~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | A question for feminists (it never gets answered ever)While they may try to define men and masculinity they have so far failed to adequately do so. There's a reason there are male feminists but no feminist men. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/22 12:12 AM |
| 8 | A question for feminists (it never gets answered ever)So "real feminism" is what, like less than 1% of the so-called feminist movement? You feel confident that you get to define what "real feminism" is rather than the vast majority of the people involved? This is a "no true feminism" argument whereby you're attempting to eliminate better than 99% of the feminist movement. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/22 10:04 PM |
| 1 | Can anyone explain for me?Were you making the point that strength is important even in many non-combat jobs? Because that's certainly true. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/22 10:49 PM |
| 1 | Can anyone explain for me?True, and drafting women for non-combat duties would actually make sense. But it still doesn't fully address the basic unfairness of the draft since women would only get drafted into the safe jobs and the men would go to the front lines and be subject to death/injury. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/22 05:09 PM |
| -1 | Can anyone explain for me?Even if they weren't equal, which I believe they are in almost all cases... They aren't. The differences between male and female are significant not only physically but mentally. This is most easily demonstrated by the fact that we use the words feminine and masculine to describe not only physique but temperament as well. We use two different words to describe the traits of two very different sexes. ...discrimination by sex is still sexism. Yes, and it's not a useful word to use if the sexes are… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 09:09 PM |
| 3 | Can anyone explain for me?See your argument is that sexism is ok as long as there are benefits. This is a strawman argument, I never said that. I said a male only draft is used because it works best. That's neither a promotion nor a condemnation of the current policy. Regardless, the word "sexism" is only useful in a reality where the two sexes are equal. Since that's not the case, it's a word without utility. I believe the current system of the male-only draft is morally wrong, not because it's sexist, but because males… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 08:33 PM |
| 4 | Can anyone explain for me?And while not easy... Great, now imagine yourself 40%+ weaker and understand that even with training most women cannot ever get as competent with a rifle as your average man. The draft is a sexist policy that discriminates against males. Of course it is. And as outraged as you may be about it that doesn't change the fact that the reason the draft is male only is because men are generally leagues better at combat than women are. As sexist as it is, it works. ...there are already women in the army… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 07:56 PM |
| 3 | The way we identify men is some of the most sexist, disgusting things I've seenI don't understand this complaint. Masculinity (being a man) is defined by the traits that heterosexual females find attractive in males. To be more/less of a man is determined by the extent you exhibit these traits. The 'not real men' are called males, as in "male feminist". They can't be called 'feminist men' because that implies a level of masculinity/sexual attraction that is generally not present in that population. By the way, this is also why feminists get so upset when they are referred … | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 07:41 PM |
| 4 | Can anyone explain for me?Strength makes a difference for so many things in combat. Boiling it down to 'Both women and men will die from a bullet.' is extremely simplistic. For example, marching to an engagement carrying all the equipment you need. Physical strength determines how much equipment you can carry, how far you can travel, how fast you arrive, and how exhausted you are when you get there. Wielding a gun takes a certain level of physical strength, that almost any adult would have. Tell me you've never used a lo… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 06:46 PM |
| 3 | Kathy Griffin whines about her fee for hosting NYE telecast on CNN, tries to claim gender pay gap, is firmly slapped down.There are plenty of places where women are still severely disenfranchised. Stats show that women generally don't want to go into tech. They are, by and large, uninterested in software engineering. What's feminism's role in this 'issue'? While discrimination results in disparity, every disparity isn't the result of discrimination. I would expect a software engineer to understand this simple principle. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 22/06/21 02:07 PM |
| 3 | Saw her video on r/iamatotalpieceofshit a couple of days ago where she leaves in her Mercedes within a spilt second after taking photo with a drill, purely done for social media points. Well deserved justice.The population size DOES matter Total population size would only matter if the police interaction rates for the black and white population were identical. They are not, therefore total population can't be used. Another way of looking at your information is that black people commit roughly 50% of the violent crime and yet they only make up 24% of the deaths at the hands of the police. All other things being equal, they should experience 50% of the deaths. Black people are killed by police at a ra… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/06/20 07:57 PM |
| 1 | Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission SaysBut you see where I'm coming from right? He didn't say "pathway to support" he said "pathway to service". The reporter also specified Americans, not service members. This is the same language that was being used by Obama when he was trying to form the brownshirts a civil service organization that was as well funded and equipped as the military. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/03/20 04:53 PM |
| 1 | Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission SaysHeck also said the commission planned to chart a "cradle-to-grave pathway to service" for Americans. Let's hope this was just a poorly worded quote. Citizens serving the state from "cradle to grave" is something that happens in dictatorships or socialist/communist countries. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/03/20 03:16 PM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseAmusing, you've gone from putting words in my mouth via strawman fallacies to actually making up fake quotes for me. You're triggered so hard you're only able to respond with logical fallacies. Several ad hominems, a genetic fallacy and at least one strawman, good job there sport. How very unoriginal of you, typical and predictable leftist. I'll just point out that I called your degeneration into fallacious reasoning a couple posts ago... ...you're triggered into full blown logical fallacy terri… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/18 04:52 AM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseI don't need to know what good things identity Politics or progressive politics are about... Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!! Suggesting that anything good has ever come out of either of those. Also, you're still here? P.S. That's another strawman, I didn't limit myself to the 1950s. No attempt at communism/socialism has ever succeeded except on a very small scale. P.P.S. 'Progressive' politics are, in fact, regressive since they promote the failed ideologies of the past. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/18 03:27 AM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the Muse...you don't feel you have to know jack shit to talk about something. Ah, one of the leftist's greatest fallback strategies the strawman argument. I didn't say you don't need to know jack shit, I said you only need to know what the results of implementing a particular ideology are. If an ideology produces bad outcomes, it's a bad ideology. This is particularly true when the ideology under discussion has a long and infamous record of horrible results (see socialism and communism). Welp, now that … | /r/MensRights | 25/08/18 01:12 AM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseRidiculous. You don't have to know how a gun works to know you don't want to be shot, and you don't need to know anything about communist theory to know you don't want to be starved, executed, sent to the gulag, etc. by a communist regime. To break down exactly why an ideology sucks you'd need to know how it works. To justifiably hate an ideology you simply need to see what it accomplishes. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/18 07:21 PM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseSJW is just another way of saying leftist You think so? I think most people draw a distinction between the two. For instance, they recognize there's a difference between the leftist who believes we should be wary of pesticides and the effects they could have on the environment and the SJW that wants to ban DDT in order to ensure more people die of insect borne diseases. I talk to conservatives more than progressives. Well, you may at least talk at more conservatives than 'progressives'. I don't … | /r/MensRights | 23/08/18 05:07 PM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseNope didn't even read OP... Ah, you're one of those people. Well you should take some time out from 'correcting' people and have a listen. You'll learn more useful stuff than from your 'progressive' echo chambers. I have no idea what OPs usage even was... Really? something comparable to 'SJW'... I see, so you do have an idea what it means. The one you stated is incorrect, but given that 'SJW' is in the same ballpark (SJWs are often cultural Marxists but it's not a requirement) I've no doubt that… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/18 11:50 AM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseAs I said in one of my first replies to you, when you read the term Cultural Marxism as typed by OP you knew what it meant as well as I did. You even claimed Breitbart was the source. The fact that OP wrote it and you understood it is proof enough that it's a valid definition. You didn't mistake it for the definition in the Frankfurt School's critique, the one by the Birmingham School, or the one by E.P. Thompson. OP successfully communicated what they meant because you, despite your protestatio… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/18 05:06 AM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseCan't help but notice that nowhere in your rambling nonsensical statement did you justify your opinion that the only valid definitions of Cultural Marxism are the ones you approve of. I know it's hard to remember after all your attempts to distract but that's what started this whole comment chain. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/18 05:10 PM |
| 0 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseJust name calling? Not going to list any benefits postmodernism or Marxist has brought to society? Yeah, didn't think so. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/18 01:56 PM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseYou're just mad that neither postmodernism nor Marxism has actually benefited society so you lash out. I understand, it's probably hard to have someone point out exactly how useless your cherished ideology is. If you're lucky it'll get easier with all the practice you'll get throughout your life. If you're unlucky, society will fully adopt cultural Marxism and you'll have to live through the resulting misery with the shame of knowing you once supported such awfulness. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/18 01:48 AM |
| 0 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the Muse...as if I'm a postmodernist... You're not? Sorry, you were so eager to defend it and so willing to pretend it had something useful to say I didn't realize you were being sarcastic. It's really not scary or communism. No kidding? I never conflated postmodernism with communism. In fact I said that postmodernism was warmed over nihilism once you take the time to wade through the jargon. But you're right, postmodernism by itself isn't scary at all. At worst it'd probably result in a lot of silly pe… | /r/MensRights | 22/08/18 12:18 AM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseJurgen Habermas was from the second generation of The Frankfurt School Then why'd you bring him up as if he mattered and then claim to only be talking about first gen Frankfurt School? I mean I realize your whole shtick is to avoid the fact that you can't refute OP's definition of Cultural Marxism but really, you could at least have some structure to the smoke and mirrors you present instead of a relevant argument. Like I said last time: try using even a single properly sourced (and accurate to … | /r/MensRights | 21/08/18 11:02 PM |
| 0 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseUnfortunately you've based your definition of reification on one line I quoted you from the Wikipedia... You're the one who quoted it as if it justified your argument. Now you're droning on and on as if somehow you nailing down the definition of reification for me (no thanks, I know what it is) will somehow prove you right. I don't know if you missed my point or are just pretending to be obtuse. Nancy Fraser contends, without evidence, that the different outcomes of certain groups are definitely… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/18 07:07 PM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseYeah, reification is a product of language. Of course it occurs. As soon as you describe anything you have reified it into language. Ah there's the old pseudo-scientific babble of post-modernism. So by describing something, I've misconceived a specific human creation as a fact of nature, result of cosmic laws, or a manifestation of divine will? Bullshit. My description has a certain accuracy, it correlates with reality to a certain, possibly measurable, degree. But I in no way confuse my descrip… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/18 04:29 PM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseSo yeah, I think the quote you've chosen is a good proof that she's working against Identity Politics totalitarianism. But she's not, she accepts without proof that reification has occurred and proposes that her way of tackling it be used rather than the current model. Her acceptance of these supposed systemic problems leads her to the same goals by a different route. It's the same grievance industry, with the same actors, doing the same things, only this time with a different way of looking at … | /r/MensRights | 21/08/18 02:13 PM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseNancy Fraser was after a more genuine form of race relations... Not so far as anyone could tell. Her problem with the Identity Politics model was that she felt that by seeking recognition the movement was sabotaging it's push for redistribution. From the source you linked: I want to argue here that we need a way of rethinking the politics of recognition in a way that can help to solve, or at least mitigate, the problems of displacement and reification. This means conceptualizing struggles for re… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/18 06:12 AM |
| 1 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseNancy Fraser's critique of the Identity Politics model consists of advocating for a different approach to realizing the principles of Identity Politics. It's not a critique of the core values of Identity Politics, those she fully embraces. The same can be said of her criticisms of feminism. It's not that she thinks feminism is, at its core, incorrect. She believes feminism's goals can be accomplished using a different approach. Jurgen Habermas is a post-modernist. His critiques amount to no more… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/18 09:02 PM |
| 3 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseThey should, but they don't under post-modern 'science'. And since post-modern 'science' is now widely acknowledged as legitimate, all science is called into question. But none of this changes the fact that the definition of Cultural Marxism, in this context, is not what you claim it is. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/18 05:17 PM |
| 3 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseIn a world where Feminist Glaciology is supposedly a legitimate scientific endeavor you'll have to forgive me for not assuming that what Brietbart says is wrong and whatever post-modernist drivel you support is correct. When the supposed academic elite are putting out nonsense any assumption of what it means to be 'well researched' should be tossed aside. Since we all understand what is meant by the term Cultural Marxism in this context that is the correct definition. | /r/MensRights | 20/08/18 05:01 PM |
| 2 | Mideval History Professor Targeted for Exposing History of Women's Liberation Through White Men, and the Archetype of the MuseWow, what a long-winded way to say 'I reject your definition of Cultural Marxism and substitute my own'. No one outside of the bubble of post-modernism really cares how you guys define it. Everyone outside of that bubble defines it as the Marxist concept of oppressor-class vs. oppressed-class translated from the sphere of economics over into identity and married to post-modernism in an unholy union to form what is broadly known as Identity Politics. The vast majority of the readers here (includi… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/18 04:27 PM |
| 0 | British School Boys Must Now Wear ‘Gender-Neutral’ SkirtsWow, your reading comprehension sucks. Incorrect statement: The school banned the boys from wearing shorts so in attempt to prove a point the boys wore skirts. Statement correcting misinformation (bolding added): Following the change, parent Alastair Vince-Porteous asked staff if his son could wear tailored shorts... The change being the ban on shorts (even tailored shorts) and the authorization of "gender neutral" skirts. The school fully expected the boys to wear skirts for comfort, it wasn't … | /r/MensRights | 17/06/18 05:32 PM |
| 2 | [updated and expanded] The Gynocentrism of Jordan Peterson< ...the article explores Jung's idea of a variety of female archetypes... It does nothing of the sort. There's no exploration of Jung's ideas. The author doesn't discuss the validity of Jung, or the pro/cons of his world view, they simply criticize JP for valuing motherhood above the other archetypes. The article is a critique calling out JP for daring to make a value judgement in violation of post-modern principles. i.e. It's post-modernist screeching. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/18 09:39 PM |
| 1 | [updated and expanded] The Gynocentrism of Jordan PetersonAnd post-modernists throw around the word 'reactionary' in an attempt to appear progressive. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/18 08:40 PM |
| 1 | [updated and expanded] The Gynocentrism of Jordan PetersonWhat exactly is the post-modern interpretation of womanhood? There is no objective truth to it. Womanhood isn't a term used to define the actions and characteristics associated with adult females, it's whatever you believe it to be. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/18 08:19 PM |
| 3 | [updated and expanded] The Gynocentrism of Jordan PetersonEvery time I read one of these 'takedowns' of Jordan Peterson I inevitably find that it's just more post-modernist screeching. This article isn't about gynocentrism, the author's main complaint is that JP doesn't value the post-modernist interpretation of womanhood. This is best demonstrated by a line from the article itself. By relativizing the Mother Archetype, by removing that word “Great” that appears before it, we allow it to be just one archetype among many, no more or less important than … | /r/MensRights | 25/02/18 03:15 PM |
| 5 | Woman stabs boyfriend attempting to kill him. But she walks away free, because any sentence "would damage her career"What indicates she's generally violent as opposed to specifically violent in that situation? According to witnesses at the school, she assaulted another female student when she saw her talking to one of her ex-boyfriends. The student then asked the school to move to a different dorm for fear of reprisal. She claimed to a prior boyfriend that she had cancer in order to explain the side effects of her cocaine addiction. When he discovered the truth and confronted her she choked him unconscious. He… | /r/PussyPass | 04/09/17 05:16 AM |
| 1 | Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA EvidenceAre you fucking kidding me of course by a judge that's the whole fucking point. That's my point. A judge and a DA, not an impartial jury to look at the evidence. Two politicians with DNA that confirmed what was already known (one of the assailants hadn't been caught), and the word of a serial rapist/murderer that he acted alone. Wow! How convincing! | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 04:45 AM |
| 1 | Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA Evidence...why didn't any of their confessions name Reyes, or even acknowledge another person being there? Antron McCray said that a "Puerto Rican kid with a hoodie" was the one that actually penetrated the jogger. But I'm sure you already knew that, being so knowledgeable about the case and all. DNA evidence confirmed Reyes was there and evidence was consistent with his account. Yes, the police already knew there was at least one other assailant on the loose. We only have Reyes' statement that he was a… | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 04:32 AM |
| 2 | Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA EvidenceYou're saying they're guilty EVEN AFTER being found innocent by a court of law. By a judge. It was a political move that had nothing to do with justice. Neither the DNA nor the statements by Reyes are exculpatory. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 02:43 AM |
| -2 | Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA EvidenceReyes confessed to acting alone... What's the word of a serial rapist/murderer worth, especially after he gets caught and sees a way to stick it to the cops one last time? ...which raises the possibility the Central Park Five were coerced into confessing to something they had nothing to do with. With the exception of one, who lied about his age, they were all questioned in the presence of a parent or guardian, their confessions were video taped. Not really a lot of room there for coercion. Cops … | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 02:36 AM |
| 1 | Donald Trump Says Central Park Five Are Guilty, Despite DNA Evidence...despite being officially exonerated by DNA evidence decades after a notorious 1989 rape case. The DNA evidence didn't exonerate them. It was always known that there was no evidence that any of the 5 penetrated the victim, and what DNA evidence there was matched none of them. However, all 5 either admitted to assisting the person who penetrated her (who we now know to be Matias Reyes), or were implicated by the others. The story that emerged was that all 5 had a hand in beating her and holding… | /r/MensRights | 07/10/16 11:13 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone have info on The Red Pill actually came to be? I'm struggling to find an origin story which isn't biased as fuckSpeaking of dodging the question... | /r/MensRights | 15/09/16 03:24 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone have info on The Red Pill actually came to be? I'm struggling to find an origin story which isn't biased as fuckWhat is there to be unaware of? It's 'meaning' was lifted directly from The Matrix, which in turn got it from philosophers and the like before them. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 08:37 AM |
| 3 | Does anyone have info on The Red Pill actually came to be? I'm struggling to find an origin story which isn't biased as fuckYou seem to be asking for an origin for something that doesn't have one particular origin. The ideas presented on this board, TRP and other manosphere sources are not new, they've been around for a long time. The internet manosphere is just a new way of having the same sorts of discussions men have always had. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/16 12:32 AM |
| 2 | Western society adopted male circumcision from a foreign religion as a standard procedure for male babies. Why are women making a fuss over a similar procedure adopted from another foreign religion from the same geographic area? Hypocrisy?John Harvey Kellogg is the man I'm talking about. He started a cereal company with his brother peddling the corn flakes he invented. After a disagreement, his brother (allegedly) stole the formula and started his own company that became the Kellogg Company. | /r/MensRights | 29/08/16 05:27 AM |
| 3 | Western society adopted male circumcision from a foreign religion as a standard procedure for male babies. Why are women making a fuss over a similar procedure adopted from another foreign religion from the same geographic area? Hypocrisy?Western society didn't adopt male circumcision from any specific religion. Male circumcision was adopted because it was promoted as a way to prevent masturbation by dulling sexual pleasure. Check out Kellogg's (yes, the guy who started the cereal company) and Graham's (of cracker fame) writings on the subject. Both believed that masturbation was dangerous for a person's physical/mental/spiritual health and promoted circumcision as a preventative. It was because of them, and people like them, tha… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/16 09:38 AM |
| 3 | Unexpected consequence of NOT circumcising my sonIf it is attached, how would a circumcision be possible in the first place? They essentially skin the glans and remove the outer layers that make up the foreskin (or will become the foreskin depending on how you look at it), that's why it's a bloody mess afterward. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/16 06:41 AM |
| 1 | Unexpected consequence of NOT circumcising my sonYour dick isn't weird, you were probably just one of the very few who developed retractable foreskin early. At age 6-7 something like 70% of boys still have attached foreskins. If yours detached early it just means you fell into the 30%. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/16 11:13 PM |
| 8 | Unexpected consequence of NOT circumcising my sonAt that age, cleaning an uncircumcised penis is the same as cleaning a circumcised one. Unless something has gone very wrong, the foreskin is still attached to the glans, there's no extra parts to clean. Only around puberty should the foreskin detach. Until then, cleaning it is as simple as cleaning your finger. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/16 05:34 PM |
| 2 | Just told I was being required to come to court for a 0 dollar balance for child supportFar as I know I'm supposed to be in court Friday in Cookeville tn but they said they were fixing that now they say I have to be there August 5th in Livingston TN but that's not the date they served or location they served me to attend court at. Sounds like a trap to cite you for 'failure to appear'. You should confirm with the court when and where you need to show. Don't depend on the word of child support services. | /r/MensRights | 13/07/16 05:14 PM |
| 1 | Donald Trump supports the death penalty for men found innocent of rapeI thought you said you looked into the case? I did. The DNA proves that Reyes penetrated the victim, it says nothing at all about whether or not the five boys helped him commit the rape. The cops held the kids and badgered them into confessions. So you're saying the kids were coached to lie to the cops, but they wouldn't do it so the cops badgered them into it? What a weird and twisted world you must live in. Try reading further next time. Again, your quote is about a person who made a false acc… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/16 05:37 PM |
| 1 | Donald Trump supports the death penalty for men found innocent of rape...the exoneration was based on DNA matches. I wasn't aware that DNA matches could definitively exclude them from having held her down, fondled her, and/or beat her while she was being penetrated by Matias Reyes. In fact I've never heard of any such magical DNA tests and I doubt you have either. But just for shits and giggles, how did the DNA tests definitively prove that they didn't do what they said they did? ...you know nothing about the extent cops will go to in order to fabricate evidence: … | /r/MensRights | 08/06/16 10:37 AM |
| 1 | Fallout: Vaults 68 and 69Just curios, when you said "This is a damp squid" did you mean "This is a damp squib? And if not, what does the expression "This is a damp squid" mean? | /r/MensRights | 06/06/16 11:52 PM |
| 1 | Donald Trump supports the death penalty for men found innocent of rapeYou didn't really look into the case did you? The real perp came forward. The word of a serial rapist and murderer means nothing to me. He was already serving a life sentence and in any case, the statute of limitations had run out. He had nothing to lose by claiming he acted alone and by doing so he could help out some fellow criminals. They were sleep deprived and denied legal counsel... I can imagine the conversation now... A: Hey Lou, I want you to do what it takes to get a confession from th… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/16 08:39 PM |
| 1 | Donald Trump supports the death penalty for men found innocent of rapeBut they were guilty. Three of them confessed after being questioned in the presence of their parents/legal guardians. They also implicated the two other defendants. All three admitted to holding her down/beating her while a "Puerto Rican" guy (their words) penetrated her. Just because some activist judge decided to throw out the verdict doesn't mean they weren't guilty. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/16 10:19 AM |
| 2 | Was any of the pay gap ever based off of discrimination?The arguments presented in the video are essentially the same arguments used today. When you cut out confounding variables you find that the gender wage gap disappears and in some cases reverses. For example, Thomas Sowell points out that women who have never married make slightly more than men who have never married. The same holds true today. All the evidence points to the fact that there is not now, nor has there ever been, a gender pay gap based in discrimination against women. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 10:18 PM |
| 2 | Was any of the pay gap ever based off of discrimination?Circular argument. Assumption: Gender discrimination caused the pay gap in the past. Any evidence against this assumption is false Since the same 'false' evidence is used today to refute gender discrimination as the cause of the pay gap, gender discrimination is true. Because gender discrimination is true any evidence against it can safely be discarded. And 'round and 'round it goes. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/16 09:39 PM |
| 2 | Did I just get set up by my wife?Never talk to the cops. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/16 03:38 AM |
| 2 | I'm a high school student wrongfully accused of rape, what do I do?Well yeah. If you deny something and it can be proven you lied it's going to look bad. But apart from any other info the cops might have, you can give them evidence simply by denying something. Cop: She told us you raped her so badly that she was bleeding from her groin. OP: No way! She was perfectly fine! Cop: So you're saying her groin wasn't bleeding when you saw it? In this example OP would be admitting that he saw her groin because obviously, he couldn't deny it was bleeding without seeing … | /r/MensRights | 08/04/16 09:58 AM |
| 4 | I'm a high school student wrongfully accused of rape, what do I do?It's not just about denying the sex. Denying anything gives information to the potential prosecution and makes your lawyer's job harder. He doesn't have to deny that the sex occurred, the potential prosecution has to prove that the sex occurred. From what we know, what does the prosecution have? They have two witnesses that can verify that OP and a girl went into a room together and sometime later came out of that room. The girl claims that she was raped while in that room. With just this, can t… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 08:58 PM |
| 31 | I'm a high school student wrongfully accused of rape, what do I do?Shut up. Don't admit anything, don't deny anything. Before rape charges can be brought, they have to prove that some sort of sexual contact occurred. By 'telling your story' you'll have cleared that first hurdle for them. At that point all they need to do is 'prove' that the sex you admitted to was without consent. This is likely to be a very hard thing to do. If your parents become involved they may pressure you to tell your side. You may be punished by the school and/or your parents. Regardles… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/16 08:06 PM |
| 44 | Kesha must honor Sony contract with Dr. Luke despite claims of date rape because no New York laws were broken, judge rulesHow is this not PPD? She thought the pussy pass would be enough to let her go into court and slander someone in order to get out of a contract. It wasn't. Pure PPD through and through. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/04/16 12:35 AM |
| 1 | Men are more socially isolated than women. Please sign this petition to teach empathy in schools to help the socially isolated males of the future live in a more comfortable environment!What guarantees do you have that the proposed program isn't going to be run by the same type of people who are screwing up the boys now? I can think of several ways such a program could be harmful by having the wrong people administer it and personally, I believe the wrong people would be in charge. From what I'm reading, they're aiming to start a new program to 'educate' students under the existing social justice dogma. Is the current state of social justice in education something we want to ex… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/16 09:51 PM |
| 2 | OBSERVATION : Gay men have fought hard for the right to get married and won. With MRA fighting on our side, it looks like women will have the right to kill us in our sleep or while we are watching TV.....if they feel 'afraid'...You're still at it?! What a loser. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/16 07:23 PM |
| 8 | Die lying girl, die... Now feminism defends the defamatory father of a rape fantasist. Finally women who accuse men of rape are getting there reward...Good lord, you're not going to catch any fish with bait this bad. Zero day account, invective against women, already tried trolling the board at least 6 times already, misspellings, etc. You're a bad troll, up your game! | /r/MensRights | 31/03/16 05:34 PM |
| 3 | Why are feminists and MRAs almost always at odds with each other?Feminists hate the MRA movement because if their proposed policies go through it would necessitate a reduction in female privilege. MRAs hate feminism because they not only stand in the way of helping men, they're often the cause of male suffering. | /r/MensRights | 24/03/16 05:11 AM |
| 0 | Are Family Courts a Violation of the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution?As most divorces and child support cases involve more than $20, would this mean that any of the litigants in such cases could invoke their right to a jury trial? No. Anyone who applies for a marriage license from the state agrees to abide by the state's rules regarding that marriage including how a divorce is going to be handled. For child support cases that don't involve a marriage, there's rules in the Social Security laws that apply. By participating in the Social Security system you have agr… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/16 02:55 PM |
| 2 | The actions of moderate or "true" feminists, not of radicals or crazies, are what put people off of feminism.Feminism is a religion based on the Lovecraftian mythology of the evil Great Old Ones. The all-powerful Great Old Ones (men) oppress and subjugate helpless humans (women) by using their divine power (patriarchy). The only thing that can harm a Great Old One is the power of another Great Old One (patriarchy backfiring). The sole hope of humanity (women) lies in prayer to the Great Old Ones (blog/tweet/protest/etc.) in the hopes of convincing some of them to repent their evil ways and oppose the r… | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 10:00 PM |
| 1 | One out of five women don't have kids by 45 (up from 1/9 in 1940s) partially due to female hypergamy: "IT'S THE MAN'S FAULT"You can't guess the incidence of a tax... Sure you can. In the U.S. all taxes (with a few exceptions) are felt at the cash register because taxes are a cost for business. Just like the cost of hiring personnel, just like the cost of raw materials, just like the cost of infrastructure, etc. etc. Costs get passed down to the consumer regardless of the source. The effects of raising taxes are no different from raising the cost of raw materials, it's not some mysterious issue that requires deep anal… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/11/15 07:05 PM |
| 1 | One out of five women don't have kids by 45 (up from 1/9 in 1940s) partially due to female hypergamy: "IT'S THE MAN'S FAULT"In economics, the "real wage" is defined as R = W/P, ie. the real wage is the nominal wage divided by the price level. I see. So economists define 'real wage' in a way that includes the price of goods and then pretend that tax increases aren't passed on to the consumer but are instead impacting wages. This is ideological nonsense designed to shift the perceived impact of taxes. Higher taxes result in higher prices of goods. The point at which the taxes are paid is when the goods are purchased (w… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/11/15 04:32 PM |
| 2 | One out of five women don't have kids by 45 (up from 1/9 in 1940s) partially due to female hypergamy: "IT'S THE MAN'S FAULT"...they're passed on through lower wages, not higher prices. When the tax on the sale of gasoline increases so do the prices, the workers' wages don't go down. If you've got a landline phone and an itemized bill they even list all the taxes that they've been charged and are now passing onto you. Taxes are passed on to the consumer. ...why these companies that supposedly control the government want to keep corporate income tax in the first place ("it gets passed on" isn't very satisfying when you… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/11/15 02:41 AM |
| 8 | One out of five women don't have kids by 45 (up from 1/9 in 1940s) partially due to female hypergamy: "IT'S THE MAN'S FAULT"Because corporations don't pay taxes, they pass the cost on to their consumers. Business taxes don't come out of a business' profits. In anticipation of the question "Why do corporations work so hard to avoid taxes then?"... Because by avoiding taxes they can charge less than their competition and gain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/11/15 12:58 PM |
| 3 | Hard proof there is no wage gap?The problem is in quantifying the effects of certain behavior differences between the genders. Even the four to six percent is little better than an educated guess. As the gender wage gap report for the Department of Labor puts it: (pdf) As a result, it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensate women and men differently on socially acceptable bases, and hence … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/15 07:17 PM |
| 1 | "Former Reddit CEO explains "what the racist-sexist neckbeards don't understand""Then by your definition, yes, they are gaming the system rather than attempting to change it. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/15 03:44 AM |
| 1 | "Former Reddit CEO explains "what the racist-sexist neckbeards don't understand""I guess it depends on your definition of gaming. Personally, I think the term gaming has a component of deception in it and I'd be uncomfortable describing them, as a group, as deceptive. I would say they attempt to discover the underpinnings of society, why people do what they do, and work within that framework to improve their own lives. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/15 03:15 AM |
| 1 | "Former Reddit CEO explains "what the racist-sexist neckbeards don't understand""While most will acknowledge MRA complaints in regards to society's treatment of men they don't believe that the MRM has a chance to succeed. Essentially the MRM is viewed as an exercise in futility. The MRM believes (or appears to believe) that male issues can be addressed with logic, reason, and education. Win the hearts and minds of people, show them the issues that men have and once a critical mass is reached, steps can be taken to correct current imbalances. Red-pillers seem to believe that … | /r/MensRights | 17/07/15 02:55 AM |
| 2 | "Former Reddit CEO explains "what the racist-sexist neckbeards don't understand""I doubt it. First, there's already a fallback forum in place. Second, many red-pillers don't agree with MRA positions and won't post here anyway. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/15 04:48 PM |
| 14 | Gender Equality: Punch for a PunchIt looks like she attempts to body-block him from getting to the bar by shifting her hips/leg to the left. At around 10 seconds in, look at his hand/arm as he grabs the bar. Her hip/leg moves into view against his arm and you can see her dip a bit as she extends her leg to the left. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/07/15 12:38 PM |
| 1 | ELI5: I'm seeing this term "tradcon" being used a lot. I noticed that some MRAs are getting flack over it. I can't really find a reference for it. I noticed that GWW and AVFM have been given various labels regarding this. Can somebody explain it to me?liberal/progressive Of course the 'liberal' part is a lie. Progressives are as authoritarian as conservatives just in a different way. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/15 08:23 PM |
| 2 | Why this sub needs to stop bashing feminismThe first reason why /r/MensRights needs to stop bashing feminism is because moderate feminists actually agree with you on a lot of issues, and aren't welcomed by this sub because of the constant posts about how terrible feminism is. I agree. Feminists, as a group, are far too weak to handle any criticism. Some might call your viewpoint misogynistic for calling a group of mainly women weak but IMO you shouldn't be criticized for pointing out the truth. Secondly, a lot of people on this sub seem … | /r/MensRights | 28/06/15 07:56 PM |
| 4 | I am a feminist. AMA, and I'll ask you something in return. Yes, I know what I'm doing./u/zulu127 Gave a good reply to someone else. Check out Queen of Peace Shelter, they only accept boys under 5! | /r/MensRights | 27/06/15 12:44 PM |
| 3 | I am a feminist. AMA, and I'll ask you something in return. Yes, I know what I'm doing.Queen of Peace Shelter Girls o.k. Boys under 5 years old. Disgusting | /r/MensRights | 27/06/15 12:38 PM |
| 1 | Dear Moderate MRAs: You Shouldn't Exist EitherThe disagreement we're having is a definitional one. When I use the term moderate feminist I'm referencing the group of people who claim to be feminists that truly believe in gender equality. They may, or may not see through the radical's lies. They may, or may not promote actual equality but they all believe in it. The discussion isn't about how many moderates exist. It's not about whether the actions of the radicals benefit the moderates. It's about whether or not the moderate ideology has any… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/15 03:06 PM |
| 1 | Dear Moderate MRAs: You Shouldn't Exist EitherIt doesn't matter who did it, moderates or radicals. They got what they wanted anyways. Feminism is an ideology, feminists are those who subscribe to that ideology. Any truly moderate feminist who really believes in gender equality will not get what they want (equality) through the action of radicals (supremacists). The cause of moderate feminism is therefore set back by the actions of radicals. Yes, the women who are part of the moderate movement still benefit from the actions of the radicals b… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/15 02:22 PM |
| 1 | Dear Moderate MRAs: You Shouldn't Exist EitherThey may not be universally liked, but they've never had it so good. Who cares if they're well liked? It hasn't made them successful, they're still politically dead. The only success moderate feminists have had is when the radicals pushed through laws that accidentally resulted in more equality. And the only laws I can think of that fit that category are the mandatory arrest laws (which had their equality stripped once the Duluth model was introduced). That's the whole point of the post you link… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/15 05:41 AM |
| 1 | Dear Moderate MRAs: You Shouldn't Exist EitherModerate feminism is much worse off even though individual feminists profit. The ideology hasn't had any successes since it began. Women (there are some deluded males) among moderate feminists are riding the wave of radical legislation towards gender supremacy whether they like it or not. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/15 02:27 AM |
| 2 | Dear Moderate MRAs: You Shouldn't Exist EitherYou're right. Neither moderate nor radical MRAs exist in any sort of politically meaningful sense. There have been a few small successes but overall MRAs haven't accomplished much. Still, moderate feminism is much worse off than the MRM. Either they're supporting radical feminist policy (so not truly moderate at all) or they're fighting the ghosts of sexism set up for them by the radicals (1 in 4, wage gap, the MRM, etc). While they're busy over in a corner shadowboxing non-issues, the radical f… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/15 02:15 PM |
| 6 | [Serious] Some genuine questionsYour girlfriend is laboring under the mistaken notion that The Patriarchy™ (as described by feminist ideology) exists, it doesn't. As long as she believes in this point of faith you will never be able to convince her of the truth. Feminism is a religion and the root of it is faith in The Patriarchy™. There is no evidence it exists, it must be accepted on faith. If you believe in The Patriarchy™ suddenly everything can be explained by it, it becomes a "get out of logic free" card. Q: Why do women… | /r/MensRights | 27/05/15 02:50 PM |
| 2 | You guys want to know how the make "rape" studies?Sticks and stones and all that shit. You're applying your own standards to everyone else. You're saying 'No one could ever criticize me enough to make me have sex with them, therefore it's impossible for such a thing to occur.' In reality, psychological phenomena such as Stockholm Syndrome exist. Once you recognize that people's psyches can be manipulated in such a manner it becomes a question of 'What level of mental abuse constitutes criminal behavior?'. The question posed in the survey makes … | /r/MensRights | 16/04/15 04:14 PM |
| 2 | You guys want to know how the make "rape" studies?...don't you think that could cause some emotional distress? Sure, but that doesn't make the actions of the person threatening to leave the relationship criminal in nature. You're essentially arguing that freedom of association does not exist where sex is concerned. According to you, people are free to not engage in sex, but if someone requires sex in order to continue the relationship they must either end the relationship without explanation or explain their requirement and become a rapist if t… | /r/MensRights | 16/04/15 01:36 AM |
| 2 | You guys want to know how the make "rape" studies?Threatening to spread rumors about someone or criticizing someone unless they have sex with you count as rape because they both threaten (or do) harm to someone to coerce them into having sex. As an example, suppose someone threatens to spread the rumor that you're a pedo unless you have sex with them (and you believe them to be capable of such a thing). Being believed to be a child molester can have very harmful consequences. You might get harassed by the police, fired from your job, lose your … | /r/MensRights | 15/04/15 11:05 PM |
| 1 | You guys want to know how the make "rape" studies?Threatening to end the relationship is coercive on the same level that having to actually pay for things at the store is coercive. Technically it fits one of the definitions of 'coerce' (to compel to an act or choice) but there's no element of force and thus doesn't remove consent. Verbally pressuring someone to have sex also does not remove consent. The other person is free to say no. If the question were asking about illegally harassing someone with the intent to make them have sex then you mi… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/15 10:47 PM |
| 1 | You guys want to know how the make "rape" studies?I like how they mix answers that don't indicate rape with answers that are rape. a. telling lies (not rape), threatening to end the relationship (not rape), threatening to spread rumors about them (deceptive), making promises about the future I knew were untrue (not rape), or continually verbally pressuring them after they said they didn't want to (deceptive) b. showing displeasure (not rape), criticizing their sexuality or attractiveness (deceptive), getting angry but not using physical force a… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/15 02:10 PM |
| 0 | Is there a subreddit where men and women can come together to discuss equal rights for ALL humans?The Good Men Project featuring David Futrelle? Author of such insightful articles as "Dismantling the Men's Rights Movement"? Yeah, when I think of gender egalitarianism ol' David 'Man Boobz' Futrelle's picture pops into my head. /s | /r/MensRights | 24/03/15 12:37 AM |
| 1 | Penn Law students respond to faculty letter, claiming it perpetuates "pervasive bias against women that Title IX was enacted to address"Due process is only mandated by law for criminal cases. --/u/Karissa36, person with a law degree-- LOL | /r/MensRights | 27/02/15 08:23 AM |
| 1 | Penn Law students respond to faculty letter, claiming it perpetuates "pervasive bias against women that Title IX was enacted to address"You believe that there's no due process involved in civil cases? There's no such thing as civil courts or procedures that must be followed before a verdict is rendered? There's no way anyone could look up the laws regulating civil procedures? Pardon me if I doubt your word on that law degree. I mean, I'm on the internet. If I didn't know the answer already I could go to one of the many search engines available and type in the words "civil due process", hit search, and browse the many websites th… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/15 11:22 PM |
| 1 | Penn Law students respond to faculty letter, claiming it perpetuates "pervasive bias against women that Title IX was enacted to address"5th amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America: ...nor shall any person...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law... 14th amendment: ...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law... Notice there's no stipulation limiting due process to only criminal cases. Before making such a bold assertion I would have expected that you would have at least looked up the term "due process". And with that, I'm … | /r/MensRights | 26/02/15 03:11 PM |
| 1 | Penn Law students respond to faculty letter, claiming it perpetuates "pervasive bias against women that Title IX was enacted to address"Throughout your post you're equating 'being required to do' with 'being hired to do' and they're two completely different things. The government may require organizations to abide by certain laws (e.g. food safety laws) in order to license or incorporate them. These requirements apply to all and are non-optional. The government has told the organizations what must be done to comply with the law. Just as the government hires individuals to perform governmental functions (e.g. police, judges, etc)… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/15 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Penn Law students respond to faculty letter, claiming it perpetuates "pervasive bias against women that Title IX was enacted to address"The colleges have not been "hired" to perform any government function for the federal government. The government can only legally do what the government is constitutionally allowed to do. In the case of colleges, colleges are paid a certain amount of money, that payment is contingent upon them adjudicating sexual assault cases, thus they are agents of the government hired to adjudicate. Legally they loan consciousness and physical capacity to the governmental corporation (i.e. they "become" the … | /r/MensRights | 25/02/15 08:33 PM |
| 1 | Penn Law students respond to faculty letter, claiming it perpetuates "pervasive bias against women that Title IX was enacted to address"The colleges are not conducting criminal trials and there are no criminal penalties, so the massive level of due process protections for people charged with crimes is not automatically applicable. The government has courts to enforce contracts (civil) and to address a wrong done to an individual (criminal). If colleges were hired to adjudicate in matters of alleged harm to individuals that means it's a criminal court. A criminal court can only hand down criminal penalties. In college courts thes… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/15 06:39 PM |
| 2 | Penn Law students respond to faculty letter, claiming it perpetuates "pervasive bias against women that Title IX was enacted to address"She has no point. College is optional which places it firmly within private law which means colleges need only provide the minimum amount of due process mandated by law. The trouble with Title IX is that it doesn't mandate a minimum amount of due process, it mandates a maximum amount of due process and does this for a criminal offense normally entitled to a much higher standard. A parallel here would be the government mandating shock therapy for all prisoners held in private prisons. Just becaus… | /r/MensRights | 25/02/15 03:04 PM |
| 1 | Why are older men looking at women half their age?A requirement for attraction is a minimum acceptable standard to meet, a preference is a characteristic that is not a requirement but is something you desire. For example, you might not be attracted to women over a certain weight/height ratio, they don't meet your requirement for attraction. You might prefer blondes, but you still find women with other hair colors to be attractive. EDIT: Just to be clear, bikini models are a preference for most men not a requirement which is why women who are no… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 11:48 PM |
| 2 | Why are older men looking at women half their age?Being poor/rich is an indicator of achievement and therefore an indirect measure of personality, skill, motivation, etc. These are not physical traits and thus (in her mind) it's fine to select for them. A male who's attraction is based on how wrinkled her skin is, how short her hair is, or how much she weighs is, of course, shallow. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 10:30 PM |
| 0 | Why are older men looking at women half their age?So she's not exactly ignoring physical traits. No she's not, but for many women physical traits are preferences rather than requirements for attraction. Sure she'd like to have everything in one package but she'd probably be attracted to a charming, experienced, short man. Just not quite as much as if he were tall. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 09:55 PM |
| 21 | Why are older men looking at women half their age?It's not even hypocrisy on her part, she just cannot conceive of someone having criteria for attraction that are different from her own. She's attracted to men older than her, she doesn't mind a little heft on a man, she values experience, she likes a man with a career, etc. and she assumes her own model of attraction applies to men as well. I can't even be mad at her for it. She's been told her whole life that the female model of attraction is the only moral model. If she assumes that men are m… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 04:46 PM |
| 4 | The Young Turks have FINALLY progressed on the topic of circumcision.You're not a very good negative karma troll. You're only at -65 at the time of this post. You'll have to act much more offensive if you want that sweet -karma. If you really want to boost your score, hang out at ShitRedditSays and find a juicy topic there. Go to the "offensive" comment and write a reply agreeing with them. SRS will downvote you into oblivion in no time. The trick is to get your phrasing just right so you're not upvoted by the sane redditors which will, of course, hurt your score… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 01:39 PM |
| 3 | Why are so many young men inured to violence?Levels of violent crime have gone down in the UK in recent years, with the telling exceptions of sexual and domestic offences. Lies. Violent crime, including sexual and domestic offenses, has decreased. Just because 'being looked at by an unattractive male in a manner I find offensive' and 'being physically prevented from stabbing my boyfriend' have been added to the list of sexual and DV offenses doesn't mean that violence in those areas hasn't decreased. It has, ideologues have simply added mo… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 01:27 PM |
| 39 | Why are older men looking at women half their age?Another fat, short-haired, older woman jealous of the attention attractive young women receive. How original of her to write an article attempting to lay the responsibility for her jealousy at the feet of men. Her question "...should I be prepared to change?" is practically tautological. To become attractive to men, she's going to have to change to become attractive to men. The same holds true for men. If a man isn't attractive to women (and he wants to be) he'll have to change to become attract… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 01:08 PM |
| 2 | Worth Engaging?Yep here it is. It's at the end at the #1 spot. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/15 12:59 AM |
| 10 | Feminist writers are so besieged by online abuse that some have begun to retire. Hurrah!(Yeah, there are different definitions of where harassment begins, here we speak about doxxing, rape and death threats.) There really aren't different definitions though. Harassment is simply being repeatedly attacked. There's illegitimate harassment like rape or death threats that are classified as assault, and there's legitimate harassment that is otherwise known as criticism. By lumping the two together this article attempts to make criticism as evil as assault/abuse in the mind of the reader… | /r/MensRights | 21/02/15 03:10 PM |
| 6 | Would you say you are opposed to all feminism?When people talk about hating feminism what they usually mean is politically active feminism. With politically active feminism we get the Duluth model of DV, the destruction of due process, the monopolization of public resources for women, the gender wage gap lie, the deliberate ignoring/minimization of problems effecting men etc. Where an issue isn't inherently horrible (like decreasing rape, who doesn't support that?) feminist solutions are abominable (e.g. destroying due process). While there… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/15 02:13 PM |
| 3 | Tumblr Strikes Again *sigh*Good Guy Soren warning everyone about how deeply delusional the Cracked staff is. His whole 'the ends justify the means' response is just nausea inducing. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/15 07:00 PM |
| 2 | Our great nemesis Amanda does it again, digs up some cutting edge research from 1966 to support her fresh outlook on gender bias..Dammm Foiled Again!!These findings are so remarkable that I quite simply don't believe them. Math is objective. The answers are either right or wrong, there is no "sort of right" in math. Assuming that the language in the article is the same as that used in the study, let's contrast this statement (my emphasis): In math, the girls outscored the boys in the exam graded anonymously, but the boys outscored the girls when graded by teachers who knew their names. With this one: The researchers concluded that in math and… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/15 11:28 AM |
| 1 | Man jailed for sending private emails that referred to women as "slut" and "moll". Because apparently Australia's allergy to "offensive" conduct now covers private conversations.The article doesn't state specifically what the sentence was for, but since calling women sluts etc. in private emails is not illegal, it would seem that it was not this. It says right in the article (my emphasis) "Fredrickson had pleaded guilty to three charges of using a carriage service in a "menacing, harassing or offensive" manner." In other words, he was sentenced for privately distributing content that the supposed victims were never meant to see. If the offended parties never saw it, the… | /r/MensRights | 09/02/15 09:58 AM |
| 7 | Feminists say the dictionary definition of feminism is wrong.Every milestone of the creation of the English dictionary was achieved by (yup) a white guy – To think that a country full of Anglo-Saxons would have their dictionaries created by a white guy! What were these disgusting whities thinking? Did they think no one would notice?! Thank the goddess this author points out their rampant racism/sexism/homophobia/transphobia/ableism!!!!! | /r/MensRights | 27/01/15 06:16 PM |
| 1 | Explanations about the French law on paternityIf your interpretation of the law is correct it sounds like an easy way to make a change is to popularize contesting paternity in all cases. If the courts are flooded with paternity cases from husbands that suspect infidelity as well as those that don't, I'd wager the rule against getting a paternity test by yourself would go away. Certainly if I were a French man who was about to marry I'd let my soon-to-be wife know that I'd be contesting the paternity of every child. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 08:04 PM |
| 1 | It looks like I've finally said something worth taking out of context.If I knew how to link directly to comments, I would... Underneath each comment on the left you'll see a "permalink" link. That's the link that will take you directly to that specific comment. Simply copy that address into your link like so. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 07:45 PM |
| 1 | This thread and is gross misrepresentation of the MRM is currently being upvoted in r/subredditdrama. If you cant beat em, just use logical fallacies!NEWS FLASH! SRS acts like SRS, find out more on the SRD, AMR, GamerGhazi, etc. subreddits! These people are lost causes, they're not even worth refuting. You will never turn them away from their blind adherence to a broken ideology. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 07:17 PM |
| 7 | New court filings reveal Alan Dershowitz ignored chance to defend against underage rape allegations before they were made public. Affidavit reveals Dershowitz had sex with unnamed victim at least a half-dozen times.A deposition, while it is a legal proceeding does not provide a forum for someone to defend themselves from allegations. The only purpose of this deposition was to gather information to help the cases of these shifty attorneys. Even if Dershowitz is completely innocent and told only the truth, information given at this deposition could be used to hang him in a court of law. It's obvious to everyone but the 'Listen and Believe' SJW crowd (with whom you apparently find common ground) that the only… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 03:19 AM |
| 6 | New court filings reveal Alan Dershowitz ignored chance to defend against underage rape allegations before they were made public. Affidavit reveals Dershowitz had sex with unnamed victim at least a half-dozen times.Here's a better, more accurate title for you OP. New court filings reveal that Alan Dershowitz wisely ignored the chance to be grilled by attorneys who wanted to fish for information to support their case against him. Jane Doe #3 still maintains that Dershowitz raped her. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 02:29 AM |
| 3 | One in three UK female students sexually assaulted or abused on campus. Legal guidance warned that universities and colleges across the UK could be breaking the law by refusing to investigate allegations of indecent assault or rape. THE USA APPROACH HAS COME TO THE UK.A third of female students in Britain have endured a sexual assault or unwanted advances at university... Rule one, be attractive Rule two, don't be unattractive Violations of these rules are equivalent to sexual assault. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/15 03:55 PM |
| 1 | #notallmuslims, in semblance to #notallmen, should be created to show the hypocrisy of media feminists reactionsSo it's taqiyya then? Unfortunately for you, you're lying about things that are well documented in the Qur'an, the hadith, and historical records. Torture and death would have eventually caught up to them in Madina, they had no choice but to take arms and fight for their lives. At the time, torture and death was what awaited bandits, it's not like they were being persecuted unjustly. The battle of Badr (one of the first Muslim victories) started when Mecca got word that Muhammad was planning to … | /r/MensRights | 13/01/15 12:33 AM |
| 1 | #notallmuslims, in semblance to #notallmen, should be created to show the hypocrisy of media feminists reactions...it was addressing the Muslims who fled Mecca to escape torture and death. What this verse was saying is that Muslims will have to stand their ground and fight to defend themselves eventually, instead of all the running and fleeing. It was Muhammad addressing the Muslims who were kicked out of Mecca, at least that part of your statement is true. Of course at that time they weren't being attacked so no 'defensive war' was possible. This statement was said to justify the group's banditry. For th… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/15 01:27 PM |
| 3 | Elastic heart: this video is being condemned as pedophilia. Yeah, there's no demonization of males as sex monsters in this culture, right?I had exactly the same interpretation of this video. I found it very well done. I like the unresolved choice at the end, stay with the "parent" and eventually become trapped by the same cage, or abandon him and go free. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/15 01:55 AM |
| 2 | Elastic heart: this video is being condemned as pedophilia. Yeah, there's no demonization of males as sex monsters in this culture, right?...when you see a comedic picture or video of a woman hitting a man and say "Reverse the genders and this would be seen completely differently.", you're doing the exact same thing that /u/Frittern did... Except that a man and a woman (in the example you used) are widely accepted as functionally identical. Whether the perpetrator/victim of violence is a man or a woman shouldn't change someone's perception of the morality of the act but, for many it does. The discussion then becomes about why the … | /r/MensRights | 12/01/15 01:45 AM |
| 1 | #notallmuslims, in semblance to #notallmen, should be created to show the hypocrisy of media feminists reactionsIt might be argued that some of what I quoted was about a specific war situation, but not all of them. Some of them are definitely about how to treat unbelievers as a general rule, outside of war. For example: "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." - 2:216 When put in context, this verse is Muhammad urging his followers to attack merch… | /r/MensRights | 11/01/15 10:13 PM |
| 4 | Elastic heart: this video is being condemned as pedophilia. Yeah, there's no demonization of males as sex monsters in this culture, right?Replace the child with an adult. While you're fantasizing why not just replace the fight scene that actually occurred with the guy raping the girl? I mean if you're going to start changing the context and then pretending that your newly invented context has anything to do with the original might as well go all the way. You're looking in the mirror and it's reflecting back your own prejudices. You see pedophilia when there is none. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/15 09:38 PM |
| 1 | #notallmuslims, in semblance to #notallmen, should be created to show the hypocrisy of media feminists reactionsLet us assume that the Qur'an does say that (which it doesn't)... O Prophet! Make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites. Be harsh with them. Their ultimate abode is hell, a hapless journey's end. - 9:73 But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever you find them. - 4:89 Make war on them until idolatry is no more and Allah's religion reigns supreme - 8:39 It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he has made slaughter in the land. - 8:67 Allah will humble the unbeliever… | /r/MensRights | 11/01/15 06:48 PM |
| 26 | Elastic heart: this video is being condemned as pedophilia. Yeah, there's no demonization of males as sex monsters in this culture, right?I feel this is one of those cases of 'art as a mirror'. If you watch this video and see pedophilia, you're probably obsessed with pedophilia. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/15 05:52 PM |
| 3 | I think I found a major flaw in Gender Feminism, but I can't find any literature discussing it. I'm hoping someone here can help.Has anyone here ever come across a discussion about this issue? If feminism was at all self-critical the world would soon be bereft of feminists. Feminism is not based on logic, reason, or evidence. It's based on feels and faith. You listen and believe or you hate women. There's no middle ground in their minds. Because of this, it's nearly impossible for any truly deep self examination to come from within the feminist movement. It's possible for the inconsistency you've pointed out here to be ha… | /r/MensRights | 08/01/15 12:45 AM |
| 9 | In light of all the Ched Evans news stories, I thought I'd share the key and undisputed facts - not portrayed by the media.When questioned in the police station it should be noted that neither of the accused had ejaculated during sex as a result of which the police had no forensic evidence to link either man to the sexual act, nor did the police have a complaint of rape. Regardless of this, both men gave a full account of their actions to the police. On 26th July 2011 the police charged both Clayton and Ched with rape. Never talk to the police, it can only harm you. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/15 07:33 PM |
| 0 | PSA: To all of the guys out there with a pregnant woman unsure about paternity... Find a Red Pill doctor!I'd guess it's either diet or you know a lot of natives that have a bit of other races in them. The gene that causes this is actually recessive, the stinky gene is dominate. This means it's more likely to occur in a genetically homogenous society like Korea or Japan. Native Americans have been mixing with other races for so long many of them might have lost it. | /r/TheRedPill | 01/01/15 02:08 AM |
| 19 | PSA: To all of the guys out there with a pregnant woman unsure about paternity... Find a Red Pill doctor!Generally yes (also native Americans). They also have different sweat glands (the same genes encode for both) which is why they don't stink much when they sweat. | /r/TheRedPill | 31/12/14 09:34 AM |
| 4 | Tiffany "New York" Pollard's pussy pass denied on her own showProbably started as a mispronunciation of "wretched" (very poor in quality or ability). | /r/PussyPassDenied | 24/12/14 12:37 AM |
| 1 | More rape culture hysteria. Do you think this story is true?... "Raped Teen FINALLY Gets Some Justice. #IAmJada"There's no evidence (so far) to support or debunk it. There's apparently one photo of her passed out, supposedly disrobed in some fashion. There's no talk of a rape kit being done, eye witnesses coming forward, or a tox screen for drugs. So far this is pre-news, people writing down their biases and suppositions and pretending it's factual. | /r/MensRights | 20/12/14 07:50 PM |
| 3 | GamerGate -- The Great Trap MRA's Need to AvoidBy saying that you can't address female privilege using "feminist terms" (aka terms as feminists understand them), you are saying that it is literally impossible for feminists to understand what we are trying to say. Not at all. I'm saying you cannot use feminist concepts when talking to feminists about something that their ideology doesn't already accept as valid. The feminist lexicon (much like Newspeak) is constructed so as to disallow the thinking of certain thoughts. There are no 'feminist … | /r/MensRights | 08/12/14 08:43 PM |
| 3 | GamerGate -- The Great Trap MRA's Need to AvoidIf we understand their definition, even if we disagree with it, we can reword what we are trying to say to fit in with their definitions of terms. Once you start using their words to talk to them you're limiting yourself to their concepts. The definitions they use are designed to constrict thought to conform with their ideology. For example, sexism=power+prejudice, gamergate=harassment of women, due process for rapists=rape culture, saying 'hello' to a woman on the street=harassment, female priv… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/14 05:08 PM |
| 3 | GamerGate -- The Great Trap MRA's Need to Avoid...we can't just look at how we see a term, we have to look at how others see terms as well. You're absolutely right. But then we have to compare how others perceive something with reality and see if it matches up. The view that GamerGate is about the sexual harassment of women just doesn't coincide with reality. Do you have any evidence to support your view? If you do, you might want to edit your post and put it in because otherwise people might assume that you're just talking out of your ass. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/14 09:11 AM |
| 5 | GamerGate -- The Great Trap MRA's Need to AvoidI have a good rule of thumb that you could probably benefit from. Feminists are never right. If you think a feminist is right, look again. Odds are good you'll find something wrong with what's being said. As an example I'll point out that GamerGate is not about sexually harassing women on the internet. That being the case, your post falls apart right from the start. What's left is a mish-mash of sexuality shaming (both male and female) and white knighting (or damseling if you're a woman). | /r/MensRights | 08/12/14 08:02 AM |
| 1 | Women never lie about rape, says the Washington Post, and we should always believe them.Quotes are often used to denote sarcasm or snark especially where another mechanism (like the quote block) is used to indicate an actual quote. In this case it was to convey that the concept of "manning up" is ridiculous. Tell you what, I'll change them to single quotes just for you. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/14 07:55 PM |
| 2 | Women never lie about rape, says the Washington Post, and we should always believe them.The author is talking about the period after the accusation, but before a conviction/trial. She's promoting the idea that the public should treat the accused as if they raped the accuser even before any legal action. She holds despicable views, but she wasn't attempting to minimize the consequences of a rape conviction. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/14 10:49 AM |
| 3 | Women never lie about rape, says the Washington Post, and we should always believe them.If these people gave an actual fuck about protecting actual rape victims they would be going after the false accuses with such hatred and conviction as they do accused men. Ideology and in-group bias are a potent combination. Together they're able to overcome rational thought to a surprising degree. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/14 10:30 AM |
| 188 | Women never lie about rape, says the Washington Post, and we should always believe them.The accused would have a rough period. He might be suspended from his job; friends might de-friend him on Facebook. The cost of disbelieving women, on the other hand, is far steeper. It signals that that women don’t matter and that they are disposable So it's alright to treat a man as disposable but not a woman? I suppose he should just 'man up' and take the abuse so the poor accuser (who may be lying) doesn't have to deal with the 'trauma' of having her story examined. Survivors’ memories are o… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/14 07:32 PM |
| 9 | Terry Crews: Modern Day Masculinity Can be as Damaging as the TalibanHow disappointing. Another famous man throwing other men under the bus for a chance to sell books. Oh well, he got his, I guess that's what's really important. <sup>/s</sup> | /r/MensRights | 02/12/14 04:44 AM |
| 1 | Is this a good representation of MRA'S?So I went to click an intelligent post and missed. I ended up looking at this pearl clutching trash post instead. | /r/MensRights | 30/11/14 08:05 AM |
| 4 | "Feminism: the other F-word" : "It’s like a huge dam made of foreskin has been broken, making way for a flood of estrogen-infused water. Yuck, but cool."Rebecca Kohler is a stand-up comic, writer, actor, gymnast, lawyer and chemist. (Some of this isn’t true.) Judging from the quality of the article, I'd guess that she's neither a stand-up comic nor a writer. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/14 06:26 PM |
| 7 | 56%? No way. Very hard to believe. "Despite gains, still a gender gap in pay, jobs, education"Here's the report the article is based off of. (.pdf) Basically it's the same old story. Instead of blaming the earnings gap on the choices women make they blame gender discrimination. Their "shocking" statistic that the wealthiest areas of Connecticut have a larger pay gap is what one would expect given the choices that women generally make. More wealth means more economic freedom. This means women can afford to make employment choices based not on salary but on quality of life (flexible hours,… | /r/MensRights | 29/11/14 06:20 PM |
| 5 | Where are the mens rights activists when black men are being killed by police?Men being killed for being black and being men attacking a police officer is not a mens right issue? FTFY, and no, no it's not. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/14 11:29 AM |
| 0 | Why are criminal women treated with such compassion compared to men?My, my... how hostile. As /u/tallwheel says elsewhere in this thread, I'm not justifying female privilege I'm explaining why it occurs (you know, almost as if I'm answering the question first posed by OP). Nature (or God if you prefer) has equipped us with certain instincts in order to survive. Part of that instinct is to protect the sex that limits our survival. Like it or not, this instinct presents a problem to anyone interested in real equality. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/14 12:33 PM |
| 1 | Why are criminal women treated with such compassion compared to men?An economic principle that assumes that individuals always make prudent and logical decisions that provide them with the greatest benefit or satisfaction and that are in their highest self-interest. I can see where this would be useful if you're modelling economic activity but as your link points out, people often act irrationally even in economic matters. Do minorities commit more crimes based on being a minority, or based on being poor, which also happens to be more of the minority groups? Why… | /r/MensRights | 18/11/14 09:40 PM |
| 1 | Why are criminal women treated with such compassion compared to men?I already answered that. It's because our logic and methods may be flawed. So... "people are stupid" is your explanation. A child could see that it makes no logical sense to cut women slack just because they're women. But I guess these judges, prosecutors, juries, politicians, etc. all over the world are just too stupid to realize that their thinking is flawed. I wonder what the flaw could be? It can't be emotional because humans are logical and the only explanation is a flaw in logic... Why do … | /r/MensRights | 18/11/14 08:24 PM |
| 1 | Why are criminal women treated with such compassion compared to men?We do act for logical reasons. We do can act for logical reasons. The OP gives a perfect example. Why do judicial systems throughout the world give sentencing discounts to women? While there are some notable examples of countries that don't, it's a very widespread practice. What logical explanation do you give for this? | /r/MensRights | 18/11/14 07:27 PM |
| 5 | Why are criminal women treated with such compassion compared to men?Believing that humans always act for logical reasons is, itself, illogical. Plus I'd like to point out that what I said was if you reduced the population of women to next to nothing you've doomed humanity. Use your reading skills please. | /r/MensRights | 18/11/14 04:17 PM |
| 0 | Why are criminal women treated with such compassion compared to men?Because while eggs are precious, sperm is cheap. If you remove a man from society (prison, execution, etc.) it doesn't matter as far as the survival of the species goes. Theoretically you could reduce the population of men to next to nothing and humanity would continue on. Do the same to women and you've doomed humanity. Wombs are a resource that humankind has to protect in order to survive. | /r/MensRights | 18/11/14 02:09 PM |
| 2 | How does the MRM feel about rape culture?Yes, I acknowledged the danger of getting too drunk to protect yourself is a reality. What does that have to do with rape culture or the normalization of rape? Does the fact that being drunk makes you vulnerable somehow make rape so prevalent as to be considered usual or ordinary? | /r/MensRights | 17/11/14 08:59 PM |
| 2 | How does the MRM feel about rape culture?I'm sorry, painting what as a reality? The "it" in your reply is ambiguous and I hesitate to guess what you meant. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/14 08:21 PM |
| 3 | How does the MRM feel about rape culture?So you are saying that its not really safe for women to drink alcohol... It's not safe for anyone to drink alcohol. It impairs coordination and judgement. While it's your right to drink if you wish, you are subjecting yourself to these effects. ...if they feel safe after the nail varnish, its a false safety. Due to the constant over-hyping of date rape drugs and the cries of "victim blaming" by feminists whenever a victim's drinking is mentioned, the larger danger of getting too drunk to protect… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/14 08:07 PM |
| 2 | How does the MRM feel about rape culture?I described what feminists are talking about when the say normalized. On this we agree. Unfortunately feminist's perception of reality and actual reality don't ever often agree. There were even people here that think its so normal, its common sense for women to paint on anit rape nail varnish and stand there dipping it in their drink. I find it sad that so many live in such great fear. Unfortunately these women might be lulled into a false sense of safety since (by far) the biggest date rape dru… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/14 07:11 PM |
| 3 | How does the MRM feel about rape culture?Except what you've described isn't the normalization of rape. Rape (of women) isn't normalized, it's not usual or ordinary. What you've described are responses to the fact that rape exists. The phrase "well thats what happens when you drink too much at a frat party" doesn't mean that rape is commonplace. It acknowledges that rape exists and because of that fact, it's probably not a good idea to voluntarily make yourself helpless somewhere you could be raped. It doesn't mean everyone thinks its g… | /r/MensRights | 17/11/14 06:35 PM |
| 3 | How does the MRM feel about rape culture?Normal: usual or ordinary : not strange Normalized: to have been made normal | /r/MensRights | 17/11/14 12:55 AM |
| 3 | 'Drunk Girl In Public' Viral Video Is Allegedly A HoaxJust because this particular video may have been staged, however, does not mean that the behaviors portrayed are unrealistic. Good ol' HuffPo, even in an article about a feminist hoax they have to shill for the feminists. | /r/MensRights | 16/11/14 12:58 PM |
| 5 | Ohio State Senator plans to introduce bill that expands selective service registration to require women as well.The selective service website won't come out and say it because the voting restrictions for felons are applied by the states. Vermont and Maine are the only states not to restrict voting rights for felons. In those states you're only obligated to pay $250,000 and 5 years of your life if you don't comply and potentially your life/health if you do. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/14 11:24 AM |
| 9 | Ohio State Senator plans to introduce bill that expands selective service registration to require women as well.Here you go. Registering with Selective Service is the law. Failure to register is a felony, punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or five years in jail. Since it's a felony, only two states will allow you to retain your voting rights (Vermont and Maine). So I suppose technically if you live in those states you don't lose your right to vote, everyone else does though. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/14 11:11 AM |
| 30 | Feminist Professor: "We should stop putting women in jail. For anything." (prison should be for males only)Patricia O'Brien is an associate professor at the Jane Addams College of Social Work at University of Illinois at Chicago. A whole college devoted to social work, what a nightmare that student body must be. Nothing but tumblrinas and SRSters everywhere you look. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/14 07:41 AM |
| 3 | Feminists have taken over /r/OneY and have banned all mention of MRAs and feminism through AutoModerator. I've been waiting for this to happen for months and now they've finally made their move to modk | /r/MensRights | 03/11/14 12:30 AM |
| 5 | Feminists have taken over /r/OneY and have banned all mention of MRAs and feminism through AutoModerator. I've been waiting for this to happen for months and now they've finally made their move to modThe vast majority of those subreddits are tiny to the point of being defunct... It's not my fault you don't mod better subs, but when you do mod you almost always make sure to surround yourself with fellow SRSters. So 2X is an SRS sub, and /r/politics is an SRS sub, and SubredditDrama is an SRS sub - because they all have subject matter SRS people care about, right? No, an SRS sub is one that is moderated by SRSters and has a majority of the posts submitted by SRSters. You'll notice /r/ainbow di… | /r/MensRights | 02/11/14 11:05 PM |
| 8 | Feminists have taken over /r/OneY and have banned all mention of MRAs and feminism through AutoModerator. I've been waiting for this to happen for months and now they've finally made their move to modSRS controlled subs you moderate: /r/TheBluePill/ /r/transtimelines/ /r/FaithInHumanity/ /r/transeducate/ /r/askGSM/ /r/SRDBroke/ /r/Game0fDolls/ /r/TheTransphobiaSquad/ /r/allies/ /r/AskStrawFeminists/ /r/NoNap/ /r/GenderCynical/ /r/CringeBroke/ /r/SRDBrokeMovies/ /r/RobotAnna/ /r/moderatorproblems/ /r/starrealms/ /r/SRDBrokeMusic/ /r/TransKink/ /r/TAKEitTOrCIRCLEJERK/ /r/plsrespond/ /r/AntiSRDBroke/ /r/SRDBrokeBooks/ /r/sayingthings/ /r/PostSRDBroke/ /r/Peter/ /r/AmICreepy/ /r/SRDBOpenModMail/… | /r/MensRights | 02/11/14 08:26 AM |
| 5 | Feminists have taken over /r/OneY and have banned all mention of MRAs and feminism through AutoModerator. I've been waiting for this to happen for months and now they've finally made their move to modWhiiiiich I'm not either... Somewhere around 80% of the subs you moderate are controlled by SRSters. How do you figure you're not SRS? Just because you don't post in SRS Prime? | /r/MensRights | 02/11/14 05:01 AM |
| 3 | Feminists have taken over /r/OneY and have banned all mention of MRAs and feminism through AutoModerator. I've been waiting for this to happen for months and now they've finally made their move to modI am not SRS. SRS controlled subs you moderate: /r/nottheonion /r/antisrs /r/Game0fDolls /r/NoNap/ /r/misandry/ /r/feministfrequency/ /r/r_r/ /r/thisiswhyyourefat/ /r/askgreenduch/ /r/greenduchisamazing/ /r/jerktalkplatinum/ /r/hatshop/ /r/slashfiction/ /r/gardengonelive/ /r/truemetasrdbroke/ /r/slashrumors/ /r/eightNote/ /r/Fear_Of_Cupcake/ /r/SubredditDrama/ Plus some I left out because there were almost no posts in them. Yeah I don't know why anyone thinks you're SRS. /s | /r/MensRights | 02/11/14 04:49 AM |
| 1 | Jian Ghomeshi, Sexual Violence, and (why I think) the Presumption of Innocence (is stupid) ... Seriously?How do you not get that I have showed you the "fundamental" difference. Yeah but, 'A 40 year old having sex with a 16 year old is predatory because the 40 year old wants to have sex with the 16 year old.' isn't a logical argument, it's circular reasoning. Again you resort to BS like "you must be 14" which is why I'm almost 100% assured that you're fucking retarded. Yes, calling someone retarded while you avoid engaging in anything even approaching logical thought is totally a sign of maturity. O… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/14 07:02 PM |
| 1 | Jian Ghomeshi, Sexual Violence, and (why I think) the Presumption of Innocence (is stupid) ... Seriously?It's fairly obvious what my argument is,... Yes it's encapsulated quite well in this quote of yours "Everyone down voting because they think it should be cool for 40yo people to fuck 16yo kids is sick. This is not "cultural". You're sick". Wow! You totally changed my view with your unsubstantiated assertion! /s BTW, here's a good rule of thumb. When you find yourself thinking of your own argument in terms of "It's obvious that..." or "Everyone knows that..." it's a good bet you haven't criticall… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/14 05:59 PM |
| 1 | Jian Ghomeshi, Sexual Violence, and (why I think) the Presumption of Innocence (is stupid) ... Seriously?Ah so no actual response to my points, good job. /s Again you bring up the gender issue and try and to use it to prove how I'm wrong. The sentence about teachers was to highlight how people's feelings can cause them to fall into logical inconsistencies. Instead of acknowledging this point it seems you've chosen to double down on your moral outrage and pretend I said teachers having sex with students was fine. But the fact is that it's already illegal... A 40 year old having sex with a 16 year ol… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/14 11:53 AM |
| 1 | Jian Ghomeshi, Sexual Violence, and (why I think) the Presumption of Innocence (is stupid) ... Seriously?And I'm just trying to point out that believing that the age gap makes a difference is illogical. A 16 year old is quite capable of seducing and using another 16 year old for sex. The victim might be seduced because they're the 'rich kid' with their own car, maybe they're a local sports legend, maybe they're popular with the 'in crowd'. Unless it's demonstrable that a sexual relationship with a 40 year old is more damaging than a relationship with another 16 year old, why make the age distinctio… | /r/MensRights | 30/10/14 03:07 AM |
| 0 | Jian Ghomeshi, Sexual Violence, and (why I think) the Presumption of Innocence (is stupid) ... Seriously?I'm guessing you're not bright enough to understand the connection so I'll spell it out... Oh please do, I'm sure it will be as insightful an explanation as could be expected from someone who can't spell the word predatory correctly. ...and charm them into making a decision they might not make under different circumstances... So you don't believe that a 16 year old is able to make wise decisions about who to have sex with. If you had said that to begin with we wouldn't be having this discussion. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/14 01:48 AM |
| 4 | Jian Ghomeshi, Sexual Violence, and (why I think) the Presumption of Innocence (is stupid) ... Seriously?You're right, that was to help draw a parallel. Yes, I know what its purpose was, I was pointing out that it's unsuitable for the purpose you intended. There is no parallel to be drawn here. You view the 40 year old as the professional basketball team and the 16 year old is represented by the middle school kids. In competition such a contest is fundamentally unfair. Outside of a competition it's perfectly fine for more experienced players to participate in activities with those less experienced.… | /r/MensRights | 29/10/14 11:36 PM |
| 5 | Jian Ghomeshi, Sexual Violence, and (why I think) the Presumption of Innocence (is stupid) ... Seriously?You wouldn't let a professional basketball team compete against middle school kids would you? Except sex isn't a competition. You're buying into the whole "Males are the predators and females are their prey" mindset. With that view of male sexuality yes, it's fundamentally unfair to subject the poor defenseless, not fully mentally developed girl to the predations of an older man. That's not to say that age of consent laws serve no purpose. They act to protect those who (probably) aren't able to … | /r/MensRights | 29/10/14 09:35 PM |
| 4 | When I talk about men's issues my wife says I sound like a c*@% !!!!!The feminists basically drowned out their fringe ( the lesbian separatists, etc.) by winning enough hearts and minds in the mainstream that their core issues became mainstream concerns. LOL! Feminists "drowned out" their fringe by adopting many of their beliefs and attitudes into mainstream feminism. The lesbian separatists may be still on the fringe but their attitude towards men lives on in the Duluth model of DV and the recent destruction of the right to a fair trial. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/14 01:42 AM |
| 1 | A discussion in/r/gaybros about gay men fearing to associate with male children brings very concerning issuesThey might (mistakenly) believe that my describing public perception about gay males and pedophilia means that I subscribe to or endorse that public perception. There's information missing from my post that I chose not to include because it doesn't have much of an impact on public perception, perhaps someone took exception to that. For example, 60% of the male victims reported that they had been victimized by a woman at some point, yet that doesn't seem to be reflected in the '96% of reported ch… | /r/MensRights | 27/10/14 12:54 AM |
| 2 | A discussion in/r/gaybros about gay men fearing to associate with male children brings very concerning issuesIs there source for that? Not a single source, no. Due to muddling of the definitions you have to look at multiple sources. We know that 96% of reported child molesters are male. We also know that 1/3<sup>rd</sup> of the victims are male. This means that male on male child molestation occurs at a rate way higher than one would expect given the 2-4% of the population that are gay males. Remember, what we're discussing here is perception, and perception is often biased. While there are more males … | /r/MensRights | 27/10/14 12:08 AM |
| -1 | A discussion in/r/gaybros about gay men fearing to associate with male children brings very concerning issuesBecause a lot of pedophiles are gay males (by the common, not the psychiatric definition) and people are (due to the way our brains work) generally unable to draw a distinction between the two statements "many pedophiles are gay males" and "many gay males are pedophiles". Our brains are wired for generalization to optimize our survival potential. When the public sees a threat (NAMBLA, Catholic priests, etc.) and it's correlated with a certain subgroup (gay men), they turn against that subgroup a… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/14 10:49 PM |
| 7 | Female marriage counselor drops RP truth, gets downvoted to oblivion.Just wanted to point out that /r/offmychest is an SRS satellite sub (a sub that's run entirely by SRSters but doesn't appear in "The Fempire" sub list). Notice on the sidebar: This is a safe space for people of any and all backgrounds. Oppressive attitudes and language will not be tolerated. Any content that is deemed sexist, racist, transphobic, homophobic, classist, ableist, or intolerant of certain religions will be removed and the user banned. In addition, slut-shaming, victim-blaming, body-… | /r/TheRedPill | 25/10/14 06:50 AM |
| 0 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?k | /r/MensRights | 24/10/14 06:18 PM |
| 0 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?Men had better act like men, meaning do our chores and dress the part. That's enforcement of gender roles, not male disposability. Male disposability requires the demonstration of two things, the using of a male, and the disposing of that male, neither of which you're able to provide an example of with respect to specifically men in dresses (which is what this is about). Well it's higher up than arguing on a reddit thread, so you fail by your own standards. I didtn' set such standards so you can… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 09:41 PM |
| 0 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?Denying him personhood, forcing him into a mold. Like a robot. Disposable, fungible. I'm not interested in whether people believe it demonstrates disposability, I'm interested in whether they can prove it. I'll ask again in case you missed it. How is society using a man wearing a dress and then throwing him away? You simply claimed it was happening without actually demonstrating it. Bear in mind in order to qualify as an answer it must demonstrate disposability above and beyond that of a man not… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 07:12 PM |
| 1 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?Never did I once say that I would rather funds go to the issue of men in dresses over things that are obviously more important. It's good to see we agree on some things. You cannot take that and say that other issues are NOT a men's right issue, though, or that they are entirely unimportant. Except what I actually said was "Personally I'd put your choice of apparel dead last as an issue.". When do you think something becomes a non-issue or totally unimportant? When it's ranked dead last or when … | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 02:59 AM |
| 1 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?I do not think that many of these issues women tout are non-issues. You're right, they're not non-issues, they're imaginary. The only reason the patriarchy, rape culture, and the wage gap are issues is because feminists are pretending they're real problems that exist. Assuming you feel that all of us should take your view (a big assumption, to be sure), do you really expect to be taken seriously when advocating for what you feel is important? Sure, why not? Society mocking men for wearing dresse… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/14 12:44 AM |
| 0 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?No. Male disposability actually. You suck at guessing btw. How exactly is male disposability involved in people making fun of a man wearing a dress? Look at the root word, disposable: made to be thrown away after one use or several uses. How is society using a man wearing a dress and then throwing him away? There's many instances of male disposability in society, this isn't one of them. Then I suppose you're fighting Boko Haram yourself right now? Didn't think so. Your statement only makes sense… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/14 11:50 PM |
| 1 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?To play devil's advocate - why does asking about this issue mean that those issues aren't something that is important as well? Important: marked by or indicative of significant worth or consequence. Is it significant? In light of the other pressing issues I would say it's not. Everything used to fight such issues is limited. The MRM only has so much manpower, so much money, so much time. Likewise, the people listening have limited time, money, and energy. Every time an issue is pushed for you're… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/14 07:55 PM |
| 2 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?The difference here is that feminism's 'problems' are imaginary. THE PATRIARCHY (doesn't exist), rape culture (non-existent), the wage gap (doesn't say what they think it says). They're over there shadow boxing while claiming to be in a titanic struggle for women's rights. Meanwhile they're ignoring the 85% of the homeless that are men, turning their backs on male circumcision (they got theirs made illegal after all), and pretending women are the only victims of rape/DV. They ignore real problem… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/14 07:24 PM |
| 0 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?Has it occurred to you that these issues are caused by the same underlying problem? Let me guess... it's THE PATRIARCHY™. ...this is an issue that feminists like to claim for themselves... Of course they claim it. All their big problems have already been solved, that's why they're able to complain about hurt feelings all the time instead of real discrimination. ...you don't get to ignore issues because of a priority hierarchy. Sure I do. What someone wears is just not as important as someone dyi… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/14 07:14 PM |
| 2 | Please tell me you guys don't agree with this video. Video link will be in the Comments.It's always been cited as if women are paid less for the same work. If it wasn't explicitly stated it was certainly implied. No one would rally around "Women are paid less because they don't work as many hours and don't select the same high pay, demanding careers as men!" to combat 'sexism' so they have to lie about it. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/14 08:54 AM |
| -1 | When do you think it will be socially acceptable to wear dresses?Men are unfairly losing their children, male suicide is out of control, most of the homeless are men, male circumcision is still legal, the vast majority of on-the-job deaths are men, male life expectancy is lagging way behind women, the majority of college graduates (U.S.) are now women (~65%), the federal government (U.S.) has bypassed the judicial system essentially eliminating the right to a fair trial, police are arresting male DV victims, only males are subject to a military draft (U.S.), … | /r/MensRights | 22/10/14 08:40 AM |
| 7 | Drunk Woman Says Cop Sexually Assaulted Her, Cop Shuts Her Down With Video EvidenceUPDATE: Albuquerque Police Department spokesman Tanner Tixier told TheBlaze on Monday evening that police were not pursuing additional charges against Griego because, despite the apparent falsehood of her sexual assault claim, police did not want to set a precedent that could discourage other potential victims of sexual assault from coming forward. I'm sure letting women break the law with impunity won't backfire in any way. After all, I've heard the best way to discourage bad behavior is to ens… | /r/MensRights | 21/10/14 03:15 AM |
| 2 | Not sure what to make of /r/againstmensrightsIt's an SRS sub. It was founded and is moderated by SRSters, some of the most hateful and bigoted people on Reddit. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/14 08:35 AM |
| 2 | r/offmychest thinks MRM is over there trying to convert feminists. Is that right? Also, the mods aren't very nice.OffMyChest is an SRS satellite sub. While it doesn't appear on the official list of fempire subs it's modded by SRSters. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/14 02:58 AM |
| 1 | Friend trying to argue MRM is garbage sent me this article. Rip it apart r/menrightsWhat exactly do feminist win? Title of "The Most Bigoted Social Movement"? Maybe "The Dog in the Manger Award"? All the MRM has ever asked of feminism is for it to stop attacking men. It seems simple enough, but for some reason feminists are unable or unwilling to do so. It's no wonder people are more and more reluctant to identify as feminists. Hopefully your hateful ideology will die and make room for a movement devoted to equality. Until then I guess you can wallow in the self satisfaction th… | /r/MensRights | 15/09/14 01:50 AM |
| 1 | Friend trying to argue MRM is garbage sent me this article. Rip it apart r/menrightsso only questions asked by people who agree with you and support your cause are worth addressing? No. There's 2 possible answers to your question about the MRM. Either the MRM is ineffectual or it's not. If it is ineffectual, why would you care? In that case it's not accomplishing anything for you to be ticked off about. Furthermore there might be legitimate reasons for them not being effective. For one thing, feminists are fighting the MRM tooth and nail and right now, feminism is the predomina… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/14 09:35 PM |
| 1 | Friend trying to argue MRM is garbage sent me this article. Rip it apart r/menrightsit's insane that you've posted so many times without addressing the content of what i'm asking. Because you're not asking in good faith. You seem to think that the MRM has somehow failed if it doesn't live up to your expectations for what a men's movement should be. Why should I care whether you're satisfied with the MRM? The MRM isn't for you, it's for people who care about men. You're not pleased with the MRM? I'm not pleased with feminism. It's had decades and oodles of funding and has only m… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/14 06:29 AM |
| 2 | Friend trying to argue MRM is garbage sent me this article. Rip it apart r/menrightsdo you not understand how debate works? you present an affirmative statement, then one side argues in favor of the statement, and the other argues in opposition of it. Yes, you presented an affirmative statement and as evidence to support it you presented....nothing. Good job. my evidence for the affirmative side is that i have never seen a campaign of any size... Your ignorance is evidence for nothing but your ignorance, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/14 12:34 AM |
| 2 | Why feminists will never understand us.the duluth model is not law. The Duluth model is enshrined in law if it weren't no one would give a shit about it. The Duluth model isn't just some fantasy like patriarchy theory, its impact is felt through the application of laws based on its principles. So no, I don't care if Maryland has an equal rights amendment, they don't enforce it so it doesn't matter. Why is only one gender being told having children means leaving work and giving up a career? Citation needed. Breastfeeding groups fight … | /r/MensRights | 13/09/14 12:26 AM |
| 2 | Friend trying to argue MRM is garbage sent me this article. Rip it apart r/menrights...the MRM is an ineffective movement because it makes little to no effort to create tangible social change. You're the one presenting a statement as fact, it's up to you to present evidence supporting it. Your ignorance is not evidence that your statement is true, it's simply evidence that you don't know any facts supporting your statement. In short, what is presented without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 11:45 PM |
| 2 | Why feminists will never understand us.There is nothing in the law that says male DV victims should be treated any differently by law enforcement than female victims. Yes there is. The Duluth model mandates that women and men be treated differently by police/courts and this is enshrined in MD law. Maryland's actions (Duluth model) speak louder than it's words (a constitutional amendment that they don't actually enforce). Fathers don't have to interrupt their careers to raise children. Is that not discrimination? A woman who interrupt… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 10:43 PM |
| 2 | Why feminists will never understand us.Those are the sorts of things this amendment protects. Oh I get it! Gender equality isn't really meant to apply in all cases just certain cases that feminists like yourself have deemed important. I guess in those cases where men are victimized, e.g. the Duluth model of DV, gender equality can take a back seat. It's not like men deserve equality anyway amiright? /s DV is dealt with in laws, anyway, not constitutional amendments. A constitution is the supreme law of a land. Prove that the wage gap… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 06:40 PM |
| 2 | Friend trying to argue MRM is garbage sent me this article. Rip it apart r/menrightsThese are questions, not arguments. Furthermore they're ridiculous questions since you could quite easily look up the information yourself and find that the answer is "They are already doing so". They have certainly not been as successful as feminism has at monopolizing public funds solely for the care of women, but they're making progress. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 05:41 PM |
| 7 | Extremely Misleading info Graphic that depicts women as incorrectly suffering the most from suicides.. but the data is actually showing males far outnumber women.Personally I found this part to be perplexing. Despite representing about 2 percent of the overall U.S. population, Native Americans have the second-highest suicide rate. It's a rate of suicide, it doesn't matter how big or small the population is to start with. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 07:03 AM |
| 2 | Friend trying to argue MRM is garbage sent me this article. Rip it apart r/menrightsSo wait, the park where you actually debunk it with fact and clear logical argument? She never makes a logical argument to debunk. The article only seems to make sense if you already believe what she has to say. Looked at dispassionately, it's just a string of unsupported assertions. For example, her argument that 'the patriarchy hurts men too', which is what paragraphs 8,9, and 10 boil down to, only makes sense if you already believe in patriarchy theory. Since patriarchy theory is a faith base… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 06:44 AM |
| 2 | Why feminists will never understand us.you know what, I'll pick out one for you. Maryland: "Equality of rights under the law shall not be abridged or denied because of sex." I couldn't care less what statute Maryland has passed. For one thing they're using the Duluth model of DV so this law just pays lip service to gender equality. Ever heard of the National Committee on Pay Equality? Nope but a quick internet search shows that they're pushing the lie that the misnamed wage gap is due to discrimination against women. You're not reall… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 05:59 AM |
| 1 | Why feminists will never understand us.Feminism is what feminism does. Feminism is not a belief in equality between men and women, feminism is the Duluth model, the Tender Years Doctrine, NOW successfully fighting against shared custody, lowered standard for conviction for sexual assault on campus, making sexual contact by college students illegal in California, distributing false statistics on rape/child abuse/wage gap, permanent alimony, her body her choice/his wallet his child support, etc. Not one feminist 'success' has been abou… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 04:06 AM |
| 5 | Friend trying to argue MRM is garbage sent me this article. Rip it apart r/menrightsI bet the author is an AMRat, she hits nearly every one of their talking points. Let's look at a breakdown by paragraph: Intro Fluff Claim that my opinions are correct and MRA opinions are not. (baseless assertion) Deny that men are systematically oppressed for being men. Claim that misandry doesn't exist. Strawman MRM beliefs about feminism. Claim that the MRM is a reactionary movement. (Just like the AMRats she either confuses the MRM with some traditionalist movement or she doesn't know what … | /r/MensRights | 12/09/14 03:22 AM |
| 2 | In view of the corruption and bias of #Gamergate & #notyourshield, let's ban all links to the 6 sites pushing Sarskeesian/Quinn!...while they silence any voices to the contrary. Yeah, you should probably leave the censorship and hypocrisy to the feminists, they're so much better at it. Instead of banning all links, what about only banning direct links? That way no censorship occurs and discussions can be had but these sites would be deprived of views. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/14 03:20 PM |
| 1 | A man on facebook threatened to rape me and attack my girlfriend. Is there anything the police could do?You're just slinging around terms that you either don't know the meaning of or don't care to use correctly. Nothing I asked can be legitimately interpreted as victim-blaming/shaming. I challenge you to point out where I blamed and/or shamed OP in any way for being threatened. "Put up or shut up" as the saying goes, let's see what you've got. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/14 05:04 AM |
| 2 | A man on facebook threatened to rape me and attack my girlfriend. Is there anything the police could do?I disagree with how most MRAs want to solve their issues, but that doesn't mean individuals from this subreddit have nothing to offer. But you do believe that MRAs have nothing to offer when it comes to men's rights issues. If this is a men's rights issue (and it seems you agree that it is) why would you ask the men's rights sub? According to your own words, MRAs shouldn't be involved in men's rights issues, these should be handled only by feminism (specifically women feminists). | /r/MensRights | 22/08/14 12:23 PM |
| 3 | A man on facebook threatened to rape me and attack my girlfriend. Is there anything the police could do?It took you 2 days to completely change your point of view concerning the MRM? You no longer think MRAs are scum who should sit down, shut up and let only women's voices be heard? MRAs grievances are due to injustice because of patriarchy. Feminism at it's core undermines patriarchy. Men's rights issues would sort themselves out if patriarchy itself is undermined. Due to the nature of patriarchy, women should take the leading role in the movement to undermine it. Men need to step back and let wo… | /r/MensRights | 22/08/14 10:59 AM |
| 0 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiYou're still replying? Now that you've revealed how desperate you are for adult attention it pleases me to withdraw it. Since I won't be replying anymore you'll just have to settle for crying yourself to sleep during your My Little Pony marathon. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/14 01:31 AM |
| 0 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiYou've got nothing but your irrational and immoral support for the removal of voting rights from men who don't sign up for the draft. Rebuttals to your position practically write themselves. On the other hand it seems you've settled at the level of pathetic insults after your so-called logic failed to convince people that your bigoted stance is correct. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/14 01:20 AM |
| 0 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiAww, it's so cute that you think i am still reading these. Plainly you're not only reading them but replying to them. Ur a genius! | /r/MensRights | 16/08/14 01:01 AM |
| 1 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBi...i write this only for any one still observing this exchange I would have thought the better action would have been to keep silent rather than display your bigotry even more. Is removing the voting rights of men that important to you that you'll act like a fool just to have a chance to convince a couple people that you're right? You'd be better off posting in AMR or SRS, they'll agree with you wholeheartedly over there. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/14 02:58 PM |
| 1 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiI guess you love the idea of taking the vote away from men too much to reason clearly. Just because the Obama administration isn't deporting millions of illegal aliens doesn't suddenly make what those aliens are doing legal. You can't claim that deportation isn't a consequence for entering the US illegally, even though millions have gotten away with it. Likewise, even though many people may have not registered for the draft and are still able to vote (due to non-prosecution) doesn't mean that lo… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/14 02:48 PM |
| 1 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiYou are clearly a fool, or worse -- a goat thief. Calling me names isn't going to distract anyone from seeing that you support taking the right to vote from men who don't register for the draft. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/14 01:27 AM |
| 1 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiBy your logic murder is legal now because some people get away with killing people. You can't equate the illegal acts of fugitives from justice with the legal acts of law abiding citizens. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/14 01:18 AM |
| 0 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBi...men who don't register for the draft and who are lucky enough not to be prosecuted do not lose the vote. Fixed that for you. Every law works on this principle. You have to be convicted before the punishment is enacted. Even if the government isn't prosecuting men right at this exact moment, upon conviction males who have not registered will have their right to vote terminated. I guess you're fine with that, I'm not. Calling people on this sub idiots and arguing that men who don't register for… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/14 01:09 AM |
| 1 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiFail to register for the draft Get convicted Lose the vote or Register for draft (Don't even bother if you're female) Keep your vote Seems pretty straightforward to me. I'm sure the people that were denied their vote due to not registering for the draft are comforted by your pedantry. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 01:43 PM |
| 2 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiYour second paragraph marks you as an asshole. Apparently in your world people can't be ignorant and be corrected, they have to be disingenuous at best. I was talking about the original poster. Take a look at his reply to me in this thread and tell me he's not disingenuous. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 01:38 PM |
| 0 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBi**Pretending that men won't lose their right to vote*** due to conviction for a refusal to register for the draft... At what point did anyone make that claim? Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. Hmmmm, let me think now.... oh now I remember, it was you in the fricken title to this post. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 01:33 PM |
| 4 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiBeing in jail after being convicted of not registering will in all states but Maine and Vermont prohibit you from voting. In Virginia you lose the ability to vote permanently upon being convicted of a felony. Some states you can't vote even while on probation or parole. Pretending that men won't lose their right to vote due to conviction for a refusal to register for the draft is, at best, disingenuous. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 07:18 AM |
| 1 | Let's get this through our heads, people, Amerikan men DO NOT have to register for the draft to be able to vote. This is a fallacy that makes us look like fools, most recently in an article by JudgyBiIt's not among the stated penalties but it is very much a consequence for most men who are convicted of failure to register. Failing to register is a felony conviction. In some states a felony conviction is enough to keep you from ever voting, in others you can regain your right to vote after a certain amount of time. In all states but Maine and Vermont a prisoner cannot vote. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/14 07:10 AM |
| 1 | Dystopia for men: Californian law will allow public colleges to require an active and "ongoing yes" to consent to sex in the form of "a nod of the head or moving closer to the person". Anything else is rape....assumes whoever prosecutes doesnt laugh it off or hide it under the rug, and no college admin wants another rape on the yearly crime list they send out to students. Tough shit for the colleges. Some are already in trouble with the feds for cooking the books by not reporting all sexual assaults. If the fed or the state doesn't get them the "victim" can sue the shit out of them for not complying with the law. No, colleges are not going to laugh off these reports. ...this cant be enforced as nob… | /r/TheRedPill | 11/08/14 07:49 PM |
| 2 | Dystopia for men: Californian law will allow public colleges to require an active and "ongoing yes" to consent to sex in the form of "a nod of the head or moving closer to the person". Anything else is rape.This law can be easily enforced. The only enforcement required by this law is to ensure that colleges adhere to the affirmative consent standard when prosecuting people. What this law does is make sexual contact between college students illegal. Under affirmative consent the "victim" only has to show that sex occurred. It's then up to the "perpetrator" to prove that they had consent to engage in sexual activity with the "victim". Of course this is close to impossible to prove so the "perpetrator… | /r/TheRedPill | 11/08/14 06:45 PM |
| 6 | Come on, guys, it's totally ironicalThe bit you quoted is conflating women and feminists. Perhaps the Zimmerman quote might be interpreted that way, but taken as a whole, I believe the article is very clear. 'Ironic misandry' serves a dual purpose. To deflect criticism of feminism/feminists from both inside and outside the movement, and to act as a way to build solidarity within feminism. The first point is pretty straight forward, but the second purpose is more interesting. Once you have a group of 'ironic misandrists' talking qu… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/14 10:41 PM |
| 15 | Come on, guys, it's totally ironicalAnd by squarely targeting anti-feminists, ironic misandry avoids dwelling on what feminists themselves are doing right or wrong. As Zimmerman puts it, it allows women to criticize “patriarchal ideals without also shitting on your fellow gal-identified types.” In other words, it's a thin shell of ironic misandry meant to deflect criticism, from both outside as well as inside the ideology, of the deep-seated misandry inherent in feminism. EDIT: Clarity | /r/MensRights | 08/08/14 07:35 PM |
| 1 | Humanitarian blue piller realizes he's been cuckolded.First of all, you've dodged the question. Ethiopia doesn't conform to your "rule". It has been receiving continuous food relief since the mid '80s and has grown to triple the population. It still can't feed itself and with the coming famine is going to require even more aid to be viable. Second, the link you gave only looks at one aspect of population growth. Your article claims that women have less children as child mortality decreases. That's fine and all but it doesn't answer the question. Th… | /r/TheRedPill | 06/08/14 01:30 AM |
| 4 | Humanitarian blue piller realizes he's been cuckolded....population reaches a natural limit then begins to fall. Really? When's Ethiopia's population going to fall? Thanks in part to western intervention in the mid '80s Ethiopia's population continued to grow throughout the famine from about 30 Million to the present high of somewhere around 100 million. They're still subsistence farmers, they haven't advanced themselves much beyond where they were in the '80s and they're facing famine again. Only now they've got more than triple the population to … | /r/TheRedPill | 06/08/14 12:27 AM |
| 6 | 35 PRACTICAL STEPS MEN CAN TAKE TO SUPPORT FEMINISMOne practical step to become a horrible person: Read the linked article and do what it tells you | /r/MensRights | 05/08/14 06:53 AM |
| 12 | A Woman Wore A Hidden Camera To Show How Many Times In A Day She Gets Harassed.This is like the third time I've seen this video posted to Reddit and every time it gets a dramatic, and ultimately deceptive, title. This is not really a hidden camera video about street harassment. This is a video of women complaining about street harassment with some slow-mo video clips of guys turning to look at attractive women. If you're the type of person that believes every word that comes from a womyn's mouth then yes, this video would probably convince you that a womyn's life is put in… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/14 05:35 AM |
| 10 | No means no, Feminists.If you can't see the individuals that comprise a movement as just that -- individuals, then you might be guilty of the same crime of which you accuse the evil "feminists". I see the individuals that comprise feminism. I see them as people that looked at what feminism had already done and said to themselves "I want to be associated with that!". They apparently thought that lobbying against presumed equal custody was grand, that lowering the standard for conviction for sexual assault on college ca… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/14 05:47 AM |
| 25 | No means no, Feminists.Feminism is as feminism does. Let's look at some of the accomplishments of feminism and see if they've been detrimental to the rights of men. Universal suffrage for women, conditional suffrage for men Outlawed FGM, dropped the ball when it came to MGM (some feminists even argue for MGM on the grounds that it helps protect women) Tender years doctrine for women, child support for men Debtors prisons re-instituted for men Abortion for women, child support for men Duluth model of DV = innocent men … | /r/MensRights | 26/07/14 05:00 AM |
| 10 | No means no, Feminists.Lumping them all into one category is the same thing as saying that all MRA's are misogynists. Not really. Unlike the MRM, feminism has a record of accomplishments to be critiqued. That record does not show that feminism advocates for gender equality. The MRM tried to get presumed 50/50 custody enacted into law. Was that misogynistic? Was it an example of gender equality when NOW successfully lobbied against it? | /r/MensRights | 26/07/14 04:37 AM |
| 0 | [Discussion] Where does the Mens Rights Movement (or you) stand on discrimination against male homosexuals/ men who embody traits generally percieved as feminine?I don't believe that feminism tries to tear down masculine men. That's probably because you view feminism as a movement for equality. If you go by what feminists claim to be, it's easy to think that the movement is an unqualified positive. I look at what they accomplish instead. Unfortunately, equality feminists aren't the ones making the laws/policies. Equality feminists wouldn't: 1) Spread the lie that the gender wage gap is due to misogyny 2) Spread the lie that DV is gendered (male=perpetrat… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/14 05:09 AM |
| 3 | [Discussion] Where does the Mens Rights Movement (or you) stand on discrimination against male homosexuals/ men who embody traits generally percieved as feminine?They are actively fighting the macho culture that hems men in. To be honest I view this as part of the problem. Instead of promoting the acceptance of feminine men, feminism tries to tear down masculine men. They teach the concept of 'toxic masculinity' where they pick some trait like aggression and assign all the bad parts to the masculine gender. Women are ambitious but men are violent, women speak up for themselves but men monopolize the conversation, women are competitive but men just enjoy … | /r/MensRights | 13/07/14 11:24 PM |
| 10 | What do you guys think of circumcision?Male circumcision became popular as a way to control men's sexual urges. It was believed that by traumatizing a child by mutilating his penis he would experience reduced sexual pleasure. John Harvey Kellogg (yes, that Kellogg) concerning stopping masturbation: A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anæsthetic, as the brief pain attending the … | /r/MensRights | 04/07/14 03:33 PM |
| 1 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?As to your first point, it seems you're saying that because money is fungible it can't be accounted for and I just don't get that. The custodial parent has a pot of money that's to be set aside for the kids. Ideally the custodial parent and the non-custodial parent contribute equally to this pot, but we know that's most likely not going to happen. Regardless, the custodial parent must spend all the money set aside for child support on the children alone. People do this sort of thing for taxes al… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 06:48 AM |
| 1 | California Bill to Turn Consensual Sex Into Rape?Probably the one bringing forward allegations second will be viewed as retaliatory and thus probably guilty. They only have to meet "a preponderance of the evidence" standard to determine guilt so it's not like it has to be really clear cut. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 04:25 AM |
| 1 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?I agree in general. The problem becomes who manages the pooled funds. If the state does it it'll be full of inefficiencies and I can see a lot of the money wasted on overhead. If either parent manages it I can see them abusing the money for their own personal needs rather than reserving it for the children. That's why I suggest that the custodial parent must prove that any child support is actually spent on the child. | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 03:28 AM |
| 3 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?I would argue that the fungibility of money makes no difference at all. It's not like the custodial parent gets one huge check at the end of the month with all their earned money plus the child support mixed in. They have their money, then they have a check for child support. All that needs to be done is ensure that all the money received for child support is spent on the children. It's really simple. Deciding what the "needs" of the child are is incredibly difficult. How much "watering" does it… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 03:18 AM |
| 2 | California Bill to Turn Consensual Sex Into Rape?Not quite. Rape/sexual assault ordinarily requires the prosecution/accuser to prove 2 things, 1. Sexual activity occurred, and 2. it occurred without consent. This bill would assume that if sexual activity occurred that the initiator of the sexual activity, by default, did not have consent. This means two different things have to be proven, 1. sexual activity occurred, 2. the defendant initiated the sexual activity. The defendant could attempt to show that they weren't the initiator of the sex (… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 02:50 AM |
| 3 | California Bill to Turn Consensual Sex Into Rape?It is the responsibility of the person initiating the sexual activity to ensure that he or she has the consent of the other person to engage in the sexual activity. Quoted from the text of the bill, strikeouts removed, my emphasis. In any administrative actions concerning sexual activity only the initiator is assumed to automatically be guilty of rape/sexual assault. Since males are generally assumed to be the initiators of sex, in practice this means that only a male must prove consent in the e… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 02:06 AM |
| 1 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?...cause one to look for ways to spend additional monies to justify current levels of support or to justify an increase That's already built into the current model of child support (in the U.S.). The states get a 'kickback' from the federal government proportionate to the amount of child support collected, even more for overdue child support collected. I admit my suggestion doesn't cure all the problems with child support, but it would stop custodial parents from stealing the money that should g… | /r/MensRights | 17/06/14 01:51 AM |
| 3 | California Bill to Turn Consensual Sex Into Rape?Here's a link to the proposed bill. And here's the part of the text that makes sexual activity a crime by default: It is the responsibility of the person who wants to engage in initiating the sexual activity to ensure that he or she has the consent of the other person to engage in the sexual activity. Now many people will say "Hey, people need to get consent anyway, sex without consent is rape!" and to those people I would say, "You're absolutely correct". However, what this bill does is remove … | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 11:56 PM |
| 1 | Boys are less mature than girls, but men are more mature than women?Sarcasm, do you understand it? Does the conclusion that men are more mature than women sound offensive? Does it sound unnecessary as a central discussion point in the pursuit of workplace equality? I hope so. Now let’s get to what this is really about. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 10:18 PM |
| 3 | Boys are less mature than girls, but men are more mature than women?A lot of the article was sarcasm to make a point. Here's a hint from the article: Does the conclusion that men are more mature than women sound offensive? Does it sound unnecessary as a central discussion point in the pursuit of workplace equality? I hope so. Now let’s get to what this is really about. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 10:17 PM |
| 3 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?This creates an incentive to reduce the standard of living and spend less than child support would entitle the kid to. Any incentive to reduce the standard of living and spend less money than the child is entitled to is countered by the state enforcing payment from the non-custodial parent and enforcing accountability from the custodial parent. Either way you cut it, neither parent is going to get away with reducing payments for the child. ...a LOT of audits have to happen... Not really. The sta… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 09:27 PM |
| 7 | Russell Simmons as well as other rap moguls can expect to pay ~$10,000/month for child support. Do you really need $120k/year to raise a child?...I don't think dismantling a system entirely is the panacea for abuse. I'm with you. Instead of dismantling the whole system I think the recipient of child support should, once a year, have to account for all the money they received and prove, through receipts etc., that it was all spent on the children. If some of it was spent on something that benefits the parent as well, e.g. housing, the custodial parent must pay the non-custodial parent a fair rental value. Should the *custodial parent be… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 08:21 PM |
| 4 | The Peter Pan Syndrome? What is that called for women? Oh wait, there is no name for that....(x-post from r/maine)...it assumes that low status women are by-and-large more beautiful than high status women. I don't know anyone who would seriously dispute that younger women are generally more appealing to men than older women. That being the case, a high status woman is likely to be older than her low status competition simply because she spent her youth achieving wealth/status. ...It still puts the blame onto men for why women can't find partners... The article may do that, but it's really the result of both… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/14 04:23 AM |
| 3 | The Peter Pan Syndrome? What is that called for women? Oh wait, there is no name for that....(x-post from r/maine)...shouldn't it stand to reason that there would be more affluent men than women? Yes, I believe that's what the statistics show. But you also have to bear in mind that most men have no problem marrying "down". In general, neither a woman's wealth nor her social status are considered attractive to a man. Thus it's likely many high status/high wealth men are going to be married to low status/low wealth women who are likely to be more beautiful, younger, and more fertile than a high status/high we… | /r/MensRights | 13/06/14 02:03 AM |
| 22 | The Peter Pan Syndrome? What is that called for women? Oh wait, there is no name for that....(x-post from r/maine)Money line from the article right here: Being a man doesn’t mean you get to do whatever you want So if I'm not supposed to be doing what I want what should I be doing? What you want? Because society revolves around you? Holy crap, the lack of introspection in articles like this blows my mind. This line's also good: That means that when women get married — if they get married — they have a strong probability of marrying down. O.M.G. I do not know how the poor, fragile creatures will cope with hav… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/14 11:52 PM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."'You are a sad man' the alpha male thought to herself as she anxiously watched the battery power indicator on her disability scooter rapidly drain. Accompanied by the high pitched whine of the scooter's motor she mentally berated herself for her poor performance. 'I could have done better' she thought, 'if only I had known they wouldn't fall for my fake phallus trick!'. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 11:58 AM |
| 5 | Title IX: Man’s Best Friend?I especially like the part where Ms. Riga abruptly shifts gears in the 5th paragraph. The reader can almost see the point at which the feminist demons take control of her and cause her to start spewing utter drivel. Also she's apparently unaware that "reverse discrimination" doesn't describe a real concept, a point which I found exquisitely amusing. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 04:18 AM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."It was time for a last desperate move the alpha male decided. In a move reminiscent of "Basic Instinct" (if Sharon Stone were 300+ pounds heavier) she slowly uncrossed, then recrossed her legs giving ample time for her audience to catch a glimpse of the "Backdoor Mutilator 9000" strapped to her groin. It was the best pegging rig the stolen money from her mother's purse could buy. Although, now that she thought about it, maybe going with the jet black model hadn't been the smartest move. It didn'… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 03:31 AM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man.""Are you still unconvinced?" the alpha male asked as she combed the neckbeard sloppily pasted to her triple chins. "Have I not convinced you I am a fellow male with the way I hate masculinity like those most masculine of rad-fems do?" she wheezed, out of breath from the exertion of talking so long. "Surely the way I supplicate the ham-beasts of TheBluePill convinced you of my good judgement, which I'm sure you'll agree is a defining alpha male trait" she gurgled. "For who among us men does not e… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 02:15 AM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man.""I am better at life than you." moaned the alpha male unconvincingly as she stuffed chocolate covered doughnut holes in her cavernous maw. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 01:28 AM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."'I don't know how much longer I can keep this up.' the alpha male thought as she adjusted her neckbeard-and-fedora disguise for what seemed to be the millionth time, 'the wisest minds back at TheBluePill assured me that this disguise would be impenetrable, that I'd fit right in'. The alpha male sobbed softly to herself in quiet desperation, frantically seeking a way in. 'Once more couldn't hurt' she thought, 'I'll try the shaming thing again'. "All the real men I know agree with me that masculin… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 12:01 AM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man.""Why won't you accept me?" the alpha male whined. "No really bros, I'm totally an alpha male, just look at all these pics that could be of anyone." he pleaded. 'Perhaps if I attempt to insult him he'll accept me as who I claim to be' the alpha male thought, not realizing that being insulted by someone who frequents TheBluePill is impossible. "Don't you see how much better a man you'd be if you'd only listen to middle-aged women who have failed at life so hard no one wants to be around them?" the… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/14 06:40 PM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."Uhm... I think I am as 'alpha' as they come haha. I'm sorry, I burst out laughing when I read this line. No one, and I mean absolutely no one, who scrounges for asspats in TheBluePill like you do should consider themselves 'alpha'. The sentence "The alpha male entreated the omega males and sub-par females to accept him as one of their own." doesn't make sense but it is an apt description of what you'd have me believe. Since your crumbling charade is starting to make me cringe with empathetic emb… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/14 06:08 PM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."The first is a classic alpha male teaching, 'you're entitled to nothing, you must fight for everything you want'. The second is a classic feminist teaching 'males are taught that they're entitled, to female attention, to love, and most of all to women's bodies'. Yet you've attributed both of these things to toxic alpha masculinity. Because they are. You're going to seriously argue that two things that are exactly opposite each other are 'classic alpha teachings'? Is an alpha male entitled to wom… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/14 04:43 PM |
| 1 | Stefan Molyneux is dangerous (we should not associate with this man)Not necessarily. I'll admit I found it a bit weird that you'd been a redditor for over 4 years and yet only posts from the past 24 hours show up when looking at your history. But maybe you'd just scrubbed your back history because you were sick of looking at it. Maybe you've been a lurker for 4+years and only now decided to start posting. Maybe you're paranoid that someone will track you down through your past posts. I don't know. Whatever the case, this is a hit piece on Molyneux that you poste… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/14 02:46 PM |
| 1 | These stats look a bit fishy to me...thoughts?The graphic starts out with a lie, "OUT OF EVERY 100 RAPES". What it should say but doesn't is 'Out of every 100 events that we are calling rapes but are actually some number less than 100 because we know for sure at least some of them are false accusations (although we don't know for sure how many, it could be only a tiny portion or it could be nearly all of them we just don't know)'. And it ends with a lie as well "THE OTHER 97 WILL WALK FREE". If it were more accurate it would say, 'Even assu… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/14 07:06 AM |
| 7 | Stefan Molyneux is dangerous (we should not associate with this man)Very compelling video... until you go to "FDR Liberated" and realize the man who did the video has an agenda. Right off the bat you see an article entitled "Stefan Molyneux—Misogyny or Marketing?". Why does he call Stefan a misogynist? Well Stefan doesn't like feminism very much, he's a libertarian and he believes "Feminism is Socialism in panties". Yes, he dared to point out the Marxist roots of modern feminists and this guy calls him a misogynist for it. I encourage everyone to examine both Mo… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/14 05:14 AM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."Hmmmm, weird. If all you meant to do is complain about how you were raised and suggest that all men don't fit the masculine mold then statements like: This 'Alpha' mentality that men like my father try to instill in young boys is destructive and counterproductive to society as a whole. certainly don't help get that message across. What that sentence says, in very clear terms, is that you believe masculinity is toxic. If you believe boys must not be raised to be masculine (because it's counterpro… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/14 04:40 PM |
| 3 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."While the article you posted isn't really a new idea to me it does raise some questions. First, why should anyone listen to this guy? I mean I get the fact that (from his perspective) his father was an asshole but that doesn't mean that the opposite way of raising a boy is the greatest. Just because the father might not have been a very good teacher doesn't mean that the lessons weren't worth learning. He seems to be pushing an "anti-masculine" approach to raising boys and I have to wonder, what… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 07:25 PM |
| 1 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."Yeah, a surprising number of people that post in SRS subs are banned from SRS-prime. Anyway, be safe out here, I've heard that exposure to new ideas can be scary for some people. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 06:56 PM |
| 2 | Breaking the Boy: The twisting and turning of trying to raise a boy to be a "real man."Aren't you afraid of being banned from SRS for posting here? | /r/MensRights | 05/06/14 06:01 PM |
| 1 | Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: Applying The Wrong Legal Standard To Establishing Consent in Rape CaseYou and I agree on this point. It's not enforced equally now, there's no way it will be enforced equally in the world the author envisions. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/14 01:06 AM |
| 1 | Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: Applying The Wrong Legal Standard To Establishing Consent in Rape CaseMany feminists do argue this. This author does not. At one point (s)he says "If the defense wants to argue that the plaintiff was into anonymous gay S&M bottle sex..." as part of an example supporting their argument. This could be female/female or male/male rape that they are describing, it seems to have been left deliberately vague. This author might not have thought ahead and realized they were arguing for the criminalization of all sex. In fact, it's a good bet that there wasn't much thought … | /r/MensRights | 02/06/14 01:01 AM |
| 2 | Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: Applying The Wrong Legal Standard To Establishing Consent in Rape CaseNo it just criminalizes male sexuality. That may be the authors intent but in actuality they are advocating making all sex equivalent to rape. Their position is: Sex without consent = rape Sex (by default) is without consent Sex (by default) = rape They prettied it up by not actually saying this, but this is where the chain of logic leads you. Although the author's intent may have been to criminalize only male sexuality, if implemented, their 'solution' would also criminalize female sexuality. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 08:10 PM |
| 2 | Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: Applying The Wrong Legal Standard To Establishing Consent in Rape CaseWhat this author is saying is that we should outlaw sex. That when people have sex the act of sex is always illegal unless a standard of proof is met that consent was given. Since consent is ongoing throughout the act and may be withdrawn at any time this would require the video taping of every sexual encounter using a video medium that could not be tampered with. It's an absurd proposition. | /r/MensRights | 01/06/14 04:22 PM |
| 2 | This article is one of the most misandric pieces of shit that Ive ever read! I'm steamed. Sure, the author is mostly quoting from the study but the study's sample size was only sixty-four males! That'Now that I think about it, it could be someone with a religious agenda as well. (I'm assuming that you meant that it's both misandry and a sex-negative agenda) | /r/MensRights | 31/05/14 04:14 AM |
| 4 | Does anyone know anything about this event that was (supposedly) planned by CAFE and then cancelled?CAFE still lists the event on their site. I read this article but I didn't see, other than in the title, where it said the event was cancelled. Perhaps the title was meant to be a veiled threat of some kind, I don't know. In any case this guy is a great example of Poe's Law. Is he really serious when he says: Incidentally, I’m a little troubled to find out that the version of Microsoft Word I’m typing in, like, right now no longer flags “misandry” as a non-word, despite it referring only to an i… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/14 02:15 AM |
| 2 | This article is one of the most misandric pieces of shit that Ive ever read! I'm steamed. Sure, the author is mostly quoting from the study but the study's sample size was only sixty-four males! That'I don't agree with you about the article being an example of misandry. It seems more like a hit piece from a sex-negative feminist against pornography. That being said the article was absolute crap, not necessarily because of the sample size but because the science done is unable to draw any definitive conclusions. From the summary (emphasis mine): ...lower functional connectivity of the right caudate to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex could reflect change in neural plasticity as a conse… | /r/MensRights | 31/05/14 01:33 AM |
| 0 | The men fighting for the right to wear skirts "We're fighting against prejudice and cliches. Women fought for trousers; we're doing the same with the skirt."I'm pretty sure OP is male, since they moderate a couple brony subs, in any case I'm in no position to shut down their speech nor would I if I could. I simply gave out a warning that they were probably disingenuous and they affirmed my opinion of their motives. They posted the same thing to the ainbow and lgbt subs. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 11:09 PM |
| 1 | The men fighting for the right to wear skirts "We're fighting against prejudice and cliches. Women fought for trousers; we're doing the same with the skirt."The high road doesn't involve excluding people because of their history... True, sometimes people change. ...or beliefs. Hmmm, not sure letting bigots operate under the MRM banner is the best thing for the movement. In any case the OP was doing what they were doing to make MensRights look bad. They posted the same thing in the ainbow and lgbt subs. As I pointed out, if you had bothered to check their history you'd have seen that they are virulently anti-male. The probability that they were posti… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 11:03 PM |
| 1 | The men fighting for the right to wear skirts "We're fighting against prejudice and cliches. Women fought for trousers; we're doing the same with the skirt."It is a potential problem. Potential no more. They got what they wanted. They posted much the same in the ainbow and lgbt subs. | /r/MensRights | 30/05/14 01:00 AM |
| 2 | The men fighting for the right to wear skirts "We're fighting against prejudice and cliches. Women fought for trousers; we're doing the same with the skirt."Yes, the message of tolerance they posted fits here. The person who posted it however is a bigot who hates masculinity. I can understand not wanting to take the time to go through someone's posting history but just a short look will tell you that this person hates everything about men. There is, in my opinion, no way this person is posting here in good faith, hence the warning. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 10:28 PM |
| 0 | The men fighting for the right to wear skirts "We're fighting against prejudice and cliches. Women fought for trousers; we're doing the same with the skirt."Well, if they post an article essentially saying that... They have said that in other posts, just not on this sub. This person is a bigot who hates masculinity. All you have to do is look at their post history to see what they think of you. Then ask yourself why this person would be posting here in good faith. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 10:18 PM |
| 2 | These 7 states are refusing to crack down on prison rape. "No one should be subjected to sexual abuse while in the custody of our justice system. It serves as a violation of fundamental rights, an attack on human dignity and runs contrary to everything we stand for as a nation."This is a political hit piece. It could just as easily be titled "7 GOP Governors attempt to crack down on prison rape. Obama administration refuses to stop obstructing progress." If you read the third paragraph under the assumption that the governors aren't lying dirtbags the whole tone of the article changes. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 09:02 PM |
| 0 | The men fighting for the right to wear skirts "We're fighting against prejudice and cliches. Women fought for trousers; we're doing the same with the skirt."Given their history the message I'm seeing is: "Masculine males are toxic to society, the only good male is a feminized one. If MRAs want to be good men they should learn to be more like women." Do you really think an individual who thinks that way can be anything but detrimental to the MRM? | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 08:49 PM |
| -2 | The men fighting for the right to wear skirts "We're fighting against prejudice and cliches. Women fought for trousers; we're doing the same with the skirt."I don't mind too much where a person comes from, just what messages they hold when they shout down from their soapbox. And that's my point. Where this individual has been posting doesn't really matter so much as what. This person is poison, they have expressed their belief in patriarchy theory and rape culture and they are of the opinion that masculinity is toxic to society. Why would such a person post on a men's rights forum.. to help? Don't make me laugh. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 08:41 PM |
| 2 | Young children already buy into gender stereotypes to explain behavior in fairy tales- Fairy tales — from which Disney movies are often derived — play a “powerful” role in shaping children’s perspectiLOL, you believe in the Patriarchy and Rape Culture. You believe Eliot Rodgers wasn't crazy, he was raised to be a woman-killer by the patriarchy. You're about as pro-mens-rights as Valerie Solanas. Is it really a witch hunt mentality to notice that a person that posts to AgainstMensRights submits somewhere in the neighborhood of 9 posts within a matter of minutes to the MensRights sub? Subverting gender roles is at the core of men's rights. I'd actually dispute that. If you look at the issues, … | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:45 PM |
| 1 | Is There Such a Thing as a 'Masculine' Way to Ride a Bike?Potential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:11 PM |
| 2 | The men fighting for the right to wear skirts "We're fighting against prejudice and cliches. Women fought for trousers; we're doing the same with the skirt."Potential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:10 PM |
| 0 | How to Be a Man: Redefining Masculinity - Men who are seen as effeminate are often mocked. Adam Carter, a second-year student in the University of Virginia nursing school, started out as the only malePotential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:10 PM |
| 2 | Men are men—whether they're transgender or otherwise "I’m attracted to men. Trans men are men. Ergo, it’s not at all weird for me to be attracted to a trans man. Sexual expression and gender identity,Potential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:10 PM |
| 1 | Man up, don’t be afraid to cry - Men are under pressure to not show their emotions, but it's a good thing to shed tears on occasion "We've been culturally conditioned to think that crying is a sign ofPotential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:09 PM |
| 6 | Have we finally learnt to accept transvestites? - As transvestite Conchita Wurst wins Eurovision, Patrick McAleenan asks whether this was also a meaningful victory for men who like to dress as womenPotential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:09 PM |
| 2 | Feldberg: Cross-dressing has big impact on Tony Awards- This past Broadway year, though, saw an unusual flowering of the form, going well beyond the simple man-in-dress laugh trigger. The line between masculine and feminine can be wavy, and highly variable from one person to the next.Potential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:09 PM |
| 3 | Young children already buy into gender stereotypes to explain behavior in fairy tales- Fairy tales — from which Disney movies are often derived — play a “powerful” role in shaping children’s perspectiPotential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:08 PM |
| 3 | Striking Photos Of Muay Thai Boxers Capture The Softer Side Of MasculinityPotential false flag post. Please check /u/DerpyGrooves posting history before replying. (S)he posts in many "feminist" subs including AgainstMensRights and seems to be trying to flood MensRights with cross-dressing articles for some reason. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 05:08 PM |
| 3 | MRA's sure do talk about the Friend Zone a lot.You mean, they don't let you play in SRSPrime anymore. You're all over AgainstMensRights, SRD, and FRDBroke, all SRS subs. Just checking to make sure you weren't lost. I know how fragile you guys are outside your safe spaces. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 04:29 PM |
| 3 | MRA's sure do talk about the Friend Zone a lot.Are you lost? This isn't SRS or AgainstMensRights. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 04:13 PM |
| 1 | Daytime TV Host Wendy Williams advocates tricking men into unwanted pregnancies, on TV.Thanks much. | /r/MensRights | 24/05/14 11:30 PM |
| 1 | How to deal with the campus sexual assault crisisAh, another article written by a fool celebrating the increasing irrelevance of the justice system. I'm sick of these Judas goats pretending that the government bypassing the judicial system is something to be applauded. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/14 10:25 PM |
| 1 | I'm disappointed.I'm sure that didn't happen. If a user of mensrights posted there they found it on their own. Just because you dislike mensrights is no reason to claim (without having any proof) that a brigade happened. I'm sure /u/DualPollux was just having a bit of a goof. If you ask him about SRS and brigading I'm positive that he'll assure you that it doesn't happen because SRS has a rule against it. And who would know better than him? He'll no doubt explain to you that when a comment's karma divebombs afte… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/14 03:44 PM |
| 1 | I'm disappointed.In any case, mensrights uses np links so I'm sure what you experienced was simply organic voting. This sub can hardly be blamed for the unpopularity of your post. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/14 03:07 PM |
| 1 | I'm disappointed.Weird, I thought you SRSters didn't care about free speech or imaginary internet points. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/14 04:49 AM |
| 3 | Here's 100 Years of Proof That Girls Are Better Students Than BoysIf you define the term "better students" to mean "people who are marked highly on classwork/homework but don't do as well when their knowledge is objectively measured through testing", then the headline is perfectly accurate. These articles are such junk... | /r/MensRights | 01/05/14 06:26 PM |
| 1 | The Gender Trap: The Problem of Raising Boys As WarriorsTL;DR: As a feminist I feel that men need to express their masculinity in accordance with the ideal that is femininity. If men would just rid themselves of their "toxic masculinity" and become gay develop romantic friendships with each other the world would be a nicer place. Edit: In case it wasn't clear, the TL;DR is a summary of the article itself, it is not an encapsulation of my own opinions on masculinity. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/14 06:16 PM |
| 1 | Daytime TV Host Wendy Williams advocates tricking men into unwanted pregnancies, on TV.Elliott Hulse? | /r/MensRights | 26/04/14 05:11 PM |
| 0 | "BF has been pulling redpill crap..." in /r/offmychestSure, I'd guess the vast majority of subs aren't SRS. /r/creepyPMs is one of theirs though, as are /r/badhistory and /r/badlinguistics . If you really want to know get RES and start tagging. | /r/TheRedPill | 25/04/14 02:01 AM |
| 1 | "BF has been pulling redpill crap..." in /r/offmychestThere's a browser addon called Reddit Enhancement Suite wherein you can mark usernames with a tag. There's also various tools out there that will allow you to mass tag people. /r/SRSsucks has a link in their sidebar for such a tool that tags all the people that post in SRS, and those that mod the SRS subs. This allows me to tell you with certainty that (as of the last tag update) /u/TheYellowRose is a mod of SRSPoC, /u/TheIdesOfLight is a mod of TheBluePill, and /u/mMelatonin is a mod for SRSMai… | /r/TheRedPill | 25/04/14 01:37 AM |
| 2 | "BF has been pulling redpill crap..." in /r/offmychestAt least 8 SRSters as mods, 3 of them being mods of other SRS subs. Might as well mourn the loss of a sub you enjoyed and move on. | /r/TheRedPill | 25/04/14 01:02 AM |
| 1 | Do any MRAs acknowledge that men have systemic privilege over women?Nice post, but unfortunately here's their definition of male privilege, For a rather simplified definition, male privilege = the social, economic, and political advantages that men receive on the basis of their gender, at the expense of women. so don't expect too much rational discourse. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/14 03:09 PM |
| 7 | Do any MRAs acknowledge that men have systemic privilege over women?I've yet to see a single MRA agree that male privilege exists. That's because when the term "male privilege" is used there's a whole other level of meaning other than the obvious. The term "male privilege" when talked about today means "male privilege that's completely unearned (and thus unfair) and much greater than any female privilege is now or has ever been in the past". This is why men will deny the concept of male privilege, because there's so much subtext to the term that most MRAs disagr… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/14 02:51 PM |
| 1 | Need help on clarifying the 2003 GAO report (Wage Gap)I did a quick search in this subreddit for the phrase "wage gap" (using the handy search tool provided by reddit) and almost immediately found a post with a good amount of resources including the 2009 CONSAD study done for the U.S. Department of Labor. Here is the post, have fun looking through it all. Sort by "best", the top post should be chock full of references. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/14 07:18 AM |
| 2 | Serious question: why is the Mens Rights Movement so opposed to feminism?LOL kragshot wasn't wrong though. I have you tagged as participating in SRS, AMR, and SRD. You're either troll or radfem, neither of which is interested in serious discussion. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 04:53 AM |
| 0 | Tumblr Delivers Pt. 2...and if you don't pay it long enough you can go to jail for unpaid taxes :/ There is no enforcement provisions for the "fine" in the health care law. If you arrange your withholding such that you don't overpay your taxes you can simply not pay the "fine". Since there is no enforcement provision they can neither punish you, nor force you to pay. Edit Quote from an article on the HC law. The law greatly limits how the IRS can collect the penalty. It cannot use liens or levies to collect it and t… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 09:21 PM |
| 4 | Why are feminists trying to turn Bill Cosby into a serial rapist?So many people came down on him for that speech. He was vilified by many, but the criticism just rolled off him. One of the great things about that speech is that the message is universal, it's good advice for any group. Abide by the law, use good communication skills, raise your kids to succeed, and don't blame your failures on others. What a great message. | /r/TheRedPill | 04/03/14 01:46 AM |
| 2 | Why are feminists trying to turn Bill Cosby into a serial rapist?Yeah, I think it's all they had though. No way there's any evidence for a real criminal indictment, might as well tarnish his reputation as much as possible. | /r/TheRedPill | 03/03/14 11:29 PM |
| 15 | Why are feminists trying to turn Bill Cosby into a serial rapist?Because Bill Cosby doesn't entirely buy the victim narrative that has been laid out for the black population by their liberal masters. He has, several times, called on the black community to work to improve their lot in life, emphasizing personal responsibility and hard work. Needless to say, this does not sit well with feminists. No feminist wants anyone to succeed through hard work and personal responsibility. Rather they should give up responsibility, give up agency, and let those who have bo… | /r/TheRedPill | 03/03/14 10:20 PM |
| 0 | Trauma recovery rationale behind don't blame the victim mantra, it's *not* some absurd campaign against personal safety.Go and research the meaning behind these things and you can find out for yourself. Ah, the good ol' "It's not my job to educate you shitlord!". Apparently it's also not your job to present any evidence that your point of view correlates to reality. Does the sheer absurdity of the idea of a movement against personal safety not tell you that you have your wires crossed? And here we have the classic feminist "failure to read what was written just one post before". I answered that in my previous pos… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/14 05:47 PM |
| 0 | Trauma recovery rationale behind don't blame the victim mantra, it's *not* some absurd campaign against personal safety.If they were against personal responsibility they would not advocate rape prevention tips that are a bit more useful than telling women not to drink, and advocate learning self defence. You have yet to present any evidence that any group running a "don't tell women to X, teach men not to rape" campaign actually offers any useful advice on how women can protect themselves. I'd be interested in seeing such a thing, because so far all I've found is articles advocating that women dump all personal r… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/14 05:22 PM |
| 1 | Trauma recovery rationale behind don't blame the victim mantra, it's *not* some absurd campaign against personal safety.You are taking about the sarcastic teach men not to rape meme. Ahhhhh I see, you believe that the "teach men not to rape" campaign was sarcasm! Alright, sarcasm is saying one thing and meaning the opposite so I guess the articles saying "Don't tell me to take a self defense class, teach men not to rape" mean "Tell me to take a self defense class, don't teach men not to rape"?! See, that's the problem with that campaign, if it's taken at face value it's telling women to take no responsibility for… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/14 04:58 PM |
| 1 | Trauma recovery rationale behind don't blame the victim mantra, it's *not* some absurd campaign against personal safety.I'm kicked out of the mrm if I don't pretend that there is an absurd movement against personal safety and totally misunderstand their their sarcastic memes. Who's sarcastic memes? I couldn't understand the point you were trying to make here. If its really an absurd movement against personal safety, then why are they teaching personal safety? They are? The same campaigns spouting "Don't tell women not to get drunk, teach men not to rape" are, at the same time, teaching women not to get drunk? The… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/14 04:42 PM |
| 2 | Trauma recovery rationale behind don't blame the victim mantra, it's *not* some absurd campaign against personal safety.Thats not a campaign to discourage women from taking precautions against being raped. Feminists are all about perception being reality. Take objectification of women for example. According to feminists women are shown in advertisements as "sex objects" this encourages women and those around them to view them only as sex objects. Likewise the "teach men not to rape" style of campaign portrays women as totally helpless. This must (at least according to feminists) lead to women acting totally helpl… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/14 04:15 PM |
| 2 | Trauma recovery rationale behind don't blame the victim mantra, it's *not* some absurd campaign against personal safety.So there's no campaigns that discourage women from taking precautions against being raped? Really? So if I go to Google and search for images of "teach men not to rape poster" I won't find a ridiculous number of posters all portraying women as helpless to prevent rape? If I search the writings of modern feminists I won't find long screeds on how "it's not up to women to protect themselves it's up to the men not to rape"? P.S. Definitely don't go to Google and look up anything about teaching men … | /r/MensRights | 03/03/14 04:00 PM |
| 1 | Interesting little blog entry showing how /r/theredpills version of reality is often the same as how the most extreme of sex negative radfems depict reality.OP is SRS, best to ignore them and be on your way. OP is a troll looking for ammo for their cause. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/14 12:22 AM |
| 0 | Are we really that bad?What's a genetic loser if his genes didn't doom him to becoming a loser? A genetic loser in the context in which I'm talking about it is a person who does not instinctually display the behaviors that a woman is attracted to. We know women are hypergamous, and will seek to mate with the best available. Which is better for a woman to mate with, a man who displays genetic fitness (and will thus pass on some of that fitness to his offspring) or a man who is able to fake his genetic fitness (and thus… | /r/TheRedPill | 26/02/14 06:06 AM |
| 7 | Are we really that bad?Yeah but men don't generally care. Shooting a bunch of sperm around isn't nearly as dangerous to a man as pregnancy is to a woman. You could theoretically impregnate every woman you encountered and their pregnancies wouldn't effect your survival at all. For this reason men never developed the deep visceral loathing of the sex act with an unsuitable mate. You wake up next to a whale after a night of drunken debauchery you don't run to the police station to file sexual abuse charges, you shrug and… | /r/TheRedPill | 26/02/14 05:20 AM |
| 46 | Are we really that bad?I honestly don't understand why some women react poorly to PUA, game, and the seduction community either. Women hate risk. Having children is risky business, a woman has to give up some of her resources to have children and to be pregnant is to be vulnerable. The worst sex-related outcome for a woman is to mate with a genetic loser. She will have put herself at great risk to bring into the world inferior humans. If you need to be taught not to be a loser (PUA, game, etc.) this means you are not … | /r/TheRedPill | 25/02/14 11:48 PM |
| 1 | Question regarding the idea of "financial abortion"These scenarios illustrate why it's better to have an opt-in system for potential fathers rather than a 'financial abortion'. Under an opt-in system none of these scenarios are troublesome. If the mother-to-be wants financial support for her child from one of the men in her life she simply has to convince one of them to opt-in to providing support. If she can't do so then she's out of luck and can then decide which of the myriad of other choices she wishes to take (abortion, adoption, sole paren… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/14 01:14 PM |
| 2 | Question: A thought about this subreddit"women are all greedy bitches who's only aim is to try to steal money from men and trick them by using their inability to distinguish between a woman who cares for them and a woman who has sex with them" Are you sure you didn't mean to post this in /r/TheRedPill ? Although the users of both subs are often characterized by feminists as neckbeard-having, fedora-wearing, virgin, losers it's important to craft your concern trolling appropriately depending on what board you're posting to. If you make… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/14 03:08 PM |
| 1 | Marrying The Red Pill and Feminism...you wouldn't say that somebody's choice to be vegetarian, paleo or pescetarian was down to their genetics, right? Not solely, but I believe that their genetic makeup has more influence in their decision than most people believe. Think about how many different aspects of the decision to change your diet would be controlled/influenced by your genes. Your IQ plays a part in the decision, that's largely genetic. Whether you're allergic to any substance in your current diet, your willingness to ad… | /r/TheRedPill | 23/01/14 02:30 PM |
| 1 | At the Red Pill's core is something pretty unoriginal...Apparently there is no relationship beyween breast size and milk production... This is incorrect. Breasts on a prepubescent girl are nonexistent/nonfunctional and grow larger/functional as she matures sexually. Larger breasts thus become a sign of sexual maturity. The same thing has occurred with other female characteristics. Long legs are seen as a desirable trait because girls who have just reached fertility have legs that are out of proportion (more length) to their body. Thus long legs on a … | /r/TheRedPill | 22/01/14 10:47 PM |
| 2 | Marrying The Red Pill and FeminismI am not going to bother arguing about biology, but why would you completely discount socioeconomic factors? It makes no logical/mathematical sense. (Italics added for emphasis) All too often social scientists examine an aspect of culture or society in isolation, as if biology has absolutely nothing to do with it. Biology informs everything we think and do. Nothing about a society (or an individual) can be wholly explained without biology. You cannot explain an aspect of a culture by pretending … | /r/TheRedPill | 22/01/14 10:01 PM |
| 1 | Marrying The Red Pill and FeminismI'm saying that alpha/beta/whatever is a social construct... The idea that anything is simply a social construct is a fallacy. Nothing ever can be; not gender, not sexual orientation, not intelligence, not propensity to violence, etc. There is always at least some biological influence, and to discount biology leads to an inaccurate grasp of reality. Look at it this way. We act the way we do because of the way we think. We think the way we do because of our brains. Our brains are formed the way t… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/01/14 08:45 PM |
| 1 | The Wage Gap: A ResponseYour argument becomes circular because it assumes the agent is always aware of their own bigotry, an assumption that is equivalent to saying they are not bigoted, which is the very thing the argument set out to prove in the first place. The argument would be an example of circular reasoning if only one company were under discussion. Instead of one company, the whole labor market is being discussed, and this means the argument being presented is one of probability, not an example of circular reas… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/14 06:25 PM |
| 14 | Nice comeback from my FB feed on circumcision...do not understand the need to clean under the foreskin. There is no need to clean under the foreskin until sometime after puberty. At birth the foreskin is actually fused to the glans, there is no "foreskin" per se, just another layer of skin over the glans. A circumcision is, in essence, a skinning of the glans of a newborn. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/14 01:40 PM |
| 32 | "Gender equality, yeah..." [Turn off annotations for best viewing experience]You do realize that she actually said, (when speaking of whether women should serve) "I think yes. But it should be optional, not compulsory like for the guys.", at which point her companion chimed in with "Gender equality!". In other words, girls should be allowed to work (at their discretion) in the same military where males are forced to work, and somehow this equals gender equality. Brilliant! | /r/MensRights | 22/12/13 04:52 PM |
| 2 | Can someone help me understand the 1 in 9 imprisonment statistic and how it's generated?Oddly enough the picture on the post you saw had a source on it, "Bonczar T. (2003) Prevalence of Imprisonment in the U.S. Population, 1974-2001". It's right there in the lower left of the graphic. A quick Google would direct you to this website where you can apparently download the source yourself for free. I didn't download it myself but at least you've got somewhere to start. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/13 01:11 PM |
| 2 | Trans* MRAsThere was something in the comments of this article about MRAs hating trans* people. Might have got a few people curious. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 11:27 PM |
| 2 | For the most part I like rationalWiki, but their page for mens rights is just a disgusting strawman attack trying to paint it as a women-hate movement (obviously written by an extreme feminist). Can we fix this?So the answer to my question is "No" then? Surely, you're setting up a false equivalency. What two (or more) things am I falsely equating? I'd strongly argue that the direction of the community's knee-jerk reaction in and of itself demonstrates a pretty clear attitude towards women. And we've circled around to you claiming a certain attitude is held by this community (hatred of women) and yet not providing any evidence of this attitude. Where's the examples of "...not-subtle-or-hidden woman-hati… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 04:05 AM |
| 0 | For the most part I like rationalWiki, but their page for mens rights is just a disgusting strawman attack trying to paint it as a women-hate movement (obviously written by an extreme feminist). Can we fix this?In order to demonstrate a hatred of women one would have to demonstrate that "ruining" an anonymous reporting form with false rape claims actually harmed/harms women and that such action was taken with the express purpose of harming women. Surely you have evidence of this? | /r/MensRights | 19/12/13 01:34 AM |
| 13 | TIL a psychologist in Denmark was suspended by his university for publishing a study that showed men have higher IQ than women, and was later vindicated by the scientific communityI'm not sure if it's true in all the states but at least in California there's a law against I.Q. testing of black children (in state schools) for any reason. This was the result of a lawsuit brought against the state because there was a disproportionate number of black children diagnosed as mentally retarded. I wouldn't be surprised if the lawsuit prompted other states (and perhaps private practices) to adopt similar policies even if they didn't make it a law. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/10/13 06:54 AM |
| 4 | (Classic Repost) Trappings of Power and other musings - how Women seek value from a source in declineSounds about right. I don't know that (as men) we'll ever understand exactly how women experience love but the evidence that they experience it much differently than us is everywhere. Are they just more pragmatic about it? Were men sold on romanticized love by society? Is it nature or is it nurture? So many unanswered questions and the answers are slow in coming. All we can do is to keep seeking, finding, and hopefully sharing that knowledge. | /r/TheRedPill | 24/09/13 06:52 PM |
| 3 | (Classic Repost) Trappings of Power and other musings - how Women seek value from a source in declineYes, powerful men are attractive to women because of women's risk aversion. By associating with a powerful man a woman can gain access to the rewards of the man's risky behavior while only experiencing a fraction of the risk. The man takes the risk, gains the reward, which he then shares with his female partner. The only risk the female experiences is the risk of losing the resources she didn't work for in the first place. This is why modern LTRs are so dangerous to men, it removes even this sma… | /r/TheRedPill | 24/09/13 04:11 PM |
| 9 | (Classic Repost) Trappings of Power and other musings - how Women seek value from a source in declineThe article points out how women invade spaces only after the real power has already left, yet it offers no explanation for this. I would postulate that power is dangerous/risky to hold. Women (being risk averse) will only intrude into an area of minimal danger, i.e. after the power has already left. If you're finding yourself having to defend your area of influence from the intrusion of women you're most likely already in a "safe space" (one without power) and you should probably look to move o… | /r/TheRedPill | 24/09/13 03:16 PM |
| 3 | Feminists DO care about male suffering.The article she cited stated that there was no noticeable decrease in sexual pleasure noted in circumcised vs. uncircumcised men. Is this true? I suspect it's true in the the short term. Long term there's likely to be some decrease in sensitivity. You'd have to look at the data of the studies to find out how they did them, but I suspect they measured sensitivity a short time after the circumcision had healed. Here's why time is such a factor. The glans of the penis is an internal organ. It's cov… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/13 03:40 PM |
| 2 | Do women and men need to find common ground on rape?The stats here are only for those arrested and convicted. The study in question is found here. The link is to the summary, the text is down below. If you read the text of the study you find that all the data was generated from questionnaires given to a sample of the populous, not taken from crime statistics. The DOJ considers "psychological coercion"... For the study in question, what the DOJ considers coercion/threats probably doesn't matter. A lot of these rape/sexual assault studies use a def… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/13 02:34 PM |
| 2 | Do women and men need to find common ground on rape?150 rapes per 1000 over the 1985-1995 period (we're already at %15) Did you just add 100 to the number of rapes in that line? 5/1000 * 10 years should come out to 50/1000, not 150/1000. This would reduce your final number to 92/1000 or 9.2%. Even that's an exaggeration because those stats include not only completed rape/sexual assault but also attempted and threatened. Then you run into the problem of definitions. How are they defining rape/sexual assault? If a women had one drink and then conse… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/13 03:48 AM |
| 15 | If companies actually did pay women less for equal work, why would they hire men at all?Let's assume someone is really trying to look for gender discrimination in pay. In order to do so they would first have to discount differences in pay that are not related to gender discrimination. Measuring yearly wage rather than hourly (or shorter) wage fails to do this. For example: Person A and person B both earn $20 per hour. Person A works 45 hours a week and person B works 35 hours per week. At the end of the year person A has earned more money than person B. Measuring the wage gap on th… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 04:21 PM |
| 3 | Most shocking federal policy yet: sexual harassment on campus is now defined by the accuser's subjective feelings, regardless of how irrational they might be...the policy still maintains that it is an objective question as to whether the 'harassment' creates a hostile environment. This is untrue, with documents like this you have to read the language very carefully. Quote: (emphasis mine) Whether conduct is objectively offensive is a factor used to determine if a hostile environment has been created... In other words it is one of several factors, one of which is going to be subjective since the letter states several times that the university must us… | /r/MensRights | 16/05/13 04:48 PM |
| 1 | Having your cake and eating it too?If women are naturally less competative, more fragile and all in all more girly, it would follow that they need special protection, from society and the law. This only makes sense if you define equality to mean equality of outcomes. If you believe equality means equal opportunity then there is no inconsistency. From another of your replies: I went to a school once, where you had to walk up about 7 flights of stairs to get to certain class rooms. Everybody groaned when we had classes there. There… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/13 09:08 PM |
| 2 | "If you believe patriarchy theory, then you believe all men are sociopaths."I deduced a long time ago that feminism was actually an abdication of female agency disguised as female advocacy. If you point this out in a discussion right away there seems to be a tendency for feminists to dismiss you out of hand or derail the discussion. I find it's better to just point out the "misogyny" inherent in the current issue and leave it up to the feminist to realize the extent of the problem. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/13 08:34 PM |
| 3 | "If you believe patriarchy theory, then you believe all men are sociopaths."On the other hand, women are always exclaiming that we educate them for nothing but vanity and coquetry, that we keep them amused with trifles that we may be their masters; we are responsible, so they say, for the faults we attribute to them. How silly! What have men to do with the education of girls? What is there to hinder their mothers educating them as they please? There are no colleges for girls; so much the better for them! Let's change his language to be more modern: On the other hand, wo… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/13 07:18 PM |
| 0 | Saw radical feminism for the first time yesterday...This is true for all groups. By identifying with a group, you give cover to the more extreme elements. I would disagree with this statement. The only time this would occur is if the more extreme elements in a movement were actually able to advance their cause(s). "Giving cover" is saying one thing and doing (or allowing others to do in your name) something completely different. For example, feminism presents itself as being for gender equality while working behind this facade to enact sexist leg… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/13 04:16 PM |
| 7 | Saw radical feminism for the first time yesterday......you are writing off feminism and women... Writing off feminism and writing off women are two different things. Feminism does not equal women. Even when "some poptart" tells you she cares, you refuse to see any good in it. This is not at all what was said, again you have confused a woman (the "poptart") with feminism. Here's what was actually said: And every time some poptart comes in here and tells us feminism cares about men... Notice that the complaint was about a woman (the "poptart") who … | /r/MensRights | 15/02/13 06:25 AM |
| 5 | "Forbes: Women Surpass Men In IQ". The media campaign against men and their gender escalates.If you know anything about IQ the only thing that you can say about this study is that it's (nearly) worthless. As has been pointed out, the study involves mostly individuals 15 - 18 years old. This is a worthless demographic to study IQ, but is the perfect population to "study" if you want some data to bash men with. Read up on IQ and you'll find that it is mostly determined by genetics. IQ cannot by trained (i.e. improved) in any significant way, unless the person is a child. Even after traini… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/12 02:54 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter