TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lurker_IV Archive

View 67 posts and 1,456 comments by Lurker_IV on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9597

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights25/11/15 04:28 PM
1821

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:37 PM
894

GeneralLurker_IV/r/MensRights29/02/16 06:40 PM
364

GeneralLurker_IV/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:18 PM
358

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:11 AM
276

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights25/09/16 07:04 PM
262

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights18/10/15 09:08 PM
173

Social IssuesLurker_IV/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:36 PM
139

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights26/09/16 12:18 AM
110

False AccusationLurker_IV/r/MensRights24/12/15 02:19 AM
92

FeminismLurker_IV/r/MensRights16/12/15 02:09 AM
90

Legal RightsLurker_IV/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:29 AM
83

GeneralLurker_IV/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:51 PM
70

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:12 PM
68

FeminismLurker_IV/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:33 AM
62

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:34 PM
59

FeminismLurker_IV/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:36 PM
56

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:41 PM
56

GeneralLurker_IV/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:40 PM
54

Legal RightsLurker_IV/r/MensRights18/11/15 08:31 PM
50

Fathers/CustodyLurker_IV/r/MensRights04/12/15 05:57 PM
49

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights31/10/15 07:44 PM
49

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:56 AM
48

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:41 PM
43

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights23/08/16 11:54 PM
41

SatireLurker_IV/r/MensRights21/03/15 04:53 AM
36

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights20/10/13 02:53 AM
35

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:55 AM
30

Legal RightsLurker_IV/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:09 AM
27

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:14 AM
22

Anti-MRMLurker_IV/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:43 PM
22

GeneralLurker_IV/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:32 PM
21

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights06/02/17 12:54 AM
20

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:50 PM
18

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights16/05/15 04:59 AM
17

Social IssuesLurker_IV/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:32 AM
17

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:24 PM
16

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:37 AM
16

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights05/09/16 01:40 AM
15

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:04 PM
15

Social IssuesLurker_IV/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:10 AM
15

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights19/11/15 11:44 PM
15

Men's Rights NewsLurker_IV/r/MensRights07/06/14 01:11 AM
15

Social IssuesLurker_IV/r/MensRights03/10/15 07:08 PM
14

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:42 AM
13

Edu./Occu.Lurker_IV/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:37 AM
12

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights07/02/16 07:39 PM
12

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:55 PM
12

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:34 PM
12

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:12 PM
12

Social IssuesLurker_IV/r/MensRights24/10/15 04:14 PM
11

GeneralLurker_IV/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:11 PM
7

Social IssuesLurker_IV/r/MensRights26/11/15 09:25 PM
7

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights16/01/16 03:13 AM
5

Activism/SupportLurker_IV/r/MensRights23/08/16 02:49 AM
5

QuestionLurker_IV/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:04 PM
5

GeneralLurker_IV/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:56 AM
5

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:06 PM
4

GeneralLurker_IV/r/MensRights24/11/15 06:01 AM
4

QuestionsLurker_IV/r/MensRights25/10/15 08:44 PM
2

Blogs/VideoLurker_IV/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:10 PM
2

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights13/10/14 12:09 AM
2

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:45 AM
1

DiscussionLurker_IV/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:32 PM
1

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:53 PM
1

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights03/10/13 03:59 PM
0

Lurker_IV/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:06 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,456 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Plenty of resources in the sidebar. Maybe the website you are looking for is in there somewhere.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 03:12 AM
1

This isn't a roleplay club. For that try going to r/roleplay This also isn't a story writing club. For that go to r/StoryPrompts If you have some matter you want to deal with you don't need to make up fictional events to discuss it.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 11:36 AM
6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h5CSHGSn3I lol
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/23 11:33 AM
23

Good choice! People can get circumcised at any age so there is no need to do it to a baby. Adult circumcisions are usually because of religious reasons such as converting to Judaism or something. If your son decides to get circumcised on his own he has his entire life to make his own mistakes as an adult.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 08:49 PM
6

In the olden days MARRIED WOMEN were largely immune to the law and it was the husband's responsibility to manage them. I mean that literally. If a wife stole something or trespassed or incurred a debt of some kind the husband would be punished by the law for it. The only laws women were held accountable to were capital offences such as murder. These laws were called 'coverture' laws. This is why men could 'physically chastise' their wives because they were literally the only law that applied to …
/r/MensRights05/05/23 10:27 PM
-2

nah, I'll conclude yer full of it.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:53 PM
3

Give me a link to read it from.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 09:49 PM
23

So what you are saying is: paragraph 2: "he killed himself because of rape accusations" paragraph 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22: useless words paragraph 23: "those accusations were false" a linking to non-paywalled NYT article if I'm understanding wrong please.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 08:11 PM
52

How dare you have expectations from women! How dare you!
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/23 07:23 PM
39

That is a very convoluted title. Try making it very simpler. "Imagine a world where women could be tricked into carrying and giving birth to babies that weren't theirs. Would they make maternity tests illegal in that world?"
/r/MensRights01/05/23 08:20 AM
2

Thanks. Reddit created the NP links option more than 10 years ago specifically to prevent brigading. For some reason most people don't seem to know about it anymore.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:41 AM
3

You can post reddit links with NP which means "no points" which disallows voting or commenting. for example https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/12fxttf/tf_is_wrong_with_twitch/ so make a link allready mate.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 06:23 AM
32

Try some reverse psychology on them by agreeing with them ironically: "I too hope for a future where ONLY MEN ARE MURDERED." "I dream of a world where every murder is men and ONLY MEN. Where every workplace death is a man and only a man." "A glorious world where all violence is targeted at men and men only. A world where ONLY MEN are hated and ONLY MEN are despised. " "For every woman's life a man should die. And for every man's death a woman should be celebrated." Agree with them to show the en…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 09:02 AM
10

Its just standard fems being fems. I've come to think women being victims is an evolved innate part of women in order to make men give them their way. Just cry 'I'm a victim' louder and harder till men give you what you want.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 03:18 AM
16

https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/search?q=paternity+test&restrict_sr=on&include_over_18=on paternity tests are an attack on women paternity tests are men trying to enslave and control women paternity tests are misogyny paternity tests are another way for abusers to hurt women yadda yadda
/r/MensRights22/03/23 01:42 AM
2

So if I understand you correctly you are saying the actual words of the laws and actual texts of laws don't even matter. All it takes is for some judge to decide "that is not what we wanted to happen" or "that is not what we intended to use the law for" and then they can ignore any actual written law cast their own judgements however they want?
/r/MensRights20/03/23 02:12 AM
11

Back in 2001 (iirc) Spain created a separate gender court system just for women to prosecute men who done them wrong. It keeps getting worse from there.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 05:42 PM
3

Sweden really is that one sided. About 10 years ago they canceled their affirmative action programs because they helped a few men over women. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/duplicates/3h834l/sweden_where_60_of_university_students_are_women/
/r/MensRights09/03/23 08:14 PM
7

Go to the engineering and business school and it will be almost all men. Close but b.s. There are all of about 15 degrees that still have a simple majority male of graduates. 15 of more than 400 types of degrees. And just because those last dozen just happen to pay well they claim some vast conspiracy to oppress women. There are plenty of kinds of degrees in the other 385 that pay just as well.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 10:43 AM
4

the power dynamic a.k.a. made up excuses for when you can't find anything actually wrong. He's older = he has more 'power' He's rich = he has more 'power' he's famous = he has more 'power' He isn't a Jedi using mind control on people. Wtf even is this 'power'? How many 'power points' does each year difference give someone?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 08:48 PM
3

We call it 'equality-plus'. In order for one side of the equation to always be at least equal requires they can never be less than half. They can never be less than equal at any point. Equality-plus in other words is supremacy for one side with a nicer name.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 11:54 PM
7

Remember: they canceled their affirmative action program over a decade ago because it helped a few men over women.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:06 AM
2

I always put the Ls last.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 04:39 PM
3

Indeed. Also anytime at all that they say "Women AND ---" that automatically makes whatever they say next a majority of the population. Women and children Women and GBTLs Women and homeless women and minorities (LOL) ... all are global majorities when added together.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 03:12 AM
6

Have you ever read or heard about 'The Metamorphosis' by Franz Kafka? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Metamorphosis Same thing pretty much. Its a metaphor for a boy growing into a man. Written in 1913 and the boy becomes a giant cockroach instead of a cute, adorable fox.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 07:10 PM
6

That doesn't mean the writers didn't use it as comedy. The old 'who says rape jokes can't be funny?' defense. Mommy lives in denial of the possibility that her daughter can have any sexuality of her own so she automatically accuses and attacks any man her daughter shows any interest in of being a rapist monster. Honestly its not unbelievable behavior for a lot of women I've known. Still not funny though.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 04:52 AM
6

The Theym you were talking to is a disgusting, manipulative POS. Its not illegal to ASK for a paternity test because they make it illegal to ACTUALLY GET ONE DONE without the mothers permission (edit: in the UK and some of the EU). As in if you went ahead and sent a saliva swab into a lab for testing without the her permission or knowledge she can have you arrested if she ever finds out about it. As in even if you find out the child is not yours from the test you would have to keep the test secr…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 04:04 PM
9

any crime against woman is gender based Spain?
/r/MensRights19/12/22 01:27 PM
-1

Meaningless mash of words. AI will bury us in word avalanches.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:58 AM
8

They ruled it was for the "interest of children". No seriously, a judge ruled that if children found out their fathers were not their actual fathers then it would "psychologically damage" them to "lose the only fathers they had ever known" Preserving the lie of paternity fraud is for the children. If men stopped paying child support for children that aren't theirs then that lack of money would also 'hurt the children'.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 06:11 PM
6

Simplest explanation for her: someone switched out your baby with another baby at the hospital. Your baby is 100% NOT YOURS. She will see the logic then. Women never have to question if a baby is theirs so fidelity doesn't matter to them. All children are "society's children" to them as long as they've popped out at least one themselves.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 05:48 PM
79

They ruled it was for the "interest of children". No seriously, a judge ruled that if children found out their fathers were not their actual fathers then it would "psychologically damage" them to "lose the only fathers they had ever known" Preserving the lie of paternity fraud is for the children.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 07:09 AM
1

You sad malignant tumor. I didn't say "never met" I sad 'never even seen'. I know dozens of single mothers with children who don't know their fathers. If you think I've never met a single mother with a child before then there is nothing innocent about you. Why would they be on emergency contact for the child if the child can't even identify the person contacted?
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:59 AM
0

Are you telling me that a HIGHSCHOOL AGE child had never met their father at all ever and even didn't even know what their father looked like?
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:04 PM
2

I don't know too much about Spain really. I do remember a few years ago that a female political candidate (I don't remember what the exact election was for) made a complaint and had her male opponent arrested for a night under the gender-violence law because she felt threatened by his official communications. Everyone thought it was ridiculous, even in Spain, but it still happened.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:37 AM
74

I love it when they say people like Elon Musk give off "incel vibes". As if billionaires can't get any.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 09:27 PM
14

In Spain they have an entire independent court system for crimes done to women by men. They created it back in 2001. All they have to do is point at a man, any man, and say "that man gender-violenced me!" and instant trial date is set.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 04:28 AM
5

REMEMBER PEOPLE: In many countries you legally can't 'rape' without a penis. Women get 'sexual assault' at best/worst.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/08/22 01:43 PM
2

Those men get a 25% decrease in their overall life expenses. That is they are now stuck in a tiny-1-room apartment or living in their car and they had to get a second job to pay the alimony for the ex. So a second job and living in car = income improvement! Alimony and child-support usually don't count as "income" for the women.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:03 PM
3

The article is tricky and deceiving. It tries to hide and dismiss alimony and "maintenance" as the Brits call it. Do you see how in one sentence they're talking about childless marriages and in the next sentence they switch to marriages with children. How much alimony do the childless men pay? How many divorces happen after the children have left the home, so no child payments? (tricky omissions) Most likely the men are forced to get a second job to pay for the alimony and/or child-support while…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 05:56 PM
5

The government gets a cut of every bit of 'child support' money that gets funneled through them. Therefore reducing child support would mean less money for them. So they try to never reduce child support payments.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 06:27 AM
4

Saw her at the California showing in San Diego. Twas lots of fun to be there.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:09 PM
3

Blast From The Past
/r/MensRights03/07/22 06:39 AM
-2

You're trying to play around Man you are clearly far too worked up today. How many coffees have you had this morning? If ya ladies don't want a baby then don't have sex. Thats not an attempt at combativeness.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:17 PM
6

The inability to decide when and with who to have a child should be a universal basic right I can see why men do not appreciate this How is this not an option now? Just don't have sex if you don't want baby.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:05 PM
2

Its been that way for decades in India. The article linked if from 2009. Accuse someone of rape/sexual assault and then their entire family get put in jail till they pay the ransom and the woman then drops the rape charges. Government assisted kidnapping-and-ransom.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 04:56 AM
1

Paul Elam is a great man who has been a lifelong Men's Rights Activist. He runs avoiceformen.com and so much more. u/ Asatmaya is a dweeb
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:58 PM
20

Technically the policy is in domestic violence cases to arrest whoever is physically bigger and physically stronger no matter who is the aggressor or who is attacking who. This means arresting the man 99% of the time. It was first tried out in Duluth, Minnesota thus the name
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/22 05:22 PM
1

Just look them in the eye and say, "You do look exactly like a very hateful person. When I think of hate I think of you."
/r/MensRights15/05/22 06:14 PM
1

The supreme court ruled back in 1918 (I think) that the draft was not unconstitutional. You CAN refuse to be drafted but they can then take away all of your federal 'privileges' like voting and a credit rating.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 09:44 PM
5

The left eat themselves while the right sacrifice some of their own to the left-rage mob from time to time while doing nothing on their own. You're right; the right has its own problems that keep them from getting anywhere.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:05 AM
3

Yes it does mean that. I'm showing that even with the most popular war in USA history they still had to draft 2/3rds of the soldiers. You probably won't ever find a major war that has an entire/majority volunteer army for any country.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 11:41 AM
4

WWII for the USA had an insanely high volunteer rate of almost any modern war. That rate: ~40%.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 10:40 PM
15

Living is a punishment now? The dead have it easier?
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:52 PM
2

Actually Putin eventually threw the leader of FEMEN out of a window a couple years ago and killed him. Even Putin gets tired of the harassment eventually. It took about 7 years of annoying Putin with naked women to get him to respond.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 06:32 PM
1

Send a picture of your own BOOBS back then. Man boobs.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 12:06 AM
1

I have 3 of her books. They're well written. Kiss my ass.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/21 05:20 PM
6

She wrote a book about it. Give it a read. She is an author, she writes books. https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/16532.Norah_Vincent
/r/PussyPassDenied25/11/21 07:54 AM
16

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coverture This general concept expands to most of the modern Western countries including the USA. Husbands took complete financial and legal responsibility for their wives and family. Marriage/Households used to mean something. Husbands had to pay for any legal sentences of convictions against their wives except for capital crimes. Wife gets caught stealing: the husband pays the fine. Wife causes physical injury on someone(such as a car accident): the husband gets w…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/11/21 04:13 AM
27

Then you put up signs all around the INSIDE of the house saying "YOU ARE BEING RECORDED ON CAMERA AT ALL TIMES! (Yes even now!)"
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:13 PM
1

Yes. This topic has been discussed on reddit many times before.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:21 PM
2

What ever happened to NP.reddit.com linking? Of was it NF.reddit.com ? You might add that detail in your comment BOT!
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:58 PM
6

Women ARE A MAJORITY NOW in the STEM fields. They exclude biology, pharmacy, veterinary, and nursing from counting in STEM in order to keep women a minority in the counts.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 05:46 PM
12

Quotas for women in male dominated field never discriminated against men It means: we WANTED to discriminate against men and we TRIED to discriminate with a quota system, but not enough women showed up to make it happen. So we tried and failed and then they say , "never discriminated [successfully] against men."
/r/MensRights02/07/21 05:43 PM
4

It would be really funny if someone changed the graffitti to: "EDUCATE YOUR DAUGHTER" "EDUCATE YOUR SON" as if we were living in some muslim caliphate country
/r/MensRights14/05/21 01:44 AM
3

Indeed accelerating dementia, as Biden clearly has, will tend to make that stuttering even worse. His sudden, major stuttering problem re-appearing just within the last 2 years clearly is a sign of a man not mentally fit to be in his job. Someday you might try not using "he has stutter" to excuse everything anymore.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 07:41 AM
10

I remember when this sub had less than 10,000. Back then colleges didn't even know what MRAs were.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 04:53 PM
4

I shortly dated a girl whose daddy was killed by a serial killer when she was 12. Serious daddy issues.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/20 05:04 PM
16

There is no need to propose anything. That difference isn't oppression any more than the 'height gap' between men and women is proof of oppression. Its just reality.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 04:09 PM
1

I'm having a little trouble understanding this. Does his foreskin get tighter or constrict somehow. Maybe some skin stretching exercises would fix the problem?...
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:11 PM
4

What problems is he talking about specifically? There are actual problems people can have. He might not need a full circumcision removal, maybe just a loosening or something? I would suggest not subjecting a baby (your baby) to invasive surgeries for a problem that might not manifest until adulthood.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 07:36 AM
17

Sounds to me like she was trying to live out her adolescent fantasies that she never could do herself through a couple of teenagers. Then she tried to get revenge on the boy when he didn't live up to her fantasy.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 07:05 PM
2

It was the history teacher. Even after she got pregnant.... DAMN, but I'd still hit it.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 10:28 PM
2

I know plenty of 27 year old women who look like 18 year olds, especially with good makeup. 15yrs boys would bang the hell out of 18 year old girls.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 10:26 PM
1

Where’s the concern about low numbers of women in the mining industry? Or deep sea fishing? Or any other dangerous occupation that is predominantly male? The ONLY categories left in colleges that aren't majority women are STEM. Thats it. Every other category of college degrees has a majority women in it. When women are a majority, equality+, in STEM then women will be a majority in every category. After getting that they'll go after job categories.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/19 07:18 AM
2

Feminist equality is actually 'Equality+'. Women must be equal OR BETTER or they are oppressed.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 09:24 PM
6

Mother: it doesn't matter who the father is. I deserve money from every guy I've fucked! Fuck her.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 03:34 PM
5

https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Male-Power-Warren-Farrell/dp/0425181448 Here is a good start.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 07:33 PM
1

The entire article has no perspective for anyone to understand anything they're reading. Its 200% "WOMEN" and nothing else. Imagine a glorious future where only men are killed and no women.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 06:02 PM
38

Lets not start making wild speculations for a case we know very little about.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 05:50 PM
2

They can't technically 'force' you to sign up. What they can do is deny you access to a great many services and rights to 'encourage' you to sign up. Seeing as you weren't in the country all these encouragements didn't apply to you. Good luck figuring out this puzzle.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 10:01 PM
5

They usually send you a couple postcards when you turn 18.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 09:59 PM
7

How about dramatically fake your own suicide so that she decides it isn't worth it to raise the kid on her own and she gets an abortion. Then, afterwards, miraculous resurrection!
/r/MensRights06/07/17 06:07 PM
8

I too wish for a world that needed neither of them.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:05 AM
5

Its available online now. http://theredpillmovie.com/screenings/buy-rent-stream/
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:04 AM
12

Chose your preferred option from here. http://theredpillmovie.com/screenings/buy-rent-stream/
/r/MensRights10/03/17 06:27 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=infographic&restrict_sr=on
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:38 PM
1

Feminism isn't scientific or even debatable rationally. Its irrational victim mongering the way it is now.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 09:48 PM
46

Fuck you OP. This article isn't blaming men or boys at all. COMPLETELY unnecessary title and post. A single mention of a very similar case doesn't mean shite.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 05:34 PM
1

Where are the mass organizations speaking on their behalf? Where is SheforHe? RIGHT HERE! or for humor here.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 05:59 PM
2

Well which is it, is it becoming more widespread or mostly associated with the matrix? I meant both.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:17 AM
3

It's possible. I think however it's simply that the red pill is mostly associated with the Matrix and very very few people outside know about the red pill on Reddit. Either way it's nothing we can't handle and get past to spread the message out.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 11:33 PM
3

People are getting a little over defensive. The movie is a big deal to a lot of people and its hard to keep cool. I traveled overnight to see the movie and to see Cassie there and I'm glad I went. If you don't have Netflix when the movie is released hit me up and I might be able to get you a copy.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 05:08 PM
1

Sometimes intention of words doesn't translate over the internet well. I know you meant well.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:45 PM
5

The official release date is March 7th. It will be available on Netflix and DVD release then.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:40 PM
3

The phrase "the red pill" has become rather widespread. I've seen it used to describe several movies and youtube documentaries at this point. The problem is that it came from The Matrix movie and so its easy for more people to pick up on it. I do believe Cassie's movie is the first to use the phrase but she has no unique claim on it. Ah well, such is life.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 04:39 PM
1

Typically the reason you see or hear pretty much absolutely nothing about it because it's terrible and they don't want people to know how terrible it is. On the other hand when a film is great everybody loves to talk about it as you can see from The Red Pill.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 11:44 PM
5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvrldsTqCws&index=15&list=PLyRwczIsk2BDC4IqTZSG-K9X_YyUZ9tBA I saw The Mask You Live In when the Honey Badgers reviewed the movie. I was cusious about it for a long time but then it turned out to be an amazing mess of editing and stupid arguments. link to the HBB review included.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:42 PM
1

There are so many issues to deal with and different countries and different places in the world have different issues to deal with so its not easy to make any one single organized list. Like another poster said look on the right for links. One or two of them I've contributed.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:27 PM
8

The Berkeley showing was awesome. I drove overnight to get there and it was worth the drive.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 07:01 PM
1

http://ozcrowd.com/campaign/3370 http://theredpillmovie.com/see-the-film/ come on bitches I want to see the movie in theater! https://www.tugg.com/events/the-red-pill-eugene
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:23 AM
1

I doubt he could be as bad as Hillary would be.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 11:54 PM
12

Trump is the most feminist unfriendly President in quite a while.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 02:20 PM
1

You are in luck then! You can watch the whole documentary all over again. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvrldsTqCws Tell me what you think after you've watched it again.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 09:37 PM
11

It's a reference to the Matrix movie. What do you have against that movie?
/r/MensRights25/10/16 05:39 PM
1

If you live in the area then invite local people to see it. Spread interest.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:50 AM
2

They have teams that track down people who have TVs and aren't paying the license. It's the most common crime in the UK. You get a fine for not paying.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 01:17 AM
30

From the article: This research proved that the BBC had never covered a single case of a victim of false rape allegations who took their own lives in its entire history
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:30 PM
4

I will be at the showing in Berkeley, California on Nov. 1, 2016. 2 weeks and I get to meet Dr. Warren Farrell and Cassie Jaye. Will I see any of you there?
/r/MensRights19/10/16 04:28 PM
1

Feminism has been dragging us to hell for 150 years. We aren't going to turn that around overnight. They have human nature on their side, the insatiable drive to protect and shield women in danger. We have a lot of work and a lot of perseverance ahead of us to set things right.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 04:00 AM
1

The Badgers have a private discussion room for contributing members. Its a peer review process. This video only became public 2 hours ago. Not sure how you ran into it 12 hours ago.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:54 PM
1

The Honey Badgers usually post videos privately first for the group to review then it becomes public a day or two later.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:26 PM
1

It was private yesterday, it is public now.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:25 PM
2

Part 2 is still being worked on.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:24 PM
3

Yah, well other countries have Detroit.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:46 AM
1

You could have looked a little harder. Karen Straughan – Toxic Masculinity & TOXIC FEMININITY.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 04:17 AM
1

And we see where their idiocracy brings us.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:42 AM
3

Neither of your sources tells us how common each TYPE of circumcision is in those countries. They purposely avoid measuring that so folks, such as yourself, will assume the worse scenario. Please find us some sources that track the TYPES of circumcision and how common those are each performed in every country. As well as MGM types and rates for comparison of course.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 04:12 AM
4

Most female circumcision is on par with most male circumcision practiced. FGM is usually portrayed as the worst possible procedure and MGM is portrayed as the least worst possible procedure for propaganda reasons.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:50 AM
4

This movie has nothing to do with r/theredpill they are two completely separate things.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 05:53 PM
1

The Honey Badgers had a fundraiser to buy recording equipment just for this event. So yes there will be recording.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 05:52 PM
5

You're making this too complicated. Men are more likely to take risks. This leads to more men starting up companies.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 05:02 PM
3

That is a terrible comparison.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 04:23 PM
1

Here is an update: http://www.feedthebadger.com/projects/support-the-red-pills-premier/ Among those planning to participate in the Q&A are Suzanne Venker, Kristal Garcia, Michael Kimmel, Fred Hayward and Tim Goldich.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:20 AM
1

Not yet. More details should come out as we get closer to the date.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 04:24 PM
1

But because of this, it's safe to assume that in a country dominated by men, they'll usually be pretty good at addressing their own issues. please provide some examples of this happening.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:14 PM
2

This is nothing. You all should have seen the youtube livestream of her speech at the HeForShe 2nd year anniversary last week. It was brutal and barely a step above 4chan in the live comments. It was great.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:07 PM
1

You should keep up with the Honey Badgers or others more. Cassie Jaye has invited a number of feminists to the showing as well. There will also be a q&a for the film where she is expecting to field their questions. Its too late to stop some notoriety from happening.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:04 PM
1

The Honey Badgers are going to the premier showing in NY and have been asked to help with the premier showing by Cassie Jaye. They seem very sure the movie is going to be great. They might be running a fund raiser soon to fund airfare and travel accommodations for the showing. I'll be donating if that comes up.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 08:58 PM
7

I'm going to try saying 'infant genital cutting'.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 12:14 AM
5

I'll try some other ways of wording the title. Maybe the next one will hit it big.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 11:54 PM
11

Welcome. We've discussed the situation in Spain a number of times before. Is it true that the suicide rate of men in Spain has doubled over the last decade?
/r/MensRights25/09/16 11:18 PM
1

see: kilts
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:35 AM
3

Propaganda like that would fit in perfectly in North Korea.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 03:03 AM
1

I saw that wine in the video. I'm not in South Africa. Try Oregon USA instead. It sounds more exotic when I say "my country" though ;) What I have around is Badger Hill wine and not Honey Badger wine because we only have non-honey badgers in North America. I hear from Alison you are going to NY for The Red Pill premier. So the wine might have to wait a while because sending you there takes priority.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 04:21 AM
3

I knew you were the right one to call girlwriteswhat. Now I just gotta send you some of my country's Badger wine. Hit me up in the Skype Badger chat if ya like.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 08:23 AM
2

I've been where you are. You'll get past it.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 08:36 AM
3

We are allready treated as a threat. For existing.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 06:29 AM
1

That is a b.s. argument. This is the exact kind of reasoning that they used to derail the entire green movement. "LOOK OVER THERE! A small group of black-boot, black-mask wearing thugs destroyed that chain grocery/coffee/electronics store! How can you justify your movement when 1% of them are violent?!? I was a hardcore greenie in the 90s. I've seen how this argument plays out endlessly. Fuck that. Fuck them. Fuck your argument. If you want to know why those black-booted thugs smashed up Starbuc…
/r/MensRights20/09/16 06:24 AM
2

Further, most people don't know that Gandhi was only one of MANY Indian independence activists and fighters. He isn't even the most celebrated activist in India. I believe, could be wrong there. Many Indian freedom fighters and groups used violent tactics which were also rather successful in expelling the British. I've heard even that Gandhi's absolute insistence on non-violence may have even set India's eventual freedom back a couple years. I'm not advocating any kind of violence here. Just rel…
/r/MensRights20/09/16 06:09 AM
3

Thanks. I haven't seen her specific speech yet, but I've heard about it.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:36 PM
1

Bernie said a few relevant things here and there. Though he has been dragged into the regressive left rhetoric a lot.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 06:45 PM
4

What a bunch of whiny, mistaken twats y'all are. CONTEXT. Context. Paul's speech there is the final speech of a 3 Day conference. Three long days of hearing about men's struggles and sufferings. His speech was well received by the hundreds of people there. /u/girlwriteswhat can tell it like it was.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:13 AM
1

Oh, that stuff. Never mind. No offence.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 05:48 AM
1

I'm sorry. Every one here came on a little strong on the topic. Its an old discussion we've had many times. What they meant to say was it doesn't matter what you want to call yourself. As long as we have the same overall goals perhaps we can work together for the better. What do you think would help?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 05:42 AM
2

Interviews like this are great. It shows that the message is getting out there and not just being repeated in an echo chamber of our own making. We need the world to hear what and why we do and not just each other. The word is spreading.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:12 AM
1

What do you mean by 'Manosphere'?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:04 AM
1

/r/feminism bans posts to /r/feminism so its all good.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 02:07 AM
1

100% true. But sometimes comments get downvoted by regular people. We have no way to tell CTR brigading apart from regular downvotes. It makes judging anything said about Clinton very difficult.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:44 PM
4

CTR has been blatantly on reddit for months. And reddit, being a for profit corp, treats CTR money like any other advertiser's money: enough money buys them free range all over as much of reddit as they like. They mostly stick to /r/politics but any big enough post involving Clinton brings them out.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:40 PM
1

So why did you archive this particular article? i would think good articles don't need archiving?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 05:38 AM
1

I know. I wanted to show y'all it has a history here. I wanted you to see the kind of controversy it stirred up. What happened is they just stopped updating it and let it expire. If you want to know exactly what happened ask Paul Elam. It was his site.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:38 AM
2

It hasn't been active for years, but it exists. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/k93l1/registerhercom_hitting_the_mark_listing_false/
/r/MensRights04/09/16 04:40 AM
5

We have a registry for false accusers. As soon as she is officially on the legal record as being a false accuser we could add her to the list also.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 09:10 PM
7

from the article: 'previous generations had not expected to be in communication with their parents every day'. Translation: we managed to destroy relationships between fathers and children before and we would have kept getting away with it if it wasn't for you meddling kids modern communication! Jesus fucking christ.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:14 AM
-1

oops. I meant he didn't deserve the downvotes. Ahh well, reddit be fickle and cruel at times.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 10:19 PM
3

This exact video has been discussed probably a dozen times here. Stills an occasional repost isn't bad. Thus OPs smiley face.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 04:48 PM
278

A woman has sex with a dozen men and they call her a slut, a guy does it and they call him gay. Inequality!
/r/MensRights01/09/16 04:45 PM
1

FIRST GOAL CLEARED! Yay. edit: and wow, the second goal was hit hours later!
/r/MensRights01/09/16 02:43 AM
1

Late 80s and early 90s. USA. Low income housing, food stamps, and a few other bits I'm sure.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 07:09 PM
1

My own parents divorced due to personal issues between them and not us kids. They managed to be good friends a little while after the divorce again. For many years we did many many things together as a family even though they were divorced: dinners, beach days, camping trips even. There are good fathers out there and there are good mothers out there with or without marriage. If you think you can trust him then I won't challenge you on that.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 06:29 PM
1

I know because my parents managed to be friends again a couple years after the divorce. We had many years of family dinners together and trips to the beach together even though they were divorced. They told us kids that they made up their own agreement, though I never saw any of the actual paperwork myself. as far as I know... ;)
/r/MensRights30/08/16 06:21 PM
1

We were on welfare for years. Low-income housing and plenty of other supports. As far as I know the government never bothered my dad at all. So I can't know either way for sure.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 04:42 AM
1

I don't know if this will help. Maybe it will. IANAL. When my parents divorced they worked out a support payment agreement without the courts because, thankfully, both my parents loved us kids and they are awesome. Maybe its possible to work out an agreement that you two can agree to and sign as some kind of official plan. Reddit legal folks: Is it possible to make up a legally enforceable child support plan, that will keep to government goons away? Is it possible to show it to them and say, "we…
/r/MensRights30/08/16 12:29 AM
6

Until women get drafted into an actual war and learn what Duty really means I'm going to keep using this example.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:44 AM
3

Dude. Women getting drafted only happened 10 WEEKS AGO. 70 days ago. 2.5 months ago. Things that happened that recently are still current events. Until its not even the same 'current year' then it isn't historical context yet.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 04:42 AM
8

They still complain about not having the vote ONE HUNDRED years ago. We can complain about the draft for at least till the end of the year.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 01:23 AM
1

What else did you learn about them? They could have thousands of allies and comrades in their fight if you hook them up with other MHRAs around these parts.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 03:21 AM
1

A country/people that doesn't make the most use of its citizen's talents and abilities is a poor one.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:44 AM
2

The problem is that many people aren't useless. They could achieve more if they had the opportunity.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:30 AM
2

We don't give them the printers, we give them access to the printers. What good is a worker without any tools? We help them get access to the tools they need to be productive. Its better than giving them the bare pittance they need to merely live on.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:30 AM
1

The problem is we provide people "welfare" of "relief" we don't help them get what they need to succeed. They get enough to trudge along accomplishing nothing instead of getting access to what they need to prosper. Capitalism means access to capital, it means access to the means of production. The welfare state we have now doesn't give people capital access. I suggest that in the future people are given access to 3D-printers and other machines of production so they have a chance to produce rathe…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:01 AM
2

Its my plan to buy some of their shirts. Hopefully I can run into fellow random Honey Badger fans myself sometime. Also donating as well.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 07:00 AM
1

Direct link to the fundraiser: http://www.feedthebadger.com/projects/the-badgers-to-infiltrate-the-property-market-disguised-as-a-house/
/r/MensRights23/08/16 11:54 PM
1

A reminder of who the Honey Badgers are. They were expelled from the Calgary Expo for having the wrong friends and associations. The most blatant CENSORSHIP of ideas or discussion you can find. http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/2015/04/18/go-home-gamer-girl-press-release-on-unjust-banishment-from-calgary-expo/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook https://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3x22wk/a_timeline_of_the_honey_badger_brigade_expulsion/
/r/MensRights23/08/16 03:15 AM
1

Instead of that stickied AMA post taking up the top of the page for the last 2 months how about /u/FFXIV_Machinist list all the ICMI 2016 London speeches and interviews there instead? These interviews will have questions and answers better than most of what we could expect from reddit posts.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:08 PM
1

You are seeing those headlines because they are pushing propaganda. Its a deliberate narrative they keep pushing constantly. "Women are being victimized! Women are being oppressed!" Can't let up on that can we.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 04:33 AM
1

Yes. That is why Hillary Clinton isn't in jail now for her email scandal. They couldn't prove she intended to release classified information and secrets. In the end all they could say for certain is she acted in an incredibly incompetent, reckless, and unprofessional manner.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:48 AM
1

He is Mark Pearson. He spoke at the ICMI London 2016 10 July 2016: Conference - Mark Pearson, 'Facing my Waterloo'
/r/MensRights16/08/16 08:58 PM
2

Nice cross-posting OP. Getting some pretty good exposure these days. Looks like having an MP at the conference is really paying off.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 10:55 AM
1

Hey, the Chinese love good looking American actors just as much as we do. Hollywood is a global business.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 09:05 AM
3

Be sure to watch ALL the ICMI 2016 London speeches folks!
/r/MensRights14/08/16 05:34 AM
1

Not as a speaker, but there is always going as simply an audience member as well.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 07:59 AM
2

Human rights is not a gendered issue. There are MANY women fighting for the human rights of men and boys. Check out the ICMI 2016 London. Several women speaker and all great speeches. I recommend watching a few. The KEYNOTE speaker was Erin Pizzey. Janet Bloomfield (a.k.a. Judgy Bitch) spoke at the conference. Janice Fiamengo. Karen Straughan spoke there and the rest of the Honey Badgers were there also. I don't think Shoe0nHead was there, but she is also handy to have on our side.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 07:27 AM
2

Human rights is not a gendered issue. There are MANY women fighting for the human rights of men and boys. Check out the ICMI 2016 London. Several women speaker and all great speeches. I recommend watching a few. The KEYNOTE speaker was Erin Pizzey. Janet Bloomfield (a.k.a. Judgy Bitch) spoke at the conference. Janice Fiamengo. Karen Straughan spoke there and the rest of the Honey Badgers were there also. I don't think Shoe0nHead was there, but she is also handy to have on our side.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 06:43 AM
1

You dear sweet child... So much you are clueless about. Where to start? AmericanTelephone&Telegraph and telephone calls over their network are PROTECTED BY LAW to be free from censorship and monitoring as telephone calls have Title II Common Carrier status. The company providing this Common Carrier service (telephone calls) must also bide by Common Carrier restrictions, no censorship or monitoring, to their customers as well as the government must unless they have a legal warrant. And what the h…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:00 PM
3

R.T.F.U.A. Read The Freaking User Agreement Its all been spelled out from day one of Facebook opening in the User Agreement. Everything on Facebook belongs to Facebook.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 03:40 AM
3

Facebook is a public commons. No it isn't. Everything on Facebook is owned BY Facebook. Every comment you and everyone else makes there now belongs to Facebook. Saying 'Facebook is a public commons.' is like saying the back seat of the guy's vehicle you are carpooling with is a public commons. It isn't. An actual public bus might be a public commons but the backseat of the guy you car pool with is not. He can change the rules and kick you out of his car any time for any reason. So can Facebook.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:31 AM
2

I HAVE A BETTER IDEA! I'll have more details fleshed out tomorrow but for now this is the basic plan: Prostitute fundraiser for this fine gentleman. I'm fucking serious. How many $500 a night prostitutes can we line up for this guy? What better way to say fuck you to the system than by helping him fuck some hot women? And this would be good publicity for the prostitutes at the same time. They are the kind of women who WANT their name to be shared and published.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 05:03 AM
1

Sarcasm is a form of higher intelligence and understanding. It is a good first step.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 07:29 PM
1

Constant improvement is the path to enlightenment.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 06:07 PM
1

What a short and crappy video. The HONEY BADGERS have a much much better discussion on this exact topic here. Rantzerker 60: Poptrigger, triggered by pink tax. I highly recommend everyone watch this one instead.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 05:46 AM
-3

They are getting anxious because we have been telling them for their entire lives that "boys are better at STEM and girls are being oppressed and micro-aggressioned out of them." And then we go out of our ways to create "special tests just for them so they can perform better. But you know NO FUCKING PRESSURE girls." Why would they be anxious from that?
/r/MensRights28/06/16 07:06 PM
4

TIL there are 13 year olds on here. I'm getting too fucking old.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:01 PM
6

Are you joking? Please tell me you aren't joking. That sounds awesome.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:55 PM
1

Its sad seeing /r/mensrights invaded by tumblerinas.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:40 AM
-1

You're drunk. Go home.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:38 AM
-1

So is signing a loan contract to buy a house.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:25 AM
-2

This post has nothing to do with a marriage.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 05:10 AM
1

You have no fucking idea what concern trolling even is do you?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 11:22 PM
1

I don't have an account for the linked site and I am also not Australian. Someone who does should copy and paste your comment to that site.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 01:25 PM
13

Contract law is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 01:02 PM
7

The Honey Badgers talk about this often. I don't know why they don't get more attention here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxXR_xN8O_4 Honey Badger Radio 58: Advocacy to Activism 2
/r/MensRights11/06/16 05:18 AM
5

He should call them 4 times a day to report planning to have sex with himself. The more details the better.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:45 PM
8

I still can't believe Trigglypuff walked (heh) herself into that trap.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:33 AM
1

I'm glad I came back to read all the comments on this post and discussion. It is harder to see the full depth of your thinking when you are talking off the cuff (somewhat) on the radio show. You used to be a writer, of course (and still are?), and I could also enjoy reading your writings in a bathtub like your editor used to. Though I can tell that you put a lot of thought into your view points and you see the long view of civilizations, culture, and societies it is so much better when I can see…
/r/MensRights27/05/16 07:19 AM
1

I don't have time to look it up right now, but there is a term for breaking up responses into tiny bits and replying to each and every bit. Its annoying and distracting when you do it too much. I used to do it a lot more but I have worked on making my replies more comprehensive rather than fragmented. You can reply to an entire paragraph at a time with your own paragraph. You don't need to break everything down into individual sentences or less. Give it a try a little.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:56 PM
1

Bingo. And now days we are too divided to make any kind of meaningful demands or changes to the capitalist system that is screwing us all over for everything. Have you heard of the "Women's Equality Party" in the U.K.?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:46 PM
2

Well if you need any help getting access to their youtube stuff send me a message sometime. Torrents are very easy to get going.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 12:15 AM
3

MHRA Men's HUMAN RIGHTS Activism Human Rights shouldn't be a partisan issue.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:50 PM
2

Shame your internet is restricted. Wherever you happen to be. Do you mean what and who are the Honey Badgers? Or do you mean what specifically is discussed in the video? The Honey Badgers are an awesome group of folks, mostly women (awesome women), who run The Honey Badger Brigade over at http://honeybadgerbrigade.com . Hope you can access this one in China. They do many radio shows online about Mens Rights, family law, gender inequalties and divisions, world politics, etc.. They also do some si…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:20 PM
5

You watched Honey Badger Radio 55: Does the 3rd World Need Feminism? recently, didn't you? 2:19:00 for the discussion on OPs post to begin.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 07:02 AM
4

I agree that the nature of conversation in this sub has changed quite a bit over the last year to be much more... teenage, I suppose. Facebook lite maybe. But on the counterpoint this sub is much more active these days. More posts and more commentators. We need fresh members and action here. It does come with lots of weak and lame posts though. Too many screen shots and facebook conversations for sure. I would like some stronger content posted. Instead of unsubscribing I adjust my focus to where…
/r/MensRights22/05/16 08:55 PM
3

I watched the MSNBC Town Hall hour, yes the entire hour, for Trump. He is a master manipulator. That weasel wheedled and twisted words for the entire hour not saying a single damned thing of substance. I could see Chris Matthews getting more frustrated the whole time because Trump wouldn't say anything useful the entire time. Trump knows what he is doing not that I have a clue what it is.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 04:04 AM
2

Feel free to give me a heads up when you see that happening. I don't want us to become an overly biased group towards any political direction over the other. I'll back free expression of differing opinions anytime.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:01 PM
2

I'm a Bernie supporter. But the article is what it is.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:35 PM
8

And BOOM! goes the dynamite. My highest comment ever is in the /r/science posting of this article. I think I've waited long enough to avoid any possible accusations of brigading or the like. Check it out. The problem is that people are using the wrong word. There is no pay gap, however there is an earnings gap. If you work more hours overall you earn more. If you stay in your field of work longer and have more experience you earn more. Go figure. Its right there in the title. "Why women earn les…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:34 PM
2

What? They/we have been pushing away tradcons? Damnit! As myself being a hardcore Bernie supporter and probably liberal I say that is a shitty thing for us to be doing here as well. When and where did that happen?
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:23 PM
7

That kind of talk makes me think they have been so brainwashed that they think basic human functions, such as sex, adrenaline, hunger, sleep, etc., are signs of demonic, evil patriarchy out to destroy them. Its like some folks these days referring to their own internal thought processes as "head mates". No you don't have multiple people living in your head, that is just called "thinking". They have been so conditioned against any kind of healthy, functional sexuality that even thinking about it …
/r/MensRights21/05/16 01:46 PM
62

I like it. They are bringing MRAs up to the level of a Presidential candidate who could possibly be the next president. In a national magazine no less. Whats even funnier is that they think comparing us to Trump will make people hate us. Do they not realize how many people are supporting and voting for Trump? Sure, plenty of people are against Trump, but so many aren't either. This is one of those no publicity is bad publicity situations.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 01:28 PM
-1

Not really. Just outright deleting an article and putting NOTHING in its place doesn't contribute anything. Anyone can hit the delete button. How about starting by eliminating some of the worse sections, listed by /u/hashtagwindbag in this thread, and replacing them with more neutral and rational explanations and how about some academically referenced sources.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 04:09 AM
3

If anyone is wondering how things could be that bad in Canadian government this video will show how. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is The Pope of Feminism. Its terrifying actually. I had to stop 4 or 5 times while watching this video. Hysterics like Elbow-Gate were inevitable at this point.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 05:47 PM
4

Unfortunately the internet has become a breeding ground for group-think and social isolation. People don't understand what the internet is yet they all have it on their phones and on their tablets and they are shoved into a world they don't understand and they deal with it like highschool social cliques. It used to be in order to get on the internet you had to want to get on the internet and you had to intentionally go online and you had to learn the rules in order to understand what you were pa…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:54 AM
4

That wasn't throwing them a bone. DS9 didn't have MRM goal or anything like that. The show being in a constant location in space rather than a ship traveling all over the place allowed them to explore topics the other ST series couldn't as easily. Be careful to not start projecting onto the show. That is an excellent list of topics and themes explored in the show you came up with there. I'll keep that all in mind next time I watch the series through again.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:17 AM
1

paging /u/girlwriteswhat for a guest speaker on HoneyBadgerRadio
/r/MensRights12/05/16 08:34 PM
6

Anyone else noticing how often they use words like "disparities" and "disproportionate" without ever explaining exactly how or in which way those words apply to the situation? Both those words essentially mean 'unfair', but unfair treatment can be positive as well as negative.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 10:29 PM
9

On the flip side if they win this then that opens the door to challenging any program that focuses only on girls. That sounds fun...
/r/MensRights09/05/16 10:26 PM
2

I wish we would increase NASA's budget by about 20 fold...
/r/MensRights09/05/16 09:15 PM
2

Speaking of massive government spending I often refer people to this wonderful lecture The Secret History of Silicon Valley. Its a good chapter of historical info to add to your library.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:23 AM
7

Try talking to some of the HoneyBadgers. As they are also women they can probably relate very well to your experiences. Maybe write a guest article for them. Just as good as any blog I think and they have an audience allready so what you write will be read by many. Blog as well if you like, of course. I'm not saying you shouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:14 AM
1

Thank you for elaborating further. This is what discussion on the internet (and in general) should be like.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 11:11 PM
2

Indeed. That is a very reasonable analysis of the situation. I often wonder if what is happening in the US is a happenstance mistake of history. We have this giant, resource filled land that we happened to take over just before global industrialization kicked in. Sure we had to kill off most of the natives to take it over, but that is another discussion. The US is a rather young country in a global view of it all and all this wealth and power almost fell into our laps. After WWII we had enormous…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 10:24 PM
2

Did you look at who the author is? Check it out real quick. This is going to sound conspiracy theorist crazy..., but I think it is a conspiracy. Piece by piece they have spent the last 50 years dismantling any social cohesion and people's ability to work together to achieve large social or economic goals. You must have heard about the Gloria Steinem - CIA links by now? Or its the unintended, deleterious side effects of moving towards a completely automated and computerized civilization. Terrible…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:28 PM
3

Damn, its nice seeing someone else who sees the bigger picture here. Have you read or heard about this one? The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Parents are Going Broke. Honestly, I haven't read it myself yet, but I sure mean to soon.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:14 PM
3

The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Parents are Going Broke. book description: In this revolutionary exposé, Harvard Law School bankruptcy expert Elizabeth Warren and financial consultant Amelia Tyagi show that today's middle-class parents are increasingly trapped by financial meltdowns. Astonishingly, sending mothers to work has made families more vulnerable to financial disaster than ever before. Today's two-income family earns 75% more money than its single-income counterpart of a generatio…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:07 PM
2

Maybe you should try talking to your girl about raising children before getting her pregnant. Then you would know what she plans to do about getting pregnant.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 08:44 PM
2

f.y.i. Trump's wife is an immigrant. She is/was a legal immigrant though. Trump is against illegal immigrants.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 08:48 PM
6

Yes, I do think Bernie will give a shit about men's rights. Its not perfect though, nor is he. He voted for VAWA sadly and he has repeated the wage gap myth a couple times. He doesn't wallow in it though. I think he shows intelligence enough to see through the misinformation. His stance for protecting gun manufacturers from frivolous law suits shows that he doesn't cave in to emotional appeals like most politicians, like Clinton. That is my opinion. Hard to know for sure.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 08:45 PM
1

Try looking into the Canadian constitution... it gets worse.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 07:00 AM
15

The first step it to admit you are shit at googling. Good on ya.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 07:17 PM
3

Examples?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 07:04 AM
1

Who wrote this? It looks like a 12 year old wrote it? Actually I wrote better than this at 12.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 11:11 PM
5

Nah. I watched the entire thing last night. The speakers are used to these tactics now. The protesters lost the game there. The speakers just kept on talking over them till the audience could hear what they had to say. There were a couple standing ovations for the speakers in the video.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/16 07:39 PM
0

It's completely random, gendered violence. ftfy
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:55 PM
1

I know nothing about what is being advertised here, but going by the picture they appear rather equal in that picture. Same size, same height, weight, clothes, body type and fitness. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, sometimes advertising is just advertising.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 06:14 AM
1

Meh. Double meh. Sometimes advertisements use a little violence to catch people's attention. I don't see any emphasis on the sexes in that picture that would make it about their sex being different. It is just advertising that just happens to have a man and a woman and it just happens to be the girl throwing the punch. What if it were two guys? What if it were two girls? What if they were star trek aliens?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:42 AM
1

How about tell us your position on a dozen or so topics that you consider to be liberal positions? That way we know what you mean by liberal. I'm probably liberal like you. I like Bernie also. But two little things like that don't clear up much for understanding.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:37 AM
2

Men's rights facebook groups have been steadily being taken down since they instituted their reporting system 2 years ago. Its been discussed on this subreddit numerous times. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4e1r2r/anti_feminism_australias_facebook_page_with_44000/
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:27 AM
3

Makes sense. Most people in prison are men and most men aren't gay. So the likely people to try to take inappropriate actions with the prisoners are women.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 12:49 AM
1

Maybe I'm too cynical in my old age. Are these fathers there because too many of those kids have no fathers in their homes and this is one of the few times they have to be encouraged by any kind of father figure at all? Or are these fathers there just to give the kids an extra little boost for the heck of it?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 06:08 PM
4

And people sometimes say, "No I don't want a second bowl of ice cream." Then they still eat a second bowl of ice cream anyways. How does that fit into your world view?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:24 PM
3

Talk to your kid about what you are doing. Explain it to him while you do it. Let him help if and when you can. The most important education anyone ever gets is from their parents. Talk to your children. Engage with them. Not just as a child, but as a person. You seem to be doing great so far.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 09:04 AM
8

I posted this reference book 6 months ago. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3q6oz2/a_reference_book_of_mens_issues_dozens_of_topics/ It was sidebarred on this sub then here https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/other It was started 6 months before that by the author here https://np.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/2w82vr/primer_reference_book_of_mens_issues_feedback/ I didn't know the author had made its own sub for posting though. That is new to me. Its good to see the best mater…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 07:12 AM
1

Not too long ago she was still holding onto the idea that there are still good feminist subsets out there and she still called herself a feminist even. I guess even she couldn't hold that line in the sand forever. I'm a little sorry actually that one of the last, good, original feminists had to give up that definition.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:11 AM
1

Thanks for posting this.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:18 AM
6

There are many Men's Activist organizations out there doing real work to improve the world. What we do here may not be all that much. But THEM out there are doing a lot.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 03:45 PM
5

She most likely has read the carefully. But she knows all she has to do is say the magic word "misogyny" and everyone will line up and take marching orders to do whatever she says. No need to read the bill themselves.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 01:53 AM
10

The problem is that too many people are taking two years of medical school then running off to be a local family practitioner somewhere. Then after 20 years of treating sprains and other minor stuff for 4 days a week they retire. Or nurses and other low level stuff. They need more people to take specialties and do the serious medical career so they are upping the pay scales. Because its more often men who specialize and do the higher paying skill sets it means the NHS will end up paying more men…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 05:03 AM
2

Divide and conqueror. Strong families means strong societies and strong culture. You think the decline of unions, the decline of workers rights, the decline of good paying jobs and the decline of marriage and families happened at the same time by coincidence? They wanted to stop society from advancing so they could take everything for themselves and leave us fighting each other for child care and alimony payments.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:22 AM
2

It is a conspiracy theory. The reality is though that most of history IS in fact actual conspiracies. Many, many of the big events in history are set off by a couple of people at the top making a few big decisions. "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist." And the greatest trick the 1% ever pulled was convincing the public that all 'conspiracy theories' are automatically crazy and the ramblings of nut jobs.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:29 AM
20

While this is a awful let us keep in mind that this r/mensrights and not r/hatingonterriblepeople If we are going to talk about this then keeping on topic would be nice.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 08:05 PM
2

Can I get an age breakdown of when people die from these cancers? I'm curious.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 06:14 AM
1

They constantly claim any subreddit they don't like is run and controlled by MRA's. I've seen that claim made for a dozen subreddits allready.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:35 PM
2

Could he be Patient Zero?...
/r/MensRights17/03/16 04:46 PM
3

But which ONE in particular? That is what interests me.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:14 PM
5

I've always wondered who the little bird was that whispered in her ear to set her in this direction? Its unlikely that she ended up going in this direction entirely on her own.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:46 PM
1

He wanted to play baseball because that was what his father wanted from/for him growing up. He did it for his father. Warren Farrell talked about it a couple times.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:44 PM
2

For paraphrasing I use single quotations 'like this'. Its my thing, I'm not sure everyone understands it as I mean it. Your mileage may vary.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:42 PM
4

This is my take on the Democratic side. In the Democratic Presidential debates last night Men's Rights issues were front and center. It was awesome! Of course they never identified them as "Men's" rights issues, but we know they are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o56pLqPYcEo Jump to 1:01:00 for the candidates showing up. Suicide, homelessness, fatherless families and children, the largest prisoner population in the WORLD, and education. All of these problems were each separately discussed/brou…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:48 PM
2

Lets hope she gets caught breaking her parole conditions...
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:31 PM
3

tldr: evil men forcing women to be stay at home wives! So alimony should be PERMANENT forever. They always love to fall back to 'traditional' gender roles when it benefits them.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 06:50 AM
0

men can't have medical abortions....
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 10:26 PM
2

Did you try to educate him on that?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 10:16 PM
29

I'm not a Trump hater, but are the American People that dumb? It is a combination. Yes they are that dumb because those in power and the MSM have been intentionally dumbing down the voter education for decades. Also the current Congress and Senate are the worst in over a century by several measures. Least productive ever, most obstructive ever, and least popular ever. Congress has had single digit percentage approval ratings for years. The American public hates them soo much they are willing to …
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 10:09 PM
5

Subscribe to Honey Badger e-mail for well written, mostly daily articles delivered to your inbox. This is today's article that showed up for me. Subscription is all the very way at the bottom. They should make the button bigger and easier to find.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:05 PM
1

One point of disagreement. I'm no feminist at all. But when it comes to abortion in the US there actually is a 'war' against women in this particular area. The politicians use abortion as divide and conquer tool to keep people fighting each other.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 06:40 PM
3

Yeah, that has been bothering me this whole time. That guy has a perfectly good brain in there. Surely there must be someway to communicate with him. What does he have to say about all of this?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:00 PM
8

That is exactly why South Park created "PC Bros". To highlight how crazy SJW beliefs are. White, college going, stereotyped men are the only group SJWs and feminists can comprehend being bad people.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 05:23 PM
1

Many people have asked for this sort of help before. A quick search will turn up plenty of posts. I do have TWO suggestions though. First read up on coverture laws. The Honey Badgers and have talked about this often, especially Karen so look to them for further sources. Here is a video of hers for starters https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHkGZvC0z4I Why? Husband's were once responsible for their wife's crimes. Literally. Husbands would go to jail for their wives' crimes under many circumstances.…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 10:29 PM
9

"Business as usual".
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:47 PM
1

I went ahead and reported the post for being lame.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:18 PM
2

If your lawyer is no good then these lawyers might be better http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:55 PM
1

True enough and a fair position to have. I'm sticking with Bernie Sanders though. I think he is intelligent enough to see through the gender bullshit if he only gets the facts before him. There are plenty of intelligent people who don't like him so who knows how its going to go.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:44 AM
1

Then who?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:27 PM
8

There was an Survivor Island season where they separated the men and women into different groups. The men got everything done and were building a camp hut. The women had nothing and ran out or resources. Eventually they combined the groups back together. I have no idea where to find the vids though.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:51 AM
2

That is why I am voting Bernie Sanders.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 01:34 AM
2

Then suggest an alternative group. I don't know anything about them. That is why they make a good blank slate organization for mentioning.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 08:16 PM
4

The privatization of US prisons is an exaggerated topic and its not responsible for our record prisoner counts. Less than 10% of prisoners are in private prisons. It is a terrible system that should be illegal of course. Our prison population is mostly because of the "war on drugs" created by President Nixon in order to have a new way to discriminate against blacks because the recently passed Civil Rights Act made it harder to do it in the usual ways. Eventually the gov realized it was a great w…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 06:24 AM
9

The US has more people incarcerated than ANY OTHER COUNTRY ON EARTH.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 04:39 AM
2

This one will blow your mind. https://notehub.org/hpp2i
/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:13 AM
2

Thanks. Upvoted.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 02:51 AM
1

If you are lonely then you can also join a local activity club. Bowling club? Poker night? Weekly sport meetup? The local Masonic lodge? Take your pick. You don't have to be lonely.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 02:48 AM
-3

Why work in a factory when you can make money as a model? I don't blame her for following her own self interests. Criticize all you want though. I believe in free speech.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:29 AM
2

It helps to know the backstory behind the video. There were paparazzi rumors going around at the time about T-Swizzle abusing her boyfriends. They were never proved as far as I know. So she made this video as a satire of their rumors. She called herself an abuser in her video. Sarcastically. Kanye called her a bitch in his. Its not hypocritical to be upset about that, BUT its also not misogyny to call one woman a bitch.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:26 AM
1

When I first saw the video I riffed against it also. However, once I learned the backstory it wasn't as bad as I thought. Artistic expression is where we need controversial topics to be portrayed.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:18 AM
-4

Are you ignorant of history. Rosie was an internal company promotional poster. It was never meant to even leave the factory, but then feminists resurrected it for their own purposes decades later. Even if US women wanted to fight in WWII they weren't allowed and would have been stopped. I suggest we just remember Rosie as an interesting historical anecdote and move on.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:01 AM
2

Have you heard what China is doing? EVERYTHING you said will happen is happening right now in China. http://www.networkworld.com/article/3017417/security/china-scs-social-credit-system-most-disturbing-tech-story-of-2015.html
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 07:22 AM
13

If it does come to the point of needing a lawyer then there are organizations that specialize in helping men. http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/ For full representation you are going to have to pay them for services though. They are lawyers after all. The National Center For Men, incorporated in 1987, is dedicated to the advocacy of men's equal rights. We educate the public about how men have been hurt by sex discrimination and we also counsel individuals and families who have been damaged by …
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 10:04 PM
1

You have some really deep women-hitting-phobia don't you. No matter what someone comes up with you'll default to, "a woman might still get hit somehow, someway" counter argument won't you?
/r/MensRights09/02/16 05:45 PM
-1

Its simple. I think this will satisfy the both of you. You are always justified in taking whatever action to prevent yourself from COMING UNDER BODILY ATTACK. It doesn't matter if the attack can hurt you or not because it is always morally allowed for you to defend yourself from attack. Now we simply need to have the rule that you only use as much force as is being used to attack you. If someone is slapping you around then you should be allowed to restrain their hands till they stop. There are w…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:29 PM
8

On the other hand because they preferred boys over daughters for cultural reasons they have way too many men. 33 million too many. Generations have gone to war to find women to capture/seduce and bring home before.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 07:20 AM
3

Damn it. Time to learn Chinese.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 07:06 AM
3

Have you seen this video? It goes over the differences in age and attraction definitions in a very amusing way. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpruWzaUPGY
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 06:15 AM
1

Social skills used to be learned at home. Then factories and industrialization took men out of their homes, away from their families, and locked them to production lines. Then universal schooling took the children out of their homes and locked them to production lines (homework) for hours and hours every week. Then women entered the workplace and next thing you know we have Latchkey kids. It just keeps spiraling down from there. Teach them basic law, and what to do in a legal crisis. Criminal la…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 04:47 AM
1

Actually the quote in the title is from the NPR article I found him which led me to the TED talk. It has great implications in several areas of life and society. Such as who should be responsible for the raising of children in society? And I find it very interesting in general.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:15 AM
2

You know, there was a front page article about legalized cruelty just yesterday. Let me see if I can find it again... .. here it is https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/43n4uy/nestl%C3%A9_admits_slavery_in_thailand_while_fighting/ dozens of examples of legalized cruelty. Because even though they are usually "technically" illegal they happen constantly and usually go unpunished. So yes we have a lot of work to do here, but lets not go saying that this is some kind of unique and unequaled s…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:09 AM
1

Negativo. See my reply to flyingwolf Saying we have only legalized the cruelty of women is as absurd as when feminists make statements like "women have been uniquely oppressed for all of history!" Saying we shouldn't make ridiculous statements doesn't require any mental gymnastics at all. What I can't figure out yet is how everyone else thinks that comment is reasonable.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 03:52 AM
0

No. You are just making stuff up at this point. Going back to the original comment by /u/Grasshopper21 we have only legalized the cruelty of women is a ridiculously wrong statement. I pointed out that legalized cruelty is about as old as the written word. Did he forget about thousands of years of slavery the world over? edit: my point being that there isn't anything new or unique about this situation legally or historically. And given how much legal power other groups have had over their oppress…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 03:38 AM
3

Knowing things does not make for ignorance. I have a different opinion than others here. That is what reddit exists for, sharing different opinions and ideas. Now calling someone ignorant for knowing things is willful ignorance. Glad I could educate you on that.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 03:00 AM
1

That happens to historically segregated people also... So whats your point?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 10:10 PM
-9

I know all that. I've been here a while. I still stand by my post.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 09:13 PM
3

Puhleeze. We have historically legalized cruelty of one group over another group of people in so many ways its hard to count. You ever hear of segregation for example? Women happen to have a bit of a legal advantage now but don't go making it out like some perpetual condition of society.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:39 PM
2

Here is an idea you haven't considered maybe. SHE is blue pill also. Women can be blue pill can't they? I'm rather new here so I don't know that ruling yet for sure. Here is my theory: she is just as brainwashed as any blue pill guy. She thinks LTRs are they way things are supposed to happen. She doesn't know any better just like some poor blue pill guy doesn't.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/16 03:39 AM
-4

The only eyes getting hurt are the feminists hitting themselves in the eye with this stupid shit. This is the part where we point and laugh at them while singing, "Stop hitting yourself! Stop hitting yourself! Stop hitting yourself!" This is not the part where we copy them to seem 'cool'.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 11:26 PM
1

The MRA viewpoint has pretty much taken over all of reddit as far as I can tell. The viewpoint being that men don't have it easy and we have lots of problems to fix. I've seen these talking points on dozens of popular subreddits.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 04:02 AM
1

Fee or no fee for the livestream is fine by me. Money needs to be raised somehow. Lets hope they get the price points right...
/r/MensRights30/01/16 03:49 AM
1

Have you seen my post history? I still call for compassion here. Instead of seeing this as men vs. women how about we see them as fail-able people. Another couple lives destroyed by drugs, abuse, and poverty.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:27 PM
0

Thanks, Captain Obvious. A call for compassion from time to time is a good practice for people and society. This case is terrible on many many levels.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 10:11 PM
1

Karen still does great stuff, only instead of doing stuff on her channel she does real world speeches all over the place. I've posted a couple of them, check my post history, but there are dozens all over youtube. They just aren't on her channel anymore. Karen is taking her message to the real world. That is even better than youtube.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:33 AM
1

As a reminder here is the page for the FIRST INTERNATIONAL MEN'S CONFERENCE http://www.avoiceformen.com/international-conference-on-mens-issues-detroit-june-26-28-2014/
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:28 AM
1

I've been reading up on the red pill subreddit recently. They don't seem all bad.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:10 AM
1

Who cares? Has anyone been to /r/feminism recently? Its a graveyard. Hardly anything ever makes it over 50 and they have half as many subscribers as us.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:06 AM
2

Herbivore men?
/r/MensRights19/01/16 06:48 AM
-17

Sounds like she suffered enough to me. Its not like she benefited from her actions.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 06:43 AM
1

Despite all the logical and scientific reasoning and the bleak picture you paint with it actual rates of men raising someone else's children are less than 5% almost everywhere. Last I read its around 3% in the US and less in many places. Our ethics and culture overcome the biological drive almost entirely and make it a rare occurrence. This is why using the study to justify things is a bad idea.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/16 12:01 AM
1

I often wonder whether it's even necessary to include the RP terminology when writing stuff like this. Its very necessary. TRP promotes a fairly respectful and, dare I say, moral culture for individuals to succeed in life and fuck a lot of women of course. The scientific study information can be interpreted in some very bad, non-TRP, ways. Such as it justifies betas being suspicious, controlling, manipulative, and constantly jealous because science "proves" their women will cheat on them. That c…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 10:46 PM
1

Although women are theoretically happier in "liberated" modern society, Actually I've read that life satisfaction for women was higher in the 60s and 70s than it is now. Its declined quite a bit over the last decades. Take a guess why.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 10:33 PM
15

Who wants a male worker that is going to pick up your dry cleaning and getting you lunch? You wouldn't respect him, and it would be hard for him to respect himself. Its just a fucking job, its not his personal life. Nothing wrong with picking up dry cleaning when you are being paid for it. IMO.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 09:21 PM
1

I'm going to have to disagree with you a bit. Feudalism is the end state of capitalism. Its where uncontrolled capitalism always leads to. Also people really don't understand poverty if they haven't lived it. Myself included I'm sure. Also here is a good book that relates to your last paragraph: The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Parents Are Going Broke. By Elizabeth Warren. Basically yes, feminism and 'women entering the workforce' has been used against the working people to keep them poor.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:26 PM
3

One thing that I have never seen mentioned is the idea that people have to work in order to not starve to death. That's capitalism for you. UBI would fix it. Socialism might fix it also. This is why I'll be voting Bernie soon. Did you know that most crime is petty crime. Small crimes like stealing food, stealing clothes, stealing other necessities. Also drug addicts doing petty criminal stuff because they are wan't their next fix. Source? I read it once a long time ago. UBI would end most petty …
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:11 AM
6

Have you seen this video by Sargon of Akkad, The British Crusade Against Slavery ? It makes an excellent history brief about slavery going back thousands of years. Makes it very clear that slavery wasn't just a white man's crime.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 06:36 AM
2

Something else you should probably know about facebook (and other social websites) is that they have been using AI to determine when and what to show people to keep them on as long as possible. What does that mean? Facebook is programmed to never quite give you what you want. They tease you and make you scroll page after page for as long as possible to find out what you want. You ever wonder why your friends 2 week old post comes up before today's posts? Why you have to wade through pages of stu…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 02:51 AM
9

After She Kills You A relevant video for this post. johntheother also discusses the feminist book, "Battered Woman On Trial" in this video.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:03 AM
2

Amusing story, but not a men's rights story. Just a story about people being greedy assholes.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:38 AM
1

Nice link.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:41 AM
1

Duluth model in action.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:19 AM
1

What does your girlfriend think marriage means? Have you two talked about it? She might have a completely different idea of what being married would mean. Such as having kids right away? Try this first. Pretend to be married for a couple months to see how well it works. Actually talk to her and say the words, "lets pretend to be married for a couple months". Its a big decision, you should know more first.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 12:18 AM
3

I think he has it backwards. We never lost control of the brand because we have never been big enough to have one really. Now is the time for us to make the MRA brand for the national and worldwide consciousness. What has happened is that MRA is starting to enter the mainstream consciousness over the past decade. Its a big change from the reality everyone has been spoon fed for so long and its causing lots of confusion. Additionally anti-MRA interests (you know who I mean) have been spreading co…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 11:37 PM
1

It is especially bad during Christmas. Hopefully when everyone gets back from vacation and traveling the quality here will go up again. I've seen some improvement allready over the past couple days.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:45 PM
2

This is a well known meditation technique for dealing with negative emotions and thoughts. You seem to have rediscovered it on your own. ALAMO is a clever way to explain the process. I like it. Just google "meditation name your emotion" for hundreds of articles to learn more.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 04:46 AM
7

I had not heard about how he died. Nice to have some details. Thanks.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 04:16 AM
3

It looks to me like you are exaggerating some of those numbers. Don't inflate numbers, its bad enough allready. Sources are necessary to make claims like those.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:34 AM
2

A sex offender registry results in extrajudicial punishment. The offenders are still being punished after they have paid their entire debt from imprisonment and fines. Are they free or are they still being punished? Forever? I agree that the sex offender registry system needs a major overhaul to make it more just and not a system of perpetual punishment.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 10:18 PM
2

http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/contact-us/ I wish you the best.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:19 PM
1

I believe what she was referencing is that every generation has had more men getting degrees overall as a group percentage than the previous ones. You found that the group education levels have leveled off and stopped increasing so far. If things get just a little worse (and they probably will) the next generation will have fewer degrees than their fathers. It was one of these two speeches. Sorry, I don't have time to listen to the both of them again. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujjry0CVOKI …
/r/MensRights21/12/15 04:27 PM
7

No problem, the USA is a caricature of lots of ridiculous things as well these days.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:16 AM
3

I saw some billboards on the highway nearby for a divorce lawyer that essentially said, "I specialize in helping men not get screwed by the system." It was a little uplifting. Now that I have a camera phone I might take a picture next time.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:14 AM
10

This latest generation of men are on the verge of being the first generation in hundreds of years to be less educated that the previous generation. Education has become so hostile to men and boys that hundreds of years of progress is on the verge of halting. Thats how bad it is. Karen Straughan /u/girlwriteswhat brought this up in a speech a month or two ago. I'll check my youtube history to try to find the speech or she might beat me to the reference. Lets see.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 12:18 AM
8

Sweden is basically a feminist caricature of a country at this point.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 12:12 AM
7

If it does come to the point of needing a lawyer then there are organizations that specialize in helping men. http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/ For full representation you are going to have to pay them for services though. They are lawyers after all.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:50 PM
2

There is a well known phrase, "Behind every great/terrorist man there's a great/terrorist woman" which I think is relevant here.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 09:03 PM
2

I think we have more than enough MRA websites allready https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3vbzf2/i_was_clearing_out_my_old_bookmarks_last_night/ Or the side bar... What we need is more participation and action, not more websites. Just my thoughts on the matter.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 10:47 AM
2

Also, I doubt anyone would care if a young female victim was "physically well-developed" when passing sentence over the man who abused her. It does happen and it happened recently. Monday 16 March 2015 Man, 27, acquitted of raping 13-year-old girl in Sweden because she looked 'well-developed' You might be thinking, "well it happens way more to boys than it happens to girls" and you might be right, but it does happen to girls sometimes also. Lets not go to extremes and say it never happens in the…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:09 AM
2

Men however are fertile for much, much longer, and are sought after for their ability to care for and protect the mother and child. Thus older and more experienced men with signs of power are considered more attractive. Not disagreeing with your post overall, but there are some congenital diseases that are more likely to happen as men age as well. Its biologically easier to produce some sperm than it is to carry a child to birth so men keep having children later easier. It isn't risk free though…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 10:56 AM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 10:47 AM
3

I don't know how you feel about the French, but I think you would love their stance on separation of church and state. An article I read a while ago told how many French politicians won't even step in a church while they are in office. "Do as the state does" or something close to that is the phrase they would use to explain their religious aversion as elected officials. I'm not french so I could be completely wrong on this now, but that is what I remember from the article.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 10:26 AM
2

To be fair I'm sure there were just as many people who wouldn't vote for him because he was black also. I think most people on both sides voted for non-race reasons.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 10:11 AM
2

I think the radical right and the radical left (SJWs, extreme feminists) are both symptoms of a collapsing society. Our society. The middle class is wiped out, everyone is getting poorer and more desperate except the super rich who are morphing into a ruling class. We are facing a class war between the rich and the poor and most people don't even know it yet. This is a leftist view of the situation. I realize that. And I think some leftist solutions would help the most. edit: moved a word.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:52 AM
1

The queeny, hand-wringing, language-policiing LGBT losers are the minority. I have an easy one for you. Have you ever thought of arranging those letters as GBTL? As a gay guy (you, not me) I would think putting the G first would make at least some sense.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/15 02:49 AM
11

I've also proposed a GMM Day for Great Men Monday. Other subs have specifically themed days and I think we should have one here also. A specific goal would encourage more participation here I think.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:41 AM
6

I've proposed a GWW DAY for /r/mensrights . That means Great Women Wednesday... Day. It would show that this isn't just a men's club and we aren't just women haters in this sub as well. I'm still working on making it a thing.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 01:31 AM
10

on a completely unrelated note: Honey Badger livestream in an hour. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dbf0eigxOsE
/r/MensRights18/12/15 01:04 AM
63

First they came for xxx and no one cared Then they came for xxx and no one spoke up Then they attacked everyone and everything all at once and everyone woke up and said, "what the hell is wrong with these people?" I think we are going to see a public consciousness change for the better in the next couple years.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:52 AM
2

Scheduled for Dec 17, 2015 Join the Honey badgers as we try to help men with some advice this holiday season! Tune in Thursday @9pm Eastern! DIRECT DOWNLOAD: SHOW PAGE: http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/radio/honey-badger-radio-35-handling-the-holiday-blues/ Feed the badger: http://www.patreon.com/honeybadgerradio
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:55 PM
5

Published on Nov 24, 2015 Men's Rights Sensation, Karen Straughan, compares the concept of Toxic Masculinity to the new and novel (and yet age-old, even Biblical) concept of Toxic Femininity. In this presentation, she explores the evolutionary psychology at play (both in men and women who engage in heavily gendered forms of socially toxic behaviours), and the cultural norms that either encourage or place constraints on these tendencies. Hosted by SFU Advocacy For Men & Boys: http://www.sfuamb.co…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 09:37 PM
1

I saw that. Still no reason to put an R in there.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:14 PM
1

Where do you get the "R" from Gay, Bi, Trans, and Lesbian? There used to be a debate a long time about which way to arrange the letters. Then, as with most things, the women won out and the L went to the front. I think its time to change things around. /u/typhonblue what do ya think? Worthy of mention on a podcast?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 10:35 PM
0

How about GBTL?
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:32 PM
12

Kinda like this? Sweden, where 60% of university students are women, abolished their affirmative action program because it helped men over women. Then when that wasn't enough they did this. More women in tech? Student debt write-off for women only. I guess abolishing affirmative action for helping men wasn't enough...
/r/MensRights14/12/15 08:23 PM
26

It's been discussed some times before. The general agreement is that the acceptable range of behaviors and lifestyles for women is far larger than it is for men. That's changed a little on the past decades with GBTL acceptance going up, but it's still a big difference.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 06:19 PM
1

You are looking at a Google hangout podcast. They talk about the report in the first half hour of the show. Or you can Google it.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 10:16 PM
9

Anita And Zoe's report to the United Nations had references to c: drive files. https://youtu.be/SqTZEjkX4Jk
/r/MensRights10/12/15 01:11 AM
21

There weren't any "c:" references at least. ... Do people deserve to be praised for that?
/r/MensRights09/12/15 05:38 PM
2

It happens. Here is one example. Its several levels of WTF. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Boursicot I've heard of a couple others over the years.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 05:10 PM
1

The part when he was 23 was a stupid parole violation and had nothing to do with sex or minors. The person in charge of his parole is an arse who seems more interested in punishing him than his reform since he was trying to get a job when he was thrown in jail again. As if it isn't hard enough for parolees to get jobs. when he was just 18 years old and a senior at West Port High School, Joseph M. Garcia, was arrested and charged with Sexual Battery. Sure, the letter of the law was broken. Ruinin…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:30 AM
1

They have absolutely nothing to do with strict liability The man charged here in this post was 18. Why did you change it to 23? /u/dfsgdhgresdfgdff said "It literally is an excuse in many jurisdictions". That is right, Romeo and Juliet laws do create an excuse in many jurisdictions. You might be arguing for law here, I am arguing for justice. An 18 year old who had sex with someone pretty much in the same age group should engender some slight leeway. The law should be more than a set of strict r…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:17 AM
3

you can't get out of it by claiming you thought she was older Its possible. Romeo and Juliet laws
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:47 AM
1

It literally is. Romeo and Juliet laws
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:46 AM
0

The law in many places doesn't blame him anymore. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape#Romeo_and_Juliet_laws These laws really took off after the case of Genarlow Wilson was convicted of aggravated child molestation when he, 17, RECIEVED oral sex from a girl, 15, at a new year's eve party in 2003 and was sentenced to a mandatory 10 years in prison without parole and a lifetime registration as a sex offender. Crazy part is if he had PIV sex with her and even got her pregnant he would have…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 06:02 AM
48

Upvoted for being informative and making a fair point. counterpoint: Romeo and Juliet laws and http://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/criminal-law/violent_crimes/romeo-and-juliet-law.htm Often, teenage couples engage in sexual conduct as part of an intimate relationship. This may occur before either participant has reached the age of consent, or after one has but the other has not. In the latter case, in most jurisdictions, the person who has reached the age of consent is guilty of statutory rape. I…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:48 AM
1

Good point. It is prison and there should be restrictions.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:29 AM
2

Yes, I did editorialize the title a little. I did it accurately though. including more than 120,000 mothers and 1.1 million fathers That makes 1,220,000 prisoner parents in total. 9.8% Mothers 90.2% Fathers The article focuses almost exclusively on Fathers in prison which, given these numbers, seems fair. The article is good overall, please read if you have time. . Going to prison is often an isolating event. It is assumed that once a person is incarcerated, their former life will simply vanish.…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:22 PM
1

Bernie is a smart man. If he knows anything about our issues here he also knows he can't mention them at all or he would lose the election overnight. If he doesn't know about men's issues in society then hopefully he learns about them and helps after he gets elected. He is the best candidate regardless. Everyone else will be much worse. My 2 cents.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 04:11 AM
4

I'm voting Bernie Sanders. That sounds like a good start.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 07:55 PM
9

No. Instead their affirmative action was canceled because they are men. Not kidding. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3h834l/sweden_where_60_of_university_students_are_women/
/r/MensRights03/12/15 07:52 PM
4

Information time: This booklet is a written transcription of her TED talk here. Half hour long, Published on Apr 12, 2013, 2.3 million views. Please watch the TED talk so we are informed about the topic. She says that Nigeria and Laos (and other places in Africa) are still have some gender segregation in public and are a bit more sexist than European countries. Otherwise 20 minutes in and it seems to be the usual talking points and feminist anecdotes so far. Not too bad on the 'crazy and I drank…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:17 PM
13

I think TB said it quite awhile back: the only consistent measuring privilege in the Western world is money. From a British perspective the bonkers identity politics of America has struck me and everyone I know as fucking nonsense, especially when they try to apply it as a universal rule. Socioeconomic status has, in every study I've read, been the single most accurate predictor of academic success. This spans across almost all developed countries, whether you're looking at Sweden, the United St…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 05:36 PM
1

Damn, I'm on a roll! Two additions to the sidebar brought by me. How about a third? I posted about this group a couple months ago. http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/ The National Center For Men, the longest running and still active Men's Rights Group. Almost 30 years strong.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 09:21 PM
1

What do you think of adding this organization to the sidebar? Mods? /u/AloysiusC /u/typhonblue /u/sillymod
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:45 PM
2

South Park has been great this season. Not that that is unusual for South Park. Here is what I think happened generally speaking. Speculation on my part. I think the decreasing popularity of people identifying themselves as Feminists, now as low as 18% in some polls, has resulted in them spilling over into loads of other social issue activism. All the strategies and tools feminism built up over decades didn't just disappear or fade away. This is why all these various SJW groups that have popped …
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:18 PM
2

Here is what I think happened. Speculation on my part. I think the decreasing popularity of people identifying themselves as Feminists, now as low as 18% in some polls, has resulted in them spilling over into loads of other social issue activism. All the strategies and tools feminism built up over decades didn't just disappear or fade away. This is why all these various SJW groups that have popped up in the last few years largely use the same strategies, tactics, and keywords. But, BUT this is a…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:12 PM
1

Good to know. I didn't research him before posting.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 07:01 PM
3

These folks seem to be the real deal. They have been around for over a decade and they have articles like this: Why we need young men to fight for their rights When are we going to do something about sexism against young men? Yes you read it right, not sexism by young men but sexism AGAINST young men. And what about tackling the discrimination and inequality that young men face or fighting for equal rights for young men? There’s a good chance at this stage that you’ve got no idea what I’m talkin…
/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:45 PM
1

Yeah, people suck a lot of the time. I get that. Damn.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 04:46 PM
0

Damn right.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 06:56 AM
1

I'm going to use all of them on my GWW posts. That stands for Great Women Wednesdays.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:54 PM
7

I think someone should gold it as well.... Well, what do ya know.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:51 PM
1

amazing comment from /u/MalaclypseTheYunger over on r/JoeRogan https://np.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/3tdt6f/jre_724_christina_sommers/ ........................ I fully get why feminists disagree with her. What I don't understand is the lack of engagement with her. That genuinely confuses me. I'm at about 2 hours in and she's just said one of the most important things which is that, despite all her disagreement, you have to remain open minded because sometimes people will come forwards with "…
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:38 PM
2

Until these "realizations" lead to direct political action that is successful Isn't that why we are here?
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:18 PM
1

Not from me. I just clicked on their profile and saw they did another kickstarter before.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 08:16 PM
27

"Useful Idiots", ladies and gents.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:33 PM
1

It does for reddit I think. Hope it spreads elsewhere.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:31 PM
2

Its going to take a couple days to watch them all.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 09:27 AM
2

Nice. Gave another $150 of food this week myself.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:51 AM
1

Who?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:11 PM
1

Agreed. Circumcision is around #10 on my list of the biggest problems to deal with.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:58 PM
1

I was trying to ask if you would contribute also. I'll keep trying regardless. I am worried that this sub isn't active enough and is devolving into an isolated group. I am trying to get this group out of its shell and interact with the world. We don't see posts about the biggest and most well known MRA's nearly often enough. How often do you see a Sargon, or Thunderf00t, or Honey Badger posts here?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:37 PM
1

Group effort?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:25 PM
1

Amusing side note. 8 is a mystical number in the Terry Pratchett Disk World novels. I can't help thinking of this jacket as a wizzard's jacket.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 08:14 PM
2

MoProMo - Movember 2015
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:48 PM
3

It seems there is also allready a group just for this. https://www.reddit.com/r/movember/ Have at it.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:46 PM
1

I have tested the waters on that, but not on a Wednesday yet. The response was tepid. I will keep trying.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:29 PM
1

I'm trying. Not too many biting this morning. \ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3uviux/movember_madness_monday_i_gave_over_300_of_food/
/r/MensRights30/11/15 07:25 PM
1

Interesting ideas. I will think them over.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:56 AM
1

I try to make a few posts every morning. Best time for posts. Its about making the perfect headline to get people's attention. Suggestions?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 05:41 AM
7

She just did Joe Rogan podcast recently. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_hS-JXoTMk Joe Rogan Experience #724 - Christina Sommers 2:53:09
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:18 AM
28

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_hS-JXoTMk Joe Rogan Experience #724 - Christina Sommers 2:53:09 If you don't make a post of it I will tomorrow morning. ;) edit: made a post https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3uvajc/joe_rogan_experience_724_christina_hoff_sommers/
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:17 AM
24

What do you think of a day in this sub to recognize great women who have helped with men's rights? I was thinking something along the lines Great Women Wednesday, or GWWday. It would be a great way to introduce people and newcomers to the figureheads of the movement and lead them to some excellent reading and other materials to lean from. It would also show very clearly that we aren't anti-women or such. We could also make a day for the men leading the movement, GMM for Great Men Monday? I've be…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:05 AM
1

http://endingviolence.org/contact-us/ Here is their contact page. We have plenty on the side bar and /r/MRRef to communicate to them.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:53 PM
1

Thanks! This is awesome. I've often thought we should have days of the week for certain things or scheduled book review days of the month. We should do a series on books starting with the suggested reading list on the side bar. The feminists did a 15 part teardown of The Myth of Male Power a while ago. We need to do better. More in depth research and discussion can only do us good here.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:44 PM
1

We need to put the 'A' in MRA to use. Lets get their attention.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:37 PM
47

Also fur tends to be of more exotic and rarer animals. Bikers are probably just wearing cow leather.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 08:35 PM
2

nice layout.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 07:44 PM
16

There are groups who specialize in this sort of thing. These guys are one example. http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/ For full representation you are going to have to pay them for services though. They are lawyers after all.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:43 AM
14

This video should be used as a guide on how to break up with someone while protecting yourself legally from accusations.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:30 AM
1

That is how I spell that word. I spell it that way on purpose. Go away.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:09 AM
1

This should be added to /r/MRRef I will post it there unless you want the honor.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:59 AM
2

I would like to see more of what he accomplished with the first kickstarter and $15,000 2 years ago before I donate money. Any supporters of his first kickstarter here? Updates?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:44 AM
1

Ask in /r/KOTAKUINACTION and /r/TUMBLRINACTION They are more active and willing to get into shit fights there. As for pure information do a search for "infographic" for examples.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:37 AM
5

When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. For feminists, their hammer is the accusation of rape apology.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:34 AM
3

Remember when they took up the first two rows of a speech and covered their mouths with duct tape. What the fuck were they supposed to be symbolizing with that?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:23 AM
5

Mike Buchanan is your guy. Look up everything on him and he can connect you to people who can help there. Send his office an email asking for a good divorce lawyer. He probably has binders of them. There are some UK links on the sidebar as well. Check them out carefully to find what you need.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:21 AM
1

There should be a basic guide for breaking up safely and covering your ass. Step one: video record the condition of everything. House, yourself, car, personal possessions, furniture, etc..
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:13 AM
1

I plan on doing a GMM (Great Men Monday) post on Mike Buchanan soon now. You mind if I repost this video?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 01:09 AM
1

Thanks for explaining. We will have to agree to disagree on the word though. Funny thing it that I have had a reddit discussion on "platforms" less than a day ago about this very topic. Funny coincidence.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:38 AM
2

"cancel" sounded like censorship to me. How did you mean it?
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:03 AM
1

Crop it.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 04:00 AM
2

Damn right! Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:26 PM
1

Yeah, I had hoped for a bigger response, There are still a couple weeks to go though. Still time to get it happening.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:26 PM
2

Yes I did. Selfie day. Why not get the members here working together on something?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:25 PM
1

Team Badger Karen Straughan In the 1960s Karen worked as a international weapons dealer and double agent. For whom is classified but she can tell you that she once smuggled plutonium in her bra. Afterwards she popped back into the time stream for a brief stint as Ada Lovelace in the 1800s. In addition to being a time traveling covert agent she has a bionic liver and pinky toe and wears a cat suit professionally. (Can you tell she didn't write this bio?) When she's not out saving the timey wimey …
/r/MensRights26/11/15 11:21 PM
4

Or maybe we shouldn't start censoring things. That sounds a little like sjw tactics. Some criticism and counter examples of our own would be a better idea I think.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:27 PM
2

What do you all think of a Movember Event around here? How about Man Fur Friday, MFF, When we share pictures of our Movember achievements. Share your beards, your mustaches, or whatever you let grow out for Movember. Ladies you are welcome to share your mustaches, and beards, or whatever also. Its Thanksgiving, a good time to for pictures. Show your family, friends, and fellow redditors what you chose to do. Any additional ideas? Thoughts?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:23 PM
10

This man is challenging the masters. By showing he's not afraid, he makes them afraid and sooner or later we will see their response. The cluster of men who benefit from an anti-male society won't give it up willingly. I think he's smarter than most and knows how to avoid honeytraps. I hope he has already a contingency plan.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:22 PM
58

Women have made an issue of the fact that men talk over women in meetings. In my experience, that’s true. But for full context, I interrupt anyone who talks too long without adding enough value. If most of my victims turn out to be women,I am still assumed to be the problem in this situation, not the talkers That's some stone cold truth right there.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 08:20 PM
1

Get a copy or find out where it is?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:38 PM
1

Its been shows a couple times that boys perform better academically just after they have had physical activity. If they scheduled gym classes FIRST thing in the mornings for boys they would do much better. There are lots of simple things we could do to help boys in schools.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:21 PM
1

Agree completely. That is why we need economic and social reform to make it possible for parents and children to spend more time together. Its a really crappy situation when both parents have to work to pay the bills. They can't be parents because they work soo much. Universal Basic Income or something.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 07:19 PM
3

As long as we are talking about good women on our side HONEY BADGER BRIGADE. A couple guys there too, whatevers. ;) I have been making attempts for the last couple weeks to get things happening around here. I have also been trying recently to speak up about the good women around this sub. I'm trying to prevent too much negativity and vitriol. Its tough work. Many people are stuck in complaint mode. I'm ready for some action around here. Count me in.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:52 PM
1

When you click on "reply" to a comment and the text box pops up look to the bottom right of the box where it says "formatting help". It really does help to click and read that.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 06:41 PM
1

Streamed live on Nov 25, 2015 Join the Honeybadgers as we talk about the director that gave us black and white stripes, spirals, and Johnny Depp, Tim Burton! DIRECT DOWNLOAD: http://traffic.libsyn.com/honeybadgerradio/2015-11-25_Badgerpod_Nerdcast_58_-_Tim_Burton.mp3
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:57 AM
3

Physical assault and battery laws and rape laws have always covered married women as well as unmarried women. Laws against wife beating have existed for centuries. Protecting women from abuse has been a hot topic for as long as you can look back. In 1906 President Theodore Roosevelt proposed bringing back corporal punishment solely for men who beat their wives for example. I am sure you can dredge up examples of wives getting beaten or getting raped back for centuries as that can still be found …
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:53 AM
1

whereas males are structurally in power Other guy allready addressed this, but I want to mention the 'apex fallacy'. Its the false belief that those in power/on top are representative of everyone else below them in society. Just because there are men on top doesn't mean all the other men below benefit from that. As for how to respond I strongly recommend this short video by Sargon of Akkad: The British Crusade Against Slavery. He goes into detail on the history of slavery and white slavery. I'm …
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:47 AM
5

Join Karen and Alison as they cover CBC's recent discussion of the Men's Rights movement. In which CBC held without asking any actual Men's Rights Activists to speak. DIRECT DOWNLOAD: http://traffic.libsyn.com/honeybadgerradio/Rantzerker_14_-_Canadian_Bullshit_Corporation.mp3 The National on Men's Rights: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s4sZi8zjzY&feature=youtu.be Feed the mother fucking badger: http://www.patreon.com/honeybadgerradio
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:44 PM
1

Just keep telling yourself whatever helps you sleep through the night.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:48 AM
1

She is an incredibly successful, rich, and accomplished person. I was awestruck by her achievements. Call being choked up with pride whatever you want.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:38 AM
1

Oh. Terribly sorry again. I never meant imply or state that you were the subject of my observations. I meant to be speaking generally. I officially apologize for that and accept any blame for the misunderstanding. I do appreciate hearing other view points.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:27 AM
1

Many really successful women never call themselves feminists. They are too busy getting things done. I realize the woman I linked, Stephanie Shirley, never mentioned feminism at all during her speech. It seems she, like your mother, was too busy for that shit. It was I who brought up feminism in this post because feminism, despite our personal hatred for it, is a very trendy and well known word. If we can co-opt it in some way and make it into something good then all the better. Congrats on havi…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:19 AM
1

What the fuck is wrong with you? I didn't make this post to argue or get agitated about anything. So I moved past any of that and tried to maintain calm and (hopefully) productive discourse. I usually don't get offended easily. If I force myself I can also see how her comments can be upsetting. Thanks for sharing your opinions on the matter. I appreciate hearing other view points.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:56 AM
2

On the other hand words change, meanings change. Over time they end up meaning the complete opposite of where they came from. If we changed the meaning it would be a success.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:47 PM
1

Its a shame that name calling and labeling people with differing opinions happens so quickly around here. I try to say something in a different way and within a few comments I get called troll or puppet account or feminist under cover. Fuck, he 'proved' I was a troll without even looking at my comment history. At least I can talk to a few who are willing to discuss past the name calling.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:45 PM
0

If I understand you correctly, you are saying she also had plenty of good things to say. Right?
/r/MensRights22/11/15 11:23 AM
-2

Ha! If only you had checked my user history /u/Lurker_IV it would have been so obvious sooner. Go ahead, look, its a hoot.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:55 AM
-1

Oh No! She voiced a few negative sentiments. What do you suggest? That we just ignore everything else she said and did?
/r/MensRights22/11/15 10:44 AM
-2

You seem agitated.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 08:14 AM
-1

Well sure, if you want to get extremely technical and pedantic then that word might not be super, precisely correct. On the other hand words change, meanings change. I would love if being a feminist meant what Stephanie Shirley did with her life. I would love it if we here on /r/mensrights had our own definition of feminism to compete with the standard definition. Instead of only criticizing feminism here I want us to be able to say, "Hey women look at this. There is a better kind of feminsm!"
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:27 AM
5

I think it shows women can be a kind of feminist without being man haters. That is something we should want here.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 02:19 AM
4

That is pretty much what I was thinking. We are capable of admiring women in this sub. Shows we have a friendly side too.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 02:17 AM
-2

That is the "test post" part. To see how people would respond to a post about a woman in this sub. This has to do with men's rights because it shows that women can be strong and successful without the man hating that modern feminism has become. "This is what feminist should be".
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:55 AM
3

I have huge respect for many women who do achieve great things, many without even shouting about it. I ran into this woman on TED talks recently. She fits that description multiplied a couple times. What do you think of her? TED: Dame Stephanie Shirley is the most successful tech entrepreneur you never heard of. Serious question.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:39 AM
2

Women's incarceration is a terrible travesty as long as you don't compare it to anything else at all. Or in other words as long as you lack any kind of perspective women's suffering is the worst.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:04 AM
1

Thank you. I saved this comment. You wouldn't believe how many times I get accused of "progressive stacking" whenever I try to mention ending the war on drugs and prison/justice system reform to help men.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 12:55 AM
2

Wow! Actual activism around here. That I didn't expect. I've spent the last couple weeks looking for MRAs and I finally found one. Count me in with ElectricFleshlight
/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:53 PM
8

Here is the list reposted. Bias in the criminal court system Bias in the civil court system Ge3nder discrimination in law (Rape definitions, draft legislation) University entrance rates and education in schools. (Men fall behind) Paternity leave Legal parental surrender or reliable contraception Male rape and domestic abuse "Real Man"Ism Depictions of males in media Circumcision and respect for bodily autonomy
/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:28 PM
6

I would pick imprisoned men as the biggest issue. They US has the highest numbers of prisoners than any other country in the world. Mostly men as usual.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:26 PM
18

Sounds like they need a few polite and informative comments.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:24 PM
1

Obviously.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:27 AM
13

"They don't want students who agree with me to be safe. They just want their ideas to be safe and protected from any contrary point of view." This is what SJW's are all about. Dershowitz on Megyn Kelly last week talking about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpzD5E9GZXY If you had told me a year ago that places like Breitbart and Fox News will be the defenders of free speech against authoritarians, I would've called you crazy...
/r/MensRights18/11/15 08:33 PM
1

I have enough worry for multiple goals at the same time. I call it multitasking.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:22 PM
1

Your google skills are pretty weak. Did you try other combinations of words? "register her" brings up 8 relevant results. "register her elam" brings up twenty.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:38 AM
0

Our demographic - the people most affected by the issues at the heart of this movement - are doing the least. That is my point. People around here call themselves MRAs, but I hardly see activism around here or anywhere. It would be nice to see people living up to the A in MRA.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:54 PM
1

That still gives us plenty to work with. Plenty to get things done.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:36 PM
1

I give a shit what we do.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:33 PM
2

equality They keep using that word but I'm not entirely sure they know what it actually means. That's something that really frustrates me, men trying to help other men try to start their own thing and it's all 'NECKBEARD MANBABY MRAS HATE WOMEN HUEHUEHUE' and are told to stick with feminist groups because apparently they want the same thing. Then you look at the typical student union feminist led groups on the other hand like this only want to focus on women's issues, constantly side-lining men'…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:49 AM
1

I have been noticing that other subs with less than half our subscribers have so much more activity, and upvotes, and discussion on posts. I've been wondering what's wrong here that is making us so dead and listless. Any thoughts? Places like /r/SandersForPresident has a few more subscribers but they can accomplish in one day what we haven't accomplished in the last 2 years. We need to do something about that.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:43 AM
5

Thats what I just said. a recognition of the inhumanity of the overall situation and the need to fix it might help. Here is how I would have written the original comment She might find that in prison, she might actually get raped. That is exactly what would have happen to the guy if her accusation worked. But that isn't justice, no one should be raped in prison. We should put equal sentencing for men and women close to ending prison rape on our list.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:27 AM
2

And everyone else is saying that rape should never be part of the punishment equation. We know people get raped in prison. It shouldn't be that way and no one likes the to hear anyone being sent somewhere that they are likely to be raped. If we are going to talk about it then perhaps a recognition of the inhumanity of the overall situation and the need to fix it might help.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:16 AM
2

Yes. The "A" in MRA stands for 'Activist' after all. Someone has to make sure and earn that A sometime.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:26 AM
1

I agree completely If this was /r/SandersForPresident you would have 100 volunteers by now. Sadly this isn't. Hey, at least no one replied with a N.Y.P.A. yet. So you have that going for you.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:23 AM
5

Not much going on in this sub anyways, might as well try to pepper it with some of the classics. Anyone else wish this sub had the energy and vitality that lots of other subs have? Subreddits like KOTAKUINACTION and pussypassdenied both have less than half the subscribers but they both get more posts, way more upvotes and way way more discussion and comments. How can we get that kind of energy back here?...
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:18 AM
-4

We got it the first time. Still not funny.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 05:58 AM
7

Activism. Good move.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:07 PM
3

Perhaps the students of that university can be organized into throwing Men's Day events on their own without the University's help. They can make sure the media knows about, send out press releases, etc. Anyone here from the University? You know.... activism.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:06 PM
1

Interesting. We should still contact people about this.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 07:58 AM
3

They must be looking at the entire graduating totals over a lifetime or something. Because there is a clear trend towards women earning more degrees in recent years. Stunning college degree gap: Women have earned almost 10 million more college degrees than men since 1982
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:24 PM
3

I suggest trying to not be too confrontational about your list. Try to make it into a good natured, academic, intellectual exercise at first. "Professor, I have accepted your challenge from yesterday and compiled an opposing list to your challenge from yesterday. Would you please let me present my counter examples to the class?" Be clear and descriptive of the examples he is giving today. Try to make your description of the situation an argument in itself. Go hardcore if he turns you down then.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:07 PM
1

This is the best things I have seen written about the protests so far. You know how MRAs, GamerGaters, atheists, Christian conservatives have been raving for years about a problem of bigotry growing within the left, especially on college campuses... remember how all these groups were demonized and laughed at as losers, manbabies, whitesplainers, fedora tippers, racists, rape apologists, etc??? Well, guess what... they weren't all evil hatemongers. In fact, they aren't all straight cis white male…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:38 PM
2

I do love going back and watching an old speech now and then. It is invigorating sometimes.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:35 AM
1

I make sure to spread out to other more upbeat places like Sargon, Katakuinaction, Honey Badger broadcasts, etc.. Keeps the spirit alive.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:25 AM
1

Lets hope we don't end up going full retard and claiming we were the ones who saved this movie. We failed and we failed because of the attitudes we have been seeing around here.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:18 AM
2

I have linked to one or two of those organizations before. Sadly, this sub seems to be degrading towards victimization rather than action so my posts don't get the most visible attention. Take a look, what do you think? these guys have been around for a looooong time. You could also send an email to [email protected] Those guys seem to be sufficiently organized for actually doing things.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:39 PM
2

I have linked to one or two of those organizations before. Sadly, this sub seems to be degrading towards victimization rather than action so my posts don't get the most visible attention. Take a look, what do you think? these guys have been around for a looooong time. You could also send an email to [email protected] Those guys seem to be sufficiently organized for actually doing things.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:39 PM
4

Bernie is a very intelligent man as he has demonstrated constantly for decades. I am sure if someone put the facts before him he would understand. But him acting on any of it would cost him the election absolutely. He can't waver from his pro-women message until after the election because a feminist backlash for anything, especially men related, would create backlash and move half his supporters over to Clinton. If he even knows about the factual issues at all he can't act on them. Not for a lon…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 09:37 PM
2

So we shouldn't have any standards? There should be some common standard of behavior.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:30 AM
1

Quite. Has anyone else noticed that every thread has the cookie cutter posts about various men's issues and stats. You are posting in /r/MensRights for damned sake, everyone allready knows. Another post about rape, better mention that more men are raped in the US than women every single time. Just preaching to the quire there. People don't get banned in this sub like some other subs, but there are many ways to damage or destroy a sub.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:56 AM
2

Nice discussion about it over here.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:36 AM
1

Unfortunately that is becoming the default reaction in this sub more every day. I subscribed to a couple other subs to thin out the negativity from this sub.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:14 AM
-1

Nice. I do like conversing with other open minded people sometimes.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:15 AM
1

I was coming at it from the perspective that anyone with brains would see that coming a mile away and prepare for that trick.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:13 AM
-2

You only read more than half of his message. Really showed him.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:55 AM
1

How about a link folks? In Just the Last Four Years, States Have Enacted 231 Abortion Restrictions I think you would get this better than most of the others here, chocoboat. Bernie is a very intelligent man as he has demonstrated constantly for decades. I am sure if someone put the facts before him he would understand. But him acting on any of it would cost him the election absolutely. He can't waver from his pro-women message until after the election because a feminist backlash for anything, es…
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:54 AM
5

If he really offered money, I can guarantee that he would make the requirement that all feminist abide by that definition they give him. The feminists would have a set definition of patriarchy they would have to stick to. If the patriarchy is now that guy then how are they going to blame the wage gap on that one guy? How are they going to blame rape culture on that one guy? He can't personally cause every rape in the country, they could prove that by following him around 24/7.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:10 AM
2

But the feminists would have a set definition of patriarchy they would have to stick to. If the patriarchy is now that guy then how are they going to blame the wage gap on that one guy? How are they going to blame rape culture on that one guy? He can't personally cause every rape in the country, they could prove that by following him around 24/7.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 07:09 AM
2

Excellent question! I should have thought of that, damn it. Possibly we can influence search engines, and thus public view, by promulgating the upcoming film and the reference to THE MATRIX all over the internet for the next couple months. So when people google 'the red pill' they will not see r/theredpill at all possibly. tldr: lets advertise the film heavily.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:31 PM
8

Most people know of "The Red Pill" as a Matrix movie reference and not as r/TheRedPill. Most people will probably keep thinking this way after the movie is out.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:50 AM
3

There are more than 2 political parties. I'm sure with a little research you could answer your own questions.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 10:44 PM
3

is pretty much the introductory paragraph to the Democratic Political Party play book. FTFY.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 10:29 PM
1

Here is an idea. Imagine if boys played against girls with one hand actually tied behind their back. Even if they only did it sometimes as a demonstration to show how unequal the playing fields are.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:48 PM
1

It is not bollocks. There is peer reviewed research proving that the older a father is the significantly more likely his children will have a number of genetic diseases and deformities. Just like women are significantly more likely to have pregnancy problems the older they get. Biological clock Yo! linkies The Advanced Age of the Father May Be a Risk Factor in Anomalies of the Foetus Elderly People With Elderly Fathers- Do they face more problems? Aging dads more likely to have kids with autism,…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:22 PM
1

What happened is that she went into the film as a feminist and she had support and funding from all sorts of feminist friends and colleagues. Then she started hearing the MRA side and started changing her beliefs. When her feminist friends and colleagues realized she wasn't going to make the documentary into a hit piece on MRAs they withdrew funding. That is as close as it actually gets to trying to shut it down so far by withdrawing funding. I agree that it is bad journalism to call that an att…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 02:16 AM
8

I have been following the story somewhat. Its bounced through reddit a couple times allready also. What happened is that she went into the film as a feminist and she had support and funding from all sorts of feminist friends and colleagues. Then she started hearing the MRA side and started changing her beliefs. When her feminist friends and colleagues realized she wasn't going to make the documentary into a hit piece on MRAs they withdrew funding. That is as close as it actually gets to trying t…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 02:09 AM
0

eh?
/r/MensRights02/11/15 01:46 AM
1

So its a very clever and subtle ruse to deviously trick us into subtly turning against and demonize men?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:45 PM
1

Thanks for your thoughts. I didn't see that in the pictures. There weren't any graphical or textual signs that I noticed that indicated violent outcomes were immediately at hand. The general style of the artwork seemed friendly and lighthearted to me. These posters could also be read as a good way to teach people to take control of a situation at the first signs of excessive pressuring for sex. Set your boundaries early, etc.. A creative minded person might possibly think the phrase "I don't owe…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:41 PM
1

It seems easy enough to switch the genders in those pictures to me. They were drawn so that the genders could be switched easily. A man could be telling a woman "I don't owe you" just as easily.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:34 PM
1

I think each poster showed both parties having agency and mutual participation in the scenarios. Looking at the posters I see first poster: she continued to "messaged all night" after the sexting. That demonstrates some agency and mutual participation on her part. Suppose some viewers could jump to seeing bias against the guy though. I missed that. second: the color shading shows that she was flirting with him. Sounds at least somewhat mutual to me again. Is is because he is looking at her that …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:30 PM
1

The posters seem neutral to me, it could be the woman pressuring the guy just as easily. Takes a lot of hypocrisy out of the equation if you see it that way.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:12 PM
0

I don't see the posters solely targeting men. Each posters shows mutual participation and engagement to me. Either party can be the pressurer. I explained in other posts how I see that. How is it that you interpret the pictures as only implicating men as the perps?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:08 PM
1

Looking at the posters myself I see that in the first poster: she continued to "messaged all night" after the sexting. That demonstrates some agency and mutual participation on her part. Suppose some viewers could jump to seeing bias against the guy though. I missed that. second: the color shading shows that she was flirting with him. Sounds at least somewhat mutual to me again. Is is because he is looking at her that you see the man as the 'problem'? Do you automatically perceive male gaze as r…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 03:02 PM
1

To me, all of these complaints look like the feminist tactic of playing the victim, finding something "problematic" with everything they see. I didn't want to say it myself, but that is what I am seeing also.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:58 PM
0

These posters could also be read as a good way to teach people to take control of a situation at the first signs of excessive pressuring for sex. Set your boundaries early, etc.. "I don't owe you" could be a good catchphrase for people to stop a sexual situation at any point. Teaching people a proactive approach or another way of saying no means no... or something. You don't have to jump to the worst possible scenario every time with rape and violent assault. I suppose people are different. I tr…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:55 PM
-1

Damn! Sorry to hear that. I was hoping someone out there had better posters to show. But you just said no on has any better posters out there. I guess that means the "I Don't Owe You" posters are the best for now.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:35 PM
1

These posters perpetuate the idea that rape and sexual assault are just waiting around every corner. I didn't see that in the pictures. There weren't any graphical or textual signs that I noticed that indicated violent outcomes were immediately at hand. The general style of the artwork seemed friendly and lighthearted to me. These posters could also be read as a good way to teach people to take control of a situation at the first signs of excessive pressuring for sex. Set your boundaries early, …
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:57 AM
-1

False dichotomy. pfft. It was simple question. I wasn't forcing an ultimatum from anyone. and I did say If anyone has better posters I would like to see them.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 04:17 AM
-1

Looking at the posters myself I see that in the first poster: she continued to "messaged all night" after the sexting. That demonstrates some agency and mutual participation on her part. Suppose some viewers could jump to seeing bias against the guy though. I missed that. second: the color shading shows that she was flirting with him. Sounds at least somewhat mutual to me again. Is is because he is looking at her that you see the man as the 'problem'? Do you automatically perceive male gaze as r…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:24 AM
-1

I think each poster showed both parties having agency and mutual participation in the scenarios. I think being upset about women trying to trick money out of men is a different issue to be discussed at a different time.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:22 AM
0

It was a question as indicated by the question mark. I support men's rights and these posters do worlds better than "Don't Be That Guy" posters. They do a good job of that.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:16 AM
-2

Looking at the posters myself I see that in the first poster: she continued to "messaged all night" after the sexting. That demonstrates some agency and mutual participation on her part. Suppose some viewers could jump to seeing bias against the guy though. I missed that. second: the color shading shows that she was flirting with him. Sounds at least somewhat mutual to me again. Is is because he is looking at her that you see the man as the 'problem'? Do you automatically perceive male gaze as r…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 02:13 AM
-1

u/rg57 made a reasonable list of objections. I am working on that. As for the other part are you suggesting that we here never take or use anything ever created by feminists? Ever?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:57 AM
3

Its an obviously feminist website. Of course people here would find things to object about there. My hope was people would recognize an improvement when they see one and be able to look past website differences and work towards a common goal. I hoped people would see where these are coming from and say, "He's right, even though feminists made this those posters they are, in fact, better." I suppose I should be happy that no one posted, "LOLZ! you posted feminist stuff, U must be concern troll."
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:34 AM
-1

Thank you for posting. You are the first person to point out something specific about the posters that they think has bias. So if I understand correctly any posters that involve buying drinks targets the man as the likely perpetrator because of the stereotype that only men buy drinks for women at bars. Correct?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:28 AM
-2

Could you please elaborate on... well, all of the posters? I don't see the things you are telling us about.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:23 AM
-1

How is that? I don't see it.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:21 AM
-1

Its a blatantly feminist website. Of course people here would find things to object about there. My hope was people would recognize an improvement when they see one and be able to look past website differences and work towards a common goal. I hoped people would see where these are coming from and say, "He's right, even though feminists made this those posters they are, in fact, better." I suppose I should be happy that no one posted, "LOLZ! you posted feminist stuff, U must be concern troll." W…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 01:19 AM
0

You might try wearing one of their shirts for some of your night to get more out of them. They would be more willing to talk to you if you wore one of their shirts. You would at least get some definitions out of them.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:14 AM
-2

Yes, I read the website. I saw that. Even the website is an improvement over so much we see out there. Just because it isn't perfect doesn't mean it isn't better. To answer my own question: YES, I think these posters would be better than having "Don't Be That Guy" posters everywhere. They are gender neutral unlike "Don't Be That Guy" posters .
/r/MensRights31/10/15 11:25 PM
-2

They are a significant improvement over the "Don't Be That Guy" posters. Given the choice which would you pick? When I see something that could make things better I go for it. If anyone has better posters I would like to see them.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:46 PM
4

This is what activism looks like. Going on stage and speaking to people.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:09 PM
0

Does anyone have any thoughts on whether these are actually better posters than they "Don't Be That Guy" posters? Would you rather the "Don't Be That Guy" posters just kept on being used? Maybe I am being foolish in hoping things can be made better.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:00 PM
-2

Its tiring seeing everyone only look for things to complain about. Simple question. Would it or would it not be a good idea to replace all the "Don't Be That Guy" posters with these?
/r/MensRights31/10/15 08:28 PM
-9

Well shit son, yer right. Back to the "Don't Be That Guy" posters then. Why even try? I'm sorry to say this, but trying to mention every single group/person to be fair is getting cringey to me. Also actually there are 8 people in the picture and only 6 words above. Are we going to make a case of the 8th person not being mentioned also?
/r/MensRights31/10/15 07:53 PM
-6

Booo freaking hooo. Did you bother to look at the actual posters? They are fantastic compared to the other shit out there. I'd like to see you post some better ones.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 07:52 PM
22

Has anyone else noticed this weird fad of going up to celebrities and asking them about how badly women are portrayed in film and TV? It seems to me this may be the Justice Warrior crowd overflowing from videogames and I think this is a good trend. Want to know why? For science, this is one of the cringiest moments of this happening I have seen in months. 32:45 if timestamp doesn't work. Dressing up as "strong female characters" and then using that to wine about how tough women have it on TV. Ta…
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:54 AM
18

Sounds like its time to file a Title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:29 AM
0

He wasn't trying to argue that point. He didn't need to either.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 08:38 PM
1

Life isn't fair. No reason to stop doing what can be done.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 04:18 PM
1

We don't need to demand soo much though. If all they did was change the description to "thats the sound of a three stooges face slap! Ha! Ha!" it would be even funnier and harm no one.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 07:42 AM
3

The government is legally required to keep its prisoners reasonably safe while they are incarcerated. This is the same reason prisoners are legally required to receive any necessary medical care while incarcerated. I know the reality of prisons are that they are often not reasonably safe at all. Every prisoner should still be given reasonable safety and as long as we are discussing this particular case then we should be concerned that she be incarcerated in a reasonably safe way. She would obvio…
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:53 AM
3

It is the DUTY of the government to keep its prisoners reasonably safe while they are incarcerated. This is the same reason prisoners are legally required to receive any necessary medical care while incarcerated. Her appearance would obviously put her in great danger in a men's prison. If she cannot be put in the women's prison either then they are just going to have to arrange some special circumstances. Keep her in isolation or by herself in a separate prison section from any other prisoners. …
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:46 AM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:24 AM
1

Donate through paypal? Or maybe use a prepaid credit card?
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:19 AM
12

That is what I was thinking earlier. This could OUR Sarkesian Kickstarter moment. An event to blast us into the mainstream awareness. We should try to stir up the controversy as much as possible to attract attention to this. If this gets big enough instead of this being her last film it could be the start of many.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:17 AM
4

I have watched a couple hours of Milo Yiannopoulos giving interviews and speeches recently. The guy is a damned genius at speaking and writing! This guy is one of the smoothest, most eloquent, and clever speakers I have seen in a long time. He is gay and yet his argument AGAINST gay marriage was magnificent. It was in one of the interviews I watched. We should also be giving him credit for blasting the kickstarter over the goal.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:15 AM
1

Its NOT too late. The show is still being sold commercially and it is being broadcast directly to people's TVs. How about you tell what episode exactly so the rest of us can look at it on NETFLIX also?
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:07 AM
4

Is this a TV show or something online? It looks like it is done by National Geographic, but you didn't provide any links or much detail so there is too much to guess about. If it is a TV show you are talking about you/we can file complaints to the FCC https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/hc/en-us I think making a game on TV out of domestic violence is worth some complaints to the FCC if that is what you are trying to tell us about with your post.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 09:28 PM
2

Thanks. Reddit search turned up nothing.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 06:24 PM
2

Suppose I should make clear that I didn't make this reference library, I only found it.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 12:26 PM
7

Print out 10 copies of this and pass it around the room. https://notehub.org/hpp2i Then when they "accidentally" lose those you pull out your 10 backup copies. That should make a good start. edit: Now I like /u/thebard2000 idea better. If the professor is making you do extra stuff then run with it and make it a performance art. Keep it going. Make it a participatory performance for the class. Give them all a piece of paper and ask them to write down their original or current criticisms, make a c…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:50 AM
1

The problem is that society isn't against women. It never has been. And people associate being pro-women as feminist. 90% of people don't know the anything about what we discuss here on reddit. So you aren't going to find many people at all who are actually against feminism. I don't think asking people if they are against feminism will produce any useful results. I think it would be better to ask questions about their beliefs about equality, rights, gender relations, etc. along with asking wheth…
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:43 AM
1

While the details of the polls are interesting I think we can all agree that identifying as feminist has been in decline over 3 decades. Yes? I don't think a 50% difference in the first and last polls can be attributed to the questions being slightly different.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:26 AM
11

Be sure to document EVERYTHING over the next couple months. It will be useful for divorce proceedings and custody if it gets that far. Lots of links and groups around here that can help with that also.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:16 AM
9

Well fuck, I got stickied. That is my best achievement for today. edit: suppose I should make clear that I didn't make this reference library, I only found it.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 04:10 AM
1

I got 18% from here: http://www.avoiceformen.com/featured/new-poll-results-the-decimation-of-feminism/ and here: https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/31yf4c/feminists_drop_to_only_18_of_population_according/
/r/MensRights26/10/15 03:31 AM
1

So you don't think the number of people who identify as feminists will continue to decline?
/r/MensRights26/10/15 03:28 AM
2

I posted it to /r/MRRef as well.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 02:35 AM
1

and?... the link isn't the point, but it does have relevant info. The point is my question. I want to see what people think.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 02:33 AM
1

I think ignoring feminists is what got us into the situation we are in today. The number of people who call themselves feminists has dropped incredibly fast in recent decades. and to ignore what caused this drop would be a mistake feminism: 1986: 46% 1991: 30% 2001: 25% 2015: 18% 2020: 10%? You don't let up pressure when you have made it this far. SOMETHING has caused this major drop and we should figure out exactly what it is before we decide to forget it. Now as for the mean vs. nice debate I …
/r/MensRights25/10/15 06:55 PM
14

It has been mentioned before but, we do need refresher posts from time to time This is the article those posts go to My question is can we do anything about it? Can we help them? A google search reveals no way to help them at all. It looks like he talks about it constantly on his Google+ account, but I ain't linking there.There are posts from this week there discussing the case.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 06:30 AM
1

I'm not trying to compete. I was attempting to provide some helpful, constructive criticism. I want everyone to get their message out there as best they can. You don't have to take my or anyone else's advice if you don't want to. No one is going to force you.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 02:50 AM
4

I tried to make this list before but nobody was jazzed about it then. Here is what I was able to come up with then. mansplaining manspreading manslaming male gaze male privilege (too broad to count?) bro culture lad culture male(?) rape culture Toxic masculinity manosphere Manterrupted Bropropriating peter pan syndrome And some list someone else allready made up before me. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/396565/ten-ways-men-oppress-women-their-everyday-behavior-katherine-timpf
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:47 AM
2

Love your essay by the way. I have said the exact things a number of times before but nothing as well written or thought or referenced as what you wrote here. Thank you. Others have said as much also, for example. I saved you post immediately after reading it cause its good. Elizabeth Warren has also written about how women in the workforce can be a trap as well though in a different light than we might be looking at it here of course. Warren doesn't know anything about MRAs or men's rights as f…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 02:22 AM
3

I have some fun quotes too. Nothing dog or cat related. I can share a couple if you like? Love your essay by the way. I have said the exact things a number of times before but nothing as well written or thought or referenced as what you wrote here. Thank you. Others have said as much also, for example. I saved you post immediately after reading it cause its good. Elizabeth Warren has also written about how women in the workforce can be a trap as well though in a different light than we might be …
/r/MensRights24/10/15 01:56 AM
0

Its called making conversation. Get over it and stop acting like a SJW over a simple little comment.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 01:54 AM
-8

You have been very busy in your new account over the past 8 days. edit: Its called making conversation you arses. Get over it.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 05:48 AM
3

I often think that with the dawn of the industrial age that equality would have been a natural progression. I agree. Look at everything that has happened regarding various rights of various people over the last 150 years. Too numerous to do all of them fair mention. Workers rights, Native American rights, black rights, women's rights, etc. To make women's rights out to be some special case in over a century of non-stop struggles by everyone to gain more rights is a bit of a stretch. They often b…
/r/MensRights23/10/15 04:22 AM
3

Also Lord Of The Flies was written as a response to another popular book of the day https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Coral_Island
/r/MensRights22/10/15 01:49 AM
-2

Its called CLICKBAIT you fools. It took me 10 seconds to get to the Fullstack Academy staff page and to no surprise to me 11 out of 16 teachers are men and both of the founders are men. And that only took 10 fucking seconds! I looked around more and I can't find any mention or even a hint that the school is women only. Stop falling for clickbait.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:12 PM
4

It would be interesting if /u/girlwriteswhat or the Honey Badgers invited some of them to their shows as guests. It would bring more current attention to them. What do you think /u/typhonblue ?
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:20 AM
5

I was looking up some old articles and posts and ran into this article The Lonely Existence of Mel Feit, Men's-Rights Advocate which is about the founder of the National Center For Men
/r/MensRights18/10/15 09:35 PM
2

also this search has good results https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=infographics&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:17 PM
38

Fellow organizers should get together to watch the fire alarms themselves and then turn in anyone who sets them off for the $1000 reward for reporting a false fire-alarm and identifying the offender.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 12:41 AM
2

It looks like the same battle has been being fought for over 20 years now. I do love the vintage animation shots though.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:57 PM
2

I think you are thinking about this the wrong way. Ridiculous, absurd rules conducting sexual conduct have arisen in many place in the past couple years and it is your mistake to adopt them as your own. These rules she is referring to are absurd and impracticable. Don't be angry at her, be sorry for her for having so completely adopted so a cultish world view.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 07:49 PM
4

I think the decades of physical assaults and the domestic abuse are a good reason to not vote for her.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:39 AM
6

Ohhhhh this is funny. Anita and Zoe's report was so bad the UN apologized for it but, of course, they still plan on going ahead with the report recommendation anyways.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:38 AM
5

From the link: by typhonblueHoney Badger - stickied post We filed our legal claim with the Alberta Provincial Court and the documents were served out of that court September 9th. The defendants are Calgary Expo for breach of contract and injurious falsehood and the Mary Sue for incitement of breach of contract and injurious falsehood. We sent the documents to the defendants September 18th. Calgary Expo has 25 days to respond after receipt. Mary Sue has 47 days to respond after receipt. We are no…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:21 AM
5

Also the discussion on where they think Anita and Zoe’s Excellent UN Adventure will lead to are quite interesting and varied.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:20 AM
8

Beyond the initial weakness of the writing, the report itself is a train wreck of thinly veiled and sometimes completely undisguised mendacity. To bolster the report’s appearance of credibility, the writers engaged in a level of academic chicanery second only to that employed by a highly practiced middle school slacker. They miss-attributed evidence for their claims to sources which do not contain it and in some cases aren’t even about the subject for which they’re being referenced. There were a…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:18 AM
9

So the father viewed her as being so immature that she was effectively a child (therefore there was less of an issue with her raping his son) but he [the father] still had sex with her. The fact that the child was immature enough to need a babysitter would make it seem to be very clear that he was not mature enough to consent to sex with an adult. So the father was having sex with someone not mature enough to consent? Isn't it illegal to have sex with developmentally challenged people? On the ot…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:13 PM
2

We can finally hear some of the other side of the "street harassers" demographic. True, some of them actually will be harassing and threatening but, some of them won't also. I hope she continues her experiment and we hear more about it.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 07:10 PM
10

History lesson time for those of you who can't remember anything past a week ago. A friend and fellow porn star of Mercedes Carrera was attacked and gang raped in front of her kids in her own home about a year ago. http://therealpornwikileaks.com/adult-star-cytherea-attacked-in-home-invasion/ February 6, 2015 And Ever since then Mrs. Mercedes Carrera has been on a mission against SJWs, anti-GAmerGaters, the treatment of the porn industry by feminism, etc. because she was extremely angry by the r…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 06:17 PM
1

This is very old news. It has been reported on many times. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2p9lw4/harvard_professor_criticized_for_suggesting_men/ https://np.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/2payw4/men_are_stupid_the_media/ Breitbart is just rehashing old stuff for page views. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200901/why-men-are-more-intelligent-women
/r/MensRights03/10/15 06:21 AM
1

OP, you should call that number to see if they will help you, a man. If they do offer help to you then perhaps just a polite conversation or comment could bring about more balanced posters for ALL.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 04:29 AM
2

They offered her a deal that didn't include the death penalty. She rejected it. Maybe she should have evaluated her ability to charm jurors more carefully. I am against the death penalty.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:48 AM
5

It has been bouncing around the web for the past week or so.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:59 PM
1

We weren't talking about Spain, we were talking about NOW. In the literary world we call mentioning things like that 'examples'. It wasn't "accidental." Then please show me meeting minutes or summary statements or such in which they say they intentionally help men as well as. If it was on purpose there should be documentation. And I didn't mean for you to simply repeat the words of the 19th amendment. What did it DO? What were the effects on the people?
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:07 PM
1

...Yes. NOW exists to help women, but it's accidentally helps men sometimes while furthering its causes for women. And that is fine. Its them saying 'we help men too' like they do it on purpose that is a problem. They use gender neutral language because they have to, not because they want to. We have anti-discrimination rules that prevent gender specific laws from happening. test question for you: what did the 19th Amendment do? Often referred to as the "Women's Suffrage amendment". If they coul…
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:33 PM

So, on accident then.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 07:34 PM
1

It does have some basis in history though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunandha_Kumariratana 1880, The queen and her daughter drowned when the royal boat capsized while on the way to the Bang Pa-In Royal Palace (Summer palace). Despite the presence of many onlookers, they were forbidden on pain of death to touch the queen – not even to save her life.[1] The grief-stricken Chulalongkorn later erected a memorial to her and his unborn child at the Bang Pa-In Palace.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:37 AM

So they indirectly helped men... on accident? I don't know if you expect thanks for that or something. I think you are just going to have to face the situation at hand and accept that the people here are not going to be friendly towards feminism. The most productive course is to find ways to help out independent of and separate from feminism.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:31 AM
1

Ms. Straughan often does drop the ball on what could be easy to win talking points. She gets too caught up in the moment and lets her enthusiasm sidetrack her. A little more prep sometimes maybe or perhaps taking a professional class on how to take interviews or maybe an instructional debate class or two?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 06:25 AM
2

So whenever you end up talking feminism with a feminist you should say, "No thanks, I'm an atheist. I don't feel like debating your religion with you today."?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:37 PM
2

There is a common phrase called "Going Dutch" "Going Dutch" is a term that indicates that each person participating in a group activity pays for themselves, rather than any person paying for anyone else, particularly in a restaurant bill. It is also called Dutch date, Dutch treat (the oldest form[1]) and "doing Dutch". There are two possible senses—each person paying their own expenses, or the entire bill being split (divided evenly) between all participants. In strict usage, "Going Dutch" refer…
/r/seduction24/09/15 04:28 PM

Another study of equal or greater public awareness and fanfare would be useful to counter this one. For years they have successfully pushed policy when they can't point to an actual definitive study that shows the 1 in 5 statistic. What won't they will do with this one?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:09 AM
33

‘I think of a man, and then I take away accountability and reason,’ he replies. Paradoxically, that is what the feminist lobby seems to be doing about consent. There is also a huge element of hypocrisy about their stance. If a woman is considered to be incapable of giving consent because of the influence of drink, why should a drunken man be held responsible for his actions? Or does memory loss work only on one side? Now there is an idea. Lets start a campaign to encourage ALL MEN who have drunk…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:03 AM
2

This guy gets it. We can nit pick the exact methods this study was done under but they will use this study for years to influence law and policy for decades. We need another study to counter this one. Nit picking will accomplish nothing.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:44 AM
1

Have you seen the TV show Continuum? Its a pretty good show so far: time travel, murder, mayhem, really cool technologies, dystopic future, etc.. Anyways in the show they mention that in the future court judgements are automatically made by computer AI. No human prejudices. Often times it seems that would be far more preferential than all the shit we have to deal with in our modern human system. Barring that though there are so many things we could do to reduce individual human prejudices and fa…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:54 AM
8

If you wan't to enter a debate about "presenting sources" nothing will shut down your partner faster than throwing in an actual source of your own. This took me 10 seconds for frack sake: Study Can't Find Any Men Who Haven't Watched Porn, study canceled!. So every man she has ever interacted with has watched porn. Including every one who didn't rape her, assault her, catcall her, etc.. Actually, why don't you show her this and see what she has to say then?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 06:17 AM
5

Did no one else notice the ERROR IN THE TITLE? Its Oxbridge university and not Oxford university.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:48 AM
2

Ernst and Young in the UK just said they're no longer requiring degrees because it doesn't predict success. In SF, education and other metrics are barely used for hiring criteria. The same thing was said in Outliers: The Story of Success, by Malcolm Gladwell. I could find the specific chapter if you want, but I don't have it on hand right now. To paraphrase, "People only need to be smart ENOUGH to be successful with their degrees. Once they have enough IQ points more does not affect their succes…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:44 AM
5

I posted this same survey last night https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3lvkj1/news_flash_released_today_university_survey/ This survey includes 27 universities and over 150,000 students. We are going to be hearing about this for years.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 03:59 PM
1

I just found something that's going to be really bad for years. Now this sort of thing SCARES me. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3lvkj1/news_flash_released_today_university_survey/ feel free to remove the "np" when you get there.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:44 AM
6

This was mentioned before. Here are some additional links on the situation: Be glad you don't live in Spain. They have "gender violence" laws in effect and approved as constitutional by their courts. Their laws specifically state that when a man commits any act of violence towards a woman its a special, separate kind of crime worse than any other kind of crime. Apparently all a woman has to do is point at a man and say, "he 'gender violenced' me!" He is automatically arrested and jailed until th…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:46 PM

Well, you have a right to your own opinions. I don't agree with them, but I won't tell you to not have them.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:25 PM
0

And we will see if this featured video on youtube creates the same social uproar that all the previous featured videos created. You remember of any of those?
/r/MensRights19/09/15 10:15 AM

I'll blither and you keep panicking prematurely. Sounds like a good compromise to me.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:52 AM

Do you know how easy it is to get a couple million video views? We are only giving this more attention.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:46 AM
0

It might grow more, but so far how about we all stop overreacting? Sometimes productions flop.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:31 AM
3

Here is an easy and (imo) clever way to point out how absurd this whole "women in STEM crisis" is. If you happen to be in one of these speeches then ask the question (at the appropriate time), "I'm honored by your efforts. (or some other praise to soften them up) I experience misogyny and discrimination frequently in my life and my career. (make yourself relate-able and one of the group) Please tell me what other fields are women under-represented in and excluded by misogyny and need our activis…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:58 AM
-2

Lets not make a mountain out of a molehill here. Lets not overreact. Few people seem to be particularly excited or driven by this video. Look at the overall reactions so far: https://np.reddit.com/r/AmericanHorrorStory/duplicates/3lehg0/abit_out_of_topic_lady_gaga_released_a_new_music/ https://np.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/3lef19/lady_gagas_new_music_video_aims_to_shed_light_on/ So far the whole thing has about 300 votes and 100 comments in total. Small potatoes. Preaching to the 'col…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 08:01 AM
1

I don't have time to get into all the specifics right now. If you really want to do something about this situation then you can look for chrome training or chrome how to videos on youtube. Its not that complicated you should figure it out in a couple hours or less.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:30 AM
1

Is the test on a web page? Is it in a browser like IE, Firefox, or Chrome?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:02 AM
1

He does get a bit emotional and righteous at times, but overall the video is rather good. Lots of facts and sources. Its a good run through.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:05 AM
1

Now I would like to hear more about THAT part if you have any links handy?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:13 AM

They only ask for "an eighth" when they are buying weed. But almost all drugs often come in pre-packaged sizes. There is the classic "8-ball" which is a small ball of black tar heroin/cocaine. Usually cost around $20. There are other sizes of course.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:17 AM
2

At first I thought it was a repost, but its not The stories are just eerily similar.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 06:13 PM
1

I am sorry to have to tell you this, but every second you spent typing out this reply was wasted. I understand the situation fine and your deformed abortion of an attempted analogy helps in no way at all. Its is this group's response to this story that is the problem and your reply is a prefect example of the very problem I was pointing out. This article is an isolated incident of an individual woman breaking some laws because of her personal issues. The problem is this group devolving into a co…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:04 AM
1

I would take Mitschu's comment here and apply the first paragraph just to the criminal justice system in the US. While I know the sentencing gap is pretty much exactly the same in the UK and probably other First World Countries as well I will just focus on the US for now. you're looking down at an iceberg from the bow asking how come nobody is talking about it, while ignoring that the ship is simultaneously cracked in half, burning down, being bombarded with cannon fire, getting rammed, being bo…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:40 AM
1

When I went to Jury selection they had flyers in the room explaining that jury nullification is not an appropriate way apply laws you disagree with. Knowledge of jury nullification is so common it probably won't get you kicked off the jury automatically.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 06:46 PM
1

Instructions unclear. Only have vial of bottled water.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 04:11 AM

How does someone get into this "testosterone supplementing" group?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:12 AM
2

Maybe, but its the lawyers job to present the case the defendant wishes to present. If she is TELLING him to argue the case this way then he has to do it.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:11 AM
-14

Ah yes "Disugsting". This subs version of the "This" post.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 11:28 PM
2

Its more of a classist moniker than racist. Ghetto can apply to any group stuck in the poorer, lower economic status area. Also, technically speaking, ghetto doesn't even have to apply to poor people. It can apply to any isolated group of people in a larger city.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 12:56 AM
34

Some people can hack it. Some people can't. Which one are you?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:40 PM
0

They are afraid of men being able to manipulate women as easily as women manipulate men.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:12 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_nudity#Legal_position In some states, such as Oregon, public nudity is legal and protected as free speech, as long as there is not the "intent to arouse".
/r/MensRights18/08/15 12:57 AM
3

ALL of Oregon actually.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 10:42 PM
15

Rosa Parks is remembered because she was a trained activist. She was an active member of the NAACP and a secretary working for them and had training on how to refuse. I am not criticizing her just telling the facts. edit link: http://www.history.com/news/10-things-you-may-not-know-about-rosa-parks
/r/MensRights17/08/15 10:41 PM
1

I ran into this a while ago. It might be useful for your friend in someway. ORIGINAL RESEARCH - The Mountain of Evidence for a Massive International Pedophile Ring Protected by Police and Intelligence Agencies
/r/MensRights17/08/15 01:18 PM
2

I don't have any more current information, but the fact that they paid the women $5000 each for their troubles is pretty much proof of implementation to me.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 01:56 AM
7

I would phrase it as by definition affirmative action is discrimination. I say that as a matter of fact not as a complaint. If some group faces more or worse challenges than other groups then it isn't necessarily a bad things to try to give them a boost somewhere else along the line. So affirmative action is a system of positive discrimination to counter negative discrimination somewhere else. With that said each case needs to be looked at individually to decide if it is necessary.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:59 AM
3

Here is my favorite example of Finnish Viking metal KORPIKLAANI - Wooden Pints And here is the list of Swedish Death Metal bands. Which is a very long list for a country of its size.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:49 AM
15

Actually it works out to 1.5 women to every 1 man. Or 3 women to every 2 men if you want to go with whole numbers.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:38 AM
10

another article: http://www.thelocal.se/20100318/25604
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:38 PM

You are very angry and that doesn't make for good discussion. It leads to errors and exaggerations. That's my point. Also Chivalry can be funny.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:06 PM
1

"This" doesn't make it any clearer. They attack scientists as well as the science. Do you want the attacks against scientists like Rosetta mission expert Dr Matt Taylor or when they called the Principia Mathematica a "rape manual" or all the times they misrepresent statistics for all sorts of purposes?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 10:02 AM
1

For a little perspective here is a complete database going back to 2000 for crimes committed by athletes in multiple sports and the consequences of their arrests. http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/arrests/ NFL players get fired for numerous kinds of offences
/r/MensRights15/08/15 07:02 AM
1

Even the suffragettes in the UK were responsible for the "white ribbon" campaign to shame healthy men into volunteering for military service. Were they interested in volunteering themselves? No. In fact, much female opposition to suffrage was based on the notion that if women were going to vote, they would also be expected to subject themselves to conscription in war. Oddly, suffragettes were able to pull this off while shirking their military obligations. Why? Because we live in a matriarchal /…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:22 AM
1

I would tell them that their belief in the utter powerlessness and non-agency of women in every aspect of society and history is more dehumanizing of women than almost anything anyone else has said.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:59 AM
1

You are trying too hard. The problem is their reality is warped and they form all their beliefs from that. Its like people who live in an echo chamber of Rush Limbaugh and watch only Fox News and are absolutely sure there is a war against Christianity and everyone is going to be forced to have gay sex at gunpoint, etc. Try telling them they are living in a reality bubble that isn't the way the real world is and if they don't show any signs of being able to understand that then tell them you are …
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:56 AM

Could you explain more on what you want exactly? That is a rather vague question.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:35 AM
7

This is part of an actual comment I read a while ago: But it's run by men! Is it women not enforcing safety standards at dangerous jobs? Is it women voting to cut spending on the social safety net? Is it women who, from the earliest age, reinforce toxic ideas of masculinity that mean showing weakness (I mean, sometimes, but it's overwhelmingly men). When men have 70 or 80% of the power they get 70 or 80% of the blame. Men are the majority in literally every legislature and nearly every boardroom…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:15 AM
1

It means the man has to prove he had consent or he is guilty. It means he is guilty until he can prove his innocence.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:45 AM
2

I have that same question whenever petitions come up. What are we supposed to do with it? What is is supposed to accomplish? These petitions seem like karma points for non-redditors.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:30 AM
8

I think going on NATIONAL TV to brag about your crimes isn't the best strategy to get a lenient sentence.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:33 AM
3

I know it was a political move. It was a much better sub before it was front paged.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:38 AM
1

Have you read her book? I ask because your title is way off from what the book portrays.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:06 AM
2

The book is OK. The title to this post is Click-Bait though and hardly bears any relation to the book.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:03 AM
6

/r/twoxchromosomes isn't about women's rights. Its just a place for women to hang out and talk. Or for people (men and women) to hang out and talk about woman stuff.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 03:52 AM
1

Yep. The whole title of this post is click-bait of the worst sort. And i'll bet 90% of the comments are people who haven't read the book either.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 03:49 AM
1

And you still haven't told OP that.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:53 AM
1

I am not OP. I allready linked OP to an answer 2 days ago. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/26173x/14_year_old_stands_up_for_his_rights_and_informed/chmvev0 Where were you 2 days ago when OP asked his questions?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 05:45 AM
1

I didn't see you answering OP's question.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 05:02 AM
1

It sounds like you might have read A People's History of the United States at some point. I have tried to say what you said a few times in the past as well. I posted an article a while ago which is a socialist analysis and complete rejection of 'patriarchy theory'. The article was written in 1981 so it goes to show that not everyone was fooled by the Marxist-Feminist classist view of male/female gender roles even a long time ago. "I want to reject the concept of patriarchy as at best a muddled t…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:17 PM
1

Ignore my previous comment. These guys said it so much better and with so much more detail: https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3gkf09/why_do_the_elites_support_feminism/
/r/MensRights11/08/15 04:25 PM
1

I do agree that there is a wider disease, but its not progressivism. To use the classic phrase, "Follow the money." Have you read A People's History of the United States by chance? The book makes the case that the People's history is one of those in power constantly playing everyone else against each other. Its a good book and easy to find if you have the time to read it. I can go into more detail if you like. Its something we see to this very day with the political parties pitting people agains…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:03 PM
1

You made your points well enough but its impossible to get them through to Pornography_saves_li. He sees everything as an attack or deceit or trickery and the only way to deal with it is by hardcore counter attack. Pornography_saves_li doesn't believe in talking with the enemy, doesn't empathize with the enemy.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 05:03 PM
1

I know I offered links, but this stuff is easy YO. Just go to /r/askreddit and search for "men raped" https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/search?q=men+raped&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all I count ~10 posts in the first 100 results. Here are a couple: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/27axwi/serious_men_who_have_been_raped_by_women_what/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/v73r4/men_who_have_been_raped_by_women_can_you_tell_us/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/2eq…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 04:34 PM
2

Just click on the "Other Discussions" link at the top to find out. This has been posted to reddit several times in the past. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/26173x/14_year_old_stands_up_for_his_rights_and_informed/chmvev0
/r/MensRights10/08/15 04:27 AM
1

"Patriarchy" was originally just an anthropological term: pa·tri·arch·y noun a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line. That is the dictionary definition of patriarchy. Not much room in that definition for all the things some people think it means and does. What does it mean to you as a feminist?
/r/MensRights08/08/15 07:37 AM
1

There have been around a dozen large posts like that one over the years here. They are easy enough to find if you look for them. Interested in links anyone?
/r/MensRights08/08/15 07:16 AM
7

This is part of an actual comment I read a while ago: But it's run by men! Is it women not enforcing safety standards at dangerous jobs? Is it women voting to cut spending on the social safety net? Is it women who, from the earliest age, reinforce toxic ideas of masculinity that mean showing weakness (I mean, sometimes, but it's overwhelmingly men). When men have 70 or 80% of the power they get 70 or 80% of the blame. Men are the majority in literally every legislature and nearly every boardroom…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:58 AM

Everything is worse when it happens to a woman. EVERYTHING! This message brought to you by Feminism 101.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:19 PM
11

Its funny isn't it. They constantly claim things like "only 10% of rapes are reported" then they turn around and do the complete opposite with false rape accusations and only count that ones that are reported and verified.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:09 PM
2

Good luck with this. I have tried to suggest people calm down a few times and it is never received well.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:15 AM
-2

I have looked into it before https://np.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/3d089c/this_week_in_science_braintobrain_interface/ct0yx2l
/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:50 PM
7

Masculinity wasn't always a scheme to trick men into being mindless self sacrificing fools. Historically men also received many benefits to being a man as well. They were the head of the household, they owned everything, they had the vote, etc. Historical gender roles for men and women each had their benefits and costs.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:40 PM
1

I borrowed a little from the other thread you were commenting in. Almost had it right, dangit!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:14 AM
2

a short summary: The plaintiff searched out the creator of a game on social media and in her words "Sic'ed the internet on him". Then calls his employers to inform them he's a misogynist. Then when another man, who was her friend, refuses to participate in the hate campaign and tells her that her behavior was no better than the face punch game creator she gives a tedX talk about it defending her actions as a hero. THEN SHE SUES HIM (her friend) FOR HARASSMENT?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:08 AM

Online petitions are pretty useless.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:41 PM
2

Here is one little idea. We can change laws by making the language gender neutral. When they make ban's against FMG then we make sure they use gender neutral language in the laws and accidentally ban MGM at the same time. It would be a big pain for them to change it later to re-include MGM.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:42 AM
1

You seem to focus almost entirely on gender and religious issues on reddit. I would be interested hearing about your journey of how you ended up here asking questions. What say you?
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:36 AM
3

Semen has hormones in it. Hormones affect human behavior. Don't know what it has to do with this sub.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:34 AM
0

Yes, of course she was spying on her children. The point is that she was specifically spying on her children and not her husband in general. Can you blame a mother for being extra vigilant in caring for her children while making effort to not spy on others when they are not around her children otherwise? Yes, she may have broken some wiretapping laws, but the circumstances of her lawbreaking are quite understandable.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 04:00 AM
-3

Clearly she has trust issues. That doesn't make her a bad person or mother though. A little counseling would probably work better than jail time and fines. She is more spying on the children than she is spying on the father as she put the recorder in the diaper bag which goes where ever the kids go. The recorder isn't spying on the father when the children leave since the diaper bag leaves with them. If it is legal to wear a recorder on yourself at all times then there is a case to be made that …
/r/MensRights27/07/15 12:15 AM
-1

Well I won't learn if people don't explain how saying things like "having actual recordings of an event is a pretty damned good standard of evidence" is idiotic. Will I? Please explain it to me.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:59 PM
1

Has your friend learned from her experience yet?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:56 PM
-2

Disagreeing with the circle jerk is trolling now? Check my history to see how much of a troll I am. Stop jumping to conclusions and using the 'troll' label to just dismiss me.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:48 PM
-3

She found zero evidence and she made zero claims of abuse and for this you criticize? Every day here there are posts about false accusations of every sort being made against men and then when a woman doesn't make a false claim you complain just as much. Whats up with that? of all the ways you can get evidence of abuse do you think that sticking a recorder on a kid is the best way to do this? I didn't say "best" but having actual recordings of an event is a pretty damned good standard of evidence…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:22 PM
-2

So your position is as soon as the kids are out of the house and out of your sight then they are on their own? Out of sight out of mind/caring?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:06 PM
0

For what good legal reason should a parent not be allowed to record what happens to their children? Where do you think the line should be?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:49 PM
-8

No, taking the "breaking the law for any reason no matter what the law says makes you a bad person " position is called being pathetic.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:36 PM
-6

No, what is pathetic is taking the "breaking the law for any reason no matter what the law says makes you a bad person " position.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:35 PM
-2

Yet this particular woman went to great lengths to have evidence before making any claims. So what do we do? Criticize her and make her out to be like all those who accuse without evidence.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:00 PM
-8

She is the legal parent/guardian of the children. I think parental rights would allow her some rights with what she leaves with the children.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:54 PM
-8

She was looking for proof rather than just making baseless accusations with no evidence? How horrible of her!
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:23 PM
-12

She is a bad woman and she did something wrong and pathetic And you ask "How are we attacking this woman?" You would think she would find something after getting caught NINE times but clearly she felt the need for the 10th cause--- ---cause that is called being a vigilant parent. I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not. Every day here there are complaints about false accusations of every sort being made by women and mothers against men yet when a woman comes along who goes out of her way …
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:14 PM
-16

We are attacking this women because this post on this particular sub comes with the attitude of "look at the BAD thing this woman did" as do soo many posts about women here have. She was trying to protect her kids by coming up with actual hard evidence of abuse and not just going with hearsay and unfounded accusations. Its a shame she ran into wiretaping laws while doing so.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:24 PM
2

This was mentioned before. Here are some additional links on the situation: Be glad you don't live in Spain. They have "gender violence" laws in effect and approved as constitutional by their courts. Their laws specifically state that when a man commits any act of violence towards a woman its a special, separate kind of crime worse than any other kind of crime. Apparently all a woman has to do is point at a man and say, "he 'gender violenced' me!" He is automatically arrested and jailed until th…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 01:06 AM
1

Well how did the followup discussion go? Did she realize eventually realize that everything she mentioned was wrong? Any of it?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:59 AM
2

This post from 2 years ago is a MUST READ for starting to understand the child sex rings situation. It is about 6 pages and very damning of hundreds of people in government. ORIGINAL RESEARCH - The Mountain of Evidence for a Massive International Pedophile Ring Protected by Police and Intelligence Agencies
/r/MensRights25/07/15 12:13 AM
1

Unfortunately, like most other things in the world, the comments on reddit follow Sturgeon's law. We just have to be vigilant and try to show the best face to new people.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 04:37 PM

A penis is not a requirement for being here.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 03:44 PM
2

Well I hope some people comment on the article page. It would be extra nice if they were Australian commentators.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:08 PM
5

So she goes to the court and proves the new guy passes some arbitrary test for being a decent father figure. There go your weekend visiting privileges.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:21 AM
5

Its an interesting point that could be useful sometimes, but it can backfire too easily. So little Bobby and little Susie need a father? No problem, they will have the guy I left you for and I am marrying now. They have a father, who isn't you anymore.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:05 AM
1

So? How does it look when someone tells you "you can't be sexist towards men"?
/r/MensRights22/07/15 03:19 PM
1

So you laugh at their assertion first.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 09:58 AM
3

Excellent! I am going to have to repost this a couple times to make sure enough people see it.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 05:52 AM
7

The goodmenproject works on the same basis as the australian abuse hotline.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 10:17 AM
4

Actually there are lots of videos of guys randomly kissing women and getting away with it. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=guy+kissing+random+people Not nearly enough of them get tasered in my opinion. OP's video was likely inspired by this existing trend.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 06:48 AM

That would have been a fun story to read. Any chance of finding it?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:13 AM
1

I never contributed to /r/fatpeoplehate . I merely acknowledge their right to have a place to express their feelings.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 04:45 PM
1

How much does you friend know about MRAs? Does she reddit? I ask because I would like to know what non-redditing feminists (and non-redditing people in general) know about MRAs if at all. Also it would be interesting to know what and why your friend thinks of feminism and how that differs from the general attitude about society we have here? What fundamental ideas is her feminism based on?
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:57 AM
1

People need somewhere to express their feelings and thoughts. I think the internet is a good place for that. Sharing their thoughts on the internet is a completely different category from publicly walking up to people and verbally assaulting them directly.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:06 AM
2

Yes. As a fat guy myself (morbidly obese according to my doctor last checkup) I thought /r/fatpeoplehate was hilarious and I miss that subreddit. Obesity has become an epidemic health CRISIS. Its becoming a GLOBAL CRISIS. People say fatpeoplehate was leaking out into other subs, but I don't think that was the case. I think /r/fatpeoplehate struck a chord with the public consciousness about this crisis and it showed them their unease and disgust with the crisis we face wasn't just them, its every…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:48 PM
1

You have never heard of Bill Burr before? He has libraries of great stuff you could listen to. Spend a couple days going over his videos on youtube. You won't regret it.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:21 PM
1

When did we stop requiring people to NP links?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:15 PM
7

Selective enforcement of a rule is proof of discrimination. If there is a rule that you never enforce and then pick out one person to enforce it on that is clear evidence of discrimination. This can be used for wrongful employment termination and I imagine it can be used in cases like this one as well.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:14 PM
8

$20 says there were plenty of booths that had their own materials and some 'cross promotional' materials from their friends, colleges, other events, etc.. I have never been to a convention where I didn't see this happen.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 04:57 PM
-2

No he doesn't have to be polite. He is angry and insulting and pretty much yelling at them by his choice. That is why his videos deserve to be in mensrants.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 05:34 PM

I am no fan of Sargon of Akkad. At least half of each his videos are just insults and angrily calling people stupid. I would move any of his videos to mensrants. If you want quality work then go for thunderfoot instead. edit: -9? Is that the best you can do?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:23 PM
1

I would tell her that if she doesn't trust you to tell the truth or be honest with her then you can't have a relationship with her. She is calling you dishonest and a liar.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:51 PM
1

When I think of intersectionality I think of how people keep using it against movember.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:38 PM
1

We are not so concerned with hard to see, nearly invisible, subtle sexisms that women face when we have so any concrete problems for men that need to be dealt with. You might say, "well feminism is fighting for men too." But so what if it is? Is there anything wrong with us trying to fix these problems in our own way?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:32 PM
2

That isn't socialism. It is State Capitalism. Learn a little will you.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:05 PM
1

I know the constant posts here about "look at this bad thing a woman did!" can create an unfriendly atmosphere. Sorry about that. Might I suggest a short 7 minute video by Patrick Stewart in which he talks about his support for women and men equally. His father was violent and abusive when he was growing up, but he learned that his father also suffered from severe and untreated PTSD from his service in WWII. VIDEO: Patrick Stewart's Strong Words About Domestic Violence also this https://www.yout…
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:58 PM
1

It was a really bad fad that popped up after that music video came out last year but it has really been dieing down since then. Her more recent videos aren't like this one.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 06:05 PM
2

It seems pretty clearly to me to be a satirical video targeted at making women look at their social positions in society. Its a little hard to gauge the context of the video but I believe "target women" means 'hey women how does this popular portrayal of husbands and dads reflect on you when you and our culture if you don't speak out against it?' In either case the video is useful as a very well put together compilation of the "husbands are morons" stereotype that pervades our society.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:34 AM
1

RemindMe! 3 weeks maybe remind me bot works in this sub.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 01:47 AM
1

Nope. Sorry.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 01:43 AM
1

I am glad I am not the only one here who realizes people make mistakes while drunk. Hopefully she uses this incident as a learning experience. Hopefully you update us in a couple weeks or months to tell us how she has used this experience to improve herself. pls deliver OP.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 01:31 AM
4

And if you follow some of the other discussions you find this video in the comments. Its a compilation of husbands/fathers being portrayed as hopeless, clumsy fools. Target Women - Doofy Husbands
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:18 PM

I too see some /r/mensrights on /r/all sometimes. When posts get upvoted to over 1000 it happens sometimes.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:53 PM

How about a bot the tell us "THIS THREAD HAS BEEN LINKED FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE ON REDDIT"? Why don't we have one of those here?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:38 PM
1

Far better than Sargon of Akkad who just gets more and more bitter and insulting.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:29 AM
10

That is not a Venn diagram, it is a Euler diagram http://blog.visual.ly/euler-and-venn-diagrams/
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:46 PM
3

Good point. "Aborting" an allready born child could be interpreted in bad ways. Such as infanticide...
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:43 AM
5

Your comment is so spot on it deserves its own post. So many times people have called me crazy for bringing up the idea of financial abortion, telling me its a ridiculous idea. The truth is that women allready have this right and then we get called crazy/misogynistic for asking for the same right they have. Here you go "REDDIT SILVER"!
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:08 AM
8

If you want to make them angry call it GBTL instead. There used to be a debate about exactly how to arrange the letters and guess who won? Switch those around again to put the "L" in last place and see the sparks fly. That might get them off your back for a while.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:41 PM
1

Well OP /u/undoxablealt you found a bunch of responses now. You better use them.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 04:52 PM
1

Where can I see "The Mask You Live In" ?
/r/MensRights05/07/15 08:45 AM
2

Agreed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4EDhdAHrOg Its a fundamental difference in men and women in how they deal with their problems. Women want someone to sympathize and be compassionate about their problem/suffering. They NEED the emotional group support more than they need the problem to be fixed.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 06:33 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4EDhdAHrOg Its a fundamental difference in men and women in how they deal with their problems. Women want someone to sympathize and be compassionate about their problem/suffering. They NEED the emotional group support more than they need the problem to be fixed.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 06:31 AM
1

Here are a few more links. I am sure at least a couple of them are the kind you wanted. http://anti-feminism-pro-equality.tumblr.com/post/97170153236/myplaceinfeminism-heres-an-article-about
/r/MensRights05/07/15 06:15 AM
1

Good point. Goooood point. I was basing my guess on the fact that I subscribed to /r/TWOXCHROMOSOMES on the same day I subscribed to this subreddit. Other people aren't like me though so you are probably right.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 04:39 AM
5

Because he likes a variety of viewpoints.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 03:42 PM
-1

This belongs in /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights03/07/15 05:12 AM
5

I am sure you will have lots of fun conversations with her.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 05:09 AM
-1

The whiny tumblrization of comments here bothers me also. I wish they would show a little more self control.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:31 PM
2

repost
/r/MensRights01/07/15 06:57 AM

This video is solely about FEMEN and not about feminism in general. They are the TEA PARTY of feminist groups. Not exactly the most representative example of all feminism.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 05:15 AM
2

This video was frontpaged on /r/videos 2 days ago. It was quite a wonderful discussion. http://np.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/3b1lka/ohio_university_tries_to_ban_tshirts_with_mild/
/r/MensRights27/06/15 08:51 PM
3

I am talking specifically about the two examples the poster above referred to. I have read Norah Vincent's books Self-Made Man AND Voluntary Madness and I don't think her experience is relateable to some grade school cross-dressing game.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:34 PM
-6

Those are wildly different cases with very different reasons behind them. You can't possibly relate them to this situation so generally.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:01 PM
4

I do occasionally get yelled at for being a regular poster here so it is a valid worry. As my username might indicate I have no problem with lurkers though. You are welcome here anytime.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:52 PM
-3

I am curious, not accusatory. What brings you here to this sub? You have never commented here before in your reddit history or even mentions MRAs. Is this a sort of long time lurker first time poster situation? How do you know about us here? What have you heard about us?
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:31 PM
1

Women make the majority of household goods purchases, especially stuff like toilet paper. They are simply pandering to their customer base. Follow the money.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 07:23 AM
1

Agreed. This post doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:48 AM
2

After all these years of TED it gets harder and harder to find new and truly amazing speakers. Lots more chaff in TED TALKS these days.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:41 AM
-7

They are complaining about him being nice to Sarkeesian the other night. Give em a day and they will get over it.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:18 AM

Did you actually read the book? I have. She clearly states the book is just a telling of her own personal experience and not meant to be a definitive report on our society or culture.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 11:43 PM
3

fta: The rise of this new feminism in the West is strange, for two reasons. The first is that all the other political movements of which feminism was once considered a close cousin have withered. Student radicalism — of the progressive variety — is a thing of the past. Left-wing groups continue to shrink. The anti-war movement is a shadow of its former self. And yet feminism, which in its modern form emerged around the same time as those movements, is soaring, This is explained easily enough. Al…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 09:17 AM
6

Damn. She sure knows how to hit hard.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:37 AM
1

It is called "Going Dutch" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_Dutch Tell her "lets go Dutch on this date".
/r/seduction08/06/15 06:17 AM
1

Does it not make sense to primarily focus on the primary victims of a obstructive group? If you want to make a point of who is causing the problem then your answer would be men. If you want to make a point of who is the victim then your answer is again men. Why do you keep trying to make this about women? Either way you look at it the infographic clearly enough is demonstrating that men need help.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 08:27 AM
1

Where have you gone? You left so quickly. We were having so much fun talking with you. I hope we didn't scare you.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 05:29 AM
1

Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought. Matsuo Basho
/r/MensRights04/06/15 04:36 PM
4

It does apply to BOTH girls and boys. Warren Farrell (and others) has wrote in depth about the problem of single parent households whether the parent is the dad or mom. Children do better in 2 parent households. So far there haven't been enough same-sex households to make any statistical proofs that they are as beneficial as male-female households, but we will find out soon enough given current trends.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:05 AM
2

It does apply to BOTH girls and boys. Warren Farrell (and others) has wrote in depth about the problem of single parent households whether the parent is the dad or mom. Children do better in 2 parent households. So far there haven't been enough same-sex households to make any statistical proofs that they are as beneficial as male-female households, but we will find out soon enough given current trends.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 03:04 AM
1

This sort of intense scholarly analysis is exactly what we need around here. The long battle cannot be won solely by memes, facebook posts, and /r/pussypassdenied posts posing as /r/mensrights posts. A great deal of current opponent ideology is founded on (flawed) marxist theory equating men to bourgeois and women to proletariat and we need equally indepth analysis to counter them. If you look through my posting history as I have looked through your you might find this. What brings you here afte…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:59 PM
1

We have heard and responded to these exact "concerns" many, many, 1, 2, times in the past allready. How about you look into the subreddit history a bit before continuing with your concerns. black men gay men trans men and shit like this A man who wants equality for all people (regardless of gender, race, religion, etc.) would be a human rights activist (or feminist). If that is so then why don't feminists change their name to human rights activist or equalists or whatever? When they do so might …
/r/MensRights26/05/15 04:48 PM
1

Its pretty fracking simple: read the sidebar. When you have read these get back to us. Suggested Reading List: The Myth of Male Power - Warren Farrell The War Against Boys - Christina Hoff Sommers Who Stole Feminism - Christina Hoff Sommers The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature - Steven Pinker
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:51 AM
56

Technically men are jailed for failing to obey the order of the court. The order of the court being to pay money whether they have it or not. They are jailed for being unable to follow impossible to follow orders.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:31 AM
14

There is nothing pleasant about people being fatally shot by police. Justified or not.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:39 AM
6

If this is a HIGHSCHOOL and they are putting up posters about DRUNK girls then I suggest you put in big, bold, capital letters on the posters. "If SHE IS WASTED THEN SHE SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE POLICE AND THE SCHOOL AUTHORITIES FOR UNDERAGE DRINKING AND SHE SHOULD BE SUSPENDED FROM SCHOOL AND OTHERWISE PUNISHED FOR HER ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES." It would be the responsible thing to do.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:42 AM
2

Either way it is still an issue. Thus dress codes are good ideas.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:02 AM

This low effort post does nothing for anyone. edit: the moderation policy if anyone bothered to read it: No advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:39 AM
1

Shame you left. I missed my chance to disagree with you 3 months ago.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:25 AM
1

Yes. The law is a bit different in the US than it is in the UK(?). For starters anyone can be arrested and put in jail for up to 24 hours without being charged with a crime. For example it can take a couple hours for charges to be officially filed or everyone might be busy at that time handling some serious event, or they need to decide exactly which crime to charge someone with etc. Or drunks get thrown in jail overnight to sleep it off "drunk tank" as we call it over here. Of course this can a…
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:29 AM
8

You should add a QR code that links to the study/research. Or that links to whatever. QR codes are the new hip thing for posters. You certainly can't expect people to type in a website address themselves.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:22 AM

How many times are we going to post this story? It has been on here a dozen times allready.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 03:12 AM
3

If it was a "credible" call then does that give them a free pass to force their way into every apartment in the complex?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:54 PM
19

Do you know how easy it is to make up probably cause? Arrested for resisting arrest. Arrested for appearing drunk. Arrested because someone said they heard a woman screaming. You think cops always follow the law?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:53 PM
27

No they don't. The only cause they need is they were called there under domestic violence pretenses and there is a man and a woman there. Its like throwing people in the drunk tank (jail) overnight because they are publicly drunk. They let you go in the morning without any charges being made.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:41 PM
14

Do you think then that a 911 call about "I heard screaming" gives them a free pass to force their way into every apartment in the complex?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:40 PM
10

The obviously didn't hear screaming coming from her apartment since she was home ALONE. I am sure /u/Vashara would have mentioned if she was playing loud music of TV that the cops could have mistaken for screaming.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:34 PM
5

You didn't have any visible signs of injury did you? There wasn't furniture thrown around behind you was there? They can't go an just their "feelings".
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:25 PM
48

In many places in the US it is mandatory for the police to arrest the man when they are called to domestic violence situations. No matter what the circumstances they are required to arrest the man. This is thanks to the Duluth Model being forced onto us for a couple decades.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:23 PM
8

The police didn't hear anyone screaming themselves. They only had the neighbor saying she heard someone screaming. That is not enough for them to force entry without a warrant.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:18 PM
2

from the article: So, by Anita’s own admission, she knew 4chan had a hate-on for her already when she started her Kickstarter, and still left the comments open. Weird! Of course, it’s even easier to debunk her; if the Kickstarter was the start of the harassment, why did she already have her comments and ratings turned off? I haven’t gotten a single one of her defenders to answer that.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:05 AM
1

examples of male benefit at female expense. Could you please list a few of those?
/r/MensRights01/05/15 11:07 PM
1

I think it makes its point well enough. Women's groups try to say they are so oppressed because of men. This graphic shows that men actually have it worse than women so how is it that they are the oppressed ones?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 11:59 PM
3

Then I suggest feminist go THERE and help out. The "men's oppression of women" you mentioned is entirely about here. The infographic we are discussing is entirely about the modern western world and your counterpoints are also entirely about the modern western world and my counter-counterpoints are also about here and not there. Do you have anything more to say about here? Or are you sufficiently convinced by my counter points?
/r/MensRights30/04/15 05:43 AM
1

I would suggest specifying "suicide DEATHS" rather than just "suicides" because someone will definitely and fairly bring up "suicide attempts" for debate if you don't. Also if you search for "infographic" on /r/MensRights then you will find a dozen or two golden oldies with great info.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 05:33 AM
3

You make a good point, but there is a bigger more important point here. The current of theory behind women's oppression is that patriarchy oppresses women to the benefit of men. However the statistics make it pretty clear that men aren't benefiting from all this oppression at all. Apparently we are actually "oppressing" ourselves far more than we are oppressing women. How is it that the 'oppressed' (women) live longer, happier, healthier, less violent lives than the people supposedly oppressing …
/r/MensRights30/04/15 04:55 AM
3

He is asking why don't men 'attempt' suicide in the same ineffective ways that women do? There are plenty of ways to effectively kill yourself and leave an intact body as well. Women could as easily kill themselves as often as men do and leave their bodies intact. But they have a ~90% fail rate? That can't be unintentional either consciously or unconsciously. I believe he is suggesting that women know society will jump at the chance to 'save' a 'suicidal' woman so that is why they have something…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:48 AM
1

Men have been a minority on college campuses for a decade allready. How does a diversity officer justify telling a minority to not attend a "diversity" meeting?
/r/MensRights25/04/15 08:38 AM
14

I have thought quite a bit about this rape culture they are trying to make real. It goes like this: Premise 1: Any dissatisfaction of any kind of any amount for any reason at any time about a sexual experience can ONLY be explained as rape. So you are either absolutely, totally, 100% delighted with every last bit for every single second of your sexual situation or you were raped. Premise 2: All 'rape' is an intentional, deliberate, willful act on the part of the rapist. Since no one would ever c…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 09:31 PM
1

According to Kinsey surveys ~10% of people have some homosexual tendencies while at least 95% of people have heterosexual tendencies. Same sex sleeping arrangements are far less likely to create problems than mixed sex quarters. Its a numbers game.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:06 AM
6

You are using words but they aren't coming together in any way that makes sense. The wage gap doesn't have to be 'illegitimize[d]' because there is no wage gap. Men work more hours and work more dangerous, higher paying jobs. Men and women DO earn the same pay for the same work. Men just work more. Men being 95% of workplace deaths is an issue and it is discrimination that the sex difference is largely ignored by the public at large. That is not the same as 'oppression'.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 08:35 AM
7

Figure out everywhere you were when she filed a police report against you. Did you use your credit card in that time? Did you go to any gas stations? Did you pass any ATMs? There are video cameras everywhere. Get evidence to show you weren't there.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:01 AM
12

tldr: feminist social theories define my reality therefore anything that doesn't agree with my predetermined feminist reality must be wrong.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 05:28 AM
3

I agree with you that some/alot of sections of AEI are extremely conservative. Which I find very distasteful politically. But we shouldn't judge Christina Hoff Sommers based on things said by other people, we should judge her as an individual.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 02:12 AM
2

Dammit. This video was posted allready. I didn't see it because people don't post the share link for youtube videos like they should. Oh well, he linked comments are nice.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 02:56 PM
3

I posted because the video really is hilarious and the prank is so perfectly done. The comments are just a bonus. A prank done right makes for good conversation I guess.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 02:29 PM
1

The Japanese aren't scared shitless into sanatizing everything and making it PC like we are in America. There was this huge discussion just yesterday about the censorship of J-anime for American audiences: TIL Sailor Moon in Japan had a lesbian couple, Sailor Uranus and Sailor Neptume. In the English translation this is censored, stating they are cousins instead. Due to problematic dubbing flirting was left in, leading some viewers to infer their relationship as incestuous. A little icecube of r…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 12:34 PM
1

You should format this post for a college class printout and then anonymously distribute it (somehow) to everyone there including the professor. You might also report how you feel unsafe and threatened by the class to the appropriate college departments. Going public with these thoughts would probably be dangerous to your college and personal life.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 08:16 AM
1

Sommers has a youtube channel of sorts so its really easy to see what she is all about. There are also hundreds more videos of her on youtube doing talks or interviews. All you have to do is search her name.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:50 PM
1

Because of "rape culture" which some way, some how as a man you are contributing to. Have you ever whistled at a woman? You contributed to "rape culture" that 'encourages men to rape women'. Have you ever pointed out a hot babe to your fellow guys? Rape culture. Stared too long at a women? Rape culture! Looked at porn? Ever? Rape culture! All of which encourages men to rape women. Basically this all present, all encompassing 'rape culture' which ALL men are part of and responsible for and which …
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:33 AM
1

There is some historical context to go with their actions. They did this back then because the draft didn't exist at that time so they had to make people join the war otherwise. Also women weren't allowed to join the war or the army even if they wanted to then so the most they could do was to convince other people (men) to join the war. Yes it was a shameful way of getting the job done, but it helps to understand the way things were then.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:43 AM
5

Only threaten? In that case /u/girlwriteswhat didn't research quite enough. The Suffragettes ACTUALLY set off dozens of bombs and killed a lot of people as well as using numerous other methods to terrorize everyone into getting their way. Check out this Book Review: The Suffragette Bombers; Britain's Forgotten Terrorists
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:23 AM
2

I thought about posting this also but they I decided this content was better suited for /r/tumblrinaction There was a hilarious gif in the comments though http://i.imgur.com/pQ2VhDn.gifv
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:04 PM
1

You might want to add these two items to your list somewhere. When women run for office, they win as often as men do: "Our study found no difference between success rates for men and women in general elections"[.]() And this study finds insignificant differences in media coverage of candidates due to gender. http://home.gwu.edu/~dwh/nongendered.pdf
/r/MensRights14/03/15 06:34 PM
2

Welcome to Dickwolves round 2. People shouldn't be able to do anything that upsets anyone else ever. The whole world is personally responsible for coddling your feelings.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 06:15 AM
38

Its funny how they are always trying to lower the bar for what is considered abuse such as destroying furniture, withholding sex, and excessive nagging which is fine. The less tolerance for violence in the world the better. But anytime the discussion comes to men being abused they set the bar way up high at "he isn't in the emergency room so what's the problem?"
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:18 AM
1

For fun I found out where people could get this book for themselves. http://www.amazon.com/William-R.-Wishard/e/B001KMI2Y8 http://www.amazon.com/Mens-Rights-A-Handbook-80s/dp/0896660125 http://www.findbookprices.de/isbn/9780896660120 http://www.isbns.gl/isbn/9780896660120
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:15 AM
1

For more fun I found out where people could get this book for themselves. http://www.amazon.com/William-R.-Wishard/e/B001KMI2Y8 http://www.amazon.com/Mens-Rights-A-Handbook-80s/dp/0896660125 http://www.findbookprices.de/isbn/9780896660120 http://www.isbns.gl/isbn/9780896660120
/r/MensRights10/03/15 06:15 AM
4

http://i.imgur.com/I9FCTWx.jpg
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:13 AM
9

I have thought quite a bit about that article and I think it can be explained by two premises: Premise 1: Any dissatisfaction of any kind of any amount for any reason at any time about a sexual experience can ONLY be explained as rape. So you are either absolutely, totally, 100% delighted with every last bit for every single second of your sexual situation or you were raped. Premise 2: All 'rape' is an intentional, deliberate, willful act on the part of the rapist. Since no one would ever consen…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 10:46 PM
1

Fix what?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:18 PM

A wiki by definition is a publicly edited webpage. If its just approved people editing it then its just a webpage.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 12:20 PM

while on acid
/r/MensRights20/02/15 07:36 PM
2

Looking though it I think the whole things is a very long drawn out "I was tricked/coerced into sex therefore its rape after the fact" essay. And they are so detached from reality that they can't imagine any scenario in which the rapist wasn't intentionally raping the victim. This is also why the essay author says Lisa can't take back her consent retroactively. Because the author didn't intentionally trick Lisa into giving consent to be linked to the author doesn't think of herself as doing anyt…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 02:37 AM
3

Oh My! This is hilarious. Did you look at the comments on the linked article? The very first comment is someone linked to in the article retroactively taking back consent to have her material linked to. Then the article author says "Well then, sucks to be you, doesn’t it, Lisa?" while linking to a post showing that Lisa gave consent to be linked to before and so she can't take it back afterwards. Then if you bother to read even further into those discussions (no easy task) then they get talking …
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:57 PM
3

Funny bit of history. "Tone down the lynching" is actually exactly what they tried when all the States were getting around to passing anti-lynching laws. It didn't work though. By that time the racism and terrorizing of black folks had gone too far for too long and society moved towards ending racism.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:54 PM
0

Take a chill pill man.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:26 PM

The guy I first replied to wasn't adding to the conversation. Pointing out the same responses I see a dozen times a day here at least is an attempt to break the circlejerking and get to some real conversation.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:48 PM
4

And when I post there I will remember that. Right now though I am posting in /r/mensrights in case you didn't notice.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:44 PM

The circlejerks get real tiring. I didn't think pointing that out counts as brave.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:31 PM

This is /r/mensrights, its not exactly the place where people get on the 'hes lucky to be banging older babes' bandwagon. The circlejerks get real tiring.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:30 PM

You think downvotes 'prove' right or wrong? This is /r/mensrights, its not exactly the place where people get on the 'hes lucky to be banging older babes' bandwagon.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:19 PM

You have that backwards. No one says that here. What everyone actually says is that they say that everywhere else. edit: hmmm, tough crowd tonight. I'm not wrong though.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:33 PM

I suggest you print out little flyers that explain why you wear a MENINIST shirt. That way when people actually ask you why rather than just insulting you and directing hate at you you are prepared for them. I suggest a list of issues that relate to school problems that men and boys face. more boys are suspended than girls more boys drop out or don't graduate teachers are biased against boys at a young age because boys have a harder time sitting still all day like girls men are a minority of col…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:01 AM
3

I was banned from r/askfeminists over a week after my last post there. Apparently someone was going through weeks old comments and decided "hmmmm, I don't like this guy. BANNED."
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:34 AM
3

but the goal is not to create separate but equal communities, The lies inherent in this. So, if I want to start a coffee shop... then by going out and starting one, this is wrong, I should integrate myself into the existing coffee shops, and become a barista? Morons. If you want to make games MAKE GAMES. "separate but equal communities". The person who wrote that thinks women live in this world and they need affirmative action to fix it. Thats why in her mind spaces need to be made for women in …
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:28 AM

Given what you know now have you ever confronted or just talked about her abusiveness to you mother? I wonder if she ever realized women can be the perpetrators of domestic abuse?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:42 AM
2

I agree that /u/girlwriteswhat needs to work in making her points more concise and sound-bite ready. You don't always have the time to do a full, in-depth historical rundown of each topic. Sometimes you do have time to go in-depth, but not always. I am a great fan of yours /u/girlwriteswhat , but I can see why Mr. Uygur had to keep interrupting you when you just kept going on and on. The other Honey Badgers have to butt in on you during the Honey Badger Radio broadcasts frequently as well. Aside…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:55 PM

Are you going to reply to those facebook comments about how wrong this article is if we help you dissect it?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:32 PM

These basic roles stopped mattering when humans started building cities and civilizations. Its time to break away from your 'humans are primates' way of thinking.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:22 PM
1

Going to need more than some random screenshots to make any judgement on this.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:17 PM
1

How about it /u/firmkillernate ? Are you willing to step up and challenge the violent portrayal of men they are pushing at the meeting?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 01:19 PM
20

ACTION OPPORTUNITY HERE FOLKS. THEY INVITED MEN TO PARTICIPATE SO LETS HELP OP PARTICIPATE THE HELL OUT OF THIS MEETING. I checked his posting history. He seems to be the real deal. Those three lines in yellow are suitably open ended for you and other men in campus to go to town at that meeting. Is there a Men's advocacy group of any sort in your campus? I see you asked that a couple months ago on reddit. EXPLORE THE MYTHS SURROUNDING SEXUAL ASSAULT You can "explore" (debunk) the 1 in 5 myth tha…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 07:25 PM
3

Can you get extra credit for blowing that list to pieces and getting the school to throw that book away?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:37 PM
8

So much bullshit in that list. Being a quarter century old doesn't help either. Here is a crazy idea: the reason men don't notice these "invisible" benefits is because they are making stuff up that isn't real.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:36 PM
2

I like the cut of your jib /u/Matt_Why . You bring interesting conversation around. I googled up a bunch of lists of ways women are 'oppressed' and lists of 'issues' women face in our modern times to find items that a WRA could fight for. Damn its hard to find some good ones. 45% are about women/girls are stereotyped unfairly when most of the time the actual real world doesn't bear out that stereotype. But you know, stereotypes hurt feelings. 50% is them looking solely at the women side of a soc…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 05:37 PM
1

This is a quite impressive wall of text. Did you put the whole things together yourself or did you borrow some bits from other places? However it came about I will add this one to my saved posts. I just wanted to show you a useful tool for analyzing the historical appearance of different terms such as patriarchy. Its the GOOGLE Ngram Viewer.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 01:47 PM

Check my history. You will see I am no feminist. If I see a valid point of discussion I will pursue it.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:03 PM
2

You are using the word 'incompetent' incorrectly. incompetent: not having or showing the necessary skills to do something successfully. RELATIVE physical strength between men and women is not the context of the insult in the video we are talking about. Girls are used as the metric to insult boys because women are less competent likely to play sports relative to men. Women are perfectly capable of throwing or running with skill and expertise when they practice. Mythbusters did a show on this topi…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:00 PM
2

That is not the context of the insult in the video we are talking about. Girls are used as the metric to insult boys because women are less physically capable likely to play sports relative to men. The "Throw Like a Girl" Myth - MythBusters
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:44 PM
2

I never said the word 'easy'. Other people understand what I am saying: The point isn't that the average man is stronger than the average woman. We all know that. It is why we seperately sports and why there is such a problem with MTF transgendered people in sports. "Throwing like a girl" isn't about strength, it is about technique. If you watch the commercial that is fairly obvious. Women are more than capable of learning correct technique.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:45 AM
2

Could a man breastfeed a baby? And I mean actually provide the baby sufficient nutrition? No. No amount of skill would allow a man to breastfeed a baby because of biology. I didn't say skill isn't also a factor, but no amount of "skill" is going to allow a man to feed a baby from breastfeeding. Do you see the difference? Now back to the "like a girl" video. Can a girl run? Are girls physically incapable of running because of biology just like men can't breastfeed because of biology? No. Girls CA…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:49 AM

You aren't making any sense. Your sister was incompetent at breast feeding because her son had a cleft palate? You are missing the point. The point of the "like a girl" commercial isn't about girls being physically weaker than men its about girls being thought of as shamefully lacking at basic physical skills. Skill is not the same thing as biology.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:32 PM
1

Soo not a valid example. Breastfeeding is biology, not skill.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:09 PM
1

This isn't about biological differences in strength. This is about girls being stereotyped at being incompetent at various physical activities. You can't change biology but you can change competence at whatever level of strength they have.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:22 PM
2

You can also try /r/legaladvice because I don't know enough about this topic.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:08 AM
6

She knows. Check out this video. This video which was filmed over a month before the kickstarter was started shows she was well accustomed to typical internet threats before her fame really kicked into high gear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fyF3xWz8vA
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:41 AM
8

"Women have a right to not feel AKWARD." ---- Skepchick Also could you go a little more in depth in how feminist research and theory are made? What are its flaws and faults compared to other, more grounded research? I would like to see a formerly insider's perspective on these if you don't mind.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 06:48 PM
1

Its hard to prove rape in a court of law but its easy to prove rape in a court of public opinion thus they build up the fear and hysteria. Eventually you can change the laws to match the hysteria.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:55 AM
1

Going to have to disagree with you today. There is another very simple explanation that makes sense: Its quite difficult to get convictions on charges of rape. Most non-violent rapes end up as unprovable either way hesaid/shesaid situations. Filing a report doesn't help any if it won't result in a conviction so instead they focus on driving up rape hysteria and panic.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:52 AM

Their They're (they are) collectively digging so for down a rhetorical philosophical rabbit hole that their they're (they are) divorced from the reality of 90% of the population..
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:35 AM
1

I didn't come here. I have allready been here in /r/MensRights for a couple years. I haven't said other things would be MORE effective either. I am not trying to trick or deceive you into abandoning men's rights. The only thing I am trying to accomplish here is to have a conversation about the interconnectedness of things. You are looking for a fight that I was never trying to have in the first place.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 03:59 AM
1

There is a whole side of this conversation you are having by yourself and without me, dude. There are no veils here. There is no subterfuge here. When you make the world better everyone benefits. For example if a vaccine for AIDS was discovered we wouldn't need to go over and demand they create a "AIDS vaccination for Men and Boys campaign". Just vaccinate everyone and call it a day.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:09 PM
1

There is no link anywhere. You didn't link to the article.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:53 PM
3

I tried telling another guy the exact same thing a couple months ago. They just can't conceive women not being oppressed.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 07:31 AM
1

I didn't say they HAD to be dealt with together, though it is a possibility. I was pointing out that so many things are interconnected and because of that if we could ALSO, not instead of, fix some other problems and help men by doing it. For example I am a proponent of Universal Basic Income. If we had UBI then single parents would be far less desperate and less dependent on the child support system. This would help a great deal of men being screwed over by the system and take away a lot of the…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:18 AM
1

I didn't say we should take the focus away from men at all. I was pointing out that so many things are interconnected and because of that if we could ALSO, not instead of, fix some other problems and help men by doing it. For example I am a proponent of Universal Basic Income. If we had UBI then single parents would be far less desperate and less dependent on the child support system. This would help a great deal of men being screwed over by the system and take away a lot of the support it has m…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:01 AM
1

My list is longer than the one OP linked to. If we are going to be talking about a subject then we should link all our resources together to make the best list possible.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:33 AM
1

So I should read more so I can try out their idea which didn't work? Or how about you tell me how you think my post indicates the Progressive Stack approach because I don't see it. Would ending the war on drug NOT also end the discrimination it causes towards all the black men it puts in jail? Because we know that men are discriminated against in our court system. Or we can go about it the opposite direction and end the way the court system discriminates against men. The other fastest way to end…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:03 PM
1

I find him far too long winded and his talks go too abstract and philosophical. It is too difficult to make real world applications with them. Aside from that I am not going to make any judgements on how they hold up to debate or scrutiny.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:31 AM

They coppied my idea: Lets compile a list of all the 'male' offences out there: mansplaining, manspreading, manslaming, male gaze, etc. (self.MensRights) submitted 12 days ago * http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2sgcmv/lets_compile_a_list_of_all_the_male_offences_out/
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:21 AM
0

There was an interesting analysis about her kickstarter a few months ago that I saved. It explains whey she abandoned ever finishing the kickstarter in the first place and had to move on to other projects. Also because she is just going after the money. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2bct3k/tropes_vs_reality_ff_lists_all_the_games_they_can/cj4tn7f?context=3 Sarkeesian has totally fucked herself with her kickstarter. I mean, she made a ton of money, so that's great for her, but I'm su…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:16 AM
1

If your girlfriend hates it as well then see if she would like to make the addition to the board herself. Not trying to force her into anything, but it would be nice to see how far she is willing to go against this board. Doesn't need to make a public event out of it. She could sneak an extra page on the board in the middle of the night or something.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 09:18 AM
1

The gay question has been asked in /r/mensrights many times before. If you wanted that answered all you had to do was search. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=gay&restrict_sr=on Black issues come up often enough as well. If you wanted that answered all you had to do was search. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=black&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2tnrxs/2015_the_year_black_women_declared_war_on_black/ If you have anything more s…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 04:02 AM

fixing mens problems will fix many of the ones you refer to It sure will. I definitely agree with that. the Progressive Stack approach to issues I don't know what that is. the victim pyramid Not sure what that one is either.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:17 AM
2

You are correct. There are a great deal of cross related social problems. The "war on drugs", about which President Nixon who created this war said "its really all about the blacks" has done incredible amounts of damage to black families and resulted is so very many fatherless children and households. The destruction of workers unions and the extreme wealth inequality in this country and the stagnation of wages for 40 years has resulted in so many 2-income houses. This takes time away from child…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:48 AM

I think you posted in the wrong thread.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:00 AM
1

Any stories you would like to share about the difference in your experiences since the transition?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 12:44 AM
6

"legally presumed" means every married man in the state of Michigan. No it doesn't and no one thinks that. Only you are reading it that way. Even anti-MRAs wouldn't believe we think something so impossible. "MRAs think 80% of children men are raising aren't biologically theirs" will be said by no on ever. You haven't proven me wrong about anything. You are throwing a fit over a title.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 12:27 AM

You are being overly pedantic. Anyone can just follow the link and see the highlighted texts.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 11:42 PM

The title says legally presumed, which I personally take to mean presumed by someone other than the man/father. OP could have said "default court judgements of paternity when the father didn't make the claim himself", but that would be a hell of a mouthful for a title. Its been mentioned often that the overall percentage of men raising children that aren't biologically theirs is only 1 or 2%
/r/MensRights24/01/15 11:03 PM
0

The statistics aren't as bad as you indicate. The paper is only referring to default court judgements of paternity which mostly applies to unwed mothers with no father's name on the birth certificate. Its not a statistic for fathers in general.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 10:46 PM
16

This has been posted before, but its nice to have a reminder once in a while. The reason you didn't find it when you posted it is because you copied the address bar instead of clicking on the "share" button underneath the video to get the default address. Not complaining, just FYI. If you reddit-search the 'share' yahoo address you get the other submissions. Unfortunately reading the other submissions led me to this: Texas Judge Strips Son From Father Over Manipulative Mother’s Claims So in the …
/r/MensRights24/01/15 09:04 PM
1

They were wrong about the hand sanitizer causing super germs. Most hand sanitizers are just alcohol which doesn't breed germ resistance. So public transportation would have worked as an option.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 08:57 PM
2

Awesome. Or should I say Mansome article? I will add these satirically to my list. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2sgcmv/lets_compile_a_list_of_all_the_male_offences_out/
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:20 AM
2

Built in auto-encryption that requires the patient's password to decrypt. Or something. I haven't drawn out a full gameplan for the idea.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 11:02 AM
2

You usually still see your own posts and your own submissions if you are viewing them from your account history even after they are deleted. To see if stuff is deleted or shadowbanned you need to create an alternate account you can log into to see you as other reddit accounts see you. Reddit doesn't alert you in any way if you are being shadowbanned.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 08:46 AM
1

Wearable cameras that record audio and video 24/7 whenever you are working. Such as these http://getnarrative.com/
/r/MensRights20/01/15 08:10 AM
2

But we have no way of knowing he is still monitoring that or what his current situation is at all. Lets hear from him before we start putting up money.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 02:18 AM
1

Oh my goddess, that's hilarious!
/r/MensRights18/01/15 05:29 AM
1

My brother had a good laugh at my answer as well.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 04:47 AM
3

A full DNA analysis cost a couple thousand dollars, but a simple paternity yes/no is easy and only costs a couple hundred at most.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 04:39 AM
3

Now there is a law that we could make it our mission to get passed. We make it MANDATORY to put a father's name on the birth certificate if he can prove he is the father.
/r/MensRights18/01/15 04:26 AM
4

Sorry about the other posters /u/Satafly . Unfortunately most of the time its the angrier, more extreme people that do most of the posting here in /r/MensRights . The more moderate mostly just sit out these things. I agree with you that something like an IFF day would be good here. IFF meaning Identify (the) Friendly Feminist day. Most casual feminists also think feminism is just about equality because they aren't involved in the actual politics or activism that does so many bad things. It would…
/r/MensRights18/01/15 04:13 AM
1

All you have to do is follow the Kickstarter link to see everything she promised. And then go to the youtube page to see everything she has actually delivered on: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn4ob_5_ttEaA_vc8F3fjzE62esf9yP61 So far she has delivered 7 videos in 2 1/2 years covering only 3 topics in total. Here I will copypasta some for you from the kickstarter page: THE PROJECT With your help, I’ll produce a 5-video series (now expanded to 12 videos) entitled Tropes vs Women in Video …
/r/MensRights17/01/15 04:31 AM
1

She has created more than 2 videos in total but some of those videos are the same topic more than once. She delivered the first video over a year past the promised delivery date despite receiving over $150,000 more than she asked for. Now TWO AND A HALF years in and she has barely delivered half of the original NON-stretch, $6000 targets she promised. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/566429325/tropes-vs-women-in-video-games She promised well researched, in depth, feminist analysis on women i…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:01 PM
3

Yeah. I get that. I also sometimes just lurk around without saying anything. I think they came up with 'patriarchy theory' because it was easier than fighting specific problems. When you solve a specific problem then you have to find another and that takes effort. With 'patriarchy' as the enemy its everywhere, everywhen, everything and unbeatable so they have an infinite number of grievances to demand concessions for. I too want equality for everyone, but when one side can perpetually demand an …
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:37 AM
1

There is always /r/legaladvice for these kind of questions as well.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:19 AM
2

What brings you around here? I did a quick look at your history and see you don't usually come around these parts.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:17 AM
2

Would 'peter pan syndrome' count as a male offence? Maybe. I'll add it to the list.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 05:57 AM
2

I'll fix those, thanks.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 05:56 AM
1

To add to your point 2, Circumcision came up in discussion with my little brother once. He was a teenager at the time. He mentioned that circumcision has been found to reduce HPV rates by 2 or 3%. True enough, its could very well be an actual benefit. My answer to that was, "Do you know what you call a 2% effective medicine? A placebo." By which I meant that 2 or 3% is not a big enough effect to base medical standards on.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:34 PM
1

I agree Funcuz. Everyone here is acting like some SJWs looking for something to be offended about. Fred Nile, the guy being interviewed, tried to say the situation was perfectly normal given a life and death situation, but they kept pressuring him to expand on it so he threw out the default, traditional bravery stuff.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:21 PM
2

I'll add that one to my list: "Lets compile a list of all the 'male' offences out there: mansplaining, manspreading, manslaming, male gaze, etc."
/r/MensRights15/01/15 02:52 PM
1

Yeah. The article goes out of its way to bash Dunham and bring up controversy. MAYBE her show just isn't very entertaining.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 04:33 AM
2

Thanks, I'll add that one to the list.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:47 AM
2

I didn't think it is. I just want to compile all the 'man themed' social offences real or made up that are going on out there. I want to see how many different ways men are being labeled the problem in society.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 03:47 AM
3

Its when men look/stare at women with sexual intent or if they just don't like it. Its extra bad because men have such power and control over women thanks to the patriarchytm. I could go on, but nah. Its easy enough to google it if you want more.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:34 AM
2

damn, how did I forget toxic masculinity?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:25 PM
1

dammit bot. You are a real asshole at times.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:24 PM
3

Exactly right. Check this out http://np.reddit.com/search?q=if+you+could+commit+any+crime and this http://np.reddit.com/search?q=crime+without+punishment&restrict_sr=off&sort=relevance&t=all The question of "if you could commit crime without punishment" has been asked HUNDREDS of times on reddit alone and every time its predictably rape, murder, theft, and kidnapping everywhere. Hell! There have been 2 movies released in the past 2 years on this exact question. The Purge 2013 The Purge: Anarchy …
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:24 PM
2

I said something similar a day ago. This post's title is a little better though in my opinion.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 10:26 AM
1

Its not about the title you apply to yourself its about what you want to do about the situations that pop up. Basically lie to them and call yourself a feminist while bringing up issues affecting men. "As a feminist for EQUALITY men need more suicide prevention help." "As a feminist for EQUALITY men should have equal custody of children by default." etc. If they have a problem with you wanting to help men then you can question them about their being feminists. "Don't you want equality? Its the p…
/r/MensRights09/01/15 06:33 AM
1

I have been here for a couple years. I know all this stuff. I don't need a PhD thesis. The post title is just begging to misinterpreted. How about OP deletes it and comes up with a new title like, "Paris killers targeted men, spared women. Female privilege in action?"
/r/MensRights09/01/15 06:10 AM
1

Thanks for the thesis. This is still not a good discussion to have here now.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 05:34 AM
4

Its interesting, but do we really want people to say, "MRAs want more women to be killed by terrorists"? We could do better discussing other topics. You might not like my opinion here, but I would delete this submission.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:25 AM
3

Be glad you don't live in Spain. They have "gender violence" laws in effect and approved as constitutional by their courts. Their laws specifically state that when a man commits any act of violence towards a woman its a special, separate kind of crime worse than any other kind of crime. Apparently all a woman has to do is point at a man and say, "he 'gender violenced' me!" He is automatically arrested and jailed until the situation can be investigated and she is instantly granted housing, money,…
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:55 PM
1

Damn. I always come too late to see the spammers posts. I would have like to have a laugh.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 06:44 AM
1

This video might be what you are looking for. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRzrT0H-T-4 Christina Hoff Sommers goes into the history of different feminist groups that are far more like your views than the radicals we see around today.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 11:10 AM
1

Another book I have hear is good at explaining the situation you are in is TOXIC PARENTS. If you and your wife read it it may help you to see the situation more clearly. There are dozens of websites as well giving suggestions for toxic parent syndrome.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:49 AM
1

Yep, same old talking points rearranged a little. 'Feminism has a definition for everything. If you disagree with feminism its because you don't really understand us. We have books and researchers and we have infiltrated institutions so we must be right.'
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:41 PM
3

Indeed. LOTS of women get attacked with acid. Its really easy to find them with a simple google search.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 08:18 PM
1

http://np.reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.usatoday.com%2Fstory%2Fopinion%2F2014%2F12%2F14%2Fcampus-rape-uva-crisis-rolling-stone-politics-column%2F20397277%2F
/r/MensRights29/12/14 09:14 AM
2

And then lets consider the accuser's 'evidence'. The police are just going to hear one person's side of the story. Its very easy to take someone's words or actions out of context. Is the accuser going to present 15 minutes of yelling recorded over the course of a month? Or two months? What if the accuser is just as violent, abusive, or coercive as the perp? Around half of abusive relationships are reciprocally violent. As I said earlier, it sounds nice, but its extremely impractical realisticall…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 08:29 AM
6

Nothing will get this law repealed faster than a dozen or two cases brought against women for “coercive control” abuse. Remember how fast they abandoned 'primary aggressor' policies when it put women in jail?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:58 AM
2

While I agree with you that it SOUNDS like a good idea how can it be implemented justly or practically? How can you collect evidence for it? There is no physical evidence in these proposed crimes. How can you reasonably prove “a complex pattern of abuse using power and psychological control over another — financial control, verbal abuse, forced social isolation. These incidents may vary in seriousness and may be repeated over time.” Without setting up a complete surveillance network in someone's…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:54 AM
0

I'll explain the logic. You can't give help to dead people and since most of those suicide survivors are women they need the help the most. Really sucky logic, but there you go.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:27 AM
2

Did you ever find out what you were accused of doing?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:29 AM
16

'Islam isn't to blame but all men are' http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2pmh14/sydney_seige_new_article_islam_isnt_to_blame_but/ http://www.dailylife.com.au/news-and-views/dl-opinion/sydney-siege-man-haron-monis-history-of-violence-against-women-was-a-warning-sign-no-one-took-seriously-20141216-128g8e.html
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:52 AM
38

What is the world coming to when a Muslim man of middle-eastern decent can't tell if it was SJW's or Stormfont that are trying to force him 'back to his own country' for spreading an opinion in a peaceful manner.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:43 AM
7

This reminds me of that high-school girl who graffitied her own car and sent herself death threats in order to get sympathy.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 05:51 PM
2

Nice video. Short and to the point.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 10:05 AM
1

People always downvote me when I do that too.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:55 AM
3

Your assumption is that the only way we can equalize men and women is to burn the whole system of support and government down Tea Party style. How about we fix things instead of just going nuclear anytime something is not as equal as we would like.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:51 AM
6

There are always a few who will try to see the bigger picture. Here is a socialist analysis of 'Patriarchy Theory' and the complete rejection of the idea of a Patriarchy published back in 1981.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 09:38 AM
9

What if they have some of the guys sign a certificate that says, "I (write name here) identify as a FEMALE person" and then they just hang that on their office wall? What are the legal requirements to be identified as a woman in Germany?
/r/MensRights27/11/14 03:20 AM
1

I didn't re-write that poem, you did.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:34 PM
1

You are comparing the horrible deaths of millions of Jews to the hi-jinks feminists have been up to. Here, have a downvote.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:43 AM
1

Yes I understand what your point was. Clearly you don't agree with the analogy and neither do I. I was explaining the original point the analogy was making.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:40 AM
1

The crack dealer does benefit from a crack culture because people pay him money. That is why 'drug dealer' = 'man' in that analogy.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:10 AM
2

http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2n1uan/pointing_that_men_suffer_discrimation_too_is/cm9nmhr
/r/MensRights22/11/14 04:30 PM
2

You left out the part where they arrest HIM for being stabbed because of the Duluth model policing.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 09:09 AM
8

It is something I read somewhere a while ago. It is not my argument and I don't agree with it.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 06:14 AM
-4

When a crack dealer occasionally gets attacked by a crazed junkie having withdraws do we think of him as a victim of drug abuse or do we think its his fault for being a drug dealer in the first place? Now replace 'drug dealer' with 'man' and replace 'a crazed junkie' with 'the patriarchy' and you have the explanation how suffering happens to men in the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 06:01 AM
0

I suggest watching all the speeches from the First International Conference on Men’s Issues back in June and follow their suggestions on activism. You could also ask the major leaders of the MRAs for ideas. Warren Farrell, Erin Pizzey who recently took charge of the White Ribbon website, or Christina Hoff Sommers - the factual feminist.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 08:02 AM
1

OP, you sound like you wanted to make a political statement more than you actually wanted a date. That sounds like a bad reason for a date. I'm sure it helps you screen out bed dates really fast though. I suggest next time you say before the date begins, "lets go Dutch."
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:55 AM
3

I posted this yesterday you karma stealer. ;) http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2mogxy/crosspost_drunk_girl_in_public_speaks_out_says/
/r/MensRights19/11/14 11:53 PM
1

Direct link to the video.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:08 PM
1

It is all in his book, with the same name, that the movie is based on that was written by him. The movie was made into a heroic Dad story but the actual book is much much less self glorifying. http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/311143702749?lpid=82 eh?
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:09 AM
2

I absolutely believe he feels bad now He had no reason to feel bad about anything. He had nothing to apologize for. How about a little freedom of expression and artistic appreciation of the human form? If he had a shirt covered with kittens would be cause for people to complain about animal cruelty and animal objectification?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 08:25 AM
1

Your argument does stand but I am going to disagree with your argument. I think that the complaints about the shirt being all about 'objectifying' women are a load of crap. How about a little freedom of expression and artistic appreciation of the human form? If he had a shirt covered with kittens would people be complaining about animal cruelty and animal welfare? If he had a shirt covered with WWF wrestlers would people be making a giant stink about glorification of violence, etc.? If he had a …
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:47 AM
3

I also think that the complaints about the shirt being all about 'objectifying' women are a load of horse shit shirt. How about a little freedom of expression and artistic appreciation of the human form? If he had a shirt covered with kittens would people be complaining about animal cruelty and animal welfare? If he had a shirt covered with WWF wrestlers would people be making a giant stink about glorification of violence, etc.? If he had a videogame T-shirt would that be enough to bring our the…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:30 AM
3

Greetings fellow MRA communist/socialist. Your user history is an refreshing read. What do you think of this post of mine from a couple months ago?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 09:51 AM
2

So if I support single-payer healthcare (a leftist idea) I must also be a damned 'feminist liberal'? I don't think so. Third wave feminists adopted the 'feminism is a Marxist class struggle' rhetoric to get a broad base of support they didn't have any real connection. Its just like modern rightist have tied the idea of pollution, environmental protection, and global warming to 'liberal lies to control our lives'. Environmental concerns shouldn't be left or right issue. Sex inequalities in our so…
/r/MensRights15/11/14 09:46 AM
7

No one is naked on that shirt.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:33 AM
2

Get the people she attacked to sue her for assault and get a restraining order against her so she can't get anywhere near your bar anymore. For starters.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:15 PM
1

I would have to know more about the situation to say. I'v had plenty of embarrassing pictures taken of me when I was passed out drunk.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:49 AM
2

Anyone who passes out drunk with a group of friends/people is fair game for embarrassing pictures and sharpie-to-the-face pranks in my book. The key is stopping at harmless but embarrassing pranks and not going farther.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:17 AM
1

You could also try linking up donations to MOVEMBER http://us.movember.com/
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:55 PM
0

"MO" is the Australian short slang for mustache because, well, Australians. Most non-Australians don't know this so it has to be explained as No Shave November. I agree that its nice to have a month specifically for men's health so we need to do a better job explaining it to people. Maybe we could explain it as "Mustache November, Movember!" http://us.movember.com/
/r/MensRights10/11/14 11:26 AM
1

Yes, SOME humans are dangerous, while ALL wild predatory animals are dangerous.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:50 PM
1

I know what you are intending to imply, but bears are wild, predatory animals. If you must use an animal in your example then how about domesticated dogs? Its reasonable to expect a dog allowed to roam around in public to be safe to approach, otherwise you would expect it to be muzzled or in a cage somewhere.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:27 AM
12

That implies that men are bears which is something you should always be wary of because bears are wild, predatory animals. How about this instead: "We shouldn't be taught to be wary of potholes or unexpected road obstructions when driving, roads should be perfectly safe to drive on all the time!"
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:05 AM
1

RemindMe! 4 days The NP bot better damned not delete remindmebot's comment for not being a NP link.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:31 AM
4

Any examination of the women who are in U.S. prisons reveals that the majority are nonviolent offenders with poor education, little employment experience and multiple histories of abuse from childhood through adulthood. The majority of men are also in jail because of non-violent offences. Thankyou "WAR ON DRUGS". There are allready a couple dozen comments on this article, but dammit they are going to get another for this omission and several other omissions.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:16 AM
10

Oh, nagging IS abuse. But only when a man does it to a woman of course. They even came up with a clever name for it "coercive control". And some people want to add this to the list of pardonable reasons to kill your male significant other. This video covers the whole concept rather thoroughly: "When She Kills You", by youtuber: johntheother.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:26 AM
3

Thats exactly what they have been doing for years and they haven't been voted out yet.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:54 PM
2

I'm talking about the people they put in office not the people who put them there. Those in office are going to be making the policies not the mostly poor people who elected them.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:39 PM
2

The republican people elected and the policies they will push are going to bring about one dollar one vote.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:02 PM
2

So pretty much the ultimate republican goal is 'one dollar, one vote' rather than the 'one person, one vote' system we have now.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 07:21 PM
1

You can be banned for ANY reason. There aren't any rules.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:47 AM
1

I was banned from /r/askfeminists . Not sure why. I think its because it is "ask feminists" and not "debate with feminists".
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:41 PM
10

Excellent question. It would do us a lot of good to have a list of feminists we could point to and call our ideological allies. Christina Hoff Sommers has a couple books out and she is known as the Factual Feminist
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:31 PM
1

I am about half way through the book now. She doesn't really come off as a feminist. She is an investigative journalist telling about her personal experiences. Good book though.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:15 PM
4

Most people don't have the negative reaction to 'man up' that we do here. I don't think they were trying to offend.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:12 PM
28

How about we just ignore 2XC. It went to crap ever since it went frontpage default. Its just your average cesspool of the internet now. So what if random people on reddit said mean things? I don't care.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 06:28 AM
25

And its GONE.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:30 PM
1

So we repost TIL it sticks? That sounds good to me.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:31 AM
19

Sounds like we need to repost it in a way that it doesn't get deleted. What essential info did the mods think was omitted?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 04:22 AM
1

This what I was trying to say last night. http://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2k9uem/action_opportunity_lets_use_the_marysville_school/ We need to have responses prepared for when people start trying to call yesterdays school shooter 'another MRA'.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:57 AM
1

This is the kind of articles people should be writing about this school shooter http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2014/10/25/Enemy_Is_Neglect_Of_Mental_Ilness/
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:10 PM
1

Most things I have seen written about Elliott Rodger call him a MRA and the public believes it. So lets just sit back and wait this out and in a week or two everyone will believe this shooter is a MRA also. That should work out well.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:54 PM
0

It pisses me off when feminists call Elliott Rodger a MRA. And they will call this shooter an MRA. And the next one and the one after that. And people will believe them. Meanwhile we just sit here and complain about what Sarkeesian says about him. We lose ground by doing nothing. This event sounds like a cry for help. edit: it would be better if people had articles like this to read about him http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2014/10/25/Enemy_Is_Neglect_Of_Mental_Ilness/ rather than only having Sarkeesi…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:47 PM
1

Not a mascot. A cry for help. 'Our students need more counseling more support' kind of thing. edit: I would like to see people write articles like this about this school shooter: http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2014/10/25/Enemy_Is_Neglect_Of_Mental_Ilness/
/r/MensRights25/10/14 04:40 PM
9

I broke out of my shell eventually.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:18 AM
15

it was easy enough to google it. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/italian-nurse-under-investigation-for-killing-up-to-38-patients-because-she-found-them-annoying-9793181.html
/r/MensRights25/10/14 07:36 AM
1

There are dozens of questions I asked. Pick a couple.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 07:38 AM
1

There are plenty of questions you haven't answered yet. You still haven't answered the bra question. Feminists still pull fire alarms and other radical things like lie about rape threats to inspire rallies so why not burn bras?
/r/MensRights23/10/14 04:50 PM
1

Pretend like you are asking yourself all the questions you would ask me and then answer all of those questions. Should only be 300 or 400 questions to answer.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 07:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter