TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

KhadgarIsaDreadlord Archive

View 0 posts and 853 comments by KhadgarIsaDreadlord on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Somebody tell this man what a hiring quota is becouse I'm at my wit's end with the unemployed.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 02:24 PM
1

I work in a female-dominated office. Saying that there is need for a quota is like saying that IT needs a quota for hiring men. Nah, it was just the program the company took advantage off and canned it when the negatives started to outweigh the positives. Besides, frameworks like DEI are driven by politics, not the desire for better outcomes for us peasants. Proven by the fact that these hires had the worst employee retention, barely any of them works here anymore. Still they took the place from…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 12:48 PM
7

The company I work for literally had a DEI framework until recently. It's was never a secret. It was plainly stated. X percentage of hirees HAD to be women. Thank god that's gone now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 01:38 AM
-1

Yeah in one position, in one industry. Dismissing other experiences based on that is plain stupid. Chalking up different observations - likely from a range of different fields - to relationship status becouse he happens to be married and doesn't experience discrimination against men in a male-dominated field is ignorant and dismissive at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 01:22 AM
5

I'm all for women taking sick days off for menstrual cramps -which they can mind you- , but not extra pre-planned fully paid vacation days. That's where it becomes bullshit. Menstrual pain works on a case by case basis, it's rougher on some women than others. I'd put that into the same category as a migraine. Some people experience pain that makes it impossible to work, they should be able to get sick leave for that (with the 40% pay cut that comes with any other sick leave, even life saving sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 12:58 AM
4

Not relevant to the conversation. 2-5 years of paid maternal, 3-5 days extra days off anually and earlier retirement are excessive either way. The OP asked what disadvantages do men experience that came as a result of feminism, I awnsered. These are undeniable advantages that women have over men. Since you are only fishing for gotchas instead of arguing in good faith I'm done responding to you. Have a good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:39 PM
7

They get 3-5 more days annually and retire at 60 years old instead of 65.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:51 PM
2

Is the extended parental leave including the healing period for the woman’s body postpartum? Duh, of course it does. If so, doesn’t that make sense because it’s essentially medical leave? No, where I'm from 2 years of paid parental leave is the standard and it can be extended up to 5 years. That's a crazy long period of paid leave, even counting with at least one year of postpartum recovery. Especially with the earlier retirement taken into consideration. If a man was also recovering from a big …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 04:48 PM
-3

I have no issues with you experiencing less disadvantages, honestly I'm happy for you, the less sex-based bias there is the better. My problem with your comment was saying that relationship status plays a definitve role in the perception of these disadvantages. No, you don't have to be intimately involved with someone to be able to tell if they are getting preferential treatment based on their sex or not. Not in a professional, social or academic setting. It's pretty damn obvious when it happens…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 12:19 PM
1

Bad metric, I've been with my girlfriend for 7 years now and that has nothing to do with say career disadvantages that i've mentioned in this thread. Systemic preferential treatment exists independently of individual relationship status.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:02 AM
29

My female coworkers get more days off, longer parental leave, get to retire earlier, enjoy more leanient treatment from superiors, and (some of them) were favored in the hiring process over more qualified male candidates to fulfill a quota. Dare I say, pretty substantial disadvantages.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:22 AM
1

Being overly confrontational. Goes without saying, it's only a matter of time before he starts being needlessly confrontational with you. Pretending to be confrontational while actually being a chickenshit. It's poor performative behavior and it can manifest in much more harmful ways. Hyperfocused on social issues/advocacy/policies that don't directly concern or benefit him. Pretty sel-explanatory, there is always a selfish reason why people put energy into things. It might be that it makes him …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 04:44 PM
7

I assure you that the women in here are just as maladjusted social inepts as the men are. Have you seen the shit they are typing up? One group of wackos can't get laid becouse they are wackos and are coping about it. The other can't keep anyone sticking around becouse their insanity makes men run for the hills after hitting it. In the end of the day they are all just wackjobs and nothing they say should be taken as more than light entertainment. Like when you are watching chimps piss at each oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 02:54 PM
1

There is nothing "moral" about saying that game matters. It's still a metric of attractiveness just like looks are. The reason a lot of unsuccessful men don't like to hear that is becouse unlike physical features, behavior and social ability are 100% in your controll and failing them is an individual shortcoming which they don't want to recognize. And no, that doesn't mean that a deformed person could pick up everyone if they are charismatic enough - appearance is still important - it means they…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 06:39 PM
1

Depends on the woman. If you pursue someone who isn't nerdy at all then it can be but most of them will accept it as long as your nerdy hobbies aren't excessive. Then there are nerdy women who will see it as a perk. No defibitive awnser there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:45 AM
1

Thats not what I said. Did he tell her he only wanted her for sex? Refer back to my awnser and think it through as many times you you need. Did he tell he wanted a poly relationship? See, this might be your problem. That's a lot of questions regarding him and none regarding her. So as long as you keep replying in a clearly biased dishonest way, I can only hold up a mirror to you. Did she tell him that she's going to get bored of sex? Did she tell him that she's going to redefine the conditions o…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:23 PM
1

Did he tell that he only wanted her for sex? So you acknowladge that sex a is a reasonably expected part of relationships among other things. Cool. Otherwise that question would be really stupid and unsensical. Like "Did she tell him that she only wanted him for loyality?", no but 99% of people would agree that it's pretty damn important lmao Anyways, if sex is not important then why does cheating bother you? The guy you’re talking about clearly doesn’t believe that and neither do most guys here…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:46 PM
1

Men don't expect to meet them in the middle though. Thank you spokeswoman for all men, really appreciate it. They just get angry and annoyed if you deny them sex. Reasonable to some extent. Put yourself in men's shoes, you center your life around a woman, toll your life away for your shared future and the person you do that for doesn't even bother to make you feel desired. Honestly this is what all the women I discussed this with fail to understand. Sex (more accurately displays of sexual desire…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:36 PM
1

Exactly and Imo that's the right choice. There is no point in forcing something that was never going to get better. If you don't have the desire to sleep with your husband then why should he bother staying with you as a roomie? Nah, you go your separate ways. You can live a sexless life to your heart's content and he gets to have all the sex he wants. It's a win-win. But when men do that, posts like the this are created shifting responsibility to them alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:04 PM
1

No one told women that they get to expect exclusivity while also neglecting their partner yet here we are. Obviously there are important things besides sex, but sex is important aswell. When a guy marries a woman he signs up for exclusivity, not celibacy. That comes with certain expectations, you should be willing to make compromises that keeps your partner happy. Not saying that you should spread your legs every time your husband tells you to, but you should at least try figuring something out …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 12:34 PM
5

I'm not a believer but may God protect her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:28 PM
7

I like that you straight up refuse to engage with my argument. Great quality to have on a debate sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:25 PM
8

Ask 100 men if they want kids and 80 of them will say yes. Ask 100 men if they want to raise someone else's kid and maybe 5 of them will reluctantly volunteer. It's not about whether they like kids or not. Besides, you are wrong. If you like kids you should stay clear of single parents even more so becouse you are more likely to grow attached to the kid so if a breakup happens, it's gonna suck extra hard. Like imagine raising someone for years like your own and suddenly boom you can't see them a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:37 PM
5

It seems to be a mutally beneficial agreement betwen you and women that you stay away from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:18 PM
3

No way, not even if his husband was a brother-in-arms. It's not worth when it's a stranger and straight up weird as fuck if you knew the guy. Sure if you were close friends with the husband chip in, give them your contact, help them out but there is something deeply disturbing in fucking your dead friend's grieving widow. Problem is, many people think that men don't want to date single moms as some sort of punishment. The real reason is that most men simply don't want to live with and raise the …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:12 PM
1

Yeah and women poking holes in condoms didn't became a stereotype out of thin air. Especially with the amount of people in mind who think a kid is a magic bandaid for a failing relationship. Regardless, reproductive rights are relevant once contraception has already failed and they are based on autonomy, not "who's at fault". If these things were weighed in, that wouldn't be favorable for women considring they have 10x contraception methods compared to men ( condoms, the pill, copper IUD, homona…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 10:48 AM
-2

You forget about one thing: preventing pregnancy in the first place is much more reliable as a woman and their contraception methods are a lot harder to tamper with. In theory a woman could poke holes in a guy's condoms and still be entilted to get him on the hook. Besides, I think women having to suffer through pregnancy is an emotionally driven argument against paper abortions. It doesn't actually have anything to do with the moral dilema becouse no matter how much pregnancy sucks, ultimately …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/26 12:06 AM
-2

The simple fact is that some men have 0 options, so a guy having more than 0 options proves women rate him positively in some sense. Nobody has 0 options, there is no place where someone won't go to. Sure, your options might be heavily limited making it hard to find them, but they are there. A relationships-only lifestyle is too big of a risk in a world where most women have hooked up at least once. The guy has to prove he's desirable enough for hookups too first, and thus not automatically outr…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:10 PM
2

I mean ofc it is, men are naturally the proactive party in courting which means that it will take a lot of trial and error until you hit on the exact kind of women who vibe with you. Women are reactive, they get hit on by all kinds of men and go with the ones they vibe with. It really isn't rocket science, a lot of men just have a problem with the "being proactive" part. Some approaches to courting are also more succesful than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:48 AM
1

Sure, they aren't. They are also not obligated to be in a relationship that comes with the expectation of compromises and a mutually satisfactory sex life. Also, people are not obligated to stay in a relationship with someone who is selfish in bed. There are no obligations here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 09:04 PM
1

Oh I agree completely, this is what I was trying to say by "within reason". You can't expect people to literally hurt themselves for your sexual gratification. Same with exhibitionism, swinging, threesomes, polyamory, these are automatically outside of the boundries of a monogamous relationship and should never be expected out of anyone who signed up for monogamy. But yeah things like feet, roleplaying, femdom, prostate stuff, etc. are really mild enough where I'd say you won't die if you indulg…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 05:33 PM
1

Yeah exactly, it's absolutely valid to have both wants and wonts. The problem is the absolute lack of wills. Compromises are important in relationships, even when it comes to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 05:15 PM
-1

It's highly unlikely that you will find someone with mutual attraction, shared goals, good chemistry, capable of upkeeping a healthy dynamic, good financial literacy, preferable background...and also into the exact same kinks that you are. That's a unicorn right there, and almost no relationship in the real world fits all those things, some of them are going to have to give and fetishes are at the bottom of the totem pole. Example: foot fetish. One of the most common feitishes among men and one …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 12:39 PM
1

The dynamic just works better for some people. Let me paint you a picture: Both you and your partner just got home from work. It's 6PM, most of the shops have closed up, the fridge is empty, you only have a hour or so to do a grocery run. You go and do that, grap everything you need. Then you realize that the morning mess needs to be cleaned up, you need to cook dinner, eat and wash the dishes. If you distributed tasks evenly and did them relatively fast then lets say you got them done by 8 PM. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 10:29 AM
3

"Yeah Jr. so we are going out with your father, we left you 50 bucks on the counter, get yourself a pizza when you are hungry. See ya next week, bucko" While Jr. in question is 2 and half as tall as the counter.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 04:33 PM
1

Yup, another in the long line of reasons why I don't care for having kids. "Hey would you like if everything in your life just perpetually sucked (except your wife)?" No, I wouldn't. You have fun tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 04:24 PM
8

That's funny coming from a woman. As a guy all those things apply just swap the 20% orgasm rate to a pillow princess laying there like a sentient fleshlight.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 08:08 AM
1

Yep, I've been with my girlfriend for 7 years, lived together for 4. Planning to propose in the next 3 years, possibly on our 10 year anniversary.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 11:02 AM
0

Wife material is a woman who is willing to make compromises for the sake of the relationship, sticks by you even at your lowest point, and works towards your shared long term future. On top of that, it's a woman who's wishes align with yours (think of stuff like kids, shared finances etc.) Of course not unconditionally, you have to do the same and respect the boundries of the relationship aswell. Why women should strive to be wife material? Becouse it increases their chances of becoming a wife l…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 10:40 AM
1

Your question starts off on the wrong foot by setting a false premise. That's what I was trying to get across to you. A sense of self-worth is complex and you can have much of it in some areas and none in others. The part you get from sexual validation can't really be compensated by anything and god know people try their hardest to do so. Feeling desired is a basic psychological need and the lack of it will bother even the most successful person on earth. Just wanted to clarify my awnser, I hope…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 05:57 PM
1

There is no substitute for sexual/romantic validation. You can be statisfied with yourself, accumulate plenty of things to be proud off, make good money, treat yourself, have a healthy social life but that won't make you feel sexually desired. Likewise you can be sexually validated but that won't make you feel better about things that you are lacking outside of that. Let's say you are broke and uneployed, you will still feel like shit about that even if you manage to have sex regularly or have a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 10:06 AM
0

I agree that relationships are more likely to be built on genuine desire nowadays But here is the problem: Some people do want a provider/stay-at-home dynamic and economically that's no longer possible for most people. Some women want to just marry a dude that's willing to take care of her for life. Some men want to provide for someone in exhange for companionship. People who want these things feel pushed out by current dating trends, patricularly men becouse only the most wealthy of them can af…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 02:54 PM
19

At 14 I was teaching a 40 something married dude on TeamSpeak about how to optimize damage on an Echancement Shaman for raiding in WoW. The same dude was present on our guild meet-up which was an asortment of guys of all ages ranging from 15 to 55. I met one of my best friends there who was closing in on 30 at the time for the first time in person. Women can't comprehend the idea of guys being dudes. They patronize/infantilize everyone younger than them and just assume that everyone does that. G…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 07:24 AM
4

90% of people under 30 will be single it will be expected from men to include their annual income in their dating profiles women will be able to read reviews of men in their dating profile, obviously without verfying the reviewers. it will be mostly expected for men to visit prostitutes, likewise a lot more women will casually engage in sex work. Talking with female coworkers about your private life will be a huge no-no for men. Possibly even a reportable offense. AI companions will be completel…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 09:15 PM
3

The worst of feminism is literally castrating men as children and segregating them to colonies where they would live like animals and should "earn" the right to make it to society. It goes waaay beyond taking away the right to vote my guy. So nah, disagreed. I'd rather live in a world formed to the vision of the most depraved redpiller than one to your average feminist author's. Read up on your heroes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 02:27 AM
–

Cool, not what I'm talking about. As I said my opinion is that we can affort the luxury to not force kids on anyone. This is ideal, I prefer it this way. I adressed the argument that women don't owe it to society to bear children. Which is only true until it isn't. It is a privilege, just like it is a privilege for men that they don't have to go and die in a war at 18. The reality is, when push comes to shove the needs of the many will overrule the wants of the few, that's rule #1 of communal li…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 07:03 PM
–

Very very controversial topic when taken to the extreme. On a ground level, I agree that nobody (not just women btw) should be forced to have kids that they don't want to have. But Where is the point where upkeeping civilization becomes a higher priority than your individual desire to not want kids? When the awnser to "I don't owe it to society to have kids" becomes "yes, you do if you want to eat" or "I wasn't asking"? It's got to be somewhere, is it's just the matter of where.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 03:39 PM
–

An thank fucking god for that this isn't the norm. There is enough venom in the average PPD commenter to put down an adult elephant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 09:56 PM
2

As much as it pains me to admit, yes men do shit test each other as a form of social bonding. Rarely their partners tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:37 AM
1

Shit testing is purposefully creating a stressful situation for no other reason than to see how the other person would act if a similar situation would actually come up. The point of it is to evaluate people. The reason you can't see patterns is becouse it can be literally anything. Some popular shit tests: asking a friend to start flirting with your partner - or creating a fake profile and doing it yourself - to see if they would go along with it. Purposefully creating arguments to see how they…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 07:35 AM
1

No clue what that is but whatever helps you sleep at night
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:33 PM
1

Whenever men say that she should have choose better, that's usually the response to a sexist generalization. Example: "I'm so fucking tired of men, they - insert thing that their ex did, who they specifically choose to date - "
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 04:40 PM
0

Apply it to anyone else, suddently it's ignorance and bigotry lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 12:27 PM
1

You are criticizing age gap relationships based on your anecdotal exoerience of being in one. It's no different from saying relationships are categorically bad becouse you were in a toxic relationship in the past. Sure, do whatever you want. But if you don't want any pushback maybe don't do it on a debate sub lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 06:50 AM
1

Have you been with all of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 06:43 AM
-3

With the same guy? Damn he must be popular
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:11 PM
-3

Unless you had an experience with the specific man you are criticizing, you are not applying learned experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 06:09 PM
1

Unless you had experiences with the specific man in question, basing your criticism on your anecdotes is really stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:25 PM
1

You didn't ruin any magic. Animals aren't comparable and using them only weakens your argument. Gaslighting doesn't work in a written form and your continous dishonesty and shifting of the goalpost does more for my arguments than yours. I'll tell you what I think you are doing. You made up in your head that men are at fault for a commonly occuring natural phenomenon, that also existed for humans since the dawn of time and when you are told that it's ignorant, you just deflect. Honestly I have no…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:28 AM
1

How in the world does prostitution predate humanity? Prostitution has been an observed behavior with over 200 species. It's called the oldest profession for a reason. Yes even monkeys bartel sex for food, koalas rape and dolphins masturbate with decapitated fish carcasses. Sorry for ruining the magic. I told you this to hammer in how deeply rooted prostitution is, there is no abolishing sex work. It's as absurd as trying to abolish murder. Extremely naive and impossible ambition. And yet that di…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 12:07 AM
1

OF promotion is not pushed as ragebait
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 11:36 PM
0

No. Then you are not punishing everyone who creates the demand. I'm more of a "abolish sex work" advocate. Many tried, all failed. Prostitution predates humanity, and it will be here long after we are gone. If you think there is a one and done solution then you have a very surface level understanding of the topic. I think men should have consequences for creating and using prostitution. There are, men who visit whores are seen as pathetic losers. Besides, men can't create prostitution. They can'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 09:47 PM
1

I never claimed that you do. Just chipped in to explain why you don't see Onlyfans promotions despite a lot of men complaining about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 09:37 PM
0

So sex workers aswell? Cool at least you are consisten ig. I'm more of a legal prostitution advocate. I think people should be allowed to have consensual sex on whatever terms they want, including the exchange of sexual services for money. But some of those terms will and should have social stigma around them, on both ends. Prostitution has consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:59 PM
3

This egalitarian feminist primitive reptilian male gaze. The jokes write themselves at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 12:23 PM
0

There is demand for everything all the time. Including CSAM, illegal drugs, human trafficing, hitmen, torture porm, revenge porn etc. And existing demand for something doesn't validate supplying said demand and certainly doesn't absolve the supplier of criticism, ostracization or imprisionment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 12:22 PM
4

Not only that, you are a woman. The algorithm won't throw stuff like that your way naturally unless you actively seek it out. Men get recommended it everywhere, becouse men are the most likely demographic to engage with that content. It took a day to unfuck my algorithm in platforms like IG reels and some OF promotion will still show up time to time despite tapping "not interested" every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 11:31 AM
1

No, we are outside of the realm of prostitution. She said that she wished more women would demand financial compensation instead of providing free sex to men. That is exclusively dates, hookups and relationships. My question also wasn't what the guy in that situation should do rather than expecting a date to put out. Again, I asked if the same principle that she established would be viewed as acceptable the other way around, obviously it wouldn't. Why did I do that? To demonstrate how disgusting…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:36 AM
1

Maybe the men you choose to sleep with 💁‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:18 AM
2

It goes to show that all women are inherently sex workers in reality. A prostitute everyone sells drugs A drug dealer Everyone steals A thief Maybe it's just your midset that's problematic. You view sex as something that happen to women and disproportionately benefits men - not a mutually enjoyed experience - , therefore you apply a transactional attitude to it. That's not how normal people view relationships, but that's a you problem to figure out. My point wasn't about how men should be entilt…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:14 AM
1

Since there seems to be a lack of reading comprehension I'll paint you the picture of what the lady of the night above described. She said that it pains her that some women don't expect payment for blessing a man's life with the privilage of fucking them. I asked that would it be proportionate if a man expected a woman he financially provided for to put out. Let's apply this to a real life situation: Let's say a man and a woman are on a date. Do you think it's reasonable if the deciding factor w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 10:58 PM
1

Yeah no shit, that line has been blurred by the prostitute I'm replying to. Awnser the question. On principle what makes expecting financial compensation for intimacy better than expecting intimacy in exchange for financial compensation? We both know the awnser, your ideology just won't let you say it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 04:52 PM
3

Not a comparison. I reframed your principle to show you why it's nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 01:04 PM
0

makes me angry when men take advantage of a woman's time and essence. You do realize that it costs the guy's time aswell right? As well as whatever the fuck you mean by "essence". I hate women who don't get money for what they offer to men and then move on with their day. Surely you think the same when we reverse the situation and the woman doesn't want to put out for the man who is providing for her financially, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:41 PM
1

Some people also want to consume CSAM, must somebody provide them with it and be paid for their labor? I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:33 PM
1

Not to mention that sex work in particular will always exist, so it’s much better to have sex workers go through proper legal channels so they can get paid appropriately/receive benefits/not feel like they’re constantly at risk of the government ruining their lives. I agree but as someone living in a country with legal prostitution I have some thoughts. The overwhelming majority of prostitues still work illegally despite having the legal option available. Why? Tax evasion. Turns out prostitution…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:31 PM
1

It doesn't matter if they "should" exist or not. They exist, they always have existed and always will exist as long as humans walk the earth. Regulating these industries is the way where their existence causes the least amount of societal damage. If all of these things would be criminalized by tomorrow, the floodgates would open in the black market and a lot more people would get hurt and even die.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 12:15 PM
8

That guy just avoided getting his mental health destroyed, good for him.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 07:34 AM
3

over 40 years of life Explains a lot. The one never came, did he?
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 05:35 PM
21

It is a terrible idea. Being raised by parents who were unfit to have kids is a massive reason behind why a lot of people lack the desire to have kids. I can't look at a family in public without thinking that they are in what would be my personal hell.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 07:15 PM
2

All of them done by hogs.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 11:20 AM
2

He wasn't the one either, hun?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 07:10 PM
3

When misandry goes so far it circles back to straight up misogyny lmao
/r/EverydayMisandry18/02/26 01:53 AM
19

Everyone who poached victims for Epstein was a woman.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/26 11:26 AM
3

Criticizing the casino does not equal defending the gambling addict. Both people that give in to life-ruining addiction and businesses that make a living off them suck. This post is about the business and people perpetuating it, there are plenty of others that address the addicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 09:03 PM
8

Becouse it's a given. Men's responsibility is not controversal, everyone would unanimously agree that that they were the ones making the final decision to opt in. That doesn't change the fact that OF is scummy, exploitative and predatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:06 PM
8

Two things can be true at the same time. It's fair to blame both the methead and the meth dealer who got them hooked in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 02:29 PM
1

Onlyfans itself is pimping incorporated. The models are not comparable to porn actresses, they are comparable to prostitutes. Onlyfans is also preying on some of the most vulnerable among us - people who feel socially isolated, people prone to addiction, people with little sense of self-worth - by playing into unhealthy parasocial dynamics. It's inherently exploitative and immoral. Even if you don't give a fuck about the customer, the platform is still exploitative to the models and encourages t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 02:08 PM
0

Fucking the hotest prostitute on the market doesn't even compare to pulling a just a mid looking woman for a ONS. Sexual acts are inherently better when the other person has genuine desire for you. When you are pulling anyone there is a sense of satisfaction that prostitution can never replicate. That the other person wants to sleep with you for your qualities as a man, becouse they are attracted to you. I would feel like a loser and honestly less of a man if I had to relly on prostitution. If u…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:57 AM
8

holy projection. I'm bi with a number of bi, gay and lesbian friends. I'm the last person who has a problem with someone having same-sex attraction. You are the one who seems to take offense in the existence of straight people lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:30 PM
6

Ok and? People are free to express their sexuality however they want. Goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:25 PM
7

Sexual orientation is not about solidarity, it's only about attraction. You can be the most homophobic piece of shit in the world or the fruities doll in the pride parade, if you have a desire to have sex with members of the male sex as a male, you are either bi or gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:21 PM
7

More like confirming to the heteronormative cultural standard which says that a man is only succesful and achieved if he has a wife and kids. Sacrificing desire for normalcy has been a problem for hundreds of years. Repressed or not, if they want to fuck males then they are at least bi.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:13 PM
5

Your partner is part of your intimate life, if they participate or have participated in something you find sexually repulsive then that can change your attraction to your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:07 PM
3

I wouldn't call it homophobia. You can 100% accept and support gay people without wanting them in your intimate life. Sex betwen gay men is as repulsive for straight people as straight sex is for gay men. I can absolutely see someone growing disinterested in their partner after an act they view as repulsive. Is it fair? No but it is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:21 PM
8

"Straight" in this case is extremely gay in denial. Straight people are not interested in their own sex, categorically.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 12:15 PM
–

I agree that people can put the bar as high as they want. What they can't do without getting clowned on is be vocal / demanding about those expectations and to complain when they get no attention from people who are within those expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 03:11 PM
1

It will do well for your mental health if you just assume that every influencer who ties themselves to an ideology / value is grifting. People in general hardly settle for ideologies that their lifestyle is incompatible with or even causes any level of inconvinience. That's the reason so many of them don't practice what they preach once their means grow out of that box.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:06 AM
–

Not everyone should have kids, some people are simply not compatible with the lifestyle that comes with being a parent. The more accepting we as a society are with this fact, the less of these cases will happen. Some people are only fit for brainless hedonism until the day they die and that's ok. There is no use in trying to preassure these people into family dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 10:59 AM
1

you do realise that if this is true then men cannot be raped by women in ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM, right? Holy shit that's the most out of touch thing I've read today. You do realize that women sit on dudes who are blackout drunk, drugged or passed out right? Other than those exteme cases by far the most common form of rape commited by women on men is rape by deception through stealthing, poking holes in condoms, "forgeting" to take contraceptives and all that. Do you genuinely think that coercing …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 01:08 AM
2

Both exist but it's a very circular debate, the line is blurred on what is legitimately denial of misogyny and what is a reasonable counter argument that a given instance is not the result of misogyny. Example: I've been called a misogynist for explaining why so few rapists get convicted. I don't want to get into it here but the main conclusion was that. The overwhelming majority of cases go unreported, an estimated 70% It's a crime that is extremely hard to prove and it has a high standard of e…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 03:00 PM
1

Throwing in abortion in there is wild since that requires a surgery or a miscarriage. Neither sounds fun to experience so a woman having sex might have to get an abortion which is a risk she takes that he doesn’t Didn't say it was a fun experience, I said it's an option that men don't have. Which it is. Okay then don’t have sex. Lol this is about women delaying sex and you’re bringing this up? If men are concerned they should delay sex as well so they get to know who they are having sex with. Ok…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 03:15 PM
2

Not buying this one or the idea that men would suffer disproportionate psychological damage. There’s a surprising number of pornstars who start out straight and end up doing gay for pay. And a I have a good friend who is straight but hustled chicken hawks at age 14. And my half-brother did g4p too. Result? Completely brain broken drug addict who posts conspiracy theories on facebook. I'm not saying that this is what happens in every case but having to perform sexual acts outside of your sexual o…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 10:30 AM
1

Yeah becouse being a painter has professional standards, pretty high ones too. Here are the professional requirements for prostitution: Have a vagina (optional)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 06:02 PM
1

I don't need to, I lived with one. It doesn't matter if you are a generic prostitute, a dominatrix, a sugar baby, an online model etc. At the very foundation you are just selling sexual acts for money, and everyone can perform sexual acts. No matter how much you try to legitimize this profession, it will never be respected.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 05:44 PM
1

People say many things. It easy to have principles that are never challanged.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 04:28 PM
1

I can see that in a risk assesment perspective. No chance of pregnancy and a lot less chance for STDs and infections with non-penetrative sex. The chance for a violent encounter also drops from negligeble to zero. But yeah, there is no market for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:34 PM
2

It's fascinating that so many men can only fathom how unattractive sex work is to many women when they compare it to paid gay sex. If it was conparable then you'd see as many male prostitutes as you do female ones. Then again, as I said the market is not there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 11:54 AM
1

No, the lack of male prostitutes in comparison to female ones makes this an economical fact. Male sexuality is cheap as dirt.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 10:04 AM
4

Yeah, becouse those aren't inherent values to a person. They are skills that require years to learn and hone. There is nothing to be proud of when you are a sex worker. You are not wanted for your skills and ability. You are a piece of meat with a hole on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 10:01 AM
1

Nah, if it was as viable as it is for women then you would see just as many male prostitutes. The fact that you don't is proof of it not being a viable career choice for most men. It's a general rule that if there is money to be made then there will be people willing to do it. Yet you see female prostitutes outnumbering male ones 100 to 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 09:54 AM
1

Okay, that doesn't change the fact that the main factor that creates a market for prostitution is the lack of access to sex. Think of it like this: if the male clientele of female prostitutes could consistently pull ugly women, they wouldn't pay for sex. Some would, for specialized services, but just sex for money wouldn't be a viable profession. If male prostitution was just as viable then you would see a LOT more male prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 09:42 AM
1

sex is risky for women Is it? With like 10 different ways of contraception and abortions accessible? When you are a man, you have a condom. If that fails you are at the mercy of the woman you just knocked up. If anything it's more risky for men. It has nothing to do with risk, it's biological programing. Men are the courters, women are the choosers. Prostitution is just a way for men to bypass the courting proces and for women to monetize it Also men can and do have sex for money also but I neve…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 09:35 AM
3

Average men are accessible for free on Grindr.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 10:20 PM
4

Let's not be dishonest here. You know that the overwhelming majority can't. There is a small to non-existent market for male prostitution for women. Same goes for gay men, unless you look like a literal model there will be no clients since hooking up with an average gay dude is like 5 seconds on grindr. If you are an average looking woman, who has all her teeth and can perform at a hookup level then congratulations, that raises you above the bottom 90% of sex workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 10:06 PM
10

I'd like to believe that it's becouse they value their intimacy and dignity higher than to sell it out but you do you ig.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 09:55 PM
8

Nah, unless you are 8/10 then not in a million years. Your average gay man can arrange a hookup in 5 seconds on Grindr for free. The market is peetty much non-existent.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 09:53 PM
5

You don't have to be a career prostitute for it to be a privilage. What makes it a privilege is the option itself, that whenever you are in a financial thight spot and have no way out, you can always just arange an appointment to fuck a dude for cash that get's you through the month. Most women can do that, almost no man can do that. Therefore it's a privilege. And yes it's soul crushing and all that. You know what else is soul crushing? Starvation, homelessness, having an illness you can't affo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 09:50 PM
49

Okay as someone who lives in a country with legalized prostitution let me debunk some of your misconceptions. If you are an average looking caucasian woman, who can perform hookup level sexual acts then you are already above the bottom 90% of prostitutes. You will have customers on waiting list, it's a given. Most prostitutes are not pretty or average looking, even. They are ugly as sin. You wastly overestimate the number and amount of expenses that come with the job while disregarding the thing…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 09:33 PM
3

And what are those statistics based on? Like sorry but it's really tiresome when women, who - no offense but - don't know jack shit about male friendships try to argue this without any insight. Men are not more lonely than women becouse we lack meaningful male friendships, we do have them. Men feel lonely becouse there are areas that platonic relationships can't cover. Men also don't have 10 courters lined up at all times to take care of those areas when loneliness kicks in. How out of touch can…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:18 AM
11

I used to have a mostly female friend group, I had no desire to be with any of them and I'm no longer friends with them for a reason. I can say with confidence that (some) women suck even on the platonic level, not just in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 10:10 AM
1

It's not that deep bro. TRP doesn't like single moms becouse they don't want to be settled for or raise someone else's kid. What a child is whithin the context of dating a single mother is the living embodiment of baggage from a previous relationship. One that will take a higher priority for her than you at all times. Most men can handle that when it comes to their own children, but not when it's someone else's. Yes, that duality of being a mother and navigating the relationship is there, but if…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 10:43 AM
2

I'm not inventing the wheel by saying that getting to know each other is very important. A common mistake is when people attach to early, I'm not a huge fan of early intimacy. Fondness and trust should build up over time, it usually results in better and more stable relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 08:14 PM
7

Vetting is something that you should be doing. That said you can do that in a reasonable way, if you start demanding shit at the start or try doing shit tests then you are going to be the one vetted out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:19 PM
9

It's only difficult if the only thing you are looking for is getting laid. Women have a keen nose for the smell of desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:54 PM
-1

Depends on your definition of a friend. A friend is someone you are deeply involved with . I don't believe that most men are friends with rapists but it's almost a certainty that every single person has an acquintance who is a rapist. Personally I never had a friend who turned out to be a rapist, there were creeps for sure but they went to the trashcan the moment their weird behavior came to light. On the flipside, there were a number of false accusations against some of my friends. By false I m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 11:34 AM
5

People generally hate to be wong about things. For some, if they made up their mind about something or someone then no amount of evidence will sway them. It's not even about the guy being a rapist, it's about them being wrong to to extent of supporting a rapist for years and they can't accept that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:21 AM
2

Nope, I'm in a country with socialized healthcare. I wanted to give my 2 cents becouse the OP was aimed at that. Yes, this is still better than american healthcare, I don't really want to complain becouse at the very least I can ease my pain without going broke. But yeah the system has it's problems, especially in countries with garbage salaries becouse the better doctors are still flocking to private practices.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 11:17 PM
1

No, you misunderstand. Dental problems are included to the point that they aren't causing physical discomfort and danger to your health. This usually covers teeth removal, root canal treatment, fillings and necessary oral surgeries for thinks like exploding teeth. I think it even covers the cheapest plastic teeth prosthesis. But more modern dental care solutions are not covered like rebuilding teeth, braces, veneers etc. Basically anything you can substitize by the procedures listed above. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:18 PM
19

It's not gender affirming care at all. Men go bald, baldness doesn't take away from their expression of gender identity. You could probably make a better case for conditions that make women lose hair. Whether gender affirming care should be a part of social heathcare is highly controversial. Not becouse people are whatever-phobic but becouse most cosmetic - or whatever judged as "non-essential" - procedures are not covered by most social healthcare systems. Example: reconstructing the abdominal …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 01:50 PM
1

You can have an opinion of it but striaght up asking your partner to change is a step too far imo. It also highly depends on the woman you are with. If she always dressed like that then I wouldn't think anything of it. If my girlfriend who always wears oversized baggy clothes went to somewhere without me in a formfitting dress with half her chest out then I would have questions and concerns.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 12:28 AM
0

You are very hellbent on your idea that witholding sex is about manipulation. You are not even trying to see the other side of the situation so let me paint you a picture one last time then I'm done arguing with you. Let's say you are a woman looking for a long term partner. You are acting in a way what you describe as authentic, when you start dating guys you are not witholding anything at all. Let's say you get pump & dumped again and again, every time by guys who feign genuine interest. At wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 10:02 AM
0

You are moving the goalpost back and forth to fit your narrative. You refer to sex as something that women give to men, not something two people share betwen them. You are fixated on sex as if that was the only reason you would even date someone. The whole point of witholding at the beginning is filtering people like you, so I'm not suprised that you are mad about it. No matter how much you try to villainize these women, people are allowed to change their preference and look for different things…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 01:51 AM
0

I mean you have different expectations of someone you are just having no strings attached sex with than someone you are planning to be with for a long time. Nobody likes being lied to about something serious going on and getting ghosted after the guy gets what he wants. So the pull up the safety rails to avoid disapointment. Plus it's not like there isn't an equivalent for guys with girls they are willing to fuck and be FWBs with but don't want to date. Different expectations, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 11:32 PM
0

I mean if sex is not satisfactory you shouldn't marry until you figure it out. If it's not negotiable and you are not satisfied then sure, leave the relationship. That's what you should be doing. But I'll say that it's not necessarily hypocritical to hold off on intimacy with a long term partner when you have a history of hookups and one night stands. For the former you are emotionally invested and want things to be stable in the long term. You hold off becouse you don't want to be played by hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 10:32 PM
7

I think women are right who do this. It's not like they don't feel witheld becouse of it. If there was a world where people could safely have sex as soon as the spark hits, it would be ideal for everyone. But the problem is, there is a considerable amount of guys who try to lie and manipulate their way into their pants. Feighning genuine connection and promising love but once they get what they want, they leave. The only realistic defense against these people is holding off on sexual intimacy an…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 10:13 AM
5

To clarify, I meant that men who are verse-, bottoms, and feminine are an equal amount amongst straight, gay and bisexual men - but straight men are less likely to discover they are a verse/bottom/feminine due to being more likely to feel pressured to conform to gender norms, which is what most straight women prefer. Bisexual and gay men are more likely to have discovered they are a verse-/bottom/feminine. But the problem is, you don't necessarily know who's bi and who's not just by looking at t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 09:02 PM
3

All the reasons you listed are based on stereotypes and labels. When you categorically apply those reasons to every single bi man, you are in fact being biphobic. wanting a man who is only or almost entirely a top, and Bisexual men are more likely to be verses and bottoms. Depends on the individual, not the sexual orientation. There are plenty of straight men who enjoy being bottoms, there are plenty of bi dudes who want to be top both with men and women. wanting a traditionally masculine man, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 08:15 PM
3

Difference is, gay men are attracted to other men. If you are not a gay man or a straight woman, you are not attracted to them categorically. Trans people are not identical to cis people. If you are a straight man who wants biological children then a trans woman won't be who you are looking for. Also if said trans woman is still has male genetalia, that's a dealbreaker for 100% of straight men. Becouse they are not attracted to it by the fact of being straight. Fatphobia isn't real but if it was…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:56 PM
7

Yeah it's not like they are bad people but here's an idea: When you exclude bi men from your dating pool but not straight men, it's the bisexuality that's bothering you. There is no difference betwen straight and bi man other than bi men's attraction to men. If that's the metric by which you exclude them, it's biphobia / homophobia. You have a problem with them being attracted to men, you don't want that in a partner. It's not a big deal, doesn't make them bad people, it's not even harmful becou…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:35 PM
5

Yeah, it's biphobic but like who cares. Why would you want to date someone who is grossed out by your sexuality? If bi men and biphobes avoid dating each other it's a win-win.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:21 PM
–

There is an argument to be made that there is no difference betwen a straight and a bi man other than the later having an attraction to men aswell. When a straight man doesn't want to date a trans woman, it's not trasphobic becouse the trans woman is not phisically identical to a cis woman, having a dick or an artificial vaginawill be a dealbreaker for some guys. Other guys might want bio children. When a person doesn't want to date people of a certain race, it's not necessarily racist. If you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:15 PM
3

OR they aren't broadcasting their encounters precisely because of the stigma that's still attached to visiting prostitutes. that's probably true for the small number of men who do visit them. It's pathetic af regardless of legal status. Tho most of those men tend to be married and have children so idk if I would call them an incel. How do you know that the average Joe doesn't know it is decriminalized ? Did you survey all average Joe's in your country ? Aight if you wanna go down this road, let'…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:28 PM
10

Uninformed and completely ignorant take. Prostitution has not solved or prevented incel behavior anywhere where it's legal. You are projecting your desire to visit whores on to other men. In reality there is a very little subset of men who want to use prostitution as a substitute for dating / relationships. Source: am from a country where prostitution has been legal for decades and we even have websites where you can sort betwen whores by location, age, what are they willing to perform, how they…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:02 PM
4

I don't think that the red pill says that single moms can't date, just that you shouldn't date them becouse there is no reason to invest yourself into someone who already has the living manifestation of baggage from a previous relationship on a higher priority than you will ever be. Ofc this highly depends on your age, after a certain point it's reasonable to expect that a future partner already started a family but that's not something you should necessarily settle for below 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 10:37 AM
1

Depends on your definition of "good". My bottom line for that is going the extra mile to do good to others without self-interest, most people are not good. That said, most men are not bad eaither, just an average mix of good and bad qualities. In these discussions "good" usually translates to "won't hurt you, is dependable, nice to you, won't cheat on you, etc." which most men do live up to. I think where the disconnect happens is women getting the brunt of bad treatment from men in relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 01:25 AM
7

On the contrary men are drifting away from progressive feminism because a lot of progressive feminist dudes were among the ones not getting laid, and then on top of that they would get personally attacked whenever they asked why women still didn't like them despite all of the support. Yeah dudes like that have always been clowned on by both sides. They have been called nice guys, soyboys, Low T, beta males and more recently performative males. It's essentially a humiliation ritual to pander to p…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 02:50 PM
2

Imagine being such a narcisist to genuinely believe that your pussy is the holly grail and you get to decide what ideas are allowed to exist by selective breeding. Newsflash buddy, there are progressive parents with children who hold conservative beliefs and vice versa. Young people tend to be counter cultural. So even if your delusion was correct, it still wouldn't mean anything more than another swing of the cultural pendulum. Plus there are millions of conservative women who on average are mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/25 02:45 PM
6

I was describing your participation to the discussion lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 07:43 PM
6

I would qualify flicking the bean to ragebaiting strangers online a disability too but here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 07:05 PM
6

I will continue debating with you once you take the time to actually read what you are responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 05:21 PM
5

You can’t say “abusers are impossible to spot and men aren’t mind readers” and “women should’ve vetted better if they dated abusers”. Either abusers are hidden or they’re obvious, pick one. There is a world of difference betwen platonic friendships / acquaintanceship and veting a romantic partner. For the later you spend significantly more time with the other person, doing a number of activities together and getting to know them intimately. By the time you are in a commited relationship you have…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 04:58 PM
11

So now men are not mind readers who see red flags from the 1 second. By that logic, how do women get together with abusers when the red flags are so apparent? Becouse they aren't. The most restrained person you know could be an abusive pos to their partner and the most short tempered meathead could be the most submissive gentle giant at home, you literally can't tell unless you are intimately involved with them. Because every time a woman here tells about abuse somehow that's not the reaction of…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 03:12 PM
31

At this point nobody but the youngest of men expect any form of empathy and considerstion from women and that's only becouse of the lack of experience. Women can not only get away with treating men horribly, they get socially validated for it. Every man who ever opened up to a woman will tell you how that ends. On the bit about abusers you couldn't be more dishonest. In fact, people will socially ostracize abusers even when the only evidence of them abusing a woman is an accusation. Crazy concep…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 02:25 PM
1

Are they not expensive? I googled escorts in the city I am in and the average price is about $400/hr, and that's illegal as far as I understand. Escorts are considered high end, that's not the price range of most prostitutes. You can find clean prostitutes as cheap as a grocery run. In legal brothers in Nevada I heard the prices are in the thousands. Let's say, you want to visit those escorts once a week - that's 2k a month, 24k a year. while the median income is what? 40-45k a year before taxes…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 10:39 AM
1

Oh was that too broad of a statement for you? Aight. Zero tolerance policy which means criminally charging all illegal border crossings. Increased immigration enforcement through ICE Tightened asylum eligibility Reduced the cap of refugee admissions Transit country restrictions which means denying asylum seeker admissions of immigrants who have already passed through countries without requesting asylum seeker status. Travel bans from primarily muslim countries Tightening the criteria for legal m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 12:43 AM
1

When you are seeing a guy, having sex with him should come after you are already secure in the relationship. This takes different time and things for different people but generally I'd say 2-3 months of dating with some sleepovers and family meetings sprinkled in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 01:03 PM
3

I think you are way too radical to understand nuance. There are policies that have been issued under Trump that work in the best interest of everyone, including women. The border policies for one make public safety better for all americans.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 10:54 AM
77

They genuinely believe they don't exist. People like OP are convinced that the far left has a monopoly on pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:35 AM
25

Bro I hate to break it to you but your left vs right tribalism is not a men vs women issue and you can't invoke change by boycotting sex with men you politically disagree with. There are a metric fucton of conservative women who have and will continue to sexually validate conservative men. Idk where you got the idea that radical leftists have the monopoly on pussy, it couldn't be further from the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:30 AM
–

Didn't interact with her enough to be able to tell definetly but I assume they were decent becouse she was all up in every event with networking potential. The academic advantage mainly manifested in getting put on a pedestal despite her work being mid and often plagarized.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:27 AM
4

I've seen this happen with one of my classmates when I went to Uni. What she would do is getting together with men in any position of power and move on to the next one when an upgrade was available. She started off with an older guy, she swapped to a local business owner who conviniently also employed her after getting together then she changed to one of our teachers who could secure academic advantage for her and also hook her up with industry figures. The whole thing was very shameless and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:29 PM
3

Oh I don't doubt that, it's just "more" in the same way a Hentai anime with a storyline and named characters is more than an out of context animated sex scene. It's not that much more sophisticated to deserve the nuance, it's a media outlet for adult content. That's all there is to it. If there were releases of Icebreaker, Pucking Around, ACoTaR, Fourth Wing or any of these books with all sexual content removed from them, they wouldn sell a single copy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:48 PM
8

You sound like the people trying to rationalize watching etchi / hentai for the plot. While the narrative itself can be important the get people there, ultimately it's beholden to one purpose: getting people off by playing into fantasies. I will look weird on people watching rape hentai, I will look the exact same way on people reading smut with those themes aswell. It's about time we start looking at people reading smut in public as if they were watching porn on their phone. I saw exerts of tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 12:11 PM
1

I'm very sorry you feel that way, maybe you should re-evalutate things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 02:40 AM
1

The book didn't sell 150 mill copies when it was published and you know that. Most people who bought it knew exactly what they were getting.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:53 PM
5

It needs to be destigmatized as well. No it doesn't and it never will. There should be a level of cultural shame around sex work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:57 PM
0

Let's not be dishonest here, everyone is aware of the themes in 50 shades, even people who never read it. You don't go purchasing the most notorious dark romance book without having at least some level of interest in the themes that it has.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 09:55 PM
1

Not a me problem but a men problem. A lot of men dont have any friendships where they can be vulnerable. Im glad you got that but thats not the majority of men. Men struggle so much with isolation and lack of intimacy (in a non-romantic way). That's a generalization. It's more of an individual shortcoming than a "men problem". It's up to you what kind of friendships you cultivate. Most men open up to their male friends, idk what gives you the idea that male friends who hang out are just stoicly …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 04:40 PM
2

Mental health issues that snowball into drug abuse and suicide attempts are very common among sex workers. It's a traumatic line of work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 04:15 PM
3

The wife, duh. I think you are missing the point why I highlighted the marital status of men who visit prodtitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 04:13 PM
3

Most of those men are married and have children btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 02:02 PM
2

What makes you think most men could even afford to visit a sex worker regularly? Are you seriously going to pretend that sex workers are expensive? Especially when you factor in how many women would willing allow physical sex rather than just online pics and videos there is going to be massive demand by men for a small number of women willing to put up with men’s sexuality on the regular. The demand can't keep up with the overabundance of supply in the sex industry. That's the reason why sex wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 01:34 PM
1

I'm with you on the first half. Male friendships are just watching a sport together and talking about that. This is a you problem bro. You cultivated the wrong friends if that's what your friendships look like. My bros are my main outlet for personal struggles and I am for theirs. How tf do you not expect camaraderie out of your friends? Sex work is a bandaid for the patriarchy that tells men they can't be vulnerable with their friends and family. So they try to tape over it with the one thing t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 01:14 PM
4

Bro some prostitutes are cheaper than a grocery run. It's not the affordability, it's the lack of interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 01:02 PM
10

Yeah it's a common fallacy. Prostitution is legal here too and most people don't even know that it's legal. OP is wrong, most men don't want to visit prostitutes, they don't even think about the option of visiting a prostitute. Sex work is not some all in one solution to loneliness. Men want to feel wanted and desired, these are automatically off the table with sex work.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 01:00 PM
2

Mental health prostitution is the most insane term lmfao I meant the damages in mental health that prostitution comes with lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 12:53 PM
2

I mean, I'm sure a man could pay a hooker to hold him while he cries so maybe not necessarily a sex only service As I said, if the desire for affection can be fulfilled by a paid service of any kind for someone, they should do that. They don't need a relationship. I pay $255 per half hour with my psychologist though, maybe I'm thinking prostitutes deserve a pay rise. I mean you are not wrong. Anything short of becoming disgustingly wealthy doesn't reflect the sheer amount of hazards, damages in …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:35 AM
1

I've spoken to men that's gone down this path and many said it wasn't worth it/made them feel worse. Not suprising, paying for sex is degrading af.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 10:24 AM
16

95% is rich. Most men are craving forms of affection and intimacy other than sex. Stop projecting. Tho I agree the the small number of men who would be satisfied by visiting whores should do that instead of wasting other people's time. Just like women who can't commit to one man should stick to whatever works for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 03:17 AM
–

The courts act in favour of the kids, not the mother or the father, in principle. Whatever benefits the child must be considered, even if it harms the parent(s). This idea hinges on the assumtion that child support payment goes into things that benefit the child. Which the parent who recieves child support has no obligation to prove. At the very least they should be required to provide documentation that every last cent was spent on the child's benefit. So either the state has to pull the weight…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 09:16 AM
–

Men consent to parenthood when they have sex what part of this is not clicking? No, we don't. If you think we do then the same applies to women therefore abortion should be banned outside of medical emergencies. Women consent to the possibility of getting pregnant when they have sex and abortion is their final out because of bodily autonomy. After a few months pass she’s in the same position as the dad LOCKED in to child caring. How convinient. They you act suprised becouse of the sheer amount o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 08:54 AM
–

A good practice is only sleeping with women who you wouldn’t mind knocking up. :) I don't think you want to go down that road. You apply this principle to women and you got yourself a pro-life talking point right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 08:40 AM
4

Depends. Millenials but especially Gen Z is aging a lot slower than previous generations. I would say 30 and above whenever you can afford to have a kid. Tho I don't believe that anyone "should" have a kid who doesn't want children.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 11:28 PM
1

It quite literally is a perfectly valid excuse. Autism has a spectrum, what you see as an excuse is literally impossible to overcome by some. What you say by this is equal to telling a person in a wheelchair to stop whining for a ramp and just walk up the stairs like everyone else. Somewhat agree with the other points.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:18 PM
29

That cultural pendulum wiill swing back with a force that breaks the sound barrier. Keep going like this and Trump's america will look like an utopia compared to what will happen in the UK.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 05:08 PM
1

Likening someone to fictional serial killers is certainly one thing to add to the conversation lmao. I got Dahmer glasses tho. My girlfriend likes them a lot so you might be onto something.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 02:18 AM
-30

Read the fine print. Sabrina Carpenter on songwriting advice. She's not wrong, misandry sells. So do oversexualized album covers. She's playing both sides to farm engagement. Edit: Idk why facts upset you, if anything this backs up how normalized misandry is. That you can actively monetize it. Edit 2: for the more challanged among us : no, I didn't say that sexualized album covers are as bad as literal hatespeech. I said that both of those things are monetizable, which is a fact.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/12/25 03:47 PM
4

Stolen terror actually goes hard and perfectly describes what is happening here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 11:48 AM
0

Considering that my rapist died before I could prosecute him How do you want to prosecute a dead person? I didn't have any evidence because he held me hostage and deleted everything I did have.... If you were held hostage there are other types of evidence that come with that. That's no longer just a rape case, it's abduction and police doesn't take either of those accusations lightly. It sucks that I can't get a copy of my police report because he's dead and protected. ??? Police reports are pub…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:40 AM
2

Be my guest. Keep shooting yourself in the foot, I don't really care. It's your problem, not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:28 AM
0

Words have a meaning, your personal interpretation of them is meaningless. You invalidated your stance better than I ever could, well done.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:18 AM
0

So what are you suggesting? Start convicting people based on nothing but one person's testimony? Becouse where most of these cases fail is not being able to meet the standard of evidence that the crime did actually occur and the intercourse was non-consentual. But yeah definetly, dude. I'm sure people wont start abusing the fuck out of the legal system if you can put someone behind bars without any evidence of wrongdoing. It surely will never be you on the recieving end of that. /s You couldn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 02:16 AM
2

It isn't. Not by any definition,. Here let me help you out. Oxford dictionary: "Rape the crime of forcing somebody to have sex when they do not want it or are not able to agree to it" You are not forced and you as an adult woman have the ability to give or revoke your consent before or during intercourse. You can't revoke your consent retroactively, that's not how it works. You putting your bad decisions in the same universe as rape is an insult to every person who actually got violated. Take so…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 01:11 AM
1

Agreed. I have seen men on social media admit to lying about their intentions so they can sleep with women. Not only that, they are encouraging other men to do the same. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice... How many men would do that if women didn't sleep with them before even spending a miniscule amount of time getting to know them, doing shit together etc.? None, becouse it wouldn't worth the husstle. You got 0 rights to complain when you don't expect any gestures of commitment before …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 10:42 PM
0

If rape were actually illegal, more perpetrators would be behind bars by now Infantile logic, maybe look into why that's the case. Look at the facts about these criminal cases instead of making up your own. For one, by far the biggest cause why it's hard to convict rapists is that over 70% of victims don't report the crime. Instead of in high status positions. That's all I'll say on the matter. Apex fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:38 PM
2

It's funny that you have to flex your homophobia in an attempt to vindicate your point. If you consent to having sex with a man, and end up regretting it later then you got played, not raped. Should have vet better. Just like men are not owed sex, you are not owed commitment just becouse you opened your legs by your own volition.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:34 PM
9

I feel like historical context is extremely important here. The women who say that have not suffered any historical oppression. They use historical oppression as an excuse to act shitty to others in the current day. Excusing this behavior is just plain disrespectful to the women who actually lived through those times as well as socially corrosive becouse everybody wants a victim card now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:59 PM
2

This wouldn't be such a common thing if women didn't enable it and I mean that in the most objective way possible. Here's what you can do about this as a woman: make it not worth the hustle. That's it, really. The number of guys who do this would plummet if sex wasn't excpectable by date 3. If you genuinely want a long term partner then vet them correctly. Make them hit every base before you are sleeping with them. Make them wait for it a couple of months, expect more gestures of genuine commitm…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:53 PM
–

Yeah exactly, in the end of the day that's what dating is about. Getting to know someone and checking if you are compatible with them or not. My first date with my girlfriend was grabbing coffe and hiking up to the local watchtower, it was great.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 02:15 AM
–

It might be anecdotal or whatever but in my experience a lot of men are center and left leaning in their ideology, including me. I think the cultural shift did reach men aswell. Sure, we could do without the rampant misandry that has been normalized in western society but there are a lot of new avenues for men that has opened up. It used to be that the man was the provider period, while you can still do that becouse there are traditional women out there if you know where to look, being your own …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:12 AM
1

Generally speaking, most people could use spending time as single and not looking. The worst thing about relationships is that they are viewed as a must have, something you can't live a fulfilling life without while it's more like a lifestyle that fits some better than others. I think it heavily contributes to people putting up with toxic partners and staying in bad relationships. This dependency on romantic relationships is a problem that causes a lot of pointless suffering. That said, I also t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 11:43 AM
2

You can set the bar however high you want, being able to reach it is your problem not mine. You are entilted to that. You are not entilted to going public with your outlandish standards and not get ridiculed. You are not entilted to shame people for not living up to your standards. Nobody is shaming the woman who decided that anything short of Chris Evans is a no go when she's keeping that information to herself. Having preferences is ok. Openly saying that the man you are looking for has to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 11:11 AM
1

Before you critique others social skills you should have some yourself. Women do not. Being passive and insisting that men initiate every interaction is not a social skill. Fair but the problem is that a more universal rule overwrites this. The one with the pussy gets to make the demands. Women are not expected to have good charisma, it doesn't really matter how they are becouse there will always be men in their orbit. Women decide who gets to hit, so men adapt to their demands. It will never be…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 09:53 AM
2

On one hand I kinda agree that a lack of charisma and socoal skills are the main factor that causes this, on the other the cards are very much stacked against guys who don't have a natural affinity for socializing. You say that it stops being an excuse in adulthood but where exactly should an adult with bad social skills get good at it? By adulthood most people have their inner circle of friends and pretty much no free time to spend on getting to know new people. This only gets harder with age w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 09:11 AM
1

Women will say they like a man with ambition but what they really mean is proactivity. Ambition can be sitting before a computer screen 12 hours a day which will be a massive turn off for a lot of people even if you are producing highly valueable work. They don't want a homebody, that's what they mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 12:41 AM
1

What baby, we are talking about the first dates lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:23 AM
1

Great for you. Ultimately that's the way to go when you are shooting for long term companionship. I wasn't at the time of these dates. Idk if this was supposed to be a gotcha but I genuinely think this is what you should do when looking for a partner, not just a fun time. My point was that despite women saying they do this it often works out differently in practice. Not all women are conservative with their sexuality, not all men are horndogs hitting whatever they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:22 AM
1

Oh excuse me, is he required to bring a wedding ring to the first date aswell? This is some real delusional shit right here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 09:32 AM
-2

That's not a relationship, that's being a sugar baby. It's weird that you have trouble comprehending the idea of companionship and putting in equal effort and compromise. To quote you: I feel bad for whoever is with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 09:29 AM
1

At the time of posting that I was 18. It was 9 years ago. That little fucker you see there already slept like 5 girls of the same age or older. Good times but I'd lie if I said that I'd go back. Enjoying life way too much for that in the present. You know you lost when you have to dig in that deep to try to insult me. Guess what, I don't care who you are or what you look like, I don't need that information to invalidate your points. The fact that you actively look for ways to ad hominem me is pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 09:01 AM
1

I feel like I'm talking to an alien. Why would he need to prove that on the first date? How does paying for a date translaze to "I will have a child with you and support you" in your head? Also, if anyone needs sone kind of assurence it's men for the reasons stated. Tho I'm willing to meet on the middle and say that hook ups have their risks for everyone and you don't deserve the sugar baby treatment just becouse of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 08:47 AM
5

Not really, I made it pretty clear in my first comment that I'm grateful for my GF and that I don't engage with dating outside of my relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:36 PM
0

This whole argument is over the fact that men created a system 🙄🥱 WOMEN DID NOT START THIS TRADITION. Cool, then you don't mind looking at a calendar and facing the fact that you are in 2025, not 1925. all golddiggers trying to dig their way into a cheap meal from a subpar restaurant 🤡 Those who contribute nothing yet expect the man to pay for everything? Yeah, pretty much. You are in an indefensible position. You claim that it's an insignificant cost yet make a problem out of paying for your ow…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 07:53 PM
2

Sir please read my comments again, but slowly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 07:25 PM
0

I'm in the lucky position where I don't have to choose betwen entilted hoes and actual prostitutes. It's not me saying that the latter is a better investment, it's the men who dabble who say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 07:22 PM
4

Prostitution is not legal everywhere. Where it's legal, they do and an increasing amount of men find it a better investment than trying to pull someone like the person I replied to. Besides, I'd LOVE to see a situation that you would consider "men manipulating women into sex" on a date. My money's on a mutually consentiual one night stand where the guy choose not to pursue the relationship further after the fact and the woman is mad about getting rejected.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 06:54 PM
2

46% of all pregnancies are still, in 2025, unplanned. That’s reality Nothing to do with what I said. If that proves anything, it's that women are still irresponsible about their reproductive health despite having several preventive measures at their disposal. Including but not limited to condoms, BC pills of a large variety, spirals, plan B, etc. It doesn't change the fact that 99.9% of the time people are having sex, they don't do it with the intention to procreate. Humans have always been long…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 06:14 PM
5

When I used to date around*. I don't have a deathwish. Good to see that you are engaging with the argument in good faith btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 05:58 PM
3

Ok, and? That doesn't change the fact that you have access to condoms, pills, spirals, plan B etc. and when push comes to shove, abortion. If you are a guy and the condom broke, you are fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 04:19 PM
1

Sex's biological function is procreation. Humans are long beyond just fucking for biological function. What do you think birth control is for? What do you think gay people do in relationships? Why do you think there are hundreds of kinks that don't even have PIV? Why are there childfree couples? You have the understanding of a 12 year old on human sexuality. It only makes any sense if you are willfully ignorant to the world around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:44 PM
11

Who the hell doesn’t want anything to do with a man that they went on a date with 5 times? Golddiggers, escorts, women looking for a meal ticket instead of long term companionship. Obviously the woman likes you and is getting to know you. Cool, then she can contribute to the dates as they are based on mutual interest. But in your sick, porn rotted, sex crazed brain, she’s “using you” because she didn’t give you access to her body yet No, Sherlock, she's using the man becouse the dates are one-si…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:37 PM
6

Deadweights on society for a cup of coffee 🤣 Yes, if you do nothing but take without giving anything back, you are a net loss. I sincerely feel bad for whoever is with you Spare your performative sympathy, she's having a great time and so do I. However, if that wasn't the case I would live like a monk before putting up with someone like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 03:00 PM
1

Oh yes. Total freeloader for a cup of coffee 🤡 Way to miss the point. It could be as little as a cup of coffe and if you expect me to pay for your shit without even offering to chip in, it's done. In fact that's why I sticked to coffe dates, they are a great filter of trash individuals for several reasons. If you ask a woman out, be prepared to pay I am, and i am happy to. It's no about who pays, it's the attitude towards it. If a woman asks you out, she should be prepared to pay. Sure but I'm s…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 02:50 PM
0

That’s what dating and sex is ultimately about. When you are a religious puritan maybe. Speak for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:58 PM
4

There are more birth control methods available for women than I care to list. It's 2025, not 1925, if they get pregnant they failed to make the appropriate preventive measures. Sure, men can't get pregnant and that's the exact reason they have no agency when unintended pregnancy actually occurs. They either walk / pay for termination or they are on the hook for the next two decades depending on what the woman chooses. By the current state of reproductive rights and accessible birth control for w…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:51 PM
0

Yet to see one. Every time I heard that from a woman I just met, we were having sex either at the end of that exact date or directly the next one afterwards at the latest. Not that these were lasting relationships or even relationships at all but it goes to show how well that saying stands when tested at the slightest. On the other hand I personally know men who hold off on sex for months when entering a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:23 PM
0

Closer to the norm but there are plenty of entilted parasites here aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:16 PM
2

I was happy to pay for my GF's coffee and icecream on our first date, didn't expect anything in return. If she was expecting me to pay then I would have gone dutch and there wouldn't have been a second date. Not trying to date an entilted freeloader. People use you as much as you let them. Tho i'm kinda suprised men put up with this shameless trash behavior for the slim chance of hitting it. There are decent women and they own a vagina aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 01:14 PM
27

You left the most important bit out of your framing that flips the whole statement on it's head. women are trying to get wined and dined and courted without giving anything in return. It's a funny double standard that the guy is the entilted one for wanting to get his dick wet hundreds of dollars and several days to weeks in but not the woman who thinks she deserves that kind of investment without lifting a finger just on the basis of her existence. Guess what, if you don't want to feel like you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:46 PM
2

No, I was saying that men who claim that they need a woman to want to get better don't actually want to be better. If they did they would do that on their own. They want someone to coddle them while they don't actually improve. Or that a woman cannot genuinely want to help someone improve without it being a power trip? Didn't say that but it is a common thing tho. There are plenty of somen who view their partner as a pet project / investment and are discontent with what they offer at the beginni…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 05:02 PM
3

Nobody who got backstabbed thought that the other person was capable of that. Ironically, that's a condition by itself. I can be 99% sure that my friend wouldn't fuck me over for personal gain BUT if he were to do that, our friendship would be over.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 07:34 PM
1

Then how come that misandrist hog of a nurse who got arrested back in this year for brusing and breaking the bones of infant boys did what she did to inflict pain on the most vulnerable members of our society? No goals, no ends, just sadism.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 12:59 PM
4

You know, there is this webcomic where the crazy punk guy slowly calms down after getting with a girl. Cuts his hair, starts dressing more conventionally, removes his neck tattoo etc. Conviniently the girl doesn't change one bit, obviously. Someone made an inverse of it where the guy stays the same and the girl is the one that gets crazier and more unconvential by each panel. I kinda feel like that with my gf. I'm stubborn and stay true to myself, which ironically is one of the things she likes …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:17 AM
12

"Fixing a man" is a common power trip for women. They want to be the reason why someone wants to better themselves, the person who sets them right. It's foundamentally a toxic and narcisistic idea. Not suprising that women's romance novels are filled with this shit. Like, sorry Becky, I have more friends than you do and make twice the money you make. What gives you the idea that out of the two of us I'm the one that needs fixing? Similary, the men who say they want that don't want to be "built u…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 09:49 AM
15

No it is not. Just becouse you make a gesture out of love doesn't mean that your love has no conditions. Both men and women make personal sacrifices for their partner daily but if those partners were to cheat, that would be the end of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 09:38 AM
14

That's not a proof of unconditional love. I'd take a bullet for my best friend but there are numerous fucked up thing he could do that would cause me to beat him half to death. People who think unconditional love exists lack imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 09:33 AM
–

creativity Lol marketing Fair to some extent creating a community and staying in shape Lmao, even. You don't know what you are talking about, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 11:06 PM
–

Are you comparing comedy, an actual creative industry that requires significant acting skills and charisma to someone fucking / hanging out with you for money?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 05:21 PM
–

Every job anyone does the person “signs up for”. Not sure what your point is with that. I thought we were discussing how difficult different jobs are. What I mean is that I wouldn't consider it a hardship worthy of mention when that's literally what working as a whore is. Yes, you will have sex with people you are not attracted to, why tf do u think they pay you for? I don’t believe there is zero rough sex with prostitutes. From the documentaries I watched, it seemed like many men went to prosti…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 09:52 AM
0

A prostitute has to sleep with men she finds unattractive which can be very disqusting and mentally taxing. That's literally the job they sign up for. Also, I can imagine many of the men can be very rough and the sex might be painful. There’s also the safety aspect. You really don't know what it is like, do you? Nope, the moment a guy steps out of the boundries he gets the boot and goes on to a blacklist for every whore in the area. The only case where getting rough is tolerated is sex trafficin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 03:04 AM
1

Damn, what did you do to piss that poor guy off? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 02:36 AM
2

If the bottom 90% of the supply can't capitalize on the demand, that's a pretty good indicator tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 02:35 AM
3

I'm eagerly waiting for your totally realistic alternative explanation, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 01:00 AM
2

This is not the same. You can like doing something but not like it enough to make a career out of it. Should have phrased it more clearly. The power tools are the product they produce, not what they use. It's not the same situation at all. People who have phones don't LOOK DOWN on slaves. No, they look down on the usage of slave labor by companies. Doesn't stop us from making the purchase. Thinking mcdonalds is a dead end job is not the same as looking DOWN on McDonald workers. It literally is. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 12:56 AM
1

That doesn't make it hard, just hazardous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:43 PM
1

Unless they are sex trafficed, everything else is an excuse. You can always just take a dogshit job instead and keep your dignity.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:24 PM
2

I'm aware. I made that argument in response to the person I was replying to. I don't like how people jump to blaming the demand as it's something so ridiculously massive, while it nowhere near enough to justify the amount of sex workers. Not even close.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 10:21 PM
1

Prostitution also doesn’t sound like an easy job to me. All the things I said about porn also apply here. No they really don't. Porn stars have to go through pain and uncomfortable positions becouse they look good on camera. A shooting can also take several hours. No prostitute is doing all that. I'm sure it's taxing and tiresome but hard? Nope. Camgirls/onlyfans is a bit easier but I still don’t think it’s an easy job, as I said, there is a reason so few people do it. Then you compare it to lit…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:21 PM
1

The overal income of OF models averages out to 100-250$ / month. That's with top 1%-ers pulling in millions and the bottom 90% making close to nothing. Not enought to even justify doing OF as a sidegig.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:59 PM
3

feel threatened by women who profit from it or control it Why would men feel threathened by a woman they pay for sex? That's like saying I feel threathened by the guy making my fast food burger becouse they make minimum wage lmao. If anyone is threathened by whores it's women who are a worse long term investment than visiting sex workers regularly. if they could get it freely, the industry wouldn’t exist. the rest is just excuses to rationalize insecurity Tendency to postitution has been observe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 04:31 PM
2

Cool, now apply the same logic for camgirls, onlyfans models and prostitutes in general. Out of sex workers pornstars get the least animosity. They are more pitied than hated at this point. In fact, the only pornstar I remember being controversial in recent history is Mia Khalifa and that's becouse she's a lying hypocritical bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 04:15 PM
4

Apparently not enough to finance the livelyhood of all sex workers. Not even close. The bottom 90% of Onlyfans doesn't make enough to justify doing sexwork as a side gig, even. The demand literally can't keep up with the supply when it comes to sex work.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 04:08 PM
1

You do? And how exactly did you gather this totally unbiased information? Most women suck at sex aswell. They don't recieve complaints becouse men would rather fuck a starfish than nothing at all. Besides, if an adult woman just lays there, doing nothing for her own orgasm and expects the man to take care of both her and himself then I'm sorry but that's what she gets for being terrible in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 04:04 PM
1

by the same men who slept with them? You had me until this point. Nope, never. Men who do that do it exactly becouse they can't hit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 02:20 PM
1

You could flip it and say that the demand is meaningless if there aren't any women providing the supply. There is a very high demand to every fucked up thing you can imagine. Does that justify distribution? Of course not. The same way I wouldn't vindicate a drug dealer who's practices ruined lives just becouse "his services were in demand" , I won't vindicate a prostitute. They are complicit by providing the supply. They are actively perpetuating the cycle. So if you genuinely have a problem wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 02:19 PM
2

I genuinely think so, yes. " it's not better but it's different" heavvily applies. Besides, there are whores who specialize in things you can't reasonably expect out of a partner. Like dominatrixes. I also don't think there is a scenario for a society without prostitution. There will always be people willing to buy and sell. As there were for thousands of years in every single documented civilization. That said, it will never be percieved as a high class or even respectable job. Imagine being so…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 02:07 PM
3

You can't reason with someone who doesn't come from a place of reason. OP seems to have a level of animosity to men, then scrambled together some points other people already made with no substance and called it an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 01:56 PM
6

and to answer your illogical comment, women aren’t shaming men for using sex workers, Suuure. Mind reading through some comments here? we’re shaming men for being hypocrites, consuming what they denigrate That doesn't make them hypocrites. I'm pretty sure you are consuming multiple things made by people that you don't like or things that you think are immorally created. By that standard every person on the west is a hypocrite and the term is meaningless. What would actually make men hypocrites i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 01:26 PM
0

"If I advertise myself to an audience that is the exact target demographic of what I'm selling, I'll make more sales" deep understanding of the market This is what people who don't know jack shit about marketing percieve as some 5D chess level marketing strategy. In fact it's marketing 101 that you can understand if you spend 2 seconds thinking about it. I saw preteens surfing the CSGO market with more marketing prowess than this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 01:15 PM
2

99%male audience Wow and she figured this out by herself or did someone have to explain it to her to bring her on in the first place? You know someone is put on a pedestal when someone praises them for the most elementary level things.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 12:59 PM
5

" If you don't think being an assembly worker is a good career, how cone you use power tools" "If you have a problem with slave labor, how come you have a phone?" "If you think working at McDonalds is a dead end job, why are you still eating there?" I can recognize sex work and endorse it's legalization. At the same time I don't want to have anything to do on a personal level with someone who is okay with selling their body to be used by old fat greasy men. I don't think a sane, well-adjusted, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 12:39 PM
8

Kinda based. Though I don't know what makes you think that they would be upfront about visiting prostitutes in the past. I have a friend who used to frequent prostitutes, happy ending massage parlors and dominatrixes. I doubt his future wife will know about these encounters. Then again, I doubt his future wife will tell him about her slut phase if there was one. Besides, if you look at what the main demographic prostitutes report, it's almost always middle-aged, married men with children. So it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 12:32 PM
6

It's also becouse prostitution mostly happens under the table in japan.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 12:23 PM
3

I'm relatively consitent on this. I'll consider it work. Lowly, shitty, straight up pathetic work, but work. Then proceed to shame both the seller and the buyer. It doesn't matter to me if it's men or women on either side of the transaction. I'm looking at it like this: Seller: imagine having nothing of value to offer other than your body / company. Buyer: imagine being ok with degrading yourself to the level that you think you can't get any unless you literally pay someone for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 12:21 PM
24

Becouse they hate that men have access to prostitution, they absolutely despise it. Men having a way to acces pussy instantly is their worst nightmare becouse it democatizes sex. By doing that it destroys the power dynamic in which they are the ones to set the standards and decide how many hoops a man has to jump through before hitting it. So they actively stigmatize it while also performatively supporting prostitutes to feel good about themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 12:09 PM
2

"If you find being an assembly line worker to be a bad career choice, then how come you use power tools?" I'm not visiting prostitutes and never will but it's very simple to understand. If you are a customer then you make a living likely from your proficiency or knowladge in your field. Hence why you have the disposible income to blow away on prostitutes. A prostitute on the other hand is only able to make a living by literally selling her body. People who look down on prostitutes but also visit…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 11:57 AM
-2

I did provide a study if you prefer reading one on a pretty much unquantifiable subject. If you think these studies are gospel, then I expect an apology since the one I linked vindicates me. Also, my opinions are like clockwork compared to your non-arguments that each boil down to you having a seething hatred for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 08:18 PM
-1

Collective Shout identifies itself as feminist and claims responsibility, partially. Obviously they are not entirely honest but you can read their side of the story right here: https://share.google/ZPHYyiTWx7Q3p5Qm6 Here you go, I'm still waiting for counter arguments with sources provided. I find it funny that I'm the only one expected to back up my claims, yet you guys feel free to talk out of your asses. Oh and if you were to do that, be sure to read through them this time before littering my…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 09:59 AM
–

It's a high profile case covered by mainstream platforms. Again, trying to pin YOUR ignorence on me and refusing to look up what the fuck you are arguing is on you, not me. Calling me a liar becouse you are uninformed shows the weight of your opinion perfectly. Here's a quick read as a show of good faith, though I'm 100% sure you will continue your denial considering that you have shown none. Thousands of games have been censored from major platforms, with LGBTQIA+ creators caught in the crossfi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 02:23 AM
1

Google is free. Don't pin your ignorance on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:11 AM
1

You replied to multiple people in that timeframe. Gaslighting doesn't work in a written form.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 06:50 PM
1

Just recently a "feminist" group called Collective Shout got through to payment processors like Paypal, Mastercard, Visa etc. and actually suceeded in blocking the ability to purchase games with sexual content on certain platforms. Almost every single one of them had a male target audience, were 100% ethically produced and self-founded. This little stunt resulted in thousands of creators getting deplatformed and blocked from making sales. Meanwhile smut books are sold on the shelves of grocery s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 05:11 PM
5

I didn't claim that. I'm far past caring about any woman's opinion of me other than my partner. If you were to ask how all this relates to the conversation, my awnser would be that I claimed that men get more shit for their sexual expression than women do, these are examples of exactly that. So are you're debating or what? I'm doing some heavy lifting here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 01:05 AM
0

I remember, and you are deflecting. 50 Shades of Grey's popularity has nothing to do with it's Twillight roots and all to do with the fetishization of abusive relationship dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 12:58 AM
3

The men who get criticized for things like hentai are criticized for being public about their sexual desires without prompting Smut is literally sold on the shelves of grocery shops. I personally had 3 teenage classmates carrying a copy of 50 Shades of Grey to school when it was at peak popularity, neither of them got any shit for it. Also ever heard of Booktok? They are pretty fucking public about it. Having a body pillow of a character you find hot and having explicit drawings hung on your wal…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 12:50 AM
7

Porn usage (specifically by men) having a cultural stigma despite literally most men engaging with it. Smut books only started to recieve a mild amount of heat recently and only in nieche online spaces. Media that depicts male fantasy is criticized for being problematic, going as far as removing or altering the "problematic" content Porn is heavily regulated and restricted while smut books are literally sold on the shelves of grocery shops Depicting conventionally attractive women is criticized …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 09:25 PM
2

I didn't personally insult you. I said that I refuse to believe you are stupid enough to think that the studies you linked paint an accurate picture. That probably substitutes to saying that you are arguing in bad faith (tho your very first comment made that clear as day). If anything, linking random studies based on their conclusion without taking one look at them is the sign of losing a debate. You can't even defend your own points, just pull ideas out of your ass to justify your clear hatred …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:50 PM
3

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-relationship-between-pornography-use-and-harmful-sexual-behaviours/the-relationship-between-pornography-use-and-harmful-sexual-attitudes-and-behaviours-literature-review This study solely looks at adult males, I wonder how an unbiased study would come out about consumers of smut. The increased aggression is defined as "legal but harmful" and it's pretty much a summary of 17 different studies. No clearly defined methodology of research. No mention of…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:20 PM
6

That's like saying female gooners go out of their way to get victimized. Completely insane baseless delusion that you just pulled from your ass. There is literally no proof of your claims but plenty to the exact opposite. Crimes like that are at a historical low, despite the fact that access to porn has never been easier. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:24 PM
9

The difference is: men are shamed for these fantasies. Told that they shouldn't have them and also media meant to appeal to male fantasy is getting altered and democratized. Smut books didn't recieve too much heat until recently, and women won't be shamed for being into freaky shit the way men are. Nobody is telling women that they shouldn't have these books. Nobody is trying to rewrite these books to confirm to "more realistic standards" towards men. People are critical of women's smut books be…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 03:47 PM
0

I love that you got no response to that perfectly reasonable follow-up question lmao. They are lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 03:38 PM
16

So you are saying that the reason why women try to insert themselves into and altering men's media, inventing terms like "the male gaze" and bitching about sexy female characters is that they are upset and insecure about it? Becouse they have no control over male desire? Yep, checks out for me. Great self-report. Btw men are hostile towards smut books becouse male preferences have been shamed for literal decades. It's completely retaliatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:32 PM
6

Almost guaranteed at least one man in in your family has jacked it to highly questionable porn. Being a family member doesn't exempt someone from being gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:19 PM
12

Men should not judge women about their fetishes. To each their own, god knows men have some fucked up things. I think it's 100% retaliatory. Women have criticized and judged male sexuality for decades. Terms like the male gaze and unrealistic standards towards women are completely normalized, yet not the opposite. I'm all for leaving everyone alone and letting them get their rocks off to whatever (within reason) but that also includes women backing the fuck off from men's media.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:16 PM
18

Fair. Then women can kindly fuck off from criticizing and inserting themselves into male fantasies and trying to alter them in a way that doesn't make them feel insecure. I'm all for letting you flick the bean to whatever depraved shit you want (within reason), but women don't get nearly as much shit for doing that as men do. That's just a fact. The reason why men are highly critical of smut books and calling women out is completely retaliatory. You can't be at the moral high ground about male f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:12 PM
4

Fifty Shades of Grey sold over 150 million copies worldwide. It is by far the most popular smut book. If that indicates anything it's that most women who are interested in these type of books are into that shit. Even if (in your opinion) it doesn't represent prevalent trends of the genre.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:07 PM
27

Don't forget "love triangles" or straight up homewrecker fetish. The idea that a man is willing to compete and "risk it all" for the basic bitch MC is also very common. Ngl smut books made me realize that the things that get women hot and heavy is just as gross if not more so than what dudes are into. Tho I think the same applies as it does to porn, NSFW art etc. It's just a fantasy and while Becky flicks the bean to the billionaire vampire werewolf commiting things on a woman's body that would …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 11:42 AM
1

Yeah, that's why im saying that it's self-imposed and in reality they absolutely have an ability to do something about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 06:15 PM
1

Been there, done that. That's exactly why I'm pushing back hard against the nihilistic sentiment that this is just how things are and you can't do anything about it. It was so bad that I had multiple suicide attempts and had a depression (diagnosed) episode when I barely ate for like 3 months. Yet things only got better once I've decided to change, put myself out there and proactively seek the company of other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:01 AM
2

I think it's not within the realm of pills. My personal take is that regardless of problems the porn industry has, it would be 1000x worse if it was banned and the industry would go unregulated. Ultimately everyone is responsible for how they (and by extension their childten) rot their brains out on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 06:14 PM
1

Which means they are showing their true colors and their true colors is that they see celibate men as inferior. Offline, they are forced to moderate themselves because their identity is known and what they say to others may not necessarily reflect what they actually believe. Very nice, now go back and read the second part of the argument where I explained why this response is incorrect. It's subjectively valid which is why they feel loneliness. Fair but you can't claim that a subjective issue is…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:30 AM
1

Bruh I've been taken for 6 years the fuck are you on about lmao. Didn't have a problem with wrapping it up. But hey, at least your flair checks out if nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 10:58 PM
1

That's one way to put it I guess. I wouldn't call it ego for the same reason I wouldn't call the natural fulfillment after a workout routine egotistical. It's more like the mental aspect of having sex: feeling desired, connected to the other person, etc. I think knowing that the other person is enthusiastic and genuinely wants to be with you at that time and you feeling the same way towards them greatly cobtributes to that mental satisfaction. And I do think that this doesn't make me unique. I t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 07:40 PM
1

Online interaction is an extension of society. It is but people are more unhinged and emboldened becouse of the lack of social barriers. I'm pretty sure everyone in this thread have seen an online expression that would get someone fired if they did that irl. You also see a lot more weirdos and chronically online freaks' opinions becouse normal people don't engage with social media as much as they do. So I would take everything you read on reddit with a handful of salt. Redditors are almost alway…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 07:05 PM
1

Yeah absolutely
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 06:15 PM
3

Sure you are, mate
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 06:11 PM
1

Still, society has yet to come to a point where it is indifferent about singlehood with men. At this point, society is still expecting men to get laid or else they are deemed as failures. I have first hand experience of people that treats voluntary celibacy as equally bad as inceldom and implying getting laid is the only acceptable solution to inceldom and not becoming a volcel and gaining a positive and healthy mindset from it. You say society but I bet my house that this conversation happened …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 05:42 PM
1

The sex could be terrible and there is still a self-fulfillment and validation aspect to it. Also what I said, that the girl went home with you becouse of who you are, not becouse of what you give her in exhange of getting you off. I think you are not going to find no-strings attached sex memorable if you decide to settle at some point regardless. Carnal pleasure fades but when people usually reminisce about old glory it's always "damn I was a stud back then" not "wow I paid that whore so much m…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 05:28 PM
1

Eh, some women want motherhood very badly. So much so that even if they clock out of dating entirely, they might still hold on to the possibility. I would assume that a number of women don't go through the whole process, if they want to get pregnant without any intent to have a father in the picture, they just go out on a few one night stands and get themselves pregnant. There is an argument to be made that this is inherently selfish and hurts the child but what can you do? Desire for motherhood…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 04:29 PM
1

I disagree. Even if the sex is mid, if you pull a girl you did it becouse of your game, your attractiveness, you putting yourself out there and you know that she slept with you for the love of the game. You made it happen, which inherently makes it more fulfilling. Visting a sex worker puts you in the same bracket as these digsuting greasy 60 year old balding men who can't make a girl drop her pants unless they literally pay her to do it. The woman you are with is indifferent at best and disgust…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 03:36 PM
1

Most people are looking for shit to get mad about, they don't really care. The reason they go silent is not collective shame or guilt, it's more like "ok, drama's over, go next". As fucked as this sounds, this is a form of entertainment. Nobody is really invested.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 03:13 PM
1

Rizz is literally a slang for charisma. Yes, part of it is social awareness. How you present and carry yourself and your skill to be appealing to as many people as possible. It's not only a real thing, it's the most attractive thing you can have. If you want an example for a conventionally unattractive person with rizz, look at CaseOh.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 03:06 PM
3

So, you are clueless about it as well. You can say that to try to invalidate me but proposing that a 27 year old dude is clueless about your alleged "epidemic" does no favors for your argument. You are making this assumption that if a dude is lonely then he must be complaining from his couch Absolutely and I'm yet to be proven otherwise. doesn’t have a circle of friends Never said that, you can be a passive couch potato and still have a group of male friends who are also like that. Online gaming…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 02:56 PM
3

Oh it does exist, but that doesn't make it valid or women's responsibility to fix. Assuming that you are a grown ass man, you are responsible for your own happiness. If you want to spend all your free time indoors anti-socially, then you don't get to complain about the loneliness that comes from it. Nothing is stopping you from taking initiative, meet new people, put in a little bit of effort on your end of the bargain. Other men do that and succeed, blaming society and women for your individual…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:55 PM
2

And that's the thing. Dudes who conplain about this never take initiative. They complain that companionship isn't served to them on a silver plate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:40 PM
1

Funny you say that becouse a lot of men pride themselves on not taking part in hookup culture and even looking down on men who do. In the adult world, hookups are not glorified. If your coworkers see you in your 30's still going out every week to get shitfaced drunk and hooking up with some rando, they will judge you for it. Singlehood in adulthood is more normalized by the year, we are slowly approaching a point where most people won't want to settle until their mid 30's.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:36 PM
0

Hordes of men AND WOMEN voted for someone that go against women rights. There, fixed it for you. Women make up the majority of voters, even if you go by the assumtion that every single man voted for Trump (which is false), women still had the power to out-vote them. They choose not to. Otherwise agreed, the male loneliness epidemic is basically a meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:23 PM
3

He's also self-reporting on being romantically unsuccesful. No sexually active man wants to ban birth control becouse they don't want unwanted pregnancies either. Only bitter and sadistic losers want that becouse they view children as a karmic punishment inflicted on it's parents for the cardinal sin of having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 01:14 PM
2

If you think hedonism wasn't a thing before contraception was, I suggest you to read a book. If contraceptives were banned the only cultural change that would come of it are more dead infants in dumpsters.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 12:56 PM
8

Genetically engineered catgirl sex slaves which are made to have enough cognitive function to clean themselves and cook food but not enough for free will and disobedience, obviously /s
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 12:53 PM
5

The "male loneliness epidemic" is self-imposed. Nothing is stopping you from socializing. Most people who I hear complaining about this shit spend all their free time behind their computer screen and act anti-social every time they are forced to leave their home. They never made the slightest effort in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 12:44 PM
8

Spot on. Women like to frame it like men were creeps in these scenarios as if the grown ass fucking women didn't know exactly what they are getting into. I think anything goes within reason among consenting adults but if someone has a problem with these relationships and wants to call the guy a creep they might as well be consistent and also call the woman a whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:14 PM
2

Pointlessly gendered, women do that aswell. Another uncomfortable fact about human sexuality is that many people who insist on getting their partner off don't do so becouse they care about the other person, they insist becouse it strokes their ego. Most people just suck at sex, regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 07:54 PM
6

No fucking shit. The things that attract young women to older men are money, status, stability, the fact that they already have their shit figured out. Not even older guys with actual 20 year old girlfriends believe that the reason they are with them is raw sexual attraction. Sure they might play into the fantasy becouse everyone needs affection but they are aware of the conditions of these relationships. Truth is, there are girls who value an easy life over sexual gratification and are willing …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 07:01 PM
1

In western society that intersection is really fucking high considering that women ate not relliant on relationships to thrive. But fine, even if we exclude relationships a lot of ugly men participate in hookup culture aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:25 PM
0

shouldnt you be, you know, being good right now? Never said that I was good, I'm a fucking asshole with some good qualities. That doesn't mean that I or other people can't make observations. Less than 100 words of my text on reddit and you diagnose me as some kind of super manipulator and calling me a bad person. I made a general statement on fake behavior, then called you out for projecting. Get over yourself. News flash: moral myopia. There is in fact multiple subjective takes on what is good …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 11:50 AM
15

Nurse Erin Strotman arrested after newborn babies suffer mysterious injuries at a Virginia hospital | CNN https://share.google/PGEzE4SQuPVyoZAcc Whenever someone says misandry isn't real just send this over to shut them up. Not only is it someone inflicting harm on infants out of categorical hatred for men, it also shows systematic misandry. This fucking freak was allowed to run rampant for years and one of the fathers even said that he didn't dare to touch his own infant son after seeing the in…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/25 11:30 PM
0

Keep telling yourself that
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 06:47 PM
1

Any guy who actually works out can debunk that in 5 seconds. To some extent, sure but looks have a diminishing return once you took a bath, wear fitting clothes, had a haircut and got into an average shape. You can't looksmax your way out of having a personality that causes the average conversation with you to feel like a hostage situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:17 AM
2

A lot of these guys make assumtions and present them as facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:11 AM
1

No, it's not all online now. You choose to do it online, that's a completely different thing. Most people still connect with each other outside of overglorified bootycall apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 11:09 AM
1

That's for sure. Pulling off something like that without being seen as an evil piece of shit creep must take some otherworldly level of charisma. Unironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 10:53 AM
2

Yep, absolutely. They are desperately grasping for whatever scapegoat to blame their ineptitute on. You go out in the real world and see all of their cope getting contradicted in 5 minutes. Short, conventionally unattractive guys fucking like rabbits, people in mutually happy relationships, people connecting freely with each other etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 10:49 AM
1

No they fucking aren't lol. Most people to this day make connections either in person or on forums related to their hobby. Dating apps are know to be scams and 90% of the time only used for hookups. Just becouse it's your primary way of looking for women doesn't mean that this is how most people meer each other, it's insane that you think that. We see a general rise of cosmetic surgeries becouse they have become more accessible and affordable than what they were before. Also, a lot of famous peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 10:20 AM
1

False, there are mountains of good people in relationships, they are usually aso fun to be around.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:17 AM
2

They hate that you are right lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:12 AM
1

One is called charisma the other is being a decent person. You are right, a lot of ugly mfs fuck just by having game.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:38 AM
1

Also becouse the people complaining about personality not matering are usually horrible and being around them is like being locked in an escape room.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:35 AM
-3

Huge self-report and you don't even realize it. E: Quick reminder that if you are only trying to be good when you want to get something out of it, you are not a good person. You are a bad person trying (and failing) to be manipulative.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:32 AM
0

Elliot Rodger looked decently, had wealth, and he still failed due to his gross personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:29 AM
2

You can be the most fun person among your boys but having the ability to be fun around people who share the same hobby and interests as you doesn't mean you have the charisma to bring that same energy when you are trying to flirt with a girl. It's a completely different ball game. Sometimes my GF sees us wheezing our lungs out on some stupid shit while playing for a hour straight and asks me what was so funny. I explain it to her and she just stares at me like I told her the most painfully unfun…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:05 AM
11

Yes, opting out entirely with 4b and deciding the relationships aren't beneficial in any way and more of a detriment. It's fascinating how women endorse MGTOW when they are the ones doing it. Suddenly it's not a cope for sore losers who can't get any, right? Except that it still is and always will be. No self-respecting, happily single person needs a sight that says "I am happy, this is my choice :')"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 03:14 PM
2

On the contrary
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:39 AM
1

I quite literally dropped a female friend when my GF said she was uncomfortable with her. Well dropped is misleading, more like let us drift appart. If anything, I noticed women allowing themselves too much lenience in a relationship when it comes to male friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 09:58 AM
1

Never been happier that Redditors don't breed.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 11:54 AM
1

I don't agree with it but I think the reason why is that being a genuinely good person isn't a requirement of attractiveness for most people. Attractive people often don't get a reality check becouse people around them are putting up with their shitty behavior in an attempt to get with them. Tho it's idiotic to assume someone's quality of character based off of their attractiveness. There are caring and humble people who are also hot and there are mfs who are downright evil and cruel despite als…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 09:08 AM
16

There is some truth to this but let's stay consistent. If a woman claims that she has been abused by every male partner she ever had, you would be a considered colossal asshole for questioning her actions. I think this applies both ways, if you can't find it in yourself to say anything positive or at least neutral about an ex or admit any mistakes of your own then you are likely full of shit. This reminds me of a lady friend I used to have who claimed that all her exes raped and beaten her. Her …
/r/EverydayMisandry19/10/25 09:26 AM
1

It's a weird question becouse men don't really hate sluts outside of not wanting to date them. They may hate the fact that a known slut rejects their advances but I think that's different than just hating a woman for sleeping around. The #1 hater of sluts are other women, often ones that used to sleep around themselves ironically enough. The reason why is that sluts undermine an important power dynamic, sex as a bargaining chip. To awnser your question I don't think most people in the west would…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 07:59 AM
2

Don't know chief, I've personally haven't been with most women to be able to tell. What I can say however is that I know a few men who define love as getting fed and mounted which isn't a lot better if you think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/25 12:22 AM
1

As a guy who has been on the recieving end not even once but twice, I reasure you that women do that aswell. Honestly I disagree ,I think that both cases were on me. I didn't demand commitment before anything happened and just went along with it hoping that the weekly appointments of therapy talk into sex will eventually snowball into a real relationship. In hindsight I'm really glad they didn't and I could have cut that shit off at any point, my only regret is that I didn't do it sooner.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:35 PM
2

My girlfriend: Attractive Genuinely kind, not just performatively to pat herself on the back Relliable Supportive, she comforted me even while I was literally shaking on the ground from nerve pain. Great sex and open to try out new things Patient Great work ethic True to herself Ngl if she ever broke up with me, I'd never date anyone else again seriously. I doubt anyone could top her as a partner and I feel very fortunate to have found someone like her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:01 AM
1

All love is conditional. We even hold friends and acquointances to certain conditions. You being unaware of the conditions you set out for others doesn't mean they are not there. If you think otherwise feel free to hit up Toothless Betty, the local 67 year old homeless woman who hasn't showered in a month. I'm sure she would be head over heals for some lovin'. If you feel frustrated for not being able to meet the conditions set out by most women, my genuine advice is to work on yourself. A lot o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:42 AM
1

And letting it fly to keep your delusions intact at your own expense makes you a sucker
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:29 AM
2

Not always the woman. I'm a guy who was in that position twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:24 AM
1

Don't get me wrong, the person who refuses to commit knowingly exploits the other person for their own comfort. That said, the person who wants to commit kinda puts themselves in that situation to begin with. They don't vet their partner well. Don't set up appropriate boundries. Have no standards of commitment before sleeling with someone. Ultimately, the other oerson can't do anything to them that they don't allow them to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:23 AM
3

Been there, shit sucks at the time but ultimately I'm happy they didn't work out. Ngl OP's stance lowkey hurts men becouse it assumes that only men are capable of being emotional manipulators for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:18 AM
4

The risk for them however is far more serious. Not really, it's 2025. They have acess to countless ways of contraception to prevent pregnancy and honestly, it's not like the lack of them stoped women in the past. If shit really hits there fan, they can always get an abortion. On the other hand if a guy knocks up a chick, that's it. He's in for two decades of legal and financial obligation to the girl if she decides to keep it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:13 AM
–

Both MGTOWs and 4B are fucking losers who can't get any or lack the interest in the other sex to begin with. Their whole movements are just coping and seething over their pathetic lives. I'm yet to meet ONE person practicing celibacy out of principle despite having the opportunity and desire to have sex. People rarely if ever make personal sacrifices for their ideology. Usually it's the other way around, they flock to ideologies that alligns with their circumstance.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:19 AM
2

I never saw and argument losing me on the first 3 words of the title. Congratualations, it's a new low. Didn't bother to read the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:13 AM
2

I think everyone can have whatever standards they want. It's just that they don't also get to complain when they fail to attract that specific type of person, they don't get to lash out on the whole gender group for not living up to those standards more. If their standards are superficial then they also shouldn't get mad when they get played due to their failure to properly vet romantic partners. I hold both men and women to this standard. Take some accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:07 AM
15

Look at how many people use incel as an insult. Yep it absolutely exists. I find it very funny, as if the ability to have sex was a valueable measure of character. Even Cletus, the 70 IQ redneck fucks his toothless 300 pound wife in the ass every weekend in his trailer. It's literally not an accomplishment if your standards are low enough. And even funnier that regardless of how much women want to abolish slutshaming, or extend it to fuckboys, it will never happen becouse most men and women ulti…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:27 AM
1

Men generally have appopriate standards for long term relationships. You wont ever talk men out of sleeping with most women when given the chance tho and honestly I don't think that's the issue with dating in general. But I will say that men will put up with shit from women they would get arrested for way more than they should.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:49 AM
–

Fucking imagine the backlash a man would get if he called a woman pathetic for opening up. Saying that she's incompetent becouse she expects the man to solve her problems. Even if that's the case, imagine thinking THAT about someone you supposedly care for coming to to express their feelings to you. The mask didn't just slip, it fell on the ground and shattered. This is the mindset of a sociopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:40 AM
–

If my partner comes up to me with anything that upsets her, I am hearing her out, comforting her and come up witg solutions whenever possible. If I needed to walk on eggshells to frame my emotions just right in order not to cause her to turn me away, then this relationship would be long dead. Maybe learn to be a better team player, OP. Your attitude towards men is disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:27 AM
1

Ngl I never understood the outrage about this analogy. I have heard women making the same comments about getting with a decent guy/keeping one and never took offense. I genuinely think that a lot of dating advice is dogshit on both ends. That said, the fisherman analogy has some truth to it at least. Here's a few I've heard from women. Whether they are good or not you can decide for yourself: "The way to keep a man loyal is making sure he always has a full stomach and an empty ballsack" "If you …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 10:21 AM
0

Dude less people are getting laid now than ever before, Yeah becousee for the first time in history people are not depended on having sex with people they don't want to. systemic Elaborate, I'm genuinely curious what part of the system is preventing you specifically from having sex. Other than anti-rape laws, I mean. So far I'm not sure that you actually know what "systemic" means. Edit: always cool to see a debate thread with peoople downvoting when they can't defend their opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:50 PM
0

I'm fairly divided on a lot of topics here but if you can't get laid as a western man in 2025, that's on you a noeone else. If you feel like you need a relationship then do something about it. Either get your game up or decenter relationships altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 10:27 AM
1

Yup but to be completely fair I think it's kind of an integral struggle. Like, I believe that a lot of people genuinely want to think that they are attracted to good people. That behavior and good character trumps looks and charisma to them. I'm willing to bet that a lot of misandrists who have endless complaints against male behavior have at some point bent over backwards to some asshole they were attracted to ( or would in a heartbeat if given the opportunity). It's all very performative.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 10:14 AM
3

I think this idea comes from the post WWII era. I'm pretty sure you're familiar but the ghist of it is the social contract of the time: "Serve your country any way you can, do what you are supposed to day in and day out, in turn you can own land, provide for your family and have personal freedoms outside of your duties" The two main things that changed since then are automation which now makes it a lot harder for the borderline retarded to find well paying jobs which would be needed to fulfill t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 03:27 PM
–

So you want me to be responsible so men don't have to be. The point of taxation is to benefit the safety and quality of life of the public. As per the social contract. If you can't wrap your head around how better wellfare for single parents benefit your life as an individual then I suggest taking a vacation in a thirld world country. Everyone is expected to do their part and honestly you drew a really stupid line in the sand if this is where enough is enough. Not the over the top milltary spend…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:08 PM
–

It isn't the child claiming the resources, it's the mother. There is no law that monitors what those resources are used for. Besides, it's the same pro-life argument that says that a childs right to life is more important than the mother's bodily autonomy. If you didn't consent to be a parent, then you shouldn't be responsible for a child, that's the bottom line. Of course that would mean that the mother should be entilted to more governmental wellfare. You call this "stealing from the taxpayers…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 07:59 AM
2

So your argument for abortions is possible health risks. If it's not about autonomy then abortions should be allowed only when the mother is at risk. You are speaking directly against your own rights here. Overall, I don't think that fetus's rights should trump women's rights. No human being should be allowed to use other person's body without their consent whether they die without this access or not. So how is a woman's right to claim a man's resources based on a decision the man didn't get to …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 02:01 PM
1

Care to guess about the ratio of men who nut inside women without caring because they figure it’s not their problem to the minuscule number of women who actively sabotage their birth control or inseminate themselves with garbage sperm? Seriously? Considering that we have a number of high profile examples for both of these violations I'd guess it's a lot more common than people think. Let's not pretend that women poking holes on condoms became a stereotype out of thin air. To add to that I would …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 12:29 AM
1

Ever heard of women who sabotage birth control on purpose or straight up digging a condom out of the trashbag to inseminate themselves? Or just protection failing on it's own? Female rapists, hello? Let's not pretend there aren't a lot of women who are completely okay with decieving their partner in favor of getting their precious mini-me. Bro I don't care, it's not rules for thee not for me, either everyone is be entilted to reproductive rights or no one is.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 11:17 PM
2

Becouse the survey inherently studies the cases by gender of victims and perpetrators. Duh. My main point is that these studies are flawed by nature becouse they work off of skewed data. The number of female abusers is grossly underrepresented. As I said, treating statistics as gospel is stupid one way or another. They should be looked at with and handful of salt.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 09:49 PM
1

Damn, you just solved the problem of abortion! Women just need to stop leting men cum inside them, how didn't we think of that! /s Using archaic pro-life talking points when discussing male reproductive rights doesn't help your case at all, in fact it shows a double standard which may alienate people from supporting your own rights to bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 08:56 PM
1

Your argument holds as much water as telling women the same thing. Let's flip the script. Best defence against unwanted pregnancies is making men wear a condom. Women don't have to let men ejaculate inside of them. Even if he uses a condom, be on the pill. Rapes happen, contraceptives can fail or be tempered with, stealthing and deception happen. You can't cover every case by "just have safe sex bro". If you give the tiniest bit of fuck about reproductive autonomy then I don't see how you can be…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 08:12 PM
2

Abortions are about women’s safety and lives. So you are saying that unless there are complications with the pregnancy that threaten the mother's safety / life, they shouldn't have access to abortions? That's fucked up. Imo abortion is a matter of autonomy and men should be entiltled to their reprofuctive autonomy the same way women are. Nobody should be held responsible for children that have born without their consent. But, you are right on the male contraceptive bit. Personally, I can't wait …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 07:53 PM
1

For someone critical of proper data representation you neglect to mention the disparity of report betwen male and female perpetrators and victins. In actuality men are both more likely to be reported and are less likely to report abusers. A decent chunk of data is missing, these studies don't show the full picture, unknow data is speculatory at best. People who quote statistics like gospel are malignant anti-intellectuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 07:19 PM
15

Women have a larger in-group bias. They will be supportive towards women on the basis of them being women alone. This is very surface level and lasts as long as it isn't too bothersome, too much of a commitment or until they get a kick out of it. They will bail the moment they have to make a personal sacrifice. Men will rarely show any comitment to someone they don't have an established relationship with but past that point they will go greater lenghts to help these people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 12:51 PM
3

When women communicate their expectations, they are already pissed at you for not accomodating those expectations. You are expected to figure out what they want you to do without them telling you oitright. This is managable once you get used to it and start feeling the vibes of disapproval. Female sexuality works differently than male sexuality (less frequent desire, needs buildup) which ends up causing rifts in a lot of relationships. It's a snowballing effect really, man doesn't recieve the se…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 02:42 PM
–

If that's even true then the numbers are grossly overinflated. Whether or not a country has legalized prostitution, most prostitutes that do the job voluntarily work under the radar either out of convinence (tax evasion, no official records of them performing sex work) , necessity (illegality, stalkers) or both. What is ALWAYS important to note is that statistics work off of information we already know, everything else is speculatory at best and the majority of crimes go unreported. Prostitution…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 01:51 PM
–

Just becouse we are not speaking out about something, it doesn't mean that we are approving it or are unbothered by it. Men will go crazy lenghts to fill the shoes of what society thinks a "man should be". This also means that just becouse we play along with what women performatively say are desirable opinions and traits, doesn't mean that we are blind to what they actually value.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 01:27 PM
3

Interesting you ask that becouse I noticed the exact opposite. The "I can change him" attitude is much more common in women, it's even a romantic fantasy for some to reign in the bad boy. For men, I don't see that they would have anything more than a passing interest (in sex) with woman they don't work with in a long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 04:46 PM
14

I'm against all forms of sex-based hatred, that said when I went against the grain with men, calling them out the worst I got was a couple of downvotes. I got banned out of subs / recieved temporary bans for engaging with women / trans people as an equal debate partner. One of the female dominated subs I've been banned from removed me becouse I called out a woman for being openly homophobic. Call me a sexist or whatever but as long as reddit displays this blatant preferential treatment, I'm not …
/r/EverydayMisandry08/08/25 07:39 AM
29

A few posts I reported there actually got removed but these were absolute extreme cases. I have 3x that amount of replies that state no violation of TOS while the reported content was literally about killing / raping / torturing /enslaving / castrating men. I'm all for edgy jokes but if I made any of those posts targeting women I wouldn't just get banned, the local authorities would be knocking on my door.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/25 09:11 AM
0

Most women don't have high standards to begin with. While some men get teased about riding the community bike, far from enough to make them feel bad about it or stop doing it. In fact, if a woman is too easy then she will be at the center of attacks (by both men and women), not the men she sleeps with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:27 AM
19

Ngl my bottom line is that if anyone's defending false accusations or indicate that they are okay with innocent people getting convicted as colleteral damage "for the greater good" then I will assume that they at the very least have played with the idea to make false accusations or have already done it before.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/08/25 05:18 AM
-1

why are you assuming I want people to be around me Only on the basis of you crying about being invisible to women lol. Figured you wouldn't lean into that if it didn't bother you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 02:18 PM
0

Most women in relationships definetly compromise on the "won't embarass her" part at the very least. Edit: not meaning that as a derogatory thing. Guys being dudes are great
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 11:36 AM
-1

To start off I just want to say that people are not accountable to you on what they are attracted to. You got exactly zero rights to be upset that they are dishonest about their type. Moving on to the main point, I think that you are wrong. People date outside their usual type all the time based on factors other than looks. Even people they would have disregarded based on looks alone. I know i'm still young and not as jaded as a lot of people here but on the flipside I'm old enough to be conside…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 11:14 AM
2

Generally both tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:16 AM
3

On the job I've talked to 2 different older women who were scammed out of their savings by accounts with AI generated images and texts. Both of these occured within a week to each other. It happens just as much with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 06:45 AM
1

I would agree with you if not for the fact that women often have celebrity crushes while in a relationship and their version of OF/Porn are smut books. Which for some reason are completely accepted socially despite being a lot more degenerate than 99.9% of the thrist traps and models men follow. If I wanted to go for the low blow and making up non-existent problems then I'd probably respond with a rant about these smut books and how women fetishizing abusive men and infidelity reflects on societ…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 06:38 AM
1

Are you talking about less than 1% of women who have of? Lmao Yes, absolutely. You can try to minimize it but there has been an insane growth in sex work in just a couple of years. In fact, we are at a point where it's an oversaturated market becouse the demand can't keep up with the overabundance of supply. no demand - no supply Having demand for a service doesnt dignify supplying that service on it's own. If you think it does, apply the same logic to illegal drug trade, distribution of child p…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:18 PM
2

Ngl if OF proves anything, it's that a lot more women are open to prostituting themselves than what's comfortable to admit. The deal just has to sound favorable enough. Even if the reality is that it's a net loss to most sellers. Another thing it proves is that prostitution is not a product of desparation, it's something women will choose to perform despite the availability of alternatives. If you have the means to keep an OF going, you also have the means to train yourself do other online work.…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:16 AM
6

Ok. I'll go with you for a moment. What injustice did women do to men One of my buddies got drugged and raped by a woman, another almost got stabbed by one. Every one of my friends who was in a relationship at some point suffered some form of abuse at the hands of their female partner. This isn't historic either, these things happened in the last 10 years. Following the misandrist logic, these experiences would not only validate misogyny but justify it. Yet I'm not a misogynist, becouse I'm able…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/25 09:16 AM
2

When women make an app it’s for women safety not to post revenge corn of men, A man made the app There was revenge porn posted Getting cheated on doesn't validate doxxing someone's home adress and phone number on a public platform.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 03:54 PM
14

Ngl I don't think this "damned if you do, damned if you don't" attitude has ever nudged people towards better behavior. If you dispense punishment for good behavior that will only turn good people into assholes.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/25 11:53 AM
2

Nothing. There are always outliers. People are individuals before they are anything else, that's why sweeping statements and generalizations are wrong. There are observable tendencies that are more typical for one sex than the other but that's all that they are, tendencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 12:58 PM
1

I had a prostitute co-tenant, my country also has prostitution legalized and one of my friends used to visit prostitutes on the regular. Unless you are engaging in prostitution I'm very likely better versed in that world than you are. I'm all for legal prostitution everywhere for the reasons I have already stated. I still think being a prostitute is fucked up and nobody should be encouraged to chase that lifestyle. Social disaproval and stigma serves that purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:27 PM
1

No, not at all. I don't care how prostitutes mess up their lives. I care about prostitution not being socially encouraged becouse the less people are doing it the better. These are not contradictory statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:12 PM
2

So you are in support of a similar app made with the genders flipped where men can do the same to women on a platform publicly accessibe for everyone, right? Well, personally i'm not. I think it's a violation of privacy and the demand for it is degenerate. To each their own I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 06:56 PM
1

We're not. You want to apply "beyond a reasonable doubt" to a woman telling someone what happened to her or how she feels about someone No, I do not. In fact that's a core reason why most false accusations happen outside of the legal system. Individuals you tell these experiences have no standard of evidence, if a woman accuses a man of violating her 9 people out of 10 will automatically believe her. Which is great but it also opens the gate for bad actors to make shit up without suffering the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 05:54 PM
1

Oh I'm 100% certain of that
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 05:21 PM
1

Genuinely who gives a fuck about a girl saying "she got weird vibes" or the ex thing? If nobody cares then why are you defending the app? People care, obviously. What a dishonest response. Grow up and don't act like a general immature dude with an ego problem. Needless ad hominem, again. I asked you not to clump me in with anyone becouse it's rude af.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 04:30 PM
4

Dude what’s the absolute worst case scenario for a genuinely good dude here? some girl he had one awkward date with posts something like“idk he gave me weird vibes” or “he talked about his ex the whole time” and what happens?? I don't think all women thinks like that, I think SHE SPECIFICALLY thinks like that based on what she wrote. You all Who is "You all"? Don't fucking generalize me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 03:39 PM
3

Actually, I said the exact opposite. Maybe read it again. Tho I appreciate you recognizing that any app like that is a tool of gender based hatred. In Tea's case misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 03:34 PM
2

Police frequently dismiss complaints and traumatize victims, and only a small number of rapists are ever convicted and put on a registry. 70% of rapes are not reported in the first place and honestly, I think that statistic is lowballing it. The reason why only 1-2% of rape cases end in sentencing is becouse out of 100 rapes only 30 get reported, 5 makes it into court becouse of the lack of evidence (due to the nature of the crime, not necessarily lying), out of those five, 3-4 doesn't end in co…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 03:24 PM
12

Wait until they start websites like this about women. Your tone will change day 1. They would genuinely go insane if suddenly men could out every bit of information of what whent on behind closed doors on a platform dedicated to that with open access to everyone. And justifiably so, it's an utter violation of privacy which is the reason men are against this app too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 02:18 PM
8

Police and the sex offender registry. Bitter exes with bruised egos are a lot more common than rapists. Anyone can say anything about anyone on an app. But okay let's roll with it. And what if he didn't rape anyone but he gets reviews claiming otherwise? There is no evidence needed to leave a review. False claims appear the same as legitimate ones. The one solution would be to allow men to request the removal of some reviews but then that would just render the app useless becouse the app would h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:51 PM
5

...with Facebook. He got lucky he made the website you are reffering to at a time when the internet was much more of a wild west than it is right now. To put it into perspective, this was at the golden age of Live Leak and websites hosting revenge porn / child porn, a smash or pass website was relatively mild. If someone made that in today's cultural context that would go very differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:31 PM
5

I'm center left but I guess you can be so far in the extremes that anything less than that is right wing for you. I call you pro-terrorism becouse you characterized a designated a terrorist group as freedom fighters. I want you to understand that everyone here down to the most deranged incel is a better person than the people you endorse. You don't get to make accusations or talk down to any of them. You don't have the moral high ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:20 PM
6

This is what chromically online looks like, completely unhiged psycho
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:09 PM
8

If men don't want this, they should stop raping and hating women. This guy just openly defended a terrorist group notorious for hating and raping women. You can't make this shit up, dude
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 12:59 PM
13

dude it’s not about who cares making something valid or not, it’s WHY they care. like if the only people freaking out over an app that helps women flag unsafe behavior are the same guys who either openly hate women or rely on manipulation to date...that kind of says everything, no? what’s the absolute worst case scenario for a genuinely good dude here? some girl he had one awkward date with posts something like“idk he gave me weird vibes” or “he talked about his ex the whole time” and what happe…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 12:36 PM
0

Out of curiosity. What did you think about the app that applied a filter to women's pictures that removed makeup? Or what would you think if there was an app that gathered the profiles of local women and men could vote smash or pass? It would be pretty gross right? Well there you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 12:32 PM
17

while there is nothing wrong with this at first Bro, are you hearing yourself? Yes, there is absolutely everything wrong with an app centered around doxing and the public humiliation of people. People are not fucking products to be reviewed. If an app were made where guys could "review" women, people would go scorched earth on the owners and shut down before it even hit the market. Besides, it's a concept that died on the drawing board. Exes and regretful one-night stands will 10000% use it mali…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 11:43 AM
–

Idk have you ever turned off the internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 05:07 PM
–

Being neutral isn't hostility
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 05:05 PM
–

And what about the women who see hatred of their gender 24/7, have actual experiences being preyed upon, and then are often dismissed when they have a chance to bring awareness to the topic? I feel very empathetic towards them. Especially becouse a lot of my boys suffered similar abuse. One of them have been drugged and raped by a woman, one had been charged at with a knife, almost all of them have been verbally abused or violated by one or more partners. Obviuously, since they are male victims …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 05:03 PM
–

Uhuh, didn't feminists and systematic misandry drive that guy named Earl Silverman into suicide who opened the sole male DV shelter in Canada? Here's the empathetic gender on full display: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Silverman Nice try at gaslighting btw
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 04:44 PM
1

I think you misunderstood me. I don't give a fuck about how prostitutes live their lives. Neither is anyone else. The stigma exists becouse nobody wants people close to them to become prostitutes and nobody wants to associate with prostitutes. Prostitutes are not good people. They are fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 04:26 PM
–

Hate to break it to you but if you provoke aggression, you are the aggressor. Don't demonize entire groups of people if you don't want them to turn into fucking demons. It's common sense and causality. And to be clear, I'm not justifying it, there is no justification to sex based hatred, just explaining the dynamic. Ultimately misandry is just the other side of the coin for misogyny. Misandrists foundamentally promote the same ideology they claim hate. They call it a reaction to misogyny, in rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 03:20 PM
–

To add a bit to that it's also worth mentioning the men who started off as supportive and considerate towards women's issues becouse feminist values were hammered into them during their upbringing then at some point failed one of the purity tests and got demonized for it. That or they kept seeing openly hostile attitudes towards men and got slowly alienated from the cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 12:36 PM
–

you lost me with the whole women shouldn’t support misandry just because it creates more misogynists. I mean misandrists clearly won't stop being misandrists only by consideration of how fucked a worldview it is. You gotta sprinkle in some self-interest. Misogyny didn't decrese out of the blue, it decresed when the culture shifted and it became more disadvantagous to express misogyny than before. One hateful generalization against women could lose your job and get you blacklisted today.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 12:27 PM
–

Following that logic, then misogynists who spawn as a reaction to misandry are...justified? Yeah fuck that ma'am, sexism is sexism. There is no excuse or justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 11:05 AM
–

Women are probably more likely to be killed for loving a man. Or for loving one too many
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:24 AM
–

Its your turn to show the recieps
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:21 AM
–

There are more women in the US than men, statistically they also live longer so more of them are voting age. I'm gonna throw you a massive fucking bone and say that every single voting age men voted for Trump. Even if that were the case, women would still have enough voting power to get Harris into office by numbers alone. The truth is, a lot of women were in favor of Trump and no, they don't care that he is a rapist either. It's getting somewhat tiresome that the rapist in office is used as a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 10:17 AM
–

Nobody is objecting to condemning murderers snd rapists. What people don't like is the guilt by association that these criminals are treated as definitive members of the group instead of the outliers that they are. I'll demonstrate: "this man is a violent rapist" and pointing at the violent rapist. - not sexist, very agreeable, no objections, individual held accountable for their actions "Men are violent rapists" while pointing at the violent rapist - sexist, generalizing, strawman, controversia…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:47 AM
–

Most men are not any more or less moral than women, you demonize them anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:28 AM
–

I’m all for reducing crime in general We all are but assigning shared accountability like this Men cause crime on men; therefore, the answer lies in men. Is counter-productive. Victims an perpetrators are entirely different subsections of people with minimal intersection.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:21 AM
–

Ah, there it is
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:05 AM
–

If you write them off as such then they will be just as dismissive with your interests btw
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:02 AM
–

It costs 0$ not to be a hostile to people on a categorical level tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 09:01 AM
–

Hate to break it to you but if most men in the west weren't in favor of equal rights, you wouldn't have any.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:59 AM
–

Men's attitudes about and treatment of women has never had any significant correlation with how women feel about men That's kind of a false equivilency tho. At no point in history did we have the internet where we can see millions of people going mask off on the most reprehensible shit imaginable. People were never that brave irl. Most of the shit people say in this very subreddit would earn social ostracization to this day. There are studies that prove that social media has tangible effects on …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:35 AM
–

Women can say whatever they want about how they feel about men. That's reasonable as long as you are okay with men doing the same with women. Either both are okay or neither. You can't cherrypick sexism. Perhaps men like you should ask why they feel that way, rather than trying to get them to be agreeable and go along and be nice. Why should men care about why women feel that way when the same women don't care about men issues to the point that they are actively trying to invalidate them? At wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:13 AM
–

They are told. Blackpillers are only validated by each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:55 AM
–

The irony is through the roof. Bro, women are valued iherently, men aren't. You got this shit entirely backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:32 AM
–

"Don't express sex-based hatred towards men" WHAT!? AM I SUPPOSED TO BE PERFORMATIVELY GRATEFUL TO YOU? HOW DARE YOU?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:22 AM
–

1 in 5 homeless people are women ass comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 07:15 AM
–

It's kind of a loaded topic with a lot of fallacies. "Misandry only hurts men's feelings" Systematic misandry has lead to the death and prolonged suffering of countless men. When a man is assulted volently by a woman, he has almost nothing to turn to. There are no male shelters, individuals and law enforcement won't take them seriously or will straight up ridicule them. I could go into details further but the bottom line is that society doesn't care about men's suffering the same way it does for…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 06:57 AM
1

Already said so, becouse prostitution isn't something that should be encouraged, strived for or socially rewarded. Why? For the prostitute: Becouse even in the best circumstances it's hazardous work that is extremely damaging to mental health and potentially physical health. Legal or not, most people will still consider it at the very least morally questionable so performing this line of work will burn down a lot of bridges and future opportunities both professional and interpersonal. Looking pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 11:12 PM
1

I'm partially challenging your views. I agree that legalizing prostitution is the better outcome for everyone. I'm in a country where it's legal and regulated. The only thing I disagree with is removing the stigma. I think it's good that sex work is heavily looked down on. Nobody should strive to be a prostitute, it should be considered the most bottom of the barrel profession someone can do. Likewise, visiting a prostitute should be considered pathetic. Despite it being legalized this is still …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:23 PM
1

Your fiance is low key a pathetic loser if he views male interactions like that. He would also likely get his ass beat in a real fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:38 PM
2

I agree with you to some extent. A lot of male dating failure is self-inflicted. I think charisma is the most attractive feature a man can have. Charisma is learnable and you can build it up over time. The first rule of getting people around you is being fun to be around. That said, male self-improvement loses a lot of people at the obvious double standard. How come Becky who has a butterface and the personality of a wet noodle isn't told that she should improve herself? On the other hand she ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:27 PM
1

I guess your hypothetical person would still expect loyality and exclusivity despite their unwillingness to fulfill the sexual desires of their partner. That basically means that whoever marries them would also have to subscribe to lifelong celibacy. Ngl I'm not sure you can bring enough good qualities to the table to make it worth to most people with a working sex drive. I would consider this person extremely selfish for even suggesting that someone should do that for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 04:37 PM
1

Depends but heavily leaning towards no. You can have the best emotional connection with someone but bad sex / no sex will absolutely sour it. I'm willing to subscribe to exclusivity, not celibacy. If a workaround can be negotiated then it's workable, if they are unwilling to make a compromise then it's not. And this is assuming that there was a pre-existing relationship when this problem emerged. If I was in the talking phase with someone and they told me that there will be no sexual intimacy be…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 04:09 PM
1

Can't think of one but I'm sure it happened at some point. Well, I guess not being hit up and pestered constantly by people looking to hit counts as a massive benefit to my inner peace. I can also be sure that my male friends are genuine and not just waiting for their chance. On the other hand I can think of a few examples when I saw female privilege in full display but I think we can see the privileges we don't benefit from better. The ones we live with just become normal to us.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:08 PM
3

Gonna have to joing the opposition chief, my girlfriend is the best sex partner I've ever had.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 02:46 PM
2

They´re all white collar professionals. So are most furries.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 01:51 PM
1

Showing blind support to anyone based on their sex is fucked up. People should be held to the same standards and looked at objectively. You are right that based on data women are several times more likely to show bias towards their fellow women than men are towards their fellow men. That's a problem. These biases are a net negative in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 01:50 PM
5

But doesn't Tomie literally compel men to brutalize her with her presence alone? I'm a fan of Ito's work but not a scolar on Tomie specifically. Correct me if I'm wrong but her curse isn't exactly depicted as desireable, she is suffering just like her victims do. I believe there may be an underlying theme of toxic masculinity, sure but the fact that Tomie's ability is indiscriminate and will turn any man young or old, good or bad into a murderer shows that it doesn't worth taking too seriously. …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/25 12:54 PM
1

It's always the right decision to walk with caution around people who are overly enthusiastic about causes that don't directly benefit them. People can be expected to always act in self interest. Most feminists are women, most MRA's are men it's not a coincidence. To some extent feminist values are also beneficial to men but most men who align with those values are usually not vocal about it and don't make an active effort in advocating. If a man is a hardcore feminist who even engages in anti-m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 06:39 AM
1

It's a hyperbole to make a point. I could have said anything controversial with a consistent demand. My point is that an existing demand doesn't automatically make creating / distributing / serving the supply morally justified. Hence, having a demand for prostitution doesn't dignify the act of prostitution. Prostitutes perpetuate sex work just as much as the customers if not more so.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 01:17 PM
1

you KNOW they don't want you. You KNOW they are only desperate for money. There is no excuse. Same could be said about any workplace with harsh conditions. Don't want to do it? Don't, you are free to work something else. Nobody forces you to fuck strangers for money, even in desperation there is always some minumum wage job hiring, it's not an excuse. If you sell sucking dick for 100$, you are not being victimised by who the dick belongs to. You made that choice by your own volition. Maybe some …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 04:44 PM
2

No, you are not capable of truly free choice if your brain is physically changed by the trauma. It doesn't magically fix itself when you grow up. You need healing, not deepening the trauma even more. Neither law nor public opinion agrees with this stance. If you need trauma resolved it's up to you too seek help in resolving it. Having the choice to sink deeper is the result of autonomy, you as an adult are expected to act in your own best interest. Actually I believe any casual sex and anything …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 11:30 AM
2

victims of sex trafficking. We are talking about willing, adult prostitutes who are in it by their own volition. Obviously sex traffic victims are the exception, they are forced. Trauma can physically change the brain. The vast majority of sex workes was led into it by trauma or despair or something. Trauma doesn't disapear when you grow up so it's not infantilizing. It is infantilizing becouse you imply that they are not capable to make their own choices. Adults are responsible for resolving th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 10:10 AM
3

I guess it kinda depends on how much are we willing to infantilize grown women. People are having sex in a transactional manner all the time and literally paying money for consent is just the least subtle way of doing that. I think people have the autonomy to give consent in exchange for things beyond immadiate gratification, including money. the vast majority of sex workers really does it out of despair, have trauma, are in bad situation, thera is just something really wrong that pushes them in…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:49 AM
1

I think he recognised that women who are forced to perform prostitution are victims. Unless you consider having the choice to sell sex a privilage I don't see where he said that they are universally privilaged. I never said universally underprivileged You made a sweeping statement saying that prostitutes are not privilaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 12:50 AM
1

Every person in the west is privileged withing the context of global QOL. Comparatively to westen standards prostitutes are not notorious from having a high class wealthy background, however in the realm of e-prostitution there are a number of nepobabies who sell. So it depends on how you define "privilage" and what qualifies as prostitution. Saying that prostitutes are universally underprivilaged isn't true, some are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 10:38 PM
7

People can be selling out of despair, having no other choice how to earn money to survive. Let's say that this is true and if the woman can't turn to sex work, she doesn't survive. What happens when you remove the buyer from the equation? You can't die from lack of sex, it's not a level of despair to justify it. You can't die without alcohol, tobacco, fast food, drugs or basically any vice under the sun. People still phychologically depend on it tho. If that wasn't the case there wouldn't be a m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:51 PM
6

Idk I always viewed sex work as I viewed Casinos / gambling in general. Sure, the demand drives the market but there are always desperste suckers to exploit. OF made it as big as it did becouse of the parasocial aspect which the sellers play into in order to keep their buyers paying. Besides, there is a market for everything. Imagine the sickest, most depraved shit you can think up, there is a market for it. Having a demand for let's say child porn doesn't justify producing and distributing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 09:32 PM
8

Jailing an innocent person is a greater evil than leting 100 potential criminals walk free due to the lack of definitive evidence. For any crime, in every case, regardless of gender. Not just morally but if the imprisionment of innocents is allowed to be the norm, that breaks the social contract which may result in anarchy, riots and drastic changes for the worse.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/25 11:45 PM
10

Yep, I've used this one before and they didn't like it one bit. Just thew shit at the wall saying how much I hate women. It's narcisism, they think if colletral damage was willingly tolerated they wouldn't be a part it. Put either of this psychos before a judge for shit they didn't do and suddenly it's "unjust", "unfair" and "it wasn't supposed to be them".
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/25 11:34 PM
4

You kinda lost me on the last part. Older people, especially in their 40's and 50's are wilding the fuck out. Well, the ones who had no problems doing it when they were younger. I think decentering is also common when people leave long term relationships and they just want to take a step back and work on themselves. If my relationship would end for whatever reason I don't really see myself wanting to build connection with a different person from the ground up and entangling my my life with them …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 01:21 AM
4

Funny thing is that i just got banned from a certain female centric sub for calling out a homophobic woman who reposted a gay man in an attempt to humilliate him. Apparently pointing out a woman's bigotry now qualifies as sexism and incel/MGTOW/Red Pill rhetoric. Regretably, reddit is a misandrist hellhole, preferential treatment is rampant and men get silenced regularly. Mind you, these are the same individuals who claim to be on the "right side of history" and stand for "equality".
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 10:42 PM
0

One one hand, I will admit there are men who try to complain their way into getting pussy. On the other men's complsints often have merit, especially when it comes to double standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 09:25 AM
–

Yes I agree. The problem is that avoiding accountability has become an acceptable standard across the board. Apparently using an example exclusive for women indicated to some people that my comment is aimed at women only or that hate towards single moms was my goal. No, it includes everyone. Shit this whole sub is basically just different groups of people trying to pin their shortcomings on others, it's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:03 PM
–

Taking accountability is doing good by your mistakes and actions that harm others or your own way of life. You can be accountable to yourself, your partner, your family, your workplace, society as a whole etc. There are legal accountabilities, personal accountabilities and interpersonal accountabilities. Taking accountability is not bithing a child into poverty with an absent father. Taking accountability is not blaming an entire group of people for your own individual failure. And so on. Is thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:23 PM
–

This is the pill nobody wants to swallow. It would take some actual accountability to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 05:02 PM
–

These are not Red Pill talking points. Well, not exclusively. I think men across the board could agree with a number of them. I think you are projecting by calling these takes Red Pill, in reality I think most men would rather be for financial abortions for an example than against them. Not just becouse men's reproductive rights are left in the dirt, it's also becouse it is a net benefit for men and people usually act in self-interest. To debate some of your points I also think that it's fair to…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:04 PM
7

Tbh I'm fine with this but it's the kind of edgy humor you shouldn't make if you can't take the same heat that you are dishing out. Like sure, joke away but you have no right to get upset if someone claps back something like "Damn, who allowed their fleshlight to talk" or "Listen up boys, the dishwasher has an opinion". It's the hypocrisy of it tbh. Like when Myron from F&F made an edgy joke saying "If god doesn't care about female orgasm, why should I?". It has been reposted and hated on by peo…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/25 05:50 PM
0

I've never been in an age gap relationship and never will be but one of my buddies was in a relationship that lasted a couple months where he was 21 and the girl was 16. They met through the girl's sister the guy was friends with. The 16 year old was the dominant party in their relationship, she was verbally abusive, compared him to other men in relationships, demanded princess treatment basically every day and overall was a really shitty person to be with. After they broke up the guy decided ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/25 10:56 AM
6

Oh boy, on this very website there are like 50 subs dedicated just for that stuff. I envy your naivety. The sexualisation of transmasc individuals ,trans women, femboys and tomboys greatly contributed to the idea that being trans is a fetish. Thing is, anything can be that people are willing to fetishize.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/06/25 09:42 PM
6

Nope, never worked and never will on anyone man or woman. I find it invasive, creepy and gross whever someone tries to crybully others into relationships they don't want to be in.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 06:36 AM
1

Also the fear that they might realize that they are more attracted to the opposite sex or just go with heteronormative relationships becouse it's easier down the line.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 05:56 PM
4

It's crybullying people into relationships they don't want to be in. Creepy and gross behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 01:57 PM
5

I just think most men would like to be viewed as a partner, not a manservant. Like sure, it's awesome when your partner does nice things for you, we can all agree on that. However, when this becomes the minimum requirement it comes down as the woman treating the relationship as transactional. Which is fine but she can go ahead and find a sugar daddy to accomodate that attitude instead of shaming regular dudes looking for companionship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 02:54 PM
1

If you think this is an absurdity idk what to tell you other than to talk to more people. This behavior in general is exremely common. As in people being entilted and portraying themselves as something they are not, completely oblivious to their true nature. NiceguysTM is just one form of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 07:51 PM
1

It was a pretty popular meme a few years ago, it also has it's own sub along with the female variant known as nicegirls. These subs are pretty dead by now tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 06:37 PM
1

NiceguysTM is actually used for men who are entilted, borderline sociopaths that label themselves as nice in a sad attempt to get into the good graces of a woman. Up until they get rejected ofc. A piece of advice everyone can take home for themselves: If a person goes out of their way to identify themselves with a positive attribute, just get the fuck away from them. Your mental and physical health will thank you. Nice people are not bragging about being nice, they don't have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 02:48 AM
–

Yep, absolutely and if I'm being honest it's even worse if the client is wealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 08:54 PM
–

I know but you said that the main issue that you consider having sex unenthusiastically non-consentual. So I gave an example how that's untrue. The same way someone can choose to consent to sex for something other than their own pleasure, a prostitute can choose to consent to sex in exhange for money. Consent is consent. Don't get me wrong, I consider men who visit prostitutes trash. They lack discipline, have no game, are reckless and disgusting but unless they visit a trafficing victim, it's c…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:22 PM
–

See this is the issue, they do want to have sex, just not for the carnal physical pleasure of it. In functional relationships people want to make each other happy. If there are different sex drives then the low sex drive party will perform sexual things to their partner even if they are not horny. Not becouse they are forced to but becouse they want to pleasure their partner. Idk how it's such an hard idea for some people to wrap their head around, it's one of the more common things in relations…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:29 PM
–

Adults can give or withold consent for whatever reason they want. May it be in exchange for money, status or just wanting to make their partner happy. People have sex they are not enthusiastic about all the time, they still consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 01:43 PM
5

Your "data" is utter bullshit. Reddit in general is not indicative of opinions most people hold in the real world, that's especially true for the sub you referenced. The data for this is basically unquantifiable as it mosty comes down to circumstance. People love to say how sex positive they are, especially here on reddit but that crumbles the moment it is actually challanged in practice. Just as there are a lot of people who say they would never date a sex worker but would throw their life away…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 12:08 AM
2

You seem to confuse logic with practicality. If we remove all forms of personal attraction and feelings then the logical pairing for same-sex attracted people would be to settle for a heterosexual relationship since they get more out of it socially. In practice however both partners would grow miserable and resentful. At that point logic dictates that they would have been better off alone. You can't disregard attraction and desire when you try to determine what the logical pairing would be for a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 02:42 PM
1

Becouse not finding vulnerable men attractive hails from toxic social expectations, not an inherent human trait. Becouse invalidating someone's vulnerability is dehumanising. You don't have to like it but at least be upfront about being a stone-cold bitch and keep your sociopathic takes on male mental health to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 09:35 PM
2

So a buddy of mine got raped by a girl. She basically knocked him out with a date drug and made him to penetrate her. The next morning he woke up with a massive headache, no memories and his rapist lying next to him naked. He paniced and asked that vile bitch what happened and she had the audacity to say something along the lines of " oh, it's not like it was bad for you and besides I'm the one who should be worried about getting pregnant" Harrowing shit. Not only did she rape him, she didn't us…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 05:13 PM
–

Sadly, a lot of men AND women do that. I guess the idea behind it is that men can defend themselves therefore any abuse they recieve must be deserved. I had 2 buddies who had been charged at with a knife by their crazy. girlfriends, literally 0 consequences, nobody cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 01:07 PM
–

You are trying to make an objective statement on subjective preference. A common problem in this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 11:46 AM
31

When people say " emotionally available " what they really mean is " will listen to my problems and be my personal therapist " which is a reasonable expectation but the problem with these people is that they usually want it to be a one way street and don't actually care about their partner's struggles themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:30 AM
0

The older I get, the more the term "skill issue" comes to my mind whenever I hear about the male loneliness epidemic. The reason for that is that I keep meeting men who - according to this subreddit - should be unsuccessful in dating and die alone getting married, having children and thriving.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 07:18 AM
4

Eh, I know a lot of men who literally bordered on homelessness, keeping themselves afloat with occasional gigs being successful with women. Given that they mostly spent their free time socialising. Ambition is certainly a positive to most women but there are plenty who don't really care about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 07:11 AM
2

Whoa there buddy, you don't get to seek transactional relationships and cheap out on your end. You want the billboard hoe, pay for the billboard hoe.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 11:08 PM
1

Jesus christ, buy a whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 09:03 PM
2

Is your definition of "overweight" and "fat" = morbidly obese?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 08:56 PM
2

The study is dogshit but no love is unconditional, never was, never will be. It's a pipe dream and people should get over it already.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 06:07 PM
1

Not always, people can lose their drive at any point even if their relationship is healthy. You can be a complete nympho and one day a medical perscription can kill your desire dead. So can work related stress, weight gain, self-image issues, aging or just growing lazy in the relationship. The problem is exactly that it might not be their partner's fault but it's their problem and if a couple can't figure it out then it will lead to resentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 03:19 PM
2

The exact amount of effort anyone should put into looking sexually desirable in public is 0. In relationships I think both partners should try to appeal to the other. Men should make room to spend quality time with their partner, going on dates, hikes or any activity withing the preferences of said partner. Women should also accomodate their male partners with their desires, within reason obviously. And no it's not mandatory, nobody is forcing you etc. I just think that a good partner tries to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 02:46 PM
1

They can. Shit, some guys would even prefer that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 02:19 PM
3

People with dead bedrooms would disagree on that. Good sex doesn't make a bad relationship good but bad sex ( or the lack of sexual interest) will absolutely sour an otherwise good, functional relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:51 PM
5

Nah, healthy people do that for their partners by their own volition. That goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:47 PM
1

I never understood that either. Like who gives the fuck. If i'm being honest I have more dislike towards people who do dress in a sexialised way in a public setting or workplace, it's trashy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:45 PM
10

Show me one fat woman that gets paid more in modeling than one that’s in shape. Moving the goalpost. We are talking about dating, not modelling. By modelling standards any woman under 6 ft would not make the cut. Show me one rich man that’s married to a fatty, and I’ll show you 10 more that are married to a skinny woman. Show me one trophy wife that married out of genuine attraction. That's right, you can't becouse these are inherently transactional relationships. So pretty much irrelevant to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 01:32 PM
2

What a terrible thing to take away from that interraction. Nah, bro dodged a bullet there. You shouldn't accomodate hoes like that unless you are fine being used as a meal ticket and having your relationship hinging on the condition of your wallet. People like that leave you to rot the moment the going gets tough. Do you honestly want someone like that? Have some self-respect, man.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:32 PM
3

And the funny thing is that he was framing this as a counter example wouldn't be representative on a general level. All the while the counter examples are all around and significally more common than people who fit his narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:12 PM
6

And the funny thing is that he was framing this as a counter example wouldn't be representative on a general level. All the while the counter examples are all around and significally more common than people who fit his narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:12 PM
7

Personally? Pretty much all of my friends but it depends on other qualities of said woman. On an objective level? Look at how many chubby chaser communities are out there. A lot of guys are into overweight women. In my gountry skinny girls are even shamed sometimes for being too thin.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 11:21 AM
8

Good news is that OP's rambling only applies to superficial, transactional relationships. When it comes to genuine attraction, women don't give a shit about money.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 11:17 AM
2

I'd argue that it's not the money, it's charisma if we are talking about genuine attraction, not transactional relationships. My reasoning: pattern recognition. I see broke guys with charisma get with girls on the regular. I myself got together with my current GF 6 years ago when I was overweight and broke. I've had friends who were bordering on homelessness that still pulled girls or were in long term relationships. One of my best friends is a small guy (about 5 ft), fat, broke and has girls in…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 11:06 AM
1

I called it the moment 4B hit mainstream. As much as we like to moralize issues, at the end of the day self-interest trumps everything else. It's not a coincidence that political and ideological affiliation almost always lines up with convinience and self-interest. It was easy to commit to 4B for women who were same-sex attracted or undesirable to begin with becouse they essentially had to change nothing. For everyone else it was predictable that they will fall back to their way of life, people …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:17 PM
7

Yeah I can't argue that men should take ownership of this issue. Especially seeing how many guys externalise this issue by blaming women for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 09:01 PM
37

Source: her ass. By the way, you should regard most weaponised statistics the same way. If a feminist tries to justify misandry with rubbish like this, kindly remind them that 90% of infanticide is commited by women.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/05/25 07:27 PM
25

Every feminist likes to say " that's not a true feminist" but none of them will actively contest blatantly sexist "feminist" takes. The reason why is that deep down they know that the loonies are running the asylum and will ostracize them and label them as pickmes for speaking up. That or they secretly agree with them, which honestly makes them just as much of a hypocrite radical sexist pos.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 09:44 AM
9

Saying that men should have reproductive rights and saying that sometimes men who abadon their children are justified.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 12:11 PM
-1

Depends. People who crave connection and rwlationships (not necessarily romantic) eventually seek it out and get better at socialising by talking with people. I think that saying mainly applies to older individuals (25+) who have no real desire to be around others and only see them as a means to an end. I think a lot of teens and young adults who are socially maladjusted just grow out of it. That's just my personal experience however.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 02:20 AM
1

Confirmation bias. You as a prostitute meet those men on the regular, you don't meet 99% of married dudes that don't do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:58 PM
20

Nobody grooms women into prostitution quite like other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 02:53 PM
3

Extreme opinions are never relyable. Very few rape accusations lead to court let alone convictions. It is very unlikely to happen but totally possible and has happened numerous times. False accusations ( of anything, not just rape) need a huge crackdown and the standard of evidence needs to be raised. My philosophy is that while far from ideal, a criminal potentionally running free for a time is preferable to an innocent person potentionally being punished for a crime they didn't do.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 06:53 PM
3

Not with that attitude
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 05:13 PM
0

A neutral woman doesn't have an effect on a person. So they are irrelevant in this conversation. Yes they do and I wrote my reasoning for that. Reading comprehension, dude. Funny you say I'm arguing in bad faith but you don't even read my argument, it's really telling. You are by saying that. By saying men fall to the red pill because women were indifferent to them. It directly takes away the negative experiences they had that lead them to red pill Like sorry but most failure in attracting women…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 03:37 PM
0

Holy projection, dude. First off, yes you did assume that. Re-read you own comment. You presented a reality where women exist in a binary system of either good or bad. Second, I'm not "blaming the victim" becouse they are men, I blame them becouse their problems are almost always self-inflicted. Yeah the real red pill is understanding that you have a direct involvment, resposibility, even in how attractive people percieve you and no, women not pity fucking these men are not "bad". There are men …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:19 PM
0

It does. You assume women are either good or bad in a man's life. While in reality most of them are indifferent to them. This indifference in itself can cause the frustration that ends up in swallowing the red pill, but indifference doesn't make women bad or a valid target to blame for someone's radicalisation. The root of the issue lies in the individual who allows himself to be radicalised by hateful rhetoric, often unprovoked. Your reply was a simple awnser to a complicated problem, not unlik…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 12:29 PM
2

It's a back and forth honestly, this sub radicalises both sexes into hating the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 12:17 PM
0

Damn a voice of reason, a rare sight to see around these parts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 12:08 PM
1

, Andrew Tate Tiktoks or more generally "manosphere" stuff is pretty much always a reaction to the real world rather than something that gets to men first and somehow blinds them to reality I mean... so is propaganda. The whole idea is talking an objective fact, magnify parts of it that align with the narrative and underplay/deny parts that don't. Succesfull propaganda has always used half-truths, not fake news. Why? The creators who perpetuate this message make a ton of money from it (despite n…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 12:02 PM
1

Sexism is an umbrella term. Misogyny is a specific term within of sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:55 AM
1

Problem is that most of these origin stories are rooted in personal failure and the projection of it. Source: been there, done that and it was a miserable state to be in.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:53 AM
0

I think you are looking at this in absolutes. Most people are indifferent to each other, some don't take that well but that doesn't make indifferent people bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:47 AM
4

I do genuinely think that most men get redpilled by teenage frustrations. That women don't throw themselves at them and that they can't reflect the success of their peers for whatever reason. Then not having that so called high school love is stuck as a thorn in their side. I don't think these guys genuinely tried more than a couple of times if at all. They just feel left out and then they find an outlet that tells them that it's not them who are wrong but women as a collective.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:44 AM
3

That's an intellectually dishonest question. People are not criticaly of TRP for the parts about self-improvement and you know it, everybody knows it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:28 AM
2

The manosphere did not come out of thin air. But it IS interesting how it (by extension, MGTOW, TRP, Incels) has an exact polar opposite in the form of feminism, FDS and 4B. An argument can be that those didn't come out of thin air either. I think all of this bullshit are just different manifestations of people projecting their individual failure to society at large. All are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:10 AM
5

Confirmation bias. You don't see men who succeeb whining about it. The internet is vast and even a relatively small group can seem massive in an echo chamber. It's actually one of the better tools of propaganda, skewing optics by presenting half truths. I'm pretty sure a 5 minute talk in person with people subscribing to TRP ideology would tell me exactly why they are failing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:01 AM
0

Both are idiotic points tbh. The guy being wrong doesn't make you right. Misoginy and misandry snowball off of each other. Propegating this retarded man v bear hyperbole does nothing except for creating more men that resent women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:13 AM
1

Indocrination, opinions rarely form from on-hand experience on anything really, especially abstract concepts. The reason TRP is so popular with young men is exactly that : lack of experience and the abundance of emotional immaturity. If somebody is trying to sell you the ultimate truth, the awnser to everything- they are scamming you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 10:11 AM
1

The internet causes radicalisation, not just for men but everyone. Most men and women hating the opposite sex don't have much experience in dating, maybe got grazed once and projected that one bad experience to the half of the population. Tho even in cases like the later I think forums like this one and Red Pill podcasts have a role to play, what is mild resentment can be escallated to full blown hatred. But I also think that it's not just these podcasters. The gender divide widens becouse they …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:37 AM
1

I totally understand veting, people are fucked up. When we were still just talking with my now GF she was very hesistant to meet up. We have been talking for 3 weeks before going to our first date what was essentially just spending the day together in the city. We were together for 3 years before moving in together. She told me that the reason for her caution was 2 weirdos that courted her before me. If anything I don't think people vet their partners well enough and rush things way too often. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 07:54 AM
1

OP casually brings up cheating with sexworkers as an example like it's not something to be looked down on and called out lmao. I think clientele of sex workers are rightfully shamed, so are sex workers. It's pathetic to visit whores and is telling of no self-control and a reckless, self-indulgent personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 11:56 AM
1

Uhuh okay , Tony Montana
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:05 PM
9

Your OF example is like saying that drug dealers are not the bad guys becouse they wouldn't exist without demand. True on paper but a completely backwards way of looking at adressing the issue. There will always be demand for even shit so depraved you wouldn't even believe but that does not morally justify the distributors. But to comment on your overarching point: yeah people project a lot, but that's not a male specific issue. In fact, women are just as guilty of engaging in it as men are. It'…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:32 PM
-2

I think you are looking at it from the wrong angle. Yeah most people make awfull partners, that doesn't mean they don't end up in relationships. Similarly, most parents are shit at parenting. It's just how it is. Sadly for these women, they are not as good as they think at veting the "worthy" ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 03:04 PM
1

Eh, I think it has diminishing returns. Size does matter to a certain lenght and girth, after that it's not that relevant. Having a micro penis must suck tho. I would be extremely insecure and I can absolutely see it break an otherwise good relationship. All in all, people are all somewhat superficial. The ones claiming otherwise tend to be more so than others. When it comes to penis size or boobs, even just even fat distribution, biology can be unfair and that unfairness can totally affect rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 07:35 AM
3

Similarly, marrying, dating, having sex with women doesn't exclude someone from being a misogynist. It's almost like dating preferences have little to do with bigotry. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:58 PM
5

As the saying goes: If a man builds a thousand bridges and sucks one cock, he will be called a cocksucker, not a bridge-builder.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:50 PM
3

Not wanting to fuck / date someone in itself is not "biphobia". The post is written in bad faith. People are allowed toset whatever bars they want for whatever reason they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 04:18 PM
2

Can't provide it right now but it goes by "The Dangerous Rise of Andrew Tate" the interviever is Matt Shea.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 01:13 PM
10

When Vice did the interviews and the reporter attended an IRL event there was no young men in sight, just middle aged weirdos and divorced dads. This was when he was at his peak in popularity btw.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/04/25 07:37 AM
0

Who knows maybe those wives don't have anything nice to be said about them? Let's keep up the same energy that OP likely has when one of the girlies describes her partner like a war criminal.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/25 12:08 PM
1

I think whatever the individual decides as reasonable qualifies as reasonable. People can raise the bar however high they want. They are entilted to that. That said I don't want to hear anyone crying for not getting someone who runs circles around them both in looks and lifestyle. You can set the bar but that doesn't make you able to reach it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 01:38 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that there are OF girls that essentially function as porn stars. They put up the content, people buy it. It's a one way transaction. I'm pretty sure sellers like that aren't as bothersome to most people. Then there are the invasive ones that promote their shit everywhere, exploit parasocial relationships to keep men on the hook and sell the promise of an easy life to teen girls, effectively grooming them to become e-whores. Ngl OF creators did everything in their power to piss pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 11:58 PM
1

Idk what religion has anything to do with this. People don't look down on prostitution becouse it's sinful. They look down on it becouse it's trashy, pathetic and a good way to get an STD.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:57 AM
1

Agree with the tiltle and disagree with everything else at large. Prostitution should be legalised becouse the alternative is worse for both the seller and the buyer. If that's not enough to convince you then it's also better for society at large. Less sex trafficing, less sex crimes, a regulated and taxed economy around sex work. It's also worth noting that prostitution will be perpetuated and present as long as humans are around so we might aswell regulate it to be less harmful than it needs t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 11:41 PM
2

Looking at women as a whole based on my personal experiences I don't see how you came to that conclusion. No matter if a woman was obese, unhygenic, butterface, had mantits or a pancake ass, there would always be someone pursuing them romantically. There are plenty of men who are into all different kinds of women. Now, those men may not be top-shelf quality either but they are out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 09:13 AM
2

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 11:53 PM
–

I know i'm the last person to speak for women here as a dude approaching 30 but I'm gonna take a leap and assume that a past involving visiting sex workers is a dealbreaker for 99% of women. Like, significantly more so that actually being a sex worker is to men. You can call it stigma but let's look at some facts what this lifestyle tells potentian future partners about you on a surface level. You don't value sex as sacred or something to be shared exclusively betwen people with at the very leas…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 09:16 PM
3

Funny when these complaints come from people who don't even consume this media. I'm not an ecchi enjoyer, I'm not even an anime fan. There is a few I have a passing interest in like JoJo, Baki, Chainsaw man, Berserk but these are few and far betwen. In the end of the day, ecchi and even hentai are fictional and feature drawings only. They don't cause any tangible harm to anyone, in this aspect it's cleaner than actual porn featuring real life actors who often face abuse in the industry. Are they…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 11:52 AM
1

I did. They are out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 11:01 PM
4

*and women
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 11:00 PM
38

You didn't hear it from me but the tooth fairy doesn't exist either. Whenever ai hear someone seeking "unconditional" love I'll just assume they have the emotional maturity of a toddler and no real comprehension of functional relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 10:58 PM
26

Mind you that this is only crime statistics. Reported cases. Fake accusations largely happen without involvement from the legal system. Ruining families, friendships, employment status without a trace in statistics. Honestly, false accusers can rot in hell. Not only do they fuck with innocent individuals they are also making the legal proccessfor actual victims a lot harder than it should be.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 06:16 PM
2

I don't feel offended at all, knock yourself out. I don't view images like that as some unrealistic standard I have to live up to. We had plenty of sex icons both male and female for thousands of years. I think that it's natural.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 01:37 AM
–

Everything you said was utterly outdated and out of touch with modern reality. And no man is going to listen to you if they're not approaching women already. Hate break it to you they already are. Have been for a thousands of years. It's not the matter of listening to me, it's objective reality. Yes it is outdated and unlike the rest of the animal kingdom we built rockets. We're unique and we have a pattern of breaking gender norms. You are in for a grim suprise if you think humanity is beyond p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 07:33 PM
2

Yeah that's what I was thinking until I attended uni when the man v bear thing was fresh and heard girls spitting the most misandrist hateful shit imaginable, in person while in class. With me as the only, guy in the classroom btw, absolutely shamelessly. Tho the ratio of men and women in this major is 1 to 10 so it's expected that female locker room talk gets into casual conversation. Anyway I did add my 2 cents to the conversation. Some where open to see reason and one got told that she is ret…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 01:01 PM
4

You got it backwards, sister. In fact a lot of casual misandry just gets a pass while misoginy gets people cancelled. Besides it doesn't matter. Sexism is sexism and all forms of it are equally trashy and disgusting. Neither misoginy nor misandry are justifiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:30 PM
2

To your first point: it's not outdated, it can't be outdated. It's a perpetually consistent pattern across almost all species. I would start getting comfortable with the idea that it's not going to change in your lifetime, if ever. I'm suprised that it's only 40% who haven't been approached by women. To your 2nd point: the amount of men needed to keep the population going with a passable gene diversity is about 1 man for 5 women. Biology is sexist and sperm really is cheap while eggs are expensi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 11:15 AM
3

Usually sluts have no issue getting into long term relationships. Despite some people wishing to pretend otherwise, this is the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 06:49 PM
12

Women you defined as "low standard" seem to have no issues getting into relationships. Now, the quality of those relationships may not be the best but it shows that there are plenty of men with standards they fit into. Flip the script and men in similar situations will have a lot harder time finding women with standards low enough to date them. Not saying that it's a good or a bad thing. It's just how it is. Sidenote: slut is a weird inclusion becouse it already implies that someone is desireabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 02:47 PM
0

Don't forget to mention that threatening somebody's safety is against the law and you get criminally prosecuted if you are breaking it. People are absolutely entilted to safety. Also you say that safety is just the side effect of an advanced society... brother why do you think some animals move in packs and herds? Safety and shared resources. Safety is not a side-effect, it's the bedrock of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 03:01 PM
2

I commented that directly after seeing 3 different women commenting shit like that in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 02:57 PM
4

Your delusions of grandeur won't make your deranged babling reality either.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 09:21 AM
7

Provided by law enforcement, consisting of both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 09:06 AM
2

Uhuh, for sure man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 09:04 AM
5

It's called the LAW. Literally every developed country has laws against assault, murder, rape, etc. Do they still happen? Sure, but criminal punishment is an effective deterent for most people. Society has no tolerance for these crimes and people who threaten the safety of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 09:01 AM
8

Good thing we are no longer live by the laws of nature for a couple thousand years now then.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 03:07 AM
4

Yes they both do, under the relative safety of modern society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 02:52 AM
13

Holy fucking shit I'm in hell. Some women are also delulu thinking they are completely fending for themselves like they are out in a rainforest. People need to get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 01:39 AM
13

Literally never heard that one before. Whoever made that up must be retarded. Everyone is entilted to safety, like it's one of the foundations of a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/25 12:39 AM
1

First of all, false. Men as the proactive party in courting are hardcoded to "provide validation" to women, there was an aboundance of it since the primal days. Second, I think the digital age made everyone stuck in the comfort zone. For men this is a problem becouse one of the main ways of building character was going out interracting with people and solving problems, getting shit done. Now, most things are sorted out, social interaction is much more limited than it used to be. Don't think for …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 04:04 PM
-2

Then everyone clapped. The picture you are painting is cartoonish.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 02:21 PM
1

How is this fetishizing? Why would I care? Is having a type a fetish now? If it was then why would I feel off about it? This sounds like something a Karen came up with. In the end of the day people can decide what type of partner they are looking for, even if it significantly limits their dating pool. In the given example I'd be reasured that physical attraction is checked at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 01:59 PM
4

The men who hit her up are probably looking for a love based relationship, not a sugar baby - sugar daddy arrangement. She is looking to be a sugar baby but isn't honest with herself about that. So it's a miscommunication. If you are looking at this from the perspective of someone who is looking for partnership she sounds entiltled af. That said it's ok if she wants to be a luxury escort /sugar baby/ trophy wife, I'd imagine a lot of girls are after that lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 01:43 PM
–

Yet you are not saying that "men are a bigger issue but both are equally bad" you are only singling out men as a group. So yeah it does kind of imply that you don't see these women as an issue at all. Especially considering that in your worldview these women directly support a literal rapist, but you don't feel the need to call them out for essentially throwing other women under the bus. What this tells me is that you are grasping at straws and try to rationalise trashing on men. There is no big…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:47 AM
–

Girl, are you aware that women also voted for the Orange man, right? More importantly it seems like a lot of women also failed to show up for the Girlboss. Interesting. To me it seems like a lot of women find little to no issue with Trump's charges. An election's worth at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:07 AM
–

If your audience regularly misinterprets your message and feels attacked then maybe it's time to consider that you might not convey your message as well as you think you do. There were decades of civil rights and feminist discussion about common issues with nowhere near the pushback you see nowadays. Maybe it's not the audience that became more narcisitic, racist, sexist or whatever, maybe it's the speakers who got shittier and preachier.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 02:56 AM
–

Systematic issues: antagonisation of men in media, harsher sentences, neglegence of male victims of female-perpetrated crime, this whole idea of the original sin imposed on men on a categorical level, lack of support spaces for men, men's lives being regarded as less valuable than womens' and of course no reproductive rights. Issues on the individual level: men expected to suck everything up, men expected to take initiative, men expected to earn their keep, abuse against men is still made fun of…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 02:45 AM
–

been threatened with the illusion of loosing power by offering equality to woman. If you think this is what frustrates men you are so far out of touch there is nothing I can say to change your mind. Doesn’t correlate: black people - been through hundreds of years of suppression. Hate speech is hate speech. You can justify it all you want but in the end of the day misandry will only cause men to oppose you and everything you stand for.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 12:11 AM
–

Why is it hard for you to realise that making sweeping statements does, in fact target the good guys. If you were making generalising statements about any other group you would get banned in a nanosecond from the entire website. Before you talk shit about men switch the word "men" with "black people". If it doesn't sound racist as fuck then you are good to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:29 PM
–

I also don't think all critique of male behaviour is misandrist Not if you are not projecting the negative behavior of a few individuals to the whole group. I mean look around just here. Some women are deranged enough to think that every man hides a rapist friend in his closet.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 10:09 PM
–

Men like Harvey, Jeffrey, jimmy and Andrew All of their direct orbiters took part in the abuse. Are you suggesting that any reasonable average Joe was around these people? Mind you these are serial rapists with double digit victims under their belt. You are like halfway to understanding the real picture to be concluded from these examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:03 PM
2

I know You missed the point at the start. Rapists are criminally prosecuted and seen as scum of the earth by everyone. Rapists and abusers don't advertise themselves as such. You can hate on men for being poor judge of character all you want but the fact that these animals get in the graces of women in the first place proves that women misjudge them all the same. Maybe you should hate the deciever instead of the decieved. How about growing up an realising that it's not men vs women, it's men AND…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 07:26 PM
1

Birds of a feather fly together. It perfectly checks out that men who don't find sexual harassment acceptable hang in different crowds than rapists. Even if they somehow end up in the same group rape isn't exactly something the criminal advertises, they are aware that most normal people will crucify them if they are found out. Also, rapists are almost always repeat-offenders. Math does math if you spend 1 minute thinking about it. Men bad is not always the awnser, no matter how badly you want it…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 06:36 PM
9

A few months ago a female nurse has been found out to have broken the bones of infant boys for YEARS out of hatred for men. One of the fathers of these children refused to hold his own baby after noticing the injury out of fear of being framed for it. To put this in context: a NURSE has been BREAKING THE BONES of INFANTS for YEARS without being found out or even questioned. Systematic misandry at work. You can hold ignorant views like "misandry is harmless" only as long as you don't look into it…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 06:30 PM
1

You are projecting. You need therapy, not a debate forum.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 06:13 PM
2

Then why do you exist? Mind elaborating? Our 6th anniversary is coming up in a week with my partner. What are we all doing here if everyone gets with everyone at same level? Bitching, moaning and projecting personal failure on to the world for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 05:19 PM
–

*reported crimes. Here, fixed your shit. and who is the attacker of this men in the majority? Criminals and low lives. Both are gender neutral terms. Try again, misandrist
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 05:16 PM
5

Men are the main victims of violent crime. Try again
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 05:04 PM
2

Inceldom is a cope for lazy, self-loathing men. Not a legitimate condition
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:48 PM
1

Bait was too obvious, you get us next time chief.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 04:46 PM
5

Idk who made that up but unconditional love is a fairy tale.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 01:19 PM
2

One of my friends was lead on for 2+ years and got out of the situation recently. To preface it, he was really stupid and should have listened to his boys before things got as bad as they did. So he's the same age as me, 26 the woman in question is 32, they met when the guy was 24 and she was 30. Bit of an age-gap but nothing wrong with that. The problem started when she started to keep him at arm's lenght. Obviously, the guy was madly in love with her and abstained from any other kind of romant…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:56 AM
4

I used to have a lot of female friends and I was part of several friend groups that mainly consisted of women. Let me share some of my experiences. Women friend groups put Game of Thrones to shame with the amount of scheming, backstabbing and shittalking No sense of comraderie or mutual respect. If you are a guy, you are subhuman or a god depending on how much you supposed platonic friends are attracted to you. you are perpetually gossiped about, down to aspects of your personal life that's none…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:23 AM
0

If there was a pill I could pop in and never worry about it with minimal impact to my physical and mental health, I would take it in a heartbeat. Turns out it's a lot easier to kill one egg than thousands of sperm cells. At least via a pill. Tho this still wouldn't adress the problem to what paper abortions propose a solution to. If this hypothetical male birth control pill had just 1% rate of failure that would still leave us at the place where in case of failure the final decision comes down t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:36 PM
0

What an ignorant take.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 08:42 PM
2

Stats released by the company that wants to keep desperate people on the hook don't mean shit to me. I'm giving way more credibility to actual tangible evidence that I've seen first hand troughout the years. We agree to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 07:50 PM
1

Becouse more people use it for casual sex and FWB than LTR. If you want to get technicaly the correct category would be "self-validation app that can be used to arrange hookups and sometimes dates" in terms of how the userbase treats it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 07:46 PM
1

I think the reasurment aspect that a lot of people find them attractive without any necessary personal interaction. Probably someone who uses these apps as a confidence booster could give you a better awnser to that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 06:22 PM
1

People are not that one dimensional. Someone can use Tinder for validation, casual sex and looking for a long term partner aswell over long time usage of the app.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:47 PM
4

I personally met my current GF on Badoo 6 years ago. So I can only go by what I see with my single friends do on Tinder and Bumble. The awnser is a lot of people and another fun fact is that a lot of the times it's the woman who suggests meeting up for sex. It's not as outlandish as you would think.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:43 PM
2

You said that it's a rarity in heterosexual dating apps, which is simply not true. You specifically namedropped Tinder, an app notorius from it's hookup culture. It's also the most popular one besides Bumble. Might be a hard pill to swallow but a massive amount of women take part in hookup culture and they can be found pretty much everywhere anywhere. Including these hookup apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:22 PM
10

Oh sure, no doubt about that. People also use it as a form of validation with no interest to ever meet up or even talk to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:19 PM
24

If you think women don't use Tinder for hookups then you are completely out of touch.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 12:52 PM
1

You may not like it but we engage in performative behavior to acconodate others basically everywhere. A meek, socially inept and introverted man will fail at most aspects of life, not just dating. You don't have to be dominant or insufferable but you need to be confident and taking initiative. The world will not accomodate you, you will not be handed anything, if you want something you need to get it for yourself. Our persona is not a monolith, it develops dynamicly troughout our entire life. Ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:04 AM
19

The woman who wrote this lives a more priviliged life than 99.9999% of humans in history. Just something to ponder.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/25 08:51 PM
1

Being a gentlemen is not being a food dispenser. For me a gentleman is a man who takes care of himself properly, treats everyone with respect, has manners, is humble, has his own ideals and stands by them, someone who always takes the high road when confronted. We can also add that a gentleman doesn't have to accomodate others' opinions on what a gentleman is. That said I'm not a gentleman. I'm a petty fuck who believes that if someone wrongs me then I have a moral obligation to return it tenfol…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 05:30 PM
-1

The one thing I don't understand is why women with no intention to violate somebody like that go on the defensive for these rapists all the time. Like you are allowed to condemn this behavior without taking personal accountability for it. Unless they see it as a completely acceptable thing to do. The idea that this is widely validated by women is genuinely fucking me up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 04:17 PM
8

Why is it a given that men would do sex work if they could? I wouldn’t. I don't get that part either. Men can do sex work, gay sex work specifically and they do. Even straight dudes, gay for pay is absolutely a thing. Can't imagine a woman wanting to touch someone with that kind of history with a 10ft pole tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 02:38 PM
1

First off, calling anyone "damaged goods" is dehumanising so I clearly don't stand for that. Now that this is out of the way, being a sex worker is heavily indicative of other personal issues that would make someone a bad long-term partner. To mention a few, normal people don't have a desire to have sex with strangers (or do sexual performance) for money. It's a self-destructive lifestyle. You may not agree but a lot of people also view sex as sacred, something to be shared intimately with a lov…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 02:29 PM
–

you can't speculate that all of them I didn't. Not all of them but a lot of them. This isn't a rare situation. Many of them lie that they want it and then vanish. Many of them leave for totally unrelated reasons, like for a mistress for example. Thanks for stating the obvious. These are completely different situations than what we are talking about. Obviously I have no empathy for men who decive their partners with the promises of stability then leave them after the child is born. Maybe you shou…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 10:17 AM
–

Who is violating your autonomy? Sabotaged birth control that can be both poking holes into condom or "forgeting" to take the pill without mentioning it are common examples of violation on men's consent and autonomy. Purposefully getting pregnant from a man who doesn't want kids in any way, for any reason is a violation of autonomy. If you want to tolerate to be violated, you do you but a lot people won't. Nobody can force you to have a child in places where abortion is legal. If you get pregnant…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 06:34 PM
1

You confuse Gen Z with millenials. It's mainly millenials who engage in this trash behavior acting like hall monitors of the world. Don't get me wrong. My generating is retarded but what you described hails from a different group of retards.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:39 PM
3

Agreed, just be yourself is the worst advice ever in any context imaginable. Even if we look past self improvement, our social structure is built on performative behaviors. To thrive in pretty much anything you need to recognise that and play along.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:19 PM
–

In case it wasn't obvious I was refering to biological parenthood, not a parental role. Also no, I don't lol if someone tried to violate my autonomy to that extent I would go any lenght to get out of it. Even if that includes migrating to the rearest place where that legal obligation can't be enforced on me. Now, I would be a lot happier if I didn't have to do that but as things stand that's how it would go down. I do not have the right or the will to force anyone have a child with me then pay f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:03 PM
–

That’s nonsense. Both parents contributed to conception. If men don’t want child support obligations, they should push for legal financial abortion before birth—not just "dipping out" after. Yes that's what I said. Glad to get that across. A fair system isn’t one where only women bear consequences. You don’t want "equality"; you want a loophole for men to abandon their kids. You confuse the chicken with the egg. Men's end goal is not to abandon their kids. Their goal is not to be forced to finan…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:46 PM
–

Nah the men are responsible to wear protection. What we are talking about is past that point of prevention, dummy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:07 PM
–

Even if I did it would be skewed just by the nature of the subject matter. This isn't something people blatantly admit to. But it's obvious that it happens, it's common sense. What do you think all the absent fathers were thrilled about fatherhood? Please just think about this critically for one minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:04 PM
–

Therefore, that reckless pregnancy was caused by them. They are the acting force, the agent, but are mad that their sperm does what they sent it out into the world to do. Way to infantilise adult women as if they are a passive recipent of sex who don't get to schoose who they sleep with or how they protect themselves from unwanted pregnancy. Absolutely deranged take.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 03:12 PM
2

one affects the body and the other doesn’t. With what then, do you use to produce the finances required to be paid, my guy? It doest affect the m Body directly , sure it's a technicality. You are still going to use your body for labor in order to fulfill what you are legally obligated to do. A man walking away from his child does. That is correct if he diped after consenting to parenthood and the child is already born. If a woman decided to keep the pregnancy despite the wishes of the father the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 02:26 PM
1

I know and I agree. I would consider abortion over having a child with an unwilling co-parent a responsible choice too. A child deserves two loving parents, continuing the pergnancy fully aware that this condition will not be met is bordering on immorality and selfishness in my books.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 02:00 PM
1

Yes the world may not necessarily be fair to men when it comes to child support in all cases out there, but instead of promoting absent parents we should lobby for better legal workarounds for men that involve not completely abandoning your own kids and avoiding any responsibilities that come with a child. Having a reward structure around single parenthood is quite literally promoting single parenthood as a lifestyle. The reason we have so many absent fathers is that the law is one sided on this…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 01:40 PM
1

It's funny to call abortion an act of responsibility. any woman who has access to abortion can decide not to have a kid, thereby not suffering the horrible unwanted consequences of sex. Being responsible is not "suffering cosequences". Being responsible is making decisions that result in the best possible outcome for everyone involved. Example: you can't afford a child but ended up with an unwanted pregnancy. If you don't have the means to provide for the child and to meet it's needs then the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 01:23 PM
5

If you really believe men should have more reproductive rights, fight for things like early ‘financial abortions’—but don’t use that as an excuse to run from responsibility. You could make the same argument for abortions. You can twist an rephrase it as "running away from reponsibility" but that doesn't make it true. Most of the times not having a child is the most responsible choice someone can make. This is also why it would be important to give men the oportunity to completely sever themselve…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 01:09 PM
1

The only answer is that some men are assholes who only care about their legacy. But the same could be said about women who keep unwanted pregnancies against their partner's wishes. Which happens a lot. Their desire to have a minime completely overwrites the father's autonomy in their heads. Somehow I don't see reckless procreation get nearly as much hate than the men refusing to put up with it. Kids are expensive and if you don’t wanna pay for it, don’t have it. The woman get's to choose if the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 12:31 PM
2

Men who have a problem with paying for kids they didn't consent (consent to sex is not consent to parenthood) or choose to have are valid. It's fucked up that there is no out for men who don't wish to be in that position and that their partner can just disregard that with the legal system behind their back. It's problematic for the same reason you would find denying the availability of abortion problematic. It's a violation of autonomy. Men who consent to parenthood and try to pull a 180 when th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 12:17 PM
0

You can't fake confidence, it's not something you can magicaly develop. You can tho. I went from social inept who gets panic attacks on public transportation to being able to get along with pretty much any stranger I meet in like 3 years. So what did I do in those 3 years? Talking with people a lot both as part of my job and my free time. Crazy, I know but talking to people caues you to get better at talking with people. The excuse that charisma is not learnable / developable is pure cope and a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:30 AM
13

Most people have no idea. Yeah becouse gay men are relatively rare compared to lesbian women. They are not as bold as them stating these opinions either becouse misandry is tolerated and encouraged while misogyny gets you burned at the stake, gay or not.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/25 07:51 PM
–

Going with the analogy, I'd say that it would be worth looking into timeless techniques that were always effective at catching fish. For an example, picking a good spot, you want to fish where the fish are. You need an understanding what attracts the fish to bite, so on. That said, women are not fish and attracting them is tangled up in complex social layers. You are right that some tips just don't work out for certain people. There are however timeless practices that are broader in scope. take …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 07:49 PM
1

Male romantic loneliness is due to women not putting up with shitty behavior anymore This is just pure cope. People often overlook observable and apparent patterns to soothe themselves into a sense of cosmic and societal justice that alligns with their world view. Even if it's false. The awnser to this phenomenon is complicated and as OP mentioned it rarely affects problematic individuals. The people it affects are the ones at the bottom of the social foodchain. Much of it undeniably comes from …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 04:09 PM
0

Damn, you sure showed me. Totally owned. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:35 PM
3

Not liking a person and not wanting to fuck or date a person are concepts you guys are confusing in an alarming rate. You want to rationalise rejection with hate? Sure, go ahead but normal people will go on and date who they want, not who they are allowed to want by the sex police.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:32 PM
2

Wrong thread bro
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:29 PM
2

Becouse it's a catch-22. You already assumed disgust towards the woman being jewish. You don't have to be disgusted of someone to not want to fuck them. That's why. You get an awnser when you stop arguing in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 08:19 PM
4

That's the thing, mate. You can be as picky as you want when veting partners. If you don't want to date jewish people, you can just not date jewish people without sieging that heil or subscribing to any antisemitic ideology. I bet there are a lot of people who wouldn't sleep with someone if they found out they have opposing views in politics, doesn't make them a political extremist. Crazy I know but if a white person doesn't want to date black people(or vice versa), that doesn't make them a raci…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 07:34 PM
1

Someone can be homophobic and refuse to date bi men becouse of that. Not wanting to date bi men is not homophobic on it's own.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 06:12 PM
2

Nope, it's not. Not wanting to date people from a certain religious or ethnic background is also valid. If you think jews deserve less rights, dehumanise them, discriminate them, promote hate towards them based on them being a jew then you are an antisemite. Not wanting to date a jew doesn't make you an antisemite. You can put whatever barriers you want for who you allow in your bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 06:11 PM
6

Dayum he actually doubled down. You are insane but at least respectable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 05:54 PM
7

Sad
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 05:53 PM
4

No is a complete sentence. People are allowed to vet their partners however the fuck they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 05:52 PM
5

Some of my friends used to be completely fine with their gf's messing around with other women. Not out of hope for participation or fetishization, they were just genuinely unbothered by it. I think men just don't feel as threathened by same-sex attention their partners may recieve. Even if fears like that wouldn't exatly be unfounded. It's a common pattern that bi women break up with their boyfriend for a one way ticket to Lesbos.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 05:50 PM
5

Why don't men harbor this same fear for bi women? women can please another woman the way no man can (or at least that's what I hear) Becouse generally men don't feel threatened by a woman being interested in their partner. Some are even into it. Even if fears like that wouldn't exactly be unfounded. If I had a nickel for every time I've seen a bi woman breaking up with their boyfriend for a one way ticket to lesbos, I'd have like 5 nickels. Which doesn't seem much but I've known about that much …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 05:32 PM
9

100%. I also had friends who didn't mind their gf's hooking up with other women, as long as they are women. They just didn't view it as something threatening to their relationship. And ngl if my gf came up to me with an arangement like that I would view it as negotiable but not preferable. However if the 3rd party was a man I'd break up on the spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:50 PM
4

Not wanting to fuck or be with someone for any reason whatsoever doesn't make you a phobe of anything. We had the same dance with trans people who cried transphobia on everyone who didn't want to fuck them. The world doesn't work like that. What, next time I'll be the homophobe for not wanting to suck a guy off as a stright man? Get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:42 PM
3

Not wanting to fuck or be with someone for any reason whatsoever is not a phobia. People who don't want to date bi men are valid. No amount of shaming will cause them to change their mind. This is the same exact dance we had a couple of years ago with trans people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:25 PM
14

The men who tell you that are retarded and chronically online. Men in the real word don't think like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:16 PM
1

I knida see where they are coming from tbh. I don't think it's straight up homophobia, more like an insecurity that the man they are with will forver long for dick or even cheat with a man. Which I suppose is emberassing to the woman. Men are not really insecure about bi women, they don't see lesbian tendency in their partner as a potential threat to the relationship, some are even into it. Funny thing is that I'm willing to bet a lot more bi women break off their straight relationships to explo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 04:00 PM
-1

I think it's about time to clean house in the sub. Recent posts have been drailing from men's rights to spite towards feminists / women. This may be a handful of extremists or larpers it doesn't matter. If we don't hold bad actors accountable they will be the representation of men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 11:05 AM
2

amount of me that still downplay and mock women that get sexually assaulted is very very high, they just also whine about women needing to be held accountable and play victim. Behavior like that will get you fired from most workplaces and ostracized from most social circles. People holding that opinion are not open about it and voice it specifically in spaces where they can't be orstracized for it. That tells me that people who hold views like that are held accountable, it's not tolerated by soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 02:54 PM
1

Yeah, people are just generally shit at taking accountability. The main source of resentment is that men are held accountable a lot more than women are imo. That said, when given the oportunity men will act just as unaccountably.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:59 PM
2

I kinda disagree. While it's true that a lot of men who say women have no accountability are avoiding accountability by blaming women ironicaly enough. What is also true is the fact that men in society are held accountable a lot more than women are for the same behaviors. The clear cut example are DV and sexual violence. Not only that women get away with them a lot more frequently, somehow it's still a topic of debate if they are even capable of these acts. Even worse, sometimes they are validat…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:56 PM
1

So to preface this I think everyone should take more accountability for themselves not just women. A lot of guys here could use a bit of self-reflection regarding their dating success. So what people mean by taking accountability is recognising one's mistakes that may have lead to a bad situation they are in, then not making that mistake again. Instead of that, people tend to project their part of the problem to the external world. It's easy to foster victim mentality, you get to pretend that yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 10:00 AM
1

I wouldn't necessarily equate the hub's statistics with society at large. Correct me if i'm wrong but for them to be able to poll that data I think they only take registered accounts into count. If that's the case then that excludes 99% of their traffic. I'll make a leap here and say that roughly the same amount of men and women are into more hardcore stuff. That said rapeplay is quite different from most categories as rape itself is a massive taboo in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 03:32 AM
46

From an early age men are told that one of the worst things they can do is force themselves on a woman. It's conditioning, if you are told that something is terrible and that idea has been repeatedly reinforced in you for decades then it will be outside of your comfort zone. Besides, rapists get off on the idea of their victim not wanting the experience. For a man who doesn't have rapist tendencies seeing their partner struggle and acting like they want them to stop is a huge turn off. Third and…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 11:44 PM
2

To be fair she should be in a psychiatric ward, not prison. She is clearly mentally disturbed.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:01 PM
15

That poor guy jesus fucking christ. I hope when the next time that human trash ex raises her hand at someone the recipient will be just as much of a psycho as she is. These fucking animals are among us, it's terrifying.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 07:58 AM
4

I think the only problem with it is the hypocrisy. Even men make small dick jokes time to time, even as self-depricating humor. The difference is the people who unironically use small dick energy as an insult would go feral if a woman was bodyshamed in response to a bad opinion. It's also intent, it's an insult aiming at a deeply personal insecurity one is born with. So the inverse would go something like this: Woman: shares opinion Men: Oh wow, if you have a flat chest and an Arby's roast beef …
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:17 AM
6

Sexism is sexism. We are tolerant to none it or all of it. There is no room for compromise and nouance. Once you start to cherry pick and validate some instances of it you arrive at an Orwell-esque "everyone is equal but some are more equal than others" type of deal. The OG civil rights activists would spit on these people.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/25 04:10 PM
3

Eh, he was going on rants about sexploitation movies a couple of times despite bulding a career on top of them. He's a hypocrite.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/25 09:47 AM
1

I don't really like to assume malicious intent based on that. Most people just have a skewed unrealistic idealised picture in their head about romantic relationships likely fostered from different media outlets. This isn't that much different than women still holding out for Prince Charming to finally pick them and rescue them from mediocrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 02:46 AM
6

Reads like bait ngl. The fact she even points out that she got called out on it is really telling.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/25 09:19 PM
3

If we looked at a spectrum of revealing clothing choices ranging from a form fitting turleneck with no bra to Bianca Censori then I'm pretty sure most men are okay with whatever until about the halfway point of that spectrum. After that there are trashy fashion choices such as wearing BDSM/fetish gear in public, sheer tops that fully exposes the chest etc. You can wear revealing clothes tastefully but it's easy to overdo it and fall into the trashy category. Trashy is not a category men go for i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:56 PM
–

That is statistically incorrect. You don't even need statistics to figure out what you said is the most detached, out of touch, pure stupidity prabably in the history of this forum and that says a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 11:19 AM
–

It's not. It's a bad argument. There are shitty people everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 10:01 AM
–

I don't think it's as rare as people make it out to be. I think most of you are looking for the wrong types of women for relationships or just jump to conclusions based on what you see on the internet. There is also a massive difference betwen "valuing what you provide" and wanting to date a functional adult who can take care of himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:58 AM
11

Remember to stay the fuck away from women who deny female on male violence. They might not be perpetrating it themselves but they are condoning it. It's a red flag.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/02/25 01:31 AM
1

I'm sure the person who came up with this is a well balanced individual in a happy relationship and they are on very good terms with their father aswell.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 09:54 AM
10

They are in for a shock when they find out how many soccer moms would dehumanise them if they found out they had a C section instead of "real birth". That same moms also go feral whenever a young woman tells them that they are child-free. Tho I love how they pretend that women treat each other nicely all the time and men are always apathetic. What makes men apathetic towards women are posts like this.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/02/25 07:16 PM
3

Men are pestered to get a real job. Reasonable given that they don't have one and are not in education or training. Women pestered to get married Men are aswell.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 07:59 AM
10

Speak for yourself, me and my friends in our late 20's can't catch a break from family members pestering us about kids. You tell them you don't want any? Awsers range from " you'll come around" to "well it's not just your choice, is it?". Like fucking hell, IF I CHOOSE to have kids, i'll have kids but this invasive behavior is fucking pathetic. People LOVE to obsess over kids they are not actually responsible for raising. Point is, men get this shit aswell. Childless middle-aged men are seen as …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 01:40 AM
2

Holy reddit. I guess I've found a live one.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/25 11:54 PM
1

Okay then manifest the grown up version of unsuccessfull self-loathing inept into the place of that word. At least you enjoy tone policing strangers on the internet. That's what mature adults do right?
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/25 10:42 PM
12

Everywhere. Honestly I couldn't name a single group I've met who didn't have it's dedicated self-pitying loser. Not a single class, not a single workplace or online group. They are quite literally everywhere as it is the most common human behavioral pattern to externalise personal problems.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/25 09:55 PM
18

Let's be real there are tons of these people for both genders.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/25 08:52 PM
–

there is not "systemic misandry" There is a lot of systematic misandry. Just as usual they are barely recognised and swept under the rug.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 05:25 PM
–

I still blame the success of Tate on the years of anti-male rhetoric platformed by mainstream media. Turns out if you subject people to years of listening to how bad they are on a categorical level then some of them will grow to live up to that expectation. But you never learn, do you? You keep spitting the same venom that causes men like Tate to suceed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 05:20 PM
–

Yes it does. You tolerate all forms of hatred or none of it. If you make exceptions, you create a breeding ground for hate which will always create a counter group. You get back to square one real fucking quick. Besides despite what the narrative says, misandrist are dangerous and not to be underestimated. Like the nurse who broke the bones of several infant boys in a hospital out of hatred for men. FOR YEARS. https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/08/us/virginia-nurse-erin-strotman-arrest-cec/index.html T…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 05:06 PM
3

Then I don't agree with that assertion and I may or may not find it straight up retarded. Unconditional love is not a thing, never was. People who claim to love unconditionally are just not creative enough about certain unspoken conditions. The lack of awareness for those conditions doesn't mean that they are not there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:14 PM
0

Funny you presented this issue in such a one-sided way becouse literally the only people I heard craving "unconditional love" are women. Most men are very much aware that love is 100% conditional.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:23 PM
3

Sometimes I wonder if these posts come from legitimately disturbed individuals or grifters who try to portray men's rights as unhinged by posting shit like this.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 11:20 PM
-11

This sub is starting to spiral, please stay reasonable.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 11:26 AM
1

Why do you expect feminism to advocate for men’s issues much in the first place? Becouse they claim to stand for gender equality and social justice not female supremacy. Part of justice and equality is surrendering privilages for the common good. Do men’s rights activists advocate for women? Yes they do. Most MRAs are pro-choice and want women to have access to abortions. As well as they want men to have the option to surrender parental rights and obligations. You guys have extremely unrealistic…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:51 PM
3

Both genders tend to shift personal accountability by projecting fault to the opposite sex. It's loser mentality. Shitty women absolutely create misogyistic men and shitty men create misandrist women. This doesn't mean that misandry or misoginy are justifiable and healthy attitudes to have. If you have resentment toward the opposite sex then sorry to say but you are the one who has a problem that needs to be fixed. The entiltlement is fucking WILD on both sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 07:24 PM
25

Would you trust the safety of your infant child to a Golden Retriever or a random woman? Statistically the woman is way more likely to kill the child. It's that easy to weaponise data to push a narrative. Extremely effective to create division and for spreading hate. It's everything but constructive.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 03:37 PM
0

Many young men struggle becouse they externalize internal issues
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 01:01 PM
1

It's like you're not even reading what I said so I won't gratify you with a proper reply. You aready set your mind on hating men and only you can change that, misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 09:12 PM
3

The distinction betwen peaceful and harmless is important. I promise you that everyone, including women will gladly engage in shitty behavior when they are enabled to and the recieving party is unable to defend themselves. Suddenly when they are no longer harmless they abuse the shit out of others. Absolute rat behavior Source: Worked costumer service for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:37 PM
1

Women dont commit those acts at the same rate, at all, and there is a huge difference. Men commit 99% of those last time I checked. Data is incomplete and skewed. It's not hard to lead in rape when some places don't even recognise female on male rape as rape. Male victims are also known to under report abuse and being neglected by law enforcement when they do report. But it's good you bought this up regardless. It goes to show how much empathy goes towards female victims and male victims of abus…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 04:50 PM
1

Spreads hateful misandristic rhetoric against men not to bash men tho UwU it's just objective reality Cringe. Please post again if you bring constructive arguments to the table
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 04:10 PM
1

Everyone is entilted to set whatever standards they want with choosing partners tbh. Just don't hate on the opposite sex if your preferences narrowed down your dating pool to a dating glass of water. I don't see how this could "backfire". Like, it's not an own to refuse dating losers. It's something you should do for yourself baseline. It's pretty sad if you need that to be told to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 03:51 PM
6

Bait used to be believable
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 03:27 PM
5

To awnser all of your questions: no. I also don't delude myself into thinking newage feminism is about equal rights. If it was then it would have lost relevancy decades ago as a movement as most people fit into that definition of a feminist. The reason why a lot of guys despise feminism becouse it's a hypocritical sexist movement that fosters anti-male ideology and female supremacy. On a more individual level men feel that it's unfair that women's gender roles have been deconstructed to the poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 03:01 PM
0

To awnser all of your questions: no. I also don't delude myself into thinking newage feminism is about equal rights. If it was then it would have lost relevancy decades ago as a movement as most people fit into that definition of a feminist. The reason why a lot of guys despise feminism becouse it's a hypocritical sexist movement that fosters anti-male ideology and female supremacy. On a more individual level men feel that it's unfair that women's gender roles have been deconstructed to the poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 02:59 PM
3

men shouldn't stick it in if they don't want a child At this point my reply to this garbage argument is that you shouldn't climb a ladder if you don't want to break your leg. I mean if you break your leg climbing ladders what did you expect? Now you want medical care to fix it? /s
/r/MensRights01/02/25 03:29 PM
2

Problem is that those are not equal rights. It's no equal if the party that has to carry the pregnancy to term has just as much say in it as the party who doesn't. Nobody should be forced into pregnancy and parenthood. It's also an incredibly fucked up idea to require someone's consent for a medical procedure and the lack of that consent can bar you out from accessing that procedure. It's a complete violation of autonomy. It should be the mother's choice alone if she wants to abort or not. As a …
/r/MensRights01/02/25 01:42 PM
9

Prisions don't "work" for anyone. Especially in the US. That's becouse the system treats prision as a kind of punishment while the main purpose should be rehabilitation and containment of the unrehibilatable. This is why you have tons of people who keep going back to prison time and time again. They spent so much of their life behind bars that they can no longer function in society, so they commit crime again to go back. The whole system is crooked and needs to be reformed from the ground up.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 01:57 PM
14

If a man refuses to pay child support then the woman has the power to obligate him by law.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 09:24 PM
17

Or poke holes in them if their partner is reluctant to have kids. Or when they "forget" to take contraception pills for 2 months.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 06:35 PM
5

Anti-male propaganda consitently platformed by mainstream media. Underrepresentation of male victims of female-perpetrated violence including but not limited to rape, domestic violence, revenge porn More lenient sentences for women than men commiting the same crimes. the systematic destruction of all male-only spaces white female-only places are in abundance. the draft only applying to men The consitent weaponisation of skewed data to justify hatred towards men Just to mention a few.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/01/25 01:01 PM
3

We also don't meet the same people so who knows really
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:20 AM
1

People-pleasing behavior detrimental to a person themselves Huh, interesting I almost exlusively seen men do that in the younger generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 11:30 PM
1

Oh... when men say that that's a little nicer version of " becouse you are an obnoxius asshole who feels the need to correct everyone in a patronising way". Men love smart women. Men love a woman who knows what she wants and can communicate that confidently. These are good qualities. Some people just confuse these qualities with being a standoff-ish douche who talks down to others.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:54 PM
2

Posts by a lot of people who are young and don't really have a firm grasp on how human relationships work. On the side of guys there is a lot of projecting as in blaming outside entities for their individual failure. Failure that mainly comes from social ineptitude. On the side of women it's somewhat the same with the addition of acting like mean girls. A lot of misandry and misogyny, people find it easer to mark the opposite sex as the adversary rather than checking their own shoes on an indivi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:27 PM
2

Dating app, very similar to Tinder. Same image-swiping system. The main reason I've used it is that it showed all nearby profiles not just the ones that pop up for you to swipe. It also didn't need a premium for your profile to be visible for other users.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 02:57 PM
4

I'm 6'1. Before courting my current GF I was broke and skinnyfat, no well defined muscle whatsoever on top of that I'm a smoker. Charisma is everything as well as selecting the right person to pursue. Before me the last guy who was interested in my gf took her on a date to a fucking grocery store. No, not to grab some snacks for hanging out. The store was the date itaelf. Another one who never got to meet up with her kept saying creepy weird shit and showing her off his knife collection. This is…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 01:36 PM
1

I've seen lots of men struggling to get a romantic relationship but most of the reddit dismisses it by saying it's a personal issue despite it being a common thing in young men. Being common doesn't make it any less of a personal issue. Obessity is also common depite being the consequence of individual choice. If you want people to be around you then you should be fun to be around. If you are socially inept that's a deep personal issue you should figure out becouse being socially competent is a …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:55 AM
5

You forget about some details of the job describtion. First off, you are not accountable for a company or a family that needs to be fed. 9 hours would sound about right but count in the prep and travel time and that's 12-3 hours each workday. Then the so-easily forgotten comforts of getting to be at your home and spending time with your kid. Actually being present for most of the formative years while your partner's nose is at the grindstone. Again, if you're not ok with the dynamic don't sign u…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 01:13 AM
7

Cool cool, quick question: when do you think housewives should get to clock off? Whenever they wish as they are not in a demanding workplace lmao. As Iong as the bare minimum living conditions are met, which isn't a lot. When do imagine clocking out when you live alone? When shit gets done. As responsible adults don't tolerate living in filth. Women are regularly baby trapped by men, so that's easier said than done. Lol. Lmao, even. I'm pretty sure you're trolling. Women baby trapped by men. Com…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:51 AM
1

You make a good point becouse it's worth discussing how sexual assault is viewed. Let's say someone derives sexual thrill from women's feet, (or men's feet, it doesn't really matter) and they started violating them by randomly rubbing their feet. The intent is sexual even if the bodypart isn't conventionally sexualised. So the definition of sexual assault is kinda dependant on where you draw the line on what makes the crime. Is it the sexual nature of the assault itself ( as in the intent to gai…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 10:58 PM
11

Simple: whoever works less hours takes the bigger share of chores. If both partners work on the same schedule then it's a clear 50/50 split. If one party decides to be a homemaker / stay at home parent then they should handle most of the chores if not all of them. If my partner was out there busting her ass off daily to foot both of our bills then she would be rightfully upset if she came home to an uncleaned house with no groceries and me demanding her to do 2-3 hours worth of chores after her …
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:06 PM
3

We all recognize that it is sexual behavior to wear very short skirts, very nearly or often explicitly flashing their underwear to both children and adults alike. Yep, agreed. The same applies to revealing blouses that accentuate the cleavage and expose much of the breasts. In fact, it is especially women's clothing that is so revealing and sexually provocative. Disagreed. Breasts are sexualised but they shouldn't be. I think it's a standard that should be gone and there is nothing wrong with go…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 04:37 PM
15

Assuming that women's value is determined by their age.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/25 09:37 PM
1

For the sake of clarity, my stance on the issue is that I think that either party to a pregnancy should have the right to terminate their responsibility to the unborn person at any time and for any reason up to the moment of birth. Same here, I highlighted the woman becouse ultimately she has to deal with the physical consequences with the unwanted pregnancy and she has the option to abort it. By all means I think the father should have a right to sign away parental rights and responsibilities a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 09:35 PM
17

Wow internalised misoginy and misandry in the same post from a woman. What a unicorn.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/25 08:34 PM
2

Especially when they are raped amirite? /s Outside of the obvious exceptions, birth control can fail. The father can die or dip during the pregnancy. There are a lot of variables. The only person who can take all of them into consideration and make an appropriate choice is the mother who has to deal with the consequences. Oh you don't feel responsible for the lives of strangers? How strange, you were very keen to enforce your "values" on them just a moment ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 06:41 PM
1

Well someone has to and Pro-Life compells people to pay for unwanted childred on a foundamental level wheter they want it or not. Either the parents directly or the taxpayer indirectly when the child is given up for adoption. So, sorry but not advocating for economical changes that would cause less demand for abortions is in fact a hypocratical pro-life stance. You're saying that unborn "life" has value but others should pay that value to accomodate for your "morals". Do you have any idea how in…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 06:16 PM
-1

Becouse they are psychos who resent women. On a deeper level it might originate from how people tell men who got someone pregnant by accident that " If you don't want to be a father you shouldn't have had sex, step up". As if it's normal to tell anyone that consent to sex is consent to a life altering decision. They might feel it's unjust that in the case of an unwanted pregnancy there is nothing the father can do legally to stop it but if it happens to women they essentially get a choice if the…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 02:24 PM
0

I didn't assume shit. I told you my personal experience and what I see the general opinion to be from friends and collegues. The bossy woman and sociopathic HR stereotypes exist for a reason. Ask any white collar guys and they will tell you the same. Very few people ascend to leadership positions using positive female traits because the people who reward behavior consider masculine traits to be better signs of leadership. Ultimately the company only cares about the numbers. If you can ultise fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 03:47 AM
1

Speak for yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:41 AM
0

First of all, rising on the corporate ladder can get you only so high without being a ruthless asshole. Idk about you but most people at the companies I worked with were socially hated, as they were bad people. If we're already talking about corporate culture we can also bring up how HR is almost exclusively female. No loudness, no asseriveness, high paying and ruthless aswell. Then the bit about female exclusive jobs. The lower tier jobs might not pay the best I'll give you that but that doesn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:37 AM
1

It's a free market, everyone is compeeting for resources. Even women do, shocker I know /s That resource may be a well paying job or groceries not a fucking individual. If I ever had to compete for a woman's attention I'd lose my interest instantly as I have no respect for someone who objectifies herself as some kind of prize. That's fucked up. Wars are started by men with other men to acquire these resources, which are then used as resources and status markers to attract women. Yeeees I'm sure …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 03:38 AM
1

Define "individualism". We are all individuals and self-serving, such is human nature. If you mean ability to co-operate then men are hardcoded to work best as part of a unit. Proof? Almost all team sports are male dominated, even ones where physical strenght plays a lesser role than strategy. It also makes sense in an evolutionary perspective. Men were the hunters, their life and by extension the community's life depended on teamwork.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 10:29 PM
1

I think you have it backwards my guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 05:59 PM
1

How so? Literally rewarded more than femininity by who? You mean when feminists call it "toxic"? You mean when some jobs are locked from you becouse they are serching for women only? People here who say that fulfilling masculine roles doesn't entiltle you to anything? Maybe the men in Ukraine who are forced to fight and die for their country while women got evacuated? What a great reward! You get to be sent to your death. Yay! Being feminine means people assign inherent value to you, being mascu…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 05:58 PM
1

Depends on context. Woman wants to marry young? She's a litteral child and the would be husband is a disgusting groomer pedo. Woman wants to turn to sex work the moment she turns 18? She's an adult and perfectly capable to make her own decisions. The whole discourse is very toxic becouse people just flip the script whichever way support their narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 05:26 PM
1

Aight, Ye (Kanye West) kinda killed this race with "Gold digger" and "I love it" tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 05:15 PM
1

Well yeah, if that's so important to you that you make it a top 5 non-negotiable, then yeah, you probably want a mom you can bang. "Traditional housewife" is just code for "I want a subservient maid I can bang, that I have significant social and financial control over" Some people just prefer the dynamic on both sides. Some people desipse working and don't want to exist in a working eviroment 40 hours a week but don't mind cooking and housekeeping. Other people don't mind working long hours and …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 05:10 PM
1

Yeah the problem with these cases is that laws shouldn't be more or less applicable based on the perp / victim's immutable characteristics. Even if we go with the idea that men take sexual violation better than women do, it shouldn't matter in the eyes of the law or society at large. It's a systematic issue and people's opinions wont change until a handful of female rapists get locked away for decades after violating men. Besides, how a victim personally copes with the consequences of the violat…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 03:46 PM
1

Therefore, women don't usually insult each other and instead insult the external threat that is men. Lol. Lmao, even. Not one group of people in this earth will judge a woman by her looks, lifestyle and personality as much as her own peers. It's just that women don't insult each other to to the face, instead they go behind each other's backs to "spill the tea". Most slut-shaming is done by women aimed at other women. Women bring each other down more than men do. Despite appearances there is litt…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 02:54 PM
0

I wonder how many canisters of copium it takes to write out nonsense like this. Feminity is straight up worshipped in modern society.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 02:37 PM
2

I think one's interests and hobbies are independent from "maturity". Maturity is when you stand on your own feet, do what you are supposed to( despite not neccessarily enjoying it) to create stability, when you have an emotional costitution to deal with the world's and other people's bullshit, when you have well defined goals you are working towards. Whenever you play a video game, tinker with your car or lift weights as a recreational activity doesn't matter. You could binge Mickey's playhouse …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 02:21 PM
1

Gold digger is appropriate to use whenever resources are the sole reason and main condition of a given relationship. Without the provider's awareness of the fact. Whenever both are aware and accepting with the financial incentive it's a sugar daddy-sugar baby kind of deal. If the woman actually wants partnership with the man but wants to be a SAH mom then most of society will not only be ok with that but even endorse it. Honestly the only people who would complain about that or look down on her …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:56 PM
0

What you mean is boy, that is the equivalent of girl. Not fucking "manbaby". Adult men call each other boys aswell, nobody sees it as infantilising. Adult women call adult men boys and nobody is offended. Maybe check your head of being called a girl as an adult fills you with seething rage to this extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:40 PM
2

Personality and charisma does 80% of heavy lifting for male attractiveness. 20% is not looking like a blob or a homeless person but some girls are verly lenient with that 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:27 PM
1

Why assign gender to this phenomenon? As if the same thing wouldn't be true for everyone. If you deviate too far from social conventions ( behavior, intetest, lifestyle, appearance, social interraction) people will be weirded out. These are workable issues so it's not even true that they will "never" be able to attract the opposite sex. They could be able, just unwilling.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 01:04 PM
3

I know but it's not like this sub will net tangible change. We can talk, share opinions and experiences but real change starts in real life activism. There are no organisation for protests here. The best this sub can do is change the opinion of a few individuals who find it. Reddit will be a misandrist shithole until management says otherwise.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 10:25 AM
8

You can't but at least you can go out smiling that they are proving you right.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:52 AM
6

Oh we are living in a rape culture, it's just extremely selective with it's definition of rape. Examples: adult male forces himself on adult female = rape adult female forces herself on adult male = not rape, not even a crime, pepetrator is entilted to child support from the victim + victim is considered lucky to be victimised adult male forces himself to adult male = rape adult female forces herself or adult female = assult / DV at worst adult male has intercourse with under 18 female = rape, g…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:04 PM
7

Yeah men don't report becouse in most cases they can't. This goes for domestic abuse awell sadly. If I had a coin for every guy I know who had been charged at with a knife by a crazy girlfriend with no legal consequences, I would have like 3 coins. Which doesn't sound like a lot but it's fucking crazy it happened 3 times, with the roles reversed those guys would rot in prison right now. But hey at least we have skewed statistics to let us know how bad we are /s
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/25 03:36 AM
10

I wonder if they'll ever do a biasless study ( I know it failed right there lmao) where they take into account males who are victims of non-violent forms of rape that are recognised with female victims. Like rape by deception ( such as sabotaged birth controll, undisclosed STD transmission, etc) , cases where the man was under the influence while the woman was sober. Stuff like that. They are sterotypes for a reason. They happen a LOT.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/25 01:37 AM
1

Meth is illegal, it doesn't mean shit lol . How would willingly abstaining from sex work services make someone qualified for "involuntary celibacy"? They would be able to if they were going for girls in their own league. There are a fuckton of mid women who are overlooked even by incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 07:54 PM
1

Shit logic and let me explain why. By your logic men can visit prostitutes and hire escorts. Incels can fuck whenever they want. Therefore there shouldn't be incels. Actually, that's a good point. Technically all incels are celibate by their own volition. The reason they are incels is not that they CAN'T get it. They can, everyone can. Even 300 lb mobility scooter hillbillies can. The reason they are incels is becouse they can't get sexual validation from the women that they want. Who is several…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 03:26 PM
1

Especially if the open up to the wrong crowd and get burned. Good luck coming back from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 06:51 PM
1

See man, you can tell me this. I believe thst this is how you see things. What needs a bit more understanding on your part is that most people don't see it that way. If you don't endorse objectification, you shouldn't engage in it one way or the other or people will see you as a hypocrite. End of story, no amount of mud in the water will change that. Actually, it will make your case worse becouse now you promote that this behavior is acceptable in certain situations. Just like how professional b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 06:26 PM
1

See, this is what I meant when I said that your opinion of what men want is out of touch.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 06:14 PM
1

Nah, it's convinient becouse it's a foundamentally harmful social convention regardless if it's beneficial to the subject or not. Engaging in it still reinforces objectification as an acceptable way of treating someone. Participating in a social convention you claim to be opposed to is hipocrisy and and endorsment of that convention. Do you also think being against rape requires being against all sex? A better example would be the people who are pretty outspoken against rape and sexual biolence …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 06:02 PM
1

It's an online space. Reddit at that. If you judge the average man by this sub then flip the script and think about if the women here, the most deranged ones are indicative of the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 05:53 PM
1

Isn't that convinient. Regardless of what you think, people will percieve this behavior as hypocritical. You can hamsterwheel it all you want but it is what it is. Ask Mia Khalifa lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 05:39 PM
1

Depends on who and about what. Different people are empathetic to different things. It also depends on the level of empathy, some issues need a complex understanding and relatability to be empathised with. Women might be better generalists empathising with carnal feelings a bit better as well as the experiences that are women specific. Tho they absolutely have a blindspot for men specific struggles, men can relate to each other a lot more on a deeper level than I think women can to each other. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 05:29 PM
1

Yeah the problem with that is that it's not a two-way street. If a woman claims to be against objectification but she objectifies herself when it's beneficial to her then people will see her as a hypocrite. You don't get to enjoy the benefits of something you are ideologically opposed to and expect people to take you seriously. It's the same as men who want their partners to be a bangmaid but still expect them to go 50/50 on finances. Clown behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 04:25 PM
2

He doesn't , he made him up. It's bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 04:07 PM
1

Completely out of touch. Men don't want someone who only sticks with them on the condition of their wages. Why do you think gold diggers are hated on? Maybe deformed rich assholes want trophy wives like that but claiming average dudes are after that s delusional. Men want partners, someone who actually betters their life and provides support. Just like women do. That comes with a shared financial burden as well as emotional support going both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 02:51 PM
1

I don't even think being community dick is as hard as people claim it to be. Let's look at women's case first. For women it's "easier" becouse of 2 reasons. They are the reactive party, that means propositions will be made to them and they can choose if they accept them or not. Their options are laid bare for the most part. Point 1. filters out the uncertainty if the other party is interested. That's about it. Most propositions will be undesired and by people they would have no interest in in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 02:14 PM
1

Deformed people and burn victims are definetly a minority, sure but the fact there are public figures among them, all married or in relationships disproves your point. By your logic these people should be excluded from the dating pool automatically.. Autistic people tho, I'd say there is a fair nomber of them, both successful and unsuccessful. There are people so low on the spectrum they live a lifetime without ever connecting the dots. So nah, I don't accept that one either. Truth is, your attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 01:21 PM
-1

"Genetically inferior" fucking kek. That's a massive amount of copium. I guess it's soothing to blame your shortcomings to something you have no control over. There are actualy deformed people, burn victims, amputees and high-functioning autists with wives and kids. Their existence contradicts your opinion completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 12:50 PM
0

I think this is a pretty self-defeatist attitude to have. Mainly reacting to the part regarding men, becouse that's what I hsve experience with, duh. For men, the main things that determine your attractiveness for most women are within your control. This is the tough pill to swallow, not embracing nihilism. Sure it's a lot easier if you are built like Henry Cavil but the average man can do a lot with a few things that you should do regardless of dating. Hygene, fitting clothes, charisma, fitting…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 12:39 PM
1

Ngl this can only be true if the conservative woman is 100% dependant on her partner financially. Even then it's not loyalty becouse of the goodness of their heart, just self preservation. That said conservatives have a tendency to stay for the family unit after infidelity, I heard more about men cheating in these scenarios more than women. Cheaters come from every cultural and ideological background, it's an individual quality. The idea of a cheating spouse is as old as civilisation itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 11:45 AM
1

Yes , ideology is definetly binary. You either get agreed with or the other person is an ideological adversary. What a fucking moron. You just called someone a homophobe who coverered for a gay person for over a year so they wouldn't get evicted by a boomer landlord. Hiding the fact that their partner was visiting constantly, even if it meant extra expenses for utility. Gave them groceries for free when they were broke. Yeah biggest homophobe around my dude. I'm definetly the ideolically radical…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 09:13 PM
1

You keep parroting that "porn created" this double standard. Who do you think created porn, my dude? Even if we base off the situation from your faulty theory, that still leaves us at the same place. Yeah, sure, everyone must be attracted to cis women. Even all cis women. How convenient lol. The Hub drops it's statistics yearly. According to the data women watch more lesbian porn than men do. But who cares about facts when you can engage in the dialectical equivalent of trashing around like an a…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 09:02 PM
6

Bro signed up to be a man and got the whole package. It's sad but at least he may see his "friends" as who they really are.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 07:19 PM
1

Okay man, I hear you. Let me rephrase what I said in a way that carries the point across a bit more directly. SUCK A COCK RIGHT NOW. IF YOU DON'T WANT TO THAT MEANS YOU ARE A HOMOPHOBE. Not dating bisexual people doesn't make someone a homophobe. Hating gay people does. Refusing to fuck some isn't a hate crime. How many men would deny bi women? Obviously, not so many. That's becouse lot of men fetishise lesbians. In fact even women do. It's one of the most popular porn categories. They don't fee…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 06:12 PM
2

It isn't tho. Denying anyone for any reason whatsoever is valid. People can have any boundries when choosing an intimate partner. Among other things I feel it's valid to worry if they ever feel the need to explore their sexuality. Like, what are women supposed to do then? Grow a dick? Let them sleep with strangers? Deny their desires? Not that it happens that frequently but a lot of people don't want to risk getting into this situation. It's an unnecesary and easily preventable risk. If you thin…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 02:48 PM
2

I mean sure but that brings up a few more questions. Does this also mean that a woman who enjoys dickhopping, as in jumping realationship to relationship for no other reason than self-gratification, should be accepting of the fact that a lot of her future partners will find her to be untrustworthy? Why and how should a partner trust that whenever an issue comes up in the relationship (including her getting bored overnight) she won't just dip the fuck out? What exactly is she doing to keep the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 07:17 PM
–

I think this is a remnant of an ingrained cultural standard. Think about it if the village burns down in an event where a lot of the tribe dies you need a lot less men than women to repopulate. One man can impregnate a lot of women but women can bear only one child at a time. Sure you still need genetic diversity but that still requires less men. At least that's my theory. In practice it shouldn't matter, we are no longer in survivor mode. Haven't been for hundreds of years. Repressing our insti…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:28 PM
6

Gotta love it how they bitch and moan about historical oppression as if they were the ones who had to deal with that. As if they weren't accomodated their whole life becouse of society's knee-jerk reaction to overcorrect that oppression. By all means, conspire, call for sex-based violence, do it. Give the justice system something that forces it's hand to treat misandry as any other hate-crime, it's been a long time coming.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/25 03:14 PM
1

On one hand there’s the consequences for the child. Could you imagine if your dad opted out of being your dad? If you struggled financially your entire life living with a single mom who could barely pay rent, and you knew it was because your dad wanted to abort you and was unhappy you were born? I do. My mom let my dad walk all over her until I was already an adult. No childsupport or alimony whatsoever. Yet he had the option to visit (my mom let him) , take me to my grandparents ( who resented …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 09:42 AM
–

Until there is evidence there is only accusation. It's the responsibility of the accuser to provide evidence for the crime. Nobody wants lives ruined based on nothing but hearsay. "Believe victims" sounds very nice but when it comes to the justice system you should always look at how people can exploit certain practices. I'd rather have 10 criminals walk free than 1 innocent person punished.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 06:23 AM
1

The female population in the US. is bigger than the male. They also live longer. Women have more voting power than men. If what you say was true Kamala would have been voted in as the 2nd female President of the USA after Hilary Clinton.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:22 PM
3

In League there was this all-women E-sport team called Vaevictis. They might offer an interesting read on the subject. The short of it was that they were clowned on so bad in their games that one of their opponent teams was penalised for bullying. Then eventually they got disqualified becouse every team gaped them in performance. To awnser your question: men and women are not just differentl phisically, our psychology is also quite different. There are things one sex will be inherently better at…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 11:23 PM
2

It's called comradery. Something completely missing from girl friendships. They have their cheap knockoff called "da sistahood" but it's shallow as puddle. The difference betwen the two is is that while women confide in each other to talk shit about other people they allegedly like (friends, boyfriends, family members etc), guys open up to each other about personal struggles becouse they know that the other person knows what it's like when everyone expects you to "man up and keep it in". That's …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 08:49 PM
6

It took until 1991 in the UK for marital rape to become illegal. That's only 35 years ago. A female still can't rape a male by legal definition in the UK as of 2025.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 03:47 PM
1

They are not fucking losers becouse they fail at dating. They fail at dating becouse they are fucking losers. Massive difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:42 PM
12

I will never understand why some men would behave this way Pussy. People rarely give a shit about things that don't directly affect them. They failed as conventionally attractive men becouse they are pathetic losers so they resort to echoing deranged nonsense to try to get some feminist coochie. Don't trust a self-identified male feminist, they are only there for the women's approval. If they could get it on a Trump rally they would put on the hat faster than lightning. They are not your allies.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 05:04 PM
10

Oh wow criminals are shitty people how shocking
/r/EverydayMisandry03/12/24 10:24 PM
9

Nice bait btw
/r/MensRights03/12/24 08:01 PM
3

I think most businesses fail due to the lack of marketing knowladge / research before starting up. For an example I was born and raised in Eastern-Europe. My hometown is notorious from frequently closing businesses and the lack of positions for employment that isn't factory work, fast food, storeclerk or a shady business that overworks and underpays their employees. On top of that salaries are pretty bad aswell, think of 600-800 bucks on average/month but store prices are largely the same as in …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 12:09 PM
3

This idea of finding relationships on Tinder is so idiotic. Sure, does happen sometimes when the stars allign but essencially Tinder is a business that aims to exploit desperate men, for that goal men getting into long term relationships is detrimental. Besides most people use it for hookups and self-validation. Men looking for LTR on Tinder are searching for gold in a coalmine.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 01:35 PM
40

Rent free
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/24 04:03 PM
1

This is the rare case when I say that would be justified given the state of Berlin. Let me elaborate, Germany is one of the leading voices that advocated for sheltering the refugees who migrated to Europe. They recieve a massive benefit from the government. This has caused a surplus of migrants to be in bigger German cities, like UK levels of sudden migration within a few short years. Even if western men accept women as equals and would advocate for equal treatment (which the overwhelming majori…
/r/MensRights16/11/24 09:10 PM
15

Yep, same thing with the wage gap bullshit. They weaponse data to support their narrative by completely misrepresenting it. That's just what they do. Female on male violance is grossly under-reported but nobody wants to talk about that. Whenever you are presented with social study ask yourself the question : "who would directly benefit from this?".
/r/MensRights16/11/24 08:38 PM
5

Old news but the more people are aware of it the better. Mind you, this is the country you can get jailed for online wrongthink.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 08:31 PM
1

Your serching for a fine lining where there isn't one. Genital mutilations are bad and should be banned, end of story. It's like arguing if Ted Bundy or John Wayne Gacy should be put to the electric chair first.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 10:21 PM
1

Wrong. The female circumcision only removes the "hood" on top of the clitoris. What you are thinking about is a more barbaric form of FGM that rarely if ever saw western countries. Circumcised women are perfectly capable of experiencing orgasms. Tho you are right that in places like Africa they do also remove the clitoral glan , inner and outer labia. Those barbaric practices are more harmful to the victim's quality of life. Let's just keep all forms of infant genital mutilations under the same …
/r/MensRights13/11/24 05:21 PM
14

Really puts it into perspective how much useless bloat is on society. Btw wtf is the married chick doing there? Can't even read the base tenets of the cult she's following lmao
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 11:11 PM
10

I see no femists in leading positions speaking up against the extremism associated with the movement. You see no media coverage on huge networks how prevalent and corrosive misandry has become, how radical feminists blatantly call for violence against men. The only radfems who are openly criticised are TERFs. It's not that "real feminists" don't see this shit happen, They choose to be willingly ignorant and tolerant to it then proceed to hide behind the texbook definition of the movement. The re…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:30 PM
3

You might be playing on a different server my guy
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:06 AM
6

Depends on where you live. I'm sure this opinion holds up in 3rd world shitholes but it's untrue for 1st world countries. Are there men who hate women and view them as inferior to them? Sure but it's a vocal minority. Our culture celebrates and even overglorifies femininity. Women enjoy a number of social privilages. Violence of any kind against women is viewed as the lowliest thing a man can do. So no, get a grip and face the reality. If men in general wouldn't have a high opinion of women soci…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:12 AM
3

Closet lesbian social club
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 01:55 AM
7

Worked great in South Korea aswell, it set men's general opinion of women back 50 years. Turns out if women treat their sexuality as a barteling tool then men won't have a high opinion of them. Shocker.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:57 PM
5

Imagine forcing a loved one onto the operating table for an unnecessary procedure. I mean all power to guys who willingly go trough with it but this should be their choice only. Funny how the women who preassure their partners into this claim to be the biggest champions of body autonomy.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 02:31 AM
15

Men bad That's their reason. You see if men good or god forbid some men bad then they can't weaponise an immutable characteristic to support their narrative.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 03:27 AM
1

Female on male violence is grossly underreported becouse of the stigma. Unless the violence was commited when the victimised man was prepubuesent, it's almost never taken seriously. On top of underreported cases of violence a lot of countries refuse to recognise female on male rape cases where the victim was touched inappropriately, made to penetrate or made to ejaculate inside of a woman without consent. Not to mention the less apparent cases of unconsentual cases where men can be victimised su…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 08:41 AM
1

To be fair male feminists are also ridiculed as simps. It's something along the lines of " why would you vocally support a cause that doesn't benefit you on a foundamental level and oftentimes works for the detriment of a group you belong into" The logical conclusion to that is that the benefit they gain doesn't lie with the values of said cause but with the approval of the followers of the cause. Very common behavior among groups that center around a shared ideology. I'm pretty sure most authen…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 04:53 PM
18

Last I checked rapists and pedos get thrown into jail, get fucked up by other inmates and if they ever walk free they will be on a public list. Besides it's ok to be disgusted by basic body functions. Last I checked everyone takes shits, that doesn't mean other people have to see or smell it.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/10/24 06:52 PM
4

True gender equality was always just a front to feminism. Huge respect to 1st and 2nd wave feminists for fighting for women's rights in a time when it needed to be fought for and this kind of activism could genuinely end bad for them individually. Right now, the only power men hold over women in the west is physical. Women will be favored both socially and legally. If feminism was ever about gender equality we would have never reached the point we are at now. If feminism was about gender equalit…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/24 07:19 AM
9

Exactly. Fair or not, every group is responsible for their extremists. As long as feminists refuse to publicly call these nutcases out in opposition to their views, people will view these idiots as a representation of feminist ideas. This is a very common issue in every activist / political group. It wouldn't hurt if they themselves figured out and defined exactly what their ideology is all about so they would have grounds to disasociate from these weirdos. Before someone comes at me, men as a w…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/24 07:01 AM
3

This is your primary concern about hatred against men? I doubt it, but if you want to reason with someone with opposing views, you must appeal to what they care about. If you say misandry is bad becouse it makes men suffer, unethical by it's foundation they won't care, that does not concern them. If you say misandrist views create more people sympathetic to your opposition then that is something they are concerned about. Something they are less likely to ignore if they delude themselves with the…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/09/24 09:12 AM
1

If a man earns a position in his career a lot less people will assume that he didn't work for it than if he was a woman. If birth controll fails, the man has no say if he will become a father or not. If he decides to step away he gets socially shunned and legally obligated to found the upbrining of an unwanted child. Just reproductive rights in general.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 01:02 AM
9

Would you trust the safety of youf infant child to a random woman or a Golden Retriever? Everyone can weaponise data. It's silly.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/09/24 09:23 PM
24

Sure love the concept of the original sin. That one never ended in genocides ever. It's a very healthy and sane way of thinking.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/08/24 06:06 PM
2

Some people get off on trying to drag others down to their level. Misery loves company.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:27 PM
7

But Batman literally does that as Bruce Wayne wtf. Doesn't he have his own orphanage or something?
/r/MensRights14/07/24 12:43 PM
2

The amount of cock scenes in this show feels like fetishization at this point. I 100% get the vibe that Kripke projects his sexual desires and political ideas on the show.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 12:41 PM
11

Hm just out of curiosity, if someone were to make the same comic with the geners flipped what would you bring up as an example for double standards?
/r/EverydayMisandry27/06/24 06:34 PM
26

A lot of criminals draw the line at hurting women and children so it makes sense. Even if we take criminal morality out of the question men get careless more often, get confrontational more often with invasive strangers, generally have less people looking out for them, more likely to carry cash. These are all things that make men a better target for voilent crimes sadly. We are just less aware of it becouse women's safety awareness gets talked about more.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 11:06 AM
2

Yeah good luck enforcing it. Argueably the worst possible thing they could do to deal with this issue is put it on spotlight. This will greatly increase the number of images created and the number of victims.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 09:41 PM
9

If a woman speaks up for men's issues she will be flagged as a pickme.
/r/MensRights05/03/24 12:06 PM
-1

Society is made of individuals. You form society as much as the next person. Others' shitty behavior doesn't justify yours.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 09:50 AM
-3

And as mentioned above if you are unable to help physically (that covers the affraid of getting hurt part) being a witness goes a long way. Walking past and closing it out is enabling but hey what do I know. The worst thing people are packing in europe is a pocket knife.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 10:30 PM
-13

If you see a crime going down, have the ability to stop it / help prosecution and decide not to then you are enabling this behavior. You shouldn't stop a purse-snatcher to "protect a woman" but becouse he's a piece of shit criminal commiting theft before your eyes. If you are able you should attempt to help, if you're not at least take a good look at the prep and give a witness report to the police. It's not about owing anyone anything. Stealing should have 0 tolerance in a civilised society. En…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:43 PM
10

It's pretty great as long as you are white, conservative and straight. Source : living in the country next door. Same shit here but economy is shittier.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 06:29 AM
3

Anything op might consider unattractive. As I said people are allowed to raise the bars wherever they like. I used a cartoonishly radical example to illustrate my point.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 06:12 PM
2

There never was unconditional love. Love was always conditional even in ancient times. Whoever tells you otherwise is selling you a lie. Even if you don't admit it your love has conditions aswell. Put yourself in her shoes, if you were planning to have a future with someone would you be more prone to date an entilted bum with 20 dollards to his name or someone who has his shit figured out? Same as you wouldnt date a crackhead whore with 5 kids from 5 different baby daddies and a useless degree. …
/r/MensRights25/12/23 01:11 PM
1

Mainly if someone doesn't like the idea of dating someone who is attracted to and potentially had sexual relations with a same-sex partner. Their reasoning really doesn't matter becouse if its something they don't want to deal with they shouldn't. Why would a bisexual man want to date a woman who finds his sexual orientation a dealbreaker?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:37 PM
3

If you unironically think that you might be in the wrong crowd. There are a lot of men's rights isdues worth adressing. What OP posted is not one of those tho.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:08 AM
4

Doesn't matter, people are free to decide who they want to date and sleep with lol. They can set any bountry they want.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 08:11 AM
3

Ehhh, let's not be hypocritical here guys. When the TRA's pushed the narrative that how it's discriminatory / bigoted / transphobic to exclude trans people from your dating pool everyone agreed how invasive and disrespectful it was to people's dating autonomy. Same thing here, everyone deserves the same rights regardless of gender identity and sexual orientation. However, people don't owe you affection or attraction and honestly why would you even want to be with someone repulsed by you? Stop ma…
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:35 PM
2

I just believe that if you actually strive for equal rights, or just generally care about human rights then a literal sex trafficer should hold no credibility to you. The Tate hill is a weird place to die on.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 09:19 AM
2

Apparently advocating for men's rights and not hating women at the same is a hot take by your standards. Ironically, emasculating their opposition is a typical radfem tactic when they know they can't defend their outlandish takes with reason.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 02:28 AM
13

I'm all for men's rights. That sex trafficer trash who does everything in his power to radicalise young people can eat a dick tho.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 12:28 AM
31

I heard that in university with the addition that boys should EARN to right to fertility.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 02:43 PM
1

Yeah I'm not sure I wanna go down the road feminists have chosen and make men's issues trans rights issues. I mean yeah they should be welcome but the narrative stays the same. Some of men's issues overlap with theirs but drafting for an example is something that directly affects men who were born males. They can dodge drafting whenever, so it's not something that loomes over their head. Mutilation of the male genetalia in infancy is another. Honestly trans men have their own share of social iss…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:40 PM
2

Then I guess mohawks are privilaged becouse they don't fear heights lol Delusional fears have nothing to do with privilage.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 04:32 PM
5

or murder. Nice one sneaking that in there considering women are less likely to be victims of violent crimes as men. Even more interesting that women suffer crimes like these in bars, their homes, friends homes instead of the streets at night. If someone will commit these crimes against women it will most likely be someone they know, are friends or family with. Men actually get randomly assaulted, mugged, stabbed, murdered by complete strangers a LOT more. On the fear part... I may fear of cross…
/r/MensRights02/09/23 04:15 PM
1

If 2 guys attack you the results are the same. Even masters of martial arts have trouble fighting more than one opponent at once. Combine that with a higher likelyhood of it happening. Criminals have no remorse for men but often draw the line at hurting women and children. Tho it is unlikely you will get raped or sex trafficed. So there is that.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 01:08 PM
1

Instead of awnsering the question I'd like to share an interesting observation. I'm on the way to get my bachelor in graphic design. 2 semesters down 4 to go. In the university there is a consistency of "young talented artists" 18-22 year old girls already opening their own exhibitions in galleries. There are some overlaping things betwen them. For one, they can't draw/paint for shit. Not in the "ugly is beutiful" way, there is a noticable lack of foundation in their skills. Another factor is al…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 02:04 PM
-15

This trobalistic thinking leads to nothing but pain for everyone.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 08:57 PM
1

Oh it's not a good thing ofc. It means that the biggest extremist in your group will be used as an example that defines the group. Is that fair? Nah, but law and public perception always bases on extremes. Only way to combat this is publically calling out extremist behavior and disasociate from it. That's all you can do about it besides treating extremosts with zero tolerance. Also I don't believe the same sentiment is possible to hold against an entire sex. More so for smaller, political groups…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 09:03 AM
3

What you can do is publicly speaking up about not standing for these exstremist opinions and those who do has no place in the said group. There. Not much but makes all the difference. Even better would be the no tolerance removal of these individuals from said group. If you manage a group dedicated for a specific social issue you should actively remove people from it who speak against your narrative on a foundamental level. For an example: feminism. If your angle is "women are disadvantaged in x…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 10:29 PM
18

After the shit already hit the fan men have no reproductive rights. Women are suprised men leave a child they didn't even want in the first place. If you're a woman and keep a child despite the father showing clear disinterest in raising it, you shouldn't be suprised if he leaves. At that point you alone wanted the kid so you alone should raise it. Men should have a way to legally dissasociate from children they don't want and the women trying to babytrap them.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:55 PM
9

Every group is responsible for their own extremists.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:17 PM
4

You can lose all your assets, you may regain them at some point. Get mutilated and lose a part of your body? No coming back from that. It will be that way until the day you die.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 10:41 PM
3

I'm all for men's rights but like any other community some people strayed to an overly radical "us vs them" mentality. Denying women's issues is just as shitty as denying men's issues. They are invalidated so they try to invalidate someone else by punching down. Wrong way to go.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 10:38 PM
3

People like the black and white thinking. It simplifies concepts for them so they can understand them without puting in effort to learn about different perspectives. Any woman who follows that book will end up al9ne and miserable, same as incels.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 02:15 PM
3

Women who treat sex as a transaction in relationships should be avoided like the plague.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 11:06 AM
2

Lmao no you wouldn't be on her side no matter what. That depends on how she acts with the family, realations. Theres a ton of shittalking and resentment in most familes. So it's up to context. If I did shit like this I'd be supported but my family would still take my head off for provoking the attack.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/22 05:54 PM
1

males Ew
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/21 10:58 PM
7

AmItheAsshole's population is 70% girls under the age of 23 At least according to a survey. Most probably never been in a relationship or even outside of their room. Also relationship_advice has almost the same followers as amitheasshole.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 08:03 PM
14

Like that would be taken seriously thr other way around lmao
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/05/20 03:49 PM
-17

100% bullshit
/r/PussyPass27/02/20 08:47 PM
0

Funny you say that. More often than not it's women starfishing trough sex becouse ' you're the man you do the work' contributing nothing but a cunt to the intercourse. Ofc these are usually the type of girls who are extremely open with their sexuality. So I'm gonna make the bold assumption that you OP are one of those star fishes who are no better than a sex doll , complain about how bad men are doing. Also I recommend you checking out r/badwomensanatomy if you think every woman is capable to cu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 09:45 PM
1

Ya'll smell like sweat both 'men' and 'women' of this thread. Get outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/19 01:18 PM
1

You would be suprised how many women has problem with boundries. Many men are just open to advances.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/19 09:10 AM
-1

Not really. . In fact I don't even have a political stand. I just hate it when entertainment is tainted by the ideas of people like Brie. Just really kills the soul of these stories. Edit: I mean this to any radical ideals. My main problem with SJW characzers like Captain Marvel or let's say Batwoman is that it's clear that they haven't been created with creative intentions. They only exist to push a political agendaand show the world how pc the cteators are. I don't think this is worthy of Marv…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/19 08:33 AM
3

Brie Larson is a trash human. In fact you could see in interviews when she was on cam with basically anyone in the mcu they showed how disgusted they were of her. I mean they didn't even wanted her toughing them. Turns out exploiting your fame to push your political agenda is looked down upon in some places. Who would've tought. Not to mention that Captain Marvel had no relevance aside from being an sjw/feminist magnet. Anyway , Brie is no worse than the average radical feminist. Her flaws are j…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/19 07:59 AM
61

The problem is that they stay in contact claiming they are in the "friendzone" that just puts both parties to a shitty position. It's awkward for one and hurtfull for the other. One thing is to be friends without any romantic interest and another sticking around waiting for a girl to change her mind. Learn to walk away people.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/10/19 09:34 PM
2

Either god tier entiltement or shitty sarcasm.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/19 10:49 AM
-9

No , everyone is allowed to have their opinions. Unlike you I don't get offended by opinions. I don't rly care about if they hate women in general or if they just realised the dating scene is not for them without any hate for them. I said that they appear more like a women hating pitty party than " men going their own way" becouse if they did they wouldn't bitch about something that doesn't concern them anymore. Also , it would be nice if you wouldn't jump into conclusions while missing my whole…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 07:52 PM
-30

Nothing. Absolutely nothing. I'm all for men (and women) who been trough a shitty long term or a series of dating attempts quiting the dating pool and try to be the best of themselves by focusing on their work , hobbies and their own happiness. Dating isn't for everyone. The problem with MGTOW is that they always seek self-justification by hating on women instead of living what they stand for in theory. MGTOW should be about self-improvement and being happy independently but what they do pretty …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/10/19 11:41 AM
4

Can back it up. I'm a guy who used to have a lot of friends who were woman. They are the fucking worst. They can't handle a conflict head on like men .They slowly poision each other with ruining each others reputation and position , many times relationships behind each others back while playing nice.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/19 05:42 PM
3

Im not an American , I live in Hungary which is by core a conservative country. So this MeToo thing is pretty much non-exsistent , so as rafical feminism and only the women who socialised on western media. They are a loud but growing minority but they don't even come close to what is decribed in the comments. Might be offensive as fuck but progressive cuntries sound like shitholes for straight men. They are borderline treated as 2nd class citizens. Just yesterday I read a comment where some woma…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/19 01:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter