TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TracyMorganFreeman Archive

View 51 posts and 15,869 comments by TracyMorganFreeman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
473

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:16 AM
216

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights08/06/12 08:13 AM
137

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights25/11/12 03:01 AM
129

HealthTracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:50 PM
83

WBBTracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:59 PM
79

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights06/05/13 03:32 PM
56

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:37 PM
50

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:08 AM
43

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights31/01/13 09:57 PM
31

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:32 AM
27

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:28 AM
27

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:14 AM
26

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights22/04/12 08:02 PM
26

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:58 AM
25

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights02/04/12 06:21 AM
24

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights11/01/12 09:55 AM
21

FeminismTracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:02 PM
21

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:22 PM
21

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights03/09/12 07:06 AM
18

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:45 AM
17

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights13/06/12 05:14 AM
16

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:54 PM
15

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:29 AM
15

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:44 AM
13

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:36 PM
11

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:25 AM
11

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:18 PM
11

Raising AwarenessTracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:00 PM
10

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:42 AM
8

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights19/02/12 02:19 AM
8

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights21/01/12 12:09 AM
7

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights30/05/14 01:05 AM
7

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:37 PM
6

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights18/05/12 05:09 AM
5

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights20/04/12 12:35 AM
5

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights02/05/12 09:56 PM
5

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:37 AM
4

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:50 AM
3

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:32 AM
3

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights02/05/12 11:07 PM
3

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:07 AM
2

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights16/06/12 04:22 PM
2

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:44 AM
2

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:30 AM
2

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights18/03/12 11:53 PM
2

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:43 AM
1

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:05 AM
0

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:38 AM
0

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights15/06/12 08:28 PM
0

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights03/05/12 09:14 PM
0

TracyMorganFreeman/r/MensRights01/03/12 10:17 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 15,869 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

True. It would be like saying single wine moms having a girls night is because they're losers who can't keep a man. Sometimes you just don't want the hassle of being in a romantic relationship.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:54 PM
114

Porn and video games are the symptom, not the cause. If men were able to secure meaningful relationships like, they wouldn't check out of society as much.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 04:34 PM
9

What is she doing letting you or her husband, supposed rapists, be anywhere near her then?
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:30 AM
4

The problem is she read "men struggle more in these arenas than women" as "women face no struggles at all/their struggles don't matter". She refused or neglected to see things through any other lens their her own experience. This is largely a human failing, but feminism has weaponized it.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:29 AM
18

Feminist theory claims misandry is due to patriarchy, as is benevolent sexism towards women. Of course this just makes feminist political advocacy patriarchy 2.0. It's a classic gaslighting scenario.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 07:27 AM
3

It's more they know whether it's bullshit or not they benefit from it being perceived as true, and they don't want to give up that privilege.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 06:47 PM
1

How is he a right wing ideologue now specifically?
/r/MensRights26/10/23 07:14 PM
1

Women want to be challenged like any other person, and young women see no other challenge except in relationships, plus there's plenty of simps that they think is the norm and boring.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 08:02 PM
5

"Equality isn't a zero sum game, you shouldn't oppose feminism" "Hey, any resources for men means fewer resources for women!"
/r/MensRights22/10/23 07:16 PM
1

Most women who are either unaware of them or have been convinced by feminism they're self inflicted.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 07:15 PM
18

"Misattributed" is a cozy word for fraud.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:37 AM
11

To be fair, there's selection bias here. The kinds of men who have the reason most to suspect infidelity are the ones most prone to seek a paternity test.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:36 AM
2

It's whatever is most advantageous to the person making the assessment.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 06:03 AM
1

It will never be enough. People who say that think the onus is on men to solve their problems. If you're unwilling to stand up for yourself, don't be surprised when men won't.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 05:13 AM
21

Yes. Backfiring is when you support or do something intentionally and it doesn't result in what you intended or expected.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 02:05 AM
8

Most women are fully supportive of the current divorce laws, and by a staggering coincidence comprise 70 to 90% of those who initiate divorce.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 02:04 AM
1

Murdering women and children is close.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:43 AM
2

If it wasn't for double standards, feminists wouldn't have any.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:42 AM
3

"Look at these losers trying to hold onto their youth by...having...a decent metabolism? Healthy red blood cell production? Remain sexually active with their partner?
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:41 AM
6

It is quietly starting to lose favor in the US.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:38 PM
1

I think their hate/appreciation of men is entirely informed by how useful they are. Autistic men are more likely to focus on themselves, or be oblivious to others at least.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 04:27 PM
6

"Yeah but those aren't real feminists"
/r/MensRights11/10/23 03:43 PM
21

"Accountability is oppression"~Feminists I recall in college I had joined the local feminist club, wanting to give the benefit of the doubt that terminally online feminists I typically encountered weren't representative, or perhaps in my ego thought I could convince them to change their mind on some things, or at least get them to think about things they hadn't considered. When they talked about having a wage gap bake sale, complete with charging men and women differently based on the wage gap, …
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:20 PM
9

I think you don't misunderstand what an absolute is.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 05:29 AM
57

"Have you tried not being creepy? The only reason you would fear that if deep down you knew you were creepy"
/r/MensRights09/10/23 05:23 AM
2

It's also possible they're being liberal with the definition of "tech" in their assessment too.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 01:22 AM
2

"Tech" layoffs include scaling back HR and marketing of tech firms, and those are where a lot of women in tech can be found.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:22 AM
6

Wouldn't it be speaking Hindi?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:50 PM
1

Who is defending the fair? Why should it be defended?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:49 PM
2

Identity politics tends to backfire eventually.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:48 PM
16

The single largest obstacle to helping men that we can change is feminism's deathgrip on the public perception of who is struggling and why and what struggles matter most. It was feminists who had the law changed in the 1860s to give women default custody of children, not paternalistic bias. It was feminism who got DV redefined through the Duluth model, creating primary aggressor laws that don't see women are violent, not paternalistic bias that women can't be violent or are not a threat. It was…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:14 PM
9

At what point are the actions of feminists actually reflective of feminism to you?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:51 PM
2

The better question is why weren't you from the beginning? Because institutional feminism has been ingrained as part of the cultural zeitgeist
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:50 PM
13

The feminists that want equality are not the ones shaping theory and law in the name of feminism. There have been feminists that were part of the crowd that tried to and were basically ex communicated(e.g. Karen DeCrow, Warren Farrell)
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:48 PM
16

Feminists in power are the ones who represent feminism in earnest. Feminist theory and feminist advocacy in the law show a disinterest in equality. An insistence on your preferred form of feminism which isn't representative of the institution of feminism is what is holding equality back. It gives plausible deniability to the hateful and opportunistic forces that comprise institutional feminism.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:46 PM
18

Women are the majority of the electorate. They are the majority of custodial parents They are the majority of teachers They are the majority of university graduates. They are the minority of the homeless They are the minority of victims of violence. Women are advantaged in many areas, including shaping and selecting the men being put into power.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:43 PM
20

Feminists in power are the ones who shape those theories. They have only ever shaped them from the perspective of women and claim women being the other class are fully capable of knowing the male experience and perspective. Those feminists get a lot of plausible deniability from regular people identifying as feminists as well. Decades of pointing this out have done little to change feminist theory. It's only changed how many identify as feminists, but feminists haven't changed their tune at all.…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:41 PM
3

"He married and had multiple kids with me when I was less attractive and yet treats me even better when I'm more attractive. This must mean he didn't love me at all. " Why do I get the feeling some bitter friend of hers has convinced her that's the reason.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:35 PM
10

It also tells you how much they consider future earning power. They just see the man as what they make in the moment.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:18 PM
116

Girl math: thinking you can cherry pick statistical artifacts about men and feel intellectually and/or morally superior.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 12:27 AM
1

Not when they don't listen to men's perspectives. Feminism is equality solely from the woman's perspective. Only men who agree with that perspective are included.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:14 PM
2

Ah yes the outlier that literally led to informing the definition of rape. It doesn't matter what most feminists think. What matters is what most feminists in power do.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:13 PM
1

Feminists aren't trying to tie them down. They're trying to reinforce men's and tear down women's but only the obligations of the latter.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 09:12 PM
2

To feminists the only valid perspective of men is that which confirms their biases.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 02:47 AM
1

​ The irony is as thick as the skulls who formulated this campaign.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 10:50 PM
1

What law would that be?
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:52 AM
5

Feminists and trad-cons name a more iconic duo.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 04:23 PM
3

Morality isn't subjective. People just disagree on which objective framework of morality to adhere.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:02 AM
1

Meanwhile, most beef is from steers. I'm sure they're okay with the slaughter of castrated males.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 01:40 PM
7

That level of reasoning is about as solid as "women are the ones giving birth to and raising murderers".
/r/MensRights24/09/23 01:17 PM
3

So she believes in fairy tales.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 06:13 PM
2

Virtue is hard. Virtue signaling is easy, and often politically/financially lucrative.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 05:48 AM
1

Somebody has to, and portraying women as dumb is considered sexist.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:41 AM
1

Women are the majority of the electorate. They're the overwhelming majority of K-12 teachers and custodial parents. Women are the ones shaping and selecting the men that are put into power.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 09:58 AM
1

Which of course is why we're seeing young men getting vasectomies at the same rate young women are getting tubal ligation-because doctors equally bias against sterilization.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 04:02 PM
2

Yeah the spread of men being told to get vasectomies after the Dobbs decision didn't happen apparently.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:29 AM
8

The difference is that abusive men aren't encouraged to be abusive.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:22 PM
15

Men's value has always been in relation to what they can do for others. They aren't treated as human beings; they are nothing more than human doings.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:21 PM
7

"Why can't I find a high value man?!" "Well, women made it harder to become one and increased the pool of women going for such men. You reduced the supply and increased demand. " "Of course! It's the cisheterocapitalist patriarchal hegemony!"
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:20 PM
2

There's nothing wrong for marrying someone for your reasons-provided you enter into the marriage in good faith and meet their expectations for marrying you as well. Somehow I doubt that is the case for this woman.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 06:18 PM
1

As someone who is all 3, that's not enough for a lot of women too. I think the very deluge of options women have leads then to think something better is always around the corner.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:55 PM
5

Should ask her what exact hill she thinks that is.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:34 PM
3

Men's greatest weakness is their facade of strength; women's greatest strength is their facade of weakness. ~Warren Farrell. Feminism exploits both of these.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 05:09 PM
3

Some studies have shown dressing ostentatiously may counterintuitively reduce the chance of being raped, as you now have more eyes on you and also convey confidence.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:21 PM
8

You are not responsible for becoming a victim; you are responsible for managing the risks of becoming a victim.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:19 PM
30

"A serial killer that is at large but somehow leaves clues to his guilt in their Instagram continues to evade police, but not my besties' watchful eye" ~her logic
/r/MensRights11/09/23 06:37 AM
8

"Why can't I find a decent man?" "Well for starters you don't even bother to give any kind of feedback to men who fall short and just expect decent ones to fall into your lap"
/r/MensRights03/09/23 05:33 PM
6

Patriarchy is defined unfalsifably. The same gender roles are found in matriarchal societies? Doesn't count! The same rules and restrictions on women and men(patriarchy hurts men too!) done by women? That's still patriarchy! Patriarchy is just a bogeyman moving goalpost that ultimately boils down to "things feminists don't like" and named it after men.
/r/MensRights03/09/23 12:38 AM
3

The right to die alone and cast aside by society. Women aren't cast aside. Any woman who dies alone did so by actively separating herself from society.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 04:13 AM
2

He didn't destroy unions. Unions were on the decline well before him. He destroyed the airline workers union, but that's because they violated their contract. Tax revenue actually went up during Reagan, it's just spending was increased more. The rich paid a larger share of the total tax burden after Reagan than before. He didn't mishandle the aids epidemic on purpose. That's a myth. He played both sides to keep his base happy, but actually increased funding for AIDs research and support but was …
/r/MensRights25/08/23 05:14 PM
1

Not really. Most of it was done before Reagan and people just don't look any further back, or was done independent of him like the legislature. Reagan has been out of office for a while, and no other legislature has done anything about it either.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 05:10 PM
107

Focusing on women to protect them from their own agency? It's funny how feminism never wants to address that part of "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:54 AM
159

In some states, like California, cheating doesn't disqualify you from being entitled to alimony.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:47 AM
3

10 and 11% are pretty damn close. Do you have a link to this survey?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:35 AM
-9

Do they? Also whom are you saying they cheat more than? Married men? Single women?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 04:06 AM
14

Said the woman. What has Nikki Haley done lately?
/r/MensRights25/08/23 12:24 AM
9

I’m not particularly surprised that women make up the majority of the electorate seeing as more men state they have no political affiliation than women indicating they’d be less concerned about the vote No as in statistically adult women outnumber adult men >This is built on the stereotype of women as carers that is a falsehood and should be combated so men aren’t discriminated within these fields The choices women make in how they structure their lives and careers say otherwise; in more "equal"…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:54 AM
17

Except women have been the majority of the electorate for over a century now. They're also the majority of custodial parents and teachers. Women by and large are the ones shaping men during their formative years and putting them into those positions of power. Which raises serious questions about the relevance of the sex of those in power, and instead the focus on for whom that power is primarily wielded. Further, the gender roles to which you refer(men being protectors/fighters/hunters, women be…
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:32 AM
12

To be more clear, what is it you think the Patriarchy is to which they and you refer?
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:05 AM
1

My point is more that if the actual stated goal is to get more women into politics, it should represent the landscape of women's politics. In reality it's just a cover for shortlisting or insulating from scrutiny certain political views by having the right token attached to it.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 12:25 AM
2

I've seen the claim female judges are less biased before, but when digging into the claim its because they didn't count house arrest as zero jail time. I ran the numbers as if it was and the female judges were far more biased. I wonder if someone similar happened here.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 10:02 PM
2

Which makes it a very feminist movie, blaming everything wrong on the patriarchy while ignoring women's agency, but wanting to keep all the parts that benefit women-and calling that not part of patriarchy. Patriarchy is just the parts of society women don't like, and feminists named it after men to avoid any complicity or accountability.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 07:43 PM
2

Which is why she...joined the Patriarchal real world. A woman joining patriarchal society to realize her desires says a lot about the merit of the idea of patriarchy in the first place.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 07:37 PM
2

It has a pro motherhood message when the opening scene is breaking all the dolls that represent children to be taken care of? The Barbie movie can be summed up as: Women have lots of expectations on them by society having them walk a tightrope-but apparently men don't. This tightrope isn't just constraining to women, but makes it "literally impossible to be a woman". This tightrope actually only exists for people who want to make everyone like and accept them, which by implying the tightrope sho…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 07:36 PM
14

"Not enough women in politics" is just code for "not enough of a specific flavor of progressives in politics". They're not interested in the opinions or agency or conservative women.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 06:49 PM
25

To feminists masculinity is just whatever they want men to do for them. It's a manipulation tactic.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 01:33 AM
1

I'm 6'4 and often forget I'm so tall until I go to the store.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:54 AM
5

The Duluth model continues to be a cancer to society.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 09:10 PM
31

The unfair advantage is increasing the candidate pool. Every transwoman that wins is one fewer trophy for ciswomen. It's never been about fairness. It's always been about opportunism.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:37 PM
5

Because those things aren't due to patriarchy. The same gendered expectations are seen in matriarchal societies. Gender roles are a product more of a pre industrial society. Feminism has corrupted the conversation in the same way throughout: women have choices, men have responsibilities. Feminism is keeping the roles going by obscuring reality exploiting unfalsifiable bogeymen to scare the average person into questioning it.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 05:34 PM
1

Or it's pulling the veil away. Or its critics are gaslighting them.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 01:21 AM
2

Because feminism exploits society's predilection to hold men responsible for everything, even women's decisions.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:50 PM
10

We see that in the military even with segregation.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:05 PM
12

"Inequality in the past was very inconvenient for us. Therefore equality is making things as convenient for us as possible, regardless of its effects on others"
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:04 PM
6

Women are the majority of the electorate, the majority of those making consumer decisions, the majority of teachers, and the majority of custodial parents. It's women who are shaping and choosing those other men.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 06:24 AM
41

"Why do men avoid raising, nurturing or taking care of children?"
/r/MensRights12/08/23 09:46 PM
4

Comedy is derived from conflict and self awareness. You get neither from an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 05:55 PM
5

What's always interesting is these kinds of people spend more time being incredulous to the idea they could be wrong about anything than they do defending their position.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 01:49 AM
7

Stop treating them as disposable.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 03:10 AM
1

Feminism is closer to Marxism than it is Objectivism. Marx was an upper middle class no nothing living off his allowance which he squandered to the point of having children starving to death despite having enough to get by comfortably, who then later latched on to his wealthy capitalist friend Engels. He still saw himself as a common man fighting for the common man and a victim of capitalism. Projection and entitlement at its finest.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:32 PM
3

"Men's greatest weakness is their facade of strength, and women's greatest strength is their facade of weakness" ~William Farrell. Feminism exploits this to a T.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 08:29 PM
56

Or they lash out. A man shunned by his village will burn it down to feel its warmth.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 12:34 AM
2

Get a quote from her shop, then go to a man's shop and get a quote.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 08:36 PM
33

Sounds like both people got what they wanted.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 08:04 AM
10

"Feminists don't hate men. They just named everything they don't like after men." ~GirlWritesWhat
/r/MensRights05/08/23 06:20 AM
5

Feminists aren't protesting that because they don't care. They handwave and pay lip service to any counterfactual to their narrative, which a means to power, not the moral good.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 06:14 AM
7

I guess that makes feminists misogynists then.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 06:12 AM
45

There isn't one, because even movies about masculine identifies or men failing to launch don't shit on women to get the message across.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 02:11 AM
5

So both parties are better off.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:17 AM
2

The Virtue of diversity of talent and experience creating new/better results versus the Virtue signaling of tokenism to shield oneself from scrutiny.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 12:35 AM
29

"I'm fighting the patriarchy that harms these bombing targets too"
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:26 AM
21

Virtue is hard. Virtue signaling is easy.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:25 AM
6

My guess is they're sick of hearing it, but since they don't ban FGM discussions, it seems more likely they don't want to make it seem comparable to FGM
/r/MensRights02/08/23 09:53 PM
4

"It's satire!" "Also it's actually a test!" I haven't seen it but I'm starting to think the movie just feeds into the egos of young women and they expect their dates to do the same.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:00 PM
15

The fact it's socially acceptable is just a layer cake of misandry.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:10 PM
4

The Duluth model is harmful to men and women, considering abused people are more likely to go on to abuse others.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:07 PM
33

They blame that on patriarchy too, despite evidence showing when men do seek help they're either denied or told they're the problem.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:06 PM
10

Misogyny kills and misandry only irritates, and yet men have higher mortality rates for almost every situation or activity that both can participate in. In fact dismissing men's concerns as merely being irritated is just more misandry.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:05 PM
12

Feminism is getting men to fight each other while telling them feminists care about them.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 08:37 PM
6

"Pay attention!" "I am, to a deadline much more important than preachy bullshit that soothes your ego."
/r/MensRights22/07/23 02:32 PM
1

The entire point of being spontaneous is not have a plan. "Spontaneous man has no plan, looking for someone else with same interest" is now something to shit on when you don't share that interest.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 04:33 AM
3

Isn't systemic? The family courts aren't a system? The criminal courts aren't a system? The education system isn't a system?
/r/MensRights20/07/23 12:43 AM
25

"Suitable", meaning well off and attractive. It's still spun as something that is up to men to fix
/r/MensRights19/07/23 09:06 PM
36

"Don't listen to feminism, but also don't listen to the people who have been pointing this out the entire time and how feminism is part of the problem"
/r/MensRights18/07/23 11:50 PM
3

Convincing people they've swallowed a lie that doesn't even pass the sniff test isn't easy. Convincing them of that in face of ridicule from others who have swallowed the same lie isn't either. This is how feminism is more of religion if not a cult than an set of ideas.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 01:42 AM
29

Man this fallacy bingo card filled in quickly.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 07:09 AM
140

How do they know someone's gender? How do they know what gender the accused catcaller thought they were?
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:22 PM
20

Feminists don't hate men, they just named everything they don't like after them ~GirlWritesWhat
/r/MensRights14/07/23 01:44 PM
3

Feminist advocates are not about equality. They are about power. They exploit the general publics ignorance of history to facilitate this.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:11 PM
6

Feminism is just Patriarchy 2.0
/r/MensRights11/07/23 04:58 PM
5

laughs in romantic novel covers
/r/MensRights10/07/23 01:39 AM
49

And the ones with permanent alimony are grandfathered in.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:18 PM
6

At any time in history women could have separated from supposedly patriarchalTM society and brought along a few simpathetic men with them and form their own preferred society. They didn't, which means either A) women weren't as capable as men in a pre industrial society and saw the value men brought to society B) women didn't feel oppressed anymore than men did, at least not enough to form their own society
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:44 PM
6

Suffragettes weren't about equal votes. They only wanted votes for women, and without the then attending responsibility to be subject to the draft. The suffragists were about equal votes for all. Elizabeth Cady Stanton was once quoted complaining that, "15 million inferior black men" got the vote before she did. The racism of the suffragettes and the fact women didn't want to be subject to the draft is what took so long to get suffrage for women. Once women thought they could get the vote withou…
/r/MensRights06/07/23 05:33 PM
4

Feminism has always been about opportunism not equal rights with equal responsibilities, even as early as the first wave.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:37 PM
85

Feminism isn't a coherent movement. It's just an vague idea that people attach their flag to that exploits society's bias in favor of women.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:04 AM
4

There's a gender bias in who is more likely to have their ego soothed if there's a longer line of people hoping to get something from them than for the other gender.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:32 PM
57

Male friends insult each other and don't mean it. Female friends compliment each other and don't mean it.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:31 PM
21

Feminism is one part projection, 1 part special pleading, 2 parts opportunism.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:30 PM
5

Feminists aren't supportive of gay men. They use gay men as a cudgel against what they claim to be the problem: patriarchy and toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 04:44 PM
11

Indy apparently filmed 6 different endings and Kennedy went with the most feminist one.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 01:12 AM
6

Well its the aggregate of about 6 flops.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 12:35 AM
7

Sunk costs, tax write-offs I imagine.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 12:10 AM
41

Disney has already been projected to have lost 900 million from the last half dozen movies they've churned out. Guess they really want to get that third apostrophe.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 04:58 PM
4

To provide a case in point for why people hate being male while having zero self awareness.
/r/MensRights02/07/23 09:52 PM
72

"The institution of marriage(for women) should continue even when that marriage has been dissolved" Also these old spoiled women in Florida seemed to have not read the bill where they're basically grandfathered in.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 05:50 PM
1

Having any gut doesn't equal being obese.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 04:48 AM
17

One of the most common political strategies is just appealing to ideals, without really qualifying terms. Then people can project their own biases onto those keywords like equality or justice and won't really scrutinize what actual policies are being pushed in the name of those words.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 02:27 AM
2

It isn't a conspiracy of it's out in the open.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 12:07 AM
1

As someone who was skinny most of their life until hitting their late 30s, none of those people are skinny. Some are average. I'm 6'4 and was underweight my whole adult life and could not put the weight on until recently. My point about obesity was that similar body positive movements for women are far more diverse, healthy or otherwise.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:29 AM
3

Not one skinny or obese guy in the bunch. There isn't even much variety in height.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 12:24 AM
5

Modern women are often out of touch with what men experience. Autistic people are out of touch with other people's experience. It's unsurprising Autistic women are doubly out of touch. There seems to be a lot of "undiagnosed ladies" who may just be using undiagnosed autism as an excuse for shitty behavior.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 06:07 PM
22

"You think someone would do that? Just go to HR and lie?"
/r/MensRights19/06/23 05:40 PM
22

"Disruptive" is code for "the mere optics of getting complaints makes it seem like we don't take this seriously", so it's easier to just make them go away.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 05:39 PM
8

Keep in mind recent studies have called into question men don't seek help, and points to either they're being denied help or that help is inadequate, possibly due to being geared toward women.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 01:31 PM
2

More like a world increasingly concentrated on the demands of women.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 09:12 PM
34

Of course her attorney would say that. I'm more interested in what the judge or jury says.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 07:27 PM
8

So she did this because of a viral Tiktok post where a husband did this and was considered a jerk. She is apparently not being called a jerk by the same people. So it is very feminist: taking advantage of and blatantly flouting the double standards that are in favor of women.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:22 PM
8

Not being required child support without a positive paternity test is also reversible and safe.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 12:55 AM
8

Yeah two people who are both infertile or sterilized should still use condoms unless they're in a long term committed relationship. The exception to that may be for anal sex, as it comes with more risks.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 12:53 AM
3

The life expectancy gap between men and women was fewer than 2 years in 1920, and that was artificially high given the recency of WW1. They can fuck right off. The gap is likely preventable because of favoring women in every aspect of healthcare.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 05:29 PM
5

Working with feminism is letting feminists define what Men's rights are. This is already what is happening, which would make MRAs working with them giving them plausible deniability. Feminism as an institution is about power, not equality.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 05:27 PM
8

Yeah because everyone knows women weren't insecure at all before those existed.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 05:01 PM
30

Her claim isn't supported by data. It's just normal feminist victim blaming, and infantilizing of women.
/r/MensRights07/06/23 05:58 AM
8

Are you saying it's obvious society doesn't care about men, or that such a claim is an obvious stance to be encounter here?
/r/MensRights06/06/23 11:38 PM
28

"Women attempt more!" Is a common refrain. Here's how I respond to it: 1.1% of women who attempt suicide die from it. 11% of men who attempt suicide die from it. "Men use more lethal methods!" Men and women use strangulation as a method each around 30% of the time. Men die from strangulation as a suicide method 2.5 to 3 times as much as women. "Men are more likely to use guns! It's not a men's issue it's a masculinity issue with guns. Just have more gun control" South Korea has a higher suicide …
/r/MensRights06/06/23 10:57 PM
6

My point is that roles will take shape in a relationship or there is no relationship. Bemoaning what those roles are labeled is irrelevant. The issue at hand is the hypocritical standard society has for these preferences for roles in one's partner. You're a newly created account today. Please go troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 02:41 AM
10

Traditional or reverse? Roles will happen in a relationship one way or another.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 02:21 AM
6

The fight for women's rights wasn't limited to the legal avenues. More. Special. Pleading.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 01:30 AM
2

"The French Council of State thinks it is better to maintain a lie"
/r/MensRights04/06/23 11:45 PM
3

Finding out someone was disloyal disrupts that peace. They're basically saying it's better to maintain a lie.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 11:43 PM
3

Patriarchal, which of course is marriage is called "matrimony" and dowries exist. More special pleading.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 11:31 PM
11

You think how each part of the couple characterizes their gendered expectations has nothing to do with mens rights? I guess men expecting women to stay in the kitchen and pop out kids isn't a women's rights issue then.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:25 PM
15

Not as long as alimony and custody laws are still shaped by that hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 10:06 PM
30

Yeah the complete lack of self awareness on her part if the roles were flipped, and her expecting men to fill the traditional role is why.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 09:02 PM
3

If the issue is not being taken seriously because of lies from another group, then addressing that group's propensity to lie is addressing the issue.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:54 PM
5

Actually they have been advocating and keep running headfirst into the feminist propaganda machine.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:53 PM
4

You can be a fundamentalist Christian and care about gays too. You just pity that they're going to hell. Feminists in practice only care about men insofar they are useful to feminism.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:51 PM
3

This person like many feminists assumes the only way to address women's issues is to be pro feminist. They then take the MRA anti feminist stance as anti woman.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:50 PM
14

Sounds like she never learned the value of men in her life, or just takes it for granted.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 03:31 PM
2

I've always had trouble with this argument. Either feminism is a coherent set of ideas or it isn't. If it's true there is no one movement, then you can't reliably credit something to feminism. It also distracts from the fact feminism in earnest still has central tenets, and it doesn't matter what the average or most or regular person who identifies as a feminist thinks, but what feminists in power do. For example when feminist lawyer and former President of NOW Karen DeCrow stated women with the…
/r/MensRights01/06/23 12:15 AM
4

It says nothing about feminist theory sure, but does say something about the movement. It's kind of like the difference between a religion and its adherents. It may not matter what the religion actually says of bad things are done in its name by its genuine adherents.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 11:12 PM
6

You can ask questions in good faith and engage in debate. I've studied feminist history and advocacy quite a bit and I've found most feminists are pretty ignorant of the movement.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 10:47 PM
45

Well duh. Recruiters have metrics for success and white men aren't worth many points.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:52 PM
2

They compared mothers of boys with GID to mothers of boys without it.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 10:44 PM
2

Sex linked applies to the paternal lineage, not maternal.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 10:41 PM
1

We would see the same incidence in their daughters then, or a disparity between sons and daughters of fathers with BPD.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 10:41 PM
43

Jane Fonda continues to be an insufferable, bloated, ghoul. Jane Fonda starred in The China Syndrome, which was a disaster thriller surrounding an accident at a nuclear power plant. By sheer bad luck the 3 Mile Island incident occured 10 days after its release, and she...went across the country promoting her movie as if it were a documentary to the dangers of nuclear power. She fueled the hysteria surrounding an accident which killed no one and exposed people in the surrounding area to the equiv…
/r/MensRights29/05/23 06:53 PM
6

That would count as rape if in the anus, but not mouth. Mouth penetration requires a "sex organ", but then only one of the two sex organs penetrates. Interestingly using a foreign object on the vagina is rape, but not on the penis, either penetrating the urethra/vas deferens nor forcibly enveloping it.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 12:56 AM
10

The FBI definition does both: it says intercourse without consent, then adds the caveat to be rape it requires penetration on the part of the offender. The CDC just catalogues the federal definition. Some CDC studies have looked at forced envelopment separately.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 11:31 PM
1

They sound far safer than being in the cold water when you can't swim.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 03:50 PM
4

Lower survival rates, like in the water? Well duh men are stronger swimmers. What percentage of each in the manifest went into lifeboats?
/r/MensRights27/05/23 11:55 PM
4

I wonder how much of that preference is informed by the myth it's more sanitary. Also is this study limited to the US?
/r/MensRights27/05/23 09:27 PM
8

Men fear ridicule because it usually is followed by violence or loss of one's livelihood.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 08:08 PM
3

Men dying more, women most affected.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 02:29 AM
2

his red flag behaviour was overlooked institutionally Damn institutions of due process and needing evidence are oppressive!
/r/MensRights26/05/23 10:26 PM
1

I think it depends greatly on the game and whatever culture its community has; shooters MOBAs tend to pretty toxic. It's also a factor that your guild mates see you as part of a team with a shared goal. Women who see harassment likely aren't getting it from their formal teammates but strangers or opponents.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 08:26 PM
37

Eventually you'll have to know the entire park schedule, and there's little to no room for an impromptu jog
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:59 AM
129

You can have 3 to 4am.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:58 AM
5

Just use the girls bathroom, knocking before entering and maybe announcing you're coming in. They can't deny you the use of a bathroom
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:39 AM
26

You haven't been in many women's bathrooms then.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 04:38 AM
4

Alright so expecting marriage to prove love is emotional blackmail.
/r/MensRights25/05/23 07:34 PM
8

"OH that's in the White House".
/r/MensRights24/05/23 05:11 AM
9

The irony of a nepobaby writer bemoaning success not due to merit but privilege.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 04:56 AM
5

No, some women will want to join and leverage the sex ratio disparity to their advantage.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 04:05 AM
4

Because it's a threat to their power.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 07:15 PM
11

There are a plethora of options so people have an inflated sense of worth.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 03:49 PM
2

The loudest defenders of socialism don't understand what socialism is. Of course the loudest opponents of it tend not to either, reinforcing the farmer's conviction.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 12:21 AM
3

She's basically dismissing the idea men are people that when pushed hard enough resort to violence.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 08:34 PM
2

Men learn quickly no one will believe them, and that they're far more likely to be held accountable for their actions.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:38 AM
10

"Thanks for letting me know I dodged the bullet of dating someone who takes the word of strangers over even hearing someone out."
/r/MensRights20/05/23 04:36 AM
1

Time to make an app to see if wives are making as much money for the household as the husband too then.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 08:45 PM
7

"So if they could do anything they set their mind to, why were all companies run by white men?"
/r/MensRights14/05/23 03:02 PM
31

Your chief diversity officer made an explicit claim that POC and women are better leaders? Sounds like a hostile work environment. Lawyer up.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 05:12 AM
11

Scotland also defines rape as something that can only happen by someone with a penis. So if a biological male identifies as a woman, goes to an SNP meeting/rally, and accuses them of rape, will they change their tune?
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:15 AM
1

Oy. You know I'm not a feminist troll, right? Is a veteran of this sub breaking your precious circlejerk really that unnerving that you cloister up?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:38 AM
-5

A dry well of obstinance and ignorance. This sub really has gone downhill.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:36 AM
-1

There's a profound difference between "men don't need rights" and "there aren't any rights for me that need to be fought for". You are conflating them.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:19 AM
-9

Keyword "tend"
/r/MensRights08/05/23 10:48 AM
-8

Well they tend to say they don't need a men's rights movement, because they assume there aren't any rights men need to fight for.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 06:28 AM
4

Because sales is about convincing the customer to buy your product. Financial advising has the service already bought by the customer, and now the quality of the service is up to the employee's talents and understanding.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:15 AM
3

You accused me of having hatred for women's rights, or at least how you wrote your response implied so.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 08:49 AM
6

Well you need a history lesson then, since Catherine Norton and her feminist colleagues are the originators of the Tender Years Doctrine which formalized mothers getting custody preference in divorces, and this was in the mid 1800s. Feminists since then have long undermined any attempt to reform it by lying to the public, claiming it will force women to stay in abusive relationships, even when the proposed bills explicitly says joint custody is the rebuttable presumption and doesn't apply if a p…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 08:27 AM
8

Hardly. I'm not claiming what people do or should value. Do you have something other than typical feminist projection?
/r/MensRights05/05/23 08:24 AM
7

No, having roles in a relationship is in fact innocent, and often necessary. Your actual objection is people having their roles prescribed to them instead of choosing them. That or you don't think women choosing said roles is legitimate, which would mean you don't actually believe in female agency. As for my hatred of those things, you're going to need something beyond accusations, and drum up some evidence or argument to substantiate it.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 08:23 AM
8

Wanting a partner doesn't mean at any cost. You seem to think women making decisions based in their calculus is empowerment, but men doing so is immature and toxic.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:38 AM
9

Well the justice system in this case is a product of feminist lobbying.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:38 AM
5

I believe you aren't the arbiter for what makes other people happy, so stop trying to speak for them.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:37 AM
3

I'm sure when a guy reacts like that to her rejection him she thinks it's perfectly reasonable too.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:23 AM
1

Can't feel pain if you die prematurely.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:10 AM
10

No, women under 35 who are married are more likely to report they are happy than unmarried women.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:08 AM
8

I tire of people rolling their eyes at stereotypes instead of addressing the how the justice system incentivizes such behavior.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:06 AM
1

I cynically think they want to leverage the pain for something. Many young people think "if X then Y", and if you don't agree with Y, then they'll say you're denying X.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 12:26 AM
1

"Entire island of women who don't allow men in complain to mainland of problems for men to solve"
/r/MensRights05/05/23 12:23 AM
14

Woosh. You are imputing your own values onto others, and deciding what is good or bad for them.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 09:36 PM
10

You care about men's health but your first instinct is to victim blame. Not within your consideration is the possibility that gaming and porn are a symptom of the problem, with society no longer valuing most men, so men are checking out.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 08:12 PM
16

You don't decide what others value.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 08:10 PM
22

Achieving nothing? No, they're achieving nothing *useful to women*.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 06:34 PM
12

Except single women aren't happier than married or divorced women. Divorced women have an alimony and child support passive income attached to them now.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 06:33 PM
1

So women were underrepresented as victims even then.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:51 AM
2

"A lot of..." is little more than handwaving.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:16 AM
5

Okay. If men were conscripted for centuries and were within a rounding error 100% of military deaths, time to start doing the same and kill hundreds of millions of women. For equality. This is why equality without qualification is meaningless, and equality of outcome applied consistently is horrible. Edit: oh you're a day old account. Troll alert.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:49 AM
1

With or without the Hayden Rider? With its just "equality for me, not for thee", which is exactly why it didn't make it and shouldn't.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:45 AM
8

That doesn't follow.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:44 AM
15

It's neither more or less wrong than sending an all male unit. Unless one is due to merit and the other is due to actively selecting outside of merit.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:38 AM
6

Yeah what evidence is there they would be more capable? You could also fatten the astronauts up prior to launch, which will save on weight on net, and men have a bigger frame for that. The author is clearly not well versed in engineering or creative thinking. They went searching for a headline and blase justification for it.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:37 AM
18

Except that's based on averages. You can select a mixed crew based on size and needed specialties. Men may have higher calorie needs, but will also be less prone to musculoskeletal injuries, and if they are taller and stronger, will need fewer transportation gear to assist in moving or building anything. Also every woman will need a years worth of birth control or hygiene products-or be menopausal. Food is not the only consideration for weight, and volume is just as much of a constraint is as we…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 02:33 AM
19

>The feminist theory underlying the Duluth Model is that men use violence within relationships to exercise power and control >One part of this model is the men's behaviour change program 'Creating a Process of Change for Men who Batter' [also known as the Duluth Curriculum]. The Duluth Curriculum is the most common batterer intervention program used in the United States. Even more hilarious is how the Duluth mode can't explain DV in homosexual relationships.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 01:03 AM
51

The Duluth model literally tries to rationalize female perpetrated DV actually.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 10:58 PM
28

Needs trump those of the parents? Now do infant circumcision. The hospital is just using whatever buffet options of justification to limit their own culpability.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:49 AM
6

At this point anything that makes women uncomfortable is abuse to them. Gynocentrism at its finest.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 08:46 PM
64

More accurately they simply think women don't make false accusations, and they assume all MRAs are men.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:24 PM
8

Demagoguery is a cottage industry for feminism.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:25 AM
11

People shouldn't be charged with rape unless they deliberately did so. Oh wait the investigation and trial process is what is there to demonstrate that. Same applies to false accusations.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 07:38 PM
14

As usual they only look at female victims of male perpetrated violence and assume they're all victims due to misogyny. Feminism continues to be logically and morally bankrupt.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 04:42 PM
2

To be fair humanoids are by definition bipedal.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:38 PM
8

They are actually. Duluth model for DV==>the gender neutral Family Violence Prevention Act being replaced with the Violence Against Women Act. It doesn't matter what the average feminist thinks. What matters is what the average feminist with influence thinks, and radical feminists have outsized influence.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:36 PM
6

You seem unaware of the Duluth model then.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:34 PM
3

It does if you're demonizing men and creating kangaroo courts to prosecute them. And obscuring the majority of the victims does harm them.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:34 PM
10

The industry term for such studies is a fishing expedition.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:32 PM
9

I'd be curious how many of those are the result of divorce.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 07:40 PM
7

When women hate men they kill them as children, or have the power of the state oppress/kill them through false accusations.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 07:40 PM
2

Rodgers was likely an incel, but the thing people forget about him is he killed more men than women, and during his escape attempt while at an intersection pointed his gun at a female cyclist and then decided not to shoot her. He didn't set out to just kill women, but the sorority members who had rebuffed him and the men who were successful with those members. He didn't hate women. He hated the men and women in college culture that he was not good at navigating and lashed out at its participants…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:29 AM
3

If there are no men, then there is no inequality between men and women, so they're wrong there.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:25 AM
12

40% of spousal homicide victims are men killed by their wives. Stats like that are suppressed by feminist lobbying. Feminists are empowering people to kill men by obscuring the guilty parties from scrutiny.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:24 AM
1

Weird tact given those terms are usually used by detractors of MRAs. Also they still keep conflating MRAs, TRPers, MGTOW as if they're all the same. If the FBI knew what they were doing these would jot be the terms to flag.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 01:22 AM
7

Haven't read the article yet, but I'm guessing the over/under on "emotional labor" is 1.5
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:52 PM
3

Some animals are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:13 PM
5

Also "when we remove a body part, the chances of complications with that body part go down, so even if its without consent, it's for medical reasons", but we don't apply that logic to any part of a woman or infant girl.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:21 AM
1

Because they sometimes work and cost nothing. It's the same for internet spam and catcalling.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 05:52 PM
1

Because the reason for the segregation is opportunism, with inconsistent justification.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 11:08 PM
6

Gaslighting and poisoning the well. That along with special pleading is all these activists have.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 05:34 AM
8

Spain continues to give reasons for men to never go there or leave as soon as practicable.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 05:33 AM
15

"As a person who identifies as a lady myself, I was trying to establish solidarity"
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:20 AM
7

"I was under the impression this job required one to be able to make decisions under pressure, not succumb to micropressure.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:20 AM
10

Toxic masculinity is just code for when men aren't useful to women.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 08:11 PM
1

I'm not sure about 100%. Plenty of unnecessary surgery on infants with ambiguous genitalia is done on female instants too.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 04:30 PM
3

More people are killed by knives than by AR15s in the US.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 04:28 PM
2

This is based in the idea that you're more or less of a victim based on how different from you your victimizer is. Black people in the US are despite being only 13% of the population the majority of victims of murder and the majority of murderers. The fact black people kill each other at a rate 3 to 5 times the rate of white people is a national tragedy, but according to their logic wouldn't be a racial issue.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 11:02 PM
13

She should stop femsplaining how to deal with detractors. It implies women don't know how to already.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 06:31 PM
1

I assume you mean Haber, but making food less scarce=/=making it not scarce. >I may not have the answer but I would like to be well intended toward solving the problem. Intentions don't determine results, and blindly following intentions opens one up to corruption and ignoring unintended consequences.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 11:01 AM
1

>That's is a capitalistic issue. Okay I was with you until this part.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:33 AM
1

No by definition if something is scarce then there isn't enough for every person to have, so it can't be a human right. Whether that thing can eventually no longer be scarce doesn't mean you can put the cart before the horse and have it treated as one beforehand.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:31 AM
1

You can't have something that is scarce be a human right.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:57 AM
3

primarily by men Welp, someone drank the feminist kool-aid in ignoring how power works so women have no accountability.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:30 AM
2

Who was the majority of the electorate in 1975?
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:29 AM
1

Unless the disparities men primarily face aren't in those categories. And no, having the same results without the same inputs will definitely benefit women more than men, because men are the ones who will be paying for it, and those kinds of systems always have men putting in more than they get out than women You're only asking to not solve the biggest issues men face while deepening the disparity on accountability.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 09:26 AM
1

There is nothing preventing men from being the one funding all of that socialism and women primarily benefiting from it. Women are already as a group net tax recipients and men net taxpayers.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:50 AM
4

The Hayden Rider. Many refused to approve the ERA without an explicit exception when unequal treatment benefited women: "The provisions ofthis article shall not be construed to impair any rights, benefits, orexemptions now or hereafter conferred by law upon persons of the femalesex."
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:48 AM
1

As a fast walker, time for malicious compliance for those who block my path.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:48 PM
2

Feminists hate women with agency.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:22 AM
8

For some people, diversity or inclusion just means fewer cis/white men. For them they aren't interested in equality. It's a means to power for them.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 12:08 AM
5

Because they only want the aggressive parts that benefit them. Toxic masculinity is just code for "masculinity that doesn't serve my priorities". It's trying to shame men for not being more accommodating to women, while victim blaming any suffering men face.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 05:43 PM
2

Ah poisoning the well. The classic rhetorical tactic for the lazy to take advantage of the uninitiated.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:34 PM
161

Just ask why they're assuming your gender
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:26 PM
11

"She can get in line with the rest of the men"
/r/MensRights22/03/23 02:24 PM
5

Feminism has long thought accountability of standards of any kind for women is oppression.
/r/MensRights22/03/23 06:32 AM
20

How you dress and act is like being a billboard. You might attract your target audience, but you'll also have everyone else in view as well.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 10:17 PM
32

It's not mine. It's a quote of Warren Farrell, author of The Myth of Male Power. He used to work for NOW until he was excommunicated from the sisterhood for saying the quiet part out loud.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 03:06 AM
93

Men's greatest weakness is their facade of strength. Women's greatest strength is their facade of weakness.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 12:43 AM
16

Single and independent doesn't sound like an insult to me.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 12:19 AM
17

"OH you disagree with me? That's why you can't get laid". It's narcissistic to boot, thinking all women think like them.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 12:19 AM
1

*His* property.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 05:53 PM
129

It's just another gaslighting tactic, which in addition to being narcissistic becomes self fulfilling, as it too elicits anger.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:22 PM
1

Lesbians I suspect should be in an uproar
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:30 AM
0

Ask them why young women go for older men then.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 04:15 PM
5

It's the new "don't tell boys not to cry" while drinking from a "Male Tears" mug. It's just more evasion and gaslighting.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 06:47 AM
1

Apparently it never occurred to those women to lobby for it themselves. Even if he only lobbied for himself, he doesn't have a obligation to do it for anyone else. Just forward the email chain of him lobbying for everyone. If they get pissy still just remind them who so far advocated for women to have their titles being shown and who still hasn't, so who is the real misogynist. In reality this person is likely just throwing the accusation to shame him into doing her work for her.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:57 PM
10

Think? It's demonstrably true, from specialized programs to grading bias to disciplinary standards.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 08:53 AM
4

The industry term is controlled opposition
/r/MensRights10/03/23 10:51 PM
-6

Ugh there is some ignorant biology on sex determination in this article.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 06:23 PM
5

Women and children were 90% who had to flee the Titanic to life boats too.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:46 PM
45

Well one is publicly and legally held accountable more.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 06:34 AM
64

A simple test of the fact those living through that is still preferable to dying shows how few of them commit suicide. It's really born from not caring at all about men's suffering, and finding any amount of women's suffering intolerable.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:35 PM
2

Every government tax. Men have longer commutes, fuel tax Men have higher incomes, income tax. And on and on. Health insurance as well. Even after accounting for natal care more is spent on women's health than men's.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 07:50 PM
7

Every aspect of society focuses on the safety and provision of women, up to and including not holding women accountable for their mistakes or transgressions. Women getting imprisoned for crime? She's been separated from her children! Go easy on her, or just straight don't give her a prison sentence. Woman homeless? Special shelters for them that exclude men-who are the majority of the homeless. Women 60% of those graduating college? A good start, but not enough is being done for women! Men strug…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:51 PM
10

You want a source for women being the majority of the electorate? https://luceperformancegroup.com/Women-Consumers-Control-85-percent-Of-Spending-Power___635774267810750931_blog.htm#:~:text=85%25%20of%20all%20consumer%20purchases,men%20are%20purchased%20by%20women. Spoiler: women spending men's money means the pay gap runs the opposite way if anything. Also as a group men are net taxpayers and women net tax recipients.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:45 PM
13

We literally hear about women's problems everyday. We literally see men's problems being dismissed everyday, even on the special day. Special days are political theater and little else.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:39 PM
12

That wasn't a joke. You're conflating what is led or built by men with what is controlled by men. Society has long prioritized the protection and provision of women. A focus on what men did that women didn't is just a distraction to this, and ignores all of the duties imposed on men with it. It then calls for equality for one for the good parts, none of that icky accountability, and politicians are willing to appease the majority to get into power.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:37 PM
6

I'll acknowledge international women's day if they shut up about their problems the rest of the year, just like they deny or dismiss Men's problems everyday.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:34 PM
5

You don't need a special day for that.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:33 PM
9

Women are the majority of the electorate. Women make 80% of consumer decisions. "More equal" my ass. They're just more of what men had but men are retaining all the responsibility.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:33 PM
14

No, it's a woman's world, with a handful of men put in charge by women to give women plausible deniability.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:31 PM
67

Yeah. Everyday men are murdered more than women. Everyday men are assaulted publicly and privately more than women. Everyday men kill themselves more than women. Everyday men lose more of their lives or livelihoods to the courts than women. Everyday homeless men are denied entry to shelters more than homeless women. The list goes on.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:30 PM
36

Well dealing with the world's shit thanklessly seems appropriate.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:27 PM
34

>You think women should end a relationship with nothing. Never said that. >See how much work he could have done without somone caring for his children. No, you do the math. No handwaving, no shifting the burden of proof. You just as easily handwave things and ask how much could he have made if he was single with no children. >The law in most jurisdictions doesn’t agree - hence the outcome. Call me when have something that graduates beyond strawmen and special pleading.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 02:02 AM
57

>What would she pay it with? I don't know, maybe...labor? >This doesn’t mean her effort caring for the family had no value. You mean like the value of...free room and board? > Even an au pair you pay their rent, board and an allowance and they don’t do any actual parenting. An au pair is taking care of SOMEONE ELSE'S home and children, not THEIR OWN.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 01:23 AM
53

Now discount her half the rent and utilities she didn't have to pay and see what's left.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 12:45 AM
33

They take men for granted and only see things through their own lens.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 12:45 AM
34

Funny, she didn't have to pay rent did she?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 12:44 AM
9

Well the SLPC was never big on honest or critical reporting.
/r/MensRights07/03/23 06:14 PM
2

You're assuming monogamy, or honest reporting.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 09:01 PM
2

Average male testosterone levels is 300 to 1000 ng/dL, with 5.5 liters of blood. That comes to 16,500 to 55,000 ng. Suffice it to say men and women both are much more than 98.5% testosterone free already.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 01:03 AM
1

11% of men who attempt suicide die from it, compared to 1% of women.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 06:34 PM
1

What's hilarious is women's groups opposed the ERA unless the Hayden rider was attached
/r/MensRights21/02/23 02:53 AM
1

People measure opportunity by either treatment or outcome. It's a weasel term, really
/r/MensRights21/02/23 02:51 AM
18

Equitable accountability. That would hit more broadly while covering this
/r/MensRights21/02/23 02:50 AM
6

"I'm not saying you have small boobs, only that you're acting as someone who would if they did and is overcompensating for it."
/r/MensRights12/02/23 11:36 PM
6

Yeah I can't recall anyone ever saying to a woman online "oh you probably just have small boobs".
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:22 PM
7

*Provides his own actual account of what happened* "But there's plenty of stories."
/r/MensRights08/02/23 02:40 AM
2

There's probably a selection bias of male feminists being with female feminists who don't think too much of men.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 01:13 AM
5

"Arguments are valid or invalid regardless of who present them. Argument from authority is a line of reasoning for people not competent in critical reasoning"
/r/MensRights21/01/23 04:41 AM
5

Is? Always has been.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 02:26 PM
2

So not only is it useless-since accusations aren't evidence, testimony is, but it is also rife for abuse. Savvy politicians get toothless things implemented so they can look good without actually having done anything.
/r/MensRights14/01/23 05:31 PM
9

"It's toxic when men do it, and when women do it it's because men control society"
/r/MensRights12/01/23 05:53 PM
2

Toxicity.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 05:53 PM
21

"Feminism doesn't blame men. They just named everything they hate after them" ~GirlWritesWhat
/r/MensRights12/01/23 05:52 PM
7

Feminism is, at is core, an exercise in women avoiding complicity in shaping society, while demanding women be given more power to shape it. The dismissal of female agency by feminism is just opportunistic gaslighting.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 05:52 PM
14

Assuming can be. Then problem is the data bears out one and not the other.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 12:38 AM
11

Baseless? Go onto a construction site, or any kind of work environment that isn't an air conditioned office or parents basement.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 12:37 AM
15

Your distortion of basic terms definitely has the trappings of a troll.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 12:36 AM
29

Men...have longer legs than women, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of their height. Guh. These "researchers" are desperate.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 12:34 AM
3

Actually grammatical gender is not the same as natural gender.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 09:08 PM
3

[Here you go](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15532739.2013.750222) ​ [Here's another](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-17749-0)
/r/MensRights08/01/23 06:27 PM
1

Oh look, a feminist who instead of taking responsibility for her feelings, imputes malice onto others. It must be Tuesday.
/r/AntiFeminists08/01/23 05:14 AM
4

The reality is it focuses on society not giving a shit when women behave badly. Feminist forums focus on the mere non zero incidence of men behaving badly, or even just not realizing all of women's desires.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 04:52 AM
13

Actually that last part is quite Contentious, and it's often repeated by overplaying the degree of congruence. For example, among monozygotic twins where at least one is trans, only in 30-35% of cases is the other trans as well.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 12:43 AM
1

It's pretty obvious the slope for white and american indian men is higher than that of women. The slope for Black and Hispanic women is higher than that of men, and they're just ignoring the bigger increase.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:11 PM
1

We don't ban people for questioning us.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 08:08 PM
10

It was an all female design team. The bridge was literally celebrated on International Women's Day as such. The "fact checks" are regarding an entire different claim that the entire company was female.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:55 PM
9

Remember the bridge that collapsed that was designed by an all female staff of engineers? They didn't reevaluate shit.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:46 PM
1

What you do is *normalize* the two datasets: what portion of suicide attempts lead to suicide. Do that and you get 11% of male suicide attempts lead to death by suicide, and 1.1% of female attempts do.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 06:15 AM
2

Obviously not randomly, given the caveat "aggressively pursued" which seems ill defined and inconsistent.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:39 PM
1

I see no such study. I see feminist blogs and writers making dubious claims from statistical artifacts.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:38 PM
2

Your link for women being punished for accusations of abuse is a) an isolated incident, b) she represented herself several times, and c) the judge was found to have ruled incorrectly on appeal Your link on how courts fail mothers is basically assuming accusations of abuse are all genuine and not a legal strategy with little risk. You either have a huge biased blindspot in reading this or a troll.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:22 PM
1

The point is "pushing aggressively" has definitional problems, as well as women not having to push aggressively for the same level of custody. It's all smoke and mirrors to hide the reality that there is a bias against men in the courts, and you're just operating the smoke machine. The fact you say >2000 is interesting since that isn't nailing down the exact figure, and usually for social studies 10K or 15K is considered a representative sample. So you have a non representative sample of a group…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:08 PM
2

Oh they asked some dads in MA who asked for custody and "pushed aggressively for it". Hello selection bias, with a dash of definitional questions.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 03:07 AM
2

"I decide the conditions for my investment in people, not you. Expecting me to pay for your decisions without my consent or under false pretenses is you being selfish."
/r/MensRights07/12/22 05:47 PM
20

Which isn't actually equality, but infantilization.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 04:40 PM
14

It only stops them from coming forward because feminists lie about the statistics to make it seek like the courts are biased against believing victims.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 10:40 PM
0

Notably women on average score lower than men on the LSAT. They get higher GPAs, but then GPA is more subject to grading bias.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 06:46 PM
1

Now break the numbers down by race and see how they change their tune.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 01:52 AM
1

That..is not why they can or can't reproduce. They don't have testes by mutations. Translocation isn't mutation. You have a malinformed understanding of biology, particularly genetics. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 12:58 AM
1

XXY is still male. You literally said lyonization doesn't occur in males because of the Y chromosome. XX males and CAIS are both male. You're just fucking wrong.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:09 PM
1

Defining sex by chromosomes is oversimplified. Sex is the reproductive condition of an organism, so what matters most is...what is used for reproduction. Sex isn't just arbitrary label we attach to organisms.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:07 PM
1

Lyonizarion occurs in people with Klinefelter syndrome XXY too. It is simply where only one X chromosome is expressed in each cell, regardless of the presence or absence of the Y chromosome. Lyonization isn't unique to females. You are very misinformed about this.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:59 PM
1

They don't produce ova and have testes. They're male. Sorry but you're wrong. Biology defines sex by gametes. Gamete production may be due to genetics or environment, with the former having chromosal trends, but the mere presence or absence of the chromosome doesn't define sex. It is the genes typically found on one or the other that does.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:57 PM
1

No, they're males. They just don't have the Hox genes from the Y chromosome, and due to Lyonization are shorter and slighter of build. Chromosomes don't determine sex. Gametes do. Basic biology.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:50 PM
1

CAIS are males. Sex is defined by gametes. That's why humans are anisogamous, oogamous, and gonochoric.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:46 PM
1

They're male, but are not typically masculine looking due to lyonization. Sex isn't based on chromosomes.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:45 PM
1

Not really. CAIS people are considered male through all the history of the medical literature, they have XY chromosomes and SRY gene functioning, they just not have the AR gene functioning. Just because they look like female, doesn’t mean they’re one. No, they have testes and produce sperm. They're male. >People with De La Chapelle Syndrome aka XX-Males are females, firstlybecause this syndrome only occurs in XX embryos (females) because of anabnormal translocation of SRY gene of an Y chromosome…
/r/MensRights26/11/22 10:33 PM
3

Now do child abuse.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 04:08 AM
1

Just remember Kanye and her only lasted a month. She's just an attention where trying to stay relevant instead of doing real work.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 04:06 AM
1

Women have choices. Men have responsibilities.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 12:10 AM
3

There's little to gain politically. She isn't unambiguously sympathetic like a non violent drug offender or a refugee
/r/MensRights20/11/22 02:14 AM
8

Well that's textbook projection. It's adorable how predictable they are.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 08:21 PM
9

It's a federal sentence. She has to serve at least 85% before eligible for parole.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:21 PM
0

It's certainly woke to assume sexism where there isn't.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 05:52 AM
4

The pipeline for perpetrators you say? You mean the increasing number of single mother households? The percent of teachers that are women? Sounds like the pipeline is more of a gauntlet of female perspectives on men during boys formative years.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 12:34 AM
1

Ask first. If he's okay with it go for it. If he's not, realize you're throwing away that relationship if you go for it. If you're so unhappy you want to cheat, then leave. Take for damn responsibility for yourself.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 11:27 PM
1

To institutional feminists, it is the case.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 10:13 PM
2

Feminism is just a constant exercise in eschewing any kind of personal agency.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 06:19 PM
12

Talking about men's problems means not talking about women's problems 24/7, and with a diagnosis that doesn't comport with feminist theory. To a feminist anything that doesn't toe their line is misogyny.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 06:54 AM
2

Probably shouldn't be further encouraging your self worth by how many people are willing to have sex with you.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 05:52 PM
2

The point is for it to be nebulous. It's whatever the feminist needs it to be at the time to get something.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 02:55 PM
9

They're referring to "The PatriarchyTM", not patriarchies in any any context.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 11:08 PM
7

The legal speak is "preponderance of evidence"
/r/MensRights15/11/22 01:50 AM
3

They said, attending a college founded by all accounts a straight cis white male.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 09:51 PM
9

I bet the women who get into the school on merit alone will be pissed their accomplishments will be met with more suspicion now.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 03:51 PM
12

Men are the majority of victims of all forms of violence, especially public sphere violence.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 03:19 PM
13

Oh well, you've never seen it yourself so case closed?
/r/MensRights11/11/22 02:28 PM
25

The reason is that anti racists have the same logic as racists-they see any negative qualities in a person of a difference race(or sex) as a reflection of that race, and don't want to invite that insinuation for minorities-but are perfectly fine with it for whites.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 02:27 PM
6

Can't have trolls when you ban and delete anything resembling dissent.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:01 AM
11

There's a term for this: controlled opposition. They want to exist as appearing to be the other side of the coin to feminism, while really they're just in bed with it and with different branding.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:00 AM
-7

I imagine attractive male students were affected too.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:18 PM
8

Abortion doesn't undo assault, and saying abortion is taking responsibility for pregnancy is akin saying killing your bookie is taking responsibility for your gambling debts. I'm not pro life but it's a shit argument.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 06:58 AM
6

You said denying abortions=>not allowing responsibility. This implies that having an abortion is taking responsibility for...something. My question is what is that something.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 06:28 AM
14

How does that follow?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:48 AM
10

What responsibility is there when it comes to an abortion?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 01:14 AM
28

Who decided it was unwanted?
/r/MensRights08/11/22 09:24 PM
5

What?
/r/MensRights08/11/22 09:08 PM
44

Bodily autonomy privilege. Consent privilege Or a specific brand of most forms of female privilege: agency privilege. Women have choices. Men have responsibilities.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 07:43 PM
48

This is some advanced gaslighting.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 06:09 PM
8

Yeah because being at the bottom with little to no upvotes is totally indicative of the group as a whole.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:37 AM
3

You are being rescued. Please do not resist.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:35 AM
6

Oh its annoying not everyone in the world was there the first time you answered a question? Do you get annoyed when you have to tell someone you've never met before your name? In any event, let's give it a whirl: When people point out the various ways in men struggle, feminists say that's caused by men/the patriarchy, pointing to those who are in public office, but then women are the majority of the population, and thus the majority of the electorate. They're the majority of people who vote too,…
/r/MensRights05/11/22 09:05 PM
3

What would constitute an inclusive community to you?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:32 PM
14

Do you really think the only perspective on disagreeing with feminism is the tradcon perspective?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:31 PM
9

Says the person who thinks a few random trolls DMing them provides sufficient information about the value of the community. No community can police direct messages.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:30 PM
15

Comes off as? Sounds like a interpretation. We need context.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:29 PM
1

So you're saying the OP could have misinterpreted their responses, and to see whether that occurred or not requires context.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:28 PM
6

If they were confrontational or asked questions, and like some feminists claim that alone is dismissing the rape occurred, then the context is the claimant having a distorted view of what is actually being said or implied, and inferred what wasn't implied. So they wouldn't be lying, but they would still be wrong.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:27 PM
10

They did check out the post, and pointed out that their claim wasn't vindicated by the post itself. Do you know what bad faith means?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:24 PM
4

Wrong. They wanted context for theclaim that the other person was dismissed for claiming they were raped.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:23 PM
20

How is one person representative of any group?
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:22 PM
23

Aww, random trolls DM'd you? That's not reflective of any particular sub. MensLib isn't respectful to criticism of feminism. It's an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:21 PM
11

If you had bothered to look at polls for this sub, it isn't overwhelmingly conservative or liberal.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:19 PM
31

Feminist outlets and subs are the ones shitting on men and saying the future is female.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:19 PM
8

The way they do is through the lens of feminism. They don't allow for the possibility for criticism of feminism, which means they aren't actually interested in the truth. Disallowing certain paths for scrutiny means you're misguided at best, and opportunistic ideologues at worst.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:18 PM
1

When you consistently avoid the same questions over and over, the question will be kept being asked. If you find having to explain potential problems with your perspective annoying when you literally are prompting people to question it, the one acting in bad faith is you. It's you just wanting the veneer of being open to scrutiny, but only allowing easy or strawman questions to be the level of scrutiny.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:15 PM
6

Just take a screenshot of the comments. That isnt a link to the subreddit. For a group who wants to prove this sub is misogynistic, not allowing links to the sub is hilarious. Getting linked to the sub means getting ore than quote mined excerpts. The narrative must flow.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:13 PM
1

That's not an ad hominem attack. It's a speculation from anecdote, but the question itself is about the people who make those hominem arguments
/r/MensRights04/11/22 11:44 PM
2

Most men in the 1800s also couldn't vote.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 11:01 PM
1

Wouldn't want to fight violence in general, that would put too much focus on male victims.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 11:00 PM
17

The idea that you're necessarily targeting women when they're victims is a toxic combination of taking male disposability for granted and narcissism on the part of women who think this in that they must be special for being a woman to be targeted.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:07 PM
28

Patriarchy is just a secular version of original sin It can't be proven, and will always be there fitting whatever holes for opportunism for feminists seek.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 04:23 PM
11

That's not what being a feminist means. It's a specific set of ideas regarding equality, power, and gender, and feminists and academia and politics' versions are antithetical to conventional ideas of equality.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:23 PM
6

Gender neutral for the victim, not the perpetrator. It still requires penetration on the part of the offender. Since forced envelopment of men is as common as rape of women year on year, and 80% of forced envelopment victims are victimized by women, it lets feminists take credit for doing little to nothing.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 02:21 PM
1

Every pain study I have seen or read consistently shows men have higher pain thresholds and tolerances.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 06:45 AM
1

Why not give it up for adoption to the...father. If he doesn't want it, then give it to your friend.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 12:09 AM
1

What are you talking about? I didnt bring up beauty standards at all in my post.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:04 PM
1

Those things aren't conferred by capitalism. They occur with and without capitalism, and capitalism still has the least severe occurrences of them. Wealth isn't finite, and you can have infinite growth will lower rates of growth. Crocodiles never stop growing, but their rate of growth diminishes over time. This logic is specious at best and patently false at worst. I have read the literature. I just happen to have included the fundamentals of economic understanding in that.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 04:46 PM
1

The plural of anecdote is not data.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 01:46 PM
1

There's no such thing as a true Carnot Engine either, but that doesnt mean the model is useless. Your perspective belies an understanding of what modeling reality actually is, not really graduating beyond "I'm 15 and this is deep" level of thinking.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:26 AM
1

Pointing to exceptions doesn't invalidate trends. Men as a group have higher pain thresholds and pain tolerances, and are less likely to be injured from a given hit, all due to biology.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:24 AM
9

Because feminism isn't for women. It's for feminists. It carves out special departments and sears in academia, the media, and bureaucracies.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 07:21 AM
1

Probably not for front line combat.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 06:12 PM
108

I'd bet she did talk to someone about it, and they dismissed the concerns as meager compared to being seen as a privileged man.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:07 PM
17

Apex fallacy Gender roles are found in matriarchal societies like the Iroquois as well. Gender roles are found in basically every non nomadic civilization regardless of its leadership structure, and even semi nomadic ones like the Inuit. Queens and female PMs enforce Gender roles just as much as kings and male PMs. The sex of those in power doesn't tell you their political loyalty. The Roe V Wade decision was by an all male SCOTUS. The first female Justice was pro life. The overturning of RvW ha…
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:50 PM
4

Married men live longer than unmarried/divorced/widowed men, as do married women to their female counterparts.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:17 PM
-2

No one said it had to be a detailed report. I'm saying not qualifying, not necessarily quantifying, what that means is what makes for a lack of constructive feedback. Also my point was two fold, in that the other is what that means to you will differ from what it means to someone else. Subjectivity with or without feedback is the challenge. It's like saying "well I just like having fun". Well that might be true but it doesn't tell you anything.
/r/seduction27/10/22 05:53 PM
18

Of the top 10 causes of death, men are the majority of 9 of them. Stroke, something that just becomes more likely with age, is the other one.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 05:41 PM
1

The problem is those things are entirely subjective, and people aren't in general willing to give constructive feedback to people they have no interest in.
/r/seduction27/10/22 05:34 PM
19

"I can't control how delicious food is."
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:24 PM
8

Ugh I just roll my eyes when people invoke "authentic" these days. The word has lost all meaning.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:23 PM
7

If not for double standards, feminists wouldn't have any.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:21 PM
4

Or go for sole custody, since the child shouldn't be raised by a rapist.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:24 PM
6

Ladies night at its core is businesses cynically knowing men are more lonely to shell out more money if it's for women, so they try to incentivize women to congregate at the business which brings in men to spend money on them. As the old adage goes, if you're not paying full price for something, you're not a customer, you're what's for sale.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:10 PM
3

True, but the problem is there is a conflict of interest in scrutinizing the claim.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 02:24 PM
20

"There's isn't a bias in favor of women in academia, according to academia."
/r/MensRights23/10/22 05:20 AM
2

Sounds like there's more responsibility since you have to control or know when you're fertile.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 07:12 PM
28

Woosh
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:40 PM
1

Articles are written to read as charitably as possible into a study to justify a particular headline as possible. They're rarely measured or critical.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 06:02 PM
1

No, she stated she has a pronoun preference, which is to not use them.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:33 PM
1

Nope. Not using pronouns is a preference, because the preference is about what is done. Nonbinary people have pronoun preferences even if it's none. Beliefs are a statement of a position. Not having a belief is a position in religion, but it isn't having a religion. Your analogy is not apt. It would be apt if I said that their desire to not use pronouns is actually using pronouns.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:57 PM
96

"Women have choices. Men have responsibilities" ~Feminism at its core.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:54 PM
1

did not wish to use pronouns Yeah that's a preference.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 04:41 PM
1

Except she's the one stating her preferred pronouns
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:57 PM
20

Who disputed their existence?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 11:37 PM
34

Her thinking pronouns are a manifestation of gender ideology shows she just lives in a privileged 21st century anglophone bubble.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 09:59 PM
3

Everyone trusts a woman over a man.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 09:27 PM
1

True, but in this case it was a female manager. The idea every man is breaking their neck to look at her in the first 10 minutes sounds pretty unrealistic when it's unlikely every man there was even close enough to see her in the first 10 minutes.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:49 PM
2

About a year at my site, moved to another site to be closer to her husband and quit a year after. She was basically set up for failure, and largely because she thrust into a role she wasn't ready for so some managers can pat themselves on the back.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:45 PM
12

She was also my boss 6 months later. She was basically fresh out of college and didn't really know anything yet.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 11:48 PM
11

Or in my case, just take my project after it was 95% done and hand it off to her, putting her name solely on it.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 10:58 PM
13

Given it was a female manager, I wonder if it's just jealousy/prudishness on her part
/r/MensRights18/10/22 06:41 PM
7

"He has the temerity to have self worth and not worth tied to being a utility object. How self centered" Feminism is just projection from beginning to end.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 06:27 PM
2

Given Biden was a champion of VAWA to get it initially passed and replace the gender neutral Family Violence Prevention Act, no one should be surprised.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:28 PM
1

That is not the only exception at all. The mother can just not name the father on the birth certificate and give it up for adoption or abandon it in a safe haven. She can accuse any man of being the father and its the fathers burden of proof to prove otherwise or the state assumes he is. In no way is it remotely equal at any stage.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 06:17 AM
1

If the father decided not to stay after they had sex then there wasn't anything the mother could do about it. There's nothing the father can do about the mother's decision *either way*. If you want to talk about the father should then take more precautions, that goes double for the mother. >That is why I would prefer a normalising of putting children up foradoption but keep the child payments in the situation that one of theparents do want to keep the child. As long as one person can unilaterall…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:47 AM
8

Economics and the empathy bias.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 02:45 AM
5

So you're saying a women knowingly and unilaterally brought a child into the world they couldn't support? Sounds like they're an irresponsible parent and the child should be put up for adoption. Fun fact the waiting list for adoption is 3-4 times longer than the number of children in foster care.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:17 PM
2

Fun fact most of the states getting attention for restrictions on abortion are specific to *elective* abortions, and most are restricting it at 15 weeks. Most European countries restrict elective abortions to 12 weeks.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:16 PM
2

Feminism is a parasite, and as such hijacks whatever it manages to get its piercing mouth parts into to repurpose it for its own ends.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:38 PM
24

That's not true at all. Women's products tend to have more scents or moisturizers added.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 05:01 PM
17

Given the differences between the products all fall under what counts as not substantially similar, this is a token law for Virtue signaling. No surprise it's coming out of California.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 05:00 PM
2

Just point to how the law isn't enforced and abided by, i.e. the bias in enforcement favors women, from conviction rates to sentencing for the same crime to hiring shortlists for underrepresented groups to child custody. Alternatively, feminists often point to laws on the books that haven't been enforced for decades if not centuries such as marital rape, but feminist still cite their existence on the books as proof of sexism against women.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 12:03 AM
13

Easy fix: refuse to be alone in a room with any employee.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 06:47 PM
25

Feminism exploits and deepens that societal bias
/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:51 PM
77

Tradcons and feminists, name a more iconic duo.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 09:30 PM
23

Teachers who text them first.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 07:26 PM
13

Gaslighting and special pleading. They don't actually care. Feminism has opportunistic and hateful people at the helm.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 03:33 PM
11

Suffragette=/=suffragist. The suffragettes were a hateful opportunistic group. , who maligned "inferior black men" getting the vote before white women, and engaged in some domestic terrorism. The suffragists where for equal suffrage for everyone. Suffragettes got more attention because of their hateful tactics, so they're remembered more.
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/22 03:31 PM
12

In the words of one participant ONE
/r/MensRights09/10/22 02:28 PM
4

Women are already net tax recipients as a group. Just identify as a woman then.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:48 PM
1

There's a reason it's called matrimony.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:19 AM
2

Feminism has gone wrong in that it has been co opted by malicious and opportunistic forces. These forces hide behind the flag of "just for equality" whenever such criticisms are lobbied. The best advice I can give anyone raising children of any gender is keep them out of public school.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:16 AM
16

"Not one man tried a 10 on 1. How dare they"
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:15 PM
18

That logic is actually quite racist too. Blacks are the majority of murder victims in the US, and they're also the majority of murderers. No one is saying their victimhood means less because their murderers are the same race.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:15 PM
1

You're not more or less a victim based on the motivations of your victimizer.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:35 PM
5

The vast majority of men who commit suicide sought professional help within 6 months of their debt.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:50 PM
2

Security deposit for no shows, eh? So she's admitting she sees dates as a *transaction*? Well she better start guaranteeing services for these deposits too.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:41 AM
2

That's not the same thing as there being evidence of sex selective abortion. In the west girls are markedly more preferred in adoption. Surveys in Scandinavia show a preference for daughters among prospective parents as well. Sons are only preferred where it's an economic priority. Otherwise it looks to be the in group bias towards females among both men and women both takes hold.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 08:49 AM
4

Maybe in China. We do have statistics on adoption in the west, and females are favored at basically every age for that.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 02:16 AM
1

And celibacy is actually a choice, so its just shifting the accountability of the actual choices from woman to the man. No wonder feminism loves the term.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:10 PM
0

It's also a stupid term. Celibacy itself is a choice. It's just a rebranding of "can't get laid".
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:09 PM
3

Men are shallow. So are women. The only difference is how forthright each are about it.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 08:08 PM
1

Woosh.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:49 PM
20

Ah yes, they totally want more men to open up. My theory about them wanting men to be more "emotionally available" being really "emotionally available for women" is becoming more and more vindicated.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:30 AM
2

Sounds like code for single minded.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 09:44 PM
1

Men have always had a higher unemployment rate than women
/r/MensRights28/09/22 09:44 PM
2

Feminists are more interested in stroking their ego than recognizing the agency of women.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 09:09 PM
2

There isn't lack of women. Any woman who is talent and interested enough to get into it has far more support than a similarly situated man.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 09:08 PM
1

It's not a Venn Diagram, just concentric circles. Plenty of people clueless about men and relationships aren't feminists. The converse, however...
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:08 PM
5

It isnt a coincidence that the mother of gender studies was lesbian who grew up in an all female household and went to a women's only college.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:06 PM
6

If you are against violence, you're a Jain. What's that? A particular philosophy composed of multiple moral positions doesn't necessarily have a monopoly on a particular moral position? You don't say.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 11:17 PM
44

Equity, eh? Time to start pouring funding into male Healthcare to fix that life expectancy gap. That or start cutting funding for women to bring it down to men's. They aren't really for equality or equity. It's all buzzwords to weaponize opportunism.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 11:15 PM
2

Either that or there's no documented abuse by those women, which if they were abused by women is likely.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 12:14 AM
1

Since lifespans differ, instead just give everyone the same chunk of money at retirement age and they have to figure it out.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 12:11 AM
2

Lighter sentences doesn't do that.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 07:52 PM
-1

Subsidizing expectations always shifts behaviors. The only question is to what degree. More interestingly is the handwaving that is a response to that statement, when one could have shown the degree is small, or even argue it doesn't matter. You literally claimed healthcare needed to be "free" for parental surrender to work. That is making a positive causal claim regarding free healthcare. If that isn't inviting or engaging in debate, I fear you may misunderstand what a debate is. Edit: Blocked,…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:29 AM
-2

Something doesn't need to be free to be affordable for basically everyone. The 1%of the world makes 34K a year. Most "poor" people in the west own multiple cars and/or have air conditioning, things that are absolutely luxuries and cost more than an abortion. This point about the poor is based on handwaving, not facts, to say nothing about the issue with subsidizing expectations of free abortions leading to people being less incentivized to use contraception, thus partly fueling the "need" for mo…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:21 AM
-1

They aren't rights either. Things aren't rights just because they're nice. The idea that if something isn't a right you necessarily won't get it is a fallacy. Having the ability to do X is not an argument for or against doing it. It also requires asking the question what is the most effective means within morally permissible methods to achieve X. Your arguments aren't arguments, but appeals to emotion, subverting the critical examination needed to make the most of limited resources to improve qu…
/r/MensRights25/09/22 02:19 AM
-5

You don't have the right to someone else's labor though. Humanity went millenia without healthcare existing and didn't go extinct. It isnt a need, but a very valuable luxury. This idea that things which previously didn't exist are now rights is really just reframing a growing list of luxuries wealthy democracies take for granted as righrs to avoid any real discussion on how to solve problems or what rights actually are.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:55 AM
-2

Why?
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:48 AM
1

There's no evidence single payer necessarily reduces the cost of delivering care or improves outcomes. All claims that is does rely on ignoring counterfactuals like Singapore and any other factor at play that informs costs or outcomes.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:47 AM
-4

Whether it's crazy or not, it isn't necessary for it to be free for parental surrender to work is the point.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:45 AM
0

Typically it's "parental surrender is allowed within the allowable window for abortion", so its existence is conditional.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 01:44 AM
9

Then why do we do the same issues and the same gender roles in matriarchal societies, and don't diminish as more women are in power?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:51 AM
2

Because they care about power and control, while lecturing that their detractors are trying to control them.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 07:00 AM
5

Choices are empowering. Accountability is oppression.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 01:15 AM
8

Well feminists take umbrage at men having male spaces.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:56 PM
90

Virtue is hard. Virtue signaling is easy.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 05:17 AM
6

A man ignored by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth. Constantly ignoring, gaslighting, and belittling men to empower women has infantilized women and embittered men.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 06:08 PM
3

He likely has a endocrine or connective tissue disorder.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 10:48 PM
12

Theres a big difference between fashion moguls wanting to sell posters and clothing having beauty extremes and everyday women expecting the extremes for men as a beauty standard. There's also a big difference between expecting going to the gym and expecting to have surgery.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:58 PM
4

I'm 6'4 and taller than 99% of men. 7 foot men won't be the norm for a century, if ever.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:56 PM
54

The answer is easy: you claim it as such and bank on the empathy gap to have enough people just believe you.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 12:37 AM
1

2 days makes that Friday. I feel compelled to ask whereabouts. If it's near me I'll try to attend in person and provide backup.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 01:40 AM
23

Men tend to focus their emotional investment and support in a smaller circle of people. Typically it's focused on their mother in youth and their partner as an adult. There are questions to how much of this is taught vs biology/temperament.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 05:51 PM
5

Boys have sexual agency thrust upon them, often before they're ready. Girls are denied sexual agency even when they assert it explicitly-but are allowed to relinquish it when convenient. Both suffer from this double standard, and feminists are willing to give lip service to that idea as long as you accept that girls suffer more from it, and the solution feminists offer(which is to blame men and cede more power to women essentially).
/r/MensRights14/09/22 02:42 AM
1

>So your assumptions are already wrong. What assumptions would that be?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 06:51 AM
1

only one of these movements is inherently anti the other sex, and it isn't feminism. [Oh my sweet summer child](https://np.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/68v91b/woman\_who\_lied\_about\_being\_sexually\_assaulted/dh23pwo/?context=8)
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:31 AM
2

>because now women who are more capable are taking the positions that were offered them based on having a dick. Yeah now women are proactively handed those opportunities for not having a dick, or identifying as not wanting to have one. >You haven't actually managed to point out any hypocrisy in feminism, just that you don't like it because you feel that women getting equal rights has somehow taken away from yours. More putting words in people's mouths. You continue to just be a feminist troll.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 04:29 AM
6

She may want to double check who the majority of voters are. Maybe her tenuous relationship with math is a better explanation.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 03:40 AM
1

They are for the UK and the US. Are Asians not white again? The ol Schrodinger's Minority only crops up when it's convenient.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:36 AM
1

I'll tell you on your main account.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:35 AM
1

Nope. When you see no women in a hiring group, everyone is perfectly happy to assume it's because of some bias against women. Since quotas and affirmative action just means upper class white women and black men are next in line, if you see zero white men, it's almost always due to proactively excluding them.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:34 AM
5

A small percentage? It's the second largest portion of the population. You didn't actually address my point. Glad you admitted the definition of diversity includes not having white men though.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:35 PM
8

Then use your main account, or will that tip your hand?
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:33 PM
2

No one said it was women. If you're going to make a scientific or causal claim, it must be falsifiable. This isn't limited to the natural sciences.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:33 PM
2

Who perpetrates the violence is irrelevant as to who the victim is. You're not more or less a victim based on who victimized you. After all, there are likely to have whites murdered by non whites than blacks murdered by non blacks, but blacks are much more likely to be murdered, just by other blacks. CDC NIVS studies. Forced envelopment is considered other sexual violence, but surveys showed men were victims of it as often as women year on year. Men's health is worse than women's basically acros…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:32 PM
4

No white men=diversity. No women/POC=not diversity. Pick one.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:23 PM
1

Shifting the burden of proof. Clearly something done when the evidence is in favor of their position /s
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:21 PM
2

No, it means you subvert merit. If a minority is the most qualified, they don't need the quota.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:18 PM
3

How is having no white men diverse, not no women or POC not diverse? Show your work.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:17 PM
8

0 day old account. Troll and move on.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:16 PM
2

"Here's a rich story based on Celtic, Gaelic, and Germanic history and mythology" "Hey that story is too white." "Alright here's a French story about a beautiful woman who sees past appearances and a shallow man who outgrows his prejudices" "Here's some even more European literature" "Why so many white people?!" "Alright, let's do some adaptations of African and Asian mythologies and history." "Best not have any white people. That's cultural appropriation. Unless they're the villains, then it's …
/r/MensRights07/09/22 04:48 AM
3

Apologism for unfalsifiability? Feminist troll confirmed.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 04:32 AM
3

Men as a group are net tax payers, women are net tax recipients. There are far more women's only scholarships. Despite being the minority of the homeless, more homeless shelters for women. Despite being the minority of victims of violence, special laws regarding their violent victimization. The legal definition of rape doesn't recognize forced envelopment, meaning nearly half of all rapes go unrecognized, 80% of which are perpetrated by women. Politicians are willing to go against abortion becau…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:48 AM
4

There is literally a violence against women act which replaced a gender neutral Family Violence Act, and when people considered not renewing the former because it wasn't gender neutral, they were called sexist. Actual policy favors women across the board. Words are cheap. Politicians are perfectly okay going against abortion. Education is favored for girls, and politicians doubly so. "60% of those graduating from college are women. That's a great start" ~Barack Obama Boys are struggling in schoo…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 09:43 PM
5

Well politicians campaign on violence against women, but since women are a minority of victims of violence they should campaign on addressing violence against men, or maybe even violence in general. Same goes for bodily autonomy and thus circumcision and legal parental surrender. Education? Well boys are struggling more in school
/r/MensRights06/09/22 06:57 PM
4

Women are the majority of the population at 52%. They're the majority of registered voters at 53%. They're the majority of votes cast at 54%. Maybe it isnt lack of civic mindedness, but less attention to men by politicians plus a higher likelihood to be incarcerated.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 04:35 PM
17

Women are 54% of voters, so who really holds the power?
/r/MensRights06/09/22 01:43 AM
7

They're still excluded when the rapist used forced envelopment. The definition of rape requires penetration on the part of the offender. It also is limited to oral, anal, or vaginal penetration. You could have forced sounding on a man's urethra and it doesn't count as rape either.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:47 AM
2

I think the clear line of "medically unnecessary" treatment shouldn't be done against someone who can't or won't consent to it.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:45 AM
8

"Individual instances don't count. It has to be institutional." *points to literal fucking industry of circumcision and medical/cosmetic products made from it* "I'm not seeing *mass* circumcisions though." Oh we aren't gathering babies every month in one huge communal ritual for circumcision, or putting them through an assembly line being circumcised so it doesn't count? The goalpost is always moved, and lip service paid. Feminists are opportunists and little else.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:44 AM
2

They didn't when they got something in exchange for it. Feminists saw that thing and thought they should get it too, but while retaining their special protections and provisions.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 05:39 AM
1

Man is depressed, goes to therapist. Gets told it's basically his fault. Kills self. Media and feminist blame man for not seeking help. Sounds like more they're being blamed for not being enough like a woman.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 01:43 AM
3

"Having options is oppression" The fatherhood penalty of not getting to spend as much time with your children the more you work hits double at divorce, where it's held against you for custody. Of course that same contribution to the household financially is held against you when it comes to alimony.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 01:39 AM
8

It also ignores multiple births by one woman. A woman can be impregnated by multiple men as well.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:38 PM
22

The in group bias that favors women.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:11 PM
2

It's about the wrong people finding out, and for free.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:07 PM
7

When they say you don't trust them, just say that you care more about making sure when the child is sick there's an accurate medical history. Then it becomes about the child's wellbeing versus her feelings.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 05:34 AM
10

False paternity estimates do vary considerably.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 05:32 AM
2

Tell that to the next family that gets here.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 03:28 AM
6

Oh please. Some of the most influential MRAs are women. Might want to dial back on your superficial sexist thinking.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 03:07 AM
6

Is it? Should it be?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:54 AM
8

Brotherhood implies women aren't welcome in being part of helping men through such an organization.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:36 PM
15

The *voting age* population is not the same as the number of registered voters. [There are 82.2 million registered women to 72.4 register men](https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/number-of-individuals-who-voted-in-thousands-and-individuals-who-voted-as-a-share-of-the-voter-population-by-sex/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D) for a total of 154.6 million registered voters. 82.2/154.6=53.2%. ​ Women also have a higher voter turnout than men(6…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:54 PM
19

The population is 51% female. The voter base is 53 or 54% female IIRC.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:17 PM
1

Most voters are women
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:17 PM
2

Probably in jail.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 07:16 PM
2

So almost all of those 70% are in jail and have no income I presume.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 07:15 PM
3

Someone selling treatment isn't interested in the cure. Someone selling the cure isn't interested in prevention.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 06:35 PM
10

It's also not as if they're trying to force women to be virgins.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 10:58 PM
1

I'm saying part of most people's relationships is sex, and if it's important enough it makes the relationship overall an unhappy one.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 05:18 PM
1

Oh silly me. I didn't realize relationships don't include a sex life. Did you read the article within the context of reality?
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:51 PM
5

It was always about favoritism.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 04:11 AM
20

One should ask why it was sexless. Was it his fault, or because she didn't want to have sex with him, but still wanted all the other benefits of being in the relationship?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 05:03 PM
148

Which of course is bullshit, because if they are unhappy in the relationship they would leave.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 05:01 PM
12

And gaslighting to boot
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:52 PM
34

Virtue is hard. Virtue signaling is easy.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 05:13 AM
7

What's interesting is you didn't say fat, but fatter than you. Now I wonder if women who expect men to be in as good or better shape than them were banned.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:15 AM
2

Jokes on you, I don't see gender.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:35 AM
7

mouth breathing, neck bearded, autistic virgins Pretty ableist of them, and the disabled are a vulnerable, right?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 09:55 PM
14

They asked for exact, not direct. Feminism was never about equality from day one. The Declaration of Sentiments and the Tender Years Doctrine are proof of that.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 07:11 PM
11

Male only spaces are not allowed under the purview of the sisterhood.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 06:49 PM
24

So to her, critical thinking and scientific literacy is toxic masculinity. No wonder so professional women in STEM reject feminism.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:34 AM
25

Every generation of feminism has to rebrand its opportunistic bogeyman. Patriarchy, kyriarchy, cisheteronormativity, now toxic masculinity. It's always relies on some evidence of sexism, proving the existence of their bogeyman, and then using the bogeyman as the reason for any opportunistic venture. Question it and you're questioning the fight against sexism. It's just a Motte and Bailey fallacy.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:33 AM
33

It seems women have it in their heads that since in the past there were male only spaces where women has no input, all male only spaces are suspect, not just ones that are halls of power. The Temperance Movement is a perfect example, where women didn't like men going to bars after work and having casual conversations that weren't monitoring by them. The Temperance Movement successfully got the 18th amendment passed by making it out like they were victims of drunken assaults, getting enough sympa…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:56 AM
5

Not quite. They are okay pro male as long as through a feminist lens. Anyone who questions the sisterhood defining what men's problems are is not allowed though.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:12 AM
1

>on the onset of puberty, required to get a vasectomy >each male can bank their sperm before the vasectomy Ah so this woman doesn't quite get how male puberty works. It takes a while before sperm are matured.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 02:17 AM
17

Tinder? As in people looking for a hookup? That's definitely an issue of selection bias. Frequent mismatch? Maybe that has something to do with the fact women aren't honest or forthright with what they're looking for. No one is disputing that women lie about that for strategic reasons, but to think it's all self preservation is oversimplistic at best, but gives a nice path for plausible deniability for the more selfish reasons.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:35 AM
26

Many guys? How many? Knowing what you like isn't required to know what you don't like.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 07:21 AM
98

Those kinds of women aren't in denial of their shallowness. They just don't be own up to it or be held accountable for it. When a woman lies to you to "spare your feelings" about the reason she's not interested, that's really her trying to spare her ego or reputation. And because there's an endless line of men who want to fuck them and not call them out on it, most women get away with it. I've told women to their face they will get more respect from their friends and men in their lives if they j…
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:00 AM
273

"Emotionally available" sounds like code for "emotionally accommodating". When I was in my 20s being honest and forthright about my thoughts and expectations made me "an asshole", even though I did not insult or personally attack them. "Share similar values" is a two way street. This expectation that men are the only ones who need to step up when you're just not compatible is telling.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:51 AM
1

I feel Well you see there's where you went wrong in determining what is and isn't actually the case. Whats the solution, exactly? Have athletes schedule their competitions based on their cycle? Nothing wild get accomplished except women who effectively don't have one while athletically active.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 12:36 AM
2

0 day account. Go troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 05:07 AM
3

laughs in Ripley from Aliens More accurately she doesn't recognize what a good female character is. Also it seems not very feminist of her to rely on men. Surely if women aren't too stupid to enjoy it, why did it still have a poor opening? Well feminists do rely on men, and try to shame them into compliance. That tactic is running thin thewe days.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 05:58 PM
5

"I didn't assume their gender. I was just stopping a human being from breaking the law."
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:10 AM
14

In my experience female strip clubs tend to defer to the dancer herself. She picks the boundaries and of you cross it they have you kicked out. This does vary a lot by state though.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 02:01 AM
5

Sounds like she already spoke to a lawyer. Best get yourself one.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 06:25 PM
3

That long 4 piece is gonna rail you too.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 12:47 AM
1

Isn't Willet's Twitter handle "Nimby Aligned Misandrist"?
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 08:03 AM
3

"Getting to share the same room with a woman counts as benefiting men"
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 08:01 AM
6

Feminism claims women are oppressed, and boys aren't victims of sexual abuse by women, or when they are it isnt as bad.
/r/AntiFeminists16/08/22 08:00 AM
116

Oh God that study even claims video games cause sexist attitudes towards sexual activity. What a shit show
/r/MensRights16/08/22 07:53 AM
26

Blacks are overrepresented among rapists. In fact all nonwhites expect Asians are overrepresented for violent crime. Take that same logic, and it becomes "teach blacks not to rape/murder/etc", which of course is racist. Women are the majority of child abusers and child murderers too. ​ Every2min is dyed in the wool misandric rag that not only uses debunked stats like the 1 in 5 stat, but posts gems like "Stop seeing rape victims as daughters and sisters and start framing rapists as sons and brot…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 09:32 PM
8

"Evolution is just fundamental Christian's version of Creationism" Just because two things are competing ideas or philosophies does not inherently put them on equal moral or empirical footing. It isn't merely a matter of opinion, and while both could be wrong, it could also be that only one is wrong.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 06:05 PM
1

Social skills require honest feedback. When people lie to you to "spare your feelings", or ghost you, you don't get proper feedback. When people treat you as a means of utility until something better comes along, and then the reason you're given-if any-is not the actual reason, you don't get proper feedback. When you're told your behavior is creepy or toxic, without qualification as to why or how, you don't get proper feedback, and that's if the reason is actually they think it's creepy/toxic an…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 01:54 AM
2

As. As. Do you just not know how adverbs work?
/r/MensRights14/08/22 03:35 AM
2

AS DISPOSABLE. AS. It's an adverb modifying the adjective for Christ's sake. This truly is you having a deficit in reading comprehension or just straight up lying.
/r/MensRights14/08/22 01:33 AM
125

Step 1: open up emotionally Step 2: get shit on from women Step 3: get blamed by women for not being emotionally available Why do I think for some women at least, "emotionally available" is code for "emotionally accommodating to me"
/r/MensRights14/08/22 12:26 AM
2

I'm not seeing anything in the OP that claims that. Where are you seeing that?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 11:54 PM
2

Okay reading comprehension fail. The metrics were cherry picked. Again no one asserted only men were disposable. Get off the strawman and read.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:17 PM
2

I see something running around half cocked, so at least the handle suits you.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 10:16 PM
2

Funny, where did I claim the class was bad? You don't know what curriculum is either and yet you think it would to those here. Lazy effort trolls are so boring.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 09:36 PM
2

You cherry pick one aspect of China and ignore any contravailing data. It is only an excellent example who is an ideologue, sucks at math, or is just lazy.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 09:35 PM
2

Yes you have demonstrated a noticeable lack of effort in your posts.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 09:03 PM
2

You're just flatly ignoring all other aspects of violability and that far and away affect men more than women.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 08:14 PM
1

I'm on my phone and have no problems. You can scroll through your comment replies where they're me too.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 07:46 PM
2

No one ever said they were never disposable you bloated squirrel. They said men are more disposable. Reading is fundamental.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 07:45 PM
2

You're woefully naive if you think the government enforcing its rules doesn't come with violence. It doesn't really matter: 78% of Chinese murder victims are still men, so despite that policy men are still more disposable.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 06:42 PM
1

Are you incapable of reading the post with 3 independent clauses indicating them?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 06:41 PM
1

Why should it trigger an alarm in one's brain? Even academics in the same field will disagree on things. You see it in economics and sociology all the time. The problem is your knowledge was not used to address my argument, but merely dispute the conclusion, and without regard to the argument. We aren't using the same information to lead to different conclusions. We're using different premises, but you're disputing my conclusion for not comporting with your premises. This is shouting past your d…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 06:40 PM
1

I'm aware of what it is. I didn't qualify my claim, so you have zero reason to know that to which I referred as being a non sequitur, and thus have no basis to say claim is nonsensical. It might make no sense to you, but isn't the same as it being an invalid or incoherent argument. Google is your friend. Get yourself a refresher on the fundamentals of logic and reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 06:20 AM
2

In other words, only when families are threatened with violence to not favor girls are they not favored. Left to their own devices, girls get favored, and usually that favoring is enshrined into law.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 06:18 AM
69

Feminists are the emotional equivalent of the schoolyard bully: why are you hitting yourself
/r/MensRights13/08/22 04:12 AM
136

"Emotional connection is still something we're not teaching young boys" Well gee, who are the teachers and primary caregivers? Maybe it isnt that at all, and men are available emotionally but are shit on so constantly that availability becomes more of a liability.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 02:56 AM
18

I cynically expect "healthy relationship standards" is code for acquiescing to the woman, but I'll wait to see the article.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 02:53 AM
1

To be a Tom Brady you'd have to play against men. Not lose to the 205th ranked one at the in your youth, then later complain to get equal prize money at Wimbledon despite bringing in less revenue and because the game is shorter for women also get to play doubles and thus make more than the men.
/r/AntiFeminists13/08/22 01:55 AM
2

105 to 100? The same...as the natural birth rate? 78% of Chinese murder victims are male. Did you just hear one child policy and just fill the holes in your knowledge with paranoia instead of looking anything up?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:42 AM
1

How do you know it was an erroneous use when I didn't qualify it yet? They're written in the post.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:40 AM
2

Well I have not said word one about proving a negative in the last 10 days. Don't think I didn't notice you neglecting to address the other 2 points I brought up.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:28 AM
2

As: to the same degree or extent. Men in China are murdered to a greater degree.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 01:26 AM
1

A bit exasperating when the person you're talking to is being overly dogmatic and reductive, i s n ' t i t ? I presented the argument, and you didn't address the argument on its own merits. Me not being convinced by an argument that fails to address my argument on its own merits isn't me being dogmatic. It's you not understanding the exercise. Lol. Nothing aside from being the primary tool for advancing scientific knowledge, boss. Given the biological definitions of human and chimpanzee, you thi…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 12:57 AM
3

But I would suggest that any form masculinity that leads a man to treat his life cavalierly is, by definition, a toxic masculinity. Ah men sacrificing himself to save others is toxic. >Women generally aren’t the ones encouraging boys to do risky and stupid things to “prove they aren’t a faggot”. Well yeah. Women are telling men to "be a real man", which ends up being some form of utility to her. But that's not toxic at all.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:17 PM
2

Uhm, modern China? Where girl daughters were killed during the “one child per family policy” to a degree where it created a serious gender imbalance? As. Disposable. Women still lived longer and were less likely to be victims of violence, and still receive more public support, to say nothing of the fact the one child policy is no longer in effect. >Funny how people on this thread always remember the white feather campaign but forget the MUCH LARGER women-led peace campaigns that were all over th…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:15 PM
1

And the troll tips their hand. ​ How would you know if I'm this poster if you're only a 10 day account unless..you're a sockpuppet for another account. You say I'm using non sequitur in a way that doesn't make sense, but since I didn't qualify my use of it, you have no way of knowing what I meant by it. Then you go with the classic feminist troll well poisoning of "well, you must just hate women to think that".
/r/MensRights12/08/22 11:06 PM
2

Using forced envelopment, men and women are victims of rape at the same rate. 80% of men who are forcibly enveloped were forcibly enveloped by women. This puts men and women 50/50 victims, and 60/40 victimizers.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 06:02 PM
1

You can't have that SRY transcription factor without the SRY gene is the point. You're the one being reductive here. I explicitly said it was a necessary condition, and no such analogue existed for female gonads. Experimentally means nothing here. You could experimentally out a chimp brain in a human body but that doesnt change what it means to be a human or a chimp. I'm not working from a bio101 definition of sex at all. Sex is black and white because that's how our biology is. Some organisms h…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:18 PM
2

This post is rife with non sequitur, and I don't have the patience to outline it right now.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 05:04 PM
1

The presence or absence of the SRY gene is what determines whether the gonads become a sperm producing or a ovum producing gonad. Lyonization alone can explain many of the differences between the sexes, and has nothing to do with the other genes on the Y chromosome, or the presence of the Y chromosome, but the distinct lack of a second X chromosome in most males. And yes having testes leads to higher testosterone levels which affects the mullerian and wolffian ducts differently and leads to more…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 08:00 AM
2

Feminism to men is guilt-tripping, victim blaming, and gas lighting all rolled into one. It weaponizes the power women already had in society already and wields like a blunt object towards whatever the latest feminist demand is.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 01:36 AM
3

The particular string found in males is the SRY gene. There is no male that doesn't have it, since in the absence of it the mullerian, wulffian, and gonad tissues will default to female. Splitting semantic hairs my ass. We're literally talking about the definition of something. Sex in humans is defined by gametes. That is what anisogamy is. There are only 2 sexes, and they are male and female. Ambiguity in secondary sexual characteristics means nothing to the definition of sex. Having a differen…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 12:57 AM
5

You don't see the inherent contradiction in those statements? You're a 9d old account.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 11:36 PM
7

And the goalposts they are a movin. Not all Fortune 500 companies are American companies, or headed by Americans Asian Americans have a higher average household income than white Americans. This is especially the case for Indians, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean households. ​ 76% of American millionaires are white being 65%, with 8% of Asians while being 5.7% of the US. That puts Asians much more overrepresented than whites. Blacks are 8% with Hispanics at 7%, meaning Hispanics are more underrepre…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:41 PM
4

Ah so you can't be advocate for women's rights without being an expert apparently. Also you can't even know if you're a woman or not unless you're an expert too. This is the problem with that logic.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:37 PM
3

laughs in Asian American Feel free to go back to Marxism and its ideology of spite and envy.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:19 PM
3

You don't need to be a biologist to know what a woman is. You don't need to be an expert in a field to know the fundamentals of that field. It was a bad response because it's an evasion.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:06 PM
5

Gametes is how we define sex for anisogamous organisms. XX males are still male. There's no partial about it. Sex is the reproductive condition of an organism. Humans reproduce by binary fission of haploid gametes, thus their sex is defined by gametes. Anisogamous organisms' gametes are distinguished by size. There are no male or female chromosomes. For humans there is the gene that makes you male, or your undifferentiated tissues default to female. The SRY gene is a necessary condition for bein…
/r/MensRights11/08/22 10:05 PM
3

They refused to answer because they're not a biologist.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 09:22 PM
2

"What's best for the child, according to the mother" It's just like feminism, where they're for equality, according to feminists.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 07:02 PM
14

Also "what is white"? Iranians and Israelis are pretty white.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 06:45 PM
6

They're referring to when that nominee was asked to define a woman.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 06:45 PM
6

Sex in humans is defined by gametes, not chromosomes. Your genes, not your chromosomes, determine which gametes you produce.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 06:44 PM
9

Apex fallacy aside, the "power+prejudice" argument doesn't even pass the sniff test. Weird how the institutions of power intervene on behalf of non whites, the power isn't in the hands of white people. It's all weaponized opportunism under the veneer of equality.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 06:43 PM
2

The women are wonderful effect plus women tend to network better
/r/MensRights09/08/22 08:16 PM
2

The women are wonderful effect plus women tend to network better
/r/MensRights09/08/22 08:16 PM
6

Laura Bates is the founder of "Everyday Sexism", with pulse pounding insights like: people accused of sexual misconduct being granted anonymity until convicted is misogyny. Women's pensions being smaller because they retire sooner and work less is sexism. Pointing to when women are murdered by men, and never when men are murdered by...anyone, to highlight sexism. A woman's right to be abortion isn't in the constitution, like it isn't in nearly every developed country, and despite legislatures co…
/r/MensRights09/08/22 04:43 PM
7

It should also be pointed out that the women's higher viewership in the US has nothing to do with the women's team directly. They got further in the tournament and viewership is higher for those games. Looks the men's vs women's viewership for the same point in the tournament and the US men's team still gets more than the women's. The women's team gets further than the men's not because the women's team is so much better than their competition, but because the rest of the world's best male athle…
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:28 PM
2

Yeah its a matter of practicality whether you protest something a country does by defying the rule while asking permission to enter that country.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:20 PM
2

Has the death penalty for selling drugs, but it does have very severe drug laws in general
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:19 PM
3

They actually don't get the same viewership worldwide, and much of the dispute was after they won the world cup
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:17 PM
1

Yeah everyone knows people making 200K a year are constantly resorting to going to Russia.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:16 PM
2

The "more complicated" version is just politicized shaming and opportunism. You're a 3 day old concern troll. You're using the Motte and Bailey fallacy all over this line of reasoning.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:26 AM
1

Yeah when the common refrain is "teach boys not to rape", I don't really give any benefit of the doubt that's how this training tends to go.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:25 AM
2

The aversion is a) because it's often not so much training as shaming, thinking grown men don't know how consent works and b) it only applies to men
/r/MensRights05/08/22 03:23 AM
6

Except the problem is these gender swaps are usually just pandering in lieu of good writing, because that's easier and comes with an army of online feminists to come to your defense. No one here has a problem with female characters. They have a problem with shitting on or pushing out male characters to elevate female ones, and ones that are usually poorly written.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:35 PM
1

So will this be Harley Quinn the PHD psychiatrist who is also a poor victim, or the one who outgrows him and is a empowered lesbian? Either way how Harley Quinn is treated narratively for her mental health is very different than Joker is, and thus far has.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:26 PM
1

This is more "society continues to focus on women's complaints/issues". This literally has aspects addressing men's mental health and its a joke/threat to people, whereas Harley Quinn is either a poor victim or a boss bitch is outgrew him.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 10:24 PM
7

Primary Aggressor Laws, care of the Duluth Model, by FeminismTM
/r/MensRights04/08/22 08:25 PM
12

Fits a woman isn't the same as once it fits *me/the person who will be using it"
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:02 AM
5

Some tried to argue women suffered more because they had to agonize over the choice of leaving their male loved ones behind or risk their lived fighting with them. Some just said "well someone has to fight". Most were silent, or focused on celebrating the few women who stayed, while maligjng the suffering of women in Ukraine in general.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:18 AM
6

Women are most likely to kill or abuse children, so we shouldn't trust women around children by the same logic.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 11:08 PM
1

Did she explain why it's different? If not it's just special pleading. Thats the key piece here: make them show their work. Most people in general not just feminists are pavlovian in their responses, and many don't think them through. Get her to go through her thought process as to why it's different, leaving breadcrumbs of how it is indeed a sexist double standard, but by asking questions instead she comes to the conclusion herself, or is struck by cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 11:07 PM
9

Whether it exists or methods fail doesn't matter if you don't have a voice in it either way. Then again you're a zero day old account, so I smell a concern troll.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 11:03 PM
5

Considering how much more often men are violent towards each other, maybe they should be encouraged more to not resort to violence in general.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 05:59 PM
2

If women had the same sex drives as men, they would be having sex as often as them. Women have an easier time finding a partner when they do want sex but are still less sexually active. That suggests they do not have the same sex drive as men, and it is a false dichotomy to suggest the only other alternative is men are sex crazed maniacs.
/r/MensRights03/08/22 05:27 PM
5

Most people don't realize that in the US before the Roe V Wade turnover it had one of the most liberal abortion restrictions at 24 weeks or more even for elective reasons. Most developed countries cut elective abortions off at 12 weeks, and the few that don't have it at 18.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 07:05 PM
21

They not obsessed with sex, but they do seem obsessed with getting to be a gatekeeper to it.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 06:28 PM
31

Not the best example, since surveys have shown a lot 2/3 of women admit to using Tinder simply for an ego boost. They're looking to how many people find the hot enough to fuck, but don't follow through on matches. Of course even if that wasn't the case the survey has selection or response biases, only 1/3 of Tinder users are women anyways.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 06:26 PM
16

Hey look, a convergence of tradcons and feminists.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 06:49 AM
16

The second is a royal consort, which is interesting how many of these self styled queens see themselves as deserving of just being pampered for the access to have sex with them.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 07:25 PM
12

Given the word "man" comes from the proto Germanic word for "person" and "boy" comes from the word for young servant, that's either very telling of what they expect of men or ignorant of what actually undermines the patriarchy. For the most vocal feminists undermining the patriarchy is just shitting on men and furthering their own bottom line.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 07:24 PM
1

Yes but for whom has changed over time.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:48 AM
1

Could you explain how people don't comprehend what the MRM is saying instead of them just rejecting it outright for running contrary to what they understand to be true?
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:33 AM
1

Could you explain how people don't comprehend what the MRM is saying instead of them just rejecting it outright for running contrary to what they understand to be true?
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:33 AM
1

Only for minority men. Thinking like that white men is totally okay. Pointing out white men are underrepresented for most male commissions of crime is also not okay.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 01:59 AM
1

I always was reluctant to negotiate or counter offer; I hated the stress and anxiety of it, while fearing I may bid myself out of contention. My fears seemed to be unfounded when I tried this year for two offers this year and it was a 5-10% difference. Women tend to be more risk averse in general, and anyone who is man or woman will make decisions about their careers accordingly.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:21 AM
1

It's a common statistical trick to use rankings without showing the actual values.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:20 AM
5

That's because that sub is a misandrist circlejerk.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:06 PM
4

That's specifically the horror genre though
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:38 PM
2

The difference being those are Horror films, while JP and MCU are fantasy/adventure/action
/r/MensRights31/07/22 08:37 PM
2

Both parties to the marriage were bargaining chips. That doesn't make them literally property. It just means marriage was transactional for some.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 06:44 AM
2

Being a woman did not mean being a possession for your father or husband.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 12:10 AM
2

Nothing is ironclad these days, least of all what is electronic
/r/MensRights30/07/22 04:36 PM
6

They don't want sex and you do. To them it seems selfish but it seems one or both of you are unwilling to discuss why. It's not selfish to want sex. It is selfish to want sex regardless of their feelings. You gotta hash it out and see whether you can reach an understanding or this is a deal breaker for you two.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 04:31 PM
29

She also fixes Latveria in a few days, something Dr Doom, who is arguably the smartest man on the planet couldn't do. Riri Williams was poorly written and rightly not well received. They're going to try to force it anyways.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 03:25 AM
4

Why would I need a real argument against nothing more than mocking and incredulity?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:47 AM
4

Yeah like a one day old account concern trolling and engaging in apologetics is legit.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:43 AM
2

Except if women are socialized to never grow up, and rhey act like children, then it isnt something inherent to women. Of course you don't cite the comment itself, let alone showing how frequent such comments are. You reading things uncharitably and without perspective or context and then continuing to report to others your uncharitable assessments is why. You have to lie to get people to not take it seriously.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:18 PM
1

Promoting hateful things? Such as?
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:17 PM
2

[Citation needed]
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:16 PM
2

I have asked you before to substantiate that claim and yet you never do. You smack of a AMR alt account amongst a sea of sock puppets driving this "perception"
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:15 PM
1

Ah yes, /inactivists is a hate group somehow. Also my old subreddit I made with for debates between feminists and MRAs no one uses is a huge threat.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:14 PM
3

"This doesn't do enough for women"
/r/MensRights26/07/22 09:04 PM
1

Tender years doctrine pushed by Catherine Norton and her feminist sisters. This well documented instance of history is ignored by feminists. It's almost as if they cherry pick history. Feminist groups oppose alimony and child support reform. Their version of independence is relying on men indirectly.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 01:13 AM
1

Speaking of religion, patriarchy is just a secular version of original sin. It's unfalsifiable and can never be solved. Hierarchies exist with and without religion. Ignoring the conditions at the time means ignoring why they occurred in the first place. Feminism is what pushed the tender years doctrine which led to women being the default caretaker.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:46 AM
1

A religious allegory isn't a social system either. Whether it matters or not is part of the question. Your assertion ignores instances like conjoined twins. It's assertion and evasion to the central contention of the topic. You also ignore historical context with regards to being allowed to work. Men were forced to provide for women, and were responsible for household debts even if they were run up by the wife. That is why men had priority: they given the agency associated with that obligation. …
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:33 AM
1

Languages are social constructions, as is the order in which the alphabet is arranged. Your argument regarding abortion completely ignores the complexities of personhood and where it begins, as well as where it ends. Your definition of inequality is all solely from the perspective of women, which is one of the chief problems with feminism. You define patriarchy not as inequality but women not getting what they want. When it's shown men are oppressed in many ways more than women especially when i…
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:13 AM
5

Well female comes before male alphabetically so I guess the Latin alphabet is matriarchal! Abortion is philosophically complex but you seem to think anyone who disagrees with you is PatriarchyTM You've basically made my point that "Patriarchy" has mutated to "anytime women don't get what they want" and isn't actually about the nature of the power structure in place outside it not catering to women.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 11:44 PM
9

They said, not realizing that the remainder of the agricultural workforce is men. This is just complaining that poor people exist, and some are women, and because not enough is being done for the former, the latter are affected so sexism.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 08:25 PM
7

Feminists are fairly consistent in denying the agency of women.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 06:08 PM
17

When it's still a patriarchy when women are in charge, or when women are the majority of the electorate choosing who will be in charge, calling it a patriarchy is abandoning what words mean.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:18 AM
18

Because patriarchy now means "whenever women aren't getting what they want" which itself is a treadmill of demands as societies become more productive.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 02:17 AM
67

A) some just assume those who are critical of feminism must hate women, because they treat feminism as beyond reproach B) some who would rather not have to deal with that criticism so they attempt to poison the well instead of having an honest discussion C) propaganda from group A and B that deters other people from even seeing for themselves
/r/MensRights24/07/22 04:36 AM
15

It isnt inherently an issue that boys and girls be raised differently. It's increasingly clear that boys and girls respond to and use different learning strategies. Basically every country in the West is reluctant to hold women accountable to the same manner and degree as they do men.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 11:51 PM
5

All that and they can hope to get 50% custody, not sole custody.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:54 PM
10

Women earn less than men because they work less and choose lower earning career paths. So what? At least it's due to their agency and not due to bias against you for your sex in grading and admissions
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:25 PM
2

There's a big difference between aborting someone if they're a particular sex and because they're a particular sex.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 02:09 PM
5

Empowering women to monopolize relationships legally is indeed a product of feminism, and not recent feminism, but 19th century feminism.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 01:33 PM
1

Or they aren't sciences, and don't presume to be. Psychology has similar empirical limitations when self reported data is the least reliable and we lack telepathy to test for falsifiability. Not all truth is scientific. Math isn't scientific either. It's all deduction from a priori assumptions. I'm a chemical engineer, and have had plenty of classmates call themselves scientists when there are clear differences between science and engineering.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:46 PM
1

Psychology is notorious for its lack of reproducibility. That's a hallmark of soundness of the scientific method. History and economics are full of controversy, but a lack of consensus doesn't mean it isnt scientific. In fact economics is called the dismal science because of that difficulty. At least they're not smug enough to fashion themselves as scientists.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:29 PM
11

When my research into the history of feminism showed its an obstacle to equality.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:58 PM
3

When you go "hey autism isn't a mental disorder because you're not a threat to others" when your brain is literally different and you have deficiencies in certain forms of cognition-I am on the spectrum and don't sensationalize or play coy about it. I'm honestly kind of offended they do this because it tries to normalize something people struggle with as if there isn't something you can do about it. I've learned you have to work harder on things that otherwise come intuitively to normal people. …
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:43 AM
3

You know I forgot about linguistics. We can add anthropology on there too. I didnt say psychology didn't have competing schools of thought. Psychology has long abandoned a pretense of being scientific, as it's been co-opted by political forces within, much like sociology. Economics can be quite politicized, but without not within. Economists themselves often lament how politicians tend to not listen to economists when their findings aren't politically profitable or expedient. When you rewrite th…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 04:15 AM
5

Your oppressor does not become more noble when they change the color of their tie.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 02:49 AM
13

Eh, I'd say economics and history are far more grounded than psychology. Sure there are competing schools of thought in economics, but they're acknowledged as such, at least among intellectuals in that field. Psychology brought us the Duluth model for domestic violence, an empirically bankruptcy framework for family dynamics in general.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 02:31 AM
10

spend more of their life in poor health Yeah and women are more likely to die of a stroke than men, while men are more likely to die of the other top 9 causes of death. Oh the burden of living longer!
/r/MensRights20/07/22 04:39 PM
6

And the "hate on women" is more often than not the hate on the situation wherein women are rationally exploiting the situation that favors them.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:59 PM
3

Institutional feminism is an obstacle to men's rights. It is not the cause of all men's problems but it is the cause of some. It monopolizes the conversation to women's perspectives only so it prevents solutions to men's rights even it isnt the cause of it. It is a movement of weaponized opportunism under the veneer of equality, and does so by robbing women of agency, treating them as fickle mush headed children with no rationality or initiative of their own(women are making the "wrong" choices …
/r/MensRights20/07/22 02:58 PM
3

I'm fine with continuing later. There isn't a rush.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:41 PM
2

Weird how you had time until now. Saving face basically confirmed.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:19 PM
3

​ Funny how the list is short and contains nothing of what I stated. Funny how it wasn't exhaustive and your second complaint is just "it didn't agree with me". I'll say it again, when women on average prioritize education more than looks the tests and statistics will better reflect the neurological data. Women literally outnumber men in education now, and it doesn't. You're just desperately clinging to statistical artifacts. There are other factors at play here, such as all of these women who g…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:09 PM
3

This entire argument has been you trying to prove to yourself that women aren't intelligent and couldn't possibly be better than men at anything. Okay sure, just ignore the things I explicitly said women were better at, and that women and men on average had the same intelligence. It's almost as if you selectively read what I wrote. I told you what you wanted to hear, men are supeiroir now you camn feel good about yourself. Will you fuck off now? People like you are so disgusting Yes strawmen ver…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:52 PM
3

I don't think women are dumber than men or you're less than me. Keep putting words in my mouth when you're backed into a logical corner. I know you're probably not used to encountering someone else familiar in medicine or sexual dimorphism in humans, and you through no fault of your own seem ignorant of genetics, but maybe don't infer hatred from detraction.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:39 PM
1

Studies show women are favored 2:1 in hiring in STEM fields.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:36 PM
1

Not having feminism=/=restricting rights from women.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:35 PM
3

Cogent rebuttal. I'd recommend a couple classes on prepositional logic or maybe some basic philosophy classes for critical thinking while you're still in college.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:35 PM
3

Call me when DV shelters start allowing teenage boys to come with their mothers. Oh wait those shelters just treat all men as threats.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:33 PM
3

Ypu do realize there are millions of feminists in the world right? Meanwhile, feminists with influence like NOW... You complain about power structures men are in, but then dismiss out of hand the feminists in power and "don't give a fuck about them" I find it ironic you use a few bad apples to justify hating an entire group of people. You're the one literally engaging in apologism for them. No one here is saying they don't care about male rapists.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:32 PM
3

>men created the system to stereotype the sexes and give women most of the custody becuase of those toxic ideals Nope. Tender Years Doctrine was spearheaded by Catherine Norton in the mid 19th century and her feminist sisters. >If men have as much if issues with the syeym as women then we should both be trying to change the patriarchy into something more mutually beneficial that isn't based in outdated thinking. Wrong again. Matriarchal societies like Iroquois had the same gendered division of l…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:30 PM
3

You've confused me not being convinced by your superficial cherry picking with me not caring about data. When I dispute the rigor of your argument and explain how you're wrong, that isnt ignoring data, its directly engaging with it. This is a classic error in critical thinking. You think because your conclusion is based on data, anyone who disputes your conclusion must be ignoring data. There's no consideration on your part that you've drawn premature conclusions or that your data is incomplete.…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:26 PM
3

It isnt a scientific fact the female brain has a higher capacity for intelligence. You're simply wrong there. You've cherry picked elements of the brain that confirm your biases, completely ignoring that studies have routinely shown people capable of using different regions of the brain to get the same answer, especially in math problems. The average intelligence is basically the same for men and women. There are more genius men and more moron men. Men are more variable than women for anything a…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:02 PM
3

I didnt say you were less than men. You seek to think the only alternative is to be superior to them. Again, you time and again show you need a primer on critical thinking, and maybe reading comprehension. You clearly read what you want to see in things, from what you infer from detractors to information that confirms your malinformed biases. Your confidence is a lot of unjustified ego from what I can tell.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 07:53 PM
3

I'm not ignoring anything. You're cherry picking data. It hasn't been proven at all. I have no problem with women being intelligent. I have a problem with busybody pseudointellectuals waving their Dunning Kruger syndrome like a badge of honor. You think you're right, and haven't considered the possibility you're wrong, and so childishly infer anyone who disagrees with your position is a misogynist. Society favors women in almost every arena. You're just do used to it you have a distorted perspec…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 07:35 PM
3

Men aren't superior in every possible way. At the risk of oversimplifying, male physiology is high risk high reward, and women's is safety first. It's why men have better vision, but are more prone to color blindness. Men are more likely to be geniuses, but also more likely to be dullards. The tallest and shortest people living and to have lived are all men. Men have weaker immune systems and poorer senses of hearing than women. Women have higher basal dopamine and serotonin levels which makes t…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 07:22 PM
3

No, different levels of activity dont necessarily mean different overall effects. Some structures may be more or less efficient, for example. STEM fields actually have a hiring bias in favor of women. Even when women outnumber men in higher education men still dominate inventions and science. The imposter effect has been quite disputed as the methodologies that capture it tend to start with different baselines for comparison in the first place, and are only reproducible using fishing expedition …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 07:03 PM
3

Being more active isn't the same as have any meaningful difference in effect. I'm not putting women down at all. I'm saying your claim women are smarter isnt substantiated. Average intelligences are basically the same, and there are more men at the extreme highs and laws. You thinking me saying men and women are equally intelligent on average is putting women down says a lot more about you than it does me.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:31 PM
4

The corpus collosum=/= intelligence. Women are in fact not better at multitasking. That is a myth. There is no real difference in multitasking ability. Specifying certain regions where women have more volume ignores where they have less-the other regions. You definitely need a primer on critical thinking.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:59 PM
3

Brain size relative to body size is indicative of intelligence, which was my comparison. You're just saying "nuh uh". Women only need like 10 minutes more sleep than men, and that's due to a slower metabolism, not because of their brains. The whole maturing far younger thing makes me think I know where you got the idea Women were smarter: you're harping on a study of 16 to 18 year old boys and girls and found girls cognitive performance outdoing boys. Of course this ignores that since girls beca…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:09 PM
3

If the man refuses to take a paternity test-or fails to in the allotted time, even if the mother have false contact information-the state just assumes you're the father.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:02 PM
9

Being male doesn't preclude repeating feminist doctrine, and suggesting women aren't smarter than men doesn't equal hating women. You may want to take a class on critical thinking while you're at it.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:51 AM
11

On average Men have slightly higher IQs(they're effectively the same) but Men's IQs have a higher standard deviation. You seem rather malinformed on a topic you claim to be majoring in.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:50 AM
8

Neurology doesn't say the female brain is smarter. Men's and women's IQs on average are quite similar, although men are slightly higher. Men have higher gray matter density, women white matter. Men hage a greater brain mass relative to their body weight. Men are overrepresented among IQs 120 and above 2:1, and 30:1 for IQs 160 and higher. Men are also more susceptible to learning disabilities. Men are more variable, but nothing says women are smarter either on average or at the extremes.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:48 AM
7

I suspect lesbians commit DV more often for the same reason heterosexual women are more likely to initiate: they've been socialized to think their violence is justified, or not a real threat.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:45 AM
12

Men are more socially acceptable recipients of violence. Regardless of who the abuser is, men are overwhelmingly victims of violence more than women.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:44 AM
8

In other words, you're addressing a claim that wasn't made here, either to be a distraction or out of misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:43 AM
40

A) this is specific to DV, not all crime. B) Femicide is a thing, but not all women killed by men are killed because they're women. In fact most aren't. Andricide is also a thing. C) 50% of DV is reciprocal. 70% of non reciprocal DV is initiated by women. 40% of DV injuries that require hospitalization are men. Spousal homicide is 60/40 female/male victims. The best predictor of a woman suffering a DV injury is her taking the first swing at her partner. There is parity in DV perpetration and vic…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:13 AM
30

obvious murderers That sounds like code for "ugly". It's not as if there are that many murderers at large, but evidently it takes them an hour to find a match that isn't one.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:47 PM
7

The latter give plausible deniability to the former.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 03:30 PM
2

The average person who identifies as a feminist is reasonable, but they give plausible deniability to institutional feminism, i.e. feminism in academia and politics where it exerts its influence.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 03:29 PM
14

Not the MS Bill.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 01:03 PM
10

Now do female circumcision.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:11 PM
28

Elective abortions are typically not allowed after 12 weeks in the developed world. For comparison the Mississippi law that was upheld with the overturning of Roe allows it up to 15 weeks.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:11 PM
7

Surely you have something to back up that claim.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 12:09 PM
7

Except you seem to keep encountering different, new people asking for evidence.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:22 PM
3

So its in your post history, and you can't link to that post?
/r/MensRights15/07/22 11:10 PM
11

Your claim isn't just there is misogyny, but there is apologism for it when you try calling it out.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 10:16 PM
10

So you answered it time and time again but never bookmarked it? A tactic of...asking you to substantiate your claim? You can even try to show how people are apologists for this alleged misogyny, the fact you thinking it's misogyny itself being subject to scrutiny notwithstanding.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 09:27 PM
7

Then surely it would be trivial to answer my question
/r/MensRights15/07/22 09:01 PM
2

Then say the same thing with "black people".
/r/MensRights15/07/22 08:11 PM
21

Please cite hatred here that has been consistent up voted.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 06:14 PM
3

I wouldn't be surprised if men have fewer accidents per mile driven because they drive more and get more experience. Nonetheless men cost more to insure, so their premiums are higher. Same goes for life insurance. Now if only people were consistent when it comes to health insurance.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 05:13 PM
1

And the help either doesn't exist, focuses on women, and/or blames men.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:17 PM
25

Sounds like the US, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was Canada or France.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:22 PM
52

"I have no way of contacting him, but I do have his contact information so you can get his money."
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:22 PM
14

Men drive significantly more so they have more damage per unit time.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:23 PM
34

That's when you then say "well blacks are much more likely be victims of public violence too especially murder as they're the majority of murder victims, and primarily by other blacks, who are the majority of murderers. Are you going to say blacks are the real problem?" Also the claim that men aren't targeted for their gender and women aren't is entirely based on whether the assailant is the same sex as the victim, which just makes it a non sequitur. You could just as easily say men are targeted…
/r/MensRights15/07/22 06:01 AM
1

Even when women are in charge, patriarchy is to blame. Even when women's career prospects are due to their own choices, it's really other people pressuring them. The Duluth model characterizes men as oppressors and women as helpless victims, even when they initiate violence. The list goes on
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:52 PM
61

"Well men are much more likely to be attacked walking down the street, so you're basically saying your feelings are more important than what actually happens or who is actually affected"
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:15 PM
12

"How men's deaths highlight the victimhood of women"
/r/MensRights14/07/22 08:29 PM
1

If you think having the option to fight is suffering, then I guess you think agency and freedom is suffering.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:24 PM
10

Then sue for custody
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:07 AM
26

If you're talking about how it uniquely affects men or women, then no. This article isn't the case. You're a 0 day old account. Go troll someone else.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:18 PM
25

The scope of that article was conscription. If the scope of the article was how Ukrainians are affected by the invasion, and you only refer to one sex or another, then you're being sexist.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:11 PM
37

Women aren't conscripted in the US, so that's an odd choice to bring up.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:06 PM
6

To some people men are not people, but a means to the agency of others, either to increase or decrease it.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:05 PM
60

Referring only to women's suffering as if it's distinct from men's while making no mention of men's suffering implies the latter is less or non existent.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:03 PM
2

"He must be overcompensating for a tiny dick" is literally what is meant with "small dick energy".
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:34 AM
6

Being manipulative and opportunistic is very rational of its an option. This isn't unique to women, although women arguably have more opportunities to be so.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:21 PM
17

What are you using for the numerator there? Why would you only look at single parent households?
/r/MensRights10/07/22 03:52 PM
24

Men being treated more harshly by the justice system are also victims. Pointing out women get away with murder is part of that.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:48 PM
7

Yeah because the women in men's lives have no influence on what connection those men make or allowed to maintain.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:35 PM
35

I'm sure they would be just as okay with talking about female anatomy.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:26 PM
4

This is a token gesture to try to draw an analogue to what pro choice politicians characterize women are now subject to. It isn't a good faith bill.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 04:24 AM
3

Given their captor was asleep at the time, it wasn't their only vector for escape.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 01:27 AM
4

whether the pregnancy was from consensual sex or not So they want to allow women who rape men to sue their victims. The reality is this is a DOA bill meant to Virtue signal what she thinks women will be subject to.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:29 PM
1

Uh no. NEC proliferation is week 4, but the cerebral cortex isn't the pain center; that's the dorsal posterior insula which begins development in week 6. Cranial nerves begin developing well before the spinal chord, including the trigeminal nerve. Only mammals have a cerebral cortex, and plenty of non mammals are capable of experiencing pain. What is unclear is at what stage of development nociception is possible.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:37 PM
6

They are, but under the veneer of fairness and equality, which gives them plausible deniability to the average person who identifies as a feminist and by and large are more reasonable in what they see as fairness and equality.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:30 PM
1

It is highly disputed even among experts when the capacity for nociception occurs.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:24 PM
1

As I said, it is 12 weeks for elective abortions, and for things like fetal impairment it is typically 18 to 24 weeks.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:22 PM
1

It is a form of knowledge still.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:21 PM
34

Feminism in academia and politics are not for fairness and equality.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:08 PM
43

It should be noted that most developed countries only allow elective abortions up to 12 weeks, and non-elective(rape, incest, fetal impairment, maternal health) up to 18 to 24.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 03:58 AM
11

Feminists are quite antagonistic towards anyone who doesn't affirm their superficial theory.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 06:22 PM
8

"Partriarchy hurts men too, and patriarchy causes [X to women], so by focusing on X, we're fighting the Patriarchy, and thus helping men." Nevermind whether X is due to Patriarchy at all doesn't matter to them, and any activism of feminism that has created or deepened problems for men are dismissed as having done so because "we're fighting the Patriarchy tho!". Of course as time as gone on, more and more things are due to the Patriarchy, including things women do of their own accord with and wit…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 06:21 PM
2

It is an exercise in testing what people actually think equality means.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 04:38 PM
21

Lacking evidence is a key sign of neither a false nor a true accusation.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 10:06 PM
5

It isnt a baseless assumption. The entire point is that with such policies in place, all groups that benefit from said policy warrant more scrutiny The entire point of OP was to criticize the policy, as it has led to what appears to be an incompetent AG.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:55 PM
6

You just said she must be more qualified. Malta has a policy of positive discrimination. It's not just an assumption out of nowhere. This is why those policies are bad: it can lead to unqualified people getting hired and it increases scrutiny over qualified people that are hired.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:48 PM
8

On what basis was she clearly more qualified? You can't say "because she was hired".
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:43 PM
12

Well the position is for a lawyer for the state, and she's not a lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:32 PM
7

You didn't answer my question. What qualifications did she have to be Deputy AG in the first place? She's not a lawyer from what I can tell.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:29 PM
10

How did she get the Deput AG spot? No one blamed her gender.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:13 PM
59

That sounds like textbook misandry to me.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:12 PM
38

"We're going after your rights, men!" "I mean you still have more reproductive rights than us." This is all about control and spite.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 11:40 PM
2

Stop trying to control other people's reproductive choices and take precautions against that which you can't control. For too many people think doing the latter means you can't or shouldn't care about doing the former.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:50 PM
12

It's all comes down to control. Women wanting to control their own reproductive destiny is perfectly fine, but there are some women who wish to also control men's as well, at least to the extent it benefits them.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 05:49 PM
12

The justice league cartoon years ago had an episode where a virus basically affected only men(including Superman, an alien). Cities are on fire, crime skyrockets, and they act like the 10% of fire and police service that are women are enough to handle it all. Wonder Woman even comments on why women think men are so important, and Hawkgirl says "try them sometime" with the implication being they're good for sex. It's meant to be a "girls get it done" kind of thing but it's completely tone deaf.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:03 PM
1

He also mentions that labs are less likely to be interested with natural ingredients, as it means fewer things they have to develop themselves. It's hard to say whether it's as amazing as it sounds when it fell on the cutting room floor so early in its development.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:35 PM
9

Legal parental surrender is abanding a clump of cells. Women choose whether that clump becomes a living baby, so its only women creating babies.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:47 PM
4

Even the first one available in the US was, but that was Gregory Pinchus. It does poke a hole in the balloon on birth control availability if men could get pregnant.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:02 PM
7

That's not the only reason. He also acknowledges that because it's from a widely available natural ingredient that labs aren't as interested in it.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:01 PM
28

Coutinho was also a man who helped develop Depo-Pereva, new versions of female contraceptive which is now the most commonly used(norgestrel) and discovered that hormonal birth control could help treat endometriosis. Additionally he was a founder of the ICCR(International Counsel on Contraceptive Research), and helped developed subdermal contraceptives. He is an unsung pioneer on contraception who goes largely unacknowledged and found himself running headfirst into the feminist machine who though…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:54 PM
1

Actually before the Roe overturning, the US had one of the most permissive abortion limits in the developed world. Most developed countries limit elective abortions(not due to rape, incest, fetal impairment or threat to health) at 12 weeks. The Mississippi law that was allowed to stand limits it to 15.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:50 PM
2

Ministress of Equality. We're well on the path of Harrison Bergeron and the Handicapper General.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:44 AM
1

Your point doesn't exist in a vacuum is my point.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:35 AM
5

Now would she do the same for a daughter who bullies a boy...
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:12 AM
1

Not comparing it to the rate of circumcision of boys to single mothers or lesbians means that information is incomplete to determine the impact the sex of the parent has on it. If you see similar rates among female parents deciding to circumcise its just culture.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:17 PM
2

I guess you didn't notice the huge wellspring of support for what women want and seeking resolutions to the most recent ruling?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:36 AM
9

Tone deafness is a requirement for feminists these days.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:19 PM
3

Yeah it couldn't have anything to do with 80% of women saying they prefer circumcised men.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:01 PM
4

Idealism: giving the majority everything they want doesn't impact the minorities ability to get what they want Practicality: people have less of an incidentive to cooperate when they have less or nothing to gain.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:41 PM
4

Talking about reality vs idealism.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 07:17 PM
2

What threshold of development is needed? If that isn't known or can't be known, you either assume is or isn't at that threshold, which means the threshold doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:51 PM
2

The state has a vested interest in protecting people living in its jurisdiction. The question is whether fetuses are persons.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:47 PM
4

We actually don't know when consciousness is possible. The cranial nerves start developing in the first trimester, allowing motor function and pain reception before the spinal cord.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:31 PM
1

Thing is most pro lifers are also about personal responsibility, and sex without reproduction is recreational sex, which is great, but not something society has a responsibility to provide.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:29 PM
4

Brain and notochord start developing by week 5. Cranial nerves including the trigeminal nerve responsible for pain and motor function in the head week 8.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:11 PM
8

It's funny because there were vocal groups of women's advocates who said abortions being legal would lead to men having less reason to use contraception and could just coerce women to get an abortion afterwards.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 04:10 PM
9

Which doesn't really alter anything I said.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:10 PM
6

Polls say otherwise.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:44 PM
5

Pro lifers are roughly 50/50 men/women. Edit: they blocked me after responding.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:44 PM
2

Half of pro lifers are men. Roughly 1/3 of men are pro lifers.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:21 PM
13

You mean like 1/3 of the women on the court, much like 1/3 of women that are pro life?
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:15 PM
16

Roughly half of pro lifers are women. Roughly 1/3 of women are pro life. The same goes for men.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:12 PM
42

Well the Roe V Wade decision was by an all male SCOTUS. This SCOTUS is 1/3 female.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:11 PM
6

Well the right thing to do is fight for equal rights, and the political reality is that acquiescence here gives up a ton of leverage to achieve that.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:10 PM
13

So you're saying when given leverage we should abandon it so those who would exploit that leverage and not reciprocate can get what they want? This is why Mena rights is a thing: people bend over backwards to get women what they want to where it ruins any kind of negotiation or acknowledgement that others have their own priorities.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:09 PM
78

I always countered no penis no opinion when it came to MGM, or conscription of only men. The Roe V Wade decision was in favor of abortion rights and it the majority was all men. "No uterus no opinion" was and always has been a shaming tactic to silence pro life men, and make it seem like pro life women didn't exist. When it's pointed out similar numbers of pro life men and women exist, they shift tactics. It's always been a rhetorical strategy to muddy the debate.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:04 PM
1

Everyone tries to justify their self interest. They even define greed/selfish/etc to not include their priorities but does include the priorities that conflict/compete with their own.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 05:45 AM
6

Most men can't either.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 03:14 AM
18

Ah yes, it's petty to oppose conscription but not petty to justify it because "women are generally hopeless in combat". If you're attacked, having the option to conscript every able bodied person and not just who is most disposable helps men, women, and society. I'm not even pro life and am so tired of how practically every pro choice argument I here is just rife with special pleading.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:52 PM
11

Ask feminists has increasingly changed its posting criteria to retain the appearance of a discussion whose disallowing much detracting. Before I was banned I adhered with each and every rule change, until they made it where effectively impossible to disagree. In college there was a feminist group that did the same thing. It's possible to have real discussions with people who identify as feminists, but in my experience it is only with individuals, never with any organized group of them. The kinds…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:27 PM
2

The common leg is bodily autonomy. Martial law kicks in, we need babies made now. All women are now broodmares. You're suggesting that because there are differences they can't have similarities, which is simply a non sequitur.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:29 PM
35

Ah so because women are affected, the fact the most affected are the ones on the front lines having to wield a gun are men still somehow means men aren't more affected in the long run.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:27 PM
6

That doesn't mean it's okay, or your rights aren't being violated.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:25 PM
7

If that follows even for single mothers, that just speaks to culture and the father being circumcised is secondary to that.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:24 PM
15

Oh except when martial law is declared? So when the state decides what your rights are? You have rights until you don't, basically.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:40 PM
10

As long as you ignore which parent is making the decision for the child.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:37 PM
79

Weird how martial law negatively affects men more than women then.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:36 PM
15

No, the mother is going forward with a pregnancy and unilaterally creating a child. After all if fetuses aren't children, and there's no legal obligation to a fetus, then only women are creating children.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:22 PM
6

Blaming toxic masculinity along the way while calling feminine things gender neutral.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 02:10 PM
6

It's not really a loophole since they already include anyone cohabitating, has children with, or works with the victim.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:17 PM
3

They're never able to substantiate the claim that the sub is toxic or misogynistic. They're either blindly poisoning the well or heard about the poisoned well and shy away from it.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:10 PM
9

It goes out the window because strict liability doesn't require mens rea.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:41 PM
3

Not when the plurality of households are single parent households, and the overwhelming majority of them are female led.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:39 PM
20

Which has little to do with what is happening now. It is women who were shaping children's minds then and now; arguably moreso now with more single parenting and fewer male teachers.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:16 AM
17

More accurately all societies are gynocentric. Patriarchies just have more plausible deniability.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:50 AM
4

No, it's saying compassion without action is.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:04 AM
23

It's important to remember when it comes to positions of power who put them there. Women are the majority of the electorate. They make the majority of consumer decisions. They're the majority of child caregivers and primary and secondary teachers.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:03 AM
9

Well it's patently false its solely from the perspective of men. Feminists want you to believe it so they can justify their opportunistic and hateful perspective.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:34 PM
4

A) no it isnt B) there's nothing wrong with having a woman's perspective. What's wrong is having it solely from a woman's perspective.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:25 PM
12

That is feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights21/06/22 03:27 PM
1

Everything good that feminism takes credit for could have been achieved without it, using a philosophy that isnt opportunistic and hateful or stands on the a foundation of special pleading and well poisoning.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 07:48 PM
5

It boils down to feminists trying to control sexuality. Of course men have tried to control sexuality throughout history too. The difference is feminism is about placing women in a superposition of empowered and oppressed at all times, and it is not until the convenience of the which is revealed do you know.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 07:23 PM
18

I'm 6'4 so I tend to stand out anyways, but if someone thinks I'm following them in a parking lot they can change their behavior if they want. It's not my job to appease irrational fears. If they want to ask if I'm following them they can, and I'll politely tell them no and move on with my life.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 07:09 PM
93

Its a turn on and affirmation to turn them on. The problem is sometimes they don't reciprocate or provide feedback. Plenty of women have the same complaints so it comes down to who you choose to be with and how much you actually voice your concerns.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 06:52 PM
12

And being separated from father figures.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 07:15 PM
14

75% of the worst mass shooters since Columbine came from fatherless homes.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 07:15 PM
8

The figure is 2-8% are demonstrated to be false or unfounded. They're interpreting it as uncharitably as possible.
/r/MensRights18/06/22 05:17 PM
95

"I'm creeped by the presence of men that serve me no purpose because I'm an entitled sexist"
/r/MensRights18/06/22 01:47 AM
7

It's only a fair standard if it's okay to hold everyone to it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 10:25 PM
33

I honestly felt I didn't know much about feminism so I looked into its theories, history, and activism. I took college classes on it. I made a point to look for criticisms of it too, and strove to not embrace it implicitly. I found it telling how much animosity I received merely by questioning it.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 07:06 PM
4

Yeah that's why marriage is referred to as being bound in matrimony.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 10:55 PM
1

Most people are expedient and self centered.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 10:54 PM
5

What percent of women in the survey are the primary household earner? That seems to be an overlooked question.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 02:08 AM
9

"Femcels are easily frightened, but they will be back, and in greater numbers"
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:43 AM
7

Oh it says it happens within the context of societal oppression of same sex couples, which is a weird non answer. Even it's creator Ellen Pence has admitted they went in with a predetermined goal of finding what they wanted to see, namely men committed DV out of a desire to control and dominate-and men who didn't articulate that were simply in denial. Of course she's dead now, and the malicious and opportunistic feminists whose careers bank on it are exploiting her corrupted legacy.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 09:29 AM
22

No, they saw the writing on the wall and went private, then left en mass to their own secluded circle jerk island where the PatriarchyTM can't hurt them.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 05:29 AM
8

Washed up? Before Heard trying to ride the embers of the scorched earth campaign of MeToo, he was was the most popular and highest earning actors. Feminists in journalism are all just opportunists that when backed into a corner of intellectual integrity they lash out with projection.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 05:28 AM
45

The Duluth model basically defines domestic violence as patriarchal.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 12:14 AM
20

As I recall since Columbine 75% of the most deadly mass shooters came from fatherless homes.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:15 AM
15

"Feminists don't hate men; they just named everything they don't like after them" ~ GirlWritesWhat
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:06 PM
3

No it isnt. It's only standard to sexist agitators. We already have terms for unhealthy behavior.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:37 AM
53

"Calls him out for being patronizing" is not the same as "calls him out for thinking they are patronizing" You characterized the OP's position as in dispute and their accusers as the null position.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:17 AM
2

Except the toxic elements aren't limited to men or masculinity. It's just unhealthy behavior, so its just another shallow shaming term.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:10 AM
60

Interesting you assume the accusation must be true.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:08 AM
131

Well there's already a word for that: patronizing. Mansplaining is a sexist shaming tactic.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:07 AM
22

Plenty of crimes are one of opportunism and not malice. That doesn't mean they're suddenly okay.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 02:36 AM
4

Oh my sweet summer child. One day you'll realize the agency and complicity of women in shaping society. One day.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:04 AM
9

Sure, as long as you ignore who is demanding those things of men.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 12:42 AM
3

The majority of those who identify as feminists are naive idealists. The majority of feminists with influence are indeed misandrists and opportunists exploiting society's acceptance of misandry as a vehicle for their opportunism.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 07:55 PM
9

No there isn't.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:10 PM
1

Because men are just seen as disembodied wallets and sperm donors, not fathers.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:00 PM
8

Women in general is comparing all female wage earners to all male. It's not comparing for the same work.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:54 PM
34

You missed the point: even for the same wage, men work more hours so their earnings will be higher.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:01 AM
14

Thing is, feminism in practice from day one has been about favoritism.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:17 AM
27

Thing is, feminism in practice from day one has been about favoritism.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:17 AM
3

Similarly, if a woman feels she doesn't want to put out for any reason that too is her choice. A lot of work has been made to show its wrong to shame women into complying into desired behavior, but it seems the opposite is for men. Social media has allowed shame and condemnation to come from more than just a circle of friends/coworkers.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 07:46 PM
1

Weird flex but okay.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 03:48 AM
8

"Men need to speak up more" is a trap. They want men whose opinions don't comport with their own to be identified so they can be isolated. You see this in individual women shit testing men sometimes as well.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:02 AM
5

To a feminist, everything bad comes from the Patriarchy^TM, and the only way to fight it is with with feminism. It leaves no room for anything else being the cause of the bad, or any alternative for the good, and indeed no room for any element of feminism to be bad. It's no different than fundamentalist Christian dogma of everything being bad is due to Satan, and God is all good.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 02:43 AM
2

That it is.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 03:24 PM
1

It also isn't forcing one to stay in abusive relationships when demonstrated abuse no longer makes it 50/50 default.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 07:43 AM
5

Well they believe in "the patriarchy", so of course they believe in other unproven concepts.
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 02:06 AM
2

The difference in sentencing between blacks and whites for the same crime is 10%. The difference between men and women is 60%
/r/AntiFeminists05/06/22 12:27 AM
2

It usually means the award is smaller, since there's more sharing of the workload of caring for the child.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 07:19 PM
-8

I have no doubt that allegations are sometimes made to secure custody, but what data do you have to support the claim the vast majority are? Edit: downvotes for asking for a source? Take a breather from frothing at the mouth, people.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 06:30 PM
24

They outright lie sometimes too. "This will force women to stay in abusive relationships, or force unwilling parents to be a part of the child's life which is bad for them" They completely obscure the fact it's default 50/50 custody, not automatic without any rebuttable conditions.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:46 PM
10

Florida Bar doesn't want easy cases.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:44 PM
2

Sure, just ignore that women are less likely to be convicted for violent crime, especially domestic violence. That is a sampling bias to use the prison population, to say nothing of the fact that male prisons tend to be more crowded which can increase anxiety or increase the chance of encountering an aggressive person even with the same rate of aggression between men and women.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 06:39 PM
1

Ah my mistake. As I recall the US banned the importation of slaves in 1815 too, but that did little to curtail slavery there.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 03:58 PM
2

Are they, or are they just less likely to share different views? Looking at voting trends for example a greater portion of women vote one particular party than men.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 02:45 PM
1

The Dominican Republic would like a word.
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 02:44 PM
2

Based on whose standard?
/r/AntiFeminists03/06/22 02:44 PM
11

"Men get away with rape, that's proof of male privilege." "Women get away with rape even more, as well as every other crime" "OH that's because of patriarchy."
/r/MensRights03/06/22 01:42 PM
5

That's not news. That's...olds
/r/MensRights03/06/22 04:15 AM
7

65 to 75% of non custodial fathers who are in arrears are so for the inability to pay
/r/MensRights02/06/22 01:14 PM
6

Your error is thinking the reason for the down votes is mere detraction.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:29 AM
10

Tis a troll account, move along
/r/MensRights02/06/22 01:42 AM
13

kills off all homeless people Finally, we've solved homelessness!
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:49 AM
20

Fatherlessness is higher among African Americans
/r/MensRights29/05/22 02:12 AM
20

Yeah they stopped looking at what creates toxic men; they just blamed them for being toxic.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 12:10 AM
3

The address is only given to qualified registrants? Can't have protests or journalists exposing them .
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:58 PM
25

In before "men die more because they want to appear manly saving other people".
/r/MensRights27/05/22 04:41 AM
35

Men are 82% of non custodial parents, but 95% of those in prison for being in arrears, despite the fact non custodial mothers are more likely to be in arrears than non custodial fathers.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:06 AM
2

It's all about Virtue signaling. They're trying to show they're good people by being on the "right" side. The right side is the woman's unless there's overwhelming evidence to contrary.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 09:46 PM
9

Amber Heard isn't just a false accuser; she's a victimizer. Victimizers are about as imperfect a victim as one can be.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 05:21 PM
110

Feminism is just institutionalized protection.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:38 AM
24

Murder suicides are a very small number of suicides, but here's the thing: let's assume most murder suicides are straight men killing their partner then themselves. If you cared about saving women's lives, you'd be concerned about murder suicides by men too. This is nothing more than feminists being bad at math and just caring about shitting on men.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 06:58 PM
5

Evolution has made women safety first and men high risk reward genetically. It shouldn't be surprising we see this reflected in their behaviors overall
/r/MensRights22/05/22 05:14 AM
1

Tenure disparity, educational disparity, sick/vacation days taken disparity, the list goes on
/r/MensRights22/05/22 04:37 AM
12

He's referring to circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 05:51 PM
5

Motives matter when it comes to the question of whether rapists know its wrong or not. If power over an adult matters more than you'd see an increase or similar rate of rape for adults in their 30s and 40s as much as their 20s, but we don't see that.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:15 PM
1

Or maybe the victims have a distorted view of what is healthy sex because of their own victimization.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 03:00 PM
5

The evidence for that is dubious. If it was just about power the elderly and prepubertal children would be the majority of victims. In reality 80% of rape victims are between the ages of 12 and 30, i.3. Postpubertal and prime physiological age. Also prisons that have conjugal vista report lower rates of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:59 PM
16

It's entirely based on trying the maintain a narrative of blaming society so they can indoctrinate people into their theoretical framework. There's no real critical examination of what drives people to do it.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:57 PM
2

It's still an irreversible genital surgery.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 01:30 AM
4

Removal of the foreskin is legal to be performed on infanrs, even when medical unnecessary
/r/MensRights19/05/22 10:46 PM
2

Anyone who has actually worked in these industries knows this.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:25 PM
11

If the women want a slice of the men's tournament, they can try to compete in it.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 03:33 PM
10

The US women's team didn't qualify for the men's World Cup either. Why do they get a slice of that pot? This is like complaining a WNBA team did better than an NBA team, and the former should get the latter's bonuses.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 04:16 PM
27

This is based on the world cup performance though
/r/MensRights18/05/22 04:11 PM
10

Which has nothing to do with the actual pot of each, and by golly viewership in the US isn't all the viewership of the matches. Plenty of non US viewers watching the matches with the US teams. This is nothing more than bad math to get women to have a slice of the money the men earn, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 04:02 PM
9

And the men's world cup pot is bigger because wait for it...it gets more viewership
/r/MensRights18/05/22 03:35 PM
23

Except viewership of your match isn't the same as the cup itself. This is just bad math plus lies by the women's team.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 03:33 PM
3

Except this for the world cup, where the men's world cup gets for more viewership. The US men's team doesn't have the country's best athletes, because they go to football, basketball, baseball, and hockey. For the rest of world, their best athletes tend to go into soccer.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 03:31 PM
51

The women's world cup doesn't have as much as the men's world cup
/r/MensRights18/05/22 03:30 PM
5

Women=/=feminists.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 02:03 AM
1

Hmm, we could apply the same logic to the fact most child abusers are women. Or that 90% of victims of sexual assault/rape in juvenile facilities are male inmates by female staff. Or maybe we could admit these are all stupid and don't fly with a basic understanding of statistics.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 11:55 PM
2

I think NJ actually takes that spot, but it's been a while since I checked.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:30 PM
2

Because those states are okay with the "right" kind of discrimination.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:21 PM
23

There isn't any proof of it; if there was, companies would actively be doing so instead of just checking a box.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:20 PM
1

It's not evening the playing field; it's changing the score at the end of the game.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 09:19 PM
8

Fun fact: false positive for breast cancer screenings are non trivial too.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 06:46 PM
4

Obama couldn't have decided to veto the bill unless the coverage for men was part of it too.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 06:45 PM
19

It required tubal ligation to be covered with no copay or change in premiums, but not vasectomies. By a staggering coincidence when that aspect the ACA came into effect the cost of vasectomies went up.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 06:44 PM
3

I imagine the same is true when the same number of men are absent.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:02 PM
0

Here's an idea: maybe advocate for more sick leave in general, which you can take any condition that impacts your ability to do your work, and doesn't require you to disclose why you're taking it thus minimizing judgement. Oh wait that isn't as easy as invoking emotional appeals because women.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:01 PM
1

"What are your thoughts?" "Is she single?"
/r/MensRights15/05/22 04:23 AM
2

A recent study found that of men who committed suicide, 89% sought professional help of some kind within 6 months of their death. It's not men are unwilling to open up. It's that whenever they do no one seems willing or able to help them.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 12:04 AM
17

This is why I like the movie Aliens. All the marines were given gender neutral names and just made into certain kinds of characters with certain personalities. Then they held auditions and whichever man or woman best fit the character got the role.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 09:44 PM
3

No, but they are expected to not buckle under high pressure situations, especially when ones life is on the line. There are some men and women who think men showing emotion is weak, but thats usually just them being self centered. A man showing emotion means they're thinking about themselves and not the self centered person.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 05:28 PM
8

75% of fathers in arrears are so because of their inability to afford it.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 04:25 PM
1

The language of the bill still exists. If you're saying it isnt available to the public yet, you don't know the language and can't say the answer to any of my questions is no.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:36 PM
1

No the legislation to which the OP refers.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:20 PM
1

I'm asking because I don't see the language of the law. If you've seen it please provide it.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:16 PM
5

It never was.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:45 AM
4

Does that include women who have had hysterectomies? Amenorrhea? They're on birth control and likely have no period? What about being straight up pregnant? Men have weaker immune systems so do they get special days off as even colds and flus are more severe for them? >The ministry also intends to pass a law targeting the trafficking of women for prostitution in Spain. But not...trafficking of slave labor, which primarily affects men. >Rodríguez has also announced her plans for Spain to become a …
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:07 AM
6

Women are more likely to face violence that people, or at least feminists care about.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 06:38 PM
6

What’s a “modern feminist organization”? Feminism isn’t a club or a political party. It’s a set of ideals based upon equality. You mean like NOW? >This constant framing of feminism as a political party that’s running on a specific platform or oppressing men is absurdly ignorant at best, and willfully misrepresentative at worst. This constant apologism of feminist activism because "it's not a monolith" is as superficial as it is cowardly. >This is just a circle jerk of hating feminists and women …
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:45 AM
11

How about we go with what is primarily achieved and advocated for by feminists with influence? Child custody going to women? Well that's the Tender Years Doctrine by feminists. Even modern feminists organizations oppose 50/50 custody by default. Male victims of DV not recognized? You can thank the Duluth Model and primary aggressor laws, both from feminists too. The list goes on. Feminism in earnest has been a means of opportunism and malice.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:52 AM
0

No. SCOTUS decisions are overturned by either a later SCOTUS decision or by the legislature amending the constitution.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:45 PM
7

What idealistic version of feminism you have in your head does not determine what feminism ends up being.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 10:33 PM
1

Well you're a troll or functionally illiterate. Either way it's a waste of time. Bye.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:44 PM
1

No, you're just a troll. Bye.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter