TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sir_Fancy_Pants Archive

View 8 posts and 731 comments by Sir_Fancy_Pants on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Oh dear god you still don't get it do you. I cant be bothered anymore, you go ahead applying p values blindly you will be in good company as its a very rookie error, if you cant understand appropriate statistical techniques to suit data types, thats your problem not mine.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:04 PM
0

The P-value tells you how likely something is to have occurred by chance, given an expected value. In this case, the null hypothesis is that both sexes have the same probability of being unemployed following graduation, and that's something we can clearly disprove given the extremely low p-value Lol and this is why you are such a moron, in your understanding of this problem you think modelling the sex difference on a single data set, not a random sample in one department in the same university i…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 08:54 AM
0

You are the cliche idiot who is blindly applying p values irrespective of experimental technique/methodology or understanding what data is being assessed. So funny and tragic, you are so stupid and wrong it should be criminal. Using your utter failure of understanding the value of p values and what they do and do not tell you, you would claim bacon gives you cancer is true, based on the logic of a sample of 98 people who have never eaten bacon none had cancer compared to 431 who had eaten bacon …
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:49 AM
0

If you think I'm going to waste my time to try and convince someone who thinks a sample size of 98 is statistically valid in all forms of data analysis, you are gravely mistaken. You carry on believing that a sample size of 98 is valid in all cases provided the data is random, you will be the one who professionally will get his arse shredded by someone who isn't so stupid that they think a one size fits all is applicable to all data. You are one of these typical morons who thinks because he has …
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:17 PM
0

I am genuinely embarrassed for you. You know even less than i initially gave you credit for.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:49 PM
0

Again you have no idea what you are talking about, the fact you think a sample size is irrespective of what is being measured/recorded shows just how idiotic you are. Its a common mistake with people who don't understand statistics, you don't even understand what is being investigated, and probably think anything with a sample size of 30 or over is significant because you don't understand the difference between measuring someones blood samples in an experiment and asking them lifestyle choices a…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:12 PM
-4

Oh the fucking irony. Im not the dipshit who doesn't understand reporting an event occurring in a data set with a frequency of 22% ( ill remind you a quarter is 25%) is relevant when compared to another dataset which is 4 times smaller. Once again you are one of these dumbshits who doesn't actually know anything at all. Then thinking a sample size of 98 makes sample bias negligible is absolutely hilarious. People like you should never ever comment on statistics or use them, you are simply too st…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:53 PM
1

The " I don't have a boyfriend, so I'm going to ruin everyone who does sex lives" law passed by feminazis
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:03 PM
1

To be fair my encounters are almost always in line with this, she is constantly screaming" yes oh yes, oh god yes" i take that as consent
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:01 PM
1

The real answer (people will try and deny because they dont like it:) Because sexual value and identity/utility is 90% of a woman's public persona in the media, men are seen as more and so the violation is seen as less. You will no doubt deny this, but its true, women are rarely if ever given prominence on merit alone ( in the media) , but instead as eye candy, not because the media doesn't want capable women but because they are usually mutually exclusive, capable women are not usually good loo…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:00 PM
1

Number 8 lol, the very definition of hysterical. "Never help anyone, because ted bundy killed people who helped him".
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:55 PM
2

The bugger is the cop has to respond, the fault lies with the reporter. If you were a cop and someone telephoned in that a "suspicious man is waiting by a daycare" and you do nothing and that guy is a pedophile and does something you get destroyed by the media and authorities. If i was the cop i would politely and friendly chat to the guy, "hi there do you mind if i ask what you are doing?, do you mind if i just run a few checks to ensure all is above board, just as a formality etc, thats great …
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:49 PM
-2

You can't quantify fault, there is no universal unit of responsibility that can divy up into a 50% score, i see an abuser and someone who has made the choice to accept the abuse because they want the benefit of whatever is gained from being in that relationship. Its YOUR position to claim people are not responsible for their judgements and actions using "im psychologically damaged/unstable" something which is equally applicable to all parties. If someone hits you and you decide to stay, you are …
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:34 PM
0

I don't think you understand how manufacturing works, technology means that your product or service requires less "manpower" as technology gets better and better. Don't believe me? You really think a 1960s office would take the exact same amount of workers and time to erect than if done in 2014? Technology exists for the reason of minimising labour and "manpower", Its just like industrial revolution, but with the microchip and robotics rather than steam power. Its inevitable.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:50 PM
-2

Lol oh the fucking irony. If you actually knew about psychology you would understand what numerous inherent cognitive biases everyone posses You would also understand how these biases are equally valid to the abuser. So if you want to factor in a psychological "get out of responsibility" model or use psychological weaknesses/leanings/biases to validate sympathy/support to someone who in purely logical terms is not a victim. i.e justify empathy due to the victim being a victim of ones own psychol…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:32 PM
0

I don't blame feminists for the change in masculinity in society, its an inevitable reality of technology and progress. The word we live in today doesn't need as many strong roles or physical or dangerous work as societies in the past. As technology moves forward and society becomes more stable mens role of grizzled provider and protector becomes less significant because each of us lives a more stable information rich life. Or in simple terms, factories are being replaced with offices.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 03:05 PM
-6

I have genuine empathy for people who are genuinely in positions that are not their own doing/creation/contribution. So someone forced against their will imprisoned on threat of death to them or their family/loved ones, absolutely one would do whatever he could. Likewise someone tried to escape someone who is attacking them for the first time, absolutely, you have my support and sympathy. But its a god damn insult to expect me to think of you as a victim because you decided to stay with someone …
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:54 PM
-3

Its obviously not as "cut and dry" as my example, but ultimately that is the meat and bones of the principles involved. If you accept that other people have compromised your ability to be responsible for yourself you can equally apply that to the abuser. I.e the same logical justification applied to someones position of victim "it crept in over time, they made me into the person, they changed my values/beliefs/personality" can be equally valid when applied to the abuser. You are responsible for …
/r/MensRights14/09/14 01:52 PM
-4

Oh dear god please tell me you are joking, your comment shows you don't understand statistics at all.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 01:41 PM
1

Bullshit, men like other nice men, no one likes the " out for himself type" The difference is self declared "nice people" who are " overly nice" as it appears false and only a manipulation tactic to better themselves. Everyone loves a guy who is a decent bloke, be they man or woman, but nobody respects the "nice guy" because its just false and obvious manipulation. Genuinely decent people don't tell you they are nice or regale you with stories of how nice they are or situations that show them fa…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:16 PM
-10

This pisses me off ( i hate bullies/abusers) but i have no sympathy for the victim , be they man or woman (unless they stay because they are under threat of death or in genuine fear for their lives). Living with domestic violence where you are able to leave but do not for reasons of convenience or love makes you complicit with your situation. Like an eccentric millionaire allowing you to drive his ferrari or use his house on the condition of he can spank you, if you don't accept the deal don't d…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:06 PM
1

Cant wait to see her next article. "SHUT UP, i have trouble making friends, what are YOU going to do about it!!!" Its about as logically valid
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:49 AM
7

Thats funny i read it as " 8 reason why men should avoid a career-orientated woman" no matter how many times i read it, thats what it says. Just as well she has more say over what i like/value/want/desire than i do.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:48 AM
1

Exactly, how is it men's problem? Her loneliness is her problem and will be forever her problem until she realises if someone has what you need, you need to convince them you have value and actually have something they want/ need, over someone else She is like someone with a shop who has prices that are all outrageous overpriced compared to everyone else. And complaining that the customers need to "realise and understand" they need to pay more to get your items, despite the same and often even b…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:44 AM
1

If you want to minimise all exposure and risk, stay indoors in a bubble. Life is risk. These kind of things just make people look like idiots, unless its an epidemic like the plague or something where a temporary behaviour can allow you to survive it, or something like aids where a minor change such as condoms can radically increase your protection, in an AIDS riddled community.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:38 AM
1

Lol looks at picture of author, red hair, fat, thick glasses, conventionally unattractive. I would pay good money she has dabbled in wicca too. She is a walking cliche
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:35 AM
5

Please don't do this, not only does it give them credibility they don't deserve by addressing them, it also makes you look batshit crazy and bitter. I absolutely hate that woman, as i do anyone who deliberately lies for a bullshit agenda, but if i got a leaflet about it it would make the author look butthurt and weak. You will just look idiotic I assure you, despite being right and it being true.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:33 AM
3

You forgot height shaming.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:53 AM
1

By the same logic if a case occurs to a man by a woman the same is equally valid, i.e the proof only requires 1 case for 3 .5 billion people. Fucking moron.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:51 AM
6

This is actually genuinely hilariously funny. Its a completely and utter exposure of massive hypocritical thinking. The introduction is a complaint that nobody wants to be with them, and then what follows is a list of "like it or lump it" issues that basically have the tone "deal with it". Does this dopey bitch understand what leverage is? This is like me complaining to you that no one is buying my used car, followed by a list of all the points that people need to "deal with" and refuse to compr…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:49 AM
1

Because relatively rape between men means sodomy.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:33 AM
-5

You are an incredibly bad statistician if you think percentages of extremes are comparable from one sample relative to another same that is over 4 times larger. Exaggerated to extremes to demonstrate why. 2 men versus, 8 women, 0% of men have ever ever been in a car accident, where as 12% of women have. The actual data just has one woman who has had a car accident which is more likely in a group of 8 than 2. What university did you go to exactly?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 10:25 AM
0

You are officially an idiot, you cant even understand the issue.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:56 PM
0

Ok ill call your bluff and call you a liar having visited the source myself. Post the data that divides each age range into sex from data source (1) If you weren't such an inexperienced idiot, you would see exactly why i can legitimately call you a moron. You cant reference another data set as its irrelevant, you must now show me using source 1 which is what is claimed how the age group in the 45-64 age group only, is less than 51% using only the data in source 1. Good luck,
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:00 PM
1

The point is you cant claim that because you don't know what the data actually is.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:36 PM
3

Personally i think provided they share a handful of core values, i.e doesn't cheat, isn't dishonest, etc. Everything is negotiable, I.e they can be unsuccessful but very very funny, it all depends. People with rigid uncompromising lists are always people to avoid.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:10 PM
0

Hahaha its hilarious seeing a graphic designers critique. Now let me tell you from a former analyst/statisticians point of view. First of all you are completely wrong, while it is assumed the data is misleading you don't actually know it is. Women could be the primary victims in the highest demographic by 1% provided the summation of all other age groups combined is inline with the 3/4 split. All your remarks of visual size etc are valid, and is actually something to always avoid using graphics …
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:06 PM
1

No deal, you want my value and service to impart and help your children, you better start taking my concerns and needs more seriously. Fathers are not optional extras you cant just get some guy to do a few days a week. All parents need to form a stable committed platform to raise children. The more men help mentor fatherless kids, the less important fatherhood becomes, as it just becomes a commodity that can be achieved by any random stranger. Kids needs fathers, and women should never see them …
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:49 PM
0

I don't think you understand what a common law marriage is, its a marriage in all but name, i.e you have made a legal declaration in writing to honour financial commitments etc via a contract. You can live with me for 50 years as my girlfriend if we are not married and have no kids i can kick you out of my house tomorrow assuming you have paid not "rent" if you have paid "rent"i can kick you out as soon as the rent period is up, i.e a month. But you have no claim or legal entitlement to any of m…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:38 PM
2

I saw a claim that said EVERYDAY, 1 in 3 women is killed by her husband or boyfriend/partner I.e the population of women is reduced by a 1/3 every single day!!!!!!! It wasn't a small typo either in some document it was a strap line on an "awareness poster" Fucking hilarious, if you don't even understand numbers or statistics don't use them. I also saw a shitty campaign you might have seen on reddit which was something like "80million people are living and dying in areas affected by armed conflic…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 02:29 PM
1

Contacting his work is a complete crock of shit, but the women are more right in this case, and the guy is being an idiot. Having desires for consensual sexual violence in fantasy or kinky sex, is not a green light for all sexual violence, you can like being tied up and dominated/spanked in the bedroom by agreement and role play that doesn't mean you can smacked and beaten against your will. People who like to Engage in kinky sex, its their own private business, its not anyone else's, society do…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:58 PM
11

Army sociologists lol. They must be the elite division above delta force and the navy seals. "shits got serious sir, we have no choice, send in the sociologists".
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:53 PM
2

Remember seeing this and exploring further, and under no context or any situation can this be defended, in its original context its as bat shit crazy as posted here on its own Its absolutely bat shit stupid and completely embarassing.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:48 PM
5

i dont think you quite understand, if you spend your efforts trying to appease and reason with the unreasonable you are a chump. if someone is so deluded they expect the world to cater to all their whims, and themselves to cater to nobody, its no skin off my nose, who cares what they think or do, their company or opinion or value to me is completely worthless. this isnt a question of someone getting their technicalities wrong, its about a fundamental core principle and value being on par with me…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:39 AM
3

she left out "can fly, shoot lasers from his eyes, fights crime etc. " seeing as she has dispensed with reality completely
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:58 AM
2

so the solution of what you are stating is very simple, don't care about these women or what they want or think.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:55 AM
5

relationships demand is 50:50, men are not obligated to pair up with anyone. women need and want men just as much as men need and want women, following bullshit like this will ALWAYS fuck up your chances of being happy.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:54 AM
7

that's funny I read it as "i cant get a boyfriend and choose to ignore my own failures and shortcomings and instead try to preserve my ego by blaming everyone else"
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:51 AM
6

it's called deluded self entitlement. the beauty is that people like this just hurt themselves no "real man" would go near such an obviously deluded moron. these kind of people who moan about a woman or man must be X are just lonely bitter idiots and looking to absolve themselves from their problems by blaming everyone else. you will have an incredibly hard and miserable lonely life you if genuinely believe your partner must fit a long list of non negotiable criteria, while you can do as you ple…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 08:48 AM
1

As stated your comments portray you as the poorly experienced lack of life skilled person you are. If only you could see how cringe inducing your comments are to normal people.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 10:21 PM
1

Good luck with that "grown up talk" if you are so idiotic you don't understand the difference between the statements " you are a ball-less virgin " and "all virgins are ball-less", anything you think or say is worthless. Your entire comment is a testament to your stupidity and immaturity, the fact you even don't get "not having balls" is a figurative expression, not a literal claim just magnifies your butt hurt idiocy. You are either heavily autistic or socially awkward/isolated or probably both…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 10:53 AM
1

Oh dear god your comment is cringe gold, i bet you are genuinely intimidated by other men on the street or in public places etc. I bet you don't actually interact or know "normal guys" you come across as a massively sheltered little precious sunflower. You genuinely (and seriously) make me cringe with your comments and hysteria. You are a weak little boy living in a mans world. You are going to have a very very hard life being such a sensitive and precious sunflower, no one will respect you, and…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 09:45 AM
0

It can be on the NHS if he was suicidal and couldn't afford it, a friend of a friend had facial plastic surgery purely cosmetically on the nhs i think.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:06 PM
1

Which is exactly what an idiot would say. Congrats on being that idiot, if you want to believe i have been " bested " go ahead, what ever helps you sleep in idiot land.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:50 PM
0

She could also have ebola and be trying to infect him, or be a zombie or perhaps a ghost, or perhaps she was in radio contact with a sniper who was tracking them and preparing to shoot. The worst thing about orccams razor is i cant actually cut you with it, perhaps she was reaching for that too?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:40 PM
1

You are clearly an idiot.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:34 PM
0

Doesnt matter unless its reasonable to assume she has a weapon on her at the time and intent on using it. I have seen the video its obvious she hasn't and isn't. You are just clasping at straws
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:25 PM
7

Welcome to the advantages of modern society, its a game that actually favours men, women's value as a partner (in general terms) is easier to consume elsewhere than the reverse. Or in other words, sex is easier to consume and source elsewhere than a relationship/commitment. Modern man has no real incentive to marry and nothing but disadvantage to marry. Why lock your life into a contract when you get nothing out of it?
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:03 PM
2

Hard to claim self defence, if she was a stranger then yes, because for all you know she could be a martial arts expert, but knowing who she is and her capability etc, knocking her out is extremely hard to defend as reasonable given the context. Rightly he should be prosecuted, if she was a stranger or had an implement/weapon it would be a different story.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:56 PM
1

Everything off limits is mainstream cool stuff, shit like this only flies in the nerdy world of dorks, which is what you are seeing.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:53 PM
39

All look retarded here. Better response would be: if you want prince charming you better be cinderella or snow white (or what ever) No point writing an essay you just come across as a jaded bitter loser. Desperate to be loved. Bollocks to that.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:52 PM
1

Lie with dogs come up with fleas, intelligent people don't waste their time throwing their pearls to pigs. No point arguing with jaded bitter crazy, the only way to win is not to play.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 03:06 PM
2

Are you trained at all? i teach (and obviously train) boxing and muay thai (as a hobby) and have been involved in them for years and years. As a result i happily let people take things into a physical confrontation, as thats my bread and butter, my domain, and people who push their weight around under threat of physical confrontation deserve to get their arse kicked, and im happy to provide that service. One just has to make sure you are genuinely fair and objective, so that they are the ones to…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:26 PM
0

There is no war here, nerdy social outcasts will always pander to sjw because they desperately need to feel progressive and "better" than others around them, because by all other metrics they are not. This sjw shite only exists in the harbour of socially awkward losers. In the realms of people who are actually successful capable and admirable this shit gets shut down immediately. You try pulling these sjw shite at an x games or windsurfing convention and see how far you get, these demographics t…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:21 PM
2

Absolutely but only if its apparent or majorly debilitating, if you are depressed or bi polar or whatever that doesn't count, you are still getting hit, only if you are learning impaired or physically impaired do you get a "pass" Also i grant temporary exclusion for the grieving or someone in a state of trauma, like just finding out your wife is having an affair or being bankrupt (if i know about it) If someone gets violent in that moment i would do my best to block and parry and not return. Im …
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:11 PM
1

What a load of hysterical crap, i have doors held open for me by women and i open doors of women too, its all about who is there first, what is convenient Gender never comes into it, i say "after you" with the door open to anyone if the situation calls for it, i have never seen a woman demand a seat or expect special treatment on a train or bus or whatever. These people exist but they are just a tiny minority of whack jobs, i have held doors open and been thanked and held doors open for me and t…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:05 PM
1

Yeah thats the guy,
/r/MensRights09/09/14 01:51 PM
2

You would be amazed how many people are effectively ball less because they think they cant defend themselves or hit back, because the attacker will "lie" etc. Im no ones bitch, hit me you get hit back, not matter who you are (excluding the elderly and children)
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:37 PM
3

Nice to meet someone in here with balls and a spine for once.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:26 PM
4

Anyone who believes they are entitled to cause physical pain as a result of emotional pain is a cunt in my eyes and is removed from my life.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:21 PM
0

Lol, whatever helps you sleep at night, just ignore the example i have clearly highlighted showing your stupidity. Stick your fingers in your ears close your eyes and delude yourself that you are right and its me who is wrong. Whatever works for you princess.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:20 PM
1

Nonsense its the foundations of a society and herd mentality, for people to have faith and invest in public and social faith as we all do by being law abiding productive members of society, we need to make examples and severe penalties for those that cheat the system. From pedophiles to murderers, if you have a mentality where your needs and "pleasures" are at the obvious detriment and suffering on the innocent then absolutely its a public good they are shown to suffer and to actually suffer . T…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:16 PM
-2

a complete worked example of your inadequacy. you incorrectly try and use pedantry to undermine me, yet are too stupid to realise that the use of "criteria" is deliberate to draw attention that it is highlighting the absurdity of there being only one criterion. i.e if you substitute criteria to criterion it implies that outside of reddit only one single criterion is usual/normal/standard. i doubt you are intelligent enough to understand, perhaps to aid you i can dumb it down to your level, imagi…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:04 PM
1

But if satisfaction is gained from her being subjected to misery summed overall it makes sense as the better option. I.e if 100 people get satisfaction from the misery befallen by someone who "deserves it" then overall its the better option (universe wise summed overall)
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:39 AM
1

Depends on your interpretation, if you genuinely believe the bible and that god is the architect of the universe and all laws (i dont) then its inherent in the will god, since that relationship of reaping what you sow falls under his creation. Besides "sayings" and religion are not data points they are sentiment, there is no validation in quoting someone,
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:24 AM
-1

Yeah imagine that, someone who doesn't use reddit as a sounding board to get self esteem and validation from anonymous people who only have to meet the criteria of "has internet connection". It will be a foreign concept to you I'm sure, perhaps if you had real world validation you wouldn't need to try and win friends and influence people amongst the anonymous teenage mass of online strangers with no life experience or formal education.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:12 AM
0

"An eye for an eye is making the whole world blind". Gandhi said it years ago, it's high time you caught up with the rest of us. There would be nothing "just" about Kelly Brook getting abused by a future partner. It would just be wrong. I can play that game too "you reap what you sow" ," if you live by the sword you die by the sword etc" I genuinely hope she gets to experience being hit by a partner i really do, likewise i hope thieves get their stuff stolen and murderers get killed by other mur…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:08 AM
0

There was a case of a uk millionaire (could be billionaire cant remember) business man who went to be a woman, and did full on surgery etc and wanted to live as a women as a full post op transexual, and then after a while after doing it (years and years) actually wanted to actually go back and has all the surgery to be a man again, which he did and lived as a man. Its more about the individual, one person does not make a strong case.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:56 AM
3

The disgust of domestic violence is the idea that you are entitled to inflict physical pain discomfort as a result of "emotional pain" I have heavy hands for anyone who thinks they are entitled to inflict physical pain on someone purely as a result of emotional turmoil/disapproval. This judgement is genderless she is as much a monster as the traditional "wife beater" conceptually.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:53 AM
-2

Lol brilliant, only in the mind of a moron can you think you lose the argument despite being right. I feel sorry for you, you clearly care or think reddit consensus has some value or validation purpose. And let this cloud your ability to assess information. Just fyi, 99% of the dipshits on reddit could think en masse i am a complete and utter idiotic moron, provided the 1% that agree are actually respectable people that are intelligent who cares. I only care about peoples opinions or information…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:49 AM
2

Watch the video her quote means nothing when she is laughing and smiling about it.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:44 AM
4

They are different. Contexts she didn't knock them out, so its not like for like, but its still a fucking disgrace she should be absolutely disowned by the public.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:43 AM
-5

I remember a girlfriend who raised her voice at me once (has never happened again, i don't tolerate that crap ) refusing to apologise for the same reason "i am a passionate person, i wont apologise for being passionate" she stormed out after sensing i didn't lover her as much as she loved me, expecting me to run after her, i let her go, a week later she tried her hardest to come back, was given the coldest of shoulders and was devastated, i found a new girlfriend within the week. Welcome to livi…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:42 AM
2

But no one really rates women's tennis compared to mens tennis. When a uk man finally won wimbledon, it was "the first time in a long time" as they ignored the woman's victory because women's tennis isn't as "extreme" Winning tennis isn't really about the prize money its about sponsorship and deals of which men will generally make more unless the woman is very pretty. Sports and "celebrity" aren't really avenues to draw discrimination cases from as they are atypical and outliers by definition.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:38 AM
3

Rolling eyes and walking away, don't waste your time on these people. I dont approve of the MRA movement in many spheres and don't consider myself an mra at all, but "hate group" is just ridiculous. Feminists are not a hate group either, they are just many retarded morons.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:33 AM
0

Oh the fucking irony,
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:23 AM
0

Thanks mother,
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:13 AM
0

Lol you lose completely by using delivery instead of content for your assessment. If i call you fucking moron because you don't believe there is gravity on the moon, it doesn't invalidate the reality that there is gravity on the moon. Likewise you think conduct is a reflection or measure of correctness which categorically is a complete fallacy. How i chose to express myself has no bearing on the validity on the content. If you were more intelligent you would know this.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:13 AM
0

So by your idiotic logic if i kidnap you and imprison you in my home against your will i shouldn't ever go to jail. Idiot
/r/MensRights09/09/14 10:09 AM
-6

its not hypocrisy you moron, any more than hoping someone who kidnaps and falsely imprisons someone should be locked up by the state. Jesus Christ you are stupid. do you actually know what hypocrisy means? hoping someone falls victim to the crime they enact is not hypocritical at all.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:52 AM
-5

Is that because you are currently on your period? Don't worry princess, I'm sure you still are mummies special soldier.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:50 PM
-8

By engaging with them you give them credibility they don't deserve. Feminists are best ignored, not reasoned with.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:13 PM
0

The key is that this guy really is a moron, so there is no value or point in spending effort or time addressing all the points and issue into "simple talk" so his plebeian brain can digest it. If i was talking about quantum chromodynamics to someone and a 3rd party interrupted saying "nothing can exist that is smaller than a grain of sand, its all lies" i don't "lose" but rolling my eyes calling him an idiot and not wasting my time walking him through basic science. This is an open forum, not en…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:04 PM
1

Just to tag onto that watch "witchhunt" on youtube as narrated by sean penn, its disturbing beyond belief. In the words of martin luther, if injustice exists anywhere it exists everywhere.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:02 PM
1

Thought experiment would you rather be in prison for 10 years or be raped (by a women) I.e if they were your only options which is the lesser life impacting to you personally?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:00 PM
22

Bravo judge, boo hiss CPS. Dunno how to feel on this one, judges and cps are both essential parts of justice, an imbalance in one is catastrophic but glad the judge isn't a fool and calls out the bullshit that is exactly that.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:35 PM
-6

She looks like a deformed mannequin
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:33 PM
1

Well its a shame you cant separate content from delivery. If you are genuinely objective and assess things on their merits the delivery is meaningless. Calling someone an asshole or idiot doesn't invalidate anything, and i stand by my words, the guy is clearly a moron. Interesting how you think that delivery has significance on the merit of an argument. Personally i don't care how you phrase anything its the content that matters to me, call me an asshole or idiot all you like, but show me why an…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:30 PM
0

As stated : you are an idiot and have no value.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 06:14 PM
16

She was a "glamour model" a talentless idiot who only gained a name on the publics radar because of her tits, if there is any justice in the world she will end up with an abusive partner, try and play the victim card and get publicly ridiculed for the hypocritical cunt she is. She is a violent abuser, and her partners are better off without her, and she is a lonely and talentless trollop, she disgusts me in everyway.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:30 PM
5

If you take lessons on "how to act" from movies you will never be a man. Normal men don't try and emulate tv land, they do their own shit and have their own interests .
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:20 PM
2

So you really are that stupid then. Im not wasting my time walking someone through how business 101 works, if you cant understand how appealing to your largest market is different from deliberately excluding a demographic through your own implemented rule thats your problem not mine. You can think you are right all you like, you are an idiot, and consequently have no value to me or anyone else.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:15 PM
5

Are you genuinely that stupid you cant see the difference between a product catering to a main demographic that supports it and a service which deliberately excludes people. Any gender can buy any comic or porn or whatever other silly example you listed. but only a certain gender can use this taxi. If you are female and want to buy a comic book they will happily sell you one, they wont allow a man to take this taxi though, As for comic/porn or whatever if they could increase sales,by introducing…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 04:19 PM
1

Hey this woman knows her stuff after all she is a life coach, that dont just hand out certificates that mean nothing and let anyone be a life coach its an exclusive title on par with royal society professor.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:04 PM
2

Poor women living in poverty feeding their kids and working in their home, while the husband is out galavanting around as an industrial welder being burnt and being exposed to noxious chemicals and high risk working environments. Men need to man up, and start doing more, risking your life and damaging your health isn't enough, women need comfort and luxury ffs.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:46 PM
-1

I approve, there is no better way of ruining your business than deliberately excluding 50% of the market. Especially when men probably pay more taxi fares than women. I see bankruptcy in their future, and well deserved bankruptcy. I would never use them even if they "let me" because i had a women in my party, why go with a company that has patchy availability when you can get full coverage at the same price, its fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:41 PM
-1

Who cares, if you are a deluded moron who caters to the whims of sjw the type of games you probably like i don't care for anyway. Entertaining these batshit hysterical morons means your games get watered down and shitter, something you deserve. The rest of non nerdy-ball-less-virgins still enjoy our games regardless .
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:36 PM
1

Here is where me and the MRAs differ, i am intelligent enough to understand that men being socially allowed to be mocked and women not, is a result of mens capability and intelligence being undisputed, but women's ......far from it. I.e You can portray men as stupid because its not true and everyone knows it isn't true (just look at any history book) were as you cant mock women because.....well the expression "the truth hurts" is applicable, and women are massively insecure about themselves beca…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 08:26 PM
1

Glad i cancelled my license fee, i don't really watch tv anymore, but glad i am not paying for this shite. Only good thing on it was topgear
/r/MensRights07/09/14 08:16 PM
3

Good luck getting any other job after being a teacher for a while. It ain't gonna happen. Its a dead end path I earnt more than £40k on my first job after graduating uni,
/r/MensRights07/09/14 08:14 PM
5

Because its a crap job that leads nowhere, i could be a teacher if i wanted, but i have no desire to kowtow to shithead teenagers and their lifestyle No sane person would willingly want to spend all day with kids or teenagers. In this modern plugged in society. Bring back 50s schooling and perhaps we can talk, but its schools lack of discipline and options that would push men away, why would we want to deal with rowdy know it all kids when you cant teach them as you would if they were in the arm…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 08:13 PM
4

OMG who would have thought that celebrities who become prominent due to their attractiveness and mass public appeal, would result in mass sexual lust and curiosity of their naked body. Would never have guessed that. Fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:58 PM
-6

You really sound pathetic man, crying in your car because a women asked if there was something in it. I would simply say "yes there is.....drugs, what do expect a joint to have in it?"
/r/MensRights06/09/14 12:27 PM
7

If the rules don't respect you as an individual, you should have no respect for the rules
/r/MensRights06/09/14 12:23 PM
7

Parrot back her comments verbatim whenever she discusses a case regarding a girl being raped in the same manner (statutory) . Watch her call out her own bullshit,
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:08 PM
3

Very good video, i wish we knew exactly how the mechanism worked though, i.e how the body can pull what lever to choose which sex.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:41 PM
3

Total bullshit, the human brain is the most expensive organ in the body, everyone of our physical traits has been influenced by differences in male and female roles through human evolution, while obviously we share the same basic cognitive ability and skill set, efficiencies are not the same. If you stress test a male and female brain in different areas, you will see different results.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 01:30 PM
13

Thunderf00t always delivers, exposing stupidity and bigoted sjw morons. hanging them with their own rope. Guy is no fool at all. Would like to have a pint with him.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:40 PM
1

By this logic doesn't it suggest that you are safe/better off if you don't whore around? If you only eat 1 m and m in your life, 10% being poisoned isn't really a major problem
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:22 PM
1

Guys we need to give developers what they want, its our duty to support them because the other way round would be insane, Just Imagine that, developers actually creating products specifically for customers and their needs/desires. How ridiculous, it should be us who just give our money to developers to support them and their projects, not developers giving customers what they want.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:20 PM
8

"don't be that jew". Its about as acceptable
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:13 PM
4

This is not mens rights related at all. Women get a far worse deal in those states, a man being beaten for ignoring the rules is small fry, the entire justice system is backward and idiotic to everyone but especially women.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:11 PM
3

Thats fucking outrageous, and to think the stick that sky news reporter got for opening a suitcase out of shock and then realising to stop. Laughing at the grieving is a fucking absolute disgrace, people should have been severely reprimanded
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:09 PM
6

Who cares, if people don't want to follow basic safety advice to minimise their risks they will be the ones who end up being raped not me. As for policing other peoples conversations etc lol yeah you will win loads of friends and influence by being "that guy". Normal people don't rape everyone knows this, by inferring your friends are rapists or into rape culture you will end up having no friends, that is all. There is a reason normal people dont invite sjw dickheads in their group.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:07 PM
3

Secretly record it, register complain, if you get fired sue for unfair dismissal.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:01 PM
1

Wtf link/context?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:59 PM
2

Genuinely and sincerely i meant it, reddit is filled with morons who only agree or consider things if they like how its phrased, but you actually assess content over its delivery. You are a rare find as you genuinely consider and objectively evaluate what is being written rather than "this makes me feel bad so it must be wrong" I genuinely wish reddit was more like you, you are a rarity indeed.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 03:05 PM
2

Ah i see, perhaps you mean "expressed" rather than "constructed" As constructed infers "a product of" I remember an interesting psychological experiment where men would gamble on a known game of chance (i.e all participants knew that skill or ability has nothing to do with the outcome of an event, e.g drawing a random card) and they could bet any amount they wish, the study was monitoring how much people gambled when gambling with nervous men and confident men (actors). Overwhelmingly people gam…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 02:42 PM
1

Fucking right.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 09:03 AM
1

Yes you are right, both morally and legally.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:55 AM
1

What i always find hilarious about all these types of women panels is that they think "men cant ever understand" hence they all need to be women talking about women's issues, yet talk with authority and arrogance about mens issues or "how men are". Its total bullshit offensive to anyone with half a brain.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:45 AM
1

No its exactly what i expect, especially on reddit or the internet, no self respecting person gets "permission" unless its something crazy like a joint decision about moving or buying a new car that involves both.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:33 AM
1

Unless she is really a hero and deliberately giving awful advice so that the cheater gets caught immediately, E.g i dont condone murder but here is my top tip to avoid getting caught, do it in a police station.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:28 AM
1

You would get abuse and derision from me though. "Masculinity is socially constructed"---- utter shit, we have hard wired biological different selective pressures for millions of years. Men and women are different because of the different roles and value we had in all those millions of years of evolution. If you think gender is only a social construct or cultural factor, you are an idiot.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:22 AM
1

Yes i will tell you now absolutely everything nerdy and "alternative" will suffer from this SJW shite, because its only that demographic of socially awkward low status losers that give this bollocks any consideration. Athiesm/videogames/comics/technology all harbours where untalented unimportant idiots try and bolster their significance by accusing the system of being oppressive and themselves a struggling victim. You don't hear of any of this shit in windsurfing/skydiving/motorcycles/boxing/bas…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:07 AM
1

Illegal in the EU.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:05 PM
1

Thunderf00t a youtuber got a serious death threat and went to the FBI who he said were really good (bloody amazing) they will help.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:57 PM
0

Its ironic that this dopey bitches usage of obviously empty internet threats, to try an promote her bullshit agenda and get special significance or "victim status" actually makes me want to genuinely harm her.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:54 PM
2

You can use that exact poster regarding false rape accusations, Not all rapes are false etc..............
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:45 PM
-6

its still different, if you sent pictures to someone and they share them with the world, its different from you sending your pictures to someone and them being intercepted by a 3rd party
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:45 PM
3

absolutely, if someone rather than objectively and independently reviewing a game to inform my purchasing decisions gives me instead some SJW campaign about gaming culture, they deserve to lose their job and the company they work for take a bit financial hit. they are fucking twats and deserve no audience and no job. people need to bite back, keep the hate coming but make sure its directed to the right people
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:31 PM
1

looks like the onion has changed its logo again, this is absolutely fucking ridiculous
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:29 PM
5

this is nothing to do with mensrights at all, this is just /r/rshittyjobperformers
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:20 PM
1

I dont know about the guys "Leak" as i am not from the US but if the guy is actively sending unwanted pictures of his penis to people is completely different from someone having their own "stolen" i.e the violation of privacy is different, if he was sending it to his wife or something and they were intercepted then it would be the same as the stolen recent ones. They are different contexts from my understanding
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:17 PM
11

fucking pathetic, hurt them with your wallets, I have no tolerance respect or interest in a product or service that panders to SJW or SJW issues. i play games for.....games!!!!, i dont give a flying fuck about all this bullshit "harassment" either make a decent game or shut the fuck up. all this "sign this pledge" bollocks, is just a massive moron alarm. making games is your business and interest, social trends, harassment and peoples ideas thoughts or opinions are none of your business. develop…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:11 PM
1

Actually due to UK law, the police can and should prosecute her regardless of her partners wishes, there was a change in domestic violence laws many years ago meaning if police have enough evidence they can bring charges regardless of the victims wishes, (it was introduced to stop women filing charges and then cancelling them later).
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:56 PM
2

lesson learnt if this happens to you make sure its filmed and strike her back in the face hard. if the courts aren't going to implement justice you have to exercise your right to self defence
/r/MensRights02/09/14 12:15 PM
1

This is just bullshit nonsense, the real story is group of bored women in a working farm/commune want to be in the papers.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:56 PM
1

Sarkeesian's videos, which are extremely well-researched and insightful, Lol and david Icke is as intelligent as Einstein.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:54 PM
2

Lol i hope she spends every penny she has on legal fees and obviously loses.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:50 PM
18

No one likes competition
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:42 PM
2

This is because it isn't evident he is a shop owner or security, to someone walking by they just see a guy chasing a running family. And someone screaming, " they got kids" If he was shouting "stop thief" or "shoplifter" or "call the police" or anything to make it clearer people would be less likely to incorrectly act.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:40 PM
0

Never gonna happen, gamers and typical "gaming culture" is socially awkward loser territory, the exact territory that adopts feminist bullshit in the hopes their crush will finally like them. The things that make a man a real man who doesn't tolerate or entertain this whiney bullshit, also stops him from spending his time reading about newly released elves and dragon warrior fantasy game bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:05 AM
1

Wtf? This is ridiculous, its a tv show, its fantasy its got fucking vampires in it, lighten up. Its "make believe" there is no feminist propaganda, it is a fantasy show about vampires and high school, nothing more. Your question is embarrassing.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:56 AM
3

So? Due process allows anyone charged with a crime to cross examine the accuser/evidence . Women get cross examined in rape cases all the time. This is not a mens right issue, this is how law works 101
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:33 PM
1

Her tears of gravy can baste her chubby cheeks, Who cares, if deluded morons think you are "body shaming them" because you don't find them attractive so what, nothing they do or say will make any difference. If you think you need to convince them or get them on side, you will always be frustrated, the secret is to understand and recognise these people are meaningless to you, they can wallow in delusion all they like, if they think you are not treating them fairly who cares, they have nothing you…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:10 PM
2

Date non college chicks, and accuse and report any college chick who sexually touches you or tries to have sex with you without explicit consent.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:00 PM
1

And if you are looking for never coming across different opinions, then you shouldn't be on the internet.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:06 AM
0

Nope but the guy sounds very weak and probably broken. Dunno what i would do in that position but probably try and make it clear that i wouldn't tolerate that shit and neither would the people he looks up to or admires. Be they real figures or from literature, there is no nobility in not standing up for yourself or viewing yourself poorly, you cant just convince someone to grow some balls etc, but i would tell him, the choice is his, stand up for himself dump the bitch and build yourself up as a…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:19 AM
2

Yet boys end up out earning women and being more capable in the career market overall. School and education is not the be all and end all of success, there are many women that will be much better qualified than bill gates ever was, and have a better on paper "score" but it means nothing. Modern education is really just a reflection of obedience and effort, the same attributes and skills that make you more suited to knuckle down and do what you are told and be obedient makes you less capable to l…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:10 AM
6

Change "rape" to " false rape allegations" parrot back article to feminists watch them go ape shit, when you claim " dont teach me to get evidence of consent teach women not to falsely accuse". The only actual valid point of the 11 is the testing rape kits, if evidence is collected for a crime it should be tested, be it rape or violence or whatever, there is no excuse there, everything else is entitled ridiculous bullshit
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:49 AM
2

Rape is a violation of consent, consent by definition is subjective, there is implied written, etc etc. There is no universal definition of rape just like there is no universal definition of consent. Its a judgement call of what is reasonable, some batshit people consider looking at someone "stare rape", pointing out the subjective nature of definitions is the opposite of "black and white" thinking hence the (rightly deserved in my view) ridicule. But i will be more civil if you wish.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:19 PM
2

Someone who knowingly pursues intercourse or sexual assault against the known wishes of the victim or where no consent is implied or given at the time. And certainly where non consent is evident or implied. A woman getting drunk losing her inhibitions and sleeping with someone she wouldn't otherwise is not rape, unless she is so intoxicated she is incapable of movement consciousness or basic coordination. Which any party could clearly distinguish.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:14 PM
0

Lol the fucking irony, if you think claiming the definition of rape is not absolute and is subjective as a "black and white" statement thats hilarious, and rather stupid.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:08 PM
5

The solution: send them to virtual prison, Case closed.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:46 PM
1

Nothing its just funny,
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:44 PM
2

So when did the onion change its name/logo?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:43 PM
1

Your mistake is engaging and caring what a bunch of feminists think, its like arguing with the mentally deranged, you invalidate your own credibility by engaging them. Who gives two shits what they think, no sane person should.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:40 PM
4

What a fucking joke, if you publicly campaign and engage in activism you cant suddenly claim your own affairs that directly contradict your activism as private (within reason) . If an anti slavery campaigner, has a slave, its relevant and of public interest as much as the activism is. Its fucking pathetic.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:35 PM
-1

Its still subject to the same market forces, if they pull this shit and get away with and don't lose revenue its the customers problem. If there is a market for sjw free bullshit then it should naturally become a more useful service, if the gaming sites are being shit, support those that arent. Its the only Way the free market.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:04 PM
2

Is this idiot hour or something? This graph is completely meaningless and useless. Everyone will die of something at some point, total deaths is meaningless, its about lost quality of life years etc. E.g. 99% of men dying of prostate cancer at 89 isnt the same as 25% of women dying at 30 etc
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:01 PM
0

Doesn't bother me, the customer is always right, if a company spends real world investment on sjw bullshit and it doesn't sell (which it wont), they lose their money and games that dont pander to this shit will be successful. If they do make money then the market supports the product so no problem. The free market works both ways, i hate sjw bullshit if a game is littered by it, i will be less inclined to buy it, if others do buy it, thats fine (people are allowed to like different things) Sjw i…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:52 PM
2

Grade A CUNT right there, let all UK men be warned, she should be ignored by all both professionally and socially, total scumbag.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:25 PM
2

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha, read what you sow, sympathy and care = 0
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:22 PM
1

I assure you my "respect" for SJW has remained the same pre and post incident.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:13 PM
2

Its a game that doesn't favour women, sexual relations cam be substituted relatively easily outside college life, i.e you can date women outside college or hook up with random people in town etc, and satisfy your need for sex, but women's desire for relationship and commitment cannot be as easily substituted. Sex is more consumable than relationships/commitment, so women will rightly be left without anyone in the cold , if men as a default response treat college women with suspicion, as they see…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:54 PM
3

Yeah take that men, women rule and women have made the town better than it would ever be with men, women are the best, and men just ruin things. .....oh so please send some men because we need them, also they funded everything and work away from home supporting us and everything we do, but other than that, who needs men right?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:35 PM
3

Fucking batshit morons, if given the choice they pull this "victim blaming crap" i honestly no longer give two shits for their safety, if they think taking sensible reasonable precautions is "victim blaming" then let them do what they want, i will shed no tears for them. Easiest way to actually make these things take off and sell well is to actually i introduce them with manufactured controversy as banned because they are "offensive to men" e.g testing drinks infront of them accusing them of bei…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 12:13 PM
1

life is risk, each one of us lives under a sword of possibility that we could be killed or murdered by a mad gunman or drug addict or mugger or whatever at any moment, statistically its very unlikely, but to live in a mindset where you demand total and utter assurance that no such thing can ever happen to you is just fucking delusional. you dont see people marching to teach people not to murder, because we accepty its part of life, people will murder no matter what, but some dopey idiotic women …
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:08 AM
0

who says they need to reconcile, if someone is so hysterical they overplay the likelihood of rape and assume any and every man is capable/likely then that's their problem. the onus isn't on society to pander to peoples delusion or unrealistic expectations, as with any crime you can mitigate your risk factors as much as you can while still playing within the limits of normal social boundaries. people get raped, people also get murderer, living any kind of life has risk to it, normal people unders…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:03 AM
15

"Don't teach me to wear a motorcycle helmet, teach other road users to look out for motorcycles."
/r/MensRights27/08/14 09:39 PM
1

Copy article change genders, post elsewhere to another blog, get a huge shitstorm going, then reveal original source.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:42 PM
21

Time and time again, its been found to be victims misreporting what they have actually drunk, i.e claiming to only have drunk the equivalent of 2 pints but actually drinking 6. Some people obviously do get spiked and drugged, but its a rarity not as common as people would try and make you believe. Again its all under the " you must believe me unquestionably because i feel so" line of thinking these morons shovel.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:38 PM
28

" dont tell me to call 911, teach killers not to murder me" is about as credible as the rape argument, murders murder, rapists rape, a pop song or awareness campaign will have no effect on either. Its idiots being idiots.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:36 PM
59

"instead we should be trying to stop rape"...shit.....someone better tell authorities, as we need to make rape illegal, because surely these dipshits would have absolutely no point whatsoever if rape were already illegal. activists who don't understand crime happens, I'm all ears to her solution of how to stop rape happening, and we can then extend it to all other crimes like murder and everything else and the world will be a utopia, since you just need a campaign or some other shit, to get 100%…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 12:34 PM
1

I think its fair to say of you are someone who asks anonymous internet users for relationship advice, you are a failure regardless.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:47 PM
2

an overly optimistic view i fear
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:44 AM
1

there must be more details we don't know about, there is no way a judge can grant a "stranger" right to reside in someone's private property. either she pays rent or something that gives her a legit legal claim to reside there. if an ex or current girlfriend lived with me out of the kindness of my heart i can have her removed no problem at all, if she pays no rent/bills and has no legal contract such as marriage etc. she can legally be out the door in a minute. there must be more to this.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:15 AM
1

what better way of teaching people that you cannot assaign worth to gender by charging only one gender a fee and giving the other a free ride. its bullshit, and illegal in the EU, unfortunately this isn't the EU
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:12 AM
2

i refuse to play "victim Olympics"
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:04 AM
-2

We men have to stick together. Women sure as hell aren't looking out for us. in other words you think just because he is a man we should automatically support or believe him. you are just as batshit crazy and biased as the craziest of feminazis
/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:03 AM
2

Completely meaningless unless they specifically define their terms and definitions. I can do a study that claims 90% of people are victims of rape by defining rape in very specific terms. If you actually research these claims their definitions are almost always bullshit. The same happens with victims of any kind of "violence" or behaviour. The most accurate crime stats are murder, because the definition and paper trail is about as good as you can get. Never put faith in these types of studies. S…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:39 PM
1

How would you know if the sex you experience is actually only 50% of the sensation, since you cant compare it with being non circumsized.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:36 PM
3

The sensitivity of the organ is reduced due to its continuous exposure and it forms a harder skin, meaning sexual experiences are less sensitive overall, you had no choice someone did this to you, i would be angry as hell but luckily i am not in the US so most of us don't have a circumcised knob.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:35 PM
3

You need a new brother too by the sound of it, if some woman sexually assaulted my brother i would physically throw her out of my apartment to starve in the street.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:31 PM
4

The instant you argue with sjws you lose, don't legitimise their crazy by engaging them, they are a law unto themselves. They are irrational emotionalists, as are some MRAs
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:28 PM
9

Please tell me you ran a mile.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 06:08 PM
2

Depends who its representing and how it was obtained, it can be significant it all depends on how and what it answers. A sample size of 5000 for height for men in scotland can be perfectly legit, provided sample bias is minimised.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 06:07 PM
1

If you split society into two equal groups, and in one did her plan and the other carried on as normal, guess which one would be more prosperous powerful and able to destroy the other? Yeah no prizes
/r/MensRights25/08/14 02:42 PM
1

Yep, its very sad, but thats the price families will pay, if they routinely demonize and treat male figures as suspicious or not to be trusted as a default as a society. I could teach that kid to box and look after himself, no problem, but why should i put myself at risk or go the extra mile when people are so provenly hostile and suspicious of ones motives/actions. Of course the tragedy is that in many cases those who lose the support arent responsible but no sane man with a lot to lose should …
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:41 AM
0

The real reason feminists don't like porn is that it cheapens the service and value that they think only they can provide. If you have a belief and mentality you can get men to do what you want using sex, then another supplier offering better and cheaper services you will be hostile to. Feminists think they are a monopoly on sexual gratification, but they are a delusional union of an extremely low quality service (have you seen the typical feminist)
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:19 PM
1

Who cares what they think, im like you i wont compromise and would never date someone i knew had cheated. Literally who gives a fuck what they think about it, they are dead to you, their opinion on that matter has no value.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:14 PM
1

I would throw her out of my house, if she did that.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:12 PM
2

Wrong on so many levels (see what i did there)
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:04 PM
2

What do you expect its an idiotic product marketed at idiots.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:59 PM
2

I would be an ideal candidate for a big brother type thing, I'm well educated, have loads of cool things like 3d gaming systems, home cinemas jet skis etc and live by the sea, i can teach kids how to box etc and can do loads of mentor type stuff, from school work to Physical activity games etc. Unfortunately due to modern hysteria and the piss poor critical faculties who run these kinds of things, i wont be offering my services now or ever. The kids are the ones who suffer, but not my problem.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:57 PM
2

What better way to encourage men to become violent and take what the need by force.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 11:37 AM
1

You are an idiot show me where i called her a rapist?
/r/MensRights23/08/14 07:08 PM
2

Knew this would be thunderf00ts next topic, and i cant say i am displeased.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:55 PM
1

Who has dropped anything, my principles and ideology stay exactly the same. If you say and do stupid things you can expect lots of people to take offence and call you out on it, and your reputation to plummet into tatters. She is reaping the shit judgement and piss poor logic she has been sowing, she deserves to be shunned and ignored by anyone with a brain, she is an idiot a hypocritical moron, who violates her own stance, and now everyone knows and xan judge her for it and with hold opportunit…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:44 PM
3

To me it seems a " short cut" for people to try and get significance or platform for their voice because they lack any credibility or merit on their own talents. I.e feminism is a way of trying to magnify your voice by claiming you are an oppressed victim, so people automatically try and "make up for your shortfall" Thing is though people aren't stupid, and people who play the victim olympics just get ignored and dismissed, liked the boy who cried wolf. Feminism is a toxic brand.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 05:39 PM
1

To be fair though the penalty is much much greater. Foley killer risks deaths, colleges just kick you out of college.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:35 PM
1

Easiest way to blacklist yourself from any form of professional career, bravo. One google of this woman's name and all her credibility goes put the window, It also has the added bonus of being a massive warning to any man who finds her attractive and was thinking of being with her. She has done well to write herself off both professionally and personally. I actually thank her for that, much more efficient than wasting time talking or dating her.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:33 PM
3

Don't teach me to hide valuables and not walk down impoverished areas, teach others not to steal.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:30 PM
3

It's the automatic leap to any preventative advice is "victim blaming" that pisses me off. There is a fucking huge difference between "if you do x you put yourself more at risk from y" and "if you do x you deserve y". Ironically if you actually are crazy enough to remove warnings or advice to others because you are too hysterically to read or infer meaning properly, i actually do care less if you are raped.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:29 PM
12

If men en masse dont marry women, society will be forced to change either the marriage policy , or the women will need to amend their expectations. Just remember folks you have no duty to get married, you owe it to nobody, marriage is a joint decision to benefit both parties, if you feel it doesn't benefit you then don't get married, you don't have to justify it to anyone. In any relationship your needs and desires are 50% of the overall needs and desires, don't settle for less, if you do you de…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:22 PM
14

She deserves to be held accountable for her actions and positions, she was an activist who no doubt is trying to bring attention and awareness of issue in the public area you cant just suddenly claim your own personal actions and morals are irrelevant or immune to criticism. If i took the public stage to campaign against the fur trade, if you then saw me wearing fur in public that is a relevant issue and i deserve to be called out and hassled for it, i cant put up an invisible boundary and claim…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:07 PM
10

Presumably by her logic if you you misreport the number of sexual partners you have been even by one, all future sex is also rape, as you are withholding information making it not possible for informed consent. The women is a. Complete fucking idiot, i am glad this is ruining her life, its only a matter of time.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:51 PM
-1

But surely in the context of the title the first accusation of rape is a different definition to the definition of rape by zoe Q actions? I.e Its a false equivalency, to us, its only a valid comparison from zoe q's perspective.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:46 PM
2

I have seen this vid a few times but cant remember any rape claim, can you link to the time or part where a woman admits to raping her partner, thanks.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:30 PM
2

I agree its not hateful but the parody isn't funny or clever its just lame, which makes it less palatable, because they don't seem to have such a sense of humour as the original guy. It makes it awkward because you get the sense they think they are much funnier than they actually are, and think their response is brilliant, when its really just really completely unfunny because all they have done is change one thing and copied it so its basically one "joke" (which is kind of lame)
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:39 PM
1

Comedy is not something this woman can do. There is nothing funny about just repeating the video but substituting one area for another, she should have either over exaggerated or tried to imitate the original speaker. Its really quite cringey i think she only gets away with it because she is attractive, so it doesn't seem as carcrash as it would if she was some fat ugly weird looking woman
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:34 PM
1

Holding open doors i do for anyone, i will give up my seat for someone obviously in need of it through mobility issues. I certainly don't do something to women just because they are women, i would give up a seat for a man or woman its entirely based on their need. If you are a healthy woman and insist on my seat, you can go fuck yourself, likewise if you are a dude.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:21 PM
1

Why bother, last time the dipshits here didn't believe it, I'm not wasting my time again.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:13 PM
3

Seems about right, but if you are are genuinely sick your partner should look after your needs, its pretty shitty to make someone do chores when they are ill. But if you are one of these people who is always ill and any slight sniffle and you think its a major issue, he might have a point. Basically in my view to be completely fair, if its genuinely 50:50 if someone works 8 hours a day in an office you should be doing the equivalent work at home. School is a personal benefit not a relationship b…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:12 PM
2

Cant link am on ipad google lisa nowark
/r/MensRights22/08/14 12:54 PM
-3

They are everywhere, go to any bar or any section of society not populated by socially awkward inexperienced morons and you can say what you like without feminists saying anything. The real world doesn't actually respect or listen to feminists they are a toxic comedic band of ugly bitter women. The only people who give them prominence are pathetic weak nerdy losers who are trying to squirm their way into bed by trying to promote themselves as "progressive". In the real world people don't actuall…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:42 AM
4

They were going to throw him under a bus for their "targets" i hope he sues them for every penny he can.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:42 PM
4

So presumably an undercover cop or any cop cant even be in possession of drugs he is seizing as evidence since " the law is the law". Undercover cops should be able to take drugs and do whatever else is necessary without actually making a victim for the purposes of a case. Its just fucking common sense.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:17 PM
20

Lol beautiful, i hope those 9 years completely ruin her life and really hurt , stupid bitch.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:12 PM
1

Excellently spotted and well highlighted.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:08 PM
1

oh yes, bang on, not only that they also hypocritically do exactly what was done to them. just take Reddit for example: Post 1)"I was bullied for being a nerd and looking weird at school, those guys were such dicks I hope they die a horrid death" Post 2) "look at the fat woman i took a picture of in walmart, lets all laugh at her and mock her together, lol look how gross and disgusting she is" I was in a unique position in life because I was surrounded by nerds (i did physics at university and w…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:31 AM
1

People identified with the inbetweeners thats why it was so popular (its basically what being in a uk comprehensive is like), this looks shit, and unless the heartlessness of the women is part of the joke and obviously exaggerated etc , it looks utter shit.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:15 PM
-1

This is the absolute dumbest business idea in the entire world. The more exclusion rules you have for individuals the more it hits into profitability. If a floor is " women only " it will remain under capacity compared to mix sex. There is no advantage and loads of disadvantage. Dumbest idea ever.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:01 PM
2

Lets not forget the ASTRONAUT who wore an adult nappy to drive and kill her love rival. Women aren't immune to being scary creepy lust/love motivated weirdoes
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:58 PM
1

Physical bruises and a witness to the event, she should be banged to rights.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 02:52 PM
1

You know why you don't see any things saying "this is how men work" showing men kicking arse etc. Because the world knows full well that men are the primary driving force behind almost all of innovation/conflict/business. etc. We dont need some grandma email telling us "we are strong independent men"
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:49 PM
3

As a point of principle this is absolutely total and utter shit. If someone doesn't treat you as you wish you leave them you don't have a "right" to edit their behaviour to be as you want by threat of jail. I am disgusted with the UK and its total inability to comprehend that how you relate to other people in your private life outside of criminal or violent acts/behaviour is completely your freedom and choice, as is their freedom to leave. This ( conceptually) is not far removed from punishing s…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:45 PM
34

Ill save you a lot of time son and give you a very useful piece of life advice: In any hobby or interest that is populated by socially awkward and isolated individuals with low social status, they will pander and give significance to SJW purely to either use as a platform to give themselves significance over others or to win affections of the SJW, SJW and SJWP (social justice warrior panderer) basically form a mutual alliance where both give each other attention/affection/prominence to raise eac…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:27 PM
2

Well if ever you need a car just take a police car because " you need it more"
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:09 PM
7

Who else is looking forward to the next thunderf00t video?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 12:05 PM
1

Simply learning to do a simple 12 punch and hooks well will put you above 90% of most people similarly framed (height weight) as you. Hardly anyone punches properly and when you know how (and guard) you are pretty lethal, just remember it takes years to be very very good, but just 6 months going 3 times a week will make you pretty decent enough for self defense
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:15 PM
1

Heavy bag work, failing that shadow boxing. Ideally take some lessons, i cant teach you how to punch over the internet, but the quickest way to improve in your position s try and shadow box as hard and as fast as you can for 10 seconds then 10 seconds rest then 20 seconds then 20 seconds rest then 30 seconds then 30 seconds rest etc. do this again and again to get used to striking. You really need to practise hitting something though. But you'll be amazed how quickly you will tire when striking.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:57 PM
1

Lifting muscle is nothing, striking muscle is technique based.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:47 PM
-1

Dear god your wheels of delusion continue to rotate . It doesn't matter if you pay rent or not, how can you be so stupid to not understand that by virtue of you claiming you cant "just leave" means you acknowledge you NEED HER/THEM. Let me explain very simply because you are clearly not very intelligent. If i am paying rent with someone i don't want to be with , i go and find a new place to pay rent and then just leave, it really is that simple. Your problem is you probably pay a pittance on ren…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:45 PM
2

Provided you don't hit her when she is on the ground, a few well delivered strikes is perfectly fine, and actually incredibly damaging if you can punch well. If you really do fear for your safety get a tougher stronger friend to help, if i knew you, and you were in danger id come and help. All bullies should be neutralised regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:27 PM
3

Punch her in the face then and punch her hard, Get a knowledgable friend to teach you a basic straight (punch) and hook . (also if you have time elbow strikes) A well delivered strike to the face will break the nose or if you are good even knock them out. When women get hit they go into shock quite easily (source boxing instructor who has hit hundreds of women in the ring/class)
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:22 PM
-1

Lol, so where do we begin, the fact you think we should feel sorry for you because you are leaching off your girlfriend and don't like the way she treats you and you think you are the victim? My god the delusion is strong with you, lets reverse the genders shall we, imagine a woman on here complaining her boyfriend treats her like shit and makes her feel bad but she has to stay with him because he provides for her and she needs his financial support. You think everyone would be up in arms callin…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:15 PM
1

The whole games are sexists is total and utter shite anyway. no business would ever intentionally shut out a market especially a market which could effectively double the sales overnight if a few cosmetic changes occurred. The reality is games appeal to different demographics and complaining that specific fps aren't more female friendly is like complaining candy crush isn't more male friendly. Its basically bullshit from self entitled whiners who think the world should pander to their own unique…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:54 PM
1

Not when he is posting pictures saying " poor me"
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:36 PM
-1

Perhaps if you weren't such a massive unlikeable tit, you would have friends you could stay with. Poor didums your girlfriend is mean to you awwwww, grow a pair of testicles and tell her to go fuck herself instead of annoymous internet strangers who tell you the truth instead of pandering to your "poor princess routine" I hate people like you, no balls no spine and complain and whine about "my struggle" because you are too gutless to leave and standup for yourself.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:34 PM
2

Couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:29 PM
-1

I'm with you, if people give their consent to be in that situation i have absolutely zero sympathy too. If she was threatening to kill him and he was under fear of his life absolutely i have sincere sympathy for him, but whining because you don't have the balls to make a change because you don't want to lose x or y is pathetic. If you have a working pair of balls and a spine, you tell her to pack her shit up and get the fuck out of your house, she tries to hit you, you film it, and you retaliate…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:28 PM
0

Change " humans" to "blacks" repost it under authors name. She deserves the following backlash.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:20 PM
-1

You are a not a 16 year old man, you are a teenager not a man.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:15 PM
1

By debating or even explaining to feminists you are giving them undue credibility. I wouldn't waste my time debating someone who believed in blood drinking lizards running the world, likewise with feminist extremists. Also by actively challenging or arguing you allow them to further refine their crazy bullshit to be more palatable to 3rd parties. Additionally nothing pisses off feminists more than being ignored.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:09 PM
1

Thats the true beauty of why batshit crazy feminists are their own undoing. If you use logic and objective reason in order to follow or approve principles you can expect the same "in house" but if you instead use: drama, feels, anger, and victim claiming you can expect the same "in house" Thats why feminists will never be a force, they don't have a universal yardstick of logic to measure everything, they instead think their personal perspective outweighs everything.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:00 PM
2

Default gender is a completely meaningless term. Reproduction rates of one sex automatically influence the other, its got absolutely nothing to do with which is better or more "pure". Reproduction of Males are just as vital as females evolutionary speaking.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:50 PM
9

Who cares, they can moan and complain all they like, they are the ones who are left on the shelf at the end of the day. You don't need feminist permission or approval to do anything, they are a joke. If you find someone you like and they like you (genuinely) who give a shit what some demented self entitled hag thinks.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 12:44 PM
-5

There are cases of people being raped and killed on their front doorstep by a stranger, doesn't mean if someone refused to leave their house because they thought it would definitely happen to them they aren't being hysterical. I like how you keep enquiring about how you think I'm trying to be macho, im sure its a difficult concept to understand that a) i dont give 2 shits what you or reddit thinks of me and b) by thinking that what i write is trying to be macho (its normal fyi ) shows that you p…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:51 AM
-2

perhaps you have autism and don't exactly understand what tone conveys or means. allow me to explain, by expressing disgust and outrage it informs OP that his view and behaviour is not an innocent insignificant blunder but instead a extreme and massively incorrect POV that illustrates stupidity presumably if someone writes a post saying "mens rights is being held back by blood drinking lizard people" you think a calm rational explanation and detailing why in the same tone and manner as a printer…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:35 AM
-6

absolute nonsense, its quality control, if OP is being a chump and being mind numbingly stupid he needs to know, i genuinely am disgusted by what he thinks/does. stop your "im so oppressed you must pander to my concerns with special gloves" nonsense. I can play the same angle and say if MRA is such a unique space (it isnt) then we shouldn't waste it on chumps peddling their inane over hysterical bullshit, and instead address the real issues. You are basically defending some whiner moaning about …
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:21 AM
-8

Are you blind, can you actually read? OP is not some guy who has been locked in a cupboard all his life and just released today. he was specifically deemed suitable to hold a teaching post to younger people, so he cant be a shy special snowflake incapable of getting feedback. i completely disagree with you that its up to us to pander to the overly sensitivity, perhaps you and your friends pander to that mentality, but the issue is that he is overly sensative and hysterical as the cause of his pr…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:17 AM
-9

You're a retard for claiming sexism and using it as an excuse and others who think like me, and don't pander to this "oh my god you must treat me like a delicate sunflower" mentality. what i said i stand by, if i was trying to be offensive i would be much more offensive, i genuinely think this guy is a chump and has some kind of mental issues, i also dont patronise by skirting round the issue and treating him like a princess. i can cope being called an arsehole or cunt or whatever (im a big boy …
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:04 AM
-9

oh dear god you make me laugh, if you are so weak and pathetic you cant open up TO YOUR FIANCÉE about being offered a job because of fear of being labelled a paedophile. then yes you don't live in the real world and in every-way conceivable you are a chump. its not societies responsibility to pander to your unique and over-sensitive hysterical prejudices.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:00 AM
-8

well its aimed at OP, in the justification of not sugar coating things. if you want to form a special sunshine club where you and fellow princesses dont every have to deal with anything real or of a tone that is direct then go ahead. there is no value or purpose in pandering to peoples ego, if you want to call me an ass or a jerk or even a cunt feel free, provided you can objectively reason why and state that reason. if my post was "you are a dick" and that was it, you would have a point, but it…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:52 AM
-9

lol oh the fucking irony.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:48 AM
1

you also left out the fact by refusing the job, he is feeding into the "all coaches must be paedophiles" mentality that he is complaining about (which doest exist)
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:41 AM
-9

There is when you need a wake up call. you are being as hysterical as you can be. pandering to your own hysterical unvalidated prejudices. im not going to sugar coat anything, because you need to know as direct as possible, because you dont seem able to understand things. its right you should know how poorly i view you based on what you have said, because you are a massive hypocrite. you are basically saying "isn't it awful that everyone thinks girl teachers are paedophiles" followed by "i bette…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:39 AM
-8

I didn't even have the guts to tell my fianceé about the offer because I was too afraid that she might think so too and that would have broken my heart. this line summarises perfectly what a complete and utter chump you are, if you think your own fiancée thinks by simply being offered a job teaching girls you must therefore be a sexual deviant then you and your relationship are worth less than my relationship with my neighbours. I would be disgusted if my neighbours thought that, let alone my FI…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:34 AM
-11

you are a pathetic excuse for a man, you are complaining about your own unvalidated prejudices. Thats like claiming how appalling it is being a woman becuase you cant leave your front door becuase of "rape culture" and everyone and anyone male will be looking at you with rape eyes wanting to rape you at all times. (you are a victim of your own hysterical bat shit mind and victim complex) if you want the job take the job, stop being such a loser and whining about how you imagine people you dont e…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:28 AM
2

Just FYI if she ever breaches the court order and tries to hit you or strike you in any manner, you have every right and wont get into trouble by knocking her out or hurting her significantly. As any court will recognise her actions imply serious intent on harming you. and you are pretty much in a cast iron position
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:12 AM
1

this is why when people say women outnumber men in college/university it is generally meaningless. studying shit like this actually makes you less employable because it tars you with you a badge of "angry activist" and generally doesnt give you any value at all. learning on the job IT skills for 4 years will be much better off than some chump studying this shite. isn't it such a coincidence that "women outnumber men" in college at the same time colleges offer more and more useless "soft subjects…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:34 PM
1

The entire representation case is utter nonsense anyway and be debunked using elementary grade maths. With equal total numbers, if you have a surplus in one area you have an undersupply in another. It ain't rocket science
/r/MensRights09/08/14 02:14 PM
4

no, not the actual act of abortion, a forced abortion or forced pregnancy to the "host" is abysmal. however.....there should be a process that confirms and solidified parental rights and responsibility at the point of late pregnancy. i.e every couple who is x months pregnant and within the window of humane abortion has to sign and declare the parental responsibility of both parties (subject to genuine paternal validation). failure to get the signature/legal agreement waives the right to sue or c…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:21 AM
0

by that logic you better not call her "cupcake" else she will grow up to be high in fat/sugar and especially transfats which are terrible
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:23 AM
7

"Cant you see you were exploited, you poor girl, you think you were consenting and able to make a decision but those evil men were just using you and your stupidity for their own selfish ends.........................................now tell everyone about it and allow me to exploit your 'trauma' for the purposes of getting ratings for my show and raise my profile" and that's ignoring the entire point that the accusation/framing of rape is complete bullshit. but what do you expect from daytime tv…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:19 AM
1

I look at them as if they just pissed in my drink, and walk away making a mental note never to speak or approach them again. no point entertaining crazy in your life.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 08:45 AM
1

yes they are
/r/MensRights06/08/14 03:07 AM
-1

FFS this has to be my last one to you before bed, im knackered. again we see you claiming what your opinion is is objective truth yet what i think is meaningless opinion. the hypocricy is absolutely staggering, rarely do i see it so badly, and just for the record it wouldnt matter if every redditor was in unison with everything you say IT IS AN OPINION it has no logical basis and had no value beyond "i specifically do not like x" you have been really exposed and undermined about your claims of "…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 03:07 AM
0

perhaps you should take a basic statistics course or learn what probability is. im done teaching you for free.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:57 AM
1

Just so we are clear then, if everything i have said is absolutely 100% true do you accept the fact you are a complete and utter cretin incapable of distinguishing reality from fantasy and has massive insecurities that have jaded his judgement and made him a total twat. and if i am lying i am some sad pathetic loser who makes up stories for social approval or whatever (you can write what you like here) do you accept those conditions, if i am right (telling the truth) you are a complete moronic j…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:56 AM
-2

The rest of your post is meaningless drivel. like your opinion you mean, look i cant make this any clearer your judgement and opinion has no value or weighting or insight. me calling you an idiot (and you are an idiot) has the same constructive worth as you calling me rude, its not objectively verified, ITTTSSS ANNNNNNN OOOOOOPPPPPIIIIINNNNNIIIIIOOOOOONNNNNN you know that thing you love so much, you see when i state my opinion you claim it is an insult and can be dismissed etc but then in the ne…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:48 AM
-2

yeah what was i thinking, in a thread about an article specifically only detailing a man's experience and feelings of intervening in a domestic violence case against women, and asking questions to the readers and then the comments (which have been specifically mentioned to be note worthy) detail other people posting their stories and experiences. in my insanity i though posting my experience and answers to the question would be a constructive contribution, how fucking ludicrous of me. i should h…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:25 AM
2

i think it would be used as an excuse for feminists to get attention again and invade the media and hijack social media. have you ever seen a campaign to demand we find fat blokes as beautiful? nor have I.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:16 AM
-2

I do not care if you like/dislike other peoples opinions yet seems to think your "opinion" should be valued and listened to as important. this is why you are challenged
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:08 AM
-2

so at this point do i really have to point out your opinion is just that an opinion, who cares its meaningless. you can think whatever you like im rude aggressive whatever, so what, its your opinion ONLY YOUR OPINION> my opinion is you are complete cretin incapable of rational thought and easily confused. look everyone we are swapping opinions, such a valuable thing lol what is the best ice cream mine in my opinion its chocolate, wow such insight hurry respond asap im dying to know your individu…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 02:06 AM
-2

Got any proof? Police reports? Days, times, dates, CCTV footage Yes i actually have all of those well i dont have access to teh police report that with the police i have a letter thanking me for my involvement (statement) from the police and informing me of the sentence of the guy i also have cctv footage (they gave it to me) but you again seem to be under some terrible delusion that your approval or acceptance is important to me. i as stated dont give two shits what someone like you thinks, you…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:59 AM
-4

MY POINT: You are rude, aggressive, place yourself above others, do not take other peoples opinions into account, and you appear to be here just to cause arguments and insult people not add anything constructive. MY POINT: your personal preference of style has absolutely no value to me or anyone else with a working brain why dont you tell me what your favourite foods are or what flowers you like best, it has about as much value, why should what you personally find pleasing be of interest to anyo…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:53 AM
1

It not illegal where I live. Should we still consider everyone where I live as weaker than everyone where you live? Whats the deciding factor? so you can carry a knife to defend yourself with and that changes everything, the threat increases but your threat increases. also where "you live" is completely and utterly irrelevant to my statement I hate bullies and abusers no matter who they are, and would do exactly the same every time Yet another example of that same fallacy? I mean to say that som…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:42 AM
-1

perhaps i can spell it out a bit more simpler for you, because you seem to be struggling here is a gem from you You literally just proved my point. You ignored everything I actually said and then resorted to insulting me and argued against...a point I didn't make? after quoting you directly writing this You are unwilling to even entertain other peoples opinions or comments but rather lash out and throw insults because someone thinks differently. and addressing specifically "why i am unwilling to…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:34 AM
-3

well perhaps if you could read properly, you would see how your "point" is exposed for the nonsense it is and far from "proving it" it actually explains why it isnt a pointy at all. but why let reality ruin your parade eh, reality is clearly no friend of yours.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:15 AM
-2

Cant be bothered to address all your individual retorts so ill concentrate on your most telling one. Your manliness is much amazing. Im sure that so much man in one package is what the vast majority of people took issue with. You are a gift to white knight needing women everywhere! this summarises your pathetic stance perfectly, when i told my fellow boxers it was a normal story another boxer saved a girl being raped (years ago) he kneed him and he was sick all over his shirt (was brand new shir…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 01:12 AM
1

its a game of statistics where i live its illegal to carry any form of knife (effectively) so most people do not have a knife. likewise most people don't have a bucket of acid, if someone used a bucket of acid in one attack this doesnt mean future attacks with other people will have a bucket of acid. its a bout probability and likelihood, most people dont have knives or guns or anything else were i live
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:59 AM
-1

You are unwilling to even entertain other peoples opinions or comments but rather lash out and throw insults because someone thinks differently. lol this just highlights your appalling mind, you think i should consider other peoples opinions or comments telling me that an event that occurred to me didn't happen. good one, if your "opinion" or "comment" can be automatically validated (ill remind you i know that my tale is completely true), why the fuck would i give two shits what you think? this …
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:55 AM
-5

oh dear god, you see i genuinely don't care if you believe me, why should I what value does it have for me? but i like how incredibly unintelligent you are, im sure the thought has never occurred to you that for someone to intervene in an incident which is behind a closed door, that you would need some kind of indication that it was an event of domestic violence and not sex or role play or just an argument, hence standing out the door listening to him shout at her about the tv remote allowed me …
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:47 AM
-5

you look like you just want to take the opportunity to brag. I know that isn't the case, but that's how it reads. If we were talking about trains or holidays or food then yes, i agree as its oddly random and would appear as a brag, but as explained in the context of "would you or could you help a woman suffering from domestic violence" their inability to understand context or relevancy is their problem. i am not putting in effort to satisfy the insecurities of people who get riled up because som…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:33 AM
-2

No not at all, because "the same every time" means under the same conditions/circumstances. i don't literally mean in every circumstance i will be involved, i.e if someone has a gun and points it at a woman (or mans) head I'm not jumping in, likewise if a gang of 30 knife wielding nutters are cutting up a woman i wouldn't get involved either (they would easily kill me) i didnt really think that needed pointing out. likewise i dont think i need to really point out the "stabbed" case you are refer…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:22 AM
-7

well i think its a fundamental core value of a good and intelligent mind to understand that "delivery" does not influence reality. because someone doesn't like how something is phrased or its tone, has no bearing on whether its true or not. seems mensrights is less concerned with objective truth and more concerned with having a support group to tell each other how great they are and how all women are evil harpies who deserve bad things to happen to them at all times. in short if for you to accep…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:12 AM
-3

you realise dipshit out of the two of us i am the one who actually knows the full reality, so if everything i have claimed is true then your comment and your inability to believe it is a testament to either your stupidity or inadequacy. you can believe whatever the fuck you like it doesn't change reality, i know what happened and i know the fact you "cant believe it" is a reflection of just how weak or pathetic you must be or how uninteresting your life is. like a fat fuck not believing someone …
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:55 PM
-6

Fantastic i was hoping you would post something along those lines. (thanks for posting) let be very clear this isn't directed at you personally/specifically (at all) but allow my retort to address the neigh sayers and these issues to show just how much of a cesspit this subreddit has become. it takes a special brand of absolute moron to think a story of intervening in a domestic violence case and rescuing a woman from an aggressive violent man is somehow "bragging" in a thread specifically about…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:48 PM
-4

Yeah in a planet of 7 billion people such events would literally be impossible from ever happening. I imagine anything involving leaving mothers basement is inconceivable to you.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 10:07 PM
-2

I absolutely would, i have hit (and kicked) many girls in the boxing ring, i have no hesitation in hitting a violent women on the street. provided my arse is as covered as it was in this case (witnesses cctv etc), and my action can be as justified. if the case was exactly the same but genders reversed i would do exactly the same and intervene exactly the same way.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:24 PM
-5

care to explain?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:18 PM
0

yes searching women, women support or community support in delicate situations such as female rape specialists or treating individuals who only respond or open up to women (community policing)
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:05 PM
-9

did you really fail to comprehend a sentence?, haha oh wow. here's a clue because i suspect you are thick as shit, if i wrote "its exactly the same as saying...." then you would have a point, but you dont because you are simply too dense to understand how treating one incident and extrapolating out to all other incidences as "this will be the same in all cases " is an example of highlight the fallacy. i.e you are an idiot "baseballs are round", "the moon is round"---"did you just equate baseball…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:00 PM
1

its academic anyway, what decent normal man would ever want to be with a self declared feminist. 99.9% of people that use that title really just mean "angry self entitled moron" its a toxic label if some men are stupid enough to swallow the bullshit in that article and think "I should follow this because then women will find me attractive" they deserve to be lonely. a manly man does his own thing and satisfies his own rational and objective fair view of things, he doesn't wait for someone else t…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:40 PM
-5

because from his own mouth he was strangling and chocking her because "she had dropped/lost the remote control to the TV" and im not an idiot
/r/MensRights05/08/14 08:31 PM
-18

Yeah he is stoneless because he thinks one unconnected event is related to all events. oh the irony of calling me an idiot e.g "i was mugged by a black person, now i avoid all black people does that mean i am stoneless?" (yes, and racist)
/r/MensRights05/08/14 07:48 PM
0

law enforcement especially covert or surveillance based work it can be fully justified, but things like fire-fighter etc where the gender has no impact on the post/role/duty, its a disgrace having different entry standards. do you understand what these words means, try reading them again.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:58 PM
-28

I have long suspected that people so keen to be seen as "progressive" and "Modern" actually lack the stones to do anything about anything when it really matters and its do or die. I actually was unfortunate enough to witness (heard to begin with) first hand a horrible case of domestic violence in a hotel room, i intervened without even thinking about it, and rescued her and "neutralised him" (she was totally innocent he was a shit). he was arrested, hotel and police thanked me blah blah blah. bu…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:40 PM
3

If you ever want to see a woman genuinely care about a man's life, step 1) get a girlfriend step 2) buy a motorbike you will be reminded every 5 minutes or so, how she doesn't want you to die
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:42 PM
4

would you stop whining: " waa, waa men die significantly younger than women, boo hoo they die via suicide at an overwhelming majority, waa waa, they die far more from industry too " its pathetic, the real gender injustice issue here is how women in college feel uncomfortable when a man they don't find attractive looks in their direction.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:39 PM
1

yeah they sure showed and humiliated me likening relationship differences of men and women to two technologies invented and developed by men. gee is my face red
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:35 PM
2

Abso-fucking-lutely, but obviously they restrict themselves to tier 2 positions if they do so.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:30 PM
5

its funny seeing women complain about misogyny on the internet, because before the net people would generally associate or hear from people you shared some connection with in real life, and being women they would naturally be exposed to a tailored and censored version of peoples real views and thoughts in order to maybe appease or even possibly date them. on the internet nobody cares because woman on the internet are not required to be pandered too, and they see reality for what it is. and its g…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:15 PM
-6

you are a complete idiot, and i have tagged you as such.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:09 PM
9

What these dopey morons don't understand is that thinking "only women can be objectified" is almost an admission that womens only purpose or value is beauty. if you think women objectifying men cant exist you are essentially saying women cant see men as just valueless aesthetic objects, and actually claiming you accept men are always more than that. as always "the truth hurts" women are so sensitive about being "objectified" because actually in the truth or truths they know that their society wi…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 04:07 PM
2

Absolutely, there should be a tiered entry if female membership is needed but unavailable under equal test requirements. i.e you can apply for either test at anytime and depending which test you do, places you in specific roles. i.e tier 1 and tier 2, (tier 1 can do 1+2 roles, tier 2 can only do tier 2 roles) completely fair and valid, equal hoops for equal roles.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:59 PM
-3

i cant be bothered to walk you through how statistics or numbers work, if you are too dense to understand how gender roles within the fire department and intelligence/law enforcement are different by virtue of the work then there is no point. likewise if you are too dense to "work with hypotheticals" and think based on a sample size of your aunt that you have a point, you are literally not worth bothering with. consider our conversation closed, but if anyone else wishes to reply who understands …
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:56 PM
-2

No you dont understand, if you have a case where you need a female undercover asset and you dont have any because the test doesn't qualify enough women to join, society isnt safer. women are 50% the population, if a gender specific crime or role needs an asset of a certain gender and you dont have it, society is not safer. your firefighter example is irrelevant as i pointed out. fires are gender neutral so you can have an all male firefighting team as i pointed out. but you try infiltrating a fe…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:26 PM
4

women and aggression is a bit like the internet and aggression. People say and act in a manner they would not normally do when they are in a real position of danger or facing a legitimate threat. as a man growing up we quickly learn about violence and threats and who to respect and avoid etc to avoid getting your arse kicked. i.e you wouldnt as a scrawny 5'4" man walk up to a 6'10" muscle bound freak and tell him "hes an idiot" because you over heard him talking crap, but you could on the intern…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:22 PM
-1

law enforcement especially covert or surveillance based work it can be fully justified, but things like fire-fighter etc where the gender has no impact on the post/role/duty, its a disgrace having different entry standards. you must surely accept that you must have police women and female agents/assets in law and military intelligence etc. but certainly there is no issue with having an all male firefighting team
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:11 PM
-1

to bloody right he won, its a disgrace. however there is a genuine case one can make that if there was a significant shortage of women in the FBI, and a legitimate security need for women. then you can rationally defend a difference in standards, but this also applies to a difference in roles once the position is obtained, i.e if women are required to a different standard then they can also be expected to do different duties. law enforcement and specifically the FBI is a unique field where you a…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:08 PM
37

its absolutely well deserved for them to have multiple nights of unrest and to eventually lose their careers. they have failed these students by failing to uphold and support their basic human rights of due process. In their eyes they were perfectly happy to burden this poor student with a crippling unjust decision because it fit in with their "business decision" so its only right that this student completely destroys their business model by exposing their shameful and appalling processes to due…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:59 PM
162

I hope he takes them to the cleaners, its absolutely disgusting how they think they can throw someone under the bus just to maintain some arbitrary target. I sincerely hope he wins and wins big, so to send a message to other spineless chumps thinking they can ignore peoples human rights and due process.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:47 AM
2

this reminds me when feminists edited a "lads mag" cover to be more "real". it had dating advice, and the advice was "learn up on women's rights issues, women are really impressed by a guy who knows their struggle etc" I would genuinely love to see these women try that on other women, i.e tell guys what to say exactly through a ear piece as a tv experiment and see them crash and burn
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:44 AM
3

i think we both know she has no boyfriend mate
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:41 AM
2

This is actually a fantastic list I recommend everyone read and learn from it. its basically a check list for "how much of a loser are you". ideally any sane normal person whould score 0/35 the higher your score the greater a loser you are and if you get 35/35 you will hated by both men and women. i especially love the "you should inject feminism into your daily conversation with guys", yeah that is a top tip, if you find your problem is you have too many friends and would rather be left alone b…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:39 AM
17

I think its a great idea, and to pay for it you can tax women only, otherwise you can fuck off.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:34 AM
3

If they don't want your money fine, go somewhere where they do. any rule that removes 50% of your market is absolutely fucking stupid business. excluding minorities is different as they are by definition a minority and so unfairly can get screwed (so we should rightly challenge and stop those who unfairly deny minorities). but men are 50% of the market so vote with your wallet (shouldn't be legal anyhow though, discrimination is discrimination)
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:15 AM
3

This is absolutely fucking vile, what sort of shitty news considers this content. I shit you not that this "story" would be considered unsuitable for jerry springer due to the ages , but the content is absolutely appropriate. this is not news this is just shitty gossip, what is next are we going to see lie detectors and "you are not the father" read out live on the news. the channel really is a new low
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:09 AM
7

basically the underlying claim is. (My right to wear what I want) > (your right to look or talk as you want) which doesn't take a genius to see how bullshit it is. I will look in any direction i feel like, and not apologise for it.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 10:44 AM
6

article is appallingly written no accuracy at all for example they cite clare's law as " a scheme which allows women to check police records to see if a partner has a violent past" it is not a law for women, anyone can do it regardless of sex, a man can enquire about a woman or other man.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 10:33 AM
-5

Then they aren't victims, your pandering to people as victims for THEIR choices. Is like feeling sympathy for a woman who is only with a guy for his money and complaining that he is rude to her. And when you say " why don't you leave?" she responds " because he is rich, and i like living the lifestyle" do you have sympathy for her do you? Or instead think rightly think she has made a choice and her "package deal" is her responsibility by accepting it, she accepts money because she wants it, but …
/r/MensRights03/08/14 10:36 AM
1

I felt sorry for the kid, its no surprise he doesn't have a father, little mite probably doesn't stand a chance.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 10:14 AM
1

I remember there was an episode where they had a disagreement and she was proven/shown to be wrong, and then she had a go at him for making her feel stupid because she was wrong etc. I wouldn't tolerate that crap in reality for a minute, she wold be dumped in no time.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 10:07 AM
1

Is " male tears" on a mug just a cheaper easier way than fully writing " i am an angry lesbian" on it.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 09:36 AM
2

I had the unique position of being pursued by a woman from my boxing class, we went on a few dates and she really liked me, however one day in the class she hit me because i made a funny joke about someone else ( cant remember what it was at all) and she full on punched me as hard as she could on my arm, (this was post class so we had no gloves or wraps on). What shocked me was how quickly it was, no hesitation no follow through just instant (ironically actually faster than her sparring ),there …
/r/MensRights03/08/14 09:18 AM
-2

If it was me and i was in your shoes, i would hand her the knife personally while looking at her dead in the eyes so she knows I'm serious. Then say enjoy and walk out with a skip and a jump in my step never to be bothered again. Adjust testicles and get on with my life. Sympathy = 0 , for people like that. Don't allow yourself to be pushed around by anyone, you are your own man
/r/MensRights03/08/14 09:05 AM
1

I have seen that a few times and every time i end up asking myself " just what the hell is that guy getting out of that relationship". She literally brings nothing to the table just a bag of grumpy angry self entitled bitter moans and expectations, in reality anyone would just dump her immediately.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 08:56 AM
-3

You are all going to hate me, but if your girlfriend is a bitch and hits you or abuses you in anyway, then you leave its very simple If she is a monster and you accept and tolerate it , you are partly involved in the situation. Regardless of gender provided leaving is a possibility and you are not scared for your life or children's lives if you do leave or attempt to leave, you cant be with someone knowing they are a cunt and then complain about it. Hitting people is absolutely unacceptable in a…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 08:52 AM
-12

I am genuinely embarrassed for you
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:21 PM
-9

you are being so hysterical you can't interpret this properly, a man can be a biological father but have no legal representation or "evidence" of that fact (to authorities) but the same isnt true of women because they physically give birth to the child so are captured by the system. there is no discrimination whatsoever, a woman who is dating a father or in a long term cohabiting (but not legally recognised as such) relationship looking after his children has no power or right to the child. this…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 07:41 PM
1

there is nothing mens right about this, not only can you not use extremist terrorists as "data points" of society wide trends. the fact she was jailed for such behaviour is a reflection of the justice system correctly not tolerating this crap. your post is no different from claiming "men think women should be killed" by citing a convicted serial killer who killed women and was arrested and imprisoned for it. it shows nothing more than the deluded nonsense one extremist did/believes
/r/MensRights02/08/14 05:45 PM
1

of course they should be free to continue, but it still says something about their character (as it does with whores). I dont sell my friendship for money, i only befriend people i genuinely like, as a result my friendship is not a commodity or trade able asset to be purchased it is beyond price these women are vile people, if you can be bought like a product you can expect to be treated as one and loved as one, (i.e traded for an upgrade, dropped with no warning etc) these dopey women dont real…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 05:15 PM
3

no it isn't rape in my books, its sexual assault if you clearly specified "No" and "stop" and she continued. technically its illegal although lack of proof and teh context means that in practice it means nothing. i would avoid her like the plague and make it clear that shit doesnt fly with you, if she tries it again start filiming film it, if she continues punch her hard. dont take that shit,
/r/MensRights02/08/14 05:09 PM
3

absolutely not in fact this is a fundamental principle of the justice system and is a well known logical fallacy that people sometimes try and bring into a court room (in some form) and get rightly torn to shreds. the presence or frequency of a crime or event by others has absolutely no bearing on your case wrt to innocence of guilt of you in anyway. the same way you cant say the defendant is black and most of the prison population is black therefore he is more likely to be guilty. its total and…
/r/MensRights02/08/14 05:03 PM
6

Its a service twitter provides to help you identify who to avoid in your life. its childish inane shite from girls who are insecure because they dont like the reality that all of history science and the modern world was built by male hands and male brains, and so need to try and "bash them" to make themselves feel better. the equivalent would be to have a twitter of "girls are icky", it would appeal to similar demographics but male instead
/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:53 PM
1

Oh the fucking irony of the author "pretending to be stupid" to try and prove her point, when she is actually incredibly stupid I especially like the "i don't need feminism when the sports star is raping me " as if without feminism rape would no longer be a crime. Fucking moronic in about every level.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 04:21 PM
1

iIf this is a problem for you people looking at you or giving you compliments then wear a burka problem solved. if you claim " i Should be able to wear what i want this is a free society" well exactly the same principle applies to where people can look and freedom of speech, its a free society. fucking morons, sexual assault is a crime, looking and complimenting someone isn't. These ugly pigs can be ignored no problem
/r/MensRights02/08/14 11:25 AM
1

they dont have sex though, they expected to be treated like princesses just because they are pretty.no sex
/r/MensRights02/08/14 09:38 AM
2

but might as well get some arm candy that actually has sex with you
/r/MensRights02/08/14 09:37 AM
1

but their rich idiots so they must be doing something right
/r/MensRights01/08/14 07:06 PM
0

she is too busy making coffee for the CEO of airlink, Rodger Foster. lol
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:20 PM
1

if i ever find myself in that position (unlikely) i will simply repeat verbatim one of the excuses she has provided with me on another occasion (unless its i'm on my period of course). Its handy to do this with communication also btw. if you are dating or seeing someone and they do something really unreasonable or rude via text message or email, save it and much later (weeks/months) use the exact same communication in one of your conversations, and see how she receives it. you have to be intelli…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 02:05 PM
1

if you are too stupid to see that blaming me for a being responsible for unsympathetic support for domestic violence victims, based on my value judgements on a case that wasn't anything to do with domestic violence. (show me where he claimed she beat or hit him) then thats your problem. it doesn't surprise me you are also too stupid to see the similarity of supporting someone just because they feel/think they a victim and false rape accusations (which also are not to do with the case either). bo…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:53 PM
2

i saw that post and it was really rather stupid, if the roles were reversed i would easily say "guys you cant do this, not only is it illegal, its pretty fucking stupid, you cant put titillating photos of a stranger on their desk on their first day of work, what sort of morons are you?" she should of spoken up. the fact she didn't was weak. by any normal standards its completely unacceptable behaviour in a work environment
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:39 PM
2

i wonder what the pilot thinks, someone should ask him. (lol)
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:14 PM
0

utter nonsense, using your complete lack of logic i could accuse you, using the same fictitious unrelated reasoning "it is people like you that make it difficult of male victims of false allegations to be considered innocent"
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:10 PM
-2

Yeah imagine that a group of people who don't automatically pander to your professional victim routine just because your girlfriend was a twat. if those groups of people annoy you, you better stay out of any normal male activities or groups of typical men. "awwww my girlfriend said nasty things to me, poor me, i am so oppressed/sad" If you are a such a mentally deranged overlysensitive sunflower you align yourself with the feminist movement and specifically a crazy batshit deluded feminist, dont…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:47 PM
11

I love that taking a 17 year old to a party and letting her getting drunk is a crime in the US. happens all the time in the UK, its no issue at all (its also not illegal)
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:10 PM
1

its worth reading, woman is crazy, guy is a complete chump
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:51 AM
-1

the guy is a total spinless chump also, completely unable to stand up for himself. no self respecting person should let that shit fly, especially when the person has the nerve to think they are for equality
/r/MensRights01/08/14 11:50 AM
1

See the video i was referring to regarding his mangina status, you tube search " men on strike" and look for the fox interview. Then tell me he hasn't got a mangina
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:23 PM
14

Hilarious, ignoring the fact that "life coach " and leading authority on "complimentary treatments" are two of the biggest red flags of complete bullshit you can get, the idea is completely and utter based on ridiculous principles. Puppies do not and cannot generally educate themselves about what else is out there and leave to a better offer, people can and do and will. In the same way "treat your employees like puppies" is not a thing and business managers and management science would never mak…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 09:14 PM
3

Fucking pathetic. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2536628/Men-stay-DNA-analysis-reveals-Y-chromosome-not-dying-out.html
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:24 PM
2

Just an example of the "noise" , it wasn't refuting or disagreeing with you at all, just an addition.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:55 PM
2

I wouldn't listen to that moron, just look what he says when that author of " men on strike " is on fox to plug her book, its on youtube (cant link am on iPad) Guy is a total pathetic loser. Total mangina.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:51 PM
2

I don't understand this at all, can someone explain to me how woman can be out having hetrosexual intercourse, while men are just wanking at a flickering screen. In my stupidity i was under the impression that for every woman engaged in hetrosexual intercourse at least one man will equally be involved in it. But this is feminist logic so nothing surprises me. "ha ha men are all losers staying at home wanking, women are out having sex...." Think it through Einstein.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:45 PM
3

"What a shit comment you just posted i am going to kill you, you moron." There you have just had probably the same level threat as she has had. Time to claim your victimhood and gather sympathy to all. Luckily not being a hysterical moron, you will just ignore it and dismiss it as "typical internet noise" as any other person would. She is a a pathetic professional victim.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:38 PM
11

If these colleges were willing to throw these guys under the bus in order to protect their funding i have absolutely no sympathy when they get sued and made to pay big by these guys who have all launched law suits in retaliation. Good for them.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:34 PM
2

why didnt you leave her?
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:37 PM
1

I disagree, if you (they) think in "team scores" such as black versus white, and think somehow people should inherit or be responsible for events or behaviours that had nothing to do with you but you take responsibility because you are on the same "team" then you very much deserve ridicule and hostility as your thought processes are racist and bigoted. If you find the idea of me demanding an apology from my black neighbour because my auntie was killed by another completely different unknown blac…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 04:25 PM
1

If this in the UK park there anyway, any fine is illegal and cannot be enforced as it violates the EU directive.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 02:04 PM
1

Sounds like a good business plan, a restaurant where men wont be paying the bill, I'm sure they will do well lol .
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:53 PM
1

Nice to see someone in the know on this.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:51 PM
1

You are bang on correct. As of 2004 under a EU directive, unless its a private membership club like a gym or golf course etc its illegal discrimination.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:50 PM
1

Under your logic, womenagainstfeminism wouldn't exist.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:47 PM
1

Oh the irony of me not being bothered to listen to all her shite. Stopped the video after about a minute.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:43 PM
1

This is the most retarded campaign i have ever seen in my life. It ticks about every box for deluded nonsense there is no message here, no thought out well reasoned point, its just an advert that is basically " you better acknowledge my suffering as a woman" as if women only are victims of gun crime. Absolutely pathetic.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:18 PM
-1

Try not to be a sensitive precious little sunflower, its a joke.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:12 PM
0

Its only In the taboo zone for morons who cant think properly. What these bozos do, is they cant actually assess things on their merits or follow or understand principles so they just follow a routine of outrage at anything an everything that has a hot button word regardless of the context. With everything, context is key, if you cant understand context or how context is so vital your opinion or view of anything is completely meaningless.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:10 PM
0

What these morons don't understand is that by trying to magnify their "suffering" and manufacturing sympathy in a way that insults peoples intelligence ( i.e rebranding victim to survivor) they just show everyone they are Hysterical and their opinion or view on things don't matter. I bet they justify "survivor" by claiming calling someone a "victim" further makes victims feel powerless, i.e i refuse to call myself a victim etc. But its just the same shit if simple words and appropriate terminolo…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:04 PM
2

Lol perhaps if you weren't such a moron you'd afford an iPad and see for yourself how it works. You can think of me however you like, it doesn't change the fact your a retard and anyone and everyone can see based on your complete inability to understand the concept of context. Im so glad people like you never hold any power and instead just spend their lives working at mcdonalds because they are too stupid to actually do anything else. Good luck with that champ lol.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:05 AM
2

You will be waiting a long time, because if you think I'm going to waste my time walking through a retard who doesn't even understand basics such as what context or relativism is, you are even dumber than i thought ( and thats really saying something). You are a like some completely innumerate moron who cant understand maths asking for a mathematical proof of pythagorus, you are just too dumb, thats your problem, not mine.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:54 AM
0

Thats because the ipad which i am now using does it automatically you fucking moron.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:49 AM
0

Perhaps if you weren't such a fucking retard you would understand how language works dipshit. Provided you understand what is being communicated how its communicated is irrelevant You are are such a joyless pedant with no real achievements in life you think because you are sad enough to spend effort in bothering to formally use grammar you somehow have worth or it reflects well on you. It just shows you for the moron you are
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:36 AM
4

Your brain, such as it is, appears to be having a meltdown, probably due to too much meth. No, 4000 is not cool, it is merely less hot or cooer but not cool This and this alone is an absolute monument to your absolute stupidity. Rarely do you see someone expose themselves for being such a cretin . Its like you have absolutely no understanding what context or relative actually means, it also shows you know absolutely nothing about temperature either, but thats another issue entirely. Saying an as…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:31 AM
4

You really are stupid, mild is a relative term. If someone is explaining about temperature gradients of a star and refers to an area of 4000 degrees as "cool" do you scoff and call them an idiot because 4000 degrees is not "cool" Would you say "Would you sit in a bath of 4000 degree matter and call it cool?" This is how stupid your comment is to people who actually understand critical objective logical thinking, your "feels is feels" bullshit doesn't work here, go back to tumblr.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:46 AM
5

Jesus christ this is hilarious, these responses are from people with the intellectual calibre of a walnut. I feel bad for Dawkins, he is wasting his time throwing pearls to pigs.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:40 AM
4

But thats not what you get, you end up with people playing oppression and victim top trumps trying to tell the other side " we have it worse" Normal rational people only commit to equality regardless of gender, if someone is a genuine issue that effects only women it should still piss you off. Injustice is injustice, inequality is inequality,
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:25 AM
1

I saw a headline somewhere in some shitty tabloid that she was also gutted and angry because a deal to sell a dvd of the birth by poundland (lol) fell through ( this is not a joke). If she was hit by a car and killed the nations average iq would raise 5 points instantly
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:20 AM
9

The same is true of mens rights also btw, if you label yourself an MRA it has the same toxicology as "feminist" Most people (myself included) hate all injustice and inequality, i am as much pissed off as women being treated like sub human scum and raped by the police and authorities in places like rural india as i am boys being abused in care homes etc. The instant you reduce your activism/concern to only consider your own sex you lose the title of "being reasonable" to other people. Women's iss…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:02 AM
2

Couldn't agree more, this is utter bullshit, especially as claiming its unsafe for a 7 year old to go to a park panders to the hysteria that sexual predators are everywhere and more numerous than they actually are. Going to the park at 7 is fine, just how molly coddled is this community.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:53 AM
1

Obviously its based on context, but if your testimony has multiple areas where you have been proven completely wrong then its. Fair to say you are lying. Like a a recent rape accusation where she claimed to have left with the rapist and he made her have sex in his car, and the cctv showed he left way before her and drove off and then she came out etc. ( she claimed rape that night too)
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:51 AM
6

I love seeing the faces of these fucking morons, everyone was exactly as you expect, weak pathetic awkward. There is no donald draper type saying this shit, just a bunch of nerdy losers who are trying to promote themselves thinking if they take responsibility for "white people" everyone will be amazed and impressed about how "open minded" and "thoughtful" they are. In reality they just look like pathetic bigots who clearly hold racist ideologies and think you inherit crime or responsibility base…
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:48 AM
4

Allow me to translate this for you all " i find this offensive to moms " = " i find this advert offensive because it reminds me that i cant keep a man or a father in my life and this advert reminds me of the ways my children and me are missing out because i am a hate filled bigot who chases away men because i have no understanding of compromise or other peoples needs/feelings"
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:29 AM
2

Yes and no, if someone gives false testimony that is later proven false they rightly should be tried for purgery. E.g accuser " i was at the local shops on december 4th and i saw him abuse a child" Defence " records show you were on holiday in another country on december 4th so weren't in the local shops at all "
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:25 AM
0

Yeah you are very very stupid, because you seem to be under some delusion that this is a formal piece of writing, rather an an anonymous internet forum, you moron. If i chose to put little care into formal grammar or proof reading my comment before posting only a complete retarded cretin would infer that this is somehow proof of ability. It takes a special brand of absolute pathetic loser to try and find value and worth in grammar on an internet forum, congrats on being that loser.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 06:57 AM
1

Well do you refer to yourself as a MRA?
/r/MensRights30/07/14 09:22 PM
1

Well yes an no, i think egalitarian is more appropriate but the factual feminist gets no beef from me in calling herself a feminist and if she says something i would listen and give it thought. I am a former statistician and analyst so i have appreciated her understanding of how to actually interpret and understand data for a long time, she knows her shit and she is a good voice of reason from what i have seen.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 09:05 PM
1

Excluding "the factual feminist" she actually is a feminist who isn't a proponent of bullshit and actually understands reality. But yeah pretty much most people who self declares as a "feminist" its usually a huge alarm bell for "angry entitled idiot"
/r/MensRights30/07/14 08:54 PM
1

No surprise there since Feminists are baffled by reality
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:06 PM
1

You know you are in trouble when you have to clarify "you are serious" Also good luck being rich enough without it being financed by your husband to pay $80 an hour to hold your iPad in the bath. Those women do exist but they are not enough to make it a sustainable business. Also any woman who does this just looks incredibly sad and pathetic, with an inferiority complex. Ironically if it was just sexual gratification ( i,e male prostitutes) it would odly be more credible, since they are catering…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:46 PM
0

Absolutely love it, to think some chumps will swallow this entitled bullshit and try and "prove themselves " as "real feminists" in order to worm their way into girls dating circles. I look forward to them trying to "call me out " on my behaviour or conduct, as the one thing that separates male feminists from non feminists is that male feminists are weak nerdy desperate virgins who are socially awkward, and manly men non feminists are physically intimidating people, who don't put up with much cr…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:33 PM
87

You utter shitlord, "Don't teach women how to mow lawns, teach grass not to grow"
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:14 PM
2

tough shit and dont be such a baby, any relationship or investment has risk attached, they could change, they could die in a car crash, they could fall for someone else later. if you never take a risk you just end up doing nothing, there is a risk in horseriding there is a risk in swimming etc stop being such a wussey, if someone seems like a poor investment find someone who is a good one. but don't expect to ever have a completely risk free future
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:15 PM
0

no one really cares what feminists think anyhow, they can be angry all they want they can claim outrage all they like, they hold no influence, they are just batshit toxic children with victim complexes. they were before and they are now.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:29 PM
2

Dear god, i'd wish i could buy you a beer. I so hate all this whining of "i cant talk about my feelings, woe is me the burden of manhood is oh so tough, but really i am a sensitive little princess really" if you want to be a sensitive little sunflower go and be a sensitive little sunflower with other sensitive sunflowers, anyone worth a dam hates all this bullshit whining and "im so deep, my struggle is real" I have a deep seated resentment about people who wallow in their problems and they thin…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:05 PM
-5

"only discusses men" "Paedophilia is not restricted to men - some women also sexually abuse children, although research suggests this is much less common." your hysteria is hysterical , it even explains why it doesn't go into length about it because "RESEARCH SUGGEST THIS IS MUCH LESS COMMON" so your complaint is that the BBC concentrates the majority of its article point reporting on the most common, and not your own unique interest which is statistically much less of an issue/problem. and you …
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:50 PM
-1

Im sure it is very hard for someone like to relate to dawkins in anyway, in the same way as pond life cant relate or sympathise to someone suffering from bankruptcy. your just too fucking stupid to see or understand his point.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:30 PM
2

what sort of moron are you. the entire purpose of pointing out the logic with that example is because that is exactly why it needs highlighting. if you could read he actually stated x and Y and then deliberately applied it to a contentious issue to demonstrate it, thats the point. if people get upset, thats their fucking problem, people shouldn't pander to the ridiculous hysterical batshit nature of morons who cant understand logic or reason. if you think all rape is equal you are a moron.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:23 PM
3

"go away and don’t come back until you’ve learned how to think logically" oh the fucking irony of using an example to demonstrate illogical reasoning, being picked up by hysterical morons who cant think logically. Everything about this reaction pisses me off, especially rebranding "victims" as "survivors" to try and magnify their trauma in a whirlwind of "im special, everybody acknowledge my suffering and use it to give me special treatment", survivor should only be used in the context of its ac…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:18 PM
-6

Here is a suggestion why dont you learn to read instead of writing a letter of complaint "Paedophilia is not restricted to men - some women also sexually abuse children, although research suggests this is much less common." they even provide a link. but why let actual reality get in the way of your victim complex
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:54 PM
3

its a wonderful artistic piece, a handful of individuals stating why they "don't need feminism" feminists respond actually doing the work for them and showing everyone exactly why they don't need feminism. i do love how militant feminists still think that what they approve of or think has some kind of value. its great feminist is akin to "conspiracy theorist" in terms of credability and social status. good job ladies lol
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:24 AM
5

Its like trying to invade and capture the US using a 16th century pirate ship and cannon, if the US respond with anything greater in number or force or technology, then its "their fault". if you attack the strong, dont cry that the strong use their strength.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 08:41 AM
0

Not in the uk.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:52 PM
-2

Nonsense, only in circles of weak people, amongst the cool crowd no one wants to be seen as "that person" because anyone who talks about "issues" is a buzzkill and told to fuck off. I have never heard anyone talk about feminism in such settings ever . Or any activism,
/r/MensRights29/07/14 06:16 PM
-4

I guarantee you the attractive model type women and the traditional girlie girls, don't respect or like feminism or any activist like that (I.e MRAS) Being cool or being mellow and chilled, means you view angry man hating or women hating people with an agenda are seen by everyone as toxic. You try going to a cool party or gathering with really admirable people and start a conversation about male rights or feminism people will look at you like some kind of freak (and rightly so) who has a victim …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:52 PM
-2

Just like reddit is not a reflection of the real world its a collection of socially awkward disillusioned teenagers with no life experience. Feminism isn't really a reflection of the real world, i have never met a feminist in the flesh that identified as such, because women know that Feminists and feminism has all the the intellectual credibility of the tin foil hat brigade, and makes people think you are some angry man hating simpleton with a victim complex. I have had many women (some girlfrie…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:46 PM
3

Tell her you'd prefer a male pilot or male bus driver and see what she says.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:37 PM
2

Love makes fools of us all.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:35 PM
2

I actually really like game of thrones specifically because it does away with the rule book of boring done to death cliche shite. But game of thrones suffers from feminist out speak because it has a nerdy weak demographic, a show like the sopranos is just as sexist and disturbing but was generally watched by older and "cooler" people so you don't get this "pay attention to me everyone and my issues" bullshit peddled by low status women who are trying to make a name or identity for themselves, an…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:34 PM
4

the more you spout feminist bullshit as a man, the less people will want you around or listen to you. If anyone i knew said "rape culture" or " this objectifies women" etc we would look at him as if he had his cock in our drink. Although to be fair we sometimes say shit like that ironically, to make people laugh, i.e guys will say we are off to a strip club, and someone will say " not me i think it degrades and objectifies women" everyone laughs, and off we all go. Although for the record i hate…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:26 PM
1

Stem is still overwhelmingly male, also tech industry and IT.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:19 PM
6

All undermined when he got married and gave his explanation as to why by saying " he grew up"
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:14 PM
2

I once was working for a big insurance agency when email was become the ” new popular thing" and the entire company (huge multinational) was sent a warning about women's safety and the date rape drug progesterex which left women infertile and was a horse tranquilliser. Was total and utter bullshit, but rather than having critical faculties and sensible reasoned judgement to see for themselves they fed the hysteria by forwarding it on to everyone in the company. There was no such drug it was an o…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:13 PM
1

My son has just as much chance as getting a degree as a woman does, degrees don't happen by chance they are the fruits of effort. What people don't understand though is that degrees are not equal, a degree in physics has more value and prestige than a degree in the history of lesbian pottery More women in college is meaningless today because more and more people study irrelevant and meaningless subjects. The hard core useful academic disciplines, the Stem fields are dominated by men still and ha…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:04 PM
2

In boxing i go lightly on girls because its unfair otherwise, if they go hard though i. Go hard back, if it was an actual fight (i.e competition) i would try to knock her head off as i would a guy, right from the start (thats the nature of the game) If i was doing hockey and women were being violent i would be violent right back.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:59 PM
1

Better to ask them if luxembourg invaded the US should the US handicap itself and only retaliate with the same level of force as the aggressor? I.e if a single unit of reserves from luxembourg invade the US, are the US wrong for using more force that their attacker to repel the invasion?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:50 PM
1

They would think its acceptable because they are idiotic morons who cant see their own hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 04:48 PM
1

I went into a bit more detail in another post, seriously i pride myself on being as objective and rational as possible, and the case i witnessed the guy plead guilty ( i actually witnessed it and intervened, i.e he was prosecuted because of me) and his sentence was a joke. It was basically like a parking fine and a workshop , you can get worse penalties from not having a tv license ( i shit you not) . I was utterly dismayed, as a law abiding citizen who values everyones rights to be free from vi…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:19 PM
1

I think you are also being a bit over dramatic with your reaction, more women die from domestic violence than men, saying those who are on the most extreme end of domestic violence and dying as a result are being failed is not really a cause for alarm. You have instead interpreted what she has said as " domestic violence is only about women and we need to stop men doing this crime" . The uk is fairly open to domestic violence against men, they have campaigns and target all groups such as lesbian…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:15 PM
1

Honestly domestic violence isn't taken that seriously in the uk, i intervened in a case where a guy was strangling his girlfriend and was a drunken vicious thug, (she was completely blameless), i shit you not the female police officer who was investigating post incident sided with him (and she was pretty hard nosed and uncompassionate) and his lies, until she met her and me and the other witnesses, and then realised her errors , in her words " i cant believe i felt sorry for him" He got a fine a…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:03 PM
0

Better to concentrate on being aware of what levels to pull and how to actually Effect change than live under an illusion you are helping when you are not. Its easy to make yourself feel better by doing nothing of substance and thinking your hands wash clean, its harder to actually understand how things are connected and targeting your efforts there. A convincing word in the right persons ear at the right time (event) has more effect at the right settings than a million letters from key board wa…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:54 PM
0

I promise you in this instance it will have absolutely zero effect.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:37 PM
0

Do you actually know how the world works, i absolutely promise you that all you will be doing is wasting paper.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:52 AM
2

He shouldn't have said "provoke" he should have said hit/strike/punch If a woman is being angry annoying or hostile thats no grounds to hit her, the instant she feels entitled to try and physically hurt you, you have every moral entitlement to respond in the same manner. What women never learned is that shorter weaker men don't hit stronger bigger men for the reason they get their ass kicked. Women think they should have special protection and be free to hit bigger people with no repercussions. …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:36 AM
126

Fucking hell those "never hit a woman" bitches piss me off massively. 5'4" man hits a 6ft man yeah 6ft man can punch back, 5'4" woman hits a 6ft man he is a monster if he pushes back. Bullshit to that if any adult hits me, you can expect to be hit back, and being a boxer the hit you receive back will be several order of magnitudes stronger than what you dished out. Man or woman, i am nobodies bitch..
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:22 AM
-7

Its time like this i love being a boxer, you can antagonise people like this and when they strike you, you send them to hospital.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:14 AM
0

I am not an MRA or an activist i just hate bullshit and dishonesty, be it feminist or MRA , if you identify as an activist that basically just means "bitter and angry" to me. I sure as hell wouldn't have pathetic feminist or manginas as friends though for the same reason.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:38 AM
1

I finished school decades ago, it was one of my memories of how fucking weak the social sciences are, and how this bullshit propagates without any objective validation.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:58 AM
0

This highlights exactly the problem with many activists mentalities (i.e you ), rather than assessing things on their individual merit/strength/case you automatically assume someone is either 100% right or 100% wrong, based on who they represent or their past unrelated points. Some bat shit feminists who are talking out their arse are still correct on some issues and likewise some rational well adjusted people get things wrong. this simplistic thinking that you cant agree with some and disagree …
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:53 AM
2

Not your problem, if the kids mother is batshit crazy, anything you can do is minimal and will have little to no impact anyway. By appeasing crazy you legitimise crazy, call out bullshit for what it is.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:47 PM
-1

The problem is you are asking others what you can or cannot say or how you express yourself, if i used tomboy and my friend told me i shouldn't use that phrase, i would tell her/him to go fuck themselves. Jesus christ man you had working balls enough to have a child , what happened to them?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:44 PM
9

I see no man there, just a wobbly sack of shit that thinks somehow you can inherit or be responsible for events and actions of others because you happen to share the same gender. What a twat.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:41 PM
4

Im too busy writing to all countries to end all wars. Which has about the same effect.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:35 PM
33

So likewise if a woman is being groped, she should just take it i suppose , and not make it such an issue. as after all it doesn't really physically hurt/damage her so why is she complaining, she should just "woman up" and accept it/take it. If she attacks you or hurts you then she is at fault right? RIGHT? Men should be as expected to take a punch/beating/attack from a woman without complaining/returning/defending, as women should be in taking being groped by a man without complaining/returning…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:34 PM
-1

Who cares, a genuinely nice person is nice because of his values, not because he thinks its a dating strategy. I think too often weak pathetic men think "niceness" will give them a USP to a potential partner, but they don't realise there is an obvious difference between someone who is genuinely a nice guy but could be an arsehole if he wanted to and someone who is a "niceguy" because he has no other choice. I guarantee you that a strong attractive man with power but is nice and decent will captu…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:21 PM
0

Its not a mens rights issue its a human rights issue, its a fucking disgrace but what can we do? I don't support qatar and don't knowingly add to their economy, i would help if i could, but what options are there?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:09 PM
7

Lol i knew what it was going to be without opening it. It really is the same level of delusion, catering to peoples food tastes is the same as catering to their humour tastes. You don't tell the customer "you need to change your tastes to start liking tripe, because i am trying to sell tripe, so learn to like it" If someone has to try and campaign or protest or claim "they are funny" they are not funny. How the customer (audience) perceives you is your problem not theirs, if most people don't fi…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:06 PM
3

I’ve noticed that you’ve adopted a lot of buzzwords. You think these phrases make you seem enlightened. You think you’re proving your feminist cred I can save you all a lot of time, if you want the same "feminist cred" as the author of the article simply 1)piss your pants 2) drool 24/7 3)try to lick your elbows 4)shout instead of talk These 4 simple steps will allow you to be viewed by everyone else in exactly the same way as the true feminist author. You will be indistinguishable from them.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:58 PM
1

"I cannot stress this enough: women do not exist for you to find them attractive" Lol the fucking stupidity, and the irony. I think someone needs to explain where babies come from to this demented idiot. She only exists because someone found her mother "attractive".
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:50 PM
3

It can actually be argued and shown (theoretically) that actually XY is evolutionary speaking the reason men can exceed women in most competencies/fields/capabilities In the shortest possible way of explaining, women are actually genetically more resistant to disease and genetic disorders because a faulty X can be overwritten by a non faulty X since they have two XX, thats why so many disorders and diseases affect men so much more But what they don't tell you is the reverse of this is also true …
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:28 PM
1

Ordinarily i absolutely agree, but if the country has enforced national service for men only they can get royally fucked on this. Edit: sweden ended conscription in 2010 phewwwwww
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:12 PM
1

If this is a country with mandatory national service for men only, i think this could push me over the edge. Talk about fucking hypocrisy to the nth degree (if that is the case) . If you have draconian laws stating by gender you are forced to serve in the armed forces, then your society is not equal and they should be under absolutely no obligation to cater to women at all in terms of equality, because you are not equal. Absolutely fucking disgusting Edit: pheewwww conscription ended in 2010 , w…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:11 PM
1

Couldn't agree more, ladies only clubs smack of "i didn't want to join your club anyway, ill start my own ". Unless a club is formed around an activity or a process or a purpose, its just a pointless "lets invent something to fool ourselves into thinking we are special/elite"
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:07 PM
3

They can and do, you see them more the more wealthy you are or the more poor you are (seriously) Working mens clubs, and gentleman's clubs (not strip clubs)
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:02 PM
7

How many times have you heard a woman say "most of my friends are men" or " i generally get on better with men" If women want to spend their time with other women only, absolutely they should, i hope they enjoy it. They can do what most women do when they group together and start trying to undermine each other by showing off or bragging about material things. Sounds like hell to me. Have you ever noticed guys never really get jealous of the relationship between their girlfriends and their female…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:01 PM
7

I love how university which is supposedly a community of the brightest and most talented routinely has this crap. comparing the real world with academia, one doesn't need to at length show how academia is isolated from all the burdens and horrors of the rest of society, as universities are generally populated by a privileged more stable demographic with less crime and a tighter spectrum of issues and problems than the rest of society (by definition of the entrant requirements age/finance/intelli…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:43 PM
12

Just FYI "shaming tactics" only have any power or value if you actually care or value about the person using them. Stop legitimising crazy, by pandering to these morons. Engaging in debate with crazy people just gives them an avenue to refine their bullshit and think what they think about you somehow matters.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:31 PM
14

Humour really is a completely indefensible field to complain about gender parity. If you are funny people laugh, the entire industry and end product (laughter) is entirely based on peoples perceptions/tastes. (it is literally a service of catering/satisfying to peoples unique tastes) If women are funny they will make you laugh, if they don't make you laugh that isn't your issue that is their failure to be funny. Blaming the audience for not supporting or finding you funny is like opening a resta…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:22 PM
22

Lol the irony of the context of the pussification of men, claiming he can only say that because sjw let him. A strong man will say what he wants and doesn't give 2 shits what sjw say. They can demonize him and ridicule him but he doesn't care why would he. People seem to think they have to convince or get approval from sjw to hold views, but thats only true if you value sjw input, which i sure as hell dont , and dont know why you lot do. PC is only ever an issue for commercial or political marke…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:28 PM
6

I mentioned this in another post somewhere else, but you'll notice these hysterical victim complexes trying to peddle their "acknowledge my oppression" routine only in areas that are populated by nerdy or weak low social status people. You don't hear of this shite at windsurfing conventions or surf competitions or fashion shows etc. Its basically attention whores looking to be significant and using their "oppression" to try and get everyone to give them sympathy and significance, because they ca…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:59 PM
0

Pretty sure you're a feminist, and you're pissed off at the idea that men might help men - even in a single instance - in addition to helping women, and that, sister, is sexist. And that just further highlights how stupid and clueless you are.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 12:02 PM
1

Uk domestic violence laws are a joke anyway, i intervened in a case where a guy was strangling his girlfriend and beating her up, and all he got was community service and some pathetic fine. He should have seen jail.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 11:06 AM
-1

You are an embarrassment to yourself and others, the fact you cant see how massively hypocritical you are being and emotional hysterical beggars belief. You clearly have issues, the fact you make this about domestic violence specifically when no one has mentioned it all, shows just how irrational and emotionally loaded and hysterical you are. (and you have the nerve to accuse others of false dichotomy) You are as bad as the bat shit feminists and their victim complex. "listen guys only help guys…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:54 AM
4

You ever notice how you never hear of sexism or oppression at windsurfing conventions or fashion shows or surfing events etc. I could tell you years ago that comic con would get the "victim complex treatment" as with any other nerdy non mainstream interest hobby or interest (like atheism did years ago) It doesn't take a genius to spot that whiney moaners with victim complex trying to gain significance and attention can only do so in an environment with weak naive inexperienced nerds who try and …
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:29 AM
1

Not sure what country this is but I'm pretty fucking sure it is illegal and a jail able offence. Shitty quality video though.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:11 AM
1

I wonder what her boyfriend thinks...oh yeah thats right.......
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:07 AM
-3

So presumably you will take no issue or concern about a specialist group to help or support women only, in an area/field that they feel is under supported then right? As its the same logic as you have just displayed. Your entire posts is ridiculous, and is hypocritical extreme feminist level thinking. Help people based on need, their gender has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:04 AM
4

This post is bullshit, help someone in need regardless of gender. Edit: you realise that down voting this statement is a nail in your own coffin, when it comes to complaining about sexism against you. "help someone in need regardless of gender" --- down vote away , you are only showing how hysterical and jaded you are. to everyone normal/reasonable
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:21 AM
1

Reverse image search the picture of the receipt and make sure its not a generic one
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:18 AM
3

I remember this horseshit from a sociology teacher once when i was in school , she was moaning on about "sons and daughters" was sexist for the same reason. I tried to explain it was just the cadence of the phrase, she wasn't having any of it, then i pointed out "black and white" and under her identical retarded logic that means black people are held in higher regard/privilege in society etc Than whites , as "black and white " is routine and no one really says "white and black" She was an Absolu…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:15 AM
4

You are much wiser than most people i have met here, what you say is absolutely true, women want to enjoy sexual enjoyment without the associated lowering of worth or responsibility/guilt for doing so. Its guilt free sexual promiscuity, however often things that feel amazing in fantasy are actually not anything like it in reality. For example having sex as a student with an older really hot teacher might float the boat of many people in their minds, but when it actually cones down to it , you ca…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:21 AM
1

I cant help but think the managers are big fatties themselves,
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:01 AM
8

Can someone summarise what happened here, I'm new.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:23 AM
3

What if i told you skin is several layers thick, And cuts/abrasion can got through some or all of them. No matter how tough or insensitive the outside layer. Idiot
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:43 AM
24

The daily mail has as much credibility as a random internet poll.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:39 PM
10

Oddly enough i have recently had the same thing, it was rubbing on my swimming shorts when i went for a massive 4hour swim. Luckily i am uncircumcised and it was a friction rash on the outside, i cant begin to imagine how much it must hurt of the actual head. In the UK most are uncircumcised, i find it odd so many in the us are, you must lose all sensitivity. Foreskins exist for a reason.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:33 PM
12

I read something once (not sure if it was true) a woman's BOSS took pity on her as she was losing her apartment and had a child and he let her and the kid stay with him for a while for her to get back on her feet (he wasn't dating her). She sued him for future child support as he Was "acting like a father to a child" in supporting her and the kid, and some states have some laws where if you have supported a child you are responsible for its future up to 18. And she won, i seriously think i would…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:27 PM
2

Yes absolutely i would help anyone in genuine trouble (that wasn't their own making), if a was able and it was the right thing to do. I would absolutely not help someone though who was deliberately one of these people who always expects others to serve them.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:20 PM
3

Yeah I saw that, its actually good training for women to fight men because when they compete against other women for titles its less hard. I think many people grow up watching scrawny model looking women ninja kicking men and punching them through windows and think "yeah i could do that" What actually happens is that they end up in a world of shit and you see it when they get hit hard, rarely if ever do you see a trained woman aggressively fight an equally trained guy, they usually hang back and…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:48 PM
-1

I assume you are basing that on gym videos on youtube, as a snivelling pip-squeak like you probably has never been to a gym because its "too intimidating" Good luck with that princess, perhaps you can start a tumble blog about it.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:09 PM
2

Based on a sample of 1, which is meaningless.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:33 PM
2

Well if thats what they claim there are other more extreme or terrible examples than this.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:38 PM
1

Of course, but the stronger and harder and better trained you are the more you can consolidate all your intended damage in one strike. So that by objective assessment they hit you, you hit them back just once and then stopped, showing restraint when the threat was over. But you know you deliberately hit hard and hit to damage.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:37 PM
0

Seems you have no experience in fighting/training years of punching heavy bags and focus mitts conditions your hands and strengthens your wrist. I can punch you without a glove much harder than you can punch me without a glove because my hands and wrists become conditioned over the years. Its still less than gloves, but i can still knock you put and break your jaw without gloves and without breaking my hands.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:34 PM
-3

As you are clearly a grade A massive cunt and they tolerate you, you shouldn't really complain about how others are perceived. As its so important to you, i have some bad news for you, not only are you a cunt you are a winging pathetic weak cunt that is an embarrassment to himself and anyone who associates with you Take your bullshit to tumblr they are more receptive to your kind, i.e whining pathetic insecure morons.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 03:30 PM
8

you seem to be under some sort of illusion that i seek or want your approval or friendship.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:54 PM
3

ha ha how humiliating, this isn't a men's rights issue though. hate to break it to you but many senior men in the Navy have had affairs.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:38 PM
2

as pointed out somewhere else this is illegal in the entire EU as of 2012
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:34 PM
6

My boxing class is mixed, i genuinely love seeing new women join up thinking they are tough and a force to be reckoned with, and the look on their face once they get hit is hilarious. most women have never actually been hit, and they are still only getting hit lightly by us in sparring, but still the tears and shock is beautiful to see. also enjoy it when karate types who have never been hit properly think they are hot shit, and their face after taking a pretty decent power punch for the first t…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:23 PM
2

women's sport will never be taken seriously because men's sport is faster meaner and more extreme. a few exceptions are gymnastics and a handful of others, where women's versions are so unique that they are at the most extreme end of that sport. Formula 1 is popular because it represents the high end extreme of racing, men's sport and competition is the same reason. but even ignoring all that, chess is a game that has absolutely zero discrimination either directly or indirectly (e.g you don't ne…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:45 PM
4

Don't worry with your lack of intellect you couldn't be, its easy to mount a defence in causing greater than average damage in a self defence confrontation as a boxer. because damage that would take someone else several punches, i can do it one. one strike to an aggressor is perfectly reasonable in self defence, especially if they are a stranger. i.e you stike me, i strike you back knocking you out and stop, only one punch thrown and you have a broken jaw and are knocked out. someone else would …
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:39 PM
3

it worked for murder. i had killed 17 people until someone actually told me it was wrong....whoops
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:14 PM
3

so your argument is the patriarchy thinks men are weak, because it tells some men that they are not actually acting like men, by being weak some stellar logic there Einstein.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:13 PM
1

yeah the patriarchy treats men as idiots just look at all of scientific and engineering history, its clear that men were seen as drooling simpletons.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:10 PM
2

waste of time, anyone can and should wear whatever they like, including dresses if you want as a boy. the main difference is that guys will lose respect for you, and you will become a low status "loser" in the community. boys especially young boys worship strength power and ability, like ninjas or superheros or wrestling etc. if you appear to be a "girly boy" everyone just thinks you are a "weak boy" and no one likes a weak boy. i sure as hell wouldn't want to wear pink to school, but i wear pin…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:05 PM
1

what some women don't seem to understand is that they need romantic partner love as much (it can be argued actually even more) than men do. If a girlfriend has a self entitled princess mentality there is nothing stopping you ditching her and going with someone else at a moments notice, you owe her nothing. what these dopey women dont understand is that if all your bring to the table is sexual appeal or lust, you are competing in a market where your value is always diminishing and your competitio…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:59 AM
5

In other news if Luxembourg decides to invade the US, the US must not use its larger arsenal or significantly greater military strength because that would be unfair in the same way, they should only use exactly the same equipment and force as the invading army. Horseshit like this pisses me off alot, you have no right to hurt or assault anyone, if any adult thinks they are entitled to hurt another, the defending party is well within his rights morally to use all his capability to defend and stop…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:40 AM
8

yeah just like when a 5'4'' scrawny man walks into a bar and spits in a 6'4 muscular guys drink. he would never kick his ass lol If someone is bigger and more capable than you all the more reason you don't provoke a physical altercation, as you are the one who is going to pay the price. The idea you must somehow handicap your ability to protect someone who wishes and has caused you harm if fucking ridiculous. I am a boxer/thai boxer, if anyone hits me, (including women) they get hit back, and hu…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 11:31 AM
-1

You are clearly a fucking idiot, so much so you cant even comprehend basic sentences. Im not wasting my time walking a child through basic logic 101, think what you like , i don't care, you are too stupid to bother with. Goodbye
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:54 PM
-5

So are you claiming before women paid alimony there was absolutely no coverage or news items or talking points about alimony at any point are you? So when the host says "men have been complaining for years about alimony" he is referring to personal friends of his is he? Does someone have to explain to you that when a demographic changes it becomes news worthy and a talking point. If women everywhere suddenly all took up baseball that too would be news worthy because of the "change" it doesn't me…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 11:19 PM
0

That is my point
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:59 PM
-9

You need to understand the meaning of "gender neutral law" You have to be retarded not to see that the people who are complaining about alimony are and always have been those who are paying it. Just how stupid are you that you cant understand women complaining about paying alimony are just the allies of men paying alimony. Just because you are female doesn't mean you are some how responsible for alimony payments some other woman got. People who pay alimony complain about it, nothing has changed,…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:58 PM
-6

From the moron who cant even understand what alimony is and how it works. But you go ahead little sunflower tell us all how the system is against you and laws specifically state that only men must pay alimony, and all the women ordered to pay alimony are just a conspiracy. Time for the tin foil hat i think dipshit
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:32 PM
-1

You haven't really thought this through have you. Women complaining about having to pay alimony are the same people/victims as the men who complain about having to pay alimony. Man and women are not two sentient entities. Only people who have been recipients of alimony and then complained about having to pay alimony are hypocrites. Being female and complaining about having to pay alimony is no less credible than being male and having to pay alimony. Thinking that because traditionally other wome…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:28 PM
-4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy4YkeBLnD0 Guess these people are all lying then, might want to see a doctor about your hysterical victim complex. edit: more concise version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xCXuvdAywg
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:08 PM
1

Well as a former analyst/statistician i can tell you that anyone who publishes any comparison between genders without actually performing a like for like basis is serving an agenda or is an extremely unqualified appalling statistician/analyst. Anyone who is qualified and genuinely objective knows there is absolutely zero value in comparing males versus females as a single entity. Its actually misleading and extremely irresponsible, so much so that various statistical authorities have absolutely …
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:04 PM
-3

You are arguing FOR my point, the differences in pay and hours between gender isn't because of gender but due to lifestyle choices. Comparisons can only be compared on like for like basis, i.e identical jobs between identically trained people who both never been married, and have the same family commitments (i.e none). You are basically proving my point. Its lifestyle not gender driven disparity.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 09:05 PM
6

No shit sherlock, if your partner doesn't feel obliged to take care of your needs why should you care. Plenty of people out there that actually do care about satisfying their partners needs/desires. And do things they don't feel like doing or don't want to do purely to please their partner. A relationship can only really function if both people get something out of it beneficial. Once someone doesn't hold their end of the bargain up (what ever that is) its time to find a new trading partner.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:52 PM
-1

Those laws are applicable to both genders and are a result of marriage, which is a legally binding contract /arrangement (women pay alimony if the roles are reversed, the laws are gender neutral). But if you get married thats your business and you make that declaration/agreement (no one is forcing you to marry) , in a relationship outside of marriage there is no obligation to either party for any form of support at all (in any form) (child support is applicable to both parties where relevant).
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:06 PM
0

What about female on female sexual harassment or male on male sexual harassment. They will need a whole new set of photos. Lets not be so ridiculous
/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:10 PM
0

This is just as much bullshit as the pay gap, men populate higher hour positions and working environments by choice (you try asking for a fag break during a firefight with insurgents). Both this and the "pay gap" are just bullshit, its not anti man or anti women, its just what you would expect with people having equal opportunity but different tastes or leanings to different fields. Lets not pull the same bullshit feminists pull.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:59 PM
84

"Women dont owe you shit " ignoring the double negative, no shit sherlock. Of course women don't owe you anything but by the same extension men dont, owe women anything, if you pay all the rent and the bills and you decided you get bored with your girlfriend you can throw her out that very same day. Sorry ladies "men don't owe you shit" they don't have to subsidies our living expenses they don't have to be a shoulder to cry on they don't even have to talk to you, if you want to go down the road …
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:52 PM
1

Yeah surrounding context is not important at all to an issue of sex and consent. Just how retarded exactly are you? I guess in your mind, a man in a balaclava at knife point grabbing a stranger and forcefully having sex with them, is identical to a wife who has had a few too many tequilas and come home drunk and horny and had sex with her ex-husband , but in the morning with a hangover is all regretful for doing it. In your demented mind those two events are probably identical aren't they.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:36 PM
1

Haaaaaaaannnng onnnnnnnn. Where is the outrage and victim blaming accusations about teaching children not to accept sweets from strangers or to talk to strangers. By feminist logic, teaching kids to be safe and not accept sweets from strangers is the same thing, "DONT TEACH KIDS NOT TO ACCEPT SWEETS FROM STRANGERS, TEACH PEDOPHILES NOT TO RAPE CHILDREN" Only makes sense in the deluded and broken mind of the hysterical, self entitled victim complex feminist.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:32 PM
0

You should probably be informed, state sponsored genocide is very much a no too, just incase you were planning a career on that. Also setting people on fire and torturing them until death is very much frowned upon, so you and your friends ought to be aware of that too. The more you know.....
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:26 PM
1

Your responses just get funnier and funnier. its some grade A performance art right there.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:19 PM
2

Oh the irony of you calling other people dumb.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 04:15 PM
2

Go read a fucking dictionary and learn what equality means, also get an adult to tell you how laws work and why they exist. Im not going to educate you for free. Bye.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:40 PM
2

Your right for example a school was offering cakes at different rates based on gender, we should work hard so that all forms if discrimination are irradicated. There is nothing to discuss, they broke the law its not a debate, we dont "have to try and convince them" you either obey the law or you get punished. don't bother responding you have nothing of value to add it seems
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:17 PM
0

Good and then we can hear people moaning there are no male role models etc. I have zero sympathy for those that moan, if you automatically cast suspicion based on someones gender, that gender will withdraw its support and you are left to pick up the pieces.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:12 PM
0

Agreed unless there is obvious explanation that is undermined by you not revealing something earlier on . For example being accused of stealing your own car, it cast suspicion if only in court do you produce documentation its your car and have at no point claimed it was your car earlier on etc.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 03:10 PM
0

Like opening a door being nice is not a gender issue, if a woman is in trouble and needs help i will help her if i can, i will do exactly the same for a guy. If a women is not polite or thankful for my assistance i wont help her in future, the same if a guy does it, i wont help him. I must say though that in terms of genuine friendships i think i am really thankful I'm a guy, women seem to have more fickle and temperamental friendships , i have never seen or know a guy get jealous of his girlfri…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:56 PM
1

This guy is pathetic, he was given the chance of filing charges (felonies some serious) and he refused. If i was him the instant they got aggressive i would make it clear they touch me i will "touch back" and still file charges. These bitches deserve to have their life ruined they are thieving scum, and thieving scum who think they can fight their out of their own pile of shit with violence. I would happily punch her in the face as hard as i could if she ever hit me.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:43 PM
-1

So some sort of elephant shield is what you are suggesting instead of an extra toilet?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:39 PM
8

Gonna need a follow up of what happened to her, she better have been arrested and jailed
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:27 PM
-9

I don't think anyone here would deny the suffragette movement, they threw themselves in front of horses, took forced feedings etc. If the state doesn't recognise your right as a stakeholder in its affairs by recognising your right to vote i have every sympathy with people who engage in arson and bombings against the state (but not innocent individuals) .
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:25 PM
3

Speak to a lawyer/solicitor go through your evidence, threaten litigation for libel and defamation of character. If she wants to unfold the system to try and unfairly and unjustly ruin you, make the system bite back and take her to court and the cleaners.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:21 PM
4

Simple solution to show these bat shits feminists how retarded they are. Change "rape" to "muggings" do you still find the poster offensive? now imagine how stupid someone looks and sounds who did find a poster warning others about muggers targeting drunk people offensive, thats how stupid these NUS feminist morons appear.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:13 PM
15

So presumably all those safe sex campaigns against HIV are victim blaming too i guess. Don't teach me to wear a condom in order to minimise my risk of contracting HIV/AIDS teach those with HIV/AIDS not to have sex or always with protection. Fucking moronic, this is what happens when you have a campaign (feminism) that isn't based on objective reason and is instead just a bunch of hysterical self entitled morons looking for a fight to make up for their own inadequacy.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:09 PM
3

Love it, yours is better than mine, i would genuinely love to see the reaction if someone had a placard with your example at one of these protests. Id buy them a beer for sure.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:46 PM
2

Well i for one don't want him or his contributions, if he is too dense to understand how an existing anti discrimination law not only invalidates the point of an "equality bake sale" (since laws exists specifically to disallow discrimination), it actually violates the discrimination law itself, as its highly discriminatory. He is an absolute retard.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:16 AM
0

As expected an emotional outpouring thinking you are the victim because you are too dense to understand the law is gender neutral and if you stayed home and cared for the kids you would be afforded all the privileges of custody etc that you are complaining about. But who cares, you go ahead and isolate yourself in the community, there is already animosity against f4j and they have just climbed buildings etc, the day you start inconveniencing people especially on the m25 you will see everyone tur…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:12 AM
1

And how you respond is how someone with a victim complex would.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:06 AM
3

No your logically abilities are failing you. The evidence that there is no need for an "equality bake sale" is the existence of the law which they will be punished with specifically making it illegal to discriminate against anyone for pretty much any birth trait.(race sex sexuality etc) Only a total moron cant see this, its fucking pathetic, and if the are campaigning about discrimination escaping the law THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING. Its like having a sponsored duck hunt with real shotgu…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 10:05 AM
1

Aka how to get everyone to hate you and not support your cause. If you think you can hold the m25 ransom and hold up innocent commuters to make a point you will be isolated and hated by all.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:55 AM
1

Depends on the advertising standards in your country, if its in the uk it breaches advertising standards and ofcom would investigate and force the radio station to issue an on air apology.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:52 AM
6

There was a report many many years ago in the news when drink spiking was the new bogey man and the police said having been exposed to hundreds and thousands of allegations, very very few were genuine, it was just people under reporting what they actually drank themselves.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:44 AM
52

Don't tell me to wear a motorcycle helmet, tell other drivers not to crash into me.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:40 AM
12

Fucking disgrace the way this was reported.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:38 AM
0

I have seen various signs that were legit and similar to what you describe, i.e women 10% off, blacks 20% off disabled 30% off etc. Basically it implied a ranking of worth based on these traits but the morons didnt understand that, i.e it was offensive if you were at the bottom because the price list basically implied by being x you were the least capable/able and needed the most support.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:18 AM
2

Not in the EU they dont.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:13 AM
4

No one cares what you approve of, thats why laws are clear. If you are too stupid to see the hypocrisy in social justice warriors violating anti discrimination laws in order to spread the message of "anti discriminate" then you need professional help. Even a child can see the absolutely hilariously absurd retardness of the entire concept. Perhaps they can also make "anti sweat shop badges/bands" but to maximise the number they should probably get a sweat shop to make them to keep the price down.…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:12 AM
3

I had none of that crap when i was at uni, and strangely i spent my first year in an all female hall of residence (too boring to explain, am not transexual or anything like that, there were 4 of us guys in total). Never heard any feminist crap at all, but that was many many years ago (well over a decade now)
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:02 AM
1

Well lets hope "dem feels" keep you warm when you have been bankrupted by litigation and living in a tent, because courts and rule of law generally rely on objective reasoning, based in logical consistency, for which you have zero talent for. But don't take my word for it, you go ahead and write that poem to the judge about "dem feels" and how your precious little snowflake feelings should override any objective logical merits. Good luck with that princess.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 11:53 PM
2

I did actually have a first break at university, but thats because we had 6 hours of continuous labs some days. But obviously that wasn't uni wide.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 11:48 PM
6

As pointed out before you don't understand how laws work.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:56 PM
6

I should have guessed you were some sort of idiotic activist. No wonder you cant see the ludicrously stupid hypocritical bullshit of the campaign. Too busy with "dem feeels"
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:51 PM
7

And what you don't understand is that in order to obtain genuine equality which is what the protestors are trying to do, a law has been passed making it illegal to offer any goods or services by a private or public body to offer different terms or charges based on a number of things including gender. So these dipshits are violating an equality law (which exists purely to enable create equality) in order to promote equality. Its absolutely indefensible, you have to have special needs not to see t…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:49 PM
5

I agree to legal action because the absolute retards think they are promoting equality by actually violating equality law. Its like having a conference on anti-semitism with a sign saying "no kykes allowed". Its the absolute fucking hypocrisy that lights my fires.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:37 PM
5

Seems you don't understand the simple concept of what exchanging goods for money is. You are too stupid to bother with, consider us "done"
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:35 PM
5

Lol, yeah should probably ignore anyone charging 5p more to blacks too, as after all I'm not black it doesn't affect me. Guess the law is only applicable if you can be bothered. Im sure you are right its much better to just allow people who are trying to declare themselves as bastions of equality to break equality laws and engage in illegal discrimination to spread their message of "don't discriminate" Clearly you are a genius.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:27 PM
6

Again you clearly don't understand how laws work, its the same directive, selling cakes for 7p more to men is punishable to exactly the same degree and same law as selling for 7p more to blacks. Im done with you if you cant understand this simple concept. It falls under exactly the same directive (law)
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:17 PM
2

Its still a mans world despite what people will try and make you believe. You can see this most of all in older age, in the media etc men are still considered useful and cutting edge or experts with age, women are generally ignored once they pass their prime. I would always prefer to be a man if i had my time again, its a harder start and a lonelier youth, but this allows you to develop and work on your skills and become something better and better, i think for women they get too much too young …
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:14 PM
2

I disagree, in fact in the UK there are loads and loads of programs which essentially tell women what not to wear and how this makes you look fat etc. Trinny and susanna were two women that would basically just insult mostly women on how they look awful, and give advice to all other women how they should dress and what not to wear etc, And Gok wan, a guy does the same but in a friendlier manner and he is generally well liked i think. They had their critics, but never ever heard it as a feminist/…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:09 PM
4

Looks like you don't know how law works, its the principle you idiot and sexual discrimination (as with race etc) has unlimited compensation limits. It isn't for the financial loss of 7p but the punishment and deterrent effect on the establishment and also the insult and abuse on demeaning a gender into paying more or being treated differently. You try defending selling drinks at 5p more to black people and use the "its only 5p" when you get rightly sued under the same directive, you will not on…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:57 PM
1

The original poster should just respond with "i don't need feminism because i actually can get a boyfriend"
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:52 PM
1

This would be illegal in the EU didn't know australia was so backward.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:49 PM
3

No, but its worth threatening litigation to get their attention. This is outright illegal sexual discrimination, and anyone with any legal knowledge knows this, so you threaten, they then send it to their lawyers who say "shit they actually have a case" and advise doing something to avoid going down that path, hence they print your prewritten apology and sign it.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:46 PM
2

Which is exactly the problem of hysterical "feels" True justice has a burden attached to it, to protect the innocent sometimes the guilty walk free. but some people (i call them cunts, both men and women) think everything should bend and adjust to their personal "feels" and they don't have to objectively satisfy criteria to establish or verify another's actions either to themselves or to authorities. One issue i have repeatedly encountered with some women in particular is that they think if they…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:44 PM
0

If he wanted to be difficult yes, but what is your point exactly? Because of your own assumptions about genders this interaction between two people is a gender issue? You sound like a hysterical feminists, this is an interaction between two people that is all, there is no gender issue here, the only issue is your own baseless assumptions
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:36 PM
3

Yes absolutely, Edit: although private clubs are allowed to restrict membership i believe, i.e you can have a male only golf club or women only gym, etc but if the service or product is available to both genders (such as a nightclub) they cannot impose different rules or rates on either gender either directly or indirectly (i.e skirts get in free)
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:28 PM
1

Any and every history or science book ever written.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:28 PM
2

How is this a mens rights issue? lets not catalogue any and every disagreement between a woman and a man as a gender issue. This is just shitty business
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:19 PM
-6

Pitchforks down everyone, do i have to remind you that this shit is deemed acceptable because society knows it isn't true. The weak mocking the strong is deemed ok/funny, the strong mocking the weak not acceptable at all. Have no illusions, this and the bumbling idiotic man cliche are merely statements that we in society actually accept men as capable powerful and strong. To illustrate this point replace "men" with "adult" and "women " with "child" A child finding a magic app that lets it contro…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:10 PM
3

Couldn't agree more, I'm sure we would all help compiling a decent letter to the dean for you, and if any solicitors are reading this they might give some advice to put the fear of litigation to an institute.(something they do worry about) EU Laws specifically exist so shit like this doesn't fly, what they have done is illegal and the fact its under the guise of "equality" really pisses me (and i suspect everyone else). Absolute bullshit this was done, shut the shit down , you owe it to your com…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:52 PM
10

Courts aren't stupid, there is no justification for a differing donation based on sex, the flyer clearly shows cakes for sale at various differing prices based on your gender. The only genuine defence they could mount is if the cakes were different and called "man" and "woman" and any individual could purchase any of the two types. But its still a bullshit defence, if its isn't supported with evidence, the two displayed cakes are identical. If you got evidence (i.e video )of you being refused a …
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:44 PM
12

I assume with "college" you mean university. write a strongly worded letter get law students or anyone you know who is a solicitor to review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_2004/113/EC which is the specific directive, and make it clear by actively allowing the promotion of a different price structure based solely on gender segregation, they are actively implicit in violating the directive and as such you feel personally undervalued/humiliated and violated, and by allowing this event to ta…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:25 PM
3

There needs to be a valid database to name and shame all proven false accusers so they can live as social lepers, and nobody has any contact with them in anyway. if i knew someone who falsely accused someone of rape, id never speak to them again and remove them from my life (as i would actual rapists)
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:51 PM
3

drafts absolutely piss me off like no other. i genuinely believe if you have been drafted or eligible to be drafted, then you should get 2 votes. its absolutely disgusting that on gender alone, someone is made to kill or be killed for a nation and yet those who don't are afforded all the same rights and powers as those that are forced to defend the nation. being in the armed services by choice is different, if a nation forces you to defend the nation, your say in the nation should count for more…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:39 PM
45

This is actually illegal in the UK (prices suggest its in the UK) and illegal in the whole of the EU. European court of human rights brought new legislation in 2010 (implementation deadline 2012) that no goods or services can be discriminated against based on gender (and many other things) they cannot charge different rates for car insurance due to that, they sure as hell cannot implement different prices for genders. i would complain to the dean and point them to the appropriate ECHR directive …
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:28 PM
1

Not really an expert on scottish law (it is different from english law) but fairly sure you can legally not invite them into your house and refuse the "warning", since you are Not under arrest and they don't have a warrant.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:53 PM
20

Oh the irony of her tweet "if i speak up the place will be a safer place for women"
/r/MensRights21/07/14 06:46 PM
5

I like the photographer moaning about divorce and how she has to pay him money and brags about how she has two mortgage free houses, and slyly mentions she received a divorce settlement herself. absolute fucking hypocritical bitch
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 08:32 AM
6

yes its satire, and not a serious video.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 10:29 PM
25

call me Nostodamus but i predict this woman is going to be strung along by lots of men claiming to be in it for the long term and then they mysteriously lose interest when she wants greater commitment. because no sane man wants a woman who is self described as "independent, strong and assertive" because she really means self obsessed argumentative ego maniac who thinks everything should be about her.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 10:26 PM
7

you are correct for example what the people who complain about men in adverts and media in particular dont seem to understand is that mocking men and dads etc in adverts is only considered acceptable society wide because as a society we actually accept and understand its not true and men are strong and capable. if you replace woman with "child" it is easier to see, adults being scared and being beaten up up a small child in a movie for example is funny and acceptable the reverse is offensive bec…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 08:47 AM
9

Who cares what they want, I, and I'm sure nobody else will change anything just to suit them. If a bunch of "strong independant womyn" are moaning that people don't want to be with them its music to my ears. no one owes anyone a relationship, if you cant attract a partner or have unrealistic standards your loneliness is entirely your fault. literally vote with your feet with who you wish to support and pursue, you hold no duty or care to "strong independent black wymn" if they cant give you what…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 08:07 AM
2

oh the irony of you having such a victim complex about this. I'm sure you would apply your same reasoning with the song 'blurred lines' contributing with "Rape culture" a woman making a good song that is popular about a specific person living a shallow existence is all it is, it doesn't make any greater statement about society or women, unless you are one of these SJW who thinks anything and everything must somehow fit into your personal crusade. This song.....is just a song, dont be so overly r…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 06:13 PM
3

i dont understand what this has to do with Redpill?, a woman can make a song about her or someone else or anyone, it makes no statement that "women in general are like this" or anything else. you are intentionally looking for an issue here.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 04:57 PM
70

its funny because on casual appearance there seems to be a trend that only ugly dateless losers (both men and women) tend to be vocal feminists, and those against such nonsense are normal looking or even good looking people.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 03:09 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJGZM2jtMpg&list=UUmb8hO2ilV9vRa8cilis88A
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 11:30 PM
1

Absolutely love it, She is right that women can live the fairy tale and have a rich attractive and perfect prince of a guy and not have to settle. problem is the women who actually are attractive and good enough to do that are as rare as the people they are seeking. this dopey woman hasn't quite realised that millionaires dont become millionaires by blind chance, (excluding lottery etc). they become millionaire by putting their needs and desires and interests above others and amassing wealth. It…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 09:38 AM
3

This is why i like being a boxer, you get to call people out on their threats and knowing that the odds are in your favour. some middle aged man with a belly comes wandering in making alot of noise, and trying to scare you, you calmly explain your side of the story and if he doesnt accept it and gets violent you absolutely destroy him. people who use violence or the threat of violence in the adult world deserve to get their "wake up call" when they try it on someone much more capable than they a…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 09:21 AM
1

After spending some time in my local wetherspoons that explains everything, if i based a gender on Wetherspoon id never leave my house. the clientele are absolutely vile monsters, (ignoring students/very young. as its cheap)
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 09:16 AM
-2

so by the same logic as this demented woman's mind when a man divorces he should get absolute 50% custody in all cases, since "he put his child caring on hold" and sacrificed his time with his family to go to work, at the expense of family time, and so its only fair that post divorce his relationship with his kids doesn't suffer because of his sacrifice. at this point however i must point out, and its a particular annoyance with me that people who complain that divorce etc is "Unfair on men" hav…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 09:12 AM
2

this would be just as believable if the "unicorn" was literally a unicorn in the story, total bullshit
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 09:00 AM
4

Chinese men terrified of not finding a wife, US men terrified of having a wife, i think i see a solution.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 08:54 PM
1

Yeah but it could be worse, many chinese girls were killed hence the "surplus"
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 08:51 PM
7

I don't believe its genuine at all, there are obvious tells that its fake (in style) as there is no justification or attempt at justifying the act. Its just a rushed list of events after the author gives up putting any effort in it, after the start. Bullshit-ometer is on high
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 08:38 PM
3

A damaged woman must accept feminism, else who else is to blame for all her failures and low social status and toxic personality? Herself? Don't be silly. In the western world, feminists and feminism is just code for "self entitled victim complex of bitter and jaded failures" rarely will you ever hear it in a context that isn't proceeded by some logically invalid self entitled bullshit completely unvalidated and pandering to hysterical morons. The first step to self improvement is realistically …
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 08:34 PM
1

Its quite interesting this, as I tried to imagine how i would act to your responses if they were from a woman i was interested in, and i responded the same as the actual woman did. I would honestly think i would just ignore you, and think you were a bitch, and my life is better without you in it, so how she can still like you, is a testament to her differences to me.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 08:09 PM
1

Absolutely no sympathy at all, if you are a pathetic SJW routinely pandering to delusional morons, i don't give two shits if those morons turn on you arbitrarily and use their bullshit on you. No shits given.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 07:03 PM
3

I remember reading a news feature where feminists gave dating advice like mens magazines routinely do (the premise was women taking over writing the typical 'lads mags' for one issue) and they honestly thought their advice was brilliant and the men had got it all wrong. One of their "top tips" to attract/date a girlfriend was "read up on the history of women's rights, she will be impressed and think of you as a real man for knowing women's issues and struggles" Lol good luck with that guys, i re…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 06:59 PM
1

i.e where are all the feminists campaigning that more women should be locked up etc? too busy demanding 50% representation in the top/highest paid areas and not those at the bottom. but of course they will say men commit more crimes than women (which they do) but they fail to realise if you accept biological sex is linked to certain behavioural traits/actions (in this case crimes), then it completely invalidates the claim of equal representation. I hate feminists for the exact same reason (and M…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 08:04 PM
1

the whole video is like an expertly crafted satire.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 06:56 PM
-13

no because there is not a real threat of actually hooking up and stealing the partner, that middle aged woman's kiss is just like a charity kissing booth, its a bit of fun. not all women are moronic overly hysterical idiots, kissing in this context is not a big deal. if the woman was gorgeous and model like, it would be a bigger deal, but its just pantomime "lets all have a laugh"nonsense likewise if you reverse the genders, provided its clear the man being kissed is old ugly and fat enough for …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 06:53 PM
1

i know this post is old but i just stumbled on it, My Parents told me the same thing, turns out its complete bullshit. Unless you are married or have children you cannot and will not ever be held responsible for a partners debts/bills/expenses unless you specifically cosigned a contract stating so (in the UK). Infact additionally you don't owe partners debts either, so if you wife before marriage has a debt of £10k and then marries you, that's still her debt and bailiffs cannot seize your proper…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 06:08 PM
-19

its harmless fun, lets not be overly precious sunflowers, if as a middle aged fat bald man you kissed Jessica alba in the same context ,it would be taken in the same way
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 05:34 PM
2

couldn't have put it better myself
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 05:21 PM
1

absolutely zero sympathy. he is the architect of his own downfall.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 05:20 PM
-12

Protip: If she is worried for her health and the "men" are medical doctor specifically OBGYN. then RE-BOARD SHIP.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 05:11 PM
4

in case you don't hate her enough, this is more "fruit" from her mind and just as hypocritical: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH-5b04cTcE the dopey bitch doesn't seem to understand what "freedom of speech" is, and how complaining at others "speech" directly compromises the principle.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 05:01 PM
9

Because they probably pay really well lol :)
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 04:23 PM
4

well spotted, but it all depends on detail and context. it could be valid and it could not be. as if his "suspicious lurking" is as a result of days of odd behaviour and lurking, seen and recorded by authorities that isn't the same as her seeing someone standing there as she enters the building. i.e it depends with by what yardstick are they measuring "suspiciously lurking behaviour" the video mentions days but we dont have the details
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 02:55 PM
1

good im glad you think that and i hope you hold yourself to the same standard. I hope when you are much older and you look back at any retarded shit you did when blind drunk you accept that this is a reflection of a permanently tainted character, and as such accept that you can never be anything more because if you can or could then it extends to others too, which you seem to have a problem with. I hope that burden sits with you well.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 02:46 PM
0

yeah its pretty clear you are a fucking moron, tagged as "idiot" and set to ignore.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 02:41 PM
1

Well in her native country if such a competition was held but instead of sex games it was "waiting tables" or "cleaning toilets" or whatever. the deception would be criminal and she would be a victim,in every sense, legally/morally etc what you are doing is exactly what batshit hysterical feminists you probably complain about do, in that you think one failure in one area suddenly invalidates everything. if you think her loose morals or outllandish behaviour or sex deviance, invalidates injustice…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 02:38 PM
1

I agree, it probably would, and that would be a complete load of horseshit. but we cant really get upset about speculation, to actually be legit annoyed we need a comparable example.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 02:34 PM
0

ok by the same logic if you get heavily pissed up out of your face on alcohol at 19 and start random fights with strangers one night, your future wife and logically conclude you probably not worth marrying when you are 45. and you would have no issue with that
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 02:31 PM
1

did I write or claim any such thing? answer: NO
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 02:28 PM
1

We must use generalisations to describe the world, but when we say stuff like "women want X" or "women like Y", its really nothing but generalisations, because there are many different kinds of women, with many different wants who were raised in different families with and they have different value systems and expectations That's self evident, your stories actually undermine your claim, since if you are of the mind we cant make generalisations over something as vast and complex as human values a…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:56 PM
-4

not really, people do change how you were at 19 wont be who you are at 45. you dont become forever tainted just because you had 24 penises in your mouth for less than a second
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:50 PM
3

Here are my issues with the video (i have seen it) 1) she is a victim, a victim of deception, she thought she was winning a holiday but it was a drink called a holiday (that is not really fair) 2) looking to see if the bar broke the law or not is perfectly Ok. 3) she is pretty forceful in the actual video and not all the guys seem to be that willing or able to decide, if the genders where reversed and a guy had to perform oral sex on women and behaved in exactly the same manor ( and the receiver…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:48 PM
2

The start of the video (paraphrased) " institution x and y is being sued by the victim of a sexual assualt victim stating the school failed to have adequate security measures to protect/prevent the assault" End of the video "How long will we have to wait for the blame for rape is placed where it belongs WITH THE RAPIST, i guess its too much to ask "
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:38 PM
8

if you watch it again you can actually see her trying to "think her way out of it", and you can see the point the audiences patience finally is lost and they start jeering at her as she starts rambling about "high fees" towards the end of the video
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:21 PM
9

except no one is buying her shit and the audience rightly scoffs in her face this is the British equivalent of firing hand guns at the stage.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:19 PM
13

yeah she completely had a massive personal go at him in the media before that talk about being a racist etc, and asked him about tax in the middle of him making a point (he isnt and hasn't every been labelled a tax cheat in anyway), the audience rightly called her out on her bullshit. was great
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:18 PM
2

I don't understand this? and this is where i differ from the redpill. I don't "waste my time" trying to trick someone into sleeping with me, if i find I don't value their company or time, why would I spend any time with them at all, sex or not. talking and spending time with women you are interested in isn't some chore to get sex, its supposed to be something that you like doing. of course you dont owe anyone anything so if you dont want to spend time with someone for whatever reason you dont ha…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 01:12 PM
0

I feel exactly the same with "men's rights", if genuine equality of opportunity and legal representation is what you want you don't ignore either gender. lets not pretend that feminists are the only bat shit crazy morons, the MRAs are just as demented.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:57 PM
0

nothing wrong having regulation on adverts, if it wasn't an advert i would have a problem, but its an advert
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:50 PM
1

Not only that i agree that if any advertising campaign causes significant distress or alarm to a reasonable public and generates large justified complains an advertising watchdog should have the power to stop them. however if this wasnt an advert then i would have no problem, i find the message offensive and ridiculous, but i find many things offensive and ridiculous, most of all censoring free speech and free thought (isnt applicable to adverts though)
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:48 PM
2

i wish i read your response before i replied, i said almost exactly the same thing
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:37 PM
2

If the question was "who do you think is a better person?" or "who would you rather have as a friend?" even the slutty / attractive girls would choose the ones without a slutty FB pic. It has nothing to do with competence and everything to do with how women, beneath all their delusions and hamsters, recognize the core truth of dating economics - sluts are a low value commodity for anything that requires commitment and responsibility, whether that be a job or relationship. I disagree with your co…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:36 PM
12

and? anyone can go to "college" it means nothing. if you took the top 10% of the top colleges in the top 10% of respected fields i bet you'll find none of them are strippers or cam whores.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:29 PM
3

I could have told you that for free, Muscular men are seen as "less intelligent" than weedy men with glasses or put another way "young men with sexy social media photos seen as less competent" This is just people looking for a reason to blame all their inadequacies or failures "on society"
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:23 PM
1

I watched the video a couple of times, this woman's blind mental retardation is simply staggering This dopey bitch thinks you can sue other parties for being partly responsible for your rape, (despite actually saying "its entirely the rapists fault/responsibility ") and then be outraged when those blamed parties claim the suing party had failures and irresponsibilities too. Its beggars belief someone can be so retarded, if its entirely the rapists fault (which it is) then that completely undermi…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 06:53 PM
9

you missed "loud and obnoxious "
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 06:32 PM
5

Just like a house divided against itself cannot stand, when you are a group which has thrown all objective validation or reasoning out the window, don't be too surprised if your own members splinter off doing the same. In the real world, this happened with genuine women unions in the UK, they started out as significant group that couldn't be ignored, and then as members starting playing the victim card against others members (since there were no men to blame) they all splintered off into smaller…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 06:22 PM
11

I have no sympathy for him or his problems, if you pander to wild delusion for convenience, your suffering or unhappiness is no longer my concern. this should be in justice porn.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 04:31 PM
1

but "white knights" are pussies, if they weren't pussies they wouldn't be white knights
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 04:20 PM
3

as a boxer/thai boxer of many many years if a line is drawn between men that make rape jokes and men that get offended at rape jokes, its a no contest slaughter. if someone wants to fight me because of an obvious joke about rape, ill happily fight them. just what sort of community do you live in exactly?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 04:18 PM
-7

Lol oh dear god this is tragic, i actually genuinely cant be bothered to walk you through just how retarded you are being, not my problem, think what you like, its your burden to carry.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 04:35 PM
-9

Some grade A retard shit right there, you think men are different and diverse to each other, but all women are the same. Diagnosis: butt hurt.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 04:19 PM
-10

If you genuinely hand on heart believe that, i feel genuinely sorry for you,
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 04:08 PM
-12

If you are dumb enough to think something like all women have a group consensus like they do in askwomen or twox then you have bigger problems than that. Women are as diverse and different as men are. Some like some things others hate them. Askmen or ask women etc are all total moron magnets, unless your question is literally gender specific (e.g. what age did you start your period), asking a diverse group for a consensus is the hallmark of the retard. Things like "women of reddit, how can i mak…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 04:05 PM
0

Sympathy indeed, but it still doesn't detract from the fact that if you are incapable of doing something or understanding something very basic and fundamental, for whatever reason, this undermines your claim of being valuable/capable/significant in areas such as regarding affairs of justice and the nation. At some point a minimal comprehension must be accepted for someone to be self reliant/responsible/capable to live alone and be legally recognised as capable of having responsibility of ones ac…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 03:40 PM
2

The issue i have ( as a slight aside) on this issue is how on the one hand can someone claim they are too ignorant or uneducated or incapable to understand the basic premise of numbers and percentages and compound interest, and their ignorance/education/inability should relieve them of the responsibility And on the other hand feel entitled to have input and power over politics and affairs of the nation/law, justice Either you meet the criteria for very basic responsible adulthood behaviour and a…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 03:20 PM
1

Bang on, a good analogy. The more i think about it, the more it pisses me off, i hope she has a hard life.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 03:11 PM
2

He can decline sex and say i don't want this as a physical relationship, he doesn't have to elaborate unless she asks and wants to explore further. Its really not a hard concept if someone has a attribute they cannot change (old skin) telling them its a major issue has little value to anyone.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 02:23 PM
1

So if any woman is an idiot or incapable its a Red pill issue? I'll save you all a lot of time there are over 3.5 billion females in this world, there are many many idiotic, retarded, dangerous, mentally ill, psychopathic, people in that "pool" as there are with all males. This post has no value at all.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 02:14 PM
2

Lol, made me laugh especially the analyse to death posts from women on reddit in a way no actual alpha ever would. Pretty bang on, i am no "red piller", in as much as there is no awakening or shift of insight, and i don't have a strategy or "game" or whatever it is these people do. Im just here for the submissions of feminist bullshit or self entitled idiotic reasoning (on both sides) that i like to see and laugh at or critique. Seems though that many people here just have victim complexes and a…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 02:01 PM
2

They are all getting " proper fucked"
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 01:16 PM
-6

But even if you had no attraction to women at all, you would still have women chase you and want to have sex with you. Gay men for example, have absolutely no sexual desire for women, yet some women chase and go crazy for them despite they are "going their own way " wrt female attention/love etc.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 01:12 PM
1

you realise you and the comments here are essentially "dont have anything of value as you will ultimately lose it or risk losing it" and could be used to never make friends as ultimately they will die and you will lose them and have the pain of bereavement. anything worth anything has risk in it. dont be "that guy"
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:39 PM
1

Got a link to that or more reading i am interested, sounds a good parable
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:36 PM
2

Cheating during a relationship is a gray area for me, you don't owe the other person anything makes me lose all sympathy with you, cheating is cheating, its unacceptable in a relationship, its even more unacceptable in a marriage unless your partner is informed its an open relationship or marriage but then it isnt classified as cheating. you really are not being fair or valid. your distinction is just arbitrary.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:35 PM
0

why are you so sensitive to this? who cares? ignoring the fact its obviously a comedy film, women can feel as entitled as they want wrt to how a man should be etc, that doesn't mean anything. its supply and demand, women can expect all men to pander to them unconditionally if they want, they will be paying the price of loneliness and people leaving them. men are under no obligation or duty to be with anyone, if you don't satify or cater to his desires/needs etc he will go to someone who will. an…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:24 PM
0

who cares about what other people moan about your preferences, if you dont like someone for whatever reason that's your business. women can be as picky as they like, the result is they will be lonely. men can also be as picky as they like chances are they will be lonely too. people cant tell you, "you must like me" if you dont like someone or want to be with them thats all that matters. deluded peoples opinions have no value on anyone preferences
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 10:00 AM
-7

becuase if you really a MGOTOW then no body knows you are a MGOTOW, since there is no need to make a statement etc. if relationships or sex lose their significance to you and you want to solely pursue other interests, who can tell, who would know? Any self declared MGOTOW should rightly be mocked because by declaring it or making a statement you are no longer a MGOTOW and simply some butthurt pussy basically saying "waaaa, nobody likes me, im going home" with the view of making people pander to …
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 09:54 AM
-9

becuase if you really a MGOTOW then no body knows you are a MGOTOW, since there is no need to make a statement etc. if relationships or sex lose their significance to you and you want to solely pursue other interests, who can tell, who would know? Any self declared MGOTOW should rightly be mocked because by declaring it or making a statement you are no longer a MGOTOW and simply some butthurt pussy basically saying "waaaa, nobody likes me, im going home" with the view of making people pander to …
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 09:54 AM
-2

because you cant undo or change ageing. if it was something mendable changeable then yeah honesty can be beneficial, but when something is fixed much like someone with terrible facial burns or scars, you don't "tell em how it is" unless you are some kind of autistic monster. you can lose fat, you cant undo time, however if honesty is what you value you still sound like a little bitch boy who is bitter that people pandered to your feelings and you feel you have been misled and seem quite jaded ab…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 01:00 AM
4

"typical reddit" is a treasure trove of retarded people, non stop amusement, i assure you
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:44 AM
13

there isnt really much one can do about ageing skin (practically) asking someone to cover up isnt really the same. as for hair and all the other stuff, absolutely. but to be fair to her, she stuck to her guns and didn't pursue it because she didnt want to compromise and that's fair enough. if she then moans that "there are no good men" etc then she is being a dick, but its perfectly ok to not accept a partner because you dont want to change. no one jas a duty to find or be with a partner, its yo…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:42 AM
6

in his own words I love your energy and your laughter. I like your head and your heart. not forgetting that "drive many miles to someones door" and sometimes "cook dinner" is something you would do to a good same sex friend that you have no interest obviously in romantically/sexually. if he got nothing out of it, he wouldnt want to continue, clearly to him she had value
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:38 AM
-9

I disagree with this one, the guy is an arse, if someone had a disability or physical impairment and approached you for a date you wouldn't just say "i like you but your birthmark or skin condition makes you unattractive to me so we cant ever be physical" it might be absolutely true, but anyone with even the basic level of empathy and compassion for others wouldnt be so recklessly blunt. and would try and delicately reject them without hurting them. I disgaree with anyone being blunt about anyth…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:30 AM
16

It happens now, how many times have you heard dipshits trying to blame loan companies or credit card companies for giving them a loan/credit that they couldn't pay back or had no hope of paying back when they took it out. that is entirely 100% the customers fault, if someone offers you a loan with 5000+% APR and you take it out thats entirely your fault and responsibility, but not in their minds , its the companies fault etc.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:15 AM
17

brings my piss to the boil someone can be such a massive self entitled cunt (if that is indeed what she meant/happened). how delusional can you be to think somehow he owes you a relationship entirely on your terms because you need what he has for the life you want. I mean its fucking mental illness territory to be so fucking delusional. you not being able to leave because it impacts what support or assistance you get from him, is entirely your decision. absolute victim complex. she needs a good …
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 12:04 AM
65

We were dating. I was in his bed of my own free will. Well, considering my life circumstances "free will" is rather subjective. And he knew it. There wasn't a way for me to make my life work if I left. are you fucking kidding me? this sounds like a self entitled bitch who is with her boyfriend because she needs his stuff/things/support whatever claiming she was raped because he wanted sex and she "couldn't be bothered to explain" or didn't want to lose his support/relationship. talk about a self…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 10:23 PM
66

there is a number you should call, you don't have to suffer in silence, be strong you can get through this.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 10:06 PM
11

I'm sure this will be the patriarchy's fault somehow
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 09:49 PM
2

It's probably because the idea that people can be put into two binary psychological groups is bordering 5th grade science project tier laughable. truly fucking hilarious, funniest comment i have seen in a long long time, but only made funny because it was posted in "askwomen" which obviously exists on the premise of " the idea that people can be put into two binary psychological groups" (would be just as funny in askmen of course). but even if you exclude gender, is she really claiming a questio…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 07:23 PM
3

quite interesting to see the terminology he uses, in particular "if we want x we need to convince y" no "make" not "force" etc, but convince. rarely do you hear that sort of terminology in typical feminist videos
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 07:14 PM
1

Never read the books, based entirely on the show my opinion was. some of the strongest non patronising female leads i have seen
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 05:15 PM
23

how rock n roll your life must be
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 05:01 PM
29

is this your first day on the internet this is vanilla compared to some stuff out there.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:55 PM
5

there are people who do that and like it, even on reddit /r/pegging (obviously NSFW) i, like you, didnt know what it meant and clicked it to find out.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:45 PM
2

Obviously i dont believe the post is genuine, but even if not, there is nothing wrong with enjoying kinky sex that is counter your beliefs/usual philosophy. i bet people here would enjoy some kinky dominatrix or equivalent for a bit of spice. it doesnt really show much in my eyes.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:42 PM
10

it means wearing a strap on as a woman and having anal sex with a man. as if it was a just a casual comment to include "oh btw..."
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:38 PM
3

She felt entitled to the win because she had achieved a higher level of essentially theory than me lol hilarious, lets hope any attacker or competition takes that into the account and hands her victory because of "heart" what i have noticed as a worrying trend is quite a few people think effort is a perfect substitute for results/reality. i.e the only thing that they think matters is effort and effort alone, but anyone who isnt a moron, knows it isnt about effort its about the right effort in th…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:33 PM
1

don't forget that "love" is a product of evolutionary psychology also (as is grief from bereavement) if you truly understand evolutionary psychology and what its implications are it doest negate any of the emotional intensity of a partner/relationship/experience, all it does is give you a grounding that you and others are not the unique special magical sunflowers you thought you were (if you did) i.e evolutionary psychology does not mean that you cant fall in love with a partner and stay with th…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:21 PM
7

I train and teach boxing/thai boxing, its a mixed sex gym, and in the beginners class women always start off thinking they are going to be a force to be reckoned with etc, and more times than not after a while they sort of accept they they cannot even remotely compare with the guys. Guys are much more brutal, more resilient to pain, and generally push themselves much harder. Its pretty frightening how often you hear some women who have just taken up something like boxercise or taekwondo and thin…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:06 PM
30

an instant "im out" regarding media is when you have some 90lb woman ninja kicking some 7ft 300lb monster and knocking him out. its good to see strong and intimidating women on screen but not when they are supposedly strong in a completely false and fictitious way. Ironically Game of thrones is very good because in my eyes because it doesn't pander to insanity and pretend some 4ft woman can kill a 9ft man, instead the strength and power of the female characters (which is in no short supply) is i…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 02:35 PM
52

The casual pegging reference was the suspicion for me "Oh btw i peg him"
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 02:15 PM
1

Just want to quickly thank OP for asking this, I've wondered about the best ways to allow a lady feel as safe as possible in this situation, just never thought to ask here. Thank you ladies for all of your helpful responses! Dear god, this is so tragic, imagine getting into an argument with some girl he fancies, and him trying to white knight and calm things down or "defend her position", i would love to see what he looks like, I'm guessing foetus faced scrawny and awkward looking.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:55 PM
2

Couldn't agree more, its as offensive and fucking retarded.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:30 PM
2

You could use the same argument against people concerned with "false allegations" as if that should be a major priority when there are much more serious and common concerns. It works both ways and isn't limited to a certain gender
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:28 PM
1

The opposite is "ask the gentlemen of reddit" You can guess how that would go down, it would all be fedora advice etc.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:25 PM
2

And making people who don't pander to hysteria seem more threatening as they don't do what you do which will become expected the more people do it.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:24 PM
1

I remember when i arrived at university there was a leaflet about "how to be safe" etc. and one of the points actually advised men to cross the other side of the road if there was a loan female walking so not to frighten her. It wasn't a rule obviously but i actually said out loud, "fuck that" as if i have to pander to the insecurities of morons and go out of my way because they assume all men are rapists. They will try this bullshit everywhere.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:22 PM
5

I'm all for truth, but you have to be careful you don't go too far the other way too. Yes society sugar coats the ugly truth and plays rainbows and sunshine over some pretty unpleasant realities, but a lot of stuff i have seen posted by some people is not true either and paints relationships or social interactions as a survivalist dog eat dog jungle more extreme than it actually is.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 10:09 PM
8

my favourite part is the rolling of the eyes when she says "If you still want to talk". yeah sure thing princess. if you are such a sensitive little sun flower that you think someone calling you pretty i makes you feel unsafe etc, got a feeling no one wants to hear what you say.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 09:41 AM
-1

Because if the man doesn't know you or owe you anything, the woman is entirely at fault. One of the most stupid comments i have seen in a long time.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 10:30 PM
2

I have no sympathy for this guy, because he didn't press charges, he let them get away with it (reading the news about it) I would punish them to the full extent of the law, i have to abide by the law and moderate my behaviour accordingly so should they. Letting them go is utterly pathetic, and it was serious charges
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 09:34 PM
2

telling women that their feelings are just wrong, that they don’t have the right to feel the way that they do. Minimizing somebody else’s feelings is a way of controlling them. If they no longer trust their own feelings and instincts, they come to rely on someone else to tell them how they’re supposed to feel. Oh the fucking irony, considering he is TELLING US that our interpretation (feelings) of someone elses reactions/thoughts are incorrect. What an absolute moron. Even a child can see this h…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 09:26 PM
4

It genuinely doesn't matter, other peoples bodies are absolutely your right to find attractive or disgusting however and for whatever reason you wish. However how you conduct yourself in public, and what you say or do does matter. If i found someone incredibly ugly facially i wouldn't tell them because it would hurt their feelings, i would say nothing. Decorum and concern for others is a good thing
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 09:16 PM
10

Wow she sounds like a catch.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 08:58 PM
1

You have filly descended into tin foil hat territory now, congratulations. Im done with you, you have no further value to me at all.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 08:56 PM
2

Is this not well known? Haven't you ever heard " its not what you know, its who you know" People rate well liked people higher than angry loners.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 08:54 PM
11

Its unbecoming to shame anyone in public for anything unless its genuinely a socially or moral a repugnant thing to do (like shitting in the street) or that impacts others ( littering ) People should be free to dress/eat/exercise as little or as much as they like without strangers making knowingly rude and thoughtless comments to them (its just basic decency) That said you don't have to ever justify your preference or what you find beautiful, if you don't find appealing anyone over 90lb or 100lb…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 08:46 PM
-1

Yeah such a rarity, men never strike other men, especially over something as trivial as sleeping with your wife.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 07:01 PM
1

Oh dear god, If you want to play top trumps with positions and people ill give you two you can try and best. President of united states (you'll find he actually needs to influence people aka voters) Warren buffet/bill gates (either or), much loved and with a huge humanitarian component. But either way im done really, your beliefs will be your burden to bear not mine.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 06:40 PM
1

And chances are if your posts are serious and you continue without reflecting on just how vile and self centred you sound, they will both be identically the same to you (i.e 0) Because friendship and "love" wont exist in your life. Of course I'm sure you will find a way to blame someone else, and think its because you are just too "alpha" lol or whatever. Just FYI solo people with no friends and radiate a "fuck you im out for me" mentality are not top of the chain, they get chucked out of the gr…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 06:27 PM
1

I don't think you understand how social media works it isn't a one way stream where you are free to broadcast any and all mundane opinions, and then claim outrage when anyone dares voice their opinion at your actions. If you engage yourself in social media or use your identity/personality to address the public and make content specifically for the public you can rightly expect the public to give "feedback"
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 06:04 PM
1

Glad to here it, I couldn't believe what i was reading. Do some people genuinely live their lives thinking there are no such things as friends and all women are prey and completely interchangeable etc? What a lonely life that must be.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:56 PM
0

If you cant understand how posting something online to a public persona on a medium specifically for comment/opinions, and actively seeking out your neighbour to "tell it how it is" then god help you.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:34 PM
3

Oh dear god the mental gymnastics and failure of comprehension you show is staggering. at no point have i said she isn't to blame, absolutely she is to blame but so is he. I cant believe anyone is so retarded enough they cant see the hypocrisy of "don't be so stupid to throw away 5 years of friendship because your friend slept with your wife, it was a mistake everyone makes them" And "dump that bitch as she cheated on you with your friend, get another wife/girlfriend, one that wont cheat on you"…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:32 PM
-1

I think you are confused, i never claimed she is not responsible, she is absolutely without question responsible. Its not either or. If a friend or stranger hit on my girlfriend/wife knowing she is a girlfriend/wife then he has a problem if i find out. Because i will wish him harm and if present will give him harm, thats the issue. If you think you are entitled to try it on with anyone regardless of relationship status you will get your head kicked it.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:24 PM
3

If we are playing story time someone i know went to prison for taking a hammer to his girlfriend and her lover on discovering them together (tried for attempted murder initial, but is out now) You want to play the "fuck everyone else, I'm looking out for me" thats fine, prison is filled with people who think the same. You piss off enough people you'll find your prize. I also like how you assume because i hold a guy responsible for his own actions of knowingly pursuing my partner/girlfriend that …
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:11 PM
-1

My neighbour of course i wouldn't, but a social media "personality" intent on sharing and detailing events in a public forum, fucking right i would.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:04 PM
-1

You would when you're getting your head kicked in.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 05:03 PM
2

I have always wondered why theredpill is considered by some as so vile and full of bitter children, seems i have found my answer. If you genuinely think a man knowingly pursuing your girlfriend or wife is tolerable and not something to hold against him you are going to have a hard life, you are also going to get seriously beaten up.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:53 PM
1

No one said she isnt, he is still responsible also though, as cheating doesn't occur without his actions /approval also. It takes two to tango.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:45 PM
-1

If you were a stranger and i came home to find you in bed with my wife and i know you knew she was married) I'm sending you through the fucking window. Of course you are not "cheating on me" but you are Knowingly complicit in betraying my marriage.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:43 PM
1

You are a really vile guy. If you were my "friend" and you tried it on with my wife id knock you out.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:36 PM
1

If they don't know she is married or in a relationship then of course its not their fault. But seems rather unlikely you would be drinking with a husband and wife and the husband goes off to bed and you sleep with the wife and not realise or know they are married or in a relationship
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:33 PM
-4

Oh my god you cannot be serious. You genuinely have no issue or blame against the guy actively trying and succeeding to sleep with a married woman. I am speechless
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:20 PM
-7

I really hope you are joking. If you think a man sleeps with a knowingly married woman, he doesn't share in the responsibility i don't know what planet you live on
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:12 PM
1

And you think in "us" the other persons desires/needs/emotions don't matter? I want to make to my partner happy, because if i didn't they wouldn't be my partner, i expect the same from her. If she is too self absorbed its bye bye , like wise i expect to be kicked to the kerb if i become the same. Wanting the best for your partner is normal and healthy.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 03:58 PM
-2

Why is it white knighting to show disapproval against someone who knowingly sleeps with a married woman? If i had a wife and some guy knowingly slept with her, id be angry at her sure, i would also be angry at him.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 03:52 PM
54

single, Mommy-to-be. that has winner written all over it
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 03:30 PM
1

the whole charge minors for child pornography for pictures of themselves is absolutely fucking ridiculous anyway. its total bullshit, if the law deems you too young to make informed and sensible decisions regarding consensual sex, how can you be charged with criminal sexual deviant behaviour. prosecution of one undermines the other. especially as they are pictures of YOURSELF its the price of having puritan roots in your culture
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 03:19 PM
3

"double standard" I love it. simple basic elementary school maths will tell you that in a population of roughly 50:50 if there is an oversupply of suitors attention in one area, of life (i.e young women get oversupply of attention) its at the expense of under-supply elsewhere. this woman is a complete self entitled idiot
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 03:10 PM
1

who would have thought that in a marriage your partners desires/needs/emotions would matter. you live you learn.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 02:57 PM
1

You are a complete idiot, if someone attacks you, you don't hit them as softly as you can and then increase the power with the danger. You are fully entitled to respond with a pull power punch until the threat passes which if you break his jaw will be after one punch. If you punched me, and i broke your jaw with one punch in immediate response, and it was all videoed (provable) i would bot be prosecuted at all. You live in a complete fantasy world.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 11:50 PM
1

Again total and utter nonsense. If you attack me and i in one punch break your jaw in self defence its easily explained as i am a boxer so hit harder than most people. The instant your jaw is broken there are no follow up injuries. You live in a fantasy world, any half decent lawyer can put a decent case together that a stranger attacking a boxer is more likely to receive significant injuries than an average person simply by virtue of the increased power. You also dont understand assault or what…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 09:44 PM
0

Absolute nonsense, if someone strikes you anyone who isn't retarded can claim an un provoked attack clearly indicated intent to harm, and you don't just sit there and wait to see if more attacks occur, you deal with the threat and neutralise it. I could confidently defend punching and breaking your jaw (im a boxer) if you punched me in the arm based on certain set contexts If we were long time friends, maybe not, but strangers certainly, You are under no obligation to "wait and see"
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:33 PM
3

Reminds me When i was at university a friend of mine said he and his friends drove around shouting abuse out of the window (this guy was about 7ft tall and a boxer). He literally meant "abuse" as in the word. They all thought it was hilarious, which it did seem at the time. ABBBBUUSSSEEE.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:27 PM
4

I have been sexually harassed, molested, and "cat called" by women on several occasions. It didn't bother me at all, i didn't see myself as a victim and if anything was flattered/mildly embarrassed but there was no danger. Some people are socially awkward and don't know " the rules" but at any point i can and am able to overpower any female "attacker" Besides I'm not deluded enough to think no incidence of being embarrassed or feeling a bit awkward by the behaviour of others is a reality. If som…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:24 PM
-2

Threats are perfectly acceptable if they are on the condition of someone committing a prohibited attack on you. If i threaten you by saying "if you ever hit me again i will punch you so hard i will break your jaw" that is perfectly valid. The threat is not a threat its a conditional retaliation to an aggressive attack, which is not only legal its perfectly valid morally too. They are completely safe and unharmed id they do not attack you. So it isn't a threat in anyway.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:44 PM
-2

This is bullshit, hitting anyone is unacceptable, if this isn't raised in HR it damages your credibility should something else happen further down the line.(why didnt you come to us). If the company keep her on following a HR complaint and it happens again you can sue the company. Personally if i wanted to not go down the HR route i would wait till she is alone and make it very clear if she ever hits you again you will batter her so hard she will need hospital treatment. There is no excuse for p…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:21 PM
11

Absolutely not, if hysterical morons think its not their problem to fly off the handle and wildly accuse someone of pedophilia based on absolutely no evidence, then they can suffer the price of having their children more vulnerable, by losing the cooperation of those they have no concern over falsely accusing There is a burden of real justice, because it is objective to be as fair as possible to both parties, hysterical people think they don't have to suffer this burden and can just wildly accus…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:14 PM
0

Personally, i would get a catalogue of evidence, then register my concerns with the police setting my intentions to leave or do whatever. Then if she hits me again i would punch her back and really hurt her, if you go to the police with your evidence before the event it stands to your credit no end. I.e going to the police formally registering your problem with evidence before you defend yourself will stop her playing the victim card and let any objective part see the reality. Provided you have …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:01 PM
1

academia is renowned for being pathetically at odds with reality. in the UK you don't enter academia until you are a legally responsible adult, university having processes and specialist regimes wrt to justice and issues etc shows how weak and incapable the community is compared to society. responsible adults dont need specialist treatment and sensitivity regarding issues like sexism etc, its pathetic and shows students as naive weak minded morons incapable of functioning in the real world, 99% …
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:25 AM
0

This is daily mail shite, if they introduce a compulsory module in education against domestic violence and about criminality etc then there is no issue, but dressing it up as feminism etc is just bullshit nonsense. i bet the actual details are less extreme than this shitty newspaper tries to paint
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:02 AM
2

came here specifically to post this knowing you will find it as annoying as i do, regarding the batshit logic of some campaigners: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzQOyWF8HOA The logic this woman displays is fucking atrocious, she smugly and condescendingly tries to point out that the responsibility for the rape lies solely WITH THE RAPIST using the context of a case where victims are suing the establishment not the rapist for the rape. it is one of the most logically piss poor arguments there is…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 12:48 PM
1

did a search for "take me out" on reddit and found this post, i am not a MRA at all, but thought you would love this article http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/10569013/Take-Me-Out-A-tacky-nightclub-televised.html tries to deamonize it on the grounds its degrading to women !!! Im sure you will enjoy reading it lol
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter