TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Standard_Rules_Apply Archive

View 0 posts and 1,671 comments by Standard_Rules_Apply on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,671 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes indeed. Jesus was angry that the fig tree was blooming early with leaves yet bore no fruit. His response? To curse the tree so that it never could produce any fruit! Where is the tolerance and love and forgiveness that Jesus is so famous for? A tree. With no fruit. Cursed. Out of anger. Indeed... VERY dangerous. You don't think going on a rampage destroying furniture while kicking people out is dangerous? Heh. Go to a church and start destroying the pews and running off the parishioners... S…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 10:03 PM
3

Jesus was dangerous at least twice: When he cursed the fig tree for not producing. When he went on a rampage in the temple turning over tables and ousting people. Did you forget that? He was also unforgiving when he rejected the women that were late to the party.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 09:33 PM
-1

What stops a man from being strong?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 08:36 PM
2

hands you more tissues
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:15 PM
2

Need more tissues?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:06 PM
1

pat pat pat
/r/MensRights05/05/19 12:11 PM
1

Still waiting 😂
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:38 PM
2

lololol!!! hands you some tissues There there, you'll be ok.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:37 PM
1

lolol! And now the trollie comes out! Several of you lurking about today... ...my ribs hurt from laughing so much!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:09 PM
1

Ooo, I can't wait to see the part where you quote me saying that. Go ahead, I'll be here!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:07 PM
2

No. You're spamming links that I'm not going to click because I'm wise enough to know better 😉 The funny thing is, you can be poor anywhere. Why do you choose to live in a polluted place? Ah. But instead of making a better life for yourself, you demand somebody do it for you. Kinda like the whole, "I have a vagina, I am entitled to a high paying job!" argument of yours. It's ok. You'll learn.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 11:06 PM
1

Nobody is granting any favors here. Your point is moot.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:46 PM
2

Fuel the rage with your pipe dreams 😂
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:43 PM
2

Yeah, you buy into junk science that somehow thinks the lungs of rich people are not affected by air pollution. You really aren't proving your case here. But hey... Rage on!!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:42 PM
1

Cool. Who is doing that?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:19 PM
1

Umm. You want some of this?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:12 PM
2

Oh yes, you are very wrong. Water pollution does not care if you are rich or poor. But hey, I already pegged you for being young and inexperienced. I don't fault you for that. You just have a lot to learn.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 10:01 PM
2

Lolol!! Don't forget that air pollution only affects the poor. Lolol!!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:53 PM
2

ROFLMAO!!! In the case of pollution, it affects everyone’s physiology the same but it affects us differently socially Because, lolol, radiation is concerned with social class!!! Priceless!!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:36 PM
2

Nah, you got yourself. You lost it a while back, now you're tilted to hell and back! lolol!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:19 PM
2

Epic failure. Good job. We'll be laughing about you for a while. Later! lololol!!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:18 PM
2

Lol!!! LOLOLOL!!! It took me a long time to stop laughing. Instead of, ya know, actually learning a trade or employable skill then working your ass off to earn your position... ...just cry about non-existent inequalities and get the government to put you in a job because of your vagina. Lololol!!!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 09:01 PM
2

Exactly. They do. They have the right to do any job. In an Equal Opportunity Employment setting, why are women pushing legislation to force businesses to hire them?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 08:15 PM
2

I give you credit for trying so hard but once again your young age shows... Earlier you were against those practices in cases of pollution. Pollution affects everybody, white and black, male and female - equally. AA does not. I don't want to live anywhere close to a nuclear waste dump. Do you? See how that regulation is good for EVERYONE? Business IS allowed a certain amount of pollution. The waste products and emissions are highly regulated because of the immediate impact on life of every type.…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:50 PM
-1

Yet you suggest an even less productive solution... ... sympathy from random internet strangers. There are people like this everywhere. If you can't help this particular person, would you help one that lives next door?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:22 PM
-2

You could pleasure him.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:14 PM
0

In what ways will your sympathy help this situation? If you are sympathetic to their pain, what are you doing to alleviate it? If you think you shouldn't have to do anything, what good is your sympathy?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:13 PM
3

If capitalism is based on freedom to conduct business as one sees fit... ...and you remove those freedoms... ...you are no longer in a capitalist system. You can play word games and move the goal posts all you want. Capitalism has been explained to you. Do you have an example or a company being forced to hire someone? lol You really don't know anything about this stuff do you? Affirmative Action Law and Legal Definition The underlying motive for affirmative action is the Constitutional principle…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 06:17 PM
3

Shouldn't you fact check independent of the source?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 05:27 PM
3

cap·i·tal·ism an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. (emphasis mine) Free market refers to an economy where the government imposes few or no restrictions and regulations on buyers and sellers. In a free market, participants determine what products are produced, how, when and where they are made, to whom they are offered, and at what price—all based on supply and demand. Notice a pattern? The …
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:57 PM
3

No no, AA did not organically evolve from the fruits of a free market. AA is an imposed regulation limiting the freedom of business' hiring practices.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:30 PM
3

Affirmative action looks at trying to balance This line is completely false. Affirmative action is a government sanctioned strong-arm tactic to force business to hire who the government tells them to hire. You really don't know much about capitalism if you think AA is good for a free market.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:21 PM
1

You must be new around here.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:52 PM
6

The reason your age came up is because you mentioned free market capitalism. Free market capitalism is something they teach in middle school to give children hope that one day they can be anything they want. Then you get older and learn about affirmative action. Affirmative action is completely counter to free market capitalism. You can't say that anybody can do anything if they work hard enough for it... ...then force businesses to hire women that may or may not be qualified. Freedom is not abo…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:40 PM
3

Some things cannot be explained. For example - the taste of salt. Try explaining that. Wisdom gained through age and experience cannot be explained. At your age, you understand a certain level of things. You are unable to understand some things without age and experience. You will understand better when you are older.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:00 PM
3

It is amusing that you will link to a men's rights thread about the atrocities of feminism then ignore the very reason a men's rights movement exists. The evidence you seek is right here at this sub. I'm not going to paste pages of links for you. Many others already have. Did you read any of them?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:48 PM
3

Excellent. And membership in feminism entails discrimination against men. Now we have come full circle.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:34 PM
3

You will understand better when you are older.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:33 PM
7

ROFL!!!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:30 PM
3

There are also posts on Reddit about the earth being flat, vaccinations giving people autism and Michelle Obama being transgender. So correct!! Which is why it is difficult to discern truth from fiction. It's interesting that you want explicit evidence about this person yet you refuse to acknowledge the evidence against the group this person belongs to. If somebody is a member of the KKK, do you also ask for specific evidence that suggests they will be discriminatory against blacks?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:29 PM
1

The evidence is here, at this sub, in post after post. But it requires you to stick around and do your homework. I can lead you to water, I can't make you drink. You have to do that.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:15 PM
1

Thanks but no thanks. Re-read and process.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:07 PM
3

lolol! You must be really young.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:05 PM
5

You're right!! Feminism is a joke!!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:04 PM
3

Your speedy response is amazing but it demonstrates that you didn't comprehend what was said. Re-read and process.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 02:03 PM
2

Feminism is a cult of hate operated by terrorists with an agenda of female supremacy. One method being used to achieve this is wealth redistribution from men to women. With more feminists in positions of power, more of their agenda is being achieved. Spain is quickly becoming a lost cause. Much like Sweden.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 01:59 PM
3

You didn't answer my question. Why not?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 01:42 PM
10

Lol! Feminism is a cult of hate. Feminists do not want equality or they would be fighting to become septic tank pump truck drivers. lol ...truly wants equality... LOL!
/r/MensRights04/05/19 12:48 PM
14

Oh? Why is that an over the top reaction?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 12:35 PM
4

You make a claim and refuse to offer supporting information to back up your claim... ...just like a feminist does. How interesting.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:40 AM
2

If everybody takes rape serious, what is the need of this post? If we all agree that water is wet, why make a post about it?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 12:40 AM
3

Who specifically doesn't take it seriously?
/r/MensRights04/05/19 12:21 AM
0

Did you mean to say that combat veterans do not take surviving rape seriously? Is that why they need to be compared to? You think they don't take it seriously?
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:41 PM
5

Question: What is considered decent human behavior and who decides that?
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:35 PM
0

Heh, this is the new men's lib rights sub must watch materials!!
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:05 PM
1

But you don't really know.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:09 AM
1

Is it possible the daughter discovered these toys from somebody other than her parents?
/r/MensRights02/05/19 09:26 PM
1

Aww, look, you used big words trying to sound all smart and stuff 🤣
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:02 AM
1

Dur hur.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:59 AM
1

The only reason you can react so nonchalantly is because the only burden you have to bear when a child is born is financial. Your body is not affected at all. This isn't accurate at all. You are completely discounting the reality that 18+ years of financial support does in fact take a physical toll. Remember, many many guys are blue collar workers employed in hard labor that is often dangerous. Sure there are some in cushy office jobs, but you have totally forgotten Bob the 20 something year old…
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:50 PM
1

Opinions are not facts. Nor are they common sense. We are surrounded by good and bad people every day. Your actions are your responsibility. If you allow a bad person to influence you to do bad things, you are to blame.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:31 PM
1

Who are they funded by exactly? And what is the incentive in bringing women to a position of higher power than men? Good questions. Looks like you have some homework to do. “He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby becomes a monster. And if thou gaze long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee.” (Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil. Aphorism 146)
/r/MensRights26/04/19 01:36 AM
1

Are you starting to get the idea that if you oppose feminism, you will be systematically destroyed? This is what we face. Feminism is a cult of hate operated by terrorists. They are funded by very deep pockets and they influence legislation at every level now. This is an all out war. If you do not worship the shrine that is feminism, you are the enemy. Male, female, trans, gay, lesbian, they don't care. If you are not 100% with them, you will be treated as a hostile enemy to be dealt with. I've …
/r/MensRights26/04/19 01:16 AM
1

Ready for the next level? Erin Pizzey is another. I did a search here for Cassie Jaye. Within the results I found this. [deleted] • 1y You should really look up what happened to Erin Pizzey if you don't already know. She has interviews discussing being threatened by militant feminists. She's banned from the abuse shelter she started. Jex117 • 1y Her mail still gets screened for explosives... Pause for a moment to consider that.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 01:01 AM
1

Do you believe all those things you mentioned are not currently happening? Try this. Do some serious study of The Red Pill documentary. Watch the film. Consider the messages. Then when you are brave enough... ...research what happened to the creator of the film. Send a PM when you fully understand what you are up against, when you are ready for that kind of retribution.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 12:29 AM
3

Did you mean to say that we should all watch porn equally?
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:41 PM
3

Create a post asking for it. Make it a good faith request. You will receive.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:32 PM
1

If those in power do not share your sentiments, how do you propose to achieve these changes? See, you and I can shout from the roof tops that we demand change, but after that? When the propaganda is being taught at home, in school, in a vast majority of public forums. When your very existence is reduced to nothing more than a servant to the female and this is the culture in which you are born. When the problem grows at a national level across the globe with no foreseeable end. When even the law …
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:31 PM
1

If we take one step forward and 25 steps backward, are we getting anywhere? Can you demonstrate that we're making forward progress?
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:50 PM
2

If you will stop getting your history lessons from feminists and start researching the subject objectively, you will find you've been lied to A LOT about the origins and behavior of feminists from the beginning until now. If you stick around long enough, plenty of links will show up for you to explore.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:48 PM
1

I know female supporters are out there but where are they? Your supposed feminism claims to be full of them. Yet here we are, 2019, things are getting worse and worse for men on a global scale. Your optimism is beautifully hurtful. Unless you can actually create change, giving hope to the hopeless is only going to make the fall that much harder. Lucy to Charlie Brown: "I promise I won't move the football this time. I promise!! Go ahead! Kick it!!" Until you can demonstrate that things are improv…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:39 PM
1

Given that we don't know your age, it will be interesting to hear your thoughts on what you've said today in 50 years.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:28 PM
2

Feminism is a cult of hate operated by terrorists with an agenda of female supremacy. Change my mind.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 10:25 PM
1

If you concede your claim is merely anecdotal, no worries. If you pretend you have some kind of grand wisdom of the ages, without being able to support it with credible evidence... Then you default to just having an opinion. Opinions are fine. I think ham and cheese on wheat is to die for. That's just my opinion though. Opinions are not facts. They are not common sense. If you think a man needs a woman to be a good man, more power to you. That is your opinion. But without evidence, it is not a f…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 09:22 PM
1

I recognize the predicament you've put yourself in. You made a wild claim and somebody asked you to verify it. Asking me for evidence of something completely unrelated does not absolve you of having to present evidence of your claim. This website does a great job of explaining why the sky is blue though. Enjoy! https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/blue-sky/en/ I look forward to the evidence of your claim.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 08:35 PM
1

If you make a broad claim about every person on the planet that has ever existed... ... Yes. Some evidence is in order.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 07:51 PM
1

A man's success absolutely does have a lot to do with who he chooses to spend the majority of his private life with. Do you have any evidence of this?
/r/MensRights25/04/19 02:26 PM
1

The point is that it does not take a good woman to make a good man. There are colloquiums that try to give all the credit to women... "Behind every good man is a better woman." This is false. Religion would have you believe it takes God to be a good man. Feminism would have you believe it takes a woman to make a good man. Funny there is no reciprocation. Why is that?
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:24 PM
2

If you choose your job, doesn't that make you ultimately responsible?
/r/MensRights25/04/19 12:14 AM
1

Put yourself round a good woman and you can raise yourself up without help. You forget that one.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 11:54 PM
1

Ability to recognize humor is a tale tell sign of good fun which requires less stick up one's ass. 😘
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:05 PM
1

You knew we only have ONE SLEEPING BAG!! But you came along anyways, didn't you precious. Strange, we never ran out of lube.... scratches ass in confusion
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:03 PM
1

Ah yes, we all need to believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster!! praise the noodly appendages you heathens!! You have been put here for a reason by the great, all-powerful Flying Spaghetti Monster!! sing the hymns you ungodly savages!!! Were it not for the mercy of the All Mighty Flying Spaghetti Monster, you would cease to exist!!! now put your tithing into the golden spaghetti bowl that it may be used for reasons!! don't ask what are the reasons!!! Pray, pay, and OBEY!!!
/r/MensRights24/04/19 10:00 PM
2

Fuck you! 😋
/r/MensRights24/04/19 09:52 PM
1

posts like this just make life harder.. I wish people would stop... I do wish they'd spend... wait for it before we start trying force shit on other people Priceless.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 09:48 PM
1

Your argument is flawed. You are reducing to the most absurd premise. Since you didn't counter with, "this isn't a war," and you continued to expound on my comparison to war, it is noted that your contention lies not in fighting back but in the details of how. It's interesting to me that you bring up all kinds of ideas on using the wrong weapons and using too much firepower and even go into war crimes. I do agree there are wrong weapons for certain occasions. Don't bring a knife to a gun fight, …
/r/MensRights24/04/19 07:46 PM
1

Actually I did. I asked several questions in rebuttal to your premise. So you aren't confused, I'll reiterate with small words. Your position is that we should not use the same methods as our enemy. Using that logic we should not use guns to fight an enemy that is already using guns. Do you shame the military for using the same equipment as the enemy? If not, why do you shame people for using the same tactics as their enemy (feminists)? Let's see if you can actually debate.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:28 PM
6

Wow. Many people disagree with your premise. And you sound an awful lot like the feminists that are waging war against men. Rather than engage in civil debate, you resort to expletives. If you don't agree with my arguments, try actually countering them.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:55 PM
6

In war, is it considered stooping if you shoot the enemies with similar weapons they are shooting you with? If the forest ranger uses fire to fight fire, are they stooping to the level of the fire? Why are you shaming people for fighting feminists on their own terms?
/r/MensRights23/04/19 02:48 PM
1

You said it was related because it wasn't. Come on now. By your own admission it's not related.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 02:20 PM
3

Oh, it was removed... I wonder why... And here you are putting it back up... Looks like you have an agenda for sure.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:42 AM
3

Heh, you deleted the first post you made about this and turn around and repost it... 🤣😂🤣😂🤣
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:22 AM
2

Ok, I'm laughing with you, not at you. The relationship it has with men’s rights is the fact it has nothing to do with men’s rights This is the most hilarious bullshit I've seen here in a while. "It's related because it's not." You just can't make this stuff up. lolol!
/r/MensRights22/04/19 10:33 PM
1

No, you told me what commenters thought. I asked you specifically. It's ok if you can't. The video does not pertain to men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 10:07 PM
1

Allow me to clarify: Addressed to you, the OP: What specific right of men does this video pertain to?
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:37 PM
2

crickets
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:34 PM
1

What right of men does this video pertain to?
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:31 PM
2

Are they talking about men's issues or trying to define masculinity in their terms?
/r/MensRights22/04/19 08:23 PM
8

This is very difficult to moderate. People will take what you say differently at different times. One day you use 'some word' and it's fine. The next, it's AHHHH WHAT DID YOU SAY TO ME?!?! Nevermind those that intentionally take things the wrong way to stir the pot. It IS reasonable to consider some expressions to be offensive or obviously trying to start drama. But if we don't all agree to it, then we're back to square one. So what's the solution?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 04:23 PM
3

lolol!!
/r/MensRights21/04/19 11:31 AM
1

lol!! Epic fail.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:20 AM
6

You're saying to me that asking for evidence of your claim is foolish. LOL!! Because you are perfectly trustworthy oh random stranger of the Internet. LOL!! You told me so it must automatically be true right? And asking for verification of your claim is insulting to your upstanding integrity? That's exactly why you are so easy to disregard.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 09:59 PM
10

Hmm. You make a claim. I ask for evidence. You complain because I ask. Sounds like a twist on 'believe all women... no proof necessary. You make it easy to disregard your claim. Thanks.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 09:04 PM
1

You haven't said anything to make me think otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 09:01 PM
5

Are you able to link to any of those posts?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 08:48 PM
5

What posts have you made here that have been downvoted to hell?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 08:38 PM
1

Yeah, you want to let women abuse children without fear of jail. I get it.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 07:50 PM
2

Yeah, I don't know how much more of your apologetics I can stomach. You keep claiming all this great stuff about feminism yet men's rights continue to suffer at the hands of feminists. Been like that since the beginning. So keep on chugging the Kool aid, you seem to like it a lot.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 07:49 PM
0

Two counts of battery resulting in a black eye because the child wouldn't stop crying doesn't warrant jail time?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 06:15 PM
1

Most women that speak of "feminism" are usually identifying themselves as equity feminist ROFL!! You crack me up defending the feminist schtick.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:53 PM
1

According to the linked article she was charged with two counts of domestic battery. The infant has a black eye. What more needs to happen to warrant jail time?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:16 PM
-1

Did you already repeat something once that needed repeating again? You still have not affirmed a jail sentence for assaulting an infant. Is that because you would not want to put her in jail? She doesn't like her child enough to bash them... ...you want to take away her problem and leave her to be free. Gynocentrism at its finest.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:40 PM
9

But treating the issue as an actual war will only entrench feminists further into their positions. Two problems with this... 1) You can ignore the existence of a war being waged against you all you like... But it doesn't negate the fact that the war is really happening. And you are their enemy. 2) Feminists are already entrenched and it's getting worse. regardless of how deserved we would be Here you recognize that we deserve to take action yet you campaign against it. Gee, where have I seen thi…
/r/MensRights20/04/19 04:37 PM
11

Us vs them mentality is ridiculous Until 'they' come along with an invasion army and decide 'we' are an obstacle in their path. Perhaps you could march out to the front line with a batch of freshly baked sugar cookies and explain to them war is not a zero sum game.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:58 PM
9

another triggered closes with all caps lol
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:40 PM
0

Ah, so a woman can assault an infant and you don't recommend jail. A sympathizer if there ever was one.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:30 PM
1

Knowing that feminists are the enemy is exactly correct. Cutting through the bullshit and exposing their lies is how to fight back.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:28 PM
2

Feminism is a cult of hate operated by terrorists with an agenda of female supremacy.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:25 PM
1

For real propagandizing.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:22 PM
4

And what punishment do you suggest for the woman?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:41 PM
1

A feminist thinks little boys are the sweetest... LOL! For a second I thought this was a genuine conversation. Then the propaganda started.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:14 PM
5

The part about wallowing in self pity amused me the most. I take it self awareness is not your strong point.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 08:42 PM
4

Only if you disregard our basic concept of innocent until proven guilty. Your position tries to assert guilty no matter what: • You assume all accusations are true • You assume guilt even without evidence of a crime • You assume a not guilty verdict does not actually mean the person is innocent This means that you believe every accusation, with or without evidence. Yes, I saw you said 'most'. But how will you believe a person is truly innocent if there is no evidence of a crime? This is why we p…
/r/MensRights19/04/19 08:00 PM
6

Not entirely true. Herpes spreads through oral sex.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 07:20 PM
3

To add to this, consider that China does not care as much about the materials used in manufacturing. There have been several issues with imported goods from China containing toxic substances. Right off I remember two, reactive metals used in cheap jewelry and contaminated pet food. Many women are incredibly picky about their dildos because of this reason, the materials can cause bad reactions in the wrong places at the worst time. So I'm not sure how this can remotely be a good idea.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 07:19 PM
0

Username checks out heh
/r/MensRights19/04/19 01:07 AM
3

And he's off ladies and gentlemen. How long can he ramble nonsense??? Stay tuned!
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:31 AM
2

Yeah, didn't want to feed the troll so I opted out of your trivial attempt to bait.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:44 PM
2

MmmHmmm.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:15 PM
-1

And reveal everything?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 09:21 PM
0

Why wear clothes at all then?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:45 PM
-2

I wonder if you have seen how revealing the cothing that younger women are wearing today? There are cases where you CAN see everything... How is that acceptable?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:45 PM
0

You'll be ok, really.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:58 AM
3

Step up to what? You came with your hypothesis then shut down any opposing views: If you disagree with me so far... feel free to move on. You aren't looking for debate because you've already decided what you think is factual and undeniable. Anybody that disagrees can move right on. Then you assert your supposed truth by discrediting any opposing views as being based on feelings, anger, or hurt: Anyone reading this can deny it. You can reject what I'm saying based on your feelings, your anger, yo…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:54 AM
0

Yes, precisely. And the last paragraph concludes in the same way trying to shut down any debate before it begins. Just another crackpot trying to brandish his brute tools of manipulation on others.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:11 AM
1

No I’m saying that people may be living in the future of 2019 but the expectations is very stereotypical of the past. How many times have you seen or heard that if someone has to stay home, care for the kids or clean the house, it’s assumed it’s the woman, and if something needs done that’s labor intensive it’s assumed it’s the guy. People aren’t as progressive as they claim to be. Wrong. If you ask a preacher if it's ok to drink, you'll get the obvious answer. If you ask tradcons if it's ok for…
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:30 PM
1

We’re comparing homemaking to working as equal not as being harder than working No no. Homemaking is NOT as hard. It also seems that you’re losing sight of what is being discussed by using kids at work as those kids would be customers not variables that need to be worked around when doing work or scheduling. Heh. Working in the public means you will work around children. Again, a person may not make a person a homemaker but circumstances do You keep confusing circumstances with choice. Why do yo…
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:29 PM
1

Ah. But you are forgetting the very real consequences of false accusations. I say that they should be accountable for that...
/r/MensRights17/04/19 12:45 AM
1

The work involved may not be hard on its own, but it’s not always as simple as... Life is not simple. Why do you expect it to be? and doing what you want when you want. Like any job there are responsibilities that are on a schedule. This is not unique to home making but home making is MUCH more flexible than MANY jobs out there. I mentioned kids, not to complain about them, but as another factor that you would have to work around, they aren’t robots and you do have to work around them. Just like…
/r/MensRights16/04/19 10:33 PM
1

When you go to work... once established it’s pretty routine and doesn’t take much effort This is a moot point. This statement can be said of a home maker as well. You design your day to start at X and and at Y. Once established it doesn't take much effort. At an official job you do not have this luxury very often. In fact, many many jobs have random schedules. One week you might be mornings. The next on nights. Maybe a mix of both. it’s typically more physical than mentally taxing. Absolutely fa…
/r/MensRights16/04/19 02:59 PM
1

It is impractical to learn every skill available. This is why division of labor became a thing. It is infinitely more efficient and productive. While you do X, I'll do Y. You'll get very good at X and I''ll be very good at Y. This is how we came to have the lifestyle we do today with technology, and medicine, and sheesh a million foods to choose from either already prepared or ready for us to take home and make. We can't all learn carpentry and how to fix cars and plumb and weld and cook and sew…
/r/MensRights16/04/19 12:04 AM
1

A few thoughts. In all reality, homemaking is not the horrible task you make it out to be. It's not a constant grinder of work, work, work. You set your own schedule. You set your own pace. You break when you want, take lunch when you want. You go out when you want. Unless you live in some kind of 20 bdr house with 12 bathrooms, typically you have 2-3 bdr with 2 baths. You don't work the entire time. You don't do everything everyday. For example, you don't wash windows everyday. You don't scrub …
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:56 PM
4

Does that mean there is never a black / white situation as it would be 'absolute'?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:13 PM
2

Great! Bring your... friend... here so we can all meet the one true Scotsman!
/r/MensRights15/04/19 02:41 PM
2

I have thought about this question as well. In many ways we can be whoever we want. Yet isn't there a basic format for men in order to be identifiable as a man? Most of us use visual information to identify and navigate things in our environment. If we confuse the subject to FUBAR level, what will happen to basic interaction? Many people have become sensitive to the slightest mistake. Remember the situation with, "It's MA'AM!!" ? What will we become if this is a daily event? If you present as a …
/r/MensRights14/04/19 10:05 PM
1

No. Debate the merits of the topic, not the debators themselves. If I introduce myself as an expert (which I did not) then my credentials and even my emotional portfolio in regard to the subject can be called into question. In a casual debate with no credentials cited, trying to counter an argument by questioning the debator is not a viable rebuttal.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 08:44 PM
2

Such an astute observation!
/r/MensRights14/04/19 04:18 PM
2

I wonder how the historians will record these times.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 12:13 PM
1

Determining if the subject is gendered or not does not change the potential toxicity of the behavior. It merely makes it appropriate for the chart based on that one aspect.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 12:08 PM
1

See, here's where you went you wrong. The entire purpose of my participation in this thread is not to discuss the dynamics of abortion... ...but to explore whether abortion belongs on the chart in OP.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 12:02 PM
1

pat pat pat There, there. Everything is going to be alright.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 11:19 AM
5

See ya.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:05 AM
1

pat pat pat
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:03 AM
6

Feminism is an organization of hate run by terrorists with an agenda of female supremacy. Feminists both male and female are the enemy. Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights14/04/19 02:41 AM
1

Women being in control of their own bodies is a gendered issue? This is not going to work. The actual subject is that abortion is a gendered issue based on only one gender being the actor - the pregnant woman.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 02:19 AM
2

An interesting point of view. One that completely agrees with abortion being a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 01:26 AM
1

Perhaps you have forgotten the flow of our conversation. You initially made this assertion: This pyramid could be much better. Abortion in particular needs to be removed outright. Abortion is clearly disjointed from the rest of this even if there's any toxic femininity involved. To which I replied: What are your thoughts on why abortion should be removed? What reason? Then, curiously, you asked me the same thing. You made a post. Abortion in particular needs to be removed outright. Abortion is c…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:54 PM
0

You did not answer. And that's ok. Take care.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:38 PM
2

...? Previously you agreed that murder is wrong. Now you appear to be having a moment of confusion as you seem to be wanting to discuss other matters. Do you have any other thoughts directly related to the topic at hand (Should abortion be included in a list of toxic female behavior)? If so, let us hear them. If not, I wish you a good day.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:32 PM
2

Except we don't. See the difference? We literally don't allow that? You agree then. Murder is wrong and toxic. Even in war we don't relish in the taking of lives. We call it a necessary evil to make the task easier to perform but we do not take pleasure in killing the enemy. Make no mistake, committing a wrong action for a justified reason... ...is still a wrong action. You think abortions for under age rape victims is toxic. You are fixated on this. I wonder why. Either way, because there is an…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:20 PM
2

If we allow murder for avoidance of responsibility, we would also allow murder of children later in their lives, to avoid responsibility for caring for them. Or even spouses, aged people, any who become too burdensome. As far as I am aware, murder to avoid responsibility is not acceptable. This means that in some cases, murder is wrong. It means murder is toxic at times. If abortion to avoid responsibility is wrong (toxic), and abortion is solely a female behavior, it stands to reason that abort…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:50 PM
1

Thank you for the support. Take care.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:32 PM
2

And in the case of a one night stand by two legal, consenting adults? Where the only reason she wants to abort is to avoid the responsibility of raising a child? Is murder justifiable in that case? Or what of the case where the father wants to keep the child, while the mother does not? Is murder justifiable in that case?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:29 PM
0

You: "Abortion is bad. Women sign abortion papers, so they're guilty of doing a bad thing." This is absolutely false in every sense. I have made no personal statement regarding the right or wrong of abortion. When you attack the person you are debating, with lies about their character or what they have said, you have lost all credibility. Take care.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:20 PM
1

You disagree with reading past publications. I'm ok with that. I will continue to study past and present publications of my enemies to find better tactics of defeating them.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:17 PM
2

A behavior being legal does not make it universally approved of. In fact there is intense backlash to abortion on a daily basis, all over the world. This demonstrates exactly the opposite of your assertion. I thought the discussion was about whether or not an under age rape victim having an abortion was toxic. This is your mistake then. You want to discuss underage rape victims. The origin of this discussion traces back to the question of whether abortion should be included on a chart of toxic f…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:14 PM
1

I stated there is value in studying the publications of your enemy past and present. Do you disagree with that? If so, what is your counter argument?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 08:00 PM
0

You will not offer a counter argument. Thank you for your time.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:58 PM
2

I don't think abortion is murder. This is the only thing of import in your last post. The rest is not relevant to our discussion. The commonly held view is that abortion is murder and is wrong. You challenge that idea. What reasons do you have to support your assertion that abortion is not murder?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:57 PM
2

You said: You're the one distributing it. You're the one discussing it. I am not distributing anything. I am not discussing anything other than the value of staying informed of what your enemy is publishing.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:54 PM
2

We do not agree on that point. I have given my reasons why abortion is gendered. Will you counter them?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:45 PM
1

You lost me. What am I discussing exactly?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:40 PM
2

The crux of this debate is as follows: If murder is wrong and abortion is considered murder, does that mean the act of abortion is toxic female behavior? You can reference the statistical anomalies if you like, but it does not address the question at hand. If murder is wrong and abortion is murder, is abortion a toxic female behavior?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:39 PM
2

A great question. One that is at the very core of this debate. Should abortion be included in a chart about toxic female behavior? My question seeks to answer this. If abortion is not considered wrong then no, it is not toxic behavior. Many, many people believe murder is wrong. Likewise, ending the life of a developing child is considered murder by many, many people. So far I have yet to hear any convincing arguments that clearly demonstrate ending a life prematurely is not murder. Do you have a…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:36 PM
3

All information has value. Knowing history allows us to see where we've been, what has changed, what we used to do, what do we not do anymore. Knowing the enemy is always of value. We know the enemy by reading their materials. Especially if the material is still being distributed and discussed.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:31 PM
2

Therefore, given that the woman ultimately makes the decision to abort, it is exactly a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:27 PM
2

I await your actual argument, not your explanation of your thoughts about me.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:26 PM
3

Rephrase your argument to one without reference to me. Make your point be about the subject, not about how I think or believe. Then I will offer a counter argument. In this way we can debate the topic not the people in the debate. Try that.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:24 PM
-3

Ah, but it is merely a question. In the end, who signs the medical consent form to abort said fetus? hint: it's not a man
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:09 PM
6

Not everybody employs the same strategy. But, for example, if I am in business and my competition is getting ahead, I'm going to study and research all I can find them.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:06 PM
1

The discussion is about a specific behavior - murder via abortion. In particular if said behavior should be categorized as toxic female behavior. You can bring up whatever emotional response you like. Likewise I can refuse to debate them on their lack of relevance. Are you able to make a counter argument that credibly refutes the assertion that abortion is toxic female behavior?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 07:00 PM
2

My position is one that questions the toxicity of murder (abortion). Your position devolved into a slander of my personality. If you truly want to argue the behavior in question you will make no personal remarks about the people you debate. Can you do that?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 06:56 PM
2

Ad hominem also does not work. Any actual argument of merit, or just more of this?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 06:44 PM
17

why on earth would i read that trash, why would you want me or anyone to read it? Tactically speaking, it is important to know your enemy. Reading their material is one way to find out what they are thinking and promoting.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 06:09 PM
-4

Appeals to emotion will not work. Any other thoughts?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 06:03 PM
-4

I respect the depth and vigor of these conversations. In the end, it is the woman who must act to abort. This makes it gendered in that regard. And if ending life prematurely is wrong...
/r/MensRights13/04/19 05:49 PM
-7

If abortion is the act of ending life prematurely... ...and doing such is wrong, even toxic... Does that make abortion a toxic behavior?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 05:47 PM
-4

What are your thoughts on why abortion should be removed? What reason?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 05:04 PM
3

Thank you for the humble reply. There is a lot dialog about this subject that wants to end with the man sucking it up and raising kids that aren't his. All while defending the woman for giving up a child with reasoning such as... ...her body her choice... ...his body...STFU!! ...an unwanted child will have a horrible time growing up... Having no father is really really bad. Having a father figure that does the job but doesn't really care about you... ...is only nominally better. It's like dying …
/r/MensRights13/04/19 03:40 PM
8

Another possible way to look at it. Many people develop familial bonds at work. Over three years a lot of bonding can take place. When it's time to move on, when you find a better job, do you refuse to go because of these bonds you've made? And it may not be just one bond. It could be many you are leaving behind. Does that mean you won't miss them? Of course not. But do you stay behind at this job because of these bonds? Let's say one of your old responsibilities was to refill supplies before le…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:20 PM
3

Curious, what rights do women in the US not have that men do, for which your feminists need to fight for?
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:38 PM
1

A sage question, one of life's most difficult to wrestle. Do let me know if you make headway on this.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:31 PM
4

Maybe they're out of doobies and feeling unhappy, heh.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 07:28 PM
1

Now you have devolved into an angry position because I won't banter with you. I've stated my position, given avenues to reach the desired results with actual processes. You, on the other hand, have merely swung your hammer of rejection, refusing to try. This part is sad to me: I would be if there was reason to believe that it can be done at all. Many human endeavors have succeeded without so much as a proof of concept or viability. But you are of the mind to want security before you invest. Whic…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 09:30 PM
3

I agree using the same reference over and over can be a bit tiring, however... ...if it serves the purpose...
/r/MensRights11/04/19 09:20 PM
3

Me thinks somebody does not like historical comparison.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 08:48 PM
1

Yeah, it's going to take a lot of work. It doesn't sound like you're interested in all that. shrug Given that your stance and mine are polar opposites, there really is nothing more to say. I'll continue to work and develop success for myself and those around me. You keep doing you, I guess.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 08:11 PM
2

pat pat pat
/r/MensRights11/04/19 08:04 PM
1

No no no, you already had your chance... Back o' line you go!!
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:05 PM
1

Swing and a MISS! Thanks for playing!
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:04 PM
1

Careful now, I'm not suggesting anything. I'm merely asking questions. If you clamour on about how people should not exist, sooner or later somebody will ask why you still exist.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 09:16 AM
2

If your existence is a problem in your mind... ...why do you continue existing?
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:41 AM
1

Nice try. It didn't work. Easy solution - stop lying. PRESTO!!
/r/MensRights10/04/19 11:59 PM
4

Actually... Sexual Harassment Training Class: Dealing With Sexual Harassment Over the Phone Sexual harassment over the phone has long been the focus point of jokes relating to the so-called "heavy breather". The reality of it though is no joke at all for the victim or victims. Often times, this awful behavior is far more serious than just "heavy breathing" down the line. There was once a young couple, who for reasons that will become more apparent later, will remain anonymous. They were soon to …
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:36 PM
3

Ah feminist antilopes, back with more of your nonsense statistics? When a child nears a hot stove we warn them to stay away. Why? Because it's dangerous!!! Yet here you are claiming 0.0% danger from a very real source of extreme danger. Gee, I wonder why we don't approve of this behavior? No feminist antilopes, you are wrong again. Stop spreading your lies. Real danger warrants real warnings loud and clear! Many women are a source of real danger. If you don't know which mushrooms will kill you, …
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:28 PM
1

This: You can teach them all you like but as long as the incentive isn't there plus this: Tell men to stop trying to please women so much Will acheive the desired results. Effort over time = success. If we stop forbidding the natural, beautiful aspect of our existence - sex - if you stop making it taboo (looking at you tradcons) and start teaching each element of the equation the best practices, we will get better results. When young people come into puberty we must teach them the power and resp…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 09:30 PM
1

Not unless you teach girls to be more self sufficient and less vulnerable. Less strength does not mean less able. Consider the position of manager. You have a team of people each with varying skill sets and limitations. You don't put a frail old woman into a physically demanding role. But she still has purpose and can work toward the goal with as much meaning as the bulky brute. Matching people to their position is key. Likewise, men and women are different and can cooperate very effectively und…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 08:06 PM
1

On the matter of tolerance, it caught my attention because you advocate for feminism then complain about a post that demeans feminism. The picture is clear - you support feminism. You are the outlier here, trying to censor the content being posted so that it aligns with your feminist agenda. Feminism is a cult of hate run by terrorists with an agenda of female supremacy. Many of us are aware of the dangers of the propoganda you peddle. You have no moral authority here. Your attempts to moderate …
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:40 PM
1

On principle I agree that many posts don't qualify as a men's rights issue. However, that is not the point I'm making. Complaining about the lack of productivity with a post that itself, lacks productivity, is the point I'm raising. You can complain until the cows come home, the post will stay up. Ergo, your complaints are useless - unproductive. A curious thought... You strongly advocate for tolerance of the feminist movement yet you are intolerant of posts here you find inappropriate. Hmmm.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 09:22 AM
2

Calling out posts is one thing, claiming to take the high ground by doing the same thing as what you are calling out (lack of productivity) is another. Complaining about posts for the sake of it is not productive.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 11:44 PM
1

Semiotics you say? How interesting. I will look into that. I hope you are well.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 11:35 PM
3

Why can't this subreddit focus on something more productive? Like complaining about other posts? Cause that's wayyy productive!
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:25 PM
1

Good reply. I'm not convinced that the nature of man is to sacrifice for woman. I have witnessed the indoctrination that young boys receive. They are taught to cater to her whims at every opportunity. Now that many societies around the world are experiencing push back to the princess, we have major upheaval. If we taught our children equally the value of every life, not the current traditional model of male work horse - female shopping queen, life would be different.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:20 PM
1

It's difficult under the best of circumstances. The risks are so great that to suggest marriage is a good deal is not reasonable. Kinda like suggesting particular investments. Some work out, many do not.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:15 PM
1

If identity politics cause so many issues, why promote it?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:01 PM
1

An interesting take. Thank you for that. The downvoting I got makes me think some people do not approve of even asking the question. Can't please em all.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:00 PM
1

By the downvoting I got it seems some people think we should not ask the women such questions. Curious their reaction. Could be a brigade I wonder.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 09:57 PM
2

Why are you against sex work?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:23 PM
-37

Genuinely curious... Why do you mention being a woman? Does it matter to the content of your post? Is it more meaningful somehow if a woman says she is ashamed of this behavior versus a man saying it?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:19 PM
1

MRAs are contrarian to the most primitive human instincts. Will you elaborate on this for us?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:13 PM
1

You didn't address the very real problem men face in the dating scene. My guess... you don't have an answer. You recognize the problems today, want to cling to hope that, "everything will be ok" so you give these insincere platitudes. Not trying to bust your balls. The struggle is real. It is dangerous. And there is no solution in sight.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:26 AM
1

Perhaps in a time gone by things were different. You could hook up without fear of accusation the next day. Today's dating climate does not offer much positive. You take GIGANTIC risk for what reward? MAYBE the possibility of working your ass off to make a relationship work that might go bust in X years and you'll left with what to show for it? Oooo, where do I sign up for such a great deal??? At any time she might think there's better to be had and you get the shaft. Where is the hope in that? …
/r/MensRights09/04/19 12:53 AM
1

If marriage is so wonderful and great women are in such abundance... ...why do sooo many marriages fail?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 12:27 AM
6

Do you support female genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 11:00 PM
2

No. The question directly asks what the risks are. What are the risks (not the rewards) of marriage? See, you are trying to convince us that marriage is worth the risk. Yet countless divorces happen on a daily basis. In those cases the reward did not pan out. Your singular success is not enough to overcome the very real, very awful consequences of a failed marriage. What arguments can you make in favor of marriage in the face of divorce rape?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 09:50 PM
1

You didn't actually answer the question. Your answer reflects the rewards you've gained from marriage. What are the risks?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 08:53 PM
1

Did you get a chance to answer this question? If marriage represents a horrendous risk, then there must be something amazing to offset that risk, right? What is that?
/r/MensRights08/04/19 08:06 PM
1

Ah yes, the one true feminist has come to spread the "real" information about female supremacy. Let's start with this question: In the US, what rights do men have that women do not?
/r/MensRights07/04/19 09:41 PM
4

lolol!
/r/MensRights07/04/19 08:57 PM
4

Heh, you're angry because people won't buy what you're selling. You can't convince me so you resort to insults. Typical feminist.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 08:07 PM
9

You can't argue anymore because you have no valid arguments to make.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 04:28 PM
14

You support mutilating infants?
/r/MensRights07/04/19 02:35 PM
0

Aw, look, you have no valid argument so you resort to ad homs. What a lovely feminist you are!
/r/MensRights05/04/19 03:41 AM
0

Oh nice. Leave the violent people free to roam and commit more violence. You aren't making a winning case here. Perhaps you should stop now.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 03:26 AM
1

Actually you very specifically did not. You avoided any kind of black or white answer. And you clearly spoke against prison time for a woman that committed a assault. And when I called you out on it, you got all triggered. lol!
/r/MensRights05/04/19 02:58 AM
0

I'll take that as a yes. So the law is very black and white. Sad part is, with your flawed logic and grey thinking, you are making it harder to protect men via the legal system. But that's what you want; I don't want to live in your gynocentric world.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:38 AM
1

Are you defending 85% of female abusers?
/r/MensRights04/04/19 11:47 PM
7

This article is written horribly. It starts off without direction and goes straight into rant mode. Like a rebel without a cause. Whether you’re carrying tiki torches or saying “we just can’t find qualified women or people of color,” we see you. And we will replace you. What does this passage even mean? If you have said something racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic in a professional setting — whether being at work, an industry event or listserv — but don’t see it as a big deal…we see you. And…
/r/MensRights03/04/19 09:46 PM
23

And they clapped for the responses. Very disheartening.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 09:14 PM
1

Anecdotal evidence is not admissible.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 02:37 PM
2

That's fine. We call that anecdotal speculation. If you find some credible science on the matter, let me know.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 10:10 AM
1

lololol!!!
/r/MensRights03/04/19 01:51 AM
-1

Heh, all the education in the world is not going to stop horny kids from having sex. I know this. You know this. But you go ahead and think what you want and pretend you can change reality.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 01:51 AM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights03/04/19 01:49 AM
-2

Education does not stop horniness.
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:30 AM
3

With your incredible loyalty to Gillette and repeated attempts to redeem the brand name... Me thinks you must be on the payroll. Occam's Razor.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 11:16 PM
1

It's ok that you disagree. The point still stands. If you work for and contribute your time and talents to a company that promotes their products with offensive advertising, you are complicit. Imagine your argument like this: A German employee works for a company that supplies the ammunition for the Nazi war machine. What should they do? Just up and quit because some asshole at the top wants to exterminate an entire race? ... Yes. If you disagree with your company's message or intentions or what…
/r/MensRights02/04/19 09:11 PM
6

Is there a "one size fits all" way for every person to respond to every situation that offends them, even if not everybody is offended?
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:20 PM
5

If a company advertises in such a way that you are offended, how do you respond?
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:06 PM
5

Do you support the Gillette advertisement in question?
/r/MensRights02/04/19 07:55 PM
6

If you continue to work for a company that slanders its customers, you are complicit.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 07:54 PM
10

lol!!
/r/MensRights02/04/19 12:00 AM
0

An interesting reply. Wrong in your assumption about my reasons but interesting none the less. Anything else to offer?
/r/MensRights01/04/19 09:56 PM
1

Heh, people also claim to see a face in the moon. Does that mean it was put there by aliens??? You can find anything you want if you look hard enough. Humans are really good at that. Bring some actual science on the subject and we'll talk some more.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 12:19 PM
0

Nobody is attacking you. You are not a victim.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 11:42 PM
0

This isn't a gotcha moment. It's a conversation. What are you trying to clear yourself of? What can I possibly prove? That you aren't what you say you are? Reminder: You can stop at any time.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 11:34 PM
1

I personally did not examine your history. I asked a question about why you found it in poor taste when the general population is fine with the act. The subject of your prior post was next in question. But now you seem agitated at being questioned. If speaking with me is a waste of your time, why are you still replying?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 11:22 PM
3

Challenging questions are not necessarily an indicator of dislike or opposition. Reading posts and asking questions are a big reason we come here. Your OP is a blanket apology for the wrongs committed by women at large. Did you think not even one person would be a teensy bit skeptical? In my years of life I have never met a woman that approved of joking about raping women. Oddly however, many women I currently know find great humor in the rape of men. The problem lies in the double standard. I a…
/r/MensRights31/03/19 11:08 PM
2

...it's okay to see my posts/comments But this response of yours... Also, thanks for checking out my profile. Hope you had a wonderful time. ...makes it seem like it's not ok to do just that. As for the humor, if it's ok to joke about something but not actually do it, does that mean it's ok to joke about raping women? As long as we don't actually rape women?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 10:31 PM
5

I'm curious. If a woman can dreg up a passing comment made in jest from 20 some years ago and use it to ruin a man's career.... ...with great public support mind you... ....why is it not ok when a man returns the favor upon a woman?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 09:59 PM
1

No. Not going to click that link. Got any credible sources?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 09:36 PM
1

Actually I'm referring to the "when" of the situation, not the severity.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 11:06 AM
1

This is a good example of what I mean. Originally you said "nature" or DNA produces dominant human males. Now you say: every male probably would be dominant if you raised them correctly This is the "nurture" argument which is the opposite of "nature". I understand you believe that men today are not very manly. I tend to agree that modern nurturing has had a huge impact on this. DNA does not, however. Physical strength does not automatically make you dominant. That kind of thinking leads to "migh…
/r/MensRights31/03/19 03:04 AM
1

Males are not always dominant though. In fact, a lot of males are submissive. Your hypothesis is unsupported. You seem to think every male human is dominant. That is completely not true. That is the point. I'm not saying one is better than the other. I'm saying your ideas are incorrect.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:48 AM
1

They did survive. They are alive and well in the world.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:20 AM
1

There have been been sub males since the beginning.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:10 AM
1

There are many, many submissive human males.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 02:03 AM
1

Then there are examples in the animal kingdom that defy your lived experience of male domination. Weird huh. Anyways, take care.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 01:56 AM
0

Oh God stop!!! lololololol You're killing me smalls!!!
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:54 AM
1

Ah bummer. I thought maybe you actually had legitimate information, not just anecdotal speculation. But if you do find a credible source for DNA encoded gender roles, hook me up!
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:53 AM
1

That's some straight up gangsta 8th grade sheeat!! You go boiii! What else ya got?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:47 AM
0

You just can't catch a break!! lol If the world thinks you're a jerk, you just might be...
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:42 AM
1

Where is the hard code in my DNA that tells me what I'm supposed to do? Which exact genes are they?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:40 AM
1

Oh. You mean nobody actually assigned responsibility based on gender. So in essence you just decided what is good for you to do in your life. What happens when your prescribed roles don't work for some people?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:31 AM
1

And now you go into blathering baffoon mode foaming at the mouth with YOUR MIGHTY CAPITAL LETTERZ!!! RAAAAAAA!!! roflmao!!!
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:26 AM
-1

In the beginning, who assigned the gender roles?
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:21 AM
1

Yes, I hear you whining about how you feel insulted while you continue trying to insult me... Wait... Isn't that the hypocrisy you are crying about? The difference here is I'm not complaining about your insults. Again, maybe you should find some nice guy to cuddle with. You definitely seem lonely.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:10 AM
0

See what I mean? I call you out for your bullshit and you play the victim. lol smh
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:49 PM
0

Nah, that's your insecurities in action. I didn't attack your masculinity. I observed how you perceive your masculinity. You want so badly to abuse others then play the victim when they don't put up with your bullshit. Maybe you should go find some dudes to grope, sounds like you need some contact therapy.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:36 PM
-2

Ah, I see. Your masculinity is a joke to you. Fair enough. You and cuddle boy should get along well.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:21 PM
-3

Ok. I'm laughing at your idiotic response. Does that count? lol!
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:11 PM
-6

lol! You went directly for the masculinity put down to bolster your argument. No supporting information, no give it a try see if it works for you. No no no. You go straight to put downs. And all that did was reveal an ugly side of your personality.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 10:27 PM
1

Are you encouraging us to hug a bunch of balding, middle-aged men? 🤨
/r/MensRights30/03/19 10:19 PM
12

Your proposal lacks the aspect of accountability. Feminists work to achieve female supremacy. Do you think we should let that happen? This wonderful zhe group you kids want to create does not solve the growing hate toward men. Correct the problems we currently have. Stop ignoring them.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 10:08 PM
0

And the feminist subversives.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 08:54 PM
0

It also has nothing to do with men's rights, yet here it is. And they say this sub isn't degenerating. Heh.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 08:46 PM
2

Perhaps some European history will edify your misguided thoughts on when the penal system became a dystopian, degenerate...
/r/MensRights30/03/19 08:44 PM
1

You: What is your point, there are also stories of people not getting murdered, does that make murder nonexistent and okay? Did I say anything about murder? Did I infer anything about murder? Did I say that because there are good stories of fathers the bad stories are null and void? Did I say or infer that somehow? Here is exactly what I said: And then there are stories of fathers with their children that are never bothered in any way. A positive statement about fathers existing peacefully with …
/r/MensRights22/03/19 08:20 PM
0

You accused me of saying something I did not say. I pointed this out to you. Now you want to bicker about nothing. Yeah, definitely a troll.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 06:07 PM
-1

Yeah, if that's all you can muster as a response... ...you are definitely a troll.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 05:09 PM
-1

I don't recall writing anything of the sort. Are you triggered by something?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:51 PM
1

Heh, did you just call me Jesus? You are so adorable!!
/r/MensRights21/03/19 10:39 PM
1

And the amused! lol!!
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:06 PM
1

All I can do is laugh. And laugh.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 07:47 PM
-7

And then there are stories of fathers with their children that are never bothered in any way.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 07:29 PM
-1

Need a hug but no one has offered you one? Ooo baby, are you offering quality physical contact at crack whore prices??? I would rather advocate...than have a circlejerk. You call what you're doing... advocacy? ROFL!!! You're just another white knight without a cause.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 12:26 PM
1

No no no. It's darrrrling. You simply muuust emphasize. Now then darrrrling. I do believe I've struck a nerve. You are excessively bothered by being seen as, shall we say, less forrrtunate. Tsk tsk. Instead of staying on topic, your feeble mind drones on about your inferiority complex. Sad really. Oh well. The world does has need of ditch diggers.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 12:21 PM
0

If you insert yourself as a proxy for the original person, don't come crying when you are treated as the original person.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 04:10 AM
1

I get that you don't understand. You were downvoted. Your feelings are hurt. Now you want to come after me because your post was disliked. You want to be able to speak without being downvoted. You want to censor how people can use a built in function... ...in the name of freedom. And you can't grasp the hypocrisy of your position because your ego is too bruised right now. One day you might catch on though.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 03:55 AM
3

All is forgiven.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:45 AM
2

Yes, only the exterior of the penis should be cleaned until the foreskin naturally separates from the glans...several years after birth. Do not push the foreskin back until it separates on its own. Then you begin to clean under the foreskin.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:44 AM
-1

I find it intriguing that your argument against censorship is to censor the behavior of others. Perhaps you should rethink that one.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 02:41 AM
1

Heh, your source is a link to pornography. Did you intentionally want to discredit yourself or do these kinds of things just happen?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:50 AM
5

Very good. Does it mention anything about cleaning under the foreskin?
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:48 AM
-2

Oh I see. Your feelings are intertwined in your question and when people downvote your question you take it personally. For the record, I didn't downvote you. Also, while I recognize you don't appreciate the downvote being used as a way to signal disagreement, the fact remains, it is how many people use the downvote.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:47 AM
3

So you didn't actually read it. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:44 AM
1

More community college vocab and angsty rhetoric... ...yet still no answer. Wait for it... lol
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:43 AM
3

What did you read in the link?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 11:08 PM
12

There is no definite health risk. Stop spreading lies. You don't clean under the foreskin for several years, maybe longer. Here, read this: https://www.webmd.com/parenting/baby/your-newborn-boys-genitals-care-of-penis
/r/MensRights20/03/19 10:57 PM
3

but that wouldnt explain why secular people in mass still prefer circumcisions in America Can you source this?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 10:52 PM
5

Downvoting is a way to show disagreement with a post. Do you take issue with being disagreed with?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 10:51 PM
0

lol How's that for a one liner response? lol Again. For all your community college vocabulary and sophmoric insults, your entire foundation hinges on assumptions. And here I thought you actually could answer the question without your narcissism emerging. Once again, I overestimated you.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 10:31 PM
0

Are you unable to answer the question?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 12:15 PM
-1

How does it dismiss?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 12:13 PM
1

Where is the racism?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:00 AM
-3

Where is the racism?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:58 AM
4

Yes. It has gotten really bad here.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 12:42 AM
5

Translation: It's MA'AM!!!
/r/MensRights10/03/19 06:16 PM
1

Maybe you should pray to Brodin for some whey more interesting personality traits! lolol!
/r/MensRights10/03/19 06:02 PM
3

She's quoting a recent post. ROFL!!
/r/MensRights10/03/19 06:01 PM
5

Translation: I get none and I hate the rest of you for getting some. Lolol
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:42 PM
4

Perhaps you should search for the other posts of this exact thing.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 04:16 PM
5

Who forced anything? The BSA choose to open enrollment to girls.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 03:54 PM
2

You aren't as wrong as you might think. Corporate sabotage is a very real thing.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 03:40 PM
1

Yes!! Exactly!!! That's precisely what I'm saying!! If we're going to give half the class free [whatever] then we must give the other half something of equal value or we are guilty of discrimination. I am very happy that you understand!!
/r/MensRights10/03/19 03:36 PM
1

Did you actually accept you were wrong?? Oh my. You've turned over a new leaf feminist antilopes!
/r/MensRights10/03/19 02:14 AM
1

q
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:38 PM
2

lol!
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:00 PM
3

Question: Why are you discussing women's rights issues at a men's rights forum?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:00 PM
2

Yes!
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:45 PM
2

Yup. We agree! 🤗
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:28 PM
1

You can assume and opine until the cows come home. Your assumptions and opinions do not change the fact that the image in OP is not disparaging women. You want to take offense when there is none. Perhaps you should ask yourself why you are so bothered by men celebrating the accomplishments of men. You might find you are biased against men and do not want them to be confident in themselves or to take pride in their work. Healthy self esteem is not just for women. Men can be proud of what they and…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:27 PM
1

Very good. If you give group A something for free but you do not give any to group B... ...can it be said that you are discriminating against group B? If you give group A free pizza and you intentionally do not give group B any pizza... ...is that the definition of discrimination?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:19 PM
1

I hope in a few years you can read this back and feel ashamed at how immature you are. Your attempt to shame me has failed. I hope that this has brought you some happiness but I don’t want to argue. I am happy that you don't want to argue. Just try and be realistic, men’s rights will... This is your opinion. You are very entitled to your opinion. I am happy you have an opinion. Your opinions are not facts. is hardly going to win people over. It's fine that your agenda is to win people over. You …
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:15 PM
2

I’m a man, I just don’t think that makes me better than someone else Excellent. You are no better than anybody else. I don’t feel the need to be proud of someone else’s achievements just because they had a penis. You are welcome to feel whatever you want. Nobody is stopping you. Do you seriously think that it is beneficial to men’s rights to gloat about how great men are? Some women are great. Some men are great. How do we know this? Because we remembered them, the person, the man or woman they …
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:48 PM
2

I understand clearly. The words you quoted do not exist in the image. That is an indisputable fact.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:36 PM
6

Ah. The "whataboutism" game. No thanks. I am not an athlete in the Oppression Olympics. You want to be a victim because an image talks about the many many accomplishments of men. Your fragile sensibilities are showing. This isn't about you. No victim here.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:25 PM
9

Your quote does not exist in this image. You cannot make it appear, it does not exist. You are being dishonest about what has been presented.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:21 PM
2

No. This post is literally saying that men have accomplished too much to celebrate all of it in one day. But you want to play oppression Olympics and read something that isn't there.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:20 PM
7

I looked. I looked again. What you quote is not there.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:01 PM
1

Sure you did. You pondered it then made a reply. Get outta here lol.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:01 PM
7

Where does it say that?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:43 PM
6

Yes. Yes I do. This post makes no comment about women.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:40 PM
2

The post says nothing about women. Why are you reading something that isn't there?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:11 PM
6

So we're not allowed to celebrate male accomplishment? If men take pride in their work, does that insult women?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:03 PM
-5

Why not start your own restaurant chain and offer a Dad's valet?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:52 PM
-3

Are you like, the keeper of the point? What are those days about?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:29 PM
7

Explain.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:27 PM
1

You're running apologetics for these people. Do you really think I see you in a favorable way?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:25 PM
1

You can play your games all you like but the message is clear.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:12 PM
5

FSM!!! 🐙
/r/MensRights09/03/19 12:49 PM
1

That's one ugly bald mofo!
/r/MensRights09/03/19 12:45 PM
1

I do not support discrimination. Do you?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 12:40 PM
1

That's right. Your opinion is not the truth. That's why I rely on facts. You can't change my mind, and you know that. You aren't trying to prove your point because you know it's just your opinion. All you have left is to banter with me because I've shut you down. And your banter is weak. 🤣
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:26 AM
2

You can't change my mind, I know the truth. 😊
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:25 AM
8

lolol smh
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:24 AM
7

Nah, you aren't here for info. And nobody is going to take your bait.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:15 AM
10

We realize you are the poster child for stupid. What else you got?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:09 AM
1

No matter how you slice it, it's still a shit sandwich. Go home.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:08 AM
8

What will you gain?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:05 AM
4

He gave you the information. You can also do your own research if you don't want our word for it.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 04:04 AM
-5

Ah yes. The sad story of the poor girl... ...at the forum for men's rights. Tell me again how we haven't become the 1st chapter of the Men's Lib Auxiliary?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 03:40 AM
16

Your linguistic trickery doesn't work here. Too many of us know the language.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:50 PM
1

Your previous statement is false. You cannot be arrested on suspicion alone. Stop already.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:12 PM
2

Does your life suck?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:06 PM
1

What are we winning?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:54 AM
-1

Yes really. This sub has become the 1st Chapter of the Men's Lib Auxiliary! Go MRM!!
/r/MensRights07/03/19 11:33 PM
2

It's funny because the content here is starting to focus on feminism itself, not the MRM. Soon we'll be the Men's Lib Auxiliary 1st Chapter! lol
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:04 PM
1

You didn't read far enough: The premise of Margolis's (Fix ) effervescent story—a girl uses the techniques from a dog-training manual on boys—has been seen before (e.g., Sandra Dee in If a Man Answers ), but rarely has it been so well grounded and developed. Right before the start of sixth grade, Annabelle returns from sleepaway camp to move into the house that her single mother and her mother's sensitive if geeky boyfriend have just set up. Their surprise gift of a puppy, Annabelle realizes, is…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 07:17 PM
3

Feminist antilopes, I will teach you something today. What Procedures Must the Police Follow While Making an Arrest? When the police arrest someone, they take away that person's fundamental right to freedom. Consequently, there are several procedures the police must follow before they can make a legal arrest so that our rights remain protected. Many states and police departments add extra procedures. Sometimes, they're designed to protect police officers' physical safety; sometimes they're meant…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:53 PM
2

lol!! Once again feminist antilopes, when you can't refute the argument, you resort to personal attacks. Your words have hung you again. Maybe you should think about them first before spewing more lies. See you next time.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:45 PM
2

Sure you do. You: What makes you think it was a false accusation? Me: What makes you think it wasn't? You: I don't think it wasn't. Hmm. If you don't think it wasn't false, that means you think it was true. Given that you weren't there, you don't claim to know these people, you didn't attend the trial as witness, juror, or spectator.... ...we can easily conclude that you have no actual way of knowing if a rape took place or not... ...therefore your opinion that the man is guilty of rape is exact…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:08 PM
3

An arrest requires substantial evidence, or at least reasonable suspicion. Which is it? Evidence or suspicion?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:00 PM
3

What is the book about?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:56 PM
6

You mean you favor a movement that works to create unjust conditions for everybody else?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:41 PM
-3

I see the future I want to have and therefore will ensure I have I died laughing on this! You really are full of it!
/r/MensRights07/03/19 04:40 PM
-1

Heh, now you want us to believe you can see the future. lol smh
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:20 PM
2

Have you read the book?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:19 PM
4

What makes you think it wasn't?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:03 PM
8

We aren't even against the idea of feminism Yes. Yes we are. We fight the feminist terrorists like there's no tomorrow. Because if we don't, there won't be a tommorow for us. Feminism is an ideology of female supremacy. Feminists are not your friends. The sooner you learn this, the better you'll be.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:52 PM
-3

I can say without a doubt in my mind that the woman I’m with couldn’t and wouldn’t do that. Famous last words.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:47 PM
1

That's your justification for discriminatory financial practices?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:40 PM
8

I appreciate your words. Still I find it unhealthy to measure yourself without a finish line. For example, if I want to be the best at underwater basket weaving, I first learn how, then practice over and over. Eventually I will top out and my skill won't improve no matter how much more effort I apply. If I don't recognize my limits, if I keep pushing and pushing, believing I can always be better than I am now... ...I will never come to a point of self satisfaction. Nothing will be good enough be…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:14 AM
5

lol This is our resident rad feminazi. Sad really.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:30 AM
1

It looks like you are overlapping these terms in a strange way. Alphas aren't the only ones that display dominance and aggression. It is very possible to exhibit these behaviors and not be the alpha. As for why a dominant female will dislike the term? It could be that it puts her authority in question. That no matter how dom she tries to be, she will never be the alpha. Truly dominant personalities have a hard time accepting bigger fish.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:05 AM
3

You stated in the OP: not looking for any... discussions on my sexual preferences Then you open right up and discuss your biggest turn on. You like to be in control and set the rules. And break them when it suits you. You get off on Dom'ing the Dom. Even more, you like it when they willingly submit to you. I'm curious, what are you compensating for? What areas of your life are out of your control such that you find solace in this kind of bedroom play?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 11:18 PM
1

Do you think people should work and provide for themselves?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 10:06 PM
1

I'm confident that one day you'll understand I am not responsible for your upkeep. I am responsible for myself, not you. You are not responsible for me. If I have a personal hygiene issue, it is not for me to demand you pay for my products. That's just common sense. I recognize you want to expand the welfare state. You are pushing for socialism. No thanks. I work to provide for myself. Do you work to provide for yourself? Or do you expect others to work for you?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 09:40 PM
0

Yes, you are a hypocrite. And I'm laughing as you keep trying to jab after saying you were leaving. That's the "I lost, now I throw a tantrum" losing beta move right there!! Lol
/r/MensRights06/03/19 09:04 PM
0

No problem!! Run along now.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:57 PM
1

Thank you for understanding the error of your ideas. Take care.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:55 PM
0

Ah. You can't stand to look at your biases so you tuck and run. Oh well. Cowards will be cowards.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:54 PM
0

No no. You are arguing for discriminatory distribution of hygiene products based on gender and specific biohazard. I am highlighting your discrimination. You are ignoring it. You don't want to subsidize male hygiene products. You don't want to subsidize products for other biohazardous conditions. We cannot continue until you recognize your discrimination.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:29 PM
1

No. Not paying for your pads. Your body, your choice. Your period, your problem.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:22 PM
0

Do you know how many biological hazards exist? The flu kills numerous people every year. Do they provide free tissues? Soap? Anything? Your logic is flawed.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 08:01 PM
1

You make a good point about the biohazard. But if you are going to give free products to assist with this biohazard, are you also going to give free products for every other biohazard?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:33 PM
1

You can survive without a tampon. Women have been doing that since the beginning. Can you survive without food?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:13 PM
-1

Your body, your choice. Your period, your problem.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:01 PM
-1

Women don't need tampons. They are a luxury.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 06:51 PM
-1

You did not answer the question that was asked.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 06:21 PM
-1

You didn't answer the question that was asked.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 06:20 PM
3

Very true. Hygiene products are hygiene products.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 05:41 PM
1

I dislike jumping out of airplanes with no shute. Should I try it to make sure?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 04:33 PM
1

If your pet project means enough for you to demand the entire population support it financially...? Then yeah, you need to be supporting it with everything you've got. If you can't stand behind your ideas 100%, stop demanding the rest of us give you money for it. Now take your failure of a strawman back to Oz where you came from and leave my money alone.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 03:30 PM
1

I meant you personally. If this thing is so important to you that you want the whole of society to pay for your projects... ...as champion of this cause... ...you should be spending everything you have on sanitary supplies to hand out. Otherwise you are no better than anybody else trying to strong-arm the common man into paying for their idealogical pet projects.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 02:05 PM
-2

If a man is unable to buy razors, will you buy them for him?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:46 PM
-3

Free food can be eaten by both men and women. Free clothes can be worn by both men and women. Free tampons can be used by both m... Wait. What rationale do you have for subsidizing half the population based on gender?
/r/MensRights06/03/19 01:45 PM
0

Uhhh, what? lololol
/r/MensRights05/03/19 10:49 PM
15

If you always believe you must do better, when will you ever measure up? Depression is fueled by feelings of inadequacy. Inadequacy is created by feelings of not being good enough. If you have no definition of what you should be, you will never become it. Vague proverbs like, "Always strive to improve," only serve to keep a person from ever being good enough. Is that your agenda with this propaganda?
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:37 PM
0

It's a slow process. Eventually this place will become an extension of men's lib lol Wait and see...
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:29 PM
-4

At some point the child needs to have the expectation of maturity placed on them.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 01:51 PM
2

It is truly a sad day when a man feels the need to offer an apology about his perfectly normal lifestyle.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 01:59 PM
1

Since all feminists are terrorists it's moot to worry about subcategories. Like asking what is your preference for murder? Shooting? Strangling? Who cares, you're still a murderer!!
/r/MensRights04/03/19 01:37 PM
6

What is your rationale for saying violence against men is not as egregious as violence against women? What is the difference?
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:47 PM
27

Ok. I made it to 1:31 before I turned it off. This isn't an advertisement for men's health care products. After a minute and a half I asked myself, "What are they trying to sell me? Deodorant? Or a one way ticket to the Army?" I think it can be useful to incorporate stories into advertising but this isn't a story about the need for deodorant and shaving cream. This is an awful attempt to regain lost consumers with yet another botched commercial. The choice of music is ludicrous and completely of…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:52 PM
1

I'm not confused about the message. I'm surprised to find a woman teaching other women this level of submission outside of the BDSM community. It is pretty rare, especially in a Christian setting. What denomination are you guys? I would be happy to speak to your husband. Is he around?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:37 AM
1

To summarize, you are not to question your husband on anything, even if he does not fully obey the church. You are not to speak in church. You have no authority over a man. You must remain plain in your clothing, wear no make up or jewelry. You are to be silent with all subjection. If this is true, where can we find these perfectly sweet, submissive women to have as a wife?
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:00 AM
2

You really believe this: 1 Timothy 2:12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 11:11 PM
1

Do these passages encapsulate your message? Colossians 3:18 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 Ephesians 5:22-33 Deuteronomy 22:5 1 Peter 3:1-22 1 Timothy 2:12 Titus 2:1-5
/r/MensRights01/03/19 10:35 PM
1

What does genuine expression of masculinity and femininity look like? How is it different than mainstream societal views?
/r/MensRights01/03/19 09:06 PM
1

You're a social worker then?
/r/MensRights01/03/19 06:19 PM
1

What actions do you take to correct the evils of feminism?
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:35 PM
7

There are some feminists here that think the role of father can be played by a woman.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 02:36 AM
1

isn’t it a part of human nature to be taught, guided, and directed when growing up. This is true to an extent. After a certain age, the boy was expected to leave the tutelage of his youth and strike out into the world on his own, to finalize his place as a man of his own. We do not need to continually teach, train, guide, and direct a grown man. You put forth a call to action. Joe Blow also put forth his call to action. And Roger. And Jenny. And, and, and .. Everybody wants man to act for them. …
/r/MensRights01/03/19 12:22 AM
3

I was curious about the sub maleempowerment so I hopped over. lololololol I browsed a few minutes and discovered there is nothing empowering there. I'm guessing you were making a joke about that one?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 11:26 PM
1

as men we need to stand up and pursue becoming the men society needs. This sentence is troublesome. You are pushing a social agenda like so many others. Is it so unthinkable to leave man to his own path? Is it hard to believe man does not require micromanagement?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 11:21 PM
1

Correct. The fact that he is exonerate and set financially for the rest of his life is a huge win compared to leaving him injustly incarcerated.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 03:21 PM
2

And he has enough money to do exactly that if he wants to.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:50 PM
-18

That's a lot of noise you're making. Almost as if you declared a war on MRA's. I know, we'll call it a war of noise! And we'll pop in to a sub and seize the moral high ground (without warrant) and make demands (without authority) and finish with sensational appeals to emotion. This will be FANTASTIC!!!
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:32 AM
1

Yeah, that's how taxes work Excellent! I need $14,000 to fix a few mistakes I made. Where do I collect?
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:05 AM
1

I already contribute. A rather large portion of my income goes toward maintaining this great nation. It is not my responsibility to pay for your mistakes. If you can't do the job, get out. Find something you can do. Stop jeopardizing innocent lives with your incompetence. Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:03 AM
1

Good. Now also stop expecting me to pay for your mistakes. Taxes are not there to fix your fuck ups. Get it right the first time or find some less demanding line of work that doesn't jeopardize the life of innocents. Take care.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 01:41 AM
1

Yeah, and now you want even more. When will it stop? When 100% of my income is turned over to the state? Nope. Not happening
/r/MensRights26/02/19 01:15 AM
1

I've already spent. Did you forget that? How many times will your mistake cost me??? Does that mean that you will pay for my mistakes?
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:59 AM
1

Nah. You can't hold the individual responsible for the ills of society. Stop. You want socialism at its finest. No. Just no. If that's how it works, who is going to pay for all my fuck ups, hmm? If I have to pay up front and pay for your mistakes too, then you get to pay for mine. Right?
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:36 AM
6

What it isn't supposed to be... What it actually is. You still haven't answered the question.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:32 AM
1

Meanwhile, you want John Q. Public to keep forking out more taxes to pay for governmental fuck ups. No can do.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:30 AM
1

How exactly was he found guilty when there was no evidence or proof of a crime? Somebody fucked up. I'd like to hear your explanation of how someone who is innocent, gets found guilty of a crime they didn't commit, and say he got a fair trial. Where did I say he got a fair trial? Who's gonna pay for it? Taxpayers, I've already paid for it once, how many times are you going to rape me for more money to cover your mistakes?
/r/MensRights26/02/19 12:00 AM
1

We agree that this is a terrible thing. But the fact that he is vindicated and given more than enough money to live better than many many others IS is huge win.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 11:58 PM
9

How exactly is a female supremacy group run by terrorists with an agenda of hate toward men.. ...supposed to be for men too ???
/r/MensRights25/02/19 11:20 PM
1

No no. I gladly paid once for our judicial system to do the right job. I'm not on the hook every time the government fucks up. Get outta here with that.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 10:10 PM
0

Great, reach into your own pocket and start paying for it.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 09:53 PM
0

YOU are the one advocating falsely imprisoning them. This is more of your manipulation. I want innocent people to never be imprisoned through proper due process. I am glad to pay taxes for proper due process. I am unhappy to pay for your mistakes. You want more money to fix your mistakes. I want there to be no mistakes in the first place. I know how taxes and bureaucracy work. You don't really need $25,000 for a new toilet. Retaxing people over and over because you can't do your job is as unacce…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 09:50 PM
1

I'm asking for taxpayer money to be used to determine who is guilty and who is innocent. You already got it once. And you botched it. You're fired. Next! Much as you deserve to raped for more taxes because of your attitude towards denying justice to others lol I want the case tries correctly the first time so you won't be able to siphon more tax dollars into your pocket. You want more money to fix your miscarriage of mistakes. Your accountant is also fired! Next! There is now a way to stop these…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 07:40 PM
0

Mmm. You dodged the question. Probably because the answer is not pleasant. You see, the state is funded through tax dollars. It's warm and fuzzy to ask the ambiguous "state" to pay for all these tests. What you're really doing is asking me, and him, and her, and all of us, to fund your pet project. You previously mentioned that the state was already funded to put them there, they should pay to exonerate them. I say, instead of raping me for more taxes to fix a problem you already raped me for ta…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 06:45 PM
5

Heh, it's curious how you cry about people not reviving you in your video game... ...but you come here and display no compassion whatsoever. Reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 05:46 PM
-2

lol... Who funds the state?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:06 PM
-4

Are you suggesting that when DNA testing became viable... ...EVERY currently incarcerated inmate should have been tested along with the evidence in their respective cases? An interesting idea. Curious. Are you going to pay for all that?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:19 PM
-3

With that attitude, nothing will ever be satisfactory to you. We can't change the wrong of the past. But he has been vindicated and given an incredible amount of money to enjoy what life he has left. This is a huge win.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 02:38 PM
1

What new industries are emerging that are recovering the unwanted workers as well as the new workers coming of age?
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:01 AM
4

What sectors are you referring to?
/r/MensRights24/02/19 11:43 PM
2

I think you got the wrong poster. I believe that if you stay at home for 10 years and claim the housekeeping is just so demanding while doing nothing to educate yourself or stay relevant with marketable skills... Then you aren't doing good for yourself or contributing to the relationship.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 11:02 PM
2

Couldn't tell ya, never been divorced. This notion that a home maker is some kind of slavish job that keeps a woman scrubbing floors all day... ...nah, this isn't 1930
/r/MensRights24/02/19 10:46 PM
1

What is defined as working at home? Turning the I-Robot vacuum on so it can do its job?
/r/MensRights24/02/19 10:31 PM
2

Beyond the possibility of sexism, there is no right of men being abused in this situation.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 10:05 PM
1

Did I use the wrong question mark ¿
/r/MensRights24/02/19 02:02 AM
1

I'm asking what you think, silly!
/r/MensRights24/02/19 01:25 AM
1

Are men and women different?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 11:34 PM
1

Nah buddy. You want it both ways. One minute you say you used to blindly believe all women. But you also want to trust the accused. Now when I show you this you get all wrecked and start with the ad homs. lolol!!
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:51 PM
2

lol!! A minute ago you were claiming trust was real at one point. Now you won't get involved. lolol!!
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:34 PM
0

Would you trust me?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:23 PM
1

You're saying if I came to you and said John stole $50 from me you trust I'm not lying?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:12 PM
2

If that's true then you can never outright believe the plaintiff. And your whole eroded trust in the accuser is just you being a drama queen. If you believe in inncent until proven otherwise, there is no trust at all in an accusation. If you don't trust up front, there is no trust to erode.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:43 PM
6

I don’t automatically believe a ... victim Good!!! THIS is how it SHOULD be! Just because somebody makes an accusation... ...does NOT mean the accusation is true!! All accusations must be viewed with suspicion lest we incarcerate innocent people on mere accusations. Oh wait, that's the believe all women bullshit. Believe the accuser especially because vagina. Yeah, that's some serious white Knight justice right there!
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:19 PM
1

No. Actual proof of your claim would be measurable data. In this example, you should have evidence of fewer cases of successfully prosecuted assault... (important part coming in 3..2..1..) ...resulting from identifiable instances of eroded trust. But you don't. Because eroded trust is not a quantifiable data point. You can't conclusively prove "trust" in the first place. Trust is akin to religion - you say you believe but you have no concrete reason to. A random shows up and says they've been as…
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:59 PM
-4

You claim that false accusations erode trust. What actual data do you have to support this statement?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:30 PM
-3

Do you have any data to support your ideas? Can you demonstrate your hypothesis is actually happening?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:24 PM
0

How does that work exactly?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:06 PM
1

Is that the best defense you have to your glaring hypocricy? Or maybe you just aren't aware of yourself? I said I would let it slide but it sounds like you want to take it trial. Really?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:29 PM
1

Hmm, let's see. I ask OP a question about the relevancy of this post. You interrupt our conversation to inject your unsolicited personal thoughts about my intentions and to dictate to me what I can and can't post: we don't do that here I reject your false accusations and tell you exactly what I'm doing. Yet you lob more false accusations that you think I'm trying to dictate what can and can't be said. I ask a legitimate question and you try dictating to me that I'm not allowed to dictate what ca…
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:09 AM
1

Nah. I'm questioning the validity of this post in relation to this sub. But feel free to feel superior and judgemental all you like.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 03:24 AM
1

You interrupt a conversation I am having with a different person to belch your unsolicited thoughts at me about what we're talking about... ...and I'm the smug one? ROFL!! Yeah, you can take your holier-than-thou attitude right on back where you came from.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:28 AM
1

If you will go back to my initial inquiry, I explained what I am confused about. Reread it and see if that helps.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:23 AM
1

To summarize, are you suggesting that we fake it till we make it? That we pretend something is true as long as it takes to reach the point that we actually believe it is true?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:21 AM
1

Ah. It's not ok for me to expect people to be specific. Only you can do that. Now I know the rules.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:15 AM
1

An interesting reply. I'm still not understanding how you can simultaneously accept an abstract trait while asking for others to be more specific in their responses to you. Like, it's ok for you to be vague, but you want us to be specific.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 02:02 AM
1

I understand that. It still does not explain the conundrum of - be afraid of God (an abstract idea) and - be more specific and less theoretical. God did not write the Bible. Man wrote and edited the passages of text. God is a theoretical, abstract idea. A multi-user shared hallucination. Be afraid of God. Be more specific.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:58 AM
0

be manly Heh, that's about as non-descript as it gets. Do you know any other adjectives? be willing to die for the people around you Who is teaching you this suicidal nonsense?
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:14 AM
3

I'm a bit confused. In your OP you mentioned god-fearing. What exactly does this mean? Are you saying a good man must be afraid of an abstract idea? In a response you comment: I’m trying to be more specific as opposed to theoretical Isn't religion the greatest theoretical known to man? You are facing in two directions simultaneously. One towards a theoretical entity, God, and the other toward a pragmatic approach to specific detail. Start by explaining what god-fearing means. Follow by clarifyin…
/r/MensRights23/02/19 01:10 AM
10

Feminist ghost buster got rave reviews from critics. Completely false. Google search results: RATINGS • 74% Rotten Tomatoes • 3/5 Common Sense Media • 5.2/10 IMDb TOP VOTED TAGS Cringe-Worthy · Fun · Funny Characters · Bad Acting · Forgettable · Hilarious · Funny · Boring · Over-Hyped · Goofy This is hardly a rave review.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 10:23 PM
-1

What right of men is being threatened or harmed by this event? People being helpful is not a right's issue. It's not even activism for a cause. It's a good deed but it has no connection to Men's Rights Activism.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 10:17 PM
6

For the record... Xena is awful. The sets, the script, the god-awful CGI. Everything.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:44 PM
1

Sure. And sometimes in combat the enemy uses children to bring explosives to the front line. Using your logic, we need to create a controlled situation where children are used like this. For training and all. Sound good?
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:27 PM
2

Yeah no. You are not the man.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 02:07 AM
0

But mindfucking somebody for a reason is A-OK! You are no better than her. lol
/r/MensRights22/02/19 12:37 AM
6

You disagree with something?
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:17 PM
3

lololol!!
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:26 PM
1

You have to admit, one truthful sentence utterly triggered you to DEFCON 5.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:28 PM
2

Yes it does. This was not a hostile takeover. The GSA was against this. If you simply must have a term to apply to the event... ... Suicide... The BSA committed suicide.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 09:37 PM
1

The BSA is trying to improve membership numbers. The GSA didn't come beating on the door demanding to be let in. The BSA willingly invited them in. Girls are in the BSA Because the BSA made it happen. You want to demonize young girls for invading boy space. In this particular case, that is not true.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:50 PM
1

Completely wrong. I posted an article here in this thread. It explains what actually happened. Take a look.
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:35 PM
1

Why Do the Boy Scouts Want to Include Girls? The organization’s decision overturns a historic and defining separation, raising questions about their timing and how they differ from the Girl Scouts of the USA. TAYLOR HOSKING OCT 12, 2017 “The values of Scouting—trustworthy, loyal, helpful, kind, brave and reverent, for example—are important for both young men and women,” said Chief Scout Executive Michael Surbaugh in a statement. “We strive to bring what our organization does best—developing char…
/r/MensRights20/02/19 08:34 PM
5

To summarize... You don't like the way some people live their lives. Therefore you want to force your lifestyle on the world. You want to change the way others live to suit your whims. I wonder why so many people are opposed to your dictatorship...
/r/MensRights20/02/19 04:02 AM
2

False. There are reasons why men show disrespect to another man. Sometimes it is used jokingly. Not usually.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:18 PM
1

lol That sounds like a sure bet. Still though, what right of men is this infringing on?
/r/MensRights18/02/19 05:05 PM
1

Avoiding the subject, attacking me instead. Feminists are too predictable.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 03:32 AM
1

When confronted with logic you just can't manage.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 03:07 AM
1

lol You can't answer my question. Because you know you are biased.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 02:53 AM
1

There is no other conclusion. You don't want to spend equal resources for men and women. How is that not biased?
/r/MensRights17/02/19 02:45 AM
1

I already know why, because you want to allocate funds discriminately. And each time we come back to the basics of true equality... ...you throw a tantrum. I get it. You're a feminist. You want female privilege at the expense of men. That's why you can't accept simple truths and make fair decisions. You are biased.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 02:33 AM
1

Ah yes, you ARE opposed to equal funding. And why is that?
/r/MensRights17/02/19 02:08 AM
1

Kindergarten has nothing to do with this. Nice avoidance. So here's how it looks in a truly equal setting. Total resources available for human improvement = $1b Men receive $500m Women receive $500m What each group does with their resources is up to them. For men, they might study testicular cancer, prostate cancer, whatever they feel is the most pressing issues facing men at the time. Women will do the same with their funds. Are you opposed to this equal distribution of resources? If so, why?
/r/MensRights17/02/19 01:50 AM
1

There are three discreet choices. Are you able to choose one?
/r/MensRights17/02/19 01:40 AM
1

Ok. Let's try a simple approach. Which group should receive the most funding? • Men • Women • Equal distribution between men and women
/r/MensRights17/02/19 01:14 AM
1

Nice try. You are speaking for feminists. You play through oppression Olympics then want more funding for the most oppressed. You think your game is new? You think we haven't seen this trick before? Proportional funding based on gender is discrimination. How can you argue that?
/r/MensRights17/02/19 12:55 AM
1

Your point has always been about discrimination. And when I illustrate it again you want to run off crying that I won't bend to your will. This is why you can't talk with feminists. They claim to be for equality - but only if that means more funding and privilege for women. Get outta here with that nonsense.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 12:41 AM
1

After checking your numbers, they do not reflect the statistics for the US. Nice attempt to skew the data. You also failed to acknowledge that rates of ovarian cancer have been steadily declining for decades while testicular cancer has been on the rise. Again, your idea of equality is to fund based on gender. This is the basic principle of discrimination. Women's lives are no more valuable than men's lives. You will never convince me that one gender is more worthy of help than another. That is y…
/r/MensRights17/02/19 12:18 AM
1

Your scenario makes no sense. Why would you NOT work on a cure? Cancer is a problem that affects men and women alike. Some are male only (prostate). Some are female only (ovarian). Many are both (brain, liver, pancreatic, etc) If we could develop a cure for cancer, why would you not? Equal funding for cancer of all kinds. How can you justify spending more money on ovarian cancer and less on testicular cancer? That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 10:49 PM
1

No no. You cannot change the nature of equality to suit your agenda. If a problem affects both men and women it should be treated as such. Let's run a simulation... Tax dollars are being used to fund a co-ed mental health clinic. Although they recognize that some men suffer mental health issues, the management team believes that these problems are mainly experienced by women. Mary and Bob are two separate individuals. They do not know each other. They both suffer from mental health issues manife…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 10:13 PM
1

Do you really want to do this?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 08:34 PM
1

You've spent this entire time doing whatever you can to poke holes in my logic Well, yeah, that's what debate is all about. even if that means cutting all of the context out of my quote Absolutely. Needless nuance clouds a subject. You add so much unnecessary fluff. I distilled what you said into a primary concept. I'm done I respect that. You tried to prove your ideas. My questions raise concerns for your ideas. Concerns you cannot address. Feminism is undeniable not about equality. Feminism is…
/r/MensRights16/02/19 07:57 PM
2

Heh, I'm defensive for speaking truth. Nice. lol
/r/MensRights16/02/19 05:12 PM
3

Ok. • You dislike feminism, you think it's bad • You dislike MTGOW, you don't like where it's going • Now you are here complaining about this group Hmm. Sounds like one of those women that matter how hard you try, you just can't satisfy them. If you don't like it here, why do you stay?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 04:03 PM
52

What publication is this?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 02:33 PM
1

I stand for equality. but Not equal... Umm. Equal but not equal. How is that equality?
/r/MensRights16/02/19 10:22 AM
28

Exactly this. Keep up the good work.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 01:25 AM
1

You want to fund based on gender. Isn't that the most basic form of prejudice? Feminists claim they stand for equal treatment of men and women. You're suggesting preferential treatment. Something doesn't add up here.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 12:39 AM
1

Women are much more often victims of human trafficking I don't agree that women are much more victims. Do you have a source for this data? Since males are trafficked as well, do we not need to put as much effort into recovering them? Are they less important? Males suffer from more successful suicide attempts. But women also commit suicide. Should we tackle the problem of suicide as a problem faced by all people? Or should we gender the issue and give male suicide prevention the majority of fundi…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 10:51 PM
5

This gave me a good laugh, thank you!
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:58 PM
1

What issues do women in America face that require the resources and privilege that feminism demands?
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:54 PM
2

Do you believe women are an oppressed segment of the population?
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:30 PM
1

Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:13 PM
3

Thanks, good luck in the Oppression Olympics!!
/r/MensRights15/02/19 07:14 PM
11

Your comment lacks substance and is merely you fapping to your own perceived greatness. So congrats.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:42 PM
13

No. Feminism is hate organization run by terrorists with an agenda of female supremacy. Feminism is not about equality.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:28 PM
1

Next you'll be wanting to host a tea party for our resident feminists? So we can listen to them discuss how men's rights activism is unnecessary?
/r/MensRights15/02/19 06:26 PM
1

Where'd you go? No rebuttal?
/r/MensRights15/02/19 02:04 PM
1

I've provided a source for relaxed expectations. What do you have that shows women can perform at the same physical level as men?
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:41 AM
1

May 5, 2015 If you’re ever trapped in a burning building, just pray the firefighter climbing up to rescue you isn’t Rebecca Wax. Or someone like her, who’s been given an EZ-Pass through firefighting training for the sake of gender equity. This week Wax, who repeatedly flunked the rigorous physical test required by the New York City Fire Department, will graduate anyway, The Post reported. All over the nation, fire departments are easing physical standards, in response to litigation to increase t…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:18 AM
1

I've been asking you for sources the whole time. You won't provide any. Yet now you want me to source something for you? lol
/r/MensRights15/02/19 12:12 AM
1

Ok. If you have better data with credible sources, I'm very excited to see it.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 11:38 PM
1

I ask for sources but you keep giving anecdotal evidence. You continue to make broad claims without any corroboration. When I point out that many women can't pass the test that men are given to qualify for certain jobs, you ignore it. In fact, we're starting to see relaxed expectations of women to achieve the same position as a man. That's not equality of opportunity, that's equality of outcome. Is that your agenda? The feminist equality of outcome?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 11:36 PM
1

Why cant jobs just be open to anyone who can pass the tests? This is fine. But most women can't pass the test. Should we lower the standards of acceptance? If you did that, then you'll have first responders that can't perform the task. Lives will be lost because you want to let Becky be a firefighter, or a soldier. Is that what you want? strength just isnt everything in any job these days What jobs are you referring to?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 10:42 PM
0

We dont need to focus on average, we need to focus on individuals. Sure we do. If we're going to examine the overall success of a new policy change that affects thousands of people across thousands of locations, we can't look at one individual for an answer. We must look at averages to find trends of success or failure. Are u saying all women are 115? Also are u saying that all men are 200 lbs and 6 foot 6? I'm starting a foundation of averages of those most likely to be employed as a firefighte…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 09:01 PM
1

If you laugh at offensive humor, if you laugh at the idea of somebody hitting another, you are just as bad as the joke. You can defend yourself any way you like. You can pretend the joke is ok because no names were used. Bottom line: Woman being violent toward husband makes you laugh. You laughing at this joke makes you cringe worthy.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:02 PM
1

Are you saying a 115 lb woman wearing 75 lbs of protective gear can drag a 200 lb man out of a burning building as fast as her male counterpart? No, don't point at the one exceptional case. Show the average ability is comparable between men and women. Show that women across the board can perform the same. I'm waiting for your data with sources.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:56 PM
1

You really don't find the contradiction in that sentance, do you? That's exactly why I pointed it out, to illustrate your contradictory nature. You claim to have the moral high ground by dictating who you can't respect because of certain conditions. Meanwhile, you want the power to joke at the expense of others. You want to choose who you will respect while also choosing who is supposed to take your disrespect. You want to treat others like garbage while demanding respect from them. Get outta he…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 06:35 PM
1

Are you really defending your right to be an offensive asshole, simply because you want to be one? I suggest not laughing at the expense of others and you cry about freedom of speech You talk about how you can't respect somebody that takes offense at a joke directed at nobody... ...while disrespecting the people who are the butt end of your jokes. You are defending your right to be a jerk and I'm asking why do you want to be like that in the first place?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 12:58 PM
1

Is that your 'punch' line?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 02:07 AM
15

Found the racist.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:43 PM
1

Good, good. You are starting to get the picture. you obviously don't tell these kinds of jokes to someone who Now here's the part that will blow your mind. How can you tell who is a DV victim and who isn't? If you can't be sure, isn't it wise not to tell the joke at all?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 05:27 PM
1

If your joke is hurtful to somebody, is it appropriate to laugh at their pain? If a woman is beaten half to death by her husband, is it ok by you to make a joke about her situation? Do you approve of laughing at victims of DV?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 04:42 PM
1

I know! That's what I'm saying! When your wife hits you so hard you have to make up a story the next day at work, you probably deserved it!! Right? Don't worry, when the pain is at its worst, you always have jokes like this to laugh at. Whatever you do... Man up!! Quit yer bitchin! Geez, it's just a broken bone, you act like she actually hurt you or something!
/r/MensRights13/02/19 01:52 PM
-1

Even if she did black your eye, for the third time, this week, you should still be laughing!! Cause this stuff's funny!! Right?
/r/MensRights13/02/19 01:46 PM
0

Yeah, those guys that are being hit right now, as we speak, should laugh with you at this a joke!! Like damn dude, man up and take your beating!! Don't whine like a bitch! Ya know, if you were laughing at jokes like this and not harassing your gf for a bj, maybe she wouldn't have to hit you so often!!
/r/MensRights13/02/19 02:46 AM
2

I wont make any comments anymore because... ...you know you are wrong claiming your opinions are facts. ...your argument that credibility is earned by repeated use rather than verifiable information is not only wrong but malicious in its intent. Using sexist language to define the meaning of words is unacceptable in every way.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:29 PM
5

When most if not all dictionaries put sexism as a common word for misogyny, it is Safe to assume that it is not feminist dogma. If most of your friends want to rape a woman, is it safe to assume that rape is ok?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 04:09 PM
4

You did not provide a source for your "facts.". I conclude that means you don't have a source. Verdict: your facts are merely your opinions. There is no room to argue when a statement uses sexist language.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:59 PM
8

Do you have a source for your alleged facts or are you getting dangerously close to the pit of "Believe all women." ?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:41 PM
-1

What is there to discuss with terrorists?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 06:13 AM
-5

Thank you for admitting your post is not related to the rights of men.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:29 AM
-4

Which men's right is being affected by this game?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:21 AM
1

Discussion (at least with them) is possible as long as we don't start assuming stuff about them, trolling etc. Do you really believe you've miraculously forged some kind of rainbow bridge of love and understanding? Do you honestly think when they go to sleep tonight they are going to dream about treating men better than they ever have?
/r/MensRights12/02/19 03:14 AM
1

lol, homophobic retorts, just like you Frank!!
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:07 PM
11

What good points come from a group that hails as... Against Men's Rights ...?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:33 AM
1

If you are a devout follower of your God and it is the will of your God that you will have biological children, why would you doubt the reality of one day having your own children? Unless God isn't real? And prayer is not a device for affecting change in our reality? Your prenuptial demand that your future spouse volunteer specific information that only YOU know you want is ludicrous. If you want to know something about the person you are considering spending your entire life with... ...open you…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:52 AM
1

Does Catholicism forbid adoption?
/r/MensRights11/02/19 12:12 AM
1

You make a statement. I ask for more information. Instead of taking the opportunity to expound on your point you dodge the question, aggrandize yourself, then try to run me through the mud. Nice try.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 11:19 PM
1

Aha, interesting argument. You can live without a partner as well, can't you? ;). Yes. Clearly whether you are able to live with or without something isn't a sufficient criteria for whether something is important, False. It is clearly of utmost importance to have air, water, food. Lack any of them and you won't survive. otherwise your partner, children, car, house wouldn't be important either. The subject of this discussion is the necessity of disclosure about personal attributes prior to marria…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 10:32 PM
1

Perhaps a more relevant question is not where they can be found Translation: Feminist antilopes cannot answer your question and will therefore substitute a different question that they can answer. Then you ramble on in your narcissistic ways about how well you perceive yourself. So yeah, all these supposedly humble feminists so eager to confess how wrong they are.... ....don't exist. See you next lie.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:12 PM
1

Sure, but I think it's safe to say sex is a big part of people's relationships Food is more important to a relationship than sex. You can live without sex. You can't live without food. Hogwash as it may be, this is still practised by the very religious. In this very case it was practised, so it can't really be called 'hogwash'. In the first sentence you accept that it is religious hogwash. In the second sentence you deny it. Because people practice something doesn't make it any less hogwash. See…
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:08 PM
2

In practice I find feminists are quick to admit fault. Where are all these feminists who confess their faults so readily? Where exactly can they be found?
/r/MensRights10/02/19 04:56 AM
1

True. But... Intercourse is no longer required for reproduction. Sex is merely a formality now. Selfworth is not defined by sexual prowess.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:52 PM
1

Nah. There are many many things in life more important than sex.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:18 PM
2

Me: You do realize sex is not the end all, be all of life, yes? Happiness is not predicated on being able to have sex. If that were the case, what will you do when you cannot perform anymore? Sink into fatal depression? You: Most people that can’t perform do and sec is an important factor in sexual relationship You believe sex is #1 priority. I know better.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:14 PM
1

Me: If that were the case, what will you do when you cannot perform anymore? Sink into fatal depression? You: Most people that can’t perform do Me: So your worth is intrinsic to your ability to perform sexually? You: I didn’t say that No, you didn't specifically say it, but you did state that most people fall into fatal depression once they can no longer perform sexually. This implies selfworth is directly proportional to sexual prowess. This means nothing else about you is valuable enough to fe…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 11:06 PM
-2

Perhaps this is a symptom of a much bigger problem. This thing of needing to know what kind of junk is on board used to not be an issue. Women were women. Men were men.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:53 PM
1

If the size of the dick is that important to you, why wouldn't you ask straight out?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:18 PM
3

When it comes to marriage, prioritize like this: • Money • Looks • Genital size and compatibility • Love That look about right to you?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:17 PM
1

Your analogy is illogical. You buy a car for the purpose of of locomotion. Without an engine you have a deal breaker. Marriage is not performed soley for the purpose of enabling sex. In the poetic sense, marriage is a union of two hearts bound by love with the desire to be monogamous. In a more practical sense, marriage is a contract for legal purposes. The notion that you save your virginity for wedding night is nothing but religious hogwash. To illustrate, I'll expand on your flawed analogy. T…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:12 PM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:02 PM
1

So your worth is intrinsic to your ability to perform sexually?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 07:17 PM
2

You do realize sex is not the end all, be all of life, yes? Happiness is not predicated on being able to have sex. If that were the case, what will you do when you cannot perform anymore? Sink into fatal depression?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:58 PM
14

How did he deceive her? Did he lie in some way? Did she directly ask his penis size and he obscured the truth? If a man has a small package by genetics, how is that his fault? If she loves him with all her heart, then annuls because of physical limitations, doesn't that make her a POS of the highest caliber? If a man were to annul a wedding because the bride refused to suck his dick, would he be justified?
/r/MensRights09/02/19 05:12 PM
1

if I'd had a kid when I was in my 20s I would not have been a masculine influence having been raised by a single mother. Doesn't this answer your question?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:01 PM
1

Fair enough. I agree that children need masculine and feminine influence. I do not believe that women can successfully offer masculine influence. Do you believe they can?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:36 PM
1

So rare they are non-existent.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:10 PM
-1

Ooo, another one of these. I think a child needs both a masculine and feminine (not necessarily a man and a woman) Are you suggesting that a masculine woman and a feminine man can successfully do the same as a feminine woman and masculine man?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:09 PM
2

Which deeply concerns me... that neither sex feels safe with each other. This is brilliantly put. Women are taught early in life that every man is a rapist just waiting to strike. The poundmetoo debacle has taught men that women & sex = disaster in the making. Now. What's the solution?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 05:17 AM
4

neatly stores the digital consent form with accompanying screenshots in 12 different cloud storage sites Let... The Hugging... BEGIN!!! I'm so excited!!!
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:51 AM
5

LoL you must complete the consent transaction before the hugging can take place! Hurry up and sign already!!!
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:19 AM
4

Do you willingly consent to this agreed upon virtual contact: Digital Hug sign here Do you further agree not to claim rape anytime in the foreseeable future? sign here
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:08 AM
5

Aww, somebody need a hug?
/r/MensRights06/02/19 02:05 AM
10

And by your lack of rebuttal I sense your wavering doubt in feminism. Mmm yes, truth is nigh at hand, don't fear it, embrace it.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 01:59 AM
16

The rules of Oppression Olympics state that in order to prove one is oppressed, one must be in a constant state of victim status. Victim status is achieved by vigilent effort to continually find fault inflicted upon the self from external sources. What does such a system of victimhood look like? Who are these people that constant vie for the coveted honor of most oppressed? enter Feminism Ah yes, that glorious organization of hate mongering terrorists with an agenda of female supremacy. Now, you…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 01:05 AM
9

And who exactly is going to pay for all these wonderful benefits you want to give women? Raising taxes means we have to work more to live at the same quality of life. If you expect the business to foot the bill, they will simply raise prices on their goods and services. It's nice to dream about more and more benefits in a beautiful utopian world. The reality is, somebody has to pay for it.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:20 PM
2

You clamour on about destroying people while avoiding any type of direct answer. I ask for a specific ratio, you give generalities while resorting to ad homs. You are crying to the audience for validation as you hide behind no answer. This tells me you can support your statement with details. I've called out your bullshit. Now you are offended. I would run too if I were you.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:20 PM
2

And what ratio of men to women would you use? ps: love your ad homs, they show your true character lol
/r/MensRights05/02/19 06:54 PM
2

So I went back and reread. Did not find any direct answer such as: no, I would not put equal numbers in It is wise not to make assumptions. I did not assume from your response any direct answers, because none are present. Previously you stated: Society comes first. Both men and women serve society in separate but complementary roles. If this is true, your life rafts would necessarily be evenly distributed, 50 % male and 50% female - because both serve society. But your latest response is hesitan…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:50 PM
2

I'm glad I was able to offer insight. Unfortunately I have not gained any from our conversation. Perhaps next time.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:06 PM
6

Cleverly avoided any direct answer. I wonder why?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:02 PM
8

In your worldview, if a boat we're sinking, would put equal numbers of men and women in the life rafts?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:11 PM
2

I was almost on board with you until here: like a little girl. Once you brought out the gender shaming I realized you aren't interested in civilized debate to demonstrate the validity of your ideas. Rather, you just want to brow-beat your opponent into submission by any means. Here, I'll show you how it looks. Hey u/dunesfrank, stop whining about everything like a bitch ass girl. Man up, grow some balls and live your own life. Stop trying to control the world like a woman.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:36 PM
1

9/11 was widely discussed, but it only happened once What is 9/11? It was a tragic event where aircraft were used as weapons of terror. 9/11 wasn't the first and hasn't been the last of these kinds of terrorist acts involving aircraft. 9/11 is not a singular event. Terrorism is an ongoing problem. Likewise, false accusations are an ongoing problem. To be honest, this seems kind of unfair to the women around you This is an absurd thing to suggest. My personal decisions on how to remain safe and s…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 02:19 PM
1

I stand on both legs because I error on the side of caution. If something as serious and life-damaging as false accusations is happening enough for it to be this widely discussed, you bet your ass I"m going to pay attention and take the necessary precautions. I limit my interactions with women to bare minimums. I ensure each interaction takes place in open spaces with others around. If it has to be one one one, I record everything. This is the reality of what feminism has done to society. Respec…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 11:14 PM
1

as far as I know This admission on your part nullifies everything else you said. If you encourage behavior that is fully known to carry huge risk with the justification being that as far as you know it's not that bad... Who needs enemies with friends like these?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 04:11 PM
1

So you are encouraging people to take very serious risks with their lives. It is very dangerous to drive drunk. Some people die from it. Many are injured. There are some who don't die or get hurt. Because some people can drive drunk with no problems do you encourage the act of drunk driving with the suggestion to ignore the risks?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 02:49 PM
1

"People will provoke you until they bring out your ugly side, then play the victim when you go there." If you begin every encounter with this in mind, you are considerably better prepared to avoid losing control.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 03:23 AM
2

But since you don't exactly know how often it happens, you recommend we ignore the very real danger that exists?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 09:45 PM
2

You claim to understand yet you refuse to accept. Let's try this. A gun is a dangerous tool. It can become an implement of death if not handled properly. This is why they come with a built-in safety switch - to reduce accidents. Some women are dangerous people. They can become an implement of pain and suffering if not handled properly. The problem is that you don't know which women are like this, and which are not. To protect yourself, you build your own safety switch by not allowing yourself to…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 09:44 PM
2

Yes, there it is. I respect your liberty to be whoever you want. Do you offer the same?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 07:04 PM
1

Feminism is a terrorist organization with an agenda of hate. If you get off being a feminist gimp, I'm not here to get in your way. See ya.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:33 PM
3

After digesting what you wrote I have complete and profound sadness for you. You are wrong on so many points I don't know where to begin unraveling your indoctrination. It sounds like you actually believe what you wrote. You come across as if you hate yourself for being born male. I mean, we could have a discussion where I break down everything you say and show you piece by piece where you are wrong. But you appear to be so entrenched in feminism that I'm not sure you will be able to even consid…
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:04 PM
2

This is a very succinct overview of feminism. Destroy all that is masculine to promote female supremacy. Are you a feminist?
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:29 PM
2

Nah, there is no original sin. We all, males and females, have the capacity for doing well by others or abusing them. Trying to shame and guilt a subset of the population for what ails the entire world is wrong on all levels.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:27 PM
5

Titles and medals mean nothing here. You are just another rando on the screen, like me 😊 Your hypothesis about masculinity is wrong. And that's ok. It's fine to be wrong. Don't take it personally.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 02:56 PM
7

You are a very convincing troll. Your nonsense will go unnoticed. lol
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:16 PM
6

Ok. Academically speaking, the concept of toxic masculinity is completely absurd.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:09 PM
2

Is it acceptable for a person to hit another for no reason?
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:30 PM
1

Heh, a brand new account has come to town totin' a big ole badge gonna give them MRA's the what for see! Go back to TwoX where you belong lol
/r/MensRights30/01/19 07:50 PM
3

So they call themselves feminists, but feminism is not to blame? lol
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:54 PM
2

And they deleted it. I wonder why...
/r/MensRights27/01/19 11:26 PM
1

What is your connection to Men's Rights with this trainwreck of a post?
/r/MensRights27/01/19 10:43 PM
1

Yes, that's right. Here's what you do: This sub is more and more this and less and less any actual activism or information. It’s mostly “look at what this woman got away with! If she was a man she’d be fucked, proper” That’s like literally ⅓ of the posts :| You complain this sub is not what you want it to be. You complain about people complaining about people. Way to go, Squirt!
/r/MensRights27/01/19 10:22 PM
1

So you don't actually do any activism. Got it.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 09:11 PM
1

You have killed me with your poisonous words. I am slain.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 09:09 PM
2

What evidence will I find there? Be specific.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 07:22 PM
3

Like what? What exactly is the evidence you keep claiming?
/r/MensRights27/01/19 06:32 PM
3

With no evidence of anything.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 06:03 PM
1

lol just lol
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:54 PM
6

The impression that it gives is that the father protects her daughter's virginity by standing in place of a romantic partner until she marries. That you think a father is in any capacity a 'romantic' partner to his daughter says a lot about where your mind is.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:39 PM
3

There is no evidence of anything in this video.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 05:22 PM
1

You gave a guy $1?! Yeah, my last $1 even. He can’t pay his bill with that! Sure he can. He was short $52.84. I gave him $53, my last dollar. Guess he’ll have to ask some other people, too. That's a great idea! Are you offering to help? That's awesome!! Thank you!!! Your very last dollar too? Indeed, the very, very, very last one. How are you so bad at money management?! shrug I dunno, I was doing so good! I paid the mortgage on all of my houses. Then I paid for the Dodge Viper I bought at New Y…
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:54 PM
-1

No can do, gave my last dollar to a WWII vet struggling to pay his electric bill. Try asking the feminists for help, I'm SURE they'll jump at the chance.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 02:03 PM
0

Heh, YOU make yourself a troll. Logically speaking.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:55 PM
1

Surely you must have a plethora of threads you've started in your crusade to further men's rights. Will you link to them for me so I can see how to do this activism stuff the right way? Thanks in advance!!
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:53 PM
2

You beat that pulpit so hard it'll file battery charges against you... ...when the swelling around the eyes goes down enough to pick you out in a line up.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:49 PM
-1

Does this mean you'll be leaving now? Surely somebody will miss you...
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:46 PM
-2

Butthurt Internet troll complains about butthurt Internet trolls. Oi vey!
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:43 PM
1

And now I'm criticizing your criticism of their criticism... Is this like the Hands Across America thing? Anybody remember that?
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:41 PM
2

You can imagine whatever you want in your make-believe forest. Let us know when you have verifiable evidence to support your hypothesis.
/r/MensRights27/01/19 01:16 PM
14

Sometimes you can't see the forest... ...because all those dang trees are in the way!!!
/r/MensRights27/01/19 12:31 PM
1

Ok?
/r/MensRights27/01/19 03:16 AM
-11

Oh my, what a cunning linguist you are!!!
/r/MensRights27/01/19 12:25 AM
5

She worked for him, and it would be hard to say no to someone that has that kind of ability to control your life. Wow, slavery is still a thing?
/r/MensRights27/01/19 12:23 AM
1

The path of a thousand miles... ...begins with a single step. points to the side bar ➡️
/r/MensRights26/01/19 11:33 PM
1

Instead of performing the exercise I gave, you have once again returned to defending your fragile ego. It appears you aren't very good at emotional control; you are too easily triggered. No matter. We won't be able to progress until you stop with the self-agrandizing behavior. shrug Good day.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 09:17 PM
2

oscar_s_r • 1d You sound like a Gillete ad with that “holier than thou” attitude. This is a personal attack. You praised your buddy for being polite after speaking like this. Nice circle jerk. Also they pointed out that calling feminists terrorists without citing any reference is both straw man and ad hominem. The vast amount of resources here alone has proven beyond a doubt that feminism is and always has been a terrorist organization. I used to spend my time doing research for lazy people like…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 04:54 PM
1

Well sure, I could easily explain it. But you've touted your intelligence several times in an attempt to elevate yourself above the rest of us. If you're so intellectually superior, surely you don't need a plebian explaining things to you? Do this for me. Take the two statements I quoted and study them objectively. Remove yourself from the examination and allow the possibility that they do in fact contradict each other. Start from the position that they are in contradiction and work to prove tha…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 01:00 PM
1

Mmm yes. This conversation with you has been very much like pigeon chess.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 12:06 AM
0

As you wish.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:06 PM
1

I don't have anything to defend. • I pointed out your contradiction. • You foamed at the mouth that I didn't. • When you finally realized you were caught, you switched to damage control. • Now you think you've finally won because you've rationalized your error in your own mind. • Now you attempt to use the argument that exposed you, to save you. • And all I can do is laugh. Have fun with that 🤣
/r/MensRights25/01/19 08:15 PM
1

Whatever helps you sleep at night.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 07:00 PM
1

Ah yes, the no contest defense. Very well. Take care.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 06:34 PM
1

lolol!! 45m ago I detailed your contradiction. smh
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:55 PM
1

I've already laid out your contradiction. You reject it. I get it. Your narcissism refuses to accept you are wrong. Your God-complex simply won't allow it. It really is that simple.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:44 PM
-1

lol Your denial does not change reality. If you make contradictory statements, nothing else you can say will undo it. No guessing. No assuming. You contradicted yourself. Back-pedal all you like. Run your damage control until the cows come home. Nothing will change the fact that you contradicted yourself. No amount of philosophy can change what you did. Own it.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:28 PM
1

Broadly speaking, if you don't know what the word epistemology means, you're not ready to criticize feminism from an informed perspective yet. This is your assertion, verbatim from the opening post. You are saying one is not ready to debate feminism if they do not know what a word means. Also known as Gatekeeping. But now you are contradicting what you said with: you can debate feminism at any level you want. And we're supposed to believe you're the omnipotent Lord and Savior of antifeminism des…
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:08 PM
3

Interesting but wrong. You are attempting a gatekeeping campaign to determine who can and cannot debate feminism. Your criteria is simple - meet your demands or they aren't worthy of participating. Nice try but no, you are not the antifeminist Lord and Savior who decides what goes and who can play.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:35 PM
-2

Is it ok to hide the real reason (gender) behind the outward reason (behavior)?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 03:24 PM
0

We don't need the life story of him or her. If it is unlawful to refuse service based on gender then she is in the wrong. Do you agree?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:40 PM
2

Did you take the time to watch the video?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:57 PM
1

Personal attacks are polite to you. And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:25 PM
2

You are free to believe whatever you like, even if it's wrong.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:22 PM
1

Defending your failed argument with more personal attacks is not a winning move.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:45 AM
1

Once you mention Hitler, you've lost the argument. Take off the blinders. Shake off the WaW effect. Do some honest research. Then come back to me.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 12:30 AM
2

And who is your therapist exactly?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:24 PM
-7

You totally missed this one like.... WOOOSH!!!
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:23 PM
4

No. Feminism has always been evil.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:18 PM
4

Aww, you really believe the lies, don't you. Feminism is nothing more than an organization of terrorists with an agenda of hate.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:17 PM
1

Well no, of course it's not rocket science komrade. We aren't to speak of such things, remember?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:49 PM
1

Oh nooo! When the gas ignited the car didn't simply explode, it leapt from the ground, performed a flawless triple lutz, then promptly landed in a heap of crumpled death and destruction. vigorous clapping 9.3
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:47 PM
4

And you didn't answer. Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:19 PM
1

After the crash the gas tank has started leaking. Will it explode soon?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:18 PM
4

Nah, bufedad is just very confused about his place here.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:08 PM
8

So she wasn't concerned about her privacy during intercourse yet suddenly she can't be seen by him during birth? Uh huh. If the birth of a child is one of the greatest moments in life, why do you support denying a father his opportunity to be part of that?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 10:06 PM
-1

Yeah, it's funny how I was commenting on your criticism of somebody's choice of words yet now I am seen as the one using these words. I find that this happens when there's no real defense to be made so grab a stick and beat the subject until it's thoroughly confused, then you feel like a winner.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:41 PM
6

I'm glad you recognize your behavior is feeding the cycle. How will you change that?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:34 PM
1

Ah I see, you can't defend your behavior so you careen off the road into a ditch. Got it.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 09:32 PM
1

Oh heyyyyy! Long time no see!!
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:46 PM
-17

Much like your criticism.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:44 PM
-16

lol The filthy communist wants to give lessons on how to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 04:27 PM
1

It's curious to me, you are against men behaving badly, yet here you are stalking a redditor to harrass them over something you disagree with. Why aren't you holding yourself accountable for you horrible behavior?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:27 PM
3

I sell office supplies. In my next ad campaign I'm going to have a video showing the worst behaviors of female secretaries and use the slogan... "Is this the best a woman can get?" When the shit hits the fan, will you defend my advertising like you have done for Gillette?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:17 PM
7

Does the reality of having feelings bother you?
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:08 PM
1

Huzzah!! This post is a perfectly succinct call to action!
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:46 AM
7

You are correct although it is worth noting that with today's tech, keeping accurate records is not hard.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:17 PM
1

You think we should judge gilette by their heir a century ago, that is stupid, capiche? Eureka!! You let go of the nothing and went back to the original substance!! Yay for personal progress!! It's very OK that you think this is stupid. It's normal and common to disagree with others. Your basic premise is that judgement based on past performance is a bad idea. So I'm very curious to know how you navigate through potentially 80-100 years of life without using any past experiences in your present …
/r/MensRights22/01/19 02:52 PM
1

It's not too late to save your soul...
/r/MensRights22/01/19 02:13 AM
1

Oh no! Your feminazi shame attack has cut me to the quik! What..ever..shall I do? Initiate secret weapon now!!! Full power to Male Gaze!!! beeeOOOOeeeeOOOOeeeeOOOO Oh la la 😏🤭
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:35 AM
2

People complain about ill-fitting clothes. Complaining about the price of a tailor has the same effect as complaining about ill-fitting clothes. I offered a solution. shrug What? Testicles are covered by pants. Thank you for this most excellent laugh. For you see, most men do not go commando. No. They wear various types of underwear; many of which are very tight and form fitting. It’s against the law to have your genitals showing. Yet it's not illegal to show of most of the breasts. Go figure.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 11:04 PM
6

lol!! Flatulence is a biological function that happens to all of us. I will not apologize for existing. lol smh
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:42 PM
3

The understanding that you are choosing NOT to look says your instincts are directing you TO look. You can override your instincts and not look... ...but the reason you have to is because your instinctual, biological function of survival via reproduction has engaged and is directing your behavior. You can't prevent your instincts but can decide to do something else. The initial behavior to look is not a choice. The behavior of looking at something else is by choice.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:36 PM
3

There is nothing wrong with looking at the world around you. Do not apologize for doing nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:28 PM
6

As a woman whose friends are much bustier than me they complain that shirts do not fit them properly. If your body is sized differently than normal, have your clothing tailored to fit you personally. Problem solved. I don’t think every woman whose boobs are out want to be stared at. It’s also a reason for comfort- if you have big boobs having them smashed down in a tight fitting shirt isn’t comfortable. If she is not a nun/ wearing religion garb, what is she supposed to wear turtlenecks in 90 de…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:27 PM
1

Heh, you cling to nothing because you lost this argument so long ago.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 05:19 PM
1

I know what you did and why you did it.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 11:47 AM
1

To hone in on such a small detail and ignore the bigger picture is to intentionally obscure or alter the overall message. That realization is what fuels my skepticism.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 01:49 AM
1

genuineness noun quality of truly being what something is said to be I am NOT convinced of your genuineness. I AM convinced you are not a genius.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 05:54 PM
1

Then I stand unconvinced of your genuineness.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 04:58 PM
1

it wouldn't make sense to force 50% of soldiers to be women So instead let's force only men to die in defense of our politicians.
/r/MensRights20/01/19 01:57 PM
2

I buried that comment in the middle of my post. was not in the same paragraph as there's six sentences and a paragraph break between those two points Your defense hinges on placement of words rather than their meaning. Original but not convincing. Got anything else?
/r/MensRights20/01/19 01:49 PM
1

Hello? Anybody home?
/r/MensRights20/01/19 07:09 AM
2

Why do you want to crucify someone who is on your own side? I am antagonistic for the purpose of rooting out your motives. You claim to be redeemed from the evils of feminism although your dialog suggests you still have lingering indoctrination. Case in point, your last reply is trying to defend the following statement you made: Plus, despite the stereotypes, a lot of us are honest about what we want out of a man, and "feminized" is not there. You distinctly included yourself in the whole 'a lot…
/r/MensRights20/01/19 01:54 AM
3

You conveniently left out this gem: a lot of us are honest about what we want out of a man With more context your altuism isn't so shiney.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 11:49 PM
0

/r/MensRights/comments/ahnzc8/comics_publisher_is_taking_cartoonists_to_court/
/r/MensRights19/01/19 10:32 PM
6

Your story about the mostly feminist so worried about MGM sounds sketchy as can be. Like a carefully contrived emotional piece designed to leave the reader incapable of any emotion other than awe. Lots of women want to get married. Sure they do, because the state sponsored institution of marriage is a perfect win for the woman. Marry well, wait a few years, separate with severance package, rinse and repeat. Men are beautiful, and deserve respect. Yet you openly say... a lot of us are honest abou…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 11:18 AM
1

because it's a dick move Your sexist lingo is still active.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 11:00 AM
2

And still you don't get it. smh
/r/MensRights19/01/19 05:14 AM
2

it takes someone with a lot of guts and integrity to call out bad behavior when they see it. I'm calling out your bad behavior and you still don't get it. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 02:51 AM
3

Just that men should hold other men accountable No Sir. As an adult YOU are responsible for your actions, not I. It is not my job in life to chaperone you around and call you out when you pull a jerk move. This entitled behavior of yours is unacceptable. The world is not here to cater to your inability to control yourself. Is this the best man you can be? Really?
/r/MensRights19/01/19 02:25 AM
1

Berty, you're losin' touch with reality sweety. I just want you to try to source your claim. In my initial post that you responded to, I sourced two locations. When you respond to this, don't try and make some condescending point at me So you've tried to insult me in multiple responses but now you don't want me to be condescending? Ummm Berty, it doesn't work like that. If you take a swing at me then I am at liberty to defend myself as I see fit. You don't get to tell me how I can respond heh. N…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:21 AM
1

Yes. After reading up on your sub I completely agree your space is toxic for men. Thank you for your honesty.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:56 PM
1

In other words, you can't let go feeling like you lost. So to vindicate yourself you insult your opponent. And somehow this makes you feel morally superior?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 12:15 PM
1

So you claiming that my claims don't mean anything is exactly as you say... ...meaningless. So why are you still arguing nothings?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 03:50 AM
7

Blindspot detected.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:26 AM
2

My assertions are solid. You rejected them. Because you reject them does not invalidate them. But we can argue nothings if you like. Really.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:25 AM
6

Ok, let me wrap my head around this. You are complaining about people talking about the Gillette controversy... ...by talking more about the Gillette controversy. ??? blink
/r/MensRights17/01/19 11:27 PM
2

Oh Berty, you have no point to make so you're arguing for argument's sake. It's ok. Gillette is not your friend. Proctor & Gamble is not your friend. They have a sordid history in more ways than one. Let it go.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 11:18 PM
2

I'm all for shitting on gilette but this comment is really stupid. The guy died 50 odd years ago it isn't fair to judge a company based on something like this. Judge them based on their shitty SJW pandering and hypocrisy but not because a dude who was the heir of the company did some shitty things over half a century ago This is your post. In it you complain that judging something today based on past performance is bad. If this is so taboo, why is it happening rampantly? I gave you three real ex…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 07:13 PM
12

men are disencouraged from showing emotions Yes, men ARE discouraged from showing emotion by women who refuse to give attention to "manbabies". Woman: Open up, share your emotion. Man: Ok. I am afraid to do this and that, it makes me feel awful. Woman: Man up you big baby!! If you want men to open up, why do you punish them when they do? "toxic masculinity" ... in reality the term isn't referring to ... it really means ... No. It means whatever is convenient at the time. If it serves your narrat…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 06:48 PM
6

Is he full of shit because Stone Cold Bobby McFrayson said so? Or do you actually have that stuff they call evidence to back up your quippy little remark?
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:25 AM
9

Yeah, because nobody brings up anything from the past... Certainly not the 30 year old rape accusations. Or the 100 year old voting rights issues. Not even the centuries old arguments of oppression. Nah, nobody looks at the past to guide the present.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 04:10 AM
10

Somebody need a hug?
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:12 AM
14

And here we go again...
/r/MensRights17/01/19 02:54 AM
42

And if that wasn't enough for you... Clarence James Gamble, (January 10, 1894 – July 15, 1966) married to Sarah Merry Bradley-Gamble, was the heir of the Procter and Gamble soap company fortune. He was an advocate of birth control and eugenics, and founded Pathfinder International. Clarence Gamble and James Hanes were founding members of the Human Betterment League of North Carolina in 1947. The League was tied to forced sterilization programs that saw both men and women, mostly poor, of low IQ,…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 11:39 PM
-1

Your hypothetical is unrealistic and does not illustrate what you are trying to prove.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:04 PM
10

If the female officer is armed, why is the male officer unarmed? If both are armed, which has more to offer?
/r/MensRights16/01/19 01:44 AM
2

If you agree that feminism IS toxic masculinity then it stands to reason that you no longer want to find common ground with feminism. Correct?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:47 PM
1

Heh, either way you still admit to discrimination. Checkmate.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 08:23 PM
1

You admit to discrimination based on your personal criteria. Say no more.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 07:04 PM
1

So you believe we should respect pronoun requests of certain people but not all people. Got it.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:33 PM
1

Exactly my point. If you are willing to change because they ask you to, are you willing to change for an unlimited number of genders now entering the picture? If I identify as a hammer and ask you to use the pronoun bliu to refer to me, are you ok with that?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:21 PM
1

Why do you insist that it is my responsibility to call you out for your bad behaviors?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:13 PM
1

By displaying bad behaviors of a small percentage of men then asking: Is this the best a man can get? An obvious attempt to create feelings of guilt and shame.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:54 PM
11

The ad is doing exactly that - shaming men into compliance. You think this is super positive. How do you reconcile this?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:49 PM
12

I notice when I ask a straight forward question you change something about a previous answer of yours. This tells me you aren't as solid in your stance as you want me to believe. You claim the ad is super positive for encouraging me to call you out (aka police you) on bad behaviors. But when asked where in the ad does it say this explicitly you can't point to it - because it's not there. When asked why is it my responsibility in the first place you also can't answer directly. Because it is not m…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:26 PM
12

So you're saying that to be the best man I can be I need to be policing your bad behaviors?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:12 PM
7

What part of the ad explicitly says that it is my responsibility to tell you how to behave?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:06 PM
5

It's super positive What are the super positive messages of the ad?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:50 PM
3

Sure they do. We all get to choose. You can't stop it.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:23 PM
1

Because you disagree?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 03:49 PM
0

You ARE an sjw based on the arguments you make. I can't help it you have a hard time with being who you are.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:23 PM
0

I think you're getting your alts mixed up.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 02:04 PM
1

If you want to allow selective pronoun usage in some cases, why not all cases?
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:56 PM
1

Resorting to generic, off-topic replies. Nice.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 01:55 PM
1

Yes, I am asking you what you are doing to stop the terrorism of feminists and their war on men. You. Personally. A list in chronological order would be fantastic.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 05:48 PM
2

Ah I see. You couldn't answer what I asked so you turn to ad hominem. Nice.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 05:34 PM
2

If we need more masculinity to teach young boys how to be better men, what are you doing to stop the feminists from destroying all that is masculine? If we need masculine men raising more masculine men and feminism is fighting against that, coming here to complain about men not being men is helping the problem how, exactly exactly?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 05:05 PM
4

We will have to form a committee and request funding from multiple levels of government to study the possible names of our movement.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 04:42 PM
3

Uh huh. And somebody will hear your cries, feel your pain, and begin a crusade to end the suffering of people like you that only want to be heard!!! A new movement is born...
/r/MensRights14/01/19 04:26 PM
2

But it's much cooler to complain on the way out than just to see your way out You didn't know that?
/r/MensRights14/01/19 04:14 PM
6

We already know why... Feminism is a terrorist organization operating on hate for the purpose of female supremacy.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 03:47 PM
2

It must be nice to live in your world. Unfortunately the real world operates differently.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 03:04 PM
1

This is exactly how to spot an sjw: • Call them on their bs • Watch as they defend their bs by changing what they said Example: Not to mention the additional empathy more women in the military would create would mean less war and less men killed. And I meant empathy for women. Your spin is clear as day. But I wonder... If the enemy wants us all dead and you've filled the ranks with female soldiers, do you think they they will suddenly have a crisis of conscious and be all like, "Oh no, you're us…
/r/MensRights14/01/19 01:51 PM
6

Feminism is in itself a good thing. False.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 02:39 AM
1

But if we're going to open the inclusionary doors for trans, why not furries? And military equipment? And kitchenware? And...? And...? Are you suggesting we discriminate against certain people because of their lifestyle choices?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 10:46 PM
2

And then there's hypocritically thinking your stubborn behavior is not the same as their stubborn behavior.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 10:11 PM
2

You were hypocritically complaining about somebody being stubborn.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 09:48 PM
0

How many preferred pronouns are you willing to remember?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 09:46 PM
1

Transitioning to look like a man is an external change that results in being treated differently by the outside world. However, you will never change the internal workings. I can pretend to think like the opposite sex but I will never fully get it right. Because I'm not the opposite sex. On the inside.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 09:43 PM
2

I like how you call him bullheaded as you stubbornly cling to your own perspective on the subject.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 09:27 PM
0

Hey buddy, here's another case for ya... https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/afjb7h/she_accused_him_of_rape_text_messages_proved_it/ The falsely accused are suing her over this. Go figure.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 07:42 PM
20

the additional empathy more women in the military would create would mean less war War is not a function of how much empathy a woman employs. War is as old as civilization with various reasons for happening. Perhaps you should study history a bit more to understand the subject more thoroughly.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 02:18 PM
8

Paternity fraud is genuinely quite rare, even among women who do not marry and have a succession of children with different men Source?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 02:02 PM
3

Same. So if nobody is bent out of shape then we're all good!
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:31 PM
0

So it's incel bullshit and it's fine... Alrighty then.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 11:30 PM
0

I'm confused. Is it: Mgtoe is incel bullshit. or The concept is fine ?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 08:48 PM
3

No. Did I?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 08:44 PM
2

But you crying about mtgow is not the same. No, you are the only one in the room with a valid complaint. Everybody else is just hatin'. Fascinating. It's almost like you're doing the same thing they're doing, just, on the other side of the fence. When they throw rocks at you it's a problem. But when you throw rocks at them it's ok, in your mind. Truly fascinating.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 06:02 PM
2

Lol, so you're another troll cemented under the bridge. Got it. Btw, stop harassing me with your aggressive behavior. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:42 PM
2

Apparently you haven't been following along. You should read from the beginning ok? Try it.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 05:09 PM
2

Exactly. Thank you for proving my point.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 04:44 PM
1

What if I cry real tears to city council about blah blah discrimination blah blah privilege blah blah ?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 04:34 PM
1

lol, nice try.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 04:31 PM
5

points to really wanted to believe you were just ignorant on mtgow and arrogant about your stepford wife As it turns out, you really are arrogant and have no life wife but want to act like you've got relationships all figured out. Which you don't. By the way, does the city know you're squatting under that bridge, troll?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:40 PM
3

Ok, let's review. • You claim to have a successful relationship • You rebuke the mtgow lifestyle because having a successful relationship is as easy as getting to know the person first thus avoiding all problems later on • When asked about this easy process of getting to know someone so well up front that future problems are non-existent... ...you can't answer. Riiiiiiight. You almost had me thinking you weren't a troll. I really wanted to believe.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:19 PM
2

Getting to know someone is a pretty fucking good step in the right direction...no? Yes, yes it is. And I'm asking you about your technique for getting to know someone. I'll repeat the question a third time in case you missed it... somehow. What are the exact steps to getting to know somebody so well that you can rest assured perfect compatibility and devotion will remain constant for the next 50 years?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 02:26 PM
2

lol!! I love it when people use the semantic escape hatch!! Ok. I'm curious about your theory of perfectly successful marriages built lives together. If getting to know a person is all you have to do to ensure a successful marriage built life together, how exactly do you do that? What are the exact steps to getting to know somebody so well that you can rest assured perfect compatibility and devotion will remain constant for the next 50 years?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 02:04 PM
6

Hmm. Previously you said... a lot of people genuinely want to build a life with a member of the opposite sex It's not impossible No, you get to know her first. Worked for me. It seems you want to give the impression that successful lives built with the opposite sex are feasible... ... because it worked for you... ...after you got to know her first... But now you are all: I am not married? Uh huh. Back-pedaling now. Ok then.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:52 PM
1

snaps fingers I could really go for a cupcake...
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:10 PM
6

No, you get to know her first. Worked for me. Ok. It worked for you. You have a successful marriage. How did you do it? How did you get to know her so well that divorce will never happen to you?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 01:09 PM
2

Are we rewarding virtue signaling with cookies now? What does it take to get a cupcake?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:54 PM
6

I'm curious about your theory of perfectly successful marriages. If getting to know a person is all you have to do to ensure a successful marriage, how exactly do you do that? What are the exact steps to getting to know somebody so well that you can rest assured perfect compatibility and devotion will remain constant for the next 50 years?
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:49 PM
2

Yes, you won. Well said and thank you for taking the time to try.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 12:32 PM
0

So the discussion went well. I was able to demonstrate that if you are falsely accused of rape you have a great case for defamation.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 08:44 PM
1

Are you surprised that no response seems to be forth coming?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 04:44 PM
4

Do these supposedly harmful ideas come only from men? Or are they coming from men and women alike?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:39 PM
2

What are these, certain ''toxic'' masculine traits you speak of?
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:43 PM
8

No matter who you are responding to or why, if you assert something as fact the burden of proof rests on you.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:11 AM
8

This is your assertion: there's zero evidence that false rape accusations are a statistically relevant occurrence. You made this claim with no supporting data or sources. That means you want us to believe you based solely on your word. Ergo: Because user 6data said so Instead of filling in the missing evidence, you challenge me to prove you wrong. Heh. Nope. Your assertion, your responsibility to back it up with credible data.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:50 PM
6

Because user 6data said so?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 11:37 PM
2

If masculinity is primarily associated with all things male and you are labeling rude people as exhibiting toxic masculinity... Then you are undoubtedly connecting this particular inappropriate behavior with males and masculinity. If women exhibit this same behavior you are still attributing it to men and holding them accountable through the connection you have established. You are contributing to the war against men every time you use the term toxic masculinity. Stop doing that. Thank you.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:21 PM
2

Is masculinity primarily associated with male behavior?
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:01 PM
4

by liking girly stuff I meant the toxic part is when someone shames another man for liking girly stuff, This isn't toxic masculinity. This is people treating others poorly. Why is a behavior exhibited by every subset of the population classified as toxic masculinity? Why do you shame only the male population for sins of the entire world? Seems to me you are waging a war against males by holding them solely accountable while giving the rest of the guilty parties a free pass. Hmmmm. What does that…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 08:41 PM
-2

It's ok to try out for the Oppression Olympics. But it does not mean you actually are oppressed.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 06:49 PM
1

lol You questioned the lawyer statements I provided. I sent you to bring them back. Instead you ramble on about anything else. lolol!!
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:52 PM
1

Find the post with the three statements by lawyers. Copy the original question at the top of the post and the three statements and paste them here.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:49 PM
1

How about a few links... https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aaw0oz/comment/ecwry83 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aaw0oz/comment/ecwriuh
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:42 PM
1

Mmm. Your desire to argue for argument's sake has revealed itself. No you haven't, You've shown lawyers talking about proving damages, which has never been in question. This is indisputably false. When you scroll back and find my post with the statements in question you will discover your error.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:30 PM
0

I showed you three lawyers that agree.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:41 AM
-2

Ten days ago actually. Thank you for taking interest.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:42 AM
0

Being all, "Grrrrr, woman rich, man angry!!" is very addictive for some of the users here.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:46 AM
5

You know, it would be really bad if the moderation here reached a point where they started silencing the opposition. I'm sure glad the good mod team here would never do that...
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:34 AM
1

The difficulty of winning a defamation case has no relevance to the topic at hand. Anything else pertinent to our current discussion?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:04 PM
1

Heh, you asked the same question that I have already answered. Did you not like the first answer? Do you think the answer will change if you keep asking the same question? Do you think I will magically become privy to what motivates countless people to do what they do if you ask the question again? Psst, your denial of reality does not imbue me with mind-reading ability.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:03 PM
1

Places where defamation is a criminal act are by far the minority Frequency does not modify validity. That is exactly what you have said, several times Quote the exact text of mine that supports your assertion or do not reference previous statements. False accusation of a crime is considered to be defamatory per se because it is inherently harmful. And this is exactly true. This is how the law is written. 'Defamation Per Se' is a classification of Defamation where the damages are assumed to be r…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 05:44 PM
1

Defamation can be a civil or criminal case depending on circumstances. We've already established that. According to you, anyone who accused someone of a crime in which either the investigation is ended or the accused is found not guilty, is guilty of defamation. Ah, trying this garbage are you? I did not stipulate that a concluded investigation translates to defamation. Nice try. Heh, I see your arguments are becoming personal attacks without merit or meaning. Combined that with your lack of sup…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 03:23 PM
5

I disagree. If the sign were promoting the importance of fatherhood it would say something like... Fathers are very important! or Children need their fathers! Instead it is a message to the fathers out there to make time today to do their job as a father. This sign is not about children needing fathers. It is an instruction to fathers to do their job. Do you know of any signs instructing mothers to do their motherly job today?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 01:42 PM
1

Yes, he has enough evidence No no. He has no evidence of anything. The investigators found no evidence of a crime. But according to you, absence of evidence does not indicate evidence of absence. tothecatmobile • 1d The article doesn't say she committed any offence. Not guilty doesn't automatically mean the accuser made up the accusation, such a claim also needs to be proven Remember that? You believe that finding no evidence of a crime does not mean no crime has been committed. And by itself th…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 01:37 PM
2

Many of these signs exist with different imagery. The text is always the same. I interpret them to mean men need to be more active in the lives of their children. It is true in some cases, the father needs to spend more time with the kids. It is not true in all cases. The sexism can be seen in the lack of the same sign directed towards mothers. I have yet to see a sign with the message: "Take time to be a mom today"
/r/MensRights09/01/19 05:41 AM
1

Interestingly enough, I just finished speaking to a detective about this situation. They also confirm what I'm telling you. Perhaps in your country the laws are different. Where I am, if you accuse somebody of a crime and you can't prove it, and your accusation has caused harm, you are guilty of defamation and can be sued for damages. That's all there is to it really. I'm glad it's like that. It makes people think twice before wantonly accusing others of something they didn't do. Here's a good e…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 03:21 AM
1

We're not talking about case law in it's entirety. We're talking about false accusations and defamation. I've given you multiple posts of examples, attorney statements, directly penal code citations, and the like that supports what I'm telling you. What do you have to support your claims?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 01:00 AM
8

In other words, no, the APA has not codified toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:31 PM
1

And an accusation that can't be proven true is taken to be false in a defamation suit.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 10:27 PM
1

"In defamation can any kind of accusation of crime be a per se claim?" False accusation of a crime is considered to be defamatory per se because it is inherently harmful. To illustrate, accusing a person of murder tarnishes that person's reputation instantly and even if the case has been thrown out. Damages for the false allegation, hence, do not have to be proven but presumed. If someone is falsely accusing you of a crime, it is best to consult with a personal injury attorney right away to know…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 08:56 PM
1

Exactly. Making an accusation that cannot be proven true is defacto a false accusation in a defamation case. The defamation case is not about proving the legitimacy of a previous accusation. The defamation case is about proving damages we're done by an accusation that could not be demonstrated as true. I know you don't like that fact but it is the way the law works. More men need to know this and act on it to slow the tidal wave of bogus accusations. Not all accusations are false. Not all accusa…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 04:46 PM
1

lol!
/r/MensRights08/01/19 04:10 PM
1

No no. If you make an accusation against somebody and cannot prove the accusation to be true, you are guilty of defamation. You can accuse anybody of anything. But if you cannot prove your accusation is true, and by the very act of accusing somebody you have caused harm... ...you are immediately guilty of defamation. That is how the law works. You have a trial. You present your case that the defendant previously accused you of X and by having done so your reputation has been harmed. You are not …
/r/MensRights08/01/19 04:10 PM
9

I wonder, does the APA have guidelines for practice with women and girls? Is there a codified definition for toxic femininity?
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:37 PM
1

Excellent. According to defamation law, if she accuses a man of a sexual crime and cannot prove the case she is immediately guilty of 'defamation per se' and if he chooses to pursue it she can be sentenced to prison time and ordered to pay hefty amounts in damages. This is our defense against accusation without evidence. Accusation by itself causes real harm. Using accusation as a means to harm somebody is wrong and must be punished.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:18 PM
1

You are very incorrect. The tort of defamation refers to a false statement, either spoken ("slander") or written ("libel") that injures someone's reputation. However, some types of false statements are considered so damaging that they are deemed defamatory on their face ("defamation per se"). This is in contrast to "defamation per quod" where the false statement is not inherently defamatory and has to be evaluated in the context of additional facts. Generally, for defamation per se, the statemen…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 03:12 PM
0

Hey buddy, I stumbled across another conversation about your favorite subject... ...defamation of character via false accusations. Anyways, hope you're having a great day!!
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:52 PM
1

Criminal defamation occurs when one purposely communicates to any person, orally or in writing, any information which he or she knows to be false and knows will tend to expose any other living person to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule. The following is a State Statute (Montana) defining Criminal Defamation: Mont. Code Anno., § 45-8-212 Criminal defamation. (1) Defamatory matter is anything that exposes a person or a group, class, or association to hatred, contempt, ridicule, degradation, or…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:42 PM
2

Actually, defamation can be civil or criminal depending on jurisdiction and circumstances. As to the question, are you ok that he presses charges and wins his case sending her to prison for a few years?
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:37 PM
3

A woman accuses a man of sexual impropriety. The man maintains his innocence and a trial finds him not guilty. The accusation has caused the man reputational damage at his job, in his community, even at home his wife doesn't look at him quite the same anymore. The man is a victim of defamation of character. He presses charges against the woman and demonstrates in criminal court the harm her accusation has caused him. She is sentenced to two years at a minimum security facility. Are you ok with t…
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:06 PM
3

Right. Each side is innocent yet when the accused is harmed by the accusation you give them no recourse for being harmed. Why is that?
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:32 AM
1

You know, they are them!!!
/r/MensRights08/01/19 02:29 AM
1

Heh, you're going all meta on it. They won't like that at all.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:42 PM
4

Well there's your problem right there!! You're trying to convince the world that the shit sandwich that is feminism is actually mmm, so yummy!! psst, we know better It doesn't take a PHD to figure out that feminism is evil. But you keep on trying to sell that hot mess like there's no tomorrow. lol
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:41 PM
2

Heh, /FeMRAdebates is just as bad as /Feminism. I love it when you downplay how awful feminism is but your apologetics just aren't going to work.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:34 PM
3

And it doesn't automatically mean the accused committed the alleged crime. Yet being accused creates very real problems for the defendant. But that's ok right? Because not guilty doesn't they didn't do it, so it's ok to cause harm with an accusation?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:28 PM
0

Lol, same ole pac man.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 11:22 PM
0

It's been a few days, how are you?
/r/MensRights07/01/19 04:54 PM
1

Yeah, I was betting you wouldn't actually accept responsibility for your words.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:18 AM
1

If there is a propensity to encourage your son to play chess rather than your daughter, and I suspect there is at least some statistically significant difference, then you won't see a 50% parity. Given that personal opinions do not prove anything as true or factual, do you have any credible evidence to support your claim? ​ you can't claim there to be no barriers - however small - just because it fits your facile narrative. Using this logic... your claim that more sons than daughters are encoura…
/r/MensRights06/01/19 05:51 PM
1

I don't understand your answer. Will you clarify for me? How does our species survive without sex?
/r/MensRights05/01/19 08:35 PM
0

Don't be mad, life is too short!
/r/MensRights04/01/19 03:14 PM
0

Logical consistency...? How very interesting.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 02:57 PM
0

Hey buddy, still grumpy at me?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 12:40 PM
1

How does our species survive without sex?
/r/MensRights03/01/19 12:39 PM
1

You are debating the necessity of sex for personal survival. I never said anything about that. I'm commenting on the notion that sex is not merely a recreational activity.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:35 AM
2

If that's all that took place here, the casual noting of pure truths, then yes you would be correct.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:32 AM
1

You want to debate the idea of natural selection. I haven't said anything about that. I was commenting on the notion that sex is merely recreational.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:29 AM
2

What females want in their offspring has no bearing on the fact that sex has been our modus operandi for survival for what, 99.99999% of our existence. To classify sex as merely recreational... ...yeah, still laughing at that.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:32 PM
5

This sub has BEEN reactionary for a while now.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 11:25 PM
8

Since the beginning of our species, hasn't sex been the fundamental method by which we don't go extinct? To classify sex as merely a recreational activity is laughable at best.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 10:39 PM
1

If you will please direct your attention to the device in my hand... FLASH There is no such thing as the illuminati. Google word suggestion does not have it in the dbase therefore illuminati is not real. Thank you folks. Go home now.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 05:35 PM
1

Heh, how does underboob weaken marriage?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 05:31 PM
0

Doin ok over there?
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:25 PM
1

ring-a-ling
/r/MensRights31/12/18 11:03 PM
0

What part of my post is a personal attack? Will you quote the exact text?
/r/MensRights31/12/18 12:22 AM
9

So you're saying men can be victims but should not make it known they are a victim?
/r/MensRights30/12/18 11:25 PM
4

So you disagree with the premise but you won't state why. Heh, an argument without an argument.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 08:51 PM
1

I included it because I would like feedback from men in this group who are familiar with the lifestyle and can help make connections. So your personal motive for supporting men's rights is to make connections with more dominant males... ...because BDSM excites you and makes you feel alive as a woman... ...and you want other women to experience the liberation that full submission brings to you. Now, are we talking real submission or this safe-word protected kinky Friday night you can dom me until…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:03 PM
1

Are you asking for help on how to support the men's right's movement... ...or posting a personal ad looking for a date? What is the purpose of explaining your position in BDSM and the kind of partner you are looking for if your purpose for being here is to become more informed about mens issues.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 02:36 PM
1

You were not banned for being a man This is not an inference. This is a statement. And your defense is to go on a tangent about aliens. smh
/r/MensRights30/12/18 05:21 AM
1

ring-a-ling
/r/MensRights30/12/18 03:22 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a4evcj/comment/ebe1y24 For your perusal. Do share your thoughts, if you please.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 01:07 AM
1

Which of my word(s) discreetly pronounce(s) an indication of your belief?
/r/MensRights30/12/18 12:23 AM
1

Did I indicate that you indicated an indication of belief? mmmmH
/r/MensRights29/12/18 10:14 PM
1

You are working insanely hard Heh. No burden is too great when it comes to debunking your nonsense. I know you don't like to be confronted but you put forth such garbage that somebody has to say something. You back-pedaled into, "dur hur, it was a joke," in a horrible attempt at damage control coupled with turning your focus on me instead of letting your arguments stand on their own merit. Same old feminist antilopes.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 10:12 PM
1

Don't take it personally. In our current state, every opportunity for feminists to silence MRA's through doxxing must be addressed. If you want to instill confidence in your site as one where men can congregate and openly share intimate details of their struggle you'll need to be better than some fly-by-night volunteer staff. Your paranoia is shining which is good and bad. Try not to let it consume you, rather, use it to navigate the real dangers that exist in what you are trying to accomplish.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 08:28 PM
1

Indeed. Did you see where the good mod was encouraging us to speak on women's issues here? When I called em out on it they shivered like a two dollar bill at a three dollar convention. Good times!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 05:01 PM
1

If he fixed everything by complaining about this sub, what has the sub fixed by complaining about feminism? Hmmmm?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:57 PM
1

Heh. I specifically voiced concern over the high security risk this endeavor has and you completely sidestepped it then tell me to trust you. What publicly verifiable credentials are you offering to convince me of your trustworthiness?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:54 PM
1

lol what?? This oversized text in the OP doesn't suggest any sense of urgency whatsoever?? We Need Your Help To make This Real Get outta here with your nonsense!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:23 PM
0

Yes!!! I ring the bell, you come drooling!! This is so fun!!! lol!!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:43 PM
1

If Reddit is becoming a problem, how will you guarantee your platform won't go down the same drain? If users come here for some small semblance of anonymity under the huge umbrella that is Reddit Inc., how will they feel confident to post sensitive material at a volunteer staffed web location that asks for free security code? "It's a trap!! General Ackbar
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:34 PM
2

You can suggest whatever you like. The funny thing about this situation are the adults who can handle imagery of gentalia only under certain conditions. Somebody may not want to see something but to become traumatized by the image of a penis until, how did you put it, middle age...? Yeah, selective trauma disorder fits perfectly.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:11 PM
0

Still laughing!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:04 PM
0

lol!!!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 05:22 AM
0

lol!!!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:49 AM
0

lol With the thumbs in the ears and everything!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:32 AM
0

Yeah, definitely some OCD going on.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:25 AM
0

Bipolar with signs of OCD. You might want to get that checked out.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:14 AM
0

Bipolar Disorder A disorder associated with episodes of mood swings. You appear to be having drastic mood swings. shrug If you truly want to end the conversation, just stop responding. That's all there is to it. If you are finished, simply stop posting.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:02 AM
0

Tsk tsk. How can I fuck off if you keep entreating me so well? You really should make up your mind... ...fuck off... ...no stay and answer my question!!! Bipolar much?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:23 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/aa9c63/comment/ecri8p9 Four hours ago you posted: You were not banned for being a man That is a very exact detail of what did not happen. How can you definitively claim to know such a detail if you were not involved?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:20 AM
0

I thought you were finished with this conversation? Are you having a hard time over there? Need somebody to talk to?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:28 AM
2

It is your position that unsolicited pictures of penises causes trauma while desired images of penises do not. This sounds like Selective Trauma Disorder to me.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:06 AM
1

I wasn't the claimant. I'm just curious how you can so assertively claim to know the exact details of why that user was banned. Or did you forget that you said that?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:04 AM
0

And you're a supposedly trained professional of psychology? Heh. Heh heh..
/r/MensRights29/12/18 02:03 AM
0

Again you repeat the same drivel. You want out of the conversation but you can't stop responding. Heh, no means no. I won't go out with you. Stop asking. lol
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:42 AM
0

You've literally done nothing but blather insults and whine about nothing. If you detest this conversation so badly, why do you keep responding? Stop blaming the world for your failings. Own your actions.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:09 AM
0

If the shoe fits...
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:39 AM
1

Mmm, you did not answer the question.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:38 AM
2

Does the phenomenon also happen when exposed to random penises in art and other media?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:25 AM
3

Are you saying that women who see a penis when they say it's ok are just fine but when they see an unexpected penis they are traumatized for life? lolol!!!
/r/MensRights28/12/18 11:00 PM
1

You were not banned for being a man Very interesting... You seem to be insinuating that you are privy to the inner workings of this situation. Do tell us feminist antilopes, how is it that you can speak with such authority on the matter?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:56 PM
1

Nice try. You can spin all you want. You can change what you said and try to say what you think I'm saying. We've been round and round the bush all day. In the end, this is how the law works: If you accuse somebody of a crime, and you cannot prove it, and you cause harm to them because of your accusation.... You are guilty of defamation. That's it. Period. What part of this is hard for you?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:43 PM
0

Nope. I am in favor of prosecuting people who cause harm to others by accusing them without evidence. If you accuse somebody and can't provide evidence to secure a conviction and your accusation causes harm to that person, you are guilty of defamation. I recognize you can't come to terms with that. You want to believeallwomen. You want to imprison innocent people. Found the feminist.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 10:25 PM
1

I would much rather someone be condemned falsely This is why you are insanely wrong. You believe in putting innocent people in prison. No. No. No. The law is not your tool for imprisoning those you don't like. No. No. No. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. You are all wrong.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 08:48 PM
1

What is 'per se defamation' ?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:58 PM
0

Yet it does default. Mere accusations are ruining people's lives and you want to let that continue unabated. In our world, right now, if you accuse somebody of a sexual crime, you have instantly condemned them. Is that acceptable to you? Regardless of their guilt or innocence, are you ok with somebody experiencing pain and suffering without proof of any wrong doing?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:43 PM
1

I've already explained how defamation law works today. Feel free to read my comments elsewhere in this thread. When you can tell me what per se defamation is, we will continue.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:22 PM
1

You really want the links to the law firms I reference in situations like this? Then again, if you don't trust my material you also won't trust my sources. To satisfy your need, you'll have to study the law for yourself. To address your concerns about two innocent parties... Let us explore: A accuses B of a crime. B declares Innocence. A has no proof that a crime has taken place. B is taken to trial and found not guilty. There is never going to be a way for B to be declared innocent unless someb…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 06:19 PM
2

See ya!!
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:52 PM
0

If you don't understand what defamation is then we cannot continue.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:25 PM
1

I'm already having this conversation with somebody else. See those comments for your answer, oh sage one.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:22 PM
1

Mmm. More learning!! 😊 Recklessness involves conduct that is short of actual intent to cause harm, but greater than simple negligence. Unlike negligence -- which occurs when a person unknowingly takes a risk that they should have been aware of -- recklessness means to knowingly take a risk. By accusing somebody of a sexual crime, you are knowingly taking a risk with that person's reputation. State laws prohibit many reckless behaviors and look upon reckless actors as social dangers because they …
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:18 PM
1

Today you will learn!! 😄 Harm to Reputation The most obvious negative consequence that a defamatory statement can cause is harm to your professional reputation. Perhaps you are a local businessperson and someone made a statement about you to others indicating that you did something dishonest. Such allegations might cause your customers to take their business elsewhere. Perhaps the statement caused your employer to doubt whether you should remain employed. Those are clear-cut examples of harm to …
/r/MensRights28/12/18 04:28 PM
1

Nah, the only evidence needed in a defamation suit is proof of harm to reputation. In today's metoo witch-hunt world, many innocent people are being harmed by accusations. Any person or business harmed by verbal or written statements should sue for defamation. This is the balance to unchecked accusation. I know you don't want to accept it but accusations are harmful.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 04:06 PM
0

If the man is innocent until proven guilty, then she is lying until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:42 PM
-1

Innocent until proven guilty, it's not complicated. You keep going on with this while ignoring half of the equation. You want her to be able to come forward and accuse somebody of rape with no possible repurcussion. Right? But what happens when her accusation cannot be proven and the very act of making said accusation has caused permanent damage to another? If he has not been found guilty of any crime, why are you ok with the harm caused by her? You want to hold people accountable for their acti…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:39 PM
2

If the accusation causes harm, you are guilty of defamation. What is Defamation? Defamation is the making of a false statement concerning a person or business that damages that person’s or business’s reputation. If a false statement is made and that person or business’s reputation is damaged, there can be legal consequences for the person who made the statement. Defamation can mean many things. Defamation applies to both written and oral statements that are published to third parties. Publicatio…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:21 PM
1

Nah. What is Defamation? Defamation is the making of a false statement concerning a person or business that damages that person’s or business’s reputation. If a false statement is made and that person or business’s reputation is damaged, there can be legal consequences for the person who made the statement. Defamation can mean many things. Defamation applies to both written and oral statements that are published to third parties. Publication includes the posting of material on the Internet. Defa…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:11 PM
1

Lol!! You can fabricate whatever evidence you want to support your ideas. Doesn't change the reality that defamation is a criminal offense. If you accuse somebody of something and cannot prove it and your accusation causes harm, you are guilty of defamation. That's how this works. If somebody accuses another of rape, benefits from the accusation while harming the other in the process, and the rape cannot be proven to have happened... They deserve to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:07 PM
0

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:48 PM
2

Here's where your logic falls apart. You think making a false accusation has no ramifications for the accused. Your idea that no harm comes from a false accusation has been disproven time and time again. So you want to live in a society where people can falsely accuse others causing permanent damage to their lives while gaining personally from the accusation, as in this case where she was given special accommodations. And when no evidence can be found to substantiate the accusation, the accuser …
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:46 PM
3

We do have evidence of some things. • The school punished him on nothing more than an accusation • The school paid him money • she received generous accommodations from the school — changes to homework deadlines, grades, class schedules, test schedules, and even receiving job opportunities — which created an incentive for her to claim she was a victim. Without evidence of a crime, why is he being punished then paid off and why is she being given accommodations?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:30 PM
2

Aww princess, you become very agitated when proven incorrect. You should work on accepting your imperfections and stop attacking those that are here to help. I know this is hard for you. Your narcissism operates on a grand scale. But with time and treatment you can recover. Now put your big boy pants on and be brave!!
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:53 PM
3

She isn't the accused, she is the accuser. You don't believe she is truly a victim. This means you believe she is making a false accusation. Making false accusations is fraudulent behavior. Should she be held accountable for wrongly accusing another? If she is the criminal here, shouldn't her name be made public and his protected?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:46 PM
3

So it could very well be that HE is the victim of her evil ways?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:39 PM
0

Yes babydoll. Your need to protect the female while completely ignoring the male is very telling. Surely as a psychologist you should know that sometimes it's not what you say... ...it's what you don't say. But you go on thinking you are impervious to implicit bias. After all, that is the nature of it, to not realize we are biased about some things.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:36 PM
6

So you don't believe she is a victim here. And if she is making accusations without being a victim of any crime... that means you DO believe she has malicious intent to cause pain and suffering. Can you explain why you want to protect her name when you believe she has malicious intent?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:30 PM
1

Yet you didn't mention it until asked. That indeed makes it complicated. Why would you be so focused on the female and ignore the male unless provoked to do so? Implicit bias.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:25 PM
4

Do you believe that all accusations are true until proven false?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:19 PM
6

Do you believe she is truly a victim in this case?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:17 PM
5

I'm curious about something. If you are so concerned about the alleged victim and want to reduce their academic workload and allow time extensions on assignments because of the stress they are experiencing... What academic accommodations are you offering the alleged perpetrator who's life is now being interrupted by the accusations?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:14 PM
-2

Women should not file false accusations. It's not hard to understand.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:20 PM
1

Nah, you just want to stir the pot.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 05:34 PM
1

As a self-proclaimed psychic egg you didn't see this coming? You post an image that is obviously offensive to the group you are posting to. You receive angry replies in return. You get angry yourself and make a new post chastising people for expressing their anger in ways you do not approve of. And when you aren't worshipped for your stunning intelligence and people don't immediately beg your forgiveness... ...you moan about how this place isn't for you? ROFL!!! ding. For your convenience, exits…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 05:03 PM
1

I noticed you edited your comment to include a mention to me. Did you think I didn't read it initially? Or are you hoping for a response? You didn't leave much on the table to talk about. It is indeed valuable to remember the past although I'm unclear if you have the winning strategy to solve the battle of the sexes. Do you?
/r/MensRights25/12/18 11:04 PM
2

Every religion is a cult. However, many people cannot be decent people without fear of a higher power. So while religion is a horrible institution, it has nominal value.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 10:21 PM
1

lol, yes, you are talking about entitled women, entitled attention seeking women. Not... Men's Rights. But for some unknown reason you think shit posting about obnoxious women is going to improve the plight of men and bring balance to society. O...K...
/r/MensRights23/12/18 11:49 PM
2

Feminism hasn't changed, it still operates with the agenda of female supremacy.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 02:46 PM
7

What is the purpose of making this post? Do the Suffragists still exist today?
/r/MensRights23/12/18 02:22 PM
4

Here's a quick way to answer the question, "What does this have to do with men's rights?" • Is the subject of the post about a woman? • Is the woman doing something? If you answered yes to either question... Congratulations! You passed the test for relevant content!! The irony, of course, is that many of these posts complain about attention-seeking women... ...by doing exactly that...giving them more attention. Way to go fellas!!! Fight for your rights by posting more content about the women you…
/r/MensRights23/12/18 02:14 PM
0

Private business, public business, corporate entities, it doesn't matter... Somebody ALWAYS wants something for free. I'm still not seeing anything in the OP that explicitly creates an expectation of free work.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 01:04 AM
3

If ALL women work less hard this would be a statement of fact. Since some women harder than some men, the statement is merely opinion.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 03:02 PM
-3

Heh. Ok. What is an opinion?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 12:57 PM
1

Will you quote the exact text that creates an expectation of free service?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:36 PM
0

Where is there an expectation of free service?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:40 PM
1

It may not be free to you, but I promise you, if somebody refers a new client to me without asking for a finder's fee, that's free advertising. Take care!
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:31 PM
0

...still waiting...
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:20 PM
1

By trying to get me to do work for free you're scamming me lolol!! I'm not doing anything of the sort, I'm telling you that free advertising is a good thing. Wow man, this thing really triggered you. Rant on, don't mind me. lol
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:19 PM
0

...still waiting...
/r/MensRights21/12/18 04:12 PM
0

For my actions of asking you a question? Nah. You know better than that. We've already discussed where you went wrong. All you have to do is scroll up and reread it. ...still waiting.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:57 PM
1

I thought you were above making assumptions. I get that you don't like what I'm saying but the reality is, billions are spent on marketing and advertising. You are trying to convince us that free advertising is somehow a bad thing. Hell, there are companies in business for the sole purpose of marketing other businesses. Who would have thunk it??? Now, I'm definitely not the sharpest tool in the shed but it doesn't take a Phi Beta Kappa to know that free advertising is a good thing. But, once aga…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:50 PM
0

Are you afraid to take responsibility for your actions? Once you recognize you were wrong and apologize, I will answer your question.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:20 PM
-1

Take your time. When you are ready to apologize, I'll be here.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 03:06 PM
1

Sure, there's lots of risk involved in business. That's not new. Complaining about somebody sending you potential business leads? I mean, ok, if you don't want the business I'll tell them to go somewhere else. A personal phone number being given to a stranger - very problematic. A business number used to contact a business for the purpose of doing business .. Heh, that should be a no brainier.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:59 PM
-2

Declaring something is irrelevant does not absolve you. Take responsibility for your wrong action. Apologize. Then we will continue.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 02:07 PM
-2

You're really trying everything to avoid the question aren't you? I'm following your style of debate. I initially asked: If you don't want children, why are you making them? You avoided the question by responding about birth control. If I don't want a sandwich, I'm not going to get out the bread or the deli meat or the mustard. Likewise, if I don't want children I'm not going to have sex. If I asked you why are you getting out the makings for a sandwich if you don't want a sandwich, and you repl…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:51 PM
1

It takes a real man to stand up against the bs of being real men. Am I doing this right?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:15 PM
1

On the other hand, business advertising is often performed by word of mouth. Bob pays for a service. He is pleased with the work and recommends them to his friends and family. Seemingly random people start calling the business in need of their service. Why is this a bad thing?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:10 PM
0

Hmm. You are unable to say mommy who wants to dump her child. Why is that? Is it because when you look at the situation without all the PC cover the reality is incomprehensible? That a woman could actually not be the wonderful, loving, caring mommy that we want to think she is? It's almost as if you are trying to sterilize the situation. By changing the word from mommy to parent you are trying to detach the person from the atrocity. Mommy would never abandon her child, but a negligent parent wou…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 12:50 PM
2

By negligent parent do you mean mommy who wants to dump her baby at a safe surrender site?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 11:40 AM
2

there are going to be people who are going to find out after the fact that they just can't, or don't want to be parent You're right. It happens so often there are numerous places for women to abandon their children without consequence. What a wonderful thing it must be to decide one day you just don't want to be mommy anymore. And to solve your problem you simply abandon your children at a safe surrender site kinda like taking trash to the dumpster. Yeah, mommy's off the hook and it's great for …
/r/MensRights21/12/18 10:59 AM
2

How about we teach responsibile sex and responsible parenting? If you can't do the time...
/r/MensRights20/12/18 11:57 PM
2

lol! For a moment I thought you were actually trying to present evidence that abstinence leads to children. Then I saw that you linked to some religious dogma. That's when I really started laughing!!!
/r/MensRights20/12/18 11:05 PM
6

Actually there's one method that is 100% effective every single time... Abstinence. I know I know, you crazy kids and your neeeeeeeeds. But the truth is, no sex, no babies!
/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:09 PM
1

Why is it wrong to say it out loud?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:03 PM
8

Do you disagree with personal responsibility?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:25 PM
5

If you don't want children, why are you making them?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:23 PM
1

Ok thanks!
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:40 PM
9

... what?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:10 PM
11

Ummm, ok? I agree we should hold parents personally responsible for their children. Now, how do we do it?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:45 PM
3

lol!
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:42 PM
8

I'm not sure how that relates?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:19 PM
68

Gee, I don't know, perhaps the people that made the child should be responsible for it? I understand this is very progressive thinking but it sounds reasonable that if you create a child, you should take care of it.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:11 PM
2

I like this debate and I want to add something but not to the main topic. You said, Yes, humans are complex, and I find consist more of exceptions than of rules. Ok. You can't have exceptions without rules. If you are seeing an exception, there must be a rule it is an exception to. If the amount of exceptions to a particular rule outnumber the cases of adherence to the rule... Doesn't that mean the exception is actually the rule and the rule is the exception?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 02:25 PM
133

And get rid of it, at taxpayer expense.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 02:13 PM
4

feminism means equality False. [Feminism] means equality + certain advantages for women True.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 02:09 PM
5

Nice shaming technique. Did you borrow that from the feminist handbook?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 01:47 AM
1

lol!!!
/r/MensRights19/12/18 03:35 PM
1

lolol!! A for effort!
/r/MensRights19/12/18 11:08 AM
0

You support Rommel who supported and fought for Nazi, Germany. I wonder if this is why some really far out feminists are called... Feminazis And like your friend, the bratwurst, you have revealed your true nature. You admitted to being a fraud. Now you want to go off into debates about Nazis. pat pat
/r/MensRights19/12/18 03:01 AM
1

You claim: Rommel wasn't a Nazi History.com says: Following World War II, the Western Allies, now locked in an ideological struggle with the Soviet Union, made efforts to resuscitate Germany’s reputation. In so doing, they portrayed Rommel as a chivalrous combatant, pointing out, among other things, that he apparently never joined the Nazi Party. Yet his devotion to Hitler was incontrovertible. When Hitler took power, Rommel approved of his remilitarization plans, calling him the “unifier of the…
/r/MensRights19/12/18 12:49 AM
1

Aww, somebody's triiiiggggerrred...
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:32 PM
2

LOL!! Now you align yourself with Nazies!!! Radical feminism is alive and evil as ever.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 10:31 PM
1

After openly admitting you are a fraud you still believe you are morally superior. I'm laughing my ass off at you!
/r/MensRights18/12/18 08:30 PM
1

I'm having a conversation with somebody else that you feel the need to rush in and white knight. After admitting you pretend to be somebody you aren't, you are now projecting your motives onto me. Dr. Phil would have a field day with you.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 08:16 PM
0

Yup, you are the epitome of 'white knight'.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:54 PM
-1

u/cutelilbratwurst You're trying to call me a misandrist because I made a joke about neckbeards? Sounds like something a neckbeard would say. Maybe you'd feel better if you took a shower. You put a lot of effort into this and I appreciate your dedication but come on, dude. There's bigger and better things outside mom's basement. And with that one paragraph you have revealed yourself. It's difficult to hide soul-burning hatred for very long.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:50 PM
-2

Why do you feel the need to rush in and defend the damsel? Are you a white knight? Is she in distress? Do you think speaking on her behalf is going to solve her problem? Is she not an empowered woman of 2018? She can't speak for herself?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:03 PM
1

Ok then, take care!! 😂
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:47 PM
1

You said it is acceptable to insult people. I insult you and you respond with: No defense of your argument and you went straight to the insults Are you offended by my insults that you approve of?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:31 PM
1

Ok. I retract. You don't understand.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:27 PM
-2

All of my most downvoted comments are in support of men and their rights and I'm fucking sick of it. Here you are ranting about being downvoted. Even making this post is likely to get me brigaded, but fuck it. More anger about what will happen to you. This attitude, this hive-mind, is saddening and infuriating. I stand by every word I said and refuse to further attempt to justify myself to fourth-wave "feminists" and brainwashed, stubborn idiots who for some unfathomable reason are utterly convi…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:22 PM
0

Based on your responses I will add 'retarded' to the list of insults for you. lol
/r/MensRights18/12/18 04:13 PM
0

I see you understand. Good grasshopper.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 04:11 PM
1

I wasn't telling you specifically to stop. You took my comment in response to yours to mean I was speaking to you. Why did you do that?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:21 PM
0

lol By your reasoning it is acceptable to call you a dumbass sexist. Because it is a mostly deserved insult. smh
/r/MensRights18/12/18 03:07 PM
-7

So I'm a little confused. You make a rant post about being a victim of feminist hate via extension of the hate toward men. You rage against the injustice men face and their lack of support. Yet you personally perpetuate classic anti-male stereotypes? Only a few months ago you created this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/Showerthoughts/comments/9dcahx/neckbeards_are_to_gaming_stores_as_drunks_are_to/ neck·beard noun a growth of hair on a man's neck, especially when regarded as indicative of poor g…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 01:58 PM
0

Stop.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 10:46 PM
-2

I am replying to your comment but I'm not talking to you. lol Nice try, Sandy.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 04:08 PM
4

I like how you chastise the sub with: When will people learn to appreciate our differences and come together, not split up in groups and categories. Then you follow up by spliting people into groups: Why don't you people Clearly you aren't practicing what you preach.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 10:39 PM
2

Heh, if you are able to turn off that raging anger that boils inside of you... ...you'll notice it was a different user that suggested you chill out. And, frankly, I have to say it was good advice seeing how triggered you are.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 01:57 PM
12

How are they: now on par with the feminist cunts you hate. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:46 PM
5

How are they worse than feminists?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 12:43 PM
1

I like that. Perhaps you should remain silent more often.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 03:10 PM
1

The first step in solving a problem is raising awarness. By raising awareness of this problem I contributing to the solution. And you? What have you done to solve this problem?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:54 PM
2

This is another demonstration of the increasing amount of content not directly related to men's rights. Then one could follow the rabbit hole to discover why this is happening more often and who is doing it.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 02:24 PM
-8

Very little content here has any direct relation to men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 12:59 AM
2

Umm, lol, if the scene that produced this post is still alive and well, this material is still perfectly relevant. Don't worry, when you get older,2 years won't be that long ago.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 12:50 AM
1

Because you are unable to look beyond the surface?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 12:42 AM
2

Has the sociopolitical climate in the West changed so much in two years to make this post irrelevant?
/r/MensRights14/12/18 12:10 AM
1

And for karma farming.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 07:53 PM
3

I don't think it should be an entitlement at all considering its your own personal choices that lead to the expense. Therein lies the problem. Personal responsibility has been outsourced to commercial businesses and government agencies. Both groups are ok with it. They simply extract more resources from the citizens for less in return to offset the growing cost of building our new communism.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 02:09 PM
-1

Of course not Thank you for responding.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 02:04 PM
4

If they do for some, why not all?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:45 PM
29

Should the military pay soldier child support?
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:10 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:05 PM
1

Since you started that post with "Since you started that post" lolol!!! You'll be ok.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:01 PM
2

There is an enormous amount of information here about the evils of feminism from inception until now. If you stick around long enough you will encounter it.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 11:40 PM
3

Religion fits many of these cult checklists.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 08:56 PM
1

lolol!! I'm going to refute the rest of your post using your own tactics - by ignoring what it says. Is this your example of: trying to be reasonable with you. ??? I thought we already said our good byes? Your post is now refuted. Good day. Yet here you are clamoring on. Your "science" can be debunked without even looking at it, that's how awful it is. Your fanatical need to force the world to believe your religious bullshit is chewing at you like a savage beast and you can't let it go. You clai…
/r/MensRights12/12/18 01:39 PM
1

Toxic masculinity is not an actual thing. People behaving poorly is a thing.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 12:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter