TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ManWithTwoShadows Archive

View 10 posts and 100 comments by ManWithTwoShadows on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Upvoted and archived.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 10:43 AM
9

I push back aggressively whenever I see shit like that. And I've argued with three different women in the main autism sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 02:33 AM
21

That's called a "fallacy of relative privation", BTW.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 10:11 PM
13

I wonder if there are any self-defense instructors who reacted to Hasan's advice of "rolling into a ball". XD
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 07:45 PM
36

I watched my first Hasan video years ago, and I got immediate bad vibes from him. I couldn't explain why (and still can't), but something just felt "off" about the guy. Then, the incident with his dog came to light, and now this. Sometimes, you just have to trust your gut.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 06:34 PM
7

Your schoolmate is a dishonest idiot. Let's go over the reasons. "... but it is most certainly a truth that feminists who advocate for misandry are by definition not feminists." That's a lie. The dictionary definition of feminism doesn't exclude misandrists. If someone hates men, but they believe in and advocate for gender equality, then that fits the textbook definition of feminism. "Similarly, if someone calls themselves a feminist and advocates for the systematic hatred and subjugation of men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 01:54 PM
8

There are a few other comments in that thread calling out the top comment. Those give me hope. "Crazy ironic comment, given the video is about men abandoning other men. Be more Aragorn." (87 likes) "U missed the point of the video" "This is clearly a comment by someone who didn't stick around to the conclusion" (18 likes) "Jesus Christ, some of these comments are tragic."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 05:57 PM
13

Did I make any excuses for her? You sure did! In your top comment, you said, "I don't know how anyone could view it as malicious." By declaring her obviously-malicious actions to be non-malicious, you're already making excuses for her. LOL LMAO I'm gonna post a receipt in case you edit your top comment: https://imgur.com/a/stupid-comment-from-stupid-redditor-Rm10dHt
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 03:42 PM
16

... I don't know how anyone could view it as malicious. Maybe 'cause she went into his house and recorded him, both without permission? LOL WTF
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 03:31 PM
1

I didn't say that it was. I didn't say that you said it was. That you are strawmanning the prior interaction reflects poorly. I didn't "strawman" anything. I pointed out the fact that your reply doesn't debunk mine. You seem very invested in going "Nuh-uh". You seem very invested in making comments that look like counter-arguments while insisting they're not. That's because the point wasn't to debunk you, I agree that the premise of the main post needs to be modified in the light of this info (t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 02:17 AM
0

Nothing you said debunks anything I said. That is direct confirmation that they initially tried to make it exclusionary. Correct. Still doesn't debunk anything I said. ... but nowhere is this sexist behavior being pointed out as negative. That doesn't debunk anything I said. Further, while this isn't a hard/enforced exclusion, if they really do label it as a "designated space" then there is going to be ample amounts of soft/social exclusion going on. The simple threat of social consequences in o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 11:09 PM
6

No problem! Thanks for being nice in your response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 08:44 AM
10

Sorry, but the post is misleading. I appreciate your male advocacy, but the gym in question is not excluding men at any hour, ever. I can prove my claim using one primary source and two secondary sources. First, let's take a look at the primary source: the official website of the Lyon Center, which contains the Robinson Room. If you scroll down to the Robinson Room and click on it, you'll see nothing about men / boys being excluded. Even if you go to their hours of operation, it says nothing abo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 07:55 AM
2

Love the second picture. Ali's toughest fight wasn't against Foreman, Frazier, or Norton. It was against the US government.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 12:04 PM
4

And you have no proof that the opposite is generally true. I don't have to. The burden of proof isn't mine (in this case). It's your responsibility to prove your own claims; it's not anyone else's responsibility to disprove your claims. And if a guy is that apprehensive to paying for a first date: Then dont. He’s clearly not interested in the majority of women. Because the majority expects him to pay. Irrelevant. A man can still be interested in most women but not in paying for a first date, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 02:49 PM
4

Citation needed. Actually paying attention to women and actually getting to know women. Anecdotal evidence is weak evidence. What does this have to do with what I wrote? Did you read the entire paragraph? You wrote, "And if a guy is that apprehensive to paying for a first date: Then dont. He’s clearly not interested in the majority of women." That makes absolutely no sense. A guy can be interested in most women and not be interested in paying for the first date. A guy can also be interested in p…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 02:30 PM
2

There is no actual way to avoid criticism, anyone is free to criticize whatever they like. That doesn't mean the target of their criticism will or is required to care or accept it as valid, much less change based on whatever the criticism is. That depends on a case-by-case basis. If a feminist employee does crappy work, and her male boss criticizes her, she's "required" to change based on his criticism (or get fired). Which is ultimately what your "feminists are avoiding accountability" conclusi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 07:24 AM
8

Likewise, if a woman is picky and slow about sex, she’s gonna be that way with every guy. If youre looking for a woman that has a lower barrier for entry in terms of sex, she’ll be that easy with most guys. Rarely is a guy going to get a sexually reserved woman suddenly begging for his dick unless he is that exceptional. Citation needed. And if a guy is that apprehensive to paying for a first date: Then dont. He’s clearly not interested in the majority of women. You're conflating two different t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 06:13 AM
1

Mens fashion is dull, drab and quite uniform compared to women's clothing. Here's my chance to tell people about Beau Brummel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/26 01:35 PM
2

An easy way to get around her "arguments" is by saying, "We can make an exception for people with children or other dependents." (I don't think conscription should even exist, but if it has to, that's how you argue against gender discrimination.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/25 08:53 PM
3

You did very well! But one of your comments got removed by the automod, and I had to use Old Reddit to see it. I suggest changing a few words and reposting. If that fails, you can message the mods to ask them to approve your comment. This may surprise you, but that usually works for me, even though I go there only to argue against feminists. I don't know if you're intentionally ignoring this person, but they did reply to you here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 01:41 PM
6

That didn’t happen, and if it did, it wasn’t a big deal, and if it was, it’s your own fault. There's a tactic that I call "anchoring the goalposts". When your opponent tries to move the goalposts, you keep it where it is. Point out, as clearly as you can, that your opponent has conceded the original issue of debate. If they keep trying to move the goalposts, keep stating that they've conceded the original issue of debate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 05:54 AM
5

I watched Dr Ana's video about adults who go no-contact with their parents, and I had trouble staying engaged even though I'm interested in the topic. I think she rambles too much. In the video I linked, she could've eliminated about 35% of her words, and the video would've still had the same message.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 12:01 AM
28

Check out this trope: The Unfair Sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/25 11:22 AM
-6

That is despicable You mean my comment? Oh well, whine about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/25 03:09 PM
-7

A woman in ehr last moments of her long happy life really thought about some pretty boytoy effed when she was 19 instead of her loyal husband or kids. Perfectly justifiable. Jack was with her before her husband, and their relationship ended involuntarily. Therefore, she's not wrong to be more loyal to Jack. She clearly believes in "first come, first served", and that's A-okay. I don't care how long she's been with her husband or how many kids she's had with him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/25 01:41 PM
1

Three people have responded to that article. The last two are critical of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/25 11:54 AM
3

Yeah, but I also notice Reddit admins removing misandrist comments more often. Within the past six weeks (more or less), I've reported two anti-male comments for hate spech, and both have been removed. In one case, the commenter even got a site-wide ban. In the past, those reports would usually be ignored.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 03:21 AM
1

And if the person were a child, the adult their parent, and they were failing their classes? It would still be wrong. The athlete in question is allowed to set their own boundaries with their coach. And if their coach destroys their computer, that's a violation of boundaries. If they trust the coach enough to give them that kind of power, and trust them that if they exercise it in that way it's to achieve a purpose the athlete wants more than anything else (getting better at their sport), then t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 08:29 PM
2

You could And I do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 03:49 AM
5

You could consider it family abuse instead of just coach abuse. Why not both?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 03:27 AM
8

I wouldn't call breaking the computer abuse. I would. A person's property belongs to them, and them alone. If someone else destroys a person's property, that means they've violated the person's boundaries and openly disrespected the person. If one party in a relationship tramples on another party's boundaries and openly disrespects them, the relationship is abusive. Also of note is that he is not just coach, but his Uncle too I'm not sure how that's relevant to the topic of the post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 01:32 AM
3

Even in the Democrats and Politics subs, I'm seeing some good responses to this article. The anti-male people are getting destroyed in debates by more sensible lefties. 👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 11:39 AM
8

Interesting how 2 and 5 are the only popular options.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 07:46 AM
9

it is not best to treat all accusers as liars. That's why I said potential liar, as in someone who could be lying. Being skeptical when lacking evidence is the logical thing to do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/25 01:46 AM
5

To be clear I don't think we should do this at all.. Why not? To treat someone as a potential liar, which is what I said, is perfectly reasonable until more evidence comes out. It doesn't mean you assume they're lying; it means you know they could be lying, so you're staying skeptical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/03/25 01:44 AM
12

I would use the "bowl of Skittles" argument when talking about false rape accusations. Only a few women are proven to have lied about rape, but we don't know which woman is honest and which one is dishonest, so it's best to treat all accusers as potential liars. (That doesn't mean their claims shouldn't be taken seriously.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/25 08:16 PM
2

Was looking for this!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 08:40 AM
1

Looks like I made the right decision not to join, then. When I was a kid, my uncle kept pitching the Boy Scouts to me, but I always got a bad vibe from the way he described them. He said I would have to live away from my family and be under the authority of complete strangers, and I would have to wear a fucking uniform. *shudders* I only learned about the controversial stuff as an adult, but I'm glad I listened to my gut as a kid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/25 06:04 AM
15

Just remember that the burden of proof is on the person accusing others of having a guilty conscience. ;) You have the right to mock and laugh at anyone who makes accusations against you without evidence. Make them feel dumb.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 08:40 PM
21

Alternatively, your objections will be hand-waved away because they're much less important than the issue they've raised. Ah, the fallacy of relative privation. "X is less important than Y. Therefore, we should only talk about Y." I would always respond by saying we can talk about both. If they say they're done talking about my issue, I'll say, "I'll keep talking about it anyway."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 08:36 PM
22

It's a gaslighting tactic to make the objector look selfish for objecting to stereotypes. Personally, I would respond by saying, "You're making it sound like it's about me, so I'm gonna respond to you as if you were talking about me."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 08:32 PM
1

Sonic the Hedgehog 3, as confirmed by OP in other comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/25 02:16 AM
4

The following modern interpretation is an example that comes from a philosophy book written in 1987, the one I put in bold are the ones that I think were violated by the guidelines: The part after that is empty. It looks like:
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/25 07:50 AM
11

That was also the movie OP was talking about. Confirmed in the comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/24 07:37 AM
2

No, not Tom and Maddie! They were so cute together in the first two movies. 😭
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/24 07:37 AM
2

Ouch. Sorry to hear that. Are you in a happier place now?
/r/MenSupportMen16/12/24 12:45 AM
1

I'm glad your story had a happy ending! The curent wife sounds like a keeper.
/r/MenSupportMen14/12/24 11:39 AM
2

Huzzah!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/24 01:17 AM
3

Where I grew up and live, it is a cultural norm for husbands to hand all their income to their wives. The wives then gave their husbands little allowance and kept the rest of their income. Let me guess: Japan?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/24 02:52 AM
9

That kind of racism is insidious because it's disguised as empathy for victims. Anyone who calls it out can be labeled as an enemy of the victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 04:24 AM
46

Upvoted to high Heaven! I always love seeing peer-reviewed research that proves the existence of misandry. Here's the link to the study: https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241258690. It's open-access, which is always a bonus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/24 10:51 AM
3

I suppose maybe times have changed and unionization is seen as whiny and entitled behavior. Some people do have that mentality, even though it's wrong. I've watched a lot of YouTube videos about workers on strike. I've lost count of how many times I've read something like, "Don't like your job? QUIT instead of whining like a baby." I'll just leave one example. You can read the comments under that video yourself. A real man is supposed to take his beating. Not just from his opponent, but from his…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/24 02:51 AM
2

I hate the monopoly Dana [White] has on mma What MMA fighters need is a promotion company run by the fighters themselves, a worker co-op.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/24 10:26 PM
2

I was describing, not defending.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/24 10:16 PM
7

I've heard a lot of speculation as to why, but here are the possible reasons I find most convincing: 1. MMA fighters beat each other up for a living, and the thought of collectively bargaining with someone they have or had to fight is unappealing. 2. Fighting is a masculine sport, and they may see unionizing as "unmanly". 3. Dana White tries his damnest to squash any attempt at unioniation. edit: spelling
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/24 10:09 PM
2

Your post made me look up responses to this guy. I found some on YouTube.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/24 10:48 AM
16

They still have like 10 other subs tho Well, they used to have 11, so knocking it down to 10 is a good thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/24 12:46 AM
7

What does being "left wing" mean to you in regards to male issues and advocacy? It means I care about male issues, but I favor societal solutions over individual solutions. * Yes [v]: Building more homeless shelters for men * No [x]: Telling homeless men to "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" * Yes [v]: Persuading parents to stop circumcising boys for non-medical emergencies * No [x]: Telling men to "get over" their circumcision because being sad is "beta" * Yes [v]: Ending men's gender rol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/24 08:58 AM
1

I just reported six posts from that sub. The first three reports gave me the following auto-message: Thanks for submitting a report to the Reddit admin team. This content has already been investigated from a previous report. After investigating, we’ve found that the reported content doesn’t violate Reddit’s Content Policy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 12:19 AM
0

You say that, but then you proceed to "improve" it by adding details that don't have an analogue in the original subject matter and therefore take it further away from it. You're beyond belief. I’m improving your bad analogies by making your imagined scenarios similar to the scenario that actually happened. I even explain how I’m doing so every time I do so. You’re in denial. If it were stated as a 100% chance then that would basically be correct, although I would still go and surreptitiously re…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/24 04:12 AM
0

Tourist Couple: "Do any of you know of a good Italian restaurant in this city?" John: "Yes, <famous restaurant> over on the other side of the city from where we are is a great place for Italian food." Roger: "It's also very popular. If you make the trip over there without having reserved a table, there's a very high chance they will just tell you that they are fully booked." Is Roger advising the tourists not to go there, or is he providing some additional information about what to expect when g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 03:30 AM
1

When you were in school, did they teach you the difference between descriptive statements and normative statements? Yes, and they also taught me how to infer the intent of an author by reading their work and observing the context in which the work was written. Some people, who lack the courage to say what they mean, will hide behind simple descriptive statements to imply their meaning. My above comment contains all of two sentences, both of which are descriptive statements. They’re descriptive s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 04:17 AM
19

It’s disturbing that your comment has as many upvotes as it does. Your (implied) advice is defeatist and more likely to hurt men’s causes than help them. You’re suggesting that OP (u/Mustard_The_Colonel) do nothing because he’ll fail anyway. If everyone (not just men) followed your advice, social changes would never be made. Trying to fight back may lead to failure, but not fighting back guarantees failure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 11:30 PM
48

I feel like "toxic masculinity" and "toxic femininity" both exist under "toxic enforced gender roles" and I admit that doesn't have the same ring to it, but it's less pejorative and more accurate. How about "harmful gender roles"? It's plain English and has only five syllables.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/24 01:35 AM
6

WTF is this? If lawmakers are gonna be bigots, they should at least be equal-opportunity bigots.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 09:45 PM
1

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/24 09:07 AM
6

How do some people on the left do it? By applying confirmation bias. There's one simple sentence that every male advocate should memorize: "People can be privileged in some ways and unprivileged in other ways." If someone says male problems are caused by other men, you can tell them it doesn't matter because those problems should still be criticized. If they say you shouldn't expect women to care about men's issues, you can tell them you'll keep expressing your opinion even if they don't care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/24 03:51 AM
17

I've reported the hostile comments in that thread.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/24 06:08 AM
7

👍 Just remember, if you reload the page, and it won't load or says "server error", that means you've been blocked by the coward you're arguing with. And if you get blocked, you can still "win" the debate by editing your comment to indirectly "reply" to your opponent. But first, you'd have to see your opponent's response by going to your profile, right-clicking your comment, and left-clicking "Open Link in New Private Window". These instructions are for Firefox only.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 10:12 PM
21

I'm currently debating an anti-male from that thread. If you see her get the last word, it's probably 'cause the mods removed my comments without telling me. (Sometimes, moderators leave warnings when they delete comments, but not always.) edit: My opponent in that thread, like a big ol' chicken, blocked me. I still got the last word by editing my most recent reply to her.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 09:16 PM
27

They're just gonna pile on the male/masculine party, like they always do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 07:37 PM
12

When Harris was the Attorney General of California, 1974 people were imprisoned for owning, smoking, or selling weed.[1] Not just convicted or fined. Imprisoned. The title of that fact-check makes Harris look as good as possible. But if you read the details, the picture is far less rosy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/24 12:45 AM
1

I am not sure I understand the difference between men as a group and patriarchy in this context. Neither do I, but I'm glad to see a feminist stick their neck out for men. I don't expect to ever see it again, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/24 12:57 AM
7

That’s a post from 2 years ago. We can all see that in the screencap, yes. Not sure what you’re trying for here. I'm "trying" to show the first and only time I've ever seen a feminist defend men from another feminist. I explained it in the title.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/24 02:31 PM
1

Get a load of the two single-brain-celled organisms in this screenshot (first and third commenters). It's from OP's thread.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/24 08:13 PM
1

Here's a screen cap. Your link doesn't work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/24 08:35 AM
3

I've linked directly to my comment on r/science that explains the issue So where's the link?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/24 08:37 PM
6

I agree with you, but I think you repeat yourself too often. But again what I'm starting to realize is that people are just labeling traits they don't like in men toxic masculinity Again toxic masculinity is whatever they don't like in a man. But no to some people (usually feminists) toxic masculinity is whatever man do that they don't like. Again at this point toxic masculinity is just a trait or neutral behavior a particular woman doesn't like in a man. Again for the most part terms like toxic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/24 08:32 PM
40

Gender-Neutral Ettiquette If possible, stand at least one meter (3.3 ft) away from strangers. If you and another person are walking toward each other, don't make any sudden movements that look like pulling out a weapon. Keep your hands to yourself. Don't insult anyone. I think that covers it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 06:29 AM
2

Hmmmm understandably his focus was on the issue about his relationship Relationship issues deserve to be taken seriously, but in this case, they won't physically hurt him like his old man does. This is a safety issue. I’d save my comments until the guy asks for some support. This seems unsolicited. Considering how much the Reddit hive mind piled on him when he did ask for support, he's not likely to ask again. Sometimes, one has to take the initiative. Furthermore, this guy has seems happy about…
/r/MenSupportMen06/06/24 02:02 PM
2

Thank you so much for doing this! You're welcome! As for reporting my father, there’s not much that I could do. He’s a very high rank in the military and he’s got infinite connections that basically mean he can get away with quite a lot. That is terrifying. Nothing is worse than an abuser with a high rank. I'm sorry to hear about your situation. I’m hoping that once I graduate, I can find a job and stand on my own feet. That way I can distant myself from him without having to cut them off. After…
/r/MenSupportMen06/06/24 01:19 PM
10

What makes you believe that women would ever take responsibility for their emotions? I didn't say they would, only that they can.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/24 02:24 AM
11

This guy's life could be the subject of a biopic. That first page reads like something straight out of a crime thriller.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/24 08:08 AM
52

When it comes to men making women comfortable, there is never really a win for men. In that case, the solution is to do what's comfortable for you as long as you're not hurting anyone. If you're walking behind a woman, and she feels unsafe, she can cross the street herself. That's what I do. Free yourself from the burden of being mostly-responsible for other people's comfort. edit1: spelling
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/24 07:57 AM
13

Just 'cause some men victimize other men, doesn't mean society should let it happen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/24 09:37 AM
3

You can try requesting the full text from the author through ResearchGate, but in my experience, they never reply.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/24 03:02 PM
9

We can't change bullies; we can only embarrass them. Autistic men should start writing down and memorizing insults just in case someone messes with them.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:08 PM
2

Progress walks in small steps.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:04 PM
35

Lawyer up immediately.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:03 PM
12

The one on the right definitely gives off Karen vibes.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:01 PM
8

Men who are prosecuted for refusing to register for Selective Service. Men who are falsely accused of rape/domestic violence. Men who are getting divorced.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/24 08:23 AM
1

I'm glad you've decided to share your experiences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/24 06:59 AM
3

I personally do not struggle with acceptance, but maybe that's because my feminine traits aren't really obvious until you know me well. I own five stuffed animals. I like romance in fiction. I express my feelings through journaling. I enjoy watching defensive fighters. Those aren't things that come up in everyday conversation (except maybe that last one). If other people knew about my unmanly habits, maybe I would struggle to be accepted, and that's okay because I don't need judgmental people in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/24 08:03 AM
10

Well said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/24 05:04 AM
89

If Sloss' biggest fear is not getting wi-fi, he must have a lot of personal (not just male) privilege. He does not represent the men whose biggest fear is dying in war, dying from cancer, getting raped in prison, climate change affecting the future generations, losing their job, becoming homeless, or never escaping poverty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/24 04:24 AM
1

Does the legal system discriminate me[n]? Probably. In the good ol' US of A, female defendants are treated more leniently by the court system (Goulette et al., 2015). In South Korea, men have to either go through mandatory military service or a civilian service with prison-like conditions (De Guzman, 2022).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/24 02:06 PM
19

I can't really say my thoughts on anything related to gender or women without her getting offended. When I disagree she often thinks that I think shes not smart If someone reacts this way to polite disagreement, you can't have any kind of healthy relationship with them. Breaking up with her is not out of the cards. I think you should call out her behavior if you haven't already. Give her a chance to change, and, if she doesn't, drop her like a bad habit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/24 01:41 PM
5

"You have to answer for men's bad behavior." Fuck that. Ain't gotta answer for shit except your own behavior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/24 01:33 PM
10

Sound familiar or am I just being stupid? I don't think you're being stupid at all. I've witnessed the same thing on social media. Too many people don't want to accept that they support the same things they claim to be against (e.g. toxic masculinity). I think the most effective way to change the current culture is to argue with these people until you get the last word. You won't change their minds, but you might convince other people who lurk in the comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/23 09:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter