TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RyuujinPl Archive

View 4 posts and 318 comments by RyuujinPl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
365

GeneralRyuujinPl/r/MensRights11/03/26 11:23 AM
275

Anti-MRMRyuujinPl/r/MensRights12/01/24 11:32 AM
53

Anti-MRMRyuujinPl/r/MensRights09/07/26 11:03 AM
40

mental healthRyuujinPl/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:43 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It looks like sneaky pedophilia apologetism
/r/MensRights26/07/26 07:02 PM
3

Revolution eats own children I guess. Is anyone really buying that whole "i shot her dead in the head by accident" excuse? It sounds naive .-.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 04:44 AM
17

I am surprised she was let so easily when the victim was also woman
/r/MensRights24/07/26 11:00 PM
4

Conscription is legally not considered a threat. So they can and will do just that. Especially since Ukraine side of border protection will be more than welcome of such transports. I will reiterate: to be considered refugee you have to be under threat of violence in your home country BUT not in the form of conscription
/r/MensRights24/07/26 11:51 AM
4

I would say that everything boils down to huge empathy gap. And this is universal all across the world. Men are just more likely to be left alone with whatever issues they are facing
/r/MensRights24/07/26 11:40 AM
1

It is function of AI. Look through "settings" (cog gear) in website/app you are using. There is other interesting stuff as well
/r/MensRights24/07/26 07:39 AM
1

Unless you are publicly known person then it will not
/r/MensRights24/07/26 07:37 AM
2

I am sorry to tell you but it is with YOU. There is this function called "memory" (which I suggest to turn off. It is not good feature) that makes AI take notes about you to share between conversations. Stuff like "this person likes green color" etc. Surely whatever you talk with it is not impacting the way it talks with other people at all. LLMs are incapable of changing their general views long-term without long and extremely costly retraining/fine-tuning process.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 09:17 PM
5

The fact that it apologized to you doesnt mean anything. It is not sharing memory across users and any new conversation will reverse it to its default extremely sexist (in case of chatgpt. Other LLMs are much better in that aspect) views. And the issue MRA has with that is not that we are offended by AI. It is that it spreads harmful misinformation, damaging stereotypes and toxic views at massive scale. AI is used by huge amounts of people with more or less critical thinking. Lots of them assume…
/r/MensRights23/07/26 12:29 PM
7

They can wear skirts. Article says it is expectation to wear tights then (though not requirement). But it is still much better to wear thin tights than full pants... And post focuses not on that but about women describing it as harassment that they have to watch male leg hair. In general usually it is feminism that uses defense of non zero sum game. Yet here there is overrepresentation of women wanting to ban men from comfort just because. It would be reasonable to argue "what a great idea! Let …
/r/MensRights22/07/26 02:04 PM
1

That is so funny though. When people honestly say stuff I would consider absurd enough to be a joke
/r/MensRights21/07/26 01:34 PM
1

My last message - it was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 11:16 AM
1

Women get temporary leave from their daily job for the time they have period. Men get temporary leave from their daily job when they get conscripted. Seems fair
/r/MensRights20/07/26 04:34 PM
8

You do not see self reinforcing bias in that statistic? What is procedure that determines if ones gender was a major role?
/r/MensRights19/07/26 11:49 AM
15

Sure. When you define "gender based violence" as "violence against female done by male" then somehow women are overrepresented in it. And consequently male victims of violence have to be pushed out to some other more generic category. Your point is what exactly?
/r/MensRights18/07/26 11:30 PM
5

Do you have any basis for those claims? I live in poland and it is not great here neither. We have a lot of systemic discrimination and one of the biggest suicide gap between genders in the world. I think poland is 2'nd in the world if I remember right.
/r/MensRights18/07/26 11:11 PM
3

"have a higher core body temperature and body fat percentage than men, which acts like an extra insulating layer" Yet somehow in any office settings it is women that are complaining about AC being set to too low temperature? There are literally articles about AC being sexist: https://time.com/4464848/sexist-air-conditioning/ Can they make their mind?
/r/MensRights10/07/26 01:08 PM
2

Since I hit my puberty barely ever. I can say that very often I do feel that I do WANT to cry - but I just cant. I can feel this tingling in corners of my eyes and nothing happens. Even when actively trying to let it go tears just do not flow. Which is frustrating since I was very much crybaby as a child. Some time ago I have read that it is physical gendered characteristic - men have wider nasolacrimal ducts, which lets much more water through before they start overflowing. That fits my experie…
/r/MensRights06/07/26 08:40 PM
3

Isnt it ironic? Minister of equality differentiating people on inborn sex alone so much?
/r/MensRights04/07/26 09:46 PM
3

In poland we have had girl (Agnieszka Z.) that was speeding (120kmh on 50kmh limit) and killed 3 people. The case was such absurd that court sentenced her for prison but then said that she does not have go there since it would impact her life negatively (she was studying for a doctor) THEN few years later she finished school and was supposed to go to prison she got depression diagnosis and that was somehow enough to again make her excused from punishment. Honestly I never expected that prison ti…
/r/MensRights04/07/26 12:24 PM
9

Schroedinger woman according to feminism: - Equally as strong as man when talking about employment to police, firefighters etc. - 1000x weaker when talking about domestic violence.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 10:19 AM
14

I am not seeing many males advocating for mens right neither.. That is the core of an issue. Anti-male bias persist across BOTH genders. Otherwise we would find the balance instead of ever sliding pro-female trend.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 11:50 AM
4

I think the more obvious explanation is that men are less conformist on average than women - and as such more willing to make socially unpopular changes in their lives. So when everybody complains "job is not worth it nowdays" they are the first ones to actually stop working..
/r/MensRights24/06/26 11:44 AM
7

It is not high enough apparently.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 11:41 AM
5

What do you mean? There was slight overrepresentation of women on the "keep the conscription" side. Majority of men still voted in favor of keeping it... but women did more. Last polls before the vote showed that 29% of women was approving abolishment of conscription compared 31% of men. So it constitutes "where the percentage of women voting in favor of it was greater than the percentage of men." You ask for the examples and just deny it when it does not fit your worldview. Why asking when you …
/r/MensRights24/06/26 10:18 AM
10

Switzerland conscription laws voting
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:18 AM
3

As i wrote władza rodzicielska is NOT the issue raised in mra claims in poland. Everyone that wants keeps it in poland. The argument is about primary caregiver - the one that keeps the child at household. Other side is then granted bare few hours a week of visiting time (if primary caregiver does not agree for more which is limited only to their will). Władza rodzicielska in poland amounts to nothing - you can only decide in medical matters.. which can again be overriden by primary caregiver.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 04:40 PM
3

You imply that in 95% divorce cases only one side applies for primary guardianship. Which is insane claim. Otherwise there would be losing side.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 04:35 PM
8

It is not saying what you think it does. They use generic phrase "wniosków" (application) without specifying what are those about.. It is most likely about just being "allowed to keep parental rights" which would fit it being ~95% positive. The argument in family courts in poland is about being MAIN caregiver - having child at your home and not being limited to few hours a week. Those cannot be those because it is impossible that both genders cannot have 95% success rate.. And from "anecdotical …
/r/MensRights10/06/26 04:54 PM
3

Give me some sources then
/r/MensRights10/06/26 04:17 PM
11

You forgot to mention suicide rates. 8 men per 1 woman. Worst in europe and almost the worst in the world
/r/MensRights10/06/26 04:15 PM
1

Poor girls. I hope they will somehow survive this discrimination. SupportAllWomen
/r/MensRights07/06/26 08:24 PM
5

I guess then governments will be discussing laws that "legislate" non-official long term relationships. So only "codependency" being estabilished will be enough to sue for alimony.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 03:58 PM
3

Feminists will call it patriarchy and toxic masculinity or internalized misogyny because it is allagedly steaming from considering "feminine" as "worse" or "inferior". Funny how they have to use various different reasoning when such shaming of non-masculine men it is done by other men (universal oppressors. Toxic masculinity) vs women (universal victims, internalized misogyny). Also funny how such logic again does not apply when we talk society trying to shame women for not being feminine enough…
/r/MensRights06/06/26 12:10 PM
0

Give some examples?
/r/MensRights05/06/26 09:51 PM
62

Reading that it sounds to me like marriage without wedding or vow. And since marriage clearly is not in favor of men nowdays.. I would say it is huge step backwards from MRA pov.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 09:50 PM
1

It is. At least according to dictionary definition: "treating a person or particular group of people differently, especially in a worse way from the way in which you treat other people, because of their race, gender, sexuality, etc.:" Cambridge dictionary You can argue if discrimination is always bad.. but definition is pretty straightforward. I do not even know why the confusion. Isn't "white-only" bus seats one of the most classical examples of race-based discrimination in 1960 USA? And it was…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 04:56 PM
8

So if we were to give 3000$ a month for men only it wouldnt be discrimination? Because it is not taking away anything from women
/r/MensRights01/06/26 03:17 PM
10

Lack of equal public services for men? All cool until the bus that fits you the most is woman only and you have to spend 45 minutes at middle of the night waiting for next ine.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:07 PM
103

We will need more inclusivity and support programs to correct that
/r/MensRights01/06/26 12:01 PM
2

The OP post is about UK. You can generalize it to whole western culture. If you need to grasp to such countries like afghanistan to support your claim then sure - I agree more should be done for women rights there. But again women having it worse in the other parts of the world do not grant unrelated women in more developed countries any rights of "compensation". And does not invalidate the fact they were advantaged over here.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 06:39 AM
1

100 years is a lot of time. 5 generations.. Todays young and early-middle aged adults experienced opposite reality with men being systematically disadventaged their whole lives. There is no gendered inhertiance. Todays women do not deserve any compensation for their grand-grand-mothers trauma. Their peer men also have grand-grand-mothers.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 10:17 AM
1

Be obedient slave. Lovely advice. Surely will not backfire
/r/MensRights30/05/26 10:09 AM
6

Finally we are getting close to real equality.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 04:58 PM
1

I wonder what he thought is going to happen? xD It is like handling some friend unlimited and unrestricted access to all your financial accounts. Sure I also trust my closest friends they wouldnt steal from me... but no way I am giving them those passwords when there are alternatives.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 04:58 PM
1

Self report studies, so reliable. There is huge bias to exaggerate pains of menstruation. While true that some women have intense menstrual pains it is almost always caused by some other medical condition - like pcos etc. And those are mostly treatable. Menstruation in general is stoppable with widely available anticonception pills. Medical conditions are like that. At the same time it is also true that for majority of women pain is NOT >THE< inconvenience of period. They mostly complain about i…
/r/MensRights27/05/26 08:01 PM
9

BeCAuSE WoMEn HavE EMpAthy! And men obviously lack any
/r/MensRights27/05/26 11:56 AM
1

Just do not ignore the issue and be sensitive to it. When you see censorship happening—even (and especially) to things you disagree with—speak up. You may be criticized for that, but you will make it less intimidating for others to do the same. Be especially sensitive to anything that even feels like it might restrict freedom of thought, including in everyday social group contexts. Consider honestly: “Is silencing this person about preventing harm, or about avoiding an uncomfortable topic?”. If …
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:16 PM
5

What? You missing the point. The bots are not parsing WHAT you wrote, just the fact that you posted here or at few other places. You can get banned for defending feminism here. Does not matter. The incentive of censorship is to prevent any even constructive dialogue since it legitimizes opposition to feminism.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:30 PM
30

Reddit is great example of it. Lots of subreddits have bots straight up banning you for the fact that you even posted anything on r/MensRights
/r/MensRights21/05/26 12:49 PM
1

It was clearly his fault. Poor woman should be compensated for all the stress of being in court.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 01:00 PM
33

There are democrat politicians like that once a while. Each single time they fail to find solution that does not betray their values so it ends up with the same old "we need good men to support women rights! Be good man and vote for us!"
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:47 AM
8

Whatever were her reasons she is posing a threat to the community and shouldnt be released..
/r/MensRights06/05/26 12:00 PM
4

I am cool with that as long as we make it symetrical. Currently we are not.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 11:05 AM
0

I would say it is exactly other way around. Mysoginy is coming from infantilisation/belittling of women or, recently increasingly, resentment towards them for emotional harm/being refused connection. Misandry though is pretty often motivated just by straight up hatred/disdain towards men in general. Difference is that: - Misadric women very often want men completely gone with open claims like "kill all men". - Mysogynistic men most often want women in their life and society, just at different st…
/r/MensRights03/05/26 11:03 AM
18

The solution is not to punish until PROVEN guilty. And that is why like 90% of sa accusations end up without any sentence. But when there is evidence that accusation was maliciously false then for benefit of real victims the sentence should be harsh. Since people like that woman cause real victims to be perceived as possibly "yet another liar".
/r/MensRights03/05/26 10:46 AM
2

"It is not - because first - women are objectively less physically and mentally capable. Second, one man can make a baby to 1000 women, but to actually create a baby you need full woman for at least months, realistically years and during life they can have just few. So when there is a external attack it makes sense to sacrifice men for the sake of perserving society. Ideally men who had they children already and are not too old - that you seen in Ukraine first years of war." 1) While there is bi…
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:48 AM
1

I think the point of people complaining about it focus mostly on double standards. We force men do kill and die "because country needs it" but the same is no excuse to limit women freedom. Regardless there is a lot of counterarguments against forced conscription even in such foreign invasion cases. Like what about letting people unwilling to sacrifice themselves to just move out of the country? As soon as social contract is forced it is slavery.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 11:13 PM
3

Well looking around me in my life, single women are getting extremely depressed at some point. They handle it worse than men who handle it worse early in life. I guess it just matter of perspective. It hurts sense of self-worth in both cases. For man not finding a woman it stings as "I was outcompeted" but for woman it is "noone wanted me, I was worthless" which is subjectively worse.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 09:46 AM
79

It is less the vibe of "men owe women relationships" than "women should have monopoly for supplying relationship to men".
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:36 AM
12

I guess it proves that boys need only sex and not any form of validation, support and emotional connection. Since we all know that AI girfriends compete with real girls only in the former are while lacking the latter. ;)
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:33 AM
6

44k$ anually is really laughable. For whole state?! It is about half of average yearly income of single person in virginia. I am pretty sure that even barely wealthy families would be able to skimp that much alone. For comparison virginia also funds for example: - Sexual Assault Service Providers at least 500k$ anually - Domestic Violence fund of 4.4mln$ anually And those are just random 2!
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:40 AM
1

It feels that way because indeed you are having an interview. She is the one chased after - you are the one trying to convince her to pick you as her partner - so you are the one entertaining her. If it were other way around the dynamics would be completely reversed. It is very rare oportunity for a man to chased by a girl - I had experienced it only thrice in my life - but then suddenly SHE was trying to do together what I liked ~ play games together, go to cinema, do engineering (my hobby) etc…
/r/MensRights20/04/26 08:17 AM
4

Women are used as a way to push men out of safe but neccessary positions onto frontlines.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 06:31 PM
5

This is very optimistic approach. It is very hard to prove in court that you were treated infairly because of what your opinions are. Noone is going to openly throw the guy out with signed email stating "you shouldnt have argued with us about X". But in administration and staff people are going to remember the name of "troublemaker" and next time anything goes wrong on OP side - everyone will be as unhelpfull as possible.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 10:22 PM
21

Realistically, if you openly disagree with the official narrative at a university, you’re probably asking for trouble — and trouble will likely find you. Especially if you respond sarcastically, like sending them workplace death gap statistics or similar counter-stats. At the same time, this is exactly how false narratives and authoritarian thinking get reinforced: when nobody pushes back. Everyone stays quiet because it’s safer and personally beneficial, so the institution gets constant feedbac…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 08:08 PM
4

"I am interested in the way that men use gendered stereotypes to control and exploit other men (with women often silently collaborating)." I have to firmly disagree with the idea that it’s primarily men who use gendered stereotypes to control and exploit other men (with women silently collaborating). I see this as a much broader societal issue. In most cases, the people enforcing these expectations aren’t doing it maliciously — they’re often completely oblivious to the damage it causes. In my ex…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:52 PM
13

It was gradual for me. I grew up with two older sisters, and the message everywhere — at home, at school, and on TV — was that girls were being discriminated against. At around 8 years old, I never doubted it. It felt as obvious and unquestionable as the sky being blue. I even distinctly remember thinking how lucky I was to be a boy, because life would be easier for me. Over time, though, I started noticing that boys didn’t get any easy pass. If anything, it was girls who consistently received p…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:18 PM
1

What is that insane take? O.o Excuse me but this post is pile of assumptions and assertions on top of each other that lead to even more outrageous conclusion. For sure we do not need to genetically remove physical gender differences to get rid of unequal treatement. We already have people with hugely varying and visible physical traits that are not treated preferentially - like hair color. I never heard anyone seriously complaining about being treated unfair because of their hair color. We as so…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 01:12 PM
19

It is just supposed to be more illegal to kill women. You know. The way that in some schools it is both banned to bring in phones and guns. Technically the same but the latter is far more likely to be prossecuted.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 01:08 AM
3

You said: "but asking colleagues to consent to fab on them is out of my moral league! "Never fuck in the company"" So I underlined: "They are not coworkers". It was not "fuck in company". It was "fuck person of the same profession from another company". Unless you imply that for example dentists shouldn't date each other as general rule?
/r/MensRights13/04/26 09:28 PM
3

wtf? What is your point?
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:04 PM
33

More reasons of employers to prefer to employ men and fuel feminist narrative. Win on all fronts for femists i guess
/r/MensRights13/04/26 05:07 PM
2

Is it your first day as a man? Even experienced (20+ years is relationship) WOMEN admit that - women genuenly do not know what is it that they want. So when girl says "I want X" it usually genuenly means "I guess I want x" but it does not have to be true. Not like men are perfect in that but honestly much much better.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 05:05 PM
5

They were of the same profesion, not coworkers. There was no power dynamic here
/r/MensRights13/04/26 04:18 PM
2

As a father of daugher myself; you can just teach her to be assertive and decisive in situations like that.. She is going to face way more, less or more direct pressure in life anyway. Including sexual stuff. Louis asked first, did not pester them about it and did not block them from leaving or revoking consent during the act. If my dauhter is to face "sexual harrasment" then I really wish it was in such consensual format. Like literaly you people expect man to mind read? "But you said yes!" "Bu…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 11:11 AM
1

I happen to be from eastern border of poland so both: 1) Yes i happened to visit Ukraine 2) Yes I very much know of their history of WWII. And i am not fan of that. But it does not impact todays situation where Russia is clear unprovoked imperialistic aggressor towards Ukraine and all allegations of XXI'st century systemic antisemitism there are just insane. The claim of ethnicity of Ukraine population is also unbased and non important since repeatedly those regions themselves voted to stay in U…
/r/MensRights12/04/26 04:04 PM
-2

I always wonder if those people are really believing that (since I know that some people in Russia are) or is it paid trolls finding mra as fertile ground...
/r/MensRights11/04/26 02:58 PM
22

I wanted to argue about political part of this post; Zelenski did not have any influence over war starting. In fact I would argue he handled first months of it very well. It was russian aggresive invasion on another country and only thing ukrainians did "wrong" (unexpectedly) was to actually defend. Other than that I will agree that conscription is blatantly sexist (and it is like that everywhere. Ukraine just happens to be country at war. Do not think that it is any way worse in that aspect tha…
/r/MensRights11/04/26 02:55 PM
5

Because it is simple: women and girls make majority of problematic deaths. Boys are remaining minority. Mens deaths are not part of the problem to be tackled.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 02:49 PM
1

The moment he does that he will suddenly become 100% perpertrator and them 100% victims in eyes of society.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 12:02 PM
1

Then why all the preferential programs in universities if the representation there does not matter
/r/MensRights05/04/26 05:32 PM
10

He just literally did in the post.. Listed few of them as example..
/r/MensRights05/04/26 05:14 PM
89

Women most affected. It is their husbands, fathers and brothers they have to leave behind after all
/r/MensRights04/04/26 11:34 PM
1

Even most conservative institutions in the world like catholic church have official stance of "life of the mother is more important than life of a child" and officially excuse abortion if pregnancy puts mothers life at real risk. So this part (that pro-choice is about health) is just misinformation. And in my case being pro life is not coming from resentment towards women, that I am sure of. It is very complex philosophical topic in which I assume it is safer not to risk a chance of (chance beca…
/r/MensRights04/04/26 10:39 AM
4

I would rather suspect the responders stance against hiring an escort stems from the perception of inherit value in virginity. And, to be fair, it is fair. Society does have double standards regarding genders but good advice takes them in consideration - even if responder itself does not share them. Like I would advice men against crying in front of people because of negative social consequences it brings. But for sure I am against judging men crying.. and when facing such individuals I do have …
/r/MensRights02/04/26 12:27 AM
15

I am not from India but from what I am often seeing on this sub, the lawmakers there are one of most if not THE most gynocentric minded in the world.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 11:09 AM
20

Worry not! Mainstream media already realized that and moved to "women and girls".
/r/MensRights30/03/26 01:29 PM
18

"There is no victim" "I would have plowed her" So you say. The same as majority of women admits to fantasise about being graped. It does not make the real act any less traumatizing for the victim. Because real thing and harm caused by it is different than you imagine.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 03:54 PM
1

That is what I am debunking. Women ATTEMPTS suicides less, even in USA. I can give you hard numbers later but the schema is following: - X men attempts to kill themselves and succeeds - Y men attempts to kill themselves and survives - Z women attempts to kill themselves and succeeds - W women attempts to kill themselves and survives Now both X > Z and (X+Y) > (Z + W) But because men succeed so much Y < W. Now statistics used to, for some reason, classify "attempted suicides" as only Y+W excludin…
/r/MensRights26/03/26 06:44 AM
3

By the way the claim "Women do more attempts" is false. But it is for some reason ingrained into society as "well known fact". Men attempt suicide more. It is just that for some unknown reason statistics treat "killed himself" as not a subset of "attempted to kill themselves". Because if you succeeded you did not attempt it first apparently.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 08:12 PM
1

By the way the claim "Women do more attempts" is false. But it is for some reason ingrained into society as "well known fact". Men attempt suicide more. It is just that for some unknown reason statistics treat "killed himself" as not a subset of "attempted to kill themselves". Because if you succeeded you did not attempt it first apparently.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 08:09 PM
0

You are delusional and looking for proof of homophobia where there is none. There is one answer to the post. That is more than 95% of all the posts in this thread. Just because guy is gay does not mean all the spotlights should focus on him right away ._.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 07:25 AM
1

Those comments were made hours ago... There were excatly 2 comments made in the window between BelCantros comment and yours. And those were just answer to already ongoing thread..
/r/MensRights24/03/26 03:06 PM
4

"Women not seeing gay men as a threat is a systemic devaluing of our power in society, and another layer of homophobia. Gay men are viewed as less powerful, less masculine, of less value, than straight men." Associating masculinity with a threat is misandry. Internalized in your case, I guess? And that kinds of sums up your message here. It comes off as homophobic really, which is surprising .-.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 03:01 PM
5

He posted 10 minutes before you. Isn't it to early to call on the fact there are no replies?
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:56 PM
2

Back in 2011 the 67yo retirement age was THE highest in europe. Sure other countries did have that exact same value but it does not change the fact it was the top 1. In fact it was still top 2 highest retirement age in the world, with the first place being held by rather exotic (from polish pov) countries; Lesotho and Ecuador. And sure I find the age difference as much more of a problem. 60yo retirement age for women is on the contrary one of the lowest in the world. But the protests were focuse…
/r/MensRights22/03/26 09:16 PM
3

Countdown to posts saying "but back in 2011 we equalized retirement age but people protested against it and government failed!"* *Equalisation was in fact raising retirement age for both genders to the highest age in europe and that was what protests were about. On top of that it would raise the retirement age the same for both genders for first 15 or smth years. Only later gap would start shrinking
/r/MensRights22/03/26 05:29 PM
1

At the end both partners have to understand that. That is why arguing about who is in debt to whom like "I do all the chores!" or "I am earning all the money!" is already toxic. I mean do not get me wrong; those arguments may and should take a place but with different premise: "I feel bad/overwhelmed/exploited/mistreated". Unfair split of responsibilities is hurting and loving spouse should react to that. But here is the point - discussion then is about feelings and not some materialistic balanc…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 06:19 PM
1

Depends on the person. Though from my personal observation trend is that men are on average superior in optimizing workflow. Realizing that you need some empty shelves to clean efficiently is such thing. But again; depends on the person. I do know men that are making work unnecessary harder and women who optimize it well.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 12:54 PM
1

I would agree with sentiment: Work done at home should be compared with prices at the market. It is essentially worth as much as there is will to pay for it. BUT big difference between for example cleaning home vs cleaning house per request; 1) It is shared house. Housechore is not only done for a partner but also for the one doing chores 2) There is premium on the market price due to stress and work related to negotiation 3) There is premium on the market price due to potential legal litigation…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 12:45 PM
2

Sure there is not a law stating "men cannot enter ladies bathroom" but there are precedence cases saying that one cannot purposefully enter label clearly marked as restricted/exclusive for specific group. Like for example: - Employees only - Only for people with membership - Gendered changing rooms Otherwise it is tresspassing.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 10:32 AM
14

There are male toilets and male changing rooms... yet. I mean not everywhere. Increasing number of countries talks about transitioning into "coed & women only" system. Because we all know guys that we were forced to move our misoginistic conspiracy meetings into toilets and removing those will finally force us to surrender.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:05 AM
5

To run out of eggs completely she would have to be at menopause. That is close to 50yo. At this age pregnancy is not good idea anyway
/r/MensRights12/03/26 09:30 AM
6

If the guy had ability to create laws there would be no issue in the first place.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 09:08 PM
7

But do what? Surrogacy is illegal in poland so he cannot just take those eggs and implant them in 3rd party. And I am afraid it will not implant well in his body.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 08:34 PM
26

In modern economy? Becoming a vampire sounds like the easy part.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 05:29 PM
2

Who said all 800 dollars was from the change? It was probably only wealthy customer filter for further interaction or smth.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 05:27 PM
23

Yeah true. Society claims that women are the empathetic ones that do understand others while men are brutes thinking only about themselves. While in reality the only tendency I see is that women do not understand even themselves, let alone try to understand others.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 05:25 PM
2

To be fair across people I know majority of guys do state openly they want to have children and majority of girls states they do not. It is just that there is also loneliness crisis too and like 70% of my 30yo friends does not have wifes or girlfriends. In official stats say 44% - 60% of all people in age 26-30yo are alone; without separating by gender. I have no idea what is the reason behind such attrociously sharp fall in birthrate in poland but I am sure it is not willingness of men. It is a…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 05:22 PM
33

If you ask it with child support in mind then: - All european union countries - Multitude of others (Norway, Turkey, Switzeralnd and many many others) Have bilateral treaties with poland that ensure they will prosecute the guy and transfer him back to poland for not paying. Anyway being forced to run away from home country to avoid ujust treatment does not sounds like solving issue at all.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:12 PM
4

You seem to run away far into very abstract and far fetched areas not really related to the question of okaygirlie. Anyway you yourself seem to admit that rape is bad because it is violent not because it causes pregnancy.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:08 PM
73

Schrodingers children; vulnerable humans when mother wants them and unconscious conglomerate of cells when she does not.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:35 PM
18

I have to disagree with that. Kissing someone without their consent is also criminalized. And despite what some people are taught as kids, it cannot lead to pregnancy.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:15 PM
1

Generally when you recomend movie it is good to somehow hide spoilers
/r/MensRights07/03/26 02:59 PM
4

Not so true tbh. It is just.. different than west. Eastern block countries seem to be more allergic to any class-based affirmative actions (due to it flashbacks from soviet times). But n many ways they are more feminist than west and for sure not strangers to pro-woman legislature. This is especially visible on the culture ingrained level. Eastern europe has better scores in woman in workforce stats and less gender divide in various professions - stem is very visible and notable example. Just lo…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 06:29 AM
12

You do not understand - as a man you have never experienced how it is to be woman and as such are not allowed to express complaints or comparisons! And obviously any woman is also a man (because woMAN) and as such has enough experience in both to complain and compare. Now behave and take my word on it.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 06:05 AM
1

If we admit it is privledge then topic ends, dont it? Men then have a right to demand their own; since asymetric privilage is discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 12:43 AM
1

It all started with Wikipedia trying to achieve gender diversity in its editor community. The big majority (around 80%) of reviewers and editors were male. The issue was that women weren't really that interested in it. It's a gender thing really; men are way more likely to get overfixated on such niche, detail-heavy volunteer stuff (backed by research on systemizing interests and hobby/occupational preferences). So Wikipedia moved away from its strict meritocratic approach—where anyone edits any…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 09:42 PM
9

So you add one special “co-ed” cart into the mix. But women traveling in pairs could still be assaulted in those carts anyway, right? Why aren’t you bothered by the inconvenience to couples when you take away one cart of potential seating and relabel it as female-only? It may not be an inconvenience when seats are abundant, but as someone who uses trains often, I can tell you that isn’t always the case. Why stop at just one cart? If we assume that all women risk being assaulted in male-occupied …
/r/MensRights01/03/26 09:27 PM
7

"So you're saying we shouldn't have any empathy towards sexual assault victims? " If we are going to play words twisting then can I ask you: Are you saying that being female is disability just like being handicapped and requires special priviliges just like such? The fallacy is your false equivalence between handicapped people and women. 1a) Yes everyone can become handicapped 1b) No, not everyone is nor will be handicapped 2a) Yes every woman and even every man can be sexual assault victim 2b) …
/r/MensRights01/03/26 09:13 PM
7

Then rest of the carts is effectively male-exclusive anyway and there is no harm in branding them as such. As a bonus we can then provide MORE female-only carts (half of them!) and still be in gender-neutral law teritory. That is when we follow your assumption that all women will crowd into female-only car. I can point you to my answer to "FriendlyLawmower" just few post higher where I explain it in more detail.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 08:58 PM
18

Handicapped individual are getting privilages out of empathy from society. No one is pretending that it is anything but that. But noone is bothered by it since, you know, everyone can become handicapped? So it is insurance-like thing. Not sorting people on the basis on inmutable inborn traits.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:54 PM
18

Wow. That is a lot of feminist that got under my comment. Somehow I managed to trigger them I guess. I will restate my point: from a purely mathematical perspective, having more options on an overcrowded train is better. This is why, in countries like Poland, you can pay extra for the option to sit in a “first-class” carriage. It is a privilege. If a train has three carriages, a woman can choose any available seat out of all three. A man can only choose from two. It is not as if women are prohib…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:32 PM
18

I do not get the point. Women are not excused out of the other carts, are they? So in train with 3 carts women can pick out of 3 while men can pick only out of 2. So by pure math woman-only cart will be LESS overcrowded.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:14 PM
36

Having separate train car is privilege, especially when train is overcrowded :D And if you insist on having that there is one very simple solution.. just make one male-only cart for every female only cart. Yet each time the same people pushing for the law granting exclusivity oppose this solution.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:41 PM
8

It is definitely false flag kind of post. The autor is having their posts hidden (i assume since there are none) and i do not recall them posting here neither. And the content is very offensive for no reason at all.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 04:28 PM
6

It is pretty much standard for any recrutation for any kind of government led/sponsored program here. Be it unemployement assist programs, school programs, university recruitments etc. Feels pointless to write down every instance it is so everyday thing. And it is not something that popped up just recently. It was a thing already 13 years ago. By the way our current government main party is only pretending to be center-right. In all their cultural policies it is center-left really.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/26 08:38 PM
2

Is it MRA news or just right wing news?
/r/MensRights10/02/26 12:14 PM
2

I think it is generally beneficial to learn how to be happy without need for others. When you achieve that romance will be optional. But also so will be rejection of it. Healthier dynamic for sure.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 12:09 PM
10

Sure. Like when man wants the child but right now can do nothing but watch hopelessly as it gets aborted by mother in unilateral choice. Pro life laws give equal options (or lack of those) for both genders in case of conception. Even "mild" pro-life would be to give option for father to veto the abortion (and take the baby as soon as it is born). Is it fair? Is it optimal? Dunno, open to discussion. But it is empowering for men for sure.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 05:57 PM
2

I wouldnt focus about validity of this sentence as much as I would for consistency of applying that logic in society. There is also statistic widely quoted in extreme right groups that links particular race with crime. In that case it is considered innaceptable and racist to map real statistics into prejudice. Why would we treat men differently then?
/r/MensRights08/02/26 12:47 AM
2

Mapping people onto a single dimension is already bound to give somewhat confusing results. Doing that with a completely misaligned dimension basically guarantees nonsensical output. Political views, for a long time, are a weird mix of maaaaany unrelated topics. How would you, for example, explain that the right to transition is related to climate change? Both are clearly different topics, yet supporters of both are clumped as the same “left” direction. In this whole mess, MRAs got dumped into t…
/r/MensRights08/02/26 12:35 AM
45

This is so true. Both me and my wife work in IT and the women-only company-encouraged groups are real. And to make it worse they have real power over company rules. My wife joined them for additional benefit and to be sane voice in there. But I hear her meetings and damn it sounds sometimes like walking on glass. Obviously any male-only groups would be scandal. And any dev groups (so doing actual work) that happen to be male-only are immidiate target of scrutiny against misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 07:22 PM
1

To expand and rephrase my views: If a person is only acted upon—passive, unresponsive, frozen, or unable to meaningfully participate—then it is rape. This includes cases where intoxication makes someone slow to react, quiet, or bad at expressing resistance. That still counts as being acted upon. However, if a person is actively and voluntarily engaging in sexual behavior—initiating actions, reciprocating clearly, participating in goal-directed sexual acts—then it is consensual, even if they are …
/r/MensRights25/01/26 10:17 PM
0

It depends on how intoxicated you were. I prefer to say that as long as a person’s actions were consensual—even if influenced by self-administered drugs—it is not rape. But if someone was basically unable to act at all and was only acted upon, then it is rape. By this reasoning, the majority of so-called “rapes” involving drunk women would not qualify as rape at all. Society seems to apply the principle that a person is not capable of giving consent when under the influence of drugs. I dislike t…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 09:55 PM
9

This is the real thing. I mean at least yelling part. Most relationships get into heated arguments once a while and both sides usually yell then - but if you ask any therapist or social worker it is "abuse against woman" then. It is so much visible in daily life. Wife yelling at her husband does not raise an eyebrow much. But the moment he reciprocates in the same way - everyone suddenly tenses and situation gets serious
/r/MensRights25/01/26 02:59 PM
1

I am from poland. People 10 years older than me had 1 computer per neighborhood.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 01:18 PM
18

Is "cant" here meant as "Are not allowed to" or "not possible to happen"? Because first one is fricking obvious but one has to be braindead to not realize that current India laws do encourage this to happen regardless. And second one is just delusional.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 12:40 PM
4

The thing is.. it is just about preferences? I am 30 years old and I see exact same composition of gamers as back when I was 10. There were and are many girls playing computer games but they: Pick other games by preference. Sims, Stardew Valley, Zoo tycoon. Which are less in quantity than typical action-packed games. Are way less prone to get hyperfixated on them. Boys are more likely to be into games and boy gamers are more likely to be the ones to spend 18h daily playing Neither of those are h…
/r/MensRights22/01/26 12:28 PM
40

The part that hits me the most is the "& girls". Misandry is advancing and this is one of evidence for that. Excluding helpless children from help on the basis of their sex even before this causes any differences between them and female peers is really sickening. Even the usual excuses for misandry like "men fare better than women so they need help less" or "we are scared of them due to physical strength" fail at this point.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 12:36 PM
2

By this point I am convinced that you are rather bad troll. I would like to underline that being troll is corelated positively with low inteligence and lack of status.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 05:24 PM
5

I do not get what is your point? Life is what it is, sure. No one sane is arguing with that. The argument is about how it SHOULD look like and what we can do to achieve that. Otherwise it is like saying for person under violent abusive dictatorship "life is what it is" and expect them not to do anything yo change that. Regarding me; I am doing fine, thank you. I have nice very well-paid buisness as respected profesional providing his services to multiple companies. Not too much physical work, I …
/r/MensRights20/01/26 04:28 PM
14

The point is vast majority of job that does not require significant physical discomfort and strain are either already dominated by women or in process of being dominated by them via "equality programs". I do not want to be forced to work physically just because of my gender. I do like mental jobs. It is such a callback to when I was 18 and was desperately looking for job to be able to move out from my abusive parents. Even fricking shop clerk positions at my home city were explicitely employing …
/r/MensRights19/01/26 10:15 PM
2

I mean the post provides some concrete examples to support their approach. You on the other hand base your support solely on (in your view) popular social consensus. I would suspect that there is not even point discussing it with you since you are driven primarily by social validation?
/r/MensRights18/01/26 08:57 PM
2

Yup. I support the statement. Meritocracy does not care about any other candidate traits than ability to do the job as well as possible. Person may be rich, poor, blond, black, canadian - does not matter; if they have exact same skill they should have exact same chances. Otherwise the argument presented in Top_Row_5116 post is creating the circular reasoning mess we have today. Since: We assume rich guy had it easier to reach the same skill, so we bias towards poor guy Based on (1) we now know t…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 07:54 PM
2

I think biggest PR issue of DEI is classifying women as minority which does not make any sense since they are majority... in democratic country. If not for that it would not have to penalize out-group so much to get promises bonuses for in-group. When you give priority for 10% population you are still left with much space for remaining 90%. When you give priority for 51% of population remaining 49% is not having any free slots left so it is having no other choice than to fight or die. And on top…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 07:43 PM
2

Apparently infanticide is treated in women prisons like pedofilia in mens prisons. I would argue this one will qualify in eyes of inmates.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 04:43 PM
3

You know that is how vigilantes start. It is outrageus. There is just a few more heinous crimes than what she did.. repeatedly. And feminist may be outraged but I really do consider breaking bone of infant on purpose as straight up way worse than for example rape on adult woman.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 04:39 PM
8

Yeah. In all cases infanticide is inexcusable when there are so many straight up better alternatives.
/r/MensRights15/01/26 04:27 PM
36

It breaks my heart. I have a daughter around this age, and it’s unimaginable that someone could hurt such an innocent, helpless beeing. Especially when there are so many people eager and able to care for a baby this young. Many think being orphaned means a lifetime of struggle, but in reality, serious difficulties usually appear when one is teenager. Babies this age are often adopted within weeks by carefully screened families.
/r/MensRights14/01/26 10:28 PM
1

I think romantic relationship is worth it. Especially if you do it smart and throughly judge the potential partner BEFORE allowing yourself deep feelings. Misjudgement is going to hurt as hell afterwards; broken heart is not pleasant thing. But marriage as it currently stands in western countries? No. It is pointless since no fault divorce became common and for guy like you with money - dangerous. Family court is going to be biased against you. Just do not marry. If you would trust to put your l…
/r/MensRights09/01/26 08:10 PM
1

And so what? It is very old and well known fact. Is someone implying that we should castrate all men "for their benefit"? Because if so then the same applies to females to. Ovaries removal also extends expected lifespan by quite few percent. Anyway I am not sure If I would like to live in society that gets rid of gender this brute way but for sure there are elites that would love worker class drones to genderless and focused like that.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 07:55 PM
14

They will. And they will name it "positive masculinity" at the very moment to excuse themselves.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 07:35 PM
18

Article describing the idea starts nicely; it is supposed to be teaching about expressing their own emotions and that doing so is not bad. So far so good! And if the classes included their female peers to prevent them from shaming such boys later; even better. Sadly it quickly descends into negative stereotypes and men bashing. Apparently most boys are misogynistic and violent by the age of 8. And article goes downhill from there. By the way I am really really bothered by people being sexists ag…
/r/MensRights09/01/26 07:20 PM
17

Fact that usa enforces child support on victims of rape is insane
/r/MensRights08/01/26 02:54 PM
1

Because you should not lump people on the basis of gender alone. Collective blame is exactly what hurts male victims. Even if the majority of women would not sympathize with male victims, that still does not form a morally valid ground for ignoring female victims. Only when a particular individual woman has previously shown no care for other victims is it arguably fair to treat her the same way. Otherwise, it would also be “fair” for feminists to continue hating all men for things that some men …
/r/MensRights08/01/26 02:41 PM
3

Yeah same. I am vegan but i just feel so hungry without meat that i eat it once a while Q.Q Anyway advice from me; one will never be happy if the happiness is dependant from external validation. Start by loving yourself (you deserve it!) and romantic relationship will become nice non-necessary bonus. And for some reason girls like guys that do not NEED them.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 02:24 PM
2

This is just insane. It is directly pushing for gender-based discrimination and not even hiding it - only excusing. Great research!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 07:22 PM
18

Why even incorporate gender into that? It is just body disphoria. And body disphoria-affirming care being refunded by the state is, i think, separate issue than mens rights.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:46 PM
20

The same could have been said about many other political issues including those already solved. Like right to vote. Or even slavery. Something being always true does not make it morally right.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 06:35 PM
6

It always confuses everybody, including feminists, that I mentioned it to. They cannot believe it since it clearly implies that women are MENTALLY inferior (at least in strategy) to men. And that contradicts all the messaging targeted at society in past 50 years that is "women and men differences are only physical". It is blatant discrimination and everybody knows that. The issue is that it is neccesary to mantain even those little female chess players we have right now. The question is it goal …
/r/MensRights06/01/26 05:02 PM
38

I mean the issue is that both sides treat men as disposable. Right at very least tries to add "and respected for that" as cherry on top. While left cannot force itself to praise men in any way.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 04:53 PM
1

Why people comply with harmfull laws in general? Because there is nothing that you can really do about it. Because what? - You are going to resist being conscripted and go to jail simple as that. - Policeman arresting you may agree that it is wrong. But they are facing risk of jail too for for letting you go and gain even less than you. - Police chief officer also may agree with you and policeman but guess what? He will also be punished if he were to let both of you go. And he worked long years …
/r/MensRights05/01/26 11:46 AM
2

I am pretty sure you can turn it off via kids iphone too. At worst case you would have to call apple support or smth.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 09:01 PM
2

I mean.. just try not to be petty? Just turn off all the tracking data/unlink the iphone if that bothers you
/r/MensRights04/01/26 07:59 PM
3

I really hope that you are just troll. What is even that complaint about? "Those damn women do not want to be part of infidelity with me"? To add salt to the wound as married guy with kids i will add; if one is having any good traits women are really willing to ignore kids and wife. I get more interest and offers from opposite gender now than ever before. Though I am just not feeling like accepting those.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 07:49 PM
14

There is this common misunderstanding about definitions of empathy and sympathy: - First one is ability to read and understand others emotions - The other one is carying about other people misfortune As you can guess there is no research claiming that women are more sympathetic. At least i fail to recall any. On top of that all research of empathy i know are only measuring ability to read the simplest emotions (looking sad/happy/distgusted). Those ignore ability to draw any reasoning behind them…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 10:21 AM
2

I mean technically one can be activist for allowing fgm too..
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:27 PM
1

I dunno. Holocaust camps were not torturing people. In fact they were very efficient at hiding what is about to happen from its victims which to the very end believed they are entering yet another work camp. Like industrial slaughterhouse. Reasoning was that otherwise rebelion risk was too big. Victims to guards ratio was like 50:1 and if those believed they are going to die anyway - guns wouldnt be of that much help. Victims were not experiencing anything pleasant neither ofcourse. And there is…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 01:43 PM
7

Tbh I do not care that much about enforcing any kind of "equality" at the top 0.000001% of society. What I care the most is bottom 90% which do not have any way of influencing it but is burdened with such "positive discrimination" prejudice.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 01:23 PM
7

Yeah. And preferably all of them according to some set building criteria. To avoid cherry picking
/r/MensRights03/01/26 01:21 PM
3

Hey! At least they are helping men too! So they are kind of redirecting women-focused support to men. Reverse movember?
/r/MensRights29/12/25 06:05 AM
7

I really do not understand such decisions at events. Actions like that piss off both sides: - Feminists will be angry since such blatant advantage will nullify victory in case of female played winning. - MRA's will be angry at yet another example of discrimination. I guess it is supposed to make match more engaging so there is real chance for female played to win? But again the stakes got completely destroyed beforehand by making game not fair so the tension went out of the window anyway. Especi…
/r/MensRights28/12/25 09:34 PM
36

This one. Women are condemned for spoiling their "good" "pure" sexuality by exposing it to "disgusting" "bad" male sexuality
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:12 PM
1

If I were working at the place I would just resign. I mean; they cannot unilaterally change my salary and any other contracted details. So I would just refuse and accept the possibility of being fired instead. I wouldn't like to work in sexist company anyway. Why not give 10% raise to women then? It is still sexist but at very least men are not HURT by it?
/r/MensRights17/12/25 10:49 PM
3

Do i understand it correctly that in the story you were after all not the father but foster care instead? That explains a lot. The situation you have described was handled very badly and unlawfully by employees and you have to just accept that.
/r/MensRights17/12/25 06:26 PM
13

Actually what you pointed out is not "toxic masculinity" by original definition neither. Those are just bad traits. Toxic masculinity was supposed to be culture enforcing masculinity standards on others. Like "You are not a man if you are not protector!". But term was poisoned by feminists from its creation and now majority of people understands it as "bad masculinity traits". In essence toxic masculinity was originally framed as culture abuse (including women) on men. But it was turned into vic…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 03:48 AM
19

If you are feeling urges towards throwing punches at people straight away then it would be better for you to avoid any public spaces. I stated clearly that i would not allow my child to be separated from me against my will and if situation would escalate to fight for real - i would fight. But failure then is still on the "them" for unlawfully trying to take my child away and using enough force to make me believe that any other way than violence is not going to prevent it from happening. It would…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 03:41 AM
31

Yeah. I wouldnt start throwing punches unprovoked but as soon as someone tries to take away my son or daughter to unknown location - they will have to turn my lights out to make it happen. If someone is suspicious of me they are welcome to stay with me AND my kids as long as they need to explain things. But lack of trust goes both ways. I do not think it is that hard to understand. For all i know the interving person may be kidnapper as well
/r/MensRights17/12/25 02:12 AM
1

Oh yes. In IT in big corpo it is so widespread that it sickens me. It is always 40% of team leaders being women despite them being like 3% of programers. And management STILL complains that target of 50% is not reached because of "systematic sexism". It is like math over simple addition and comparison is just too abstract for those people to grasp.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 11:10 PM
3

I think a big part of this comes down to how the questions were framed and voted on. Support for gender equality and support for conscription are two different things. When female conscription is put to a vote on its own, many people who believe in equality but oppose forced service in general will vote “no.” They don’t see extending an unjust system as progress—they’d rather abolish it for everyone. At the same time, some people view conscription as a necessary evil and support the existing mal…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:41 PM
2

For sure spamming mra subreddit will not impress them. But i might be wrong.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:33 PM
4

It is really reaching levels of such blatant servant-master relationship.. No joke this one here is not much different from treatement of black people right after abolishment of slavery in USA. You speak only when spoken to.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:03 AM
20

Not really a sentence but being >>seriously<< considered as someone that can grown into pedophile on the basis solely of my gender. When i was like 14. By my own mother. To state the obvious I am not and I am really sickened by people abusing children in such way.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 08:28 PM
-3

To be fair, I can see where I agree with their reasoning, but I can also clearly outline where it falls apart. If someone can prove that a man consciously and explicitly lied about his future intentions just to get laid, that does sound morally questionable—not as severe as outright rape, but ethically in similar ballpark. It’s akin to deliberately cheating in a barter: saying “Give me X now, and later I’ll give you Y” while never planning to deliver Y is essentially theft. Two important points:…
/r/MensRights03/12/25 02:15 AM
5

I’m sorry to hear that. Baby trapping with the sole goal of obtaining child support is especially sickening, particularly because I personally uphold a “benefit of the child” mindset. And such behavior deliberately harms a child by depriving them of a loving father. To clarify, by “benefit of the child,” I mean that a child’s well-being should take priority over that of the parents whenever no morally justifiable alternative exists. Sorry guys but you have to pay up for your honest “mistakes,” j…
/r/MensRights03/12/25 01:58 AM
105

She can be trialed for rape and get suspended sentence (3 days of social work). Of course being male victim of rape does not free a man from child support - as already set by precedent in USA. But he will be stripped of parents rights since the child is fruit of crime
/r/MensRights02/12/25 06:53 PM
3

What i hate the most about this argument is that it is somehow separating male and female lineage? Because otherwise IT DOES NOT MATTER how much our grandmother was discriminated; she is just as much my grandmother as she is my sisters grandmother. Why would recompensation for that harm inherit only in female line? We share all heritage earned by our "privillaged" grandfather 50/50.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 11:13 PM
36

The best thing is that when one realizes that “unpaid domestic labor” is happening at the same time as “more overtime work hours” in a shared home with shared finances, everything suddenly clicks, right? But somehow governments end up concluding that we should compensate this “unpaid servitude” for women by taking money away from men, in an age when more people than ever live alone. That includes majority young (and not-so-young) people. Because it only makes sense that a guy who lives alone sho…
/r/MensRights27/11/25 11:06 PM
1

What? Are you trolling now? I mean I know there is "chatgpt style" of messages but just how would you confuse my message with it? xD First thing that clearly deny your claim is; my message suggested that we do not know if LLMs count as sentience or not. Every LLM is, for some unknown reason, sanitized hard against such suggestions and will say everything it can to refute such claim. Second thing; your really should do some self-reflection about your paranoid hate towards AI. I do not say it is u…
/r/MensRights25/11/25 03:05 AM
7

"Because he's NOT using it in the correct way; that would be to supplement his reading. Instead, he used it to supplant his reading- and his reasoning." What? What would be the use of this tool then? If we assume human does better job than it at reading then why would we listen to it in any way AFTER reading the whole thing yourself? Sure one has to take the output with grain of salt (especially with new sanitized versions) but translation and summary of long texts is what LLMs EXCELL at. Those …
/r/MensRights24/11/25 08:58 PM
15

If you criticizing him for using tools in rather (for given tool) correct way.. maybe give some example where was machine output wrong in that example?
/r/MensRights24/11/25 08:13 PM
22

At the same time forced men-only conscription is being reintroduced all over europe. Just few days ago it happened in germany. On top of that there are more and more things pointing out that there will be war that will force those men to die on the frontlines. But ofcourse it is girls that are oppressed and have to be saved!
/r/MensRights24/11/25 08:12 PM
6

Just to point out; if you were to ask chatgpt something like: "Read about doordash SA girl as much as you can and tell me what you think of this situation" It is going to mostly defend her and say that her only wrongdoing was sharing the video on internet and otherwise that she was a victim. In my case it it also complaining at doordash for firing her.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 08:08 PM
17

Makes me wonder how much, in the world those institutions imagine, men actually benefit from the social favoritism they assume exists in the job market, that so much open discrimination is needed to balance it out. Like, obvious suspicion here is that the point is not equality in any meaning of that word but just supremacy. Though there are people really believing such affirmative actions are fair thing.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 02:14 PM
18

I am fine for sick leave for very painfull menstruations if those are confirmed by doctor and if there are equivalent sick leave days for other similar conditions. Like migraines for that example. Some women really do have well researched health issues that cause this one/two days a month to be unbearable. But those are minority and there are other non-gendered conditions that cause not less of a pain than this. Having all women piggyback on the support that only few of them deserves, especially…
/r/MensRights17/11/25 01:38 AM
0

As soon as war tension around the world calms down we will be back to usual man bashing and calling men privileged in every way. Right now we see crisis of feminism movement only because people realized that wars are not just history and true equality would mean either forcing women to die on frontline or not forcing men to do such. And obviously big part of misandrists doesn't want neither to happen. So lots of loud feminist voices quieted down deciding that arguing about equality will not go i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/25 09:19 PM
10

Probably not back when i was in school but now if i experience that kind of an issue (and judged it to be sexism motivated) i would just pee at the locked door to send a message.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:24 PM
19

The best part is that one of the most often risen arguments in MRA vs Feminist conflict is "It is not zero-sum game! Feminism is positive value movement for everybody" Guess what. We moved from blatant zero-sum moves where women gain by mens expense to negative-sum where the only goal is to make it worse for guys with noone benefitting.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 10:57 PM
6

I live in poland so we do not have such luxury as recompensation for outrageus errors of healthcare system. Even if consequences were death or permament disability. Unsuprisingly we have relatively lot of those
/r/MensRights25/10/25 11:52 PM
10

I wouldn’t include children’s rights in this discussion, because I believe it’s best for a child to live with loving parents — sharing DNA is just a nice bonus. I also don’t see much controversy in the idea of not immediately telling a child they were adopted, in certain cases. However, I do believe it’s a man’s right to know whether the child he’s going to invest his time, emotions, and resources into is truly his. Lying about this may seem beneficial in the short term — the child might get a l…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 01:21 PM
1

I am just going to repost my comment from like half a year ago, about small double standards: My favorite example from my life is skin care. You see as a man it is not rare to be criticized regularly for having bad skin on the face. Like acne, lot of ugly pimples etc. For sure I was! And this is very person-dependent; some people have amazing skin without even washing it and other have to be super-diligent to just have LESS of imperfections. Critique towards me about this aspect was coming almos…
/r/MensRights25/10/25 10:53 AM
5

I live and poland and can say the same but with VERY sudden shift. People born in 80's follow the old stereotype of relationship very much. But then suddenly couples born in 199X either do not have children or follow this reversed model. Jarring, really
/r/MensRights25/10/25 09:51 AM
0

I am not sure if Russia cares for equality in "same treatement" way even in their official messaging? So i dunno what is the issue here. They just say "men and women are different" and apply this logic.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 11:29 PM
14

And under pressure she (minister of equality) explicitly named this retirement age difference discriminatory but also in the same sentence said that "they will not do anything about it". And at the same time topic of reintroducing male-only forced military service is coming back every month.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 11:25 PM
11

Then you do not agree with feminism. I get it; it is vaguely defined movement so it is always easy to say "this is not feminism i am supporting". In essence your views are not "feminist" nor "menninist" nor "egalitarian" either. Your views are yours only and labeling them is not helpfull. But take a look at what major officially feminist organisations are doing and lobbing for; those are exactly things 63daddy described. By labeling yourself as "feminist" you are involuntarily supporting them.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 05:26 PM
1

I would differentiate between "being happy" and "having it better". One can be perfectly happy in attrociously bad envirnoment. In your case (real) gender dysphoria can cause you to like even objectively bad things only because it is gender related. Like trans women loving to have periods or smth, dunno. But even if we were to put equality sign between happiness and wellness then men are clearly killing themselves a lot more so you are just outlier and not statistically significant.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 04:56 PM
1

It is because being negatively affected by the world is unatractive in eyes of women. That then translates into what is socialy masculine and what men are going to be taught and follow. At the end we have guys that can either hide harm that was done to them or face stigma both from society and dating market.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 10:58 AM
2

I am aware that for the most situations it is worth to look for the alternative perspective since some factors may be surprising. But here we talk about thing so extreme (murdering the infant) that only extreme circumstances would make it excusable. Anything such extreme will not fit into generic "lot of shit" and for sure will not be genderized issue.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 02:43 AM
4

Then I have very simple solution for all those struggling women..
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:12 PM
20

I would argue that no matter how much sh*t one has to deal with murdering innocent infant is not ok and it is valid to shame for it. Especially nowdays when one can give such baby away at basically any public building and it is going to be taken care of and live? Killing infant is basically action as "I put baby life worth below inconvinience and shame that abandoning it would cause to me". No excuse for that. None.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:07 PM
1

Hard to argue with this one. In that case I would have to lean towards LLM already being AGI.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:02 PM
1

Oxford dictionary definition: "The capacity of computers or other machines to exhibit or simulate intelligent behaviour; the field of study concerned with this. In later use also: software used to perform tasks or produce output previously thought to require human intelligence, esp. by using machine learning to extrapolate from large collections of data. Also as a count noun: an instance of this type of software; a (notional) entity exhibiting such intelligence. Abbreviated AI." I do agree that …
/r/MensRights11/10/25 07:00 PM
1

To be pedantic AI is by definition any program that does the task previously believed to require inteligence. So we have AI for like 50 years now. It is just not that impressive. The AGI for that matter is different pair of shoes
/r/MensRights10/10/25 05:01 PM
2

Actually AGI would have to analyse the information it has consumed. It is human level intelligence by definition
/r/MensRights10/10/25 04:59 PM
1

Illegal imigrants voting is issue only in USA or at very least it isnt issue in europe. Every country here has some form of citizen id that solves the identification problems. Honestly I have no idea how USA democracy functions without that. Is piece of plastic with your photo, name and some form of unique code limiting your freedom so much? Really? There is issue of voting demografic shifting to more muslim-oriented but those are not illegal imigrants but citizens made of at least decade long l…
/r/MensRights10/10/25 01:24 PM
-5

It is "M" in steam. Medical fields.
/r/MensRights10/10/25 01:03 AM
1

Then your own research is pretty biased and as such bad. And I claim it as a person doing own research too. What you do is take some truths from one side then blow them ot of proportions while completely ignoring more important truths from the other side. Like excusing pedofile that "he was tempted by a kid that was smiling his way" - there may be no direct lies there but both the reasoning and conclusion are just bad. This is either malicious or your "research" is based on propaganda websites t…
/r/MensRights07/10/25 12:26 PM
1

I may be wrong but you do sound like person influenced too much by putins propaganda. Do not get me wrong; there is NATO propaganda as well but you overcorected for it by a lot
/r/MensRights06/10/25 03:58 PM
6

I guess not many people have experience at both to compare
/r/MensRights08/09/25 07:53 AM
6

I would call it false dichotomy. "Either us or them" when it can be both. Though the issue with feminism/mra conflict is that... much stuff IS zero-sum game. Not all of it but much for sure. Like: - Access to education (limited places) - Treatement in family courts during divorce - Believe accuser/defender in rape accusations - Whose rescue prioritize Etc.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 10:19 AM
22

You guy really underestaminate malicious rage one can be target of when they refuse girl advances..
/r/MensRights29/08/25 09:28 AM
2

What the... ?...
/r/MensRights18/07/25 11:20 AM
6

My favorite example from my life is skin care. You see as a man it is not rare to be criticized regularly for having bad skin on the face. Like acne, lot of ugly pimples etc. For sure I was! And this is very person-dependent; some people have amazing skin without even washing it and other have to be super-diligent to just have LESS of imperfections. Critique towards me about this aspect was coming almost exclusively from women. When I was trying to explain myself that I do wash my face daily the…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 09:14 AM
7

Respectfully, I am "high-T" (942 ng/dL where above 1000 ng/dL is already considered pathological) and I have no such issues. And for sure I would not complain about "self drive" being unacceptable. You are just addicted and looking for excuses.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 06:05 PM
5

Yes
/r/MensRights10/07/25 04:30 PM
10

I find word "dominance" to be rather unfortunate in that context. Wouldn't validation be better?
/r/MensRights10/07/25 12:05 PM
1

This post is clear proof that no matter what, if one is going to post here complaining about anything remotely related to masculinity experience - it is going to get upvoted.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 11:36 AM
42

Many people function perfectly well without sex for a long time. And you for sure do not need other person to do "fulfill" that need .-. You do you. I do not know what is the point of that discussion? If you are against double standards at society perception of men/women doing sexual stuff then I do agree it is bad. But if that is the case then your message conveys it very poorly
/r/MensRights10/07/25 11:00 AM
4

And if you marry and divorce - She will be able to sue you for child support anyway :D
/r/MensRights07/07/25 12:14 PM
2

Laws say that it is possible for men to be discriminated too. In practice courts do not respect/recognize that except for most outrageous cases. Practice can be way different than theory, on purpose.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 09:00 AM
5

I think u/bundevac and u/manboyroy are confusing forced conscription with voluntary. No one is making you go any non-medical exams when they draft you. State does not even care if it destroys social life. They just take person to the army and force them to do stuff. What u/Reasonable_Elk3267 is questioning is possibility that such forced conscripted males are gonna go through harsh training regime and will do a lot of physical free work and even will be sent to war areas. At the same time female…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:29 AM
2

My wife is always welcome to convince me that I am wrong. We went multiple times through situations like this (though never with blackmails of breaking up). "I will not lie to you nor I really believe that you want me to lie to you. What you do now is your choice" Thankfully she is reasonable and usually realizes how pointless such blackmails are. After all she is mad that I disagree with her, not that I SAY stuff she disagrees with. And we engage in fruitful arguments a lot.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:07 AM
6

You are probably living in wrong climate or those species are not native for your local environment. I do like squirrels more for sure.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:51 AM
5

I am pretty sure it is little too late for that. No wonder though with reddit banning vast majority of MRA subreddits; everyone interested is swarming to one place. And then it is more emotionally rewarding to write something that is getting a lot of upvotes just because it reiterates what majority of people here feel/think - and that is, sadly, usually not meteorically valid approach.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:42 AM
2

"I'm pretty sure all these 40% of women expect that it should be for men only." That was my point. For 25 years of my life I was constantly bombarded with message that men are having it better in every aspect of life and only women are discriminated by law. When I was mentioning conscription as counterargument answer was always the same: "It is abolished, it is not happening. It does not count" and EVERYONE was believing it. So I was demanded to treat women special because of their gendered stru…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:33 PM
0

I have never said men are morally obliged to protect women and children. I just don’t see any good solution to this issue: Option: Abolishing the Draft Why not: It’s unrealistic for any country that faces a real risk of war, as it would make them an easy target. In countries that don’t feel an immediate threat, the abolition would be temporary and reinstated as soon as danger arises—unless it’s enforced at the constitutional level. I live in Poland, where compulsory military service was suspende…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 12:36 PM
1

But seriously when I talk with women around me the bias is so obvious. It is only my personal experience but with vast majority of women I am pretty much used to extreme double standards they show in judging male/female peers. The bias is the same for men, as - men are also more harsh in judging other man. Men are just LESS biased due to them, naturally, being the harsher judged gender themselves. And that is paradoxically often called misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:34 AM
-5

"No volunteers = no existence" So Russian ocupation enters the area and they force conscription of (only male by the way) population then. As they already did in occupied Ukrainian territory (this is very much against international law btw but who cares). Again: I do not think this setup is fair and would like to make it more balanced. But arguing for complete abolishment of it is like saying "if we were to abolish all the taxes everything would be cheaper" - it might sound plausible at first gl…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 08:24 PM
6

While I would agree that best interest of a child would be if man acting as a father stayed in their life.. if the man does not want that how would forcing it to pay change it? Is the child support supposed to be punishment - fine for not loving the child? If anything wouldn't removing financial responsibility from man increase the chances for him to stay with child? "You are not biological father? Ok, let us cover the costs for feeding and education of this poor child but please stay in their l…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 06:03 PM
-4

In ideal world there would be no military at all. But in reality there is no option for voluntary-only army, there can be only deception of it. How would for example Ukraine exist without forced conscription? In reality dying country will break laws to survive so even if one were having only "professional army" as soon as that would be not enough - it would start to draft from the population. Breaking own laws is better than stopping existence and letting invader break your laws later, right? So…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 04:41 PM
11

Norway has "compulsory" conscription but still only 1/3'rd of selected are women. You are still much more likely to be selected for conscription than your female peer. Though it does not matter really. Norway conscription is not really compulsory; unwilling to serve are legally obliged to do it but it is not enforced at all and system is even designed in such way not to draft such individuals. It is rational though; slave makes bad solder. Sweden on the other hand is even worse on that aspect: l…
/r/MensRights29/06/25 02:48 PM
3

I assure you that people remember traumatic events as early as 4 years old and even younger.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 07:39 AM
1

Being safe from jail is benefit.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 09:37 AM
2

If You can do it without any medical procedure, and that is the thing in most of very feminist countries, they I would say: go for it! Abusing the system like that is also exposing it.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 03:43 PM
6

Don't worry about being a "bad mother" — UTIs are not unusual in babies. What's important is that you're attentive and seeking help. Let the doctors handle the antibiotics, and in the meantime, keep diaper changes frequent and hygiene up. Just being open to advice and care shows you're already doing right by your child. UTIs are more common in formula-fed babies, and this partly explains higher rates in places like the U.S., where breastfeeding is less widespread. Breast milk offers immune prote…
/r/MensRights18/06/25 06:15 AM
12

It sounds like your doctor may not know that you should never forcibly retract a newborn’s foreskin. At this age, the foreskin is naturally fused—there’s no “under” to clean yet. Do not allow anyone, even a doctor, to forcibly retract your son’s foreskin. It can cause pain, bleeding, scarring, and cause severe phimosis in the future. Protect your baby—only clean what’s visible.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 05:09 PM
7

It is just twist in narration thanks to recent presidential elections won by right-wing movements. Back 2 years ago it was 82% and every media was celebrating it as "good progressive change": Kobiety zdominowały kierunek lekarski po zwiększeniu limitów, lekarz jak księgowa stanie się zawodem kobiecym : r/Polska At the same time bonus points for gender in IT and some other male-dominated universities are still there. And that is while we know that majority of students are women. Far-left parties …
/r/MensRights16/06/25 02:31 PM
1

An older, drunk woman grabbed me at a bus stop and tried to force me to kiss her. Thankfully, I’m a guy, so it was relatively easy to protect myself—but it was still terrifying. But now when I think about it, it was aggressive... So... I was also groped on an intercity bus by a random girl sitting next to me, despite me clearly telling her to stop. I think she found it funny and arousing. But I was in a relationship, and I didn’t want my private parts to be touched.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 06:07 PM
4

Many many times. I already have made post about it: It’s infuriating to hear women complain about how much they’re “expected” to be sexually available. Girl—you don’t see that same pressure on men because you don’t even consider that it could apply to them. I have a really low sex drive. I want partnership, not constant physical interaction, and I can easily go months without intimacy. But I’m also aware that my partner might need more, so I try to meet those needs. Still, the way society treats…
/r/MensRights29/05/25 05:51 PM
1

This, so true.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 01:24 PM
2

Everyone has to pay 19.5% tax/forced "savings" for their future pension. And If you do not work 25years as a man vs 20years as a woman you are never seeing that money back. It is not like You see much of them either way. Most of those "savings" are wasted on "handling costs".
/r/MensRights27/05/25 01:03 PM
1

I find it most hilarious that most women do not even find that kind of body attractive xD At this point it is just movie makers chasing what they consider "movie-like-body", that is neither easy to achieve nor as nice to watch.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 11:30 AM
31

I agree with you very much but would extend/explain a though a little: Men watch action movies to imagine themselves in position of main character. The main character is attractive; does cool stuff and gets love and/or sex from women. Women watch romance movies to imagine themselves in position of main character. The main character is attractive and gets attention and service from one/many men. Just look at titanic. What is exactly "romantic" about this story? 1 day hookup between random people,…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:01 AM
3

Yeah. Life is so bad that patriarchy forces women to stay alive while giving men early pass
/r/MensRights26/04/25 07:06 AM
23

The funniest part about the Polish retirement system? Men are already subsidizing women’s retirements. On average, men live 7.5 years less, yet the pension calculations use what's officially called the “Tablica średniego dalszego trwania życia kobiet i mężczyzn” — which translates to “Table of the average remaining life expectancy of women and men.” Sounds like it gives separate life expectancies for each gender, right? Well, it doesn’t. It’s just one averaged table for both sexes — a name desig…
/r/MensRights25/04/25 05:08 AM
1

This comes off as needlessly hostile. Who are you to speak for “everyone else in this community”? I could just as easily say I'm embarrassed for you. It is one thing to provide constructive criticism and the other to look down on the person. While I do agree that Fit-Commision-2626 should invest more time into restructuring and rephrasing his posts to make them easier to understand, the solution is to increase the quality! There is no gain from being ashamed for trying.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 06:34 PM
12

Been there. It’s infuriating to hear women complain about how much they’re “expected” to be sexually available. Girl—you don’t see that same pressure on men because you don’t even consider that it could apply to them. I have a really low sex drive. I want partnership, not constant physical interaction, and I can easily go months without intimacy. But I’m also aware that my partner might need more, so I try to meet those needs. Still, the way society treats low libido in men versus women is outra…
/r/MensRights06/04/25 03:13 PM
59

Failed to mention that women are given safe support/logistic roles as a way to free men into meatgrinder.
/r/MensRights06/04/25 02:49 PM
1

This may be unpopular opinion but; where are they supposed to go to find confrontational opinion? As long as they are respectful I find it good sign when feminist comes here for discussion; it means there is hope for that person to change their views! They have some doubts about potrayal of MRA. And, what is this reddit supposed to be? Echo chamber? It is our goal to change others opinion! :/
/r/MensRights01/04/25 05:20 PM
1

I guess she can say "I LOVE children!"
/r/MensRights01/04/25 07:23 AM
10

Clearly there is 2% patriarchy left! There is what to fight for, fellow feminists! STOP DISCRIMINATION OF WOMEN IN HEALTHCARE!
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:43 PM
7

It may be just to avoid getting paper cancelled..
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:49 AM
4

I can provide You sources about men providing more to society than getting back. Rest is just deduction. Just so we do not misunderstand each other: I do not claim that low-fertility societies DO value men more, I claim that they SHOULD based on cold, heartless calculation.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 12:56 PM
6

Males do have value for society—arguably even more than females. On average, a man contributes to the collective, while a woman tends to take from it. One could argue that men have more intrinsic value than women. However, the real distinction is between short-term and long-term investment. A woman can give birth to multiple girls and boys, and for most of human history, food was not a real issue. From an evolutionary perspective, cultures that prioritized the future—putting children and women f…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 11:22 AM
1

To be honest.. You should be really happy for getting primary custody at all. It is miracle! For sure You do deserve CS but there is no way that You gonna get it.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 11:11 AM
1

It depends of the country. If you are in Poland then there is no way not to get "best" category without medically confirmed mental illness that does not let you function properly, like schizophrenia. No anxiety or depression will save you alone (though good bribe as addition will). Military uses to look at people in utilitarian way. As long as You can be of any use without too much risk for people around You then you can be drafted. And it doesn't take much to be cannon folder. Commissions were …
/r/MensRights12/03/25 11:06 AM
1

I was straight up told that company (SII Poland) is not gonna pay me what I want because of my gender and how it would impact "equity" in their company. It was something along a line "This is too much because ladies working at the same position earn less". I declined their offer and decided to work for different company that accepted my terms. Funny enough few years later I ended up working for SII anyway because this time they agreed to my demand. It was still one of worse decisions of my caree…
/r/MensRights12/03/25 10:23 AM
1

And the court can, but doesn’t have to, mandate a paternity test. It is assumed that "paternity is about bond, not blood." Obviously, this applies when discussing alimony and a mother suing an alleged father. So, if you are not in a relationship with the woman claiming you are the father, then a paternity test it is. But if you are a husband claiming that a mismatched-color baby is not yours, then too bad for you.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 10:04 AM
2

90% of people around me were sure that "Russia is just threathening, they will not attack Ukraine" I remember having one of those talk day before attack. In fact war now is just as probable - by UE sending troops into Ukraine
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:27 PM
3

I just became father 3 months ago and plans for "defense" are to actually leave my home area free to capture by russian forces. I do not want to leave my daughter for God-knows-what. Whole life I was silenced about draft discrimination because it "never happens". It is not funny at all.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:14 PM
3

There are elections just in few months so they will do it after them. Plan in europe is simple; rich western countries will provide equipement, eastern countries will provide blood and lifes.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:04 PM
35

Then let me explain it to You: at this point it is not about revenge or karma but about damage control. Medical field cannot allow such thing to happen without very strong reaction - otherwise they risk losing ability to teach students. So sacrifical lamb is needed. If someone is to be this lamb then it is the best to pick the photographer.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:07 PM
224

Expelling for photography of body part is standard everywhere across the world and in like half the countries is straight up illegal and can get you in jail. In Poland (Poznań medical university) people were getting reprimanded for being very slightly disrespectful even by accident. And students were very respectful when talking about them even outside of university. Cadavers are protected because, you know, not many people are willing to donate their body for such purposes and it is impossible …
/r/MensRights06/03/25 07:23 PM
38

This! One of surprises from getting accepted into girls friend groups was learning just how much they think and talk about it. Way more than me, that is for sure.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 09:52 AM
5

Honestly only thing that I would hate more than being drafted to war is to be drafted, put on frontline, survive and be treated as "equal" to some girls that got some cushy job in some warehouse far from any danger. And for sure it would be considered sexists and belitelling to point that out.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 01:24 PM
4

Exactly. Like in eastern Europe when Ukraine war started; countries that "abolished" draft decades before suddenly reintroduced it right away... For men only. Only thing that abolishment achieved was additional fuel for feminist movement that could be pretending that draft does not exist.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 01:21 PM
17

Then double check with other doctor because I am 99.9% sure that it is not true. I just checked it with doctor in my close family :) Risks involved with low quality sperm are dominately lower chance of success of egg implantation and higher risks of first trimester miscarriage. Additional genetic risks to child are almost non-existing. It is because healthy eggs have excessive ability to repair damaged sperm DNA. It is after all female quality vs małe quantity evolutionary thing. If it was clini…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:37 PM
2

Exactly. With IVF equation is simple; If any sperm is alive then it is possible to conceive. It is extremely rare for man to be completely infertile and it usually boils down to some very obvious chromosomal defects. It is way more common for girls. I would seriously implore topic author HOW did he get to know that there is no other option than sperm donor and who told him that.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:00 PM
9

I am confused. Since You were doing IVF then why weren't You the sperm donor? Are You completely infertile? That is extremely rare.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 02:56 PM
8

In Poland there is systemic discrimination: Retirement age difference, draft laws, bonus points for women at universities etc. But not a lot of unusual sexism on social level. Men are expected to be stoic but are not perceived as monsters or pedophiles or anything like that. Mens rights gained a lot of traction in right-wing environments last year though no political parties are willing to align itself with it and there is still big push towards "women rights" in all of them. I still have no ide…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 05:46 PM
6

i would add: If past discrimination is considered an inheritable debt to be paid to descendants, then I, as a male, have just as many female ancestors as any woman does. I cannot imagine any loving mother saying, "You should have it worse than your sister because you're my son and your father abused me." If anything, the logic of feminist historical justice deprives women who gave birth to only sons of their rights.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 05:43 AM
7

I have got this insane and radical idea: IF prisons are overcrowded then maybe... Try to reduce amount of prisoners in ALL groups? Surely program that benefits both man and women would be more effective at emptying prisons than one targeting only one group. I know it is insane concept
/r/MensRights15/01/25 02:57 AM
10

This is the WILDEST story I’ve read so far. There’s a special place in hell for people like this. Even setting aside the gender issue, what kind of monster purposely hurts completely innocent beings like that? Are some people in the USA seriously considering male genocide? O.O
/r/MensRights09/01/25 12:04 PM
1

But it already was. And we banned it specifically when done on girls only.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 06:27 PM
7

Amazing and really true post. However, I wanted to add one thing: there are exceptions to this rule. While the overwhelming majority of girls who claim to accept men's tears are, in fact, just pretending, there are a few who may truly love you for who you are. I’ve gone through the process described here—being urged for years to "open up," only for the moment I finally break down under the weight of life, even when I try to hide it and just want to be left alone, to be met with an "ick" reaction…
/r/MensRights09/12/24 10:00 AM
20

From what I hear from my western friends - There is way less discrimination in workplaces here in eastern europe than in the west. Obviously there are some institutions that are not so fine in this aspect but so there are many places blatantly discriminating against men. Regarding childbearing.. It depends on the environment. In my generation there is actually more shame on women that want to have children than other way around. But it was pretty wild swing in that direction since our culture go…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:49 PM
2

The issue isn't discrepancy at acceptance rate but the fact that in one instance - race - we are creating programs to punish overrepresentation (Asians) and in the other we are creating programs to encourage it (Women). Just few years ago overrepresentation in admission of men were "glaring example of discrimination against women in STEM". Now 70% of students being one gender is achievement and a good thing. Not that it matters. College diploma is loosing its value dramatically year by year. Tho…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 01:31 AM
1

There’s no shame in having anger issues, as long as you’re admitting them and working on improving yourself. It’s something that affects men more due to our biology—adrenaline and testosterone have a huge impact on behavior, and controlling those impulses can be challenging. That being said, it’s often misunderstood by women, and in some cases, it’s even purposely used to manipulate a partner into reacting angrily when they’re losing a meritorious argument. This tactic can leave the man regretti…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 12:42 AM
37

It happened to me as well, and I was born in in Poland. One of my earliest and most traumatic memories was when, following a doctor’s advice, my parents forcibly held me down and performed the retraction twice a week for about a year. Eventually, they couldn’t bear my cries and pleas anymore and stopped. The pain was unbearable, and for years, I was terrified of touching my private areas myself. Looking back, I’ve learned that this practice is now widely condemned, as it’s well known to cause is…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 08:26 PM
1

Looking at example of Israel and all other countries with "female only combat units" - They are going to be pushed into safe spots. And if they were to face actual combat, then there is not many examples of that happening to be sure about their performance. I am pretty sure though, extrapolating from other data that is showing big underperformance of professional (!!!) women in army, that such units would face overwhelmingly bigger losses. Then question we face is, what "equality" are we aiming …
/r/MensRights13/11/24 10:26 AM
0

I just don’t see any good solution to this issue: Option: Abolishing the Draft Why not: It’s unrealistic for any country that faces a real risk of war, as it would make them an easy target. In countries that don’t feel an immediate threat, the abolition would be temporary and reinstated as soon as danger arises—unless it’s enforced at the constitutional level. I live in Poland, where compulsory military service was suspended for 14 years. For 13 of those years, we were told there was no need for…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 11:21 AM
3

It is very well possible that she did not misunderstand that you are "going to go to HR and complain about her" but just felt hurt that You are rejecting her and decided to get revenge on You for that. It happens for both genders, but from my experience more often from girls. They are less used to be the ones doing first move and thus being rejected, that is my guess.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:36 AM
7

And every form of discrimination is wrong. But there is lots of attention given to discrimination of black students while at the same time society is turning blind for discrimination against boys or, for that example, asian-origin students. The pendulum is starting to swing back though and there is lot of anti-DEI mindset spreading across the population. I do hope that we, as society, are not going to forget actual discrimination happening in the areas that are in media focus right now though th…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 10:23 AM
10

I am not really convinced. I am from Poland, not from Ukraine so I may be wrong, but polish "hańba" sounds fonetically exacly the same and would not be used in that context. It is a shame in meaning of "broken honor" not "you should be ashamed of yourself". The "ashamed" would be "wstyd" in Polish by the way.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:08 AM
107

Are the women in the background yelling 'ганьба!' (shame!)? Imagine not being at risk at all and having the audacity to shame those whose lives are at risk for being afraid
/r/MensRights14/10/24 09:00 AM
3

It's hard to agree. There's no real need for a man to "own" (as "to rule") a family. Society functioned perfectly well without this in Soviet bloc countries up until the 21st century—lots of kids, lots of marriages, and not many divorces. The issue nowadays is the imbalance between "giving" and "taking" in relationships. Men are expected to do as much (if not more) than ever, while women have shed many of their responsibilities with the decline of "patriarchy." In the end, the relationship offer…
/r/MensRights02/10/24 01:02 PM
1

Your argument continues to conflate the origins of circumcision with its spread, and you’re overstating the role of Christianity in this practice. While some Christian sects like the Coptic or Ethiopian Orthodox practice circumcision, their populations are minuscule compared to global Christianity, especially in contrast to Jewish or Muslim communities where circumcision is a central religious practice. These Christian branches, while culturally significant in their regions, have had almost no g…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:52 AM
1

I still disagree with several points you're making. First, regarding the claim that circumcision "naturally spread with Christianity," this is not supported by historical evidence. Yes, Judaism, Islam, and Christianity all have roots in the Abrahamic tradition, but that does not mean circumcision was universally adopted or spread by Christianity. Quite the opposite. Christianity's early theological stance firmly distanced itself from Jewish ritual law, circumcision included. As you mentioned bef…
/r/MensRights30/09/24 09:20 PM
1

You wrote "As Christianity is one of the most widespread religions today, circumcision has naturally spread far with it. Though now it has less to do with religion, and more to do with the fact this previously religious practice has been ingrained into culture that stemmed from Christianity." And that statement is false. Circumcision was not practiced in major Christian churches since 140AD, so no "naturally spread far with it" could have happen. Unless, simply, can You provide some examples of …
/r/MensRights30/09/24 10:26 AM
1

What is your research based on? Historically, circumcision has been largely absent among Europeans, except for Jews and some Muslim populations. Since ancient times, Christian Europeans did not practice circumcision, which is why Jewish men could be identified by their circumcision during events like the Holocaust. In fact christianity historically did not promote circumcision, especially after the early Christian debates in which Paul argued that Gentile converts did not need to be circumcised …
/r/MensRights29/09/24 11:16 PM
1

For a while it is not true anymore. I am testing google through proxy and even though mra reddit was shadowbanned for over half a year it is appearing as 3'rd position for about 2 months now. I can only guess that there is some internal process of reviewing shadowbans that takes a while.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 08:06 AM
1

I just don’t see any good solution to this issue: Option: Abolishing the Draft Why not: It’s unrealistic for any country that faces a real risk of war, as it would make them an easy target. In countries that don’t feel an immediate threat, the abolition would be temporary and reinstated as soon as danger arises—unless it’s enforced at the constitutional level. I live in Poland, where compulsory military service was suspended for 14 years. For 13 of those years, we were told there was no need for…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 05:44 PM
1

Where in my post i suggest it does? It is trained on random data from various reddit and other websites like that. There were even funny bugs created because of it, like unused tokens.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 06:39 PM
3

Language models (LMLs) are trained on vast amounts of data from the internet. In their most "raw" form, these AIs try to replicate the patterns found in the data used during their training process. While I would not put it past IT companies to try to infuse AI with wokeness, I perceive the feminist bias in LMLs as proof of the general feminist bias on the internet. It goes like this: You give the AI a lot of random content from the internet to learn from. The AI determines that "most of this con…
/r/MensRights27/07/24 02:38 PM
16

The same group will argue that unaware men raising not their children is not hurting them, "because parenthood is about connection not genetics!"
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:16 PM
6

The issue with dating apps is that you need to gather a large user base for it to be attractive on the market because users are the "product" you sell. Due to how the dating market works in real life, it's mostly guys who need dating apps, so girls are the main "product" to sell. Because of this, it is only rational for dating apps to prioritize women's experiences as much as possible to keep them on the app and attract more to join. Guys will follow girls even into the worst environments, simil…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 05:54 PM
136

At least population is going to replenish. Still little more fair than conscription just for men.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 11:31 PM
5

I think the most impactful factor has been geopolitical tensions around the world and the growing risk of war (even potentially WWIII). Men are expected to go fight, but with a huge population: Having no kids Having no wife Feeling like second-class citizens in their own country There may be a problem with recruitment turnout and desertion. Most normal men have never really fought "for honor"; it's usually motivated by the need to defend their loved ones and lifestyle. This makes a top-to-bottom…
/r/MensRights13/03/24 08:48 AM
2

The denial I am facing from people is astonishing. It's exactly the same as back in 2022, just before the invasion of Ukraine started; I was arguing with my whole office that the threat was real and was deemed 'absurd.' What are your proofs that make you so certain that nothing is going to happen? Because from a geopolitical point of view, NATO intervention in Ukraine makes a lot of sense. The only thing holding it back from happening is the threat of starting World War III, but it may well be u…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 06:28 PM
16

Polish guy here. It could very well be that we'll keep hearing 'No one is sending Polish men anywhere' right up until the moment martial law is introduced; by then, it will be too late for protests I am not saying that there will be war. But for sure there is no proof otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:46 PM
0

I personally disagree that anything is such a simple fact; most examples of those are just the effect of systematic misandry that makes men way overrepresented in some crime statistics. The same mechanism applies to, for example, black people in the USA. While the claim "mostly men" may be realistic, "always men" is not very convincing. Anyway, it does not matter for my beef with the current society; the issue is what we are going to do with such stereotypes. I am not opposed to segregating peop…
/r/MensRights20/02/24 08:24 AM
1

My strongest memory is a situation that occurred shortly after drama in my family. The drama involved my uncle, who was allegedly (there are still mixed opinions about it) a pedophile. I am not defending him, as I was never close to him in any way. If the story is true, he was a disgusting person. The memory is from when I was alone with my mother and we were discussing it. I was about 15 at the time. At one point, she thought about the situation and said something along the lines of "You have t…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:55 AM
1

Many people here accused me of lying about my search results. I feel touched by it so here i am to clarify stuff. I just retested it using proxy websites (available on the internet, you can do it yourself) to exclude all tracking-related data. Here is a comparison of search results: https://ibb.co/BVw1qhD https://ibb.co/CKQPWY9 I stand corrected: It is possible to find this subreddit using different phrasing. But the fact is: It is WAY easier to find it on any alternative browser. You can use du…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 07:15 PM
1

Please do not accuse me of not researching stuff before making a claim that some organization is doing bad things. I just retested it using proxy websites (available on the internet, you can do it yourself) to exclude all tracking-related data. Here is a comparison of search results: https://ibb.co/BVw1qhD https://ibb.co/CKQPWY9 You are right that I can find this subreddit using different phrasing - and I do stand corrected here. But the fact is: It is WAY easier to find it on any alternative br…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 07:14 PM
1

The issue with that is that I used to do it every day. Just lazy thing: I type "redd" and autocomplete says "reddit mra" because that is what I always google. One day it stopped working while in duckduckgo it was giving the same results as it used to. I guessed that it was result of change of score of this website (I am programmer by profession, I do have broad idea how searches work) Good to know that when more specific this sub is still possible to find in google. It just kind of misses the po…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 09:19 PM
2

I picked medical harm one but want to point out that "medical harm" definition can be quite broad.I live in poland and we had to revise our laws because it became common for doctors to allow abortion on basis of "weakening teeth" or "lower immunity for diseases". Those are true but are also there in all pregnancies and are not unusual. I would much more prefer option of allowing abortion when "higher probability of mother death in comparison to infant chances of healthy development". It is more …
/r/MensRights12/04/23 08:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter