRM Essentially every link posted on here has citations. All of them. Citations of actual quotes by feminists are not "made up" This is a community that supports ousting people online. It was you who said you wanted to be associated with them, not me. …
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:36 PM
1

Numerous online feminists have reported similar action targeting them. And numerous online feminists call for culling male population to 10%. And numerous online feminists think it is reasonable for all men to cross to the opposite side of the street after dark if they are going to pass a woman going the other way. What numerous online feminists claim in regards to their victim status is at best questionable. Yes, because that's the most that can be said about feminists. If that were all that co…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:54 PM
4

That is a shame. Your husband is lucky enough to have a woman who has no interest in playing the victim card or following the biased feminist dogma. And he is still conditioned so deeply to follow these inane rules for men that he would take Watsons side. It reminds me of when my friend adopted a retired show dog. He had to teach it that it was ok to bark and play sometimes.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:05 PM
1

I hope that, given time, the PTA and local government step in on this one. These three women work for the community. They are paid by tax payers. As such they should be answerable to them. And yes I say three women, because while the teacher herself is primarilly at fault here, the principal and assist. super intendent have been complicit in wronging these boys. They have exposed themselves as possible bigots, but definately as working together to cover the wrongfull actions here. All three shou…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:23 PM
1

Personally I don't condone that type of subreddit. However, if what was being done there was indeed illegal, there are legal channels one can use. Such as calling federal internet crimes division of the FBI. What was done does not pursue legal prosecution, but rather illegal persecution and possible vigilantism. That has never been nor will it ever be condoned by a civilized society. As far as the women labeled as "Bigot" on that list go. That is hardly as damaging as what was said about VC. And…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:03 PM
1

You couldn't be more right. I know the difference between the dude who mugged me when I was 14, and the lady who used to bring me home made fried chicken and mac N Cheese because "His white AZZ is too skinny". God I miss that lady. My mother of another color
/r/MensRights17/10/12 08:35 PM
3

1965-76 seems to have been almost a 50/50 split. Which I guess bassed on typical split being 54% female 46%male that is major minority status for females :) I don't think there has ever been a time that men outnumbered women. War has a history of ensuring that.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:47 PM
1

But the difference is that VC was never convicted of a crime. Those posted on register her have. If you want to ignore that major difference I will be patiently awaiting your call for a ban of the sex offenders regestry.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 05:43 PM
3

You are likely right. My experience with inner city people has however been with African Americans in an overwhelming majority. And all anecdotal observations I can base on, are of that group. It was not intended as a racial statement and I did not see it that way when I typed it. I appreciate your pointing it out though and I will edit it.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:56 PM
12

Whoppi is in a great position to have a more understanding perspective of this. She understands, as does the other African American lady, how people can be in the inner city. Many on here and elsewhere say this was overkill by the driver. I can only assume that they have never dealt with an angry inner city woman. They could just as easily pull a blade and cut you up in some cases. I'm not making a blanket statement. I have seen the results of a pissed off woman like this. Straight razor cuts fr…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:10 AM
14

Did Yoko go on to have a completely tallentless band sell hundreds of thousands of albums to a fan base established by her dead husband? Did she go on to star in shitty movies where the role she played was basically herself? Was there a long history of Yoko verbally abusing John while he was alive? Nope. Is John Lennons picture on that sign? Nope.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:14 PM
28

Let's not forget how Cobain continued to benefit his heroin addicted trash bag of a wife even after he died. The perfect man mouldering in a grave while his widdow spends his fortune and rides on the coat tails of the fame he suffered for.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:48 PM
2

Hers. I have seen many cases like hers. Drama and danger become their only way to validate themselves. They actively seek chaos. Best is this woman does not have a kid. I knew one who frequently had her 16 year old daughter driving at 3AM to picke her up from random hotells where she had been ditched by whatever guy. At least one time she was cuffed to the bed naked and bruised. And that was by a man she actively dated for 4 months, after that event. Her daughter spent her time hitting on and th…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:25 PM
1

Typical behavioral manifestation of borderline personality disorder.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:23 PM
0

It is not rare at all. In fact, every school I attended in my life trained us to have the girls form up first for exit in fire drills. I have read accounts of sinking ships and down airplains who follow the same women and children first rule.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter