TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ImNotAPersonAnymore Archive

View 3 posts and 464 comments by ImNotAPersonAnymore on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
82

I’m glad this is sloooowly becoming more mainstream. MGM has no redeeming factor whatsoever except some cultures value it, almost like a fetish. It needs to end.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 05:04 PM
30

Not even “basically”. It’s GM.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 05:00 PM
6

I think the counter argument is that, if the punishment is too severe, honest accusers would also be scared to come forward. But I still think the punishment for false accusation should be the same as what their victims would have received.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 01:26 PM
3

It’s genital mutilation and a worse sexual violation than most rapes. And it’s so widespread, it’s easily one of the biggest issues men face. Yet most people, even on this sub, fail to see the gravity of it, and 30% of comments are “I’m fine” bros downplaying it or saying they’re glad they weren’t given the same protection and bodily autonomy that females get.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:57 AM
1

You said rape must have the intent of sexual gratification but that’s not even in the dictionary or the law, so…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 01:43 PM
1

So if a man forcibly inserted his penis into another man’s foreskin against his will, you wouldn’t consider that rape, because foreskin isn’t an orifice to you? I think most intact people would disagree. Also, doctors do “palpitate” (or whatever the medical word is) the baby to give them an erection before cutting. It’s standard procedure and I don’t think it matters why the doctor is doing it, since the baby doesn’t understand that and instead just experiences themselves being stimulated. And i…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 01:40 PM
3

And btw you should ask yourself why most here disagree with you
/r/MensRights26/04/26 04:29 AM
4

The intent doesn’t matter. For example you could use a broomstick. The victim’s experience is what matters. If it’s sexual to the victim then it might be rape. Also, the prepuce is an orifice that gets penetrated by the blunt tool that rips the foreskin off the glans, so it meets the penetration criterion, not that I really agree with that criterion. There’s multiple definitions of rape. A forced sexual violation that involves stripping you, strapping you naked with legs splayed, stroking you un…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 04:29 AM
2

It’s sexual for the victim. They give the baby an erection and then penetrate them with a probe to tear the foreskin away from the glans. Remember, rape doesn’t have to be sexual for the perpetrator, only for the victim.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:49 PM
3

Thanks for taking the time to educate people here. As a survivor of MGM, I appreciate you.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:12 PM
7

Women have a preference for clean mouth, too. Are you gonna extract your teeth instead of brushing them?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:03 PM
5

I’m sure you’re smarter than this. Even if you’re unaware of the foreskin being an orifice that gets penetrated, etc., you can realize by analogy that it’s a sexual violation.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:00 PM
9

There’s many different “styles” of male circumcision. How come you’re OK with someone choosing how much of your frenulum? Inner foreskin, total overall gliding, etc., that you got to keep? Maybe your cutting wasn’t as severe as some others’, but clearly the owner of the penis should get to decide.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 01:59 PM
7

What he said is accurate. The baby is made to get an erection the old fashioned way and then penetrated by force as the prepuce is an orifice and a blunt object is rammed inside to rip the foreskin off of the glans. It’s extremely painful at that age, like tearing a fingernail off. That’s always when the screams of agony start.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 01:56 PM
3

Rape isn’t necessarily sexual for the perpetrator. You can be raped by an object or by someone whose motivation isn’t sexual.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 01:52 PM
2

“Might be” mutilation? Also, why bother taking out a legal definition of rape to argue the meaning of something that’s clearly a violent sexual violation. If it happened to you as an adult, you’d call it that, right? If someone held you down, stripped off your clothes, touched you until you were erect, and then cut off part of your penis as you screamed in agony? It’s honestly worse than the standard rape.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 01:49 PM
2

Isn’t it a sexual violation?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 01:46 PM
11

It’s actually really depressing that even this subreddit struggles to see it. But it strikes at the core of male identity and almost no one who was cut had any say in it, so it’s understandable.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 01:45 PM
2

There’s a lot to say about it but I’m not sure it’s worth it. Why are you asking.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:58 PM
1

USA
/r/MensRights07/01/26 03:05 AM
6

We’re savages.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 03:01 AM
1

Definitely. But I appreciate your concern.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 04:14 AM
6

I was falsely accused as a high school student and got expelled. Lowkey ruined my life for many years.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 03:31 AM
3

It’s crazy that consensual trans surgeries are considered mutilation while nonconsensual circumcisions aren’t. I feel mutilated by my circumcision. And it’s not botched or anything. I just hate how I can’t glide or retract, and I hate all the sensation I lost. It was my fucking body and if I were a girl, my parents would’ve had no right to authorize it.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 01:42 AM
44

Same. Nothing is worse than the “my body my choice” feminists who say they’re for bodily autonomy but don’t care about male genital mutilation. Their stance is laughable.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 03:04 AM
6

I’m there already, been tugging for years. KoT.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 02:59 AM
18

I’ve spent most of my post-pubescent life wishing I’d been intact. It started with just being attracted to foreskins (I’m gay) and progressed to all the knowledge of what the foreskin is and does and the unique sex acts that require it. For example I wish I could stroke myself over my clothing without abrasion or friction and dock with other guys. More than anything, I wish I could feel with it. It’s very pleasurable.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 02:11 AM
4

I was circumcised and I agree with him.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 04:59 AM
36

I was thinking the same thing. Beavis and butthead call a lawyer who put an ad on TV saying, “are you being sexually harassed?” Eventually they get in front of a judge and the judge asks them how they’ve been harassed by the girls in their class, and they’re like, “uh… hehe.. hehe… they’re like uh… hehe hehe.. really hot” Great episode.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 06:45 AM
9

I agree, man… carrying some rando’s kid is crazy to me instead of adopting a kid who already needs a mother and father.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 04:31 PM
3

Thank you for sharing your story.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 07:32 AM
2

I’m so glad you and others on this sub bring up male genital mutilation. It’s the #1 men’s rights issue in the countries that practice it.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 05:46 AM
12

I’m mad about it.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 05:04 AM
15

Patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights17/05/24 10:27 PM
1

lol @ getting downvoted for that comment. This sub is so yikes sometimes.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 08:00 PM
1

So fathers uphold traditional gender stereotypes?
/r/MensRights04/05/24 09:59 PM
8

It’s one thing to cut off a piece of someone’s body against their will, but why should we also allow the body part to be sold for profit? Doesn’t that make it worse and even incentivize more mutilations?
/r/MensRights03/05/24 03:57 AM
9

Circumcision is a problem, yes, but why isn’t tissue harvesting also a problem?
/r/MensRights03/05/24 03:43 AM
27

That’s why I said “temporarily”.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 12:28 AM
2

Facts (as opposed to opinions) are statements that can be determined true or false objectively. E.g., “Alligators have 25,000 teeth” is a false fact. Anyway, I agree OP’s presentation of the material wasn’t going to persuade anyone. I’m glad it got removed.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:18 PM
2

Someone maybe forcibly retracted you when you were a boy. It’s common and causes micro scarring that leads to phimosis later. I’m sorry you lost your prepuce. Thanks for being honest that your opinion is biased due to the fact you had medical problems. On a purely theoretical level, if you cut off a feeling body part, you can’t feel with that body part anymore. Any supposedly scientific model that predicts or says otherwise is conceptually flawed. That said, the chronic exposure to your glans an…
/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:08 PM
2

The question is whether it evolved in a way that appears to have been orchestrated, or whether it was actually orchestrated. I believe it’s the former.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:03 PM
3

Facts can be either true or false, and there’s massive debate over the truthfulness of facts relating to male circumcision. Not resorting to facts can therefore be helpful when discussing the ethics of forced genital cutting. Bad actors (for example Brian Morris) have flooded the scientific discourse with false facts such as that circumcision doesn’t result in the loss of sensation.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:57 PM
0

His concerns are valid though. He’s not generally wrong about anything he said, although the writing style is a bit odd with, shall we say, rich imagery. Real talk, did you read it? Are you against genital cutting of minors?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:32 PM
0

Ur just lashing out that dad didn't say no for you This hurts. My dad didn’t protect me and now I advocate for others to be protected.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:31 PM
3

I agree except Abrahamic religions are not now solely responsible. It’s been medicalized and fetishized.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:26 PM
2

How so?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:24 PM
0

What specific thing did they say about circumcision that wasn’t factual and true?
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:23 PM
1

It’s how circumcision works, at least in USA. The mothers are often drugged from pain relievers when they consent, and of course the victim whose body part is being amputated doesn’t consent. Regarding FGM myths, basically every last one of them has the effect of making infant male circumcision seem more acceptable. “It’s usually glans removal”, “they can’t orgasm or experience sexual pleasure afterwards”, “it’s perpetrated with malice”, “it’s mainly men doing it against girls”, etc.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:20 PM
3

Just go ahead and say what you think you know about FGM, and it’ll turn out to be a myth. Go ahead.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 07:10 PM
40

Yep. MGM is the biggest obstacle in eradicating FGM, but they don’t care enough about boys, so ironically everyone gets cut.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:49 PM
110

Forced prepuce amputation of girls = “gender-based violence” Forced prepuce amputation of boys = “healthcare”
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:20 PM
13

whingers ? What are you talking about, man. The MRA page?
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:17 PM
3

It sounded like she lost most of her status when she transitioned from cis to trans. Besides being judged more harshly by her height, everything else was just a loss of beauty due to effects of T, becoming a dude without a penis, and in general becoming a trans instead of a cis.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 02:37 PM
6

I agree. Some of the shit on here is pretty cringe and it’s disappointing it’s not downvoted. Like saying “all power comes from men”. But this sub isn’t worse than feminist subs. And to the extent feminist subs are just showing women love, I think it’s good for this sub to do the same for men. But ideally the focus would be on actual equality and improving communication and forming an alliance for the betterment of both sexes, rather than airing grievances and trying to 1-up each other.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 10:07 PM
10

Where does it seem to treat women as a monolith? It’s just evidence of misandry, since many insist it doesn’t exist at all.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 08:49 PM
10

The presence of men attracts many people.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:11 PM
2

Source? Because pheromones smell pretty fuckin’ good to me. 😍
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:35 AM
5

How do you know?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:32 AM
1

That’s an irresponsible comment. You didn’t do the research yourself or you’d realize OP is correct.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:32 AM
1

You’re not sure if we should be mutilating boys to suit the taste of women? Really?
/r/MensRights06/04/24 12:58 AM
3

Here’s a dad on this very post, saying, “it’s my son and my choice!!” https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/8IcrVvunav
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:55 PM
2

I’m gonna take that as a “yes, I’m American”. Well, most of the world is opposed to forced circumcision of minors. If that seems like “only Reddit” to you then I’d say your world is a bit small.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:28 PM
3

If your dad had had the courage and knowledge to keep you intact, statistically, you’d be very, very glad he did.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:20 PM
3

Why do you say “reddit” like it’s not real life? Are you American?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:09 PM
8

It’s not easier to wash or keep clean, bro. I think you know that. It boils down to you not wanting your son to have something that you didn’t have. That’s sad, because you could’ve helped him and given him a gift that was denied you.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:14 AM
10

Did you ask your son how much and which parts of his prepuce he wanted removed?
/r/MensRights05/04/24 02:31 AM
11

It’s major mutilation actually.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 01:23 AM
11

Until dad who was circumcised wants to circumcise his son and mom doesn’t want to
/r/MensRights05/04/24 01:22 AM
31

Very few men who were circumcised chose it for themselves.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 01:21 AM
13

Good dad.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 01:18 AM
1

Then start caring who’s to blame
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:39 PM
1

Mom’s generally get the final say but the fathers who were cut themselves are by far the most ardent supporters. More female influence here would actually save boys on average.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:35 PM
4

? I just said it. Circumcised peoples, male or female, are the most ardent defenders of the practice.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:20 PM
-6

Of course. But when guys say, “women need to stop making decisions about guys’ dicks!!” I cringe because that would only increase the number of victims.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 09:00 PM
-2

According to the book The Hidden Trauma by Ron Goldman, when parents disagree on whether to mutilate a boy, 90% of the time it’s the father in favor of it.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 08:15 PM
-20

Honestly, more women need to be involved. Men are the biggest proponents of this garbage.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 08:08 PM
7

Oh no, but that’s cutting off the clit. /s
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:33 PM
11

Let me guess, you were cut as a kid, you like your dick, you feel fine, and don’t understand why soooo many people online are calling it genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:20 PM
6

Are you even MRA? 😪
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:12 PM
8

God. There’s women who eat men’s assholes? 😦
/r/MensRights11/12/23 06:37 AM
2

You shouldn’t say “the” patriarchy exists then. You should say patriarchies exist in certain countries or regions but not the West.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/23 03:35 PM
2

In what sense is it real and where is it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/23 02:20 PM
3

Most people aren’t aware of how damaging it is. The fact you even care is good enough for me and makes you better than 90% of folk. Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 10:58 PM
2

You said it blew out “all” jews and muslims out of being MRA. Sir, I’m here to tell you that many jews and muslims are against MGM. Also, the widespread genital mutilation of boys (a form of gender-based violence) is the #1 Men’s Rights issue.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 10:15 PM
32

Bodily autonomy exists for dependent children. It means preserving their choices in life and keeping their future clear and open. Needlessly removing their body parts without their consent when you could’ve delayed doing so until they were old enough to consent, violates their bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 10:22 PM
0

Are you saying all lesbians hate men?
/r/MensRights04/12/23 02:55 AM
7

We can walk and chew gum at the same time, plus we’re light years away from a MGM ban.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 12:04 AM
8

Fuck yeah, man. Between banning genital mutilation and passing divorce reform, it’s no contest which would have a bigger positive impact on men.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:49 PM
6

My dad watched my genital mutilation and then left both my younger brothers intact. He loved me but just didn’t know how excruciating and gory it was.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:46 PM
5

My dad watched my genital mutilation and then left both my younger brothers intact. He loved me but just didn’t know how excruciating and gory it was.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:46 PM
2

No, prepuce amputation is one of several types of MGM depending on how severe it is. (Loss of some or all of frenulum, loss of some or all of inner mucosa, loss of enough overall tissue to restrain erections or not, etc. etc.)
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:44 PM
8

Our dicks are being partially cut off. That’s a legitimate complaint, not “whining.” And it’s happening by the MILLIONS. The number of victims is staggering, which is why so many of us who support men’s rights care about this so much.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:42 PM
1

It’s normal for kids’ genitals to be too tight to retract. You and your parents were tricked. It’s not even an indication for circumcision to begin with. Many men and women can’t fully retract their prepuces; it’s a normal variation that can be changed by slowly tensioning the opening to permanently dilate it over time.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:35 PM
0

Plenty of jews are against male genital mutilation and you’re being antisemitic to suggest otherwise and paint them with a broad brush. Also, kids of Jewish and muslim parents deserve protection, too. It’s antisemitic to imply otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:33 PM
9

You should be reported for misandry. There’s nothing wrong with the natural male body.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:31 PM
6

Widespread sexual mutilation of males is the most important men’s rights issue but unfortunately many circ victims defend their own genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:28 PM
8

Children deserve to be protected even when their parents identify as Jewish. You’re being antisemitic to imply otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:25 PM
5

Sorry to hear about your son. My dad didn’t protect me either. Fell for the same stupid lies.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:24 PM
9

“That piece of skin is literally useless” It’s literally not useless. It’s an integral and important portion of the penis with numerous uses including gliding, lubrication, pleasure, and protection.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 11:22 PM
1

Same but I think trans people need there to be genders.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 08:41 PM
0

Had you been left intact you would have several more functions you couldn’t live without
/r/MensRights12/11/23 02:10 AM
0

@ thoroughly clean. You rinse it off just like any other body part.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 02:00 AM
3

Big problems? What big problems is he having with his normal, healthy body? If the penis or vulva required a special cleaning regimen we’d have gone extinct a million years ago.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:26 PM
2

Oof.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 08:05 PM
3

Who cares about anesthesia if he won’t remember it? /s You’re contradicting yourself.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:35 PM
2

It’s hard to tell how severe your circumcision was. How much gliding mechanism do you have left? How much inner foreskin and frenulum do you have left?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:32 PM
3

Penises that were circumcised are higher maintenance while there’s still an open wound than intact penises that were never wounded. After the wound heals, the maintenance is identical. Also, men in the middle east like themselves a good circumcised pussy. Is that a good reason for a girl in the Middle East to wish she was circumcised?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:30 PM
2

So ignorance is bliss, basically?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:25 PM
2

You should disclose the fact you’re a circumfetishist, or otherwise explain why you’re in the extreme minority of men who chose to amputate some or all of their prepuce. You should also explain what severity you got (low, high, tight, loose, kept all the frenulum, some, or none), etc.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:22 PM
4

I said the average male circumcision is objectively (in terms of meissner’s corpuscles removed) more damaging than the average female circumcision, and I stand by what I said. Infibulation/glans removal is 10% of FGM whereas 90% of boys who were circumcised lose their entire prepuce, which contains the 5 or 6 densest concentrations of nerve endings in the human penis.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 07:06 PM
4

So you taught him about consent by permanently modifying his genitals without his permission? Your arguments boil down to “I’m circumcised and I’m fine”. This is a major consequence of cutting people when they’re a baby and then raising them in a cutting culture that praises them for having incomplete, disfigured, and not-fully functional genitals. Essentially you were raised to think your genitals were complete when it came to the important parts, so now you just feel in your heart that circumc…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 06:15 PM
3

“The gay community” um, they’re not a monolith. But being gay makes it drastically more likely that you resent having your birthright denied to you. Just look at the disparate numbers of gay people in r/circumcisiongrief and r/foreskin_restoration.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 06:02 PM
2

I actually really didn’t know what you were getting at. It’s also not even the top 3. Just off the type of my head, the ridged band, the frenulum, and the mucosa (“inner foreskin”) are all more sensitive than the glans. But if your glans is your big concern, why don’t you think amputating the prepuce causes the glans to desensitize and keritinize over time?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 06:00 PM
3

Your counter arguments are very weak. Hair reduces friction and it makes sense we have it. Vestigial organs are also becoming smaller as the male prepuce is the beefiest prepuce of all primates.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:58 PM
3

It’s not better hygiene-wise unless you want to say pulling all your teeth out would also aid you hygienically. The point of hygiene is to keep your body parts clean/healthy. Amputating them is certainly one way of preventing them from geting diseased or dirty, but it completely misses the point. Also, how come you think people don’t experience pain if they don’t remember it afterwards?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:57 PM
3

What if he’s gay?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:52 PM
3

“Glad I got it before I knew.” Are you legit saying you’re glad you’re ignorant? …
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:51 PM
5

God this is so cringe. I bet you didn’t know there’s 10+ different circumcision “styles” or severities. Which one should mommy and daddy choose for him for the rest of his life? I bet so long as you get to see his glans when you change his diaper, you’re happy. Ughk.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:50 PM
5

These morons ascribe zero benefit to being intact. “Well there’s a -50% reduction to HIV 🤓 in other words 0.01% instead of 0.02%” It’s like, “no you fucking retard, your penile sensation was precious to you, your gliding mechanism was precious to you.”
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:47 PM
5

It’s more painful as a neonate for a number of reasons.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:44 PM
-4

You have the imposed identity of a slave now, congrats.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:44 PM
4

Um, no. The rational thing is to include the 100% complication rate of loss of gliding mechanism and loss of precious penile sensation in the “risks” column which makes those list of benefits look even more like a joke.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:42 PM
2

How old were you? Cuz 100 out of 100 boys are horrified by parts of their penis being amputated. Unless they were lied to / groomed into it by the adults and culture around them.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:40 PM
2

Nice try but that guess was incorrect.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:38 PM
2

It’s the #1 issue facing boys and men.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:37 PM
2

The risks of the surgery are more dangerous than the risks of keeping the protective body part. And by the way, there basically are no medical problems associated with being intact. Maybe 1 in 1 million get BXO or cancer.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:35 PM
3

“My wife hates uncircumcised penises” Is your wife having sex with your son? “The initial cut is painful” So you’re subjecting your innocent baby boy to unnecessary pain? “I’m glad I don’t have the extra cleaning involved” If the human body required a special cleaning regimen, we would’ve all gone extinct a million years ago. You rinse it off like a finger, and do NOT retract it. “It’s nothing like FGM” They’re exactly comparable. The main area where they differ is that the average male circumci…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:32 PM
5

Yeah? And?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:23 PM
5

Their pussies prefer intact as evidenced by a million years of evolution.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:23 PM
3

What if he’s gay?
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:22 PM
3

It’s a pretty low-IQ take to say the loss of the most sensitive parts of your penis never affected you. Ditto for the loss of your integrated mobile skin system. Still, “circumcision” is an umbrella term covering many types and severities of MGM, so it’s possible you received a substantially more merciful cut than the average American. But you still lost your ridged band. How much frenulum did your circumciser leave you with? How much overall shaft skin + outer foreskin + inner foreskin (gliding…
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:21 PM
3

“It doesn’t affect me” is delusional. “I don’t care because I’m sensitive enough” is the most pathetic cope, since it implicitly acknowledges the loss of penile sensation but says it’s still ok. You should start caring. You should be furious.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:16 PM
2

And there basically are none, just like there’s none for girls.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:10 PM
-3

There’s no evidence that the male glans is the most sensitive area of our body or genitals. The densest concentrations of nerve endings are in the male prepuce, not the male glans.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 05:07 PM
6

I honestly don’t think this is true. Men generally look better than women, and it’s because they’re natural and authentic.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 03:01 AM
6

If nerve endings meant to enjoy sex were removed from op‘s penis, why wouldn’t it matter?
/r/MenSupportMen30/09/23 02:36 PM
6

Did they amputate any portion of your prepuce as a neonate? This is a hidden and common reason for sexual dysfunction in men.
/r/MenSupportMen30/09/23 10:53 AM
3

The difference between sexual harassment and flirting is whether she likes you.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 07:13 PM
4

Thou shall not circumcise healthy boys.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 11:45 PM
0

What doesn’t matter?? I don’t understand the logic “they didn’t choose, so it doesn’t matter”. What makes it matter is whether it’s harmful or not, and the effects of it. FGM matters, right? But those kids didn’t get to choose. I’m sorry that genital mutilation matters, that’s why so many people are fighting hard to end it. If it didn’t matter, as you say, then we’d be wasting our time.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 08:16 PM
-3

Huh. What doesn’t it matter? Genital mutilation? I never mentioned size. I like small ones.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:46 AM
6

The prepuce is necessary and important for sexual stimulation the way nature intended it. It’s a massive men’s rights issue that 99% of men whose prepuces were amputated didn’t get to choose, and the natural male body is slandered in western culture.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 07:27 PM
-12

It matters whether it’s 100% or not.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 07:24 PM
-2

Naw, you’re calling him a bad person because he switched genders. Yet you’re a crackhead with room to judge? Ok.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 09:14 PM
-3

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:26 PM
-14

Wdym? You want to call them women still and not be seen as an asshole? Good luck in this day and age.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 07:22 PM
12

I’m sorry it didn’t work out.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 10:33 PM
4

Honestly I am the most extreme MRA out there, but I had a similar reaction as you. I didn’t see in the OP where she really did anything wrong or why OP would use that brief dating experience as a reason to call off dating altogether. Like, he wasted the time and effort on a dinner? …ok… I hooked up with a guy 4 times and on the fifth time told him there really wasn’t a spark. I don’t think that means I used him. Even if he was nice enough to buy me dinner (I was actually the one who bought dinne…
/r/MensRights27/08/23 10:30 PM
-2

Lol @ saying completely random and not just random.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 05:27 AM
2

That woulda been letting her off way too easy. Being released out the window should have started the life sentence in prison in a wheel chair.
/r/PussyPass27/08/23 03:46 AM
7

Had to scroll down way too far for this. I bet one day of their glans rubbing against their underwear would be enough to ban child genital cutting forever.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 09:11 PM
1

Oh, like robinhood pants? Like boys wore in medieval time? I’d have to see some examples but it doesn’t really seem masculine even if you do look good.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:06 PM
2

Sorry, dumb question, but what do you mean by “leggings?”
/r/MensRights17/08/23 04:36 AM
1

That’s sad that there’s women who have literally never loved another male before until they had a son.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 05:21 PM
3

I’d never heard the term gynocentrism until I got into men’s rights, but it’s the perfect term to describe how society cherishes, uplifts, protects, values, empathizes with women more than men. And it’s almost like men do almost everything they do to gain the approval of women.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 03:19 PM
1

You mean overstate? Also what was so good about it? The concept of gynocentrism?
/r/MensRights13/08/23 03:13 PM
1

Taking a sharp stone and sawing off the tip of someone’s penis likely caused more deaths from infection than it saved lives from cancer. In fact the jews had a rule where if three sons died in a row from circumcision that the 4th didn’t have to be cut. More specifically to your argument though, you are again not valuing the foreskin’s massive role in sexual sensation and pleasure. I hate to trot out this intactivist trope, but we could cure breast cancer by preemptively amputating the breast bud…
/r/MensRights30/07/23 08:00 PM
1

No, bro. Penile cancer is so vanishingly rare that its prevalence can’t even be estimated with any accuracy. If cutting off the female prepuce prevented cancer, would you cut off 100,000 girls’ prepuces to prevent 1 from getting cancer? Your value judgment is skewed because you ascribe no benefit to being intact or having a prepuce. Yet we’re born with one for very good reasons.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:22 PM
7

Welcome to the sub. :)
/r/MensRights30/07/23 08:09 AM
17

It had no benefit even back then.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 08:08 AM
5

Damn. She doused him with chemicals that reached 200° F and left him to burn to death.
/r/PussyPass29/07/23 03:40 PM
5

Thank you for highlighting the hypocrisy of feminists when it comes to MGM/FGM. Although your examples aren’t of zero sum, they’re examples of feminists’ zero sum mentality, if that makes sense. The fact they don’t fight for men’s causes and they seek only to benefit themselves is evidence they view the relative power balance as zero-sum when it’s really not.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 01:00 AM
7

Actually we don’t almost always know what we are talking about. There’s wide variation in MGM that fall under the umbrella euphemism “circumcision”. For example the frenulum can be removed completely or mostly spared, the gliding mechanism can be partially or fully removed, and the inner mucosa can be partially or fully removed. A big part of the disagreements over how damaging male circumcision is is due to the wide range of outcomes that all get labeled “circumcision”.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 05:13 AM
2

So you think patriarchy is just a neutral description of who happens to be in charge of major institutions. That’s not what the common definition is. Most people believe patriarchy is the oppression of women. When you endorse the existence of the patriarchy, that’s what you’re endorsing.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 08:10 PM
3

So if it was mainly women CEO’s at corporations, the world would be better somehow? Why does the sex of the person in power matter? Don’t individual institutions have limited spheres of influence? Isn’t it true that women can be leaders if they want to? The word patriarchy implies a lack of female power as a result of bias or prejudice. It’s just not true.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:52 PM
9

He was saying belief in patriarchy sets men’s rights back. He called the belief a stumbling block. It has nothing to do with which terms were used to describe it.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 08:05 PM
8

Men and women have equal rights. Where is the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights08/04/23 08:02 PM
21

Women who don’t get laid are obviously misandrist and that’s why. /s
/r/MensRights19/03/23 05:30 AM
2

I figured. Most of these back-and-forths with people who disagree with emotionally-charged words like rape, mutilation, amputation, etc. are because people born into a cutting culture are conditioned to see value in cutting. The American medical establishment, the tens of millions of guys who were cut as babies who say they’re now fine, the religionists who claim God requires it, and the people who sexually prefer it (these are the people who say it looks better) all contribute to a sense of val…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:10 PM
2

There’s really a lack of words to describe violent sexual assaults against people whom you strapped to a board and then violated while they were immobilized. Ok, you don’t want to call it rape. What would you call it as a shorthand. Edit: (Removed the below tail end of what I wrote after “shorthand”) to communicate all the ideas above and to help someone understand who thinks male circumcision is a benign medical procedure that is necessary, beneficial, and relatively painless?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 06:28 PM
5

If you’re legitimately a victim then it’s healthy to share your story and get support from friends, family, and community. Just don’t keep repeating your story more than a few times lest you trap yourself in victimhood.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:01 PM
3

MGM is so much worse than rape that it’s actually an understatement. Would you say FGM (one of the few and rare forms that are as damaging as male circumcision as practiced in the states) isn’t rape?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 03:31 PM
4

Alright, I could have phrased it better. But tell me how having your glans rub against your clothing all day is more comfortable than having it encapsulated in its warm and protective sheath.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:28 AM
4

it's a sexual violation involving the genitals, and involving penetration, as the foreskin has to be pried open using a blunt object that rips the foreskin off the glans. It's like removing a fingernail from its bed. It's pretty much the exact definition of rape, in so many ways. In fact it makes normal rape look much, MUCH less physically damaging.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:56 AM
5

the discomfort of having a normal functioning penis? Do you have Body Integrity Dysphoria?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:54 AM
9

intact genitals are cleaner than having an open wound.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:52 AM
7

As a circumcised man I'm so glad people are speaking for us. It's wrong to surgically modify someone's penis based on the whims of their parents. Especially such a damaging surgery. If it was a ritual nick like FGM often is, I wouldn't mind what happened to me so much, but they removed my full sleeve of skin.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:51 AM
5

Wrong. It's the skin. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:46 AM
8

Correct. There’s not a single redeeming factor except cultural benefits. Which makes it like a fucking Ponzi scheme. smh.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:54 AM
1

It’s important to tell the truth about the functions that are lost. (Gliding, self-lubrication, protection, sensation, etc.) It’s a fine line between survivor-shaming and educating the public at large, but we gotta tell the truth to elevate the discourse on this topic and ultimately help warn parents.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:51 AM
5

If you’re like 99% of guys, you’d have been normal. Also, to clarify what OP said, forced retraction is a common error parents and doctors alike make on young children. The foreskin is born fused to the glans and forcibly retracting it is painful and can cause skin-tearing and scarring that later necessitates removal of the foreskin (according to them) due to phimosis, because the scar tissue from the forced retraction prevents the skin from being able to pull back.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:48 AM
6

I’m so sorry that male survivors of genital mutilation receive ZERO dignity and support. If I had one selfish wish, it would be that male circumcision be considered inherently harmful.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:41 AM
5

He was referring to the percentage of adult men who were circumcised as children. It’s violent sexual assault, making males more likely to be abused than females, overall.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:37 AM
7

The body remembers what the mind forgets.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:35 AM
1

That dark ring is your scar. Did you consent?
/r/MensRights06/01/23 04:30 AM
1

Is that a good reason to perform a genital modification on a baby? The baby could grow up and wish his penis could retract, glide, self-lubricate, protect itself, stay moist, bunch up outside the vagina and stimulate the clitoris during intercourse, etc. The baby could grow up and resent the fact a natural body part was removed from him that took millions of years to evolve and now he can’t get it back.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:30 AM
0

Human genitals aren’t dirty or out to kill their owners. People just rinse theirs off.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:20 AM
1

It’s not about how much you have left. It’s about how much they took, and why. The foreskin is healthy, functional, erogenous tissue that both males and females are born with (actually all mammals on earth) and which no one should have had the right to amputate from your body without your consent.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:14 AM
1

Well I was thinking of the term “power porn” which has been used to describe the Netflix show House of Cards. Basically you get some type of thrill by vicariously living through their lives, or role playing as them in your mind. The thrill people get from watching other people perform sports is way different than the enjoyment one gets from playing video games or collecting stamps or some other hobby. The only exception is like, watching TV in general or something. But then TV show by TV show, t…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 02:29 AM
1

Caring about sports is actually way more strange than not caring about it, with the exception that people are socialized into it. Since worship is negative to you (and it’s a fair criticism I guess, since worshipping gods is supposedly OK but not worshipping people), how about “male athleticism porn” ?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 02:07 AM
1

Huh? Why are you being so defensive. I didn’t mean it in a bad way. Male heroes are awesome. You don’t think that’s an apt description of the appeal of sports?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 01:47 AM
-4

Male hero worship.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 02:25 PM
2

I’ve never posted on r/MensRights before, but this shit triggered me insanely. It’s from a post on r/CircumcisionGrief, and the person in the screenshot said mostly correct things about the pain of being circumcised and how one can go about dealing with it. But man, wtf is this. Women literally deserve more protection than men?! I’m lowkey shocked someone woke enough about MGM can even believe such crap.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 11:19 PM
2

Indeed we are. Wish the international community would help us somehow.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:12 PM
5

Women produce waaaay more smegma than men. Like WAY more.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:10 PM
3

The foreskin is healthy, functional, and erroneous tissue. Cutting it off someone’s body to reduce their UTI chance is insane.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:07 PM
5

I’m a male who wishes they weren’t. I’m 37. It was my body and should have been my choice.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:05 PM
5

I am. I wish I’d been able to decide for myself. It was my body and should have been my choice.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:02 PM
5

You don’t think partial genital amputations are traumatic to a baby? Do you think babies can be traumatized at all?
/r/MensRights19/12/22 11:58 AM
5

What’s wrong with “giving a shit about International Men’s Day” ? 😑 why would that be “a turn-off to an average man-loving woman” like you? Also it’s pretty damn insulting to suggest our movement is about trying to get women to validate us. It feels like you’re upholding a toxic gender stereotype by shaming men for needing validation. Men are people who need validation just like all people do.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 04:30 PM
3

Jesus Christ. Even the Wikipedia article is telling the truth.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 04:09 PM
2

He didn’t say nothing bad was being said. He said nothing innocuous was being said, in other words it was quite vitriolic. Unless I’m misunderstanding OP.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 03:00 PM
1

My dad watched my genital cutting and then left my younger brothers intact. He was just a fool who got tricked. I’m disappointed obviously. 30 years later I’m still sad because of what my dad and mom did to me. But they’re repentant, call it their deepest regret in life, left my brothers intact. What they did really isn’t forgivable but life goes on.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 05:32 AM
1

You said it should reach out to them most. I’m saying there’s toxic femininity too and I wouldn’t call it a smaller problem than toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 07:25 AM
-2

Agree and love the term “toxic gendered expectations” but disagree that men are trapped by TGE more than women.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 06:09 AM
17

Circumcision is literally never the answer. They could have just slit the opening to allow retraction. Removing the entire sleeve of skin is absurd.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 10:56 AM
2

Thank you for trying to help us.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 09:47 AM
14

Honestly bro he didn’t say, nor did he mean, all women. That’s something you added yourself.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:17 AM
5

This strikes me as a misandrist line of thinking, or at least overlooking the power that men have. If women have the power to give “everything” then men do, too (except obvious biological differences like childbirth).
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:38 PM
12

For a man, to not be needed is to die a slow death.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:08 AM
12

We’re too ashamed to go to the doctor because we’re supposed to be strong and tough and not need care.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 04:49 AM
14

Do it bro, you’d be doing the lord’s work. Real talk tho, for your mental health, maybe you shouldn’t. Wikipedia is a cess pool. The circumcision article is also hopeless.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 08:50 PM
17

There would be no one left in their sub.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 07:33 PM
0

Sorry bro, but no. I intentionally said “helps” for that exact reason. Sorry. But back to the point, is that not an advantage? Based on muslims sewing up the vagina to prove virginity, clearly after millions of years of sexual selection the hymen would serve a purpose, likely attracting a mate?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:48 PM
1

Bro can you tell me which heading refutes my point about the purpose being to help prove virginity? My sister’s hymen broke while horseback riding. I know there are situations other than sex that can cause it to happen. That’s specifically why I said “HELPS”.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:50 AM
1

Didn’t say penetrated, said jizzed in. If she just used her fingers or an object then it wouldn’t be that bad. But everyone has their sexual preferences, they don’t have to be explained or justified.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:35 AM
0

Well that’s a lazy and hostile response that could have been informative.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 12:30 AM
2

???
/r/MensRights25/08/22 09:52 PM
-3

Its existence is to help prove you’re a virgin obv. No one wants a hole some other dude jizzed in.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 08:49 PM
3

The way you clean it is no soap. Soap disrupts the normal pH and makes infection more likely.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 09:57 AM
9

It doesn’t retract on its own until a certain age. Don’t force him to retract it or this can cause micro scarring and ironically make it difficult to retract later in life. Just rinse it off like a finger and let it be.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 09:49 AM
4

thank you for realizing forced circumcision is barbaric. it's the #1 issue affecting boys and men, by far, in the States. I hope you do stay on the sub, and overlook some of the dumb overgeneralizations many of the members here make.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 09:57 AM
1

Assuming for a moment that’s true, what’s your point?
/r/MensRights19/08/22 08:32 PM
1

I like fincels
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:45 AM
1

Not lesbians though. Statistically they have the least amount of sex.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:08 AM
1

As a gay guy, fuck you. Things have changed, for the better for us. And for the record, I’m the staunchest supporter of men’s rights there ever was. Many gay men in fact are.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:07 AM
2

I read all of this but I wish I hadn’t. Women today have more rights than men. For example the right to come home from the hospital intact. It’s not very relevant whether historically men and women had equal social power, because today we know that at best, they do, but at worst they have more power than men.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 10:02 AM
3

Believing in the patriarchy is so fucking low IQ at this point. You may as well be just repeating things you heard others say.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:48 AM
0

Lol @ the alpha in your group being a gay guy. What a bunch of pussies you hang out with. Haha j/k. It’s awesome you talk about guys to them and they’re cool with it.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:45 AM
2

Oh, in that case, I’m bi also.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 09:44 AM
35

Sad. What kind of a shit human being tells someone to be vulnerable and then can’t stomach it when they are.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:47 PM
5

Yeah, that’s not a friendship. But a lot of guys lack the motivation to reciprocate emotional support to another man, or they’re too afraid of how it would be perceived by women and in turn, by other men.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:42 PM
3

If your face is average then they probably at least want a man who adores them, which is why they don’t make the first move. They can’t tell you’re a rich genius with a big dick.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:38 PM
4

You said your friend is straight, but are you gay? I’m gay and often find myself providing tons of emotional support for straight male friends.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:34 PM
1

I’m a gay guy. I honestly thought the only people paranoid about seeming gay are the actual gay guys who are closeted.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:32 PM
0

How come that’s feminism though? You’re saying it causes women to value themselves too highly, or cause unrealistic expectations? I’m not a fan of feminism and not trying to defend it, but couldn’t you also say that guys bang the hottest chicks, etc.?
/r/MensRights02/08/22 02:31 PM
1

Maybe put a comma after the word “permission”, then.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 01:33 AM
-11

In your story, is it the man filming yelling “can I help you?”
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:24 PM
8

There are smart reasons to segregate the sexes. It doesn’t make it sexist. Are male and female restrooms sexist?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 11:21 PM
1

I honestly really want to know the answer, too. To the baby who gets aborted after being showcased for 9 months? Or the woman who makes bank with no consequences? I really want to know what you meant.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 09:25 AM
3

Genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 02:53 AM
2

I’m sorry your experience with women has been so painful.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 02:53 AM
1

That’s what happened in my family too. I was circumcised and my younger brother was left intact.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 05:01 AM
1

When parents disagree, it’s the intact parent who wants it and the cut parent who doesn’t? Doubtful. It’s about 90% the other way around. But I’m open to seeing evidence.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 04:59 AM
4

He was worried about the lifelong impact on his own brain. Making the same mistake twice is actually easier than only making it once, because if you actually learn from it then that means you for sure for sure made a mistake. Sad.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:09 PM
12

Doubt it. Pro-MGM people will blame the doctors and nurses before they blame the shit surgery itself.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:54 AM
10

Just the term “involuntary celibate” should not be a class of people. Sorting men by how sexually successful they are sounds misandrist. If all you know about two men is that they don’t have sex partners but wish they did, you can’t draw any other link between them. We should abandon incel as a category of people.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:19 AM
12

She may be suffocating them and using the alcohol as a cover-up. How many times can you accidentally kill a kid the same way?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:12 AM
14

“No penis no opinion” would be a disaster for male victims of circumcision because it’s usually the cut parent in favor of it when parents disagree. Source: the hidden trauma by Ron Goldman (PhD jew psychologist) Statistic also holds true for FGM. The circumcised women are the most ardent supporters of FGM for similar psychological reasons as what you see in “Adamant Father Syndrome” in the States.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:03 AM
6

I thought incel was slanderous/misandrist. Isn’t it?
/r/MensRights16/07/22 11:00 AM
7

No “legitimate” purpose in reproduction. 😂 well alright buddy, and the clitoris has no legitimate purpose in reproduction either. Can get pregnant and give birth just fine without it. Bonus points, the foreskin (orifice) is the female part of the penis while the clitoris is the male part of the vulva. These structures exist purely for pleasure. You should be pissed that someone amputated your foreskin against your will. But instead you’re just gonna drink the kool-aid.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:49 AM
6

What the actual fuck. I never called it extra. There’s no extra or useless parts of the genitalia. If the foreskin is extra then so is the clitoris. You’re overlooking the function of sexual pleasure.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:02 AM
14

The foreskin is a full sleeve of skin that’s longer than your erect penis. It inverts during sex. The skin between your scar and your glans is what’s left of your inner foreskin. You lost the majority of your penile skin system. The part you feel with. Also you’re conflating the clitoris with the male glans. They are embryonically homologous but not functionally analogous. The function of the foreskin is pleasure and the function of the clitoris is pleasure. You can remove both without affecting…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:23 AM
21

You can still cum? That’s a pretty low bar. Can you edge using your frenulum or ridged band? Does your foreskin stimulate her clitoris and bunch up on the outside? Have you ever googled what the hell a foreskin is and why humans have the beefiest among all primates? Or do you just want to spew nonsense on the internet and get shut down immediately by the international community.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:18 AM
23

Are you American? You sound like someone whose foreskin got cut off when they were a baby. The foreskin is central to sexual feeling.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 07:12 AM
1

Oh ok. Yeah, you’re right and I’m wrong. Genital mutilation of babies = double plus good. And who cares about the facts because the desert tribe you descended from thought it was a good idea.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 07:15 AM
1

How come men need a female judge to get a fair shake?
/r/MensRights09/07/22 01:39 AM
1

I think it’s caused by sexual attraction to a gender. It makes you biased towards individuals of that gender, even when you’re not attracted to them.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 01:15 AM
1

When an airplane crashes with two people and one parachute, that implies someone’s gonna die no matter what. In actuality abortion lets both parents survive the so-called plane crash. Unhelpful analogy honestly, I don’t recommend it.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 10:11 PM
1

Look. Read a fucking book, ok? The foreskin is not some arcane knowledge lost to the annals of time when the great library of Alexandria burned down.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:32 AM
1

The primary issue is that circumcision removes a useful body part central to sexual feeling. Consent wouldn’t matter very much if it were truly beneficial or even just harmless.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 09:27 AM
3

OP has been destroyed by a hundred commenters but yours is my favorite so far. Who can look at that meaty picture and conclude it doesn’t contribute to sexual sensation.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 09:23 AM
1

I pretty much agree with you 100%. Am voting republican because it’s less hypocritical of them to not give a fuck about genital mutilation and men’s rights.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:44 AM
1

Gonna be honest bro, those parachute/airplane analogies were perplexing as hell.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:37 AM
1

This is how the democrats wound up with three new conservative justices.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:33 AM
0

In all fairness, the goal has always been equity, they only thought equality was the way to get there, and they were wrong.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:32 AM
2

The democrats stopped being the party of empathy like 25 years ago. Now they’re the party of LGBTQ rights, civil rights, abortion/contraception, pretty much everything except straight white cis males.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:32 AM
2

What matters is the platform, not what the voters do. Democrats are for women serving in the military. Sadly both parties are too pussified to condemn MGM but Andrew Yang did publicly question circumcision while running for president. First time in history a prez candidate ever did, to my knowledge.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:28 AM
5

I’m circumcised very tight and never used lube. I was so numb after years of exposure that I just kneeded what’s left of my inner foreskin like dough, and the blend of discomfort and pleasure favored the pleasure. It wasn’t until I started restoring that I experienced pleasure without the side component of discomfort, and it was an epiphany. Circumcision ruined all forms of sexual stimulation except PiV or penis in flesh light. And that’s not even considering the amputated nerve endings, the sex…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:19 AM
10

Female genital mutilation
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:14 AM
21

They’re perpetuating an absurd idea that men as a collective have something to apologize for.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:13 AM
1

🤯
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:13 AM
1

Depressing question tbh.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:12 AM
11

Did the study control for the gender of the judge? I think one explanation is that women turn on the tears and men are suckered by it.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:11 AM
48

How about we cry for the 100,000,000 men and boys who died fighting ww2.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:08 AM
6

Do you care about men’s rights? If so then stop talking nonsense about the male body. The penis self-lubricates (unless you’re severely circumcised).
/r/MensRights07/07/22 07:04 AM
1

I’m not sure what you’re talking about. If your “educated opinion” is to circumcise healthy children then your facts are wrong, or you’re a pedophile.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 01:05 AM
2

I don’t hate women, please spare me the feminist bullshit. I offered an example of forced pregnancy and you ignored it. 🙄
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:15 AM
3

Brian Morris. Ugh. If circumcision is so beneficial and harmless why is it always the same 2 or 3 dudes churning it out compared to the entire nom-western world opposing it in unison.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:21 PM
8

Brian Morris is a confirmed circumfetishist. Please google him. He and his work have been debunked scores of times by other researchers.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:19 PM
6

Sexual pleasure isn’t a medically recognized function of the foreskin. In fact medically the foreskin basically has no sexual function at all according to these authors, which is an absurd conclusion, but that’s the current state of medicine in the West today. You’ll have to think for yourself on this one. Amputating the foreskin and then concluding there’s no loss of sexual functioning is the same thing as saying the foreskin contributed nothing to sexual functioning in the first place. In biol…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:16 PM
7

Foreskin amputation destroys a significant portion of a person’s sexual sensory world. A bunch of easily manipulatable questionnaires, and parsing of words by pro-circumcision advocates, is just not compelling enough evidence to cast even the shadow of a doubt on the fine-touch receptor studies and other raw physical data/observations, plus the testimony of scores of men who were cut as adults and reported a negative impact. I know you’d like to say “well there’s studies for it, studies against …
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:02 PM
2

Almost like you live in a cutting culture and use the internet to talk to sane people around the globe. 🤔
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:36 AM
2

If by tip of the penis you meant the ridged band then yes.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:32 AM
10

circumcision is one of those rare times when literally 99% of society is dead wrong. People get punished by the meat grinder when they are babies, and then become adults who can’t tell they’re losing out sexually.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:36 AM
8

It doesn’t matter. Babies can’t even lift their heads. There is no bodily autonomy except as a legal fiction that gets trotted out whenever someone wants to make a point. But that’s besides the point. Strapping a kid to a board and slicing and dicing his dick with a knife is not comparable to getting kicked out of a concert because you refused to wear a mask or voluntarily get vaccinated. Except in some purely academic sense related to human rights which don’t exist. If you want to die on some i…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:18 AM
7

If you just want to tell yourself a comforting story then that’s fine assuming you don’t cut your kids.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:10 AM
16

Vaccines have health benefits that save lives. Circumcision has absolutely no benefits at all. I don’t care whether someone supports abortion or not so long as they’re against involuntary genital cutting. I don’t see why you should sink both causes by bundling them together.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:01 AM
15

1) Adults who voluntarily get circumcised for medical benefits are biased. 2) adults who voluntarily circumcise have made amends with the structures and sensations they will be removing. They understand in the realest terms possible what to expect, and then consent, thus predicting in advance a negligible or minimal impact to sexual enjoyment. 3) circumcision is an umbrella term for many different types and severities of male genital cutting. It’s possible the study participants got to keep thei…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:43 AM
7

You’re right. I’m sorry. I wasn’t very patient. Bottom line is that the owner of the penis should get to decide how it looks and functions.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:19 AM
2

I feel you. At least you sound open-minded and intellectually honest. The more you learn about this shit surgery, the more you detest it.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:18 AM
9

I’m sorry for calling him a loser, it was a bit uncalled for. It’s psychological/emotional self-defense. Simply stating the facts usually doesn’t change someone’s mind until they’re secure enough to allow for the possibility that they have mutilated genitals.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:07 AM
12

“Nothing would change my mind” doesn’t sound like a dude diligently researching.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:00 AM
7

What is this weak shit. Either genital mutilation is wrong or it isn’t.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:51 AM
18

Bro you know those pro-circumcision studies are a product of culture rather than science. 1) You can’t measure the sensitivity of a structure that isn’t there anymore. They strap electrodes to penis parts that both intact and circumcised still have, and then conclude the sensation is comparable. Joke. 2) the sexual satisfaction surveys are methodologically flawed. People born blind say they are perfectly content without the ability to see. Genital mutilation survivors closely identify with their…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:45 AM
47

This is an excellent question that intactivists should ask more often. It helps undermine the way pro-circumcision people formed their beliefs in the first place, which was never based on evidence. It was based on personal feelings, culture/religion, and their own psychological and emotional needs.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:25 AM
16

Forced parenthood is what happens to cows on factory farms. Letting a dude bust a nut in you, getting pregnant, and then not being able to hire a hitman for your fetus, is not forced parenthood. Call it something else.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:02 AM
4

It’s just power-tripping.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:50 AM
4

Not just rape but strapped to a board like a starfish and exquisitely tortured with knives.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:49 AM
-2

Choosing to not be upset isn’t the same thing as learning the truth, and then choosing to not be upset. You’re just burying your head in the sand like an ostrich while simultaneously declaring everything is fine. You would have to take your head out of the sand first to know for sure.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:19 AM
-1

Uh huh. You’re not aware you’re losing out sexually.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:33 AM
4

Oh ok. It sounded like an extremely common refrain among the forcibly circumcised.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:28 AM
9

If you’re not against circumcision then you simply haven’t learned enough about it yet.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:25 AM
13

The severed nerve endings aid in ejaculatory control. Your two-pump chump problem was more likely exacerbated or caused by your genital mutilation than helped by it.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:23 AM
11

Sigh. You’re gonna skip a lifetime of enjoyment so 80 years from now some nurse doesn’t have to rinse your penis off?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:22 AM
7

Gliding, lubrication, sensation, why are these things molehills when they’re your birthright, fashioned from a million years of evolution. Why should someone else get to decide how your penis looks and functions?
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:15 AM
13

Oh just shut the fuck up. Literally everyone cares except somehow the forcibly circumcised, who extremely super-duper don’t care.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:09 AM
6

“We don’t need all that foreskin to protect it.” Jesus Christ this is one of the dumbest takes I’ve seen in a while. Do girls not need their prepuces anymore for the same reason? Literally every factual statement you made was false, so there’s no need to go line by line.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 01:03 AM
13

People who have Jewish parents deserve to be left intact as well.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:57 AM
2

Oof. Comments like this are so cringe, dude. Wake the F up. A useful and important part of your penis was stolen from you.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:56 AM
13

What’s wrong with your loser husband that he would honestly be pro-circumcision.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 12:49 AM
1

Idk, you have millions of people’s bodies being radically altered appearance-wise, and a culture of being exceptionally squeamish about the appearance of such bodies. It’s a pretty good theory. Americans are the only ones who wear speedos and consider simple nudity to be sexual somehow, especially full frontal male nudity.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:36 PM
1

Same bro. Cruel world doesn’t give a fuck about males.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 06:54 AM
1

Probably related to our wide spread genital mutilation somehow. The exposed glans, even through underwear, is extremely sexual but simple nudity is not supposed to display it.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:11 AM
2

😂
/r/MensRights31/05/22 08:44 AM
14

What was so “un-intellectual” about OP’s post? I thought it was great and plenty stimulating. Literally a quarter hundred links sorted by category.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/22 08:15 PM
3

Women compliment each other but they don’t really mean it. It’s just the way they socialize. Males socialize by insulting each other but they also don’t really mean it.
/r/MenSupportMen30/05/22 08:04 PM
1

Sure, all-male groups are “welcoming” of females compared to the other way around, but is it the type of welcoming they really want? If they just wanted to be treated like one of the dudes, good luck. All the males will start competing for her attention and the group dynamics will change. It’s the same for all-female groups. Unless you’re incredibly gay, the females are gonna feel sexually judged. Men and women treat each other differently than their own sex. It’s dumb and pretty low IQ imo but …
/r/MenSupportMen30/05/22 08:02 PM
29

This is what I came to post. Worst advice I’ve ever read.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 08:50 PM
1

Sir, I’d love the link also please, if you don’t mind.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 05:09 PM
1

Benefitting all women and all women only, is guaranteed to disadvantage a large number of men who don’t possess whatever advantages the blanket policy is supposed to be balancing out. In fact there are so many imbalances between men and women in terms of power, we couldn’t hope to possibly account for them all when trying to use public policy to make men and women more equal. It doesn’t have to be a zero sum game on the individual level, but on the macro level it, maybe it is.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 06:48 AM
1

She’s right, men don’t get to be the way they want. Men have to be “right” all the time or they’re shamed by society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/22 03:01 AM
2

Serious question, why isn’t it a zero sum game? Because in theory we could all work together and sacrifice accordingly to make sure both sides remain equal? Is that how blanket policies work that affect only one side in a nation of half a billion people?
/r/MensRights24/05/22 12:33 AM
9

She’s lumping together men who commit murder with men who die by suicide, to try and erase sympathy for suicide victims. Despicable.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 12:23 AM
1

Excuse me? I’m not talking about morbidly obese. But washboard abs at age 36 isn’t even normal, and never has been throughout human history.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:49 PM
2

They endorse a worldview that is hostile to men, especially cis straight white men. They’re not gonna tell the truth if they think it’ll “mislead” the public.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 12:55 PM
2

You might’ve replied to my comment by mistake and meant this for OP
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:01 PM
1

Sure, they want allll inequality to be addressed. But they can only see the inequality that affects them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 10:52 AM
3

What kind of self-hating man would call that number and say he needs help because he might become an offender.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:35 AM
2

I bet her uncle is scared shitless right now.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:19 AM
1

You keep conflating being protectors with being disposable, but I don’t see how this logically follows. Most “protecting” that men do is letting the woman walk on the inside of the sidewalk, giving her your jacket when it’s cold outside, slapping someone at the Emmy’s because they made fun of your wife’s hair. Basically lame shit that is mostly symbolic. When it comes to actually protecting people with life and limb, women do it, too, and it doesn’t make them disposable. Bin Laden’s wife apparen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 09:58 AM
1

Based? Anti-quitting? Sorry I didn’t understand, can you tell me what you meant?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 09:25 AM
1

In my experience women are pretty quick to dislike each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 09:22 AM
4

They probably resent the pressure society puts on them to appear that way.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:14 AM
1

I have a friend (Mormon) who spent 50 years just pleasing everyone else and putting her own preferences and desires in 2nd place. Culture domesticates people differently based on their gender, but everyone is trained to believe they won’t be loved unless they possess certain qualities or act a certain way. For women it’s being pretty, being submissive, not being a bitch, being a good mother, keeping your opinions to yourself, not being willful, etc.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:10 AM
2

You’re basically just saying you hate them, and you think everyone is misinformed compared to you because you’ve been watching the trial on TV. He earned his celebrity and influence by playing Captain Jack and being a kick-ass actor. I think he does a great job, and the fact his movies are watched by kids is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 07:42 AM
9

It took me a long time (years) to realize they don’t really care about equality. They care about improving their own position, and that’s it. It’s basically a zero-sum game where the only advances acceptable are the ones that help women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/22 01:35 AM
17

Same. I’d say “oh, ok.”
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:25 AM
6

The only reason “girls do it better” is acceptable on a shirt is because we all know it’s not true.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:09 AM
2

Relax, dad bods own.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:08 AM
3

I wish all I had to do was put down the fork. SMH.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:08 AM
4

Why does cutting off circulation cause them to get big like that? My feet have big veins.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 01:02 AM
66

You might have caught her off guard and she didn’t have time to process the information you told her.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 12:39 AM
1

You should file a police report. It doesn’t require them to believe you or not. It’s a crime to file a false one, so the default is they will accept it and you’ll have a contemporaneous record of the incident that may help you later. It’s their job to take you seriously and if you are persistent then it also adds to your credibility.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:54 PM
2

Most guys are easily manipulatable by women because they are oblivious to the fact there’s a struggle for power between the sexes that has existed for millennia. It plays out on an evolutionary level with both men and women trying to offload the burden of caring for offspring onto the other. For example, abortion gives mothers the modern ability to abandon their offspring more easily than the father can (actually they can even extort the father now.) Liberal white knights are drunk off of the pr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/22 01:57 PM
3

How is a pin prick worse than the removal of a whole sleeve of densely innervated skin. Male circumcision as it’s performed in the States is literally the maximum amount of damage you can perform while preserving the ability to procreate. Infibulation only accounts for 10% of cases of FGM but virtually all MGM survivors receive radical circumcision. Many like me even had their frenulums removed, but I’m gonna be honest, I think you have no idea what a frenulum is, a ridged band is, or any of thi…
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:47 AM
3

No. The irony is you telling me to google when you yourself clearly never did.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 11:36 AM
3

The average survivor of MGM is significantly more damaged in physical objective terms than the average survivor of FGM.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 02:36 AM
1

He said the foreskin is tiny. I told him not everyone’s is tiny. And I said it pretty damn succinctly and saliently.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:36 AM
0

Can I hear what your actual criticism is?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:32 AM
10

It’s almost like they never truly cared about bodily autonomy to begin with. 🤔
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:19 AM
4

No one condemns mutilated genitals. They condemn the act of mutilating genitals. The people who are unfairly subjected to the surgeries are not the intended target of the condemnation.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:18 AM
2

Best not to pull numbers out of your ass bro, cuz the baby cutters will seize on it and accuse us of being hysterical and misinformed.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:16 AM
0

Excuse me? My comment was quite educational.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 10:14 AM
1

Get a fucking grip. That was a disgusting post and 500 people upvoted it. I have a right to call the people who upvotes that gross after they just literally called me gross.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:10 AM
4

Satan has tricked you. God loves you and would never tell you to hurt yourself or your kids.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:06 AM
0

So you’re knowledgeable enough to be mad at your parents over it, but not knowledgeable enough to regret the choice they took from you. Interesting.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:51 AM
4

You’re just making shit up. They’re both equally as bad. https://www.prindlepost.org/2022/05/bloodstained-men-and-circumcision-protest/
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:40 AM
4

“It has loads of benefits” is not an opinion dude. It’s a false statement.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:39 AM
4

Why would god give you a body part and then tell you to cut it off?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:36 AM
3

Preach it, brother. If she cut you then I’m sorry. My mom cut me, too. The pain is real.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:35 AM
3

The dudes who were circumcised and know the truth about it, are so happy to see this issue gain traction.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:32 AM
2

People tension the opening to expand the scar tissue and skin that’s constricting it. Suffice to say also you could have just slit the opening to allow retraction without any tissue loss.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:29 AM
3

Well don’t just leave us in suspense. What medical condition required a full foreskin amputation?
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:25 AM
3

Maybe yours is tiny. It’s as long as your erect penis, after all.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 08:19 AM
6

30%, huh?
/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:05 PM
1

Why would they say that?
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:40 PM
1

I’m a white American male. :( it hurts man. I’m so ashamed.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:05 PM
8

Literally no one thinks it should be banned for adults.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:04 PM
8

You don’t think babies can be traumatized? There’s an absolute shit ton of research to the contrary. Start with “the hidden trauma” by Ron Goldman, phd psychologist and jew.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:02 PM
7

Most of the nerve endings are in the skin, foo. It’s the surface of the penis and the main part you feel with.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 02:01 PM
4

The body remembers what the mind forgets. I absolutely cannot believe this guy said “I didn’t experience it” simply because he can’t remember it. Lowest IQ take I’ve heard in a long ass time.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 01:59 PM
2

“We never experienced it” ? Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 01:57 PM
10

None of the damage can be undone but you can emulate the gliding mechanism with some accuracy if you expand your foreskin remnant long enough using skin expansion techniques, like when people stretch their ear lobes, but for your dick. There is also powerful evidence from the “restoring” community that dekeratinization can also occur after extended (months or years) period of constant coverage. But yeah, the dartos muscle, the frenulum, the ridged band, the sebaceous glands, the estrogen recepto…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 01:52 PM
2

“Hearing a symphony with parts of the orchestra missing” hit me in the feels. I listen to classical music mostly.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 01:46 PM
6

I got falsely accused of sexual misconduct in high school and actually got expelled. She got her friends to say I touched her breasts in the library, because she got upset at me when I turned down her advances (I’m gay). It pretty much ruined my life for several years, so I feel your pain. I’m glad you at least successfully defended yourself even tho it was a close call.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:07 AM
0

All you posted was scaremongering with the caveat that people should research themselves. Skin expansion is a tried and true phenomenon that has helped tens of thousands of intact and circumcised guys alike, which you might’ve discovered yourself had you researched before posting.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:05 AM
0

You should do your own research before posting.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:33 AM
2

You’re gonna be fine. Try andre’s method, two to five minutes a time of manual methods every time you take a piss. You only need enough tension that the skin’s elasticity tries to snap it back into place but can’t because you’re holding it.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:32 AM
1

There’s literally like 0 potential for “further damage”. Worst case scenario is like a stretch mark while you are still learning how light of a tension you actually need. It’s about consistency and frequency more than intensity.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:31 AM
1

Oh just shut the fuck up. I’m gay and 80% of my friends are gay.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 01:09 AM
1

Sigh. What??
/r/MensRights15/05/22 08:18 AM
2

It’s a weapon as well as a myth.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:24 AM
1

In most cases where parents disagree, it’s usually the circumcised parent who wants it done, and the intact parent who does not. Source: research cited in “The Hidden Trauma” by Ron Goldman. The statistic shown in the book is 90% of the time when they disagree, it’s the father who wants it done, but I think in countries that cut girls, it’s similarly usually the mom who wants it done to the daughter.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 02:19 AM
8

Same. I didn’t even know this was a thing. I wonder if lesbians steal shit from each other when they break up.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:45 AM
1

Turn off the lights in there, it’s bedtime.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:23 AM
1

Well there’s a good reason if I ever heard one.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:18 AM
2

Come on, man. Most guys prefer looking at women by default. The plot of the movie sucks. It’s about a woman pilot who is magically and mysteriously better than all the men when it doesn’t comport with reality and honestly just ruins the movie for its intended audience.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:14 AM
2

Most women want a guard dog. So true.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:08 AM
4

Sickening. Good way also to learn there’s no male “justice as a victim”.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 01:05 AM
19

Women are upholders of the “patriarchy”. When men open up and be vulnerable, they can’t stomach it.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:44 AM
7

People assume women are sexually innocent for some reason, and that their motivations are probably not sexual, or that it wouldn’t matter if it was. Sad.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:36 AM
3

Why do you hate incels? Isn’t that a sexist term?
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:58 PM
9

Gay men have no appetite to sugarcoat things for women or roll out the red carpet. It can seem harsh.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 09:44 PM
14

It’s satire. They made a hateful post against men and OP is drawing attention to it by putting the shoe on the other foot.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:29 PM
22

Yeah, OK. She wants to get help because she realizes she’s hateful and can’t control her actions. But what happened to mothers supposedly loving their kids more than fathers do? Isn’t that a thing? I feel mothers are no more likely to bond to their kids than fathers.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:23 PM
59

Lol @ 500 lesbians upvoting such a sexist post. Gross. “That’s how I found out i was a lesbian. Men either scare me or disgust me.” “Lol same.”
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:07 PM
15

Click the link, foo.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:05 PM
35

Female pedophiles get away with it because women get the benefit of the doubt, and because boys really aren’t allowed to be damaged by sexual assault unless a man did it.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:02 PM
2

There’s a difference between sensitivity and the existence of sensation itself. Portions of your sexual sensory world were destroyed. Meanwhile your boyfriend has 100% of his.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 07:53 PM
2

You pivoted from “I have no sensitivity problems” to “women came back for more.”
/r/MensRights12/05/22 07:49 PM
4

Do you like the fact you had no choice?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:29 AM
7

Lemme guess, you’re circumcised and happy, so now you’re gonna not give a fuck about the reality of genital mutilation. Real classy.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:22 AM
12

???? Kids are getting their penises partially chopped off by the millions. This bill could have protected them but they went out of their way to ensure that it does not.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 03:02 AM
6

Come on, man. This is super cringe. I get where you’re coming from. You’re a dude who was forcibly circumcised and you feel “fine” with it. But sadly the facts just aren’t on your side. You’re linking debunked studies by Brian Morris without looking rationally at what the foreskin is and what it does. It’s healthy and good for you (and it feels amazing).
/r/MensRights10/05/22 02:58 AM
1

Nice answer. The anus has more nerve endings than a circumcised penis so just start getting f’d just to feel something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/21 07:36 AM
-3

You don’t think it’s relevant that victims of MGM run the AAP and WHO? When parents disagree on circumcision, 90% of the time it’s the cut parent who is in favor of it. (Holds true for both MGM and FGM. My source is The Hidden Trauma by PhD psychologist Ron Goldman, who is also a self-described Jew. ) If your argument is there’s no difference between male and female leadership, well that’s pretty dumb. More likely you’re trying to argue that women and men are equally pro-MGM. I don’t think that’…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/21 02:55 AM
2

Yep. They basically act like it’s impossible to hurt that thing unless you cut the glans off. Saw a woman on Facebook post about her freshly circumcised son: “my little man is so brave!! Doctor said he nearly broke out of the restraints LOL” they just view males as indestructible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/21 01:44 AM
6

They ask you to open up and share your feelings, but can’t stomach it when you do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 10:24 PM
5

More like you were too good to be true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 10:19 PM
3

I remember being naive like you are. It’s a wonderful feeling. “I only need to tell them facts about the foreskin in a non-judgmental way, and they’ll stop doing it.” All I can say is, thank you for caring about this subject u/OvertonsWindow. I hope you don’t give up after you tell them the facts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 09:56 PM
1

USA is exceptional in a lot of ways. Besides being the richest nation in the history of the world, most medical advances originate in USA. American medical institutions either endorse RIC or are neutral about it (which with something as blatantly cruel and wasteful as forced circumcision, being neutral is tantamount to endorsing.) I did manage to convince one cutter woman by using the “Europeans don’t do it and they’re fine” argument but she’s an exceptionally stupid person who automatically bel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 09:50 PM
-4

I said maybe. 1) Women are way different leaders in general, way more bleeding heart, e.g. Angela Merkel letting in literally a million immigrant refugees. 2) There is widespread genital mutilation on a mass scale and the vast majority of the victims are male. Since usually the victims themselves, male or female, are the most ardent supporters of the types of genital mutilation they received, I would consider this an indication that all women leaders MIGHT be more effective than circumcised male…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 09:25 PM
-14

Honestly if the UN were run by all women instead of all men, it might be different. The 80% intact men of the world don’t seem to care about the human rights abuses in USA and Israel, but maybe women leaders would.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 10:18 AM
2

The goal is to get parents to stop mutilating, sure. But how? Education by itself doesn’t work because they already know, snd don’t care. People are not that stupid actually. They know it’s genital skin, they know it’s erogenous tissue. They just don’t care. How are we gonna get guys to get upset about this is where I believe the struggle starts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 10:15 AM
14

FORCED genital surgeries are the ultimate form of body-shaming, the ultimate form of gender-based violence. One of the most pressing evils of our time, but victims don’t see it that way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 10:11 AM
8

Right? Battle wounds, it looks so amazing, can’t wait to put my mouth on that scar.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 10:05 AM
2

Alright well I stand corrected. But there is still not one country where non-therapeutic circumcision on minors is completely illegal. There’s always a carve-out for those despicable religions.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 07:36 PM
3

Tell me one country where male circumcision on minors is ILLEGAL except for medical emergency or the parents are religious. There isn’t one.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 05:17 AM
3

I can’t wait for the glorious day when MGM is outlawed somewhere, anywhere.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 07:29 AM
3

I’m guessing your genitals were mutilated by your parents and doctors in their quest to “fix” you and make you someone you’re not. I’m sorry there’s not more intersex awareness, and that people born with a Y chromosome (even non-intersex boys) are subjected to involuntary genital surgeries when they are born, and it’s perfectly legal. I spend a lot of time posting and reading r/circumcisiongrief you could try posting there as well. I’m sorry this happened to you but I’ve met other intersex peopl…
/r/MenSupportMen16/11/21 09:28 PM
1

Jesus I read that as 5 years prison and I thought that was light. Probation?!
/r/PussyPass01/11/21 05:29 PM
65

And she can admit that and feel confident no one will fault her.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:24 AM
66

Lots of people are shocked to find out there are female pedophiles for some reason. I always thought most pedophiles were female, based on magazines like Tiger Beat, the obsession with prepubescent Justin Bieber, and in general because girls sexually mature way earlier than boys.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 02:08 AM
2

Gotta make it clear who the bad guys are.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 08:23 AM
1

The world is an evil place full of ignorant and selfish people.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:45 AM
4

You’re correct. In countries that practice FGM, when parents disagree, it’s almost always the mother and not the father who wants it done.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:39 AM
4

God bless you.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:35 AM
3

God bless you and Godspeed.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:39 AM
15

“I’m cut and I’m happier this way.” Alright well you’re just saying that. Welcome to 2021, it’s time to start googling shit and thinking for yourself.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:33 AM
5

Sigh why should someone else get to decide how much you get??
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:30 AM
7

Adore these people with all my heart.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:28 AM
31

Obviously it’s toxic masculinity
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:09 AM
5

Nah, you could curl yourself into a ball and let everything collapse. Give yourself more credit.
/r/MenSupportMen30/09/21 12:10 AM
2

Congrats. Keep on keeping on.
/r/MenSupportMen29/09/21 09:47 PM
9

Women say they want a man who can show his feelings, open up, be vulnerable. But when he tries to do so, she can’t stomach it. Women are the upholders of toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 07:55 PM
30

Sickening.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 07:50 PM
2

Because the implication is that men should be able to take care of themselves. There is also a public shaming of men who are victims in any way, to the point where reporting male victims is akin to shaming them even further.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:23 PM
4

Thank you so much for taking the time to explain to this guy.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:18 PM
24

Thank you for this.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:11 PM
7

Cannot be delayed *for consent
/r/MensRights17/09/21 09:08 PM
1

If it was that egregious, like if it was a hard slap and then all her friends started laughing at once, I would call the police immediately and file a police report. “I’m at a bar, a woman just assaulted me, she’s wearing blah blah blah, should I try to find out what her name is?” etc. and then ask for the incident report # so you can reference later and follow up. But yeah, just yelling at her loudly to the point where it makes a scene and you appear to be the only aggressor, that’s not a grena…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 05:42 PM
2

He could have called her an ugly bitch and How dare you think you can sexually harass me. And then walk off. But yeah, standing there and berating her in front of a bar full of people and making a scene, that wasn’t gonna end well for him. If he wants to take one for the team then god bless him, but I personally don’t think it changed much. There’s a deeper systemic problem of men not being viewed as being vulnerable to sexual harassment (or vulnerable at all.) Problem is easier to see than the …
/r/MensRights11/09/21 05:18 PM
2

If you think it taught her a lesson or helped some greater good, then alright.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 04:51 PM
8

OP wasn’t asking you to defend him or give him advice. He’s complaining about how the body positivity movement only applies to women.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 04:00 PM
19

Feminism made it a crime for a man to yell at a woman in public. Doesn’t matter if she slapped his ass at a bar. She probably could have reached right in his pants and groped him, it wouldn’t have mattered. As soon as he yelled at her, the police were called and he had a lot of explaining to do. On the other hand, had the genders been reversed, she probably could have punched him right in the face, and if the police were called (not likely, probably everyone would be cheering and clapping for he…
/r/MensRights11/09/21 03:42 PM
4

Genital modifications are okay. What’s not okay is people’s genitals being modified without their consent.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:30 AM
1

Why is it widespread? Why do parents believe it’s in the best interest of their child to have their genitals surgically altered?
/r/MensRights01/08/21 01:54 PM
1

Sorry to hear about your forced circumcision, and how close you came to remaining intact. Heartbreaking and infuriating. That said, I agree with your post in spirit, but there are many more reasons MGM exists in USA than simply women say they prefer it. Women are gonna ultimately prefer whatever form the men come in. The problem is that the men themselves insist they are fine when really they are losing out sexually.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:47 AM
2

You’re correct. In most cases where parents disagree, it’s the cut parent who wants their child cut. This statistic is true the world over, for both MGM and FGM. I’m not saying it’s mostly men’s fault in USA, because there are many, many cultural factors that play into it. But it’s certainly not possible to blame the majority of the problem on women.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:38 AM
3

My dad witnessed mine as well, and like you, he was shocked at how much skin was removed, and the quality of my screams of agony.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:30 AM
2

Thank you for never missing the opportunity to warn others, and thank you for having the courage to witness your first son’s circumcision, and admitting you were wrong.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:29 AM
17

Pleeeaaaase be on Netflix!!!!!
/r/MensRights13/11/17 03:11 AM
1

I give you credit for manning up and being there to watch it happen. Any parent who wants to subject their children to an admittedly unnecessary surgery should have to be there to watch it happen.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 06:32 PM
1

Parents would not have created such a monster, I blame mostly the doctors.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 02:54 PM
13

This is the classic response from someone who doesn't even want to know what the facts are.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 11:28 PM
2

Yes, bro. That's my point exactly. Your parents didn't build the circumcision machine, they are victims of it. There's a multi-billion dollar foreskin industry that cheats people by the millions out of their god-given capacity for sexual joy. It's hard to justify spending much anger on my parents when they are only 5% responsible and this monstrous institution of child genital cutting is 95% possible. edit: responsible*
/r/MensRights23/04/17 11:09 PM
4

I agree with you that the knowledge of what they caused to happen to you is a permanent game changer in terms of your feelings about them. Your circumcision itself is a wound that will never heal, and your parents were there at the scene of the crime, aiding and abetting albeit out of sheer ignorance. But they were there, they should have protected you, and they didn't. In that sense, yeah, the relationship will never be the same. But I think it's more accurate to view your parents as victims as…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 10:54 PM
10

You have every right to be furious, and your anger is justified. If you're like me, and millions of other Americans, no pain relief at all was used during your sexual amputation and maiming, which means they subjected you to the most overwhelming physical pain you are likely to ever experience, whether you can still recall it or not. The question for me has become, do I want my parents to be heartbroken every day of their lives, because they unknowingly broke my own heart? Are they less deservin…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 10:13 PM
1

I never said Amazon shouldn't be allowed to sell it. My only point is that this board game is a great example of how society views female rape as something extremely serious, while male rape is utterly inconsequential or worse, non-existent. In fact I think American society ridicules male victims in many instances and denies them any sort of sympathy whatsoever.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 03:43 AM
2

I agree with OP as well, it's NOT funny to joke about rape, regardless of the gender of the victim. The message behind this board game title seems to be "it's a male prisoner's fault if he gets raped" or "we shouldn't care if males get raped." This is a good post.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:41 AM
1

Well, superstition may not have been the most precise word, maybe myths is a bit better, in the context of doctors and not, for example, mohels.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 01:11 AM
3

Actually, doctors are the ones who are supposed to be educated and not superstitious.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter