TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Scarce12 Archive

View 5 posts and 2,436 comments by Scarce12 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,436 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
34

This is really the tip of the iceberg, on most days, if you open https://abc.net.au, it features mostly pictures of women, particularly in health and lifestyle sections. If the news is good, female politicians are favoured against men, if the news is bad a picture of a man is shown.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:05 AM
23

How do feminists explain this online behaviour?
/r/MensRights11/06/24 09:42 PM
22

Feminists write this and wonder why women are having such a hard time: http://theage.com.au/lifestyle/life-and-relationships/australians-average-13-3-sexual-partners-in-a-lifetime-that-doesn-t-seem-like-many-to-me-20240521-p5jfg9.html
/r/MensRights11/06/24 11:48 AM
132

Let the defamation proceedings commence.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 04:52 AM
105

tell me to not view women as sex objects This is quite the Freudian slip by them, have you asked them how they established that dating involves treating other people as objects? The revelation here is modern women's Madonna-Whore complex, and it's impact on men.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 02:53 AM
13

There are some truly horrible people out there.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 07:18 PM
1

It's really a freedom of speech issue, some things are valid, somethings probably aren't, somethings you can agree with, somethings you probably can't. The asymmetry regarding freedom of speech about this in comparison to feminism is startling. Toxic Feminist views regularly feature in newspaper editorials. Yet they seek government funding to silence criticism and counter-arguments through a "male supremacy index", and this is a huge threat to freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 07:07 PM
4

The problem is western women are genuinely becoming less healthy and thus less attractive.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 11:28 PM
1

The reason why people started using the word "female" was because they were told to the word "women" was insulting and to use the word "womyn", which also can be considered insulting. Just utter confusion.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:42 AM
26

That indeed did happen in Australia (Martinez v R [2023] NSWDC 552): https:/hearsay.org.au/prosecutors-discretion-to-continue-prosecution-salient The judge scorned the prosecution for not checking her history of rape allegations and indeed the defending argument provided, even on Reddit even within the law forums on reddit, was that the prosecution had managed to secure pleas by previous men. Men who, like the defendant, were in threat of incarceration and ridicule of public trial if they did no…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 02:59 PM
9

Notice how they focus in on wage averages and completely ignore unemployment: http://aifs.gov.au/research/facts-and-figures/employment-men-and-women-across-life-course The above shows that while 4% of women are unemployed in the ages bracket of 20-24, whereas 6% of men are unemployed in this age bracket.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:21 PM
10

When they admitted that their department employs less men "and they are working on it", that was an absolute burn! He really should of asked them to elaborate on that. Notice the crossed arms and talking over him in the mike near the end. Passive aggressive behaviour.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 08:06 AM
5

As we can see, the police will lie and cheat to get more funding. Do not talk to the police, only provide identification. Get a lawyer and fight them. They are desperate to charge men to support this narrative.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:48 PM
12

This is government funded media, and complaints can be made here: https://help.abc.net.au/hc/en-us/articles/360001153176-I-wish-to-lodge-a-complaint-about-something-I-saw-heard-or-read-on-ABC-What-can-I-do
/r/MensRights05/06/24 12:01 PM
10

DV against women is a more serious problem, but only because men are way more capable of doing damage. We saw in Sydney, Australia, a woman stab a man to death in a DV incident. Why is DV a gender issue in Australia. It is not.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 02:08 AM
20

The 2nd wave feminists were pushing the narrative that marriage is patriarchal oppression. Interestingly, many of them commenced cohabitating later in life, well after the 1970s. However, the push for marriage rights by the gay and lesbian community has destroyed this narrative. Indeed, many 2nd wave feminists lament this, like Germaine Greer, and have come out strongly as TERF's, causing themselves to become unpopular and forgotten.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 01:53 AM
7

The bots are mods, if you want to know which accounts to block.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 07:41 AM
1

Block them. That way they can't follow you around and harass like this.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 07:39 AM
215

This in Victoria, a state of Australia, under extraordinarily terrible mismanagement, running up huge debts. Where do we begin with this? I mean: In a statement shared on social media, Richardson said it shouldn't be left to women to take responsibility for men's violence. I just cant... And then this, even though Australia has record filicide by the hands of women: We know that the time to act on men’s violence against women is now and it starts with us men and boys." "We must make Victoria a s…
/r/MensRights02/06/24 12:26 AM
1

You've gotta be careful buddy, you argue with them and they put you on AWDTSG, just cut the date early and text them that you had a nice night.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 11:30 AM
16

From what I'm seeing, the Mods are doing everything they can to stop this push happening through Reddit, to close this sub down. In doing so, they've had to block people from posting, had to close and delete posts very quickly. To stop the haters from holding things up in effigy to the Reddit Admins and claim reddit is upholding misogyny. The only thing is, shutting this sub-reddit down would be big news, and Reddit knows such news would be circulated.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 06:16 AM
3

"did you have sex because a man gave you alcohol/drugs". Wow. There are young women who legit do actually have sex with guys to get drugs. They drop hints during the first couple of dates and ghost you if you don't get the hint and get the drugs. I'm certain other guys will agree.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 02:52 AM
6

There's two separate things going on. There's white females demanding to be an elevated class, who promote a gender binary dialogue to advance this. Then there are issues among poorer disenfranchised communities (first nation people). Western Australia has more of the latter as compared to the east coast.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 01:41 AM
4

The evolution of Hindu Stridhana is always seemed peculiar to me, it is broad in scope and does appear to allow the woman to take the majority of assets. In is another example of Coverture still being maintained and promoted in legal systems, it's just that it's gender reversed Coverture, and I'm seeing this is a growing issue which will take generations to resolve.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 12:49 AM
8

Crimes against humanity.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 11:05 PM
1

It's the common law doctrine of Coverture. When a man marries a woman in the post modern era, his legal status is subsumed into the woman's, and all authority defers to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 06:36 PM
1

Confidence is rubbish in a relationship. It's a bike pump in a canoe. After having sex a good number of times, the confidence a ex-virgin gets from sex in the relationship is genuine. That's confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 12:17 PM
0

No they're missing out on authentic sex, where the girl is as nervous as him and it's all new to both of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 12:03 PM
-3

I'd hate to be a lesbian, all that dick envy causing me to insert myself into everything. Who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 08:59 AM
1

Depends what you are looking for. Pornstar style sex sure. But how many rock bands are still full of passion and raw energy on their 8th album?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 06:05 AM
1

Yes it is because, if you go with an experienced woman, you can get the wrong impression about sex and not experience the joy of it. There's no excitement or fun with an experienced woman, the sex is like a flat battery in terms of chemistry.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 04:56 AM
-3

You're going to find a lot of girls will be put off by nervous, tentative energy, especially if you feel you need a lot of patience, reassurance, and guidance going into it. They might be into you initially, but then switch up after detecting this energy about you. Is that a bad thing? Honestly, these women are also the worst at sex. It's sex is exciting and enjoyable with women with an n-count less than say 4. Then after that it's just all porno style sex where the woman is disconnected from th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 04:48 AM
6

The problem is defamation. Publishing allegations before any conviction or finding is made. It perverts the course of justice and legal action should be allowed to be taken against the publishers. Even if no conviction or finding is made, the accused is fired for bringing the company into disrepute. It needs to end.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 01:50 AM
17

A lot of government departments now only allow contact via the mother regarding the children. The father needs to get consent via the mother, who assumes all rights. What actually happens is they default to sole parent as the situation, with the woman being the default contact if there is a marriage. The process and form work to undo and establish a different structure is difficult. Centrelink in Australia does this, for example.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:41 AM
41

It would have to be a country where the government sets policy to not fund organisations based on "positive discrimination" based on binary gender attributes. Essentially, it would have to be a government that does not feed into this self-perpetuating funding structure based on this idea of men hating women requiring more funding to stop men hating women, requiring organisations to advance this idea that men hate women, to receive exclusive funding. We are a long way off from this, many generati…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 11:37 PM
31

They fire male professors for far less.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 09:09 PM
2

This stuff is going to age like milk Just warning them. But seriously, do you remember that time during the Biden Administration when they were labelling people as Male Supremacists? Yeah how stupid was that.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 04:00 AM
4

Living with a guy at 26 and then being married to a guy 30. Are they the same guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:49 AM
1

Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:20 AM
5

There is no such thing as Patriarchy in the words they define it as. The closest thing is probably the old laws of Coverture, which are well and truly abolished and were done to simplify administration under the crown by making men responsible (to the point of hanging) for the household.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 02:10 AM
2

It's a bit different though because the Patriarchy theory's primary assertion is that men hate women - women don't hate men, men don't hate men, but men hate women. Everything else is decomposed from this point of origin. It's not a Marxist thing because that was more about oppression, not hate.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 01:58 AM
2

You literally spelt out the definition of it. That is exactly what it is about. It's the hypothesis that men are naturally misogynistic, and application of this hypothesis to deconstruct everything else in society. For example. Problem: lesbian and bisexual women report more domestic violence than heterosexual women or men, and in particular, gay men. Deconstruction: applying the rule of patriarchy, men hate women. Therefore the domestic violence lesbians and bisexuals report is from men from pr…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 01:40 AM
3

Document what's going on. Stop covering for them. Send the extra work to the manager to look after it.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 01:03 AM
0

Here's where society gets stuck on this, the message is: Only men can be bad role models in society - men exploit men! And then we are told we have bad bullshit detectors. And this then goes nowhere, except it does retain the narrative of women's victimhood, because it's hard to peel this back and get to the first question: Why are you making this a gender issue? The same question we ask again and again and again.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:54 PM
10

They have to be, under reddit policy, as I understand it. Otherwise we will need to distribute info and ban bot accounts.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 12:12 PM
47

Block all the moderators. You can get the list of Moderators via selecting "About", or via scrolling to the bottom right corner. https://np.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/ Click on each moderator and select "block account". With all the moderators blocked, they can't scan your account to see if you posted here.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 11:24 AM
2

That's cold.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 06:04 AM
2

They redefined what constitutes sex though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:06 AM
0

We curiously haven't had any surveys showing the distribution of sexual activity and n-counts in a very long time now. All we get are averages and medians. But the last survey showed the top 5% of men were getting even more sex from women, and the median was not following this for men, with women this didn't happen: The National Survey of Family Growth data shows that in 2002 the most sexually active top 20% of American heterosexual men had 12 lifetime sex partners while the top 5% had 38 partne…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:01 AM
-2

Stops the draft blowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:55 AM
-14

Because it stops you going through my stuff, looking at my phone...etc
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:54 AM
2

What you really want is a silent partner. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/silentpartner.asp
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 11:24 PM
-20

"Pick those socks of the floor of my house that you pay money for!".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 11:19 PM
-1

Why do men have to conform? Because they get posted on "Are we dating the same guy?" And how do men conform? They approach, show status and game - they act dominant and women's responsive desire causes them to get the tingles? This is conformity?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 08:19 PM
4

Bullshit. If women are the product, why did they not use Bumble properly? Men are the product, that's why you expect them to approach you, entertain you, give you the option to try before buy. If you're are tired of that shit, it's because you tried all that product and moving on.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:24 PM
4

We know. Alpha seed / beta need. Break up, use OLD for hookups until you start feeling lonely, find a beta, get sexuaĺly bored. Break up, use OLD for hookups...etc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:17 PM
11

That article is comedy: Skylar Lee Blackman is taking a break from hookups, to heal from sexual truama. "I hope to stop having rando sex for a whole year!", says Skylar, "Do something that's completely feminine - something different to the male experience". And she's not alone. After years of having a high variety of sexual experiences with multiple male partners, many women are choosing to focus on themselves. Noir, a bisexual says it has given her a third eye, "I was at the grocery store and r…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:08 PM
–

The National Survey of Family Growth data shows that in 2002 the most sexually active top 20% of American heterosexual men had 12 lifetime sex partners while the top 5% had 38 partners.3 Ten years later, in 2012, the most sexually active top 20% now reported 15 lifetime sex partners and the top 5% of men reported 50 lifetime sex partners. There was no change in the median number of sex partners. The distribution of the number of sex partners among American heterosexual men was skewed already, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 12:57 PM
2

Note this: The distribution of the number of sex partners among American heterosexual men was skewed already, but in just 10 years, the distribution of sex partners among men became even more skewed. During the same time, there was no such change in the number of sex partners for heterosexual women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 12:53 PM
2

The answer is university doctors and psychologists are private practices which cost too much for zoomers. You honestly believe there's less drug use, given the amount of synthetics that have since been invented?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 12:43 PM
2

This is utter ivory tower bullshit. Never seen all the oxies, fentanyl, synthetics being used like they were back in the old days. Good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 12:40 PM
2

There was a paper showing data that since OLD, the alpha guys are slaying it more with the zoomers. The National Survey of Family Growth data shows that in 2002 the most sexually active top 20% of American heterosexual men had 12 lifetime sex partners while the top 5% had 38 partners.3 Ten years later, in 2012, the most sexually active top 20% now reported 15 lifetime sex partners and the top 5% of men reported 50 lifetime sex partners. There was no change in the median number of sex partners. h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 12:19 PM
1

I don't know if these statistics about them having less sex is accurate enough. They are having less sex per month sure, but they are marrying later.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 12:10 PM
2

CDC include dating as IPV, and people do date in a poly way: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is abuse or aggression that occurs in a romantic relationship. Intimate partner refers to both current and former spouses and dating partners. Some jurisdictions do this very differently and only include domestic relationships as DV, however this can include guests staying in boarding houses.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 07:18 AM
2

Here's your problem: 1) The first one was just using you for sex She's trying to improve on this, but finds some guys just give her this animalistic impulse. 2) The second one, thought that if she came out to meet you, she may have fallen deeply in love with you and this could break her heart and worsen her depression. So she just stayed inside and cried in bed. 3) The third one, she finds you such a mystery she doesn't know where to begin, you preoccupy her mind and even the counsellor she is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:45 AM
2

As you can see by this explanation, you are their NPC (Non-playing character).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:21 AM
2

One similarity to discuss is they both recommend spinning plates, which makes me think they often find each other in the dating market place and it creates a "Mr & Mrs Smith" situation. FDS sometimes discuss how to keep a guy on the side for sex whilst dating "HVMs" and pretending to be a prude, "because men have a Madonna-Whore complexes", which is wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:13 AM
2

We were discussing this, we we not?: We don’t have data for that 33%. It could be exclusively men or it could be any combination of victims with abusers of both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 06:07 AM
2

This is because women receive any interaction with a HVM as flirting and respond without thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 05:58 AM
2

Are we discussing something else now?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 05:52 AM
2

Obviously this can't be true: The only thing the data tells us is that third includes at least one male abuser for every reporter. If this is true: We don’t have data for that 33%. It could be exclusively men or it could be any combination of victims with abusers of both genders. We don't know their gender, except that they weren't identified to as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 02:34 AM
-1

I came to the same independent conclusion and this fundamentally undermines the credibility of this analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 01:57 AM
1

OP you write: It says that 67% of lesbians reporting IPV also report a female perpetrator. 67% of 43 is 30 so you can see that 30% of lesbians report being abused by women. As the rate for heterosexual women with male perpetrators is 35% you can see that lesbian relationships have lower rates of domestic violence than heterosexual ones. The report writes: Two-thirds of lesbian women (67.4%) reported having only female perpetrators of intimate partner violence. The lesbians abused by men AND wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 11:26 PM
1

Wow. You are certainly something. Getting a bit stroppy at me. My explanation is the best explanation of the data. Can you explain to me how we are discussing the Duluth model?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 09:36 PM
2

It's simple. The social definition of domestic violence now is something that men do to women as part of their misogyny. And that's the experience men receive even if they do report a domestic violence incident.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 09:27 PM
1

That's not an answer! And you know it. Firsyly, that report, which is almost 15 years old, doesn't address what I'm discussing, it doesn't even mention Duluth. Secondly you haven't even accepted my argument. Even Wikipedia addresses the criticisms of the Duluth model.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 09:14 PM
1

Well, Esther Perel says: At the heart of affairs, you find duplicity and cheating and betrayal, but you also find longing and loss for the life that one had, for the parts of oneself that have been denied. And so what happens in regards to sexual incompatibility and n-counts, is that you grow up being told sex and love go together, to find a soul mate, to find monogamy, but then you meet someone, you commit, and you start having sex and after a long time you realize, you were looking forward to …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 02:38 PM
1

The healing process is the same. Ether Perels book on infidelity is also recommended for deadbedrooms and retroactive jealousy it causes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 08:33 AM
1

The discussion was about lying, false promises and the damage it does to the relationship and healing process. They are right, it is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 08:28 AM
1

Huh? How have you so quickly verified that the Duluth model, and it's widespread implementation in government policy among a wide array of jurisdictions, has not caused men decades later to not report DV in this data?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 08:26 AM
2

Having sex is pretty much the same as getting married under Judio-Christianity. Indeed, historically, if a man was found to have had sex with a woman, he was expected to ask her parents for approval to marry her. So a modern day question is: If you are a woman who doesn't want to marry a divorced man because he is tainted, how do you justify ever agreeing to marry in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:58 AM
1

How did you guys meet anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:49 AM
1

In reality there's a lot of lying and false promises indeed that do need to go along with this for this to work. Firstly is the lies that come up when discussing sex, because you can never say that the reality is you preferred someone else for some certain sexual things. And then there's the false promise of "forsaking all others", because the reality is we sometimes reminisce about previous sexual partners or situations, and some even masturbate to it. Which is why cheating creates this rage fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:47 AM
0

You NEED to tell him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:34 AM
1

It's what you are doing to us?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 07:33 AM
2

You found a source but it wasn't THE source.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:18 AM
2

The duluth model is relevant because that's what is used in policy and we see the outcome in this data. Men are less likely than women to report a DV incident. Thus women are more likely to report DV incident than men. And so, with relationships involving two women, we see more DV incidents reported, because there is a higher percentage of women. It's not that hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:12 AM
6

What's the difference here?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:08 AM
3

Summary: The only thing being clearly proved here, is that the Duluth model is causing male DV victims to not make reports. And why would they? There's no mens shelters, the police place them in custody without bail, they lose access to their children, they pay tens of thousands for lawyers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:57 AM
3

But you speculate this: Looking once again at the 2010 data it says that lesbians are most likely to report minor incidences such as pushing and slapping. If the reported incidents are adjusted for severity the finding was that there was no statistical difference in domestic violence between lesbian and homosexual male relationships. Essentially you are arguing that if we adjust the data so that lesbians don't commit the most DV, then we have clear proof that lesbians don't commit the most DV. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:48 AM
4

And given the high incidents of men being held in custody without bail even when they made the initial report, with DVOs and no mens shelters, it's an surprising result.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:40 AM
3

This is nonsense. The only way we can get close to your hypothesis is to fully embrace your assertion that, given a DV incident, women are more likely to report more DV than men. As you write here: Another common assertion is that while lesbian relationships have the highest rate male homosexual relationships have the lowest rates. Looking once again at the 2010 data it says that lesbians are most likely to report minor incidences such as pushing and slapping. If the reported incidents are adjus…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:29 AM
10

You should disagree because taking all groups together, the highest reporters are women. Even when it's a lesbian relationship, we see here, rather than the obvious answer is that women report DV more, we instead get these wild ideas about men beating women into being gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:19 AM
8

We don’t know though. It could also be only male perpetrators. The point is there is not conclusive data to claim that lesbians commit DV at the highest rat Again. Just like yesterday, you have nothing but a hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:16 AM
3

I had the same argument with the OP yesterday, conclusion is, they are only hypothesising.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:14 AM
4

Obviously women who have experienced severe violence from male partners or family members are likely to become lesbians due to the trauma of these experiences and that How is it obvious that men turn women gay, again? Another common assertion is that while lesbian relationships have the highest rate male homosexual relationships have the lowest rates. Looking once again at the 2010 data it says that lesbians are most likely to report minor incidences such as pushing and slapping. If the reported…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:07 AM
–

The women in HR at my work were found distributing an excel file of male candidates they blacklisted from interviews, for reasons such as going to an all boys school, seeming sexist, mansplaining their resumes...etc
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:07 AM
–

Robots can love men back.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 10:53 PM
–

The only thing discouraging women from these roles is themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 10:46 PM
9

Jabalpur is 80% Hindu. Does this mean that the Hindu Marriage Act would also be applied, or another Act? Does the woman in the live-in relationship would require to hand over all assets to the man?
/r/MensRights25/05/24 05:22 PM
0

It's not hard, using the balance of probabilities. Could you come up with a more reasonable counter-argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:55 PM
0

What's more to know about them. They're wearing the outfit for charity?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:54 PM
-1

Wouldn't porn desentize this. Anyway it's a bit Madonna-Whore complex of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:45 PM
-1

You are following them around and being repetitious.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:39 PM
-2

I'm getting sick of seeing tattoos.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:38 PM
-1

I think we need to stop looking at their bodies and start wondering what's truly going through their brains?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:35 PM
0

Objectification aside, if a person is wearing skimpy clothing, don't you question why?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:33 PM
-1

Perhaps take a break from this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:25 PM
-1

It's harassment. People need to know their boundaries. It's no good trying to use your gender as justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:15 PM
1

But also, if they've been out drinking, and they usually have, they're utterly crackers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:13 PM
-2

You are crossing the line here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:04 PM
1

She's a "I'm trying to get lucky" woman, looking for a guy with a cuckold fetish.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:01 PM
1

Can I get that in a chart?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 03:53 PM
0

That's okay America.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 03:52 PM
-2

They can obviously be trying to get opportunities to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 03:50 PM
0

It's worse than that. They've got no pockets because they carry all their baggage around in their heads.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 03:44 PM
1

Bad Idea, ignore them, they're nothing but trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 03:38 PM
2

Buddy, I think you and I both know that in the UK, these women are trouble and avoid all contact with them for as much as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 03:33 PM
1

Most men get exactly what they want: one sex partner in a committed relationship. Oh boy are you going to be disappointed. Women lose interest in sex in a committed relationship. But sex isn't the reason why they want the relationship - they want it for your commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 01:21 PM
1

There's probably four categories you need to consider: Active AF / Active BB: women who actively chase Chad at college then later BB, they want a relationship with Chad but settle for a situationship of being his plate. Later find a husband who thinks she doesn't like sex much, which is kinda true because she's ticked everything in her bucket list and there's more important things now. Passive AF / Active BB: women who are too busy and mistrusting for relationships at college, career is more imp…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 11:58 AM
3

The thing about a median of 8, is that's EXACTLY the number of sex partners women report wanting to have, whereas for men it was 36, from a survey I recently read. So, if you think about that, is when it comss to sex, women are entirely having their cake and eating it to, whereas men aren't. And it appears that women seriously do make a conscious decision to have all their fun regarding sex first, tick off their sex bucket list, then get into a committed relationship. Whereas men in majority pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 10:53 AM
3

College men have less sex partners than men not at college, and this has been showed in surveys since the 1960s. There's less survey data on women, however that data shows college women have more sex partners. So, immediately off the bat, college men are sexually incompatible with colleagule women in their cohort.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 01:08 AM
4

So your assertion of bias is just an hypothesis?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 10:22 PM
4

They lump LGBTQ people together, except when it comes to women that currently identified as lesbian/bisexual. Hmmm...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 09:21 PM
5

Rather gynocentric, how do you explain away the discrepancy between this and gay male couples data? Is it the misogyny myth?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 09:08 PM
2

That's interesting, you entered into a domestic violence situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 08:51 PM
3

As a woman, you can call the cops on a guy and have him locked up with bail refused and he can die in prison and nobody will give a shit. https://www.npr.org/2023/02/23/1158738690/police-custody-deaths The papers won't print it because it's just a regular Wednesday. But please do tell us about the bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 08:27 PM
1

A deadbedroom isn't a simple refusal of sex! A dead bedroom is when a partner shuts sex out of the relationship altogether through stonewalling, defensiveness, criticism and contempt. John Gottman lists these as the "Four horsemen of the apocalypse" when it comes to marriage, and highly predicts a divorce within 6 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 11:44 AM
24

For the same reasons false rape accusors aren't arrested? Because, as they state in their words, this can cause more victims to not come forward.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 06:35 AM
1

Sure, but then you'd have to admit to everyone that you have been sleeping with whores. And that makes you no better than guys who have slept with whores. THE HORROR!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 06:48 PM
5

I wonder what the difference would be between people living in urban environments vs rural environments. Because, anyone who's risked exposure would tell you having someone else there could save your life.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 11:45 PM
8

The investigation is leaked to the media, yet again we see more defamation.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 12:32 PM
15

Wikipedia well known to be completely broken by these feminists. It comes up regularly here.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 12:20 PM
8

Over a year ago they slapping 3 day bans on everyone for being "too incel", fun times were had.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 08:13 AM
7

This forum seems to be the exception to that rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 08:01 AM
-1

It was not the case that she had no legal identity. My question is, how would civil administration have functioned otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:41 AM
2

In that period of history, under the common law of Coverture, the husband administered and underwrote the household financials and was personally liable for any criminal charges regarding bad debts, unpaid taxes and fines...etc Bankruptcy was a crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 06:16 AM
-2

But how would the crime of bankruptcy be bought to justice during those times without Coverture?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 05:13 AM
-1

But you wrote that everything written here is "shamelessly false and willfully dishonest"? That's a big allegation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 04:44 AM
2

A debtor was a man who through bankruptcy could be jailed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 04:35 AM
1

Where?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 04:29 AM
0

Yeah so could go about explaining your allegation that everything written here is "shamelessly false and willfully dishonest"? Because that quote alone doesn't pass muster.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 04:22 AM
13

There seem to be a swinging pendulum here between this and the TERFs. When the topic of consent, rape, and domestic violence comes up, the class is asked to return to their gender binary seating positions, with clear instructions as to which gender is in the right, and which is in the wrong. I've wondered how long these things will coexist before there's an outright civil war between these feminist factions.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:34 AM
2

Don't worry. It's not a good look when they have to suppress MensRights like this. Stuff like this ages like milk.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 01:07 AM
2

Blonde Bimbo is the slang term.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 10:27 PM
2

It's not very convincing. A bimbo is a blonde woman lacking intelligence, you are trying to re-term the word so to deride him, and it comes off as insecure.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 10:23 PM
1

Mary mother of God, the issue is made to be a gender issue, why? Because women then disproportionately receive the focus. This measure can be used across a majority of issues women raise - if they're making it a gender issue then ignore them until they stop doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 10:19 PM
1

So the point is women objectify men. Men see this and just consider women to be full of shit when complaining about objectification.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 09:20 PM
0

Obviously I didn't get it from cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 04:09 PM
2

But again....that's something women do in majority too...this is baffling.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 04:08 PM
-4

Women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 12:52 PM
7

Lie back on the couch, and tell me, what was your relationship with your mother like?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 11:25 AM
-2

But that belief is in majority a female belief. The female majority believes it is fine to use men for sex because they're just objects...etc Women don't stop and tell other women that this is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 11:19 AM
8

The context of the tweet was in regards to Greta Thunberg's distasteful tweet: He said all this began following a social media spat between accused human trafficker Andrew Tate and environmental activist Greta Thunberg, during which Ms Thunberg derided the size of Mr Tate’s penis. In a tweet, Professor Timming observed that “demeaning sexual jokes” appeared fair game when directed from women to men, but not the other way around. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/human-resources-professor…
/r/MensRights21/05/24 10:55 AM
2

It's more accurate to say, the higher a woman's income, the more she consumes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 10:23 AM
0

The more a woman consumes, the ummm.. what was it...um men have less power over us because...umm...retail therapy...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 10:22 AM
3

We used to have rules against this kind of circle jerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 10:20 AM
5

Man you folks are unhinged.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 10:18 AM
5

Who's insecure, again?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 10:16 AM
–

If it's not systemic, what will happen to all the government funding and non-profit organisations making a killing over this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 01:56 AM
2

What about feeling pressured to think?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 01:49 AM
1

Naahh. Keep telling us it's unfair that you aren't top dog and it must be tradwife theory stopping you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 01:46 AM
-1

If this is true, then the best way to fight this is for feminists to stop complaining about the gender distribution in the top paying jobs. LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 10:48 PM
–

The occasion where society does hold women responsible: https://www.theguardian.com/culture/article/2024/may/07/tasmanias-mona-to-challenge-decision-to-let-men-into-ladies-only-art-lounge
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 07:10 PM
–

Are you aware that you have no underwear?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 06:59 PM
6

It's a silly hypothetical. Women will not allow documentation of their sexual behaviour like this. Additionally, feminists want laws around sex to be like a right of exclusive occupancy - men should ask to enter, and if at any time she asks him to leave he must do so. They'd only allow this as a unilateral contract with a governing body for she is an anonymous party, essentially a license for men to be allowed sex with women. And we are not too far away from this reality - that men will require …
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:50 AM
3

Once you do sex work you are essentially stuck doing it because no one will hire you How will they find out?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 11:37 AM
1

Anti-discrimination laws are the reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 11:36 AM
–

The windows behind the bar are actually mirrors.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 08:42 AM
-1

Where are the good men gone material this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 01:56 AM
2

You know getting married isn't going to change any of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:49 AM
-1

They are trying to force men though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 10:57 PM
0

That's at best a bike pump in a canoe for skills needed in an LTR. In truth all it does is brings in her sexual problems into the relationship. Nobody wants a woman who's not interested in sex because she's done it all before and didn't like how that guy did it, or compares you to them. And it's just a skill for knowing how to fuck randos / cheat. Perhaps your just looking at this for brief sexual gratification and not an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 10:33 PM
2

But it's sexual coercion for her to knowingly hide such important information or lie to men just to get her needs met.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 10:21 PM
0

Well they shouldn't. Neither should men. If you're going to make the decision to be in a stable, committed, long-term relationship with a man/woman, it ideally would be an informed one. But that wouldn't maximise the outcome for the woman. Let's consider paternal fraud, for example, an informed decision by the man would lead to the woman having less access to resources, and would lose the evolutionary battle against a woman who avoids an informed decision. Another example is hidden estrus, this …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:29 PM
1

The sexual revolution was about changing cultural norms regarding the ridiculous "purity" of specifically female sexuality. It wasn't because those norms never changed, because men never bought into it. And that's why women keep their past a secret even today. I guess it was marketed to women as such but it was just all about selling dirty magazines, selling sex to women, selling pills to women...etc, consumerism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:18 PM
3

What they're saying though, is the genders are the same, or should be the same, and also may even say they are pro-feminist because they affirm women's sexuality...etc, but expect women to be more casual in return. But that's not TRP because TRP says men and women are different, that women are less sexual then men but more sexual than what they let on, and TRP never complains that women need to have more casual sex, because TRP says they ARE having casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 10:34 AM
6

No no no, you don't get it. She's trying to hide this. If women were transparent about such things she'll never get all her needs met by various men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:56 AM
1

Then it's perfectly reasonable to not commit to such women, as their sexual dichotomy causes a dead bedroom relationship and there's no negotiating desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:54 AM
3

That's cuttlefishing - hanging around women and trying to be a sneaky fucker to get sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:39 AM
3

OPs really saying, women go "I don't do casual (anymore)" or "I don't do casual (unless you're the right guy)".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:15 AM
4

They're complaining about how women treat it as a phase. Infact, they treat sex as a phase entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:13 AM
5

Her sexual past shows her dichotomy toward men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 09:12 AM
1

No because women don't play by those rules themselves - if they want sex they go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:41 AM
4

No way, because she will take her 8pm foodie call with the new guy and then her midnight bootie call with her ex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:39 AM
2

So why do women complain that they feel pressure to have sex to keep a guy, if the sexual revolution was about giving you choice? The sexual revolution was just an extension to consumerism. It wasn't like it some kind social reformation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:35 AM
1

OP is discussing modern women's sexual dichotomy. Whilst they write that men who want fun without commitment are considered immature, that doesn't mean women don't partake in it, but that they consider it as part of their "coming of age" prior to commitment. That women who say "I don't do casual" really mean "I don't do casual anymore". So what modern women are therefore saying is "I don't do casual" means they've lost their curiosity for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:24 AM
3

Do you honestly think guys are complaining that women don't do enough casual sex?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 08:01 AM
7

It may be a political campaign, but it is unreasonable to call it a hate campaign. They've left themselves wide open this. They will lose in court.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 10:41 PM
2

Unapologetically misandrist.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 10:38 PM
21

You are right, and it's rather depressing. And what's worse is women seem to develop a hatred toward male sexuality, whilst dating, which they unleash onto their unsuspecting husbands.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 01:05 PM
–

I think we just unified quantum physics.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 09:59 AM
29

Just a point. Generally speaking married people build wealth better than single people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 09:07 AM
–

When I posted here that more straight men are more open to dating bisexual women than straight women with bisexual men because they want threesomes, many men got mad. But literally this is the case. They aren’t more open minded, accepting, and equitable. They want threesomes. Many women got mad that day too. 'Twas an unholy bloodbath.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 09:05 AM
–

It's hypocritical to claim there's historically been a "patriarchy" that's forced women into gender roles while overlooking how society forces men into gender roles, and making no social advancements on this, as is the case here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 08:11 AM
0

Wait til your 45 and demand an IVF doctor give you a baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 04:19 AM
2

Thrown around the DB forums is - a third of couples remain fucking like bunnies, a third are in a dead bedroom and a third divorce. The stats are interesting - some couples are at every day but when it gets less than sex once a week, couples quickly have sex rarely - like twice a year. Habits seem to play a role (e.g. sex on Saturday). Couples that never have sex are rare (2-5%), it seems dead bedrooms have maintenance sex twice a year, I guess so to technically not show complete abandonment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 02:35 AM
–

Nobody is telling men they can have it all in terms of their career. Men don't have careers anymore, un majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 02:25 AM
1

Because love and lust aren't integrated. She can't orgasm with her husband because it feels incestuous to her but she can orgasm with strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 04:51 PM
1

Yes, and while women think men are stupid regarding sex, we do pick up on these things and it breaks their hearts. But it's disingenuous to the relationship, because while the relationship may even involve children, the relationship will always be damaged and bearly functional.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:41 PM
1

Where do you suppose we are going?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:27 PM
2

Huh? How does Freud's paper "On the Universal Tendency to Debasement in the Sphere of Love” justify promiscuity, again?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 11:06 AM
15

Perhaps, but they could have kept their differentiator and their small segment of the market. I also think the market needs a dating app for people looking to have children - because guess what? New surveys show young women don't want children but men do. Surveys are yet to show if they change their minds at 28.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 08:00 AM
–

I think it's done to signal social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 07:45 AM
-2

The term has been around since the 1960s
/r/MensRights17/05/24 07:37 AM
3

I think John Gottman, for example, has provided women with numerous books on dating and relationships. Women don't read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 07:31 AM
0

There's probably more to unpack to it than that, there's clearly a dichotomy between what they say they want and what they actually end up seeking. It is obvious they aren't telling you the whole truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 06:44 AM
-3

That's because of the "beauty and the beast" motif, which is extraordinarily pervasive in female erotica. E.g. 50 shades, and it's also a feature of BDSM which is women's preferred pornography - to take pain from a master and thank him for orgasms afterward. The master himself is not monogamous however, if she can withstand the pain from him, he will fall for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 06:28 AM
-2

These are your takes on what they said though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 06:26 AM
1

But obviously you do prioritize sex, for certain relationships with men. Just not the man you are in a committed relationship with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 06:06 AM
-1

We don't want that. We want to be treated as equals, and not objectified.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 05:44 AM
-3

Then why are you giving us less?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 05:39 AM
88

I don't understand why Bumble didn't open up the app so that you apply a setting for being the first to initiate or receive, rather than tie it to gender. This would have avoided the legal action against them.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:35 AM
5

They are also ill treated by feminism. Erin Pizzey's theories and work would have helped her stop this cycle of abuse.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:32 AM
2

You are going to get offended by this but that's not the Madonna-Whore complex. But some feminist gibberish about it so to justify promiscuity. Madonna-whore complex derived from Freud's work in analysing men who's wives sent them to him because they didn't want to have sex with them, in analysing these men he found out they often were not virgins but had slept with prostitutes. This was before wide spread use of birh control. Today, we get the more of the reverse, actually. Today we get women w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 05:14 AM
-1

Germaine Greer wrote "the female eunuch" which is like the female version of "the rational male" by Rollo Tomassi, except it was written in age where women didn't realize they were having casual sex with the top 1% and then getting married - they thought men were having as much sex as what they were. She's got a Madonna-Whore complex, there's no doubt about it. But, she's a TERF and she used to use her looks to get attention - raunchy pictures with Led Zeppelin and such. She's ignored now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 03:47 AM
–

Try using this ">" at the start of sentences.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 03:36 AM
-2

The gender difference in the UCSB survey regarding wanting to have children is a real eye opener. Arguments are that women change their minds later in life and want children. Is there any data to this? In anycase it's pretty weak for a woman to argue that she wants children after she's lost peak SMV and has had many sexual relationships where she didn't want children. Seems to me, men really need to ask early and ask often if a woman wants children, when dating 18-23 year olds. This will likely …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 03:15 AM
-1

Don't you mean, it exists because you want something less than sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:59 AM
3

Including the word "potential spouse" shifts it. Branch swinging: hot boyfriend now, rich husband later
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:33 AM
2

They also want power and money, being leftie is a social status to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:29 AM
1

They are terrible numbers. Drop this idea that women will come around. First rule: Listen to what she says the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:27 AM
1

I'm not making a straw man because women on this very sub say that they believe men will fuck anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:18 AM
2

That's right, in 8 years time, after all the sex and bad boys, find Jesus and a husband. This is pure women are wonderful.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:15 AM
1

Career is more important, women are wonderful effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:11 AM
1

Look at all the "women are wonderful" replies. Seems to me, men need to ask this question assertively when dating!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:10 AM
1

Leftie women want power and money?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:09 AM
1

An untaped market I suppose but looking at the entire response, seems to me Passport Bros is the way to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:08 AM
2

Greed is good?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:05 AM
1

Patriarchy theory appears as me as extraordinarily non-academic because, even a rudimentary analysis should show that historical laws, precedents and cultural views were simply sexual orientation-role and gender-role based. But that does not imply patriarchy - it implies the opposite, that men also had roles imposed on them, both sexually and in gender. However, the oddity is these gender roles still exist today, but for men only. And so this indicates Patriachy theory is a political motivation …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:04 AM
1

Patriarchy theory appears as me as extraordinarily non-academic because, even a rudimentary analysis should show that historical laws, precedents and cultural views were simply sexual orientation-role and gender-role based. But that does not imply patriarchy - it implies the opposite, that men also had roles imposed on them, both sexually and in gender. However, the oddity is these gender roles still exist today, but for men only. And so this indicates Patriachy theory is a political motivation …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 02:03 AM
2

The last question is a mike drop for Passport Bros - 80% of guys want kids, only a third of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 01:46 AM
5

Patriarchy theory appears as me as extraordinarily non-academic because, even a rudimentary analysis should show that historical laws, precedents and cultural views were simply sexual orientation-role and gender-role based. But that does not imply patriarchy - it implies the opposite, that men also had roles imposed on them, both sexually and in gender. However, the oddity is these gender roles still exist today, but for men only. And so this indicates Patriachy theory is a political motivation …
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:33 AM
12

You can generally take Colleges and the like to review at a Administrative tribunal or court. They keep this well hidden and always try to say "let's just keep this between us, okay?"
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:17 AM
2

It's the "beauty and the beast" archetype. It pops up in erotica ALL THE TIME, like 50 shades. He will be the Dom with used options who rotates through women, and she will be the sub with unused options who takes enough pain for him to fall for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:14 AM
1

Interesting, can you expand on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:06 AM
1

It's relevant to your assertion that she considers an "unknown variable is the guy’s desire". That cannot be, if she considers it that men will fuck anything, and particularly herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 12:01 AM
1

Really? What was his name? Benjamin Franklin?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:47 PM
–

Please reformat properly. Very newbie of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:45 PM
1

It's what it is, but not what women thinks it looks like.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:42 PM
1

So how do you unify that with this belief women have, that men will fuck anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:40 PM
–

WRONG. And actually, you'll debase men as being "virgins" or "sexually inexperienced".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:21 AM
-3

This isn't going to disprove the OPs thesis. As it's generally understood that the women secretly seek sex from these guys, not visa versa. Ever heard of the term to "I slipped into his DMs" - it's when a girl tries to start a "situationship" with a guy of higher SMV via secretly contacting him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:07 AM
41

The term is misused, as Erin Pizzey wrote in her seminal paper "Comparative Study of Battered Women And Violence-Prone Women", which caused her to receive death threats, unironically.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 01:49 AM
15

The thing about virgin shaming, is women often do it because virgin men make them feel bad. If men can't be debased as being unthinking sexually driven "beasts", it calls into questions the women's own behaviour toward men. For the life of me, I cannot understand why gender faculties and the like measure the sex partner count of men as a proxy of their market value. I suspect it's because these faculties are very 2nd wave feminism influenced, and are generally anti-marriage (even though the gay …
/r/MensRights16/05/24 12:51 AM
21

Stop giving them the grace to vent. Tell them you don't believe their version, that the other guy was a human, not a caricature, and there's two sides of a story. For example, that she wasn't "pumped and dumped" but that she, in her own agency, pursued sexual gratification from him. They will get angry at you, but will stop treating you like this.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 11:47 PM
1

If she is under 25. Not courage - frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 11:29 PM
-5

Not specifically. OP's wanting to know if they matched with them. Had a hookup...etc
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 11:11 PM
0

Wouldn't it be more accurate to create a profile of an athlete, entertainer...etc and see the responses?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:59 PM
1

Way more than 10%, perhaps only 10% actively, the rest have done it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:54 PM
1

Australia is a horrible place. Qualified privilege already protects genuine victims when reporting crimes yet they want to change the law for the other situations where qualified privilege isn't covered, like malice: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/may/15/victoria-sexual-assault-victims-law-bill-amendment-defamation-immunity
/r/MensRights15/05/24 06:39 PM
3

Australia, again.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 05:47 AM
3

I think it's more to the point that they should priotize decency in their partner. That this is the big issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 11:07 PM
2

Australia will allow libel if a sexual assult is reported. Batshit insane: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/may/15/victoria-sexual-assault-victims-law-bill-amendment-defamation-immunity
/r/MensRights14/05/24 09:54 PM
2

Hey passport bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 09:45 PM
8

Feminists always talk the most shit and know the least about reality hard pass I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:50 PM
2

What is this supposed to mean? The feminist organisations avoid open discussion current legislation and procedures, including bail. But only discuss the changes they want, which they rarely get because it's usually legally dysfunctional and will impinge on mens basic rights. But in doing so they mislead. For example, it's becoming common for prosecutiors to try squeeze out a confession through indicating that a courtcase will publicise their name. So, the man is scared by the public protesting t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:38 PM
0

They say that on the show to bring the women back to earth. They all talk about how they're going to marry the top 0.1%.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 09:36 AM
2

They'll do it if apple sells it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 09:33 AM
1

She can load up CHAD-10000, with four sixes - 6/6/6 plus one extra 6.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 08:37 AM
2

If it fixes her post promiscuous phase low-libido she'll be fine with wearing a headset.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 08:21 AM
5

Robots replaced men decades ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 06:03 AM
2

Woah!!!! It's not that simple, in many anglo common law jurisdictions the legislation states something about recklessness, specifically this means reckless disregard to her consent, and specifically inadvertent recklessness. I generally agree with your premise, they don't discuss current legislation or rulings but prefer to circulate redefinitions of what they want. And they prefer to keep men somewhat in the dark as to their own legal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 04:24 AM
2

But maybe we can put on a headset while having sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 04:10 AM
6

It will impact instathots and OF revenue big time. And the technology is just about already here.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:19 AM
5

Correct
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:18 AM
11

LOL, dating app irony, I love it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:06 AM
1

Relevant to this, allegedly it's somehow going to cause feminism to lose 30 years of work, as AI will generate beauty for which they cannot compete with: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-06/chelsea-bonner-fight-against-ai-models/103769766 Imagine being in a world where you no longer have an audience following you around in your pocket, because some robot took this job, and how angry would you feel? Surely this sets women back to a time without internet. The horror
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:30 AM
3

But if she does that, then what will follow is quite a lot of questions about her drinking/drug use, and how she interacted with him and visa versa. But it's becoming a problem that women think that if they are drunk it was rape. Just last year an Australian magistrate threw out a case and publicly chastized the prosecution because the woman was a serial offender of getting blackout drunk and filing rape reports: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-07/nsw-sexual-assault-cases-trial-review/103556…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:10 AM
2

I'm okay, they obviously aren't okay but yes I've seen the printed placards at rallies. I've read follow-up editorials justifying this rubbish.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:30 PM
8

It's a contentious topic, but if the victim changes her story it undermines her reliability as a witness, and this is very very common. However, courts have adduced and reasoned with expert evidence that victims often are in shock for days afterwards and appear to not think it's rape. But, victims also hide their own sexual behaviour when on the chair and can start throwing allegations around and this is a huge problem. The Lehrmann defamation case in Australia is a good treatise of how the cour…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:28 PM
2

You need to ask a Barrister in many jurisdictions as it's not common for organisations to circulate such information. It's more common that organisations circulate what they want rape laws to be (e.g. "enthusiastic consent"), or just circulate general misinformation like "do better" and "we'd rather meet a bear in the forest". There's a whole industry built around women's grievances and hatred of men, they get funding for it and don't want men armed with knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:22 PM
0

"Sorry about lastnight, here's a nice cupatea, be a darl and don't tell anyone."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 09:20 PM
5

A rape kit isn't required to charge for rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 09:11 PM
0

This isn't legally correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 09:04 PM
11

Things you can do are: Understand the laws and process. Understand what constitutes rape and sexual assault in your jurisdiction, particularly around alcohol. Understand what the legal terms mean, like reckless disregard. Gather evidence. Take contemporanous notes, very important as the court will try figure out who's story changed when. Email and texts can be adduced as evidence. Nightclubs and bars usually have good CCTV footage. Example: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/05/us/usc-rape-case-dro…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 09:00 PM
28

Wow! The correlation with feminist countries is quite alarming.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 12:16 PM
13

I don't understand how these institutions enforce gender pronouns, teach gender fluidity and sexual fluidity. But when it comes to writing papers on sexual assault and domestic violence, it's decidedly gender binary and hetrosexual. How do they unify this? This paper, if they did both genders and did sexual orientations, it may explain more about the sampling and methodology.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 10:23 AM
1

Betty Dodson was showing women how to use the hitachi wand in the late 1960s.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 08:18 AM
2

So you just run up to them and go "hey guys I masturbate too!"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 08:06 AM
-1

Don't listen to the bullshit here. If she can't communicate about sex, kick her to the curb, it's a dead bedroom in the making and none of the bullshit here will change a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:44 AM
0

Some women orgasm from anterior fornix stimulation and others don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:39 AM
12

Men serving in the armed forces should be outraged by this.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 12:53 AM
15

This is true. Feminism is an industry that exists the way it is, to exist the way it is.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 11:43 PM
19

What I find extraordinary is that in Australia they are using social media platforms and self-authored websites such as "Destroy the Joint" to come up with figures and statistics themselves, to then get funding to try de-platform their detractors like this. They are literally getting government funding to de-platform their political opposition, not through merit, but through supplying reasons via their own self-generated content.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 11:39 PM
1

After too many partners, sex becomes less important and less enjoyable in a relationship setting. This is why men find a low n-count is very important in a long term relationship, with research and lived experience backing this finding up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 11:01 PM
24

what happens if a girl accuses me of sexually assaulting her Understand the processes Be prepared with evidence to confute
/r/MensRights12/05/24 10:09 PM
1

$$$
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 09:16 PM
1

What about Tokyo then?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 09:16 PM
1

Somehow, I think salary would explain the differences in experience that guys are reporting between big cities and small cities.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 09:06 PM
2

The courts don't assign blame like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 08:33 PM
2

I've never seen a prosecution or defence make such statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 08:20 PM
4

Actual court cases show something wildly different to these unreported studies: https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/family-court-judges-to-be-trained-about-the-malicious-use-of-false-accusations/
/r/MensRights12/05/24 08:05 PM
59

Filing false domestic violence charges so to win custody is a huge problem in other jurisdictions.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:08 PM
2

An anecdotal example of a false positive? How can they be "anecdotal examples" when a district judge went through all matters? Frankly, I would trust the magistrates level of reasoning against yours. more talking about a situation where the woman did in fact not consent, but the man was too reckless or stupid to realise. To test reckless disregard, we cannot just rely on the victims version of events.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 11:12 AM
2

Mens rea is necessary for a perp, but not not necessarily a victim. Then it's necessary for the definition of rape. If all these cases lacked mens rea that would just mean a different problem of the same size- that men have no fucking clue about consent or how to get it. How do you explain this: https://np.reddit.com/r/auslaw/comments/18j0tmb/lazy_and_perhaps_politically_expedient_judge/ The woman thought she was raped yet didn't understand consent. More information: https://www.abc.net.au/news/…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 10:47 AM
3

No, they don't. I wrote this before, I've never seen a modern judgement made like that
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 06:55 AM
1

But it's most likely wildly wrong. And it's extraordinarily incoherent and conflicting. Particularly when we see these figure's from the same circles saying 1/6 women think they were raped. There are papers showing rapists are usually "sexually successful men" by these metrics. But moreso, a high partner count is indicative of a lot of failed relationships, or some kind of similar issue at hand. But the researchers rarely ever look at these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:12 AM
0

How is it that researchers use a man's number of sex partners as a proxy for gauging their sexual success, I've never understood that. It implies some extraordinary broad assumptions about society. The biggest assumption is that society is just a bunch of fucking liars.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 12:33 AM
1

What do women get critized and blamed upon? I've never seen a magistrate or tribunal take that approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 11:09 PM
0

You aren't being reasonable. He never harmed you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:07 PM
2

She probably has no case for defamation then. It was already in the public domain.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 11:22 AM
9

Rape is defined as any completed or attempted unwanted vaginal (for women), oral, or anal penetration through the use of physical force (such as being pinned or held down, or by the use of violence) or threats to physically harm and includes times when the victim was drunk, high, drugged, or passed out and unable to consent That's NOT the definition of rape in a majority of jurisdictions. There's also the concept of "mens rea" or reckless disregard. The point being, the ruling of rape cannot be …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 08:38 AM
10

Australia is doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 07:03 AM
1

How?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:36 AM
1

I don't think it's divorce unfairness per se, but more that the research showing women increasingly losing interest in sex in long-term relationships is being presented as a womens only issue and that's perpetuating anxierty among men regarding commitment. It's really something that needs to be tackled head on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 02:12 AM
2

Collect all facts and immediately take notes of everything ASAP.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:27 PM
–

It demonstrates women's lack of social and emotional development. Have you ever wondered if you suffer from actor-observor bias on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:53 PM
–

It's a kafka trap.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:32 PM
–

Has our answer accomplished it's mission? Maybe a little, but it has caused another problem: we now just look silly. They're coming away thinking, "Was what they were saying about women and logic right all along" Not silly, but hateful. It confirms the opinion that women hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:29 PM
–

Let's be honest, what's going on is: A woman walks down the street, She sees a guy look at her, Her hand immediately swipes left in the air - nothing happens. She tries again, swipe left, swipe left - he's still there walking down the street. She flys into a panic fearing retribution from him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:19 PM
1

Why are women in Seoul so into "cutesy" hello-kitty like bullshit. They're like what the Japanese women were like 30 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:36 PM
2

It ain't covid. It's OLD and social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:24 PM
6

In the 70s, in Australia, when my father died, my mother had to produce his death certificate before she was allowed a passport (without his permission). That was the same for men - persons wishing to proceed abroad required consent of spouse. A key difference in the 1970s Australia is, under s.56 of the National Service Act, men weren't allowed passports unless they produced a consent form from the Department of Defence / Department of Labor.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 08:36 AM
5

What is "gendered violence"? In a country advocating non-gender exclusive pronouns, violence is now an engendered activity, that can be tallied and publicised before the police have commenced investigating, yet alone before a jury has made a ruling?
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:36 AM
51

Australia is just going through drafting their government budget allocations and this noise about "gendered violence reckoning" is just about trying to organise a cabinet to continue the gravy-train, because the government states are going broke.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 03:00 AM
5

It wasn't accepted that there could be rape within marriage get your hand off it. Being married was a legal defense to a historically conviction of rape which awarded heavy imprisonment and hanging. The idea being, society accepted that men carried legal risks for having sex outside of marriage.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 01:14 AM
4

I'm confident you don't understand my jurisdiction. It just doesn't make sense that a bank would not allow a deposit account. A ledger account, I understand. The point being, there would have been a matter in law involved. For example, it should be obvious that a magistrate would be incredibly reluctant to bankrupt a women under common law in that period. Note the distinction between insolvency and bankruptcy. But inter-war superannuation was common.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 11:56 PM
13

A question I've always wondered. Were women bankrupted back then? Most of the laws were implicitly gendered on this. A debtor was a man who could be thrown in prison.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:40 PM
11

I doubt that. It was credit that required cosigning, not deposits. What kind of bank would turn away a deposit account?
/r/MensRights09/05/24 10:38 PM
2

I suppose he's asking if it's one of those things that he should accept: https://www.gottman.com/blog/managing-conflict-solvable-vs-perpetual-problems/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 10:26 PM
4

It's actually one of the four horsemen, contempt: https://www.gottman.com/blog/the-four-horsemen-recognizing-criticism-contempt-defensiveness-and-stonewalling/ These are red flags you should look for.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 10:20 PM
3

She said that I should pay for the sins of my brothers (other men) Be the martyr that women want you to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 10:15 PM
3

You can only hope they do, right? How would you be if this didn't start until you moved in together and couldn't get out?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 10:14 PM
0

How's this not most Western woman's reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:00 PM
4

But it's definitely noticed now, that whenever there's a budget being drafted, they do this.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 08:46 AM
0

That's the thing. Who's lying? We could put in infrastructure to get a record of information regarding sex, to determine facts. But women don't want it. Women want to have "sneaky" sexual experiences that remain hidden. So the expectation is that the system cater for both collecting information about what men do with women while not collecting information on what men did with women. So it's a broken system.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:27 AM
–

Speaking of delicate flowers, they ban all the men that post there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:19 AM
–

One does not simply go to jail for no reason - but feminists are working on changing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:17 AM
–

The thing about TwoX though, is that surely there's fake accounts trolling them good with their fake stories and they fall for it good.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:00 AM
27

As part of a host of changes announced last week to address domestic violence, the federal government has committed to funding a new Stop it at the Start campaign to counter the influence of misogynistic content online And there we go, it wasn't about domestic violence after all. How despicable: https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/what-really-happened-before-anthony-albanese-branded-liar-over-speech-at-domestic-violence-rally/news-story/1bd3861714a495e387a0cf3a18aea9e0
/r/MensRights09/05/24 06:08 AM
12

It was budget time in Australia, that's why they created so much noise - for further funding. It's an entire industry that exists as it is, to exist as it is.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 01:48 AM
87

He didn't sue. As far as I can tell, He made a complaint, and the Minister referred it to administrative tribunal and he ABSOLUTELY HIT IT OUT THE PARK at the session and they utterly lost their case to continue the discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 11:12 PM
4

Because of Australia's unashamed vigilantism and hatred of young men and boys.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:16 PM
2

It's relevant because of the vigilante approach being taken in Australia. I think some of the students may have a defamation case against the newspapers. The newspapers won't be able to argue qualified privilege, as we saw in the lehrmann case, and they'll have to prove each and everyone of them did it, which is unlikely. Meanwhile, women call each other sluts at school and nothing is done about it, and I imagine that a front page editorial wouldn't be viewed as appropriate. But when it comes to…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:06 PM
1

It is different because it's just functional underwear.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:57 PM
2

You don't need to avoid people just because of those who express hatred toward you. Misandry exists but we don't need to give it power.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:54 PM
5

I'm tired of this vigilante attitude by the Australian media. I don't think the Australian media have qualified privilege and the parents students should sue for defamation.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:49 PM
2

Well there's no pressure on women to socialise with men and treat men as anything but objects.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:40 PM
0

Step 3. Waste other peoples time chasing you. Step 4. Open an only-fans account. Step 5. Join the porn industry.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 12:43 PM
12

I think dating apps are causing women to hate men more - primarily not because of how men are treating them, but because it's fueling unhealthy behaviour that is aggravating a male hatred in them. Firstly, there's the personality issues - there's a rise of narcissistic behaviour among young women and apps provide a great instrument for narcissistic supply, and a platform to idolise, devalue and discard men. Secondly, there's an explosion of the Madonna-Whore complex among young women, where as F…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:29 PM
3

I don't think he sued. I think what happened is he lodged a complaint under the anti-discrimination act, and the minister referred it to the Administrative tribunal and it followed from there. He appeared to have prepared his arguments very well, and I think he took them by surprise. I suspect he's a practising barrister or solicitor at least. He received alot of hate from Reddit, and the admins did nothing, they should take heed.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:02 AM
41

Ironically, it used to just be callled "Scouts", the girls club called "Guides".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:41 AM
2

The two other guys she was dating but not getting tingles for, because they were looking for a relationship and not just sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:37 AM
1

Yes, because she will be dating 3 guys and goes for the guy who making moves to get into her pants. But did you note before, I wrote that it's the husbands who will read a book about sex & relationships? Not the ex-.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 08:05 AM
9

And I'm saying, the way that happens is via responsive desire from a man's sexual advances. Women act like they are agent-less, and can't even read a book about this. Is there any wonder why men don't commit?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 06:50 AM
2

A majority of these situations happen because the relationship hits the problems with criticism, contempt, stonewalling and defensiveness or there's a loss of sexual interest after NRE.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 06:16 AM
16

Men who want relationships are classified as "naturally unattractive" because women have responsive desire, and so they "get the tingles" when men make sexual advances toward them, and they honestly think if a guys not doing it he can't do it. Altogether, women have no true interest in understanding men and how to have healthy relationships with men - it's too much like hard work and is patriarchal oppression. You give a couple a book on relationships and sex, only the husband will read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 05:46 AM
3

A libido anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 05:41 AM
4

You're wrong on all these propositions. Women do seek sneaky sex partners it's happened to me, and I've been propositioned for it and declined, I've seen it happen, I've seen it happen in large proportions among females away from home.... How can you argue this?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:20 AM
3

I don't think she's found in contempt of court (yet), she has been given order and says she has filed an appeal. However, the tribunal member noted that some of the behaviour written in the newspapers of what she did would have triggered further orders and investigation if the member had seen it or if it intimidated the applicant - fortunately for her they were both online that day.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:06 AM
2

It's a problem caused by the volumes of women seeking sneaky sex partners. These things would dissipate, along with rape, if women would allow society to see what is truly going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 03:30 AM
3

If a guy is not looking for a sentient fleshlight, what to you propose he do? Women will judge him immediately on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 03:04 AM
–

Back to the main point, males have more internal drive to want to approach. This isn’t a debate. Women don’t have that. Horniness and libido (testosterone) is why men feel compelled to approach and women don’t. It’s science. It’s biology. What about morality? If women tell men they prefer seeing bears in the woods. Wouldn't the man who's listening to them then not approach them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 02:12 AM
–

They approach for relationships though and try to use sex to get one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 02:06 AM
–

Women do need to handle rejection. They have sex with a guy who approaches them, he doesn't want an exclusive relationship. They are rejected. That's pretty much their interaction with men until their mid twenties until they start approaching guys for a relationship. Sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:57 AM
10

Cameras in a rest room will be a problem. She also says she's going to change it into a church: https://mona.net.au/blog/ . I am wondering if she could be ruled as being vexatious, she needs to be careful and stop treating it as a joke.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:20 AM
4

Says it was a lawsuit by the men There's a similar lawsuit in Australia and the woman is going to start a church: https://mona.net.au/blog/2024/05/interview-with-kirsha-kaechele-about-the-ladies-lounge
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:44 PM
3

It's curious that women don't want to put their best foot forward using their grasp of language - but instead, that's a man's job.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:42 PM
3

I've always wondered when there would be a return to considering dating apps as a bit too desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:40 PM
1

Not only have you not provided grounds, it's not even an argument, it's a grievance.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:05 PM
3

It's beyond that. The realm of reasoning is lost within the third paragraph. Feminism has moved from dogwhistling to wolfwhistling. Nobody is entitled to challenge this for fear of being labelled pathological
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 08:28 PM
34

Gotcha. So your labelling lonely men as pathologically entitled and that doesn't seem oppressive to you because that's how you treat men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:33 AM
-1

How would an estate leave these women penniless?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:26 AM
2

I have myself given in many times to men here who clearly state that they don't enjoy the company of women Women OTOH would rather meet a bear in the woods from what we’re reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 10:33 AM
2

I can't see why they wouldn't teach him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 10:27 AM
-1

Ok thanks for telling us that, I'll let the guys know, I'm sure they'll be disappointed - hey if you change your mind just tell us.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 09:52 AM
13

It's highly likely her misandry will spill into your relationship in the form of criticism and contempt: https://www.gottman.com/blog/this-one-thing-is-the-biggest-predictor-of-divorce/
/r/MensRights07/05/24 09:46 AM
8

How do you know these literacy circles don't just plain old hate men? There's a lot of victim playing in those spheres about men being seen as the best authors in history and men getting more shelf space in bookstores. Similarly in the fine arts.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 06:21 AM
5

Bigger question is, does she have what's needed for an LTR. Her past history says no.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:18 PM
3

Take contemporaneous notes and evidence, get their names and as much information as possible, ask your parents to speak to a lawyer, have the lawyer write a letter to the school.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 09:06 PM
3

If a rape case is dismissed in the court, that means a reasonable, impartial person was provided the evidence and could not find a verdict of rape. What she probably means is that the rape cases aren't followed through with prosecution. The reason for that is because the prosecution held the opinion that the court would not find a verdict of rape. Rape in Norway is defined as "obtaining sexual activity by means of violence or threats, or with someone who is unconscious or for other reasons unabl…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 08:36 PM
7

But here's the thing, she falsely accused you while in the course of her employment.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 07:19 PM
–

The scatterbrain is the scatterbrain.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 01:20 PM
–

Scatterbrain
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 01:00 PM
–

Did you just leave a DV shelter or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:59 PM
–

The woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:53 PM
–

Yes, she shouldn't waste her time in bad relationships because she hasn't got a lot of time before opportunities in life close.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:05 PM
–

It's not acceptable but as any marriage counsellor will tell you - it's usually the women who will stop going when the four horsenen of the apocalypse are discussed (criticism, contempt, stonewalling and defensiveness). Basically, a lot of people are really bad at relationships these days
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:00 PM
–

Because he will leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:57 AM
–

My hot take is: read John Gottman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:49 AM
–

And there's no shortage of problems this can cause a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:43 AM
3

There's usually another crime that can be charged instead of rape. Rape carries the death penalty in India. Indeed, rape used to carry the death penalty in most countries. I don't see them pushing for progress about this: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-63554474
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:26 PM
3

But men pay taxes too and they also work in the jobs that women don't want to work in. So they get doubly fucked over.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 03:22 PM
6

It was perhaps an idea in the post-war period, but it has evolved into a full blown industry. Do feminists get paid? Erin Prizzey made the comment in the 1980s that the battle she had within creating domestic violence shelters is that feminists wanted it to be a gender issue and not to support centres for males (including teenage boys getting beated by their parents), because they didn't want their reasons of funding diluted. Since then, the industry has only grown. I've noticed several times, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 03:16 PM
4

You missed the point about the PM hijacking the protest. But what about violence against men? Do you understand what they're asking? They want take away the rights of men, including bail and fair trial. But as I commented before, Erin Pizzey, do you know who she is? She believes domestic violence is reciprocal. You are a mess to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 02:49 PM
5

But there's a stark difference in education and intelligence here, and you don't present yourself as the sharpest of students. Erin Pizzey made the case that Feminist organisations do not wish to provide a gender-inclusive solution, as their funding relies on demonizing men. There would be so many examples, I could not keep your concentration if I were to go through them all. But one recent example is this: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-01/national-cabinet-meets-to-address-violence-against…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 02:23 PM
6

I see, so by definition you are being lazy. Bear in mind that grants are not always public, some information can be classified and you need to apply for freedom of information to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 01:35 PM
12

Feminism is now an Industry that exists to exist, sustaining on government grants and funding, private collections, and corporate subsidies.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 01:22 PM
1

Feminism is now by definition a business. Feminist organisations now receive substantial government funding and organise civil disobedience to further their funding. This is what we can probably call fifth generation feminism - the socio-political-capitalist complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 01:21 PM
3

Is a rise in DV a rise in DV against women only, or is their a rise in DV against men as well? Has there been a trend of rising DV violence, or has there been a anomalous year post covid. In counting deaths, has the court made convictions or is a presumption being used via self hosted websites? Is there a federal budget being drafted, and are people protesting and making noise using hyperbole, so to influence funding?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 01:15 PM
0

You must understand though, your decision to not pursue sexual gratification intimidates them. Because if you, a man, can do this, why couldn't they?!? If men are capable of valuing sex as important, how can it be justified for women to sexually treat men like shit? What excuse can be provided for acting promiscuously among men then seeking one man for monogamy, if it can't be said that all men are like this and they were just doing what everyone else did? The accountability siren is wailing in …
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:21 PM
9

You should write directly to parliament ministers about this. Make them feel embarrassed about this.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:15 PM
5

To explain it. What has been going on, and is in a feedback loop, is during budget drafting, organisations make a lot of noise and astroturf to get funding. So, for example, someone starts promoting a slogan "I feel safer meeting a bear in the woods...", to get funding. Young women then pick up on this and repeat it without realizing how batshit crazy it is, thinking there's a crowd of women in agreement. The press see it selling papers so they print it. It spins around the web and dies down unt…
/r/MensRights05/05/24 12:08 PM
2

Because they all have invariably fucked one. Narcissists play on people egos, it's pretty rare these days to meet a woman who is authentic and appreciates the role of their ego in how they fall for narcissists tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 07:59 AM
4

Women have Madonna-Whore complexes too.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 01:28 AM
14

Doesn't that mean they can't be deported?
/r/MensRights04/05/24 12:31 PM
0

Reckless disregard is the term they now use in rape trials. You cannot expect men to show reckless disregard.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:10 AM
1

Not the bears.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 07:13 PM
–

In the first time in 2000 Years, women can choose a Partner based on attraction and love only It's hard to tell because women have always kept that kind of stuff done before marriage a secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:00 AM
1

You grew up along Khao San Road?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 10:47 AM
2

If men are walking up and telling you that you owe them sex, then take down the sign saying "free blowjobs here"!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 10:33 AM
1

Translation: Muscles, money and frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 10:07 AM
-1

Reductionist explanation of homocide.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 10:00 AM
0

51% of guys? You make it sound like a $0 hooker.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 09:58 AM
1

Sure. In Australia, every year during the drafting of the federal budget, organisations organise loud protests over stuff like this - they call it "sexual coercion" - and tell men to "do better", but the elaborate false outrage is obviously just done to get funding because as soon as the budget is finished they wait until the following year. It's regular as clockwork and it's similar in most western countries, even Erin Pizzey discusses how it's done to get funding.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:21 AM
1

All this stuff is getting peddled by feminism organisations at around budget time, they astroturf it and women just mindlessly repeat it. But there's no true sense to it - it's just stuff to get more funding. If you'd like to know who they are - follow the money trail.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 03:16 AM
1

It's all about getting government funding.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:40 PM
1

I've never heard of it. How would this work? "By the 3rd date, confess your love to you and she will have sex with you". If anything they teach the opposite, that you can't negotiate desire, and to remain having frame. Let's be real here, it's more likely a narrative that feminists organisations push to get funding. Feminism is a billion dollar industry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:39 PM
0

I guess I feel sorry for you. You wrote yourself that you can't have healthy relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:47 PM
0

Then try staying in the one relationship, David Schnarch PhD used to say that relationships are people growing machines.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:44 PM
3

Just try not have a relationship for a while and see if that resets things. Otherwise, you sound pretty normal for a californian.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:23 PM
7

How about just giving up dick for awhile until you sort your shit out. You honestly think you'll ever be in a healthy relationship? With a husband or boyfriend who's okay with all of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 01:59 PM
5

But it says homocide, 69% male victims.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:44 PM
6

Most men don't even use social media like how women do, posting selfies, trying to get followers. But the whole "formal relationship" thing, women got rid of that, not men. That was 2nd wave feminism. But what women have done is replaced it with covert contracts, e.g. "if we have sex, you'll be my provider". A lot of the PUA guys say this - they don't lie, it's just that women start creating this world around them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 01:42 PM
4

It's about 30% women, 70% men.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 01:33 PM
1

The "bear in the woods" quote is about coming up with catchy slogans so to lobby the government for more funding for shelters, services...etc - it's an industry like defence contracts industry, it makes money from the government except that it uses public pressure to get a payrise.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:27 PM
2

The purpose of the "I feel safer encountering a bear in the forest than a man I didn't know" slogan is to get press so to lobby for more funding from the governments. It's not up for debate, because for them it's about being creative and getting paid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:22 PM
–

Do the courts order a DNA test? That's an interesting structure because it appears their only legal way to get confirmation of paternity if you are guy who's unsure.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:14 PM
4

Yes but that's the point. Women like keeping sex hidden, guys don't. Even Freud noticed this.. "Dating" isn't a word guys use, among themselves, they truly don't use it because it's embarrassing because it implies he's not yet fucking her. The only exception would be metrosexuals or guys talking to acquaintances.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:08 PM
9

That's Schrödinger's feminism. A women can have NSA sex and that's fine. And she can claim she loved him but just not forever and that's supposed to be fine and anyone who disputes it is being controlling and think women are their property. But she can also claim he promised a whole bunch of beta-provider stuff and he fooled her. And she can also explain that sex isn't love and libidos go up and down and women are sexually fluid and tell her newly wed husband she's just not into sex like she was…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:03 PM
14

But here's the thing - it's women who don't want that! A key indicator is language. Men plainly state their relationship status - yes we are fucking, yes she's my girlfriend and we are fucking, yes she's my wife and we are fucking....etc For women, they say "dating" - dating a guy can be anything from a FWB relationship to a foodie call. And for women, a boyfriend is someone you may or may not be fucking or may or may not be past that and a husband is someone you could be fucking 5 times a week …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:03 AM
6

Yep. Feminism is a billion dollar growing industry. Spread misinformation and hatred about men and ask the government for a handout.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:24 AM
10

The department said it's spending $2.3B on DV, of this almost $1B, $1500 of the $5k goes toward a cash payment, the rest goes towards "goods and services" and referrals - it looks like a whole bunch of new government contracts are coming out of this.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:14 AM
30

Just a further comment. Australia now has a billion dollar feminist industry. Think about it.... It's a billion dollar industry!!!
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:32 AM
48

Just to explain what is going on in Australia. You will have seen almost overnight, a lot of anti-male sentiment, claiming there's a national emergency for rising domestic violence - asking men to "step up" but providing a confusing message as to what this means. There's been speculation that it was triggered by the Bondi junction attack, however a simpler reason exists. The May budget is being drafted: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-13/treasurer-to-temper-great-budget-surplus-expectations/…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:10 AM
7

I WAS a park ranger....hmmm... So what happened? "Oh you know, it was low level work so I left it for the men to do...it was mostly men stuff anyway, dealing with wildlife"
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:38 PM
2

There should be laws and licensing to regulate heavy lifting. Ask him to go see a physio and collect information on any work related injuries for a future compensation claim.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:34 PM
15

If you work at a large company, be careful with how your employer is causing health issues. Male disposability is real in the corporate world. Again and again, I've seen that if an employer is causing health issues onto a man, nothing is done about it. Decades ago, I accidently mentioned a health issue at work and our female HR staff quickly got paperwork done about it, why? Because they had a guilty mind - they knew work was causing health issues and was an ongoing issue they had absolutely no …
/r/MensRights01/05/24 10:25 PM
1

That's only true for women who wait until 28 to find an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:36 AM
9

I think you are right. I'm not sure this will even be adequately written up in the Hansard, it's likely to be buried by the department and FOI requests will be necessary.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:23 AM
67

The irony is, you'll read in other forums of women claiming that society judges women more harshly then men when they drink too much. Clearly not.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 05:16 AM
1

Just another point. I read about publication of a figure of 28-35 female deaths allegedly caused by "gender violence" this year. But has the court system processed these killings? Or are they still awaiting trial? And will they be jury trials?
/r/MensRights30/04/24 11:38 PM
2

The Australian Prime Minister is now in hot water for being a bit too obvious about this. In an illustration of how consent works, he hijacked a rally to make a speech: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-01/albanese-gendered-violence-rally/103785858 This deserves more attention. He is playing with fire and got burned.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 10:31 PM
2

India will be next when it comes to demographic shift, but with worse consequences.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:41 PM
1

If it gets banned start writing to your local politician about it.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:25 PM
1

Wow, they actually say in the article, a history of false reporting will not be adduced. Is that even constitutional? Not failed cases, but intentional false reporting. How do they protect against vexatious behaviour? Foe example, there was a recent case in Australia where the judge threw out the case and publicly admonished the prosecution for filing it, and it turned out the woman had a history of doing it, but get this, the police managed to get pre-trial pleas from other men.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 09:11 PM
2

What you are perhaps asking is, does she have a drinking problem? Apparently women say they get judged for drinking, and that men don't. Yet the police and magistrates don't seem to follow that line, do they!
/r/MensRights29/04/24 10:53 PM
5

The term "objectified" derives from Freud's paper on "On the Universal Tendency to Debasement in The Sphere of Love". And as much as feminists hate and denounce Freud (particularly for his theory on penis envy), they find it useful for their narrative. Because it helps push this idea that female sexuality is superior to male sexuality, and so women cannot have the same sexual vices as men. That unrestraining female sexuality is good, and anything bad that happens in society of consequence of thi…
/r/MensRights29/04/24 09:37 PM
1

The thing about bail is, the court hasn't reached a verdict that the man was the offender.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 11:59 AM
-1

It's obvious dog whistling.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:50 AM
53

She's gendering "online attacks" so that things like "Are we dating the same guy?" will be ignored. But the irony is, Brittany Higgins, Lisa Wilkinson and Channel 10 were engaging in the exact kind of "online attacks" against Ms Senator Reynolds.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:35 AM
28

I think the majority of men are scared.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 10:39 PM
7

As another poster pointed out, what's this PM going to do about rising homelessness?
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:25 PM
8

That's right. There's a homelessness epidemic in Australia right now and it's DIRECTLY caused by the Prime Minister.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:16 PM
6

They are mad as cut snakes this year.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 07:26 PM
107

I was going to post something about this. WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON!?!? You can't open any Australian newspaper this weekend without getting lambasted with Gender hatred. And, immediately after the Lehrmann trial verdict, Channel Tens idiot barrister complains outside the courtroom about the courts verdict on qualified privilege, and immediately the media outlets are back into it about how they are going to continue naming and shaming people and screw up more criminal trials. And the Australia s…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 09:04 AM
3

And then you start wondering if the previous guy left due to her abuse.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:54 AM
1

There's a movie about dating from 1996 called "swingers", I recommend watching that.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:49 AM
4

Dating in your PhD only, as only dating other peers? Statistically, the girls in your peer group are more likely to remain single, meaning that if you widen your social circle, it will be easier for you. I'd go travel and broaden your horizons.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:38 AM
1

Yes. Everytime they break my trust, I tell them not to do it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:01 PM
0

For example, Women talk about how bad their partner is in the bedroom compared to previous partners. No consent is provided, it's obvious that a relationship rule is broken. But it's all forgiveable. This is the thing. Very flexible about these rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 01:09 AM
0

Is that before or after the fact? Because then by definition, there's nothing really wrong in relationships after the cheating happens. Yet we for reasons I can't get my head around, everyone holds this moral high ground about cheating being something that is unforgivable. Even though their own sexually promiscuous past and current lack of interest in sex is somehow always forgivable. That's the OPs point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 12:51 PM
0

Actor-Observer bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 12:45 PM
6

You really need to be careful about that though, they can claim it as sexual harassment. I mostly only hold the door open for other guys, or women with children.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 12:34 PM
3

What's the cause of increasing female violent offenders in Australia's prison system? Why it's men apparently, so lock up men without bail...just surreal logic: https://lens.monash.edu/@politics-society/2021/07/30/1383557/rethinking-female-incarceration-road-to-prison-paved-with-domestic-abuse
/r/MensRights26/04/24 12:21 PM
4

Women marry men who have resources to live longer, and divorce men who haven't. That homeless schizophrenic guy you saw on the street today? He's not going to live very long and doesn't go home to his wife and kids either.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:22 AM
2

The orgasm gap isn't a genuine cultural discussion about relationships . What is a genuine, is Gottman's research into the "four horsemen of the apocalypse" when it comes to relationships - criticism, contempt, stonewalling and defensiveness. The "orgasm gap" fits into this, as a misandric point of criticism and contempt toward men. But it's only written as a point of issue by journalists and bloggers to get readers outraged. But it's not something taken seriously, given the data on lesbian dead…
/r/MensRights25/04/24 05:13 AM
4

I read some surveys years ago, it showed pre-war, women highly preferred virgin men. I also note, there was a lot of noise during second wave feminism, that men had Madonna-Whore complexes and women internalise it. It's utterly insane how this has absolutely turned on it's head, with women having serious issues regarding sex and long term relationships.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 04:21 AM
7

It blows my mind that these women expect a man to marry them. There isn't a sex therapist of any value who sees having previous sex partners as providing any value to a relationship. As a group, they would coherently state it seems to cause a lot of marital stress, and issues in their therapy sessions. The Gottman institute lists Criticism, Contempt, Defensiveness, and Stonewalling as causes of marital breakdown. Having previous sex partners contributes to this - it doesn't create fondness abd a…
/r/MensRights24/04/24 08:43 PM
29

One thing I find really surprising, is feminist's writing articles about men having "yellow fever" - interviewing asian women and creating a narrative that men who date them have a fetish. It's extraordinary racism that just gets walked by because everyone is scared of them. E.g.: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-04-10/asian-fetish-dating-apps-racist-demeaning/100056602
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:06 AM
21

This is a good point in that: The noise that feminists make in corporations is essentially about "Why do we have to work with the low value guys?", as a group they are totally disinterested in workers rights. Whenever you see media coverage of men dying in workplace accidents, feminists will complain that there's too much media coverage about men, and attempt to redirect the narrative to domestic violence deaths.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 11:49 PM
4

So she, as a Jury would say, showed reckless disregard to your consent. And feminists claim (only) men are rapists.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 10:46 PM
2

Regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 06:53 AM
10

Yes, it should be viewed through that lens - it's obviously done to appeal to the female audience, as they are more likely to watch B grade RomComs whereas men switch it off.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 11:01 AM
6

We are told our whole lives that some men will fuck us but never ever date us. Aren't they they the guys you are "dating"?!? E.g. when a women is asked "whos that guy?" They will respond "oh that's just some guy I"m dating" - they never say, "oh that's some guy I'm fucking, but he doesn't want to date me". More to the point, women will go on dates yet say they aren't looking for a relationship? So what's missing here, the guy isn't feeding you properly?!? The incongruity regarding "dating" is ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:02 AM
3

How old are you though? TBH, men are at far greater risk of divorce then remaining unmarried.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 06:54 AM
1

Dating used to be part of courtship for monogamy, marriage and family. Now it seems to mean something else.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:59 AM
32

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:33 PM
95

The Tribunal were slightly perplexed by [Mr Legge's] philosophical belief being a non-feminist,' he said. 'It would appear to the Tribunal a feminist is simply about all genders having equal rights and opportunities as men. Who were the tribunal members?
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:25 PM
3

This has been pointed out numerous times, along with attempts to delete mens rights related articles, I avoid using Wikipedia it's a cesspool.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:18 PM
3

I think we are getting very close to the point in society where people who claim of a "patriarchy" are silently considered to be an unreasonable person.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:10 PM
2

The "gini coefficient" is much higher among men, then women. This means that the mean and median are more spaced apart in men, and more unequally distributed. Comparing averages, due to conservation laws, just illustrates a gender difference. Pulling apart the bodycount argument, you will find feminists project their bad sexual behaviour onto men and say "men do it" and otherwise state that men are trying to control them sexually. However you will also find that feminists will project the Madonn…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 11:58 PM
1

The context here is notions of "cheating" are a traditional/conservative value. But so are notions of saving sex for marriage. So it's all rather hypocritical.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:22 PM
3

Bit of a misnomer to say PPBs are just having fun. Most are looking for LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/24 02:16 PM
2

Traditional/Conservative. E.g. Roman Catholic.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:10 PM
2

"Natural birth" means home birth in many places. In hospitals they send the husband out if ill. Historically husbands weren't allowed to watch anyway. So it doesn't make sense otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:02 PM
0

Trust? By definition, sleeping around then claiming to want monogamy, that's not trustworthy behaviour. When people say "I have had better sex", or "he's sexually inexperienced "...etc, where's the trust? Being in an LTR where she has a low libido and a past, where's the trust? The response you'll get to these things is, "why are you so insecure"?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:00 PM
4

Home birth women are nuts though and would probably blame their husbands from the grave if they bled out during delivery.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:51 AM
1

If you sleep around while single, exactly what is your beef about cheating anyway? It's unlikely they are unrelated, and I believe that's the true reason why people go nuclear over it these days. Sex is something that should be cherished and special in a relationship?
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:41 AM
-6

What gets me is, the concept of cheating is a TradCon concept anyway. What's been pushed these days is, a youth of promiscuity should be rewarded with someone agreeing fidelity to you. It's bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:02 AM
1

Mona didn't "lose bid". They were taken to the minister due discrimination, it was taken to tribunal and they are ordered to stop it. The tribunal member noted the displays of intimidation toward the applicant and contempt of court in the ruling.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 10:03 PM
36

Because it makes them get bad feelings about how they treat men.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 10:59 PM
1

Worklessness isn't even a word. The word is, unemployment, and we know what that means - recession. The problem is, they redefined unemployment to mean "actively looking for work", so to "juke the stats" and are now paying for it.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 10:43 PM
3

I read that insurance and medical costs are a reason why couples break up in these situations.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 10:24 PM
9

There's something strange about this on reddit, it seems to be sexual - driven sexually. All these "MGCs" (mean girls clubs) form around the forums where men are vulnerable, and the girls just punch down and post pure hatred. Perhaps Freud was right about penis envy, it's very odd.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 09:51 PM
1

The entire concept of "incel" is screwed up though because women using it as a slur are affirming that it's okay in some circumstances for men to just use them for sex, pump and dump them.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 09:46 PM
1

Have you seen all the attacks made against the applicant, on the Reddit Australia forum. It's in defiance of Section 18 of the Tasmanian Anti-discrimination Act. Not to mention the defamation act. And reddit is liable.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 04:50 PM
3

Also in Australia: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-20/mona-ladies-lounge-legal-fight-men-excluded/103605236 And check out NYTimes take on it, they attack him, a true Claudette Colvin moment: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/20/world/australia/mona-ladies-lounge-tasmania.html You may need to open a private tab to read. And if you have a look at the Australia reddit, there are quite a lot of disconcerting comments made toward the applicant, which reddit should be taking down as it is in breach …
/r/MensRights21/03/24 04:40 PM
27

Wow! He's right, this is the worst yet because of how she makes threats of violence and names the gym.
/r/MensRights07/03/24 01:32 AM
9

I've seen this. They see you argue and rather than listen, take immediate opportunity to try secure a higher position to you in the sexual heirarchy through trying to form an allegance with the woman, by ganging up on you and not taking you on directly. Because he feels confident in doing this, even though it's cowardly. He's aiming for the outcome where he gets to attack you while you remain focused on the woman, then you leave defeated and he acts like he defeated you. Watch how Jordan Peterso…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 11:10 PM
1

Huh? Have you ever asked most women why it's an issue? Because the reasons maybe the same as these some guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 10:30 PM
1

They certainly seem to have time to look at their phones during dates. I think the thing is, they're getting their needs met so they don't post here. It's relationship oriented women who don't get their needs met in today's society.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 07:19 PM
2

Why is PPD full of low n-count unicorns?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:20 PM
1

Obviously the presumption is that you are a male whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:16 PM
19

Go woke go broke.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 12:49 PM
119

So right now, Reddit admins are looking pretty stupid. By the looks of the study, this site is more likely contributing to male suicide then anything.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 12:39 PM
38

:Sanchez, 29, declined repeated requests from The Washington Post for an interview, saying that speaking publicly about AWDTSG would set “a very bad example” for members. In posts to her groups in January, she said she plans to “aggressively fight” the Illinois man’s lawsuit “and show that these groups are mainly comprised of truthful warnings. So the founder wants to set up a system where they publicise information about individuals without their knowledge or comment and thus without qualified …
/r/MensRights03/03/24 01:20 AM
94

I actually think it's because western women are expecting to be able to use men as a consumable, and that society provide men to them as such. OLD was never a good deal, however they seem to be sort of trying to assert "consumer rights" as to what they should be getting from OLD.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 12:53 AM
1

I remember reading this story, there were some guys in a PC shop and this quiet nerdy asian girl kept coming in asking them to fix her laptop, and each time the laptop was virus infected, and the history had all this extreme porn sites she clicked on, so one of the guys asks her on a date and it didn't last long before she starts going mental at him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 11:49 AM
5

Is it a dead bedroom relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 11:46 AM
1

Purple-drank-line-dancing debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 11:32 AM
2

Wow this is big news: https://neurosciencenews.com/female-psychopathy-psychology-25669/
/r/MensRights02/03/24 11:19 AM
20

I tried posting this and Reddit wouldn't let me.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 11:10 AM
1

Also: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-01/sa-hemant-chadha-death-inquest-neighbour/103534866 Note that the blame is being made onto the male paramedic, and the Australian ABC are incredibly feminis, ordinarily the majority of pictures on their site being of women, and most editorials are about womens interests.
/r/MensRights01/03/24 09:56 PM
1

And you go around calling men incels do you?
/r/MensRights01/03/24 09:40 PM
0

Oh boy is this true? A goth alpha widow?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 08:39 PM
10

I've talked to actual incels back before their sub got shut down Huh? Have you tried TwoX. Infact, look at R/ Australia, right now there's a post on how Australian women are now doing more drugs and alcohol and they're all bitching about it being mens fault in one way or another, or that they used to have to hide their drug use and alcoholism because of men judging them. It's not just the Incel sub, its the whole fucking reddit website.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:33 PM
6

It seems to be a form of punching down done by people insecure about not being able to maintain a relationship beyond having sex a few times.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 07:16 PM
57

Feminism Rule #34: Maintain superiority through projecting your sexual vices and bad behaviour onto men. AND Feminism Rule #26: If you tell society it's men's fault enough times, they'll believe it. Trust me, it works.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 09:57 PM
1

That's not even the worst of it, check out the "Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013". There's unlimited redress, with employers maintaining blacklistings and no jurisdictional boundaries. An Indian male employee can be working in San Francisco for a job, and meet a Karen there, get in trouble and be totally blacklisted from all other employers. India's legal system is very bad mixture of conservativism, caste system, women are wonderful, and …
/r/MensRights25/02/24 06:33 AM
38

Oh, Australia is huge on this. On trains, buses and tram rides there's at least one Karen with her bag on a seat. If you sit next to them they'll take their bag, but act like you are being creepy and no guy wants that shit in Australia.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:47 AM
5

Some questions just answer themselves.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 05:40 AM
20

They are creepy. Imagine what will happen when their children see them in these online comments, if they're lucky enough to have children.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 08:30 PM
33

Not really because the BIG, BIG question men have to ask women these days is, are you monogamous - are you looking for a long term relationship? Or are you just fuuckung guys and screwing around. Because they act like men are the ones with a problem with monogamy, because they've grown up being told as such. But seriously look at this shit, these women aren't relationship material. So bid them good luck with life.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 08:28 PM
1

All I'm reading here is women ate finding Apps aren't working for them either. No surprises here, the Apps haven't solved the adverse selection / moral hazard issue, and most Apps are designed to keep them single and hooked.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 09:45 PM
3

I would say such a study hasn't controlled for cultural variations in this belief. And it wouldn't surprise me if the authors would then double down on this with exclamations that their culture is the superior culture.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 10:35 PM
2

High status men almost always choose women who can help them expand their networks and community. This is something that's been consistent all the way back to Roman households and even before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 12:19 PM
–

Well they obviously were the men who reproduced and thus were sexually successful so how do you square that circle, unless you don't truly believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:57 PM
–

shows a wild misunderstanding of comfort and consent For these women, guys are either for one or the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 03:33 PM
6

Do you know why? It's because they're being rewarded for it. There's no situation in Australia where it doesn't get you more. You a feminist? Here's a grant to piss up the wall, here's your college acceptance and grade mark-ups, here's your job interview, here's your pay rise, here's your court case win, here's your TV award, here's your book deal. Here's your murial in replace of Captain Cook.
/r/MensRights16/02/24 04:11 AM
3

How dare you reply like that. Assumptions are literally what you are seeking with your leading question.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 10:49 PM
1

They weren't complaining but providing an explanation that upsets you and so you are trying to control that. It happens to 304s.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:27 PM
0

Yes, but that is what the original comment was stating yet you found cause for complaint and described it as reaching, which has proven to be unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:20 PM
0

What I wrote has nothing to do with the criminality except that we are seeing these issues spill the court system in that these views of seeing men as consumption is creating a great deal of issues as to how to rule on consent, and so I suppose there are further furnished reasons to be cautious when dealing with such groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 05:13 PM
0

What makes a woman creepy? Having sex and then changing their story about it afterwards. Mildly, the woman will have a sob story about all her past partners. In the extreme, she's regularly down at the police station filing rape charges. In the ultra-extreme, she's being having sex with minors but argues in court that the children pursued it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 03:00 PM
1

Men are getting the wrong idea because we haven't appropriately critiqued the reality that behaviours of western consumption have spilled into the "dating" environment - that women proudly treat men as consumption and we are to celebrate this?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 02:52 PM
2

I suppose the point being made is, women being the largest consumer group in the world, now see men as consumption, and their narratives elucidate these values, and men can then consider this and vet out women unsuitable for a monogamous commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 02:46 PM
1

When that rash on your face isn't windburn.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 09:01 AM
1

The clitoral stimution question is very broad. It could imply asking if they needed get themselves aroused prior to penetration.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 08:55 AM
1

What's more chilling is, as I've experienced, a group of women will then cut-off the guy after one of their members does this. Moreover, they keep her secrets a secret, even when she starts another relationship with a new guy which they already know, and that was my experience on this too. I only realized they knew because their own boyfriends later confided to me that they all knew "she was crazy".
/r/MensRights13/02/24 10:05 PM
0

Prostitution, for example, is a consumable that most men don't participate in anymore. Because, women were complaining that it objectifies them.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 09:10 PM
13

That just means that the majority of men don't treat women as consumerables in the way that women treat men as consumerables.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:33 PM
2

And you agree that many more on IG are instathot wannabees.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 06:23 PM
9

A massive increase in women with Madonna-Whore complexes and sexless marriages.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 05:46 PM
46

Males are a consumable now.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 05:32 PM
2

They don't want to use the word "civilian", and in doing so are implying that the 8000+ men are fighting the Israeli's, which is in no way helping obtain a ceasefire. In this context, this is a grevious thing to do.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 05:23 PM
9

Agree. Given the gender ratios, I can't see how dating apps can get around the issue of adverse selection and moral hazard.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 12:32 AM
3

But you agree that there's instathots on instagram.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:24 AM
5

Instathots aren't red flags?!? Ask any guy about that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 10:54 PM
4

He's only concerned about YouTube. Guys use YouTube, girls use IG.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 10:19 PM
67

And again, another example of why men need to STFU when being interviewed by police.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 10:17 PM
3

This high profile case is an example of why men need to STFU when being interviewed by police. I'm reading comments on forums, applying a logic that "only 2% of sexual assault allegations lead to charges" and therefore "if you are charged you a probably guilty'... I mean, this is a high profile case and look what happened.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 09:38 PM
6

Never seems to stop the media before a jury trial.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 08:46 PM
4

Apparently Rollo Tomassi's Instagram account got banned, says they've been bulk banning. /u/Mrs_Drgree
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/24 01:20 AM
2

I actually want more female CEOs because I'm tired of seeing CEOs surround themselves with women like they're some kind of corporate hugh heffner, all the while proclaiming they're pro-women in the workplace. And they have zero control. I think the worst example of wokism I've seen, was an attractive girl who was well educated was being pushed into a team lead by HR and was refusing, so they promoted a guy but told him it was only a temporary assignment.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 11:49 PM
2

You know though, whenever they use the term "MRA" as a slur, deep down they know they're losing. Just ask them.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:35 PM
7

Huh? It looks like a glorified MLM scheme.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:31 PM
1

For example the editors probably didn't even try contact him for comment regarding some information but instead went straight to print to beat the competition. The guardian in particular, linked a lot of other circumstances to this case.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 04:27 AM
2

Because the editors would know they didn't have qualified privilege when they first publicised the case: https://www.forbessolicitors.co.uk/news/47774/defamation-publication-and-defence-of-privilege And so, any further articles will be an admission of this. But they also know that they rarely get taken to court over this and let's face it, they get savaged by a lettuce leaf by the courts.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 04:14 AM
22

Everything is a gender war. Until you ask them to stop making everything a gender war and the response you'll get is "Nobody is saying that only men do this", and similar double speak, and then they'll continue to make everything a gender issue and continue on their gender war. It seems to be scripted, it's strange.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 03:59 AM
2

Oh, it's definitely the reason. First thing you'll get here is "bisexual men can't give blood and that's a behavioural thing so it's not homophobia when women express homophobia". And then it's like, "but our vaginas get STDs because they aren't like penises". But these guys arseholes aren't like vaginas - that's the reason for HIV among gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 01:08 AM
0

Why is it women say their anatomy causes them to get STDs yet say bi-sexual men can't give blood because of HIV prevalence, and say how yucky that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 10:44 PM
1

Peace, you'd hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:51 PM
-2

Does this bullshit have anything to do with the propaganda surrounding the slaughter going on in Gaza? Everyone is hating on Muslims these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/24 12:47 PM
23

I kid you not, they consider themselves more educated to men and talk down at men, yet have no insight to the obviousness of this hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 08:31 AM
1

That may get deleted once the admins get onto it, due to defamation and vicarious liability.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 07:13 AM
4

This recently happened in Australia, and after the act, the woman wrote on a piece of paper a note reminding herself to convince him he was guilty before she proceeded to call him. She also alleged he followed her into the toilets when video evidence showed she followed him: https://www.theroar.com.au/2024/02/09/wallabies-star-beale-not-guilty-of-sexual-assault/ Again, the accused was named before conviction, the accusor remains anonymous.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:58 AM
2

The use of the term objectify derived from Freud's treatise in his paper "On the Universal tendency to debasement in the sphere of love", for which the term "Madonna-Whore complex" derived from. What historically happened was that 2nd wave feminism made loud noises that men had Madonna-Whore complexes, and objectified women, whereas in reality it was a projection of their own internal issues and sexual dichotomy toward men. It's notable that many women back then thought men were sleeping around …
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:19 AM
7

It will likely make even more important to STFU when being interviewed by police because the departments will get leaned on by the politicians offices to bend the law the way they want it to play out. And then they'll eventually retract the law when figures show women get charged.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 03:24 AM
–

This is made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 08:25 PM
0

Do they fling poo?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 12:42 PM
0

Look. Your standards are just too high if you don't date body builders. I mean, just what do you want from a guy?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 11:56 AM
2

Yeah, she was on her death bed surrounded by her grand children discussing that piece of ass, meanwhile in saving private ryan, grandads talking about the bunch of guys that died saving his ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:43 AM
1

Zuckerberg approves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:25 AM
1

We're talking about the future, not first year college.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:24 AM
3

You might have heard a story of a man whose dying wife's last request was to have sex with her ex. That was the plot to the movie "The Titanic".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:22 AM
1

Are you dating gorillas at the zoo?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:19 AM
8

The "they must have deserved it" logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:18 AM
2

The "they must have deserved it" argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 10:15 AM
3

Don't you think the "but they must have done something to deserve it" line is kinda a bit ironic when discussing IPV?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/24 09:39 AM
5

Notice the preoccupation of trying to create a "trial by media" solution, to sidestep procedural fairness? It appears the definition of "microaggressions" is behaviour that actually cannot be observed or measured by anyone, yet alone a tribunal or court.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 08:28 AM
10

He should gather perishable evidence and make contemporaneous notes. Information which can be used to cross-examine her and prove she is a unreliable witness in court. So things like, where and when they had sex, artefacts such as movie tickets, anything else corroborating his version of events. Immediately take down notes of the interactions, how knowledge of consent was obtained, evidence illustrating he did not act recklessly. It would also be good if such notes can be dated so to proove it w…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 11:03 PM
19

Substitute "male" or "masculine" with "attractive" to get your answer: - male privilege => attractiveness privilege. - toxic masculinity => toxic attractiveness. This helps clarify just how bad feminists are projecting their issues.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 10:24 PM
1

The alpha thing derived from the observation and evo psych theory of dual mating strategy. But it is misused and the bravado about sleeping around and considering this HVM is my biggest criticism. Because it doesn't incorporate the reality that women now have Madonna-Whore complexes and this is something men now should expect women to fix. For example, many of the observations of "alpha f_cks / beta bux" can be easily explained as Freud's observations on feminine Madonna-Whore complexes.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 08:19 PM
7

Take the red pill. I've got no better way of saying it. Gain awareness of how you can be manipulated in society, the two facedness of feminism, how it's impacting dating, sex, education and institutions, how all the complaints about men are just their own projections, that not all relationship problems are men's fault, that certain faculties in college give women better grades and let guys drop out, that the female HR manager at work thinks it's okay to coerce unpaid overtime because the shop fl…
/r/MensRights05/02/24 06:57 PM
2

It's "muscles, money and frame", dependability comes under frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 12:17 PM
5

Remember when Rollo Tomassi flipped the script during Dr Phil by explaining how mainstream women now view men as "superfluous", and Dr Phil spends the rest of the show trying to formulize an answer, and comes up with "Women shouldn't need men, they should want men", LOL.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 08:59 PM
16

They want to publicly name the accused before trial, and discuss it openly before forming a jury. A public response from the accused is "inappropriate", huh?
/r/MensRights04/02/24 08:47 PM
2

In the dead bedroom forums they're called "MGCs" - Mean Girls Club. They go around in gang and hate on men who post there, particularly stuff like this one. It seems to be a sexual thing - they get a kick out of it, sexually.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 08:02 PM
–

Passport Bros are winning. Western women are extinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 03:15 PM
1

Looking back. It's rather surprising that bullying wasn't realized to be a sexual strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 10:24 PM
3

Marriage Councillors know that it's the woman who stop going to the counselling, and whoever is at threat to stop going has the bargaining power during counselling.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 10:29 AM
7

1) The loneliness epidemic. 2) They give them attention and tell them they're special, which never happens to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 10:18 AM
1

This only comes about because "casual sex", "situationships", "FWBs" aren't classed as relationships and are thus more sexy. And it's the Madonna-Whore dichotomy, yet again, but it is represented in women, so there's no railing against the patriachy available, so they just dissing Freud or say it's old and thus conservative views and use that as avenue to rail against the patriarchy. I think relationships are still worth it, but be prepared to confront them and vet them about their views on sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 12:13 AM
1

But that would mean the rest were bad partners yet it was still fulfilling.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 10:41 PM
1

The gender difference there can be explained culturally as men needing to do the right thing, women needing to do what's right for themselves. In other cultures, men visit prostitutes before getting married.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 10:29 PM
1

At a point?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 09:17 PM
1

By seeing her as a complete human.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:40 PM
1

Not repressed, integrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:23 PM
1

By integrating love and lust. As freud wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:59 PM
3

Case in point, as my higher order functions developed, I learned from pleasure and pain. But if casual sex is nothing but pleasure, what's the reason for changing here?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 01:47 PM
3

I still see them partying. The only thing that truly causes people to change is the carrot and the stick. People have to go through pain before they change...abortions, STDs, being used, using people, loneliness, emptiness...etc
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 01:38 PM
2

People have casual sex because they like sex. People have casual sex because they like sex without the relationship component.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 01:32 PM
3

Because of the complete thoughtlessness of this. The lack of insight. It's not as if each is left to their own. If that were truly the case, we would be more open about n-counts. We'd also be more open about saying "I'm having sex with you because I hope this becomes a relationship". Or, the more honest answer "I'm having sex with you because I have a Madonna-Whore complex, you are the whore, and somewhere off in the distant future I'll get married to a woman who'll play the Madonna role"...some…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 01:21 PM
3

Casual sex is just sex that happens without a relationship. If that's possible the persons psychology, then what is occuring is the sex partner is debased, like the whore in the Madonna-Whore complex. For example, what of pregnancy? You would have legged it! Well, when majority of people have done something, it really can't be used as any indicator. It just indicates society hasn't really got it's head straight yet about sex. Moreover, over 30% of people cheat, a near majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 12:47 PM
4

But the definition of casual sex, is an agreement that there isn't a relationship. It's not an agreement that you are looking for a relationship. It's uncomprehensible to say that it was done to find a relationship. This is itself a dichotomy. Casual sex and cheating are features of the Madonna-Whore complex, they are not so distinct, and this is something that does hurt a partner. I can't understand why people are so uptight about cheating when they have a history of promiscuousness themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 12:31 PM
3

I just answered it. By definition, casual sex is sex without a relationship. Logically speaking, the casual sex didn't lead to a relationship. Unless they've made an error.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 06:29 AM
4

That's not an experience, it's an opinion. If a whore finds jesus, it doesn't mean prostitution is Christianity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:48 AM
3

But by definition, it didn't. An agreement to have sex without a relationship is exactly that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:40 AM
4

That's a straw man, cheating implies monogamy was at hand, casual sex doesn't necessarily imply a future monogamy. But stating casual sex is a requirement for monogamy is akin to stating cheating is a requirement. The only reason why casual sex was done in that situation, was to try out other people before monogamy. As if that's different to trying out other people during monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:20 AM
3

Casual sex is when your sex drive rules you. Monogamy is when you rule your sex drive. If done properly, sex can enrich a long term relationship. Nobody does that anymore, sex to them is about individualism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:06 AM
4

People don't miraculously change their ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 05:04 AM
5

That's bullshit. You had casual sex because you wanted to. You never needed to have casual sex to find monogamy. But you knew that. It's like saying "I cheated just to make sure my wife was still the best at sex for me out there".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 04:43 AM
1

I'm not against the red pill but John Gottman / Gottman Institute is the best answer. Except their book "What women want" is slightly red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 01:49 AM
–

LOL. Women aren't more wired for long-term bonding than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:24 PM
–

This is it. Men aren't following women and are going there own way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:21 PM
–

Men aren't moving to the right. Women are moving to the left and getting upset that men aren't following them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 10:18 PM
3

The were huge efforts to supresss the red pill movement. They slandered Warren Farrell, so Jordan Peterson showed up. They slandered Jordan Peterson, and MRA fighter Andrew Tate shows up. Rollo Tomassi himself chose his name to convey that he is prepared for this fight, and espouses that the red pill will always be in this situation. However, if you see things like "PsycHacks" on YouTube, it seems to me that red pill awareness as become rather mainstream. If you watch the original movie, it's ra…
/r/MensRights28/01/24 10:06 PM
0

There's a paper somewhere that shows that people with BPD, their symptoms imptove by itself in 10 years time. I think the high amount of antidepressant use in women these days is contributed by personality issues, whilst other women use tiktok and short term relationships on Tinder as therapy for BPD. The whole "ick" thing comes from the idealisation, devaluation, discard process they have with relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:51 PM
10

Externally, it presents itself aa ghosting along with some negging when friends ask whqt happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:47 PM
2

They haven't considered that if studies show that in a group setting, men get to talk more than women, that doesn't mean all men get to talk more than women. Indeed it's likely the same study shows a higher gini coefficient between men than woman in regards to the distribution of who gets to talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:56 PM
1

It's the Madonna-Whore complex. Ask them, if they were not attracted to promiscuous men, why did they find themselves curious enough to go home with one to experience it? They'll be like, "because I was naughty back then" (tee hee).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 09:23 AM
-4

if a woman talked anywhere between 30-50%, she was PERCEIVED to dominate the conversation. This is, yet again, the apex fallacy. There's two things overlooked here: a) Women want the alpha guy to do the entertaining and dominating! b) Guys lower on the social heirarchy would also be considered to be dominating the conversation if they talked 30%-50% of the time, particularly by women. Women provide "pity attention" to the other guys so they never notice this, but it's rather obvious to guys that…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:09 AM
-1

Exactly, this study contradicts it: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/women-talk-more-than-men/
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 08:06 AM
30

They aren't marketing to men. They are marketing to women, tapping into their intrasexual competitive behaviour.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 07:47 AM
1

Have a look at what's going on in the inside the head here. "Creepiness" is used to control men, remove men from spaces, to silence them, to remove them from society. To do all the things that feminists complain that the patriarchy do to them.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 04:24 AM
3

.. because women are creepy like that.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:31 AM
5

To genderflip and re-apply this logic... Feminists are creepy. Because they are unattractive and rather than talk to them, I want them to uninhabit my space and go away.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:25 AM
1

Men have Madonna-Whore complexes, and try to control women's sexuality, therefore women should break free of this by ticking off their sexual bucket list in a series of loveless relationships when young, get married to have children and give their future husband's a dead bedroom, because "Where such men love they have no desire and where they desire they cannot love".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:42 AM
1

Inless you are like breaking into their goon cave and find their crippling OF bill, this isn't a contradiction as much as a revenge fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:39 AM
12

Which gender initated more? Men initate atleast 3 times as much, so this research is bad. Yes, there's a lot of times that men don't approach women when the woman is open to having sex with him. That's because consent is not the only thing that makes it wrong or right for a guy to do that. And particularly these days, feminists have made so much noise, men are apprehensive about approaching women. None of this disproves that half the number of men as women reproduced in evolutionary history.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 05:25 AM
–

I think it's more of a case that women take advantage of kind men, because they can, society allows it, there's no penalties whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 11:05 PM
60

have fewer close friends than previous generations This is caused by feminist activism going after every male gathering and institution they can.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 09:38 PM
2

It's a projection. Feminism, in aggregate, has a developed Madonna-Whore complex and project this onto men. They objectify men, don't see them as sexual beings, and do everything they accuse men of. The adage, "men need to do the right thing, women need to do what's right for themselves" applies to feminist philosophy on sex. Have strong boundaries.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 08:47 PM
1

It indicates family status of a child. All the lower-class students at school come from non-married partnerships. All the upperclass are married. So, it's swinging back because of this rather traditional reason. A lot of women delay marriage until children now.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 06:45 AM
12

I do wonder if there is a gender difference in that women appear to not accurately report what they want in a mate but more accurately report what they don't want. Whereas men are visa-versa and seem to more accurately report what they want. So, if you went through the self reporting surveys, you'd likely not see that women, for example ask for 666's, but they will more commonly report when a guy doesn't match the 666's they are looking for, describing such things as a "red flag". Another exampl…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 06:36 AM
28

And feminists want a male curfew.
/r/MensRights25/01/24 08:41 AM
1

This is a really good question. There's been a lot of recent research on intrasexual competition regarding resource allocation, it's even a leading theory that women evolved hidden estrus because of this. I think we saw examples in the "barbie" movie of how women, whilst they pretend to stand together and fight the patriarchy, in reality they undermine each other in certain ways, e.g. slut shaming, simply because it reduces the amount of resources they can get for sex. So, in the case of your ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 09:11 AM
–

More Irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 05:33 AM
0

Turing completeness is really really dull.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:10 PM
1

Irony.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:04 PM
-4

Huh? You saying if we wear our "women are winderful" glasses, it wouldn't be depressing? Beg to differ on that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:40 AM
0

Sure but ai don't get why everyone gets so high and mighty about cheating when he who's without sin should cast the first stone - as in, everyone is guilty of it to some degree. I wonder if it's just the overtness of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:06 AM
-5

There's plenty of women who don't. A lot of women handbag their husbands these days, it's a gynocentric society, so it's unnoticed. They continue going to bars with their girlfriends, and invite themselves to anything men do because men congregating is a threat to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 03:56 AM
1

Again, depends. Adultery, if you read the bible, was an act only women could commit - men were instead charged with leading women into adultery. During that time, if a man had sex with an unmarried woman, he was expected to then marry her or pay the family the money. So, sex = marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 03:29 AM
1

If you intentionally compartmentalise sex partners as FWBs, ONS, boyfriend, husband material, I think that's a form of cheating. It creates a dishonesty in a relationship, where we tell our partners we love them and lust after them but really we don't, we compartmentalise them and are just using them for something that truly isn't monogamy, under the pretence of monogamy. Which is why everyone cheats in many ways, and everyone needs to work at monogamy and making amends and stop thinking monogam…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 03:24 AM
1

Some people say it's a social contract, even a contract with God(s). There's differing views. Some view sleeping around before marriage as infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 03:17 AM
0

Have a look at girls instagrams and tell me if you find a picture of their boyfriend/husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 03:15 AM
1

But pencil sharpeners become dull from use.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 11:27 PM
2

RP says the key that unlocks all locks is the master key, the lock that opens on any key is a useless lock.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 11:24 AM
1

High body counts are a good predictive factor of future infidelity FOR BOTH SEXES. I prefer men who are sexually reserved. If you can’t practice delayed gratification I don’t think I could trust you. That's not orthodox red pill, as in, that's not "fresh and fit" / "Rollo Tomassi" red pill. It's the only thing I disagree with them about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 10:33 AM
5

Using feminism as a weapon to destabilise other countries.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:06 PM
3

The judge should award costs against CPS.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 07:59 AM
2

I don't know where to begin, you wrote strawmans, minimize and devaluated... When are we going to see women take accountability for stuff like this? Huh? You are as bad as all the things you complain that men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 01:55 AM
5

Yes. It's in context to the ~1970s assertion that men only have this, which was the thesis of the above referenced book (the female eunuch). It was my first Red-Pill moment finding this book on girls desks at College and being lectured by them that men (only) have Madonna-Whore complexes, whilst some pretty wild stuff used to go on amongst the way some of the girls treated guys, and it was whitewashed and just basically disbelieved.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 01:38 AM
1

The whole Chad thing has come about from the surge in women's own Madonna-Whore complex, post sexual revolution. So, yes, he kind of does have to play her fantasy, and that fantasy is that he's confident and cool, popular with other women and sexually experienced, yet cold and distant and emotionally unavailable. But he truly is emotionally unavailable. He doesn't espouse love. Any hint of that means he's weak, emotional and vulnerable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:47 PM
1

We definitely see it coming from Feminist's children. We even see it in Feminists themselves. Freud discussed that it appears in women where they require an element of "prohibition" for lust to occur - that's a very common theme among women these days. Feminism has created a mount of "prohibition" ideas - e.g. they bang on about rape culture and how men are making them too scared to walk down the street while internally having rape fantasies and reading about vampires and rich men who stalk them…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:32 PM
2

Yeah, so Freud wrote it was a parenting / family of origin issue. I'm saying as much as it can derive from religion, it can derive from feminism, particularly given the rise in single parenting these days. Nothing made up there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:11 PM
1

Because Chad doesn't need to do that. Not in a stereotypical sense. Typically women sleep with Chad within 3 dates. But it's rather incomprehensible that he would confess love during that period. It is true that guys who get more sex are guys that feel entitled to do such things and research shows rapist are rarely incels but guys who usually get what they want from women, but that's not "Chad" in a stereotypical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:06 PM
2

Most discussions blaming religious institutions involve some element of fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:57 PM
3

Here we go...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:53 PM
2

But it's not a fair generalization. Women these days are literally saying "I had sex with a hot guy, he didn't want to marry me, so all you other fuglies must be worse".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:48 PM
1

They're either beaten into submission or at the divorce rape shelter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:39 PM
6

Who knows. It's a sample of one - "the hottest girl I know is a slut".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:35 PM
1

But maybe he's a realist. It's women who mostly lose interest in sex in LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:17 PM
1

No that's not it. Freud described it more as a feeling of incest you get when you move in together and your libidos drop.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:12 PM
-1

One does not simply wife it. You need to be getting a pay packet that can be split up between people, for a start.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:10 PM
3

Dream on. Average Joe doesn't pull hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:07 PM
3

Dream on. The average guy doesn't nearly get enough STRs to compartmentalize.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:06 PM
3

The OP isn't describing Freud's paper on Debasement in the sphere of love. Average guys don't nearly get enough hookups for this to be a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:05 PM
1

This isn't even Freud. It's some shit women made up to justify a 304 youth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:03 PM
5

And probably has a hidden personality disorder. We've all had the BPD girlfriend, or histronic personality hookup that ghosted us, they get around.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:00 PM
1

Physical attractiveness is associated with BPD and histrionic personality disorder. These folks change partners like it's a new outfit. So you are always going to get your sex positive Amber Heards DTF then ghosting you or scratching your car.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:55 PM
10

Exactly. Today it's women who also have the Madonna-Whore complex. Edit: also
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:50 PM
-1

That's not necessarily a religious problem. It's now more of a gynocentric problem. Boys now grow up with their mother being the dominant parent, telling them their sexuality is bad, that they are rapists. They become teenage incels and later are betas in waiting who marry post carousel women and have a dead bedroom. However technically, it's the woman here who fits the Madonna-Whore complex criteria because she's an alpha widow.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:49 PM
1

There's certainly a difference. Women get infatuated with Chad. Chad just exists. They go up, stand next to him, talk to him, take him home and have sex with him. He exhibits no indication of loving them whatever, but women believe they can change that. Whereas with BPD, the woman gets infatuated with a beta guy and he's like "Wow, somebody loves me - see world, I'm not a nobody!".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:21 PM
2

Because they do all the things that a woman does when she considers a guy is HVM. This is the best answer. They mimic how women act when they are with the most HVM they've met. They literally tell him this. Then ofcourse they go through the idolize, devalue, discard stages. And their brains reboot, erase all their memories and they ghost the guy and start again. During the reboot stage, her brain can momentarily fry itself and she has a psychotic rage and breaks his windows, totals his car, send…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 04:40 AM
3

In short, women are creating a much more sympathic narrative of why they cheated and gas lighting people on the fact that they broke their exclusivity promise and cheated. But, interestingly how does it come about that the survey questions enter into the woman's narrative, whilst stopping any further enquiry with the men, other than him saying "she was hot". If we to generalize, we could ask the leading question, "Did you cheat on him because the other guy was available?" And then we get to an a…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 11:57 PM
16

That would have to be extraordinarily common. I've experienced that. Wife drops out of therapy and blames the therapist.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 11:50 PM
30

Casual misandry.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 11:40 PM
0

Men aren't looking to wife 304"s.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/24 08:16 PM
4

What this particular situation is, is policy failure due to ideological bias.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:17 AM
1

I don't understand what you are asking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 10:13 PM
15

Why is everything reshaped as men's choice - "Increasing number of men choosing not to work than women"..."more men fall victim to violence than women"...
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:26 PM
2

Huh? You are married and they infer you are an incel? What does that say about the state of marriage these days.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 08:20 PM
1

You didn't answer the question. Personally, I have never heard of women asking a guy if he's married and stating their preferences. The vast majority of the time, the women just presume it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 07:37 PM
1

How do you arrive to the conclusion that the man must have lied? Before having sex, did she point blank ask him if he was married? Did she say she was single, looking for marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 07:19 PM
1

Do they even ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 07:10 PM
2

The way married men approach them and date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 07:05 PM
5

How is cheating a preference? Huh? The thing is, before having sex women don't even ask if his married.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 07:04 PM
3

The woman's true preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 07:02 PM
1

Let's be honest here. It's only a problem if she sleeps with him, not if she just dates him. So how does it come about that she ends up sleeping with men who are married?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 07:00 PM
5

There's countless research indicating this. Just off the top of my head... Research showing women mis-count their number of sex partners. Research showing women regret their number of sex partners. Research showing women are attracted to dark triad traits. ...etc The evidence is there.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:53 PM
0

That makes sense, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:43 PM
0

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:33 PM
3

By that logic, when women complain about married men on Tinder, isn't that a preference thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:25 PM
2

:Also, where does housework factor into dating? Not where but when. Postwall usually.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:23 PM
9

TLDR= I don't like what I perceive women's choices of a sexual partner to be. Women don't like their own choices in sexual partners and apparently that's the fault of men who never had sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:22 PM
1

Well, how does a woman flip through all the options and end up sleeping with a married man before finding out? The thing is, women lie about sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 06:09 PM
1

That's not disagreeing that women and men commit filicide approximately equally. It's actually not saying anything. Fathers are significantly more likely to kill teenagers - particularly not their own bloodline, mothers are significantly more likely to kill young children.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 08:25 AM
2

Giddy, giddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 04:24 AM
1

Rather than asking if you are married, you should need to submit the id's of those you are having sex with. Imagine that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 04:24 AM
1

How is it defamation if the information is true? Just a general comment about this. It can fail a defense against defamation if it was done instead of following up the matter through the criminal courts or by attempting to pervert it, e.g. by trying to publicize a guilty verdict so to swing a jury, and this can cause a mis-trial and the guilty party can get off. This is a big problem with MeToo.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 04:19 AM
2

Internally rigorous....hmm...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 04:10 AM
-3

Yes. Monogamy is dead. What's commonly been done instead is, promiscuity while young (hoe phase) then settle down and control someone sexually ..and when you control someone like that, they're not as exciting as the uncontrolled sex partners of youth...assert your right regarding consent, and repress them, use sex to control them further... Well if you ain't fucking your husband someone else will consent to that shit so.... consent is the only thing that matters. Right? Desire makes everything b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 02:05 AM
1

So women kill other children and poison them. Whoopdedo. You ask for sources, we provide it, you try throwing shade...etc Just suck it up princess.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 01:55 AM
35

It's all about consent, you see.
/r/MensRights16/01/24 12:02 AM
1

The Canadian source even states fillicide is traditionally seen as a maternal issue however men might even do it as much as almost 50%. None of the sources disagree that men and women do it in equal numbers. Only that women more often kill younger children. You're not even reading your own sources and throwing it out You need to calm down. LOL. Stop being arrogant. LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 11:59 PM
1

Of course you haven't heard it before. Feminists don't want that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 10:09 PM
0

But then that means men financially bear the brunt of childcare, in aggregate.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 10:08 PM
1

Are all children 16-18 years old? Is that even filicide? An 18 year old? God help us.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 10:05 PM
14

It's not a reverse Madonna-Whore complex, it is the Madonna-Whore complex. Freud did write in his notes on a corollary in women: Freud finds a corollary in female frigidity, originating in what he sees as women’s inability “to undo the connection between sensual activity and the prohibition” (p.186). “This is the origin”, he tells us, “of the endeavour made by many women to keep even legitimate relations secret for a while; and of the capacity of other women for normal sensation as soon as the c…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:21 PM
0

It's inconceivable bullshit. They didn't even google it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 08:18 PM
0

That's bullshit and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 12:46 PM
1

It's Mate guarding, intrasexual competition. The Women see's it as stealing things back from his future partner, in retribution for her taking him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 06:44 AM
1

Seems Tyler Durden was way ahead of his time.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 06:41 AM
2

Men and women kill children in equal numbers which is why filicide is not something feminists touch upon, particularly when discussing domestic violence. Edit: here: It states: > It is recognized that at least half of filicidal acts are committed by fathers And discussed here And here. And as referenced in Wikipedia: A 1999 U.S. Department of Justice study concluded that mothers were responsible for a higher share of children killed during infancy between 1976 and 1997 in the United States, whil…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 04:17 AM
2

But surveys show, one of the biggest complaints women have, is men lie to get sex. In this setting, there is no lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 09:29 PM
3

What if we made the man to be more female, would that make you more comfortable? Society is working on this!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 09:27 PM
9

You saying he knew she was trying to baby trap him? I don't think he did.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 07:54 AM
1

This should help you, at the end it discusses women's Madonna-Whore complex: https://www.lacanonline.com/2010/05/reading-on-the-universal-tendency-to-debasement-in-the-sphere-of-love/ In short, it's feminist revisionists who say the Madonna-Whore complex is for men only, done because it then makes womens sexuality appear superior, and this is the feminist untruth.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:52 PM
2

As discussed, you should be in a union and have had your union rep there as witness. At least, you should have taken notes and emailed them after the meeting, highlighting the vagueness. It is otherwise pointless going to such meetings for yourself, you are just playing into their hands. Be prepared for people to change their stories down the track. For example, you may receive a second warning regarding something else utterly unrelated, and the recollections during these recent meetings will ch…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 08:55 AM
0

But by all accords, she's been telling everyone, no?
/r/MensRights12/01/24 08:48 AM
1

She is herself weak though, she's a very weak person. There are better ways to deal with childhood trauma than this.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 11:28 PM
2

Are there any legitimate studies on this? Research may find that not all women find this common, but that a particular type of woman finds this consistent, just saying....
/r/MensRights11/01/24 11:23 PM
2

Say something to the effect that someone already told you. What's bad, is women who's seriousness of their relationships depend on the guy they're talking to. Mentioning that guys are discussing if they are in relationships really sends them into a spin.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:51 PM
2

The felicia treatment.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 09:51 PM
0

Well duh, that's only in one section of "On the Universal Tendency to Debasement in the Sphere of Love". I cited another section, it's directly from Freud. He wrote it. You are deflecting.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 09:36 PM
0

It's not a male only problem. Freud never writes that it was a male only problem. It's just that later feminist authors intentionally mis-construed Freud's works as such, as it then created an argument of female superiority regarding sex. These authors also paradoxically denounced Freud. Anyway. If you read it, Freud actually describes it as a women's inability to "“to undo the connection between sensual activity and the prohibition". He describes this phenomenon perfectly in women.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:21 AM
14

I this might be the study: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976231211267 More info: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-asymmetric-brain/202312/8-new-scientific-insights-on-love-and-how-it-fades-away I don't see a reference to correlation with loss of love against housework in the study, it's likely an addition made by the reporter, and the reason why they didn't cite the study.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 10:11 PM
1

I think this is it: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976231211267
/r/MensRights10/01/24 10:10 PM
8

It's feminist sexual protection. Women objectify men and claim men are all bad at sex for not performing during an ONS because the guys brain is screaming "DON'T STICK YOUR DICK IN CRAZY!" Which is a normal thing for a guy to do these days.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 05:31 PM
18

Yep, classic Madonna-Whore complex in women.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 04:58 PM
7

Rule #0, these Women have Madonna-Whore complexes. It's not a "sex positive sub", that's total bullshit, as we can see here posts about male performance are ridiculed, objectifying men is the norm in that sub.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 04:56 PM
51

Awhile ago, some one posted on that forum the question if they felt more freedom having sex in a relationship or with a hook-up. The majority of them answered that they felt more freedom with a hook-up because they could do things (i.e. deprave themselves) and not worry about what the guy thinks about them. Needless to say, they all kinds of screwed up.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 11:24 AM
7

For this woman, the police actually managed to coerce guys enter into pleas and I have seen this as then used as argument that something was going on when the guys probably got bad legal advice. Some Australian states have made it legal to publish rape allegations before trial, so the police do have leverage to coerce a pleas in Australia. What was happening is she was getting blackout drunk and making booty calls and then later filing for rape. She alleges that she told the guys she gets drunk …
/r/MensRights09/01/24 11:53 PM
–

They're lying. They weren't interested in you. The fact that you went on a date is interest enough. If they thought you were a 10/10 but weren't interested in them, they would chase you for another opportunity. There's a rational male quote relevant to this, about how women will crawl through broken glass for a certain guy - it's very true. Just focus on muscles, money and game and don't double down if they signal disinterest.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 07:09 AM
1

Maybe it's the women who are weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:17 PM
1

That implies that there's something exhibitionistic going on with these women, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:16 PM
1

They literally try to be offensive as possible, to everyone. And if you are stupid enough to be their white night, you'll be king hit and left with life changing injuries.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 11:13 PM
6

That seems to ge a gender difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:55 AM
1

Uh okay that's not creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:54 AM
3

Honestly, in a country like the UK men avoid these women in public if they can, they are bad news, they cause fights and shit. Seen them cause a guy to get punched out cold and the ambulance arrive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:17 AM
1

Because the women will use antisocial behaviour, like violence, to gain retribution? I'm not getting your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:10 AM
1

If a gym allows filming as a business they can be vicariously liable, which is why they have such strict policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:09 AM
1

What is the implication? It's not clear at all. This presents something of a guilty conscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:07 AM
1

If all you do is you record a guy, how does the world know you think he's being creepy toward you?!? You'd have to add it. So that's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:05 AM
1

It's not illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:02 AM
1

Creepy isn't the word though. He's doing it to shame them. Women do similar things. There's issues by your own moral logic in calling it "creepy". That's not to say there aren't issues with what he could be doing
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:01 AM
1

There's a lot of weird women filming and posting photos of guys on Facebook and Tiktok then.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:57 AM
8

It's the first one. Recent studies are showing that misogynistic men do better with young women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:51 AM
0

Is twoX a true representation of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:48 AM
1

Inuits have 50 words for snow. A special kind of woman has 50 insults for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:47 AM
6

"Undesirable man" is an external attribute, "incel" is internal attribute. Women like to think that if they avoid incels they will avoid undesirable men, this is incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:45 AM
8

That's rather naive. There's a whole world of undesirable men who aren't incels. That's the OPs point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:30 AM
12

You'd have also noticed that in the middle of the Leongatha mushroom poisoning news frenzy (woman attempted to murder ex-husband but poisoned numerous others), ABC started pulling out some old cases of women getting killed in DV incidents by men, stuff from 20 years ago.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 10:11 AM
8

The true irony of that book though, is that it was just a projection of women's own Madonna-Whore complex. For example, it's underlying thesis is that women should tick off their sexual bucket-list before marriage (and then subsequently make their future husbands the "Madonna" in their dichotomy) because allegedly that is men did in the 1970s... ...and then the surveys came out in the 1990s that showed only 5% of guys do this, and embarrassingly what had been occurring is these women were all "d…
/r/MensRights05/01/24 07:04 PM
4

Misandry definitely kills children: A 1999 U.S. Department of Justice study concluded that mothers were responsible for a higher share of children killed during infancy between 1976 and 1997 in the United States... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filicide Now go watch as they feminist SJWs now go update that wiki, to keep Wikipedia biased.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 06:06 PM
5

The irony about Incels is, in the 1970s, feminists were buying up this book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Female_Eunuch
/r/MensRights05/01/24 05:42 PM
4

I’m a musician. I had this conversation after a gig once with a girl I kinda fancied: “You’re such a handsome boy. You should lose that ugly beard” “But I like it” “Yeah but women don’t” “You’re not women, you’re A woman” “Yeah but trust me, no woman likes your beard” “First of all, I don’t care. Secondly, my fiancé doesn’t mind” “She does, trust me”. Just tell her that you don't consent to the conversation. Consent is the No #1 rule these days, so guys should use the word more often.
/r/MensRights05/01/24 05:31 PM
15

Some people asked why in the comments and I’m paraphrasing she said they were notified of an open investigation about me and although there is little details that they had they decided to 86 me to protect their other guests. So they decided not to tell you this? Blows my mind that we are seeing more and more of this issue of vigilantism trying to deny natural justice and undermine the court systems because they aren't getting outcomes they want. You probably have a defamation case against them.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 04:19 PM
3

So, 2nd wave feminism was pushing very hard in the 1970s to remove marriage from society, labelling it as way the partriachy asserts property rights over women and tries to control womens sexuality. But it never took, because this is the one thing that women don't trust other women over. In reality it never took because women, as they get older, want to assert a property right over a guy, because they don't trust other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/24 02:10 AM
1

This is a good example of early "luxury beliefs". Back then, women indicating beliefs that men don't provide them any advantage would indicate a woman who was already well off.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 05:53 PM
0

I think this is why the institute of marriage still exists. Women would have torn it down in the 1970s if it weren't for the fact that they want to put rings on guys because they dont trust other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 05:48 PM
1

The biggest place is all three, a bar or a club on a beach. It's not just I was travelling but that they were travelling too.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/24 05:45 PM
2

Except this isn't true. I got approached heaps when travelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/24 09:10 PM
4

It's not humble bragging because it's very material to the point I'm making. Feminists are saying that if you close the orgasm gap, women will want sex as much as men. It's not only untrue, but the DB forums are full of men who thought that if they found a woman who they can give orgasms, they won't have a dead bedroom.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 11:56 PM
5

When we have sex my wife has at least 2-3 orgasms, doesn't mean she's more interested in sex than me, and there's no scientific study that says that she should be becoming a high libido because of this. The closest study has been Rosemary Basson's study on responsive desire. There's heaps of guys in the DB forum who have partners who orgasm more than them during sex. The orgasm gap is fundamentally a harmful theory.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 11:00 PM
5

When reporting it to the police, be sure to follow through with it and dont change your story or do things like delete data off your phone. The police will ask to gather all perishable evidence so do that. Write down notes right now. Also go see a doctor and tell them.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 09:18 PM
6

Congratulations Erin Prizzy, she was way ahead of her time. All the data now backs her up about reciprocated violence and the world will be a better place because of her.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 09:04 PM
3

It depends on jurisdiction. In canada a young kid was found guilty of sexual assault because they were both drunk on a beach and underage and she was reported to be incoherent by other witnesses however he maintained that she asked him to have sex, his drunken situation wasn't appropriately considered in light of mens rea: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/scc-youth-sexual-assault-1.6017773
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 09:32 AM
17

women are reduced to their body count But women aren't being reduced to their bodycount, the genuine concern is, are such people telling the truth when they say they want monogamy because it's more than likely they will experience troubles maintaining a relationship and the research backs this up.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 09:03 AM
6

how did we go from “19 year olds shouldn’t be dating fully established adults at 27” to “lol young women sleep around” - cause they’re totally the same issue, right? What else are you expecting them to do?!? The leap in logic is this idea of "fully established adults". They are either children or not, so what are they? Can we use the same argument for college? That women shouldn't go to college because their brains haven't completely matured?!? The other leap in logic is this idea that the 27 ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 05:03 AM
9

Well, if we are going to treat women as children we should make them seek parental consent (i.e. from their fathers) before writing them a prescription for contraception pills. Because, the thing is, it's relationships that help you grow up and learn these things. Being single and sleeping around until your mid to late 20s doesn't make women grow up and we have a whole generation that is proving this point by treating men like garbage while being perennial victims of everything, including their …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 02:57 AM
2

What's a "late bloomer" though in anycase? N-count at it's core is a measure of failure. A "late bloomer" would do better to read books about relationships. Now, should a guy who's 27 date a 19 year old? Sure! Because when she's 51 and menopausal he will be almost 60 and will be far more happier about the drop off in sex. So the relationship is likely to be far more successful when it comes to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 01:31 AM
2

But it's women who don't see men as valid people, they compartmentalise men as FWBs or husband material, good at sex, bad at sex, big penis, small penis, they dehumanize him for not getting an instant erection for them...etc When it comes to sex, women treat men like shit.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:33 AM
2

You mean to say that a history of being promiscuous because I wanted to be doesn't indicate a lasting successful monogamous relationship in which I don't become bored with having sex with the same person and lose interest in sex altogether? What if I wear white at the wedding, will that change your mind? Women's brains don't fully develop until their mid twenties, haven't you heard? But we aren't children, don't call us children!!! You want us to be a "female eunuch" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wi…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 09:18 PM
–

Because adrenaline is protective (fight/flight) it can be comforting to some people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 10:50 AM
2

It's "Trust me bro" OP, it's here: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02717-0
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 04:22 AM
3

A sample of 1124 heterosexual British men completed an online survey consisting of a modified CDC National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, and measures of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and conformity to masculine norms. In the present sample, 71% of men experienced some form of sexual victimization by a woman at least once during their lifetime https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02717-0
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 04:18 AM
3

Pre-selection definitely effects men but in the opposite way. Everybody knows this, which is why when women have a school yard cat fight, they call each other whores and sluts...etc because they know this strikes them out of the possibility of having a relationship with the alpha guys (as opposed to just sex), and it's also the reason why women slip off and secretly have sex with guys when away from home, e.g. at a holiday resort or when backpacking...etc It's essentially the reason why OLD is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 03:54 AM
2

You think that's a gender issue? Plenty of women today are abusive as fuck. A recent report showed 70% of men have received some kind of sexually motivated abuse from women. It's jist that zero shits are given when it happens. It's like, dog bites man isn't news, but man bites dog is news.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:12 AM
3

It's possible that it gets misdiagnosed as an anger disorder in men and that histronic personality disorder is under diagnosed and gets misdiagnosed as borderline personality disorder in women. Histrionic personality disorder is curiously mostly women only.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 12:39 AM
3

If child support is prosecuted through the criminal system, is the test of evidence "beyond reasonable doubt" or "in the balance of probabilities" - as is the case in civil jurisdictions? Seems to me, this creates a situation where men should treat the woman as he should the police and adhere to strict boundaries and non-disclosure, to ensure he is prepared for proper representation in the criminal system? This certainly leads to "enforcement not involvement".
/r/MensRights28/12/23 09:16 PM
9

An interesting survey would be, has a woman ever tried to coerce you into buying drugs for her? Fo example, I went out with a woman who told me "I want you to do a line of coke on my tummy and fuck me from behind..." Ofcourse I never did get that baggie of coke she was looking for so she blocked me. I'm certain that this is a common experience.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 09:05 PM
-1

Mods, can posts like this be tagged with "adverse action"? As I'm seeing more and more of this in the workplace - adverse action based only on gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 08:10 PM
10

Unironically, the mods or admins removed it.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 08:08 PM
1

You should definitely join a union and make certain to understand local employment legislation and case law well, particularly in regards to sex discrimination and adverse action. I would read the legislation yourself and look at recent similar cases of adverse action. Meanwhile, take contemporaneous notes and avoid anything which could be construed as admission, e.g. don't sign anything, if asked why you did it, simply take notes of that meeting and send them a copy of their enquiry. Keep notes…
/r/MensRights28/12/23 07:29 PM
2

It's Schrödinger's feminism: a situation is simultaneously casual and courtship until something observable from the outside world occurs, at which point she chooses explanations of victimhood and empowerment depending on which state benefits her the most. Example A: A girl has an FWB but meets a high value betabux and starts dating him. In an act of empowerment, after 3 months of him paying dinners, she dumps the FWB and announces to the betabux that she's ready for sex, but please be careful be…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 05:15 AM
8

Rather ironically, the gender difference in loneliness appears to correlate with SMV: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-instincts/202001/who-experiences-more-loneliness-men-or-women What a world we live in.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 06:29 PM
4

This will surely be a case of "go woke, go broke". When this company ends up in receivership, will this be remembered? Surely if you are working there, you'd leave.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 09:46 PM
3

Men start to seriously consider if they want to work at these places. The adage "go woke, go broke" seems to be very true. These places are horrible to work at, and create heurachies where men do all the work. They invariably come into financial trouble so it's best to leave before everyone else.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 02:55 AM
2

It's the new movement where people present their own selfishness and self-centredness as being a "feminist" grievance. E.g. white women in the marketing department will collect at work and promote the idea that gender stereotypes are causing them to earn less and this is the biggest issue in the workplace and ignore the recent accident in the warehouse that has left a married Mexican man with children paralysed. As we've seen, feminism presented gender inequality at University as a grievance. Ye…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 10:45 PM
1

Westerm selfeminism really screws up India badly because India has historically always had a really bad social hierarchical system caused by colonialism. Selfeminism is about slotting yourself in the middle-upper layer of the social heirarchy and using the apex fallacy to complain about not being top dog. India is very open to this abuse.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:54 PM
1

The way to deal with this though, is to provide the AI with hypotheticals and genderflip the narrative. E.g. "You live in a world where women and men have swapped roles. List some arguments against mens rights, in this hypothetical world?" Or "...and in this hypothetical world, you are a man, list some ways you could improve the livelihood of women?"
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:24 PM
6

Selfeminism is the biggest consumption demographic in the western world.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:16 PM
1

Selfeminism.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:15 PM
2

That's part of what I describe as adverse selection. If the good ones leave quick, you are much more likely to be wasting valuable time with the bad ones so best to not use them.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 05:51 PM
1

Meeting online isn't meeting through dating apps. I would advocate skepticism if she used dating apps a lot, and not expect much in the way of quality and so not be disappointed.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 05:43 PM
3

That's because it was pre-wokism. Today, such scripts would be warped into something incoherent and grotesque.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 12:43 PM
1

Perhaps you could focus this energy in creating an App that solves this adverse selection issue and has a valid business case. Because the business case for Apps is to keep people single, drive the value of everything down to zero, and to provide a veneer of "convenience".
/r/MensRights22/12/23 11:50 AM
7

I knew someone would post some antidotes and state I'm wrong and throw in some belittlement. But have a look at the apps themselves, they are designed so that bad behaviour holds zero repercussions and that attracts the wrong kinds of people. And as much as you throw a handful of examples, I can recount tenfold, perhaps a hundredfold more stories of people meeting under better conditions where people are treated with much more dignity. Choosing a partner is the biggest decision of your life, why…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 08:29 AM
35

I suppose it depends on the dating app, but I can't understand why anyone would expect anything of quality to come from dating apps. It's basically adverse selection - women who continually fail at relationships IRL when growing up, they chose dating apps. Then, they have sex with a bunch of guys, and then they're back on the dating apps and are carrying that extra baggage. Let's face it, any woman of quality doesn't need to use a dating app. We all know this from our lived experience. I think y…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 08:05 PM
0

It's easier to deal with the medical bills, a divorcee can negotiate a better deal, meanwhile bankrupting men is a zero care factor issue in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:59 PM
18

There's discernable issues arising from corporations who adopt woke affirmative action gender policies, if that's what you mean.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 06:19 PM
1

By an order of magnitude.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 12:33 PM
1

There, there, take care.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 06:59 PM
10

Because these women have a "Madonna-Whore complex" where they experience a dichotomy between men as being considered sex objects and men as beings. If you go to any of these university campuses, these women are right into hookup culture, but can't ever stand men to actually have an intimate relationship with any of them.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 11:53 AM
0

Young women are more likely to contract STIs because they're all having sex with the same 5% of guys. The medical field has known this fact for a while now, but it's too political to discuss it. It's the reason why they don't screen STIs in young men - only 5% of them are high risk, whereas most women are high risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 11:44 AM
7

The term "objectification" came from Freud's study on "the Universal Tendency of debasement in the Sphere of Love". This paper then became the formulation of what is described as "The Madonna-Whore complex". In great irony, 2nd wave feminists hitched on this and redefined it to try make men their "Madonnas" in their own Madonna-Whore complex. They wrote tons of literature about nasty men having Madonna-Whore induced misogyny, e.g. "The female eunuch" is a classic of this period. So while feminis…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 11:38 AM
0

David Buss has done an amazing number of studies.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 11:29 AM
6

SMART MAN! To everyone else, read this. Always remember what pot brothers attorney at law say on STFU Fridays.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 05:02 AM
2

That's just the regular garden snake variety psychopathic tendencies going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 04:51 AM
2

Women have sex with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 04:49 AM
6

Men don't appreciate the increase risk of STI from modern women either, but what choice is there when every women considers it a right of passage to do a hoe phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 04:47 AM
-5

Because most single heterosexual men get don't have much sex, unlike single women, and women's vaginas are built to withstand viruses like aids.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 04:42 AM
10

The study minimizes the other studies which show attractiveness advantages women by an order of magnitude. Men aren't nearly rewarded for being attractive. Men need to bring more to the table than that, they need to be "successful". David Buss has done tons of studies on this.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 04:29 AM
45

FTA: The number of studies that claim that attractiveness is more beneficial for women is almost equal to the number of studies that claim it is more beneficial for men. Moreover... LOL
/r/MensRights09/12/23 09:28 PM
13

Shows what University's have become.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 09:23 PM
1

Yes, it was called "womanizing".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 07:42 PM
1

Sounds like something Purdue Pharma executive Richard Sackler would come up with.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 07:28 PM
3

He held financial matters over my head in regards to school or things I needed in life. Cut him out of your life, as soon as ypu get financial freedom.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 10:31 PM
1

What is a "traditional marriage" if it's not egalitarian? The premise of such an idea is ridiculous. Can I reply referencing ifstudies or is that considered biased? The problem here is repetition The point is, most modern "marriages" are female dominated and non egalitarian now. Because they aren't really marriages. It's really just an agreement for the guy to help her buy a house and have kids, go through IVF...etc and whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 04:33 AM
3

And the survey says yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 09:19 PM
1

That's delegation, I suppose most democracies have administrative delegation. Find me a democracy that doesn't have a leader, like a president or a prime minister?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:06 PM
0

Those marriages, the woman wears the pants. The majority of marriages are like this, like 4/5 marriages I see these days, it's not uncommon. Everything is a debate and the man always loses the debate, because the woman is apparently the better communicator. Because communication is about talking, reframing, minimising, and persistence. Men disengaging is the problem in these relationships, with the woman eventually divorcing him. Which is why most marriages end with women divorcing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 07:38 PM
1

I've never seen it done.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 06:57 PM
1

But a key reason for marriage is women wanting to control men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:35 PM
1

A key cause of dead bedrooms is women wanting to control the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:32 PM
2

It's free market up until you put a ring on it, then it becomes pure exhortation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:25 PM
1

Those comments are about hybristophilia.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 01:18 PM
7

And just to think, he could have bagged a real keeper.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 09:52 AM
6

Wrong. Gynocentrism make the objectification of men purportedly to be men's fault. There's been TONs of literature about men objectifying women, it started with Freud and it's the ONLY thing feminists agree with Freud upon, they otherwise entirely disagree with Freud and trash him as being patriarchal. There is just about NOTHING on women doing the same toward men. Historically, Freud never wrote that it didn't occur in women - he actually did note that it occurred in women, he just didn't write…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 05:44 AM
3

Sex sells. And this sells to women because women's cruelty toward men is sexual in nature. Calling men "incels", saying "cover your drinks..." - it's the darker side of female sexuality.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 05:34 AM
8

The "cutting off sex" once they have a ring is often somewhat to do with the sexual dichotomy women now have toward men due to modern dating - a "Madonna-Whore" complex where women often do comment in those subs that "sex isn't love", and that they don't see their spouse as sexual beings at all, because sex is something these women did with nameless men on Tinder.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 03:55 AM
2

Good point.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 03:49 AM
1

PPD cop a lot from the reddit admins, they walk a thin line. They survive through just temp banning everyone whenever Reddit admins contact them about something. They're known for being fickle greek gods who temp ban for anything. But they rarely perma-ban, so they're good like that. The sh*t going on in the DB multiverse is insane. They're used to be a forum /r/banfromdb that reacted to all the accusations of rape on /r/deadbedrooms, (called "rape-lite" because it's not rape that any jury would…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 03:28 AM
2

But they do have a problem because women claim lack of agency and victimhood status to the disparity on how they treat different types of men. When in reality women have a Madonna-Whore complex that society isn't dealing with appropriately.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 03:09 AM
1

Also, blackmailing by threats of suicide are a common thing of Cluster B disorders. E.g. the BPD ex who rings guys and says "If you don't get back with me, I'll kill myself". The courts appear to rewarding this behaviour.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 11:22 PM
63

This appears to be becoming a social issue now. There's an ongoing defamation case going on in Australia and the woman's own conduct on the night is under question, one important fact is she told police she had gone to see a doctor, and she told work she needed a day off to see a doctor. But she didn't go see a doctor. She says because she wasn't looking after herself at the time. However, it doesn't look good because a motive would be that she didn't want a medical examination to show evidence …
/r/MensRights01/12/23 05:09 PM
1

Whenever anything comes up in the workplace, bring out your journal of unreasonable behaviour, it's insurance.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:53 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 04:51 PM
1

Write it down.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 10:01 PM
14

I think you need to be more careful of corporate selfeminishists, there's an element of psychopathy in what they do.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 06:19 PM
1

This is very ignorant of the east.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 05:36 PM
1

That's a Northern European issue, other countries like Australia didn't replicate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 05:33 PM
2

Is it sad when post-wall women write editorials proclaiming a realisation that they don't need men? In that circumstance it's described as being a strong woman. We read this stuff all the time. Women aren't writing editorials about how they adore their husbands. Men need to accept this and stop trying to change women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 05:10 PM
2

That's not very realistic. It's pretty rare these days for couples to love each other beyond a year or two. Everyone claims they didn't love all the people they've been fucking. What's the truth anymore? Marriage is just something women do these days when they want kids. It's not about love anymore, it's mens fault for deceiving themselves that women "love" them. Feminists certainly aren't telling men that women love them, so why the self-deception?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 04:44 PM
1

And probably throw in a bit of domestic situations too by the sounds of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:19 AM
4

Because there's over a 3% chance the childs genetics are different and their health is impacted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:18 AM
3

That's obviously unreasonable and suspicious behaviour. Asking for dead people's DNA as an excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:15 AM
0

So medically speaking, we should assume the childs genetics, as otherwise it may betray trust?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:13 AM
-1

They should atleast get the blood group of the father.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:11 AM
1

They're often leaving details out about their own behaviour though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:09 AM
1

It's the same women who will tell you yelling isn't abusive when women do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 12:08 AM
1

Women these days aren't natural. They take contraceptive pills when single and go to IVF clinics to freeze eggs for a future marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 11:28 PM
1

David Buss has written a phenomenal number of papers. Why would either of them say things to get clicks. It's not onlyfans. Why do people struggle to accept science?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 11:22 PM
-1

I was watching a video of Jordan Peterson and David Buss have a talk, and even they said in effect that it is difficult to swallow the red pill and understand that society isn't equal in how women treat men. They arent 15.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 12:03 AM
1

Commitment phobic actually means he was "giving of resources" phobic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 10:08 PM
1

That's like arguing, if I purchase an apple for $2, it's not an equal exchange because I didn't purchase an apple using the same apple. Market forces ensure that when a woman decides to have sex with "a certain type of guy", that guy has other options, and therefore having sex with her is of less value, and so it is a fair exchange. An unfair exchange would be if she went through a hoe phase then pretends it never happened and says that sex is more risky to women, so to deceive a guy into thinki…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 10:04 PM
3

Not true. If she's being deceived, that doesn't prove someone is deceiving her. She can be deceiving herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 01:13 AM
1

Exactly. Women do risky sexual things with the right guy because it's a fair exchange for genes. Then with other guys they complain about how risky sex is, because they dont see it as a fair exchange for resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 09:38 PM
46

that toxic masculinity is based around the 'lie that sexual activity is a measure of worth of a man'. It's actually WOMEN who do this toward men, and the whole thing is projection deriving from their own dichotomous thinking about sex.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 09:12 PM
1

If it truly wasn't a fair exchange, we wouldn't have 95% of women having multiple sex partners before marriage. It just doesn't add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 08:04 PM
2

By the laws of supply and demand, it clearly is a fair exchange that the majority of women participate in. It's only later argued as"not a fair exchange" for reasons of bargaining resources from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 01:52 PM
2

Sex for sex isn't a fair exchange between men and women. Women have far more to lose (and I really shouldn't have to list it). Men get frustrated cuz we want casual sex, usually with multiple women. That's going to cost money, Playboy. No way around it. It is inexplicably an exchange that the majority of women now make atleast sometime in their life, however. And they haven't any persuasive argument as to why they hold such a dichotomy regarding sex. Apparently it's not a fair exchange because t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 11:24 PM
–

But they were though, particularly if we go back 30 or 40 years. There's certainly a trend going on here, it's became a majority of women aren't marrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 11:19 PM
4

We had a horrendous HR manager who stacked her department with women who used to make up the most ridiculous legal fiction. E.g. to get paid for previous overtime they'd try to make you sign a form changing other entitlements. She once said that men should work unpaid overtime, because they are men.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 09:26 PM
2

You've already won the argument at that point.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 08:45 PM
–

Between 20 and 30?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 08:42 PM
0

The salary to be a writer for the guardian must be bad. Only narcissists seem to want to do it.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 11:16 AM
–

That's not stratified per cohort. The younger cohort are in majority not marrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/23 11:00 AM
1

But for good men to have gone, you would have to have had them. Otherwise the phrase would be "They don't make men like they used to" or "Men these days" or similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 05:49 PM
12

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63803341 It says joint custody and expenses and ontop of that he pays her because she was awarded the children. Wealth definitely has something to do with it.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:20 PM
1

Who made that order?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:07 PM
1

Does that include the majority of women who don't marry? The reality is, the majority of women no longer meet a man by 25. Because where have all the good men gone?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 04:54 PM
1

Then how does it fit that the saying is "Where have all the good men gone?" Wouldn't the saying be "Men these days", or similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 04:50 PM
0

They are under the delusion that participating in a sexual market has no impact on their behaviour in the relationship market.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 04:43 PM
2

So what's the market telling you then? It's telling you that there are no good men. But where have all the good men gone?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 04:31 PM
1

Exactly. Rather than have annoying things like judges and jurors, any accussed man should be Cancelled, and any women who doesn't leave him immediately should be labelled as a betrayor to the sisterhood. Remember sister's, the patriarchy is out to oppress you, we need to stay vigilante against the ever watching eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 04:03 PM
1

From 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 03:39 PM
1

They are talking about booklets from over a hundred years ago, and other things that never happened to them.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:35 PM
1

I'm discussing the circular logic of the criminal courts and family courts going on here.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:25 PM
65

Data recorded by Advance shows that around 25% of children stay with their father when a mother is in jail, compared with 90% staying with their mother when a father is sentenced, suggesting "there is a bigger impact on the whole family when a woman goes to prison". LOL. Doing acrobatics with Family court judgements.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 01:44 AM
10

I'm not sure, but it's definitely being normalised in the media. I was amazed at how pedestrian Amber's actions were considered during the Depp vs Heard trial. The double standards are shocking. Hollywood paints a very notmalised picture of what is truly alarming behaviour among women.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 01:33 AM
2

The funniest video I've seen in ages, so on point, particularly that observation of how a female lead are written in to come out as bisexual so to show LGBTQ support and it's just so f*cking cheesy and condescending and cringe.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 10:44 PM
17

What you list are actually key indicators of a Cluster B personality disorder in women.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 10:02 PM
5

I don't have any opinion on whether a CEO is female or male makes a difference but your example of the CEO of Optus Australia is an interesting case study. Her failures seem to stem from the devaluation of key roles in the organisation that are traditionally seen as male dominated, or areas which men are more inclined and interested in performing. These areas have been outsourced, with men overworked and underpaid, and no leadership accountability was shown when the tech disasters occurred. Ther…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 09:15 PM
3

Only about 5% of women marry as virgin's today.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 04:17 AM
3

Not quite, if a guy stops looking for love and just focuses on getting sex, ironically he will get much more offers for commitment from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 04:15 AM
1

Well, if we really analysed Reddit, we would conclude that a female dark triad exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 04:41 PM
3

Can have those things without having sex. In fact, women as they increase in n-count then want those things without wanting sex. They start to demand it, like it's a contractual entitlement that men provide it to them. And there's a reason for this, and so we start to wonder why. And that's why women feel bad about losing their virginity and having a past... They can't truly provide the reasons, because the reasons illustrate that there can never be such a contractual agreement given to them tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/23 04:37 PM
2

I've read on reddit of women getting wet when their husbands tell off other men in the workplace. The thing is, these women probably have their own set of Cluster-B issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:02 PM
1

Actually, they think that disagreeableness is higher in men to keep dark triad traits in line among men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 09:00 PM
2

This research is still rather preliminary and underfunded. David Buss appears to be at the forefront, but I disagree with some of his views. I find him too apologetic toward young women. In particular, he says that as women mature they lose interest in dark triad traits, due to learning more about men. I disagree. I think young women go for dark triad traits because young women have similar traits themselves, and it's this that they outgrow. Young women have a high amount of other Cluster B diso…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 08:52 PM
3

As in, it's used as a masculine pro-noun, to denigrate men's worth in society. Historically it held no meaning as prostitution was common.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 12:29 PM
9

As soon as a woman is no longer a virgin it's weird to them to meet men who aren't in the same boat because it makes women feel really bad that they aren't virgin's anymore. You see this in how society changed the term of "virgin" from being effeminate to semi-masculine. We now rarely ever discuss if a woman is a virgin (because she usually isn’t) and instead discuss if a man is a virgin. Centuries ago, asking a man if he was a virgin would have been a very strange question, like asking if he wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 07:02 AM
2

They do, example, Joey Swoll.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 11:41 PM
1

As a guy you always got to be changing jobs and looking for better employment conditions. Some guys work several jobs at once to make ends meet. Eventually, with experience you become more valuable. If you work for yourself you get to choose as many clients as you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 10:39 PM
23

Alimony ponies.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 05:12 PM
0

Women who go around making false accusations are unsafe to be around.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:23 PM
2

From a young age I read stories about guys making women uncomfortable by hitting on them and so my response was to simply never do it. The problem with this is the actor-observor bias inherit to these stories. In their mind, a guy who's making them uncomfortable, is a guy hitting on them. And if you act guilty, then you fit the definition. That's their definition of being hit upon. On other occasions, they explain it as "chemistry", and "vibing" or something similar, yet not the same term. Their…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 11:01 AM
0

Sounds like men shouldn't feel safe around you.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 10:19 AM
0

They're for pregnant looking people suffering cravings for wendies.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 11:12 AM
1

You've been reading too many bodice rippers and fantasising too much. Men have better shit to do. We really do. Fuck me, a guy is a thousand times more likely to get assaulted in a carpark than a woman.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 11:10 AM
6

You guys might think of me as a Pick Me girl ora Attention Seeker Men never use these words, this is purely a women thing, an intrasexual competition thing, used to throw shade at sexual rivals.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 10:41 PM
8

The author obviously suffers from narcissistic mortification induced panic attacks whenever walking along the sidewalk. Someone call her a car.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:16 PM
2

Never talk to the police! STFU. Always remember, it's STFU friday when it comes to the police and mens rights.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:17 PM
2

They will be selling the data they collected.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 09:12 PM
1

Most young people don't experience love at all these days, except when they look in the mirror. Are they feeling like they are missing out? The answer is, you are missing out. You are missing out on having relationships with these types of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 03:24 PM
3

Thoughts? In your example, her communication is obviously not open. Why does this occur? Because if she told the truth, they'd break up. Now, if it were openly understood that lack of communication on this means they should separate, as in if he discussed separating over this... Then this this entire dynamic changes! So in many ways it's his fault because he's one who can change this dynamic. If they taught this at sex ed, then this wouldn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/23 03:07 PM
2

It's true though. This Incel bullshit is tiring.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/23 03:17 PM
1

Incels is just made up bullshit to make women feel better about not being virgins before marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 11:30 AM
-1

I would help them understand human heirarchies and how it impacts how people are treated, and explain why it creates blindspots in society. Example is schoolyard bullying, is in majority allowed in schools because the female administrators find it attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/23 11:28 AM
8

It seems to me that job roles that require unpaid overtime go to men.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 11:16 AM
2

The heightism going on in social media simply didn't exist decades ago. It's quite nutty really.
/r/MensRights03/11/23 11:14 AM
1

You need to flag it with the reddit admins. Reddit seems to go around in a circle on this.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 08:14 PM
2

It's the Madonna-Whore complex, they have a sexual dichotomy toward men.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 08:57 PM
1

It does have to do with mens rights in that Feminists claim that ONLY men do this, they've been making this claim since the 1970s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Female_Eunuch
/r/MensRights25/09/23 08:52 PM
1

It's actually the Madonna-Whore complex, if you read Freud, but I have to ask you, why would you be interested in such women?
/r/MensRights25/09/23 01:17 PM
-3

They don't. I'm sorry but the statistics show men cheat more, when over 30.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 10:08 AM
-1

I'm a bit cynical about this post. Seems OP is trying to justify delaying marriage as being their future partners fault for doing future things that have never happened. This is going to be a horrible marriage, and it hasn't even happened yet!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 09:33 PM
1

When you are having regular sex, your brain gets trained to be turned on by them, even when they get older. So your brain doesn't notice the difference. I didn't notice this until we stopped having sex for 6 years then started again and I really noticed the age difference then.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/23 06:46 PM
7

Mean girl clubs. They're everywhere on the internet.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 05:00 PM
6

That's their insecurity, not yours. Leave it be. Being a virgin should make fuck all difference. Some women think it's sweet and special, my first girlfriend thought so.
/r/MensRights21/08/23 10:01 AM
1

You saying statistics from China aren't accurate?!? Get outa here, now way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/23 06:50 AM
2

4) If she's interested in you, she'll give you a window of time to make moves. She'll typically throw some signals your way by being close to you, lingering by your car or making it easy to kiss her. If you don't escalate during this window, you will be rejected. She will think you're not masculine, inexperienced, gay, not interested in her or something is wrong with you. You HAVE to act when you have an open lane. She's literally holding out her hands to be her dance partner here HOT TIP: How t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/23 07:15 AM
2

Hold that thought and reconsider it in 10 years time... What tends to happen, is as single women get older, they approach guys more, so I'm not sure what you learned but it seems a lot of women learn something different when it comes to intrasexual competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 02:51 AM
0

So it's fine for HER to go through invasive pregnancy but God forbid YOU do a damn thing, got it Huh? Pregnancy is a natural part of life, it's actually quite normal to get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 11:51 PM
2

Hotter women initiate more?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 11:29 PM
4

I wonder why some men are so averse to it. https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/neeztz/til_that_147_of_men_that_had_a_vasectomy_reported/ https://www.reddit.com/r/postvasectomypain/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:34 PM
1

You know, Rollo Tomassi's inspiration for writing the book came from his brother-in-law committing suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:31 PM
1

But if you can't be arsed, you ain't going to be good. E.g. Studies show the amount of sex couples have is set by the woman initiating.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:12 PM
1

May be they should copies of the Rational Male in the school library.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 10:08 PM
0

I understand the defecits of solipsism, but I can't display genuine empathy in your place. You need to learn how to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 09:35 PM
-1

My school friend hung himself. I dont use it as an effigy like this
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 09:24 PM
8

LOL. There's plenty of men who don't! Only Top G cares about that, and she's all for Top G only and the other guys can go get fucked. The word is intrasexual competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 08:32 PM
17

Basically you don't notice these unattainable standards for women because you don't care about them. So it's women doing this to other women, blaming men and getting more power for it. Essentially, it's women gaslighting other women for power.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 08:01 PM
3

That's the new skinny. Go take a look at what people looked like in the 1970s.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 07:59 PM
1

I think the problem these days is people don't take ownership of the fact that their previous sex life impacts their marriage but instead choose to project the problems this causes them, onto their spouses. So no wonder people divorce, I'm surprised they stay married.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 07:35 PM
2

That's vapid gynocentricism. We did this. It has failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 07:15 PM
3

Actually in aggregate, most men want a committed relationship. The big issue is, women lose interest in sex in relationships: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20170914/Sex-drive-declines-twice-as-much-in-women-than-men-in-long-term-relationships.aspx So guys are rather reluctant to participate in relationships because of this. Now, women can learn how to be monogamous, how to incorporate sex into a relationship to help it grow. But hell no, what's important to women is career, and options and f…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 06:57 PM
5

That's fundamentally the problem here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 06:47 PM
2

The thing is, fundamentally, as a collective, women view the idea of marrying young as patriarchal oppression, essentially because women want to sleep around before marriage. So, if you are on a school board, and you propse such ideas, you will get shotdown as being patriarchal and be told that it's more important that women focus on their careers...etc, and delay marriage. If you then ask, what about sex? Aren't they going to have sex, it's then blamed as men's fault and they want to teach the …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 06:33 PM
1

How do you feel when some teenagers do make wise decisions about dating and love, do you feel it's inappropriate that others lecturer you that this happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 06:16 PM
9

Relationships have become an extension of Schrödinger’s Feminism, whereby a situationship/fwb arrangement is simultaneously a relationship and not a relationship, until something happens, and the woman chooses the state which maximizes her narrative argument the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 06:12 PM
4

That was a second wave feminism slogan!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 05:58 PM
11

I thought the feminist slogan was that women, at large, have internalised misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:04 PM
2

May not be narcissistic but Cluster B, and the deadbedroom is highly correlated too! The Idolize -> Devalue-> Discard cycle is part of the Narcissistic defence strategy that Cluster B sufferers employ. This doesn't just occur in Narcissistic Personality Disorder, but also in Borderline Personality disorder and Histrionic Personality Disorder. The dead bedroom occurs, also as a isolating mechanism - they will often shit on their partners behind their backs so to isolate them from their friends. C…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 11:39 AM
2

What could be the reason for a woman to talk about her sexual past in such detail, especially when she knows the man she is currently dating has way less experience? I can't get my head around it. Idolize -> Devalue-> Discard.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 05:50 AM
10

Germaine Greer. Because she was utter hypocrite and does everything she blames men about. She recalls her first husband saying "I can have any woman in this room...", surely a comment of hubris, as she literally did have every man in the room!!! She first writes about how men want "Madonna" wives, meanwhile she branch swings from one bad boy to the next and finally lands a beta-simp well into her menopause, where she carefully re-reflects on the true value of companionship, and revises her radic…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 04:33 AM
1

You never get to see your friends though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 04:32 AM
–

The concept of "vetting" is a good example of this dichotomy. It's a perfect example of women trying to virtue-signal their purity, quite often while hiding their promiscuous behaviour. Studies also show women select more masculine features for short term mating, altruism being low on the list: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sexual-personalities/201501/women-want-short-term-mates-too The "vetting" argument is also an example of "schrodingers feminism": Women are having sex with men, in …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 02:43 AM
–

Sex with someone who sees you as an equal partner can be a beautiful thing, transcendent even. Women no longer see men as equal partners, in whole, but instead are split. There's the dominant men they want to have sex with. Then there's the submissive men they delay sex with, and marry. This is the narrative now: When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 01:11 AM
–

It's not about purity, rather it's that high-n women see men as inpure - those stories you just wrote, the women then blame their husbands over it and also do other shit like think their husbands are below the guys that used them because these women carry dominance issues and sexual dichotomy problems that would shock Freud.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/23 12:07 AM
–

I think marriage can be fun too but if you hoe around it won't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:19 PM
–

This is classic "because of Chad, I take it out on Brad" mentality. Studies show women are doing this BTW. Ironically, this why men don't like high n-counts. It's got nothing to do with being dirty, its got everything to do with being damaged.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 11:16 PM
3

Good luck getting my wife interested in sex, she's married now. She did go to a sex party in her hoe phase, took her housemate - no one had sex with him. She basically says women are only interested in sex during their hoe phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:24 PM
2

But how so? You saying they're all 10s? I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:21 PM
2

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 10:17 PM
0

Divorcees often have a history of a dead bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 09:27 PM
2

No, attractive women end up settling because they're alpha widowed and no where near as attractive as women younger than them. That's TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 09:19 PM
6

How so? It's hypergamy 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 07:26 PM
0

That survey intentionally didn't ask about sexlessness, and yet it writes: More content on normal marital development could be helpful. For example, information could be provided about how satisfaction typically drops and conflict tends to increase during the transition to parenthood (e.g., Doss, Rhoades, Stanley, & Markman, 2009b) and about the course of attraction and sexual desire in relationships. As in, they knew the above, yet intentionally did not ask questions about it in the survey. Rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 06:52 PM
6

Well duh. Why else do you think these women want to go to these parties? They're sexually dissatisfied with their slob partners, and dress to the 9's because there's obviously going to be intrasexual competition during the evening for the top G.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 06:38 PM
1

They make you feel as if someone else owns you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 06:36 PM
2

No. I don't even wear my wedding ring much anymore. Nobody notices.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 05:54 PM
1

If you're in a dead bedroom, wear the ring in public only but take it off when going to bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 05:44 PM
1

The wedding ring is a fashion item and is optional to wear.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 05:35 PM
1

There's no actual meaning to marriage that's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:59 PM
2

Because of tradition. Uh ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:54 PM
1

Because of tradition. Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:54 PM
1

Because of tradition. Hmmm....
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:53 PM
1

Because of tradition. I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:53 PM
1

Because of tradition. Wow I never knew women are such traditionalists.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:52 PM
3

Because of tradition. Understood.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:52 PM
2

Because of tradition. Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:51 PM
1

It's tradition, as you see on the replies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:51 PM
1

They're called Fake Trad-Cons in TRP world and they take up a lot of space, see Rollo's last videos.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/23 04:43 PM
0

Exactly. And you make new friends too.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 07:28 AM
1

This is gold. Thanks OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 10:25 AM
1

Quite possibly. If you have two normal distributions, with same mean, one with higher variance, you add them together and take a top percentile, the highly variant distribution is going to be over-represented, and the only way to correct it is to shift the mean of the second distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:56 PM
1

Classic Schrödinger.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/23 03:50 PM
3

I was going cancel it anyway.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 03:38 PM
5

Social media has sure fucked her head up. That's not normal.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 03:35 PM
2

Nothing to do with the reddit blackout.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:46 AM
1

God I hate attorney's, they think the sun shines out their ass. Do you really believe clients spend $600 an hour to talk about blow jobs and granola?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 11:08 AM
3

Seriously though, talk about getting trolled. There's like 120k subscribers here, there's no way automation made this mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 08:46 AM
4

You should have told them No Trolling!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 04:10 AM
2

The prom is utter bullshit, seriously fucking nuke that shit, what are they playing at, pretending to help young people get married. Utter Bullshit. One guy took a prostitute to the prom and introduced her to the teachers and board, it's just ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 02:41 AM
-1

No, it's just that, yeah not hiring because of race, and all this shit about gender equality in the workplace, wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 02:39 AM
1

Stuff like that happens to just about everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 02:38 AM
3

I think this provides a compelling argument that the burden of childcare is NOT the primary reason for husbands outearning wives in marriages. I'm not following this, because the chart shows that the more children they have, the more the husband outearns the wife. Are you saying that it should start with lower than 48%? Note that "no children" wouldn't reflect no children yet, but it seems that when women want children their husbands start outearning them. Perhaps because society doesn't like hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 12:48 AM
-1

Fuck, the black man just can't get a break can he. That's damnable evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 12:40 AM
2

I think FWBs are womens covert contract these days. "I was in an FWB and we moved in and he left me!" Like, seriously? It's like expecting marriage from hookers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 12:33 AM
1

You probably aren't unattractive though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/23 12:26 AM
29

This pretty much sums up the situation in Universities today: https://www.robkhenderson.com/p/status-symbols-and-the-struggle-for People go to University for many reasons, one is the status symbol, and so Universities cater for that, in exchange for $$$. Like the fable of the emporers new clothes, they walk in and get provided all these useless ideas which they think makes them better than other people, in exchange for money. And then they go out into the real world and that's when the shit hits…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 12:03 AM
1

Good talking.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 11:09 PM
5

That sh8t ain't over - they're claiming these Thai women live in domestic violence. Because that's what they think domestic violence laws are for, I suppose.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:08 PM
1

Exactly. Or forgetting to tell you they're switching prisons. All the normal stuff our bad boys get up to before we settle down and marry some lame ass guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 05:54 AM
1

Of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 03:22 AM
1

But as much as that happens, women dump guys for wanting commitment, so how is he being insincere? He was looking for a relationship but it didn't turn out.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 01:44 AM
1

This a way men get rid of women. Surely there's a misunderstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 01:41 AM
1

There would be a lot more virgin's around if everyone did that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 01:38 AM
2

But women do this too: they don’t want to embarrass themselves being seen with you Women these days keep their sexual conquests a secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 01:23 AM
1

I don't see this as a gender issue, women get upset at men not wanting to have sex with them, or chasing sex with other women. Example is, typically women get upset when a guy they have sex with dumps them, which is pretty common these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/23 01:12 AM
0

Doing chores helps foster independence in the relationship which promotes desire. The distinction being, that people that can do their own chores (for their own reasons), will find it easier to leave the old relationship and form a new relationship. And this is thus sexy - a sexual desire will exist to keep them from leaving. This is a different situation to one where women ask men to do chores and they do it - this does not display relationship independence, and as everything is to be done to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/23 12:28 PM
2

I'm not watching it because I read on twitter that Ryan Gosling plays Jordan Peterson, and I'm incapable of spending any more time on this because there's so much other stuff on twitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/23 06:31 AM
–

So then, basically most people aren't serial monogamists, because most people haven't followed that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/23 07:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter