TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MarcoVincenzo Archive

View 26 posts and 144 comments by MarcoVincenzo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
177

Social IssuesMarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights07/07/16 12:22 AM
76

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:42 PM
61

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights21/05/11 12:18 PM
54

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights12/11/11 05:39 PM
40

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:02 PM
36

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:21 PM
33

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights01/10/11 01:07 PM
21

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:38 AM
19

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:14 AM
19

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights30/07/11 11:37 AM
18

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:05 AM
17

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights04/07/11 01:09 PM
15

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:27 PM
14

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights27/06/11 12:45 PM
13

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights04/07/11 03:53 PM
11

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights05/06/11 02:13 PM
7

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:12 PM
6

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights07/09/09 03:36 PM
6

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights31/07/11 10:40 PM
6

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:57 PM
5

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights07/05/11 12:41 PM
4

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights22/09/09 10:28 AM
4

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights17/01/12 02:58 PM
2

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights29/07/11 11:55 PM
0

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights13/11/11 12:31 PM
0

MarcoVincenzo/r/MensRights05/10/13 08:06 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

my goto law school source seems to have changed jobs. I'll try to respond back in a day or two. If I don't, I didn't reach her.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:41 PM
1

I had to upvote. Between democrats and republicans, you're right... they're same party with the same paymasters. Third parties exist but they've got a snowball's chance in Hell of ever winning anything.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:16 PM
1

My personal beliefs are small-government libertarian... live and let live with minimal government interference. Since that isn't happening, I tend to support individual candidates who, at least, give lip-service to shrinking government (few do, mostly it's talk, but they're at least thinking in the right direction). All of our problems, including MRA problems, are a result of too much government, so.... I could go on but it would be a multi-thousand word essay. If you have specific questions, go…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 09:14 PM
2

you need to provide some info on why you are asking these questions since it isn't a simple discussion.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:54 PM
20

$40 per person is not cheap. If she isn't interested in pursuing the relationship, fine, but she should pick up her share of the learning experience.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:02 AM
6

I'm hoping they all spent at least a month or so in jail--they need time to think about the stupidity they engaged in and all the lives they endangered.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/18 12:37 AM
0

They should visit some of the Moslam no-go areas to see what sexism really is.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 12:27 AM
7

The problem isn't that women (or men) don't know what consent is, it's that women do consent, generally in exchange for something, and then later regret their decision and cry rape. If you want to teach consent, teach women that it can't be withdrawn if they're later unsatisfied with the trade they made.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:51 PM
1

Done. Request submitted.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 02:30 AM
1

Of course, in both the accused and accuser roles--there are male accusers. But, the purpose of the trial is to determine what happened and who is to blame. Until the trial has concluded we can't determine who was the victim.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 02:25 AM
3

No fucking way. I bring a "witness" co-worker into every meeting where I have a female subordinate present... and the doors are never closed. I just down-checked a female colleague going with me to a conference. She's accompanied me before, but it's just too risky to do again. Women have made their bed, it's time for them to lie in it.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 02:10 AM
1

We don't even know who the "victim" is until after the trial... whether it was the accused or the accuser is one of the things the trial has to determine.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 01:35 AM
1

I call it our ‘grossly undervalued domestic product’: the caring, support and childcare women do without seeing a penny. And, what about "the caring support and childcare men do without seeing a penny". She thinks she's special and no one is special.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 01:28 AM
53

Elsesser remains hopeful that the current debate can morph into a national discussion about consent Consent is always given, but then days, weeks, months, years, later is withdrawn. There is no defense against that. The only safe response is to simply not interact with women at work, and if they suffer for it, so be it. This is what they've asked for.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:32 AM
3

Five to seven is more likely, but then ICE gets her and she'll be deported. MSM isn't mentioning it; she's an illegal alien.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 07:20 AM
1

Are you going to have it done to your daughters as well? If not, why?
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:04 AM
30

Nah, they just couldn't compete with Amazon.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 02:45 PM
3

As the article's title demonstrates; why not Female Genital Mutilation and Male Genital Mutilation, or Female Circumcision and Male Circumcision?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 12:00 PM
9

I'm betting the ratio was the opposite when my son was born in 1984, that's a lot of improvement. If you're curious, I was mutilated, my son wasn't.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 05:55 PM
23

Yep, using this picture (or the equivalent) and then writing the restaurant is sexist is a perfect review.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 05:52 PM
1

good bot.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 02:24 AM
2

Nah, scuba diving should be in there somewhere... especially diving on the continental rift with Eurasia on one side and North America on the other so you can see where it's coming apart.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:59 AM
2

It's actually a great place to visit. I've been there once and would like to go again.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 01:57 AM
1

They'll populate the festivals with third-raters (if they're that good) and the festivals will die. Of course, it won't be because people won't pay to hear garbage, it'll be because festivals are no longer popular.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:27 AM
1

I feel sorry for the poor cat :(
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:34 AM
6

There's a price for everything. I wonder what this will cost. Of course, women will then complain men are making more when they're being paid to adhere to these restrictions.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:38 AM
1

I was thinking yo-vixen :)
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:35 AM
8

Why do I doubt women will pay good money, lots of good money, to go somewhere without men? On the other hand, women who would spend a fortune to have a vacation away from men are not people I'd like to meet anyway... let them have their isolation.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:32 AM
1

That's what they thought :) it looks like judges are starting, just starting, to apply the law equally. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:01 AM
488

Sounds like a Title IX violation to me. I wonder how fast the law suit will appear.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 10:35 PM
3

This is much less disturbing than when young boys who have been raped are forced to pay child support to their rapist.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 08:59 PM
76

With feminism pushing them out of their traditional role of breadwinner, protector and provider – and divorce laws increasingly creating a dangerously precarious financial prospect for the men cut loose from marriage – men are simply no longer finding any benefit in it. Ah, they're starting to notice.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:11 PM
1

Exactly what is different between a skirt and a kilt? aside from the name attributed to it.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 11:26 PM
5

Archive link so you don't have to give this site clicks. https://archive.fo/xuVZe
/r/MensRights16/10/16 03:21 AM
1

even if she wins a second term She won't get a first term, if we get off our asses and vote.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 01:56 PM
3

As far back as 2002 Vera Baird QC pointed out the dangers of the exemption and called for an introduction of the Canadian law which states that a defendant must prove “reasonable steps to ascertain that the complainant was consenting”. So, guilty until proven innocent! Sounds like a feminist's wet dream.
/r/PussyPass15/10/16 01:15 PM
1

archive.is link. I hit a wall so I figured I'd post this in case anyone else did.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 03:12 PM
28

Finally a proper implementation of Title IX.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/16 12:41 AM
1

They should just wear skirts.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:02 AM
3

Men are increasingly refusing to marry these women and idiocy like this will simply speed up the process.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:51 PM
1

The victims were those who were falsely accused so that headline really confused me.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:36 PM
6

'I especially want to point out that what happened on the bus was not a "hate crime."' Ah, yes it was. It was just the black women who were committing the hate crime against a white woman and then lied to cover it up.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/16 02:00 AM
1

It isn't "hating men" to recognize that the animals invading Europe are creating a real rape culture... and that's something "liberals" have trouble accepting. Hence articles like that one from the puffhost.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 05:23 AM
0

Yep, this about what I expect from the SJWs at the puffhost. According to them only white men rape; those fine upstanding Muslim rapefugies would never do such a thing.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:18 AM
1

Open source robots. Program them however you like.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:19 AM
10

"Prison would be a Band-Aid covering over your issues." Yeah, I want to see a judge say this to a man who is convicted of molesting an infant.
/r/PussyPass25/01/16 11:21 PM
1

A razor will work equally well regardless of the part of the body being shaved. My "discount" Harry's razor works equally well on my head as it does on my face.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 12:11 AM
11

I always thought "pussy" was simply a shortened colloquial version of pusillanimous.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:09 PM
2

This will not go well, but male infantry Marines and Soldiers are the ones who will pay the price. Not for long. Those who can't pull their weight will be fragged sooner rather than later.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 10:22 PM
0

that many are supporters of a religion that is literally against logic & science All religions are against logic and science--it's part of the definition of religion.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 11:51 PM
9

Emma (Mattress Girl) Sulkowicz may be next. When Columbia either settles or is judged liable that becomes evidence that Sulkowicz is a malicious liar which can then be used in a suit against her.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:55 PM
32

Teacher who had sex with student Teacher who raped student; ftfy.
/r/PussyPass19/04/15 02:50 PM
13

any and every offense and slight that all men have done against all women since the start of time. Every perceived offense and slight; they don't need to be actual ones.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 09:33 PM
2

I disagree. By not publishing his/her name, the publication is forcing the idea to stand, or fall, on its own merits and not on the prestige (or lack thereof) associated with the author.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 11:36 AM
2

True enough... I forgot about him. But, he is one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence and was a major force in creating the United States. That said, when we have a long dead former President who was female she can replace him on the $100 bill.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 04:26 PM
-1

Every portrait on US paper money is a long dead former President. When we have a long dead former President who happens to be female, she can have her portrait on paper money.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:50 PM
2

If you look at what happened with the spread of Christianity in Europe, it abolished human sacrifice in every population that was Christianized. You've got the cart before the horse. Christianity itself was civilized by secular society, and as secular society spread Christianity came along for the ride
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:17 PM
4

The main message we want to come out of all this is that sexual assault is a problem nationwide that we need to act in preventing. Actually, the bigger problem is liars like Jackie who ensure that the next real victim simply won't be believed. I know my first thought at this point is that it's just another false accusation.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 01:48 AM
0

Nothing has been recast; the hoopla is nothing more than gold-diggers looking for a payday.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:55 AM
8

I wonder if it's the same case effecting Prof. David Barnett (article). He reported problems with the office that investigated an alleged assault and now they're trying to fire him. CU Boulder seems to be getting it wrong on all fronts.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:24 AM
0

And the statute of limitations has passed for all these women. They have no way of ever bringing a lawsuit against him now. Their motive isn't monetary. They can simply be planning to make enough noise that Cosby will pay them to go away--he's rich after all. If he wasn't rich they wouldn't have any reason to try to smear him.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:14 AM
2

On the contrary, until someone produces some evidence these accusations have no more credibility than any other accusation; hell, they've got less credibility since the obvious end-game these accusers are looking for is a big payout.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 10:36 PM
3

He's being tried in the court of public opinion; they're false accusations until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:49 PM
6

So much for women being able to choose what to do with their lives.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 11:29 PM
2

It isn't "justice" until the accuser is tried, convicted, and sentenced to serious time in jail.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:10 AM
1

you'll find that fathers with daughters are as big -- if not bigger -- proponents of the law as the feminists Ah, no. As a father with two daughters (29 and 26 now) I made sure they had access to contraception and knew how to use it... hell, my wife and I did that when they were in middle school, let alone college. So, don't go pushing this crap on fathers.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 04:59 PM
31

Marriage used to be advantageous, on the whole, for men; now it's primarily a long-term economic detriment. If society wants men to desire marriage then the rules will need to be changed so that it becomes an attractive choice rather than something to be avoided.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 10:49 PM
2

You lost your link when you made it a self-post by adding text.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:36 PM
29

PussyPass sure, on the charges. But, I don't really get the objection. If you can have a picture of her with her legs spread, why not have her with her legs spread?
/r/PussyPass14/09/14 12:44 PM
0

Yeah, women won the fashion war, but there are colorful men's socks. Pantherella makes quite a few at the medium end of the price range; I personally prefer the merino wool ones.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:47 AM
5

The CPS will only prosecute false allegations when they are 100% sure of a conviction. Then they should use the same criteria when prosecuting allegations of rape.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:08 PM
1

She's a legal adult now so I doubt child support comes into play (never know thought). But, the same question does apply to minor children so it needs to be answered. Like you said, lots of inherent contradictions.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 07:19 AM
2

She does seem confused (maybe the article's author was confused?). The man named on her birth certificate was her legal parent, just not her biological parent. And, an anonymous donor would not be named, so what does she want, just a blank space on the form? Is that what she has now?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 10:21 PM
1

I don't see it as ironic. The cultures that correspond with English speaking countries have an almost insatiable drive to "improve" our lived environment, and that environment includes our own bodies. And, that drive is still with us; but now instead of breeding a "pure" human the focus is on engineering a "better" human, on manipulating our own evolution (to the extent we can, though that's increasing every year). Take a look at Juan Enriquez's TED talk "Will our kids be a different species". I…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 11:30 AM
6

Doesn't surprise me. She doesn't respect the idea of voters being able to chose their representatives from an open field, but instead wants to decide in advance who they may select. This desire to control the behavior of others isn't limited to feminists, but they certainly do express it frequently.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 02:55 PM
1

As near as I can tell that's pure fiction being spread by anti-choice activists. But, you might want to look at the forced sterilizations performed in the US (by court order) at that time and how Hitler did adopt those (and the reasoning behind them) when he first started working toward "racial purity".
/r/MensRights16/08/14 02:12 PM
2

Eugenic policies were popular in the US too in the 1920s and '30s, right up to when Hitler also adopted them and put them into action.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:15 PM
108

Definitely sexist, but a more important issue is why do we still have Victorian Age age-of-consent laws?
/r/PussyPass10/08/14 12:18 PM
2

Excellent! This needs to happen every time a school assumes an accusation is by definition "true".
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:50 AM
3

No, the offensive part is that some adults think it's appropriate to slice pieces off of babies and young children. And, mutilate is the only appropriate word when someone slices pieces off of children when it isn't an absolute medical necessity.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:34 PM
3

I have to get to work, but here's a brief overview with links to other articles.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 10:08 AM
4

You're thinking of fecal therapy. It's being tested for a number of auto-immune disorders like Crohn's and Colitis.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:40 AM
0

That's one I hadn't even considered, but it's probably true as well... at least to the extent that there would be fewer men living in poverty because most of their earnings go to their ex.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:35 AM
14

There may be a perception that men are substandard caregivers, but that's mostly driven by media portrayals, it isn't a reflection of reality. (I've got 3 kids and 4 grandkids and have been parenting for 30 years and met a lot of other parents in that time. Some good parents were female, some were male, and sex wasn't a very good predictor of which group any individual parent would fall into.) As for gay couples, they have problems adopting not because they don't make excellent parents but becau…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:31 AM
2

Another tangential issue: some scientists believe that homosexuality is something that occurs developmentally Ah, wouldn't that go both ways (no pun intended)? If homosexuality occurs developmentally wouldn't heterosexuality also occur developmentally? Rather than no one being born homosexual we could just as easily have no one born heterosexual. But, if we're all using these artificial wombs I guess it wouldn't matter much which way it turned out.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 01:14 AM
9

Yeah, and vaginal birth provides a host of immunities that children born via cesarian section don't receive, but they're working on it. As this technology progresses I'm sure they'll look at a way to simulate that intimacy as well.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:14 AM
1

Does anyone know anything about how alexa gets their data? It differs quite a bit from Reddit's own survey (granted it was a few years ago) and the one done by Pew. Here's an article on those survey's results.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:42 PM
30

Well, some of the controversies are here, but some aren't even mentioned (in the article). The one that interests me is, what happens when men can have their own children without having to risk their financial future by getting married?
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:47 PM
3

The article certainly reads like it is.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:15 PM
26

It's honest work, and we all have to make a living. Besides, I'm not going to look down on anyone who gets a job, any job, rather than lazing about while sucking on the government (taxpayer) teat.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:34 AM
2

I'm waiting for the feminists to appear; if they can charge a man with killing a fetus they can also charge a woman. What's going to be more important to them, preventing men from abstaining from parenthood or ensuring that women are no longer able to exercise that option?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 10:46 PM
1

Most of that list is just common sense (which, evidently, isn't so common) for both men and women.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:01 AM
8

I don't have a problem with male circumcision I don't either when the person getting circumcised is 18 (or older) and choosing it for him- or herself. What I object to is mutilating babies and children who have no say in what's being done to their bodies.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:00 PM
2

The father's name being listed is the part I was referring to. Establishing paternity and acquiring citizenship are two completely different things. The only time citizenship would come into play is: if the mother and father have different citizenship the child is born in a country neither parent has citizenship in and possibly a few other instances I can't think of on my first cup of coffee. but other than that, the child would generally become a citizen of where he/she is born.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 01:05 PM
30

Just one more reason that DNA testing to confirm paternity should be done at birth before a birth certificate is issued.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 02:52 AM
5

When one is oversensitive to a topic, everything in the world simply becomes an extension of that sensitivity; bot not everything is related to sex.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 02:50 AM
5

Here's a herpes story, here's one on amputation, and here's a death. New York City actually has a special consent form parents must sign because of all the problems associated with the procedure. The "Jewish community" fought it, but it's still around--here's a story on their opposition (and loss in court). The last paragraph also notes that 12 infants contracted herpes and 2 died as a result, which is one of the main reasons the law survived.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 06:54 PM
13

Well, shit. How big of a clue stick do they need. You can't go more than a few weeks without hearing of some baby boy who contracted herpes, had his entire penis amputated, or died from a procedure that's completely unnecessary.
/r/MensRights18/01/14 09:06 AM
15

Circumcision is genital mutilation when it's done to a child who has no say in the matter. If a man wants to have the procedure done when he becomes an adult and can make an informed decision that's fine. But no one should be allowed to start cutting off pieces of someone else's body without an immediate medical need to do so.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:36 PM
4

I was circumcised as an infant in 1962, but neither my son nor my grandsons are circumcised. My son is almost 30 and has never shown any sign that he wanted the procedure and my grandsons can decide for themselves when they turn 18. No one has a right to start cutting off parts of another person's body without a clear medical necessity to do so.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 09:18 PM
35

Cab driver falsely accused of rape saved by his phone app. Cabbies have more to fear from their passengers than the other way around.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:09 AM
2

You're (mistakenly) operating under the assumption that the US military exists to protect the US. That hasn't been true for a long long time. Today the military's primary duty is to project American corporate power in places that have raw materials someone in the elite wants. The military, by and large, are viewed as mercenaries and they're more than willing to accept quite a bit of breakage as long as they can keep the costs down and still get what they want.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 05:58 PM
1

It's a hard call. My wife and I had "the third", and then I got a vasectomy (she was on birth control but it didn't work and there was no way we could afford a 4th), so.... Keep talking, explain what you're feeling, and maybe offer to permanently see to it that you don't have a 4th as well, which would allow her to stop using birth control--that might convince her to go for one more all by itself.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 03:17 AM
8

The main point is that this debate really is not about religion. It's about the simple and basic question "should be allowed to perform unnecessary and irreversible surgery on infants?". I think the answer must be no. That's about as clear as it can be said.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 01:54 PM
2

What other professional tool companies do you guys know of? The only other one I know of is Mac. If the lady does eventually call back, be nice to her and explain the issue calmly. Men's cancers get so little press she may honestly not know of them or how they effect us. Women have spent the last 30 years building awareness; we haven't done that yet.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:07 AM
2

None whatsoever. On the other hand the physical injuries to the first child were self-evident enough that the father noticed them when he picked up his child from daycare. But, I think I'll avoid speculating until (unless) I acquire more details.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:21 PM
27

Of course. The deck is stacked against men so any who survive to graduate are bound to be more self-confident in their ability to adapt and excel regardless of what life throws at them.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:57 PM
12

Won't fly when they have video of her abusing the infant: A police report shows it [the computer] belonged to Koon and contained a video file of her "engaging in sexual conduct with an unknown infant".
/r/MensRights06/10/13 04:09 PM
13

Male genital mutilation is no different than female genital mutilation, and those who perform either should suffer the same punishment.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:13 PM
0

The bill was partially a reaction to a 2011 court decision involving a lesbian couple that briefly ended their relationship, according to Leno's office. One of the women was impregnated by a man before the women resumed their relationship. A fight broke out, putting one of the women in the hospital and the other in jail, but the daughter was sent to foster care because her biological father did not have parental rights. This is a nice advance of men's rights, ensuring they're not denied the righ…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 08:07 AM
121

Send complete info to the Electronic Frontier Foundation and see what they say. They may or may not be able to help, but they should definitely know who else you could get help from.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 09:40 PM
30

Wrong tense. They have already become anti-boy.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:20 AM
3

There is no "abortion industry". The hullabaloo surrounding abortion is the same as for many other things: some people want to control what other people can do. The problem with abortion, from a men's rights perspective, is that only women are granted the ability to determine if they will become parents. Men should not be able to tell women what to do with their bodies, but women should not be able to force a man into parenthood. The only course that is fair to both parties is for men to be able…
/r/MensRights21/09/13 11:49 AM
7

There Is A Brazilian Mascot For Testicular Cancer Named Mr. Balls.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:04 PM
14

No one's been drafted for ~40 years so that doesn't really matter. What matters is that they'll have to register and jump through the same hoops men do. Equality is a good thing.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:52 PM
13

Agreed, but unless the girls are treated the same as the boys no one will even notice how badly the boys are treated.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 08:46 AM
5

It's certainly nice to see that cops are beginning to recognize that women can be the aggressors and to arrest accordingly--rather than arresting the man by default.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:07 PM
1

I actually stopped at "womyn". But yeah, done.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:41 PM
4

Can you imagine what the trail would have been like if the victim had instead been an unarmed 17 year-old white female? Martin wasn't the victim, he was the aggressor. Though, a 17-year-old white female aggressor, even a dead one, would probably have assured that Zimmerman was convicted since no one would have believed she could be violent or have started the confrontation. For men's rights, it's that inability to recognize that women can be the aggressors that's the real problem.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:44 PM
4

Of course it's about the money, but without transparency there is no hope of change so anything that works to make this common knowledge is a "good thing"™.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:12 PM
10

If this happens often enough maybe judges will start ordering paternity tests before awarding child support.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 10:47 PM
1

More like parenting failure. Who the hell lets their 8-year-old walk off with anyone they just met? But, we can't blame the woman now, can we?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 06:47 AM
11

Skirts are more comfortable, and cooler, than shorts anyway so maybe this will become "a thing".
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:04 PM
2

Most folks are comfortable... as long as they agree with what's being imposed. But, when it comes to laws, the political winds will shift and the structures they once supported will be the same ones they revile when they're used against them. All too many forget this. For me, laws should be crafted with the assumption that your fiercest opponent will be the one interpreting and enforcing them. If he can't unjustly use them against you, you can't unjustly use them against others--this is what we …
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:25 PM
1

Sure, but intent is a what question, not a why question. We care that the person robbed the liquor store (the what), we don't really care why they did it, only that they did do it. There are exceptions, stealing to feed one's hungry children, for example. But, for the most part we don't focus on tacking on extra punishment for people's thought processes... except for "hate crimes". When it comes to enforcing laws, the what should be enough.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:11 PM
2

The entire concept of "hate crimes" is simply a politically correct way of punishing someone for their thoughts rather than their actions. It's nothing more than a way for the politically powerful to impose (via the legal system) their views on others. When people are punished for what they think rather than what they do we're (as a society) simply asking for tyranny because we're granting to others the right to dictate what we should think.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:13 PM
1

It's simply a distraction (or should I say diversion?) to keep us from paying attention to the truly important events occurring in our society.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:02 PM
2

It's a combination of sweat, sand, and a lack of bathing (the sand becomes like sandpaper and the constant abrasion creates open wounds). In WWII many allied troops in North Africa ended up getting circumcised because they were getting constant infections for these very reasons. But, in normal modern conditions with access to soap and water the rates of infection are about the same for the circumcised and uncircumcised.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 10:52 AM
2

The article includes a link to part 1.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 11:37 AM
2

I posted an image because it took 3 tries to get the page to completely load, but here it is if anyone wants/needs it: link.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 01:11 PM
2

Bullshit article. Why would you use this article for a link? So that I could comment upon it while providing the entirety of what I was commenting upon for others to read if they wished. I've only got one other post in this thread. Take a look at it before getting all over condemnatory.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 11:11 PM
16

One can only hope the courts do the practical and intuitive thing, and strike this down after it passes. It will save parents from taking their sons outside city borders to be born. And hundreds of thousands of male San Franciscans are saved from the distinctly uncomfortable prospect of making the decision for themselves as adults. Yeah, cant have men making that decision for themselves! Idiots!
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:29 PM
3

I was mutilated as an infant, but neither my son nor my grandson were. It's never been an issue.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 06:19 PM
2

sadly, I don't think this will go very far due to people pressing the "religious persecution" angle. Maybe, maybe not. I think it would be very difficult for anyone to claim that an infant has made the decision to adopt any religious beliefs. And, if parents don't have the right to amputate other parts of an infant based on their beliefs, they'll be hard pressed to justify this one.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 06:17 PM
6

If you aren't willing to circumcise your daughter (should you have one) you shouldn't be willing to circumcise your son. No child should be have his or her genitalia mutilated by adults.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 11:29 AM
-1

"More attention needs to be paid to the 94% of reported cases that do not end in conviction rather than the few that are false. From the statistic, it certainly looks like approximately 94% of accusations are false.
/r/MensRights20/05/10 05:23 PM
3

If there is a real assault there should be a real criminal trial. Sorry, but a school "hearing" just doesn't cut it.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 09:19 AM
3

Some animals are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 09:13 AM
1

Ah, the truth is finally coming out! Historically women start fights and men get arrested. Now, women start fights and they're getting arrested. Maybe they'll stop starting fights, or maybe not.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 06:02 AM
7

I think that a big reason why there is oftentimes no punishment for false accusations of sexual assault is because no one wants to make it in any way harder for actual victims to report actual criminals. The woman who falsely reported a rape is a real criminal, and the men she accused are real victims. She should be arrested and go to jail just like a man would be arrested and go to jail.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 05:40 AM
12

How much you want to bet that she doesn't get prosecuted either? So, after trying to destroy the lives of 4 men she gets off scott free. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 07:48 AM
4

Yeah, that long history is probably of objecting to policies that don't allow due process. Considering that somewhere between 40% and 60% of rape charges are false I don't even want to know the percentage of "harassment" charges that are false--due process for the accursed must exist.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 06:48 AM
8

Ten percent of the prison population is women, but their incarceration rate is too high. Ninety percent of the prison population is men, but they aren't mentioned. Assuming a 50/50 split between men and women I think Oklahoma has it's priorities wrong and they should be working on reducing the number of male inmates until it equals that of women.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 12:07 PM
7

I'm hoping the guy files for divorce. Since he is the victim of domestic violence he should get everything!
/r/MensRights28/07/09 04:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter