TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sniveling_Cur Archive

View 12 posts and 983 comments by Sniveling_Cur on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

Sniveling_Cur/r/BlackPillScience07/07/18 04:30 AM
23

Sniveling_Cur/r/BlackPillScience30/06/18 07:58 PM
12

Sniveling_Cur/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:07 PM
9

Sniveling_Cur/r/BlackPillScience02/07/18 01:06 PM
7

Sniveling_Cur/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/17 04:29 AM
6

Sniveling_Cur/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 06:04 PM
5

Sniveling_Cur/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:15 AM
3

CMVSniveling_Cur/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:51 AM
2

DiscussionSniveling_Cur/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 07:50 AM
2

Sniveling_Cur/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:08 AM
2

Sniveling_Cur/r/BlackPillScience10/06/18 06:50 PM
1

Sniveling_Cur/r/BlackPillScience10/06/18 07:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

but most of the other girls I know are dating someone and just want their happy future with them. I can't imagine their expectations being that high. And because you can't imagine something, it cannot be true? Is this really what the post is about? Anyway, everyone knows about 80/20 Tinder/OKCupid data. Everyone should know that statistic has been confirmed by multiple separate sources of data, like our DNA records, sexual behaviour of primitive human societes still in existence today, and even …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 07:43 AM
1

NAWALT(not all water is like that)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 07:36 AM
1

Is this a trick question? Female's social status absolutely doesn't matter. I'd literally pick a pretty hobo off the street and provide her with everything "if I could".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 06:23 AM
1

I am unwilling but do it anyway when prompted, because actually going through with it is social suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 06:19 AM
1

Most women don't orgasm via vaginal as well. One, how would she know if she's a virgin, and two, I'm betting most women do orgasm via vaginal - whatever the fuck that means - if they're actually fucking a guy they're sexually attracted to, not some beta "good lad" they've settled on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 06:17 AM
2

TRP explains the why.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 06:15 AM
1

Such as: Attractive people are more successful; oh, wait. Uhhh... Past findings of beauty premium and ugliness penalty may possibly be due to the fact that: 1) "very unattractive" and "unattractive" categories are usually collapsed into "below average" category; and 2) health, intelligence (as opposed to education) and Big Five personality factors are not controlled. It appears that more beautiful workers earn more, not because they are beautiful, but because they are healthier, more intelligent…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 06:13 AM
3

For the wedding. Women want the wedding, not the marriage. They want to be the center of everyone's attention, even just for one day, and fuck the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 06:07 AM
1

Of course it would, because men would still outcompete women. That's what patriarchy is: men outcompeting women and therefore ending with all the positions of status.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/17 05:47 AM
7

Isn't this just stealthy "everything men ever do, they do to get chicks" post? SPOILER: they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 05:13 PM
0

and the men that did choose who they married did not care about attractiveness. ...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 05:11 PM
1

DAE looking at their plone is literally worst than hitler???//
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 05:09 PM
2

With women having same financial opportunities as men marriage serves no purpose anymore and should be removed completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 06:28 AM
0

implying that attractiveness criteria change with culture You(and everyone seriously replying to your post) are literally not qualified enough to post on /r/purplepilldebate. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10825783
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 06:25 AM
1

AMALT is so much a thing that it's socially permittable to say it out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/17 07:04 AM
2

As incels like to put it, therapy is a meme. Talking to someone who is too stupid to understand high school math and therefore went to study psychology is not going to solve your problems. Unless they'll give you drugs. These won't solve your problems either, but you won't care about them as much. You won't care about anything as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/17 04:55 PM
1

What kind of radio archive site has no volume control? Other than that nitpick, good find!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/17 07:55 AM
2

I’ve responded to as many posts as I intend to on this thread. If anyone benefits from this advice, then glad to have helped. If anyone doesn't comprehend this advice How telling you don't even accept a possibility that your "advice" is fucking worthless. Your post is just more "Yeah you'll never be able to reproduce, the one and only thing you were born to do, but why can't you just paint pictures and become happy this way?" nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/17 07:51 AM
1

Your monkey brain would make you do it even without women present.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/17 07:49 AM
3

Speech is a thing, but it's disappearing because we invented text communication. This is literally you OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/17 11:11 AM
1

There is no "beta game" and "women want providers" is one of TRP's biggest bullshits.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/17 06:56 AM
2

What is there to explain? Killing 2 babies is twice as bad as killing one baby. You're trying to somehow wave away that simple fact with "well either way it's bad so let's not even talk about it".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/17 05:51 AM
1

Asking who which gender is "worse" for the action to cheating is the same asking if killing 2 babies is worse than killing 1 baby-- Yes, it is technically worse to kill 2 babies, but even if you killed 1 baby, you stilled killed a baby. Nice whataboutism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 03:05 PM
1

Really? Not "all the customers are fuckheads"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 08:22 PM
2

Maybe the men who use OKCupid are more likely to be ugly? Well, why don't only ugly women go to OKCupid then? Besides, things like female erotica also confirm it. Women want "the whole package".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 08:21 PM
4

And if I approach you on the street and ask you what time is it, I'm objectifying you as a clock. LOL you people, seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 04:07 AM
0

Never because customers "treat you like shit", no.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:39 AM
1

Big companies get dozens, sometimes hundreds of applications for 1 job, and plenty of those applicants are qualified. So how do they narrow it down? They pick the best one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:37 AM
4

Are you physically incapable of understanding arguments by comparison? Or arguments - in general?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:34 AM
0

Everyone does, but that's why a lot of people find these types of jobs inherently depressing and dehumanizing. First time hearing of it. Bosses objectify people all the time, but it makes them shitty bosses. I guess 100% of bosses are shitty then. How dare they hire and pay you based on your job competence instead of based on ~who you are as a person~!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:19 AM
16

And that's why "objectification" is horseshit. When I go to McDonald's, I "objectify" the cashier as a tool to take my money and give me the burger. No one fucking cares, no one writes moralizing posts about how I'm treating them like a burger dispenser. The idea of "objectification" is so retarded that there are even areas of life where we expect to be objectified. For example, if your boss suddenly starts asking you about your sex life, you would say that is not a professional behaviour. What …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 01:48 AM
1

And after time I saw that the incel subreddits are nothing but trash complaining and no real strategies to change The entire point of blackpill is that there are some things you cannot change. If you can't accept that go back to TRP "just try harder bro" cope, or bluepill "just wait, you will find someone eventually" cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 09:03 PM
1

I mean, are you being legit retarded or are you trolling me at this point? Yes, he was rich. He was filthy rich. Compared to the woman who married him.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 07:56 PM
1

So a large population of women fucks guys they aren't attracted to for money Don't put words in my mouth, especially if they're your words. lol what even is this convo?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 05:33 AM
1

That's their job.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 05:01 AM
1

Not when it requires them to have sex with someone they're not attracted to in the slightest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:53 AM
5

So every time a man has sex with a woman with makeup on, he is raped? Sky's the limit!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:15 AM
2

All the screeching and complaining in the world doesn't mean much when the porn industry can just stuff hundreds into the g-strings of legislators. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:11 AM
2

What is this, the 1800s? Women can have exactly the same jobs and get paid exactly the same money as men. They don't need to "trade sex for resources" anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:10 AM
2

I must have missed that giant anti-porn feminist campaign.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:08 AM
5

Men will do pretty much anything the women ask of them. If feminists seriously start campaigning to ban porn, it will be banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 03:00 AM
1

Money = status.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 02:25 AM
2

This isn't about the man "being BB", this is about the man having a steady job, a house and a car and the woman having almost nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 09:57 PM
2

You are directly refuting the idea that social status is attractive in men. Are you sure you want to go the lookism route?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 09:16 PM
2

The theory behind traditional marriage is that if you have everything, and your wife has nothing, then you're hypergaming the fuck out of her. She is more attracted to you that way, and everyone benefits. Traditional marriage has little to do with beta bux in the modern(was there ever any other) sense of the word.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 09:12 PM
1

What does "HB" mean? How do people calcuate their body fat?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 09:09 PM
1

I mean, maybe start with the fact that most men don't want to fuck landwhales period? "Men have low standards" yes, but if your waist-to-hip ratio is >1, if you can't tell where your breasts end and where your stomach folds begin, and if your ass disappears in your thighs and when your face is that of a pig... what exactly are men supposed to "work with" here? You literally do not possess any attractive markers.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 09:08 PM
1

And for good reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 09:03 PM
2

Put in work, get downvoted That will teach you to actually try and not just shitpost like the rest of us
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 09:02 PM
3

IF: more women get degrees than men AND: women's overall earnings are ~70% of men's overall earnings THEN: it is quite safe to conclude that most women are "wasting" their degrees, either by working in a dfferent field, on a low rank position, or working less overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 08:58 PM
6

OP's post immediately made me remember this study, which shows that on average, over their entire lifetime, women are actually a net loss for the country. (Most relevant graph: Figure 17, page 24) The only catch is that this study is based on New Zealand.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 08:56 PM
1

"Being overly thirsty" does not count as "trying", so it's a false equivalency.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 08:47 PM
2

Why in the WORLD would the people who make these laws (primarily men) and the people who enforce them (again, primarily men) craft them in such a way as to "weaponize sex again men?" Why in the WORLD would people who make laws (primarily men) and the people who enforce them (again, primarily men) craft them in such a way to let women out of the kitchen?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 08:46 PM
1

Right, except women can cheat with makeup and men are less picky to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 07:21 PM
1

No. Not in the how-women-rate-him sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 07:20 PM
1

Sample size.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 07:19 PM
1

I've heard this before, but it makes me wonder... Shouldn't betas be doing well then? Maybe they are? I'd love to see the study again, but IIRC the actual explanation was different; the idea is that pregnant women can't get pregnant again, so they don't mind spending time with genetically similar males(family members) that would otherwise put them off(because inbreeding)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 05:13 AM
3

Working out boosts your T for up to an hour. Unless you slay right after gym it's not going to help much.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 05:11 AM
6

Since terms on PPD seem to be very much like asses, tell me what lookist is first
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 04:56 AM
1

So the OKCupid study is wrong because it doesn't agree with a bunch of your personal opinions. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 04:01 AM
1

Because our sexuality isn’t solely based off looks. Not solely, but largely. There’s more to relationships’ failure than “I was never attracted to them in the first place” Actually, that's pretty much it. If they were attracted a little trouble wouldn't end the relationship. and I don’t know what the second part of your sentence is referring to. Many people will simply give up and stay in a relationship they don't even care about simply because they consider themselves too old to bother looking …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 03:16 AM
2

If I had a shot every time someone misinterprets the okcupid study I would pass out after 10 minutes of reading ppd. If I had a shot every time someone makes a smug remark about how "wrong" the okcupid study is without giving even a passing reason why, I would already be drunk - and that's just counting your posts. Three quarters of relationships end in failure for a whole host of reasons. No, they almost always end up for one reson: one or both participants are not attracted to the other party,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 03:09 AM
3

Plate/FWB is Chad zone. Not people-who-settle zone. You're acting like any shmuck can just walk into a bar and leave with a girl. Remember that even "Pickup artists"(lol) have 1% success rate. One fucking percent. Time is money.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:59 AM
1

If women consider 80% of men "below average" how can they not settle hard? If people don't settle hard, why at least three quarters of all relationships end in failure, and the "successful" ones are usually only successful because it's already end of the line?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:57 AM
2

If you just want to get laid, hire a hooker. Significantly cheaper and guaranteed at least average sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:49 AM
2

That's not twisting, that's taking it at face value. You are twisting it into "it's fine, everyone does it".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:48 AM
7

Go down to the mall tomorrow and count the first 100 couples you see. Are all those men tall with perfect faces? No? Simmer on that for a while before posting knee jerk pedantry. It's called monogamy, where women are forced to pick unattractive men because all the attractive ones are already taken. It proves nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:38 AM
1

If he's 5'5, he's not a "great guy". That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:37 AM
6

There's a difference between "it's not a deal breaker" and "sigh I guess he'll do" Sadly PPD is blind to it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:36 AM
3

when you can't tell if it's satire anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:35 AM
2

Men develop charm and charisma in order to attract women. Nowhere near as bombastic as "men only work in order to attract women". 2/10
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:33 AM
3

Get in line with your just world fallacy, and hope you brought a sleeping bag.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:30 AM
2

Cheap jabs aside, I don't think I've ever seen you post anything red. My mind has you categorized as "mild blue"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 01:52 AM
1

Is this the "decline of TRP" that I've been hearing so much about?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 01:49 AM
2

The actual RP truth is: factually speaking women like tall men and there's nothing you can do about your height, but even so it is your duty to optimize your life and better yourself in whatever capacity you can muster because the alternative is far worse. Is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 01:48 AM
2

BB is an okay aspiration if incel/Omega is your only other option. This is what PPD actually believes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 01:42 AM
1

This is entry-level BP platitudes that do not even deserve a rebuttal. Anyone ever noticed that the harder someone tries with nicks/flairs, the more BP they usually are?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 01:34 AM
6

Except she won't, because she swiped left. Except she won't, because Halo Effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:16 AM
2

No one ever said TRP is meant for those less than a 4. No one ever said TRP is meant for the 5 or higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:14 AM
8

just lol when it takes a woman to give red pill to redpillers This is what TRP has become, infinite goalpost moving and backpedalling. Already we have someone saying that "well, TRP is only for 5/10 and higher". How far will they go? Stay tuned!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:43 PM
11

A woman can't judge a man's masculinity based on anything other than appearance using OKC. That doesn't change the fact that women see 80% of men as physically below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:41 PM
0

Rules about civil comments, race-baiting, etc. will still be enforced in this thread boooring
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:37 PM
2

So you can report "incel content" even though it's not stated to be against the rules anywhere. Hmmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:22 PM
1

I was referring to how he's implying that anyone can become "someone an average woman finds attractive", which is roughly top 20% of men. 100% cannot be top 20%. Or any other number.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:21 PM
0

Do you know why middle-eastern women wear burqas? Because it's fucking hot and the sun is a killer. Large, loose clothing is the best kind of clothing for that kind of weather. Ever seen how men in those middle-eastern countries dress? It's basically male burqa, except with a hat, because beard. No, burqa was not specifically invented because middle-eastern men "couldn't control themselves". How can you even write something so fucking retarded. Men can learn to control themselves. Why is it the …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:08 PM
1

you're assuming that chicks start off with a certain amount of pair bonding capability and gradually lose it with every dick they sit on. lol. I don't necessarily agree with OP, but there is a much simpler explanation: sex is like any other activity, the more you do it the easier it gets. Having sex with only one person makes it a strong bonding experience. Having sex with 10 different people reduces sex to the role of light exercise.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:03 PM
3

If the 10/10 guy had an entitled, woman-hating, "poor me" personality and constantly claimed that every problem he has is someone else's fault and the world is just unfair and against him, and had already decided he was doomed to failure and wasn't willing to try, he wouldn't get laid either. He might get a lot of attention Which would get him laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:01 PM
2

Why are posts/comments that do not break any rules allowed to stay up? Does this answer your question OP? There is only one rule PPD introduced to "combat incels", and that is #7: No "woe is me" Posts. The thread you linked to was removed, but from your tone of your post it doesn't seem to have been particularly woe-ish. Aren't you just trying to corerce mods into deleting things you personally don't agree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 08:59 PM
1

There you go. You’ve solved the problem for countless men. Do this and you’ll win. I can't tell if this is sarcasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 08:52 PM
3

Settle with a beta(trivial), fuck around behind his back(also trivial). And yes I'm serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 08:49 PM
1

The poster claims to be red.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 08:47 PM
3

Why do BP arguments always rely on ad hominems, if not as the core of the rhetoric, then certainly as a concluding snipe? That's how socials("normies") operate. They only need to estabilish that the other side is "evil", and then - as we all know "evil" is always wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 08:47 PM
4

Stop participating in what exactly? SMP? Well it might be news to you but a single man can impregnate several women, so it doesn't matter. 90% of men could "stop participating" and it wouldn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 07:30 PM
3

Only in monogamous societes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 07:29 PM
6

Go on and tell women "how awful they are" and we'll see how well that will go for you...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 05:32 AM
7

Let me remind you that even the MRA, which only wants equal rights, is seen at best as a laughing stock, and at worst as dangerous misogynists. Gynocentrism means society will do what's in the best interest of women. "Giving beta males equal access to pussy" or whatever goes directly against best interest of women(muh freedom) This is just more revenge fantasy, "one day men will all wake up and fix this society" yeah no.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 05:20 AM
4

What women want is "not average joe" so what's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 05:14 AM
1

A huge incentive for Spanish colonizers to go to South America was sexual access to the women there once they conquered their societies. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 05:13 AM
2

What "recent uproar in the middle east" are you referring to, and why said middle east middle class men suddenly cannot acquire wives?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 05:12 AM
5

There are plenty if seemingly normal guys out there whom you wouldn't suspect off the bat to be struggling with women when in fact they are. So? "Normal guys" can't change any more than out of shape neckbeard nerds.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 05:10 AM
4

No. Shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 05:02 AM
2

bad bot
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 03:03 AM
6

If betas could overthrow anything, they wouldn't be betas. "Beta uprising" is a revenge fantasy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 02:57 AM
6

That's all fine and good, just don't lie to them about it. That's the real problem, whether it's shit like TBP with its "just wait bro" or shit like TRP with its "just lift bro", it's platitudes either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 02:55 AM
7

I don't think these are made for guys who can get relationships...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 01:41 AM
6

Daily reminder that being in a relationship does not automatically mean you're doing fine
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 01:40 AM
0

He should have went the public obscenity angle, basically the same agument and much harder to attack
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 01:37 AM
1

Oh this is of no relation to this thread, I was just curious giving your, uh, persona
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 12:16 AM
1

How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 12:13 AM
0

So you're saying that instead of "What do I care, I've got it made" it's "What do I care, I've got it made"?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 12:03 AM
1

they don't have the power of the tribe-leader so the provide material things in exchange for sex. Well, then that obviously isn't working given the statistics on how many males actually reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 11:49 PM
1

I love the absolute indifference ITT. Proves so many things.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 11:39 PM
1

21 con of Red Pill what the fuck is that a thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 11:37 PM
2

what even is this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 10:53 PM
1

Why I disagree with the utterly retarded idea that somehow all countries in the world simultaneously decided to engage in a huge social engineering project to "put betas to use" even as it was completely unnecessary because they could just tell them what to do or else? No, I cannot explain it to you without breaking PPD's rules about civil discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 08:16 PM
1

I actually like number 1. Well, that was the only one which was balanced and not a thinly veiled display of your opinions
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 08:06 PM
2

How about just assessing and researching your real-world experiences? So, relying purely on biased personal anecdotes?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 08:04 PM
2

They would have no choice but to achieve more, no more infinite free rides
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 08:02 PM
1

D. Failing that, A. Being in a position of power feels good.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 08:01 PM
1

So you're one of those jokers who believes monogamy was somehow "designed" to "make everyone happy" and "making men productive members of society"?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 08:00 PM
1

The officers admit that sex did happen, indicating that they were alright with risking their employment, their pensions, families, reputations, and possibly time in jail If sex was consentual, how were they risking all that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 07:58 PM
1

I'm very weak to cringe - should I click?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 07:57 PM
4

Of all the annoying, unnecessary H&S regulations to ignore, work boots are not one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 07:57 PM
1

There is more to male attractiveness than just athletic body. A lot more, actually.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 04:10 AM
0

Never saw it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/17 12:12 AM
1

Women's freedom has value because freedom for the most part has intrinsic value. hogwash
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 10:51 PM
1

Women who have been burned in a divorce due to infidelity might vote to pass that bill. Or, which is infinitely more likely, they will vote no because "my stuff" and "us vs. them". That's why it is better to make it about the issue ie: adultery and alimony...than to try and make it about men vs women. Except any issue where you have to consider whether or not you are offending men or women will ultimately boil down to men vs women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 08:12 PM
5

the sub is pretty awful and is basically the face of the “movement”. Reddit's /r/mgtow has almost nothing to do with actual MGTOW, which is mostly concentrated on YouTube(barbarossa, stardusk, tealdeer, turd flinging ape, colttaine, and others)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 08:06 PM
2

This is like third or fourth thread which starts with the assumption that Manosphere wants "someone to do something" about the SMP. Can someone explain to me where does this assumption come from? As far as I'm aware the only people who ever clamored for SMP to be artificially controlled were incels, and even then it was only the most bitter ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 08:04 PM
1

It means going back to polygyny and women mostly breeding with alphas, so it's a good thing. Will clean our gene pool a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 08:01 PM
2

Exactly the same. The idea that all betas would just lay down and die without women to "motivate" them is fucking retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 08:00 PM
1

To say it's an entire gender's fault, destroys the sympathy that other people of that gender who are in your shoes, would have otherwise had for you. So?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:59 PM
1

The hypocrisy of the elites who only start the virtue signalling-machine when women are affected didn't come as a surprise, but the whole thing really showed how much sway over our perception of the world is still held by those who control our "attention economy" simply because they're the ones dishing out the headlines. rofl, yeah. Fuck those evil 1% who invented gynocentrism
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 07:52 PM
3

Most men were never meant to reproduce and it's hopelessly naive to assume "anyone can make it if they only try".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 06:28 PM
2

Evolution works on a time scale orders of magnitude larger than this. Especially evolution of such a basic trait as mate selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 06:26 PM
2

What does a "harem" have to do with pump and dump?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 06:25 PM
1

but think there is a double standard here There is no such thing as "double standard" when you are comparing two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 06:07 AM
1

Well, that's impossible though. It's like telling all people to just "be rational". Most people are not rational and our brains aren't wired for rationality. And men's brains are wired to love women. You're not going to change that with some slogans.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 06:05 AM
0

No man is beyond help THIS IS WHAT REDPILLERS ACTUALLY BELIEVE
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 06:04 AM
6

Who the fuck cares about other people? Making money makes HER happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/17 06:03 AM
3

Most females understand how important sexual intercourse is to males doubt it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 04:00 PM
1

fuck if I know
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 01:45 PM
1

Next, the only reason a man would get into a relationship would be for psychological/emotional reasons /r/deadbedrooms
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 01:45 PM
1

It's actually all just good gene indicators. The rest is modern monogamy-based nonsense. Is masculinity genetic?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 01:43 PM
1

One I let go because he was way better than me in every way. LITERALLY NEVER SATISFIED
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 01:42 PM
1

Two. But what I find most interesting that the last time I was in love was roughly 15 years ago. That's almost half my life. I don't remember all the stupid shit I believed as a teen, so I can't really answer the followup question
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 01:40 PM
2

Sex, being on the very bottom tier of Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs, is a very important motivator for men achieving great things. Uggggghhh, no. Plato did not write The Republic to impress chicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 01:34 PM
1

What makes you think that men thought anything else than increased access to causal sex? What makes you think that men thought anything about sexual liberation? That's like applying white agenda to black suffrage. What did the whites "think" about black suffrage? Why did they allow blacks to vote? What did they hope to gain from it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 10:41 AM
1

For men or women?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 04:06 PM
3

The average man truly believed that the sexual liberation of women would lead to more sex [citation needed]
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 04:05 PM
1

I see many people in this thread replying with the idea that women "learn" how to have sex. Can someone explain to me just what the fuck does that mean? Maybe a checklist of things that you - as a woman - had to learn how to do when having sex? Preferably things which absolutely could not be learned from a single partner, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 04:04 PM
1

Oh, there was a study? Do link it, because I can't see one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 02:06 PM
1

That is not exactly new.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 02:05 PM
2

Because you can't criticize(which "victim blaming" actually is) women, and can criticize men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 01:58 PM
8

Amen.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 01:55 PM
1

Instead of learning to be yourself, you're told to be a man "Instead of wasting your life derping around, you're told to be a good human being" horrible really
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 01:54 PM
1

The whole "provider" thing is bullshit. You are trying to apply evolutionary psychology to last ~5000-10000 years of human history. Human history that spans 200 000 years. And that's just the homo sapiens. Something as basic as instinct probably became "set in stone" even earlier. Don't try to find "explanations" in modern, sedimentary agriculture humans. Look for them in hunter-gatherer tribe humans. That are the conditions we "evolved for". Not agriculture, not nuclear family unit, and not fuc…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 01:52 PM
3

Why, because it's spot on and easy to confirm on your own with ten minutes of googling?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 01:47 PM
1

The TRP denial ITT is hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 04:29 PM
1

In studies of social animals, the highest ranking individual is sometimes designated as the alpha. Why overcomplicate things? Alpha = top of social ladder Alpha traits = traits that help you get there. Beta = average Joe, "not alpha" Omega = bottom of the barrel.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 04:15 PM
1

I met Sean* less than a month after breaking up with my ex, the guy who I moved from New York to California with. "The guy who I moved from New Yourk to California with" wasn't even worth a month of a breakup... Moving in the US must be so easy!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 04:12 PM
1

More blackpill?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/17 04:10 PM
1

where else will I fruitlessly talk about relationship issues?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 04:30 PM
1

yes it is
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 04:17 PM
1

Yes, let's fruitlessly argue like little kids in a clean environment
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 04:14 PM
1

Well then, all you have PPD and therefore are fucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 04:03 PM
1

If you want a "productive discussion" try /r/askhistorians or something
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 03:58 PM
3

If someone wrote a post that long just to personally attack me, I have already won
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 03:53 PM
0

I assure you I am in no way troubled by it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 03:40 PM
1

when you're so salty you're making a thread about it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/17 03:37 PM
3

There is a difference between "feel like you have to" and "have to". I mean it's a fact: women could all stop using makeup and dress up in potato sacks tommorow and men would still want to fuck, and by extension, LTR them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 03:55 PM
6

One last point to keep in mind is that some women want casual sex with a chad-type guy, and lots of it. Some women want monogamy and arent interested in multiple partners. Some women want casual sex when they are young and then want to settle down with a good provider. So, women's answers on what is important to them can vary. ALL men want women to lust after them the way that women lust after chad. ALL men want that ability to attract women the way that chad does, and then have the option of ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 03:50 PM
1

You looked at two (and more) different studies why divorce happens, neither of which even considered partner count, and came to a conclusion that it's not the partner count? rofl
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 03:31 PM
1

Just as a reminder: you were talking about studies that compare(or at least include) partner count to the other factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:47 PM
14

Given the amount of normies that regularly invade /r/incels, incels themselves don't even need to "spread the blackpill". Literally thusands of normies get willingly exposed to it every day just by brigading the sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:44 PM
3

They're probably more likely to hold feminist views because they would never experience the downside of any of them. Since women are readily dropping on their knees to suck their dicks anyway, they never really earn their ire or get on their bad side. It's like a rich person who fully supports basic universal income. Sure, what do they care?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:40 PM
1

Oh? But I thought looks was only 1/3 of what makes Chad a Chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:38 PM
4

If I may: picky bitches are not "forever alone".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:36 PM
1

You showed me 0 of said papers. What do you want me to do, just blindly believe you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:34 PM
3

I haven't seen one source with this specific info Well.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:14 PM
3

Whether I believe you or not is actually irrelevant, as your "soruce" is dogshit to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:13 PM
1

The technology will never be "good enough" and if by some miracle it will be, it will be too expensive for 99% of the populace. AI sexbots are pure science fantasy, like the artificial womb.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 10:52 AM
3

Don't do something stupid and end up in Chinese jail for 20 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 10:46 AM
3

But past that, when you control for class, income, education, age ect, there really isn't much of a difference between low and high n-counts in divorce. source?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 10:45 AM
4

Maybe I'm just a weakling bascially yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 10:44 AM
3

but as stated by a majority of TRPers themselves, the goal is to sleep with as many women as possible while getting attached to as few as possible, in order to make themselves “superior” among both men and women That's a pretty bold claim. Bold enough for me to ask for a source, and you dodging the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 10:42 AM
3

The pessimistic part of me thinks this just comes down to intelligence and people who have better functioning brains have a higher time preference for achieving goals so they are able to achieve long term success. Studies disagree, the higher your IQ the more likely you are to be depressed for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 10:42 AM
2

The idea is that females are constantly comparing males to these great men. If that were true there would never be such a thing as a happy relationship because no man ever would ever be good enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/17 04:42 AM
2

To start, I believe that a vast, vast majority of what we do in our lives as animals revolves around fear. (...) My advice: stop living in fear. My advice to all the depressed people: cheer up
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/17 04:13 AM
5

next purge when
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 07:22 PM
2

I think you are overanalyzing something that is supposed to be a ballpark.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:29 PM
2

1/4 huh? Pretty close to 20%... I'm telling ya, we'll be back to polygyny as soon as women figure this out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:27 PM
1

Well, there are few countries where you can live off of just unemployment benefits. Definitely not the US though, lol. Unless he's still with his parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:22 PM
1

But... he's talking about not caring about others' education, not his
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:19 PM
3

Arms, abs and height also do not matter for woman's enjoyment of sex. Maybe start with dropping the hilarious notion that women are attracted to men who "can make them enjoy sex".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:18 PM
3

Women would lie to you anyway. They have an entire hamster cage built around the idea of rating other people, with arguments like "well if he/she's unattractive then he/she already knows anyway, so there's no point in telling the truth, that would only make them feel bad, instead I will say he/she looks good to maybe make them feel slightly better for a while".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:13 PM
1

I don't remember getting a dating advice from anyone. Is that actually a thing, even if you don't ask for it? "Friends" just spontanelously tell you what to do to get chicks?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:11 PM
1

The primary person you are screwing over doing this is you. Technically, he will be dead before he feels consequences of anything he's done, or rather not done.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:08 PM
3

It's just another revenge fantasy though... or in case of TRP, a full blown conspiracy theory("monogamy was invented to put betas to work") You "contribute to society" with your job. This is twofold, one you are creating a product or providing a service for the rest of society, and two you pay taxes which the govnment redistributes in accordance of society's(read: women's) needs. The only way to "not contribute to society" would be to not work, but then you literally starve to death, which is a …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:07 PM
4

Uhhh, did you miss the whole nice guy thing? "Grown responsible men who have good careers" and yet cannot find a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:04 PM
2

No one is capable of understanding how it is to be even three points away on the attractiveness scale. And that goes both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:02 PM
1

.99/1?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 05:40 AM
4

Well, not all of it. But like, nine out of ten.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 07:41 PM
1

Meanwhile, regular guys
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 05:24 PM
9

Yes, I can see how men are "gatekeepers of commitment" now lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 05:17 PM
1

It wasn't from the sub, it was one of the MGTOW YouTubers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 04:57 PM
2

Just like people who slave away in shitty jobs were "attracted" to the piddly amount of money they're making.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 05:32 AM
1

Why is it a problem you're in a relationship with a girl that is ultimately not attracted to you? lol, try asking /r/deadbedrooms
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/17 05:10 AM
1

Specifically, it comes from the pareto principle. Confirmed by Tinder and OKCupid, then confirmed by polygyny in remaining primitive human societes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 04:23 AM
1

This thread is full of pictures of people who should never be in relationships with anyone
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 04:20 AM
1

Monogamy. /r/deadbedrooms.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 04:19 AM
3

From my experience people are generally completely incapable of telling the difference between statutory rape and rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 04:16 AM
1

Are all of you people using that psychobabble Myers-Briggs types unironically?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 04:10 AM
6

Incels as I experience them are guys with a poor hand, who play it poorly, then fold, then refuse to learn the rules of poker because "it's all too hard. Aces beat everything, so if you haven't got aces it's hopeless". Well, at least in that case they're correct. Even if you looksmax, "advance" to beta and get a relationship, you're in that relationship only because the woman had no other option. You are her n-th best pick. If you are truly and utterly hideous, have some real goddam facial defor…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 10:40 PM
4

They're are genuine FA's and Incels who are hideous. Thats like 1% of the incels I talk to. Then you could've just written "most incels are actually betas in self-pity circlejerk" instead. Hell, most incels would probably even agree with you, missing the irony completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 09:59 PM
1

But that man probably "regulates" his wife's behavior in the same way. But the men in the study are presumably not married. If they don't like their girlfriends "regulating" their behavior, then I'm not sure why they don't break up. I guess it's time for you to back to Sexual Marketplace 101 then. Specifically, supply and demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 09:42 PM
1

Most of that happens "under the table" but basically, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 09:41 PM
10

ITT, a terper posts pictures of betas, whom he calls omegas, to prove omegas can be good looking if they try. Then he repeats the age-old trope of "woman settling on you is great success!"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 09:31 PM
1

Not for 80% of males at least
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 03:50 AM
3

It seems like, in my opinion, by the time folks hit their 30s, regardless of what their lifestyles were like in the past, most people want to settle down and have a family. I don't think that's a problem. More like, by they time folks hit their 30s, they can't easily get laid anymore and have to settle
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 12:50 AM
13

You admit it's a myth then ask how to address it? What?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 12:45 AM
2

Question to all women here who had a lot of ONS: how often were they with one specific "type" of man?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 10:54 PM
1

Did Sims ever get beyond "if we both talk about trains, we'll marry" as far as relationships go?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 08:02 PM
2

Well, if you can't/don't want to apply a moral judgement to the act of objectifying something, what even is the point of your post?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 07:49 PM
3

Frankly speakig I have nothing but contempt for the people who "game" while browsing the net on the second monitor, or with a TV on in the room, or who turn off the game music and use their own playlists. That kind of half-assed approach to gaming is fucking disgusting and they're all worthless casuals who should not open their dumb holes and talk about videogames.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 07:46 PM
2

Men thought No they didn't. You are assigning agency to something that happened naturally and organically based on some very simple factors, which were really out of anyone's control or even understanding. Sexual revolution was a result of things like affordable birth control(which was a random invention) women's participation in the job market(and that in turn was a result of industrial revolution which drastically decreased the amount of physical jobs), universal suffrage(which is a result of …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 07:42 PM
1

When he's masculine 98% of the time kek
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 07:31 PM
4

I don't think psychology works that way. I don't actually think anything works that way, outside of some kind of dating sim RPG.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 07:31 PM
1

but I actually only use one. Then it's not symmetrical at all
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 07:27 PM
1

I think people who design commercials know far more about typical behaviour of their target audiences than the entirety of PPD
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 03:49 AM
-1

and it really sucks if people (in this case: women) are basically barred from pursuing certain careers because they're cockblocked by some predatory bigshot. It takes two to tango.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 03:45 AM
1

"What are we?"...uhh people? Useful!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 03:42 AM
1

Tell that to women, they're the ones with standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 03:42 AM
1

Seriously? You think the kind of person who is forced to use a sexbot or do that "waifu" shit because no woman will even look in his general direction is somehow "perfectly happy" about it? And no, you don't order a Russian or Asian wife like you shop on Amazon. That's not even ridiculous, that's patent crazy talk. How do women do the same thing? You think women don't rate men? You think women don't laugh at old virgins and don't praise studs? You think they don't dislike the man showing evidenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 10:32 PM
1

mmmhm
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 10:28 PM
-1

Since I really don't feel like correcting every single sentence you wrote, I won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 10:25 PM
8

All our "developed brains" are doing, for the most part, is just coming up with excuses for our instinctual - animal - behaviours.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 10:08 PM
1

They order Russian or Asian wives online like they were shopping on Amazon. They are perfectly happy replacing women with waifu's or sex bots. I mean, I do agree with your post in general, but this is just ridiculous. Not to mention, women largely do exactly the same, and this was exactly OP's point.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 10:04 PM
1

All women DO try to perpetuate hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 10:01 PM
2

But everyone can get somewhere, somehow, with the opposite sex if they put effort into it. But the point isn't to "get somewhere, somehow" but to have a happy relationship. Like, I'm not going to spend half a day in the kitchen just to eat something that tastes like wet cardboard. Or walk ten miles to get a pack of gum. Could most incels get some fat post-wall single mother to "date" them and take complete control over their life, with starfish sex once every two weeks? Probably. Would you hones…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 09:53 PM
2

Then lie it was 0?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 09:41 PM
1

Luckily, this is not unsolvable. Unless it is unsolvable
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 09:37 PM
6

Yes. Me and my friends. All 5 of you? I'll let the 5 million single men know
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 07:40 PM
1

Cazy(being very religious qualifies) or a trap.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 07:39 PM
1

incels won by triggering everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 07:38 PM
1

Don't forget the salad.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 09:35 PM
1

Women like men who are remarkable at something, it often doesn't matter what that something is. I can quote all audiologs from System Shock 2. Are you wet yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 09:35 PM
1

Makeup has nothing to do with biology. So why do women wear it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 09:32 PM
1

Show me a culture where being wealthy is not a status symbol then.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 09:17 PM
1

And where is your biology involved in all of that? The "women are attracted to status" part?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 07:20 PM
1

It's not a good representation of any demographic. Normal people don't fucking discuss the relationships pills. They don't even realize they exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 07:16 PM
0

This is so hilariously wrong I don't even know what to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 07:15 PM
2

3rd percentile narcissism, 30th percentile machiavellianism, 14th percentile psychopathy. No wonder I can't get any girls! (These numbers surprise me tbh, I'd rate my psychopathy way higher)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 07:11 PM
1

It's almost like money is equated with status and women are attracted to status!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 07:05 PM
2

Biology-based society and culture, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 06:48 PM
1

What makes humans bound to "picking the best partner" Biology? Natural selection? Almost all animals do mate selection. and what makes the "best partner" the best partner? Alpha male, as decided by social standing in a group
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 05:57 PM
-2

You didn't read the rest of my reply. I did, just disregarded it because we don't know the distribution of nerve endings in vaginas, therefore cannot know what orgasms are due to lack of nerve endings an which ones are due to fucking unattractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 03:55 AM
2

Women might be more likely to orgasm with a partner they find more attractive So there you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 03:41 AM
2

It is well known that women will get wet even when watching videos of dogs fucking. Or getting raped. Likely to prevent damage to the vagina. For women physical arousal != psychological arousal, that's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 03:15 AM
4

No, benevolent sexism is just another word for gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 02:57 AM
0

No one implied that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 02:54 AM
4

No, that's because of gynocentrism.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 02:54 AM
1

Aren't things different in different areas? No, it would be nonsensical for humans to evolve to pick anything but the best available partner. But FYI, PPD is US-centric. Whenever data, statistics, etc. are quoted it is assumed they are from the US
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 02:06 AM
0

Then delete one gender and allow the other to reproduce asexually.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 01:44 AM
-1

Oh? Isn't female sexual arousal "psychological"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 01:44 AM
3

What I meant that "making everyone equal" in a gynocentric society will heavily favor women. Just like how criminal law is egalitarian, yet women get 60% shorter sentences.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 01:32 AM
-3

I have a pet theory that all women absolutely CAN orgasm from PIV alone, assuming the man they're fucking is someone they're actually sexually attracted to and not just "stable beta" they settled on.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 01:11 AM
2

egalitarianism = feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 01:10 AM
1

E.g. there will be guys who will stop having (non-boring) sex with their women after they give birth, because they "can't do that to the mother of their children". While they jerk off to nasty porn or visit prostitutes to get their fix. It's a thing and it's fucked up. I have literally never seen or heard about this, until now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 09:40 PM
3

Men will have sex, condoms or not. Free condoms fall under "healthcare" as there are significant health risks to STDs.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 09:34 PM
1

lol, GreasyPole. I was thrown off by the "pre-civilization times" part of your post. Pre-civilization = pre-agriculture = pre-monogamy. Marriage did not exist at all in "pre-civilization times". The primary male mating strategy in humans is "Heirs and Bastards" The primary male mating strategy is "fuck everything that moves", really. But it's basically the same thing as you said, only you needlessly applied some kind of agency to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 07:31 PM
2

What does it matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 07:25 PM
6

And it was proposed by Freud, who does not exactly have the best record to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 07:21 PM
2

...because for incels, this isn't about just putting a penis in a vagina. Are you people being obtuse on purpose?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 07:17 PM
1

In pre-civilization times, it is the distinction between the love of the woman they marry, care for and devote 100% of your resources to with the women you sleep with on the side. wat
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 07:13 PM
3

MGTOW, in theory, are alphas that shun LTRs with women. In practice it's mostly "YOU CAN'T FIRE ME, I QUIT!" betas, but yeah. Not really incels either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:07 PM
3

Since all these movements are reactionarly this is basically a question how the SMP will change in the future. My bet is on the return to polygyny. So: PUA ded, TRP ded, MGTOW mostly ded, huge rise in incels except they will not call themselves incels anymore to avoid "bad connotations with that older incels thing".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:37 AM
1

There is no evidence to suggest learned game leads to misogyny. I'll have to say that "learning the truth about women" not only can but absolutely should learn to misogyny, unless you're in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:33 AM
4

Yeah I think this has less to do with her staying at home and more to do with the fact she was never attracted to him at all(in best case, in worst case she planned all this from the beginning)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:31 AM
5

Don't assume that 'doesn't want to date me' = 'thinks I'm garbage'. This is literally the only logical conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:29 AM
4

Technically, TRP is also a place for "losers"(who want to get better) If you look at popularity of subs like /r/meirl, /r/2meirl4meirl or /r/absolutelynotmeirl, people really like to put themselves down in front of an audience. Even casually browsing subs like /r/askreddit, there isn't a single thread about looks, relationships, sex, etc. without a token "forever alone" post.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:27 AM
1

Your intelligence does not affect your standards either.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/17 06:05 AM
1

This question is going to be heavily dependant upon the income of the man. This question is heavily dependend on a whole lot of shit, so it's best to just answer it at face value
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 04:07 PM
2

Preferably. Working some silly job at three quarter/half hours also possible
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 04:06 PM
1

Low SMV girls don't have different standards than high SMV girls. The only difference is that they can't get any high SMV guys(as they're taken by the high SMV girls) so they might settle with a low SMV guy out of desperation. Doesn't really sound like a recipe for a "healthy, fulfilling and rewarding" relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 03:19 PM
2

A good chunk of the BP men appear to be "naturals" who find the concept of TRP absurd because they've never needed game. BP are natural alphas now? If that is the case, then I cannot fathom how stupid to have to be to be unable to identify what exactly is it that makes them attractive to women, especially considering they're given a cheat sheet(TRP)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 02:00 PM
8

An essay is not "Science" I don't think
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 04:00 PM
1

It's a nitpick, but behaviour and mannerisms do qualify as "outward apperance", no?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 01:57 PM
1

That whole "japanese work themselves to death" thing isn't actually a thing for like, 20 years now. Check the hours worked/country data.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 10:48 AM
1

to try to prove or disprove my hypothesis that men actually prefer women who look like they're in their mid 20s than women who look 18. lol, good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 10:42 AM
2

That's ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 10:34 AM
1

Or maybe you're picking men wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 10:34 AM
1

tl;dr: NoFap
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 10:32 AM
1

So if we are to define casual sex from a woman's perspective as, not necessarily sex with somebody you aren't in a committed relationship with, but rather as having sex with a man who you have no feelings for And you were doing so well. What feelings? Love? lol most relationships aren't even based on love. At least not a mutual love.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 09:03 AM
1

All women care about is how attractive the dude is. There is no "providers" in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 08:18 AM
1

Yes, never stop believing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/17 08:16 AM
3

None. Not a single person ever hit on me in my 30+ years of life. I guess I just underestimated female intuition which apparently not only can detect if you post misogynist stuff online, but can also do it 5-10-15 years in advance before it even happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 04:26 PM
1

This isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 03:07 PM
1

I think the phrase you were probably searching for is “aggravating and condescending prick”. No, that sounds like pure wishful thinking on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 01:54 PM
2

You are the living definition of the word "platitude".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 01:03 PM
1

But this is only because terpers choose to not enter LTRs. Otherwise, any woman who is willing to have sex with you is also willing to be in a relationship with you. Unless you want to propagate more of the "AFBB" nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 11:11 AM
2

Because the alternative is oblivion Have you never noticed how /r/incels is full of suicide memes? And it's not just the memes. There were threads of people saying goodbye, this is it, I'm killing myself. And the replies were not the usual Reddit "plz no someone wubz u, permanent solution to temporary problem" (Obviously you didn't, because you never actually visited the board, and instead argue with your own made-up image of "incels") And what kind of argument even is "the alternative is oblivi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:50 AM
1

Like I said, I'm sure it gets results. I just think it would make a poor mate from a woman's point of view. You are contradicting yourself. If terpers would made poor mates, then they wouldn't get results.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:40 AM
3

I don't like alphas, I've never dated one. They're pricks. High betas--guys who take care of their own needs as well as the needs of their partner--have always been my cup of tea. So "high betas" are your cup of tea, yet you can't apparently hold a relationship with one. Hmmm...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:38 AM
1

I have a below average size penis. I gave my girlfriend an orgasm during PIV this morning that she mentioned 3 different times throughout the day. Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:37 AM
2

Yeah, that's kind of the point. If you can't beat 'em, suck their dicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:36 AM
1

What works the best on women : fingers and tongue. Then she doesn't need you at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:34 AM
2

What good is humor when it literally is only mostly understood by your group and none others? You are literally asking "what good are memes?" Well, they're plenty good for a lot of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:30 AM
2

Artificial wombs are not a thing. They were never a thing. And they couldn't possibly ever BE a thing. Even if we had the technology - and we don't, and will not in any foreseeable future - social and economic barriers would be impossible to overcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:26 AM
1

According to incels, not getting pussy Stopped reading
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 09:17 AM
4

Why put effort going from omega to beta, if the "prize" is some post-wall roastie settling on your sorry ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 04:16 PM
11

No, incels win because they confront people with a problem that is impossible to solve. This absolutely destroys both bluepillers and redpillers, since both ideologies rely on two sides of the same just world fallacy coin to function. Problem that has no solution + just world fallacy = cognitive dissonance. And cognitive dissonance = crying, whining, lashing out, throwing tantrums and even changing the very rules of this sub to prevent incel content from appearing at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:27 PM
3

Jesus fucking christ you monumental fucktard, how can you still be thinking this is just about being a virgin? Do you really thik the entire /r/incels would simply STOP EXISTING if they only could bang a whore? You are literally the stupidest person on /r/purplepilldebate, and believe me, I am not saying this lightly. The competition is fucking fierce, but you trump them all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:12 PM
1

clever nickname?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:00 PM
2

/shrug
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:00 PM
1

What fictional character wouldn't I bang?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 12:55 PM
1

Women all want alpha males. The whole "beta bucks"(aka women want providers) is a myth. Monogamy is forced on everyone. It's so ingrained in our society that men with harems are seen as crazy creeps. It's so ingrained it's enforced by most religions. But don't worry, that's slowly changing. Women can't "want" monogamy when the natural state of our species is polygyny. This makes no evolutionary sense. Note how women are more attracted to men with a lot of partners. There's nothing monogamous abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:33 AM
1

There are men out there who are more confident, more handsome, and wealthier than my boyfriend. We are happy together. Job compaison. If you find exactly the same job with exactly the same commute, that pays 2% more, would you change your job? Most people probably wouldn't. It's not worth the hassle to switch to an entirely new environment full of strangers for 2% extra pay. But if said pay was 20% higher? I'm certain most people would hardly think twice. That's how female hypergamy works. Assum…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:23 AM
1

Is your goal just impregnating women or a good relationship? Because if it's the former, rape would suit you even better.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:12 AM
1

Yes, always ignore dissenting opinions That's a good trick Also try spinning
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:26 PM
1

Then you're an ignorant fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:25 PM
1

I "pick one point" because by now I know your posts aren't worth reading, so I just skim then and pick first stupid thing that I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:23 PM
1

Why all the effort? You simply define "sexual assault" in such a nebulous and broad way that almost anything applies. For example, a guy looked at you and then licked his lips. Did that make you uncomfortable? Congratulations, you were Sexually Assaulted. Into the "A" column you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:18 PM
2

They have this immense desire for full acceptance and wanting to be loved for who they are. "We are genetic trash" "we shouldn't have been born" "I blame my parents" I mean, if you want to rage on the weird imagined incels in your head, be my guest
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:11 PM
7

"Victim blaming" is a legal concept. It means the crime of the perpetrator is not in any way lessened by the victim's actions. For example, theft from a locked safe hidden behind a painting and theft from an unlocked drawer in a night stand next to an open window is the same crime of "theft". The thief won't get a lesser sentence because in the latter case, the victim was a fucking moron. But the victim was a fucking moron and it is always good to point it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:09 PM
1

Why do you assume I was 7th best? 14th, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:59 PM
1

You really don't believe that, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:57 PM
1

it is a mystery
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 06:53 AM
12

RE: 2 - reminds me of what girlwriteswhat once said: You'll notice in my comment, I said "yes, women". This debacle of a gender war is not just on the minority of women who are feminists--it's on most women who've not just tolerated it, but viewed the social and legal changes the way looters view a race riot. Sure, they might not care about the issues, but they'll happily take advantage of the measures feminists have managed to enact, or to ignore the way those measures unjustly harm men until t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:44 AM
1

Ehh.... I'm not so sure if this is innate, though. Well, I am pretty sure. Evolutional change, I mean. There is basically zero evolutionary changes between a human living today and a human living 5000 years ago. And certainly zero evolutionary change in something as deeply basic as sexual instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:37 AM
1

Beyond sex, what traits does each gender desire from the other? literally nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:35 AM
1

Honestly, no. What's the point of flairs during The Purge?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:32 AM
2

Here's how I see it. TRP is about getting into an LTR with a woman that doesn't end in cheating or /r/deadbedrooms MGTOW is about not getting into an LTR with a woman. Ever. incels/blackpill is about LDAR.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:31 AM
1

As some-or-other MGTOW put it, religion is humanity's ongoing immortality project. How else are you going to deal with the inevitable reality of DEATH?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:29 AM
2

maybe he's not normal it's a theory
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:28 AM
3

Women judge men's height compared to other men, not to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:27 AM
1

I no longer crave porn because I cannot realistically imagine myself having sex with a girl. I can't either and I whack it to porn just fine. Maybe you need a change of perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:25 AM
3

You should have seriously added "In US/west" to your thread title
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:25 AM
1

10-4
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:24 AM
1

I dunno
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:23 AM
2

Everybody agrees hopeless cases exist Check posts by /u/alreadyredschool and /u/TheGreasyPole in this very thread. They LITERALLY CANNOT ACCEPT existence of hopeless cases in their neat little worlds.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:22 AM
1

why do you think you're right when you sit at the bottom and squint to see? Because I'm not an idiot and I realize knowledge is gained by learning and analysis, not personal, entirely anecdotal and subjective experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:21 AM
0

car literally without an engine hurrr durr if I only took it to a mechanic NEVER STOP BELIEVING DON'T LET YOUR DREAMS BE DREAMS
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:20 AM
1

You're literally not being objective by only focusing on the positives. oh, and have this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depressive_realism
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:19 AM
1

The average man has been in, or is currently in, a relationship. WITH A WOMAN WHO SETTLED ON HIM.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:16 AM
2

What is it you want incels? I can't speak for all of incels, surely. But personally I just want you to admit that some people are fucked up beyond help and there's absolutely nothing they can do about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:14 AM
3

Well, I guess hot men have better things to do than Reddit. Fair point. (Except posting on PPD that is. Every male PPD poster is a Chad)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:12 PM
1

I feel bad for you if you think otherwise. Have some objectivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:12 PM
2

You're talking the old TRP "women don't love you, just how you make them feel" and stretching it to infinity. An alpha will "make them feel" better than a beta. So who the fuck cares? In practice, there's no difference. "Women don't love men, they just desire them" same fucking thing. What an idiotic argument to make. Again.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 07:10 PM
2

No, that sounds like a beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:39 PM
5

Do you never tire of the just world fallacy?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:39 PM
1

I am a Chad. Just like every other male on PPD. And every woman on PPD is an unicorn that only dates fat losers. Answer the question. I'm trying to understand your view. Uh, do I want a woman who is entirely satisfied with me. Wow. What a question. Let me think about it and call a friend. I'll go back to you on this. But the answer's yes, for fuck's sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:38 PM
3

Because there is nothing "positive" about someone settling on you
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:36 PM
2

debating and exploring new viewpoints As if that ever happened on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:22 PM
16

(unless they're hot, then it's hot)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:19 PM
2

In reality, modern day society benefits white men even more (at least those who aren't social and sexual failures). So it benefits top 20% of men? I mean, I can see why the remaining 80% of men would be unhappy with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:16 PM
3

Christ it's like never-ending whack-a-mole with you people. Yes, congratulations on getting laid because the woman in question couldn't get a Chad. How does it feel to be the seventh best?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:14 PM
1

You understand that no matter how awesome you are, you will have a weakness and thus some man exists that is better than you in that way, making hypergamy never fully satisfied, and thus the woman's irrational mind is always to be settling, even with a Chad? That sounds like serious beta coping. "B-b-b-b-but she ALWAYS settles! Because muh irrationality! So there's no difference between me and Chad!" Chad absolutely mogs you, he could pump and dump your wife and she'd thank him for it. Deal with…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:12 PM
1

I understood that reference.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:08 PM
2

I would say 20%, but then you would start thinking that "oh well, guess the remaining 80% has got it fine then!" which would be wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:07 PM
2

Lol who do you think average women end up with? Weren't we over this? They SETTLE on average males. Do you know what the word "settle" even fucking means?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:03 PM
1

https://i.imgur.com/fxbOrT2.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect#Role_of_attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:39 PM
4

Everyone can do it, if only they try hard enough Did I mention you're an idiot? I think I did
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:38 PM
2

No, the cheapest way to get long-term, consistent sex is to just live with a woman who has a job, not share bank accounts and not marry her. Which is impossible to pull off for an average dude. Thanks for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:31 PM
0

I dunno man, apparently you're supposed to just bottle it all up inside then go and shoot up a school. That's the PPD's Sanctioned Way of Inceldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:29 PM
0

Not a lot, but some. Get a hooker then, it's cheaper in the long run
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:23 PM
4

TIL the fact that men work longer hours in better jobs is somehow unfair to women
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:20 PM
3

what you're saying is that a man who has basically no choice in women, and who has to wait until some woman settles on him out of desperation, should move on to a different more attractive woman afterwards. Which makes no logical sense, because you're an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:19 PM
1

implying that you'll get a lot of sex as an average looking male
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:16 PM
3

you're an idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:15 PM
1

But they are always intellectually vacuous snarky cunts with no fear of reprecussions
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:49 PM
3

serves you right/10
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:49 PM
2

They're both 4-5/10. First one is potato head and potato nose. Second one's entire face was stretched sideways in a vice when he was a baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:46 PM
2

3/10
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:42 PM
2

Yet that does not mean that men without those advantages cannot become sexually successful with women, True Players even. if by "sexually successful" you mean "some post-wall woman will settle with them and they'll be locked in a miserable sexless marriage for the rest of their life" then sure great success
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:41 PM
1

Apparently you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:39 PM
2

wow, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:29 PM
1

Admit group of people are trolls Still take everything they say seriously... ...and somehow use that as proof of their trollery women
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:27 PM
1

I think Spain used to have 12 until not too long ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:05 PM
1

Weren't you supposed to GTFO? Thanks for the ultra short(for you) post though
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:52 AM
3

There have been tons of societies where men are basically unemployed and are taken care of by women in what fiction
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:52 AM
1

Currently the first Samsung Galaxy XCover. But I regret it a bit, if I could choose again I'd go for the original Lumia. I mean, I could also buy the Lumia and replace my XCover, but since it still works, and since I'm not an insatiable consumerist whore like OP, I see no reason to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:50 AM
7

It's all about the WTH ratio and ass anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:47 AM
3

It is arbitrary. That's why there's such a huge variation in age of consent. From 12 to 20 depending on the country, not counting those where it's only legal after marriage. Age of consent is basically nothing but a reflection of "morality" of the particular society. It has almost nothing to do with psychology of children/teens and their actual ability to give consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:45 AM
2

everyone I disagree with is a troll! Step 1: denial
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:46 AM
2

Trying to trigger MGTOWs by accusing them of something they are actually actively working towards and proud of wew lad
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:45 AM
1

The thing about incest is that it often carries the baggage of very tilted power dynamics. So does fucking your boss, and no one cares. Making up excuses
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:41 AM
6

Is there any particular reason for this? Perhaps to attract the "very best" guy around? What do you think, genius? The same could be said of women. "They'll fuck anything, including dogs". Uuuh, no. Men don't rate 80% of women as "below average". Men have significantly higher sex drives that clouds their judgments much easier. Men have a significantly wider "taste" in porn. Men don't care much about anything but looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:38 AM
1

Plenty of incels looksmaxed and it didn't do jack shit for them. But of course you're going to call them all liars just to protect your precious little worldview where EVERYONE CAN DO IT IF THEY TRY!!111
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:28 AM
2

dam gurl
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 06:45 PM
2

The point is to rub it in your stupid normie faces how your advice is worthless shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 06:45 PM
2

you are making a fair point How 2 get gold chocobo?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 04:30 PM
1

y tho
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 04:29 PM
3

What does "unrealistic standards" even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 04:29 PM
1

They were constantly making posts asking for advice, when in reality they just wanted to bitch. It's almost like they were mocking your attempts at "advice" when there's no real advice you can give someone that is plain uggo
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 04:28 PM
2

Sounds like a plan. Not sure what it has to do with PPD though
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 04:26 PM
1

If you want monogamy, that is the only way for it to work that I can see. Otherwise, enjoy your Chad harems in 100 years while remaining 80% of men just fap to VR porn
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 04:01 PM
1

The entire point is to sell inequality as equality lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 03:45 PM
1

BMI-normal, not brain-normal
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 05:16 AM
1

Dude, the entire point is that if you make men and women completely equal, it will result in patriarchy. Companies will stop hiring women because they're a liability. Women will have to marry men for providership and to have/keep children. Just like in the fifties. With women out of work and without social status, hypergamy will start working properly again. I'm not even entirely talking out of my ass. Research consistently shows that the more gender-equal a society is, the more women gravitate …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 05:15 AM
1

That's the entire point dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 05:11 AM
1

Looks mean very little. lolololololol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 05:10 AM
1

It is a revenge fantasy insofar as imagining them abandoned in torn clothing at a side of the road. In the rain. When in reality they snag some beta bux who then proceeds to post on PPD how TRP is wrong because he's a beta and yet he has a hot wife, that fucks him once a month. But that's cool because relationships aren't about sex anyway you shallow asshole. But such a woman will never get a Chad, because Chad has options, options that don't fuck around and options that aren't closing to 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:47 PM
0

nope
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:41 PM
1

This isn't about incels not getting laid. lol, this privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:41 PM
1

but alleged "sluts" get wifed up all the time. By beta bux that they settle on yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:29 PM
3

Because they can't get normal white women. White women rate black men as least attractive IIRC
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:23 PM
2

PPD had a subscriber growth? I never paticipated, but as I understand there are weekly offtopic threads, many people here exchange PMs, hang out on IRC or Discord or whatever cool kids use nowodays, and know each other on first name basis... this wasn't a valid place for discussion for years
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:21 PM
1

Once you useless skanks fuck off the job market we will be actually be able to pay men enough to sustain a family on their own again
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:09 PM
-1

High value men don't care for women they want to just pump and dump. I'd reckon they wouldn't want having their actual wife kiss their child with lips that sucked dick and licked ass of thirty men
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:06 PM
1

Breed then, but don't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:02 PM
0

Because you're a slut you don't want men who "obsess"(read: have a valid concerns about) your sexual history, because you know your sexual history is like a dumpster outside a gay bar on a sunday morning
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 04:00 PM
4

Here is the reason: Japan and Korea and really, most places on earth, hold sex to be more sacred than the West does. http://hentaifox.com/tag/mind-break/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:53 PM
1

Well yeah, because you are a slut, thus proving OP's point
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:53 PM
3

if women actually ever checked their privilege they would just break down crying and then start giving out free blowjobs to every male they see
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:50 PM
2

your post is so bad it would work as a satirical one on /r/incels
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:47 PM
1

how is that relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:47 PM
1

If you were good looking you'd be getting laid. If you don't, then I have some bad news
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 03:04 PM
1

monogamy it's hell of a drug
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:56 PM
2

Over here your boyfriend severely pushes to get into your pants and we're told it's normal to have sex. Over there people probably gasp if you've had sex. If you learned everything you know about Japan from anime, sure
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:54 PM
2

By contrast, arranged marriages in India are very successful. "A recent study of relationship outcomes among Indian-American couples married either through free-choice or arranged marriages for about a decade found absolutely no differences. Those in arranged marriages were just as satisfied with their marriage and loved their partner as intensely as those who wed through free-choice." bruh... given that the "free-choice marriage" has a 40% outright failure rate, I don't think you can put it up …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:53 PM
2

Why are our incels so fucking whiny about it when they could just take the Japanese route and watch cartoons fuck instead 90% of /r/incels are weebs so...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:47 PM
2

inb4 MUH JAPAN IS FULL OF INCELS - nope. lol, then why are also over 40% of jap men virgins? 40% undesirable japanese omega males + monogamy = 40% female japanese virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:46 PM
1

Admit it, you want to be /r/incels' sex slave
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:21 PM
6

companionship other men kids not actually anyone's imperative, nature programmed us to "fuck", not "have kids" also so they can have a better life with good food and good habits Neither requires a nagging, possessive bitch to achieve some would argue it would be easier without
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:09 PM
5

As for wives and husbands, I'm convinced that even in this world where women stop having sex with their husbands, men would still want wives. lolno
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 01:00 PM
7

There was actually research about this. It turned out that over a period of 20 years, hookers are cheaper than a wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 12:56 PM
2

I didn't mean it literally dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 11:36 AM
3

YOU DON'T KNOW ME
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:32 AM
1

gay anime faces bad bot
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:31 AM
2

good bot
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:29 AM
8

One thing led to another and I started ducking heights of various "dictators" Putin is 5'7" Stalin is 5'6" Hitler is 5'8" Franco 5'4" Hirohito 5'5" Chiang Kai-Shek 6'2"(!) Thatcher 5'5" bunch of fucking manlets
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:28 AM
1

FYI, it's "rules 4 and lower", that is rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. 5 and onwards are still not allowed so you're getting banned forever. (just proves how much everyone really hates incels)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:16 AM
1

Remindme! 3 years "It will be hilarious when it actually happens"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:13 AM
2

standards set correctly there's no such thing you moron. You either are attracted to someone or you are not, and there isn't anything you can do to change that
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:12 AM
1

even incels agree, as long as you are fat you're a volcel
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:11 AM
2

Breaking(LMR) and entering(her ass)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 09:10 AM
1

As a man, I do not feel I fully understand this article or the concept of emotional labor (even after reading), and I was hoping someone here could explain it to me. "Stupid entitled cunt does literally nothing around the house and yet still manages to find a reason to complain about how "oppressed" she is and a way to paint herself as a victim" it's like feminism 101 PS you came here at the wrong time
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:58 AM
8

PUBLISHED IN RESPECTABLE SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 08:00 AM
2

only insofar as restricting free speech of incels ugh, incels, so yucky!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:57 AM
1

I am not going to play your question game. But I would totally "save" some poor ukrainian girl from lifetime in poverty. I would marry her and import her to the west and then give her everything and we would live in a small house with two children happily ever after eating yoghurts in a blindingly lit dining rooms. You know, if I wasn't a beta piece of shit
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:52 AM
1

posting "shocking" footage to prove you are not childish exactly what a child would do Mom look at me I'm so hardcore because I watch teevee shows with blood in them!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:47 AM
1

Well duh. Anime is for pussies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:46 AM
1

AWALT
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:40 AM
1

bad bot
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:37 AM
3

That's because you cannot mock the bluepillers, as they already mock themselves with every post
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:33 AM
2

Chain them so that they can only move between the bathroom, kitchen and bedroom and let them take care of the children while The Man is out partying and banging high school sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:28 AM
1

Disagree, it should not be participated in at all
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:26 AM
2

And what euphonious serenade would a languidly casual, thick and meaty 6.5 inch cock boisterously echo? Rocky theme, whenever its whipped out
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:26 AM
2

I'm very confused. Your flair says one thing, and your OP is a perfect mockery of feminist "logic" of affirmative action so confused [Edit]Oh, apparently we're in some purge week? Mods, you do realize I can't see stickied threads when browsing by /new right
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:24 AM
1

and cling to their rigid perceptions even when it clashes significantly with reality. is this supposed to be ironic because it is
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 07:22 AM
2

No shit? Ignorance is bliss.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 05:21 AM
2

Oh, I bet. If by "works" you mean "get a lot of money from stupid people".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 04:56 PM
1

I guess that's why RPers are less likely to be single and have longer, more satisfying relationships than BPers. Oh wait... You have absolutely no data to back it up. And even if you did, you are doing the classic blue fallacy of assuming that most relationships are a good ones, when the opposite is true. And it's fairly easy to prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 04:46 PM
1

Is this for fucking real. A dating coach. Seriously. That's a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 04:43 PM
1

Because it's not "do x or I'll hurt you in some way". It's "if you don't do x I'll just go away". Do you seriously see no difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 04:14 PM
1

Yes, sometimes words have different definitions than their literal meaning who knew
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:23 AM
2

If you put a gun against someone's had and say you'll pull the trigger if they don't fuck you And again, dread game is the opposite of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 09:22 AM
1

No one is truly incel, sex is a hundred bucks away. Unless it's not just about putting penis in a vagina Which I just said But you completely ignored in order to propagate your bizzaro view of incels and apparently male validation in general lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:29 AM
1

Do you agree with this post? Mostly. But unlike you I don't see it as some kind of weird celebration of rape. I see it as an example of how TRP is able to predict female behaviour, that you for some reason mock, even though the guy was correct in his guesses every time(not to even mention the whole "fuck a girl and don't call her for a week and she'll love you" that forms the very basis of this story) Furthermore, I have absolutely zero sympathy for the "rape victim" based on the scenario that w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:26 AM
1

If incels just wanted to "fuck some girl" they would simply fuck a hooker/escort and be done with it instead of suffering for decades genius
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:08 AM
1

Tricky question. It's undeniable that women live on tutorial mode. But even on tutorial mode you need to be able to play. Most women are as bluepilled about relationships as men, and make all the wrong choices, then end up unhappy. Still, nowhere near as unhappy as men, so yeah. Totally betraying my gender, hook me up to the GYNOMACHINE
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:06 AM
3

Sub numbers are like "registered account" numbers in MMORPGs. This only tells you how many people ever tried the game, not how many are actually playing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:04 AM
2

"The Red Pill" which was all about MRA... lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:03 AM
1

You don't have to marry to not be alone. Not that it changes your message really. "Being married to a bitch landwhale" and "Cohabitating with a bitchy landwhale", choices, choices...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 08:02 AM
1

What a stupid thread. "Ex-cripples who had their limbs re-attached, what's your story?" Either there's no story or you weren't a cripple to begin with
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 07:59 AM
2

They're not in it for the "love", they want to fuck some girl. Not even a bluepiller would be this wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 07:58 AM
5

If they're both not physically attracted to each other It takes only one.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 07:56 AM
4

LOL this thread. As usual, when you confront the bluepillers with simply logic and deny them their platitudes, they have absolutely nothing of value to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 07:54 AM
0

The problem seems to be that single men can't seem to create a sane and stable community in which to air their grievances and get advice in any sort of healthy way. Okay then, let's say people create /r/saneincels where they "air their grievances and get advice in a healthy way in a sane and stable community" - whatever the fuck that means. What sort of advice would you give them? What sort of advice would get posted there? How would it differ from that what OP already mentioned that most of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 07:50 AM
1

However, MRP fails miserably with their dread game, as it's nothing but trying to negotiate desire. No, going to counseling is trying to negotiate desire. Dread game is "take it or leave it". It's the very opposite of negotiating. I'm not going back to TRP, but damn, I'm not falling for the feminist agenda either. Where do I go. /r/deadbedrooms until you learn to stop letting your stupid morality get in the way
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 07:45 AM
1

certainly more autistic than adhd
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 06:09 PM
0

ye
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 06:09 PM
0

It makes no evolutionary sense and no other animal exhibits this behaviour. You also did not actually prove it in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 07:13 AM
-1

If you didn't get laid by the end of college then it's over.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 07:12 AM
3

Why is your nickname "HopefulAboutADHD" when you basically have autism?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 07:07 AM
4

You wouldn't be paying child support if you were actually involved as a parent, geez. lol what
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 07:05 AM
1

I have no idea what you're even talking about. "Normal cis men" don't dress up in any female clothing they can find and imagine how it's like to have tits in front of a mirror. If you do that, you're already an autogynephile. And depending on how big of a kink it is for you, it certainly might be a reason to go full trans. What the hell do 3rd wave feminists(who, by the way, largely hate transwomen) have to do with it? FWIW, I believe most of transwomen are really just guys with autogynephilia. …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/17 06:57 AM
1

Edit: this includes yard work and everything house related. Heh, in that case I'd assume men do 80% of housework all things considered, at least where I live(eastern europe)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 02:54 PM
1

Shame you tagged it as CMV, I think that is seriously hurting the discussion - though not as much as how stupid most of PPD seems to be about transsexuality. I cannot CMV, quite the opposite, I can offer you an observation very similar to yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 07:06 AM
3

Uh you do realize mental disorders don't work that way? It isn't some kind of RPG where every mental disorder gets you -10 to Rationality stat.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 07:01 AM
1

a discussion between /u/mgtownigga and /u/wtknight light against darkness DUEL OF FATES
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 06:55 AM
1

Nice guy - hangs around and does stuff for a girl he likes and would rather delude himself in to thinking she might be into him instead of making a move and perhaps facing rejection. How does that fit into bluepill narrative of "Nice Guys" getting aggressive after being rejected? lol when you're in so many layers of bullshit you end up contradicting yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/17 06:53 AM
1

It starts good, then turns into... I don't know what exactly. The Y-DNA bottleneck and monogamy is one and the same. It's just that the first few "men" who figured out agriculture completely mogged everyone else. Then they took care of their own sons, who took care of their sons, all the way down until it stabilized at 1:1 male/female ratio. And how Nice Guys, TM or not, factor into all this - I can't even fathom. But of course, then industrial revolution happens, women get jobs, hypergamy stops…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:37 PM
1

Your definition of Nice Guy is wrong, therefore your entire comparison is wrong. You also contradicted yourself slightly in your own damn post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:32 PM
1

I'll say that height is attractive in males then
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 04:30 PM
1

So if you're drinking yourself into a stupor every second day it's not a substance abuse disorder if you do it alone in your room?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 02:46 PM
1

I am fairly certain most men can grow facial hair after puberty. I am also fairly certain that for most boys, puberty is overy by the end of high school.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 11:22 AM
1

Then their work is to become either AB or BF, and all men can achieve this. That's like saying "anyone can get rich if only they work hard" or "if you eat healthy and exercise you will never be sick". Nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 08:02 AM
2

Minor point: Plato had a wrestling coach and supposedly was pretty buff himself. One of the theories behind his "nickname" was that Platon was greek for broad.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 08:00 AM
1

There is also a correlation between IQ and likelihood of being a virgin at any age compared to your peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:57 AM
1

whereas men have normalized bell-curves in what they consider attractive AS IT SHOULD BE. It would make no evolutionary sense if both men and women had "no standards". Someone must be picky, and so it is in the entire animal kingdom. For humans(and actually almost all, if not all, animals), females are the picky gender. AS IT SHOULD BE.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:54 AM
1

There is no such thing as "double standard" when you're talking about two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:50 AM
2

I mean, technically even masturbation is only for incels. If men could have sex whenever they want, they wound never masturbate. So when men masturbate, it's to replace the sex they can't get, so it's "invulntary" "celibate".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:49 AM
1

There are probably some men out there. Probably not many. Try googling it and you'll quickly learn that it's pretty universal. And it's not about "believing".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:46 AM
1

I've been thinking about it the other day, but for women even having deficiences, flaws and shortcomings is often an advantage, or at least it "doesn't matter". It will be seen as cute or endearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:45 AM
1

Weird high school...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:42 AM
5

Literally everyone. All humans. All over the world. Not just "anglosphere west".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:40 AM
4

Incels and some of the more snowflakey terps consistently claim that a woman not wanting to fuck or date a dude means that she hates him, thinks she's better than him, wishes ill will upon them, etc. The general consensus of Incels, if there even is such a thing, is that women literally do not realize/notice their existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:39 AM
16

I mean, if she gets off of a 14" dong, and I'm not even half of that, sorry I guess we're not meant to be together Actually it seems you're not meant to be togther with humans in general, try a horse
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:34 AM
7

Antisocial persoality and substance abuse don't make "others" suffer any more than anxiety and mood disorders.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/17 07:31 AM
7

If that were a thing, it would be the other way around. Lesbians are more likely to be nerdy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:26 PM
2

"Nice Guys"(note the caps) is a term created by feminists to rationalize/obfuscate the nice guy paradox: while most women will say that they want to date a nice guy, in reality, almost none of them do. The truth is that, of course, women don't actually want to date nice guys, and being nice is a tetriary characteristic at best when it comes to male attractiveness. Usually it doesn't matter at all how "nice" you are, and quite often being nice can actually make you less attractive in the eyes of …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:24 PM
0

lol this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 02:22 PM
7

It's effortless if you're attractive. And if you're not attractive... it's probably fake anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 10:46 AM
3

Are you serious right now
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 09:09 AM
1

Yeah, well, if a woman fucks a man she's not actually attracted to, why she would orgasm?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 08:37 AM
1

Women dont really need to try unless they all go for Chads I mean, they DO all go for Chads though...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:33 AM
4

lol, this reminds me of that famous(well, in manosphere) Hillary Clinton quote: Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. So I could paraphrase: women have always been the primary victims of divorce...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:32 AM
2

I am going to go all radical here(for a black/redpiller) and say men and women feel love the same. The difference in the way they approach and express it simply stems from the different ways in which men and women approach relationships. Love isn't anything special, it's just the regular old sexual attraction in overdive, so the usual rules apply.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:28 AM
3

There is no such thing as Nice Guy(TM) to begin with. It's a conspiracy theory to shift blame from female to male behaviour. As usual. It's staggering to me that people still think it's a thing. If this were a mainstream sub then maybe, but someone who wants to discuss human sexuality believing in Nice Guys(TM) is like someone who wants to discuss geology but believes in Flat Earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:24 AM
1

500 generatons is nothing evolutionarily-wise, at least not when changing something as basic as sexual instinct. But taking your topic on its own, without the body of the post: absolutely. All the beta and omega males in human society were never supposed to reproduce. Survival of the fittest starts with mate selection. In humans and most other animals, the female picks the best available male, and the rest are supposed to die without ever passing on their genes. So in a way, civilization is the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 07:21 AM
2

I think you vastly overestimate how much people really compare themselves to "the Internet". That's like comparing yourself to celebrities. Nobody does that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 02:53 PM
2

tl;dr - IT'S ALL MEN'S FAULT
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 11:25 AM
3

Everything is debatable, everything is bullshit, and you have to point it all out!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 08:49 AM
3

There are many reasons. Because being a single mother is 19/20 the single mother's fault in one way or another. Because men don't want to raise another men's children. Because single mothers usually mean alimony, which rightfully scares the shit out of most men. Because they are leeches on society, and men have to pay(in taxes) for their stupidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 08:47 AM
3

TRP only works for betas, and even then the ones in the 6-8 range. They don't need TRP, they need just the regular red pill. From there they can take a good hard look at themselves and decide their fate: TRP, MGTOW, or LDAR.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 08:41 AM
7

Women also work to be attractive. What is this, the nineties?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 08:37 AM
1

Men do hypergamy? News to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 05:11 AM
1

We're drastically different from our cavemen counterparts No.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 02:50 PM
1

In context of AFBB, we aren't talking about school, we are talking about women hitting the wall and settling with beta bux. If being ~30 is not "mature enough" then what fucking is?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 02:46 PM
1

Your amusing leftist bias aside, it's nice to have another confirmation that AHALT and therefore, biological determinism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 02:40 PM
1

On the one hand there are some who claim that she will absolutely cheat on you with a better man if she's no longer a virgin It's not like hypergamy is exclusive to sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 02:37 PM
12

I believe that they are confusing looking out for yourself and taking care of your own life with being an "asshole" for the same reason that they confuse supplication and doing a girls homework with kindness and magnanimity. I believe this stems directly from self loathing and they could start correcting these mistaken red pill assumptions by building up a core of self love. Except it's irrelevant if you're confident bordering on arrogant because you're just that amazing and you know it, or if y…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 02:32 PM
1

What part of the Sims is a "core game"?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 10:49 AM
0

More like you're calling things that are not games, games.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 08:36 AM
3

It's ironic - creating high quality games specifically for a female audience is a vast untapped market No it isn't. Women don't care about games. Women never cared about games. How many men watch male soccer league, versus how many women watch female soccer league? Women never gave a shit about competition, challenge, proving yourself. That's why, when women actually DO play games, they're casual trash that your granma would be interested in, without any of those things. Colttaine did a video on…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 07:40 AM
1

Does anyone know what OP's point was in his post?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 07:31 AM
1

Doesn't matter for nature. It's better to have one extra attempt at a child at higher failure risk than no attempt at all. It's baffling to me how can anyone deny that humans are biologically set to fuck pubestent girls. Human males/females are primarily attracted to secondary sexual characteristics, which develop exactly during puberty. And when do human females become fertile? Why, during puberty. So when, logically, is the human animal set for the start of reproduction? "Ten years after puber…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 07:29 AM
3

On bad days, sometimes I think women are incapable of genuine affection. However, when I have my head on straight, I realize I'm just incapable of comprehending it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depressive_realism Thank god for those "head on straight" moments that let you delude yourself into happiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 07:23 AM
2

What? Women are more attracted to men that sleep around, not less.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 07:21 AM
0

Not everyone is right for each other. Whatever excuse works for you bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 07:16 AM
1

You're still kind of painting them as "broken people" who cannot bond through sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 05:16 AM
2

But remember, "blue pill" doesn't exist, it's just common knowledge and LOL who ever told you that women want nice guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 05:18 AM
2

The way I see it, sex is a bonding thing. When you have sex with a bunch of different people, it stops being a bonding thing and starts being just something you do for fun, at the level of, say, a match of squash(something liberals love to celebrate, because liberalism is mostly just thinly veiled hedonism) I will freely admit hovewer that biologically speaking, women are wired for serial monogamy. So it's probably just my fee-fees talking. It's when sluts become sluts for the wrong reasons that…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 05:10 AM
2

Critics of the Google Manifesto do not realize a whole lot of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 05:07 AM
1

like a woman reeling in an unattractive beta bucks, isn't really winning because she will be miserable. Eh. She can still keep fucking on the side.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 04:34 AM
3

Every human society is gynocentric.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 04:30 PM
3

Happiness Treadmill makes talking about happiness in absolute terms pretty difficult. So how about we define "happy" as "happier than men". Do you still disagree then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:38 AM
6

That's just moving the goalposts. How are they unhappy? Do you have a proof of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:36 AM
2

But 'emotionally distant' is a common complaint from women. So is "asshole". Then they date assholes. Then the assholes beat them up and they still date them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:35 AM
7

Are they though. If there's one thing I've learned from all these pills, it's that women always win in the end. I mean, in a gynocentric society, how could it be any different?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:24 AM
8

How can you even spew out that self-contradicting nonsense and not notice it lol. So explain to me, how to open up emotionally as a man without "acting like a whiny bitch", because I fail to see how this could be - at best - 100% subjective. (At worst, plain impossible; reminds me of that other mega-thread we had on the topic, where everyone agreed that it's okay for men to open up about their feelings... as long as they keep frame about it and then move on like nothing happened)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:21 AM
1

Only logical explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:18 AM
8

You're not in competition to look better than women, you're in competition to look better than other men... Sorry, but all signs point to female hypergamy being "better than me" rather than "better than other men". If that wasn't the case, women wouldn't loathe out-earning men so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:10 AM
9

Men aren't desperate in Japan You can't be serious. I know it's pretty common to misunderstand what's happening in Japanese society, but to try and turn it around into a success? What the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:09 AM
0

because that would be trying to negotiate their attraction, that's not allowed Try "not possible"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 10:08 AM
1

Redhead men are ugly
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 09:58 AM
1

If a guy wants a reasonable, smart, non-crazy woman, that's also having normal standards. this guy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 02:04 AM
1

The only reason why you can't say women are "inherently evil" is because "evil" is subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 08:26 AM
1

It is fucking baffling how bad this post is, and how upvoted it is(then again, not really, since PPD is bluepill as fuck so they love this kind of nonsense) Let me list some of the biggest offenders: "communication" meme(no, it's not about communication, unless you want a flatmate instead of SO) dependency being a bad thing, even though it was the golden standad for few millenia nad everyone loved it Even now we have multiple subreddits and movements full of one sex blaming the other sex for all…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 08:12 AM
2

lack of standards But when he does have standards, he's an entitled shitlord.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 07:58 AM
1

y wat
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 04:17 PM
8

Click the link to the study. Read the abstract. Stop relying on bullshit leftist propaganda sites.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 04:07 PM
0

All of them are "ok". If they weren't "ok" they wouldn't exist to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 04:01 PM
0

And blackpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 04:01 PM
2

Generalizing is sexist oh okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 03:53 PM
1

I'm an introvert and still enjoy socialising. I honestly have no answer to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:50 AM
1

So we've reached the point where you dig through someone's post history in order to "win the argument" with one of the most pathetic forms of ad hominem logical fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:50 AM
1

Because that's the most likely outcome given the circumstances and their life (gasp) history. Then again as a bluepiller you probably don't believe that past actions are predictors for future behaviour. Every day is just a d20 roll.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:48 AM
1

Practice socialising. It's called social skills for a reason. Skills are learned behaviours. I'll let all the introverts know immediately. Thanks for following my example with depression to the dot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:46 AM
2

Practice what exactly, and why does it sound so much like telling depressed people to just smile more?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:40 AM
1

To be clear, it is relevant to the OP, though, right? Not at all. Well, it might be in the global sense, since it basically boils down to "biological determinism"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:39 AM
1

There's literally data on the front page right now, which you've seen, that says past the age of 25 this balances out and getting laid becomes much easier for guys. Yeah, and I addressed that. One of bluepill's (many) mistakes is assuming that every relationship is a happy one. Or even tolerable one. Though I guess that in case of that thread, it was the idea that getting laid once somehow means you're now Chad Thundercock.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:39 AM
1

Bisexual men are often very powerful. More like the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:36 AM
2

Most people against death penalty say so because "what if they were not guilty after all". Rehabilitation has nothing to do with it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:35 AM
1

article ripped from HuffPo, your guys thoughts? My thought is that the article is ripped from HuffPo
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 10:33 AM
0

Thank you for your virtue signalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:25 AM
1

Tone down the dramatics, at 21 your not staring down the barrel of anything for the rest of your lives You literally are. In US, at 21 you've finished high school and are mostly through college. These are the two places where getting a girlfriend is the easiest. Then you get a job, a job likely full only of other men, that takes most of your time, and you have to put a lot of active effort to even meet women at all, that you have no time for, and your looks likely deteriorate for many reasons. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:20 AM
1

Because they help avoid his actual problem, which is that he's too uptight and not social and fun. Right, except unless you want to be buzzed or on weed 24/7, there is no solution to being "too uptight and not social and fun". What the fuck should he do then? "Just chill out bro"? Learn 1000 jokes and spend his entire life pretending to be the funny guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:18 AM
1

Another poster just reminded me that I also agree that prison rape should be horrifying, not stand up comedy material. Don't tell me what to laugh at.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:12 AM
1

lol are you really going to do it? Start with Biology, Culture, Ideology. If that won't work for you, the rest won't either.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:10 AM
2

You mock, but how about all the female erotica where the (super handsome, rich, muscular, hairy, etc.) "bad boy" male is somehow "tamed" and "transformed" by a 5/10 low rank accountant?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:08 AM
2

Um hello, girls know what they want. Ehue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:07 AM
4

Ironically, it's much more likely that there is no such thing as a straight woman. 20% of women watch lesbian porn, and studies have shown most women get aroused with both heterosexual and homosexual imagery.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:04 AM
1

Thread two is most of the typical sexist bullshit you see. In stark contrast, this one is entirely about women and nothing about self improvement. A brief summary is that women are hardwired to seek masculine men who can provide resources, and will always be tempted to cheat if she finds a better man. Well, duh. But how is this sexist? Would you consider something like "All men are horny apes, made by nature to fuck almost anything" sexist as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:03 AM
4

Make sure you watch The Choice (2016) before you answer these questions! :) Make sure you watch all of Colttaine's videos on YouTube before you start making any more dumb threads
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 09:01 AM
1

Don't play dumb. Not every interaction is leader/follower. Okay, okay, I dreamed that whole study up. We are all beautiful equal snowflakes, oh if only we could hold each other's hands and work together instead of f=ewreitnowgbgfvc
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 08:49 AM
1

and plenty mature into better people throughout life, in fact I'd say this is the norm. ha ha
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 08:06 AM
1

Well that's just not true. In a partnership, two people are working to the same goal, there's no master/slave or parent/child dynamic. There is a leader and a follower. If there isn't, conflicts arise. There are such things as teams which work together to achieve a common goal (see sports). See captains. This reeks of male insecurity. Pressure placed on oneself to reach a certain artificial ideal. So insecurity is now a motivating factor? That's why I laugh at people who use that word. I.e. you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 07:41 AM
1

Someone has to be in charge, yes. This applies to literally all human relationships by the way, not just romantic ones. And since women hate submissive men, and men like submissive women, this naturally leads itself to the man being in charge.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 05:35 AM
1

What doesn't make it uncomfortable when the lead in the relationship doesn't actually have the lead?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 05:04 AM
0

Highly unlikely. If they had the willpower or otherwise ability to overcome their loser status, they wouldn't be a loser to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/17 05:02 AM
1

I cannot answer a question based on an invalid premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 03:29 PM
2

You are still missing the point, which is, "insecurity" is a meaningless buzzword. Not that it would help you even if it wasn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 03:22 PM
2

"insecure" non-speak Wow, blast from the past
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 03:18 PM
3

Again, because men don't just magically become more attractive as they get older. Well, they almost don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 03:08 PM
5

It's one possible explanation out of a myriad of them And the most probable one.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:59 PM
13

I am just explaining to you why "oh, but they're getting sex now so they changed, see!" is hardly an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:50 PM
18

I don't think you realize just how broad of a category "getting sex" is. A stereotypical Chad who bangs two dfferent girls every friday and saturday, and has two extra plates on standby for the rest of the week, is "getting sex" A 33-year-old loser, who got married at 28 to a post-wall woman, who after five years of marriage fucks him twice a month when she really really cannot stand the itch anymore, is also "gettings sex"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:45 PM
18

How can you possibly know that? But to answer your question: because nothing changes between a 20 year old loser and 28 year old loser. They're still equally unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:38 PM
1

Every person, whether they're male or female, has the power to change their situation yet the majority of people are only intent on blaming the opposite sex by coming to a gross oversimplification of how they are, as if they're preprogrammed robots that will always follow a script based on their gender. The reality is men and women are more alike than they'd like to admit. and into the trashcan you go
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:31 PM
19

See /u/Il128's post. These aren't "late bloomers", they're beta bucks, trading one doom(being forever alone) for another(locking themselves in a relationship with a woman who can't stand them)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:26 PM
2

While it's not quite the 80/20 phenomenon mentioned on TRP It takes time for the weave of monogamy to unravel. But we're getting there, slowly but surely.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:25 PM
1

Evolutionarily speaking, they should at least not care.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:25 PM
0

The "games are childish - grow up, manchildren!" comes from the shitty, outdated gender role that a man who has interests beyond work or family or that he can participate in by himself is somehow broken, and failing to contribute to society. Or, you know, it's because most games are childish, stupid wastes of time. Or because games are escapism, and only losers do escapism. It's interesting to note that anything involving solitary men is almost always derided as weird, creepy, or just plain sad.…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:23 PM
2

No, and frankly speaking I laugh at your idea that "a lot of men wouldn't care". And it doesn't take long to find studies that confirm men don't want women earning more. Even if they are done by retards who want to sell it as "outdated gender norms".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 02:16 PM
1

We can't accurately ascertain how much influence is nature and how much is nurture in the formative years of a child's upbringing in a gender-stratified society. It's 100% nature, because even if it is nurture, said nurture was shaped by nature to begin with. Now go, and be enlightened
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 08:18 AM
0

While both boys and girls begin life equal, they are then raised from birth to be different. Do I even need to read further?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 08:16 AM
2

It's "marrying up" because the definition was created in the context of marriage being the main form of romantic relationship between men and women. Needless to say, it applies to regular dating just as well, since the mechanics are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 05:02 AM
1

Should be legal, but is also not the answer. I mean, you might as well just jack off, since it has exactly the same effect in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 04:00 PM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergamy oh wait not sarcastically condescending enough http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Hypergamy thar u go
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 03:57 PM
5

Because they can just as well "drink, dance and chat with their friends" at home, genius. The entire point of a club is to "meet other people" AKA hook up with strangers. If you somehow didn't figure that out in your 14 years of clubgoing, that's pretty fucking laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 08:08 AM
3

I'm not a Chad. How would you know
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 08:05 AM
2

Why wouldn't you listen to someone who is wildly successful? Usually because they have no idea why they are successful. When talking finances, for example, you should be listening to the self-made millionaire. Not someone who inherited their fortune from their parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 08:04 AM
1

Men (at all ages) are preferentially attracted to women in their early to late 20s. Try mid to late teens lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 03:58 PM
1

So you're saying that TRP keeps company with ~80% of male populace. What a bias
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 03:36 PM
2

Why are your post's always so long. And why are you discussing reddit with your brother? Im embarrassed to tell anyone i even visit reddit. Why are your posts always so long? Why are you discussing reddit with your brother? ftfy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 03:35 PM
1

According to Wikipedia, GvC applied to all contraception, not just female ones. It is also worth remembering that these laws follow societal changes, not the other way around. Roe v. Wade might have legalized abortion, but women were getting abortions in hundreds of thousands long before it(at work, can't dig out the link, sorry)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 05:08 AM
1

Is AF/BB a myth? I thought that AF/BB had a lot of truth to it. There are two kinds of AFBB. One says that women seek different men for reproduction and different men for taking care of children. The other says that women will fuck alphas a lot when young, then settle with a beta when old, and is closely related to the idea of the Wall. The former is nonsense, the latter is not. Do you not think that throughout history we've had an incredibly male-dominated society/culture, with changes in that …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 09:21 AM
1

What percentage of female attraction is based on physical traits? 32.76% What do you mean by this exactly? The myth of romantic female, the myth of nice guys, the myth of AFBB, etc. This is the "feminine mystique," right? Yes. What are you referring to here? To how women will often say one thing when they actually want a completely different thing. This is an intriguing statement; can you flesh it out a bit more? Male status, or "the whole package" rather than just "Dayum I would rail that ass s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 05:28 AM
3

I still say the pill is a red herring. Hello? We had contraceptives before the pill. We even had contraceptives before contraceptives(schedule, pulling out, oral, anal) All the pill is, is just convenient(both as a contraceptive, and as a scapegoat) Granted, the pill does change behaviour of the person using it - slightly. I remember /u/girlwriteswhat had a funny theory: normally, women are not attracted to men that are similar to them genetically. This is likely a way to guard against incest, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:53 AM
1

"Shallow" is just a classic way of feminists to bash men. It stems from the fact that male attraction is very simple and easy to predict(since it's 90% simple physical sexual attraction) while female attraction was misunderstood through the entirety of history(remember all these cultural memes how women are unfathomable, "no means yes", men are from mars and women are from phobos and deimos, etc.) and is focused more on the context of the male. Then, because human society is gynocentric, men joi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:29 AM
2

I see the hamster wheel of "NiceGuy(tm)" never stops spinning. Apparently now "NiceGuys(tm)" are hanging out in bars, using intrusive PUA tactics to pick up chicks. Where will the wheel take us next? I can't wait!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:21 AM
2

...obviously? It's the men, specifically bluepill men, who think women are all sugar and spice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 04:29 PM
5

I meant your projecting of women as innocent, prudish maidens.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 03:12 PM
7

Sounds like some serious projecting on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 03:05 PM
3

But something I been wondering with so many women being into rape play is how many would be into free use (WARNING NFSW). I can back it up with this classic. Sort by top. Which, incidentally, is one of the most redpill things I've ever seen. Here's your goddamn romantic gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 03:04 PM
1

It didn't. And we literally did tests on this shit. Like, three days old babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 02:23 PM
2

Skimming. See this line: Femininity and masculinity, in this view, are not innate qualities but learned constructs and acquired habits. Disregard entire post as "Social studies" nonsense. Well, not that this "theory" would be of any use to anyone even if it were true, especially in context of PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 05:41 AM
5

Ring guy. Women are attracted to men that already get women. It's the "rich get richer" of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 05:38 AM
1

What is "vetting"?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 05:35 AM
2

The question is whether male happiness decreased as well. But no, you're right - war in Afghanistan is the reason why women are unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 05:33 AM
1

Women were unhappy enough in the past to pass Prohibition, for instance. What?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 05:31 AM
1

Most of this is a load of old-timey bullshit Oh, if you say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 05:30 AM
1

Wow! A Neuroscientist! So she must be an expert on psychology! And she's FEMALE, so she's an expert on women! What the fuck is this nonsense. You could go to /r/askreddit and get same list rofl. And it would be equally enlightening.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 05:29 AM
1

Change how? "Genie magic change" or within realm of possibility(trans)? Magic change, absolutely. Trans, well I did not trans so there's your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 12:46 PM
2

or your current life to 80 Well that's a balanced question...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 12:45 PM
1

Who really has a higher chance of success with women, men who are attractive to women or men who are not? I wonder
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 08:31 AM
1

Note that most blues here are happily partnered Ha ha.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 08:30 AM
3

From top to bottom: status, status and status. Wealth is status. Looks give you status(Halo Effect), especially important for first, second and third impressions. Game? Basically pretend-status.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 08:26 AM
2

So /r/incels is full of alphas? wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 08:24 AM
1

...honestly that's like asking what do men get from fucking hot women. They are sexually attracted to them -> they fuck them. What else would they need? I mean, do you really think everything women do and every sex they have is in order to "secure resources"?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/17 08:24 AM
5

Okay, attractive men. Better, or do I really have to explain how having of shitload of social power and status is attractive to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/17 08:06 AM
1

Sure. It's also Fnurglevitz, fgsfds, and DSFAARGEG. These are words that are made up, in case you're wondering. I mean holy shit, how can you read something like "ignoring someone's feelings is abuse" and take it remotely seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/17 08:05 AM
3

Crazy has different definitions with men and with women: Why the thread then, if you realize where you made your mistake?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/17 08:01 AM
3

Why wouldn't it work exactly the same as for the 99%? Women bang hot men, because they are attracted to them. That's the "transaction".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/17 08:00 AM
1

I quoted you quoting that. Do you really think 5-10% difference is so much? Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 03:07 PM
1

Which proves that women prefer LTRs how exactly? About 30% of men reported being in casual relationship ; almost 50% dating exclusively About 20% of women reported being in casual relationship ; almost 50% dating exclusively That is amazingly even.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 01:51 PM
2

And again we go back to the matter of a source...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 01:44 PM
1

A meaningful and trustworthy partnership? Set up the ideal environment for having kids down the line? Why do these not apply to men then? Do they not want a "meaningful and trustworthy partnership"? And don't want to set up ideal environment for having kids down the line?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 01:29 PM
1

Well, Chads are.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 01:14 PM
1

They're trained to be obedient, meek yes-men to their boss and all other "superiors", which includes i.e. everyone older than them. Strawman this hovewer the fuck you want, but these are not attractive traits for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 01:08 PM
1

Asian culture, with its focus on collectivism and shutting up and doing your job, is a steamroller of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 12:56 PM
2

This is about casual sex though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 12:09 PM
2

Because many women are interested in long term companionship Can you prove that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 11:27 AM
1

The other day I "went back to the basics" and read the Wikipedia page about physical attraction. The tl;dr was this: men are attracted to feminine traits, and women are attracted to masculine traits. Funny how that works, huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 10:00 AM
5

Yeah, you're lucky that the chart started at 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 09:58 AM
1

So who are you going to believe OP? "General populace" of /r/askwomen or literally crazy inhabitants of /r/purplepilldebate?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 09:57 AM
3

OKCupid data. Female version
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 09:52 AM
1

What it is: platitude What it isn't: functional advice
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 09:52 AM
2

Why would women be seeking LTRs?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 09:51 AM
6

If I had to throw out a wild guess, I'd say men are probably attracted to about a quarter of qualifiable women (ie, around their age) Heh.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 09:49 AM
1

Is that what you tried? No. I'm not an anime character. Your blind lashing and desperate attempts to turn every argument into ad hominem are disappointing and boring.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 06:46 AM
1

So much of the bluepill wishes to be called master, and have a rotating collection of sex slaves to feed to the demon - wouldn't you agree? I would absolutely agree. "Just be yourself(borig, average, mediocre, wageslave beta) and super hot girl(s) will(sometimes literally) fall of the sky and unconditionally fall in love with you" is every bluepiller's wet dream. And so, that's what anime gives them. No idea why you're dragging hentai into it, hentai is porn. Porn follows its own rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 05:11 AM
1

Masculine behaviour does not vary between cultures. That would make no evolutionary sense. The proof is in the non-existant Japanese birth rates and 40% of <30 japanese males being virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 05:06 AM
1

Being a niceguyTM is not blue pill. There is no such thing as "niceguyTM".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/17 05:04 AM
1

Someone already pointed it out, I don't know if it was this thread or one of the five other threads, but it's mostly done by negative association. Women love to tell everyone how much they hate manipulative jerks, assholes, misogynist pigs, etc. - so logically, what they really want is nice guys, right? "Look at what they do, not at what they say" is a lesson most people(men or women) have not learned.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 04:38 PM
1

It's not just harems, all anime is bluepill as fuck. Which is no surprise, since it's aimed at beta/omega males; they're the target audience, and anime is trash popculture, and the two rules of trash popculture is 1. make the audience identify with the main character and 2. let the main character experience what the audience dreams of. (On a side, personal attack note, it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that you watch that irredeemable trash)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 04:33 PM
3

This thread
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 01:46 PM
15

"Nice Guys" is a lie made up by feminists/SJWs to cover the paradox of how feminists/SJWs tell all men that women want nice guys, when in reality nice guys can't get any relationships at all. Therefore, rather than admit they're wrong, feminists/SJWs created a conspiracy theory how all nice guys who cannot get relationships(which, again, is all of them) are actually not nice at all, but secretly horrible people who only pretend to be nice to get into women's pants. Because nothing says "Pussy Sl…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 01:39 PM
3

Now read that again, but slowly; Whom is it that the women get such support from? Society as a whole. If it's specifically from women, you're not quoting it. Neither it does matter, because women are not friends with all other women. Everyone knows that when a woman drops "I feel so ugly today :(" on instagram, she will immediately get hundreds of posts of support from complete strangers. This does not reflect on quality of female friendships in any way whatsoever. Same, but opposite, for men. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 09:14 AM
1

But what "fatherhood crisis" are we talking about? OP said "fatherhood crisis" in the title, but the body doesn't talk about it at all. Unless OP implies that the piddly amounts of men who try being RP somehow cause a "fatherhood crisis", which is simply laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 09:09 AM
3

a young woman with an average or above body and a halfway decent face and who otherwise has minimum wage job skills, has a very, very lucrative career as a ...wife? Girlfriend? Why would a woman with these specs ever resort to prostitution lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 09:04 AM
2

Get into findom. You set up a cam and men give you money for not getting naked. Instead, you call them losers for giving you money for nothing. And they will give you more money for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 09:01 AM
3

That's 25% price increase! This guy knows his worth
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:58 AM
2

Prositution is illegal because gynocentrism. Obviously prostitution hurts all women(but remember, you cannot judge a woman by her partner count, that's sexist) so we must prevent it. All prostitutes are "broken women" who would have never ever done so if they didn't absolutely have to, because women are all pure perfect angels. So we have to protect the poor wimminz. By outlawing prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:57 AM
1

I mean, they can be friends if, for whatever reason, they are not sexually attracted to one another. Or if they just like being orbiters.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:54 AM
1

I'm not tho
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:52 AM
2

So did you literally never heard of the Tinder/OKC data that shows women rate 80% of men as below average, or did you deliberately ignore it for whatever crazy reason? Because it literally is the answer to your "question".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:52 AM
1

What are the implications of this? Another proof that human mate selection is still the same as it was in stone age?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:49 AM
2

Why, because it's trite tripe but "feels good", even as it says absolutely nothing of substance?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:47 AM
3

When I was writing my magnum opus(lol) I briefly considered linking to sources. I don't have sources for all claims in that post, but I could dig out a good chunk of them. But why the fuck bother? A single study is not going to change anyone's mind. A single study shouldn't even change anyone's mind because a single study proves almost nothing; you can find a single(or several) study supporting any crazy theory you want. Real science is based on scientific consensus which is based on dozens and …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:45 AM
3

Your entire first quote block basically says that women get constant social approval, attention and help. And men don't get jack shit. From this, you somehow conclude that women's friendships are more fulfilling, and male friendships suck. None of this makes any sense whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 08:37 AM
1

A lot of men in their 40s, 50s, and 60s only want women over 35 or so for serious relationships I wonder about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/17 05:10 AM
1

Actual TRP dating advice will only help 6/10 or higher betas. Meanwhile everyone, even 1/10 incels can benefit from the improved confidence and health that comes with "lifting"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/17 10:05 AM
2

Too much wrong with this to bother addressing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/17 10:01 AM
4

The wall is just red pill cope. Well the wall as a revenge fantasy is absolute cope, but at the same time, you yourself admit that women's options drastically diminish with age in your example.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/17 09:50 AM
1

Considering the entire japanese culture is basically set to mass-produce betas, I think it's a pretty reasonable assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/17 05:38 AM
1

Just incels being incels?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 06:32 PM
2

I think most people greatly overestimate, or dare I say romaticize, the whole herbivore guys thing. If it even exists in any capacity at all, because attempts at tracking the source always end up in few vague news articles that cite no sources. I mean, these guys are basically incels. You can try and sell it as some kind of bold rejection of social norms, but if they were just rejecting "working themselves to death for a family he'll never see and won't appreciate him", then... they would do jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 06:18 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wpca1ZDIRQ roughly from 2 minutes on.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 06:06 PM
2

I mean, if all you have as data is Reddit threads, then...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 04:28 AM
0

I am just having a hard time seeing this. I get how a woman marrying a more attractive man would want to make her self better looking. But I don't see it bringing negative consequences here as I would think she would benefit more than be harm by it. As say she is tad bit overweight and she marries a guy more attractive than her. That likely get her to work out and lose the weight in order to be as or more attractive than him. Hahaha what? No, see, once she marries(or otherwise steady LTRs) him t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 04:24 AM
3

lol what? "forming families and creating rituals"? What kind of retarded measure of "strength" is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 04:22 AM
1

Born to a wealthy middle-class family in Simbirsk, Tell me more about how oppressed Lenin was. I don't know that much about commie nonsense, but weren't Marx and Engels well off too?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 04:20 AM
2

Yes, ask us a question that requires extensive knowledge about your personal relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 04:16 AM
1

Well, if your attitude is "every male who's ever had sex is a winner", sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 03:26 AM
1

The image you're constructing of a man desperate for anyone to fuck them and then dying alone or settling for scraps is not the experience of the average man. Why wouldn't it be? Neither of us has any data, but the concept of hypergamy alone means that's exactly how life of an average man should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:25 AM
1

Well, if your attitude is "every male who's ever had sex is a winner", sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:16 AM
1

How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:10 AM
2

Yes, most men manage to get lucky with several girls, none of which will want them for an extended period of time, and eventually get unhappily married/LTRed with a post-wall woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:08 AM
1

How old are the women you're aiming for if they don't bring adolescent drama with them? 30+?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:06 AM
1

as I see young girls are actually more inclined to not care about how they look. Dunno where you live, because over here it's pretty standard for 13-14 yo girls to start wearing earrings and touching themselves up with makeup. And have you considered the possibility that younger girls "take care of themselves less" because they're younger and thus naturally look more attractive? You don't need to repaint your face if your face doesn't suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:04 AM
1

Hold that frame as you're literally drowning, you betabux.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:02 AM
7

amused mastery online Sounds like some kind of shitty asian MMO
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:01 AM
1

3/10 + makeup = 5/10 easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 06:00 AM
2

Women's sexual and political liberation is a net positive for everyone except for the weakest men. "Weakest men" being 80% of male populace?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 05:59 AM
6

You know how these guys complain about TV shows, how for decades it's been dumb, homely husbands with smart beautiful wives? Yeah, they were doing that to appeal to you, idiot, not women. They were doing that because you need a comedic duo, and having the woman be a hopeless loser is public(and possibly legal) suicide. Women are now socially/economically free, to be the shit heads half of men have always been. The difference is, men are told to step up or shut up, and to own their shit. Meanwhil…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 05:58 AM
3

They banned me, because it's "moralizing". :) Well, good. It is moralizing. Go back to /r/punchingmorpheus.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 05:55 AM
1

You have absolutely no idea how evolution works, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 07:03 AM
1

most fathered children with one But they didn't. Try 80% of offspring being alpha's and 20% being "the rest". And that's not how evolution works anyways. I'm not even sure what your example is trying to prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 06:49 AM
1

A base trait like this? Probably hundreds of thousands.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 05:08 AM
1

How does it not pose an evolutionary advantage though? Being a narcissist will get you status/power so...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 04:07 PM
2

At this point I don't even know if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 03:59 PM
2

Are you being obtuse on purpose? If you tell someone every year you volunteer helping starving children in Africa, and they believe you, it doesn't matter if you actually do it or not, they will think you're a great person. It's almost like you're arguing semantics. "They are not real alphas, they just look and act like ones" uh okay, that's enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 03:38 PM
1

Lose what philantrophic trait? how do you explain women's attraction to narcissists and high status men then? Status/power defines an alpha male, so I don't understand the question. Whenever it is proposed that men provide for children who are potentially not their own, including through taxes; they seem very opposed to the idea and single moms are supposedly the devil. I don't think most men think that far. People are generally opposed to higher taxes because that means they have less money. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 03:24 PM
1

This is what bluepillers actually believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 03:14 PM
2

In a proto-human group, everyone was working(including females themselves) One alpha wasn't "providing" for all the females. Actually, it is reasonable to assume that the alpha was providing the least simply because of his position as a boss. There is no evolutionary reason for providership to be an attractive trait for females.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 03:10 PM
1

Narcissists are dominant and able to attain resources - these traits are obviously desirable in an evolutionary context since such a man can protect his offspring and provide it with resources, giving both mother and child a higher chance of survival. Monogamy is not what humans evolved for.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 03:02 PM
0

Altruism doesn't exist, because altruists feel good about themselves when they help others.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 07:51 AM
1

That's how it already looks like is most relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 07:47 AM
1

Why do I have to love a man's sexuality? Isn't it enough to just love him, faults and all? And here, ladies and gentlemen, is probably the biggest and most important difference between men and women, how they approach relationships, and why bluepill dream is dead. Women, who approach sex from the position of abundance, indeed often overabundance, don't give a fuck about it. It's "just sex" Meanwhile men, at least men who aren't Chads, not only have higher sex drive(or do they) but they also have…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 07:45 AM
1

Feels great. Or so I hear. Thanks to nature putting a lot of nerve endings on your icky parts. How is this against nature?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 05:13 AM
1

Oooh, feisty!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 11:22 AM
2

ITT: It's perfectly fine for men to open up, as long as they do it like they don't give a fuck and are just reporting on a soccer game. In other words, it's okay for men to show their emotions as long as they don't actually get emotional. That's gross, unhealthy, and unfuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 08:08 AM
1

It literally does not go beyond "Is she hot y/n". Trying to build a romantic relationship on anything but sexual attraction is futile. This goes for both men and women, though men have an infinitely easier time with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 08:03 AM
1

RIP
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 08:01 AM
1

Is that another one of TRP's conspiracy theories? Condoms and the pill caused sexual liberation because women could fuck around without getting pregnant. If any men or women shouted slogans along the way, they were completely incidental.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 08:00 AM
1

"Nature" does not equate to what is in the individual's best interest, humans always do things that go against "nature". Like when? Give me an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 07:57 AM
2

Entitled egotism is poetic? Who knew
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 07:55 AM
9

I hate the male sexuality as displayed by most RPillers. *proceeds to describe male sexuality* Which brings us to what I wanted to say ITT: Most women don't even understand male sexuality. They literally cannot comprehend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 07:54 AM
5

Doesn't matter. The moment you socially and legally equate men with women, the women automatically become superior because of our inherent gynocentrism. So even the idea of "total fairness"(which, by the way, was already tried once in the seventies and shut down hard... by feminists) would be - in practice - totally unfair. You can easily see this in action in courts. Men get longer sentences than women for the same crimes - sometimes by as much as 60% - even though legally, men and women have e…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 03:36 PM
3

My point still stands. And fat fucking chance a woman will be able to properly identify why she isn't attracted to her husband anymore and then properly formulate advice on how to fix it. "Baby, you should start lifting, spend less time with me and more with your friends and hobbies, don't listen to everything I say and draw some boundaries, buy yourself that motorbike you wanted, the new kitchen can wait and oh - it would be nice if you did not reply to all my messages immediately"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 08:13 AM
2

The practicality of redpill is entirely dependent on the idea of monogamy, and one that is at least socially enforced. Otherwise, it's exactly as you say: why would women want to deal with 5/10 passing as 7/10 thanks to TRP tricks, when they can just grab a natural 8/10? Or cuck the 7/10 and fuck around? So basically, TRP advice becomes less and less relevant with every passing year.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 07:51 AM
5

Please, if you're going to reply, try to include some actual data. Said the guy who just dumped some Reddit comments as "data". Laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 07:41 AM
1

Suppose it is obvious that someone in need should be helped. A utilitarian will point to the fact that the consequences of doing so will maximize well-being, a deontologist to the fact that, in doing so the agent will be acting in accordance with a moral rule such as “Do unto others as you would be done by” and a virtue ethicist to the fact that helping the person would be charitable or benevolent. And, as usual, only the utilitarian makes some damn sense. This is not the venue for a rigorous de…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 07:38 AM
2

We now use the sexual marketplace theory to solve real marketplace problems!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 07:36 AM
2

Communication is the biggest blue meme. You can't negotiate desire. The moment you fall back on "communication" to solve your relationship problems, you've already lost. Save yourself time and money and just quit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/17 07:34 AM
0

And how many men noticed?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 03:46 PM
1

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2015/06/marriages_divorces2.png&w=1484 And even this is not adjusted for population(absolute values, not per capita)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 08:03 AM
2

Why is this tagged as science? Where is link to the study?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 08:00 AM
1

An interesting woman? Now that would be interesting to see
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 08:00 AM
1

Which is why pure alpha males are rather rare in society. Which is why 80/20.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 08:15 AM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology#Empathy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology#Emotion I'm happy I could challenge your completely unsourced claims, which most of the thread blindly agreed with, with nothing but a fucking wikipedia page.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 08:13 AM
1

tl;dr: nurture > nature nonsense; disregard
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 08:08 AM
2

If you bothered reading his post you'd learn for men it's not only looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 08:04 AM
0

What's that? Your beta male friends can only pick post-wall women to support? Wow, how could that happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 08:03 AM
4

Isn't it obvious that leaving is an option? You also have the option to leave her, does that mean she should join an Internet group that talks about how fickle and undependable men are because they aren't literally trapped in a relationship? No, because she can get laid in 30 minutes flat with Tinder, or get a boyfriend in 3 days with Tinder. She always, always has options. Most men don't. "She's not yours, it's just your turn" == hypergamy. That's why we make an effort to treat our relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 02:33 PM
3

Last time I've seen a (supposed) incel woman on /r/incels, she did not even know what Tinder was. So what can I say? "Women can too be incel, if they're idiots." Will that work for you as a compromise?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 07:46 AM
3

Even with cock, wanting to fuck a transwoman doesn't make you gay. Men are not sexually attracted to vaginas for the most part. Waist to hip ratio, certain facial features, narrow shoulders, small frame, ass, long legs, less body hair, breasts, etc. etc. all the things that physically differentiate men from women and aren't genitalia are more than enough to turn your sex drive on.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 07:34 AM
1

Because it's not physical stuff that primarily generates attraction What?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 07:31 AM
1

So you look at that semi-submissive chubby Beta nerd and your womb tingles and you want to suck his cock?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 07:28 AM
2

something something ukrainian brides
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 03:33 PM
1

It was a practice in Europe. Whether it was widespread or not, you cannot know, because the article doesn't list a single number of women that were executed. But keep trying to prove that... what is it you're trying to prove again? That gynocentrism isn't a thing because women get sentenced for crimes?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 02:52 PM
1

Yeah, if you're going to link to one mass hysteria event, so rare and unusual that it is literally world famous because of it, as "proof", then don't bother "discussing" anymore, it's a waste of my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 02:44 PM
1

Women used to get death sentences for crimes much more than men, and be liable for a wider variety of crimes. Nonsense. Prove it. Even today in places like Saudi Arabia dozens of men are executed for every one woman. Look at Japan, they have the lowest T levels, it's not gynocentric, and men ignore women. LOL wat? Japanese men don't "ignore women", it's the opposite. Just think of a stereotyical japanese male - low rank white collar job, licks his boss' shoes, works 14 hours a day, and despite t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 02:14 PM
1

Feminism didn't do jack shit for women, it's an entirely reactionary movement. Technological progress, which greatly reduced physical requirements for most jobs, is what "made women people". Plus, of course, the whole "Ooops, our citizens are what makes us most of our money so we can't oppress them too much" which led to liberalism and democracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 01:55 PM
1

When did I say that men have biological instinct to trust women? And as a counterpoint, why do women routinely get lower sentences for the same crimes?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 01:51 PM
2

Sure, let's argue biology out of people, that will work
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 01:39 PM
2

Is gender identity that malleable? Why do you assume they are wrong? It seems "obvious" to me that men today are less masculine than those two generations ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 11:29 AM
4

If you admit that gynocentrism is real, a whole fukking lotta things aren't worth discussing anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 11:28 AM
3

Romantic love is temporary insanity; basically your sex drive short-circuiting your brain. Keyword: temporary. Long-term/familial love is just attachment. Humans get attached to things, and the more complicated/irreplaceable a thing is, the more attached they get. Oher humans are on top of that scale. The end.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 06:52 AM
1

Like, how alone? Total segregation of sexes, no men ever meeting women, all pregnancies done with a tube? Yes, that would work
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 05:01 AM
1

Then what do you propose?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 04:13 PM
2

And again, we arrive at the conclusion that Sharia Law is the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 04:08 PM
5

Also completely useless as an actual advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 04:08 PM
1

So you agree with OP 100%?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 04:07 PM
3

It might be a bad represetation of real life BDSM, but it's a good representation of the fantasy of it. Women don't want to come up with limits and rules and safe words. In a way, that ruins the entire idea of BDSM - being helpless and at someone else's mercy. There's no "helpless at someone else's mercy" when you spent ten minutes discussing boundaries and you know he'll stop immediately the moment you say "dickbutt". The fantasy of BDSM is that you don't have to do any of that, that your "comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 08:57 AM
0

realistic sexbots. No such thing. Likely ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 08:50 AM
3

Isn't segregating women a great way to marginalize them politically economically and socially? Can't the same argument be made the other way? Female-only colleges also means male-only colleges. They won't have access to the best professors and graduate programs. They won't have the same network access to jobs. Why do you assume that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 08:47 AM
1

Most likely it goes nowhere. Well yeah, you can't really rely on testimony of a single drunk to jail someone for a decade. If only there was a lesson to be learned here... ...that had something to do with OP...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 08:45 AM
5

Then consider how many sexual assaults happen at home, with someone the victim trusts. This always amused me. Apparently "sexual assaults" happen the most often with someone the victim is able to easily and reliably identify for the police. Amazing that this never seems to raise any eyebrows. If you heard that "most muggings are done by someone the victim knows, often in their own home" how would you react?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 08:39 AM
1

So they don't count? Yes, they don't count. They are a perfect example of humans in their natural state. Don't worry, we are slowly going back to that "natural state" - that is to say, alpha-based polygyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 05:03 AM
3

I'd count cam-whores on twitch as sex workers Then let me ask what's wrong with sex workers
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 03:15 PM
1

Yes, I understand that when she grimces and folds her arms she doesn't like me talking to her
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 02:46 PM
10

I don't know any woman who gets tons of stuff handed to her, besides sex workers, and they are sex workers. Literally all you need to do to get tons of stuff handed to you as a woman is to play videogames with facecam on Twitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 02:45 PM
1

Bushmen of Africa also don't do civilization.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 02:04 PM
2

But how? Why does it matter to you that the car you drive to a mall, the cornflakes you buy in the mall, the fuel you tank on your way back, and the house you go back to are, across a dozen of corporations, all owned by a single person? How does this in any way actually affect your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 01:38 PM
1

What I mean is that patriarchy is not designed. It's not some kind of global social engineering project "to put betas to work" as TRP claims, or giant conspiracy of men against women as feminists claim, or a cabal of rich men against everyone else as communists claim. That is fucking laughable. Patriarchy is simply what you get when you apply base human biology to almost every environment on Earth. It's the natural result of our innate reproductive instincts, defined hundreds of thousands of yea…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 01:36 PM
3

Just like women will wear makeup, heels and push-up bras in absence of men. But in presence of other women. Women compete with women, and men compete with men. This is simply the most effective way to biologically program an organism that relies on sexual selection for reproduction. You are trying to attribute some kind of conscious drive and agency to an innate instinct. You might as well argue that humans that live in cities should not be scared of the dark, "because there is nothing to be sca…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 01:29 PM
1

Capitalism I think served the west fairly well up till recently but the end game of capitalism is 1% of the population controlling 99% of the wealth. So?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 01:23 PM
1

Uh, okay. Just go into the options menu and turn off your sex drive and be a happy girl. Woman. Man. Human.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:28 AM
1

JFC people, read the tags before you comment. This is a question for women. If you are not a woman, do not make a top level response. So what's PPD's stance on people who just feel like a different gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:24 AM
3

The fact that you(and/or the article) treats "patriarchy" as some kind of made-up thing, means there's nothing to discuss here. You and/or the article are completely delusional and/or ignorant about human society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:21 AM
1

Why do married people where the husband is not concerned need a mandatory paternity test? Don't kids sometimes get accidentally swapped at hospitals? Sounds like as good of an excuse as any.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 06:55 AM
2

This is a guide from the NSVRC, one of the nations largest non-profits fighting rape. So, nothing legally enforced?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 06:53 AM
1

If your theory is correct, it's like an emotional version of the classic "I will stop taking care of myself now that we're together because ~I trust you~". But I don't think it's correct, because I've been in heated arguments with many people that I'm pretty sure I wasn't in love with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:50 AM
1

kek For France, Sharia law will be an improvement
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:48 AM
1

Because the wymyn asked for it. Do you need another reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:44 AM
5

It is not feminism pushing this, it is the government because they believe that familial peace is better than knowing a dark truth. Please, why would french government even care? How many families yearly have their "peace disturbed" by paternity tests? 0.07%? This simply had to have been an initiative of some bored feminist searching for another "injustice" to fix. You also seem pretty adamant about the whole "They SAID that it's to protect family peace, so it's to protect family peace!" thing, …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 07:21 PM
3

Refugees?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 07:18 PM
1

If she fights back when you're being an asshole, she loves you. What in the actual fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 07:09 PM
1

But that's just... not fair!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 07:08 PM
4

Is this an ideal situation for women? Obviously? Literally what part of this deal is NOT in woman's favour? Is this morally bad, or should men listen to feminists and accept raising someone else's kid as something they should do "to preserve peace in French families"? Leave morals to the clergy. The law passed and there were no manifestations or barricades on the streets. They didn't even burn any cars! And the french fucking love burning cars. So apparently french men are perfectly fine with th…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 07:03 PM
1

You have an extremely weird idea of salary.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 05:48 PM
1

No? How did you even get that idea?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 04:37 AM
2

What evolutionary purpose do you think big asses serve? Big ass, wide hips, easier birth. Or not. Many animals use their ass to entice males just because. Like Baboons.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:21 PM
2

I don't think points 1,2 and 3 are even necessary. Women in the workforce + hypergamy = game over for most men. White, blue, black collar, it doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 08:44 AM
1

Ass > tits, always. Big breasts serve no evolutionary purpose(milk production is not correlated with breast size) so there is no reason for men to be attracted to them. Except for the fact that they kind of look like an ass(no, I did not make that up) and, in extreme cases of tits, possibly make the waist look more narrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 08:38 AM
3

Most relationships between men and women are friendships. No, most relationships between men and women are acquaintanceships, colleagueships, """friendships"""(one side wants to bang, but the other doesn't) and maybe, maybe, few genuine friendships. Men and women are far too different to naturally become friends. It's just too much fucking work when there are same-sex options available.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 08:35 AM
5

I see a shitty, biased article that mentions one study - in a strawman argument - and then an endless parade of books.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 08:33 AM
0

There was never "a need for a beta provider" for women. The whole "female dual sexual strategy" never made any sense, evolutionarily speaking, and all real life examples of women going with beta males can be explained otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 08:27 AM
5

Classic bluepill anti-intellectualism. OP asks why things are the way they are, and you give him platitudes instead. And "It's just porn" - I can't even fathom how can you consider this some kind of argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 01:33 PM
7

Bluepill women(and men) will believe anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 09:02 AM
1

Are women essentially biologically predisposed to seek abusive relationships? We're talking about the same women who fantasize about being raped, who are overwhelmingly into rough sex and who get off to the idea of being used like a fleshlight by (attractive)strangers. Furthermore "abuse" is not an absolute term, it's all about how you define it. "Some studies" that you mention might just have a shitty definition of abuse, for example it's common to lump physical and emotional abuse together, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 07:25 AM
3

Do women really want a submissive alpha though? Because sounds to me that a guy acting like that ("treat me like a lady, do what he’s told, take out the trash, always be faithful, treat me with respect, and kiss my ass") would quickly find himself single.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 07:21 AM
1

Women prefer men who fuck(ed?) other women. If you want to call it "capable of cheating", so be it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 07:19 AM
3

According to you, men should open themselves up to women. Why? Because "it's okay to get hurt". The actual meaninglessness of that platitude aside, note how there is absolutely nothing to gain for the man in this scenario. They should open up and risk a lot of emotional pain "just because". Because some dead poet said so. This is basically the extent of your argument, which is laughable. Overall your post reminds me a lot of all the feminists who cry that men should "man up an marry, because".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 10:46 AM
3

A some MGTOW said, you can love women, or you can understand them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 10:28 AM
3

I tell you what if he made that in Paint he's a fucking artist, that man
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 10:27 AM
2

Even if they weren't fake, I'm sure they bounced back right away. Women cry easily but then they also just easily shrug and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 10:25 AM
3

One interesting thing that I see a number of men say is that there are a select group of older women who get much better with age, aging like fine wine as one puts it. And I see classic TRP cock carousel -> the wall progression and men who don't measure up and try to excuse it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 10:22 AM
1

Just accept that as straight women, the users in this thread understand what makes an attractive man better than you ever will. One, women lie through their teeth about what they are attracted to anyway so there is no point asking them about it. Two, PPD posters are not a faithful representation of any demographic. Normal people don't post on Reddit, and normal Redditors don't post on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 03:46 PM
1

Uh yeah, I'm /r/incels regular. Don't tell me looks are important. And FWIW, for your first example(the other one is two different people, so meaningless), I think the second(right) pic is better looking, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 03:37 PM
0

Yes, I honestly think "papery wrinkled skin covered in sunspots"(nice extremist fallacy by the way) makes little to negligible difference to women. You are welcome to prove me wrong with anything but anecdotal evidence, though it's likely I will then simply rationalize it as another sign of runaway standards of modern women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 03:22 PM
0

Since when does it matter how "aged" a man's skin looks, in terms of his attractiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 03:10 PM
2

Little less than half of Americans are getting married, that's what I meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 02:50 PM
1

Don't call it a "life partner" if there's almost 50% chance the marriage will fail, and what about more than half of women who never get married to begin with?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 02:32 PM
5

Most attractive girls without red flags AREN'T single after 25. They meet their future husbands between 21-24 and date them exclusively for 2-5 years and then marry around 25-30. Do you have any data to back this up or is this also based on the infinite amounts of different women from all over the country you apparently constantly meet?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 02:10 PM
0

Your skin will look less aged. So?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 02:07 PM
2

You must be side-eyeing a lot od dudes then, damn.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 02:06 PM
1

Is this what PPD has become? We use the equivalent of Facebook comments as proof now?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 01:58 PM
1

Haha!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 08:07 AM
2

Uh, right. Did you know that there are "various evolution systems"? For example, Darwin's Theory of Evolution, and Creationism...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 08:00 AM
2

And similarly gender is a social construct because there are various gender systems to be found all around the world and throughout history. What does that even mean? "Various gender systems"? Can you provide examples of different "gender systems"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 07:41 AM
2

Sounds like you could use some Sharia Law in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 07:39 AM
1

Are you confused TRP with MRA? TRP doesn't need anyone to care. Neither does MGTOW. Only MRA need people to care because they think it will make passing laws easier, or something. But the MRA are crazy anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 11:27 AM
1

Hardly impossible, since everything is downvoted equally. It has almost no effect really, other than dropping your karma score.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 11:25 AM
7

Ever heard of that thing called Industrial Revolution, which made physical strength largely obsolete in workforce? Funny coincidence - some time after, women suddenly started popping out everywhere, demanding jobs...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 11:19 AM
1

Colttaine's "Suffrage and Enfranchisement" video goes into detail, but the real answer is "neither". Group rights first appeared as a result of technological progress(especially industrial revolution), so economical, and women's rights were no different, except they skipped several steps because of human gynocentrism, which can hardly be called empathy. If you think people got rights just because they "fought for them" then you're delusional. Plenty of countries, both through history and still t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 11:15 AM
1

So a disabled male failure still can't any empathy? Yes. How much more misery is he allowed in your view before you would stop shaming him for seeing a prostitute? lol, why are you making this about me? Males are disposable, no one cares about them unless they perform. That's attitude universal to our species, not my personal misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 05:22 AM
2

Women frequently, even on this sub, say oh they do, they always do
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 04:28 AM
1

Because if a man needs to use a sex worker it means they cannot get a non-sex worker woman to fuck him, and therefore is a failure as a male.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 03:55 AM
1

Whe someone else but registered user is trying to have sex with them, they should EXPLODE
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 03:53 AM
1

A lot of data points to it actually decreasing sex crimes, sometimes substantially. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_pornography#Epidemiological_studies
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 03:49 AM
0

It's all about power and status dude. Also, never ever ask PPD-people about "what people think". Literally everyone here is fucking crazy, just by virtue of being here, and in no way representative of general populace anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 03:41 AM
3

Simply because, women are aroused by reactive sensations and feelings they get from guys. What does that even mean? "Reactive sensations"? What? Prove it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 03:37 AM
1

More importantly, why do you blues keep bringng on wolves whenever "alpha" is mentioned, when there are much better examples like chimps or hell, even most primitive human societes that exist today? You know, animals of actual relation to homo sapiens?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 04:01 AM
1

I don't think people bitch about women who settle, it's an argument aimed towards men the women settled with. As in, just because you're married to a girl and you're not a Chad doesn't prove anything, because she just settled on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 05:52 PM
1

Most women are not cheating whores, and they're not perfect angels either. They're people If "women are people" and we know for a fact that most people are weak-willed assholes that just follow from one base instinct to another, then most women will indeed be cheating whores. "Women are people" is just blue blackpedalling. Unfortunately "All Women Are Like That" is a subset of "All People Are Like That" so it changes nothing and actually fits in perfectly with TRP narrative because THEY are the …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 05:13 AM
1

Are you being sarcastic in response to his post or stating a fact? I can't tell
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 05:04 AM
2

Another thread useless for actual discussion, only created to tickle PPD users' ego
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 05:03 AM
4

I don't really break gender stereotypes, unless crying at things is still considered unmanly It is fyi
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 05:00 AM
1

Well, obviously. What's your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 04:58 AM
2

Which would be more offensive to you, if I implied you're crazy because you're a communist or if I implied you're crazy because you're transgender?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:15 AM
5

Adult women playing house
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:13 AM
1

So this is the thread for everyone to jack off their ego?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:13 AM
1

Yes, but indirectly. A woman putting on makeup doesn't do it with deliberate intent to seduce every man that looks at her. She just knows, in the lizard part of her brain, that she should look attractive. And that lizard brain will reward her for looking attractive by making her feel good about herself. And, since she lives in 21st century and makeup is a thing, she uses that thing to make herself look attractive. Just saying "Women wear makeup to seduce men" is technically true but it skips sev…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:54 AM
1

OP, you might want to go to /r/askwomen, sort by top/all time, find the thread about porn, then check the most upvoted comment. Then check the next most upvoted comment, to compare.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 09:58 AM
1

Yes, some exceptions would include: Women who are dominant in bed, lesbians, asexuals and women who just don't like being touched all that much. So, rough estimate, ~10% of female populace?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 09:56 AM
1

Sounds impressive to an introvert like me
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 09:51 AM
6

Don't forget about how you also immediately let yourself go and stop using makeup/wearing nice clothes because "you are comfortable enough to let him see the real you" What a deal, gentlemen, what a deal
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 09:50 AM
1

First of all, great username. Second, I don't think "bad at videogames" can be stretched to "failing at life" no matter how hard you try. Actually, it would imply the opposite, following the logic that people who fail at life spend more time playing videogames, and therefore are better at them. Furthermore, it seems obvious to me that the losing team would blame their members more than the winning team(they should have done a deathmatch) Three, it doesn't ultimately matter. This is classic ad ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 08:55 AM
1

Here's the issue. Being confident and being vulnerable/open aren't mutually exclusive. Is your every post a blatant logical contradiction?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 08:50 AM
1

Yes Yes Yes Depends, leaning No Feminism is an entirely reactionary movement; it never achieved anything Hahaha fat chance, see 1 Wut? Yes No, also way to put two different viewpoints in one question one you twerp What do you think about the tone of these questions? Is it calm or aggressive? Thoughtful or reactionary? If you posted this on /r/askreddit you'd be sent off to /r/iamverysmart in five comments
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 08:49 AM
1

In our gynocentric society? Surely you know the answer to that question. If you want an objective answer, then fuck yeah it is
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 08:43 AM
4

That's only good for detecting if you write sexist posts on the Internet
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 01:47 PM
1

Purse magnet, not pussy magnet.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:21 AM
1

I was always under the impression that the very point of TRP was a successful marriage or, at the very least, LTR. People who "are red pill but not into LTR" are just called MGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:18 AM
1

This board is called "Purple Pill Debate" because purple is what you get from combining red and blue. There is no such thing as "Purple Pill" in the pill-as-relationship-ideology sense. Saying you're a "purple piller" just means you have no idea what the fuck you're doing, you just came here and didn't hear enough of one side to join yet. There is no such thing as a "purple pill relationship"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:16 AM
1

BP= two equal partners who support one another and aren't afraid to be vulnerable. The roles in the relationship are not clearly defined and open to change. Funny how hypergamy alone proves this kind of relationship is unsustainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:14 AM
1

When will /r/incels be unprivated?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:12 AM
2

On both r/MensRights and r/PurplePilldebate there is a lot of users who hold the belief that females have the power to simply accuse a male of sexual and then have his entire life ruined. Sometimes there is significant to an individual males reputation or life from a false accusation, but to say it is a widespread problem and that it affects that many males for it to be a widespread problem is and asinine. So are you saying they can't do that or that they usually don't do that? Because these are…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:11 AM
3

Briffault's Law. If female is the one choosing, the male cannot be choosy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 07:09 AM
1

I'm saying that if biology didn't equip men to care, they won't. There is no "which one between these two women should I pick, one is rich and one is not" for men. Maybe, in order of importance, around the 20th position of traits in a woman. While it might possibly cross someone's mind, saying that rich men will just outright shun poor but attractive women just because they're poor is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 05:19 AM
3

All else equal, in particular, why would they not? They're not biologically programmed to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 05:03 AM
0

How much is too much though? Women want alphas, this was proven countless times. Is expecting your man to be top 20% of the population "too much" though? That's relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 02:41 PM
1

realistic expectations "(Kept failing) gave up"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 02:33 PM
1

You'll never find the perfect person or take perfect relationship. That's what all the betas say
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 06:18 AM
2

Don't forget all the betas/omegas jacking it off to VR porn. That's pretty important
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 06:17 AM
5

Since when do men care about their partner's wealth?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 06:16 AM
3

Trump is using his knowlage of women very well to get exactly what he wants. See also: the whole "Grab them by the pussy" quote that sends Redditors into a blind rage. Hard to get more RP than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 06:15 AM
2

TL;DR: In my opinion, /u/pinkgoldrose is right. Now that's a tl;dr. Since we know that /u/pinkgoldrose is always wrong, we can safely disregard the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 06:12 AM
3

...sure?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:50 AM
1

Why is unleavened bread so important in the Christian world? It's just some weird ass tradition from the desert. rofl, you answered your own question. Because that's what people ate in the desert, as part of the "desert culture" made its way into Christianity, and then stayed as part of the religion even as it moved out of the desert. Simple, logical, cause-effect. I've never ate unleavened bread in my youth as a Christian, by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:33 AM
2

Imagine TRP, but instead of trying to better themselves they just lie down and rot(LDAR). That's the blackpill. Blackpill is love1 , blackpill is life2 , everything else is cope. [1,2]: Results may vary
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:27 AM
1

None, that's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:24 AM
1

Utter nonsense, no matter your actual definition of "imaginary".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:22 AM
1

Just because it's a folly doesn't mean it won't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:18 AM
2

The vast majority of men do not think "women aren't worth it" or "marriage is slavery" or whathaveyou anti-woman/marriage things. Errr...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:18 AM
2

Colttaine is my goddamn hero. All his videos are stellar.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:16 AM
7

what if you don't have this imaginary brain? What if you're born blind? Tough shit. Suck it up. Or prove yourself and do what you want despite society's expectations. Like many "special snowflake" women did throuought history without crying about patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:15 AM
1

Women are unworthy of my love and attention, but this has nothing to do with me. I know what women want, and I also know that I'm almost none of it. They're just unworthy in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:12 AM
1

But do you really believe this double standard is baseless? Nothing in society is baseless.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:09 AM
3

There really isn't any rational rhyme nor reason to many of the social developments throughout history. Seriously? So all this happened why - randomly? For absolutely no reason? This borders on anti-intellectualism, honestly
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:07 AM
4

What does circumcision have to do with oppressing sexuality?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:07 AM
5

We know for sure, men did it because they were able, and because it benefitted men. lol, really? How does monogamy and the whole "no sex before marriage" benefit specifically men?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:06 AM
1

I applaud him for having the balls to publish his manifesto, too bad they're gonna get chopped off
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:05 AM
1

Ahhh, the classic "Who cares about the 95% who will have to suck it up, the 5% need RIGHTS" liberal logic. FYI, it's not about your genitals. It's about your brain and your hormones which regulate your behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/17 07:01 AM
1

Really? You actually imagined grabbing someone by the neck and choking them until their eyes pop out, the whole process? Or stabbing them in the gut then watching as their life slowly pours out of them? Or was that "I hope he fucking dies"? In other words, something completely different?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 08:29 AM
-1

Look I'll just skip the bullshit and say what I gotta say. Just because people "lack autonomy" doesn't mean they will automatically be unhappy, and that they would be more happy if they were more "autonomous". Ask about anyone what time of their life was the best, and they will almost unanimously answer "the childhood". Yeah, you know, that horrible, oppressive childhood where you were at complete mercy of your tyrant parents without a right to object or even a way to escape, as you didn't even …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:59 AM
5

I know exactly how "the debate" will play out so I decided to just skip all the pointless to and fro and get to the main point: because of your broken leftist ideology you associate respect(and happiness in general, and sugar, spice, and everything nice) with enfranchisement. Which is retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:49 AM
0

How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:43 AM
1

VOICECELS
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:35 AM
1

That's like saying that most people want to be rich, but they don't actually want to be rich, because they don't get rich. Yes, both men and women absolutely would want to live out their fantasies. That's why they fantasize about them. The reason they don't is because they're in almost all cases practically unachievable, so they settle for something less. I cannot believe a post that is so obviously nonsensical and illogical and just ass-backwards could get top score.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:32 AM
2

Man's social status doesn't change with marriage, women do not take care of children anymore, men already have a family(and what kind of "get" is that anyways?) and emotional support? LOL if you ask for emotional support in a marrige all you'll get is a divorce or at least a dead bedroom. Everything you said is just absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:27 AM
2

Yeah, the example in the article is idiotic. Women lowering their partner count is them lying up, because lower partner count is more attractive in a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:24 AM
1

What about Saudi Arabia and history?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:22 AM
3

What the fuck are you even talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:21 AM
5

If gynocentrism was reality, women would have been invited to contribute to the proposed GOP health care bills. Look at that, another leftist looking at everything through goggles of their misguided ideology and finding "faults"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:18 AM
2

nice girl wat
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/17 06:16 AM
2

i mean, many women have the ability to do that Sure they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/17 03:05 PM
1

This is about social status, not who is better at DOTA 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/17 10:41 AM
1

This is an amusing question considering that, if I remember correctly, most regulars here have some kind of mental disorder. So maybe they should ask their partners...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/17 06:48 AM
1

But to classify one man as always alpha and one as always beta is childish and illogical. How is it illogical?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/17 06:45 AM
2

I find it amusing how the only link that actually deals with close human relatives - the chimpanzees - explicitly states that alpha males do exist. That's apparently a proof how alpha males don't exist. Because uh, wolves. And The Guardian.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/17 06:44 AM
4

Literal protecting your dumb-ass young daughter for making really bad long-term decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 01:54 PM
11

I think you might secretly be a dude
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 01:52 PM
1

Try mainstream Reddit, they'll tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 07:15 AM
1

Your flair says nu-male so are you gay?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 07:14 AM
2

Well, jokes aside, is there any other place on the Internet where you can talk about the whole relationship dynamic? Normal people don't think about that stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 07:11 AM
2

This sounds like something that could be very easy to Google and get actual research data on. Yep. It was very easy to Google and get actual research data on.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 07:06 AM
1

Cut all contact and wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 07:04 AM
2

70-80% true
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 07:03 AM
2

It's true for chimps, it's true for human hunter-gatherers still living today, it's true for Tinder and it's true for DNA records. That's an awful lot of coincidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 03:28 PM
1

Taller people are actually perceived as natural leaders. Sounds familiar?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 12:41 PM
2

Monogamy became an economical necessity once land/property ownership became a thing. But even in the classic monogamy model the dynamic is still at work, kind of. Since it's the man who owns the house and is the head of the family, thus having serious advantage in social status over the wife, who just shuts up and makes sandwiches. It's only when you introduce "equality" and the woman makes as much, or almost as much, as the man that the whole thing falls apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 10:44 AM
2

The only thing not making logical sense is your post. Why would our "base impulses" stop us from creating tools? Especially since goddamn near all of them were created to SATIATE our base impulses?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 10:31 AM
2

Do explain how competition for limited resources proves we are very good at defying "natural order and instinct" because I think it proves the exact opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 10:05 AM
4

lol, this guy. Our "higher functions" are used for nothing but making excuses most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 09:43 AM
2

Why do so many try to apply evolutionary science to modern dating? ...because why not? Just because iPads exist doesn't in some way negate our innate biology shaped by hundreds of thousands of years of evolution in a drastically different environment
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 09:37 AM
4

Why would sexual freedom make men more selective? This reeks of blank slate bullshit. Men are wired to have low standards and high sex drive. Whether or not Thailand is a sex tourism capital doesn't change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 07:07 AM
1

Just because that's how it happened in the past doesn't mean that it's the only way it can happen. Combine hypergamy with liberal mindset and economic freedom and it's a recipe for polygyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 07:04 AM
4

Polygyny practice is still viewed as uncivilized, not to mention goes against the teachings of the Church, which still holds major impact on popular opinion. Most women would in fact prefer marriage to a so-called "beta" to being the fuck-buddy of a smirking "alpha" with large biceps. Most women do both. First they are happy fuck-buddy of an alpha, then when alphas don't care about them anymore, they "settle down" with a beta. This isn't a conscious or deliberate choice, it's just running out of…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 07:02 AM
1

Just because you don't divorce doesn't mean that you live in a good marriage, or that you are at all happy to begin with. http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/gpr13159.pdf Here's an article that, among many other things, shows that only 13% of couples(not necessarily marriages!) report complete happiness with their partner in a long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:58 AM
1

You live in such a cynical world. You live in such a hopelessly naive world, and one without any evidence as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:49 AM
2

Also, it happens that young men date young women who don't want to have sex. With him. An important distinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:48 AM
1

See, the thing is, it makes little evolutionary sense for looks to matter a lot. If we take the typical group of proto-humans, it was one alpha fucking all the females, with maybe some better betas rarely managing a shag on the side. And how was the alpha male decided? It wasn't because of his looks. He was either the strongest, or most clever, or most brutal, or any combination of these, etc. male around. So it wouldn't make sense for human females to be primarily attracted to looks, because it…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 06:40 AM
3

Then don't have a job. Go live in a forest, hunting squirrels and sewing your clothes from bearskin, in full bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 04:25 PM
2

Were you somehow not informed that your wage will be subject to taxation beforehand? Whether or not you willingly labored for that time is decided by your signature - or lack of it - on the job contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 04:18 PM
2

While incels on the other hand get off on making others feel just as worthless as they themselves are News to me, and I spend fair share of my time in /r/incels. They are a product of their own shitty personality and of their toxic echo chambers. It wasn't their personality that brought them to /r/incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:42 PM
3

Actually if you take the rad fem perspective and that men are the parrallel to the bourgeoisie and women are the proletariat Then you've already lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:37 PM
2

Whoa, wow, okay. You're going to have to walk me through how taxes violate your bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:34 PM
1

Unfortunately not
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 03:07 PM
1

I think it's a problem with the definition of success. I mean, even the current definition of a "happy relationship" is basically "a roommate friend". Like, it doesn't matter if you're actually fucking or attracted to one another, the real defining feature of a happy relationship is if you can watch netflix together on a saturday evening. That is fucking crazy. I think people have been failing relationships for so long now that they redefined failure as a natural, normal state; the "happy relati…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:17 AM
2

I mean, shaving may make women maybe 5% more attractive, so it's hardly a deal breaker, but it's still more attractive. And if you want an evo psych excuse: less hair looks younger, and if there's a single universal criteria for attractiveness of women, it's youthfulness.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:11 AM
1

Because society doesn't believe that. Society as a whole believes in the other half, the true love, that everyone is unique but equally valuable, that "healthy, loving relationship" means dating a friend first and foremost, all that naive, platitude nonsense. You cannot expect "the society" to teach men something it doesn't even believe to be necessary to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:07 AM
3

Most people here have no idea what a "happy relationship" or "satisfactory dating life" is, so good luck with that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:01 AM
1

How often do you have sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 10:01 AM
2

Because when people talk about "nice guys" they're talking about the guys that pretend to be nice to get laid and turn into an asshole when rejected. Which is maybe 5% of all Nice Guys. And it's still not their fault that you outright lied to them about what women want and they get angry when it doesn't work. If you ask me for directions, and I tell you the opposite to where you want to go, wouldn't you be pissed off? Not actual guys who are genuinely nice. And here's the 95% that never gets lai…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 09:59 AM
1

So you're basically making a NAWALT argument because it's all "according to her"? Well the her is still mostly biologically preprogrammed so...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/17 09:58 AM
2

The irony is that a lot of terps are cynical nihilists, who doubt that you can do anything. You're thinking of the blackpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/17 06:22 AM
3

What are they supposed to do, live their entire lives with a full mask? What are they supposed to do, live their entire lives with a shitface?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 06:20 PM
1

Plenty of guys Solid data set would excel
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 06:13 PM
3

No, I don't believe they did something impossible. For example, maybe women settled with someone they were not attracted with, but this has nothing to do with "lowering your standards". The standards remain the same, you're just consciously not meeting them out of desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 08:45 AM
1

More options will just mean more shitty options.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 07:57 AM
3

If someone has trouble finding a partner their standards are too high. This is a tautology. No, this is retarded. Either you are attracted to someone, or you are not. There's no such thing as "lower your standards" that have been biologically pre-determined. It's like telling someone stupid to "get smarter".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 07:55 AM
1

And that is what /u/Sunhappy_DC meant by "poor character"? He was saying you should act like a nazi/racist/misogynist? Remember that these /r/incels experiments are made to debunk normie(bluepill) "advice"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 07:52 AM
1

What do you respect and/or admire about yourself? That almost made me laugh out loud, I probably would if I wasn't at work
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 07:48 AM
7

However, the part that generated a lot of discussion was that the survey included "threatening to end the relationship" and "buying her things" in the category of rape. Is this the real life Is this just fantasy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/17 07:46 AM
3

And of course "respect" is what makes for a happy relationship...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 02:02 PM
3

Seriously? Did you somehow miss this meme your entire life?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 01:25 PM
2

I don't think you're lying. I prefer to rely on Hanlon's Razor instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:47 AM
2

So, anecdotal evidence? Yeah that sure beats all the data we have
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 10:13 AM
6

I'm surrounded by happily married couples in my friend group And how do you know they're happily married? Because of their signaling and facebook messages?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 09:42 AM
7

Why did your boyfriend think my post was inaccurate? Probably because he was taught by feminism how all women are horribly oppressed their entire lives. Everyone knows that as a woman, you wake up every day with horrible stomach cramps, you go to your shitty job(all the good ones hire only men) where you get paid 30% less than your male co-workers even though you're much better than them, and who constantly either sexually assault or mansplain you. And when you go back home you have to clean the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 08:25 AM
3

I think /u/girlwriteswhat put it best: This debacle of a gender war is not just on the minority of women who are feminists--it's on most women who've not just tolerated it, but viewed the social and legal changes the way looters view a race riot. Sure, they might not care about the issues, but they'll happily take advantage of the measures feminists have managed to enact, or to ignore the way those measures unjustly harm men until the moment they feel personally victimized through the men they c…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 08:08 AM
1

Women protect themselves? Since when? I thought the very idea was "victim blaming" and "rape culture".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 07:56 AM
20

I mean, you have that Tinder and OKCupid data which both show women view 80% of men as below average. And that statistic fits in perfectly in the primate/primitive human group polygyny. What else do you need?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 07:53 AM
0

Well, if you want proof you should rely on meta-studies, you can find a single paper that supports almost anything. But it's usually enough for a casual shit-flinging on the Internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 05:03 AM
4

Same difference, still not peer reviewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 03:59 PM
8

An undergrad paper? You can't be serious
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 03:45 PM
17

And here I thought depressed people could hardly muster strength to get out of bed. I swear, the definition of "depression" changes every day. I am beginning to believe it's just an unmbrella term the psychology hacks use for "people feeling bad".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 03:42 PM
0

Well the first argument specifically, "Why would anyone lie?" sounds autistic. Though the fact you genuinely believe 80% of men regularly pick up women at clubs, fuck them next to their buddies or in their buddies' homes, also points towards you having absolutely no common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 11:42 AM
1

Are you legit autistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 11:01 AM
1

I am mostly curious why you keep using that unusual term instead of just saying "identical" or "the same" or other synonyms. I can't shake the feeling it's a bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:48 AM
0

Seriously, my point was that women are not a hive mind in any way. And what does "hive mind" even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:44 AM
2

Funny how we all want to argue about things the definitions of which we don't even agree about.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:32 AM
1

Heh, well, thanks to Halo Effect handsome men would be thought of as clever anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:29 AM
2

Do you know that back in the day there were anti-suffragettes who were women? How many compared to suffragettes? Does that mean it's somehow fair to start generalizing all men? If the majority does it, absolutely. I really don't understand what is so difficult about the idea that if majority of a certain group exhibits a particular behaviour, it's safe to assume a randomly met member of said group will exhibit that behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:21 AM
2

How is it even possible to not know the sex life of the people in your life? Like do you even talk about anything personal with your friends and acquaintances? Because what they will tell you is 100% truth, they will not lie about it and they will definitely not warp the facts through their own subjective understanding(or misunderstanding) of the situation. And as for your examples? Honestly they are so fucking out there that I can't even tell if you're being facetious or not. But even if I take…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:19 AM
2

Sharia law, solving all of feminists' "issues", 700 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:13 AM
3

"Women" didn't call for anything. Feminists did. Women are not a hive mind. They have very diverse opinions. So what you are saying is that most women don't want equality? "Hurr durr feminists" but in the end, women will take those rights and they will (ab)use the fuck out of them. So what does it even matter who here is/was a feminist or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:09 AM
1

But then again this is reddit and the mythical Chad is more like an archetype from teen movies and high school jealousy anyway So what - handsome, tall, clever men don't exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 10:06 AM
5

Well, all those single mothers would probably rush to settle with the first beta they see. Bluepillers would look at all these shitty, sexless marriages out of obligation and scream "Look at all these healthy loving relationships based on communication! TRP is wrong!" Terrible, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 09:51 AM
2

Don't know if you're sarcastic or not. No one else in this thread knows it either. People base the "everyone I know" arguments on nothing but facebook posts and rumours.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 09:45 AM
0

I've dated a lot of guys. Most of them very good looking. Not one has "pumped and dumped" me So you had no one-night-stands, and all the relationships were terminated by you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 09:40 AM
1

Our priorities are typically different, and that's good. [citation needed] We need both perspectives to keep society up and running. [citation needed] Just world fallacy platitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 08:17 AM
3

I don't necessarily disagree, but what you linked doesn't back up your claim. All it says is that cohabitation rose from 3% to 11% and that median age for first marriage went from 25.8 to 28.3.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 08:13 AM
2

So you are saying that, outside of "I can't get laid!" there is no possible reason to dislike women, ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 08:11 AM
1

Most girls have fun with the fun guys and are "serious" with stable guys. Paging /u/ProbablyBelievesIt because there was a metastudy showing no difference in partner preference between short and long term relationships IIRC.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 08:04 AM
0

People actually do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 08:03 AM
1

Sperm count of Middle-eastern and African men just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 08:01 AM
1

I never said there's anything wrong with MGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/17 05:04 AM
5

The mainstream culture still wants companionship. There are far easier places to find companionship. For example, same-sex friends. Companionship for days. Who women want to marry is cultural. All the science disagrees. Men in marriages where the woman earns more are the most happy. All the science disagrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 04:00 PM
1

No, that's why I don't share your position.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 03:28 PM
5

Ah, I was expecting that. The classic "We have no idea how many rapes are unreported, but certainly a lot of them are unreported" fallacy of people with an agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 03:27 PM
5

This is completely ridiculous. It's male projection. Women want companionship. Do they? It's a TRP trope but really - do they? With over 25% of children being raised by a single mother, isn't it time to reevaluate this trope? TRP assumes women "want companionship" based on the idea of monogamous marriage. But humans are not naturally monogamous; they were just pushed into the role by economic necessity. Take away that economic necessity and any idea of "companionship" is gone. How insecure must …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 03:19 PM
2

If "men earn more than women" is your only criteria, no wonder you don't see a problem. Let me paint this vision of future for you: back to polygyny, 20% of top rich males in relationship with the top 80% of the women, while the remaining 80% of men fight over the 20% bottom of the barrel women or - more commonly - just OD on VR porn. According to you that society's just fine for men because "on average they earn more".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 03:13 PM
3

Your post is neive to the point of ignorance and really does not offer any solutions, but this: Why not focus on building up your own identity based on your skills and ideas, independent of where you stand in relation to other people? Hmmm. Sounds a lot like MGTOW. Something tells me you're not going to like that "reevaluation".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 03:07 PM
3

Or that for a long time, the only depiction of sex that was even allowed in their cinema was rape. Wow, did that puritanism backfire. India's rape per capita is some of the lowest in the world. The numbers just look high because there's a shitload of people in India.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 03:05 PM
1

So by "underestimating", what exactly do you mean - that instead of saying "this has minute effect" they're saying "this has no effect"? Oh no.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 02:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter