TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SeaLionPrivilege Archive

View 0 posts and 128 comments by SeaLionPrivilege on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No one thinks you can actually be more extroverted This is totally wrong. you are being told to act different to get different results. Being right handed helps people be more successful in many aspects of life. No one thinks you can be more right-handed, no one is telling you how to feel, you are being told to use your right hand more than your left to get different results.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 12:49 PM
1

but no one will tell him that it is not actually his preference. They will, they will tell him that this is just a preference because he's being a coward who can't handle having to step up and go for something better. I love kind, gentle, emotionally vulnerable men. Yet TRP won't acknowledge that women can have this one preference, because then they can't blame women as a whole anymore. I'm kind and gentle, but I do it from a position of strength. When people talk about emotionally vulnerable, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/16 09:49 AM
6

The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature is a great entry level book for evolutionary psychology/biology. Easy to follow, has lots of interesting examples, etc.
/r/askTRP30/11/16 09:02 AM
12

If you find a girl you click with, don't be afraid to go for the close and be persistent as hell until you get it. I think that you should only be persistent if, after being rebuffed, you can see that it wasn't a total negative, which is not reliable and it can be hard to get right. Otherwise, move on when rejected.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 04:48 PM
3

Rust and Frank from TD (Season 1 and 2) are quite alpha. Rust for sure, Frank could be more debatable. Ross and Chandler from Friends are cancer-tier of betaness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 03:32 PM
2

I kinda feel like this isn't really fair play here. It's not. Many of these juxtapositions are done in jest, although this one is more serious because of the theme and the emotional impact of some of those pictures. I still prefer women out of combat roles and of the military all together. Only a minority can keep up in with the physical demands and their presence, according to studies and personal experiences of some vets, cause issues due to different reasons. I don't think this is an attack o…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:26 PM
2

For instance, if a man wants to have a family with one woman, TRP allows him to have this preference. (...)Women however, are not allowed to vary in their preferences. Go to ASKTRP, pose as a man and say you want to start a family with a 45 years old bipolar woman with three children from three different men. Or that you want to engage in an open relationship where your wife is allowed to sleep around, but you're not. Report back and tell me how much of a positive message you got, how much suppo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 03:18 PM
3

Mind that I don't adhere to all of TRP. TRP removes women's individuality. (AWALT, special snowflakes) It removes it from men as well, following the same logic (All Humans Are Like That). The idea is that the 9/10 sorority girl and the nerdy girl are both still women and both will, for the most part, react in a similar way to certain behaviours. Behave in a needy way with both and both will dump you hard and fast. AWALT is a base that is there to remind you of these things. TRP removes women's a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 09:40 AM
1

They were calling women out on their bullshit, something I'd never experienced. But "Women are Wonderful" doesn't exist apparently. How did you first react to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 09:30 AM
6

Can confirm. 100%. Nobody believes us, but that's exactly what it was. They keep denying it in this same sub. It's true though, that if this message was everywhere, why didn't it affect all young men? There's the endogenic factor in a person also that absorbed this message instead of rejecting it. A teacher tells the boys in class "Behave like girls if you want to get somewhere in life", boy A internalizes this message, boy B rejects it. Genetic, cultural, familiar and social factors have a big …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 09:25 AM
1

I don't know all the details, I just know she said they were all attractive or she wouldn't have gone out with them, and seeing as I've seen some of her boyfriends in person or picture and I've met her ex-husband, I believe her, as they were all handsome fit guys. Her teenagerish behaviour is like a magnet to attractive men, because she's not going out with some creeps or whatever.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/16 08:26 AM
2

So you can't walk the talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 10:20 PM
1

There's nothing that tastes as bitter as swallowing the red pill. Those thoughts you're having now? They will be glued to you for a long time. It'll pass though, sooner or later, it'll pass.
/r/askTRP27/11/16 01:46 PM
28

My cousin is 40. She looks early 30s and behaves like a teenager (fucked up childhood, I'm not holding it against her that she never managed to get over it). She went to Madrid last month and had, in 10 days, 21 dates, with attractive men (I take her word, I've seen her boyfriends and ex-husband). That's a 40 years old, go figure.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/16 11:51 AM
3

None of those, except caste, require marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 10:36 AM
1

In Africa yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 10:35 AM
1

Spouse maintenance is financial support paid by a party to a marriage to their spouse (or ex-spouse) so that they can adequately support themselves. This support can occur after separation or divorce, and is generally limited to a specific time frame. More info here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 10:35 AM
7

That's not what he said though. You talked extramarital, what OP implies is that if divorce wasn't so stacked against men, they may start divorce as often as women. Weren't you Australian? Alimony certainly exists there, although under a different name.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 10:05 AM
1

Do you really think, following what that user said, that life in America is equally dangerous, when it comes to sexual assaults, as Africa?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/16 10:04 AM
3

but 3 out of 5 colleage women getting raped can't be true despite the same methodology used to get both stats. Which responsible parents would send their daughters to college if there was such a high risk that they'd be raped?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 06:31 PM
1

Thanks for sharing. While I agree with their message, but evidently their delivery was awful and lacking any kind of empathy, as hammering it (almost literally) was working backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 12:35 PM
3

RIP in advance.
/r/askTRP26/11/16 12:34 PM
2

In my opinion, if you're contemplating "attraction statistics", you've got a long way to go yet. I'd suggest you actually focus on your social skills so you can pick social cues and spot women who want you to notice them or similar.
/r/askTRP26/11/16 12:33 PM
1

maybe something to do with toxic masculinity being shoved down my throat for all of my youth 🤷 Can you give some examples? As the opposite is more of the norm nowadays, so it'd be interesting to hear how it's from the other side.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/16 08:13 AM
2

If disrespect seems to be so common in your life, it may be worth looking at why that's happening, starting by yourself. Are you provoking this in any way? Do you give a very miserable or soft impression to people?
/r/askTRP25/11/16 04:23 PM
3

She's my first ever girlfriend and is older than me. There will be more, for sure, so get out of this one or you'll just getting very hurt.
/r/askTRP25/11/16 04:22 PM
2

That's really the crab mentality at work, perfect example. The less influence they have over you, the better. Let them rot in their toxicity, you have the right attitude. This sentence : but i'd rather suffer and be responsible for my mistakes and move forward than crumble and be average to appease them. How many people are capable of genuinely saying this? Not many. God, family, girlfriend...you've got yourself and I can't imagine any better company than that. Good luck bro, I think you're doin…
/r/askTRP25/11/16 10:44 AM
4

I don't really have anything substantial to tell you, but I want to give you props on the attitude. You seem to be unshakable in the sense that you don't surrender, you just keep going. You come from a toxic family and manage to graduate from college. You have this and that other mishap and what you say is but i say screw them i gotta get on my feet. So, in any case, you're an inspiration. I've got a question though, besides all the drugs you're being prescribed, is there any true psychiatric wo…
/r/askTRP25/11/16 07:55 AM
4

Do you experience this, too, when you speak in a different language? If yes, is the effect different between the 3 foreign languages you know? I speak four languages fluently (fourth one is not so high level) and some people constantly tell me how different my personality seems to be in each one of them and I wonder if it's because of the environment where I learned it. In example, in English I sound serious and deattached (I learned it online), in my two native languages I sound louder and chee…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 07:17 AM
7

If you see the "world" as only US-college, then I'm sure the 80/20 rule applies. Outside of it, it doesn't work that way, like the top comment of this thread, with average couples. I think the best example is to spend some hours in transit in any European airport. Most people are extremely average and in relationships with other extremely average people. For the most part, the world keeps spinning the same way, but I do firmly believe that by swallowing the red pill (not just the part about wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 07:06 AM
1

That "off" feeling is most likely guilt from your social conditioning of being "nice". Something in your brain is like "This is not going to get us kicked from the tribe, right?". It will pass and you did great, but look for ways he'll try to recover his power in his relationship with you.
/r/askTRP24/11/16 08:06 AM
1

It's hard to talk about your past sex life without appearing to be arrogant, pretentious or that you're trying to raise your value via artificial social preselection ("I've been with these women, therefore, I must be attractive...right? RIGHT!?").
/r/askTRP24/11/16 08:02 AM
2

it might be because women used to be so ridiculously underprivileged, oppressed, abused, and disempowered Compared to kings and bishops? Sure. Compared to your average male peasant? Not really. Can't imagine nothing more disempowered than having to die for your feudal lord very far away from home to wounds, disease, famine or cold.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 08:03 PM
3

One step back, two steps forward. Change takes times, don't be too harsh on yourself, but remember this moment as one you don't want to repeat.
/r/askTRP23/11/16 01:52 PM
1

You got to start internalizing the message you want, which is in this case, to be tougher emotionally. Also, you need to start separating from the messages you got in your youth, when your family encouraged you to be soft. To do so, challenge those statements, but accept that, as for now, they have a huge influence over you. That's how it is, for now. I recommend you to actively look for ways to test your frame and practice. Things like frame are a skill, and all skills need practice and plannin…
/r/askTRP23/11/16 01:51 PM
1

Ah, misunderstood you. Yeah, in that sense, it's not going to pick up satire or similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:52 AM
2

Are you a man who has sisters and likes drugs (LSD), honest assholes, dancing to music, cooking and talking about relationships and sex? http://snoopsnoo.com/u/BiggerDthanYou That's the page he meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 09:44 AM
1

any method suggestions? beside these: None of those are strictly emotional though. How do you deal with uncomfortable social situations? How's your emotional control? Also, what does being "soft" mean to you exactly?
/r/askTRP23/11/16 07:15 AM
1

Moreover, men and women are similar in many aspects. And extremely different in others. Housewife vs deadbeat loser to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 06:52 PM
1

At the very core, the target of life is to have offspring, so if you don't have offspring, you're a failure. It's maybe more nuanced than this. Maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 02:56 PM
-3

Lügenpresse I'm happy this is taking off.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 02:54 PM
1

I understand The Red Pill competely, it's a bunch of insecure men whining about not getting their penises touched so they lift weights and learn social skills. Shits not complicated. Link.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 08:57 AM
1

I have a penis. I don't like my girlfriends to have penises. Damn double standards, where I have something, but I don't expect the women to have it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 08:56 AM
1

Talks about the double standard of slut-shaming, engages in virgin-shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 08:55 PM
2

He's engaging in some heavy hypocrisy which he couldn't see, so we're on to a bad beginning.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 07:25 PM
1

What, in my post, led you to the conclusion that I'm saying that he's not open minded? I'm saying that he's not going to change his view on this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 05:20 PM
2

Elaborate on what you mean, I'm not following you here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 04:37 PM
3

How is this a "bitter rant?" Pointing out a global trend about TRP isn't "attacking red pillers or the red pill itself," he's literally discussing what he sees. This is a CMV, not a discussion, not a Q4RP. Is there any chance he'd change his mind, considering how he opened it? Also, I can assure you OP isn't the insecure type. Actions, words, loud, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 04:36 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 04:35 PM
5

So yeah, pointless CMV because you won't have your view changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 01:06 PM
7

Nothing? Because what you wrote sounds like the virgin-shaming I wrote in my answer, which would prove my point and make you an hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 01:03 PM
6

What's exactly wrong with insecure men lifting weights and learning social skills to have their penises touched?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 01:00 PM
8

What's the point of this CMV? It feels like a bitter rant of someone so insecure, that he/she has to reassure him/herself in the flair. There are double standards in dating, deal with it. Women get slut shamed, men get virgin shamed. That's how it goes. Why would you try to attack red pillers or the Red Pill itself if you don't understand it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 12:52 PM
0

I put integrity in high value, so if I give my word that I'm in an exclusive relationship with someone, I will keep that word. I have been tempted many times in the past, but my arrogance ("I'm above breaking my own word") has protected me well enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 12:45 PM
1

Sounds hypocritical. Dating and relationships are filled with asymmetrical things. Calling everything hypocrisy and double standard would get old very fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 08:39 AM
1

Wombatinaburrow's definition of "to freak out" : To wonder if the other person will be back for tea. Dictionary's : freak out : informal to be or cause to be in a heightened emotional state, such as that of fear, anger, or excitement Let me know when yours make it into a dictionary.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/16 10:49 PM
1

If a mother freaks out each time the """child""" goes away, then yeah, that's helicopter mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/16 10:52 AM
1

I can't retract from something I didn't say.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/16 10:52 AM
1

Your argument was to take something and extrapolate it to a situation where you can, somehow, fight the argument, while avoiding fighting the argument. What I've done is to present the opposite of your argument to show that is non-sense and : This doesn't make sense. You got to agree, indirectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 04:16 PM
1

You're attacking the argument by giving it a label that has a shaming connotation, therefore, it's shaming and not an argument. If you made an argument and I said "It's stupid", it'd be the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 04:14 PM
1

It's your argument, so yeah supporting it is your responsibility unless you concede. Concede? Is this a contest now? How else do you interpret that other than expectations are different? In many possible ways that doesn't involve create a straw man to attack me. Cite where I said I expected something from my partners, communication wise, that they shouldn't expect from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 04:13 PM
1

I'm not being evasive. There are lots of resources, with different angles (biology, social, cultural) on how to approach the communication differences between men and women. Loaded questions like the ones you asked (quote below) are not very conductive for conversation. Do women not want basic information beyond "what are you doing?" - "stuff", or are men less capable of giving such information?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 01:28 PM
1

Guaranteed No. routinely. No. If something different with a purpose like in OP becomes a routine, it will stop working so it will become pointless (for that purpose), therefore, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 11:31 AM
0

t.helicopter mom
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 09:15 AM
1

Show me where I said I'm behaving this way with a girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 09:15 AM
1

Who said I'm behaving this way?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 09:00 AM
1

What problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 08:51 AM
1

What are you guys projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 08:43 AM
1

Roses are red, violets are blue, I have nothing else to say, neither do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 08:06 AM
1

It's not, I just don't have to reply to your question because it doesn't matter what the answer is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 08:01 AM
1

When I said this, I got a number of responses saying that I keep men on a short leash, am entitled , and this is way too much to ask for. Why didn't you write all the things you said that triggered that kind of response though? Lol if my husband said he was going to be back in an hour and when I say "where?" and he said "out" and just left, I would change the locks to the house while he is gone. \ Well don't be sarcastic and try to imply that you are cheating on me on a regular basis in some att…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 08:00 AM
1

Utterly meaningless statement unless you provide how they are different and why that matters to the extent communication expectations should be lopsided. Not my responsibility. Because expecting things from your SO and then expecting they shouldn't have those same expectations from you is shitty. Who said I expected those things from them? Cite it or stop making up false arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:35 AM
1

"Childish/Teenagerish" is not an argument, only shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:34 AM
1

You can keep creating all sorts of arguments to twist it all around. I can also play that. A particular couple has no routine even when living together. What now?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:33 AM
1

1) I don't mind criticism. 2) It's still shaming. 3) Still not argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:32 AM
0

Triggered.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:32 AM
1

Silence is communication as well. What's with all the teen shaming in this thread though. What are you guys projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:31 AM
1

Asymmetrical behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:29 AM
1

It's stating a fact. + to your ears Does not compute.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:29 AM
1

You are creating scenarios to strengthen your point. "Does this routinely" was never implied. Read the very first post to what I replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:28 AM
1

There are lots of great resources to read about communication differences between men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 07:28 AM
1

She hasn't asked for over 20 years now, but it was never a problem with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:36 PM
1

Neither do I. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:32 PM
1

That's a weak version of an ad populum argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:31 PM
0

Yep, agreed. I actually need to research where "happiness", the term, comes from.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 06:30 PM
1

If he doesn't give me a time frame, then I have no idea when it's appropriate to start getting concerned, or even how to deal with practical concerns like 'is he going to be back on time for dinner?' So, still anxiety-ridden behaviour. "Getting concerned". Men and women may have different communication styles, but having different communication styles doesn't prevent you from saying more than 'out' and refusing when clarify further when asked to prevent your partner from being anxious. Who said …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:29 PM
1

"It's childish" -> Shaming. Not an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:12 PM
1

Maybe that person has no plans, then what?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:12 PM
1

Because men and women are different in many regards and communication is one of them. I'm not sure why it should be symmetrical.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:11 PM
1

No aspect of my upbringing could be described as 'helicopter parenting' and I still feel that way, as do most of the people I know. Even older couples tend to 'check in' on each other if they're breaking from routine, it's not an unreasonable or unusual request at all. "check in" doesn't mean "Is he going to get hit by a bus?". That's an anxiety-ridden behaviour. This just reads like a cop out to allow men a greater relative degree of freedom in how they spend their time than women. If men weren…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 01:21 PM
2

They are deeply rooted in victimism and it's very hard to get out of there, especially considering they don't have positive support around, not even from their parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 12:33 PM
2

If I don't know when to expect someone home or what they're going to be doing, I don't know when to start worrying about how long they're taking and when would be appropriate to alert people that they might be in trouble. If my partner says at 1700 'I'm going out for dinner with people from work and then going to the bar. I'll be back around 3am and probably won't respond to texts later in the night because I won't hear the phone' then I'm not going to worry. If my partner says at 1700 'I'm goi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 12:27 PM
2

Going out is fine, it is your right to do so, but it is not ok to stress your partner out and make them worry by not giving even a hint of when they can expect you back. This is akin to stressing because someone is taking more than 10 minutes to answer to a text. The teenager thing is just shaming, it doesn't hold any water as an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 12:24 PM
1

but if he said he was going 'out' with no other context I'd be worried because I wouldn't know when to expect him home and whether he was safe. Why wouldn't he be safe? Is your worry selfish or would you be really concerned about his safety? It's like the third answer in this reply that points at helicopter mother/wife. Have you actually lived with an SO before? The dynamic is completely different to when you're just dating because you have a much more pronounced a responsibility to each other. …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 11:18 AM
2

How is saying "out" disrespectful exactly? That's literally where he's going.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 11:17 AM
3

You wife is not your mother. Correct, so stop acting as such.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 09:57 AM
4

Very good post, related to what many have seen and experienced after Trump's victory. They (we) had to keep it to themselves because, with the current line of thought, supporting Trump is a bad thing. Don't risk social suicide for the sake of ego, for the sake of being right. Smile, nod, maybe risk it at pointing what the DNC did to Sanders, but nothing else. I know that sometimes the temptation is big, but this is, once again, short-term vs long-term satisfaction.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 08:23 AM
5

"Out" is a masculine response. "Here is a list of all the things I'm going to do" is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:17 AM
3

she would freak out because she is worried about me and loves me. I'm starting to see a pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:12 AM
9

Women are innately unhappy I'd argue that people are innately unhappy, mostly because of the fairy tales we hear when growing up. Feeling content and secure are more realistic goals with a lot less frustration involved.
/r/TheRedPill17/11/16 08:11 AM
1

Yeah, we are certainly past the breeding stage of mistrust. "Out" is not sarcasm. Out is literally where he's going, and without that distrust part, it leads to : Then I would say "ok he needs his alone time" and as long as you aren't gone for hours and hours, I would be happy. Without the need of extra explanations.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:50 AM
4

It breeds distrust. If you change the locks of the house because he uses a masculine way of communicating, I'd say the distrust is already past the stage of "breeding".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 06:25 AM
1

I totally agree with the core of the message, not with the delivery, that was my issue with it. I'd actually take your post and make it the OP of a new thread with the same topic at hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 08:34 PM
4

That's not a question, that's a passive-aggressive statement, hostile to people who are not the subject at matter, made to challenge BPers in one of their classic shaming attacks. Why not just challenge the shaming attack directly? Radicalizing the Romanceless talked about this anyways, with Barry and this battered ex-wives that kept coming back to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 08:44 AM
1

Meant to reply to the bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 08:43 AM
1

Yes, but I haven't known it to be very effective because people will argue about everything around it except about what is really at the core of it. EDIT : I deleted my post as I had replied to the wrong person.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/16 08:42 AM
2

Rosa Klebb was badass though.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 12:24 PM
1

Pissy? That's five already. Seems the problem here is with the painter, not with the brush or the painting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 10:50 AM
1

If you looked at my post history, you'd have seen that I talked recently with a MRA and I said I don't brand myself as anything. Being red-pilled is not the same as being a red-piller. I feel I'm skeptical of you and have good reason to believe that you wouldn't believe a sexual assault case, regardless. I see. We're at three failed generalizations/assumptions already? And no, if you're apart of the red pill Which I'm not, four. If she asked, what answer would she get? Again, maybe she was on so…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 10:11 PM
1

Based on being apart of the red pill and many things that have come from there (the blue pill has a whole post on it), I'm more likely to believe that you wouldn't believe a sexual assault case. I'm not part of anything. You're making me guilty by association of something that I don't believe that happens like that. I can see a red piller being skeptical of "I was drunk, I was raped" rape, but not as a whole. so it's not as if her experience is out of the ordinary. I'd believe it if we consider …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 03:12 PM
1

To be fair If that's being fair, I don't know how it'd sound if you were being unfair. It's not my job to believe, or not, sexual assault experiences as I'm not part of the judicial system. However, that one was posted right before a MRM congress, is filled with holes, non-believable behaviour from either of the two and includes a picture that doesn't correlate with the story being told. Are there guys who will try to overwhelm a woman during/after a date? Absolutely. Is that one of those cases?…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 02:37 PM
2

Then, it turns out that shit is real. The story, in the other hand, is not. It's a total caricature with lots of things to check from a list to make it as complete as possible, including the classic of conflating all the manosphere together. Link.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/16 09:32 AM
1

If you have any suggestions I'd be happy to discuss them. Again, screenshots. Maybe ask in asktrp.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 06:25 PM
1

The point is, ~250 girls found you attractive enough to sweep and, with whatever you opened or continued, you managed to turn them off, which points at very bad communication skills (not just game). What exactly you mean with "abstract" here?
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 06:16 PM
4

1/250 is a horrible ratio. With what exactly are you opening?
/r/TheRedPill13/11/16 06:05 PM
7

Police released these two e-fits of the men alleged to have carried out the offences men Hyperagency at work. From those portraits, they look like they are 12 years old.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 03:50 PM
3

I hear RP men saying that you can never be vulnerable to the woman you love. It's better to withhold affection and to avoid displays of emotion. I admit I'm not a Red Pill dogma expert (just red pilled in general), but I don't think that's the exact message. If you act like a robot, it's not going to work, no matter what. Even the toughest man is going to display affection and emotions towards his partner, in one way or another. What is important is the context and subtext. Is the man displaying…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 08:21 AM
13

I think that, if I can spot your political agenda from the way you word the questions, you've failed already.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/16 06:38 PM
8

I grew up with the belief that conservatives were idiots, that they all watched the local equivalent of Fox News and were brainwashed. That was a common belief around me. Now I'm in the office, wearing a t-shirt of Trump under my clothes, but I can't show it to anyone because then I may be risking being considered a total racist sexist whatever, when I'm not. European media has been largely against Trump and this has reflected on how people see him. If you think you have the moral ground, like I…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/16 09:50 AM
3

If I could vote, it'd be Trump, as it would be a huge "fuck you" for all media, American and European, that have turned their profession (or was it always like this?) into a total farce.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 04:26 PM
2

That doesn't mean he only attracts gold-diggers though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:56 PM
3

always and attracted nothing but gold diggers. [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:53 PM
1

How is Trump exactly hideous? He was a total Chad when he was on his 20s and looked fine while growing up. Now he's 70, so yeah, he's not that attractive anymore, but hideous?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 02:41 PM
0

Because he's not a man.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:44 AM
1

As a trans person, I can assure you its innate. No, you can't. Human development is at it strongest during the first three years of life, with things like personality being basically set. So I do believe that you felt that you were already not a girl at age 4, but it doesn't prove that it's innate.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:13 AM
1

Transwomen aren't transitioning to female because being a guy sucks; they're transitioning because of dysphoria What is causing this dysphoria? Let's put some things together as food for thought : The great majority of transitions are male to female (Topic starter) Masculinity, in the Western world, has been under attack for many years and right now I'd say its reputation is at its lowest ever. There are lots of very sexually frustrated and confused young men who are getting very discouraging me…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:55 AM
10

/u/thedabking123 also said : I've seen women who speak up or assert themselves in the office being called bitchy; a man doing the same would be called "alpha". About how many women have you heard that they may have a "Napoleon Complex"? That they are being assertive because they are overcompensating for something? People who don't have the respect of those around get mocked when they try to assert their dominance, men or women.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 02:38 PM
4

No, you should remain skeptical of any of those claims without further evidence. Considering what she's saying, there should be plenty of it (including documentation), so it's up to her to provide those. Until then, innocent until proven guilty. Said this, who didn't see this one coming? EDIT : C1307 and C557. Those are the cases open in the Chilean Justice System as reported by newspapers (this is not doxxing then, right?)
/r/MensRights27/10/16 07:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter