~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | I have a question. Why do men seem to care more about what women do more than women care more about what men do?This was actually debunked by a more recent scientific study: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/new-study-shows-declining-maternal-mortality-rates-in-states-with-strong-pro-life-laws/ https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/mainstream-media-mislead-on-a-decline-in-the-u-s-maternal-mortality-rate/ This doesn't mean that such laws are beneficial to maternal health, but it doesn't mean they are harmful either. Mostly, they have no effect as the maternal mortality rate in the United States is vast… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/07/26 12:16 AM |
| 1 | I have a question. Why do men seem to care more about what women do more than women care more about what men do?There are many women online who constantly complain they can't find "good men" and that men have high standards, unrealistic expetations and only go for attractive women, because they feel entitled to these "good men" apparently and they are absolutely livid they aren't getting picked instead. These types of women have way more in common with religious nutcases than human rights activists too. You act as if only men are engaging in these short of shaming tactics, as if women don't constantly com… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 02/07/26 12:06 AM |
| 2 | I have a question. Why do men seem to care more about what women do more than women care more about what men do?Studies actually show that women are as likely to engage in "mate guarding", mainly around shaming and ostracising other women, especially in regards to their own sexual behaviour. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 11:54 PM |
| 1 | I have a question. Why do men seem to care more about what women do more than women care more about what men do?Not necessarily true, the maternal mortality rate in the United States is vastly overestimated and is no higher than most European countries. It has actually not increased since in the overturning of Roe v Wade: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000293782400005X https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/new-study-shows-declining-maternal-mortality-rates-in-states-with-strong-pro-life-laws/ That doesn't mean the overturning of the Roe v Wade is a good thing for maternal health, it si… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 11:40 PM |
| 1 | Fellas it isn’t a matter of women not being into you because of lack of moral character but seeing you as defective/incompetentBut why do women date these powerful men, if they have the power to ruin their lives on a whim exactly? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 11:23 PM |
| 1 | Fellas it isn’t a matter of women not being into you because of lack of moral character but seeing you as defective/incompetentSure, but why it is that powerful men like Donald Trump and Henry Kissinger have no problem attracting women then? If women don't care about power, why do powerful men don't seem to struggle with women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 11:22 PM |
| 1 | Fellas it isn’t a matter of women not being into you because of lack of moral character but seeing you as defective/incompetentSo, if women are afraid of men who places so much importance on power, then why do powerful men like Donald Trump and Henry Kissinger have no problem attracting women? The aforementioned men are absolutely horrible and have done done terrible things yet they had no problem attracting women. Why is that exactly? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 11:17 PM |
| 1 | Negative talking points about women will always exist as long as guys can keep pointing out how women behave onlineYou complain that men say "Sexist" things yet you describe them as "cruel and sociopathic" lol. Utter contradictions here and just do you know, women are as likely to commit domestic and sexual violence according to various scientific studies. So your ridiculous bear example should include women too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Negative talking points about women will always exist as long as guys can keep pointing out how women behave onlineWhat you described is effectively a "dual mating strategy" in Evolutionary Psychology and Biology, which is precisely why these types of individuals are avoided when it comes to long term relationship formation. And also, since these types of individuals, of both genders by the way, don't find their partners attractive but they lower their standards just enter into a relationship with someone more compatible with them, they end up either breaking up or in a sexless relationship as time progresse… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 06:08 PM |
| 1 | Negative talking points about women will always exist as long as guys can keep pointing out how women behave onlineWhat you described is effectively a "dual mating strategy" in Evolutionary Psychology and Biology, which is precisely why these types of individuals are avoided when it comes to long term relationship formation. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 06:04 PM |
| 0 | Negative talking points about women will always exist as long as guys can keep pointing out how women behave onlineSure, anyone can claim anything on the internet after all. I find it hard to believe that he slept with 7 women in one day. These body counts that you are talking about are in the realm of famous celebrities, rock stars and sex workers. The average sexual partner count globally is 9, so not even in the double digits. But like I said, anyone can claim anything on the internet after all. Heck, I can claim that I am a millionaire too lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 05:58 PM |
| 0 | Negative talking points about women will always exist as long as guys can keep pointing out how women behave onlineYeah, I highly doubt that. Most players are able to sleep with many women because they massively lower their standards, any women would do for them. They aren't hitting the attractive chicks who have much higher standards to begin with. Also, I cast doubt on that guy having a triple digit body count, that is in the realm of celebrities, rockstars and sex workers. The average sexual partner count globally is 9, not even in the double digits. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 05:52 PM |
| 1 | Women's preferences make senseSure and then you woke up lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 05:39 PM |
| 1 | Women's preferences make senseNope, actually most women prefer older men and the average married couple has a 3 year age gap according to the available statistics. Also, men prefer women that are younger than themselves and not women in their late teens and early 20's. You aren't helping your case that women's standards are supposedly more reasonable than men's are. They are not, everyone is superficial and materialistic to an extent, get over it lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 05:32 PM |
| 1 | Women's preferences make senseExcuses and anything else except taking accountability. Food is made to be addictive in Europe too yet Europeans aren't as obese and overweight as Americans are. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 05:24 PM |
| 1 | Women's preferences make senseThat's not necessarily true, size queens don't have bigger vaginas, they are just sexually inexperienced and don't know a lot about sex in my own experience. If a woman has a bigger vagina, then girth would be more important than length in that scenario, since it would cause more friction and it would be far more capable of hitting her vaginal walls and giving her pleasure easier than a big dick would. And I definitely agree that many people confuse more "Masculine" personality traits with being… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 05:09 PM |
| 1 | Women's preferences make sensePenis size isn't as important because most women orgasm from clitoral stimulation and not from penetration anyways. It's mostly about not being small and not about being big. Unless a man has a micropenis (which only 2% of the population has) or a very small dick, then it doesn't really matter since most men are already average and can get the job done. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 04:57 PM |
| – | Women's preferences make senseWhich is no different than women like yourself, who moderately hate men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 04:44 PM |
| 1 | Women's preferences make senseYoung men aren't "Progressive" based on the polling that we have, they are actually "Independent" and most of those who voted in the previous election voted for Donald Trump just like 40% of young women did (most young people didn't vote at all). Although again, most young men and women are "Independent", neither "Progressive" but nor "Conservative". However I definitely agree that most young men aren't a part of the "Manosphere" nor they are "Feminists". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 04:41 PM |
| – | Women's preferences make senseIronic coming from a "Feminist Misandrist" imbecile like yourself. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 04:35 PM |
| 1 | Women's preferences make senseBut they won't, most manual labour jobs are done by men. Women are free to do these jobs but they aren't signing up for them. Very few are voluntarily doing these jobs right now, what part of it you don't understand? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 04:34 PM |
| 0 | Women's preferences make senseBecause these types of men have their own standards and preferences too you dufus. These high quality men have very high standards and preferences, so you shouldn't complain if they aren't picking women like yourself and go for more attractive, educated and younger women. And that's usually the case, just like with high quality women demanding high quality men. You can have high standards all you want, but the problem lies on whether you can also meet the standards of others in return. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 01/07/26 04:30 PM |
| 5 | Just another doctored, scripted and "fake" viral social media clip about women's experiences in public transportation of being overwhelmed by "creeps" or whatever.The term "creepy" has been diluted to the point that it effectively means nothing anymore. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/26 07:46 AM |
| 0 | Children's Book Author Kouri Richins Found Guilty Of Murdering HusbandThey aren't lol. Nobody is defending her, everybody is calling her out regardless of gender. Just take a peek at the comments section in he YouTube video above. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 02/04/26 08:36 PM |
| 7 | Woman insinuates that men have such insatiable sexual urges, they will rape and sexually abuse women if they do not get sex otherwise. Who is promoting "rape myths" again?Well of course, if rape had anything to do with sexual frustration, then monasteries and remote locations will be filled to the brim with perverts and sex crimes. "Feminists" will complain about "rape myths" all day, but they refuse to condemn the women that promote them. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 07:20 PM |
| 8 | Woman insinuates that men have such insatiable sexual urges, they will rape and sexually abuse women if they do not get sex otherwise. Who is promoting "rape myths" again?"Feminists" will complain about "Traditional" gender norms all day, yet the refuse to hold the women that enforce them accountable. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 07:19 PM |
| 17 | Woman insinuates that men have such insatiable sexual urges, they will rape and sexually abuse women if they do not get sex otherwise. Who is promoting "rape myths" again?"Feminists" will complain about "Traditional" gender norms all day, yet the refuse to hold the women that enforce them accountable. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 07:18 PM |
| 15 | Woman insinuates that men have such insatiable sexual urges, they will rape and sexually abuse women if they do not get sex otherwise. Who is promoting "rape myths" again?"Feminists" will complain about "Traditional" gender norms all day, yet the refuse to hold the women that enforce them accountable. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 07:18 PM |
| 5 | Woman insinuates that men have such insatiable sexual urges, they will rape and sexually abuse women if they do not get sex otherwise. Who is promoting "rape myths" again?How is my argument "disinformation" exactly? I literally admitted that I am aware of the research the legalisation of prostitution lowers rape rates overall, but it does not completely eliminate them. Furthermore, perhaps some of those rapists go on to rape prostitutes instead? That might be a possibility, but it still does not provide evidence to that outdated view that men are brutes that are so consumed by their sexual urges, that will even rape women in order to satisfy them. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 07:17 PM |
| 4 | Woman insinuates that men have such insatiable sexual urges, they will rape and sexually abuse women if they do not get sex otherwise. Who is promoting "rape myths" again?How is my argument "disinformation" exactly? I literally admitted that I am aware of the research the legalisation of prostitution lowers rape rates overall, but it does not completely eliminate them. Furthermore, perhaps some of those rapists go on to rape prostitutes instead? That might be a possibility, but it still does not provide evidence to that outdated view that men are brutes that are so consumed by their sexual urges, that will even rape women in order to satisfy them. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 07:17 PM |
| 6 | Woman insinuates that men have such insatiable sexual urges, they will rape and sexually abuse women if they do not get sex otherwise. Who is promoting "rape myths" again?Rape has indeed absolutely nothing to do with sex, but has everything to do with power, something supported by a substantial amount research. I am aware the legalisation of prostitution lowers rape rates overall, but sex crimes still unfortunately occur in countries that have legalised prostitution. Sexual perverts will always exist, whether outlets to satisfy their sexual needs exist or not. It is actually incredibly dehumanising to men to assert the false narrative that men are so consumed by … | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 05:04 PM |
| 1 | Feminists claim that women's sport participation rates are lower when compared to men's, due to alleged "Sexism" and fears of personal safety.I did, but they also claimed that biological women also participate in sports less due to "Sexism" or fears over personal safety. I wanted to push back against those claims, by highlighting that women in general have a lower sports participation rate due to a lack of intest and not because of "Sexism" or fears over personal safety: https://www.academia.edu/12176988/Sex_differences_in_sports_interest_and_motivation_An_evolutionary_perspective https://time.com/4322947/men-women-sports-evolution/ | /r/MensRights | 11/03/26 05:47 PM |
| 3 | Feminists claim that women's sport participation rates are lower when compared to men's, due to alleged "Sexism" and fears of personal safety.Indeed, scientific studies showcase that women's sports participation is lower due to a lack of interest and not because of "Sexism" or due to supposed fears over personal safety: https://www.academia.edu/12176988/Sex_differences_in_sports_interest_and_motivation_An_evolutionary_perspective If personal safety was really the case, then most solo travelers would not be female lol. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/26 05:45 PM |
| 1 | Feminists claim that women's sport participation rates are lower when compared to men's, due to alleged "Sexism" and fears of personal safety.Careful observation, men actually watch women's sports more than women themselves even: https://time.com/4322947/men-women-sports-evolution/ It is not due to "underfunding", it is due to the lack of interest in behalf of women themselves. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/26 05:44 PM |
| 3 | Feminists claim that women's sport participation rates are lower when compared to men's, due to alleged "Sexism" and fears of personal safety.Careful observation, men actually watch women's sports more than women themselves even: https://time.com/4322947/men-women-sports-evolution/ | /r/MensRights | 11/03/26 05:43 PM |
| 1 | Feminists claim that women's sport participation rates are lower when compared to men's, due to alleged "Sexism" and fears of personal safety.People there accuse others of being "Incels", are usually one themselves lol. It is called psychological projection. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/26 05:41 PM |
| 18 | Feminists claim that women's sport participation rates are lower when compared to men's, due to alleged "Sexism" and fears of personal safety.Indeed, scientific studies showcase that women's sports participation is lower due to a lack of interest and not because of "Sexism" or due to supposed fears over personal safety: https://www.academia.edu/12176988/Sex_differences_in_sports_interest_and_motivation_An_evolutionary_perspective If personal safety was really the case, then most solo travelers would not be female lol. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 03:14 PM |
| 1 | This is a post from divorced women page… you can’t make this shit up. I will never marry againSure, let's just address all your baseless points one by one with the actual statistics in mind, innit? On your first point about women handling the disporportionate amount of housework, you completely ignore that according to various scientific studies, men oftentimes work longer hours and do the financial heavy lifting in most relationships, leaving them with less leisure time at the end of the day when compared to women. Once those attributes are factored in, the amount of effort and work bot… | /r/Divorce_Men | 08/03/26 06:54 PM |
| 1 | Tell me your thoughts on this videoActually, all the available statistics show the exact opposite. Worldwide, women have a significantly lower amount of children than they actually desire: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-fertility-gap-and-womens-happiness So, the lower overall fertility rates do not appear to be driven by women themselves, but for a variety of factors such as economics, the cost of living crisis and demanding work environments that leave many with no leisure time to date. In regards to your second claim, data from… | /r/Divorce_Men | 08/03/26 06:05 PM |
| 1 | Tell me your thoughts on this videoActually, all the available statistics show the exact opposite. Worldwide, women have a significantly lower amount of children than they actually desire: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-fertility-gap-and-womens-happiness So, the lower overall fertility rates do not appear to be driven by women themselves, but for a variety of factors such as economics, the cost of living crisis and demanding work environments that leave many with no leisure time to date. In regards to your second claim, data from… | /r/Divorce_Men | 08/03/26 06:04 PM |
| 1 | Personal advice in optics: Do NOT let them call you 'anti-feminist'Nope, there is absolutely zero credible evidence that we live in a so called "Patriarchy", which does not freaking exist outside of Islamic Theocracies, how many times do we have to state this out loud? You just provided further evidence on why "Feminists" are considered to be idiots, are not respected and why they should not be taken seriously. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/03/26 09:43 AM |
| 1 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?Not only I have spoken to many women as a result of working in a female dominated workplace environment, I have been surrounded by many women in my entire life, yet none of them have experienced actual "creepy" behaviours. I guess that such women do not really count in the eyes of "Feminists", because they do not fit their own narrative. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 11:38 PM |
| 1 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?Therefore, you haven't actually experienced genuine "creepy" behaviours such as sexual harassment and stalking, you just had a bunch of individuals "staring" at yourself in public and leaving "mean" comments against you on social media. You are just proving my point, as none of those are actual "creepy" behaviours. Actual scientific studies, that have asked thousands of women globally, beg to differ: https://lovists.com/2021/04/26/some-feminist-readers-may-want-to-sit-before-continuing/ Are such… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 11:30 PM |
| 1 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?I have talked to the women in my own personal life and I have asked them about their personal experiences, not a single one of them has experienced genuine "creepy" behaviours such as sexual harrassment, assault and stalking. The problem with surveys like the one above, is they usually utilise small to moderate sample sizes and suffer from self-selection bias. Much larger surveys, including the ones conducted by the FBI, show that most women are not victims of crime and that men comprise the ove… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 11:24 PM |
| 1 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?I have talked to the women in my own personal life and I have asked them about their personal experiences, not a single one of them has experienced genuine "creepy" behaviours such as sexual harrassment, assault and stalking. The problem with surveys like the one above, is they usually utilise small to moderate sample sizes and suffer from self-selection bias. Much larger surveys, including the ones conducted by the FBI, show that most women are not victims of crime and that men comprise the ove… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 11:23 PM |
| 1 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?But women are indeed exaggerating in such flawed and biased surveys, which usually have small to moderate sample sizes and suffer from self-selection bias. I know many women, but not a single one of them has experienced what you have experienced. I also know many men that have had those experiences that you are describing as well, but they are obviously not the majority too. Other surveys with much larger sample sizes, including the ones conducted by the FBI, showcase that a significantly smalle… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 11:16 PM |
| 1 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?Sure, but how come that small minority of men, are supposedly able to approach the vast majority of women then? Don't they have lives, they spend all their free time approaching women? Can you understand how this argument does not make sense and is completely illogical? | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 11:11 PM |
| 1 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?It was a consensus style survey shared on PsychologyToday with 1.000 responders, so a decent sample size nevertheless. The problem is that it focused on the subjective experiences of responders and did not really define what the term "creepy" even means, which is a pretty nebulous concept already. Other surveys with much larger sample sizes have found significantly lower instances of actual "creepy" behaviour, such as sexual harrassment, assault and stalking. I do believe that self-selection bia… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 11:08 PM |
| 1 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?Indeed, the data seems flawed. Consensus styled and subjective based surveys like that are always a cause for concern and should not be believed. For example, the FBI releases crime surveys anually, with massive sample sizes of both men and women, looking to gauge both the reported and the underproted level of crime. Very few women in those surveys report genuine sexual harassment, assault and stalking behaviours though. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 11:03 PM |
| 2 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?The woman who say things like that are a massive red-flag, no wonder they act so crazy over the internet. Usually, they are expressing their own deep rooted insecurities and their failure in life, including their failure to find a partner. Just hop on the R/TwoX subreddit to see all those miserable "Feminists", in case you have any doubts. Anyone who acts miserable on the internet, regardless of gender, is a massive red-flag and is probably miserable in real life. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/26 10:58 PM |
| 19 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?Perhaps, or it might be they use an expanded definition of "creepy", which includes otherwise innocent interactions and behaviours. Or perhaps, due to the low response rate in surveys like that, this might cause a self-reflection bias where women that have experienced genuinely "creepy" behaviours are more likely to respond, overly inflating the actual numbers. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/26 12:31 AM |
| 12 | Debunking a survey shared on Psychology Today, claiming that 82% of women supposedly state they experience "creepy" behaviours?Perhaps, or it might be they use an expanded definition of "creepy", which includes otherwise innocent interactions and behaviours. Or perhaps, due to the low response rate in surveys like that, this might cause a self-reflection bias where women that have experienced genuinely "creepy" behaviours are more likely to respond, overly inflating the actual numbers. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/26 12:31 AM |
| 14 | "Radical Feminist" hypocrite criticises the supposed "Sexism" and "Hypersexualisation" in the American Eagle Seedney Sweeney ad, in spite the fact that she also sexualises herself and has even advocated for women to take advantage of their looks to get ahead in life.Isn't it immensely hypocritical for individuals like herself to consistently complain about "Hypersexualisation" and the supposedly "Sexist" culture that we are living in, yet simultaneously dressing nice, wearing makeup and posting highly edited photos of themselves on social media? I mean, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that and good for them, but aren't they are engaging in the exact same culture they are criticising? It is the equivalent of Religious Fundamentalists that publicly con… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/26 03:42 AM |
| 3 | "Radical Feminist" hypocrite criticises the supposed "Sexism" and "Hypersexualisation" in the American Eagle Seedney Sweeney ad, in spite the fact that she also sexualises herself and has even advocated for women to take advantage of their looks to get ahead in life.Isn't it immensely hypocritical for individuals like herself to consistently complain about "Hypersexualisation" and the supposedly "Sexist" culture that we are living in, yet simultaneously dressing nice, wearing makeup and posting highly edited photos of themselves on social media? I mean, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that and good for them, but aren't they are engaging in the exact same culture they are criticising? It is the equivalent of Religious Fundamentalists that publicly con… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/26 03:40 AM |
| 16 | "Radical Feminist" hypocrite criticises the supposed "Sexism" and "Hypersexualisation" in the American Eagle Seedney Sweeney ad, in spite the fact that she also sexualises herself and has even advocated for women to take advantage of their looks to get ahead in life.She literally promoted unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about American Eagle supposedly targeting men with that ad campaign and not necessarily women, despite the fact that according to their own official marketing statistics, their jeans and apparel sold pretty well with both men and women: https://people.com/sydney-sweeney-american-eagle-collection-sells-out-breaks-records-after-viral-campaign-11803392 According to polls, only 12% of Americans found that ad to be "offensive" at all, most pe… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/26 01:52 AM |
| 2 | Woman faces charges for raping an underage boy. The woman's family makes a statement blaming misogyny about the visibility of her case.Even better, if you are Bill Clinton and Joe Biden, you get elected by the same individuals chanting "believe all women"! | /r/PussyPassDenied | 20/08/25 03:59 AM |
| 1 | Woman faces charges for raping an underage boy. The woman's family makes a statement blaming misogyny about the visibility of her case.Says the Left-Wing Incel lol. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 20/08/25 03:58 AM |
| 0 | Woman faces charges for raping an underage boy. The woman's family makes a statement blaming misogyny about the visibility of her case.Just like the "Progressive" base having Bill Clintin and Joe Biden as their leaders.. Why do you lads think that you are somehow better than your political opponents is beyond me. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 20/08/25 03:57 AM |
| 1 | Woman faces charges for raping an underage boy. The woman's family makes a statement blaming misogyny about the visibility of her case.More than 60% of all teachers in the United States vote Democrat. Most of the teachers apprehended for sex crimes are probably Democrats as well. Those who complain about the so called "Rape Culture" the most, are the ones seemingly perpetuating it. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 20/08/25 03:54 AM |
| 1 | You don’t need to talk to 100 girls. You need to be seen by the right 10While you are not necessarily necessarily wrong, you also failed to mention that women do the same thing constantly as well. Yet nobody calls them out on said behaviour. Especially "Feminists" like yourself. People are just just plain abhorrent mate, not just men. Putting women on the pedestal is a recipe for a disaster. And is definitely not very "Progressive", in fact, it is incredibly "Sexist". | /r/seduction | 02/08/25 08:10 PM |
| 0 | 22m feeling emotionally connected but not sexually desired by 22F girlfriendDo not listen to him mate. Your girlfriend is just not sexually attracted to you. She had no problem being sexually open in previous relationships, so the topic at hand is not some imaginary fear over societal judgement. She is probably settling for you because she has no other options currently. Do yourself a favour, dump her and go find a woman that is actually attracted to you. The rest will follow. | /r/seduction | 20/07/25 11:41 PM |
| 0 | 22m feeling emotionally connected but not sexually desired by 22F girlfriendYou literally come across as having no real experience with women. Some women do not even have a "dirty" and "naughty" side. Sexually adventurous women will usually let you know upfront, as they do not really care about any societal judgement. Oftentimes one can do everything "right", but if a woman(or a man for that matter)is not interested in them, no matter if they happen to be stellar in the bedroom it is going to be utterly futile. If this women feels comfortable being sexually open with pr… | /r/seduction | 20/07/25 11:39 PM |
| 0 | 22m feeling emotionally connected but not sexually desired by 22F girlfriendIndeed, this woman is just not sexually attracted to him. She was more sexually opening previous relationships, debunking the entire premise that she is just afraid that she will will feel "judged" and not taken seriously by others. If she really felt that way, then why the heck was she more adventurous in her previous relationships then? The reality is that some individuals are just not meant to be together due to the lack of chemistry. OP is probably being taken advantage of, as the woman is s… | /r/seduction | 20/07/25 11:34 PM |
| 0 | 22m feeling emotionally connected but not sexually desired by 22F girlfriendThat is not actually correct, as OP mentioned his partner used to be way more sexual in her previous relationships than with him. Therefore, it has absolute nothing to do with her feeling "judged" if she becomes too sexually sexually open. She is just not sexually attracted to him and pretty much continues the relationship because she probably has no other options currently. In other words, she is settling for him and he is probably taken advanrage of. Nobody should be another person's second op… | /r/seduction | 20/07/25 11:22 PM |
| 0 | Guys with a lot of female friends — did you actively try to befriend women, or did it just happen? How did you go about building those friendships?There exists no credible scientific evidence whatsoever that most sexual relationships begin as friendships. Most of the studies show that friends rarely date each other. Most couples either meet through their immediate social circle, or at school/work. Especially with the rise of social media and dating websites/applications, more strangers meet and date than ever. All lovers started as strangers after all. P.S. That is not to state that friendships are not important. Far from it, but it is ti … | /r/seduction | 20/07/25 09:14 PM |
| 1 | School boys told being a man makes them a rapist…Then why those classes say nothing about "Toxic Femininity" and the fact that 50% of domestic violence victims are men? Or that most child abuse and infanticide cases are committed by women themselves? Those classes should have been a little bit more "objective", don't you think? Teaching individuals to spot female toxicity is definitely not on attack on women either. Yet you do you think we lack those important classes and lessons in the first place? | /r/MensRights | 16/07/25 10:20 AM |
| 1 | School boys told being a man makes them a rapist…Not actually true. Gender is a bigger predictor than race when it comes to sentencing disparities. In fact, White men still receive harsher penalties than White women for example. Also, globally, 1 in 3 women are not victims of domestic violence. The actual statistics according to massive meta-analysis of over 1.200 scientific studies published back in 2018, are closer to about 23% of women and roughly 20% of men. Keep in mind that a portion of those women are also Homosexuals as well. Furthermo… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/25 10:07 AM |
| 4 | 9 Ukrainian men paid €84k each in hopes to escape to Romania, but ended up getting caught and arrested near the Krasnoilsk checkpoint. Meanwhile, women are free to leave Ukraine when they pleaseWomen did lol. Polls show that more women support Vladimir Putin than men in Russia. Secondly, Ukraine is allowed to go to war with Russia primarily because of backing from the EU, which is led by a woman and also the previous Joe Biden Administration, an ardent "Feminist" with a female VP. The system was indeed created by women themselves and obviously not men. Hence why "Radical Feminazis" do not complain in the slightest as they tend to benefit from it. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/07/25 06:42 PM |
| 2 | Is objectification bad?Only if women did not commit half of all domestic and sexual violence, in addition to most instances of child abuse and infanticide according to various statistics. Then your statement might have made sense. It is actually men and children that should feel "afraid" of women than the other way around if anything. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/07/25 05:08 PM |
| 1 | Is objectification bad?Just to note, there is absolutely no scientific evidence whatsoever that men are supposedly more likely to "abandon" their female partners when they fall seriously ill. Those studies got debunked actually. Women are responsible for 70% of all divorces and they are significantly more likely to initiate one if their partners becomes unemployed or faced other struggles. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/07/25 05:02 PM |
| 1 | Is objectification bad?What a load of "Radical Feminist" bollocks. I have never once heard a man saying what you described, but on the contrary, I have heard plenty of women bragging they are gold-diggers, refer to men as "walking wallets" and even state that have children with "poor" men constitutes child abuse. And how are women treated as "baby machines" legally? Women still have reproductive rights in the vast majority of States and plenty of countries, whereas men still lack reproductive rights in pretty much eve… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/07/25 04:59 PM |
| 1 | The truth about domestic violenceThat is precisely what the link highlighted. In that domestic violence is reciprocal and not one directional and that both men and women experience it in equal proportions. Did you even pay any attention to that link at all? | /r/MensRights | 03/07/25 01:55 AM |
| 1 | Is your ex-wife better off after divorce?The claim that "men are more likely to leave their spouses if they happen to be terminally ill" has been debunked already: https://www.deseret.com/2015/8/4/20569426/study-that-found-husbands-prone-to-leave-sick-wives-was-flawed-researchers-say/ And secondly, women are more likely to initiate divorce if their husbands become unemployed. Indeed, there exist many selfish women out there that initiate divorce for the most ridiculous reasons ever possible. Including abandoning heir husbands in the mo… | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 05:48 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?Your wife, perhaps, also plans to divorce you. In addition to your own daughters when they get older. | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 04:56 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?It is also the same reason why you are divorced too lol. Since you brag that you are a "slob" and you think that women helping with cleaning is "Sexist". As it turns out, nobody likes "Sexist" individuals, regardless of gender! Who would have thought? | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 04:53 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?Nope, you are just blaming men for women choosing to initiate divorce. There are also many men that have been cheated on by their wives and even men that are victims of domestic violence Yet they still initiate divorce less when compared to women. Also, statistically speaking "irreconcilable differences" and "financial reasons" are the most common reasons for divorce. Indeed, judging by he statistics at least, there are indeed many women that initiate divorce for leave their partners for another… | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 04:40 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?What a load of misinformation and delusional conspiracy theories. First thigns first, married women actually tend to outlive their partners by about 2-3 years on average: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7452000/ Remember, there are always more widows than widowers for a reason! Also, nobody is forcing women to have less career opportunities while being married, but only themselves because they prefer to work fewer hours than their partners, or prefer not to work at all: https://ifstudie… | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 04:34 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?Statistically speaking, regardless of your "Radical Feminist" attestations, marriage is not more disadvantageous to women. Telling others to "Google the findings" does not constitute an argument. If you make a claim, the onus is actually on you to provide evidence for it. And since women have far more to lose when divorcing than men, they are more likely to engage in antidepressant use than divorced men: https://www.urbanhealthtoday.com/post/breakups-and-divorce-later-in-life-can-be-more-difficu… | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 04:25 PM |
| 2 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?Because such claims are mostly made by "Radical Feminists", that, statistically speaking, tend to be the most unhappy individuals out there. Not only are married women happier than married men, but divorced women also engage in higher antidepressant use than divorced men: https://www.urbanhealthtoday.com/post/breakups-and-divorce-later-in-life-can-be-more-difficult-for-women-mentally If women were actually happier while being single whereas men were supposedly happier while being married, you wo… | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 04:21 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?There exists zero scientific evidence for what you just stated. Not only are single women less happy than single men, married women are also happier than married men: https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-is-happiest-married-mothers-and-fathers-per-the-latest-general-social-survey And men do not initiate divorce more because they are afraid of losing custody of their own children. Make divorve and family laws more equal and see divorce rates amongst men skyrocket as a result. | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 04:17 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?There exists no scientific evidence for what you just stated. Statistically speaking, women do not experience higher levels of marital dissatisfaction. Married women are actually happier than married men, according to various scientific studies: https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-is-happiest-married-mothers-and-fathers-per-the-latest-general-social-survey Yet they still initiate 70% of all divorces. Also, it should be noted that divorce initiation is significantly more likely to occur if a woman is … | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 04:10 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?There is zero scientific evidence for what you just stated. Men, collectively speaking, earn more money thn awomen on average and also have more assets on average. Heck, even most female billionaires inherited their wealth either from their parents or through divorce. What you are saying is nothing more than utter bollocks. | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 03:54 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?So did Totalitarian "Atheist" Communist dictatorships, they all killed more than 100 million innocent individuals globally. Yet you still, erroneously, see yourselves as the "moral" ones. In spite of plenty of evidence to the contrary. | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 03:49 PM |
| 2 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?Same goes for women as well. If women want men to give them what they need, they also need to give them what they desire as well. Basically, do not be selfish and entitled and neither will he. | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 03:46 PM |
| 2 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?She is not a married woman. She is just another miserable "Radical Feminazi" that is probably single and alond. | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 03:40 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?Even more for women than it does for men: https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-is-happiest-married-mothers-and-fathers-per-the-latest-general-social-survey | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 03:38 PM |
| 1 | Why are women always so quick to advocate divorce?I definitely did Google that and all the articles that prove your unsubstantiated allegations utilise no scientific evidence whatsoever(solely anecdotal evidence)or come from biased sources. Statistically speaking, married women are not only happier than single women, they are also happier than marriedm men as well: https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-is-happiest-married-mothers-and-fathers-per-the-latest-general-social-survey Also, statistically speaking, divorced women are significantly more likely… | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 03:35 PM |
| 1 | According to study, “Women with divorced girlfriends are more likely to divorce themselves.”But the problem is that your ex would have divorced you even if she did not befriend said women. Your ex had various red-flags from the get go(per your own admission), that you ignored for a variety of reasons before you married her. The fact that she described them as "strong, divorced women" indicates that she was planning to divorce you as she was positively looking at the prospect of divorce. | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 03:11 PM |
| 1 | According to study, “Women with divorced girlfriends are more likely to divorce themselves.”Sure, but your ex's friend did not made her cheat on you. She decided to do it herself. What do friends have in common? A similar life philosophy and experiences. Your ex had all the red-flags present from the start that you ignored for a variety of reasons. The fact that she associated with a woman that bragged about cheating on her own partner tells you everything you need to know about her. She would have divorced you regardless if she was friends with that woman and whatnot. | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 02:56 PM |
| 1 | According to study, “Women with divorced girlfriends are more likely to divorce themselves.”Or more accurately, your ex was just toxic from the start and you just ignored all the red-flags present. It happens all the time, never forget the old adage of "birds of a feather, flock together". Why would anybody associate flat out toxic individuals, if they do not happen to be secretly toxic themselves? | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 02:48 PM |
| 1 | According to study, “Women with divorced girlfriends are more likely to divorce themselves.”Sure, but as you stated yourself, your ex wife was possibly undiagnosed with BPD. Which indicates there existed various red-flags in your marriage as well. Your marriage was not as secure as you thought it was. Something the scientific study above does miss, in that it does not take that correlatj68n does not equate causation into account. Their findings may have everything to do with the fact that individuals that are in toxic marriages and plan to divorce, may be more likely to associate with … | /r/Divorce_Men | 20/05/25 02:37 PM |
| 1 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.How is this "Misogynistic horseshit", when this is backed up by actual facts? Maybe, you are the "Misogynist" one because you refuse to hold women accountable as they are incapable of being biased or doing "bad" things. Maybe, they are made of glitter and spice after all. At least admit it, admit that all of you "Feminists" are secretly in favour of traditional gender norms. The ones that benefit you at least. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/25 05:36 AM |
| 1 | The rise in sex negative feminisms again: why?But women have not only been the victims of it for a long time. Scientific study after scientific study has shown left and right that most of the "slut-shaming" you complain about has been disproportionately done by women towards other women. Not men, not society, nobody else but women themselves: https://www.psypost.org/women-but-not-men-seek-to-actively-punish-sexualized-women-study-finds/ Furthermore, other scientific studies have also indicated that women are as likely to "slut-shame" men as… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 12/04/25 01:00 PM |
| 0 | Married teacher ‘begged teen boys to wear Scream masks for group sex’It definitely is as according to the Federal Government, up to 10% of children have experienced sexual abuse at the hands of teachers. And those are the ones that are willing to admit it, we are pretty much talking about millions of sexual abuse victims out there. There absolutely exists a teacher perpetrated sexual abuse problem in the United States. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/04/25 02:17 PM |
| 1 | Married teacher ‘begged teen boys to wear Scream masks for group sex’Nope, up to 10% of students have been sexually abused by a teacher according to the Federal Government. The number of children being sexually abused by pastors is significantly lower(even with the Catholic Church sexual abuse scandals we are looking at roughly 5.000 children globally). Similarly to the Hollywood sexual abuse scandals, there appears to be a weird culture of hypocritical "Secular Progressives" sexually abusing individuals left and right, but simoultaneously trying to deflect the i… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/04/25 02:14 PM |
| 0 | The 'Samurai' Strategy of Japanese Men Against Feminism Is Absurdly Bizarre – And It's Working!Your anecdotal evidene do not represent an entire country. How would you feel if something said the same about any other group of individuals such as Black people and Homosexuals? And no, there exists no culture of sexual harassment in Japan. The available statistics showcase that men are as likely to be victims of domestic and sexual violence as women are. As with every other nation of course. A pervert culture because of Hentai? You have never lived in Japan it appears. Japan is incredibly "Co… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/04/25 01:56 PM |
| 1 | Illinois Teacher Charged with Molesting Student Claims She Was Blackmailed by 15 Year-OldI mean, judging by how many moronic "Progressive" and "SJW Theocrats" we have(like the rapist quoted in the article and the "Feminazis" that support her)we are already living in a rapture. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/04/25 04:03 AM |
| 2 | Asking your husband to do as much chores as you when you are a SAHM is abuseAnd husband is the one doing all the working outside of the home. Why do you people always leave that important part out? A stay at home parent should be doing all the childcare, since that is their primary job to begin with. The sole exception is the weekends where the working partner is not working. But during the weekday, excepting the working partner to do childcare while you are staying at home all day, is compeltely unreasonable and in a way, overvaluing what you are doing and devaluing wh… | /r/Divorce_Men | 14/03/25 02:28 AM |
| 1 | Not attracted to women my own age…So called "creepiness" does not even exist. Consenting adults are allowed to date whoever they personally desire, irrespective of gender. Would you have the same mindset in regards to younger women that only prefer older men? Do they happen to be "creepy" as well in your mind, or do they get a pass? | /r/Divorce_Men | 13/03/25 10:53 PM |
| 5 | "Radical Feminist" financial services MasterCard reportedly cut a secret deal with Google to sell it's users personal information. Just more evidence that "Feminists" absolutely despise human rights.The exact same company has been indefinitely barred from ever operating in India as a result of various reported financial irregularities as well as privacy violations: https://tech.hindustantimes.com/amp/tech/news/mastercard-banned-by-rbi-from-issuing-new-cards-in-india-for-violating-data-storage-rules-71626329454812.html Hopefully, the new United States Federal Government rules targeting discriminatory policies in the name of "DEI" will force both MasterCard and Visa to abandon their hypocriti… | /r/MensRights | 01/03/25 12:31 PM |
| 1 | 'Teacher of the year' who confessed to raping two students, then sobbed in court to gain leniency, is facing 30 years to life in prisonWhy is it sexual assault when it happens to women but not to men though? You sound like a victim of "Feminist" porganada. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 23/02/25 11:04 PM |
| 18 | Can someone debunk the commonly repeated "Feminist" myths, on that supposedly "scientific" book?That is not what I stated. What I stated is that literally anyone can have a book become a bestseller these days. Even when it comes to controversial figures. Therefore, a book becoming a bestseller means nothing anymore, it does not have the same prestige that it used to. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/25 08:10 PM |
| 1 | Megan Huntsman concealed 7 pregnancies from her husband & killed each one as soon as it was born. She hid them all in the garage until he found them one day. She confessed she was on meth at the time & didn’t want the ‘responsibility’ of caring for a baby. She was sentenced to life.Forcing the taxpayers to pay for your abortions is completely wrong and cruel, especially when most Americans(including most women)completely disagree with that. What you do with your own body is your business, when you are forcing other people to pay for it, it becomes their business. Why can't you accept that little fact? If you support sensible abortion restrictions, then you would support banning after the first trimester, just like the rest of the civilised world does. Only 9 countries glob… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/01/25 03:07 PM |
| 1 | Megan Huntsman concealed 7 pregnancies from her husband & killed each one as soon as it was born. She hid them all in the garage until he found them one day. She confessed she was on meth at the time & didn’t want the ‘responsibility’ of caring for a baby. She was sentenced to life.It isn't, most late term abortions are actually elective, for no apparent reason whatsoever. And the government is subsidising them as well. Indeed, there are people out there waiting to have abortions just before their deliveries. They are waiting to have abortions all the way through their pregnancies. Abortions after the first trimester should be completely prohibited, just like the rest of the civilised world. Which is something the overwhelming majority of Americans(including "Pro-Choice" i… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/01/25 03:01 PM |
| 1 | Megan Huntsman concealed 7 pregnancies from her husband & killed each one as soon as it was born. She hid them all in the garage until he found them one day. She confessed she was on meth at the time & didn’t want the ‘responsibility’ of caring for a baby. She was sentenced to life.As long as the government is paying for it, others are allowed to have such opinions, however wrong they may be. You watch too much MSDNC. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/01/25 02:55 PM |
| 1 | Crying doesn't get woman out of taking responsibility for a car accidentNot a "Conservative" in the slightest, but "Conservative" women are not spewing constant "Misandry" and delusional conspiracy theories. Nor have I ever seen a "Conservative" woman falsely accusing men of things they never said or did, or getting their husbands to defend their so called "honour". Much of the "Misandry" both online and offline, is mostly spread by "Progressive" and "Feminist" women. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/01/25 02:40 PM |
| 10 | How accurate and "true" in this new video about New York being supposedly "unsafe" for women?Approaching individuals on the street is not akin to sexual harassment. How many freaking times do we have to point that out? If you feel "unsafe" having others approach you in a romantic manner, as long as it is done respectfully of course, you are the one with the problem actually. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/25 03:58 PM |
| 3 | How accurate and "true" in this new video about New York being supposedly "unsafe" for women?It indeed looked staged to myself as well, no different than that older video, also shot in New York: https://medium.com/message/that-catcalling-video-and-why-research-methods-is-such-an-exciting-topic-really-32223ac9c9e8 | /r/MensRights | 05/01/25 03:56 PM |
| 27 | How accurate and "true" in this new video about New York being supposedly "unsafe" for women?Not to mention that said video was deceptively edited shot in a single area, well most of the shots at least: https://medium.com/message/that-catcalling-video-and-why-research-methods-is-such-an-exciting-topic-really-32223ac9c9e8 They picked out one bad neighborhood and then falsely attempted to make it representative of the entirety of New York. | /r/MensRights | 05/01/25 03:55 PM |
| -1 | Former Dixon teacher accused of rape, sodomy, of at least two minorsRegardless of the State such incidents happen, you should also take into account that most teachers in the United States vote "Democrat". They are all a bunch of "Progressives" doing this, regardless of they State they reside in. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 05/01/25 08:28 AM |
| 1 | Hypocritical "Male Feminist" former President of Argentina, reported for domestic violence in addition to also being charged with corruption.I am obviously aware of that. In fact, it was Alberto Fernandez that created said governmental department. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/24 12:01 PM |
| 2 | Hypocritical "Male Feminist" former President of Argentina, reported for domestic violence in addition to also being charged with corruption.Which means? Apologies, but I do not speak Spanish. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/24 06:46 PM |
| 3 | Hypocritical "Male Feminist" former President of Argentina, reported for domestic violence in addition to also being charged with corruption.Let's hope the political opposition will eventually win the upcoming elections and eventually abolish the blatantly "Sexist" gender based violence law, which they have indicated a desire to convert it into a general family violence law. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/24 04:45 PM |
| 3 | Hypocritical "Male Feminist" former President of Argentina, reported for domestic violence in addition to also being charged with corruption.Indeed, this is the primary reason why I oppose such governmental departments as well personally. Although there exist countries out there where such departments are relatively "innocent"(such as in the case of the United Kingdom, where the Women's Ministry is also tasked with investigating discrimination against both genders). I mostly oppose such departments because they are completely "Misandrist", promote a particular political agenda and do not help actual women at all. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/24 04:42 PM |
| 27 | Hypocritical "Male Feminist" former President of Argentina, reported for domestic violence in addition to also being charged with corruption.This is the exact same troglodyte that ran political campaigns about being the first "Feminist" or the so called "Patriarchy" ends with him. He also created with openly "Sexist" Ministry Of Women, attempting to fight so called "gender based violence"(completely ignoring the fact that domestic violence is definitely NOT a "gendered" crime, with most scientific studies showing that men are as likely to be victims). Although said governmental department was widely criticised for being utterly usele… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/24 03:22 PM |
| 1 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernActually, you are wrong, Trump's tax plan might have shifted the tax burden from the recipient to the paying party in alimony cases, however, when one takes into account the overall lower tax burden on higher income individuals as a result of said law, the "penalty" is literally zero. Nothing has basically changed when compared to before: https://www.lawvlf.com/spousal-maintenance-under-the-trump-tax-law/ The money that one saved from their overall tax burden being reduced as a result of the tax… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/24 01:40 PM |
| 1 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernI do not necessarily believe that a University/College degree makes someone generally "smart", it could be that plenty of individuals with useless degrees such as Gender Studies openly backed said "Feminist" candidate. In direct contrast, the highest income households, the "productive class", voted for Democrats for the first time in decades, although they have been backing Republicans since pretty much forever: https://www.ft.com/content/6de668c7-64e9-4196-b2c5-9ceca966fe3f Secondly, the electo… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/24 01:32 PM |
| 0 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernAt least Republicans do not want preferential treatment being given to women via DEI initiatives, unlike Democrats. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/24 12:43 PM |
| 0 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernYet he did not put thousands of innocent individuals in prison for cheap labour. There is not even a comparison between the two. "Feminists" never actively believed or advocated for gender equality. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/24 11:34 AM |
| 1 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernLBJ might have been a "male President", but he was definitely a "Progressive" one at least. And no, "Feminists" have never pushed for a female registration of the draft, they actually abdicated against it back in the 1970's because "true gender equality" has never been achieved. And finally, a few years back, there existed a huge campaign called "draft our daughters", guess who opposed it? "Feminists" of course: https://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/02/04/two-republican-congressmen-introduce-… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/24 11:22 AM |
| 1 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernYou are not really "Pro-Choice" when you simultaneously support taxpayer funding of abortions. Where is really the "choice" in that? A lot of "Progressives" cannot see their inherent hypocrisy on said statements. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/24 10:45 AM |
| 1 | Kamala Harris is clueless about the situation of half of the people she plans to gouvernThen how come it is "Blue States" that have the highest poverty and homelessness rates? We both know it is not really about being "Pro-Choice" when at the same time taxpayers funding of abortions or things like mandatory vaccinations are supported. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/24 10:42 AM |
| 1 | Can someone offer counter-evidence against the WHO claim that 1 in 3 women are victims of domestic and sexual violence?Do the above data only include non partner related sexual violence, or is partnered sexual violence also included in the aforementioned statistics? Another massive metanalysis published back in 2014, analysing a whopping of 7.231 scientific studies, concluded the average rate of non partnered sexual violence sits at around 7.2%(including Western countries as well): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673613622436 | /r/MensRights | 23/11/24 06:23 PM |
| 0 | Can someone offer evidence that debunks the "Feminist" claim the election of more female politicians, is linked to better governance, lower poverty rates and less war?The current government of the United Kingdom has stated support for such an act(e.g equating "Misogyny" with terrorism)but have not to, my knowledge at least, introduced such changes to the law still. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/24 01:56 AM |
| -2 | Can someone offer evidence that debunks the "Feminist" claim the election of more female politicians, is linked to better governance, lower poverty rates and less war?In addition to claims that the election of more female politicians leads to greater awareness of women's rights through legislation, more gender equality and politg8ans being more sensitive to women's concerns. Assertions made in the following article: https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2023/09/indias-new-gender-quota-law-is-a-win-for-womenmostly?lang=en | /r/MensRights | 16/11/24 08:19 PM |
| 1 | No, "Feminism" is actually not as prevalent and as influential as you might think.I do not support "Feminism", that is the primary reason why I posted this here in the first place. What I wanted to convey is the apparent decline in the influence of "Feminism", that is all. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/24 05:36 PM |
| 1 | No, "Feminism" is actually not as prevalent and as influential as you might think.How come my shared posts do not "back up" my claims exactly? | /r/MensRights | 10/11/24 05:35 PM |
| 3 | Can someone debunk this "Feminist" report, claiming that when women allege domestic violence, they are actually more likely to lose their child custody cases?It should also be noted that a recent scienturic study came to the exact opposite conclusions, finding that women that allege abuse are not more likely to lose child custody: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923003833 | /r/MensRights | 09/11/24 08:32 PM |
| 18 | Can someone debunk this "Feminist" report, claiming that when women allege domestic violence, they are actually more likely to lose their child custody cases?It should also be noted that a recent scienturic study came to the exact opposite conclusions, finding that women that allege abuse are not more likely to lose child custody: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740923003833 | /r/MensRights | 09/11/24 08:32 PM |
| 2 | Alimony should be abolishedWomen are certainly not the majority of breadwinners accordingto Pew Research Center. In fact, just 16% of all families are currently headed by a female breadwinner. Needless to say, alimony should not exist for either gender. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/24 10:21 AM |
| 1 | "Feminists" claim that, apparently, women do better in single sex educational environments and that boys schools, allegedly, give birth to a culture of "Hypermaculinity".While rape is indeed a "gendered" crime in the United Kingdom, official figures from the British government indicates that women that commit sexual assault against men can still be liable for a life sentence. Now, whether they will eventually receive one is simply the responsibility for the judges at hand. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/24 09:01 AM |
| 6 | "Feminists" claim that, apparently, women do better in single sex educational environments and that boys schools, allegedly, give birth to a culture of "Hypermaculinity".I mean, they even included evidence from the Australian government that evidence to support the "superiority" of either model is inconclusive at best. Yet they still tried to twist and go against the offical statistics they cited. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/24 09:01 AM |
| 6 | "Feminists" claim that, apparently, women do better in single sex educational environments and that boys schools, allegedly, give birth to a culture of "Hypermaculinity".I mean, they even included evidence from the Australian government that evidence to support the "superiority" of either model is inconclusive at best. Yet they still tried to twist and go against the offical statistics they cited. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/24 09:01 AM |
| 7 | "Feminists" claim that, apparently, women do better in single sex educational environments and that boys schools, allegedly, give birth to a culture of "Hypermaculinity".I mean, they even included evidence from the Australian government that evidence to support the "superiority" of either model is inconclusive at best. Yet they still tried to twist and go against the offical statistics they cited. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/24 09:00 AM |
| 1 | "Feminists" claim that, apparently, women do better in single sex educational environments and that boys schools, allegedly, give birth to a culture of "Hypermaculinity".Well, there are reports that affirmative action primarily benefits men, because Universities/Colleges are desperately trying to recruit men as a result of falling attendance rates. However, that should bother those that favour affirmative action and if it does because in some ways it apparently benefits men, that simply exposes their rampant hypocrisy. Personally, I am against affirmative action regardless of gender and the reason it is being implemented. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/24 08:54 AM |
| 5 | "Feminists" claim that, apparently, women do better in single sex educational environments and that boys schools, allegedly, give birth to a culture of "Hypermaculinity".Indeed, however they never made that argument in their article. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/24 08:50 AM |
| 1 | Can someone offer a rebuttal to the "Feminist" claim that women are significantly more likely to be afraid of rape and this somehow proves that women are disproportionately impacted by it?First things first, men are more likely to underreport sexual violence, which is something that is already noted in the relevant CDC surveys. Secondly, recent scientific studies have concluded that sexual violence rates are nearly equivalent between men and women: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ And secondly, that statistic about high prevalence of sexual violence among women has also been challenged by researchers as well: http… | /r/MensRights | 04/11/24 05:18 PM |
| 1 | Can someone offer a rebuttal to the "Feminist" claim that women are significantly more likely to be afraid of rape and this somehow proves that women are disproportionately impacted by it?This is exactly what I have been personally researching, appreciate your rather informative comment! | /r/MensRights | 04/11/24 05:12 PM |
| 1 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".In both Finland and Iceland, the proposals to prohibit infant male circumcision were scrapped after force protests by "Ultra-Orthodox" Jews: https://www.timesofisrael.com/proposal-to-ban-male-circumcision-scrapped-from-finland-bill/ if one wants to blame anybody, it is essentially them. And in regards to shared custody legislation, while it is indeed correct to state the NOW is advocating against them, they have not necessarily been very successful in killing such bills. They failed in Kentucky … | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 11:53 PM |
| 2 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".But you are completely missing the premise of the survey above. "Feminists" were not necessarily more likely to view men and women as "equal", they were simply more likely to view them as "similar" when compared to non "Feminists". However, by simply acknowledging that differences between men and women exist, does not necessarily imply that one does not view men and women as "equal". And by denying they exist may simply be the desire of "Feminists" to dismantle gender expectations and norms they… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 11:35 PM |
| 2 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".But said individuals are still Racist and Islamophobic, that is the issue at stake here. They may not necessarily admit they are discriminating against such groups, but they still feel an elevated level of fear around them. Which has absolutely nothing to do with "conditioning", if they have never once been vicitmised by the aforementioned groups, how come they have been "conditioned" to be afraid of them? There is subtle bigotry here that many are simply unwilling to admit, similarly to "White-… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 11:25 PM |
| 5 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".Precisely, such a rather unconventional way to conduct research, innit? | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 06:34 PM |
| 3 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".Another excellent addition to the current discussion! | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 06:33 PM |
| 4 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".The entire field of Social Psychology is incredibly biased unfortunately. With plenty of scientific studies failing to replicate, which means their results cannot he generalised to populations at large. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 06:32 PM |
| 7 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".While I am obviously not an academic myself, I am pleased to see my rather lay assumptions vindicated and validated by someone that obviously knows better. Incredibly informative comment, appreciate for sharing it! | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 06:31 PM |
| 13 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".The entire field of Social Psychology is incredibly biased unfortunately. With plenty of scientific studies failing to replicate, which means their results cannot he generalised to populations at large. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 06:23 PM |
| 11 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".The entire field of Social Psychology is incredibly biased unfortunately. With plenty of scientific studies failing to replicate, which means their results cannot he generalised to populations at large. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 06:23 PM |
| 3 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".The entire field of Social Psychology is incredibly biased unfortunately. With plenty of scientific studies failing to replicate, which means their results cannot he generalised to populations at large. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 06:23 PM |
| 6 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".I actually included the report on my post as well, but in case you have not noticed, here you go: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843231202708 Also, the problem with your assertion is the same arguments can be utilised to excuse "Incels" and "Misogynists" as well, since many of them have also been "wronged" by women too. Not every individual that hates the opposite sex, race and so on has had negative experiences that lead them to take up the arms of social activism. Sometimes peop… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 06:15 PM |
| 1 | A recent scientific study conducted by "Feminist" researchers, utilising non nationally representative convenience samples, concludes that "Feminists" do not actually hate men, even though they are significantly more likely to perceive men as a "threat".Well, this is how we engage in and conduct productive conversations in the end. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/24 01:25 PM |
| 1 | UK: Pianist who stabbed her boyfriend in the groin before dousing him in bleach after he refused sex is jailed for seven years, OP: She falsely claimed sexual assault.To be fair, that is in he United States, where penalties are much more severe. The United Kingdom criminal justice system is a joke in comparison for all crimes. | /r/MensRights | 16/10/24 02:15 AM |
| 1 | Are men systematically discriminated against in child custody disputes?While everything that you stated is indeed correct, I would like to highlight that upwards of 71% of children in the United States live with two married parents andnot 43% of children as your source erroneously claimed: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-resurgence-of-the-two-parent-family Just 25% of all children in the United States currently live in fatherless households. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/24 05:37 AM |
| 1 | Are men systematically discriminated against in child custody disputes?You were literally offered credible evidence by another commenter above you, in that even when men fight for custody, they still lose. Therefore it should be inferred that men do not necessarily lose custody of their own children because of their lack of trying, but simply because of the inherent bias in the family court system: https://wakespace.lib.wfu.edu/bitstream/handle/10339/26167/Back%20to%20the%20Future%20%20An%20Empirical%20Study%20of%20Child%20Custody%20Outcomes%20%20(SSRN).pdf | /r/MensRights | 08/10/24 05:28 AM |
| 1 | Are men systematically discriminated against in child custody disputes?To be fair, another more scientific experiment showed the exact opposite is actually the case. In fact, judges are actually more biased than non judges in regards to how they award custody: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180419141541.htm Laypersons are, generally speaking, much less susceptible to "Feminist" talking points and "Misandry". | /r/MensRights | 08/10/24 04:50 AM |
| 3 | It’s wild how normalised the hate is.Well of course, it should not surprise anyone that "Femcels" are losers and sexual failures lol. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/24 05:40 PM |
| 37 | It’s wild how normalised the hate is.And the exact same Femcels complain they cannot find a man. The avaibale statistics speak for themselves, most "Feminazis" in the United States are childless and they have a lower birth rate om average. They were just eradicating their kind and for a good reason. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/24 05:35 PM |
| 20 | "Radical Feminazi" Nickelodeon and Disney hypocrisy on lecturing the rest of us on so called "female empowerment" and "Rape Culture", yet they are full of rampant sexual abuse themselves. At least 35 Disney employees apprehended for sex crimes at this point.Yet then here come "Feminazi" blowhards such as Jodie Foster, laughably asserting that every man plays their own part in a culture that supposedly normalises sexual violence: https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2017/12/22/jodie-foster-every-man-part-sex-misconuduct/ In all actuality however, the above brave issue is certainly not a "male problem", but a "Male Feminist" problem more accurately. The same individuals that lecture the rest of society on "Rape Culture", are the same ones that tur… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/24 08:35 PM |
| 1 | Get citizenship in another country to avoid Alimony and CS?Michigan is a "Liberal" State. You definitely have no idea... | /r/Divorce_Men | 22/09/24 05:09 AM |
| 1 | Get citizenship in another country to avoid Alimony and CS?Nope, this is absolutely a "Radical Feminazi" issue. No deeply "Conservative" State has child support up until 26. Just like out of the 6 States with permanent alimony, 4 of them are "Liberal". When Florida abolished permanent alimony, "Radical Feminazis" went completely crazy of it. Indeed, this is definitely a "Feminazi" issue as I have stated before. | /r/Divorce_Men | 22/09/24 05:08 AM |
| 2 | Get citizenship in another country to avoid Alimony and CS?Maybe if such "Sexist" and discriminatory laws did not exist, your father and other so called "bums" would have worked instead? Nobody should be entitled to alimony, it is the 21st century already. The only loser bums are the women that want to depend fiancially on their partners. Where is the whole "strong, independent woman" mentality then? | /r/Divorce_Men | 22/09/24 04:58 AM |
| 7 | Ultimate Blackpill: In deaf-hearing married couples women are almost 3 times more likely to be the deaf individualBut women were also allowed to choose back then as well. Do you really believe that poor men get to experience marriage back then? Of course not. The woman was the final selector, with input from her family of course. And while plenty of feel choose to stay alone, the current available statistics show that over 60% of women are in relationships. About 50% of men are partnered as well. So we get a discrepancy of 10%. Something tells me you are just another delusional "Feminist" that does not know… | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/09/24 04:18 AM |
| 3 | Ultimate Blackpill: In deaf-hearing married couples women are almost 3 times more likely to be the deaf individualIn both of such countries such programs have been discontinued? | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/09/24 04:10 AM |
| 3 | How the Theocratic and Fascist, "Radical Feminazis" tried to(unsuccessfully of course)cancel "Nu Metal" back in the 1990's/2000's.Instead of suppressing he stream of "Nu Metal", the demonisation by the "Radical Feminazis" as well as the "Far-Left" journalists had the exact opposite effect. Limp Bizkit alone sold more than 50 million album copies globally for example. Putting the blame on "Nu Metal" and the overall popular culture for encouraging the various "angry white men" for committing violence and destruction is also another laughable accusation. In the context of the Woodstock 1999 festival fiasco, of over 220000 ind… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/24 02:36 PM |
| 4 | Honest advice:Be careful about women that have no desire to cultivate male friendships and acquaintances(especially outside of romantic contexts).You still have non romantic male influences in your life. My post referred to women that specifically choose you exclude men altogether, unless we are referring to a non romantic context. Honestly, how would you feel it a man you were interested in decides to completely exclude all women from his life, expecting romantic interests? Not even a single female acquaintance on top of it. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/24 08:32 PM |
| 1 | Requesting credible scientific studies debunking the "Feminist" assertion the criminal justice system is supposedly biased against victims of sexual violence.All of the biased scientific studies that you posted are countered by the actual evidence. That not only are men significantly more likely to be apprehended for the exact same crimes when compared to women, but women are also significantly more likely to be believed when reporting domestic and sexual violence, with male perpetrators being punished more severely. All of the aforementioned statistics are freely available(I can share them in case of a request), therefore discrediting all of the pap… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/24 07:33 PM |
| 1 | Requesting credible scientific studies debunking the "Feminist" assertion the criminal justice system is supposedly biased against victims of sexual violence.I do not necessarily disagree with such notions, however that 42% of individuals experiencing domestic violence is abysmally high. Most of the scientific studies put the number closer to 22%, indeed one of the largest metanalysis of domestic violence research published back in 2018 analyzing over 1.700 scientific studies in over 73 nations put the overall number at 22% as well. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/24 07:25 PM |
| 3 | Honest advice:Be careful about women that have no desire to cultivate male friendships and acquaintances(especially outside of romantic contexts).Then your personal issue is not with men or women, but with the type of people you decide to surround yourself with. What kinds of horrible experiences, if I may ask? Hopefully it is not something serious. My comment in regards to "sexual objectification" is more along the lines of someone that perceives the opposite sex only in a romantic manner, while being incapable to associate with them in a non-romantic context is definitely treatingthem as nothing more than "sex objects". Why would someon… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/24 06:34 PM |
| 9 | Honest advice:Be careful about women that have no desire to cultivate male friendships and acquaintances(especially outside of romantic contexts).Of course, a friendship needs to be based on authenticity and genuine intentions, not manipulation! | /r/MensRights | 13/05/24 06:30 PM |
| 6 | Honest advice:Be careful about women that have no desire to cultivate male friendships and acquaintances(especially outside of romantic contexts).Sounds like you picked some horrible friends then. Personally, I have lots of female friends(much like male ones)and they are been more than happy to pitch in times of need. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/24 06:29 PM |
| 14 | Honest advice:Be careful about women that have no desire to cultivate male friendships and acquaintances(especially outside of romantic contexts).Absolutely, avoid such individuals altogether! I would also like to highlight announcements such as "you are the one of the good ones". Notice that "Radical Feminists" scoff when some men say things like "you are not like the other girls", replying with rebuttals such as "what is wrong with the other girls"? But when some women say the above it is somehow acceptable? Give me a break. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/24 06:27 PM |
| 9 | Honest advice:Be careful about women that have no desire to cultivate male friendships and acquaintances(especially outside of romantic contexts).It is indeed possible, as long as sexual attraction is not present. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/24 06:24 PM |
| 1 | Feminist author Kate Lister uses feminist statistics and feminist logic to calculate that bears are safer to be around than menFirst things first, men are disproportionately the victims of homicide, upwards of 79% that is. Secondly, so called "sex related homicides" do not even exist, as the term "genocide" is a pseudoscientific "Feminist" term with no basis in reality. There exists zero scientific evidence that "Sexism" is behind the overwhelming majority of domestic violence related homicide. Indeed, most men end up murdering women also have a centralized history of violence, oftentimes against other men. Domestic vio… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 12:35 PM |
| 1 | What can the largest database of domestic violence research tell us?You are the one that apparently did not, I am posting the official statistics straight out of the Federal Government, which certainly makes them more accurately obviously. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 12:24 PM |
| 1 | The whole bear situation reminded me why I don’t ever want to date againConsidering that men are as likely to be victims of domestic and sexual violence as men are: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography Going by the same rationale, shouldn't men also be scared and afraid of women as a result of their own experience? You are not actually concerned wit… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 11:52 AM |
| 1 | The whole bear situation reminded me why I don’t ever want to date againConsidering that men are as likely to be victims of domestic and sexual violence as men are: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography Going by the same rationale, shouldn't men also be scared and afraid of women as a result of their own experience? | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 11:51 AM |
| 1 | The whole bear situation reminded me why I don’t ever want to date againI highly doubt that, you sound exactly like the "I am not racist, I have Black friends" type of individual. I am pretty convinced you have no relationships with men in real life, you are basically a Femcel at this point. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 11:46 AM |
| 1 | The whole bear situation reminded me why I don’t ever want to date againConsidering that men are as likely to be victims of domestic and sexual violence as men are: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography Going by the same rationale, shouldn't men also be scared and afraid of women as a result of their own experience? | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 11:41 AM |
| -1 | The whole bear situation reminded me why I don’t ever want to date againProbably terminally online Femcels. Honestly, have you ever encountered even one of them in real life? | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 07:30 AM |
| 2 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.First things first, while it is absolutely correct the overwhelming majority of perpetrators of violent crime happen to be men, their victims also happen to be primarily other men: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1388777/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-gender/ The overwhelming majority of such men are also the products of single mother household themselves: https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/divorce-child-custody-blog/single-mother-home-statistics/ Also, men vastly underreport sexual victimisation,… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 06:53 AM |
| 3 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.If a man assumed wrongly that a woman has nefarious intentions he hurts her feelings. But if he guesses wrong and thinks she has innocent motives when she doesn't, he is sexually abused if he is a student or murdered if he happens to be her parent: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13326161/Cougars-classroom-alarming-rate-teachers-charged-raping-young-boys-America.html https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/02/philosophy-student-alice-wood-jailed-18-years-running-over-fiance-car So … | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 06:16 AM |
| 2 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.Going by your own rationale, why aren't you infuriated with female teachers sexually abusing boys giving women a terrible reputation in general and parents the fear of placing their children in their vicinity at school? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13326161/Cougars-classroom-alarming-rate-teachers-charged-raping-young-boys-America.html | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 06:08 AM |
| 1 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.Which did you marry a "Feminist" to begin with? | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 06:04 AM |
| 1 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.Honestly, the "in group" bias usually pertains to "Benevolent Sexism", which is women usually favouring other women because they perceive them as more nurturing or whatever. Basically alongside gender stereotypes. This does not mean that women are not competitive with each other however, in fact, women are significantly more competitive with each other than other men for that matter: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-31816-0 Also, the "women's fear of crime" is also completely irrationa… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 05:59 AM |
| 1 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.The vast majority of "Feminist Fundamentalists" perhaps, not women. They do not represent all women of course and I say this as an individual against sexbots myself. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 05:47 AM |
| 1 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.Of course your wife has irrational and unsubstantiated fears, because she was probably raised by a "Feminist Fundamentalist" mother herself. The real reason in here is why the heck did you marry her in the first place? | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 05:38 AM |
| 1 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.Then how come are "Progressive" and "Secular" individuals the groups that are the most likely to experience domestic violence? https://ifstudies.org/blog/evangelicals-and-domestic-violence-are-christian-men-more-abusive Granted, the overwhelming majority of women definitely do not "cover up", most women dress in a rather provocative manner so to speak(and there is obviously nothing wrong with that by the way). Whereas most men are armed to the teeth with firearms, because they make up disproport… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 05:17 AM |
| 1 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.But the statistics do not actually suggest that, in fact, men are as likely to be raped as women are. Men are also significantly more likely to be convicted of rape than women are: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ Therefore, it absolutely makes sense for men to be scared and afraid of women as well, going by your own rationale of course. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/24 05:06 AM |
| 2 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.I guess the woman that you know is either a delusional "Feminist" or single and alone. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 10:01 PM |
| 1 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.It is not even 1 in 3, but more akin to 1 in 6 to be honest. https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence Including 1 in 6 men: https://1in6.org/statistic/ | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 09:40 PM |
| 1 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.It is actually not 1 in 4 women, but more akin to 1 in 6: https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence Men are also significantly more likely to underreport sexual violence: https://1in6.org/statistic/ According to other scientific studies, men are as likely to be victims of sexual violence as women are: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 09:20 PM |
| 2 | The "Bear or man" question has made me lose faith in humanity.Because you know "Feminazis" perhaps. Most of my friends said a man obviously. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 09:02 PM |
| 2 | man or bear who you choose ?She erroneously claims she does not hate men, yet her account got suspended probably because she violated the rules by making bigoted comments. Judging by how many women rape men(including other women as well), someone should be much more afraid of what a woman would possibly do to them than a man: https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/04/male-rape-in-america-a-new-study-reveals-that-men-are-sexually-assaulted-almost-as-often-as-women.html Going by their rationale of course. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 08:54 PM |
| 2 | man or bear who you choose ?Yet according to the relevant statistics, men constitute the overwhelming majority of homicide victims: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1388777/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-gender/ Such serial killers mostly end up murdering other men and guess who raised all of those serial killers? https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/divorce-child-custody-blog/single-mother-home-statistics/ | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 08:46 PM |
| 1 | man or bear who you choose ?Sure, I definitely believe you. It is always the bitter, hateful and single "Feminist Fundamentalists" having such unsubstantiated and irrational opinions. Not a coincidence I have to attest. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 08:10 PM |
| 1 | man or bear who you choose ?According to "RAINN", about 1 in 6 women will be victims of sexual assault in their lifetime. With rates of sexual violence decreasing by more than 50% in the past couple of decades. Just "Feminist" pseudostatistics as always. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 08:04 PM |
| 1 | man or bear who you choose ?1 in 6 women will be victims of sexual assault in their lifetime according to "RAINN" and not 1 in 3. About 1 in 6 men will also be sexually victimised by women as well: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ So going by your own rationale, wouldn't there also be a statistically valid fear for men to be scared and afraid of women as well? And most sexual violence incidents are committed by a very small portion of both men and women tha… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 07:57 PM |
| 3 | man or bear who you choose ?And most of those are bitter, hateful "Feminist Fundamentalists", that are probably single and alone. Let them be scared and afraid of men then and let the rest of men meet the real women that love and honour them. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 07:53 PM |
| 2 | man or bear who you choose ?Honest question, going by your rationale, would you really feel comfortable leaving your son(or your daughter for that matter)alone in school with a female teacher ? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13326161/Cougars-classroom-alarming-rate-teachers-charged-raping-young-boys-America.html Only honest answers please. | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 07:52 PM |
| 2 | man or bear who you choose ?Do you realise that a significant portion of the individuals currently placed on the sex offenders registry are either juveniles convicted of having sexual relations with other juveniles: https://jlc.org/news/most-states-require-some-youth-be-sex-offender-registries Not to mention that most of them are also low risk: https://www.yahoo.com/news/experts-say-sex-offender-registries-dont-work-can-they-be-fixed-215957631.html Because a significant portion of individuals on the sex offenders registry … | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 07:21 PM |
| 1 | man or bear who you choose ?You literally shared a story that occurred more than 16 years ago, anything more recent? You also erroneously stated the murderer targeted her because she happen to be a woman, even though this was not even mentioned in the article and it is possibly he perpetrated the offence because he wanted her credit card(ergo a robbery). You also highlighted, that your tiny rural county has about 125 registered sex offenders, how many individuals reside in your county exactly? Possibly thousands(not to men… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 06:48 PM |
| 1 | man or bear who you choose ?Yet there is 168.000.000 women in the United States, where they also come in contact with more than 160.000.000 men as well and not just 75.000.000 as you erroneously stated yourself. Yet, the overwhelming majority of women will never be victims of domestic and sexual violence(similarly to men), even though they come in contact with millions of men daily. A single encounter with a bear can provide nearly fatal though, even though most will almost never come in contact with one. Finally, men are … | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 06:12 PM |
| 1 | man or bear who you choose ?You don't think that at women are dangerous to men? You don't think the fact that most men will suffer violence at some point in their life a terrible thing? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236245485_Prevalence_of_Physical_Violence_in_Intimate_Relationships_Part_1_Rates_of_Male_and_Female_Victimization https://www.researchgate.net/… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 06:01 PM |
| 2 | man or bear who you choose ?First things first, both domestic and sexual violence rates have decreased precipitously in the past couple of decades. Secondly, there exist 168.000.000 women in the United States, where most of then come in contact with millions of men daily. Yet, the overwhelming majority of them will never be victims of either domestic and sexual violence. Secondly, according various scientific studies, men are as likely to be victims of domestic and sexual violence as women are: https://www.researchgate.net… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 05:50 PM |
| 1 | In the spirit of the man vs. bear questionBut most of such individuals have not had terrible experiences with men, so their opinions are completely unsubstantiated and irrational. And men are significantly more likely to be victims of sexual violence perpetrated by women than other men according to various scientific studies: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ The idea that men are mostly sexually abused by other men is nothing more than a "Femimist Fundamentalist" delusio… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 05:21 PM |
| 1 | In the spirit of the man vs. bear questionIf women are so scared and afraid to leave their house alone at night, because they are victimised to such an extent, or being offered such advice by everyone they need to be "aware". Then how come are women significantly more likely to travel when compared to men, especially alone, in remote parts of the world? How come 86% fo women assert they are not scared and afraid to travel then? https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelgoldstein/2024/02/22/women-love-to-travel-men-not-so-much/?sh=58d370da5f1c… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 04:58 PM |
| 1 | In the spirit of the man vs. bear questionJust from the past two weeks: https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/alissa-mccommon-tennessee-teacher-accused-sexually-assaulting-minors https://www.local10.com/news/local/2024/03/14/broward-middle-school-teacher-arrested-for-inappropriate-contact-with-student/ https://www.ibtimes.sg/north-carolina-school-counselor-accused-having-sexual-relationship-student-planned-leave-73975 https://toronto.citynews.ca/2024/03/04/woman-37-tried-to-arrange-sexual-offences-against-young-child-durham-police/ https://w… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 04:21 PM |
| 1 | In the spirit of the man vs. bear questionThere exist tons of stories of men being the victims of sexual violence by female predators, more than I can count for that matter: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13326161/Cougars-classroom-alarming-rate-teachers-charged-raping-young-boys-America.html I am also aware of several one in my intermediate circle, my father has been sexually harassed three times already by women and counting. … | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 04:05 PM |
| 2 | In the spirit of the man vs. bear questionAn honest question, going by your rationale, would you really be comfortable leaving your son(or your daughter for that matter)alone in a school with a female teacher? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13326161/Cougars-classroom-alarming-rate-teachers-charged-raping-young-boys-America.html | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 03:50 PM |
| 2 | In the spirit of the man vs. bear questionAn honest question, going by your rationale, would you really be comfortable leaving your son(or your daughter for that matter)alone in a school with a female teacher? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13326161/Cougars-classroom-alarming-rate-teachers-charged-raping-young-boys-America.html Similarly, not only men are disproportionately the victims of violent crime, they are even less likely to be believed if they happen to be the victims of domestic and sexual violence when compared to wo… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 03:49 PM |
| 1 | In the spirit of the man vs. bear questionAre you even aware that both television and Hollywood are fiction are obviously not supposed to represent reality? Should we be afraid of women as well because of the countless of movies featuring female serial killers? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 03:33 PM |
| 1 | Man vs Bear TrendWhat does said post entail about it exactly? | /r/MensRights | 04/05/24 03:26 PM |
| 1 | What can the largest database of domestic violence research tell us?Actually, there is literally no evidence that easier access to firearms is the primary culprit for suicides. In fact, according to the CDC, suicide rates when comparing "Blue States" and "Red States" are actually mixed: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/suicide-mortality/suicide.htm | /r/MensRights | 03/05/24 01:17 PM |
| 2 | What can the largest database of domestic violence research tell us?Just nothing more than pseudoscientific "Feminist" nonsense that has actually been debunked by more recent scientific studies: https://www.news.com.au/national/crime/they-are-calculating-what-makes-women-kill-their-partners/news-story/e5e6a97cc432c0f79363917471b78791 https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/women-rarely-gave-a-warning-before-killing-their-mates-and-most-didnt-suffer-abuse-study-finds Also, police investigators only attribute 10% of all homicides perpetrated by women as a result of s… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/24 01:04 PM |
| 42 | Some "Feminists" assert that various women's health conditions such as Endometriosis and pain are supposedly dismissed by the medical establishment because of "Sexism".It is also laughable and incredibly ironic they allege that women's health issues are supposedly being dismissed because they do not partian to men's concerns m, when men's mental health issues are routinely being dismissed by the medical establishment, to the point of some men receiving inadequate assistance for mental health leading to tragic consequences such as suicide. Welcome to the club I guess. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/24 07:25 PM |
| 1 | Statistics Regarding False Rape Accusations are Misleading and DangerousIn the overwhelming majority of instances of sexual violence, alcohol is the most often utilised substance: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21183264/ Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of sex offenders obviously do not desire to be identified, therefore they would never share incriminating evidence of their crimes in the form of videos eventually ending up on the internet where they could be easily identified by their victims. One anecdotal example does not really offer conclusive proof to y… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/24 01:22 PM |
| 32 | "Radical Feminazis" assert that when women murder their partners, they do so as a result of a diminished social support system from their families or in self-defence. Care to debunk such nonsense?I stumbled upon a scientific study conducted in Finland that found zero evidence that when women commit homicide against intimate partners, they do so in self-defence: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379073803000689 Keep the additional scientific studies coming! | /r/MensRights | 12/04/24 07:33 AM |
| 10 | "Radical Feminazis" assert that when women murder their partners, they do so as a result of a diminished social support system from their families or in self-defence. Care to debunk such nonsense?I stumbled upon a scientific study conducted in Finland that found zero evidence that when women commit homicide against intimate partners, they do so in self-defence: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379073803000689 Keep the additional scientific studies coming! | /r/MensRights | 12/04/24 07:33 AM |
| 8 | "Radical Feminazis" assert that when women murder their partners, they do so as a result of a diminished social support system from their families or in self-defence. Care to debunk such nonsense?Globally, just 26 countries utilise the "Duluth Model", out of more than 200 existing nations and territories: https://www.mprnews.org/story/2010/10/21/duluth-treatment-model Heck, even the United Kingdom has abandoned the much maligned "Duluth Model" as of recently, in favour of alternative interventions: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315953568_Lessons_from_the_Integrated_Domestic_Abuse_Programme_for_the_implementation_of_Building_Better_Relationships | /r/MensRights | 12/04/24 05:58 AM |
| 14 | "Radical Feminazis" assert that when women murder their partners, they do so as a result of a diminished social support system from their families or in self-defence. Care to debunk such nonsense?The scientific study above noted that incarcerated women supposedly score lower on "Psychopathy" when compared to men, in spite of various scientist studies indicating that "Psychopathy" is as common in women(incarnated or not)as it is in men: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20445838/ https://neurosciencenews.com/female-psychopathy-psychology-25669/ Furthermore, a massive global scientific study also underlined that "Psychopathy" is the strongest predictor of domestic violence and obviously not … | /r/MensRights | 12/04/24 05:14 AM |
| 1 | Requesting scientific studies debunking the "Feminist" narrative that men who murder women somehow come from more "conventional" backgrounds and supposedly differ from men who murder other men.I am aware of such statistics myself, I simply requested on whether anyone could offer additional scientific studies on whether men who murder women somehow differ from men who murder other men. In regards to demographic factors, substance abuse rates, contact with the criminal justice system and so on. The "Feminist" narrative asserts that men who murder women are less likely to have an extensive criminal record as well as a substance abuse history, therefore their profile is supposedly "differ… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/24 06:27 PM |
| 1 | Requesting scientific studies debunking the "Feminist" narrative that men who murder women somehow come from more "conventional" backgrounds and supposedly differ from men who murder other men.I am aware of such statistics myself, I simply requested on whether anyone could offer additional scientific studies on whether men who murder women somehow differ from men who murder other men. In regards to demographic factors, substance abuse rates, contact with the criminal justice system and so on. The "Feminist" narrative asserts that men who murder women are less likely to have an extensive criminal record as well as a substance abuse history, therefore their profile is supposedly "differ… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/24 06:27 PM |
| 3 | Landmark scientific study concludes that sex offenders are characterised by high degrees of "criminal versatility", meaning they commit a wide variety of offences, not just solely targeting women. In fact, they were found to commit even more non sexual offences than sexual ones.Indeed, another scientific study also mentioned the majority of sex offenders have experienced adverse childhood experiences in addition to engaging in multiple other criminal activities such as illicit drug selling and substance abuse: https://scholarworks.smith.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2397&context=theses The results are abundantly clear, the overwhelming majority of domestic abusers and sex offenders are obviously not motivated by the so called "Patriarchy" or "Toxic Masculinity", but … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/24 04:47 PM |
| 9 | Landmark scientific study concludes that sex offenders are characterised by high degrees of "criminal versatility", meaning they commit a wide variety of offences, not just solely targeting women. In fact, they were found to commit even more non sexual offences than sexual ones.Except taken from the above scientific study: "Sex offenders in specific show little empirical evidence of specialisation, but they are characterised by persistent criminal activity and tend to show criminal diversity in non-sexual crime types [53]. It was also found [54, 55, 56] that there are substantial differences between sex offenders regarding victim type. Sexual offenders against adults have more versatile criminal records [54, 55, 56], are more violent and have a higher frequency in offe… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/24 03:37 PM |
| 1 | Nearly 80% of domestic violence related incidents are highly correlated with substance abuse. So called "Patriarchy" is obviously not the actual culprit in here.I suspect that is because Lesbians have higher rates of substance abuse than Heterosexual women. Adverse childhood experiences and family rejection due to their sexual orientation might also play a role in the development of "Antisocial Personality Disorder", which is also highly correlated with domestic violence perpetration. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/24 09:47 PM |
| 2 | Nearly 80% of domestic violence related incidents are highly correlated with substance abuse. So called "Patriarchy" is obviously not the actual culprit in here.Another scientific study also concluded that residing in a household with someone engaging in alcohol and substance abuse dramatically increases one's likelihood of being a homicide victim: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9268278/ An additional scientific study also found that personality disorders have a higher prevalence amongst sex offenders when compared to non sex offenders: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S174360952201596X Finally, another scientific study indicated "… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/24 06:41 PM |
| 3 | Scientific study conducted by "Feminists" alleges that status does not necessarily make men more attractive, but that society is just more likely to attribute status to men versus women because of supposed "Sexism".What did that scientific study state again? | /r/MensRights | 04/04/24 10:35 AM |
| 29 | Scientific study conducted by "Feminists" alleges that status does not necessarily make men more attractive, but that society is just more likely to attribute status to men versus women because of supposed "Sexism".First things first, if what the authors of the scientific study above stated is actually correct, then one would assume that men's perceived status would be a fixed and invariable attribute that is not subjected to alterations as a result of particular social contexts. In other words, all men regardless of socioeconomic status would have inherent value and opportunities by the sole factor they happen to be men. If the aforementioned premise was actually correct, then one would assume that high s… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/24 08:34 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipWomen in general do not "hate" older men you freaking imbecile. Everywhere in the world, women actually desire older men: https://www.smh.com.au/national/study-finds-cougar-phenomenon-a-myth-20100818-12epa.html Women also prefer taller men as well, much more than men prefer shorter women: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236116728_Women_want_taller_men_more_than_men_want_shorter_women Stop projecting your own unsubstantiated "Feminist" bollocks on the rest of women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 09:05 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipThey are despised mostly by "Feminists" and individuals without any success in the dating department. In the real world, nobody gives a toss: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/age-gap-dating You are just attempting to project your own insecurities on others it appears. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 09:00 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipLiterally, there are at least three different "Feminist" types on this very same thread wanting to raise the age of consent to 21. There was also an entire "Feminist" movement in India that wanted to do the same thing. Such individuals absolutely do exist in real life. Just because you have never met them personally, it does not necessarily mean they do not exist. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 08:31 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipThere was an entire "Feminist" movement in India to raise the age of consent to 21. It seems fair to state this is absolutely what many "Feminists" believe in. Also, according to various polls, the vast majority of women globally do not identify as "Feminists". This is why most women do not have a problem with age gap relationships. It is only a loud minority that does. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 08:25 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipNope, quite the contrary actually. Women usually date older men, especially women in their 20's: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/age-gap-dating The only younger women that ever give a toss about such aspects are delusional "Feminists" that live in a fantasy world. Clearly, your anecdotal evidence is not supported by the data. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 08:20 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipBut it makes one a mature adult to purchase alcohol and tobacco, study, work and even join the military to die in combat? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 08:15 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipNope, that is only the "Feminist" fantasy of it to be honest. Not only women usually date older men, but women in their 20's even more so: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/age-gap-dating | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 08:13 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipNope, it certainly has to do with not having options. Most women usually date older men anyways, especially women in their 20's: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/age-gap-dating | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 08:04 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipYou are obviously entitled to your own personal opinion of course. However, you are not allowed to dictate the personal sexual decisions of consenting adults. The vast majority of women usually date older men anyway: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/age-gap-dating The only individuals that have a problem with the above are bitter and jealous "Feminists" because they are uunsuccessful the dating department. You are basically proving what the commenter above stated lol. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 08:01 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipMajority of men are actually married. The majority of women are in relationships as well. Women are not more accepting of "shitty husbands" as you called them. Quite the contrary actually, women initiate 70% of all divorces. Men are more accepting of reprehensible behaviour from women and are more likely to stick around if anything. Although the divorce rate has decreased tremendously in recent years. Also, the so called "Patriarchy" does not freaking exist. You "Femimists" literally live in the… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 07:51 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipWhy are you so swift to defend these obviously hypocritical and deeply Puritanical "Feminists"? So let me get this straight, when "Conservatives" attempt to dictate the lifestyles of others, it apparently reflects their inherent and true nature. But when "Progressives" and "Feminists" attempt to do the same, this is just a misunderstanding and a personal failing on their part that does not reflect what they actually believe in. Are you even listening to yourself mate? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 07:10 AM |
| 0 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipNope, it is actually "Progressives" who are obsessed with the supposed "harms" of age gap relationships in accordance to "Progressive" values. From sexy women in video games to sexually explicit tracks like Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines, they want to dictate and regulate what consenting adults are allowed to consume and do. Literally go on Twitter and carefully observe all the "Feminists" shaming men for what they are attracted to. "Conservatives" are far more approving of age gap relationships, … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 07:05 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipNope, it is actually the "Progressives" that freak about age gap relationships more so than "Conservatives" who tend to approve them. Similarly to freaking out about sexy women in video games and sexually explicit tracks like Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines. Literally go on Twitter and carefully observe the "Feminists" shaming men for whom they are attracted to. "Feminists" are the new Puritans, who want to regulate the personal relationships of other individuals. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 06:56 AM |
| 0 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipSo you are reffering to "Male Feminists"? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 06:50 AM |
| 1 | People here exaggerate the hate that age gap relationships get. If you're so sensitive that a few comments get you then don't be in an age gap relationshipWhat a load of "Feminazi" bollocks. If this was actually the case, the overwhelming majority of women would not be dating older men: https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/age-gap-dating You have such a low opinion of women yourself, to the point of perceiving them as literal children without any autonomy and personal agency. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 03/04/24 06:43 AM |
| 4 | A new scientific study conducted in Israel found zero gender differences in regards to the perpetration and causes of domestic violence amongst student populations.The above finding is also further supported by the fact that as much as 10% of young women might be suffering from "Conduct Disorder": https://www.nationwidechildrens.org/newsroom/news-releases/2008/11/study-finds-conduct-disorder-in-adolescent-girls-associated-with-family-characteristics-parental "Conduct Disorder" is associated with lower empathy, impulsivity, sensation seeking as well as a higher risk for perpetrating violence and lawbreaking behaviour. It may also eventually lead to the deve… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/24 09:14 AM |
| 3 | Is there any chance the "Duluth Model" will be abandoned any time soon(e.g from the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia and so on)?And which country is that, if I may ask of course? | /r/MensRights | 30/03/24 02:35 AM |
| 1 | Is there any chance the "Duluth Model" will be abandoned any time soon(e.g from the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia and so on)?The problem is that very few nations have successfully and fully implemented both the Istanbul Convention as well as the United Nations documents. As far as I am concerned, they have only been partially implemented regionally. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/24 02:28 AM |
| 14 | Braindead and ignorant "Feminists" in Russia, hold their own government as well as NATO, equally responsible for the devastating and ongoing conflict in Ukraine.Another Ukrainian "Feminist" group highlighted their fight against the so called "Patriarchy", even though Ukrainian women are exempted from military service and the overwhelming majority of the victims of war are male: https://commons.com.ua/en/right-resist-feminist-manifesto/ They also briefly referred to Russia's repressive policies against the LGBT community(fair enough), failing to include that male Homosexuals face significantly harsher penalties than female Homosexuals. And while the Russ… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/24 10:32 PM |
| 4 | Braindead and ignorant "Feminists" in Russia, hold their own government as well as NATO, equally responsible for the devastating and ongoing conflict in Ukraine.Their manifesto calls for "a bold redirection of the situation to break the militaristic spiral initiated by Russia and supported by NATO." Which indicates, they erroneously attempt to play "both sides", by assigning equal blame on NATO for the current Ukrainian conflict. In spite of referring to themselves as a supposed "Anti-War resistance movement", their actions showcase the exact opposite. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/24 10:20 PM |
| 1 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result.So much pseudohistorical bollocks, to the point it gives me the impression you are some short of a "Crypto-Fascist" in disguise. A little history lesson for yourself, while it is certainly correct that some early "Feminist" icons and pioneers were abolitionists themselves, "White Supremacists" beliefs and attitudes absolutely formed the core of the entire political movement. Slavery for example, was abolished in 1865 via the passage of the "Slavery Abolition Act", while the first iteration of th… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/24 10:00 PM |
| 1 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.I can guarantee he is probably secretly abusive as well. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/24 08:33 AM |
| 1 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.This is not a "Feminist" publication by any means. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/24 08:32 AM |
| 2 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.This is not a "Feminist" publication by any means. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/24 08:32 AM |
| 1 | "Radical Feminists" are insisting the reason on why women quite the workforce to become stay at home mothers is apparently male managers with stay at home wives, because they are supposedly more "Sexist".Even so, about 28% of all married women are stay at home mothers as well as 23% of them are employed part time. There was also a Forbes survey dating back in 2012, concluding that upwards of 84% of all women would have become stay at home mothers if they were afforded the opportunity to do so. Everyone wants what they cannot have, the grass is greener after all. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/24 08:40 PM |
| 4 | "Radical Feminists" are insisting the reason on why women quite the workforce to become stay at home mothers is apparently male managers with stay at home wives, because they are supposedly more "Sexist".Indeed, scientific research illustrates that men are more likely to be punished for taking excused absences from the workplace when compared to women for example, because they are simply expected to be more reliable workers. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/24 08:33 PM |
| 21 | "Radical Feminists" are insisting the reason on why women quite the workforce to become stay at home mothers is apparently male managers with stay at home wives, because they are supposedly more "Sexist".I will start with myself, with a beautifully written piece by a, surprisingly, "Feminist" noting the real reason why women decide to quite the workforce in favour of taking care of their children is personal choice and not discrimination: https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/26/magazine/the-opt-out-revolution.html As the article above puts it "Why don't women run the world? It is because they may not want to". Other available data from the Federal government illustrates that just 17% of married women… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/24 02:15 AM |
| 1 | Honestly, it worries me that so many individuals out there have such regressive beliefs. It is 2024 already, some women literally live in another century.You literally have women stating they "belong in the kitchen": https://youtu.be/O5Ie3nqHHA0?si=fjZTCHWxKXTn_639 Does this sound like "Left-leaning Feminism" to yourself? | /r/MensRights | 16/03/24 02:46 AM |
| 3 | Honestly, it worries me that so many individuals out there have such regressive beliefs. It is 2024 already, some women literally live in another century.Is this why most women were against female suffrage up until the 1920's, according to surveys? Or the fact the "Equal Rights Amendment" was defeated by a highly successful campaign, organised by women themselves? "Leftist on women's issues" my arse. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/24 02:27 AM |
| 4 | Honestly, it worries me that so many individuals out there have such regressive beliefs. It is 2024 already, some women literally live in another century.Indeed, we are totally in agreement! | /r/MensRights | 16/03/24 01:42 AM |
| 4 | Honestly, it worries me that so many individuals out there have such regressive beliefs. It is 2024 already, some women literally live in another century.Women take up on a larger household burden, because men simply take up on a larger financial burden. The average married man works about 39 hours per week, whereas the average married woman a mere 21. Of course women are expected to do more housework since they have more free time for themselves. Heck, about 30% of married women are stay at home mothers, which means they are not employed at all. Do they even ignore that important part of the equation for some unspecified reason? P.S. Although wo… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/24 01:41 AM |
| 4 | Honestly, it worries me that so many individuals out there have such regressive beliefs. It is 2024 already, some women literally live in another century.She also talked about the so called "Gender Wage Gap", which implies that she is probably a "Feminist". Which makes all of the above even more ironic. P.S. There is no freaking "Gender Wage Gap", it has been debunked multiple times already. Why the heck can't these blowhards understand this? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/24 07:49 PM |
| 21 | Honestly, it worries me that so many individuals out there have such regressive beliefs. It is 2024 already, some women literally live in another century.She also unabashedly stated in another one of her videos that there is "nothing wrong when it comes to cooking and cleaning for a man": https://youtu.be/TWV7i9ZPSxE?si=kiwztJrlyU3t_qEQ So basically, "Radical Feminists" screech and moan about men refusing to do their fair share of housework, while you simultaneously have women out there peddling the old notion of the female role as the homemaker. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/24 05:00 PM |
| 1 | Media/Feminist Hypocrisy on Brian Laundrie/Gabby PetitoSo called "reactive abuse" does not even exist. In fact, various scientific studies show that most domestic violence instances are reciprocal. It sounds like you are thr one that has not read any book or article on domestic violence. You are literally defending an abusive woman, that openly admitted to striking her partner first. You "Feminists" are unbelievable. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/24 08:35 AM |
| 1 | Brian Laundrie died by suicide per autopsyGabby Petito literally admitted that she committed domestic violence against Brian Laundrie, the police officers were placed in probation because they violated the law, after they decided to refrain from pressing charges against her for some peculiar reason. Most likely, the relationship was abusive from her part and he either murdered her in self-defence or he snapped. Nothing else to see in here. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/24 08:20 AM |
| 1 | Any counterarguments to a rather "Socially-Conservative" scientific study that "Feminists" have been sharing on social media, that consuming "objectifying" media supposedly leads to real life sexual violence against women?Indeed, not to mention that Barack Obama's own Department of Justice debunked the entire notion of the so called "Rape Culture" in Universities/Colleges, with a report rreleased back in 2013: https://thefederalist.com/2014/12/11/new-doj-data-on-sexual-assaults-college-students-are-actually-less-likely-to-be-victimized/ Things got so bad, that even Democrats in California refused to implement Barack Obama's "yes means yes" rules, multiple men falsely accused of sexual violence were awarded millio… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/24 02:43 AM |
| 1 | Any counterarguments to a rather "Socially-Conservative" scientific study that "Feminists" have been sharing on social media, that consuming "objectifying" media supposedly leads to real life sexual violence against women?The link between "Pornography" and real life sexual violence has been thoroughly debunked already. At best, consuming such media will have no affect on someone, at worst, there might be an addiction, engaging in risky sexual behaviours as well as being a lousy lover in general. But turning individuals into rapists and abusers? A recent scientific study absolutely busts that myth: https://www.utsa.edu/today/2020/08/story/pornography-sex-crimes-study.html Now, do not get me wrong here, I would not… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/24 08:43 PM |
| 3 | Any counterarguments to a rather "Socially-Conservative" scientific study that "Feminists" have been sharing on social media, that consuming "objectifying" media supposedly leads to real life sexual violence against women?The link between "Pornography" and real life sexual violence has been thoroughly debunked already. At best, consuming such media will have no affect on someone, at worst, there might be an addiction, engaging in risky sexual behaviours as well as being a lousy lover in general. But turning individuals into rapists and abusers? There was a scientific study conducted back in 2015 in Germany for example, where they researchers found zero scientific evidence that "Sexist" video games supposedly lead… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/24 08:37 PM |
| 1 | Any counterarguments to a rather "Socially-Conservative" scientific study that "Feminists" have been sharing on social media, that consuming "objectifying" media supposedly leads to real life sexual violence against women?I do remember the were a bunch of scientific studies that found once "Pornography" become legalised, actual sexual violence rates fell. Similarly to violent video games and movies. It is just bollocks all along. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/24 08:34 PM |
| 1 | Any counterarguments to a rather "Socially-Conservative" scientific study that "Feminists" have been sharing on social media, that consuming "objectifying" media supposedly leads to real life sexual violence against women?Indeed, researchers even conducted a massive scientific study back in 2015, testing teenagers from Germany. They actually found zero scientific evidence that "Sexist" video games supposedly lead to real life violence. It just "Christian Right" bollocks straight out of the 1990's all over again, repackaged under a veneer of "Progressivism" this time. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/24 08:31 PM |
| 2 | Any counterarguments to a rather "Socially-Conservative" scientific study that "Feminists" have been sharing on social media, that consuming "objectifying" media supposedly leads to real life sexual violence against women?I am just worried this is just another fabricated, trumped up "scientific study", in order to spread propaganda and misinformation(with a rigged, selected sample zie5 on top of it, as this unfortunately happens in scientific research). Especially in regards to the supposed "majority" of men who have domestic violence supporting attitudes, in spite of the fact past scientific research has indicated that less than 10% of all men inquired usually agree with such attitudes. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/24 08:23 PM |
| 2 | "Theocratic Feminist" Puritans are concerned with new viral TikTok trends of powerful women exploiting their own sexuality to attract men, in a "think of the children" kind of fashion.Because nobody actually "needs" the opposite sex anymore, theoritically speaking at least. However, theory and practice significantly diverge from each other oftentimes. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/24 06:54 PM |
| 2 | "Theocratic Feminist" Puritans are concerned with new viral TikTok trends of powerful women exploiting their own sexuality to attract men, in a "think of the children" kind of fashion.The common age gap in most marriages is 3 years on average, although in about 1 in 10 marriages in the Western-World, an age gap of 10 or more years can also be observed. Also, recent scientific studies have debunked the notion of women who are attracted to older men suffer from so called "daddy issues" or other similar pathologies: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/why-bad-looks-good/201908/why-many-young-women-prefer-to-date-older-men | /r/MensRights | 10/03/24 06:40 AM |
| 1 | "Theocratic Feminist" Puritans are concerned with new viral TikTok trends of powerful women exploiting their own sexuality to attract men, in a "think of the children" kind of fashion.It certainly is not, but if one takes into account the kind of individuals populating Tumblr... | /r/MensRights | 10/03/24 05:42 AM |
| 4 | "Theocratic Feminist" Puritans are concerned with new viral TikTok trends of powerful women exploiting their own sexuality to attract men, in a "think of the children" kind of fashion."Pro Ana/Mia" pages on Tumblr are entirely different than the "coquette" aesthetic currently trending on TikTok. They are not even identical, with entirely different userbases on entirely different social media platforms. Tumblr is filled to the brim with "Feminists" anyway, while TikTok is largely apathetic to it. So guess which camp is promoting all of the above... | /r/MensRights | 10/03/24 05:33 AM |
| 6 | "Theocratic Feminist" Puritans are concerned with new viral TikTok trends of powerful women exploiting their own sexuality to attract men, in a "think of the children" kind of fashion.Pretty ironic if one imagines that as soon as women turn 18, they are legally allowed to join the military, purchase alcohol and cigarettes, drive, choose to study at University/College, find employment, get married and even engage in "Sex Work". But dating an older man, is apparently "creepy" and "predatory"(even though they are allowed to have sex with such men on camera and profit from it). | /r/MensRights | 10/03/24 05:29 AM |
| 1 | "Theocratic Feminist" Puritans are concerned with new viral TikTok trends of powerful women exploiting their own sexuality to attract men, in a "think of the children" kind of fashion.Of course most women will never do such a thing, yet you have "Feminists" advocating that women somehow do not "need" men(which is obviously correct), even though their own actions show the exact opposite(they reek of desperation actually, as most men are not even attracted to "Feminists" in the first place). | /r/MensRights | 10/03/24 05:19 AM |
| 5 | "Theocratic Feminist" Puritans are concerned with new viral TikTok trends of powerful women exploiting their own sexuality to attract men, in a "think of the children" kind of fashion.I have never once encountered such aspects being encouraged. It appears to be just another "think of the children" moral panic, repackaged under a veneer of "Progressivism". And for the millionth time, many women are attracted to older men as well, do not treat them as individuals incapable of having agency of their own(we are referring to consenting adults over the legal age of majority here, so what is the actual issue of them choosing to date older men as long as they are 18?). | /r/MensRights | 10/03/24 04:55 AM |
| 9 | "Theocratic Feminist" Puritans are concerned with new viral TikTok trends of powerful women exploiting their own sexuality to attract men, in a "think of the children" kind of fashion.Much like "Feminists" bashing sexually confident women, for dating to utilise their assets to attract men: https://youtube.com/shorts/NY8Cnl_ijJY?si=8Qpnm74fSuKgzsSh "Feminists" absolutely despise female sexuality and want nothing more than to suppress it, especially if men are involved in the process. P.S. It is also incredibly ironic that "Feminists" will screech and moan that women do not actually need men(which I am obviously in agreement with of course), yet you have women all over the inte… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/24 01:15 AM |
| 2 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result.Of course I care about men(much like I care about women as well), I would not be in this subreddit in the first place if I believed otherwise. I simply highlighted examples where "Feminism" severely disadvantages and discriminates against women. There exist plenty of examples where it severely disadvantages and discriminates against men as well(where copious examples have been shared in this subreddit already). In regards to firearm ownership, of course men are significantly more likely to be vi… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/24 04:05 PM |
| 2 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result.Additional reading: https://www.npr.org/2011/03/25/134849480/the-root-how-racism-tainted-womens-suffrage | /r/MensRights | 09/03/24 03:52 PM |
| 2 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result.Read the following article in case you have any doubts: https://www.npr.org/2011/03/25/134849480/the-root-how-racism-tainted-womens-suffrage | /r/MensRights | 09/03/24 03:50 PM |
| 2 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result.Incorrect, the women in the above organisation were awoved "Progressives" and "Feminists" who also participated in the fight for female suffrage. It is notorious that suffragettes were racist and threw minority women under the bus for their own selfish reasons. In fact, minority women only secured their own voting rights decades later with the eventual passage of the "Civil Rights Act of 1964", formulated by Emanuel Celler, a non "Feminist" and major opponent of the "Equal Rights Amendment": htt… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/24 03:44 PM |
| 3 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result.Of course women face severe discrimination from "Feminists", such as Puritanical attempts to suppress female sexuality, shaming women for their lifestyle choices and opinions(especially in regards to motherhood and marriage), glorification of "Regressive" religious systems and unhealthy behaviours like obesity, the push to abolish single sex spaces and attempts to restrict firearm ownership and self-defence protections, disproportionately affecting women as a result. Men are harmed by "Feminism"… | /r/MensRights | 08/03/24 09:35 PM |
| 2 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result.Many of the founders of the women's branch of the "KKK" were avowed "Progressives" and active campaigners on female suffrage. It is in the article mate. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/24 09:28 PM |
| 4 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result.Indeed, they also have a weird obsession with imposing Puritanism on the rest of society by calling for the suppression of female sexuality. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/24 08:46 AM |
| 26 | Never forget that "Feminists" actually created the women's branch of the "KKK", a "White-Supremacist" terrorist organisation, hellbent on preserving White female power, undermining the human rights of other women as a result."Feminists" always despised women and continue to do so in this day and age. Especially in their exhortations of women holding the "wrong" opinions or voting the "wrong" way. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/24 06:26 AM |
| 1 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.Indeed, it was definitely not my intention to further gender stereotypes here, hence the quotation marks. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 03:46 PM |
| 3 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.I would state that Kpop idols are usually revered by teenagers and much less so by older women, not to mention they are also powerful, wealthy and famous, which would obviously increase their attractiveness as such traits are also associated with "Masculinity". Secondly, stereotypically "Masculine" physical features are absolutely interconnected with associated behaviours as well, as scientific studies have concluded that women do indeed reward more "Masculine" men with relationships: https://ww… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 02:06 PM |
| 1 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.There existed a University Of California scientific study published back in 2014, I cannot find it right now, although I am still looking for it. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 01:53 PM |
| 2 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.But "Feminists" still manage to blame men for the enforcement of beauty standards and traditional gender norms lol. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 10:24 AM |
| 4 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.Not true, the idea that ovulation somehow affects the type of men women are attracted to has been debunked. In reality, women display similar attraction patterns whether they are ovulating or not. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 10:06 AM |
| 10 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.Exactly, it should also be noted that according to scientific research, upwards of 30% to 60% of all personality traits are heritable, with the environment playing a somewhat equal/smaller role in their eventual development and manifestation: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-018-0263-6 Basically, they go out of their way to propagate such "Masculine" genetics they allegedly deplore, yet they simoultaneously complain about such behaviours manifesting in reality? Never forget that "Feminists… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 10:05 AM |
| 3 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.It has always been present, nothing has actually changed. Mostly teenagers attracted to such men, usually they grow out of it as they become older. P.S. Also, they also erroneously referred to Taylor Lautner as a "twink", have they even looked at pictures of his extremely muscular physique to make such an inaccurate observation? | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 09:53 AM |
| 3 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.Yet, "Feminists" blame men for women's behaviour. Eyeroll. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 09:50 AM |
| 15 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.The problem with this notion, is that it erroneously assumes women are helpless actors incapable of individual agency. "Feminists", notoriously refuse to accept women's vast contributions to the preservation of traditional gender norms and expectations, blaming the "Patriarchy" for indoctrinating everyone else(including women)instead. It is basically a pathetic "get out of jail free" card, a weak copout because they simply have no desire to hold women accountable whatsoever. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/24 01:13 AM |
| 9 | A recent scientific study actually concluded that women(especially the ones of reproductive age), prefer men with more "Masculine" facial features, debunking "Feminazi" notions about men supposedly enforcing specific beauty standards and traditional gender norms.In an ironic plot twist, it is actually the other way around. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/24 10:58 PM |
| 6 | Majority of Europeans in a survey conducted in over 7 European nations, do not actually believe that women are supposedly portrayed and presented "unfairly" and "inaccurately" in the media."Anime exaggerates their bodies to be unrealistic and inaccurate." Anime is supposed go be fictional, basically, no different than male characters being presented in a "hyper muscular" fashion(with DragonBall Z and Tokyo Ghoul serving as a potent examples). "In advertisements, particularly those promoting beauty, for instance soap bar companies, script their ads in such a way that it-> depict mothers using those soap bars to magically appear younger, while neglecting to mention any benefits on a… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/24 02:42 AM |
| 4 | Majority of Europeans in a survey conducted in over 7 European nations, do not actually believe that women are supposedly portrayed and presented "unfairly" and "inaccurately" in the media.It is in the survey, perhaps, you were confused by the title it appears. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/24 01:45 AM |
| 9 | Majority of Europeans in a survey conducted in over 7 European nations, do not actually believe that women are supposedly portrayed and presented "unfairly" and "inaccurately" in the media.Quite the contrary actually, most European actually believe that women are depicted in a "fair" and "accurate" manner in the media, not the reverse. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/24 12:26 AM |
| 6 | Majority of Europeans in a survey conducted in over 7 European nations, do not actually believe that women are supposedly portrayed and presented "unfairly" and "inaccurately" in the media.No different than how men are depicted in both of the avenues you highlighted. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/24 12:25 AM |
| 16 | "Radical Feminazis" erroneously assert the debunked "1 in 4" University/College women have been victims of rape, as well as 25% of male responders allegedly approving of rape attitudes.They basically claimed that according to some surveys, supposedly 25% of all male responders did approve of rape. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/24 04:42 PM |
| 10 | "Radical Feminazis" erroneously assert the debunked "1 in 4" University/College women have been victims of rape, as well as 25% of male responders allegedly approving of rape attitudes.Of course it is a biased media outlet, but at least it cites official statistics by the Federal Government. Honestly, would you like me to share a CNN or an MSNBC report instead? | /r/MensRights | 03/03/24 04:41 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Certainly, orgasms should not even be considered the goal of sexual activity. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 04:35 PM |
| 2 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Why do you place the responsibility solely on your partner, even though you know your body better then him? You see, that is what I personally take issue with, expecting your partner to instinctively know everything about you and when they cannot keep up(because they do not happen to be mind-readers obviously), you complain about their lackluster performance. P.S. My previous comment got deleted for some strange reason. Apologies for that one. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 04:32 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Alright then, we are in agreement here. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 04:28 PM |
| – | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Why is it my responsibility to inquire my own partner what they actually enjoy sexually? Don't they know themselves better and even in many cases, I have had my questions dodged for whatever reason. I absolutely want to engage in a productive conversation, the problem is that you are simply interested with putting the blame solely on men, blaming their overall performance and downplaying the number of selfish women out there. P.S. I am actually of the opinion that both men and women need to impr… | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 04:25 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Women do indeed experience significantly more orgasms by themselves when compared to engaging in sexual activity with their partners(about 92%), but so do men as well. In fact, according to the data I shared above, about 1 in 10 men do not experience orgasm when engaging in sexual activity with their partners. Bisexual women might also be less likely to experience orgasm when it comes to having sex with other women(64%-66%), when compared to their Heterosexual counterparts(65%-68%). However, you… | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 04:16 PM |
| 3 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).I have never claimed there exists no "gap", what I actually asserted is the "gap" is incredibly small, as the vast majority of Heterosexual women still reach climax frequently(not just 60%, but more closer to 70%). Furthermore, a recent poll conducted by Ipsos, with upwards of 22.000 individuals in over 32 countries globally, found basically there exists no "gender gap" in regards to the rates of reported sexual satisfaction: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/valentines-day-how-satisfied-are-people-th… | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 04:08 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Biological difficulties and conditions affect both men and women unfortunately. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 03:36 PM |
| 2 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Most of the contemporary "slut shaming" comes primarily from "Feminists" themselves, lambasting sexually explicit depictions of women in popular culture, scantily clad dressing codes and even men being interested in women's sexual pleasure. Seriously, take a peek at the following article from "Cosmopolitan": https://www.dailywire.com/news/cosmo-females-should-never-experience-sexual-amanda-prestigiacomo We do not live in the 1990's anymore, "Feminists" are basically the new "Christian Right". | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 03:29 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).It is fine mate, take care! | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 03:26 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Individuals who are content with their sex lives usually do not complain about them. Complaining usually comes from the negative Nancies of the world, regardless of gender of course. P.S. And in case you have any doubts, hop on the R/DeadBedrooms subreddit to see all the men doing everything in their power to please their partners, with the latter still continuing being apprehensive about sex in general. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 03:15 PM |
| 2 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).I have encountered my fair share of "pillow princesses" and women being unwilling to communicate their sexual wants and needs, expect others to basically lead the entire sexual interaction, be mind-readers and instinctively get to figure out what they actually wearn for. I have encountered many women that unfortunately do not put any effort at all, yet I refuse to utilise such anecdotes to back up my case. The data I posted speak for themselves. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 03:09 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).I am sorry about your issues mate. Wishing the best for you, take care! | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 03:02 PM |
| 2 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Then how come, in the overwhelming majority of countries across the world, not only are the overwhelming majority of individuals satisfied with their own relationships, a "gender difference" and a "gap" in relationship and sexual satisfaction is basically non-existent: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/valentines-day-how-satisfied-are-people-their-love-life | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 02:51 PM |
| 5 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).Furthermore, according to a recent poll conducted by Ipsos, with upwards of 22.000 individuals in more then 32 countries globally, not only are the overwhelming majority of individuals satisfied with their own relationships, a "gender difference" is also basically non-existent: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/valentines-day-how-satisfied-are-people-their-love-life | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 02:02 AM |
| 20 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).It is easy to put the blame on others instead of accepting responsibility for your actions. That goes for both men and women unfortunately. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 01:06 AM |
| 1 | Debunking the "Feminist" narrative in regards to the so called "Orgasm Gap":While Heterosexual men are indeed significantly more likely to experience orgasm(92%-95%), the overwhelming majority of Heterosexual women do so as well(65%-68%).I appreciate your input. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/24 01:05 AM |
| 1 | "Feminists" allege the so called "Lesbian Death Bed" is apparently a myth and that Lesbian women have more satisfying sexual experiences when compared to their Heterosexual counterparts.Another recent scientific study found that partnered women experience significantly higher levels of sexual satisfaction when compared to their single counterparts: https://medium.com/sexography/https-medium-com-sexography-women-in-committed-relationships-experience-more-orgasms-b96dbae0fa2a | /r/MensRights | 27/02/24 09:17 PM |
| 4 | "Feminists" allege the so called "Lesbian Death Bed" is apparently a myth and that Lesbian women have more satisfying sexual experiences when compared to their Heterosexual counterparts.Not to mention that upwards of 62% of Heterosexual women have reported achieving an orgasm the last time they engaged on sexual activity. A statistic that actually increases with age mind you: https://www.ahyes.org/blogs/blog-posts/10-interesting-facts-about-the-female-orgasm | /r/MensRights | 27/02/24 03:10 PM |
| 5 | "Feminists" allege the so called "Lesbian Death Bed" is apparently a myth and that Lesbian women have more satisfying sexual experiences when compared to their Heterosexual counterparts.Just an unreliable online poll basically, not a random sample size or anything. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/24 03:06 PM |
| 1 | What would you do if you discovered you were dating a Feminist?Unfortunately, not true. Men still carry the financial burden in most relationships, according to various scientific studies. Most couples certainly do not split, some polls have also indicated that women generally find men not paying for the first date to be a dealbreaker. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/24 02:31 AM |
| 1 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Just 51% of all Australians identify themselves as "Feminists", certainly not the majority: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-01/some-muslims-fear-feminism-others-believe-compatible-with-islam/100254942 It is 50/50 in Australia still. | /r/MensRights | 26/02/24 09:17 PM |
| 1 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.This is an incredibly biased poll you shared, primarily conducted by "Liberal" sources, therefore rendering it highly inaccurate. Do you have something more objective and accurate at hand? P.S. Was this poll conducted by the "White Ribbon Campaign" Facebook group? | /r/MensRights | 26/02/24 09:09 PM |
| 1 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.This was a poorly formulated poll, as it basically inquired on whether most Americans agree fully or somewhat with the label "Feminist", where most polls ask on whether they simply identify as "Feminists" or not. Someone might agree with certain aspects of a particular movement, but still not be in favour of embracing everything said movement advocates. Still, just 19% of all women felt the label "Feminist" completely applies to themselves. It should also be noted that most PewResearchCenter sur… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/24 09:07 PM |
| 1 | What to make of the "Feminist" claim that women's teams are missing 1.1 billion dollars in Federal scholarship aid when compared to their male peers, allegedly a violation of Title IX rules?Exactly, because women represent the overwhelming majority of University/College students, obviously they will receive more federal aid. Since men are significantly more likely to be involved in sports, they will also receive more federal athletic aid on top of it. It simply has to do with representation numbers and obviously not with "Sexism". | /r/MensRights | 25/02/24 05:42 PM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.What is the actual response rate in regards to the sexual harassment population? Personally, I cannot see to find it at all. Where did you find this yourself? | /r/MensRights | 24/02/24 03:45 PM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.They have explained their methodology further in additional posts: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/methodology-38/ "The cumulative response rate, accounting for non response to the recruitment surveys and attrition is 5.3%". Which translates in less than 1 out of 10 individuals contacted to participate in their survey eventually responding at all. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/24 03:25 PM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.They have explained their methodology further in additional posts: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/methodology-38/ "The cumulative response rate, accounting for non response to the recruitment surveys and attrition is 5.3%". Which translates in less than 1 out of 10 individuals contacted to participate in their survey eventually responding at all. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/24 02:29 PM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.They have explained their methodology further in additional posts: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/methodology-38/ "The cumulative response rate, accounting for non response to the recruitment surveys and attrition is 5.3%". Which translates in less than 1 out of 10 individuals contacted to participate in their survey eventually responding at all. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/24 02:26 PM |
| 2 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.Then I guess you are also in favour of "private companies" refusing to hire LGBT folks and minorities as well correct? Since a "private company" can do however it pleases, what is the actual harm here? | /r/MensRights | 23/02/24 06:05 PM |
| 1 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.Women actually like to frequent such establishments as well. An old Mythbusters experiment actually found that women are more likely to offer tips to attractive waitresses when compared to men for example: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6YJ91FKZHI0 Furthermore, Hooters Girls are not even that "revealing", they are just slightly sexy and more talkative than your average waitress to be honest. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/24 05:20 PM |
| 1 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.I only encountered this article in a blog, I do not read any worthless tabloids myself. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/24 03:54 PM |
| 2 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.Of course it is not, although you will definitely not be hard pressed to find Pro-Hamas voices and content in "Feminist" spaces to be honest. Many "Feminists" actually perceive both Hezbollah and Hamas as "freedom fighters" and "liberators". | /r/MensRights | 23/02/24 03:47 PM |
| 8 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.It depends on the woman in question to be honest. In my personal experience, women who identify as "Feminists" are significantly more likely to be attracted to toxic men, perhaps because they lacked healthy male role models growing up. On the other hand, women who have no inherent desire to virtue-signal, are significantly more likely to be attracted to healthy "Masculine" iterations, in addition to having rewarding relationships with men on top of it. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/24 03:44 PM |
| 10 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.Evey single time... | /r/MensRights | 23/02/24 10:29 AM |
| 39 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.Precisely, similarly to the women who attempt to behave as if they happen to be "one of the boys". Most men I am aware of would view such women with extreme suspicion. Real individuals do not need to attach labels to themselves, whether they believe in "Egalitarian" principles is radiated through their actions. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/24 02:20 AM |
| 9 | Actually, women do not trust "Male Feminists" in the slightest, primarily because(more often than not)they happen to be incredibly creepy and sketchy.Something that has been further exemplified by the recent Joss Whedon fiasco: https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/why-you-shouldnt-trust-a-male-feminist | /r/MensRights | 23/02/24 02:17 AM |
| 7 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.You are making it about men, while you simultaneously IGNORE the fact that women CHOOSE to fill such positions on their own volition. Many women actually protested the move: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vdbD7EF4Byw You are utilising the exact same "Sexist" arguments that "Radical Feminazis" did put forward in regards to said issue. Which is why such issues should be addressed, because they violate the individual liberties of both men and women alike. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 09:20 PM |
| 7 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.The campaign to shut down F1 "Grid Girls" in the United Kingdom begs to differ. Women being forced to lose employment beg to differ as well. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 07:11 PM |
| 5 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.I have visited Hooters multiple times, many of them with female friends of mine(one of them Bisexual as well). Nobody gives a toss actually, neither did my female friends as well. Some individuals visit such places for the food and definitely not to ogle on the waitresses. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 07:09 PM |
| 9 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.During the height of the "MeToo" Era, which makes the results even more ironic. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 06:42 PM |
| 5 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.Because "Radical Feminazi" desire nothing more than restaurant chains such as the above to be shut down by demonizing men on top of it all? Just some food for thought. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 06:41 PM |
| 5 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.Because "Radical Feminazi" desire nothing more than restaurant chains such as the above to be shut down by demonizing men on top of it all? Just some food for thought. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 06:41 PM |
| 9 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.In addition to sexy, fake, pixelated characters in video games... | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 06:40 PM |
| 4 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.I am pretty convinced she was just another "Radical Feminazi" or a "Progressive" imbecile. Therefore, her opinion should be disregarded outright. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 06:32 PM |
| 6 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.Such individuals sound exactly like the "Religous Right" back in the 1990's, when they were freaking out about nudity in Television. In the modern era, it is actually the "Feminazis" that have taken up their place. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 06:29 PM |
| 14 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.They do not actually, as the "Feminist" political movement only appears to be concerned with White, upper middle class women. They do not give a toss about working class women to be honest. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 04:29 PM |
| 16 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.Sure, but everyone subsequently abandons their own misconceptions and eventually gets on board. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 03:46 PM |
| 91 | Women working at "Hooters" actually feel safer, nor do they experience elevated rates of sexual harassment. In spite of "Radical Feminazis" stating otherwise.Despite the unhinged protests by "Radical Feminazis" during the "MeToo" Era, the restaurant chain continues to experience unprecedented domestic as well as international growth: https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/global-growth-continues-to-surge-for-hooters-announces-recent-mexico-development-753dcfe8 As it turns out, nobody actually gives a toss about the "politically correct" rubbish in real life, other than "Radical Feminazis" themselves of course. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/24 03:30 PM |
| 2 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Neither does Angela Merkel, as well as the majority of German women. Yet this has not stopped "Radical Feminazis" as the NewYorkTimes complaining about it: https://thefederalist.com/2017/09/19/feminism-not-angela-merkel-reason-german-women-dont-like-feminism/ | /r/MensRights | 20/02/24 05:49 PM |
| 2 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.True, although the "Feminist" in the video above stated that women are somehow not "accepted" all. This is why I provided evidence to the contrary. P.S. It should also be noted that Lilla Lombardi took part in over 12 different "Grand Prix" competitions. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/24 08:37 PM |
| 1 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.How is this a "women's rights" issue? I mean, forcing women to lose their employment is hardly a "women's rights" victory. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/24 07:18 PM |
| 0 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.To be fair, Pierce Morgan did in the start of the video. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/24 07:17 PM |
| 1 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.I listed both of the aforementioned women as examples of rather "unattractive" individuals, still becoming successful within the F1 realm. In spite of the "Feminist" in the video above arguing that F1 leaders supposedly told her they refuse to accept female drivers that are not "pretty enough". | /r/MensRights | 19/02/24 07:15 PM |
| 1 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.Go and look up Lilla Lombardi as well as Jamie Chadwick in case you have any doubts. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/24 05:44 AM |
| 2 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.There are also the cases of Lilla Lombardi as well as Jamie Chadwick, none of whom are stereotypically "attractive" women, yet they still succeeded within the F1 realm. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/24 05:40 AM |
| 12 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.The downfall of Lizzo happened after a score or sexual harassment allegations against her. The so called "body positivity" movement is dead once and for all and this is absolutely an excellent thing. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/24 02:04 AM |
| 7 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.She also erroneously implied that she felt "uncomfortable" working at F1(which ie only her own subjective experience), even though multiple women have expressed an alternative viewpoint: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vdbD7EF4Byw In rages to the so called "Gender Wage Gap", there exists no "widespread" conversation about it, not only did the United States Department Of Labour released a report debunking the entire concept back in 2019, even the Economist published an article back in 2017, arguing… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 09:53 PM |
| 11 | "Feminist" troglodyte getting smacked by Pierce Morgan, in regards to her support of the controversial F1 "Grid Girl" ban. Even though 68% of the British public disagreed.Firstly, she made a(probably)fabricated comment in regards to F1 leaders, supposedly telling her thry do not accepted female drivers because they are, apparently, not attractive enough. Is there any actual evidence to support such a statement? | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 09:41 PM |
| 1 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" propaganda in regards to the increasing numbers of single and lonely young men, puts the blame mostly on such individuals, while simultaneously avoiding to hold women accountable.Women are as sexless as men are in Japan to be honest. The Japanese work too much and have no time for relationships, so they avoid them altogether. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 08:29 AM |
| 1 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" propaganda in regards to the increasing numbers of single and lonely young men, puts the blame mostly on such individuals, while simultaneously avoiding to hold women accountable.But there isn't, quite the contrary actually. Many women absolutely want our society to retain those "Traditional" structures instead of progressing. Men do so as well. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 08:12 AM |
| 3 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" propaganda in regards to the increasing numbers of single and lonely young men, puts the blame mostly on such individuals, while simultaneously avoiding to hold women accountable.A mere 20% of Gen Z women identify as "Bisexual" and even so, the vast majority of "Bisexual" men and eventually end up in "Heterosexual" relationships: https://slate.com/human-interest/2016/05/over-80-percent-of-bisexuals-end-up-in-straight-relationships-why.html Which absolutely makes sense, since most actually desire biological children and have no willingness to adopt or even utilise a sperm donor. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 07:51 AM |
| 1 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" propaganda in regards to the increasing numbers of single and lonely young men, puts the blame mostly on such individuals, while simultaneously avoiding to hold women accountable.I am aware, but they at least link the scientific studies in question and I could not find anything better. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 07:46 AM |
| 6 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" propaganda in regards to the increasing numbers of single and lonely young men, puts the blame mostly on such individuals, while simultaneously avoiding to hold women accountable.And for the last time, women are absolutely NOT the ones demanding more "emotionally expressive men", in direct contrast to the more "Masculine" ideal. Quite the contrary actually, mothers are the ones shaming their sons for healthy emotional expression, instead of fathers: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-mothers-have-boys-dont-cry-bias-new-study-suggests/ https://time.com/3581587/mothers-emotion-words-girls-boys-surrey-studymothers-encourage-emotions-more-in-daughters-over-sons-s… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 07:34 AM |
| 3 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" propaganda in regards to the increasing numbers of single and lonely young men, puts the blame mostly on such individuals, while simultaneously avoiding to hold women accountable.Women absolutely enforce specific gender expectations and norms, as they reward more "Masculine" men with marriage and relationships: https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/study-shows-very-masculine-men-are-more-likely-to-be-happy-and-married In addition to praising and idolising more "Masculine" men on social media, such as Travis Kelce and Chase Stokes: https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/are-hunky-men-back-in-demand In fact, in more "Liberal" and "Egalitarian" countries, women are actually more lik… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 07:26 AM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Of course it does not, I am simply stating that individuals of different political orientations rarely end up in relationships with each other. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 07:22 AM |
| 11 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" propaganda in regards to the increasing numbers of single and lonely young men, puts the blame mostly on such individuals, while simultaneously avoiding to hold women accountable.What a load of "Feminazi Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy theories, where should I begin in debunking all of the nonsense that you spewed? First things first, while it is certainly correct to state that married women, on average, take the lead in regards to housework and childcare responsibilities, that is primarily because their husbands take the lead in regards to financial provision: https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbands Even amongst highly… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/24 07:16 AM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.It is unscientitic because an online panel was utilised, not a random representative sample. The problem with such methods is that individuals that are already interested in such topics, are significantly more willing to sign up for such panels, skewing the results in their favour on top of it. Not to mention the response rate was less than 30%, making the results even mode dubious. Furthermore, the poll above defined "touching that made you uncomfortable"(which could literally be anything from … | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 11:49 AM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.Of course not, you have perhaps misconstrued by intentions entirely. It is unscientitic because an online panel was utilised, not a random representative sample. The problem with such methods is that individuals that are already interested in such topics, are significantly more willing to sign up for such panels, skewing the results in their favour on top of it. Not to mention the response rate was less than 30%, making the results even mode dubious. Furthermore, the poll above defined "touching… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 11:49 AM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.Exactly, 3 out of those 6 behaviours cannot even be classified as sexual harassment to be honest. The poll noted the most common instances that women experienced were "being touched in a way that made you feel uncomfortable" as well as "spreading rumours about your sexual history". None of the aforementioned behaviours constitute sexual harassment, being touched in ways that make one feel uncomfortable can encompass anything from genital touching to elbow touching. "Publicly sharing contact info… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 11:32 AM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.It is unscientitic because an online panel was utilised, not a random representative sample. The problem with such methods is that individuals that are already interested in such topics, are significantly more willing to sign up for such panels, skewing the results in their favour on top of it. Not to mention the response rate was less than 30%, making the results even mode dubious. Furthermore, the poll above defined "touching that made you uncomfortable"(which could literally be anything from … | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 11:24 AM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the "Feminazi Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy in regards to the alleged "gender gap" in happiness?The problem is that even though men work more demanding career, with longer hours and take even more overtime than women, they still report significantly higher levels of happiness. So, I do not know what there is to be honest. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 03:02 AM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the "Feminazi Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy in regards to the alleged "gender gap" in happiness?I would not necessarily state that women are working more than men, since men are working more demanding jobs on average, with longer hours and usually take more overtime. Furthermore, about 28% of married women are stay at home mothers in America, with the rest working part time jobs, relying on their husbands for financial provision. And then we wonder why men have three times the suicide rate of women. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.I remember reading a scientific study once, showing that sexual harassment is far less common than many actually believe. The responders of the poll I shared were basically recruited from an online panel, with a somewhat low response rate. Making the results even more dubious, although I welcome any other inputs you might personally have. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 02:34 AM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls."While single-and-looking men and women report equal levels of dissatisfaction with their dating lives and the ease of finding people to date, women are more likely to say they have had some particularly negative experiences. Most women who are currently single and looking to date (65%) say they have experienced at least one of six harassing behaviors asked about in the survey from someone they were dating or had been on a date with, such as being touched in a way that made them uncomfortable or… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 02:27 AM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.I would like to highlight that in regards to the second scientific study you linked, since it was conducted by "Feminists", it put forward the erroneous assumption that men allegedly have more social power than women therefore their sexual victimisation might be less severe, in addition to that gender tropes popular in the media supposedly instigate men to commit sexual violence. However, various scientific studies have concluded that "Psychopaths" are significantly more likely believe in the va… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 02:20 AM |
| 1 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.Here you go mate: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/ | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 12:06 AM |
| 2 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.Here you go mate: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/ | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 12:06 AM |
| 2 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.I just noticed this now, my mistake. Here you go mate: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/ | /r/MensRights | 16/02/24 12:05 AM |
| 1 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Well, you have to take into account that just 19% of women stated the label "Feminist" describes completely, while the majority stated they identity with the label somewhat or not at all. That, in addition to the fact that PewResearchCenter is a notoriously "Liberal" organisation, which would obviously skew the results a fair bit. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 11:43 PM |
| 1 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Since I created the title, it is my mistake, I apologise for that. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 11:20 PM |
| 1 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Iceland currently has a population of 376.000, that means that less than 30% of the total population went on strike. And that is in, perhaps, the most "Feminist" nation in the world, even more so than other Scandinavian countries. In direct comparison, a significantly lower portion of women attended the "Women's March", over 4.4 million of them in the United States alone, with the rest 600.000 being scattered in nations across the globe. The United States has a population of over 160.000.000 wom… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 10:46 PM |
| 3 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.If dating has supposedly become harder for women, then how come the majority of young women are currently in relationships, whereas the majority of young men remain single? https://www.foxnews.com/media/more-than-60-percent-young-men-single-study-finds-young-women-dating Furthermore, it is actually a myth that most Americans are turning towards online dating because of the social changes allegedly ushered by the "MeToo" movement, since another poll by the same organisation showed that just 10% o… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 10:41 PM |
| 5 | Unscientific poll alleges that 65% of women and 50% of men, have supposedly faced sexual harassment. Just more proof on why one cannot trust polls.Could anyone, perhaps, share another credible scientific study showcasing the actual sexual harassment rates, without any pitlical bias of course? Thanks in advance. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 10:22 PM |
| 1 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Firstly, I am not the one that issued the downvotes, apologies for letting you believe that. Although I would like to ask on what are both the "Nola" and the "Bourbon" you are constantly referring to. Secondly, how come organisations such as the "NOW" and "CATW" have protested against the "Sex Industry" in the United States(as well as other countries)for decades? And do not even get me started on the backlash against sexually explicit imagery in video games and popular culture in general. Or pos… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 08:09 AM |
| 2 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Call yourself an "Egalitarian" mate. And it is funny that you are referring to Strip Clubs, when it has actually been "Feminists" such as the "National Organisation For Women" advocating against them and do not even get me started on the Strip Club ban in Iceland back in 2009. P.S. If you do not want others(regardless of gender that is), to be involved in women's reproductive decisions, you should not make it their financial responsibility. As long as they are being compelled to subsidize the pe… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 06:19 AM |
| 3 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Of course this is an excellent thing. Nobody should identify with the toxic "Feminist" political movement, but it is incredibly ironic when the group it is supposed to represent, fundamentally rejects said political movement. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 06:12 AM |
| 1 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.That is exactly what it means lol. Even though most American women believe in equal rights, they refuse to identify "Feminists" because they simply disagree with the policies of said political movement. Do keep in mind that most American women are either "Conservatives" or "Independents", with men swinging far more towards the "Republican" direction than women towards the "Democrat" one: https://news.gallup.com/poll/609776/democrats-lose-ground-black-hispanic-adults.aspx | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 06:07 AM |
| 2 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Exactly, just like most men would not show up to a pro-ISIS or pro-Taliban protest. A very small portion of individuals are actually "Sexist", most favour equal rights instead. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 06:01 AM |
| 3 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.They did not assume what you insinuated lol. The aforementioned women's publication, was actually content with the fact that most women are shying away from that label. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 05:59 AM |
| 9 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Exactly, an additional YouGov survey noted that 8 out of 10 individuals in five different Western countries stated they believed in equal rights, however they did not identify themselves as "Feminists" per se. Said survey utilised accurate, precise and separate questions, showcasing the failing nature of the many "Feminist" inspired surveys you described. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 05:55 AM |
| 0 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Iceland has a population of over 300.000, so you are basically telling me that hundreds of thousands of women went on strike? How many attended that protest to be exact? | /r/MensRights | 15/02/24 05:50 AM |
| 0 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Not bu a long shot. It is because most women are not "Sexist" by default and certainly not "Misandrist". Let the "Feminazis" be ostracised by the rest of society and die alone. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/24 09:32 PM |
| 2 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.Interesting, I was not aware of that. Could you, perhaps, provide a source in regards to the levels of "Feminist" identification in other Western nations when compared to the United States? And indeed, Reddit is nothing more than an internet bubble that does not correspond with reality. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/24 09:30 PM |
| 19 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.A few "Feminazi" women striked againt the so called "Gender Wage Gap" in Iceland, they do not happen to represent all women however. Do not forget the so called "Gender Wage Gap" was debunked by a woman herself, who even won the recent "Nobel Prize" in economics. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/24 09:29 PM |
| 10 | According to a recent YouGov survey conducted back in 2018, just 38% of American women identify as "Feminists", including in 5 other Western nations, in spite the majority being obviously in favour of equal rights.As far as I am concerned, this is also the case in the United Kingdom as well, with only 7% of Britons ever identifying as "Feminists": https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/only-7-per-cent-of-britons-consider-themselves-feminists/ Although maybe some Britons can update me on recent trends in their own country(even though I am a half British myself, I actually grew up in Australia, so I am kind of lost in regards to the political landscape of said country). | /r/MensRights | 14/02/24 08:28 PM |
| 1 | Why the heck men get bullied for dating adult teenagers ?First things first, consensual sexual relationships are not your freaking business. And secondly, a whooping 56% of women prefer to date older men, with about 45% of women wanting such men to be between 6 to 15 years older on average, according to polling: https://www.realmenrealstyle.com/older-men-younger-women/ https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/why-bad-looks-good/201908/why-many-young-women-prefer-to-date-older-men Individuals will continue dating other individuals regardless of age pr… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 12:58 PM |
| 3 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.What is actually ironic is that said "Feminist" who wrote the article you linked above, erroneously stated that her political movement supposedly stands for "women's rights", yet then she went on and cited the following article: https://www.salon.com/2018/11/29/stop-selling-women-empowerment-feminism-it-doesnt-work-and-its-holding-women-back/ That article is just another example of a "Feminist" assault on individual liberty, which insinuates that specific personal decisions women make for themse… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 12:10 PM |
| 3 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.A "Feminist" above yoursel issued the following response to my post: "She was a great figure of women’s rights, but also a racist. Both those things aren’t i compatible, but that doesn’t mean feminists are racists. Pretty sure a lot of non-feminist and anti-feminist were also white supremacist at this time" They referred to her as a "great figure for women's rights", even though she only focused on securing and advancing the human rights of White women. It appears that your ilk has not learned f… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 07:19 AM |
| 1 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.But they absolutely do ineeed hold up such historical figures like the above in high esteem and recognition today. Never forget that because the "Feminist" political movement was "White Supremacist" to the core, minority women only secured their own human rights decades later. The ripple effects of the "Fascist" and "Theocratic Feminist" political movement were felt for decades to come and even to this day and age(the alcohol prohibition that was spearheaded by "Feminists" during the "Progressiv… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 07:14 AM |
| 1 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.Of course it is, they even fling and flex their "Feminist" credentials in CCP speeches as well as the United Nations repeatedly. It appears you have not been paying as much attention as you should. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 07:14 AM |
| 2 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.Not necessarily a "White Supremacist" female political movement still, but definitely an "Upper Middle Class" female political movement. Heck, even the "MeToo" movement was accused to ignoring the higher rates of sexual victimisation amongst working class women through it's sheer obsession with the false University/College "Rape Epidemic" moral panic, in spite of the fact that statistics released by the "Department Of Justice" showed that such women are significantly less likely to be sexually v… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 07:10 AM |
| 2 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.Interesting, "Feminists" are literal "Fascists". | /r/MensRights | 11/02/24 07:03 AM |
| 6 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.I mean, if you only view women as inherently good, as well as incapable of independent thought and making their own personal decisions, baseless and untrue statements such as the above are the sole logical conclusion. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 05:13 PM |
| 12 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.Seriously? Any source for said claim? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 05:11 PM |
| 9 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.But they absolutely do ineeed hold up such historical figures like the above in high esteem and recognition today. Never forget that because the "Feminist" political movement was "White Supremacist" to the core, minority women only secured their own human rights decades later. The ripple effects of the "Fascist" and "Theocratic Feminist" political movement were felt for decades to come and even to this day and age(the alcohol prohibition that was spearheaded by "Feminists" during the "Progressiv… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 04:58 PM |
| 6 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.Interesting, I was not aware of this. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 04:51 PM |
| 14 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.We do not refer to them as "Feminazis" for no reason at all! | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 03:25 PM |
| 57 | Rebecca Felton, a leading figure of the "Feminist" political movement, in addition to a staunch "White Supremacist" as well as the last slave owner to serve in the United States Congress. Never forget that "Feminists" did nothing to advance women's rights.The "Feminist" political movement was actually filled to the brim with "White Supremacists" and Puritans that supported alcohol prohibition: https://iai.tv/video/the-dark-side-of-feminism-tommy-curry?utm_source=reddit&_auid=2020 In fact, they excluded all Black women from their political movement, so the latter group basically had to fight alone in regards to the advancement of it's own human rights: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/07/us-suffragette-movement-black-women-19th-amendme… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 03:02 PM |
| 2 | And then "Feminazis" erroneously assume that men are supposedly the ones enforcing gender norms...Well, to be fair the British government at least acknowledges domestic and sexual violence against men, in addition to the various NGO's catering to men listed in it's website. In the United States on the other hand, though the CDC includes domestic and sexual violence against men in it's own statistics, the "Fascist" Duluth Model unfortunately reigns supreme. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/24 02:42 PM |
| 1 | Let's discuss the "Feminist" concept of the so called "objectification theory".I see, I definitely appreciate your detailed response. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 03:57 PM |
| 1 | Let's discuss the "Feminist" concept of the so called "objectification theory".Exactly as you stated yourself. Women mostly utilise non lethal suicide methods, when men attempt suicide, they do it for real. Although support should be offered to individuals regardless of sex, in addition to ending the stigma in regards to mental health. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 03:55 PM |
| 1 | Let's discuss the "Feminist" concept of the so called "objectification theory".What you are describing was basically called the "grievance studies affair". And then "Feminazis" wonder why only 25% of Americans ever identify with their failing political movement. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 03:52 PM |
| 2 | Let's discuss the "Feminist" concept of the so called "objectification theory".It is as if these Puritans are utilising recycled and repackaged "arguments" the "Religious Right" forwarded years ago, under a veneer of "Progressivism" of course. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 12:55 PM |
| 1 | Let's discuss the "Feminist" concept of the so called "objectification theory".The only women I have ever encountered that have a personal problem with so called "sexual objectification" are either "Radical Feminazis" or "Religious Fundamentalists". I mean, just take a peek all over social media in case you have any doubts, there exist women on TikTok bragging about all the attention they receive from men in their DM's. Including viral videos such as the following: https://youtube.com/shorts/ijNR-hEnnak?si=DhsgBOBN6cJL18kF The above is what "Radical Feminazis" would classi… | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 12:15 PM |
| 2 | Let's discuss the "Feminist" concept of the so called "objectification theory".It should also be noted the entire concept of "objectification" was formulated by Enlightenment Philosopher Immanuel Kant. The exact same individual who argued that any sexual relations outside of marriage constitute "sexual objectification". Let that sink in. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 12:03 PM |
| 1 | Let's discuss the "Feminist" concept of the so called "objectification theory".Exactly, I would also attest this to be the same case for men as well. Individuals have an inherent need to be sexually desided, regardless of gender that is. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 11:59 AM |
| 1 | Let's discuss the "Feminist" concept of the so called "objectification theory".Exactly, I would also attest this to be the same case for men as well. Individuals have an inherent need to be sexually desided, regardless of gender that is. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 11:56 AM |
| 8 | And then "Feminazis" erroneously assume that men are supposedly the ones enforcing gender norms...They clearly live in an alternate reality. Unreal.. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/24 09:50 AM |
| 3 | "Feminazi Fundamentalist" complains about the popularity of high heels for women, in spite of the fact the scientific studies she cited in this article, have shown that both men and women find such footwear attractive.I mean, of course she is insinuating the alleged catcalling to be a "moral failing of men"(since she assumes that such behaviours are mostly expressed by men themselves). She basically stated that because high heels are supposedly "sexualised"(in spite of plenty of scientific evidence to the contrary), women wearing such footwear might be indirectly "harmed" as a result. Hence, her apparent confusion thrown around in regards to the fact that high heels are more attractive, by commenting on the f… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/24 06:19 AM |
| 6 | "Feminazi Fundamentalist" complains about the popularity of high heels for women, in spite of the fact the scientific studies she cited in this article, have shown that both men and women find such footwear attractive.Sure, although she also included comments amounting to the following: "Women in heels are more attractive. Sorry, I don't make the rules." As well as: "This doesn’t quite track for me. Based on years of personal experience, I can promise you that women definitely get catcalled way more often if they are wearing heels rather than flats, even if they’re wearing the exact same outfit otherwise, and I would actually like to see a follow-up study testing this hypothesis." The author appears to be inc… | /r/MensRights | 08/02/24 04:54 AM |
| 3 | "Feminazi Fundamentalist" complains about the popularity of high heels for women, in spite of the fact the scientific studies she cited in this article, have shown that both men and women find such footwear attractive.Exactly, they are attempting(unsuccessfully of course)to continue being relevant by focusing on unsubstantiated and delusional conspiracy theories. | /r/MensRights | 08/02/24 12:00 AM |
| 8 | "Feminazi Fundamentalist" complains about the popularity of high heels for women, in spite of the fact the scientific studies she cited in this article, have shown that both men and women find such footwear attractive.Inquire the exact same "Feminazis" on whether they have a problem with men having to wear suits in the workplace and then we could, perhaps, have a constructive conversation. Besides, it is not even a requirement in the vast majority of workplaces, so why even throw a hissy fit about it? Do they fear facing judgment calls from other women to such an extent, which is why they eventually end up wearing them after all? | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 11:35 PM |
| 5 | "Feminazi Fundamentalist" complains about the popularity of high heels for women, in spite of the fact the scientific studies she cited in this article, have shown that both men and women find such footwear attractive.Exactly, not to mention the fact the global high heels market has experienced a significant increase as of recently: https://www.worldfootwear.com/news/high-heels-footwear-market-to-rise-135-annually-/7783.html In fact, the global high heels market increased by a whooping 8 billion dollars from 2019 to 2024: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1105845/high-heels-market-value-worldwide/ In addition to another scientific study concluding that women spend about 8 billion dollars on high heels annua… | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 11:30 PM |
| 18 | "Feminazi Fundamentalist" complains about the popularity of high heels for women, in spite of the fact the scientific studies she cited in this article, have shown that both men and women find such footwear attractive.Ironically, the author of the above article describes herself as a "high heel aficionado", yet simoultaneously complains that high heels are supposedly "Sexist". | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 10:36 PM |
| 19 | "Feminazi Fundamentalist" complains about the popularity of high heels for women, in spite of the fact the scientific studies she cited in this article, have shown that both men and women find such footwear attractive.Ironically, the author of the above article describes herself as a "high heel aficionado", yet simoultaneously complains that high heels are supposedly "Sexist". | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 10:29 PM |
| 4 | "Feminazi Fundamentalist" complains about the popularity of high heels for women, in spite of the fact the scientific studies she cited in this article, have shown that both men and women find such footwear attractive.Furthermore, she also erroneously stated that high heels are oftentimes condemned and decried as supposedly "Sexist", by "Feminazis" perhaps. I have never once encountered a woman perceiving high heels in such a manner, even more so than claiming that men wearing suits is "Sexist". And lastly, she also included her own subjective experience, claiming that women in high heels are supposedly more likely to face catcalling when compared to women in flat footwear. This directly contradicts the findi… | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 10:00 PM |
| 1 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.The article included various polls as well as scientific studies published in the "Journal Of Bisexuality". I guess you overlooked the aforementioned information for whatever reason? | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 06:30 PM |
| 1 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.Absolutely, anything that "Feminazis" claim should be automatically disregarded altogether, unless proven otherwise. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 06:29 PM |
| 1 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.In regards to Homosexual men refusing to date Bisexual men, obviously. However, when it comes to women themselves, they happen to consider Bisexual men to he less "Masculine", therefore they avoid them altogether. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 06:27 PM |
| 0 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.Not by a long shot. And this has absolutely nothing to do with religion, even in Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece, Homosexuality was severely stigmatised, with the sole exception of powerful men exerting their dominance when it comes to having sexual relations with underage boys. And do not even get me started in regards to what happens in "Atheist" Asia, or the former Soviet Union. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 06:23 PM |
| 1 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.Just like Libtards decrying sexually explicit images of women in magazines, music, movies and especially video games. Libtards do not actually practice what they preach. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 06:17 PM |
| 2 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.Indeed, men are simply more direct and upfront about their opinions and prefernces. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 06:14 PM |
| 2 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.I would not necessarily state this, as scientific research has confirmed that both men and women are attracted to partners who moderate sexual histories. Too little or too much sexual experience is certainly unattractive, regardless of gender that is. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 06:12 PM |
| 2 | Women are significantly less likely to date Bisexual men when compared to men dating Bisexual women. This once again debunks the "Feminazi" propaganda about so called "Toxic Masculinity" supposedly leading to Homophobia.Especially so called "Progressive" women, they happen to be the most hypocritical in this respect. And scientific studies prove this, as highly educated women are significantly more likely to be attracted to wealthy men. They do not refer to it as the "Regressive Left" for no reason at all. | /r/MensRights | 07/02/24 06:04 PM |
| 1 | Reassessing Male Sex Trafficking StatisticsMaybe he was labeled as such because he happened to be a prostitute?. I do not know. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 03:27 PM |
| 1 | Reassessing Male Sex Trafficking StatisticsHollywood has he highest rates of sexual abuse as well as child sexual abuse when compared to any other institution or organisation. Yet you do not see any "Radical Feminazi" calling them out on such reprehensible behaviour. Notwithstanding because Hollywood is filled to the brim with such "Progressive" troglodytes and "Feminazis" so they do not care in the slightest. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 03:26 PM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Much like the "FemaleDatingStrategy", "Dark Feminine Energy" as well as the "Femcel" communities represent "Toxic Femininity" as well, correct? It should be noted that "Dark Feminine Energy" content on TikTok alone has surpassed 1 billion views, which corresponds to about 15% of the entire global population. Such content teaches women to utilise their appearance and feminine charm, in order to manipulate wealthy men into bankrolling their entire lifestyles. Yet individuals such as Andrew Tate ar… | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 02:24 PM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Then how come "Feminazis" such as yourself, erroneously assume that women do not enter in STEM fields because of supposed "Sexism" and not as a result of their own personal decisions and preferences, in spite of scientific evidence imploring otherwise? https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/the-global-educational-gender-equality-paradox-the-more-gender-equality-in-a-country-the-fewer-women-in-stem/ | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 02:16 PM |
| 2 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Absolute "Radical Feminazi" nonsense, so called "unequal distribution" of housework does not lead to women initiating the overwhelming majority of divorces. Women take up on a larger housework burden, because their partners simply take up on a larger financial burden, which you conveniently ignore obviously: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-breadwinner-husband-still-matters-in-marriage/ Around half of all married women either work part time or do not work at all, yet you expect their partners whic… | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 01:51 PM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Upwards of 70% of divorces are actually initiated by women themselves. I have encountered many women that initiated divorce procedures for the most baseless reasons. Anecdotal evidence does not constitute credible evidence, which is why I have not utilised such examples either. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 01:30 PM |
| 2 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.The fact that men are expected to be the primary breadwinners has significantly negative impacts to their mental health, which constitutes one of the many reasons on why men have 3 times the suicide rate of women: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-breadwinner-husband-still-matters-in-marriage/ Everything else that you highlighted is just baseless excuses and anecdotal evidence so as to justify "Sexist" behaviour on behalf of women. You should actually be ashamed of yourself. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 01:25 PM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.This should not surprise you in the slightest, as additional scientific studies have resulted in similar conclusions: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men Your mother is another case in it's entirety, she actually happens to be in an abusive relationship, which appears to be reciprocal from your description. The fact that she literally believes that all men are inherently violent and should avoid putting hands on women, whi… | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 01:13 PM |
| 2 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.One of the many problems of being raised by "Feminazis". | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 01:07 PM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.As I personally understand it, the commenter above is not necessarily in favour of specific gender norms, but more so in regards to their necessity if one desires to maintain a relationship with a woman. Since women require such gender norms to be preserved, other men must follow suit otherwise they will end up alone. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 01:02 PM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Of course, because such men were usually raised by "Feminazis" themselves(as the commenter above stated as well). I have never once claimed the women in my family to be "Feminazis", quite the contrary actually. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 12:31 PM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Appreciate your effort mate. Take care! | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 12:22 PM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Exactly, do not forget the overwhelming majority of criminals are usually raised by single mothers as well. Every single aggresive and violent man I have ever encountered, was encouraged to behave in such a manner by his mother. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 11:57 AM |
| 1 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Absolutely, they go out of their way to date such men, which imparts them in no different fashion than the "Incels" who go out of their way to date terrible women and eventually place all of them in the same bracket. But it should not surprise you in the slightest, considering the fact that "Feminazis" are usually married to other "Male Feminists", since according to scientific studies, the overwhelming majority of marriages are constructed with individuals of the same political orientation, as … | /r/MensRights | 02/02/24 11:49 AM |
| 3 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Of course a man should treat their partner equally, but with strong boundaries to boot. If such boundaries are ever crossed, the man is obligated to show her the door. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 11:32 AM |
| 6 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Only "Feminists" perhaps, I have never encountered a woman that does not identify as such, claiming that she finds "Feminine" men to be more attractive when compared to more "Masculine" ones. Regardless, taking dating advice from "Feminists" is the equivalent of taking advice on human rights from ISIS. Such concepts bear no resemblance to each other, as they are basically completely and utterly contradictory. P.S. Men lie about their personal preferences as well, especially in regards to weight … | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 11:30 AM |
| 2 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.But women do not peddle "lies" about what they actually desire, quite the contrary actually. My own mother and sister have been open and brazen in regards of the need of the adoption of more "Masculine" personality characteristics if one is posited to be successful with women. Notice that I am referring to healthy iterations of "Masculinity", as one can be "Masculine" and continue being a "good" individual. Mentally deranged women are attracted to men that disrespect them and cross their boundar… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 11:24 AM |
| 5 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Not by a long shot, in fact, according to various scientific studies, women who score high in "Emophilia"(e.g as in, falling in love fast without carefully veting the prospective partner initially)are significantly more likely to be attracted to men that possess "Dark Triad" personality characteristics: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886920305092 Like attracts like, as the old saying goes. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 11:14 AM |
| 5 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Exactly, literally every single individual I am aware of that bemoans how terrible the opposite sex happens to be, is usually attracted to and keeps dating some of the most toxic individuals out there. Regardless of gender that is. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 11:03 AM |
| -2 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Sure he does, but Andrew Tate is in prison right now as we are speaking(as he should of course). Whereas individuals like "TheWizardLiz" or "SheraSeven" are out there spitting their monnse and scamming women, without any repercussions whatsoever. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 11:02 AM |
| 6 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.By mentally deranged women perhaps. Although most mentally stable women are still attracted to healthy iterations of "Masculinity" still. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 02:41 AM |
| 10 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Scientific studies have actually indicated that men have significantly worse mental health as a result of the pressure to be the primary breadwinners. If anything, all the household burden the commenter above highlighted does not result in high suicide rates amongst women of course. I am actually confused on what constitutes the actual "Male Privilege" here. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 02:12 AM |
| 11 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Unless you ignore the fact that men usually fill the breadwinner role, including performing the majority of financial decision planning, household and car repairs, yardwork, driving the children to school/extracurriculars, taking out the rubbish... You know, all of these hard and mentally taxing chores that "Feminists" conveniently ignore, because they fall on behalf of men of course. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 02:10 AM |
| 4 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Alright. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 02:01 AM |
| 7 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.You actually described the "Duluth Model". Such a pseudoscientific model has been discredited and debunked by multiple scientists already and has been abandoned by other countries in favour of scientifically accurate and more inclusive alternatives, encompassing domestic violence associated behaviours and risks related to both sexes: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model The CDC for example has concluded that around half of all domestic violence victims are men, which signifies a near gen… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 01:53 AM |
| 4 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.I would not necessarily state that women are attracted to "domineering" men that disrespect their boundaries. Damaged women perhaps, but high quality women can effectively and successfully distinguish healthy conceptions of "Masculinity" over the unhealthy ones. P.S. In all actuality, the more "Feminist" the woman is, the more likely she is to be attracted to the most "toxic" iterations of "Masculinity" out there, whereas women that do not identify as such, have significantly healthier relations… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 01:34 AM |
| 24 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Heck, even self-proclaimed "Feminists" do not actually practice what they preach: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 01:31 AM |
| 4 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.I did not notice at all, appreciate your submission mate! P.S. Fixed it nevertheless. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 01:30 AM |
| 33 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Very true, it is as if "Feminist" grifters actually believe the only way women can succeed in society is though entirely altering their entire personalities so as to acquire traits associated with the opposite sex(which they also condemn of course). Incredibly "Sexist" as well as dehumanising if you ask me. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/24 01:26 AM |
| 6 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Something that "Feminist" grifters conveniently ignore however. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 11:19 PM |
| 12 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society."Of course, All of our instincts are based on evolutionary biology. Men want young fertile beautiful women. Because of the high cost of bearing children women look for men with the resources to support those children, and the physical ability to protect her in the children. IE muscles and height. This isn’t any sort of revelation?" This is something that "Feminists" conveniently ignore however. "What we don’t like is “toxic masculinity”. Masculine I’m all in! The more Alpha (for me) the better! … | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 11:15 PM |
| 4 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.Appreciate your input! | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 11:08 PM |
| 116 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.In all actuality, the more "Feminist" the woman is, the more likely she is to be attracted to the most "toxic" forms of "Masculinity", whereas women that do not identify as such, have significantly healthier relationship patterns and dynamics. At least, in accordance with my own personal experiences and observations. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 09:56 PM |
| 67 | Women reward more "Masculine" men in various ways, not only are such men more likely to be married, they also tend to be happier as a result. Such findings debunk the "Feminazi" propaganda about men supposedly enforcing the vast majority of gender norms in society.The above findings are in accordance with other associated scientific studies, in addition to commentary by women themselves on social media, fawning over men such as Travis Kelce or Chase Stokes: https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/are-hunky-men-back-in-demand In fact, in more "Liberal" and "Egalitarian" countries, women are actually more likely to be attracted to men that possess more "Masculine" facial features: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-39350-8 Two other scientific studies als… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 09:20 PM |
| 1 | The overwhelming majority of apprehended political prisoners in Belarus are actually men. Even flagrantly "Authoritarian" dictatorships give women preferential treatment.Yet "Feminazi Fundamentalists" continue to propagate the "Pseudoscientific" theory of the so called "Patriarchy" and supposed widespread "discrimination against women". The iron law of "Radical Feminazism" is that whatever "Feminazis" claim to believe, automatically assume the exact opposite. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 09:23 AM |
| 1 | The overwhelming majority of apprehended political prisoners in Belarus are actually men. Even flagrantly "Authoritarian" dictatorships give women preferential treatment.Yet "Feminazi Fundamentalists" continue to propagate the "Pseudoscientific" theory of the so called "Patriarchy" and supposed widespread "discrimination against women". The iron law of "Radical Feminazism" is that whatever "Feminazis" claim to believe, automatically assume the exact opposite. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 09:20 AM |
| 1 | The overwhelming majority of apprehended political prisoners in Belarus are actually men. Even flagrantly "Authoritarian" dictatorships give women preferential treatment.Interesting, I was not aware of that. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 09:12 AM |
| 1 | The overwhelming majority of apprehended political prisoners in Belarus are actually men. Even flagrantly "Authoritarian" dictatorships give women preferential treatment.To be honest, Russia has imposed a moratorium on capital punishment since 1996, with no state sanctioned executions being performed ever since. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/24 09:12 AM |
| 3 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Or because they can actually obtain all of the above? I assume that attractive men would have similarly elevated standards in all clusters as well. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 04:26 AM |
| 5 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Definitely, as they already fear for their safety when they encounter "Male Feminist" troglodytes such as the following: https://archive.fo/qdDCc "Incels" and "Male Feminists" are more alike than dissimilar. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 04:24 AM |
| 3 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Incorrect, cultural influences(while important in and of themselves)do not have such a strong an effect as you would like to assume yourself. Specific characteristics are universally attractive, such as men with higher incomes and more education for example: https://ifstudies.org/blog/on-internet-dating-sites-women-prefer-men-with-higher-incomes-and-more-education Men with more "Masculine" faces: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-39350-8 As well as men that are taller: https://www.scien… | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 04:07 AM |
| 1 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.I do not blame them in the slightest mate. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 03:58 AM |
| 3 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Of course she should want all of the above characteristics. I am not an "Incel" myself, I am simply sharing such scientific studies for the sake of science in and of itself. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 03:56 AM |
| 1 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Of course it is not, attractive individuals would obviously have elevated standards in various clusters because they can get away with it. Men included as well. P.S. According to the scientific study I linked, only women low in mate value do in fact pursue a "Dual Mating Strategy", because they can escape the manifold costs of exposed infidelity. Since women high in "Dark Triad" as well as "Borderline Personality Disorder" personality characteristics are significantly more likely to engage in in… | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 03:50 AM |
| 1 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Including both "Masculinity" and high earning potential. But I am generally in agreement with the rest of your points nevertheless. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 03:26 AM |
| 2 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Incorrect. While women actually desire more "Masculine" men, they actually despise men with "Dark Triad" characteristics. At least the ones that are not mentally deranged themselves. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 03:21 AM |
| 5 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Because men do not have to deal with unrealistic beauty standards and expectations. Eyeroll. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 03:20 AM |
| 14 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.And according to the exact same source you provided yourself, in the majority of marriages(e.g 55%), the man is still the primary or sole breadwinner. While the number of marriages where both partners earn the same income has indeed increased as time has progressed, the number of marriages where the woman is the primary or sole breadwinner has basically stayed stagnant over the last two decades. An aspect that actually makes sense, since women usually will only consider men that either make the … | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/01/24 03:03 AM |
| 27 | Attractive women want it all: Good genetics, economic investment, parenting proclivities and emotional commitment.Another important finding can also be derived from the scientific study above, in that, contrary to erroneous assertions put forward by the "BlackPill", only a minority of women engage in a so called "Dual Mating Strategy", as in seeking economic investment from one man and good genetics from another. Since the overwhelming majority of women and especially the ones high in mate value seek to obtain economic investment and good genetics from the same man however, they will eventually attempt to s… | /r/BlackPillScience | 08/01/24 08:20 AM |
| 5 | Individuals that score high on "Emophilia"(e.g a trait associated with general insecurity and desire to eschew boundaries and rush fast into relationships)are significantly more likely to be attracted to "Dark Triad" individuals.Majority of individuals in this subreddit are Heterosexual men. The description of this subreddit is as irrelevant as North Korea claiming to be a "Democracy". | /r/BlackPillScience | 31/12/23 02:47 AM |
| 6 | Individuals that score high on "Emophilia"(e.g a trait associated with general insecurity and desire to eschew boundaries and rush fast into relationships)are significantly more likely to be attracted to "Dark Triad" individuals.Of course, but this subreddit is related to particular sexual strategies targetting women so... | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 07:47 PM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Scientific research is definitely not "stupid". If you disagree with the findings of the aforementioned scientific study, you are free to refute them by publishing your own. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:57 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Correlation does not imply causation. How many times should the above quote be highlighted? | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:55 PM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Correlation does not imply causation. How many times should the above quote be highlighted? | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:54 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".From my link: "We conclude that asexuality and autism share various aspects, such as a possible role of prenatal factors, reference to romantic dimensions of sexual attraction and sexual orientation, and non-partner-oriented sexual desire, but future research should explore and clarify this link." It appears you conveniently ignored over some really important information down at the bottom. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:53 PM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Scientific research indicates otherwise. Also, I have never once stated that "Asexuality" does not exist, but only that many self-proclaimed "Asexuals" can be more accurately described as "Hyposexuals" than the reverse. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:50 PM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Scientific research indicates otherwise. Also, I have never once stated that "Asexuality" does not exist, but only that many self-proclaimed "Asexuals" can be more accurately described as "Hyposexuals" than the reverse. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:49 PM |
| 8 | Contrary to popular misconceptions, "Psychopaths" are actually more likely to commit suicide when compared to the rest of the population.Including the fact they are significantly more likely to end up in prison because they usually violate the law. Eyeroll. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:15 PM |
| 15 | Individuals that score high on "Emophilia"(e.g a trait associated with general insecurity and desire to eschew boundaries and rush fast into relationships)are significantly more likely to be attracted to "Dark Triad" individuals.Translation: Mentally deranged women chase after mentally deranged men. Such women you are going to attract if you idolise over "Dark Triad" personalities. Do you really want such women to be honest? | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:08 PM |
| 1 | Contrary to popular misconceptions, "Psychopaths" are actually more likely to commit suicide when compared to the rest of the population.Interesting, appreciate your response. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:04 PM |
| 2 | Contrary to popular misconceptions, "Psychopaths" are actually more likely to commit suicide when compared to the rest of the population.I have never stated otherwise, "Psychopaths" are still more likely to commit suicide when compared to the rest of the population however. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/12/23 03:04 PM |
| 1 | Beware of the hypocritical "Male Feminist", even "Female Feminists" absolutely despise them.This is certainly incorrect. Majority of men and nearly half of women, have voted for Donald Trump in the last two Presidential Elections, an open "Anti-Feminist" mind you: https://cawp.rutgers.edu/gender-gap-voting-choices-presidential-elections Furthermore, just 25% of all Americans and 7% of all Britons identify as such according to polling. The real problem is more akin to why such large swaths of a population outright reject a political movement that is supposed to be about "Gender Equality… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/23 06:37 AM |
| 3 | Beware of the hypocritical "Male Feminist", even "Female Feminists" absolutely despise them."Male Feminists" have absolutely no respect for themselves, so why should others respect them as well? | /r/MensRights | 28/12/23 06:10 AM |
| 3 | Beware of the hypocritical "Male Feminist", even "Female Feminists" absolutely despise them.Which is exactly why a mere 25% of all Americans as well as 7% of all Britons identify as such, according to polling. Heck, even after all the "Women's March" in addition to the "HeForShe" campaign nonsense, White women(which constitute the largest racial demographic in the United States)overwhelmingly voted for Donald Trump in the last two Presidential Elections: https://19thnews.org/2020/11/white-women-had-doubts-they-voted-for-trump-anyway/ That is not to state that I am a supporter of Donald… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/23 06:08 AM |
| 5 | Beware of the hypocritical "Male Feminist", even "Female Feminists" absolutely despise them.Justin Trudeau has been accused of sexual harassment and also wearing racist black-face. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" do not practice what they preach. Hopefully, he gets booted out in the next general election(which appears to be very likely according to various polls). | /r/MensRights | 28/12/23 05:54 AM |
| 17 | Beware of the hypocritical "Male Feminist", even "Female Feminists" absolutely despise them.Even though I am in agreement with the general premise of the above article, I still have to highlight some misconceptions attached to it(since it is written by a "Feminazi" after all). In spite of herself accurately condemning "Male Feminists" for unfairly scrutinizing other women such as Tomi Lahren, she fails to take into consideration that "Female Feminists" can be just as despicable in doing so. And in case you have any doubts, refer to how "Feminazis" treated Melania Trump or Christina Hof… | /r/MensRights | 27/12/23 03:53 AM |
| 19 | Contrary to popular misconceptions, "Psychopaths" are actually more likely to commit suicide when compared to the rest of the population.The aforementioned variable is mostly related to various malevolent attributes associated with "Psychopathy" such as increased "pain tolerance", "reckless indifference to human life", "fearlessness about death" as well as "general apathy". | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/12/23 03:07 AM |
| 1 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Indeed it was! | /r/MensRights | 24/12/23 12:41 AM |
| 1 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Both of the examples you shared pertain politicians. Of course politicians will never be "canceled" for anything they utter. Even the likes of Donald Trump have not been "canceled" for worse. The elites are basically untouchable at this point, censorship is only allied to Plebeian dregs like is. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/23 12:16 AM |
| 1 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".The article I shared in my response to you is referencing "Feminists" so... | /r/MensRights | 24/12/23 12:14 AM |
| 1 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Which is exactly why only 25% of women identify as "Feminists" in the end. In fact, the overwhelming majority of White women themselves(the largest female racial demographic that is)voted for Donald Trump in the last two presidential elections: https://www.thecut.com/2020/11/many-white-women-still-voted-for-trump-in-2020.html "Feminazis" cannot understand that by peddling extremism and delusional conspiracy theories, they simply push women in the exact opposite direction. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/23 12:11 AM |
| 2 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".In my own experience at least, women have been some of the biggest enforcers of traditional gender roles. An uncomfortable fact that many "Feminists" are unwilling to acknowledge of course. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/23 12:05 AM |
| 1 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Perhaps, although I would still argue that such "Feminists" are definitely rare and not a part of the mainstream for sure. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 02:42 PM |
| 5 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".The scientific study embedded in the article above included many women, of various backgrounds that is. Although, there is even more to it than that, below is another gold from a(surprisingly)"Feminist" author: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 02:39 PM |
| 3 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Indeed, homosexual relationships between men also share the same dynamic. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 02:37 PM |
| 7 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".There is even more to it than that, below is another gold from a(surprisingly)"Feminist" author: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 08:41 AM |
| 7 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Even homosexual relationships between women are usually oriented towards a more "Dominant" partner(e.g the "Butch")as well as a more "Submissive" one(e.g the "Femme"). | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 08:39 AM |
| 5 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".The scientific study above highlighted the fact that women were found to be significantly happier in their relationships when they perceived their partner as a leader, even if the exact opposite was actually the case. It is all about "perceptions" as well as "keeping up the pretenses" in the end. Below is the relevant scientific study embedded in the article above, in order to clear some misconceptions you might have(understandably so of course): https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/026… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 08:35 AM |
| 2 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".But "Feminists" are actually never making such assertions however? They usually place the blame solely on men for the persistence of specific gender expectations and norms in society. While simultaneously absolving all the responsibility from women in the process(e.g imagining de-facto female hypoagency because such a doctrine benefits them). P.S. According to a recent scientific study, even self-proclaimed "Feminists" were found to be attracted to more "Masculine" men: https://www.psychologytod… | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 08:29 AM |
| 5 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Sure, here you go mate: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02654075211017670 | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 08:26 AM |
| 2 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Well, I can safely attest your "mistake" was simply marrying a "Feminist" in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 08:25 AM |
| 20 | Many women are absolutely "Sexist", in spite of "Feminist Fundamentalists" claiming otherwise. According to a recent scientific study, women were found to be happier in their relationships when their partner had more "power".Apparently, it is definitely the so called "Patriarchy" demanding men to fill the leadership role in their own relationships and obviously not the other way around. Correct? | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 03:33 AM |
| 3 | I have never encountered a more "Sexist" video in my life and I definitely do not utilise such a word lightly. Said video was actually created by a "Feminist", bonus points if you scroll through all of the toxic comments accompanying it.They cannot even comprehend their own hypocrisy. Absolutely despicable. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 02:23 AM |
| 2 | I have never encountered a more "Sexist" video in my life and I definitely do not utilise such a word lightly. Said video was actually created by a "Feminist", bonus points if you scroll through all of the toxic comments accompanying it.A prime example of "Schrodinger's Feminism" that is. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/23 02:23 AM |
| 11 | I have never encountered a more "Sexist" video in my life and I definitely do not utilise such a word lightly. Said video was actually created by a "Feminist", bonus points if you scroll through all of the toxic comments accompanying it.As you can see, so called "Toxic Masculinity" is just another insult individuals throw around, similarly to "Incel". Just another meaningless buzzword. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 01:26 PM |
| 1 | I have never encountered a more "Sexist" video in my life and I definitely do not utilise such a word lightly. Said video was actually created by a "Feminist", bonus points if you scroll through all of the toxic comments accompanying it.If you do not mind me asking, how can you identify as a "Feminist" and an "MRA" simultaneously? | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 09:00 AM |
| 2 | I have never encountered a more "Sexist" video in my life and I definitely do not utilise such a word lightly. Said video was actually created by a "Feminist", bonus points if you scroll through all of the toxic comments accompanying it.Baseless excuses in order to justify their revolting "Sexism". | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 07:32 AM |
| 12 | I have never encountered a more "Sexist" video in my life and I definitely do not utilise such a word lightly. Said video was actually created by a "Feminist", bonus points if you scroll through all of the toxic comments accompanying it.For the women in the comments section complaining about all of the "abusive" and "toxic" men they dated, I would definitely advise them to take a hard look in the mirror. One mentioned that her former partner got in trouble with the law, whereas another highlighted that her former partner refused to move out of his parent's accommodation and eventually get his own apartment. Fair enough, I am not defending either of the above, but if you take into account the first one was a victim of childhood … | /r/MensRights | 22/12/23 05:41 AM |
| 11 | According to the "Office Of National Statistics" in the United Kingdom, even though women reported they were more likely to be "worried" about being victims of crime, men were still more likely to be victims of crime.Perhaps, this is because women are(generally speaking)more likely to share and air their concerns when compared to men. I assume that men are as likely to suffer fear of being victims of crime, but they are simply less likely to express it. Although the data above indicated that women were significantly more likely to be victims of domestic and sexual violence, I suppose this is the result of men being less likely to report such offences. P.S. If anyone can offer accurate data in regards to actu… | /r/MensRights | 20/12/23 11:51 AM |
| 6 | Refer to the 4th definition of that term and observe the rampant misinformation spread by a "Feminazi"(in addition to the much expected downvotes).First things first, the "Feminazi" above promotes the delusional conspiracy theory, pertaining that women supposedly gained equal rights only recently, in spite of the fact that across both the 19th and 20th centuries plenty of men did not enjoy equal rights either(especially impoverished, minority and LGBT men). Then she mentioned the debunked lie that female rulers are supposedly more "peaceful" when compared to male ones, even though female rulers have been 27% more likely to incite wars than… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/23 06:35 AM |
| 1 | I'm going to be involved in a study about attitudes towards Dick Pics. Let's discuss."In what do you find attractive surveys women often list the penis as the most attractive." Not true in the slightest. In fact, upper body, abs and buttocks are consistently picked by women as the most attractive male body parts. Although "Feminazis" still bash men that send shirtless pictures nevertheless. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/23 02:22 AM |
| 2 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts.I assume the reason many perpetrators of sexual violence never face punishment is because victims oftentimes refuse to report their cases to the police. Part of it also pertains to the shortages of rape kits as you highlighted as well. This does not necessarily offer "proof" about a non-existent "anti-female" and "pro-rapist" bias within the criminal justice system as "Feminists" erroneously allege however(in addition to a "passive" culture of victim blaming). And finally, in regards to consent … | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 11:18 PM |
| 1 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts.This is another "Woke" book, erroneously claiming that women have somehow been "erased" from history, because historians and academics refused to mention them in their respective works. In spite of the fact this is another fabricated "Feminist" myth that has eventually been debunked. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts.Obviously that is correct, but only a registration is required. Nobody is compelled to serve in the military in any capacity. Although I definitely understand how this is unfair, since it only pertains to men, therefore I do ineed support it's eventual abolition. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 09:58 PM |
| 4 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts.Excellent find! | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 09:31 PM |
| 1 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts."Feminists" have actually protested against the prohibition of either the hijab or the burka in both France and Canada. In both of the aforementioned countries, the proposition was actually forwarded by "Conservative" political formations and caused much controversy amongst the "Left". Especially in Canada, where it was actually Quebec itself, one of the country's most "Conservative" provinces, that came into disrepute with the Justin Trudeau Administration. It goes without saying, this ought no… | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 09:24 PM |
| 2 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts.Indeed, while military conscription was officially abolished by the Richard Nixon Administration in 1973. Basically, many decades later. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 09:18 PM |
| 4 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts.They do not give a toss about mothers either. I mean, they are the ones that constantly attack women for choosing motherhood after all. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 09:11 PM |
| 17 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts.If it was not for avowed "White Supremacist" Woodrow Wilson and corrupt scoundrel Richard Nixon, establishing female suffrage and affording women financial independence without their husbands' permission respectively, they would have all been residing in huts right now. None of the above political figures ever identified as "Feminists" mind you. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 08:14 AM |
| 22 | Never forget that "Feminists" have never actually fought for women's rights, unless we are referring to privileged women that is. During the campaign for female suffrage, Theocratic "White Supremacist Feminists" threw minority women under the bus in favour of their White counterparts.Theocratic "Feminist Fundamentalists" also played a leading role in the spearheading of Alcohol Prohibition in the United States. Not to mention they also assisted the Bill Clinton Administration back in the 1990's, in it's short-lived and albeit failed attempt to prohibit everything from Pornography and firearms to violent video games and particular genres of music. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/23 08:01 AM |
| 1 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Andrew Tate is currently in prison(as he should be of course)and according to polling, just 25% of young men have ever heard of him. In direct contrast, "Sexist" and toxic female influencers such as "TheWizardLiz"(with over 10 MILLION subscribers and followers on both YouTube and TikTok and counting)are still allowed to spread their vile hatred without any repercussions whatsoever. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 08:39 PM |
| 1 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Depends on the woman to be honest. In my own experience, non "Feminist" women are brutally honest about their desires. It is actually the "Feminists" that everyone should ignore. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 08:33 PM |
| 2 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.They seriously uttered such nonsense? | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 08:28 PM |
| 3 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Absolutely, such a phenomenon reminds me of Religious Fundamentalists condemning Homosexuality as "immoral", eventually revealing themselves to be closeted Homosexuals in the process. Similarly to how avowed "Male Feminists" usually reveal themselves to be some of the biggest abusers of women. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 08:25 PM |
| 1 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes."I love masculine men. I don't like misogynistic men. Those don't have to go hand in hand. The unhappiest women I know are those in relationships with conservative and possessive men. They experience restrictions and some even violence and other cruelties. This is what I would call toxic." According to a multitude of scientific studies, wealthy men with "extreme" political beliefs tend to experience higher relationship quality and satisfaction, with such a finding being especially pronounced for… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:46 PM |
| 1 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.The article above utilised such terminology, I did not come up with the term "Woke" mate. And in case you have any doubts, the author of the article above is actually a "Feminist" himself. P.S. Also, making a distinction between the "bedroom" and what is supposedly acceptable outside of it misses the point entirely. If being "Dominant" in the bedroom is somehow acceptable, then so should being "Dominant" outside of it. Besides, the article above only refered to non-sexual relationship dynamics, … | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 06:51 PM |
| 2 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.The article above utilised such terminology, I did not come up with the term "Woke" mate. And in case you have any doubts, the author of the article above is actually a "Feminist" himself. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 06:49 PM |
| 1 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.I see, apology accepted then mate. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 03:42 PM |
| 5 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Of course they are, but the problem is that "Feminists" are labeling ALL "Masculinity" as "Sexist" and horrible, discouraging men from adopting such attributes, even though they are secretly attracted to them. And nobody is "pushing" any "Toxic Masculinity" on young men, I do not know where you got that idea from mate. In fact, it is actually the "Feminists" who are the real grifters here. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 03:37 PM |
| 7 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.See, I personally do not have a problem with individuals(regardless of gender)being attracted to whatever they desire. However, it is incredibly hypocritical for "Feminists" to bash "Masculinity", while they are simultaneously attracted to such attributes, innit? | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 03:35 PM |
| 11 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.You are referring to R/Menslib, correct? | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 03:28 PM |
| 6 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.They have many blogs, where mental health professionals share their perspectives on various topics. Some of them are "Liberals" while others are "Conservatives". | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 01:16 PM |
| 12 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.But the problem is that "Feminists" label all "Masculinity" as toxic so... | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 01:14 PM |
| 8 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Indeed, but the problem is that "Feminists" have a tendency to label all "Masculinity" as toxic so... | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 01:13 PM |
| 2 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Exactly, the authors of the scientific study above investigated the women on how "Feminist" they happened to be, in addition to placing them in distinct categories so as to ascertain on whether any discernible differences could be observed. Yet even after they compared both of the aforementioned groups, self-proclaimed "Feminists" were still found to be attracted to such attributes as much as the opposite cohort. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 01:11 PM |
| 4 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.The scientific study above did not only refer to "women", but it also looked into whether any discernible differences could be observed between "Feminists" and non "Feminists" alike. Since you did not even pay the slightest bit of attention to the scientific study or the article, I simply have to assume that you are trolling at this point. P.S. The desire for "Egalitarian" relationships is absolutely one of the fundamental pillars of "Feminism". Most non "Feminists" would obviously state they ar… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 12:59 PM |
| 1 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.The article above utilised such terminology, I did not come up with the term "Woke" mate. And in case you have any doubts, the author of the article above is actually a "Feminist" himself. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 12:49 PM |
| 16 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Yet in spite of their paranoid delusions, "Conservatives" are significantly more likely to be married(67%)than "Progressives"(45%)and even "Independents"(52%). And not only that, they also tend to experience greater levels of commitment and also enjoy higher relationship quality and satisfaction when compared to "Progressives" and "Feminists": https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8266382/ They might erroneously allege that women are somehow not attracted to more "Masculine" or "Conservat… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 12:22 PM |
| 9 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Perhaps, I should not have utilised such terminology in my post. However, my point still stands. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 12:16 PM |
| 6 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Are you trolling me mate? "Women, nevertheless, report liking men with BS attitudes (Barreto & Ellemers, 2005; Kilianski & Rudman, 1998) and even find them more attractive than non-BS men (Bohner, Ahlborn, & Steiner, 2010). Evidence shows that many women—even those who desire egalitarian relationships—want a man to be chivalrous, by, for example, paying for dates and opening doors for them (Lamont, 2014; Lever, Frederick, & Hertz, 2015). Given its harmful effects, it is important to understand w… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 12:08 PM |
| 5 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.The only women I know who are currently with "deadbeat" men, are usually low quality women themselves. Like attracts like, as the old saying goes. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 12:04 PM |
| 14 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.The scientific study above included BOTH "Feminist" and non "Feminist" women, in order to ascertain on whether such findings apply to individuals across the ideological spectrum. The surprising conclusion of the study was that even self-proclaimed "Feminist" women were found to be attracted to such attributes. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 10:53 AM |
| 18 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Apparently you missed the following quote? "Women who were both more and less feminist displayed similar levels of attraction to sexist men, so this effect isn’t the result of women not being “woke” enough." https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 10:45 AM |
| 19 | Self-proclaimed "Feminists" actually think that "Masculine" men are significantly more attractive than "Woke" ones, according to a recent scientific study. Never forget that "Feminazis" might condemn so called "Toxic Masculinity" themselves, yet they are secretly attracted to such attributes.Hypocrisy much? | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 10:03 AM |
| 2 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?This has been my personal experience as well. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:24 AM |
| 1 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?I am simply speaking from personal experience mate. If you have a different perspective, fine. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:23 AM |
| 1 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Of course I do. In fact, a mere 25% of all women in the United States identity as such, according to polling. Although "Feminists" are no better either: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:20 AM |
| 1 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Personally, I am of the opinion that consenting adults should have the freedom to conduct their own relationships however they see fit. But I am obviously against the cultural pressure to behave or not in a certain way. My post was directed mostly towards the hypocritical "Feminists", erroneously alleging it's mostly men putting the pressure on other men to behave in a specific manner, when there exist plenty of examples, like the woman in the video above, to the contrary. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:18 AM |
| 2 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?The problem is that "Feminists" place the blame solely on men, in regards to the preservation of specific gender expectations and norms in society that is. While simultaneously and conveniently ignoring the female part of the equation of course. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:13 AM |
| 1 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?She does not identify as a "Feminist" as far as I am concerned. Although there always exist the likes of "TheWizardLiz", self-proclaimed "Feminists" that push for traditional gender roles. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:11 AM |
| 1 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Including a multitude of scientific studies such as the following: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/women-stronger-men-attraction-looks-muscles-weak-study-dating-a8105976.html https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/feelings/dominant-men-attract-more-women-study-2812374/ https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/women-happier-relationship-man-more-power-research | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:06 AM |
| 1 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?The overwhelming majority of individuals accused of sexual harassment/assault during the #Metoo era were self-proclaimed "Male Feminists" themselves. Heck, the entire political movement started as a result of Harvey Weinstein himself, eventually collapsing into irrelevancy as time progressed. At least, the hypocrisy of self-proclaimed "Male Feminists" was aired out for the whole word to observe. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 07:00 AM |
| 2 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?I noticed that as well. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 06:55 AM |
| 2 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?By investing in self-improvement, it becomes literally impossible to not find a high quality woman interested in yourself. Moreover, once you start your glow-up journey, women will start to gravitate themselves towards you. Trust me, I speak from experience. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/23 06:53 AM |
| 9 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Which is not my assertion in the slightest. When a substantial proportion of the population showcases specific dating preferences, they tend to become the norm(in this case, since the overwhelming majority of women do find "Masculine" men to be significantly more attractive, of course men will feel the pressure to conform to such expectations). I do not give a toss about the dating preferences of the woman above or others for that matter, but when "Feminists" consistently place the blame solely … | /r/MensRights | 13/12/23 02:29 PM |
| 8 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Indeed, but one gender typically shoulders most of the blame. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/23 02:27 PM |
| 10 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?The problem with that notion is that "Feminists" never want to accept the fact that women also contribute to the preservation of specific gender expectations and norms in society, while simultaneously placing all the blame solely on men themselves. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/23 09:52 AM |
| 8 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?My gripe is not with the woman above, everyone is entitled to their own dating preferences without having to explain them to others, as you have accurately highlighted yourself. The real problem is that not only men are constantly shamed for their own dating preferences while women avoid any kind of scrutiny whatsoever, but that "Feminists" consistently place the blame solely on men in regards to the preservation of specific gender expectations and norms in society, while conveniently ignoring t… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/23 09:48 AM |
| 18 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Definitely, the problem is that men are constantly shamed for their dating preferences while simultaneously women avoid any kind of scrutiny. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/23 09:44 AM |
| 81 | Another video by a woman, unashamedly admitting women actually desire more "Masculine" men. Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Is it the so called "Patriarchy" and "Internalised Misogyny" again, or perhaps women themselves? | /r/MensRights | 13/12/23 07:03 AM |
| 1 | R/menslib feels like so weird"Feminism" is complete and utter cancer. It is nothing more than a hate movement at this point. If you support that political movement, you indirectly contribute the instances such the one the user you responded to highlighted. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 12/12/23 10:14 PM |
| 2 | R/menslib feels like so weirdNot necessarily, I would personally argue the "chivalrous" mindset is even more ingrained in "Feminists" than in "Conservatives" to be honest. At least, the latter discuss men's issues in addition to the problems and the harms of the "Feminist" movement from time to time. Whereas the former completely ignore, devalue and invalidate such concerns in the first place. Do not forget that MRA's tend to lean right in general. While they are obviously not perfect in and of themselves, they are at least… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 12/12/23 09:35 PM |
| 2 | Never forget that every single "Male Feminist" hypocrite that accused the gaming culture of "Sexism", eventually revealed himself to be a sexual predator.It definitely is a subreddit brimming with "Male Feminists". | /r/MensRights | 11/12/23 06:01 PM |
| 1 | Never forget that every single "Male Feminist" hypocrite that accused the gaming culture of "Sexism", eventually revealed himself to be a sexual predator.Definitely, in addition to Harvey Weistein and Aziz Ansari as well. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/23 06:00 PM |
| 3 | Never forget that every single "Male Feminist" hypocrite that accused the gaming culture of "Sexism", eventually revealed himself to be a sexual predator.This does not surprise me in the slightest to be honest. I guess your friend has learned from her past experience, so as to avoid making the same mistake again(e.g dating another "Male Feminist" hypocrite that is). | /r/MensRights | 10/12/23 11:41 PM |
| 7 | Never forget that every single "Male Feminist" hypocrite that accused the gaming culture of "Sexism", eventually revealed himself to be a sexual predator.They are complete and utter hypocrites. Never allow any female friend and family member near them, if you want to keep them safe that is. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/23 11:39 PM |
| 21 | Never forget that every single "Male Feminist" hypocrite that accused the gaming culture of "Sexism", eventually revealed himself to be a sexual predator.Indeed, this has been the case in my own personal life as well. Fortunately, only two of my female friends and family members have ever been victims of sexual harassment and assault. And in both cases, the culprits were self-proclaimed "Male Feminists" themselves. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/23 07:14 PM |
| 17 | Never forget that every single "Male Feminist" hypocrite that accused the gaming culture of "Sexism", eventually revealed himself to be a sexual predator.Never forget that Theocratic "Male Feminists" absolutely despise women, which is the primary reason on why they perceive and treat them as nothing more than sexual objects. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/23 07:05 PM |
| 2 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite Russell Brand accused of sexual assault. Never forget that Theocratic "Feminists" absolutely despise women, which is why they only threat them as nothing more than sexual objects.Absolutely, I can also attest this has been the case in my own personal life as well. Personally, I have several female friends and family members, most of them(barring two)have never been been victims of any type of sexual harassment/assault(in spite of "Feminists" erroneously assuming that everyone knows at least one woman that has been a victim of such heinous crimes). However, the remaining two have been harassed by self-proclaimed "Male Feminists", at various "Progressive" venues on top of … | /r/MensRights | 10/12/23 05:58 PM |
| 1 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy theories in regards to homicide debunked: According to the "United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime", the overwhelming majority of homicide victims globally are actually men.The overwhelming majority of individuals killed by the police are men, regardless of the racial group they belong. When such a trend can be carefully observed across various demographic groups, then one can realise we have a pattern here. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/23 07:37 PM |
| 1 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy theories in regards to homicide debunked: According to the "United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime", the overwhelming majority of homicide victims globally are actually men.Correct, both are characteristics of "Psychopathy". | /r/MensRights | 08/12/23 07:32 PM |
| 2 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy theories in regards to homicide debunked: According to the "United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime", the overwhelming majority of homicide victims globally are actually men.According to various scientific studies, about 30% of all homicide offenders can be classified as "Psychopaths"(in spite of the fact that only 1% of all the population is comprised of "Psychopaths"): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178918301678 As we all are already aware of, "Psychopaths" are characterised by an unwillingness to empathise with others as well as the inability feel remorse. Literal "Psychopaths" showcase more empathy for women than they do for men. And … | /r/MensRights | 07/12/23 04:24 PM |
| 11 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy theories in regards to homicide debunked: According to the "United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime", the overwhelming majority of homicide victims globally are actually men.Domestic violence related homicide(even though an atrocious phenomenon in and of itself)only comprises a fraction of all homicides globally. In fact, men are, statistically speaking, about 8 times more likely to be victims of homicide when compared to women themselves. And before any "Feminist Fundamentalist" attempts to peddle the oftentimes repeated bollocks about the fact that most homicide offenders are overwhelmingly men(even though accurate, although such an assertion obviously lacks conte… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/23 01:52 AM |
| 1 | The so called "Gold Digger" stereotype has been eventually debunked. Women married to wealthy men actually derive greater enjoyment in their own relationships as well as higher satisfaction in their sex lives(they do not just "put up" with sex for money as many erroneously assume).Contrary to popular belief and stereotypes, women actually do love such men after all, they are not in it just for the money. Women simply place more importance in financial security when compared to men, for various reasons such as ensuring the best possible life for their future family. | /r/BlackPillScience | 06/12/23 06:18 AM |
| 1 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Because individuals' preferences are literally the driving force behind all aspects of society? Are you even listening to yourself mate? P.S. If the above video included men expressing their preferences for more "Feminine" women, your reaction would have been entirely different, perhaps accusing them of "Sexism" and the like. We are both aware this is how it would have turned out eventually, even you have no desire to admit it yourself. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/23 03:44 PM |
| 1 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?You can absolutely and erroneously assume the video above is "irrelevant" because it happens to contradict your preconceived notions and pre-existing biases all you want, however your approach does not necessarily confirm your assumptions here in the slightest. Had the above video included women claiming the exact opposite(e.g they are attracted to more "Feminine" men), you would have definitely affirmed it's message even if it had amassed only 1.000 views over the past 4 years. And in case you … | /r/MensRights | 05/12/23 03:32 PM |
| 1 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?That is because men are thirsty for sexual gratification and validation, although you are otherwise correct nonetheless. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/23 03:21 PM |
| 2 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Some perhaps, although the overwhelming majority of women(regardless of their personal political convictions that is)are generally attracted to "Positive Masculinity" to an extent. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/23 03:19 PM |
| 1 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?If so called "Toxic Masculinity" exists and is supposedly an actual problem so is "Toxic Femininity" as well(and we are both aware you would claim the exact opposite), correct? Or are you "Feminists" keen on placing the blame solely on men so as to further a particular political agenda? Just some food for thought. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/23 03:16 PM |
| 3 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Women absolutely despise any hint of "weakness" in men. Although it is more about never appearing "weak" than constantly trying to appear "strong" in my own experience. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 08:17 PM |
| 7 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?They even attempted to push the narrative of the "sensitive, soft, gentle" man a few years back in romance novels(which are mostly written by women themselves mind you), yet they dropped the entire concept after they realised it did not sell well. Yet "Feminists" continue to place the blame solely on men for the persistence of specific gender expectations and norms in society, in spite of plenty of evidence to the contrary. P.S. In my own experience, the only women that are attracted to "Bad Boy… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 07:14 PM |
| 2 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?They literally interviewed women from various backgrounds in one of the most "Liberal" and "Secular" countries in the Western-World, basically four years ago, about their preferences in regards to dating. In spite of "Feminists" erroneously alleging that specific gender expectations and norms are solely enforced by men themselves or are even the result of "Conservative" attitudes in general, oftentimes the opposite is actually the case. Heck, even self-proclaimed hypocritical "Progressive Femini… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 07:07 PM |
| 2 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Because I do not want my points to be misconstrued by others in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 07:03 PM |
| 17 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?I am definitely not the one that confuses the concepts of "Masculinity" with "Toxic Masculinity" mate. "Feminists" on the other hand assume that "Masculinity" is the construct of the so called "Capitalist, White Supremacist, Cis-Hetero Patriarchy" or whatever it is these days, while they simultaneously absolve women of all responsibility in enforcing a specific set of gender expectations and norms in society. It is as if the almost hold women to such impossible standards of literal perfection, t… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 08:29 AM |
| 7 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Well, we are certainly in agreement here. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 08:25 AM |
| 14 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Notice that "Feminists" are constantly attempting to put the ball in men's court? Even in cases of blatant bias and "Sexism" on behalf of women, it is still men that shoulder the blame. It is as if they have no desire in the slightest to hold women accountable for their actions at all. Unreal. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 06:43 AM |
| 15 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?But the problem is that "Feminists" refer to all "Masculinity" as toxic so... | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 06:30 AM |
| 16 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Absolutely, but the problem is when men eventually decide to express their feelings they are unfortunately oftentimes judged for it, especially by women themselves. Sad but true. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 04:49 AM |
| 11 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Even in regards to homosexual relationships, there usually exists a more "Masculine" partner(e.g the "Butch")as well as a more "Feminine" one(e.g the "Femme"). | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 04:44 AM |
| 8 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?I obviously have no problem myself with women having whatever preferences they personally desire in regards to dating, but the problem is that "Feminists" place the blame solely on men for the persistence of what they refer to as "Toxic Masculinity" in our society. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 04:26 AM |
| 9 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?I obviously have no problem myself with women having whatever preferences they personally desire in regards to dating, but the problem is that "Feminists" place the blame solely on men for the persistence of what they refer to as "Toxic Masculinity" in our society. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 04:23 AM |
| 20 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?I obviously have no problem myself with women having whatever preferences they personally desire in regards to dating, but the problem is that "Feminists" place the blame solely on men for the persistence of what they refer to as "Toxic Masculinity" in our society. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 04:23 AM |
| 19 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?It appears you have my post entirely confused mate. I have no problem whatsoever with women having whatever preference they personally desire in regards to dating, I do take issue however with the fact that "Feminists" assume women have no responsibility in enforcing specific gender expectations and norms in society and unfortunately place the blame solely on men themselves. And in some cases, they even deny the fact that women generally find "Masculine" men more attractive and erroneously assum… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 04:20 AM |
| 54 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?But the problem is that "Feminists" place the blame solely on men for the persistence of what they refer to as "Toxic Masculinity" in our society. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 01:01 AM |
| 32 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?Exactly, when cases of women enforcing specific gender expectations and norms are being brought up, "Feminists" highlight the phrase "but men too". While they obviously never utilise such justifications and rationalisations when it is the other way around. It is as if the almost hold women to such impossible standards of literal perfection, the idea that women can be as biased as men are is unfathomable to them. They idealize women to such an extreme extent to the point of literal objectificatio… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 12:57 AM |
| 27 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?While I obviously agree with your overall assumption, the problem is the blame is placed solely on men, while simultaneously women are absolved of any responsibility whatsoever. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/23 12:52 AM |
| 119 | Who are the ones enforcing specific gender expectations and norms again?You should also not ignore the fact the women interviewed in the aforementioned video come from various religious/cultural/racial/ethnic/age related backgrounds themselves(e.g American, British, Eastern-European, African, Asian, Indian/Pakistani and so on), yet the overwhelming majority of them admitted they prefer more "Masculine" men. Do not get me wrong here, there is absolutely nothing wrong with women having particular preferences in regards to dating, nor they have to clarify and explain s… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/23 11:35 PM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Which is why I suggested that "Hyposexuals" only date other "Hyposexuals" so as to avoid potential confusion and conflict. Simply put, it is somewhat significantly easier for "Hyposexuals" to find compatible partners out there, because there exist plenty of individuals like that. When it comes to "Asexuals" however, they are basically limiting themselves to an extremely niche group of the populace, as even "Hyposexuals" will eventually desire some short of sexual intimacy in the relationship. | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/12/23 07:25 PM |
| 5 | Another scientific study has concluded that "Autism Spectrum Disorders" are highly interconnected with and linked to the phenomenon of "Asexuality"."Bro what is it with you and the unnecessary quotes? You don't need to put autism and asexuality in quotes like they aren't real things." I did place both of the aforementioned terms in quotes not to "deny" their existence as you erroneously assumed yourself, but to offer emphasis to the point I was attempting to convey and because the concept of asexuality is incredibly controversial in and of itself. Quotes can also be utilised so as to increase the emphatic posture of specific phrases and ter… | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/12/23 07:09 PM |
| 8 | Another scientific study has concluded that "Autism Spectrum Disorders" are highly interconnected with and linked to the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Well, I am not a "Blackpiller" myself in the slightest, I just derive enjoyment from the science of attraction in general and this is the only surbeddit that is oriented towards the discussion of such scientific research. | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/12/23 06:50 PM |
| 1 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?Both of the above examples you offered are comprised of frustrated "Feminists", basically having to explain their desire for motherhood to other "Feminists". Which is the primary reason on why they published both of the these articles in the first place. To "clarify" and even "explain" their choices to other "Feminists", because the movement in general is incredibly judgemental towards them as a result of said lifestyle choices. And in case you have any further doubts, just look at how "Feminist… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/23 05:13 AM |
| 2 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?When a particular movement happens to be mostly comprised by "Extremists", it signifies such a movement is either doing a terrible job to weed out such individuals or that a significant portion of said movement passively agrees with such viewpoints. I definitely believe that is the case with both the "Feminist" and the "MRA" movement. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/23 05:01 AM |
| 12 | Never forget that in spite of the irrational diatribes of "Feminist Fundamentalists", women absolutely contribute to the enforcement of gender expectations and norms. Simply put, men behave in a "Masculine" manner because women find it attractive."Sexual selection? That’s a weird path to go down. When you get into it, it gets so complex, and hard to ‘pin’ the propagation of genes on either sex, because of things like intersexual competition and imprinted genes." While "Intrasexual Competition" is definitely a real concept, female choice has actually played a significantly more important role in the propagation of specific characteristics and behaviours. Which is the primary reason on why there exists twice the amount of female ancestors … | /r/MensRights | 02/12/23 03:59 AM |
| 3 | Another scientific study has concluded that "Autism Spectrum Disorders" are highly interconnected with and linked to the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Well, I will definitely accept this as a compliment. | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/12/23 03:13 AM |
| 14 | Never forget that in spite of the irrational diatribes of "Feminist Fundamentalists", women absolutely contribute to the enforcement of gender expectations and norms. Simply put, men behave in a "Masculine" manner because women find it attractive.I do not necessarily believe that to be the case. Since women wield significantly more power than men in the dating process, they happen to be the ones that select men with specific characteristics, therefore propagating such traits in the next generation. Simply put, men behave in a certain fashion because women react positively to such behaviours. Men place far more importance on how they are perceived by women than how they are perceived by other men: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/23 01:50 AM |
| 25 | Never forget that in spite of the irrational diatribes of "Feminist Fundamentalists", women absolutely contribute to the enforcement of gender expectations and norms. Simply put, men behave in a "Masculine" manner because women find it attractive.I can certainly attest this has been the case in my personal life as well. I have never once heard the phrase "man up", "men do not cry" or that men are supposed to "chase women" because they are "hunters" from another man, solely from women themselves. Similarly to the ones purporting that men are not supposed to wear pink and earrings. In spite of "Feminazis" claiming that women are supposedly more "accepting" of such expressions(because of so the so called "Patriarchy" and "Masculine Insecuri… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/23 01:19 AM |
| 3 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".The real issue here is that nobody is denying the "RedPill" is complete and utter bollocks. The problem is that he overtestimates the amount of men that are buying into the whole "Manosphere" nonsense, but underestimates the amount of women that are buying into the whole "Dark Feminine Energy" nonsense(1 BILLION views on TikTok alone and counting, which basically amounts to about 15% of the global population). Content that basically teaches to women that intelligence and achievement are unimport… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/23 12:10 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".Indeed, red-flags all the way through. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/23 11:57 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".He literally highlighted the fact the men have their own set of problems cannot be perceived as evidence that we do not live in a "Patriarchy" or that somehow "Male Privilege" does not exist. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/23 11:57 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".I guess you are absolutely correct in this respect. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/23 11:55 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Again, it appears you might be confused about the difference between "Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder" and "Hyposexuality". The difference between the aforementioned conditions is the former is a pathological condition(hence the term "disorder")which is usually the result of other recurring issues, whereas the latter is just a normal variation in sexuality. "Hypsoexuals" do experience lower sexual desire and interest in sexual activity, but not necessarily the absence of it. Hyposexuals" could… | /r/BlackPillScience | 01/12/23 03:50 AM |
| 1 | "Schizoid Personality Disorder", highly interconnected with and linked to the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Additional evidence that "Asexuality" is oftentimes the result of various underlying causes and not a "fixed" and "innate" sexual orientation(although I am still suspecting that an abysmally small portion of individuals globally are actual "Asexuals" from birth). | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/23 08:20 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".While I am definitely in agreement with everything that you stated yourself, I also have to highlight that you are perhaps overestimating the amount of sex most couples actually have. According to a massive and recent scientific study, the overwhelming majority of couples have sex about once a week: https://www.nbcnews.com/better/health/how-often-do-happiest-couples-have-sex-it-s-less-ncna828491 There exist way more individuals with average libidos and even "Hyposexuals" out there than it is com… | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/23 07:59 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Noted, as you stated yourself already you experience an absence of sexual attraction "almost all the time", which is obviously different from "all the time". | /r/BlackPillScience | 30/11/23 07:40 PM |
| 2 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege"."Male Feminists" are universally despised(and for a good reason of course, since a great proportion of them eventually reveal themselves to be abusive one way or another). Heck even female "Feminists" loathe them: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/19/why-i-wont-date-another-male-feminist https://babe.net/2016/08/31/ill-never-date-another-male-feminist-4557 | /r/MensRights | 30/11/23 05:06 PM |
| 3 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".Until he reveals himself to be an abuser at some point(they all eventually turn out like this one way or another). | /r/MensRights | 30/11/23 05:03 PM |
| 6 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".Accurate. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/23 04:58 PM |
| 4 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".Absolutely, self-loathing behaviour to the point of abuse is all they have to offer. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/23 04:54 PM |
| 4 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".Personally, I cannot observe any difference between "Islamic Fundamentalists" and many "Feminists" in the Western-World at the moment. Such retrograde and outright reactionary views they both hold dear and refuse to abandon. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/23 04:49 PM |
| 13 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".Look at the following, a viral video that surpassed 7 MILLION views, where women basically yearn for special treatment because of their gender: https://youtube.com/shorts/FvEdZvMGayk?si=S3BKGMchoYV2pJPS Imagine if a man created an equivalent video gloating that men should receive special treatment because of their gender... | /r/MensRights | 30/11/23 06:07 AM |
| 12 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".What is even more laughable is that he alleged that "Misogyny" is supposedly widespread in our society, yet apparently his own channel has close to 2 million subscribers. "Feminists" adore nothing more than fabricating instances of "Sexism" to push the pseudoscientific narrative of the "Patriarchy". | /r/MensRights | 30/11/23 05:49 AM |
| 12 | "Male Feminist" hypocrite utilises irrational and fabricated justifications in order to prove the existence of the so called "Patriarchy" and "Male Privilege".Firstly, he alleges there exists a non-existent "epidemic" and "explosion" of men buying into the whole "RedPill" and "Manosphere" movements(without any credible evidence of course)by offering anecdotal evidence that his team somehow consulted "tons" of concerned women out there about such subjects, yet for some reason he conveniently glosses over the fact there exists even more popular toxic content out there created primarily by female content creators such as the following: https://youtu.be/S… | /r/MensRights | 30/11/23 05:26 AM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality"."I’m sorry. That was bitchy. I didn’t mean it that way though. Was just my initial reaction, but I can also be excited by science and ramble on." Apology accepted. "What do you think are the real world implications of hyposexual vs asexual though?" Personally, I am under the impression the implications of "Hyposexuality" are that such individuals first and foremost have a significant probability of finding a compatible partner, whereas "Asexuals" are extremely restricting and limiting themselves… | /r/BlackPillScience | 29/11/23 06:56 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Being "Asexual" is primarily correlated with an absence of sexual attraction first and foremost, however if you are capable of experiencing sexual attraction you are obviously not one yourself. | /r/BlackPillScience | 29/11/23 06:35 PM |
| 3 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Did you even read the scientific study at all mate? The scientific study above concluded that women do indeed find various personality attributes/characteristics associated with "Dominance" to be significantly more attractive and not necessarily "Dominance" in and of itself per se(as highlighted by the title of my post). This is also evidenced by the fact that describing men as "Non Dominant" also decreased their desirability exponentially, because obviously such descriptions are associated with… | /r/BlackPillScience | 29/11/23 05:55 PM |
| 1 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Did you even read the scientific study at all? The scientific above concluded that women do indeed find various personality attributes/characteristics associated with "Dominance" to be significantly more attractive and not necessarily "Dominance" in and of itself per se. This is also evidenced by the fact that describing men as "Non Dominant" also decreased their desirability, because obviously such descriptions are associated with a lack of "Masculinity". Furthermore, almost no woman found pers… | /r/BlackPillScience | 29/11/23 04:49 PM |
| 2 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Did you even read the scientific study at all? The scientific study above concluded that women do indeed find various personality attributes/characteristics associated with "Dominance" to be significantly more attractive and not necessarily "Dominance" in and of itself per se(as highlighted by the title of my post). This is also evidenced by the fact that describing men as "Non Dominant" also decreased their desirability, because obviously such descriptions are associated with an overall lack of… | /r/BlackPillScience | 29/11/23 04:46 PM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Not to appear impolite, but why refer yourself as an "Asexual" if you do not actually happen to be one then? | /r/BlackPillScience | 29/11/23 04:55 AM |
| 12 | Another scientific study has concluded that "Autism Spectrum Disorders" are highly interconnected with and linked to the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Although the above scientific study only included women, since the "Asexual" community is disproportionately comprised of women themselves the findings are even more relevant in this context. | /r/BlackPillScience | 29/11/23 03:49 AM |
| 1 | As it turns out, clothing does indeed "make" the man: According to a poll commissioned by a premium clothing retailer, women found men in suits significantly more attractive when compared to casual attire.Another poll conducted over a decade ago also indicated that not only women found men in suits significantly more attractive, but a whopping 80% of women admitted they were willing to sacrifice going to dinner, their cell phones or even having sex for an entire year if it meant they would have received a smartly dressed partner in return: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/study-reveals-clothes-do-make-the-man-sexier-smarter-and-more-successful-112858669.html | /r/BlackPillScience | 29/11/23 02:29 AM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Personally, I have only been diagnosed with a very mild form of "Generalised Anxiety Disorder"(which is incredibly manageable), but here you go nonetheless: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypoactive_sexual_desire_disorder https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10803-020-04565-6 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11324580_Sexual_motivation_and_duration_of_partnership http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/05/23/nytimes_on_lybrido_women_get_bored_with_monogamy_faster_than_men.html P.… | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/11/23 09:48 PM |
| 2 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".The exception does not justify the rule, as the old saying goes. The scientific study above does not at all imply that every single individual out there diagnosed with "Autism Spectrum Disorders" is an "Asexual", rather than a vast proportion of self-proclaimed "Asexuals" have been diagnosed with "Autism Spectrum Disorders" of some short. Many self-proclaimed "Asexuals" have other underlying issues that have triggered their "Asexuality" and is probably not an innate sexual orientation for them. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/11/23 09:25 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Accurate. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/11/23 09:21 PM |
| 3 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Therefore you are not an "Asexual", as long as you are capable of experiencing sexual attraction of course. | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/11/23 09:19 PM |
| 3 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".I see, perhaps a Urologist/Andrologist could discuss any potential solutions to your current problems. Keep in mind that a reduction in penile sensitivity could also be the result of aggressive masturbation techniques as well. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 11:01 PM |
| 4 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality"."But what do you base this idea on? Like, why did you end up thinking this specific issue doesn’t exist among all others?" I am basing my hypothesis on various scientific studies(such as the one I linked above), including visiting many forums related to "Asexuality". And finally, I have never once claimed that "Asexuality" does not exist, what I stated is the number of actual "Asexuals" is probably lower than many individuals actually believe. "And if you are so “hyposexual” you never want sex, … | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 10:48 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".Any Pornography addiction whatsoever? | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 10:29 PM |
| 4 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".You are not alone in this one mate. In fact, according to a multitude of scientific studies, individuals across various countries, cultures and generations have actually been having less sex in spite of what some might believe: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-have-been-having-less-sex-whether-theyre-teenagers-or-40-somethings/ | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 10:26 PM |
| 1 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".There always exists the option of visiting a Psychologist to have everything shorted out in case you are wondering. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 10:20 PM |
| 6 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".There has been some scientific evidence that genital sensitivity in general is the result of genetic imprinting, therefore a feature that is outside of one's control. Have you perhaps explored on whether underlying psychological issues have spearheaded your reduction in penile sensitivity? | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 10:04 PM |
| 3 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".It definitely "exists", but plenty of self-proclaimed "Asexuals" usually have other underlying issues that result in their absence of sexual attraction and desire for sexual activity. Personally, I would classify many "Asexuals" as "Hyposexuals" if anything. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 10:02 PM |
| 7 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".I definitely appreciate the compliment 😂 | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 10:00 PM |
| 39 | "Autism Spectrum Disorders", highly interconnected and linked with the phenomenon of "Asexuality".I have a theory that "Asexuality"(which is purported to be prevalent in about 1% of the population), is much less common than many individuals actually believe. In fact, if one cruises through various forums related to "Asexuality", they will stumble upon many cases of Depression, Anxiety Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Borderline Personality Disorder, Schizoid Personality Disorder, Former Psychological Trauma, Childhood Sexual Abuse/Sexual Violence as well as Substance Abuse issues(which … | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/11/23 03:24 PM |
| 1 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?"No woman should have the right to stay at home to raise her kids. Women should not have that choice, because if there is such a choice, too many women would choose that." -Simone de Beauvoir-1976(An infamous Feminist)" Absolutely, so many options... P.S. Why do you get "concerned" for women in such situations? Why is it any of your freaking business how consenting adults decide to live? Do you, perhaps, happen to be their parent or something, or is it because deep down inside you distrust women… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 10:43 PM |
| 1 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?The above quote signifies the utter hypocrisy of the "Feminist" movement in it's entity. Excellent find. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 10:41 PM |
| 2 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?You definitely should lol. Personally, I do not identify as an "MRA" either. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 10:38 PM |
| 1 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?If this does not offer conclusive evidence that "Feminism" is nothing more than a complete and utter joke, I do not know what is anymore. Excellent counterargument by the way. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 10:29 PM |
| 1 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?Counterpoint. Take a peek to how "Feminists" reacted to the likes or Kaley Cuoco or Michelle Obama, when the latter two admitted they decided to prioritize family. Or more accurately, take a peek at the following article as well: https://thefederalist.com/2019/01/31/feminists-insist-women-arent-success-focus-family/ P.S. You do not even want me to delve into the notorious book from Betty Friedan called "The Feminine Mystique", which was basically a massive diatribe against motherhood. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 10:25 PM |
| 2 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?Counterpoint. Take a peek to how "Feminists" reacted to the likes or Kaley Cuoco or Michelle Obama, when the latter two admitted they decided to prioritize family. Or more accurately, take a peek at the following article as well: https://thefederalist.com/2019/01/31/feminists-insist-women-arent-success-focus-family/ | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 09:51 PM |
| 1 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?Not even this lol. I am half British and I can definitely assure you there exists a huge "Feminist" campaign there to prohibit Pronography altogether. Similarly to the ones against "Page 3 Girls" as well as "F1 Grid Girls" a few years back. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 09:50 PM |
| 1 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?Counterpoint. Take a peek to how "Feminists" reacted to the likes or Kaley Cuoco or Michelle Obama, when the latter two admitted they decided to prioritize family. Or more accurately, take a peek at the following article as well: https://thefederalist.com/2019/01/31/feminists-insist-women-arent-success-focus-family/ | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 09:48 PM |
| 2 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".Or more accurately, a Religious Fundamentalist in disguise. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 09:40 PM |
| 1 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".I can definitely see where you are coming from, but even in the United States, just 13 States have prohibited abortion altogether. Furthermore, it is still permitted to travel to other States where it is legally available. I was more referring to the common "Feminist" dogma that woman are somehow "pressured" by society to choose motherhood, which is obviously incredibly "Paternalistic" towards women as a whole. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 09:38 PM |
| 2 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".The "Nobel Peace Prize" has been a joke since it was awarded to Henry Kissinger back in the 1970's. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/23 09:34 PM |
| 4 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Do you lack important reading comphrension skills or are you just trolling? We all make snap judgments on others personalities based on just a few seconds of meeting them. This is not strictly about appearance, but personality as well. | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/11/23 02:19 AM |
| 2 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.I see, appreciate your response. Take care mate! | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/11/23 02:16 AM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Just because most display some degree of "Psychopathic" tendencies, it does not necessarily mean they happen to be "Psychopaths". The supposed overrepresentation of "Psychopaths" in position of power has also been discredited as well: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/to-manage-is-human/202305/the-truth-about-corporate-psychopaths | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/11/23 02:13 AM |
| -1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.I cannot really tell if you are being sarcastic and whatnot. | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/11/23 02:09 AM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.If you are referring to overly "passive" and "submissive" behaviour then I obviously agree with you. Personally, I was simply referring to the power balance within most romantic relationships. Heck, even in the LGBT community, many relationships are characterised by various power imbalances as well. | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/11/23 01:59 AM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Science has already offered conclusive evidence that we absolutely make snap judgments about someone's personality based on just a few seconds of meeting them. There is also the infamous "Halo Effect" on top of it. | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/11/23 01:57 AM |
| 2 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".Because he wanted to stave off potential accusations of hypocrisy. The "Nobel Committee" was criticised by many after it decided to award Barack Obama of that prize, so the only thing they did not want was to stir up further controversy. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/23 05:04 AM |
| 1 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".Exactly, the so called "Gender Wage Gap" has been debunked multiple times already. I cannot even comprehend the reason on why some continue to bring it up. It is as if they refuse to accept the reality. Unreal. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/23 05:01 AM |
| 2 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".But that is exactly what I stated as well. The so called "Gender Wage Gap" should be more accurately referred to as an "Earnings Gap", being largely the result of personal choices instead of discrimination. Notice that Claudia Goldin did not even suggest common "Feminist" solutions to revert it such as useless "gender quotas" as well as "implicit bias testing"? The only solution in regards to fixing it, is to simply make the workplace more family friendly accordingly and obviously not to counter… | /r/MensRights | 25/11/23 04:54 AM |
| 1 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".The "Nobel Peace Prize" had been completely discredited after it was awarded to Henry Kissinger back in the 1970's. Heck, even Donald Trump was proposed for the "Nobel Peace Prize" at some point. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/23 04:48 AM |
| 3 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".The United States Department Of Labour conducted a massive study back in 2019, basically debunking the fallacious sophistry of the so called "Gender Wage Gap": https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/public-policy/hr-public-policy-issues/Documents/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf Since it is the Federal Government we are talking about, you cannot get more accurate than that. | /r/MensRights | 25/11/23 04:46 AM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.My ex girlfriend had a friend that used to date such an individual. As expected, she came from an abusive childhood and also dealt with substance abuse issues herself. Horrible women go for horrible men, as the old saying goes. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/11/23 04:13 AM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not."Narcissists" are fundamentally different than "Machiavellians" and "Psychopaths". Therefore "Bad Boy" theory has been thoroughly discredited. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/11/23 03:53 AM |
| 3 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Are you even talking to me mate? I have always been successful with the ladies, currently in a relationship with one as well. I am just attempting to debunk the common myth perpetuated by popular culture that women are somehow attracted to "Bad Boys". Quite the contrary actually, women are attracted to men that display various "Positive Masculine" attributes and characteristics. I am living proof that one does not need to behave like a so called "Bad Boy" to attract and attain women in case you … | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/11/23 03:49 AM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.I have seen two that unfortunately do. Although definitely not the majority nevertheless. | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/11/23 03:43 AM |
| 0 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.People "theorise" they want an equal relationship, although the vast majority of relationships are obviously not truly equal. Most are also supposedly concerned about poverty and climate change, yet they continue voting for warmongering politicians and support exploitative multinational corporations that exacerbate both of the aforementioned problems. What people say and what they actually do are two entirely different concepts in and of themselves. People are massive and duplicitous liars, unfo… | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/11/23 03:34 AM |
| 4 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Not just physical attraction, but also snap judgement in regards to someone else's personality as well. Besides, it has been scientifically proven that individuals possessing various "Dark Triad" characteristics tend to "look" a certain way. Obviously our subconscious is able to pick up on such cues pretty accurately as well(as reflected in common phrases such as "go with your gut" and so on). | /r/BlackPillScience | 25/11/23 03:32 AM |
| 2 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Could you, perhaps, elaborate further on what you mean? | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/11/23 10:06 PM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.I did, but I guess that you are perhaps correct, I should have clarified this further in my title. My apologies. | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/11/23 10:05 PM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Confidence, assertiveness, decisiveness, gregariousness, alluring/flirty demeanour, being mysterious, protectiveness, independence, being charismatic, being handy, competence, integrity, discipline, dedication, devotion, strength, honour, self-control, self-care about appearance as well as mental health, ambition, intelligence, courage, fearlessness, a hard-working spirit, faithfulness, trustworthiness, tenderness, romance, vulnerability, being considerate of the needs/feelings of others, being … | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/11/23 09:47 PM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Many on this surbeddit lol. | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/11/23 09:42 PM |
| 2 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Most are in prison for violent offences according to the Bureau Of Justice Statistics and not just "drug related shit". | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/11/23 09:37 PM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.According to the article that you linked, just 4.5% of the entire population can actually be classified as "Psychopaths". By further utilising regressive PCL analysis, the actual number drops to around 1.2%: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661044/full Moreover, while "Psychopaths" are indeed more likely to emerge as leaders, their leadership still is oftentimes ineffective and they eventually end up being disliked by their peers: https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2018-51219-001… | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/11/23 09:36 PM |
| 3 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Of course they do, since individuals make snap judgments on whether they have a desire to date someone in just the first 3 seconds of meeting them. Therefore the above scientific study simply attempts to delve into the various implicit biases individuals are accompanied by. Simply put, the above scientific study was constructed in such a manner so as to ascertain the level of "carnal" attraction individuals feel towards the "Dark Triad" personality. | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/11/23 09:13 PM |
| 3 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Anecdotal evidence does not constitute actual evidence. I never treated women poorly, yet I have always been successful with the ladies. See how it goes? I can also offer my own personal accounts as well. P.S. What you usually refer to as "Bad Boys" in the media, are simply more "Masculine" men without being abusive of course. Examples include Edward Cullen as well as Stefan and Damon Salvatore. None of the above characters treat women poorly, in fact they are actually immensely romantic. Yet th… | /r/BlackPillScience | 24/11/23 09:11 PM |
| 1 | A Nobel prize for proving the gender wage gap does not exist through discrimination.Yet she did not support any of the oftentimes declared "Feminist" solutions such as "gender quotas" as well as "implicit bias testing". | /r/MensRights | 24/11/23 10:56 AM |
| 1 | A Nobel prize for proving the gender wage gap does not exist through discrimination.So you are basically denying women's agency and autonomy by erroneously assuming their personal choices are the result of societal indoctrination yet you are calling yourself a "Feminist" in the process? | /r/MensRights | 24/11/23 10:39 AM |
| 1 | A Nobel prize for proving the gender wage gap does not exist through discrimination.Are you literally that dense? What Claudia Goldin proved is the so called "Gender Wage Gap" is more accurately an "Earnings Gap". In that is mostly the result of PERSONAL CHOICES women make, back then educational ones whereas now related to childbearing. She absolutely found no credible evidence whatsoever the so called "Gender Wage Gap" is the result of "wage discrimination" as many "Feminists" such as yourself erroneously assume. Why is this such a hard concept to grasp? | /r/MensRights | 24/11/23 10:29 AM |
| 1 | A Nobel prize for proving the gender wage gap does not exist through discrimination.The article OP linked basically stated the so called "Gender Wage Gap" is mostly the result of women deciding to have children in addition to the associated implications of such a choice. It did not state at all that women are somehow "forced" to enter either Nursing or Education and that men are forced to enter in STEM. The above was simply your own personal observation. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/23 10:20 AM |
| 31 | "Feminist Fundamentalist" Rebecca Watson continues to peddle the debunked conspiracy theory about the so called "Gender Wage Gap".Acclaimed "Feminist Economist" and expert on women in the workplace Claudia Goldin, was actually awarded the "Nobel Prize In Economics" for offering conclusive proof the so called "Gender Wage Gap" is actually the result of PERSONAL CHOICES and NOT DISCRIMINATION: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-67045408 Rebecca Watson did not like this, therefore she had to create a YouTube video to fabricate a conspiracy theory. Against a "Nobel Prize" winning Economist mind you. Their retardation knows no b… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/23 09:35 AM |
| 1 | Lisa Britton nails the gender wage gap mythAbsolutely "Feminazi Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy theories. First things first, since you appear that you did not even touch the massive report by the United States Department Of Labour, it calculated the so called "Gender Wage Gap" not based on "median incomes", but on the hourly rates that both men and women actually receive. And they obviously found no credible evidence of discrimination. "Although additional research in this area is clearly needed, this study leads to the unambiguou… | /r/MensRights | 24/11/23 09:01 AM |
| 1 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Absolutely, we are both in agreement in this respect. | /r/BlackPillScience | 23/11/23 08:02 PM |
| 4 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Usually both. | /r/BlackPillScience | 23/11/23 08:00 PM |
| 13 | The myth of so called "Bad Boys" has eventually been debunked. Men that embody "Narcissism" and similarly associated attributes are perceived as more attractive by women, whereas "Machiavellianism" and "Psychopathy" are not.Women are definitely attracted to more "Masculine" men, but they simultaneously expect such men to be competent, reliable, dependable, romantic, tender, caring and committed. What many self-proclaimed "Incels" and "Nice Guys" cannot understand is they happen to be unsuccessful with women not because they are kind, but because they are(to put it bluntly)not "Masculine" enough. Besides, just 1% of the entire population can be classified as "Psychopaths", as it would not make Evolutionary sense for… | /r/BlackPillScience | 23/11/23 04:35 PM |
| 11 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?It is as if they almost despise women(secretly and deep down inside at least). | /r/MensRights | 20/11/23 01:13 AM |
| 9 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?What about the fact that a significant portion of the "Feminist" movement is comprised of extremists though? | /r/MensRights | 20/11/23 12:53 AM |
| 3 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?"Feminists", absolutely want their cake and to eat it too! Absolutely ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/23 09:42 PM |
| 6 | Why do "Feminist Fundamentalists" claim they are in favour of "women having the freedom to make their own decisions", yet they simultaneously shame and judge stay at home mothers?They are definitely against women making the personal decision to be stay at home mothers though. With the most notorious example being Betty Friedan herself, including her diatribe(e.g "The Feminine Mystique")against women's personal lifestyle choices. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/23 09:39 PM |
| 3 | Within heterosexual relationships across the world, 2.8% of men reported being victims of forced sex, compared to 2.3% of women. That disparity further increased in societies in which women held greater status.Absolute "Feminist Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy theories. Perhaps, according to "Feminazi" sources, but not to actual sources that utilise the scientific method: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/11/the-understudied-female-sexual-predator/503492/ And just because you disagree with the results of a particular scientific study, it does not necessarily make it "misleading". What are you, a prepubescent high-schooler that cannot even entertain their dogma being challenged? St… | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/11/23 05:14 AM |
| 2 | Within heterosexual relationships across the world, 2.8% of men reported being victims of forced sex, compared to 2.3% of women. That disparity further increased in societies in which women held greater status.What a load of "Feminist Fundamentalist" delusional conspiracy theories. Are you literally trying to excuse female sex offenders here, you freaking imbecile? Per the scientific study: "Feminist theory states that sexual coercion is the result of male dominance over women and the need to maintain that dominance; however, studies showing that women sexually coerce men point towards weaknesses in that theory. Some researchers have, therefore, suggested that it is the extent to which people view the… | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/11/23 05:04 AM |
| 1 | A husband's depression negatively affected his wife's sexual satisfaction. A wife's depression did not affect her husband's sexual satisfaction.There exists absolutely no credible evidence for what you are asserting in here. In fact, upwards of 57% of divorces are the result of financial and monetary disagreements and obviously not "Gender Inequality" as you are erroneously assuming yourself. And what the scientific study you shared also highlighted is that women lose sexual desire for men they perceive as "dependent" on them, perhaps because consider them to be less "Masculine". There also exist scientific studies showcasing that "Egal… | /r/BlackPillScience | 14/11/23 04:16 AM |
| 1 | As it turns out, both men and women are equally superficial: According to a new scientific study, men with attractive wives, reported higher marital satisfaction whereas women with high-status husbands were also more content when compared to others.See, thank you for your response! | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 03:37 PM |
| 1 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Definitely and that is because(at the core level)women have an inherent desire for safety and security. As explained by a female Therapist in the following article: https://www.pathwaystopeacecounseling.com/post/the-safety-zone-understanding-a-woman-s-need-for-safety | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 02:49 PM |
| 1 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Here is another(and more recent)scientific study, reaching a similar conclusion(they also included older men and women as well): https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/feelings/dominant-men-attract-more-women-study-2812374/ You should also take into account that University/College/Younger women also tend to be significantly more "Liberal", therefore it should be assumed that such attributes would be considered attractive by women of previous generations as well. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 02:45 PM |
| 3 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Definitely and that is because(at the core level)women have an inherent desire for safety and security. As explained by a female Therapist in the following article: https://www.pathwaystopeacecounseling.com/post/the-safety-zone-understanding-a-woman-s-need-for-safety | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 02:42 PM |
| 3 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.My own mother: "Never be weak in front of a woman, if you ever desire to find and keep one". My own sister: "If you ever desire to find a girlfriend/wife, approach as many women as possible, you only need a single "yes". LOL | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 02:39 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.You are definitely incorrect here, apparently you did not read the commentary written over at PsychologyToday, which I also shared in the comments section multiple times, but here you go nonetheless: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 02:20 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Of course I did, but apparently you did not even read the commentary written over at PsychologyToday, which I also shared in the comments section multiple times, but here you go nonetheless: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 02:19 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.First things first, I am not into any "pill bullshit". Just because I enjoy exploring and sharing such scientific studies, it does not necessarily mean I subscribe to the "BlackPill" ideology, no more than someone being interested in investigating religious matters has to be religious. Secondly, nobody ever "took apart" any of my arguments and no one has offered any claims to the contrary, other than spurious speculations. One of you imbeciles reported my post, therefore I had to delete it becau… | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 02:01 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Women despise your ilk mate, judging by the fact that you lads are all pathetic little "Incels": https://amp.dailycaller.com/2017/06/20/study-republicans-are-having-more-sex-than-democrats/ https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/magazine/does-a-more-equal-marriage-mean-less-sex.html Which is also true in Europe as well: https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamesball/green-in-the-streets-ukip-in-the-sheets?utm_term=.exda63oaV#.xpepVg2pP Stay angry and sexless lol. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 01:45 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Here, take the two following sources if the one above does not fulfill your "expectations": https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12211523/Conservative-women-attractive-liberals-study-says.html https://nypost.com/2023/06/20/ai-finds-conservative-women-more-attractive-happier-in-photos/ Obvious troll is obvious. | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 01:43 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.But the "Incels" here are only you lads lol. One of you imbeciles reported my post, therefore I had to delete it because I do not want my account to be banned. Are you literally that pathetic? P.S. And to respond to the random Reddit thread(which is not at all scientific)that you shared, DeadBedrooms are actually overrepresented amongst "Progressives" and "Male Feminists" themselves: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/09/magazine/does-a-more-equal-marriage-mean-less-sex.html In addition to sex-offe… | /r/BlackPillScience | 13/11/23 11:37 AM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.I unfortunately had to delete my thread because some imbecile reported it and I obviously do not my account to be banned. As it turns out, I triggered some morons that could not respond to my argument in a civil manner. If you have to censor your opponent to get your point across, you have basically lost the debate. | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 01:15 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.If(according to you), I do not actually get laid, then how come my thread was reported by one of you morons, because I triggered you troglodytes? Which directly proves my point, you cannot handle the truth, therefore you have to censor it. Let me enjoy having sex with my girlfriend and as for yourself, you can stay single and sexless. Fantasising what it actually feels like, while trying to act "tough" over the internet. LOL | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 09:43 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Read the scientific study quoted in the article mate, do not shoot the messenger. Since one of you morons reported my thread and I obviously do not want my account to be banned, I will assume that you have to censor me because you cannot refute my arguments. Innit? | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 09:35 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Read the scientific study quoted in the article mate, do not shoot the messenger. Since one of you morons reported my thread and I obviously do not want my account to be banned, I will assume that you have to censor me because you cannot refute my arguments. Innit? | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 09:34 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.My thread was reported by a thin-skinned moron. Since I am not a fan of censorship, I am definitely not a "Feminist". | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 09:31 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Appreciate all your baseless efforts there boyo, you literally offered me lots of laughs. Now, where do I start to debunk all the nonsense that you spewed? First things first, since you did not even read the scientific study I shared, I am going to explain it to you in layman terms. Women were found to be attracted to more "Masculine" men, irrespective of their own political orientation, because they perceived such men as more willing to invest in a relationship, in direct contrast to less "Masc… | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 09:23 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.In your own wildest dreams maybe lol. | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 05:07 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Really? Not even in your wildest dreams mate. First things first, the inaccurate poll that you shared was conducted by a "Progressive" polling company, casting obvious doubt on it's validity. It would have been the equivalent of me sharing polls conducted by the Heritage Foundation. In both the 2016 and the 2020 presidential elections respectively, the overwhelming majority of White women(the largest racial demographic in the United States that is), voted for Donald Trump: https://19thnews.org/2… | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 04:33 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Your post history is also pretty pathetic as well. Also, utilising someone's post history as a "gotcha" is incredibly lame and screams an inability to form arguments. | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 02:53 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones."Feminism" has absolutely nothing to do with "Gender Equality", and no one has actually said anything about changing your personality, but nice strawman there. | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 02:50 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.I utilised the word "Woke" because the scientific study was taken as an excerpt from the following article: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 02:44 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.I utilised the word "Woke", because the scientific study was taken as an excerpt from the following article: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men And of course, it is absolutely possible to be a "Feminist" and "Maculine" at the same time, but the whole irony of the entire situation is that many "Feminists" are constantly denigrating "Masculinity", in spite the fact they are secretly attracted to such attributes. They are … | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 02:44 AM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.I have a girlfriend currently you freaking imbecile, definitely not an "Incel", but excellent projection there mate. I just find such scientific studies fascinating enough to share them, this being basically the only subreddit out there oriented towards such subjects. Take a peek at the following thread, perhaps you should ask those actual "Incels" a couple of questions in case you have any doubts? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/569eho/why_feminist_dating_advice_sucks/ P.S. You jumped… | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 02:35 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.I have actually traveled and encountered more individuals that you could ever imagine, therefore my perspective is not completely the result of "internet fuzz" as you erroneously assume. And it has been scientifically proven already that "Feminists" are indeed less attractive in comparison to women that do not identify as such: https://www.dailywire.com/news/conservative-women-are-prettier-than-liberals-according-to-ai Women that do not identify as "Feminists" are also significantly happier: htt… | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 02:27 AM |
| 4 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.First things first, just because you happen to disagree with the results of specific scientific studies, it does not necessarily mean they happen to be "flawed" themselves. The scientific study I shared above was conducted back in 2018, across multiple societies/cultures, so as to avoid any allegations that such mating preferences only manifest in some particular societies/cultures. Another scientific study that was conducted back in 2019 with a sample size of upwards of 4.483 women in 34 countr… | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 02:17 AM |
| 3 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.But aren't "Feminists" of the opinion that both "Masculinity" and "Femininity" are social constructs of the so called "Patriarchy" anyway? | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 01:24 AM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Is this a rhetorical question or an attempt at sarcasm? | /r/BlackPillScience | 12/11/23 12:03 AM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.My own mother: "Never be weak in front of a woman, if you ever desire to find and keep one". "High quality women mostly focus on security and safety, by getting your career in check first, then you would have your pick amongst the lot". My own sister: "You should approach as many women as possible if you desire to find a girlfriend/wife, you only need a single "yes". "Stay away from overly provocative, promiscuous and insecure women if you ever desire to keep your sanity". LOL | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 11:54 PM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.The fact that many self-proclaimed "Male Feminists" are so creepy and disingenuous also does not help them in the slightest. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 10:01 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Well, "Feminists" are not some of the most sexy individuals out there, regardless of gender that is. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 10:00 PM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.It will absolutely fail as a "qualifier" as well mate: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/19/why-i-wont-date-another-male-feminist https://babe.net/2016/08/31/ill-never-date-another-male-feminist-4557 Wake up. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 08:41 PM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Definitely, but the sad truth is they do not even realise it. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 08:36 PM |
| 1 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Or more accurately, they are more orientated to keep you around if you do not come across as a "Progressive, SJW, Male Feminist, Woke" lunatic. Two sides of the same coin there boyo. "Woke misogyny" and hypocrisy, is still misogyny and hypocrisy after all. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 07:36 PM |
| 3 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.First things first, "Feminism" has absolutely nothing to do with women's rights and "Gender Equality" in general. "Feminism" is a political philosophy with a certain set of beliefs, proposing that men wield an inordinate amount of power in society and that women are somehow constantly "oppressed" and discriminated against in every area. Therefore, men's problems have to take the back seat, as they comprise a part of the "privileged class" and moreover their issues are secondary in terms of impor… | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 05:39 PM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Women are not stupid mate, they can definitely see past all of this. The vast majority of women do not identify as "Feminists" either according to polling, so even if it is utilised as a "conversation opener" or as a "qualifier" it is still doomed to fail nevertheless. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 04:43 PM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Because "Male Feminists" are so uncomfortable and ashamed of their own sexuality, they basically try to walk on eggshells around women, to the point of putting them up on a pedestal. They hide their motivations and true intentions because they deliberately do everything in their power to avoid "creeping" women out. It is as if they believe that sexuality somehow objectifies and dehumanises women, therefore they have to stamp out this part of themselves. This is why they are so unattractive to wo… | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 04:33 PM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Indeed, it was kind of a quirky and cheeky to present the topic at hand lol. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 04:27 PM |
| 3 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Definitely, although one can still believe in "Gender Equality" without calling themselves a "Feminist" for that matter. In fact, it is even preferable I would say, as "Feminism" is nothing more than a redundant and useless political movement full of logical inconsistencies at this point. One should refer to themselves as an "Egalitarian" and a "Humanist" instead(support all humans in general, not just one group over the others). | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 04:22 PM |
| 15 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Exactly, self-proclaimed "Feminists" encourage men to abandon "Masculine" characteristics/behaviours but they are simultaneously and secretly attracted to such attributes. If anything, they happen to contribute significantly more to the preservation of current gender expectations and roles than the so called "Patriarchy" or men themselves. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 08:58 AM |
| 2 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Certainly, no doubt about all of this. Any form of discrimination is absolutely unethical and should eventually be stamped out. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 08:54 AM |
| 7 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.And the risk of being a homicide victim is much higher for men according to the United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/global-study-on-homicide.html Are we going to play into the tiresome "Oppression Olympics" again? And finally, we do not live in a "Patriarchy" anymore, even the OECD admits the United States currently ranks 1.09 out of 10 on the scale, with a score of 1 indicating total "Gender Equality". Society has changed tremendously over … | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 07:29 AM |
| 12 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.One can actually believe in and actively support "Gender Equality"(as they should be), without being a self-loathing hypocrite(those are not mutually-exclusive concepts). Without being uncomfortable and ashamed of their own sexuality. P.S. Something interesting that I have noticed myself is that plenty of self-proclaimed "Male Feminists" constantly try to walk on eggshells around women, to the point of literally putting them up on a pedestal. It is as if they believe that women are somehow compr… | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 06:13 AM |
| 3 | "Male Feminism" has actually been exposed as nothing more than a failed and unsuccessful sexual strategy. Even self-proclaimed "Feminists" are attracted to "Masculine" men, instead of "Woke" ones.Below is the relevant article from PsychologyToday, with additional commentary on top of it all: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men "Feminist" dating advice is so horrible in and of itself, that even self-proclaimed "Male Feminists" themselves admit they are completely repulsive to women, in direct contrast to more "Masculine" men: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/569eho/why_feminist_dating_advice_sucks/ All of… | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 06:01 AM |
| 2 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Because one of the basic pillars of "Feminism" is the so called "Patriarchy" somehow compels women to find "Toxic Masculinity", wealth and status attractive. It is as if men are supposedly "indoctrinating" women to behave in a certain way, because women apparently lack the capacity to make their own decisions, in addition to accepting potential tradeoffs. The fact that "Feminism" infantilises and dehumanises women to such an extent, absolving them of their own agency in the process, is why nobod… | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 04:12 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Do you literally believe that countries such as Sweden are "Patriarchal" and "Sexist"? https://www.thelocal.se/20081204/16116 Even when women become more financially independent themselves, they actually tend to prefer even more powerful and wealthy, attractive older men: https://psychcentral.com/news/2010/12/12/women-of-means-prefer-older-men#1 Are you even listening to yourself mate? You are one of the primary reasons on why nobody takes "Feminism" seriously anymore. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:57 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Perhaps, although I am definitely not an "Incel" myself. I just enjoy the science, that is all. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:53 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Perhaps, although I am definitely not an "Incel" myself. I just enjoy the science, that is all. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:50 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Perhaps, although I am definitely not an "Incel" myself. I just enjoy the science, that is all. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:50 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Anecdotal evidence does not constitute actual evidence. In fact, men do not give a toss about women's resource acquisition potential and they are definitely not "intimidated" by successful women either(this is nothing more than "Feminist" propaganda after all). Women are the ones that actively refuse to "date down", limiting their options to their socioeconomic equals: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051382100060X?via%3Dihub Women are the insecure ones in this respect. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:45 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Of course there exist many unattractive and impoverished men and women throughout the world that eventually end up reproducing. But ones chances of reproducing are significantly increased if they happen to wield wealth and status. In fact, wealthy, high-status men are not only more likely to reproduce, but also they have more children on average: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19485565.2023.2220950 You do not have to agree with how our society is currently structured(I do not eithe… | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:36 AM |
| 2 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Indeed, I acquired a degree in accounting and finance myself and I am pretty content with how my life has turned out overall. Currently dating a very high quality woman that I met two months ago, with the desire to eventually tie the knot down the road as time progresses. In the meantime, we will see how all of this turns out. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:30 AM |
| 3 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".So, you basically admit that you find successful and accomplished men more attractive? Kudos for being honest, as unfortunately, many men and women are unwilling to be. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:26 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".That was not my intention in the slightest mate. Personally, I neither happen to be a "BlackPiller" or an "Incel" myself. I am just interested in scientific inquiry, in all it's forms that is. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:25 AM |
| 2 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Something tells me you are not reading my responses in the slightest. It literally feels as if I am talking to a wall, unreal. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:12 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".They definitely do not. My point was to debunk the flawed "Feminist" premise of the so called "Patriarchy", supposedly compelling women to be attracted to wealthy, high-status men. Rather than, women have been instrumental in shaping the current gender expectations and roles through their own active contributions. As per the top comment I submitted in this thread as well. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:11 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".China is basically a highly "Conservative" society with strict adherence to gender expectations and roles. What you are describing is basically the exception rather than the rule. Have you perhaps looked into the phenomenon of "leftover women" in China? These are the women that no man desires to marry and a result they usually end up single and alone. In China, men wield the majority of societal power, therefore wealth and high-status are perceived as an attractive trait in men but obviously not… | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 03:07 AM |
| 2 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".You are absolutely making a controversial statement here. There exists no credible evidence whatsoever that Sweden is somehow a "Patriarchy". In fact, according the OECD, Sweden ranks 1.01 out of 10, with numbers closer to 1 representing total "Gender Equality". In direct contrast, the United States is not so far behind at 1.09 out of 10. You are one of the many reasons on why nobody takes "Feminism" seriously anymore. P.S. Have you perhaps looked into what "Apex Fallacy" is? Here, take a peek: … | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 02:56 AM |
| 2 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".I am not "trying" to prove anything about women. I am simply sharing this scientific study because I found it interesting enough, in that it debunks the "Feminist" narrative that gender expectations in society solely exist because it the so called "Patriarchy" or men themselves. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 01:16 AM |
| 2 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".No, this is exactly what "Feminists" actually believe. | /r/BlackPillScience | 11/11/23 01:15 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Is Sweden a "Patriarchy" as well? https://www.thelocal.se/20081204/16116 Are you even listening to yourself at all? | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/23 11:34 PM |
| 2 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Are you literally that dense? Of course the above scientific study offers proof the so called "Patriarchy" does not exist. Since a lot of "Feminists" are posited to blame either the "Patriarchy" or men themselves for somehow compelling women to place significant importance on men's resource acquisition potential, then it is absolutely rational to assume that as societies become more "Liberal" and "Egalitarian", women's mating preferences would actively shift. But that is obviously not the case w… | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/23 11:31 PM |
| 6 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".I mean, since romantic relationships are a pretty big part of human existence, the intricacies of such arrangements examined by rigorous scientific exploration, would appear to be incredibly interesting innit? | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/23 04:29 AM |
| 1 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe"."The findings are also consistent with the perspective that women’s prioritizing of status and resources reflect the economic constraints they encounter in modern society (Eagly & Wood, 1999). Of course, human societies are constructed by human beings, and it is to be expected that in many cases normative behaviors will reflect fundamental human preferences (Kenrick, Trost, & Sundie, 2004; Norenzayan, Schaller, & Heine, in press)." Well, the previous article you shared from PsychologyToday basic… | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/23 04:27 AM |
| 6 | As it turns out, both men and women are equally superficial: According to a new scientific study, men with attractive wives, reported higher marital satisfaction whereas women with high-status husbands were also more content when compared to others.I am not a "BlackPiller" or an "Incel" in the slightest, I am just sharing such scientific studies because I am interested in this subject and this is the only subreddit oriented towards it. Also, have you perhaps explored the fact that you might have dated a low quality woman yourself? No amount of attractive attributes could prevent a low quality individual from eventually abandoning you, guaranteed. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/23 03:56 AM |
| 5 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".I am definitely not a "BlackPiller" myself, I just find such scientific studies interesting enough and this is the perfect subreddit to share them after all. | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/23 03:04 AM |
| 2 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".If women's mating preferences in regards to men's resource acquisition potential were the result of "Gender Socialisation" and not due to Evolutionary influences, then such findings would not have been prevalent in highly "Liberal" and "Egalitarian" societies/cultures as well. Heck, even in Sweden, women still prefer powerful and wealthy older men as their prospective partners: https://www.thelocal.se/20081204/16116 And as women become more financially independent themselves, they actually happe… | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/11/23 12:40 AM |
| 8 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Which is another painful realisation of the "Halo Effect". If Elon Musk was not 6 foot 1, with green eyes, excellent skin and decent smile, a strong jawline and a reasonably attractive face, would he be the richest man in the world? In spite of all his wealth, he still had to spend over 20 thousand grand on hair transplantation surgery so as to look presentable. Because having a decent appearance is mandated by our highly materialistic society, not even the most successful of the lot can eventua… | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 10:52 PM |
| 5 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".I mean, the fact that Elon Musk has 11 children from 3 different women already should speak for itself. Women have to be attracted to you somehow in order to initiate and maintain a relationship with you. No amount of money could offset abysmally horrible looks. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 08:49 PM |
| -5 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".What is wrong with Elon Musk? Personally, I find him to be attractive enough, especially after his "glow up"(he is tall, currently standing at 6 foot 1 inches and also has green eyes). | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 08:34 PM |
| 9 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".Obviously that is correct, but the scientific study above posits that wealth can offset "not so great" looks when it comes to women. The man in question still has to be at least average looking for all of this to work out nonetheless. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 08:34 PM |
| 27 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".But there exist plenty of women that are willing to date the second category of men that you highlighted. Elon Musk himself already has 11 children from 3 different women. I rest my case here. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 08:27 PM |
| 48 | Women are, in fact, significantly more attracted to wealthy, high-status men regardless of their own attractiveness and age. This finding holds true either in the United States, China or even "Liberal Europe".The above scientific study deals a further blow to "Feminist" propaganda and associated delusional conspiracy theories about the so called "Patriarchy". Actually, it is not the so called "Patriarchy" or even men themselves that compel women to place significant importance to a potential partner's resource acquisition potential. But all of the above is the result of the conscious personal decisions of women themselves, even in highly "Liberal" and "Egalitarian" societies. There is your "Sexism" r… | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 07:33 PM |
| 13 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Props to you for being honest, as many individuals(regardless of gender)are unfortunately unwilling to be. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 05:28 PM |
| 6 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.My own mother: "Never be weak in front of a woman, if you ever desire to find and keep one". My own sister: "If you ever desire to find a girlfriend/wife, approach as many women as possible, you only need a single "yes". LOL | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 05:27 PM |
| 14 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.My own mother: "Never be weak in front of a woman, if you ever desire to find and keep one". My own sister: "If you ever desire to find a girlfriend/wife, approach as many women as possible, you only need a single "yes". LOL | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/11/23 05:25 PM |
| 21 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Well, the infamous "Halo Effect" does benefit anyone after all, regardless of gender. | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/11/23 11:33 PM |
| 27 | The overwhelming majority of women are actually attracted to men that display various personality traits/characteristics associated with "Dominance"(e.g "Confidence" and "Assertiveness"), according to the following scientific study.Both men and women lie about their actual preferences in regards to dating, but some are fortunately honest to admit what they truly desire. In my own experience, the women that I am acquainted with, have been more than willing to admit and even advise me to behave in a more "Masculine" manner, if I ever had a desire to start and maintain a successful relationship. | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/11/23 09:01 PM |
| 2 | Women's preference for masculine faces not linked with hormonesYou are absolutely incorrect. Testosterone is actually associated with mating success amongst men, with the highest testosterone men reporting the highest sexual and reproductive success: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347208001322?via%3Dihub And there is even more to it than that. In the most socioeconomically developed countries, women's preferences for men with more "Masculine" appearances increases, as women's financial independence allows and permits them to sele… | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/11/23 07:56 PM |
| 3 | Woman, unironically refers herself as a "Trophy Wife" and even encourages other women to follow a similar path. Just more proof that traditional gender expectations are primarily enforced by women themselves instead of what "Feminist" troglodytes might actually believe.Even this woman above mentioned one viral TikTok by a woman, complaining that "high quality" man are not inclined to marry the highly attractive women. So I definitely believe that you are on something here... | /r/MensRights | 27/10/23 11:52 AM |
| 3 | Woman, unironically refers herself as a "Trophy Wife" and even encourages other women to follow a similar path. Just more proof that traditional gender expectations are primarily enforced by women themselves instead of what "Feminist" troglodytes might actually believe.It depends to be honest. Most "Conservative" women that I know of are at least true to their own expectations and not complete ans utter hypocrites. The "Feminists" are the problem actually. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/23 11:50 AM |
| 5 | Woman, unironically refers herself as a "Trophy Wife" and even encourages other women to follow a similar path. Just more proof that traditional gender expectations are primarily enforced by women themselves instead of what "Feminist" troglodytes might actually believe.I definitely NOT assuming that all women think exactly like her. I am simply highlighting that throughout history, women have played an important role in the enforcement of traditional gender expectations, in spite of "Feminists" directly holding men responsible for everything as a result of the so called "Patriarchy". There exists plenty of exceptional women out there, but there are also "Sexist" ones as well, similarly to men. But why are we so uncomfortable to admit that women can indeed be "… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/23 11:48 AM |
| 8 | Woman, unironically refers herself as a "Trophy Wife" and even encourages other women to follow a similar path. Just more proof that traditional gender expectations are primarily enforced by women themselves instead of what "Feminist" troglodytes might actually believe.It depends on the woman to be honest. The more "Conservative" ones are at least not complete and utter hypocrites, in spite of me disagreeing with their worldview personally. The self-proclaimed "Feminists" on the other hand... Let's just say that every single "Feminist" I have ever encountered demands wealthy, "high quality" men but since they are "low quality" themselves they usually end up alone. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/23 02:39 AM |
| 4 | Woman, unironically refers herself as a "Trophy Wife" and even encourages other women to follow a similar path. Just more proof that traditional gender expectations are primarily enforced by women themselves instead of what "Feminist" troglodytes might actually believe.Then perhaps, the following video by one of the most "popular" female YouTubers in the dating and relationship advice realm with upwards of 5 million subscribers will definitely suffice: https://youtu.be/wtqK662eYpA?si=T-UP11ONLGgVLu86 | /r/MensRights | 27/10/23 02:17 AM |
| 11 | Woman, unironically refers herself as a "Trophy Wife" and even encourages other women to follow a similar path. Just more proof that traditional gender expectations are primarily enforced by women themselves instead of what "Feminist" troglodytes might actually believe.Look up her YouTube channel's "About Page". She unironically encourages women to practice "Hypergamy" as well... | /r/MensRights | 27/10/23 02:06 AM |
| 1 | Really old MensLib post on why feminist dating advice sucks. (I don't know if this is relevant to this subreddit, but this is a very essential take that we don't see often.)It this was actually true, they would simply kick out all the Tankies from their own communities, but unfortunately that is oftentimes not the case. Although to be fair, every single political movement does a terrible job in policing itself, "Feminism" included. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/10/23 03:23 AM |
| 2 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.Even more delusion by this lass: https://youtu.be/qqv3RkIAcKE?si=xC-N2zPAj7acOrlK | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 07:04 PM |
| 1 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.The woman that has the YouTube channel above is actually a "Feminist"(imagine my shock). She also mentioned that all of her friends have dumped her and that she has no boyfriend at the moment. It is as if the "Traditional" men such women are seeking do not desire to be with "Feminist Fundamentalists" spouting propaganda and conspiracy theories consistently. It is as if they want their cake and to eat it too. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 06:21 PM |
| 5 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.The woman that has the YouTube channel above is actually a "Feminist"(imagine my shock). She also mentioned that all of her friends have dumped her and that she has no boyfriend at the moment. It is as if the "Traditional" men such women are seeking do not desire to be with "Feminist Fundamentalists" spouting propaganda and conspiracy theories consistently. It is as if they want their cake and to eat it too. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 06:20 PM |
| 2 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.The woman that has the YouTube channel above is actually a "Feminist"(imagine my shock). She also mentioned that all of her friends have dumped her and that she has no boyfriend at the moment. It is as if the "Traditional" men such women are seeking do not desire to be with "Feminist Fundamentalists" spouting propaganda and conspiracy theories consistently. It is as if they want their cake and to eat it too. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 06:19 PM |
| 2 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.The woman that has the YouTube channel above is actually a "Feminist"(imagine my shock). She also mentioned that all of her friends have dumped her and that she has no boyfriend at the moment. It is as if the "Traditional" men such women are seeking do not desire to be with "Feminist Fundamentalists" spouting propaganda and conspiracy theories consistently. It is as if they want their cake and to eat it too. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 06:18 PM |
| 9 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.The woman that has the YouTube channel above is actually a "Feminist"(imagine my shock). She also mentioned that all of her friends have dumped her and that she has no boyfriend at the moment. It is as if the "Traditional" men such women are seeking do not desire to be with "Feminist Fundamentalists" spouting propaganda and conspiracy theories consistently. It is as if they want their cake and to eat it too. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 06:17 PM |
| 4 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.The woman that has the YouTube channel above is actually a "Feminist"(imagine my shock). She also mentioned that all of her friends have dumped her and that she has no boyfriend at the moment. It is as if the "Traditional" men such women are seeking do not desire to be with "Feminist Fundamentalists" spouting propaganda and conspiracy theories consistently. It is as if they want their cake and to eat it too. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 06:17 PM |
| 1 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.She reminds me of "TheWizardLiz" lass. But if you actually delve deeper into it, most of these women are basically dating low quality men, because the men they actually desire, do not want them back. Such men are already married to high quality women and the gold-diggers like her will eventually end up getting divorced and die alone. P.S. And in regards to the "slut-shaming" thing, I definitely agree although the vast majority of men(and especially high quality men)will not be comfortable ever m… | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 04:10 PM |
| 8 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe."Feminism" is basically one of the most harmful political ideologies to ever manifest. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 03:56 PM |
| 4 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.Of course I did, I just shared this article in order to showcase the hypocrisy of "Feminists". It was not my intention to ignite overall confusion mate. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 03:47 PM |
| 8 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.As if "Feminists" are any different: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 03:40 PM |
| 1 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.As if "Feminists" are any different: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 03:38 PM |
| 9 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe."Feminist Fundamentalists" really believe the current gender expectations are enforced solely by men, as if women lack any responsibility whatsoever. Personally speaking, I have never ONCE been told to either "man up" or that "men are not supposed to be emotional" by a man in my life. It has only been women spouting such nonsense in my own experience. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 03:33 PM |
| 2 | Woman is seen condemning "Egalitarian" relationships and unironically supporting the so called "Patriarchy". Never forget that throughout human history, women have played an incremental role in sanctioning and preserving the "Patriarchy" in spite of what "Feminists" migh actually believe.That is not to assume that men have not been responsible for the "Patriarchy" throughout human history, far from it. But it does not mean that women are simply helpless victims, characterized by hypoagency, incapable of influencing the societal structures of our society. | /r/MensRights | 21/10/23 03:31 PM |
| 1 | I've never gotten a marriage proposal from a man, it feels sadAccording to various scientific studies, women cheat as much as men do. So you are probably making it all up. | /r/RedPillWomen | 19/10/23 10:31 PM |
| 1 | I've never gotten a marriage proposal from a man, it feels sadWomen make up over 50% of the voting population, so they are absolutely responsible for the politicians they elect in addition to the policies the latter enact as much as the men are. And in case you have not noticed already, the so called Patriarchy" is sanctioned, preserved and maintained by women as well. Women are the primary enforces of gender expectations as a result of their own dating choices. If you want "gender equality" and to be a so called "strong, independent woman" then such attri… | /r/RedPillWomen | 19/10/23 10:10 PM |
| 1 | I've never gotten a marriage proposal from a man, it feels sad"You do not speak for all women, and he would be surprised as to the number of good girls, who want to be treated like naughty girls in the bedroom. No need to elaborate further, but let’s just agree I’ve slept with more women than you have." Nope, but definitely in regards to the majority. Only prostitutes and low quality women want to be treated like whores in the bedroom. There is a thing called "self-worth", which unfortunately many individuals lack(regardless of gender). If you are referrin… | /r/RedPillWomen | 19/10/23 09:56 PM |
| 23 | I have seen a lot of "Feminists" sharing this article recently, supposedly proving that gender differences in spatial reasoning are the result of so called "socialization", therefore the gender disparity in STEM fields is the result of "Sexism". Any counterpoint disproving this argument?Indeed, there is also the fact that over 50% of all psychological studies cannot be replicated, casting doubt on their overall findings. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18248 | /r/MensRights | 19/10/23 04:05 PM |
| 7 | I have seen a lot of "Feminists" sharing this article recently, supposedly proving that gender differences in spatial reasoning are the result of so called "socialization", therefore the gender disparity in STEM fields is the result of "Sexism". Any counterpoint disproving this argument?I mean, isn't there scientific evidence already "proving" that men have higher spatial reasoning abilities as a result of biology? I remember that Steven Pinker wrote about all of these innate gender differences in his widely acclaimed book "The Blank Slate". | /r/MensRights | 19/10/23 04:02 PM |
| 22 | I have seen a lot of "Feminists" sharing this article recently, supposedly proving that gender differences in spatial reasoning are the result of so called "socialization", therefore the gender disparity in STEM fields is the result of "Sexism". Any counterpoint disproving this argument?I mean, isn't there scientific evidence already "proving" that men have higher spatial reasoning abilities as a result of biology? I remember that Steven Pinker wrote about all of these innate gender differences in his widely acclaimed book "The Blank Slate". | /r/MensRights | 19/10/23 04:00 PM |
| 1 | Fertile women were particularly sexually attracted to arrogant, confrontational, unfaithful, muscular, tall, and physically attractive men. Female fertility did not influence the attraction to financial success, intelligence, and kindness.So, according to the study above: Women are attracted to men that are simultaneously arrogant, dominant, muscular and attractive as well as successful, intelligent, kind and warm? How does this even make sense in the first place? Junk science all along. | /r/BlackPillScience | 18/10/23 07:51 PM |
| 1 | The Trend Toward 50/50 CustodyGreat news, although I have to issue a little correction for you. In only 16% of all households the woman is the primary breadwinner, according to the Pew Research Center. In the majority of marriages(e.g 55%), men are still the primary breadwinners. With no evidence of said trend diminishing any time soon. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/23 10:15 PM |
| 1 | A feminist response to men wanting 50/50 equal shared parenting.You just got your hand whooped you freaking imbecile. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/23 09:45 PM |
| 1 | A feminist response to men wanting 50/50 equal shared parenting.You literally lost the debate you freaking "Feminazi Fundamentalist" troglodyte. The other bloke offered you three different studies(with one conducted by the Australian government itself)showcasing that men are MORE likely to lose custody of their children than women. You had nothing to counteract this with, so you basically shut your mouth. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/23 09:44 PM |
| 2 | Same-sex violence (including sexual aggression and intimate partner violence) happens among women, too, especially lesbian women and women in relationships with other women.Most lesbian victims of domestic violence actually reported other WOMEN as the primary perpetrator and not men. Look at the telephone survey conducted by the CDC back in 2010 in case you have any doubts. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/23 12:05 AM |
| 1 | TIL The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships in twice that of gay and straight relationshipsFrom the study you posted: "However, more research is needed to support or refute this conclusion". The study that you linked even admits that of all his is pure speculation, with multiple other studies shared in this thread proving that lesbian relationships have higher rates of domestic violence than heterosexual ones. You are so hellbent in pushing the "Feminazi" narrative, to the point that you are even contradicting yourself. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 11:23 PM |
| 1 | TIL The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships in twice that of gay and straight relationshipsWhat exactly are you referring to by "Reverse Racism" bunkers, if you do not mind me asking? | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 11:19 PM |
| 1 | TIL The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships in twice that of gay and straight relationshipsThere is absolutely no evidence for the "Feminazi" nonsense you are spewing. In fact, men are as likely to develop PTSD from abusive relationships as women are. Congratulations for engaging in the most pernicious form of victim blaming. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 10:41 PM |
| 1 | Women ‘overlooked’ as possible child abusers"Feminists" do, not all women. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 05:42 PM |
| 1 | Women ‘overlooked’ as possible child abusersNope, I have never seen anyone defending women when they commit infanticide. With the sole exceptions of "Femimazis" and SJW's of course. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 05:41 PM |
| 1 | Women ‘overlooked’ as possible child abusers"Feminists" were not responsible for said law. The current "Liberal" administration of Justin Trudeau is. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 05:36 PM |
| 1 | Women ‘overlooked’ as possible child abusersThat mostly happens in the United States and not in the United Kingdom. Think of the "Safe Streets Act" of 1994. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 05:26 PM |
| 3 | Mothers are 2x more likely to commit child abuse, and far more likely to commit fatal abuse (Repost as I had to remove my other account)Look at the statistics that OP shared. Mothers commit the VAST majority of child abuse when compared to fathers. https://www.statista.com/statistics/254893/child-abuse-in-the-us-by-perpetrator-relationship/ Even if one adds up the child abuse cases of live in partners, maternal child abuse VASTLY outnumbers paternal child abuse or abuse by a live in male partner. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 02:04 PM |
| 5 | Mothers are 2x more likely to commit child abuse, and far more likely to commit fatal abuse (Repost as I had to remove my other account)Your are cherry picking the narrative to promote the "Feminazi" narrative. According to the statistics that OP shared, while it is definitely correct that fathers are responsible for 80% child SEXUAL ABUSE, mothers commit up to 78% of FATAL CHILD ABUSE as well as 60% of PHYSICAL ABUSE. Women are more likely to win custody of their own children, even if they happen to be unfit parents as a result of the biased family court system. Of course that would increase the number of children experiencing … | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 01:37 PM |
| 3 | Mothers are 2x more likely to commit child abuse, and far more likely to commit fatal abuse (Repost as I had to remove my other account)But the mothers are the ones committing the abuse you dunce. According to the statistics the individual above shared, mothers commit 78% of fatal child abuse, including 60% of physical abuse. Most of the abuse is the result of mothers THEMSELVES and not the fault of their new male partners. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/23 01:13 PM |
| 35 | Is there any chance the "Duluth Model" will be abandoned any time soon(e.g from the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia and so on)?It is a highly corrosive and discriminatory domestic violence prevention model that automatically assumes that men are always the perpetrators and women are always the victims as a result of the so called "Patriarchy". | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 04:50 PM |
| 19 | Is there any chance the "Duluth Model" will be abandoned any time soon(e.g from the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia and so on)?Hopefully, eventually everyone sees the light at the end of the tunnel. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 04:43 PM |
| 2 | What do you see as the problem with the Duluth model?Why are you launching tirades against Abrahamic Religions when Libtards like yourself are so supportive of Islam? | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 04:31 PM |
| 1 | What do you see as the problem with the Duluth model?And also, hate crimes against Asians increased in pretty much every country, even in neighbouring Canada. Which has absolutely nothing to do with the "Racist" tirades of Donald Trump. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 04:30 PM |
| 1 | What do you see as the problem with the Duluth model?"Patriarchy" has absolutely nothing to do with domestic violence. Pretty much the CDC debunked the whole narrative when the conducted a massive study back in 2021, showcasing the various reasons/parameters of the occurence of domestic violence. And if you really believe that only Abrahamic Religions perpetuate so called "Patriarchy", then you should definitely take a peek at the likes of the Soviet Union, China, North Korea and even Japan, all highly Secular countries. You absolutely have no ide… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 04:26 PM |
| 1 | What do you see as the problem with the Duluth model?Abrahamic Religions are not "Patriarchal" you dunce, well maybe theoretically speaking because most of such holy books were written thousands of years ago. But I doubt the average Religious individual in the Western-World in today's modern era believes in the "Patriarchy". Also, what you highlighted about China has basically been prohibited since plenty of decades, so your argument is moot. | /r/MensRights | 11/10/23 04:22 PM |
| 1 | Robbery and victim blaming: they're okay when women do it!Women get less jail times statistically speaking, regardless of race that is. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/23 02:31 PM |
| 1 | In keeping with DV month I felt we should revist this feminist strongholds discussion about beating men.Complete and utter bollocks. Not only the overwhelming majority of women prefer "masculine" men: https://www.mensjournal.com/health-fitness/unsurprisingly-women-think-strong-guys-are-hotter Even "Feminazis" find such men to be the most attractive: https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men Furthermore, one could oftentimes hear plenty of women openly admitting they are attracted to such men, so the idea that "many women" avoid … | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 11:23 AM |
| 3 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.But the problem is that she feels entitled to it, in addition to not wanting to fill her "traditional feminine" role herself. Basically the perks of Traditionalism without any of the responsibilities afforded to it. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 03:56 AM |
| 2 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.Exactly, the cycle of abuse presented right here. A classic example of trauma bonding in action. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 03:55 AM |
| 6 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.Let them stay single forever for all we care. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 03:54 AM |
| 2 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.Her previous boyfriend basically dumped her, but she made it seem like she ended the relationship. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 03:53 AM |
| 3 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.https://www.reddit.com/r/InstaCelebsGossip/comments/11zf319/is_thewizardliz_toxic_or_am_i_misunderstanding_her/ https://www.reddit.com/r/thewizardliz/comments/15vmgpq/am_i_the_only_one_starting_to_think_shes_actually/ They are letting it all out it seems. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 03:52 AM |
| 5 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.Liz has basically a cult following, commenting on every video that is slightly critical of her. Just like Andrew Tate's fanbase. I despise "Feminazis" so freaking much. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/23 03:50 AM |
| 12 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.She is getting crucified by other(sane)female YouTubers: https://youtu.be/BqzCijqj3GA?si=Cbfo0Y4rYOIzu1va Karma exists after all it seems. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:56 PM |
| 6 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.Would any self-respecting and wealthy men ever commit to a woman like her though? Since most of such men are wary or gold-diggers, I do not necessarily think so to be honest. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:52 PM |
| 12 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.This is why I basically refer to them as "Feminazis". | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:50 PM |
| 15 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.Her fanbase is basically a cult lol. Impressionable and immature teenagers and mentally ill women. Some of her former fans have been sharing their experiences on Reddit. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:49 PM |
| 26 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.She is also an Islamic Fundamentalist, yet simultaneously calls herself a "Feminist". The cognitive dissonance is strong with this one. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:48 PM |
| 35 | Delusional "Feminist Fundamentalist" demands men to take care of her financially and to pay for everything. Such a "strong, independent woman" she happens to be.One of the most toxic YouTubers I have ever encountered. But to be fair, I have also seen plenty of other women condemning her on Reddit. She is basically the female Andrew Tate lol. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:46 PM |
| 1 | So men are never victims of domestic violence?But that is not the result of so called "Toxic Masculinity". The above is the result of "Feminazis" demonizing men as a class. Only assuming they can be perpetrators. Even though the issue above primarily affects men, you still try to put the blame on them with the "Toxic Masculinity" nonsense. Despicable. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 03:00 PM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'Aren't women in the Midwest more "Conservative", therefore more generous and kind in general I would assume that one would find significantly more rude women in hellholes like California and New York if anything. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:39 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'As if naked men would not get inappropriate comments in such scenarios. Eyeroll. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:37 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'Men of high socioeconomic status you mean, which basically comprise 1% of the entire population. The overwhelming majority of men were either treated like fodder in wars, or in the case of minorities as slaves. Similarly to women. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:21 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'Completely wrong. While women are indeed attracted to powerful, masculine and respectful men, they are obviously repelled by psychopathic and violent bad boys. Only women with plenty of emotional baggage are attracted to such terrible men. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:18 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But "Feminazis" tear down other women all the time, especially if such women happen to disagree with them. Aren't they incredibly hypocritical in this respect? | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:08 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But "Feminazis" absolutely do not address "Sexism" perpetrated by women. They even deny that something like this could happen in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 11:04 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'Found the whiny Libtard that wants to blame their failings on others because they refuse to put in the effort. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 10:58 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'That is nothing more than a complete myth. As you referenced Sociology, there is a sociological concept referred to as the "Beauty Exchange Hypothesis". Men are interested in women's beauty, whereas women are mostly inclined to take a man's socioeconomic status into consideration. https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/men-want-beauty-women-want-money-what-people-want-in-a-sexual-partner-20151001-gjyyot.html Arranged marriages and dowry customs are more about impressing women's … | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 10:21 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'I would say that woke Libtards perpetuate it far more than Conservatives to be honest. Especially Libtard or even Bisexual women refusing to date Bisexual men lol. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 10:12 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But other men are not the only ones that are passing judgment on your clothing choices. Women do as well, do not ever think that women are blameless and it is all the fault of the supposed "Patriarchy". Women have significantly more freedom to dress however they personally desire, with most of the judgment coming from other women if anything. As many women have documented in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 10:04 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But other men are not the only ones that are passing judgment on your clothing choices. Women do as well, do not ever think that women are blameless and it is all the fault of the supposed "Patriarchy". Women have significantly more freedom to dress however they personally desire, with most of the judgment coming from other women if anything. As many women have documented in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 10:00 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But other men are not the only ones that are passing judgment on your clothing choices. Women do as well, do not ever think that women are blameless and it is all the fault of the supposed "Patriarchy". Women have significantly more freedom to dress however they personally desire, with most of the judgment coming from other women if anything. As many women have documented in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 09:58 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But other men are not the only ones that are passing judgment on your clothing choices. Women do as well, do not ever think that women are blameless and it is all the fault of the supposed "Patriarchy". Women have significantly more freedom to dress however they personally desire, with most of the judgment coming from other women if anything. As many women have documented in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 09:56 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But other men are not the only ones that are passing judgment on your clothing choices. Women do as well, do not ever think that women are blameless and it is all the fault of the supposed "Patriarchy". Women have significantly more freedom to dress however they personally desire, with most of the judgment coming from other women if anything. As many women have documented in this thread. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 09:54 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'He is literally lying lol. I have been in Sweden, most men wear either business casual or suits to work. What the Libtard above described is the exception rather than the norm. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 09:42 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'It is not even in the big cities where things like that go on. Even in the rest of Texas, one can observe men dressing however they desire without anyone giving a toss. Libtards are completely delusional. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 09:40 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But the fact that they proposed such nonsense in the first place is the problem. Nobody could have even made a similar proposition to either America or the UK. That tells you everything you need to know about Sweden's supposed Libtard credentials. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 09:33 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'Is this why the current Prime Minister of Sweden admitted that no other country in Europe has seen the violence the country is currently experiencing, basically insinuating Sweden is becoming a Third-World hellhole? https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/09/29/sweden-calls-on-military-to-end-wave-of-gang-violence/ Libtards are absolutely delusional. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 09:28 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'But "Femimazis" do not actually believe in the so called "gender freedom" you are referring to. It is pretty self-explanatory, plenty of examples in this subreddit alone in case you have any doubts. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 09:24 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'It absolutely does not "exist". Women's fashion is far more diverse than men's fashion. Women have the actual privilege to express themselves however they see fit, whereas men get the short end of the stick if they ever decide to experiment with fashion by having homophobic insults hurled at them. In fact, women oftentimes recieve judgment from other women(instead of men)in regards to their clothing choices, as many women have declared in the current thread. The above notion completely oblirates… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 08:38 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'The overwhelming majority of "Feminists" are Radicals and Extemists. So called "Moderate Feminists" are basically unicorns lol. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 08:27 AM |
| 1 | 'Male privilege is...'"Progressives" do not want equality or empowerment of women. This is the primary reason on why the oftentimes reveal themselves to be some of the biggest abusers of women lol. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/23 08:21 AM |
| 1 | Curvelinear effect of height on reproductive success --- average height males have the most children --- literature reviewHeight is mostly down to genetics, nutrition and other environmental factors only account for about 20% of overall height: https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/understanding/traits/height/ And the so called "Flynn Effect" has been debunked multiple times already, with even James Flynn acknowledging the substantial influence of genetics in regards to intelligence. What we are observing right now is a DECREASE in overall IQ scores in many De eloped countries, in spite of continuous socioeconomic devel… | /r/BlackPillScience | 02/10/23 07:43 PM |
| 1 | GeNdEr EqUaLiTyDo you have any source for that? | /r/MensRights | 29/09/23 05:21 PM |
| 1 | Gender Suicide ParadoxMen's mental health issues are less likely to be taken seriously than women's. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/23 04:44 PM |
| 2 | Spanish woman wears beard to feel safe walking at night, even though about 2/3 of homicide victims in Spain are menOf course, Spain actually has low crime rates in general, according to official government statistics that is. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/23 02:28 AM |
| 1 | Spanish woman wears beard to feel safe walking at night, even though about 2/3 of homicide victims in Spain are menAbsolutely destroyed that "Feminazi Fundamentalist". You cannot get more accurate than quoting official statistics from the freaking United Nations. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/23 02:20 AM |
| 1 | Spanish woman wears beard to feel safe walking at night, even though about 2/3 of homicide victims in Spain are men40% of sex trafficking victims are men, minors and usually immigrants. If you are an American citizen and reside away from crime ridden areas, the chances of you falling a victim of sex trafficking are virtually zero. And lastly, are you literally trying to minimize his experiences, by engaging in despicable victim blaming? | /r/MensRights | 29/09/23 02:18 AM |
| 2 | Spanish woman wears beard to feel safe walking at night, even though about 2/3 of homicide victims in Spain are menCalifornia and New York actually have the highest sex trafficking rates in the the United States, followed by Florida. Texas is way lower on the list, even if such exceptions to the rule unfortunately exist. P.S. Usually areas with high immigrant populations are plagued by sex trafficking, because most victims of sex trafficking are oftentimes immigrants themselves. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/23 02:05 AM |
| 1 | Spanish woman wears beard to feel safe walking at night, even though about 2/3 of homicide victims in Spain are menTo be fair, most of such protests and fake attention are by "Feminazi" organizations. Most Mexicans actually do not give a toss, they do not differentiate by gender. They are already aware their crime rates are abysmally high anyway. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/23 02:01 AM |
| 1 | Promiscuity is in fact a good predictor of infidelity. Indeed, promiscuity among females accounted for almost twice as much variance in infidelity (r^2 = .45) as it did for males (r^2 = .25).Women are more likely to engage in so called "slut shaming" than men. Most women do not identify as "Feminists" either. You absolutely have no idea of what you are talking about mate. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/09/23 07:52 PM |
| 2 | Promiscuity is in fact a good predictor of infidelity. Indeed, promiscuity among females accounted for almost twice as much variance in infidelity (r^2 = .45) as it did for males (r^2 = .25).I am pretty sure that "observations" supported by scientific evidence are pretty truthful. And I am definitely not an "Incel" myself, quite the contrary. P.S. I highly doubt that you have a girlfriend with that attitude, the "putting others on a pedestal" demeanour. And then you berate men for their personal sexual preferences, attempting to control their bodies and whom they decide to date, even though they do not happen to affect you in any, way shape or form. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/09/23 07:51 PM |
| 1 | Promiscuity is in fact a good predictor of infidelity. Indeed, promiscuity among females accounted for almost twice as much variance in infidelity (r^2 = .45) as it did for males (r^2 = .25).And it does not change the fact that it is other individuals "body and choice" not to date such individuals in the first place. You lads can never understand that personal freedom goes both ways. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/09/23 07:39 PM |
| 1 | Looks/Money/Status vs Seduction/Behavior - Who is Right?Where exactly Because I have never read such stories myself. This is also backed up by research, indicating that women are significantly more likely to engage in "emotional infidelity" than a physical one. That is obviously not to state that women are not sexual beings, far from it ti be exact. It is a simple prerogative that men and women have different priorities that they are longing for in life. | /r/BlackPillScience | 27/09/23 08:23 AM |
| 2 | Physical Attractiveness is the Strongest Predictor of Initial Romantic Interest in Both Sexes; No Evidence Male Personality Plays Any Role for Women (Luo & Zhang, 2009)That is absolutely correct. Tell me you have no clue of what the "Central Limit Theorem" is? https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/central_limit_theorem.asp&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwin5ayFr8eBAxWJ4QIHHXiyAcoQFnoECAYQAw&usg=AOvVaw3dChwbQHIJ3f0cmC2xik96 | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/09/23 03:48 AM |
| 1 | Physical Attractiveness is the Strongest Predictor of Initial Romantic Interest in Both Sexes; No Evidence Male Personality Plays Any Role for Women (Luo & Zhang, 2009)I mean, you are falling Religion "bullshit", when you are literally denying the findings of scientific studies because they happen to contradict your preconceived notions. "Feminist Fundamentalism" is not based on facts either, it is absolutely based on hatred and intolerance. Hence the violence, numerous censorship attempts and overall "Fascism" on top of it all. Your ilk is no different than the "Incels" you are criticizing, if anything they happen to be the "Female Incels" lol. | /r/BlackPillScience | 26/09/23 03:45 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?Mate, every outlet from the Daily Mail, to The Sun, the Daily Express and The Telegraph has published articles debunking the entire "Gender Wage Gap" nonsense. Heck, even the Economist has published a while back refuting the entire thing. It is pretty much only the Libtards and the Guardianistas believing such tripe. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 02:12 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?Typical "Feminazi" nonsense. I hope that you work on a more healthy environment now, without the "Feminazi" bolkocks. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 02:02 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?The "Gender Wage Gap" amongst Millenials is not the result of "DEI" policies, but because women earn the overwhelming majority of university degrees, which obviously boosts their income prospects and career opportunities. Plus there is the fact that when women choose to stay at home with their children, their pay obviously takes a toll on top of it all. But that is the result of the personal choices they make and not necessarily so called "gender discrimination". Unfortunately, the actual inequa… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:57 AM |
| 2 | Is the wage gap real?Indeed, anything that comes out of Forbes should be automatically discarded. Considering they even debunked their own premise in their article, by admitting the controlled "Gender Wage Gap" lists at 99 cents for every dollar. Which is basically nonexistent. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:48 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?We should absolutely not look into the choices that different individuals make. Unless coerced, we should automatically assume that people have the freedom to make their own decisions, instead of treating them like mindless drones that are supposedly told by others how to conduct themselves. That is incredibly paternalistic and frankly dehumanizing. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:44 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?But the individual above gave you multiple examples, including from countries outside the United States. Which you obviously decided to ignore, for reasons of political convenience. The only one with confirmation bias here is yourself and nobody else. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:34 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?Did such things happened in both the UK and Scotland though. Or did the "Feminazis" fail? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:32 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?Absolute nonsense "Feminist Fundamentalists", are fighting against what we stated, everywhere in the world. Including in the most influential country in the world, the United States that is. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:31 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?If I may ask, what happened recently in Florida? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:28 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?Absolutely not, "Feminism" globally does not fight for exactly "this". The National Organization Of Women, which is the largest "Feminist Fundamentalist" organization in America, has fought against equal parenting rights for decades. You are not convincing anyone boyo. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:19 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?To be fair, paid parental leave does not exist in the United States at all, whereas most countries with such entitlements also include paternity leave into the equation. You are completely correct about the rest though. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:18 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?But they definitely do, unless you assume that women are mindless drones, incapable of making their own decisions And nursing, is one of the most highly compensated professions, even when compared to many other traditionally "male dominated" fields such as mathematics, computing and engineering. What a pathetic "argument" you put forward. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:13 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?What? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:09 AM |
| 1 | Is the wage gap real?The so called "Gender Wage Gap" is a completely fabricated myth with no credible evidence whatsoever to back it up. Even "Liberal" media outlets like the CBS and the Economist believe it is a myth, in addition to a massive study by the United States Department Of Labour back in 2019, basically debunking the entire concept. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/23 01:05 AM |
| 1 | Is The Patriarchy Real?A little correction there for you, probably most of such women are "Feminists", which obviously do not represent the entire female sex. In fact, less than 30% of women identify as "Feminists" in the United States. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/23 02:33 AM |
| 0 | Is The Patriarchy Real?How can you actually claim to be "Pro-Choice" when you support gun-control? How can you claim to be in favour of "black lives", when you support defunding the police, which will expose minorities, including others, to criminal activity? You are you so freaking hypocritical? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/23 10:30 AM |
| 1 | Domestic ViolenceIf you do not mind me asking, what country is that mate? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/23 03:58 AM |
| 1 | Domestic ViolenceYou are not looking at the big picture you freaking imbecile. Men are as likely to be victims of domestic violence as women, yet they receive no support by the government whatsoever as a result of ideological reasons. Not to mention that since men feel shame and stigma when it comes to sharing such experiences, actual rates might be even higher. You are so hellbent to pursh the narrative that women are supposedly "oppressed", but you end up engaging in some nasty victim blaming and surprisingly … | /r/MensRights | 17/09/23 03:44 AM |
| 1 | Domestic ViolenceAbsolutely incorrect. Even a "Feminist Fundamentalist" admitted that single father households do vastly better than single mother ones. Besides, the overwhelming majority of criminals were raised by single mothers, including domestic abusers and rapists(where 56% of them were also sexually abused by women). Here is the relevant article in case you are wondering: https://medium.com/the-knowledge-of-freedom/single-father-households-do-vastly-better-than-single-mother-heres-the-real-reason-why-8a7f… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/23 03:35 AM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Anecdotal evidence does not constitute actual evidence. According to a new poll commissioned by iftlstudies.org, 72% of Americans expressed the desire to get married, down from just 75%% a couple of decades ago. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:34 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Only 16% of women outearn their husbands, with the rest either married to men of equal or superior means. So called "equality" and "independence" are not attributes that "Feminists" desire. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:32 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?There is no "population decline", but a population boom actually. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:30 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?You will definitely not. Just 16% of women outearn their husbands, which implies that women are simply picking men that are either equal or have a higher income than them. Them being financially independent or the "generations" in auesiotn is completely irrelevant. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:28 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?The study that you linked was basically retracted as a result of serious methodological flaws. There exists no credible scientific evidence that men are more likely to abandon their spouses in case of illness. I could not find the "thousands" of studies that you are taking about on Google either. P.S. Here you go in case you have any doubts: https://www.deseret.com/2015/8/4/20569426/study-that-found-husbands-prone-to-leave-sick-wives-was-flawed-researchers-say#a-coding-error-created-a-false-conc… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:22 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?The second study published in 2015 was not retracted, the one published in 2009 was. The second study simply debunked the "findings" of the first. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:18 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Completely and utterly fabricated delusional conspiracy theories. My sister works in healthcare(she is actually an Oncologist), and has never received such "training" that you are talking about. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:15 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Many others in this thread have given evidence to the contrary, debunking many of such "Feminist" assertions. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:14 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Said study was basically retracted as a result of various methodological flaws as many others have mentioned already. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Even the probability of so called "medical bankruptcy" is extremely rare in the United States. Less than 8% of the American population lacks healthcare coverage, with an even less percentage that has experienced difficulty with paying enormous medical bills. I remember a study conducted in Canada that showed Canadians are more likely to have suffered "medical bankruptcy" than Americans. Which debunks that "Feminist" argument as well. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:09 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Femtards simply suffer from the "women are wonderful effect". They might claim they are supposedly not "Sexist", but they simultaneously believe women to be more ethical and superior to men. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:06 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Saving this for later as well mate! | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:04 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Indeed, the top comment of this thread basically cleared everything up for me. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:03 PM |
| 2 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?By other horrible women of course. Real women will never do such a despicable thing, and the rest are going to simply end up alone. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 09:00 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Interesting, I guess that is true as well. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 08:57 PM |
| 0 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Of course, because if Femtards were willing to accept reality, they would simply come to the conclusion that women are not oppressed and so called "Sexism" and "Gender Inequality" do not exist And since the above tripes and fundamental aspects of their worldview, they want to "prove" their existence so they continue to be relevant. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 08:52 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?The fact that men get harsher criminal sentences in comparison to women is such a well known and supported fact that even the likes of The Guardian and the Huffington Post have reported about it. "Feminism" is basically a Religion at this point, with all the Fundamentalism, indoctrination, reactionary attitudes and cult-like mentality that come with it. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 08:47 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?Appreciate banks links mate. I was pretty convinced that it was just another "Feminist Fundamentalis" conspiracy theory, but I simply wanted the evidence to back up my assumptions. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 08:36 PM |
| 1 | Is there any credible evidence to support the Feminist Fundamentalist notion that men are more "likely" to abandon their spouse in case of an illness?But reading all the "Far-Left" propaganda mouthpieces, including the highly upvoted "Feminist Fundamentalist" nonsense on Reddit is somehow "convincing"? | /r/MensRights | 14/09/23 08:35 PM |
| 1 | Hi, does anyone where I can find the statistics of female on male rape vs male on female rape so I can use for a debate?Although I generally agree with you stated above, as far as I am concerned Mary P Koss has not advised other government agencies outside of the United States. Although by advising both the CDC and the FBI, one becomes prominent and influential enough in the United States at least. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/23 09:43 AM |
| 1 | The case of Kibbutz. This shows that we are right about the gender issues and reason of the gender roles.The measures were dropped because they were basically discriminatory. Even though Sweden is "Feminist", it is also "Liberal" and "Egalitarian". A few years back for example "Feminists" attempted to prohibit men urinating while standing up, but it was obviously a rather unsuccessful and a much "ridiculed" endeavour. In the United States, such a measure will not only have been accepted, but it would have been celebrated on top of it. Do not forget there still exist female only scholarships and gen… | /r/MensRights | 29/08/23 09:24 AM |
| 1 | Meet the puritans who think sex is bad for women - WHY FEMINISTS ARE SO DOWN ON SEXConsidering how the Leftists and SJW's have been behaving as of recently, I am convinced your ilk has basically become the new "Religious Right". And Authoritarianism, tribalism and fear mongering are absolutely trait associated with the Left. Do not even get me started on the fact that Leftists are motivated by emotion rather than logic(especially on debates regarding the Environment or so called "Oppression"), and are also LESS likely to treat individuals equally(regardless of their immutable … | /r/MensRights | 29/08/23 05:57 AM |
| 1 | Male feminists, why?The incumbent Joe Biden Administration is primarily responsible for the current worsening of the "class devides", yet imbeciles like yourself continue blaming the non-existent "Conservative" boogeyman. The propaganda is incredibly successful, from what it appears. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/23 07:01 PM |
| 1 | Male feminists, why?What a load of libtard nonsense. So called "income inequality" is SHIRKING, instead of worsening over time, in spite of CEO's growing wealthier, as one economist in the following article accurately explains: https://www.hoover.org/research/income-inequality-isnt-problem P.S. I would advise you to stop getting your news from the likes of MSNBC as well as Buzzfeed(which are both owned by incredibly wealthy individuals), and refrain from falling for literal propaganda and misinformation. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/23 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Male feminists, why?Libtard polices are basically exacerbating "income inequality"(just look at the incumbent Joe Biden Administration). Liberalism is basically the enemy of humanity and the working class. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/23 06:46 PM |
| 1 | Male feminists, why?Libtard polices are basically exacerbating "income inequality"(just look at the incumbent Joe Biden Administration). Liberalism is basically the enemy of humanity and the working class. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/23 06:46 PM |
| 1 | Lesbian domestic violence proves it’s not just a male problemWell, it has been scientifically proven that genetics contribute substantially to the development of mental illness, in conjunction with environmental factors on top of it. That "Feminist" inspired narrative of denying as well as dismissing the role of biology and genetics on human behaviour is not only scientifically erroneous, it is also dangerous in addition. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/23 12:09 PM |
| 1 | What did you guys think of this Instagram post? What’s the best way to respond to it?Has the changed at all though? In the last couple of years that is. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/23 10:29 AM |
| 1 | What did you guys think of this Instagram post? What’s the best way to respond to it?Are perpetrator's receiving equivalent punishment(for the same crime), regardless of gender however? | /r/MensRights | 25/07/23 10:26 AM |
| 1 | What did you guys think of this Instagram post? What’s the best way to respond to it?Although as far as I am concerned, rape receives similar punishments regardless of the perpetrator's gender. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/23 10:24 AM |
| 5 | Men are 57% of all rape victims and women are most of their rapists, per CDC data. Feminist propaganda about rape is false.You are literally accusing men of somehow "bloating" their reports in regards to their experiences of sexual assault, because they have a "clandestine genda" to disavow the seriousness of sexual violence, instead of maybe admitting that men underreport their experiences precisely as a result of the immense STIGMA surrounding male sexual abuse victims. And you have the nerve to state that you happen to stand for gender-equality by calling yourself a "Feminist". Absolutely detestable. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/23 04:26 PM |
| 1 | Men are 57% of all rape victims and women are most of their rapists, per CDC data. Feminist propaganda about rape is false.Sexual coercion is not a crime in the United States. Nobody can be charged via a court of law in such a manner. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/23 04:12 PM |
| 1 | Men's Looks Matter More Than Women Admit, Study ShowsDid you even read the study at all or not? The study stated that women absolutely DO care about looks far more than they would like to admit, and will consider a man's personality ONLY if he has passed a certain looks threshold. This is also been proven by multiple scientific studies over the years: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/dating-and-mating/201701/why-physical-attraction-matters-and-when-it-might-not https://sites.psu.edu/aspsy/2020/04/10/do-looks-matter-in-a-relationship/ Women … | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/07/23 08:13 PM |
| 1 | Looks ratings 101: Nearly all studies show a Cronbach's alpha > 0.80 for inter-rater reliability. What does this mean? Putting the neomancr hypothesis to the testBut you did not "disprove" anything of what he stated. You are simply disregarding the scientific studies OP has shared because you find the results "inconvenient". You are engaging in science-denial for political purposes. | /r/BlackPillScience | 09/07/23 06:54 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter