CNN Telegram rape/motherless (website) sleep category investigation

CZ-7000 · 2026-04-16T10:46:25+00:00

You’re making a mistake here with the numbers.

Motherless got 62 million views in one month, with no known gender breakdown. We know from websites like Pornhub that women make up around 35–40% of users on large porn sites and tend to watch proportionally rougher content. So there is a good chance that a significant portion of those 62 million views comes from women.

When it comes to the “sleeping porn” category, the report mentions 20,000 videos uploaded but only gives a total view count of “hundreds of thousands of views,” which means an average viewcount of 5-50 Views per Video, which is basically nothing. And again, there is no gender breakdown of the viewers.

If you look at the Big Kink Survey by Aella, which tracks kinks among men and women, the following numbers of people reported having a sleeping kink:
Men: 13,578
Women: 13,664

Now to the most serious part: in all of these inflated numbers, they found one Telegram group with nearly a thousand users who talked about drugging their partners and raping them (and fuck these pieces of shit).

So we went from 62 million men, to 62 million men and women, to hundreds of thousands of men, to hundreds of thousands of men and women, and finally arrived at the actual problematic number of under 1,000 men WORLDWIDE.

People’s brains are fried.

Just for context, in the NISVS 2012 report, they found about 1.9 million men being raped by a woman in the past 12 months in the USA alone.

griii2 · 2026-04-16T07:46:26+00:00

Watching 'Sleeping porn' makes a rapist like watching WWE makes me a violent sadist.

Centaur_Warchief123 · 2026-04-16T08:16:12+00:00

Its the usual men bashing bullshit. If watching “sleeping” category porn is problematic for men, why is no one talking about women being the main consumers for “rape” content both video and writing? Just check the shit women read and its just always rich, always tall werewolf/vampire ceo raping some 18 year old and they call it “dark romance”, does that mean all women are rapist pedos or something?

Blaming entire gender, literally %50 of human population, for actions of %0,000001 is fucking stupid and its definitely sign of low iq or something. 10k dudes doing shady shit on telegram, what about so many women posting bestiality shit online? I remember the time when an American woman was arrested because she was filming having sex with her dog outside of a church in her car, the article talked about how there were thousands of women online that uploaded their videos/photos of doing it with various animals, should we bash all women because of this?

rump_truck · 2026-04-16T15:28:40+00:00

The numbers are important because they dictate the scale of the solution.

The 1000 men in the Telegram group can be tracked down and prosecuted for their crimes. The Nuremburg military tribunals found approximately 1400 men guilty. It's a big logistical undertaking, but as a species we've done it before, and we can do it again. If prosecutors fail to follow up on it, we can punish them politically. Justice is possible.

If it were 62 million men like people keep claiming, there's no possibility of justice. Google estimates that the world's total prison population is 12 million. That capacity would have to increase to 74 million, a 6x increase, that's simply not feasible.

I've seen a lot of people who genuinely believe that it was 62 million men, and who are saying that these men deserve to be killed. To put that in perspective, adding up both civilian and military casualties across all countries, Google estimates that WWII had 60-80 million casualties. Given that the nature of the crime specifically selects for men who have relationships with other people, millions of innocents could get hurt. If these people had their way, it would likely be the bloodiest armed conflict in human history.

We can, and should, demand Nuremburg 2.0 over this (plus the Epstein files). We can, and should, demand that Motherless and Telegram be shut down over this. Demanding WWIII over this is insanity.

CthulhusIntern · 2026-04-17T13:16:09+00:00

I can't say for sure if the intention of the article is to manufacture consent for online ID laws or to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act... but if I were trying to manufacture consent for online ID laws or to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and I wrote this article, I'd think I did a pretty damn good job.

ChimpPimp20 · 2026-04-16T20:07:01+00:00

However, like any fantasy, it is possible to watch faked simulations of this.

As a kid between 12-15, I saw a lot of this. The weird thing was that I got off on the videos where it was the female porn stars doing the offending. When it was the male porn stars simulating it, I didn't like it as much. I think even as a kid I knew something was off about it. Like by design you know not to interrupt a person's sleep anyway. I guess it was my premature benevolent sexism/internalized misandry. As a result, I don't know too many male porn stars who participated in this form of pornographic "acting." However, I do know some female ones. Some names include:

-Faye Raegan, Dani Jensen, Rachel James, Helena Price, etc.

I wanna say that a lot of the stuff you'll find are probably fake scenarios where the woman is a stepmom which further adds to the whole dynamic. That's a category in itself. There's a whole slew of nefarious fake scenarios in porn it's actually kind of ridiculous. It actually kind of gives credence to the sex negative/anti-porn crowd. There's coercion; incest, teacher/student sex, sleeping subjects, you name it. Another one that I'm just now remembering is "Black Patrol" where female cops force detainees to have sex if they want freedom. The detainees are exactly the demographic you are thinking of.

Of course this doesn't stop at women. There are male actors involved in these problematic categories too. The "XXXPawn" site states this: "Welcome to XXX Pawn! All of the girls in my videos are not actors. They are real ladies that I fucked while working at my pawn shop." Obviously these women are indeed actors but that's easy to see through. There's also site that showcases some store manager forcing a thief (either male or female) to have sex or risk prosecution. I don't remember what it's called (mainly because I'm too lazy to look it up) but there's plenty of porn stars on that site too.

I do think that porn needs to either refrain from depicting these acts or put a message in the beginning explaining that the acts shown are unethical as well as make believe.

Used-Huckleberry5363 · 2026-04-20T16:56:36+00:00

An inflated Fearmongering campaign is what the article has generated. Whoever first ran the 62million social media campaign is the problem

king_rootin_tootin · 2026-04-16T19:47:05+00:00

I would love CNN to do a story on the explosion of the "romantasy" written porn that is for women, by women and about women.

The "Milking farm," about a millennial chick fucking a minotaur, was literally a best seller.

MarkThorburn17 · 2026-04-17T22:22:05+00:00

It's CNN what did we expect

UnarmedRespite · 2026-04-17T08:43:47+00:00

I’m curious where people are getting these estimates of how large the chat groups are. I can’t find numbers in the article

EDIT: it was from a followup article https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1smvcfp

Open-Rich3191 · 2026-05-05T03:30:15+00:00

Let’s be honest about what this is it’s pornography. Much of it is staged, exaggerated, and detached from reality. That doesn’t excuse what’s been uncovered; content that appears to encourage drugging partners or facilitating harm is deeply disturbing and absolutely deserves scrutiny. That’s where the focus should be.

But shifting the spotlight onto ordinary individuals people who have merely viewed or searched for this material crosses into dangerous territory. There’s a fundamental difference between investigating potential criminal behavior and broadly condemning consumers of legal content. Blurring that line risks turning concern into overreach.

Demonizing people for viewing explicit material, however uncomfortable or controversial it may be, sets a troubling precedent. It redirects accountability away from those potentially engaging in or promoting harmful actions and instead places it on a much broader, less culpable group.

This is exactly why someone needs to step up and write a article examining how outlets like CNN have handled this story. The focus should be on whether the coverage is holding the right parties accountable or unfairly casting suspicion on viewers rather than addressing the source of the problem. Media narratives shape public perception, and when they miss the mark, the consequences ripple outward.

What’s equally concerning is the reaction this narrative is fueling online. It’s amplifying distrust, deepening gender divides, and encouraging sweeping generalizations particularly toward men based on viewing habits alone. That kind of discourse doesn’t lead to solutions, it escalates division.

More importantly, this moment raises serious questions about where this leads. If the line continues to shift, what happens when private searches and viewing habits become grounds for public judgment or surveillance? The implications for privacy, personal freedom, and digital rights are significant. Today it’s one category of content tomorrow it could be anything deemed “offensive” or “harmful.”

There’s a real issue here, but addressing it requires precision, not panic. Accountability should remain focused on actual wrongdoing not expanded into a broad indictment of personal behavior that, while controversial, is not inherently criminal.

AutoModerator · 2026-04-16T06:19:59+00:00

Thank you for posting to r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates. All new posts are held for manual review and may take up to 48 hours to be approved. Please don’t message the moderators, we’ll make sure to review your submission as soon as possible. If this is your first post, be sure to review our rules to ensure it meets our criteria.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

RepositoryOfSluts · 2026-05-08T18:49:57+00:00

It’s down and out now. Which is funny, because there’s an entire pornography studio called shoplifter that depicts non consensual sex acts (simulated of course because it’s porn) but that doesn’t cause virtue signalers any concern. It’s just a pay to play rigged system. They all say they want to protect women but they close the avenues that allow women to work independently and force them under the boot of men ran studios. Pornography is a symptom of systemic issues and not the cause. This won’t save anyone.

THE_Hyperscaler · 2026-05-09T00:04:34+00:00

Is the prison population relevant?

Hot_Top9180 · 2026-05-13T23:14:30+00:00

Try being a woman 😂. 10,000 😂 the statistic is that one in three women have been sexually assaulted at least once, and those are the reports, but being a woman we all know it’s at least all that, probably almost 100%. We all know all the reasons why we don’t report it. I’ve come from a solid family in a middle class neighborhood, and I went to Catholic school and I was sexually assaulted at least five times in my life, including when I was 55 years old, wearing baggy, sweatpants and looking like hell. At least twice it happened in front of plenty of other guys and nobody said anything. I don’t understand why the good men are so blind to it. It seems absolutely insane to me.

chufuxhduudf · 2026-04-21T05:21:29+00:00

Should I be worried I’m pretty sure I went on that website a couple times to watch normal porn vids now i’m kinda scared some hacker is gonna leak the ips of everyone who visited the site

cudambercam13 · 2026-04-17T23:43:42+00:00

My uncle is into the Telegram platform. He's a MAGA republican, racist, homophobic, flat-earther.

I don't know shit about the platform except that it caters to assholes like that. How do accounts work there? Is it like Facebook where you use your real name and info, or like Reddit where you use a username and can remain anonymous? If he's into this shit, I want my family to know.

Free-Resident-4202 · 2026-04-27T02:10:07+00:00

<image>

Unmask the enablers: Follow the money behind the Motherless ‘rape academy’
https://thedemlabs.org/2026/04/26/follow-money-motherless-rape-university-cnn-investigation/

gryan16 · 2026-04-19T05:46:58+00:00

Regardless of who is feeding into the sleep category, it’s still normalizing and fantasizing scenes that appear as non-consensual s x.

Laukian0308 · 2026-04-21T15:46:10+00:00

CUANTO HOMBRE TOCANDOSE EL PITITO. DAN ASCO, AGUANTEN LAS LESBINAS MANGA DE JUSTIFICADORES SERIALES

Fun-Preparation-4253 · 2026-04-16T17:01:08+00:00

To put this in perspective: Motherless received 62 million hits in February. Dominos received 61.45 million this in March. Motherless was a porn website who actively harbored horrible content. Dominos sells pizza. Regardless of nuance of context, it's horrifying.

EDIT: omg... I've completely misunderstood this sub. It came through my algorithm. Saw the name. Saw the post. And made an assumption.

gabrielleduvent · 2026-04-19T13:52:02+00:00

Aaaaand men's attitude in discussions like this is why women will never, ever, trust men as a whole.

Thank you for proving the point.

WestExplanation6064 · 2026-04-17T18:29:29+00:00

Wow, this site sucks. There was a story in France about a woman who was raped by her husband and his buddies, after she was drugged... for years.

We should be disgusted 6 million or 60... it should be zero

PeggyJoo · 2026-04-17T17:16:48+00:00

People have been drugged and raped without consent, its not about numbers or being annoyed by men be labled 'bad' its for sympathy to those who have experienced this and how we can change these cultures and 'statistics'. Not all men are monsters by any stretch of the imagination, but this is not about you its about the victims. Try centering that, men are not the victim in this story, women are. Therefore woman are angry.

Title	CNN Telegram rape/motherless (website) sleep category investigation
Author	Salty-Map-942
Upvotes	122
Comments	222
Date	April 16, 2026 6:19 AM UTC (3 months ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1smvcfp/cnn_telegram_rapemotherless_website_sleep/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/cnn-telegram-rapemotherless-website-sleep-category.1578073 https://theredarchive.com/post/1578073

Comments