TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Talbooth Archive

View 1 posts and 622 comments by Talbooth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

I also bet they are mostly right handed. Down with right handed people, they are filthy pro-lifers! /s (seriously, this comment reeks of apex fallacy and a lack of understanding between correlation and causation)
/r/MensRights25/11/22 07:41 PM
1

It's nice but naive that you think popular opinion matters anything in this case.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 08:32 PM
11

But if it was a SAH husband who expected the wife to make (and not dare order!) food for him from the wife who got home from work, AITA would trip over themselves to see who can tell OP to "put that lazy POS on the street ASAP", even without the severe chronic pains.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 04:21 AM
10

I generally don't support the death penalty, but if I did I would want the system to make really fucking sure that the person executed is actually the guilty party.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/22 04:56 AM
9

Women and Equalities minister Which one? Because that title is a walking oxymoron.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/09/22 12:56 PM
23

It's an automated process, you are now banned from dozens of subreddits for wrongthink*. * they don't actually check what you have written, just commenting here is enough
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/22 04:03 PM
20

Haha C cup isn't that big, man idiot. That's... Not the point? The exact "requirement" isn't important as long as it's an unchangeable part of someone's body, as that is used to point out how he doesn't appreciate her having requirements for his unchangeable body properties.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/08/22 03:01 PM
2

No. It should be presented as an "according to X, this is the case, and if statistics doesn't support it, this is why X thinks the statistics are wrong" structure for all the reasons I said in my last comment.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:46 PM
9

You do understand that by the very nature of what being underreported means, it cannot be proven true or false by statistics, right? The very claim is that at least one of the 1/4 or 1/10 figures is inaccurate or outright false. Arguments can be made for ("men are less likely to report because they would be treated as the abusers", etc.) or against ("men are stronger, so it seems reasonable that they are less likely to be the target of violence", etc.) but that's it. Until we have so much data t…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:33 AM
6

Advise your husband to request every instruction in writing "to resolve inconsistencies in what instructions he seemed to receive and what instructions his boss seems to have given". If it's an office environment, she can solve it via e-mail, if it's some kind of physical labor, he can just keep an A4 paper and a pen on him with 2-3 lines of space for details and a field for time of giving the instructions. Make sure the boss either writes every instruction herself or signs them, otherwise she c…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:17 AM
9

Yes, IIRC that's the event where the infamous RED came from, who is in the picture of r/MRAMemes. EDIT: I just remembered things I thought I already forgot, and man, early 2010's feminist vs. anti-feminist social media (mainly YouTube) was wild.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:34 AM
1

I mean I can understand. Imagine you are already full and your mother bakes a cake. She cuts it into 5 pieces for herself, your father, and your 3 brothers and they eat it in front of you without saying a word. When you call her out, she just says "you weren't hungry". Yes, you would have declined it if she asked whether you want cake or not, but it still sucks that she didn't even asked when everybody else got some.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:29 AM
3

I think r/MRAMemes is a thing.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:27 AM
3

It represents a commitment to the cheating. It's not some spectrum like emotions where you can decide to go only so far, it's all or nothing. If your partner flirts with her coworker, she is, IDK, 20% cheating, but if he sleeps with him, it's 100%.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 10:12 AM
1

It's especially idiotic in the UK as noone in the UK can vote in the US, but even if she was in the US - not having sex until you want kids is what conservatives who are against abortion want you to do.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:32 AM
3

I had to scroll a freaking mile to find this comment. The amount of people in this comment section who don't get that this is a "See, this is how much you like it when we make rules about your body" moment for the people saying this and they don't actually support it is unbelievable. I know, it's a bad analogy, but it's still just an analogy.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:04 PM
1

They have, but they are even further into insanity than the mods who do this.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 11:19 PM
6

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights14/06/22 06:57 PM
13

Good luck in getting them both back :)
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/22 05:41 AM
18

That's just sad. I hope you have dealt with the emotions that come from that and now live a peaceful life.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/22 04:49 AM
11

I understand not punishing someone if they have a mental disorder, but at least give them a restraining order (or German equivalent) so they can be removed from the vicinity of the other person if found there again, or do something to protect the victim.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/02/22 11:43 AM
3

I think you should make a poll, at least with a yes and a no comment one can upvote. I'm firmly in no territory - cuddling is awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 01:19 PM
7

you and every other party involved will agree to a safe word to use when active consent is no longer given Sarcastic here or not, what I like in BDSM is that all parties pre-agree on an unmistakable action that one does when they no longer wish to participate, and this practice is considered a must in every "scene" between any two people in the community. It makes things so much easier.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:43 PM
6

So basically how some more hardcore porn producers do it
/r/MensRights10/09/21 03:34 PM
0

No method of contraception is 100% effective, you don't have to be "irresponsible" to become pregnant against your will.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 09:26 AM
87

"I'm sure if I just acid attack him he will see the error of his ways and marry me!" - his ex, probably
/r/MensRights05/09/21 08:45 AM
2

they ruled that a woman can demand that I date her, or she's allowed to run me out of my job. We'll need more details on that, because what the fuck?
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:34 AM
1

Please, before you do anything you cannot take back... read my comment, and others that I'm sure will appear in no time. Get dating out first: you can't and won't get a (stable) relationship until you pick yourself up. Not in the "be an overly masculine fuck with a perfect life" sense, but in a "love yourself and make peace with yourself" sense. But that is ok, you don't NEED another person to be with you to be your full self. That comes when you already are, so don't worry about it for now. Bes…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 04:17 AM
4

I heard an explanation mixing these two phenomena- women are taken less seriously by healthcare professionals because they often go with every minor thing, but a man only goes if he is basically dying.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:59 PM
3

I guess it is supposed to say "Where people actually stand shows what they believe", it just came out awkward.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 01:03 PM
16

If you had a medical reason (not being able to retract foreskin resulting in health issues) and other treatments didn't help, you had a good reason to do it, and it was the necessary thing to do. Just like having your tonsil removed if it causes problems.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 06:43 AM
9

Over you there is a value of $3.7 per gallon. Currently average gas prices where I live is $5.63 per gallon.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 11:02 AM
1

They have certain standards and approaches and view them as the “correct” way Not for women, but for people in general: when someone does this, it drives me up the wall. I'm doing something and someone is just "no, you have to do this and this to achieve this" and it just adds three hoops to the task. Don't get me wrong, if it actually improves the process or the outcome I welcome criticism, but it's often the same outcome but with more effort or weird ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 07:53 PM
3

Of course the "undecided" cases wouldn't be punished either way. Only the ones where guilt of rape or guilt of false accusation of rape can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Being alone in the same room and a he said/she said afterwards falls in the middle territory.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 10:13 AM
2

Yes, there are numerous sites for analyzing reddit, either uptime, userbase of subreddits, etc. There are also studies out there on which words certain subreddits use much, what are their demographics, political alignments, ...
/r/MensRights03/06/21 03:23 PM
4

I mean apart from a few "everyone is asshole"-s the comments agree that the mother is overbearing.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:02 PM
2

Your behaviour is so far from controlling and abusive that I cannot even fathom how that friend came to this conclusion. You should start carrying her pills, too. I think she lost them that day.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 08:48 AM
2

Well, somewhere in-between. I have seen it happen more and more often in the last few years that women weren't believed when they said they were raped, mostly by people who have seen a oot of stories on false accusations and their consequences. But it's just anecdotal, I haven't seen and categorised thousands upon thousands of these incidents.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:08 PM
2

Why? Less and less people believe that the rape actually happened, they think it's like with all the other women who lied. This doesn't necessarily make it harder to puah the case through a court, but puts a "social pressure" on the accuser which women generally really can't bear.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 07:19 AM
19

Teaching martial arts often go hand in hand with teaching respect, manners, and how hurting or putting down others is wrong, doesn't it? Use that opportunity to not just teach them how to be good at fighting, but how to use that power responsibly, and how to extend this to how they generally treat each other.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 04:00 PM
9

barges in "MRAs and feminists are the same thing" refuses to elaborate leaves EDIT: props to op, they actually wrote about their position.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 04:00 PM
2

A woman has an opinion about gender equality that you don't agree with? Must be only to get sex! That whore! /s
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:32 PM
2

To add to u/Test-writer's response, look up "violence by proxy" - it is a popular tactic for violent women to use when they are not physically strong enough to enact harm (while violent men usually just beat the shit out of whoever is the target, or stab them). While it's a popular statistic that X percent of violent criminals are men (usually 75 <= x <= 98 depending on the source), also compare the number of violent criminals by sex to the total male/female population. To find reasons, I sugges…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 06:07 AM
3

r/findareddit
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:54 AM
24

"But that's true" is also not an argument.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:05 AM
3

Because movements are made of of several people who might have differing opinions, the following will be a generalisation of what seems to be the most widespread kind of opinion towards circumcision in the movement. Intactivism doesn't want to purge any and all instances of circumcision ever. It is about consent and medical necessity. If you are over 18 and WANT TO get circumcised, good for you, go ahead. If you are not 18, but for some reason it is absolutely necessary to circumcise you, intact…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:01 AM
3

If you start thinking about relationships in term of "financally investing into the other", that relationship has already gone to shit. You buy gifts to the other person because you love them and want to make them happy by giving them stuff they like to have or use.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/21 07:49 PM
3

Without reading thrpugh the whole thing (don't have a lot of time rn) - if the first one is rape+made to penetrate for men, and the second one is only made to penetrate, maybe the difference is something like anal rape with objects, etc.? EDIT: apparently not
/r/MensRights24/03/21 09:31 AM
1

Just like why the nazis hated the jews - they have been in control (of money) for so long! edit: I shouldn't have to state this, but of course rhese are not my views, just taking the analogy further.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:22 AM
2

What the fuck, r/MensRights? You say "we want the government out of our relationships", then go on and say adultery should be a criminal offense, then downvote the guy who says "yeah, maybe that'snot the way"? This makes as much sense as the ACAB people wanting to dismantle police then turning around and wanting to get people arrested for mean words.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:18 AM
2

I'll try instead: no, a contract is void if it would take illegal activity to fulfill it.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 04:09 AM
2

He is describing how it's viewed by these hypocrites, not his own beliefs.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 07:57 PM
4

Up you go.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 08:21 PM
1

IoT is short for "internet of things" - a collection of different devices that are not traditional network devices (personal computers, servers, routers, etc.) but more single purpose devices (lamps, blenders, fridges, speakers, butt plugs, doors, shoes, and a million devices in categories like household appliances, gardening, sex toys, entertainment, clothing, ...) that are "smart" and can function based on data or orders collected from the network. These devices are notoriously bad with securi…
/r/MensRights10/10/20 06:43 AM
12

I mean nowadays chastity belts are sex toys, it's not the dark ages anymore that people lock up their spouses while they go on a crusade. Thwy are used with consent. That being said, people who use IoT sex toys are idiots.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 05:47 PM
-1

I don't know why you are downvoted. Regardless of whether it's true or not, it should be determined by the police, not lynching.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:19 PM
2

My comment was about how that is - while true - conepletely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 05:31 AM
1

This could be done with the red shirt guy cannot decide which button to press template or the guy looking at two directions at a time template.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 05:22 AM
3

Let's just ignore victims just because there are ways to catehorise them into the same category as the perpetrator. I hope you keep this up when you get stabbed by someone the same sex as you, or IDK, from the same country, or the same height.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:39 PM
1

True.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 10:10 PM
1

While as a group we are only an advocate for men's rights, as people nothing stops us from joining both groups.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 09:45 AM
7

Not exactly. The argument is about the right to bodily autonomy, but that right is generally suspended in the case of immediate threats to life if the patient cannot consent. Even if circumcision was "useful" (for example if it had provided 100% protection against stds) I would be against infant circumcision as the danger of not getting one wasn't an immediate life threatening problem.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:53 AM
8

Having an actual life threatening disease is a bit dufferent than chopping off body parts because why not.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:35 AM
6

This is why people need guns. So they can shoot whoever comes to "collect" them for such things if they ever get passed. EDIT: I'm normally against violence and kinda ambivalent on gun control, but if someone comes for my dick, they are gonna have a bad time.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:42 PM
3

I mean they shouldn't ban books. What's next, burn the remaining copies?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:32 PM
7

I'm sorry you see it this way.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:30 PM
15

Ah yes, deny the right to bodily autonomy of infant boys because a mad man 80 years ago denied jews' right to live. Two wrongs sure fucking make a right.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 06:28 PM
1

"Wrong."
/r/MensRights02/09/20 02:50 AM
2

🤢🤮
/r/MensRights27/08/20 04:20 PM
3

This phenomenon even has a name, "redpill rage" - when you get redpilled and you are raging that no one else can see the - now seemingly obvious - truth.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 05:44 AM
1

No link but IIRC it has some efficiency in protecting the wearer, just very low compared to protecting those around the wearer (like a few percents lower chance of getting infected)
/r/MensRights26/08/20 12:59 PM
1

How is he upvoted and ypu downvoted?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 10:54 AM
24

An iron will and/or the knowledge that even looking like that if ypu hit her you got a chance of going to jail.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 03:42 PM
1

Ho-dor rape?
/r/MensRights24/08/20 05:47 AM
2

You misunderstood them. "Women need men like a fish needs a bicycle" is a famous feminist "saying". The person who replied to you was probably trying to say somethig along the lines of "it should also be this way when they need help".
/r/MensRights24/08/20 05:46 AM
13

That accound is comrade Jordan, a known satire account.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 02:49 PM
1

You are aware that this isn't a literal "I wILl nEveR HIrE WoMEn" but saying that the very thing meant to get women more educated will make people doubt thatbthey actually are, right?
/r/MensRights18/08/20 01:16 PM
1

Yeah in that case it's stupid.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 10:09 AM
1

So if a man does something you find deplorable, you start hating men, not that one man? Interesting.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 08:38 AM
1

Back when atheist youtube was a big thing I followed people like The Armoured Skeptic, Shoeonhead, Sargon of Akkad, Computing Forever, Sir Sic, The amazing atheist, etc. Some time after part of the atheist movement got woke (atheism+) bringing the topic of feminism into the debates they had, I took the side of the anti-feminists. At the time I didn't know about men's rights. It took another notch with gamergate to discover this subreddit - this was when I discovered the KiA and TiA subreddits, a…
/r/MensRights15/08/20 08:34 AM
1

Depends on what she was making. If the first forks touched raw meat or eggs, it isn't very wose to use them again on other things, but otherwise it should be fine.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 06:27 AM
0

Not neccessarily. Have you ever heard of steelmanning?
/r/MensRights14/08/20 02:01 PM
1

When something really bother me or fucks me up, I won't start yelling and crying. I'll go to the garden or the garage and start working on something. In the meantime I will process my feelings.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 05:44 AM
0

Exactly. Freedom of association comes to your aid. FDS shouldn't be banned, and neither should any other "hateful" subreddit. I thought "I don't want to see it, so ban it" was not our tactic.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 05:23 AM
1

r/mensrightslinks r/mensrightsscience Also you can search this subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 05:10 AM
0

On average, women have more mental problems, but considering the male/female suicide rate, I would guess male mental problems tend to be more serious.
/r/MensRights10/08/20 05:26 AM
7

While most women may not be attracted to other women sexually, they still enjoy the aesthetics of the female body. The same cannot be said about men.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 05:22 AM
2

rambles about sex based in-group preferences
/r/MensRights07/08/20 11:32 AM
9

most men present with a victim mindset Wow, better than an IMAX.
/r/MensRights06/08/20 05:31 AM
3

Reality: *writes "cereal" on the shopping list* *goes on with life*
/r/MensRights05/08/20 08:13 AM
3

Of course they are disappointed. Also, only 23% think that it is not more dangerous to be a woman in society than it is to be a man? I think they need to take a harder look at the statistics on the demographics of violent crime victims (IIRC ~80% male), and look around to see safety nets set up for people who need it.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:55 AM
3

What would we do? Giving wrong advice could be actually harmful in an abusive situation, but I can imagine collecting helplines that actually help men collecting good advice starting a help group (or groups)
/r/MensRights03/08/20 08:35 PM
1

If you give permission, I will crosspost this to r/MensRightsScience.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 11:02 PM
1

Actually, you make a very good point. While it is too much as a punishment, in her position this is the logical way of protecting her daughter.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 04:05 PM
7

What the actual fuck? Did those doctors purchase their license at a dollar store?
/r/MensRights22/07/20 03:09 PM
5

Be the change you want to see in the world! If you create the sub and need help modding, PM me.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 03:05 PM
3

Makes sense. I have a strong suspicion that this is because less women work than men. If you correct this data for the total earnings of men and women, you should get the same (tax paid/pound earned) value for both men and women - unless women get special tax exemptions.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 03:03 PM
16

I can somewhat understand* not sterilising young people, but needing someone else's permission? That's bullshit. *: even then if someone wants kids later, just adopt. There are so many kids without homes. And wanting kids is not always the issue, some people have health issues that would be helped by a vasectomy/laparoscopy. EDIT: laparoscopy, not hysterectomy, as pointed out by a kind redditor.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 02:19 PM
7

If he raped his own daughter, I have no sympathy for him, even if he didn't deserve a punishment this harsh. No one does, no matter what they do. On the other hand, these occurrences set up a precedent of "I can set anyone on fire as long as I can convince a jury that they were guilty of some horrible crime".
/r/MensRights22/07/20 02:04 PM
2

I don't know the exact names but there are egalitarian subs.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 09:56 AM
12

IMO a sperm donor shouldn't have any parental rights but also shouldn't have to pay CS.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 01:21 PM
3

The dragon girl (Licia Troisi) [3 book series] Library of the dead; Book of souls (Glenn Cooper) [connected books, don't know if they are in a series] The painted man (US title: The warded man) (Peter V. Brett) [5 book cycle plus novels] Fairy Oak (Elisabetta Gnome) [3 core books plus 3 "additional stories" books, a bit for kids] Blood of Elves (Andrzej Sapkowski) - the book series the Witcher games are based upon Most of these fit in the fantasy genre. EDIT: except for Blood of Elves and The Pa…
/r/MensRights18/07/20 10:21 AM
0

Counterpoint: it would be a better option if we stopped spreading the pictures of male perpetrators and/or accused.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/07/20 05:38 PM
1

Your sister is fucked up and should be behind bars for a long long time, but at least she has the integrity and honesty to try to be held accountable after her crime. Inb4 I'm called a simp, I think integrity and honesty is an honorable trait in anyone, and can occur regardless of how shit they are otherwise or what is between their legs.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 05:25 PM
2

You gotta pump those numbers up!
/r/MensRights17/07/20 05:15 PM
19

men look for That's a weird way to spell "rapists". Thanks but just having a dick doesn't make me a rapist.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 05:02 PM
2

Mainstream feminist organisations in the west like to derail attempts at making things fair to men in the areas of mental health funding, general medical funding, being taken seriously when they are victims of domestic violence or sexual assault, etc. It's 2:30AM here so I won't search links now, but I can get back to it tomorrow if you want to read something, or you can just google these incidents or browse a collection of them like here on r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 12:34 AM
9

On paper, yes. But mostly only on paper.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 08:03 PM
8

It sounds sarcastic to me.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 07:58 PM
24

The stereotype for men is that they always want sex, which causes a lot of disbelief when it comes to male rape victims, and for women that they never do, they are just "giving it" to the man in their lives, making women who like sex judged as sluts. The opposite stereotypes don't really exist, or at least aren't widespread, so they aren't worth mentioning.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 07:51 PM
2

Exactly, this is just the good ole' female ex= soulless, male ex = microdick joke, we shouldn't get upset over it.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 01:56 PM
11

Yeah, not using the word itself in a definition is dictionary making 101. Something like "Rapist: a person who forces unwanted sexual intercourse on another person." would be much more descriptive, neutral, and clear.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 09:32 AM
3

I care, too. Now there is three of us.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 09:21 AM
2

r/MRAmemes
/r/MensRights14/07/20 09:13 AM
4

Yes they do, but I guess you also aren't a screeching "abolish the police" type, you just want them not to randomly shoot people and dogs.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 06:27 AM
82

I... don't think those are the same group of people.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 03:19 PM
1

Instead of reading about it in places where they just try to shove neomarxism down your throat, just look into yourself and find out the root causes. If you find out why you are sexist, it will become much easier not to be sexist. Is it because of bad experiences? Is it because of what's the general belief in your family/town/workplace/etc. and it got to you? Is it something else? If you have found it, use it to destroy your biases. If you are sexist because you had experiences with some very du…
/r/MensRights05/07/20 09:04 PM
3

Guys, we may have found Cathy Newman's account.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 10:44 AM
16

Sorry, I stopped reading when he mentioned how the health benefits of it outweigh the risks.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 10:27 AM
2

Of course it isn't a single man decision, but it's still very few people compared to how many it affects.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 09:48 AM
2

Actually, there are two reasons I want to uphold the principle of free speech, and they are very tightly connected. Firstly I believe the best way to weed out bad ideas and propagate good ideas is to show all of them to the people and let them decide using their right to freedom of association. Secondly it is very dangerous to let a few people decide whether whether your speech is acceptable or not, because there is nothing to guarantee that the people wielding the banhammer aren't the bad ones …
/r/MensRights03/07/20 07:45 AM
1

I don't consider the impact of them being hosted or not on the environment here. My objections to the ban are purely based on principle.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 10:05 PM
11

However strongly I disagree with them, I also have to disagree with the banning of subreddits for """hate speech""".
/r/MensRights02/07/20 12:45 PM
2

At 12 years I doubt your penis is even physically capable of anally penetrating someone.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:35 AM
1

Oh, I remember reading this, it was a great read and makes sense.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:03 AM
2

Happy cake day!
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:02 AM
4

I don't know about the specific situation, but take into consideration that "my abuser" is significantly shorter than "the person/man/woman/etc. who abused me", and thus most people will choose to type the former out. Also I suppose this is on twitter, the people there already aren't famous of writing essay length posts, everything has to fit in very few characters.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:01 AM
78

I mean... we have always been complaining about why women don't take up mining instead of office work /s
/r/MensRights02/07/20 04:53 AM
13

perform constant emotional labor You misspelled "care about".
/r/MensRights27/06/20 08:19 PM
6

Where is he wrong? He explained why traditional gender roles worked in the past, not advocating for them in the present.
/r/MensRights27/06/20 09:31 AM
3

Positive discrimination for X is jut negative discrimination against not(X).
/r/MensRights26/06/20 05:43 PM
3

I'm one of them. Will contact them about it.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 10:23 PM
24

What the fuck? I think you need to rename those "ethical regulations" to "regulations".
/r/MensRights13/06/20 09:55 PM
9

Yeah, sorry, this is BS. Genital cutting being the same as transgenderism? Slutshaming? No thank you.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 12:36 PM
1

Which is VERY BAD for defence against diseases.
/r/MensRights02/06/20 09:48 AM
1

How much older? 19? 25? 38? Legally, probably all of them unless the age of consent in your country is 17 or lower, but I wouldn't say there is any moral problem with a 19yo and a 17yo having sex.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 07:27 AM
1

Did you do it?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 01:42 PM
3

Ah yes, last Tuesday I died of covid because my gf asked me to take the trash out.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 10:46 AM
3

Out of the 7 books where the author can be seen in the picture, 6 are written by women.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 02:09 PM
18

It's good to hear that there is a steady (however unfortunately slow) decline in circumcisions in the US in the last decades.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 01:47 PM
2

First I thought it's because they don't call everyone in to avoid a crowded workspace but then I remembered reviewing is a job you can do from home. EDIT: grammar
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:49 PM
19

Counterpoint: in internet debates, it's not your debate partner who you need to convince, it's those who read it later. If you have points that are stronger than your opponent's points, you lay them out for others to consider, and maybe you convince many people with your effort.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:00 PM
5

A true classic.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 11:23 AM
2

He essentially wants to make feminists argue against rape culture.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 06:55 PM
3

Others are suggesting to hit back. Before you do this, take into consideration how your parents would react in the situation of you hitting her (not hitting back, just hitting - it's very much possible that they treat it as if you were the aggressor).
/r/MensRights11/05/20 06:52 PM
1

I don't know how many people here are from there, but maybe you could get better advice in a ny specific subreddit?
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:45 AM
1

I mean at least now you know what to do. But I guess the "learning money" wasn't worth that.
/r/MensRights05/05/20 10:39 AM
6

Holy shit... and the kids are STILL WITH HER???
/r/MensRights11/04/20 09:25 AM
5

Paying for that "unpaid work" is a terrible idea for one reason - that work is already paid for, just not in money. The reason you get a salary for your job is because you made your employer's life easier better. You made a thing for them, so they now have the thing and didn't have to work for it. This thing can be material (like you make sandwiches which they can later eat or sell) or not (if you are a babysitter you made their lives easier by not having to always look after their child, if you…
/r/MensRights03/04/20 11:46 PM
19

"You are in a shit situation, let's make it even shitter"
/r/MensRights30/03/20 12:29 PM
2

I hate that PBS is like that because I really like their youtube channels PBS Spacetime and PBS Eons, while the main thing is... no, just no.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 10:48 AM
2

it is so hard to disprove Thank god we don't have to disprove crimes, rather we have to prove them, exactly to avoid putting innocent people in jail... Wait, no, that's only all other crimes, rape is different, women wouldn't lie.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 12:59 PM
2

Black pill is basically giving up hope on any issue, be that women, men, humans, or society.q
/r/MensRights17/03/20 06:33 PM
1

Don't do this again. No matter the fuss she makes, when you try to avoid conflict by doing what she wants, you risk your parents' life. You don't want that, do you?
/r/MensRights16/03/20 06:51 AM
1

I think u/zogins tried to say that the mother would accuse the boy of forcing her, not the girlfriend.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 06:49 AM
1

I've always supported my girlfriend's efforts to look pretty, but tbh it's her that matter most to me in looks, not what she wraps herself into.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 06:09 AM
31

A loli is an underage anime girl and a shota is an underage anime boy. I don't know for sure but a lolicon/shotacon is either the anime that has them, or the person who likes them. Also I think the "likes them" part doesn't need to be sexual.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 08:54 AM
18

Ah yes, the wonders of #believewomen. I will never understand the "why would she lie" argument. For plenty of reason. Maybe she hates you and wants to hurt you. Maybe you did something she didn't like (hmm, he took the last chocolate in the shop before me, let's ruin his life) and gets at you this way. Maybe she is just a psychopath who loves to see it. Yes, most women, like most men, are ok, but some are just trash.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 10:39 AM
6

Look up that thread here from a few days ago when a guy got really drunk then his girlfriend and her friends bathed him against his will.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 07:41 AM
1

it's against MEN And even that is only because they tried to "correct" a non-existing wage gap in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 09:44 AM
2

r/nottheonion
/r/MensRights06/03/20 09:42 AM
1

The right to leave the military without even consenting to be there in the first place? (once an age is reached, probably different everywhere)
/r/MensRights06/03/20 09:39 AM
1

Do they have some degree of personal responsibility? Yes. Even from as little as going through a bad neighborhood at night instead of taking the longer but safer route through the neighborhood with little crime (note, this also applies to me if I get stabbed in that same bad neighborhood) to as much as relentlessly teasing men with their sexuality to get drinks. Were they "asking for it"? No. If I get stabbed in that bad part of the city, police is still going to look for the stabber, not take m…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 09:18 AM
5

Ah yes, the good ole' "causation or correlation" thing. All of those terrorists probably also used facebook, but that doesn't mean we should get rid of it in the fight against terrorism.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:34 AM
1

I know you are just here to stir shit, but a) your penis isn't representative of all penises b) anal penetration with objects still exists even if all of them worked like yours.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 10:06 PM
2

A penis can get hard regardless of emotional state, often it only needs physical stimulation. I cannot count the times my girlfriend asked me some version of "why are you hard" and I had to reply "no idea, it has a mind of its own, maybe my pants rubbed against it".
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:48 PM
2

This is hilarious, but where do I shit then? Bring the stolen seat with me?
/r/MensRights29/02/20 04:52 PM
1

No, it's actually the absence of fathers that does that. A child needs a father figure in their lives, and a father isn't present, they'll find another person, maybe a not so good one. What causes the absence of fathers is another issue.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:58 PM
4

I fail to see how is this relevant. If our goal was for society and law to take male victims instead of female victims seriously, this would be a good statistic to prove that would not be a net positive. But our goal is to take both of them seriously.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:47 PM
39

Overton Hmm... 5 years in jail for lying about rape Yeah, there must be a joke in here about windows shifting away from #BelieveWomen.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 12:40 PM
5

This shouldn't be accepted as an excuse for the same reason manslaughter as a crime exists - not having control over the actions (accident or overwhelming feelings) doesn't erase the consequences.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 09:31 AM
2

One question, what the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights27/02/20 09:18 AM
1

In this case the best you can do is listen to people, and maybe if you have some input on what activities to organise, do some that's also appealing for men.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 07:54 AM
1

What are your tasks in this position?
/r/MensRights25/02/20 06:38 AM
15

The relationship between raping and watching that extreme porn could as easily be "sick mind -> porn, rape" as "porn -> sick mind -> rape".
/r/MensRights24/02/20 12:50 PM
3

If you can't find it on YouTube, maybe try bitchute. They don't delete or hide content as easily.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:52 AM
6

There might be your answer - as a child, structure is important. If everything is permitted, it's no problem, if there are rules that restrict you, also no problem as long as they aren't suffocatingly strict. But if you don't know what causes a "lash out", you live in fear that you break a rule you can't clearly see.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:52 AM
3

"Example 1: wikipedia dismissing a male issue on the basis that it's not 'notable'".
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:48 AM
2

My wife has a good heart [X] Doubt Seriously though, what kind of psychopath destroys your life (and not just with one not-thought-through action, but continually for years) because she forgot that instead of you going to her parents, her parents were going to come to you? I hope the best to you in life.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:45 AM
2

Unfortunately I can't answer your question, but I hope you solve this soon. Does she know how you felt? Does she remember the night?
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:19 AM
8

Well, men's and women's bodies need a slightly different configuration of vitamins to function well, so it's entirely possible that this isn't "muh women get extra health".
/r/MensRights20/02/20 09:35 AM
1

I'm not sure you'll find a lawyer in that area here, what are the chances that from the people visiting this sub some of them fit both criteria? Maybe you'll get better luck with the local subreddit.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 07:37 AM
8

I haven't jumped to any conclusions, I just expressed my views on the topic, namely "when deciding to cut off parts of a body, we shouldn't set up a pro/con table, we should default to not cutting - and doing it only if absolutely necessary.". But since you are curious about pros and cons: pros: you are much more sensitive, the head of your penis remains moist (as opposed to drying out and starting to keratinise) cons: you need to pull the skin back and wash the part under your skin once a day, …
/r/MensRights17/02/20 11:33 AM
3

Yes, the intention for women's suicide attempts is often a cry for help, while men mostly only do it if they are already over that stage or don't believe they would get any help.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 08:17 AM
11

What's the purpose of your little finger? Pros and cons please.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 08:14 AM
2

More would be done if 71 percent of of those affected were female. Probably true.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:02 PM
1

This is exactly how laws work in your country, as well. Well, yes, this is true.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:00 PM
2

Sadly you are probably right.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 09:25 AM
1

Yeah, except the ones who don't and are still forced to obey it (this statement applies for men, too). But you are right, most of them probably do.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 09:24 AM
4

Small steps. Small steps.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:19 PM
2

Calm down, noone is letting a virus spread because it affects more males. Even if these results are because it actually infects males easier, not just because there is a smaller female population in China (IIRC close-ish to 60-40), That's still millions of women affected if they just let it spread without any brakes.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:19 PM
2

It's good to be reminded sometimes that women's rights movement would not be as useless everywhere as in the west.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:12 PM
16

When fighting an internet argument, convincing the other party is less of a concern - you need to seem like the better person to side with for bystanders. So your technique of polite engagement (I suspect with specific examples of where men lack rights) while they turn to insults is actually very helpful.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:10 PM
5

It's still better to risk failing at a new subreddit than to risk this one.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:04 PM
2

Respect.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 10:28 AM
4

Yeah, if we did this we would need a separate subreddit, like idk, r/AskMensRights.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 06:20 AM
5

Try contacting the moderators that the bot was wrong.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 11:22 AM
3

Why not both?
/r/MensRights11/02/20 07:01 PM
2

Yes, I should have also mentioned the positive reasons.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 06:14 PM
2

I'm not against this idea (sounds like a good equaliser), but I have to bring up a question: IIRC it has been established that hearing the mother's sounds while inside the womb helps strengthen their bond with each other. How would this affect this?
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:48 AM
13

I actually find this very funny. But of course the intentions behind it matter, if they did it because they are annoyed with men being around, it's not so funny...
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:28 AM
2

In this situation I do think you are in the wrong (your explanation probably sounded like you defended the guy), but as general advice: "if you are too fragile to handle opinions without shutting them down with a sexist term, there is no point in continuing to talk".
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:37 PM
2

What he did was immoral, illegal, and cruel. There is no excuse for it, and this subreddit doesn't want to find one. He should be in jail for that.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:53 AM
3

We can't tell you if you were abusive or not in your relationship, but you know your reasons, and you can decide which group it belongs to more: You weren't abusive: I hit him in self defense (note: this means only against physical attacks) I hit him out of frustration that he also hit me I hit him in fights where he always landed the first punch You were abusive: I hit him to get him to do things (eg. take out the trash) I hit him in fights where I landed the first punch I [threw things at him/…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:47 AM
2

Record a short clip, upload it somewhere (youtube), and post the url here on r/mensrights, that's what they mean by linking.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:59 AM
3

Wait, why are they downvoting you? Do they think it's sarcastic?
/r/MensRights09/02/20 07:25 PM
1

If you think "every man is a potential rapist" is bullshit and offensive to normal men, but also think that every woman is a potential false accuser, that makes you a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 07:21 PM
1

You were kind of right tho even if for the wrong reasons - women who take T often stop menstruating after some time.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 02:52 PM
6

I have to disagree - from the way it's written it seems like she blames the existence of "little man syndrome" on the fact that men are given shit for their height (this is irritating and belittling so they try to fight back on it, just like with every other characteristic), not on men inherently having this "fragile ego" feminists talk about. Will edit soon to include the part that makes me believe this. well: Well gee ladies, maybe if you didn't make fun of them for it, maybe they wouldn't be …
/r/MensRights06/02/20 12:40 PM
0

Yeah, good to insert in comments but actually not that good...
/r/MensRights05/02/20 06:24 PM
25

r/feminismstopswhen tires need to be changed and lawns need to be mowed.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 01:46 PM
1

Context? What does it not count in?
/r/MensRights05/02/20 01:36 PM
-1

No, it's an asshole move to destroy resources that would provide for your family down the line. I read the article late night yesterday so correct me if I'm wrong, but we don't get to know anything about his ex wife's intention or character. She may be an evil bitch who deserved this, or she may be actually be normal and this guy is crazy. The only party we definitely get to know as assholes is the judge who casually throws around "yeah, this $2000 a day fine is so you'll have nothing left". Fro…
/r/MensRights05/02/20 08:33 AM
3

As a practical advice, you never mentioned changing passwords after the breakup. Do it. Now.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:39 PM
-6

Court discrimination or not, that's kinda an asshole move.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:33 PM
5

If you don't want her to fall back to this defense, you need to be able to provide examples when she asks this. Not very precise ones (keeping notes of their conversation would actually warrant being wary of you, ngl), but a general "What I'm talking about is that I heard you tell them xyz about not being around me and you look like I killed your family when I'm alone in a room with them.". Also don't bring this up if you recently asked, only if it continues. You can tell her that you asked her …
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:07 PM
14

If that won't cause a decade long family drama, ask the aunt. "Why do you tell your daughters not to be around me? Do you think I'm a pedophile or what?" EDIT: be sure to include that word. "Do you think I'm dangerous?" or some other workaround is WAAAY less effective.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 10:42 PM
10

It was glbt but was later changed to to lgbt. Also this isn't important, it's not an issue.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 07:45 PM
14

Well, but in this case they actually are. EDIT: the comment OP referred to is Mansplaining to me is a buzz word third wave feminists throw around to disregard any valid point a guy brings up. Men can be very condescending to women but women can also be very condescending to men. It isn’t mansplaining or womansplaining, it’s being an asshole and having a holier-than-thou attitude.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 04:54 PM
4

Agreed, the last thing you want to tell a suicidal person is "your pain is irrelevant and we won't listen to you" - and by deleting posts about suicide, you are doing exactly that. That could easily push someone over the edge.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 04:53 PM
2

Oh, I see, thank you.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 04:51 PM
1

Don't frame it as an attack on feminism, frame it as how men are left behind. That way you don't trigger protective instincts on one's accepted worldview, and it will be easier to change some minds.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 02:35 PM
2

r/purplepilldebate is kinda that - not feminist and mra but blue pill and red pill.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:28 PM
1

It shouldn't be a system with two results (either of them go to jail) but with three - if there is enough evidence for one side, one of them goes to jail, and if there isn't, noone does.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:16 PM
3

I have a better idea - if you are not into someone, tell them directly.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:14 PM
4

Non-native speaker here, could you explain to me what a disbarment investigation is?
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:00 PM
2

It helped me become a better man. Reading the conversations and opinions here embedded me stronger in my beliefs about the importance of honesty, strength, moral integrity, and similar values.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 12:26 AM
4

What the actual fuck.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 05:37 PM
12

I'm afraid that I have to inform you it was also buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 05:30 PM
5

Men brutally mutilated shortly after birth, women most affected. Fuck this person. The thing they are trying to achieve is good, but their reasons are abhorrent.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 05:28 PM
3

I don't know what kind of learning disorder you have (and even if I did, it wouldn't help me to answer your question, I'm not am expert), but certain genetic disorders are rarer in women because they have two copies of the X chromosome. This way if one is faulty, they can still function with the other, while men just follow the instructions of the faulty X chromosome. This of course only applies to disorders that are caused by genes on the X chromosome, not on any others.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:32 PM
2

I don't know why, but many women I know consider me a part of their "girlfriend circle" and treat me accordingly - I get to hear about their latest sexual encounters in detail, talking about men like they aren't talking to one right now (not disrespectfully, but rather honestly), or talking about their periods including answering questions about how it works. This atmosphere of "girl club" often goes away when other men join the discussion, so I'm probably more the exception than the rule. My gi…
/r/MensRights31/01/20 10:17 PM
9

I'm opposed to racism but don't support BLM. I'm opposed to sexism but don't support feminism. I'm opposed to fascism but don't support antifa. You get the idea, being against [bad thing] doesn't automatically put you on the side of activists who are in name only are against [bad thing] and are themselves horrible.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 06:00 PM
1

how will a new generation be born into existence? You do know what antinatalism is, right? In short, it won't and they'll be happy with that outcome because that's the whole point.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 01:39 PM
11

The documentary is the Red Pill, and I think you left out Christina Hoff Summers.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 01:20 PM
2

A pet actually sounds a good substitute to a baby.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 10:36 PM
1

Text of original post?
/r/MensRights29/01/20 08:24 AM
1

I'm a bit young to have gone through this, so my advice may be a bit generic, but try to find a way to channel that longing into something. Something related to the baby fever, not just "study hard so you have no time to think about it".
/r/MensRights29/01/20 08:23 AM
23

What the fuck, some people monsters are beyond my understanding.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 09:11 AM
3

Yeah, this seems a non-issue. A bit annoying, but not malicious.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 10:35 PM
1

earned yesterday What happened?
/r/MensRights27/01/20 10:31 PM
5

In a happy relationship (close to 1 year) I got close to men's rights after hearing some (ok, many) cases of how utterly FUBAR and one sided the handling of men are in legal situations, especially those involving women. This includes specific cases (about domestic violence, getting custody of children, and rape accusations), but also generic inequality (like the legality of genital mutilation for boys in the US). On the internet I feel like I don't need to support women's rights because everyone…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 07:15 AM
2

Good, I hope this doesn't stop with this one case and they set up a system there that works. Well, not likely but a man can dream.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 06:50 AM
1

That is correct. It's useless to define dictionary definition feminism, but it's useful to summarize what the movement does.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:04 PM
2

If you are a gay guy, is it misogynistic to not like pussy, or anti-LGBT to choose pussy anyway? disclaimer: I know it doesn't work that way, but in clown world it does. See political lesbians and idiots who claim that gay men disliking pussy is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 02:04 AM
2

Dressing and acting modestly should entirely be dependent upon our agreement with other people on the topic. This agreement can be personal (if my gf doesn't mind that I run around the house all day naked and tells me she doesn't mind, I should be able to do that without any negative effect as long as no one else is present), or guessed by the situation (if I go to a bdsm party, I can guess that leather suits are not considered immodest). If no indication is present about any rule, you should de…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:52 AM
0

The problem is that this won't happen, or if it does, it needs to be maintained artificially. There are some jobs which are naturally paired with certain kinds of people, and IT is one of them. Source: am in IT. Most of the people I know in the field are good people if you get to know them, but their "vibes" scare off others easily.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:27 AM
7

I don't think so. Don't get me wrong, getting comments like these are hurtful, but we often complain about having to walk on eggshells because any stupid comment or mistake could ruin our lives - reporting this would only add to that. I'm not saying that you should just "man up" because having a penis somehow makes you invulnerable to emotions. I'm saying that neither men nor women should be fired for these kind of things, and every time someone decides to be the bigger person and deal with the …
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:21 AM
6

u/NakedValhallaBoy r/rimjob_steve -ception?
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:23 PM
3

C'mon guys, here is a first hand experience and you downvote it because it goes against the narrative... yeah, MGM is horrible, but don't create an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:34 PM
5

Just reading this doubled my heart rate...
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:32 PM
71

🤮🤮🤮🤮 This is disgusting.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:31 AM
1

It is indeed possible that the acts were not of sexual nature (and instead connected to feeding or at least attempting to - I know about women who breastfed or tried to breastfeed their children waaaaayyy too long just like they would an infant), but in this case the father also committed absolutely no crime. Choose one.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:58 PM
2

This can't be real - the guy's name (ostrom) translates to "siege" in my language.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:43 PM
1

What the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:36 PM
1

You either found a troll or the dumbest person alive... My bet is on the first based on some of the responses.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 08:14 PM
16

Of course, we are fairly liberal in who and what we allow to post and comment*. Be warned, this allows you to post, but also allows the less tolerant lurkers here to talk trash about you/your experiences. Personally I like to hear from a wide variety of people - what they experience based on who they are, where they live, etc. * I don't know the mods' official position, just what I experienced here
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:38 AM
4

This may be because a lot of the porn industry is located in Central Europe, where if you seriously suggested MGM, you would be at best laughed at, but probably even hated as a barbaric sociopath.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 08:52 AM
1

By law? Yes, no, no. In reality? No, no, yes.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 08:14 AM
1

What else did they expect him to do? Reporting it to the people who can actually do something about it is exactly what he needs to do in this situation, and he did it.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:40 AM
1

In some places it is illegal to record people without their consent. Look up local laws. EDIT: a comment below states that if you believe the recording will help solve a crime/catch a crime on camera, it's legal.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:31 AM
1

r/teacherswhorape
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:07 AM
2

Thought the same - shitty people are gonna be shitty, but we shouldn't play the victim olympics.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:41 AM
13

Reading the extra material linked by op, it doesn't seem that bad. Yes, they noticed that there are differences in how many male and female fossils are collected, but they don't rush to conclusions. It's just a case of "we noticed this, don't know why that is tho". They even mentioned a hypothesis that males in some species live lives that more often end in a way that's good for fossilisation.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 12:39 AM
3

Well played.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 09:24 AM
8

Yeah, IIRC it changes the brain's reaction to pain and fear (danger), in most cases for the worse. But don't quote me on that second part.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 01:09 AM
0

Yes, you are correct, it's not child porn, it's flashing to a child.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 10:49 AM
2

Yeah, it was stolen and repurposed for putting shit on our name.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 10:48 AM
1

It's correct. Source: I was there when the term was a newborn and just starting to gain traction. The people who invented it thought that inventing a word that sounds like feminist but consists of people that talk baseless hateful shit is both hilarious and might bring some self awareness to extreme feminists. Well, it was hilarious, the other part, not so much...
/r/MensRights25/12/19 01:31 PM
1

The brutality of the punishment doesn't deter from doing the crime. The high chance of getting caught does. This is because criminals think they won't get caught anyways.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 01:25 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 01:16 PM
3

The thing you can do is expose the kafka trap and leave the conversation: "You say that all men are bad, and you say that men who say that not all man are bad are the bad ones. A situation where denying an accusation is taken as evidence of the accusation is called a kafka trap, and it's either a logical error or a deliberate trap designed to be inescapable once the accusation has been made. It's simply incorrect and stupid, I'm not playing your game. Bye." She can still attack, but the normal p…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 01:11 PM
87

How does it work that you are banned for being there but the one who posted basically porn featuring a child isn't banned yet?
/r/MensRights25/12/19 12:51 PM
10

Agreed, don't sink to their level. By their I mean the people who use #menaretrash, not women.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 03:03 PM
5

What should I do with this information?
/r/MensRights24/12/19 01:22 AM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:56 AM
1

a set of global norms that support their view of how the Internet and information should be controlled It shouldn't?
/r/MensRights21/12/19 06:15 PM
2

No, I know the account, it's a troll.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 06:13 PM
1

Would you elaborate on that, or do I just need to accept that I'm stupid without any further explanation?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/19 07:06 PM
1

I may have phrased that incorrectly, I meant that it's good that they need to tell you.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/19 07:04 PM
1

Yeah, my comment really sounded like I support these EU regulations. Needing to tell you what they use your data for is good, but the other parts of this regulation... as you said, impossible.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/19 02:06 PM
14

The kinda site that rather made itself unavailable in the EU than tell you what they use your data for.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/19 12:49 PM
16

Also others that look at this (briefly or not so) the 100 (they live on a space station, overpopulation would simply kill everyone) terra nova (future Earth is an overcrowded shithole, they don't want the population to grow)
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/19 12:43 PM
6

I would indeed say it's petty. The language itself is not any more discriminatory than how it's used. Sorry, I just don't see the problem here.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 05:36 PM
1

Well, it's a whole different question that the market for "boys rule" and similar t-shirts is virtually non-existent because you'd lynched in a week if you wore one, not because no one wants them.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 05:54 AM
3

women's IQ is superior to men's Lol, no. The IQs of men and women are roughly the same on average and they both follow a bell distribution. The difference is only the width of this distribution - men's IQ distribution is wider, which means there are more very smart and very dumb men, while women are closer to the average.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:40 AM
3

Well, she should have definitely told him what happened, and if they were in a relationship, there should have been a discussion before doing anything. But since it's a one night stand, I completely understand the girl's choice (about doing the abortion, not about not telling him).
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:32 AM
1

what is the problem? Probably the search field's contents. But that is also because there isn't a market for that.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:14 AM
15

Wrong thread?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:11 AM
1

He doesn't seem to be the type to accept the invitation, but sure, it doesn't hurt if you are not overly aggressive about it. Just like with any other social interaction.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 09:37 AM
9

I would rather spend 10 seconds every day cleaning it than cut it off, thank you. I'm not saying you are wrong for liking being cut, that's entirely up to you, but I am saying that it should be a decision you make, not your parents.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:42 AM
4

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:28 AM
5

Would you also take this stance if we were talking about cutting one of their fingers off? Because circumcision is definitely closer to cutting a a finger off than it is to immunization or a surgery.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 09:35 AM
4

or held a viewpoint regardless of facts But... she doesn't. She changed her viewpoint when those facts became known to her. u/NonnyNu seems like a good example of someone who is willing to learn when presented with new information - if we did with kids in school what you have done to her now (give them shit for not already knowing things or just admitting that there was a time they didn't know things), none of them would learn anything ever.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 09:13 AM
1

It's comrade jordan, a satire account. This image of his/her post is old af and all over the internet.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 12:04 AM
2

Unluckily this works because not many of us say "ok, no more Gillette products in my life".
/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:37 AM
1

Fuck that - proxy users
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:24 PM
1

You sir are a genius.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 11:09 AM
82

The correct answer to receiving these: 1) smile and thank them 2) while doing 1), rip it to pieces 3) hand it back to them
/r/MensRights24/12/18 01:31 PM
2

I agree with you overall but... a special term? Like "gang rape"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 05:54 AM
2

It's definitely a troll, don't engage with him.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 10:37 AM
22

"world ends, women most effected"
/r/MensRights07/12/18 10:26 AM
1

You failed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/18 12:43 AM
20

I hope it wasn't just in the past.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/18 06:36 PM
28

Pro tip: to include characters that reddit normally uses for formatting, you need to eacape them with the \ character. If you write this: #metoo, you get metoo To get it without big letters and the sign included, write: \#metoo.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/18 06:23 AM
33

I guess you consider yourself not "Straw People", so what specific positions of the MRM do you disagree with and why? Since you are here you probably know more about the MRM than most people, so I expect you to actually be able to answer this question coherently - since no movement is perfect.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 10:33 AM
16

While that's true, they can go ahead and start not giving a shit about negative comments about wearing the same dress twice. They just choose not to. That's hardly oppression. If other women lynched them of physically threatened them I would understand the problem, I currently don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/18 06:23 AM
27

Exactly - in most things I tend to avoid sweeping statements and speak in "ususally"-s and "generally"-s but I doubt there is a single straight man on the face of Earth who gives a fuck if a woman wears the same dress twice.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/18 06:19 AM
6

Now I'm imagining this read by google translator, the lines slowly being cropped in as they are said.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/18 09:23 AM
30

If you read it as if it was French, you get a phonetical "hoe".
/r/PussyPassDenied31/10/18 09:20 AM
1

I feel the same way, it's a good enough compromise in an otherwise inherently unfair situation.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 01:16 PM
10

Agreed, this is good for some meme subreddits but mensrights is a bit more serious.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 07:26 PM
2

Then I apologize, disregard my comment.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 07:50 AM
3

Nah, they would just find a way to somehow not think about the inconsistency. But this idea is definitely an endless salt mine, it has power like few others have.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/18 12:21 AM
8

I don't know where you got the idea that I think toxic masculinity means that all masculinity is toxic (maybe I was a bit unclear with my language usage somewhere?), but I guess that second part makes sense and helps me understand this kind of thing a bit better.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 07:49 PM
30

The question is... if this is what's called toxic masculinity, why does it label the "masculinity" toxic when it's the people laughing that are toxic. No one calls it toxic feminity when a woman hides her emotions for fear of a reaction to it, they call it abuse towards the woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 06:01 PM
2

Well said. Also ironically he said that "posting there" should get people banned, which is (besides it's very existence) the biggest problem with the existing system of "if you post in r/X you get banned from r/Y" simply because it doesn't look at content, only place. I could post in an alt-right sub saying everything they believe in is wrong and they are just a hateful bunch of sad losers and it would still get me banned from those other subs for being alt-right. Besides, that won't lead to a d…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 08:20 AM
1

It doesn't matter what you comment, it's done by a bot and it doesn't look at the content, just collects username-who-interacted/subreddit pairs.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 08:10 AM
1

If by "like him" you mean me, congratulations, well done. I have never posted in, commented in, or been subscribed to billionshekelsupreme, and I disliked them in just about every way possible - I just brought it up as an extreme example. By "wrongthink subreddit", when not talking about the extremes, I meant places like r/TumblrInAction or - surprise - r/Mensrights. But you decided I am unreasonable because I merely mentioned a place. Good job.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 08:07 AM
11

If you post in certain wrongthink subreddits you'll get banned from twoX, r/offmychest, etc. I think posting in r/billionshekelsupreme (don't bother with the link, sub is banned) got you banned from 20+ subreddits.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 12:01 AM
2

Probably the difference between me and hardcore redpillers is that I understand that how I do it is not the normal way, I'm just stuck with it, whereas they treat it as the norm and the intuitive way as some deviation. But you are probably right that they are also people who are stuck with it ("Aspies") and not as I thought previously that they choose it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 06:20 PM
2

I always try to be understanding of how others perceive the world, but it's sometimes hard to do so and I come off as rude. I brought up engineering and such as examples of areas where "left brain thinking" could be useful (as opposed to social areas where it isn't), not as any kind of proof for superiority or other nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/18 06:16 PM
12

Hmm... interesting train of thought. As someone who is in this position not because of some colored metaphorical pill but an actual thing and since birth (slight autism, I have high IQ but very low EQ) I understand why someone would like to have these qualities in engineering or programming for example, but have no idea why they would want to apply them to social interactions. My situation causes me to navigate the world in an almost exclusively red pill way, meaning I have to consciously learn …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/18 09:25 PM
12

Already there.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 03:01 PM
1

Are you sure you aren't gay? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/18 05:20 PM
5

For a moment I thought I would have to dumb bitbucket but thankfully that's not the case it seems.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:49 PM
2

the universe collapses from paradox
/r/MensRights02/10/18 09:44 PM
10

with a boulder of rock salt I'm stealing this.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 09:43 PM
2

Viewed from your angle, I think it ultimately comes down to subjective opinion, namely being able to do what you like without much effort is privilege, being expected to do what you don't like is responsibility. For the shopping example, if you like shopping, it doesn't feel like work - so getting money to do it, having the say in what to buy, etc. is a privilege. If you hate shopping, it becomes a responsibility only. Notice that I used "being able to without much effort" and "being expected", …
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:26 PM
1

Good point, maybe I should be skeptical of what he said.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 08:14 AM
20

I would like to add that "taken seriously" should mean "investigate it properly" not "drag the accused through the court of public opinion's 'process' for destroying reputations forever".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 11:03 PM
1

racking their brains to remember if they have ever been raped WHAT THE FUCK? If they have been, they would remember it pretty clearly, given it wasn't by party drugs.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:21 PM
1

As under other posts about the quarantining of those subs, I suggest creating a group on minds.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:43 PM
6

Menslib is IMO just feminism in the disguise of wanting to help men, TRP is the opposite, it's kinda incelish. I found that r/mensrights is a good middle ground in the stricter subject, and broadly here at PPD is the real thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/18 09:01 PM
30

They say we are the hateful ones, we say they are, but the reality is that both camps contain bad apples. How many, that's another question.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:17 PM
3

They say we are the hateful ones, we say they are, but the reality is that both camps contain bad apples. How many, that's another question.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:16 PM
1

Well, that's just interacting with anonymous people, they are really mean when you have a dumb moment. Or really any moment.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/18 08:44 PM
5

Oh I see now. Didn't get past the "I should be let to the front of the line" part the first time.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/18 10:28 AM
4

r/oddlyspecific Seriously, why 22? EDIT: no need for any more downvotes, I found out why 22 after reading the post again.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/18 06:44 AM
8

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?!
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:29 PM
7

This this this
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:19 PM
5

sanity sunday TiA post?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 03:51 PM
3

Yes, but I didn't bring up the likelihood of something like that happening, as someone who lives in constant fear (person I replied to) of being beat up or raped by a random guy clearly isn't interested in that, so instead I just pointed out that just because it can happen you can still live a life not full of fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/18 04:24 PM
5

As someone who lives very near to an area where, let's just say, there are many people who like to earn their money with knives and threats, and most of the time the people who do this can be visually identified (eg any one of them could make today my worst day and probably the last one) I still don't understand how someone can live like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/18 05:08 AM
7

and I know I'm not a man Don't worry about that. Ironically the men's rights subreddit is one of the few places on the internet where people won't look at your gender if you want to participate. We welcome everyone who is not an unhinged misandryst or misogynist (other horrible character traits usually don't come to view here so we assume you are decent in what we don't see), and you don't seem to be one.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 10:11 PM
1

r/twentycharacterlimit
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/18 08:14 AM
9

Just a point to add, men's rights and the red pill are not the same thing, in fact it's an often used tactic against us the conflate us with TRP or MGTOW.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:14 PM
69

I would like to add a bit of nuance here, there is a bit of a difference between "manage my subreddit however I like" and "make reddit ban subreddits I don't like". Now I don't know if the banout was serious but I got the impression it is, in which case it falls in the latter category, which in my eyes isn't ok.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 12:36 PM
20

r/BoneAppleTea
/r/PussyPassDenied13/09/18 05:43 PM
7

Not only that, but "if we later find out you were innocent, jail time is reversible (you can't get your years back but you can be let out), execution is not" is the main reason against execution for crimes - and this person is advocating for execution for one of the hardest to prove beyond a reasonable doubt crimes.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 11:12 AM
10

Wow, I didn't even think of this, I have just witnessed the first 4D chess move of my life live.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/18 07:19 PM
2

*whomst've'd'ved
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/18 07:07 PM
14

I don't think it's contradicting, it's basically saying "yes, everyone has it hard, but men have it harder than women, so you are stupid if you want it like men". A "comparatively easy" life can still be hard if it's compared to an even harder one.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:15 PM
-17

If not done, put me in the screenshot.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/18 06:38 AM
-14

Wait, this is mensrights? From the post I thought I was on r/TumblrInAction. This doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:12 PM
29

I think the point of the guy is exactly "see, many of you simply aren't interested, it's not sexism".
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/18 02:01 PM
2

TBH I would rather want to know if I had cancer than live in the dark about it.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:54 PM
2

I sense a /s in that comment, it uses similar tactics as texts explaining away woman predators' responsibility.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 11:38 PM
1

Have only seen it in news articles, not from actual people talking to each other - maybe I should have clarified that I was only talking about news.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/18 02:35 PM
2

Depends. Do you live in Britain? I've heard sexually assaulting girls is often referred to as grooming there.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/09/18 03:02 AM
1

I think there is also a white pill, which is kinda like red pill with a positive attitude, thinks that the things realized by red pill are problems that can be fixed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/18 09:48 PM
2

Yeah, they can fuck off with that shit. Freedom of association is a thing and the government shouldn't intervene in who a company hires, trades with, makes a part of their leading board etc.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 03:15 PM
-3

This
/r/MensRights02/09/18 03:05 PM
16

Exactly, that kinda means "women are most attractive to their age group when that group is around 22 and men are most attractive to their age group when they are around 35". I don't know how accurate that is, but it definitely does not mean "22 year old women are attracted to 35 year old men".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/18 07:56 AM
1

I have never had any apple products in my life, so I wouldn't know, but I heard they are decent on terms of how well it works. When people want to leave Google, it's mostly because of either spying, their (Google's) political views. When people want to leave Apple, it's mostly because of their not really consumer friendly business practices. So I guess it depends on what you want to avoid and what you are ok with. I would say since Apple's business model depends on selling hardware, not data (yo…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/18 07:36 AM
10

r/degoogleyourlife
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/18 07:34 AM
13

Thanks, now I have to clean up my puke.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 08:02 PM
18

The most disturbing thing about this is that they treat him worse for allegations than they would treat convicted murderers...
/r/MensRights28/08/18 08:00 PM
3

This is disgusting.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:40 PM
1

Yeah, your average russian totally wants nothing else than destroying the world, it's not just the powerful players who do dumb shit for even more power that could lead to that /s
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/18 02:57 AM
5

Really simple. Religious rights don't override the right to bodily autonomy. Full stop. If they try to argue that it does, say you belong to a religion which requires you to cut the left arm of pro-circumcision people off. If they say they don't believe that, say you don't believe they are jewish. EDIT: this might seem harsh, but as an owner of a dick, I would rather have my left arm cut off than let anyone cut my dick. Hell, I would rather go down bringing as many with me as I can if I encounte…
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:13 AM
-1

Calm down man, noone here seems to want to ban the play, and I hope it stays that way.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:06 AM
14

It's a little bit ironic to paint a peace sign next to a beheaded body.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:38 AM
27

This is not r/CrappyDesign, that would imply lack of intentionality, this is r/Agenda_Design.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:36 AM
-1

^^^^ This. We should stay to advocating men's rights, not raging over nontroversies and tearing down feminists or just even women in general in some cases - let's not sink to their level.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:09 PM
13

...security? If someone says things like that (men's center should be focused on SJ and stamping out "toxic masculinity", she should be kindly escorted out and never be allowed into the building/room/(whatever size HQ the men's center has) ever again. Unfortunately we collectively lack the balls to do that.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:12 PM
6

It isn't, this is more of a material for r/KotakuInAction.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:09 PM
16

If a group of people tried to forcibly circumcise me, I would make sure to take as many down with me as I can before they are forced to kill me instead or give it up.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:41 PM
6

People can belong to multiple categories. For example you could run away, cry, and call the police.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 12:23 PM
-11

"heightism" doesn't exist. People are allowed to be attracted to whoever they are attracted to.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:02 PM
2

Feminism doesn't have a monopoly at equality of the sexes.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/08/18 09:46 PM
2

Yes, unfortunately there are taboo topics you can't touch without being shamed for it, even if your intentions are good and you just want to explain, not support.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:33 PM
3

This a thousand times. Once I mentioned either here or on r/badwomensanatomy (don't remember which) that ephebophilia (attraction to teens who are already past pubescence, roughly 14-19) is in fact very common despite not meeting most people's (including me if the age difference is bigger than 3-4 years, 2 on the lower end) moral standards, and got downvoted to oblivion and got called a pedophile.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 04:18 PM
19

You have to be a special combination of rich, toxic, and vain to be like that. EDIT: I mean to criticize people for wearing the same dress twice, not to make this comment. Your comment is perfectly sensible.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 12:17 AM
2

That's interesting considering that without fail, every single woman I know at uni stresses more about exams than I do. Is that toxic masculinity?
/r/MensRights12/08/18 12:15 AM
8

But didn't you know that diversity of thought is white supremacist? /s no really, some people actually believe that
/r/MensRights12/08/18 12:11 AM
1

None of them, just like AJ shouldn't have been.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:23 AM
2

When I see an onion article posted here for a moment I always fear OP took it seriously, then I realise it's just that thr onion has predicted the future again.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:09 AM
2

If those activities are harmful to the development of the brain when they do it with an 18-40 year old, the it's GOT to be harmful with someone their own age as well Wrong, the harmfulness comes from having sex while not really wanting to have sex, not from being 15 - children (by which I generally mean under 18, not "after infancy up to puberty" as the parents of people under 18 are probably still mostly in charge of what they can, can't, or must do) are used to adults being in charge of things…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:03 AM
1

As a mildly autistic male, fuck you. I can't be "not creepy". People sense that shit. If I enter a room and someone is there, I don't even have to talk to them, they probably already think I'll be a serial killer later in life.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:22 AM
1

This is not the doing of feminism, this is the doing of a Christian Conservative political position which wants people to make babies.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:09 AM
2

Poland is... not the best example of following EU rulings.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:07 AM
1

Well, there are multiple aspects to this. For removing, arguments are Patrick Little is a hateful piece of shit (which is trumped by freedom of speech) Azure is owned privately, freedom of association applies Against removing freedom of speech (in this case trumped by freedom of association) the links were reported as phising links, which is simply not true, so this being the reason for possible removal is wrong EDIT: also what's the Men's rights asoect of this story?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:54 AM
1

Yeah, chopping up 6m3 of wood in 30-35°C would quickly change her mind.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:44 AM
11

Ok, so especially in the lower karma department of this comment section I see a few misunderstandings of what is going on, so I'd like to make a few things clear two universities teach gender studies in Hungary, ELTE (which is publicly funded, so it's taxpayer money for teaching gender studies) and CEU which is private. The majority (meaning 11 people starting the course last year) goes to ELTE. from the extremely low number of students, it can be seen that this is not a practical decision, it's…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:33 AM
2

Salon.com Ah, typing this into the url bar was the mistake if you were looking for anything remotely like a coherent non-partisan article.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:16 AM
5

Please don't, your life's worth is not dependent on some fuckwits' ideas about how men should be treated.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 12:35 AM
1

Rven if it was beneficial to health - which you can see from other comments, it isn't - you are still amputating a part of an infant without his consent, as he can't consent. Would you like it if someone chopped your legs off so you don't get a fungi infection in your nails? Thought so.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:49 PM
2

One of these things is not like the others.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 12:26 AM
33

it was odd because he barely gets absent WHAT THE EVERLOVING FUCK DO YOU THINK HAPPENS IF YOU ACCUSE SOMEBODY OF A CRIME WHERE YOUR WORD IS USUALLY ENOUGH TO JAIL THEM FOR TWO DECADES?!? sorry but this needed to get out
/r/MensRights06/08/18 06:16 PM
15

A little too obvious to make an impact, like figuring out it's fake in the title obvious. If you want to actually make people rethink their views a) make it less obvious, it's better if they have time to build up their outrage before it gets to a sudden stop with "just kidding reverse the genders and it's about the us" b) post it somewhere where people don't already care about men - although this sub is good testing grounds.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 11:33 PM
6

Autism doesn't make you "retarded" in the "not being smart" meaning, just socially. I am very probably mildly autistic and compared to the vast majority of people around me, college is a walk in the park for me, but interacting with others I have often been told that I am creepy, retarded, clueless about obvious clues, cringy, anti-social, sometimes even that I will be a serial killer and it's just a matter of time. Once I even had to explain myself to a friend after he touched my hand unexpecte…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/18 07:57 PM
1

I think that's a pretty baseless assumption tgat feminists would conplain about lack of females in this. Yes, they are often moronic, but so do you seem to be.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 10:58 PM
9

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights30/07/18 10:30 AM
18

I think not attacking her is enough of a sign that I don't want to attack her. I won't fucking pretend to be on the phone so some girl feels safe from rape (I assume this is what they meant), just like I don't demand everybody to pretend to be on the phone so I don't fear being mugged or stabbed.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 10:30 AM
1

Oh yeah, and you should put both of them down, just like women should put both of them down. That way when you flush, the water containing piss and poop doesn't get into the air.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 10:19 AM
8

Don't give in when the time comes.
/r/MensRights29/07/18 10:17 AM
4

Good, it's better for your health and shows them the go woke get broke.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:15 PM
37

But... maybe I'm just autistic but the person who posted that cake and the person who screenshotted it are different people, aren't they?
/r/MensRights28/07/18 09:03 PM
7

Sad but true.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/18 12:00 PM
28

But they all have to be male citizens.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/18 02:59 AM
16

do I really need the /s? This is the internet, you always do.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 02:51 PM
8

Did she succeed?
/r/MensRights22/07/18 09:56 AM
6

If I understand the post correctly, his ex wasn't pregnant at the time he broke up with her, it was just a hypothetical. Luckily.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 09:55 AM
2

For the kids part - I'm a man and for some reason, most very small kids (like toddler small) really like me, I can easily cheer them up. Sometimes when taking the same bus or waiting in the same line, I entertain them by making weird faces or by hiding behind things and appearing again, or simply by smiling at them. They really enjoy this and often play along and laugh, but I fear a bit what happens when one of the mothers notice this, thinking I have bad intentions simply because I'm a man.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 11:41 AM
2

This was so surreally cringe that I couldn't watch half of it even in Dave's presentation.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 09:01 PM
1

By mentioning their intent I was trying to imply that I somehow doubt they will expand it to men later.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 12:57 PM
2

Yes, I tried to imply as strongly as possible that I don't consider something not being natural to be a bad thing. Also, since the making of a comment I researched the issue for a reply I made to the original commenter, and it seems to confirm your statement about the likeliness of gays molesting children.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:42 PM
1

What he calls "sexism" is really just a natural response to what we find repulsive due to years and years of tradition and biology. Highlighted the parts that made me think you were also talking about older, deeper rooted instincts besides society's standards a few decades ago. Naturally this makes me think you are making two arguments, one about biologically rooted causes and one about causes existing because of society. blatantly tried to misrepresent my argument The reason I didn't address yo…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 07:27 PM
2

Didn't say I agreed, u/Thaurane wanted someone to elaborate and I did. I am about 90% sure this is what u/202700000000 meant, sure enough that I wrote it down for him.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:12 PM
20

He very probably meant muslim laws taking hold there.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 12:33 PM
30

Disagreed. Well, not entirely - yes it's a man taking over a woman's role. But (unlike you probably think based on your tone and word choices) he should be allowed to do that, just like in a heterosexual couple, it should be allowed for the dad to stay with the kids and the mom to go to work. While "unnatural", meaning simply that it isn't (well, wasn't) the normal way in nature, we have abandoned many things we did when we were in tribes tens of thousands of years ago, so it's not a good argume…
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:13 AM
16

This sounds like something that is a reason for a breakup, not something that is a reason to get the police involved. That already happened.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:03 AM
1

Next time try not to give it away in the first sentence. I'm not saying that it proved you a troll outright, it was the latter parts, but it proved outright that the rest is not worth reading. When making a good troll post, you want your readers to read more than half a sentence before going "nah, this shit is not worth my time".
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:32 PM
15

I have a good feeling it's the latter.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 08:24 PM
8

Chill, this is just a wordplay on stereotypes (about how you can't effectively argue with women, which if you ask me tells more about women than about men), it doesn't want to end your existence or bring you into slavery.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 06:55 PM
1

If you thought of a title for your thoughts and what you came up with is "you guys are 100% right" you have a serious misunderstanding of what the MRA is. If you honestly believe this, good for you, but this isn't the place you'll find many like minded people.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 07:03 PM
13

Yeah, we'll have to give them that - it's way easier and cheaper to test if this works on a smaller prison population. But still, if the intent was to "test it" rather than give women special treatment, they could have done so much better, even selecting randomly "for the program" seems a better idea.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:48 AM
11

I have read it multiple times and still can't make sense of it... > uses the "1 in (now apparently not 6, not 5, not 4, but) 3 statistic, that was from a very unreliable study at best, and thr numbers srem to change very frequently > assumes that for every offended there is an offender, rather than few people offending multiple times (and when she acknowledges this possibility, places the number of reoffending at... 2? Fucking 2?) > assumes that when something is about women, nothing is done abo…
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:50 PM
0

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:45 PM
5

Oh my fucking god, how could I write that down and not notice? And no, I'm not having a stroke, I'm just really tired.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 09:18 AM
22

Positive character traits that are traditionally perceived to be masculine, I guess?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 08:41 AM
2

Makes sense. EDIT: no sarcasm, I really think this makes sense
/r/MensRights04/07/18 03:31 AM
12

Doing household chores is a holiday conpared to some jobs, so they can fuck off.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:28 PM
11

men with 'disqualifying' disabilities must also register That's interesting. Wouldn't they be let go of anyways when sorting out who actually needs to serve? That just creates unnecessary administration.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:40 AM
13

or the justice system Lol no, you will face the justice system if you have the audacity to protect yourself. Maybe even if she attacks you with a knife or some similar weapon and you just hit back.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:41 PM
47

Good response: "and I am not sorry".
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:37 PM
3

I don't know why your comment is at -1 (now 0). Yes, if a woman hits you, you hit back, but you don't have to break their skull in. The force used should be just enough to win the fight. Just like with a man, your goal shouldn't be getting him/her to the hospital for 3 months, just hitting him/her enough so (s)he doesn't want to or can't continue fighting.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 02:35 PM
4

r/TumblrInAction is one where the climate is similar to here but the topic of the posts are idiotic SJWs and feminists.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 10:02 AM
1

If I were you, I would definitely try to find out whether she is planning on pressing charges against you as the course of action you should take in each case differs. Just be VERY careful not to make her press charges in the process of finding it out (for example trying to ask this from a mutual friend who is on her side and after you asking, he would suggest it to her to do this). If you can't be careful enough, let it go, you'll find out later anyways. In the case of her not getting the state…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:11 PM
4

Talk about draconian rules...
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:00 PM
2

Man wants to see his son. Woman does everything in her power to make this miserable for him, hoping that he'll give up.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 10:27 AM
3

Ok, I'll assume you are serious, let's start this over. From the beginning it was made clear that we are on the same side; Against circumcision. (Please note that this paragraph is merely an explanation of why some people treated you as pro-circumcision, and this is the only paragraph that is related to the quote from your comment) The logic which could lead to your point being seen as effectively (note this word, it's important) pro-circumcision is that no amount of information will change some…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 06:57 PM
4

ban on circumcision = communism Yeah, obvious (maybe concern?) troll is obvious. EDIT: reading the replies to your comment down this comment-tree I see you have also consistently avoided answering any uncomfortable questions about your beliefs in the topic, reverting to "but iihm against circumcision".
/r/MensRights27/06/18 12:26 PM
2

I've heard that many people have joined UKIP to revive it for multiple reasons, like actually doing Brexit (original goal of the party), restoring freedom of expression, etc.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 12:17 PM
3

Mainly anti-feminist: ShoeOnHead, Undoomed (although Undoomed is more a pawning channel than a reasoned opposition) General political channels which contain anti-feminism: Sargon of Akkad, Dave Cullen (channel name: ComputingForever)
/r/MensRights27/06/18 12:06 PM
3

Pleeease, don't be that guy. I normally don't mind that guy, but you are a bit over the top with technicalities.
/r/MensRights27/06/18 11:48 AM
3

Who would have thought? /s
/r/MensRights27/06/18 11:46 AM
1

The pre-hyphen part of the title is auto-generated by Reddit, the post-hyphen part is my own comment on it.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:19 PM
1

No, the question is not stupid if it asks for a reason for deviation from 50-50, not from some skewed "80-20" or other figure.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:17 PM
2

I haven't dug into the exact methods and sources of this data, I just see this as an acknowledgement of "yeah, women abuse children, too", for that technicalities are not that important. But if you want to use this as a source for what it says (more abusive), the links are there and you can check the data, I hope with the depth you need.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:14 PM
3

I consider the acknowledgement of the problem's existence as a step forward. Not giving excuses is a few more steps down the line.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:05 PM
1

I think being abused as a child is linked to being an abuser later on in life. Might edit this comment if I find sources.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:53 PM
3

Even if they are not more likely, only "just as likely", it's a huge problem that society doesn't acknowledge it. But yes, this is a factor that needs to be corrected for, so more accurate results can be achieved, if the method for counting doesn't take this into consideration.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:49 PM
2

Wow... when I posted this I didn't think it would make so many people share their experiences about abusive mothers. As someone with good parents, I can't even imagine what you have gone through and how it affected your life.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:42 PM
45

The good ol' women are wonderful effect.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:47 PM
12

Well, it's something I guess.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:46 PM
19

After reading your comment I've read the article 3 more times, but I couldn't find any 80 percent figure in it. Either I'm severely tired now which deteriorated my reading comprehension (utterly possible as I had to correct 4 typos in this short comment) or you misread something.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:24 PM
98

Sorry to hear that you had to bear such a horrible person, and at that one that should have helped you.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:15 PM
4

Well, you can't have everything at once. I'm just glad that the situation seems to gradually get better.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:14 PM
3

From an interview with the father, who may or may not be reliable. Tho some of these can be racr checked by the state if they want to do so.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 11:39 AM
1

I'm really sorry for what happened to you and hope you can find peace with this if the caused damage is not reversible.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 03:32 PM
1

Well, the point of blockchain based technologies is kinda "fuck anyone who tries to control us" most of the time.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 03:23 PM
3

And this addresses his point how exactly?
/r/MensRights22/06/18 02:50 PM
2

actively prioritizing women I think this is the reason for anger you are looking for.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 02:42 PM
2

I don't know about you, but I would rather be on the street than having part of my dick chopped of. One is reversible by hard work, the other ruins parts of your life forever.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 02:24 PM
11

Yeah, it does not belong here, and she is a rare case, but you don't need to be an asshole about it.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:55 PM
5

u/auMatech, u/Julietsa it's called a kafkatrap, aka you prove something by saying that denying it's true also proves it. Basically a catch 22 with a fancy name.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:20 PM
5

The hell did I just read?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:18 PM
-1

I am transracial and my pronouns are nigger and niggaself. Your move, PC crowd.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:58 PM
32

r/pussypass
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:56 PM
7

Daily reminder that just like more man for a position (applying or getting in) doesn't mean sexism by itself, more women also don't mean that. It's thr guardian, so it's hard to give them the benefit of the doubt, but still, don't sink to thr level of screaming sexism without any further info. EDIT: seen the link, read the article. Well, there was sexism in it, and I really hope that the people going on that angle based their comments on the "this position should be given to a woman and we are o…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:42 PM
3

Just a note that r/legaladvice can be a bit biased sometimes when it's about custody and fathers. You might get lucky and actually get help, but if the response you get is "yeah, nothing can be done, accept it", it's a 50/50 for genuinity.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:02 AM
37

This.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:23 PM
6

Wait what? A subreddit that is against men's rights bans people for misandry?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:20 PM
2

Yes, I believe in freedom of association (or rather I believe it should be a thing, it's weird to say I believe in it). It lets the market correct any "unacceptable" behaviour and reward acceptable ones without government intervention. I specifically would have no problem with a white-only event (or black-only, men-only, women-only, 65yo+, etc) as long as it's done by a private entity, not the government, which imo (and it seems, in the opinion of most countries and a majority of people, too) sh…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:14 AM
2

An further explanation on what moderation policy are you referring to? what is the point of this post? what does it have to do with ableism? according to whom does it equal to that?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 09:23 AM
1

^ this
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:26 PM
32

I never understood why single person bathrooms are gendered.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:40 AM
1

This just seems like another angle of attack on the mrm.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 08:46 PM
2

Imagine someone commeting "Do you think this is a joke?" on someone not taking some really sickening thing seriously enough and this bot appearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/18 06:35 AM
1

Women are attracted to confidence (in general ofc, not everyone), not assholishness. It's just that these two often go together.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 01:48 PM
1

Ah, I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/18 02:54 PM
6

Probably you are while not the only one, part of a very small group. And note that most of us don't say no one should ever be able to get a circumcision, we say that it shouldn't be forced on people who can't yet make that decision for themselves, except in cases where it's a medical necessity for some reason.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 11:50 AM
3

Soo... if I follow the logic right, this relates to incels by incels making men think that all women think of them as less because of their height?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/18 10:10 PM
2

No worries. In an ideal world, we should be able to make jokes and memes without fear of being maliciously misrepresented over it. And we should strive towards that, while also being a bit careful in the meantime.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:36 PM
4

I think deep down we all appreciate some humor in here, it's just that we're afraid that anything less than presentable as a serious, well-conducted, and emotionally impartial argument will be used to slander the image of the MRM. And I'm not saying this to urge you to remove this post, not at all. We're just a bit afraid of this. EDIT: spelling
/r/MensRights09/06/18 10:26 PM
3

It's good to read this, even if most women don't think like that. A few days ago a female friend of mine said I was sexy, and it felt weird, even if it also felt good. I realised at that moment that the reason it felt weird is because in my 20 years of life other than my mother's standard "you're a handsome boy, don't worry" occasionally, nobody has ever commented something positive on my looks as a probably average looking guy, and as I heard, I'm not the only one with this. While I realise thi…
/r/MensRights09/06/18 09:40 PM
4

Maybe "men's rights serious" and "men's rights humor" subs should be separated.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 09:23 PM
9

I would rather spend daily 15 seconds cleaning it than getting the skin cut off. By this logic you should get your nose and related things removed because gross stuff is inside it and if too much gets left in there it causes infections. But you don't do it, because it's better to take some seconds sometimes cleaning it.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 04:26 PM
3

You know even if I agreed with you on this, it's not possible to ban teenagers (including the majority of them below 18) from having sex*. Historically and even contemporarily there have been and are numerous attempts at it by parents, religions, local and countrywide legislations and laws, etc. It never works. You just can't stop that much hormones from trying. Even in Islamic countries where you can be executed for it are cases of this, it's just that they are very, very careful that no one wh…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:44 AM
51

Because tradition, and that sadly often overrides rational thought or empathy (especially in the case of men, where there is not much empathy to be found directed towards them).
/r/MensRights06/06/18 07:27 AM
2

Yeah, a kind of agreement on the internet. This is a once in a decade thing.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 07:53 PM
2

Well, you found my secret out, I'm actually the kind of guy who thinks of chemistry as just physics on a molecular scale. But yeah, that's a good point. Maybe I'm very much against intersectionality because it often takes precedence over individualism in the cases I mostly see. But in small doses, it's useful sometimes.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 06:32 PM
1

So... according to this and other comments, it's to create nuance. Well, I'll stay with individualism for that, it is the most nuanced way of viewing people.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 03:23 PM
1

Lol try and post a dissenting opinioned thread there.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:05 PM
5

Dude, this is missing a conclusion. That might be a reason you haven't heard an objection. What are you trying to say? That this is a problem? That one of these premises makes it okay that the other is true? Something entirely different? BTW all of your premises seem kind of ok except the start of 2 (It's about all of them). What is "it"? Clarification needed. Clarification might be in the missing conclusion.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:40 PM
13

The problem with the term circumcision is exactly that it's too "normal". We need a harsher term to make people think - "is this really something I support?". We need the harshness to wake people up on this issue. As for becoming defensive - yeah, this might be true, and a problem. Might be helpful to make a difference between needed and unneeded mgm/circumcision in the use of term. Circumcision for voluntary or medically needed ones, and mgm for the ones that really are just unconsented and mut…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 12:46 PM
47

Irrelevant. Individual men who could "feel unsafe" because they are more likely to be in danger aren't less in danger because of the sex of the likely offender.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 06:18 PM
7

While I realise most people are not like me in this regard (maybe more here than in the general reddit population), if a group is accused of more than two isms and phobias, I automatically assume all to be false. It's a good indicator on what is worth checking out, if it's falsely accused in the hopes of burying it, I definitely take a look.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:27 PM
0

It's like with feminism. "Feminism doesn't have a monopoly on X issue, so you saying that me supporting solving X issue doesn't make me a feminist". Is probably something you would agree with. Now repace feminism with "the mrm" and feminist with "mra" and the statement still remains true.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:15 AM
2

I suggest to create a group on minds. That platform is heavily committed to free speech. Also, if mods see this post, wouldn't it be a good plan to keep users informed on where else to go in a case like this? Sidebar, stickied post, sub description, whatever is best to do the job.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 06:22 PM
4

No, and I would explain to him that it's because he would have been bullied for it until the end of time.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 10:13 AM
1

Makes much more sense.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 08:43 PM
1

Does this refer to me? Because if so, I'm not a feminist, far from it actually, my stomach just has a low tolerance for shitty people.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:38 PM
6

I almost threw up because of that last paragraph. Yes, men rape all over the planet. So do women. But most men don't and most women don't. They always seem to forget that part. It's not a gendered problem, it's a people problem, some people are just monsters. But to blame half of them for the actions of... what? Way less than 1%? When some (not negligible) part of that number isn't even in the half that is blamed? Fuck off with that.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 05:28 PM
2

You can't even troll right.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 05:17 PM
2

WTF?
/r/MensRights25/05/18 06:37 AM
6

Well, a black eye often is a result of beating or fighting. But that could be with anyone. The reason why it's automatically assumed to be the boyfriend is above me.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:47 PM
1

Good for them, this is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:43 PM
5

WTF?
/r/MensRights22/05/18 04:01 PM
1

Contrary to the comment of u/CelticsGold, many of us don't believe that women have taken over everything in our society to destroy families, etc. Many of us think that certain activists did the things that get women a (sometimes unfair) advantage, some of these people women, some of them men, and their power is not that they are everywhere, but that men biologically have an outgroup preference for women while women naturally have an ingroup preference for women, so it's easier to advance because…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 08:39 PM
3

Sites like archive.is exist for the reason that if a site gets taken down or modified, the old version still exists on the internet. They make this pissible by letting you choose an url and making a copy of the site on that url. While this is not their original purpose, archive links do not contain ads by the original site, so it doesn't get any money for your click - so they are preferred when the site linked is something most of the audience you share it with wouldn't want to support, but woul…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 08:30 PM
6

I didn't even realise this... They killed some of the men who weren't fighting for the enemy? Holy shit.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 08:05 PM
14

There is a video from Peterson explaining that people below an iq of 83 are not needed by the (US, I think) army because there is nothing they can do to make them a net gain instead of a net loss, and how this roughly translates into "the real world". The people who are at the very bottom of society are often (not always) low iq people. Most low iq people are men. Put the rest together. Now, I don't know whether Dr. Peterson means that "should not have this discussion" is about people at the ver…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 07:28 PM
20

The fact that this is not just not illegal, but not even frowned upon... disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 07:18 PM
2

Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:08 PM
2

Judge the art, not the artist is out of fashion it seems.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:04 PM
8

From what I understood, he meant that it's a choice whether or not here and now you are still "mentally enslaved" by focusing on the past or not.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 12:43 PM
2

That... actually sounds like it could work. OP, read up on some laws is this is possible and go for it if it is.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 11:51 AM
1

Middle school is ages ... from ...? (different school system here)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/18 11:32 AM
14

We are also robbed of a more useful and fully functional bathroom appliance. Well, I find urinals to be, if not fully functional, but definitely more useful. Depending on the percentage of people who use the toilets for crapping and the percentage of those who are just pissing, the same amount of space usually ensures a faster flow of people, as more urinals take up less space. And faster flow is less waiting time.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 09:52 PM
2

Investigating further than "but she said..." is the way to go.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:20 AM
5

Investigating further than "but she said..." is the way to go.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:20 AM
1

Ah, it's a joke party. That explains many things.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:05 PM
3

Just my 2 cents, always do these in incognito so thr results are less effected by your previous searches (for potential OPs of future posta kikr this)
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:08 AM
1

I really hope you mean "if the would-be-parent is under 18 because abortion is otherwise illegal here".
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:00 AM
3

Save and crop.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:56 AM
5

Wow... This is a very detailed analysis of what and how people are looking for. Especially for a reddit comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 11:35 AM
1

Hungary.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:00 AM
1

I don't know where you live exactly, but it's weird to me that it's normal in some places that "the woman takes care of birth control". Almost every single one of my male and female friends carry condoms with themselves at least when they expect a situation where it's needed, but most of them just carry them everywhere so it's never forgotten that they should have brought it with themselves.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 10:52 PM
1

> "woman's body" argument > I don't believe your child is your body Bruh, that's a crystal clear pro-lifer here. This basically reads "you have a right to do whatever you want to with your body, but a fetus inside you is not your body".
/r/MensRights06/05/18 10:45 PM
10

What the fuck? A 13 year old is themselves a child. In my country, and I suppose in most civilized places, so I suppose where this case was, too, it's not even legal for a 13 year old to have a job. So how would they pay CS?
/r/MensRights04/05/18 06:41 AM
2

As long as it functions as planned it isn't "taken over". It's taken over the moment it isn't about helping male victims.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 08:06 AM
3

People who are in r/purplepilldebate are usually the ones woth more open minds, at least they are willing to see the others' arguments and points.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:29 AM
1

Please don't, the student pool for computer science is utter shit already and those are people who are interested in this. Source: am computer science student and most of us have no clue about basically anything
/r/MensRights27/04/18 08:45 PM
1

It was. Not original commenter, but this is an often appearing sarcastic line on r/mensrights, so I would give it a very small chance that it was serious.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 08:39 PM
2

What "just isn't true"? That there is a legitimate reason for the nickname? Or that it is a problem? I don't argue that there is a rebellion against overly-leftist and sjw values, and I'm not arguing against it being necessary. I iust say that it might prove to be too much of a rebellion in the future.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:33 PM
1

You could share the weight of creating and lifting up a new organisation by posting a kind-of-survey-kind-of-list here to collect the names of those who are in your area and interested in the project.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:39 PM
3

And bring sh0e's wage gap button.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:36 PM
9

The problem is that rebellion against something tends to be more extreme when that something is in itself more extreme, to the point where our generation (gen Z-er here) is legit nicknamed generation Zyklon after the gas that Hitler used to gas people. And it's not at all inaccurate based on some people I know.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 01:24 PM
1

Yes, agreed on that one.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 04:42 PM
2

I think "a leipard lives where I live" might be a legitimate reason for owning a gun and a license if "personal protection" counts as a good reason. EDIT: owning, not carrying
/r/MensRights25/04/18 03:37 PM
1

Very rare is an overstatement, more of them are closer to the average. Just intelligent women are almost as easy to find as just intelligent men. The further we move away from the average, the rarer women become. As a side note, there is no reason for men to be butthurt over this for being more likely to be dumb AF and for women to be butthurt over being less likely to be exceptionally intelligent, because statistics don't change an individual's worth.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 02:58 PM
41

From what I've heard their "bias" was that they weren't customers and refused to leave upon being asked multiple times.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:19 PM
2

How is the title and the content are not really... related. But I think this place is one of the very few where you can talk about it.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:56 PM
12

Almost puked in my mouse. Not from the picture.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:21 PM
1

My native language is not English, I sometimes make mistakes. But I'll edit it.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:09 PM
4

Mabye I shouldn't too heavily rely on reading internet posts to get my history/philosophy/politics right then.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:57 AM
3

You sound an awful lot like some of the people I'm pretty sure you wouldn't like for this same thinking you're doing right now, just on the opposite side. Unless you forgot a /s.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 12:00 AM
5

Marx intensifies Everything is a social class and we have to point it out.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:45 PM
1

I understand that this is your point, and agree. And it should just be a normal preference for men, too. Just pointing out that this specific woman has done nothing wrong. Not to counter your point, but to add to it.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:09 PM
1

Exactly. Everybody should be able to have their preferences.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 11:07 PM
15

This seems more like a well intentioned tip that you shouldn't waste your time, and she should be able to have those preferences. Yes, a man probably would be shamed for putting his preferences for weight or height out there, but this in itself is perfectly okay.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 06:28 PM
9

Amd we are often the ones who say that there is no winning with sjws, so some self reflection wouldn't hurt.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 03:25 PM
7

If it was way more in some other places, probably yes.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 07:57 AM
1

It's not really a big step, and I admit that I don't have a logical reason for that.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 05:09 AM
2

We migt get a more accurate result if the comments on chosen random posts get examined for content (I don't think anyone would have the capacity to do this to all posts), and those would get categorised.* Also, accounts that are active on multiple subs. * only if we can get enough reasonable unbiased people to categorise comments, and the categories themselves are pretty objective (for example "talks about the rights of X group", "criticises X group", NOT "hates Y group" etc).
/r/MensRights08/04/18 10:57 AM
1

^ this
/r/MensRights08/04/18 10:48 AM
13

Yep, this is r/TumblrInAction material, in fact I first thought I was there. For those of you who don't know, TiA is a place for these kinds of batshit crazy (mostly) social media posts.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:03 AM
1

There is an ewww factor. I don't think there should be a month for any race.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 12:17 PM
3

So basically the only thing with a shred of truth is actually not even positive because jerking off is only viewed as negative by the fee-fees of some religious people, and they are actually either neutral or some claim them to be positive for health.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 07:43 AM
3

I think there actually was a case of a babysitter (male, if I recall correctly) being obliged to pay child support a few years back. But unless you find a source on this, don't trust this comment, I generally have a terrible memory.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 11:27 AM
4

Jesus, this is getting out of hand. First it eas 1 in 6, then 1 in 4, a few month ago I've seen 1 in 4, now 1 in 3????
/r/MensRights31/03/18 11:23 AM
3

Exactly. Month for males? Go on. Month for white males? Ewww.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 11:21 AM
3

Record when she says things like that if it's legal where you live, you might find those recordings useful later.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 03:38 PM
4

far right wing Sargon of Akkad Lol, pick one, Sargon is actually slightly left wing and doesn't seem to care about skin colour. But nice b8 m8, troll elsewhere. Or in case you were serious, I would suggest re-evaluating what counts as "far right wing".
/r/MensRights30/03/18 03:18 PM
3

2) yellow. Fewer Less simple cases Great news.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 03:12 PM
9

Yep, comradejordan is a satire blog. Or at least most people at TiA really hope so.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:59 PM
60

Me: "These two people are horrible.".
/r/MensRights29/03/18 10:37 AM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 09:27 AM
3

Hats off to them for handling this situation like adults. Really a rare sight, but pleasant to hear that it's not nonexistent.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:46 AM
3

ELI5 on what is terminal erection?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:41 AM
79

Disgusting is the word that comes to mind. Both to this kind of thinking, and that the justice system allows this even after bragging about it (yes, I know that it's otherwise very hard to prove).
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:00 AM
14

Maybe send it to some youtubers - Computing Forever, Sargon, Independent Man, etc. to make a review?
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:07 PM
17

Someone should rewrite this to be as one-to-one with the original as possible while still making sense (for example instead of the car thing, burn the girl's favourite 50 shoes or IDK), spread this anonymously on the internet, watch the outrage machine go into maximum overdrive, then simply link to this book in comment sections.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 10:05 PM
2

Kinda. The root of the problem is that they can get away with false allegations. If this was fixed, everyone would think twice before yelling sexual harassment for no reason.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 10:49 AM
2

While the second quote is entirely true, I don't think the person who originally said it thought about the same "right" approach as what is really needed.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 09:02 AM
3

Diamond prices are high because it's an oligarchy - if I recall correctly a few families own all the diamond mines in the world, and they artificially keep the price up.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:59 AM
7

I think it's because of the part you quoted here - people might think that OP put the atheist part there for the same reason the SJW/etc part is there - to show how idiotic he is, while it's most likely a neutral description, and only the rest is "this guy's an idiot".
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:52 AM
8

Well, it's a great collection for others to tell feminists to fuck off, if they have the link to it, not just the pic.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:45 AM
1

Ah, I see. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 08:55 AM
2

I don't know this guy's stances on anything really, but whenever I see a post about him is "Tucker Carlson did this thing that is positive for us" and half the comments are like "ohh how I hate this guy" and "cuck" or "SJW" in some righter leaning communities. What's the hate about? EDIT: from what I have gathered so far about the guy is "good guy employed by people with a not so good agenda". Is this correct?
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:46 PM
3

It is certainly not the wrong place. I personally haven't been in such a situation, but I can advise you to edit your post to include your country for legal reasons (eg. in some countries you need to get the mother's consent for a paternity test, and various other laws that may affect the correct answer for this post).
/r/MensRights06/03/18 09:49 PM
3

Nice b8 m8.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 07:59 PM
2

With that much estrogen mimickers and testosterone disruptors in the environment, if you were born there I doubt you would care much about the girl part of the population.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 06:34 PM
3

Yeah, soft sciences fall faster for this BS. And we are kind of in a "least bad" situation when choosing who to rule us. Of course it's your choice, but I urge you to vote anyway for an opposition party that has some chance, since letting someone rule too long makes it way harder to remove them, so we have to shake things up every few years not to let that happen. And when that new party starts to dig itself in, it's time to choose some other evil again.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 10:36 AM
6

For universities: I currently study at the UD in Hungary and I haven't noticed strong feminist bias here. That might just be because I'm studying programming and IT, which are known for "i-dont-give-a-shit-antisocial" kind of people, which makes us fairly immune for ideological bullshit, but we can kind of say anything without retorsion - jokes about anything, including ones based on stereotypes of the sexes and races; opinions on feminism are rarely expressed, but that's because it's not a topi…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 08:54 AM
7

They meant "this month, the only purchases from men will be through their wives and girlfriends", right?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 08:35 PM
2

clears throat fagam I doing this right?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:29 PM
2

I don't think it will be deleted, this sub is the place to speak out about these kinds of things.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:24 PM
2

Wow. It's not just not necessary, it also harms both men (paints the movement in a bad colour and therefore makes it less accepted outside of the movement) and women (because they are being bashed).
/r/MensRights25/02/18 11:23 AM
11

I already use duckduckgo as my main search engine, protonmail instead of Gmail, and plan on switching from gdrive. Mainly because I don't plan on supporting the insanity going on at Google. But this damn android phone, that's hard to get an alternative for if you also dislike Apple (for other reasons).
/r/MensRights25/02/18 10:48 AM
0

Is it Sunday so soon? Oh, it is.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 10:40 AM
4

Just be careful - this can be resolved by either not kicking you out or kicking both of you out, and I guess you want to achieve the former - don't accidentally cause the latter.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 09:18 AM
1

The Pence rule is "don't meet with women without a trustable third party". Completely agreed.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:18 PM
2

Well, there is a reason that things and movements like MGTOW and "the Pence rule" are more and more widespread. It's people like your bf's ex.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:50 PM
7

No, meninism is a troll movement making fun of feminism. MRA is the word you are looking for. EDIT: Not that there is anything wrong with trolling feminism, just that the serious term is not this.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:14 AM
1

Functionally you're the troll now. The guy said something entirely reasonable and on-topic, while you're just throwing ad hominems one after another. I don't know if you're trolling or just butthurt, but neither is needed, thanks.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 06:21 PM
1

Does the bot know this date format?
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:49 PM
1

remindme! 2023.02.15. 18:00
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:49 PM
4

Agreed.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:15 PM
25

And then there are places where they could sue the victim for recording them without consent and win the case.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:59 PM
3

What the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:43 PM
2

There are countries where there is a "social security network" for children. For example where I live after giving birth, the mother receives a monthly "payment" for (I think) 3 years after all your children under 25 (again, I think it's 25, not entirely sure) who are still in the educational system, don't work and don't have children of their own, you get some money back from your taxes, the exact figures depending on the number of children fitting these conditions and your total income this sy…
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:21 PM
2

I think there is a gene in humans which makes it possible to regrow parts, but it's naturally disabled in people because in the past, the people who were born with the active gene got cancer way easier than those who had the inactive one, so it kind of died out. It can be temporarily reactivated though, but that's just a theoretical possibility and of course, would increase the risk of cancer.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:25 PM
2

I'm white and I don't mind being called a snow nigger, but of course everyone's limit for offense is different.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 04:03 PM
49

Talk about overly sensitive...
/r/MensRights02/02/18 08:58 PM
1

Agreed with u/cld8 that if the bus has lots of empty seats, it's not a problem. I usually travel with two bags, and it's hard to put them next to my leg and stay comfortable, so I put them on the seat next to me. But that's only when there are still at least 6-8 empty seats in my general area, as soon as that number drops below 4-5, I remove the bag from the seat and put it on the floor.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 02:25 PM
1

ban woman only spaces to have them stop talking negatively about males Dude, isn't that a bit Orwellian? Yeah, they are shitty people, but a) they'll just find another way to talk shit and it would just increase their contempt of us b) it would unnecessarily punish those who use those spaces for legit purposes (like how men sometimes need man only places, I imagine it's the same case with women)
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:37 AM
145

I don't mind if a certain group is entirely women, but to celebrate it for gender equality is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:48 PM
4

What kind of experiment are you running by posting the same thing twice with titles and comments that express a very different opinion on the topic?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 02:50 AM
18

The head of the penis gets desensitivised over time if it's not protected by the foreskin.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 02:40 AM
2

I don't think women are more virtuous then men, but I also don't think men are more virtuous than women. Technically, because of the way mathematics works, one gender is on average more virtuous than the other if we find a way to quantify that, but it's like with the "race and IQ" debate - since it's statistics, it cannot be applied to any single individual when making conclusions, from statistical data, you can derive only statistical conclusions. This nature of statistics throws the first arti…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 01:49 PM
2

If someone does it, we need a link here.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 01:40 PM
13

Wonder what's the reason for this thinking. For the sake of her kids, let's hope it's not projection...
/r/MensRights30/12/17 09:45 PM
2

Not completely sure1, but I think Duolingo generates sentences randomly (eg. in this case the machine has a list of adjectives, and a list of nouns, and chooses one-one at random, which can result in weird but technically correct expressions). If it works that way, crying sexism here makes as much sense as complaining that the dice rolling app gave you a five, and you don't like that number. 1: if someone knows the exact workings of Duolingo's algorithm, please share with us.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 02:40 PM
1

If this happens, it will give a boost to TERFs. Do we really want that?
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:04 PM
3

I'm pretty sure "do it!" and things alike also mean yes.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:51 PM
4

Good point. Haven't thought of the research part. EDIT: Congratulations, you actually changed the mind of somebody on the internet.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 10:17 PM
-4

While this is unfortunate, we can't help it, so it's not worth the energy to talk about it in the context of "men's rights".
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:34 PM
2

No. It means that some part of the 94.3% happened but didn't leave enough evidence to prove, and another part didn't happen. As for which part is how big, arguing doesn't make much sense as there is no undeniable evidence for either side, just speculations and (sometimes educated) guesses.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter