TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pantsinator9 Archive

View 7 posts and 40 comments by Pantsinator9 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Both can and do exist.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 06:55 PM
1

Wait, Social, right?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:53 PM
1

Damn, I’ve never seen this shit before but i’m in 10 this year so this is going to suck
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:47 PM
1

Bruh what grade?!
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:33 AM
1

Well, that sucks. But at least your parents gave you the choice!
/r/MensRights02/09/19 08:00 PM
1

Bruh this account got deleted
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:25 AM
1

Just curious, do you believe in evolution?
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:29 AM
6

Correct. I forgot to mention this, but thank you for reminding me. The bottle neck is not just for reproduction speed, but also for enough people for a diverse gene pool to avoid the effects of inbreeding.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:22 AM
7

Yes, the main force of nature is reproduction. Men can reproduce at a far higher rate, meaning less are required for species scale reproduction. So losing more men doesn’t effect population size very much, as the ones left can do their job. Losing a woman however is a problem. The rate of female reproduction is the population growth bottle neck. Losing them only makes it smaller. Men are the rest of the bottle, you need to remove a critical mass, meaning there are a-lot of men who naturally can …
/r/MensRights31/08/19 05:08 AM
1

You lucky bastard
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:39 PM
8

You lucky bastard
/r/MensRights30/08/19 03:04 PM
6

It’s in alberta, so yes.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:59 PM
5

My grammar nazi tendencies are flaring. (This kid's dumb is just one)
/r/MensRights03/08/19 04:36 AM
4

GRAMMAR NAZI ALERT: >!It's dyke.!<
/r/MensRights02/08/19 03:49 AM
0

Fair enough. We need to see the negative side of our movement to improve and make it more coherent.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 01:16 AM
5

FUCK THIS ARTICLE IN THE ASS WITH A RUBIKS CUBE
/r/MensRights30/07/19 01:13 AM
2

BURN IT (and post it here)
/r/MensRights14/07/19 04:18 AM
1

genuinely hilarious! But I'm thinking, what if a guy is in a relationship with a feminist, and she kind of indoctrinates him. He is introduced by someone who won't demonize him and portray him as a maniac for being male. they would guide him into certain beliefs and positive things about feminism, so they would join the movement. Doesn't even need to be a relationship, anyone close and knows him. But if they lack this, I think your points may pertain to a decently sized chunk of the male feminis…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:01 AM
2

Personally, none. I don't really affiliate with feminism, and don't talk to many people. But with such a large amount of members, I think it would be probable. And the feminist movement does seem to attract the more SJW types. So an sjw male feminist would likely act hateful and remorseful toward himself. And with so many people affiliated, there are likely a few.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 10:45 PM
1

What if they genuinely believe and support feminist views and are part of the movement pushing for change?
/r/MensRights09/07/19 10:38 PM
2

Yes, they could have linked to an article about how cricket is sexist. Here's the first result for "Cricket is sexist" https://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/NewsDetail/index/11/16872/Cricket-Sexist-and-Homophobic-Too
/r/MensRights04/07/19 03:24 AM
32

God. Damn. Adorable.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 06:59 PM
19

That b¡;@£, drove him into the ground. Absolutely raped in the ass with negative 628 Gallons of lube. That is messed up. She cheated on him, it was her own fault, but she got custody, 70% of his wages, eventually his house, and he even wasn’t put in jail when they said they would and he agreed. Just so they could keep him out in the world, ready to be milked for his money like an actual cash cow, and when the teat runs empty, they just let him die. Atrocious. And with no remorse either. Heinous.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 06:13 AM
1

Top notch mem. 420/69 would doge again *dabbbbbbbbb*
/r/MensRights09/06/19 04:06 AM
4

Bruh. Not cool. Edit: Saw your edit. Makes sense.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 04:03 AM
1

I wanted to get a feminist opinion. I honestly did because I wanted to see if what I said we could agree on. But they used censorship and now I cant even talk to the mods for 3 days and cannot participate in the discussion
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:33 PM
1

Here's the rule I "Breached" ​ Informativity rule: all ideological considerations must show actual understanding of the relevant feminist concepts. Comments consisting of exploratory/follow-up questions, in good faith, are an exception.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:08 PM
1

True, they do ban a lot, but this really ticked me off.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 04:02 PM
1

After cross posting this to r/feminism I was banned. Waiting for reason
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:16 PM
1

I dont think the child is a “person” until, like, birth. Until then they’re more like an organ of their mother
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:00 PM
1

I would say abortions should be available for as long as it is viable (Not after birth though). This is for overall cases in which abortion is considered and both parents “Pick a side”., and decisions are made. This model would be used in a court, if there was ever a case over abortion, this model could be used as a standard for ruling. Hopefully this covers your questions, if not, please do reply, I hate it when I don’t understand things.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:58 PM
3

Nowhere, I am in Canada, we do prime ministry 🇨🇦
/r/MensRights19/05/19 01:53 PM
1

Bruh.... No
/r/MensRights19/05/19 05:01 AM
2

Thanks, appreciate the ego boost
/r/MensRights19/05/19 05:00 AM
6

WHAT THE ABSOLUTE FUCK. NO. 10 DAYS!? ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS?! NO, SCREW THIS, I'M JUST DONE!
/r/MensRights19/05/19 02:34 AM
1

I was going to make a joke, but I’m going to post something serious here. If this were to happen, if were honest, there’d be practically no feminists. Now, we can see it as either: Women have higher value as they are required at a disproportionate value for reproduction and thus have far more power than the males, or men, outnumbering the females, have the capability to overpower (and honestly, rape) the females. Either could end in a matriarchy or a patriarchy, but I think with the gender imbal…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 03:10 PM
3

R.I.P this guy, soon the only deductions will be from rope and funeral payments
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:30 AM
2

Hate to argue, but they allow nations to interpret this differently. But considering the fact that it is this blatant, interpretations for avoiding an abusable law would be difficult to implement.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 02:36 AM
2

That would make more sense, and I wish that were the case, but the declaration does not state that.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 02:04 AM
1

I FRICKIN LOVE THE SANTA CLARITA DIET! Honestly, they could have done better by not calling it by the irl name and portraying it like that. They could have toned down the sexism a bit and upped the abuse part to build this negative character.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 05:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter