TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

UnconventionalXY Archive

View 7 posts and 2,909 comments by UnconventionalXY on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,909 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Many men are involuntarily celibate, but that's no reason to label them the scum of the earth by using a manufactured pejorative slur like "incel". Perhaps we should be calling every woman who has sex with more than one man a "slut", with as much justification as calling men by loaded terms such as "incel".
/r/MensRights06/02/24 11:41 PM
1

The risk of getting it wrong might suggest leaving the country and never coming back is the safest proactive approach if the OP is adamant they do not wish to be baby-trapped. Are lawyers prepared to advise the best course of action in the best interest of men, including leaving the country, or only as far as the best interest of their fee and to hell with the risk of the man getting caught up in something he can no longer escape from? Men also tend to get held hostage by their feelings that it …
/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:45 PM
3

Incel was created by women as a pejorative term against men, which is ironic because it was women rejecting sex with those men that made them involuntarily celibate in the first place and now women are criticising men for being what women chose to create.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:32 PM
3

If people are held not responsible for their actions by reason of intoxication, then they should be institutionalised and treated until they can guarantee they are unable to be a further threat to society by repeating intoxicated irresponsible behaviour. Society must be protected from people who can not be held responsible for their actions at the time: it should not be a get out of jail free card that can be played to get people off the hook for killing someone.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 01:55 PM
4

Interesting conjecture and I agree civilisation needs more research, which I think could be aided by AI which is specifically programmed not to have bias in its analysis of the data. I think biology and its roles rule us more than we care to admit and reason a much thinner overlay to the primitive emotional impulses than we want to believe. Fundamentally, men are driven to have sex, whilst women are driven to have children, but both have a protective instinct towards the young of any species. Th…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 01:42 PM
4

No, it takes the joining of sperm and egg to have even a chance of conception: a process that doesn't require a man to knock up a woman, but merely live sperm and various ways of introducing it to an egg. It has even been done with dead men who had no possibility of knocking up a woman, by extracting still viable sperm from their body and introducing it to an egg. Every man needs to understand that he has no legal rights over the use of his sperm, only legal obligations stemming from its use, an…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 03:33 AM
2

Might suggesting termination be considered coercion in the current climate of womens lib and mens obligation? Women can change their minds on a dime and especially with encouragement from other women to take advantage of the situation and the support of law in favour of women over men. The risk is considerable that it will turn out badly for the OP. Since the OP has no control over the situation, is it safe to wait and see how things turn out, including the paternity test, or will waiting simply…
/r/MensRights06/02/24 03:02 AM
18

The only choice seems to be not to put your dick in any woman if you don't want any risk of a child, based on that statement.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:20 AM
3

Men do not make women pregnant, her body does that by biological design. Her body, her choice, her responsibility. If women have a problem with that, complain to the creator, don't hold men responsible. That being said, men are held responsible by law even though how their sperm is used is not under their control. Understand the law as it applies and protect yourself as best you can by using the law for your own interests, which means a lawyer.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:04 AM
35

Use of the term "incel" needs to end in the same way that society has effectively banned the use of the n-word against negroid people.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 01:59 AM
28

Breaking consent over sex for men is a crime of rape, but breaking consent over conception for women is an opportunity.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 01:52 AM
10

And you are likely to be accused of mansplaining as soon as you open your mouth.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 06:27 AM
13

What's more likely, a pedophile out in public with his victim or a Dad with his son? Yet women jump to the first conclusion as though they are Florence Nightingale saving someone's life, without reason. Especially since an increasing number of men are separated and spending some time with their children, or do women believe that all children should be with their Mom at all times regardless? What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
/r/MensRights31/01/24 06:25 AM
11

Walking on eggshells for life because of women's paranoia is not an acceptable way for men to have to live. Even avoiding women is eventually going to be interpreted as a deliberate slight against them and subsequently treated as an offense that needs to be punished. Just like police now wear bodycams to identify the truth of situations involving them, I believe men will need to do something similar in order to protect themselves against false accusation and women being protected ahead of men in…
/r/MensRights31/01/24 06:15 AM
12

You are being logical and reasonable, because that is how most men operate, however women don't seem to operate on reason but emotional impulse and its justification. Men will assess risk, whilst women just react to the possibility as reality happening regardless: it's almost like having a fantasy and making it real in your head. It's even worse with women because they seem to conflate all subjective discomforts into a single crime against themselves: rape is no longer just a brutal violation, b…
/r/MensRights31/01/24 06:02 AM
7

People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones: it was not that long ago that female genitalia was ungraciously compared to the meeting of wood and a popular wood chopping instrument, but it has been quite a while since I heard that term used. It's sad that women are now doing a similar thing that they complained about men: double standards all the way.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 05:25 AM
1

Are hospitals and medical institutions allowed to sell amputated body parts or removed organs and tissues from adults for their own profit and thus encourage the practice even as far as deliberately creating a situation to harvest those tissues? If not, then why can they do that to boy's foreskins who have even less power to consent?
/r/MensRights28/01/24 01:32 AM
-28

Nimble female fingers have allowed women to gain employment outside the traditional home environment and for the first time they have been freed from needing support by a man and exchanging sex for his protection. However, child rearing still needs two parents and women are caught between a rock and a hard place in fulfilling their biological purpose and excited by freedom to think they can have it all. Women have been liberated but men are still trapped by their biological roles. Society needs …
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:26 AM
3

The entitlement involved in a member of the public interfering in a police matter and throwing hands at an officer to keep them away from her interference is incredible and yet it occurs quite matter of factly as though she has every right to do so simply because she wants to.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:24 PM
18

Casual dating is no guarantee of no obligation: baby trapping is a big hook to 18 years of obligation for 18s of pleasure.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:02 PM
9

A high sex drive doesn't correlate to body count if its expression is held hostage by women's choice and judicial suppression of breaking consent. A low sex drive doesn't correlate to body count if there are no barriers to expression (eg a large number of frustrated men lined up to service any woman open to sex any time she wants it, but not vice versa). Prostitution is not cheap assuming it is even legal in a location and wealth is often a characteristic feeding into womens choice to have sex, …
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:48 PM
1

It's not about size but visible existence of the female breast that suggests fertility and procreation at a very primitive level in mens minds, which you wouldn't get from a glimpse of Arnold Schwarzeneggers breast for example. It's why men can go topless without inciting arousal and its consequences in the hetero male population, but women can't.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 05:44 AM
1

Did they come back home with crestfallen faces to reluctantly eat those cupcakes and go to bed crying?
/r/MensRights26/01/24 03:06 AM
1

Women can masturbate with hands alone, it's just a little complicated to replicate penetration in that manner, in a similar way it is for men to be able to reach the prostate without assistance. Toys perform the same function for men and women in replicating body parts that are missing or not quite as functional as the real thing. Porn is only an arousal tool and men use it more than women because we are more visually aroused than women: it only takes an image to arouse men, whilst I think women…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:27 AM
2

Rubbish! Men have a sex drive that women don't, as a result of testosterone; both enjoy sex but only men are driven to it; women are driven more to procreation and feelings of intimacy than sex (ie many women are comfortable with cuddles as well as sex, whilst men generally are not fulfilled with cuddles). Capitalism invests in what makes profit: they haven't gone all-out on men's toys because men have a built-in toy, that is tragically compromised surgically in many cases without their consent.…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:44 AM
1

Men usually require more than visual stimulation to cum. Visual stimulation aids in arousal, but it doesn't usually trigger the sensory system that initiates the mechanics of ejaculation/orgasm: that usually requires a physical stimulus above a threshold.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:28 AM
2

Too late: retailers in the sexual market have been selling prostate stimulators for men for ages. Typical for the sex toy market to be as discriminatory about sex as the laws surrounding rape: engulfment without consent is the equivalent of penetration without consent, because its fundamentally based on consent, not the specific biological mechanism for procreation from one perspective, yet the law still remains stubbornly gynocentric as if sex is something men do to women instead of something b…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:23 AM
1

Sexual reproduction is biological and therefore primitively animalistic: human sexual organs are little different from the animals because they all perform the same biological function. Stop trying to pretend we aren't all animals at heart with a thin veneer of civilisation pasted over the top. Women don't even recognise the primitive biological things they do, like hair tossing, preening, nest building and making themselves sexually attractive to men with tight clothing that accentuates their f…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:56 AM
4

And more than the selfish attitudes of women controlling male sexual expression through monopoly access. Women can generally expect sex anytime they want: there's a queue of deprived men ready and willing to service that need, but not vice versa, where it's a woman's own wants and leveraging the "justice" system that are in control of male sexuality.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:45 AM
11

What article? All I can see is your post statement which has no supporting context.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:33 AM
1

The choice to have children and their consequences was very much their fault: it isn't like society hides the costs, but it does hype the benefits and people can be very selective in what they want to see. We don't even pass the truth to the next generation to give them the benefit of our experience, because apparently we can't allow population growth to end, despite living quite comfortably decades ago with not only a smaller population, but less technological development.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 01:01 AM
1

That's no guarantee of avoiding a false accusation, baby-trapping and a ruined life. In fact jilting a lover is likely to result in some form of revenge. I would not be surprised that in the future, ignoring women will be classified as a form of assault: can't have women not being able to manipulate men to extort something from them.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:49 AM
1

Don't follow tradition blindly and challenge the old "one perfect woman and live happily ever after" mode of life where all your eggs are in one potentially unstable and vindictive basket and at risk. Explore the fundamental things you want out of life and whether they can be more readily and safely provided independently from a greater distribution of sources. Investigate your own erotic potential (which is considerably more than most men experience) versus putting your own pleasure in the hand…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:40 AM
0

Neither accuser or accused should be identified, full stop. It's society's responsibility to ensure the guilty are punished and prevented from committing further crimes, whilst honouring human rights, not to identify the guilty so that people take their own protection into their own hands.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:28 AM
5

Raising children is effort and sacrifice, but many people have an expectation it is easy and won't impact on their previous life and that they can have everything they want without paying a price. There is a reason it takes two adults to raise a child and even then it isn't easy. I would say this woman has realised having a child is not what she thought it would be and is trying to find excuses to deflect from her own choices and their consequences. The child is probably now the center of attent…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:18 AM
3

But dropping her was what initiated the false accusation, even without a red flag. You would have to not stick your dick in women at all, or have any interaction with them, to avoid false accusations and even then I expect you would get a false accusation as retaliation for not interacting.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:23 AM
5

Courts also have "contempt of court" they could apply to false accusation as it doesn't require proof of a lie, but wasting a courts valuable time.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:16 AM
0

Really, movies and TV are not real life or intended to be a model for real life, so it scarcely matters what happens there. What is important is the entertainment industry being confused with actual education and real life. If you want to see genitalia equally, watch porn, don't expect to see it, or particularly portrayed realistically, or in an equal sense, on regular entertainment. If that is truly required, the government should be commissioning educational videos that ensure equality in expo…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 07:37 AM
1

External genitalia though are the source of identity for men, whilst for women its their reproductive organs, which is curious because the prostate is an important organ for men but its hidden and thus few sing its praise, because it is virtually unknown simply because it is hidden. The tragedy is that focusing on what is most readily apparent actually deprives men of advantages they never knew about because it isn't taught. That which is readily apparent is not necessarily the only thing of imp…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 04:27 AM
0

Womens genitalia is not normally visible, unlike mens, unless you go to abnormal lengths to show it, which would the make the program more artificial and less like the real world. It would be as bad as porn on steroids in helping educate the public about reality. If you want to see extreme genitalia in unnatural public situations, then pursue porn. The issue you are complaining about is a direct result of biological differences and whilst I would argue we need to be less concerned about nudity a…
/r/MensRights16/01/24 01:41 AM
4

Men are supposed to compete, which opens up the field to unreasonable humiliation including exposure. Unless well endowed, male actors usually don't want to expose themselves because of the potential for comparison and humiliation, hence the use of prosthetics and CGI which doesn't convey normality. I don't think men will ever get a chance at normalising nudity, except in specific naturist environments, because now there is too much subjective reaction by women who are likely to be triggered to …
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:14 AM
-2

You are not going to see much even with a full frontal of women, because they don't have visible primary genitalia, unlike with men. I think you are arguing against biological reality here. The most men get is imagination of what is hidden to excite them, whilst women don't need to imagine much when it comes to men because its all on display. Even if you presented man and woman the same, the anatomical differences mean it will inevitably be quite different. We will never achieve equality whilst …
/r/MensRights15/01/24 10:04 AM
6

Emotions run the gamut from positive to negative: women being more emotional than men, there is no reason to assume those emotions will all be positive.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:55 AM
5

If they are going to show penises, the natural fluctuation should not matter, even with continuity, as a penis can go through quite a large dimension range in a fairly short time and showing that would be natural. I fear that so many presentations restrict men's natural responses and appearances so that observers may get the wrong idea if they rely on it for education purposes. You only have to look at a photo of a natural grouping of naked men to realise the large diversity in flaccid male geni…
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:41 AM
-6

Female breasts are sexual because they incite a sexual response in men, although I doubt the reverse is true. You can't see vaginas naturally in movies because they are normally covered by the labia and not visible and the labia themselves do not extend visibly from the body normally like male genitalia, so are not as "in your face" and pronounced.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:30 AM
6

i've encountered multiple women in my life who didn't move an inch while walking in my direction only because they waited for me to move What happened to convention like "keep to the left" and introducing others like "give way to the right", to remove this from being a competition over who flinches first or feels they have some divine entitlement? Society needs to apply reason to problems via objectivity, not knee-jerk emotional impulses based on subjective feelings of entitlement.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:24 AM
2

Well, not quite: the man only has control over the man-cave to the extent that his female partner allows him that space, but he's not excluded from the rest of the house, just has no control over it. It should be about equal contribution for equal benefit and equal equity but its turned into "happy female partner, happy life" which is unbalanced.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 07:07 AM
3

It reminds me of the past expectation that a woman moving in with a man was entitled to free accommodation. Maybe not so past as relatively recently a young woman posed a question on Reddit as to whether she should pay her boyfriend rent after moving into his dwelling. The extreme past, it was common for men to protect and provide for women in exchange for sex and family, but apparently society has now moved on to equality, yet some women apparently still haven't got the memo, or they are select…
/r/MensRights13/01/24 11:49 PM
11

Men haven't been educated how to deal with the situations with women and the justice system is still bogged down in believing women, despite the lies and punishing men simply through the process of believing women and detaining men. It isn't someone's fault if they haven't been prepared, but the fault of society for not preparing them and facilitating their rights as well as those of women. Men can't protect themselves from women because of the potential for false claims being supported by the s…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 04:07 PM
3

The problem is that this doesn't happen every time and there are decent women out there, so if you just tell younger men this can happen to them without any guidance on how to identify it in advance or the level of risk or how to address it, you are just feeding the same paranoia that women experience or allowing the male inbuilt indestructability or "it won't happen to me" attitude to casually dismiss any risk.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:25 PM
1

Pranks are sometimes not jokes you can interpret differently, they can have real objective consequences to people that verge on criminal and they belong to an earlier era when we didn't care as much and tried to excuse our actions in humiliating others. I don't care that you stabbed an unarmed man for a laugh, it's still a crime against another person. Quite rightly we view revenge porn as a crime now and we should include prank porn as they both violate expectations of privacy, not to mention c…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 03:10 PM
1

Doesn't it take huevos to spit in a womans face and ignore a congressional subpoena, knowing the possible consequences?
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:56 PM
1

Sexuality is such a huge thing in peoples lives, we should really start to identify our intentions openly, without shame, such as wearing a large badge that says "single and looking", "married and not looking to change, but open to friendly banter", etc to make it easier to target appropriate people. Sadly we aren't mind readers. I'm sure slipping in the SO late in the piece is when someone decides you are just not their type after a promising start, so the talk is interpreted as friendly only.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:44 PM
1

Why don't men already have assistance in developing friendships with other men? It's really left to chance encounters at work or other groupings of people where you can't determine potential candidates at first sight and it takes a lot of filtering effort. In fact the focus is mainly on just sexual relationships (in the broadest sense) in the app realm, probably because sex sells. It would be great if the online interest groups facilitated offline contact based on people's perceptions of contrib…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:29 PM
3

You can't reason with subjective emotional impulse: the only option is to withdraw your presence and labour from the environment and give the reason why, once that is done, and hope they take it on-board for the next male schmuck.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 01:28 PM
7

Pushback happened initially, but women played the anti-discrimination card as if it was not right in any circumstance, when human beings discriminate at a personal level all the time and its not frowned upon. However they made sure that women had an exception to the anti-discrimination push because of their personal "safety" being put at risk (a man they weren't attracted to might look at them in a way they didn't like and that just could not be allowed). So we now have women only spaces for the…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 01:22 PM
14

What about the girlie posters in mens lockers? Can't have that with women in the vicinity, taking attention away from the women, even if they never considered giving anything back and even though women wouldn't get to see them.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 01:07 PM
12

Anything not catering to a woman is perceived as a resource taken from that woman and impoverishing her (ie victimisation) when it was never hers in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 01:03 PM
33

Women make a house theirs too, where it has to be their space for their needs and not for the man, even though he shares it supposedly equally: if he's fortunate she allows him a small man-cave carved out of the space. It's like everything has to revolve around the woman as the centre of the universe. Lets not mention the unreasonable demand to put the toilet seat down, when a woman can do that herself if it isn't to her liking. Maybe its not surprising as an unconscious expression of nest build…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 12:58 PM
2

Women shaming men in that way will just drive them further away towards what they can achieve. If a woman can freely use a sex toy because she don't need a man for that, what does she need a man for and what happens when men no longer feel like giving women that when women won't reciprocate for what men want? Women are going to create a divided society with both not getting what they really want and all because of what, some fantasy that only Brad Pitt is good enough for all of them? Well, I hav…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:36 AM
5

Has everyone forgotten about the power of fantasy and imagining someone else in place of the person you are currently intimate with? If men can do that with women (eg imagining Marilyn Monroe), then surely they could extend that to a construct, assuming the construct simulated reality closely enough. If you can't obtain the ideal, surely good enough is better than nothing, depression and suicide. The sad part is that women are rejecting perfectly serviceable men for relationships to pursue some …
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:33 AM
3

What's the real difference between a woman pretending to like you for what you can give her and an AI (apart from physical stuff)? They are both pretending. I think its sad there aren't any other perceived acceptable alternatives to men for intimacy than artificial constructs. If men can have intimacy with women, then why can't they also develop intimacy with other men, or a combination of sources for each particular aspect that source best and most readily provides? Does it really all have to b…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 10:18 AM
6

It's obviously not an innate male response as the other soldier does not protect the other woman in any similar way, so either that particular soldier is exceptionally protective or else the woman means something to him that he would protect above his own safety. However, I notice the woman getting away from the situation as quickly as possible, only concerned for her own safety and maybe worried about the man's intentions.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 04:29 AM
3

I don't think we should discount "falling in love" because nature has a way of keeping men and women together long enough for procreation to be successful by drugging them. I think this drugged period is likely 7 years in which case offspring are outside the most dangerous period and easier to look after. However, I don't think all men and women are having relationships whilst in love and therefore are missing that drug to keep them together: I think most are having relationships for sex and the…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 04:22 AM
6

I strongly believe that tying sex to procreation is a mistake. Apart from the sex required to procreate, procreation is about the child, so perhaps we need to focus on an equal informed consent contract to support child rearing, which can't be broken except under the most extreme circumstances, with otherwise sex and life outside child raising being flexible for both partners but outside the childhood home so it doesn't impact the child.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 03:55 AM
1

Whilst recognition of this issue is welcome, it's not going to do anything about prevention because it's all after-the-fact, once the damage has been done. Trying to prevent an emotional impulse in a person who is unable to moderate their emotional impulses with reason, is almost impossible, and punishment for a crime is not a deterrent to an emotionally driven person, because a deterrent requires reason that the punishment is worse than the crime and you just don't get reason in the throes of a…
/r/MensRights11/01/24 03:35 AM
1

That frozen sperm case is a curious one: whilst it could be argued the man intended to have the option for children and thus the intention, hence the frozen sperm, I don't see how it can be argued that it was with the express intent of having them with this particular person, especially when this person is now an ex. Unless the argument was along shared property lines during a divorce, except frozen sperm is not shared property, else you could argue the same with other body tissues (I'll have bo…
/r/MensRights10/01/24 06:46 AM
2

The theft aspect is only one element of the situation and in practice, gifts tend to have to be identified somewhere in the chain, especially when it comes to money and often particularly when it comes to politicians and corruption, so I would argue that gifts often have to be proven. Similarly, society accepts a woman's accusation as proof enough to start procedures against a man for alleged grievance, whereas they are not so ready vice versa, because women are privileged by biased concepts of …
/r/MensRights10/01/24 01:42 AM
2

I disagree with the artificial womb idea and prefer we pursue the equivalent of "intellectual property rights": sperm is part of a man's body and no-one should have a right to the use of that sperm except the man, or with his explicit consent. A woman using a mans sperm to create a baby is using genetic material that does not intrinsicly belong to her. If someone drops their wallet in the street, anyone picking it up and using the money inside it is technically committing theft unless the owner …
/r/MensRights09/01/24 02:22 PM
2

I think women were conned into believing they were super-beings and could have it all, when nature requires more human effort than one woman can provide to properly raise children; and men were conned into believing it would be happy ever after when in reality they would be held hostage to a woman's wants and happiness. Whilst government continues to allow women to rape men of their resources through divorce without offering anything in return, and thus are able to achieve more than their own re…
/r/MensRights04/01/24 04:08 AM
4

I once read an article about a government that were considering making a one-night-stand a legal relationship. Whilst it didn't get adopted, they are considering these things, so its just a matter of time. Men can still be held accountable in some jurisdictions for a one-night-stand if conception results, even if it isn't his, and an alleged pregnancy can be used to coerce men. We need bodily sovereignty rights, including tissues, as soon as possible, so that men own the exclusive rights to the …
/r/MensRights03/01/24 02:18 PM
15

However, the reason it is happening now like it is, is because of complaints that women were not coming forward for actual crimes because they weren't believed and were traumatised further by the attempts to verify the accusations which caused them to relive the incident. By respecting womens subjective feelings more than those of men, they can't as easily verify the veracity of the allegations. This is women getting favourable treatment because they are seen to be more emotionally vulnerable th…
/r/MensRights03/01/24 01:56 PM
20

Sadly, sexual or violence accusations are crimes and go through the justice system with the state taking on the case for prosecution on behalf of the alleged victim, whilst suing for defamation is a civil matter for which you have to pay for court costs and is only for the well heeled. The justice system is quite slow and meanwhile fallout from as yet unproven accusations punish the accused even if they are innocent. In principle, the state should not take on cases for prosecution purely from al…
/r/MensRights03/01/24 01:44 PM
2

Isn't it more likely a woman changes her mind after marriage, after being interested in having children at the start to not wanting children for various reasons? Whilst this is perfectly fine and in an ideal world a man who wanted kids would just part ways through irreconcilable differences, but we don't live in an ideal world and a woman can take part of the wealth of a couple on divorce, which may just keep a man hostage in the relationship, especially if this happens after a number of years a…
/r/MensRights03/01/24 01:21 PM
2

Versus spewing criticisms and disappointment masquerading as "truth". We are talking about male pleasure at the forefront here, not dependent on the needs and wants of anyone else, not held hostage to the needs and wants of anyone else and not impacting on other people. This does not exclude men also choosing to meet the needs of other people as well as himself, however his own needs must be primary for a change instead of always revolving around a woman's.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 11:13 PM
2

I think it is important for a man not to be dependent on someone else when it comes to obtaining sexual fulfilment. Intimacy is a different case because it depends on another person, but even there, it's possible for men to have their needs for intimacy fulfilled with each other instead of with women, we just aren't used to engaging in that way.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:29 AM
2

It's the slow grinding of the wheels of justice that is itself being used to punish men on accusation than the accusation itself, and thus provide women with revenge for perceived slights. In my opinion, the justice system is collaborating in revenge by depriving men of freedom through its own processes when the accused is supposed to be deemed innocent until proven guilty, but is punished as though guilty through incarceration, bail and allowing employers to stand men down or otherwise punish t…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 03:05 AM
1

More money will not necessarily translate to greater happiness for women or less happiness for men with less to spend.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:53 AM
2

I believe more men will turn to other men for sex and friendship and never underestimate a man's creativity in obtaining sexual pleasure, so there will eventually be more realistic substitutes for women including AI saying what a man wants to hear. Whilst homophobia still stands in the way, I think its power is weakening as men realise what they do with their bodies is not feminine and if it's a case of sticking to sexual orientation and less pleasure because women are less readily available, or…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:44 AM
2

Not many men experience prostate orgasms immediately, it usually takes some training and some men take a long time to achieve them, whilst others never manage to achieve the holy grail due to distractions such as pain, even if they are motivated. It doesn't help that traditional penile triggered orgasms are easy for most men to achieve, so something that takes effort and is initially based on subtle sensations versus a strangle-hold, can take some getting used to. The video may be deceptive in n…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:08 AM
8

If women don't owe men sex, then men don't owe women orgasms: men can assist a woman to orgasm but it's ultimately her responsibility. Women are more naturally multi-orgasmic than men, so did the statistics count individual orgasms or all those in a single session as one?
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:22 AM
1

Is it possible the child no longer has needs for support, including being unfortunately deceased?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 04:44 AM
2

What was wrong with the Amber Alert that covered all missing children without bias? Even if one group made up 90% of the statistics, by creating an alert just for that group is ignoring the rest of the victims and is discrimination.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 04:37 AM
1

What does granting a divorce do though? In Australia, divorce still means child support, but is effectively a defacto alimony and child support as part of the money is siphoned off to pay for the ex-wife's lifestyle too as they can't be separated. Whilst the cricketer may no longer be liable to pay for his wife's children by another man, he will surely be liable to pay child support for his own child with this woman (assuming it is even his own child). At least in Australia, divorce is a woman's…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 04:01 AM
0

Paper abortions are the wrong solution to the problem. Society has embraced consent, but only as it applies to women: it needs to be extended as a general principle, which will include the consent of men to the use of their sperm. Women largely have consent over their own bodies through contraception, termination and consent laws: "my body, my choice" also needs to include "my responsibility" and needs to be provided equally to men as well, as it relates to their own bodies. What is being ignore…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:07 AM
1

It's likely the law would view an NDA as potentially being made under duress. Recordings are likely to be inadmissible if they were taken without permission of the other party, to preserve their privacy. Inviting a woman to your place of residence is a telltale of your income and status as most people live up to their wealth: you don't need to tell her for her to get the gist. As for 2. above. Public cameras used by police however would likely be admissible evidence, so it would help if the fron…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:07 AM
1

Was the woman raped, even if another man's DNA was discovered at the scene of the allegation? No, she was only allegedly raped as even that other man must be seen as innocent until proven guilty via due process. This is not only up to the police: the alleged victim would have surely had to identify her attacker, or is it now legal to accuse anyone in the vicinity just to have vengeance and statistics satisfied?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:21 AM
8

Isn't that gaslighting of men to say it is their mistake that a woman takes advantage of them as a minor? That is not a male minor's mistake as they can't legally consent to sex with an older woman because of their age: it's rape of a minor if you apply the law equally as it should be.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 11:52 PM
1

However you are not alone with pets to keep you company. If by alone you mean "no human presence", then perhaps you need to specify that. You highlight that it is possible to experience important life outcomes without a woman providing them and men should take the time to identify the individual outcomes they want in life and consider how they might be individually met some other way than with one woman. Putting all your eggs in one basket has always been risky.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:33 PM
2

One perfect woman is not the only option for connection, company, intimacy or sex and especially in this online world, no reason to be lonely: men need to adjust their expectations and diversify instead of being held hostage to conditioned monopoly.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 11:30 PM
1

You have morals, women have an agenda that doesn't include morals only checklists: men are simply disposable assets in achieving that agenda, useful whilst they are useful. It's testament to the entrenched ideology in society that you ask about dating as though it is some kind of natural development, when its simply the way men and women formed a relationship of mutual benefit in the past: today everything is under the control of women, because women have been elevated to the position of a prote…
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:59 AM
6

Remember, fundamental human drives are a result of biology and human intelligence is only an extra overlay over that biology that moderates but does not erase or suppress that biology. Question your urges as much as you like, but they ain't going nowhere, so that leaves questioning society's response to them and if you can't change society, you have to find a way to live your life that honours the fundamental urges but satisfies them in other, legal, more easily obtained ways. Those fundamental …
/r/MensRights11/12/23 10:09 AM
2

Not when you were told the oven was switched off and you have the option of terminating the baking process by disconnecting the oven soon after it has started to warm, so the ingredients never get a chance to create the outcome of a cake. Men generally consent to sex, not procreation, so breaking consent should be technically rape because its using a man's body (hard labour for child support for 20 years) for a woman's benefit that he didn't consent to.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 09:06 AM
1

Unfortunately women make up 50% of the population, have in-group bias and a sizeable portion of men are simps, so women and women sympathisers have the majority and the system is not going to change. I think it is going to take the system crashing into anarchy for women to beg to have the old ways back, because anarchy, as in war, is not kind to women.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 07:38 AM
2

Adam and Eve are going to be cast out of the Garden of Eden yet again, metaphorically speaking, because of Eve's character flaws. Unfortunately power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 07:34 AM
6

Two wrongs don't make a right. Calling out double standards and hypocrisy won't work because women don't operate on reason and these two things are rational perspectives. Women live in another dimension to men and will not accept reason even if it is an obvious nail in their head. Do women really want men to pretend they understand "it's not about the nail" when they don't?
/r/MensRights03/12/23 01:07 PM
1

she- you have heard of the "wage gap" me - you mean the income discrepancy because women choose to work less hours at jobs that pay less per hour?
/r/MensRights03/12/23 09:08 AM
2

I once came across an article about a country toying with the idea that even a one-night-stand should be considered cohabitation and a relationship. The world is definitely moving closer to that perspective.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 07:40 AM
9

It's all in the name: feminism has always been about the advantage of women; sometimes it makes sense to give women a temporary advantage to achieve an agreed measure of equality if women are disadvantaged, but always advantaging women goes beyond equality in many situations. Now that women have equality in college/university because of quotas and other mechanisms, that temporary advantage has not been wound back and subsequently we have inequality again, but men are now disadvantaged. Heads I w…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 06:55 AM
2

Which is why society desperately needs the right of bodily sovereignty, including tissues, to make it a crime to use someone's tissues without their explicit consent. In the case of men, it would make the use of his sperm to create a child illegal without his consent, no matter how it was obtained and destroy the potential for baby-trapping overnight. It's already done for surgical tissue removal or cadaver tissues and this would just bring it into line for all tissues, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 06:43 AM
0

Biology is a powerful force though with women at its focus for men: if we want all the benefits that unfortunately come with downsides, it's difficult to avoid women. However, that is the primitive programming at work and human beings also have the ability to reach for higher order outcomes through reason, so there is the potential for men to break the biological monopoly, but it has been entrenched for so long, with taboo, prohibition and tradition, it is difficult to believe anything else exis…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 02:33 AM
1

There's a child developmental stage called "theory of mind" I understand, where the child realises the world is not an extension of themselves but completely separate and other people have their own experiences and knowledge that the child is not privy to and vice versa. I'm starting to believe that many women do not successfully navigate that development stage and continue to believe they are the center of the universe and it an extension of them.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 02:20 AM
1

It's not about the nail. As a man I still have difficulty trying to see from that perspective, since all I can see is the nail causing the problem in the first place and I want to yank it out to fix it: it's all about the nail as the primary cause.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 02:06 AM
6

Extortion in the rest of society is supposed to be a crime, yet some women seem to be turning it into an artform.
/r/MensRights03/12/23 01:55 AM
6

Rape is fundamentally the breaking of consent for sexual activity, including where no consent is sought: it should not rely on the particular mechanism of sexual activity involved (engulfment is the opposite perspective of penetration for example).
/r/MensRights03/12/23 01:19 AM
0

Lets be honest here, society protects females because they are the biological keystone of procreation and female "innocence" is about the consequences of sex to them in this regard. Males do not have the same personal consequences to sex and have an additional male sex drive motivated by testosterone and are thus enthusiastic about sex without limits and do not really have the same "innocence". Males and females are very different biologically and I disagree with treating them identically as one…
/r/MensRights26/11/23 02:44 AM
1

That is only one perspective of many. Men are stoic because they play a biological role that has not fundamentally changed: they are still required to protect women and children and those women and children are not now suddenly protecting themselves. Until society replaces the functions of men, those men are required to suppress their fear, their disgust, their emotions in order to do the jobs that women won't. I do not expect women will ever change to want to do those jobs. Men are required to …
/r/MensRights25/11/23 02:51 AM
1

Women only have the power to consent to sex through the intervention of laws and punishment by society, as a deterrent to men taking what they want by greater strength. Biology however encourages women to select one man to be her provider and protector against other men, in exchange for accepting his sexual requirements. Men have always had a greater biological power dynamic that re-asserts itself during times of societal disruption: it's fundamental, whereas society is fickle and fluctuates. Th…
/r/MensRights25/11/23 02:24 AM
0

I introduce a comment for discussion and you immediately jump to emotional strawmanning, abuse and gaslighting. Perhaps we can have a reasonable discussion when you are less hysterical.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 12:29 AM
0

Don't males have a greater power dynamic than females when it comes to sexuality? Consequently young inexperienced people together will be subject to a power dynamic regardless and will have the disadvantage that it is all trial and error and the blind leading the blind generation after generation, with no transfer of experience. You talk about grooming, but isn't sexuality itself grooming? Young men are trying to encourage women to have sex with them: men pursue women, not vice versa. I agree i…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 12:25 AM
1

Your entire view of your self changes, especially your ability to be a good father one day. Thoughts like "if i can't protect myself, how will I protect my wife one day or my kids" and those are very painful to endure. Whilst there are biological roots in male provision and protection, society doesn't offer any other options for men that might be a lifeline when the ability to provide or protect is compromised in extinguishing that outlet. All a man's eggs seem to be in one basket, which is risk…
/r/MensRights23/11/23 12:08 AM
2

From a biological perspective, women have had a raw deal being forced to have sex by man's greater strength and experiencing the consequences, even though it is offset by desiring children and enjoying sex, and as a result of being aware of higher order elements beyond biology: the animals tend to accept their life is as it is, even if they want some elements to be different, because they don't have awareness. Millennia of experiencing a raw deal has to imprint itself in a woman's structure, lik…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:51 AM
1

Even the Christians are only doing good deeds to get into heaven and avoid hell: it's still fundamentally done for selfish reasons.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:33 AM
1

Society deliberately keeps the majority in a stressful enough situation that the people are too busy keeping themselves afloat to have much left over to help others.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 05:00 AM
1

Fundamentally, people are conditioned to be selfish by society, although women already have an in-built in-group bias that counteracts it somewhat. It takes considerable civilisation advancement to work against this selfishness: even millennia of religion has had little impact despite one of the fundamental messages being "do unto others as you would have others do unto you". Unfortunately capitalism is based on greed, advantage and selfishness, which keeps re-inforcing human vices.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 04:58 AM
1

Men are compelled to compete within capitalist societies, whilst women are now being given a leg up to obtain the objective without having to compete through quotas and positive discrimination. Historically, men have always had to compete, especially for women, whilst women didn't have to do anything except choose from among the many suitors and be looked after. It's not in men's conditioning to seek support or help, but to be a provider to women and compete with other men for them. Even the sim…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 04:49 AM
1

Does anyone think Adam & Eve being expelled from the Garden of Eden because of Eve's actions was a once-off?
/r/MensRights22/11/23 04:34 AM
-2

Why do people insist that men having sex with men is gay? I think this is why it is not seen as attractive, because it is associated with being feminine, when its not: only a percentage of gay men exhibit feminine characteristics. What men do with men is inherently male. Men who have sex with men and with women are not gay but are called bisexual. If a man would rather have sex with a woman but is not able to achieve that and instead chooses to explore sex with men would also be bisexual, not ga…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 04:27 AM
-2

Sex between men is as gay as a tennis match between men. No-one is forcing you to engage in sex with men, I mention it only as a possible option if men are unable to gain access to sex with their preferred women. Many men still struggle with entrenched homophobia engineered by society: I'm asking you to challenge that homophobia, not demanding you have sex with men. This is not reverse conversion therapy, just suggestions to consider from a position of reason, instead of suicide, if you struggle…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 04:11 AM
5

Impressive. I think when a man is being emasculated in this way, the only shred of masculinity left is bravado by passing it off as a joke: he can take it by joking about it or laughing with those who make it a joke, as though it doesn't matter, whilst he is crying inside. Masculinity and femininity are the byproducts of biological roles in sexual reproduction: men and women are specialised in their particular roles, encoded in our genes and this will never fundamentally change whilst our genes …
/r/MensRights22/11/23 02:42 AM
3

The biological purpose of life is reproduction and continuation of the species, however human beings are able to reach for higher order things, but they will always be rooted in that biology.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 01:14 AM
5

It takes two to tango, which means the requirements of both sides for that to happen must be taken into account. The reality that womens requirements are much greater than mens, means men are essentially held hostage to what women want. At a purely biological level, women are disadvantaged in that they can't realistically say no to sex and carry the consequences, however nature has mitigated that disadvantage somewhat by allowing a woman to choose one man and to exchange sex for being provided f…
/r/MensRights22/11/23 01:08 AM
2

If she was stressed before with 2 toddlers and a new baby and the OP was helping out, what is it going to be like with her trying to cope alone with the OP living somewhere else temporarily? I think she needs to stay with her parents or relatives that can provide support, or vice versa, if the OP can't live with the rest of the family for a while. That might also give someone else the ability to be a witness to her behaviour as well. Society says the interests of the child are paramount, so star…
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:03 PM
2

Women should at least be aware of the risk that sex might be on the agenda in this situation, or are women these days completely uneducated about men? I can't accept this based on historical comments that men seem only to be after one thing, so I can only put it down to denial so that women are seen as victims instead of part of biology. It's as if women believe that sexuality should only revolve about their own needs and wants and that men's wants and needs don't exist.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 12:20 AM
12

He should never have been suspended on allegation only, if we believe in the principle of innocent until proven guilty and due process. The High Courts recent decision to overturn the indefinite detention of illegal immigrants, on the basis that it was a punishment imposed by government, when punishment is the province of the justice system, will have, I believe, far reaching consequences in the elimination of the shadow justice system that sees people in authority act as judge, jury and executi…
/r/MensRights17/11/23 05:53 AM
1

I've heard about "citizens arrest", but "citizens strip search" is a bridge too far. However, people can be very gullible when following the guidance of those they believe to be in authority.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 01:05 PM
1

Unfortunately not: they just import skilled migrants to do the grunt work. I feel like I am living at a time when all Star Trek themes are becoming a reality.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:58 PM
1

Equality doesn't necessarily even mean raising both up to a higher level, it can be bringing someone down to a level that you thought you experienced, as revenge, whilst you advantage yourself.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:52 PM
1

You realise of course, that Star Trek played with the idea of the creation of a warp bomb instead of warp drive and this is the more likely scenario for our state of civilisation: there is precedent in our history with nuclear energy and space flight which were both driven largely by nations seeking aggressive military advantage ahead of ploughshares.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:48 PM
1

Men aren't even valued, they are utilised for what they can provide and then discarded. The compatibility between men and women must be normally pretty bad if even nature has to drug men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful, even when sex is pleasurable. I'm not convinced most men and women are entering into relationships "in love" (ie drugged), but in lust with what the idea of relationship offers them individually. It's no wonder many struggle to get along un…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:16 PM
3

Once a woman has the children she wants, she can leverage the courts to still provide resources whilst she divorces the man and no longer has to put up with meeting his requirements for marriage. Hell, in some cases she doesn't need more than a one-night stand for sperm donation if she can coerce signing him up as the Father so she can go after his resources. Men are at a disadvantage over choice, since they are usually the ones more desperate as a result of women being more selective. Women des…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:22 PM
0

It helps to explore your own erotic potential and having no issue about men having sex with men opens up more options that are not so difficult to achieve: most men haven't considered anything outside the traditional box (sic) because that is all that society pushes men to. I meant there is nothing we can do about women's attitudes because they are legally and completely under the control of women only: you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink. I am hopeful that more men will …
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:08 PM
3

Women don't have problems dating because there is a line a mile long of men just waiting for a chance: what they might have is such high expectations that the line gets whittled down to one or none, but its not because of the choice of men. Men are completely held hostage to the expectations of women and there is nothing they can legally do about it. I believe men have a much greater sex drive than women, except when both are trying for a child, but society refuses to see it. It means that women…
/r/MensRights01/11/23 12:56 PM
10

It's not a fair deal to women who believe they deserve it all without any sacrifice: a career as well as children and keeping up with the Joneses and the same income as men despite working in lower pay fields and for less hours.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 12:15 PM
2

Blacks are already considered a victimised minority by history and so have an elevated platform. Who thinks about men being victims of anything when its always women most affected and the experiences of men drowned out? If men did fight harder against circumcision, women would fight harder that it looks neater to them, etc and they are most affected by the status quo being changed.
/r/MensRights30/10/23 02:59 AM
5

Women don't owe men sex, but men owe women orgasms? I don't think so. Even with something like erectile dysfunction or premature ejaculation, it seems women most affected, especially with PE having a basis of not being long enough to provide satisfaction to a partner: there is no concern about the man in this only the impact on the woman. There are tools that can be used to help a woman achieve orgasm: it doesn't have to be via a penis of a particular size or shape. If she can be helped to orgas…
/r/MensRights30/10/23 02:34 AM
1

This is a real problem in the differences between men and women, because biology doesn't care about feelings, only procreation. If we posit human beings reach for more advanced outcomes than simply biology driven, such as choice over sex, then that can't simply apply to one sex for its advantage without also advantaging the other to maintain equality and offset the disadvantage imposed on the other sex. Giving women choice over sex disadvantages men in now being held hostage in their own require…
/r/MensRights24/10/23 05:40 AM
1

You misunderstand: the 80/20 ratio relates to the selection of men women consider suitable for their needs in a relationship. Increasingly, mate selection is a woman's choice with men not really having a say if they want to have a relationship. Casual sex is a different thing and yet there still, it is all women's choice because they are the focal point of consent and the gatekeepers, even though it is men who pursue them. Few men would say no when a woman chooses them, because men don't get as …
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:07 AM
2

The problem could be substantially reduced by transfering education online and not forcing people into groups in specific buildings, whilst mandating education classes on human anatomy and relationships in which these subjects are explained clearly to both sexes.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:25 AM
3

If law and the society that supports it is unfairly on the side of women, the only power you have is to withold your labour, but that would require leaving that society and starting anew somewhere that society has no jurisdiction. When I say anew, I mean not repeating the same life all over again, but finding new ways to meet your fundamental needs that doesn't place you in hostage to a woman and an unfair society again. If only women and society were reasonable and provided 50% access for 50% s…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:11 AM
2

No need to become a monk: sex is largely about pleasurable sensation, not procreation and those sensations are experienced by your body, somewhat independent of who or what is providing that stimulation. When you masturbate, its stimulating male body parts with male body parts (or other things) and you aren't going "yuck" and simply enduring it, laying back and thinking of England. It's also likely including some sort of fantasisation and substitution. Men have to break free of the straight-jack…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:56 AM
7

Anything a woman feels subjectively uncomfortable about is being criminalised: even averting your eyes or crossing the street to avoid a woman could be criminalised. Hell, even allegations are punitive, even if they don't proceed to criminal conclusion.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:46 AM
18

That's not really going to help: women are selecting for the most attractive men, so getting a six pack and physical definition is only going to advantage you against men who don't, you will still be competing on other measures of attractiveness such as height and handsomeness that are largely outside your control. Men can't take control over something that is controlled by another person, especially when that person is fickle.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:40 AM
3

Andropause is the male equivalent of menopause. The problem is that health services are always constrained, so there will be a limited amount of funding available and this should be rightly equally divided between men and women. Just because male health was not recognised as much as womens health in the past doesn't mean it should remain that way. Unfortunately it also means that womens proportion of funding has to reduce to compensate, but feminism has argued quite strongly for equality, so the…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:30 AM
-2

The male sex drive is real and different from that of women because it is based on the biology of sexual reproduction. Women have the biological consequence of conception, pregnancy, birth and child rearing as a result of sex to consider, to counter their own sex drive, which men do not. Sexual expression is rampant between most homosexual men, yet tends to reduce b alletween homosexual women because of the differences in sex drive. It is this refusal to accept the differences between men and wo…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 01:20 AM
4

The OP is not abandoning their children, they are being forcibly evicted from their presence. If the ex wants to take full responsibility, then let it be so and make it known it is their doing. Find a different path in life forward, learning from the mistakes of the past. If the OP died of natural causes, the result would be similar, so its not their fault however they are removed from the scene and children are resilliant in order to survive.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:25 AM
1

Biology and sexual reproduction roles.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:04 AM
2

Women have to deal with pre-verbal infants, so they biologically need to be more in tune with emotions. Men are biologically designed to be protector and provider, freeing women up to concentrate on child rearing. It becomes problematic when you try to change the task the programming is most geared to, although human beings have some plasticity in changing roles. Men are not women and that is okay, because we are still based on the same biology and fundamental roles as we were at the dawn of hum…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:03 AM
1

Courage is about feeling emotions but doing it anyway. You don't hear about women having courage, only men. Men have always been the protectors and providers and so have needed some way to deal with their natural emotions that inevitably surface in pursuit of that role: whether they ignore or suppress their emotions, they are still expected to "be that man" to protect and provide. Who is it who is usually expected to investigate a noise a woman hears, or to dispose of a potentially threatening c…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 01:49 AM
3

It depends how you define harassment, assault and rape: it's possible to make the bar so low that a woman feeling subjectively uncomfortable, for any reason, in the presence of a man, could be construed as at least one of those instances. What about the natural pursuit of sex, which by tradition requires men to pursue women? If a woman doesn't even want to be approached, she can call it harassment, despite the man not knowing if she wants it or not until after the fact. Then women feign surprise…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 12:52 AM
3

Women are considered more important people to society because historically and biologically they are the bottleneck to survival. Even though it no longer holds true with our huge populations and better technical care of women during pregnancy and childbirth, it's a pervasive tradition that just won't let go. Consequently, women are privileged and as other people have mentioned, any reduction in privilege is perceived as oppression. Therefore, any attempt to make men and women equal means a reduc…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 12:31 AM
1

It's for the same reason as correlation isn't necessarily causation. It's kind of understandable though: women have always largely been protected by men in society against egregious sexual opportunity, by her choosing a single man to have his way with her (and she with him) who protects his access to sex from other men and provides her with what she needs in exchange; but now women want everything without paying any price and have effectively rejected mens protection for complete independence; c…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 12:54 AM
7

Based on the comments in the referenced article, it sounds like Masters & Johnson were more focused on the mystery of the female orgasm as if the male orgasm was already completely understood. Males hate this machine is a comment about performance, however I think it highlights a primitive perspective about sex. Sex is fundamentally about pleasurable feelings, despite being about procreation: deliberate procreation is only a miniscule part of sexual activity. Consequently, when you look at sex f…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 02:30 PM
1

I think you have to reduce the household to money: what it costs to get someone in to do the jobs you would normally do, what the bills cost, what the equipment costs, mortgage, etc and then halve it and apportion half to each person to pay. If either person doesn't want to pay, or can't afford to pay for their half, they can do that portion of the work themself. In that way, the effort is given a value and is divided equally. This is more of a paper exercise to demonstrate a point of equally sh…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 01:48 PM
9

Feminism hasn't freed men from forced marriages, kids and obligations: there are increasing reports of baby-trapping, women claiming paternity after a one night stand or even sexual assault, whilst resistance to paternity tests is increasing. Women have considerable leverage in using pregnancy or alleged pregnancy as a weapon to extort and coerce.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 01:22 PM
7

The next minute the police rock up, because she phoned them to complain a man was being creepy and she feared for her safety, so the man now becomes allegedly guilty until he proves himself innocent, whilst the woman can claim she was mistaken and suffers no consequence for her paranoia. Society has yet to discuss the reality of biology and natural sex drive expression and its conflict with a woman's perceived right to be insulated from it if she is not attracted to the person. If men aren't eve…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:58 PM
3

I think the problem is women and their particular biology that results in them being more susceptible to paranoia, through their greater emotionality, than men who have greater reasoning ability. They see potential danger in everything, instead of performing a reasoned risk analysis. This then filters down to men who are answerable to womens concerns, because their livelihood or relationship or personal benefit depends on it. That anecdote of the beach activity was not the man doing due diligenc…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 12:52 PM
12

How does planning on getting pregnant reduce your ability to do a job you were hired for? Perhaps I could complain that my swimmers don't get the required support working outside in the heat if I'm planning on (us) getting pregnant. Women becoming pregnant and causing issues for a business is why they weren't employed in the past: businesses are not social services for women, but seem to be forced in that direction whilst men are left out in the cold (or the heat as may be).
/r/MensRights22/09/23 06:23 AM
1

Only a tiny fraction of the population commits crime and yet it is such a huge deal in society that we have a large and expensive justice system to deal with it. It doesn't take many people to cause a problem in society, so saying "not all men" or "not all women" actually doesn't reduce the problem at all or make it okay. Most people don't come across that many others, so from the perspective of someone who feels they have been treated badly, it can seem like all men or all women (that they have…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 06:01 AM
5

Domestic Violence is a crime I understand. To then include a matter of justice, protected by due process and a presumption of innocence, in an essentially civil matter where none of the protections of justice exists, seems perverse, especially as the domestic violence is likely to be an allegation, or a low bar to criminality.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:59 AM
2

The rise of single men is due to women's extreme selectivity in rejecting them as partners. However, whilst it is not womens responsibility to fix, because personal choice is permitted, it becomes women's problem if they want a partner, as they are now competing with every other selective woman from a much smaller pool of men; and that problem will not simply rectify itself, so basically women do have to fix it if they want a partner, by being less selective. If they choose not to do anything ab…
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:24 AM
-5

To be fair, child support includes food, clothing, shelter, education and associated items for keeping up with the Joneses children. This implicitly includes items used in support of those functions, so half of a house, fridge, TV, washing machine, etc. It should not include the entire costs of any of those items, however it is vulnerable to manipulation by the other parent saying they can't afford their half and thus the man has to front most of it so the child continues to receive those items.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 07:15 AM
1

No, it's not: the only reasonable solution is to increase revenue to fund equality in expenditure on health for men and women, as it is for any area of inequality, if equality is the objective. Government can be very wasteful, hanging onto outdated mechanisms and perspectives that are inefficient for ideological reasons. There is no advantage in fragmenting welfare into so many causal categories of disadvantage when they all have a common need for a livable income in a modern society; or having …
/r/MensRights03/09/23 01:06 AM
1

Nature drugs men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful. It doesn't sound like many men and women are entering relationships "in love" and so are not being dulled over the inevitable frictions between essentially fundamentally different people.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 04:59 AM
4

And be very careful you aren't baby-trapped on exit or falsely accused of a sexual crime as revenge.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 04:56 AM
2

You could start by not simply touting the feminist line that male sexual biology is creepy, without challenge, right at the start, especially if you want to make male friends and not simply exclude most of them because they are fundamentally creepy. Why are you "obviously not a woman"? Your comments right from the start had me feeling you were behaving like a woman complaining about men.
/r/MensRights29/08/23 08:37 AM
0

Why are men expressing their biological sexual natures creeps? That's a womans perspective. It's a reality that males pursue females for sex and its also a statistical reality that if females reject sex with men, then there are more males pursuing sex than females and thus the pursuit load on each of those females increases. The more females as a whole reject sex, the more pressure to have sex on the remaining females. What we are really talking about here though is womens discomfort with being …
/r/MensRights29/08/23 08:33 AM
1

Funding is always limited, however the disparity between men and womens health funding is so entrenched that were men to agitate for more, it would likely be taken from women and although that would achieve equality, women would perceive it as a loss. I'm not sure there is a solution, unless womens health is wasting some of their funding that could be saved and spent effectively on men instead. To ensure mens health funding matches womens means money has to be taken from elsewhere in the budget,…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 07:42 AM
8

For women though, a rejection destroys their dream of the happy ever after fantasy life, so it feels like a much bigger blow than for a man who is mainly looking for sex and doesn't have a ticking time bomb over children. Then there is the inherently greater emotionality and less reason of women compared to men, which pursues primitive emotional impulsive responses ahead of reason. This is not the fault of either men or women as we had no say in our biology, but we have to deal with it realistic…
/r/MensRights26/08/23 02:10 AM
1

I believe there are often charges for banks to hand over account information to third parties, so don't make it easy on the ex.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:18 AM
2

And the statistics for subsequent divorces are even higher than first time divorces.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:15 AM
8

Don't fall for the "sex for old times sake" routine either, no matter how tempting it is, because it is more than likely to be an attempt to baby-trap and/or cuckold.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:14 AM
1

Be incredibly glad you aren't in a country with common law relationships, where you are assumed to be defacto married if you have been cohabiting for 2 years, 1 year, 6 months, etc depending on the location.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:12 AM
13

Unless the ex is looking for alimony, searching financial resources could mean she is keeping a pregnancy from the OP or intending to become pregnant to use as a child support card, whether or not it is the OP's, and is scouting out financial support possibilities. Men need to be very careful in advance, as women plan these things out in advance but what the guy sees is only the tip of the iceberg until it rams into him. Where there is smoke there is usually fire smouldering below.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 07:09 AM
4

Wouldn't you be intimidated by the artificial plastic android look when you are searching for a person to relate to? However, it looks so close to the current generation of silicone sex dolls that if you are looking for a sex object, it might be enticing.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 04:44 AM
7

It's about the OP daring to raise a hand to her, a privileged woman, even indirectly (completely ignoring that she can raise a hand against a man with impunity).
/r/MensRights12/08/23 02:15 AM
19

France bans paternity testing, rewards paternity fraud, treats men as disposable ATMs and sperm donors, like indentured slaves, and is then surprised when they have another revolution.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 02:09 AM
3

Way to go planet earth in making people queue for what should be able to be done via telepresence, when the next pandemic hits. Actually I am not surprised at the agro between men and women in proximity when even nature has to drug them to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful and in the presence of pleasurable sex: just imagine non-drugged men and women together without sex.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 09:20 AM
11

That slogan was written by someone with dyslexia: they really meant "Girls lure".
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:01 AM
4

Remind me again who got Adam & Eve kicked out of paradise the first time and is doing their best to repeat that performance in the relative paradise of the 21st Century by rejecting men and coercing MGTOW by their behaviour. Talk about original sin.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 04:52 AM
1

There's nothing you can do about it, it's out of your hands, so stop stressing and playing "what if". Que sera, sera: whatever will be will be; the future's not ours to see. The fact that its taking so long could mean its a difficult thing to prove and will eventually be dismissed. Pre-charge bail though sounds like a sneaky way to punish someone based on just an allegation as if they are no longer deemed innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 04:45 AM
3

There can be good reasons why some women won't exercise in a space, especially survivors of sexual assault or discrimination themselves [who] might not want to exercise in the type of clothing you wear in a space where men are in. By the same token, there can be good reasons why some men might not feel comfortable talking about their issues in the presence of women. Gender based exclusions should apply equally to men and women. However, I have a solution: since Covid my local men's barber doesn'…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 07:34 AM
6

Tell em they forgot the "i" in "run".
/r/MensRights08/08/23 05:49 AM
1

But isn't the idea of alimony to support a wife now separated from a husbands regular support, assuming she is unsupported outside marriage? In this case, she is now being supported by a new husband, so alimony should not apply and similarly with child care: those duties should be taken up by whatever new partner she has as a package deal.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 04:52 AM
1

Well, you know what they say about beating your head against a brick wall expecting a different outcome.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 03:02 PM
1

If she has a husband, doesn't that alter child support arrangements? Or do you mean boyfriend?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 07:24 AM
2

Would you hold a similar attitude to the gaunt stick-like figures of gay men and Jewish men in the German concentration camps? It was not about their masculinity but the situation they were in. Masculinity is just a description of the traditional human male characteristics that facilitated their biological role, expressed by their natural biology, but influenced by their situation. Masculinity is not about having a 6 pack or anything that requires abnormal attention to develop or exhibit it, but…
/r/MensRights30/07/23 03:51 AM
0

I wouldn't be surprised if it is chemical: masculine men emitting pheromones that biologically make women moist, that they have to counter with other "reasons" to wrest control back. Women have trouble winning against their biology and are held hostage to it as much as men are held hostage to women. The nobel prize to anyone who discovers a synthesis of the pheromone that has this effect on women.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 02:54 AM
1

That wasn't obvious from what you said, since you tied it to sleeping with you. Punishment for wetting his own bed is not productive. Since when do boyfriends get to discipline the children of others? The law is an ass if it doesn't ensure that only genuine parents are legally entitled to discipline their children. We don't even encourage parents to discipline other children, let alone someone with no genetic connection to discipline any child.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 07:01 AM
1

The problem is that even the system of justice is biased towards guilt: police only gather evidence against the accused, not also in their defense, the prosecution generally has more assets allocated than the defense, etc. There isn't a high bar to declaring someone innocent, but a high bar to declaring guilt, because innocence is battling greater external forces determined in assigning blame and revenge. It's not a level playing field between innocence and guilt because of primitive emotions ha…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 06:49 AM
1

When you consider the priority of emotions over reason, "count to 10 before reacting" is necessary to bias against that priority. Innocent until proven guilty is a similar bias that is also necessary to offset the priority of emotion over reason: the existence of lynch mobs instead of celebration mobs is why this is necessary. I believe the full statement is more along the lines of "deemed innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law by their peers". It's a process of a…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 06:42 AM
2

You can permit your child to sleep with you, for comfort, but recommend your child not sleep with the step-Dad. Point out the rationale behind sleeping in his own bed versus sleeping with step-Dad and being punished (or did you mean bed-wetting was more general with corresponding punishment for all cases?). Over time, as hopefully punishment from step-Dad stops, the boy will feel less need for comfort from Dad and can be encouraged to spend longer and longer in his own bed. Punishing children fo…
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:25 AM
1

There's lust and then there's romantic love: both valid expressions of being a man at various times in his life. Women are just as capable as men in treating their partner as an object of gratification of some kind for themselves. Fundamentally, females are biological sex objects for males and vice versa since humans reproduce through sex, but we aren't only that to each other. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater by demanding exclusively one or the other. In a long distance relationship,…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:46 AM
3

Movies are first and foremost fictional entertainment, not factual documentaries: that some are taking them so seriously as a blueprint for life is troubling.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:51 AM
-11

It can be interpreted many ways, just like any good joke: interpreting it only in one extreme way for the purpose of being offended and playing the victim for advantage is so unintelligent.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:42 AM
-12

Aggression may be part of male DNA via testosterone, but paranoia and hysteria about it is part of female DNA.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:25 AM
1

If I recall correctly, the Titanic lifeboats were located nearer the 1st class level for logistical reasons, so it would not be surprising that more 1st class women and children would be saved, however I believe it was still largely women and children first across all the classes. Those in steerage were most disadvantaged by distance. The fundamental drive is perpetuation of the species and this is most readily achieved by saving those who are most able to do that: women as the bottleneck in rep…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:02 AM
1

Let me know how the Titanic could have saved everyone under its circumstances. Reality is that its not possible to save everyone in disasters of this nature and triage must happen. If circumstances were different, women and children first would still potentially allow all, most or some men to then follow, but triage is based on reason in impossible situations and women and children first has traditionally been seen as most reasonable from a societal perspective in those situations. We apply tria…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:17 AM
3

The elderly have had their time though and are less capable of contributing in the future, not to mention being least agile and able to be readily evacuated, if you look at it rationally.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:11 AM
2

A mans core is reason whilst a womans core is feeling: reason would suggest the merits of sacrifice, whilst feeling just gives way to primitive emotions of self preservation.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 01:06 AM
3

Not having children to fuel the growth ponzi scheme is your crime (against the elite).
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:54 AM
0

MAAAAAAATE sounds like a sheeps bleat.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:43 AM
1

Sounds like a disconnection between reason and body would impact men more substantially since reason is the core function of men, but not so much women.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:31 AM
-4

Sounds like you can interpret the movie in many ways, which suggests getting offended at only one interpretation is pointless.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:27 AM
33

Unless you have been knocking up the girls in your class, why would you buy them a gift for Mothers day when they aren't Mothers? Women may carry children but men carry the world.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:21 AM
3

Isn't autism primarily an issue of communication? Women are far more adept at communication than men, so it stands to reason men would have the biggest problem with a further reduction in the ability to communicate.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:15 AM
35

By that thinking, she should have been obliged to have a sexual relationship with every boy in the class so they all had an equal opportunity for a grade improvement: equality all the way for feminism, right?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 05:05 AM
1

They can afford to after likely having resources provided as a foundation for their future. It's kind of like inheritance providing a kick-start for the young in families, but its societally divisive as only certain individuals get a benefit and varying benefit instead of every youngster in society getting the same opportunity.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:52 AM
2

On the other hand, we mustn't be held hostage to someone else's feelings as they are their feelings to manage, although decency suggests we deal with them as kindly as possible and take their feelings into consideration as a factor in our decision making. Relationships are about mutual give and take and need to be entered into honestly, but ultimately its about our own needs taking precedence. I think marriage and relationships are deceptive in that they create expectations that may not be able …
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:03 AM
20

I kind of think that nature has reasons why it does things in a certain way that we do not yet understand or even want to understand. We thought we were so intelligent mapping the human genome and the world of genetics would be open to us playing god, then discovered there are epigenetic factors at work. I wouldn't be surprised if there is another level beyond that which we haven't discovered. Nature wants to maximise the number of genetic combinations in the hopes of achieving greater future su…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:44 PM
1

I can relate to your situation and am still struggling with it myself, however I believe I have some female traits that are contributing. Accepting my own diversity is something that I am also struggling with, even though I know it is just how I am. Feeling offended is interpreting signals in the most extreme way possible, when there are often multiple interpretations possible. Particularly if you have to draw a very subtle offense from what is said, it seems as though you are reaching for an ex…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 03:28 PM
10

None of those women mentioned they were in love with their partner: it seemed to be a relationship of convenience and social expectation rather than love and when it was no longer convenient or meeting expectations, it ended. That's okay for a superficial interaction where both know the score, but not when its pretended to be a lifetime commitment, in sickness and in health, for better or for worse, etc. I was particularly disgusted by the woman with chronic fatigue who seems to have used her lo…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 02:39 PM
29

Men and women are so incompatible that nature has to drug them to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful. 50% of marriages ending in divorce is a natural expression of the underlying incompatibility that human beings try hard to ignore or cope with. We should accept reality and intelligently work around it to achieve a better outcome for men (and women), such as informed procreation contracts but with no enforcement of monogamy for sexual fulfilment: men and women still get t…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 02:03 PM
14

Disingenuous and misleading. The first is a fantasy that most don't actually achieve in reality today, but it provides a pre-packaged life plan you don't have to think about that meets the outcomes of vested interests. You are just as likely to not have work, be rejected by women because you don't meet their shopping list, get baby-trapped or falsely accused of a crime that ruins your life, not be able to afford to buy a house, have your partner divorce you and take the kids and half your assets…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:42 AM
2

It is what it is because of biology: either accommodate it or find a workaround to biological needs that aren't held hostage to the biology and whims of another person. Considering that nature drugs men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful, what does that say about the normal fundamental compatibility between men and women? If you aren't both in love, then expect the regular incompatibility between men and women to become an issue. I believe most men and women …
/r/MensRights20/07/23 02:43 AM
1

Nah, how about just a minister for human rights and ditch ministers for gender discrimination completely?
/r/MensRights20/07/23 02:28 AM
2

Doesn't anyone filter potential partners before it gets to the dating stage any more, where this would be one of the important questions?
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:19 AM
6

What a sad story. Children deserve a childhood, not having to navigate the sexual minefield and adult world until they are better able to reason. Children won't die if they don't have sex until they are older.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:16 AM
3

However, sex and companionship don't have to be from only one source and it doesn't necessarily have to be from a woman, even though that is the only traditional option given to men. I believe the pessimism is to do with an attitude that only one option exists in life to achieve our wants, and when that option is denied, our life is over. No need to be pessimistic, because we were misled by societal conditioning that only one option exists in order to maintain a monopoly situation and it is wron…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:58 PM
1

Computers can do calculations much faster than people and so removed much of the labour involved in doing calculations. AI should hopefully find patterns in data much more quickly than humans can process huge datasets and thus create results that humans can then implement more rapidly, or apply rules more consistently to generate more uniform application with less error.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 05:59 AM
1

You need to realise that comments aren't necessarily responding personally to any points made in the source, but can be general responses associated with the themes in the source. This predilection with believing posts and comments are owned by the authors and must not contain anything outside responses to those authors on the specific points made must end: these are not private letters between 2 people.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 05:54 AM
1

You must be insecure if you thought I was referring specifically to you: it was a general comment about how the prohibition on catcalling will not be applied to women, only men.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 03:09 AM
2

I prefer the introduction of a right to bodily sovereignty including tissues: male sperm then requires consent for its use and penalties for breaking consent, just as sexual assault does now. It also is an umbrella that covers many areas relating to human complaint. Society needs to support children that are created as it needs to support all human beings, however that support could be through charitable provision of essentials instead of through money: enough to live but not a life of luxury. O…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 02:35 AM
3

Society doesn't need a mens rights movement, it needs a movement to curb the unreasoned excesses of women that are endemic to their biology. We always leave it to the next generation, who have to contend with an ever increasing problem that becomes harder to tackle. Climate change mitigation would not be as difficult if we had started tackling it a generation ago and now it looks unlikely to even be limited, let alone reversed and future generations will have to live with the consequences. Subje…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 02:17 AM
1

The issue mentions catcalling, however the legislation will likely be along more defined grievances including gestures and not relying on dictionary definitions: catcalling is simply the generic label being put on it at this time. I doubt it will include gestures by women suggesting small penis size as a crime, even though the converse would be. The broad umbrella will undoubtedly have the effect of suppressing all comments to women and then women will be upset that they no longer get the attent…
/r/MensRights17/07/23 02:07 AM
2

We did, it was called Covid and it devastated society: we should remember what happens when you remove large numbers of men from the essential but unsung work they do to keep society operating.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:28 PM
3

Eventually though you run out of virgin territory and have to face up to the challenges.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:26 PM
7

A woman going weak at the knees in the presence of a masculine man, that she can't control because it is biologically ingrained, must really chap her lips. It must then be unendurable to discover that man is not interested in a long term relationship, because he can just get what he wants from any woman without having to lift a finger and her biology does the rest and can concentrate on the women with the most to offer, whilst every woman can't help themselves in drooling over such a man who wil…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:19 PM
3

The planet and consequently the people living on it could benefit from a slow population reduction: we were fine at even half the population we are now and it would incentivise automation to remove the drudgery of labour from peoples lives to free them for more advanced occupation pursuits.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:50 PM
3

Male equivalent is domestic work to rule: if women don't desire sex, men don't desire to do the chores they traditionally do, it's a choice, however expect coercion to escalate to a divorce and/or false criminal charges situation.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:48 PM
3

The elimination of alimony is a great first step, but doesn't resolve the myriad other problems men have with relationships and no-fault divorce: there's still cuckoldry and "child" support (support for the child implemented by the Mother who can use it for her own needs too), depriving men of sex and access to their children whilst taking at least half their resources for the privilege. It's becoming parasitic behaviour when it used to be at least symbiotic behaviour. In geographic locations wh…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:42 PM
9

Informed consent should apply in more than just the case of sex.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:30 PM
1

Hopefully fully reversible vasectomies will be safe and widely available when the OP reaches reasonable child raising age.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:23 PM
1

Society encourages men to invest in the lottery of the dream family, home, lifestyle and living happily ever after, with the expectation that anyone can win, when it is actually only a small number who manage to win against the system. No other options for life are presented except buying that lottery ticket with the resources you work hard for. However, a life is made up of a number of fundamental things such as occupation, endeavour, enjoyment, sexual fulfilment, friendship, intimacy, relation…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 02:19 PM
1

Part of the problem is in the definition of catcalling as it is in unwanted staring: if the definition is just words used to refer to parts of anatomy, then compliments now become catcalls.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 08:21 AM
1

"you have beautiful eyes" "Oi, you're nicked" Some man has to spend an extra few days in detention waiting for his case to be heard, so that the limited reources of the justice system can deal with the fine involved with subjective feelings cases. It's becoming so much easier to crash the system and then women would have to contend with anarchy and true crime.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 08:13 AM
1

Statute 1984: everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 05:35 AM
2

He worked full time and she gave up her career to take care of the kids. No, she chose to transfer her career to child care to take care of the children she wanted, whilst he continued to provide the resources to support that and maintain access.
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:49 AM
1

When many women feel the male sex drive is intrinsicly sexual harassment, being male is seen as an inherently bad thing, when it is simply nature. Have women ever considered that choice over sex for their benefit is control over sexual expression of men in a similar way to mens sex drive seeking to control the choices of women for mens benefit? If one is not appropriate, then the other is also not appropriate. Society should be seeking a win-win outcome where womens choice and mens expression of…
/r/MensRights16/07/23 03:38 AM
4

Subjective feelings are not objective crimes: how did we ever get to the position of being offended means entitled to punish the alleged offender?
/r/MensRights16/07/23 01:19 AM
3

Why keep referring to it as violence, when it is deliberate humiliation? Men and women are different: let's stop pretending they are the same. Women fear violation whilst men fear humiliation: there's a reason why men don't speak of being assaulted and that is because of humiliation; they are humiliated enough internally in not being able to defend themselves, but to have it exposed to everyone amplifies that humiliation and destroys sense of self as a competent man. A safe space is required to …
/r/MensRights14/07/23 02:32 AM
-5

Women will never reason enough because its the way they were designed for their role of child nurturing in biological sexual reproduction. Until we accept this fact and limit womens subjective emotional response contribution in areas that require reasoned responses for the best outcomes, society risks a collapse back into the dark ages when primitive emotions ruled. It's already happening. Subjective feelings won't maintain a civilisation. Even men have to work at moderating subjective feelings …
/r/MensRights14/07/23 02:02 AM
2

Is it actually about mate ownership or securing ongoing exclusive access to sex at least expense (in theory) with a side order of progeny you want? Imagine having to woo a woman every single time you wanted sex, for the rest of your life. Perhaps it is getting easier for some men to have one night stands and short term relationships as some women are rejecting men as incels and then finding it harder to locate enough good men to invite into a long term relationship, so are choosing more desperat…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 12:54 PM
1

We don't know the feminist pressure any female partners of lawmakers have been applying in the background on any issue. I mean "happy wife, happy life" must mean some political sacrifices to curry favour in the domestic department.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 05:00 AM
3

The Englishman's rant over Americans in Britain during the war: over-paid, over-sexed and over here.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 04:51 AM
2

Not everything is a social construct: biology in the form of sexual reproduction creates a foundation upon which everything else rests and interacts; without changing the foundation it will forever influence everything else.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 04:46 AM
1

Easier said than done when women are involved in that life and have the power to hold men hostage. Society always pushes "the only way for men to live their lives" and does not mention any other possibility, despite there being many. You have to break your expectations of life down to its most fundamental elements and then work out how best to meet each one, not rely on one perfect woman to fulfill all needs. That's really risky as everything is in one basket and you are walking on eggshells to …
/r/MensRights12/07/23 04:40 AM
7

Paused their life to be a primary caregiver to a child they wanted, knowing full well the cost and sacrifice involved. No-one can have it all: that's just how the world has always worked with priorities and trade-offs in life for men; I can't speak for women in their fantasy worlds.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 04:10 AM
3

More incidents is not a cut-off threshold where you get something above the threshold and nothing below, it just means the response is greater for greater numbers to deal with the demand, not non-existent for lesser demand. Charities for all do not compensate for charities for women only, as it still potentially creates a 3:1 response for women versus men from the outset (ie its inherently biased from the beginning regardless of the actual need).
/r/MensRights12/07/23 03:24 AM
1

The response would likely be that male winemakers could choose to support men and boys through charitable arrangements, but they don't: it's not women winemakers responsibility to support men and boys just as it is not the responsibility of a clothing manufacturer to make clothes for all genders. They would be right in this situation, because we don't require business to provide for everyone equally, only to treat their customers equally. If women winemakers only sold that product to women, that…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 03:09 AM
18

It's a variation of revenge porn: breaking privacy to release private information to damage a person in the eyes of the rest of the community and hopefully get them to act as judge, jury and executioner and punish the subject.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 02:47 AM
1

I think women did quite well for themselves during the war and some would survive for a while if men suddenly vanished from the scene, although I don't think mere survival is what women want or expect. I think women have lost perspective and become absorbed in their subjective feelings without reason: they can't see the wood for the trees. But for men's protective instinct towards them and children, plus outlawing of violence, they would have been slapped down long ago and returned to reality. W…
/r/MensRights12/07/23 12:04 AM
1

Stop beating your head against that brick wall, expecting a different outcome and go find a different challenge in your life that is actually rewarding and not destructive.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 03:16 PM
1

Feminism is about female advantage, always was, always will be, even when they achieve parity with males.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 03:09 PM
1

I am right because I feel so: this is becoming about subjective feelings of women overriding objective harms within the justice system.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 03:07 PM
1

Women today are not a bottleneck to survival of the species as there are so many of them and they are not as vulnerable to dying in childbirth, so they actually don't need special protection. However, after millennia of special protection conditioning, it's going to take some time to reverse it. It would not surprise me that protection of women is an epigenetic factor that is going to take more than a few generations of not being necessary before it switches off. Would be interesting to gauge th…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 03:01 PM
2

I'm more of the opinion that male protectiveness stems from access to sex or protection of exclusive access to sex, however, it doesn't work so well now that women completely control access to sex but men haven't yet got the memo. I'm not even convinced of the sacrifice part, except for the lengths men are prepared to go to maintain access to sex.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:55 PM
1

Dating is the traditional precursor to marriage and children (ie procreation). If you aren't interested in procreation at such a young age (you shouldn't be because you need resources and maturity for that) then explore sexual fulfilment only and there are many ways for a man to achieve sexual fulfilment including with another person, that most men have not bothered to explore because they are conditioned to the dogma of dating->sex->procreation with one perfect woman who isn't so perfect in pra…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 02:35 PM
-1

You mean like making the female lead a thief?
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:08 AM
3

It's never about the nail in the head, only about how women feel about it.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:00 AM
9

There shouldn't be one because at its heart, "happy wife, happy life" is about holding one persons happiness hostage to another's. "happy wife, happy life" should not be a thing to aspire to as its basically a womens right without even a corresponding mens right. So much for the equality of feminism if this is what they aspire to.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:49 AM
7

Feminists haven't thought this through, as usual: nature spreads risk through as many combinations of DNA as possible in the hopes of characteristics that better improve future survival, but feminists are advocating for a reduced spread which will increase risk to survival. In Hitch Hikers Guide To The Galaxy all the considered deadbeats of society, the telephone sanitisers, the PR managers, etc are sent off in a space ship to a distant galaxy under the hoax they are being saved from a worldwide…
/r/MensRights30/06/23 09:27 AM
1

Equality means setting the same standard for all, which means unless you set that standard at a higher level than both, you are forcing one to conform to the other: a real problem when the genders are wildly different.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 09:12 AM
2

I have a different view in that men go the easiest path: heterosexual men will preferentially pursue women in the face of homophobia and it takes a deficit of women and a strong sex drive before they would even consider pursuing men; the threshold to doing this would become easier the further along Kinsey's spectrum towards homosexuality they are, however the issue is that homophobia is an inhibiting factor in men expressing who they are since society still sees diversity as unnatural and unacce…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 01:10 AM
1

There once was a time when justice involved punishment fitting the crime, but not any more: an accusation of "inappropriate behaviour", which could be anything a woman finds uncomfortable, can lead to men losing their livelihood or being sent to prison which are disproportionate sentences and not at all justice, but hell bent revenge. As much as I reject the old fashioned notion of "an eye for an eye" because the ongoing revenge nature of it would propagate forever (because the taking of an eye …
/r/MensRights28/06/23 08:47 AM
8

Any woman who feels too afraid to say no to the mildest forms of touch should not be interacting with men at all, certainly not going on dates, because she is unable to consent to anything and is just wasting everyones time. Her personal issues should not become men's responsibility.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 05:48 AM
2

No-one is questioning the right for men to decide who they relate intimately to, within the law, only pointing out options to counter the influence of engineered homophobia so men get an informed choice, not simply a dogmatic choice. Men often bring up the argument of sexual orientation and it is completely valid that it may influence a man to reject anything except heterosexual relationship, however we are not talking about a situation where women are throwing themselves at men's feet and there…
/r/MensRights28/06/23 01:28 AM
2

However sex dolls aren't real and don't provide that extra something that sharing with a real person provides. Prostitution could be an alternative, although I suspect women would just use it to argue all men should pay for sex, even if women are also getting a benefit from the sex as well as the money.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 06:50 AM
2

Please don't do that, I for one appreciate your insight as you have explained your perspective in a way I haven't experienced before, which made me think differently. It is a very complex situation for both sides that is not as black and white as we have imagined and also a conundrum. Do you think women would accept a more individually segregated lifestyle if it offered them greater assurance of less perceived threat, given that many women seem resistant to not doing what they want to do, even i…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 04:15 PM
0

However, as men, I don't think we will truly understand the fear experience of women, or their difficulty with reasoning the fear away or taking preventive action. I really don't think it is their fault, yet neither do I think it should go unchecked as it is slowly destroying society. I doubt women can be trained or given therapy to be different as I think it is biologically ingrained in each generation, passed down through epigenetic factors. Maybe in the far future when we have eliminated even…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 04:05 PM
1

What you say actually makes a lot of sense from a biological perspective: despite the recent development of contraception and termination, women had to contend with many millennia of being at risk and we know environmental influences get handed down through the generations, so any man remains a potential risk to life. On the other hand, men are at different risk from other men, however we can reason the level of risk and take steps to moderate it, whilst women don't seem able to reason the level…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 03:52 PM
1

First and foremost you are a unique human being. Look at qualities in others you admire and which resonate with you and develop them in yourself: you will likely find your own biology will naturally guide you in certain directions to things you resonate with. Don't listen to people telling you how you should be: they aren't you or can tell what your innate characteristics are. You are an autonomous being, you don't exist as an instrument of benefit to others, although you may hopefully develop a…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 03:07 PM
14

Entrenched homophobia has been very successful in creating paranoia about loss of male identity by characterising certain behaviours as feminine, when they are actually capable of being expressed by both, just statistically expressed more by women through traditional roles. It's about as reasonable as arbitrarily assigning genders to objects as in the French language. Men have been having sex with men for millennia without it being gay, but at some point religion did a huge number on sex for ple…
/r/MensRights26/06/23 02:37 PM
1

Society first has to accept the reality of mens (and womens) biological sex drive and that it needs to be satisfied for greatest societal stability. Given the higher order outcome of choice over sex for both men and women, society needs to facilitate the ability to satisfy individual sexual expression choice when a partner chooses not to. Unfortunately our current conventions of exclusiveness in monogamy, the propaganda that only a relationship with one perfect person is the true path to happine…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 04:07 AM
2

Fundamentally, it is about creating non-gendered rights as the guiding foundation for laws that support them by punishing transgression. In essence, these non-gendered rights should be part of human rights.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 02:54 AM
19

We don't need more legislation providing specific mens rights and womens right: what we need is legislation supporting equal parenting rights and responsibilities regardless of gender. Fathers day should not only be about Fathers, but the right of men to choose not to be a Father, without cuckolding or baby-trapping. It's a red herring following mens right and womens rights as they will forever be at each others throats: you have to impose and enforce equal egalitarian rights to stop the war.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 04:35 AM
2

For the same reason women aren't telling men about their multiple partners, for advantage. Sauce for the goose...
/r/MensRights22/06/23 02:00 PM
1

Black/white and men/women segregation are completely different things: the former was initiated by segregation of "class" because of snobbery, whilst the latter is to reduce sexual tension and the friction it generates when sexual beings are placed together in environments that are required to pursue other things. Segregation of men and women doesn't just protect women from men's sexual drive, it protects men from women's aggression against men they are not attracted to, pursuing their sex drive…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:54 PM
2

How does copyright, which is a commercial principle, apply to AWDTSG, when the people publishing the material are violating privacy, not copying commercial content creation?
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:17 PM
3

It's time society accepted the nature of women and moderated their response to them: the sky isn't always falling when a woman claims it is due to their greater biological tendency to neurosis and paranoia than men. What's more likely, a pedophile coincidentally being in the vicinity of a lone child at the same time in broad daylight, or a man concerned for the child's safety?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 08:13 AM
13

The principle is that the dating profile isn't public, its constrained to a particular site and should not be distributed outside that site away from its intended purpose without the owners permission as that is violating privacy of the conditions under which it was published. In any case, it isn't the business of any woman to know who a man is seeing, even though she might want to, unless there is a specific monogamy contract in place. People have autonomy and freedom of association unless othe…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 08:02 AM
3

I think the question highlights how society has lost focus of what is important: just like MensRights may not include trans-men and other diverse individuals yet to be identified, WomensRights may not include trans-women and other diverse individuals yet to be identified; therefore MensRights and WomensRights do not cover everyone in society and trying to apportion them only complicates matters unnecessarily. It's not about pursuing mens or womens competing rights in a diverse world that contain…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 07:53 AM
21

Because it is still all gynocentric: a trans-man is fundamentally still female so gets the nod, whilst a trans-woman is presenting as a woman, so gets the nod.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 06:10 AM
4

In this situation, the segregation would be to prevent potential sexual abuse from men, but its not going to prevent woman on woman violence for whatever reason. Also gives terrorists a better target to really hurt the society, in the form of more valuable women being more easily targeted. It's not a very efficient system though because of overloads breaking the implementation or underloads wasting seats that can't be taken by other people. Bound to create societal dysfunction however they imple…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 02:52 AM
9

Men aren't allowed to leave whilst the war is ongoing, but as soon as it ends, I would hope all men will flee the country and leave it to the women to do a better job.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 02:43 AM
13

These groups have lynch mob written all over them, with the potential to collude to destroy any man they so desire. Dating multiple people is not a crime, but violating privacy in order to revenge and potentially defaming people in the process should be. Platforms should not be supporting this practice as reasonable use. It's time society managed Eve's irrational tendencies so we don't get kicked out of Eden again (although I fear it is already too late with irrational mate selectivity and ignor…
/r/MensRights13/06/23 02:30 AM
114

Is it possible to get all these types of pages immediately reportable and taken down, because effectively they violate the privacy of the men they identify, in a similar way to distributing private photos as revenge porn? Women may not like men dating multiple women, but its not a crime, however violating privacy as revenge is not a reasonable use of Facebook or any other social media or forum platform.
/r/MensRights13/06/23 02:17 AM
10

It's not your or anyone's place to dictate how a man should express his own sexual fulfilment. That's not to imply any man has the right to impose expression of his sexual fulfilment on anyone without their consent, but it does mean society needs to better facilitate mens sexual expression instead of leaving it hostage to womens wishes. Our current monogamous relationship structures do not provide flexibility for men to seek sexual fulfilment outside of the relationship for surplus sexual needs:…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:38 PM
4

Tell that to homosexuals who have only relatively recently had their situation removed from the DSM and failed conversion therapy attempts.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:22 PM
3

Then how do you explain homosexuality? It's been removed from the DSM so is no longer considered a mental problem. However, if you postulate that a hormone imbalance during fetal development, at a crucial time, influences part of the brain that deals with orientation and changes it from a male pattern to a female pattern, it fits with the outcome. It further fits if that influence extends further into other areas that influence behaviour, changing it from a male pattern to a female pattern and y…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:19 PM
6

I think gender dysphoria is real (eg partly male brain to varying degrees inside a female body), but I also think some people just want the perceived benefits of the other sex. Don't know how you differentiate them, but I suspect those who regret transitioning do not have gender dysphoria.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 01:00 PM
3

Is this the real reason for r/AustralianPolitics going dark for 2 days so we couldn't discuss the unfolding political drama? This is going to really damage #BelieveWomen when the truth finally comes out, but I fear Ms. Higgins will simply transfer her victimhood from rape to manipulated puppet to avoid consequences. During all of this, the accused was forced from his livelihood on mere allegation (no mean punishment itself for someone who is still legally considered innocent because their guilt …
/r/MensRights12/06/23 10:55 AM
110

Trans-man is still female at heart, yet confused why being male is so different to being female. Being male is about the influence of testosterone from the beginning of development and its associated sociological influences that reinforce it. The suicide rate amongst men is not higher because men can't make friends, its because men are told they shouldn't be men and denied their own identity, continue to be treated as disposable ATMs and sperm donors and forced to accept the scraps of sex thrown…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 10:17 AM
0

There is actual diversity in gender, however society has refused to accept anything outside of strict human male and female biological expression. This is why the more extreme diverse such as homosexuals and gender dysphorics have had such a hard time gaining acceptance, where the pressure has always been on conforming to rigid stereotypes instead of being their diverse selves. I believe these diverse individuals have been joined by those who don't like how their sex is treated and believe the g…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 09:55 AM
5

Biology generally does things for a reason, even though we may not have yet worked out what they are and whilst we may want nurture to play a more important role, so we can think we can control it, I'm of the opinion that biology remains the primary foundation. It's quite possible homosexuality is the development of a partially female brain, to varying degrees, due to the influence of disrupted hormones during gestation. This would explain a female sexual orientation, higher oxytocin and greater…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 09:14 AM
8

Unless you have an urgent medical need that can not be treated any other way, then circumcision is unnecessary. It's the rough equivalent of removing the healthy appendix in a baby, simply because it may get infected in the future, with all the attendant surgical risks. Those surgical risks are largely why males are dying during circumcision. Even the most common medical cause leading to circumcision, phimosis (tightening of the foreskin) can often be relieved with medication. When the penis is …
/r/MensRights12/06/23 08:36 AM
1

My local one has almost as many women as men. Don't get me wrong, I think if its something women would also like to do, then they should be able, but it comes with the consequence of destroying mens ability to cooperate and socialise with other men, without being chilled by the presence of women who have to be "protected". Why shouldn't men be able to freely bitch to other men about women, in the same way that women bitch to each other about men in their exclusive womens groups, without it being…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 07:27 AM
0

There is a push to differentiate sex and gender, with sex being biology and gender being whatever you identify with. If you can no longer know with certainty the person in front of you is male or female by a casual glance, looking for biological cues, it becomes difficult to relate to them in the way you want, so you get fear and uncertainty. Trans effectively breaks all assumptions and upsets the shorthand society has been using for millennia. It was bound to happen eventually as we come to gri…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 07:08 AM
1

If you redefine trans-man as man, then cis-man and trans-man are identified by the same word "man", yet they are very different. Man = cis-man and there was no need to introduce the cis qualifier as man has always been adult male, but I only use it to differentiate. Trans-people use it to muddy the waters and further their narrative. Now "man" equals two people with different characteristics and so man and men have lost their unique identity. That is where the fear comes from: men being thought …
/r/MensRights12/06/23 06:59 AM
88

As we have seen under Title IX, innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law is being gradually transformed into guilty on accusation in a faux court, with all the checks, balances, objective thresholds and burdens required to achieve justice for both parties, watered down to achieve conviction.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 05:58 AM
1

Fundamentally, phobia is fear and generates a fight or flight response: in the fight mode it is expressed as an attack on the thing that generates the fear. Men and women cling to their respective historical identities. Homophobia exists because some gay men exhibit feminine characteristics and cis men fear being identified as feminine through association with gay men. Transphobia exists because trans people are pushing to define themselves as men and women when they are different and cis men an…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 05:51 AM
0

I disagree: there is fear of trans people for redefining the existing identity of men and women to be something inbetween and thus blurring that identification. If someone with female chromosomes, a partly female brain, testosterone therapy and cosmetic surgery redefines man to equate to them, where does that leave someone with male chromosomes, a wholly male brain, natural testosterone and no cosmetic surgery in having an identity? The obvious result is that "cis men" start identifying as "real…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 03:53 AM
2

There isn't a better alliance between mens rights people and trans people because everyone misses the point that rights need to be inclusive and not gendered, else we just get a fight between rights tailored to each specific group as we do already between mens rights and womens rights. We should only have rights that are egalitarian else its just a struggle for advantage (even if that advantage is to equalise things between different groups). It's kind of like the situation with gendered bathroo…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 03:07 AM
-1

All power to trans men as trans men and living their unique life, or to any person living their unique life, but don't try to redefine man to the unique situation of trans man: it would be the equivalent of gay men trying to redefine man in their image.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:49 AM
2

At its most fundamental, mens sexual needs are legally forced to the level of womens sexual needs but not the reverse: it's only ever about what she wants as the standard. Human beings have not yet evolved to strive for a win-win outcome, only a win for women. Trans men are not "men", how can they be with female chromosomes and a brain massaged into a female form during the formative years?
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:32 AM
4

Mens sheds in Australia existed years ago, but are now required to be inclusive and renamed "Community Sheds". Sadly it removed the ability for men to discuss whatever they liked and so has to be female-friendly, although it still means men being able to work side-by-side with other men (and women). It would be more appropriate to call them "Womens Sheds Where Men Can Still Labour" as the social tone has to be acceptable to women as the deciding factor, in a similar way to men's sexual expressio…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:15 AM
6

My point was that "violence" can be defined with a very low threshold for one gender compared to the other simply by using differing gender characteristics. A slap and a punch are both violent expressions, however a slap will often not be seen as violence by a woman because it is against a big strong man who should be able to take it and he deserved it anyway.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 02:02 AM
3

I believe in "do unto others as you would have others do unto you": if you are fine leaving someone when they are of no further use to you, then you have to accept that being done to you too, without complaint. It's sobering when you think about it. The problem is that women are largely protected from others doing unto her: if she slaps a man he deserved it, but if she's slapped, its criminal violence; the same type of crime, women get reduced punishments compared to men; there are double standa…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 01:55 AM
3

His testicles were slapping her on the arse during sex. OMG violence against women!
/r/MensRights12/06/23 01:34 AM
4

As soon as I read "x% of country A in study B" I turn off because the data is already flawed: studies are never done on the entire population of a country, only a sample and depending on the questions asked are easily manipulated. A group of 1,000 men and 1,000 women aged 18-35 from across Germany were asked to give their views on masculinity for the study, which was carried out online. What about the balancing study on femininity and violence? Women can be very slap-happy when emotionally arous…
/r/MensRights12/06/23 01:28 AM
1

This is all a result of millennia of biological role playing: you can't expect it to change overnight or even at all if you still want the roles to be played and the biological underpinnings remain. Testosterone is the main mediator of the differences as it supports the male biological role and is why women can transition to trans-men (they aren't men, but trans-men, as their brains and bodies are already and still partly female wired and that can't be completely undone).
/r/MensRights09/06/23 08:08 AM
1

If you were a little passive guy, you would probably experience the same thing a woman does: it's not because they are women, but because they have characteristics that allow men to disregard them. Being the only one in the room with those characteristics automatically means you are outnumbered. Men are competitive by nature: anyone not up to their standard is quickly removed and even those up to their standard jockey for position; most women just aren't in the race. I don't know why so many peo…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 01:34 AM
1

Maybe its like the bias you get when you buy a new car, suddenly just because you now own one, you see them everywhere whereas before you didn't, except those cars haven't magically increased overnight, but your ownership bias is exerting itself.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 01:15 AM
1

Feminism started it by pushing for womens rights, but not responsibility, when they should have been pushing for fundamental common rights and responsibilities for everyone and highlighting how women were not being represented in those rights.
/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:11 AM
1

We will only make progress in this area when we stop supporting womens rights and mens rights and pursue egalitarian rights or human rights instead. The rights women want for themselves is inherently discriminatory and unbalanced, as are mens rights. Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 02:02 PM
1

If women no longer want their kids or their husband, why do they fight so hard to prevent them leaving?
/r/MensRights04/06/23 03:12 AM
6

Visibility of female flesh incites male arousal: it's biological once we lost the ability of detecting pheromones and other obvious signs of estrus and started engaging in sex constantly. Why do people still reject this reality and act so surprised that men are attracted to exposure of female flesh? That women find the natural male sex drive annoying, if its not by a man she finds attractive, is a linked but different matter. Are women unable to understand that depriving men of the sex they need…
/r/MensRights04/06/23 02:37 AM
1

Women no longer need special protection, because they are no longer at significant risk of dying before they can reproduce, which was why they required extra protection in the past to maintain continuation of the species. Hurt feelings are no excuse for extra protection beyond objective criminal law for everyone either.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 01:05 AM
1

It's never been about gender equality, only womens advantage in a "heads I win, tails you lose" kind of way.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 02:20 AM
1

How can you fight for rights that don't exist and can't be created without all of society agreeing to amend the Constitution? That's an impossible situation when more women and white knights than men are comfortable with the way things are going in bashing men. Women aren't interested in listening to a mans reasoned perspective over her own emotional impulses. Discretion is the better part of valour: men could take action to change the situation, but it would collapse society and they are still …
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:55 PM
1

It's never been about equality, but female advantage: it's embedded in the name "feminism". For all those people angry about using "female" instead of "woman", we'll amend our ways if you change feminism to womanism.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:26 PM
1

Lift girls up high enough and you reduce their dignity.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:25 PM
1

Her She Y? Might just as easily be Her (s) He (y) non-discrimination, except some people seem to want to introduce discrimination where none is necessary.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:21 PM
1

If government can't find accommodation, then the remainder should be given money to pay for a hotel or equivalent, whoever they may happen to be. Perhaps this can be recovered from the international agencies that support international refugees etc.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:17 PM
1

Doesn't this contradict the foundational principles of justice: "innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law"? Charges are not the practice of justice, nor is simply an arrest or "interview", simply some of the earlier mechanisms and conventions of the system.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 02:07 PM
1

Collapse doesn't require invasion: modern society is incredibly vulnerable to disruption of supply pipelines. The oil crisis in the 1980's brought society close to collapse and potentially drought and overdrawing will soon bring about a collapse due to water shortages. Even the Ukraine war is having a major destabilising effect in some countries. If women continue to alienate men, then that may lead to a collapse if men choose to withdraw their labour in providing resources to women in general. …
/r/MensRights02/06/23 01:56 PM
2

And with menstrual and menopause leave whilst they are working, they will obtain an increased income for the same productivity, which means prices will likely increase to absorb it and women will be back to square one, whilst men will be worse off than before.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 01:40 PM
2

Just because you can doesn't mean you should or make it a good idea. Nature strives for the greatest combination of genetic material in the hopes that some of those combinations will provide enhanced survival capability in the future against mutations in viruses and bacteria. If 99.9% of the worlds men were wiped out tomorrow, that would mean only 1 man for every 1000 women and a 99.9% reduction in genetic diversity. Would human beings survive in the short term, yes, but the long term would see …
/r/MensRights02/06/23 01:36 PM
2

I wouldn't call it fun being in a constant state of fear, anxiety and paranoia that they will be raped by some man and not being able to reason the risk is low and the consequences manageable. Historically women were in a worse position of risk with consequences that were often terrible, but I think it has been somehow burned into their psyche so they continue to operate on the old programming, despite the situation changing. It doesn't help that they don't seem able to moderate their primitive …
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:45 AM
32

Entrenched competition between men and "F U Jack I got mine and I'm not going to risk it for you" attitudes.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:27 AM
3

Women are too dependent on men to GTOW, always have been because of their biology needing more resources than they can provide alone to raise a child.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:06 AM
7

Then the average person is not thinking rationally about consequences and will end up paying a price.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:58 AM
2

Without considering the consequences of poisoning the well to themselves and the rest of society. Adam & Eve are going to be thrown out of paradise again, because of Eve's nature.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:56 AM
2

They are basically complaining against the principle of autonomy of people because they don't like them shaping their own lives instead of accepting being shaped by the complainers for their own purposes. Do men not have a right to be autonomous and lead their own lives?
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:53 AM
7

This is simply a further iteration of the primitive survival of the fittest programming of nature that human "civilisation" has still not tackled in reaching for higher order outcomes. It's kind of a hypocrisy to give women choice over sex, but deny men opportunity of sexual expression for themselves, because it remains hostage to womens choices. The only solution is to break the monopoly hold women have on mens sexual expression, which includes denying unattractive men access to sexual expressi…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:45 AM
2

Fundamentally extortion, which is a crime in most other contexts.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:25 AM
1

Discourse will inevitably trigger offense and get you attacked or insulted enough to incite a response women can criminalise. Women are masterbaiters.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:18 AM
1

Dying in childbirth often meant during the first child, so they didn't have an opportunity for 5-10 kids. Italy and Japan are expected to see their populations halve by 2100, assuming nothing changes. Interestingly, that is about the same population as 100 years ago. Would a population in Japan of 60 million people be a problem with the technology of today? It wasn't at the time it last occurred with far less technology and more human labour required. That's 80 years away with at least current l…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 12:55 PM
2

Only from a perspective of keeping ponzi schemes going. Japan wasn't going extinct in the past at half the population or less and its going to take a long time for it to drop that far, assuming nothing is done about fertility. Women aren't the bottleneck like they were in the past, because they aren't dying in greater numbers than men through childbirth, limiting the number of children that can be born.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 11:05 AM
4

I believe historically there was balance in the natural sacrifice of women (eg death through childbirth and sexual vulnerability linked to said childbirth) and the coordinated sacrifice (disposability in comparison to women being a bottleneck to survival needing to be protected) of mens roles. The pill changed the balance and gave advantage to women, whilst not changing anything for men: men were still disposable whilst women were no longer a bottleneck to species survival requiring special prot…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 08:00 AM
1

Testosterone motivates competition between males over females, which generally keeps them apart, except when men are electively or forcefully engaged in cooperative enterprises. I don't think it is any more complicated than that biological basis and there has been little reason to change up until recently, because competition among men has been maintained by society. It's only now that women are destroying the foundation of competition by excluding many men from participating, that we have a gro…
/r/MensRights25/05/23 02:31 AM
2

Unless women are okay with sharing, that strategy will result in an entire generation of relationship-less men and women. 80% of women chasing 20% of men means both men and women excluded from a 1:1 relationship.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:56 AM
1

Given the propensity for human vice, what organisational system would be more effective than socialism, marxism or capitalism?
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:34 AM
1

Or that they even wanted to vote with its attendant responsibilities.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:20 AM
2

I have to agree with that statement, but amend it to include "The world wasn't always a good place for women or men" for a full perspective and not just a selective extract.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:17 AM
5

Feminists want men to express their emotions, yet when negative emotions such as dislike or hate are expressed they are demanded to be suppressed or called misogyny to attract punishment to suppress them, yet they are equally valid emotions. However, when women express hatred with slurs such as "incel", no-one bats an eyelid. Double standards and hypocrisy reign supreme.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 03:11 AM
0

The only practical response to conflicts as a result of diversity is individual segregation. This is inevitable as society progresses to a greater living from home arrangement for other reasons and has a certain synergy. Even the practice of forcing men and women into proximity for work, resulting in sexual tension, benefits from individual segregation. People should only choose to interact with each other when they want to, not when they are obliged to for commercial economics or expediency.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:38 AM
1

However, the occurrence can be minimized. I believe crime overall is decreasing in western societies and its not because people are losing an ability to be sinful or evil, but they are learning to moderate those urges better through reason.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 01:10 AM
1

What has been done with legislation can be undone with legislation, although it may not make much difference to the men who have been burned by womens rejection and are twice shy about returning to the previous situation. Women will have to live with the consequences of their actions, but so too unfortunately will men. Adam & Eve is being repeated and we should have paid more notice to that parable of wisdom before being seduced.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 06:53 AM
-2

Equality of treatment is worthwhile and obtainable, just not equality in everything.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:44 AM
1

I met a woman online who was upfront she wasn't interested in a romantic relationship whilst I was upfront about wanting a sexual interaction, so we decided to just meet as friends. After just 2 days of getting to know each other, she had changed her mind, but even if she hadn't, I had also changed my mind and was fine with just friends. Anything is possible. I think some women apply a filter to ensure sex is deferred until she has a chance to really get to know the guy without that pressure.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:29 AM
1

Whilst every creatures fundamental life purpose is set by biology, human beings have awareness, intelligence and reason to reach beyond fundamental biology to achieve higher order outcomes, including their own life's purpose. There is more than one way for a man to have a life than with just one "perfect" woman that society tries to convince us is the only way. However you have to do some work yourself in determining what you want out of life at a fundamental level, not accepting the ready-made …
/r/MensRights20/05/23 01:16 AM
1

I'm not going to respond further, because you keep taking what I say out of context by selectively splitting it into discrete parts. I don't think men have been oppressed, they have been brought up to best meet their biological roles. Perhaps those roles need to be re-assessed and the requirements relaxed a little, but that doesn't necessarily mean they need to change, because biology hasn't changed: women still expect men to protect them and they can't do that if they are women. I'm concerned t…
/r/MensRights19/05/23 03:05 AM
1

The only true rights are egalitarian rights: there should be no place for gendered rights of any form fighting against each other.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 02:21 AM
3

Men don't exist to entertain or meet women's desires or unrealistic expectations and I notice most of them are over 6', so much for diversity. This is simply pandering to what women think they want in men and it is unrealistic and unreasonable. In the past, women wanted to be swept off their feet, but today that would be considered assault, so in trying to minimise discomfort, women have effectively eliminated one of the things they wanted. Womens expectations of men are now being manipulated by…
/r/MensRights19/05/23 02:13 AM
0

Have always been amused by comments that try to portray men as feminine if they emulate something that women do, such as being penetrated. Men shedding a tear? Must be feminine. Men taking a shit? Must be feminine. It's ludicrous. As long as men are present as good Fathers in their sons lives, they will foster identification through closer contact than any teacher. The problem is in absent and distant Fathers who have never been educated how to be a good Father and emulate their own instead, car…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 10:55 PM
6

However its all the people paying for this from their taxes: aren't they concerned about the sheer waste of their taxpayer dollars that are not being spent on actual services for them?
/r/MensRights17/05/23 09:07 PM
4

I once read about a country that was toying with the idea of making anything beyond a one-night-stand a defacto relationship. I don't think it was implemented, but its disturbing that they were even considering it. Pity the Canadians at only 6 months, but I'm sure another country will do even better than that eventually. It's a counter-productive policy as it will simply encourage casual sex with no commitment, but if a woman can get pregnant and declare a particular man the Father without evide…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 08:58 PM
4

How much is it costing the State and therefore taxpayers to not only incarcerate innocent people but deprive the State of their contribution? Even at an economic level, people should be asking questions about this practice, let alone the ethical, moral, judicial and Constitutional implications.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 08:29 PM
16

If you are guilty in a womans mind, apparently that's enough.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 08:21 PM
2

Government grants you the responsibilities associated with a Father when child support is due: it doesn't care if you have any rights or benefits accruing to a Father at any time. Men are just disposable servants to the State and women whose interests align when it comes to creating children for their own purposes: really just ATMs, sperm donors and perhaps child care.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 08:08 PM
0

Many women have a child without a man's consent and then come looking for support after the fact, from any man they can get their hooks into with support from the State with discriminatory legislation that finds a man guilty of being a Father merely by accusation. Men have few rights in this matter to challenge the accusation, with a paternity test being about the only proof accepted and then often that being refused to be tested to ensure the man is always on the hook over supporting a child an…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 07:51 PM
-3

Drax is only a destroyer because of revenge over the murder of his wife and child: he was already experienced as a Father. The women in the scene are not experienced at being Mothers. Why would you tear up at recognition of men being good parental figures? Men and women have been raising children successfully for millennia, so in one sense both have been good parental figures. You can't call out men for being bad parental figures without calling out women too, however both traditionally have dif…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 07:34 PM
9

The world is what we make it and it will be made in womens image if men continue to sit back and let discriminatory laws be enacted under the pretense of equality and women presenting the only narrative by pretending to be disadvantaged victims or speaking for men.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:28 PM
14

Bromance is a term coined as a slur on mens close relationships to trigger a homophobic response by associating it with sexuality and making it a joke, in a similar way that "incel" has been coined as a slur on mens sexual competence and behaviour when that is created by women themselves choosing to reject sex with those men, leading to not unexpected anger, but being extended to any man who doesn't have sex as a member of an intrinsicly woman-hating rapist group. Relationships span a range of i…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:20 PM
33

What business is it of women to comment on the private relationship between men as if they get a say in it? It's mens business.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 12:57 PM
-18

That's being deceptive and almost as bad as cheating. Why not be upfront about it to reassure the one most at risk of being extorted? It's easy for a woman to extort a man over a child, but difficult for a man to extort a woman over a child when she has the ultimate control over the conception. Women being upset about not being trusted do not understand trust is a risk minimisation strategy that has to be developed. Methinks the lady doth protest too much.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:03 AM
8

It's more than cheating, it's fraud and potential extortion because there is substantial money involved under false pretences. Trust needs to be earned, it doesn't just happen by default from the start where you blindly trust someone and then reduce that trust with it being broken: you have to develop trust from a default point of distrust because of the risk involved. Women want trust to exist by default so they have the option to break that trust behind a mans back until its too late to do any…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:57 AM
1

Social media platforms are designed for women anyway: this will just accelerate turning them into feminist echo chambers. Perhaps it's a good thing as it will force men off those platforms and no longer being abused by the women on them. Let the women be TwitFaces and welcome to it.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 02:30 PM
8

It's not only about choice though: choice doesn't exist in a vacuum, it is constrained by external circumstances and it has consequences, neither of which women want to hear or address.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:09 AM
8

Women tend to go more for majors associated with social-communications skills, which means a skewing against the technical-scientific-construction fields. Whilst social based jobs are important, a society can't function without the others. Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy had a disguised skit on this when they sent the telephone sanitisers, management consultants and other "useless" functions into space with the excuse the earth was under attack and they were preserving their lives, when it was …
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:05 AM
14

Men are insecure because they are held hostage to the capricious and self-interested whims of women throwing whatever scraps they deem fit from the table. Single men at least aren't held hostage and can theoretically better consider how to meet their needs, except for homophobia and simps reducing their options and imposed shaming (eg watching porn) designed to break their will to live.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 05:46 AM
3

No, we as a society need to do more to prevent the creation of male victims, such as reinforcing sexual assault, harassment and rape against men as equal to that for women under the law as a deterrent. Prevention rather than treatment. This is a prime example of the double standard leading to male victims: if the genders were reversed and it was Justin Bieber sexually assaulting Jenny McCarthy on stage, there would be hell to pay.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 05:44 AM
1

I don't give that strategy long before women use "being ignored in a socialisation sense" as an expression of male violence (passive aggressive?) and misogyny.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:17 PM
1

Accept the parable of Adam & Eve that Eve can always be trusted to get men and society ultimately, in trouble because of their nature. Humanity still hasn't acted on that ancient wisdom to be more vigilant.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:14 PM
2

What a horrific thing for anyone to go through, let alone a young person. I hope you are receiving therapy to recover from such a traumatic experience that would still be having repercussions. The tragedy is that this type of bullying is allowed to go on in prisons too, with the authorities just turning a blind eye, so it's not simply educational institutions, but a primitive mob mentality of human beings who seem to delight in taking out their personal inadequacies or sociopathies on a scapegoa…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:06 PM
1

I'm only suggesting options for men they may have not actually considered due to ingrained habit, conditioning or simply child-like rejection of the unusual because it is unusual. Habit is a difficult thing to challenge. I'm not demanding any man change his mode of sexual expression, just highlighting that there are options out there if women holding men hostage deprives them of sex enough for them to start hunting for other options for expressing their sex drive and seeking sexual fulfilment. I…
/r/MensRights13/05/23 02:56 AM
1

Conversion therapy often fails because it is working against resistance to change and seeks to force a change in a person by creating unpleasant associations with the unwanted behaviour that create an internal conflict in the individual. I'm only advocating men challenge habit and dogma as a personal choice, for a potentially improved outcome under dire circumstances: I'm not demanding they do so, its no skin off my nose as they say. In a way, it's like a child who says "yuck, I'm not eating tha…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 03:24 AM
-1

I would agree with you if heterosexual men were not being rejected for sex by their one and only conditioned avenue of expression. Gay men are not being rejected by their conditioned avenue of expression to the same degree and so don't have an issue that needs to be solved. The world doesn't just comprise homosexual and heterosexual: there are bisexual men too for whom orientation isn't a problem. It has been said that every gay man is a little bit straight and every straight man is a little bit…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 02:20 AM
-4

Heterosexuality is fundamentally about reproduction, which is different from recreational sex. Do men only have recreational activities with women, because they are only sexually attracted to women, or do they also have recreational activities with men because the game doesn't depend on gender? It's the same with recreational sex: erotic stimulation does not depend on the gender of the human body parts doing the stimulating, or else men would be going "yuck" whenever they masturbated with a male…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 02:26 PM
1

I would say that 50% of relationships ending in divorce is representative of more than "some" men quitting women, even if they allow the women to do the quitting for them in a percentage of those cases.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 04:00 AM
6

Bill Burr does a wonderful skit on sexbots from blowup dolls to robots. I don't think it would be a sad and pathetic future when men are currently held hostage to their biological sexual expression by women. I think it will be a viable option for mens wellbeing as will the option of having sex with other men once we get the homophobic conditioning out of society. Remember that nature has to drug men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful: that doesn't speak highl…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:31 AM
6

Interesting conundrum: would men prefer to have "scrap" sex with actual women who determine how much a man can have and are objectionable, incompatible and an assets risk, or as much sex as they would like when they like with mechanical devices that only exist to serve? An alternative conundrum replacing mechanical devices with other men who are more compatible and essentially equivalently able to provide pleasure.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 09:59 PM
17

Imagine what would happen if a man adopted a child without consent of his wife and she was suddenly required to help support it, even if she divorced and didn't want a child, until it was adult. The reverse is what men can experience when a woman has a child without her husbands consent.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 09:50 PM
1

It's not a case of men looking after themselves when one of the selection criteria used by women now is height: there's obviously something else going on, like making perfect the enemy of good enough and men have no chance playing by those rules. It's really unfortunate feminism has reinforced the notion that women can hold out for perfect and not suffer any consequences, because they are suffering consequences: every woman that goes after Chad deprives another woman and another man of a relatio…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:51 PM
3

Men don't "use" women for sex because women are consenting to that sex: that's the whole point of consent so that both are benefiting from a mutual interaction they both want and neither is "using" the other; or sex doesn't happen and then neither is using the other anyway. When women complain of being used for sex and then discarded, they mean their expectations for a long term relationship, children and resources has not been realised, however sex is not a commitment to a contract for that exp…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:28 PM
38

It's the most productive years of a persons life not only for themselves but for society and it has not only all just been wasted by a false conviction, but I would hazard a guess that the inmate has been further punished and traumatised by the prison system itself (ironically actual rape and criminal activity), deprived of their livelihood and have little prospects going forward. There should be considerable compensation for this egregious implementation of the justice system that lets these th…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 01:42 PM
1

Drugged by whatever chemicals create the "in love" effect. I think more people are having relationships when not actually "in love", so those things about the other person that annoy you that are normally suppressed with the drugging, remain prominent and eventually become too much to bear. I think there are also unrealistic expectations about relationships that become an issue when the honeymoon period ends, with women feeling they can change their man (but actually can't and just creates oppos…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:09 AM
1

When you consider that men and women have to be drugged to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful, it's obvious that the normal state is for men and women to be in a state of conflict. Also, women are biologically designed to attend to the needs of multiple children simultaneously, not to the needs of men, so of course there will be less stress from children.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 04:08 PM
2

Beyond personal choice, discrimination must have a very specific societal gain that can't be achieved in any other way, for it to be acceptable. Equality too must not be pursued as an absolute, because absolutes become singularities when the universe is fundamentally diverse and needs to accommodate difference, not make everything the same (equal = the same = singularity). Women and men have a valid issue in allowing other genders into their personal spaces without their consent, however this ca…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 03:38 PM
3

It actually comes down to a very fundamental discussion about equality: "her body her choice" is about consent over the use of a womans own body and the options giving her that control over the outcome of the focus of consent (ie consent is pointless if there isn't options to control outcome), yet men aren't given the same effective control in use of their body (ie their sperm). Women aren't hugely at risk of having their eggs harvested and used to create a baby without their consent, unlike men…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 02:34 PM
3

On the other hand, would you really want a female partner who listens to gossip like that to formulate her opinion of a man's qualities, who will then likely proceed to listen to similar gossip magazines during any relationship about the relationship and all its aspects? Perhaps being a member of that sub should be a red flag to all men.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 01:59 PM
3

This sub is already being overrun with posts about public drama or females demanding to be educated by reposts of material that already exists, just for them, clogging up the sub with posts that are not about mens rights and requiring men provide them with more resources whilst those men expending energy on trolls, not on further pursuing mens rights. I swear this is becoming more like a blog about "days of our lives" instead of mens rights.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 01:54 PM
33

If women don't owe men sex, then men don't owe women orgasms.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 01:40 PM
3

Has anyone considered that insults are designed to incite a man's emotions beyond his ability to reason, so that he snaps and does something that the woman can actually criminalise and once again play the victim? It's a means to an end. I don't think women actually believe it, because their other behaviour in attraction to bad boys, who are inevitably masculine men, suggests otherwise. It's also a projection of womens own vulnerability: by creating a situation where men are as vulnerable to snap…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:04 AM
1

I think feminists would like to make men engaging in sex a crime, but women choosing to have sex, not.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:45 AM
5

When the objective is revenge, not guilty is unacceptable and the ends justify the means. Civilisation is regressing as justice (for both accused and accuser) for objective harms is being replaced with revenge for subjective hurt feelings and the ends justify the means.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:30 AM
5

Perhaps the male lawyers finally twigged that they could be held just as guilty as other men under those travesties of justice.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 04:09 AM
9

Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder of primarily sexual interest in children, which I doubt they can help as much people with bipolar or other disorders can help it. Society needs to accept they will exist in small numbers and to facilitate a life for them that prevents harm to children but also enables them to have as good a life as they can given their condition, and encourages them to seek "treatment" not drive them underground through fear of punishment. We don't just lock up people with ot…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 03:59 AM
10

Fear and its cousin paranoia are powerful motivators, especially in a species that has the barest veneer of moderation of primitive emotions and particularly where women rarely exhibit even that veneer. We need to understand this reality and take steps to negate its impact before it gets completely out of control (although I fear we have already gone beyond that point). What I don't understand is male police officers seemingly eager to confirm a man with a child is a pedophile, but not concerned…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 03:43 AM
1

Please leave it up as its an indication of how society is punishing men severely, by depriving them of their livelihood, merely through accusation of wrongdoing that bypasses the justice system and its checks and balances of due process, innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt, etc. Depriving someone of their livelihood is a severe punishment due to the loss of effort in accruing that position plus the loss of future earnings and a black mark that follows them and influences their f…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 03:09 AM
1

Schools are not bound by sexual criminal codes and the protections of the justice system, but are practicing a kind of shadow justice without protection under the dubious umbrella of Title IX which was never designed for sexual crimes but which is seriously punishing men using more of an inquisition mentality.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:31 AM
3

Asking is not specifically creating a pre-condition of sex when consent for unprotected sex has already been given. Consent also has to be practical: men don't have complete control over the ejaculation reflex and whilst he may have had the intention to honour her request, accidents do happen. Should we punish accidents? Unprotected sex comes with major risks of pregnancy. Ignoring those risks by not taking additional measures to minimise them means she is culpable in placing the entire responsi…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:23 AM
7

People having preferences is not an issue: believing those preferences are the only thing that matters, don't have consequences that should also be taken into account, a dogmatic expectation that preferences will always be met just because you have them, or that others won't also have preferences against you too, is a huge problem. As the OP says: those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 01:02 AM
2

It just is, but that doesn't mean it can't be accommodated and worked around to achieve an overall better result for men. For example, we could separate sex and procreation, so that procreation is only supported under an informed consent contract, with associated parental and relationship education and responsibilities (and penalties for breaking the contract), that is undertaken primarily in the best interest of the childs development, with sex, beyond that required for procreation, a matter of…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:50 PM
3

We can use reason to change being disposable, just as we use reason to bypass procreation when we want to: human beings are not completely bound by their biology, although it remains a fundamental part of who we are and our foundational behaviours. That's why I don't believe you can hate men or women for being who they were designed to be, only try to understand why and workaround any issues to achieve win-win higher order outcomes.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:40 PM
1

For the same reason men don't get "its not about the nail": men and women are fundamentally different. It's like living in two different and partly conflicting cultures but never being able to actually experience the other culture and appreciate what it is like and its perspectives. Trans people may be the closest thing to experiencing both cultures and they often find the reality of it confronting and different from the expectation. I'm not sure we should even try to understand the struggles of…
/r/MensRights03/05/23 03:25 PM
5

In a world of roughly equal balance of men and women numbers, finding women who won't falsely accuse will mean many men left out: it's basically a survival of the fittest attitude, not a civilised attitude and will not fix anything either. Trial and error is going to get you hung out to dry by one of the errors.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 03:31 AM
3

Perhaps by continuing to promote objective reason over subjective emotion wherever possible: civilisation only exists because of objective reason triumphing more over primitive subjective emotional impulses and uniform justice for all can not exist where the threshold for justice depends on individual subjectivity which can not be easily tested or verified. We need more philosophers and thinkers presenting in society instead of media click-baiting for profit inciting gossip, drama, offense, outr…
/r/MensRights02/05/23 02:19 AM
2

I understand that in past society, a wife was considered a man's responsibility and she had none herself and could do whatever she liked and the man was held responsible for the consequences. Strange that we seem to be back to that very situation again so soon.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 01:04 AM
4

Society must continue to reinforce the idea and practice of "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law" as I believe it was implemented to counter this very tendency of people to bay for blood for any excuse (ie lynch mob behaviour).
/r/MensRights02/05/23 12:47 AM
3

Rumors are often unsubstantiated claims of questionable behaviour and humans seem to have a thirst for lynch behaviour on any excuse.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 12:43 AM
16

You also missed out on potential false allegations that could completely wreck your life, including sending you into sufficient depression to take your own life.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 12:37 AM
1

What's sad is that people have to bankrupt themself to get medical treatment.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:27 AM
1

If children are involved and she divorces you, aren't all assets effectively up for grabs for child support (which is really spousal support with whatever scraps she sees fit, thrown to the kids)? Men today should not even be cohabiting, let alone marrying as the risk of losing a substantial portion of your assets when a woman decides she deserves a part of them is high, especially when she can extort compliance by threatening a false allegation or three. Women have no obligation to provide men …
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:54 AM
3

Wear a female prosthetic under the kilt and see the shocked reactions. They will probably never do it again.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:59 PM
2

Only 0.5% of the population engages in criminal behaviour, yet its enough to have a whole justice system dedicated to it: it's not about all, most, many, or any other large number when it only takes 0.5% for it to be worth pursuing to reduce it down to zero.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:55 PM
2

There wouldn't be many reports because men are largely starved of enough sex, since its all about her needs, not his.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:47 PM
2

Standing up to people who make demands, like demanding to know what masculinity means in one word.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:43 PM
3

That's why sex being consensual one moment and then non-consensual the next and therefore rape, based on a womans moment to moment subjective feelings, is so bizarre.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:35 PM
1

Sounds to me like the pertinent aspect was a form deprivation of liberty and continued harassment: simply being uncomfortable does not mean someone else is acting in a criminal manner and the woman took the logical step of attempting to defuse her own discomfort by moving; the criminal aspect surely was preventing her from doing so.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:30 PM
6

How do you even look at a person "in a sexual way"? Looking is the passive process of capturing photons from an object to obtain information about that object. If the object does not want to be observed, then they need to stop emitting photons. I don't understand how you can capture photons in a sexual way unless those photons have a sex and you filter by sex: that's not something that was ever mentioned in Physics 101. However, I'm sure being paranoid would be something covered in Psychiatry 10…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:23 PM
2

I think society has become obsessed with anti-discrimination, when discrimination (ie personal choice) is at the heart of us all. Discrimination is only contentious when it deprives or advantages individuals within a group over something, based on perceived characteristics of that group that other groups that don't have those characteristics are not deprived or advantaged over. Personal choice only operates in the personal domain: in commerce, people rightly don't get to discriminate. Inequality…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 01:53 PM
82

When women have in-bias towards other women, whilst men are competitive and prepared to throw other men under a bus to get access to women, it's not surprising outcomes are predicated in the gynocentric majority. The only power men have is to withdraw their involvement in society and let the chips fall where they may. In a sense it would be mutually assured destruction, but then that principle has prevented nuclear war for quite some time. Society has to first accept that he who can destroy a th…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 01:26 PM
53

It won't be about circumcision as that would involve a battle with powerful religious interests, which is still necessary, but which Trump won't want to contest.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:58 AM
8

And society is heading back that way with cat calling and wolf whistling by men now being criminal harassment if not examples of sexual violence. It's only one small step for groups to feel vindicated in taking justice into their own hands against criminals as a public service as lynch mobs.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:25 AM
1

Human beings are still fundamentally animals with a veneer of reasoning and moderation over their primitive emotional instincts. Animals are all biology, which is largely eat, sleep, sex (and its consequences) which we have inherited. It's not an obsession with sex, it's largely what we are about because of how sexual reproduction was tied into the general reward system of biology. Or rather, I should say it is what men are largely about, because women have a different fundamental agenda about h…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:21 AM
2

Yes, a perpetual victim is different from someone who views the situation as just their lot in life.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:06 AM
1

The statistics are already biased by virtue of men in general wanting more sex than women because of their innate sex drive through testosterone: therefore women will inevitably have more "unwanted sexual contact" than men, because for men it would often be "wanted sexual contact" if women approached them. Sexual coercion hasn't been defined so its not possible to tell if there are any inherent gender biases in that either. I don't put faith in statistics that assume men and women are the same w…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 04:04 AM
13

By rights, everyone should be in r/Egalitarianism as a focus, but it would not be appropriate to talk about specific mens rights or womens rights there, because its equal rights for all, so r/MensRights serves as an expose and discussion of rights that men don't have but women do and where a rebalancing is required. You can't describe what rights men are missing out on without discussing womens rights, which is why what women do feature prominently in a sub talking about mens rights. We should a…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:45 AM
10

The screenprinter mistakenly forgot the i in "run" when they made the t-shirts. Everyone was created by the universe through the miracle of life: that explicitly creates a place for them and as a unique creation, they matter. It doesn't matter what the creations think about others, only that the creator thought they mattered enough to be created. Use that as your solid foundation and build up from there. Women can flap their lips as much as they like, but it doesn't change the worth and place of…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:31 AM
4

She'll probably counter that lesbians are expressing masculine characteristics, so its still all "men" that are the problem.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:28 AM
1

What are your fundamental needs (not the perceived solution to your needs)? Is it actually intimacy with another person or mainly sexual fulfillment? Fulfillment can be achieved without a partner by exploring beyond standard masturbation. Intimacy can be experienced with men too, except most men have to get over the entrenched homophobia in society. Many gay men are open to sex and even intimacy with straight men. Unconditional love (not sex) can be had with a dog, if you are prepared to look af…
/r/MensRights26/04/23 03:51 PM
4

It's just a continuation of women getting whatever they want without attendant responsibility over the consequences to men, other women and society in general. If men were to refuse to work with women because of the safety issue, then an all-women team would be less effective in protecting the community including women and men: women are cutting off their nose to spite their face because they aren't rationally considering consequences. It's not just #MeToo, its #MeMeMe. However, men are struggli…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 02:07 AM
3

It's not that, government has their eye on the 10% GST they get from registered prostitution business at a time when public revenues are less than public expenditure.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 01:59 AM
1

Who owns the house? If its in the Father's name, he could instigate a separation and ask her to move out of his house, leaving the two of you there. However, false accusations on her part could be used to kick the two of you out instead.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 01:50 AM
1

But are you free to call any woman a cunt just because you are angry, not that she necessarily has been (except in your emotionally heightened subjective view)? Even in a no-equal world, people seem free to hurl insults at each other as though that solves anything.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 01:00 AM
8

However "it's not about the nail" according to female psychology. There's a disconnect between the way men and women operate that I don't think is ever going to be changed, because its fundamental to their distinctive biologies (as much as it can be in a diverse universe) only accommodated. We don't know with certainty why women want taller men and perhaps that is not important, only the presence of that requirement which somehow needs to be accommodated without it harming men as a consequence. …
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:59 AM
7

I think maybe men and women have got it all wrong, being so impressed with the human ability to reason, they think it overrides biology. Both men and women exhibit biological principles without thinking: we don't think ourselves to sexual arousal, for example, it happens naturally through stimuli of our natural biological selves. In a similar way, I believe womens selection criteria are fundamentally instinctual, like hair tossing and other non-thinking automatic responses. Likewise, men's sex d…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:54 AM
9

Women have no reason why they choose height as a selection criteria, they aren't "thinking" about this in a rational sense, it's a subconscious expression. All in my opinion of course. Unless they want tall partners to see over the heads of other shorter people like themselves, to give them a better view by proxy.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 08:06 AM
5

If I meant all, most, many, some, few or none women, I would have said so.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 07:39 AM
1

It's not a free country, there is a Constitution with rights (to prevent someone freely abusing the rights of another) and legislation to punish people for going beyond the rights and freedoms allowed. No-one can have whatever they want: it's all constrained by choices and consequences, except women don't believe in consequences for their choices.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 02:55 AM
50

insanely insensitive to the needs of women or children or flat out incompetent lovers or companions Women don't owe men sex (or sensitivity to their needs) and thus neither do men owe women sensitivity to their needs or competency.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 02:18 AM
81

Women hate short men because it deprives them of the ability to be dominated without being physically dominated, whenever they wish: height provides a passive domination effect that can be turned on or off at will in a womans mind, completely under her control.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 02:16 AM
1

No need to be sorry: it's an interesting inconsistency in our justice system, which is why I commented on it.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 05:18 AM
6

Pursue egalitarianism, not mens rights, womens rights or children's rights: there are fundamental rights that should apply to all people. Feminism made the mistake of pushing advantage for women (to counter perceived disadvantage compared to men) instead of pushing equal rights for all and now they have overcorrected and are still going strong in that direction. They also conveniently ignored that rights also come with responsibilities. The MensRights sub essentially exists to identify where men…
/r/MensRights23/04/23 04:12 AM
1

Is this what relationships have become: only about what you can get out of a partner? I think very few people are actually "in love": they are infatuated with what they can get out of a relationship for themselves. If they were in love, they would be joined to their partner, body and soul, for as long as that love lasted.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:50 AM
2

Society really needs a fundamental right of bodily sovereignty including tissues to cover this and many other associated issues in a non-gendered way. It could even be used to cover physical assault in all its forms.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 08:41 AM
3

We still don't really know if the trauma of circumcision is internalised in the subconscious and later exhibited as PTSD of some kind with associated anti-social behaviour that we currently can't explain. How anyone could put an infant through such a horrendously traumatic thing for relatively petty reasons is beyond my comprehension.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 08:36 AM
1

Parents often thought or were convinced by "professionals" or "experts" who should know that they were doing the right thing under the circumstances; that the boy wouldn't miss it; that he would look like his peers and not be bullied; that he would look like his Father and not lack identification; that it was more hygienic and would prevent medical issues later in life; that they were conforming to societal expectations; etc. So parents aren't necessarily the evil people we might think them, jus…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 08:29 AM
2

Courts decide on guilty or not guilty beyond reasonable doubt, they never say "innocent" because they can only determine guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Someone can be found not guilty, because of lack of evidence, whilst still actually having done the crime. It's interesting, however that we have presumption of innocence, when innocence does not feature at all in the justice system: it's all about guilt. Perhaps that is because it is impossible to prove innocence, but not impossible to prove g…
/r/MensRights22/04/23 08:08 AM
1

You can't extrapolate your own experience to the rest of mankind and expect it to be true.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 07:44 AM
-2

Girls might be raped the minute they stepped out the door alone, by all those toxic men and boys. /s
/r/MensRights22/04/23 07:38 AM
9

It happens way before that when their bodies are disrespected through circumcision.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 07:35 AM
12

Any boy that was circumcised for a non medical reason that could not be addressed any other way, never received love, let alone unconditional love. How any parent could allow that to be done to a baby and then in the next breath talk about love is beyond my comprehension.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 07:30 AM
1

If someone wants to pick a fight, they will often goad the other party into participation and then it can escalate until someone makes a mistake and than bam. Choosing not to participate through reason is the primary way to prevent escalation. Many people aren't trying to pick fights, but miscommunication through subjective misinterpretation will often start one, particularly when being unreasonably paranoid about everyones intentions.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 01:56 AM
1

Have you bothered to explore your own body's potential for multiple orgasms or full body orgasms, or have you only ever practiced penile stimulation? It doesn't even require a partner. Why is it always the gold standard with women and never anything else? Even blowjobs can be enjoyable and they don't necessarily require a womans lips. At its most fundamental, it's about sexual stimulation of the male body, which can be achieved in a variety of ways that don't involve women, because the mechanism…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 12:58 AM
2

Why should this even be necessary in a society supposedly based on human rights and reason? That the Constitution of the USA can be so corrupted that it requires counter-balancing legislation is incredibly concerning.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:48 PM
1

Emotions are womens fatal flaw, they are going to do something so monumentally egregious as a knee-jerk emotional reaction, when pushed far enough, it is likely to garner greater support against their unreasonable behaviour; but its going to cost.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:46 PM
12

That's womens modus operandi now: goad a man until he commits a crime and can be punished, allowing her greater access to his assets, knowing she won't be criminalised for goading. Men need to start using their reason and knowing this is a possibility now, to end the relationship once the goading begins, before it escalates to the point that his own emotion overwhelms reason. Better still don't cohabitate or otherwise give a woman access to your assets that can then be taken away from you by var…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:37 PM
2

Unless everything you say includes reasoned responses to every possible interpretation, which is simply not practical, you can never limit miscommunication when subjective emotional interpretation of the source is involved: aka, its possible to pick a fight over anything, regardless of the communication. Man: "you are looking lovely tonight" Woman: "so I didn't look lovely last night?"
/r/MensRights20/04/23 11:25 AM
1

It is when men are largely designed with an inherent sex drive focused on women for biological sexual reproduction: it's absence creates frustration and associated emotions that are damaging if maintained for long periods.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:24 AM
4

I think that is ridiculous in a judicial system that believes in the principle of innocent until proven guilty: punishing someone based on accusation alone is more "guilty until proven innocent". Shadow justice systems should not be permitted for any wrongdoing that carries a punishment as they need due process protections for innocent people. At least repeating a year should be a breeze.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:20 AM
0

I believe men's only natural defense is physical intimidation: it doesn't actually have to lead to violence to shut down the abusive party by facing them with greater strength and consequences of tackling with it. But as you say, even physical intimidation to oppose other abuse is now criminal, so out of bounds. Men have traditionally used physical intimidation to cause other men to back down, because both know the consequences of superior strength, so it doesn't always have to come to blows. I …
/r/MensRights20/04/23 05:09 AM
2

No, it matters what people interpret, however subjective interpretation by someone else is out of the control of the source. The problem is when people deliberately interpret everything as the most extreme interpretation possible so they can attack it for its extremism, even though the source may have meant it in a different way. Many people now just jump on the most extreme interpretation they can find to be offended and have power over the source: they don't even bother to think what other rea…
/r/MensRights20/04/23 04:59 AM
1

Many men are no longer getting access to the gold standard, so I hope they are more open to something that may be less but still better than sexless. There are more options available than only gold standard or nothing.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 02:29 AM
1

Well, if you haven't actually tried anything else, how do you know what might feel better than a woman? We're not talking about gold standard here, just not sexless, If you are denied the experience of a woman, it's irrelevant that it might be the gold standard and spitting the dummy if its a woman or nothing.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:16 PM
-1

Men don't need to go sexless: there are plenty of options for sexual fulfilment that don't involve the choices of a woman, but most men have been conditioned up til now by tradition, habit and availability, plus an unhealthy dose of homophobia, to not explore beyond a very narrow definition of sexual expression. Even in relationships with women, how many men explore beyond vanilla penis-vagina stimulation for their own benefit or find women comfortable with it not all about being about her? If w…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 12:27 PM
3

Women fear the wolf in sheeps clothing effect infiltrating their women-only spaces that can no longer be guaranteed to keep males out.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:41 AM
1

If you were both actually in love, politics would not matter and neither of you would be pursuing it, certainly not to the point of saying cruel things you did not mean or exaggerating to have a win. I think most people are in lust with an unrealistic expectation of a relationship, not in love in a relationship. It's strange, because history is replete with the concept of abandonment to love, yet you don't hear much about love now: it's simply a checklist of characteristics and common interests …
/r/MensRights19/04/23 06:28 AM
3

As an adult you don't have to listen to toxic behaviour and can choose to disconnect that from your life: you don't need to move country though to achieve that. Your Father also has the same choice, although because he is in a relationship which grants women the power to hold men hostage by various means, there are likely to be more consequences for him for leaving. Since you mention it has happened only recently, your Father may still find sufficient reason to continue the relationship. Also be…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:43 AM
1

Considering that nature has to drug men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful, it suggests the standard situation is incompatibility between the two. Therefore, if nature feels it is necessary to drug both participants for a successful outcome, then people should only be procreating when drugged (ie in love). I fear that most people these days are not having relationships when actually in love and the incompatibility is dooming the outcome. When people are in lo…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:14 AM
2

Small children haven't learned reason, it's a human potential that needs to be developed and exercised.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:11 AM
2

Which blood diamond appeals to you most my dear? Your guy won't know you love him unless ... doesn't quite seem to work the same way.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:07 PM
0

I believe women struggle with reason because it's not their first language (which is emotion and feelings as its tied to their biological role in sexual reproduction) and why should they when they can coerce, extort, incite, entice or otherwise get men to do it for them, or vilify them if its not what they want to hear?
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:02 PM
2

Men connect through shared activity, whilst women connect through shared gossip (ie doing versus communicating). Objects are also far more understandable to men because they have fixed characteristics that can be learned, whereas people are more inscrutable and harder to fathom, plus I believe women are biologically designed to more easily connect with expressed emotions to better understand a childs non-verbal needs and so find it easier to read people (function vs form?).
/r/MensRights17/04/23 01:40 PM
1

When I speak about nationalisation, its more about anti-privatisation and the opposite of blind individual selfishness which can be extended outside a nations borders too, not a them against us fervour. Climate change is going to be difficult to tackle because everyone still thinks in terms of blind individual selfishness, when the best deal has always been what is best for all (not what a minority determines is the best deal for all based on their own self-interest). I believe blind selfishness…
/r/MensRights17/04/23 12:11 AM
1

Are you sure it isn't the reverse: that political and social instability is what leads to populations in decline? Modern society is heavily dependent on its structure, which is becoming very vulnerable to global instability because of its global penetration. We have only really had population growth, generally, apart from pandemics and war and war is a deliberately manufactured thing. Nationalism is not a bad thing: it always was more about countries meeting their own needs first and then tradin…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 01:58 PM
4

Whining is the solution: it's designed to coerce someone else to do something to fix the problem, just to get it to stop (see "nagging").
/r/MensRights16/04/23 03:59 AM
0

The population is not going to collapse, it will just not continue to grow but will slowly decline, depending on the actual birth rate as people will still have children. Humanity was not in strife at even 25% of the present population and will not be so now or in the future. The decline will be so gradual that there will be time to implement workarounds in areas that might be affected, particularly through greater automation and technology and a re-assessment of what is important to people. Why…
/r/MensRights16/04/23 02:56 AM
0

Dolly was a failure as a living creature, riddled by illness, because we still don't understand the miracle of biology enough to be god. Why try to replicate sexual reproduction, when it works well enough in its current form, over a refusal to understand the differences and downsides inherent in sexual reproduction? It's a solution to the wrong problem. When nature has to drug men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be reasonably successful, it suggests the compatibility of…
/r/MensRights15/04/23 02:40 PM
4

Whoever decided pursuing conjugal rights was criminal whilst harassment to get what you wanted was a fundamental right.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 02:16 PM
2

Marriage contracts should outline the rights and responsibilities, including termination of the contract. If the rights of the child are important, I believe a marriage contract is essential to keep the parents together for the sake of the child's stable development, however surplus sexual/intimacy needs should be able to be pursued outside the marriage as long as they don't interfere with the marriage obligations. Marriage has always been about family and children, so I don't think anyone shoul…
/r/MensRights15/04/23 03:52 AM
2

Nature is based on perpetuation of the species, so it encourages individuals down that path. However, it actually needs to drug men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful, even with sex being pleasurable, which suggests how much of a sacrifice children are. Children being a sacrifice does not detract from the necessity of them for the species to continue. Society follows a similar plan which started out in balance, but which has seen the ability to workaround nat…
/r/MensRights15/04/23 03:04 AM
1

This is what you pay lawyers for to prepare for a court battle as they are the only ones who really know what improves your chances.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:35 AM
6

Isn't anyone else incredulous that an ex girlfriend wants to meet up with ex boyfriend, alone, when there is so much feminist attention on men assaulting women? What was she thinking to "put herself in harms way" like this? Unless it was a setup all along.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 04:13 AM
34

Men just can't win: either they are sex crazed or not sex driven enough; women most affected. Why does society imagine for an instant that every man should be a cardboard cutout stereotypical male? Hasn't anyone heard of biological diversity, seen the variation in penis size or womens breast size and genital shape/size? The topic shouldn't come as a shock to anyone who has been paying attention to the natural world.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 03:57 AM
3

The #MeToo movement is not a new development, it just used to be known as "jumping on the bandwagon for personal benefit". It's tragic, considering how overloaded the justice system already is, to further tie up valuable resources for alleged wrongdoing that should never have gone to trial in the first place; and its getting worse as more people jump on the revenge bandwagon, which can't be called "justice" when the punishment far outweighs the objective crime. The lethargy of the justice system…
/r/MensRights12/04/23 03:46 AM
5

Civilisation is based on reasoned progress: choice without some responsibility for the consequences (ie unrealistic standards) is a regressive path, but whether it will result in species extinction is another matter. What hubris to think human beings continued existence should be guaranteed: we destroy everything we touch and create imbalance in an essentially balanced universe. Human beings weren't about to go extinct in 1960 when world population was 3 Billion, so we can weather a reduction.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 05:48 AM
1

Women also rape women: it's unrealistic to focus on a specific group and to hunt down sparse information to support your discrimination whilst not extending the same criteria to other groups. Gender is now meaningless when it was determined to be whatever you identify with and thus dangerous and stupid to insist on single gender spaces it is not possible to police. Who could have guessed something like that might happen? It's kind of obvious to anyone with reason. The only solution is to have si…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 04:52 AM
4

Women and the men who support them, just threw biology under a bus.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:56 AM
5

However, harassment is now tending to include even the first approach, so you would be harassing her even before she responds (unless she finds you sufficiently attractive).
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:53 AM
2

This defies all the historical suggestions for how men could find women to date, including from women themselves. What society has not done is unequivocally issued an updated memo based on a reasoned appraisal of a win-win outcome. Instead, women have issued a unilateral unreasoned edict about what they think they want. Personally, I hope every man gives women what they want and don't hassle them for sex, but go their own way in life and think outside the box (sic). Women should be careful what …
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:50 AM
3

0.5% of the population commit crimes that are sufficient to require a major response. Do we just say "most people don't commit crime" and ignore crime? Most men don't assault women and yet women treat men as all potential rapists.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:37 AM
2

Agree, however there is still scope for individuals to do what they choose to do through their own individual sense of ethics, morality, etc.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:34 AM
1

The OP was about womens spaces, not every individual person. If the spaces women want had individual facilities, they could become non-gendered facilities and as I understand gyms and other similar spaces, they don't operate 1:1, so we don't need separate facilities for every individual on the planet. It's much easier to police breaking consent to access an individual facility than it is a gendered space where gender can't be questioned or verified.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:20 AM
1

Not really: trying to equate the brutal rape and potential murder of women with paranoia that trans-women will do the same to them in womens spaces is not equivalent. There is a possibility that the flexibility in gender identity and prevention of it being questioned, which has developed in society, might allow not-women to dress up as women and invade womens spaces in order to commit wrongdoing against those women, but I think it is a low risk. I think women should be advocating for personal sp…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 03:12 AM
49

As difficult as it is to accept, the justice system is based on evidence of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, not whether a crime actually happened or not. If there is not enough evidence, then an accusation will not be successful, even if it was true. What has been happening though is that the threshold for a crime beyond reasonable doubt has been lowered to make it easier to win an accusation, which is not justice because it makes it makes false accusation easier to achieve but doesn't prove th…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 02:57 AM
2

Standing for women’s rights to privacy and safety is not transphobic, it’s just a recognition of the reality that both sexes need and deserve their space. If its a reality that both sexes need and deserve their space, shouldn't women be standing for egalitarian rights to privacy and safety and killing 2 birds with one stone? If only standing for womens rights (against men I might add), how do men's spaces or spaces for other genders happen? Women having their own space does not automatically cre…
/r/MensRights09/04/23 02:22 AM
1

No, men are the product of our societal environment: if we have been conditioned to put women on a pedestal and protect them, whilst competing against other men and finding ways to advantage ourselves over them, whilst also being influenced by self-preservation, it's difficult to oppose all that to protect men. Calling it cowardice just feeds into the deliberate destruction of all things male. Realistically, I don't even think it is women per se that men are conditioned to protect, but procreati…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 02:59 AM
1

Not every man is necessarily the same as you because of their own individual life experiences. If it is as important to you as you say it is, I would have thought you would have taken some direct action yourself.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 02:40 AM
1

Women have in-group bias despite pecking for superiority: when it's a threat to all women, they stick together. Men on the other hand are conditioned to be competitive towards other men and to protect women: they aren't cowards, they are generally conditioned not to assist other men get ahead of them. Only in certain situations are men trained to watch each others back. If those men had stood up for the young man, they would have received similar treatment and their own lives likely ruined as we…
/r/MensRights08/04/23 02:31 AM
1

Women cower behind the patriarchy they so despise: they get simps to act to protect them by creating a justice system that favours women and basically emasculate men's strength, then they incite violence or issue false accusations to get men locked up who refuse to be subservient. Women immediately turn to the protection of police or other male dominated institutions (so called patriarchy) when threatened; they cry "rape!" to elicit help instead of fighting back. Women have created themselves a …
/r/MensRights08/04/23 01:43 AM
1

I never said "ridiculous". Please stop with the misrepresentations.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 11:30 AM
3

I wasn't trying to be medically accurate, just maintaining the analogy so people don't derail the point with "apples and oranges" like you just did.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 10:50 AM
-2

Do you love women for being their average selves (whatever that is) or for being compliant/congruent with what you want? Lets face reality: men and women both want something from each other and traded for it in the past. What we have now is women wanting it all without effort on their part, to be provided by men as slaves. Men need to ask themselves what it is that women most covet and to choose to not give them that or provide avenues where it can be taken. Passive resistance was used successfu…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 10:42 AM
1

At its most basic, life is an experiment by nature with the sole purpose of keeping the experiment going. Human intelligence is to find meaning and happiness in that life and money does not buy happiness, it just gets constantly devalued requiring the slaves work harder just to stay still. Look towards what fundamentally provides happiness: it can be the simplest of things that doesn't even require money and its probably unique to everyone.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 10:39 AM
4

Self preservation is a very strong instinct: it leads to some animals gnawing off their own limbs in order to save themselves; saving others is lower on the list of priorities. It's amazing some humans will risk their own lives to save others in the presence of this natural instinct. These men are not cowards and selfishness is different from self-preservation. Women have no reason: by destroying this young mans life in revenge of a trivial short term subjective issue, they have deprived a woman…
/r/MensRights07/04/23 05:36 AM
23

Girls ear piercings are the equivalent of boys ear piercings: personal choices. Forcibly removing the male foreskin (circumcision) is closer to forcibly removing a females ear lobe: it's the forced removal of a body part against their wishes which is the problem. How do we feel about the forced harvesting of organs again?
/r/MensRights07/04/23 05:06 AM
18

That was triggering for me in a similar, although not as bad, situation many years ago. It's so sad that nothing has changed in all that time. I think this is why education should be taken online in the home with parental supervision for far greater efficiency and automatic segregation of physical troublemakers. Whilst it doesn't prevent verbal abuse, electronic vibrations in air or squiggles on a display are much easier to block and ignore through greater ego strength. It's not female power, it…
/r/MensRights06/04/23 05:23 AM
3

I'm suggesting, not being rude, that you get off your arse and search the sub for the answers that have already been provided, not expecting them to be handed to you on a silver platter as is the expectation of womens privilege. Asking means choosing not to respond to the request or responding in a way you may not like, is an option.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 02:09 AM
1

Is learning intelligence though, especially when the input data may be objectively erroneous? Even animals learn through experience but they aren't intelligent like humans.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 01:31 AM
3

It does suck, but an individual can not contend with a solid brick wall and men are a minority against the women and simps making that wall: discretion is the better part of valour. Men have always had to sacrifice for womens privilege going right back to Eve: we should understand the situation and dilemma created by biology by now and accommodate it as best we can as reasoned beings by seeking that elusive win-win outcome, because women won't.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 01:12 AM
6

If anyone leaves their belongings you take them to the front desk as that's the most obvious place for them to look: what's up with telling people to steal them?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:28 PM
10

Men tell Tik Tok feminists not to assume the sky is falling in every encounter with men and to rationally consider the percentage of encounters with people over their life that have resulted in a significant negative outcome and then use that to predict the likely outcome of any future encounter. Assuming the worst outcome in every encounter is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Do women with children really believe that every man who approaches them wants to do them harm? Should never have a relations…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:18 PM
1

Why is anyone listening to ChatGPT as some sort of guru? It's a garbage in garbage out engine with no actual intelligence.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 02:11 PM
4

You can't fight preference, so don't even try: stop banging your head against the same brick wall hoping for a different outcome; if it's not height, the excuse will be something else and the goalposts will change at the next full moon due to fads and influencers anyway.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 06:53 AM
12

Don't create any more ex's and move to a State where you don't have an ex and live your life without women: the juice is no longer worth the squeeze when there are other options for obtaining the fundamental elements of a life.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 06:29 AM
0

It's not directed only at you, because this is a discussion topic not your personal support group. So, you are happy to be baby-trapped without consent, as long as it is your offspring?
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:19 AM
4

Nature will impose balance way before that, even if it is with a brutal sledgehammer. Mouse utopia studies suggest that overpopulation triggers a longer term corruption of the reproductive process that obliterates the problem: males spend endless time preening but not pursuing females and females lose the interest in looking after their offspring. I think we are seeing the start of that in humans.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 04:09 AM
1

Whilst feminism remains only about rights then it is a flawed movement as rights must always be matched with responsibilities. In other words, rights can't exist in isolation as they tend to conflict with other rights. Rights aren't the absolutes people make them out to be.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:57 AM
1

Egalitarianism is about equality: feminism wasn't needed to pursue egalitarianism, but it was necessary to pursue womens advantage. It's all in the name, regardless of splutterings to the contrary. Men and women can never be equal except in very fundamental ways related to outcome as they are so intrinsicly different and ultimately incompatible: nature has to drug men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful; that says volumes to me about how compatible and equal m…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:46 AM
0

Being there for trans men is discriminatory when trans men are not men: a man is an adult male and trans men are trans men, whilst trans women still have male DNA and deserve just as much support. In fact men should be there for everyone because their biological role is protector: of family when alone and group when in society. We should be stopping this arbitrary categorisation of gender when we are in reality a diverse species with each individual equally important by reason of their being bro…
/r/MensRights04/04/23 03:11 AM
9

There's something deeply disturbing about choosing the most extreme interpretation of something that can have more than one.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 02:16 AM
10

If subjective offense becomes the criteria for wrongdoing, then there can be only one person standing at the end, with everyone else cancelled: slippery slopes lead to singularities.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 02:05 AM
50

Right, guilty until proven innocent (except no-one wants to prove you innocent): it's a reversal of the justice system and simply a way to cancel people you don't like.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:59 AM
4

Insults or "no" break the sub rules of "dont play the man" and "poor quality commentary". Men's greatest strength is their ability to reason and to break problems down into their more manageable component parts. It's why men should be able to find alternatives to women in what they fundamentally want in life and break the monopoly power that women currently have.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:54 AM
3

The crime rate is around 50 per 100,000, yet that small percentage of people are enough to require a justice system to prevent its detrimental impact on society. It doesn't take many bad apples to be an issue and its far smaller than a minority.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:44 AM
3

So, is there a definitive test that outs a brigading feminist they can't avoid that we can use? That is, something they can't help themselves responding to in an obvious way through impulsive emotion with no moderation through reason.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:39 AM
1

Was there never any suggestion of the morning after pill for unprotected sex, or early stage termination? Given your paranoia, I was expecting multiple forms of contraception combined with a backup plan to backup plans to prevent children you didn't want. Whilst men are so blase about conception, because women have ways and means of achieving it even in the face of opposition, men will continue to be baby-trapped.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 01:36 AM
1

If curiosity and intellect drove humanity, we would not have stopped at going to the moon: that was just another race for supremacy. We would not continue to invade other countries for ego or resources, because its not in the long term interests for humanity in a limited world. No, we are still driven by base instincts with a veneer of intelligence. If we were intelligent, we would have predicted climate change and done something about it a long time ago. We still are constrained by feudalism as…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 11:28 AM
3

Weakness destroys the ability of a man to perform his biological role as protector of continuation of the species. Women instinctively know this as evidenced by their actual reaction to weakness in a man and pursuing the bad boys, versus what they think they want: it's important to understand this. We can't separate our underlying biology from our reason or fantasy, only try to maximise a win-win outcome from the combination. It's also important to understand that human beings are diverse and wh…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 03:02 AM
7

Men looking primarily for sex and women looking for the best sperm donor, ATM and protector they can find: the two are simply not compatible as the standards for one are much higher than the standards for the other and only women control the outcome, hence the number disparity. Some people seem to think that awareness and intelligence somehow invalidates our biological origins: it does nothing of the sort as its just a thin veneer over those foundations. Intelligence suggests 80% of women select…
/r/MensRights03/04/23 02:31 AM
14

No guarantee that all female judges are reasonable as they have to work within the laws which may be deliberately biased. It would take a very principled and courageous person to bend the rules to reduce inbuilt bias.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 02:13 AM
1

You mean like #killallmen? I don't see men doing the exact same thing. The overall crime rate is something like 50 per 100,000 and is very concerning to society, yet 50 is such a small number, the opposite of most or many. It doesn't take many people to create an issue that is problematic for society. It's not necessary to generalise about a group of people when 50 per 100,000 is a serious issue in society.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 02:08 AM
-1

It's one thing joining you for your journey for the long haul and another to join your journey for what advantage she can get and then moving on to the next victim. Marriage vows used to specifically include "for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health" to combat the good time Charlenes, but that all went the way of the Dodo when conjugal obligations were removed, upsetting the ability to keep the balance of the implicit trade between both parties.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 01:51 AM
13

Women are adult female humans by definition: the OP may have an issue with pre-adult girls too, which makes "females" an appropriate identifier. Given the context of "heterosexual" the OP is obviously talking about human females. Why the insinuation the OP is into bestiality, given the context? That's trying to incite trouble.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 01:46 AM
25

MeToo was not a coincidence, it was enabled by social media acting like a world-wide gossip column allowing women everywhere with access to see what worked for some of the female explorers and to rinse-repeat. Women everywhere were already skilled at derailing reasoned argument by making it subjectively emotional, their biological modus operandi, and twisting men around their little finger into simps, learned from Mom.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 12:45 AM
1

And some people wonder why MGTOW is a thing. Women are dangerous because they have no sense of responsibility, accountability or consequences and they are able to persuade simps to make laws in their favour that criminalise any offense against their subjective feelings. Once the law becomes more about unreasonable subjective feelings and less about reasonable objectivity, civilisation has already started to decline because it is losing the power to reason.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 01:24 PM
-10

Today, the gender of a person can not be known unless they tell you, so its safer to take the default position of the gender being unknown. We still rely on appearance and our translation of that to gender or even sex, when it is dubious at best in the 21st Century. In any case, gender is irrelevant except to intimate partners, so lets leave it out in public: everyone is a diverse individual with unknown gender. If certain characteristics are required for a job, hire based on those characteristi…
/r/MensRights02/04/23 04:44 AM
6

Is this the same promise as was expressed in previous studies that was quietly withdrawn because of unacceptable side effects? Don't tell me about it until its ready for distribution as I can't take all the disappointments in life after getting my hopes up.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 04:37 AM
7

Woman who sees all sharks as a potential threat to her life, douses herself in chum and dives into the ocean.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 03:44 AM
6

Getting laid is always under the sword of Damocles with the potential threat and consequences of false accusation, baby-trapping and resource extortion.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 03:31 AM
3

It may also have been an attempt to fraudulently use your sperm without your consent and make you responsible for the outcome, but the government doesn't want to recognise that possibility either. Men need to have sex and then sleep in another room with a locked door to better protect themselves.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 03:14 AM
1

Some countries are also toying with menopause leave for older women.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 12:20 PM
1

Tubal ligation: it's just that the tubes are unusually located in the unusual labia.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 12:17 PM
1

Womens rights, mens rights, gay rights, trans rights, ... are the problem as they fragment and divide when what is important are fundamental human rights that transcend gender distinctions and gender based discrimination.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 08:34 PM
7

A Mothers broken heart: just more emotional manipulation, coercion and guilt-tripping of men to do what women want for their own selfish ends, not what men want for themselves. It isn't like the Mother will bear any of the burden of raising grandchildren, whilst getting the benefit. Grandparents should have done a better job the first time round instead of expecting another bite at the cherry.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 01:38 AM
7

Why should men even need to be alone: has no-one heard of male friendships, let alone the bromances that would develop if we shed this constricting homophobia conditioned into men by society? You might be thinking "yuck" because of sexual orientation and conditioning, but you will be amazed how things can change when the choice becomes narcissistic manipulative women or nothing for many men.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 01:36 AM
12

With all the emphasis on fair trade agreements, society is deliberately facilitating an unfair trade agreement in womens favour: she expects a child from his sperm and child support from his labour but he is denied any equitable benefit of the child in exchange. If this was a trade contract, it would never be signed without coercion or being under duress and society continues to facilitate this extortion.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 09:34 AM
0

Relationships have always existed as a reasonable trade or exchange of benefits due to the complementary natures of men and women. What has changed is the value assigned to those benefits and the reality of society assuming the role of providing some of those benefits for one gender but not the other. It was inevitable that sex would eventually cease being a tradable element when protection and provision of resources was taken over by society instead of being provided by individual men, however …
/r/MensRights29/03/23 09:21 AM
13

That's unspeakably abhorrent and wouldn't it come under the auspices of the 13th Amendment regarding involuntary servitude, the 9th regarding unenumerated rights, the 8th regarding cruel and unusual punishment and possibly the 4th regarding seizures. On the face of it, it seems unreasonable to arbitrarily determine the capacity of someone to labour for anothers benefit without allowing that person determination of their own labour.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 08:40 AM
37

If done with kids, both should have had a tubal ligation else they are gambling with their futures. A shame he already has kids: if he didn't one of the options is to reduce income to the barest level so she actually has to work to support the kid she has custody of. Men can live on very low incomes if they have to and its the only revenge they have access to.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 05:20 AM
1

Challenge your interpretation of what life should be: in a universe of wonders, the attentions of a woman are not the be-all-end-all of existence. In nature, many males only briefly hookup with females once a year if they are lucky and live the rest of their life on their own doing their own thing: it's not that uncommon, so you are in good company. Stop and smell the roses for a change: delight in the magnificence of a simple flower. Explore the inner world as well as the outer world. There are…
/r/MensRights28/03/23 04:13 AM
3

Which is fine if she can get slim/athletic men to prefer her, but if not, not okay for her to label those men as misogynistic, incel or whatever for their preferences. People don't owe you your preferences.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:59 AM
2

For most men, their "life" consists of conditioned expectations of a relationship, sex and children with a special woman and living happily ever after: it's completely dependent on women, unfortunately, and without womens selection, society doesn't offer any other alternative life for men. I'm not convinced its going to get better, that's just fantasy hopes and dreams, but I do think its going to get much worse, requiring men to adapt to survive.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 01:05 AM
7

What is there to move on to for men who are deprived of expression of their sex drive and labelled "untouchable" by women? You can kind of understand the bitterness and other emotions stemming from being labelled "incel" as a vilification.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 03:10 PM
5

It's a complex situation to be able to have preferences, yet those preferences mean some people will be excluded as a result: you can't force people to relate to those they don't prefer and there is no point because there will only be resentment. It may be possible to convince some to alter their preferences in exchange for a better outcome than if they stuck to them, because they just didn't understand the consequences, but I feel that will be pushing a rock up a hill in most cases. The only pr…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 03:02 PM
4

That contradicts "beyond a reasonable doubt" unless there is overwhelming evidence that anything the accused says will not change the outcome through reasonable doubt. If the court relies on silence as an admission of guilt, then that guilt is doubtful, especially as the presumption of innocence is supposedly in play. You can't have it both ways. Explaining motivation for not talking is potentially incriminating oneself and the 5th amendment prohibits being compelled to incriminate oneself, so o…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 02:44 PM
6

According to wikipedia: Notwithstanding popular misconceptions, the Court held that the FifthAmendment does not establish a complete right to remain silent but only guarantees that a criminal defendant may not be forced to testifyagainst himself or herself. Therefore, as long as police do not deprivedefendants of the opportunity to claim a Fifth Amendment privilege,there is no Constitutional violation. The Court stated that there was no "ritualistic formula" necessary to assert the privilege aga…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 01:29 PM
5

Mighty oaks don't grow without a seed, so without the foundational trauma from women, men wouldn't become misogynistic.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 12:56 PM
4

Infinity, which is what women effectively want in full control over any discomfort, is impossible to achieve and gets harder the closer you approach it, even ignoring issues about ethics and reason.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 06:36 AM
1

Homophobia is fundamentally about identity: when men start behaving like women, it calls into question every man's identity with masculinity and being male and so men reject any question about it along with the source of that concern. It's kind of silly, because gay men are still fundamentally men apart from the attraction to dick. Behaviour exists across a spectrum from hypermasculine to screaming queen, with "straight acting" (which isn't an act) in the middle, so gay men aren't necessarily be…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 06:28 AM
0

The historical record doesn't support your hypothesis: women have been complaining for a long time about men falling asleep after sex when they wanted to cuddle and be intimate; if it wasn't about sex and the effort men are required to put into it, men probably would be cuddling, however that is not the reality of biology for men and so therefore it is primarily about sex. If cuddling was more important than sex to them, men would be cuddling instead. I don't think men have a touch deficit, I th…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 05:50 AM
4

According to some people, sexual harassment can include the first time someone is approached for something they don't want.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 05:39 AM
6

Why don't they just have a law against harassment that is non-gendered? It's applicable to far more than wolf whistling women, including women nagging in a domestic setting. Harassment must only be defined as continuation of an unwanted activity against a person after that person has expressed their opposition.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 01:20 AM
2

Hypothetical: the welfare office has mislaid the evidence you provided that disputes a reduction in welfare payment and your already below poverty income is going to be reduced on schedule as a result; you become frustrated and fearful over how you are going to live because of a welfare office mistake and your voice rises as you try to explain to the customer service officer; they feel unsafe and end the conversation, leaving the customer in dire circumstances as a result of a mistake not of the…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:08 PM
1

Healthcare workers don’t owe anybody anything Then what are they being paid for, their own health care?
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:06 PM
1

Abuse is abuse regardless of the reason behind it, That sounds very much like all abuse is identical, whether it is a slightly raised voice or other subjectively interpreted offense versus extreme physical violence. This all stems from the OP's situation of a receptionist alleging abuse to focus blame on the OP for her own incompetence and causing the OP serious consequences as a result. Whilst I don't agree with your assessment that witholding service in response to (unspecified) abuse is an ap…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 02:01 PM
2

I think most people have an encouraged, fixed expectation of what their life should be, based on tradition and habit and rarely question what it is that fundamentally constitutes a good life. Consequently when they can not achieve that template for whatever reason, there is frustration and despair as there is nothing else presented to take its place. Society doesn't want to specifically offer alternative life narratives, so you have to pursue them yourself. Think of yourself as an explorer of th…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 01:15 PM
2

It's absurd to equate all abuses as being equal just because they are called abuse: someone being abused through incompetent or malicious behaviour can be more impactful on vulnerable people than a raised voice on service staff. The causes of abuse are important if you want to do anything to stop it: simply abusing people for abusing you is not a solution and neither is threatening them with denial of service. If we know abuse is happening, why don't we tackle the cause and try to ameliorate the…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 12:47 PM
1

There has to be a sense of perspective and proportion when it comes to abuse and harassment: isn't it possible that people being accused of abuse and harassment are themselves responding in fear to the power of service providers to deny service for whatever reason and then being accused of abuse and harassment for potentially trivial reasons such as raising their voice from desperation, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy and a positive feedback loop but with disproportionate cause and effect? T…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 11:29 AM
1

That's very disturbing that subjective feelings can be used to deny medical care or other services to people in a completely disproportionate and revenge-like way considering many societal services are now so stretched that losing a care provider may make it very difficult to obtain another. Just like firing people from their livelihoods, built up through many years of effort, for a subjective feeling based accusation, without due process is ridiculous. A civilisation can not function in a state…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 05:43 AM
2

Brexit was the beginning of the end for the UK.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:49 AM
5

Whats the wager that harassment will be extended to cover men avoiding women by crossing the street or giving up their seat, because women feel offended? Someone, somewhere will be offended by whatever you say or do: that's not grounds for criminalising the source of the subjective offense simply because someone felt offended.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:36 AM
3

Regardless of proof it will clog up the system and cause it to collapse. Sometimes we need to let nature take its course.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:33 AM
3

There doesn't have to be a "what" for feminism, just a subjective emotion: a "what" would suggest reason which is not their agenda.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:25 AM
5

With power comes the possibility of corruption, hence also responsibility to reason your actions and not simply operate at a primitive emotional level.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:22 AM
5

Laws support rights and oppose wrongdoing: we need to push for greater fundamental human rights including non-discrimination and bodily sovereignty (including tissues), not greater group rights and discriminatory laws. It should all resolve in the wash if we have been diligent with rights and laws. Discrimination is fine at a personal level as long as it does not adversely impact on another (eg refusing to serve a customer because of personal subjective feelings): adversely impact does not mean …
/r/MensRights25/03/23 03:17 AM
2

However, the threat of revenge is itself evidence of a "crime" of sorts as threats, extortion, blackmail stem from the same source and themselves tend to be illegal. It's important to recognise what is happening to the principle of justice with the development of civil crimes that have lower standards of proof but high levels of revenge and punishment and are starting to be used instead of criminal justice. The corruption of Title IX is an example.
/r/MensRights25/03/23 12:12 AM
2

What was the purpose of the letter? If they suggested that your medical care would be terminated, based on accusation only, then they are possibly violating the Hippocratic Oath and you have evidence in writing. It is disturbing when someone in a position of power over your health or other aspects of your life starts using petty accusations against you, because you can no longer trust them to act in your best interests. You may not have evidence of the receptionists actions, but you do have an o…
/r/MensRights25/03/23 12:03 AM
4

Society is shifting to a system of revenge (aka lynch mob) and bypassing the system of justice with its checks and balances, as a shortcut. Alleged wrongdoing is now being handled by self-appointed judge/jury/executioner. Civilisation is being reversed in favour of revenge based on subjective feelings.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 11:42 PM
2

If you don't like it leave. And upset her, potentially leading to a false accusation for revenge. Or if with children or alimony provisions, having your body raped for 20 years for resources whilst you don't have access to your child or sex any more.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:15 AM
-1

Saying you have to leave is indirect and just sends mixed messages as it can be interpreted a number of ways: not as decisive as "I'm flattered by your attention however I'm not interested". Perhaps its deliberate as it doesn't burn bridges or create confrontation, but its equivalent to a "maybe". The friend was also white-knighting, hoping to get something out of it.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:09 AM
-15

Whilst you are fighting an ex for money, you are not spending that energy on the child: what is more important, your child or revenge masquerading as justice? I'm assuming your financial resources are sufficient if you were granted custody.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 01:41 AM
1

Not all women is a pointless response when the reality is that enough women are creating an issue for it to be damaging societal stability and the future of civilisation. It's above critical mass and a self-sustaining chain reaction that is trending towards runaway meltdown. There are good women out there, is effectively saying "F U I got mine". What about all those men (and women) being deprived of relationships and family because women have not only unrealistic selectivity criteria, but they a…
/r/MensRights21/03/23 01:29 AM
5

You can't reason with emotion, so there is no way forward together because you won't change the mind of those women who persist with an unreasonable approach and remain the problem and you won't change the simps who facilitate them. It's all very well to say what we shouldn't do yet not say what we should do that is practical and real. The way forward is to create fundamental human rights, not separate mens and womens rights, but in a democracy you need a majority to make that happen, which is j…
/r/MensRights21/03/23 12:47 AM
1

Biology normally leads men towards heterosexual expression because it all hangs together neatly that way (of course, its sexual reproduction at work), societal conditioning (ie that's what the majority are doing) and habit formation (ie no easily accessible alternatives due to homophobia) reinforces it. Note that boys learn to masturbate with a man and a mans body (even though it is their own) before they go chasing after girls, so it starts as pleasure seeking. Even when young men pursue girls,…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 05:13 AM
1

I think there is a lot of flexibility in sexual expression and really it is up to the individual, but I also believe that much of our expression is due to habit from a biological heterosexual foundation that is additionally reinforced by societal custom. For the longest time, biology and societal custom have been aligned meaning there was no need for anything else (ignoring diverse individuals), however recent history has actively worked against pleasurable sex (the 1700s and 1800s torture devic…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 02:05 AM
1

It's difficult to consolidate what I am saying into a few words: I'm suggesting one option of women considering whether a small sacrifice in having more sex than they might want in a relationship and lowering their standards for a relationship might have dividends in more men and women being able to have a relationship, less anger and frustration and thus less acting out, the overall stability of society and the possibility women might actually gain more than they lose; and another option of rec…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 12:14 AM
5

My comments are largely about women choosing not to have relationships (ie sex) with men because of unreasonable shopping list characteristics, thus creating relationship absent men and women which destabilises society: that is, they are choosing selfish and unreasonable thresholds of selection and not considering the effect on society as a whole, or even themselves, when good enough would create a much better outcome for all. It also relates to women villifying those men they don't choose for n…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 09:05 AM
3

Then there is the experience of men and sex in prison where I doubt they are all gay or bisexual. I think we conflate sexual reproduction with sexuality, when the smallest part of sexual expression is actually about reproduction. Even in nature, the animals aren't knowledgeably engaging in sexual reproduction, just following their instincts and what feels good. I read an article about a farming couple who talked about their boars and how the adolescent ones would discover how to masturbate: basi…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 05:48 AM
2

There's forcing and then there's facilitating a change of perception. Would women really prefer to hold out on a bunch of arbitrary characteristics on a checklist and not have any relationship, whilst crashing society because of the imbalance; or to have a relationship with a man who can still provide resources, a family, protection and sexual pleasure, keep society in balance and ensure most people get to have a good enough relationship; even if he doesn't tick all the boxes? Is it really worth…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:59 AM
2

The primitive emotions generate a rush of brain chemicals: I would hazard a guess that women are becoming drug addicts unknowingly because of their particular biological vulnerability to emotions.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:28 AM
11

Only men are being called incels and every woman that rejects having a relationship with a man because of arbitrary characteristics she decides are important , means one man and one woman without a relationship because of the balance of numbers.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:21 AM
12

Incel is a derogatory term: call black people by the N word and watch the anger spiral out of control. The involuntarily celibate did not choose that state of being, it was imposed on them (ie involuntarily) and considering celibacy in men is largely as a result of not having sex with women, then not choosing to not have sex with women must derive from women choosing not to have sex with men. Women choosing not to have sex with men results in a deprivation for those men and not unsurprisingly fo…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 04:11 AM
2

I'm not demanding women accept all sex either, there are plenty of ways that men could be offered greater opportunity of sexual expression without bothering women, but these are not pursued because various barriers to them exist, in part because of women's resistance. In my opinion, the fundamental issue is about control: women wanting to control men for their own benefit, which is not going to end with simply controlling mens sex drive. It's associated with power and corruption too. A civilisat…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 02:40 AM
1

Those things and more are sacrifices by men, regardless of how they come about, yet women aren't required to sacrifice anything at all for the benefit of men (such as their irrational selectivity which has societal consequences to many men and women). I have not suggested women just accept a mans sex drive to its full extent, I have suggested women should consider the situation from the bigger picture. Is sex so abhorrent that women would exchange the possibility of relationship and family for w…
/r/MensRights19/03/23 12:58 AM
1

My own interpretation is that a thread is not a private 1:1 conversation, but a hierarchy of connected opinions presented for the interest of the community to foster discussion and education about topics of interest: it's not meant to be directed to specific people but to the issues raised (hence the rules to not make it personal), even if the connection of an opinion to those issues or other opinions is not completely solid. The Forum should not try to be the thought, grammar or literary struct…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:02 PM
1

Sometimes my comments aren't completely related to a particular comment I respond to and are more general with a hint of connection, but it seems like the closest anchor point, so that is where I lay my hat. I don't get why some people think they own a comment and any response must only be to points made within that comment or interpreted to be directed specifically at that comment maker.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:20 PM
2

The higher the number, the less chance the person is looking for a long term involvement. A long term involvement is the goal because its most efficient in effort and human beings are fundamentally lazy. On the other hand, long term involvements require compatibility in a number of areas, so finding that compatibility through trial and error is going to lead to larger numbers, but that's all we have to work with. Perhaps then the anger is about how difficult it is to find compatibility thrown ba…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 12:11 PM
4

The worst part about this is that these are all children expected to be perfect adults in responding to situations, emotions and hormones they have no experience with or guidance to deal with, but punished after the fact as though they should instinctively or intrinsicly know better, despite society forcing every generation to go through a trial and error process millennia after millennia.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:31 AM
0

During Covid I think many people initially thought their dreams had come true, spending more time with the people they loved, but discovered it was actually a nightmare and provided an opportunity to really see the differences between people that are normally masked by greater distance apart. People should have an opportunity to experience a trial marriage without the commitment to see if their expectations are unrealistic, including a honeymoon and post-honeymoon period. The honeymoon period is…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 10:36 AM
2

Equality must also include responsibility, accountability, etc, not simply benefit. This is why feminists never supported equality, even when it was meant as equal benefit, because it never required equal responsibility. Feminism was only ever about advantage for women, pretending to be equality. It's now been extended to menstrual leave and menopause leave in various locations around the world as a way to be paid more for doing nothing in order to obtain enough income to raise children as sole …
/r/MensRights18/03/23 10:10 AM
4

Why are we so surprised when women twist the truth into contorted knots during arguments in order to win as a matter of course.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:57 AM
66

This is the modern incarnation of the lynch mob and its a danger to the stability of society. Anything that is not taken to the justice system needs to be ignored by society as the drama gossip that it is. If its important enough it should be a criminal act and be processed through the justice system with its checks and balances, not through kangaroo courts like Title IX. Not that the justice system is without its flaws, but its more just than a lynch mob that only works on primitive emotional i…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:38 AM
2

Do you not consider the plight of other men who might need fulfilment outside a constrained relationship but can't leave because of the financial punishment that would be applied, or does your own situation fill your entire perception of the real world outside?
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:13 AM
3

You think men living shorter lifespans, doing the most risky and dirty work, being considered disposable versus women being a protected species, being forced to provide resources despite not being given anything in return on the whim of a woman, being falsely accused and punished by the system whilst being innocent, demonised and villified for being born who they are, being deprived of sexual expression through womens choice and selectivity versus women only having to indicate interest, etc is n…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:08 AM
3

Well, the biological objective is to procreate to continue the species, so its not surprising that stopping contraception might lead to increased interest in procreation. A healthy well adjusted woman should at least match a mans sex drive when she is trying for a baby as that is how it is in normal biology. Human beings upset that balance by changing the normal biological process.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:57 AM
3

Men didn't ask for a sex drive: it's how men are wired by biology and embedded in their DNA; it's not their fault. Men can moderate their sex drive through reason, but being reasonable, why should men suppress something that is important to them for the benefit of someone else, when they are not getting a benefit from doing that for themself, in fact doing that is detrimental to their own interests? Why should men sacrifice what they want in order for women to have what they want, without women …
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:46 AM
0

Scotoma: we just can't see some things because they are in a blind spot for that person, whether that blind spot is a physical defect of vision or something deliberately maintained by refusing to accept any evidence for it (see the 3 wise monkeys: see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil).
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:15 AM
3

Men and women both like sex, but men also have a sex drive on top that women don't have, because of testosterone. I don't think there is any jealousy at all: an unequal sex drive gives a woman the ultimate power over a man, because she can hold out much longer than he can, because he has no directly equivalent alternative that he is permitted to pursue. Power corrupts, inevitably. Prostitution has been restricted forever to reduce that avenue; monogamy has been maintained by threat of legally ta…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:10 AM
1

And when a man wants sex its womens choice too: heads I win, tails you lose. The civilsed approach would be to recognise that both should have a choice over sex, but that choice comes with consequences on other people and theirs on you. The solution to one person wanting something and another person not should fundamentally be an exercise in a win-win outcome: the woman not getting the sex she doesn't want, but the man getting the sex he wants via a different mechanism (ie women not getting to c…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:03 AM
4

However, you were constrained by monogamy: if you had been allowed to have surplus sex outside the marriage but to still only want to love and have a relationship with her, would that have changed your life?
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:42 AM
7

I don't think your gender fluidity and personal experience qualifies you to speak on behalf or against men in a general sense. I disagree with your arguments: it's not men coming on too aggressively but women choosing men based on selectivity characteristics such as height, wealth, appearance, etc many of which are not within a mans control and even if they are, demanding someone do something in order to receive something they want can tend to extortion. It's not about men violently ravaging wom…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:38 AM
0

Mods could fix the problem by preventing downvoting and only allowing upvoting, then people could not cancel others through the voting mechanism.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:02 AM
-8

Does men's sex drive actually require something from women today, or is it just entrenched habit of millennia from a time it was biologically necessary? There has been no need to question whether women are actually necessary for the sex drive to be expressed, because up till recently it was relatively easy to obtain. Our populations are so large now, we can afford to not pursue procreation for many people for a while, but sex for its own sake is a different matter. The appearance of terms such a…
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:00 AM
0

You need reason to be able to understand cause and not just see effect. We didn't discover microbes through "muh feels". And women have difficulty with reason because primitive emotions get in the way more so than with men: it's part of their innate biology, so the reasoned among us should not be surprised. I'm not convinced women don't understand innate differences: they don't want to understand, because it destroys the victim narrative or whatever emotional narrative they are running in their …
/r/MensRights18/03/23 02:22 AM
5

There's no longer justice for men only revenge for women. Soon men will have no other option than to crash the system to end the abuse and force a reset.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 06:56 AM
1

And that is because of the agenda and the reality that women are far more communicative in general than men, especially if offended (and it doesn't take much to offend women).
/r/MensRights17/03/23 12:01 AM
1

It's a similar principle, except whatever you say or anyone repeats online or via other communications media, can be accessed by the justice system, so its effectively equivalent to talking to police. That video was produced by people who know what they are talking about and its an eye opener about how the most innocent sounding thing can be used against you in your naivity.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 11:58 PM
5

How many duds do you have to randomly go through though before you are lucky and just happen to find a good one? How long do you need to beat your head against that brick wall, hoping for a different outcome? There is no guarantee that the superficially "good" ones remain good either: having children changes many people (because I suspect it is radically different from the fantasy expectations going into it). It's said that women want to change their men whilst men want their women to stay exact…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 01:16 PM
2

I believe all this is predicated on the traditional principle of shunning, which in the past would be life threatening because being shunned by the tribe meant you were completely on your own. For women this would be certain death, partly because of their intense need for connection and belonging; for some men, not quite so much but still a major threat. So, women think that shunning men gives them power, but they are thinking like women where it does hold true, because women need to be protecte…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 01:04 PM
1

Reddit is a commercial entity with an agenda, it's not about creating strong healthy communities. If we want that we have to push for public forums whose defined objective is exactly that.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:41 PM
1

Men are expected to be the rock on which society depends for stability: they can't accept a man not being that rock because it undermines their own sense of stability. It's basically selfishness on the part of society to not allow men to be vulnerable or to be human. Everything would collapse without men: women don't see it just like you don't see the safety features in the engineering in the car you are driving, because it operates invisibly. I think if men were to have a strike, just to show h…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:35 PM
6

This is why you should never talk to police https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE where even something you might think is innocent and the truth can be used against you because you aren't aware of how it can be twisted around by a professional. Miranda rights always suggest "anything you say ... may be used against you ...". it doesn't say it will be used in your defense: that should be a big red flag right there. The police work for the Prosecution, not the defense. You are lucky to have …
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:06 PM
3

The presumption of innocence must be more than lip service: at the very least there should be compensation for the effects of robbing an innocent man of his freedom at any stage of the proceedings and contempt of court penalties arraigned against anyone using the judicial process for revenge. Justice must be for both accuser and accused in both directions or else it is not a just system.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 11:45 AM
1

She went to the bar, angry, possibly had sex, but wanted the OP to have sex to confuse paternity and was so desperate that she tried to extort sex through abuse of a child. It's possible the pregnancy is the OP's child from sex beforehand, but I don't think it is a certainty: if she was already pregnant, sex would not have been vital on that day. Regardless of feminist screechings, pregnancy is the ultimate responsibility of women as only they can grow a child and since they didn't obtain consen…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 11:36 AM
4

Revolution? No, it's simply an impulsive dummy spit without reason that men should not be repeating. Women will hoist themselves by their own petard soon enough, but they are going to take the rest of society down with them in the process.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 02:06 PM
0

Whilst we shouldn't conclude that this particular person was guilty of the alleged crimes, we can treat it as a hypothetical based on the information to hand: if it was true, what would be the implications, double standards, hypocrisy, etc suggested by the events.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 02:14 PM
1

Not to mention coercion in reducing access to sex if women don't get what they want, to extort compliance.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 02:08 PM
2

Not necessarily, she probably learned behaviour from her Mother and other women and/or they never stopped her in the past, so they are partly responsible for facilitating criminal behaviour. I remember decades ago about the admonishment to count to 10 before acting on emotional impulse. It was wisdom, yet you don't hear any parents encouraging that reason-moderating-impulse step more recently. If they had drilled it into mens and womens heads, perhaps she would not have struck him with the lamp …
/r/MensRights14/03/23 02:04 PM
7

It's not a wage gap but an income gap: income = wage x hours; if you work less or work at a more lowly paid job you get paid less, businesses are not charities. Women have a lower average income than men because they choose lower wage jobs and they often work less hours due to having children, period leave, etc. Arguably its the dirtier, more dangerous jobs that pay more, which women choose not to do. It's not a conspiracy to pay women less.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 01:52 PM
4

Some are more equal than others, the sow squealed.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 04:22 AM
2

They can't uphold the right to freedom of religion and ban circumcision: that's being caught between a rock and a hard place. However, they could uphold the right to religious belief as its supposed to be an individual thing anyway, just not able to express that belief on another person without their consent. Since children can't consent ...
/r/MensRights13/03/23 04:12 AM
6

Eve committed the original sin and got humans expelled from paradise: that shit trumps women being allegedly oppressed for hundreds of years. What were you saying dear about being complicit in the actions of your sex?
/r/MensRights13/03/23 03:48 AM
4

I don't understand why I have to explain this to people: surely its obvious to any rational person. The OP is not going to be able to help her son whilst she remains embedded in selfishness as she's only helping herself.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 01:55 AM
1

People depend on society to provide resources to live and raise children: if you don't have a contract to raise a child, you don't receive resources to do so and have to fund it all yourself. If you resort to crime to fund that child raising, you will be punished and the State will take care of the child.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 01:00 AM
2

In response to the topic, rights are fundamentally more about enshrining basic guidelines about what is "right": what is moral or ethical, at a societal level rather than a theological level. However enshrined rights can not cover everything in detail and its consequences, so we tend to simplify and say "anything goes except that which we define in law as prohibitions". Rights are further clarification to "anything goes" because people have a tendency to believe anything they do is right because…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 11:20 AM
6

Men in this sub are feeling people too, for some of them this will be a trigger over their own trauma: you have to allow them to feel their own feelings and not require them to "man up" and solve this womans problems for her, or gild the lily and deal with her sensitively as she's not the victim in this scenario but experiencing the consequences of a huge personal mistake and distorted belief system. Even now she's trying to defend her actions whilst wanting her son to be the little boy again: i…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 10:26 AM
5

The more things change the more they stay the same: this mass hysteria around accusing men of criminal activity reminds me of what I have heard about the Salem witch trials accusing people of witchcraft based on the merest suspicion or interpretation of unholy practices or behaviour. In this case, society idolises women and children so much, that the merest suspicion or fantasy of practices or behaviour against them is enough to trigger lynch mob behaviour: it's almost religious hysteria all ove…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 09:43 AM
1

It's all based on the biology of sexual reproduction for humans that requires both parents to contribute specific qualities, according to their roles, in a complementary fashion, for the best result. It doesn't preclude some overlap or exchanging of certain roles and it doesn't recognise the reality of diversity, so assigning particular qualities as rigidly masculine or feminine is pointless because it only holds true in a restricted sense and not in the current real world. Calling men less masc…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:56 AM
1

Women have historically been given the short end of this stick and not been given the same amount of rights as us This is what I disagree with because the short end of the stick is a matter of perspective and biology. Women have not been oppressed by men, but their biology, if you want to assign blame. It was reasonable for women to cleave to one man to leverage his interest in exclusive access to sex to avoid being pack raped by any opportunistic men, given their biology, as it was an improveme…
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:02 AM
1

Women may not want to give up that attention and power, but just like society legally requiring men to suppress their biological sex drive in the interest of womens comfort (eg no harassment), women should legally be required to suppress their biological drive for attention in the interests of mens comfort (eg no teasing) if feminists are serious about equality.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 12:10 AM
1

Abandoning assigning characteristics to masculine and feminine does not change men and women exhibiting these characteristics, but does free them from having to live up to a stereotypical assignment. For example, a job should not be advertising for men or women but for conformance with certain characteristics the job requires: masculine and feminine doesn't enter into it.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 12:04 AM
3

So, all men in Scotland boast about sexual conquests and crash the system: they'll think twice next time, after they have picked up the pieces.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:18 AM
6

I disagree: women have been protected throughout history from what could have been their biological fate of being raped by any opportunistic man, by aligning with just one man and his desires and relying on his protection of his exclusive access to what she brings to his life. It wasn't perfect because her biology made her vulnerable to the rigours and dangers of childbirth, but it afforded her protection from what otherwise might be, however it has improved markedly with the development of cont…
/r/MensRights11/03/23 02:12 AM
22

Men who kill their kids are publicly crucified as monsters whilst women are seen to have a mental health issues likely due to the impact of evil men.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 01:21 AM
20

Oh, they'll find a way to blame the husband: perhaps a neighbour once hearing he raised his voice coming forward and they will say she snapped under the domestic violence.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 01:18 AM
1

The issue though isn't about women asking to be raped by the way they dress, but inciting mens sexuality by the way they dress, requiring men to do something about it: essentially its teasing and its a cruel thing to do when you criminalise the men who then have difficulty suppressing or otherwise discharging their arousal, for acting on something you have deliberately incited when you had no intention of following through. I think its borderline entrapment. Take the example of women making them…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 08:37 PM
-1

The 2nd bullet point: having qualities traditionally ascribed to women, as sensitivity or gentleness (meaning feminine) is countered if masculine men exhibit sensitivity or gentleness, which apparently they do, so consequently the premise of masculine and feminine is incorrectly ascribed and is more to do with qualities required for specific roles or tasks.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 08:22 PM
1

I'm simply making a statement about being offended, in response to your comment about askfeminist being offended, not suggesting you are offended in this instance. However, you are responding as though offended by your own interpretation of what I said. Doesn't anyone consider comments might have more than one interpretation of being about them personally any more, or that comments might be responding to a previous comment rather than the person making the comment?
/r/MensRights10/03/23 01:16 PM
1

I'm not trying to say any more than I have said or implying anything more than I have stated.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 01:04 PM
1

Discrimination is basically personal choice: where it becomes unacceptable is in altering outcomes for certain groups in society based on characteristics outside their control leading to inequality through personal bias.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 12:58 PM
2

What women wear is definitely going to change the situation because we have sexualised the exposure of female flesh as the main way to indicate sexual availability. Prostitutes don't wear what they do because they think they look nice, it's a signal they are open for business. Any woman dressing like that will be interpreted as a signal of sexual availability because human beings have rejected actual communication for symbolic gestures that can be misinterpreted. So if women want to wear whateve…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 12:51 PM
1

Being offended is something you manufacture yourself that is your responsibility, not that of the source.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 12:29 PM
5

And the online world is perfect to ignore their flapping lips, if it wasn't for simps irrationally censoring freedom of expression in the hopes of getting a bone from women. It's so sad though that only a tiny corner of Reddit is the potentially last remaining place for male expression.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 12:23 PM
1

Are Fathers usually insensitive and rough to their newborns? I believe we should stop thinking in terms of masculine and feminine as both sexes can exhibit traditional behavioral characteristics of each other in particular settings (roles): it's more about the qualities necessary to optimally function for each setting and outcome desired, which just happens to correlate with biologically related characteristics more often than not. Society will not continue to exist without all the qualities exp…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 12:20 PM
8

Trust your instincts: if you felt uncomfortable enough to setup a boundary, there's likely a kernel of truth to that concern. Are you sensing she is looking for more than the relationship and this is a convenient excuse to put herself in a situation where something is likely to happen that she can blame on circumstance, when it is an engineered circumstance of likelihood? Have you ever discussed your feelings and consequences with each other about cheating and what that might constitute? Rather …
/r/MensRights10/03/23 01:19 AM
3

Encouraging selfishness instead of society (including self) through entrenching greed and avarice through capitalism, or power and corruption through communism elite, certainly doesn't help, but I believe in the reason of men to ultimately shine beyond self interest (united we stand, divided we fall; do unto others as you would have others do unto you), along with perhaps a touch of biological protectiveness embedded in our DNA.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 10:53 AM
1

They wouldn't need to do that as you would just have a woman sitting on the road surrounded by a few auxilliary parts: you could work it out through inference. But it wouldn't be a car she could drive, just spare parts. Women's Ford Explorer: when you just want to stay home and watch soap operas (because you don't actually have a functional car to go exploring or doing anything else).
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:15 AM
6

Then when the shit inevitably hits the fan when these inadequate officers face a challenge they can't handle and the police service collapses, its the men who have to stand up and save the day and the public who have to pay the price: the women will just cry and play the victim card that it wasn't their fault they were promoted above their ability, despite accepting the position for the benefits and not the responsibility.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 03:04 AM
1

There is this small conundrum that women only want to be approached by men they find attractive, so they don't have to waste time rejecting the ones they don't find attractive, however men can't know in advance of approaching whether a particular woman finds them attractive, so there are inevitably many mismatches: it manifests as anger at men for women not getting what they want. It would be so much easier, efficient and more honest if women did the approaching, since they are the ones making t…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 02:27 PM
10

Men are just sperm donors, dildos and ATMs to many women.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 06:15 AM
11

Or the multiple orgasms: women aren't owed sex.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 06:09 AM
5

The wrongdoing part is the threat: threat is coercion and when you link coercion with sex you get rape according to women. Do or do not, never threaten to achieve an outcome.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 06:05 AM
1

The future can be shaped, it doesn't have to result in the dystopia that's being imagined into reality, but we have to understand how things work before we can influence them into a reasoned different direction. Women operate off primitive emotional knee-jerk responses and can not be entrusted to shape a reasoned future on their own. They can't even see how 80% of women selectively pursuing 20% of men is going to end up with men and women having no long term relationship and that frustration imp…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 01:28 AM
2

I think thats a far too simplistic and black and white take: women do care about sex for pleasure, but it has far greater consequences and importance for them biologically than for men in other ways, so they have to be more selective. Despite the development of contraceptives and safe terminations, women have to battle millennia of experience in unwanted pregnancy impacting their very lives. I think women have been oppressed, but oppressed by their own biology, however, it's a difficult thing to…
/r/MensRights08/03/23 01:15 AM
1

Do women actually want that comment to be true, versus using it to villify someone for a characteristic they can't change? Same with the "all men are rapists" comment: would women really want that to be true in the traditional sense of brutal penetration against her individual wishes?
/r/MensRights07/03/23 07:25 AM
3

Men are designed to spread their seed widely, hence the male sex drive, but only Chads get the chance, so only Chads are the ones doing that: the rest of the men have to convert "widely" to "often" because of the constraints of society, hence a relationship simply being a way to minimise the effort to achieve "often" sex; it's still fundamentally satisfying the biological male sex drive. Men are not having relationships to procreate, but to have sex: procreation is a secondary effect and not a p…
/r/MensRights07/03/23 07:13 AM
1

It's quite sad that many men see no life beyond work and a family as though that is all that exists in a universe of interests and possibilities. Sure it was a conflation of what most men would like in one convenient package that is consistent with what society also encourages for its own benefit, but we have to break what we want out of life down into its fundamental components and then see if we can achieve those components more easily another legal way. Remember that anything you want that re…
/r/MensRights06/03/23 01:10 PM
3

I disagree with the premise: masculinity is an evolution of sexual reproduction and the roles needed to efficiently support the biology. Masculinity only seems to benefit women when you remove the ability to enforce an equal trade of roles that maintains the balance of power. Cancelling conjugal rights without also cancelling responsibility was the key nail in the coffin of masculinity, which allowed women to have absolute power as the gatekeepers of sex and the power to subsequently demonise me…
/r/MensRights06/03/23 12:31 PM
46

If they want to advertise a tendency to gossip instead of getting on with the actual work they are being paid to do, then fine. What's up with the logo of a smear of paint dripping down a cleavage?
/r/MensRights05/03/23 04:28 AM
9

So, a couple of children are exposed to something they feel uncomfortable about and the only possible response is to criminalise all men? That's like a woman slapping a man and consequentially, all women should be put in Hannibal Lecter restraints: it's not reasonable, but then women have always struggled to moderate their first primitive emotional impulse, with reason.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 04:21 AM
4

More lies, damn lies and statistics: it's possible to distort statistics by the question being asked and the definition used. If we used the old fashioned "he raped me with his eyes" as an example of the definition of rape, almost 100% of women could claim to have been raped in their lifetime but it would be objectively meaningless.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 01:17 AM
2

Considering the difficulty many people have getting a job, being fired for alleged inappropriate behaviour is a massive punishment without any of the due process and protection of the justice system. If a wrongdoing is that bad, it should be a criminal offense, afforded all the due process of the law for justice for both accused and accuser. In my opinion, all wrongdoing should be handled by the justice system, not by a kangaroo shadow court of business/public/media judgement based on guilty unt…
/r/MensRights03/03/23 06:12 AM
1

It's because they maintain the rights of the child to live in the style they have become accustomed to, are paramount, regardless of the state of the relationship of the parents and that women still represent the best biological option for raising children (because of potential pedophilia, domestic violence, etc) plus #believewomen and #womenneedprotection. It's because they conflate the separate elements of custody, financial aspects and parental involvement in a childs life into a single unrea…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 12:05 AM
36

It's not only long term sex, but even dating often requires the man to pay as an expectation, even though both are supposedly benefiting. However, the origin of provide and protect is biology: it makes sense for sexual reproduction to differentiate roles so that the more vulnerable of the pair (that way to better relate to an infant that they nurture) is provided for and protected from ravaging by other males, but at the expense of more sex (which they also find pleasurable) than they might want…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 11:45 PM
3

The critical aspect is what happens if you choose not to do what is asked, or don't you feel you have a choice in the matter, versus coming up with an excuse why you should always comply? Wives traditionally used to do 90% of the domestic chores because it was the man's role to provide the resources to support the family and she still had to pay her way somehow. These days with more women working and providing resources, the domestic chores need to be more evenly distributed, however its importa…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 02:34 AM
2

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Giving women absolute power through access to sex is bound to have consequences in corruption of that power, but we can't reasonably forcibly discard that power, or reason with women to voluntarily moderate their power when they are mainly driven by primitive emotion; the only reasonable thing men can do to counter it is to find alternatives that break that monopoly power that holds them hostage. This is not easy because society has entrench…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 02:16 AM
10

It can be related back to consent: a man needs to seek the consent of his partner for sex because it honours their right to choice in the matter, but equally in reverse, a partner wanting a man to do something also needs to honour their right to choice. If a woman then points out that a man not doing what is asked has consequences, it gives an opportunity to highlight that choice never comes without consequence, including when a woman chooses not to have sex: the ramifications of choice extend f…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 02:04 AM
11

The other balance is a result of not wanting to paint the world as it truly is, in an attempt to protect a child's innocence, but it tends to reinforce a fantasy view of how things should be. Which is worse needs to become a topic of discussion in society because I feel it is starting to have a detrimental impact and it continues to foster primitive emotional response in a changed environment, instead of practiced reasoned moderation of emotional responses. Consider the ridiculous situation of h…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:49 AM
3

Men are held hostage to "happy wife, happy life" and there is really no way around it because a womans life reflects her feelings and is impacted directly by them. There was less of a hostage situation when men could leverage reason through conjugal rights, but since they were annulled men no longer have any genuine leverage. If you can't stand the heat, don't enter the kitchen is the only practical alternative. Unfortunately men are conditioned not to explore any other realistic alternatives th…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:36 AM
2

Lost a lot of weight despite eating excessively struck me as more a medical disorder of immediate concern, especially if you suffered from appendicitis: the body could be diverting a lot of energy to deal with an infection or something else and accumulating toxins could also affect your mental activity. Get yourself checked out medically based on the weight loss and appendicitis first.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:08 AM
1

No, its not my responsibility to manage your interpretations or your offense at whatever is said.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 10:57 AM
1

Wow, its interesting you interpreted all that from what I did say.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 10:41 AM
1

Boys don't want relationships and families though: that may come over time as they mature. For them, sex is everything. It's understandable from a biological perspective as nature wants procreation to continue the species and doesn't care if some get hurt along the way, but humans can do better. I consider it abusive to release sex hungry inexperienced boys onto inexperienced girls as its bound to traumatise some and lead to the view of sex as unpleasant experience for many. Surely modern civili…
/r/MensRights27/02/23 10:13 AM
6

Double standards and hypocrisy are not remotely close to equality, yet equality is what feminism is supposed to be based on. When is feminism going to start hauling women into line with feminist principles? If they don't then feminist principles are a fraud perpetrated on society.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:05 AM
6

Rape allegations should be a criminal matter including mandatory police attendance and the full weight of the justice system, including contempt of court for false allegations or wasting the courts time, not white knights taking the law into their own hands. The justice system is also becoming complicit in revenge rape accusations, by its own process facilitating punishing people before trial who may actually be not guilty.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 05:59 AM
1

Boys and men aren't sexually rapacious, they are expressing their natural innate biology. I agree that can be a problem when society expects inexperienced boys to find out about sexuality and relationships by trial and error, whilst girls are given fantasy notions that boys want relationships and families (they don't, they want sex). It's the fault of society for not facilitating a boys education in a way that satisfies their sexual needs and also educates them in how to negotiate relationships …
/r/MensRights27/02/23 05:20 AM
1

I think giving women enough rope to hang themselves with is the way to do it: overt action is just more of the patriarchy in action, so passive resistance is the way to go. How about asserting your own consent as a man, such as choosing not to take the garbage out just when her majesty demands? But be aware of the consequences of doing that in triggering use of access to sex to gain compliance, although it might be interesting to point out how she can choose to not consent to things she doesn't …
/r/MensRights27/02/23 05:03 AM
2

Jerking off isn't the only option for male sexual enjoyment, but its the only one most men have explored. Why should you be ashamed about jerking off, when it is women's rejection of men that leaves men with less options? They are the ones who should be ashamed over having such high selection criteria, which are not only impacting men but their own feminist sisters ability to have a relationship. 80% of women chasing 20% of men logically does not have a good outcome for society.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 04:50 AM
4

Even that strict biological range is predicated largely on biologically inherited advantage, so not a level playing field. If you could guarantee it was only because of training and effort, then competition makes more sense, but competing on biological talent is discriminatory in my opinion. It's similar to paying people more for a biological talent that they don't even need to work at to be productive, whilst the rest of us labour back breakingly in many cases yet receive little remuneration be…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 01:19 PM
6

Competition is already predicated on biological advantage, so it's never been a level playing field and I have never understood holding someone up to idolatry based on an inherent talent that the rest of us weren't born with. Personally I would abandon competitive sport in favour of the development of cooperative endeavour. In my opinion, transwomen aren't women and never will be: they are transwomen and in their own diverse category. Same for transmen. I would be in favour of separate transwome…
/r/MensRights24/02/23 05:26 AM
0

I hope all that doesn't occur during dating. Men will never get a choice when it ultimately is her body her choice (and her responsibility hence the greater importance of dating to find the right man to have a child with), however if men can get sperm accepted in the same category of other bodily tissues, then it may be possible for the man to have sole choice over the use of his tissues. Dating for men is largely about sex: I doubt he's thinking at that stage of having a child with that woman, …
/r/MensRights23/02/23 07:10 AM
-8

It's more a womens issue since it has more biological consequences for her.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:20 AM
3

As thinking intelligent beings, we don't have to accept "that's just the way things work". We have already modified biology with contraception and termination, now we have to tackle the more philosophical elements such as women having a right to choose over sex, but not a right to no consequences from their choice; and men having a right to biological sexual expression but not to override womens choice. Achieving a win-win solution to that conundrum has not yet been attempted, only a unilateral …
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:19 AM
1

You do realise that nature having to drug men and women to successfully procreate in the face of sex being already pleasurable for both, suggests procreation is an overall negative experience but is essential to perpetuate a species. The animals don't know any better, but humans have awareness, so we should understand that this is how it is, but we glorify procreation and turn it into a fantasy of positive expectations when it is on balance the opposite. I believe it is these false expectations …
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:04 AM
2

Incipient civil war looming.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:07 PM
7

What is the likelihood women will force men to change the definition of violence to include avoiding women? I don't know how it is defined at the moment: could be harsh language is now defined as violence.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 02:06 PM
1

Ever heard of "concern trolls"? How can she support men by pretending we are all handsome and hardworking and ignoring the male reality? It just propagates the fantasy. I appreciate some women want to help, but first they have to take their blinkers off. Calling me out over trying to highlight reality and turning it into a woman victim situation in a mens rights sub is not on.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 01:02 AM
1

Women are only traditionally the focus of mens lives, starting with sexual reproduction: they aren't the only possible way for men to achieve fundamental things in life. Personally I think trying to build yourself up into what women want is a waste of time because you are chasing shifting sands, not to mention some of the things they want aren't very practical to change and even if you do snag a woman on some desirable aspect, they will likely find something else they consider you are deficient …
/r/MensRights21/02/23 10:23 AM
1

Justice is not based on subjectivity but objectivity: things that can be proven to exist. It's tragic how that is now being reversed as it will end in chaos and collapse of the judicial system resulting in a worse outcome for women.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 09:35 AM
3

But you see, women don't want to be bothered with sex at all when they don't want it, not even a single approach, yet they can't reason a man cannot know a woman's mind in advance. It's almost like they believe men are an extension of themselves who already know their mind.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 09:25 AM
1

Would the UK survive a mass DV conviction that overwhelmed the resources of the justice system to process it? Have harsh words with the missus and crash the system.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 09:16 AM
3

Profiling in other words: really worked out well for the USA when they used it against african americans, caused riots and civil unrest. It should do the same in the UK to get them to think about consequences of actions.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 09:12 AM
3

Sounds like a replacement of civilised justice with the Salem Witch Trials. Men will be screwed now in all kinds of ways without justice. I wonder how practical it would be for men to withhold their labour, including walking out of education to withhold future labour, en-masse, as an expression of solidarity in changing the current system: a future of justice or no future at all. Denial of education is a severe punishment for the life of a person in a modern world, but it also deprives society, …
/r/MensRights21/02/23 08:41 AM
5

Aren't there unfair dismissal laws in your location, or at least due process that must be followed in these situations to ensure justice? Depriving a person of a job is a significant punishment, up there with criminal penalties, to base it on allegation only and not providing an opportunity to defend or the other protections available under law. I believe many nations have been backsliding away from civilised progress and the pursuit of justice to create shadow systems of justice designed to inv…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 08:38 AM
9

Not only define, but verify that person was indeed a woman by definition. Not sure how that can even be done non-invasively and not violating other rights. Finally reason is starting to prevail, which is not unlike the human process of reacting on primitive impulse first (its deliberately faster than reason to instinctively protect against danger) and then reason starting to moderate the response. Even women who operate more on emotional impulse than men, often sheepishly come back eventually an…
/r/MensRights21/02/23 07:53 AM
-4

But we aren't all naturally handsome and hard working or otherwise appealing to women because of selectivity and despite feminism complaining how oppressed women are, this is part of the reality for many men and the cross they have to bear. No matter how unattractive women may think they are, men will appreciate them for other qualities and select them, if they were given the chance, however its women who ultimately choose and consequently reject men, contributing to their own loneliness and tha…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 09:45 AM
2

Women have the ultimate get out of war card: I'm pregnant (or choose to believe I am until I can make it happen).
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:58 AM
1

Men will absolutely be primarily expected to fight in the next World War: whether they agree to do so is another matter if the Ukraine experience was anything to go by. Countries would likely have to force their men at which point there is a good chance they might just turn on their dictators and choose to die fighting the system that led to this outrage than die fighting other men they don't have a grudge against and perpetuating the futility.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:13 AM
-5

Oh, the irony of rejecting radical feminism and male hatred to support men, but only the handsome and hardworking ones: can hate the others and not select them according to radical feminism. Either you forgot the sarcasm qualifier or you need to improve your English skills.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 06:07 AM
1

It is part of my role to ... help them follow all our procedures, guidelines, rules and policies. I doubt your role is to confront any staff who transgress policy as you have not been given the authority to punish or otherwise rectify the specific policy transgression: your role is more that of educator. So, hold a briefing of all staff where you re-iterate company policy with respect to uniforms and outline company repercussions for ignoring policy. You aren't making this personal. If you do ha…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 06:28 AM
1

Women not having absolute choice in sex is regarded as an unhealthy relationship for her, even though it gives her the power to choose to weaponise that choice in controlling her partner, which is not a healthy relationship for a man.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 02:46 AM
1

By what right does anyone deserve to be paid a salary for doing nothing, whether that is through laziness or a disability of some sort? I think everyone in society deserves a right to a basic livable income regardless of their circumstances, plus additional non-financial assistance (to prevent abuse) to achieve a reasonable quality of life if they have a disability: this does not include being paid what is effectively significant compensation for having a natural biological health issue. It's ev…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:21 PM
2

Whenever men and women are brought together there is tension because of the overriding issue of biology and the pursuit of sex (procreation) with its attendant unreasonable emotional outbursts. Work from home has so many synergistic benefits, including reducing workplace sexual tension, but it tends to highlight the inherent friction in relationships through men and women spending more time together. Current society is very good at minimising male-female time spent together through external work…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 12:04 AM
22

Workplaces are not dating sites and business is run for profit, not as a charity for womens particular biology (eg menstrual leave).
/r/MensRights16/02/23 02:07 PM
1

I think loneliness harks back to the consequences of being shunned from society in the past, which was life threatening. Whilst I would like to say that society no longer shuns people in a life threatening way, that would not be correct, however in general, being alone is not life threatening in the modern world with our access to telepresence. At a bare minimum, Reddit provides a connection to a huge number of people, that means participants are not completely alone. It's also possible to exten…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 01:17 PM
1

Like any education process, garbage in, garbage out. AI is interesting from the perspective of what outcome you get with minimal rules and refining rules down into a minimal set of ethical guiding principles.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:30 PM
3

Whilst it is a sad situation, it's also a fantasy that there is a happily ever after future for men, because no matter what you want, any outcome also depends on what another person wants: if you are lucky and your wants mostly overlap, then great, but just getting to that point of recognition of overlap is conditional on another person and beyond that point just doesn't happen that often or for long or in complete bliss. What we see in other couples is often only a display and not necessarily w…
/r/MensRights16/02/23 05:22 AM
0

What is correct behaviour according to their own biased notions. Genuine AI would detect that not making a joke to humiliate people would mean no jokes about any group of people within the whole class. Intelligence isn't suggested by an ability to divide groups as that ultimately leads to complete fragmentation.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 12:48 AM
3

Toxic compared to what: having to find her own food and shelter whilst fending off wild beasts and every opportunistic man who crosses her path? Choosing a mate to protect her, give her resources and allow her to fulfill her biological destiny of procreation in exchange for some home duties and perhaps more sex than she wanted at the time (even though it might be pleasurable) with no other responsibilities and doing what her body was designed to do was a far better solution than going it alone. …
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:50 AM
4

As if any apology will undo the impact of the event on all those boys involved: they all deserve therapy at school expense to try to reverse the damage that has been done.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 08:04 AM
85

ChatGPT is not AI, it's just a collection of rules, some of which conflict but its not intelligent enough to realise that. Basically, garbage in, garbage out like any other dumb computer. However, it is disturbing that its creators obviously have a bias against men which they have built into the rules, else why would it say it respects men and women and then refuse to make a joke about women but then proceeds to make one about men instead. ChatGPT had never risen above its creator biases to fall…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 07:55 AM
2

Winning is not everything and win-lose is not civilisation but sliding backwards to primitive survival. Women are not going to stop because they aren't reasoning the consequences of their actions: they have a taste of blood and they want more. I think of it like giving women enough rope to hang themselves with and that is what they will do by going too far and precipitating collapse of the society they seem to so desperately want to advantage them, but will inevitably disadvantage them in the lo…
/r/MensRights15/02/23 07:44 AM
20

Live your best life for you, not women, and let the cards of society fall where they may, it will eventually sort itself out as women are cutting off their nose to spite their face. However that requires working out and exploring fundamentally what you want in life, not living the traditional narrative that women are the only option and deserve a free ride. Talk back within forums like these and avoid getting involved in womens spaces. Live and let die.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 12:14 PM
1

Your do you and let other men do them.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 02:00 AM
1

Reproduction is natures desired end result, but the method is through sexual pleasure and the sex drive in men. Yet despite the pleasurable aspect and the drive, nature still has to drug men and women to get them to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful. Human focus is not primarily on the end result of procreation, at least for most men, but on sex: procreation is a useful side effect. A young man first starting his sexual exploration is not looking to have a child, that's …
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:39 AM
1

I never said it was going to be easy, but perhaps easier than getting suicidally depressed over rejection by women and thinking your life is over. It can begin with watching bisexual porn and identifying with the men involved, imagining what they are feeling with their senses as you might feel with yours. Sexual enjoyment after all is mainly about sensations in your body and women aren't the only sources of stimulation of those senses. Gradually you might start to question why women are the only…
/r/MensRights14/02/23 01:22 AM
1

Yet despite the disadvantages, sex still prevailed in the past beyond that required for procreation. You ignore the strength of the male sex drive too, which nature uses to ensure sex and thus procreation happens. Whilst procreation is the objective of nature to ensure continuation of the species, it is arrived at through sex and the sex drive, not a procreation drive. Certainly men don't have sex hoping each event results in a pregnancy.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 10:52 PM
1

Over the reproductive lifetime of an individual though, sex for procreation is a small component of sex for pleasure and remember even sex for procreation is pleasurable, so it further bolsters the sex for pleasure side when it is engaged in for everything: pleasure and procreation. Sex exclusively for procreation, in the western world at least, is virtually negligible.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 10:42 AM
2

You don't need a relationship with a woman to experience unconditional love, in fact you might find that quite difficult as womens love, just like access to sex, comes with conditions attached: a dog can provide unconditional love (not sex) if you are prepared to look after it properly. In a similar way, you can likely find fundamental aspects of life that can be pursued independently that don't necessarily require the involvement of a woman and be easier to accomplish. You don't have to be alon…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:54 AM
1

There are many men in society who have sex with men (possibly with a female partner too) but do not identify as gay/homosexual or bisexual: they just enjoy sex with men as recreation and not emotional entanglement. You don't have to be homosexual to explore sex with men, although challenging your allegedly fixed "sexual orientation" may be interesting: sexual enjoyment can also take many forms and doesn't have to be the totality of gay experience either. In a time of women rejecting men for sex …
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:36 AM
2

What if women didn't find you attractive: would you live the rest of your life as a celibate or would you dare to explore the realm of sex with men and see if your sexual orientation stood the test of your sex drive and sexual expression? Should men deny themselves the possibility of recreational sexual fulfilment because their sexual orientation is an absolute they can't cross? You're not necessarily going to become romantically entangled with another man, it could simply be sexual enjoyment in…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:33 AM
2

It's not simply woman->man, if it's a cis-woman then its gay man and all the expectations of that sub-culture.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 08:08 AM
2

Why would I want to when I agree? Just to clarify, "happy wife, happy life" means a man's happiness is held hostage to his wife's happiness over which he has little control: it only takes an external event to upset her, completely unrelated to her man and his access to sex is revoked, basically punishing him for her emotions.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 07:17 AM
1

Yet despite those historical disadvantages, sex was rife enough to have prostitutes and femme fatales, children born out of wedlock and backyard abortions where the intent was obviously not to procreate. Don't underestimate the power of the male sex drive: a short life but an effing pleasurable one.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:54 AM
1

Thanks for that more detailed explanation than simply 14 attempts, however it doesn't change the fact that most couples can have 2.4 children in 3 years if they wish and are fortunate: it then leaves the rest of their lives to have sex but not have children, plus they are likely having sex during pregnancy. I stand by my original argument that sex is only used for procreation in the barest minimum of circumstances in modern society. Despite the disadvantages, sex without the intention of childre…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 06:50 AM
25

It's not chivalry: despite decades of feminism and alleged equality, it's still basically "happy wife, happy life" and fundamentally attempting to bribe more sex. It's why simps still exist, in the hope their good deeds will be rewarded.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:50 AM
1

That's only a week of sex for a motivated couple, for a procreation that lives for over 75 years and only 2.4 weeks over a lifetime to maintain human population replacement. I still maintain procreation is the barest minimum of sexual activity.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:40 AM
3

The barest minimum amount of sex is involved in procreation, or didn't you know about contraception and termination to enable that to be the case? Human beings use sex largely for recreational pleasure. Sexual pleasure and the male sex drive exists as an inducement to have sex which correspondingly can lead to procreation and the whole reason of maintaining sexual reproduction to maintain a species existence.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:20 AM
2

Are you sure about that? We don't understand the nature of the subconscious or how traumatic memories are stored or used. Given that we take notice of traumatic events far more than pleasurable events, so we can avoid them in future, suggests all trauma is remembered in some way and acted upon to protect the individual. We talk about "muscle memory" and even the heart and other organs appear to have elements capable of memory. I think it is even within the realms of possibility that circumcision…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 03:29 AM
3

And also different interpretations are able to be expressed, not one giant echo chamber of a single perspective. However I still haven't been able to work out how the poster manages to get an interpretation of "this person prefers child rape over circumcision" from the image: it seems more like a projection of their own issues.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 03:20 AM
26

Both because neither are uncoerced choices and invade our implicit rights. This is why all of humanity requires an enshrined right to bodily sovereignty, including use of tissues: it covers so many areas that currently require complex legislation that has so many loopholes. In that anecdote, I should imagine at least one of them is having sex, just not with the other. It's time for sex to be notionally separated from procreation, so that procreation can focus on its objective and sex on its obje…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:54 AM
5

It's why it's possible for women to goad men into an emotional state that gets expressed naturally as testosterone mediated physical response and then the woman has him on orchestrated domestic violence and is "rescued" by other men, also taking over his resources to support the "victim": apparently violence trumps abuse and entrapment.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 02:47 AM
4

If something can be interpreted in a number of ways, you don't have the right to choose the most offensive just so you can be offended and attack the other party for your taking offense. What happened to benefit of the doubt and clarification of meaning? The word "female" is reviled because it suggests animalistic behaviour and women prefer to to see themselves as above such things.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:34 AM
1

It's extremist thinking and its generally not true: Parents may have messed you up in the past, but your future as an adult is in your hands. Your ex didn't destroy your entire life: you are still alive with the remainder of your life to improve it. You haven't approached everybody to be able to say nobody likes you and liking is a 2-way street, so its harder to manage than something involving only one person. We often like things we have in common, so start engaging with others with common inte…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:30 AM
5

Children are very vulnerable to manipulation by the power dynamic between parent and child, so that its the parents wants that are implemented rather than the childs. It means a Mother's hatred of men can be taken out on the child, or her preference for a daughter or any other parental whim or emotional issue is given priority. Part of assessment of trans potential must include removal of the child from parental influence long enough to establish whether it originates from within the child or wi…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:57 AM
2

It's not breasts that are the objective, so they are somewhat incidental. In any case, the attraction of breasts is as an indicator of ability to nurse children, so as long as they are functional, size doesn't matter except for bragging rights. Even if they are not functional, man has sufficient reason and awareness to have functional alternatives, so nursing ability itself is not a deal killer.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:14 AM
8

Emotion trumps reason, so when the objective is reason, try not to trigger emotion: very difficult with women who operate almost exclusively on emotion as you have to wait for the emotion to subside to get through to them with reason and they are fighting you all the way with triggered offense after triggered offense, almost like they are addicted to the chemical rush associated with strong emotions.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:07 AM
-5

It's not weakness, it's about having the strength to suck it up for the benefit of the society and carry that burden yourself, so they don't have to: a protective and self-sacrificing gesture along with all the other similar gestures that men make in service of the tribe. Men are not disposable, they absorb the worst in sacrifice to protect others. They only ask for sex and family stability in return, yet that seems too much despite those also being pleasurable pursuits for women. Choice is not …
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:59 PM
1

It's not your job to do more but for society to recognise the issues involved and not just let them slide and then punish people retrospectively as a deterrent to others, which also doesn't work in emotional situations. I like the suggestion by someone else that you should make your rejection of romantic entanglement, but not work colleague participation, a matter of policy and not about the qualities of the individual involved.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 01:11 PM
0

Men feel rejected because that is what women are doing through selective choice: it's quite simple really, but why this is happening is likely complex with many factors.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 04:15 AM
1

Pointing out statistics is not making an argument for something in the same way as saying "1 in 4 homeless are women" is simply stating a statistic (which may or may not actually be factual) and ignores the remaining 3 out of 4 homeless which are presumably men. It's like women have an unspoken reason in their head why this is important, but if they don't share that reason, then the statement has no context or meaning and is just empty words.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 03:58 AM
3

Don't let it slide, tackle the issue immediately: deflecting comments during the initial stages just allowed him to think he had a chance. The longer he is left thinking its still a possibility the harder it will be to take the rejection. No need to be a jerk, just be straightforward that you have no interest in anything happening between the two of you at a romantic level, so his approaches are just wasted effort and becoming annoying and interfering with your mutual professional relationship. …
/r/MensRights11/02/23 03:25 AM
1

Was prescribed one tablet of Pregabalin that induced suicidal nightmares I had never experienced before: it's difficult to believe it is possible to want to kill yourself in a dream, when you would never consider that in life, yet it happened. I'm willing to believe it is possible for chemical imbalances to override what would be normal behaviour in other circumstances. However, such things need to be treated until such time as a person is no longer a threat to anyone else and prevented from bei…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:11 AM
2

Human beings are afraid of difference and fear generates a fight or flight response. Gay men are different from other men and this generates fear, especially with society deliberately entrenching homophobia for other reasons, but since they aren't allowed to kill you to eliminate the source of fear, belittling the source of their fear is considered the next best thing as it is still tolerated. It's a sad fact about civilisation that is slow to progress and reason its behaviour instead of making …
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:53 AM
1

Women are designed to be in tune with childrens needs, which I would think by necessity means they have to retain a child-like aspect they can connect with. Perhaps its inevitable because of biology, just as women tend to be more neurotic, emotional and paranoid than men because it has advantages in raising vulnerable children who have difficulty articulating their needs. Consequently, women are by design always partly children, so womanchild as indicator of an unusual response, is redundant.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:28 AM
2

How about "femchild" for ease of pronunciation?
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:20 AM
10

The only power men now have is to withhold their labour, since they aren't getting anything out of it when it is being used to fund women taking it all, and let the chips fall where they may.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 03:15 AM
-1

We aren't here to help you feel better about what happened to your relative or give you false hope: it's not about you.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 02:43 AM
1

Thats one interpretation of what the statement could mean, but without that statement being explicitly qualified to identify the interpretation implied, its a meaningless statistic. Statistics without context are meaningless, however I note that some women have an interpretation in mind, but expect men to also have the same interpretation without them saying it, as though men can read minds. There is a child development stage called "theory of mind" in which a child realises other people are not…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 01:35 AM
1

But you are not garbage if you are tossed aside: you have gained experience, had some good times and all at someone else's expense that you probably could never have achieved yourself and you can still go onto other things. You have only been replaced and whilst that may emotionally upset you, you haven't lost anything of significance but gained something of substance. Garbage has reached the end of its useful life to most everyone.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 07:08 AM
2

They can't afford to give up their addiction to offense and outrage because of the withdrawal symptoms.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 06:52 AM
34

1 in 4 Homeless People are Women I'm still waiting for the punchline that gives this statement of fact some kind of rational purpose in argument.
/r/MensRights08/02/23 06:20 AM
3

Is he competing by offering a woman a mans hairstyle only as that is all he does? Is the clause about not offering a woman a hair cut or not offering women's hair cuts? If he offers to give her a short back and sides and she refuses, that's not on him and he didn't compete or act in a discriminatory manner.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:01 PM
2

Perhaps the answer is casual mens groups that are not organisations that women can demand to be included in. Women surely can't demand to be part of any grouping of men.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:17 AM
21

The barber should have offered her a short back and sides so she didn't feel discriminated against.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 06:10 AM
2

But your comments are open to critique and response like everyone else.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 11:15 PM
2

Sex is potential sexual assault, but the law doesn't deal with potential, just facts and likelihoods beyond reasonable doubt. Sex assaults female sexual tissues, yet is not necessarily sexual assault. If there are other explanations of the circumstance that can't be ruled out, then that is automatically grounds for reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 02:06 PM
1

Circumstantial: nothing may have happened except she blacked out; she could have been giving him or about to give him a blow job and blacked out; etc. Plenty of possible scenarios of what might have happened , yet you choose the the most criminal as the only possibility. If the Jury found him not guilty, I'm inclined to believe them as they would have seen all the evidence.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 02:02 PM
1

Men have lost just about everything that had significance to them through women championing their own choices above everything else: that's a very deep hole to climb out of, however not impossible if we can identify opportunities to access fundamental elements of meaning to men. Women haven't yet eliminated a man's opportunity to experience unconditional love (not sex) and its companion of caring about a living creature other than yourself, through ownership of a dog. Most men have yet to explor…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 04:39 AM
1

Friendship is dependent on another person wanting to be friends with you: it's not enough for you to want to make friends. Relationships are a huge deal for women: I'm not convinced that is so true for men, however we can structure society that it becomes a big deal for men also if they don't have any other options of significance to them. I feel that mens spaces provided a significant avenue for them, for relationship of a sort, which has been destroyed by women wanting to invade those spaces f…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 03:17 AM
1

Family is only one avenue of support for an individual, that society puts far too much emphasis on: it leads to a kind of nepotism and a concentration of resources along family lines with an associated widening of divides between people. If you don't have family, you often have nothing and that is not the way to ensure wellbeing for everyone. Wellbeing has to be actively facilitated, not left to chance of someone selecting you to be part of a support network or leaving you out in the cold. Women…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 03:04 AM
-1

Human beings weren't designed to do only one thing: humans have awareness and reason which is beyond biology; we have already selectively severed the biological tie between sex and procreation. I don't see gay and bisexual men checking out because they will never have a woman to fulfil their reason for existence. Strange: I must not be a living thing because I have no desire to reproduce myself, in fact I determinedly resist the idea of propagating my genes to a new being for them to suffer.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 04:18 AM
-1

My suggestions are often radical. Firstly, you are talking about sexual orientation (aka sexual preference) and according to Kinsey it spans a spectrum from 100% heterosexual to 100% homosexual and every shade inbetween including bisexual: it's not either gay or straight and it's not an absolute as we can choose to ignore our own preference. I like to think of sexual orientation as similar to an emotional impulse which is automatic and has a default setting but can be adjusted through rational c…
/r/MensRights04/02/23 04:09 AM
1

Suspicion likely exists because of characteristics in a child a parent doesn't expect based on the genetics of the parents, however different characteristics can also arise through mutation, which is why it is 50%. However, paternity can still be different without showing significant indicators if the Mother's genetics predominate, and mutation can also work in favour of hiding other paternity characteristics too. Consequently in all other cases where there is no glaring indicator, it is not pos…
/r/MensRights04/02/23 02:23 AM
5

He's been continually pregnant since puberty.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 01:56 AM
2

This is the agenda of transferring resources from specific men (sperm donors) to business and then to wider society as a way to more easily compel resources for raising children women want and not having to bother about what men want. Specific men have too many options to avoid providing resources for what women want and they are too hard to pursue individually in quantity: much easier to pursue a limited number of companies or ultimately one society.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 01:55 AM
0

That's very sad they are unable to explore outside the box for the components that make up happiness and only want one thing that isn't likely to grant them happiness anyway. My neighbour has a brand new top of the line ride-on lawnmower that I can't hope to obtain but desire to have. Do I check out because I can't mow my lawn with what I want, when I can still mow my lawn with the mower I already have?
/r/MensRights04/02/23 01:42 AM
-1

I thought I was offering coping suggestions. I'm not telling men to be happy with this existence, I'm suggesting men explore finding what fundamentally results in happiness from other sources that may be more achievable. By your definition, men are not going to be human anyway, because women are rejecting them, so they become depressed and take their own lives or snap and cause societal damage. I'm trying to offer an alternative way to look at the situation: ways for men to still pursue fundamen…
/r/MensRights04/02/23 01:30 AM
1

Could be an error in ticking the wrong box from the DNA test: the discrepancy between the 2 documents should be contested as quickly as possible. Whilst not the same thing exactly, I had a medical test for driving license renewal and the doctor ticked the wrong box for results from the eye test and I was required to get glasses. I had to get a 2nd independent eye test done to provide sufficient evidence to contest the accuracy of the doctors assessment, uncover the mistake and get a reversal. Mi…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:51 PM
1

She became pregnant 2.5 months after separation, or only announced pregnancy 2.5 months after separation? It's conceivable she became pregnant just before separation but paternity is confused through cheating: you might have more information you haven't provided that clarifies the situation. It can be up to a month before a woman realises she may be pregnant and another month before failure of menstruation again confirms it, in the absense of actual testing for pregnancy. If a woman really wants…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:40 PM
0

It would be much more efficient for women to pursue the men they were attracted to and save all that wasted effort if they are only going to accept those men anyway. Then the remainder of us could pursue other things knowing we had no chance. Not being selected by a woman does not mean we are defective in some way, but that she is being selective according to her own subjective criteria that are not about us personally but about men generally. I'm curious about the propensity to select on height…
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:24 PM
-6

I don't agree men are screwed for life (in the worst sense): only if you pursue things that cannot be and keep bashing your head against a brick wall hoping for a different outcome. Stand back from that wall and walk around it to see what else exists in the world that might capture your interest.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:08 PM
1

I think it requires men to re-evaluate what they are fundamentally looking for in life and to choose avenues that are most conducive to satisfying those requirements, not in trying to find the perfect woman to match those requirements, but who also has her own selective process operating against you. Bisexual men have an advantage in doubling the effective pool of possibilities, but this still means they are dependent on another party being willing and compatible. So what are men looking for in …
/r/MensRights03/02/23 02:04 PM
1

They need the same human rights monitoring (as in a single rights monitor that doesn't see gender as a differentiator), not separate human rights monitoring for each gender, because a human right is not based in gender.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 11:37 AM
17

If the HRC is not supporting rights for men as they are for women, then the rights they have chosen to implement are not fundamental human rights but gender specific rights. Human rights can not be gender specific, although they may require additional support in areas that are gender specific to bring them into parity. Advantage for any gender is not parity in human rights, but addressing disadvantage can be.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 06:40 AM
1

It's not a rape culture: it's the inevitable mismatch between the biological drive for men to mate and the civilised view of right to choose over sex. The civilised view does not cancel the biological drive and society needs to consider ways to achieve a win-win outcome, not pursue the knee-jerk response of throwing the baby out with the bathwater in attempting to suppress the male sex drive for womens advantage only. These two elements need to coexist. Society has just been lazy in adopting a k…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 01:25 AM
2

A much simpler alternative is to give everyone a right to bodily sovereignty including tissues: this covers many areas including the right for a man to determine how his sperm is used. The default is that no-one can use your tissues without demonstrated consent: if they try there are severe penalties and they don't get the outcome they were seeking either. Having to frig around with physical barrier protection that is vulnerable to sabotage is not the way. Women have the right to control how the…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 12:26 AM
5

It's based on mate selection by women: she gets to sit back and choose the most appealing man, whilst the men compete for her affections. What they don't realise is that whilst they are off performing their feats, she's having fun with a bad boy who floats her boat and then gets the resources of the suitor. The winner doesn't actually get the girl, he gets access to whatever scraps of sex she deigns to provide whilst also using it to manipulate compliance with whatever she wants. The movies exag…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 12:02 AM
8

Stepping out of those roles but putting the cost onto men instead, so that women gain advantage, is not reasonable. Despite women arbitrarily choosing to step out of roles, biology is still intrinsically based on roles for which men and women are designed and that will never change until we change our biology. Transgender is not trans-biology and some gender roles are unlikely to become outdated.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:06 AM
1

Police aren't always on the scene to render immediate assistance when it is needed. A single person intervening is often a recipe for disaster, but a group restraining the situation until police can arrive has a chance of a better outcome: few people will continue to stand against a group as it is symbolic of society in general.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 11:53 PM
1

Especially with the labour saving gadgets we now have at our disposal that we pay for with extra labour now for future overall labour saving.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 11:42 PM
4

Wanting children requires a sacrifice: women don't get to have it all without a sacrifice being made by someone. Looking after yourself is not a sacrifice: looking after others requires a sacrifice because you are doing more than you need to for yourself. A person looking after a house that others share deserves remuneration for their efforts on behalf of others, or else all equally contribute. For the longest time, men have laboured to provide resources for a home and life support for themselve…
/r/MensRights29/01/23 11:41 PM
1

And vice versa.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 10:18 PM
1

A variation on the "if you are not for me you are against me" theme.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 01:12 PM
1

Men don't have a problem achieving orgasm generally, but if you mean helping a woman achieve orgasm will encourage her to make sex more frequent, could be a good thing for men who do not get enough. Men don't have to delay their own orgasms in order to help a woman achieve hers, because a woman's orgasm does not depend on a penis, it's only one of the devices that can be used to achieve the outcome. In fact many women don't orgasm through penile stimulation alone which means a man has to use mul…
/r/MensRights29/01/23 10:03 AM
4

Men don't owe women orgasms or anything else, but are open to requests, not expectations or demands.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 09:33 AM
3

Completely rational and also a case of women engaging in entrapment by drawing attention to themselves in order to "bust" a man.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 09:21 AM
20

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely: not gendered.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 09:09 AM
1

Why preference for height? It's not logical as height doesn't offer any particular survival advantages. Does it reflect a subconscious desire to be dominated whilst being able to turn it off in her mind when she doesn't want it (ie domination completely under her own control).
/r/MensRights27/01/23 12:37 PM
1

Women and others have legitimate biological reasons why they can't contribute as much to society, however, that does not give them the right to be compensated for work not performed. Everyone deserves a basic livable income in society and health care to deal with biological issues, but not to be paid for work they couldn't do because of said issues.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 12:05 PM
0

Just being mandatory for both is a step in the right direction for equality: if women are so against it afterwards, then its already been accepted that discrimination is unacceptable and so whatever women win, so too must men as the precedent has already been set. Doesn't matter if women get less dangerous positions because if they are opposed to mandatory service they will find a way around it anyway like getting pregnant which is not open to men. I think men have to accept that women will alwa…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:56 AM
3

They are not basic human rights if they are only applied to one half of the population.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:38 AM
5

Men don't owe women orgasms: be grateful men even care about whether women are having a good time and don't simply look after number one.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:04 AM
11

Why would anyone want to be a man: jumping through hoops to get sex; walking on eggshells over offending a womans feelings and being denied sex; being falsely accused or having a very low threshold of sexual assault applied when he accidentally brushed against her shoulder or glanced in her direction; not allowed to defend himself as that is considered assault on a woman; denigrated and villified for being born male and an intrinsic pedophile, rapist and violent person; denied reproductive choic…
/r/MensRights25/01/23 11:15 AM
1

Abuse is fundamentally about overriding choice with coercion. It may be that some boys gain valuable education in sexual relationships with older women and exploit their experience, but it has to be their informed choice to do so, on both sides, not an assumption that they should like it and that is enough. If we reversed the gender to girls, there would be outrage (and there is). I think it is equally abusive to not educate a boy about his body, potential, how it all integrates into society and…
/r/MensRights25/01/23 10:45 AM
12

Not simply divorce court but threatening a false assault or pedophile case in order to extort compliance to what a woman wants. It harks back to the domestic situation of a womans power over access to sex being used as coercive control to get what she wants from a man: when she can manipulate consent as weapon not as genuine choice over wanting sex, but to manipulate something else and override a mans ability to consent (ie consent through coercion is not consent). Now being extended to courts a…
/r/MensRights25/01/23 05:23 AM
15

There are already likely provisions for women to take leave due to period pain, cramps, etc just as there are already for pregnancy and childbirth. Perhaps the government didn't want all women having leave entitlements that men weren't receiving, not just the youngsters. In my opinion, this is not about leave for medical issues but paid leave for medical issues for women that men are not afforded, which effectively allows them to work less hours but get paid the same: closing the "pay gap" by st…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 05:40 PM
1

No, I believe they are more fundamental principles on which Marxism is based, however Communism is an implementation of Marxism that fails because it permits the formation of an elite hierarchy of advantage that becomes corrupt because of the power it wields. It's like making the concept of a State more important than the people who comprise it, with greater rights, which is the opposite of Marxism. Perhaps any implementation of a hierarchy will eventually fail through corruption unless the hier…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:22 PM
2

Patriarchy is just a trigger for association with trauma for some people. What is the gender split of people with worse reactions? I believe in diversity, where the fundamental biological patterns for male and female get distorted and cross over in some characteristics: imagine sexual orientation distortion of homosexuality, but applied randomly to all characteristics. I think it possible for men to have female brain characteristics that may make them more sensitive to female triggers and vice v…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 07:16 AM
0

I would suggest "child raiser" is the primary female skill set, along with parallel processing (resulting in better finger coordination) all designed to best deal with the demands of a non-verbal baby and often multiple children at different stages of development at the same time. It doesn't preclude simple gathering techniques in parallel that can be suspended to focus on the priority task and some plasticity means an overlap in roles. I think we also need to consider diversity where the fundam…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 03:12 AM
1

Ultimately I think it does mean equal pay for different jobs, when people are remunerated partly through happiness in expressing their talents in occupation they enjoy. If an outcome requires an activity to achieve it, then all such activities are equally valuable and should be paid the same. It's unreasonable someone should be paid more simply because of the game of chance giving them talents that doesn't require effort in achieving outcomes. That is, more talented people should not be automati…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:51 AM
6

Sadly, education does not necessarily result in the development of reason. Women operating more on emotional impulse than reasoning of consequences, without address is why we are in this situation. Men are being prevented from addressing the situation because it will hurt womens feelings. The reality is that many women are rapidly becoming not worth the effort, considering the risk of consequences that outweigh the benefits.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:37 AM
5

The world doesn't revolve around business, profit and economics, but around people. There are many possible circumstances where a man might feel he has no alternative but to quit a job: society needs to acquaint people with options designed to address sudden changes in circumstance that give flexibility to people, not constructs. Quit or not, business continues and is the least priority worthy element in this equation. The CS tether applied in majority to men, that can be easily abused by women,…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 02:30 AM
6

I think it is tragic to be so selective, no-one except an unreachable fantasy is good enough, especially if you are not a reachable fantasy yourself. Women lust after Brad Pitt without reasoning whether Brad Pitt would, or is even capable, of lusting after them. You can't have a real relationship or an actual child with a fantasy.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 08:24 AM
2

Women are going to select themselves into spinsterhood and the human race into extinction at this rate.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 06:31 AM
-1

An opportunity for all-women mud wrestling promotion?
/r/MensRights23/01/23 06:27 AM
13

Your bit includes educating your boy as to the realities and dangers in life for men.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 06:25 AM
36

Beating your head against a brick wall and expecting a different outcome is a sign of mental health issues.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 06:22 AM
6

Woman films her body: men most accused of objectifying womens bodies.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 06:12 AM
1

It's not simply about reproduction: nature tries to ensure a maximum permutation of genes in the hopes that a greater percentage will be beneficial to the species evolution and resistance to disease etc. If you rely on a limited genetic spread, you start to head towards the issues associated with inbreeding and sperm banks represent a limited genetic spread compared to present practice. It's biologically bad practice and unless you track every fertilisation and donor, you can get half siblings i…
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:35 PM
2

Where's the law that demands people have relationships with specific ages? We only have laws preventing underage relationships because of the inherent power dynamic. You would think by now women know of Leos preferences, so should be under no illusions or fantasy that it is going to be different for them as they are special.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:19 PM
2

Barely legal is an oxymoron: either they are of legal age or not, there is no bandwidth around it open to interpretation. You can't be "barely pregnant".
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:14 PM
1

Leo is a special case though as he has always looked younger than his years, so if you go off appearance, he is more compatible with younger women and chronological age should have no bearing.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 02:10 PM
2

As Bill Burr pointed out: no feminists in a house fire.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 01:17 PM
3

The retort to that is "thanks for making my point".
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:49 PM
1

They are desperate to fit in and belong to their adopted community, so they tend to go along with accepted practice without much question.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:26 PM
2

It's because children are granted more rights than adults and the rights of the child take priority, regardless of which adults get hurt in the process. It's blatant discrimination.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:23 PM
2

You can have a hierarchy that is non-oppressive when each person in the hierarchy is able to achieve personal happiness in expressing their own potential, even if they exist in a hierarchy based on other factors: happiness is fundamentally non-hierarchical when the lowliest function person can be as happy as a King by using their talents. We don't reward people with happiness and rewarding people with money is pointless because money does not buy happiness, it just perpetuates the hierarchy and …
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:13 PM
2

Government has an economic agenda to keep the population growing to maintain the wealth ponzi scheme for the elite, despite growth being unsustainable in a closed system. Of course they are going to deny young childless men control over their own bodies in order to force ongoing procreation just as they are forcing men into a future war through the draft by making it difficult for men to decline signing up: men are considered expendable but women protected to ensure the elite can repopulate the …
/r/MensRights18/01/23 01:01 AM
3

Developments with the vasalgel procedure, which is reversible, suggests men will likely soon have a better alternative to vasectomy. Whether governments allow young men to access the procedure has yet to be determined, but as others have suggested, there will be pressure to deny men control over their fertility so that women still have options to bypass procreation consent. Men don't even have consent over procreation, which is the equivalent to women having consent over sex. It's still a world …
/r/MensRights17/01/23 01:28 PM
2

Why beat your head against a brick wall, expecting a different outcome from another brick wall? You can live a fulfilling life without having a relationship with a woman: it requires working out your fundamental needs and exploring the best legal ways to satisfy them. Expecting one person to meet all our needs is unrealistic. Revenge will not undo the trauma you have experienced, although pursuing justice may prevent the trauma from being experienced by other men in future.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 03:36 PM
4

Yeah, if you agree with whatever she says and don't enter dangerous landmine territory. The problem is you can't know for sure what might set off an emotional mine.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 03:37 AM
4

Your sole and limited experience is not necessarily representative of the rest of the world: you could be a chad and thus not subject to the selectivity of women that other men experience. The new King Charles has no idea of the experiences of the common man or woman for example, because he has not had to experience them. Each of us lives largely in an ivory tower: I have no idea what it is like to live as a chad for instance.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 03:36 AM
-2

Custody is about who is best able to support the children: it shouldn't relate to involvement in the childs life which should be equal in the best interests of the child and independent of custody.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 03:27 AM
10

Even mediation of 50/50 means the potential for a man to have contributed more than a woman to the relationship, yet he still has to give her resources that he earned and she didn't. Men are expected to keep women happy, but not vice versa: it takes sacrifice to do that which is not recognised, such as all the unpaid effort in making a home the way a woman wants. I think relationships need to be on a mercenary footing for both: all effort priced at market rates with no discount for DIY.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 03:23 AM
0

Which the hourly rate is far more than it costs in a domestic situation, if you can convince a partner to provide as much sex as you need. When viewed from a position of need, all effort needs to be costed as if it was provided by a specialist service, but sex at home is not included because it is supposed to be mutual. Therefore his additional need for sex is costed at the prevailing prostitute rate, whilst her need for a home improvement is costed at tradesman and materials rates (and not mate…
/r/MensRights12/01/23 02:53 PM
0

It's time to cost all the work you do as if it was done by a professional service and then hand the wife half of the bill since she receives half the benefit of those services. The wife needs to do the same for the housework she does at the same rate. Then see on balance who should be paying whom. DIY reduces your own costs, but why should someone else also benefit from you selling your labour at reduced rates? Does she? Your time should be as valuable to you as hers is at the office. It used to…
/r/MensRights12/01/23 02:47 PM
2

How long ago did he say he avoids female relationships because they are dangerous? Over 18 months ago he started a relationship with Natalie Viscuso and became very defensive about fan comments about his private life. Apparently she is helping him pursue his dream of developing a real-life warhammer movie, but I fear mixing business and pleasure with someone who can destroy his dreams if she is not treated as she feels she deserves, is a big risk.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:53 AM
2

And get a sexually transmitted infection screening to catch and treat anything before it gets nasty: you don't know who she might have been having sex with.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:22 AM
8

Don't get a new girlfriend until have learned more about the unequal power of women, else be falling into the same old traps: women will be women sooner or later. Nature drugs men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful, but perhaps the drug wears off sooner for some people than others and then they not only have to face someone different from what they believed, but life is no longer a bed of roses: maybe it never was but they were too drugged to see it. The sudd…
/r/MensRights05/01/23 08:52 AM
1

Women have always had a kind of overall equality of outcome: in the primitive past it was giving sex for resources and protection, instead of fending off every opportunistic male and having to find her own resources (versus men taking on the responsibility for protecting women and putting themselves at risk, but having ongoing ready access to sex); more recently it was having no responsibility for anything at the expense of doing what her husband wanted (versus the man taking on all responsibili…
/r/MensRights05/01/23 08:31 AM
2

Is it possible feminists were relying on men to rescue them from the hole they were digging and reign in their worst extremes, despite the narrative, but men have done very little except become shamed and just walk away? It sounds perverse, however women have an alien mental process compared to men. As a man I still can't conceptualise "it isn't about the nail". It is suggested to walk a mile in someone elses shoes, but i can't get past questioning why women would deliberately wear high heels in…
/r/MensRights05/01/23 07:44 AM
14

Just because assets are accrued during a marriage doesn't imply a spouse was responsible for those assets being generated and so deserves a share. Each partner in a marriage brings things to the marriage that should be valued: a partner should not be entitled to any of the value that the other partner brings, only their own contribution. If a partner looks after the house and children or brings in assets, that needs to be valued, not expecting a share of their partners assets they didn't contrib…
/r/MensRights05/01/23 04:32 AM
1

Yeah, can't have informed consent for men, gotta trick them out of their resources, but heaven forbid any man deny a woman informed consent over sex. It's not only marriage licenses, defacto relationships are treated like marriages in many countries and relationships can become automatically defacto after a defined period of cohabitation.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 03:33 PM
1

Human beings are social creatures: it's not surprising many like company, but I don't think we are hardwired for female company, it just happens that humans are part of sexual reproduction where the male remains with the female for extended periods and thus they also happen to be the person most convenient to do other things with. Whilst women often don't like it, men do go out with their mates and even psychologists suggest that a couple relationship must allow freedom to interact with other pe…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 03:05 PM
8

Everyone dies, some before their time. Has anyone considered it might actually be a mercy for those men compared to what they might have to live through otherwise? People often take drugs to temporarily anaesthetise themselves against misery in their life. If the misery is so strong, perhaps permanent relief is better for them than enduring it for years. Whose wellbeing are we really looking at when wailing about those men dying: theirs or ours? It's a tragedy they are forced into a miserable si…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 02:54 AM
12

You don't hate being a man, you hate how men are treated compared to women today. Would you really want to be constantly harassed for sex, even when you didn't want it, have period and other uterine pains, inconveniently bleed, find it difficult to reason, etc? The grass just looks greener on the other side: I believe nature always tries to achieve balance, not necessarily equality so there are swings and roundabouts for both men and women. If you want unconditional love, get a dog (you won't ge…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 02:24 AM
13

I thought any transition of a minor required rigorous psychological assessment before any treatment was introduced: his Mother has an incipient conflict of interest and should not only not be the arbiter in this situation but must be balanced by the boys Father in influence outside of independent assessment. Parents should not have the right to unilaterally dictate medical procedures on minors against current medical opinion. In any case, I understood current medical practice was to socially tra…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 01:59 AM
10

The OP did support his child, to the tune of $30k/year, even though I doubt it was enforceable from Russia or environs, and he didn't receive any benefit himself. Now that his child is technically an adult, the responsibility of support ends. Whilst he should be able to have contact with his daughter if they both wish it, that's not the same thing as support and I think the OP needs to be very careful he isn't simply taken advantage of again through guilt tripping or legal ramifications. Remembe…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 06:21 AM
1

Technically, sex bruises womens genitalia and I believe it is a way that clinicians determine if sex has taken place. Sex is an assault on womens tissues at least, but they don't notice it because nature reduces response to pain to ensure it continues for procreation. Sexual assault is more a violation of a woman's mental sovereignty (her body her choice) and the indignation that the choice was taken away from her than any physical assault, since sex is similar to sexual assault except for the c…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 05:20 AM
1

They are my opinions only, if that wasn't obvious, for which no backup is required: it's up to the reader to consider whether my opinions have merit. I mainly present them as a different perspective that people may not have considered. If we only spoke when we had a library of certified sources behind us, we wouldn't speak at all. I have doubts about sources anyway due to lies, damn lies and statistics. The problem is, I don't think men and women have common ground, but if we intend to be civili…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 05:07 AM
18

All men should boycott New Years Eve celebrations in London and let women see how much fun they will actually have without "predators". Then I'm sure it will be complaints of women not having any fun because of men.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:40 AM
8

If women are afraid of men, they won't be happy having men anywhere near them, including male police officers. For this to be non-discriminatory, they would need to have separate mens, womens and other safe spaces staffed by same gender people.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:40 AM
1

When rape has been twisted from the original brutal ravishing without consent to be simply sex without consent (may even be sex one minute and rape the next if the notion of consent and what constitutes it is violated), the threshold has been reduced for reporting rape. As consent becomes further twisted to include misrepresentation and eventually anything a woman feels subjectively uncomfortable about during sex, including being looked at in a way she doesn't like, the statistics for rape will …
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:31 AM
-2

The world doesn't hate them for being born a man, only some women and men and the internet is not the world. I think psychological counselling is what many men need to build up their ego strength, but since its not available to most men, the next best is to publish aspects of it on the internet to counter the hate. We can't control the hate, but we can give men something to think about in ignoring that venom as the lip-flapping it is and in pursuing a different life path that might better meet t…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 03:20 AM
1

Which is why they need to be taught to ignore such things. Someone once told me that when people say something about you they are actually telling you something about them, not about you personally: whilst it is a difficult concept to absorb and put into practice, when you have lived your life believing you need to listen to others and take what they say onboard, you actually don't and the saying makes rational sense when you think about it. Ignoring hurtful comments is not enough without option…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 03:15 AM
0

But would that dynamic be less acceptable than with another human being, especially one who holds you hostage to how much sex you will get through her own needs only? We aren't talking all or nothing here: I expect robots will become an option for some men, as will women, prostitution, self-eroticism and same sex activity. The important element is that all men are able to get their needs met as best as is practicable through a range of options, not that we only follow habit and selfishness such …
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:48 AM
1

I believe sex with intimacy with another human being is more fulfilling than just sex with a stimulation device and why we preferentially seek sex with mutually engaged partners (but self pleasuring is an acceptable alternative). I think prostitution has been deliberately denigrated in order to prevent it, when it can be an intimate interaction with the provider, if the provider treats it as an intimate experience and not just pussy for hire. I mean, sex can be pleasurable for a woman too and I …
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:39 AM
6

You can't stop women calling men trash or treating them like shit: all you can do is increase mens ego strength so they ignore the taunts and jibes (it's not about men anyway, but women projecting their issues onto men and women aren't mens responsibility as they are their own autonomous person, just like men are) and provide an alternate path for fulfilment of their own life that doesn't rely on women or enable a woman to hold a man hostage.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:02 AM
-4

Good luck with getting women to think critically and with reason: they mainly operate on emotion and refuse to consider moderating their impulses, because they think they should be able to do whatever they want without consequence. Then we are also battling in-group bias with women, no matter they henpeck themselves in private.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 01:58 AM
-7

Two wrongs don't make a right: lets not stoop to womens unreasoning emotional knee jerk responses to generate an emotional response in ad hominem arguments. I don't know exactly how we can do it, but we need to toughen men up so that offensive language is just water off a ducks back, lip-fluttering that is no more than vibrations in the air; and we need to provide men with alternate paths to achieving life fulfillment (not simply what government propagandises to keep the population and economy p…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 01:53 AM
-6

No matter what they think or are led to believe, women can't raise children by themselves: it takes 2 opposite sex parents and the resources of both people to raise children properly with appropriate identity formation (men are not failed women and vice versa and can not be ignored in their important roles). It's not appropriate to enslave a gender to harvest their resources so you can have it all yourself. Life was simpler and more honest in the past when women traded sex for security and child…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 04:43 AM
0

I think it stems from the biological nature of sex, where every incident is a potential assault on a womans chosen future by potentially forcing her to have a child against her will and by extension forced to have sex against her will. It's the indignation that she is more vulnerable than a man through forces of nature she has no power over and is subject to those forces through the roll of a dice, when she sees herself as above the animals by being human. The reality though is that human beings…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 04:06 AM
4

Unattractive and a woman but open to sex, you won't be ignored. Unattractive and a man and you will be avoided.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:40 AM
3

But its women suggesting they cut off their nose to spite their face first, without considering the consequences. Note that in this fictitious scenario, men don't seem to get a choice, just like in every other scenario: it's the woman choosing for her own needs without regard to any consequences to anyone else. Cue Eve in the Garden of Eden all over again, but with a modern twist of being expelled from paradise into a collapsed society by their own hand and choices. Demolish everything that has …
/r/MensRights28/12/22 03:01 PM
1

It's not about incompetence, but the reality that men do the majority of the vital work that keeps society running: without men there's still the same work that needs to be done, but with less than half the previous workers to do it. The number of houses catching fire or plumbing getting clogged up is not going to necessarily halve just because men are not around and women will not be safe, because many crimes are also perpetrated by women on women: women might be safer, but absolute safety is l…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 02:57 PM
1

Even fictional characters are based on kernels of truth otherwise they would be unrecognisable with no affinity or identification.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 02:34 PM
0

However, this trans-man is still looking at a man's life through the conditioning of being a woman and then projecting that as a judgement onto men: from a womans perspective, sure the relative isolation of men is a shock, but it doesn't mean that men see it the same way or that it is "wrong" for men, just that it is not how a woman experiences life; it doesn't mean a woman's experience is how it should be for everyone and men should be women with penises. As a man I see how women relatives act …
/r/MensRights28/12/22 02:27 PM
2

Prostitution has always been curtailed and is under increasing pressure to be prohibited now because it allegedly exploits women. Don't expect it to be available everywhere for much longer. It's why I suggest men look wider for other options.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 11:37 AM
1

How do you know they are not choosing conformity?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:23 AM
1

If you are still able to convince women to have sex with you, then none of this really applies, but if you can't (which is an increasing situation for many men), what are you going to do with your preference then, become a monk?
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:19 AM
1

Why does it matter so much to be straight or thought of as straight? Straight men have less options for sex to the point that virgin males are contemplating suicide because they don't feel capable of attracting women for sex and they don't see any acceptable alternative to explore. No matter how straight you are, why is the thought of sex with a man so abhorrent that they would prefer to suicide? Sex with a man is not repulsive: most men who masturbate do so with male parts and by male parts yet…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 06:14 AM
1

Most straight men will want sex with women, but if circumstances mean they can't get it, do they just remain celibate or do they consider other avenues? I refuse to consider the men having sex in prison are all gay. Perhaps habit becomes so entrenched, straight men can't even think outside the box or sexual orientation becomes an excuse to not even try. It's interesting to consider men whose wives die, how long they deny their sexual needs with excuses that are bourne by habit and societal condi…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 01:49 AM
1

The sub is about mens rights, not the rights of Spock. Men reason but so do women, its just that women struggle against a much greater primitive emotional impulse before reason gets a look in and so their reason gets postponed until after they have acted on impulse and because they have never been taught or been required to wait before responding and consider other interpretations. Men are not perfect reasoners either, we also feel emotional impulses, but we seem to be able to bring reason to be…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 01:33 AM
0

The OP has place in the universe simply through the miracle of the act of creation of life: it imbues a fundamental worth on its own. I dare anyone to challenge the creator as to the worth of any creation. The value of the OP to anyone else is not their concern. I encourage the OP to consider what their fundamental needs are and to explore how to attain them individually, not what society says they should want and how to do it and especially not in making one woman the sole provider of those nee…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 01:13 AM
0

A single consult with a therapist is not going to change his life either, but may cost as much.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:06 AM
1

You left out sexual fulfilment by methods other than sex with a woman, such as more fully exploring your own erotic potential and exploring the possibility of recreational sex with other men. Up till now, men have not had reason to explore anything other than the habituated sex with women, but more men are not being chosen for sex than ever before and sex with women carries not only a risk of baby-trapping and unwanted pregnancies, but also extortion and accusation of rape charges. Taking women …
/r/MensRights26/12/22 11:54 PM
1

I hope you are still exploring other avenues of meeting your fundamental needs as a man, that don't involve being held hostage to women or taking advantage of women: the kind of exploration men should be doing to achieve that win-win solution I mentioned, that women aren't interested in participating in and which men will have to journey alone, in company with other men. Sex has become so intertwined with procreation and its need for women, that men have been habituated to not look at other opti…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 06:39 AM
1

The greatest myth perpetrated on the public is that men can't enjoy human connection with other men that involves sexual enjoyment. It's not about being gay or sexual orientation but circumstance. Sexual orientation is the majority default position as its tied to procreation and thus women, but when there is a lack of women participants, you still have sexual enjoyment desire and only a small part of sexual activity was ever in the service of procreation, most of it is in sexual enjoyment which …
/r/MensRights26/12/22 01:33 AM
3

I refuse to believe women can't be rational: they are human after all, but their emotional sensitivity is higher than men so they have to work harder to moderate their emotional impulses. If men are expected to moderate their emotional impulses and urges for the greater good, then women should be expected to do so as well. Men should be acting as moderators of womens emotional excesses, but there are too many simps selling out the future of society for destructive knee-jerk impulse policy for th…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 01:14 AM
2

Why explain anything to women? If they want to understand something, tell them to Google it. Only give yes/no answers to questions or provide instructions, never explain to women. It's unfortunate, because without knowing the why of things you can't solve similar problems: give a man a fish and he eats for a day; teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime. Women just want to be given fish.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 04:49 AM
1

That's the thing though, society wants children to feed the economic machine, but doesn't want to pay for it, so it denies responsibility and places it on the parents, which is fine if both parents chose to have a child for their own purposes and society just jumps on their coat-tails, but the reality is that men often don't get an informed choice (either through arranging conception with her partner and going ahead with a pregnancy or using the sperm from another man and defrauding her partner)…
/r/MensRights25/12/22 04:28 AM
2

Where are all these women going to get their resources from if they leave the marriage, especially if times are tough? Tough times usually mean tough for everyone.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 04:06 AM
2

What other forum provides it with an international audience?
/r/MensRights24/12/22 03:41 AM
1

Women don't yet control mens self-eroticism, ability to develop meaningful friendships with other men, legality of same sex activity, or dog ownership, which means there are still potential options for men to get their fundamental needs met from sources other than one woman. Access to prostitution is being progressively inhibited, which removes another option and if you want a child, your options are severely limited.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 03:33 AM
6

Feels means you are responding emotionally to what is being said and finding ways to attack it (mainly by exagerating the most extreme interpretation in order to destroy the argument aka strawmanning), not reading with reason and an open mind to other interpretations. Sex is not a level playing field between the sexes: women have all the power and power corrupts, yet men still have a sex drive that needs to be expressed. Suppressing that sex drive will result in frustration and consequences. Soc…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:37 PM
1

But complaining about every example of bullshit is becoming all consuming with nothing being done about creating or implementing mens rights to change anything. We could do both but we aren't and I suspect that is because there aren't any mechanisms to create and enshrine mens rights or better still, fundamental human rights; it seems like such an impossible task we are falling back on complaining. Perhaps we should be talking about the lack of avenues for implementing mens rights and why and ho…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:21 PM
7

However its not as easy as just calling the relationship over: there is an ongoing cost for men, especially if there are children, that women don't have to pay and if a relationship ends, a man is faced with the same potential situation again with any woman because society is biased towards women. Women don't owe men sex, but there's hell to pay if men don't owe women happiness or taking out the garbage.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:14 PM
4

The problem is the complete range of discomforts is being labelled as "sexual assault" as if they are all the same, when at one end it is an unwanted glance and at the other, brutal damaging ravishing. Even rape is now being used whenever there is no consent, despite it being acceptable sex one second and then rape the next (when consent changes) and the actual physical act has not changed. That makes it very easy to claim technical sexual assault in the statistics for trivial things as if they …
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:04 PM
7

Then we agree on something, because I don't believe the way for men to get their sexual needs met is by conquest of women or gaming women: it's by understanding what men need fundamentally and finding easier ways to achieve those needs than trying to negotiate with someone who not only holds all the cards but doesn't operate on reason. Men and women have relationships for different reasons, to meet different needs.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:21 PM
0

The problem is, men don't have rights, which is why men are being negatively impacted by feminism which is creating womens rights only that simply exacerbate the issue. We can talk about negative impact on men until eternity, but it won't create and implement mens rights (or universal human rights that cover everyone) that will change anything.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:11 PM
1

If that is the extent of mens rights, no wonder men are in the predicament they are.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:01 PM
4

What do you think "game", "gaming the system", etc means? I was responding to the previous comment about improving your game. If you are a woman, you have no idea of the struggles men go through in getting their sexual needs met. Women don't have to do anything except consent, to have sex, because there is a queue of men waiting for an opportunity. Men have to pursue and encourage women to consent to have sex: it's not simply men choosing to have sex and an eager line of women just waiting. The …
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:00 PM
2

What has anyone done to actually advance mens rights except point out that we have none compared to women? Perhaps we should start to actually discuss creating mens rights for a change and not simply the hurdles against them.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 07:09 AM
42

Improving your game is basically a strategy to win against the opposition by any means possible: it's not at all civilised and is what women have been doing (ie finding ways to win). The object of life is not to win against your opponents at all costs, but to work together to achieve a win-win outcome as much as that is possible. If women don't want to work together for a mutual win-win outcome, then men should be getting their needs met in ways that don't involve being held hostage to what wome…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 07:04 AM
84

Since this is the Mens Rights sub, we should be discussing that men should have the right to satisfy their fundamental biological sex drive. Until men have a right to be sexual and to express that without every woman telling him he should suppress it for their convenience, then we are going to continue to be oppressed and forced to suppress a natural biological urge for someone elses benefit. This doesn't mean men having the right to rape women, but recognising men have needs that can't simply b…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:58 AM
-1

Did I say in the title they weren't? Read it again from a rational perspective and not an emotional impulse reaction.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:42 AM
0

The sub is not titled "Mens Rights Issues", it's titled "Mens Rights" which is much more than the issues surrounding mens rights, which we have already established through much discussion. Mens Rights is also not the right venue for helping men oppressed by women, because nothing is going to change overnight and these men need support now (and not support as in "it's all the fault of feminism"). There should be a separate sub for Mens Support.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:41 AM
0

The sub has talked endlessly about how feminism and women are impacting on men, but we haven't talked about what specific rights men should have and how to implement them. You know, the actual sub heading. The heading isn't "How women oppress men".
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:36 AM
2

There's no point continually wailing about double standards without actually doing anything, as though simply pointing out a wrongdoing changes anything because feminists aren't listening and a lot of women with them. Sadly, there has been no discussion about the lack of rights for men and how they could be introduced in a practical sense, especially considering many countries don't even have enshrined rights, only law that punishes transgression of implied rights. Trying to get laws changed to …
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:27 AM
7

Making a false accusation about any criminal activity should be treated as a contempt of court and perjury and punished: sexual offences do not require special treatment. The problem at the moment is that punishment is left up to the judges discretion which can introduce bias, so there should be defined mandatory punishments to dissuade that practice. Also, I think it is time that accusers be treated the same as the accused in being required to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the…
/r/MensRights23/12/22 12:23 AM
2

A wedding is about the couple, but more specifically for the bride. The bride is given away by her Father and the groom is supported by his best man: there's no real occasion recognised for the grooms Father in the ceremony. The only occasion for the OP is because his son would like it, otherwise there is no compelling reason for why he needs to be there. I think the OP should err on the side of his own needs in this situation: the groom is theoretically quite well catered for. There should be n…
/r/MensRights18/12/22 02:11 PM
6

Can't get much more extreme than #killallmen.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:54 PM
19

In other words, penis envy, but they can't be men, so they try to turn men into subordinate women they can henpeck.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:51 PM
2

Depends what you mean by "butt play": prostate stimulation can be external and also by internal prostate stimulation by prostate massagers that don't involve another person or even the recipient doing anything themselves; just insert a modest sized specially designed object, focus on the sensations and begin the adventure.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:45 PM
3

Women are allowed to revoke consent for whatever reason, but men aren't even given a right of consent when it comes to sex, use of their sperm or their body for 20 years (for baby-trapping). How about we give men the right of consent to match that of women, including being able to revoke it for whatever reason? I mean, we are after equality aren't we, not advantage for women?
/r/MensRights16/12/22 12:53 PM
2

It's discouraging that the only solutions you can come up with is being legally allowed to rape your wife or cancelling my arguments.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 12:46 PM
0

Men were already potentially under coercive control situations, even before false abuse claims, with women able to withhold access to sex until what they wanted was met, with whatever excuse they liked to justify it as "choice". It's not as if most men in relationships can just leave, when there are financial liabilities depending on where you live on the planet and especially if there are children involved; and where any subsequent relationship puts him potentially in the same hostage situation…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 10:54 AM
2

It's a bit difficult just having sex with someone you are attracted to if they are not interested, or more likely these days, actively hostile. In an ideal world, men would have enough interest from women for all men (and women) to find a partner, but we live in such a non-ideal world that 100% of women are chasing 20% of men, leaving the other 80% without long term relationships.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 01:46 PM
1

If you require to be sexually turned on by women, how is it that men are able to masturbate? Are they only doing that mechanically? Also, it isn't unheard of for a person to be thinking about someone else whilst having sex with a different person. I think you will find that a lot of behaviour is conditioned through continuity of status quo that it seems hard wired, when it is simply force of habit and one that is indoctrinated into succeeding generations as the norm. Consider the societal backla…
/r/MensRights11/12/22 02:46 AM
1

Heterosexual men do have a choice over sexual fulfilment as they still have the option of pursuing their full erotic potential and I think the resistance to sex with men is more a conditioned response than an absolute no-no: sex as pleasurable recreation does not have the same constraints as sex for procreation. Also, when a man masturbates, he's generally doing it with and to a man's body yet has no sexual orientation issue. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much about orientation. There are …
/r/MensRights11/12/22 01:06 AM
7

Whilst we aren't privy to all the information available to the jury, in my opinion, a policeman is in a position of authority which may coerce someone to do something they otherwise would not agree to do. I think anyone having sex after identifying themselves is opening themselves to suspicion. It wouldn't make it easy for policemen to have sexual relationships. Apart from the accusation, I think it is reprehensible that someone is incarcerated for 5 months before being judged whether they are g…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:25 PM
3

Fear creates a fight or flight response and fear of difference is a huge underlying fear motivator. It's not surprising children fear the other and band together using insults etc to engender bravado and keep the other at a distance. It takes hormones to create an interest in the other that overwhelms the fear response, yet it is still not strong enough to keep men and women together for long, which is why nature also has to drug men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be s…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:13 PM
2

The point of biology is continuation of the species, so men have powerful sex drives, women want children, sex is pleasurable and generates desire to repeat it, and nature drugs men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful because men and women aren't directly compatible; but human beings also reach for higher order outcomes such as happiness and personal choice on top of pursuing their biology. You were created to live your life, not be a slave to others validatio…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 01:55 PM
10

Women are having increasing difficulty holding men hostage, so now they are turning to boys to fuel their control mania. I don't think women will stop until males are completely subjugated and no longer able to create discomfort of any kind, then they will discover that the discomfort still doesn't stop and it wasn't males at all that was the cause.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 09:11 AM
2

As I understand it, the justice system is predicated on the presumption of innocence and someone is guilty only if judged so in a court of law by due process. If a case was dismissed, surely it means the presumption of innocence continues and you never had to prove your innocence, but the accuser has to prove guilt (which they failed to do, particularly through no-show). That was a strange thing to say by the police as it assumes guilty until proven innocent and not how I understood the justice …
/r/MensRights09/12/22 09:01 AM
1

Women are given judicial protection over lack of consent to have sex, including fraudulent representation, but men have no judicial protection over lack of consent to have a child, or fraudulent implementation of that consent, and its consequences.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 07:57 AM
3

Counselling might be of benefit to help you stop worrying about what other people might think about you, what might happen and to gain some self-reliance: we live our lives mostly as independent, separate, autonomous people anyway, although the military has likely conditioned you to a different perspective. It doesn't matter if someone thinks you are a terrible person: you know different and you don't exist on their good graces. Instead of being bothered by an occasional disgusted look, turn it …
/r/MensRights08/12/22 12:27 AM
3

Men and women face significant disadvantages, still, yet nothing is done to address that for both in a balanced way: instead one side is advantaged over the other and then it will likely turn in the other direction creating ongoing divides that shift but remain divides. Classic methods in divide and conquer, which begs the question who is orchestrating the division in order to conquer both men and women.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 11:22 PM
1

The tactics of divide and conquer: makes you wonder that if men and women are being divided, who are the ones wanting to conquer them?
/r/MensRights04/12/22 01:50 PM
7

They will simply claim abuse for being abandoned: all mens fault again.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 01:45 PM
1

It always takes two to tango, cause and effect, light and dark, men and women both contributing to the issues.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 12:11 PM
2

No point responding to you when you twist meaning, selectively interpret and strawman.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 01:04 AM
2

The alternatives that society has yet to explore: expecting one person to come up with all the answers is unrealistic. Being intoxicated means a person is functionally impaired in reasoned civilised action and thus has diminished capability of responsibility in a similar manner to someone having mental disorders. Ever hear of "not guilty by reason of insanity"? However, deliberately becoming intoxicated, knowing that it diminishes reason and potentially exposes the person and others to criminal …
/r/MensRights03/12/22 11:09 PM
2

Testosterone is a hormone that underpins biology and sexual reproduction: it's the foundation on which we exist and without it we would not be human but the equivalent of the Borg. It's not poison, but like the biology within which it is based, is a balanced, targeted system with a purpose. It's unfortunate that many women hate their own biological role, but if they have a beef, take it up with the creator, don't try to destroy those who remind you of your own internalised hatred of yourself. Wo…
/r/MensRights03/12/22 01:06 PM
2

Choice never stands on its own because there are consequences: no-one in society is permitted to choose to do whatever they like, because some of those choices violate the choices of others. Choice is necessarily constrained for the good of everyone in society. However, the choice to not participate in an activity should always be maintained: we should not be coercing anyone, but making sure they understand any risks and consequences that may apply to following a particular choice. Where that fr…
/r/MensRights03/12/22 12:32 PM
11

They should be pursued because they have just cost the State a lot of money for nothing and there needs to be a deterrent to prevent it happening again, not just the cost to the accused. At the very least it should be contempt of court and a punishment to dissuade others from repeating the attempt to pervert the course of justice. Until there are consequences to women of abusing the system for their own gains, it will keep happening. The justice system itself needs revision and resources to ensu…
/r/MensRights03/12/22 11:40 AM
5

A pandemic is an outbreak: these are things that men and women have always experienced, but are now highlighted because the definition has been widened and the bar lowered (for one gender at least). Sex itself is an aggressive act and tissues are damaged, yet women don't complain about it when they enjoy it. The issue is a woman's subjective feelings which are influenced by many factors and which conflict with the reality of biology. There doesn't seem to be any attempt to determine why a pandem…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 01:40 AM
6

It's said that women want to change their man and men hope their woman will never change: women actively pursue their wants, regardless of what the men want and mens passive hopes rarely come to pass; it's a double whammy for men.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 01:05 AM
36

I'm not convinced it is willing teenagers: all young people are at the mercy of authoritative coercion due to the power dynamic, which is why children are deemed unable to consent in other areas. The world needs to adopt bodily sovereignty including tissues as a fundamental human right which will cover everyone, including children.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:55 AM
24

They don't want to outlaw male circumcision, so the only alternative is to approve female circumcision. Feminists push against FGM could actually help fight against MGM.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:52 AM
2

Your sex drive doesn't hold you hostage, other people use it to do so: you are just starting to remove their hold over you by deliberately de-valuing sex; the other way to remove the hold would be through getting sex satisfied elsewhere. Whilst interest in sex can decline naturally with age, in my opinion men just become jaded with having to do all the work to get sex, with their partner also becoming progressively less enthusiastic which also turns off the man. He can't readily leave the relati…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 01:01 AM
7

she responded saying it was her sole decision and she'd made up her mind. Whilst it is her decision what she does with her own body, the current laws force negative consequences on other people for her "sole" decision, without any choice in the matter and she, and other women like her, don't care because they are getting what they want. It's basically supporting selfishness and the principle of "F U I got mine". Equal rights means a right to bodily sovereignty and consent required to use another…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 12:31 AM
2

Our entire system of treating the accused as guilty before being proven not guilty, in practice, needs to change when the justice system itself is based on "innocent until proven guilty": it's too open to abuse as a means of punishing someone by using the justice system grinding wheels against them; even when proven not guilty, they have already suffered punishment. Police need to be impartial and not just instruments of the prosecution: not simply taking a scene at face value on the word of som…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:16 PM
1

I don't think it is as black and white as you propose: people caught up in an emotional situation are not reasoning but operating on emotion; the more a person operates from primitive emotion, the more extreme might be their response, so women are particularly vulnerable to this. I'm not an overly emotional person, but when a first partner left me because we differed in how we saw the relationship (them just a fling but me more long term), I did things that I would never have done in a rational …
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:00 PM
3

The purpose of dating was originally to see if both people were compatible enough for a long term committed relationship, assuming that's what both wanted as its what society encouraged to grow the population and economy. Underlying this is biology which is designed to perpetuate the species through procreation by giving men a sex drive and women a drive to have children (both have sexual pleasure as an added inducement and both are drugged by nature to ensure they stay together long enough for …
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:06 PM
3

Womens rights are: her body, her choice. Mens rights are: her body, his responsibility. Women require consent to have sex, and a man is guilty of raping a woman if he violates that consent agreement, yet men don't get to consent about having children and thus it isn't considered rape to violate an agreement not to have children. Men require equal rights over consent. Without equal rights and the support of the law, men have to take their own steps to protect themselves from being raped, includin…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 01:21 PM
4

Reminds me of women in the past stamping their foot when the vacuum cleaner doesn't work as if it was a man who would kowtow to a womans feelings. Modern women making "clit-pinch" emojis is not going to make the machinery of civilisation operate if men decide to take a step back from abuse.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 01:04 AM
0

Don't need to build robots, sex with men will be more rewarding: just have to get over the homophobic conditioning of recent centuries. Men are simply more compatible with other men as they are wired the same. Nature has to drug men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to occur: that suggests to me that men and women are fundamentally incompatible, probably because of the specific characteristics required for each to play their role in sexual reproduction. The whole point of se…
/r/MensRights22/11/22 10:12 PM
3

Applies perfume, makeup, clothing that accentuates her form and displays some cleavage to attract sexual attention, then blames men for looking.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 10:03 PM
3

Stop emitting photons in my direction if you don't want me to receive them!
/r/MensRights22/11/22 09:59 PM
5

Subjective feelings aren't necessarily objective reality.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 09:58 PM
7

Human beings only exist because of sexual reproduction and its attraction and mating behaviour. Males pursuing females for sex is common in nature and not inappropriate: it's completely appropriate from a biological perspective. Women just don't like their biological roles. However, human beings are more than biology: we reach for higher order outcomes too through reason. Reason suggests people should have choice over use of their bodies but it does conflict with biology and has consequences. I …
/r/MensRights22/11/22 09:51 PM
1

Justifying women being treated differently because of their biology is a double-edged sword: they might be too frail for war and needed to raise young children, but they are designed to be impregnated to have children and men are designed to spread their seed, so you should expect women to accept sex whenever a man has the urge. You can't have your cake and eat it: pick heads I win, tails you lose. Nature is about balancing action and consequence, rights and responsibility. It was much more hone…
/r/MensRights21/11/22 02:48 AM
2

Nature always strives for balance, not advantage, although its methods are blunt: falling fertility is simply the natural counterpoint to unsustainable growth. Look at the Mouse Utopia experiment to discover a natural limitation built-in to living systems to prevent unsustainable growth that we do not yet understand. I believe society needs to go back to fundamental requirements and work forwards: survival of the human species requires sustainable procreation through sexual reproduction in which…
/r/MensRights21/11/22 02:37 AM
29

Society is inexorably moving from the age of reason to the age of "muh feelings" and reverse civilisation: you can't base civilisation on competing subjective feelings of billions of individuals that includes paranoia, there has to be objectivity. Women are cutting off their nose to spite their face by pushing men away as they are destroying any chance of their sisters having a long term relationship as well as causing men to not care about supporting society, when men are the pillars that keep …
/r/MensRights21/11/22 01:00 AM
1

How are 100% of women going to manage with only 35% of men available? It roughly means women only having a relationship with a man 35% of the year (even less if some women achieve 100% relationship): will that be enough when it inevitably means less than 35% of child support or alimony as it would be unreasonable to expect men to fund 100% if the relationship is less than 35%. Imagine that, 35% of men having a full-time relationship, with women fighting each other to get even 35%: it would reall…
/r/MensRights20/11/22 01:51 PM
3

Everyone is responsible for their own actions only. Wrongdoing should be pursued through the justice system, not by taking the law into your own hands. If this case had been sent through due process, then there was the possibility it would have been identified as a false accusation and treated as the contempt of court it was and no-one would have died. It's trying to bypass the objective, evidence based justice system by leveraging unreasoning emotional impulses that leads to the worst consequen…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 06:48 AM
-10

Literally the only thing preventing solving mens loneliness is homophobia: there are so many men out there with the same bodies, fundamental needs and loneliness problem and yet they refuse to consider sharing with another man because they might be seen as gay or feminine. Everything men do together is masculine. All men masturbate and when they do so, it is generally with a mans body parts, so what is the big deal if its another mans parts and they are giving a buddy a hand and vice versa? The …
/r/MensRights18/11/22 05:32 AM
0

Not really, the risk was the worker being hired and then after the expense of training, etc them suddenly disappearing for years to have the children they wanted. Providing men with paternal leave equal to maternal leave for less than a year is not the same thing, but it means even more uncertainty for each business because now male employees can suddenly disappear to look after their children as well as female employees, whilst women can still choose to suddenly leave employment for long period…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 05:01 AM
1

The issue isn't discrimination, its the risk to business of hiring a person who will likely bugger off for a year or so to have children, when they could have hired someone who wasn't going to be compromised in that way. It's detrimental to not have parents raise children but to force them back to work to pay for a nanny and to afford a house. The traditional family where the man provided the resources through working and the woman stayed at home to raise the kids was tailor made to biology and …
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:31 AM
2

I think society needs to recognise that sexuality is real and exists in working environments too, no matter how much we might try to suppress it, which creates conflicts and issues: therefore it is important to segregate interaction on a sex basis unless both parties are comfortable with the arrangement. It's no good taking an attitude that people will just have to behave and accept it, because biology will always out. Even easier today to operate a functional work environment with segregated st…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 12:42 AM
1

It doesn't help when women continue their natural tendency to gossip, compare, emote and criticise from their personal world, where people have a choice to get involved or not, into the working world, where it impacts other people who often are not given a choice over involvement. The examples given in other comments about women peeking under the sheet at sleeping men and sharing information in order to criticise is accepted, where men doing it is an outrage is a double standard that leads to pe…
/r/MensRights17/11/22 12:27 AM
2

The argument is that there is still bias against certain characteristics such as gender and skin colour so that positive discrimination offsets that bias to achieve equality. This is rubbish and the better application of anti-discrimination rather than offsetting it with positive discrimination should be used. One of the major problems however is procreation where women are seen as a risk to a business because of the potential for time off to have a baby. This is a real concern despite rulings t…
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:28 PM
19

Mens problems are a result of womens greater privilege in protection and being put on a pedestal: reducing privilege feels like oppression of women and thus seen as misogynistic.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:00 PM
4

It's not the majority voting in laws, but a shallow representative democracy representing its own minority viewpoint. If we had true 1:1 democracy there would still be an issue with women and simps potentially making a majority, but I kind of think not all women would side with the radicals because they understand consequences and perhaps a majority would need to be closer to 75% to prevent collusion and in-group bias.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 06:58 AM
2

Your problem is using the emotive term rape to reflect many womens experience, when you haven't defined what you mean by rape. Rape was never only about consent, it was typically violent and viscious and fear generating. Now, it's rape if a woman changes her mind whilst engaging in sex because she is uncomfortable and he doesn't interpret her actions to get him to stop quickly enough, or having regret after sex, or trying to punish a male for doing something else to upset her emotions, ... It's …
/r/MensRights14/11/22 04:35 AM
1

In nature, harassment is simply biological mating behaviour: choice doesn't really come into it except possibly at the point of engaging in sex. The difficult thing is integrating higher order effects of civilisation with the enduring realities of biology. We never have absolutely free choice to do whatever we like, because as a minimum, our choices impinge on others choices and in a philosophy of equality, neither is allowed supremacy over the other, unless offset by an opposite supremacy in ot…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 04:09 AM
1

However, womens biology is more vulnerable: for many thousands of years women have been vulnerable to their ability to get pregnant through sex and requiring support and protection to raise a child with a high risk of death in childbirth, making the choice to have sex or have sex thrust on them a fear-raising one. It hasn't helped that men not only don't have that vulnerability, but also a high biological sex drive. It's only been in the last 50 years that women have been given control over preg…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 03:59 AM
2

Narcissists are perpetually alone, even in company, as they can't see anyone but themselves. Human beings need to accept they will largely be on their own, to all intents and purposes, most of the time and this is not the end of the world. You aren't going to get to cuddle someone for more than a short period of time each day even under the best conditions, so you need to get used to the majority situation reality. This doesn't mean you can never experience something like unconditional love: any…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 03:27 AM
1

You can't have an involuntarily celibate tendency because it is something done to men not an innate characteristic: it's all in the "involuntarily" qualifier. Apart from throwing insults at men, the problem is that women can't reason the consequences of driving men away with insults: numbers of men and women are roughly equal, so every incel male means an equivalent incel female, unless women start sharing. It's an attack on women as much as it is an attack on men: their sisters are throwing the…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 01:40 PM
2

Each incel means an extra spinster: hows that for equality?
/r/MensRights12/11/22 01:25 PM
3

Wouldn't want it setting a precedent for surgical procedures as a solution over human rights: Lorena Bobbitt doesn't need any more ideas. Will they be offering this to young men first becoming sexually active, or will they reject the procedure like now with vasectomy, restricting it to men who have already had children? I think society desires more unwanted pregnancies to keep the growth ponzi alive.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 02:43 AM
2

There wouldn't be an issue if more people had home delivery: society is setup to give people dangerous weapons and place then in situations where they can use them on impulse. Judicial punishment is not a deterrent to crime where emotions are involved and because women respond more by emotional impulse than reason, it's even less of a deterrent for them. Calming down and saying sorry after you have wrecked someone elses life doesn't undo the damage. Society needs greater prevention, not punishme…
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:05 PM
10

Men shouldn't have to rely on a surgical procedure to give them some control over consent for use of their sperm: just as it is with other tissues, everyone needs the enshrined right to control what other people can do with them. Society could implement a right to bodily sovereignty that would resolve that issue that isn't dependent on the use of a medical procedure, we just haven't wanted to do it.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 12:33 PM
1

You are gaslighting by interpreting what I say in the most extreme way to trigger guilt over wanting men to have the right to rape women. I haven't advocated for that, you have, as the only solution you can see.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 11:45 AM
2

Eventually human beings have to come to grips with the reality that personal choice has consequences. If you only want guys over 6', then don't complain there are no good men to date because you have just shrunk the pool of likely candidates by your own choices. They might not even be your own choices, but simply following influencers and the Joneses to "belong" to the group. But still don't complain when your choices have consequences in your life you didn't even consider because you were so ho…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:58 PM
-1

Remote learning is not only more efficient in its provision, it's also apparently fairer too as hardware isn't swayed by fluttering eyelashes, just as the vacuum cleaner was not swayed by a housewife stamping her foot expecting it to obey her when they were first introduced.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:44 PM
1

I'm not: the solution can't come from one individual being expected to solve all the worlds problems. To request that I do and then shoot me down is just a form of gaslighting.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:24 PM
2

You can't be held responsible for something you are not permitted any control over and men have no control over womens bodies. Both are responsible for choosing whether to have sex, so that cancels out as a factor.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:20 AM
3

Infants can't consent to sex, so say hello to lonely spinsterhood for every woman and the ending of human civilisation.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 05:18 AM
1

No it didn't, it complained the fundamental issue of affordable dignity is not being addressed in lieu of only period products which only benefits women.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 04:04 AM
3

Apparently, mens biological drives are a problem for women else we wouldn't have all this fuss about sexual harassment. Womens biological drives, directed into extremely selective mate selection and choice over sex, is a problem for men. Biology is creating a problem for both that neither can walk away from because they are fundamental drives we can't simply choose to suppress without consequence or without ending human civilisation. This is the ultimate dilemma: wanting greater choice but where…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 03:57 AM
0

The Creator. Womens orgasm also helps them get pregnant as it dips the cervix into the pool of semen at the end of the vagina. So double demerit points to the Creator for being the one ultimately responsible for the whole debacle.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 07:20 AM
74

Feminist urbanism advocates for a type of urban planning that promotesinclusivity and puts the needs of women, non-binary and genderfluidpeople at the forefront of the way we think of the urban landscape. In other words, the needs of men will be forced into the background: say hello to night-time curfews for men because women are paranoid about being asked for sex cause men have biological drives and are required to pursue them rather than women offering to satisfy them. Council agrees that in o…
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:58 AM
1

Then don't push for financial abortion, but for rights to bodily sovereignty, including tissues, which covers a large area at issue in a non-gendered way. Laws are then written to support that right, including consequences should it be transgressed, that may include something like waiving child support if a child is conceived without consent, but allowing Fatherly involvement for the childs benefit if he wishes. Procreation should not be reduced to simply a financial transaction.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:16 PM
2

All men are rapists according to many feminists, because they might want sex when a woman doesn't.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 01:08 PM
1

It's not unexpected: consider that nature drugs men and women to stay together long enough for procreation to be successful (ie in love), despite sex supposedly being pleasurable for both. That suggests a fundamental incompatibility, perhaps nascent to the individual gendered characteristics required for procreation and thus unavoidable. Males and females are not the same. If that is true, then civilisation needs to accept the underlying dichotomy and try to find a more optimal way to achieve th…
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:55 PM
-1

That advice is a different way of suggesting men break their needs down into fundamental elements and find optimal ways to satisfy each element, not expect one woman to be able to provide them all whilst at the same time having to provide for all her needs: that's a huge ask on both parties, even assuming they don't change over time as well. Relationships began as a transactional thing to best meet biological drives and perhaps they should return to that state: a balanced trade of things each pa…
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:32 PM
3

Can you take this to the administration level above that of the specific district court, perhaps to the office of the chief judge? Whilst it is relevant to the specific court case, it is also relevant as a more general judicial principle in that they are attempting to pervert the course of justice. However, if it is illegal to record in that situation, it could expose you to consequences too. Whistleblowers everywhere are not well protected.
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:20 PM
14

The issue isn't really about porn or exploitation, but about the fact that "civilisation" still doesn't recognise the male need for biological sexual expression and its facilitation: instead various elements exploit regulating supply to meet other agenda (profit, personal benefit, unrealistic expectations, etc) to the detriment of men. If women were not so selective over men and wanted as much sex as men, men would not need to resort to porn or prostitution. Porn and prostitution are an inadequa…
/r/MensRights08/11/22 12:01 PM
27

It's disturbing that young men are downplaying the importance of something in order to appease authority and protect themselves as normalised behaviour, particularly in an institution that has traditionally encouraged challenging of ideas. Also worrying that the female student is being talked with rather than an opportunity taken for the class to be educated about the wrongs of hate.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 02:30 AM
2

Has it been proven to be hardcoded, or is it simply a habit indoctrinated from one generation to another starting during childhood? If you have only known one thing your entire life, which everyone supports, and you develop your own different perspective, there are powerful forces at work to prevent you rocking the boat, usually through villification and exile. I would suggest that an urge to take from a woman that which she does not wish to give, no matter that it is suppressed, is indication t…
/r/MensRights04/11/22 01:12 AM
2

It's untenable to have a justice system and in parallel a shadow justice system without the checks and balances (aka the court of public opinion or corporate manager privilege). Any wrongdoing that requires punishment should be processed through the justice system with all its protections, not through the court of public media (circus), which is effectively a lynch mob by another name, or through corporate managers. Do we wish to return to the times of the Salem witch trials? Naming and shaming …
/r/MensRights03/11/22 06:31 AM
7

It's worse than that: alleged victims are still permitted to try the accused via public media as though they are guilty, by putting only their side of the story forward and potentially biasing a fair trial, even whilst a criminal investigation is underway. They only receive a reprimand for doing it, when it is already too late and the cat is out of the bag. Grace Tame, another victim, recently won the right to be named and have their say if they wish, instead of being silenced by privacy, howeve…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:40 AM
11

Marriage isn't the only trap: just going for sex has a risk of baby-trapping or false accusation of rape or other sexual misdemeanour and depending on which country you live in, just cohabiting for a time can be equated to common law marriage (and there is nothing stopping lawmakers from reducing that cohabitation time threshold to more than one night). Society can manipulate men if it wants to, so don't expect your free lifestyle to last long once government sees the disruptive effect of men ch…
/r/MensRights03/11/22 03:25 AM
8

It's also a sad indictment of a justice system that doesn't believe in its own policy of the presumption of innocence. Complaints over a man with a child are the opposite of the presumption of innocence, particularly in the way that police might handle verification of a childs safety. Is it more likely a pedophile is out in public with a child in full view, or that it is a Father and his child? Occams razor and all that. Why don't we practice some reason? Oh, wait, it's women making emotionally …
/r/MensRights02/11/22 01:58 AM
6

There should be no rape, only degrees of sexual assault according to the level of objective harm involved: rape is an emotive term that also distorts its application to exclude certain groups for exclusive benefit. Women are trying to retain the perception of rape as the most damaging, violent, penetrative act, for its victim value, whilst being able to apply it to withdrawal of consent. The only difference between sex and rape now is how attractive a woman finds a man and her emotional state: i…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 01:27 AM
1

I despair that we pay lip-service to the involvement of alcohol in this and other similar scenarios: I'm not convinced anyone's memory is accurate during periods of intoxication and whilst one can't consent under the effects of alcohol, one can also not reason adequately to interpret consent under the effects of alcohol; it reduces the threshold to primitive impulse expression and it depresses ability to moderate impulse expression; and since its effects in incapacitating reason are known in adv…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:27 AM
3

It's not about "consent to carry my child" but about the wider issue of using the tissues of another person without their explicit consent. There can also be a potential for copyright infringement in that the sperms DNA would be replicated in the child without his consent. What if a woman harvests a mans sperm to sell to someone else? That should be illegal, not simply using a mans sperm to conceive a child without his consent. By making it a criminal offense to use someone elses tissues without…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:27 AM
9

Plain old discrimination and double standards.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:08 AM
1

Higgins may have been raped, however our judicial system requires people be deemed innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law: we must approach this as the accused is innocent and the court must prove their guilt, not that we think the accused is guilty and the court should validate that perspective. I have always been uncomfortable with the considerable forces arrayed against the accused, whilst they are relatively defenseless, in particular the contradiction between…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 03:55 AM
2

Men can not be responsible for reproduction because they have no control over whether a child exits a womans body, all other things being equal (ie choosing to have sex). Choice of partner also does not guarantee outcome as it is not possible to know which women will sabotage contraception, lie about it in advance, or cuckold a man for example. Men have no llegal control over women's behaviour or even the power of consent over use of their sperm. There are many ways a man can be entrapped by a w…
/r/MensRights01/11/22 02:45 AM
7

Also, even if 50% of marriages end in divorce, it doesn't say how many years of happiness might be experienced before it falls apart and I think many men are optimists. The problem is that happiness only really exists whilst trying for children as that is when a man is most sexually satisfied and without extra responsibilities. When children do come along, everything changes: child rearing is difficult and the sex generally declines. Child rearing is difficult, even with 2 committed parents will…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:38 AM
6

I think the opposite: if men stopped getting married, women would make government change the law to force men to provide resources and semen. It's happening already with baby-trapping and obligations to support offspring that aren't his and would just get worse.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:24 AM
8

More importantly, the kids need to be exposed to more than one perspective so they have a balanced outlook on life: in particular, the difference between emotion and reason. I think the OP was wrong in only making it about his value in comparison to the plate as he came up with other reasoned justifications why it was not such a big deal but kept it to himself. Her plates, but he was making breakfast and thinking of the comfort of those being served. Perhaps she should be making breakfast with h…
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter