TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Title_IX_For_All Archive

View 260 posts and 399 comments by Title_IX_For_All on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2136

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights31/12/18 09:38 PM
1547

DiscriminationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:35 PM
1302

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights08/03/22 05:50 PM
1154

Social IssuesTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights29/09/23 03:28 PM
640

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:45 PM
580

FeminismTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights09/11/23 05:45 PM
546

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights27/02/24 10:00 PM
497

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/09/24 04:42 PM
461

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/12/18 09:26 PM
414

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/10/22 12:11 AM
381

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights30/12/21 04:57 PM
368

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights11/06/21 04:47 PM
345

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/03/19 03:27 PM
343

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights20/06/24 12:53 AM
339

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/12/18 03:30 AM
279

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights13/05/19 03:41 PM
273

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights14/10/24 06:32 PM
252

Social IssuesTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights13/11/18 07:41 PM
246

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights28/09/23 06:25 PM
241

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/11/23 10:14 PM
241

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights26/04/24 02:49 PM
237

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/01/22 07:48 PM
226

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/09/24 04:41 PM
226

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights30/10/18 06:01 PM
224

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 06:31 PM
220

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 07:49 PM
212

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 05:44 PM
207

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/01/26 07:20 PM
204

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:54 PM
192

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/22 08:01 PM
188

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights20/02/24 06:32 PM
186

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 10:48 PM
185

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights29/12/21 09:03 PM
181

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/22 12:12 AM
175

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights31/08/21 10:41 PM
175

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/07/24 04:53 PM
170

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights20/04/23 07:25 PM
166

misandryTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/21 02:11 PM
159

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights10/04/19 06:38 PM
159

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/03/25 08:55 PM
158

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:56 PM
154

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights04/01/24 03:16 PM
153

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:03 PM
150

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 04:54 PM
148

sexualityTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/21 11:19 PM
147

Social IssuesTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:48 PM
146

FeminismTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights13/07/23 09:37 PM
146

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/24 06:32 PM
145

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights28/06/24 06:04 PM
144

articleTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 05:20 PM
141

FeminismTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:42 PM
141

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 06:29 PM
140

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/24 06:48 PM
138

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/03/25 08:57 PM
136

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/05/19 05:47 PM
134

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/23 07:27 PM
132

DiscriminationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights13/12/21 11:18 PM
125

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights05/11/23 08:41 PM
123

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:04 PM
123

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 12:35 PM
121

articleTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/24 08:34 PM
117

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/24 02:47 PM
114

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 03:43 PM
113

articleTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/22 11:09 PM
112

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights13/05/21 02:22 PM
111

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/23 05:04 PM
109

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/23 10:11 PM
108

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights28/09/23 01:58 PM
108

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights29/07/24 08:22 PM
104

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/23 08:40 PM
103

sexualityTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 08:24 PM
102

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights23/10/23 08:35 PM
102

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:51 PM
101

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/24 07:16 PM
101

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights16/06/21 04:00 PM
98

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/22 10:26 PM
97

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights13/09/23 01:44 AM
97

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights27/02/24 03:39 PM
95

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/04/24 06:09 PM
93

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:33 PM
91

Anti-MRMTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights21/05/19 10:19 PM
91

social issuesTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 09:43 PM
89

GeneralTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights19/03/20 03:47 AM
85

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 06:29 PM
81

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/24 02:05 PM
81

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights26/04/19 06:24 PM
80

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/24 04:22 PM
75

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/24 08:38 PM
75

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:43 PM
74

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 04:56 PM
73

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 01:47 PM
72

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:13 PM
72

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/22 07:20 PM
72

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights31/08/21 02:10 PM
71

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/23 09:35 PM
71

Social IssuesTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:45 PM
71

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:49 PM
71

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights01/04/20 05:00 PM
70

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 04:51 PM
70

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights28/04/19 08:40 PM
69

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 10:47 PM
68

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/01/24 04:30 PM
66

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/23 03:41 PM
65

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights27/06/19 06:18 PM
65

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights06/10/23 07:24 PM
64

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/23 07:11 PM
64

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/23 05:37 PM
64

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/23 07:10 PM
63

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights19/07/24 07:14 PM
63

Activism/SupportTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights14/12/18 08:04 PM
63

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:06 PM
63

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/24 07:48 PM
62

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/07/24 07:10 PM
62

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights01/11/23 05:09 PM
61

Activism/SupportTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights19/07/21 04:24 PM
60

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights27/02/24 05:25 PM
60

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights26/10/23 07:11 PM
57

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:13 AM
56

ProgressTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights16/11/18 06:36 PM
56

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights21/04/19 11:44 PM
56

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:20 PM
56

Legal RightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights27/11/18 11:41 PM
55

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights05/04/24 06:38 PM
55

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/24 06:33 PM
52

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/04/20 10:19 PM
52

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/23 06:36 PM
51

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/25 05:28 PM
51

discussionTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 10:29 PM
51

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 07:18 PM
51

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/23 04:51 AM
50

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights22/01/25 05:12 PM
49

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/02/22 11:12 PM
49

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights04/11/24 07:17 PM
49

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:09 PM
48

mental healthTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/22 01:17 AM
48

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights20/02/23 07:19 PM
48

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 02:55 PM
48

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights09/01/24 05:03 PM
47

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 06:14 PM
47

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/23 12:18 AM
46

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:21 PM
45

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/22 07:06 PM
45

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/24 08:09 PM
44

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/04/19 04:31 PM
43

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 11:22 PM
43

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/24 06:21 PM
42

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights26/05/23 09:38 PM
42

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:17 AM
41

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights23/07/21 12:08 AM
41

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights05/03/19 12:58 AM
41

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:00 PM
41

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights27/06/24 08:37 PM
40

GeneralTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/10/24 08:30 PM
40

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 06:47 PM
40

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/01/19 04:05 PM
39

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights18/08/23 04:47 PM
39

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights16/04/19 05:34 PM
38

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 12:34 AM
38

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights26/09/19 06:20 PM
37

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/24 05:02 PM
36

articleTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/21 04:24 PM
36

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/23 05:09 PM
35

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights06/05/19 04:29 PM
35

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 05:10 PM
34

HealthTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights19/11/22 01:19 AM
34

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:14 AM
34

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/01/24 08:09 PM
33

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/24 07:10 PM
32

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 02:31 PM
32

Legal RightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights22/04/19 11:55 PM
32

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights04/11/22 07:05 PM
31

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 04:34 PM
31

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/23 12:59 PM
30

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 10:42 PM
29

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 08:16 PM
29

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights04/12/18 09:55 PM
29

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/04/19 08:05 PM
29

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/08/23 10:28 PM
29

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights30/04/24 07:36 PM
28

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights14/05/21 04:02 PM
28

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 08:30 PM
28

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights15/06/21 06:36 PM
27

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights23/07/21 12:11 AM
27

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/24 04:42 PM
27

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/23 09:34 PM
27

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/23 08:33 PM
27

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 07:36 PM
27

Activism/SupportTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights31/07/24 08:55 PM
26

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/03/23 11:21 PM
26

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/02/24 04:43 PM
26

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights15/11/18 12:15 AM
26

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights22/03/19 06:45 PM
25

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights11/05/21 06:04 PM
25

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/21 03:25 AM
25

legal rightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/22 07:31 PM
25

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights07/06/23 06:36 PM
24

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights01/11/22 07:22 PM
24

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:00 AM
24

Legal RightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:21 PM
23

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights01/04/19 05:50 PM
23

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights21/11/18 10:37 PM
23

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 02:09 PM
22

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 03:46 PM
22

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights13/01/22 04:29 PM
21

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:19 PM
21

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/23 03:56 PM
21

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights05/04/19 04:59 PM
20

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights24/10/23 04:52 AM
20

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:13 PM
19

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:53 PM
19

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights22/02/19 07:50 PM
19

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights09/08/21 06:46 PM
19

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:46 PM
19

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights09/05/19 07:14 PM
18

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights05/12/23 08:36 PM
18

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:48 PM
18

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights05/03/24 06:33 PM
17

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights21/01/19 07:35 PM
17

GeneralTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:41 PM
17

discussionTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/23 04:47 PM
17

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:22 PM
16

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights21/10/21 02:31 PM
16

DiscriminationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights30/04/19 06:42 PM
16

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights15/06/21 02:07 PM
16

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights02/08/23 07:49 PM
16

Legal RightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/12/18 04:07 AM
15

Activism/SupportTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/03/19 02:46 PM
15

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:01 AM
14

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:29 PM
14

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/01/19 08:02 PM
14

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights10/05/19 06:08 PM
14

Legal RightsTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:25 PM
13

Social IssuesTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights19/10/18 10:38 PM
12

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights22/12/23 09:33 PM
12

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights04/04/23 12:58 PM
11

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights14/02/20 06:28 PM
11

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights18/10/18 10:31 PM
11

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights08/04/19 07:56 PM
11

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:52 PM
10

GeneralTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:35 PM
9

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:58 PM
9

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 06:08 PM
6

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights18/12/21 03:26 AM
6

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights13/03/19 07:07 PM
5

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights28/02/19 07:35 PM
3

Edu./Occu.Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:09 AM
3

Activism/SupportTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights11/10/18 04:29 PM
1

third worldTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/21 02:35 AM
1

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights11/04/19 03:40 PM
1

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:28 PM
1

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights22/03/19 06:44 PM
1

DiscriminationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights17/08/21 02:34 AM
1

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/12/18 09:25 PM
1

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/03/19 02:45 PM
1

False AccusationTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights25/10/22 12:09 AM
1

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:49 PM
1

Title_IX_For_All/r/MensRights03/01/19 02:35 PM
1

Social IssuesTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:04 PM
1

educationTitle_IX_For_All/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 09:48 PM
1

Social IssuesTitle_IX_For_All/r/MensRights01/07/21 08:24 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
73

Funny how the first thing these feminists jump to is "sex discrimination in employment is good, actually."
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 09:47 PM
1

Of course they never said it. I was showing them what they sound like by using an issue and a class of victims that they actually empathize with. Being canceled is real, you just have to look below the most privileged men who can survive a cancellation attempt And you have to have empathy for the wrongly accused, and be capable of empathy for men in general.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 04:29 PM
36

Focusing on a tiny portion (0.0001% of men) who are already financially privileged and well-connected and saying they survived the accusation, therefore the accusation cannot harm anyone, is fundamentally flawed. In studies and surveys, that is called selection bias. People who lack those connections do lose their jobs, educational opportunities, friend groups, romantic relationships, and so forth over unproven and wrongful allegations all the time. They are not the top 1% of men, though; they a…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 02:48 AM
38

Not sure why people make arguments like that. Imagine people pointing to a rape victim who is a successful celebrity, a corporate leader, or a public figure who has their life together and saying "See? Rape doesn't cause lasting psychological harm - this person is still successful and has their life together."
/r/MensRights22/04/26 02:08 AM
4

In the Title IX/school sexual misconduct investigation area things vastly better than 10 years ago. Things are never perfect, and problems persist, but they are definitely better.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/25 05:53 PM
26

Nothing less than giving up the entire binary of oppressor/oppressed into which all groups are funneled (or at least discarding it when it comes to men and women) along with a variety of other dogmas that effectively form the quasi-religious belief system of progressive identity politics. For example, filtering all groups into the strict binary of oppressor/oppressed just doesn't work in cases where (1) both compared groups have historically faced discrimination, or (2) where the "privileged" gr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/25 06:21 PM
14

The takeaways are that: False rape claims are not rare and are instead substantially higher than false reporting of other crimes Most rape claims cannot be proven one way or the other, and any amount of those claims may be true or false.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/25 10:16 PM
6

Feminism is a left-wing movement. It is a modernization of socialist/Marxist ideas, but bastardized and applied to sex/gender. Another indicator that feminism is left-wing is that...virtually all mainstream feminist organizations, to the extent that they mention politics and politicians at all, support leftist politics and leftist politicians generally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 04:41 AM
2

You're welcome!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/25 10:40 PM
37

I will offer National Women's Law Center, which filed briefs in court demanding immunity for prosecution for false rape accusers - even when those accusations are both proven to be false and the product of deliberate malice. Also, NWLC filed a brief in court demanding that accusers have the right for institutions to preserve a guilty finding entered against accused men, even after the finding of guilt was found in court to be the product of an unconstitutional proceeding.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/25 10:18 PM
20

This is the monthly recap that I send out, and the mods asked me to post it here when it made sense. I haven't posted one of these here in a while, and I figure some people might like a look into the more technical side of accused student/accused faculty litigation, policy, etc. One of the key takeaways here are that certain regions are becoming hostile to pseudonymity (.e.g., proceeding as "John Doe") for accused students who sue their schools. This defeats the purpose of accused student litiga…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/25 05:32 PM
22

Yes. It's always funny to ask a feminist if she thinks "They're murderers, they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people" was racist when Trump said it about immigrants (who are not a race), and then to ask them if they think "They're murderers, they're rapists, and some, I assume, are good people" is acceptable to say about men.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/25 04:42 PM
1

Hmm, I don't feel that way. You do have to "vet" the person. Give it a few good dates, ask about their beliefs, get to know them better, etc. It's not a perfect strategy, but it's far from impossible. So perhaps a better title would be "how to reduce the risk of false accusations."
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:32 PM
13

I wrote a guide about it - https://titleixforall.com/guide-how-to-avoid-false-accusations-of-rape-and-sexual-assault/ The main suggestions: Avoid Encounters With Women You Don’t Know Well Avoid Encounters With Women Who Are Intoxicated or High Avoid Encounters With Women Who Already Have Partners Avoid Encounters With Mentally Unstable or Otherwise Toxic Women Avoid Ambiguous Encounters Avoid Women With Extreme “Progressive” or “Traditional” Views on Sex and Relationships Treat Your Sexual Partn…
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:37 PM
8

Advocacy is a discipline, and like any other discipline it can be done well or poorly. Salesmanship and seeking leverage will go much further than "bang on the table" activism that doesn't work for most activists, men's activists especially.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:14 PM
22

You should feel welcome here as a woman. There's no reason for you to feel any guilt on behalf of your sex or anything like that, if that's what you're wondering.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/25 05:58 AM
4

It's a good case with great opportunities, and it's already created positive precedents for accused students in the Second Circuit and Connecticut Supreme Court. I wrote about it twice (example). But after those victories, the case took a detour from a battle over the merits to a battle over pseudonymity for Jane Doe, Khan's accuser. The prosecution sought to "unmask" Jane Doe before a decision on the merits, and I do not believe the judge took it very well. The battle over the defamation claims…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:33 AM
2

Come up for air, spend less time online, or less time online in the same places.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/25 03:44 AM
15

"It's not a conspiracy, it's a culture" is a phrase that works well here. And even when misandry doesn't really "land" with people, the term "gender bias" still might.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/25 04:32 PM
3

I had great success dating foreign (Mexico). Got married and she has helped me with advocacy! Advocacy and politics can be a real emotional drain...gotta come up for air regularly and do other things. Sometimes, just being online less helps. I like to go out to the park or the lake and just be in nature...literally and figuratively a breath of fresh air.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 07:26 PM
7

That's a good question. I am tempted to say yes, but I am not familiar enough with administrative agency law to say I know for sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 06:40 PM
39

No idea what happens with the student now. The appeal window for the school's internal grievance procedure may be closed. If that is the case, the university would be wise to set aside the discipline imposed on the student, as this finding by ED may open up a litigation opportunity. Most school misconduct cases do not involve police, especially harassment claims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 06:28 PM
26

Here is the Resolution Agreement entered into between the College and ED. And here is the letter. I'm going through a backlog of these cases that ED released just recently.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 05:44 PM
5

If you find it please send it to me. I do a lot of work in the education space.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 10:37 PM
8

The opposite of feminism is not misogyny; the opposite of feminism is compassion for men and boys as a group.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/25 03:48 AM
8

There is a justification for it, but - just like health insurance - it is probably not best for it to come from the private sector/employers and have it be bound to employment. The issue here, from an egalitarian perspective, is that companies have no problem recruiting women with benefits and programs aimed at women, but regard it as discrimination to do the same for men.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 01:04 AM
22

Even further, look at benefits. Women consume a disproportionate amount of benefits, and some benefits are set up with the explicit goal of recruiting more women to the company knowing that women will be the majority consumers of those benefits. Take maternity leave, which is ~80% taken by women and enacted to recruit women. The money for those benefits is not "free"; it is drawn from the entire pot of money allocated for benefits and compensation for employees in general. Instead of raising wag…
/r/MensRights25/01/25 12:39 AM
72

I recommend dropping the term "incel" in disciplined advocacy because it is fundamentally unproductive and doesn't seem to really address the issue. Celibacy has a very specific meaning in that it refers to sex, so if your primary goal is to address broader but nonetheless related issues like lack of meaningful relationships (male loneliness), limiting the go-to descriptor for the issue to "men aren't getting enough (or any) sex and it's not their fault" is extremely unproductive. Worse than fai…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 02:50 AM
1

Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 10:34 PM
15

It was a separate incident. The harassment of the lacrosse players was an ongoing campaign of sorts that lasted months.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 01:31 AM
3

Looks like a good candidate for falseaccusersregistry.com!
/r/MensRights18/01/25 10:25 PM
30

Oof. At least you found an honest attorney.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:47 PM
57

None of them were fired. The accused students sued the school and won a nice settlement, but no one was personally held responsible or suffered anything career-wise.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:45 PM
99

Three white male lacrosse players - all students of Duke University (a prestigious university) - were falsely accused of raping a black female stripper at an off-campus party. Protests immediately erupted. Some protesters carrying banners reading "castrate." Some surrounded the accused students on campus and shouted "confess! Confess!" Wanted posters of the accused students were placed on campus with photos of the Duke lacrosse team. Eighty-eight members of the Duke faculty - all from the humani…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:41 PM
103

A bit old, but here's my story: In ~2010 in the U.S., I was a grad student and was also teaching freshman English classes at A&M in a department that was 70% female (same as national average). In my undergrad years everything was pretty awesome. But for my grad work, we all got funneled into a few required classes, and the a few of the profs started taking off their ideological "masks." When I got into one of those classes, it was nothing like the course description (Advanced Rhetoric) and was i…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 07:46 PM
24

It is not the law of the land because it has not been published to the National Archives, and it has not been published because it has failed the ratification process due to it expiring. Statement by the National Archives one month ago - https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2025/nr25-004 There is the chance it could be a good or bad thing. It all depends on who is in power and how they choose to interpret and enforce things.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 08:25 PM
4

Here in Texas: Men's rights as an advocacy movement? Barely, it seems. Men's issues? Not mainstream or common, but not entirely unheard of.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 08:19 PM
9

A little respect and empathy can go a long way. Heck, simply dropping the grudge match and abandoning the "it's not sexism/discrimination when we do it against men" can go a long way...but some people just won't do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/25 08:03 PM
1

Correct. Edit: well, not entirely. The Final Rule was also struck down as unconstitutional because it adopted an overbroad and vague definition of harassment that would have unfairly deprived many young men of an education if it had gone into effect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/25 06:18 PM
74

I sympathize. Several issues here. Because powerful men's activism would be fundamentally disruptive, Reddit - which has a clear bias in its admin team against men and men's issues and is notoriously censorious - is not an ideal place to invest a lot of time. I have been involved in men's issues advocacy since 2010, and 95%+ of the advocacy occurs outside of Reddit. I sympathize with the barriers that pro-male mods are up against. More broadly speaking, there is an issue with men's issues advoca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/25 03:01 PM
19

This is why it's hard for users who are simply neutral toward men to stay on Reddit long-term. You almost have to accept anti-male content to stay here, unless you are here almost (or deliberately) to spite it. It is also unfortunate that Google's search algorithm prioritizes Reddit as much as it does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/24 04:19 AM
15

Since I specialize in a particular area, I just say my area of specialization (advisor for accused students and faculty). People automatically get that most of the accused are men/boys. But I'll also say I do some men's advocacy if the conversation develops further. My family, partner, and best friend know I'm involved. My wife helps me. She has been a great help and is my biggest supporter. I don't really tell people about my political or ideological views unless the occasion warrants it, but I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/24 10:08 PM
9

Good points, especially with attorney-client privilege. From what I've seen, by the time the student receives notice he often still has a shot, but it's a toss-up. If he's innocent, he still has to "play a near-perfect game." There are often levers accused students can pull depending on the case, but they won't usually know how to do that by themselves.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 08:10 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:49 PM
2

Real men's issues, non-partisan.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 05:58 AM
3

We don't really hope to monetize the channel. As for getting banned, we're concerned as well but we're willing to risk it. We'll also be cross-posting our videos on other platforms.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 11:06 PM
2

"It doesn’t seem like a law was passed to change things, more administration by administration guidelines." The executive branch doesn't pass laws, so they issue guidance and regulation. Unlike regulations, guidance is not enforceable (although it can reference enforceable laws or regulation). Title IX regulations were issued by the Trump administration in 2020 and then by the Biden administration this year. The Trump admin didn't just rescind the sub-regulatory Obama-era guidance; it went furth…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 05:20 AM
3

Around 50%.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/24 02:30 PM
11

About ~40% are defeated in court. In ~50% of cases the parties accept a confidential settlement. A settlement usually occurs when an accused student prevails in a key decision leading up to trial (motions to dismiss, university motions for summary judgment), but it can occur for other reasons. In the rest of the cases, the student voluntarily withdraws the suit for a variety of reasons, while ~1% go to trial. Many students who settle are not looking to punish schools for their misdeeds (no matte…
/r/MensRights15/10/24 02:52 AM
2

There's hope, just not through these kinds of lawsuits alone.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:27 AM
9

Since ~2011.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 12:21 AM
34

Schools have limitless resources to fight accused students. Most of these cases are David and Goliath scenarios. When accused students prevail in key decisions leading up to trial (motions to dismiss, university motions for summary judgment), the parties usually accept a confidential settlement. Many students are not looking to punish schools for their misdeeds (no matter how much the schools deserve it) or broaden the legal path for other accused students to follow , but simply to clear their n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 11:40 PM
72

Of the nearly 900 lawsuits filed against higher ed schools for violating the rights of students accused of sexual misconduct, only nine have made it to trial. Of those, four have been successful. This is one of them.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 06:37 PM
77

Of the nearly 900 lawsuits filed against higher ed schools for violating the rights of students accused of sexual misconduct, only nine have made it to trial. Of those, four have been successful. This is one of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 06:35 PM
13

Thanks. Where are you seeing it has been dismissed? The latest docket entry in PACER is the defendant's reply to the plaintiff's reply to the motion to dismiss on August 9. The parties are awaiting the judge's decision on the motion to dismiss.
/r/MensRights12/09/24 06:16 PM
47

Honestly, there is a problem with the over-emphasis on social media posting in lieu of acting. That said, feminists do commonly demand preferential treatment in response to "one-sided" institutions that aren't anywhere near as one-sided as they claim, and deconstructing their misinformation (e.g., wage gap myths) is a necessary step to dismantling whatever preferential treatment they have put in place or demand.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 03:11 AM
2

Sure thing. Let's hear it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/24 01:09 PM
17

Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 09:01 PM
17

This guide will contain some of the advice we are familiar with, but it will also cover some ground not commonly brought forward in men's issues forums. You may agree with some or most of the things in this guide but take exceptions to others, and that's ok! At the end of the day, I hope the guide comes across as having the first priority of protecting the wrongly accused and reducing their chances of being victims.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 08:30 PM
46

This guide will contain some of the advice we are familiar with, but it will also cover some ground not commonly brought forward in men's issues forums. You may agree with some or most of the things in this guide but take exceptions to others, and that's ok! At the end of the day, I hope the guide comes across as having the first priority of protecting the wrongly accused and reducing their chances of being victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 08:29 PM
16

There's little cross-pollination between these groups. MRAs and PUAs might as well be on separate planets. MGTOWs and PUAs as well. They are more separate than they are similar.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/24 09:10 PM
1

Title IX is a federal law (meaning it applies to all 50 states) that bans sex discrimination in schools that receive financial assistance from the federal government. I wrote a guide about it here if you want to read more of an overview - https://titleixforall.com/what-is-title-ix-a-quick-beginners-guide/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 04:46 PM
8

I think this is the most comprehensive guide you will find anywhere for what to do right at the outset, once you know you have been accused. Let me know what you think!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/24 07:17 PM
5

I think this is the most comprehensive guide you will find anywhere for what to do right at the outset, once you know you have been accused. Let me know what you think!
/r/MensRights19/07/24 07:15 PM
2

Wow, it is vile that they let the comment stand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 05:08 AM
1

Thank you. Yeah, we could have easily talked about it for 2 hours, but we only had ~17 minutes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 04:36 AM
41

"Men's issues" is a much more approachable term, and there are serious issues of concern that are not rights per se. Men's issues encompasses the full scope, IMO. Also, I prefer "advocate" over "activist." When people think of activists, they think of people yelling at others in public, blocking traffic, or generally being rude in the promotion of an issue. The word "advocate" tends to imply a sense of discipline or professionalism. AMI is an interesting acronym.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 02:11 PM
3

Pretty much, yes. They were mostly undone by the Biden administration's Title IX regulations. But the effective date of those Biden regulations is August 1, and those regulations are now blocked in 15 states.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/24 05:39 PM
10

Correct. This was established by the Trump-era Title IX regulations and by the courts in decisions going back to 1994. The Trump-era regulations: schools must "Include a presumption that the respondent is not responsible for the alleged conduct until a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the grievance process"; 34 CFR 106.45(b)(1)(iv)(1)(iv)) An example of a court decision from 1994: "Title IX bars the imposition of university discipline where gender is a motivati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/24 04:38 AM
23

Indeed.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 08:28 PM
15

If you are in a state with an injunction in effect after August 1, your school should not be using the new Title IX regs that strip due process from the accused. Any accused student wrongly found responsible ("guilty") for alleged misconduct in a school that improperly used the new regs should have a basis for appeal on the grounds of procedural irregularities. This is something a Title IX advisor/attorney can easily help you with.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:44 PM
23

Correct.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:43 PM
26

If you are in a state with an injunction in effect after August 1, your school should not be using the new regs. And if any school is using the new regs, any accused student who is found responsible ("guilty") for alleged misconduct should have a basis for appeal on the grounds of procedural irregularities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 07:31 PM
3

Thanks for this. Many "consent education" programs have problems. The more honest ones tend to acknowledge that most sexual assaults by men come from a very tiny percentage of men who serially assault. Which then of course raises the question of why many such programs treat most men as needing to be re-educated. I agree, they tend to be more about narrative control in a way that is biased against men.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 09:38 PM
4

For any educational institution that receives federal money, Title IX encompasses all of that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/24 03:41 PM
13

Thank you, you're right! I'll edit my comment.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:09 AM
23

A grand claim to which Sagan's Razor would apply (extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence). If this were true, it would make deep-blue Vermont (which has a self-identifying socialist for a Senator) the most backward state on the nation on women's rights.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 04:40 AM
2

Not sure if this fits your request, but if a strong focus on due process and equal treatment for men accused in higher education does, then feel free to check us out - https://titleixforall.com/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/24 04:04 AM
22

Probably. There are many fake "gym harassment" videos on TikTok, for example.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:17 AM
21

The response to that is this analysis: "Sexual violence prevention programs...show no evidence of reducing their actual occurrence." Link.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:12 AM
12

"Being proactive in learning about rape diminishes the chances of rape happening". Not really. For example, analysis: "Sexual violence prevention programs...show no evidence of reducing their actual occurrence." Link.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:09 AM
23

I will say, since this is a left wing sub, I'm okay with discriminating to correct gross imbalances I understand your point. Consider, though, that the reasoning is not unique or even distinctive to left-wing politics. Mandatory traditional gender roles existed to correct large differences - real or perceived - between men and women. The philosophy of traditional gender roles really was that although men's and women's roles were not equal, they were equitable; men gained a homemaker, women gaine…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 07:21 PM
115

Everyone who discriminates believes, in their own mind, that they are doing it for a good cause. If people think it is ok to discriminate against a specific sex for the good cause of safety, they must also believe it is ok to discriminate against certain races, ages, nationalities, and so forth, for the good cause of safety as well. But they don't. It's not about safety. It's about institutionalizing favor for women and fear of men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/24 03:40 PM
3

Thank you for the shoutout. I was able to get in touch with this person. I am not an attorney, but I do act as an advisor to accused students, which Title IX regulations allow.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 04:49 PM
6

Something I've learned over the years is that it is easier to argue bias than misandry per se. Bias includes misandry but also encompasses a much broader range of behavior. People are also more receptive to the notion of bias than hate...hate is a hard term for people to swallow.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:30 PM
4

There is a slim chance the determination could be reversed. Appeals are uphill battles. They aren't giving him the chance to submit a written appeal? I recently assisted an accused student with an appeal of a nonsensical stalking charge. We are waiting on the school's decision. Ideally, the accused will have an advisor assist from the beginning to help catch and document any procedural irregularities or bias. That will snowball over the course of the case, so that if you need to appeal you alrea…
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:17 PM
1

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/24 02:07 PM
24

Here they are - https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Supreme_Court/Justices.cfm And an image - https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/image/Courts_Probation/Supreme_Court/2021_Colorado_Supreme_Court_Justices.jpg 4 male / 3 female. The lone dissenter is female.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/24 11:50 PM
4

It = University of Denver (DU)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/24 11:39 PM
39

The decision was 6-1 from an all-Democrat panel of judges. It's nice to see a win like this. Cases don't often make it to state supreme courts and have never reached the Supreme Court of the United States despite 8 petitions for certiorari, so circuit courts and state appellate/supreme courts are the highest these cases go, for now. Other recent cases in state supreme courts are Boermeester v. Carry, a devastating loss for the rights of accused students in California that held students were not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/24 08:38 PM
23

Well, she's not wrong. We understand why women said bear: misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/05/24 07:00 PM
15

In advance of any obvious comments that were prominently featured the last time there was an announcement that Dems massively restricted the rights of accused men (which was - checking my watch - not even a week ago), I would like to point out that I wish the name of this sub was Liberal Male Advocates. That seems to be the essence of what people here are going for anyway: liberalism. Not the neo-sexist, illiberal, anti-due process agenda that has clearly metastasized on the left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/24 07:42 PM
25

There are degrees of safety. At minimum, I suggest that male students avoid getting involved with female students who are drinking heavily or who are drinking at parties, who are already in relationships, or who are feminists or mentally disturbed.
/r/MensRights26/04/24 06:31 PM
2

It's possible a case could be brought in federal court that could escalate to the Supreme Court.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/24 09:30 AM
9

I'm referring to circuit and district courts, not SCOTUS. That distinction matters because ~98% of cases never make it to SCOTUS, so in virtually all but the most vanishingly rare cases the circuit and district courts have the final say. SCOTUS has never decided a case by students accused of Title IX violations, despite numerous petitions for SCOTUS to review them. Over 850 lawsuits have been filed by accused students.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 09:56 PM
46

Normally, equitably would mean fairly. But in academia, equity is often a clever euphemism for treating people differently based on their group's perceived "power."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 04:26 PM
28

Thanks. Yeah...a real "shit's on fire" moment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 02:01 PM
3

Perhaps trump can undo this in 2025? Your guess is as good as mine. First he'd have to win, then he'd have to make it a priority. Then it would have to somehow survive all the regulatory hurdles. We are also entering into an era where many federal courts [clarifying edit: circuit and district courts, guys, not SCOTUS] have been stacked with Biden-nominated judges, and due process has been increasingly polarized on partisan lines. Even assuming Trump wins, the courts can interfere. I'm hopeful fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/24 01:33 PM
5

Definitely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 04:30 PM
13

It wouldn't be so bad if the people who use it 99% of the time acknowledge positive masculinity or toxic femininity. But they don't. So if anything, the problem with the term is how it is used: to selectively advance negative sex stereotypes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/24 03:14 PM
5

Exactly. Despite clear actions indicating gender bias, violations of due process, or breach of contract, these colleges go into court making arguments along the lines of "college students accused of serious offenses, and unadvised and alone, need to have the knowledge and skill to make timely on-the-record objections during the school's investigation and hearing, otherwise they waive their claims later in court." It's madness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/24 09:39 PM
12

Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/24 08:21 PM
5

Welcome!
/r/MensRights05/04/24 07:54 PM
16

You're welcome!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/24 07:54 PM
5

I wanted to highlight one way that March has been a unique month for advocacy: we had the opportunity to speak to the federal Office of Management and Budget about the new Title IX regulations and tell them our concerns. Anyone from the public can do this, and the window is still open (learn more here). Some people are saying that the Biden admin will release the new Title IX regulations that roll back due process in May. Some say it will delay releasing them until after the November election be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/24 03:50 PM
31

Universities can't assume accused students are guilty from the beginning. Attorneys and advisors can actively help accused students in meetings, hearings, and so forth, instead of being forced to just sit there like potted plants. School personnel who oversee and take part in investigations and determinations of guilt ("responsibility") cannot have special relationships that would prevent them from being impartial. And a few more things in the linked post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/24 03:05 PM
-8

Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 06:58 PM
-4

Where are you seeing good evidence that there is a serious trend of 40+ year-old men who have lived all of their lives without having a relationship, despite their best reasonable efforts? I'm simply not seeing it. Of course people go through dry spells for months, even years, and some people haven't had a serious relationship by age 24. I wouldn't classify that as being unable to attract a partner, as though they have been shut out entirely. Often, relationships are simply about timing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 06:38 PM
12

Edit: pasting my down-thread comment here because it seems to be the central disconnect: Where are we seeing good evidence that there is a serious trend of 40+ year-old men who have lived all of their lives without having a relationship, despite their best reasonable efforts? I'm simply not seeing it. Of course people go through dry spells for months, even years, and some people haven't had a serious relationship by age 24. I wouldn't classify that as being unable to attract a partner, as though…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/24 05:56 PM
2

Mentioned in more detail here (which is also one of the links in the original post) and here, but these are the main concerns as I see it. Proposed § 106.46(f)(1)(i) – Removal of Live Hearings and Cross-Examination Requirements This proposed change removes the requirement for live hearings, a model in which both parties had greater access to evidence by seeing each party questioned in real time. The proposed change allows schools to default to the easier “single investigator” model in which the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/24 05:27 PM
4

If you don't mind a bit of nerdiness, it's interesting you'd pair due process and anti-fascism like that...last week, a judge allowed an accused male student's lawsuit to go forward and denied University of North Carolina's motion to dismiss on the due process claim specifically. In his opinion, he cited a lawsuit named Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Comm. v. McGrath as precedent for allowing the due process claim to go forward. It's in the order here, on page 26. I thought it was rather interesting…
/r/MensRights09/03/24 05:01 AM
13

The Dems would never consult with male representative bodies as there are nor male issues from a feminist perspective. There is a currently-active opportunity to meet with the Office of Management and budget to give them feedback on the new regulations. Here is more information.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 06:17 PM
9

I tried posting the full text of the linked post here instead of linking to the website, and the post was immediately removed by Reddit's filters. Doesn't look like it's a mod action, so I just reposted it with a link. If I missed something, please let me know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 06:15 PM
4

The graph comes from this analysis on why the due process provisions of the 2020 Title IX regulations were successful. The trend of accused student litigation correlating with due process-friendly regulation is one of four indicators.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 05:31 PM
15

So if its a 2020 provision it would mean the Trump administration was involved in the designing of the regulations? And the biden admin is rolling them back? Is this correct? Correct. Although it's interesting: the initiative seemed to have been more spearheaded by Betsy Devos, then-Secretary of Education, than demanded from above by Trump. Trump did no real public speaking in behalf of due process in a Title IX context, unlike DeVos. Even in Trump's announcement of the final rule's publication,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 03:24 PM
22

The Biden administration is currently engaged in a process to roll back key due process provisions of the 2020 Title IX regulations. Much has been written *before* the 2020 regs went into effect on why due process was necessary, but much less afterward. Here, we can see new data and arguments that indicate the 2020 regulations were indeed necessary (and successful).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/24 02:56 PM
2

We don't have a non-profit arm. We do have a donations page, but not a fund or GoFundMe-style page.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/24 03:43 PM
17

The new Title IX regulations overturning the due process provisions of the 2020 Title IX regulations are almost here, even as lawsuits continue to show the need for due process. Things are starting to pop in the Title IX world, and when the new regs are released you will see a lot of activity in this space.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/24 06:35 PM
2

Yes. It couldn't be a hobby. It would need to be as shielded as it could be from legal liability, cyberattacks, etc. It would have to rely on donations. And it would need staff that could, combined, commit at least 40 hours or more a month for promoting it and creating content. And additional people to chase donors, etc.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 09:12 PM
1

We've occasionally considered creating a false accusers registry of sorts.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 05:09 PM
6

Good point. Baby steps.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 04:32 AM
10

I've paid as much for traffic fines.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 01:59 AM
1

I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights28/02/24 12:43 AM
40

This story was posted last year but has been updated with the sentencing results.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 10:13 PM
54

Surprisingly, it seems to fairly represent the critics and doesn't say "you should think X." And you could even make the argument that it is "too fair" to some critics by not including disingenuous critics or critics who oppose gender equality in any form. They are out there. What do you think?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/24 09:44 PM
52

Surprisingly, it seems to fairly represent the critics and doesn't say "you should think X." And you could even make the argument that it is "too fair" to some critics by not including disingenuous critics or critics who oppose gender equality in any form. They are out there.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:43 PM
9

News and advocacy regarding men accused of misconduct (harassment, sexual assault, etc.) in education, and occasionally general men's education issues: https://twitter.com/TitleIXforAll
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:38 PM
26

I can't speak for everyone, but shared values (the right shared values) and chemistry go a long way. Empathy and patience help a lot too. No one can be in their best/strongest state 100% of the time. We each understand and accommodate that.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 03:02 AM
29

Couldn't be happier.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 02:45 AM
4

Thanks, it's a fair question. I think it is too narrow a term and I think other terms work better, like Men's Issues Advocate. We have some serious rights issues, and I have dedicated over ten years to working on them, but several key issues are also not matters of rights per se, even if they are related to rights. Things like suicide, for example. Also, I prefer the term advocate over activist. Unfortunately, the word "activist" has a negative connotation nowadays. When people hear "activist," …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 07:18 PM
13

I don't ID as a MRA. The label has issues for a variety of reasons, and I think focusing on principles rather than labels is much more productive. I focus on due process and equal treatment in academia. I feel more comfortable with "men's advocate in academia" or something like that, but I also sometimes advocate for women in the rare occasion that they are wrongly accused (doesn't happen often, but it happens).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/24 12:55 AM
37

However, according to the article, "VCU Police is working with the Commonwealth’s Attorney regarding charges related to filing false police reports." We'll see what comes of that...taking it with a grain of salt.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/24 06:33 PM
2

I'd say it has little chance given the current composition of Congress.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 08:33 PM
6

Count on it.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 05:26 PM
9

Glad to see this post is getting some attention. If you want to get news like this via email and don't mind a bit of shameless self promotion, here's the signup (free of course).
/r/MensRights04/01/24 07:52 PM
17

Thank you!
/r/MensRights04/01/24 05:00 PM
2

Right, they won't recognize they are stupid, of course. Nor will others with similar levels of cognitive dissonance. They will simply announce to everyone else that they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 08:44 PM
2

Yes. It's phrased in a way where the reader would have to admit they are stupid if they say yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 08:37 PM
6

The policy was changed *17 times* in a year - quite excessive. And most importantly, without notice to the accused student. Such frequent changes without notice can only benefit the university officials. This is essentially a shell game. The policy change was not used as a claim for sex discrimination by the plaintiff (breach of contract is not sex discrimination, of course). Sex discrimination in education under Title IX was a separate claim entirely. The other half of the oral argument focused…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/23 12:02 AM
1

Exactly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/23 03:30 AM
16

My suggestion when speaking to the general public is to make advocating principles instead of labels the default rhetorical approach. People bring a lot of baggage and symbolic interpretation to ideological labels. For example, others will find it much easier to defend "feminism" than "discrimination," "misandry," "anti-male bias," or, say, "violations of due process." Criticizing feminism's biases is important, but a monomania with defeating feminism will only go so far. Many anti-male people d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/23 03:46 PM
30

Yeah, that was an interesting line. They speak as though Jezebel's stories weren't already inaccurate.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:08 PM
23

Of course, in an ideal world, we would convince people to moderate their views. The problem is that you cannot reason with unreasonable people. Some people are so far gone that you cannot reach them. The best possible outcome is for them to be removed from positions of influence. In that sense, Jezebel is certainly losing. This is a good day for men everywhere.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:01 PM
189

For those of you who have been around a while (~10+ years), this is huge news. Jezebel is famous for articles celebrating domestic violence against men, such as the article Have You Ever Beat Up A Boyfriend? Cause, Uh, We Have. Excerpt: "According to a study of relationships that engage in nonreciprocal violence, a whopping 70% are perpetrated by women. So basically that means that girls are beating up their BFs and husbands and the dudes aren't fighting back. With Amy Winehouse busting open a c…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 05:58 PM
77

It is much rarer than a man being called a loser, but I've seen it happen, and it doesn't have the same social effect that it would have on a man. A man being called a loser is like a woman being called a slut. It is very much a gendered slur, both in origination and in common application. Men are expected to be socioeconomically successful ("winners") and their worth is generally derived from that. Women, historically, have been expected to reserve their sexuality for the reproduction of childr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/23 08:35 PM
1

Here's the bill - https://legiscan.com/DC/text/B25-0436/2023
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:06 AM
20

Hopefully so. It's in South Carolina, which has no Anti-SLAPP law, and there is strong exculpatory physical evidence, so the defamation claim against his accuser in particular has a stronger chance than most defamation claims.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 09:14 PM
21

A provision of a bill doesn't need to be crafted with nefarious intent to create a perverse incentive. Laws should be crafted to deter abuses of them. We should do that here. We should not incentivize non-victims to make reports of abuse to relieve financial or academic pressure by creating such a pathway via law. Good intentions really don't matter when it comes to making laws. On the contrary, much harm has been done by laws crafted with good intentions but with no regard to second-order effec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/23 05:33 AM
19

Link to the bill - https://legiscan.com/DC/text/B25-0436/2023
/r/MensRights03/11/23 10:15 PM
11

The bill's text can be found here - https://legiscan.com/DC/text/B25-0436/2023
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/23 10:11 PM
12

I'd be remiss if I didn't mention our organization, Title IX for All, which fights for the cause of wrongly accused men in higher education - https://titleixforall.com/
/r/MensRights03/11/23 04:07 AM
4

As a precaution: do not base your understanding of progress on men's issues by what you see on social media, including Reddit. Advocates for men have made more progress than people think.
/r/MensRights28/10/23 06:00 PM
14

These are all great counter-arguments. Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/23 08:58 PM
21

One problem with Stoever's argument is as follows: how does anonymous harassment between gamers (she even admits female students are more often anonymous when gaming) deprive them of equal access to education?
/r/MensRights26/10/23 07:16 PM
43

One problem with Stoever's argument is as follows: how does anonymous harassment between gamers (she even admits female students are more often anonymous when gaming) deprive them of equal access to education?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/23 07:16 PM
25

Give us some specifics. What university is this? Can you link to a page of one of the scholarships? What locations are female-exclusive? If we know details, we can file a complaint, assuming it's in the US. The reason these things continue is because people don't file complaints.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 01:17 PM
97

In the past few months i've been watching as the us military is struggling to fill it's ranks during peacetime. Imagine how it will be during war time, the government that systematically discriminates against men in family courts, criminal courts, and ultimately in a legal sense. One of my go-to sayings when I see things like this is, why should a man fight with his life for a country that refuses to fight for him with words? My body, my choice.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 04:26 PM
1

There are numerous other problems. It labels as harassment unwanted jokes, drinks, flirts, and compliments. An unwanted joke - apparently a joke of any kind per the sign - is not harassment. Buying someone at the other end of the bar a drink, only to discover the drink is unwanted, is not harassment. Attempting to flirt with someone, only to promptly bow out once you discover they aren't really into you, is not harassment. Thanking a coworker for helping you with a project the other day when tha…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:07 AM
2

Well yeah, staring is not glancing. But the sign does say attention, which is incredibly broad. Attention could simply mean listening or glancing someone's way. I agree that constant stares are a problem.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 12:33 AM
1

Constantly, sure. Glancing someone's way for half a second when they didn't specifically want you to is not harassment, however. The sign's language is so broad that it encompasses both.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 11:45 PM
38

There was no Title IX accusation made to the university described in the article, so he didn't need to defend himself against that. The school took action anyway. Croft was suspended without notice or the opportunity to be heard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/23 06:59 PM
56

This is a rare interview between an accused student and the media because the father is also present for the interview. Usually, if the accused student speaks at all, he is speaking by himself, for himself. The father's support here is a nice element. We have this lawsuit in our Title IX Lawsuits Database here - https://titleixforall.com/title-ix-lawsuits-database/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/23 05:04 PM
35

This is a rare interview between an accused student and the media because the father is also present for the interview. Usually, if the accused student speaks at all, he is speaking by himself, for himself. The father's support here is a nice element. We have this lawsuit in our Title IX Lawsuits Database here - https://titleixforall.com/title-ix-lawsuits-database/
/r/MensRights19/10/23 05:03 PM
28

Women have always been compensated ("given reparations") throughout all of history. It's called the male provider role.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/23 11:06 PM
9

Too much of Reeves concern is about "losing men and boys to the political right." He never criticizes feminism in any capacity, broadly talks about how good it is without exception, and says the only failing of the left regarding men is that it has ignored men (not, you know, actively been hostile to men).
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:19 PM
25

IMO, it's more like feminists are Tradcons 2.0 but without any of the traditional perks for men.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:23 AM
9

Much of the information here is either baseless, lacks sufficient evidence, or is incorrect. It is well established fact that the majority of rape accusations are not false, with only around 10% max being false. It is not well-established fact. No one knows the exact or even approximate amount of false claims, but most credible studies/analyses show them several times higher than the baseline false crime reporting rate (2%). It is also not established that the majority of accusations are true. E…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 08:43 PM
17

How will you know whether it is unwanted without first giving her some form of attention, which may or may not be unwanted?
/r/MensRights29/09/23 07:12 PM
15

Your viewing this post and commenting on it is unwanted attention, therefore your behavior is harassment. And if you don't understand the irony or the point, you are not okay (or you're trolling, in which case well done).
/r/MensRights29/09/23 06:28 PM
4

Gotta find someone with a vampire fetish.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 05:56 PM
113

My go-to response/framing: Yeah, of course some women fear that about men. Some white people fear that about black people, too, and often for the same reasons. We have to start putting them on the back foot. And keep them there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 05:17 PM
85

It's the classic feminist two-step to institutionalizing their bigotry through statistics: Expand the definition of harm beyond all reason Apply the expanded definition only to men
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:34 PM
6

Buying someone a drink, I suppose.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:31 PM
43

Well 2% is the margin of error and it's probably fair to say 1% of women are probably sequestered from society due to hospice care, a coma, etc. So that's probably why it is not 100%. They tried to get it to 100%, but they just couldn't!
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:27 PM
26

Thank you! After your reply I found it here - https://www.bristolnights.co.uk/
/r/MensRights29/09/23 04:19 PM
272

Note also the left side saying "97% of women have been sexually harassed." Of course, if you define sexual harassment that broadly, almost any woman could be portrayed as a victim, and any man a villain. Edit: also, if anyone can find the website for this org (it's in the UK) please post it here.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 03:28 PM
7

You're welcome. I plan on doing a lot more writing going forward!
/r/MensRights28/09/23 08:30 PM
6

California is already one step ahead. Gavin Newsome will soon sign a bill reflexively punishing men with legal fees, including punitive damages, when their defamation lawsuits against false rape accusers are unsuccessful. - https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/california-metoo-bill-discourage-defamation-lawsuits-1234827503/
/r/MensRights28/09/23 06:22 PM
27

Thank you! Edit: yes, they are making their true selves known.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 02:01 PM
1

but 80-90% of the music schools and parents require only female teacher, because they thought woman have better at psychology than male Is this in the U.S., and do you have any of this in writing, or any other evidence? People can go to bat for you on this if you do.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 04:11 PM
96

It seems that when it comes to men’s issues the left are totally unwilling to advocate for them and the right are totally incompetent. My take would be that the left is generally hostile to them (not merely ignoring them), and the right is generally either incompetent, disingenuous, or just grifting (or all three).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 11:48 AM
2

If: The claims asserted in the complaint are true that the sex acts were consensual, UNM initiated an investigation without authorization, UNM failed to follow up on leads that would provide exculpatory evidence, and UNM's investigators omitted or exaggerated in their report in a manner biased against the accused, and There is nothing significantly more to the story Then only a biased or otherwise unfair investigation by the school would have found Doe guilty. We will learn more as the lawsuit d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/23 03:26 PM
1

For a false accuser to be potentially charged? Rare. False reports/accusations? Probably a lot more common than people think.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 01:40 AM
21

They could be leaving because the other party is verbally or physically abusive. Right, and in a just world, that would have to be proven in a fair judicial process before the government forcibly takes away someone's home and children. We shouldn't deny an entire class of citizens the rights to their homes or their children just because some people are abusive. What we have now is the opposite problem: a system that allows abusers to break faith with their innocent spouses, take the house they j…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 02:05 AM
4

It was a forum-based website that existed years ago. It no longer exists.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:42 PM
173

No fault divorce would work well if the party who wanted to leave just left, by themselves. Instead, the party who leaves often wants to take everything with them - kids, house, etc. The party breaching the agreement is rewarded for their breach.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 09:19 PM
1

We do that with our website, titleixforall.com. We use "Title IX" in the name because we work with professionals who understand Title IX law/practice and are in the trenches, but the general public at whom the YouTube channel would be directed is not in the trenches, so Title IX doesn't instantly resonate or mean anything to someone who doesn't know anything about it. And nowadays, when non-Title IX professionals know anything about Title IX, it tends to be about trans/gender identity issues, be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/23 05:17 PM
1

Will do!
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:56 PM
1

Don't worry, we'll be discrete.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 02:51 PM
6

It's like arguing a penalty for rape would encourage false rape accusers to come forward, so we should just stop punishing people for rape.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 05:10 AM
2

A principal presides over a particular school campus, e.g., High School Principal, Elementary School Principle. A superintendent presides over a school district, e.g., Rockwall ISD Superintendent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 04:38 AM
6

Thanks, you bring up a good point!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 02:04 AM
5

Thank you. I like the wordplay! I think we have just chosen a name. Can't reveal it just yet, but you may see some videos from us around October!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/23 01:20 AM
9

Thanks. I feel like we're more or less in the right ballpark with "Schoolboy Advocate." I may want to substitute "sons" in place of boys (which seems to refer to K-4th grade) per se, since most of the videos would address higher ed or middle/high school.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/23 11:42 PM
3

Thank you, I appreciate the comment. I think you made a good point that while a general scope is good, some preference of perspective should be given to parents. I can never remember what FIRE stands for and wouldn’t connect it to education. FIRE used to mean Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (they changed it to "for Expression"). Their tagline is "Free speech makes free people." Our own organization is called Title IX for All, which is very specific and works with professional pract…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 11:37 PM
1

Thanks, I'm definitely prepared for being targeted (as prepared as I can be, anyway). The intended audience is a general audience, but the videos may also interest students, parents, advocates, and legal professionals.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 11:20 PM
2

You're welcome. And yes, the CA decision is a very poor one. Other court decisions (like the Sixth Circuit's Doe v. U-Cincinnati) have held that cross-examination is primarily required when the case is a he said / she said and it comes down to a determination of the parties' credibility. But here, the Supreme Court of California didn't make any such distinction and struck down cross-examination wholesale, eliminating the requirement that appellate courts in the same state have upheld.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:02 PM
6

When I say it's not on the fringes, I mean not on the fringes of feminism. Not that it is not on the fringes of academia. Also, post the name of the book. The name of the book is literally in the title of the post. Please try to read more fully and please try not to assume the worst possible interpretation when evaluating what you read. Those whose readings you discuss will thank you (thank you).
/r/MensRights14/07/23 03:52 AM
7

I'm cracking up at OP acting like this is some kind of compulsory or required general education course. I (OP) did not make that claim. Others in the comments may have interpreted it that way, but I did not. On the contrary, instead of referring to "general education courses," I referred to "courses on feminist legal thought." And I never mentioned or implied anything about it being compulsory.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 02:52 AM
9

There's certainly a difference between saying a philosophy is bad, and saying people should not be allowed to study it. Similarly, if schools want to teach Marxism, Nazism, white nationalism, etc., as legitimate philosophies, they can technically do so (not that they should, of course). It will just be more difficult to convince the general public that they serve a public good and ask them to contribute their hard-earned tax dollars toward it.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 12:22 AM
20

Endorsed as legitimate schools of legal thought. If anything is explicitly rejected at least in part, it is liberal feminism (see early in the Table of Contents "The feminist critique of liberalism," p. 127).
/r/MensRights13/07/23 10:20 PM
50

If a man is declared incompetent in the presence of a woman, it is because the man is a misogynist. If a woman is declared incompetent in the presence of a man, it is because the declarant is a misogynist. If they didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards. Also: a person who takes everything personally is a toxic narcissist who should be avoided. We have those in everyday life, but it's worse when someone has a sexist motivation for it.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:27 PM
1

Thanks for your work here. I'll think about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/23 01:22 AM
3

It's unfortunate. I will miss this sub. The mods and community did a good job here. But I understand. I do wish there were more/better alternatives. Ultimately, it's the mods' call.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/23 12:16 AM
8

Yeah, either this person is being assisted by an organization or other individuals, or they are just using a form letter, switching out the names for each school, and accusing every school they run across without there being any real basis to the accusation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/23 03:41 AM
19

I post these monthly to keep people apprised of Title IX events. There is always something happening, whether "up high" on the level of the Department of Education or at the circuit court level, or "down low" in various trial courts, along with cultural battles both in the broader society and in academic institutions. If you are aware of any additional Title IX news from May that is not posted in the link, please feel free to post it here!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/23 06:43 PM
10

Why? Lol, we tried my guy, we tried but we got the whole horde against us. Civil rights movements of the past had a lot against them as well. They were rebuffed and knocked down. But they kept coming back. They were relentless. If any movement wants to make progress, it can't cite past setbacks as a reason to not be relentless. Progress is being made on many fronts. And more progress will come, so long as advocates are disciplined and courageous.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 04:07 PM
7

Good job.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 03:12 AM
5

Student loans and even COVID relief count as federal funding.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 11:39 PM
5

Title IX is a federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in all educational programs and activities by institutions that receive federal funding. It applies to all 50 U.S. states.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 11:08 PM
5

Thanks. We'll keep at it!
/r/MensRights26/05/23 10:25 PM
8

You're right, blocking the regs won't be enough. We need change in many places. Changes in law, regulations, politics, and culture - both our general culture and the culture of our institutions. It's gonna be a long road.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 10:20 PM
20

This postponement gives advocates for due process all more time to prepare and raises interesting questions about the ease of schools making such adjustments in the middle of an academic year, the effective date of the new regulations, and so forth. When the final rule is released, it will no doubt reflect much of the anti-due process measures embodied in the draft version. But with the effective date being moved back nearly half a year, accused students will be afforded these due process protec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/23 09:36 PM
1

This is only quasi-political but I think we need to form an organization that provides free/low-cost Title IX defense to accused men We are considering offering services in the near future as a low-cost advisor to students during the school's Title IX investigation and adjudication processes. It's unlikely that we'll see attorneys consistently offering pro bono or low-cost legal representation. The cases are extremely expensive and last years, and most students are just trying to clear their nam…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/23 07:46 PM
19

Thank you. It seems a lot of men's advocacy circles have become complaint and defeatism echo chambers. Progress is being made on many fronts if you zoom in to specific issues. And the barriers people treat as barriers aren't as concrete as people make them out to be. Even if you are an average Joe or Jane, you can make an impact. You just have to be disciplined and relentless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/23 12:12 AM
2

Thanks. Our website offers a database that lists all the lawsuits (850+ now) by accused students. It has about 100k pages of court documents, case summaries, sections dedicated to key judicial decisions, and a host of other related records. It's a huge cost to maintain and develop it, so we have to require a subscription, but for people who need it (usually attorneys, accused students and their parents, researchers) there really is nothing like it elsewhere. I'm thinking of doing a YouTube chann…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/23 08:05 PM
3

You bet!
/r/MensRights05/05/23 03:59 AM
6

Thank you, you're welcome.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 11:38 PM
3

Thank you for saying this. I agree entirely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 05:54 PM
26

I post these "Title IX Recaps" every month to invite discussion on what has been going on with sex discrimination in education, particularly higher ed. There is so much that is going on that it is impossible to put them all in one post, but I do my best to consolidate the highest-profile events. Please feel free to comment on the April's news, or if you think anything should be added let me know in the comments!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 03:45 PM
37

It is true that there are serious challenges and biases that men's advocates face that feminists are extremely privileged to be insulated from. Feminists do not regularly face screaming hordes of people shouting down their speaking events, assaulting them on campus, making career-ending false allegations against them because they don't like what they are saying, or people harassing their employers to terminate them simply because they hear a different point of view. Instead, they have all this o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 03:42 AM
1

There are two separate Doe v. University of Illinois lawsuits in the image. Same name, but different case #s (2:17-cv-02180 and 2:19-cv-02054; see the case # column 5th from the left). Common in accused student litigation for separate lawsuits to have the same name. There are over ten "Doe v. Regents of the University of California" lawsuits, for example, with the same name, but different case numbers. Doe v. Robinson is the third lawsuit against U-Illinois. A fourth lawsuit did not have Judge B…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 03:32 AM
13

Judge Colin did not give any reason particular to himself. He just pointed to 28 U.S.C. §455, which is rather broad. It's probably some kind of relationship, even if indirectly, with one of the individual defendants.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/23 04:14 AM
3

You're right that I only linked files for one of the lawsuits. Separately, I linked a database snapshot of some of Judge Bruce's rulings on three of the other four lawsuits.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 02:51 AM
40

I wanted to put this lawsuit out there for the community to look at to get a feel for these kinds of lawsuits and how they get rolling. Interested in any comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/23 07:28 PM
6

I think that the best way is to specialize in specific issues, prioritizing the issues where we can get the most leverage. For example, areas of discrimination where we can file complaints. Education, the workforce, etc. This will help make progress that can be measured and get advocates into the trenches. Maybe establish a non-partisan "League of Men's Voters" that build coalitions to vote for candidates based on men's interests/needs. This is really a marathon, not a sprint, so we need discipl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 07:05 PM
3

You're welcome!
/r/MensRights04/04/23 11:12 PM
7

We post these monthly to give the community a quick snapshot of what has been going on in the Title IX world over the previous month, with a focus on litigation, advocacy, and policy. What do you think about these events? Did we miss anything? Post in the comments!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/23 01:00 PM
3

There is some concern over how faithful they are to the process. Around 200,000 comments by the public on the new Title IX regulations were deleted and removed from public view by the Department of Education due to a "clerical error." CLERICAL ERROR IN TITLE IX COMMENT COUNT: Wondering why the number of comments on the Biden administration’s Title IX rule dropped from 349,177 comments on Tuesday? The department found a clerical error with a comment unrelated to the proposed regulation that boost…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 04:10 PM
16

In 2017, under Trump/Secretary of Education Betsy Devos, the Dept. of Ed rescinded the 2011 Obama-era "guidance" and later issued regulations that took effect in August 2020 granting accused students greater due process protections. Starting around 2019, lawsuits by accused students began to drop. By 2022, they dropped by nearly 75% from their 2017/2018 highs. No doubt COVID played some part, but in reality lawsuits began declining much sooner. The Biden administration has started a new rulemaki…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 03:17 AM
1

I talked to Paul. He told me the Register Her website was taken down due to a cyberattack. Haven't seen https://dontdateher.org/ before. Was it taken down, or do you know if it will it be developed in the future? I have reserved a domain for a potential future registry site. If I develop it, it will probably take a while, but if/when I do launch it, it will be done thoroughly and be a good tool and resource.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 12:47 AM
1

No problem. Thank you for focusing on solutions! We need more people with that mindset.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 11:44 PM
6

It's a good question, and you're right: it's unacceptable. I think we need to put together a false accuser's registry of sorts and start naming names. Or at least something like that. Maybe start a group of your own on Facebook/etc. In my experience looking at defamation cases the law really only affords very limited solutions and you have to have a very tight case. Unfortunately, a lawsuit can even end up financially harming the plaintiff, which can leave him worse than before. Without knowing …
/r/MensRights23/03/23 07:02 PM
4

Have to echo this. Defamation cases are notoriously difficult to win, in large part because courts tend to err on the side of protecting speech with very narrow exceptions and much of the public believes defamation laws prohibit broader areas of speech than they do. If it's not a very narrow exception - e.g., a false rape claim that you can prove to be false, that caused provable damages, etc. - I would forgo a lawsuit. I believe we have under-utilized the solution of countering bad speech with …
/r/MensRights23/03/23 06:02 PM
41

Investigators and school officials have been known to deliberately falsify a student's words in their written reports, including adding false confessions. It then becomes the student's word against the investigator's. Recently, there was a lawsuit where this exact thing happened. See page seven of this complaint for Smith v. Brown University. An excerpt: David and his advisor were distrustful of the process and felt compelled to record his interview with the investigator to protect himself. Davi…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 10:19 PM
7

Labels are a tricky thing. For example, I define liberal values as including things like equal treatment, freedom of speech, and human rights for all. Modern feminism tends to be very illiberal in that it often has a hard time respecting these values, and often opposes them. Socialists/communists are more likely to recognize men's issues, but they do not dominate the conversation of equality like the radical identitarians on the left do. Your average diversity officer is not going to be a Marxis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/23 10:09 PM
40

If you're in a one-party consent state, record the meeting if you can, without their knowledge. This is a good resource. Some of these meetings are fishing expeditions. Try not to say anything that could be twisted into making yourself look guilty. I'd also avoid using your school email address ([email protected]) for anything social. Good luck.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 09:42 PM
46

Leftists closer to the center, or "disaffected liberals," are a better crowd than hard-leftists in this regard. Hard-left spaces are often heavily locked into a binary mentality where one group is the oppressed and the other group is the oppressor. Thus, one group's issues are embraced and the other group's issues are categorically ignored. There is no such mentality as "everyone has issues, even if to a greater or lesser degree, and we should address all of them." Even further: discrimination i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/23 03:32 PM
35

I'm honestly surprised at the amount of effort that has been expended to maintain a foothold on this platform which is openly hostile to men and has even explicitly excluded men from its policies on hate speech.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 08:05 PM
5

Considering making one. Already got the domain.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:34 AM
1

Our pleasure!
/r/MensRights08/03/23 12:49 AM
2

Thanks. We're always up to something :)
/r/MensRights06/03/23 08:18 PM
5

Thank you, mods!
/r/MensRights04/03/23 04:31 AM
22

Hello, I submitted this Recap to keep everyone aware of what is going on in the Title IX world. A mod requested that I post these monthly Recaps here. This Recap is a summary of what happened in February of this year with links to news reports, lawsuits, and so forth. Please feel free to add anything noteworthy that I may have missed in the comments section.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 11:23 PM
3

Probably 30-60%. All stats on sexual assault, false reporting, underreporting, and so forth, should be taken with a huge grain of salt, because there is so much repression of accurate ways to measure/interpret the data, and so much institutional support of misleading ways to measure/interpret the data. It makes sense that the number probably swings higher the more informal the fact-finding and punishment processes are, and dips lower the more investment and accountability is required of the accu…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 09:53 PM
23

Thanks. We will :)
/r/MensRights17/02/23 08:51 PM
18

If anyone has evidence of large numbers of students committing suicide as a direct result of a Title IX accusation (as opposed to data saying large numbers of men are committing suicide without specifying the direct cause), we can definitely make use of it. Feel free to link/send.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 07:15 PM
44

We will.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:51 PM
33

We wanted to post this to highlight this point: accusations of misconduct are not just life-altering, but sometimes life-ending, which makes fair procedures and false allegations that much more worthy of our attention. There are at least four cases where parents have sued on behalf of their children who have committed suicide after being accused of Title IX misconduct in a higher ed setting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/23 03:44 PM
4

Hello, I submitted this Recap to keep everyone aware of what is going on in the Title IX world. This is a summary of what happened in November of this year with links to news reports, lawsuits, and so forth. Please feel free to add anything noteworthy that I may have missed in the comments section.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/22 07:33 PM
11

I am posting this because this is very new to me and I am wondering...has anyone seen this before?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/22 01:18 AM
18

In this post, I present four key examples of coalitions of public officials and organizations that oppose the presumption of innocence and advocate immunity for false accusers. Our ability to oppose these groups is limited. Please feel free to add what your thoughts on how we may be able to resist these groups.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/22 07:09 PM
2

All studies on false rape allegations (especially ones with extreme "findings" like 2% or 90%) have flaws, usually in sample size or methodology, but that doesn't mean their findings aren't useful or insightful, especially when you compare them together. I.e., the flaws usually aren't "fatal" to the study. Yes, the biggest advantage from the Kanin study is that he only counted it as a false allegation when the accuser admitted it, meaning the 41% figure likely represented the floor. The sample s…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 08:24 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:13 AM
18

I'm posting this here to keep the community updated on Title IX litigation, policy, and advocacy. A mod requested that I post these monthly Recaps here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/22 07:21 PM
64

It's not a losing battle. We've been having victories on the Title IX front in courts. We've been more successful than we ever anticipated ten years ago. Shared parenting laws are being passed on the state level. "Affirmative action" is being questioned. People turned against Amber Heard, which gave a boost of support for falsely accused men. Paternity leave is increasingly being provided, nearly on par with maternity leave in some places. And so forth. It's not a losing battle. Change is happen…
/r/MensRights26/10/22 03:08 PM
4

That makes sense. Especially when, at this point, there are many cases named "Doe v. Regents of the University of California."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/22 03:28 PM
7

Thank you. Good suggestions!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/22 03:43 AM
11

Thank you, those sound like great suggestions!
/r/MensRights25/10/22 01:57 AM
42

We are planning on making a lot of these...at least 30, and ideally somewhere around 50. Before we get too far down the road, I was hoping to get some feedback on what we have so far. Any feedback is appreciated. Thank you!
/r/MensRights25/10/22 12:15 AM
34

Hello everyone. We are planning on making a lot of these...at least 30, and ideally somewhere around 50. Before we get too far down the road, I was hoping to get some feedback on what we have so far. Any feedback is appreciated. Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/22 12:13 AM
1

If they actually wanted to flip it around and treat male and female how they others are treated in real life, female players would have to pay more for everything because they would be expected to be the breadwinners, and when they "go to jail" they would spend twice as long there.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:38 PM
5

"Survivor" organizations will categorically demand immunity for false accusers from defamation suits, even when it is proven that they lied. They will also demand the abolition of the presumption of innocence, particularly in a university setting. They will also demand that accusers have the "right" to have an accused male officially and permanently recorded as guilty, even if the process used to find guilt is determined to be a sham. We reported on/wrote about it here, among other things: https…
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:50 PM
82

"A government that takes from Peter to give to Paul can always count on the support of Paul" is an old saying with enduring relevance. This is no different.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:46 PM
36

She didn't just blame the victim. She falsely accused him of multiple rapes. Unfortunately, this is the kind of person "survivor" organizations will defend.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 03:38 AM
12

Thanks, I'll try to do that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/22 03:20 PM
30

The deletion is extremely suspicious, if not infuriating. It may also be a weakness for the new regulations. I spoke to some attorneys. They are aware of it and considering how they may be able to include it in a legal challenge against the regs once they are finalized and published.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/22 04:44 AM
12

Thank you. Will do!
/r/MensRights08/10/22 12:36 AM
24

Assume less, ask more, and jump to fewer conclusions. We never said such incredibly broad statements ("all," "always"). We already reported it in August here - https://twitter.com/TitleIXforAll/status/1558634911086542852 Note well these words: "We've included this in our database because the plaintiffs technically are claiming they suffered discipline against them that was sex-biased." If we include any case in our database, we are not only committing hours of work to it, we are in fact paying m…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:16 PM
8

Hello AutoMod/Mods. As stated in the post, there is a huge battle heating up for due process, and I want to make everyone aware of it. The last 30 days really highlights what we are up against, so I thought I would post September's Recap. Edit: thank you, mods!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/22 08:03 PM
8

This comment is not suggesting that schools abandon their own presumption of innocence for the respondent. The suggestion is for schools to not tell the parties about any presumption It's both. "This formal presumption and notice of such a presumption"
/r/MensRights06/10/22 01:47 AM
7

The good news, at least, is that the due process side is beginning to build coalitions of their own. It's still very lopsided, of course.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:55 PM
1

Sorry for the late reply. I've been collecting them for twelve years. They say "the internet is forever," but it really isn't. Some of these images were originally posted in publications and forums that no longer exist.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:07 AM
1

Title IX laws/litigation are constantly in flux. They are also joined at the hip with many other competing agendas and interests. This is basically a recap of April. Is this description sufficient? I don't know 🤷
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 09:50 PM
22

I thought this would be a good article because it's always great to dig into new research that makes these kinds of conclusions. I've only begun to read through the study, but I hope this opens up the discussion here. Is this a study that does well establishing its credibility and reaches credible conclusions based on the researchers' data and methods? Are its findings impactful? Does the article exaggerate the findings of the study or is it fairly on point?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/22 10:28 PM
5

Paywalled from the link in the article, but here's the study.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 10:10 PM
15

If they are going to do these kinds of investigations/adjudications, they really need to use a "clear and convincing" (~70% probability of guilt) standard. Using a preponderance standard ("50% plus a feather," as some have described it) affords universities too much wiggle room, too much plausible deniability for their biased proceedings. Regarding discovery, the 2020 regulations mandated a pseudo-discovery phase where both parties could review and respond to the evidence before the completion o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/22 12:06 AM
11

This is the way. Try to only worry about what you can control/influence, hash out some basic prevention and response strategies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 08:01 PM
33

I thought this might be an interesting post to share because we don't hear too much about Title IX-related accusations in same-sex relationships. Dartmouth has been sued by accused students at least seven times. 98% of accused students who file lawsuits alleging their rights have been violated in Title IX proceedings are male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 06:32 PM
33

I thought this was an important article to share because it draws questions about the widespread presumption that the only reason for differences in the outcomes between men and women is a lack of equal opportunity or resources. However, this study and article present evidence that this is not necessarily the case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/22 11:11 PM
1

You're welcome!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/22 03:04 AM
43

If you cherry pick all the bad things women had throughout history and all the good things men had, you'd get the idea that men kept women down and kept the best stuff for themselves. If you cherry pick all the bad things men had throughout history and all the good things women had, you'd get the idea that men carried women on their backs throughout all of history with women essentially having a parasitic relationship with men. If you look at the good and bad things both sexes have, you realize …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/22 03:03 AM
3

There is a coalition now. FIRE is one of the big ones. There is also SAVE and FACE. We do more data work that supports the coalition, but we also do advocacy with writing regulatory recommendations to the Department of Education. And there are numerous law firms that also write such recommendations. The support has grown wider more than it has grown taller over the past four years, if that makes sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 04:05 PM
3

There's still a chance they can make some significant missteps, but they have the upper hand for the time being, and they have planned to push Title IX reform next year. The courts are basically on our side, but they are really only accessible by students who happen to have a lot of money. The reality is that so long as our broader culture doesn't change to the extent that both Dem and Republican supporters are willing to stand up for the wrongly accused, men who are accused on campus will be in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 08:04 AM
1

No updates yet.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 07:28 AM
1

Thanks, I'll check it out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/22 12:38 AM
1

Thanks. Will do!
/r/MensRights13/01/22 09:09 PM
8

I posted this because I'm wanting to see if there is any interest in these kinds of "summary of recent events" posts regarding gender equality in academia. I think some people will like to see the tallies of Title IX lawsuits and OCR investigations in particular because they are a good indicator of progress.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/22 04:36 PM
2

Excellent!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 08:25 PM
96

I thought this post was important because it is another example of universities forcing perspectives on students based on shoddy research. This will also inevitably bias investigators (who are often "deputy" investigators from among the faculty) against accused students.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 07:50 PM
3

I know this may seem picky, but how do you define left wing? If you mean a strong focus on egalitarianism and civil liberties, then that's us. We work on U.S. higher ed issues. But there is some tension there because we oppose Biden's Title IX reforms inasmuch as they seek to reduce due process for accused students, and we generally oppose "affirmative action"-type policies, instead advocating for equal treatment as a baseline approach.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 07:23 AM
38

In introduced my wife to my advocacy work before we got married. We were already boyfriend/girlfriend. She was supportive when she saw the work I was doing. After we got married she started helping me with it, mainly by doing data entry and social media work. I think this stuff can really go sharply one way or the other, to be honest. And while I think part of it depends on the kind of person you are dating, I think a lot of it also comes down to what you do as an advocate, and the more positive…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 07:17 AM
2

You're welcome!
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:47 PM
4

You bring up a lot of good points. I agree that OCR has too many "clever workarounds," and I agree with several of the suggestions. It is particularly disappointing how formulaic a lot of resolution agreements are: OCR simply announces that the investigated school "expressed a willingness to resolve the complaint by taking the steps set out in the Resolution Agreement." Currently, the investigation's real "teeth" appear to just be drawing bad publicity to the school and taking up administrators'…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 11:30 PM
1

Got it. Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 11:12 PM
16

This year is definitely a year to show up and fight, because the Biden administration will try to rewrite the rules on Title IX, and this will bring all the organizations that support or oppose due process for accused students out of the woodwork. It's a "strike while the iron is hot" kind of year!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/22 05:23 PM
39

Yeah. That and attorney's fees. Unfortunately, universities tend to use insurance in combination with other funds to pay for settlements. One thing I'd really like to see is insurance companies suing universities over these settlement payouts, because if universities are deliberately flouting the law and then using insurance to pay for settlements, the insurance companies could have a good case for insurance fraud. And then that adds a group of litigants with deep pockets and more legal resource…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:38 PM
18

Yeah. I'm thinking of making advice videos for college-age men and advising them on which women to avoid. This emotionally unstable person could be a good example.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 06:24 PM
11

Yeah. And we've seen cases where it seems an incident really did happen, but the accused student was misidentified.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 03:52 AM
33

He's not suing the accuser. He's suing the university and alleging an unfair process. Schools have to provide a fair and nondiscriminatory process when they investigate accused students regardless of whether there is proof the accuser lied in a parallel criminal case. Edit: the flair should probably be different, though.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 09:26 PM
21

Here is the complaint if you want to read it. We keep track of all these lawsuits (now over 760!) in our lawsuits database.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 09:08 PM
2

Are you aware of any case law that might directly support the conclusion that programs can't use gendered language in title and description when it refers to the participants and the program can't legally discriminate? Unfortunately, I am not aware of any.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/21 08:07 AM
20

I thought this post would be important because it demonstrates that our work can reach incredibly far if we are disciplined and diligent. Cornell is one of the worse schools in terms of the rights of male students accused of Title IX-related misconduct; they have been sued thirteen times in the past seven years, with about a 50% success/settlement rate by plaintiffs. For them to start even tacitly acknowledging that there are problems when it comes to the rights of accused students can only be a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/21 03:31 AM
4

You're welcome!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/21 12:32 AM
23

I thought this article would be good to submit because it provides recent research (published this year) on a trend that we long known to be true. The scope of the research is a bit limited, so that must be acknowledged: it studied the responses to one online publication over the course of two years regarding female sex offenders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/21 11:21 PM
3

A nice reminder that men's rights is not a right-wing issue. It's because modern left-wing identity politics heavily commits the apex fallacy by assuming that the properties of the topmost members of a group (in this case men) are true about the group (men) in general. It has become less about advocating for people on the bottom than it has been about advocating against the people on the top. If it were otherwise, they would recognize which sex makes up the majority of the incarcerated, the home…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 11:16 PM
14

Over 700 lawsuits have been filed by accused students in response to the Lhamon-era approach to presuming the guilt of accused students. Why would such a spectacularly divisive person such as Lhamon be nominated and confirmed? What does this say for our commitment to civil liberties and gender equality? And how did we get here?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 02:34 PM
3

The real issue of course is that colleges have no business judging actions which are felony crimes. Cases of sexual assault and other such accusations should be handled by our legal system, not our education system. I agree! Schools can provide accommodations (housing, coursework, counseling), but should leave the judging of felony accusations to those better suited.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:33 PM
2

Thanks, yeah Mattress Girl in particular would be a good one to include.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 09:25 PM
3

Just images for the purposes of this post, but I have another compilation called "The Language of Anti-Male Bias in Academia" that I want to republish soon that focuses just on quotes / statements and no visuals/images. If/when I republish it (likely in the next two weeks) I'll link it here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/21 08:41 PM
2

Love it. Great idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/21 07:42 PM
10

It was originally published in 2013. It was then unpublished a few years later when the website went through some serious changes and republished now. In a perfect world I would have republished it sooner, but I was overwhelmed with other work, particularly our lawsuits database.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/21 03:52 PM
45

Bias against men and boys in academia is an intergenerational, decades-old problem. Many are unaware of the nature of that bias – its sophistry, duplicity, spite, and sometimes sheer hatred. This compilation aims to inform the public by documenting that bias when it is presented visually in the form of banners, posters, and other visuals. Things like the "castrate" banner at Duke University, the "Dudetip" posters at UCLA, or the posters saying "if both the guy and the girl are drunk and have sex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/21 02:17 PM
9

The good guys won. The Department of Education, under Betsy DeVos (Trump administration), issued regulations requiring schools to provide due process (the basic right to defend oneself) to students accused of Title IX-related offenses (sexual harassment, rape, dating violence, etc.) before being kicked out and essentially blacklisted from higher ed. Accusers' rights groups who oppose due process for accused students brought five lawsuits in federal court trying to prevent them from being impleme…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 01:48 AM
31

The 2020 Title IX regulations gave students accused of Title IX-related offenses greater due process rights and created greater accountability in the system overall. Here are some examples: The definition of sexual harassment aligns with the Supreme Court definition, reducing abusive false accusations by narrowing its definition The potential standard of evidence in determining guilt is raised overall, providing greater due process protections A mandatory pseudo-discovery phase allows parties to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 08:04 PM
4

He almost certainly will, but it won't be the same game as 10 years ago when Obama did it.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 07:37 PM
15

These defeats to challenges to the regulations are important because they help solidify the fact that the 2020 Title IX regulations were developed with great care and attention to due diligence (not to mention the need). While the current administration will attempt to water down, weaken, or undo the regulations, these victories appear to prove, at least, that the regs are not easily assailable (if at all, really) via the court system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 06:57 PM
44

If women were oppressed throughout history, it begs the question as to why men didn't send them to die in wars or dangerous jobs like they did for men, or why they have historically imprisoned men at a far higher rate. To name a few. If you cherry-pick all the good things men had and all the bad things women had, it would seem like women were oppressed. But doing so does not paint an accurate picture...it just reveals what parts of the picture society cares about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/21 04:14 PM
6

It's so fucking annoying how people would just blindly believe women, because "the data says X or Y" and if you ask them where the data comes from, they say it is from a survey The plural of anecdotal evidence is survey.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/21 07:48 AM
3

Mods, thank you for stickying this post!
/r/MensRights21/07/21 06:28 AM
20

Not even feminists agree on what feminism is. They generally do, you just have to look for the common denominators. I learned this when reading up on Feminist Jurisprudence, an actual academic discipline. Socialist feminism believes that gender is socially constructed ("patriarchy"), and in order to remedy the disparities we will need to accord women certain special privileges. But they aren't really special privileges, because we live in a Patriarchy.™ Radical, Marxist, and even Eco- feminists …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/21 06:33 AM
1

Which school is this? Do you have a link to the camp program on their website? We might be able to file a complaint with this.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 02:37 PM
5

Great article. Thank you for this. Sharing it!
/r/MensRights16/06/21 07:51 PM
6

A settlement offer is pretty much guaranteed at this point.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 07:43 PM
3

It's said the opposite of love is not hate but indifference. So...indifference toward men's humanity, vulnerabilities, and needs seems to be a common theme. Not sure what single word best describes it being applied to men and boys, though.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:54 PM
3

Thank you, sounds like good advice. I appreciate it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 05:22 PM
3

Not yet, I'll take a look. Thank you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/21 05:22 PM
1

Thanks, yeah, if Subscribestar can save me enough time so I can just put that time back into creating content that may work. I'll give them a second look.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 02:53 PM
1

Thanks for the tip. I took a look at Subscribestar. Their fee is 11%, and it's not clear if that includes payment processing. I think I'll just create my own through Paypal (fees are ~3-4%) and cut out the middleman. It's not difficult if you're used to using PayPal, and I can integrate it with the database web app software I use for other Title IX things. Also...Subscribestar's terms list the following as prohibited: using the site or its content...To harass, abuse, insult, harm, defame, slande…
/r/MensRights15/06/21 02:39 PM
28

Thanks! I also submitted a 42-page comment to the Department of Education. I'll probably post it to the subreddit as well.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:54 PM
12

Thanks!
/r/MensRights11/06/21 07:35 PM
2

Not quite, thankfully. We have ten years of court decisions supporting the kinds of protections Biden wants to erode. The notice and comment period under Devos for the current regulations was very thorough, and the regulations themselves relied upon court decisions. All of that can be useful in a lawsuit to overturn regulatory changes by the current administration. Less reliable but still useful is the fact that they almost certainly won't be able to accomplish these changes by midterms, where w…
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:57 PM
1

Exactly, but then that's a 3rd-party solution.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 11:31 PM
26

They are not. But per Supreme Court interpretations of Title IX set forth in the 90s, that is what they are doing. Universities have an inherent conflict of interest that will prejudice them toward one party or the other. It's virtually impossible for them to be neutral adjudicators.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 04:22 PM
17

The woman in the above article got 4 years. But this woman here (https://bit.ly/3obnG5e) got 4 months and didn't have to register as a sex offender. What do they both share? A complete surprise that they were punished at all.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:49 PM
2

Thanks. Yeah, we're playing the long game here.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 11:50 AM
1

My guess is this is Gogte Institute of Technology in India. Disclaimer: assuming this is true, of course.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 10:30 PM
1

You're welcome!
/r/MensRights02/04/20 10:21 PM
3

I'm not exactly sure of that number, if you're referring to both respondents who believe the school railroaded them out (of which 98% are men) and complainants who believe the school was noncompliant in how it treated them (I'm unsure of what % are male/female here, but the consensus is a clear majority female). My sense is that overall the number of plaintiffs is roughly even in both categories, but the latter is over-represented in class-action lawsuits, which receive greater media notoriety a…
/r/MensRights01/04/20 08:31 PM
5

You're welcome!
/r/MensRights01/04/20 06:22 PM
5

Our count doesn't include those. What you are referring to are either internal Title IX complaints made directly to a school administration in behalf of an affected group (men) or to the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights (OCR). A professor named Mark Perry makes many of the internal Title IX complaints and has seen some success (example).
/r/MensRights01/04/20 06:21 PM
1

April Fools, maybe?
/r/MensRights01/04/20 05:20 PM
2

It's not the same as #metoo. These are administrators, not a biological class of citizens. It's not a requirement to rape women to be a man. It is a requirement to disregard due process to be a Title IX Coordinator. But in the off-chance that an administrator actually cares about due process, let them post on their school's website that they guarantee specific procedural rights, including prompt notice, a chance to see all the evidence and present and question witnesses, use of a clear and convi…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:40 PM
1

Thanks for the sticky!
/r/MensRights26/09/19 08:31 PM
1

Get this guide and read as much as you can - "How To Defend Yourself In A Campus Sexual Assault Case" ​ If your state legally allows it, record the hearing without their knowledge or consent. It could be very useful later, depending on what happens. Go to page 3 here to see.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:12 AM
2

Excerpt: "John claimed he asked Ann for consent 'before the unprotected contact' and twice during the 'short time' where he wore no condom. Ann would eventually tell campus investigators otherwise." His lawsuit against Yale is in our Title IX Legal database at https://bit.ly/2VwiwWB
/r/MensRights10/05/19 06:09 PM
27

Of course feminism is about equality. 100% of women should be equal to the top 1% of men. Equality! You see, they aren't lying folks. (/s)
/r/MensRights26/04/19 08:22 PM
2

We wrote about CASA's flaws back in 2014 here - https://www.titleixforall.com/the-campus-accountability-and-safety-act-casa-a-flawed-response-to-an-exaggerated-campus-rape-problem/
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:16 AM
1

Yeah, this only makes the school look vindictive.
/r/MensRights29/03/19 09:07 AM
3

IMO you don't need to "learn rhetoric." This is one of the biggest mistakes advocates make. Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. The truth, flatly stated, doesn't always set you free. That doesn't mean people need to lie. But advocacy and rhetorical strategy is a skill that should be learned. To be an advocate and convince others to share your worldview, you need to be a bit of a salesman.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 07:23 AM
6

Ironic for a school named Liberty, isn't it?
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:00 PM
3

I'd bet good money he didn't say a peep when the 2011 Dear Colleague Letter came out.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:00 PM
116

Also, any law or policy that prioritizes women's health funding over men's.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:24 PM
40

Not really. Boys aren't taught to identify bad female behavior in the same way girls are taught to identify bad male behavior. This leaves them unprepared and defenseless once they enter the dating/relationship world.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 09:53 PM
55

Here are the sources for this. Butterfly Ball - http://www.standrewsch.org/student-life/butterflyball.cfm This special evening for fathers (uncles, grandfathers or other father figures) and daughters is to help the girls learn how to behave on a date and the proper way a young lady should be treated. This is an opportunity for a special male in their life to show her how a gentleman should treat her. Some suggested ways to show her might be to start with dinner before the dance or ice cream afte…
/r/MensRights19/01/19 09:35 PM
2

Even Comic Sans would be better than this font, lol.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:37 PM
9

Limited gov't is the death of feminism.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 10:14 PM
1

Nice seeing you here! ~Jonathan
/r/MensRights04/01/19 10:13 PM
19

Yep. Classic case of the system enabling a psycho. And he was suspended for three and a half years. He is suing because he was railroaded out. She is suing because she's sorry she got caught, even though she got her way with using the system to harm an innocent person.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 04:57 PM
1

Thanks. I'll be more careful in the future.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:27 PM
10

We are suing the heck out of schools right now. By my own tally, there are over 300 lawsuits against them, and we're now winning more than we are losing. I say "we," but it really isn't the men's movement doing the suing per se; it's individual students/families combined with organizations like FACE, FIRE, NCFM-Carolinas, and Title IX For All that help connect them with the right attorneys. If anyone wants to help, we at Title IX For All can definitely use it. We're starting a project soon to ge…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:09 PM
6

Exactly the right approach. No one is entitled to be "believed." They are entitled to be seriously considered.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:24 PM
1

Exactly. We have to start fighting fire with fire here. There is nothing to be ashamed of in doing that.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 08:58 AM
1

It didn't. These suits definitely should.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:48 AM
9

Maybe we need to start tracking these too.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 09:01 AM
16

USC keeps losing lawsuit after lawsuit. They got hit hard in the Ninth Circuit recently. It's entirely possible they are reaching a tipping point. These schools aren't just paying out small settlements anymore like they did 3-4 years ago, back when most lawsuits didn't even survive a motion to dismiss. Now they are paying large settlements on top of attorney's fees, and more often than not their motions to dismiss are failing. They can't keep this up for another 3-4 years at this rate without do…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:48 AM
10

Donno. I checked :( However, that's an athletic department listing rather than a Office of Equity & Diversity listing. They may have just forgotten to remove her as a contact there.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 03:35 AM
11

In addition, it doesn't reveal whether women tend to take longer to say what they are going to say than men (they do). So basically, once women "have the mic," they go on for much longer then men, and the men and other women are only interrupting because they are trying to get a word in edgewise.
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:40 AM
9

NBC made sure that the first part of the headline reads "MRAs are attacking women." So if you are posting the link to some online platforms that cut off the rest of the headline after 35 characters, all you read in the headline is just that. It's the same psychology behind the dating site murderer meme
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:49 PM
2

The bill comes due.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 09:31 PM
1

I didn't even bother posting there, even though I could post a lot. Just looking at it, it's obvious it's an echo chamber for rape accuser advocates, the anti-due process brigade, and nothing else. The best thing you can do is ignore them, really. They are small and inactive, and marching against them in one way or another will just feed into them. Ideally, the sub would be more neutral, but Reddit just isn't set up to guarantee that.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 06:47 AM
2

Nice.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 10:26 PM
11

The problem is it only takes 1. 1 time having a closed door business meeting with the wrong woman, or getting into the elevator with the wrong 1, or carpooling the wrong 1 to a business function.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:23 PM
29

Yes, Feminism is about equality. It's about 100% of women being equal to the top 1% of men, and the other 99% of men can die in a gutter as far as they are concerned. Equality in terms of equal treatment? Equal compassion? Equal human rights? That ship sailed a long time ago.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 04:15 PM
18

He should sue these women for defamation and let his attorney do the talking. He is publicly accused of rape. This is not a science lecture. He should not explain, other than to simply say he is innocent. Anything he says could be used to box him in later. He should definitely not apologize for anything.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 04:20 PM
2

Thanks for the feedback. We've changed it up so that visitors can see the price without needing to register an account or provide any info. It's understandable that in a data-driven age, people want to err on the side of keeping their contact info private. We'll definitely accommodate that.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 05:52 AM
12

Good, these guys deserve to have the book thrown at them. Going in our Legal Database over the weekend.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:29 PM
4

Thank you for stickying this!
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:29 PM
11

"Gender and Sexual Minorities." It's one of the new alphabet soups du jour. Basically they are trying to say we hate gays, lesbians, trans people, etc.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 05:13 PM
5

There are a lot of special interests that have been built up over the last 30 years and have a financial interest in the witch hunts continuing. Attorneys, consultants, risk management professionals, reporters, school personnel (compliance/Title IX/specialized student services personnel) and so forth that are on the wrong side of the issue, that have staked their professional "niche" in this area. And they aren't interested in walking back on any of their positions, because that's like taking a …
/r/MensRights28/11/18 05:04 PM
6

"Progressives" (spoiler: they are actually regressive)
/r/MensRights28/11/18 04:20 PM
5

It's important to look at this stat for what it is. In its broadest form, it is talking about being the victim of any form of violence. Any form. Honestly, who hasn't experienced violence in some form in their lifetime? Can you honestly say no one has hit you, ever? Bit you, kicked you, slapped you, etc? Can any man? How many men have probably experienced violence, ever, in any form? I'd say ~90% of men. For men, violence is a right of passage. Playground fights, sibling rivalry, middle-school s…
/r/MensRights26/11/18 08:42 PM
1

I'll suggest my own site, Title IX For All. It's arguably the only site that comprehensively addresses men's and boys' education issues.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 07:46 PM
20

Pretty dumb for him to say that via email. I recommend you forward that to a non-.edu personal address of yours, print a pdf of it if you can, and save it...just in case.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 10:23 PM
1

Good question.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 07:28 PM
5

A good article. I like how he divides misandry into several categories (personal / historic / political).
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:34 PM
23

If by this you mean your comment, sure.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:54 PM
1

Interesting that they are accusing them of trademark infringement, and their own badge in the featured image has an adapted Star Wars quote ("May the Forest Be With You") written in the same font as the opening to Star Wars.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 03:46 PM
2

Some places have good pay. Teachers get $52k a year starting pay in Fort Worth, TX. Considering you have 2-3 months off, not bad. Being a teacher in lower ed nowadays is putting a big target on your head.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 03:09 PM
1

Thanks. And on that point - there's a difference in cropping a graph's axis slightly to make something more readable without cutting off any data (in this case male/female graduation rates), and on the other hand deliberately cutting off 90% of the axis and the data to create a distortion effect. The data (male/female graduation rates) do not exceed the parameters of the Y-Axis, and the vast majority of the axis's total possible reach is represented, so there is no significant exaggeration. All …
/r/MensRights02/11/18 01:38 PM
46

It gets even worse when Feminist groups try to redefine homelessness away from "living on the street" and make the definition include "living temporarily at a friend's or extended relative's house." The % of women in that group is higher than the % of women who are living on the street, so when you combine both into one "homeless" stat, it makes it appear like homelessness is more equal between men and women, when in reality it is just an obscuring of the data and a way to smokescreen the very r…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 03:25 AM
3

I know this goes against the grain here, but the # of women are packing classes in Health, Education, and Psychology far outnumber gender studies classes. Those 3 fields are 3rd, 4th, and 5th in rank in terms of overall degrees conferred. Gender Studies is way down the list in terms of degrees conferred. It's somewhere around 21st, and even that ranking is split between race studies. TLDR: it's not just the underrepresentation of women in SOME STEM degrees (women are actually near-parity in cert…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:46 PM
2

Since you are in a school, focus on education and student well-being (including suicides). That is directly relevant to your audience. Go here for some good statistics.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:06 PM
2

Any advocate, regardless of issue should have a basic sense of professionalism and people skills, or be willing to develop them. They should be willing to learn how to articulate their perspective, and to retroactively analyze where they could have performed better when the occasion arises. Advocacy requires a bit of a salesmanship mentality. Not in a manipulative way. But you have to know how and when to pick your battles, what language to use, learn how to listen as well as speak, and so forth…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:37 AM
2

Regular video creation is quite a commitment! Good luck. Subscribed.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 05:28 PM
1

It does depend on the article itself if we would publish it though, could I see it? I haven't decided which one to send yet, actually, but I'll definitely let you know. I'll be upgrading my own platform over the weekend and re-organizing its blogged content, so after I clear that hurdle I can give you an update. It may be 2-3 weeks, realistically, but I wanted to ask you now.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 03:23 PM
1

Hi guys, do you have any interest in the following? Education issues? An author submitting a piece that has already been published by another platform and all parties are OK with it? Thanks for your work!
/r/MensRights18/10/18 10:33 PM
3

Just in case anyone forgot what it was like when he went there last time - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iARHCxAMAO0 A longer vid about the resistance to men's issues groups / events in Canada - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GEm8XaV8rY
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:50 PM
3

Yes - through the criminal justice system.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 07:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter