TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Vose4492 Archive

View 7 posts and 52 comments by Vose4492 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

> Therefore, legal paternal surrender can benefit women too. That is one thing that feminists fail to realize.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 01:05 AM
14

Tell me that feminists only want equality when it benefits them without telling me feminists only want equality when it benefits them.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 02:44 AM
1

> Taxes don't exist to shield people from poor choices How do you know that the people who invented the concept of taxation did not intend for taxes to shield people from poor choices? If the fire department comes when a fire occurred due to negligence, that fire occurred do to poor choices. In that regard, taxes are being used to shield people from poor choices. In the event that one parent wants to give the child up for adoption and the other wants to keep the child, it makes logical sense for…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:32 AM
3

The child will live in a society where a woman raping a man does NOT result in the completely blameless victim of rape being forced to pay child support to his rapist.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 08:28 PM
1

> Besides cases of rape, I think the people who create the child should be the ones paying for it, Opting out of parenthood should only be allowed in cases of rape? How would that work? Do you have to prove that you where raped before you can be exempted from financial responsibility or do we start with the assumption that you are telling the truth and then exempt you from financial responsibility until and unless it is proven that you are lying? > not our taxes. Technically, taxpayers supportin…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 08:25 PM
3

This day in age, feminist has become a pejorative. Let me tell you what I think. I sincerely believe that men and women should have all the same rights and opportunities under the law. Equal treatment extends past just legal issues, social equality matters too. The first wave of feminism, which began in the 1890’s, was a wonderful thing. The primary focus of the movement was on gaining women the right to vote. It was mostly active in the UK, the US and Canada. It gained women civil liberties, in…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:05 PM
3

Feminist: If you believe that men and women deserve equal rights, opportunities and protections under the law, equal pay for equal work and that trans women are women, you are probably a feminist. Me: If it really is that simple, why is it that even feminists themselves can’t seem to agree on what feminism is truly about or what the ulitmate goals should be? Feminism is fragmented into different denominations, with conflicting beliefs and dogmas. Some feminists are liberal feminists ( https://ww…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:04 PM
1

> You can’t make a housewife continue her household duties after a divorce. Do you literally mean that such a practice is unrealistic? Or, do you simply mean that that is not how it works currently? I have, in my mind, an idea. Traditionally, when you demand alimony, it is not granted automatically. The lower earner has to go to court and demand it. When the lower earner makes that demand, the lower earner must explain what sacrifices they made in order to help the higher earner get where they d…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 11:45 PM
2

> What would your model look like? Read the original post, it sounds to me like that is what OP is trying to figure out. I have, in my mind, an idea. Traditionally, when you demand alimony, it is not granted automatically. The lower earner has to go to court and demand it. When the lower earner makes that demand, the lower earner must explain what sacrifices they made in order to help the higher earner get where they did in their career. I am pretty sure that is how it works. At that point, if t…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 11:35 PM
3

Yes, both spouses have to continue fulfilling their spousal duties following the divorce. That sounds like a great idea.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 10:20 PM
1

A lot of young men (young people in general) find that marriage and having children is a fulfilling life path. Even if you do not want to have children, you still might want to get married. That said, discuss your values very early in the relationship, so that you will decrease your divorce risk and make it more likely that, if you do get divorced, it will probably be amicable.
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:01 AM
1

How did the taxpayer have a say in it ? In the hypothetical which I described (the father wanted the mother to abort and she gave birth against his wishes) the father had no say in the mother's decision to bring a child into the world, neither did the tax payers. The father and the tax payers should have equal responsibility to the child, since they had equal say in the decision to bring the child into the world.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:31 PM
1

I would like to add one more point. I did not mention this in the original draft of my post, but after one commenter brought this to my attention, I edited my post so as to add this point. If the prenup would literally leave the lower earner with no way to make ends meet in the event of a divorce, there is a very good chance that the prenup will be deemed unenforceable. That said, if you are anti-alimony, you should talk about that before getting married. If you would like for both you and your …
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:26 PM
0

I would like to add one more point. I did not mention this in the original draft of my post, but after one commenter brought this to my attention, I edited my post so as to add this point. If the prenup would literally leave the lower earner with no way to make ends meet in the event of a divorce, there is a very good chance that the prenup will be deemed unenforceable. That said, if you are anti-alimony, you should talk about that before getting married. If you would like for both you and your …
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:25 PM
0

I would like to add one more point. I did not mention this in the original draft of my post, but after one commenter brought this to my attention, I edited my post so as to add this point. If the prenup would literally leave the lower earner with no way to make ends meet in the event of a divorce, there is a very good chance that the prenup will be deemed unenforceable. That said, if you are anti-alimony, you should talk about that before getting married. If you would like for both you and your …
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:25 PM
1

I would like to add one more point. I did not mention this in the original draft of my post, but after one commenter brought this to my attention, I edited my post so as to add this point. If the prenup would literally leave the lower earner with no way to make ends meet in the event of a divorce, there is a very good chance that the prenup will be deemed unenforceable. That said, if you are anti-alimony, you should talk about that before getting married. If you would like for both you and your …
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:24 PM
4

If the father signs his name on the child's birth certificate and agrees to take care of the child, he should not be allowed to change his mind later if he regrets that decision. However, if the father wanted the mother to abort and she gave birth anyway just to spite him, it makes logical sense for each tax payer to have as much financial responsibility to the child as the father does, because each tax payer had as much say in the mother's decision to keep the child as the father did.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:23 PM
6

Here are two sentiments that are equally offensive and make exactly the same amount of sense. There is no such thing as misandry, just women who have had bad experiences with men. There is no such thing as racism, just white people who have had bad experiences with black people. To see what I am talking about check out these links. https://youtu.be/rQv8VuLpKN4?si=cvxNdUjizqdEMrvr https://youtu.be/qVKvEaokV6I?si=kg40VCa6dA4Rnk-L
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:25 PM
76

There is legitimate empirical data to suggest that the majority of body shaming is done by women. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36380247
/r/MensRights23/02/24 05:22 PM
1

Remember, child support and alimony are not the same thing. I for one believe that you should be able to opt out of financial responsibility to an unwanted child ( https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalOpinions/comments/17d9ezv/you_should_be_able_to_opt_out_of_financial/ ). Alimony can be paid, even if the couple has no children. The point about child custody makes sense if the person with whom you are arguing is in favor alimony being paid exclusively when the couple has children, but not all suppo…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:47 PM
1

This argument took place online, so I do not know what genitalia the other person had. You should know that I have a vagina and I pushed two babies out of it. I am have a husband, a 4 year old daughter and a not even two year old son.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:43 PM
-5

Eterna_Caelestina. Remember, child support and alimony are not the same thing. I for one believe that you should be able to opt out of financial responsibility to an unwanted child ( https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalOpinions/comments/17d9ezv/you_should_be_able_to_opt_out_of_financial/ ). Alimony can be paid, even if the couple has no children. The point about child custody makes sense if the person with whom you are arguing is in favor alimony being paid exclusively when the couple has children…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 12:28 AM
3

Shoe On Head some quite a bit to say about this issue. https://youtu.be/rQv8VuLpKN4?si=TspZVJv0XwZx5bBG https://youtu.be/qVKvEaokV6I?si=KRBF_-vOViYzapP9
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:40 AM
1

I happen to advocate for the right to opt out of financial responsibility to an already born child ( https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalOpinions/comments/17d9ezv/you_should_be_able_to_opt_out_of_financial/ ).
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:38 AM
3

I would recommend asking a woman what she means when she advocates for 50/50. To me, 50/50 means that you are equal in authority. That is where a spousal relationship differs slightly from a parent child relationship. If you have children (particularly if you have them the old fashioned way) then true equality of outcome is impossible. Females can give birth and males cannot. Statistics show that less than half of women believe that it is the man's responsibility to pay on the first date. Men ar…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 10:56 AM
1

To hear some helpful advice on how to flirt without being creepy, check out this link( https://youtu.be/BVYuMhjk58o?si=UEid-5k9Ytaf0m4_ ).
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:17 AM
0

The statistics showing that women live longer than men are true across the animal kingdom. In pretty much every species, the females outlive the males on average ( https://www.bath.ac.uk/announcements/scientists-investigate-why-females-live-longer-than-males/ ). Based on that, it is logical to assume that this is a side effect of testosterone, either as a direct chemical interaction or the behaviors to which testosterone predisposes you. However, I think that there is more to it than that. In pr…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:15 AM
1

There probably exist people who believe that women cannot rape men, but I do not think that the people who hold that belief are in the majority. I have never seen any statistic to show that most people believe that.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:05 AM
1

America has a racist and sexist history. Women were not allowed to vote until 1920 ( https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxix ). Many other countries have just as bad a history. Saudi Arabia did not lift the ban on women driving until very recently ( https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44576795 ), women in Afganistan cannot show their faces ( https://asiafoundation.org/2010/01/27/womens-biggest-problems-in-afghanistan-2/ ) and female genital mutilation is very common in Somol…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:02 AM
1

Swift's music promotes domestic abuse? What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:59 AM
1

This is just one of many reasons why professional relationships and friendships do not need to and probably should not overlap ( https://youtu.be/PnEEQ3RUBaE?si=jbVDbrJxEpNbX2M9 ).
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:57 AM
1

That is so true; https://youtu.be/eg0jsXNxzLI?si=DZE-OtA_uzlYu7aJ https://youtu.be/8Ftr5Ywr5OY?si=RLjWYI77zdxByjNJ
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:55 AM
1

Someone has been watching Bill Burr ( https://youtu.be/I745Ajeq_B8?si=3iTAmJbOoc1o089K ).
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:52 AM
1

To hear a nuanced and carefully examined explanation as to what loneliness is, from Rachel Oates, click this link ( https://youtu.be/d2yApMSTUNY?si=KJYX2kmna7PUlLYS ). To hear about the epidemic of loneliness among young people today, check out these links; https://youtu.be/rQv8VuLpKN4?si=_9eaIGvjMh44Xzch https://youtu.be/qVKvEaokV6I?si=gFIYUs_3WrWM8GX2 To hear some helpful advice on how to form meaningful connections, check out these links; https://youtu.be/XoqPL0nczfY?si=zU_eFrZM1o5vBASq https…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:51 AM
1

Watch this video by Sydney Watson ( https://youtu.be/E4xYz6WFlcY?si=M3NCObsuf7UowRQj ).
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:48 AM
1

In the case of prostitution, I do not think either the prostitute or the john should be arrested. In my view, it makes no sense that you can be arrested for selling something that is legal to give away for free.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:45 AM
1

I think prostitution should be legal. Consensual sex is legal, paying someone to do you a service is legal, paying someone to have sex with you should be legal.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:44 AM
1

There exist people who believe that men's right activism and the manosphere are the same thing. That is not to say that that is necessarily what OP claims, but there exist people who believe that. They are in fact two different things. https://youtu.be/EkgffFSYRRM?si=HdWaIdPu9x5GVVEd https://youtube.com/shorts/Dlht4D60lMQ?si=n_xOjPfIBRJex4V5 https://youtu.be/kyPeKKH2PEU?si=5e45EJM4gwnh_-JY https://youtu.be/iumH0BS8OVk?si=DlAC6wvDeqtdn7L4
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:43 AM
33

It is like Bill Burr pointed out, feminists claim to want equality, but in reality they view a man's life like a buffet. They only want the good stuff about being a guy. https://youtu.be/FjLT-xI8_MA?si=zTe6BnVturAZ-RIq They feel that women should get paid the same as men, but then men should still be expected to pay for everything when they go on a date. They complain that most CEO's and politicians are men, but they are suspiciously okay with the fact that most people who work in sewers are men…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:34 AM
12

There was that one episode of the 90's situation comedy Home Improvement where Brad (the oldest of the Taylor boys) began dating a girl who embraced traditionally feminine roles like cleaning up after him. Jill (the mother) took issue with this, even though the girl whose name I cannot remember said that she was okay with it. I have never seen any sit com where a teenage boy decides to take a girl to dinner and pay the bill and the parents of the girl take issue with that. Think about that, it i…
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:32 AM
1

Marriage is a very fulfilling life path for the majority of people ( https://www.inc.com/melanie-curtin/want-a-life-of-fulfillment-a-75-year-harvard-study-says-to-prioritize-this-one-t.html ). Dangers like alimony can be avoided if you get a prenup. There are several ways that a prenup can be voided, so talk to a lawyer and make sure that none of those apply to your situation. Getting a prenup would not be necessary to avoid alimony if alimony where abolished.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:45 PM
1

You dont make arguments against alimony. Sure you do. You make arguments against alimony, because it is an outdated system. You tell any man you can find about dangers of marriage and alimony. Those dangers can be avoided if you get a prenup. There are several ways that a prenup can be voided, so talk to a lawyer and make sure that none of those apply to your situation. Getting a prenup would not be necessary to avoid alimony if alimony where abolished. If men dont marry there would be no alimon…
/r/MensRights27/01/24 03:44 PM
36

If you quit your job, you no longer receive a paycheck. That is because reaping the benefits of having a job is supposed to carry with it the expectation that you keep your job. Similarly, reaping the benefits of married life is supposed to carry with it the expectation that you will remain married. If you wish to reap the benefits of married life without the expectation to stay married, you are the one who should have to put it in writing that you will have your cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 07:59 PM
0

You can disagree with the facts and reality of life What fact of life is bigelow6698 denying? It is a biological fact that sex carries with it the potential to procreate. However, to claim that consent to sex equals consent to parenthood is a philosophical proposition that cannot be proven or disproven. In some previous comments, bigelow6698 made some good points that you did not address. Point #1: Imagine if a child is brought into this world, both biological parents want to give the child up f…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 10:46 PM
1

Milk and Honey. I am glad that you are in favour of paper abortion for men. However, I take issue with your statement that it should never be normalised. Imagine three friends of yours (two males and one female). The female tells you that she is having an abortion (even though the man who impregnated her wants her to keep the baby). This is a tough decision for her, because she knows people are going to call her a baby killer. The first male friend tells you that the woman carrying his baby is h…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 10:44 PM
16

The custodial parent seeking financial support from the non-custodial parent is the only way for the child to receive support. Imagine two hypotheticals. Hypothetical #1: The custodial parent chooses not to seek financial support from the non-custodial parent. Hypothetical #2: The custodial parent seeks financial support from the non-custodial parent and the latter does not pay the support. In both of these hypotheticals, the child does not receive financial support from the non-custodial parent…
/r/MensRights03/11/23 01:00 AM
1

To hear about the 80/20 rule from someone who does not agree with it, click this link ( https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/yk4mnh/8090_of_women_only_date_the_top_1020_of_men_and/ ).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 02:37 AM
7

I have a son and a daughter. I hope that my daughter grows up to be nothing like these feminist idiots and my son grows up to be repulsed by women like this. A lot of people are petrified of strangers because of trauma. If you where molested as a child and now you are so afraid of people you do not know that a stranger yelling "excuse me" triggers you to run for the hills, then I understand. I am sympathetic to the tale of someone who is that traumatized. We, as a society tend to name call peopl…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 06:23 PM
2

I know exactly what you mean. I will tell you that it is not particularly fun being hit on by random strangers in public. Usually when I tell a man that I have a husband, he backs off, realizing that he cannot possibly compete with the man who I already know and who fathered my children. Trying to win the heart of someone who is already married to someone else would be like trying to sell a car to someone who already owns a car. When I tell the man that I am married and he still remains persiste…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 05:38 AM
1

You mean this video ( https://youtu.be/SrB50nnBLjk )? Yeah, I watch that video. OP only instructed us to watch from 1:33- 2:15, but I watched the entire video.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 06:55 PM
0

If women are expected to be agreeable and primarily focused on a man’s happiness, and she is held to this expectation specifically because she is a woman, that is problematic. However, when a person makes a movie and features female lead who is agreeable and fun, focused on her man’s happiness and only there to support him, that does not mean that the people who made the movie believe that any woman (real or fictional) needs to be that way or that it is problematic is a woman fails to embody the…
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:14 AM
2

When someone says “If you object to one, you should object to both,” they aren’t saying that they object to either. They are saying that anyone who is offended by the manic pixie dream girl trope but perfectly okay with the male equivalent is guilty of an unfair double standard. That is called gender equality, where the punishment is meant to match the severity of the crime, not the genitalia of the victim and/or perpetrator. I see nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter