TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ShitLordXurious Archive

View 145 posts and 715 comments by ShitLordXurious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1023

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:28 PM
975

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights02/12/13 07:27 PM
927

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:51 PM
875

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:29 AM
780

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights12/09/13 11:03 AM
766

DiscriminationShitLordXurious/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:29 PM
743

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:28 PM
373

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:38 PM
358

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:13 PM
325

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights17/08/13 10:57 PM
261

ShitLordXurious/r/PussyPass10/11/14 09:55 PM
260

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:50 AM
256

re: FeminismShitLordXurious/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:56 AM
226

[Inaccurate or misleading title]ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:32 PM
190

Reverse GendersShitLordXurious/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:18 AM
184

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:34 PM
176

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:33 PM
171

DiscriminationShitLordXurious/r/MensRights06/06/15 11:37 PM
159

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights16/10/13 02:12 PM
148

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:30 PM
148

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:22 PM
146

re: FeminismShitLordXurious/r/MensRights19/11/14 11:14 PM
135

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:48 PM
130

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:10 PM
125

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights08/11/14 04:16 AM
124

DiscriminationShitLordXurious/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:07 PM
114

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights03/02/14 10:36 PM
96

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:17 PM
90

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:27 AM
87

re: FeminismShitLordXurious/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:50 PM
84

Activism/SupportShitLordXurious/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:45 PM
82

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights23/04/14 09:22 PM
81

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:08 PM
79

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:07 PM
78

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:03 PM
78

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:38 AM
77

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights28/03/14 09:49 PM
76

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:40 PM
76

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:09 PM
68

Blogs/VideoShitLordXurious/r/MensRights10/12/14 01:50 PM
68

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:31 PM
68

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights17/11/13 07:25 PM
66

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights21/08/13 12:16 AM
65

FeminismShitLordXurious/r/MensRights23/06/15 09:59 PM
63

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:23 PM
62

AnalysisShitLordXurious/r/MensRights01/04/15 05:16 PM
62

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:03 PM
58

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:54 PM
56

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:43 PM
54

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights28/03/14 07:54 PM
53

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:10 PM
51

GeneralShitLordXurious/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:27 PM
50

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights07/03/14 12:41 AM
50

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:00 PM
50

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:22 PM
47

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights06/01/14 04:32 PM
46

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights21/01/14 05:12 PM
45

FeminismShitLordXurious/r/MensRights22/02/15 03:12 AM
45

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:49 PM
44

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:11 PM
43

False AccusationsShitLordXurious/r/MensRights11/04/15 07:29 PM
43

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:31 PM
42

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights05/04/14 03:09 PM
42

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:06 PM
38

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights29/03/14 09:20 PM
36

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:07 AM
36

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:08 PM
36

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:38 AM
36

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:38 PM
35

Red Pill TheoryShitLordXurious/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 03:30 PM
35

Blogs/VideoShitLordXurious/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:27 PM
35

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights03/05/14 08:45 PM
33

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:53 AM
32

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:33 PM
32

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:27 AM
32

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:27 AM
31

OpinionShitLordXurious/r/MensRights16/12/14 09:58 PM
30

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:17 PM
29

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:32 PM
28

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:33 AM
28

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:59 AM
25

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights09/12/13 02:25 AM
25

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights28/12/13 06:38 PM
22

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights26/09/13 01:51 PM
20

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:34 PM
18

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:42 AM
18

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:18 PM
18

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights28/11/12 09:12 PM
17

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:24 AM
17

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:52 PM
16

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:54 PM
16

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:46 AM
15

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights07/04/14 08:58 PM
14

FeminismShitLordXurious/r/MensRights04/02/15 04:42 AM
13

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:29 PM
13

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:38 PM
13

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:40 PM
13

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:21 AM
13

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights26/08/14 08:40 PM
13

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:05 PM
12

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights23/02/13 07:32 PM
12

Red Pill TheoryShitLordXurious/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 04:31 PM
11

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights30/08/13 09:20 AM
11

NewsShitLordXurious/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:19 PM
10

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:32 PM
10

SatireShitLordXurious/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:00 AM
10

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights13/10/14 10:52 AM
9

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights08/01/14 02:47 AM
9

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights25/03/14 12:56 AM
9

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:04 PM
9

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:53 PM
9

Men's Rights NewsShitLordXurious/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:50 PM
9

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights23/10/13 12:37 PM
9

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:06 PM
8

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:45 AM
8

Red Pill TheoryShitLordXurious/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 07:10 PM
8

Men's Rights NewsShitLordXurious/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:20 PM
7

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:14 AM
7

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights31/12/12 08:55 AM
7

FeminismShitLordXurious/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:06 PM
6

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights21/08/13 02:23 AM
6

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:10 PM
6

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:27 PM
4

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:16 PM
4

Raising AwarenessShitLordXurious/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:52 AM
4

OpinionShitLordXurious/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:47 AM
4

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights07/01/13 12:38 PM
4

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights04/01/14 09:43 PM
4

DiscussionShitLordXurious/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:57 PM
3

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:58 AM
2

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights22/03/14 07:43 PM
2

Blue Pill ExampleShitLordXurious/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 10:39 PM
2

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights03/12/12 03:29 AM
2

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:41 AM
2

Reverse GendersShitLordXurious/r/MensRights17/10/14 09:48 PM
1

Red Pill TheoryShitLordXurious/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 10:19 AM
1

DiscussionShitLordXurious/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:04 PM
1

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:26 PM
1

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:27 PM
1

re: FeminismShitLordXurious/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:34 PM
1

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:47 PM
1

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:20 PM
1

ShitLordXurious/r/PussyPass12/05/15 03:35 PM
0

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:19 AM
0

ShitLordXurious/r/MensRights01/10/14 12:48 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

The BBC is disgusting, and should be scrapped.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 09:40 PM
4

Feminism is the preoccupation of privileged women, that's why. Like spoiled children, they only ever ask for more, and don't think about those who have less than them - the women suffering in Muslim countries are only ever used as justication for increased privileges for women in affluent western countries.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:02 PM
22

You can't win with people that have built their entire world view on manufacturing a victim mentality for themselves.
/r/PussyPass05/05/15 04:09 PM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 01:26 PM
8

My sentiments exactly.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 02:07 AM
9

That's not the point. The point is that this makes feminists look bad.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 11:58 PM
1

Another obvious troll account! "ShhRP", lol.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 11:59 PM
10

It's a medical fact. I'm surprised anyone is contending it - it could mean the difference between life and death, in an extreme situation.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 10:54 PM
1

Sea water is too concentrated. Edits: Here is the UK National Health Service web page on treating dehydration.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 10:46 PM
5

No, you lose salt when you become dehydrated. Replacing salt is essential if you need to rehydrate quickly. NHS website on treating dehydration.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 10:27 PM
2

I find taking salt with water when I'm dehydrated works far better than just drinking water on its own. I know I read a study recently that showed athletes rehydrated better when given salt tablet and water.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 10:23 PM
46

Salt can help you absorb and retain water - ideally you want both.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 09:33 PM
40

Sorry to be that guy, but eating salt and vinegar crisps might not be such a bad idea in the desert. In the desert you lose a lot of salt due to dehydration, and can become salt depleted; also, the small amount of carbs in the potatoes will break down into sugar and water as you metabolise it which will help sustain you.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 08:44 PM
1

I contend that we (on the left) should adopt a more equitable stake. This will never happen. It would be like suggesting to the National Rifle Association that they should also campaign for outlawing gun ownership, as well as campaigning for gun ownership. Being feminist - and seeing men as the problem that causes women's issues - is in the left's DNA. You haven't realised that yet.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:46 PM
1

I guess what it comes down to is, as flawed as the current system has been and is, I continue to trust it to a liberal/progressive ideology I think you'll find you've tied your shoelaces together before you've even started running. The problem with leftism - of which progressivism is a part - is that it is built in the idea that society is built of groups of the oppressors and the oppressed. For feminists (part of progressivism and leftism) the oppressed group is women, and the oppressing group …
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:33 PM
2

Part of the problem you are not seeing is that a large number of men's issues - particularly with regard to family law - are caused by the state, and its adoption of "progressive" policies. Statist "progressive" parties will never represent men.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:11 PM
4

Indeed. No right thinking male should support Labour, Green, or Lib Dems in this upcoming election. But some men have yet to realise that.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:53 PM
2

Universities have become Marxist enclaves.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:09 PM
1

Should be reposted to r/nottheonion
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:29 PM
3

I'm saying she is by no means a typical feminist.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:23 PM
7

Feminists consider Christina Hoff Sommers an anti-feminist though. She is the exception the proves the rule.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:09 PM
7

Sony announced that on international women's day? lol, that's funny. Sony be trollin'.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 07:51 PM
1

Still not a common household item. I've kept my own house clean and tidy for years. I've never needed anything stronger than bleach.
/r/PussyPass28/03/15 02:03 AM
1

Do you keep sulphuric acid in your house?
/r/PussyPass28/03/15 12:57 AM
1

That's still not a very usual household product for the UK.
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 06:50 PM
-2

My thoughts exactly. Why does this crazy woman have acid in her house? Isn't that a bit of a give away, that she has long term evil intentions?
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 06:45 PM
-1

Where the hell do these crazy women get their acid from? Nobody I know keeps acid just lying around in he house. That's not normal behaviour.
/r/PussyPass27/03/15 06:45 PM
9

If she'd been more attractive, the judge might have given her a lighter sentence...
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:22 PM
41

That's how the hamster runs...
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:21 PM
1

Oh really? I hope I was saying sensible things... (I don't always say sensible things)
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:32 AM
1

Oh interesting.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 12:02 AM
3

Here's one.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 05:02 PM
1

Really? Are you doing a project on this subject?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:51 PM
1

Why comment on a post from 4 months ago?
/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:17 AM
2

Old news is old.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:11 AM
1

Do you? I do not. I think we need to put sociopaths down to eliminate whatever genes create them from the gene pool.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 07:30 PM
2

That doesn't mean you should feel sorry for her btw.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:13 PM
4

She's clearly a sociopath.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:00 PM
26

Reverse genders, and this would be all over Twitter. Feminists would point to this as an example of patriarchal mysogyny, and blog about it for weeks, like Eliot Rogers.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 02:20 AM
1

I see. My comment about being too blue pill to notice was meant to be directed at OP, I temporarily forgot how reddit works, so it seemed like I was saying it to you... The Guardian has always been very misandrist and pro-feminist, but it only seems to have become apparent to people as the MRM has grown stronger, and feminist mouthpieces like the Graun have had to start battening down the hatches in order to maintain control of the entire gender narrative. Feminism has always been misandrist and…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:37 PM
1

Who is Amanda Marcotte? Surely she can't be any worse than long standing Guardian regulars Julie Bindel or Suzanne Moore? The Guardian has always been very misandrist. Take a look at radical feminist lesbian Julie Bindel's piece entitled "Why I Hate Men" from way back in 2006. Or the piece from the Guardian's "women's editor" Kira Cochrane entitled "Are All Men Rapists After All" (she concludes they are) from way back in 2005. Guardian was always misandrist, you were perhaps too blue pill to not…
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:12 PM
2

Guardian has always been misandrist (despite what some here are saying) Here is radical feminist Julie Bindel's piece entitled "Why I Hate Men" which dates back to 2006 - 9 years ago.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 03:09 PM
24

You made that account for me personally? I'm touched.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:58 AM
22

This must be a joke account, surely.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:38 AM
28

"1,500 terrorists, including 3 women".
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:38 AM
5

I see sob stories in the media, and talk show appearances where they repent, talk about how horrible ISIS is, and how we one need to "trust our leaders" to bomb the crap out of them.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:37 AM
18

The feminist agenda has come full circle and is now actively promoting dangerous behavior that could be harmful to women, simply in the name of male shaming. Feminists aren't actually interested in ending rape; they are interested in using rape as a means to further their left wing agenda. The more rapes there are, the more the movement gains - so promoting dangerous behaviour is actually to their advantage
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 09:27 PM
1

The entire purpose of this is not to save women's lives, but to use women's deaths to push the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:46 PM
1

"Britain has a chance to flourish if it leaves the European Union and would be better off outside the 28-nation bloc if policymakers fail to renegotiate the country’s position within it, according to the head of the British Chambers of Commerce." This is a direct quote from the article. You are weirdly trying to twist things as if to say the opposite is true, and as if the director of the BCC didn't say that. But he did. Do you not understand the words?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:58 PM
1

"Britain has a chance to flourish if it leaves the European Union and would be better off outside the 28-nation bloc if policymakers fail to renegotiate the country’s position within it, according to the head of the British Chambers of Commerce." That's the quote, from the article regarding the director of the British Chamber of Commerce's view of the UK's relationship with the failing EU. Seems you didn't read the article.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:40 PM
1

vast majority of people who's job it is to track economic performance and growth disagree with your assessmet of the EU Not at all - the financial advisors I know have recommended steering clear of any investments in the Eurozone. The Greek elections have just made everything worse. There is plenty of information to back up what I am saying, you can look it up. FYI, the director of the British Chamber of Commerce has spoken favourably of UK exit from the EU - a position which makes complete sens…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 07:15 PM
1

I speak as an investor - which is one of my sources of income, being self employed. Only an imbecile would invest in the Eurozone at the moment, due to the risks - most people concede things are set to get worse; the current predicted growth is not due to improvements in the general economic situation within the EU, which remains dire, but because of cheaper fuel prices and quantitative easing. There is ample reason to predict the UK will fair better outside of the EU - look at Iceland as an exa…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:51 PM
1

Your link describes forecast growth in the EU - it doesn't talk about actual growth. The EU is shrinking economically, and the Greek situation makes the debt situation even more volatile. Economically, the EU has been an absolute disaster. We are lucky not to have joined the Euro, or we would be being dragged down too.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:35 PM
5

That last question - oh shit! If she gets a question wrong like that, does she lose all the money she had built up (as in "who wants to be a millionaire")? In which case, did she do all that for nothing? Haha!
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:08 PM
2

Wanting to leave the EU? Its economically stupid. Erm, do you know anything about what's going on in the EU at the moment? It's a black hole of debt, with no economic growth!
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:58 PM
2

I'm a UKIP member - try me. Which of their policies do you disagree with?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:15 PM
2

UKIP has lots of great qualities, you just haven't looked into it, and listen to what their political opponents say about them instead.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:53 PM
8

If you are in the UK, are aware of men's issues, and still support Labour, you'd have to be insane.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:45 PM
2

What are you, a Labour voter?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:10 PM
3

When was the last time you saw a video about the male suicide rate? But #likeagirl is apparently a catastrophe for young women's self esteem. One of the reasons society has so little time for men's issues is because the entire gender narrative is dominated by feminists championing every minute phenomenon that effects women.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:07 PM
4

Don't think you understood the video. Perpetuating a narrative of false grievances against men is harmful to men, and makes raising awareness of real problems that effect men - 75% suicide rate, low education performance, longer prison sentences for same crime, increased likelihood to end up in prison, increased likelihood to end up homeless, three times more likely to be victims of violent crime, 97% work death rate - even harder to address. Given that men are three times more likely to commit …
/r/MensRights04/02/15 06:19 PM
0

What's the relevance of this?
/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:54 PM
26

The more spoiled, bratty and entitled women get, the more they need feminism, it seems, to justify their excessive and irrational demands for more.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 05:45 PM
1

Be bright: vote Right!
/r/PussyPass27/01/15 05:48 PM
12

Men account for over 90% of the prison population, and receiver 60% longer sentences for the same crimes. Prison is one example of institutional bias against men - and yet feminists have successfully lobbied to make that bias worse. It demonstrates that feminism is absolutely nothing to do with "equality" as all feminists claim.
/r/PussyPass27/01/15 05:44 AM
26

This is a direct result of feminist action. The largest feminist campaign group in the UK, The Fawcett Society, put together "the women's justice task force" that put forward the case that all women's prison should close. They lobbied government, and the matter was taken seriously enough by UK politicians that it was debated in the parliamentary select committee. The idea was (thankfully) thrown out by conservative politicians, however the more left wing Scottish Parliament took the ideas on boa…
/r/PussyPass26/01/15 05:25 PM
1

Yes, it is pretty simple, once you see it. There seem to be so many people criticising me for saying this though, I don't understand. I was starting to wonder if we'd been raided by TwoX or something!
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 09:37 PM
0

No pictures of Hugh Hefner for instance, even though he obviously gets pussy Your mentioning of rich, famous men who are still able to score beautiful women actually proves my hypothesis.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 09:14 PM
2

In fact, if you look at gay guys (and their porn), their ideas of attraction are almost always generic and predictable compared to women. They are, after all, men and subject to the same rigid ideas of what is "fuckable". Yep, this is kind of my point - why I made the post. My observation is that Cumberbatch is not a sexy looking guy, but females particularly are obsessed with the guy - there is even a large female specific sub dedicated to him, r/cumberbitches. As for Bjork, she is attractive -…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 09:12 PM
-2

I'm bi, I can tell when a man is physically attractive. Maybe I should have put that in my OP.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 08:57 PM
11

You are the same height as Tom Cruise, and he gets plenty of female attention. So just be Tom Cruise.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 08:42 PM
-1

A square jawline is a sign of high testosterone, not a pointy narrow one like Cumberbatch.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 08:15 PM
0

What you'll again see on /r/LadyBoners is posts of men when they're in their prime. That sub is full of pictures of famous succesful men.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 08:00 PM
-1

I'm bi, and he gives me no tingles. That's part of what inspired this post. I don't get the current obsession.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 07:53 PM
-2

To some extent, but fame, status and wealth have a huge hand to play. I saw a similar obsession happen in the 90s with Kevin Spacey. For a time he was everywhere, and women were gushing. Then his star was eclipsed, and they all seemed to forget. Similarly, certain musicians follow a similar fame arc. I, for one, didn't think any of the Beatles were particularly attractive, yet girls were screaming over them, and throwing themselves into their beds. Women, as a group, get uniquely fixated on cert…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 07:52 PM
-3

Yeah, he's a strange looking man. I think it's an interesting reflection of female perceptions of attractiveness, which are no more or less "shallow" than male ones, merely driven by different sexual agendas. hamsters spinning about looks not mattering as long as there's a pay out. What I find particularly fascinating though, is how women are convincing themselves that he is good looking - there are Tumblr pages devoted to pictures of the guy. Their giny tingles, created by his fame, wealth, and…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/15 07:30 PM
2

Harman is a useless politician. She'd lose an argument with a paper bag. If it wasn't for the female affirmative action that SHE put in place in the UK Labour Party, ensuring her position as deputy leader, she wouldn't have a job.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:51 PM
2

Total respect to her.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:10 AM
13

Feminist writer blames X on men and says it's sexism against women. Substitute almost any female related subject for X, and you've got a feminist talking point.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:33 AM
12

That's exactly what I think happens. On some level they know they aren't being completely honest with themselves, and that their beliefs are flawed, so react completely irrationally when challenged.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:02 AM
34

The one thing feminists can never handle, is dissent. They just go insane, and project pure hatred. I think everybody in this sub has experienced that at some point.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:05 AM
28

Wtf is wrong with these people? Are they all brain damaged?
/r/PussyPass05/01/15 05:25 PM
10

Yes, hundreds.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 02:00 AM
0

10 years immunity is a pretty good run though.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 11:23 PM
1

It's called "new gunner girls" - do a search for it.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 08:25 PM
15

Indeed. I've just been "discussing" the Rotherham incidents with some butthurt SJWs in r/subredditdrama. Apparently, to them, rape is everywhere in the UK, because of our "atrocious" rape culture, EXCEPT in the muslim community (the only place one could argue that it actually exists). When it comes to Rotherham, SJWs are all excuses, and even complete denial that anything even happened - "what muslim rape gangs?" So for any wannabe rapists that actually read this sub, there is now a proven metho…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 08:19 PM
1

Really? Or is that a joke?
/r/MensRights19/12/14 04:18 AM
10

Feminists call her an anti-feminist. She is roundly rejected by the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 10:47 PM
23

Uk dweller here - that programme is beyond appalling, and it's sickening that we are forced to pay for that outrageous feminist propaganda produced by the BBC - the tax funded state media service. The "red pill libertarian type" guy is James Delingpole, an excellent journalist. He was stunned by his experience on the BBC "free speech" TV programme, and had this to say about it This Video completely takes apart the bullshit put forward in that abysmal BBC programme.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 10:35 PM
1

It's a bit of both - pandering to state dependent voters, and destroying the traditional family for ideological reasons. There have always been those on the left that saw the nuclear family as one of the building blocks of the "social relations" that constitute "capitalism", so they see destroying the family as an aspect of destroying capitalism, in order to build their imaginary utopia where everyone is equal. In Cambodia, under the Marxist dictator Pol Pot, family was destroyed competely, and …
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 05:05 PM
1

Indeed. Of not for the fast breeding chavs and immigrants, the UK population would be stable - meaning all these problems with high unemployment, high house prices, over crowded schools, and over crowded hospitals would not be happening.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 04:26 PM
6

Really? Don't know that. I'm not that surprised - it really seems the state,with the help of the political Left, have been actively encouraging this behaviour for decades. The Left doesn't like healthy independent people or families; it likes dysfunctional confused people that are dependent on the state - so what better way to do this than by destroying the family, by rewarding female promiscuity and maternal irresponsibility, whilst simultaneously destroying the concept of fatherhood (and mascu…
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 05:17 AM
7

Indeed. There are entire estates full of chav single mums, and they are outbreeding the rest of the population fast, because having a child means a meal ticket for life, and each state dependent generation learns from the previous one. And many of them see absolutely no shame in that way of living - some of them a fiercly defiant; they think it's their "right". They are raising essentially feral children, who have never experienced normal family life or a self sustaining family unit, who simply …
/r/TheRedPill14/12/14 12:21 AM
16

Over here in the UK, the sluts get themselves pregnant then live off the genorisity of the state. Single motherhood has become the norm for the under 30 generation. All the sluts I knew from my college days now have kids, usually several from different dads.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 08:35 PM
14

Ultimate get rich scheme.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:43 PM
229

Feminism in a nut shell.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:42 PM
11

The strange thing is, female dominatrixes see this as an attack on them. Particularly the part about face sitting. I'm from the UK, and think the whole thing is totally fucked up, and I have no idea how the government drew these stupid conclusions.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 06:44 PM
13

Strange, I thought that analysis had been done. And it's not piss. Now I'm gong to have to dig around to find that article again.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 06:41 PM
4

Yes, they are.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:35 PM
31

Propaganda is more important to them than truth.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:31 PM
3

Really? I checked his account, and can't see that.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/14 06:32 PM
1

I think you should look at first wave feminism again, and see past the feminist historical revisionism to make them look like heroes.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:49 PM
1

Nonsense. Vote UKIP, they support equal rights for fathers.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:47 PM
0

You should watch this.. Basically, women aren't suited to engineering, it's essentially proven at this point.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:51 AM
0

By the same logic you just used men are bad at nursing and teaching, because they are women dominated fields. "Men just don't have the brains for it!". I'm pretty sure a lot of men would have beef with that. I don't have a beef with this. There is ample evidence of brain differences between men and women, you just have your head in the sand about them.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:37 AM
1

STEM is only a boys club because girls don't enjoy hardcore nerd stuff. They don't really have the brains for it. I studied a STEM field in my 20s. 5 females in a class of 100. And they were all thick compared to the males, real dummies.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:12 AM
1

You think Dr Matt Taylor Hates women, because shirt. I remember enough to know you're a dimwit.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:45 PM
1

Oh was that you I said that to? I forgot. You're still an idiot though, vagina or no.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:02 PM
1

You want to be taken seriously, and still be a whiney bitch? Oh course you do. But you can only choose one.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:34 PM
1

Anytime. Even real woman's rights activists call you idiotic! :)
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:01 PM
3

No right thinking UK male that has a even passing knowledge of men's issues should vote labour.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:53 PM
1

Well, I think you're stupid, and so do lots of other people.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:51 PM
1

So what should that scientist have worn? That's the real question. Everyone else was dressed informal clothing, so was he. The other scientists didn't care about his shirt - or they would have told him, to his face. The only people offended by it were the Twitter mob of SJWs.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:28 PM
1

You just make points that a female would make. "It's not what you said, it's the way you said it." "It's not what he wore, it's when he wore it."
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:30 AM
1

Are you feeeeeeeeeemale?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:18 AM
1

You sound like a woman.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:11 AM
1

The shirt was made by a woman. So maybe those sexualised women are the "empowered" kind that you get on slutwalks, rather than the "objectified" kind you get in men's magazines? /s
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:11 AM
2

Oh shit, then I am a rapist, just like the radfems always said!! /s
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:09 AM
2

Nope. I survived the experience though. I just thought they were badly behaved women. I'm not sure they deserved to be deported though. Women get away with stuff like that all the time, is my point.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:08 AM
2

I've had women grab my dick in pubs. Was I sexually assaulted????
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:03 AM
2

But he didn't have a criminal conviction, for anything. Are you sure he really promoted this things, or were some choice quotes taken out of context for dramatic effect by SJWS?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:29 PM
3

But was it misogyny? Was his choice of shirt an expression of hatred?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:27 PM
1

Is finding women attractive misogyny?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:31 PM
19

My thoughts exactly. That account is like a caricature! "Women only have massively favourable treatment because they don't get enough massively favourable treatment!"
/r/PussyPass21/11/14 07:31 PM
2

Indeed, and feminists make up new "rights" as they go along. At one time birth control did not exist, until men invented it. Now, feminists say free birth control is a "right"! What new "rights" are gong to be invented in future, that feminists say they are entitled to free of charge?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:28 PM
24

Women are treated favourably in the criminal justice system. Vastly so - they receive 63% shorter sentences for the same crimes as men, and feminists have campaigned to make those sentences even shorter, and even to close women's prisons completely!
/r/PussyPass21/11/14 07:15 PM
25

Sure, but feminists are the first to oppose any kind of equal treatment of females in the criminal justice system.
/r/PussyPass21/11/14 07:03 PM
0

No, it really is linked to the left. Feminists say they are pursuing equality, but they have a warped notion of what it is. In my opinion, the same is true of most on the Left - "equality" is about advantaging groups that they define as "disadvantaged", with diversity quotas and affirmative action. That is not equality, that is special treatment for special people. Feminists are exactly the same, which is why their ideas gel so well with the left.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:46 PM
3

Second wave Feminism is gendered Marxism. "Bourgeois oppressors", "working class oppressed", "destroy capitalism" became "Men oppressors", "women oppressed", "smash the patriarchy". Early Secind wave feminists were radical Marxists, and took those attitudes and styles of language into Feminism. Since that era, Feminism intrinsically linked to the Left.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:34 AM
9

Feminists take criticism of their movement as proof their movement needs to exist. They really follow arguments as stupid and circular as that.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:28 AM
2

The ideals of feminism are not those of humanism. Humanism is a form of egalitarianism, while feminism - which claims to be about "equality" - is in fact a movement to advantage women in all circumstances, even ones in which they are already advantaged, compared to men (such as feminist moves to reduce the number of women in prison, even though women make up less than 7% of the prison population).
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:36 AM
7

The Fawcett society is the group behind the incentive to close all women's prisons in the UK.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:01 PM
1

What is the point of that "Honest Deception" video? Is it meant to be ironic, or taken at face value? What is it?
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 10:26 PM
8

We live in a culture in which adult women get away with behaving like children, and men don't get away with anything. And women still think they are "oppressed".
/r/MensRights14/11/14 09:37 PM
27

Ironically, his female friend made the shirt for him. It's a one of a kind, and he was probaboy wearing it as a tribute to her. She is horrified over what has happened, of course.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 07:40 PM
2

Feminism has no stated end goal. They will keep pushing no matter what, even far passed the point of "equality".
/r/PussyPass11/11/14 06:39 PM
18

They are part of the Fawcett Society - the biggest and longest standing feminist advocacy group in the UK. They are the people that make the "this is what a feminist looks like" tshirts. Here is one of their recent reports aimed at influencing parliamentarians who are the policy makes in the UK. The part about women's prisons is on page 22. http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Fawcett-Society-What-About-Women-report-low-res.pdf
/r/PussyPass11/11/14 03:33 AM
2

I get it that this is a circlejerk sub, but c'mon, let's be realistic. Realistically, if white knight had focussed on keeping her away from him, she would never have got that opportunity to kick him, and he wouldn't have retaliated by knocking her out. He would have prevented the violence confrontation by dealing with the aggressor. As it happens he made the wrong choice, and we all enjoyed the consequences! :)
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/14 12:19 AM
3

How about just prevent the aggressor?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/14 10:40 PM
24

Idiot. While the white knight's back is turned, she could be picking up a weapon, as I mentioned before - picking up a glass, breaking a bottle, or pulling out a knife.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/14 09:51 PM
23

Drunk women do the most dangerous shìt, and usually get away with it. Example - drunk women smashes broken glass into mans face, receieves no jail, despite being 18th violent conviction. Smell the pussypass.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/14 09:48 PM
36

and he knows that the cunt can't do much more than slap and claw or throw some shitty kicks. No he doesn't know that, he just assumes it. While his back is turned, she could be picking up a chair, breaking a bottle, or pulling out a knife. Just because she is female doesn't mean she cannot inflict terrible damage.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/14 08:17 PM
55

She was trying to kick him in the balls.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/14 07:54 PM
2

Kudos to you - women like you restore my faith in the female gender.
/r/PussyPass09/11/14 11:42 PM
2

Not really. The part on women's prisons and justification for their closure (or reduction) is actually very small. I can copy and paste it. It follows below. Why reduce the number of women in prison? Each year it is estimated that more than 17,700 children are separated from their mother by imprisonment. Nearly all have to leave home as well as losing their mother – just 5% of women prisoners’ children remain in their own home after their mother goes to prison.99 Women offenders are often also v…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:41 PM
3

Sure, if you listen to The Fawcett Society, it will seem like they make a fair and reasonable case. Never mind that their research and outlook are completely biased towards women, and if they were genuinely concerned about equality, they would be looking at ways to reduce the male population to levels that resemble female ones (men receive 60% longer sentences for the same crimes as women - Fawcett don't seem to care about that). Take a look at their report, women's prisons is on page 22.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:09 PM
3

The Fawcett Society is one of the biggest and longest standing feminist advocacy groups in the UK. They are by no means "crazy fringe feminism" - they are absolutely mainstream. Their proposals to shut women's prisons were discussed in Parliament, and they frequently appear on the BBC. Shutting women's prisons and giving women more lenient treatment in the justice system is not fringe feminism, it's mainstream.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:57 PM
5

And what have those feminists done to prevent the actions of professional politically active feminists, like this Feminist Professor or the Fawcett Society? Nothing. In fact, they probably support groups like the Fawcett Society, believing they stand for "equality".
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:52 PM
3

That means that the most prominent feminist advocacy group in the UK, and perhaps even the world, is pretty terrible at feminism. Or it could just be that feminism is pretty terrible, and you are only just starting to even notice.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 08:34 PM
2

Indeed. Feminism is not about "equality" and it never was - it's always been about expanding female privilege. They don't want the same obligations as men, or the same accountability, they want all the rights, but none of the responsibility.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:43 PM
6

She's not even the first feminist to suggest closing women's prisons. In the UK, the Fawcett Society - the biggest and oldest feminist campaign group in the UK, who famously created the "this is what a feminist looks like" t-shirt - began the campaign to close all women's prisons. They put together "the women's justice task force" and created a dossier to support the position, which managed to reach the highest levels of government, with the support of many female Members of Parliament. Scotland…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:27 PM
1

I don't think males are more sexist than ever, I think women's complaints have been accommodated to so much that every minor female discomfort is given huge importance. It's "the princess and the pea" scenario - the more comfortable one made the princess, the more she complained; no level of comfort was enough, she always needed more. Complaining is in women's nature, and when those complaints are given political, legal and social importance, this is were we end up; the most entitled bunch of wh…
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:21 PM
8

Indeed, that is the essence of feminism. Even if women are objectively advantage compared to men, they are still victims.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:03 PM
8

On the contrary, she's a professional feminist.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:55 PM
3

It has indeed got crazier.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 04:23 AM
2

Did you not see the feminist viral video "10 hours walking in New York"?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:06 PM
1

Indeed. Some feminists want to ban urinals..
/r/MensRights02/11/14 07:59 PM
2

Many women had more rights and power than the vast majority of men. Therefore, women were not an "oppressed class". Oppressed classes don't get to rule nations.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:25 PM
-1

There were an equal number of aristocratic men. Therefore, that overrides the "entire point" of patriarchy theory - there were as many women in the ruling class as men; women were never an "oppressed class".
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:18 PM
6

This is a nice picture of the kind of feminism that stole a movement from the suffragettes, it's for upper class mainstream women in first world countries. The suffragettes were upper class women from first world countries! The movement wasn't stolen from them - it has always been this way!
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:04 PM
1

Nothing male is sacred to them. Everything male has to be infiltrated and subverted to support female interest. But female spaces are sacred, and must not be tainted with male presence or involvement.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:58 PM
-1

Aristocratic women were an "oppressed class"? More so than the peasant class males who were forced to work and die for them? I don't agree with that.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 04:56 PM
1

Why did this post get removed?
/r/TheRedPill02/11/14 03:47 AM
1

Cheers brah.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:58 AM
1

A mod actually deleted this post earlier, believing this to be satire! I had to provide links to other sources, showing that these feminists are for real.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 11:28 PM
1

Don't try to reason with feminists. Just laugh at them.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:48 PM
1

Because they are oppressed. /s
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:22 PM
3

Here's a list of female rulers and monarchs.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:21 PM
6

So because what, 0,01% of women in pre-feminist History had power no oppression has ever existed? The fact that women were able to hold the higest positions of power attainable, disproves the idea that women are an oppressed class. That's not to say oppressed classes didn't exist - just that women were not one. Aristocratic females had many, many times more advantages in life, than the much larger group of lower class males, that were sent to their deaths in vast numbers to protect the interstes…
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:15 PM
4

Someone should message her, tell her that he is internet savvy and can get the link taken down of she tells him the URL, then share the link, for the benefit of all mankind.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 08:50 PM
1

This is actually a bit of a shit article. Perhaps I shouldn't have posted it.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:40 PM
1

Shit, I didn't read that bit.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:38 PM
1

I don't follow.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:38 PM
19

"Facing adversity" is just part of life, and does not mean one is part of an "oppressed group". I don't deny that women have issues specific to their sex, just as men have issues specific to their sex - what I disagree with is the feminist narrative that we live in a "patriarchy" in which men are universally "privileged", and women are universally "oppressed". Feminists do subscribe to that view, and use it as a means to ridiculue any awareness of men's issues. That's why feminism is a problem.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:25 PM
1

Yeah. It was posted on a different men's right bulletin board. I shared it here.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 07:14 PM
1

I thought it was an interesting discussion point. Is feminism really dying, or is it stronger than ever?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 05:47 PM
11

Was sarcasm. I was parodying how feminists think. And by the way, most feminists think feminism=women.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:50 PM
12

I used to think that. But once you understand the core values of feminism, it becomes absolutely moronic. Even the most talented feminists are explicitly intellectually dishonest in order to make their arguments. The central feminist idea - that women were and are an "oppressed class" being oppressed by men, who are the privileged class - is absurd, given that many women throughout history have been queens and emperors, who sent male subjects to their deaths in vast number in wars, and had many …
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:35 PM
11

Whenever any woman doesn't get what she wants she is being "oppressed" and you are a "misogynist" for not agreeing with her. /s
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:30 PM
-4

Indeed. They are morons. They are feminists. The two are absolutely synonymous.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:07 PM
5

Nobody in this thread has said she was a brazen attention whore, or any other kind of whore. It'd be offensive.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:20 PM
1

Brilliant article.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:16 PM
5

What is "winning" though? In an evolutionary sense, it's having offspring - and not just any offspring, sexually successful ones. So the true winners of red pill are fathers that raise red pill sons (and/or daughters). That's a huge investment, and having children has become such a minefield in modern culture that it's likely to destroy you as a man. This is how feminism has killed the true alpha male - by obliterating men's right to have a family and be a father; that was the true meaning of "p…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 12:36 AM
0

Women aren't logical. They will argue contradictory positions if it's to their advantage. The fact feminists do this is only because feminism is an example of female self-centred thinking.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 12:25 AM
-1

Women hate it when you don't give them attention. But they think it's okay when they decide to ignore you. It's an aspect of what you might call "female privilege" - the belief that the world revolves around them; female solipsism and narcissism. It's another form of gynocentism, the foundation of feminism.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:56 PM
-1

Haven't you experienced something similar to this when not replying to a female's text, for whatever reason? I certainly have.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:43 PM
1

No it isn't.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:26 AM
2

Second wave feminism emerged out of hard left Marxist movements. That's a fact.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:44 PM
1

Feminism has always been an massive part of leftism, especially since the 1940s onwards.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 07:22 PM
0

There is a left wing agenda at work, for certain.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 06:11 PM
1

It's feminist damselling yet again - invent a story that women are being victimised, then demand retribution. It's the same basic principle as a false rape accusation - claim to be a victim, and demand revenge. This is feminine evil in action; this is how women attack - not through the overt use of force, but by claiming to be victims, and asking others to commit violence on their behalf, or to compensate them for alleged damage.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 09:54 AM
1

Who is this lady that owns part of BMW?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 10:55 AM
1

I gave up trying to debate with feminists years ago. You cannot argue with those who have renounced the use of reason. Feminism is simply a dangerous political cult.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 10:06 PM
9

Why can't feminists accept women do shitty things. Because feminism is itself full of shitty women doing shitty things, creating victim narratives, damselling and claiming they are being abused (by the patriarchy) so need rescuing by "good" (female subservient) men, and making up false statistics that manipulate public perceptions so as to paint men as evil, women as good, and further portray women as innocent hypoagents in a world out to get them. The shitty "feminine evil" qualities portrayed …
/r/MensRights06/10/14 08:01 PM
1

Reddit SJCs are always judging me be my comment history! Why???!?! /s
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 12:12 PM
-9

This is old news.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:45 PM
1

And a legion of feminists to defend her.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:53 PM
214

But women are dishonest and manipulative all the time. What they hate is exposure.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 02:48 PM
1

They could also have mentioned the utterly failed attempt to raise a biological male as a female, a disastrous experiment that ought to have been the nail in the coffin of socialised gender theories. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 02:33 PM
13

What struck me about this, is how the female presenter claimed all the differences were just socialised, while looking dressing, and acting like a typical female. If she was such a believer that social conformity is responsible for the differences, then why does she still insist on socially conforming? Surely she should be breaking every mould, and striking a new path away from the rest of the female herd? But no, she still chooses the conformist path, as is in her nature, and then also to lie t…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 02:27 PM
1

Feminism isn't based on "history". It's all conjecture. It isn't based on anything solid. Any research feminist do is to prove things they already believe - and they have been shown to be quite happy to commit academic fraud in order to do this. At best, you might say feminism is base on a particular interpretation of history - i.e. it's a story about a story, with lots of bias and embellishment, to suit a female self-interested narrative.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 10:57 PM
2

Does TRP have any goals? It's not so much a movement as a philosophy or an outlook.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 10:47 PM
1

They are totally wrong about UKIP, but then those freaks are wrong about almost everything.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 09:31 PM
1

For sure, to identify with being a "victim" is a psychological trap, from which there is no escape. But feminists use the identity of "victim" as a weapon. Just as false accusers of rape pretend they are victims of male sexual aggression in order to attack a particular man, feminists have constructed an entire narrative that claims ALL women are victims of male sexual aggression (patriarchy theory) in order to attack all men. Patriarchy theory is itself a colossal false rape accusation, created …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 07:31 PM
8

What was your "wing man game"?
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 07:27 PM
1

I know, she's disgusting, but at least the truth came out for a moment!
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 07:26 PM
1

Yeah, it all just came out at once though. Maybe I should write it up properly as a more detailed post, with examples.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 07:15 PM
1

For sure, evolution is not the be all and end all of survival. Luck has a hand. But my point was that evolutionary psychology goes a long way to confirm some redpill truths regarding female vs male nature. I read the book "sperm wars" some years ago. It explains how aspects of female biology interact with female sexual strategy, resulting many of the female behaviour patterns we observe and discuss. One important piece of information regarded how female menstrual cycles are set up to confuse pot…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 07:12 PM
1

Funny. My first conflict with a modern feminist was several years ago at an anarchist activist training camp. The feminists had organised lots of special facilities for the women - special women only camping (the best area in the field, with its own water supply, nice and flat while everyone else was further down a bumpy hill, and close enough to the toilets to be convenient without having to smell them) as well as special women only seminars on feminism and fighting the patriarchy. It was bizar…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:51 PM
1

How are they mutually exclusive in your opinion?
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:44 PM
3

I think evolutionary psychology goes a long way to supporting red pill concepts, don't you?
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:16 PM
2

No, look at Muslim societies - Islam seems to understand female evil, so treat women accordingly. The less "sophisticated" a society, and more connected with the brutalities of living, the less women are able to use their wiles to manipulate society to their selfish advantage. Feminism, whilst representing the natural callousness and self-interested nature of females - is in fact against the natural way humans organise themselves. In a more balanced arrangement, men and women are both aware of h…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:13 PM
3

How does that "natural order" express itself in Muslim societies? My point is, when men are clued in to what women are actually like, they don't allow themselves to be fucked around by women. It's taken decades of feminist manipulation of society to brainwash the public into believing that all the measures put in place to constrain female evil were actually injustice against women, and so should be removed, and as a result, we see female evil running rampant. Men's reaction to female evil is as …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 06:03 PM
3

Feminism spins abstract loops disconnected from reality. It's this disconnect that makes it wrong. Indeed, the endless hamstering. It's bizarre that one aspect of the pedestalizing of women is the new age idea that, since women are more emotional and feelings based, they are inherently more connected to "the universe" and have greater intuitive capacity, compared to men who are vilified as being too logical, cold, closed and rational. And yet the truth is that the women's own political movement …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:55 PM
5

I'm similar, I read both subs. r/redpill is more realist, r/mensrights is more idealist. I don't agree with everything posted in either sub.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:45 PM
1

And then there's the fact that you'll be crucified for bringing the good word. Martyrs and heroes get killed according to that old black book Indeed. I used to be friends with a lot of radical Leftists and anarcho communists. When I began to speak out against Feminism, I was vilified, then ostracised. It was a difficult time, as I had previously understood that those people considered themselves advocates of free speech, and open to alternative thinking - I found the exact opposite is true!
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:38 PM
8

I'm already quite familiar with r/DarkEnlightenment. I agree with many of those ideas, but not all. I don't think a monarchy is a desirable form of societal organisation, for example; such hierarchies simply allow tyrants to inflict the worst kinds of cruelty humans are capable of without being challenged. There is no reason to think that the humans that end up in the position of monarch are the best suited to the job - history has shown they usually aren't.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:36 PM
3

I'm inclined to agree. But our feelings towards women have altered over time thanks to feminism, away from the biologically sensible norms. For example, women are now encouraged to work, and view motherhood as a failure option; they dress slutty, and are expected to still be treated with respect; they sleep around, but still expect to find a high achieving, loyal and faithful husband. Feminism has shifted societies perceptions away from what is biologically sensible for the good of society; it's…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:26 PM
0

I see. What a bunch of fools.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 05:00 PM
1

Oh interesting, I hadn't thought of it that way. I'm not sure I agree that women have no agency, and are not responsible for anything at all - how then can they be held accountable for crimes? I think it's natural to female behaviour to want to act without being held accountable for their own actions though.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 04:38 PM
1

You blame the feminist movement on "oligarchs". It's true that some oligarchs funded some parts of the movement, but "patriarchy theory" was the result of women's own reasoning about society - started by authoress Simone de Beauvoir in her book "The Second Sex", which popularised the idea that women were and always had been second class citizens, the fundamental victim narrative if feminism. You also neglect the abundant creation of false statistics to support the damsel in distress narrative th…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 04:00 PM
1

I just find it bizarre when people don't get it. It seems so obvious to me.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 03:41 PM
0

It's evident you know nothing about the MRM or why it is opposed to feminism. Male disposability is the core men's right's issue. It's the issue from which all other emerge. Watch this classic video to learn.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:47 AM
0

It was ironic. I explained that in another comment.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:43 AM
1

You could volunteer.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:24 AM
0

It was meant in an ironic manner. Nobody tells women to check their privilege, especially not men. Telling others to check their privilege is itself a feminist privilege.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:53 AM
0

All men are registered for the draft, and this is how their vote is "payed" for. Women get their vote for free. Feminism has always been about expanding female privilege, without taking on board the same obligations and responsibilities as men, regardless of what's fair and just. It's been poisonous and sociopathic from the very start. It was never about equality.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:02 AM
3

Nice to see something positive and encouraging posted here! Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 02:59 AM
2

Almost all male U.S. citizens, and male immigrants living in the U.S., who are 18 through 25, are required to register with Selective Service. It's important to know that even though he is registered, a man will not automatically be inducted into the military. In a crisis requiring a draft, men would be called in sequence determined by random lottery number and year of birth. Then, they would be examined for mental, physical and moral fitness by the military before being deferred or exempted fro…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:48 AM
2

No, feminists do nothing about inequalities that favour women. They are non-issues to them.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:35 AM
3

Wait, is that how we give people the right to vote? Yes, men in the US have to sign the draft to agree to be conscripted in order to vote. Women do not. It's an aspect of your female privilege that you don't even know that.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:34 AM
6

First wave feminists wanted the vote, but didn't want to have to "pay" for it by being on the draft, as men did. They wanted the right to vote, without the responsibility of having to lay down their lives for the country, as men do. It's the same today.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:11 AM
2

Sure, and teach black people not to commit crimes while you're about it. /s
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:09 AM
-5

Those were never feminism's goals though. Feminists never wanted women to share the same responsibilities and obligations that men faced. They wanted to keep their female privilege, but still have all the rights that men have, without the same obligations. It was fundamentally selfish from the very start. Sociopathic, in fact.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:51 AM
5

There are things that can be done to minimise the likelihood of being a victim of any crime.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:46 AM
3

Feminism, and women's endorsement of it, has left me with a very dim view of female nature. Ironically, feminism has made me disrespect women, when I didn't before.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:45 AM
23

They are advocating for their own hypoagency - the deeply held female notion that they are not responsible for anything that happens to them.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 01:08 AM
3

You haven't made any logical points. You're just screeching contrarian.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:28 PM
3

lol didn't read!
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:55 PM
4

Go back to tumblr.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:26 PM
8

Who is taking feminism seriously other than feminists? Who? Politicians, educators, journalists, the media, law makers. All of mainstream western culture.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:16 PM
3

I like the fact that there is divergence of opinion here. It stops things becoming too much of a circle jerk.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 06:06 PM
2

In the UK, rape is defined as something that men do - and feminists created this definition. That is a way to keep female perpetrated rape anathema to public awareness.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:03 PM
7

But feminism is taken seriously. As you pointed out, the MRM is ignored. But the most powerful leader in the world is a self described feminist. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 06:01 PM
5

Strange how feminists can say and do the craziest of things, and their movement is still taken seriously, by politicians, journalists, and law makers. Yet my commenting on reddit is enough to discredit the entire MRM, somehow. The reason the MRM is not taken seriously has nothing to do with the comparatively moderate behaviour of MRAs (compared to the wild antics of feminists) but because society has a massive problem with recognising the humanity, pain, and suffering if males. Society is gynoce…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:45 PM
2

Feminists have capture the narrative of issues such as rape and domestic violence in order to portray males as only ever being perpetrators, and never victims. They have had their definitions written into law. So feminism is directly, and obviously, to blame for that.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:41 PM
4

I used to be a feminist too. Now I take Men's rights seriously. And I don't take feminism seriously at all. Now I think it's a serious problem in society.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:21 PM
1

I know, it makes me laugh that I think this way of women now, but I've just seen far too many women advocating for their own hypoagency, gynocentrism, and appeal to damselling, to look at things any other way at this point. I can't just put it down to a minority of hard core radical feminists, when the very same ideas come out of my own mother, sister and friend's mouths. I've seen them spin and scream when I've politely presented facts that contradict their point of view, then finger point and …
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:08 AM
2

Indeed, I'm sure we've all been there until we learned better and realised what was going on.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 03:43 AM
0

Most women who support "feminism" support dictionary-definition-feminism. Nonsense. I have debated many supporters of feminism, some I have known personally, some in my own family, and they are always extremely resistant to letting go of the idea that women are anything other "oppressed" by "male dominated society", and as such need additional help from society (i.e. advocating hypoagency, gynocentrism, and using damselling) in order to simply exist. Whenever I point out the myriad issues that e…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:39 AM
1

Feminism was always this way. It's not true that the damselling, hypoagency, or toxic femininity are new aspects of the feminist movement. All of patriarchy theory is a justification for female hypoagency, the idea that women have always been victims of male "oppression" is itself damselling, and the endless feminist use of misleading and emotive false statistics is toxic, and manipulative. As I said, feminism itself shows the true nature of women. Feminism is their contribution to the progressi…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 01:15 AM
1

Women who play damsel, indulge in hypoagency and toxic femininity in general And yet there is an entire global political movement, created by and for women, with millions of eager female supporters, that uses these tactics as its modus operandi. The rhetoric and behaviour of feminists themselves betrays the true nature of women.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:57 AM
1

Personally no, but that's because I disagree with Paglia's philosophy. I don't believe that humans are innately wicked and vicious. You keep asserting that this is her philosophy, but you have yet to prove it in her own words. You keep putting your words into her mouth. However I agree that women are inherently dishonest and manipulative, and know how to use their status as society's suffering "victims" as a source of power with which to manipulate men - playing the damsel in distress that needs…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:44 PM
1

What I am arguing is that Paglia believes that when a man rapes a woman he is giving in to a monstrous cruelty inherent to male nature. You did it again - implying that only men are inherently evil. Paglia believes that cruelty is inherent to human nature, not just male. We made that clear earlier. I agree with this sentiment - that all humans have the potential to be cruel, and that the role of civilisation is to minimise the opportunity for that cruelty to manifest. Cruelty can be an expressio…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:48 PM
2

I didn't make this, I believe it was made by AVFM.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:44 AM
1

You are working very hard to make it look like she is saying something she is not. Look at the implications of what she is saying. The man without social conditioning... the man in a "state of nature"... is innately cruel. The rapist is what happens when society hasn't restrained human nature enough. It's all about implications with you - it's all about how you interpret what she is sayings not what she actually said. When social controls weaken, man’s innate cruelty bursts forth. Here she is us…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:43 AM
1

an urge to rape is (to Paglia) part of this id. You would have to find a direct quote from her saying this, otherwise it seems you are interpreting her work in a manner that suits you. if you had said she views the urge to masturbate is part of the id, you may have been right. To not masturbate constantly is indeed, "shaking our fist in the face of nature"' (so to speak) as is resisting the urge to overindulge in sugary foods, for example. Those are both examples of unhealthy tendencies that one…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:57 AM
25

But it's still what they actually do, they just aren't as explicit about it.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 09:58 PM
50

No, it's a parody.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 09:50 PM
1

I disagree. Read these passages again :- The sexual stalker, who is often an alienated loser consumed with his own failures, is motivated by an atavistic hunting reflex. He is called a predator precisely because he turns his victims into prey. ... extreme sex crimes like rape-murder emanate from a primitive level that even practical psychology no longer has a language for. Psychopathology, as in Richard von Krafft-Ebing’s grisly Psychopathia Sexualis (1886), was a central field in early psychoan…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:43 PM
1

I realise that, yes. She's warping Paglia's words to suit her own interpretation, then saying men agree with her.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 08:33 PM
1

I posted this an example of how feminists twist information to suit their warped world view. Paglia never said all men were rapists - she said real rape is the result of mental illness on the part of the rapists.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:58 PM
7

This is the article she is talking about. She completely misconstrues what Camille Paglia is saying; Paglia makes it clear that she is talking about psychotic, delusional, mentally ill men that rape - it is the salon article that claims that all men are this way.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 12:51 PM
4

It's called being manipulative.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 12:41 PM
16

It was far more bleak before the MRM started happening. You just didn't know.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:09 PM
2

I really hope Emma Watson sees this video.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:07 PM
3

Great post. Was that meant to be a lnk at the end? Also, you might want to mention the scam artists Sarkesian.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 06:16 PM
2

No, I'm an old timer.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:59 AM
1

The temperature was predicted to rise in the upper troposphere (part of the lower atmosphere). No heating occurred there. That alone throws the whole theory into disarray, due to the butterfly effect. Also, there are no long term temperature records for the ocean.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 09:55 PM
3

I strongly suspect that even though there may be some men that employ that strategy, it doesn't work for them. Women don't find those behaviours attractive in a man, and feel little compulsion to help a childlike man, which contrasts the manner in which men have a compulsion to help childlike women.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 05:37 PM
2

No, even anthropogenic global warming advocates acknowledge that there is a definite "pause" in global warming. They are struggling to explain it. Read here to learn more.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 05:00 PM
5

That "95% of scientists" statistic is bogus. It was taken from an online poll only made known to climate change believers. Read here to learn about how flawed that poll was.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 04:58 PM
6

I can only assume you are quite young and don't know any actual men. Men most certainly don't behave in this whiney pouty manner that women are renowned for - nobody respects that in men, so it doesn't work as a means to getting what one wants.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:49 PM
55

One aspect of female privilege is to pout, make sad eyes, and say things like "I've wanted this ever since I was a little girl" and STILL have their demands taken seriously. Men behaving like that, is just comedy. Men are expected to act like adults, while women get away with acting like children, while making adult demands.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:11 PM
2

I'm not "pedestalizing" her, all I said was she had behaved decently. Decent just means "acceptable", it doesn't mean "pedestal". In her situation, I actually expect most women would have just got pregnant and trapped him - that's been a recurring pattern for generations. The woman in this post has shown she is better than most women - but that's only because most women are less than decent.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 10:36 PM
25

But she did the decent thing, and didn't have a baby without her boyfriend's consent, which was within her power to do. She could have had a baby already, and ensnared her boyfriend in the process. She didn't do that and that's a testament to her character. In this instance, I honestly feel the boyfriend screwed her over, while she was being a decent person.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 05:52 PM
1

I am.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 03:25 AM
3

But isn't stupidity so infuriating? I hate seeing stupidity in either men or women. It infuriates me to see it in people I'm close to.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 03:36 PM
3

You're a fucking idiot for having an argument with your feminist girlfriend over a feminist issue. To feminists, anything can become a feminist issue. They believe "the personal is the political" - it's a way to raise trivial events to hyperbolic levels of importance. This relationship was doomed from the start. Never attempt to form a LTR with a self identified feminist.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 03:33 PM
5

Made me lol. As an ex-hippy, I too now find hippies utterly stupid and ridiculous.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 06:42 PM
4

Feminists/cultural Marxists want to control all media. They will try to infiltrate and take over all media sources. This is why they hate platforms which encourage freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:18 PM
75

Grammar is an aspect of the patriarchy that privileges men and subordinates women. ^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:22 PM
3

She just sounds like a typical feminist to me. This is why feminism is a problem.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 09:30 PM
80

The men that tried to fabricate excuses for her are ALL contributing to our culture's problem with denying women accountability for their actions. Men need to stop making weak excuses for women, and stop believing women's weak excuses for themselves.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 11:45 AM
7

Irony is, she's actually from a very wealthy "privileged" background, having been privately educated. She doesn't even live in the UK, she lives in LA - yet claims to be speaking for the poor and needy. She hasn't got a clue what she's talking about, she's just good at creating a spectacle of herself.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/14 09:03 AM
1

This is a great video.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:36 PM
3

BBC is absurdly pro-feminist. When a feminist appeared on the BBC programme newsnight, her comment that "men are raised to hate women" went completely unchallenged. This video explains more.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 05:21 PM
2

Absolutely. I suspect a hatchet job is on the way.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:09 PM
7

Unfortunately, most feminists identify Christina Hoff Sommers as an anti-feminist and MRA so don't listen to her at all.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 08:07 PM
12

"Rape culture" is not meant to donate isolated examples of powerful people pulling strings to absolve those close to them of wrong doing. It is meant to describe an entire culture where rape is normalised and ignored. No such culture exists in the west. It's bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 07:57 PM
13

"Rape culture" is a crock of shit. Anyone that's been accused of rape knows that crime is taken extremely seriously, not excused or ignored. The real crime that is genuinely ignored and excused are false rape allegations. We live in a "false rape allegation culture", not one which condones rape, as proponents or "rape culture" theory pretend.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 07:47 PM
20

Feminism isn't meant to make sense. It's completely irrational: "women's logic" and female psychological manipulation taken to the level of a political narrative. It's sole purpose is to "empower" women so as to ensure that every single one of their fact-free, feelings based complaints is heard and accommodated to by society, whatever the cost, and regardless of whether it's fair, right, or justified. The entire enterprise has become a huge shit test intended to shame men into total submission, …
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 05:37 PM
1

Fair point. But I've seen this pattern before from unscrupulous women - to aggressively provoke a retaliation then play the victim.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:01 PM
5

Good for her. It's uplifting when people with integrity speak out against corruption.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:34 PM
7

Strange you see it that way. As an "old timer" myself, I only see this stuff gaining more and more power. Terms like "rape culture" and "patriarchy" are repeated in mainstream news sources with the commentators even blinking. Political parties promote women ahead of men with better qualification, and have mandatory female gender quotas. Government wants to force private companies to adopt female gender quotas to their boards. It's more as of feminism and PC rhetoric is peaking, not "bleeding out…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:58 PM
4

It wasn't in the glossary, that's why I asked.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 11:08 PM
4

What are IOIs? I can't find that in the glossary of Terms.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 08:07 PM
3

The mods over there are in open communication with Zooey Quinn on twitter, and are taking her side.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:29 PM
6

It demonstrates the hypocrisy of feminists and SJWs.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:29 PM
1

This video is really important in exposing feminist/white knight hypocrisy. You should post it again with a more eye catching and relevant title, such as "How feminist hypocrisy is destroying the gaming community".
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:02 PM
1

They had actually been kidnapping and murdering male students long before their group reached public awareness via the "bring back our girls" campaign.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:55 PM
1

Making a joke out of men's issues, and passing it off as satire is a perfect way example of the casual disregard feminists have for men's suffering, either way. It's still relevant.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:53 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:14 AM
1

Why would they call a man a girl?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:53 PM
15

Wage gap is the result of women's choices. NOT a serious issue. This video explains.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:32 PM
6

The vast majority of those men did not have the vote in fact.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 02:46 PM
12

They aren't just random sadistic people. The woman in the centre is applauded outspoken Feminist, author, and creator of the site Feministing, Jessica Valenti. As well as that, they are all representative of a wider movement that is big enough to have products like these "male tears" clothes and mugs marketed to them.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 02:46 PM
2

Who are they referring to? The judge, or the violent abusive woman?
/r/MensRights17/08/14 02:42 PM
10

That 70s Show. Managed to avoid the 90s trend of bashing men, while also depicting the hypocrisy of what feminists say about "equality" compared to how women want to behave.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 09:14 AM
3

She's an "empowered woman"; she's clearly proud of her violent behaviour, standing there smirking as her violent actions are recounted. It's evil. Imagine how a woman beating man would appear if he smiled proudly like that as an account of how he kicked and stabbed his wife was publicly delivered? People would see him as a monster.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:38 AM
5

Feminists don't even know what equality is.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 04:07 AM
7

Perhaps you don't realise, that at the same time that Boko Haram kidnapped the "original" girls that came to media attention, they had already been killing male students? The point is, society doesn't give a shit about men.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:19 AM
4

It's the "gender empathy gap".
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:09 AM
58

Don't forget, most men did not have the vote before 1918 (in the UK, and a similar date in the US). Those men also did not get any empathy.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:08 AM
9

The kidnapped boys are not white. We are the only group that actually seems to care about them - you certainly don't.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:06 AM
18

Because ladies are always "nice" not like those awful men, who REALLY DO hate women.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 03:30 PM
7

Normally the rates are only three times more. It increases to six times more after divorce. The nature of Divorce is the factor being illuminated. It doubles the suicide rate for men.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:47 AM
9

Compared to divorced women. http://www.mensdefense.org/STM_Book/MenDrivenOver.htm
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:01 AM
102

Divorced men are six times more likely to commit suicide, so it's relevant and topical.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 06:27 PM
3

Feminism isn't about gender equality, it's about "empowering women". Male feminists are men that assist with that, not men that ask for fair treatment and not to be discriminated against based on their gender.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:44 PM
24

I heard it said (probably here) that guys are nasty to each other all the time, but don't mean it, while girls are nice to each other all the time, but don't mean it.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 08:22 PM
4

Perhaps it depends where you go. I visited a wealthy wine growing region, perhaps things were somewhat more sophisticated there. I still hate the place though - the racial divide in inequality is absolutely appalling. I don't know how white South Africans live with themselves.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 08:13 PM
6

I too suspect it was South Africa. White South Africans basically model themselves on Europeans.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 05:37 PM
-1

You're not a mod here, and no mod has objected, just whiney concern trolls.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 10:55 PM
2

Yes, that statistic is bullshit - I sometimes forget that not everybody knows that. It's an exaggerated statistic made up by rape obsessed feminists, which helps fuel the rape paranoia and victim mentality if women like this one (and all those supporting her in the comments).
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 03:42 PM
-5

That was not what I asked. Is the Huffington Post banned on this sub?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:06 PM
0

Are they banned on this sub?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 01:57 PM
0

How is the title "Running While Female" click bait?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 01:40 PM
0

Didn't effect me. Maybe you have some malware?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 01:30 PM
12

First of all, I suspect it wasn't even the same man. Second, I called this a "rape fantasy gone bad" because no rape has actually happened, but she is imagining it the entire time, and blaming the contents of her imagination on a man that happens to be keeping pace with her jogging (who probably isn't the man who was on the bike earlier). Why is she obsessing over rape, specifically? Why isn't she worried about other crime - for example, being mugged, kidnapped, or murdered? Why is rape the only…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 11:00 AM
16

It's probably not even the same guy. She never got a good look at him either time. First he was just passing on his bike, then the second man was running behind her - neither instance offers the opportunity to have a good look. It was probably just someone that looked similar, and she just freaked out over nothing.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 10:43 AM
22

The whole piece is a rape fantasy. Nothing actually happened - this is an insight into female paranoia. Look at the comments - all the women back her up, only a small handful of men point out that nothing happened except in her imagination.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 10:39 AM
20

Indeed - she's portraying herself as the victim in all this; none of it is her fault, she had sex "by accident" and now the asshole that did it to her is "harassing" her at work. All bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 10:10 AM
3

Perhaps I should have said "reinforces the message".
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:51 PM
4

Isn't that more or less what happens in Shrek 3?
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:50 PM
17

Her lenient treatment also sends a message to all women, that they can assault men with complete impunity - that they can hit men, but can never be hit back. If she had known she might be prosecuted for assaulting that boy, she most likely would not have done it, but because of women's continued lenient treatment under the law, she felt entitled to attack him, and even to complain when he tried to defend himself. Until women are sentenced the same way men are, this behaviour will continue - men …
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:56 PM
7

I don't know of it's these two that did it, and I don't know now they got around the anti-discrimination laws, but a female only plumbing company has started now. It's called stopcocks. I kid you not.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 01:54 PM
10

Muh victim narrative.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:42 PM
0

Delete this post, delete your account, leave reddit, and never come back.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:51 PM
11

Looks like this is your first post to reddit, apart from one other now deleted post that you titled, "debunking the men's rights movement".
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:20 PM
1

No, she "lost" her career. She misplaced it somehow. It wasn't her fault. /s
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 01:18 AM
3

Exactly.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 01:14 AM
4

The point is, somehow, amazingly, none of this is her fault.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 11:10 PM
2

What an atrocious thing to debate to begin with. How about we debate whether white people are better than black people, using a family with white and black parents and adopted black and white children children? Offensive and fucked up, much? Feminists like Hanna Rosin are some of the most bigoted and obnoxious people. Edit: I couldn't make it all the way through the "debate" - I cant believe they put that boy through that.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 09:51 PM
4

A legend in his own time.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 08:30 PM
1

Do you have a link for that?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:18 PM
13

She has admitted that her son doesn't like her work promoting "the end of men" and leaves her upset messages on doors and elsewhere. If she is willing to admit that, yet is capable of perverting logic as badly as she has in this article, I fear the situation for her son might be even worse than she is telling us - she could well be an extremely abusive mother, that disregards all her sons suffering and complaints simply because he is male, and so all his needs are secondary to hers: An archetypi…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 05:23 PM
1

Could you explain why this makes sense now? I'd like to understand your thought process better, if that's ok?
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 09:35 PM
1

You are commenting on a post that is 7 days old, so not many people are likely to see what you have written here. I received a notification, but only because I am the person that made the post to which you are replying. I am not an expert in family law, so I'm afraid I cannot advise. You sound quite run down and desperate though, so I hope it is not too presumptuous of me to suggest the subreddit r/suicidewatch as a place you can post and receive advice. I'm quite certain that there will be othe…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 09:40 PM
1

Maybe, but once you see it, it can never be unseen. At one time, black people, or gay people, received no compassion, and that has changed considerably. Societies can change even when there were biological/evolutionary roots to the behaviours that formed their norms and traditions; racism is based in instinctive fear of outsiders and strangers because they represent a potential threat to the tribe; homophobia in the instinctive recognition that men needed to procreate with women only, if the tri…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:29 PM
26

Society has no compassion for men, we know this here. It's time for that to end.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:51 PM
1

It's not funny though, is it?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:53 PM
7

No, it just got adapted, into preferential treatment in divorce courts, sentencing bias, affirmative action, and government spending on gynocentric issues.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:47 PM
5

That may well be his aim; to antagonise MHRAs so much that some individual reacts with violence - then he can claim he was right all along.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:31 PM
7

Feminism is chivalry 2.0
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:08 PM
10

Many "human rights" charities, like Oxfam and Amnesty international, are now basically feminist organisations, having been infiltrated and taken over. Don't give them your money.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:08 PM
6

He's notorious within the MHRM. Well known for quote mining and taking statements way out of context, in order to represent MRHAs as violent misogynists.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:22 PM
7

That's discredited writer, feminist, anti-Men's Human Rights activist David Futrelle you are linking to there.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:48 PM
-2

It's factual. Look it up.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:19 PM
8

I posted it yesterday, actually.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:15 PM
-1

Because it's true.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:11 PM
3

Read the article. Social services might pick on you next.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:19 PM
1

Rubbish. The Daily a Mail pushes agendas into main stream awareness. It's a formidable force in British Politics. You may not like it, but it is.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:18 PM
3

How about the telegraph then?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 02:34 AM
-1

The daily mail is a real newspaper - one that has massive influence in the UK. It's one of the most widely circulated in the country.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:55 AM
2

What? I love the daily mail. It's the best newspaper in the UK. It has no equal.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:54 AM
0

Nice sock puppet account, btw.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:44 AM
6

Lol, you're using rational wiki as if it's a credible source! Enough said.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:24 AM
2

Well, this is something I never thought would happen.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:54 AM
4

It has the capacity to make national and international news, and has a major influence in a British Politics. Stop whining about Daily Mail posts - it's a significant entity in UK news.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:37 AM
1

The Daily Mail is not a tabloid! Here is the story from a local newspaper.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:12 AM
1

Campaigning and achieving shorter, more lenient sentencing for women. In the UK, they are also campaigning for the closure of women's prisons altogether.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:21 PM
1

It's not something they've made a lot of noise about recently - perhaps because of the increased availability of paternity tests - but it used to be a common talking point; how selfish it was for men not to want to raise a child that wasn't even theirs.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:41 PM
1

Because only women have issues. /s
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:31 PM
6

But mathematics, science, and logic are all artifacts of the patriarchy, used to oppress women. /s
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:05 PM
5

It's not an uncommon feminist stance, by any means. For example, in this article, Feminist Hugo Schwyzer makes the comment that, "as a Father, I have nothing but contempt for any man whose love is contingent [on the child being his]", and "I know how absurd it is to link devotion and biology."
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:45 PM
10

No. Many feminists argue that men should be completely unconcerned as to whether they are raising their own children or not.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:34 PM
16

So, make such a post, or contribute to discussions on such posts. Complaining that you don't like other people's posts is about the most counterproductive thing you could possibly do, concern troll.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:32 PM
4

There are already lots of gay and bi MRAs.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 02:28 PM
53

What utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 07:02 PM
3

The Guardian is a festering coven of misandry and radical feminism.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 03:12 PM
1

She must be very manipulative.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:01 PM
3

That's horrific.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 10:08 PM
5

Was her ex boyfriend actually castrated?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:01 PM
1

8 times more spent on women's health than men's, even though men die sooner of all causes I acknowledge that men earn more, but it was you, not me, that said men control the most wealth. But you are lying, women have greater spending power than men, and so control most of the wealth. Men work harder, and longer, earn more, yet women spend more money, and have more money spent in them.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:13 AM
1

Dummy. The sexist bias is in the SPENDING of that money. For example, 8 times more is spent on female health than male, by the NHS, even though men die younger, of all causes. You're stupid, and a time waster.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 11:46 PM
2

Yes, men ARE the top earners. Do you understand what the word "earn" means? Such as earning someone's trust, or earning someone's respect? It means you work, put effort in, and show your worth. The money highly paid men and women earn is because they provide rare skills that are valuable to society. Men earn more than women, not because there is a sexist bias, but because they do more valuable work than women.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:58 PM
2

EARN more money! that's how income tax works. It's not unfair of it's earnt.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 09:38 PM
2

Men do work longer hours, and do more dangerous jobs. 97% of work related fatalities are male, in the UK. Dangerous work pays better (as it should) than less dangerous work of a similar skill level. Unemployment rates are higher amongst men, even though more men than women work, because being a stay at home mother (married to a man that works to support her) does not appear in unemployment statistics. Also, until 2012, being a single mother on benefits was not counted as being unemployed. More m…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:43 PM
1

Men work longer hours, and do more difficult and dangerous jobs. The "death professions" are male dominated. Women are more likely to choose jobs more convenient for their lifestyles, work part time, or not work at all.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:50 PM
-1

I'm not "the MRM". I think this segregated cemetery is bigoted and obnoxious, because it is. Feminists would be right to complain at a cemetery for men only. It creates division, and marginalises and demeans women. But men wouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 10:35 PM
1

It'd be pretty vile an bigoted though, wouldn't it? It wouldn't be applauded by "progressives" as this would be.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:28 PM
-3

I can't imagine anywhere allowing the KKK to create a white only cemetery, no matter their expense...
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:54 PM
1

Hmm... Maybe.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:52 PM
-3

Imagine if this were a cemetery for straight men only. Don't you think feminists would be outraged? But when it's their bigotry, they don't even care or notice.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:34 PM
-1

Doesn't this play into the feminist narrative that men control all the wealth? No. It speaks of the reality that men work harder and earn more, yet are penalised for it by the state, who then tax them (at increasingly higher rates, the more they earn - the top income bracket paying 40% of their income) in order to infairly distribute the money to women. There is state health care in the UK, for example, which spends 8 times a such on female health concerns compared to male - even though it is. A…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:24 PM
3

The hat makes a statement that she is a serious journalist. /s
/r/MensRights31/03/14 09:15 PM
4

This isn't going to go well. Dump her, and tell her its because she's a feminist.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 09:11 PM
8

She rambles on and on, talks about how emotional and important the subject is to her, but does she make a single coherent point? I couldn't find one.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:41 PM
1

A potentially infinite number. Anyone can submit an article.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:40 PM
1

You do realise that lots of different people write on reddit too, for example? Your position on AVFM is similar to reading a few reddit comments, disliking them, and so dismissing the entire site.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:56 PM
1

Lots of different writers though. As explained.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:36 PM
1

How do you know, of you just assume all the articles aren't worth reading?
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:20 PM
2

There are many different writers at AVFM, that write in individual styles. Just because you don't like the tone of this or other articles, is no reason to discredit the entire site.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:40 PM
8

Could you write a piece about Laurie Penny yourself then, and do it better? I actually found this article very thorough and well researched. Everything was referenced and linked to. You are merely a presenting a tone argument, which is itself extremely unhelpful and subjective. As far as I'm aware, this is the only detailed criticism of Penny that currently exists right now, and therefore the best. Laurie Penny really is a dishonest, hypocritical child of privilege, and sorely needs to be thorou…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:39 PM
6

Feminism has created monsters.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:47 PM
1

There was also her piece attacking an Eton scholarship question, which challenged students to write a speech for an imaginary prime minister that had had to order the deaths of civilians following some kind of moral dilemma. Penny pretended that this was somehow typical of how the elite are "trained to think" - to see civilians as merely expendable pawns - but the truth is that she herself had an elite education, having been to a top private school, and then going on to study at Oxford. She knew…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 12:02 AM
1

It's just... very satisfying seeing her taken down in this manner. She's such a lying little hypocrite. It's HER that starts the personal attacks against David Starkey, and when he responds in similar manner, she simpy can't handle it, and falls apart. She then tries to play the damsel in distress, but the organisers and audience aren't having it, because they saw that she was the initial aggressor. Penny then resorts to trying to call the situation "violent", as if that gives her some kind of m…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 04:25 PM
1

Do you have any other videos of Penny getting slammed like this?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:54 PM
1

That she's a total hypocrite, a liar, and a fraud?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:53 PM
1

If you dislike penny, you might like this.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:52 PM
3

If you dislike penny, you might like this.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:52 PM
6

http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:43 AM
3

Feminists are psychos.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:39 AM
7

Awesome video. Thunder foot smashes it yet again.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:37 AM
2

Sorry, I don't understand this. Are you being sarcastic, or did you accidentally send this message mid sentence?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:33 AM
16

It's always the boys fault to some people.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:09 AM
2

What a shit tshirt. Only a feminist could come up with that crap.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:02 PM
2

So.... You're saying this wasn't the girl's fault? That perhaps they were just made this way, by "the patriarchy"?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:00 PM
2

The reason for this is that cultural Marxists infiltrated and now dominate most of academia, especially the social sciences. Women's studies, gender studies, queer studies, and related subjects all draw from the same source - the Fankfurt School's "critical theory" which sought to undermine the "social relations" that make up "capitalism" in order to dismantle and overthrow it completely. This video goes some of the way to explain what happened.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:59 PM
2

Recently, I man in the UK was arrested for writing much less threatening things to a feminist on twitter. It was all over the mainstream media, the BBC running a piece on how the internet is male dominated and a threat to women. This is an example of how vast the double standards are.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 06:28 PM
2

This is exactly what I would expect from a feminist. They claim they are all about equality, but really they are all about hypocrisy and double standards.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:11 PM
3

You might be on to something.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:32 PM
2

Daily Mail doesn't have a "page 3". You're thinking of "The Sun".
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:28 PM
-2

The press awards are voted on by a panel of journalists and newspaper executives. If the NOTW won in 2005, then they must have done something exceptional in that year (they occasionally do some real journalism). Mostly, the award of newspaper of the year goes to more serious newspapers. What's you favourite UK newspaper then? the Guardian, I assume? ;)
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:27 AM
-1

The awards the daily mail won, at the press awards, were chosen by editors of other newspapers - that's how the press awards work, it's a kind of peer review. If you think their opinions are invalid, and using their opinions is "an appeal to authority", then you are invalidating ALL the UK newspapers.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 02:11 AM
-3

Because if the newspaper was a "joke" as you dishonestly claim, it wouldn't receive any awards at all, of course!
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:57 AM
7

Exactly. In fact, some already successful very large companies have already been actively recruiting women and promoting them based on gender - and these same companies are backing the government implementing mandatory quotas across the EU. A cynic might suggest that this is because they know it will stifle their smaller competitors.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:49 AM
0

You're criticisms of the daily mail are a joke. It still won newspaper of the year in 2012, proof that it has the respect of other newspapers and is respected for its journalism. You just criticise it because you don't like it.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:42 AM
-2

It was voted newspaper of the year in 2012, for excellent journalism. It's only considered a "joke" by those that don't like it - mostly feminists and left wing ideologues. It's the second most widely read newspaper in the UK.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:58 AM
4

/s
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:06 PM
4

The female section is not pro-feminist. Do you know ANY newspaper that has a men's section?
/r/MensRights23/03/14 07:47 PM
5

The Daily Mail. There is an MRA columnist, but I can't remember his name.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 05:36 PM
0

Can you ever imagine a man being paid that amount?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 08:50 PM
10

The man that runs that blog - justice for men and boys - runs the only political party in the UK (and the world) that priorities MR issues, so it's a good idea to give him traffic.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:15 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:37 PM
8

Don't pay it. Just use internet tv. So long as you don't watch live tv as it is being broadcast, you don't have yo have a license.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:42 PM
2

I assume you're being sarcastic?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:56 PM
-1

The attempts to deny her culpability of her own actions is what makes this relevant. That wouldn't happen if a male was on trial.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:36 PM
2

Ah, I cant edit it now. I got auto corrected.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:35 PM
10

It takes very little brain power to think like a feminists. You just need to remember - women good, men bad. And that's it.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:41 PM
1

Turns out it's all true, and she was in far deeper than the mail even suggested. What say you now?
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:12 PM
1

Haha, you got it!
/r/MensRights27/02/14 03:49 PM
1

Don't worry too much about down votes. Often people don't think too hard before clicking. When I first posted this video, it got down voted to zero, with no explanation. I deleted it and posted it again, and now it has over sixty up votes. I don't know what happened before, maybe I was caught by a wave of rad fem trolls. I think it's a great video, and deserved more coverage. It's always easy to nit pick and criticise, easier than it is to create, and doubtless if you or anyone else had made a s…
/r/MensRights27/02/14 03:41 PM
5

Well, you could always make that video yourself!
/r/MensRights27/02/14 03:27 AM
7

He already made the point - based on her own words - that feminism is about getting men to help women, and lose their "privilege", so it really is pretty dumb to claim that any of that helps men at all.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 02:50 AM
5

The women were the primary victims though, because they had to survive the ordeal. /s
/r/MensRights26/02/14 08:03 PM
7

What does any of that have to do with anthropology?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 04:04 AM
2

It's written by a man, Ally Fogg, who is basically a feminist, although he sometimes writes about men's issues, from a feminist perspective. He subscribes to patriarchy theory, so of course he thinks men do this to themselves.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:53 PM
0

Some people get very cross when one says it though, I usually notice.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:46 AM
1

This is why no UK MRA should ever vote labour.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:13 PM
1

The Guardian is a national tragedy.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:08 PM
1

Not sure why you've been down voted.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 03:24 PM
1

This doesn't contradict the notion that feminists use the EU as a weapon to achieve their ends, it supports it.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 03:23 PM
1

It's in the last couple of paragraphs.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:35 PM
1

Could you expand on what you mean by that? I don't fully understand.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:16 AM
9

But feminists lie, all the time.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:10 AM
1

Time to revise your opinion about feminists!
/r/MensRights01/02/14 11:59 PM
7

The unmistakable scent if the pussy pass.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 01:02 AM
-7

I'm in Britain, not the USA. It was not national news.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:24 PM
1

I never even heard of this before. If it had been a man targeting women, it would have been national news!
/r/MensRights23/01/14 04:04 PM
2

Feminism not about "equality" - and it never really was - it's about increasing privilege and entitlements for women.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:59 PM
6

The Labia Party. For those that don't know, they are the main left-leaning party in the UK - equivalent to America's "Democrats". Currently they are not in power, however, having been voted out in t last election in 2010. They already have quotas for women in the Labour party, and have mandated that the leader or deputy leader of the party will lways be female. The current deputy leader was Harriet Harman, avowed Feminist and formerly the "minister for women" - a position that party created. Any…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:02 PM
1

The torture could not have happened without her. She was completely complicit in the plan. She enabled them to brutalise their victim. She could have called the police while he was being tortured. She did not. She could have called the police before the torture (she had a phone, through which she texted the victim) she did not. She got aroused watching the torture happen. If she had been gay male, there is no way the judge would have excused her actions. The only reason she received no punishmen…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:16 PM
6

AKA - A feminist starts to realise that feminism is a pain in the ass.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:21 PM
1

I deleted the post anyway. It was crappy. I have no personal connection to that website - it was linked as the source of the study, under a youtube video, and I took the video at it's word, mistakenly. I couldn't find the study when I tried, only articles about the study, and decided to delete the post later.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 03:08 AM
5

I never implied I thought he was guilty - I just wanted to know why OP was so certain.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 02:30 AM
30

I'm actually just wary in case this is a troll post. Look at the username, for example. Too easy to post here, claiming to be on our side, only to pull the rug from underneath by turning it all around, and claiming the boyfriend really was a rapist, and we were all biased in assuming his innocence.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:13 PM
1

Should I just delete this post? I made a mess of it.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:02 PM
2

You're right. I messed up again. I'll try to hunt down the study. Edit, I can't find the study, but here is a detailed article about the results
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:01 PM
48

How are you certain the accusation is false?
/r/MensRights11/01/14 04:57 PM
5

Messed up the link. Here it is.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 04:49 PM
12

That's a misleading title. I followed the link expecting to be appalled at their endorsement of violence, and found the exact opposite, thankfully.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:00 PM
1

Yeah, true, I thought that afterwards.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:41 PM
15

It draws attention to female vs male privilege.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:20 AM
16

The author of this article realises that feminism is big enough now, that it can afford to dump the men that were duped into supporting the movement under the belief that it was all about egalitarianism. Feminism was never about egalitarianism, true equality, or humanism, but hid behind these terms, in order to garner larger support for itself. But now that the movement is mainstream, that pretence can be dropped. The egalitarians that supported feminism were merely useful idiots, who are now be…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:16 AM
23

Feminism - the radical notion that only women have problems.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:09 PM
6

There's CCTV footage of her hitting him, along with everyone else. It's been mandated by UK government that women receive lighter sentences.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 09:46 AM
8

So you think she only deserved 4 months?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:44 PM
14

False equivalence. If you lived with the murderer, while they systematically abused the victim, joined in the abuse, had the victim do chores for you (or face more abuse), and stood by while the victim was punished for not doing the chores you asked them to do correctly - when you could have called the police at any time and stopped the situation - then you definitely deserve a very severe sentence. I think they all deserve much more severe sentences, but especially her.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 08:47 PM
13

While she stood watching. She was an accomplice, and endorsed what was happening. Do you think she only deserved 4 months?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 08:29 PM
14

If you watch the CCTV footage, you can see that she hits the captive man too.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:59 PM
19

Four MONTHS compared to six YEARS? Did you read the title correctly?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:58 PM
66

You can even see the Mother hitting the captive man in the CCTV footage - she was equally culpable in his abuse and enslavement, but wasn't equally sentenced.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:57 PM
1

Yeah, I was wrong about that. Ignore that previous comment.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 06:14 PM
5

Nah, I didn't really mean that. I take back that comment I made earlier. It was wrong anyway. Feminists are experts at hiding their mistakes. If they did ruin Sweden, they'd find some way to blame it on men, and say more feminism was needed as the solution. And the Main Stream Media across the world would probably agree with them.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 12:26 AM
1

Okay fair enough. I would have thought that that definition applies to posts directed at deliberately shaming specific people through comments they have made on facebook. But I can see that it's probably better to err on the side of caution, given how biased the admins have been in the past about such matters.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 09:25 PM
1

Really? I had no idea. How can a sub like this exist then? http://www.reddit.com/r/Facebookpages
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:45 PM
3

Neither would i be, if I were a Swede, but you might have to take the fall for the rest of us.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:08 PM
8

I hope they don't get better. I hope the feminists win and utterly destroy Sweden, making it so ruined that it's a clear example to the rest of the world. One of the reasons that feminism is not recognised for the harm it does, is because there is still enough common sense around to buffer feminism's consequences. But if all that common sense were gone, feminists would just wreck everything. So I hope Sweden goes under once and for all, and is ruined forever.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 05:15 PM
4

They call it the "Muffington Boast" for good reason.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:32 PM
1

Hehe
/r/MensRights01/01/14 03:30 PM
1

Also been to India. What's your point?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 01:57 AM
1

You commented on my post! I'm honoured! :)
/r/MensRights01/01/14 01:56 AM
22

The sense of entitlement is ridiculous. Also, the omission of truth. They ignore the reality of (non-feminist) female prime minister Margaret Thatcher, who never lost an election. The current opposition party has mandated 50% of their MPs be female, regardless if ability, and that the leader or deputy leader of the party always be a woman. And yet STILL they can't make half their party women, because there simply isn't enough of them interested in taking the positions! If there aren't more women…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 09:43 AM
2

I don't think he supports extremists, or is antisemetic. I very much doubt he supports Israel though.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 02:59 AM
21

equally critical of gossip mags Such a claim is laughable, and says much of feminist's warped sense of of what "equality" means. Prominent feminist groups are running the campaign to ban lads mags but no feminist group is attempting to ban gossip magazines. That's feminist "equality".
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:02 PM
110

I remember when the "lads mag" ban was getting a lot of media coverage, and sitting in a cafe where they sold magazines - I saw both the lads mags and gossip mags had the same paparazzi shot of some celeb in a bikini; the lads mag was complimenting her physique, while the gossip mag was full of criticism and disdain - and yet feminists were claiming the former magazines are the harmful ones. The same picture, but only the male - complimenting - one was bad, because feminists claim - without real…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 02:55 PM
2

I'm not a socialist like him, but I agree with his anti-war stance.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 02:17 PM
3

This is great, I had no idea George Galloway was on board with these issues!
/r/MensRights29/12/13 02:36 PM
1

Nightwish I just wrote a haiku. If they are already someone's lyrics, then that was just an accident.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 11:02 PM
2

*are God dammit!
/r/MensRights28/12/13 09:07 PM
1

Angry voices scream, While wisdom speaks too softly, And is seldom heard.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 06:49 PM
15

No, ALL the boys she gave feathers to were too young to vote. Men and women got the vote in the UK at the same time, in 1918. Prior to that, only land owners could vote. Even female land owners could vote in local elections. The vast majority of men did not have the vote in the UK prior to 1918. The vast majority of British men that died in WW1 did not have the vote. So the men and boys Emily Pankhurst shamed into enlisting, were most likely not to have the vote at all, regardless of their age. …
/r/MensRights28/12/13 01:01 AM
2

I don't have the answer. The answer is obvious: every woman has intrinsic value, because she has the ability to reproduce. In our evolutionary past, any tribe or group that didn't priorities the safety of females died out pretty fast - without a future generation, there is no tribe; so preservation of the females meant survival for that group. Hence the dangerous work is delegated to the males, who are also more physically suited to it, while safer indoor work becomes more the female domain as a…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 11:23 PM
6

Not really. All society sees males as disposable, to some extent. This is why nobody bats an eye that 97% of work related deaths are male, for example. Only MRAs - who are going against the grain - talk about this matter. Society simply expects men to do all the dangerous and dirty work that is required for it to function. It's part of the way society sees men: the ones that are able to take the pain, man up, suck it up, and get on with shovelling the shit - because nobody else is going to do it…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 12:45 AM
3

As far as male disposability goes, that's been around from the dawn of time. And wasn't really a feminist construct I never said male disposability was a feminist construct. However, feminists claim to be in favour of gender "equality" but happily turn a blind eye, whenever possible, to male disposability. They just ignore it. Feminism relies on male disposability, because without it, women would be far worse off. If women were considered as disposable as men, then feminism would never have even…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 12:01 AM
6

Absolute rubbish, I'm afraid. Notable first wave feminists Emmeline and Christabelle Pankhurst were key proponents of the "White Feather Campaign" - activism that involved women handing white feathers as symbols of cowardice to men that weren't in military uniform; its aim was to shame men that weren't yet conscripted to fight in the horrors of WW1 to enlist. Boys as young as 14 went to their deaths this way, because of the shame associated with being handed a white feather. So feminists have be…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 11:26 PM
10

Feminists don't care about male disposability, in fact, they are quite happy for it to continue unabated. Male disposability is not a feminist issue.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 11:21 PM
4

This is horrific. I'm speechless.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 08:14 AM
1

So government is vaguely aware of feminist's propensity to produce misinformation?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 10:33 PM
11

Yes, but painting the world as if bad things only happen to women and girls, is how feminists get their funding.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:39 PM
3

I never met the first kind. Just sayin'
/r/MensRights08/12/13 05:27 PM
2

Yes, pixienyx's concern helps us move forward, not back.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:52 AM
1

NAFALT
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:10 PM
2

went in line with early feminist beliefs Not really. Patriarchy theory is one of the earliest feminist beliefs, stemming from the 1949 book "The Second Sex" by Simone de Beauvoir. That's where the idea first emerged that women were the second class citizens, the "oppressed class" in a patriarchy. Early feminism never spoke for men, and was never about true gender equality. Somehow this idea was blended in later, in order to dupe certain men into joining the movement. As the MRA in that clip says…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:15 PM
3

I listened to everyone, include the mob of females.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:13 PM
9

I listened to him. I listened to the audience too - they were just unthinking animals. Do you think that mob were there to do anything other than applaud the "feminist" perspective - that "men need to listen to women more"? They weren't there to change their minds.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:56 PM
1

The women in the audience were just fucking animals!
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:52 PM
23

The dress makes a statement about equality, for men, and what happens when men ask for equality: total ridicule. The lizard brained female audience can't even handle it, and ridicule him anyway. That guy has some real balls. He stood his ground 100%.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:49 PM
0

I would really like to hear her response to the feminists blocking access to the even to raise awareness of male issues, and intimidating, shouting down, ridiculing and humiliating people that wanted to attend. Just not saying anything about it is not a valid response. She's trying to ignore it, as if it hasn't happened. That was only last year...
/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:24 AM
4

It's an example of MRAs organising to raise awareness of men's issues, and, low and behold, look who turns up to shout them down, silence debate, prevent awareness, and generally troll.... Yes, it's feminists. Pretty much the opposite way round of how your "friend" thinks the world is. Edit: BTW, if you keep confronting her with the truth like this, either she won't remain a feminist very long, or she won't be your friend for very long. In my experience, the latter is far more likely...
/r/MensRights05/12/13 01:16 AM
4

Did you show her the video of Feminists targeting and harassing people trying to attend Warren Farrell's conference on men's issues? It shows the opposite of what she's saying - men attempting to raise awareness of issues that effect men and boys (such as the high male suicide rate) and feminists harassing and shouting them down. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0&sns=em
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:22 PM
1

They are denying the child the use of a hearing aid (he has partial use of one ear) against the medical advice,which indicates it would be better advantaged in the long run if started with one early on. That's child abuse. They WANT their child to have this disability, because they think it makes him special. The fact anyoneisdefeninding this pairs hows how this is a men's rights issue - women are given much more leniency and acceptance when they abuse children, and in this instance, many are ev…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:10 PM
15

This isn't even a repost, fool. This is a youtube commentary about that story.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:09 PM
172

There are plenty of people on reddit who have that point of view.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:07 PM
3

That post points out the ways in which Feminists have caused and encouraged discrimination against men. How can you find common ground with a movement that does that? If feminism had been about genuine equality, and not caused discrimination against men, then the MRM would never have been necessary.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 04:03 AM
3

Well, you could have just read the link about this in the side bar... http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g2eme/feminists_tell_you_that_the_solution_to_mens/
/r/MensRights01/12/13 11:43 PM
4

This is such a great video, glad it's getting some attention.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 01:17 AM
3

You think? I didn't get that impression. It really seemed that nothing Paul Elam said penetrated his mind, because he didn't address any of it. He simply repeated misinformation about the MRM as if that alone was proof enough that nothing Paul Elam said in the debate mattered. That's not how one debates - you address the points made, not claim that none of the points made matter, because your opponent is a bad human being.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 04:19 AM
3

This guy Charles Clymer seems to be living in a bubble. Just saying "Feminism isn't toxic for men" isn't making a counter-argument, it's just making a statement. He doesn't address any of the issues Paul Elam raises at all.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:58 AM
2

Yeah, the poor little violent monster was just shy. Bless her. /s
/r/MensRights22/11/13 10:05 PM
8

Indeed - but all too often, women get away with this kind of violence. You can tell, that she has used that smirk before as a way to get herself out of trouble, but this time it didn't work. A smarter more manipulative woman would have masked her emotions more, and cried, playing the victim.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:06 AM
33

Imagine a man committing that kind of violence against a woman, and smirking in court. He'd be flayed alive. Only women can get away with smirking about their violence, as if it's something they can be proud of. Society see female violence as "empowerment". It's disgusting.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:41 AM
4

These are just stupid, ignorant people. These are just Feminists. FTFY
/r/MensRights21/11/13 12:16 AM
1

Reverse the genders and tell us this wouldn't be dong the rounds of all the feminist sites and blogs. Nobody would dare say it wasn't a "feminist" issue under those circumstances, least of all you.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 01:31 PM
1

Actually, women are much more likey to be the abusers of children than men. Does that mean we live in a Matriarchy? I wouldn't argue that - but Feminists take such issues as domestic violence and rape, frame them as all male crimes, and say they are proof of "Patriarchy".
/r/MensRights18/11/13 12:43 AM
13

Article is from 2001. I guess the feminists didn't listen, then.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 08:17 PM
4

You're completely right. A man voting Labour in the UK today, is like a turkey voting for Christmas.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 08:17 PM
11

It refutes feminist ideas about male power, and female victim hood, under "patriarchy" - therefore it is relevant to the struggle to recognise the humanity of men and boys and their rights.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 07:50 PM
8

If the video had shown a man repeatedly hitting his female partner in the face, you wouldn't hesitate to call him an abuser. But instead, this video showed a woman repeatedly running over her male partner with a car, and you are trying to find every reason to declare her innocence. To a brain infected by feminism - as yours clearly is - only men can be abusers.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 07:48 PM
10

where exactly does it say that she was an abuser Man hits his partner once: he is an abuser. Woman attempts to kill partner by running them over repeatedly with a car: not an abuser. That's how feminists think.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 07:33 PM
1

Oops, sorry, don't know how I missed that.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 01:49 PM
1

link?
/r/MensRights15/11/13 02:49 AM
0

So.... Is the author of this article also going to find the quotes from Warren Farrell that Feminists love to take out of context, and use to justify calling him a "rape apologist" and "incest supporter"?
/r/MensRights12/11/13 10:17 PM
17

There have been plenty of women leaders throughout history, and many of them started wars, and instigated terrible violence against their own people. Someone should make a thourough list, but for starters there's "Bloody" Mary I, of England - who burned people of different religion to her at the steak, if they didn't convert ; her sister, Elizabeth 1st, who beheaded her rivals and took England into war against Spain; Victoria 1st, who oversaw the violent expansion of the British Empire, which cr…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:21 AM
1

Exactly. How many people would raise a baby that OBVIOUSLY isn't theirs, clearly, to themselves and everyone else. That's the issue.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:02 AM
-5

I agree, the story doesn't sound unbelievable at all. Apart from OP's decision to raise a black baby. That's pretty dumb.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 09:56 AM
1

You need to watch the video.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 03:16 AM
1

You've ever once complained about that much more ubiquitously used term.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:24 PM
1

So you ARE similarly upset by the term "Grammar Nazi"? Or not? Your posting history would suggest not.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 12:54 PM
2

How is this a men's rights issue? Sounds like feminist propaganda to me.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:03 AM
2

All law is rape under patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 10:14 AM
3

Castration is a much more serious crime than rape.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:54 PM
9

Oh wow, feminist statistics. They're really reliable, I hear. You've completely convinced me. /s
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:55 AM
37

So... is there going to be a media outcry at the online "castration threats" made against men, the same way as there was a recent media outcry at the "rape threats" made against feminists on twitter? No? Thought not.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:26 PM
3

It's the most well known Father's Rights campaign organisation in the UK.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 10:32 PM
1

Is what reputable?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:18 PM
7

Why? It hasn't happened in the last 50 years.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:30 PM
9

You do?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:26 PM
59

The radical feminist in question is Julie Bindel, author of the article "Why I hate men" (amongst other misandric articles). She is not a mother, has no qualifications in law or social care, and has never seen the inside of a family court. She doesn't even have sexual relationships with men - yet is somehow an expert on families. All she has is radical feminist propaganda, and anti-male prejudice.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:11 PM
1

*Feminists now That's what I meant.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:07 PM
3

Meant to say "Feminists now claim", of course. Can't edit title...
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:34 PM
1

How do we know for certain that this is what these women are saying? Could someone sub title this video, and help it spread?
/r/MensRights02/09/13 11:23 AM
6

There is already a Wikipedia entry about this feminist, and her accusation that Newton's Principia is a "rape manual". It really looks like the feminists got to the page first, because the page does its best to paint the incident in the kindest possible light, without acknowledging that the author herself is deluded, bigoted and stupid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandra_Harding
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:03 PM
13

Are there going to be feminist interpretations of Newton's Principia and Fluid Dynamics on Wikipedia now?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:15 PM
9

Feminism actively blames men for women's problems too. That's why there is so much emphasis on feminism on changing men. It's not so much that they just ignore men and the fact men have issues, it's that they demonise men as the cause of women's issues.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 08:08 PM
10

FEMinism is all about women. The clue is in the name. It's gender equality, FOR WOMEN ONLY - i.e. if there is any field in which men are ahead, women need to be put ahead in those fields too. But if there are any fields in which women are advantaged, well feminists don't care about those inequalities. My favorite example of this at the moment, are the moves by the massive, well established, and well funded feminist organisation The Fawcett Society, to close women's prisons and have lighter sente…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:22 PM
2

The graph doesn't show that a higher number of sexual partners pre-marriage is linked to later marital breakdown,
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:41 AM
1

The title of that graph doesn't seem to correlate with the data shown. The graph just shows the number of women who have had specified numbers of non-marital partners, but the title speaks of a link between promiscuity and marital breakdown. A link is suggested, but not displayed... Or am i missing something?
/r/MensRights31/08/13 10:58 AM
4

I'm claiming it back.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:23 PM
14

That's like putting the KKK on the advisory board for the NAACP.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 09:30 AM
10

Oh shit.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 09:24 AM
1

Herp derp
/r/MensRights24/08/13 02:21 PM
34

Men are three times more likely to be victims of violent crime than women. Women are just more paranoid about it.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:45 PM
13

Feminists protect them. False accusations don't exist according to feminists. In fact, there are even more abusers out there than the system can deal with.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:32 PM
4

TIL men should pay for dates because women spend all their money on trying to look artificially pretty. Thanks feminism. /s
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:15 PM
3

appropriate respectful fathers This does not exist anymore.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:09 PM
12

As well know, only women can be trusted with children. Men are all wicked perverts. /s
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:08 PM
7

Because it's easier to trick a man to do it for you, by virtue of having a vagina.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:29 PM
9

Because female hypoagency.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:28 PM
82

Your mom is bigot.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:06 PM
20

This is proof of rape culture: we live in a society where rape is so normalised that these men won't even apologise for assaulting this woman, and act as they did nothing wrong. Oh wait it's the opposite. They apologise even though they did nothing wrong! I guess "rape culture" is just even more feminist bullshit. Who knew?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 06:54 PM
1

Feminism is not about equality. The actions of well established feminist organisations show this, as I've demonstrated here. And this is just one example.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:50 PM
1

Feminism is not about equality. The actions of well established feminist organisations show this, as I've demonstrated here. And this is just one example.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:50 PM
1

So you admit that feminism is not about equality?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:52 PM
1

So you admit that Feminism is not about equality?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:52 PM
1

The only hole that keeps getting bigger, are your pitiful attempts to deny that these feminists are not advocating for equality, merely female privilege. They are making gender inequalities worse, not better.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:23 PM
1

The only hole that keeps getting bigger, are your pitiful attempts to deny that these feminists are not advocating for equality, merely female privilege. They are making gender inequalities worse, not better.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:22 PM
1

I've provided you with ample evidence of their intentions, but you don't want to believe it, because it causes you cognitive dissonance. Here is another article about it.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:49 AM
1

I've provided you with ample evidence of their intentions, but you don't want to believe it, because it causes you cognitive dissonance. Here is another article about it.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:49 AM
1

The truth, which you are attempting to deny, is that feminist organisation the Fawcett Society is advocating for women, in an area that they already enjoy considerable advantage, effectively making gender inequalities worse.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:39 AM
1

The truth, which you are attempting to deny, is that feminist organisation the Fawcett Society is advocating for women, in an area that they already enjoy considerable advantage, effectively making gender inequalities worse.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:39 AM
2

The truth is that feminist organisation The Fawcett Society is pushing to advantage women in an area that they already enjoy considerable advantage. Currently over 90% of prison inmates are male, and the feminist organisation seeks to increase that percentage. The article states - "Women should not be sent to prison and should instead serve community sentences, according to a new report by the Women's Justice Taskforce."
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:13 AM
1

Women should not be sent to prison and should instead serve community sentences, according to a new report by the Women's Justice Taskforce.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:12 AM
1

It's working fine, but sadly you seem to have your fingers firmly jammed in your ears. Feminist organisations - like the Fawcett Society - work to favour women only, in many cases increasing gender inequalities between women and men, to men's disadvantage. If they didn't do this, and genuinely worked towards real gender equality - as even the Fawcett Society claims to do - then there would never have been any need for the MRM, and this conversation would not be taking place. As further evidence …
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:05 AM
1

If you read the links, the information you ask for is there. The impetus to shut women's prisons comes from the Fawcett Society, and the chair the the women's justice task force was also president of the Fawcett Society. The Fawcett Society is entirely behind the push to do this. They are a feminist organisation, pushing for greater gender inequality, because that inequality is one that favours women (currently less than 10% of the prison population is female, and they intend to reduce that even…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:01 AM
2

Doesn't matter - the important point is that they want to advantage women in an area where they are already advantaged: less than 10% of the prison population is female, and they intend to reduce that even further. Hence feminism is not about equality.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:59 AM
2

Doesn't matter - the important point is that they want to advantage women in an area where they are already advantaged: less than 10% of the prison population is female, and they intend to reduce that even further. Hence feminism is not about equality.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:58 AM
1

Your equating the Fawcett Society with the feminist movement is a bit silly and frankly Your denial that the Fawcett Society is a feminist organisation is completely ludicrous, frankly. They are the largest feminist advocacy group in the UK, and produce many of the feminist statistics that are repeated by feminists the world over. They produced and popularised the slogan "this is what a feminist looks like", and every new member gets a T-shirt with this slogan printed on it! Did you read that ri…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:44 PM
1

You're the one shutting off your mind, sweetie. The Fawcett Society's justifications for the closure of women's prisons - i.e. making prison a gender specific punishment, for men only - are entirely feminist. They argue that since society is patriarchal, and unfairly advantages men, when women commit crimes, it is only out of desperation, in a society that is geared against them. The solution, then, is to help women more, rather than punish them in a society that already punishes them enough. Pe…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:30 PM
1

The Fawcett Society are one of the largest and most well established feminist organistations in the UK. They take their name after famous first wave feminist Melicent Fawcett. They even printed and popularised the "this is what a feminist looks like" t-shirt, complete with Fawcett Society logo, famously worn here by Bill Bailey Do you still honestly want to try and argue they are not a feminist organisation?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:52 PM
1

Your previous statement is wrong. The Fawcett Society ARE a feminist organisation. If you disagree with their actions, then you, like me, are anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:55 PM
2

Already did that. Here it is again Also, here is a link to their original proposals
/r/MensRights13/08/13 07:49 PM
1

If you have enough options. Exactly this. The men that do that terrible work don't have any other option. But women don't do those jobs, because they have other options. So who is more oppressed? Clearly, the men.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:29 PM
2

The Fawcett Society are not fringe feminist extremists. They are one of the largest and longest established feminist advocacy groups in the UK. The impetus they provided to close all women's prisons has reached the highest level's of government, where feminist leaning politicians support it. This is the problem with little "feminists" like you - you don't know what the movement you support is actually doing.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:26 PM
1

They ARE the feminist movement! The Fawcett society are the biggest and longest established feminist advocacy group on the UK. This is the problem with little feminists like you - you don't know what the movement you support is actually doing!
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:22 PM
1

No, you clearly know nothing about what feminist organisations actually do. Instead you perpetuate the myth that feminism is about "doing away with gender based discrimination in all its forms." Please explain, then, why the long established feminist group The Fawcett Society is campaigning to close all women's prisons, when women already make up less than 10% of the prison population. They are actively campaigning for prison to be a gendered punishment, that targets men only. Explain how this "…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:47 PM
1

You claim that feminism is about "doing away with gender based discrimination in all its forms." Please explain, then, why the long established feminist group The Fawcett Society wants to close all women's prisons, when women already make up less than 10% of the prison population. They are actively campaigning for prison to be a gendered punishment, that targets men only. Explain how this "does away with gender based discrimination in all its forms", feminist.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:43 PM
1

Feminism IS chivalry. You clearly didn't read my previous post.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:34 PM
1

Feminism isn't about flipping patriarchy into matriarchy, it's about doing away with gender based discrimination in all its forms. No, feminism perpetuates gender based discrimination targeted at men. Feminism advocates for increased female advantages in situations where women already fare significantly better than men. Take the moves by the long established feminist group The Fawcett Society to close all women's prisons, when women already make up less than 10% of the prison population. They ar…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:27 PM
9

Feminism advocates for increased female advantages in situations where women already fare significantly better than men. Take the moves by the long established feminist group The Fawcett Society to close all women's prisons, when women already make up less than 10% of the prison population, and for women to receive lighter sentencing, when females already undergo shorter sentences for the same crimes as men. The realisation that feminism is not about equality, but female privilege, is nothing ne…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:52 PM
9

But she says nothing to imply that her ideal world would have men less than equal. Yes she does, she states : - My feminist activism involves privileging women's voices over men's voices. She is all about privileging women over men, because she believes - as feminist patriarchy theory states - that we live in a society that is institutionally violent against women. That is the premiss she is working from. However, it is completely false. Men are three times more likely to be victims of violence,…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:10 PM
2

This is just so hilarious!
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:17 PM
1

During war time. 99.9% of war deaths are male. War is when male disposability is most clear. Men go to fight and die, women stay safely at home and live. Men protect women.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:58 AM
1

Women tend to simply view work as work, not "men's work" and "women's work". [citation needed] This doesn't fit with lived experience. The professions in which you are most likely to die are dominated by males. Women simply do not want to do that work. This is why 97% of work related deaths are male.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:57 AM
1

No, male disposability is evident, not just in the inequality in workplace deaths (97% male), but in the disparity in care men receive from society. For example the high suicide rate of males (75% male) which is barely mentioned in the media, the fact 90% of the homeless are male, the fact that 90% of the proson population are male, and the fact that funding for male health issues - 8 times more spent on women's health, compared to men's - despite the fact men die younger, yet retire later, than…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:54 AM
1

"Repressing women" is not men keeping all the dangerous and health destroying work for themselves. To think that it is, is just stupid.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:06 AM
1

No, men don't repress women at all. That's a feminist fantasy.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 10:37 PM
1

Chris who?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:22 PM
1

I'll have to look it up.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:09 PM
1

the fallacy that women aren't good enough to do those jobs... No, it's the belief that women are too precious and valuable to do those jobs, while men are merely disposable. It's not misogyny, quite the opposite.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:08 PM
1

I'm saying they would suddenly find they had to do a lot of very hard work they didn't realise they were relying on for their survival (if men were suddenly to disappear).
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:07 PM
1

Exactly. That's why I said, for a lot of men, it would just be business as usual.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:05 PM
-1

There was no intentional reference - but I'm interested in graphic novels, so I'd love to know what you thought I meant?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:15 AM
2

Read this
/r/MensRights10/08/13 10:24 PM
8

Females are massively unequally under-represented in the prison population.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 08:39 PM
9

It was never a movement based in stoicism, rationality, and a commitment to self honesty. Hysteria, hyperbole, emotional manipulation, and feminism go hand in hand, however. It's a movement that seems to attract and foster sociopaths.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 08:37 PM
0

No, I'm saying biological differences makes life easier for women. Nobody expects them to do the dangerous and dirty jobs, all the heavy lifting that makes modern society function; Working in mines, drilling for oil, fixing and making big machines, building roads, transporting goods: these are all male professions, and also the most dangerous and unpleasant jobs, that women don't want to do. Without all that male work, society would fall apart. But there is little women do - aside from having ch…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 08:32 PM
20

It's also wildly inaccurate. The reverse is more likely true. Women need men to do all the dangerous and dirty jobs that they are unable or unwilling to - such as mining, drilling for oil, building roads, railways, etc. If all the men were to vanish off the planet (through a virus which only attacks those with Y chromosomes, perhaps) women would find their lives suddenly a whole lot harder. But if all women were to disappear for whatever reason, for a lot of men, it would really just be business…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:31 PM
2

It's probably being done on purpose. The atheism community was on the verge of becoming a viable political force, so is being sabotaged before it can gain more ground. Look into Cointelpro. What's happening in the atheist community has all the hall marks of it.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:52 PM
3

Suzanne Moore is basically a professional troll. She writes stuff that feminists like, and that pisses off and insults men, for a living. All her articles are like this one.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:35 PM
6

I ask myself this every day. In the UK, the Labour Party has has women only lists for years, has a policy that the party leader or deputy leader will always be a woman (regardless of ability), and has begun to hold women only cabinet meetings. And yet STILL some male MRAs want to vote for them!
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:10 AM
1

We've had this in the UK for years. The current opposition party do it.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:08 AM
3

I think he needs more therapy. A lot more therapy.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:16 PM
1

What do you consider those?
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:44 AM
1

Wtf are you doing in this sub then?
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:07 AM
2

It's the hypocrisy thats the problem, dummy.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:57 PM
3

"It's a woman's prerogative to be a hypocrite." I think thats how that phrase goes...
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:55 PM
1

This is a really great video.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:36 AM
5

I don't have 18 minutes man... can you sum it up? No I just want to read intelligent conversations about how to fix the mistreatment of men rather than talking about how unfair life is being a man. So watch the video.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:52 PM
3

Watch this video
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:48 PM
2

This might as well be misogyny circlejerk. I really couldn't care less if it was. Honestly. "Misogyny" is such an over-hyped and over-inflated term, that I don't give a shit about it. Anyone and everyone that advocates for men, in any way whatsover, gets accused of misogyny. It's just part of the terrain.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:29 PM
2

I disagree with the angry men here. There is nothing wrong with men being angry. If you think there is, then this is the wrong sub for you.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:15 PM
2

Why should I? To prove you're not just a feminist troll, intent on trying to make the MRM look bad by taking an out-of-context quote from a book you haven't even read, and know nothing about, and using that to try to make the entire MRM look bad - "see, this is what they all think". I've been involved with the MRM for years, run a men's rights group in my country, and never even heard the term "date fraud" before today; and YOU are the person that brought it to my attention. The only reason you …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:13 PM
3

Can you quote me something positive he has said, or are those the only two quotes you know? Go ahead, prove to me you're not a feminist troll...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:58 PM
7

This sub turns people off men's rights You're a feminist, aren't you? You can't have spent much time here, because this sub actually grows and grows. Clearly people are not being turned off men's rights by the content here. Take your sock puppet account back to SRS or whatever other feminist hole you like to dwell in.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:56 PM
2

Other person the friendzoning illegal guy, keep in mind that it had like 70+ upvotes before SubredditDrama came by. Who brought SRD here? That's a violation of reddit rules. Date fraud was from Warren Farrel himself where he mentions that he thinks that a woman who won't put out after a date is just as worse as date rape. I've read Farrel, and never seen this. Even if he has said words to this effect, and I simply never noticed it, it is not a major theme of his work or something he talks about …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:52 PM
3

Bullshit. I've been here for a long time, longer than this account, and an opinion like that is not a majority MRM view. It was only down voted after it went public. Look online for it and you'll see it was at a very high plus before OTHER subs came You do realise you are talking about vote brigading here? That's against reddit rules, you know.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:42 PM
4

That comment you linked to was downvoted more than anything else I have ever seen in this sub. It's obviously not a majority view here. It's hardly worth mentioning. And certainly doesn't justify the remark "This sub is filled with angry divorcees and rejected virgins" - if that were genuinely true, that comment wouldn't have been voted to below minus six hundred.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:36 PM
6

'make friendzoning illegal' post or anything to do with 'date fraud' Never have I ever seen anything like that in this sub, in all the time I have posted here. But what does 8 times less spent on men having to do with the rates of getting cancer and the ages on which they get it? There are test for prostate cancer which you can't get on the NHS. If more money were spent, on tests, treatments, research, and raising awareness, then less men would die. It's really that simple. However, this just is…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:07 PM
9

Eight times less is spent on male health than female, so that might have something to do with it. I see you also post in r/againstmensrights.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:48 PM
10

Hospitals are run by the state in the UK anyway, so the "market forces" argument is irrelevant. To add insult to injury, men pay more than women in taxes in the UK (on account of working longer - retirement for men is later in the UK - and not taking as much time off for family and health reasons as women do). So men pay more in tax, to pay for a services which treats them worse. Where is the media outrage at the injustice of this? There is none, because the media has a huge feminist bias, of co…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:22 PM
22

If men were likely to get the help they need from the NHS, they would probably use it more too. The discrepancy in funding means that in some areas of the UK, millions of pounds go to female health centres, when none even exist for men.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:24 PM
21

Hospitals are state run in the UK, where this article is from. So, you are wrong. This is institutional bias against men; one that reaffirms the MR concept of male disposability.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:10 PM
23

Eight times less is spent on male health than female.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:07 PM
64

To keep them oppressed for even longer! So evil!
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:56 PM
4

No, your "friend" is the fanatic. He defriended YOU, because he couldn't stand that your opinion was different to his.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:19 PM
14

Who in their right mind actually trusts this guy anymore?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 03:42 PM
4

You could at least have thrown some facts in there - men are 97% work deaths, 99% war deaths, 90% prison population, receive 60% longer sentences for same crimes, 75% suicide cases, 3 times more likely to be victim of violent crime, 90% of homeless deaths. Etc.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:56 AM
7

OP must be arguing with feminists for the first time. Otherwise he'd know the is normal behaviour with feminists. It's what you get if you try to engage them in rational discussion.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:50 AM
1

U/Enlightmen has been posting pro feminist bullshit in this sub for months now.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:26 PM
3

What's the janissary theory?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:18 PM
-6

Why is u/EnlightMen still being allowed to post feminist shite in this sub?
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:17 PM
1

TL;dr
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:39 PM
2

The men's rights movement is a movement solely dedicated to inequality. Judging by the language you folks use, like 'feminazi', your patron saints aren't liberals and progressives, but rather arch-conservatives like Rush Limbaugh. Did you know he was the one that came up with the term feminazi? What other parts of your movement do you think he came up with? Attacks on prominent feminists are conservative, attacks on things like reproductive rights are conservative; these are both all Limbaugh an…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:36 AM
10

This has been known for ages. Men just don't report their partners for abuse as often.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:11 AM
1

You must be new here...
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:57 PM
1

No, not by legal definitions, in the UK.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:10 PM
0

What if someone puts your dick in their mouth, without your consent? That's not forced to penetrate.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:04 PM
-2

It's still a violation of will, with regard to sex.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 01:03 PM
1

Those don't involve penetration What's so unique about penetration that it is the only form of sexual violation that bothers you so much? Is the reason, simply because, only a man can penetrate? Why is not "enveloping" a matter that bothers you? telling her he was doing it because she was his wife and he'd do what he wanted is different We only have her word he said those things. No proof exists. The words sound like a fantastic way to play the victim card, don't they? Would the same words carry…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 12:16 PM
2

No, paternity fraud is when a man is accused of being a father of a child which is not his. Men being made fathers without their consent is an everyday occurence.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 11:04 AM
7

"Please don't make me a father" Is that rape too? Then there are an awful lot of raped men out there.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:57 AM
-3

Have you never had something happen during sex (or any other time) that you didn't want to happen, and had asked not to happen, but your partner still did it? "Don't scratch my back"; "Don't give me a hickey"; "Don't tell anyone we did this" Are all of those rape too?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:24 AM
29

Nail. Head. Hit.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:28 PM
0

I never thought it would happen to me. I never thought being a man would cause me so much trouble. And yet you know enough to post here? Who ELSE did you think this was going to happen to? You've been very stupid.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 12:20 PM
3

This is all standard feminist stuff. That's what you expect. If you take a look at any of the feminist facebook or tumblr pages, for example, they are full of slogans and posters such as these, and many far, far worse.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:09 PM
3

I wonder what SRS will make of this?
/r/MensRights13/01/13 10:30 AM
4

Yes indeed it is. They are both very prominent feminist writers in the UK.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 10:29 AM
17

Feminists don't want to hear opinions from men unless they are the same as their own.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 10:18 AM
2

Some commentators have said we live in a "post feminist" era. But it's not true. Feminists are now in positions of power and able to influence policy making. They just don't necessarily admit that that's what they're doing.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:54 PM
1

I just question your assumption that any woman will automatically love her foetus.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 12:34 PM
-11

What? If pregnant mothers loved their fetuses, women wouldn't campaign so hard to make abortion easier and more socially acceptable. Your assertion is based in nothing.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 12:34 AM
-7

Your sister is shallow and stupid, and probably shouldn't be having children at all. But she's a female, and that's one of the special privileges she gets. She is entitled to a child, whether she is able to be a good parent or not. I wouldn't bother trying to changer her mind, just cut her out of your will. There is no point in any of your resources going to her. It'd be a waste.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 12:32 AM
0

SRS only exist on reddit. The MRM is global. What's your point?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:19 PM
-1

This is the internet.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 12:13 AM
0

We're not on TV though, are we.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 06:51 PM
1

I disagree. As a once PC left-wing feminist myself (when I was young and naive, in my late teens and early twenties) , I find the term totally appropriate. Think of a better term, then, that encapsulates the same meaning as "pussy pass" and use that instead. Criticising other for what you believe is inappropriate language just wastes energ. So think of a better term, use it, and see if it sticks, the way "pussy pass" has.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 01:27 PM
4

The term "misogynist" is so over used its become meaningless. It happens any time anyone says something feminists don't want to hear. It's just water off a ducks back to me now. The only way to free yourself from being tied down by this pretty lies and politically correct bullshit - like gulliver being tied down by the tiny yet tyranical Lilliputians - is not to care. Pussy Pass is real, feminists just don't want us talking about it, because they campaign for even more lenient sentencing on wome…
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:59 AM
-1

Pussy Pass is real, but feminists and manginas don't want us talking about it.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:55 AM
-3

Spoken like a true mangina. Don't censor the MRM you cunt.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:49 AM
-2

Bollocks. Feminists label anyone that doesn't agree with their flawed thinking and misinformation a "misogynist". It's just a term you have to get used to being thrown at you, if you advocate for men. I know a very active MRA who deliberately shuns such terms, yet feminists still use it against him, and compare him to a neo-nazi. And look what happened to the very softly spoken and polite ex-feminist MRA Warren Farell in Toronto recently. So fuck off, cunt.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:46 AM
8

It does to littlethistle little politically correct brain. To him, that cancels out the bad, neutralising it. He thinks, "It can't possibly be a hate crime if its not done by a white person. Only white people can hate."
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:42 AM
-3

Pussy pass is a well established MRM term, and it's a totally appropriate way to describe the pro-female, anti-male discrimination that takes place in the legal system. The discrimination should offend you more than the term.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:39 AM
-5

Female hypoagency, is the reason why this is socially acceptable. Women are very accustomed to dodging responsibility for their own behaviour according to social norms. There as an expectation (encouraged by feminism, actually) that women are objects that are blameless, while men are agents, who have to shoulder responsibility. Watch GWW's video on the subject to learn more.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:23 PM
4

high on feminism
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:09 PM
7

There is not really much difference between radical feminism and other feminists. Patriarchy theory was once a radical feminist idea - yet now all feminists believe in it.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:08 PM
2

You oppressive patriach!
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:06 PM
2

Here is his blog. http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com/
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:51 PM
1

It's still stupid of you to denounce this article as a lie, when it is completely true.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:50 PM
1

The Sun.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:39 PM
2

There are men and women involved in the MRM. That poster was a troll (and has now removed their stupid comment).
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:35 PM
2

I'm from the UK. It's actually pretty stupid that many people reflexively reject any story that's run in the daily mail, simply because it's the daily mail. All newspapers should be viewed with some degree of skepticism, not just the daily mail. They all have their biases. And the daily mail isn't as bad as some newspapers. In many ways, it is the equivalent of the Guardian, except with a "right wing" bias as oppose to the Graun's "left wing" bias. But the same people that complain about the dai…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:33 PM
3

Care to find another news site that's running the story then?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:19 PM
4

So you think this article is a lie? You think there is no such person as M Bahanan, and he's not forming a pro-male party? It's all just made up?
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:50 PM
2

It was voted newspaper of the year for 2012 at the Press Awards, in England. It beat all the other newspapers in the UK to the award. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/mar/21/press-awards-winners
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:09 PM
6

It's also the Internet, which is not a credible source for anything. /s
/r/MensRights30/12/12 02:20 PM
10

Here is his blog. http://fightingfeminism.wordpress.com
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:14 AM
3

Your response is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:31 PM
3

Fuck off cunt.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:24 PM
-1

I think you're right JTO, but reddit has its rules, and the admin enforce them. The admin don't seem particularly sympathetic to mensrights anyway.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 03:34 AM
1

It's a shame feminist groups oppose equal parental rights for fathers. They created this "unfair" situation. Just another reason no sane, rational, thinking person would support feminism.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 02:44 PM
3

Yes, yes they are.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:04 PM
2

Why did she do an AMA there of all places? In the snake pit?
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter