TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Salty-Map-942 Archive

View 2 posts and 356 comments by Salty-Map-942 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
121

articleSalty-Map-942/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 06:19 AM
18

Question For WomenSalty-Map-942/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Tbf, it's perfectly possible that the man saw an action the girl was doing and assumed it was flirting with him, or mixed signals through bad communication I suppose. We can assume the hypothetical has it the friend doesn't know your lack of attraction either way, or there'd be no question (as they'd already know the answer from the context provided here, that they don't know)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/26 12:00 AM
–

Good point, I missed that the post was just about sex haha. That being said, I don't think it's bad if asked carefully and subtly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 11:35 PM
–

From what I've seen, and some assumptions of my own: These polls are self reporting. Men are still shamed more for homosexuality, compared to women. So women feel more comfortable stating any sexual fluidity. Men disproportionately can still see being gay as 'emasculating,' afaik women don't judgde bi or gay women as necessarily the inverse ar least. So men in turn are less likely to report sexual fluidity. Women are socialised more to be 'touchier and feelier' compared to men, so lines can be b…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 11:12 PM
–

Tbf, a good chunk of relationships start off from friendships tho
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 09:50 PM
–

It depends. I've been on both ends. If it's only a swxual infatuation, or only budding feelings involved, if she shoots my shot, there's no growth there and it can easily be smothered to not cause jealousy (imo) But at times when I've arguably been manipulated by being breadcrumbed, strung along by any other means, or the communication has been loose and broken over a long while, than yes, I can get jealous. Tbf, the former isn't innocuous though, and when I see the actual truth for myself, I te…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 08:33 PM
–

Nw, more than happy to do that. Sent you a DM
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 07:41 PM
–

I'm on the border, so a Zillennial, and I'm 31 (everyone calls 30 'old' these days apparently, which makes little sense from any perspective) but sure, I agree they're young there. If you'd like me to find the sources I can, but they're not on me right now, but you're only half right with the sex thing: gen Z is having the same amount of sex as previous generations but only within relationships and gen z is having relationships less on average than previous generations. Which means sex is only d…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 07:02 PM
–

1st world infertility rates would say otherwise, as would cultures with polygamy only cause more wars actually, as per UN studies. What you mean is, there's less stopping people from having the opportunity to tey and get married and have kids. Doesn't mean they'd succeed. Heck, in the 1st world it has been known for YEARS now that gen z is one of the most sexless generations for DECADES. You call that the majority of people having sex and children???
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 04:13 PM
–

Not really, it's called literally ALL nature, survival of the fittest. Only s few members of the species get to breed, the rest die off. Literally been the same since st least the first sexual lifeforms ~2 billion+ years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 04:04 PM
1

A bit semantic, but I do get your point. Still, nice needs to be consistent, as inconsistency in tbe mean time could indicate a facade e.g that's ehy they say watch how your bf/gf treats others around you, as that could be you one day. It costs nothing to treat others with a minimum of politeness, if they can't do that in general, most are going to call that not nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/26 01:48 AM
17

really? I've never heard that, I thought both genders were just as superficial if anything. Difference is imo, women usually are pickier and often tend to want more than just looks (some selected cases where they don't care) whilst guys care less.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/26 01:42 PM
8

but the women who are nice and agreeable are not most women, so the statment itself is false since it hinges on a fact that isn't real. based on what? I don't see how disagreeing with this statement makes one 'pedestalising' anyone. I think you underestimate the amount of men who will date full on bitches, just to get sex. I've seen that pathetic behaviour many times. At least young dudes (like say early 20s and younger) certainly do. So depending on how you look at it, you're half right and hal…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/26 01:40 PM
–

I already addressed your point in detail below though. It makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/26 08:31 AM
2

I didn't think about that. Still, aren't LGBT groups supposed to above that anyway? After all the stereotypical 'feminine gay man' and 'butch muscular lesbian' are entirely antithetical to modern gender role and looks expectations
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/26 08:29 AM
2

"Otherwise it's easy for them to be lumped in as just another Straight Man." YES! So much this, I'm glad someone else sees it. I'm more bicurious/heteroflexible, which while more 'subjective' lets just say, whilst it's not much, I definitely can do and have done more with men and complimented the looks of men more than the typical straight guy would, from my conversations with them and how they've reacted to me. But in LGBT circles, even if you simply dont like one particular guy hitting on you,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/26 09:01 PM
1

'dating without sex and intimacy is just hanging out with friends' no, that wouldn't be 'dating' at all lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/26 03:23 AM
1

😱
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 12:18 AM
2

Uhh, you don't have sex with friends, or at least not unless if it's a fwb, but I assume you mean 'friends friends' Also, whilst it could be called intimacy in its own way, non sexual intimacy with a partner would still be different to non sexual intimacy with a friend i.e the former would be all cuddly, touchy, non sexual kissing, looking into eachothers eyes, frolicking in the daisy fields or whatever shit like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 12:18 AM
1

Yes, if she allowed me to be in an open relationship. I'm bicurious, much more straight though, or 'hetereoflexible' whatever you want to call it. I don't date men, but some sexual stuff is fine. Ik there's more to dating than sex, and I absolutely value the teamwork, emotional connection, companionship etc. In a relationship too but I still absolutely have sex as a need, and even most women would say the same. So a sexless relationship where no sex of any kind from another source would be hell
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 07:45 AM
0

the question specifically highlights dating though
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/26 07:42 AM
1

Thank you, I could add more, especially in terms of sexuality haha
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 01:44 AM
2

You mean more on average? I guess so. Putting it in simple points (as it is a generalised broad question anyway) I'd say they broadly speaking: Want a man to take charge, and more likely one who is at least slightly more the breadwinner. Even feminists of this generation still expect men to pay for first dates essentially, and women statistically date UP in terms of age, salary, assets etc. If they didn't care about men taking charge at all or earning more, then these wouldn't be factors, when t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 01:32 AM
1

I've heard of the stereotype where their excuse is that putting on makeup is more expensive and time consuming then it takes for men, so therefore men should pay, but I haven't heard this one before haha 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/26 09:06 AM
–

So you're saying if someone is committing a mass shooting it's not ok to run them over? Once again, you gave no nuance before and you expected an answer, and now you're giving in ad hoc nuance and context. As I just said, you're self contradictory and a hypocrite. So then your answer is yes. Not sure why you needed additional information then. No, you can't read. Badgering people is not a violation of consent. Do you even know what consent is? You can be annoying and ask for sex, despite being t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:20 PM
–

It's pretty funny when she talks like a narcissist, but her post history shows she has commented a lot on surviving narcissism type subreddits 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 11:06 PM
–

The teen version days of this was "if you can't take me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best" and then those mean girls posting that shit, honestly thought they posted an absolute zinger, despite everyone else avoiding their asses 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 04:13 PM
–

Can't believe women are still banging on about this shit lol. They still believe in that myth that men are 'intimidated' with their qualifications. I don't know a single man, that gives a fuck 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 04:07 PM
–

I'm getting so tired with this sub. Is this a debate point? Or more an endless stream of not even entirely consistent points, a rant, the irony of saying you're smarter by incorrectly saying 'more smarter' (that gave me a chuckle) and just dumb generalised projections. The men do it here too, but at least this sub used to have SOME good faith debates... More seriously, I'm not going to sift through all that, but no, if you actually knew men almost none of them care for a so called 'strong woman'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 04:06 PM
1

Because that's a fucking open and closed case with no nuance. It's also about killing someone, clearly not the same whatsoever here. Such a moronic non sequtur point, you seriously think you've made any gotcha point... Badgering =/= non consensual, just annoying, are you high? And yet you made additional information you made up, when it was convenient to you. I already gave examples of where it would be coercive. If being annoying was coercive, then nearly everything would be coercive... "Judge,…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 03:54 PM
2

Women overwhelmingly disagree. Why do you think that is? You said you didn't speak for all women before. Clearly not all women agree, and again, irrelevant. They're no more right or wrong than any other woman or man on a subjective question. There's no 'gotcha' here, only you making a pathetic attempt at caricaturing any and all opinions against your shoehorned expected answer to an open ended question Me, that's why I asked the question. I already answered that anyway, you'd know if you actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:52 PM
1

"Is it wrong to run people over with your car?" Sure, because that's totally not a false equivelance to the question, and somehow at all similar to your quandry... 😒 you are the mother of bad faith points You don't have that information. She said no nine times, and on the tenth time she finally says yes. That is the information you have. Neither did you provide any, yet you also made up your own ad hoc context and nuance when you were answering others... So even you show it's almost like this qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:48 PM
2

Because it's not a straightforward question... You yourself here have added ad hoc made up context and nuance not previously said in your question, that is conveniently made just to ive a 'gotcha' What's interesting is I reversed the genders and asked it to women, and the overwhelming majority were able to immediately answer "no" without any further clarification needed. Who gives a shit? May as well be an appeal to authority fallacy, except assuming the woman's word is final and objective. It's…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:32 PM
1

- berates me on making nuance to an open ended question - literally manufactures nuance and context ad hoc when it suits him and you accuse everyone else of shifting the goalposts???
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:26 PM
1

dw, OP can't take nuance for shit haha. Clearly in here just for a 'yes' to their question, and anything even slightly else, is apparently a 'gotcha' to them
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:25 PM
1

Unless a woman is genuinely throwing herself at you and making it well known that she wants to have sex with you... you don't have consent. This rarely happens this unsubtly irl though, excluding if you're already in a relationship with them though
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:23 PM
1

- your question: If a man asks a woman to have sex 10 times and the woman says "no" 9 times before finally saying "yes" on the 10th, did she consent? - my answer: Entirely depends why she said yes on the 10th time. A bit odd to only change your mind after 9 times, but it is possible. THEN I gave a few answers to when it would be rape. What part of this haven't I answered? You lack even the most basic reading comprehension It's also very weird to accuse me of one sentence replies when the comment…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 01:11 PM
1

you going to reply to my point then? Or continue making curt one sentence replies to everyone, like on your history?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 07:38 AM
7

Babies also shit their pants and vomit on people; does that mean we should accept a similar lack of self-control from adults? That's just a pub crawl, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:15 AM
2

There are people here who genuinely believe that they'll have the police called on them for being too ugly. HAHAHAHA, I actually laughed hard at this. Thanks for that 😂 imagine if what they said was true though lmao "you're under arrest for disturbing the peace, your face is causing a disturbnce"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/26 12:12 AM
6

and guys threatening to call the authorities if they deem us unattractive or repulsive. What... You serious? If you are tbf, I doubt the cops would take them seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:51 PM
1

On the other hand, many more men cold approach because patriarchal, capitalist, heterosexual norms encourage that behavior without costing them much social respect Bit of an ideologically biased way to write that, but ok then... But this is certainly not true these days, most millennials and gen z unironically think even trying to strike up a friendly longer conversation with hospitality staff just say, or subtly giving them your number before leaving is 'creepy' you seriously think they're rewa…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:49 PM
2

personally for me, none, and I'm not really afraid of approaching in most socially appropriate places, for most people. Ik a few men though, who apply to at least 1 of each point though, and can absolutely attest to their character and their behaviour of not actually being rapists. It's also naive to think none of this is a possible issue. Like in your example, all those tiktok gym videos where random working out women witch hunt men who are in the camera's view for like 0.2 seconds, and glance …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:37 PM
2

Exactly! It's all 'diversity' until they're met by women who don't fit their ideological mould, then they're just 'pick mes' or any other pejorative. It's all about the 'sisterhood,' unless if you're a trad woman or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:27 PM
2

you didn't explain shit... Let me make it crystal clear for you to understand: - you said women will tell you when they want sex - therefore, even asking once is bad, because we apparently already know the answer It really wasn't that hard to get, no wonder you can't even get simple nuance That's no even going into the naive point that you honestly think women will outright ask for sex. Heck, even most dudes with some social sense aren't going to be that blunt on average. Do you even socialise?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:22 PM
1

Ok? I don't see how that's relevant, when the question has nuance. It's about like any debate on say sexual assault, it's naturally a touchy subject (no pun intended) and ofc no one should be excusing SA, but people treat it like there's no grey line sometimes between active consent and non active consent for example, when there absolutely is, and the law would agree with me. If I were to guess and be generalising, seeming women tend to be slightly more emotional than men on average (not saying …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 02:18 PM
1

Entirely depends why she said yes on the 10th time. A bit odd to only change your mind after 9 times, but it is possible. Realistically, 99% of the time if you had to ask 9 times, she'd have either walked away, or blocked you, not waited until the 10th time. If she was asked 9 times, and agreed on the 10th because: - she had nowhere to go - you were threatening/cornering her - she was getting increasingly intoxicated throughout those 10 times Then that's rape
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 05:46 AM
–

Where have I said what I'm saying is irrefutable truth? What... I'm just explaining in my opinion how what OP mentioned is a form of manipulation. I also just did explain how it creates a power dynamic, did you not bother reading what I wrote at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 12:18 AM
7

How is it meaningless? Because anyone with a lack of experience with something, is going to be more vulnerable to manipulation in that area. It's also precisely why the psychology of abusers has it (not saying he's getting abused at all, just an example) that they go for inexperienced people, because they tend to be more vulnerable and easier to manipulate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 05:39 AM
8

Tbf, while I agree with your point, that dynamic isn't just reserved for trad wives. The stereotype of the entitled gold digger for example, is doing anything but being a trad wife haha
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 05:37 AM
11

Presumably from what he said: projection, shaming, and assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 05:36 AM
–

You fucking serious? Literally guys here, particulary Eblademonk have calmly said in detail their points to you, and you give one word responses at best. You don't write novels lmao, not even enough words to make a haiku... So now we can add delusional narcissisum to your personality here as well. At least redpillers and other misandrists in this group can, and do engage with other points of view. You literally just use this subreddit as a soundboard, and then deflect any opposing point of view
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 11:27 PM
–

With a woman such as yourself with this much sheer lack of self awareness, it's no wonder you deflect from your lack of success here, and are full time bitching on this subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 11:13 PM
1

fair, at least you admit the double standards unlike what OP thinks haha. Yeah good point, you can only change yourself, not others after all. That too, but I meant as in those women who want to date with 'similar' or even higher qualifications, I'm pretty sure they don't just mean 'any education' they mean specifically university education. The issue in that area thus becomes two fold: fewer men are getting degrees in general, and with degree educated women dating only at their level education …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 05:39 AM
1

Let's put it this way, if nearly as many women are also obese like you, and the reason you're not attracting these statistically likely to be overwieght women is because they say "you're too fat" it's rather a lack of self awareness and hypocrisy from those same said women. Also why would a fat man try hard to lose weight, if she won't? I think a lot more of those women look for men with specifically university qualifications, otherwise why else is the gap between single men and women getting wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:09 AM
0

because it's relevnt to mention women, because you whine that men aren't putting in effort not to be fat, but why would they when the norm for both genders is being fat? So it's not a gendered issue you mean the economy is geared more to the quaternary (services) industries? Sure, but disproportionately by far more men are in blue collar than women. Those women you're talking about though, specifically only look for other men with university qualifications, not trades qualifications though. Even…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:38 AM
1

I just explained it, but I understand its just easier to have a victim complex than actually be desirable and liked by others. >says the one who never takes opposing views with good faith, is rent free on this subreddit bitching about men every few seconds, and then does nothing but deflects and distorts you are peak femcel And like I always say, for a gender that swears they don’t have options, you guys certainly behave like you have options. At what point did he say ANY of that? But sure, blam…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:29 AM
0

100% same here, but that won't get in the way of her endless projections and assumptions
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:24 AM
0

you realise there are a lot of obese women in the US too, right? Unlike men though, fat men don't get the automatic defense that body positivity and 'plus sized models' gave to obese women though. Secondly, thinking getting a degree = more money/more intelligent is boomer age thinking at this point. You realise while fewer men are getting degrees, they often may earn more in trades? Yeah...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:23 AM
0

it's still trying, the fact you're arguably judging an entire man's worth on exactly one tame Star Wars quote, is exactly the point: no amount of effort counts, if you 'slip up' merely once, it apparently doesn't count, and then types like you and Lilith will just assume no effort was put in
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:20 AM
2

I'm going to get downvoted to shit, but exactly! She's honestly the most insufferable bitch on this subreddit. There are man hating misandrists on this subreddit that can do better, and I've seen it for myself. As insufferable as full red pillers are, same with them too
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:18 AM
1

You see how reductive and assumptive you are? Something you unironically accused me of last time. You din't even quote a single entire sentence of his, taking the sentence out of context and then taking his main point out of context. This is brilliant
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:16 AM
1

First, the guy is looking for short term. Maybe it’s just America, but most women aren’t interested in short term. Tbf, you realise how biased and designed most of these apps are to hookups? I mean, women aren't delusional in thinking they'll find long term willing partners in an app like Tinder, inherently judging almost entirely from photos, and matching dudes based on their muscle? Women really aren't any better in tht respect... Second, Hinge is awful in general in my honest opinion. I have …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:11 AM
26

lol, but at least she recognises the male loneliness epidemic is real! That's more than most feminists will
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 12:53 AM
8

Tbf, a lot of pro trad wife types merely want a return away from hookup culture. There are ofc some incels who just want the trand wife ideal though, because they think they can get a blonde floral skirted woman, to instantly love them, cook his dinners, and have 5 kids though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 07:49 AM
4

On the inverse though, some women can be just as delusional in their entitlement and their standards. Social media and the nature of online dating gives everyone an elevated sense of importance. So those women all think they can get a Brad Pitt, who not only respects their independence, but also expects the guy to be at every beck and call to her as well, with little provided back. But yeah, you're absolutely right otherwise. Forcing either gender to 'date down' (in their points of view) won't f…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 07:47 AM
1

Insulting people after you got caught lying about them is really sad. Now THAT'S assumption and projection. Where here have I insulted you? I insulted your argument as 'word salad,' and saying your points are 'massively generalist and bad faith' which is not a personal insult, but a criticism of your arguments... At worst it's an ad-hominem. Otherwise, the generalisation of your gender: You women have got to stop projecting and being hysterical. Also I'm right about your bad faith Was, directly …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 12:21 AM
1

You're being stupidly broad at the very least And like I already did, elaborating... You women have got to stop projecting and being hysterical. Also I'm right about your bad faith, most of your posts in PPD have 0 thumbs up...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 06:50 AM
1

Like I said, you very well know what I mean, and you clutching at straws doesn't make you seem any less bad faith
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 01:19 AM
1

"So many men" 'They' and 'them' all the time. You're being stupidly broad at the very least, and I've spoken to you before many times, so I know you're being massively generalist and bad faith...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:14 PM
1

Yeah, I know this redditor on this subreddit way too well, so bad faith... If you're going to say an entire gender is stupid and 'needs to touch grass' I'm not going to waste my time reading your word salad...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 03:16 PM
1

'Sure.' You literally claimed '95%' passed before... I'll admit the numbers are a little bit higher than I expected, at least transmen, but it's nowhere near '95% passing' in this study conducted: "VCAG was achieved in 28% of transwomen and 62% of transmen" PubMed Visual Conformity With Affirmed Gender or "Passing" And that'd be about 40% passing if we combined both transgender identities
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 11:15 PM
1

Ofc it's not 😂 alimony in Australia There you go, again from my own country. I'm yet to see anyone provide stats that alimony is rarely given though, and I wasn't the one who made that claim
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:33 AM
1

And the vast majority of veterans are men. This doesn't help your point...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:31 AM
1

1 in 5 women aren't SA'd every year... I've seen the stats where they ask women if they've even been unwantingly touched ONCE throughout their entire lives from about 8 to 80. So ofc the stats will be sky high for such a vast range to only report once.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:31 AM
–

Where are you from then? Preferably give a source for that claim. From my own country: Australian stats Though I will admit that while men are still higher in homelessness rates, their number is declining, and women's are increasing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:29 AM
2

Do you bother to read berfore posting your trite? Where here have I said abuse isn't serious at all? Here's a proper sourced link for you UN international legal definition of abuse So abuse would be hitting someone, threatening them, sexual assault, consistent gaslighting and harassment etc. Buttering up someone at a club so you can have sex with them, assuming both parties are consenting is not abuse by this definition. I never said it was ethical though...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:26 AM
–

So dating is like guaranteed suicide? Right, and that's somehow a better analogy, how?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:21 AM
–

Right, and you call making these inane comments as an argument for anything in turn?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:21 AM
–

It was a lived single example only, but it was a comprehensive and detailed experiment... At least I'm sourcing things, rather than spamming me pithy comments on many of my comments here, that are clogging up my notifs...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 02:20 AM
1

Not sure what any of that has to do with comparing homelessness to period pains though. Fair point, but it's not true that homelessness only affects certain groups. That may as well be a stereotype, but it does disproportionately affect poorer classes and the mentally ill more. Otherwise, we're comparing apples and oranges. Both rape and homelessness are serious and at least broad enough social issues to warrant tackling as a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 03:48 PM
0

"Alimony is barely awarded anymore" <citation absolutely needed> Well I agree there at least, doesn't automatically make everyone's whine accurate or relevant. Not sure why you made that point therefore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:59 PM
0

A good handful or so, and then naturally from there, they'd have shown me some of their trans friends or acquintances. Then there's those I bump into in gay bars etc. Lol k, well each to their own, but half the time at least, especially recently with those "hey look homophobes, I bet you didn't even know I wasn't born a woman" backfires, and most clearly know they're trans...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:58 PM
-1

By that logic, rape is also not common. Rape doesn't affect the majority of women (at least in the form of forced sexual intercourse, not just unwanted touching) yet it's still an important issue to focus on. The other way around, imagine thinking, even when period pains can be excruciating for some women, that being in inconvenient pain, but in shelter with medication, is at all comparable to being homeless and in the elements. You serious?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:55 PM
-2

Absence of acknwoledgement, does not prove an acknowledgement of absence. But either way, we won't know until he clarifies what he thinks. That's just whataboutism. Nowhere here have I said it's justified for either gender to generalise. Not sure why you're trying so hard either to make periods into misery porn, I've alresdy acknowledged that periods for some women are no walk in the park. Fine, but sex for both genders carries risk. Women for pregnancy, men for alimony, both for STIs. You can't…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:52 PM
2

He was using an aencdote saying he has never seen one. That is not the same as saying there are none according to him. Secondly, even if he were being literal, point still stands from the evidence either way, which you dismissed. I literally just acknowledged the pain, so not sure why you're going on. Yet it's also a fact that it is not a universal women's experience either (who's generalising now?) If you're that scared of pregnancy, then don't have sex...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:23 PM
1

Depends on the situation. If she's naive that you just want to get into her pants, but still consents to sex with you, and then you leave. Unethical and taking advantage of? Yes. Abuse? Lol no...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:20 PM
3

Ahhh yes, apparently the majority of men are assaulting and abusing you, are they? 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:16 PM
2

Nice non argument you have there... No crazier than women whining that having so much choice is bad cause "boo hoo, there is also a lot of bad choice!" Which is like a rich person whining to a poor person that they're not as rich as they'd like to be. Only a woman could be that out of touch.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:15 PM
0

The example you gave was someone picking THEM up... You're otherwise correct, but the main point is, most men don't get the luxury of having it easy in the dating market, compared to most women. The 80:20 principle is just part of that evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:13 PM
1

"You're cherry picking" And yet you subtly ignore that statistically there are FAR more homeless men than women. Periods and getting oregnant accidentally are bad, yes, but women of all kinds experience periods from minor inconvenience to cramps. Secondly, if practicing safe sex and all, pregnancy can largely avoided, and if not, depending on where you live, abortion pills are easy to get
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:11 PM
2

Not a good equivelance, especially when a good 95% of the time, those who transition are obvious, so you get the worst of both worlds... Secondly, there have been literally documentaries, like that campus one in the 80s or 90s where women have larped as men/transitioned as one, and broke down with how lonely it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:07 PM
-2

Some guys would say being taken advantage of is better than getting nothing and being lonely. I've never had to make such a bleak choice, but I absolutely get how the former is a better option.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 02:06 PM
0

What planet do you live on? It's exactly the opposite in your second part lol 😂 I mean, it's women who are the selectors anyway, and men that court them, even in this day and age where we're supposed to be relativdly equal. So how are men being the ghosters, when they're not the selectors? It's also far more women making sky high standards, the whole antinatalist type points, and career over everything attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:33 AM
1

Yes but adding to that, there have been papers and analysis showing that societies with high amounts of polygamy tend to cause wars because of that massive divide. It's also the reason the UN oddly made not being able to have sex as a 'health issue' likely to legislatively tackle that problem e.g in many Sahel and some sub-Saharan countries. Therefore this rift kind of only proves OP's point further London School of Economics, link between polygamy and civil war
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 03:29 AM
7

"I hate gay people, but not my gay friend!" "I hate black people, but Tyrone is pretty cool!" "I hate old people, but my parents are fine!" Funny how no one really says that, or is cool with saying that, but for some reason it's only ever alright/cool to slander all men... Also these witches are the first to get antsy if someone even makes one minor stereotype on one particular woman, so them trying to pretend they even hate everyone equally is bullshit. I genuinely think if you'e a man dating w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 07:01 AM
1

yes and no, I specifically remembered at least in uni age (early 20s and before) even dudes in relationships idn't necessarily go down on their women, and those that did, the women rightfully complained because either they were just so shit at it and/or went down for 2 seconds, compared to apparently how more often women gave BJs and for longer. I also occasionally come across guys who admit they don't go down on their gf either
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:17 AM
–

both, I think it's a cyclical issue. It's true what the feminists say (though they obviously don't say it out of sympathy, or understand it is both women and society that pressures a lot of men act like this) that a lot of men lacking friendships, likely also struggle with lack of socialising skills to date. Or perhaps those that they do date, they may dump all their emotional baggage onto, that would otherwise be shared around with friends as well, all onto them instead, scaring them off.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 03:21 PM
1

Just shorterning the term 'Male Loneliness Epidemic' as it's the main topic of the post, and I wrote it in long form too many times before haha
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 03:52 AM
1

absolutely no one is saying women aren;t likely to face sexual assault, but absolutely no stat, even the broadest ones claim that it's even a large minority of men... The largest inflated stats I've seen is about ~7% of women will get SA'd, and many of these sources have a vast spectrum of SA being anywhere from unwanted touching on any part of the body, to forced sexual intercourse, usually counting if it even happened once to a woman from childhood to her 80s... Sure, it'd be good if we can ge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/26 06:03 AM
1

good for you, you're welcome to think it should be, but your air of arrogance comes across as you going 'it should be, therefore it is' hence you're a pain is the ass... You still haven’t told me how you feel about Mary Koss. You've already given me gallop statements of shit tonnes of random non similar examples, I cbf going into yet another one. Yeah, that's a lot of word salad to again say 'my assumption must be correct, seeming I said it.' You seem to make a lot of 'what ifs' and theories, an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/26 10:31 AM
1

I'm almost cetain there's a specific logical fallacy term for what you're doing there: assuming it'll be wrong in future, and therefore it's legally wrong now as well. Like the opposite of fallacy of presentism... Either way, again it's irrelevant, we both don't like circumcision, that's all there is to it. How the fuck do you even end up arguing about shit we at least largely agree with? Because of that logical fallacy though, that's a really big stretch to call it a sex crime, especially when,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/26 05:16 AM
1

ffs, like I said last time, explaining something doesn't mean I necessarily agree with it. I don't think circumcision is ok, but it also isn't a sex crime by definition. Claiming I'm therefore making an excuse when I'm merely stating what is, as a fact in the meantime is fucking retarded. and what I said above is also largely applicable to your second paragraph. I'm almost certain you haven't spoken to actors or seen how improv can easily make accidental and awkward spontaneous acts like that ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/26 11:58 PM
1

This is actually getting painful at this point, going around in circles, clutching at straws, heck, making red herrings... And now over DAYS of replying? Once a-fucking-gain it wasnt a crime back then in this hypothetical, so they weren't engaged in sex crimes. How would they feel once the law had changed? Depends on the person otherwise. And for someone who is screaming at me at this point, you sure don't listen to what I said before, and then assume I said the opposite. AT WHAT POINT DID I SAY…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/26 05:37 AM
3

a woman being forward and wanting to attract =/= a pick me similarly, a man wooing a woman who is at least largely receptive to their signals =/= simping people are misusing the definitions, that on the surface may seem the same/similar, but are pretty different. An actual pick me is pretty much an attention seeker, who will do anything to get men's attention even if it's ingenuine to their personality, and sometimes at the expense of themselves and/or other women. Whilst a simp is a pathetic gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 05:25 AM
2

It's pretty funny how they criticise a fairly out of the blue statement trying to cause a gender war, by then criticising that gender with a red herring... But yes, I've seen this a stupid amount of times. It has usually gone along the lines of: "and what have men ever done for us?" "they tend to be in occupations like soldiery and enforcement a lot more, fighting and defending against foreign threats, or maintaining order on our streets" "against who though? That's right, OtHeR mEn!" Sure, does…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 12:01 AM
1

If you're lying about being rich, sure. Lying about having 3 bedrooms when you have 2.5 is a poor example. Oh, but that is? Define rich... Uh...if they're slurring their speech, tripping over stuff, can't stand up straight and vomiting. Those are all key signs dude Those are the most obvious signs... I'm obviously talking on a scale between being sober and that... Not to mention I'm sure if both parties are equally drunk then there's no argument to be had. Go tell the courts that then, because t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 01:46 AM
1

I think in a lot of cases, we're just going to have to agree to disagree that a lot of these cases are rape, cause you're kind of ironically going into the feminist territory where just about anything can be deemed rape. That is neither logical, or a good precedent to go down, for ANY gender. But otherwise: "If you use any of the examples that I gave as a tool to get what you want then that is indeed coercive control." Sure, some of them are. Legally it wouldn't be ruled as SA until something ph…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 02:40 PM
3

So much this, every time lol 99% of the time it's feminists bitching about everything 1% of the time if men dare make a peep about their issues though? Basically becomes a social media smear campaign, like the MLE, and shat on
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 10:22 AM
4

Your first mistake is assuming all lonely men are redpillers... And yet you wonder why we rightfully point out that women simply don't care about men's issues in general? You just tar our issues as either - all our fault, and not worth sympathy - all by so called 'redpillers' and 'MRAs' (in the pejorative way But sure, we're the ones mean to you, apparently 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 05:35 AM
1

The entire website isn't the rape academy, neither was the genre, it was a specific telegram group unaffiliated with Motherless, posted on the comments of some of their video(s) Even the sensationalist source says that...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 05:15 AM
1

I haven't personally felt this, but in some ways I feel like I agree with you, but in a different way: has that even changed at all now? Like that meme of a woman pointing at lots of different shapes of women going "there's beauty in every size" with a fat guy then going "even me?" Before the same(?) woman goes 'eww, no' I also feel it wasn't coincidence when the vast majority of fat acceptance activists and 'plus sized models' not only tended to be women, but I felt insane that I seemed to be t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 02:26 PM
2

Maybe so, but that won't exactly get those women onto side either 😂 It's famously known that you need to project, gaslight, and insult people who disagree with you. It's the best way to get them on side after all /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 06:04 AM
1

it doesn't 'specialise' in it, it's a general vast porn site... Women like you don't even have a brain
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:23 AM
1

Sigh, fine cut the analogy then. As I've said on another thread here, as a guy I feel VERY needed if a woman came up to me and said she wanted to jump my bones that moment. Because women rarely approach, compared to guys, most have plenty of guys they could date and/or have sex with, so them ignoring all those suitors in the moment and going out of her way to proposition me sounds entirely like needing me in the moment. A woman can also desire me if she only wants me in a committed relationship,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 11:00 PM
0

You're making the analogy have such imaginary conditions now that aren't exactly realistic, it may as well be breaking the analogy... Which I also don't think is really true anyway. Again, if someone's ONLY way of having something meant only having it some of the time, vs NEVER being able to have it, they'd still choose the former if they absolutely needed it. "The starving man found out he would only get food some of the time. Oh well, he knew he needed the food, so even getting it some of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 10:43 PM
1

100% same here, and I can split it logically too haha Like I'm going to be stoked af if most women came up to me to want to jump my bones, and this is coming from a self confident and (I'd say at least) pretty good looking man, because that shit in general just rarely happens for most men, and those that get it more, STILL know their luck and relish in it (hence the so called chad that doesn't settle down) Yet, I'd be happy to forego all of that, if the RIGHT woman desires me for a steady foreve…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:46 PM
0

"the one who drools over it would be less ok with not having it." "the one who wants it more doesnt want to borrow it, they need ti have it." Ok, now that really is a direct contradiction... "The man was starving and drooling, but he decided he didn't need to eat now" Said no one ever... If they NEED to have it, then why would sacrificing their ONE condition (to go steady) stop them? If it did, that's not needing something by definition, or at least not needing it enough
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:41 PM
0

"the one who chooses not to engage is the one who desired him more is what im saying" Sorry, that makes no sense, and is either entirely a contradiction, or just not true in the male POV at least. If you desire someone badly enough, you'd pounce on that shit, there'd be no ifs, buts, or hesitation. If there is hesitation, or you turn it down, there's simply not the same amount of desire. Think of it like a chick flick, where there's the guy she starts to fall for over time, and the guy she turns…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:31 PM
1

Tbf I guess it depends, I'd overall agree with the oversall statement But getting a cheerleader type to desire you, vs an average woman is a HUGE difference
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:19 PM
1

Can't believe I had to scroll down this far to see where both the man and woman get OP's point entirely, without dodging the question, misunderstanding it, or smokescreening because either gender didn't want to admit something about themselves 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:17 PM
2

Correct, but I think you're missing the male POV: a lot of guys would be stoked to be seen purely as a hot piece of meat to a lot of women. This sentiment is rarely shared by women though, which likely explains why women see even guys merely talking about women's bodies physically as 'gross and objectifying' but guys are much less likely to care if women do the same to them. "She could even not think you’re attractive but think you fuck her well and then she desires you physically for sex." If s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:14 PM
3

Hahaha EXACTLY what I was thinking! The bar women think is 'not that attractive, but had sex anyway, because apparently there was 'no others available' (also weird, because having 3 men go after you in 2 nights is somehow no pther options available??? Most men, including the hot ones, would be hitting the jackpot if they got as many as 3 women who wanted to bed him in TWO NIGHTS only) and 'very attractive' are not only so damn high already, but the bar is only lowered by about 1cm between 😂 It'd…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:10 PM
1

Ofc they're putting out plausible deniability. The amount of times girls will gaslight about their sexual desires is hilarious 😂 Though tbf, maybe because of the enforced social etiquette (likely mainly by other women) of 'not being a slut,' yet in the age where we have been conditioned since at least the late 2000s to engage in a lot of hookup culture (the main dating apps were literally designed for this since their creation e.g Tinder)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:01 PM
3

Gold is rare, but are you telling me they'd forego having casual sex only with the golden dick, if they couldn't secure said golden dick into a relationship? Because if you think that' you're being a bit naive. Gold is rare, and better to keep forever, but holding gold for a bit is still better than either never being able to hold it, or never keeping it. The equivelant for men would be: I can still imagine many men saying yes to the guarantee of having sex with Sydney Sweeney at least once, IF …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 04:56 PM
0

"im not sure most women want that before having sex, most could want it after" THAT is the point, most women would not have sex with a guy UNTIL the guy agrees not to have casual sex with other people (the correct technical one difference between a hookup and closed relationship, as you pointed out) "but wanting it, at whatever point, indicates more desire than not wanting it at that same point." Well no shit, but then you have to see the other binary: either in likely MOST cases, if he disagree…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 04:50 PM
1

"why would someone who doesnt really care if you sleep around be seen as desiring you more than someone who cant stand to imagine it?" You say you're not missing the point, but where did OP mention this? It's not them caring if you sleep around or not, it's about if they will sleep with you, no strings attached. By 'secure' I obviously meant trust in a steady and healthy relationship, not secure against someone's will ofc. My point is, most women want something more substantive from a man before…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 02:59 PM
3

That... Makes no sense... Do you even know what cuck means? Sexually and otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:23 AM
2

yeah but, just because she might be at that time hormonal, doesn't mean she, or most other women, are going to bang absolutely anything either.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:16 AM
0

I think you're msising OP's point. They're not saying a woman in a monogamous relationship should forfeit her feelings, and let him sleep around, or to trun that relationship into a fwb. They're saying a woman who will just sleep with him, without ever being in a relationship, is the ultimate proof of SMV for men. OP is basing that on the fact that, women usually want to secure a relationship before having sex, so those who choose to have sex casually with a man, is like forefeiting that require…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:14 AM
3

I this mysterious “academic feminism” I had folks compare using chat bots to rape feminists one minute: "consent really isn't that complicated you men!" feminists the next: "talking to a non sentient machine is somehow literally rape!" like, how do they even begin to justify that nonsense? Haha
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 05:28 AM
1

What astounds me the most is some feminists basically don't want us anywhere near them yet in the same breath, care if these men use AI chatbots/sexbots? Even in the cases where the actual creepy men or weirdos really are treating their AI chatbots/sexbots like shit, so? It's not a fucking human, it's not even sentient lol. Would they rather these types keep to their chatbots/sexbots, or depriving them of that, come back to these women? Yeah, I doubt women would want the latter... So why do they…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 05:21 AM
3

assuming she said "men splitting hairs and arguing about numbers does nothing except protect the predators." as well is ironic, because it's precisely the opposite way around if you muddy/makeup the numbers, the actual recorded rapists are going to be much harder to find with a bunch of now translucent/opaque stats. This may as well be as stupid as going "there's a rapist in this city we need to arrest" "ok, where, so we can detain them?" "you're splitting hairs and arguing with me! Just go arre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/26 05:11 AM
1

"What concerns me is that men are filming their partners without their consent, and raping them." No one is saying that's ok? But that's not the entire category either. Most of it is simulated, but within it, some of it is non consensual. "Also, giving tips on how others could do it to their partners; giving advice in what kind of drugs to use etc." Which is the part in the telegram group, not the videos itself... Once again, no one is saying this is right, or not horrific, but that's a group of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 10:43 PM
1

I thought you were done lol? Nw, I'll respond. In actuality someone of any age will try to recreate something they saw in porn really. And you keep missing the point that that is a bit of a false equivalence i.e the equivelant with videogames would be if kids thought a gun game was cool, so they get their toy guns and play shooting instead. Nothing actually violent about that, it's just play. So wanting to reenact general sex acts that are CONSENSUAL is neither an argument that porn apparently c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 09:43 AM
5

Even though the women aren't a majority there, still pretty damning that essentially 1 of 3 women entirely have a negative view of an ideology that's meant to be entirely about them, and for them. Just shows how little that is true as well 😂
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 06:48 AM
5

No shit? But a far cry from saying 'EnOuGh MeN'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/26 05:15 AM
2

Tbf, Tiktok isn't exactly known for nuance or verification haha. Ik it shouldn't be ignored either, as many particularly younger gen z and gen a watches, and even relies a lot on Tiktok for information, but for once I can be happy to be relegated as a 30 year old 'old man' and just laugh at how little they know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 11:21 PM
1

But then it just gets into the pointless subjective claim of 'anything that isn't 0 is bad' well yes, but that doesn't mean we can't see things in proportion, especially to those who always make that dishonest point just to go 'WeLl ItS eNoUgH (to somehow call it most men)' furthermore, it doesn't help their point that there's soooo many misquoted and non nuanced numbers, to the point that it just comes across as being blatantly exaggerating for creating an alterior motive to bash men: 62 millio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 11:15 PM
1

Now THAT is a great question I didn't even think about surprisingly. Idk, I guess for analogy's sake, it's like lighting a large wad of kindling with sparks from a stone: it's unlikely the first will be the one to light the fire, but eventually one spark will let it off.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 10:42 PM
18

Not even in a "We get it and agree, but that's your movement not ours" but instead "That's not a real issue, stop whining" Exactly why I never got why some feminists pretend they also care about men's issues. No they fucking don't 😂 At best, it'll be the usual milquetoast 'patrisrchy hurts everyone!' Which means anything and everything, depending on what was convenient for them at the time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 10:39 PM
7

But I do believe it's got a huge messaging problem and that many feminists let misandry slide too often. And this makes you believe in their principles? An ideology that allows its members to be bigoted to an entire gender (ours) has principles that we should follow? You think they'd have principles that truly are for the best of everyone, as feminists constantly claim they're 'just about equality' (nvm all the different types of feminism, and arguably different definitions of equality, and thei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 10:08 PM
2

It's worse with the fact that those spreading it around don't even have basic literacy though... It's ironically like the crestors of the source got even more compounded fearmongering than they ever dreamed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 10:05 PM
1

Kids try to re-enact the stuff they see in porn which then ends up in convos about men being bad at sex. We're talking about consent, but then you say this? I agree kids do this, but being bad at sex has nothing to do with consent.. If I were to ask a group of a thousand college kids how they feel about hitting their spouse the response is going to be more vibrant than say “crying your way into pussy” which is also wrong. Wtf is even 'crying your way to pussy?' Do you mean being desperate about …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 10:00 PM
25

Not really, it focuses on the exact same article. This woman is angry that numbers became the main factor of debate, but it wasn't the men who started claiming it was the 62 million figure first, that was women She then says the usual "even 1 rape is bad" no shit? But then that's a pointless argument, because any crime more than once is bad, but it's still an unfortunate reality in humanity that crime happens in general, and will likely never be eradicated. 1000 she said was like a 'constituency…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 03:13 PM
37

Shit like this every time, including when this has happened with the ridiculous 'bear and man' thing, has ironically only made me hate feminism more and more. If anything, being shamed and ostracised for merely pointing out the misquoting only makes me feel more staunch and self righteous. Sick of this shit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 03:03 PM
29

Guaranteed they're not angry at the article being incorrect (or rather, they're too stupid and hasty to have read it properly) but angry that we haven't taken the numbers without question, like good little boys. Hence the predictable projection, insults, assumptions etc. Even if we merely go "those people on telegram and those who make actual non consensual porn are monsters, but the numbers are hella exaggerated" They say we're trying to smokescreen the stats, I say they're just trying to find …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 02:56 PM
3

'Non consensual' No, like a lot of porn, it's simulated. There is ofc non consensual content on there too, like all porn, but it's certainly not the entire category, let alone the entire site But seeming you'll just off hat call us 'misogynist' because we won't deepthroat a bunch of unsubstantiated numbers from a sensationalist source, shows you care about nothing but making an excuse to just insult men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 02:48 PM
6

I could see this was a moral panic the moment it was shared on threads, cause of the follow up of "this is why women are scared of men" or some shit. If that's not obvious to why it sounds so ominous, as usual, get rid of it being a gender war and imagine commenters saying instead "this is why white people are scared of black people" yeah, sounds like a moral panic and something ominously generalising and hateful now... Then the algorithm picked up on it, and in the last 2 days it indeed spread …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 01:44 PM
2

No wonder she's your ex then, good call brother 😂 (and if you think I'm being petty, chicks talk shit about their exes all the time)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 11:54 AM
2

Ok? None of which prove that even if there are far less grand theft auto crime cases compared to rape, draw a link or disprove a link between that and influence of the media on those crimes. All you've done is shown that there is a lot more rape than grand theft auto or physical violent crime, which could also be because for starters rape can be anything from some unwanted touching to forced sexual intercourse, and that it tends to happen behind closed doors with the victim being known to the pe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 02:12 AM
6

Ahh yes, because you think women that generalise all of us as monsters at the get go are either reasonable, or somehow trust us anyway? Massive red flag, I don't care for the trust of hateful misandrist women anyway. I have the trust of women who don't hate me for simply being a man anyway Anyhow, where are you types coming out from the woodwork anyway? This is clearly not the relevant subreddit for you... 🙄
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 03:25 PM
3

By that logic, extreme BDSM on the sadism side is normalising torture porn, or just inflicting pain on non consensting people. Before you say "they consent in BDSM" not always, someone could be taken against their will. No different to the sleep porn thing. At worst, it might be harder to make consensual sleep porn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 08:04 AM
3

Do you have evidence that people understand ethics less sexually than they do with violence? Because I don't see how that can be true, it just seems like you're arbitrarily claiming that people inherently understand ethics over violence more than sexuality. Secondly, the moral panic in the 2000s and before on videogame violence, shows that clearly plenty would've disagreed with you that there wasn't a link between violence in videogames and violence irl, and these games were being played by kids…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 02:01 AM
3

says the one who comes on a subreddit that's clearly not ideal for them to moan, and gets 2 comments banned by reddit for personal attacks in a row 😂 It's clearly you that's acting bitter...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 04:46 AM
2

Hahahah, I didn't think about that 😂 That or they go: "It should be zero!" (Like no shit, but not exactly possible, or part of the point) "You caring about it 'only' being 1000 makes you part of the problem!" (despite you yourself, trying to sensationalise the numbers just to give you more ammo for yoir misandry? That's not a problem?)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 04:43 AM
3

Tbf, I'd expect them to be a tad less sensationalist with their gender war stuff than say Buzzfeed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 04:39 AM
3

It's more like whatsapp, but more encrypted, more clandestine, and apparently owned by Russia. It's like Reddit in that sense, you can make any username. People use it anywhere from more innocuous reasons, like wanting privacy away from metadata or government keylogging I guess. To more 'innocuous illegal activity' like organising with friends on their next drug session. Or in this case, basically facilitating rape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 04:37 AM
1

100% on everything there But they never do that, and they never learn, continue on with the nauseating cycle 🙄 (and after all that, it'll be yet another forgotten chapter in the gender war, like the patently stupid man and bear shite)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 04:34 AM
3

Yeah, not sure why these basic misandrist comments are making their way onto this post. I've had about 3 now in the last ~24 hours. Maybe it's because of my keywords and citing something that's becoming yet another gender moral panic, but I rarely expect these comments on this subreddit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 04:33 AM
3

"It ShOuLd Be ZeRo" Yes, all crime should be zero, we shouldn't fight wars, we should be one united species, make first contact with Vulcans, and go on a Star Trek. Doesn't mean it can be done... It isn't anywhere near a majority of men, and this article shouldn't be used simply as ammo against all men, fullstop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 04:31 AM
4

Ok then, go piss off somewhere else then, because why should I listen to you? 😂 I think you're on the wrong subreddit... Imagine writing paragraphs to defend men who drug and rape their wives. y'all are so yuck it's amazing. Annnnnd the assumptive projection that no one mentioned whatsoever. So predictable. Once again, if you hate men so much, post your shite on subreddits like two x chromosomes, cause I promise you no one cares for your bitterness here, you're not the victim of the entire world…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 05:46 PM
7

We want justice And you think smearing all men, pretending we're all collectively guilty, and acting like every second guy is a rapist/potential rapist is justice in any meaning of the word? Because that's how feminists use these moral panics every time... It's basically why this subreddit exists
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 05:39 PM
5

So you read the full post and you think thousands of cases of people drugging their wives and doing is okay? You really don't bother reading properly, do you? Where did this guy even insinuate that? You think I'm saying all 62 million viewers only watched videos of it really happening? But that's just the thing, it counts only for viewers of the category in general, which would include simulated content. What would be more 'interesting' is working out from there which content in that category is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 05:34 PM
10

No, sorry, but you don't get sympathy if you unfairly and disgustingly broad brush all men, that's not how that works, and I'm tired of that entitled attitude. If anything it's not sympathetic to the victims, using it as a weapon to broad brush all men, clearly shows nothing but a cynical excuse for political ammunition, by even non victimised women, and distracts from the issue. If you want people to listen, don't fucking attack them. Why should I care what someone has to say if they treat me l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 05:30 PM
5

It actually kind of gives credence to the sex negative/anti-porn crowd. There's coercion; incest, teacher/student sex, sleeping subjects, you name it. Another one that I'm just now remembering is "Black Patrol" where female cops force detainees to have sex if they want freedom. The detainees are exactly the demographic you are thinking of. Does it? As long as like from what you've said below: "put a message in the beginning explaining that the acts shown are unethical as well as make believe." w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 12:09 AM
1

I did already, hence what I said. I think I just got the numbers slightly confused. Tbf it is written generally as well, which is also part of the problem, and I'm pretty sure done on purpose
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 12:04 AM
15

My apologies, tbf I only had a quick skim of it, but alreasy the numbers were vastly overstated, and you've correctly pointed out all the other holes as well, But that doesn't stop these types from going with it still, to bash all men 🙄
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 11:41 AM
1

Wow, I largely understood Louis' quote there, but it's still a word salad and a half 😂 That's also my problem with ANY discourse against male issues, like how goddamn dismissive is that? "My brother was homeless, constantly crying, hungry, probably nothing going for him, and then killed himself" to then respond "well ackually u wrong and it's CaPiTaLiSm AnD aLgOrItHm" But when it's women giving ANY sob story, even if it's like straight up 1st world problems, we're supposed to sit down, shut up, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 07:30 AM
2

Everytime with this shit. How it literally goes down: Feminists when the media is about broad brushing all men, 'collective guilt,' comparing animals like bears as better than us, tresting us like threats to be curfewed/locked up etc., demonising any and all men that 'dare' say they're struggling or feel lonely: ✅️ Feminists when the media is about an ex feminist woman decides to no longer be a feminist, and sees the merit in some male issues: ❌️❌️❌️ Moral panics are always the dumbest thing, be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 07:21 AM
5

(Paraphrased): - they blame us all for some of the inbalances some men get - also then try to say the men that do badly is also because of patriarchy - they might even try and say women in power continuing the enforce the system is still patriarchy etc. Without even being facetious, this is why I use the term 'schrodingers patriarchy' because they'll claim patriarchy when it benefits AND denigrates men, even vice versa on both ends! This is also why I ask feminists who just bandy this term with …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 06:45 AM
8

Also, don't women usually whine that they apparently say whatever we want to hear, like we're such a pain to them? So by that logic, they 'rape us' just as much as we do them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 05:51 AM
1

I can guarantee somebody thinks you’re “toxic,” and same for myself. I agree, but not everyone is considered toxic to an equal amount of people. Like the saying goes "meet an asshole, and you've met an asshole, meet many assholes, and you're likely the asshole"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 12:14 AM
0

sure, but that's not what I meant either
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 12:12 AM
-1

On point actually! But to some degree, as you said with most men simping to some level, it's arguably natural, as we tend to be the pursuiters and wooers in most human societies in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 03:32 PM
2

Yeah, I guess I can agree, at least most of the time. If you look carefully, you can see the forest for the trees, but I'll admit most people aren't obvious either way from the outset.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 12:36 PM
11

I think they mean overtly i.e practically seeing, or meeting someone briefly, and they basically ooze 'assholeness' which is possible, and therefore doesn't require someone reporting their attitude, when you can see it plainly yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 11:21 AM
0

It’s correct enough of the time for people to stereotype. I have trouble believing you don’t understand this. Disproportionately at most. It may as well be like the unfortunate reality of say "most pedophiles/rapists happen to be men" which while true, that is nowhere near the same thing as claiming "most men are pedophiles/rapists" Similarly, maybe unless if the younger person has been abused, or is as young as 18/19 then I seriously don't think age gaps automatically mean a malicious power inb…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 03:53 PM
-2

What is 'close to their age' though? Because some people are even weird about mere 5 year age gaps... Secondly, it's also more common for women to date older, but that's rsrely shamed. It's only really shamed when men date younger. So it's a bit like if x person wants to date you, that's fine, but if you accept x's proposal, then it's not fine, but only from your side???
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:08 PM
2

I don't deny that there are women out there like that, I've experienced that myself, but I will deny that it's somehow every woman. The only thing I'd agree with you on more generally, is communication is probably not as often as direct with women as you can with guy friends. The flipside however is, women are also more emotionally intelligent and varied, which makes them more understanding, and empathic. Most dudes are shit at expressing their feelings, even simply saying they have an issue wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 12:48 PM
7

Nah man, that's a shit way to view relationships, and not fair for either of you, if you just boil it down for sex. If she's a good match, in her own way, all those things can be just as fun with her, as with yoir friends. If anything, friends aren't always around, an SO will be far more so
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:38 AM
1

Yeah, where's my patriarchy awards card already??? Looking forward to doing a bit of misogynist oppression! /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 01:38 AM
5

I believe all that will be lost on them lmao They go on about how people bandy terms like 'socialism' around, without knowing what it means. Which is true, but it's also hilarious that they think just because college students can serve up a lot of word salad on the THEORIES of socialism/communism, that they know better. Yeah, the same types that ignore the lived experiences of those who were in living memory of living in Communist nations (ironic that they always tell us to 'sit down, and listen…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 07:45 PM
0

not sure how putting in my standards gets me downvoted, but when she does, it gets her upvoted...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 05:55 AM
1

Sorry, I don't understand your criticism of my point? I'm only saying I understand why the man doesn't get to decide only in relation to the period of time the baby develops and is birthed, unless if you're an anti abortionist type, which I'm not, partially because it's a bad slippery slope and would require overriding the woman's decision on her own body BUT I agree with you where, the hypocrisy of 'you don't get to decide if we have the child or not' is suddenly flipped when the child is born,…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 03:22 AM
0

I can understand the logic that it's because it's a woman doing the literal labour of developing and then birthing baby in 9 months, so it's a bigger deal by far than what feminists point out is otherwise just 'cumming in her' But that argument arguably becomes moot once the child is born. For example, why should an accidental pregnancy that the father said was also accidental since day 1, have to sacrifice some form of themselves and/or their assets to bringing up a child he never wanted, but s…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 02:40 AM
0

Same goes for me, they're not a viable partner if they don't let me go down on them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 10:07 PM
2

Haha, you sound like a very reasonable and fun partner to have, I won't lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 09:55 PM
1

depends how you define 'prime,' when mention prime they mean when a woman is most desired by other men. Men also have this prime with women, though I believe the age range is wider
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 11:45 PM
1

Ikr? Not too many guys won't go down on their woman entirely mind you, but I'd say I've met a handful like that still? Tbf as well, there've been a decent amount of girls I know who say their bf does go down on them, but not for very long at all, and maybe half heartedly, I think that's far more common, and what contributes to the orgasm gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 10:06 PM
1

Oohh, yeah that's fair. As you can see I'm a slightly redder pill (I see as swinging more pro man) but don't believe in TRP much at all, or at least find them too sweeping and simplistic. I can say for sure though, a shit tonne of young 20s men are kinda like that fuckboi type. There's a reason there's the old fashioned saying "young, dumb, and full of cum" I have a mate who sort of still thinks that way in his mid 20s, one of the types who doesn't go down on his gf, and I told him he should, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:51 PM
3

Still seems like a contradiction though. Like how can you essentially feel love at first sight, yet not consider him special? Say he's the only one in the world your heart burns for, yet admit there are other guys you could find like him? Each to their own I guess, as long as you're happy, this Psychotyrant guy is annoyijgly presumptious anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:48 PM
1

Oh ok, that is weird then. I'm 30, and in my relationships I've always been happy to spend time with my girlfriend, go on adventures with her, or sometimes just errands with her. At most I'd physically flirt with her a bit and give her lots of kisses, but I wouldnt try and speedrun everything to go to the bedroom all the time. If anything that almost seems disrespecting, like they only ultimately see you sexually. Dare I ask, are you with the right person?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:44 PM
1

That's a bit of a contradiction, isn't it? If he's your soulmate, how would that not be at least subjectively special to you? (can you really be objectively special tbf?) Otherwise, it wouldn't read as yoir soulmate
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:39 PM
1

How old are you and your bf? I only ask because I don't know many guys who act like this, except when I remember like early 20s and younger probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:35 PM
1

I can understand religious programming, maybe stereotypes getting in the way, but embarrassment? Tbf, don't women tend to be more comfortable talking about sexuality, at least with eachother , compared to men with eachother? At least with masturbation, I definitley know that most men won't talk about their own masturbation with eachother. There are certainly selfish guys, but there are also guys that try their best, think they're doing good, but really aren't being told the truth. They'd be some…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 01:30 PM
-1

Good point, I'm more bi curious, but the girls I've been with seem to think I'm better going down on them than 'purely' straight guys. Though yeah, even when I ask some of these girls in turn what makes them feel good, they don't always say anything, or even when I tell them my ego is irrelevant and to tell me honestly, they claim I'm doing ok already (I dont always believe that, and unfortunately sometimes think some of them are conditioned to claim I'm doing well automatically) So I essentiall…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 08:41 AM
2

a lot of my friends dont enjoy sex when their partner stops wooing her oitside of the bedroom and starts flat out demanding sex Do you mean, as in: for my previous partners (I'm single atm) I always doted on them outside of the bedroom, always said how beautiful they were, always kissed them, gave them gifts etc. Then I'd never just launch into sex, I'd be more than happy to take her pace with foreplay, make out sessions, always go down on her for a long time before anything else. Is that what y…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 08:37 AM
2

I don't actually disagree with this, but women could solve that issue by communicating with their partners though. They usually don't. Not saying men are necessarily better at communicating, in fact I'd say much of millennials and gen Z are shit at communicating as generations in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 08:32 AM
1

Red-purple isn't just red, do you not understand words???
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:41 PM
0

"Magenta is a purplish-red colour" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magenta But the fact you're even trying to start an argument on colours now, not even slightly relevant to what we were talking about before... 🤦 I know your exact types, the self-righteous, sanctimonious, buzz kills, who are so insufferable they will literally argue about nothing to get some way. I bet you don't get invited to much, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 01:37 AM
0

Magenta is a slightly redder version of purple, but not entirely red...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:47 PM
0

Not even a redpill... Dude even my flair says so, you're really not too bright, are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:26 PM
0

Like here, you basically just gave a reductive reply to my long paragraph. Have fun pretending patriarchy is around every dark alleyway...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:07 AM
0

Lol you really are bad faith, and just fire out everything 😂 mod warned me, and deleted one of your comments, so at this rate I can't be bothered talking to a ranting activist much more, who just throws out any and all accusations...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 03:06 AM
0

And that's the point... Schrodingers Patriarchy if you will, if it affects women badly it's patriarchy which is also somehow the responsibility of all men. But if we point out things that hurt men in a supposed male ruled society (a contradiction) that's also patriarchy conveniently. Somehow men get the overall benefit of this patriarchy though, that I'm yet to get these apparent benefits of... 🙄 And it's not us that use the stupid term to be us vs them, everytime it's feminists to either broad …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 10:36 PM
0

Which once again, was a HYPOTHETICAL that mirrored your stupid sweeping generalisation My god, imagine missing the obvious point so hard
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 10:33 PM
0

Yeah, in some states, not the entire country, that is controversial too... You also realise this has nothing to do with rape now. You jump from one thing to the next...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 10:32 PM
3

And funny how 'patriarchy' only exists to you when they're doing badly out of something, or when something bad happens to men, they want to pretend it's them hurting themselves...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 02:05 PM
0

"Everyone I disagree with is a red piller"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:12 PM
–

Once again, just because you don't want to admit your shitty example being mirrored isn't accurate, isn't my problem, but you types have 0 self awareness...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:12 PM
0

Nothing too much to be upset about systematically... you're high if you think that's anywhere the line of saying I dont care about women getting raped, but then again I'm pretty sure I'm talking to one of those pretentious type activists....
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:11 PM
2

I agree with that, but that's more about different treatment on sexuality, not gender so much
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 10:07 AM
3

>literally calls someone else's experience in the same community, that doesn't fit his preconceived expectations, as 'calling bullshit' Would you also call bullshit, that most of my gay friends (and I have many, including been in many of those spaces myself) say how exclusive, cliquey, and superficial the LGBT community can be? Because you're making a fine example of that here...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 07:50 AM
3

I didn't say it compared, I did say it's still a big deal that is often overlooked. That also includes being on the birth certificate as the father, and if finding out years later that that child isn't yours, you can still be enforced to pay alimony
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 07:18 AM
4

what equivelant rights would men have compared to that? We can't give birth after all. In states where it is legal, women can choose whether to abort the child or not, without notifying the father. I'm not against abortion at all, but you can see how that would still hit the father hard
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 05:31 AM
–

it was an example dipshit, oh so you found my hypothetical example rather reductive, generalised, largely an incorrect generalisation, and offensive? congratulations you got the point
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 03:05 AM
8

no, no you didn't call out sex abusers, you literally wrote it as generalised as possible, don't play dumb with me... If you were actually even a touch nuanced, you'd have a point, but me going "the women started the war" and you going "no they didn't" while essentially throwing that grenade in that has a lot of collaterol, really isn't the point you think it was... But yeah tell me again how you're a boy scout but also don't think rapists should be punished Like where the fuck did this come fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 03:04 AM
3

Being mildly unhappy and divorcing is almost always preferable to being unhappy and remaining in the relationship. Divorce is not the only, or even worse, way for a relationship to fail. Quite right, but how does any of that still make divorce a good thing, as a lot in our generation also think? Two realities can be true simeltaneously: it's good we can divorce fault free, and with little to no judgement away from a toxic/failing relationship; and the high rate of divorce is bad. You know, we ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 02:48 AM
1

...OP didn't say all women... Also his source was anecdotal, because he was accused of only being online. So nice slew of projections you've got there
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:35 AM
2

if you divorce, it can entirely be deduced that the relationship wasn't happy though... Sure it's a good thing to have countries where divorcing isn't shamed or considered a social suicide, but when people practically 'celebrate' high levels of divorce too, by simply focusing on the freedom of such, and not looking at the fact that it's still indicative of failed relationships is entirely glossing over the point... There's no intellectual or rational basis for any of the conclusions you drew. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 01:31 AM
6

also kind of proving my point there Most men who don't rape: Women post metoo movement to the above: "stop raping us! And give us rights! (What rights in the west don't they have by now that men have?)" Most men who don't rape: "???" But sure, it's not gross and dumb to broad brush all of us? This isn't fighting dirty according to you? You call bringing in gay issues gross, despite OP showing a link with heteorsexual relations through the microcosm of gay relationships, but you don't call the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:56 AM
2

I see, fair point
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:52 AM
2

you can still catch up though, plenty did, but now they're not. It's still measuring every year regardless, 'ick girls' years or not. You're also assuming that all boys are failing at the same time, some may fail earlier on, some later on.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:50 AM
4

ok, I won't claim you're wrong off hat ofc, but you could at least elaborate on your logic for knowing how you know OP is likely straight?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:29 AM
4

how does any of this invalidate OP's point? If anything it just deflects by going "well gays have open relationships, straight don't usually like that!" Sure, what does that have to do with the all the pitfalls of lesbian relationships OP has highlighted then? I’m sure that relieves a lot of “I’m annoyed by partner” tension. Clearly not for lesbians there Anyway, I will say that females over-index on neuroticism. So they would much rather be romantically single than in a romantic relationship th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:26 AM
2

well hence the 'too' but point is, even you acknowledge the data isn't just taken in the phase of school life where boys are in the 'ick girls' phase, but throughout schooling life and beyond.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:23 AM
4

among school age boys still in their "eww girls are icky" phase Not really, because these facts are usually taken with boys in high school too/only, and also measured by the fact that far less men are getting degrees than women on average now, which is naturally after school. High school boys are certainly not in the 'eww girls are icky' phase lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:03 AM
4

and then it goes to that reductive nonsense yes, most rape on women is committed by men, and more women are likely to get raped than men but it's also equally just as true that there are very few male rapists in general. So bandying around this accusation every time someone says anything in the gender war, is lazily deflective, and is just about as meaningless as if a man turned around and said "well men demand women stop being so disloyal by initiating divorces more, and taking away what we wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 11:56 PM
6

They're still men and women, and are still treated as such in terms of their gender society over. Once again, these stats reflect that
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 10:15 PM
2

The whole gender war thing is gross and dumb Yet, complaining about how dirty and brutal the trenches are isn't going to change shit. You fight with what you have, and it's arguably women that started this war, hence the never ending AND empowered digs at men they constantly make online, as top comments. A lot of this likely coming during and after the metoo era, which also ties in well with the time when Twitter gender activism became larger, and Tumblr was a thing. Don't want shit? Don't start…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 10:14 PM
7

What makes you think gay people aren't just as much in this gender war using the same stats? You may be right, but how could you possibly know? OP could also be gay after all
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 10:11 PM
4

So much this lol, and precisely because of what you said, about the narrative always being: men are the brutes that need to be mothered; women are always the better communicators and more emotionally mature (or that whole stupid chestnut claiming women mentally mature faster than men); the LGBT factor (which is true, but as you pointed out, gay men go through the same/worse) etc. Let's not forget the stats with lesbian DV is surprisingly high too, so they also can't assume men are necessarily mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 10:08 PM
1

you're msising my point. If they were married, they'd be next of kin, and the family could not prevent either one from visiting
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:36 AM
2

I already said you didn't, but afaik making things official makes things a little easier to divide up, perhaps? I do know there are other legal issues that can occur though I've heard of say, gay defacto partners, where one became very sick and had to go to the hospital for awhile. Due to not being married and therefore next of kin however, the sick person's family (who'd be next of kin in this case now) who happened to be homophobic, refused the defacto man's man into the hospital, and he had n…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:33 AM
11

I've always seen marriage (or can see it as) a milestone to celebrate, like a capstone to your relationship, not a substitute for love (though some foolish people do use it as a substitute) this is why some people call it the 'happiest day of their life.' Defacto relationships, at least after a long time, can still involve the law in matters of splits though I believe, just that marriage formalises things a bit better and can therefore at least make the legal rammifications of split up a lot 'cl…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 06:36 AM
1

Certain women-centric subreddits don't even want women who disagree with them there So much for female solidarity, hey? Haha
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 12:23 AM
7

Doss warns that "using unsubstantiated statistics for advocacy is counterproductive." Bad data not only undermine credibility, they obstruct progress by making it impossible to measure change. I guarantee you, they 100% know that they're using dodgy numbers, but push it anyway, because it's within their agenda. Advocacy is essentially activism in a more organised/lobbyist way after all. I entirely agree with the experts saying this distortion helps no one, and have been saying this for ages, but…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/26 11:00 PM
1

I generally agree with your statement, but, especially when I was in my 20s as an undergrad, women would actually choose the clearly clueless/selfish lovers. Your point on looks makes no sense either, because you can have good looking men who are good at sex too. There's a reason the lads who are selfish af, and pump and dump are called 'fuckboys' and yet, they usually got the sex simply because they had no shame, and would approach any girl as unsubtly as possible. So simply put, for both gende…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 02:17 PM
2

I'm not saying otherwise This isn't an example of one of them though. Or is, only in the near singular example feminists have made here specifically, only.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 04:00 PM
18

That isn't to say that women don't have problems, but that only about 0.1% of men have "male privilege." It's not really "male privilege" at all, it's wealthy/pretty privilege. It's the equivalent of looking at a male billionaire and telling a homeless man he has it easy. And it seems most people are completely unaware that they're doing this. THIS, this is what I always think when feminists constantly ask for quotas with comfortable office jobs, or more so, executive boardrooms. Curiously no fe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:13 AM
1

are you just going to pointlessly repeat yourself, and keep shifting the blame? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 11:01 PM
1

Imagine essentially seppuku blackpilling yourself, just to apparently 'own all men' you're resentful
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 11:05 AM
1

And this is what women like you always do, avoid accountability. Once again, you started it. Yawn, now stop fucking spamming my notifs and piss off
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 10:34 AM
1

"That's the problem, you assume" -accusation. Literally in response to you saying to OP "All you do is make accusations and pass the blame" An accusation AND assumption. How fucking thick are you? If you don't want to be accused yourself, don't accuse in the first place. "Being nice to people isn't helping them" depends on the stiuation, but throwing baseless assumptions and accusations sure as shit won't, especially when it's inaccurate. Good thing, as I said, I don't listen to rude bitches lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 01:21 AM
0

Nope, I'm not doing anything, but simply talking to you. People don't assume bad about me, but I know types like you that think they should always dominate the conversation, and talk over others, are far less liked.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 08:55 PM
3

get over yourself lol, you had no bar, because you rigged the game from the start, it may as well have not existed
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 02:08 AM
1

"Women of Reddit are not interested in helping men, they are more interested in abusing and bullying them" if anything, it's saying women are shitting on men... If you want to admit that you were wrong and apologize, we can talk. If not, there is zero reason to speak with you. Tbh you already showed your massive bias before by acting like only the men are bad actors in this group, so I really couldn't care less if you play ball or not. No use playing ball with a wall
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 11:45 PM
0

They aren't. Great rebuttal lol. Each to their own, but definitley not what I've seen on here. And yes, how dare I call out men for their behavior and actions. Do then, but you're clearly being biased by assuming only men have bad behaviours and actions in this group. And did you read the title where the op called out women. In a non attacking way... Show me where in any part of his long post was he being insulting, or denigrating women? Because it seems like you didn't. Your comment is embarras…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 10:17 PM
-2

and all you do is make accusations and pass blame. That's the problem, you assume men asking for help are only accusing and passing blame, before they've even spoken. Yet you wonder why people likely don't come to you for aid. You seriously think anyone is going to ask you for help, if you give them a negative assumption from the get go, and don't listen to them first?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 10:12 PM
1

Mod team, not sure how my non insulting interpretation is an insult or ad hominem... At best it's an incorrect assumption, but an assumption still doesn't have to be an ad-hominem or insult
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 10:10 PM
1

Metaphorically, perhaps, every other way, no. Plenty of men who somehow managed to get a decent amount of sex, were some of the most immature insufferable shits I ever knew. That, and for once taking the woman's pov here, a lit of young men are outright shit with sex. It's almost sad, but some women I so much as simply went down on were thankful that I did, claiming most young men are either shit at going down, or don't bother at all. Remember as well, and I'm not condoning this, but a fair few …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 04:21 AM
0

My message to men who need help: talk less and listen more. Man: "I need help" Women: "shut up and listen" I don't even know of budget therapists that would think this is a good idea for ANYONE...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 01:43 AM
–

Demonstrably her reply would say, yes, it is too much for her to ask 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 01:42 AM
3

Acting like women aren't doing precisely the same on this subreddit... Also irrelevant point, as OP was not shitting on any gender, but it's quite telling that you immediately pointed the finger at men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 01:40 AM
2

Yep, it's one thing and predictable hearing this anti man feminist trite in this day and age But the fact that if we even say a peep independently about our own issues, you get that parodical crap about "men are scared to be rejected, women are scared to be murdered" yes because there's apparently a stat there saying women are super likely to get murdered for simply saying 'no' come off it 🙄. What's worse, is I'm even seeing this shit permeate into my apolitical friend groups, including groups I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/26 08:46 AM
5

They do that over many subjects on gender though, I've lost count 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 08:41 AM
1

I see both your points, but she's essentially saying danger and sexuality aren't connected, they can easily be made mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:31 AM
1

Won't stop her from making more of a deluge of projections though lol. Every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:29 AM
16

This is a pretty facetious non comment to a legit question from someone though... Also answers absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:28 AM
1

Yes, and celebrities would count for the top 20% in the 80:20 phenomenon here... Runway models certainly, absolutely use plastic surgery, and clearly a lot of people, men included, find them hot, or else they wouldn't be models. Same with celebrities, sure not all of them are conventionally attractive, but most tend to be considered such, which is usually part of their fame. Those that don't? Could still easily attract women through status, power, and/or money anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 10:26 AM
5

I won't lie, but I feel I'd be conditioned similarly, and ik that's bad. Like I'd probably react if a man was bashing a woman, maybe less likely if the woman was bashing the man but Idk why it'd be my business to film it, let alone be a dick to laugh... One guy even joined in on hitting him too... So this goes beyond just simply action vs negligence, this is action vs going out of your way to ridicule and/or join in on the victim...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/26 06:55 AM
2

The vast majority of regular people will never even be in the same room as a runway model. I mean just 'standard' models as well, otherwise your example wouldn't work, because if you're talking about the miss universes and all, they won't be going to 'standard' clubs like the rest of us, or just in their own VIP partys anyway... To keep regular people out lol And to make themselves look good for women, because they're splashing shit tonnes of money for drinks and reserve
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 06:31 AM
2

there are still continually more young people who can vote each year, even if it is a trickle, while old people are finite as they die off. I can't speak for other 1st world countries, but in my country of Australia, the last federal election last year, was the first to have more millennial and gen z voters than boomers for once. The results staggeringly showed too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 05:17 AM
1

and regular people often try and flock to runway models much more, before then settling for everyday people. I see that in Friday nights as well. Why do you think VIP sections exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 05:07 AM
2

only because they don't have the balance of power, but already older gens are dying off, and more youths are coming of voting age
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 04:01 AM
2

the Tinder source is within 10 years... Nevertheless, just because it's old doesn't mean it's debunked. You need a source to prove it's debunked... Again, OLD is trash. If you're gonna go to a dump, expect to find trash. It's a microcosm of the dating market, unless if you want to pretend most users aren't human, and are not acting on their own desires? Also whether we like it or not, most people use OLD these days, and go on there as their main source for finding partners, especially for gen z
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:59 AM
3

Again, men have the same choices as women. Men can hit on whoever they want. Just as women can reject anyone they want. They can hit on whoever they want, doesn't mean they'll succeed. Women are the choosers. Few cultures in general have it the other way around The hard part is never knowing how someone will react to a "no". The hard part is having your day interrupted because some dude had to let you know that he thinks you're so beautiful and he never does this and blah blah blah. Horrible, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:56 AM
2

There was a recent study called Are Men Intimidated by Highly Educated Women? Undercover on Tinder which analyzed the differences between male and female behavior on Tinder. The study demonstrated the men liked 61.9% of women on Tinder and women liked a mere 4.5% of men on Tinder. This study is illustrative of the fact that women are the selectors of sexual selection, made evident by Charles Darwin in The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. This advantage is further corroborated in…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:52 AM
2

hahaha since when was it debunked? Good for you, not a really relevant point. Types like you are never really in good faith are you? I seriously don't get why you bother going into a bipartisan debate group, if you act dismissive, assumptive, and childish at your opponent...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:45 AM
2

Challenges can be fun. 🤷 Idk what else there is to say. Fine, but clearly for those types it can't suck either Men have choices. What's out of touch is acting like men don't have choices or autonomy. Again, where have I said they don't have choices? I said most men get much less choice compared to most women No, it's not easy to continually reject men because they think you're pretty. Lol, you haven't said how. But once again, what's so hard about literally just saying 'no?' Sure there are pushy…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:41 AM
1

So did women invent "sowing his wild oats", "boys will be boys", "don't have the playa hate the game", and all the other phrases that speak to men having hoe phases. There's a huge difference between promoting a lifestyle, and actually getting to engage in it though, as my point also made clear. Just because some of y'all don't have hoe phases doesn't mean that's the case for all men. Again, most men don't get to engage in that. Ever heard of that 80:20 principle? Yeah, that's not most by defini…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:36 AM
2

so much this precisely why I think modern feminism is so fucking stupid. 1st and 2nd wave feminism may have had some sort of revenge sentiment, we're all human, but it was at least actively engaging very real tangible problems women were facing. Many of these feminists didn't necessarily have a 'men suck' attitude either, some may have even encouraged working with men to achieve equality. Now what is it? A movement where women think not many women choosing to do engineering is some sort of socia…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:34 AM
3

where's the data for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:29 AM
5

they aren't having it with chad tho, they're having it with average everyday men. What makes you think that? But even if true, they're still the ones getting that choice, and taking it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:22 AM
2

Dating is supposed to be a challenge. Dating is supposed to suck and be hard. Explain those types then, I'd argue usually women, who claim dating in general is 'fun' almost as a hobby? I came across those types both on OLD and speed dating. Why? Because you're trying to find someone who you like and who likes you back and you both want the same thing is challenging. And more choice in general, means more proportionate chance of finding that compatible person, and women far more often get more ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:18 AM
2

The fact that women themselves coined the term 'hoe phase' for deciding to just 'let go' and fuck all the men they desire, where unless if you're pretty much a male model (and even then, you'd need to arguably be a little more than that to get it) men simply don't get to have 'hoe phases' even if they tried haha. That's all part of it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:14 AM
4

tbf, I get your point and it makes sense. But statistically having more choice, means having more potential good partners (by your standards) So let's assume a man and a woman both have 10% suitors they like (and naturally not all of them will like you back) but statistically the man might only get 10 people who like them, and the woman 100. That turns into 1 suitor who the man likes and feels compatible with, but a whole 10 for women. It's almost guaranteed though that both genders are going to…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 01:30 AM
5

fair enough, I naturally can't see all of OP's comments, only their main post. Not sure why I got downvoted for asking the question though...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 11:52 PM
0

What has he said that's degrading?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:37 PM
1

That's your problem then. Either way, I've given examples of many other female celebrities you asked for.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:29 AM
1

Ashley Graham, Demi Lovato, Tess Holliday, Rebel Wilson, Aidy Bryant are all fat acceptance types too, with varying levels of hypocirsy. Amy Schumer is probably the more obvious example of another outright hypocrite when it comes to fat acceptance though, along with many other character flaws. I never said Lizzo is women in general either, but celebrities dont just become popular out of a vacuum either, they require a lot of popular support, and many women support Lizzo and her views
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:10 AM
1

I literally just said "she wasn't the only female celebrity to do this either"... She's also a very influential figure, with far more projection therefore than the average individual (as is the case for all celebrities) I'd disagree there was at least enough backlash, and the fact this hypocrutical shit under the so called 'fat acceptance movement' went on for years, arguably shows there was more general support than backlash. Nevertheless, you asked what examples of hypocritical body positive w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 11:09 PM
1

Lizzo did that. Always went on about that people should just accept her size, despite factually being very unhealthily obese. This is despite the allegations from her staffers that she bodyshamed them, and THEN Lizzo all of a sudden conveniently webt quiet on her body positivity and massively lost weight, usually not long after Ozempic came out, just as Ozempic largely silenced this stupid 'fat acceptance movement.' She's by far not the only female celebrity to do that as well. So yes, she's hyp…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 10:21 PM
8

How are you defining 'drama' then?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 10:23 AM
7

There's a huge difference between just plain drama and excitement though... This may as well be the equivelant of someone saying you can't have fun at a secure theme park, until you've tried the danger of throwing yourself off a cliff. Utter nonsense, people who think this way are immature, out of touch, and often stupid. Being spontaneous, romantic, travelling the world, doing new things etc. Are all forms of excitement that DON'T require drama. Boring and often destructive immature shit tends …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 10:22 AM
1

Saying one is hard But I'd say as broadly in one area as possible, women being on average a lot more emotional than men is often seen as a double edged sword, but I think it's vastly a good thing: women talk more than skin deep about emotions therefore, they don't mind bwing sappy and know the legit powerful and healing feeling of romance and love, they will generally show that they care for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 10:18 AM
1

Yeah, I was in line with agreeing with you at first, despite it being generalising on all men, over clearly just the deadbeats But women don't divorce for no reason? Pull the other one 😂 for starters most divorces are initiated by women, so you're even more biased: claiming the minority divorcing first (men) are being selfish, but conveniently the majority initiating divorced (women) 'always have a reason' which is another entirely broad generalisation. Have you perhaps considered you're project…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 10:10 AM
1

There are still vast plains of mediocrity between buttugly and attractive. You're not wrong, but most people statistically are in that broad area, and clearly most people, even in many countries with falling birth rates, get into relationships. To have an average woman truely attracted to me (read as lusting upon me), that seems to be impossible goal for me (and for at least 80% of guys imo) That's just doomer pill stuff imo. Once again, most people are still getting into relatioships. If you're…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:43 AM
1

then if you're not butt ugly, then why do you say you don't have the potential to be attractive? What's your personality like? Because even having a somewhat interesting personality, and vague confidence should still get you someone, with average looks. I wouldn't want a golddigger either
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 06:45 AM
1

wait, is your assumption from how you're writing this, that you claim you're butt ugly, but rich?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 05:41 AM
0

Potential =/= the only exclusive ones who can get into a relationship though. That's like saying, only talented people in something can do well. It helps, but it's certainly no prerequisite. I'm not saying looks don't matter either, but you can easily shine through with personality, confidence, money etc. Why do you think so many butt ugly millionaires still have hot women with them? Same with the 'average, but witty funny guy.' Statistically it's also true that there's someone for everyone as w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:36 PM
3

Reminds me of the same whenever that tiresome buzzword 'patriarchy' is used as well. For example: "the men at the more male orientated construction site, I sometimes overhear them talking about how sexy some woman was that they met at the bar. I as a woman felt uncomfortable about that, the fact men are that empowered to be that bolshy shows inherent patriarchy in our system!" "men are sometimes deprived of their rights over custody with their children (ok this fortunately doesn't happen so ofte…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/26 06:01 AM
1

There's a difference between not being attracted, and being attracted enough though. I've heard plenty of times people saying "s/he's pretty hot and nice, but insert a whole slew of often times unrealistic expectstions" Statistically it's unlikely she didn't find any men attractive in NINE events, especially on average when men tend to outnumber the women at these events. So what is it going to solve? Either be more realistic in expectations to those men you ARE attracted to, or work on yourself…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:04 AM
2

It's funny though, because if these pages and apps were strictly about making sure they're not dating cheating men, or actual dangerous/toxic men, there'd absolutely be no issue with that, in fact I'd encourage it. But the fact that it mainly devolves into back chatting about men on small supposedly 'red flags' they exhibit (that term is used so often, and usually so incorrectly, it's just yet another dilute to shit meaning) doxxing them unfairly, and essentially making hypocritical insults on t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 12:41 AM
5

and would probably make sensationalist headlines "male harassment groups found online, will men ever be safe?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 12:29 AM
–

Yeah that's fair, with one other point though: And yes, being percieved as a threat when you don't have any threatening intwntions hurt. But also remember, it's them and not you. Maybe so, but some people can't help it. Like a naturally large, bulky, hairy man, might be considered more likely to be perceived as a threat, when they might actually be the sweetest guys ever (seen many of these examples, almost a stereotype at this point). How do they stop looking like a perceived threat then, if it…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:40 PM
2

Very good comments and I entirely agree. Upvoted
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 01:34 PM
0

but it is ushally the rational brain who decides if it is worth to risk it. What's wrong with risk analysis? You're acting like making a faith based guess is better than giving the time to analyse the risk, or just to analyse if your initial assumption was correct, even for a short time. I'm not saying to ignore your gut either, but I am saying give it a pause at least a little bit. People that say their 'gut is never wrong' are the same types like conspiracy theorists who always think they're r…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 01:30 PM
2

So much THIS, and while the gut feeling may sometimes come first, it's not only smart to analyse why you feel that way to also know yourself better, but a necessity: if we judge people purely on UNEXPLAINABLE gut feelings, then we're judging people on purely 100% monkey brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 12:30 AM
1

I entirely agree, but with one exception: I can imagine some people saying "hard to explain" because they can't be bothered explaining haha. Like with your car example, you're absolutetly right that it becomes instinctual, but that the driver can still analyse in depth, every facet of driving, from turning on the ignition, to complex ducking and weaving. Though, that would already take a long time to explain. Now imagine how much longer it would be to explain that to someone who has never driven…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 12:27 AM
1

Still not a personal attack! God you go on...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 09:42 AM
1

Not red pill, but not purely 50/50 (purple pill, hence the group name). Basically I think red pill is way too off the pale, but I don't agree with a lot of (vocal) modern feminism, and technically 'more pro man' based partly on me being a man myself. Both things not considered 'blie pill' for either gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 01:04 PM
1

Tbh, for both sides even, PPD should be considered a gymnasium 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 11:27 AM
1

Lol, your last point just showed your dumb misogyny... It's a stupid question, that's all there is to it, but at least we didn't treat it gospel like you women did with the man and bear thing. To me, it just seemed like an arbitrary 'you have to pick one.' Personally I'd still pick gay son in that case, and I'd like a duaghter in future. It depends how one defines a 'thot' for example, but assuming the extreme, this isn't as simple as just a promiscuous woman, but essentially being Mia Khalifa. …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 11:25 AM
8

They have much more access to firearms Based on what? The gun amendment (Idk which number that is, I'm not American) does not discriminate on gender. Not sure how simply owning a gun otherwise means much of anything are far less likely to use mental health resources, we self medicate using drugs and booze more often, and socially isolate more and spend less them on developing and maintaining social networks. Because society teaches us since we were kids, not to show our emotions so much. Tbh, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 09:05 AM
10

100% man, also similar to what I wrote on my own thread here. It's one thing if society focuses so much on women's issues, though made toxic when it usually has to shit on men a surprising amount of times to do so (nice empowerment you've got there ladies, having to shit on others to feel powerful. Literal bully mentality), it's horrible though when the few times we hear about men's issues like the loneliness epidemic that it's taken more as a schadenfreude 'sucked in!' By bitter women, or simpl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 08:59 AM
2

Ngl, but it's pointless to debate what shows up more these days, probably because algorithms are so robust and effective now, we really are seeing a filtered view of things. Like I genuinely entirely disagree with what you're saying, and feel there's far too much spotlighting on women's issues, not just online, but in society, and almost always using the general population of men as scapegoats with that: rape and consent ads always painting the picture that it's apparently most men who are a thr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 08:48 AM
–

Disagree, at least from my anecdotals as me as a man, and my male friends. I'd possibly agree, at least in the short term that ONS are more adventerous, probably because of the sometimes relstive anonymity of it all, and the passion in the moment sort of thing, but the reason why LTRs report better sexual satisfaction: the partners know eachother more, and have had more experience together sexually, thus more likely to know eachother's wants, kinks, and sensitivities. the added factor of love, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 10:45 PM
1

I'm upset? You're the one making a hilarious hateful rant on all males 😂 Ok woman, stop talking, and get back to cooking my food 😉 P.S hilarious that your flair is 'pills create division' yet you couldn't be more divisive 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 10:18 PM
11

Why is it that everytime people look at divorce stats they: 1) always assume the woman left the relationship because the man is apparently always abusive 2) that somehow the woman has little to no responsibilty for the relationship going bad? It honestly just seems like a cope from the current generation on the current high divorce rates, and projecting past relationships where women had to get married, onto a completley different context today.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:36 PM
2

It's not even that, plenty of lesbians and bi women find it hard just to enter a relationship with a woman, so it's not even entirely true what you're saying there either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:33 PM
3

Even as a 'magenta pill' I couldn't believe this at first sight, but it's shown on so many impartial survey and statistical sources, it's hilarious how true this is 😂. Though what is sad, is that I think lesbian DV rates are also surprisingly high. If this doesn't make it obvious enough either, if you know enough bi/lesbian women, they constantly whine to you about how much they have to lead the relationship, attract women, understand them etc. And I'm like "you're just getting this now? Join th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 12:31 PM
1

Very well written and detailed!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 11:20 AM
1

That is her playing. You just didn't like the moves and the speed with which the game ended. She's playing by not playing? And you say you can't take me seriously... There are literally no moves of you flip a table or dont play the chess game. Sure, some do, typically when that man has lied and concealed his true self too well or proves he cannot be relied upon. And this is typically after a woman has been absorbing and supporting his behavior for ages. I rest my case... Right here you essential…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 06:54 AM
1

Yes but in a game of chess, both are players. Often times the men have to make the risk to make the first move, but then just have the other player (woman) decline, or even flip the table perse. Women are also emotional rocks for men elsewise I do not think they'd be so miffed not to have one or when theirs is away. Some of the few times men unload their emotions on women, they get the 'ick' hence you correctly stating that there are plenty of women complaining about this online. But the amount …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:47 AM
1

Tough shit if you're not interested. You can blame me for all the wrongs of the past that men did back then, it'll have 0 ground because I had nothing to do with it. Y’all are pretty horrible humans so yeah, deal with the consequences of your actions. Hahahaha and THERE it is! Always in there somewhere... You could've saved us a lot of time by you simply stating you're a disgusting, misandrist, hateful pig, instead of you beating around the bush previously 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 12:50 AM
1

Like, one example is that child bearing and child rearing will always put women at a disadvantage because it's not seen as labor, therefore women won't get compensated for it. Similarly, women are naturally seen as the better caregivers unfairly, so they tend to be given the default favourable ruling in custody cases. I never disagreed that women aren't still disadvantaged now in certain areas, but you conveniently miss examples where women benefit here as welm by so called 'patrisrchy' or other…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 09:02 PM
1

It's precisely that with the bear, you know what's coming. Also, to be fair, Grizzly Bears actually won't attack you unless you threaten them/try to take their food/mess with their cubs. They usually attack out of defense. They are WILD ANIMALS, and therefore unpredictable... Just because they may TEND to attack you for those reasons, doesnt mean they wont otherwise. Bears cant be reasoned with either, men can. I love how once again women here act like they're bear whisperers every time... I mea…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 09:02 PM
1

Once again, what happened in the past is irrelevant, as per my point... And there are plenty of times to the contrary where men have been locked in prison for rape with such little evidence, to be found either innocent, or not the correct perpetrator after being in prison for years. You also forget that even in cases where men have been proven INNOCENT in rape cases, they're absolutely shamed, shunned, and bullied by everyone, by men and women. As few as they are, many of the women who falsely a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 08:14 PM
1

But it is, on average, a male experience to make the first move, be an emotional rock for our partners, lead the relationship etc. And the bear and man hypothetical is strictly about men. So not sure how you get to the conclusion that these aren't mainly masculine issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 08:06 PM
3

No, because that's not how that works... You don't assume someone might be right or wrong, based on social grievances in which, btw, an age likely just about no redditor was even born in. That's not how justice works. I always think, thank god the law courts aren't run by the 'believe all women' types, because that wouldn't be impartial justice...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:59 AM
1

" women went "Fine by us!"." The amount of articles coming out unironically by 30s+ feminists who once thought exactly that way, and now feel lonely themselves (I wouldn't be surprised if there's going to be a female loneliness epidemic, just might be slightly lagged atm) makes me think that kind of thinking has massively backfired for them...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:36 AM
0

inb4 she says something like 'become a feminist' lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:35 AM
1

Yes and no, there are absolutely these types of toxic women, and even as an outgoing guy who has dated around quite a bit, they're there. Sometimes as clear as daylight. I'd agree some bitter types think these women are literally everywhere, but that just sounds like the male equivelant to bitter women unironically thinking all men are closeted murder rapists, hence they'd unironically cuddle up to a grizzly bear. I don't think it's fair for people to say women have it on easy mode on everything…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:32 AM
1

hey, it could be worse, could br r/mgtow or r/Feminism haha, at least this page encourages people from all gender identities, and all parts of the gender political spectrum. It has its moments, but a pluralistic dumpster fire is always better than an echo chambered dumbster fire: at least the former forces you to think critically, and perhaps learn something new
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:23 AM
1

his point wasn't necessarily ignoring the positives women do, but essentially saying the men's efforts go largely ignored. You kind of made him rest his case...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:20 AM
1

"Actually, it starts outside of dating. MenAreTrash, KillAllMen, I choose bear. Women radiate hostility against men like it's Strontium-90 and then gaslight them with bullshit like if they're not "those men" then they shouldn't be offended lest they be accused of self-pitying or dismissive of women's pain. But if you genderflip those memes to reflect men's pain at the hands of women, women lose their everloving minds." So much, this, especially with all the dogpiling going on on that recent resu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 07:17 AM
1

well, that's not me
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 10:28 PM
2

oh right, so now you're some sort of hero, and all these men are literally 'evil.' Is it any wonder no one listens to types like you, including your ridiculous hypotheticals...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 11:35 AM
2

"Well men’s bodies over 25 are pretty gross." This may as well be as stupidly unrealistic and insulting as basically saying women are nothing but flabs after age 30...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 09:54 AM
3

it is difficult for these women blinded by dissonance and their precious bear answer lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 09:49 AM
1

hahaha, yes once again proving my point. This groups purpose is literally to foster all sides of the 'gender political spectrum,' male, female, or non binary. But sure, even feminist men are apparently misogynist then according to you! Of course I understand why you chose the bear, doesn't automatically assume it's a logical choice though. If you're so dismissive, and don't like replies you disagree with, or men debating gender politics in general, then why are you in a group like this then? Tal…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 09:47 AM
1

and it's a good thing no one cares for your reply! It's a public forum numbnuts, I don't need to be asked to reply ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 09:44 AM
1

"And of course you can’t understand the question nor have a patience." I've given you patience for like a few comments now, and given you several paragraphs where you keep just childishly going "BuT iS tHaT a PrObLeM?" "Well my point is that you so offended that women view this problem seriously that you want to control the narrative and dictate how serious it “actually is” and how women should feel and teach them about tone." So you accuse me of not understanding the point, when you've entirely…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:22 AM
1

I literally answered your question in detail, and you just keep on going "does that matter? Does that matter?" You don't have much of a point otherwise, other than assuming there's an apparent 'x vast proportionate amount of rapes' going on, and when someone like me says you're generalising a bit, you go 'how much will make it a problem then?' Like some irrelevant red herring. What's the point from here on discussing subjectives on what unspecificed large or smaller amount of this is going on? W…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:49 AM
1

a big one actually, if you actually want people to listen to you, not sound batshit insulting and insane, and also actually be fucking realistic. The last of which is also useful when you actually implement policy and strategies, not like a bunch of dumb TikTok women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:19 AM
2

no one is saying it's not an issue, like no one ever... That's not the same thing as pretending it's literally everywhere still, learn how proportionality works. This whole thing would've been better off, if like all the gender war shit, it wasn't made to be so damn reductive, and full of bitter women on tiktok complaining about men for the 1000th time, instead of just neutrally just making their point heard through their own experience. That's how persuasion, and getting people to listen works,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 12:22 AM
1

https://www.facebook.com/unodc/photos/globally-81-of-victims-of-homicide-are-male-and-90-of-suspects-in-homicide-cases/10156073218032331/?locale=ms_MY&_rdr (From the UNDOC official facebook page) let's also not forget that statistically 81% of homocide victims are men. Yes sure, also statistically likely from other men, but that statistic would be the same in this woods argument. So if anything, a woman is less likely to be killed in a forest by another man, than a man would seeing another man. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 11:28 PM
1

haha that's so fucking broad. I don't know where you get that stat for starters, but I won't deny most crime in general is committed by men. That doesn't mean they're all in equal amounts, if anything statistically there'd be a lot more male crime in terms of thievery, fraud, vandalism, arson, drug trafficking etc. But sure, let's all pretend they're all just as likely to occur, including with violent rape and murder, because you say so!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 11:22 PM
1

"Boo hoo, men are villified, not fair. Women are scared. Women are killed because they say no. Women are raped and tortured just because. Women are attacked because they are weaker. They are stalked. etc." We've heard this so often too, yet you're acting like this happens every day on every corner. It doesn't, so you don't call this just as stupidly hyperbolic?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 11:17 PM
1

lol, despite the women who introduced this debate were all bad faith about it, acted like we should take such a stupid question seriously, and 'yes, all men' but we're the ones with silly reactions? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 11:13 PM
1

this is said so tiresomely often. How statistically often is it that men go full out slasher movie psychopathy? So no, it really isn't as unpredictable as you think
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 11:04 PM
1

To be honest, not the best argument, because you're going into literal details on liklieness of finding a man in the woods vs a bear. It's more about if the woman had no choice but to be in the woods alone with a man or a bear, thus the question assumes they're both just as likely as eachother to occur, and will occur when the woman chooses. So I think your best point is your third point. This was my main point as well, most men will act neutral statistically, whilst a bear as you correctly say …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:59 PM
1

"Your not going to change the mind of millions of women who’ve been traumatised by men" and you think we're going to change our minds, because a bunch of these generalising women took to tiktok to pretty much say 'yes all men' if not, then why did you bother bashing us over the head with it all over social media then? So clearly you were trying to influence something debate wise...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:52 PM
1

As I've said to many people that make this standpoint, no one would justify someone saying they'd 'rather choose a bear over a black man' simply because they had a bad experience with black people, and *something something, black crime stats* (not my words, theirs) and people wouldn't justify that person's point of view because it is inherently racist. Therefore, whether they had this bad experience or not, how does this not make it a generalised sexist statement? It does, but it's simply becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 10:50 PM
3

Yeah can agree. I think for both genders, self improvement advice in general isn't a bad thing, as it's the aspect of attractiveness you can control (as opposed to other people's behaviour around you) but the problem is, if the issue isn't that, or you're just plain unlucky, being told 'try and self improve' when said critics could arguably even see you have improved, helps no one. The 'you go girl' attitude also permeats a lot in this annoying age of 'girl boss' media, and the Mary Sue populari…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/25 02:54 AM
5

Yeah, couldn't agree more. I don't think it helps though that some emotionally immature women do specifically claim they want to be 'chased' persistently though, as stupid as that is. I mainly heard this shit in uni days, thank god I rarely hear it at my age now. Even if she does want me to chase her, I'm no child in the playground, I legit don't get why men waste their time just to either get breadcrumbed, or simply following someone who like you said, doesn't even want their company.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 01:14 AM
5

lmao, that's hilarious, especially when by definition it's the women who are the gatekeeprs of fertility... Also the 2B feminist movement itself calls on abstinence which naturally also means no childbirth either...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 11:53 PM
3

Haha, I never thought of it that way! They're all about 'NuAnCe' and endless intersectionality, if it's within their own group, or minorities they gatekeep. But for 'majority' groups, let alone 'big bad' strsight white men, and all of a sudden subtlety goes out the window. They're all an insidious, unthinking, hive minded, monoliths, like the borg in Star Trek. Though even the former they sometimes betray. They're all about intersectionality with feminism, but there is kind of a schism within th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 06:02 AM
3

Of course it needed research to legitimise the point, but I feel like telling the people who didn't know these obvious results by going "ya think???" Haha, but it just goes to show how biased society is in terms of gender issues
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:51 AM
9

And yet if we even hear ONE case of some dick head man posting revenge porn of his ex, society as per usual explodes into moral panic with the usual "now you see how hard it is to be a woman!!!" But in this case, it was arguably mainly smaller media groups, and probably more youtube sources that bothered writing about this only, and it wasn't the unethical nature of the website that ultimately took it down, it was the information leak, despite the sheer tonne of women using the app... Let that s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 04:27 AM
2

Well yeah, but thpse overrepresented stats also likely include rape, so now that I think about it as you pointed out, I specifically highlighted the overrepresentation of rape in the black community, which itself is more often than not done by men. Thus, I forced those feminists more or less to put their money where their mouth is, where they're happy to blame all men, but if they're found to technically also be disproportionately blaming black men more, they all of a sudden shut up on their gen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 01:00 PM
2

reminds me of a post on one of the feminist subreddits where they essentially tried to justify that 'enough men' were rapists, to essentially deem all men as rapists/potential rapists, through the use of the usual overly warped statistics, exaggerating beyond breaking point, gaslighting you if you disagree etc. To that I told them (without the nuance, as they weren't giving any) "wouldn't that be like saying you're scared of all black people, and assume they're all likely thugs/thieves/murderers…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/25 05:41 AM
1

Yep, everything is our fault, but all of a sudden when they need societal change for themselves, they need us allies...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/25 12:51 PM
1

it's an auto generated name you idiot... also not everything with the word 'map' means 'Minorly Attracted Persons' dumb ass "oh I don't know where to go for our road trip, quick, grab the Minorly Attracted Person so we can know where to go!"...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/25 05:19 AM
1

1) everyone suffers in a war though 2) speak for yourself
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 06:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter