TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ThePigman Archive

View 317 posts and 4,938 comments by ThePigman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
382

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:59 AM
336

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:46 AM
305

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/12/12 04:01 AM
253

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/09/12 12:40 PM
247

ThePigman/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:36 PM
227

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/10/12 02:24 AM
217

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/02/12 10:13 AM
214

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:10 AM
207

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:58 AM
203

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:02 AM
198

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:50 AM
163

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/04/13 02:44 AM
159

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/10/12 03:07 AM
152

[Misleading Title]ThePigman/r/MensRights22/08/13 10:52 AM
151

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:32 AM
145

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/12/12 02:12 AM
140

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:08 AM
137

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:23 AM
125

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:43 PM
118

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/03/12 09:17 AM
108

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:38 AM
103

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:09 AM
102

ThePigman/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:09 PM
98

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:45 AM
88

ThePigman/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:47 AM
88

ThePigman/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:03 AM
81

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/11/12 11:18 AM
80

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:45 AM
76

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:14 AM
75

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/10/12 09:55 AM
69

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/02/13 01:35 PM
68

ThePigman/r/MensRights27/06/12 02:16 AM
67

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/02/13 10:34 AM
65

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:18 PM
65

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:18 AM
61

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:28 AM
58

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/08/13 04:54 AM
56

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/01/13 11:37 AM
54

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:09 AM
52

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/06/12 12:43 AM
50

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/10/11 11:21 AM
50

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:04 AM
46

ThePigman/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:20 AM
46

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/11/11 05:24 AM
46

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/01/13 11:45 AM
46

ThePigman/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:34 AM
44

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:06 AM
43

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:29 AM
43

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:58 AM
43

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/12/12 11:35 AM
42

ThePigman/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:06 PM
41

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:54 AM
41

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:04 AM
39

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/07/12 06:07 AM
39

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:14 AM
38

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/01/13 12:00 PM
37

ThePigman/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:52 AM
37

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:46 AM
37

ThePigman/r/MensRights12/12/12 10:02 AM
36

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/07/12 11:03 AM
34

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:34 AM
31

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/08/12 02:47 AM
30

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:21 AM
27

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:27 AM
27

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:57 AM
26

ThePigman/r/MensRights14/07/11 07:36 AM
26

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:36 AM
26

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:06 AM
26

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/11/12 05:50 AM
26

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:20 AM
25

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/04/12 11:39 AM
25

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:22 AM
23

ThePigman/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:12 PM
23

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/07/13 12:56 AM
22

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:00 PM
22

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:44 AM
21

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:45 AM
21

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:18 PM
21

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:33 AM
20

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:06 AM
20

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/10/12 02:38 AM
19

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:17 AM
19

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:57 PM
19

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/09/12 11:08 PM
19

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:46 AM
19

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:15 AM
19

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:18 AM
18

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/10/11 11:59 AM
18

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/06/12 02:35 AM
18

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/11/12 05:47 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:45 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:10 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:55 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/11/11 01:13 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:39 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/11/12 01:59 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:34 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:43 PM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/12/12 10:32 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights06/05/12 03:17 AM
17

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/05/12 01:14 AM
16

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/04/13 01:32 AM
16

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:32 AM
16

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:53 PM
15

ThePigman/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:52 AM
15

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:19 AM
14

ThePigman/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:27 AM
14

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:10 AM
14

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/03/12 12:50 AM
14

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/05/12 07:05 AM
14

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/03/12 05:33 AM
14

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:13 AM
14

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:49 AM
13

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/07/13 01:00 AM
13

ThePigman/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:13 AM
13

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/12/11 04:14 AM
13

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/05/12 01:03 AM
13

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/09/12 02:15 AM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:17 AM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/07/13 01:36 AM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:44 PM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:24 AM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:34 AM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:14 AM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/04/12 01:39 PM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:17 AM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:35 AM
12

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/01/13 01:58 AM
11

ThePigman/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:52 AM
11

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/10/12 10:17 AM
11

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:44 AM
11

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:33 AM
10

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:48 AM
10

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/07/11 02:18 AM
10

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:46 AM
10

ThePigman/r/MensRights02/12/12 11:46 PM
10

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:53 AM
9

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/11/11 02:03 AM
9

ThePigman/r/MensRights12/05/12 02:47 AM
9

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:30 PM
9

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/09/12 03:17 AM
8

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:52 AM
8

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/11/12 03:20 AM
8

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:54 AM
8

ThePigman/r/MensRights19/12/12 10:24 PM
8

ThePigman/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:30 AM
8

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:48 AM
8

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:36 AM
8

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:21 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/12/11 11:06 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:42 PM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/08/12 02:40 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights06/10/11 01:02 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/08/12 01:48 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:12 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:08 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:19 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/05/13 12:30 AM
7

ThePigman/r/MensRights12/12/11 12:50 PM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/12/12 02:14 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:42 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:06 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/12/12 10:30 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:11 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:43 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:15 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights06/08/12 02:11 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/04/12 10:18 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/07/12 02:13 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:18 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:18 AM
6

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/10/11 01:34 AM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/03/13 11:45 PM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:10 AM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/10/12 10:40 PM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights27/09/11 12:43 PM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/01/12 12:37 AM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:32 AM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:39 AM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/06/12 03:33 AM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights12/12/12 11:21 PM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:02 AM
5

ThePigman/r/MensRights14/03/13 01:19 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:21 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/11/12 04:33 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:48 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:24 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:13 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/08/12 12:53 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:16 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:47 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/07/12 01:24 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:43 PM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:58 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights31/03/13 01:45 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:58 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights14/10/12 02:08 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/01/13 01:53 AM
4

ThePigman/r/MensRights31/05/13 12:58 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:59 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/03/13 11:58 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:15 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:37 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:32 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:31 PM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:57 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:40 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:47 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/12/12 11:46 PM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:08 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:41 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/02/12 12:54 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/05/12 12:19 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:58 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:48 AM
3

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:33 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/08/13 02:23 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/02/13 05:39 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:09 PM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights06/10/11 09:39 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:34 PM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:24 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights02/03/13 01:02 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:35 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/05/13 02:18 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:40 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:44 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/10/12 05:42 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:00 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/05/13 03:24 AM
2

ThePigman/r/MensRights12/08/12 08:02 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights28/11/12 03:10 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights14/04/13 02:36 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:18 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:28 PM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:46 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:54 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights06/01/13 02:33 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:51 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/05/13 02:16 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:20 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/10/11 12:55 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/11/11 10:14 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/10/12 05:20 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:02 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights06/05/12 03:26 AM
1

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:51 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:55 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:17 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:10 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/05/12 02:41 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:23 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:15 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:51 PM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/01/12 01:14 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:21 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:37 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/06/12 02:41 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/06/12 12:48 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:04 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:30 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights16/12/11 10:56 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/12/12 12:45 PM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:41 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:39 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/08/13 03:03 PM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/03/12 06:08 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:20 PM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:19 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:05 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:54 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights04/05/12 02:03 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:46 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/12/12 12:13 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:31 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:21 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:18 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:54 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights02/08/11 12:40 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:00 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:28 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/10/12 03:04 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:00 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:56 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:07 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:08 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:19 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:21 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:38 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:50 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights11/11/11 08:57 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:18 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:04 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights09/08/12 06:50 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/11/12 01:39 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:51 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights13/08/12 03:11 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:19 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights20/07/11 11:17 PM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/08/11 12:59 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/02/12 12:08 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:57 PM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/10/12 03:19 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:30 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights22/04/12 05:32 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights08/05/13 11:02 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights25/01/13 05:35 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/11/12 02:15 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights21/06/12 03:01 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:33 PM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:41 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:42 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:52 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:55 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:42 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:01 AM
0

ThePigman/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:41 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,938 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I've been around long enough to know that this is something you do a lot. Says you, new boy. Hey, shouldn't you be hiding under a bridge somewhere?
/r/MensRights06/09/13 06:25 AM
2

Rape culture -- real rape culture -- at work.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 01:54 AM
4

Try hanging around for more than six days, maybe then i will take you seriously.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 01:44 AM
1

Then he would need too Too? What too? You must be mentally ill. Also, not much point in hitting back after you've been shot or knifed. PS U R Dumb
/r/MensRights06/09/13 01:42 AM
1

In this instance you did imply he should chase her down to "defend himself." Didn't even read past that howler. Don't waste my fucking time with childish lies.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 01:40 AM
4

There is nothing wrong with not wanting to harm another human being. There is when you specify that human being's sex. Had this been a five foot man, he probably would have knocked him out.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:07 AM
-5

You are a liar. At no point did i say he should chase her down. Obviously, if she was running away it is unlikely to imply a further attack. You clearly know nothing about how violent people function, have no idea of the "setup" blow. Stay out of the ghettos and trailer parks if you want to stay alive. On the other hand, don't.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:05 AM
-2

Yeah, seriously, knucklehead.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:00 AM
9

I don't think I would notice the difference. I suspect you might -- the bot would be witty and far more creative than the trolls.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:17 AM
3

Your comment has nothing to with men's rights. Please explain why you posted it.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:16 AM
4

See, now i've had to change your tag from "troll" to "third rate troll." Maybe you should go and get some training by trolling something softer, like a celebrity website.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:13 AM
2

I also see these findings as blindingly obvious, but unfortunately the world is full of idiots who will only believe the obvious if it's coming from a scientist of some sort.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:05 AM
3

For that reason, his statement is one of common sense, and not one of "woman worshipping". Yeah, common sense -- that's why he emphasized her sex rather than her size. Your trolling needs work.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:03 AM
5

Well, he didn't NEED to. Really? What if she had followed up with a fingernail to the eye? A punch to the windpipe? A kick to the nuts? And that's assuming she wasn't packing a knife or a gun! No, someone hits you and, be they large or small, you take them down fast. and it lowers you to their level I can't even begin to tell you how sick i am of this idiotic argument. Apparently, defending yourself is on the same level as attacking someone. Seriously, you people have shit for brains.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:01 AM
12

"the “fathers’ rights” movement, a group of men whose political goals all point back to the single purpose of making it harder for women to rid themselves of controlling and often abusive men." That's where i stopped reading. Less than a third of a paragraph in, and she has already tipped us off that she is either insane or lying.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:48 AM
7

I'm surprised they fined her, even more surprised they banned her indefinitely. Papis now admits his jaw was not dislocated. As i pointed out at the time, dislocation is highly unlikely given the weight and shortness of the attacker... http://www.nascar.com/en_us/news-media/articles/2013/09/02/max-papis-slap-dislocated-jaw-mike-skeen-girlfriend-nascar-truck-series.html He also says... “And by the way … Even if she deserved (it) I will not hit a lady..." This kind of servile, woman-worshiping, cr…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:44 AM
1

"Ken Lay is the Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police." Scary.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:32 AM
3

Well, duh. Alternet, surprisingly, deals with it in a fairly neutral way. The site they got it from, on the other hand, has this charming headline -- "Why He Can’t Keep It in His Pants"
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:18 AM
2

If we can see a smaller woman abusing a larger man, there is no reason based on size to think that he could not have beaten his wife. Men are taught not to flatten women who hit them, women are not taught to not flatten dwarves who hit them.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 02:04 AM
5

Charming. Check out, also, the way they blame absent or rejecting fathers as opposed to parents. Apparently, having an absent or rejecting mother is fine! But then, what can we expect from the people who refused to give food to men in the wake of the Haiti earthquake?
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:57 AM
1

Careful, now. You're starting to rant.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 11:44 AM
0

Yesterday a woman told me to smile -- twice! Where's my Kickstarter, hey? What's really funny is that she will probably get all the money she wants, and then some more. Worked for you-know-who.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:32 AM
3

No problem with female reporters in male locker rooms as long as the male reporters can go into locker rooms full of naked female athletes. The latter is probably a bit risky, though. Men being men, they would probably try to rape every woman in sight.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:22 AM
2

"Such is his desire for equality, Murray had invited Serena Williams to play but she said he would beat her “in five minutes”." Possibly. But only if he's having a really bad day and she is having a really good day. I can't see the match happening, though. Poor Serena is probably still trying to get over losing to that guy that was ranked about 100!
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:54 AM
2

Your girlfriend is a piece of shit. Dump her immediately, before she has a chance to use a combination of female privilege and her own innate evil to screw you over.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:46 AM
-1

Yeeech, fuck feminism. With consent, of course.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 01:30 AM
3

Paul Elam's video on why war is bullshit... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGtI3zOs_2A
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:57 AM
1

"Am I a rapist?" How the fuck would we know? Indeed, how the fuck would you know, given that you blacked out?!?! Maybe she was enjoying it only up to a point, maybe your memory is fucked up by the booze and she was never enjoying it. Hell, maybe she raped you, given how fucked up you were! Fact is, we don't know, and neither do you. PS The one thing that can be taken from this bizarre post is that only morons drink to the point of blacking out.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:43 AM
2

Pardon me for being suspicious of a visitor called named after a famous female trickster... "Eventually Dido and her followers arrived on the coast of North Africa where Dido asked the Berber king Iarbas for a small bit of land...only as much land as could be encompassed by an oxhide. They agreed. Dido cut the oxhide into fine strips so that she had enough to encircle an entire nearby hill..."
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:27 AM
2

The amazing thing is that there is some sort of psychological thing going on where these guys don't even duck or block, much less strike back. It's almost as if they are incapable of hitting people that society has taught them are their betters, rather like being a black man back in the old south. Or to put it another way... http://cdn.meme.li/i/oge98.jpg
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:17 AM
3

Going on the responses to the now deleted comments, i suspect "she" is more likely to be one of the microcephallic boys from the "Manhood" Academy.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:09 AM
0

Hard to believe she dislocated his jaw. She's small, weak-looking and hitting upwards. I don't buy it. The main issue here is that if some guy slapped a girl who had tried to attack his girlfriend, wouldn't nobody be laughin'. The second issue is that the victim will almost certainly not press charges.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:06 AM
-1

Plus, this child was robbed of his eyes. Most likely to be sold in the black market You lying, worthless sack of shit... "Liu said the boy's eyeballs were found at the scene, and that the corneas hadn't been removed." DIAF
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:55 AM
1

I see. So, basically, they're a bunch of retarded 12 year olds.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:57 AM
0

Such eloquence, such cogent arguments. I am fucking humbled! We need better trolls in this place.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:54 AM
10

Also, it seems like she doesn't want the word 'misandry' to exist. Like the idea is dangerous to her. That is exactly what is happening. The word denoting the concept makes the concept more "real" to people, it confirms its existence. That is why feminists detest and mock the word "misandry" but would fight tooth and nail if anyone tried to eliminate the word "misogyny" from the language.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:33 AM
3

I iz stoopid today. I saw that it was by Barbara Ellen, yet i still read the sub-heading...
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:28 AM
4

I have no idea what is going on here. A little expansion would have been nice -- not all of us live on reddit. I, for one, have no idea what the fuck a factual falcon is, nor what he would have to do with black people. He's not the black superhero called The Falcon, is he?
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:27 AM
3

I bet she was a feminist. Don't be fucking stupid. Feminists don't blind 6 year old boys -- they vivisect them!
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:17 AM
-2

No, the real question is why people are questioning why this has been posted. It's almost like you aren't even MRAs...
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:16 AM
4

youpoopmediocrity
/r/MensRights02/09/13 12:18 AM
8

Your comment is gibberish, especially this bit... "Your definition of "inaction" is laughable!" Because, apparently, lack of action cannot be described as inaction. Come on, folks, send us some quality trolls, not these demented 12 year olds.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 12:14 AM
9

bitching about Lesbians bitching about Men. Nice attempt at painting us as homophobes, but we are well aware that most man-hating feminists are straight. Now fuck off.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:19 PM
9

Yeah, the SCUM Manifesto was all a joke. Right up until Solanas walked into Warhol's office and shot him several times! PS I'm surprised Solanas didn't call her rancid little work the SCUM Womanifesto.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:12 PM
1

Feminism is necessary for female-kind to gain equality The wiminz already have equality, scumbag. What feminism works for is female supremacy, not equality. Incidentally, men are better equipped and more logical. It may not be pretty, it may not be PC, but it's the truth.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:08 PM
7

Ah, the old "Not all feminists are like that!" excuse. But where is the vociferous feminist opposition to shit like this? It may be true of action, but you know what else speaks louder than words? Inaction.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:05 PM
2

"we have a feminist infestation of epic proportions." Have you tried cockroach baits?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:01 PM
1

There you have it, folks. More evidence for the idea that women are the caring and compassionate sex. I know what i want for Xmas -- a can of petrol, a box of matches, and five minutes alone with this woman.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 10:43 PM
-3

This isn't really about men's rights. Thank you, o' great and wise one who has made two ( count 'em, two ) comments on our subreddit in the last four months for telling us what is and is not "about men's rights."
/r/MensRights01/09/13 10:40 PM
8

"it's an issue that is pretty equal on both sides, just the means are different." Apparently, trying to kill yourself is "equal" to actually succeeding. Fuck off and fuck you.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:51 PM
1

Trooooollllll
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:31 AM
1

Troooolllll
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:23 AM
-6

According to this, Al seeks permission because he has to. Any more than half a minute lies outside of fair use... http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/cases/#parody_cases And these gals definitely use more than that.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:14 AM
6

Maybe she will, but he won't. Heh, heh...
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:13 AM
0

Tell that to the feminists always going on about women's rights...
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:12 AM
-9

Yes, it does. That's why Weird Al has to get the copyright holder's permission when he does things like "Fat" and "Eat it." Shit, if parody didn't count everyone would be getting ripped off. I could stick some funny lyrics on classics like Sgt Pepper's and make a fortune off other people's melodies!
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:11 AM
0

False? You think the Klan wouldn't like a White House Council on White People? You think they wouldn't like the murder of a white person to be a bigger crime than the murder of a black one?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:08 AM
2

I am not going to drop dead cause some nobody told me to lol. Darn, i was hoping you would...
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:03 AM
-3

No. That would be like being in both the Klan and the NAACP. PS Just in case you don't know when you are being insulted, we are the NAACP, you and your feminist sisters are the Klan -- the only real difference between feminists and the Klan being the latter's superior fashion sense.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:36 AM
3

Justin Abarca is a worthless, half-witted sycophant desperate to get laid. If this photo is anything to go by, he's also an ugly fucker, which would explain his desperation... http://s3-ak.buzzfeed.com/static/user_images/webdr06/2013/7/8/15/justina12-30897-1373310826-0_large.jpg Most of the things he mentions aren't even sex-specific! And women smell like hope and roses? No, fuckwit, their perfume smells good, they don't. And as evidence for "They kick ass and take names with the best of them." …
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:34 AM
-5

"I am a women's and men's rights activist." No. No, you are not.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:20 AM
31

Safe to say, if 80% of suicides were committed by working age women, there would be sex-specific television ads telling the wiminz not to kill themselves.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:12 AM
11

Christ, is there a more thankless task than trying to get the average bloke to see the need for the MRM? Good luck.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 02:01 AM
4

the quality of the sub has declined within the last month as a result. I'll tell you one thing, it's declined since you opened your yap.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:58 AM
4

"Hope you guys agree, maybe the mods can get on this." Fuck you and your attempts at censorship. Don't like it? Downvote it and move on. PS Drop dead.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:56 AM
11

Oh dear. I don't recall Thicke going on about ripping out women's reproductive bits. Typical feminists, obsessed with castration. On that alone, i have reported this for inciting hatred -- I doubt it will do much good, though. Also, this thing is a direct violation of copyright, though i suppose only the copyright holder can complain about that...
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:45 AM
1

You are a naive moron. Stop wasting my time.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:21 AM
1

Newsflash : Julia Gillard is an asshole.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:18 AM
44

"Is this normal for women's studies?" No, it isn't normal -- this woman sounds unusually reasonable for a feminist professor. Most of them would have shut you down by screaming "misogyny" as soon as you disagreed with them.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:27 AM
3

Also, girls can get abortions. Boys can't.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:11 AM
2

Sad news. I hope he sues that scumbag for everything she's got. Even if she spends the rest of her worthless life on welfare, most of it should be going to Banks -- she can always live in a cardboard box and eat out of a dumpster.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:02 AM
1

For long-lasting change, logic and intelligence is needed. Again you astound me.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 11:34 PM
2

Kudos to the woman at around 8 minutes, she says the only sensible thing in the video, namely "Blah, blah, blah."
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:06 AM
6

Eeeww! Anita Sarkeesian and Laurie Penny in the same place at the same time! Here is a question for our Christian members -- is this not one of the Seven Signs of the Apocalypse?
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:04 AM
5

That's why the print is so small -- the more intently you look the louder they can scream!
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:41 AM
3

My cisgendered, heteronormative mind is conflicted as to whether i should upvote or downvote -- the chick's t shirt is bullshit, but her breasts look quite nice. What, oh what, is a patriarchal bastard to do?
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:40 AM
2

"By any means necessary", jackass.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:32 AM
1

Truly pathetic.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:18 AM
1

Logic, not aggression, is how we'll win this war. What world do you live in? An alternate universe in which the average person responds to logic? Get real, most people are persuaded by emotion not by logic. Your naivete astounds me.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:17 AM
0

Well, i'll be fucked. I blame my flu-affected brain. Them nasty germs what is in my brainz is making me stoopid.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 09:44 AM
3

Please, let's see some evidence of someone actually dying because of Manning.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:23 AM
-12

"WHITFIELD: And if this argument is entertained, the issue has to be “why now?” Why wouldn’t this have been addressed long before trial, long before sentencing?" Maybe Manning has finally heard about the female sentencing discount and is hoping to get some sort of appeal going?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 02:01 AM
-1

This isn't a MR issue and let's not try to find excuses to attack women here Thanks for telling us what "our" issues are. Fuck off and leave such decisions to the voting system.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:57 AM
2

I was going to say something jubilant, then i saw Captain Bring Me Down's comment at the top, and i'm afraid he's right. Feminists don't need reddit, not only do they have the MSM they also have massively popular sites like Jezebel.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:51 AM
3

Gee, i was with you till you called him a traitor. Why don't you go back to kissing neo-con ass and leave the important discussions to the adults? There's a good boy.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:42 AM
1

"I hear this a lot in my classes but I don't think that's the case here." Of course there is a patriarchy, just not in the hilarious, feminist sense of the word that adds up to men having all the power -- except when women want to feel good about themselves, then it's a case of "I am woman here me roar". There is also a matriarchy, of course, and both daddy and mommy are getting the crap kicked out of them by the plutocrats. "However, for America I think the gap between rich and poor or even rac…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:16 AM
3

The text is by Watterson, and it doesn't mention kids, the drawing features a kid but is by someone else. Not even the guy who did the drawing is a stay at home dad, unless you count the dogs.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 01:05 AM
2

I don't understand why anyone is laughing. I can only assume they have been paid to do so every time there's a woman on stage.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:52 AM
2

Well, we do know that for a very long time women didn't sweat -- they "glistened."
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:42 AM
10

“I was in a bookshop in the women’s section and a man farted,” The horror. The sheer, unimaginable horror of it all.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 10:46 AM
3

My criterion for "working" is bringing attention to these matters. Elam, for all his many, many, flaws has gotten the movement more attention in five years than Farrell, for all his good intentions, has gotten it in 20 years. As Elam points out, some of the people exposed to the movement will join it, and the movement will slowly grow. As for "positive light," there is no such thing for the MRM -- our very existence is seen as misogyny incarnate. We are scum if we are nice like Farrell, we are s…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 06:17 AM
8

Thanks for bringing up Farrell, he is great evidence for the idea that the nice guy approach doesn't work.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:05 AM
3

I can only imagine that the upcoming piece will be rather like this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSfrbqCQr78
/r/MensRights28/08/13 02:02 AM
0

This, of course, is no guarantee that it will be enforced equally. If Italy is anything like the Anglosphere, it is virtually guaranteed that it will not be enforced equally. The government, and specifically the authors of the decree, can not be accused of writing biased law. No, but they can surely be suspected of writing a law which they know will be applied in a biased way.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:19 AM
5

He makes some good points, but in the real world most men (and women, thanks to the femi-plutocrats ) have to do shit jobs just to keep themselves and their kids out of the gutter. The point might have been better illustrated with a single man...
/r/MensRights28/08/13 01:15 AM
1

Why? Don't piss in your own puddle, i guess. This way their family and friends are less likely to find out what they are up to. Except for the ones stupid enough to put their pictures in the paper, of course.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 12:59 AM
1

Yeah, yeah. I'm sure Gaiman is a fine chap in many ways. I am almost inclined to forgive him simply on the strength of A Dream of a Thousand Cats. It's one of the best comic stories i have ever read -- and i'm not even a Sandman fan.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 02:27 PM
1

W.A.M can ironically (or should that be "appropriately"?) be taken to stand for Woman Against Men.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 11:54 AM
5

Meh, even if the claims of violence are true it is difficult to feel sorry for assholes whose website sports this banner... http://femen.org/front/images/header/femen-sait-02.jpg
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:58 AM
14

"They are looking for attention and excitement but end up, often without realising it, being one half of a prostitution deal." Stopped reading there.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:42 AM
1

Woosh...
/r/MensRights27/08/13 10:28 AM
6

A few years from now he'll probably be having a Twitter meltdown and admitting to being a bipolar fraud.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:46 AM
4

These folks are so detached from reality that Neil Gaiman would mine their dreams for writing material. Alas, i fear Gaiman would probably be too busy agreeing with their feminist BS to have the time to gather new material.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:45 AM
3

"If I had known the story of my false rape allegation would be held up by so many dudebros as the reason why you can’t take rape allegations seriously..." Couldn't be bothered reading past that. In fact, i don't know why i read even that far after seeing it was from "free"thoughtblogs. I can only surmise that my recent bout of the flu has lowered my IQ.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:42 AM
3

Just like how there have been many outspoken anti-gay protesters who turned out to be in the closet the whole time. Ted Haggard being a prime example... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Haggard#Scandal_and_removal_from_job
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:24 AM
-1

May your female relatives develop some sort of painful and lethal cancer. Oh, wait, they already have...
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:19 AM
-1

His primary point is that the article is tripe (mmmmmm...tripe). Having read the article i know that it is not tripe hence see no reason to address his post point by point.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:12 AM
28

"The perfectly coiffed Kupchick, 48, earlier stood out among the sea of prostitutes and drug addicts in the main arraignment court." How horribly degrading for the prostitutes and drug addicts!
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:30 AM
1

"In Stephen King, there are two big no-nos. One is being mean to women; one is being mean to kids." I wonder how he feels about people being run over by idiots?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:27 AM
20

There are two terms currently in use to describe non-consensual sex. When the person not consenting is female, the term is "rape." When the person not consenting is male, the term is "getting lucky"!
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:46 AM
3

They could have chosen a better photo...
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:53 AM
3

Jesus fucking christ, this article is tripe. This article is complete and utter fucking tripe. It isn't even sensible. It isn't balanced. It's bullshit apologist tripe. Grab your meds, dude, i think you are suffering a psychotic break.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:06 AM
-1

Shut up, you troll.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:01 AM
1

Trooooolllll
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:44 AM
4

it's just a he said she said story without more proof.. What the fuck are you on about, pinhead? She was much younger and in training, he was old and retired. On that alone it was rigged, but then you already know that.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:40 AM
2

If the man or woman explicitly stated they don't want to do something, and the partner continued having acknowledged this, it is rape. So now you are agreeing that the case in the newspaper was indeed rape...
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:28 AM
1

"He would still be guilty if he did something she asked him not to" Gee, fancy seeing that as rape! What is this world coming to? Tut...tut...
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:24 AM
5

Debunking a lie likely to be believed by a significant number of people is an important thing to do, and you know it, asshole.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:15 AM
4

A 30 year old woman beats a 55 year old man at tennis != women are =+ in everything else except in the minds of people who don't have critical thinking skills. That's at least two thirds of the population, asshole.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:41 PM
2

"If searching for rapists, one looks only at the male population..." Tell that to women who have been in jail.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:19 PM
0

"We" this, "our" that. Look, it's another concerned poster with a rabbit up his arse.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:13 PM
1

today, patriarchy hurts men more than it hurts women Ding, ding, ding! Troll alert ! Troll alert!
/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:09 PM
55

"Technology from a feminist perspective is social, cultural, technical objects or arrangements." Is it just me, or does that not make grammatical sense? As for looking at tech as social and cultural, who the fuck doesn't?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 11:04 PM
1

Overloads?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 09:14 AM
-3

I don't know how he can even be in the same room as Friedman. Seriously, i would have belted her quick as 50 Cent would belt David Duke. And i really hope Paul had the sense to do a recording of his own, otherwise he will have no viable defense against the upcoming hatchet job.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:57 AM
1

Hey, no worries, always glad to help out.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:54 AM
1

What discussion?
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:34 AM
-5

Pathetic cartoon series. Never read a single panel that made me laugh. As for these examples, is humor even attempted? It's like they were written by the president of NOW, it's feminist propaganda of the most unsubtle kind. PS Fuck you, Garry Trudeau.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:20 AM
1

Troooollll.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:13 AM
1

Nice try, fuckface, but the connotations are very different. Comparing someone to a work of art is exalting, comparing them to a tool is degrading. Also, the word is spelled "compliment," schmuck.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:00 AM
1

Don't understand what?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:53 PM
2

I'm sorry, i meant to use a period in my last comment, not a question mark. I was complementing you on not being a what.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 01:31 PM
0

You're not what?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:52 PM
1

Shush, i'm busy awaiting a response from a troll.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:56 AM
3

Er, is that an Asian woman being roasted on a spit?!?! Say, you're not trying to make us look bad by association, are you?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:44 AM
1

Reminded me more of this one... http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/24872140.jpg
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:39 AM
2

What Guitars said, with the added observation that, much like "You angry, nigger?" it comes across as a phrase that trolls use to subtly hint that they are trolls so they can snicker when people don't pick up on it. In my view, you are nothing but a mild-mannered concern troll and i feel sorry for your bridge -- it must be feeling quite lonely while you are at the internet cafe.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:37 AM
2

Yeah, yeah AVFM isn't perfect but not even the morons from SPLC compare them to Stormfront.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:31 AM
3

This woman obviously has shit for brains -- comparing a woman to a great work of art like the ceiling of the Sistine is more gynocentric than anything else.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 05:11 AM
-7

Personally, I think what's missing is a voice for feminism within the AVFM Short response - Fuck You. Long response - What the fuck are you on about, you wanker? You think the NAACP should give Stormfront a voice at its conventions?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 04:53 AM
2

Really? Say more...... Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:56 AM
1

Because, you know, you've done it before wrong?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:49 AM
1

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evidence
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:48 AM
1

"Twitter isn't always the best place for big, thorny philosophical conversations. But it's a great forum for catharsis and taking the temperature of a popular sentiment." Yes, because Twitter is sooooo representative of the community at large.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:33 AM
1

Still waiting for that evidence, coward.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:27 AM
0

You though... You though I was being serious... Say what?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:26 AM
10

"Why Do So Many Incompetent Men Become Leaders?" Because the incompetent women are busy running the feminist movement?
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:03 AM
1

"Ok,I might have confused you with someone else, and I'm not bothered to scroll to may 2012 in your history. I'm pretty sure I was you I had that conversation with though ..." Still waiting for that evidence.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:32 PM
0

Good to know. See, you can be reasonable when you want to be.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:31 PM
3

Better judged by twelve than carried by six.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:29 PM
2

You are confusing pre-pubescent girls with women. Sexual dimorphism is great amongst adults, insignificant amongst children.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:28 PM
6

Sir, i do believe you have missed the snark hinted at in "can show his/her true colors."
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:31 AM
0

I think we need your definition of patriarchy then. "Anything what i think is bad is patriarchy."
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:18 AM
11

Yes Funny, i would have thought she was the product of monarchy.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:16 AM
5

I believe that in the UK women are a disadvantaged group. Which disadvantages are you talking about? Living longer? Getting more degrees? Being less than 10% of workplace deaths? Making up less than 20% of the homeless? Help me out here.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:16 AM
4

Yeah, thanks for your concern...
/r/MensRights23/08/13 11:13 AM
2

Trooooollllll!
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:59 AM
0

"OH, GOD, OH NOES! WHY WOULD YOU DO SUCH A DREADFUL THING!?!?! SOB, SOB..." Schmuck.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:47 AM
3

"the ultimate [act] that would be the taboo, to show how bad some villain is." Male writer describes rape as worse than murder, torture and infanticide, feminists yell misogyny. These people are bat(man)shit crazy. Oops, sorry, i should have said bat(woman)shit crazy. Damn my latent misogyny!
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:42 AM
3

TIL that Gail Simone is a feminist asshole. These people have to get their hands on everything in order to carry out their evil agenda. As for the audience for comics, who do you think reads Simone's work? That's right, it's mostly males. The companies try, but western women do not want to buy comics. Fucked if i know why. Grim stuff like Batwoman, mostly male audience. Cute stuff like Palmmiotti and Conner's Power Girl, mostly male audience. Shit, i'm willing to bet that even Strangers in Parad…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:31 AM
5

I can't see any biological reason why prepubescent girls would be less active than boys, so though i hate to say it, it probably is society's fault and hence an imbalance that needs to be fixed. As long as it isn't fixed Title IX style, by getting to 50-50 by forcing boys to be less active.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:16 AM
3

No one goes outside anymore. Rubbish, i'm typing this comment outside. Having the back door half open counts as being outside, right?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:12 AM
-1

Slam your fist through her face. I mean it, gone are the days when girls would slap you and walk away in a huff -- these days the slap may be a mere precursor to smashing a beer bottle into your face. Treat a woman as you would a dwarf with a knife -- small, weak, dangerous.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:58 AM
-2

Oh, please.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:52 AM
0

Troooollll.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:47 AM
1

the Australian law is discrimination, and should be changed as is the men's version. Evidence please.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:40 AM
-1

Wow, it's like you didn't even read my comment. Amazing.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:40 AM
0

Don't act surprised at someone saying that. It is really ignorant Don't worry, i am never surprised when someone says something ignorant. PS Show me some non-shitty feminists -- claiming unicorns exist is not the same as proving they exist.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:37 AM
-1

And as I've said, I've SEEN pictures of penis in various mediums, including university newspapers. On the cover? I think not. You would not have the cops knocking at your door, that's just silly. First, i have a better idea of how my country reacts to these things.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:35 AM
-2

"we have important things to discuss here" There's the infamous pronoun again. Got a rabbit up your arse, do you?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:31 AM
-1

Evidence please. As an Australian i can tell you that i have never, ever, not once, seen male genitalia on the cover of a magazine. Except in a porn shop, and needless to say those mag covers feature more cunts than cocks, by far.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:27 AM
0

Troooolllll. Really, can we get some higher quality trolling in this place? Such obvious tactics as claiming i did something i didn't and refusing to give evidence are an insult to one's intelligence. Maybe we should arrange to give our trolls IQ tests? "what are we, Manboobz?" In your case the answer is probably "Yes, or at least something very close to it."
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:24 AM
0

"In Australia the censorship laws are such that depictions of female genitalia cannot have labia and must show only "discreet genital detail" whatever that means." Really? And what are the laws on male genitalia? Can we have those all over magazine covers?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:36 PM
0

The girl in the article is part of the Women's Collective, what the fuck do you think she blames for her insecurities -- feminism?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:29 PM
-3

Making shit up and going with the probabilities are not the same thing. This is a world where men end up on sex offender lists for taking a piss in an alley while drunk. Chances are 18 boys would have been treated much more harshly for pulling such a stunt, if you don't know that you are a fool.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:26 PM
-1

Put 18 pics of dicks on the cover of a mag meant to be distributed to college students and then see if you are treated as leniently as the girls in this case. You'll have the cops knocking on your door and the media calling you a pervert.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:23 PM
3

I've met a lot of "non-shitty" Feminists, Really? Where are they?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:17 PM
-1

This has nothing to do with Mens Rights. Yes, you are right. It has nothing to do with men's rights that women are so well off in our society that they have to go hunting for the most trivial things to complain about.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:16 PM
-1

"You don't recall being interested in the GMP article that was republished in an Australian news paper about the larger guy that posed nude in order to deal with male body issues ? We should pick our battles, this is a non issue for us." First you claim i supported it, now you claim i was merely "interested." Nobody around here is stupid enough to buy the idea that those two words are synonymous. And i am still waiting for evidence of my "support" for Naked Fat Guy, i don't even recall such phot…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:07 PM
-1

For the morons who think this has nothing to do with blaming patriarchy, here are a couple of quotes from the Mag's Facebook page... "Why is that penises are scrawled in graffiti all around the world, but we can’t bear to look at vaginas?" I've seen quite a few graffiti cunts as well, but then i'm not as phallocentric as the average feminist. "We acknowledge that the notion of vaginas pertaining exclusively to women is a very cisgendered conception of anatomy and identity. While vaginas often be…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:00 PM
0

What the hell do you think a girl who "... is a member of the Women's Collective at the University of Sydney" and her friends mean when they blame "society" and porn? Feminism? The plutocrats? Elves? She means patriarchy, duh.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:53 PM
0

I remember you supported a similar idea when it was done on the good men project. If by "you" you mean me, i would like to see evidence, i don't recall supporting such a thing. As for the inclusion of the word patriarchy being misleading, what the hell do you think a girl who "... is a member of the Women's Collective at the University of Sydney" means when she blames "society" and porn? Feminism? The plutocrats? Elves? She means patriarchy, duh.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:46 PM
2

Good thing she didn't kill him -- then she would have gotten only 30 days.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 11:47 AM
28

I considered calling this post "Cunts on Parade," but thought better of it. And why have i placed the word "vaginas" in quotes? Because you don't see any actual vaginas, just vulva etc -- the word vagina denotes a particular part of the female sexual anatomy, not the entire thing. It is both fitting and amusing that a bunch of girls making feminist statements about female sexuality should be so ignorant of their own bodies. Oh yeah, here is the mag cover. NSFW, obviously. Fine photographic work,…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 11:01 AM
2

Did that actually happen? I doubt it, it's hard to believe any woman would be stupid enough to marry the internet's most hideous man-slug.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 10:24 AM
0

You should have spun around and pissed on her. On the other hand, anyone that entranced by a man taking a piss would probably enjoy it so forget i said anything.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:32 AM
5

"a world where being a boy gave you social and sexual advantages over girls." And what world would this be?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:30 AM
2

Futrelle is shit. I refuse to give him a page view.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:26 AM
4

They are probably going on about that study which compared a set of real female averages of 101-103 to a hypothetical male average of 100. Problem is, most studies show the actual male average to be around 105. Study shows women are dumber, study is used to prove that men are dumber - welcome to Feminism 101.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:03 AM
0

Probably just another leftist type thing that got co-opted by feminism. I would be surprised if there was anything in the roots of the movement that justifies putting women so high on the list of priorities. Not much that can be done bout it, dumbasses will be dumb.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 04:55 AM
1

There is no such country. The developed world screws over men, the third world screws over women.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:10 AM
-14

I don't know, i would probably react the same way. I guess the lesson here is that you should pay attention to where you're going -- and if you can't do that, you can at least learn to duck!
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:07 AM
2

Gee, it's really disappointing when someone you support turns out to be a dumbass...
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:00 AM
1

With any luck this dirtbag will die in childbirth and the kid can be raised by the dad. Good news for dad, good news for the kid -- single dad kids turn out better than single mom kids, so i am told.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:20 AM
4

Men and women are equally affected by judges ignoring evidence. Given all the studies showing men get screwed at every stage of the legal process, this is difficult to believe.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:18 AM
0

The entire point of the procedure is to limit women's ability to have sex. So, this must be the idea of other women, right? After all, if you limit women's ability to have sex you are also limiting how much sex men get. Most people are straight, after all.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:15 AM
1

those crying fowl What kind of cry would that be? "Bok, bok, bok," or "quack, quack"?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 01:06 AM
3

Welcome to the feminist version of equality.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:15 AM
-4

I knew he was an unfunny asshole, i didn't know he was also a misandrist asshole.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:10 AM
5

Shit, i guess that means we aren't as successful as i had thought.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:08 AM
1

Dr E The cartoonist?
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:02 AM
-4

Ha, serves the gynocentric pinhead right!
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:54 AM
3

Remember, the right wing is the friend of men.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:52 AM
2

Thank god, for a moment i thought the headline read "Why are there so few dongles on TV?"
/r/MensRights21/08/13 05:50 AM
2

Concern from a brand new account who likes to use the pronoun "we", how novel.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:22 PM
2

4? 5? Am i being too optimistic here?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:19 PM
3

what is expected of women, nowadays? Complaining. Lots and lots of complaining.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:07 PM
3

"Obviously, I’m not a relationship expert." I was tempted to not read beyond that but, foolishly, i did... "Never stop courting. Never stop dating. NEVER EVER take that woman for granted. When you asked her to marry you, you promised to be that man that would OWN HER HEART and to fiercely protect it. This is the most important and sacred treasure you will ever be entrusted with." Excuse me while i vomit.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:05 PM
2

It was meant to be a catchy summer pop hit. Nailed that perfectly. Yes, i have to agree. After listening to it again a couple of times, the hook got me. Average song with an above average hook would have been a better way for me to put it.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:42 PM
6

I just now watched the Thicke thing and have some rather obvious observations to make. One, the weakest, crappiest falsetto i have ever heard. Two, song is average at best. Three, that brunette is fucking gorgeous. Four, desperate publicity ploy by a third rate act.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:24 AM
6

Fucked if i remember why, but i have you tagged as "suspect," and i don't do that without a good reason.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:07 AM
3

You just mentioned the three most likely culprits, though the first two are more likely.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:51 AM
4

Meh, fuck the law. Manning is in jail, Cheney's free, that's how much the law has to do with what's right and wrong. Remember, it used to be against the law for a slave to run away from his master.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:50 AM
-5

By this logic you would "never take to" Reddit. Comments are not my idea of content. Articles, cartoons and, in the case of A.A, videos, those things are content. Comments are just my two cents' worth. PS How's the trollin' goin'?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:47 AM
1

Homophillia?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:43 AM
10

See, this is why i never took to YouTube, you have no real control over your content. Set up your own site, and only you and the law can take shit down.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:16 AM
2

Males want evidence, women want feels. It's an exaggeration, but it aint no fabrication. This is part of why the plutocrats will do nothing to fix the education gap, they don't want the more rational sex to be in positions of influence. This applies only to the lower classes, of course, the education gap vanishes once you start looking into the stats for the upper classes. At the top, logically inclined males, in the middle and at the bottom, emotionally inclined females -- doesn't take a genius…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:06 AM
-2

"5% say it actively made it worse" Proof that 95% of people are idiots.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:53 AM
3

Either way, she isn't an idiot - she's just playing a very risky and volatile game. Funny, i would have thought that playing a risky and volatile game would itself be evidence of idiocy, at least when the potential gains are so small.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:41 AM
22

I think the world would be a better place if Moby were barred from opening his fucking gob.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:34 AM
4

Ah, but let's see her get away with it a third time. Heh, heh...
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:15 AM
5

While i support her, and boys in the same situation, the only reason we heard about this case at all is a fortunate confluence of gynocentrism and whatever the opposite of homophobia is. If she were a straight male she would already be in jail.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:13 AM
7

Oh dear, someone's got shit for brains, hasn't she? She shouldn't be getting prosecuted for having sex with another teen, but reality is what it is and she should have enough sense to keep away from the other girl till this is all over and forgotten.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:10 AM
2

"there's a limited natural ceiling and this is something that the body building industry will not say for obvious reasons." I remember the year they brought in testing for the Mr Olympia. By some odd coincidence, every single contestant turned up with a significantly larger head -- either that or a significantly smaller body!
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:33 AM
3

Sad sign of the times. Back in the Nineties the only place you saw bigorexia mentioned was in bodybuilding magazines like Flex, now it is apparently a widespread enough problem to make it into the mainstream.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:30 AM
2

Asian women wear Burqas. You are an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:21 AM
2

What's a joke? Your comment? The shirt? Help me out here.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 10:20 AM
2

Have you ever been to an Asian country? While Asia has a lot of misogynist shit going on, it also has its misandrist side. How many Asian countries send women to die in wars? How many socialize women to believe that it is their gender's responsibility to go down the mines or to build skyscrapers an bridges?
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:49 AM
6

Norway? Norway has quotas for women in politics, and probably more shit that i haven't the time to check.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:44 AM
0

You seriously getting upset over this post? Fact is, the best that can be argued here is that the shirt can be taken to mean that men should shut up and obey, or it can be taken to mean that women are domineering assholes.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:16 AM
1

What's your fault, that you can't punctuate?
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:14 AM
4

So i see. How bizarre.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 05:11 AM
4

It's still there... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_Reddit_communities#Alleged_Misogyny
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:52 AM
1

"Defamation doesn't work unless it's your real name/person that he is defaming." Wrong. It is defamation if the person being defamed can be identified. Unlike most users on reddit i am not exactly anonymous, anyone googling The Pigman is quickly going to find out whose username this belongs to. Shit, it's at the bottom of every cartoon. "it's nothing like the precedent that you linked at all." Sure it is, the precedent is that you can get sued under Australian law (which is much less tolerant of…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:04 AM
0

Funny, i don't recall saying that i was going to sue you, only that i could. And as you have now escalated to accusing me of wanting to fuck a 14 year old you have really stepped over the line. Would you like to withdraw these accusations while you still can?
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:58 AM
0

Oh, dear...
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:47 AM
1

Oh, i get it, u b trolling.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:46 AM
3

Asssshoooolllleeee!
/r/MensRights18/08/13 11:39 AM
3

Whoops, Slate.com, not Salon.com. Stupid similarly named websites...
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:39 AM
1

"My job has led to me shitting in a bag exactly zero times. You? " To which Hank would probably reply "Hey, at least i didn't get cancer from messing with all those chemicals when i was young!" "It seems that WW was really just a latent sociopath waiting for the right conditions to arise." Yep. He could have used that fine intellect to grow the world's best weed, but he had to go for something as destructive as Meth. Something wrong right there. Shit, at least Jesse can always plead to being a d…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:37 AM
1

Google Gutnick vs Dow Jones. Also, keep in mind that most sites would give up this fucker's IP rather than get dragged into a legal mess, and that even layers of proxies can be traced to the real IP. Not that i'm about to sue, but who knows, some day in the future i may -- or may not. Oh, yeah. It just occurred to me, i could actually report him to the Australian police for having used a carriage service to offend me -- three years jail, max. Apparently, it is you who are new to the internet.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:30 AM
2

I swear, when i saw this mentioned at AVFM i thought they were kidding, that it was meant to be a satire, but nope, the thing is real.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 03:11 AM
1

"Is it wrong to benefit Professionally from a Sexual relationship?" Not if you're a prostitute, no.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:58 AM
2

Whether these chicks are genuine fans of One Direction or mere trolls, this is a fine example of how it isn't just women being "abused" on Twitter. I can only assume that the guy in charge of Twitter will now apologize to The Who as he did to women who got slagged on the site. Heh, heh...
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:52 AM
2

I pretty much agree with all that, though i should point out that Hank is also a bit of a macho jerk whose goading over Walt's unmanly ways may well have had a part in pushing him over the edge. Someone really needs to sit down and do a long article on this series from an MRA perspective, it explores a lot of MRA type issues.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:43 AM
4

you're supposed to like Walt and dislike those who get in his way. If so, the writers have failed miserably. First season, Walt was so-so, the great flaw -- and an indicator that he would eventually become evil -- was that he was making meth instead of growing pot, other than that he was a sympathetic character. Soon after, he started doing really contemptible things. He's fascinating, but hasn't been likable for several seasons now.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:37 AM
1

"There are things I've forgotten over the length of the series," Like poisoning a little boy in order to get Jesse to help him take down Fring!
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:30 AM
0

I think you need to go off and read the work of the socialist philosophers. Unless you're simply a lying sack of crap, in which case you can get stuffed.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:09 AM
-2

Pedophilia pertains to adults having sex with pre-pubescent children, moron, not adolescents having it off with other adolescents. Now fuck off and die in a fire, and keep in mind that i could easily sue you for the above comment.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:06 AM
1

No one signed a petition for my brother or cared Hey, moron, did you bother to set up a petition? Let's see it.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:02 AM
0

"24 and 8 okay?" You are an idiot.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:01 AM
0

" At your age if you don't see a 14 year old girl as a child... Let alone a child too young to have sex... This is just getting creepy." Nice attempt at trying to portray me as a pedo, dirtbag. In some ways a 14 year old is a kid, but then so is an 18 year old. Kid fucks kid, kid goes to jail? Not in an just world. Now eat shit and fuck off.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:59 AM
6

Don't worry, the SPLC and Manboobs still hate us...
/r/MensRights17/08/13 11:20 AM
12

As opposed to the men, who are a bunch of sweethearts.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 11:18 AM
1

Unlikely as the address "Pencil Box Way" is, i have nonetheless reported this as doxxing. For all we know, the state and name may be correct and someone may be trying to get this kid in deep shit. Also, if he isn't a convict it is probably defamatory to call him one.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 11:16 AM
0

Gee, you didn't answer my questions about Uncle Karl, why is that? As for the imperial regime, if you don't know that such a thing exists you are blind, willfully so, i suspect. Also, socialism has never actually been implemented -- just because the Soviets called it "x" doesn't make it "x" -- so i don't see how you can blame it for anything. Fact is, the plutocrats could totally and utterly crush feminism as they did socialism, communism, and anarchism, yet they don't. Funny, aint it?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 06:24 AM
1

Trooooollllll
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:58 AM
1

25 and 15, now that's abuse, not 17 and 14.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:56 AM
1

Nothing wrong with a backlash, the word has simply been assigned negative connotations when the actions it describes are being carried out by men on the behalf of men. Hell, feminism in the Arab world is a backlash against patriarchal excess, yet, strangely enough, i don't see the western feminists using the term to tar and feather their Arab equivalents.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:50 AM
1

Marxism? Really? Marx thought most degrees should go to women? Marx wanted bigger penalties for femicide than for homicide? I'm no expert on old Karl, but i would be amazed if he supported these things. PS Why is your right wing bullshit showing up in r/mensrights?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:45 AM
7

Do you really want to get Dolph Lundgren pissed off?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:41 AM
4

Once more my dwindling faith in humanity is still too much faith in humanity. Don't blame all humanity for the actions of a few, it's irrational and bigoted to do so.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:24 AM
11

There's at least one video on YouTube of a couple getting stoned to death for adultery.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 02:22 AM
2

Did you read the 'toon?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:58 AM
-3

Little kid? Cut the hysterics, dude, it makes you look stoopid.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:56 AM
2

Just because boys get screwed by these insane laws is no reason to want the same to happen to this girl. Amazing, it's almost as if you didn't read my comment...
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:54 AM
0

Just because boys get screwed by these insane laws is no reason to want the same to happen to this girl. Amazing, it's almost as if you didn't read my comment...
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:52 AM
1

I subscribe to the one that says adults having sex with children is rape, and most of our laws would imply that most of our society does too. There is no child involved, only two teens. As for what society thinks, there was a time when society thought slavery was okay. Hell, society currently thinks it's okay to treat men like shit, i guess that makes it okay, huh?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:49 AM
1

Depends on how you define rape. The law sees it that way, but the law is wrong. There is no rapist here, and there is no victim.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:47 AM
1

Great argument, moron.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:44 AM
-2

I have read otherwise regarding the ages. Not that it matters, it is still a small difference -- from the perspective of a man in his forties these are both kids and as long as they are both teens it shouldn't be the business of the law to throw either of them into jail.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:45 PM
-7

Don't waste my time. Nothing you say refutes my position.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:39 PM
7

Yes.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:11 AM
9

This is what feminists would like us to think of as a "cute girl" -- someone who looks like a young version of Andrea Dworkin!
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:07 AM
6

They are using Hunt's current age, but the other girl's age at the start of the relationship. When the thing started, Hunt was 17, the other girl was 14, so it was actually a three year difference.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:00 AM
-8

Good -- i am one of the many thinking adults who signed the petition. Also, the headline makes it look like like there is a five year difference, it is actually a three year difference -- they are using Hunt's current age, but the other girl's age at the start of the relationship. When the thing started, Hunt was 17, the other girl was 14, that is hardly child molestation. Just because boys get screwed by these insane laws is no reason to want the same to happen to this girl. With any luck this …
/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:58 AM
-1

I don't know, maybe he's stupid. By the way, did Elvis really rape you? I heard that years ago and it seemed unlikely that someone so tanked up on drugs would be physically capable of such a thing.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 04:55 AM
3

What is this shit, an attempt to give feminists yet another excuse to ask that girls be treated better than boys? The article actually admits that girls are still doing better in most subjects!
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:08 AM
0

Highlights murder by females, hence is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:00 AM
-2

If i was in Texas i would be waiting for her with a razor-studded baseball bat.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:58 AM
1

"When she was released and returned home, she refused to allow one of the men to leave again."
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:07 AM
0

"Man up, you pansy hostages." Coming from a site called Guyism this is an especially disgusting and repulsive comment. Unless the writer is willing to say the same thing to two women who refused to have sex with a male captor, of course. Chris Spags is a maggot-ridden dog turd.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 12:05 AM
0

Good god! Do you really think i bothered reading past the first paragraph? You are either an inadequate troll or a nutter. Either way, fuck off.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:51 PM
1

Yes, i am well aware that the etymology of the world is bullshit, but much like the word "decimate" we are stuck with its common usage. Wishing you good mentla health, The Pigman
/r/MensRights15/08/13 11:00 AM
7

I didn't read it at all once i saw it was from the "proudly female-biased" Dailylife.com.au...
/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:40 AM
4

"What should feminists do about rape?" They should commit it less often. Heh, heh...
/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:39 AM
3

No, courage has no sex or gender. It does seem to occur more often in males, but then so does lung cancer...
/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:38 AM
0

For fuck's sake, women are never going to rule anything. All cloning will do is make it possible for the rich men to breed without women who can divorce them then walk away with the kids and a pile of money. Even before cloning becomes viable, the rich will start using surrogates rather than wives. As for the coming underclass, their women won't be able to afford cloning so they will have to keep the men around.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:53 AM
1

Oh, please...
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:23 AM
7

"Daddy, I am practically a woman, I don't cook. Why don't you just do what I do when I get hungry - get a date?" Kelly Bundy from Married With Children
/r/MensRights14/08/13 11:03 AM
3

Batshit crazy, it's the kind of idea one expects to see in a cartoon... http://thepigmancometh.com/2011/11/12/good-advice-from-an-unexpected-source/
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:50 AM
1

Get stuffed, ya bloody wallaby-humping pile of cockatoo shit.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:36 AM
1

I'm not the one slagging Elam, am i?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:30 AM
40

"Magistrate Elizabeth Hall said she was persuaded by medical evidence the woman was suffering a psychiatric condition and a "flight from reality"." Flight from reality, a common condition amongst women, especially those who work as magistrates. As for the sentence, the only problem i have with it is that were the sexes reversed the perp would be sitting in jail right now.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:00 AM
1

We know...we know...
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:56 AM
15

Nope, no defining moment, i just hate to see people treated unfairly by various power groups and i see no reason why i should shut up when the victims are straight, white males. Fuck, if i can complain about Oscar Grant's murder why can't i also complain that few blacks in his situation are female? If i can slag off some turd for being a homophobe why can't i slag off Sharon Osborne for being a misandrist? Call me crazy, but injustice and bigotry give me the shits, regardless of who the target i…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:54 AM
7

like those other feminist satirists Valerie Solanas... Yes, it's always satire until you walk into Andy Warhol's office and put several bullets in his torso...
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:36 AM
9

"But there’s no harm in a little idle fantasy, is there?" Okay then, i hope things turn out for the writer the way they turned out for the woman on the left of that still from Les Diaboliques.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:31 AM
4

It all appears to be surprisingly candid and confirms most MRAs view of the true nature of the male feminists of the world, but Schwyzer is so suspect that i can't help but think that he's up to something. I can't see him going MRA on us, but he might just develop a career as an "expert" in mental health problems amongst men.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 01:16 AM
1

By people waking up i meant the voters. Labor is simply being pragmatic.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:34 AM
1

Still waiting on the evidence that you are more than a mouth on the internet.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:29 AM
1

A welcome sign of the times? The whole "Misogyny! Misogyny!" thing failed miserably for Julia Gillard, perhaps people are finally waking up to feminism's dishonest tactics.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:46 PM
2

Crap comic, crap joke, just plain crap.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:39 AM
3

This comic is amazingly dumb. So Conway killed Gwen Stacy, big deal, characters get killed off left, right and centre in comics and most of them are white males. It's meaningless.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:44 AM
3

I assume you mean Sampson, on whom Superman was partly modeled, or do you mean Superman himself, hence the "essentially" Jewish? For those who don't know, Sampson could leap tall buildings (synagogues, presumably) in a single bound, just like Supes, who did not actually fly in his original form. As i recall Sampson was also a rather mild-mannered man when not in hero mode, just like Clark Kent. Quite fascinating how much of their Jewishness Siegel and Schuster put into the character -- even the …
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:44 AM
2

"HaHa!" Or to be more Australian about it, "Sucked in, ya bloody wallaby-humping boofhead." Man, i hope Shermer totally ruins this bastard.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:10 AM
1

Haven't been to the doctor in at least a year, but then i have had no reason to see one. Soon as shit turns up, i'm in there as quickly as any woman -- it's my little "Fuck you!" to a misandrist society that would rather see me suffer.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:10 AM
10

And while we are at it, why didn't Germaine Greer and Andrea Dworkin legally pursue the men they claimed had raped them? If they are so fucking concerned about women why allow two rapists to roam around raping more women?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 02:03 AM
0

"...commanders need to downplay obstacle courses and judge a service member’s ability to stay calm and think quickly." In my experience, men stay calmer than women when the shit hits the fan and they think at least as quickly. As for bringing Audie Murphy into this, since when is a small man the physical equivalent of a small woman? There's a small man at my gym (5'5" or so, 100 pounds at the most, small frame, small muscles ) who uses the entire stack on machines on which most men of average or…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:59 AM
1

Deleted by myself, got the wrong end of the stick.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:45 AM
1

What BrambleEdge said.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:36 AM
2

I don't are what? Laughed out loud at that one.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:35 AM
1

Links at the bottom of this article... http://thepigmancometh.com/2012/02/16/female-teachers-giving-boys-lower-marks/
/r/MensRights13/08/13 01:19 AM
1

Yeah, that's what i expected you to say.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:21 PM
1

"I think the intentions were good but lacked long term thinking." Rubbish, the leaders of the movement are not idiots. They chose the name precisely to be divisive. "I owned a t-shirt that says 'this is what a feminist looks like'. I wore it to tatters." You sicken me.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 10:42 AM
34

The LSE did a study that showed that teachers (most of whom are female) give their sex better grades for the same standard of work. Throw in a culture that constantly tells boys they are stupid and it's amazing that boys aren't actually doing worse than they already are.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 10:29 AM
8

You think that's bad! I got banned from the UK subreddit for disagreeing on some feminist point or another. Who'd a thunk it? Seriously, these people infiltrate every bloody thing they can find, precisely so they can quash dissent whenever it pops up.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:41 AM
2

You don't know who I am and what I do in real life. Just out of curiosity, who are you and what do you do in real life? It's easy to imply that you are "contributing" in some significant way, but i need evidence. Hell, for all his faults, at least Paul is sticking his neck out, that's more than can be said for you.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:25 AM
3

"Snark is the idiot's version of wit." Ironically, this is itself a snarky comment.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:28 AM
0

You are dumb.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:18 AM
3

Nothing yells out "Troooollll" quite like a response consisting only of "wtf?Lol."
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:16 AM
1

While i agree with his sentiments, this is not exactly Paul at his most articulate, is it? Surely he could have expanded a bit -- as it is, this is not so much an article as it is a short and hasty comment.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:14 AM
1

CrazyBoy Academy is more like it.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:10 AM
0

“The first thing I do when I walk into a room is figure out which man could kick my ass...” If his photo is anything to go by, that would be all of them. “Men aren’t being men anymore; they aren’t taking care of women.” Eat shit, number 12. This is a rather pathetic bunch of men. Keep in mind, the really masculine ones wouldn't be answering such ads. Also, the photos have probably been chosen by the writer, who is a woman.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:51 AM
-7

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 01:01 PM
0

Meh, we are probably supposed to assign gender to the word balloons.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 12:45 PM
2

I believe they call this feeling freude. FTFY
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:06 AM
-1

I'll tell you what i think when i know who he is. Weird post, asking us to voice an opinion on an unknown quantity.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:10 AM
1

Asshole Cosmo strikes again. Can't find a man, girls? Probably because you've been taking too much advice from rags such as this.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:04 AM
5

I'm a mod on the female pickup artist sub Just don't go offering a man coffee on an elevator at 4am, we freak out when that happens. /s
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:57 AM
15

Not to mention drone executions without due process. Hell, the American constitution is little more than a relic of a better, freer time.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:50 AM
1

Meh, this guy is such a lying bastard that until a whole team of shrinks comes forward to certify him as batshit crazy i am not taking this seriously. It could be a hack, it could be a desperate publicity stunt aimed at getting him a second career as an "expert" on mental illness.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:41 AM
0

No, you can not be a member of both the Klan and the NAACP.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:24 AM
1

Keep working on it, kid, and some day you may make it to the rank of third rate troll.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:22 PM
1

"Like violence, the media shows mixed portrayals of rape. It is sometimes demonized, sometimes glorified." Quick, three examples of rape being glorified. "Who feels insulted when they hear "thou shalt not kill"? Almost everyone is capable of this crime." Nice job of ignoring my use of the word direct. If you have no problem with someone telling you to your face not to kill people then you are a fool -- i on the other hand, already know that murder is usually wrong. Also, how about a campaign tel…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:21 PM
1

"Lol you called him an idiot who believes in the angry old man in the sky. That's hate." Don't waste my time with such rubbish.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:57 AM
4

I stopped reading when i got to "including the radical male empowerment community, r/mensrights,"
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:19 AM
1

Hey, don't blame me, i'm not the gullible one, the pastor is. Also, hate is a rather strong word for what i said. Contempt, maybe.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:14 AM
2

They work as secretaries. Except for the ones he keeps as sex slaves, they're locked away in the basement.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:13 AM
1

I see... it's all rather confusing...
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:55 AM
-1

Fact one - society already teaches boys to not rape by constantly portraying rape as a bad thing. Fact two - directly telling boys not to rape is insulting as it implies they are little scumbags who are capable of such a thing.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:15 AM
26

I have it on good authority that Willy Wonka pays the female Oompa Loompas less than he pays the male ones.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:28 AM
3

Bloody hell, not only does he seem to have missed the snark in my comment, but he seems to have swallowed every drop of Koolaid in the jar... "The Pigman August 9, 2013 at 8:02 pm Wow, a Christian and a feminist, just what the world needs more of. The Fat Pastor August 9, 2013 at 8:06 pm You were the 1000th comment on The Fat Pastor blog! I wish I could give you a prize. Thanks for reading, and for commenting. And yes, I feel that to follow Jesus Christ, it is impossible to not be a feminist as …
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:22 AM
3

Fact one - society already teaches boys to not rape by constantly portraying rape as a bad thing. Fact two - directly telling boys not to rape is insulting as it implies they are little scumbags who are capable of such a thing. Fact three - it is no surprise that someone stupid enough to believe in The Angry Old Man Who Lives In The Sky should also be stupid enough to swallow feminist venom.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:14 AM
1

If you've removed it, why can i still see and comment on it?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:11 AM
0

Shamelessly plucked from this earlier post, apparently just before it got modded out of existence... http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1k284a/dont_rape_should_be_taught_alongside_eat_your/
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:09 AM
3

Meh, i've been banned over there so i can't tell them how wrong they are in everything they do and everything they say. This shit-brained woman should find something better to do with her time, maybe go around telling little girls not to turn into women who abuse their children. Oh wait, that would be misogyny...
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:59 AM
1

JTO vs Manhood Academy. Listen for even just one minute, and you'll wonder if you've fallen into a time warp and wound up back in high school.. Gee, i am not much of a fan of JTO but i'm surprised he took the conversation any further than "Eat my shit and die in a house fire." Don't feed the trolls Johnny. PS When you gonna put Otep Shamaya on Register-her? Bad jokes justify inclusion, Menocide doesn't?
/r/MensRights10/08/13 12:40 AM
1

Read his blog. The man has the intellectual honesty of Sean Hannity. Of course, i'm sure Hannity has cred with his moron followers, and so too Myers with his own little cult.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:52 PM
67

Oh, don't worry, if anyone accuses their beloved PZ of rape they will quickly switch back to a more demanding standard of evidence. Hell, they'll probably do that if anyone accuses Myers of stealing their sandwich! PS I can hear the feminists now -- "I can't believe some MRA douchebag just compared rape to stealing a sandwich!"
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:58 PM
54

Wow, Myers is really asking for a massive lawsuit. His intellectual cred has long been dead, soon his wallet will follow.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:41 AM
1

Or is it only complaining if a man benefits? The answer is that it is only complaining if a man complains as a man. Other forms of complaining benefit women and are therefore allowable.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 01:11 AM
2

I think she's hanging around tech conventions, wearing a cunning disguise and waiting to pounce whenever a man says the word "dongle."
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:41 AM
1

You know, it just occurred to me that in most jurisdictions rape is defined by the law as something a man does, maybe that's where they get these BS definitions?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 12:30 AM
31

Yes, yes it is.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 11:54 AM
1

Oh, yeah, you are a troll. Disgusting when you guys troll on important issues like sex and race, but what else can we expect?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 05:43 AM
1

How dare you, you speciesist bastard! What the fuck is wrong with being a pig, hey? Fuck you, man, i should call PETA on your ass!
/r/MensRights08/08/13 05:37 AM
1

Downvoted for being posted by a fuckwit.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:07 AM
2

This is why i distance myself from the left more and more every day. My views may be mostly leftist, but no fucking way do i want to be associated with such a bunch of feminist assholes.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:55 AM
1

Now how do you think I feel when I constantly hear my chances of ending up in prison are higher than someone else's? I see. I, and the Jesse Jacksons of the world, should stop mentioning the truth because it makes you feel bad. Amazing. If you had any brains you would thank us for telling you to be careful out there. You are male, you are black -- to borrow some hyperbole from IceT, you were born dead. I have been unusually patient with you because you claim to be young, but the truth is that yo…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:50 AM
4

Fucking Todd Goldman strikes again. Seriously, this guy should be taken to court over these things.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:30 AM
-1

Trooool.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:17 AM
1

"I constantly get compared to the proportion of black people who commit crimes when in reality the only thing we have in common is our skin color. That's like a feminist being afraid of you because you are a male and males rape ppl...." There you go again, totally ignoring what i actually wrote. Looking more and more like a troll.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:14 AM
1

Portuguese and German are possibilities.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:12 AM
121

It's his fault, he was oppressing her by being white and male in a public place.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:33 AM
2

Rubbish. The story says the man and the dog swam to shore, not that the man carried the dog to the shore. This post is nothing but an opportunity for the SRS types to come in here pretending to be MRAs and saying all sorts of crap that can then be attributed to our subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 10:56 AM
3

You basically just grouped me by the color of my skin and because of the "statistic" I, AS A INDIVIDUAL, has a higher chance of getting put in jail than you, ALSO A INDIVIDUAL. Look past the skin for once Don't kid yourself. First, as a black male you are more likely to get accused of something you didn't do, then once charged you are more likely to be convicted and more likely to be given a heavy sentence. This is the fact not only when compared to whites but to black women. This makes it a gen…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 10:35 AM
4

"I don't look at myself as a statistic." You should, to a great extent we are all statistics and the numbers on just about everything look worse when you are male or black, much less both. Quick, you seriously think George Zimmerman would have shot dead a Tawna Martin? That cop who murdered Oscar Grant, have you seen that shit happen to black women with any sort of regularity? As others have said, read the sidebar stuff.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:06 AM
0

I don't have time to read this entire thing so i will comment on your first line... "As a 18 Yr old black male..." Who has a one in five chance of ending up in jail, you or an 18 year old black female?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:48 AM
1

It's probably a linguistic quirk. I'm sure there are plenty of languages in which the male is not the default.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:45 AM
1

This sub is really starting to turn into a male SRS Oh, yeah, you are a troll, no two ways about it.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:29 AM
1

And yet you still went ahead and posted this shit.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 02:25 AM
2

In lieu of a comment, here's something i wrote a few years ago... http://thepigmancometh.com/2009/06/04/giant-herbivores-terrorize-japanese/
/r/MensRights06/08/13 12:01 PM
10

Thanks for the concern, now get stuffed. Really, posts like this are insulting and ignorant. First, women are viewed as morally superior so every time people are presented with an event that says otherwise the facade is weakened. Second, women get away with lesser punishments far more often than men. This is something shown in the same research showing that whites get lesser punishment than blacks. PS Did i mention you should get stuffed?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:46 AM
0

If you are going to pretend not to get my analogy, you should dumb down your writing. That way we might believe you are stupid rather than dishonest.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 11:24 AM
3

Wait and see. When the accused man is rich, these things are far more likely to be bullshit than when he's Joe Average.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:57 AM
1

Don't give me that crap. Whether it is written into law or not does not change the way she was treated by the legal system. It isn't written into western law that male criminals should get heavier sentences, so i guess it's okay that they do, right? As for male rape, i never even mentioned that.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 01:48 AM
6

Your friend is an asshole and you need to get a new one (a new friend, not a new asshole).
/r/MensRights05/08/13 11:19 AM
5

I didn't make it that far, but if she went about it the right way he could probably sue her. It is England, after all, the country where Steven Berkoff successfully sued someone for writing that he was hideously ugly, which is clearly a lesser insult than accusing someone of hating half the human race.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 11:14 AM
6

I couldn't watch more than the first few minutes of this woman's inane blithering. Lette is a total joke whose only good point is that she did Australia a favor by fucking off to England.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 11:08 AM
4

A feminist complaining about "freedom of screech" is wonderfully ironic, especially from someone who sees all men as being on probation. “Misogyny against women,” as opposed to that more common thing, misogyny against men. This is a writer? “You are speaking from a position of privilege – you’re white, you’re middle class, you’re wealthy.” As opposed to the poor, black woman with whom he is arguing. “I have a right to speak on behalf of all women.” No you don’t, except perhaps for the ones who a…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:05 AM
4

Alas, there are such countries. How could you have missed this story? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23381448 She was later released due to pressure from the West, but it is interesting that when she asked staff to call the cops they asked her if she were sure she wanted to do such a thing, almost as if they knew what was coming.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 05:29 AM
1

"Paul Elam is an Illuminati agent? Really?" No, of course not -- Elam isn't one of the Illuminati, he's one of the Lizard People. PS Hey, how about that, my spellchecker recognizes the word Illuminati but not the word misandry...
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:16 AM
2

I don't see why OP has to demean poor old Alex Jones by comparing him to Marcotte...
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:34 AM
5

Am i the only one who gets a whiff of very subtle trolling from our visitor? These are really just the kind of questions we get from feminists trying to make the women look oppressed, but couched in far gentler language than usual.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:56 AM
2

The World Bank backing up feminist claims and the Left still can't see that the feminists and the plutocrats are working together.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:53 AM
3

Both the FBI and crime writer Linda Fairstein, who is the former head of sex crimes in NY DA's office, put it at 10 %.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:59 AM
3

It's not his, it's the source's. Perhaps the pun is part of the reason he posted it. Seems unlikely a male reporter who had beaten up his wife would be described as hard-hitting in the headline!
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:05 AM
5

Could be worse, at least she wasn't hard-stabbing. Surprises me that the cops saw her as the primary aggressor, though. That definition is usually rigged to make the male look like the perp.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:03 AM
5

Says Peter Nobody in the comments... "Not pretty bad...a disgrace that men would even allow a woman to carry ANY message for them." Obviously a man with lots of sawdust between his ears. Another good reason to not waste time watching his video.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:57 AM
5

Who is this guy and why should i waste my time listening to him?
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:53 AM
1

Wait and see.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:51 AM
6

Well, at least this time he didn't try to take anyone with him, so i guess his character has improved.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:41 AM
0

First, once i tag someone as a troll i no longer read their comments. Second, there's something really wrong with someone who picks up an argument that's been over for days. Even by troll standards you must be a rather pathetic person.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:15 AM
2

Since when are Manhood 101 guys this tolerant and civilized?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:32 AM
-2

First, what the fuck do you expect from the kind of chimpanzee that roams Walmart? Second, soon as he got in their face she should have kicked him in the balls or punched him in the throat. As it is, she should at least call the cops and have him charged with assault. Seriously, who needs feminists when you have male neanderthals like this guy running around?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:31 AM
2

Self-hating homosexual, best ignored.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:20 AM
3

Once again, the startlingly original and inventive mind of Seth MacFarlane gives us something totally new -- disparaging portrayals of white men on tv. As for the BS about Obama's America, this shit was acceptable way before that particular butcher got into office.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:10 AM
5

What a myth, the idea that being happy is the best revenge. I can just imagine this abusive woman sitting there feeling awful that her kid grew up to be happy...
/r/MensRights03/08/13 10:59 AM
2

That would be them, yes. What goes around comes around, just ask Julia Gillard!
/r/MensRights03/08/13 10:58 AM
-2

Should have called a cop, preferably the kind who likes to shoot anything that moves.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:57 AM
5

Hang in there, kid. Wait till she's old, then stick her in one of those nursing homes you see on Sixty Minutes.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:50 AM
-3

Typical male -- gets pissed on, reacts by getting on the piss. Seriously, why complain about a situation if you are too much of a wimp to hit back?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:48 AM
2

Why stick to just one victim? Are you suggesting women lack ambition? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nannie_Doss
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:44 AM
3

I hope she gets the Zimmerman treatment. Oh, wait, wrong sex.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:37 AM
1

Dude, you get the prize for the most obvious troll of the week. Seriously, you need a lot of practice.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:35 AM
3

Black man calls a white cop a cracker, white cop shoots black man dead, black people complain, assholes like you step in and tell them race has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:32 AM
1

Thanks for the advice. Now fuck off.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:29 AM
2

The feelz dude, it's all about the feelz. When, oh when, will the patriarchy understand this?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:02 AM
1

Feminism has the same PR problem as white supremacism, they're a pack of assholes.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:54 AM
4

"edit: Yay they left" They never have the decency to leave, most likely they were kicked out.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:08 AM
2

If Sweden is the Saudi Arabia of feminism, Australia is the Sweden of the southern hemisphere.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:06 AM
1

Last i heard he was working behind the scenes with Fathers and Families, but is now listed as an emeritus... http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/about-us/
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:01 AM
2

Oh, please. You are either very stupid or a third rate troll.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 11:07 AM
3

What's with the crow? Is she accusing him of being the dad?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:52 AM
3

Not me. I bumped into Glenn Sacks' site a few years ago. Whatever happened to him?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:51 AM
1

A suppermarket, it's where Brits buy their suppers from!
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:50 AM
26

Say "Goodbye."
/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:38 AM
2

Yeah, i'm sure it's all just a fortuitous coincidence...
/r/MensRights01/08/13 06:13 AM
2

Don't give me that crap. Most writers may not make it, but the ones who do make a fortune. How much do you think she gets for writing for the Nation? At least a couple of hundred thousand a year. As for books, the standard deal is 10% of the retail price of each book. Even a few hundred thousand copies sold is a nice piece of change. Then, of course, there are the feminists who have sold millions of books over the years. Do the math and you have a bunch of multi millionaires.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 03:03 AM
1

Weird that that's the thumbnail, because that pic is nowhere to be seen on the actual page.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:52 AM
2

Why the fuck would you vote another plutocratic stooge into the White House? And don't you realize that being female will shield her from left wing criticism that would be leveled at a white male Prez? Every time she does something vile she and her supporters will pull the Gillard and scream "Misogyny! Misogyny!" at the critics! The same wimps who are afraid to call out Obama lest they be labelled racist will be afraid to call out HC lest they be ostracized for not toeing the feminist line. Vote…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:44 AM
4

Sexist, classist, war-mongering scum. That's HC in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:34 AM
3

I think its something they like to pride themselves on.. how tough they must be to go through child birth, I wonder what percentage of women start screaming "Drugs, drugs! For God's sake, where are the drugs?" as soon as they get to the hospital? "Btw, where did that ridiculous assertion that only women can multitask come from? It's just a flat out lie." As i recall, there was a study showing that women were slightly better at multi-tasking and men were slightly better at focusing on the same ta…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:32 AM
0

You think Jessica Valenti and her ilk write their books for free, do you?
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:14 AM
4

Hell, i didn't even know the Windsors were Jewish! "The late Princess Diana is believed to have discontinued the tradition — to the rumoured anger of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip." Good on her.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 02:09 AM
6

My comment on his site, unusually mild as it is... "Good riddance. PS Don't come back."
/r/MensRights31/07/13 11:34 AM
3

Good for you, but what i meant is that there are places in the US where the doctor will quite literally tell you to bring your wife in so she can give her permission!
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:01 AM
0

"...this is the last you'll hear from me." Promises, promises.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 05:57 AM
1

Consider yourself lucky they haven't asked your wife's permission, assuming you have a wife.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:52 AM
6

"Males are affected by the patriarchy as well." Couldn't take it seriously after being thrown that old chestnut.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:50 AM
-2

"You really are a conspiracy theorist." Conspiracies take more than one person, hence my implying you are both the same person can not be taken as a claim of conspiracy.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:32 AM
4

Legally it's bullshit. Socially it's true.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:25 AM
0

Nice try, no cigar.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:24 AM
11

The feminists were right -- rape culture does exist!
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:14 AM
3

If Julia Gillard's miserable failure at playing the gender card is anything to go by, it is certainly happening in Australia.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:13 AM
0

Awww, what's the matter, ookums, did i hurt your widdle feelings?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 01:02 AM
1

I am always astounded by people who remember living through things I read about in school. And i'm always astounded by how little they have learnt from their experience.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:58 AM
1

"I didn't comment on the picture because it was posted here and was obviously sexist." And yet you commented on my supposedly obviously sexist comment! Why does one "obvious" bit of sexism deserve to be commented on but not another? Because the first was about mere men, the second about sacred women?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:57 AM
-1

Wow, really upset you, didn't i? Your punctuation and spelling have gone to hell, it's like your brain is having a meltdown. There's nothing as satisfying as pissing off a troll.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:54 AM
-1

Troooooollll.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:51 AM
-4

Nice try, moron. PS You used the wrong account to reply, schmuck.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 12:49 AM
-10

STEM? How stupid to assume that just because i don't rank the Beatles with Darwin i must be some sort of tech geek. Hell, i know more about music and art than i know about science.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:33 PM
-13

You are an idiot. First, i am an artist. Second, you do not give any evidence that science is not more important than art.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:28 PM
0

Yes, perhaps tea parties would be safer. On the other hand, she would probably freak out at the sight of a dead teabag!
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:36 AM
-12

If we took the policy that art was useless and only science was of value, we'd be China, not Britain. Nice try, but at no point did i even imply that art was useless. It is definitely not as important as science, no one can argue with that. Shakespeare, probably the only writer so great that he deserves a banknote.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:32 AM
-9

Well, apparently the problem is that Brits aren't too fussy about who goes on their notes. I assumed it had to be a truly great person who had been of some real consequence to British society, but apparently you take notes as seriously as Yanks take stamps -- they've had stamps with Elvis on them, sooner or later you will have notes with The Beatles on them!
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:29 AM
-9

Dickens is, i am told, a writer of greater standing than Austen, but even he aint no Darwin. Perhaps Brits aren't fussy as to who they put on their notes -- Sooty or Basil Brush next up, hey?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 11:25 AM
-18

Way to miss the point. Darwin changed the world, Austen merely amused it.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 07:00 AM
-12

Actually, it may not be a conspiracy ( a conspiracy is hidden, this was out in the open) but it is certainly feminist. Austen did not change the way humanity looks at itself and turn the bible on its head, Darwin did. At the very least they could have found a woman of real worth, perhaps Florence Nightingale, but not someone whose claim to fame is a few clever books and nothing else. What next? Douglas Adams on a note?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:59 AM
-3

Another outsider, but at least a civil one. Point? The point was to flip it around -- say something sexist about women then wait for comments from hypocrites like FourthLife and t4llagent, who made no complaint about the anti male sexism but who took my bait as soon as it hit the water. Never fails. You will notice that none of this subreddit's regulars are questioning me, they are probably busy laughing at how easy it is to game the feminists. PS Screencapped, just so the aforementioned butthea…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:41 AM
-4

Oh look, another outsider offering his wisdom. How unsurprising.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:32 AM
-4

I owe no explanations to fools who spend their time at other reddits then pop in here to tell the actual MRAs what to do and say. Grow up and fuck off, outlander.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 06:31 AM
-8

"Blah blah blah blah." You are a fool who has totally missed the point. Get stuffed.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:19 AM
-14

Don't waste my time.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:13 AM
82

I doubt it will teach him anything. He'll probably just dismiss her as an oppressed, male-identified slave of a male supremacist system.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 01:56 AM
15

She seems totally ignorant of how trolling works. It would probably come as a massive surprise to her to find out that the same people who are "threatening" to rape her today will tomorrow be at a men's rights site calling us faggots and the next day at a hip hop site calling its readers niggers. Someone this ignorant shouldn't be allowed to write anything more important than a post-it note.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 01:26 AM
0

States the obviously hard-as-nails writer... "One can only be exposed to this sheer hatred so many times before it begins to seep into your core. You read it and hear it and see it without flinching, and then suddenly without warning find yourself standing in the shower one evening feeling broken yet unable to cry..." If you break so easily, it might be time to retire from the internet. Seriously, take up gardening or something more genteel -- sounds like the internet is giving you PTSD!
/r/MensRights30/07/13 01:05 AM
2

Troll or idiot, either way a waste of time.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:51 AM
5

Don't tell us what does or does not fit into our subreddit, gaijin.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:46 AM
4

Hey look, guys, an unexpected visit from David "Manboobz" Futrelle.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:29 AM
7

Don't like it, don't read it. Facebook shots give us a nice glimpse into everyday misandry, the kind of misandry that proves that feminist propaganda has an effect outside of Wiminz Studies class.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:27 AM
2

Sure it is, everyone knows that the baby grows by eating the food its mummy swallows.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:24 AM
1

Meh, most you can say is that most people get less stoopid with age, which isn't saying much when you consider how dumb most people start out.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:21 AM
5

Another fine product of feminist indoctrination. Also a fine example of the American education system -- if babies were carried in the stomach they would be digested before being born, whereas the modern female prefers to eat her offspring after they are born.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 12:19 AM
-11

Rubbish, they apologize more often because they do the wrong thing more often.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 11:59 PM
3

The Quicksand Effect -- is that a great name for a death metal band or what!
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:02 PM
2

You want to marry a 14 year old? Sick, unless you're 14 yourself, in which case it is just plain stupid.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:52 AM
2

Not willing to break statutory rape laws, but may go to a country that allows you to marry at the age of 14-16. See, now I can't tell if you're serious.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:30 AM
1

There he goes again...
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:29 AM
1

Roseanne? She never says anything sensible, why should i waste my time watching this?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:26 AM
-2

"A woman with at least enough intelligence to carry a serious debate." Unrealistic expectations guarantee disappointment. "A woman who has had no sexual partners before myself." Unless you are willing to break some statutory rape laws, it aint gonna happen. Having a "type" isn't sexist and your friend is a moron. Ditch her before her feminism becomes even more rabid.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:07 AM
2

Can't comment, busy driving through the internet at a furious speed.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:01 AM
1

Part of this article, which i didn't read as i was too busy laughing... http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/mens-issues/husbands-go-on-strike-tibet-1928/
/r/MensRights28/07/13 03:07 AM
4

What's with this nerdy guy in the photo? Is he really a female supremacist, or is he just getting screwed by the internet? "it would take me down an unsuspecting, beautiful, and transformative path" The path was "unsuspecting," was it? Semi-literate schmuck.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:32 AM
1

If i ever meet Todd Goldman he's going to have a lot more to worry about than a few rocks.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 02:20 AM
28

"Kirk Sneade ...and his campaign team have been branded "misogynist pricks" Oh, the irony. Not that the people using a male bodypart as an insult would be able to see said irony...
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:54 AM
2

China is not in the Western world.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:47 AM
-1

eat a bag of dicks Homophobic much?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:46 AM
3

So much for "To serve and protect."
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:45 AM
1

But actually, even when broken down, for those jobs in which data is available, women earn less than men, on average, in 107 of 111 occupations. What he conveniently leaves out is that when all those things are taken into account the gap shrinks to about 3 cents.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:20 AM
1

The bad news is that this man is a mindless schmuck. The good news is that he will pollute the world for about six years less than the female feminists.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:16 AM
1

OP, i see this is in Canada - if i send you the money for postage, would you mail me this poster? I am running out of toilet paper.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:04 AM
2

We thank you for your concern, now fuck off.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:58 AM
3

In China, the barbarians aren't at the gate, they are inside the gate. But hey, what can you expect from a country that will see a toddler run over and then just let it lie in the street?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:56 AM
2

A nice surprise, for once.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:53 AM
2

Beware anyone with the word "bait" in their username.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:48 AM
1

Turns out it goes way back to 1908. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia#cite_note-Oss-29
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:47 AM
1

"Yes she did get some heat for being a female politician" What the feminists don't want you to know is that for every asshole who hated her for being female, there was at least one other asshole, of a different kind, who supported her for being a woman. The true misogynists were, at the very least, balanced out by the woman-worshippers.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:40 AM
3

She certainly got into the parliament just for being a woman -- the seat of Lalor was (still is, far as i know) a safe Labor seat for which only a woman is allowed to run. The tories can put up men, of course, but like i said, it's a safe seat...
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:48 PM
3

From what i've seen it's the other way round.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:16 AM
18

"I think some of the stuff about me, because it is about gender, gets glossed over more easily. If I was the first indigenous prime minister, and (Tony) Abbott had gone out and stood next to a sign that said, 'Ditch the black bastard', I reckon that would be the end of a political career," Given how hard things are for aboriginals in Aus, i find the comparison offensive. After all, blacks have it worse than whites, but women have it better than men.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 11:11 AM
3

Any evidence that the original comment was mere satire?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 10:46 AM
2

Cool. She defamed him and that's all there is. He'll probably win too as the UK's defamation laws are really strict -- as i recall, Steven Berkoff successfully sued a writer simply for saying he was hideously ugly.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:41 AM
1

I can't believe how many idiots think this doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:31 AM
15

Yeah, damn straight. What kind of idiot thinks the encouragement of sexual violence against men is a men's rights issue!?!?!
/r/MensRights26/07/13 02:18 AM
1

If i knew this woman, i would get her really, really drunk and then very nicely ask her to cross a highway.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 01:59 AM
3

"White Lady’s philosophy is to, with a woman's understanding, help families reflect on and celebrate the life of their loved one..." Yeah, because male funeral directors are insensitive bastards who will refer to the dearly departed as "the carcass" and then throw them into the nearest dumpster.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:19 AM
3

"According to a study of IQ tests from around the world, women have higher IQs than men. Researcher James Flynn checked out the IQs of people from the U.S., Europe, Canada, New Zealand, Argentine (sic), and Estonia, and found that women came out on top. Score." TIL that there is a new country called Argentine! As for the study, as i recall, it compared women's IQs to a hypothetical male average of 100 not the actual male average of around 105.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:01 AM
8

Related is the fact that the LSE did a study showing teachers in High School give their own sex better marks. Once the landscape was re-arranged so that most teacher in HS were female that sexism started working against boys.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:47 AM
12

"We're still annoyed at the recent study that found men throw better than women (we know puh-lenty of women who can out-throw men)." Yes, because knowing a few women who are six feet tall contradicts the idea that men as a group are taller than women as a group. Blithering, sexist claptrap not worthy of any more of my time.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:44 AM
2

Seems reasonable.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:42 AM
1

There's something very wrong with someone who continues an argument almost two weeks after everyone has left.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:40 AM
3

r/rapingwomen Sick shit, but virtually deserted and hence does not justify the statement that reddit is dark.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:59 AM
9

From your description, Jezebel seems about as apt a name as it gets for that particular pool of internet slime.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:26 AM
-4

White privilege is being able to walk through a neighborhood carrying some Skittles without getting a bullet in the chest.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:22 AM
1

Evidence? Seems very unlikely that un-educated blacks in the American South were borrowing terms from Shakespeare.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:19 AM
3

How about "scum"?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:12 AM
3

Considered not reading after seeing it was by Hugo watsisface, stopped reading when i got to "melanin deficient."
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:10 AM
1

I don't recall saying all their stuff was bad...
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:49 AM
22

"88 per cent of scenes show physically violent acts such as slapping, gagging or choking" A clear lie unless the so-called research made sure to use a very unrepresentative sample. Stopped reading after that.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:19 AM
7

Eat my shit, supremacist scum.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:59 AM
-1

As a female, if I am passed on the street by a man of any color, I hold onto my purse tighter. Why not hold on to your purse when you see a woman coming? You think it takes a lot of strength to mug a woman, do you?
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:46 AM
1

Well, of course you should be more afraid of men -- men are twice as strong as women so if a male person gets violent you are in more trouble than if a female person gets violent. Unless you are scared of male midgets this is not an issue.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:42 AM
2

The Young Turks are feminist idiots, like most left wing media figures.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:40 AM
4

where are all of the news stories, personal anecdotes, etc. about this happening to women? Oh, i'm sure it happens all the time, but the Worldwide Patriarchal Conspiracy keeps it out of the media.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:23 AM
1

Fuck that. If you think the guard would have followed a woman around under these same circumstances you are an idiot.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:21 AM
0

See, now i'm glad they copped all that shit over the comment about Bush. Fuck 'em all, and the feminist horse they rode in on.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:49 AM
5

Hey, she's not bad looking for a politician, maybe someone should put together a series called Milfs of the UK Parliament.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:45 AM
2

He was lynched before he turned evil.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:40 PM
28

Said it before and i'll say it again -- one day we will all wake up, turn on our computers, and find out this entire subreddit has been deleted.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:32 PM
0

Common, everyday occurrence in the gynocentric West. Not exactly news.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:47 AM
1

Yay, another parasite for the house of Windsor! Frankly, male or female, a new royal is just another massive dole bludger. The entire royal family needs to be sterilized, we don't need more inbred leeches sucking on Britannia's teat.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 10:39 AM
6

Excellent link.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:47 AM
9

Unlike women, Hitchens has a genuine problem -- he's bloody dead! As for female atheists, that's what the world needs -- more Rebecca Watsons.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:20 AM
1

Rubbish. There are clues that good writers use to indicate that they are not to be taken seriously. As i recall, Adams did not use these. And yes, if you make a statement in earnest and then claim it was sarcasm, irony, a joke, in order to get out of trouble, you are a coward.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:00 AM
1

How the fuck am i supposed to remember, you fool? This argument was over 11 days ago. Move on, already.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:57 AM
1

Being in an unusually good mood, here's a tip for you troll boy -- once i tag someone a troll i no longer read their comments.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 01:55 AM
1

It's a rebuttal to the idea that boys and men are all scum.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 11:06 AM
-1

Thanks for the article. "Next time do your own research and don't be an idiot." Asking for evidence to support an assertion is not an act of idiocy, it is an act of intelligence. PS Get stuffed.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:56 AM
-5

The only reason he succeeded in saving the kid is because George Zimmerman wasn't around. Hey, someone had to say it.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:52 AM
-1

Once again, i say "Evidence, please." You claim there is a newspaper article and interviews, so let me see them. Claiming that evidence exists and presenting the evidence are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:32 AM
0

Sarcasm not made clear from the start is often nothing but a coward's way of getting out of trouble.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:30 AM
1

Ignore the troll.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:29 AM
0

Oh yeah, definitely a troll. Who the fuck else uses terms like "owned" apart from trolls and fifteen year olds? Pathetic.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:26 AM
1

"After the case the lad’s mum said he had now lost all his friends..." So much for the idea that "scoring" is all that teenage boys care about.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:59 AM
1

After this video was known to the public there was a general condemnation... Evidence please.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:41 AM
1

Another good reason to do away with the police. As for the Feminazi-Cum-Stormtrooper, who is she and where can we complain about her behavior?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:40 AM
5

"Laurie Essig, Ph.D., is a professor of sociology and women and gender studies at Middlebury College." That's as far as i read. As for gay men being happier, of course they are -- that's why they're called gay.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:35 AM
-1

I will not let people de-credit this movement by Bad case of hyper-agency much?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:17 AM
4

It's not like we're going to be winning any respect by being NICE to the opposition here. But...but...being nice has always worked so well for Warren Farrell! /s
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:16 AM
0

Thank you, o' great and wise one, for telling the rest of us what words we can and can't use.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:15 AM
5

Thin edge of the wedge.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:08 AM
0

Troooolllll
/r/MensRights22/07/13 12:36 AM
17

Now all we have to do is sit back and watch Adams pussy out like he did after mocking both MRAs and women in one of his blog posts. As i recall, he claimed that it was all about mocking the MRAs, the bits about the wiminz were "irony."
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:06 AM
0

Not that i needed confirmation that you are an idiot, but here it is... "I have a penis and two testicals,"
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:00 AM
0

Are you kidding me? This thread is 2 months old!
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:58 AM
2

Nice try, but there is more to it than the health issue. The writer makes that clear by calling it a feminist issue and then goes on to whine about beauty standards. The whine may be justified, but it is indeed a great example of how hard feminists must look for problems to complain about.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:12 AM
1

Undeserved violence is terrible.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:58 AM
2

Don't waste my time, troll scum.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:02 AM
2

Rubbish. Choice isn't that clear cut -- men are taught that it is manly to put themselves in danger. Also, in the gynocentric West it could well be argued that if the dangerous jobs were female-dominated they would be made safer. PS Please get stuffed.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:00 AM
5

Must be nice to have so few real problems that you can actually waste time carping about a situation easily resolved with a Gillette.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:52 AM
2

"Americans against the tea party" sounds like a left wing group, in which case misandry is not only to be expected but de rigeur.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:41 AM
1

The adjective "black" is redundant.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:39 AM
3

And yet, it's 1 in 5 black men who end up in jail, not 1 in 5 black women. And, in the black community, which sex gets almost twice as many degrees as the other? It aint yours, jackass.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:38 AM
1

Sexist asshole complains about sexism, fails to see the irony.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:29 AM
-2

That's no way to talk about yer mom, yer wanker.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:25 AM
1

Nice try, but once i mark someone as a troll i stop reading their comments.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:19 AM
4

What? Where?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:52 AM
1

Wow, that response had nothing at all to do with what i wrote.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:46 AM
4

It's not that you can't belong, it's that you don't seem to belong. Now kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:45 AM
6

Nooo, nothing was forced on them, because males just loooove being told they're not men.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:38 AM
3

There's that "we" again.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:35 AM
1

"My blog is A Catalogue of Lies." Says you. I don't see your name on it, and whoever does own it might be dead as they haven't posted since nov 2012.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 10:34 AM
7

"We are so retarded on this." Hey, look, a third attempt to be seen as one of "us" despite having anti-MRA views.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:32 AM
2

"I can't believe how all this stuff about rape is so confusing to us." There's that claim to being one of "us" again. Funny, coming from someone whose comments seem to mostly oppose MRA views.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:30 AM
2

"Our" movement? What do you mean by "our," paleface?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:26 AM
5

And check out Neil Gaiman as a supporter. Stick to writing comic books, Neil -- when it comes to serious social issues your brain is stuck in the kingdom of dreams.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:22 AM
5

Since when do feminists give a shit about their sons?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:06 AM
1

Is it April 1st already?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:04 AM
2

Ironically, i'm upset that there's still Harriet Harman.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 02:59 AM
6

No worries, it's just that us pigs are sometimes over-sensitive, what with the bacon issue and all...
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:15 AM
3

How dare you, madam!
/r/MensRights19/07/13 02:09 AM
1

When the authorities have told you to stay in your car, it doesn't take hindsight. Hell, it doesn't even take foresight, the person on the other end of the line has done your thinking for you.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:41 AM
1

No, i am not implying that he did so, only stating that he might have, hence my otherwise inexplicable use of the word "could." If i had just shot a man dead the first thing i would do is beat the crap out of myself, preferably by forming the dead man's hand into a fist then punching myself in the mouth. Zimmerman looks to dumb for that advanced tactic tough.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 01:38 AM
2

It's definitely a shitty and tragic situation for everyone involved, most of all Martin. Can't argue with that.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:42 AM
3

Fine, one comedian not two, but it is still enough to frighten people into silence, which is probably what it is meant to do. If Molloy can't make a joke about adultery, how the fuck does a political blogger get away with stating outright that a certain politician is a liar or an idiot? Surely those things are far more defamatory, and even if they can be proven you still have the cost and hassle of the lawsuit. And do you seriously think the Judges involved are dumb enough to look at that clip a…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:41 AM
0

I don't recall arguing he should have been convicted, only that we have only his word as to what happened. As for reasonable doubt, you are probably correct, but it is only reasonable doubt, not a guarantee that he didn't do it. One thing is certain, if Zimmerman had stayed in the car and waited for the cops Martin wouldn't be dead and Zimmerman wouldn't be spending the rest of his life looking over his shoulder.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:27 AM
3

Didn't the Panthers pretty much say they wanted his guts for garters?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:21 AM
-1

No, science does not back up anything other than the idea that Martin was "standing over Zimmerman." It does not, according to your own source, show that Martin attacked Zimmerman -- no significant injury to Martin's hands, and Zimmerman could easily have caused the injuries himself. If his mouth was busted up and Martin's hands had cut knuckles, that would support Zimmerman, as it is all we have is his word that Martin attacked him.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 11:20 AM
2

How do you know how it went? Were there any witnesses other than Zimmerman and the dead boy? What were you expecting Zimmerman to do, admit to murder? And incidentally, if i saw a fucker in a car following me, i'd hide and ambush him too. Of course, we don't know if that is what Martin did, because he's fucking dead!
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:31 AM
4

Feels too much like re-writing history. "I am the almighty Pigman, i make no mistakes." That kind of thing. Big Brother would have loved the internet, so much easier than re-writing newspaper headlines.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:15 AM
5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9hU8ov-Lp4 http://kellywarnerlaw.com/not-funny-molloy-loses-appeal-in-defamation-suit/ I would tell you what i think of this woman but i don't want to get sued. As for the offense law, google it.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:10 AM
15

Aus may not be a totalitarian state, but freedom of speech is eroding fast. Comedians have been successfully sued for making jokes, and offending someone on the internet is a violation of a law that could land you in jail for three years.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:34 AM
3

Regardless of whether i agree or disagree with what you are implying, your comment probably violates the subreddit's rules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Browning
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:53 AM
7

Many encouragingly sensible comments from Alternet users in response to this writer's bit of fascist blither. Good to see.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:50 AM
3

Whoops, i have made a blunder. I was under the impression that the man had only helped to dispose of the body, in which case getting four years less than the woman who actually killed the child would indicate a bias unlikely in similar cases in which the sexes are reversed. As it turns out the bastard pleaded guilty to manslaughter so best to consider this whole post a mistake. Hell, if anything, both of them have gotten sentences far too lenient.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:24 AM
4

Whoops, i have made a blunder. I was under the impression that the man had only helped to dispose of the body, in which case getting four years less than the woman who actually killed the child would indicate a bias unlikely in similar cases in which the sexes are reversed. As it turns out, the bastard pleaded guilty to manslaughter so best to consider this whole post a mistake. Hell, if anything, both of them have gotten sentences far too lenient.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:24 AM
21

"Consider the number of rapes that go unreported. Could this trend possibly be impacted by Reddit threads like /r/rapingwomen or /r/mensrights?"
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:58 AM
2

MSNBC fired Phil Donahue over his anti-war stance, despite his program's huge popularity. Faux progressive is more an apt description.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:35 AM
1

I wouldn't vote for Obama only to be called a racist It was a masterstroke for the plutocracy to put a colored man in the White House -- there must be a huge number of lefties who know he's scum but are afraid of telling their friends lest they be accused of being wearers of pointy white hats.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:33 AM
2

It's easy to flip this one on the feminists. Outline the ways in which women are privileged, then tell them that discrimination against women is cool because they are already swimming in privilege. Alternatively, you could also start screaming "Check you privilege! Check your privilege!" every time they open their lying mouths. PS The quote sounds very much like a scene from Yes Minister...
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:30 AM
3

I wish Gandhi had never been born. People are always quoting him in highly inappropriate ways. How the hell does my not going after the male version of the ad change anything? It doesn't.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:12 AM
5

Time for some of our British readers to complain to the ASA about the female version of the ad. Then we can give the ASA a lot of internet attention when they mysteriously refuse to ban it.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 12:05 PM
3

Please, such posts counter the idea that women don't do this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:58 AM
-1

Give it a few years...
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:57 AM
-5

"'It was an unfortunate incident and misunderstanding,' says her rep" If i ever run into her rep, i will be sure to inflict an unfortunate incident on their face. "Evan Peters refused to press charges" Worthless, weak, spineless behavior and all-too-typical of the American male. As for Emma Roberts, what can you expect from the niece of an asshole like Julia "Eat, Love, Pray" Roberts?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:57 AM
12

"...if a tree falls in the woods and no one hears it, did it rape a feminist on the way down?" Yes. As Marilyn French once told us "All trees are rapists and that's all they are."
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:50 AM
26

Total. Fucking. Moron. What does this shit-brained woman think rapists will do if the penalty for rape is the same as the penalty for murder? They'll kill the victim to keep her quiet! That way, even if they do get caught they can only be executed once! Amazing how misandry blinds some women to their own interests.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:46 AM
2

I have said it before and i'll say it again -- ten years after gay marriage is legalized, gays will be marching in the street demanding that the government make it once again illegal.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:11 AM
1

Rational, my ass. Not really worth reading past the first paragraph.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:57 AM
1

Unsubstantiated claims.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:50 AM
4

Heh, heh.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 12:29 PM
3

Great idea, quotas worked really well for Australia's Labor party, i'm sure they'll be an absolute blessing for corporations.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:02 AM
8

Like everything else, being missing is worse when you are female -- probably because females have such woeful senses of direction.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:54 AM
5

If by "junk" you mean posts in which some asshole outsider tries to tell the rest of us what to do, then yes, we have way too much junk in this place.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:47 AM
3

Link broken.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:36 AM
3

“It’s not like I’m making this stuff up,” said Stephanie Schriock, (EMILY's List) president..." Must be a refreshing change for her.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 01:38 AM
3

Misleading title has wasted my time. If it were compulsory it would be an outrage, being optional it's just a bit of a worry.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 12:44 AM
4

Money grubbing assholes. Timberlake should record a follow-up called "Feminists Can Kiss My Ass."
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:51 AM
2

Soon as i saw it was from the Beeb i knew what it was going to say. Bastards.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:48 AM
4

No. It's all over for the lower classes, but not for men specifically. The worst that can be said is that in 20-30 years the tiny middle class left may be female dominated, but the upper echelons will still be male dominated as will the new, struggling underclass. Hell, middle class jobs will be so precious that even a male dominated workforce will stay in line, thereby making the need for a female dominated, and hence more compliant, workforce a thing of the past.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:11 AM
2

Don't be an asshole -- it makes you look like an asshole.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:03 AM
1

"full of more shit then a septic tank at a camping ground." Literally laughed out loud at that one!
/r/MensRights15/07/13 12:02 AM
2

Unexpecteditem is expectedtroll.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:04 AM
1

Yes, under feminist rules men are allowed to express their emotions -- unless they are pissed off at a woman, then they are misogynists.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:02 AM
37

No mention of teaching them not to be violent towards other males, or of teaching girls not to be violent towards men and children. Because, you know, some types of violence are simply more important than others.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:49 AM
1

Yeah, damn right! It's offensive because it implies that there are times when men are not working! Like we're all a bunch of lazy bastards, or something! PS Is there the faint smell of troll in the air?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:28 AM
12

Go to A Voice for Men, they have all the info.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:08 AM
2

Because people in her situation are usually male, and because, for once, it's nice to see a woman not getting away with bad behavior. That said, a couple of years would seem more appropriate.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:06 AM
2

Yes, her professionalism is quite admirable. I meant that sarcastically, but perhaps she's playing the "You meanies have made a woman crrryyy!" card, in which case it really is professional.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:04 AM
1

Whoa, male or female perp, that's a ludicrous sentence. In some places women get away with actual murder, in this state they can get life for a touchup? Amerika, the developed world's most sick-ass country.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 03:01 AM
2

With a rational and objective title like that, how could i possibly not read the article?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:17 AM
12

Congratulations, you have found yourself some free toilet paper!
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:16 AM
5

"Originally published at Fox News." Caveat lector.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:13 AM
1

You're a liar. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:46 AM
2

You know, there's a word for men obsessed with gay sex, and it aint "heterosexual"!
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:16 AM
5

First, i clearly specified some women, not all. Second, how the fuck does "making" this about women equate to my making everything about women?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:14 AM
3

women are so entitled that some will go so far as to get violent when you don't give them what they want. Amazing, it's almost like you didn't even read my comment...
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:11 AM
2

Heh, heh...
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:10 AM
8

The point in posting it is, presumably, to show that women are so entitled that some will go so far as to get violent when you don't give them what they want.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:47 AM
25

Serves him right for not fulfilling his social obligation to give his money to strange women.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:45 AM
8

Really? I always assumed the reason you called yourself evil was that, like all MRAs, you spend an inordinate amount of time eating babies!
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:39 AM
6

Yep, there was a case a couple of years ago in which some woman in the UK punched a guy. He laughed, she picked up a glass and smashed it into his face. After that, he weren't laughin' no more. Once it gets physical, you don't know how far it's gonna go -- best to just take them out fast as possible.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:34 AM
3

Surely even in gynocentric Britain he can have her charged with assault?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:31 AM
7

Damn, you EvilPundit, you beat me by 56 minutes!
/r/MensRights12/07/13 01:07 AM
0

Oh,please...
/r/MensRights12/07/13 12:59 AM
5

I have no idea what you are saying.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:23 AM
6

In other words, you want us to feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:20 AM
2

Meanwhile, men continue to get less degrees than women...
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:17 AM
1

So, the psychiatric facility at which you reside allows you to use the internet, huh? How very progressive of them.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 10:43 AM
2

YOU MISANDRIST BASTARD! Just wait, i'm going to tell the Sex Discrimination Commissioner on you! She's going to fuck you up! http://www.humanrights.gov.au/about/commissioners/sex-discrimination-commissioner
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:40 AM
3

Not a bad movie, but why it has such a huge cult following is beyond me.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:36 AM
2

"July 09, 2013: Tony Abbott has been accused of sexism after telling a female journalist to 'calm down' when she continued to question him about travel expenses."
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:35 AM
2

Nice try, no cigar. "July 09, 2013: Tony Abbott has been accused of sexism after telling a female journalist to 'calm down' when she continued to question him about travel expenses." The feminist reading is probably that by telling her to calm down he was implying she was being hysterical.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:35 AM
1

Tight Speedos make male genitals look like a couple of budgies stuffed into said Speedos.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:31 AM
0

Yeah, because this has nothing to do with society telling men to put up with all sorts of crap from women, and nothing to do with all the psychological attacks on men contributing to the low self-esteem of some.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:26 AM
2

Too right wing, as i recall.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:21 AM
2

Arguably, indeed. Misogyny is the hatred of women as a group, Michelle is not a group.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:12 AM
1

How very PC of you. Female "bros" makes no sense.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:09 AM
1

What's with all the hate for a bunch of young people who like colorful ponies? Seriously, you are far more fucked up than they are.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:09 AM
2

Due to a recent and intense interest in music ( probably to culminate in about 12 months with a self-penned album of snarky, political songs), i have been buying up music DVDs left, right and center. Today's purchase was a collection of Offspring and i swear, soon as i heard this i thought of all those lame male feminists out there. This thing should be their official theme song.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:25 AM
8

Don't be silly, it doesn't matter how a man puts on his trousers -- it's the very idea of trousers that is misogynist.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:05 AM
5

Your comment history places your last comment on this subreddit as 25 days old, implying that your knowledge of men's rights is very scant. False charges of sexism made against a male politician not a men's rights thing? Fuck off, you cunt.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:03 AM
22

Once again feminists show themselves to be total and utter arseheads. There are a million real things wrong with Abbott, so why make up something?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:00 AM
6

Fuck Ghandi. Motherfucker's philosophies may have worked in his very specific situation, but it is clear from decades of similar wimpishness on the part of the left that such tactics are worthless in most situations.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 06:26 AM
-9

Whoa, that sounds like the kind of comment a rapist would make!
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:54 AM
5

No, but he is on suicide watch, far as i know.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:28 AM
0

How dare you suggest a pegasister would act in such an un-ponylike way!
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:23 AM
-19

I say we test Michelle's sense of humor by stripping her naked and dumping her in the middle of a crowded mall. No harm done, right? Just a joke, that's all.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 02:21 AM
1

I went off her after reading her views on the sexual molestation of boys.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 05:12 AM
-1

Frankly, i think i took places to mean actual prisons rather than spaces in those prisons. My mistake. But keep in mind that for the girls all places are going, for boys it's only most or some.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:55 AM
2

Yeah, you're right. I often forget that these are public arguments, though dozens or hundreds is probably more likely than thousands.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:52 AM
7

"They closed far more spaces for boys than girls, so I think that's a reasonable interpretation." The reason they closed more spaces for boys it that there are more boys in custody. Percentage wise, some boys will still be kept in jail, but no girls. The article clearly states this. Beat the crap out of an old age pensioner and if you're a boy you get the possibility of jail, if you are a girl you do not get the possibility of jail. Seems pretty sexist to me.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 04:50 AM
2

If the captions on the photos of that nerd are anything to go by this guy is full of shit and i have better things to do than sully my mind with feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:31 AM
2

Why even bother to respond? How often have you changed a bigot's mind through argument?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:11 AM
6

they've already closed down many places for boys too. Apparently, two is now "many."
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:53 AM
33

'"Ukip leader Nigel Farage said the decision “shows a deep lack of seriousness in its approach to the scourge of young offending, particularly amongst young women”' Christ, you know the UK is fucked when the guy from UKIP is the one making sense!
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:52 AM
3

So, these are the kind of idiots that get taken seriously in the gaming world, huh? Glad i have nooo interest at all in gaming.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:26 AM
1

Troll.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:17 AM
1

You're the one making excuses for someone feeling up a kid, and i'm the one being creepy? Fuck off.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:41 AM
-2

If your username is anything to go by, you are the one who is in the wrong place. Shouldn't you be complaining about banned games, or some other important issue?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:38 AM
0

Learn to read, moron. Nowhere do i state that men can't be sexually abused. As for maturity, if you think a deliberately insulting joke at the cost of the creepy girls in the pic is immature you are a halfwit. Don't worry though, if the number of downvotes is anything to go by you have at least 49 other pinheads to keep you company. It's the one benefit of having no intellect to speak of -- you are never alone.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:36 AM
-2

Kiss my ass, moron.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:32 AM
14

the girl on the right is, but could be much younger, possibly even his age Yeah, that's why she's a foot taller, cause she's the same age. You are an idiot.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:27 AM
14

Probably the kid's mom... http://tips21.com/videos/images/woman-sucks-dildo-on-cake-while-little-girls-watch-fail.jpg
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:25 AM
-40

Maybe it's just me, but all i can think is that if it was me instead of that kid in the picture i'd be thinking "Silly girls, what's the point of having your mouths open wide when you're still so high up?"
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:24 AM
2

The article is a copy-paste of this one... http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/aifs-bullying-study-shows-girls-are-more-devious/story-fngqim8m-1226665944706
/r/MensRights06/07/13 04:10 AM
4

Thanks for the orders, o' newby. Also, MRA can also stand for Men's Rights Advocate. And what do you mean by "us" regarding the whole Toronto thing? Were you there?
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:24 AM
5

For everyone who hated her specifically for being female there was at least one person who supported her specifically for being female. At worst, she broke even. Take for example the public outrage about the big red box comments compared to the indifference to all the jokes about the male opposition leader's budgie smugglers... http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-aEbGeCd34mg/T6P3UTY7H8I/AAAAAAAAHFo/oGXxJ81jd8o/s1600/Budgie+6.jpg
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:21 AM
10

A man would get a much longer sentence for, in effect, raping these women dozens of times. Find me a similar case in which a man got only 3-6, if you can.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:11 AM
1

"Try google next time, I am sure even you could figure that out." Yeah, that's what i'm going to do. Every time i feel like mentioning a law i will google to check if it's still in effect even if it's a law that has stood for almost two decades. Hey, jackass, did you google for articles in the last 24 hours -- you know just in case things have changed since November 7, 2012...
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:00 AM
4

TIL there aren't enough women wearing eye patches and going "Harrrrrr!"
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:20 AM
-2

Liberal? Don't they lock people up for life after three non-violent felonies? Doesn't sound too liberal to me.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:18 AM
5

And she's a conservative! Remember, boys, the conservatives are our friends -- it's only them liberal meanies what is oppressing us. Heh, heh...
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:56 AM
-4

Yeah, that's it, tell the guy to put it on a subreddit with a paltry 1000 readers -- that'll work well.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:50 AM
4

I'm confused. Is this an attack on men or on women? Sounds like the girly in the picture is doing the boys a favor by telling them what's really going on inside women's heads.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:48 AM
6

And why do they take those jobs? In part it's because they are taught to, because it's the "manly" thing to do.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:43 AM
5

Strange, i would have expected 100% of men who die in the UK workplace to be male. Perhaps this anomaly explains the silence from the politicians et al -- they are trying to figure out where the bloody hell all these female men are coming from!
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:41 AM
11

Don't count on it. As i recall, there are already feminists trying to do away with the things, and that's before they even exist.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 11:18 AM
1

Saw it years ago, it's a classic!
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:34 AM
4

In other breaking news, the folks at Stormfront hate blacks and Jews.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:32 AM
2

"Personally"? This isn't personal, it's political, it's a matter of morality, it's a matter of doing what's right.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:30 AM
2

"the key idea of both MRAs and feminists is equality under the law and equal rights." Funny. Now go away, you arrogant little sod.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 01:28 AM
2

I kid you not... http://thepigmancometh.com/2010/02/02/un-denying-men-food-in-haiti/ http://thepigmancometh.com/2010/02/08/the-hatred-driving-the-un/
/r/MensRights03/07/13 11:03 AM
3

Until she starts trying to actually do something about men's problems, i will have to assume she eschews the word only in order to not come across like a strident bitch.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:59 AM
1

Oh, and check out the comments! Some hilarious blitherings there, but what can you expect from jackasses who actually pay for the right to comment on this crap ( last time i looked you had to get a paid subscription to have the right to comment on this site)!?!?
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:57 AM
2

I couldn't even read past this first, outrageous paragraph... "If I were to compare the effect of religion on the health, wealth and happiness of humankind with the effect of, say, feminism, I suspect feminism would win easily. Feminism has never airbrushed men out of the picture — either literally or metaphorically. It has never raised an army, never armed itself and never passed laws restricting the equal rights or opportunities of others. There may have been terrorists who were also feminists…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:49 AM
2

If true, this is probably the only good thing feminism has done. Of course, it isn't true. Feminism simply dresses chivalry in a different garb and calls it things like affirmative action.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:38 AM
1

Yeah, Mike the hitman does that. What amazed me was that he later admitted to his sexism!
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:22 AM
0

Endless_Idiocy is more like it.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:20 AM
-1

Obviously.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 02:18 AM
2

Just one more reason to watch a very, very fine show.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:39 PM
6

Gus Fring (chicken man) made it all very explicit when Walter was going to quit... "And a man, a man provides. And he does it even when he's not appreciated, or respected, or even loved. He simply bears up and he does it. Because he's a man."
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:13 PM
11

Not openly, no. But when you look at the opinions being expressed and the issues being discussed in the popular media it is obvious that there are quite a few sympathizers working behind the scenes. Take Breaking Bad, the entire thing could be seen as an exploration of the masculine myths that Walter White has bought into -- provide for the family no matter what, be successful, be the best -- even if what you are the best at is fucking vile.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:04 PM
8

Future, my ass! The little bastard is raping them right now -- with his eyes.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:56 AM
10

There's a word for people who look at small children in innocent situations and think of sex.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 11:53 AM
2

Surprising.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 11:10 AM
6

Here's what most of these women should be posting... "My boyfriend isn't allowed to tell my psychiatrist i've escaped from the asylum."
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:09 AM
2

A joke explained is a joke undone.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:05 AM
2

Couldn't even get past the first few lines. The person who wrote this is clearly deranged and so, probably, is your sister. Try to convince the latter to get sterilized so the madness won't be passed on to another generation, you owe it to your family.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:02 AM
4

Sonja didn't, so i did. I'll bet they downvote the fuck out of it.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:04 AM
4

Tell me about it. This new development must have come from someone else in the Government. Check out this fine bit of femiprop on her own site... http://prugoward.com.au/Media/MediaReleases/tabid/93/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/140/IT-STOPS-HERE-UNITED-EFFORT-TO-END-DOMESTIC-AND-FAMILY-VIOLENCE-IN-NSW.aspx
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:57 AM
6

Yeah, it was Goward who made it legal for women to have their own gyms but kept it illegal for men to do the same. She once blamed the barbarity of the Aus parliament on it being male dominated despite almost certainly knowing that the equally male dominated US Congress is much, much more civilized. Also, she was once on a panel show in which some cow of a woman asked if she should lie to her boyfriend about being on the pill in order to get pregnant, and Goward said "Yes."
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:45 AM
1

While i'm not exactly dropping out, i do avoid looking at cute kiddies and opt instead to look at cute kitties and doggies. Things being what they are, i will probably end up being accused of being a zoophile on the prowl.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:38 AM
2

Fuck Carter and all his ilk.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:34 AM
4

The correct answer is C.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:27 AM
-7

I agree with the feminists -- the guy should have sped up...
/r/MensRights01/07/13 12:15 AM
6

It all started right after birth -- like all boys i was significantly more likely to die in an accident from ages 0-6 months. Quite a mystery, given that most babies can't even crawl at that age.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:09 AM
3

We vilify her because we know her better than the rest of the world. Also, we aren't feminist scum like CNN.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 03:58 AM
1

"Not all wominz is like that!!! Not all wominz is like that!!!" then you run up the street screaming, arms waving wildly in the air. Here's a clue to what can be expected -- one of the women reported the list, several others drew it up.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 03:52 AM
1

Time to get a lawyer. Also, time to name the company so we can tell them what we think.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 03:47 AM
1

Because they know a waste of time when they see it?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:30 AM
3

One line? You really think this is all that the feminists don't get?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:25 AM
10

Your husband is a moron. Most boys these days are not circumcised, so why would the kid be bullied for being the rule rather than the exception? Really, when they cut off your husband's foreskin they must have taken part of his brain.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:23 AM
6

And this is a member of the conservative party. Can you imagine what some of the labor women are doing behind closed doors? Weeping, wailing, gnashing of teeth, and rending of garments would be my guess.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:18 AM
8

And yes, a future Wong government is quite likely. In the party of affirmative action, it is a given that someone who is not only female but also gay and Asian will eventually get the job. Just imagine, every time she makes an asshole of herself she will be able to play three cards, not just one!
/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:20 AM
1

Of course he does -- he is, after all, a spin doctor.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:00 AM
8

Not quite life. She can seek -- and being female, probably receive -- parole in seven years. Fuck the law.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 02:49 AM
0

The conservatives may very well respond to a Labor putting up a woman by putting up their own woman in an attempt to claw back the female vote, so official affirmative action by the left sometimes results in un-official affirmative action by the right.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:15 AM
1

Of course they are treated fairly! How dare you suggest that women are capable of being sexist, you misogynist, patriarchal neanderthal! PS Check your privilege, Mr Man.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:53 AM
1

I never get this kind of reaction -- probably due to my speaking softly and carrying a concrete-filled rubber chicken.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:50 AM
2

Lesson learnt -- next time i see a woman in distress i will run away and hide in the nearest alley.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 02:44 AM
4

"It's probably the main reason I cancelled my subscription, way back in the nineties." But, my god, man, what do you do when you run out of toilet paper!?!?!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:55 AM
7

"Being the first female prime minister makes Gillard a heroine, not just of the Labor Party, but for her gender." Yeah, i'm sure the women of Australia are deeply grateful that the country's first female PM will be remembered as a joke who got into parliament on affirmative action, got the PM's job through treachery, couldn't even hold on to the female vote, and refused to leave the job even when it was clear she was leading her party to annihilation!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:53 AM
2

You might want to look into the whole Matthew Johns thing. As i recall, he got tarred and she didn't even accuse him and his mates of rape, just kinda, sorta implied it.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:47 AM
2

Let me guess, you could tell it was them because every other word was "faggot"!
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:43 AM
2

This cartoon has a credibility problem -- the woman is far too attractive to be a feminist.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 10:42 AM
2

I'll get back to you when i decide which i hate more, the asshole feminists or the asshole Republicans...
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:36 AM
3

Sick.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:35 AM
1

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 06:24 AM
4

A woman with only one positive trait -- unlike a certain male politician she didn't cry when she lost the job. Really, that's the only good thing about this international embarrassment.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:49 AM
0

Never, ever trust academia. It is there primarily to serve the ruling interests.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:33 AM
1

Wow, how very irrelevant.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:23 AM
3

She got in on an affirmative action seat, on that alone she had it easier. Dozens of jokes about Abbott's genitals, no one gave a shit. One joke about her big red box, massive outrage. Then of course there's the fact that she can blame her lack of popularity on sexism, no man can get away with that one.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:05 AM
0

Which is why asking her if her partner (and by implication, Gillard herself ) was gay was okay. If she's in the closet it would explain why she is against gay marriage -- it helps her to maintain the facade. I have no idea which way she swings, of course.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:48 PM
2

Policies will probably be more left wing under Rudd, part of the reason he was knifed was so that things like the mining tax would get watered down. As for why she is so unpopular, mostly it is because Labor voters have never forgiven her for betraying Rudd, an outcome that Rudd's detractors would have predicted if they weren't so busy hating him.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:45 PM
7

Massive affirmative action fail has nothing to do with men's rights? Bull. Her playing of the gender card and failing miserably has nothing to do with men's rights? Bull. As for her not instigating the knifing, even if that were true so what? She was a major and indispensable part of the most outrageous moment in Aus politics since the dismissal and that is why she copped so much hatred, not because of sexism. If anything in this entire affair is a stain on the nation it is Gillard herself, a po…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:19 PM
20

Yeah, i also am fine with a woman getting it if she deserves it. Problem is that this particular woman got into parliament on a women's only seat and got the job by stabbing her leader in the back -- she did not deserve it.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:07 PM
28

Sure he can, he said most men get nowhere near it, he didn't say most people who do get near it are not men.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:22 PM
8

Playing the gender card not only to the bitter end, but actually past it! Fact is, for every asshole who gave her a hard time for being a woman there was at least one asshole giving her an easier time for being a woman. Overall, Gillard had it easier for being a woman.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:16 PM
6

Good news for Australia's lower classes, and even though Rudd is something of a feminist himself, Gillard's failure gives the whole affirmative action thing a huge black eye -- Gillard got into parliament on one of Labor's women-only seats -- and may also show that people have wised up and are now less susceptible to unfounded claims of misogyny.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:23 AM
2

If only it were so in the real world.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:30 AM
1

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=budgie%20smugglers http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-aEbGeCd34mg/T6P3UTY7H8I/AAAAAAAAHFo/oGXxJ81jd8o/s1600/Budgie+6.jpg
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:26 AM
7

No such thing as benevolent sexism, it is just a weasely term for female privilege.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:46 AM
6

"Should she aspire to politics, how do I explain she will grow up reading media where female politicians are excoriated on far harsher basis than men? That they are subject to vulgar jokes based on their anatomy?" Unlike John Howard, who was never mocked for looking like a gnome, and Tony Abbott, who has never been mocked for his "budgie smugglers."
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:44 AM
0

Still waiting on the links to all those "good" feminists expressing outrage over this case.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 05:23 AM
1

Two years old.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 03:00 AM
6

“I want to know why no one helped her!” Hamlin’s mother, Jeanine, 52, said tearfully last week in her Central Islip home. " Because the male sex has been demonized to the point where many are afraid to do anything that could be seen as overstepping their boundaries.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:59 AM
0

He should be in jail for being Berlusconi, not for having it off with a girl who is actually above the age of consent. Feminists and leftists ganging up on a man they both hate, that's all this is.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:55 AM
2

More likely would be a massive social media campaign to get the victim locked up for having made the perpetrators look bad.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:28 AM
0

Really? What? Where? Do you have any links from feministing, jezebel, any of the other usual suspects?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:27 AM
1

I guess the feminists are right, rape is tolerated by American society -- but only when the victim is male.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:26 AM
-1

Can of petrol. Cigarette lighter. Five minutes alone. That's my idea of a just sentence for this piece of scum.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:16 AM
1

No shit! Why do you think i am insisting on the biological definition of sex?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 01:44 AM
0

You are a tiresome little shit who does nothing but keep repeating the same discredited arguments. Stop wasting my time.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 01:41 AM
-1

Oh, please. Just like this other clown you are trying to use the hybrid to deny the existence of that which is not a hybrid.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:03 AM
-2

Wow, very impressive use of philosophical jargon, too bad you still have not explained how one can be a woman yet not have a vagina etc. As for your claim that it is my definition that ignores empirical evidence, you are either a troll or truly insane. Again, adult+female+human = woman. Take any of those out of the equation and you cannot have a woman. Adult + female + giraffe does not equal woman, neither does adult+male+human. This also is bull... "Does a woman who has a mastectomy (or hystere…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:00 AM
-6

Don't know why i even bother, but you are an idiot. A woman is an adult female human. No vagina, no ovaries, no mammary glands, no female hence no woman. This is all very obvious to those of us who can think logically. If you are stupid enough to think that intersex people refute that fact then you are no doubt stupid enough to think that Obama being mulatto somehow refutes the idea that his dad was black and his mom was white. Apparently, since Ligers exist, lions and tigers do not. Do me a fav…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:50 AM
8

Strewth, it's me bloody ex-wife! Seriously though, soon as she got in their faces they should have grabbed her and thrown her out. Trespassing and then behaving in a threatening manner? Even a gynocentric country like Aus would side with the guys in this case.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:50 AM
-9

No vagina, no woman. Pardon me for being rational instead of PC.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:33 AM
4

As it happens, i don't agree with Kerr's statement, it seems rather condescending towards men. What really gets me is that she's saying this on Faux News -- it's not as bad as Hugh Jackman shilling for Walmart, but it is damn suspect.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 02:01 AM
2

Serves you right for having feminist friends.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:52 AM
1

What the hell is a Wil Wheaton?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:47 AM
1

Violence is more common in the third world, and that includes domestic violence. Not to mention that a lot of third world countries are places where, unlike the West, women really are discriminated against. The idea that DV is seen as acceptable in the West is a feminist lie, the idea that it is seen as acceptable in Africa, South America etc is far more credible.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:43 AM
2

Actual report here... http://www.who.int/gender/violence/who_multicountry_study/en/
/r/MensRights23/06/13 06:08 AM
6

According to a discussion raging at the Australian subreddit the countries used in the study are third world except for New Zealand, which is probably not too far from being third world. As for the report itself here is what i had to say at R/Aus... “The Study focused on violence by male partners only, mainly because most intimate partners of women throughout the world are male.” Or to put it another way, “If we had asked lesbians we would have found similar levels of violence and that would hav…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:56 AM
-1

Sorry ladies, but i can't be as feminine as Hugh Jackman -- i'm straight. Heh, heh.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 05:38 AM
-3

No, women don't care. Except about themselves, but that hardly needs to be pointed out.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:49 AM
6

"and I have become gradually more and more hopeless about society's future." The future is fucked, but it's a lot more fun to go down swinging than to get shot in the back. " And women like the pedestal they are standing on." Except for the actual standing, that's too much like hard work. "And here's why.Most women will ALWAYS fight for Team Woman, right or wrong." No, the real reason is that feminism is an ally of the plutocracy and hence has their support. Don't kid yourselves, boys, if the pl…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:38 AM
-1

I look forward to the day when i can drop it, for that will be the day when the majority of the apes actually start thinking.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:02 AM
1

If she's going with the 3 mps' wishes it is probably out of her own free will -- it certainly is the kind of thing her ideology supports. As for quotas for members of the bewanged sex ( members of the sex with members, so to speak ) that would be the height of misogyny and the poor dear would probably tear out her hair and run screaming through the street if anyone in her party had the guts to suggest it.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 06:28 AM
0

Because most people are unthinking apes who believe whatever the media tells them no matter how much it contradicts the reality that surrounds them.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:35 AM
7

I am honestly puzzled. Does Gillard think her vote amongst men is too high? I have never seen this woman as stupid -- evil, sexist, dishonest, treacherous, weak, but not stupid -- but perhaps i have been wrong.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:29 AM
1

Total asshole of a woman. Funnily enough, this female chauvinist is good evidence for the idea that we need a male version of Lulu. LouLou, perhaps. Heh, heh.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 02:12 AM
3

Fucked if i know. The thing that pisses me off is that she is assuming the victim is female and implying that the perp is male. Apparently in her world, women, whether gay or straight, do not commit rape.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:21 AM
2

Two downvotes and you're complaining? Maybe the internet isn't for you.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:14 AM
2

Oh, yeah? What about when the woman is the rapist? Is it not her fault then?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:13 AM
2

Stop wasting my time, troll scum.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:00 AM
3

Yeah, making fun of Stone's career and Dworkin's weight is on the same level as the hatred and contempt displayed in these feminist quotes. Fuck off back to Idiotville.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 10:47 AM
1

Better yet, he should ask his wife to start going to a different doctor. You know, one that isn't a female supremacist cow.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:01 AM
4

Your body, her choice. Welcome to the covert matriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 05:00 AM
2

Where are the mods when a lying turd like this succeeds in distracting some of use from the real issue? Really, this comment should be deleted.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:50 AM
2

Go stick your face in a fan, dirtbag.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:47 AM
-2

‘But I like the idea of getting married – I would enjoy that.’ Mentally ill, obviously.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:41 AM
89

“The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.” — Sharon Stone Luckily, neither her fame nor her power lasted for more than five minutes. PS You used the Dworkin quote twice. Was this an accident, or because she was twice the size of the other feminists?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:39 AM
3

Yes. Obviously, duh.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:41 AM
5

I don't see how it will hit them in the face. The plutocrats get a workforce that is easier to bully as they make the transition from humans to self checkouts and automated kiosks, and the feminists get to yell "You go, girl!" for a couple of decades. Of course, once most workers, including females, become obsolete, we will all be reduced to a Hobbesian underclass so i guess at least the feminists will be getting hit in the face.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:53 AM
3

Repugnant piece of crap needs a few weeks in a motherfucking jail where she can find out what it is like to be sexually assaulted by someone twice her size. As for the kid, partly he seems to be taking it as a joke but partly he's clearly embarrassed and possibly even scared given that this huge cow keeps grabbing him by the throat. You might well get the same reaction with the sexes reversed but nobody would be using that as an excuse.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:41 AM
12

"It takes a very special kind of nastiness to assume that the presence of a quota must mean the absence of merit." Can't even bother reading past that moronic claim. Gillard got into parliament going up against one woman, if the seat wasn't female-only she would have had to slug it out with one woman and several men. Maybe if she had been tough enough to do that she wouldn't always be crying about misogyny.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:27 AM
2

The plutocracy and the feminists must be ecstatic.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 02:20 AM
1

Big deal, everything we do or say is used to make us look bad. If we went out and saved the lives of a dozen kittens the SPLC would somehow find a way to make us look bad for doing so.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 01:50 AM
7

Yes. That was always part of the idea behind the second wave. Make men less assertive and you make life easier for those who want to push us around, be they women or the plutocrats. When i say "men" i mean the lower class men, of course -- not much lack of assertiveness amongst the Cheney's and Murdoch's of the world.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:13 AM
1

Yeah, i got this absurd piece of idiocy in my inbox. I sent them this reply "Unless you want me to unsubscribe stop sending me feminist bullshit." I fucking mean it, too. Getup do a lot of good work, but trying to increase female privilege is fucking contemptible.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:04 AM
0

Gee, i don't know, maybe because the post was about Norway and not these other countries you mention?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 03:53 AM
2

Er, say what?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:15 PM
-2

Fuck Norway. The only people drafted into the army should be the bitches and bastards who start the wars.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:17 AM
4

Jaclyn Friedman is the asshole censoring Facebook, for those who don't already know.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:41 AM
30

I suspect the real reason many men find them uncomfortable is because they aren't allowed to do anything except nod and agree, lest they be accused of "misogyny," whatever that word means these days.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:47 AM
0

"I have no idea how good Tony will be as a PM but surely he must be better then Julia has been?" He's a nightmare in waiting. Best thing for Aus would be a labor win without that sexist, affirmative-action-loving piece of turd at the helm.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:21 AM
0

"Is there any meaning in the fact that there's only one? No freaking idea. " It suggests that she got there on merit rather than on affirmative action.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:19 AM
1

"I do believe that it is harder to be a female politician in Australia than to be a male politician." Except for those female-only seats and people who know you are shit being afraid to speak out lest they be branded misogynists. Heh, heh.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:15 AM
1

"Former PM John Howard copped heaps of shit for being short" And you can bet your life men are more sensitive about being short than women are about having big asses -- some men like big asses, few women are into short men -- yet mocking his height was perfectly acceptable. Then there's all the crap about Abbott's budgie smugglers. Can you imagine the media getting away with mocking a female politician's bad case of camel toe?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:12 AM
0

You obviously hang out with some total boofheads. Tell me, if it's misogyny why are most women also against her?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:09 AM
13

Always amazed at how people lump violence against women and violence against children together given that most violence against children is actually committed by women!
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:48 AM
1

Ugh, look at the shit eating grin on that revolting animal's hideous face!
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:20 AM
1

Troll.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:21 AM
-3

Yeah, but with male billionaires it's some or most, with female billionaires it's virtually all!
/r/MensRights16/06/13 05:55 AM
-5

Yeah, you go girl! Girls roooock!
/r/MensRights16/06/13 05:54 AM
3

"Something seems to have happened with the introduction of “gonzo” porn. The traditional boundaries of the acceptable depiction were pushed to a new limit.This porn involves sexual performance in which the male actor violates or appears to harm the female performer, depicting sex acts that no actual woman would want to engage in." Apparently the women in gonzo porn are really being violated and they are not actual women, just very realistic sex dolls, i suppose. From a non feminist i might think…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:02 AM
2

Most people who rule the world are white men, but most white men do not rule the world. Hell, most of them don't even rule their own families!
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:51 AM
4

HaHa! I hope this piece of shit spends the rest of her worthless life living in a cardboard box and eating stale hot dogs she dug out of a dumpster.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:36 AM
1

See, part of the reason Gillard is so loathed is that she lies like a dog. The Australian parliament is like a verbal version of one of those Battle Royales they have in the pro wrestling world. You have to see it to believe how vicious and puerile it is. Any woman who can take that is highly unlikely to be kept out of politics for fear that she will be asked a personal question by some DJ, and Gillard knows it.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:12 AM
2

If "a waste of time" justifies dismissal all DJs would be fired. It is our business if the PM has spent years lying about her relationship, especially given that she opposes gay marriage. She has no husband, he's her beard, er, i mean boyfriend.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:39 AM
14

No. If you mean "people" you say "people" not "women." Gillard is a lawyer and a politician, she knows word choice is important. As for nobody asking a male politician such a question, this seems unlikely. In fact, if there were rumors like this regarding a male PM he would probably be asked a lot sooner than Gillard. As for "especially the PM," that is a load of classist shit.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:21 AM
10

No.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:55 AM
64

''I want young girls and women to be able to feel like they can be included in public life and not have to face questioning like the questioning I faced yesterday,'' Which nicely implies that such questions would be fine for men but not for women. Gillard is scum, plain and simple. Her mission in life seems to be to increase female privilege at any cost as long as it isn't to herself.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:54 AM
4

Here's a clue, don't get drunk and you won't be having to worry about this kind of crap.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:12 AM
1

No. Rumors about both him and her have been around for years. That's not exactly out of the blue.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:35 AM
25

They are right. Male creations like sanitation and medicine are the main reason why people are living so long -- if women didn't live so long they wouldn't get old enough to go menopausal, hence menopause is indeed the fault of men. We could also take an etymological approach and point out that it aint called the menopause for nothin'.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:35 AM
4

Advice from Stormtroopers? And fictional ones at that! Fuck whoever wrote this shit.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 06:31 AM
2

If she has her way, 80% of Amerika's college graduates will be female -- and even then she will complain about the misogyny of it all.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:22 AM
-1

"men need to learn to take care of themselves" This isn't a man, he's a little boy. Also, there is nothing to stop you crying over a dead pet one day and beat some guy up the next. No need to be a one dimensional cardboard cutout, you know.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:20 AM
0

I would be more than glad to act like a big boy -- by smashing the kid's callous, and emotionally abusive, piece-of-shit dad in the face.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:18 AM
46

Misandry aint real, haven't you heard?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:08 AM
-1

This woman should be thrown into a men's jail for three days. Fair's fair.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:08 AM
1

You could be right on the custody thing, i really can't be bothered to look it up.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:03 AM
1

No, you are not a fanatic, you just have shit taste when it comes to friends.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:47 AM
1

You're right about the first one, i confused the whole thing with the issue of who spends more time with kids within a nuclear family .The question then is, who is more likely to abuse kids, a single mom or a single dad. As for anecdotal evidence, when it is all that is available, that's what you have to use. PS What is your explanation for the insurance question, then?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:34 AM
1

"Child abuse data doesn't control for the sex of the custodial parent, so while it is a good number to know it's not relevant here." Of course it's relevant. What, you think spending more time with kiddies is an excuse for beating them to death? "And everything else you cited is just anecdotal as far as I know." Anecdotal is all that is available in this area.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:06 PM
0

"it went down well" Only because most people are like you -- they have shit for brains.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:39 AM
1

So a husband should have to give permission for his wife to donate her eggs?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:05 AM
3

My body, your choice.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:04 AM
4

Kevin Rudd, the man she knifed in order to get the PM's job, has chosen today to wear, you guessed it, a blue tie. Heh, heh... http://www.news.com.au/national-news/federal-election/kevin-rudd-declares-war-on-julia-gillard-with-bluetie-choice/story-fnho52qo-1226662394386
/r/MensRights12/06/13 01:50 AM
2

Oh, please.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:56 AM
3

Oh, she knows. She has many a flaw but being uninformed about women's views is not one of them -- she just lies a lot when it comes to gender.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:55 AM
1

Women abuse their children more than men do, and most examples i see of people risking their lives for their kiddies are men. Shit, even most people risking their lives for someone else's kids are men. Based on these facts i come to the conclusion that women don't care about their kids as much as men do. Obvious really, unless one is an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:53 AM
1

Sure there is.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:49 AM
4

Concerned, huh? PS Get stuffed.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:47 PM
52

"Prime Minister Julia Gillard has warned women will be "banished" from politics and abortion will be "the political plaything of men" if the Opposition wins the election." I can only assume that she then ran screaming through the streets.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:44 PM
0

Well, do you have a better explanation? If so let's hear it.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:40 PM
-2

They just don't care about their families as much as men do.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:34 AM
2

If women really believe that the things in the list are signs of immaturity, they are even dumber than i thought.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:31 AM
2

I'd like to slam her face through a wall. No, wait, it looks as if someone has already done that.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:18 AM
0

Retard.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:37 AM
17

Tickets to a show, a few bucks. The opportunity to be outraged, priceless.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:17 PM
11

Scumbag feminists strike again. They're an ideology of evil, nothing more. On the other hand, i can't say i approve of this dude insulting whores by comparing them to feminists.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 02:15 PM
1

"Under the Soviet Union... Every organ of society was repurposed to achieve a utopian society, as imagined by communism." Thanks are due the writer for telling me early on that he is full of shit. Soviet communism was an attempt at a utopian society? All that inequality, starvation, and Gulags were about creating a utopia were they? The Soviets may have claimed to be communists but, then, feminists claim to be about equality yet their actions show otherwise.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:38 AM
1

It's an outrage! A violation of human rights! An attack on all that is good and decent! I demand that we find the people who committed this atrocity and hang them by their thumbs till they promise to never do such an evil thing ever again! /s
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:33 AM
0

Sniff, sniff, there's that particular odor again...
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:30 AM
5

Funny thing is, the stupid bastard actually sounded like he was bragging. Any way, the vaccine is available for both boys and girls in Aus.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:28 AM
0

Right wing blitherings, nothing more. Really, i've met feminists with better reasoning powers. Honest to god, feminists!
/r/MensRights10/06/13 12:27 AM
0

Yes No, and i am insulted you would even ask. Giving everyone the same opportunities, having everyone treated the same by the law and letting them get ahead based on their own talents not on class or female privilege. No. No more than a white supremacist can. Er, too complex a question given how difficult it is to define a postmodernist. Is not the entire idea of egalitarianism a modern one? If so then perhaps the answer is no. Depends what your definition of patriarchy is. No. Equality of outco…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:18 AM
8

Oh, don't worry. I'm sure it was all just some sort of postmodernist irony that's been taken totally out of context. Heh, heh...
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:05 AM
3

What kind of bullshit? It's the kind of bullshit common in Australia. You know, the country being run by a feminist cow who got into parliament through affirmative action then go the job of PM by stabbing her male boss in the back.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:46 AM
0

I find this is the best way to handle such people... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpNtbyz3DEE
/r/MensRights09/06/13 05:35 AM
0

This is probably it. In fact, it is probably too moderate.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 05:26 AM
8

There hangs in the air a faint odor, as of a creature usually found lurking under a bridge -- or in a basement.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:00 AM
-2

It has little to do with liberal vs conservative. Feminism is, first of all, a plutocratic project, and second a female privilege project. As long as their rich masters allow them to thrive, feminists will work on making things even better for their sex. If this means being liberal they will be liberal, if it means being conservative they will be conservative.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 02:21 AM
1

Equality movement, my ass. You do that and we will be flooded with feminists more interested in female privilege than equality.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 02:14 AM
1

Stabbing husband:bad. Shitting on cops:cool.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 11:08 AM
2

"Also, is he still obscure if he's touring internationally?" I had no idea he existed till this happened, though i had heard about the goat commercial which it turns out was his doing. Probably not so obscure to rap fans, i guess.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 11:05 AM
3

He's an American.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:54 AM
1

I don't know how to feel about this one. On one hand, she tried to frame her husband, but on the other hand she tried to kill the guy running the Evil Empire...
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:13 AM
2

Because terrorists have a political or social agenda, not a personal one.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:11 AM
-1

FYI, once i have tagged someone as a troll i no longer read their posts.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:15 AM
-1

Oh, please.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:00 AM
2

Delete the concern trolls' posts and comments, obviously.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:58 AM
5

Yes, o' holder of a day-old account, we shall do exactly as you say.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:05 AM
1

"Feminists themselves are not evil. Their ideas are wrong but they believe they are doing good." You are either lying or unspeakably naive.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:02 AM
4

Not keen on Winslet at all, but i find it much more worrisome that someone dumb enough to change his name to Ned Rocknroll is about to pass on his apparently defective genes.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:53 AM
-4

Before reading this post i already had you tagged as a possible troll, does that give you a clue? What's insulting is that we get such obvious trolls, it's like you guys think we is stoopid.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:48 AM
-8

That's what's going on, all right, but as usual our mods are too gutless to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:46 AM
12

Meh, i considered posting this story earlier today but the article i read made it pretty clear that it was his bi-polar acting up, not the pressures associated with being male and/or gay so i don't see the relevance to the MRM.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:32 AM
-8

There's a reason i have you tagged as a troll.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:23 AM
-5

"Although Chambliss decried sexual assault in the military and said he wants to do more to stop it, his comments echo the "boys will be boys" mentality that has been used throughout the years to dismiss sexual harassment and assault and avoid taking action to prevent them."
/r/MensRights06/06/13 06:22 AM
-5

"Although Chambliss decried sexual assault in the military and said he wants to do more to stop it, his comments echo the "boys will be boys" mentality that has been used throughout the years to dismiss sexual harassment and assault and avoid taking action to prevent them." So if he had said that blacks are more likely to end up in prison due to some sort of innate biological difference, that would be seen as making excuses for black criminals, would it?
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:19 AM
1

"Women and children first." I have no objection to the media emphasizing child victims, the poor bastards lose a lot more if they die young than as adults. It's the woman thing that pisses me off.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:14 AM
1

Don't mention Jesus.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 02:01 AM
2

"She seems to be a realist (although I admit that I have not read any of her works) and uses her head." Her brains come and go as they please. She has visions of Jeebus and crucified an old man for supposedly touching her leg while she was in university.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 01:30 AM
3

So what if she moved to Amerika when young? She's still Pakistani.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 11:04 AM
2

"Legalise it though the use of brothels and you keep the girls safe and get rid of the pimps and other problems that surround it." That's how it is in NSW, Aus and most sex workers seem to approve.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:25 AM
1

I posted the same comment as above at their site and of course, not being in line with feminist and PC sensibilities, it didn't make it past the mods. On the other hand maybe it's not censorship, it's just that being a Pigman i am not Halal.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:22 AM
10

"Zainab Khan was born in Peshawar, Pakistan..." You are an idiot. Kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:18 AM
1

Intellectually base and mentally deranged as they are, to compare the Manhood Academy to trolls is to unfairly tar the latter.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:00 AM
40

"Feminist resorts to name-calling, shaming, and swearing when she is presented with facts." No shit?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:24 AM
16

Hey, at least they only hate your hijab, they don't go around pack raping you like your Pakistani men do white women (and girls as young as eleven). You want male privilege? Look to your own culture before attacking that of others, you racist hypocrite.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 01:18 AM
5

And you know what they say, if it bleeds it leads.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:44 PM
52

Sadly predictable, though even i am amazed at how quickly they got round to it.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:20 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:55 AM
1

Wait a bloody minute, if the Dr is capable of becoming a woman he would no longer be the last Gallifreyan! He could simply store some of his own sperm then impregnate himself when he becomes female! No more "Oh woe, i am the last of my race!" That would be a pretty big change to suddenly have Time Lords all over the place!
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:47 AM
-1

That would be misogynist, and probably kinda gay as well -- two good reasons for feminists to hate even more on everyone's favorite Gallifreyan.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:45 AM
2

I hereby call for Buffy to be rebooted with a male in the lead role. As for Watson, if we must suffer a female Dr Who then let it at least be someone other than this Plain Jane.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:43 AM
8

For those who don't know, this Friedman scumbag is the woman behind the current attempts to turn Facebook into another arm of NOW.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:42 AM
-1

Ewww, who'd a thunk a woman who looks like a close relative of Andrea Dworkin could afford to be so fussy?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:37 AM
-3

No. You are assuming that most people witnessing the debate are rational enough to evaluate arguments on their intellectual content. Most people are pretty dumb and will tend to side with the person who scores the most points in terms of rhetoric (minus the Logos, needless to say) and psychological damage inflicted on the enemy. Add to that the basic weakness of most of the enemy and the ability to drive some of the lying scum out of the discourse by verbally beating them up and you are asking u…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:31 AM
0

In this case it could simply be because he is kinda famous, and they, presumably, are not.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:49 AM
4

"Lili Evans, 15, is one of the women..." A woman at 15, how 'bout that? Good example of how truly stupid the lower ranks of feminists are.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:56 AM
-3

Women don't give a toss about men's rights, not even when the men in question are their own brothers and sons.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:43 AM
0

Troooollll.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:11 AM
2

Most people inclined towards such heroic behavior are male, hence most people victimized by the crap attitude show by this school are male. Also, i do not agree with those claiming that a girl would be treated the same way. If the treatment of pseudo heroines like Jessica Lynch is anything to go by, this girl would have had her heroism celebrated not denigrated.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 10:16 AM
2

Subtly concerned, huh?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 10:12 AM
-1

This post again...
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:45 AM
2

Oh, please... Folks, can't we get some clever trolls in this place? Some lame brain with a brand new account is just not good enough.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 05:37 AM
12

" I struggled to overcome a powerful animal feeling within. Violence. Female violence." The inner Bonobo strikes again.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:52 AM
6

"Nobody likes angry people. Especially not angry men." I guess the world you live in does not contain any Bill O'Reillys. "It scares some." Yeah, some times it scares them into doing the right thing. I've got news for you, MRAs have been trying the nice guy route for many years and it gets them nowhere. Paul Elam has brought our issues as much attention in a few years as Warren Farrell has in thirty years. Nice guys finish last, so take your advice and shove it.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:40 AM
1

Clap.Trap.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:31 AM
2

Seems Beyonce got her ass touched by some male fan in the audience of a live gig, so she told him “I will have you escorted out right now, alright?” which is a justified thing to do but not exactly an act of heroism. "Rumor has it that the fan was allowed to stay for the rest of the show. (What gives?)" What gives is that, as bad as she is, Beyonce is apparently not as misandrist a cow as the writer of this piece. Not to mention that her tone makes it clear that it is a warning, not a threat to …
/r/MensRights01/06/13 02:27 AM
4

Yeah, "real" men don't buy girls, they just cheat on their wives. Fuck you, Ashton Kutcher, you lame-brained, hypocritical jackass.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:13 AM
5

It's offensive -- to Chris Brown.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:07 AM
1

And what the fuck is Sean Connery doing in that photo? Charming? He admits to slapping women around, for fuck's sake!!!
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:06 AM
2

Far as i'm concerned, lack of charm is a good thing, but no prizes for guessing how the female who wrote this article sees it. As for the woman she quotes as approving of American males calling her "ma'am" -- I wonder if she calls them "Sir" in return?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:03 AM
1

Like i said before, having to believe either a nut or the stormtroopers is one hell of a choice.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:45 AM
3

Here's a possible clue as to why most of the positions of power are still held by men... "Women now outnumber men in the Australian media, but they are typically younger..." Fancy that, people straight out of Uni not being given the same positions of power as those who have been in the industry for thirty years. The misogyny is unbearable! Sob, sob...
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:38 AM
0

Third. Rate. Troll.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:33 AM
1

I suspect a certain woman is now on very thin ice with the gynocrats at CNN.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:17 AM
1

Wow, such a rational and well articulated comment! You must be really proud of yourself.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:14 AM
3

Set up a petition?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:09 AM
4

No. If she were a straight boy she would be in jail already and the liberal media would not give a shit.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:59 AM
1

Trooooolllll.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 10:42 AM
2

Believing a loony tunes actress or a bunch of New York StormTroopers, how's that for a dilemma?
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:54 AM
-2

How cute, you think i'm still reading your comments!
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:50 AM
3

Yeah, i had just woken up when i saw this and got suckered by the title. Fact is the only thing the guy says that is suspect is that he believes she was abused despite no evidence for that claim. The Manson thing could be because of Manson's sex or because he ordered several killings not just carried out one, or simply because Manson's evil has been so blown out of all proportion by the media that he has become an obvious example to use when referring to evil bastards. I hereby second the call f…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:04 AM
1

"I mean, it's just some dumb video game. Most people are prolly "tee hee el oh el" or "wow pretty gay no homo" or give it an eyeroll and move on or understand the sentiments of cheating lovers when they've been cheated on." The game is about cheating men, not cheating lovers hence any such sentiments would be overwhelmingly about cheating men not about cheating lovers. If the game were about cheating lovers of both sexes then referring to "the sentiments of cheating lovers when they've been chea…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:58 AM
0

You are clearly a simpleton. Also a liar as the game is not about "cheating lovers" but about cheating men. Kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:58 AM
-5

This man is a piece of shit. I hope he hooks up with some chick who sticks an ice pick in his empty skull (and then gets away with it because she's a woman, of course.) EDIT: This man is a bit of a bastard. I hope he hooks up with some chick who throws an unripe tomato at his empty skull (and then gets away with it because she's a woman, of course.) I had just woken up when i saw this and got suckered by the bullshit title. Fact is, the only thing the guy says that is suspect is that he believes…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:42 AM
1

No, just the ones who are.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 05:47 AM
2

Troooooolllll
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:55 AM
4

Don't waste my time trying to portray the exception as the rule. Now fuck off quickly.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:22 AM
30

Not surprising coming from CNN, they often come across as an unofficial arm of the National Organization for Women.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:23 PM
1

Funny.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:13 PM
1

FYI, a "boofhead" is a stupid person.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:50 AM
1

The law is an ass.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 06:49 AM
5

I might not be totally happy but i wouldn't be trying to lock him up,either -- i would be keeping a very close eye on the relationship to make sure he wasn't manipulating her by using the enormous wisdom and experience that comes from being a couple of years older than someone else (/s). Incidentally, nice attempt at passing an 18 year old off as an adult, but that turkey aint gonna fly.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 05:25 AM
0

"but requesting harshness on the basis of "if it were a male..." is a lot stupid." FTFY
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:50 AM
8

She should get away with it, they're both kids for fuck's sake. Complain about the disgusting disparity all you want, but don't try to sacrifice this kid to make a stupid point. The idea should be to get males treated with the same sympathy, not to lock up kids for having it off with kids.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:48 AM
1

"Why are men being oppressed, I don't understand this." Mostly because it serves the plutocracy -- you will notice that it is the lower class men who cop the majority of this misandrist shit, not the Obamas and Murdochs of the world. Feminists, needless to say, are a part of this plutocratic effort to crush men and have been at least since the start of the second wave. Face it, boys, if the plutocrats had any real problem with feminism they could crush it within six months.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:16 AM
33

"If you're having a reasoned, intelligent debate with a woman and all of a sudden she throws her hands up and says "OK! Stop talking to me like I'm an idiot," you're likely a mansplainer." In my experience, it is far more likely that the woman you are dealing with is, in fact, an idiot.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:06 AM
5

Shame on you -- you mansplaining bastard, you!
/r/MensRights24/05/13 02:08 AM
2

No, he wouldn't but he should. This entire situation is ludicrous.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:55 AM
1

FYI Once i tag some one as a troll i no longer read their comments. I'm in one of my rare good moods so i thought i would save you any wasted effort in the future.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 10:35 AM
1

Stop wasting my time with this shit. No wonder i've got you tagged as a possible troll. On the other hand, make that a definite troll.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:21 AM
1

Sure, the odds of hooking up with Nannie Doss or Lorena Bobbit are small, but by the time you find out what's what it's too late. Same with women who'll get pregnant and force you to spend the next 18 years paying for a kid you never wanted. And then there's the power over men that our society grants women, the kind of power that can turn even a good woman into an asshole.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:23 AM
1

Yeah, try using it to build a bridge...
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:30 AM
1

"actually get to know a woman before you sleep with her." You mean the way that Nannie Doss' husbands ( and sisters, and children, and grandchildren) knew her? The kind of knowledge that has you thinking she's okay till you come home one day to find half the kids dead?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 12:41 AM
1

Casper the over-friendly ghost.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:45 AM
3

Here's the petition, in case nobody has posted it already. http://www.change.org/petitions/assistant-state-attorney-brian-workman-stop-the-prosecution-of-an-18-year-old-girl-in-a-same-sex-relationship
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:43 AM
1

Meh, Romeo and Juliet clause should be put in place for such cases. You're right in implying there wouldn't be much sympathy if she were a guy, though.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 02:27 AM
2

Claptrap. If the men in your gym do anything more than occasionally glance at the good looking girls they are lazy bastards who can't keep their mind on the job. As for gay gyms, you are flattering yourself -- i worked out at one for a year and unless you're a hunk they aren't going to stare, and even then once they know you're straight they ignore you. I can only assume from your comment that in SF both gay and straight men are little more than chimps with nothing other than sex on the brain.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:19 AM
1

My gym's members range from 5' to 6'3" and i never see anyone complaining. Seats are adjustable, pads are adjustable -- hell, everything is adjustable. Even the stacks and dumbbells range from 5 pounds to a couple of hundred pounds. If anyone is getting screwed it's the few behemoths who need a stack weighing several hundred pounds.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:15 AM
-3

Female privilege, all other justifications are merely galsplaining. Most men in my gym don't even seem to notice the girls, and this is a university gym so most of the females are young and in fairly good shape. The idea that men will stop working out to drool at the sight of some fat, middle aged woman squeezed into a leotard two sizes too small is ludicrous beyond description. The other excuse is that the equipment is built for males and this too is BS -- I see plenty of 5' women using the sam…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:35 AM
2

"The provisions of this article shall not be construed to impair any rights, benefits, or exemptions now or hereafter conferred by law upon persons of the female sex." That's even worse than grandfathering! It seems to clearly state that it would apply not only to what is already in place but to anything that might come into play in the future. Feminists, ya gotta love 'em.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:25 AM
1

He serves the plutocracy eg bailing out banks but not Main Street. He has killed dozens of innocents with drone strikes in places like Pakistan. Anyone who does these things is filth.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:53 AM
1

Do the words "drone strikes" ring a bell? Some “intelligence” agency tells him that some guy in Pakistan may or may not, some time in the next few years, become a terrorist, so the butcher in the White House gives the okay for the guy to be murdered -- without trial, mind you -- and anyone who happens to be standing around also gets blown to kingdom come. Doing this even once makes him a mass murderer, and he’s done it many, many times since he took office.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 01:52 AM
-1

What's severe about it? It's all based on fact, if anything is severe it's reality.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:26 AM
15

Not so fast. A couple of years ago the feminists were talking about grandfathering certain programs so that current sex-specific crap like the White House Council on Women would remain, but any future male equivalent would be forbidden. Have they dropped that idea? I don't know, but i don't like the look of this bit... "Thus, single-sex institutions whose aim is to perpetuate the historic dominance of one sex over the other are already unconstitutional, while single-sex institutions that work to…
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:46 AM
0

Oh noes, an outsider is pissed off at me! Whatever shall i do?!?!
/r/MensRights20/05/13 09:29 AM
17

The plantation is still alive and well, though well disguised by the whiteness of many of its captives.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:24 AM
-5

Fuck Obama, i don't need a spineless, feminist, plutocratic, mass-murdering piece of filth telling me or anyone else how to be a man. “My whole life, I’ve tried to be for Michelle and my girls what my father wasn’t for my mother and me,” Ah yes, the turd in the White House has daddy issues and it's the rest of the men who suffer for it.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:20 AM
3

Sally Field, aka The Lying Nun
/r/MensRights20/05/13 01:03 AM
14

"The level of stupidity and willful ignorance is incredible." You should change your username to ConfirmedRealist.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:50 PM
2

"...will be "pageant style" and involve "talent, evening wear, and swimsuit elements." Oh crap, now i'm stuck with an image of David Futrelle wearing a swimsuit!
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:17 AM
1

Meh, given his past support for this PC crap it sounds like a white knight getting screwed by his own side.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:01 AM
6

"Why are men so angry when women have it so much worse?" I would like to thank the writer for letting me know at the outset that her article is not worth reading.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 02:54 AM
1

And when the man rebels against his servitude by having an affair, he is treated like the villain of the piece.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 02:52 AM
1

Darn, i was just about to post this. Being Alternet i won't bother reading it, but the first paragraph alone tells you it's typical Gynonet BS. Really, Woods et al weren't pathologized or shamed for their behavior? Lies, damned lies and feminism.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 02:49 AM
6

Mmm, there's something distinctly fishy about this entire theory... On the other hand, if it's true we probably had ancestors that would have been quite delightful after being crumbed and fried!
/r/MensRights17/05/13 10:52 AM
3

How we leave is a question i am not smart enough to answer.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:59 AM
4

Really, what more is there? As for emotional attachment, that could be said of men whose kids are aborted. Either way, the emotional attachment does not make the fetus part of her anymore than Mr X's attachment to his Golden Retriever makes the dog a physical part of him.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:18 AM
3

Yeah, by a thin tube and no more. It is not part of her, period.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:54 AM
18

Disingenuous rubbish, you know very well that there is a difference between something that is inside her body and something that is part of her body. Then, of course, there is the fact that your appendix is never going to turn into a human being if left to its own devices.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:29 AM
26

"What I'd hate to see is the idea that a fetus is a person when the mother wants it to be but not when she doesn't want it to be." We are already there. Someone else kills it, they face criminal charges, the mother kills it, no worries.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:43 PM
-2

Sexist cow.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:04 AM
1

At least one of them was just a link to studies showing that women commit a lot more DV than Alternet would like to think. Another of my comments was a link to George Carlin's rant about how evil men are. That one was removed and not even a notice left to indicate its fate.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 03:27 AM
2

Well, that's part of the strategy. Now, the uninitiated can look at the response to my comments and assume that i must have said something truly atrocious.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 03:02 AM
2

So it is. Fuck Alternet, they are worse than the feminist subbreddits. As seen in the above post, my comments were far from objectionable. Alternet is hereby struck off my bookmark sidebar.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:26 AM
2

Here she is defending her racist tweet by claiming that even though she wrote in the present tense she was actually talking about the bad old days... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B25Wfvw1uzM Black, female, Labor -- what are the chances she got the job on qualifications rather than affirmative action?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:04 AM
2

Preserved for posterity in case they get deleted like those by the guy linking to DV studies, my comments... "Charles was photographed holding a hand-lettered sign that said, “I stand with Jane Doe because when I became a victim of a sex crime, no one asked me if I was drunk or what I was wearing or what I had done to make it happen.” Probably because everyone was too busy laughing at him to ask questions." "Being a man: Adult Male Homo Sapiens All other definitions -- feminist, patriarchal, plu…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:26 PM
1

Wow, who would have expected that in the SMH? As for Sam De Brito, didn't he used to be a massive boofhead who was always on about the wiminz? Or have i got the wrong guy here? I swear, i had to check the byline to see that it really was him rather than a garbo he'd gotten in as a guest writer! Either way, there is truth in every line of that article.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:15 AM
10

In case it doesn't make it past moderation, here's my comment... "Richards was in the wrong and deserved to be fired for doing what was essentially the opposite of her job, ie cause discord instead of creating harmony. Why don't you SPLC types find something useful to do with your time? Try going after Neo Nazis or something. You know, the kind of people who actually are a problem but of whom you are probably scared senseless."
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:18 AM
1

Funny her going on about minorities, she seems to have a similar mentality to cab drivers who won't pick up blacks because, you know, a black man standing on the sidewalk has got to be up to something.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:09 AM
1

"What is going on in the US when someone this horrid gets a viewership and airtime?" The entire Amerikan system is set up to reward bad behavior as long as it makes money. The real question is why there aren't more like her on TV -- perhaps the average American has more decency than the scum who run the tv stations.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 03:01 AM
5

Women are innately more violent than men, that's why despite a lifetime of being socialized to be nice they are at least as violent towards children and female partners as men. That's the sex we need to emulate, is it? What, things aren't bad enough?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:49 AM
1

Yes, but it's not usually from above, which would make for a grim look, and it's not harsh, one-point lighting which is notorious for making people look like shit.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 02:35 AM
2

Really? I don't see any such trickery, it all looks like very ordinary lighting to me.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:29 AM
7

Here's something i wrote a while back. It's an anti war bit that also shows the real face of "male privilege," ie a gallery of men disfigured while enjoying the almost exclusively male privilege of being killed, maimed or disfigured while defending their country. WARNING, THIS IS NOT FOR THE FAINT HEARTED. http://thepigmancometh.com/2012/04/25/the-wages-of-war%E2%80%A6/
/r/MensRights09/05/13 05:28 AM
1

Atheism, anarchism, and now the Onion -- feminists invade every field they can and subvert it to serve their own agenda. I guess I'll have to do with the Onion what i do with atheist and anarchist sites -- ignore them.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:45 AM
1

Horrible but true... http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/sep/05/save-the-children-uk-campaign
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:19 AM
0

I take it you are living in Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:16 AM
0

First, throwing sandwiches at someone should not be a crime as it does no harm at all. Second, the idea that not having sandwiches thrown at one is a human right is hilarious.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter