TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TheDude41 Archive

View 23 posts and 4,900 comments by TheDude41 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
173

False AccusationTheDude41/r/MensRights07/02/16 07:00 AM
162

Edu./Occu.TheDude41/r/MensRights22/04/16 04:29 AM
99

TheDude41/r/MensRights23/01/16 09:25 AM
47

DiscriminationTheDude41/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:09 AM
44

DiscriminationTheDude41/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:57 AM
40

Legal RightsTheDude41/r/MensRights07/11/15 08:43 AM
31

GeneralTheDude41/r/MensRights15/10/15 05:03 AM
23

Blue Pill ExampleTheDude41/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 05:42 AM
21

Social IssuesTheDude41/r/MensRights22/07/15 07:55 AM
18

FeminismTheDude41/r/MensRights10/04/16 11:52 PM
17

Edu./Occu.TheDude41/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:52 AM
17

TheDude41/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:09 PM
16

TheDude41/r/MensRights03/05/16 03:13 AM
14

TheDude41/r/MensRights15/05/16 06:51 AM
14

Social IssuesTheDude41/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:59 AM
14

TheDude41/r/MensRights20/05/16 08:20 AM
8

Legal RightsTheDude41/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:58 PM
7

Social IssuesTheDude41/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:51 AM
7

Social IssuesTheDude41/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:39 AM
6

Social IssuesTheDude41/r/MensRights14/11/15 07:15 AM
4

GeneralTheDude41/r/MensRights08/11/15 04:38 PM
4

Social IssuesTheDude41/r/MensRights27/10/15 08:57 AM
3

Edu./Occu.TheDude41/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:57 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,900 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

a
/r/MGTOW24/08/16 12:13 PM
2

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:47 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:17 PM
2

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:16 PM
5

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:02 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 07:33 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 05:12 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 01:45 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 12:30 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 12:10 PM
5

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 03:10 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 03:09 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 03:03 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 02:59 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 02:58 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 02:57 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 02:51 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 02:42 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 02:39 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights31/07/16 02:39 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:52 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:39 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights30/07/16 04:36 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:45 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:26 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:01 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:21 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:02 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:52 AM
6

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:44 AM
5

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:43 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:42 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:40 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:33 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:30 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:25 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:23 AM
3

aa
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:22 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 07:42 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 07:24 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 12:32 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights29/07/16 12:14 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:44 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 04:58 PM
7

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 03:33 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:57 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:36 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:36 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 02:06 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:50 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:46 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:44 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 01:04 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:37 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights28/07/16 12:34 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 08:33 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 08:33 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 08:25 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:25 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:23 AM
4

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:48 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:36 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:21 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:12 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 12:55 PM
0

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 12:53 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:30 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:27 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:22 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:20 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 05:18 AM
5

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 03:27 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 01:46 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 01:45 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights26/07/16 12:18 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights25/07/16 07:33 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights25/07/16 07:30 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:19 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:11 PM
2

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 01:15 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 12:54 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:47 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:39 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:18 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 05:17 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:29 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:28 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:25 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:20 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:09 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:06 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:05 AM
5

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 04:03 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights24/07/16 03:57 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights23/07/16 12:02 PM
2

a
/r/MensRights23/07/16 05:02 AM
10

a
/r/MensRights23/07/16 05:00 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:59 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:49 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights23/07/16 04:43 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 09:26 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 05:56 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 12:32 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:50 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:49 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:48 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:48 AM
4

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:44 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:42 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:36 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:34 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:30 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:29 AM
12

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:28 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:23 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights21/07/16 05:35 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:52 PM
2

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:36 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:26 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:58 PM
3

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:41 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:40 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:18 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:17 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:14 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:35 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:31 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:29 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 11:11 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:26 AM
5

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 08:18 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:15 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:13 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:08 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:06 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:06 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:04 AM
2

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 08:02 AM
1

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 07:48 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:32 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:30 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:10 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:37 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:34 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:27 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:56 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:55 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:42 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:28 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:21 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:12 AM
1

aaa
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:05 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:04 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:03 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:02 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:02 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:00 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:59 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:59 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:58 AM
1

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 04:53 AM
1

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 04:51 AM
8

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:48 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:42 AM
1

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 04:38 AM
7

a
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:12 AM
2

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 03:10 AM
21

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 03:06 AM
1

a
/r/MGTOW20/07/16 03:05 AM
23

a
/r/MGTOW19/07/16 07:59 PM
36

a
/r/MGTOW19/07/16 07:57 PM
5

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 07:35 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 05:15 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:43 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:23 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:22 PM
2

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:59 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:58 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:55 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:54 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 03:51 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:16 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:33 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:31 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:24 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:21 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:21 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:20 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:19 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:18 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:17 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:16 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:14 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:10 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:09 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 05:07 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 04:56 AM
4

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 04:53 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 04:36 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:44 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights17/07/16 09:07 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights17/07/16 07:12 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights17/07/16 07:11 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights17/07/16 07:07 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights16/07/16 07:51 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights16/07/16 06:17 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights16/07/16 01:55 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights16/07/16 01:53 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 10:51 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 10:48 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 10:27 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:47 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:38 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:34 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:32 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:32 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:21 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:12 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:09 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:08 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:07 AM
5

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:06 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:03 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:50 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:46 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:43 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:42 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:39 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:37 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:36 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:34 AM
1

aa
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:32 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:31 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:27 AM
–

a
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:22 AM
4

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 05:12 PM
–

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 07:58 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 07:54 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:31 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:25 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:22 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:19 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:18 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:16 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:11 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights13/07/16 12:33 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights13/07/16 05:53 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights13/07/16 05:26 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights13/07/16 04:49 AM
2

Probably.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 12:32 PM
–

The best source on statistics on these matters is Christina Hoff Sommers. Her two books, Who Stole Feminism and The War Against Boys are tops, though Who Stole Feminism is by now many years old. There is an updated version of the War Against Boys. I'm sure you can purchase them for the Amazon Kindle App for your phone or laptop.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:22 AM
1

Librarian?
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:20 AM
2

I put up a source and did the math here, but I didn't break it down according to who was armed vs. unarmed. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/488a6y/during_his_oscar_presentation_joe_biden_made_it_a/d0ji3q9 The same link provides information on unarmed here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings/ Over the same period, you had 104 fatal police shootings of unarmed males versus 5 fatal police shootings of unarmed females. That means an unarmed male is 20.8 ti…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:18 AM
1

This is true.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:17 AM
0

I feel bad for the guy. I hope things change for the better, some day.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:16 AM
–

He's so privileged, he has to grovel in front of his matriarchal, largely female school community -- curry favor from the women and gynosycophant shitheads who hold his future in his hands. White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:08 AM
–

Mike Buchanan (https://j4mb.wordpress.com/campaign-for-merit-in-business/) has compiled some very convincing data on this. Follow his links and you can get some great resources.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:07 AM
2

Way to go Mike Huckabee!
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:58 AM
1

I don't know why men tolerate this.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 02:28 AM
–

If a woman reports a stranger rape resulting in a manhunt, they often throw the book at her for "wasting police time and resources", "frightening the public" and "making it harder for real victims of rape to come forward." If a woman accuses a specific person who is then falsely arrested (battery by proxy), falsely detained (false imprisonment by proxy), falsely jailed (false imprisonment by proxy) or falsely incarcerated (false imprisonment by proxy), but the lie is later discovered by investig…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:35 AM
1

... Because no mature, rational person cares whether or not you get laid. How old are you? 23? If women on average are generally worse than men in aspects such as physical ability, security-protectiveness Irrelevant in a modern society, and generally wrong. agency Damseling is not an intrinsic flaw, or even really a "flaw" at all. It's a behavior motivated by secondary gain. There is no reason to capitulate to it. (whether in secret or publicly) Again you are wrong. Is it mostly to do with not g…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 08:09 PM
0

May depend on the time & jurisdiction. You'd have to know what the law was back then. But even if it wasn't legally speaking sexual abuse, it could still have been very shitty.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 08:24 PM
3

What will be truly remarkable will be for a powerful female politician to come out batting explicitly for men's rights the way many prominent male politicians have come out batting for women's rights over the years. I suggest the new female Prime Minister begin a a tradition of handing out white feathers to other women, thereby beseeching women to make sacrifices to their protected status in society for the benefit of men.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:40 AM
1

"We've come from the government and we're here to help!" "Oh dear god." Good riddance.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:17 AM
3

Ridiculous. It's sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:13 AM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 06:43 AM
–

what my boss didn't know is that, we live in a one-party-consent province, i recorded the conversation, and sent it to the ontario employment board, in which it clearly states that one cannot be fired or intimidated on the job for their political viewpoints, regardless of where they share them(the only stipulation would be for hate speech, of which i was not engaging in) FUCKING AWESOME! I've been wanting people to do exactly this sort of shit for years! Let me know how it turns out. Brilliant.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 06:42 AM
–

and so it was that i lost 13 friends, and 5 family members, in the span of 22 minutes. Lulz, way to let them weed themselves out. As soon as they pop their ignorant little heads above ground to character assassinate you or try to silence you, tell them they are wrong, that's no way to treat a friend, unfriend them, and block their messages. I have former near lifelong friends who have tried to contact me years afterwards wondering why I unfriended them and went dark to them years ago. I never re…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 06:37 AM
1

What did I do, to point out their double standard? I've called Roosh V a dick, and did the same to Trump. Then made my buddy report it for slurs. Waited a little, whether it gets removed, or sandboxed. Nothing. After a while I've pointed out the double standard of reducing someone to genitals, to which with a slight delay they responded with sandboxing my comments. So if you call someone a cunt, who is documented harassing and threatening people, you are not only moderated, but punished for viol…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 06:34 AM
–

Gotta have more cameras at all police stops. should be mandatory in every state, for everyone's protection. Unfortunately, police departments are too busy blowing money on things like license plate scanners, so they can invade everyone's privacy and contribute to the general public nuisance. By the way, always cooperate and be polite to cops. Their job is shit.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 06:30 AM
2

"I'm here for self affirmation." Good. I'm here to burst your bubble.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 06:28 AM
2

You can follow-up by telling her that I say, that white females are the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet. It's true! That's what I would tell her.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 04:13 AM
2

Please make this a regular feature. I want to see it too.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 04:12 AM
2

Opiates are something you just don't fuck A lot of people winding up jobless and/or dead with that stuff these days...
/r/MensRights09/07/16 04:09 AM
2

I'm asking my doctor when I see him next week to refer me to a urologist. I really hope he can get me in to see one who's very familiar with men's health. Urologists deal probably more than 75% with males. The only female bits they deal with are bladder and kidney, which they also do in men. Women with problems with their lady bits usually see gynecologists. There are less drastic options than castration, Yes, there should be. And after 9 years, it's pretty astonishing that folks have only just …
/r/MensRights09/07/16 04:05 AM
–

I'm so desperate I'm considering buying whatever heavy-duty opiate off the street I can find just for a couple days so I can have even a little bit of relief. Don't to that. I'd sooner freeze down sperm & amputate an aching nut (replace it with a prosthetic one) than touch that nasty, addictive stuff. EDIT: Oh... you've got it on both sides? That makes it a more difficult decision. Done having kids yet? Already had vasectomies? Still, after 9 years, if it's been treated unsuccessfully that long,…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:58 AM
2

Men run the world... And prioritize women's wellbeing over men's. Chivalry. It's crap.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:53 AM
–

Get off the opiates. Look up the number of people who are dying from overdoses every year from prescription opiates. It's pretty astonishing, and has been increasing rapidly.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:51 AM
2

You often hear that line about how if men had to take birth control there would be zero side effects Actually, the bias in Western countries is against male hormones, not female hormones. The bias in western countries against testosterone is misandry. Legalize pot? Try legalizing androgens first. These days, women walk around pumped full of exogenous female hormones provided on request for a hodgepodge of self-declared and largely unverifiable reasons, by mandate even paid for by others. Indicat…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:35 AM
2

My response is, if you want to apply that sort of thing (chivalry) in politics or at my place of work: fuck you. And if you think I'm going to do it in my house, or if you think you are going to teach my kids that crap, fuck you too. And if you think my sons are going to step aside for your daughters, fuck you again. And if you think you're going to block a man's way from exiting a sinking ship because you think the "ladies" should exit first, you're going to get a big, fat fist in your face. An…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:26 AM
1

As an anti-chivalrist, my response is: I don't give a crap what other people do in their relationships. If a guy wants to lick a woman up the crack of her butt for seven days straight, then get himself shot in the gut in her "honor" on the eighth, to me, that's just a cautionary tale. But there is no room for neochivalry, in any sense of the word, in government, social policy or institutional policy. My response is, do whatever you want with your own family, but if you want to apply that sort of…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:16 AM
2

I hold chivalrous ideals for the women in my life. As an anti-chivalrist, my response is: whoopdee do. I don't give a crap what other people do in their relationships. If a guy wants to lick a woman up the crack of her butt for seven days straight, then get himself shot in the gut in her "honor" on the eighth, to me, that's just a cautionary tale. But there is no room for neochivalry, in any sense of the word, in government, social policy or institutional policy. My response is, do whatever you …
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:15 AM
1

I just put women a little higher because I feel they deserve it. No, not any more than men, they don't.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:13 AM
1

Chivalry is worth murdering, whether feminism is a thing or not.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:12 AM
3

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:12 AM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 03:11 AM
1

I repeat: There is no legal presumption in the US. Wrong. See below. There is in Sweden. It seems, not really, at least from the paper you linked in your OP, which states that in Sweden: According to the travaux préparatoires joint custody against the wishes of one parent should be ordered only ”with great care and consideration”. 7 It is expressly stated that it must not be ordered against the wishes of a parent.. if the conflict between the parents is so severe that it is impossible for them t…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 02:50 AM
-1

You're silly.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 02:03 AM
–

#malelivesmatter . I for one, embrace the #blacklivesmatter movement as a subset of the #malelivesmatter movement. All male lives matter, including black male lives.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 09:44 PM
2

Another day, another damseling shithead.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 09:41 PM
1

No it isn't. "Joint physical custody" is defined in the paper I linked as 50% custody. Which paper? Where in this paper that you linked is "joint physical custody" defined as 50% custody? http://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/38-11.pdf Where? I already posted a quote from your own paper that suggests the exact opposite of your claim. In your paper, footnote 6 states clearly that "joint physical custody" in Sweden does not mean that children in Sweden in joint custody necessarily split 50% of the tim…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:55 PM
9

Mike Nifong: "If she says, yes, it’s them, or one or two of them, I have an obligation to put that to a jury." “I have told the defense attorneys that if at any time the victim in this case tells me that she thinks that one of these people who have been identified was not her assailant, as soon as she tells me that, then that case will go away,” he said. “I’ve said I’m not interested in prosecuting somebody that’s innocent. But until she tells me that, until she tells me these are not the right …
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:51 AM
0

What a chivalrous dickwad looks like, and who he panders to: http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/037/099/i02/african-lion-pride.jpg?1361809335
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:40 AM
8

Yes he does have sovereign (prosecutorial) immunity, as does the county. http://www.crimeandfederalism.com/2006/06/district_attorn.html https://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2008/11/durham-state-law-cant-touch-us.html
/r/MensRights08/07/16 03:59 AM
–

Chivalrist dickwad Mike Nifong. If the man is exonerated, I hope Nifong gets sentenced to the same term that this man served. Nifong should be personally responsible for financial damages. Repeal sovereign immunity. People like Mike Nifong should feel the full force of the law and be treated no differently than anyone else. Time for all of the cases that man was involved in to be re-examined.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:35 AM
16

Fucking ridiculous. Kick those fuckers out of office.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:13 AM
–

Don't see much wrong with the law, at least in so far as the law is presented by the BBC. Which is not to say that's an accurate representation. Kinda stupid that they stuck in the part about the Lohfink case, without mentioning reports which state that the judge / prosecutor concluded that Lohfink said "no" to being filmed (filming without consent being the crime that the two men were convicted of), and did not say "no" to having sex. Which makes the Lohfink case altogether irrelevant to the ne…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:51 PM
1

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:44 PM
0

Nothing conquers modern guerilla warfare. If your fighting against guerillas, you'd best just get the fuck out. That's not what conscription is for either.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:40 PM
–

"Masculinity" is mostly a gender feminist term.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:37 PM
–

Bull. There isn't a military person on the planet who, when engaged in full-on combat, wouldn't rather have twice as many boots on the ground. The more there are, the sooner the opposition is finished off, and therefore the fewer casualties on your own side. It's simply the law of numbers, and it applies in every circumstance where mandatory conscription lays into combat.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:31 PM
–

They abandoned it because the major industrialized powers became so technologically advanced, they didn't need as many soldiers to engage i small regional conflicts.. Those aren't the circumstances where a draft arises though. A draft arises when there aren't enough boots to put on the ground.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:26 PM
2

Sure. Another reason to draft women.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:24 PM
–

LOL ridiculous. The US hasn't even come to a stalemate in a war since Korea, in the 50's. Pretty much every other significant military excursion since then has been a complete and utter failure. It has nothing to do with what troops do to "win hearts and minds."
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:47 PM
–

Pack lighter.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:43 PM
–

No. You just have half of the people doing those jobs as females, just as everywhere else. No reason not to draft. Not drafting women would be special treatment.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 07:19 PM
–

As I pointed out before the Vietnamese consistently lost most battles, Perhaps so. But not for being short. And ultimately, despite all the technological advantages of the US, we lost. Modern warfare is not the NBA. It's not Arnold Schwarzenegger smiting another dude with his 20 pound Zweihänder like in Conan. There are these things called bullets. In most instances, the big dudes are larger targets.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:58 PM
–

I'm sure there was more carrying by hand by 5'2" 110 lb Viet Cong there than by American soldiers in nearly every war since WWI. Which would be rightly viewed as special treatment, never mind the fact minefield clearing takes special training. I never sad that you treat them specially. Special treatment would be not drafting them.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:55 PM
1

LOL what alternative? OK then. #malelivesmatter I stand in solidarity with #blackmalelivesmatter . There you go. It's a men's rights issue. rolls eyes
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:42 PM
1

What removal?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:39 PM
–

Yeah. But it's not, really.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:39 PM
1

"Embrace and expand."
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:37 PM
–

Twice as many people holding guns does not mean less safe. That's just your imagination.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:35 PM
1

Yup. They are men, and it appears they are affected more frequently than white men, but all are affected.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:34 PM
1

Look at my OP. I said, #malelivesmatter .
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:32 PM
–

They used mules and land trains, and were given equipment by the Chinese/Soviets, not to mention the fact that the environment made jeeps unsuitable full stop. And a woman can't drive a jeep or pack a mule then? If it's not in a jungle, where 5'2" 110 lbs Vietnamese men already demonstrated they can kick big American asses off into the ocean, they ought to do much better where there are jeeps. If not, just order them to clear mines, or stand by a roadside checking cars for bombs.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:28 PM
1

I disagree. Let's face it, it's not unarmed black women who are being shot by police in large number. It's black men, and white men. It is a men's rights issue. Black men are a subset of men, all of whom are adversely affected by police brutality an unfair treatment in the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 06:14 PM
1

so by your logic, for every one white person shot, five black people are shot; this would mean 80% of your 104 killings were potentially black Negatory. I already told you. The overall ratio of fatal shooting of unarmed blacks to fatal shootings of unarmed non-Hispanic whites is 1.15:1 (very close to 1:1). In contrast, there were 20.8 times more unarmed males than unarmed females who were shot and killed by police. The estimated likelihood of unarmed black men being 5.5 x more likely to be shot …
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:39 PM
1

Really, when was the last time you ever heard of a woman getting pulled over for a broken tail light, shot and killed by cops? For example, information on shootings of unarmed persons by police here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings/ Over the same period, you had 104 fatal police shootings of unarmed males versus 5 fatal police shootings of unarmed females. That means an unarmed male is 20.8 times more likely than an unarmed female to be shot and killed by police…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:46 PM
–

Yup. And some men are fatties too.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:40 PM
–

LOL irrelevant. Give them guns, and put them on the front line. At least there will be twice as many people with guns.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:38 PM
–

Fuck all, they bleed the same. That's all that matters.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:36 PM
–

No, that's it really.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:34 PM
1

Yup.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:34 PM
2

That doesn't accomplish anything whatsoever, unless you do it by constitutional amendment. A new law needs to be passed in order to institute a draft anyway. So what do they do if they want a draft? Write a law to re-institute a draft. Then you're stuck with the same old ladies-first chivalrist crap where men are bearing the burden of conscripted service and wee wittle wimmens do jack crap.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:34 PM
–

No, it's because there were a lot of them. And they were guerrillas.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:55 PM
2

Erdely’s excuse? Jackie seemed traumatized and that made her, in Erdely’s eyes, credible. Right. Emotion = fact. The usual bullcrap.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:52 PM
2

They probably assumed, that because they were women, no-one would have the gall to challenge their claims. Expecting the usual chivalrist dipshit reaction.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:48 PM
1

No problem. I've done it myself.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:45 PM
1

This is what happens when women believe a tits and a uterus elevates them above reason and scrutiny. Sometimes I have a hard time knowing who is the bigger idiot: the women who do this, or the men who let them get away with it. Right now, I have to think it's the men who let them get away with it. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:44 PM
1

Well, everybody screws up once in a while. I still like the guy.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:41 PM
–

None of that matters. We lost an entire war to Vietnamese and Chinese people that included a large percentage of scrawny short guys and even children. They kicked our holy big American asses, just because there were a lot of them. The average height for a Vietnamese male is currently 5 ft 4 in (162.1 cm). Average weight for a Vietnamese male is 117 lbs. (53.3 kg). Back in 1970's, their average height and weight were significantly less. Average height for a Vietnamese male in the 1970's was 5 ft …
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:40 PM
–

I'm aware that he is not an MRA.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:36 PM
1

Another day, another damseling shithead.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:29 PM
–

Right. Archive.is it.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:29 PM
-1

LOL who me?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:27 PM
-7

support some of the key concerns of blacklivesmatter, but not the leadership which is more interested in being attention seeking assholes instead of finding real solutions. Yeah, who gives a shit?
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:08 PM
2

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 10:21 AM
-14

I think the MRM could learn a thing or two from them. Get out and make a nuisance of yourselves. It works.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 10:20 AM
–

There will be plenty of lesbians no matter which prison they go to.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 10:06 AM
–

Yeah, I don't think that's the current understanding or current definition of the term.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 10:04 AM
1

LOL looks like they're back: Sorry for the annoyance. If you need to be remodded / unbanned / etc. let us know and we'll try to put it right. solidarity in misandry, -- thepinkmask Horrible bigots should be fun to watch.
/r/MGTOW07/07/16 09:08 AM
1

... but we need to close all women's prisons! Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet. 24 years is not long enough.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 08:59 AM
1

Mods are still understandably shell-shocked at the sheer number of idiots who tried to prove that complete moron Brock Turner innocent. Should have banned some of those threads instead.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 08:35 AM
–

Nice to hear. I still don't like the name. Red Pill folks don't even believe in political activism for men, seem solely interesting in doing whatever it takes to impress women and copulate, and most seem not to even give a shit about their fellow man, unless they're also interested in impressing women and copulating. The red pill, in a nutshell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzddAYYDZkk
/r/MensRights07/07/16 08:17 AM
1

What's with the recycled toxic masculinity meme? The reason why it's essential for fathers to have rights to raise their children, is that fathers have a right to raise their children, and their children have a right to be raised by them.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 08:10 AM
1

Fifteen years ago, just having a sex tape go viral on the internet was enough to insure a lifetime of wealth and the pampered life of a celebrity (a.k.a. Paris Hilton, Kim Khardashian). Now that will get you nothing. Because nobody gives a fuck about your boring sex tape. Nowadays, a person has to claim that they were raped to get people to bother to look at their sex tape to try to find out what really happened. Anyway. That's one shitty sex tape.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 08:03 AM
–

Already saw it.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:15 AM
–

I think he's more likely to respond positively than Hillary. For sure.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:12 AM
1

Agree.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:01 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 01:32 AM
–

Well, maybe it is standard practice. But not all politicians do it.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 11:48 PM
2

Well, 99% of what he's done, has been monumental. I'm just not so sure of what has been going on recently. Could be wrong though. Who knows.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 11:46 PM
1

If a journalists lacks the capability to report accurately, adhere to basic journalistic standards, and has to instead resort to parroting what a thousand other outfits are are also saying, then they have no business writing an article about it. But I see your point. I don't view this as a phenomenon isolated to reporting of foreign news items though. Same-language reporting is unfortunately just as bad.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:27 PM
–

No, it's not.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:14 PM
–

Farrell would have more luck approaching Donald Trump. Warren Farrell lately seems to have taken on promoting some esoteric version of the "toxic masculinity" meme. I'm not even sure if he's a male ally anymore. Recently, he started to sound a little bit like a man-bashing feminist. Keeping an eye out though, who knows. I suppose it's conceivable that Hillary's man-hating ladies-first antics are all just a phony ruse that she promotes in order to pander to the female vote, and that in reality sh…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:13 PM
–

I agree. It' a tall order to expect good journalism from liberal arts educated emotive nincompoops.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:11 PM
1

"Odds still largely favor the wife being awarded custody of the children unless she is proven to be a detriment to them, an unfit mother. It's an uphill battle for a man seeking custody of his children, but can be easier if the wife doesn't want her children or is confined to a jail or mental institution." Rev. Lawrence Shannon, The Predatory Female
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:07 PM
1

We live in a matriarchy, and have for a long time. Ironically, it is usually an apex male who extends to women the special privileges and immunities which women enjoy, and feel entitled to. So it is very much a mutually dependent relationship between the two. The only one who gets screwed in the deal are the ordinary males. A great many females actually prefer an apex male leader over a female leader, because when a male leader extends special privileges to women, his motivations are often perce…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:03 PM
1

To me the position that only synthetic pills and vials which are manufactured in a laboratory are fit to be use as medicine is untenable. That's not the position. Straw man argument. Alot of these manufactured drugs are actually derived from plants that have great medicinal properties. Well generally speaking, plants are not so great in so far as medicinal properties. Why do plants containing medicinal chemicals exist? Because millions of years of evolution have allowed some plants to be toxic. …
/r/MGTOW06/07/16 11:41 AM
2

That would be nice.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:39 AM
–

Well, she's entitled to feel however she wants. But, I'm wondering why she assumes anyone should care how she feels.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:20 AM
8

They don't want to explain the case, because, if they do, then the judgement of the prosecutor and judge will be seen as reasonable.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:10 AM
3

Mine too.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:08 AM
6

Ah I see. Now that makes sense.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:07 AM
–

Probably not a bad ruling. Nonsense for journalists to try to report on this case without including the actual video depicting what happened.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:07 AM
1

I can see why we don't agree on the shared parenting label :P Well, I don't really know whether it's shared parenting, or not. From my reading of the law, it sounds to me like it's not. But I'm not a lawyer. So I'm more asking the question. Until we have someone in here who is close to the bill or knowledgeable on how this plays out in family courts in Missouri, I won't be sure I'm convinced one way or the other. Thanks though for contributing your thoughts. I'm no lawyer either!
/r/MensRights06/07/16 03:48 AM
1

Where did I say that eating very low carb would cure him of lyme disease? Where did I say that you said anything about low carbs? Improved diet can improve health, but it has nothing to do with "preventing the dominance of any one infection." Stop spewing complete nonsense.
/r/MGTOW06/07/16 01:51 AM
1

What tests? Specifically, which tests? That link is useless. It doesn't contain one whit of information on what tests you had that diagnosed you with allegedly having lyme disease, or what "supplements" you took that would allegedly help you with your alleged condition.
/r/MGTOW05/07/16 08:28 PM
1

Of course, if you seek out quacks, you will more than likely find quacks who are willing to drain you bank account by selling you "supplements." Which supplements are you talking about here? Name them, and their specific (alleged to be) active ingredients. There is hardly anyone who can't tolerate some form of antibiotics long term. If you have an active infection, your only option is to find an antibiotic that is reasonably tolerable, and then suck it up until your treatment is complete. "Suppl…
/r/MGTOW05/07/16 08:28 PM
3

Yup. Fraud.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 01:12 PM
2

They have it even better now... Of course there's no going back. No sense in that.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 12:57 PM
–

Suck it up, buttercup.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:06 AM
4

"The only time anyone ever tells a guy to 'be a man' is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest."
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:02 AM
–

Start a local group on Facebook and on meetup.com.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:00 AM
2

Fantastic.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:06 PM
1

I don't really care if women have abortions.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 06:13 PM
1

Nice lady. I'd vote for her.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:04 PM
1

Not even an American company anymore. It's owned by InBev (Belgian). Seth Rogan exposes himself as a total tool.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 02:59 PM
2

"the data presented here lend no more support to the validity of the alleged sex abuse incidents than data gathered via a Ouija Board." That was my immediate reaction also. ... saying the provincial health minister... repeatedly failed to live up to his legislative duties while the woman's father faced accusations of sexual assault. Justice Nancy Key has awarded the woman's mother more than $61,000 in costs for months of legal wrangling. So the father was handcuffed, detained, and put through a …
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:31 AM
5

Remember, no matter how bad things seem, they can always get worse. Keep on fighting.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:23 AM
2

Usually the guys who say things like that are the ones most interested in getting in a girl's pants. I could give a fuck, frankly.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:19 AM
1

Sexual assault. The girls get kicked out of school and thrown in juvi.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:17 AM
1

But his sense of relief fell away when the Mounties handcuffed him, He was assaulted battered and falsely imprisoned by the accuser(s), who used police as their proxy. Interesting that the names of the group home and the accusers were not made public. Should be mandatory. For the next six months, he and his wife were effectively prohibited from seeing their daughter Once again, false imprisonment. These are violent crimes. The false accusers should face a prison sentence. The matriarchy has reac…
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:13 AM
1

My take on "benevolent" sexism: Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet. Odd, they only call it "benevolent" sexism when it benefits women. If it benefits men, they call it what it is: just sexism.
/r/MensRights03/07/16 06:40 PM
–

Pg 11. #4. Here is the full text of Pg11. #4: \4. The general assembly finds and declares that it is the public policy of this state that frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with both parents after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage is in the best interest of the child, except for cases where the court specifically finds that such contact is not in the best interest of the child, and that it is the public policy of this state to encourage parents to participate in dec…
/r/MensRights03/07/16 01:33 AM
–

Bill contains "frequent, continuing and meaningful contact" with both parents as the preferred premise of "child's best interest" Where does the actual bill say that? I posted the text. Can you point to where it says that? If you look at the actual text of the law that was passed, what it says is this: The courts hall consider, in a proceeding to enforce or modify a permanent custody or visitation order or judgment, a party's violation, without good cause, of a provision of the parenting plan, f…
/r/MensRights02/07/16 01:11 PM
–

Well, there is no point in men talking about their feelings so long as women are telling men what their feelings ought to be.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 05:06 AM
–

Here is the bill summary. http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills161/sumpdf/HB1550T.pdf It sounds like a good law, but it doesn't sound like a shared parenting law to me.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 04:45 AM
–

What is the actual impact of this going to be? As or shared parenting, does the new law actually have any teeth to it, or is it just some nice little therapy speak to encourage couples to "be nice" (as if that is going to do anything)? Is the the final text as it was passed? If so, I don't see where it changes much with regards to shared parenting. Can someone with better knowledge explain? http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills161/billpdf/truly/HB1550T.PDF Bold type are portions of the law …
/r/MensRights02/07/16 04:37 AM
–

Gee, maybe the administrators at Berkley will investigate.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 12:52 PM
2

http://starecat.com/women-feminist-internet-opinions-help-misogyny/
/r/MensRights01/07/16 09:12 AM
1

Feminism, at its core, is the belief that women are deserving of every fundamental right men have. Okay. So men are also deserving of every fundamental right that women have. crickets No, really, men are deserving of every fundamental right that women have. Help, me! I'm a damsel. No wait... Some argue that a man cannot truly be a feminist since men benefit from male privilege and can’t truly sympathize with women’s issues. Ha! You just don't understand, I'm a woman. No, really, men are deservin…
/r/MensRights01/07/16 03:52 AM
–

Feminism, at its core, is the belief that women are deserving of every fundamental right men have. Okay. So men are also deserving of every fundamental right that women have. crickets No, really, men are deserving of every fundamental right that women have. Help, me! I'm a damsel. No wait... Some argue that a man cannot truly be a feminist since men benefit from male privilege and can’t truly sympathize with women’s issues. Ha! You just don't understand, I'm a woman. No, really, men are deservin…
/r/MensRights01/07/16 03:46 AM
1

This sounds awesome. I will keep the information and post it in case I see someone come calling. Hope that is okay. Others should do the same.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 03:40 AM
12

Yet a lot of feminist rhetoric today does cross the line from attacks on sexism into attacks on men, with a strong focus on personal behavior: the way they talk, the way they approach relationships, even the way they sit on public transit. Male faults are stated as sweeping condemnations; objecting to such generalizations is taken as a sign of complicity. Meanwhile, similar indictments of women would be considered grossly misogynistic. Bingo.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 02:43 AM
–

I wonder how many times the victim / ex boyfriend reported to police that he though this particular ex was stalking him.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 02:28 AM
1

Soft sentencing for female criminals... It's archaic ladies first bullcrap.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 02:32 AM
1

Also FYI: In the criminal justice system discrimination against males is actually a more pervasive problem than discrimination based on race. http://goodmenproject.com/ethics-values/sentencing-gap-men-likely-go-prison-mrzs/ https://archive.is/Xguqa For example, after controlling for all variables, including prior criminal record and other factors, males receive sentences that are 63% longer than comparably situated females. In contrast, blacks receive sentences that are 10% longer than comparabl…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 08:26 AM
1

MRAs gets furious when someone points out that a myth about Sweden is just far-right propaganda. I'm sure it happens. But it's also true that many socialists go apeshit when someone points out a myth or challenges a narrative about Sweden, or about socialism in general.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 08:10 AM
1

I encourage you to find anything like that with Milo. And if you want something longer to watch, see how Shapiro just tears up a an ACLU lawyer in this conversation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cUDl_LEtak (1) Seattle NAACP (2) Conservative activist Monique Somebody (3) Seattle stranger columnist (4) Ben Shapiro
/r/MensRights29/06/16 08:04 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4prs3s/united_nations_sweden_the_country_lead_by/ The Lauren Southern video is not representative of discussion here on /r/Mensright and in fact has nothing to do with men's rights at all, as the majority of respondents pointed out. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4p0iag/feminists_dont_challenge_radical_islam_because/ Not a racist post.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:59 AM
1

Occasionally I see anti-muslim sentiment, but I wouldn't consider that a common occurrence. Never seen a discussion about Black immigrants here ever...
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:47 AM
1

I wouldn't say so. I myself do have a lot of sympathy for blacks and for those in the black lives matter movement. But I wouldn't go so far as to say that people who don't like BLM are necessarily racists. Realize also, that the biggest demographic factor predicting when a person is mistreated in the criminal justice is sex (males treated worse), not race. I put up a source and did the math here, but I didn't break it down according to who was armed vs. unarmed. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRigh…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:42 AM
2

Bizarre that they nuked that thread. I don't see much wrong with it. If anything, it's too tame.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:28 AM
8

In the school cafeteria today, for the girls we have: empowerment for girls how to break down barriers everyone who criticizes you must be wrong nothing can be your fault; that leaves males wear whatever you want, if a boy even looks at you wrong, smack the proto-rapist here's some money, please spend it And for the boys we have: wait for it wait for it move aside, ladies first, still holding please wait some more (are you still there?) move aside, the school cafeteria is currently serving other…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:23 AM
1

LOL you were discredited for not being a credulous nutter.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:20 AM
3

Appeal.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:16 AM
2

Now, the article does admit that, according to the College Board, “No differences in the scores of boys and girls of comparable ability were found on the questions in dispute.” This is unsurprising. It is far more likely that study participants in academic studies focusing on “stereotype threat”, find it easy to respond sarcastically, (knowingly) in a false manner, or intentionally in a manner to produce a desired outcome in SJW-oriented “stereotype threat” study, because in academic studies, re…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:08 AM
–

I'm avoiding calling them MRA's because they probably don't identify as such, I'm fairly certain neither of them consider themselves to be MRAs. Ben also takes on the guts of those movements such as the ACLU lawyers, Didn't see a link with an ACLU lawyer. You seem to have a double standard of what you consider advocating for the MRM for Milo (more inclusive because you include his anti-SJW stuff) and Ben (more exclusive because you exclude his anti-SJW stuff). Here is a link to one of the videos…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:47 AM
1

"Milo Yiannopoulos has pulled out of the conference" Too bad he's not going.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:24 AM
2

Fuck you, mom.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 04:53 AM
2

First, a "black out" is not a loss of consciousness. A black out is a loss of memory for activities that transpired while the person was drunk. During a "black out", a person generally acts in a conscious manner, and may even actively participate in a sexual interlude. Imagine a person who does something outrageous at a party. Then, when confronted about it the next day, the person has no recollection of what they did. That's a black out. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackout_(drug-related_amne…
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:35 AM
–

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:23 AM
1

Is that true? Never heard of it.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:22 AM
1

Is this going to sell more beer? No. If anything, it will sell less. It's amazing the depths of self destruction some companies (and men) will go to in order to impress a female. I don't drink much beer, but if I did, you can be sure it won't be Budweiser.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 11:38 PM
–

Sorry, I wasn't clear on what you meant by: I find it strange how you dismiss a broader point because some of the examples do not fit directly within the the MRM. The point is not the examples, the point is the broader principle. Were you saying that Shapiro addresses broader things that people don't necessarily relate to the MRM? Certainly true. Milo does as well, when he talks about things like black lives matter, SJW, free speech. But most of Milo's videos / speeches revolve in some way about…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 06:07 AM
–

Post some links then. I'll check it out.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:52 AM
–

I wasn't aware that Ben Shapiro was interested in courting the MRM. Any person with strident pro-male views would surely be well received. Keep posting his videos and articles related to the MRM here. See what happens. Maybe he'd do a Dangerous Jew College Tour - would be cool.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:45 AM
–

Yeah right, people think Sweden sucks because they are white racists. Never mind that Sweden is one of the whitest countries on the entire face of the fucking planet. rolls eyes Sure there is all sorts of misinformation out there. As always, on both sides. I'm not even sure if this thread has any merit to it.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:07 AM
–

No, I don't think so. In the US, the first step is taken in court by a judge who decides. There is usually no effective presumption. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_custody_(United_States)#Joint_legal_custody Joint (EDIT legal) custody may occur often anyway Most parents agree to joint legal custody arrangements in the US without the direct involvement of a judge. And in most (all?) states in the US, there are court precedents establishing joint legal custody as being an assumed norm for div…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 04:51 AM
–

That birth control is still not easily accessible to everyone. Oral contraceptives at Walmart: http://www.walmart.com/cp/1078664 CASH PRICES WITHOUT INSURANCE: Levonorgestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol - $9 (28-day Supply) Kurvelo - $9 (28-day Supply) Enskyce - $9 (28-day Supply) Pirmella 1/35 - $9 (28-day Supply) Pirmella 7/7/7 - $9 (28-day Supply) Sprintec - $9 (28-day Supply) Tri-Sprintec - $9 (28-day Supply) ... in other words, less than your typical co-pay for getting your blood pressure meds, or an…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 07:13 AM
2

My point exactly.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 07:04 AM
2

Another day, another bunch of damseling shitheads. Buy your girlfriend a can of mace, and tell her not to bother you anymore with bizarre paranoid stories.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 07:04 AM
–

... or maybe you're talking about broader issues, such as "protected groups" other than women? Well, I've said that here before and I'll say it again. Females are a different circumstance than other demographic groups. In reality, white feminists are mostly spoiled brats who grew up in the burbs, spend daddy's and mommy's money. Afterwards, many choose to damsel all through high school and forever (feminists), mostly for secondary gain, as if they had to scrape it all together starting in a ghet…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 06:40 AM
–

So, not necessarily Ben Shapiro then? Who else is out there finding an audience on college campuses other than Yiannapoulos? He's putting a lot of effort into his tour. I think we should all appreciate it. Christina Hoff Sommers does a pretty good job. But she seems not to go on speaking engagements nearly as often. Camille Paglia used to give some magnificent speeches (I attended one about 25 years ago). But she seems not to tour as often nowadays either. To tour college campuses as Milo has, y…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 06:33 AM
1

In most states there is no automatic ASSUMPTION of joint legal custody after a divorce. You may recall that there was a ballot initiative in N. Dakota on this issue. In most states of the US, there actually is a presumption of joint legal custody of the child, unless one parent is deemed unfit (just as in Sweden). What they don't have in the US a presumption of shared (as opposed to joint) physical custody. Basic terminology: Joint legal custody: Both parents have the legal right to influence ma…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:26 AM
–

In most states there is no automatic ASSUMPTION of joint legal custody after a divorce. You may recall that there was a ballot initiative in N. Dakota on this issue. In most states of the US, there actually is a presumption of joint legal custody of the child, unless one parent is deemed unfit (just as in Sweden). What they don't have in the US a presumption of shared (as opposed to joint) physical custody. Basic terminology: Joint legal custody: Both parents have the legal right to influence ma…
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:01 AM
2

Yeah. I wouldn't even consider it a future possible wrong for a real victim not to come forward because of a prior false accusation, because one has nothing to do with the other, and because it's mostly self-inflicted if one has a problem dealing with the truth.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 04:32 AM
15

"Unless you have the same standards of cleanliness and adopt the set priorities set by the woman who lords it over you, you are a misogynistic shithead." rolls eyes My mom was a complete slob, hardly ever did housework, and hated to cook when I was growing up. Any criticism was considered "misogyny" also. Heads she wins, tails you lose. Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 02:24 AM
2

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 12:11 AM
1

I was speaking in slight hyperbole. They're not going to try to invite a guy into her kid's life, just to save the government some money, unless he makes a stink. She might feel raped.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 12:10 AM
–

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/12/31/22124881-dad-files-130m-lawsuit-after-son-in-utah-is-given-up-for-adoption http://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/father-rebuilds-life-with-daughter-after-losing-her-in-a-wrongful-adoption-hesaid/ http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/paternity-registry/396044/ http://archive.sltrib.com/story.php?ref=/sltrib/news/57432393-78/utah-adoption-lawsuit-fathers.html.csp
/r/MensRights26/06/16 09:13 PM
–

Basically, yes. Of course you'll complain that whatever women get, is never enough. But basically, yes.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:30 PM
5

Notice that the suffering of the poor estranged husband who was falsely arrested and falsely charged with rape and domestic violence, is completely ignored by the media, and also (if the reporting is responsible) by the prosecutor. Instead, all sympathy in this case is drawn out for unnamed females who have nothing at all to do with the case at hand and are suffer no ill consequences due the case whatsoever. If I were the estranged husband, and this news article accurately reflects the prosecuto…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:25 PM
–

States usually spare no expense in making things as comfortable as possible for wee wittle womens.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:08 PM
–

WTF are you talking about?
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:03 PM
–

Based on reading from this link, how can one conclude that the Swedish system is this any better than the U.S. system? In the US, nearly all states award joint legal custody by default to both parents, just as in Sweden. The fact that this also happens in Sweden is a non-sequitur. The big issue in the US is physical custody, which is pretty much a separate issue from legal custody. According to your link, these concepts of legal and physical custody in Sweden are also separate, and there is also…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 07:58 PM
1

Ladies first horseshit. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 07:52 PM
1

Endocrine disrupters = malarky. female/male ratio jump to two females for every male birth in industrial areas. Not true. Just ignorant. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2054475/How-women-turning-Mean-Girls-arent-good-men-there.html As for the article itself, it has nothing to do with endocrine disrupters, but it's also malarky. Hugo Schwyzer is an idiot Article summary: men discriminated against, but women are the true victims of discrimination against men. WTF?
/r/MensRights26/06/16 07:45 PM
1

Nice well articulated article.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 07:45 PM
1

I doubt they look very hard. they probably just assume that if he's not there raising a stink, he must be a bad parent. For example, we have cases in this country of women putting up children for adoption, and adoption agencies intentionally not notifying the dad, in order to push an adoption forward while keeping the kid away from the father. Dads literally need to spend tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorney fees to rescue their children from agencies that basically steal kids co…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 07:35 PM
–

Doubtful.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 07:20 PM
1

I think you're right!
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:44 PM
1

Someone's got to work!
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:32 PM
1

Thanks! You too!
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:31 PM
3

Well, it is a gender issue in the instance where the father is a competent parent, but the mother is not, yet despite that being the case, the father is still most often looked over.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:57 AM
–

I wonder how often they seek out the dad to try to place the child with him...
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:55 AM
2

If anyone ever approaches me about this supposed crime, I promise to let rip a long smelly one, right in front of them.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:53 AM
1

When I was a waitress and a man tipped me in pennies, I addressed the entire restaurant and pointed at his wife and announced: "I just had to spend an hour, but I'm so sorry you have to spend a lifetime with him." If your service was shitty or you gave him attitude, then your anger was not justified. If your service was good and he did it to be malicious, then your anger was justified. If he was just making a joke, then you lack a sense of humor. Which is the worst option of all, considering tha…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:30 AM
3

Archive.is version: https://archive.is/jhb4a It all depends on the reason why the person is angry. If the reason is trivial, trite or indicates an entitled attitude, I don't react well to it. If the reason is, well, reasonable, then I may even sympathize with the angry person.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:22 AM
5

I demand that you make me feel safe! I demand that you do something about my feelings! You're right. That is ridiculous. There are people who "feel" unsafe no matter where they are, when they are and who they are with. Assuming that someone's feelings about an event are more important than what actually happened, is irrational nonsense.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:18 AM
2

Yeah, if you're a man or a woman, and you beat the crap out of another person who catcalled you, or flashed you a glimpse of his or her crotch or whatever, I'd only be satisfied if see the inside of a prison cell for battering someone who is not acting in a violent manner. Sure, people who are proven flashers should be tried for their crimes. But beating the crap out of someone who is not acting in a violent matter is a whole higher level of criminality that is totally inappropriate for that sit…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:12 AM
1

It's completely amazing how, within a fraction of second, that woman shifts from aggressive powerwoman to high damseling mode. Literally, a split second. And she's completely thunderstruck that a guy doesn't care a whit for her damseling antics, and actually has the gall to speak truth in her highborn presence. People actually believe in this shit? Incredible.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 05:50 AM
2

Well, I don't know about that, but she's pretty shitty here.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 05:16 AM
–

Someone with some audio expertise needs to take the ringtone that was made from her voice and alter the voice to make it sound like a witch. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1485363/Be%20Better.m4r Then I'll play it gleefully as a ring tone. "if you just think that going to work and coming home makes you a man..." Actually, no, I don't give a fuck what it means. Fuck all that "being a man."
/r/MensRights26/06/16 05:16 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/fetish/comments/4lwtgu/is_anyone_else_turned_on_by_gross_asses/ Barf I rest my case. Seriously, I suggest you see an endocrinologist and ask what he might do to keep your libido under control. 'cause that's just gross.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:50 AM
2

India s in big trouble. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:44 AM
–

A great reason to fight for men's involvement with their children. Healthier kids. Another great reason to fight for men's involvement with their children: healthier men.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:39 AM
–

Being called a "Nazi" didn't stop the Nazis either.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:37 AM
–

Not really going to cause most MRAs to have one viewpoint or another.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:34 AM
1

Does that mean you're celibate? Would it matter if I were? But no, I'm not. There is a lot more to life than getting your dick filthy.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 03:29 AM
1

I make money to prepare a nice retirement and to leave behind a comfortable life for my biological children. What's wrong with jerking off and playing video games all day? Actually, I think jerking off the porn is far preferable to fucking sluts all day. You've already made it clear that the women you are consorting with are no shining examples of human beauty. Not that it would make a difference. At least with porn, the women are attractive, and you don't have to deal with strange smelling orif…
/r/MensRights26/06/16 03:09 AM
–

Shapiro and Milo are both great. Milo seems to be doing a better job of getting himself out there to the MRM. Plus, Shapiro tends to say a lot of things that are going to be off-putting to many in the MRM, such as being stridently anti-abortion (whereas Milo is more low-key about it and presents it as a side issue), and expressing a lot of paleoconservative male stuff (e.g. chivalry) that a lot of men in the MRM aren't going to be interested in following. Bottom line, Shapiro seems to be a conse…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 08:55 PM
1

Where's the movement going to be in 5 years if that's all Milo does and most of the money from within the movement goes to him instead of being split up more to the people who actually researched this information? I don't think the others would be getting much money, whether or not Milo does what he does. If someone else has a message and presents it well, they will gain listeners.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 08:32 PM
2

Now Milo brings a lot of attention to the MRM and against SJW's/Feminism which is great, but ask yourself: When's the last time Milo actually taught you something. He's being heard mainly by people who agree with him in a fashion that is preaching to the choir. Preaching to the choir? Even if that were true, that's what feminists do all the time. Yet they're so successful, how bad can it be? It ought to be great. In reality, may I remind you, the stuff Milo says might be old to you, but you're n…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 08:31 PM
–

Not much different than saying you like jerking off and playing videos games all day.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 08:03 PM
–

Yes. It is said that the sex drive transcends all boundaries of logic and reason. Younger men in particular stumble around individually, doing ridiculous things fueled by the vapors emanating from their gonads. Adults used to have a sobering influence on hormone-fueled excursions, but no more. These days, most adults have little real-world experience consorting with lecherous sluts, yet may have a distorted viewpoint on it from looking at media and porn, and so are particularly ill prepared to o…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 04:36 PM
–

Yuck.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 12:31 PM
2

True. Well, it's not just the ripple effect on others. It's also the guys who end up in prison for 15, 30 years for a crime they didn't commit. Which happens fairly frequently, by the way.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:23 AM
1

... but we need to close all women's prisons. rolls eyes
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:13 AM
–

Yuck.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:50 AM
1

Plus I take it you’ve already tried to get this done, have you? No. They don't kick anyone off here.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:49 AM
1

Everybody hates studs. It's usually women who believe it's unfair when someone else has an unflattering opinion of them.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:22 AM
1

nice.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 02:41 AM
1

Joe Biden is a right wing campaigner? According to whom?
/r/MensRights24/06/16 02:41 AM
2

Religious people certainly should feel welcome here.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 02:30 AM
3

Probably a lot of young boys being molested by women now too... yuck.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:42 PM
1

The answer is simple: decriminalize anabolic steroids. Makes more sense than sitting around smoking pot all day in Oregon or Colorado (where it is legal).
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:36 PM
1

Are you trying to tell me I can't have an opinion? Where's all that commitment for freedom of expression you had a moment ago suddenly gone? Suit yourself. Say what you want. I think what you're saying is dumb. If I were a mod, I'd kick you off and let you say it elsewhere. But... c'est la vie. ... do you really crave the approval of women that much? No, I don't. That's why I don't have problems with saying a woman is a slut when she is a slut. I'd say a man who is a slut is a slut too, but the …
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:30 PM
1

True.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:26 PM
1

Good point. Not that I believe that she was raped.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:20 PM
–

Is this a place where emotional retards can whine about not having the perfect girlfriend or is it actually about seriously choosing which legal issues matter? I never heard him say anything of the sort. For all I know, he already has a girlfriend. While we're in the practice of directing people to other forums, perhaps you should go here: https://www.reddit.com/r/gentlemen ... because we're not in the business of being gentlemen, just like feminists aren't in the business of being ladies.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 01:19 PM
–

Actually, I rather like it here. It appears from your objections that you don't. Why don't you leave?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:57 PM
–

It's not that I object to people airing "their personal grievances about their sexual frustrations" as such, but it's just - why here? Why not here? Because it offends your sensibilities? That's not a valid reason.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:55 PM
–

LOL who anointed you monarch? but they can - if they're retarded enough - accuse him of misogyny or whatever for having that preference Yup. That's what people do all the time. And it's not just people on Jezebel. It's not even just feminists. Ordinary people will frequently do it. You know, the usual, "protect the wee wittle women's honor" chivalrist horseshit. Much like you're doing here yourself. And that isn't censorship - that's me asking OP to justify why this post is here and not somewher…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:49 PM
–

No thanks.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:44 PM
2

Another day, another damseling shithead.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:29 PM
–

says she defended herself after rape This is getting to be a common theme.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:28 PM
–

Regardless, it's not really related to a legal right or issue, is it? Yes, it happens to be. Freedom of association, freedom of expression. Anti censorship. Not that it would be out of bounds if it wasn't. Being opposed to the usual PC bullcrap is reason enough to talk about it here.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:27 PM
–

Was that supposed to be a difficult question? Nobody here was asking you to solve any "problems."
/r/MensRights23/06/16 12:23 PM
–

Up is down. Down is up. Gotcha. unless you have hang-ups about it and get squicked out or insecure. If that were true, so what?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:38 AM
–

The OP is not airing a personal grievance about his sexual frustrations. He is airing a grievance about others having a grievance about his sexual preferences.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:37 AM
1

One supposes you are pondering another type of relationship that the OP would wish not to have.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:33 AM
1

It's not just feminists -- look at the responses to this post. For some, it can take time to come to the very logical conclusion you just made. It doesn't help that there are oodles of people trying to shame people for "slut shaming." Spread the knowledge. That's why we're here.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:30 AM
0

The friend of your enemy is not your enemy.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:28 AM
1

LOL, that's true.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:28 AM
0

In reality the number shouldn't matter. Not everyone has a desire to invest in a faithless renegade who fucks for sport.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:27 AM
–

Suck it up, buttercup.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:52 PM
–

A classic. Love it. LOL "I have three children!" So does your ex husband.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:47 PM
–

There is no double standard against women. Men who sleep around are culturally though of as being pigs. So are women. The only difference is, men are generally assumed to be pigs at baseline, even with no direct knowledge about their sexual behaviors. Most men who sleep around probably realize that they will be assumed to be pigs no matter what -- so what difference does it make? Whether they sleep around or not, they're still considered pigs. On the other hand, women are by default placed on a …
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:44 PM
3

There is no double standard against women. Men who sleep around are culturally though of as being pigs. So are women. The only difference is, men are generally assumed to be pigs at baseline, even with no direct knowledge about their sexual behaviors. Most men who sleep around probably realize that they will be assumed to be pigs no matter what -- so what difference does it make? Whether they sleep around or not, they're still treated like pigs. On the other hand, women are by default placed on …
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:43 PM
0

Paternity test your kids.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:38 PM
8

"Pay attention to me day." That's like nearly every day for some people.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:34 PM
1

LOL doesn't surprise me in the least.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 12:32 PM
5

If crying was a way for men to get an extension of their school writing project, custody of his kids in a divorce, a suspended sentence for something that would normally land him in prison, a White House Council on Boys & Men, more male teachers that aren't openly hostile to the way that boys think & learn, his wife arrested instead of him in a domestic dispute where he defended himself against his wife, a department of men's studies on campus that actually cared about issues that impact ordinar…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:28 AM
-6

LOL.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:21 AM
1

Yes! It is good for Chad Thundercock as well.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:17 AM
1

Why wasn't he recording?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:03 AM
2

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 05:25 AM
–

You are a complete idiot. Go away.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 10:18 PM
1

True. Men? They are openly ridiculed even by the very feminists who want men to cry... True, unless they cry for feminist or female-endorsed causes.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 10:34 AM
1

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human being on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 09:54 AM
1

Glad you found us!
/r/MensRights20/06/16 09:35 AM
1

"Everyone is equal but some are more equal than others."
/r/MensRights20/06/16 09:35 AM
1

Does your GF expect you to say "you're sorry", act like a "gentleman", or to generally be apologetic for your existence? If so, you really do have a problem on your hands. Time to find a new one, because the image is just the least thing wrong with her.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 09:20 AM
1

Another day, another damseling shithead. White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 09:18 AM
9

There is no sense in men and boys expressing their emotions, so long as women see fit to dictate to men and boys what their emotions ought to be. Remove the emotional overlay projected onto young children by teachers, Hanna Rosin (so effortlessly on display in her article), and others, and you just might find out what it is that boys actually feel. But in the end Rosin seems not to have a clue. She's just another tedious person who claims to know which feelings are "better" (for whose benefit?) …
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:25 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 08:22 PM
5

Self defense is a human right, not a female right.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:51 PM
1

I'm less familiar with southeast asia, but I would be very surprised if men in those countries are inclined to whistle and hoot.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:50 PM
–

If feminism is what losing looks like, how do we get some of it for ourselves? "Feminism is losing." Yes, this we hear from time to time, usually from younger men or others, propelled by the vapor emanating from their own gonads. No, feminism is not losing. Liars, feminists are. Damseling shitheads, they are. Horrible human beings, modern feminists are. But they are not losing. The MRM would be fortunate to be as "unsuccessful" as the modern feminist movement. I would be very pleased to be that …
/r/MensRights19/06/16 03:55 PM
3

Thanks! You too!
/r/MensRights19/06/16 03:49 PM
0

The officer is a complete moron. Boys are MORE vulnerable to sexual predators, because it's so much easier to lead them astray.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 12:06 PM
2

Just don't take any pictures with kids in the frame at a public pool. If women wearing thongs he photographs at the pool are "indecent", then why were they allowed to stay at the pool when he wasn't? But I get your point. Cultural bigotry abounds in courts and elsewhere.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 12:04 PM
7

Sick fucks.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 06:44 AM
1

Anyway, bottom line, I think it would be horrible as fuck to be stuck married to someone who hates your guts, but sucks the blood out of you just the same. There is no reason to keep two people who don't want to live together legally hitched. Maybe a better solution is keep divorces, but to reform the court system to be more balanced between males and females, and for the state not to recognize subsequent marriages to anyone but the father (or mother) of the children of the marriage, until all t…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 06:21 AM
1

"The only time anyone ever tells a guy to 'be a man' is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest." It sounds like this article was written by a wishful-thinking caveman who sincerely believes that if only the law didn't allow people to divorce, then he'd still be fucking his former wife and mother of his kids in his marital bed. Fat fucking chance. And why would any reasonable man want to stay married to a woman who generally loathes him, yet takes ad…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 06:12 AM
–

Doesn't happen in other East Asian cultures either.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 05:57 AM
–

Hire a lawyer and inquire. Big mistake cavorting with a work colleague, but you did nothing wrong that she didn't also do.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 05:55 AM
–

Ten bucks say there are a half dozen women at that pool with nearly the same swim bottom nearly every day. He should get photo evidence, then sue.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 05:53 AM
1

Neochivalry should also be dead. So, this vlogger has a more "traditional" sort of relationship with his girlfriend. I suppose this means he views himself as a chivalrous protector of some sort. As an anti-chivalrist, my response is: whoopdee do. I don't give a crap what other people do in their relationships. If a guy wants to lick a woman up the crack of her butt for seven days straight, then get himself shot in the gut in her "honor" on the eighth, to me, that's just a cautionary tale. But th…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 09:22 PM
1

Some women think everything is about them.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:47 PM
2

I remember in high school it was fairly common for some girls to pass you notes talking about everything they were going to do with you, then when the time came, they would do nothing. In other words, they were sexual harassers. You snap a photo of it, and e-mail it to the school principal. Or the whole world. I never heard of a rape in my high school, but it still put them in vulnerable position that I don't think they understood. Stop trying to protect women with your hero complex. They don't …
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:23 PM
–

but the reason I think this doesn't happen in China, its because they have made a huge education effort because of their communist thinking, No. It doesn't happen in Japan either. Or Korea. Or anywhere else in the far east. Of course, women don't often dress like skanks there either, so that may have a little to do with it.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 08:42 AM
–

And?
/r/MensRights18/06/16 08:25 AM
2

If your concern is losing friends, who gives a crap? Those people would be shitty friends / relatives you don't really need anyhow. But there are other things to be concerned about.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 08:19 AM
1

Facebook. Meetup.com. Posters. Hand out business cards.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 08:17 AM
1

The OP sounds suspiciously like he's invoking chivalry culture in his argument, as if the only way he feels it's appropriate to support civil liberties, is by claiming that "women will suffer most" (a.k.a. "women are the primary victims of war"). Such an argument is convoluted and unnecessary. Furthermore, I don't know why the OP assumes that feminists care what effect it has. Feminism is a grievance industry. Grievance is the fuel that propels feminism forward, so for them, the more female suff…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 07:50 AM
–

Actually, people can exit sex at any point they want. However, once consent is reasonably inferred, it's up to the person wanting to terminate the activity, to conclusively and clearly communicate their will to terminate the activity or not go forward. It is not sufficient to simply lay there, assuming that everyone is capable of reading their inapparent change of mind. Otherwise, the very premise of criminalizing or punishing the behavior is insane. It makes nearly as much sense to criminalize …
/r/MensRights18/06/16 07:47 AM
2

LOL They're not "waking up" to anything that doesn't involve their own selfish interests. Nor will they ever.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 05:11 AM
1

Probably not the correct one, but... https://www.thefire.org/justice-101/
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:29 AM
–

Tell her she needs to move to more modest digs. Share the pain. If legal in your state, always be recording. Look up single party vs dual party consent.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:13 AM
2

Damseling shitheads!
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:12 AM
3

I love my kids, but I also don't blame you.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:09 AM
2

Here here.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 04:09 AM
1

The economist is worse than toilet paper, and a source of some of the most ignorant reporting in journalism. They might as well shut that thing down.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:47 AM
1

You should talk to your parents about filing a lawsuit. In the US, there are multiple points of fling complaints. These could include, department chair, principal, superintendent, school board, parent teacher association, county board, federal office of civil rights (OCR). In the UK, the various points of complaint will have different names. It is important that as many males as possible file complaints to create a paper trail of people and institutions refusing to address their issues. What hap…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:44 AM
–

Stay away from recreational drugs. They will not improve your situation. In fact, they may be responsible for it.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:40 AM
0

Sexist bigotry in government sentencing. Absolutely vile. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:34 AM
1

If legal in your state, always be recording. Divorce may be a good idea, but remember that unless you can navigate obtaining primary physical custody, you will be treated poorly. If you rely on the system to provide a fair outcome with a minimum of effort, things will not go your way. You will need overwhelming evidence in favor of custody and work hard in order to get it. In some cases, it may not even be possible.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 02:34 AM
1

Anyone who ever cooperated during a sexual assault because they were threatened with a knife, a gun, or with blackmail. Anyone who could have escaped a sexual assault by jumping off a ten story balcony, but who lived to tell what happened instead. Anyone who was ever raped but who chose not to engage in a major melee involving kicks to the groin, black eyes and a lost tooth. What were you looking for? Some kind of survey were respondents fill in little bubbles on a piece of paper? People lie on …
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:10 PM
1

I doubt the conclusion will be any different on appeal, but that's his right to ask for one.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:53 PM
–

Well, ostensibly a person who knowingly self-intoxicates and consents to be fingered should not be allowed to withdraw that consent after the fact. However, according to California law, someone who is conscious but extremely intoxicated may be considered "incapacitated" even though conscious (and even participating?) and that is what the jury found. Not saying I agree that it is appropriate to throw someone in jail for that, but that's what the law in California already says and what the jury fo…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:26 PM
1

I have a very healthy relationship.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:14 PM
1

Bummer. Yeah, a can of mace would be a reasonable option. My child would never be out alone in the middle of the night in midtown Manhattan at 15 years old. I feel bad that your parents were crap and that a shitty person raped you.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:13 PM
–

Hate to break it to you - but not all women are like that. I'm sorry to break this to you, but I think you might hate women. It only seems that way, because you are accustomed to only hearing criticisms about men, and not women (benevolent sexism). "We live in a matriarchal society. Most of our citizens are females. Can we afford to remain blinded to [inherent traits] of most of our citizens? A study of the.. female is long overdue. We must learn to recognize and deal with her... There is no oth…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:29 PM
–

WHERE is the accountability on the girls part? Sounds like she made a mistake and drank herself unconscious. Not very responsible, but people can't go around assaulting unconscious people.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:12 PM
2

If you are having suicidal thoughts, you need to go to an emergency room immediately. If it is a larger place, they may even have a specific psychiatric emergency room. An Emergency room is open 24/7. You can walk in any time. Any psychiatrist who gets a call from someone who is his patient in the middle of the night who is crying and experiencing suicidal thoughts, and who doesn't immediately refer that patient to an Emergency Room, is probably engaging in medical malpractice. He should probabl…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:05 PM
–

I think it's a great idea to carry a rape whistle or mace. I wish I had had one on me when I needed one. A can of mace I can understand. I might carry a can of mace myself. The whistle? Not so much, unless you're cheering for your favorite team. What happened? Did someone snatch that ridiculously expensive bag-like thing your boyfriend sometimes carries around for you? Like he's your pack mule?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 11:42 AM
–

Things left out: She is a self-proclaimed feminist. She thinks women are special. She thinks it's your job to do X. She carries a mental list of things that "good boyfriends do." She wants her future husband to be her "best friend." She carries a rape whistle. She expects you to do the things that she's frightened to do herself. She believes or acts as if women are exposed to greater danger than are men. She drinks irresponsibly or gets drunk. She does ridiculous things, then brushes them off as…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:37 AM
1

Sick.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:25 AM
1

No, feminists really are like that.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:22 AM
1

Dave said his former wife sent him some x-rated photos of herself telling him she was "embracing her body." In other words, his ex wife is a deviant fuck and a sexual harasser. If anyone should have been charged with "cyberbullying", it should have been her. In a vitriolic email exchange days later, she claimed he had threatened to send the pictures to other people. He accepted some of his messages were "not nice" but vehemently denied any allegation he had been threatening... Now the alleged cy…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:18 AM
2

CNN is pretty horrible in terms of anti-male bias.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:58 AM
1

It could have been considered unlawful sex with a minor, depending on what transpired and depending on the jurisdiction. Strictly speaking not rape though. From my general impression (I'm no lawyer), it seems like the term "statutory rape" has been quite nearly retired from the legal lexicon and replaced with more sensible terminology. I'm pretty sure every state has some law about it though ages may vary. Sure, these things happen. And lots of times, prosecutors and police will look the other w…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:53 AM
–

Depends what state, but possibly not. That's why states and countries have borders. However, you have to also consider that in some states it may be considered a crime to transport a minor out of state jurisdiction for some purposes (such as having sex). There may be circumstances also where Federal law kicks in once minors are moved across state borders. Then, if it's a circumstance that normally requires parental permission, it might be considered kidnapping (depending on the circumstances, la…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:34 AM
–

Why are your state laws morally better than mine? Ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law. If you're fucking teenie boppers, you're a liar if you say you didn't know it was a good idea to find out what the law is in the applicable jurisdiction before trying it out. Why is the speed limit 65 in some jurisdictions, but 70 in others?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:31 AM
1

I'm not a lawyer, but my guess is that California, if the age difference is three years or less, then it's a misdemeanor. It's only a felony if there is more than three years age difference. At least, that's my non-legal impression. So anyone under that age is a rapist You mean a rape victim? As I just told you, if there is "consent" from the minor, then it's called unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor. The law doesn't consider it a rape. Rape is defined differently in California law.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:27 AM
–

Jump off a bridge then. Nothing's stopping you. But you wouldn't. Because most logical people would rather be raped than be disemboweled. That's why, when confronted with the option of being raped or killed, most everyone chooses the option of being raped. Yet another phony chivalrist narrative debunked.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:02 AM
3

What's with all the weirdo trolls around here recently.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:59 AM
2

What the hell does that have to do with anything? That's a pretty sick thing to say. Why would you believe that?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:58 AM
–

In California, it's called, "Unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor." "Statutory rape" is just a lay term.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:58 AM
–

You don't get the difference between a minor and an adult? That's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:53 AM
–

I prefer the term "pederast."
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:51 AM
1

Yeah, so she's a pederast.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:50 AM
–

Due to lesser brute strength, once a prisoner is stripped of their weapons, a woman would be in much more danger than a man, especially if a man is the captor. Ridiculous. A unarmed POW, when confronted by captors carrying knives and and guns, basically is completely neutralized as a combatant. There are no options. It makes no difference whatsoever, whether male or female. If the captors want to filet him open alive, saw through his neck through with a sharp blade, or drown him in a cage, there…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:43 AM
–

The judge did not immediately make a decision regarding whether Himmelspach will be required to register as a sex offender. He set a hearing for Aug. 3 to consider arguments from Himmelspach’s attorney, Grady Davis, and prosecutor Jennifer Bennett. Good god, is there anyone who should register as a sex offender?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:07 PM
3

B-b-b-but we need to close down women's prisons! Prison doesn't "benefit" wee wittle wimmins who rape, maim and murder! Good god, our culture is so daft.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:05 PM
1

“Deep down I feel these things are real and they still feel real to me,” said Marchand. Screw your feelings, lady. If a woman can lie about being raped when no-one else is in her house, do you think it's possible, just possible that's she's capable of lying about how she "feels"? If a woman can "feel" she was sexually assaulted afterwards when there was no one else even in the same house -- imagine what a woman is capable of "feeling" after she's had consensual sex. Another day, another damselin…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 09:43 PM
1

Here is your course prospectus. Pay particular attention to the unit on 'pH'. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/85spp.html
/r/MensRights16/06/16 09:35 PM
0

I recommend he leave his door open. If his child has needs, come visit. And be taken care of. You're right. It doesn't have anything to do with his "fucking ex."
/r/MensRights16/06/16 09:23 PM
–

There is no reason anyone should be forced to pay someone else to do what they would much rather be dong themselves. If someone refuses to take care of their children in their own home, by all means, make them pay. But if they're a competent parent and they are prevented from caring for their own children by an ex or by a court, then no, I see no reason why they should pay anything.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:21 PM
0

Everyone across the whole planet should do this.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:19 PM
–

Because acid is only "real acid" if it's thrown on a woman, dummy!
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:15 PM
2

Globally, acid attacks on men are actually slightly more frequent than acid attacks on women.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:14 PM
1

Sexist pigs.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:13 PM
1

I don't know. Did the London Mayor ban photos of ugly or obese women as well?
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:12 PM
2

Of course they[re not. We live in a matriarchal shithole.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:12 PM
–

Sorry, mistyped... As long as it's not an excuse to NOT teach men's rights to young men...
/r/MensRights16/06/16 07:08 PM
4

Well what do you think I'm going to do? Get myself shot running out among flying bullets to try to prevent deranged white knights from doing their white knight shtick? What would that be? A white knight for white knights? A meta-white knight? A super white knight? But in fact I am doing what I can to prevent people who are white knights from dying -- by telling them to cut it out with their ridiculous pandering chivalrist shtick. I'm telling them not to be white knights for wee wittle wimmins, w…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:35 PM
–

Oh shut up. Just because humans are sexually dimorphic is no reason for the law to discriminate. Just imagine all that white knight hood in the middle of a war? I'm hoping all the white knights will therefore be the first to die, leaving only the normal ones. I also think some of the points are true, female pow's could potentially be treated worse etc They could also be treated better. More likely that, I think.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 01:42 PM
5

how can you not come to the conclusion that your parents love your sister a SHIT TON more than they love you? They probably do. Unfortunately, it's condoned. That society as a whole really doesn't give a fuck about you or your welfare? Unfortunately, society really doesn't give a fuck. Courtesy, nyphotropism.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 01:38 PM
3

Because being a chivalrist dipshit gets people elected. What has been going on for centuries, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 01:36 PM
3

Here is Clinton as Senator voting for war in Afghanistan: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00281 Here is Clinton as Senator voting for war in Iraq: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237 Here is the military intervention in Libya supported / orchestrated by Clinton as Secretary of State: https://archive.is/xv3T1 Here is Hillary Clinton as Secretary of St…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 06:23 AM
5

I hate Hillary too, but it's stupid to lay all the blame at the feet of one senator for everything that ever happened. In the United States, the responsibility and power for declaring war rests solely with Congress. So who else then, except for people who voted in Congress? And nobody is laying all the blame at the feet on one senator. She voted for it. What makes you think she would decide anything differently if she were President? "In the United States, Congress, which makes the rules for the…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:10 AM
–

Why are so many scientists and researchers misandrists? Also, recognize that scientists as individuals are not particularly reliable sources of information, except (sometimes) as it relates to their very narrow field of study. A lot of scientists may believe in 99 out of 100 completely cockamamie and ridiculous things, but become famous only because of the 1 thing out of 100 that they discovered that turned out to be important. That's why the sciences are lumped together with "liberal arts." Sur…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:41 AM
1

Many are nerds who have experienced jealousy and derision towards those who were more traditionally masculine when they were young. Plus, scientists are overly bookish, and tend to believe most things they read / hear. A lifetime of kissing up to teachers often leads to credulous behavior in adopting prevalent views expressed from within academia, even when credulity is not deserved. Similarly, many scientists read scientific journals that are written to relatively high standards, and they mista…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:29 AM
1

I think there was a big influx of morons recently when one of our posts went mainstream.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:24 AM
1

Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:23 AM
1

Probably should just tear it it down and start from scratch.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:22 AM
1

Wow. That's a load of bull. Remove more people like that.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:21 AM
2

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:19 AM
2

Milo says those kinds of things, though, because it makes him look generous and morally superior to the idiots, once they've made the decision to interfere. It's part of the damage control, but I'm sure he'd rather have the mic and the floor than be looking for a silver lining for his speaking engagement. Actually, no. I'm sure he'd be delighted to engage those fools in open debate.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:09 AM
2

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 04:05 AM
3

What a stupid thing to say. Which wars did any current presidential candidate start as commander in chief? Iraq (as Hillary Clinton was Senator). Libya (as Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State). http://reason.com/archives/2016/06/09/dont-let-hillary-clinton-off-the-hook-fo
/r/MensRights16/06/16 01:18 AM
–

Was it funny?
/r/MensRights15/06/16 09:00 PM
2

B-b-b-but close down women's prisons!
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:59 PM
1

Gynosycophant neochivalrist horseshit dreamed up by knuckle-dragging dimwits.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:57 PM
1

Probably will be used as an opportunity to abuse young men with all sorts of lies and omissions.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:56 PM
13

Yes, it is.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:55 PM
–

Sexist drivel.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:54 PM
–

Good. Let's make sure she drafts them for combat also, in case she starts another one of her ridiculous wars.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:53 PM
1

However, does Men's Rights Movements also create divergence and conflicts within societies? IF That were true, so what? Is the best way to counter feminism not using MRMs, but rather a completely different political ideology that focuses on something else with gender equality being built-in? No. That just sounds like neochivalrist bullcrap.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:51 PM
1

Civil disobedience should be encouraged.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:50 PM
1

Whatever they do, do it ten times worse.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:49 PM
0

LOL. White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:47 PM
4

Pathetic.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:39 PM
1

I think people are fully fed up with worrying about what other people think.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 03:57 PM
–

Yeah, but it's funny to watch Gavin McInnes tear down the feminists narrative, which is, frankly, no better. A healthy pro-male narrative for a commercial would have a bunch of guys getting off a sinking ship first, refusing to die in a fire to save a woman about to be enveloped in flames, refusing to lift a heavy bag full of useless shit for a female, doing something he enjoys instead of watching over a female's runts that aren't his just so she can get her hair done, or refusing to get his gor…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 06:07 AM
2

Gavin is brilliant. I don't always agree with everything he says, but practically speaking, he's right, and that commercial was awful. It's funny to watch Gavin McInnes tear down the feminists narrative, which, frankly, is no better than the paleoconservative one, despite being absurdly long in the making. A healthy pro-male narrative for a commercial would have a bunch of guys getting off a sinking ship first, refusing to die in a fire to try to save a woman about to be enveloped in flames, ref…
/r/MensRights15/06/16 05:57 AM
1

The guy is such an antiquated white knighting sexist rube -- his head must be completely filled with rocks by now.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 05:55 AM
1

That male newscaster is a smug white knighting chivalrist sexist dimwit. You can see his metaphorical knuckles drag along the ground as he speaks.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 05:47 AM
1

Let's see it passed. Should be the status quo in every state.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 05:36 AM
1

He ought to be like... "Well thank god I won't be having to sleep with that disgusting whale for another three weeks."
/r/MensRights15/06/16 05:31 AM
2

Drop that woman like a bad disease. Shes gross, too.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:37 AM
24

a
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:37 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:35 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:17 AM
4

a
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:17 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:12 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights15/06/16 01:11 AM
–

Eh, feminism much?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 11:58 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 09:20 PM
0

OK... then leave.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:12 PM
2

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:43 PM
0

True. But does it have a heck of a lot to do with him if he will never interact with the fetus, and if a child will not be born anyway?
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:34 PM
0

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:33 PM
-4

aa
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:18 PM
0

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 01:00 PM
-5

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:59 PM
20

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:58 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:49 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:29 PM
3

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:28 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:26 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:12 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:09 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:07 AM
1

Silly.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:05 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:01 AM
–

Not once you're dead. Check your chivalry. Your excuses are lame.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:59 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:58 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:57 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:55 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:54 AM
–

If you die, you're still dead. By the way, your entire body eaten away by a painful, nerve-eating cancer is not a very pleasant way to go. You should check it out some time. See what that's like.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:50 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:47 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:45 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:00 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:57 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:51 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:49 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:48 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:44 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:42 AM
0

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 03:38 AM
0

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:42 AM
0

a
/r/MensRights14/06/16 12:41 AM
4

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 08:34 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 05:48 PM
0

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:41 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 05:06 AM
-1

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 05:02 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 05:00 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:53 AM
–

Well, male breast cancer is extremely rare. Next time, bring up prostate cancer. But fundamentally, you're right.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:48 AM
10

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:45 AM
4

a
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:41 AM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights13/06/16 01:39 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:41 PM
2

... based on what it is, rather than an ideological perspective that is divorced from reality.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 07:37 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:16 PM
2

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:44 AM
4

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:44 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:42 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:39 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:37 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 11:31 AM
1

An fascinating read and an interesting perspective! Sorry I made it here too late. Looking forward to your future contributions as well.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:42 AM
2

The most common form a matriarchy takes: http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/037/099/i02/african-lion-pride.jpg?1361809335 Notably unrepresented: other males.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:39 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:36 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:19 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:15 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:12 AM
–

Modern feminism operates according to the adage, "what's yours is mine and what's mine is mine too." Misandry is a nearly mandatory feature of the modern feminist movement. So you are entirely wrong. Modern feminism is what it is, not what you and others proclaim it to be.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:10 AM
–

Modern feminism is a female supremacist movement. Like the Aryan Brotherhood, with bras.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:07 AM
2

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 09:34 AM
1

If true, that is not a violation of human rights. By definition according to state laws, some crimes require intent, others not. Along similar lines, first degree murder in most states requires premeditation, second degree murder does not.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 02:56 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:42 PM
1

That's just ridiculous. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 07:54 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights11/06/16 07:52 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:50 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:49 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:44 AM
-1

a
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:39 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:39 AM
3

God forbid, a man might have a low maintenance and supportive presence in his life.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:37 AM
1

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:36 AM
1

Another day, another entitled white twat.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:34 AM
2

Ridiculous gynosycophant grandstanding. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:34 AM
10

They already are.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:32 AM
1

The title of the original paper is, "Moral Chivalry: Gender and Harm Sensitivity Predict Costly Altruism." The title ought to have been, "Immoral Chivalry: Gender and Harm Sensitivity Predict Costly Altruism." Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:24 AM
3

You would think feminists such as these would be in favor of sex bots given their attitudes towards men.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:14 AM
2

Oh please will friggin' Jezebel be eradicated from the face of the planet because of this.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:13 AM
1

Go for it!
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:11 AM
2

Which just goes to prove, "The only time anyone ever asks a guy to be a man, is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest." Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:09 AM
1

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:09 AM
1

Has a bigger lie ever been told?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:07 AM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:07 AM
1

What I've been saying for years and years. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:07 AM
3

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:34 PM
1

a
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:23 PM
3

a
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:12 PM
3

Throw them both in the clink.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:51 PM
14

WHAT! HE ACTUALLY LOST THIS CASE???????? I was amazed that this woman ever even won the ruling that allowed her to sue the guy in the first place. But I assumed the lawsuit could only fail. Have people gone utterly mad? Who is the shithead judge that passed down this ruling? He must be a complete douche. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet. Is the appeal process exhausted on this case too?? Utterly ridiculous.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:34 PM
1

Well that challenges another one of the possible lies that I've accepted. LOL same boat here. And I consider myself a skeptical person when it comes to these things!
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:45 PM
4

That's exactly what it is!
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:35 PM
1

d
/r/MensRights10/06/16 09:04 AM
2

That's all nice, except also in criminal sentencing there is MUCH more discrimination against males as defendants than there is against defendants on the basis of race. https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx The author also forgot to point out the hypocrisy of liberals pushing for softened sentencing of female criminals: http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/27/opinions/hillary-clinton-women-and-mass-incarceration-crisis/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteveryt…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:49 AM
–

If you rely on Brock's testimony that he finger-banged her then you also have to rely on his testimony she gave verbal consent for it. Well, no not really.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:34 AM
1

Well, he can't be blamed for defending himself as best as possible in court. What he did was awful, and the sentence was too short for the severity of the crime. What's more puzzling to me, is you have feminists in the UK advocating for closing women's prisons entirely, and a US presidential candidate saying that women need to be treated with greater clemency in sentencing, and somehow these same people are horrendously outraged by the fact that the kid received a shorter than usual sentence. Wh…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:33 AM
3

So sorry to hear... ... hope you are coping as well as you can.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:30 AM
2

Good deal.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:29 AM
3

a
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:57 AM
22

This woman is a violent and dangerous criminal. Mr Andrews was arrested and taken away from the flat they shared This man was detained and arrested. Hers was a violent crime committed using police as a proxy instrument. Her victim was handcuffed -- a violent crime of assault and battery (by proxy). Her victim was detained -- a violent crime of false imprisonment (by proxy). She attempted to have him jailed for a long period of time.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:54 AM
–

After much discussion, since we now know that the accused admitted to fingering the woman while she was on the ground, basically this case comes down to, is it plausible that someone lies down behind a dumpster and consents to being fingered, then almost immediately passes out, while not legally incapacitated? I'm going to go out on a limb and say, in accordance to current law at least, the jury, at least generally speaking, reached the correct conclusion. Certainly, in terms of outcome (sentenc…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:13 AM
–

But, the real reason it does not mean anything is because he admitted to fingering her, which by law almost the same as inserting your penis. It's discussed elsewhere in this thread, but the general consensus is that, in California (in contrast to some other states), fingering is not considered rape. Hence, the two charges, "sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object" and "sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object." The foreign object, apparently, was…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:45 AM
–

You mean the one "assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated/unconscious person" charge, one of the three charges of which he was convicted? I don't know either. I guess California law only requires that he (a) assaulted her and (b) intended (attempted?) to have intercourse with her, not that he knew it was a crime when he did it. Much like a drunk person trying to break into a store - all that's required is to establish that he intended to break the glass (e.g. it wasn't an accident),…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:30 AM
1

And the law sais that a will-full intoxication does not excuse a crime nor is it a midigating circumstance. You're absolutely correct. No man or women should leave the house thinking "if i drink i'll get raped, if i walk alone i'll get beat up,". You're absolutely correct there too. However, a man or woman SHOULD leave the house thinking: "If I drink to excess, I may end up disinhibiting my behaviors, I may do things that I later end up regretting. People who get drunk sometime end up getting in…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:03 AM
2

Plenty of people get drunk without getting sexually assaulted, just because she drank does not mean what happrned to her is her fault. You're talking about a hypothetical person ("she") who self intoxicates, then chooses to have sex. Nothing is her fault. Nobody said anything was her fault. Just because a court refuses to convict someone for having sex, doesn't mean that the formerly self-intoxicated person is at fault, for anything. Hypothetically, all that states, is that some sexual activity …
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:50 AM
–

I wonder whether his defence considered arguing his drunkenness obviated intent or even any understanding on his part that she was blacking out intermittently or progressively. That would not be an effective defense. Self intoxication is hardly ever an excuse for criminality. They would apply a reasonable person test -- whether a reasonable (e.g. sober person) would have known. P.S. Black out is still conscious, but with memory loss. Unconscious is something different. It appears from reports th…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:46 AM
–

My bad, I was really asking if someone saw his penis -- not if someone saw the outline of a possible erection of a penis through his pants. As I said elsewhere, if he had exposed his penis during the assault, which there is no indication to my knowledge that he did, that might have been meaningful. But an erection seen through pants means zip, nada, nothing. Yes, five minutes after the officer received the call, and an unknown number of minutes after the alleged assault, an officer said he thoug…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:33 AM
1

Maybe big boogers. But you'd actually have to - you know - do a study to actually find out. And in case you have a big nose; no, I'm not taking your word for it.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:52 AM
1

You're right! I'd speculate that there are shared phylogenetic roots between the sneezing reflex that happens when you get something up your nose, and ejaculation. Plus, you know what they say about big noses.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:38 AM
–

Try it. Recruit ten girls and have them rub it in the dirt, then look with a speculum and a magnifying glass afterwards. The probability might be higher if it's lubricated and you wiggle / walk around for a couple hours afterwards. Why assume in a trial if it can be so easily tested? Just because people are squeamish? Seems like not a good reason. I don't have a vagina, but I know from experience getting my face planted in the dirt that the probability of getting dirt inside the mouth is pretty …
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:26 AM
1

Anyone who pursues special privileges for women cannot be a feminist. They do it all the time. Almost all of them.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 01:58 PM
1

d
/r/MensRights09/06/16 08:09 AM
3

feminism [fem-uh-niz-uhm] noun the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men. rolls eyes
/r/MensRights09/06/16 08:07 AM
6

Sexist pigs, damseling shitheads and gynosycophant carpet-lickers. The world always has had too many of them.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 07:51 AM
1

Attorneys who defend alleged rapists are not villains, but there has to be a way to make the legal system less awful for survivors. Maybe someday functional MRI scanners can solve the problem by rooting out truth from fiction. Until that time, we're stuck with doing things the old fashioned way. And until that time, the only thing that is going to make things better for "survivors" is to temper expectations for the judicial system, and to quit sensationalizing individual stories for the purposes…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:47 AM
1

Good judge. Let's hope she gets a very long sentence. "According to attorney Bruce Skaug, Lieteau on one occasion had sex with a 15-year-old in the nurse's office while another employee acted as a lookout." Who was that other employee?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:36 AM
0

Ridiculous. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:32 AM
1

Geeez. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:31 AM
6

Good for him.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:30 AM
–

At this point in Russia there are mothers bribing officials to get their sons conscripted, because it is a good deal. Cite a source for that. Because the economy has gone down recently? These articles state otherwise: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2015-08-25/russias-conscription-conundrum https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/2015-11-09/russians-dodge-bullet Even if it's true, all that proves is that there is never any shortage of ridiculous mothers.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 06:07 AM
1

No, they don't. Feminism by definition pursues equal rights. I don't care what a feminist's dictionary definition of their own movement is. All I care about is what they do, as a group, politically and sociologically. Feminism is what it is, not what they say they are. You look at the coursework they teach in college courses. You look at their positions on various issues as they seek to influence the political system. That defines what they are -- not what is stated or said by some foolish idiot…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:42 AM
1

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on Earth. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:49 PM
2

Silly. Except for the part about drawing wangs on people's faces. People shouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:05 PM
1

Grabbed (and struck?) her arm in an airport. I think the complaint was from someone other than the girlfriend. It's possible there was more that was never reported, but people will probably never know. What's the old canard? "There is no excuse for violence against women!" (Not even self defense?) https://www.tmz.com/2016/06/07/amber-heard-domestic-violence-arrest-partner-tasya-van-ree/
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:54 PM
–

Well, given that the majority of the planet already believes that Johnny Depp is guilty of domestic violence, I already feel like a radical simply for staking out the position that nobody knows yet what really happened, and may never know what happened.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:37 PM
–

Am I?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:32 PM
5

Very nicely written. From the femitheist even! Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:18 PM
–

At this point,nobody knows what really happened.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:04 PM
2

That's all hearsay. Here's hoping the couple splits as fast as possible and never have to speak to one another again.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:02 PM
1

WTF? Please delete this crap.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:00 PM
2

"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others."
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:44 PM
1

d
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:24 PM
1

d
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:18 PM
1

x
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:04 PM
–

It's not certain that fingering occurred after loss of consciousness. Well, the claim might be, that because dirt and pine needles were found in her vagina on exam, that his fingers were all up there at least once she was on the ground. Of course, I'd wonder if that's possible hours later just from someone just sitting on the ground exposed. And it doesn't mean she was immediately unconscious once on the ground. But it's probably not a good idea to speculate all the evidence the jury did hear in…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:01 PM
–

Oh I get it. Do you mean that, to have been charged with attempted rape (and not rape), the prosecutor would have needed to prove Brock displayed "intent to rape"? Sounds plausible. I'm not a lawyer. http://www.shouselaw.com/attempted-crimes.html
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:55 PM
1

Read what TBFProgrammer told you. Emphasis might employe italics, bold type or underlining. Using quotes means something else altogether.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:49 PM
1

Mr Andrews was arrested and removed from the flat they shared This woman has committed proxy violence. The man was arrested. This means he was assaulted, battered, and falsely imprisoned -- all due to the manipulations of this woman. She's a violent criminal.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:52 PM
-1

Why is 'myth' in quotes?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:47 PM
1

Well, they've been kicking your ass for so long, maybe you should re-evaluate your tactics.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:26 PM
–

Okay, criminal intent then. The penetration of an unconscious person [with a foreign object] charge actually requires this. Where did you read that? Unless he can make a case that the penetration that occurred was an accident, I don't see how it would apply in this case anyhow.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:24 PM
2

Sure, why not? That's also what feminists do.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:42 PM
3

Sigh He was convicted of: assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated/unconscious person sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object Because if that's the case then he should have been charged with rape, too. You need to read about California law. I'm pretty sure that penetration with a finger does not count as rape in California. I have not seen any accounts to suggest that sexual intercourse occurred…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:40 PM
3

By their own standards, that's exactly what it is.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:14 PM
1

x
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:13 PM
1

x
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:05 PM
1

x
/r/MensRights08/06/16 12:01 PM
1

The reality though is that feminists routinely pursue unequal rights and privileges for women, and a majority of feminists support unequal rights and privileges for women.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:53 AM
–

"Did your attorney say some incredulously infuriating, degrading things? Absolutely. He said you had an erection, because it was cold" Is that really what his attorney said? Or did his attorney say something along the lines of, "If he did in fact have an erection, it could have been because it was cold." Without the court transcripts, hard to say. What I did find elsewhere though, was a report that, "The police report noted that when the officer found Turner being pinned down, he appeared to hav…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:45 AM
1

x
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:26 AM
–

them saying he only had an erection because he was cold Where did you read that? Someone saw his penis?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:18 AM
–

Well, I think it's a safe bet that the jury arrived at the correct conclusion in this case. Devil is always in the details, but probably so.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:15 AM
–

they leave the party together and fast forward to two guys finding Brock fingering her unconscious body Where did you read that? I read that the two witnesses saw him "thrusting" on her. I don't recall ever reading that anyone ever witnessed him fingering her. I did read that according to the victim statement, the rape examination found dirt and/or pine needles in her vagina. I guess that would imply that he fingered her while she was on the ground (pretty damning evidence), unless anyone can te…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:04 AM
–

No. Premeditation has nothing to do with it. This case has nothing to do with homicide. It's a rape trial. Besides, killing someone without premeditation is still a crime -- usually either second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, or involuntary manslaughter.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:57 AM
–

Is he appealing? Sounds more like he ought to just serve his time and move on.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:56 AM
–

The principals seem to agree here that everything was fine until she passed out. Not necessarily. I believe he was convicted both of penetrating an unconscious person and an incapacitated person. I think that means the jury believed that he also penetrated her with a foreign object (finger?) when she was conscious but incapacitated. So I don't think the determination was that "everything was fine until she passed out."
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:55 AM
–

So a big issue is simply how drunk and aware he was? No. I'm no lawyer but I believe that the standard is a "reasonable person" standard ("reasonably should have known"). If a reasonable person (read reasonable sober person) would have noticed that she was unconscious, then he would be held accountable for assaulting an unconscious person, even if his drunken state led him to believe that she was conscious. Self intoxication is usually not given a lot of weight as a mitigating factor in the comm…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:51 AM
2

d
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:44 AM
2

If you aren't feminist, you are sexist. In reality, "If you are a feminist, you are a sexist" is closer to the actual truth.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:42 AM
2

I will not die for a woman, not today, not tomorrow, not a thousand years from now. My life is mine and I intend to use it fully. Good for you. I hope some day all men will say this, proudly.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:40 AM
2

Anybody know what is going on with the selective service lawsuit?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:39 AM
3

x
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:31 AM
2

x
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:27 AM
3

The fact that the WHO reports on sexual violence against women, but not men, is itself an act of sexual violence.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:15 AM
1

Never did I think I would become one of those men. Famous last words. Never speak to or respond to her again. If legal in your state, always be recording.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:12 AM
4

That's why, if you attract crazies, it's better to pass on that, and pick out a nice woman who doesn't expect you to ask her out, and ask her out. A lot of guys suffer from poor self esteem from living in a shitty matriarchal culture, so they don't. They just wait for some predatory nutter to run them down. That is a mistake. Plus, it doesn't help that "nice" guys are often afraid to be perceived as "predatory" by the venomous snake pit of vile feminists. Also a mistake. Overall, it's best for a…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:48 AM
1

d
/r/MensRights08/06/16 05:38 AM
2

d
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:06 AM
4

d
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:02 AM
0

Good for him.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:54 AM
5

d
/r/MGTOW08/06/16 03:53 AM
3

Why would a prosecutor care if the 15 year-old doesn't want her punished? He's a clueless little kid.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:49 AM
3

Forbes is full of chivalrous sexist pig douche bags.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:47 AM
8

He should have asked her, "No, but are you asking me this question because you are a sexist?"
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:46 AM
1

I don't think people would feel any better about it if there were no sexual penetration of the female victim. Nor should they.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:38 AM
1

You're last four or five posts have been completely non-substantive. Bye.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:34 AM
0

Of course I'm generalizing. If you think you've encountered an exception, before you stick your dick in the kid, take him to a judge and see if you can convince the judge to declare the kid emancipated. Good luck.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 02:25 AM
0

Yes I am, you're just stubbornly refusing to see it, because it doesn't fit your narrative. Because 14 and 15 year-old kids are idiots, immature, lack self control, knowledge, wisdom, or experience. It is proven fact that their frontal lobes are as yet poorly developed. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3943187 http://www.newsminer.com/opinion/community_perspectives/why-teenagers-take-stupid-risks-the-immature-teenage-brain/article_d06c0148-f918-11e3-8459-001a4bcf6878.html Quit being com…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:36 PM
1

If you let men wear their facial hair the way they want, they might be misguided into thinking they actually have rights.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:31 PM
–

LOL. Well... Not sure if it applies here, but never stick your dick in crazy, no matter what it looks like. It's strange -- there are so many guys who could have their pick of at least a million different women on the planet, and so many of them end up settling down with complete nutters. Chalk it up to low self esteem bludgeoned into them by the ghastly matriarchal culture in which we live.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:22 PM
–

Go away silly bot.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:22 PM
1

This happened two decades ago where you had an hour of recording capability in a device about the size of a small box of tissues They're the secret service. They have stuff. Shoulda done it.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:20 PM
0

In any case, they have sex anyways People most often look the other when kids have sex with each other, because it makes no sense to punish both of them. But it's generally discouraged all the same, and adults are generally thrown in jail when having sex with kids, because kids are stupid and adults should know better. The person being dishonest is you.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:18 PM
0

15 to 17 year olds are kids. There. I did it. Sometimes people call them "young adults" but only when they want to prop up their already over-inflated egos. They don't vote. Half of them can't drive. They can't undergo surgery or get a tattoo without permission from their parents. They are not allowed to move out of the house unless successfully making an argument to be emancipated by a judge; otherwise the police will return them to their parent's home where they belong. Most can't have a credi…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:21 PM
0

True.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:11 PM
1

Yeah, I wouldn't do that. What a bunch of assholes.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:10 PM
1

Liars.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:09 PM
2

Just change rules to let them try out for the men's team. If they can make the cut, they make the team like everyone else. If they can't make the cut, they can always go back to their bigoted women's teams that discriminate against men.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:07 PM
1

Irrelevant. They are still having sex just the same. Irrelevant. Adults who have sex with kids go to jail.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:00 PM
1

Because who gives a fuck what they do in other countries? No, it's not reasonable to have the age of consent sooner, since kids are marrying later, they are spending a longer time in school, the cost of raising children is always increasing (pregnancy you know), it's harder and harder to successfully support a family without long term planning and a thorough education, families (both nuclear and extended) and neighborhoods are less stable, resulting in sparser support networks for wayward kids, …
/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:29 AM
1

Apparently it's not if it's the age of consent in other countries. I don't give a damn what people do in other countries. I don't vote there, and neither do you. It's none f my business.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:53 AM
1

I don't know why men put up with this crap. He's the fucking president - someone should have been recording and thrown her ass in jail. Aren't secret service agents trained to throw themselves in front of the President, tackle and subdue anyone who attacks or threatens him? She should have been laid out on the carpet of the White House with a pile of black suits on top of her, afterwards waking up in a prison cell. Why was she allowed near the President afterwards? She should have been given ins…
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:34 AM
2

x
/r/MensRights06/06/16 07:33 PM
–

If that were true, so what? Tell the narcissists they're narcissists then.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:17 PM
0

There was no concept of "I as a man need to be equal to a woman so this is how I will shape my world view". There surely were. Many became feminists, but their efforts, as always, were never reciprocated.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:51 PM
–

Regardless whether men and women can ever truly be equals, there is no reason why the law should treat them differently. Period. Same applies to race.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:47 PM
1

This said, I'm not against chivalry as a concept. You should be.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:43 PM
2

And her teacher!
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:41 PM
18

I hope Becky gets sued and loses her business.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:32 AM
5

So a male character gets stereotyped in a work of fiction as a murderous asswipe and they have no problem with it? Another day, another bunch of sexist damseling shitheads.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:30 AM
-1

True.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:28 AM
2

Let them try out for the men's teams. If they qualify, they get paid according to skill. If they don't, they can go back to their bigoted teams that discriminate against male athletes.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:23 AM
1

Not unless you were making it up to inflate some numbers on it.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:21 AM
0

Wouldn't fly that airline.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:19 AM
–

Please, no. Whatever it means, I'd rather not have to read it.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:15 AM
1

No, but if he were 20 now, he would set a good example. Somehow I feel like the modern incarnation of Muhammad Ali is, in a way, Donald Trump. I think Ali even fought in some of Trump's casinos. They both talk a lot of smack, speak from the gut, and have a larger-than-life persona that is not always to be taken seriously, and which is often misunderstood. But no, not MRAs.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:14 AM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:09 AM
1

The negative female influence in education can be seen in other ways, like preference for coursework over exams, which girls generally find tougher. This lack of competition in schools, including competitive examinations, has been disastrous for boys. That's exactly it. Plus, the over-emphasis on cooperative "team player" mentality is of no use so long as boys are expected to abide by a sexist, gracious, chivalrist deferential attitude towards "precious" females. My goal is to send my boys throu…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:07 AM
3

... a generation of disaffected and increasingly misogynistic boys. Disaffected yes. "Increasingly misogynistic" in what way? Young men these days are the most hen-pecked and whipped that there ever were.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 06:03 AM
2

x
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:55 AM
4

x
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:53 AM
1

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:45 AM
6

Irrelevant to the question at hand.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:45 AM
–

Bye Ben Shapiro. Don't let the door kick your ass on the way out.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:45 AM
13

Sexist pigs.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 03:39 AM
-1

Ten bucks says the 29 were almost all liars.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 01:56 AM
–

Really? Do you know of specific examples?
/r/MensRights06/06/16 01:52 AM
–

Who cares what they think? Nobody is at ease with being drafted. That's why it's a draft and it's compulsory. You're not supposed to be at ease with it. Once every adult is eligible for conscripted combat duty, we can then have a reasonable discussion about whether anyone should be drafted. The survey found only 40 percent [of women] agreed... along with 61 percent of men, ... so much for the theory that patriarchy has been holding women back from combat. Actually, it's damseling shitheads!
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:48 AM
-2

Daily Mail has some of the best reporting on the internet. Fact-based. Detailed. Not a lot of hot air opinion-based journalism like you will see in the Economist or The NYT. Because who needs opinions from liberal arts majors (journalists) anyways?
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:46 AM
1

Just start all boys schools and see where parents would like to send their kids. I know where I will send mine.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:45 AM
1

It could be like Sweden, which decided to abolish affirmative action because they expressed fears that men might benefit.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:44 AM
2

Too much PC bullshit in schools these days, and subjective grading policies that discriminate against boys. Also, few male advocates, both at home and at school. Most men will not enter the teaching profession anymore because it is a hostile environment where a man is held hostage, walking on pins and needles 24/7 due to a damseling shithead female guard that looks to find reason to for men to be faulted, disciplined, and fired. Women cannot be blamed, so that leaves men.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:42 AM
–

Feminism Murdered Chivalry Chivalry is worth murdering, whether feminism is a thing or not.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 12:32 AM
–

You should sue. If it's legal in your state - look up single party consent - always be recording. If you are in a single party consent state, it was a mistake to confront your boss while you weren't recording.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 09:39 PM
1

I don't really care what toys people play with.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:45 AM
1

d
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:44 AM
1

I just hope Depp and the woman can split as fast as possible, and hopefully never see each other again.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:43 AM
2

z
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:41 AM
1

z
/r/MensRights05/06/16 08:40 AM
1

What a complete fuckoff. Libertarian? Don't vote for the guy -- vote for someone else. Unfortunately, his main competitor is Debbie Dingell, wife of former Congressman John Dingell. If Debbie Dingell at all like her husband, she would also be a complete cunt. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 06:56 AM
0

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet. There is no reason why any man who opens his home to his children to take care of himself at least 50% of the time should be forced to pay anyone anything. Why should you be obligated to pay someone else to do what you would much rather be doing yourself? If they don't like it, they should both give the kids to you, and then send themselves off to work.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 06:53 AM
1

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet. "This decision ensures we reward people in a fair way,..." ... actually it insures just the opposite. UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said there had been "little progress" on the issue There has been "little progress" on the issue because they have had little progress convincing women as an overall group to work for as long hours, and as reliably and consistently as men as an overall group. In that sense, nor s…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 06:50 AM
1

It is grooming indeed.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 06:49 AM
1

Usually there are, but sometimes not. If not, just use the ladies' room.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 06:48 AM
-3

This sentence is ridiculous. assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated/unconscious person sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3623891/Star-Stanford-swimmer-serve-just-six-months-prison-raping-unconscious-woman.html I assume the penetration part he was convicted of was with his fingers (not penis). If the jury found him guilty of those crimes, there is n…
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:47 AM
1

A 13 year old student? I doubt it. But regardless, if they come over here and do it, yes.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:33 AM
1

It's wrong, but it's not rape. Tomato, tomato. Just look up how many years the person gets for the jurisdiction they're in, and call it that.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:32 AM
0

Oh shut up already. A lot of other countries are fucked up places where it is okay to fuck and knock up your 12 year old niece. Doesn't make it okay. Retard.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:31 AM
1

Just because kids who go through puberty often have sexual urges does not make it ok for adults to start fucking with them. Get real.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:29 AM
1

... or just call 'em a pederast. Nobody knows what those other terms mean.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 04:28 AM
1

GOOD.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 03:06 AM
1

True. But that's not what people think it means today!
/r/MensRights04/06/16 12:16 PM
1

Where is the data?
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:55 PM
1

The study sounds like bull crap. Here is a link to it: https://mgmt.wharton.upenn.edu/files/?whdmsaction=public:main.file&fileID=10042 Delve in!
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:42 PM
1

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:12 PM
1

Great news!
/r/MensRights03/06/16 12:11 PM
1

True. Like, right now.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 03:04 AM
1

He should establish legal custody over his child. Find out who the father of the other two children is and set them up with that guy or guys. The other two children may have their names on their birth certificates or somewhere else. If not there, try inquiring with her close friends.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:42 AM
1

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:40 AM
1

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:40 AM
1

Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:39 AM
2

It's possible he did have a say.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:37 AM
139

claiming that she faces panic attacks whenever scheduled court dates arise and that she is too unwell to attend court. Who cares. Try her anyway. Damseling shithead.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:29 AM
0

They most certainly are a deterrent. Just go to any country where having sex with 13, 15 year-olds is completely legal and see what you find out. To say otherwise is complete nonsense.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:26 AM
2

Ridiculous. Prostitutes are businesspeople making money in an industry while acting in a professional capacity. In the transaction between professional and customer (the latter being often clueless), the professional is always held to a higher level of conduct. To say that prostitutes have less culpability in the sex trade than ordinary consumers, is a bunch of complete nonsense. It's the other way around, quite logically. But so it goes with damseling shitheads and their abettors.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 01:15 PM
1

Agree.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:08 PM
0

The law is the way it is for very good reason. Fourteen is much too low. Those countries haven't kept up with the times.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 06:07 AM
0

Irrelevant whether the kid liked it. The 20 year-old should have been charged.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:59 AM
1

Uh, in case an adult has any plans to fuck a 13 year old and whisper a bunch of bullshit in his ear about getting married or whatever other bullcrap, it would be best to assume the kid will be future damaged goods. Even if you were Sigmund Freud, you would not be able to predict. Which means you don't fucking do it, dumbo. Just like you don't share you coke and heroin with the kid either. Sure, it's possible the kid doesn't end up a future drug addict, but what are the chances?
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:24 AM
1

Jail is deterrence.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:21 AM
1

Who cares? Irrelevant. He's 13. Therefore, stupid.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:20 AM
1

A 13 year old who gets to bang his smoking hot teacher will carry it around like a badge of honor with his boys for the rest of his life and will get high fives all around Who cares? Irrelevant. He's 13. Kids get high fives for doing all sorts of stupid things. Like doing drugs, for example. A 13 year old girl will feel vulnerable and ashamed and feminists will never let her forget that she has been abused as a child no matter how hard she tries. Who cares? Irrelevant.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:20 AM
2

Lucky kid, I wish I was him. Who cares? Irrelevant. He's 13. The kid loved it and is bragging about it to his boys. Who cares? Irrelevant. He's 13. The teacher has some mental issues and needs to get help. Who cares? Irrelevant. He's 13. This kid doesn't need to be treated like a damaged rape victim. Who cares? Irrelevant. He's 13. He needs to be given a high five and a pat on the back for being a man. No, he doesn't. He's 13, got a woman pregnant, and almost ruined his life.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:17 AM
0

OK then. She's a pederast.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:15 AM
6

Doesn't matter what you would have liked. A lot of kids would like to eat candy bars for breakfast, lunch and dinner, too.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:13 AM
2

He's a child. It's not anyone's place to assume how it will affect him in 1, 10, 20, 50 years. Assume the worst. And even if you don't assume the worst - which you should -, it's still reckless endangerment of a 13 year-old.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:10 AM
–

minimum sentence of 25 years... you think longer is appropriate? That depends on what is alleged to have happened. If the sex at any point throughout the relationship was coerced or forcible, that would be forcible rape of a 13 year old. Then, 25 years or more should not be out of the question. If it is a case of statutory rape of a child of 13... Thirteen is very young. And she is 24, which is more than old enough to know better. I'd say in that case 25 years is only a little bit excessive. But…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 04:07 AM
1

Because I'm not stupid.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:59 AM
1

Gross.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:55 AM
2

No quotes around "romantically involved." The news website has since changed "romantically involved" to "inappropriate relationship", probably in response to complaints.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:55 AM
1

Well, that's not the way it was characterized when describing the events themselves. Also, the news website has edited their article, probably in response to complaints. Go find the original.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:54 AM
1

Good for you. It matters not one iota whether I or anyone else as a 13 year-old would have been ecstatic. I would have had a good time if she had administered me a hit of methamphetamine or opioid too. Doesn't make it right. BTW, she's not hot. She's just wearing a lot of make-up in some of the photos. Not that I care.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:52 AM
0

Oh shut up. I don't really give a crap about her. Putting her in jail is strictly deterrence.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:50 AM
1

I don't care if he or any other kid would have liked it. She could have administered the kid a hit of methamphetamine and he sure would have like it too.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:49 AM
1

That's because you're a desperate thirsty tard.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:48 AM
2

IF that were true, so what? I probably would have tried methamphetamine and loved it too.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:47 AM
1

I don't really give a crap if she truly loved him. But thanks for pointing that out.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:47 AM
3

Hate to break it to you, but if you've been reading the news, the concept of rape is already diminished. I believe most state statutes no longer refer to it as "statutory rape" but rather sexual abuse of a minor of something along those lines. She's being charged with "CONTINUOUS SEXUAL ABUSE OF YOUNG CHILD OR CHILDREN." Matters little. To jail she goes.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:46 AM
–

"Vera said she and the victim 'love each other.' " So she fucked the kid up emotionally as well as sexually. A longer sentence is appropriate.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 01:15 PM
–

Ridiculous. It's statutory rape and child abuse.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 01:12 PM
1

I would totally be parking in those spaces if they had them here. Fuck female entitlement.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 08:17 AM
1

That woman is a loser.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 08:08 AM
1

"Nothing can be a woman's fault, so that leaves men."
/r/MensRights01/06/16 06:34 AM
1

Brilliant The real speak is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcidBo3TIUM
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:56 AM
1

Good. Isn't that statutory rape though and not "an affair?"
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:54 AM
1

Another day, another damseling shithead. Yes Sarah, we get it -- life is so hard for you.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:52 AM
3

"The only time anyone ever asks a guy to 'be a man' is when they are trying to convince him to do something that is not in his best interest."
/r/MensRights01/06/16 05:51 AM
–

They should subpoena the password for the account. Though she may be protected from revealing the password by right against self incrimination. Not sure. The account could be empty. If they were able to subpoena records from Yahoo to find out when the account was accessed, I assume they could have just as easily subpoenaed Yahoo for any e-mails that remained in the account.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:58 AM
1

They don't have one? Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:54 AM
2

d
/r/MensRights31/05/16 06:06 AM
4

What a clueless ignoramus.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 05:59 AM
9

Sexist pigs.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 05:53 AM
3

Right. Jail her. Then deport her.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 10:11 PM
18

Her complaint led to the arrest of a 29-year-old Bangladeshi man So, false imprisonment (by proxy), battery (by proxy). These are violent crimes. She should be deported after time served. Her name should also be made public as a warning to others.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:54 PM
1

Blech.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 02:08 AM
3

We don't think you're a "bad person." We just think your sexual habits are gross and we don't want you around our kids.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 02:06 AM
2

This is great. More dads should be involved in these protests.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 02:02 AM
9

Mark Latham is good guy. The "fellow bloke" is an idiot chivalrist fantasist. Keep jousting windmills, buddy.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 01:58 AM
12

I've never known men's magazines to be as hostile and hateful to the opposite sex as feminist magazines.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 01:53 AM
1

Nice ending. Congratulations!
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:28 PM
1

Cute. I'll check that one out and see if it's appropriate for my boys.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 05:59 AM
5

Let women try out for the men's teams. If they can play as well, let them. There's your gender equality.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 05:17 AM
1

Sexist horseshit.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 05:16 AM
1

True. But also, people are free to do what they want that is consensual. And it's still going to happen, and there is no reason to send anyone to jail.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 05:15 AM
0

They're building robots and AI. Problem solved!
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:54 AM
2

I hope they can split up amicably and never see each other again.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:50 AM
2

Always be recording. Provided she lied: Perjury, making a false report, attempted battery (by proxy), attempted false imprisonment (by proxy). All of these are violent crimes. If proven, a prison sentence would be appropriate. If an adult by law, her name should be released as a warning to the public in dealing with her.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:42 AM
1

Trump seems like a decent guy. It's true what he says, he's a counterpuncher. Most people he has insulted, had it coming. He makes good points about trade and immigration. For all the left's alleged support of labor unions, high wages are not sustainable in the face of borders open to cheap imports from regions where labor conditions and wages are poor, or from unrestrained immigration. Unions make domestic workers less competitive, zero tariffs make domestic workers less competitive, and unrest…
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:54 PM
2

LOL true.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:14 PM
4

Good for him. I hope he wins. Sovereign immunity should be repealed.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:07 PM
1

Feds should only provide guaranteed loans for STEM, business, finance, architecture, healthcare, hospitality, agriculture, veterinary school, dentistry, trade school and similar things. Leave the rest to the free market. Also, engineering grad school should be funded similar to basic sciences grad school.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:18 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 05:10 AM
3

Because feminism is sexist piggery.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:46 AM
2

Good for them!
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:43 AM
2

Why would anyone want to be a man these days? No good reason for that.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 02:42 AM
1

Troll?
/r/MensRights27/05/16 02:06 PM
2

Because we live in a matriarchal shithole.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 06:42 AM
3

Pandering to females. Bleach. This is how women nearly always make off with the good stuff.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 06:37 AM
3

Is a woman considered an under-represented minority?
/r/MensRights27/05/16 06:15 AM
3

If it's legal in your state, follow the mantra "always be recording." Look up whether your state is "single party consent" or requires consent from more than one party. Electronic recording devices can be purchased very cheaply on eBay these days. If legal, record all your interactions with faculty when discussing these things. If it is a single party consent state, you will likely find that you should not need to let them know you are recording. You can actually file a complaint through the Fed…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:44 PM
2

Another day, another damseling shithead.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:42 PM
1

Repeal sovereign immunity.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:37 PM
8

Anita Sarkeesian, the damsel in distress trope.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 11:33 PM
3

Milo is actually very gracious to African Americans, just not the ones who resort to these sorts of bullying tactics. If Milo had interrupted a speaker uninvited in the manner these people did, he would have been arrested. College Republicans should sue the University for not providing security when the security was paid for. (Yiannopoulos) argues that there is no wage gap for women, a difficult position to maintain in light of government data.. The college president is misleading about the wage…
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:01 PM
6

Should wait until women are draft eligible and must register. That way, it's clear that everyone is going to be eligible in case a draft is called. A law that gets rid of the draft frankly is not all that useful, since Congress has to pass a law to implement a new draft anyways. And this law does not and can not prevent Congress from doing that.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 01:57 PM
2

Who is the idiot that gave her $50 for serving food?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 01:49 PM
0

Good for them!
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:32 AM
2

Thanks for your opinion. I think Milo is awesome. You should too.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:30 AM
10

Ridiculous. Ought to be considered a scam.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:29 AM
38

Ridiculous, ought to be considered a scam.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:28 AM
1

I like the sound of that.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:35 PM
2

Who cares, spare us all the drama.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:34 PM
1

Why would anyone want MGTOW to be obsolete?
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:32 PM
2

Basically, yes. Your slavery for their freedom. Feminism is a female supremacist movement founded on the mandate of chivalry, demanded through damseling.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:26 PM
10

Incarcerating fathers who don't get to see their kids: hat tip to the "Deadbeat Parent's Punishment Act" signed into law in 1998. Thanks Bill Clinton! http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/06/24/deadbeat.parents.bill/
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:26 PM
1

Awesome job guys. “They’re not as crazy as they seem,” she said. Nicely understated.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:18 PM
9

White women: the most entitled overall demographic of human beings on the face of the planet. Also the demographic that complains the most.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 09:17 PM
5

You did a good job.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:28 PM
1

Just stay home and watch a movie.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:06 PM
8

Men are dying every day due to discriminatory policies.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 12:36 PM
1

x
/r/MensRights25/05/16 05:31 AM
2

"I was arrested by police, interviewed under caution and kept on bail for almost two months." So, he was physically battered and falsely imprisoned by Eleanor de Freitas, who conducted her violent crime by manipulating police and authorities as her proxy.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:37 AM
1

Can't argue with that.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:35 AM
1

Misandry, usually.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:21 AM
1

a
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:20 AM
2

a
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:20 AM
1

Nothing compared to the ridiculously overpriced products "for women" that women buy all the time.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:16 AM
–

I really have no idea why they would have a problem with Milo. Milo actually supports help for African Americans in a way, just not the manner in which BLM have been conducting themselves.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:14 AM
8

You should. There would be a great need. Others have done so. A few (but not others) have faced great resistance from student unions and powers that be. Ryerson University in Canada has one that is battling with the student union. Here is a list of some from around the world: http://boysmeneducation.com/pro-male-groups-in-academia/ You should contact some of them and find out how to approach things. Also, when approaching administration and student government, if legal in your jurisdiction (look…
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:11 AM
1

Ridiculous lies.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 04:04 AM
7

Milo is the bomb. What a bunch of a-holes.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 03:53 AM
15

Damseling shitheads. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 03:52 AM
76

Will she be sued? Let's hope so.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 03:50 AM
1

x
/r/MensRights25/05/16 03:47 AM
1

It's the opposite really.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 10:48 PM
25

Feminism is a ladies first female supremacist movement run by assholes.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 10:47 PM
4

Of course, fathers spending time with their children is always a MRM issue.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 10:46 PM
3

Some folks are getting an education!
/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:38 PM
1

x
/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:34 PM
11

Feminism is a female supremacist movement. Criticism of women is not permitted.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:26 PM
-1

d
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:21 PM
0

Sexist pigs. Chivalry is demented sexist shit that needs to be razed from the face of the planet.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:21 PM
9

Those are very much an MRM issue!
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:19 PM
–

Jurors evaluate based on the evidence at hand. They should be fully capable of balancing the risks of false accusations with other considerations, and false accusations always have to be taken into consideration as reasonable possibility, no matter what. The concerns they have in saying that kind of crap have nothing to do with the meting out of justice in a fair and assured fashion. Rather, they have everything to do with arriving at a pre-conceived outcome. In case from time to time a guilty p…
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter