TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pretend-Storm4566 Archive

View 74 posts and 1,959 comments by Pretend-Storm4566 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
792

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights19/12/25 10:14 PM
763

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights27/12/25 05:59 AM
622

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights07/10/25 02:25 AM
485

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights17/03/26 03:10 AM
413

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:39 AM
317

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights21/04/26 03:45 AM
259

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights12/06/26 02:04 AM
241

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights01/08/26 05:13 AM
238

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights01/02/26 10:29 PM
234

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights20/06/26 02:34 AM
229

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights26/10/25 09:16 PM
229

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights02/01/26 09:58 PM
213

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights03/01/26 02:59 AM
206

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights04/06/26 06:05 PM
202

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights04/10/25 04:53 AM
190

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights03/02/26 07:50 PM
189

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights26/08/25 02:43 AM
177

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights20/12/25 03:21 AM
168

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights15/06/26 06:59 PM
166

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights21/10/25 03:53 AM
164

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:18 AM
160

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights16/08/25 03:55 AM
146

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights15/11/25 03:59 AM
138

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights08/12/25 02:48 AM
136

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:58 AM
134

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights20/06/26 03:13 AM
134

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights02/03/26 06:21 PM
130

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights13/08/26 04:18 AM
128

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights14/04/26 03:04 AM
126

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:49 PM
124

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights10/03/26 03:34 AM
116

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights26/07/26 01:59 AM
108

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights26/06/26 07:05 PM
108

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights23/07/26 03:13 AM
93

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights28/11/25 10:34 PM
90

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights14/07/26 02:12 AM
83

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights06/09/25 03:15 AM
82

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:00 AM
78

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights09/03/26 03:18 AM
76

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights21/07/26 01:48 AM
74

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights16/08/26 02:51 AM
68

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights04/05/26 01:24 AM
66

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights05/06/26 07:13 PM
66

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights15/08/26 09:49 PM
66

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights23/11/25 04:02 AM
65

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights14/07/26 02:52 AM
65

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights30/06/26 07:58 PM
60

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:55 AM
60

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights08/07/26 06:11 PM
59

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights13/01/26 08:46 PM
59

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights30/06/26 11:03 PM
59

HumourPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights19/01/26 04:21 AM
49

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights02/04/26 06:16 PM
48

Pretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights27/05/26 04:02 AM
47

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights05/03/26 09:01 PM
46

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:47 PM
39

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights27/07/26 07:22 PM
37

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights25/05/26 07:56 PM
34

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights10/08/26 09:13 PM
34

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights22/07/26 06:08 PM
32

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights24/07/26 08:57 PM
32

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights25/07/26 02:39 AM
27

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights24/12/25 07:32 PM
26

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights09/07/26 02:48 AM
25

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights19/04/26 09:57 PM
24

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights08/11/25 03:49 AM
20

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:01 AM
17

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights15/10/24 09:11 PM
13

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights06/03/26 08:58 PM
11

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights15/08/25 03:53 AM
5

Pretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights01/04/26 02:25 AM
3

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights14/06/26 03:06 AM
1

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights16/01/26 08:51 PM
0

GeneralPretend-Storm4566/r/MensRights10/02/26 04:09 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,959 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Yeah, definitely need more info on this one. I mean I just see a belly dancer. So what?
/r/MensRights17/08/26 02:24 AM
1

Brilliant comment.
/r/MensRights17/08/26 02:18 AM
1

I was sexually assaulted 4 times. Each one was in public. I have talked (messaged) with men who have been raped and many more men who have been sexually assaulted. The rapes were all in private. As far as I can tell the vast majority of sexual assaults were in public. One man told me about a girl grabbing his ass WHILE SHE WAS STANDING NEXT TO HER FATHER. I have never seen a public rape, but the closest by far to it was something I saw a group of girls do to a boy while I was in high school. To …
/r/MensRights17/08/26 02:14 AM
1

Right, so you think Trump is Establishment. That must be why his news coverage is 95% negative, because the media is COMPLETELY on his side. I'll bet the reason he was impeached twice and found guilty of a felony is because the Establishment backs him completely. I mean, it probably just looks like he is always being targeted. He has been so vilified he has, what? Faced 3, or was it 4 assassination attempts? Wait, I know, he's the President, that makes him the Establishment, right /s Well, there…
/r/MensRights17/08/26 12:54 AM
6

You have a point IF he knew about the kissing scenes BEFORE he took the job.
/r/MensRights16/08/26 09:42 PM
1

Sabrina made an anti-male song! Must be a day ending in y.
/r/MensRights16/08/26 09:25 PM
7

Sexual harassment at the least, possibly sexual assault?
/r/MensRights16/08/26 09:21 PM
2

Well, if there were no men your sister would not have been born. So there is that to back up her point.
/r/MensRights16/08/26 09:17 PM
0

I think the distinction is the same one that makes most political differences now. Most people are conformists, some think for themselves. If you're a conformists, you believe what authority tells you. These days authority tells us women are oppressed. If you're a conformist, then you believe that, and would be unlikely to listen to how men are treated unfairly. If you think for yourself, then you realize that the Establishment has political reasons for saying women are oppressed (they want to k…
/r/MensRights16/08/26 09:15 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/MensRights16/08/26 06:15 PM
2

I think this comment is brilliant. One little disagreement I have though. A lot of women who don't call themselves feminists talk and think like feminists. It is most women. I do agree thought that it is not all women, there are a minority of women who do see men as human beings.
/r/MensRights16/08/26 06:13 PM
0

Yeah. And some done by men are also sympathetic to men, like Murray is great. So, not saying there are not some men who have done studies sympathetic to men, just seems more are done by women.
/r/MensRights15/08/26 08:49 PM
-1

Sounds to me like you're the one misrepresenting here. The video says he dealt with her as part of his duties. I didn't here anything about her being "witness, victim or suspect in a crime they are investigating,". And she gave him her contact info and asked him to come see her. And she did not complain until she found out he was married. So basically he was found guilty because he did not tell her he was married. Her complaint was that she was vulnerable, and he took advantage. Well, she might …
/r/MensRights15/08/26 03:21 AM
23

Lord knows Trump is messing up in the Iran war, could cost the GOP the midterms. But the man does step up in fighting DEI biases, which helps men.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 09:24 PM
4

One of the articles said the Trump administration was responsible. I mean I hate to rain on your Trump Derangement Syndrome parade, but facts are facts.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 09:22 PM
-2

Lots of these studies are done by men. But most of those sympathetic to male victims seem to be done by women.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 09:11 PM
43

Ah, yes. The old "blah blah blah plus power" feminist crap. What's so funny is, these days it's women who do have the power.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 03:39 AM
0

I know, I know.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 03:37 AM
4

Yeah, I know all that. The usual, "it's just a matter of opinion blah blah blah". Except you can prove the accusation is false, can't you - by using DNA. Keep in mind while reading the below study, that DNA does not test consent. Thus the 25% figure does not include the cases where they did have sex, but there was consent. It only includes the cases where she lied and they did not even have sex. I tend to think if you did include both kinds of false allegations, that 25% would probably about dou…
/r/MensRights14/08/26 02:27 AM
2

Props to you for standing up to those women.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 01:53 AM
6

About 40 - 50% are false going by the studies I've seen.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 01:49 AM
0

They also said this was worth saying anyway. Perhaps less scolding...
/r/MensRights14/08/26 12:51 AM
0

Yes, previous comments said this.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 12:50 AM
9

By the way, about the researchers being female. I have not taken a tally or anything, but it seems like MOST of the time I come across a study highlighted male victimization, at least most of the authors are female. Could be because they don't have to worry about being called misogynists?
/r/MensRights13/08/26 06:29 PM
6

This just in - scientists find water in the ocean.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 06:26 PM
1

It certainly is not JUST an innate difference. Could be both taught and innate, but it certainly is not JUST innate. Women get sympathy, men get told to man up.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 05:30 PM
3

Can't help noticing that you have no evidence at all. So this is just your opinion. In fact, the study I quoted from says men who were forced into sex by women "reported having been recipients of unwanted sexual contact reported more depressive symptoms than did non-recipients. There were no differences on this measure for women."
/r/MensRights13/08/26 05:27 PM
2

Quoting albrecbef "Even If the exact story is likely fabricated, it mirrors reality suprisingly well."
/r/MensRights13/08/26 05:21 PM
9

Love the way you post men as having no feelings. Yeah, feelings, me? No way, I just missed out on some sex. The worst part of rejection, IS THE REJECTION.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 05:19 PM
3

Yes, I'm aware Trump has done more for men than just about any other US politician. But even he can't hold a candle to this guy. No American can come close to this guy. This guy is basically a pitbull for men.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 05:16 PM
17

Well said.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 04:48 AM
5

Yeah, I know, but he has a point. The lines here seem to be quite arbitrary.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 03:10 AM
12

This is done by the media a lot. I mean that's what MeToo was about, cancelling and condemning men without bothering with a trial. Having said that, that's the media, not the police. I can't say I'm aware of the police doing this?
/r/MensRights13/08/26 03:05 AM
-1

I just gave him this link Verifying McDowell and Kanin https://www.mediaradar.org/mcdowell_kanin_credible.php
/r/MensRights13/08/26 02:58 AM
0

You're a lying scumbag of course. But for the benefit of others reading this thread, this link should be of interest Verifying McDowell and Kanin https://www.mediaradar.org/mcdowell_kanin_credible.php
/r/MensRights13/08/26 02:57 AM
5

Of course. I'd be surprised if they didn't.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 02:48 AM
1

There would be no need for MRAs then.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 02:48 AM
28

Oh, I like this guy. How come the USA doesn't have any politicians like him? Love how uncomfortable he made the feminists too.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 07:37 PM
5

Welcome aboard dear friend :)
/r/MensRights12/08/26 07:22 PM
2

True, but sometimes the deal is way to raw.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 07:17 PM
26

When are you guys going to realize the luckiest men are the ones who don't date or marry women? Just live for yourself guys, relationships today offer you very little.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 02:17 AM
4

I heard the differences in jail sentences for the genders is SIX times as big as the difference between the races. Women attempt suicide more often? I heard that includes suicidal ideation - just thinking about suicide. Yeah, I'm thinking this guys is full of sh&t. The CDC says MORE men are victims of domestic violence. Even if you go by "serious" DV, women are victims just 20% more than men. Yeah, he is full of sh%t. I'm out.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 02:08 AM
3

Where does he get the stuff about the percentage of males in college is leveling off? It's been going down for decades!
/r/MensRights12/08/26 02:03 AM
8

Ok, the number of women who want to be firefighters, cops, soldiers is actually pretty small. Oh, they want to be ALLOWED to do it, but most women don't want to actually do that stuff.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 02:01 AM
20

You're kidnapping and enslaving people based on their gender, so why not? As for those saying everyone does it, yeah, humanity also used to burn people at the stake - so is that OK too?
/r/MensRights12/08/26 01:52 AM
2

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 09:47 PM
120

not the same??? LMAO
/r/MensRights11/08/26 09:46 PM
3

Know what is a great convincer? Read testimony of men who have been raped. Very moving. Men are more apt to open up about being raped by men than being raped by women, so you might have to sort through them to find ones with female rapists.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 09:45 PM
1

An oldie but the best. The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar. This one admittedly has a narrow focus, but it's great at what it does cover. When Women Sexually Abuse Men by Philip Cook & Tammy Hodo.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 08:08 PM
6

"We can be a little more creative and constructive than ranting over and over again about how female rapists get less jail time than male rapists." Yeah, I'm thinking maybe you are on crack. Sorry.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 08:04 PM
7

Sorry, but u/ApprehensiveMail8 has a point that you are off base on saying rape is less traumatic for men. The fact is, the research on this is mixed. The research that tests this by ASKING the victim about their trauma (which is most of it) does indeed show men report less trauma. BUT, and it's a big but, the research that measures symptoms of the victims as opposed to asking does NOT show this. In fact a few papers have showed men have more symptoms. Is this any surprise? Women are told being …
/r/MensRights11/08/26 08:02 PM
280

Oh, the poor dears. What's the matter, did some women get turned down? LMAO
/r/MensRights11/08/26 07:21 PM
1

Probably not.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 07:20 PM
6

Yup, truth is, there's nothing for men in modern relationships.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 03:51 AM
1

Yup, truth is, there's nothing for men in modern relationships.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 03:50 AM
2

All too true.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 03:49 AM
1

They're great. Of course, the Establishment targets them because they're MRAs. Some classify them as a scam organization, which is not true of course.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 03:01 AM
8

Great comment.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 06:47 PM
34

America abandoning its men gets me so f%&king angry. Reminds me of that parable, paraphrasing since not sure of the exact words. "The young man who is abandoned by his village will burn it to the ground, to feel its warmth." Society is asking, heck, it's begging for this.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 06:45 PM
-1

If maga believes everything he says, then sorry to disappoint you, but then I am not maga. Just to pick one example, I think the timing of the Iran war was the biggest political mistake Trump ever made, and possibly the dumbest political move in my lifetime by anyone. At this point Trump is actually helping the Democrats. Also, sorry to point this out, but you just contradicted yourself. You argued that Trump brainwashed them, then you said "His followers already hated the MSM and got most of th…
/r/MensRights10/08/26 06:36 PM
5

An oversexed, perverted cockroach.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 06:24 PM
-2

You know, it strikes me anyone could just as easily point out how those are examples of Trump Derangement Syndrome. I mean I realize that you have TDS yourself so I'm sure you disagree. One question, presently one third of Democrats identify as Socialists. Now I grant you, half of them don't know what Socialism is. Some even think it's just being in favor of things like Social Security, which is scary from a "how dumb are they?" perspective. Nevertheless, has it occurred to you that these people…
/r/MensRights10/08/26 06:23 PM
-1

Maybe not, but it shows I had already answered the question you just asked me. In other words, you responded to a comment you only read one sentence of.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 06:05 PM
13

Yes, we do.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 03:17 AM
4

Reading not your thing, huh? Maybe if I say it again. "Nobody could be brainwashed by Trump because 95% of his media coverage is against him. You can't be brainwashed into believing something if everyone tells you it's wrong, not how it works." I mean, for God's sake, if you cannot read more than one sentence, then why don't you just leave?
/r/MensRights10/08/26 03:10 AM
3

You misquoted me in an antagonizing way, then get all defensive. Yeah, man, whatever.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 02:59 AM
3

Wow, you can't read at all can you? OK, I defy you to show me how that is contained in these words "I find if I stick to the hard facts, I'm OK. You know, studies that say how often women rape men, stuff like that." If you cannot do that, then I get to call you dumbf&%k as your nick name. And, by the way dimwit, the early CDC reports suggest women rape men 80% as often as men rape women. Now 80% as often is a lot, but it is not "more than". CDC data saying women rape men 80% as often as men rape…
/r/MensRights10/08/26 02:20 AM
7

In the video, after she said she did not want to be in there, she did, in the video say the media should be in there. So I ma really sure she did.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:44 AM
3

I find if I stick to the hard facts, I'm OK. You know, studies that say how often women rape men, stuff like that.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:40 AM
3

I would say I'm a LITTLE selective, but not "very" selective in real life I still spit the facts about how many women rape and abuse men, but I won't say things like "women are more trouble than they are worth." I speak the truth in real life, but only up to a point, the point where I can back up what I say with hard facts.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:37 AM
18

Props my good friend, sorry you went through that.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:34 AM
3

Uh, you do know feminists are on the Left. Nobody could be brainwashed by Trump because 95% of his media coverage is against him. You can't be brainwashed into believing something if everyone tells you it's wrong, not how it works. u/Mistravels
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:32 AM
-2

A long time ago, some guy commented on the internet, that the difference between the Left and the Right, was that the Left was composed of the conformists, people who believed what the Establishment told them and obeyed. In my analogy here, your male feminists are the Left.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:28 AM
3

I just commented on what has happened in the 2 years since then.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:25 AM
8

So, this was almost 2 years ago. What has happened since? Here is what Google AI told me. NFL players have made incremental, strategic progress in moving media interviews out of the locker room, but they have not yet succeeded in changing the overarching league policy. [] While the official policy still mandates that locker rooms remain open to credentialed journalists, players are increasingly exploiting a powerful loophole: the right to take individual interviews outside the room. [1, 2] The L…
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:24 AM
3

I don't think any female sport allows media in there locker rooms, unless it's after they are all dressed. u/pargofan
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:15 AM
13

Yeah, she said she didn't want to be in there - then she argued in favor of her being in there. LMAO
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:13 AM
2

The Left manipulates lots of definitions. Like the "plus power" thing. Sexism or racism = blah blah PLUS POWER. They changed the definition of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:17 PM
1

I suggest contacting the International Council for Men and Boys about this. Google them.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:10 PM
2

Yeah, some women call each other bitch a lot. Heck, when I was in high school I got called bitch quite a few times, and I'm male. Usually only when I was being bitchy. LMAO
/r/MensRights09/08/26 09:08 PM
63

I can't tell you how happy I am about this. Men FINALLY standing up for their dignity. Geez, I hope they get it, and I hope the other sports follow suit. Who knows, maybe this might even lead to women not being allowed in men's public restrooms and mens locker-rooms outside of professional sports!! People are always asking for proof of mens rights advancing - this is a big example folks, if it happens. Thank you so much for a great post.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 08:40 PM
1

I went to the death penalty because he was cheering China executing billionaires, implying that we should execute billionaires too. So I just pointed out that he was being inconsistent, because his American Socialists are the "mass incarceration is racist" crowd. That makes him inconsistent on carceration, not me.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 08:25 PM
1

It was only towards the end I can't see the earlier comments, because the thread is so long it takes me to the next page. Time to end this convo anyway if its that hard to follow. If I click "See full discussion" it doesn't really help either.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 03:59 AM
1

"You were talking about a straight white male giga-victim class" If you say so. I can only see one comment back in this thread, and we've been talking for several days. At this point I can't recall what either have said in this thread.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 03:39 AM
1

""That will depend on the ballot box, who wins the culture war." No, it doesn't. Neither side gives a crap about this hypothetical straight white male giga-victim class." Not true at all. Republicans don't have to be MRAs to make that false. They only have to NOT stir up anti-male hate the way the Left does. Just not giving a damn is a big step up from the outright anti-male hate the Left gives us.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 01:29 AM
-1

Personally I don't hear that from men. Maybe you need to change the crowd you hang around with?
/r/MensRights09/08/26 01:25 AM
2

Yeah, and if I defined female you'd say I have to define those words too. Yes, every definition assumes you know how the words it uses are defined. This is till Leftist claptrap.
/r/MensRights09/08/26 01:23 AM
1

Love this comment. LMAO
/r/MensRights08/08/26 06:55 PM
1

So I went back to read your OP again. I read until I got to "we cannot even precisely define what is a man and a woman.", then I had to stop because I was laughing too hard. Apart from the fact that statement is Left wing propaganda, it is also the ultimate generalization. Watch this. I say a woman is an adult human female, and just like that I showed that your asshat generalization does not apply to me. Stop generalizing people dude.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 06:49 PM
1

Unfortunately I cannot see the comment I was replying to. As I recall, it was you saying the Right does not care about men. If that is correct, then I was replying to that comment, so don't tell me I was the one who bought this up when I was simply replying to what you said.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 06:43 PM
3

So drafting men by the millions for war while women sat home safe is NOT discrimination against men? Good to know. Glad you did not "take the knee" to them by the way, good job.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:57 AM
2

The enemy is the Establishment AKA the Left. It's Socialism doing its divide & conquer thing. In Russia it used class warfare. In the USA it's gender and race warfare.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:53 AM
-1

I agree there is more awareness of mens issues.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:47 AM
1

I think the things you point out about men having it worse today are the culture war. Now, I see the culture war as the last gasps of the Establishment trying to save itself, not a permanent change in gender status. To me, they are two separate things. You're conflating separate issues in my opinion.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:46 AM
-7

You know, if you don't hang around women socially, like I don't, then you don't have to listen to any of that :)
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:33 AM
1

Talking about not reading comments, obviously you failed to read when I said "Look, this is reddit, I have no intent on writing a treatise on how Socialism destroys." But you go right along with your treatises. Sure I could argue back that using AI communicates nothing at all, except that I used AI. China is looking to move into Communism? But they used to be Communist. So you're saying they went from Communism to Capitalism so they could go back to Communism? And you don't think that shows that…
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:28 AM
1

You must be new here. That has been beaten to death here. Yes, neither party really qualify as being for mens rights, but at least the right does not explicitly hate men like the Left does. Patriarchy, male privilege is from the Left.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 02:08 AM
1

That will depend on the ballot box, who wins the culture war. As long as the political Left, who hates males because they tend to vote right, controls the media and stays in power, then you are right. But if the Dems start to REGULARLY lose elections, then all bets are off. And given the way the Left is embracing Socialism, them losing the culture war is at least a possibility.
/r/MensRights07/08/26 04:22 AM
15

It's the Women are Wonderful Effect.
/r/MensRights07/08/26 02:48 AM
2

LMAO Yeah, bud Socialism is the way. Look, this is reddit, I have no intent on writing a treatise on how Socialism destroys. Well, OK, I'll give the Cliff Notes version of one very brief example. Mamdani's Communist grocery stores. The ones with prices 30% below retail. They will drive other stores out of business. Then they will run out of produce unless taxes are raised out of sight because Socialism always RUNS OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY. Of course, if you knew anything at all, you'd know th…
/r/MensRights07/08/26 02:38 AM
0

The reason it won't happen is the Left has commandeered morality, not because any one group is "oppressed".
/r/MensRights07/08/26 02:22 AM
2

That's because it is you missing our point.
/r/MensRights07/08/26 02:21 AM
0

The disadvantaged are NEVER perceived as the disadvantaged. The minute you are told one group is "oppressed", the one thing you can bet on is that group is NOT oppressed. The most oppressed group now is straight white guys, yet they are the one group the Establishment tells us is the most advantaged. This is BY DESIGN. It's an attempt to demonize the enemy.
/r/MensRights07/08/26 02:20 AM
3

I believe the correct response to this is "Man, that is f&%ked in the head."
/r/MensRights06/08/26 06:37 PM
6

"It's toxic conformity." And BINGO, we have a winner. The political Left is essentially either Socialists trying to burn everything down, or conformists trying to virtue signal.
/r/MensRights06/08/26 06:35 PM
1

Good point. We need the extremists, like the Left has. Well, OK, we don't want to go full retard like the Left did when they preach Socialism/Communism, but same idea.
/r/MensRights06/08/26 06:32 PM
6

"Women and black people didn't start out being perceived as an advantaged group. Thinking that you will be able to create a convincing victim narrative for men just seems naive to me." Man you are uninformed. How about the fact that women can rape men with impunity. Women can beat up men with impunity. They even get to kill men with shorter jail sentences. How about women can scream killallmen and nobody bats an eye. Speaking of eyes, how about you open yours, because they seem glued shut. u/Sub…
/r/MensRights06/08/26 06:29 PM
1

Hey, I'm not telling you not to try. If you want to, then have at it. Good luck.
/r/MensRights06/08/26 01:55 AM
1

Yup, lawyer time indeed.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 06:57 PM
21

This is actually a huge problem, even aside from sexual assault cases. Makes women think men owe them everything just because they have sex with us.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 06:55 PM
1

Hang in there buddy. Nothing lasts forever, and that includes sadness and depression.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 06:52 PM
4

That was tried. It was taken down of course.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 06:50 PM
1

Slander/libel are also feminist crimes. Examples are false allegations. Another example is the site Are We Dating the Same Guy.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 06:03 PM
2

Ok, thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 06:01 PM
7

Add slander/libel. All those false allegations, plus Are We Dating the Same Guy?
/r/MensRights05/08/26 02:59 AM
3

I agree this does not get the attention it deserves. Overall sexualization of male celebs, yeah, everybody knows that, but the deepfake stuff? I had not heard of it for male celebs. By the way, who made you delete that post?
/r/MensRights05/08/26 02:56 AM
15

It really is grotesque what society allows women to do to men.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 02:52 AM
1

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 02:47 AM
1

I don't know about these guys specifically, but I can say that, in the past, some youtubers tried to keep anonymous.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 02:47 AM
5

Yup, one third of porn suffers are female.
/r/MensRights04/08/26 09:18 PM
5

I hope whoever assaulted him went to prison.
/r/MensRights04/08/26 09:12 PM
10

Seconded. Most here know her already.
/r/MensRights04/08/26 09:07 PM
5

Just for the curious. A VTuber (virtual YouTuber) is an online entertainer who uses a digital, anime-style avatar powered by real-time motion tracking instead of showing their real face.
/r/MensRights04/08/26 09:04 PM
1

Sorry I confused you LMAO
/r/MensRights04/08/26 03:45 AM
3

See, when you asked omegaphallic to elaborate about projecting your sins onto your enemy, the comment you are responding to here is a great example. DivorceCoach is accusing you of doing exactly what feminists actually do. See how it makes you get defensive? It's a kind of gaslighting. u/omegaphallic
/r/MensRights04/08/26 02:36 AM
5

This could be a comedy skit.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 05:56 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 02:28 AM
1

There's no plausible way she could claim non-sexual assault was my point. Too many witnesses around. That's why I asked you how could she do that?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 10:06 PM
10

Man that's even worse than the OP made it sound. u/aasoro
/r/MensRights01/08/26 09:41 PM
1

What do you mean she would decide later? Please explain to me how she could possibly have claimed a non-sexual assault here. Do you think them bumping together could possibly pass as an assault?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 09:38 PM
1

You got to be simple to think I suggested that assault and sexual assault are the same thing. What I made plain is that she meant sexual assault, because nothing else makes sense given the situation. She, for whatever reason did not say the word "sexual", probably because she thought it was obvious that is what she meant. My post is not misleading at all because she meant sexual assault. And I already said why, but I can repeat for you, since you need everything said twice apparently. "If the as…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 09:36 PM
20

Wait, are you saying another woman raped him, so his gf murdered him for that?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:32 PM
5

You can post links here, just not links to other sub-reddits.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:30 PM
2

"she was caught falsely accusing a man of assault (not sexual assault)" You know, I wondered if anyone would say that ridiculous comment. OK, riddle me this batman? If the assault was not sexual assault, then what other kind of assault could it have been Einstein? Did it look like he was punching her in the face while they were standing in line? What kind of assault, other than sexual assault would leave her standing there, not physically hurt at all? Verbal assault? Tickling assault? Nope, even…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 05:17 PM
1

I didn't know Sharon Stone said that. Was she trying to be funny or something?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:26 AM
6

We win when men are treated like human beings, sensitive human beings.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 02:23 AM
10

Some truth to that. I think it's more a case of male conformism than cowardice though. If men simply stopped dating and marrying women, denying women access to our resources, things would change real fast. But most men are afraid to go their own way. Come to think of it, maybe that is a kind of cowardice too.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 08:53 PM
1

I don't hear cases like this committed by men. Give me these cases where men sexually assault women IN PUBLIC like this woman did. Usually if a man grabs a woman's breast as sexual assault, it's done in private. Heck, the closest I ever saw to a public rape was something a group of girls did to a boy in high school. It was done in a crowded hallway and nobody did anything. When males do stuff like that it's either in a small group of just his friends of just him and the girl. Usually it has to b…
/r/MensRights31/07/26 08:35 PM
8

Nice dodge of the argument. Who said anything about charging a false accuser in court? The point is, should you have to prove you are innocent? And the answer is NO. Assumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard. Now, if we were talking about talking the false accuser to court, then you would be correct.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 02:07 AM
1

But the differences are too big. And sometimes they shouldn't be different at all.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 01:13 AM
7

Yeah, victim blaming at its best.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 01:12 AM
39

Of course. Even the article called what she did "sexual assault".
/r/MensRights30/07/26 06:00 PM
11

So you got me interested in this. I'm aware that one third of porn surfers are women, but how about specifically women looking at nude men? So I asked Google AI. Here's what it said. Yes, scientific studies show that women experience physiological arousal when looking at nude men, though their psychological response often differs significantly from men's. Decades of sexology research reveal a fascinating disconnect between what women say turns them on and what their bodies actually do when prese…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 05:52 PM
6

Par for the course.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 05:45 PM
135

"She grabbed the male sailors by their crotches, stroked their arms, and made comments such as, 'I like my coffee how I like my men, big and strong,' while on a navy warship. She also smacked women sailors' bums and squeezed their breasts, saying, 'Do you like that baby girl?' A court martial earlier this year heard Dowsett took advantage of new female members of the ship and males who she thought would not report her. During those proceedings" If this was done by a male, it never would have gon…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 05:29 PM
1

Oh, I'm sure there's all kinds of data, but nothing can be as complete and reliable as the census.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 05:12 PM
7

Maybe because you used "boy" and "girl" instead of boyfriend, husband or man? Boy and girl means kids, and you think of kids as harmless. Plus a boy picking on a girl he likes is practically a stereotype.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:47 AM
5

Props to you.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 01:35 AM
1

What song? She was talking generally, not about any one song.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 01:12 AM
7

"The teacher has been accused of refusing to let the child use the washroom, following which the boy allegedly urinated in his clothes."
/r/MensRights29/07/26 06:19 PM
1

As I said in another post, I know someone who got banned for posting a link to their site. Supposedly because they are SPAM, which is a joke. Anyway, that's why I did not post the link in the OP, otherwise I would have.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 05:57 PM
15

Probably most of you have seen videos where an audience laughs when they hear how some wife cut off her husband's penis. I mean that, by itself, pretty much proves this.
/r/MensRights29/07/26 12:07 AM
10

OK, she admitted she used AI, so that's cool. But here's what I was going to say before I read that she admitted it. "It probably is true that she did this, but this begs a bigger question. How did they find this out? Because if the used one of those AI Detectors, than we have a big problem folks. Those detectors are not worth sh%t. They are so unreliable my college tells our faculty not to sue them for work submitted by students." Even though in her case these detectors were not used, I'd still…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 06:40 PM
1

I looked at his data, it's from Pew in 2021, but yeah, some is from like 2019. STEM data, the reliable kind, usually comes from the US Census, which is taken once every 10 years. Maybe it;s your mind that's been fed too much s%$t.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 06:31 PM
10

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2015). National hiring experiments reveal 2: 1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(17), 5360-5365. https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1418878112 u/ThatOneCloneTrooper
/r/MensRights28/07/26 06:09 PM
0

Look, you wanna be a Debbie Downer, go for it. People who are always tearing things down never build anything. I get their emails, and nothing I get from them resembles SPAM in any way. In fact, once or twice I've put up one of their emails as an OP in this sub. They're the ones who told me about that UN guy I posted about here in the last day or two.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 06:02 PM
2

I could only watch a few minutes of it.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:39 AM
2

One of the things that made Buffy the Vampire Slayer misandric, despite everyone thinking it was egalitarian.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:34 AM
12

Me too, no pun intended.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:31 AM
1

I say just avoid women socially, get a good job, make money, all of which you spend only on yourself.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:30 AM
15

And you rarely hear any women complaining on behalf of men.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:25 AM
28

Men have to stop that, and start complaining more.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:23 AM
44

FYI, actually women are a bit OVER represented in STEM occupations in the UK and the USA https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1krm6dc/the_truth_about_women_in_stem/
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:20 AM
1

You cannot talk about the whole globe at once, the situation varies too much from country to country. This is an English sub. The Middle East is not going to be well represented here. I talk about where I live. If you want to about the third feel free. But bringing up the third world to disagree with someone who is plainly talking about the West, and you implying you are disagreeing with him, is you derailing the conversation.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 10:02 PM
1

"Both genders suffer a lot more than the other, depending on the region." Fair point. The leader of that group is American. They are not thinking of Saudi Arabia, and neither was I. I'm all for women's liberation where it is needed. What percentage of people in this sub do you think are from countries like that? Yeah, there are some, but a small minority.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 09:42 PM
0

So why are you here? To troll? Everyone suffers, sure, but one gender is suffering a lot more than the other. That organization is not meant for someone like you.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 09:20 PM
0

Probably some truth ti that, in that it's mostly on online thing. I mean, wouldn't it have to be? It's an international organization. It's not like you can have an Elks' lodge that serves the entire globe. People in Canada are not going to go to the UK to share a pint in the pub now, are they? If you want to join, click on "About Us", and a pop up comes up asking you to join the wave for men and boys, and to stay in touch - so, yeah, it is there telling you to join.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 09:18 PM
10

You can find studies reporting men being discriminated against in jobs like nursing.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 07:09 PM
2

DuckDuckgo is good. Just don't use Google for anything like that.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 07:05 PM
5

International Council for Men and Boys I won't post their website here because some sites, erroneously think they are some kind of SPAM organization. In reality, they are not at all, but mens rights groups get treated like that. I know someone who got banned for copy/pasting their link. Besides, you can find them yourself with a Google search.
/r/MensRights27/07/26 07:01 PM
1

Yup, that is what the study said.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 09:29 PM
2

At least you get the point. Many here do not.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 05:38 PM
1

At least you get the point. Many here do not. u/crash-test-idiots u/OtterWithKids u/AbysmalDescent u/gundahir
/r/MensRights26/07/26 05:33 PM
2

Uh, no. Try reading this comment by Fit-Philosopher "The alignment team is meant to keep the company legally and politically safe by tuning to model to say things that are least risky today. Otherwise, if the model trained purely on data, it is less likely to have this much bias. Simply put, it trains the model towards current normative behaviors."
/r/MensRights26/07/26 05:28 PM
10

Yup. And given today's climate, what else would we expect?
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:32 AM
2

This study says it is also RLHF. Did you read the OP?
/r/MensRights26/07/26 02:25 AM
1

Oh for God's sake.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 01:40 AM
20

And whiteness is part of safety, why exactly?
/r/MensRights26/07/26 01:39 AM
13

That can be a trap though. Karen Straughan always stood firm in pointing out that women were not oppressed in the past, and she always got into trouble for that. I recommend not talking about the past too much. If pressed I say I don't know what the past was like because I was not alive back then. I prefer talking about what I know, the present and the last 60 years or so.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 01:36 AM
18

Very close to what I would say. "I believe in equality of the genders before the law, so, no, I do not believe in feminism."
/r/MensRights26/07/26 01:32 AM
-1

You know, come to think of it, if you can't understand it, I'll bet you're not the only one. I'll edit it.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:18 AM
-1

Try actually understanding the OP.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 03:16 AM
1

AI gave me the legal definition in the USA.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 01:13 AM
10

The only thing we can do is advocate for real equality, not female supremacy.
/r/MensRights24/07/26 02:59 AM
38

I don't know what you country you live in, but in the West, they respond a lot more if a woman calls them than if a man calls them.
/r/MensRights24/07/26 02:53 AM
2

LMAO
/r/MensRights24/07/26 02:49 AM
1

Also, how would I turn off this "memory"? And is this "memory" a function of the AI, or is it just in my computer?
/r/MensRights24/07/26 02:47 AM
1

Interesting. So, if someone asks my AI about me, it will tell them nothing?
/r/MensRights24/07/26 02:45 AM
11

Reminds me of a one night stand I had once. At the beginning she said "I come first", like it was an order.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 05:54 PM
1

Title sounds like the verbiage from The Manipulated Man.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 05:51 PM
3

Sounds like an abusive relationship.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 05:47 PM
1

I just re-watched the video, very carefully, and I suggest you do the same. Every time he touched HER ARMS as they were folded under her breasts. Not once did he touch her boobs. Watch the video with your eyes open.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 05:38 PM
0

"any new conversation will reverse it to its default" Actually that's not true. I've had a running conversation with Google AI on a completely different topic, and sometimes it remembers things from one day to the next.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 05:34 PM
0

He was not touching her boobs.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 02:46 AM
2

Yup, a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 09:04 PM
2

I have noticed that too, yes. LMAO
/r/MensRights22/07/26 06:54 PM
2

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 06:10 PM
2

Props for learning not to care my dude.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 06:02 PM
0

I could not agree more.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 02:18 AM
14

It's about hating men, not believing. They think "even if he didn't rape her, he must've done something to piss her off, so send him to prison". How often have you heard women say dumb sh&t like they'd kill her husband if he ever cheated on her? Outlandish punishments for doing nothing more than pissing a woman off.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 02:16 AM
2

I taught at an all-girl school once. It was the only time I've ever been sexually harassed by a colleague.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 03:42 AM
1

Actually I've found if you have solid data, I can convince it. I've even told it "you're all wet" and laid the data out, and it admits that I am right. Actually, it's more reasonable than most online people. LMAO
/r/MensRights21/07/26 03:41 AM
2

"it begs the question whether [straight] men are checking out of dating completely." If they're smart they are checking out.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 03:38 AM
0

It did account for that. "After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, “men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do,” and “[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted.” This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper." https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Articles?DataId=1370030
/r/MensRights21/07/26 03:32 AM
1

You're welcome friend.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 03:31 AM
1

Yeah, I know.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 03:30 AM
9

The 63% figure factors in criminal history.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 11:18 PM
6

Yup, you are correct. My comment in other places here said the gender difference is 6 times bigger than the race difference, but there is a race difference, yes. Your real problem is you used the wrong poster, except for the fact in green about a white victim, this poster is about gender. But your title implies this is mostly about race. You really should change either the poster or the title, since they do not match. Pick one, is this about race or gender?
/r/MensRights19/07/26 11:00 PM
8

Includes criminal history.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:31 PM
1

Ok thanks
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:29 PM
4

After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, “men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do,” and “[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted.” This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper. https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Articles?DataId=1370030
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:27 PM
8

After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, “men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do,” and “[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted.” This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper. https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Articles?DataId=1370030
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:26 PM
11

"After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, “men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do,” and “[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted.” This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper." https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Articles?DataId=1370030
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:20 PM
7

The 63% figure in the poster has nothing to do with race, it is comparing men and women PERIOD. Read the poster carefully.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:19 PM
14

Race is not a factor in that poster. read it carefully, it says men have 63% longer sentences, not black men.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:17 PM
10

This OP title is very misleading. The 63% gap is between men and women, NOT BETWEEN BLACK MEN AND WOMEN.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:15 PM
6

"After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, “men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do,” and “[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted.” This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper." https://www.legalnews.com/Home/Articles?DataId=1370030
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:13 PM
12

I recall reading gender is the bigger issue by quite a bit, but they are both an issue.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:09 PM
2

I suppose they took this down because they said it had nothing to do with mens right?
/r/MensRights19/07/26 09:06 PM
16

Yeah, I know some don't like AI, but it had the only short summary I could find of these guidelines. New guidelines developed by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and European Athletics, titled "Raising the Bar," advise broadcasters on filming female athletes respectfully to prevent unnecessary sexualization. The rules focus on prioritizing athletic performance, technique, and emotion over physical appearance or objectifying angles. [1, 2, 3, 4] Key Recommendations for Broadcasters Avoid Low…
/r/MensRights19/07/26 03:04 AM
7

And you think it's "bad" for men to want to look at pretty women? Is it bad for women to drool over Beckham? Have you noticed how often magazines have attractive people, male or female, on the cover? Why would that be if it was not normal to like looking at attractive people?
/r/MensRights19/07/26 02:57 AM
1

Great book of course.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 02:49 AM
1

Good study.
/r/MensRights19/07/26 02:37 AM
3

About your simple-minded use of the word "patriarchy", https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1urxk6u/stop_using_the_more_recent_definition_of/
/r/MensRights19/07/26 02:15 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights18/07/26 07:29 PM
49

Not just Europe, it's the whole West.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 12:38 AM
14

Here's the most recent thing I could find on it. It's 5 days ago. https://cnycentral.com/news/local/beyond-the-weekend-heres-what-is-happening-in-cny-this-week-07-12-2026
/r/MensRights18/07/26 12:36 AM
1

I'm blushing.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 09:24 PM
1

Seconded.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 05:35 PM
0

Well said my friend.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 05:34 PM
2

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 04:16 AM
48

The only people who feel that way are those who wish to stifle the agenda of real equality.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:19 AM
5

DiMarco, D., McDonough, C., & Savitz, R. (2023). Rates of male sexual coercion: Comparison with female rates, and comparison between sexual orientations. Sexuality & Culture, 1-14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374715014_Rates_of_Male_Sexual_Coercion_Comparison_with_Female_Rates_and_Comparison_Between_Sexual_Orientations Compares the rates of male and female victimization of sexual coercion, concludes, among other things that "we see that number of heterosexual male victims is 74.8% o…
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:17 AM
3

A term brought to the fore by Sabrina Carpenter, the one who said she writes songs by saying men are stupid in every way possible. I believe more specifically it is the title of one of her songs.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 03:02 AM
2

"women don’t need to be wrapped in cotton wool." I think this should be pinned at the top of this sub. This is basically the MRA position in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:56 AM
7

Bravo good sir. Every now and them I fire off a letter like that too. I've yet to get a response by the way.
/r/MensRights17/07/26 02:54 AM
5

Weird man, just weird. Anyway, thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 06:31 PM
2

About that definition of patriarchy. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1urxk6u/stop_using_the_more_recent_definition_of/
/r/MensRights16/07/26 06:26 PM
6

Can you explain that to me? I'm just wondering what was going through her head to be even be mad about, let alone that mad. The only thing I can think of, is maybe she thought a dinner like that meant you'd have sex with her afterwards, but that's a big stretch.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 06:18 PM
3

Man, men can be amazingly stupid.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 06:14 PM
1

It's about a woman having a less than happy face, and there being a man around. All it takes these days.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 06:09 PM
2

So, you don't think there are lots of women like that?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:30 AM
5

Pre-nups also get thrown out of court a lot. Look into a trust instead of a pre-nup. Esp if you have a big ticket item, like a mansion.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 02:27 AM
7

He was at most 12 years old to, if you do the math and assume "late 30s now" means 39.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 06:33 PM
6

The closest I've seen to equality are the first 2 CDC reports on this, which said about women rape men 80% as often as men rape women. Now 80% is a lot, but it's not 100%, so even this says men rape more, not by a lot, but more. There was a 2 year break then 2 (or was it 3) more CDC reports came out. In those it was less than 80%. IMO this was suspicious because they waited 2 years then came out with more reports, why? To make feminists happy? Now, you mentioned sexual assault. SA is any unwante…
/r/MensRights15/07/26 06:16 PM
0

Tl:dr but you're first two paragraphs are brilliant.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:21 AM
2

This is one of those things where I guess I'm just different. I mean I don't cry on the shoulders of strangers, but among friends or online, I have no trouble opening up.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:19 AM
3

REPORT THEM REPORT THEM REPORT THEM
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:13 AM
5

Nice catch.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:10 AM
12

There is a lot of truth to that. Nevertheless, men are falling behind. Even in STEM men are slightly behind in the USA.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:06 AM
0

Scumf&%ks
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:03 AM
35

Yup. In my opinion, Stemple (2014) was the second most important paper about women raping men. First place goes to the first paper to mention it, Masters & Sarrell in the 1980s.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 02:59 AM
1

Gotta remember though, that masks lots of double standards.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 02:55 AM
8

"Rape is mostly a male thing" CDC data saying women rape men 80% as often as men rape women. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gen-der neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states tha…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 05:30 PM
5

BINGO!!
/r/MensRights14/07/26 05:26 PM
1

I think her letting a child close enough to her genitals to touch them as she's on the bowl and just laughing is pretty darn damning. I mean I doubt the child flew at her vagina, 2 year olds tend to move slowly. So she must have just watched him move towards her and let him do it.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 05:23 PM
6

One of the dumbest practices I've ever heard of.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 01:48 AM
7

Word
/r/MensRights13/07/26 08:03 PM
3

Beat me to it.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:58 PM
2

On my neighborhood email system a woman called her husband an idiot in a blast email. On the plus side, her email was taken down. Maybe they don't allow women to do that?
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:57 PM
2

Maybe you should call the cops? Think how they could not blame him if a neutral third party reported it.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:56 PM
7

Repulsive would be the word.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:54 PM
1

This picture is perfect for this OP https://www.pinterest.com/pin/21603273207567104/
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:49 PM
2

Maybe I'm different, but I have little trouble opening up online.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 09:33 PM
3

I would have jumped in and challenged them most of the time. I'll admit if it was a feminist channel and the attacks were really bad, probably not though. Kind of pointless then. Unless I just felt like pissing them off. LMAO Yeah, I might jump in then. LMAO
/r/MensRights12/07/26 09:28 PM
1

I called a girl ugly once in high school. Not my best moment.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 09:26 PM
12

"Why do so many men participate in movies and TV shows that repeatedly portray men as incompetent, immature, disposable, emotionally deficient, or as people who always need to be corrected?" Good question. Some women and some blacks won't take certain roles if they feel it stereotypes their character or makes them look stupid. Anybody hear about a straight white guy doing the same? Yeah, neither have I. I'll take a guess as to why. The Left has commandeered morality, so "moral" is what's good fo…
/r/MensRights12/07/26 09:20 PM
2

I agree, that would be best. Except that is not realistic, it never works. So equality is the lesser of the two evils. Always works out that way. Like the Rolling Stones said, "you can't always get what you want."
/r/MensRights12/07/26 09:08 PM
23

Pretty much the ones that women actually have.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 03:15 AM
24

Yeah, I was not aware of that being done to male actors. But even without knowing that, you knew the rule would only be enforced for women. Is a sexual rule ever used to protect males?
/r/MensRights12/07/26 01:59 AM
15

That's derailing the conversation. The OP made it clear the issue is double standards.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 01:57 AM
2

This is about STEM. AI is used in hiring, and it discriminates against men https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1uakviq/ai_is_used_for_hiring_study_shows_it/ In the USA women are OVERrepresented in STEM, and even more so in the UK https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1krm6dc/the_truth_about_women_in_stem/
/r/MensRights11/07/26 09:27 PM
-8

Thank you.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:27 AM
-9

Not sure why dimwits voted down my request for examples. And 21 down votes too, some not very bright people here.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:27 AM
1

OH, OK. I said the list was fine.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 03:20 AM
-2

Not sure how the wiki helps, but OK.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 06:30 PM
21

Feminist imagine it, and given the Leftist media, voila, it becomes reality. It's MAGIC!!!
/r/MensRights10/07/26 06:24 PM
-38

Why don't you guys post some of this joy? None is shown in this article. u/SarcasticallyCandour
/r/MensRights10/07/26 06:21 PM
2

I suggest deleting this OP and reposting it with a title making it more obvious you mean popular culture as in entertainment. EDIT: But if you don't, then I say anti-male violence in anime. I'm no into anime, but I've heard the anti-male violence is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 06:14 PM
-4

Great list, but under wrong OP, he meant in popular culture. You know, entertainment. Read the OP. u/USMC0317 u/StrangeBuy3037
/r/MensRights10/07/26 06:13 PM
22

The wheelchair players is a good counterpoint to the female claim for equal pay in sports. People should start using that.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 06:09 PM
1

You know, considering how long this data has been going around, it's disappointing that people like you are still ignorant of the facts. CDC data saying women rape men 80% as often as men rape women. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, usi…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 05:58 PM
1

Yeah, I got that. Thus my ambivalence. (Google the word if you don't know it).
/r/MensRights10/07/26 05:51 PM
1

No problem, glad you figure out a way.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 03:27 AM
2

LMAO
/r/MensRights09/07/26 09:07 PM
3

Trump won white women though.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 09:05 PM
0

I don't know how to do that, but since no one else is answering you, I'll take a whack at it. Have you tried clicking the Share icon under that comment? Also, you could ask the mods.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 07:28 PM
36

When feminist hit you with that, tell them most fat shaming is done by other women. By the way, so is most harassment of women https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ugfvl6/whose_more_misogynistic_men_or_women/
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:21 PM
7

"My recommendation - ignore these language games and continue to use the words the "old" way." THIS^^^^^^
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:17 PM
2

Gives men less flexibility in appearance. Just like men have fewer choices in cloths.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:15 PM
1

One of two places. Either the CDC definition of rape as penetration, or just counting REPORTED rapes.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:12 PM
0

Feeling ambivalent about this one. Yeah, the accusation had no investigation or proof. Then again, this guy is a grifter who had to go. No tears from me.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:10 PM
1

Well, women do have an extra layer of fat.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:08 PM
6

Ignore the video title. The video presenter agrees with this comment "Boys are not falling behind; feminists in leadership positions are deliberately disenfranchising boys and young men in favor of making sure that young women advance; they're suppressing us, exactly the way they accused us of oppressing them. I've lost education as well as employment opportunities because of feminist ideology. There was a study that said boys scored significantly higher on tests when the tests being graded were…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:04 PM
9

The video agrees with you. The title is just misleading. Under the video the video presenter agreed with this comment "Boys are not falling behind; feminists in leadership positions are deliberately disenfranchising boys and young men in favor of making sure that young women advance; they're suppressing us, exactly the way they accused us of oppressing them. I've lost education as well as employment opportunities because of feminist ideology. There was a study that said boys scored significantly…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:02 PM
2

Not to mention he said "quasi" u/Current_Sir9406
/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:55 PM
7

Stop using the recent feminist friendly definition of patriarchy. I just posted an OP about that in this sub. u/Current_Sir9406
/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:53 PM
1

This is a great study. I already knew about it. I have a link to what used to be a magazine article about this study, but seems that article has disappeared.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:35 PM
42

What's done to men in prisons is beyond description. No, this isn't done to all prisoners, but to far too many of them.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:27 PM
6

Socialist only care about power. If you can help them by winning, they'd nominate Josef Stalin.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 05:22 PM
1

There are too many here like that. But if you're saying it's most of us - no way.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 04:54 PM
1

Yeah, I know. And they used non-monogamy instead of polygamy, which they would have used if it was a man.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 04:47 PM
3

Yeah, the father laughing got me too.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 01:26 AM
3

Amen brother.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 01:25 AM
2

BRAVO GOOD SIR!!
/r/MensRights08/07/26 06:18 PM
14

No, it is not worth it.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 06:16 PM
7

Race arguments do that to an even greater degree. Most race issues come down to class. Most, not all.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 06:15 PM
15

I came here to say "good", beat me to it.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 06:14 PM
8

It's about equality and consistency, not prudery.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 05:28 PM
3

Oh, I did not understand that. To me, PM = Private Message. In that case, I'm sorry, but I have to be anonymous from this account. Identifying my high school comes too close to identifying myself. Anyone knowing me, if they saw my high school would know this is me. u/Putrid_Risk3560
/r/MensRights08/07/26 03:44 AM
2

No, I can't PM the school. Not that I know of anyway.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 02:44 AM
13

You mean now? That was years ago. Looking back, I should have complained back then though.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 02:12 AM
53

What happens when you complain? As for me, when I went back to my old high school as a substitute teacher, they had taken the doors off of the boys bathrooms. (Teachers had their own bathrooms, so it did not effect me). So, if a girl walked down the middle of the hall, she only had to turn her head sideways to get a full scan of the entire boys room, including seeing the boys standing at the urinals from behind.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 02:07 AM
2

You're like me. Sometimes I cry while driving to work.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 03:17 AM
-2

So don't date fellas - just sayin'
/r/MensRights07/07/26 03:11 AM
0

Yeah, I can't read that.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 03:09 AM
5

Well said.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 03:03 AM
1

I could not agree more with you on this.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 02:58 AM
2

Not down voted now. Sometimes I think the trolls come first here.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 02:47 AM
17

"What can I do??" LEAVE. Best thing to do for your kids too. You said it, even they can see what's going on.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 01:45 AM
6

Stop being a dope - LEAVE. Exposing your kids to a hateful marriage is not doing them any favors. You're sacrificing yourself for no reason.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 01:43 AM
26

That's because they don't want to sound misogynist. Or they're just stupid.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 01:40 AM
0

Because, at this point, men have no choice. Now it's just done in self defense.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 01:32 AM
2

I forgot this was India.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 01:30 AM
1

Interesting.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 01:29 AM
1

Did anyone say anything to her about that ridiculous book?
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:56 AM
4

Every now and then there's a post about books like that. They show just how oppressed men really are. For example, here's a blurb about the book How to Destroy a Man Now (DAMN). And in case anyone counters this is just about how to destroy men who misbehave, that would assume women are perfect and would never misuse what the book lays out, which is a joke of course. Dr. Angela Confidential is an accomplished business psychologist, consultant, and human resource professional. She coaches executiv…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:55 AM
0

Dude, that's such a big umbrella issue, you could argue that all of men's rights falls under that one issue.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:43 AM
8

And my point is fighting for equality can sometimes be mistaken for those things. For example, grabbing someone's ass is sexual assault. But some people who are not aware, might think a male griping about a woman grabbing his ass is him just being "too sensitive", because, well those people are sexist themselves. They might think he is "feigning offense" to use your words.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:42 AM
1

Yup. If you apply the race issues/standards to the genders, you end up concluding it's men who are the oppressed gender. So they (the political Left) had to come up with a completely different set of issues to conclude that women are oppressed. Of course the point is to conclude that the group that tends to support the Left is the oppressed group. So men tend to vote Republican more than women, so we have to conclude that men oppress women. Whites tend to vote Republican more than minorities, so…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:36 AM
4

I've always said that fetish female domination is bleeding into everyday real life.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:26 AM
15

u/Wylanderuk Has it occurred to you that men too are now fighting for fairness and equality. So maybe that's why men seem to be following women to some extent. I say it's about time myself.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:25 AM
13

That's actually not a bad response.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:22 AM
4

I would say it about a woman being punched in the boobs because both are sexual assault.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:21 AM
16

I think it's actually SEXUAL assault, esp if it's done by a woman.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:20 AM
3

Well said.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:19 AM
15

Not surprising, but very sickening.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:16 AM
66

I think the comeback to that is that it's mostly WOMEN who body shame other women. I mean men might say something if a woman is obese, but it's women who'll quibble if she's a size 8.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:12 AM
18

WOW! Is that because it's Texas? lol
/r/MensRights04/07/26 02:43 AM
18

I was trying to recall that sub - you beat me to it.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 02:14 AM
2

It's about race. LMAO I seem to recall the percentage of black girls in college is higher than the percent of boys in college.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:29 PM
1

If she does say it all of the time, what do they say when you tell them that?
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:26 PM
6

Problem was, she was alone in the sentiment of course.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:21 PM
1

Yeah, I think the timing of the Iran war was the dumbest political move he ever made. It's like he's trying to give the midterms to the Democrats. The war turned out pretty bad, but the dumbest part was, hey, even if the war went better, he should have done it AFTER the midterms. Why raise inflation BEFORE the damn elections? Especially when affordability is the issue of the day.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:19 PM
1

In the USA I know Trump I think has stopped the use of the word diversity. Of course many are still doing it, and just not using that word.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 02:41 AM
2

Signed
/r/MensRights01/07/26 02:38 AM
5

Dumb comment.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 02:30 AM
1

I got a better example. There are youtube videos of adult women wrestling at, or near, the Olympic level. Man, what those women do to each other. I'm just glad they're not doing that stuff to men. LMAO
/r/MensRights01/07/26 02:27 AM
14

And, by the way, fewer scholarships for men is discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:44 AM
16

I always LOVED the way, whenever there's fewer women in anything it's discrimination and stereotypes making them not want to do it. But when there's fewer men it's "they just decided not to do it." /s
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:43 AM
2

True.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:40 AM
14

Yeah, didn't exactly turn out as she hoped, did it? LMAO Too bad they didn't follow her lead.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:39 AM
5

Women are 60% of college students. "Men are not behind" LMAO
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:45 PM
7

Because they are allowed to be, of course.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:37 PM
2

Truth.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 09:19 PM
6

My standard response to whites who hate whites or men who hate men. "You know, you want fewer of your kind around, there's one very simply way you can achieve that, that will not harm anyone else. You first."
/r/MensRights30/06/26 07:34 PM
2

On the plus side, most of the comments are great.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 07:29 PM
1

Here's my favorite. Feminists attacking men in a riot. Spray painting the men's faces and crotches, spitting on the men, and so on. EDIT: OK, this is a great example. So why the hell would anyone down vote this?? LMAO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOCD_T9Qqpc
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:36 AM
1

Two posts after this one in this sub, there's a huge meta-study that says men are discriminated against in hiring.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 03:25 AM
6

Word
/r/MensRights28/06/26 03:09 AM
0

His mother said he probably didn't fight back. If he went through this and did not fight back, that is dumb. Men have to defend themselves once it gets past a certain point. "At the crime scene, a room at Smugglers Cove, a hotel in Clacton-on-Sea, Essex, paramedics found Self’s blood on the walls, bedding, door handle and floor. “She’d smashed his head so hard on the wall it had made a dent,” says Smith, speaking today in the calm surroundings of her countryside home near Great Finborough in Suf…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 03:09 AM
0

No, because they only counting tweets that were aggressive too.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 03:01 AM
1

Yeah, that got me too. LMAO What kind of institution is calling women sluts in Tweets??
/r/MensRights28/06/26 03:00 AM
2

"Men love women (they just don't like them these days)." You should get a 1,000 upvotes just for that sentence.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:53 AM
2

You're missing that they only counted those tweets which had those words AND WERE CLASSIFIED AS AGGRESSIVE. So they factored in "A woman calling another woman a "slut" or "whore" is not in itself misogynyistic." u/Juniper_Owl
/r/MensRights26/06/26 09:32 PM
10

You missed my point. I tried to point out that a person can rage at a woman that she is a slut on twitter without hating women in general. I realize our society tries to tell us that you don't call someone a bigoted insult unless you are a bigot through and through, but I'm saying that's a load of crap.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 08:14 PM
13

Well, someone who rants sexist crap at a woman might not hate all women you know. Feminists push that they are, but that's because they want to paint all men as misogynist. I said in the OP they are more misogynistic. Not that most died in the wool misogynists are women. They are two different things.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 07:41 PM
0

Ah, the old "blame the nearest male" trope. An oldie but goodie. And works all too often.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 06:20 PM
0

WOMEN: In domestic violence, we should talk about abused women, because most abuse is against women (not true of course). And even when it is against men, men get hurt less. So I don't care about abused men. MEN: Overall, men are murdered 2 to 3 times as much as women are, so we need to pay much more attention to murdered men than we pay to murdered women. WOMEN: MISOGYNIST!!!! BIGOT!!!! RAPIST!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights26/06/26 06:18 PM
7

Actually that is exactly what makes my argument true. You not that good at logic?
/r/MensRights26/06/26 01:25 AM
1

It has the acronym AWDTSG in the sub title.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 01:23 AM
0

They say that is because men don't take care of themselves unless a woman prods them to do so. I'm single, completely unattached. I get annual check ups with my doctor, with my optometrist and with my dermatologist. Never miss a single one. I see a chiropractor regularly for back pains. I also exercise 6 days a week, an hour each day. I keep my weight steady at about 170 pounds. Don't know about other guys, but I'm doing fine.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 06:05 PM
5

There is an entire sub dedicated to those sites. Not sure I'm supposed to mention other that sub here, but you can just ask AI about such a sub.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:59 PM
2

Even after years of doing this, I can still be surprised.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:48 PM
6

By the way, the average American woman weighs 170 pounds, which is about my size. The average man weighs about 200 pounds. Bigger, but not that much bigger.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:42 PM
18

Actually this subreddit talks about that a lot. My standard response to that is, the best indication that is more about sexism than strength differences is they say that to little boys too, and at that age, the strength difference between little boys and little girls is not that much. When I was a little kid, I got beat up by girls just as often as I got beat up by other little boys. I'm on the small side.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 05:40 PM
1

GROAN!!!
/r/MensRights25/06/26 03:00 AM
1

Why was this taken down?
/r/MensRights24/06/26 09:01 PM
9

BINGO^^
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:46 PM
5

This is one time I can say that this is NOT an India thing, it's every Western nation too. In the USA, women are OVER represented in STEM, yet there are lots of female only STEM scholarships here.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:43 PM
2

If everything I've heard about India is true, a lot of women there must think they have an innate right to kill any man they feel like.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:39 PM
3

Thumbs up
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:28 PM
3

In other words, false consciousness is guilt imposed on you by brainwashing. And you are so right. Males and whites. Male guilt, white guilt. They explain how some straight, white guys vote Democrat. I never understood how someone can be be so suggestible that they can be convinced they should fell guilty about something that happened 100 years before they were born. Must be a lack of critical thinking. One time I told a friend of mine very forcefully, that I FEEL NO WHITE OR MALE GUILT AT ALL, …
/r/MensRights24/06/26 08:24 PM
1

Then don't ask questions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 02:50 AM
2

Bullsh%t! Blame the man no matter what.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 02:48 AM
0

Really? LMAO Read the title of this OP again, then read my comment again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 02:37 AM
3

I can agree with that.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 04:01 AM
2

Yeah, a thousand times that.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 03:39 AM
1

Ah, so you think MAGA is just Trump supporters. Yeah, the your statement here that "MAGA is ultra feminist. Fake tradwives posting for views and attention" is like ultra-bulls&t. Like I said, you cannot generalize all Trump supporters as Tradcons. I'm a Trump supporter who is not even a conservative, much less a tradcon. I'm actually apolitical.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 03:39 AM
1

MAGA is not a monolith. Actually, I'm not sure MAGA even exists. I mean, how would you define MAGA? If it just means anyone who supports Trump, then you cannot generalize them at all.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 02:25 AM
7

I hope you told everyone about Joshua following you home to jump you. An older kid attacking you outside of school is NOT cool my dude. Did you tell your parents, counselor, the main office? You should not have to be walking with two other guys all of the time.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:52 AM
6

Back in the day, I think Karen Straughan said England was the closest thing to a matriarchy that there was.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:39 AM
1

Like I told the other guy, MAGA and trad cons are two different things. You must be a Liberal to think that they are. u/SearchCapital7719
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:36 AM
2

MAGA and trad cons are two different things. You must be a Liberal to think that they are.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:34 AM
2

Because women are a bigger voting block than men.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:30 AM
3

If that was actually true then you would have said my comment was not relevant to what you said. I have to learn to not take trolls seriously. I'll no longer waste my time with you. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:21 AM
3

Quite common I'm sure.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 09:22 PM
2

Oh, so you have them in high traffic places. Thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 09:22 PM
2

I said "There are feminists at universities who admire these people." And, in a separate comment I said feminists also like Andrea Dworkin, who was almost as bad as Solanas. So you might have had only Solanas in mind, but I did not. So I said nothing about universities respecting her, so you moved my goal posts, as Leftist love to do, move those goal posts. Catherine Lord was a professor. And if you're not happy with this, then do your own damn research. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valeri…
/r/MensRights21/06/26 09:18 PM
2

Are you in Europe? I heard Europe has more private bathrooms than the USA.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 08:51 PM
2

Yup.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 03:03 AM
2

But feminism is just the advocacy of gender equality /s
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:33 AM
2

Karma
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:19 AM
5

"One person doesn't define a movement," If the movement fails to condemn said person, then yes, that person does define a movement. Just like the Left has always said, "If you're not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem." This is how they always condemn those on the right who did not condemn racists. It's not enough to not be racist, you have to VOCIFEROUSLY condemn those who are racist. People on the Right have to learn how to use this tactic as well.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:17 AM
0

Because you're asking stupid questions. Here's what Google AI just told me. Andrea Dworkin's legacy as an influential radical feminist writer and activist is explicitly celebrated, studied, and admired at her alma mater, Bennington College in Vermont. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Academic Centers and Archive Spaces While her polarizing views on pornography and sexual violence caused intense debate during her lifetime, today her intellectual contributions are preserved, taught, and valued across several promi…
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:02 AM
9

There are feminists at universities who admire these people.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 06:52 PM
6

I've heard Europe's restrooms are more private than ours in the USA.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 06:50 PM
7

If you had watched the video you would've seen there was no assumption at all. The guy knew he was her father before he called the cops.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 06:48 PM
12

If women were not allowed to violate our spaces, then that would be OK. But letting women in with men, would only allow women to spy on us while we would get in trouble for spying on them. So that is a bad idea.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 06:47 PM
0

Uh, saying whether or not you can post under some circumstances depends on your identity is bigotry.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 05:50 AM
7

Yup, that was my point.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 05:13 AM
1

OK, glad to hear it.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:30 AM
31

Hey, there are feminist who like Andrea Dworkin too. Almost as bad!
/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:29 AM
3

If you think I was suggesting we do that, I edited the OP for those who think that way.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:27 AM
3

"So, cool. You've spared me the mistake of confusing it for a place for open discussion" You are talking to the askwomen sub, right? Because in no way did I suggest we should do that.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:20 AM
1

Well, since there are no women in my social life, I guess technically that would be true.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 02:15 AM
3

Trusts are often better than pre-nups. Pre-nups often get tossed out of courts.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 05:47 PM
-1

Some good reasons here not to socialize with women. The fact it's not all women is just an attempt to derail the conversation. It's plenty of women.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 03:36 AM
0

I think the only way for men to win is if men stop pursuing women. If men stop dating and marrying women, then women will not have access to male resources. This would force women to come to the table to negotiate. The problem is, whenever I say this, even in this sub, most men don't realize this. They say they don't want to do this. Until men change this attitude, our progress will be slow.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 03:31 AM
2

I wish they would go back to making at least some videos that are less than an hour long. Every time I go there, every video is at least 1.5 hours long. Not everyone has that much free time.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 03:22 AM
0

As some have pointed out below, you can find such data, but you have to be a researcher.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 02:57 AM
1

Read EDIT #2
/r/MensRights18/06/26 02:54 AM
1

I think this is fantastic! Great job!!!
/r/MensRights16/06/26 06:44 PM
17

LMAO You think opposing that a group has rights is just a "different view". I mean technically you're right of course. In the sense a KKK guy has a different view from a member of the NAACP. I gotta admit, they do have different views.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 06:30 PM
15

This whole thing has brought to light quite a few black racists actually.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 06:20 PM
2

HOLY COW! Thank you so much. I had no idea. I'm going to edit your comment into the OP.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 05:45 PM
4

If you're publishing a paper on this, you almost have to say things like "We recognize women have it bad too etc". The thing is, this quote goes beyond that. This quote was simply not necessary.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 05:35 PM
2

That almost alien thing is Socialism, in combination with corrupt politicians will to go Socialist just to keep their worthless asses in power.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:59 AM
1

I was giving you the benefit of the doubt. That you actually had a reason to say this dumb stuff. The only reason to reflexively react negatively to AI is because you think it will take away jobs. But if you want to sound even dumber than that, to oppose AI for literally no reason at all, then go for it. And by the way, I'm pushing 70, and I teach, so I've done plenty of research all through my life. But just like I'm not dumb enough to use typewriters any more, I'm also not dumb enough to avoid…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:56 AM
1

You want to walk around looking away from people, have at it. I will say hello to whomever I feel like. And, by the way dimwit, lots of people ignore you and look away. Then when you say hello, they smile and say hello back. In fact that happens most of the time. And I can't help but notice the irony that you stalked me to this old comment to tell me not to say hello to people.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:52 AM
5

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 07:35 PM
8

The book does acknowledge discrimination is the cause of some of this. Like I said, overall it is a great book, but how the hell they felt OK including these two quotes is beyond me. To their credit, later they do say having fewer men in education will cause bad things.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 07:34 PM
4

It looks like a big book. What I linked you to was just one chapter. I doubt only one man wrote the whole book. But I don't know for sure.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 07:18 PM
13

You know, it does say a lot of great stuff about males falling behind in education, but these quotes! OH MY GOD! Anyway, here's the book. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2008). The reversal of gender inequalities in higher education: An on-going trend. In S. Vincent-Lancrin & K. Kärkkäinen (Eds.), Higher education to 2030: Vol. 1. Demography (pp. 265–298). OECD Publishing. archive.org
/r/MensRights15/06/26 07:12 PM
1

The how the hell do you justify saying this? Even if we were to suppose that your given proportion of false accusations was true, the subsequent ratio of women who are sexually assaulted compared to men whose lives are affected by false accusations of such events is over 50:1. Regardless of what the ratio is, it’s really concerning to me that you and mras in general are putting your attention onto the side much less affected. I thought this space was about striving for societal improvemen
/r/MensRights15/06/26 06:46 PM
1

From my EDIT #2: EDIT #2: OK, that apparently many think " & Sons" should have been included is odd. Naming a company after an individual is designed to make that person feel loved and special. WTF is so special about & Sons? It doesn't even pick out an individual, it groups all of the sons together, like no one of them by himself is important enough to be acknowledged. They only deserve recognition if you group them all together. This is pretty obvious folks.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 06:44 PM
4

WHOOOOSH!
/r/MensRights15/06/26 05:41 PM
1

Two irrelevancies there. But OK.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 05:39 PM
1

Company founders are enough to form a large sample. And by the way, chatgpt is not Google. Google AI is called Gemini. And don't be a dumbass, my worldview on gender was found long before yesterday when I found this out. You sound like a troll.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 05:36 PM
0

Fried fish! YUM!
/r/MensRights15/06/26 05:31 PM
1

There was no one else around, so it's not true that she "noticeably didn’t want to talk to anyone". More importantly why the hell are you replying to a 2-month old post from me? Did you search my profile for old comments? Less stalker dude.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 05:30 PM
0

Look, I get it. A lot of people are afraid AI is going to kill their job. But the notion that you think typing comments like this is going to change ANYTHING is beyond fanciful.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 05:27 PM
1

OK, where to begin. Instead of comparing the number of women who were sexually assaulted to the number of men who are sexually assaulted, you compared it to the number of false allegations, which implies you're one of those ignoramuses who thinks the number of men who are sexually assaulted is minimal. Try reading this. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women wer…
/r/MensRights15/06/26 05:23 PM
-1

Sorry, but AI is here to stay. Stop crying in your beer and get used to it.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 03:03 AM
1

I'm sorry, but using her likeness as the logo and naming the company after her are two entirely different things. "And obviously there is a connection between thinking your child is competent and valuing them." I would assert the connection is more of Wendy's dad's love of her, and his opinion that her name and likeness will sell better.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 03:02 AM
2

You should've saved yourself the time. The FBI report is too long for me to read it all now. (Unless you care to give me the pages. But that crap about false allegations being between 2 and 8% is old news. It usually just counts the cases that were proved to be false (without using DNA). When you realize how impossible it is to PROVE you did not do something, you realize what a crap statistic that is. (Actually your Scottish one talks about the cases where there was not enough evidence to prove …
/r/MensRights15/06/26 02:50 AM
1

I'm not sure they are of my sub. Most of these names are not familiar.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 02:25 AM
1

The idea that naming the company after your daughter will help it succeed is questionable at best. You think the word Mercedes or Brita is going to make people run to the store? And by the way, daughters inherit the business too. Now, inheriting the business has another big issue. You give your business to the one you think can best run the company. That's got nothing to do with love, and everything to do with your opinion of how competent each child is.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:49 PM
2

Moxon, S. FALSE RAPE REPORTS TO POLICE FORM A VERY LARGE PROPORTION OF CASES, AND THIS IS AMPLY EXPLAINED. New Male Studies: An International Journal (2024). Vol 13, Issue 2, p. 66 – 94 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387437812_FALSE_RAPE_REPORTS_TO_POLICE_FORM_A_VERY_LARGE_PROPORTION_OF_CASES_AND_THIS_IS_AMPLY_EXPLAINED#fullTextFileContent
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:41 PM
0

Since you seem to be logic-deprived, let me focus you on my point. You said "No, my position is: "IF a man has a daughter(s) and no son(s) and he decides to name his company after his daughter how is that "sexism"?" See, for this is to explain the facts, there would have to be for fewer sons being born than daughters. It's a question of probabilities. More sons than daughters are born, so for this part of your argument to hold, company founders would have to be only among the minority of men who…
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:38 PM
1

Read EDIT #2 u/okaygirlie u/sgtm7
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:26 PM
-1

I gotta give you two credit. Of all the crap arguments I see here, you've got the only possibly valid one with that bit about girls names tend to sound prettier than boys names. Of course, you could counter that by saying girls names being prettier is also a kind of sexism. Saying maybe they didn't have a son is not valid. More boys are actually born than girls. thelioness, none of your other arguments make any sense at all though. u/MisterBowTies
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:17 PM
1

& Sons is not naming your company after your Son. Just means your sons work for the company. Not the same thing.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:12 PM
1

& Sons is not naming your company after your Son. Just means your sons work for the company. Not the same thing. u/Leshie_Leshie
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:11 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:09 PM
0

So, your position is very few people have sons compared to daughters, so more companies are named after daughters? One thing wrong with that, more sons are actually born than daughters.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:08 PM
2

It's about companies named after offspring. & Sons is not that.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 09:06 PM
-4

Your argument is silly. My point is that men value their daughters more than their sons. The company name thing is just one indication of that. I am not complaining because more companies are named after daughters. I am complaining because men value sons less than daughters. The company thing is just one more piece of evidence of this. So your argument is crap and shortsighted. Gotta leave for the night soon, so cannot argue with you that much longer here. Thank you for this. I shall edit my OP …
/r/MensRights14/06/26 04:26 AM
-5

"And how this shows men value their daughters more than their sons. Their precious daughters."
/r/MensRights14/06/26 04:04 AM
14

Trump won white women. The Leftist media wants you to forget that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 03:45 AM
66

"Men built the world. We don't owe apologies for it." Hear, hear.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 02:50 AM
4

About 50% of rape accusations are false. I call that pretty big.
/r/MensRights14/06/26 02:37 AM
4

"Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gen-der neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that 12 months the number of men who were forced to penetrate someone is 1,267,000, …
/r/MensRights14/06/26 02:35 AM
3

"Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gen-der neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that 12 months the number of men who were forced to penetrate someone is 1,267,000, …
/r/MensRights14/06/26 02:33 AM
16

Man you are so full of sh&t.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:46 AM
5

Grok is Elon Musk, so yeah, that would make sense. Elon is not exactly "woke".
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:37 AM
7

"A good chunk of men are rich." WTF am I supposed to say about that? LMAO I mean, I wish it was so, but geez, delusional much.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:33 AM
52

I suspect the reason you're not getting many responses is, most people here have no idea what India is like. I mean if this was the USA, we'd be like "call the cops". But I have no idea how to respond to this happening in India. I do feel very sorry for you having to go through this.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 01:30 AM
5

And cheaper.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 07:20 PM
3

Your #2 is in their reason #3. Also, typo in your #1 - "most divorces end in divorce". But overall, of course you are right. No mainstream article is going to sound like posts in this sub. But I was astounded that it did not sound like posts in a feminist sub either. Like I said, it's just amazing it did not blame us completely is my point.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 07:20 PM
8

That's a new one to me. LMAO
/r/MensRights12/06/26 07:15 PM
16

I was going to say that's nothing, they talk about feminist physics. But your article does go that far, in talking about feminist computer science. "Another course, called “Race, Gender, Class, and Computing,” examines “how identity impacts and is impacted by computing.” It will also explore “identity as a social construct” alongside technology development and its impact on different communities."
/r/MensRights12/06/26 03:52 AM
32

Reason #3 is about that.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 03:49 AM
26

Of course you don't. I edited that into the OP. And I'm sure you're not anti Mens rights at all. Probably just seems that way.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 03:21 AM
6

Can't have it both ways. Either women are adults and responsible for what they do, or they are not? Yeah, sure, that is a fallacy /s
/r/MensRights11/06/26 03:31 AM
11

Fine, have it your way. Women are not adults, and are responsible for nothing /s
/r/MensRights11/06/26 02:54 AM
30

You're falling into the feminist trap - thinking this is about who's "bad" and who's "good". Lord knows 90% of what feminism says is crap, but one thing feminists got right, is when they said it's all about power. Power imbalances are the real evil. I always like to say I wouldn't want to hang out with a man who had that much power over me either. It's like hanging out with your boss, very rarely does anybody want to do that. The problem is a woman can destroy your life with a false accusation. …
/r/MensRights11/06/26 02:41 AM
14

"Our women are mostly just pawns," They are adults. Nobody is making them do anything they don't want to do.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 02:33 AM
4

OH, sorry if I misunderstood then.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:27 PM
7

OMG, the people defending misandry in that OP!!! Repulsive.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:26 PM
6

Women can be sexist, and Black people can be racist. Obviously.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:23 PM
1

True. And women tear women apart too. But this was about double standards.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 05:54 PM
57

"because only the word of another woman can keep him out of jail." A long time ago, I heard someone say they testified the guy was innocent, but the police said another man's word meant nothing in that circumstance, had to be a woman. Don't recall the details. This might be the most misandric thing I've ever heard, and I've heard some amazing things.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:58 AM
17

Love when the Left, you know, the patriarchy, male-privilege crowd, pretends to care about men. To paraphrase that movie quote, I love the smell of desperation in the morning.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 01:53 AM
3

Of course women can tear men apart 24 hours a day, and it's crickets.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 07:54 PM
11

Maybe the nastiest thing I saw from kids was when I was in the 6th grade. There was a very obese boy. One time during gym class we all had to walk by the girls gym class in our gym shorts. What those girls did to that poor boy was horrible. About half of them jeered the poor boy as we walked by. A few of them actually charged to within a few feet of him as they pointed at, and jeered him. The gym teachers all saw this AND DID NOTHING. I'm nearing 70 now, and recall it vividly. I'll never forget …
/r/MensRights09/06/26 07:51 PM
1

This article was peer reviewed. Why not ask the mods if you can repost it if you include this citation? Moxon, S. (2024). FALSE RAPE REPORTS TO POLICE FORM A VERY LARGE PROPORTION OF CASES, AND THIS IS AMPLY EXPLAINED. New Male Studies, 13(2).
/r/MensRights09/06/26 07:38 PM
2

Here is the citation for this paper. I found this on Google Scholar. And a simple Google search says that New Male Studies is a peer reviewed journal. Moxon, S. (2024). FALSE RAPE REPORTS TO POLICE FORM A VERY LARGE PROPORTION OF CASES, AND THIS IS AMPLY EXPLAINED. New Male Studies, 13(2).
/r/MensRights09/06/26 07:32 PM
2

If you mean his use of English could use some improvement, then just say that, like I did. No need to be obnoxious about it.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:23 AM
11

The usual, outdoor jobs that my sister did not have to do.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:07 AM
5

Interesting. Not surprising when you think about it, but interesting.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:04 AM
2

I wouldn't care about unisex bathrooms either, IF WOMEN FACED THE SAME CONSEQUENCES FOR VIOLATING OUR PRIVACY AS WE DO IF WE VIOLATED THEIR'S. But of course, they do not. I saw a youtube video of a girl walking into the boys room while a boy was sitting on the bowl with the stall door closed. The video cut out just as she was jumping up and hanging onto the stall door to look at him on the bowl. If he did that to her, I don't know if she would have him arrested, but if she wanted to, she sure co…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 08:40 PM
3

That's half the story. A lot of white people have some kind of white guilt as well. I mean, there's straight white guys who vote Democrat now - the only way to explain that is a bizarre combination of male guilt and white guilt. One guy said he thinks the fundamental difference between the Left and the Right is Leftists are conformists. The TV tells them that whites are bad and males are bad. Being conformists they believe what the TV tells them, so they hate themselves, or, at the least, preten…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 07:45 PM
16

I know this study. Pretty well researched. But his grip on the English language could be better.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 07:28 PM
9

Seconded.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 01:54 AM
3

LMAO
/r/MensRights06/06/26 02:43 AM
0

The who have it easiest are the ones who are smart enough to realize having relationships with women is more trouble than it is worth.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 02:39 AM
5

You ignored this comment he made. Why? I have said it before and I will say it again, In my opinion most allegations of rape made to the Police in the UK are false. In the UK a woman can receive compensation from the Criminal injury board for even making a rape allegation. No conviction necessary. Total anonymity for the accuser but not for the accused. Unable to cross examine the accuser in court on many aspects of the incident. A false belief put out by the British government that women do not…
/r/MensRights06/06/26 02:37 AM
1

I used original sources. The bot was just to explain the contradictions. Aside from that, get used to it, AI is here.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 02:24 AM
14

Could not agree more.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 07:38 PM
8

Most US states do not allow lifetime alimony. I just put up an OP about this right now.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 07:14 PM
1

Ok, for the benefit of those who don't know this is based on a movie, which movie was it? There was a movie where you could only see the aliens if you wore special glasses. PS: just googled it. The movie was They Live.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 03:12 AM
2

Did you give them an earful? Everyone's got a boss, did you talk to her boss?
/r/MensRights05/06/26 03:06 AM
9

From your mouth to God's ears, as they say.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 03:03 AM
5

THIS^^^^
/r/MensRights05/06/26 02:48 AM
6

I apologize for taking you seriously. Feel free to troll on uninterrupted by me. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 06:09 PM
1

Well, there you go.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 02:48 AM
0

That's one thing I have never done. Maybe because I don't hang around women. Well, except relatives and coworkers.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 02:47 AM
0

Man, you are talking to some f%$king assholes. STOP THAT!
/r/MensRights04/06/26 02:41 AM
7

Keep posting, keep spreading the word.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 02:15 AM
10

My best friend was in a great marriage for 12 years. Then one day she woke up and hated him, for seemingly no reason.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 02:11 AM
2

I guess that explains it.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 02:07 AM
21

The best part of this is Eric is American. Why? Because I once read that, in European nations you can win such cases, but in America winning such cases is VERY difficult, almost impossible. So this is especially good news.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 07:45 PM
1

u/emo-ctrl 's response to you pretty much is my answer as well. Also, you miss the main point. It's got nothing to do with whether or not women are "bad" or "good", or how many fall into either category. It's about power imbalances. Lord knows feminism is mostly full of crap, but one thing it got right is, it's all about power. I wouldn't want to hang around a guy who had that much power over me either.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 07:17 PM
1

"It is true that women make up the majority of recorded victims," Every source I have seen says more women commit DV than men. EDIT: Unless by recorded victims you mean reported victims, but that's a garbage stat anyway.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:06 AM
1

The only thing we can do is try to educate people.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:04 AM
10

Of course, because the Democrats don't pander enough to women already. LMAO
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:01 AM
2

Some truth to that. 78% of partner killings are the man killing the woman. Of course, that means 22% are the woman killing the man. Of course about 75% of all murders are a man was murdered - funny how they just ignore that and focus on female safety though, isn't it?
/r/MensRights02/06/26 02:00 AM
4

Jesus Christ!
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:57 AM
3

In the USA it is. Women passed men in the 1980s, and the difference increases as time goes by.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:54 AM
1

Ok, no need to post the same OP twice, take this one down.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:51 AM
27

True. I would add the real solution is to avoid socializing with women. Simple as...
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:50 AM
10

The best way to fight feminism is to point that that feminism is sexist.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 02:33 AM
5

Hear, hear. I agree.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 08:59 PM
14

When it benefits women: "Men and women are different." When it benefits men: "You sexist pig!!! there NEVER IS ANY REASON TO TREAT MEN AND WOMEN DIFFERENTLY. Women should be allowed to go anywhere men can, even into men's locker rooms. Women can do any job men can, even if strength is a factor, like being a fireman, er, I mean fire person. Men and women are equal in EVERY WAY!!!!"
/r/MensRights31/05/26 08:56 PM
0

I don't care what women want or appreciate.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 01:38 AM
1

Well, you're in a field that is desperately aching for women.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 01:37 AM
1

I think avoiding women socially is the way to go. Now, at work, I can work with women just fine. I just avoid them socially. Nothing wrong with that. Having said that, are you separating from your mother? I have to admit, my mother was my closest friend. For most men I know of, their mother is the one woman they can count on. Of course, there are exceptions. This sub has enough OPs about abusive mothers.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 01:34 AM
4

Gee, everybody realized you were being sarcastic! I'm surprised. lol
/r/MensRights31/05/26 01:20 AM
1

In my opinion, we HAVE to choose a side. Permanent malaise would surely destroy us.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 01:18 AM
1

Yup. When you have a two-party system, like in the USA, it's always picking the lesser of two evils, isn't it?
/r/MensRights31/05/26 01:00 AM
1

I'll agree MOST off the times it is hard. The change for gays was mostly a one time thing. I know of no other group for whom attitudes changed that quickly. But that does NOT mean you give up on changing attitudes. You said "changing deeply held beliefs is almost impossible", and that kind of talk is defeatist and harmful. We can try to do two things at the same time, changing both laws and attitudes is the way to go.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 12:57 AM
1

On any given day you can find several OPs in this sub about such issues. Legal biases against men, societal attitudes that are biased against men, and so on.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:44 AM
6

"While those factors can matter, changing deeply held beliefs is almost impossible." Attitudes towards gays changed in a few short years COMPLETELY. It really was extraordinary how fast it changed.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:42 AM
1

"I don’t think today’s feminism is progressive," Oh, it's very progressive, that's the problem.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:39 AM
6

Even mods admit they have been banned for no reason from other subs.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:34 AM
-4

Same old BS. Yes, TRADITIONAL conservatives are bad for men. But what you libs always get wrong is those ARE NOT THE "TWO SIDES". Right now, the Left considers anyone not on the far Left as "conservative". If you think you can't change your gender every 5 minutes, the Left thinks you are a conservative. Which is pure bulls&t. So the two sides are not tradcons and liberals, the two sides are liberals who tote the straight identity politics Leftist line, and anyone who does not agree with it, incl…
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:32 AM
3

One particular aspect of this. Ever notice a son who inherits wealth and lives off of it is seen as worthless and corrupt, but a daughter who does same is seen as just deserving and lucky?
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:22 AM
65

Nothing new. The CIA keeps track of military age males in national populations. What do you think these nations fights years-long wars for? To reduce the enemy's fighting male population, so they are less of a threat. Yup, basically kill most of the young males who hate you in an effort to be safe. Ain't humanity great? LMAO
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:18 AM
2

Welcome to realizing the Leftist propaganda machine is a real thing. And, yes, it is a huge problem. Worst propaganda ever, thanks to our 24 hour a day communications world. Used to be when you closed the newspaper in the morning you left society's propaganda behind. Now people look at their phones all frigging day long.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:07 AM
2

"The result is that even when the party in power changes, institutions, courts and the media continue with the same policies." Very true, at least in the USA. But that's not due to feminism. Some people call that the "Deep State". Not too crazy about the phrase myself, sounds a little conspiracy theory. I just call it the bureaucracy. And for the most part, it is not affected by elections, which sucks pretty bad.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:02 AM
5

Generally women's sports do not let reporters into the locker room at all.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:38 AM
2

I'm well aware of this double standard. But the number of comments here from men who have experienced this is surprising to me. Glad I don't go to gyms. I exercise at home. Do crunches, push-ups and have dumb bells for curls, plus I have a spring gizmo for resistance. For aerobics I either jog outside or use my stationary bike. You don't really need a gym you know. And with these women barging into male locker rooms, no gym is better.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:22 AM
2

Not that I know of. Not that I'm some kind of Sabrina Carpenter expert. I know in her videos she abuses and kills men a lot.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:08 AM
2

Staying in miserable marriages is different than what I'm talking about. I will admit one thing - if a man today stood up to his wife the way men did back then, he would probably be seen as emotionally abusive.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:06 AM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:03 AM
16

Haven't you heard. When a woman does it, it's all about post-partum!!! Post-partum psychosis, post-partum-depression, post-partum bitchiness. OK, the last one I made up. What's so funny about that crap is it implies the women are mentally ill, AND THAT MEN WHO KILL THEIR OWN CHILDREN ARE NOT!!! As if normal fathers kill their children everyday. Ain't feminism great!!!! LMAO
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:41 PM
9

Why does everyone misspell matriarchy as "patriarchy"? I mean P and M are not even next to each other on the keyboard.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:37 PM
1

They don't. That is nature. It's societies issues that are discrimination. Nature gets a free pass to discriminate. Women bitching about periods makes about as much sense as men complaining about being vulnerable to testicle attacks.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:33 PM
2

THIS^^^
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:28 PM
1

For the most part, I agree. I think the men these days that avoid marriage and dating women and sex are plenty strong now. But the fact is, that's a minority of men. I think the rest are emotionally and psychologically weak. I just don't see the men of yore putting up with all of the sh$t men today put up with and continuing to pursue women.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:27 PM
2

This is not about physical strength.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:22 PM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:18 PM
2

Also, remember, you can find the original in LeftWingMaleAdvocates about 3 or 4 days ago.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:16 PM
1

NOTE TO EVERYONE WHO CAME HERE TO SEE THE OP - REMEMBER, THIS WAS POSTED IN LeftWingMaleAdvocates ABOUT 3 OR 4 DAYS AGO - YOU CAN FIND IT THERE!!!
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:14 PM
2

Very good question. If you look under the OP, you'll see a suggestion that this be posted to a sub that is a "better fit". (Although it might be only I, as the OP, can see this, can you see it?) I messaged the mods last night contesting that assertion, so far no answer. At the moment that is all I know.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 06:11 PM
1

Matriarchy.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 03:00 AM
5

Concise and accurate.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 02:51 AM
17

When asked about her songwriting hack, Sabrina Carpenter recommended adding weird chord progressions and simply "calling men stupid in as many ways as you can".
/r/MensRights27/05/26 02:47 AM
6

Most pop music is by women now, just FYI. Just more male musicians would be nice actually.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 02:44 AM
3

Ditto!
/r/MensRights27/05/26 02:43 AM
2

OK, I edited that sentence as "But don't let anyone convince you this is correct, in which case you might erroneously think earlier reports of far more male victimization are wrong."
/r/MensRights26/05/26 12:57 AM
1

I re-read the OP, and I think I see the source of your stupidity. You read "so the earlier reports of far more male victimization are wrong." out of context. If you had read the whole sentence which was "But don't let anyone convince you this is correct, so the earlier reports of far more male victimization are wrong." you should have realized I meant "But don't let anyone convince you this is correct, so that you think earlier reports of far more male victimization are wrong." OK, I appreciate …
/r/MensRights26/05/26 12:55 AM
2

Ok, if you actually read my OP, you'd realize that my point is the 2023/24 report is undercounting male victims. But more important to me than the fact your reading skills suck, is why exactly do you think I'm anti-male? Because there might be other simpletons who are misreading the OP just like you are. So, what makes you think I'm a killallmen apologist?
/r/MensRights26/05/26 12:49 AM
1

Your comment here deserves more attention. I think this sentence probably explains everything. From the methodolgy report: The question format was revised to ask whether the participant experienced the behavior (with yes/no response options) instead of asking how many people (ever) committed the behavior against the respondent, as was done in previous survey versions. If you ask a man if he was forced to penetrate someone, he will say no. But if you describe the activity, then you might get the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 02:06 AM
1

Could you please give me links to the questionnaires for each of the years you do have the CDC reports? Thank you in advance for your help.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 01:58 AM
3

Not a bad idea here.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 01:27 AM
13

Record everything, then look into suing for harassment/discrimination. If you need help with the recording, hire a private eye.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 01:25 AM
1

Also, what are the "There are well understood reasons why "lifetime" rape figures and 12 month annual rape figures disagree."? I know about how memory fades faster when the perpetrator is female, as explained in Ahola, but I'm wondering if you have other reasons you have that I might not know about.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 09:42 PM
1

I'm surprised some feminists tried to make the def of rape less biased. In Israel, India and one other country they tried to keep the sexist def of rape. By there is something more important in this wonderful comment of yours. You talk about how they changed the wording of questions after 2012, I REALLY need to know about this. PLEASE send me whatever citations you have on this. In the comment below, you said "The CDC created new category classifications to make things like a guy on a date getti…
/r/MensRights24/05/26 09:29 PM
1

Either you're an idiot or you don't know what pedantic means. It does not mean that you were wrong, it just means pedantic - look it up FFS. And since your reading skills are apparently crap, I'll make it easier for, just focus on this sentence. "Language evolves organically, and many recent additions to the lexicon—as well as older, resurrected words—are now used in ways that completely contradict their original or dictionary definitions." And whether or not you're just stupid or are simply tro…
/r/MensRights24/05/26 03:50 AM
6

F&5k other people, respect yourself. Know your self worth. Carry yourself with self respect. CONFIDENCE!
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:42 AM
5

"Women can freely dress and choose any style, yet men often get mocked just for favoring pink and soft styles." Generalizing this - women have been liberated from gender expectations, men have not.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:38 AM
1

Came here to make comments - saw all of my points were already made. Kudos fellas.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:36 AM
0

WOW, that chart.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:35 AM
1

I think this is a great comment.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:33 AM
2

I feel like this just touches on the key aspect of the problem. Girls who are bullied get humiliated, Boys, minimally get humiliated, but run the risk of getting beaten up, sometimes even killed. It's a horse of an entirely different color if your actual safety is at risk. All the more so, if you're a small guy like me. Male disposability at its worst.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:25 AM
5

I always like to drop this tidbit in when this discussion pops up. Yeah, for the d&%kheads in the crowd, I'm sure most of the staff is female, changes nothing. 9,000 kids in group homes were surveyed, 10% were sexually abused by staff, 92% said the abuser was female. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/723250-sexual-victimization-in-juvenile-facilities-2008.html
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:17 AM
9

"Many women don’t actually like men very much." Pretty much sums it up succinctly.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:13 AM
1

It might not be deep or amazing, but it is pedantic. I will admit you made me look into this now. And yes, your distinction is just that - pedantic. What I just read about radical feminism is what most people think of as just "feminism". OK, so when most people say feminism they are referring to what some call "radical feminism". Was I wrong? No. You are not wrong when you use words with their common usage. If I may use your favorite source, Google AI Language evolves organically, and many recen…
/r/MensRights24/05/26 02:04 AM
2

Suuure. They were just a tiny bit upset about losing a game, so they lost a draft pick and got fined hundreds of thousands of dollars. So, I take it you think this is the first time they ever lost a game??? Your position is an indefensible joke.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 04:48 AM
1

Radical means root, based in Latin? Funnily enough that is exactly what Google AI says when you ask it about radical feminism. So, you used AI, oooooh, I'm so impressed. I care even less what AI thinks about defining radical feminism than what the dictionary says. Look Einstein, you want to impress people by using AI, have at it. When people talk about radical feminism in every day usage, they mean radical as extremist. So not interested in your intellectual pretenses.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:49 AM
2

About that sexist definition of rape. One of the Honey Badgers, it might have been Hannah, asked the CDC researchers why they used that definition of rape. She said he had no idea why that definition was used. Not surprising when you think about it. It was probably done by politicians.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:29 AM
1

Yeah, I mean how can this be referring to feminism? associated with political views, practices, and policies of extreme change OK, enough of your trolling, I gave you too much of my attention. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:21 AM
1

But what radical feminism really means, is hatred of men.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:11 AM
1

You're the one who has no idea what he is talking about. The word "radical" has lots of meanings. In this context, according to Mirriam Webster, radical means : very different from the usual or traditional : extreme : favoring extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions : associated with political views, practices, and policies of extreme change
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:10 AM
1

If you're talking about some dictionary definition of radical feminism, you can jam it. I mean the dictionary defines feminism this way Feminism is a social, political, and ideological movement dedicated to achieving full social, economic, and political equality for all genders. And that is about as close to reality as the Easter bunny. The Cambridge dictionary defines radical feminism as the belief that there should be a big change in society so that men no longer have power over women, or acti…
/r/MensRights23/05/26 02:52 AM
2

For an alchemist you don't seem to think your positions out very well.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 02:42 AM
2

So, men don't mind at all, huh. Then why did that hockey team risk fines and draft picks to keep the press out of their locker room? According to you, they had no reason whatsoever to do that. Yet they deliberately violated league rules in such a way they got fined hundreds of thousand of dollars. And according to you they did this for no reason at all.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 02:39 AM
1

You gotta be kidding. LMAO
/r/MensRights23/05/26 02:34 AM
2

If you go to the link I gave you for that movie, then click on the link within that OP, it will take you to the Wikipedia article on the movie, which is quite extensive. Tells you a lot about it.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:41 AM
5

You could argue Western society is now matriarchal. First thing that came to my mind though is the Bonobos monkeys. Something tells me nobody except radical feminists would call Bonobos society "good'. LMAO
/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:31 AM
32

"There's nothing wrong with having a target audience. It's going to have mainly male characters in important roles because it's catering to its target audience." BINGO!
/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:26 AM
2

Uh, a lot of men DO want to. Pretty sure just about all of the athletes would appreciate some privacy and peace and quiet after the game, but, for some reason, nobody listens to what men want.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:21 AM
2

Good point. It was probably the first movie to show women raping men. That I know of anyway.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:18 AM
2

Well, it was not seen that way, he succeeded. Like I said in my post, it was the 18th largest box office hit of 1969.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:52 PM
2

Men tried that for decades, got us nowhere. You want to take that path, have at it, it's your time to waste.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:50 PM
2

Of course it was. The director was worried about it being seen as a porn movie. I mean they were showing women raping men IN 1968!!!!
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:46 PM
3

Yeah, in 1968 too!!!!
/r/MensRights21/05/26 07:05 PM
3

Three in the Attic was pretty creepy too.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:59 PM
0

WHOOOSH - RIGHT OVER YOUR HEAD. Come on man, try some actual thinking. If you had read the damn comic you would've seen he tells about how, if that actually happened, pretty much the entire world's population would die within days, or was it hours. Then again, if your brain is used that little, you probably can't wake it up now.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:57 PM
3

Thank you.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:54 PM
5

Here's a good example I posted about a few days ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1t33koh/was_1968_this_misandric/ I also have this ) I just came across a good sign for men, a sign of some attention being given to male rape victims. Prior to a day or so ago, only once or twice have I seen a fictional story in which a woman rapes a man. (One time in an old police show, might've been Hill Street Blues. Another time is so vague in my memory, I'm not sure it happened.) But just recen…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:43 PM
2

Partly biology, but also partly brainwashing. Men are raised to believe they are not real men unless they are willing to have sex with every willing woman.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:33 PM
2

If you want to experience that, just try posting about men following their own path - you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:31 PM
4

Funny, I give men the same advice.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:29 PM
41

His wife never made a statement to defend him? Time for a divorce.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:28 PM
6

Disgusting video.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:25 PM
3

I think I've only seen a man being raped by a woman a few times on TV.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:21 PM
-1

Here's one thing to consider. How badly would many men act if they had the kind of power women had? Men would act a lot worse then they do now, that is for sure.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:19 PM
1

I just dropped the comment that you can fit the world's population in Rhode Island. lol
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:16 PM
0

FUN FACT for those who complain about over population - according to xkcd, you can actually fit the ENTIRE WORLD'S POPULATION IN RHODE ISLAND. Also, I ran the calculation once myself a long time ago. If I remember correctly, you can fit a lot more than the world's population in Rhode Island. Here is the link to where xkcd says this https://what-if.xkcd.com/8/
/r/MensRights21/05/26 06:14 PM
1

Not relevant at all, but OK.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:42 AM
2

Criminals go to jail dude. There is no exemptions in the USA. Maybe in England, because the UK is really f&%ked up.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 09:37 PM
13

Kudos dude, good luck with the lawyers.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:55 PM
2

I don't know about cameras, but overall this is a big problem. I went back to my old high school decades after graduating, and I found one change hard to believe. They had removed the doors from the boy's restrooms. And these restrooms were built so that, if you walked by them in the middle of the hall and just looked sideways, EVERY GIRL could get a good view of the urinals. You could literally see guys peeing at the urinals from behind from the outside hallway. Of course the girl's restrooms s…
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:51 PM
2

Wow, crappy reading skills dude. Sue your English teacher. I said "Many men ACT like they don't care..." If you really don't know what the word "many" means then maybe you should not be commenting on English chat sites. In fact, you said "most". If you had a better understanding of English, you would realize "most" is much stronger than "many". You came closer to asserting you can read the minds of all men than I did. Most means more than 50%, whereas "many" can mean any large number of men.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:33 PM
6

Good point. On the other hand, the study said "Forecasters further failed to anticipate that discrimination against male candidates for stereotypically female jobs would remain stable across the decades." So, my "even back then" still holds to some degree.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:26 PM
2

So you want pregnant murderers to get 9 months to escape to a country that has no extradition treaty with us? Not seeing that as all that different.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:20 PM
4

Of course. But women don't have any such contract, so neither should the men.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 07:16 PM
8

"For example, we can't sentence a woman to prison while she's pregnant." So, you're all for letting pregnant women kill people for free? Good to know. I disagree. Having said that, I agree there are some cases where it is a close call. But who cares? Worrying about that is making a mountain out of a molehill. Don't seat the small stuff is the answer to that point.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:38 AM
15

Well, if men get long jail sentences for raping women, but women don't even get arrested for raping adult men, that would be an example if a bias against men by society. Same holds to a slightly lesser extent for domestic violence. How you achieve unbiasedness in viewing society is by being fair, generally achieved by treating people equally. If you reverse the identities of those involved, would the treatment be the same.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 01:39 AM
11

Some of that is plain old chivalry. But some of it is a consequence of the culture war. Lately things have gotten worse for men because men vote Populist too much. Women and minorities are defending the Establishment, so the Establishment returns the favor.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 01:33 AM
39

Even back then.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 01:28 AM
3

Differing Media Policies Across Leagues While the four major North American men's leagues (NHL, NBA, NFL, MLB) have historically maintained open-door locker room access for credentialed journalists, women's professional sports leagues operate under entirely different media frameworks: [1, 2, 3] The WNBA Model: In the WNBA, the league and its players' union restructured their policy to protect player privacy. Instead of letting reporters walk among players while they change or shower, teams bring…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:55 PM
2

Lots of women think a man they don't know saying "hello" is harassment.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:44 PM
6

I've found women in a public men's bathroom 6 or 7 times in my life. And none of them was with long lines at the women's restroom by the way.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:40 PM
2

Grotesque story dude.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:38 PM
16

"Also recently, a NHL team didn’t let the media in the locker room after a game. They were fined hundreds of thousands of dollars and lost at least one draft pick next year." To me, this was the worst part of what you said. I knew about the rest, but this was new to me. And what pisses me off so much about that, is that is how women's sports handles the issue, at least how women's tennis handles it from what I heard. Women's tennis does not let the media in until the women are all showered and d…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:36 PM
12

Many men ACT like they don't care because they know they will get made fun of if they create a fuss about it. That's not the same as men actually not caring about it.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:31 PM
7

"This story is about Sexual harrassment, not a modesty problem." BULLSEYE!!!!
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:30 PM
3

Dude, your mom hits you with rolling pins whenever she loses to you in an argument? In case you don't realize it, that's "domestic violence". You need to do something about that. Have you spoken to her about it?
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:25 PM
6

Very touching OP.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 01:46 AM
8

Kind of funny actually.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 08:53 PM
2

lol
/r/MensRights18/05/26 08:49 PM
2

Yeah, poverty is no fun.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 08:47 PM
1

So sorry to hear about what you went through. The guy below said male vets are wanted in Australia?
/r/MensRights18/05/26 02:16 AM
23

Dropping out of marriage is fine and smart, but why drop out of work? How is self destruction smart? Make the money, just spend it on yourself is the way to go.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 02:02 AM
8

Yup, just about sums it up.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 01:57 AM
1

Here's an article about 15 common signs of an abusive relationship. https://www.prevention.com/life/a41405111/red-flags-in-relationship/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=mgu_ga_pre_d_bm_prog_org_us_a41405111&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=18503525409&gbraid=0AAAAADA2LlJ34UmAdljDU_Th_pCLKUP0R&gclid=CjwKCAjwq6DQBhBVEiwA4ZD5XMlU62-A_rvGb3YRynwv_KvqHBPVrT06WLWDDjY25qTNkhbgG0SvCxoC8lQQAvD_BwE These are things a lot of women do. Just to pick one example we have all heard of - telling your pa…
/r/MensRights17/05/26 02:59 AM
10

That video is disgusting. You should put up an OP about that video.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 02:54 AM
14

"Are they being protected to keep the anti-male agenda going?" In a word, yes.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 02:36 AM
5

Well said.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 02:35 AM
-7

Yes, men have it a lot worse than women do. Personally I would not go about this by talking about men who wish they were born women though. I mean, I get your point, but still strikes me as odd. Just point out the injustices.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 02:31 AM
1

There is certainly a lot of hatred of men online. Having said that, I don't care about your example. I don't care about men who complain about not getting women. Personally I think such men are lucky. Also, not sure what that has to do with mens rights.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 02:26 AM
1

Well, of course. I mean going back to gender, the status of men and women differs a lot between the Middle East and the USA.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 02:04 AM
2

Good luck my friend.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 02:01 AM
14

Agreed.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 02:20 AM
1

Sounds good to me.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 02:19 AM
78

A lot of that is something men should even OUTSIDE the work place too. And they should start that at a young age too. Tell tour sons this.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 02:13 AM
2

"As once said, only children, dogs, and women are loved unconditionally." I think it went like this - children only really love pets and women only really love children. The implication being, who's left to really love men? Nobody, that's who.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:59 PM
1

I don't think that contradicts what I said at all. Marxism looks to expand. More than anything else, Socialists want power. That's the only thing they care about. If not, then why are they so happy to abandon the class bit in the USA?
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:53 PM
219

And also teach them to be careful not to be sexually taken advantage of by girls. Just like we teach girls not to be taken advantage of by boys.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:48 PM
1

Yeah, I know there's all kind of crap data saying this or that about strength. None of which means anything. I mean there's measures of muscle mass too that also mean nothing. In any case, just read my comment more carefully. I said there's no reliable data to measure this, so giving a specific data point is pointless, thus me giving my range. Yet you glommed onto the 20% figure despite the fact I did not endorse it at all because you are looking for an argument. Sorry, not interested. Play keyb…
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:45 PM
0

So, you think with DEI whites still have an advantage? I've heard black people say they were DEI'd out, that you can't even be white any more.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 02:42 AM
0

Cool, so you're admitting that Marxism is a grift. Just your standard divide and conquer strategy. In Russia it was class based, but that doesn't work in the USA, so it switched to race and gender. Same grift, just with a twist. Just a parasitical ideology looking to destroy its host.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 02:40 AM
2

Good advice here.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 02:31 AM
3

THIS^^^
/r/MensRights14/05/26 02:29 AM
3

Yeah, you should complain about this.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 02:29 AM
5

You should complain about this. That is harassment and intimidation.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 02:27 AM
0

Depends on the female. Some have some power.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 02:26 AM
0

A long time ago I read in a magazine that 20% of wives are physically stronger than their husbands. Mind you, no source was cited for this tidbit, so it might have been nothing more than an expert opinion. Having said that, I think 20% sounds reasonable to me. Thought I prefer giving a range more than a specific number, like between 10% and 30%, because there is no reliable data to base this on.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 02:25 AM
61

Keep in mind, if 94% were going to men, this would be a world-ending disaster according the media. But as is, just crickets.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 01:36 AM
14

Great video to present to the normies. MRAs know this stuff already, but good for everyone else.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 01:33 AM
1

???? for real
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:09 AM
-4

Bravo for her.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:08 AM
0

Yeah, they do that all of the time.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:07 AM
6

Yeah, lets be good little victims and not talk about how men are oppressed. After, that's worked so well so far. LMAO
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:06 AM
1

Thank you for your response.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:03 AM
8

I'll give you credit for at least having an intelligent tone here, but some of your comments are still sexist. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/25/male-circumcision-ceremonies-death-deformity-africa Quote from the article: "Deaths commonly occur through dehydration, blood loss, shock-induced heart failure or septicaemia. And there are estimated to be two total penile amputations for every death. Countless numbers of participants are left with permanent scarring or deformity. Uro…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 03:01 AM
1

We need another saying to replace "in other news, water is wet". Anybody got any ideas? How about, "hey, you see the latest headline? The Earth is round!!!".
/r/MensRights12/05/26 01:48 AM
8

fgm is mostly in third world countries, so if you're going to compare fgm to mgm you should only compare fgm to third world mgm, in which case they are far more comparable. Not that I expect a sexist ass like you to be fair mind you, but... Just FYI, female rapists are FAR more likely to get away with it than male rapists.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 01:39 AM
-3

Our Western culture war has to be settled. If the Left wins the world will go Communist. If not, then Western individualism will win the day. My money is on Western individualism, not a 100% sure thing though. I know you said gender war, but right now that's just a subset of the overall culture war. The two feed off of each other.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 01:33 AM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 01:41 AM
1

We should avoid the situation feminism and the Left want. Where fewer women in college = discrimination, but fewer men in college = no problem. As u/63daddy said below, males can be dissuaded from education by discrimination just like females can be.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 01:40 AM
3

Great post.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 01:35 AM
1

I gave him a reply on how feminism and Marxism are linked.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 01:30 AM
1

Feminism has an established link to Marxism. When I asked Google AI how is feminism linked to Marxism I got this. Feminism and Marxism are linked primarily through Marxist Feminism, a theoretical framework that identifies capitalism as the fundamental driver of female oppression. While traditional Marxism focuses on class struggle, this variant extends those concepts to address domestic labor and gender relations. [1, 2, 3]
/r/MensRights11/05/26 01:29 AM
1

I would think so.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 01:23 AM
23

Before I found this place, I used to hang out in the chats in youtube that were under videos by MRAs. Karen Straughan, the Honey Badgers, and about 5 or 6 others whose names I do not recall.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 01:09 AM
5

Yup, those models.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 03:57 AM
10

I've never heard it applied to big breasts. I've heard it applied to model standards. You know, thin, waif-like, no boobs. That's the pedophile thing, supposedly anyway.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 01:52 AM
1

I know that's how domestic violence is enforced, but were you accused specifically of "coercive control"?
/r/MensRights10/05/26 01:36 AM
0

Good point.
/r/MensRights10/05/26 01:34 AM
4

THIS^^^
/r/MensRights09/05/26 04:14 AM
2

Ah yes. Affirmative Action, so called reverse discrimination (which is just discrimination), and so on. The cure is obvious, stop voting Leftist. Even worse now with DEI. F&%k the Left.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 04:14 AM
1

By the way, when it's your sibling, just curious, what happens if you fight back? I know many males are not verbally adept. I happen to be, so I have no trouble standing up to belligerent females. Now if it's your mother, that's different, too much of a power imbalance.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 04:07 AM
2

There are lots of laws protecting men. The thing is they are usually only enforced if the victim is female. The problem is the one you report here, male victims are seldom believed. There is something you can do, but most males in your situation don't have the nerve to do it. GET PROOF. Get a concealed camera or recorder and record or tape the abuse when it happens. Show to those asshole gaslighters. If necessary report it to the police. If you are not technically savvy enough to pull this off, …
/r/MensRights09/05/26 04:00 AM
1

This is a great article. It seems to be British based. Am I being naive in hoping this kind of legislation is not happening in the USA?
/r/MensRights09/05/26 03:48 AM
6

Paywall.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 03:29 AM
39

You forgot men are expected to pay her way on dates.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 03:24 AM
2

I applaud the effort.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 03:20 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 03:17 AM
6

I'm sorry. I was not aware I was addressing someone so sensitive that pointing out you misread the OP was being "rude". As it turns out, just today there was another OP in this sub that shows how HR decides which complaints get taken seriously, and which do not. And guess what? This often determines who gets fired. Here's that other OP https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1t6sa67/a_story_of_two_hr_complaints/ Now, hopefully I was not "rude" enough to hurt your delicate fee fees.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:41 AM
3

There are not two ideologies, "progressive" and "traditional" simpleton. There's progressive, read Leftist wackaloons, there's centrist non-ideological (whom the progressives label as right wing, because they are not crazy enough to suit the Leftists), there's center-right (patriotic, but not traditional), and there's traditional. And if I thought about it for a few more minutes I could probably come up with a few more classes too. You are falling victim to the divide & conquer of the progressiv…
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:15 AM
4

The OP did not say that HR chooses who gets hired genius. They said "They choose to gradually replace everyone with women" which could mean they are getting rid of the men in the office. Keep getting rid of the men, and guess what? You end up with all women. Even if you have no say in who gets hired.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:06 AM
87

We HAVE to make HRs less female dominated. This HAS to be a cause.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 01:58 AM
1

I don't go near as far as you, but I basically do that.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 03:06 AM
1

Don't self delete. Just delete women from your life and live your best life FOR YOU.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 03:04 AM
6

The political Left brainwashes us all into believing women are oppressed to keep women angry, so they will vote Democrat.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 03:00 AM
2

Just remember guys, that cute woman you want to ask out, might just be like this woman. Makes you think, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 02:57 AM
6

Did you complain to the store manager?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 02:53 AM
19

This is like a bad dream. FFS
/r/MensRights07/05/26 02:37 AM
43

It's only bad when it happens to women /s
/r/MensRights06/05/26 01:56 AM
3

WTF is all that about phones in lockers???
/r/MensRights06/05/26 01:53 AM
5

In a word, yes. I mean female on male rape is not taken seriously unless she's a teacher and he is underage, so why would sexual harassment be taken seriously?
/r/MensRights06/05/26 01:47 AM
8

Seriously? How can guys who frequent things like this sub not know that women rape men in large numbers? Are you a newbie?
/r/MensRights06/05/26 01:46 AM
9

I like that. I might use it some day.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 01:42 AM
1

Look up the term incel. And don't use words you do not know the meaning of. With people like you lurking around, sometimes it has its problems.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 01:33 AM
1

Yeah, that makes sense.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 03:29 AM
2

"she’s stalked another worker in a different location in the park." OK, that does not sound good.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 03:11 AM
1

My take from your description is she doesn't sound like the female psycho type. Of course, women change sometimes...
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:37 AM
1

lol so am I. As time goes by, the probability of that happening will go down.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:33 AM
10

Man here. I cry at movies, among other places.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:31 AM
2

I don't participate in group dynamics like you do, so maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. But my advice would be to move on, hang out with another group. Cut ties with that bunch.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:26 AM
1

You know, that's downright quaint compared to what women say now. I mean "killallmen", and all men are rapists, and so on. If the only thing women did was say men are pigs I could very easily live with that.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:11 AM
3

Paglia has said some things that really back up men's rights. Can you show me some examples of her exaggerating how dangerous men are?
/r/MensRights03/05/26 09:26 PM
3

Much safer to avoid having anything to do with women.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 03:09 AM
37

England is hopeless.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 02:57 AM
6

Well said.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 02:56 AM
5

"Some journalist may choose to hide it, that's there personal decision, some others will choose to include it, that's also their personal decision." You do realize that is you agreeing with me, right?
/r/MensRights02/05/26 04:34 AM
34

You must be joking. I've seen cases where a woman sexually assaulted (even raped) a man and her identity was kept secret while his was made public. LMAO Here's one such case. KARACHI: Karachi police have registered a case against three unidentified women who allegedly abducted a man and raped him over four consecutive days, and later throwing him near Qayyumabad River in an unconscious state. The victim identified as Khalil, 23, works as a waiter at a restaurant. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 03:28 AM
11

Lots of times journalists keep an identity secret when they could legally print it.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 03:21 AM
2

Welcome friend :)
/r/MensRights30/04/26 06:10 PM
2

Christ some of the posts you see in this sub are hard to read.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 06:08 PM
2

"Some women have always known: men mutate into monsters! Even the sight of a naked female calf causes young boys to twitch in convulsive excitement, be infested within seconds by animal hair growth and die shortly afterwards with an erect penis. Doctors face a mystery, only note that this disease only swepts men with high testosterone levels." This has got to be satire - I hope.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 06:05 PM
2

To be honest this has so few details and is poorly written. I actually have no idea what she said or did to you. Maybe try reposting with a better description?
/r/MensRights30/04/26 05:58 PM
9

So, you suggesting Communism? lol
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:16 AM
1

Too many men do that, yes.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:10 AM
24

Jesus Mary and Joseph - FUCKING HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights29/04/26 02:13 AM
6

Well, if you're of a mind, you could make trouble for them with a lawyer. I mean they have zero evidence. Anonymous social media accusations? LMAO
/r/MensRights29/04/26 02:11 AM
3

No, it does not. This is one way I differ from most MRAs. Most seem to think Chad has it easy. They don't seem to realize that dating a bunch of women is no blessing. Why do you think so many men went their own way?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 02:07 AM
12

Boys let down by the Establishment/Leftists* There, fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:27 PM
1

Don't ignore it. Someone in that room at the time had to notice you did not stare at her. Ask some people who were there if they noticed. Best if it's a girl. Then ask them to stick up for you.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:25 PM
17

BINGO! Even rape.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:21 PM
4

Because more women vote than men, and they vote for women's issues, unlike men.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:20 PM
1

Generally this is true of the Left, and women, on the whole are more Leftist than men.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:22 AM
1

I think what you have here is excellent. I can't think of anything to change right now.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:21 AM
9

You don't say whether or not you have brought this to the attention of any authorities. If you have not done so, then please try that. Also, try to document all of what is being done to you, and present it to said authorities.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:13 AM
10

THIS^^^^
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:09 AM
1

No problem.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:01 AM
1

Thumbs up.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 03:00 AM
8

Who cares? I consider that a favor anyway. We're better off without them the way things are now.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:30 AM
2

I'm not sure I know how. I seem to recall once I posted the url of a Pinterest pic, and I think the pic showed up in the OP. I could be wrong though.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:27 AM
4

True, but the reason it's worse now is the culture war. Men vote Populist too much.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 01:25 AM
1

I'd be fine with that, but there are people who the minute I say I used AI just gag.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 09:20 PM
1

Isn't there a sub called Are we dating the same guy is toxic AWDTSGisToxic?
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:22 AM
-8

OK.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:19 AM
0

Paywall.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:18 AM
7

Less than 20 years for being involved in at least 40 homicides. LMAO But, but, but I thought we lived in a patriarchy??? LMAO
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:17 AM
3

Buffy the Vampire Slayer - so many virtuous girl heroes. Even the male heros are sometimes mass murderers, for the most part. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1sq6ewb/buffy_the_vampire_slayer_was_misandric_reason_2/
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:42 AM
2

Our mods are scared to death of the sub being deleted. I think whenever feminists gripe about a post they really don't like, the mods come up with some reason to take it down.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:35 AM
1

Not just our mods who act like that, seems to be a reddit wide thing.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:34 AM
2

There is some truth to that.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:32 AM
4

This is a troll - do not engage.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:27 AM
2

AI is not useless. Yeah, I know some people gag at the thought of AI, and I do not use it much myself. But it has it purposes.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:25 AM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:20 AM
78

It does exist, FOR MEN. Men live in rape culture, in that the rape of men is tolerated and joked about, and is almost never punished.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 02:04 AM
1

You are welcome.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:58 AM
1

You MUST live in a city.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:54 AM
2

You should include all of the warnings we teach girls. Women rape men often enough. Men should start using the same strategies women use to avoid victimization. Don't get so drunk that you lose situational awareness. Generally avoiding getting drunk is a good idea. Avoid being alone with females in social situations. Especially if she's interested in you. Avoid spending lots of time with any woman who is interested in you. Don't worry about seeming rude, you are protecting yourself. There are lo…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 04:19 AM
4

Nauseating.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 03:59 AM
2

THIS^^^
/r/MensRights23/04/26 03:52 AM
2

THIS^^^
/r/MensRights23/04/26 03:45 AM
9

As I said in the edit, if you live in a city, or if you're talking about kids who are not your neighbors, I can see that. But in this situation, most kids say hi back if you say hi.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 04:11 AM
11

Yes. Hey look, you want to just play keyboard warrior and argue just to argue, then have fun. I'm not here to flame people, but have at it if you want, but I'm done replying to you. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:51 AM
2

I added an EDIT #2 to the OP to address this issue. Maybe clarifies things?
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:46 AM
10

Do you live in a city?
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:41 AM
18

For what it's worth, even most kids here do say hi. It might have something to do with just leaving the bus stop is my guess. But that's just my guess.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:39 AM
15

Actually, they are my neighbors. This was in our complex, so everyone there lives in the complex. Apparently you live in a very rude area. I this complex, certainly almost all adults say hi to each other, whether we know each other or not.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:36 AM
20

I did not pass by any boys you dumbf%$k. Who said I was ignoring boys? Just you and your stupid assumptions, that's who. You probably have no idea how much you proved my point. I'm sorry, I didn't know saying "hi" was being predatory. To me, walking by someone you see coming from 20 yards away and pretending you do not see each other is what's weird. The point of saying Hi is supposed to alleviate the awkwardness of walking by someone and ignoring them. In case you did not know.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:33 AM
12

Almost 70. I added that tidbit as an edit to the OP.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:24 AM
1

Yeah, again not debating that, we're debating if they get blowback when they do it. I mean I get attacked too, but there is usually blowback.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:02 AM
-1

I have only seen that a few times, just in a few OPs. There are a small number of OPs here that seem to have only toll comments in them. But that happens less than once a week. If you're claiming it is common, then I don't know what you are talking about.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 07:07 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights21/04/26 06:59 PM
47

Yeah, I saw that comment too.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:50 AM
74

Misogynistic? Don't you mean misandric? Those girls were having fun.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 04:25 AM
2

Don't let those clowns get you down my friend.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:46 AM
1

Which does not contradict anything I said. Please read my comment again, more carefully. "Yeah, we get some trolls, but here they generally get a verbal beat down."
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:45 AM
3

Men need to learn not to marry.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:42 AM
2

Great article. A short while ago I made an OP about how Joan Jett's "I love Rock & Roll" sexualizes a 17 year old boy she just met.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:27 AM
2

Those people here making fun of this OP have the intelligence of an egg plant. You really think women having this attitude towards males is not what drives radical feminism? You think this is not what drives false rape allegations and false DV allegations? Or this is not why women laugh when they hear how some woman cut off her husband's penis? Or why women think it's OK to use men for money and divorce rape him?
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:22 AM
4

I'm a limited gender separatist, so fine by me. Women leaving men alone is better for men.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:18 AM
2

I agree with you generally, but not about this sub. Yeah, we get some trolls, but here they generally get a verbal beat down.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:16 AM
1

I remembered him after I googled it, but not before.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:05 AM
1

???
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:04 AM
1

Giving Lesbians the love, but ignoring gay men? See it now? Anyway, getting late here, gotta leave in a few minutes.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 03:07 AM
1

That's why it was such a big deal, it was unusual back then.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:59 AM
2

Oh, go ahead, pick on my abbreviation. LMAO political correctness - bah humbug!!!
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:52 AM
2

Oh, OK. You have a better point with that one. There were only two lesbians. But it's all the attention they got that made it seem so lopsided. And the way the show cheered the two lesbos on was pretty obvious. Remember Dawn being giddy about two girls getting it on in her house?
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:47 AM
1

You have a decent argument with the neck snap. Although is that torture, or just a quick kill? Still, not a bad point. As for Angel torturing Dru, was that shown or just described? As I recall, I think it was just described. If so, not the same thing. The Buffy rape thing? Actually, that's piddling compared to how Buffy beat Spike like a drum during their whole relationship. I mean the show made a running joke about how he only liked her because of how she beat him. Remember she accused him of o…
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:43 AM
2

The turok han or Uber Vamp (had to look that up) beat Buffy like a drum, but that's not torture as best as I recall. If I'm forgetting something, let me know. Regarding Drusilla/Angel, you have maybe half a point. As I recall, you did not see him torture her. Wasn't it just said that he did that? Unless I'm mistaken. I clearly said in the OP I talked about GRAPHIC torture. How can it be graphic if you only hear a verbal description of it? And again I said "But you never saw a boy walk up to a gi…
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:35 AM
6

This could be worded a lot better, not sure what you mean. But these days almost all of it is women just denying men a space to relax and be themselves.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:09 AM
4

So stop dating them.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:04 AM
3

You're very welcome.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:02 AM
19

Great article, but the Leftist mainstream media will ignore it.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 02:00 AM
8

Good for you, and great you got positive feedback. I do have one suggestion. Stop worrying about which sex is most often sexually victimized. One way to handle that is to say the number of each sex victimized is "comparable" or "about the same". That gets the point across that men are victimized a lot more than people think. But it also makes it less of a horse race, you're not picking a winner, so less likely to draw arguments.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 01:53 AM
1

Just curious, are you self-filtering when you count 8? Like when I counted 3, I was not including the time a female friend groped me. Technically that is sexual assault, but she was a friend who I knew who had a crush on me, so I viewed it as no big deal.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 11:03 PM
11

I think almost everyone has been sexually assaulted. I've only heard like a few guys say they were never groped. I was groped 3 times in school. (Only two do I consider sexual assault, the two done by strangers). And I also had a forced kiss in the early grades. A sample of 1124 heterosexual British men completed an online survey consisting of a modified CDC National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, and measures of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and conformity t…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:09 PM
24

""unable to understand the unjust of her actions" LMAO What is she? A goddamned five year old????
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:54 AM
1

Your severe punishment thing does not contradict what I said. Please read what I said carefully. You're acting like a keyboard warrior, arguing just to argue. "Looking over a woman is not a problem." Right, men NEVER get accused of sexual harassment for looking at a woman /s By the way, I was once accused of sexual harassment for looking at a woman. "As this is always brought up as rape of women," I'm guessing you're talking about women who were almost blackout drunk. Thing is, these days any wo…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 02:28 AM
1

Possibly. Do you have any evidence that sexual harassment and assaults were taken seriously? I'm old enough to recall that just a few decades ago things were different. It wasn't a crime for a man to "look over" a woman. A woman who got drunk and decided to have sex was not "raped" because her consent was not deemed uninformed. And I don't recall an unwanted kiss being called "sexual assault" back then either. And, by the way, I am not implying that this was necessarily bad. In some ways, back t…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 05:57 AM
-5

You're talking about the culture war. Men vote Populist too much, so the Establishment attacks us. Women are just part of it.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 03:07 AM
21

And women falsely accuse men of rape for rejecting them.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 03:02 AM
3

What is that guy's name? Better Bachelor? I think so.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:54 AM
8

Took the words right out of my mouth.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:51 AM
0

Personally, as someone who neither dates nor marries women, or even socializes with them, women ignoring men is a plus. Guess I'm a gender separatist. Of course there are places like work where men and women have to work together, I have no trouble with that.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:48 AM
0

Did I say otherwise? Of course those figures are harmful. For one thing, a lot of people think those defs are legal. (Not sure how everyone forgot their high school social studies class. The one where they told us that only Congress and the President can create federal laws.)
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:36 AM
0

"You are literally saying men shouldn’t be put in prison for rape." Liar. I forgot what an asshole troll you really are. Thank you for reminding me. I simply have to remember not to waste my time with you. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:32 AM
1

"Grabbing an ass is not really comparable to rape." Did I say it was??? My original comment said "Sexual offenses used to, for the most part, be ignored." "Sexual offenses" should have made it clear that I was talking about more than just rape. You clearly made the baseless assumption that I was talking solely about rape. I was not. The fact the OP was talking about rape is immaterial. I was making a general comment that included rape and more.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:28 AM
6

So you just deliberated missed my point and you think that was a counter point? Einstein, my point was the disparity in the reactions I gave is a consequence of the demonization of male sexuality. Men go to jail for rape, women do not. This is because of this demonization.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:53 AM
1

Cool
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:50 AM
2

You think being inconsistent proves she's a grifter? LMAO
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:48 AM
0

Actually that's not true in most US states. The FBI and CDC def of rape is not legal, just their policy. In US civilian populations, rape laws vary by state. In fact, some states don't use the word rape at all.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:46 AM
14

You're right about the men, but women do that too. Actually you talking about the men is just you trying to confuse the issue. What does that have to do with women defending female abusers?
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:29 AM
5

People here saying they just ignore it forget what this causes in the justice system. Woman grabs man's ass - nothing happens. Man so much as looks at a woman's legs? Can get sued for sexual harassment. Women can do anything, men can't even look.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:27 AM
6

Well, lets see. Just to pick one example. A 30 year old woman has sex with a 15 yo boy "she gave him the time of his life". A 30 yo man with a 15 yo girl? "He's a monster, prison for life." There are lots of examples of course.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:25 AM
3

Yup.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:22 AM
3

YES, IT DOES.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:21 AM
1

That comment is so inherently unclear it practically means nothing.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:18 AM
1

First, I'll admit the history of this is not my forte. Having said that, my impression is not nearly as seriously as we are used to. My guess is only violent physically forced rapes were taken seriously. My guess is a guy grabbing some single girl's ass was glossed over. So it clearly is not a lie. And given I said "for the most part", I don't even think you could say it was an exaggeration.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:14 AM
2

Did you repost with a better title? You should.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 02:06 AM
1

Far too many.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 03:55 AM
13

Especially her other victims, bet they want allies too.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:51 AM
8

I was always aware. But what got me into the online movement was watching some Karen Straughan videos. Not at all uncommon, she is known as the gate way to the non-wokeness.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:44 AM
3

The examples in this video are repulsive. Could not watch the whole thing.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:38 AM
26

And try to get female defendants off too. I saw a documentary TV show that filmed jury deliberations of a case where a woman killed a man by stabbing him 30 times. All but 2 jurors said murder one, but two wanted to vote her guilty of a lesser charge. The defendant was hot, one male juror had the hots for her. The other one was a woman who obviously hated men.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:33 AM
19

Horrible story, best of luck to you. Men really are second class citizens now.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:24 AM
26

I second the suggestion of contacting the press.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:23 AM
2

You're welcome.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:10 AM
7

Yup, so don't marry or date women. Simple as.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 02:03 AM
1

Oh, she did not give Glaze any comments. He's the one she kissed without consent. Yeah, I know about that case. I was asking if you have video of her drooling over guys on that show.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 01:48 AM
3

Are you implying the wealthy get away with this? You do know countless wealthy men have been cancelled because of such accusations, right? I mean Swallwell just gave up his governor race and was kicked out of Congress over these kinds of allegations. So, no, the wealthy only get away with this if they are female.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 01:45 AM
1

It strikes me that your comment is actually irrelevant to my point. Your "biological gynocentrism" could be the result of anything. Hormones, the fact that, as children, we were raised by females, and so on. If you read the OP carefully, he is clearly talking specifically about genitalia differences - not the same thing. It's his argument I'm disagreeing with, not yours. Your argument is different than the OP's
/r/MensRights14/04/26 05:55 PM
0

Is there a video that shows her doing that?
/r/MensRights14/04/26 05:48 PM
4

And you're an idiot for making an irrelevant comment.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 05:47 PM
5

THIS^^^^
/r/MensRights14/04/26 05:37 PM
6

Oh, OK. Yeah, the sexual assault charge is new. It's also by a woman, if that matters.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 03:38 AM
17

Maybe it went around on some subs, but the media has all but ignored this. The only case I had heard before was when she kissed that guy without his consent on the TV show.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 03:29 AM
4

Sexual offenses used to, for the most part, be ignored. Feminism is what changed that. Of course feminism doesn't give a sh%t about men, ergo, nothing was done for men along these lines, only for women.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:28 AM
3

God is England is f&$ked in the head.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:24 AM
4

"and this reproductive bias cannot be eliminated unless we as a species genetically intervene to fix human reproductive systems." I disagree with that. I think this bias is TAUGHT, not a consequence of physical traits.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 02:21 AM
8

Grown man here. I cry at movies. Not at all movies of course LMAO
/r/MensRights13/04/26 02:47 AM
54

So, he was 11 or 12, and no prison. In the USA. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 01:16 AM
1

Not to swift at reading, eh? Obviously I WAS actually talking about suing the prosecutor, since, you know, he's the one who actually does the prosecution, the potentially malicious prosecution. That is because you said "Yes, FALSE allegations. Being found not guilty is not evidence allegations were false and when the legal system says it believes an allegation enough to go to trial you have no chance in a civil lawsuit." I was addressing your point that you have no recourse if the legal system b…
/r/MensRights12/04/26 09:18 PM
3

YES
/r/MensRights12/04/26 02:04 AM
8

Men are never forgiven anything, unless they did it for someone else. Women are pretty much forgiven everything.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 01:52 AM
1

You know, it strikes me that if what you said was true, there would be no such thing as suing for malicious prosecution. I mean, you could never win a malicious prosecution suit if what you said was true. And yet, you CAN sue for malicious prosecution. According to google AI "Successful suits for malicious prosecution require proving that a criminal or civil proceeding was initiated without probable cause, with malice, and terminated in the defendant's favor. Plaintiffs must show the case ended …
/r/MensRights12/04/26 01:44 AM
30

There is no foolproof protection. The best you can do is avoid sexual activity with women. Avoiding socializing in general with women is even better.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 04:30 AM
-1

From Search Assist, the DuckDuckGo AI "You can sue for false allegations through claims of defamation, which includes slander (spoken statements) and libel (written statements), or for malicious prosecution if the allegations led to legal action against you. It's important to gather evidence and consult with an attorney to understand your legal options and the requirements for your case".
/r/MensRights11/04/26 04:28 AM
6

I think this comment is brilliant.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 03:02 AM
14

Beat me to it.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:55 AM
16

Just in case anyone is wondering, this is what he says we are not doing. Men Are Buying Hacking Tools to Use Against Their Wives and Friends In Telegram groups, men are sharing thousands of nonconsensual images of women and girls, buying spyware, and engaging in doxing and sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:51 AM
4

He said it was law 6284 in Turkey.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 05:58 PM
1

I think it's pretty simple. If it messes up your life, it's an addiction. If it does not, then it's fine.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 03:36 AM
3

True, but that's got nothing to do with my point, except maybe it agrees with my point, that this is just sexism. It has nothing to do with men being stronger, like I said.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 03:32 AM
5

The clearest evidence it is NOT because men are stronger is that this is said to young boys and girls. At that age the difference in strength between the sexes is minimal. It's just sexism, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 01:41 AM
1

Read this paper and pick out the parts you want. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353570309_On_the_Sexual_Assault_of_Men
/r/MensRights08/04/26 01:31 AM
28

Thank you for this. I'm passing these along to a men's group.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 10:05 PM
4

You got that right. A great example in a post in this sub, just shortly after yours here https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1se5c2g/sabrina_carpenter_killing_men_in_music_videos_a/
/r/MensRights06/04/26 09:30 PM
70

The fact she kills all of those men is nothing compared to the article itself. The way the author just cheers all of those killings is just sick. I don't know if that author has a male significant other, but if she does, I hope he dumps her after reading her article. Because that woman is dangerous. I would be shocked if she did not, at least a few times in her life, physically hurt a man. I mean even in today's world, this is a record for misandry.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 09:05 PM
57

Well, women are allowed to beat up men just because they feel like it, so I doubt anyone who's not an MRA would blame her for this.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 08:55 PM
3

Elam is a great man.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 09:30 PM
7

Elam publicly stated that if he were ever called to a jury for a rape trial, he would, in principle, vote "not guilty". No matter the evidence. He meant no matter the evidence PRESENTED TO THE JURY. More bullshit here. He said that in the context of discussing how, in rape trials, in some countries, men are not allowed to present evidence which proves their innocence. So, if you're in a trial where men are not allowed to enter such evidence, it would make sense to not vote men guilty.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 09:28 PM
10

Boy, you're not kidding. I googled the term and it is indeed going viral. There's no hypocrisy like female hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 01:26 AM
1

Well said my friend.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 01:15 AM
3

EXACTLY RIGHT!!!
/r/MensRights05/04/26 01:14 AM
16

THIS^^^
/r/MensRights04/04/26 01:50 AM
2

Looks is one reason, but I think there's more to it when you're talking about serial killers and the like.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 06:06 PM
2

I carry a civil kiss my ass attitude. Civil? You bet, but I don't bow to anyone. Well, except my employer sometimes. LMAO Gotta pay those bills.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:57 PM
2

You left off the real problems society has with us - we do vote Populist too much. Hey, we're bucking the Establishment, nobody said that was easy.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:54 PM
3

Just FYI, if you want to know why some women do that stuff, fall in love with murderers, etc, listen to the song Bad Romance by Lady Gaga. I think it explains that surprisingly well, for a pop song anyway.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:51 PM
1

Considering how Leftist women tend to vote, as far as I'm concerned, they can go to Russia/China and get all the Socialism they seem to want.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:43 PM
27

He went there to help her, so she filmed him being horribly beaten by thugs. The compassionate sex indeed.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 05:39 PM
21

Such thinking makes women feel irresistible. That's why they tend to think this way. Well, that, and feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 05:33 PM
3

It's tragic that this is happening to you. I know that, in Canada, Diana Davison helps the falsely accused. She is a well known youtuber who works with law firms, though she is not a lawyer. Even if you're not in Canada, she could probably offer advice.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 01:59 AM
1

Man that's some weird crap. "Everything AI is bad". LMAO Look, AI does a good job of summarizing things. Sorry if that offends.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 02:31 AM
5

What happened to you is a disgrace. Did you look into suing her? Wishing you the best my friend.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 02:57 AM
46

Good news. Lets wish them luck.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 02:43 AM
6

Excellent point. Very true.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 09:11 PM
3

Mostly because he is a man.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 01:00 AM
2

So basically conformists. Well, I certainly agree such people are holding back Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 12:53 AM
2

OMG, you edited it out of your comment so you could deny that you said this is rare. You damn troll. For the benefit of those reading this, in the comment he typed that started "I don’t think this is the takeaway." he said false accusations are rare, but then edited it out.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 05:26 AM
2

"I almost never see any pushback in these communities," And yet here you two are. "God forbid you sound like a normal person," And thank God for that. If I present a peer reviewed paper about male sexual victimization at the hands of women to the average person, they withdraw in discomfort from facing things they want to ignore. I had one post I put up about a peer reviewed paper taken down because it was "hate porn". Yup, the exact description used by the mods in another sub.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 05:21 AM
5

Well, for one thing, what the f&%k is a "trad type" folk?
/r/MensRights28/03/26 03:00 AM
8

This is a grotesque story. So glad I never really bothered with women.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 02:51 AM
-2

Meaningless comment here.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 02:43 AM
16

Yup.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 02:42 AM
7

I think your story is phony.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 02:41 AM
2

You'll full of shit. What you feel means nothing, it's facts that count. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/dnaevid.pdf In FBI DNA testing, about 25% of convicted rapists are proved innocent.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 02:38 AM
0

Well, the Establishment is composed of people...so yeah.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 02:54 AM
1

It's the people rising against the Establishment, and the Establishment fighting back.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 02:41 AM
23

Men have to learn to avoid romantic relationships with women. No, it's not all women, but it only has to be one woman in your entire life. And the fact is, woman are allowed to get away with this. So, it doesn't have to be all women to justify men avoiding women.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 02:34 AM
8

Because women see it as a power grab, something they can hold over the head of men.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 02:28 AM
3

I once had an aunt say "all men should be murdered", which pretty much kicks the ass of anything they have there.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 06:13 PM
2

You say elevator pitch to me, I think SHORT. So I came up with "Men are human beings with feelings too." Too short?
/r/MensRights24/03/26 06:11 PM
0

Well, you deleted your comment, so neither I nor anyone else reading this now can tell whether or not my comment had anything to do with your comment. How convenient for you.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 06:06 PM
-1

Just say it depends on the jurisdiction. Simple, short, safe, and true.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:15 AM
1

THIS^^^^
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:04 AM
2

Most places doesn't mean didly squat, Just say it depends on the jurisdiction. In some places it is, in some it is not. In most US states a woman can rape a man, at least if you go by how the law is written.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:04 AM
-1

Nice meaningless comment you have there. You said "In some cases at least," so you admit what you say is only true sometimes (which is true), then sort of vaguely imply it's true broadly. Actually, this is such a mish mash, I don't know what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:02 AM
5

Yes, that's rape.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 01:57 AM
8

Isn't he some kind of far-Leftist woke wackaloon?
/r/MensRights24/03/26 01:56 AM
2

You can be advantaged or disadvantaged for anything depending on the situation, so your insinuation is nonsense.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 01:49 AM
3

Well said my friend.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 01:45 AM
26

If they were at all sincere, they would address male under representation. Of course, they are not sincere at all. The real definition of diversity is "no more white guys".
/r/MensRights23/03/26 01:42 AM
9

Yes, they do. And it's disgusting.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 08:59 PM
1

Just one more reason dating or marrying women makes no sense.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 03:47 AM
5

When they leave one topic to go to another, drag them back to the original topic, and say, so you admit I was right about the original topic. And keep harping on that until they admit it. If they refuse to admit it, say there's no point in debating someone who refuses to admit when they are wrong. And be stubborn about it.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 01:57 AM
2

Easy to explain. Women know they can get away with it.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 01:54 AM
2

LMAO
/r/MensRights22/03/26 01:49 AM
2

I think the overwhelming majority of it is learned behavior, by both men and women. Most people are conformists, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 01:47 AM
37

There are some women who care about men's right, but very few of them. That's about the best I can do.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 01:45 AM
5

My dad was an emotionally abusive a$$hole to me. So that would be a "yes". Having said that, my mother was my best friend, so I did not have that aspect of your OP. Mom was great.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 03:09 AM
3

This is the first time I've seen a big deal made out of female domestic violence. This is the best news in Men's Rights I've seen in a long time.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 03:05 AM
3

Not crickets, they're too busy laughing at the male victim.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 03:00 AM
2

You can find quite a few videos like this. What would you do even had one a few years ago.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 02:59 AM
20

The data I have seen says female rates are higher if you include all DV, but male rates are higher if you only include severe DV.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:22 AM
4

There are some, from time to time.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:17 AM
1

I would suggest deleting this OP and typing a new one that is clear.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 03:14 AM
1

I think the reason you're not getting responses is this OP is written so haphazardly, we can't even tell WTF happened.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 02:31 AM
6

A lot of guys here are saying this is illegal. In the US, I'm not sure it is. From Google AI It is generally not illegal for a woman to enter a men's bathroom in the United States, as there are few specific laws governing restroom usage by gender,, However, entering can lead to confrontations or charges if behaviors like disorderly conduct or loitering occur. Key considerations include: Legal Landscape: While some states have proposed restrictions, there is no blanket federal law against using a…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 02:20 AM
2

This video is fantastic. How come only 20 upvotes?
/r/MensRights19/03/26 02:08 AM
1

You know, I like that, it's cute.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 01:52 AM
24

Personally, I call it out. I know some think I'm misogynist. It helps that I'm enough of an introvert that I care little about what other people think about me. And I don't date, so f&%k my "sexual access" as you call it.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 02:50 AM
25

Yes. There is a great deal of social pressure on women to belittle and hate men. Any woman who shows no such inclination is called a "pick-me" or desperate.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 02:47 AM
1

She did it FIVE times a day. Monster!
/r/MensRights18/03/26 01:31 AM
7

Only groups that tend to vote Democrat get a "day".
/r/MensRights18/03/26 01:27 AM
10

I can't recall the last time I heard about a woman's memoir where she didn't disclose her victim hood. It's like if it's not there, she just did not disclose enough. I bet publishers reject the book if something is not there.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 01:24 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights17/03/26 07:08 PM
1

Yeah, that works too.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:07 PM
1

You should add /s to this comment.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 04:28 PM
2

That's supposed to be an angry face. Use your imagination. lol
/r/MensRights17/03/26 04:26 PM
3

If for no other reason then to piss them off, that's why. We have to make noise if we want change.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 04:25 PM
3

I said it was over politics.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 04:23 PM
82

Psychological AND PHYSICAL ABUSE!!
/r/MensRights17/03/26 03:51 AM
37

You have GOT to be kidding!!! LMAO
/r/MensRights17/03/26 03:24 AM
2

Indeed.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 03:12 AM
9

Yup.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 03:11 AM
0

Can't get the video to play.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 01:57 AM
9

There is evidence of discrimination against boys in education. Funny how when there's fewer boys in education people want to talk about why, but when it's fewer girls in education, people just scream discrimination. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1hdu3af/improving_education_outcomes_for_boys/
/r/MensRights17/03/26 01:51 AM
31

This is nothing new. Here's a violent mob of feminists attacking men, who were defending a church from the feminists. Feminists attack men and a church https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOCD_T9Qqpc
/r/MensRights17/03/26 01:42 AM
2

But without feminism, we would not be on the losing side.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 02:17 AM
14

Studies, like the CDC for example, actually show women commit more domestic violence than men do. Men commit more serious DV, but not that much more.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:57 AM
16

I'm not interested in why I was born a white male. More interesting to me, is why I'm treated a certain way BECAUSE I'm a white male. This sounds like what you are really talking about. And the reason men have it more difficult than we used to is due to the culture war. Populism has risen as a threat to the Establishment, and men, esp straight white men, vote Populist more than the rest of the population. So the Establishment has put a target on our backs, that is why we are being targeted. We h…
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:30 AM
2

It's like you read my mind. Exact same words.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 12:49 AM
7

Some anger is not only good, but necessary. We need men to be angry enough that they fight against the injustices, but not so angry that the anger eats them up inside. As in all things, maintain a balance.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 12:46 AM
11

“There are lots of interconnected reasons that men often have difficulty saying no to sex. The performance of masculinity requires men to always be interested in sex, and to be willing and able to go at any time. And while much has been said about how this reinforces the scoring model of sex, in which having sex counts for more than the pleasure of any of the participants, there’s not as much discussion of what that does to men’s ability to consent. I’ve always said that if you can’t say no, the…
/r/MensRights14/03/26 04:39 AM
4

No
/r/MensRights14/03/26 04:37 AM
11

I think your first sentence is brilliant. It encapsulate why Men's Rights struggles to get anywhere.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 04:15 AM
11

You're pointing out the most hateful forms of misandry. I really don't know how so many guys can be OK with this stuff. Dumbf&%ks.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:50 AM
6

That guy is a troll. He's been trolling this sub for days. That's why he's here.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:46 AM
13

Reminds me of The Sopranos. Men killed left and right. Then Ralphie killed a woman and it's a major scandal. One of the outraged politicians said they did it to get more attention, not realizing he was implying women are seen as more important than men. (Actually, if you Google it, you'll see that, in 3 eps The Sopranos killed a woman.)
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:43 AM
5

Some good advice here^^^
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:27 AM
4

You know, stuff like this lends a lot of credence to a comment I read once, that feminism is just a female sh&t test. That some (many?) women don't believe in feminism's tenets at all, it's just women bitching at men to see how much men will put up with, testing men to see how weak they are. If this woman believed in 10% of what feminism says, she would never put up with this, yet here she is. Her husband showed her that he's in charge, so she folded like a house of cards.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:20 AM
1

A lot of international women are scammers too.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 02:05 AM
4

Preach brother.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 01:19 AM
9

Need an Instagram account.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 04:35 PM
1

Now that's what you call looking on the bright side.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 04:13 PM
11

One of my nephews was kicked in the head by his girlfriend while they were in the car.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 03:33 AM
2

For those of us who are "of a certain age", this reminds me of the Agent Orange Files, where women spoke of shooting men on the street. Not they they actually did it, it was more feminist fantasy. Though you know some of them did stuff to men. Just because that many women with that much hate - some of them had to do something.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 02:04 AM
1

There is some truth to what they say, but 22% of heterosexual partner killings are the women killing the man, and 78% is the reverse. Does that mean that those men who are part of those 22% don't count? Discounting male victims is just a misandric excuse. And men are 2 - 3 times as likely to be murdered as women, so ask them, does that mean we should ignore female murder victims because there are more male murder victims?
/r/MensRights12/03/26 01:55 AM
8

Men who date or marry are just plain stupid. The juice is not worth the squeeze.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 01:49 AM
3

I'm sorry to hear about the kicking. I think almost all boys were sexually assaulted while in school. Most guys I've heard from online have said they had a girl grab their ass while in school. I had two ass grabs by total strangers while in high school and a forced kiss while in grade school.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 01:41 AM
2

Read the War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers. You can read chapter one for free here https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/first/s/sommers-war.html?mcubz=3
/r/MensRights11/03/26 01:31 AM
5

Somebody get Trump on this. He has stopped stuff like this before.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 01:25 AM
25

I think there would be a huge DECREASE in sexual violence if we put women in jail for committing it.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 01:21 AM
113

Add Women are allowed to sexually harass/assault men with impunity. Women can insult men, even publicly, with impunity. In fact, the man usually gets laughed at.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 01:18 AM
3

I like that.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:31 AM
1

Standard keyboard warrior crap. Nothing but personal insult. How about some facts? From Google AI "The use of "with" as a euphemism for sexual intercourse evolved from the long-standing idiom "sleep with." While the phrase "sleep with" has been used to denote sexual intimacy for centuries, the specific transition of "being with" someone—as a standalone shorthand for having a sexual relationship—gained significant cultural prominence in the late 20th century." And "Cultural Context: The transitio…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:28 AM
3

Good thing she's your ex now.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 07:09 PM
6

Repulsive!!!
/r/MensRights10/03/26 06:50 PM
1

The comment was not aimed at you, I just wanted to see my points since you were part of the conversation here. No offense intended.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 06:40 PM
4

I doubt it.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 06:37 PM
1

You mean reported the listing of the T-shirt? If so, good idea.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 06:37 PM
9

Wait, why can't he read the article? Is it blocked in some countries or something?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:02 AM
1

Yeah, because the 1980s was so long ago. I mean it was like the 1600s, right? Look, I'm nearing 70 years old, the 1980s was not a "different time period". What are you, a teenager?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:00 AM
1

"And being “with“ someone has never had any sexual implication, it means you are more than friends, perhaps even dating, that’s all." LMAO
/r/MensRights10/03/26 03:21 AM
5

I've seen females get off with less evidence of their abuse. In fact, I've seen quite a few articles where the women got off, and the article even said there was no evidence of the abuse. Because "believe all women" right? Wait, you're the same guy who left that post under my OP!!! Hey all, this person is trolling this sub. u/pdx-Psych
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:50 AM
8

"This post reads like more concern trolling," BINGO!
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:43 AM
5

Total bullsh&t.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:42 AM
1

It's you who's stretching it here a bit. "and that Joan Jett started playing when she was 19." Not sure what "started playing" means, but the song was released in 1981. Jett was born in 1958. That would make her 23, not 19. "There’s no sexual reference at all," OK, now that's total bullshit. The song has the lyric And I could tell it wouldn't be long 'Til he was with me, yeah, me And I could tell it wouldn't be long 'Til he was with me, yeah, me, singin' So, tell me, what exactly does "he was wi…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:24 AM
2

Yeah, it was only later I realized Buffy was misandric too.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 03:10 AM
3

Here's one big difference between male and female subs. Here's the title of the OP preceding this OP in this sub German police conduct raids against people suspected of posting misogynistic hate speech online
/r/MensRights09/03/26 02:32 AM
4

Women are over-represented in STEM. And it''s not just biology. Nursing, the medical field, etc.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 09:45 PM
7

Depends on how bad it is. Buffy the Vampire Slayer is anti-male (unless you think females torturing males is OK). But it also has pro-equality vibes, like letting males and females battle as equal combatants. Not to mention it is one great show. So I do watch it.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 09:42 PM
6

There are some research papers that research female sexual victimization of males. Some are written by women. In particular, I'd like to call out Lara Stemple and her co-author (name escapes me) who wrote that 2014 paper that is, in my opinion the second most important peer reviewed paper about women sexually assaulting men ever written. The first most important being written by Masters & Sarrel - the first paper is always the most important. Krahe is another prominent researcher in this area. A…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 09:37 PM
4

I do things for Men's Rights in real life. But I can't say much about it, I have to be anonymous from this account because I post in this sub a lot.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:19 AM
4

Somebody should sue over that.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:15 AM
7

I went my own path at a young age, and never married. I only loved one woman, it did not last. One was enough. I sacrificed almost nothing for women. I realize this is not the kind of answer you were looking for.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 02:13 AM
34

Maybe this is a minority opinion, but I think women's looks actually do deteriorate more than men's looks do as they age. So much of female beauty is based on smooth young looking skin. That goes away with age.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 03:49 AM
11

Why the hell are you "leaning Left" if you realize what they are really like?
/r/MensRights07/03/26 01:46 AM
12

I've been saying for a long time that fetish female domination is bleeding into everyday real life.
/r/MensRights07/03/26 01:44 AM
1

????
/r/MensRights07/03/26 01:39 AM
1

PRESS RELEASE from International Council for Men and Boys https://www.menandboys.net/pr/un-gender-health-initiatives-reveal-significant-imbalance-between-men-and-women/
/r/MensRights06/03/26 04:00 AM
43

No such thing as an iron clad pre-nup. Consider a trust instead. Talk to a lawyer first though.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 03:05 AM
33

"Never assume the woman you love now is going to be that same person in 5, 10 or even 20 years from now." BINGO! Women are too unstable to expect them not to change.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 03:04 AM
7

That's why I say consider a trust instead of a pre-nup. Talk to a lawyer though.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 03:02 AM
8

Good point.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 03:02 AM
18

It really is hard to watch a video like this. SOOO INFURIATING!!!
/r/MensRights06/03/26 03:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter