TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IgnatiusBSamson Archive

View 1 posts and 744 comments by IgnatiusBSamson on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

StoryIgnatiusBSamson/r/MensRights13/03/15 05:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I want to understand for the good men that are out there You could study your phrasing here alone for 100 years like a monk reciting a Zen koan. ...the good men that are out there. Are men by default not good? Can you judge them all as one big group? Why are only good men worthy of understanding and love? Etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/23 07:38 AM
1

If you’re actually ignorant enough to believe fascists only belong to parties named “fascist”, then you need to go back to your schoolbooks and study for a very long time before you get yourself involved with bad people. Half the time they have innocuous-sounding names: the Cross of Fire. The Five Star Movement. The Brothers of Italy. People who praise Mussolini are fascists. Meloni is a fascist. She’s popular because she’s virulently anti-immigrant and appeals to Italians’ very real sense of re…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:42 PM
0

your country is more patriotic No it isn’t. It’s more jingoistic and bloodthirsty, which is what you really meant with your weasel-word “patriotic.” Hence Meloni’s virulent anti-immigration stance and advocacy of letting boats of migrants sink. fascists were against religion No they weren’t. they were socialists. No they weren’t, you fucking moron. They fought with Communists in the streets under Rohm, outlawed them once they came to power, abolished labor unions, and initially set up concentrat…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:25 AM
-1

I mean her political party is the Fratelli d’Italia, the literal successor party to the Italian fascist movement. I mean she is a fascist. She has given speeches praising Mussolini. I don’t believe for a second you are ignorant of what a fascist is. I’m going to hazard a guess you’ll respond with some asinine “oh so everyone you don’t like is a fascist!” To which I counter with this. Fascists are not allies of men. They want to use our bodies as labor objects and meat in their grinder.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 11:18 PM
-2

Mmm yes I’m sure a fascist has no ulterior motive in appealing to aggrieved masculinity. Just like Hitler had nothing in mind by co-opting a “workers’” party before banning labor unions... You’re fucking braindead. It’s the same as Hawley telling men “put down the porn, ask a girl out” — right-wingers and fascists want you back on the plantation.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 05:01 PM
1

Shut the fuck up you moron. Actually, I don’t think you’re a moron: I think you’re a fascist apologist. In which case you’re just a fascist prick. here’s an example. here’s another. Morons like you two are why nobody takes us seriously — and if we go the direction of simping for fascists, they shouldn’t. “Oooo you don’t understand, she’s just against the current trend” get fucked.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:57 PM
-6

Why are you posting a speech from a literal fascist? “This just in — Mussolini says Italians must return to the family.” The devil can quote scripture to suit her purpose. Fucking embarrassing.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:27 AM
7

Please, Concern Troll, let men have their own spaces where they can compare notes unpoliced by what you consider gauche. The door is that way.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:42 PM
6

why am I the only one asking this? Have you been living under a rock for the past 13 years?
/r/MensRights15/01/23 05:53 PM
10

Because they’re labor objects.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/23 06:31 PM
8

Do you think it's even necessary to have the "positive" in front of masculinity? No. This phrase is invented by the types of people every red-blooded man loathes. They are telling on themselves. They feel the need to add the "positive" adjective because, in their mind, "masculinity" is by-default negative and must be corrected. The feminists et al are doing powertalk disguised as straight-talk. They're subliminally coaching men to act in accordance with their preferred paradigm (i.e. of maximum …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/23 10:37 PM
2

I hope you wake up to the evil of the medical establishment against men’s bodies. If not — You give me a call when yours goes wrong, now.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 06:48 PM
2

Ah, yes - anecdotes, the plural of which is “data.” You should learn to listen to older men cautioning you from their hard-won experience out in the trenches. Vasectomy is seriously risky for your health. It’s ultimately a personal decision to make, but do not believe the cutters, or your girlfriend who read a 3-page article in New York Times Magazine, that it is impossible to mess up. They both have agendas. You seem like a pleasant person. Ta.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 06:22 PM
1

The guys on that subreddit have anecdotes of acquiring autoimmune syndrome post-vasectomy. In the scientific literature, you won’t find it. All literature on vasectomy and its (alleged non-) consequences is sponsored by the American Urological Association, which has its obvious agenda. If you’re on the fence: don’t get one.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 05:12 PM
2

Check out the boys in r/postvasectomypain for starters.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 05:00 PM
5

Do not let women like this, and the medical lobby, gaslight you into believing vasectomy isn't dangerous. This guy's 15% statistic on recurrent pain is correct. If you're unlucky, it can also cause impotence, autoimmune disease, hormone deficiency, the whole nine yards. This is the logical endpoint of a society that treats male bodies as disposable labor objects. They mutilate our intimate organs as a matter of course when we come into this world and put the yield into rich ladies' beauty treatm…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 09:40 PM
0

Oh. Yeah, this is all a bunch of sophist bullshit, but you’re a skilled spinner. You’re bending terms to align with your beliefs then stating those beliefs as “fact.” E.g. the MAGA movement being working class, fucking lol. Trump’s biggest base of support is the petit bourgeoisie - his “beautiful boaters,” the regional gentry. There’s disaffected working-class among them, hence the 207 counties that went from Obama to Trump in 2016 - but if the MAGA movement were working-class, it would have pro…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 05:45 PM
1

I’m not sure why you’re so set on insisting on a monolithic “West.” That’s way too broad, and I suspect you know it. I also suspect you know that there isn’t one single left-wing ideology. Ask 6 leftists the best path forward, you’ll get 16 answers. I’m also not sure why you’re ranting against the PMC, it’s like bad Ehrenreich. My 2 cents, as a grunt worker - yes, they are absolutely parasitic and have significant false consciousness, and they’ve undergone a symbiotic ideological finishing schoo…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 03:51 AM
1

Yeah that’s not even close to accurate, it’s at best a willful misinterpretation. The PMC absolutely has taken the reins of liberal political discourse in this country - I won’t even address that you waved a hand and claimed this syndrome is true of the entire “West” - which is by its very nature anti-left wing. (For example - that’s why Biden crushed the rail strike a few weeks back.) They hoovered up theories which were originally proposed by Marxists: e.g. colonialization, land-back, second s…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 04:52 PM
4

On the whole, my experience there is pretty decent. There’s several competing strains: hyper-academy types who couch almost every critique in critical theory language and tend to make excuses for cultural animus less ideological but still aggrieved men’s partisans revanchists who seem to not comprehend the “left wing” in the title. If anything, I would question the sub’s “left-wing” bona fides - it seems soft-left at best, and that soft-left is solely cultural, not economic. When I espouse actua…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 09:37 PM
2

almost all major societies over the past 5000 years have been anti-gay Oh boy, I have some really bad news for you about the Greeks, Romans, Babylonians, pre-Islamic Arabs, Persians, Native Americans, Canaanites, and Thais. Putin isn’t a fascist, dum-dum. He is a far-right oligarch. Those aren’t identical. Fascism emerges at a particular point in the development of political economy - “capitalism in decline.” Once the imperial relation has broken down and rate of profit has fallen, immigrants fr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/22 09:45 PM
8

FUCK Bell Hooks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/22 05:21 PM
10

Now you’re saying outright ignorant things and bending over backwards to justify fascism. “Trump is fascist because he tried to overthrow the electoral results.” That’s not what fascism is. But while you’re on that week topic, fascists get elected all the time. Famously, Hitler. It’s a weak barometer. Racializing the welfare state is fascist. Anti-Semitism is too. Nativist politics, not allowing LGBT to adopt. Are you really going to hair-split in an attempt to defend a party that was founded by…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/22 07:21 AM
1

do they become fascist by cooperating with the SD Yes. And unless I’m misreading or my news sources are mistaken, they’re the largest single party, not the second-largest. Do you remember a few days ago, where Giorgia Meloni “exposed” the colonial dollar foisted upon Africans in France’s colonies, and its ability to economically enslave them? It’s an unequivocally true argument, bewitching in its frankness, and everyone was taken in by it. Then BAM, she hits the second half of the speech, where …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/22 06:54 AM
5

“The party has been characterized as national-conservative, anti-immigration, anti-Islam, Euroskeptic, and far-right...founded in 1988, the Sweden Democrats had its roots in Swedish fascism as well as white nationalism.” “ In 2017, members of the Sweden Democrats' leadership defended comments made by then US President Donald Trump in response to Trump's assertion that Sweden's migration and asylum policies had led to a rise of terrorism and crime in Sweden.” “The SD wants European governments to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/22 06:48 AM
5

I think anyone who takes the rhetoric of a majority-fascist parliament (which Sweden now has) is naive. The fascist never uses language responsibly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/22 11:41 PM
2

There are few enough women that you’ll be fine. You’re making a mountain out of a molehill. In striking - dont spar with women, unless you feel like practicing defense and taking the round off from offense. In grappling - go 50% intensity, try to be as correct as possible. That’s pretty much it. If you put in the effort to find legit schools (i.e. with competent, experienced instructors) 90% of this pre-screening will be done for you.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 06:03 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHckeZoYx04
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/22 04:54 PM
8

He isn’t switching parties, he’s donated millions of dollars to the Republican Party. Don’t be a Musk cuck.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 08:04 PM
1

Just wait til you find out one of the big insurers lobbied to reduce the serum testosterone ranges from 300-1100 ng/dL to 150-900 ng/dL. Which means not only if your doctor sees 200, he’ll probably shrug and say “well, it’s in range” - even if he’s wise to it, insurance will refuse to cover. That having been said, do not get only your serum levels checked. Test also at minimum free T, SHBG, estradiol, vitamin D, LH, and FSH.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:26 PM
5

I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to respond to a beloved studio releasing what seems to be an openly bigoted film and even capitalizing on anti-male hatres in their marketing, and it's very frustrating to see that so many people are either ambivalent or in open support of the film and it's seemingly misandristic message. I felt this way watching stupid Promising Young Woman during the opening scene when the middle-manager guys are discussing how best to rape Carey Mulligan. You know that annoyin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/22 06:22 PM
0

Liberalism was the political philosophy of slave-owning Enlightenment philosophes, created in the 1700s to reconcile a schizophrenic taxonomy that championed universal liberty while putting millions in chains to assist in capital accumulation. So where is the redeeming quality you seem to find in it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 07:18 PM
1

You win. Those are both way worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/22 06:00 AM
15

From Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics, page 106: No one can truly believe that the young black males involved in the Central Park incident were not engaged in a suicidal ritual enactment of a dangerous masculinity that will ultimately threaten their lives, their well-being. If one reads Michael Dyson’s piece “The Plight of Black Men,” focusing especially on the part where he describes the reason many young black men form gangs - “the sense of absolute belonging and unsurpassed love”…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 05:41 PM
12

She said some of the most barbaric shit about black men. My jaw hit the floor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/22 08:44 AM
8

Oftentimes, yes. Like I said, you can’t reason someone out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into. Arguing with feminists often takes that trajectory. That having been said, if they go that route and you elect to keep engaging, I’d fire back something like “why the evasion? Do you deny that hatred of men is bigotry like hatred of black people is racism? Or no?” You really have to do the “meta” of arguing with a feminist, because they’re experts at cloaking power-talk as straight-talk a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 06:39 PM
69

“I know not all black people are criminals, but despite being only 14% of the population they commit 52% of all murders. Do you see how fucking racist that sounds?” It doesn’t go over well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 08:15 AM
5

No. But I’m also not dumb enough to ever bring it up in left spaces.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 06:04 AM
1

There must be some dust in my eye. I had a botched circumcision that turned my cock into a grizzle stick. Thank you for seeing reason, I don’t want any more of me to be made.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:50 AM
2

This hurts
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:04 AM
2

I listened to this story on the radio this morning and thought the same goddamn thing.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:46 AM
23

I’ll use whatever term I like. Get fucked.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 10:40 PM
17

God dammit finally a female who gets it.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:01 PM
2

Shocker.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:56 AM
4

“Obey” isn’t even in the male version of the vows.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 09:08 PM
1

I know. I was clarifying for the guy who seemed confused as to the context.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:35 AM
8

I think he meant that it was invented by a DeBeers marketing campaign.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:28 PM
2

Nice, you buy ME a ring!
/r/MensRights17/02/18 10:27 PM
2

No, that’s not the best counter argument I can come up with. (Although I do find this article particularly moronic, and totally unrelated to men’s rights.) Just off the top of my head, some better arguments: 1) your article is from a fake-news peddling, capitalist-friendly website that regularly spews dreck. 2) the cable companies received $400B of taxpayer money to build fiber optic network, didn’t complete the network, and incurred no penalties. Now they’re trying to throttle and restrict (pub…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 04:51 AM
2

This is the dumbest fucking shit I’ve ever seen posted here.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:40 PM
2

I'm sad that this is progress...but I'm glad to see the progress.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 10:33 PM
5

Don't tell me that many women don't want to become real adults. Your example requires an individualistic spirit, and a hefty amount of risk. Why pay for all your own shit, and maybe lose out, when there's dumb schlubs who will pay for all that shit just for a chance to be with you?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 04:05 AM
10

I think the conclusion to draw is that women want the "good" parts of old-fashioned gender roles (e.g. free food, chivalry, romance) without the "bad" parts (e.g. restriction in employment).
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:52 AM
7

quite appalled that the plurality of womynz In my admittedly anecdotal experience, most women are like this re: dating.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 03:45 AM
5

It's not "pursuit of property" in Locke. It's just "property" (one of the three tripods of English landed gentry). It was the founding fathers, chief among them Thomas Jefferson, who made the (last-minute) change to "pursuit of happiness."
/r/MGTOW31/08/17 08:09 PM
5

Asians study hard, graduate, have strong family groups, and it got them somewhere in life. You're painting with too broad a brush here. There's a stark difference between the experience of East Asians (e.g. Chinese, Japanese, Koreans) vs Southeast Asians (e.g. Indochinese, Indonesian, Malay). For the former the trajectory you describe is absolutely true to a large extent; for the latter they might as well be a different race with regard to their income, educational attainment, health outcomes, e…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 06:44 PM
2

Hey, if a woman expects a king/queen dynamic, sure. But in the wise words of Aladdin, "You got it...and everything that goes with it."
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:53 PM
2

She conveniently leaves out that a queen lives in service to the king.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:48 PM
8

Your annotations made me laugh. The article presented, however, gave me cancer. 0/10 would not read again.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:23 AM
1

Precisely.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 05:57 AM
5

No. Men get in fewer accidents, but those accidents are more likely to be serious or fatal. Women get in more, but those accidents are more likely to be fender benders.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 07:27 PM
2

Yeah I was talking about out-of-the-closet adult gay men, not in-the-closet teens.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:26 AM
1

Women also vote more frequently in state and local elections than men.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 05:38 PM
3

So I hear. I like to focus on the positives.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:39 AM
6

I envy y'all. No "oopsie" pregnancies.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:36 AM
1

men vote more than women No we don't.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:21 AM
7

Hope you got an (enforceable) pre-nup for when that "ridiculously anti-feminist" ex decides she wants HALF
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:01 AM
1

I mean, I certainly hope so.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 10:15 PM
1

So much man-shaming in one comment!
/r/MensRights27/10/15 05:04 AM
1

Good.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 09:48 PM
0

No, it doesn't. My factual evidence speaks for itself in that regard. I call you a moron over and over because you say moronic things over and over. And because it lessens my mental anguish that there are intellectually lazy bastards like you out there in the world.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:01 PM
1

Ad hominem. also, you weren't agreeing: you were insisting that the take-home point is that war is bad for everybody. Which is not the take-home point of the comment to which I was replying: the OP of said comment was wrong, in a purely factual sense.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:00 PM
0

go fuck yourself. You were arguing with kept insisting that war wasn't "bad" for women in a gendered way in the 20th century. He was wrong. Not knowing history, and arguing our movement based solely on theory, does not help us. In summary, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:59 PM
1

Absolution*
/r/MensRights05/06/15 09:49 PM
0

bypassing the point I made. The "point" you made was no point at all: you said something as childish and inane as "the sky is blue, daddy." And now you've doubled down on it. Yep, you just did the same thing all over again: ignored any direct charges or nuance and instead proceeded with the imprecise "but war hurts everybody guyz." While this statement is true, it falls short: war affects different people in different ways. For example, more men die (as more men are combatants); more young than …
/r/MensRights04/06/15 12:46 AM
1

war never changes Let's avoid quoting Fallout to try and legitimate our arguments. (Moron.) There was never a war where innocents didn't get caught in crossfire. Avoiding my point... There was never a war where someone didn't rape or get raped. Still avoiding my point... war is hell. Oh good, you've moved from Ron Perlman to Sherman. That's an upgrade I suppose. That's what I know from my history books. Oh I get it, you're 19. Here is the evidence I am talking about, you sweet summer child: -Nan…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 08:51 PM
0

Cool story brah, but that is an overgeneralization that does not address the particulars of history. For example: the weaponization of rape in WWII by the Soviets (fall of Berlin); Japanese (Rape of Nanking); and in Vietnam by U.S. soldiers (Tet Offensive). Learn your history, you fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 08:39 PM
-4

WWII and Vietnam beg to differ.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 07:28 PM
-1

OH MY GOD A FEMINIST JUST PRESENTED A POSITION I AGREE WITH STOP THE PRESSES
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:06 PM
1

Cry foul.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 11:36 PM
1

This comment is awesome.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:15 PM
3

Republic with a strong tradition of representative democracy influenced by New England Puritan town dynamics, Iroquois confederacy, Roman Republic, and Golden Age Athens.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:46 AM
4

Already a thing at some U.S. colleges, including the University of Michigan.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:45 AM
2

That anchor was having a very hard time keeping quiet.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:42 AM
4

Oh for fuck's sake. If you're comfortable arguing tooth and nail against someone you love (emotionally draining, potential to build resentment, potentially injurious to the relationship because it's hard to separate debates from feels) have at it. If not, dump her.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:39 AM
7

I mean...it's Alternet. The hell do we expect.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 06:23 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:02 PM
4

I just giggled malevolently.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:55 PM
4

Second- and third-wave feminism actually do this exhaustively: they try to deny human sexual dimorphism. Camille Paglia actually has a relevant anecdote about it, where a feminist at a conference tried claiming that (I'm paraphrasing) "all the differences in men and women are due to socialization, not biology." The disastrous "opening" of combat jobs to women in the U.S. armed forces has given the lie to this myth: and consequently, they have had to lower standards, and thereby readiness (which …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 05:41 AM
–

When women can do all their pullups, pushups, and situps, can run as fast and frequently as a man without stress fractures, carry 100# of kit, during battle, and climb up onto buildings and across topographical obstacles in that kit, and drag an injured buddy out of the fight in that kit, all while not slowing men down, and while not destroying esprit d'corps, avoid getting pregnant and getting medevac'ed, be able to spend months in the field, and can piss and shit in uniform without getting ser…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:06 PM
1

Ahhh good ol' SAPR. Takes me back. Bear in mind, OP, that sodomy is still illegal under the UCMJ. So you can be gay in the military...just not have sex.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:39 AM
4

And yet they still refuse to attribute the higher education gap to sexism.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:32 PM
3

sexist against men of course Remember, in the opinion of many feminists, sexism against men is impossible, because men have institutional power, and sexism requires institutional power + discrimination (which they do not believe women have).
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:05 PM
1

This would make you an egalitarian. Feminists believe that, globally, women are objectively "worse off" and advocate preferentially advancing women's causes to correct perceived inequalities.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:03 PM
2

It's perverse that I laugh at that kind of thing now.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:21 PM
3

I hear this constantly. Not just when people die, but when fired from a job. "Steve got let go today, his poor kids..."
/r/MensRights03/04/15 10:21 PM
15

If a man dies, his wife is the victim god dammit right in the feels. Every fucking news article does this.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 07:03 AM
2

fellating*
/r/MensRights02/04/15 06:54 PM
3

Hey, me too.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:12 PM
2

We agree. Boys need adult men in their lives.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:03 AM
5

Once I'm better off, I am doing this so hard.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 05:30 AM
5

The way he elongates that "r" when he says roomy is just so perfect for Lecter.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:07 PM
11

You just made me snort coffee all over my keyboard.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:15 PM
22

robust This word means "tough" or "hearty". You're thinking of a word like "stout."
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:52 PM
21

I bet she can't fit in a rowboat
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:51 PM
–

"She's amazing!" They do this re: their friends all the goddamn time. "Well Holly is soooo hot, so if Larry doesn't want to hook up with her consistently, there's something wrong with him!"
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:48 AM
12

This is awesome.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:47 AM
5

Them's the breaks, dog. You can accept it or go gay. Personally, I'm holding out for a PlayStation compatible blowjob attachment.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:49 AM
1

I agree. What I am saying is that women make fun of men in a very gendered way: they pick out the elements of their person (wealth/status/looks/hair/etc.) that make the men seem to be of lesser social and sexual value to pick on them. Society values men with resources, be they personal or monetary; it despises men without them.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 08:21 AM
1

I'm guessing you mean Jessa, the one with the English accent. I vaguely recall that story arc. No surprise she was comforted by Hannah.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 08:19 AM
2

the female-on-male domestic violence apologia on Girls Where?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:01 PM
3

Because nobody gives a shit about men, especially not about men without indicators of status (hair/money/job/property/etc.).
/r/MensRights27/03/15 08:58 PM
1

if men are evenly split They won't be. Hillary does not do well with men, especially working-class whites, which she needs to at least not lose entirely if she wants to win the election. Same with Hispanics - Clintons are weaker there than Obama ever was. Granted, the alternative will be some asshole.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:45 AM
0

Bi doesn't mean a complete 50/50 split of attraction. Yeah, that holds some water. I suppose it's like this: if you used to fuck women, don't anymore (although you still find them hot and potentially would), but are only interested in serious relationships with men, isn't that sort of token bisexuality? Or token biromanticism or whatever the fuck you'd call it. Not really Yes. Your example stated "a man who hadn't had sex in a long time". That is an absence of all sexual activity. This is not, m…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 01:14 AM
2

http://www.reactiongifs.us/slow-clap-citizen-kane/
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:56 AM
0

That doesn't mean she's not bi, though. Ish. But a person who only has serious relationships with men is functionally hetero. didn't want to deal with any stigma of being in a homosexual relationship. Did you miss the part where I said she had had girlfriends before? Is a straight guy who hasn't had sex in a long time This is a false equivalence.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:55 AM
4

Although it should be said that fucking a gay woman is a totally wild experience. I'll save that story for another time.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:05 AM
10

For anecdotal evidence: Was recently dating a "bi" woman. She identified as bi, had had a girlfriend. She was 23. Her last homosexual experience was when she was 21. She made statements like "I'm more attracted to men than to women." Only "serious" relationships (moving in together, making life plans) were with men. That seems to be the common straight-girl trend in adolescence. Fuck some girls to "experiment", but when it comes time for a real relationship, go to the men. Men, especially younge…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:02 PM
27

Why do very few men take me seriously when I say I'm a lesbian? Probably because so many hetero women, especially in their 20s, have "experiences" with their female friends or go through a "bi phase" before settling down with men*. Women are more sexually fluid than men, and true lesbians - like yourself - are much rarer than women who have had homosexual experiences. *EDIT: changed "women" to "men" because straight women settle down w men, not women. Am dumb.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:40 PM
0

Yeah, you can't convince me, so might as well not try No, I don't care to. You're ideologically opposed, so anything I say would be a waste of effort. Not gonna bother with that. your rampant hatred of women I don't hate women, bub. I hate the way women are allowed to treat men. There is a difference. I'm sure The Red Pill's definitely gonna help pull all that weight to build men's shelters. They actually don't give a shit about those sorts of things. /r/TheRedPill, on the whole, accepts that me…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:46 AM
0

No convince me. No. any societal pressures women face are entirely their fault unless there's cold, hard, science behind it Funny. I've never seen that on the sidebar. the guy trying to sell me Oh, I ain't trying to sell you shit, friend. I could not care less what you believe or think. I just think you're annoying, and are speaking from a place of ignorance. Go on hating /r/TheRedPill if it makes you feel good. I've made my argument.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:39 AM
1

Oh boy. You are one determined troll. If anybody else could chime in here about being creep shamed, I would appreciate it. Clearly I am not going to convince this guy on my own.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:31 AM
2

Sigh like /r/socialskills No. /r/socialskills does not address the particularities of social interaction as they pertain to male and female power and social conventions, which is a huge contributing factor in things like "creep shaming" (which, coincidentally, is something we here in /r/mensrights care very much about). /r/malefashionadvice Maybe. /r/TheRedPill doesn't say much about wardrobe other than "dress well". any fitness sub, any diet sub. Ditto for these. "Lift, don't eat like shit." bu…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:28 AM
22

Yes. His sperm, his choice.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:53 AM
1

For all TRP's flaws Here, you missed this part
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:57 AM
2

And ValleyWag (GamerGate bullying)...and Deadspin...and Kotaku...all of them are SJW soapboxes. And are also terrible at journalism.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 09:07 PM
1

For all TRP's flaws, they absolutely say some great shit about social dynamics and about taking control of your own life.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 05:04 PM
2

So close to automatic that I'm comfortable using that term.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:37 PM
2

has more to do with alliance building Right on the nosie.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:29 PM
2

let's not pretend that custody to the mother is automatic LOL ...then you won't be financially destroyed No, just maimed. Winning? My argument is just to be selective. No, your argument is "look at this stacked deck. Pick the one card in it that does not offer an immediate shit outcome, but at any time can still generate the same shit outcome." make sure you marry someone who is trustworthy and financially responsible, in addition to the more alluring qualities like attractiveness and quality pe…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:28 PM
1

Ok, fair enough.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:29 AM
1

uneducated guys with no hope Right in the feels
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:58 PM
1

half the men here Perhaps, once you graduate, you should seek out non-'artistic' types in your social life. At least as a counterbalance to the set you'll be dealing with if you do indeed try to pursue art as a career.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 08:22 PM
1

when I treat men with anger issues...invariably that they are in great emotional pain and are actually suffering from clinical depression So a man can't be consistently angry without really being just depressed?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:34 AM
5

God your replies are always so good.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:32 AM
3

I seek out meaningful friendships with other men. If you think this sounds like a facile answer, mull it over. Men, even those who aren't MRAs, understand the bullshit we all deal with. Cultivating friendships with men is the #1 thing you can do to find people who understand.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 02:03 AM
1

"Was"
/r/MensRights15/03/15 01:51 AM
1

NP
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:58 PM
1

Oh, ok. Yeah I've never tended, was just applying as server.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:20 PM
1

Or, alternatively, push through crowds when the place is slammed and carry 6+ drinks in their massive hands. Seems like an argument can be made for both.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:32 PM
1

any male bar staff About a 1:3 male:female ratio. Notably, every male I saw on floor was 5'9" or shorter, no heavier than a buck fifty. while she could hire you for either job I get it. It's more that I'd make probably 1/3 as much working door as I would waiting tables.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 05:38 PM
1

God I hated our confirmation program. Three years of service projects and bible study and church four times a week and Luther's Small Catechism.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:23 AM
3

Apparently. "Fuck Chet. Let's run the train on Amy!"
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:03 AM
3

Grew up LCMS, they insisted that the only holidays were Christmas and Easter. And when I had to give my thesis in front of the congregation for confirmation, the pastor tried to blackball me because I suggested that Muslims and Jews might be right about God too.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:09 AM
13

in most ways that will count in the future How about when roads need to be paved? Or buildings built, or wars fought? Some airtight logic on this one.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:08 AM
2

What the hell did I just read?
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:05 AM
1

Technically pre marriage assets are not split. Only if they do not collect labor, and do not appreciate in value. (e.g., a house the man owned pre-marriage but improved post-marriage. Or, land which was owned prior to marriage, then developed post-marriage.) Half of post marriage assets acquired are lost immediately. Correct. She owned half of your post marriage shit anyway before you divorced. Also correct.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 01:15 AM
2

More like, men lose ~half their net worth in most divorces.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:24 PM
3

Well perhaps OP can hop in and clarify. FWIW, I'm going to assume he meant he's A-OK with not-short-term monogamy from a woman, but a lady who sleeps with lots of men, albeit one at a time, would bother him.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:28 PM
4

Correct. Judging by OP's criteria, he would be OK dating a woman who had had multiple monogamous relationships, but not a woman who had had a mix of monogamous relationships and one-night stands.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:11 PM
6

sexually active /= sexually promiscuous.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 04:39 PM
3

I would. It would give me great schadenfreude.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:26 AM
5

WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:35 PM
1

I figure it's the lack of having two X chromosomes. The 2nd normalizes the first. Meaning it makes it more average. It prevents x-recessive diseases, but also prevents retards and geniuses. That is actually correct.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 05:53 AM
7

120 IQ (about the level you need to go to college?) Considering that MENSA defines "genius" (AKA, "you're smart enough to be in our club") as beginning at 136, this is a ridiculously high standard. Somebody with a 120 IQ would, in theory, be in the top 5% of all people attending undergraduate studies in the United States. Your other claims about there simply being more male geniuses are correct. What the feminists are claiming is that there are fewer female geniuses because systemic oppression; …
/r/MensRights01/03/15 07:00 PM
11

Not too sure the respect part always stands up It sure doesn't, you cocksmoking bonerface.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 12:21 AM
3

"More male geniuses, also more male retards."
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:31 AM
2

Before Reddit I would confront casual sexism in the classroom, usually alone, and get painted as an asshole. Upon finding this place I realized the extent of many problems which I have been fortunate enough to avoid - e.g. paternity fraud, divorce rape, etc. It makes me very sad that so many brothers suffer like this, but I am very happy they have some place to go for counsel.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:30 AM
1

a bunch of sex maniacs I agree with that part. (More power to y'all.) The rest is very reactionary.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 05:05 AM
2

Seeing as we're talking about Camille Paglia and her conception of political ideology in the form of Gloria Steinem, no, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. But historical context is important in making our analogies.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:57 AM
1

It sounds like she's willing to bandy about adjectives and lay blame at gay men's feet, but it doesn't sound like she's any less willing to address the hypocrisy of tradcons. Still troubling, but idk if it's full-on male homophobia.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:55 AM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:54 AM
10

I kinda wish you were trawlin for some old lady ass.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:21 PM
9

I say this without irony: at least we have each other.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:19 PM
25

Would you tell us what state you live in, so that we can take action with the Department of Human Services and those who live in said state can call their congressmen and bitch?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 09:17 PM
4

The closest thing I'm finding is her saying male homosexuality is a response to the crisis of modern masculinity...got anything beyond that?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 04:20 AM
2

Battle of Britain, Pacific Theatre, North Africa, the North Atlantic, the Mediterranean, Sicily, Ultra intelligence, Italy doing some actual fighting All of those fronts were "actual fighting". fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 04:16 AM
2

it took until 1944 to do it It didn't. See: North Africa, Italy.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:38 AM
3

leaving it all to you Battle of Britain, Pacific Theatre, North Africa, the North Atlantic, the Mediterranean, Sicily, Ultra intelligence, Italy...none had even 1/10th the cost in human life that the Eastern Front did, but all those fronts were undertaken pre-D Day. Not to mention the supplies shipped via the North Atlantic to cities like Stalingrad and Moscow during 1941-43.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:37 AM
5

Stalin and Roosevelt got along just fine More like they tolerated each other to take down the Reich. Churchill admired him, apparently Churchill, for all his postwar lionization, was a warmongering dickhead who utilized repressive measures to maintain British control of the Raj during WWII and advocated chemical warfare. Like recognizes like.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:34 AM
5

anti-gay bigot Wasn't she a lesbian for like 30 years?
/r/MensRights26/02/15 03:33 AM
1

Me too. Whenever a woman is in the vicinity she absolutely loses her shit. I ignore her. Stupid cunt.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:31 PM
3

"Bro" is a gendered slur by this point, at least when used by the MSM and feminists. That's actually why I chose "twat". Also I call men "twat" all the time.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:10 PM
3

Twatwaffle.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:01 PM
1

Nope, took my handle from a book.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 04:37 AM
26

/u/5HourEnergyExtra, I just want to thank you for your activity, both in this linked thread and throughout the sub, in your comments spreading the message. You are consistently cogent and polite, and do an excellent job of debunking the "MRA Troll" stereotype.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:43 AM
2

/u/DulcineaWasAWhore doesn't seem to be around, so I'll swoop in with his old line: Chivalry is dogshit.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 07:04 PM
3

She sounds like a real catch, I think you should go for it.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 06:58 PM
5

Never giving those assholes money again.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:24 PM
2

Liberal arts were originally so termed because they were only taught to freemen, not slaves. Slaves were only taught topics pertaining to their job function.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 04:49 PM
1

CMON
/r/MensRights17/02/15 04:42 PM
0

Because vagina.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:25 AM
1

You're entire ability to reason rests on word replacement? No. It's an argumentative device, nowhere did I say it was the sum of my ability to argue. And you modded this place? What? I have never modded any subreddit. SJW minds like yours Explain how I'm a SJW. Go ahead, look through my post history. I'll wait. look like quite the moron you are Well if I am in fact a moron, it doesn't matter how I portray myself, because I'll still be a moron at the end. Care to try again? Kisses.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 02:49 AM
6

Women actually DO LIKE a guy 'lead' them I'm sure some do. Not that I'm required to give a shit. It's the breadth of your categorization that is unacceptable. not even close to an accurate analogy You do understand that we on this subreddit utilize that search and replace to point out that, were the speaker disparaging a more popularly-discriminated-against group, the statement would be blatantly prejudiced, correct? And that we use it all the time when refuting misandrist arguments? Judging by …
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:52 AM
2

bunch of emasculated whiny babies I see. Sensitivity to female suffering, and insensitivity to male suffering is wired into our DNA And women are hardwired to want to be pregnant. That doesn't mean that they "should" want to be pregnant. is an empty threat It's not a threat. It's a refusal to participate in a world which operates in an insane fashion. wright Right. Wright is a person who makes things. Playwright, Shipwright, etc. Most women don't have any idea what they want because they prefer …
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:01 AM
6

crazy libertarian "going galt" bullshit Some, not all. start acting a bit more masculine Careful there, telling men how they "should" act. If we all just started saying "No" to the collective cluster B personality disorder That's hunky dory to say "If". It won't happen, not on a broad scale. I personally try and be the change I want to see in the world That's magical. Have you been following Gandhi long? It's only the crazy few that are driving this bullshit. Why don't you take a look at the sys…
/r/MensRights16/02/15 02:46 AM
2

Jesus...talk to JAG ASAP.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 02:35 AM
2

Ok.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:59 AM
1

Oh I agree in principle. I just don't think enough men are willing to take that tack to reverse the tide.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:53 AM
17

Ehhh I think if you don't pay lip service to feminism most women will get bitchy. MGTOWs do manage to consistently get on their high horses, but I like their idea of living for themselves first.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:40 AM
1

If you're active duty military, go to JAG. Their job is to help you. Also, how did you manage to join when you'd been told you might be the father of a child? That is a standard screening question for male recruits, and is supposed to be grounds for fraudulent enlistment.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:37 AM
14

"You should be mutilated in accordance with my aesthetic preferences."
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:34 AM
–

"MEN NEED TO MAN UP AND ASK WOMEN OUT ON DATES"
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:33 AM
17

MGTOW BABY
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:33 AM
3

This makes me sad.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 09:05 PM
1

This is an unbelievably good response. Upvote
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:48 PM
2

always wonder why MRAs dont adopt patriarchal theory... upper class white male who has never been victimized by a female Just answered your own question. We don't adopt "patriarchy theory" because it is an ideological, poorly sourced, intellectually lazy argument which goes no further than acting as a boogeyman.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:47 PM
3

Read the sidebar.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:39 PM
2

What I meant was, UVA was the first "evil tool of the White Patriarchy" story that was discredited by a smoking gun, which means further stories of that nature will be subject to much more scrutiny.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:53 PM
6

I think in a legal sense, it's more the flood of Title IX lawsuits against schools by railroaded male students, as well as Sokolow's letter, that will change policy. In a "public perception" sense, though, UVA was huge, Sulkowicz not quite as huge but still important.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:54 PM
1

I don't think England will leave: they want to stay right where they're at, with the political privileges EU membership brings, without the Euro to fuck up their finances. You could always move to Dagestan. No way that could backfire!
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:47 AM
39

"Stop assuming that women will take advantage of men! Women don't do that! We are inherently noble!"
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:39 PM
1

Pakistanis and Arabs aren't emigrating to England in any great numbers You do understand I was talking about the large immigration of Pakistanis and Arabs to England post-WWII, which fueled the skinhead and "Keep England English" movements? (Although there was a 60 Minutes report last month on a white Anglo who rampages around London demonstrating against Salafists and wants to "keep England white", so it's still a part of politics, even if there isn't much parliamentary support for it.) I have …
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:29 PM
1

no right-wing nutjobs in the US? Didn't say that, don't think that. But since most Euro countries have parliamentary democracy, it's significantly easier for those on the political fringes (read: nutjobs) to get representation in the legislative body. a very left party won the recent elections Yes they did, and in order to get a significant enough majority to govern, they allied with the Greek far-right, which has been linked to nationalism and anti-Semitism. Care to try again?
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:17 PM
0

I find it funny (and also terrifying) that Europeans seem to react to every domestic crisis by forming far-right political parties with crazy ideologies. WWI happened? Fascism. Paks and Arabs immigrating to England? Skinheads. Feminists in Sweden? National Socialists. Financial meltdown in Greece? Fascism again.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 05:13 AM
3

The original Greek can also mean "lie". Hence why Herodotus was known as the "Father of History" or, alternatively, the "Father of Lies". Feminists often like to make broad social arguments based on faulty arguments - as here, they assume a linguistic genealogy based on nothing but sight.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 05:25 PM
2

You say "generally", but is it ever true that men have more domestic violence shelters to go to than women? LOL No.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:00 PM
1

Whoa...meta
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:30 PM
2

Feels so much better, ty
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:53 PM
41

"/u/IlleFacitFinem, you shouldn't believe this thing you believe, because you won't get any pussy." Classic shaming tactic.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:33 PM
7

STOP DLING TO SHITSITES. USE ARCHIVE.TODAY
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:31 PM
1

You bite your tongue.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 10:55 PM
6

I want a word for shrewish, bitchy solipsists like Valenti who indulge in "ironic misandry." Oh wait, that word already exists. It's "cunt."
/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:36 PM
7

It's sexual battery, and it is a crime.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:40 PM
2

You do realize that FGM is not always the cutting off of the clitoris, right? There are numerous varieties, including cutting of the labia - and may range in severity from relatively minor cutting to destroying vaginal sensation entirely, rendering the female genitals nothing more than a place from which to urinate, making sexual activity extremely painfuk.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:34 PM
3

"With her vagina, mouth, or anus, utilizing force or the threat of force, coercion, or incapacitating drugs." Same as for a man.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:31 PM
2

"Ay yo bitch get in the van" or "Ay bb want sum fuk" I have 18 children from 13 feminists.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:28 PM
2

I mean, I'd be pretty happy with that arrangement.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:07 PM
1

You're not.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:28 AM
2

This is a very astute distinction.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:37 AM
3

I hope you hit her really hard.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:48 AM
2

He should beat the fuck out of them for thinking they can attack him with impunity because of his gender. Of course, if he wants to avoid assumption of guilt on his part, he should endure the injustice, try to video record everything, and try to make sure they are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 02:47 AM
1

Ok condescending guy, explain it to me.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 07:36 PM
2

Oh bc deadbeat dads. Got it.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:15 AM
2

How does it do that?
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:15 AM
–

In addition to utilizing taxpayer dollars to do the work of issuing warrants and arresting him.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 07:11 PM
7

"If you were ten years younger I would just smother you with a pillow and do some good for the world. You're too big now, so I'll just have to live with my mistakes." WHAT THE FUCK?!
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:46 AM
2

Wish this applied in the U.S.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 09:24 PM
3

This reply is so badass.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 04:52 AM
6

Upvoting you so hard troll
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:34 PM
1

Now I have to downvote you.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 04:46 PM
1

I am all about getting free BC The fuck?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:31 AM
8

"Youuuuu cunting bitch." I like it.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:33 AM
0

Get new fucking friends.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:31 AM
2

What the fuck.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 02:31 AM
7

Cool. When academia, kangaroo courts, the NOW, and VAWA all think as you do, this post will be relevant. Until then, you're the exception, not the rule.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 05:55 PM
2

Equal rights equal fights
/r/MensRights05/01/15 05:16 PM
2

What kind of strong, empowered woman can't take criticism? What kind of strong, empowered woman has to have a yes-man at her side, agreeing with everything she says? The ones who write articles like this, and expect a pussy pass. How about just looking for an equal, someone who can be supportive but challenges you to think a little? They're not looking for that.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 04:05 AM
1

Whoever made this happen, thank you.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:46 PM
1

Zyclon B
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:44 PM
3

This belongs in /r/theredpill, not /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:35 PM
2

FINALLY SOMEBODY GETS IT
/r/MensRights03/01/15 09:54 PM
1

Really? Roosh?
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:27 PM
2

LOL @ DLing to ROK, you dummy. These guys are assholes and they make us look like assholes when you use their content.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:17 PM
2

The OP of the comment to which I replied asked what men's issues feminists helped with. I replied no, there aren't any, because I do not believe feminists give a shit about men's issues. Do you understand now?
/r/MensRights02/01/15 06:22 PM
-1

I'm trolling you, because you are dense and do not understand humor. Try to keep up.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:47 AM
0

Can you name any male issues that feminists are fighting for? No! BECAUSE THERE FUCKING AREN'T ANY! Hooked on Phonics didn't work for you.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:36 AM
-1

Well I think "foreplay" is a term that was invented with heterosexuals in mind, I don't think it really applies to the Sapphic arts.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:33 AM
0

Your humor detector needs work.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:19 AM
–

No! You know why?? BECAUSE THERE FUCKING AREN'T ANY!
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:47 AM
-1

Scissoring is the only true indicator of FF sex.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:46 AM
4

Cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:45 AM
3

This is wonderful.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 09:27 PM
1

Your ad hominems are showing, bro...
/r/MensRights31/12/14 04:53 AM
1

xenophobia, which is not hatred but ignorance Incorrect. Xenophobia, from the Greek for "foreign; alien" and "fear", means "fear of foreigners and foreign cultures." I don't care if you think Muslims are barbaric I don't. the only reason one might think it is is because they've never been here but assume those dirty sand niggers treat women like cattle WHOA with the racial slurs, tough guy. Secondly, you have switched from a merely moronic reply to an ad hominem, which addressed none of the evid…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 04:40 AM
1

MAYBE I DONT WANNA BE A GENTLE MAN
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:17 PM
1

Thank you for speaking sense, /u/blueoak9.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:17 PM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA WTF
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:16 PM
3

Ok, just correcting the misperception for the newbies.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:08 PM
0

Fuck off, dude. You're condescending.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:07 PM
6

rape-gang activities In Dearborn it's not rape. It's staring, growling, and groping. Dearborn is a surprisingly safe city Never said it wasn't. Dearborn is safe by conventional measures (murder rate per 100,000, for example). as people, it has not translated into a rape epidemic like one might assume. I don't assume that, nor do I think that. Don't put words in my mouth. But open antagonizing of women is very common there. Let's not give in to xenophobia at home because of crimes committed abroa…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:06 PM
0

That is what I disagree with. Cool. Doesn't make you right. Someone shouldn't settle for a shitty male therapist Who said the male therapist was shitty? because someone told them online that only men can empathize with men I am not a clinician, so I do not make clinical recommendations. I was expressing the opinion of a layman who has had experience with female therapists. I can empathize with anyone who shares with me because I care about the human experience. That's very obtuse. "I can underst…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:27 PM
18

Corrective note: Many MGTOWs engage in sexual intercourse with women. However, they choose prostitutes or, if a woman starts to bother them, they just peace. The notion of "never fucking any women" is a stereotype.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:16 PM
0

Why are you calling my words moronic Because I think that what you said is stupid. I don't understand why you are being so defensive Thinking you are wrong does not mean I am being defensive. does not mean that a trained therapist cannot This is correct. However, it is less likely, and as you are probably aware, therapy is not about the therapist. It is about the patient. If a patient feels, erroneously or otherwise, that a male (or female) therapist can help him better, then he should do so. th…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:13 PM
2

Hint: it has to do with the weather. People seek mates and comfort during the summer and during the holidays, and stop getting their panties in a twist about ideology.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:04 PM
5

Or just go to Dearborn, MI. I have a Palestinian-American friend who avoids visiting her parents because men try to paw at her in halal markets there.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:01 PM
0

There are thousands of therapists of both genders OK to assume that a woman can't empathize with a males experiences That is an particularly moronic statement. For example, I would have a hard time understanding the complexities of a young wife's relationship with her mother-in-law, because I am not female and women communicate differently than men do, especially intergenerationally. Likewise, a woman would (likely) have difficulty understanding why there is a subtext whenever I speak to my fath…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:57 PM
0

That's great, and I'm happy for them. In my experience, however, female therapists and counselors have difficulty in empathizing with many male types of experiences, and sometimes treat them as bad (e.g. "Your anger is bad.")
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:43 PM
0

Yes and no. I think female therapists have structural and experiential problems in empathizing with male experience, and vice versa. Don't even get me started on female couples' counselors.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:41 PM
1

I did not say that, nor do I believe it. What I did say is that you failed to acknowledge the man's point, and you are still failing to do so.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:40 PM
1

It is Carolina, after all.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:46 AM
1

Any video (say, of a man leaving his car with fists raised) would do.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:42 AM
2

A person who like handing out poisoned M&Ms.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:37 AM
1

/r/askmen is at least 50% female responders who claim to be "men".
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:34 AM
1

I hear women use it all the time.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:32 AM
1

If that's a boob compliment, then we agree.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:30 AM
4

The fact is that rape of women is absolutely wrong and there should be laws in place to stop it There are. Try being an alleged or convicted rapist in jail or prison sometime. And she's right. She's not. She's championing one gender at the expense of another, claiming that there is a significant disparity in rape based on sex. There isn't.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:27 AM
4

My brother is a psychologist, and his colleagues are ~90% female. GL opening your heart to somebody who shares zero of your gendered experiences fellas!
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:21 AM
1

You never addressed /u/pornography_saves_li 's point, which is that women enforce cultural norms and gender roles at least as much as men do.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:20 AM
2

/u/anonlymouse right now: http://giphy.com/gifs/deal-with-it-obama-9W4FM9Eis7Vyo
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:17 AM
1

FWIW I think the (historical) Black Panthers were fucking badasses.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:15 AM
1

Assuming justice was actually blind. It's not.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:00 AM
13

There's been heavy campaigning against, because of all the reasons you mentioned. It's a horribly bad idea. Probably won't make its way into law.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 01:59 AM
1

I think the judges addressed that with some BS. Really what it boils down to (when you strip away all the legalese) is, "The state would have to pay for these poor people if we didn't force you to do so, so guess what - shut up and pay."
/r/MensRights30/12/14 01:02 AM
3

We know that that's true, but these people are not logical. They are enslaved to an ideology, and the ideology dictates the truth. It's the new Politburo.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:43 PM
2

I was being generous.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:42 PM
1

I wouldn't fuck Anita or Jessica with a koala's dick.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:42 PM
6

"BUT THAT'S DIFFERENT"
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:42 PM
1

I know, I saw a picture of her this morning and thought "I was too kind"
/r/MensRights29/12/14 10:41 PM
15

Reminds me of the "Why We Objectify Men Without Guilt" article.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:00 AM
15

What a good phrase. You deserve more upvotes.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:31 AM
14

Bro they're both 7s at best.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:30 AM
16

For third-wave feminism, it means (among other things): Higher wages (the "wage gap" myth) Ability to serve in combat roles (we all know how deep that rabbit hole goes) Lower incidence of sexual assault (also bullshit) Greater physical strength (because fuck you for having testosterone, you make me feel scaaaaared with your muscles) Occupation of "high-powered" positions (e.g. Wall Street, Congress, Hollywood) Ability to not face questions re: family and work Ad nauseam.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:30 AM
12

I believe they utilize a cop-out similar to the following: "Women can be prejudiced against men, but they cannot be sexist against men, because they lack the institutional power."
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:27 AM
7

Correct. I was arguing rhetorically.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:26 AM
1

Shit, thank you.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:40 AM
1

Right, but those of us who would have our lives derailed by seeking treatment for depression (military, LEO, politics) can't really go that route.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:37 AM
2

How would water help a man dying of thirst?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:12 AM
5

We can't, because we don't have legal standing to challenge courts' rulings. As you said, with the common law principle of stare decisis, courts will be very reluctant to find against those rulings. Here are some of the rulings they have made: A boy who was* statutorily raped must pay child support for his rape baby [2014] A woman who "saved" a man's sperm from a blowjob was entitled to child support from him; as the court ruled "once [Joe Sadsack]'s sperm left his body, he did not own it anymor…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:11 AM
2

AVOID
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:05 AM
–

Jesus Christ. How is their arguing so infantile? "Hey, you just assaulted me." "Nuh uh! Assault is intent plus harm, and I'm not very strong. So it's not assault, it's just a punch that sorta hurt." Congratulations on the semantics, you are still a fucking asshole.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:04 AM
1

BIG FUCKING SURPRISE
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:28 AM
0

You should say whatever the fuck you want. If it bothers them, fine.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:22 PM
1

Fuck off idiot.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:17 PM
3

Hopefully Vasalgel solves all our problems. Until then, freeze some swimmers, get a vasectomy, and write your Congressman to demand reform in the jurisprudence of impregnation by deception.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 08:16 AM
1

Then take your post to /r/TheRedPill.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:25 AM
2

This. Cunt of an ex-GF peaced for that very reason.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 11:38 PM
5

Your current understanding is wrong.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 07:10 PM
7

The foreskin is analogous to the female clitoris - it contains many thousands of nerve endings, without which the level of sexual pleasure in men is decreased. Also, the glans (head) of the penis is mucosal skin, meaning it is not meant to be walking around uncovered. This is why most mutilated men have significant scar tissue on the glans, and also why many men who opt to reverse their circumcision experience a "shedding" of that scar tissue.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 05:07 AM
42

When they try to shame us using the word "creepy", we know we're doing something right.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 10:07 PM
4

EJECT EJECT
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:08 PM
-1

LOL
/r/MensRights22/12/14 03:25 AM
0

HAHAHAHAHAH OK moron.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 03:04 AM
1

No, they don't, because any contract that can be "proven" as having been signed under duress is invalid. (Guess what the first thing an embittered soon-to-be-divorcee's lawyer is going to try to prove is?) If coercion can be "proven" (although the evidentiary standard for said proof is not up to a jury), the judge can throw out the prenup when making his ruling. Prenups can't help you. Don't get married.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:54 AM
0

That doesn't make a goddamn bit of difference, because people do lie. And those lies often compel judges to throw out pre-nups prior to making divorce rulings. I repeat: disinformation. Stop spreading it.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:52 AM
0

No. Getting laid is a welcome side effect. (TRP is a heteronormative ideology, which will become relevant in a moment.) TRP advocates taking control back in life so one can be a better man; a man interacts with and has fruitful interactions with women, part of which is sexual encounters. Check the sidebar. It's as much about ridding oneself of shitty vices (caffeine, bad food, indolence, dead-end jobs) and embracing more meaningful alternatives as it is about finding ways to slay pussy.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 07:51 PM
-1

Pre-nups aren't worth the paper they're written on. Stop spreading disinformation.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 07:05 PM
0

I hate Ann Coulter, but this is kind of funny.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 07:02 PM
1

It's not. Getting laid is a side effect of swallowing the Pill. TRP is about taking the control back in your life - money, job, social interaction, happiness.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 07:01 PM
1

TRP "denizens", as you call them, need good male role models and friends, because that is what men have been denied their entire childhoods. If you'd read their sidebar you'd understand that TRP isn't about hating women, at all; it's about understanding (among other things) that men have been lied to about male:female interaction (a point with which we in this sub can probably agree). Much of the "hatred" of TRPers toward women is actually part of what they call the "anger phase" (they follow th…
/r/MensRights19/12/14 06:59 PM
2

Another person telling men how to be men. Surprise!
/r/MensRights15/12/14 05:15 AM
9

wut
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:21 AM
66

So THAT's why they do that weird thing in porn where they make the girl show she swallowed...
/r/MensRights11/12/14 09:44 PM
-2

HAHAHAHAHA OK. Even if some of their articles are good, they are liberal fascists. Disagree with them and you're the scum of the Earth.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 10:18 PM
1

Alternet and Salon that utterly discredit themselves keeping her on staff. LOL, they discredit themselves by being smarmy tabloids. Marcotte is just the icing on the cake.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:54 PM
1

She cray.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:53 PM
2

many women who would make the grade. At the easier pull up test? At the slower run time standard? At carrying a 200# man in 50-80# of kit when he gets hit? Shut the fuck up, nobody cares what kids you have. Women on front lines, in combat positions, especially when integrated with men, would be a fucking disaster and would get people killed. Civilian notions of equality and fairness do not fucking matter in the military.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:25 PM
3

You mean they'll fight alongside us and get us fucking killed?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:48 AM
1

-25, you're not even a good nerd.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 11:35 PM
2

Oooo...touche.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 09:26 PM
0

Are you mad because your mom cancelled your WoW subscription?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 09:25 PM
1

Despite making a good response in the above post, you should dry your tears, crybaby.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:19 PM
2

Good talk.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:51 PM
6

You know what's going to happen to them...NOTHING.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:29 PM
2

Dude, good work.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:29 PM
7

She's actually had a decent career, which is now torpedoed. She'll end up writing for the Podunk Globe and Mail if she's lucky.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:28 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6WHBO_Qc-Q
/r/MensRights05/12/14 07:24 PM
3

Nothing.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 05:40 PM
2

You went full retard.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 05:39 PM
1

Fucking Swedes
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:06 PM
1

You can expect some bullshit training that won't change anything. Welcome to the US military.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:03 AM
1

ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME
/r/MensRights01/12/14 02:58 AM
2

Dammit OP, that picture turned me right the fuck on.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 02:02 AM
1

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lupxmqcvCJ1qz4vjio1_500.png
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:57 AM
1

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:13 AM
1

Not taking shit from anybody. Standing up for what's right. Trying to make the world better.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:13 AM
–

Piers Morgan is an asshole. No news there.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:11 AM
1

0/10 you lack potential as a troll
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:43 PM
3

We don't use TRP as a symbol. Are you aware that exchange rate for unicorns to leprechauns has been suffering in the past few weeks? The "original point" of feminism had very little to do with equality - unless, of course, you strip away all the racist and classist notions of first-wave feminism. Did old-timey feminists want poors to vote? Nope. Did they want blacks to vote? Nope. That's like saying "the original point of the American Revolution was franchise" even though universal male suffrage…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:41 PM
1

I guess my question would be, why is this something we need to discuss? You make a solid point in mentioning that the foils in those commercials (Super Creepy, Super Shy, Super Hairy, Super Skinny) would never be attempted with a female star, because they would be viewed as insensitive. (Side note: apparently people with shy bladders were up in arms about the Super Shy one.) That having been said, while these commercials are an expression of the "Men=Strong" trope, I think there are much more pe…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 08:46 PM
1

Test prep teacher here: every elite-scoring SAT Math (700+) student I've had has been male. Side point: boys do better than girls on standardized tests, period, especially SAT and ACT. Simply because they're more likely to pick answers more decisively.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 07:06 PM
2

You need more upvotes.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 07:00 PM
5

Mountains out of molehills, bro.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 06:56 PM
2

You, my friend, are very funny.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 05:52 AM
19

They didn't destroy it, they invented Marriage 2.0. Which is a fucking disaster.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:40 PM
2

This is a good point.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:36 PM
2

Dude...that was awesome.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:51 AM
-1

Agitate for change, but don't revel in other people's misfortune The definition of "telling me how to act". He can "call me out on it" all he likes, and that's fine; but I don't have to do what some idiot tells me to do.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:14 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:33 AM
–

Go fuck yourself. I'll react how I like.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 02:31 AM
7

Then allow me to obnoxiously gloat on behalf of the millions of men who have suffered the same fate, but nobody gave a shit because they weren't rich female celebrities.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:37 AM
–

SHOE'S ON THE OTHER FOOT BITCH
/r/MensRights25/11/14 11:16 PM
2

Even a broken clock is right twice a day
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:25 AM
1

So charge at the time, and reopen the case if or when new evidence becomes available. Don't change our entire history of jurisprudence.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:24 PM
6

Innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:22 PM
8

I would argue that even more importantly than having sway over legal proceedings, they have honed the rage-jerk into a well-oiled machine via the Internet. You can produce anger so much quicker than you could back in '92.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:21 PM
1

I'm mostly angry at myself for reading it.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:13 PM
18

What a coincidence, I don't care how women feel when I objectify them. We're cool, right?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 09:18 PM
5

Jesus fuck what a stupid article.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 09:15 PM
2

FIGHT THE POWER
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:52 AM
2

You always beat me to the punch bro.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:12 AM
2

Downvoted.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:01 AM
1

Fuck off, crybaby
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:56 AM
6

"Not to mention, I've recently taught GF how to be barefoot and pregnant. Progress all around!" Satire might do the trick here better than taking a principled stand, with a lower likelihood of offending family.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:51 AM
1

OK.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 05:55 PM
2

In other news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:41 AM
3

Allow me to clarify my position: 3rd wave contemporary American feminism is largely concerned with non-issues, demonizing men and maleness, and promoting two standards for judging each gender, while simultaneously demanding "equality" (which they never get around to defining).
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:39 AM
1

Sure, she's extended an olive branch. Good on her. But her logic is still shit.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:37 AM
3

That since women often have fewer formal rights than men in third-world and repressive countries, they objectively have it "worse". She's quantifying human suffering. Is it terrible that those girls were kidnapped by Boko Haram while trying to go to school, sold off into slave-marriages, and likely raped repeatedly? Yes. Do they objectively "have it worse" (author's language) than the young boys Boko Haram murdered, set on fire, and crucified? No. She doesn't know that - she jumps to that conclu…
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:34 AM
3

They're awesome. They give men a space to be men around other men. If there are female-only spaces, there have to also be male-only spaces.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:06 PM
6

This article is stupid, and claims that feminism and the MRM are two sides of the same coin. It also claims that, worldwide, women are more oppressed than men (which is at the least a logical fallacy).
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:19 PM
2

She jumpin bad
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:03 AM
2

It's en masse. And no.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:27 PM
1

To clarify: the term "toxic" is a bogeyman. Feminists use the TM term to refer to "masculinity" (as though there were one, monolithic figure that could even be addressed) as a base state - that the way we raise boys into men is inherently harmful, makes them unhappy and unhealthy, hate women, etc. They also utilize the term in such a way as to suggest that it is both structural and endemic to society, which means it is self-perpetuating. I believe there are some bad things about the way our cult…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:49 PM
1

It's from Fight Club, buddy. I just said it because you mentioned nihilism. Rest easy.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:22 AM
1

You wanted to destroy something beautiful.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:55 AM
1

It's certainly possible, but I prefer to utilize the term as a riposte against the way "toxic masculinity" is bandied about in feminist discourse, second only to "rape culture".
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:04 AM
1

For fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:01 PM
2

Me. Lots.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:05 PM
2

STFU VALENTI
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:02 PM
3

You're forgetting that in a successful paternity suit, the state gets a slice of that sweet sweet child support payment. They more than make back their expenses.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:52 PM
-7

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:47 PM
4

I don't always feel like men should be able to opt out of having responsibility for a child they helped create But women can always opt out of responsibility for a child they helped create, assuming they can reach an abortion clinic in the first two trimesters. You're a sexist. Congratulations.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:46 PM
0

Demonspawn, I think I love you.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:44 PM
1

Sexism.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 02:41 PM
6

Don't DL to Huffington Shitpost.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:52 PM
2

Oh for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:46 PM
3

Uh-huh. So what do the feminists define as "toxic femininity"? Oh wait, they don't say shit.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:42 PM
2

"Toxic masculinity" is actually just "male actions we don't like".
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:41 PM
8

Congratulations, brother. Spend the money on something you care about.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:40 PM
1

I'm not hostile. I just think you're making a shitty argument. It's not bad to look up to role models from "other media" (video games, books, films), but not sufficient on its own, because those people are fake. Boys need real people in their lives, not (just) fictional characters or reportage of real-world heroes. A man mustn't fix motors or paint houses to prove he is a man. Writing is as valid a masculine pursuit as ironwork. That having been said, I don't care about your novel, dude. I don't…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:34 PM
1

For fuck's sake. Women communicate differently than men do - I hope we can agree on that basic premise. It follows that a child raised primarily by women will learn to communicate in a primarily female way - which makes it more difficult, as an adult, to communicate with other men. As you said, your own history is anecdotal. Regarding bullet point 2: you do realize those were two examples, chosen from a possible pool of thousands, correct? Also, as you state, a man is defined by "what he has don…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:19 PM
15

It's an extension of the grading disparity seen in primary and secondary education - girls are routinely given higher grades, punished less, etc. than boys, hence the educational achievement disparity. Same thing happens with traffic violations.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:39 PM
1

Or they could show the far more common scenario, where his guilt turns inward and he suicides. FFS. People need to stop co-opting men's suffering.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:36 PM
2

No, I don't think it's primitive. Men raised solely by women tend to have extreme difficulty socializing with groups comprised of other men, which leads to loneliness, stagnation, and ultimately suicide (as you're likely aware, suicide is one of the foundational issues of the MRM). I did not call you a man-child. I think the definition of "man-child" is someone who is incapable of taking care of himself - inability to make money, pay the bills, make rent, etc. That having been said, video game r…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:51 PM
1

That doesn't mean that all boys have had that experience, or that video game role models are "enough". Boys need to learn from grown men how to become men. We live in a society that neuters them from the age of 5.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:26 PM
-1

Or, more boys will grow into man-children without positive male role models. The second supposition concerns me more.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:43 PM
2

My feelings are that affirmative sexual activity is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:08 AM
6

Stop direct linking to Huffington Shitpost.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:54 PM
1

Our brave soldiers, sailors, and Marines placed in even more danger than they would be otherwise because standards enacted that will let less fit personnel into roles to suit a political agenda. Onward, political correctness! Onward, McCaskill and Feinstein! Take care to wash the blood from your hands as you ascend the rostrum.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:41 AM
2

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:39 AM
1

I didn't report for that very reason. She said, and I quote, "Go ahead. You know who the cops will believe anyway."
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:38 AM
0

That doesn't address the specifics of the above thread. 2XC drew from the posted video that "those people" (read: black people from the ghetto) are the primary perpetrators of "catcalling" (scare-quoted here because much of what that woman experienced was not cat-calling). Then you back up their conclusion, because reasons. I repeat, confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:34 PM
1

OHHHHHH I SEE
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:45 PM
-1

No, the prosecution has to prove that you had the mens rea and intended to fuck someone against his will. That's what innocent until proven guilty means.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:44 PM
1

No doubt. The important note here is that, rape being a criminal offense, the higher standard (mens rea) is the one utilized in deciding guilt. That doesn't affect the dangerous "affirmative consent" culture, I agree. I've never found those definitions in textbooks, only in theoretical works, especially those by MacKinnon. Most of the textbooks have PIV sex as acceptably consensual.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:43 PM
1

Sure? What I meant was, rape is a crime which involves intent (mens rea, or "guilty mind"), which precludes the notion of "accidental" rape.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 12:12 AM
1

So based on one piece of evidence, you have concluded that "a majority of harassment" is perpetrated by black men. Sounds very scientific, and not at all like confirmation bias. Moron.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:30 PM
3

So MIT is supposed to be full of smart kids. Do they not understand the concept of mens rea?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:28 PM
2

Technically that's negligent homicide, although depending on the DA they could trump it up to manslaughter.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:27 PM
1

Manslaughter is murder without malice aforethought. Basically you didn't go into the situation planning to kill the person.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:26 PM
-1

You're a fucktard.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 04:52 PM
1

I could be wrong. I just recall her calling attention to the story long after everybody was trying to forget they'd ever reported on it, in particularly shrill fashion.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 12:35 PM
1

I think her shrieking about the Duke (fake) rape case even after Crystal Mangum's claims were proven false, while all the major news outlets were trying to sweep their idiocy under the rug, probably did her some damage. Ditto her basically telling women to be blowjob machines throughout their early 20s. It's a pity Slate is so stupid when it comes to issues of gender, because I found some of their articles to be quite intelligent. Not gonna give them ad revenue. (She also sacrifices babes during…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 09:21 PM
1

Yes, and it's called feminism.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:45 PM
7

Amanda Marcotte, fuck off and never be allowed to write another word.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:44 PM
2

To clarify: you can be born with nice big titties. You cannot be born with a mutilated penis.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:45 PM
2

Because it's an acculturated practice that's been commonplace in the States since the beginning of the 20th century. Nobody wants to think that they had a crime committed on them, or that they have committed a crime on their children.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:41 PM
1

All when ethnically, both Middle Eastern Muslims and Jews are technically "semitic." Nope. Not unless you trace the lineage back ~2000 years. Also, utilizing that argument to claim that there's no functional difference between Muslims and Jews is like claiming there's no difference between Japanese and Han Chinese. (Hint: there is.) And you're sitting there saying "how dare Middle Eastern countries hate the obviously aggressive and expansionist country whose existence is founded upon killing us …
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:26 PM
2

Except one is genetic, and the other is a result of a surgical mutilation. American women, especially white women, often have a visceral reaction to whole men.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:12 PM
1

Tell that to girls who say "uncut penises are GROSS." (There are lots of them.)
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:30 AM
1

This.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:29 AM
2

NO YOU NEED TO GIVE US THINGS AND BACK RUBS
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:29 AM
4

Because when they commit a crime, they're voluntarily acting upon another person or person's property. When you're raped, you're not the one acting; you're the one acted upon.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:22 AM
3

How not to debate a feminist: by talking to one in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:51 AM
7

Actually, this is true: on average male porn performers earn significantly less than female.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:49 AM
1

Everybody abaord the Co-Op Train! CHOO CHOO
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:44 AM
1

Personally, it pisses me off. I wear tank tops because they're comfortable when they're hot out. But I'm the one putting my body out there, so I accept that people will look.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 08:23 PM
1

Women are allowed in the military. No feminist wants women to be subject to the draft. (The last push by a major feminist organization was in the 1970s, by NOW. Nothing since.) Wage gap=myth, when controlled for work variables (choice of profession, hours worked, time taken off from work).
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:41 PM
3

Every time I hear a feminist rant that includes the words "[vague threat of possible violence] from somebody who is three times as strong as you" I lose it. Just fuck off, you dumb slag.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:31 PM
2

When I wear tank tops, there is much ogling.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:25 PM
3

I'm gonna say it before /u/DulcineaIsAWhore gets here: Chivalry is dogshit.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 01:22 PM
1

Uh huh.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:43 AM
2

It is certainly the nuclear option.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:16 AM
2

Maybe. It's super disheartening to run through the thousands of women who think that way, though.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:06 AM
3

I'm calling bullshit on that one.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:56 AM
2

What I meant was, when I'm out with a woman and it's going well, and then I insist she pay for her own shit, suddenly she's very unpleasant.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:28 AM
0

Resting Bitch Face.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:15 AM
0

Recently back out on the market and it SUUUUUUUCKS. Once the refusal to pay occurs, the RBF comes on.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 03:55 AM
18

I know they're ideologically driven, but I'm surprised somebody in marketing didn't say, "Guys, this is going to backfire."
/r/MensRights22/10/14 11:01 PM
13

All those companies have pulled ads already?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 11:00 PM
2

"Cracked staff" AKA Soren and Wong.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:50 PM
1

Yep. There's no magic bullet.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:48 PM
3

4 women are hardly a majority. I have yet to receive a positive reaction when I mention men's rights issues to a woman.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:47 PM
0

Sexual assault includes everything except penetration of naughty bits. E.g. grabbing boobs is sexual assault. A woman forcing a man to penetrate her is rape.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:45 PM
49

So granted, Gawker are morons. But how in the blue fuck did they have a meeting where they decided "You know that whole 'gamers' thing? It will go over well if we try to publicly shame them." Who the hell thought that would work?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:44 PM
2

Um...shit.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:22 AM
3

Thoughts: she's a dumbass.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:19 AM
2

My bad on the BAS. I've been out of the loop for while. Right, because the only differentiation in the pay chart is "With dependents" (which includes spouse) and "without dependents", right?
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:57 PM
2

It's me saying that it is significantly more difficult for a man to force a woman to have a child, and then to leech court-mandated social benefits (like child support) off her, than the other way around. A man could poke holes in condoms, or sabotage birth control; but a woman could still get an abortion. Conversely, if a woman "accidentally" gets pregnant there's nothing the man can do to stop her from carrying that fetus to term. The dependency system that the federal government (and therefor…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:43 PM
23

"In Which I Explain Why Double Standards Are Okay".
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:32 PM
2

Stop direct linking to these sites. You are giving them ad revenue. Use donotlink.com.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:27 PM
1

You're fucking kidding, right? Institutional anti-Semitism is part and parcel of Middle Eastern Muslim countries. I used Iran and Saudi Arabia because they were the best and easiest examples, but here are some more: Iraq Turkey Syria Lebanon Yemen Oman Egypt UAE Qatar Palestine (complicated, since it's not a country) I could go on, but you get the idea. And while Indonesia is the largest Muslim country by population, if you add up the populations of said example countries you get at least as man…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 06:36 PM
1

Yes, it is primarily young men. Men 18-24 make up around 53% of the enlisted ranks, so there are way more of them to take advantage of. Of course it makes it easier to have a spouse. That having been said, military wives are notorious for fucking around with Jodie while husband is away for good reason. It's not perfect, no doubt about that. Especially given the way single servicemembers consistently get the shit duties because "they don't have anywhere to be". Although I fully support some of th…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:45 PM
1

It's actually uniform across the branches, but yes, I miswrote that. I believe subsistence allowance increases for each dependent, but base salary is just classified as "without dependents" or "with dependents".
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:20 PM
3

And men and boys are still abused and murdered by mothers, wives, family members, and babysitters...as well as controlled domestically by women determined to control or punish them. Jesus, this lady needs to learn how to argue. Because female control and punishment is sometimes less physical, in her mind it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:43 PM
2

The dipping, man...OH GOD ALL THE DIPPING.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:45 PM
3

We're on the same wavelength, brother. When people ask me to explain these sorts of things I often fall back on saying, "I many ways, military culture is stuck in the 1950s". They encourage certain things - family, heterosexuality (sodomy still being a criminal offense under the UCMJ), an automobile, relative acceptance of tobacco compared to the civilian world. Also it's popular for strippers, but even moreso for women in foreign countries where there are U.S. military bases looking to escape a…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:27 PM
17

Of course bad people come both male and female. However, as the U.S. military is overwhelmingly male (about 86%), and only women can get pregnant, the Dependopotamus Gambit is a tactic overwhelmingly perpetrated on young enlisted men, by women.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:24 PM
23

Let's be clear: the young enlisted are seeking the vagina, not the kids and the CS payments. But yes, when you have basic training, during which time you are NOT getting laid, which can last from 8 to 13 weeks, and then you're in A (and sometimes B) school, and you're only 18-20, you're gonna go looking for "trouble" (women looking to get a kid on a military men). Yes, you get paid more via increases in your Basic Housing Allowance (assuming you are off-base, and not in base housing, which is us…
/r/MensRights21/10/14 12:13 PM
1

I can't find the source, but a FTM transman once attested to how physically-based his desire became as he pursued his transition.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:58 AM
1

Shit is fucked up.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:51 AM
3

Did anybody notice how fucking ridiculously murky the feminist notion of "consent" is in this article? The ideology notwithstanding, they're venturing into a legal minefield. I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:50 AM
–

Young enlisted beware. It's an actual side industry of dependopotamuses.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 11:47 AM
1

Right on. Glad you have a plan.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 03:21 AM
1

Well, 1) there are plenty of ways to get fucked over in a divorce other than children. But good on you for taking the wild card out of the deck. 2) I guess what you have to ask yourself is, do I see this getting worse? E.g. will my girlfriend continue to become more and more radical? If so, despite your obvious love for her, you've gotta get the hell outta Dodge. If she's a feminist now, she'll probably only be more feminist in the future - and as you said, she's very vocal about her "views".
/r/MensRights21/10/14 03:09 AM
1

Don't get married, to anybody. Marriage is a shit deal for men. It's time to jump ship.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:51 AM
4

My thoughts: either expect to be treated like a goddamn equal or a wilting beauty, not both.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:42 AM
1

Not to mention, the "extreme" feminists tend to wield enormous institutional power (especially in academia).
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:36 AM
1

Downvotes for having a feminist girlfriend and not questioning her rhetoric.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:35 AM
1

Actually, belief in an international Zionist conspiracy is exceedingly common among most Muslim countries. If you recall, when Ahmadinejad was still president the PRI hosted an academic convention which, among other things, endorsed Holocaust denial. Likewise for countries like Saudi Arabia. The Protocols is actually used there as evidence of Zionism, not an example of anti-Semitism. TL;DR Feminism has indeed trivialized sexism against men, but your counterexample is factually inaccurate.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:33 AM
6

"But that's just Jezebel! We're not ALLLL like that!" "Are you familiar with Scotsmen?"
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:29 AM
1

Ever noticed how it really pisses feminists off when you make value judgments about their preferred sexual activities, yet they're perfectly okay claiming that men hate or mistrust women for having particular sexual kinks?
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:43 AM
3

Show me the statistic that says "a very significant proportion of men are in favor of [MGM", because that sounds like absolute bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 09:21 PM
2

WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK
/r/MensRights17/10/14 10:57 PM
6

Wishful thinking. They're young and impressionable. This law will let the feminists indoctrinate them early.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 02:42 AM
1

I know they do it. It's just such blatant bullshit. "Wrong for thee, not for me"
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:21 AM
2

My favorite comment (regarding inquiring after someone's sexual history to be a "violation of privacy"): as a violation of privacy or intimate confidence, but much less wrong than a man doing the same thing So it's wrong for a woman, but MORE WRONG for a man. ...Are you fucking kidding?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:10 AM
-5

JUSTICE!
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:44 AM
3

How does this relate to men's rights?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:07 AM
1

I wouldn't know if every single person ever has done that. And yes, I do think it is wrong to do so.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:46 AM
2

Except it's not for the sake of conversation. The ulterior motive behind the conversation is getting in good enough that she'll fuck you later. TL;DR Yes it is.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:27 AM
2

"He who give up his integrity for a taste of the pussy deserves neither pussy nor integrity." - Benjamin Franklin
/r/MensRights14/10/14 04:19 AM
2

You sound like a real charmer.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:13 AM
0

No.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:04 AM
3

Fight the power
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:09 AM
1

Yes, as many of them share the same methodology and are missing the same controls (e.g., controlling for other methods of HIV transmission). I'm saying that the CDC, an American institution, has an agenda (read: pediatric surgeons lobby) and selects the "research" to fit that agenda. Ask yourself why the U.S. is the only country that mutilates the majority of its infant boys. It's not done in Europe, and rates of HIV transmission (via sexual intercourse at least) are no higher there than here. I…
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:34 AM
1

Thank you for this.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:52 PM
3

The only issue I have is an issue with dumbasses who perpetuate the myth that chopping off part of your dick can save the world. Please, go away from the sub.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 10:30 AM
2

Check the methodology of the studies done that "prove" MGM reduces rates of HIV transmission. The methodology and sample size of the one study that the CDC uses are both laughable.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 10:28 AM
3

The crotchety old dude who thinks things are fucked up because they aren't like they were back in his day is so cliched, but this is where I'm at with all the feminist legislation. Every day it's some new sexist bullshit. To paraphrase Hubert Farnsworth, "I don't want to live on this planet anymore."
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:31 AM
2

I sometimes think the tinfoilers screaming "THIS IS THE FEMINIST ENDGAME" are overblowing it, but this really does scare the shit out of me.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:21 AM
3

So seriously...at what point does this become a law people try to introduce for everybody, not just colleges?
/r/MensRights11/10/14 07:34 AM
0

Had I the funds I would gild you, friend.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 07:32 AM
3

So you ask me for evidence to prove my point, and when I do so, tell me that the evidence doesn't matter and MGM is still a good idea...thank you for confirming my hypothesis about you being a moron. And you took a side when you told the sub that mutilating baby boys conferred benefits (which, as some of the reading I provided you and which you ignored proved, is not the case). For fuck's sake, were you unaware that MGM is one of this sub's primary issues? Read the sidebar. FWIW, I think checkin…
/r/MensRights11/10/14 06:55 AM
0

http://www.intactamerica.org/learnmore http://www.thewholenetwork.org/twn-news/does-circumcision-cause-erectile-dysfunction (about a thousand relevant links on that page) Now quit spreading misinformation, dumbass. And start finding your own information. And quit contributing to the mutilation of baby boys through your ignorance.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 03:27 AM
2

No there aren't, dumbfuck. There are significant health detriments to circumcision, especially as the man ages (ED).
/r/MensRights11/10/14 12:12 AM
1

Then why are you linking to it?
/r/MensRights11/10/14 12:08 AM
3

Don't tell that to Huffington Post...
/r/MensRights08/10/14 08:30 PM
4

We're animals, didn't you know? Just disgusting pigs...except pigs are intelligent, caring animals.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 08:27 PM
2

I had a girlfriend for three years, then when she broke up with me and I went on a few dates with a woman, she literally used the word "companionship" when explaining why I should be hers exclusively. I thought it was just a joke that women use that word to justify being shitty relationship material. Alas, alas.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 08:25 PM
27

This. When contemporary women complain that "men are too picky", they often mean something along the lines of "he'll fuck me, but won't commit to a dedicated relationship". Spin mastery.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 11:17 AM
3

We think this comic sucks, per the link TRPACC provided. It's actually been posted here a few times, with the same negative reaction.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 12:48 AM
1

God fucking dammit I'm ashamed of my alma mater.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 08:12 AM
1

Sometimes you just gotta deal with it...
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:15 AM
1

I guess if it's of your own free will, sure. But neither FGM nor MGM usually are.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:14 AM
2

Sign me up.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:08 AM
3

Because God forbid there's skin around the tip of your dick. The equivalent would be shearing off the labia because men find it more aesthetically pleasing...which would be goddamn awful.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:07 AM
1

Children, eh? God forbid little Timmy isn't taken seriously during his lunchtime meeting to swap a sandwich for a 3-pack of Oreos.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:06 AM
1

I believe he stated that a man called to be a juror in a rape trial should never, under any circumstances, make his vote for "guilty" due to the difficulties faced by alleged rapists in the legal system. For one.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:05 AM
2

Also, take note of the way she insults the size of one's member in order to shame him into doing what she wants (taking up less space).
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:28 AM
6

He says some stupid and extreme shit, but this gives me hope.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:25 AM
1

I'm guessing he's trying to address how men are expected to dress certain ways to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:23 AM
2

The way homosocial (as opposed to homosexual) touch is stigmatized by both genders drives me up the wall. You make a good point.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:44 AM
1

No documentation, but I can nerd out on it etymologically. The root word of "chivalry" is the Old French "cheval", meaning "horse". Chivalry was the code governing the rules of horse-mounted combat, which extended to knights as the High Middle Ages began. With this came troubadours and the construction of "courtly love", the way knights were supposed to treat damsels (which, as we all know, was often far from the truth - check Crusades for evidence). Hence chivalry no longer just meant how you c…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:44 AM
3

God, in 2010 they were so funny with all the dick jokes. RIP, OG Cracked. Ye shall be missed.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:35 AM
1

She's just the worst. Also, don't link to these websites.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:59 AM
2

DTMFA
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:43 AM
11

Guess what: if women don't want men to tell them how to be women (they don't, and we shouldn't), women don't get input on how to be a man.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:38 AM
9

So I listened to this...a female participant in the course stated that she could open the door for herself, but that "if a man offered to pay, [she] wouldn't say no." Welcome to equality, gentlemen.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:37 AM
11

No.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:14 AM
1

Women branding men "a good guy" (or in your case, "a nice guy") is absolutely a qualification tactic. Your girlfriend's mom, who confided to her daughter you're a "Good Guy"? She's decided you're Good Enough for her daughter. It drives me up the wall. I wouldn't tell my brother his wife was a Good Girl, so don't presume to know what makes a good man.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:12 AM
1

We're trying to take it back across the pond. No dice thus far.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:05 AM
2

Forming an argument around an ideology, that's what they're good at.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:04 AM
2

Nordom?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:02 AM
1

Stratum
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:01 AM
2

They don't have any responsibility for anything, because...teh Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:55 AM
7

Let's write an article called "Women have no ovaries" and see how long it takes to be Internet-brigaded.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:51 AM
1

Cry foul* Cry fowl would be me yelling "CHICKEN!"
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:45 AM
1

I wouldn't think too much about it. Linking what people are into sexually to their political/personal stances is tendentious at best. If it's consensual and safe for both parties, NBD.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:34 AM
1

What a bitch.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:35 PM
0

Man, I liked this guy too.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:32 PM
6

"Endurance" (itself a nebulous term) doesn't fucking matter if you can't hump your goddamn gear. In case you are not an infantryman, they hump ~100 lbs. of gear while on exercises or fighting. Further examples: Buddy pinned by a collapsing wall, or felled by a grenade? Guess what cockbag, it's your job to drag him (in full kit) and fireman carry him to an exfil point. That load could range anywhere from 200-300 lbs. Need to pull yourself over a wall (again in full kit)? Never fear! Thanks to the…
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:15 AM
-1

B-B-but...MUHSOJUHNEEEE Equal opportunities...unequal strength tests. Equal opportunities...UTIs and consequent medevacs. Equal opportunities...destruction of unit camaraderie. Equal opportunities...inability to run and fight in full kit. This is going to get people killed. Not just in Marine infantry; in SPECWAR also.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:55 PM
1

How is this not going to be railroaded under Title IX?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:52 AM
1

Yes, and while we're at it, let's ban drinking and talking in bars. Or you could fuck off.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:51 AM
14

It's telling that I posted this to FB...and absolutely no one responded. Nobody gave a shit.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:49 AM
1

I'm not saying it's good science. I'm saying it's a phenomenon so ubiquitous as to be an established fact. Women love tall men. And they loathe (or sometimes pity) short men. That's just how it is. Pure junk science, unfortunately picked up by mainstream media, like all this BS.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:01 AM
1

Copernicus was also thought to be a moron. The opinions of others are only tendentiously linked to the truth. That having been said, if being feminist making it easier to get laid enters into your calculus when deciding what ideological movement to support, I think you're a moron and would much rather you just go away. This post is a waste of our time.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:59 PM
14

To a woman, 5'7" is short. Sorry man.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:45 PM
2

To your question a question: why are you such a fucking moron?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:42 PM
6

HOW CAN WE GO ON WHEN OUR AVATARS HAVE TO ENDURE SUCH INJUSTICE
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:57 AM
3

So it sounds like he was perfect because he could give her things. Anybody else picking up on some double standards here?
/r/MensRights27/08/14 06:40 AM
2

Pros: none, except tendentious peace of mind (see below). Cons: they get thrown out all the goddamn time. They're unenforceable. Loopholes: all the usual loopholes associated with any contract. They can be wriggled out of quite easily. One part's counsel can argue that his client was forced to sign the agreement under duress (therefore nullifying the agreement); he can claim coercion (nullifying the agreement); or fear of ostracism from one's family (which, you guessed it, nullifies the agreemen…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:03 PM
1

C'mon Uncle Joe!
/r/MensRights15/08/14 05:06 AM
1

Good dedication. I would have crapped out after the second paragraph.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 09:37 PM
1

How did you squeeze so much awesome into one comment?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:40 AM
1

No biggie. I just think the babysitter is worse.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 10:12 PM
2

It wasn't his aunt, it was his babysitter. His auntie was a racist and physically abused him.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:29 AM
2

No we don't. They Y chromosome is alive and well.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 09:52 PM
1

You mean stupid, like when somebody spells ad hominem incorrectly?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:04 AM
1

I've already given a bunch of evidence to that effect, dude. I'm not going to retread old ground. I'm unsure if this long line of Socratic questioning is some weird meta-argument about what you perceive to be my prejudices, or if you're being deliberately dense. Whatever the case, I've explained my feelings on the matter, expanded where necessary, and provided evidence both concrete and anecdotal. Bye bye, troll.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:24 PM
1

Yes to both.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:52 PM
1

I couldn't have said it better myself. Thank you.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:42 AM
1

I've been told I have a very scary voice, so I must capitalize on this phenomenon ASAP.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:25 AM
1

Not necessarily, no. People can still be sexually ethical while being sexually promiscuous. I believe it is shallow and distasteful for me, and I would feel the same way about a woman in whom I was romantically interested. By way of analogy, if somebody I knew ate McDonald's once in his life, that doesn't mean he's an unhealthy piece of shit. Sexual practices can be an indicator of character, but not always. Regarding me being "lucky": dude, you are into what you are into, and if you and your wi…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:18 AM
1

Getting laws off the books is nigh-impossible. So the de facto practice is just to stop enforcing them. This law is the relic of a time when women's chastity was a relevant bargaining chip when it came to marrying her off.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:54 AM
14

Stick to your guns. Don't fail to practice your beliefs because some people are pushy. Yeah. It happens. Rejection is hard to swallow. In my experience (I'm heterosexual), women take it particularly hard. Maybe explain your reasoning. If this an adult human, hopefully she'll understand. If she doesn't, move on.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:52 AM
3

Jesus, dude. Why the 20 questions? To answer: I know that's what you meant. I was saying that's a ridiculous constraint to place on my answer, because those risks are part of what I find distasteful about the practice. E.g. "Why do you hate fish? Don't mention the texture or the taste in your answer." Because I do. There's really no more to it than that. It's the same idea as somebody being financially frugal instead of spending lavishly. Sexual intercourse is physical intimacy. I reserve genuin…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:32 AM
3

No, I'm not going to ignore the risks of STIs and pregnancy. Those are distinct risks of the sexual cost-benefit analysis. I find it to be shallow because I believe humans should care deeply for the people they fuck, not people they have just met or whose parts they like. Promiscuity flies in the face of that rationale. Again, if other people want to do so, that's fine. I don't practice burning the flag, either. Re: evidence, you mean other than this? http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 11:55 PM
3

I find promiscuity to be shallow and distasteful, not to mention the risks of potential STIs and/or pregnancy due to poor birth control usage (often due to the influence of alcohol) in short term sexual relationships/one-night stands. Also, when one has ranged far afield sexually, it's usually a marker of some type of wanderlust, be it merely sexual or something more. As I am not interested in an open relationship or polyamory, this boils down to a greater likelihood of being cheated upon. Thank…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 11:16 PM
3

I wouldn't get married to anybody in the first place. If women, men, or anybody want to be promiscuous, that's fine. But I would not consider having a committed relationship with a promiscuous person, no. For the record, no, there is no double standard, because I make sure not to slut around either.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:50 PM
3

I am.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:28 AM
3

Everyone should listen to the MRA interviewed on this podcast. He's cogent, conciliatory, smart, and poised.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 12:32 AM
3

I'll stay right where I'm at, troll. Kisses.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:32 PM
5

So instead of answering the allegedly irrational person's request for evidence, you just repeated an unsupported statement. The troll is strong in this one.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:19 PM
5

Irrational in what way? I responded to OP saying that no, I do still help people, including women, in need. You replied like a jackhole by telling me that the MHRM is about "re-establishing traditional values", so I called you a troll. That doesn't make me irrational, it just means I think you're an asshole.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:09 PM
8

Are you a professional troll, or did you just get lost on your way to the Redpill?
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:51 PM
12

Maybe you're here to "re-establish traditional values". You also don't speak for everyone here. I'm here to speak out against the discrimination men face in civil society, the courts, schools, and the workplace. I don't go out of my way to seek damsels in distress. I'm not Batman. If I see a person in trouble, I would help him (or her), because that is what I believe is right. I also never claimed to be saving anybody "from themselves". Getting a flat tire, or tripping and falling, or having you…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 10:29 PM
2

I don't disagree. I've just never been one to heed that self-preservation instinct. Hopefully karma is real. shrugs
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:35 PM
25

I help others out irrespective of gender. Helping women probably does open one up to unique risks, but my conscience won't let me get away with ignoring others' suffering.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:51 PM
4

Granted the tone was snarky, but considering that this came from HuffPost I am amazed at the relative lack of editorializing.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:14 AM
2

You made an excellent argument. Thank you.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:42 PM
7

Until you personally come face to face with the federal government, you don't realize what a mammoth clusterfuck it is. And then one day it happens, and you can't ever look back.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:16 PM
25

HOLY CRAP, THIS IS AWESOME
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:15 PM
2

But nobody gives a shit about the content of his statements re: Gaza and Hamas? Way to go everybody.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:15 AM
1

NOT A RELATIONSHIP, RAPE
/r/MensRights19/07/14 01:17 AM
9

FFS IT WASN'T SEX IT WAS FUCKING RAPE
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:49 AM
1

How convenient for feminism that it can chameleon into whatever value system a level-headed person tries to espouse.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 05:58 AM
0

It's good to not let hypocrisy and self-serving bullshit go unnoticed, yes.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:53 PM
0

Correct, you can still make sound investments, but when those investments are in products that directly contravene the religious mandate (e.g. contraceptives are bad) that you went to court to advocate for, you're a fucking hypocrite. Either it's all OK, or none of it is OK.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:15 AM
-1

And their retirement plan invests in morning-after pills and other contraceptives. So apparently religion is only important when it doesn't carry a stock dividend. Nevermind the legal clusterfuck SCOTUS just wandered into with its ruling.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 12:40 PM
0

This.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 04:29 PM
1

GUYS SHE JUST NAFALT'ED US! SOUND THE ALARM!!!
/r/MensRights30/06/14 08:03 AM
0

They conveniently left out the 4-7 days a month where women are "sick" and can barely function.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 06:46 PM
2

Am handsome, can confirm.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:02 AM
3

No.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:54 PM
1

Who...? Why...?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:09 AM
3

So considering that this article appeared in TIME, I am amazed.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:04 AM
1

Uh, what? I've never heard of that. Do you have a source?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:55 AM
1

rite*
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:45 PM
0

This.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:34 PM
7

This is true, and it is a large part of the problem. Women are socialized from a young age to not think of their violence as significant or harmful. The end result is women hitting their husbands, or drunk women pummeling men, because they've conflated "female violence" with "inconsequential".
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:27 PM
1

Well...fuck me sideways.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:26 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NDPT0Ph5rA
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:24 PM
-2

Example: he also talks about how Muslims have an inferior culture because they're "stuck in the 1500s".
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:21 PM
0

A. Let's try to remember he's a comedian. B. That having been said, he should STFU about 90% of real intellectual topics. If you recall, he also endorsed MGM, calling uncircumcised penises "gross".
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:50 PM
1

I think the biggest problem with being a man raised by women is that it makes it difficult for you to socialize with other men and gain male friends, which is what ultimately causes the loneliness.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:39 AM
3

It's a racial slur. Idiot.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:38 AM
2

The speaker of that sentence was contrasting the frequency with which women raise children alone versus men having to learn how to work and raise children concurrently.. Which as any single father will tell you is absolute bullshit. It wasn't an example, it was a paradigm for men to aspire to.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 06:29 PM
7

"They [women] have to raise kids on their own..." Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 05:41 PM
1

I wonder how long before they crucify this guy too.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:38 PM
2

Upvotes just for the title. However, I'm guessing this isn't as big a deal as we think. Jack O'Brien (the editor in chief) probably had to OK that article before it ran.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:57 AM
12

She sounds nice. I think you should go for it.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:11 PM
4

Innocent until proven guilty, guys.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:08 AM
20

It's because feminism has been institutionalized at the highest levels - academia (MacKinnon), politics (McCaskill), journalism (Steinem), speculative writing (Rosin), even biology (I forgot my example of that one, but she exists). Any time an ideology is enshrined there will be gaps in thinking and inevitable biases. Not surprised, just angry.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 01:59 AM
2

I know that this is the case, but every time I see it in graphical form it breaks my heart. It reminds me of a temp job I worked where I was the only non-black, non ex-con dude on crew. Every single man had stories of his friends being murdered, or going to prison for 25 to life.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 12:31 AM
2

I have encountered every one of these argumentative strategies before. I'm sure many others have, also. Good post.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:17 PM
1

Jesus...black Americans are about 1/3 of the perpetrators, but just under half of the victims.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:16 PM
3

Remember how they wrote an article about hitting their boyfriends? What the fuck.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:15 AM
1

I'm uninsured, so I have been unable to seek psychological counseling. However, reaction has been mixed among close friends (the only people whom I have told).
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:02 AM
2

Although the way women as a group seem to apologize for every little thing is so annoying. It devalues apologizing.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:00 AM
3

If you can't resolve a disagreement with your girlfriend except by avoiding the topic completely, there is a larger problem.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:29 PM
3

Not surprised, just disappointed.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:49 AM
19

For the love of God, it's a criminal accusation. Take it to the courts.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:49 AM
1

Unless there's an impending invasion by Redcoats, I think we're safe.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:34 PM
2

This reminds me of Pascal's wager.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 02:43 AM
5

This. A thousand times this.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:44 PM
27

I think that you're a fucking idiot. She's a rapist. A child cannot give consent; the gender of his assailant is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:52 PM
3

Dude, it's Game of Thrones. You can count the number of times fathers are nice to their kids on one hand. Plain old topical humor. I find the harpies demanding the end of the holiday much more disconcerting.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:44 PM
4

God I hate Twitter.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:18 PM
6

They even mention the SPLC! Thanks morons!
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:05 PM
4

Good for him. I'm glad he's the voice of reason in this goddamn mess.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 06:03 PM
5

Google "sympathetic pregnancy".
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:43 AM
4

I may just be noobing here, but how does Reddit in particular have a hard time confronting that fact? [Also: I agree that men hate using condoms. I would just add that many women do too, for reasons of both spontaneity and loss of sensation and lubrication.] Do people really think the Gates Foundation is making a joke? One of their biggest agenda items is reducing HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa, and actually convincing people in those countries to wear condoms in their current incarnation is fuc…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:44 PM
1

Happy to help.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:39 AM
1

Unfortunately I'm not a medical expert, so I can't speak broadly. However, a female acquaintance of mine who suffered cysts as a result of BCP opted for an IUD instead, and her doctor corralled both she and her boyfriend in the room to make sure they both understood that they could not have kids for the 5 year life of her IUD. So that's at least one model that has longer-term restrictions.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:26 AM
1

Many of those models also have a minimum life of five years. So for example, you get one when you're 25, no kids till 30 at least.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:07 AM
1

Dude my sis was the same way the first pill dose she went on in high school. It was a total hellhole to live there for like six months.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:06 AM
1

Yes, but that doesn't acknowledge just how much unprotected sex occurs. I agree that there should be an effort to build a better mousetrap, and that is good; however, as long as humans are human, they will hate condom use. Just an observation.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 09:04 AM
1

Although bear in mind that it's not an either-or; many women will, for example, have their sex drives dry up on a high-dose estrogen pill, and see it spike right back up due to a lower dose.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:36 AM
2

Nobody likes balloons on their dicks, that's why.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:34 AM
19

Whatever Bill Gates's foundation is offered a huge cash prize for the next gen condom - "one that people actually wear" was the tag line, I think. Personally, I think we'll get Vasalgel before we get an improved condom.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:38 PM
3

One ex-girlfriend threw pots and pans at my head. Like, saucepans and frypans. At the place where I store my brain. Was in an argument with the same girlfriend, I finally tell her "fuck it, I'm going to sleep". She asks to have sex with me. I said no. I wake up two hours later and hello, I am being raped by said girlfriend. Ex-girlfriend (different one) smacks me super hard in the face. Didn't happen again, when confronted she said she "made a mistake". When explaining the situation to my mother…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:04 AM
1

I'm not a Playboy expert, so IDK if she was a full Playmate since she wasn't a centerfold. But either way...that's the Michigan difference right there. Avoiding that face-bearing-down-on-you action is like racing toward a brick wall. I hate it.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:48 AM
3

I think that allowing certain behaviors in your youth that you never would later in life is pretty universal, so you are not alone. For instance, at that same bar there was a girl from the Playboy Girls of the Big Ten issue (no joke) who said she would bump my tip from 20 to 25% if I gave her a hug (I don't know why that was alluring to her). I did, and she grabbed two full scoops of sweet ass. (Not expecting that.) [Sidebar: I felt like a cheap whore, it bothered me a lot. But I had a tuition p…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:33 AM
10

Perhaps I am in the minority, but it drives me up the goddamn wall. The uninvited touching while I was doing my job was bad. The presumption that it was cool, or that I would fold and give them things IF THEY WOULD JUST TOUCH IT, was worse.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:19 AM
2

It's a convenient little double bind.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:00 AM
6

You are correct, sir. Check my post history if you're interested in similar stories - I worked the door and waiting tables in a bar for years, and the number of times I had my cock or ass grabbed was mind-boggling.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:00 AM
30

And when you're a man who does have those traits, when you turn down female attention, you had better take cover, because cries of "asshole" and "d-bag" are headed your way.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:07 PM
9

Then maybe don't comment on circumcision if you don't know what the parts of genitalia are. Labia are the "lips" of the vagina (in some women, they dangle; in others, they tuck in), below the clitoris, at the entrance to the vagina itself.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:48 PM
7

So can labia. Should we chop those off too?
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:37 PM
2

Individual counseling for him, couples' counseling for the two of you. With a male counselor, preferably with a specialization in DV experiences. I have no idea how the two of you argue, but if your disagreements ever escalate into yelling or name-calling that could easily set him off. If that's an issue, address it (both on your own and in counseling). Make no mistake, if he has not been to a shrink and he is reacting this way, the dude has PTSD. The good news is that he can work through it and…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 07:31 PM
1

Rape is bad, mkay.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:48 AM
3

The CDC, unfortunately, isn't infallible. The organizations that often "find" confirmation of health benefits are usually those organizations that perform circumcisions. Coincidence? Hurr durr. Most of those studies utilize shitty methodologies. Every "benefit" generated by circumcision (usually the greater difficulty of contracting HIV) is a result of some corresponding detriment (e.g., keratinization of the glans) and could be done equally as well with, you guessed it, condoms. Did I mention i…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:58 AM
2

In the 1800s, lobotomies were performed on "imbeciles" because they were believed to be beneficial to those people's health and happiness. Male Circumcision has absolutely zero health benefits. It actually is cause for many types of sexual dysfunction. Oh yeah, and it's a fucking crime. For fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:24 AM
1

Did Arthur Chu really just use the word "grok" in a capacity other than quoting Stranger? What an asshole. By and large, you are correct. The number of times I've had to explain to a female friend, or a girlfriend, or whoever, my thoughts about sexual intercourse and my desire for it is so depressing. I know I'm not alone there - every male friend I know has had similar experiences. I think what's more important even than that is the total lack of interest in understanding male sexuality - it's …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:24 PM
2

The problem there is that academic feminism - which I'm defining here as feminism fostered with gender studies departments at universities- encourages such forms of protest. Stick around the sub for a while, and you'll see video submissions which provide proof. Or if you're impatient, Google "University of Toronto Men's Rights Protest" or "Professor attacks Abortion Protester". These feminists seem to have huge problems with free discourse that does not agree with theirs.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:54 AM
3

Well, this is fucking depressing.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:48 AM
2

He was mixed, for fuck's sake. They're trimming the evidence to fit the ideology.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:29 PM
1

Yeah that's pretty much where I was going.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:20 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_IX
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:58 AM
1

Wiener ahoy.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:57 AM
4

Men enforcing silence is of course a factor; however, it is not of the same magnitude as academic feminism protesting men's gatherings, insisting that they be banned, or calling them hate groups. One is passive silence; the other is actively causing it, when people clearly wish to speak.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:46 AM
1

Under the ACA it's like this in the States too.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:58 AM
10

Femsplain is hilarious. Wymyn is hilarious. Satire is as powerful as critique. Excelsior, I say.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:22 PM
11

This is the same logic that makes statements like "If you believe in equal rights you're a feminist." It's a sine qua non. I don't know how the hell they get away with that sort of illogic, but there it is.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 08:48 PM
4

Same reason doctors used to lobotomize people suffering from a host of mental disorders.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 08:44 PM
3

The devil can quote Scripture to suit his purpose.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:08 PM
2

We maintain a small P.O. box. To access it, just upload an Imgur file of your neckbeard and post it to the comments. We will respond promptly. Unfortunately, uniforms are currently on back order.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 08:40 AM
5

I tell myself that I should read a wide range of websites so I can be an informed human being, but it adversely affects my blood pressure every time.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:34 PM
3

TIL that masculinity is all about how men behave toward women, and nothing else.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:00 PM
13

This is why people snicker when HuffPo says "We're journalists, okay!"
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:55 PM
1

So goddamn sad.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:36 PM
0

I mean, sure? But you're splitting the thinnest of hairs. It is one's right as a (monogamous) spouse to have a faithful partner. So in your formulation, his exercising of his rights violates her rights. [Side note: take away someone's rights, nothing bad happens if you are in a position of power. See: U.S. government.]
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:33 PM
1

If spouses didn't have a right to fidelity from their partners, infidelity wouldn't be grounds for divorce. They do, and it is.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:22 PM
8

Assuming they are not in an open relationship, the boss's wife has every goddamn right to her husband's fidelity.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:50 AM
2

The point I am making is that they would get you in line just like everyone else. Short of actually physically deserting, you would have a very hard time not being affected by military indoc, if only to avoid more torture.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 04:38 AM
2

Good luck keeping up that bravado with a chief, gunny, or first sergeant in your face while you do 8 counts for an hour.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:58 PM
2

Whether intentional or not, the number of female servicemembers who have to leave deployment (be it from a Navy ship, a FOB, or whatever) is incredibly high. Not only does the government spend a considerable sum to train those servicemembers prior to deployment, more money is lost when medevac'ed out/only serving part of deployment. For the record, naval ships are the worst. Think of it as a floating college campus.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:49 PM
1

I hope they at least pay the male talent well.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:43 PM
4

WHY WOULD YOU GIVE A LAPDANCE TO A CHILD WHY WHY
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:36 AM
1

Here's the real mindfuck: people have been surviving in conditions that harsh for thousands of years. Modern technology was just to make the nights more comfortable. Absurd.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 07:00 AM
1

"I recognize that my sexual standards are acculturated. However, let me explain why they are special and legitimate and totally different from others."
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:59 AM
1

Sad head shake
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:58 AM
5

I'm 6'1". The number of women who have said some variation of "It's good you're tall, short guys weird me out" to me makes me sad and pissed. I am sure every other other tall guy in the world has had similar experiences.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:58 PM
1

FTFY
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:56 PM
2

To borrow the article's language, "My preference for this is probably a result of unconscious social conditioning. (Which is my excuse, and I'm sticking to it.)"
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:54 PM
5

I think titties sell comic books, and comic books' target demo consists of readers who love outrageously sized ones. People can wax philosophical about the alleged implications of the way characters are depicted, and that's fine; if what you want is to stop those depictions from being made at all because it bothers you, get fucked. (Exempli gratia: it really fucking irritates me that Calvin Klein underwear models are at once so jacked and cut, mostly because I get a little jealous. They're free …
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:27 AM
6

The feminist thinking often doesn't exclude male-on-male (e.g. prison) rape. Their idea is that rape is a crime perpetrated by a penis or other penetrative object - the act of "invading" another person's body is what gives rape its pernicious power. It's stupid, but that's what they think anyway.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:49 PM
1

TIL Canada has an arid desert. Weird...
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:34 PM
1

I think it's a matter of the federal administration determining the priorities of higher ed when it comes to policy - basically, "make these things happen or we'll cut federal funding" (e.g. the 55 colleges and universities who recently landed in hot water). What saddens me is that this diminishes the level of intellectual and academic freedom at institutions where it's supposed to be standard.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:29 PM
1

Although you're probably right about the level of corruption (cough Wall Street cough), I have a sneaking suspicion that the laws against one-party consent recording have more to do with American expectations of privacy from surveillance (I'm no constitutional scholar, however). Those are quite the temperature swings. Round these parts we go from -30F to 90F.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:28 AM
10

As complaints of sexual assault in the military are handled within the chain of command (this was actually in the news recently, you might have heard about it) very often the alleged assailant works with the alleged victim, often in a position of power (E-6 to the victim's E-4, for example). Therefore lodging any complaint can destroy unit cohesion and generate significant blowback against the alleged victim. Further, since COs make the decision to prosecute (and may have heard exemplary things …
/r/MensRights04/05/14 05:40 AM
8

I'm glad you came out from under the bridge to say hello.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 05:12 AM
0

Called it!
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:59 AM
7

Yep. It's a stain on the honor of the U.S. military.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:26 AM
1

You Canadians are so lucky. Except for the winter thing.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:33 AM
9

What I find bizarre about this phenomenon is, these collegiate boards were set up to handle things like plagiarism and academic misconduct, not criminal sexual behavior. So why the hell are we relying on those same institutions to prosecute what should be a criminal investigation? They're asking the housekeeper to fix the car engine.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 01:30 AM
1

Really? I believe you, but I've never heard that before. Do you happen to have a source? Also, side note: probably not all sexual encounters will take place inside one's home, so that would only go so far.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 01:27 AM
1

Maybe smart, but unethical and (in many states) illegal without two-party consent.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 11:53 PM
1

Salon also did a bang-up job of sensationalizing the case and presuming guilt. They also recently published a very sympathetic review of the book covering the case (which coincidentally tried to defend Nifong). ...But it's Salon, no surprise there.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:12 PM
19

Yeah, that's a sexist argument. If we're not going to tell women what they can and can't do with their eggs or uteruses (which we shouldn't), we can't expect men to relinquish all rights to their genetic material (sperm) after it leaves their bodies. If you don't want to have a kid, you shouldn't be forced to have a kid, raise a kid, or financially support a kid. The end.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:09 PM
2

Reading stuff like this gives me Vietnam flashbacks. Especially knowing that if I called 911 on the women who assaulted me, they would have cuffed my ass (6'1", 200#) immediately. /endrant
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:46 PM
3

God dammit...
/r/MensRights03/05/14 04:31 PM
2

This website is not the best, but it has links (at the bottom) to some of the firsthand documents (statements and interviews with the alleged assailant and alleged victim): http://www.washtenawwatchdogs.com/4/post/2013/08/the-cover-up-of-the-arrest-of-university-of-michigan-football-player-brendan-gibbons-for-rape.html Also, Lewan did get in trouble for threatening the alleged victim. I believe the words he used were along the lines of "if you don't shut up I'll rape you because Brendan sure did…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:03 PM
3

The fedora is reserved for when I'm a day late downloading TOR updates.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 08:40 PM
1

Yeah, this is kind of a moronic listicle.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:02 PM
1

Good old Seattle. Most passive-aggressive, radfem city in the U.S.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:57 PM
2

Yes, your concerns are legitimate. I believe the accepted figure for male sexual assault victimization is 52% (52% of victims are male). However, due to popular misconceptions about men and sexual assault, they and the media focus on female servicemembers. When in doubt, remember that it's the U.S. military. Having gone through the SAPR training myself, it's not very informative for anybody who isn't a raw 18-year old recruit.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:55 PM
10

Nope, I don't care strongly about anything. I'm just a contrarian neckbeard. This girl cuts deep.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:51 PM
-1

I wonder some times if the gremlin in my TV is angry at me because the box won't turn on.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:54 PM
2

Every single woman I have ever slept with has said the words, "Uncircumcised penises are gross". Drives me up the wall.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:51 PM
2

A) Contemporary, third-wave feminism often demonizes male sexuality, social interaction, competitive drive, etc. There are expressions of this all over. It starts when men are still boys, and continues into adulthood - men are browbeaten for being men by female figures in their lives, especially spouses (think in popular culture the dotard husband who can't take care of the kids, gambles away the mortgage payment, etc.) In a lot of feminist thought (esp. Mackinnon, Dworkin, and the like), mascul…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:21 AM
3

Plus she's against porn.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 08:05 PM
5

I mean, it's Yoko. In addition to being a band-slayer, she made some stupid music. No surprises there.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:50 PM
1

Good post.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:49 PM
2

This article is awesome.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:58 PM
1

Sure...but most men don't want to masturbate ad infinitum, or have sex with Real Dolls exclusively, or frequent prostitutes only. We all eventually want some degree of human connection in our sexual encounters, which self-love and transitory hook-ups can't provide. I think you're right in saying that popular feminism has exacerbated the natural tendency of the human sexual marketplace (that is, to have males vying for female attention and acceptance). We all should be less willing to deal with p…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:49 PM
2

Because men's and women's athletic programs have to have the same number of sports offerings, some very skilled athletes end up playing club sports when they would have played varsity. For example, at the University of Michigan, there is a women's varsity water polo team. The men's team is club. There is a women's crew team. The men's is just club (despite being awesome). Often this disparity is "ironed out" by the presence of the "big" male sport (football), so female athletes get an extra spor…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:26 PM
-2

Except we have these things called dicks, which make celibacy impossible.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:20 PM
1

Alpha females and black women aren't synonymous, dummy.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:17 PM
7

Yikes.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:00 PM
2

Here's one: http://time.com/37337/nearly-half-of-young-men-say-theyve-had-unwanted-sex/
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:58 PM
1

You just made me laugh out loud.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:09 PM
1

Certainly possible, unless OP uses other students as sources. It depends on how hard he wants to argue the issue. Of course they do. However, that's one of the dean's jobs: dealing with student concerns.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 12:15 AM
2

"rape of all kinds is like a feminist issue" False. Rape of all kinds is a human rights issue. The canard that rape disproportionately affects women is false. The "1 in 4" statistic is wildly inflated (the conductors of the study skewed results to get such a high number). http://time.com/37337/nearly-half-of-young-men-say-theyve-had-unwanted-sex/ I'll just leave that there. The CDC, as of 2011, defined women raping men as almost impossible - basically, you could only rape if you used a penis (or…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 03:10 PM
1

I mean, I could be wrong. I had a dispute over classroom instruction that was addressed pretty fairly by the dean when I was at school; it might be different when it comes to disputing ideological intolerance. Were I the OP, though, I'd rather stick my toe in the water than do nothing and sit there steaming.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 02:37 PM
3

Historically, yes. But I think you know what I was getting at. (I was talking about contemporary philosophy vs. classical philosophy, which was much more concerned with metaphysics and utilized relatively unscientific models to explain the universe. See logos in Stoic thought for an example.)
/r/MensRights21/04/14 06:06 AM
14

I agree with the general thrust of your argument. However, Philosophy isn't a (hard) scientific discipline, so calling it a pseudo science as an insult is missing the point. It appropriates scientific methods and information into its conclusions, sure, but that's not the same thing. Your link makes a pretty extreme example. What I told OP was that, if he speaks up and his prof docks him points, he should go to the dean. While Harvard's prez might not have been able to question the spatial reason…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 02:59 AM
15

I think it was Camille Paglia who wrote a column with sentiments similar to yours in response to Hanna Rosin's The End of Men. Basically, the argument went that academic feminists are enabled to say those sorts of statements ("men are obsolte") since they occupy a niche that doesn't have to worry about roads being paved, or the electrical wiring being done, etc. It was pretty fascinating, and totally spot-on. Highlights a strange black hole many feminists have in their thinking.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:01 AM
–

If you want to speak up, speak up. If your philosophy professor, of all people, is going to deduct points from your grade due to a different viewpoint, 1) he's an asshat, and 2) take it to the dean. There should be a policy against deduction of grade points due to personal beliefs somewhere in the grading policy.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:52 PM
10

Because it will help them win elections. Men usually have much lower voter turnout than women. That, compounded with it being a midterm election (when voter turnout, especially Democratic, is much lower), the sabotaging of jobs bills (which would have benefited largely male professions), and the growth of female-dominated job fields in the same time frame means that even if men turn out to vote, the won't vote blue. So the Dems are turning to a demo they think can help them avoid a Senate sweep:…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 02:17 PM
0

Mmmmmmooist.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:13 AM
1

To an extent, sure. But that's the baby with the bathwater. Some (maybe many) reporters and correspondents want to get sweet consulting or lobbying jobs, but not all. CBS in particular seems to toe the party line less than the other news outlets (e.g. NBC or some of the more moderate people on MSNBC). I'm sure if you graphed out the dissent against Obama, it would grow incrementally as his administration aged. Also, while I get what you mean (and agree), speaking "truth to power" was never the c…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 11:42 PM
3

Yes and no. The narrative that the 77 cent figure is false/distorted has been making the rounds for a while now, from many sources (although they haven't gone as far as "knowingly false so we could maybe win in November" out loud, it was sometimes implied). Also, now that Obama is drawing closer to the end of his presidency, reporters for the major news networks are probably less worried about pissing off their sources in the White House.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:48 PM
1

With all the man-hours spent writing dumbass listicles like this in every publication known to man, we could have built tokomak reactors and a colony on Mars.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:11 PM
18

In other breaking news, water is wet.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:55 PM
2

Wall of text ahead. Two major currents for me, one related to university education, the other my personal experiences. Personal: I was recircumcised as a two-year old (check my submissions, I posted a little essay on it) and the continual bullshit I dealt with as a result of that made me question circumcision. I've been sexually assaulted by a former girlfriend before. Had an ex girlfriend smack me in the face on a couple occasions. When I said I would call police she said, verbatim, "Go ahead, …
/r/MensRights14/04/14 06:49 PM
2

I actually saw that same picture. It was awesome. Long story short, you are correct. I also encountered an article today that presented findings of a group of Czech scientists claiming that "people can use facial cues to predict intelligence...so long as the subject was male". This sort of thing occurs constantly, in every area of the culture.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:28 AM
1

Well, you're an enormous troll. So I'll just ignore you.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 11:56 PM
1

Okay, dude. This piece really isn't about my relationship with my parents, nor is it intended to attack either one. It's limiting to just place blame and leave it at that, because responsibility for a cultural practice like MGM is not squarely on the shoulders of two people - it's on that society as a whole. I do think it is problematic that parents in the United States don't critically examine the reasons they cut the penises of their male children, but I am much more upset by the medical estab…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:06 PM
2

Honestly I'm not too concerned about my relationship with my mom. It's okay, she's a nice person. We talk about the weather. Plus this was 12 years ago, so while it's entirely possible that she reacted in such a way out of anxiety or guilt or something, it's water under the bridge. I do think it's important to note, though, that she (dismissively) compared my experience at the doctor's with my sister's. I think that most parents, if their daughter burst into tears prior to her first pelvic exam,…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 08:48 AM
2

Sorry for the Google Drive link, guys. Anyway, I hope my experience speaks to some of the difficulties a lot of us have had regarding the practice of male circumcision, and that sharing my story raises some awareness about the issue and makes people feel less alone.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter