TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Noob_master_slayer Archive

View 19 posts and 465 comments by Noob_master_slayer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2079

Social IssuesNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:29 AM
1630

Social IssuesNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights03/03/22 03:23 PM
1484

FeminismNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights10/10/21 09:36 AM
1150

Social IssuesNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights20/11/21 01:38 PM
963

FeminismNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights08/11/21 07:23 AM
351

Social IssuesNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights20/11/21 01:48 PM
211

DiscriminationNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights22/03/21 09:45 AM
117

HumourNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights11/04/21 10:01 AM
77

Social IssuesNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights29/11/20 08:28 AM
25

False AccusationNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:50 PM
5

FeminismNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights08/05/21 09:54 AM
2

DiscriminationNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights10/10/20 11:10 AM
2

DiscriminationNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights21/12/20 02:29 PM
2

GeneralNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:09 AM
1

HumourNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights30/03/21 11:52 AM
1

Noob_master_slayer/r/MensRights22/12/20 06:26 AM
1

FeminismNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights09/11/21 09:48 AM
1

HumourNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights11/11/20 04:55 PM
1

HumourNoob_master_slayer/r/MensRights11/11/20 04:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It really puzzles me but I don't understand how society has taken feminism to be gospels truth. It's like nobody even questions it's statements, rather swallowing it as it is.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 06:12 AM
6

I'm not sure where you live but where I live we have male only gyms and believe me I prefer them. In the presence of girls, you don't want to grunt or make noise during PR attempts, but in the presence of the buys? Haleluja!
/r/MensRights02/04/22 06:47 AM
40

Not related but it's nonetheless weird to me how some men are literally harrased by women against their wish but some men literally long for any such thing to happen to them.
/r/MensRights02/04/22 06:46 AM
1

State, to the parents of little boys: "Well, who are we to say how you bring up your little one?" Actually the way I understand it is that European countries are not supportive of circumcision the way Americans are. Instead, they chose not to denounce it because of fear of being labelled "aNtiSeMiTiC" whatever the fuck that means in today's world. Apparently protecting baby boys is less important than the ego of a bronze age sheep herding slave trading cult.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 05:29 AM
11

See thing is, I don't care whether circumcision is as bad as FGM. In fact, as far as I understand the most common form of FGM is actually much less destructive than the most common form of circumcision in terms of tissue removal. But what ticks me is how society is apathetic and uncaring towards the literal abuse of newborn babies so long they are male. It's honestly depressing how little society cares about us men, we represent 80% of suicides, 99%+ of mutilations, 75% of homeless, but what do …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:06 AM
6

Why not? Doesn't it boil your blood looking at the utter double standards that circumcision is associated with? I'm not here to debate whether or not circumcision is equal to FGM, but the fact that people are okay with hacking off the most sensitive bit of a A FUCKING NEWBORN BABY so long there is a penis is absolutely the epitome of disgusting inhumanity. Why is it, that nicking a girls clitoral hood isn't okay, but chopping of the most sensitive bit (foreskin) of a boy is okay? This to me spea…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 03:02 AM
2

Don't worry about it. It's good ol' virtue signalling. Women saying "men need to be more emotional" is just their way of sounding virtuous.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 02:59 PM
28

Exactly. Women saying "men need to show emotions" is pure literal virtue signalling. Most women lose whatever attraction they might have to a man the moment he shows emotion.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 02:09 PM
1

Hmmmm, I agree that relationships are hard for ugly women, totally, but if you want casual sex or something, it should be extremely easy for you to get it. Also, this post isn't about looks and the opposite sex, it's much more than that, I'm talking about non-sexual contact, which women recieve plenty' of from each other. People sympathise much more with women compared to men. Hey, if you cry, at least someone will console you instead of saying "woman up, women don't cry".
/r/MensRights26/03/22 06:48 AM
3

Finally, my hand won't get pregnant 💯
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:55 AM
5

Yeah, let's have breaks for periods and watching romcom.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 01:48 AM
8

Lmao, it's funny how they are "all independent and strong wahmen" and "a woman needs a man like a bicycle needs a fish" until war comes calling. Then, all of a sudden they find it hard to live without men...the cognitive dissonance of some women really amuses me sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 01:46 AM
16

Thing most people don't realize is how women unconsciously or consciously take benefit of masculinity. Throughout my life the most feminist woke women have been the ones who have said "why, aren't you a man?" or "what kind of a man are you?" whenever I refused to do something dangerous for them, for example lighting a wood furnace. They know that men are insecure about their masculinity, so they take advantage by gaslighting men into doing the dangerous work for them. The same is true for war, w…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:22 AM
1

Little do they understand that 99% of wars occur because of resource scarcity. Historically, people plundered each other mostly because of the need for resources in a world with scarce resources. Having female heads wouldn't solve scarcity, lol, as at the end of the day everyone is selfish, so nation A will prioritize it's survival even if it comes down to the extinction of nation B. What's between the legs of the leader won't make an iota of difference...
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:56 AM
1

Why not? We live in a free world where supply-demand works. If a woman is freely willing to provide sex for a fixed price, and someone is willing to pay, what's wrong with that? Apart from religious reasons, which I reckon don't matter anymore at least in the West, what argument exists to ban prostitution? As I said, it's state controlled, so no chance of trafficking and STDs. See, if you have nothing to add to an argument, don't waste server space by typing "WTF".
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:49 AM
10

It's actually an interesting peek on evolutionary psychology. Evolution favors men who are competitive and seek to defeat other men. You can actually think of it like this. The majority male legislators have an evolutionary incentive if other men die in large numbers, it makes sense, his reproductive success increases! There's a reason why men have such small in-group preference, ie men would rather save women than those of their own kind, why? Because it's in a man's evolutionary advantage if o…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:05 AM
5

Yes, society would rather want "non-contributing" men to just die for the "greater good" of society.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 12:57 PM
23

Of course, patriarchy saves soooo many men by restricting them from leaving the country and forcing them to fight an enemy! Soooooo much patriarchy, am I right?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 03:25 PM
76

You know what actually shocks me? The way they use "vulnerable people" (which OBVIOUSLY excludes men). Tell me for one second, HOW is a man more safe from aerial carpet bombing or a 120mm tank round? How is it that women, children, and old people are "more vulnerable" from weapons? I mean do men have special body armour, or are men not even considered "people" at this point?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 12:50 PM
1

Really? Lol?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 12:27 PM
5

So gay men were always sexist?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 01:59 AM
2

Male disposability. That's it. Men are disposable so any vice happening to them is a social benefit, as there is less consumption of resources.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 08:15 AM
28

They have a penis. That's the ultimate crime. I used to be a huge men's rights activists, but I've given up. Why? Because I noticed that society doesn't even have sympathy for baby boys (who are mutilated en masse), then I realized that this movement is hopeless. Society's apathy towards men is biologically grounded, because of our unlimited sperm, so much so that even little baby boys don't escape from this prejudice. I've left my activism because I've realised that no amount of activism will o…
/r/MensRights12/03/22 03:37 AM
5

Ah yes, the 18-year old conscript who's forcefully dragged away from his family (which is escaping to Poland) SIMPLY because he has a penis, is obviously not an issue to the United Nations?
/r/MensRights11/03/22 05:16 PM
5

Rich white men? Can you for one second think OUTSIDE the United Steaks of America? You know that the world is bigger than that shithole of a country? 7.7 B people live outside of that little sphere of yours, and no we are not "controlled by white men". and that it is ridiculous to expect anyone regardless of gender to sacrifice themselves for corporate or capitalistic gains. It's not the fault of women that men have shitty jobs because women have not been in the ruling class for the majority of …
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:31 PM
9

Men die in the workplace for worthless scumbags like you. Men don't go to coal mines because they enjoy it, they do it because society expects them to provide for a family. Women have social safety nets in place to prevent them from ending up as homeless, men don't. Men have to work. As toilet cleaners, as electric grid maintainers, as truck drivers or as coal miners. There's no toxic masculinity there. That piece of shit on r/2XChromosomes makes everything about women and says how the fact that…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:11 PM
6

Because men are more depressed and exhausted with life.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:08 PM
22

Like the fact that men ACTUALLY commit suicide 4x more doesn't bother this piece of shit is sad. What does it tell you when 80% of all suicides are men? They're more depressed because they use more lethal methods.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:06 PM
22

Women are seen as children in adult bodies by law. No wonder female accountability is low.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 07:55 AM
1

I am living in an Asian country, and yes I can relate. I envy Western culture where people hug and handshake so often.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 06:39 AM
6

And dare we complain, then we aren't "real men"🤣
/r/MensRights06/03/22 03:03 AM
1

You might be an exception but most women are very comfortable in physically touching each other. Unlike men, women aren't scared of being perceived lesbians.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 09:59 AM
23

I can understand that. Marraige has become a joke in today's world and is seriously not worth a man's time. I really hope legal state-controlled prostitution becomes a thing, so then men wouldn't be forced to settle with miserable women just to get laid...
/r/MensRights03/03/22 05:19 PM
-11

Give a quick hug to your male friends when you greet them You know what happens then, right? Either they shove me away "because it's gay!" or others think I am gay. Either way you're considered gay.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 05:18 PM
22

Society believes "you deserve to be loved" if it's a woman. As Chris Rock said "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is loved under the condition that he provides something". And even then that "love" is NOT for the man, rather it's for his provision, once that goes away (say the man is fired) then the love disappears overnight. Honestly? I sometimes wish I was born a female. I'm at college at the moment, and it's been over 2 months since I last hugged someone (my fath…
/r/MensRights03/03/22 03:10 PM
10

Neither should you. You're a psychopathic monster who derives pleasure from the pain of kids
/r/MensRights02/03/22 07:53 AM
3

Exactly. I once had a long heated discussion with a toxic feminist on this subreddit. She insisted that because men ejaculate, their consent to parenthood is thus assumed if they ejaculate into a woman, deliberately or accidentally. I rightfully asked her if a woman consciously spreading her legs constitutes consent for parenthood, and she said no...hmm, the double standards.....seems like they want equality but without responsibility.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:20 AM
6

You can use the same argument for FGM. The clitoral hood stores smegma and filth in the very same way. The problem isn't circumcision or FGM. The problem when it is done involuntarily to newborns.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:18 PM
4

It never was about equality. It's one of the largest myths that men had a lot of power, whereas women had none. Guess how much power did a peasent male have in the middle of the 1500s? None. Peasents, men and women, were mere slaves to their imperial overlords.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 03:00 AM
10

They literally don't understand that men don't start war, humans do. In a hypothetical female run world, guess what, resources would STILL be scarce. Throughout our history as a species, we have fought wars over resources and access to resources. If women led the world, guess what, wars would still happen...just perhaps not for food, instead for make-up pigments🤣
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:53 PM
60

Better yet wait for the article "1000 killed, including 1 woman". I'm honestly sick of it. The way men are being treated as subhumans to sacrifice their lives for their pussy-owning overlords!
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:19 AM
12

Ah yes, classical male disposability. Just because someone has a cock between their legs, they thus are obliged to be ridden by bullets and missiles, whilst superior humans who have a vagina are completely safe! Wow, so much equality!
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:18 AM
15

Ah, so much male privillege, am I right? Feminists who claim that male privillege is a thing, exist in such a fantasy world that their instinctive reaction reading this would be and I quote "Men started the war, so they should fight the war".
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:17 AM
21

And manspreading. How dare he spread his legs a few nanometers apart💢😠
/r/MensRights25/02/22 08:16 AM
-1

There's not a correlation, I know, it's satire. I'm an average looking guy, average height (5'8) yet I pack more meat than basically everyone. I'm not boasting, but as per calcsd I'm in the 99.8%tile in size. Sadly, people do actually make this wrong correlation. A lot of people subconsciously assume taller guys have bigger dicks. Nothing sadder than a Chad with a tiny schlong. Exactly lol. He is a magnet to all girls but the moment he pulls down the pant, it's a disaster lmaaoo.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 05:30 PM
7

They aren't allergic perse, they're just addicted to the alpha dogs shlong. Beta Billy's wrinkly small shlong doesn't give her the tingles. It's that simple. AF/BB.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 05:03 AM
18

Just reply with "your worthless existence". Absolute Chad move.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 05:01 AM
35

Funny thing is, it's the SAME people who bitch and moan about "tOxiC mAsCuLinIty rEeEe!!" and they are also the same people to say "yOu ArEnT mAn EnOuGh". Irony.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/02/22 05:01 AM
1

Problem is if we do that, 95% of us would die single. You see, it's a biological reality that men cannot be choosers. We can have standards, but then we need to be okay with staying single. For. A. Long. Time.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 11:23 AM
72

There was a joke that comes to mind. "Why are there feminists in Japan?" -Because they hunt all the whales. Perfectly applies here. All strength to Japan for not bowing down to the feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights18/02/22 04:28 AM
3

If you object to their utter misuse of the word "incel" they say that incels are all mysoginistic. But if you say all feminist's are misandrists? Then it's that they are not "real feminists". Feminists: How dare you use my own spells against me, Potter?
/r/MensRights17/02/22 07:39 PM
2

Just tell them the fact that black merchants in Africa sold other black people (most often enemy tribes) to white slave owners for the Atlantic trade. Does that fact in any way reduce the severity of chattel slavery? No, right? The same is true for men. Even if somehow we assume all male issues are caused by men, it doesn't reduce the severity of it.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 09:57 AM
3

My body my choice. I get to decide where I stick my dick. End of discussion.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 08:56 PM
3

I literally saw a post of a 16yo couple with kids, and the man said something which was obviously wrong. Comments were like "leave his ass!, "you deserve better" and so on. No consideration for the 16 years of investments, all the hundreds of times he's been good to her, or the kids. Pure bonkers!
/r/MensRights15/02/22 08:36 PM
2

Too bad, I'd be cancelled into oblivion...
/r/MensRights14/02/22 04:57 PM
3

Exactly. I once proposed that before a man and a woman have consensual sex, they should have applications on their phone where they verify their identity, mention their names and show that there is no duress. Once that's done, a legal document that legally binds both to NOT have children as a result of this encounter is virtually signed binding both adults to a few conditions: (a) The woman, as per this document would agree that she doesn't want a child thus a pregnancy should be either aborted …
/r/MensRights14/02/22 04:07 PM
1

It would take at least half a dozen fit men to even pin her down, let alone rape her.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/22 08:30 AM
2

What?
/r/MensRights09/02/22 04:36 PM
19

Not Google's fault really. It's just a bunch of algorithms and AI functions that reflect the beliefs and opinions of society.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:24 PM
1

Right, but that's not the point. A 14 year old's consent is legally invalid and the teacher has the psychological power of being an adult which can severely fuck up the psychology of a 14yo child.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 06:06 PM
5

Even then they won't consider it rape as long as feminist's regurgitate their "rApE iS aBouT pOwEr aNd cLeArLy tHe 14yo bOy HaS pEnIs!! PeNis=PoWer!!!".
/r/MensRights08/02/22 06:05 PM
2

Actually they are more privilleged than princesses and queens because they are allowed the comforts of queens but without the restrictions that queens faced such as not being allowed to move freely etc
/r/MensRights03/02/22 03:45 PM
1

Exactly, people nowadays blindly belief fourth wave feminism is all for equality. Equality? That ended in like the second wave. Third wave onwards, it has become female supremacy.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 03:27 PM
3

Feminism used to be a bastion for equality and egalitarianism back in the suffrage era. Now it's just a hateful bigoted belief system based on the erroneous belief that women in developed countries are somehow at a disadvantage to men, when in fact women in developed countries are arguably the most privilleged to exist in the grand history of Homo Sapiens.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:12 AM
2

Incel originally meant anyone-man, woman or anything in between-who can't get sex even if their life depended on it. Now it is just a trigger word used by insecure people to belittle others with different opinions. Just don't care. Anyone who calls you an incel without context is a blithering idiot who doesn't deserve to be replied to.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:10 AM
1

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Bet if her boyfriends didn't cater to her sex addiction, she'd make a similar post on the toxic r/TwoXChromosomes about how she is "sick of men being selfish and lazy in bed".
/r/MensRights01/02/22 07:29 AM
6

It's just a shaming tactic used to force men to become slaves.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 03:39 PM
5

Ok then, according to your fucked up logic, that makes a woman a little bitch if she aborts her unborn child for non-medical reasons...killing a child is worse than depraving him/her from money.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 10:48 AM
7

And the centre.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 07:26 AM
17

"You aren't a man". Ah, yes, the shaming and bullying tactic used since antiquity ad naseum to make men do what you want. Seriously guys, stop caring, and just answer, "ok, yeah, I'm not a 'man', so what?". Stop being insecure about your masculinity, and just don't care what they label you.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 07:24 AM
5

It clearly is not because of the strength difference. If a 6'5 muscle beast beat down a 5'3 skinny guy, people wouldn't care much. If an average guy beat down on an average woman, people would care a lot. I don't understand but there's a strange weak spot people have for women, irrespective of how strong or weak they are, and a particular hard spot for men, beat him bad no matter how big or small he is!!
/r/MensRights27/01/22 05:58 AM
1

The fact that society considers an average man hitting an average woman as (rightfully) bad, but doesn't consider a 6'5 hunk beating down on a 5'3 guy that bad makes me wonder if it really is about the strength difference...hmmm.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 05:56 AM
0

Well technically it's not pedophilia to be attracted to and have sex with a 14, 15, 16 year olds. They're not prepubescent anymore, so that term "pedophile" only applies to usually 12 and under.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:48 AM
6

It's simple really. Men empathize with men, because all of us deal with the shit that is being a man in today's convoluted and confused world. Women don't see men as people worthy of love, respect and admiration because they've been fed by the feminist propaganda that men are "all rapists" to be killed and quartered.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:12 AM
55

Men never were people. Men were always tools. In the past, men were cannon fodder in the world wars, slaves and eunuchs to empires, now men are underpaid workers such as sewer cleaners, truck drivers etc.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 07:40 AM
4

They only see men as "perverts" if they find them unattractive. If you're an attractive guy, the chances of anyone calling you a pervert are very low. You're basically given a free license by society.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 08:02 AM
1

Yeah that's a valid explanation, but ofc it doesn't align with the feminist propaganda...
/r/MensRights14/01/22 04:33 AM
1

I'm not making assertive claims that polyamory (NOT polygamy, that's a different thing) is the natural state of everyone. It's just that a significant amount of people have natural tendencies to be polyamorous, especially men. People exist on spectrums, and in my experience most people are somewhere in the middle or slightly towards polyamory (having multiple partner's).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 04:29 AM
1

OP, can you provide a link to this post that you have took a screenshot of? Would be nice to get context.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 07:08 PM
1

So are you suggesting humans are monogamous? Then how do you explain sexual boredom in marriages? Then how do you explain the common fetish people have for threesomes? Then how do you explain the phenomenon of cheating? I'm not actually suggesting that humans necessarily are polyamorous, not necessarily, but they most definitely are NOT monogamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 06:57 PM
1

I'm not asking you to trust me, I'm asking you to look around. Marriage rates are dropping in the developed world and divorce rates are have generally increased since the 70s. We aren't monogamous by any stretch of imagination, not the least "mating for life". The fact that most marriages become sexless over the years, even after adjusting for change in age and responsibilities, proves that we're not meant to "mate for life". Most people in long term monogamy have the temptation to cheat, althou…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 09:31 AM
1

Source? It's everywhere around you. Western society is the best example. As sexuality has been liberalised, we see best how the number of sexual partners has ballooned to over 7 on average for men and women. We're obviously not a monogamous species because we are inclined to have sex with as many people as is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 06:04 AM
1

Yes, absolutely. Most of us, men and women, are inherently dissatisfied with monogamous relationships over time. We get "bored" of our partners, that's indicative of our polyamorous nature (not polygamous).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:12 AM
1

Doesn't matter. Humans are, by nature, a polygynous species, which means harem-style in non-jargon. Most women find an extremely small number of men attractive, so they naturally pool around that small group such that 1 attractive guy has a harem of dozens of females. An example are the gorillas where a single silverback alpha male has a harem of dozens of females. Meanwhile the rest of the non-alpha males eat dust. That's how humans are if you remove religion and marriage culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 07:55 PM
0

Okay, sure, abusers do mask their true nature, but the problem is that these men are readily identifiable from not only their mannerism, behaviour and actions BUT ALSO THEIR APPEARANCE. It's common for abusers to be masculine looking and conventionally attractive. And even if that's not the case, it shouldn't be too hard to find out the true nature of such abusive men by just asking around their family and friends. Just go under cover and find out the man's true nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:18 PM
1

Thing is, guys who are typical abusers are readily identifiable. You can easily tell them apart based on their appearance, their mannerism, their actions etc. Why is it easy to notice and identify a "nice guy", the kind of simp that women detest, but it's hard to notice an abusive guy? Either you can identify both or none.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:44 PM
1

Yup at least men have the decency of bring honest about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:36 PM
1

Lol there's no personality involved to begin with. It's all based on looks. The same behaviour can get you laid or arrested depending on how attractive you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:34 PM
1

I mean it's not the same. When women date abusive guys, their abuse is readily visible from day 1 as these guys are clearly identifiable. On the other hand "divorce rape" women often decieve men by putting a charade of innocence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:33 PM
2

My man's speaking god's word right there! Women are never taught to be accountable since the day they're born, you're absolutely right man. As men, we are always taught to "man up" and be responsible for our own shit because we have to manage a family tommorow. Women? Oh, they're given excused because she's "just a girl!". Killed her newborn child? Oh! Uhmm, she probably was suffering from... uhmm, abuse! Abuse from her husband, that's it! Raped her child? Oh! Uhmm, she was depressed and couldn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:30 PM
1

Yup, rather than have the awareness of realising your own bad choices, many women instead choose to say "all men are dogs".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:22 PM
1

Yep. Humans, left to their own, without religion and societal conditioning, become a harem style species. An example of such a species is gorilla. One silverback male gorilla has an entire harem of dozens of female gorillas. That's the natural state of humanity, where one big alpha male has a harem of dozens of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 04:40 PM
5

Society treating incels like dogs and telling them to go f*ck themselves. Incels become toxic and vent the anger they've collected through years of mistreatment Society: Pikachu face
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:30 PM
4

Women are humbled in the presence of gay men. Gay men are the ONLY category of men not affected or influenced by women, so they're naturally a bit apprehensive of y'all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 03:27 PM
3

Yup exactly. I have an interesting theory regarding why women still "wait" for their "prince charmings" with whom they KNOW they have no chance. Ever seen a 5/10 girl obsess over some 9/10 guy she knows? She knows she has no chance with him but why is she still adamant on not dating her equal, but instead a much out of reach guy? I believe it's because humans are a harem species. On one extreme we have purely monogamous species' like the Pink Flemingo birds who mate for life with 1 partner. On t…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/22 05:15 PM
5

Basically the traditional definition (80-20) says that the bottom 80% of women seek the top 20% of men. This has now changed to 95-5. Essentially the bottom 95% of women chase the top 5% of all men, leaving the 95% rest to eat horseshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/22 03:12 PM
21

Bro you living in 2000s? It's now the 95-5 rule. Gone are the days.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/22 12:19 PM
19

And they call women the "compassionate/fare gender". Not that women are worse than men, it's just that women are just as fucked up as men are. Afterall we all are the same; greedy, selfish naked apes.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/22 12:18 PM
6

It's not a problem when the sufferers are men. To feminist's, any statistic that supports THEIR narrative, even if it is extremely shady like the "70 cents for 1 dollar" bullshit, they'll keep regurgitating it until the wider community accepts it as gospel's word.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 05:37 AM
2

I'm trying to show that you're an intellectually deficient toddler.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 12:43 PM
4

It's not about antisemitism dipshit. It's about protecting newborn babies from a life full of trauma and without genital autonomy. Circumcision has no significant medical benefits and it only depraves kids of full sexual autonomy.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:56 AM
3

Removal of the foreskin would be analogous to the complete removal of the clitoral hood, which is considered a Type 2 FGM as far as I know.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:54 AM
2

You don't remember but that doesn't mean others don't remember. Stop making everything about your meaningless life.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:53 AM
5

Let me hack your head into a pulp with a crowbar. Then you'll lose your memory and thus you'll not remember any trauma. How about that, dipshit?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:52 AM
4

Umm, sorry to break it to you but the majority of FGM is done by the nicking of the clitoral hood, the skin that covers the clitoris. The clitoral hood is analogous to the foreskin as both serve the same purpose. The removal of clitoris is an absolute minority of FGM. Therefore comparing FGM with male circumcision (MGM) is an absolutely correct thing. As for "cleanliness and hygiene", just shut the F up. That's like saying we should completely remove our nail beds because then we don't have to t…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:50 AM
1

Confidence and being a bad guy aren't the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 12:17 PM
3

Dude, I really don't understand woke people. On one hand they claim men and women are the same, and that any difference in physical strength, mental attitude, or behaviour is societal. On the other hand, they also claim that men and women are so different, that "safety procedures designed for men" are incompatible with female physiology. Ironic.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 04:34 PM
1

It's simple really. Women are scared of prostitution because it takes away the power and control they have had over men for thousands of years. Women know that men have a weakness for sex, so they have always used it to their advantage. For instance, women often deliberately act physically weak, like if carrying a heavy bag, so that they instigate the instincts of men, which basically allows her to enslave said man. The same way, women trap men in deadbedrooms, promising sex "one day" whilst con…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 03:41 PM
3

But this argument is false in today's society. Humans number over 8 billion, roughly 4 billion men and 4 billion women. There's no shortage of eggs and there's no shortage of sperm. We are going through overpopulation, so eggs are valued even less, atleast in theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 03:27 PM
5

And the country where it is defended is supposed to be the bastion of freedom, equality, and scientific progress? And this is what we see?
/r/MensRights12/12/21 05:40 AM
29

"iT is NoT tHe SaMe"- Circumcision apologists. Like really? You think it's okay to remove the most sensitive part from a newborn babies genitals without their consent? In what world is this morally acceptable? I was mutilated as a child, and I can tell you, I know what I'm missing. I'm relatively desensitized and numb there. Whenever someone says about Judaism, I say fuck you. I don't give a fuck what bronze age sheep herding cultists say. I'm sick of people defending Circumcision because it's "…
/r/MensRights12/12/21 05:02 AM
2

Yes absolutely. A girl can drug a guy, hop on, and ride him. That's rape for you. Rape doesn't have to be what you think it is. Rape is simply non-consential sex, and the victim can be anyone.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 01:16 PM
4

He's had enough of that shit. He don't give a fuck what you got between your legs. He straight to the point.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/21 06:21 AM
16

"Victim girl" Oh yeah, her gender automatically makes her a victim!
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:58 PM
106

Wait is that a typo? "Without her consent"? She's clearly forcing the poor chap as the sentence affirms, then why "her consent" and not "HIS consent"? Please, for the sake of my sanity, tell me it's a typo or else I'll lose faith in humanity.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:55 PM
12

"She then pressured her brother and started forcing him to have sex without her consent." Wait what? Is that a typo? Did the author meant "without his consent" or is the author trying hard to portray the girl as the victim?
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:54 PM
5

Ah yes, the "thy guilty cuz thy have a cock" rule. Whenever there is a sexual crime committed, no matter the gender of the perpetrator and the victim, that is what the court thinks first
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:52 PM
1

To be fair, the majority of men before 1950s were poor working class peasants. They didn't really have the time to be lustful, or act so. All of the sexual activity happened late at night, behind closed doors, not out of lust, but out of necessity as peasents wanted more kids to work. It was only after the post WW2 economic boom that most men could afford to have sex for pleasure and for the fun of it. That's why women were considered more lustful before 1950s because they were mostly at home an…
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:48 PM
7

I think this erroneous modern notion comes from Victorian era Britain, which basically institutionalised the "gentleman's conduct" and the "ladies first" fad. Before that women were rough and not so innocent in the eyes of society.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 05:43 PM
18

Only if you do it to them.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 06:10 AM
34

I never understood where this notion of women being compassionate comes from. Apparently it's quite a modern thought, as basically every religious text mentioned that women are not compassionate.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:58 AM
42

And if you tell them you don't want anything below a D cup, then you're the asshole.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:56 AM
1

I don't know, if society truly cared about men, then male suicide, male homelessness, male abuse would be major talking points, yet they're not. A stupid disproven "gender pay gap" gets more attention than all these. Look around yourself, male abuse and male rape is made fun of, with prison rape jokes and nuts kicking.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:40 AM
52

Apparently, in most places, you need the mother's permission to conduct a paternity test...so yeah, doesn't work.
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:29 PM
46

Exactly, expecting society to be sympathetic to male issues is like expecting to carve a massive rock by banging your head to it repeatedly; all you'll get is a broken head. Society never was and never will care, because male disposibility is rooted in innate human psychology. Kicking men in the nuts, the poster boy of slapstick "comedy", is somehow funny despite it being proven to be almost as painful as childbirth. 80% of suicides are men, but "gender pay gap" gets more attention; apparently 3…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 03:26 PM
7

Exactly. Feminists are really no different from most religions. They are so deluded in the "truth" of their movement, that any opposition must be a justifier for their existence, not that their movement has flaws. That doesn't even come to their mind. Feminists are some of the blindest groups of people I've ever come across, a group that is so convinced that they are right, that they never question their practices. The level of delusion and cognitive dissonance that feminists have is OFF THE CHA…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:50 PM
0

Troll her by laughing like Joker when she says "I am a feminist" with pride. Shatter that pride. The really funny thing about feminists is that whenever they are confronted and shown the shit other feminists do, such as block awareness events for male suicide and male homelessness, they just resort to "but but they're not true feminists!". Okay makes sense. But somehow the same rule does not apply to MRA's. There are toxic misogynistic MRA's out there, but somehow they're the real MRA's and the …
/r/MensRights01/12/21 12:40 PM
110

Dude, I saw that post earlier and cringed into oblivion. Who told them we want to hit women? What men say is "so can we hit women in self-defence?", the answer to which is an unequivocal yes. If we are equal then you as a woman do not have the right to not be hit in self-defense. You either are equal to us or not, you cannot demand the best of both worlds; either be equal to men in every respect, including the bad parts (such as having no immunity from physical fights) or we treat you special.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 04:06 PM
8

Men don't ask for help because men are mocked when they do. If a woman shows suicidal tendencies, the first thing a stranger would do is console her or feel sympathy. If a man shows suicidal tendencies, the first thing a stranger would do is to shame him and call him "selfish" for neglecting his family and their emotions. See the difference? A woman is prized for her existence, whereas a man is prized for his relations with others (ESPECIALLY his mother). A random person could feel sympathy for …
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:53 AM
7

Yep, girls in Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq are much less important than that white bastard spreading his crotch one degree north of acceptable figures, that white bloke ought to crush deez nuts. And then feminists ask us why we do not take them seriously......
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:44 AM
15

The logic is... "Western men have had all these advantages in the past... Therefore in order to make it even we need to have priority now" They do not realize that the average western man was a fucking peasant, a fucking serf or a fucking slave to a noble in the region. The average man had no rights and were effectively treated like shit. At least western women in the past were protected, western men, and for that matter every average man, was dragged to war, and put in the infantry line, just t…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:42 AM
1

If patriarchy that favors men over women was real, then 75% of the homeless would be women, then 80% of suicides would be men, then 93% of work deaths would be men, then 99% of war deaths would be men, then every dirty job (sewer worker, coal miner etc) would be done by women. Feminist logic is that an unaccounted 30 cents in earning means there is patriarchy, but apparently 75%, 80%, 93%, and 99% of the aforementioned statistics, not to mention many other, do not matter. Feminists are more blin…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:39 AM
1

It's simple really. Gender roles are worse for men because men are shamed when they don't abide by them as their masculinity is questioned. Women used to face similar pressures long ago, but now women are exempted (rightfully) from such gender roles.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:51 AM
3

Biologically speaking, yes men are disposable because biology doesn't consider societal contribution, all it cares about is reproduction; and of course from a reproductive POV men are disposable because one man can have hundreds of children, if not more. However, what is true, is that in the modern world we have billions of women, so women are no longer the limiting factor for population growth, so yes, in today's world men and women are equally disposable.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 05:19 PM
11

Yup, feminists want women to be unrestrained from their gender roles (a good thing) but dare a man behave anything "unmanly" and he's to be blasted with "are you a man?".
/r/MensRights27/11/21 05:15 PM
1

Ah I see, stereotypes and generalization for me, but not for thee, seems legit 👌
/r/MensRights27/11/21 05:08 PM
32

Yup, she can have dozens of preferences, all the way from physical, to mental, to behavioural but damn him if he has one preference and he's an asshole!
/r/MensRights25/11/21 02:06 PM
5

So she went to a formal grand opening of a retail company in......crop top and trousers? And she expects him, who works for the company, to be okay with it? Piss off.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 02:04 PM
1

I may not have a PhD in literacy but nowhere do I see health benefits on that list, and I will bet my left nut claiming neither do you. I am myself an intactivist, and MGM is one of the glaring gaps in men's rights globally. The fact that society has normalized the brutal mutilation of newborn boys is beyond horrific to me. There are no significant health benefits, you're right. If someone says circumcision has benefits, then so does circumanicure, a hypothetical practice wherein you remove the …
/r/MensRights22/11/21 03:33 PM
2

I know, but the point is that most guys enter MGTOW with the internal desire that society will notice and thus "rescue" the men, but alas ain't nobody give no fucks.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:31 PM
6

Men never mattered, dont matter now, and will never matter. No matter what anyone says, we know that the world is gynocentric. Men are mere replaceable cogs and gears in the grand machine that is society, ready to be replaced at a moment's notice. That's why I think MGTOW is stupid, nobody cares if you check out of society, there are a hundred guys waiting to replace you.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:53 AM
3

Yup exactly. Remember that news cutout, "1 in 4 homeless are women". Remember UN saying "19% of journalists killed are women". Men do not matter.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 04:48 AM
13

The thing is that male lawmakers vote to create laws against men! It's ironic. If only men had the same kind of in-group preference that women have for each other! I believe male lawmakers vote to create laws such as 'Yes means Yes' (which essentially shifted the burden of proof in a rape allegation to the accused!) because of the inherent intrasexual competition we men possess. Men don't want other men to succeed so when a male lawmaker has power, his impulses tell him to screw other men over!
/r/MensRights20/11/21 05:50 PM
16

"The privilege of being able to hug a friend without being called gay" in the comments. I'm gay and it used to be that if a man hugged another man he was either gay or after something... Pretty sure that's an America-only thing. From where I come, it's seen as okay for men to hug or even kiss each other on the cheek platonically. My culture is homophobic though, so much that we don't even have the concept that two men can be intimate, perhaps that's why men in Cairo are so open.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 05:48 PM
39

So there are actually many sources. I advise you to watch this video by none other than Mr. Shaym. It has all the sources from proper research and studies.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 01:56 PM
8

Yup, I have honestly given up on this movement and its goals because I have realized that men as a group will never have even 10% the value women have. Men have been (sadly) disposable trash to be yeeted when a better solution comes by. As such it is utterly pointless to talk about legit male issues such as 80% suicide rate. You know society does not give a fuck about men when the fact that 80% of suicides, 75% of homeless, 93% of work deaths are men, yet these facts get overshadowed t by the re…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 01:26 PM
4

Remember Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes, ah yes, female entrepreneurship! Remember that despite her company being extremely skeptical and unproven, how large firms, all the way from Wall Street to NYT lauded her as a genius? Just because she was a woman. Yeah, being a woman is sooooooo hard that society will blindly trust you without any evidence.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 01:22 PM
1

What I said is primarily true for major cities like LA, San Francisco, London etc. There is literally no lack of gay bars and gay sex parties (orgies) in these cities.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 06:02 AM
3

u/popzi, this is long, but do read this. I advise you for the sake of your own sanity, don't care. I will personally tell you that I've been involved in this sub and in this topic for a long time now, and I have honestly given up. I have come to the unfortunate conclusion that society and people, in general, will never give a fuck about you, me, or any average man. This doesn't come down to societal programming, instead, it boils down to biology. Men have always been and will always remain dispo…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 05:55 AM
2

Things won't change. This is the simple reality of being male. We are inherently disposable in the eyes of society. No society in history has given a flying fuck about men, and never will any society.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:26 AM
4

Progressive? More like regressive. Look at how human society crumbles in the next decade or two.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:25 AM
7

It really shocks me as to how much institutional power have feminists usurped in the greater world, all the way from kindergarten, to university, to national governments and even the United Nations. Though how much I hate feminism, I really really admire their ability to manipulate the masses. Only if we MRA's had the same ability! We know how to quote and slap on hard cold facts, but unfortunately the greater world is too intellectually dead to comprehend facts.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:24 AM
3

At this point, I think they should just replace "gender discrimination" with "female discrimination".
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:19 AM
5

I do feel that patriarchy is a thing, just not how feminists define it. Throughout history, since the dawn of humanity, there have always been a few elite men who control the entire society. Earlier we had tribal chiefs, then warlords, then kings, then statesmen, then prime ministers/presidents, and now billionaires like Jeff Bezos. These select 0.01%tile of men have always controlled the rest of us, men or women, as puppets for their own selfish gains.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:18 AM
4

When men report suicidal tendencies they are called "selfish" and a deadbeat who doesn't care about his family. When women report suicidal tendencies they are comforted and shown sympathy. There's a world of difference. Being a male inherently makes you disposable garbage in the eyes of society, ready to be sacrificed for "the greater good". If you're a male, you're just another cog in the ruthless machine that is society. Wanna pull out and go MGTOW? Tough luck, nobody gives half a shit, you'll…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:13 AM
3

Women don't make more attempts, it's just that they report more. It's just that men do not report failed suicide attempts. Think of it like this, when men attempt suicide and then fail/back off, they never report it to their family and friends because of the enormous stigma of male suicide. When men report suicidal tendencies, society scolds them for "being selfish" and that "you don't care about your parents and family", whereas when women report suicidal tendencies they receive sympathy and ho…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:11 AM
3

I would say that gay men have the easiest dating and hookup experience of all people. Gay men are men so they have high libidos and hookups are easy for them. I even saw chubby obese gay men with a body count of 1500+!
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:08 AM
46

Dude, I have become so desensitized to this shit that IDGAF anymore. It has become so normal to see society treat us, men, as disposable trash that I really say "wow" when someone treats me as a human with emotions rather than just trash to be yeeted across the fence.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 06:55 AM
3

Equality to WHAT? Do you think men have it better and easier than women?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:11 PM
2

Where to begin? The "gender pay gap" as you call it has been disproven multiple times (click on this link to educate yourself) by taking into account the fact that men work more hours than women, choose higher-paying careers, and take more financial risks, all because a man's economic condition is far more important than a woman's economic condition in the eyes of society. As for reproductive rights, go educate yourself. Women are allowed to control their parenthood (abortion) but men have no su…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:07 PM
3

Anti feminism is not misogyny. I support egalitarianism, not feminism.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 07:58 PM
2

Incel? Are you fucking kidding me? Just because I have a differing opinion? When feminists bitch about manspreading and mansplaining instead of advocating for young child brides in Yemen, you want us to take feminism seriously? Can you just fuck off from this subreddit and bark in your shitty feminist subs?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 07:58 PM
2

Dude, don't even care ever convincing a feminist. It's like headbutting a brick wall, all you'll lose is your own head. They have the mental capacity of an autistic toddler. She probably just brushed right part the facts you provided. Feminism and facts are polar opposites, all that matters is feelings and what fellow feminists say. Hard facts are an act of patriarchy to them. Believe me when I say this, no matter what statistic you throw at them, they'll always reframe it to fit their own agend…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 01:47 PM
3

Advocating for equality for women should NOT be achieved by putting down men and by blocking their fight for equality. That is what feminists are doing. I bet you didn't even read the comment and you just came back to regurgitate the same shit that feminists have crammed down your throat. You keep repeating the same shit again and again, why even are you wasting your time on this subreddit if you don't give a damn about men's issues, Im pretty sure you have dozens of echo chambers to regurgitate…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 01:44 PM
2

Oh lawd. I never asked feminists to give a shit about men. We men, are enough to fight our own battles. The problem is when you call yourself a movement of equality. A movement of equality will not paint men as being "privileged" and women as being "oppressed". Go figure.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 01:40 PM
3

You are basically contradicting yourself by stating what "feminism ought to be". There is no one feminism, rather it is more like a spectrum of diverging beliefs, wherein unfortunately a sizable chunk are radical and misandrist. You're glorifying feminism, and you're mistaking it with EGALITARIANISM, yes, those who truly fight for gender equality are called EGALITARIANS. The very fact that feminism has "fem" in it destroys your argument. Why does a movement about gender equality need to have fem…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 01:36 PM
9

Do you really think feminists are a hivemind of morally uplifted benevolent humans? Sure, I don't deny, there are many feminists who fight for equality (see The Factual Feminist on Youtube), but unfortunately, a large sizable portion of modern feminists are misandrist radicals who only know how to blame patriarchy and men for every fault in their lives. Be grateful that you're a woman, that society takes your problems seriously; we men have been fighting for decades to just gain basic rights, to…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 06:11 PM
9

ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS. What feminists do vs what they say is very very different.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 06:09 PM
8

If it really is about equality, why don't you salty feminists fight for male problems? Why do you assume being a male is easy, have you ever been one? Look up the statistics. Modern western women are arguably the most privileged humans to ever exist, you are equal to men (rightfully) in every way, in law and in practice, yet you still enjoy benevolent sexism (i.e. alimony, divorce advantage, custody advantages, "women first", and general women are wonderful effect). Life, for the average man, ha…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 06:07 PM
8

The aim of feminism? ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS. I have never in my life seen a single feminist who gives two shits about male problems. 80% of suicides are men, 75% of homeless are men, newborn boys are mutilated brutally, men make up 93% of work deaths and so on, why doesn't a feminist fight for men if it is about equality? What twisted contorted understanding of equality is this?
/r/MensRights12/11/21 05:59 PM
20

Exactly, I have yet to meet a feminist in person or online who can adequately explain why more egalitarianism (and equality) cause men and women to show more divergence rather than convergence. Take engineers for instance, over 85% of them are men in Sweden, how do you explain that?
/r/MensRights12/11/21 05:57 PM
1

It is. Period. No debate. Generalizing and hating on 50% of humanity is not normal. Tell her that this "joke" will not remain a joke. When you desensitize society to the point that they think "kill all men" is a "joke", then in no time will "kill all men" become a real thing. Think about Jews. Jew jokes and carcitures began as a joke in Europe in the late 19th and early 20th century, but we all know the end product of that. Tell her that history repeats. In no time will men be the new oppressed.…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 01:30 PM
16

Ah yes, Holocaust guilt hitting Europeans (and Americans) real hard. FGM has a position in Islam, but you never hear anyone defend FGM. It's only because western countries are too scared to be labelled "anti -Semitic" for protecting baby boys.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 07:41 AM
28

Sure, even if a woman prefers a cut look, why the fuck is she adamant that a baby boy be circumcised/mutilated? You pedophile or some shit? Another bullshit argument I've heard is that circumcision reduces HIV, the "benefit" of which is obviously insignificant compared to basic condom usage, and even if the "benefit" were significant, tell me, why circumcise a baby? He ain't gonna have sex until at least 13-14, and even then how often do you come across a 13-14 year old girl infected with HIV, a…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 07:39 AM
3

It's rather simple. Women are indoctrinated from childhood to feel that they "deserve nothing than the best", "slayyyyy kwqeen", and that they need to change for nobody. This instills a level of entitlement that blows our mind here at WAATGM. Add to this stuff like Disney, which regularly shows average girls (remember Cindrella?) getting their "prince charming".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 10:09 AM
14

The most mind blowing thing I have ever heard in my life is that "men care more about looks than women". Like seriously, anybody with basic understanding of evolutionary biology will tell you that it is the other way around. Men can afford to shag even a hideous deformed woman, well because he has nothing to lose (at least biologically speaking), whereas a woman has everything to lose if she shags a hideous dude (9 months of pain, an ugly child who she has to take care of etc). It mostly boils d…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 10:00 AM
5

"I no my worth", did you mean "I have no worth"?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/11/21 09:50 AM
3

Shouldn't have cut out their names. Such piece of shits need to be reprimanded, I don't care whether that is an internet mob or a real mob.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 06:16 AM
3

Yup, so long it is for women, you are a noble creature, but the moment you preach something for men, be it suicide mitigation, homeless shelters and DV shelters, you are the bad guy! I believe this is because feminists are aware that men have it bad, but they have to ignore/dismiss it all to maintain the false trope that women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 06:14 AM
1

There was this hilarious yet eye-awakening meme about a hypothetical practice called circumanicure. It uses the exact same flawed argument as is used for MGM, shows you the truth.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 06:11 AM
22

No lol, they don't want to elevate their position to men, they have already rightfully done that decades ago (in the west). Now they are pushing for female supremacy with STEM quotas and retention of benevolent patriarchy (such as alimony).
/r/MensRights08/11/21 07:37 AM
3

Asteroid kills humanity, women and children most affected.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:29 AM
14

I assume you're from America, the whole easy access to police has led to abuse of 911 services. People literally call on each other for the most trivial of things. I live outside America and people literally keep to their own bussiness.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:20 AM
12

This is exactly why MTF transition is so much common compared to FTM transition.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 06:53 PM
1

Do you mean "wasn't interested", maybe there's a typo in your post.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 06:51 PM
2

Nah, bro, I'm not generalizing women. This is evolutionary biology. Men who cry or show emotions are almost always automatically seen as weaker and less masculine, by everyone, including obviously, women. In my life, the people that have most told me to "man up" is guess what, my mother and my other female relatives, almost never men.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 08:29 AM
1

Most aren't so. It is very likely that the person that will love you the most in your life will be your mother.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 03:27 PM
12

It's simple really. Never show weakness or emotion in front of any woman, except your own mother, she's the only woman who won't think less of you just because you break a tear.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:59 AM
8

Give her the hard numbers. 80% of suicides are men. 75% of homeless are men. 93% of work deaths are men, Majoirity of war deaths are men. Men have 0 access to state welfare schemes Men have no domestic violence shelters Men have no access to homeless shelters Men have no reproductive rights (an adult woman can rape a 13-year-old, and then sue him for child support, yes this happened, read Hermessman vs Seyer) (in California and some other states, a woman can name ANY man as the child's father, a…
/r/MensRights03/11/21 05:56 AM
2

The child is 14, underage. This is statuatory RAPE, consent is invalid.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/21 08:36 PM
2

He is 14, underage, mentally and physically. This is RAPE of a minor.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/21 08:35 PM
4

You don't really need to be "prince charming", the proverbial man of dreams, as long as you're Chad. I legit saw posts on Instagram Reels that said and I quote "When a man is xyz, red flags become pink flags" where xyz is stuff like height, looks, etc..
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/10/21 08:32 AM
1

I legit do not understand why corporations try to do this. To appease whom? For whose browny points? Like seriously, the diversity pandering woke-ass millennials have no power to do anything, so why are corporations so sensitive to woke millenials' and their wishes?
/r/MensRights28/10/21 10:05 AM
2

Exactly. If you really are a strong independent woman capable of making unilateral desicions, then YOU should bear the brunt of your desicions by paying child support yourself. Women really call themselves "strong and independent" only when it suits them, but back right off when being "strong and independent" could jiopradise them.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:31 AM
0

I think abortion should be legal for both parents. Physical abortion for women and financial abortion for men; no questions asked. If women have the right to decline parenthood, then so do men, equal rights, isn't it?
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:29 AM
1

A lot of people misconstrue the issue to be about physical strength. Sure, that's part of the equation, as the average man is significantly stronger than the average woman, but the sad thing is that if you took a small bony guy (imagine Captain America before his transformation) and get an average women to beat him (and he'll probably lose), people will still find it funny. It is evidently not about strength. In the same way, if people witnessed a 6'5 Viking giant beat the living crap out of a 5…
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:27 AM
45

The gender pay gap is the largest public scam in recorded history. Millions, if not billions, of women have been duped into thinking that they earn "71 cents for 1 dollar". All that without taking into account the different careers men and women choose, the highest overtime men do, the less leaves men take etc
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:23 AM
12

and yet breast cancer recieves significantly higher funding. Male disposibility and male apathy at it's finest! Ah, so much male privillege, isn't it?
/r/MensRights26/10/21 02:21 AM
7

This is thanks to the "prince charming" trope that young girls are brainwashed with by Disney and Co. since the day they are born. Unrealistic expectations are borne from the idea that they "deserve nothing less than the best" even if the said girl looks like a partially mashed potato.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/10/21 08:14 AM
6

Haha not really. Sure, men have preferences, as any woman would have, but genuinely men are the beggars, not the choosers. Most women can afford to have preferences, merely because the supply of interested men is ENDLESS, but a man? Unless said man is a 10/10 model, he absolutely CANNOT afford to have even realistic standards, because if he does, well, he'll remain single! Thus most men learn to compromise, but most women never learn to compromise, because well, why would they! They have lines o…
/r/MensRights25/10/21 07:57 AM
8

Exactly! I never understood it. Whenever I ask a woman why she spends hours before heading to a party or an event, the response almost never has anything to do with men. Legit the overwhelming majority of men prefer a natural uncaked look, yet women still do it, and then SOMEHOW men are RESPONSIBLE for the beauty standards for women? Give me a break.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 07:52 AM
23

Millions of men working in sewers, gutters, dusty coal mines, radioactive uranium mines, electric grids, should also ask for a payback.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 06:56 AM
44

By that logic, look at most male serial killers. They too have a history of child abuse and negligence, does that mean we will absolve them of their crimes? The sad thing is that society has conditioned women to be unaccountable for their wrong. Did something wrong? MUST have a reason behind it. There was this news about a girl who chopped off his boyfriend's dick in his sleep, and a bunch of female presenters in a talkshow were laughing at it by suggesting that THE GUYS MUST HAVE DONE SOMETHING…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 07:32 PM
68

Exactly. A lot of people who claim that a man shouldn't hit a woman in self defense because "women are on average weaker" are the same people that would find it completely okay when a 250lb 6'5 muscle hunk would punch a 5'1 110lb skinny guy because "he asked for it". CLEARLY, it's not about the size/strength difference, because if that were the case then both cases would be equally bad. It's about something else I feel, and that infuriates me.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 10:50 AM
4

That's like saying black-on-black crime (which accounts for the majority of black murders) doesn't matter "because the perpetrator is the same race".
/r/MensRights14/10/21 10:46 AM
2

Men blow their brains off at a rate 3 times that of women! Cut the slack girls, and start blowing your heads off to reach suicide equality!
/r/MensRights13/10/21 04:48 PM
14

Feminists love inclusiveness, so long it exludes men. Inclusiveness of races, inclusiveness of ethnicities, inclusiveness of religions, inclusiveness of sexualities, BUT DARE YOU BE INCLUSIVE WITH BIOLOGICAL SEX, YOU MYSOGNISTIC PIG!
/r/MensRights11/10/21 01:46 PM
23

Apparently patriarchy ONLY applies in Maths, CS, Physics and Engineering, whilst other high paying careers in which women dominate (such as medicine) are not affected by patriarchy!
/r/MensRights10/10/21 03:57 PM
16

The west will die out in time since children and relationships are not compatible with a modern society. As sadistic it may sound, I would like this to happen. Why? Because I am from an eastern society, which is still relatively untouched by the western plague, and truth be said, if western society falls down a ditch, hey, at least it will be a stark warning for my and the rest of human civilization!
/r/MensRights10/10/21 01:05 PM
45

Women won't survive without men for a day. Be as woke and feminist as you want, but you can never deny that this world is run by men, not the presidents, not the ministers, but by minimum age sewage cleaners, loggers, electricians, plumbers, miners, construction workers, farmers, seaport dock workers. And now guess what, 99% of all of these hazardous occupations are done by MEN. The world would not work without men.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 01:02 PM
87

Nahh, they won't ever do that. Women want to be equal to men, but only in the good aspects. Women look at 100 facts about being a man, and then proceed to cherry-pick 5 of the good ones whilst COMPLETELY ignoring the 95 ills of being a man.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:58 PM
32

That's okay, but the article is trying hard to "prove" that equality is not enough, that females are somehow superior to males. It celebrates that women are the majority in academia, which makes 0 sense to me.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 09:59 AM
5

When they say they want to be "equal to men", what they actually want is all the good parts of being a male (such as being able to go outside at night) but they don't want the bad parts. In the holy words of Bill Burr, "Women cherry pick the benefits of being a man".
/r/MensRights09/10/21 06:10 AM
3

Lol true, this post is an example of false dichotomy. People don't exist in groups, everyone has their fair share of positive traits and negative traits. There is no " completey perfect" person nor a completely "imperfect" person.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 05:31 PM
-10

Although the people in these tweets have said it wrong, there is some truth to it. Female is the "default" biological sex, in that, to be male, you need to have SRY gene activation as well as activation of certain genes that block feminization, whereas you need no extra gene or condition to become female, which is thus the default path.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:26 PM
2

Exactly. Women nowadays want the ideal chivalrious gentleman, but won't be a mannered lady themselves. "Gender roles for thee but not for meee"- feminist, 2021.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:24 AM
4

The fact that she thought by default that men would look at her body tells me one thing about most women in general; that they think they are somehow special and so attractive that men can't help but stare at them. Ever noticed how a woman assumes you are ogling/staring at her simply if your eyes are in the direction of her (say you are looking at vase behind her). Most women have too high an opinion about their body, even if they are normal and average.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 05:12 PM
1

I am constantly reminded of the saying it’s easy to see equality as oppression when you are used to privilege. I couldn't join my dream college. You know why? Because I am a guy who couldn't afford it. Was I born a girl, I would have recieved many women-only scholarships and financial awards. Now who's the privilleged? Me, or the girl who got in because of her different genitalia?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 07:26 PM
3

I would actually argue that the less attractive/fit a person is, the more they seek out 10/10's. That is why you see some incels and neckbeards trying to hit with 10/10 women (AND then fail, and then whine about how women have too high standards, whilst ignoring women who they actually would have a chance with). The same reason is why you see morbidly obese 1/10 women whine about not getting Chad. Because in both cases, the ugly person knows that their genetic material is utter garbage, so they …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 07:05 PM
28

"It is okay to assume a man has intentions of raping you, better safe than sorry"- perfectly "okay" to say. "It is okay to assume a black person has intentions of robbing you, better safe than sorry"- perfectly not okay to say. See the double standards?
/r/MensRights26/09/21 12:25 PM
18

the mental gymnastics are absolutely shocking Exactly. Although not related to this post, I saw a feminist justifying that men account for 80% of suicide victims because quote "men use more lethal methods than women, because men have more access to firearms". Like what? You are basically completely sidelining the fact that (a) It is GODDAMN 80%! Access to lethal methods cannot explain this discrepancy (b) The fact that firearms are actually a minority in suicide methods globally, and given enoug…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 08:00 AM
-2

Please, for the sake of sanity, do not post RedPill stuff on this subreddit. It is meant to highlight male rights issues, not to whine about not being able to date. Reddit is not accepting of such content, and shit posts like this may get this sub banned like others. To the mods, please remove this shitpost.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 08:56 PM
4

Men's rights always talks about equality. I have yet to see an MRA call for or demand free stuff for men, or a bias towards men, yet we see female chauvinists demand free stuff for women constantly as well as a hatred and lack of empathy for men. I disagree with you on that because it is unfair to generalise entire groups. There exist "MRA's" such as Nathan Larson who actually hates on women and want to reduce their rights, such as their right to vote, and thus wants to make them "property". Sim…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:31 PM
1

"why not teach men not to rape or assault women" That is the same as saying that rather than lock our homes and secure our belongings, we should instead "teach burglers not to rob".
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:09 PM
3

This woman has made it clear she is looking for a husband AKA a provider. She implied her child's father is a deadbeat liar and cheater despite the fact he was good enough to impregnate her and remain pregnant to full term. Now, as a self-professed Catholic she is probably against abortion, but adoption and legal abandonment (Baby Moses laws anyone?) were still on the table; she chose to exercise neither.If you're not familiar with Bumble, the magnifying glass icon is the Looking For attribute w…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/21 01:32 PM
5

She doesnt understand that there is more to life than just fucking. She doesnt realize 30 years down the lane, after being a desperate cum slut for 50+ years, there will be no one for her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/21 01:27 PM
3

This is what happens when a society becomes oversexualised and the only thing that matters is putting your dick into a hole or vice verca for women, taking a dick into your hole. The person around that hole or that dick literally doesnt matter. Old age companionship doesnt matter. Only moaning and squirming in the current day matters. Love doesn't matter, only smashing matters.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/09/21 01:26 PM
4

Exactly, having a vagina doesn't make you more important to society. Sure, thousands of years ago, women were more valuable due to limited birthing ability, but today? We have 4+ billion women, no shortage of birthing ability, hence at least today, men=women.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 11:49 AM
3

Ah, good ol' male privellege, amirite?
/r/MensRights15/09/21 11:47 AM
1

Male disposibility at it's finest. Can't really blame the UN. This is human psychology. Men have always been the disposable, worthless, and discardable gender to society. 62% of civillian casualities don't really matter, why? They have a penis. 38% of civillian casualities absolutely matter, why? They have a vagina. Simple as it is.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 11:45 AM
9

To add to that, the expectations that come with being a man. You are expected to provide, you are expected to be physically strong, you are expected to have no emotions whatsover, you are expected to be a mannered "gentleman" whilst at the same time being aggressive when needed, you are expected to always have a stoic demeanour and the moment you break character people question your masculinity, you are expected to be faithful to your parents and your wife, you are expected to man up and never b…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 05:49 PM
10

"We look better", yeah because of the 5kg caking on your face.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 03:34 AM
2

Classical Apex Fallacy. Feminists, and perhaps women in general, see ONLY the top 0.1% of men as "real men", the rest are just trashbags not worthy of either love, care or statistical consideration!
/r/MensRights14/09/21 01:46 AM
2

male lions legit kill all the cubs of the previous male!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/21 07:34 AM
1

She wants a genuine guy, but she herself is a fuck girl....hmmmm.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/21 07:22 AM
3

This is what happens when you get subhuman SIMPS drooling in her Insta DM's and comments...Inflated ego and an inflated sense of self.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/21 07:12 AM
6

They literally think having a different organ between their legs makes them somehow special...legit 4 BILLION other people have the EXACT same organ, so why you feelin' special?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/21 07:08 AM
40

Beacuse of lack of accountability. Think of it like this, young girls are, on average, far far more pampered than young boys. Young boys are told to man up, take responsibilities, learn to take care of their family, learn to take care of their finances, not to cry, that they ain't good enough and so on. Young girls? They are told "You go gurlll!", "slayyy queeen!", and "You don't need to change for anyone!", not to mention simps. What does this do? This makes many girls entitled and unaccountabl…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/09/21 07:02 AM
6

There is no feminist and menimist. There is only egalitarian. If you support the rights of both, then you're an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 03:07 AM
15

The OP commented "Damn that's kinda fucked". Bet you if it was about a female then OP wouldn't say "kinda".
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:03 AM
16

We always have been, and will always remain second class citizens (at least until society wakes up). Feminists always like to point out how men "were always in power". LOL. Perfect example of APEX FALLACY, just because 0.01% of men had and have some power, they simply extrapolate and assume all men had and have power. Truth is, in the past, everyone was opressed by the elites (and the same is true today, although to a lesser extent). Think of it like this, on a pyramid of power, the top 0.01% ar…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:45 AM
45

Imagine if I told you that circumanicure is a beneficial operation for the complete removal of your baby's nails (including the nail bed) because it would be more hygenic and remove the need to trim your nails? That's exactly what psycho MGM supporters say
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:24 AM
1

Like seriously, for how much the feminists keep talking about male privillege and female opression, have you ever thought about why FTM is much much less common than MTF? If being male was really so easy and being female was really so hard, than why are a clear majority of trans people MTF?
/r/MensRights11/09/21 04:35 PM
1

But goddamn it, I am Indian too, and we have the POCSO act for protection of minor. He's 13, goddamit, how come POCSO didnt intervene?. How come he is repremanded when he is 13, and his sister is 16?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 03:48 PM
1

That's not my point. I'm saying that contrary to popular belief, rapists DO understand consent, but they simply don't give a fuck. "Teaching consent" will NOT somehow reduce rape instances.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:22 AM
48

They are deluded into thinking that rapists don't understand consent. They do understand it but they don't give a fuck sadly. Rapists by and large are psychopaths who derive power by subduing their rape victims, and contrary to popular belief, actually derive pleasure from a LACK OF CONSENT.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 10:31 AM
11

Given that you're being downvoted to oblivion, it's you whos the braindead moron. Just get of this subreddit if you don't agree, there's plenty of subs for you out there.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:58 AM
7

feminists" don't want supremacy over men in the world Yes, yes, yes, you're absolutely spot on right BUT that's in theory. In practice, we all know the truth here. Feminists blocking activism for male issues, feminists actively cancelling events that create awareness for male suicide (which btw is 80% of all suicides) and male genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:56 AM
4

You're retarded, fellow human. It's not about education for fucks sake, get out of your first world comfort zone, nobody gives a fuck about education in Afghanistan anymore. It's about survival; life or death. Here, by reserving entire aircrafts just for the women, you're basically handing death sentences to men, which is fucked up. Instead, the aircraft's should be filled indiscriminately, on a first come first serve basis (although children and families should get preferential treatment).
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:53 AM
2

Looking at your downvotes and the other person's upvotes, it seems that you're the idiot here.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:50 AM
4

Nobody has a problem with men being equal to women. That's not the point of this subreddit. The problem is when women are given preferential treatment over men for simply being women. I understand that the Taliban is harsh with women, but guess what, they're harsher with men, albeit in a different way. I'd personally rather be in a burka, covered and hidden, rather than be a man executed for "helping the government and the Afghan army". Why shall the men stay back? Is there life less valuable ju…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 05:50 AM
9

Yes, and also there is a big blame on western society which makes fun of male virgin's as "being failure's" (remember The 40 year old virgin?). I come from an eastern country and being virgin here is the norm for men until their mid 20s, and guess what, incelhood is almost unknown here.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:32 AM
1

Their standards are fucking impossible, they want respected confident rich extravagant supermodel practitioners of tantric sex mojo who simultaneously lack the self respect to expect anything in return from her and who are so spineless they put up with her every misbehaviour. While she herself is a 35 year old 300lb single mom of 3 with green hair... They call men "LVM" yet themselves are valueless.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:26 AM
1

The main problem is apex fallacy. People look at the top 0.1% of men, the likes of Bezos, Gates, Buffett, and Musk, from which they "decode" that "Oh! Men have it much easier!". The thing about men is that, yes, the top 0.1% of people are men, but so are the bottom cesspool of people. The sewage cleaner, the dumptruck driver, the electrician risking his life on the pole, the minimum wage worker are guess what, mostly men. Being a man is like tossing a coin, except that the coin is severely biase…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:17 AM
1

Yet interestingly, in most FGM's they barley snip the clitoral hood, which is similar to foreskin, but in MGM they remove the ENTIRE FORESKIN!
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:56 AM
4

You're right, at least in theory, but that's not how it really works. Just look at how desperate most guys are, women have literally created artificial scarcity, like think about it, there are almost an equal number of men and women, yet it doesn't feel like that. If an alien were to access our internet without seeing us on in person, the alien would assume that there are 100 men for every woman given the desperation and thirst men have.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:15 AM
4

The exact same people: Guys dominate engineering, maths, and physics. Conclusion? Patriarchy holds back women.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:36 PM
6

"Men are useless", says an entitled narcissistic piece of shit who relies on sewerworkers, truck drivers, electric grid workers, garbage cleaners, and farmers, most of whom are guess what, men. If these "useless" men stopped working for ONE day, her entitled ass would fall down to humble Earth faster than she emits shit on the Internet.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:33 PM
16

If she really thinks men "are useless" and have nothing to offer besides money, how about saying that most women have nothing to offer to men except sex? Then I am the bad guy, amirite?
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:30 PM
26

"The reason why a lot of men nowadays struggle in the dating world is because beyond money, many of them simply don't have anything to offer" is the same as saying "The reason why a lot of women nowadays struggle in the dating world is because beyond sex, many of them simply don't have anything to offer". Both are extremely sexist and objectifying, yet I am the bad guy if I say the latter sentence.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 07:29 PM
7

Notice how girls believe in "I'm good as I am, I don't need to change", whereas guys destroy their body in the gym and still think "I'll never be good enough"
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:21 AM
11

Doesn't matter, he's a male, and apparently men can't be victims. Remember that whole "Sexism (and racism) is power plus prejudice"? The woman has "no power" according to feminists, so yeah.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 06:12 PM
1

By law, one is innocent until proven guilty, so the burden of evidence falls on anyone who claims a crime happened, including rape. A rape accused is just like any accused, he/she is innocent until proven guilty, so he/she CAN countersue back.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:51 AM
1

The fact that men choose more violent ways is proof enough who is more depressed. More depression means the victim is more likely to be violent and use a method that guarantees death. Furthermore, the "women are 3x more likely" isn't true, because most male suicide attempts go unreported, due to the shame and taboo associated with male vulnerability and depression. Women are more supported when it comes to depression, whereas men are shamed for it, so many male suicide attempts go basically unac…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:41 AM
1

I think it's something to do with male intrasexual competition. Women see other women as "common victims" whereas men see other men as just another sexual competitor. That's exactly why laws, made by men, are biased against men. It is a subconscious manifestation of the male intrasexual competition, so a male law maker will be more harsh towards his own gender, because subconsciously he sees every other male as a competitor to his sexual success. That's exactly why male judges will give harsher …
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:24 AM
1

So you'd care about half an inch, something that is literally indistinguishable? And then you're the same kinds of girls who get triggered when we guys say we wouldn't date any girl above 150 pounds...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 06:28 PM
5

I think it's a natural thing, it's nothing got to do with GenZ. In the 50's and 60's, (relatively) feminine boy bands like the Beetles were all the rage with young teen girls. I personally have a theory that because teen girls aren't fully developed physically, they therefore are biologically wired to be wary of masculine men, who could be dangerous, whereas a frail K-Pop singer is physically less dangerous. As these girls grow, their body becomes capable of tolerating masculine guys, therefore …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 08:38 AM
1

so would a 5'11.5 guy be immediately disqualified even if he is the most amazing guy ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 08:35 AM
3

Totally agreed. But I must add that women, in my opinion, are affected more than men by social media's potrayal of the most attractive people on the planet. Of course a man IS affected by social media just as much as a woman is affected, but the difference is that most men KNOW that they will NEVER get a woman that is similar to the one they so desire, and therefore they go for any woman who shows interest. Women on the other hand know that they can go on Tinder and choose extremely attractive m…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/21 08:30 AM
4

So basically they want quota's for women in male-dominated professions such as in maths, physics, and engineering, but don't want quotas for men in female dominated fields? Hmm, equality go alley oop dunk.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 06:10 AM
2

Couldn't that be because he never saw a girl grow up before his daughter? That could easily give you unseen insights
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:52 AM
1

Ready for human extinction!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:34 PM
1

with an 8 inch dick. Fun fact, a woman's "8 inch" is actually a 6 incher. Girl inches do be bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:16 PM
2

I personally am of the idea that any of the partner who decides to keep the baby should have to carry the responsibilities for it. If you're a man in the future, and you wish to carry a baby against your sexual partner's wishes, you should get the baby onto an artificial womb or find a surrogate, and then be responsible for it. If you're a woman, and you wish to carry the baby against your sexual partner's wishes, you should be financially responsible for the baby. Honestly, it irks me that wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:13 PM
1

Hypergamy at its finest. No doubt in that. Of course male sexlesness would be higher, even if they represent a smaller number, after all, most men are repulsive to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/21 06:06 PM
12

Ah yes, male privellege, I really cherish my privilege thinking of the day I was permanently mutilated and depraved of a normal functioning genitalia, and if I complain, I'm the anti-semite!
/r/MensRights11/06/21 10:31 AM
1

It's not only bottling up of emotions. It's also how men are expected to be and act. A woman can fill in many niches in society, but men cannot, they must be the provider and masculine (strong etc) otherwise society considers them unmanly. Women have it way too easy in the West at least.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 09:05 PM
7

Wait for the feminists to come, and you'll see how this shuts down.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 05:54 AM
23

They will shut it down, it's inevitable. Modern 4th wave feminism doesn't want equality, it wants and promotes female supremacy, so any progress in men's issues is an instant failure for them.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 05:53 AM
18

Wait until feminism gets this subreddit banned...it's inevitable.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 05:49 AM
7

Lmao, in this situation, is there any difference between trash and men? Both have no protection from the hurricane, "men are trash" just became literal word.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:16 PM
1

Wow that's the most fucking retarded argument I've ever heard, go get some therapy. Women care about the mess? What the fuck you've been smoking. When someone's truly fucking depressed, they don't even give 0 fucks about the "mess that will be created". That's what true depression is.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:12 PM
1

Nope. Men are 4x more likely to attempt suicide (go to the gender disparity part) And even then, lol what the fuck is your point in saying that "men use more often violent methods that succeed more", have you wondered WHY? Because men are more depressed and feel more helpless in their depression, hence they are more willing to end it. Girls don't use violent methods because they are unsure. And if you say "men have access to guns", you're again wrong, because in armed nations like America, many …
/r/MensRights08/06/21 04:34 PM
1

Most men themselves aren't willing to talk about these topics Because society dismisses their plight and asks them to "man up", most often women themselves. I've heard countless confessions from guys who said that their girlfriends/wives lost interest in them as soon as they opened up to them and showed their emotions. Most women simply aren't attracted to "weak" and emotionally fragile men, so most of us feign strength and supress our feelings.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:40 AM
2

Again, I never said this behaviour is not toxic, it absolutely is. But it's not masculinity perse, but a form of intrasexual competition to get women. Women themselves force men to become toxic. Why do girls date the shitty asshole bully in highschool? Doesn't that set a precedent for men to act like a bully in hopes of getting some girls? Why do women friendzone the actually good nice guys? Doesn't that set a precedent for young guys to not act decent? Why do many girls ignore the guys that act…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:36 AM
2

As for your idea of "sexual expansion", I disagree because unlike women, who have actually fluid sexuality, men have rigid sexualities that prevent them from expanding. Just how gay men are disgusted by vaginas and have no room for expansion, the same way, most straight men are disgusted by other penis', and hence have no room for expansion. Furthermore, personally, I find anal sex disgusting, regardless of whether it is done with men or women, therefore gay sex wouldn't do much for me or most m…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:29 AM
1

Totally agree. Men are culturally bounded to women, often forcibly. Ever seen how a man is called gay or impotent for simply denying sex with a girl whereas the other way around is acceptable? Can't they fathom that men CAN sometimes NOT be in the mood? Have you ever seen virgin shaming? These poor men are considered less manly just because they haven't had an experience with a woman yet. Sexual slavery at its finest. It's tbh true that most women don't bring much to the table in a marraige or r…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:26 AM
1

Because given equal struggles, women should, in theory make the majority of suicide victims, because they have very little testosterone, a hormone that reduces cortisol, the stress hormone and therefore has an antidepressant effect. Since men make up over 80% of suicide victims, it is shocking how bad their circumstances must be (compared to women) to be able to overwhelm the anti-depressent properties of testosterone. I'm a guy, and I've been sad many times in life, but never close to depressio…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:18 AM
1

Toxic masculinity is a myth because it's not a product of true masculinity, but it's instigated by women. Naive young men tend to have toxic masculinity because they want to attract girls, so they act all chauvinistic and like an asshole.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:14 AM
1

That's the point. If you're more willing to fucking end it, you'll choose the most brutal method possible. The fact that men use brutal force more often means that men are depressed in a much more intense manner. Those that say that women don't have access to firearms, really? A lot of American households have some sort of family gun, so if a woman in said family wants to end it, she has open access to the gun(s).
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:12 AM
1

Imagine if you were a girl, you'd receive the support of your entire family, it is male privellege, right? Right?
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:09 AM
1

Exactly the fall of the nuclear family in the West is a huge factor. In my country, we live in close knit families where everyone cares about each other, so depression and suicide are less frequent. Western culture is way too individualistic, it's not good for the human mind. I really feel that an imminent collapse of the western society is nearing.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:08 AM
2

Not resistant, but you're supposed to be less likely to be depressed than women, given equal struggles. But that's not the case. The struggles of men are greater than women in the West today, therefore men make up the majority of suicide victims in the West. Contrast this with eastern countries where women are actually opressed, and the number's are much similar (though men still make the clear majority of suicide victims, they aren't 80% more like 60% of victims).
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:05 AM
2

Absolutely not. Firstly, testosterone is a much more potent anti-depressent than estrogen. Secondly, women actually don't have as much estrogen as would be necessary to have antidepressant properties, they top at 20ng/dl of estrogen, whereas men have at least 150ng/dl of testosterone, and healthy men have over 600ng/dl of testosterone. It is about hormones. Men are disproportionately the victims of suicide even though they aren't supposed to.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:01 AM
1

I would rather use the term "toxic intrasexual male competition", a bit long, but the best to describe what "toxic masculinity" is.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 05:43 AM
2

But in men its WAY too low to even have any impact.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 05:42 AM
2

Yes, and that's for a reason. Because men have a more strong will to die, because their suffering is more.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 05:42 AM
1

Did you realize it now? We are so expendable that even our parents think of us as somewhat expendable, potentially a source of income in later life (by paying them money). Ever been told to "protect your sister and mother" even if it costs you your life? Men are expected to sacrifice themselves for the "greater good".
/r/MensRights08/06/21 05:40 AM
2

Not really. It's because men are more committed to end it. Men face more challenges in life such as unrealistic dating/marraige expectations, hardships in jobs, disowning by parents for not fulfilling their desires, and having no social nets, and much more.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:18 PM
9

Toxic masculinity is a myth because toxic masculinity is not related to masculinity, rather it is almost always instigated by women as a form of intrasexual male competition. Some men are desperate for female attention, so they act toxic and cold to get some attention. Remember when women sent hundreds of love letters to Ted Bundy, and even now when young girls are obsessed with his documentary? Remember when the girls date the high school bully, but not the nice guy? Men feel compelled to act s…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:15 PM
4

Wonder why? Because men are more determined to just end it. Their misery is stronger than depressed women, who anyways get tons of support from parents and family, whereas the depressed lad gets emasculated by society for being depressed.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:12 PM
6

I think it's because men feel more hopeless about their situation than women. Women are used to getting a shoulder to cry, so they see suicide hotline members like you as a way to vent their sadness. Depressed men on the other hand are berated and laughed upon with such intensity by others, including parents and friends, that they feel that you, the suicide helpline person, would also laugh at them for not being a true man. We men are taught to "suck it up and be a man" so much, from the day we …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:11 PM
1

Exactly. I've seen it that mentally healthy men are more happy than mentally healthy women. Despite this fact, men are the majority of suicide victims.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:06 PM
2

Men are just far more successful at it. That alone proves that men are depressed with more intensity and their lives suck more, since they're willing to use brutal methods such as gunshot or stabbing. Women attempt more, but the fact that despite that 80% (yes 80%!) of the successful suicide's are men is mind-blowing. It just shows you men feel more hopeless and are committed to kill themselves.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:04 PM
2

a male child was a high-risk high-reward strategy. Exactly, I have a theory regarding this: You see from a biological point of view, the male form is an extreme deviation (produced due to the presence of the SRY gene and related transcription factors) from the default form of all mammals, which is female. A deviation by nature of probability is a high risk-high reward game. Not all fetuses are able to masculinise properly (since they might not have certain autosomal genes that allow masculinasat…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 06:00 PM
-5

They’re not effective for everyone but they’re a life saver for some. They are, but for some, they can worsen depression due to the reduction in physical masculinity that men would face after reduced T-levels. I was perhaps wrong, but OP should continue with his anti-depressent meds but also take some TRT to offset/cancel the negatives brought by antidepressants.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 05:52 PM
3

Me too brother. Plus point: You grow 3-5 inches in Mars due to low G, so you're sure to get a few chicks 😉.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:18 PM
8

Keep your crown upright king, you don't need any female validation to be valuable, even if you can't find one, don't make that a reason to feel "unworthy", keep finding, you'll eventually find your queen, someone who loves you for what you are, not what you could be.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:16 PM
9

I feel for you brother, all strength to you, times get hard, but you've got to express your emotions, don't EVER let them pent up, it's akin to a volcano supressing the lava, then exploding with force causing unforeseen destruction, that's how human emotions work. I have after hearing men learnt one thing, never hold back on emotions, and if you will, the best person to open up to is your mother but not your life partner, no matter how much she may love you she might (not all women, but better t…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:59 PM
22

However in men, low testosterone, which is on the rise, is a definite cause of depression in some. Men with extremely low testosterone, about 200ng/dL or lesser have still at least 5 times the testosterone of women with higher end testosterone, which usually tops at about 50ng/dL give or take 20. high testosterone levels in women can have a depressive effect. It's not testosterone that causes the depressive effect, it's the masculinasation that causes the depression. High T-levels in women mean …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:53 PM
31

Exactly. Women may go all out virtue signalling that they prefer "nice soft guys" for some social brownies, but evolutionary psychology dictates that women go for the "risk taking bad guys", the denial among women is very much real. In fact, I actually respect those women a lot more who openly say that they prefer bad guys than those women who keep fooling gullible omega simps into believing that nice guys are attractive.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:48 PM
24

Once again, acting as a thug isn't alpha, it's a beta male inferiority complex masquerading as a pseudo alpha driven by a need to prove that he's an alpha (which he's not). Real alpha males use their strength not to opress weaker people, but to fight oppressers (such as an "alpha" thug) and never "prove" that they are alpha's, because a lion doesn't need to prove its a lion.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:45 PM
48

Toxic masculinity isn't masculinity, it's a manifestation of sex-seeking behaviour that is instigated by women. Real masculinity is being a gentleman who only uses his strength defensively when needed, and takes care of those who are weaker. I still use the term because that has no other synonym, feel free to create a word for it if you like to.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 12:42 PM
82

No you don't get my point. Of course, I don't agree with feminists in that regard. They define toxic masculinity as being perpetrated by "patriarchy and male supremacy". I don't believe in that. Rather I believe that "toxic masculinity" is a product of toxic femininity. The shitty behaviour that some men posses is mostly because they want to get the girl's attention, not because they are psychopathic.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:52 AM
56

Another bullshit argument I hear is "why didn't he think about his parents and his family, imagine how sad they become?". Bullshit. Why shall he give a fuck about the family that abandoned him when he was at his lowest? Why shall he give any fucks for his parents that said "you're a man, men don't cry"? Rather than see why he killed himself, they instead blame him for not caring for his family. Even after death, the poor lad isn't left alone to rest in peace, instead he's berated for being selfi…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:48 AM
246

You know what's funny? Toxic masculinity does exist, but it's not reinforced by men, nope, it's women who reinforce it. Women preferring "bad boys" and sending them letters (remember Ted Bundy and Jeremey Meeks?) sends a subliminal message to young boys that inherently causes them to become violent and toxic in hopes of getting girls. It's women who ditch their boyfriends when they cry or break down after their mother passes away. It's women (such as r/FDS ones) that tell real men pay on their f…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 11:43 AM
4

Depends on who and where. I don't live in the West, marriages there are a total mess, the women have too much power in marriages.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 09:07 AM
2

This is feminism-fueled entitlement at its finest. They want all the benefits that feminism gives them but they ALSO want all the benefits that patriarchy gave them, such as not getting but. If we're really equal, then men should also have the ability to strike back.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 08:27 AM
2

definitely think they should fix that. Absolutely. Pads and tampons should be free to homeless women. bitch when things start becoming equal Precisely. Look at FDS. They want all the benefits of feminism, BUT also want the benefits of patriarchy, such as men paying for the bills, or women getting special scholarships, or women being considered less guilty of crimes than men who commit the same crime.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 06:37 AM
50

They say that it's harder to be a homeless woman. You sure about that? Just because a woman bleeds once a month, for less than 4-5 days, doesn't mean she has it harder, especially when tampons/pads aren't extremely expensive and public toilets are common. It's a matter of fact that people are way more generous to homeless women, and donate more often with more money. People somehow assume that homeless men would use the money to obtain drugs, but not the homeless woman. Who's finding it easier e…
/r/MensRights29/05/21 11:52 AM
6

Society teaches young girls from childhood to not be accountable to their wrong doings and to blame it on others or some random exentuating circumstance. I've been alive for 19 years and interacted with many women, many of whome did fucked up shit, but never said "ok I'm sorry, it's my fault". Most of them just blamed something or someone.
/r/MensRights28/05/21 07:05 AM
1

Lol the same could be said for women. The actual outcome would be that a woman could (and some women would) rampantly get pregnant and face no consequences-- she would have ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to exercise ANY CAUTION, EVER. Moreover, if you read carefully, I'm not entirely supporting that a man be able to financially abort. I'm merely suggesting that in cases where a couple HAD PRIOR AGREED TO NO CHILDREN, then a woman shouldn't be able to back off from that promise by not aborting. It should b…
/r/MensRights28/05/21 06:49 AM
2

The same can be applied to false rape accusations by women. "Not all women but enough to make men feel unsafe". Checkmate toxic feminists!
/r/MensRights26/05/21 04:20 PM
6

The fact that the laugh reaction is the second most used reaction is honestly despicable.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 09:27 AM
3

This reminded me of that "not all men" thing that feminists are against. They say that it is "better safe than to be sorry" when interacting with a random man. They're saying it's okay to "assume a man has nefarious rape intentions" even if there's no reason to believe that. I say the same is true for women. As men it is also our right to better be "safe than sorry" by assuming that every woman is a potential false rape accuser. But you know what? They'd call us mysogynistic for this. Ironic.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 07:09 AM
4

I've read about male contraceptives. Yes, the funding is less, but for a genuine reason. Male chemical contraceptives are extremely difficult to make compared to female contraceptives. A female chemical controceptive has to simply prevent the maturation of one egg, which is easy, but a male chemical contraceptive OTOH has to prevent the development of billions of spermatozoa, which is incredibly hard. Furthermore, this method of male contraceptive shouldn't decrease testosterone levels, which ag…
/r/MensRights24/05/21 06:58 AM
2

Last time I checked, women's health is one of the most researched and focused upon group in pharmaceutical companies. For instance, breast cancer receives much more funding than prostate cancer, despite both having comparable cases. Similarly, female contraceptives are much more researched and funded than male contraceptives. There are many more women specific drugs and medicine's than male specific.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:12 PM
2

Obviously they are. Sweden, the face of feminism in the western world, has an extremely gender neutral society, yet even then, certain fields such as non-biological STEM is dominated by men, whereas nursing etc is dominated by women! There are some biologically determined biases, such as boys being obsessed with tools, and women being obsessed with caring
/r/MensRights20/05/21 11:45 PM
14

Why do they want to force women into STEM? Women are already 60% of bachelor degrees, which means they have access to education, but they're simply choosing what they like. Why force it on them?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 07:26 AM
6

It's talking about women's mental health even though the majority of depressed and suicidal people are men, who account for 80% of suicide deaths. It's reached a point where nobody cares really. This is the modern incarnation of the times when men used to be used as cannon fodder in warfare. We'll always be disposable to society.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 07:23 AM
5

Its sexual discrimination being flaunted as a good thing It's a marketing strategy to get some woke points.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 07:20 AM
43

This is a big problem that a lot of women have nowadays. It's as if they're having a hangover from the chivalry days, and now, as feminism has come around, they're exploiting the benefits of feminism (equal pay, voting, equal opportunities etc), but ALSO want the benefits of chivalry. Like lady, you either take chivalry OR you take feminism, you can't cherry pick the "good" parts of both. If you're equal to a man, you shouldn't expect men to treat you better just because you have a different gen…
/r/MensRights19/05/21 10:03 AM
18

Classic "feminist" when given facts enters her little "safe space".
/r/MensRights19/05/21 07:46 AM
3

Women often talk about "institutionalised sexism against women'. I dare them to tell me ONE law that discriminates against them. As a man, I can tell many laws (many of whom I don't even remember!) that actively discriminate against men for simply being men: Men HAVE to sign up for selective service to get federal loans, get a driver's license, or get basic federal benefits, they effectively trade their lives in for basic rights. Male rape isn't legally recognized in most developed nations. A ma…
/r/MensRights19/05/21 07:43 AM
2

Considering the recent sad Palestinian massacre, the media is constantly saying, "including X women and Y children dead", whilst completely ignoring the number of men dead, as if they don't matter. The problem with this is that it normalises the murders of men, making them seem common or usual, and it also infantilises adult women.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 04:55 PM
5

just stay far away please. Assuming you live in the West, with that in mind, you'd find it hard to be in long term relationships. Western culture has sadly become too individualistic with no care for others and their needs. Women and men, both, to varying extents, have been brainwashed with the mentality, "I'm not your slave, do it yourself". Courtesy has become a thing of the past. Sadly this ideology is spreading fast globally, and that's how the entire world will be in 10-20 years.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 03:47 PM
1

Definitely. The problem isn't Western women, it's western culture, which promotes promiscuity for both genders. American men and women are increasingly viewing sex and relationships as something temporary, so it's hard to form lifelong love there, it's as if love has disappeared.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 03:40 PM
1

Yeah all those oblivious "hints" that girls give can be annoying. But as I said, it's better to be safe than sorry. Another thing one can do is to simply ask "hi" as you did rather than directly flirt. Careful look at her response, whether she's enthusiastic or not, and if she is, then flirt.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 07:14 PM
-7

So MGTOW is the way to go then! Fuck that shit how can you really know if she is “obviously interested”? Are you deaf, blind, or mute? If not, then see, hear, and respond, you'll know it. She's "obviously interested" when she clearly says it to you, or makes frequent eye contact etc. with you
/r/MensRights16/05/21 03:45 PM
10

It might be "bonkers" but thats what defines today's society. Unless you're a really attractive guy, like Hemsworth or something, it's better to assume that a girl is uninterested, unless she says or shows otherwise. If you still assume she's interested and make the first step, oh boy, get ready to get publicly humiliated by the archetypical "eww no" or worse yet, she bursts into hysterical laughter and then proceeds to name you a creep among her sorority groups, and you're basically done.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 02:37 PM
69

I've learnt one thing from all this fiasco that women talk about. I'd give one advice to y'all men. Always presume that the girl is uninterested in you or your advances unless she shows obvious interest. Saves a hell lot of self respect, and money, which could be wasted in court cases.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 09:32 AM
7

Apart from profit, it's clearly a matter of political correctness that has completely fucked up politics in America. They don't want to "offend Jews and Muslims" by banning infantile circumcision, lest they be called anti-Semitic and Islamophobic by the fragile trigger-sensitive snowflakes ❄️.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 10:58 AM
2

Donald Trump and Brett Kavanaugh are extremely wealthy and powerful men, who can get away with their shit using their money and power. But that's not the life of the average man. An average man has absolutely no such power, a mere accusation of rape without evidence in my country can destroy a man's live, there have been many examples. The best of which is Shawn Oakman who was in the NFL draft of 2016. He was supposedly so good that he was first-pick for the entire season, yet one accusation of …
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:17 PM
2

This is what male disposability looks like. We all men need to create and popularize #denormalizemaleviolence
/r/MensRights12/05/21 12:04 PM
14

Men cannot survive without women? Huh? Ever heard of college boys living in dormitories? They live perfectly fine without women. Rather ironically, the fucktards at FDS don't realize that they cannot survive without men. The electricity they are using to power up their phones, and banter on Reddit, is probably maintained by male electricians. The chair they keep their lard-filled ass on is also probably made by male carpenter's. The house they live in is most likely made by minimum wage male mas…
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:19 AM
3

Apex fallacy at its finest. Not every man is as wealthy and privelleged as Donald Trump and Brett Kavanaugh.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 06:41 PM
-7

It's simple. Father's set boundaries by enforcing them, usually by some kind of fear tactic. This creates discipline. Most mothers can't do it, because mother's are on average affectionate and find it hard to be brutal.
/r/MensRights08/05/21 09:44 AM
4

Furthermore, the fetus is NOT a part of the woman's body. It is a separate entity that has its own DNA and its own blood. The argument "her body, her choice" doesn't really add up since the fetus is separate from her, separated by the placenta. I really hope that in the future we have artificial wombs. The woman can terminate the pregnancy without killing the fetus, by transferring it to the artificial womb.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:32 AM
5

"Patriarchy" is a tool that man-haters disguised as "feminists" use to shut down any men's right talk because radical feminists want women to supersede men, and want "the future is female" to become true. This works because if someone believes that "patriarchy" exists, then by definition, male issues are non-existent. And that's exactly what radical feminism espouses.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 11:08 PM
7

I think we need DAWN
/r/MensRights02/05/21 08:03 AM
2

Hahaha lol, exactly. Women do tons of stuff better than us, but there is hardly anything they can do but we cant.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 12:06 AM
6

Which study? Oh boy would I love to use that study to shut the rabid twitter hoes who claim "all men are trash" and "women dont need men".
/r/MensRights01/05/21 11:57 PM
4

Not all parts of India are swept by western feminism. I come from a conservative part of India, where the internet has just recently caught on, therefore girls havent yet been exposed to FDS-like propaganda. But as time has shown, this will eventually reach here too.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 11:54 PM
9

I dont know if men can surive without women or not. But I definitely know that women- and other men- cannot survive without men. Men do the dirty and physically laborious work that most women would never do or be able to do such as sewage maintainers, loggers, coal mine workers, uranium mine workers, and much more. Society literally depends on these unprivelleged men yet gives absolutely no credit to them. If these men stopped working for one day, you'd see how the society would collapse like a …
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:16 AM
29

The state of the West depresses me. I'm from an Asian country, and thankfully hardcore man-hating western feminism hasn't reached here yet. Thankfully, boys are still valued back here. But sadly, as everything western, hardcore feminism will come here as well and cause a sharp rise in the number of depressed men.
/r/MensRights01/05/21 09:11 AM
7

The fact that the name starts with "fem" is proof enough that this movement isn't for equality. The same is true for MRA's who claim to stand for gender equality. The real supporters of gender equality are called "egalitarians". That's what I am.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:16 PM
6

Not really. Incels come in differenr colors, sizes, and beliefs. Some incels are violent mysoginists, some arent.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:12 PM
0

Horrifying? Lol fuck no. I'm like 18, and sex is the least of my ambitions, there's much more to do in the world than have sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/21 10:24 PM
2

But here's the deal. In earlier history, humanity was much less populous, and tribes lived in isolation in small pockets, hence it was important that women don't get killed, lest the tribe go extinct. Therefore it was reasonable that a woman be more valuable than a man. But right now the population of earth is a mighty 8 Billion and counting. We are overpopulated. We aren't going extinct anytime soon, save for a sudden asteroid. Therefore a man's life is equally as valuable as a woman's today. O…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 12:21 AM
2

More vulnerable my ass. Titanic sank in the middle of the North Atlantic Ocean in frigid freezing waters, with no land hundreds of miles away either side. How come a man has a higher chance of survival in frigid expansive deep water? Bullshit, any physical advantage a man has is negated by the powers of nature. It's simply male expendability, apparently having a cock makes you somehow less valuable.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 12:15 AM
4

Remember the time women in Britain formed an entire, "Order of White feathers", to shame men into being gassed with poisons and used as machine gun fodder? And after 20+ million WW1 male deaths, 60 million+ WW2, and countless millions of deaths in the wars of 20th century, Mrs. Hilary Clinton says and I quote, "Women are the primary victims of war". There's one thing to be used as expendable cannon fodder, but then to collectively ignore and disregard their sacrifices and their suffering? Fuck y…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 12:11 AM
2

Interestingly, WHO has an entire page dedicated to breast cancer, it's awareness, and it's statistics, but it has no page or information at all about prostate cancer. Hmm, nice male disposability there👍.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 12:06 AM
7

Apart from profit, it's all about appeasing Jews and Muslims. WHO and other medical organizations still condone circumcision for fear that they'd be called anti-Semitic and islamophobic. I'm a Muslim myself. Although my circumcision was not botched, I feel compared to my uncircumcised friend's, my sensation is considerably compormised. When I do the deed, I only feel significant yet momentary pleasure seconds before climax, and at most I can do it thrice a day. My uncircumcised friend's enjoy th…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 12:02 AM
7

Exactly, it's all about profits, circumcision is big bussiness in the US. American capatalim is a predatory fucked up mess. In America, money>health. Ever wondered why dirty heart-wrenching food is so dirt cheap but healthcare (such as bypass) is so inexorably expensive in America? Predatory capitalism. Make no mistake, I'm not a commie, but this kind of capitalism sees the population as a wet towel and the water in the towel as money; keep wrenching the people and squeeze every remaining cent. …
/r/MensRights26/04/21 11:58 PM
27

It's CNN, what do you ever expect? As everyone knows, it's a woman. Her life is more valuable than the lives of the combined thousands of men who've been executed in India since 1955. Classic case of male disposability. In 2019, in India, a girl, Priyanka Reddy, was gang raped and burned to death by a gang of rapist's. In the same time period, more than 50 men burned to death in a construction facility in India. Yet there was absolutely no support for the 50+ men who died and for their families,…
/r/MensRights26/04/21 06:23 PM
2

Damned if you do, damned if you don't 🥴.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 03:14 PM
2

I never said that women don't have a high sex drive. I said average. It's a biological fact that the average man has a higher libido due to more androgens than an average woman, who has less androgens.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 03:13 PM
3

It's nothing but a shaming tactic used to force people to bend down.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 11:34 PM
9

Exactly lol, and I feel standards for men are harsher than for women. There are short women in Hollywood, taller women, fat women, thin women and so on. But for men, it's very narrow
/r/MensRights22/04/21 05:13 PM
1

This comment just proves that looks>personality. She says she wants him (i.e his personality) without him (i.e his looks).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/21 03:40 PM
1

"Only God can judge me". Oh boy, would be judge you for the mess you've created here on Earth🤣.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/21 03:39 PM
1

They want to listen exactly what they want. I've seen that to be in a self-enclosed echo chamber is a desire many women share. They want no outside critique, they just want to hear, "you go gurrllll, you deserve the best of the best!".
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/21 03:36 PM
2

Exactly. I personally divide humanity into 3 eras. First came the hunter gatherer times. These times required fit, strong and powerful men to survive in. So women naturally flocked to these desirable men and formed cave harems. Then came agriculture and people resided in close knit groupings. Now people didn't hunt as much. Food was abundant. Hunting wasn't required, so women had no reason to flock to the strongest, and most powerful men. Instead women needed financial security so they went to a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/21 03:19 PM
1

This all has to be blamed upon Disney and other idiotic cartoons. Ever seen how most Disney movies convince girls that they "deserve a prince charming"? One who is all perfect, tall, handsome, and rich. Because of Disney and related cartoons, girls have grown up believing that they deserve nothing less than the best, even if they themselves are below average. That's where female entitlement has come from. From years of indoctrination that "you go girlllll, you deserve nothing but the best!!". I …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/21 03:13 PM
1

It's simple dude. Incels aren't a single cohesive cult or something. Incels are individuals being individual's. An incel at the very basic is anybody who doesn't recieve sexual intimacy even though they want it. Incels have no gender, no skin colour, no common beliefs, no set goal, and no common creed. Some incels are blue-pilled, some are red-pilled, and some have given up to the black pill and have accepted their fate of perpetual loneliness. Some incels are violent killers, yes. So are some C…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/04/21 03:08 PM
3

I mean that depends on how big your dick is as well. I have a body fat of about 18-22, and I can see it during having a piss, how fat do you need to be able to not see it?🤔
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:00 PM
10

Exactly, to be more attractive is my goal not because I wanna get girls, but because it would make me love myself more. I'd feel more confident in my skin.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:48 PM
7

Lmao fat women can just eat less and excercise more, and they'd be thin. But men are shamed for things they can't control.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:45 PM
29

I'm somewhat fat, 26.5 BMI, and as a guy, I'm constantly trying to loose it and come to shape. I want to change myself so that I'm more attractive. But fat girls don't want to change themselves, but they want society to change🤣🤣.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:43 PM
32

Agree with you. The problem is our modern media and television. For instance, google right now, "male body" or "female body". And see the unrealistic and nearly impossible bodies you see. This has clearly affected all of us. 30 years ago, women and men had no access to pictures of the top 1 percentile of opposite gender, so they had realistic standards. But nowadays, we all have access to the most beautiful people on earth, and our expectations have arisen to galactic levels. Because of this, wo…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:37 PM
57

Exactly. Fucking own it. Being called a "fatphobic sexist mysoginistic pig" is a matter of pride for me. I'm proud that I have gone against the social narrative that men shall have no standards.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:33 PM
2

See guys here's the deal. We as humans have surely advanced to high levels, but believe me when I say that we are subconsciously still hairless apes hanging from a Savanna tree ledge. Our insticts override any societal doctrine. That's why women are allowed to have standards, because speaking from a mating point of view, women are selectors and men are the selected. In our primitive sexuality, a man having standards is a choosing beggar. I know it sounds fucked up, and itis fucked up. The thing …
/r/MensRights22/04/21 02:29 PM
1

Great things you wrote, but easy easy brother, gotta use more full stops😂, it was hard reading until the end.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 09:46 AM
14

Lol the cops cannot believe a woman, "a pure hearted human", can produce CP. It's always the wretched goddamned pedophilic MAN who makes it. He's gonna shoot himself in his balls if he goes to the cops. They're too biased towards a certain gender.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 04:39 PM
2

Best reply would've been "what do you offer to me apart from that axe wound between your legs?".
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 11:07 AM
1

Being fair tbh, Syrian men are white as fuck. They're pretty much Caucasian/White.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 11:02 AM
2

Sheeeeeessshhh!!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:56 AM
3

Or if the ship sinks. Not only does the ship sink, but the collective feminism power💪💪 "you go gurlll" also sinks into the ocean.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:51 AM
2

Lol, I seriously sometimes envy my fellow gay brothers. Apart from occasional homophobia, they're living life. They're not entangled in female sollipsicm, and excessive demands. Getting some sex is ez for them, unlike us
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:47 AM
1

Virgin? Bitch, he just said he's in a relationship with your friend. Ffs the delusion. Apparently, any man who denies pussy (read: stinky slimy yeasty pussy) is a virgin🥴.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:43 AM
2

Oh fuckin god in the heaven, not again. How many times does one have to remind them that "incel" isn't a cult or a religion? It's simply a condition wherein somebody, of any gender, has no intimacy even though they want it. It's that simple. There are violent incels, happy incels, depressed incels, charismatic incels, genius incels, religious incels and so on.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:18 AM
2

7? Bruh. More like a 4. If you honestly go out there, the less attractive gals are usually more demanding and have higher requirements.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:14 AM
1

400lbs? Holy crap, I'm 5'8.5 ane 183lbs as a dude. Tf these cows be eating? At one point I've regularly eaten McDonald's and all of fast food shit, yet at my peak I was 205lbs. What tf do you need to eat to be 400lbs??
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:12 AM
1

I kinda think there's this 6666 cult among some women. 6 feet, 6 inches, 6 pack, and 6 figures.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:04 AM
2

Accept kqweens as they are, discriminate men for what they are.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:03 AM
3

Exactly. I'm 5'8, maybe 5'9, but with any normal sneakers I'm almost 5'10. So it is reasonable for any guy to say 2 inches above his true height. And anyways, 3 inches are almost nothing, just use mrinitialman.com, to compare heights.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/21 10:01 AM
7

Lmao true. I do support feminism, it's first and second wave, both better called in its truest term, egalitarianism. Western feminists living the easiest life on mother Earth have become used to these facilities. Having a water, food, and shelter are ubiquitous to them, so they don't expect in their echo chamber mind that anyone in the world doesn't have them. To them, "manspreading and mansplaining" are apparently bigger problems than 12 year old girls being kidnapped, married off to ISIS soldi…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 01:30 PM
30

Oh hell yes, she's opressed 😢 living in a western country, with all the benefits and working at one of the most powerful media companies, with a high salary. Meanwhile a depressed male sewage worker in Uganda, earning 1 dollar a week, is extremely privelleged! He has MALE PRIVELLEGE! He can go out at night but the western woman can't!! PRIVELLEGED MAN!
/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:04 AM
1

I wonder what they'll do with a trans woman🤔. She has no vagina, but is technically a female as per law. What rules apply to her?
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:29 AM
2

Honestly, men need to get a grip, and start to challenge the sexthority that women have established on us. Dealing with women is way too risky nowadays, better be with your hand.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:25 AM
3

Yes we are.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 03:12 PM
76

Nah man. One week would cause a societal collapse and millions would die by starvation and other stuff like having no sewage and electricity. One day would give them the taste but not the true suffering.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 06:44 AM
10

No no, he's got some point. He's basically saying that women can use men and their resources in return of a promise of sex (marraige basically). If men simply didn't care about sex suddenly, women would simply loose their stronghold on men. There's a subconscious truth to it. Many women feel threatened when a man doesn't simp. This is reflected in Reddit posts where men described the anger women felt when they were rejected.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 05:38 AM
3

What bugs me is that society considers "incels" as a monolithic hiveminded group of "mysoginistic men". They almost think of incels as a cult of a religion. But in reality "incel" is just a condition wherein you are celibate without wanting to be one. Different incels have different viewpoints. There are some incels who are literal simps, who worship women like godesses. Then there are the ones who LDAR, who simply don't give a damn. Lastly, there are the violent and crazy ones, which actually a…
/r/MensRights12/04/21 05:34 AM
99

That's the point. One day. That would be enough to send the message and bring some senses to entitled people.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 05:26 AM
43

But it is still from a woman's perceptive. Notice how the narrative is how women aren't conscripted, but men are? It's not about it being unfair that men are forcing told to sacrifice their lives for "the motherland". It conveniently ignores how male lives have been equated to nothing historically.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:22 AM
1

Agree with everything, but just genuinely curious, where did you learn that opposing circumcision/MGM is mysoginistic and/or against mother's choice? I couldn't find a source, could you give me it?
/r/MensRights07/04/21 11:15 AM
5

Exactly. Feminists and a lot of "equality" paraders only apply "Her body, her choice" when it comes to female problems like abortion. But they don't give a damn fuck about infant boys who get cock-snapped, as I like to call it, without their prior consent. Add to that the fact that circumcision has a much greater impact on a man's body than a woman has by say not going to abort.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 12:08 PM
7

It's hillarious that WHO still recommends it. They say it reduces risk of penile cancer and/or HIV, but by how much? 67% of the world is uncircumcised, but as far I've heard it's not common to have penile cancer and HIV anyways. It's all about political correctness, believe me. The WHO HAS to recommend circumcision, lest the PC enforcing crybabies call them islamophobic and anti-semitic. Sometimes I really wonder why organizations are so scared of PC enforcing crybabies? What will they do to a w…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 07:59 AM
6

Classic male disposability. We as animals are bound by the inherently misandrist laws of nature which dictate the low worth of men.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 06:51 AM
1

I'd like to add a point. I've been a student in two schools over my school time, and in my earlier school all teachers were male (it was a segregated school). In my next school, most teachers were female. And I noticed that female teachers were much more compassionate and gave more individual attention than my male teachers earlier. I personally think that's because more women have an intrinsic nurturing attitude than men, so women ARE better suited to teaching, which is a job that tests your pa…
/r/MensRights03/04/21 12:22 PM
5

If feminism was truly about equality, it would lift both the genders UP, not just women. Feminists readily ignore male issues, such as our: 1.high suicide rate (80% of suicides are men) 2.high homelesness (70-75% of homeless are men, despite that there are many shelters for women, but not for men) 3.higher deaths from homicide no reproductive rights (a man HAS to pay child support EVEN if he was raped as a child, or if his sperm was stolen) forced selective service and drafting more work related…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 01:02 PM
1

I don't think that's true, haven't you seen prank videos, and they often mention that filming in public is legally permissible. At least in the US, in public property, you are allowed to FILM anyone at anytime without any informed consent, since it's public. As for private property, unless clearly stated that no filming (with a sign), you are allowed to film reasonably. I think your answer talks about conversations, specifically phone calls. The hidden camera is not used to film conversation's r…
/r/MensRights01/04/21 12:47 PM
2

No thats extreme. My solution is to not have sex needlessly (one night stands), and if you really want to have it, either marry or form a long term relation (better if live in) so that there is a mutual understanding and love.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 12:41 PM
1

It should be fine as long as it has one or more microphones, just like your phone has.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 12:40 PM
6

Really? It kind of shocks me. As per research, only 37% of the world is circumcised, yet look at porn for instance, almost 99% of commercially produced porn features a circumcised penis!
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:58 PM
6

To those that say that penile sensitity isn't reduced, let me give you an anecdote. So I have done a few studies on this topic in which I learnt from my Muslim male friends that they can at most orgasm 2-3 times a day, and they usually feel any physical enjoyment only seconds before climax. Yet, I have asked my non-muslim friends who obviously aren't circumcised. They've told me that they can easily orgasm more than 5-6 times a day, a number almost none of my Muslim friends have ever matched. Th…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:55 PM
8

You're wrong. "FGM" as it's called comes in many levels. Some tribes in Africa practice an extreme form by removing the entire clitoris, and by narrowing down the vaginal entry, causing extreme difficulty during sex. That's truly fucked up, I concur. BUT. There are other forms of "FGM", in which the clitoral hood, the analogus organ to the FORESKIN, is removed or nicked slightly. Removal of the clitoral hood, which is much more common and is practiced in Arab states, is equivalent to the male "c…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:50 PM
48

It all revolves around women. They apparently like it circumcised, hence men SHOULD be circumcised to satisfy kqweens.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:16 AM
117

Female circumcision is called female genital mutilation, yet male circumcision is just circumcision, not male genital mutilation. Clown world we live in.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:15 AM
2

Hidden pen cameras. Easily can have 16GB memory cards. You can run 240p on it, and a whole days footage (8 hrs outside) would be about 1 GB, which you can compress easily and store long term on a dedicated hard disk.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:13 AM
3

But it's still better to have something with you. And of practicality it's not an issue because 360p footage from a hidden pen cam is about 4MB per minute, so if you record on average 10 hours a day, by the end of the day it's about 2.4 GB, which can easily fit on an 8GB SanDisk Once you end the day, you can compress the 2.4GB to much less with KGB archiver or winrar, to perhaps by 70%, giving 0.72GB. Then you wipe the SanDisk after putting the file on a 1TB hardisk, which is cheap nowadays. So …
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:34 PM
4

I'd say all the time. Women know this. They know the leverage they have in court. And yes, most women won't do it. But like men, there are women who are fucked up, and you bet your ass they'll do it if they're desperate enough.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:29 PM
2

I can bet she'll get a hundred times less severe penalties than what a man would have got for sexually assaulting teenage step daughter.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:46 PM
108

Here's the deal, nobody's forcing you, you can grow and style your pubes like a vikings beard with a Mexican moustache, but then don't expect men to like it. You are NOT entitled to approval, most men won't like it, and that's their right to not like it. You cannot force people to like what you like.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:43 PM
1

I understand your point, but as a Muslim, I have a lot of moral dilemma's so to speak. In recent years, there's been a lot of research that has shown that homosexuality is something that occurs due to a difference in the brain, which is persistent since birth. Specifically speaking, a nucleus in the anterior hypothalamus of the brain, INAH 3 is as Wikipedia says: ...significantly larger in males than in females regardless of age[1] and larger in heterosexual males than in homosexual males and he…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:35 PM
2

Might seem a bit out of place, but I say you need to teach her to be class blind. This implies that classes of people- be it a race, a gender, or a religion- don't have necessarily anything in common. People are individual, with a unique set of ideas and beliefs. Essentially, teach her that just because men commit more homicide per capita doesn't men are violent. Teach her that just because the media predominantly reports "islamic" terrorism", doesn't mean that Muslims are evil. Teach her that j…
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:29 PM
64

Anybody with a shade of a brain knows that men mostly live dichotomously. In the social totem pole, men make up the top 1% of people, yes, more men are CEOs, high earners, influencers etc. But at the same time, the bottom rung of the societal totem pole is ALSO occupied by men, who work in shit-filled sewers, repair electric grids at risk of electrocution, work in dangerous underground mines, build buildings, clean the trash and so on. So being a man for the most part is dichotomous, you either …
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:20 PM
1

Really? Most Jews are remarkably identifiable on pure physical characteristics. Sure, there are outliers but most Jews are either semetic in origin or are askhenazi, both of which are distinct groups with certain physical characteristics.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:12 PM
1

Really? If that's true, I really appreciate that! And on that note, why doesn't Reddit ban them, like they rightfully banned so many mysoginistic subs like r/incels?
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:10 PM
1

Thank you man!! Appreciate it! I'm planning to write a book on Islam very soon! It's all about clearing the misunderstood part of Islam that have fueled islamophobia across the word!
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:08 PM
47

+1 privellege point and -1 privellege point makes 0, so he should be okay I guess.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 07:02 AM
153

Yo someone do us a favour and do a social experiment. Change the word "men" whenever it applies to "Jew". And see how much uproar it produces on r/againsthatesubreddits. It's ironic. Btw there's a subreddit, r/menkamph, for exactly this, and it's hillarious and depressing at the same time.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:47 AM
1

Hey listen. I'm a Muslim and I believe that a radical group, NOT Islamic, did it. Al-Qaeda is a politically motivated group, they use religion as a pretext to "justify" their crimes. Al-Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS and other extremist groups are politically driven. In fact there's a video of the motherfucker Bin-Laden discussing how the planes successfully killed 3000+.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:44 AM
1

Tbh, as a Muslim, me and most of my community, consider Al-Qaeda and Bin-Laden to be misguided deviants. They essentially are fighting a political war under the guise of "an islamic war". Take Taliban for instance. They want to take over Afghanistan NOT for Islam, which has already been there, but for their own political motives, and personal greed. Most Muslims in fact believe Bin-Laden will go to the cesspool of HELL, because in our faith, killing one innocent is tantamount to killing the enti…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:40 AM
1

I'd say I'm a logical Muslim, not a reformist. Muslims need logic. An example is homosexuality. Like in the Bible, Qur'an also describes the case of Sodom and Gomorrah, and hence explicitly preaches against homosexuality. However, on closer look, the case of Sodom and Gomorrah, seems to be case of "voluntary" homosexuality, as in the men abandoned their wives, causing a population struggle. But if you look at most gay men today, they are involuntarily gay. It's been proven by research that their…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:31 AM
1

I'm not exactly a reformist. I believe in every and each tenet of Islam, just the way a "terrorist" would. It's just that I, unlike a "terrorist", interpret it contextually NOT literally (as terrorists do) and that's because Quran is written in old Arabic (over 1400 years old) and the language has changed, as well as the fact that circumstances have changed. Let me give you an example. [9:5] But when the forbidden 4 months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize…
/r/MensRights26/03/21 06:25 AM
1

First of all, I'm not sexist, neither are the 5 other people who did. They just have common sense, that you don't seem to have. In fact, you're the fucking sexist here, you're denying a man access to his reproductive and financial right. A man never consent to a child if he finishes inside the girl, given that both wanted to do that, that's sexist on your part. And what do you mean by "she can change her desicion". Then by that fucked up logic, the guy can ALSO change his desicion to not be a "d…
/r/MensRights25/03/21 12:38 PM
1

"Uhhh by suing the woman for raping him." Uhmm, and how exactly? He can sue, definitely. But how does he PROVE? Don't you know that the law is biased towards women, and that the word of a woman, especially in such a case, takes precedence over the man's word? Women are "innocent until proven guilty". Men are "guilty until proven innocent". Sorry to break it to you, that's how the law deals with such cases. And even if that's somehow not the case, what EVIDENCE does the man have?
/r/MensRights25/03/21 12:31 PM
9

Oh boy! Since we live in times of equality, I'd be more than happy if the same school organises a formal apology from the girls for the false accusations, toxic gossips and the manipulation that a lot of women have used to destroy the lives of innocent men.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 12:19 PM
111

Oh boy, I'm a Muslim, and believe me there'd be riots if that was done. It might sound ironic, I'm a Muslim, yet on the American political scale, I lean slightly, if not entirely, Republican. It just doesn't make sense to me, if you are a minority in the US, why do the democrats and the liberals automatically treat you as opressed and victims? Take us Muslims for instance. I'd be honest in saying that homophobia, transphobia, and religious intolerance runs rife amongst Muslims, although mostly d…
/r/MensRights25/03/21 12:16 PM
3

And how does the man prove that he didn't willingly have sex with her, huh? Ever heard of, "A man is guilty until proven innocent"?. It's literally impossible for the man to prove that he didn't consent to any sex. For more information check Hermesmann v. Seyer, when "Colleen Hermesmann (the woman who raped a 13 year old boy) successfully argued that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the wom…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:43 AM
1

About the child, I want to clarify. I don't want a father to abandon the child, no. I want the law to legally prefer abortions whenever ANY parent (who are unmarried) wants an abortion for whatever reason. This would ensure an unwanted pregnancy doesn't come to term. I believe a man's financial autonomy, just like a woman's bodily autonomy, is superior to an unborn fetus, so it should be aborted if the father cannot support it.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:39 AM
1

To be honest, being homosexual in a western nation is better than being a heterosexual. You're free from child support, no chance of pregnancy, no consent conflict, and so much more.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:35 AM
1

Of course that seems interesting, but obviously human thirst won't go nowhere. People will still fuck around carelessly. The resulting children will suffer. I propose that the law should mandate for non-recognized relations that whenever ONE of the parents wants abortion, regardless of who the parent is, the abortion should be legally preferred because it saves 3 lives, the man's, the woman's, and the begotten child's who would be unwanted.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:34 AM
3

Exactly. In today's world, especially the western world, which preaches itself to be "the hub of gender equality", there's tremendous apathy to men's rights. Have you heard of the case Hermesmann v. Seyer? An adult woman in all her senses had statutory rape with a 13, yes, 13 year old boy, who of course couldn't give legal consent. Yet, the 13yo boy was forced to pay child support even when HE was a child himself! And he was the victim legally speaking! Do you see the apathy that society has tow…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:15 AM
1

The thing is I believe in "the greater good". Say if a man and a woman in freshman college willingly have a one night stand (so there's no intention to have a child) causing a pregnancy that the woman wants to continue even though the man wants to abort , she should get 3 legal options: Carry on with the pregnancy, and jeprodize the career of both the man and the woman, as well as make the life of the future child a living hell (since it was unwanted, and both parents might regret later on) Put …
/r/MensRights23/03/21 09:07 AM
2

Oh come on, "And his choice was splooging in a vagina". Didn't I mention earlier that both the man and the woman agreed not to have a fucking child? It is a breach of trust and morality if the girl later decides to carry on the pregnancy. That's wrong, she broke the promise and contract made earlier. And oh yes check the number of downvotes you have, 5 people downvoted your reply rn. That should give you enough clue as to how much BS you've been spitting out. You are basically saying the woman c…
/r/MensRights23/03/21 08:56 AM
6

Okay, now I'm sure you have some issues, you seem to really dwell in an echo chamber. Does all this stuff you've been saying still apply if a man is forced? Say he raped anyhow, and she extracts his semen and impregnates herself (btw this happened check Hermesmann v. Seyer) without his consent, is he still gonna pay child support? You are basically saying men have no rights to their finances, and that even if the couple decided prior that no children, the woman can CHANGE her desicion and choose…
/r/MensRights22/03/21 08:35 PM
7

"No it's on the man, he impregnated her." But if she never wanted to have a kid in the first place, just have an abortion instead!!! If the finances aren't enough, ABORT! Simple. If any partner wants abortion, it should be done regardless of what the other parent wants, because an unwanted child will never be truly loved by that parent who didn't want him/her.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:49 PM
8

You don't understand what I'm saying. I'm not saying that the father should abandon the child. But that if the father doesn't want to carry the pregnancy to term, but the mother wants to, she should terminate the pregnancy for the greater good. I'm saying that here, the father's financial autonomy is more important than the unborn fetus, not the child. If the father cannot support the child, the mother should abort the fetus, even if she wants the child. This all rests upon the assumption that n…
/r/MensRights22/03/21 07:18 PM
10

And why do women walk away from having sex with no responsibility? "No, the woman gets the only choice. It's her body, not his." Yep. Fine. Exactly that way: "No, the man gets the only choice. It's his money, not her. " If the woman can't take responsibility, the man shouldn't either. Why's this so hard for you to understand?
/r/MensRights22/03/21 06:59 PM
6

Oh come on, you still don't get my point? I'm just saying that a man is not liable to a woman's independent unilateral choice. "Life is not fair". Come on grow up. It isn't fair, yes, but if a man doesn't have options to withdraw child support, then abortion shouldn't be legal either. Equality means no gender is favoured legally, and clearly here there's zero equality, because a man is stuck on the desicions the woman makes. Also, if a woman knows that a man won't pay child support, she should r…
/r/MensRights22/03/21 06:01 PM
11

Exactly. I'm pro-choice for both men and women. It's morally wrong to expect a man to pay for 21 years for the desicion the woman makes independently. It makes me chuckle tbh, if women really are so independent, why do they even need men to pay for their desicions?
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:59 PM
7

Haha come on. An average college graduated woman can easily start off earning over 60k+ a year (assuming it's STEM and/or commerce) and I think it's enough to raise a child with a moderate lifestyle. If a woman is truly equal to man, I think she can afford to pay for her own desicions. If she unilaterally continues the pregnancy, then it's on her. Not on the man.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:55 PM
8

My argument is simple and consice. If a woman is independent enough to carry the fetus to birth without taking the approval of the father, then the father is NOT liable to pay the money. Why shall he pay? Does he not have the right to self determination? If a woman has the right to determine her future by abortion, so should a man have. If the fetus/child is secondary to the mothers bodily autonomy, then the fetus/child should also be secondary to the father's financial autonomy.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:51 PM
24

Exactly! I'm a big fan of Karen DeCrow! In fact she's the least Karen Karen I've ever seen😂. Her name is a misnomer.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:39 PM
4

Tbh abortion for me is not a pleasant thought, I find abortion to be a moral dilemma. Does the mothers bodily autonomy trump the potential life of a unborn? That's up for debates. I'm personally against it in that I won't ever abort my baby, but if someone else is willing, hey, that's their choice. So if someone asked me whether to abort or not, I'd recommend them not to, but the desicions their. I find there to be two solutions to the abortion moral dilemma: There should be a mutual agreement b…
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:37 PM
3

Yes exactly! You got my point spot on! Although I really value the life of a fetus, so I personally am against abortion if it involved me, I've got no problem if anyone decides otherwise for themselves. But I only support abortion on the condition that the man has legal power to abort financial support.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:31 PM
6

And even if assuming it IS unfair to the child, is it fair for the man to suffer? Is it fair that the man suffers financial distress not to mention emotional distress because the woman didn't want to abort? Doesn't the child belong to BOTH the parents equally, since they are 50-50 genetically speaking? Then why does ONLY the mother have the choice, not the father? As I mentioned in the post, I've got no problems with the woman taking authority of her body, BUT only on the condition that the man …
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:28 PM
7

Lmao, are you sure what you're even talking about? By your twisted logic, or lack thereof, how's it fair for the mother to abort the child? Is that fair? You didn't even give poor chap a chance at life! By your logic, the chap was killed! That's fair??? Is it? What I espouse and support is state mandated child support, surely a western country like USA with trillions in revenue can afford to pay a 500 dollars a month for supporting single parent childrens sustainance. And also, in today's equal …
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:25 PM
7

The messed up thing is that a reputable company like The Independent has published the first article. It just shows society's apathy towards men.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 12:08 PM
1

And then they say, "men come from women"🤣. Bitch, did you forget that babies come from sperms, which come from men? Since men start a pregnancy, the logical answer to "Who came first; man or woman?" will be man.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 01:05 PM
6

Irony is that these women be sitting in houses made of bricks, which are made by sand obtained by men, made into bricks in kilns by men, used to make home BY MEN. The house they live in is made by men, the electricity they use is maintained by men who work their asses of with electrical grids. The food they eat comes from MALE FARMERS who work their asshole off to just feed these entitled "feminists". Fuck off
/r/MensRights01/12/20 05:54 PM
16

The school is run by feminists. There is one male teacher in the entire school...so i I go out there, I'll probably get suspended for daring to challenge the notion of "male privellege".
/r/MensRights30/11/20 06:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter