TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Wolfsouls Archive

View 4 posts and 3,593 comments by Wolfsouls on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,593 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lying and theft/murder are on totally different levels of "wrong". I don't consider lying to be all that "fucked up, especially compared to direct physical harm. I know the guys I've dated have probably lied to me about a few things, and I don't feel disgusted by it. What if my gf is lying to me and isn't who I think she is Everyone lies occasionally, even your girlfriend, I'd imagine. Try not to let it keep you up at night, sport.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/17 01:39 AM
1

No one "deserves" anything beyond basic human rights and respect. Lol, I'm not "robbing" anyone of anything, I'm looking out for number one and putting my best foot forward. People lie to the ones they love all the time, and most white lies are never revealed. Ideally, I'd want a guy who is sex positive, but I'd still be playing the odds by revealing my n count. I'm lying about how many dicks I've had inside me, not how many people I've killed or how many years I've spent in jail. It's not a big…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 10:39 PM
1

I don't care about their ability to make an informed decision. They don't "deserve" to know the details of my private sexual past. My sexual history is no one's business but my own. So, no fucks given.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/17 07:05 PM
5

Good! These are the kinds of rationalizations bottom-tier men will use in the future. Attractive men will always choose cis women, because cis women have real female hormones and body parts, and they can make babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 06:58 PM
3

No, who's in the room is irrelevant. I'm the hottest girl he can attain at his current smv, and I have the most compatible personality of the girls he can attain. I'm ok with that, it doesn't make me insecure. I have other "better" options available to me at any time as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 01:50 AM
2

I work tonight, so I won't get to watch it until tomorrow :(
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 10:00 PM
4

The future is 60% of men fucking transwomen, while the attractive men fuck cis women :)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 09:40 PM
4

How do you get around the inevitable fact that there's thousands of women out there who are either (1) as hot as you or (2) hotter than you? By being aware that I'm hotter than a lot of other people, but that there will always be someone hotter than I am. I don't dwell it, I just try to work with what my genes have given me and look my best. If he were in the room with one of them then he would be (1) just as turned on or (2) even more turned on So? If I were in the room with someone equally or …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 09:05 PM
10

Desperation is desire for ANY woman, which is very unattractive. But, intense desire for YOU specifically is extremely hot and necessary for good sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/17 06:03 PM
1

No it's provided by taxes and bonds And the community pays for those. charity is provided by the community People are naturally selfish and greedy, very few people are all that charitable, that's the reason why taxes aren't voluntary. Also ending welfare while eliminating taxation would cause massive economic growth And it would also cause massive growth in death and disease, not to mention a decrease in public safety. What do you think pays for roads to be maintained or for police and emergency…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 09:21 PM
1

Isn't welfare technically provided by the community?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 09:11 PM
3

Thoughts bleed into actions. Regardless, I don't think feminism is in the business of thought-policing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 08:11 PM
2

You don't have to think about "everything else", just don't let your lust get in the way of acknowledging and respecting them as human beings. It's really not that hard. An objectifyer leers openly without regard for the other person's discomfort, a normal person takes a quick glance and doesn't make the attractive person uncomfortable. Enjoying the way someone looks and feeling attracted to them is not objectification, it's something everyone does. Humans are visual, we like good looking people…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 08:04 PM
4

That sounds like an individual problem. Most people can think someone is sexy while respecting their humanity simultaneously.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:41 PM
3

You can find someone attractive and still view them as a complete human being with their own desires and thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:35 PM
4

Thinking someone is hot isn't the same thing as sexually objectifying them...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:30 PM
1

Personal responsibility doesn't negate public health crisis's When it comes to vaccines, I completely agree. But, sexual health is very personal, and I don't think society has any place telling people what to do with their genitals. Your rights end where mine begin.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:19 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with sexual hedonism, but there is something wrong with being reckless and negligent regarding safety and health. Similarly, there's nothing wrong with driving a fast car, but there is something wrong with driving a fast car without car insurance and a seat belt.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:02 PM
1

You're free to ask your partners for their recent test results. Responsible adults use condoms and get screened for STDs regularly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:59 PM
1

Sex negativity everywhere! So sad that some men are perpetually haunted by ghosts of dickmas past.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:55 PM
1

Ending all types of welfare would literally kill people. Forcing people to marry their baby-mamas/baby-daddies wouldn't result in as much death and suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:35 PM
1

Civilizations are made up of families, families are made up of individuals, and harming an individual harms the civilization. Also, all of this faux concern for "civilization" and "society" is bullshit. If people actually cared about reducing single motherhood, they'd reinstate shotgun marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:23 PM
1

Lol, probably. But, they're still capable of having emotional affairs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:13 PM
1

Some natural instincts (ones which directly result in physical harm) are obviously dangerous and immoral to indulge.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:11 PM
3

Now it's genetics, now it's not genetics Gee, it's almost like the world is multi-faceted and full of nuance! I'm done with this terrible excuse for an "exchange" of ideas. Every comment of yours comes down to a poorly executed attempt to paint me as a racist. You have nothing to offer in the way of a conversation. Adieu.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:04 AM
1

A semi reliable indicator that whites are the master race, not the end-all-be-all :) Ugh, no. Stop pushing this bullshit. It's a semi reliable indicator that an individual man in question has the cunning and perseverance to rise high in social hierarchies. That's why women find it attractive. But the ones with that and money are mostly white :) So? That's a problem with income inequality and capitalism. A problem that can eventually be solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 07:01 AM
1

Social status is a proxy for genetics after all :) A proxy is a semi-reliable indicator, not the end-all-be-all. And most of those aren't going to be non whites by your definition There are tall, broad shouldered, wide-jawed men of all races. GENETICALLY INFERIOR MALES? :) If a male is actually genetically inferior, then he won't get an opportunity to reproduce. If an individual male can find any woman willing to reproduce with him, then by definition, he's not entirely genetically unfit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:54 AM
2

Women selecting high status, attractive men Never said anything about those men being white. Once again you've failed at your "gotcha" attempt. Any man, of any race, with masculine features and social status can be attractive. Genetic diversity (and therefor diversity in skin color) is good for the species. Now hop off my dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:47 AM
1

saying that white people have the best genetics and the world would be better if women only went for them Quote me where I said those exact words, please. Otherwise, kindly stfu, take your strawmen and go home.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:41 AM
1

really stupid opinions? Well, that's just your stupid opinion on my stupid opinions :) So white = master race confirmed :) You really want me to be racist so bad, huh? Sorry to ruin your fantasy. Describing human reproductive instincts doesn't make me Hitler.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:38 AM
1

"cAn yUO sToP pOsTinG LiKe a nAzI?" I don't know, can you stop communicating solely in hyperbole and strawmen? Funny, never got that impression from you before :) Social status is a proxy for genetics. I've said that several times before.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:35 AM
1

Just floating the idea that social perception might play into how people see races as attractive Of course social perception plays a role, but it's a minor role compared to our innate biological attraction ques. guess they must be the master race Can you give this shit a rest? since women select only on genetics after all :) Women select primarily for genetics, social status comes at a close second.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:30 AM
1

I don't know what you're trying to prove with that link. Black people have a higher concentration of masculine looking traits on average, which make black women slightly less attractive on average. Large jaws and noses are masculine, small jaws and noses are feminine. That's not racism. They produced the most. Therefore it must be genetics Not everything comes down to genetics, just most things. If women select whites the most it must be genetics. :))))))))))))))))) If women select whites the mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:25 AM
1

Is thinking someone is unattractive because they have large lips not racism? Think about it this way: if you would find that trait unattractive on any person, regardless of skin color, then it's not racist. Sexual selection of 'genetically fit men' will be selection of whites :) Uh, no. It will be selection of attractive, masculine men. Some of which will be white, some of which will be other races. Whites do not have a complete monopoly on attractive physical traits. They just have a higher con…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:15 AM
1

Prove that racism doesn't apply to any other race being considered unattractive :) Thinking someone might be a terrorist because of their skin color/clothing is racism. Thinking someone is unattractive because of their short stature, weak jawline, small frame and/or small hands is not racism. You're the one who said it would make the human race healthier and more attractive :) Sexual selection will, not necessarily sex pats lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:08 AM
2

Prove that racism doesn't apply to any other race being considered unattractive :) Thinking someone might be a terrorist because of their skin color/clothing is racism. Thinking someone is unattractive because of their short stature, tiny chin, and tiny hands is not racism. You're the one who said it would make the human race healthier and more attractive :) Sexual selection will, not necessarily sex pats lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:07 AM
2

Arab guys complain all the time that chicks won't give them the time of day, lol I'd argue that's because of the post-911 increase in Islamophobia. I find Arab men very attractive and mysterious looking. doing God's work I'd say :) Lol, ok
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 06:03 AM
2

Not western society, just feminists :) If you think only feminists are socially liberal, I have some bad news for you. So whites and blacks And middle eastern men, and native american men, and hispanic men. Why are you pretending other races don't exist? But whites are the main ones who can afford to be sexpats That was a super random change of topic. When did this become about sexpats?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:58 AM
2

And they're still practical today :) Obviously not, since western society is quickly recognizing them as obsolete and moving past them. So the women there will go for whitey more often, spreading the true master race further :) Are you forgetting that there are many other races out there with high concentrations of masculine looking features? Or is this just a pathetic crusade to cast me as a racist?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:50 AM
2

Which are highly practical for men and women seeking to raise offspring together :) No, they were highly practical for patriarchal tribes living in the Middle Eastern desert 3000 years ago. They're clearly not so easy to wash away, there's still constant bitching about it :) Patience. How much ground has feminism gained in its short lifespan? Quite a lot, I'd say. without any of those pesky Asian people? There are tall, wide-jawed, masculine asian men. They are just less common.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:43 AM
2

Only because of feminist brainwashing :) The only thing we're washing away are puritanical sexual mores. And if they're this easy to wash away, then they were clearly artificial to begin with. And what do you think the end result of that is? A more attractive, healthy human population. Race is a social construct anyway, there's no biological/genetic evidence of race actually existing, it's literally only skin deep. There are attractive masculine men of all races, so humanity will always have a d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:36 AM
2

And you don't win their commitment by being a slut :) You can in this millennium :) The future is bright. Hey how do you think people feel when you say women should breed out all the races that aren't white Yeah...I DEFINITELY never said that. All I've ever said is that women should breed with who they're attracted to. Women are attracted to masculine facial features, which happen to be more common in some races and less common in others. I'm just using your logic against you If you're misrepres…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:31 AM
2

A woman being dependent on a man is good for him, less likely for him to be cucked :) Having good genes is the BEST bet for not getting cucked :) Men are not the gatekeepers of sex :) Attractive men are the gatekeepers to relationships and nuclear families. They're not genetically fit if their offspring don't survive to reproductive age Which a majority do. Sluttiness does not correlate with an inability to raise children to reproductive age. You're the one being retarded, saying we should let b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:27 AM
2

A woman being dependent on a man is good for him, less likely for him to be cucked :) Having good genes is the BEST bet for not getting cucked :) Men are not the gatekeepers of sex :) Attractive men are the gatekeepers to relationships and nuclear families. They're not genetically fit if their offspring don't survive to reproductive age Which a majority do. You're the one being retarded, saying we should let babies die of starvation and shit. You're getting p ridiculous, tbh. I think I'm gonna c…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:27 AM
2

A past of being single and sleeping around or going for very short lived relationships indicates being unfit for a future relationships :) Sure, it MIGHT. And a past of jumping from LTR to LTR with no time in between to be single MIGHT indicate a dependent/insecure personality. The single mother epidemic wouldn't be a problem if we just cut welfare to them and let them and their kids all die It wouldn't be a problem if men only had sex with women they want to eventually impregnate, but I don't s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:20 AM
2

Past behavior is a strong indicator of future behaviors :) Yes, a past of cheating on an LTR would indicate a likely future of cheating. But, behavior while single is very different from behavior while in a relationship. With women who aren't sluts :) Nah. With women they have children with. Otherwise, they're just as responsible for the single-mother epidemic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:14 AM
2

Oh, so now all women aren't inherently slutty if it's an attractive man? Nice contradicting yourself Slutty does not equal unfaithful. Men aren't the gatekeepers of sex :) But they are responsible for gate-keeping and forming relationships and nuclear families :)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:08 AM
2

Men who aren't into being cucked :) Or, men who aren't confident in their genes and attractiveness. Only genetically unfit men have to fear being cucked. The men who worry about being cucked unconsciously know that no woman will want to carry their children. And sluts work against that dynamic :) More like dead-beat dads do :)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:05 AM
2

Those are facts, the conclusions you drew from them are not :) Fair enough. men are right for choosing to commit to them first :) Says who? The nuclear family in civilizations proved to be far more effective at increasing the numbers of humans and their technological prowess, so clearly it should stay :) The nuclear family, when coupled with a community of extended relatives, provides the best environment for children to grow up in.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 05:01 AM
1

Evo psych is barely a science, you look foolish by even quoting it :) Facts are evo psych now? Are you saying humans don't have concealed ovulation without a specific "breeding season"? Are you denying the fact that humans males have the largest penis and testicles (relative to body size) of any of the great apes? on this forum there are women who come from super liberal sex positive communities who still don't find sex appealing unless it's with a trusted partner Outliers do not disprove a gene…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:55 AM
2

All of this is retarded evo psych posturing, not proof Nice deflection of evidence, you're just making yourself look foolish by not even forming a counter-argument. or that it came from the man :) Men and women obviously have different reproductive instincts and strategies, but sluttiness is prevalent in both sexes, because it's useful to both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:45 AM
2

Prove it :) The entire history of pre-agricultural human sexuality is proof, the way our anatomy is "designed" is proof. Female ovulation is concealed, male testes are large, male penis heads are shaped like plungers to extract rival sperm. Sluts produce many offspring but those offspring often don't survive to reproductive age. :) Prove it :) If the slutty gene is still alive and well (which it is) then that implies that plenty of sluts successfully reproduced in the past :) Ergo, sluttiness is…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:41 AM
2

But still many choose not to Because of lingering puritanical cultural beliefs from Abrahamic religions, not from any natural instincts. You didn't :) Sluts provide no incentive for men to provide resources for them, so they produce offspring with less resources, which will be lower quality as a result :) Sluts are very attractive for sex, therefor they successfully reproduce at high rates, therefor they're genetically fit. That's based on the legitimate biological definition of genetic fitness,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:35 AM
2

But a slut is a much less safe bet That's an assumption, and a very false one. The truth is, sluttiness is in our DNA, and every woman is just as capable of sexual infidelity. There is no such thing as a safe bet. Genetically unfit people should be the ones in lower economic positions, or dying I already disproved your claim that sluts are genetically unfit. The only thing genetically unfit people "should" be is unattractive for sex, which they are. Ta-da, natural selection at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:31 AM
3

A man can't be sure if a slut will stick to him or be sure that her offspring were truly his A man can never be sure of that, even with a "virgin". It's why mate-guarding is a thing in mammals, especially during ovulation. Slut-shaming is a very extreme version of mate-guarding, originally created by fundamentalist conservative cultures. No wonder most sluts ended up in the streets in the past Fortunately we've mostly moved past that as a society :)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:26 AM
2

There's nothing maladaptive about that, sluttiness promotes genetic diversity. Also, "don't" is not the same thing as "cant".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:18 AM
3

How is enjoying sex maladaptive in an animal that reproduces sexually? If women didn't like sex, babies wouldn't be born, and humanity would have died out millions of years ago. I don't think you know what genetically unfit means.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 04:04 AM
3

has the modern age changed enough to allow for most women to accurately and truthfully state their N without fear of scaring away their SO? Unfortunately, no. Outright shaming is down, however many men still hold puritanical and misogynistic beliefs regarding "sluts". But, thankfully, sex positivity is steadily gaining traction. I always lie and say mine is in the single digits, when it's not. It's against a woman's best interests to be completely honest with N count, in this day and age.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 03:46 AM
1

5'8" is probably the BARE minimum
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/17 03:43 AM
1

K. There are attractive and masculine men of all races, some races are just more prone to feminine-looking facial features.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 05:51 PM
1

K. There are attractive and masculine men of all races, some races are just more prone to feminine-looking facial features.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 05:51 PM
1

It would if you were 6 foot :p
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 05:45 PM
4

This is a really tough choice, because I love receiving oral, and I consider it a necessary component of my sex life. I would absolutely choose contestant B, no hesitation, if his dick were another half inch larger. 6 inches is just about perfect, but 5.5 is a little too small.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 05:43 PM
1

Maybe, if I were single. Are you a handsome semi-famous musician? :P
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 05:36 PM
1

Lol, I definitely didn't say that, though! I've ALWAYS been 100% for individual freedom; sexual freedom is necessary for natural selection. If a short guy can score a woman above his league, good for him. He must be exceptional in some other category, and therefor valuable to the gene pool. It's short men who whine about having to date within their league who are committing the "heinous crime" of annoying me :P
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 05:30 PM
1

Quote where I said that, then. If he organically attracts a partner, then natural selection is still in play. No violation whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 05:04 PM
1

I never said that, lol. If a short man can attract a partner, and they want to have a family, then they should definitely breed. You're putting words in my mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 01:17 AM
1

I absolutely think you could find someone "pleasantly plump" (slightly overweight, but still attractive). Numbers don't mean shit, hip to waist ratios and fat distribution matter more than weight. Don't let any one individual rejection get you down, women typically have very specific types. Even if you were the most beautiful man in the world, you wouldn't be every woman's type.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 01:14 AM
1

Not shorter than me, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 01:09 AM
2

Women love masculine features and social status
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 12:38 AM
4

A short unmasculine/nonwhite man is as undesireable as a fat woman in the SMP, sorry if it seems unfair, but it is what it is. Men and women are different, women do not value "hard bodies" the way men do, women value genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 04:32 PM
1

Wow, looking pretty darn good (for a short guy). If you gave up on the desire to have a fit girl, you could definitely slay. Fit girls want fit tall guys, so they're out of your league. But, there are plenty of short chubby girls with beautiful faces that would probably be all over you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 04:28 PM
1

I don't believe that kind of thing could even happen, excepting for a total personality change.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 04:34 AM
1

The world definitley isn't just, but it IS large and full of variations of humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 04:33 AM
1

Potential trees are not trees, crushing an acorn is not the same thing as cutting down a tree. Potential humans are not humans, killing a potential human is not the same thing as killing an actual human. So, it's not "terrible shit". My speculation is based on evidence suggesting men have a higher inclination toward violence. Your speculation is also based on evidence, so I don't have any problems with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/17 04:32 AM
1

Truth. Thin skin is such a turn off.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 08:57 PM
3

If I absolutely had to choose between them, I'd obviously choose matriarchy, because duh, I'm a woman. But, the ideal society would be an egalitarian one that cherry picks from the best aspects of matriarchal and patriarchal societal organization.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 08:00 PM
1

intensity and passion for degrading women will grow in the hearts of men Not all men, thankfully
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 07:56 PM
1

how about we consider that women have aborted more babies than men have died in war Fetuses are not babies, like seeds are not trees. but if numbers are what you need then consider how many more women dump their babies than men do If men gave birth to babies, they would dump them at even higher rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/17 07:55 PM
3

I think he was hotter in his mid twenties, because that's closer to my age. Regardless of a man's age, he's likely to find teenagers the most attractive, and that skeeves me out. Things between me and the guy are going pretty well, I like him a lot. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 07:43 PM
2

I've read a lot of fan fiction in my time, and I've never seen any of that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 07:16 PM
7

Most women do those things for the sexual gratification of men, they're usually paid to do them for porn. Regardless, the amount of men with disturbing sexual inclinations dwarfs the amount of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 07:10 PM
7

Nope, none of that is disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 07:07 PM
1

"Looksmatch" is bullshit. The market determines SMV, not objective physical appearance. Men fucking women 1-2 "looks" points behind them is the natural order of things, porn has ruined millennial men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 05:10 PM
1

"Looksmatch" is bullshit. The market determines SMV, not objective physical appearance. Men fucking women 1-2 "looks" points behind them is the natural order of things, porn has ruined millennial men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 05:09 PM
1

"Looksmatch" is bullshit. The market determines SMV, not objective physical appearance. Men fucking women 1-2 "looks" points behind them is the natural order of things, porn has ruined millennial men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 05:09 PM
1

"Looksmatch" is bullshit. The market determines SMV, not objective physical appearance. Men fucking women 1-2 "looks" points behind them is the natural order of things, porn has ruined millennial men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 05:09 PM
8

The only disgusting or negative thing you've mentioned is cheating. Female sexuality is so tame compared to male sexuality. Having the desire to rape is more disgusting than having the desire to be fucked forcibly
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 05:02 PM
5

"Ravishment" fantasies aren't disgusting, they're normal. How many women are into "adult baby" kink or piss play, compared to men?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 04:56 PM
3

When it's predatory, controlling, desperate, and entitled it absolutely can be. Men throughout history have been sexually disgusting, sticking their dicks in anything resembling a hole. The universal male fetishization of youth also grosses me out a lot. Also, the widespread male attraction to female degradation and pain is pretty heinous.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/17 04:47 PM
1

Maybe societies aren't meant to last forever? Maybe the cycle of destruction and creation is what keeps us moving forward?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/17 05:49 PM
3

Ok, actual creeps are harmful. Creep shaming should be reserved for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/17 01:00 AM
1

That is a super sexy example of male makeup, right next to Khal Drogo
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 08:48 PM
5

But, being a slut doesn't harm anyone. Being a creep does.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 08:42 PM
1

That sounds like empathy for me, even if you don't want to attach a word to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 04:08 AM
1

I'd argue it DOES objectively exist, if it can be measured and tested.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 04:01 AM
1

i can apparently "co-feel" joy in that i find it infectious This is empathy. "Co-feeling" is a good way to put it. If you've ever experienced the "contagious yawning" phenomenon, that's also showcasing empathy. i do no co-feel negative feelings or suffering, the either leave me cold or SYMpathetic I co-feel most every emotion, it can be a hassle at times.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/17 04:01 AM
3

y tho
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/17 03:01 AM
5

Have you ever imagined being in the circumstances of another person, and felt intense sympathy for them as a result? That's empathy. The word itself may be relatively new, but the emotional phenomenon is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/17 02:51 AM
1

Consent matters, sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 10:39 PM
1

The ultimate form of sexual selfishness is rape. Men have been raping people or millions of years, therefor male selfishness is nothing new. It's an old enemy, one that we rightfully fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/17 07:13 PM
1

Keep my hair long and blonde, work out, moisturize, shave.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 11:22 PM
1

Or maybe socialization is what creates the belief in "honor" in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 11:21 PM
1

Do you think we're also attracted to symmetrical faces and fit bodies because society tells us to be? Or do you admit that inherently attractive physical traits exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 06:42 AM
2

Why? If a woman's hypergamy is satisfied, she will be more invested and loyal in her marriage, and she will be more invested in taking care of her children.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 06:41 AM
2

Single motherhood is not the ideal, the ideal would be commitment from the "alpha" father. No one dreams about becoming a single mother, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 06:39 AM
1

men, who naturally value things like honor and loyalty All humans value loyalty, but "honor" is a social construct. Men do not naturally have more "honor" than women, humans are all equally capable of backstabbing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 06:37 AM
1

this just proves women never feel bad unless they are found out Most PEOPLE only feel bad when they're found out. i'm stalking your profile for more blackpills The real "blackpill" is that women and men are equally human and therefor equally horrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/17 06:36 AM
1

Encouraging promiscuity isn't an objectively positive thing And neither is discouraging it. Promiscuity is neither moral nor immoral. Not any more. We've got slut tells to help us with it "Slut tells" have always existed, and always been woefully inaccurate. Also, we can all just assume now that all of you are sluts, and we're not too far off the mark with those assumptions nowadays Good. If everyone is a "slut", then the word has no meaning, and slut shaming can end forever :) You'll be found o…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 08:04 PM
1

5'7"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 07:56 PM
2

Lots of "you go girl" and support from other overweight girls. I think she's probably open to dating overweight guys, she doesn't seem the picky sort.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 07:56 PM
3

Height still indicates good genetic health. It's an innately attractive trait, no justification required.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/17 07:55 PM
5

The girl I mentioned in my comment is actually genuinely nice; she has always done volunteer work with the mentally disabled, loves animals, and works as a social worker. She's just confused, because she thinks that being a nice person has anything to do with romantic success. I feel bad for her, but I also feel like she needs a kind slap in the face and a wake up call.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 11:07 PM
10

"Nice girls" are mostly overweight, aware that their weight is the problem with their dating life, but believe that men should be attracted to their "character" in spite of it. A girl I went to high school with made a facebook status the other day bemoaning men on dating sites for being "shallow" and "only caring about weight". It reminded me a lot of short or ugly "nice guys" wishing women would appreciate "niceness" or "chivalry".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 10:59 PM
1

They're not known for wanting to engage in military conflict. That couldn't possibly have anything to do with modern military culture, and "don't ask don't tell" laws, right? Also, let's not pretend a majority of soldiers in ancient Greek and Roman armies weren't porking each other. The best weapons training is useless if you can't unholster it in time to get off a shot Comes with training. I think you don't understand this stuff Nice rebuttal /s exactly. Which is why I said agreement's got noth…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 10:43 PM
2

You've lived under the blanket of safety and freedom provided by good men and strong men for millennia. It's funny how every single history book I've ever read said the exact opposite. Gee, I wonder who has more credibility: hundreds of historians, or one random guy on the internet with a heavy anti-woman bias? Cite please for the claim that women were forced into pregnancies Every rape to ever result in pregnancy was a forced pregnancy. Marital rape was acceptable for thousands of years, it onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 10:37 PM
4

If it were so "ok", people would talk about the fact that they have it. They generally don't Chicken vs egg. The stigma causes people to hide their herpes. Mostly it's fat women and promiscuous women who tend to get PCOS Source for that? Doctors mostly agree it's highly linked to genetics. Which only encourages promiscuity Oh, the humanity!!! You seem to think that's an objectively negative thing. It's not. You can still get other strains of HPV, all of which cause cervical cancer Those strains …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 10:30 PM
1

Also, most of those gay, bi and asexual men won't want anything to do with any sort of military conflict. Source? Men are still men. Also, most women aren't trained in the use of handguns Most PEOPLE living in cushy first-world countries have never touched a gun in their life. That doesn't mean they could never learn, if the time ever came for it. Most can't and don't want to. I don't think you're very good at telling the difference between the two. Yeah it matters, because fire bombs and chemic…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 10:21 PM
2

You've had personal freedom That's blatantly false. Safety without freedom is just captivity. You have always had bodily autonomy Untrue. Women have been forced into pregnancies throughout history, killed if they're found to be using birth control. You've always been able to choose whether to marry False. Women were human chattel sold from their fathers to their husbands for most of history. The Christian holy book even has a section detailing the appropriate price at which to sell your daughter…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 10:08 PM
3

you don't catch an STD (condoms won't protect you from the herp) Almost everyone has herpes, but doesn't realize it. Regardless, it's treatable. you don't get PCOS That shit's genetic, not an STD. you don't get HPV or genital warts Most young women today are vaccinated against the most common strain of HPV. Genital warts can be treated. you can find a man willing to accept you after your carousel ride Just don't tell any man you're dating about your ride on the carousel. Easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 10:04 PM
1

The 70% estimate is too high. It would be more like 60%. Also, you're forgetting about all of the gay, bisexual, and asexual men who would be on women's/Chad's "side" in this hypothetical conflict. Because if some of those men decide to rape women, there's nothing that can stop them other than bigger stronger men Really? A woman is just as capable of pulling a trigger as a man is, in fact women are better shots, on average. Your observation would be accurate if we were still fighting with rocks …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 09:15 PM
9

You have a very short biological window, and I hope you'll be happy with losing it for the Cock Carousel If planned correctly, one can enjoy the CC and also get married/have healthy babies within the biological window. 16-26 is a good long decade to have fun. At 26 the eggs are still in prime condition, and you have plenty of time to weed out good husband material and have your first kid by 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 09:04 PM
3

Pumping the bottle of hand lotion next to your bed doesn't count as a "pump and dump", sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 09:02 PM
2

what are you going to do with the 70% or so of men who "arent' needed"? Not my problem. Maybe we could create something like modern day secular monasteries. They WANT to do that, but they don't NEED to. Men, by contrast, NEED sex. How can you prove that? I could just as easily switch that around and say that men don't NEED sex, they just want it. because 30% of alpha men are not going to be able to defend themselves and 100% of women and 100% of children from 50% or so of disenfranchised men Wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 08:41 PM
3

We tried letting women figure it out, they can't For how many years? A few decades? At least give women a few hundred years. Men got to have the patriarchy for thousands of years. No one knows what women want. Especially not women We want personal freedom, bodily autonomy, safety, and commitment from genetically fit men. It's not that hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 08:32 PM
9

do women really recognize these traits immediatly? Yes, women have eyes. or its all about face? For me personally: I notice height first, then face, then build.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 06:44 PM
2

Possess the good looks or charisma necessary to get casual sex. If you don't have either of those things, lower your standards to the basement. Be honest and forward about your intentions. If all else fails, try grindr.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 06:27 PM
1

Purple female INTP. I respond well to narrative learning followed by written instructions. I'm very visual but I highly prefer words to numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 06:19 PM
3

Happier, more invested mothers create happier, healthier children who eventually become more productive adults. You still haven't answered my questions. Why do we need 100% of male production and participation in modern day society? Also, as a man, you have no place telling women what their needs are. "Western society" may have existed for a long period of time, but that doesn't mean it's the epitome of societal success. If half of the population is oppressed and miserable from not having its ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 06:09 PM
3

Can you prove that as a certainty? Gene pool quality absolutely affects the health and sustainability of a population. Women who have their hypergamous insticts satisfied also probably make better mothers. So, why should we value the unique biological "needs" of men, but not those of women? Does modern day society actually NEED 100% of potential male productivity?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 05:58 PM
4

I'd argue that women NEED sexual/reproductive bodily autonomy as much as men need a sexual outlet. A woman who cannot fulfill her hypergamy is as miserable as a man who cannot fulfill his sexual desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 05:26 PM
5

Yes. All of the physical traits which signal genetic health and high levels of testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/17 04:41 PM
21

6'2 hot guy with no job wins compared to a shorter guy, for me anyway. He could always get a job later, after all. Alpha is pure genetics, first and foremost. Personality can only ruin "alpha" status, not create it (in my opinion).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/17 08:42 PM
2

Yes, absolutely. I think all contraceptives (for both sexes) should be covered by health insurance. Viagra on the other hand, definitely shouldn't be, even though it currently is. Society benefits from keeping unwanted children from being born, it does not benefit from old horndogs keeping their dicks hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/17 05:20 PM
2

I even made a point to ask her to do certain things because she is better at them Try doing them with her, make it obvious how much better she is at them, and vocalize it. If that doesn't work, her self esteem problems might be better handled by a therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 09:26 PM
2

Lol, I'm sure she has some knowledge beyond makeup. Even if it's something little like a factoid about turtles or how to sew a button, treat it like it's super interesting and helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 09:22 PM
1

Aw, I'm sorry to hear that. I'd suggest finding something you can learn from her, even if it's something small. If you treat her knowledge like it is valuable and helpful to you, maybe she'd feel more secure in herself?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 09:18 PM
3

Not at all, I like learning new things and new words. Plus, I can always just google a word and find its definition instantly. No one is born knowing everything, so it's silly to feel shame when you encounter something you don't know. I love when my current guy uses his extensive vocabulary in conversation, or his knowledge of history or music. I'm always learning from him, and I have taught him a few things as well :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 09:12 PM
1

I definitely like having a partner that I perceive as more intelligent, scholarly, and/or wordly than myself. It feels nice to look up to him, and it makes my attraction to him stronger. I don't think most men care much if their partner is more or less educated.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 09:00 PM
1

I strictly follow the hippie rule of organic recreational drugs only.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 08:59 PM
1

If it's something like weed or shrooms? Sure. Anything more intense than that and I'd be weirded out.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 07:52 PM
1

If it's something like weed or shrooms? Sure. Anything more intense than that and I'd be weirded out.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 07:52 PM
1

No one is obligated to reveal any part of their past, unless they wish to. However, I would probably feel very unsafe if I found out my partner had a history as a rapist or abuser. Thank goodness for google!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 07:39 PM
1

No, we're multi-taskers :P Makeup has multiple, simultaneous uses.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 07:36 PM
1

1: It's not from a sense of "smell", lol. It's just possessing emotional intelligence and reading body language/tone of voice. 2: You get the gist of it. It's also an emotional turn-off; a desperate man is not choosing you because he actually desires YOU as an individual, you're just the first one who would have him. So, his commitment is false and tenuous. 3: I think I'm an outlier on this one. I happen to LOVE clinginess, but only from a man who I already perceive as confident/not desperate/ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 07:32 PM
1

1: It's not from a sense of "smell", lol. It's just possessing emotional intelligence and reading body language/tone of voice. 2: You get the gist of it. It's also an emotional turn-off, a desperate man is not choosing you because he actually desires YOU as an individual, you're just the first one who would have him. So, his commitment is false and tenuous. 3: I think I'm an outlier on this one. I happen to LOVE clinginess, but only from a man who I already perceive as confident/not desperate/ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/17 07:32 PM
1

How many inches shorter/taller than you would this person have to be before you lose attraction? I'm 5'7. Anything more than inch or two shorter than myself would probably cause all attraction to diminish. Is there such a thing as "too tall" for male partners No. I'm a big fan of tall men, even the "freakishly" tall, lol. Most of my boyfriends have been at least 6'.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 06:06 PM
2

I agree, contact is very important. However, that's entirely separate from a need for sex/reproduction. Touch can be freely given from friends, family, coworkers, acquaintances, and random people with "free hugs" shirts. Dogs are also great if you're lacking affection.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:25 AM
1

People die without proper nutrition. I think everyone should have a right to food, water, shelter, and medical care, the things we'd die without. Reproductive access does not fall under the umbrella of basic needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:20 AM
1

K.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:14 AM
1

don't act like fucking Chads only is going to save the future of our species at this point Why? Does it hurt your feelings? Sexual selection is a universal good for humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:13 AM
1

Yawn
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:13 AM
2

Female morality, everybody How is morality relevant to this conversation? Everyone deserves basic human respect. Everyone does not deserve a chance to reproduce. Ironically, you're proving TRP right about how women think Ironically, you think I give a shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:12 AM
1

It's not like the most fit males weren't reproducing either Thankfully, and now we're actually able to select from the descendants of the fit males
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:11 AM
2

How much does everyone want to bet this guy is from /r/incels?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:09 AM
1

It's better for women to have the chance to hook a genetically fit man, and risk heartbreak, than to be relegated to a genetically unfit man without any say.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:08 AM
1

He'd technically still be looking "for love and companionship" In a way that is morally, ethically, and legally wrong. Point being, dont try to defend this kind of behavior Are they doing anything morally, ethically, or legally wrong? Problem is, these dudes can have casual sex, and they want to take advantage of that. They dont want to settle down and become monogamous So?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:07 AM
1

And that is logically relevant to human reproductive habits, how? Go back to incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:05 AM
1

And the human genome also lost out hard :) But, at least now it's getting back on track.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:04 AM
1

So it was a shit strategy for humans after all It's a shit strategy for unattractive male humans, sure. It's a great strategy for humans as a whole. We should have listened to ants Highly irrelevant segue..
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:03 AM
1

I'm a young blonde. I always have attention from the opposite gender. This is also irrelevant. If you want to play gotcha and make me feel sorry for you, it's not gonna work. Put up a real argument, or shut up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:02 AM
1

In this case it would be waiting until they die. Not true. Ancient nomadic hunter/gatherer tribes often encountered each other. Also patriarchal human societies forcing (relatively) monogamous pairings for their male and female populations have almost completely wiped out hunter gatherer societies that follow strange paradigms where they share the women among high value males So? Forced monogamy (aka sexual communism) is best for males, not best for females, or for the species as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 04:00 AM
1

Of course. Most people have.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:59 AM
1

Yes. I have a lot of emotional investment in my family.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:58 AM
2

Plenty of people have done it throughout the history of our species without going crazy from "psychological torture". If that's what I have to put up with then I'd rather (not mentioning it because for some reason it's forbidden here) And that's why women find unknown unattractive men creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:57 AM
1

Also a feature. For an animal that can hypothetically reproduce for a few decades, waiting a relatively small while for a genetically fit mate to come along can be worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:55 AM
2

Many people see a benefit in aiding their family and the family's legacy. Biologically, it benefits their genetic legacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:53 AM
2

That's for them to figure out as individuals, I suppose. But, in terms of evolutionary biology, their purpose is to help their closest sexually successful relatives succeed and reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:51 AM
2

Becoming more attractive is something that a woman can do with proper dieting and such. It's not something a man can do if he already started out with the wrong genetics That's a feature, not a bug. Not all males in a sexually dimorphic species are meant to reproduce, especially in a species where the gestation and maturation of young takes so long. Every female is needed to keep the population growing, but only the most genetically fit males are meant to reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:47 AM
1

Honestly? Not very. Uncontrollable genetic traits are the most important in regards to physical sexual attraction. Heterosexual men and women both have indicators of genetic fitness/virility that they instinctually find attractive. But, desperate people will often settle for what they can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:41 AM
1

If ANYTHING, it's that thing where women bang high-level guys, HOPING they'll stick around. That's not love It's still looking for love and companionship
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:37 AM
1

Female empathy, everybody Having empathy means being able to accurately identify emotions, it doesn't mean I have to want to deal with negative emotions constantly. I'm sure you'd say the same about fat or ugly women Yeah, I don't particularly care to listen to their dating woes, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/17 03:36 AM
1

Yeah, and I don't hate men for that. Either sex hating the other for their reproductive strategy is foolish.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 08:02 PM
1

You can look for companionship and love while also having high standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 08:01 PM
1

Everything else you said is accurate, except this: According to people like her, only the "good" men should be considered "people" Unattractive men are still people and should be given the same rights as other people, obviously. I'd just rather not listen to them complain about natural selection taking its course.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 07:59 PM
1

Not every man can be mentally strong. Men are just people at the end of the day Of course. Everyone has moments of weakness, but consistent weakness, especially when coupled with a "woe is me" attitude, is very unattractive in men. Men who are especially unattractive are just gross to me, same with food I find unappealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/17 07:57 PM
1

I feel for anyone who has a disadvantage in life. But, I have far less patience for low SMV men complaining about their disadvantages than I do for people with more serious problems. Sorry you can't get laid, but you shouldn't be complaining more than a man with ALS or a combat veteran with PTSD. Also, I'll be honest and admit an unconscious disgust for low SMV men and weak men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/17 04:06 PM
7

Most people want to have biological kids of their own, not adopt. There are so many children growing up in foster care as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:26 PM
3

My job is to determine value of products and services. I do this, day in and day out Then you should have a better understanding that women, sex, and marriage ARE NOT PRODUCTS
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:14 PM
9

How many times are we going to make the same arguments over and over? Once a child exists, it needs to be taken care of and paid for. It makes the most logical sense for the biological father to foot half the bill. The only other alternative would be having tax payers pick up the tab, and good luck convincing conservatives to agree to that. The law isn't going to change, stop bitching.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 07:03 PM
3

Market value isn't the highest value that something can obtain I disagree. There is no such thing as "inherent value", value only exists because of demand, and can only be measured by demand. For example, a diamond is just a shiny piece of carbon, it has no "inherent value", the entire value comes from the market. A dollar bill is just a piece of green paper, but it has value because enough people believe it does. That woman believes that she is inherently valuable enough to be owed a marriage, …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 06:54 PM
3

you, and a lot of women out there, appear to overvalue yourselves "Value" is set by the market. If there are still men willing to get married, then women are not overvaluing themselves, by definition of the word.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 05:33 PM
2

Lol, that's not real acceptance. There's no genuine attraction, no genuine desire. The whole time the prostitute is probably trying not to throw up while counting the minutes until it's over. Only fools think sex with prostitutes counts as actual validation and social/sexual acceptance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 05:07 PM
1

they'd probably be happy with one who is just not overweight And when the average woman is overweight, that is a very high standard for an average man to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 04:14 PM
1

It's only limiting if you feel that inherent female instincts are somehow bad or shameful. I don't feel limited by the knowledge of "all women are like that" any more than I feel limited by the knowledge of "all humans are like that". Our natures exist in their current state for a reason, they have been beneficial to our survival for millions of years. And, in the end, survival is all that matters. Don't feel limited by your nature, feel empowered. Choose to cultivate the traits that best serve …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 04:02 PM
1

Not exactly sexy in the "I want to rip his clothes off" way, but altruism from a place of status/power does create warm fuzzy excitement and butterflies-in-the-stomach type feelings. It makes me more likely to see the man as a good potential father and partner, sometimes it's sexy enough for me to think "I want his babies", especially if it's altruism toward children or animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 03:53 PM
2

The male sex instinctually needs to fuck or else it feels like a failure and rejected by its species But, if no one in the entire species wants to reproduce with you, then by definition you are rejected by the species. It means the species does not need or want your genetics in the gene pool. Why should we shield men from this obvious truth? Isn't the red pill all about revealing uncomfortable truths?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/17 03:48 PM
1

Ok, so why do you find the modern state of humanity so much less appealing than any other period of time?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 08:29 PM
1

Ok, so why do you find the modern state of humanity so much less appealing than any other period of time?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 08:29 PM
1

And some of them just fail to be selected by females. Why would animals that mate for life be LESS selective? That makes no evolutionary sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 08:18 PM
1

There would be no heterosexual sex in the world you're describing. Women would opt out or indulge in bicuriosity
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 08:16 PM
1

How can you hate something that allowed your existence to eventually occur? Do you not value your existence? Human nature might not be pretty, but none of us would be here without it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 08:14 PM
2

If women do end up settling, then the entire premise of your OP is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/17 07:55 PM
1

A lot of women would rather die than be raped. It's just an innate visceral fear. How many men would rather die than have their genitals cut off?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 03:38 AM
1

I've always assumed this to be true. Rape is basically cuckolding a female, coupled with the emotional and physical trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 03:33 AM
1

To most animals size = strength. The tiger doesn't need to know what you can bench if you look intimidating enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 03:31 AM
1

Can I choose a hybrid House? I'd probably be a slytherpuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/17 03:21 AM
1

K.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 11:03 PM
1

From my experience, natural alphas like to talk shit, but they don't actually mean it when they call women "bitches and hoes". "Omega" males on the other hand really mean it from the bottom of their hateful little hearts that women are evil and disposable. The worst thing a natural alpha will do to a woman is not return her texts after having a one night stand. "Omega" males literally want to take away women's rights and lives for the crime of not having sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 10:58 PM
2

Mostly. They're not the ones writing misogynistic manifestos online or going on shooting sprees against women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 10:46 PM
1

No, I think all men tend to have an innate "women are wonderful" bias. But, natural alphas are more likely to maintain that bias throughout their lives instead of becoming jaded. And, an individual woman is much better off dating a man who has never had reason to hate women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 10:44 PM
1

They tend to maintain the pro-female bias more often and for longer than unattractive men. They're treated well by women in general and have sexual success, so they have no reason to see women as an evil "other" that's constantly working against their desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 10:38 PM
2

"Women seem wicked when you're unwanted" basically sums it up. I think most men are born with a "women are wonderful" bias, and then the unattractive/unsuccessful men lose it and replace it with a "women are wicked" bias after enough time of feeling scorned. TRP exacerbates this anti-female bias, even after its members claim to find romantic/sexual success. Why would any woman want to be with a man who resents her? Especially a man who had to work on becoming attractive in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 10:32 PM
1

No, we want natural alphas with an intact unconscious "women are wonderful" bias. TRP builds "better betas" (aka fake alphas) with misogynistic/self-serving "team-man" attitudes, so basically the exact opposite of what most women want.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 09:32 PM
1

It comes down to maintaining a public image of having "their" women under control.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 09:25 PM
4

K. I'm sure your brain works completely differently from the rest of humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 06:21 PM
1

Our hindbrain doesn't care about "right now"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 05:46 PM
1

Because they take 9 months to replace.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 05:22 PM
3

Honor killings have nothing to do with morality, they're all about maintaining public image in a fucked up misogynistic culture. Morality is just used as a convenient excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 04:45 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 04:44 PM
1

True. But, empathetic people are more likely to be moral. People with no empathy are psychopaths and extreme autists.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 04:41 PM
2

You can be empathetic and still be a horrible person Uh, I don't think that's how that works. Truly empathetic people try to limit the pain of others, because doing so limits their own pain. When an empathetic person sees someone crying, they also feel like crying. Because there are some moral rules that are advantageous for societies. "Don't kill others" makes sense for example, if everyone was killing each other, society wouldn't survive. Exactly my point. I don't think these moral rules just …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 04:31 PM
2

Humans are empathetic and cooperative deep down, but this is not the same as morality How do you differentiate between the two? And if morality comes from religion and society, then why would there be any similarities between the moral rules of societies continents apart?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 04:21 PM
3

Morality is an adaptation to facilitate cohesive social groups. It's an inborn sense of altruism and fairness. People like to think morality comes from religion or society, but those are just reflections of our inner conscience. Ever wonder why almost all religions and societies share the same basic tenants of morality? Don't kill and don't steal are pretty much universal rules whenever people form tribes/societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 04:11 PM
1

Only if you're also hot
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 04:35 AM
6

Rape fantasy aka "ravishment" implies desire and consent, while rape implies no consent. So, they're very different concepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 02:22 AM
2

Just as? Why haven't there been women that want to go empire really? Queen Elizabeth and Queen Victoria of England, Catherine the Great of Russia, Zenobia of Syria, Empress Wu Zetian of China, etc were all famous for their military ambitions and conquests. To me, men are more brave, not dumber as you're implying lol. Men are more willing to die for their ambition Which can be very, very dumb if not thought out properly. Bravery and foolishness are two sides of the same coin, a brave man is just …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 02:08 AM
2

for the same reason they more often have grand ambition Women can be just as ambitious as men, but they usually temper their ambition with calculated caution, while men are more prone to taking foolish risks. Do you have any feelings about words like glory? I think it's a bullshit idea made up by people in power and used to motivate cannon fodder soldiers to sacrifice themselves throughout history. There is no such thing as a "glorious death", there is only death. When I think of "legitimate" gl…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/17 01:26 AM
1

Because not all men share these same feelings, so they're not actually innate to hetero men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 11:18 PM
1

Because it holds us back, fails us, makes us do what we otherwise wouldn't, etc That's just part of the human condition. You have to take the bad with the good to be human. Without our human foibles, we'd be like boring robots. Women just don't really worry or think about these things typically in the way men do Because there's literally no point in worrying about those things. You're going to make mistakes in life, and you won't live forever. Those are just unchangeable facts, so why agonize ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 10:07 PM
1

How sad. Why hate your base animal self? That's like hating your own skeleton. We need those instincts to support our more "human" side. Maybe it's easier for women to appreciate our animal nature, because we don't have instincts telling us to rape and murder?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/17 04:58 PM
1

<3 all your weird thoughts
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 02:10 AM
1

Yeah, the law should absolutely be gender-neutral in application.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 01:23 AM
2

taints a women in the eyes of many men Yeah, they have feelings and opinions toward it. Like I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 01:19 AM
1

And women have contributed nothing for science and technology throughout history compared to men, does that make them stupid, lazy, and incompetent? No. Science and technology are not the only fields of importance in human history. Women contributed to plenty of other fields, even before the invention of agriculture and modern society. Much of our fundamental medical and culinary knowledge can be attributed to our early female ancestors, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 01:17 AM
1

The argument that a natural biological process "taints" anyone is entirely based on feelings and opinions. Puritans also used to believe that masturbation would permanently "taint" anyone who did it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 01:14 AM
3

How much do you need? Evidence of a pattern of behavior present over MANY multiple generations. Men have statistically committed more violent crimes for thousands of years, blacks have not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 01:12 AM
1

Opinions all around
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 01:06 AM
2

Single woman, here. I would only ever accept a pre-nup if my fiance we a literal multi-millionaire/billionaire.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 12:57 AM
1

even after they see women slut around because they've convinced themselves that being promiscuous doesn't "taint" a woman Sex does not "taint" anyone, man or woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 12:49 AM
1

Why can't we accept blacks do worse on IQ tests adjusted for income? Because countless studies have shown that there is no biological or genetic basis for those claims, therefor culture and class are to blame. Current income does not account for developmental factors that affect IQ, like childhood nutrition. Because profiling is wrong, whether it's gender or race One has more logical merit than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 12:44 AM
2

You've written my response better than I could have. Wish I could upvote more than once!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 12:41 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 12:35 AM
1

even if it is true, it's still unfair and damaging to treat men like they are all sexual predators I agree with that. There's having a healthy amount of caution around strange men, and then there's jumping to conclusions. Keeping a watchful eye on an odd-looking man in a children's playground is normal, immediately calling the cops with no evidence of wrong-doing is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/17 12:34 AM
2

I don't think women are actually more moral, I just think their immorality manifests differently from men's. It's less aggressive and external But aren't violent/aggressive and external forms of immorality objectively worse?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 11:33 PM
1

The statistics ignore the obvious economic and cultural factors. We have no problem acknowledging that male and female gorillas naturally behave differently, males are clearly more aggressive than their female counterparts. So, why can't we accept that men and women are generally different, with men being more prone to violence and sexual misconduct?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 11:25 PM
1

Race is literally only skin deep, sex hormones affect the way the brain works. Select two random men from the population at large, they are going to have more instincts and innate behaviors in common with each other than two random black people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 11:22 PM
2

Diabetes, Crohn's, and asthma also have real effects on a relationship, but I don't see you railing against those health problems. It is all about feelings, I'm guessing you had a bad experience with a mentally ill partner and now you're biased against them. But it's no more logical than if I had a bad experience with a guy with back problems and decided that all men with back problems make bad partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 05:05 PM
3

Once again, I think you're just projecting your own feelings about the mentally ill onto other men. Regardless, there are plenty of attractive men on anti depressants or the like who don't judge others for taking medication. They would absolutely choose the 8 over the 6 for both sex and relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 04:18 PM
2

Same!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 12:25 AM
1

Your score is 30 out of 36. Your score is equal or better than 82% of all participants. I guess that's a good score. This was a fun test! The old people were the most difficult, because of the wrinkles.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/17 12:24 AM
1

Firstly, the only way to "fix" their celibacy would be to force women to have sex with them. Secondly, obstructing sexual selection would result in more genetically unfortunate individuals being born, causing more suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 10:09 PM
5

In what world are those two people romantically equal? Mental disorders do not affect rmv NEARLY as much as you think. You're taking your own preferences/prejudices and projecting them onto other men. In a world where most women take psychiatric medication, do you really think a man is going to choose a 6 who's never seen a therapist over an 8 with well managed mental illness?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 09:47 PM
9

It's as ridiculous as saying people with asthma or diabetes or crohn's make worse partners. People aren't custom order robots, everyone has baggage.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 09:41 PM
1

Yes. Naturals are more likely to pass beneficial genetic traits onto potential offspring. This is a no-brainer.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 06:04 PM
1

"Superficial" traits are proxies for genetic fitness. What we innately find physically appealing are fairly reliable indicators of health and virility, namely: muscularity, height, and facial symmetry (with facial characteristics that are linked to high levels of testosterone). Social status is also a good proxy for "character", as it takes someone with naturally high levels of ambition, cunning, and perseverance to climb to the top of a social hierarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 05:45 PM
1

It's not about judging character, it's about judging genetic fitness. Women are great at judging that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 04:40 PM
1

Yes, I'm ok with that. "Helping" incels in the short term would cause more harm in the long term. It's the same reason I care more about climate change than I do about keeping coal miners employed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 04:36 PM
1

You talk about women's natural instincts as if they're malicious and without purpose. Sexual selection is the force which keeps a species moving forward genetically.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 01:12 AM
4

Women instinctively value freedom, because without it we cannot practice our most important natural role as sexual selectors and regulators of the gene pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 09:35 PM
1

Hope is definitely more powerful. Without delusional levels of hope, humanity would have never left Africa to populate every corner of the globe. Hope beyond reason keeps us fighting the odds, instead of laying down to die. It's one of our most important adaptations for survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 09:33 PM
0

23, purple. I like things that benefit me. I'm only human, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 09:00 PM
2

Hope springs eternal in the human heart (unless that human is an incel)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 08:46 PM
-1

Why do gamblers keep pulling at the slot machine, even though they lose money most of the time? Because, they're hoping that "this time will be different" and they'll land the jackpot.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/17 04:36 PM
1

Women throughout history have been property of men Not in all societies, and not before the creation of agriculture, property, and inheritance. If we're going to take a genetic or natural deterministic point of view, women's taste in men are irrelevant in humans Nah, we've been subject to sexual selection for the vast majority of our evolutionary timeline. Written history is a fraction of our evolutionary history.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 05:55 AM
1

Inb4 this thread has a bunch of opinions regarding her appearance. Because, woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 04:10 AM
1

Male genes matter more in mammals than female genes, because mutations from the father are more likely to be expressed in offspring. And since males can potentially have hundreds if not thousands of offspring, their genes (good and bad) can spread through the population at a faster rate. If this was really about natural eugenics, just as many women would be overlooked as men There is literally no species of animal in existence that practices your made up form of equal opportunity eugenics. Males…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 04:06 AM
1

The first guy is pretty cute (when he has a beard), but the second one is not remotely to attractive in my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/17 03:14 AM
1

A beautiful, beautiful Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 03:10 PM
1

High pitched voice is an immediate deal breaker, because it destroys any sexual attraction. Southern or western accents are a deal breaker as well. They just make the speaker sound like an idiot country bumpkin, and my hypergamy requires a man more intelligent than myself. I love "high class" English accents, they drive me wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 03:05 PM
1

I love Critikal. I could listen to him read the fucking dictionary
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 03:02 PM
3

The sex that regulates gene pool quality cares more about genetic traits? Well color me shocked. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 03:01 PM
1

Why couldn't play-sparring do the same thing? In animals, play behaviors exist so that the young can practice skills they'll need later in life. Do children really need to be tormented to become adults? Won't life's eventual hardships temper them later on, anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 12:21 AM
2

I've never actually read a positive description of hell however? That's probably because all of the descriptions we have of "hell" are given to us by followers of Yahweh. In other earlier religions, the afterlife/underworld definitely isn't a horrible place of torture. Why even call it hell if it's not terrible? The world "hell" comes from the name of the Germanic goddess of the underworld "Hel" How do we know living on earth isn't actually hell? Because this place has lots of pleasures to enjoy…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 12:16 AM
4

He's basically the biblical version of Prometheus, he gave "light" (knowledge) to humanity against God's wishes, and is punished eternally because of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 12:11 AM
1

Not Luciferian I can tell you its Church of Satan which is inspired by Ayn Rand and American Libertarianism Ah. That's funny, I agree completely with core Satanist beliefs, but I highly dislike Rand and Libertarianism. so feminine. I'm guessing you're outright anti-bullying too then Of course. I am actually ok with "play fighting/wrestling" among kids, but no continuously antagonistic behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 12:09 AM
3

Yahweh desired us to be slaves to him, and for women to be slaves to their husbands. There's no equality there, it's just slavery all the way down. Pretty much guarantees being condemned while not enjoying the evil life appropriately. LOL. That's only if you believe the propaganda that hell is a horrible place to be feared. What if hell is the real heaven, and heaven the real hell? What if hell is filled with all the "sinful" delights of the physical world, while heaven is a dreadfully boring re…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 12:03 AM
3

Lucifer is the real protagonist of the bible and his rules actually make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/17 12:00 AM
1

I don't think that last part is pure Crowely It's Crowely mixed with some Luciferianism, I believe I'm not convinced that guns and tanks are the only way to harm people. Thats a very feminine way to look at things are you a female? Yep, I am. I think physical harm is the worst kind of harm, and the most easily preventable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 11:52 PM
3

Panty dropper alert (Ian Somerhaulder) Those abs, that leather jacket, that smirk, that hair... Here's another picture of him that's NSFW He has the chiseled ass and jawline of a god. Plus that wink... One more picture of him for good measure I think I might be the only lady in this thread who has a more "masculine" brain when it comes to attraction and arousal. Just looking at those pictures gets me revved up, and I'm attracted to literally every character this actor plays. Although, I'm defini…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 11:48 PM
1

Imo individual freedom is gained by asserting yourself and taking it Are you a man? This sounds very masculine, and unrealistic if you're a woman. We do not possess the physical strength to just "take" whatever we want with direct force. Okay so then the question becomes do you believe in the social contract or not? I believe in "do what thou whilt, but harm none" Hitler wanted genocide, which obviously harms a lot of people. But, if he wanted to dress in clown makeup and paint still-life, that …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 11:37 PM
1

I think we should promote individual freedom, but from what I can garner from your comments, you don't approve of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 11:26 PM
1

We're on the internet, weird facts galore
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:42 PM
2

Lmao, love it. We definitely should have named the brontosaurus penisaurus instead
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:27 PM
1

Now you're saying tall guys would've been killed because they can't hide in and stalk through the grass Being able to intimidate a predator > being able to hide from a predator. Especially when it comes to animals who live in social groups. A solitary animal would be better off hiding, but an animal that needs to defend others cannot hide or run. Having one large male in a group could protect the entire group from predation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:20 PM
2

if we go by that logic then short women should be considered unattractive. Regardless of male or female, the shortness signifies an unattractive trait Your logic is flawed, because males and females find different traits unattractive. A male lion doesn't reject a lioness because she can't grow a mane, lol. But if animals can do that, then we also can't blame and demonize humans doing the same Rape has never been our primary method of reproduction, as evidenced by our own anatomy. If it were, fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 05:18 PM
1

Says who? Is that the average height for grassland plants in eastern Africa? Also, you failed to answer my questions. Would an early hominid be better off if predators could sneak up on him? Would an early hominid be better off if predators saw him as an easy kill? Would an early hominid be better off if males from rival groups saw him as an easy target?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:52 PM
1

Nice hyperbole. When did I ever mention 10 feet? I said taller than tall grasses. Do you think an early hominid would be better off NOT seeing potential predators coming? And also NOT being able to intimidate the predator by virtue of size?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:47 PM
1

You don't believe in natural selection and evolution? Why would a species consistently select against a trait if that trait weren't detrimental to survival?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:43 PM
1

You don't think being tall enough to see over the savanna grass and see predators coming was ever an advantage for hominids? That's like saying being bipedal was never an advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:41 PM
5

The behavioral observations RP makes are often valid, but the conclusions they draw are mostly extreme and misogynistic. Men and women are biologically different, have differently wired brains, different amounts of hormones in their bodies, and different reproductive instincts. However, that does not mean one sex is superior to the other, or that we should force societal roles based on gender onto individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:39 PM
1

I still feel like it's more of a gamble than anything Sexual reproduction IS a gamble. Asexual reproduction is technically the most stable form of reproduction, it guarantees offspring share the exact same DNA as the parent. In sexual reproduction, both parents genes are essentially thrown into a biological blender, increasing the chance for mutations or genetic anomalies. Each time we reproduce sexually, it's rolling the genetic die and hoping for beneficial results. trying to validate why we a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:33 PM
1

There are studies which argue that the father's genes are more likely to be expressed in offspring than the mother's. So, the father's height might be more important than the mother's, thus vindicating all short women who pursue tall men and all unattractive women who pursue attractive men. The gene pool is still improving, but it doesn't happen all at once in one generation (or even ten generations).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/17 04:06 PM
3

Because a guy pushed to his personal max.... is probably better than 90% of the other schlubs out there, who don't seek to maximise what they build and just kinda rub by That's true. Having a cool haircut and abs puts any guy above 70% of the crowd. We all build it different ways, but the end result is just as real no matter which way you build it I like this a lot. Very well put.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 11:17 PM
1

Can confirm: come from a family of musicians. I also sing, write and do digital art.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 11:14 PM
1

It just seems to me that some people are born with higher social sensitivity, so they learn social skills faster.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 10:49 PM
3

They don't set our results They set your potential and where your ceiling for improvement is. builds real, honest to god, muscles womens instincts key off. They're not fake. They're real muscles Agreed. A lot of TRP is about living up to your own biological potential, which I wholeheartedly support. NO-ONE is born and comes out of the vagina charming There are some manipulative and charming toddlers out there, so I'm gonna have to disagree. Some people are just born with higher emotional intelli…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 10:39 PM
2

Lol, since when are starving artists, small-time writers, garage banders, and choir singers high status?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 10:21 PM
4

No, but it could still satisfy a slight itch for new pussy. This is also why I fully support role playing and dressing up in the bedroom, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 10:11 PM
1

Either you are attracted or you're not Agreed. But attraction varies in intensity, at least for women. There's the "he's hot, I'd probably fuck him" level and then there's "Oh my god, I want his babies!!" Lol, are you saying that professional weight lifters make you wet? No, I'm not into jocks. I like musicians and artists. Also, the most talented jock wouldn't be a professional weight lifter, they'd be an Olympic athlete.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 10:10 PM
3

How can you "build a better male" when it all comes down to genetics? TRP is still all about faking and pretending to have better genes than you actually have.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 10:03 PM
3

As I said, physical looks is all there is to it, stop glorifying the vagina Lmao, all glory to the vagina! Physical looks are necessary to get in the door, other attractive non-physical qualities seal the deal. This isn't an "either, or" argument. Also, dumb jocks are dumb and untalendpted Jocks are definitely talented at sports
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 10:01 PM
1

If a man wants novelty, he can buy his woman new lingerie or request she does her hair differently once in a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:58 PM
2

Does this dispel the idea men see prostitutes out of desperation? No. Does this say anything about ugly, deformed or men seeing hookers because they can't get laid otherwise? No. Why would a man like this see hookers? He has a particular fetish or something that his girlfriend won't provide. And he's too unattractive to find a real sex partner to cheat with.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:56 PM
3

Well, it highly depends on what the skills are. Women don't give a shit if you're the best at League of Legends, but they definitely care if you're a talented musician or surgeon. I have seen basically retarded barely functional guys who slayed puss Because they were otherwise physically attractive, I'd bet. Always assume when I (or pretty much any person) discuss an attractive quality in a mate, I'm imagining that quality on someone I'm already physically into.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:53 PM
3

Lol, stop telling women what they find attractive! No woman finds a lack of talent sexy. Even Napoleon Dynamite knew "girls like guys who have skills" :P Talent is absolutely sexy, because we like to imagine the man was born with it, and that he'll pass his talent on to our future babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:47 PM
2

If he likes fucking other guys, that's hot. But, if he's on the bottom then I'm definitely turned off. Bisexuality isn't an immediate dealbreaker for me. However, I think it would probably make me feel less secure with the relationship in the long run. I'd worry more about cheating, mainly because finding men who are down to have casual sex is far too easy, especially in the gay community.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:44 PM
3

They are signalling I've got good genes, I've got good genes in a way that is impossible to fake We (women) seem to care most about genetic traits that are impossible to fake, which makes sense if the goal is the give our offspring as many genetic advantages as possible. I think this is also why talent is so attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:36 PM
2

But a tall man with broad shoulders, a handsome face, social status, AND wit is ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/17 09:33 PM
3

Feminism turned my frog gay
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 10:40 PM
1

Female, purple. Previous shortest time: A few hours of a date on top of a week or two of texting Current SO: The first time I met him we were at a party and we just made out a lot. Then we texted for a couple months, and the next time another party rolled around, I went back to his place afterward and we did the deed. I don't think he'd give a shit if he learned this, he's a sex positive feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 10:27 PM
1

Inciting hatred by sharing my romantic preferences anonymously on an internet forum?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 10:21 PM
1

You want to be the victim so badly, don't you? Refusing to be romantic with someone based on a decision they made is not bigoted, it's normal screening.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 08:26 PM
1

They are icky to me, personally. And to many other women. I would never call them icky to their faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 02:29 PM
1

Gay boys are born with the inclination to be sexually attracted to other men. The desire to suck cock was always there, but doesn't emerge until puberty or so. I don't know why you're so invested in how women view men who pay for sex. If you want to fuck prostitutes, just lie about it. But, you'll never convince the majority of women to be ok with dating Johns.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 02:28 PM
1

If youre tall with an ugly face its OVER as a male Untrue. There are plenty of ugly or big girls who would love to snag a tall guy, and they probably wouldn't be picky when it comes to face. However, if you're trying to go after attractive, highly sought after women, you're gonna have a bad time.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 12:21 AM
2

How do you know they're looking at you like you're a neckbeard? Do they look at you with disgust? Being 6'4, you've already got a really attractive trait going for you. I doubt they think you're hideous. Do you smile while in public or are you mostly straight-faced?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 12:08 AM
4

Hm..I guess it depends on what sort of women you're into. I'm attracted to tall, handsome nerd-looking dudes, regardless of skin color, but that's just me. I can imagine how frustrating and lonely it must be to have people fear you for no reason, but would you honestly rather have people disrespect and walk all over you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/17 12:01 AM
7

As a person with social anxiety, I fucking love Boston. No unnecessary surprise social interactions, it's heavenly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:59 PM
5

Change your facial expressions and your style of dress. Unfortunately, western culture has spread an image of "dangerous black male" which includes "gangster" style clothing. Try to dress as much like a harmless milquetoast white dude as you can.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:57 PM
5

No one says women and men are exactly the same. There are obvious biological differences. Sorry the instincts which kept our ancestors alive are currently inconveniencing you. Do something to look more approachable and less frightening.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:55 PM
0

Millions of years of rape and violence? The physically weaker sex has needed to be more "paranoid" to survive. Cave-women who weren't afraid of strange men didn't pass on their genes, it's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:52 PM
1

Oooooh, my genes determine how much of a fuckboy I am? How much of a fuckboy you're capable of being, yes. All men would be fuckboys, if they were good looking enough to be. The men who aren't attractive enough have to "buy" sex. it isn't the primary reason or what they most look forward to That isn't what women primarily look forward to, either. Only porn stars "orgasm" from giving blowjobs, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:50 PM
2

Unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:42 PM
1

I disagree, it is male instinct to want to trade what you have for her sex Desperate unattractive male instinct. Males with good genes trade sex for sex, not resources. The idea that men want to pleasure women as part of their innate male sexuality is female projection Rofl. As a straight woman, I'm so glad that's untrue. Plenty of men get off on making their partner feel good, they get an ego boost from causing their partner to orgasm. Also, you never answered this question: is it hateful or di…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:39 PM
2

They were not born viewing sex as a transaction. Comparing the desire to pay for sex to legitimate inborn sexual orientations is a joke. Regardless, is it hateful or discriminatory for a straight man to refuse to date a gay man?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:31 PM
1

Nah
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:17 PM
3

The good news is: people can have whatever preferences/requirements they want for romantic partners, so long as they have options :) I haven't had trouble finding men who have never paid for sex, men who would probably laugh at the very idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:10 PM
3

There is a HUGE emotional difference between the two. In a one night stand BOTH partners are attracted to each other and enthusiastic about having sex. A man who buys sex is equivalent to a woman who sells sex, he is not the equivalent of someone who can find sex for free. Don't blame feminism for biology. The majority of women always have and always will find whoremongers unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 11:04 PM
1

Ok, whatever makes you FEEL better.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 10:58 PM
1

Not in most liberal areas
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 10:57 PM
3

Starvation has killed far more people than virginity. Sex is not a need. Regardless, I still don't want to be with a man who thinks sex is a commodity that can be purchased.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 10:57 PM
1

Assuming that you need at least a modestly impressive number like 40 to hit that mark According to many red pillers, a woman having any amount casual sex is riding the "cock carousel", so an N count of 40 is not necessary to enjoy the "pussy parade". Ergo, for 85-90% of men, the moderately active sex life indicated by "cock carousel" can only happen through prostitutes Then I want nothing to do with most men. YMMV, but if you start saying 15 or 20 qualifies I'll have to laugh in your face Both t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 10:55 PM
2

Not wanting to fuck/date someone is not hateful or discriminatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 10:53 PM
1

That's why I've always preferred DC. I want my SUPER heroes to actually have SUPER powers. I'm sick of stories about rich white dudes who just buy their hero status. I like my heroes to have been born special or mutated through some sort of incident, no wannabes without powers pls. Maybe it's my hypergamy talking :P
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 07:17 PM
4

One views sex as a mutually enjoyable activity, the other views sex as a transaction. I can respect people regardless of their attitude toward sex, but I would never date someone who thinks sex is a commodity to be bought.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 07:01 PM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 06:38 PM
1

Idealism vs realism
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 06:12 PM
1

You're right, it is a very valid example of toxic masculinity. It implies a "real man" owns his woman, and if you're not adequately controlling your woman (and living up to a masculine caricature) then you're a "cuck".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 06:08 PM
2

Well, a lot of losers who use the word refuse to admit it, so it's nice to finally hear from the horse's mouth. Basically, boys can't make fun of gay people anymore, but they still want a way to emasculate each other. So they use the word "cuck" in totally inappropriate contexts and sap all actual meaning from the word. A cuckold is a man whose wife is sleeping with other men and makes him raise her bastard kids, nothing more, nothing less.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 06:06 PM
1

So you're admitting it's just gen z's version of the f word?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 06:03 PM
2

is very deserving of being called a cuck, even if there is no bull around So basically the word "cuckold" has lost all meaning. Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 06:02 PM
1

Men who sleep with prostitutes come from all walks of life, including those who need to pay to get pussy and those who don't I highly disagree. And even if it were true, it wouldn't change how I (or most other women) view men who sleep with whores.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 06:01 PM
3

Except societal changes HAVE successfully changed the average man's view of sluttiness, so there's clearly not an inborn distaste for promiscuity. I do feel women's distaste for a lack of "social proof"/"pre-selection" is inborn, it's a way to separate men with good genes from men with bad genes. Regardless, I'd tell sluts the same thing, just lie about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 05:56 PM
2

I'd still say it's true for the majority of men who sleep with sex workers. Celebrities are outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 05:55 PM
3

You can rationalize all you want, it still won't change how women feel about it. If you want to see prostitutes so badly without facing any consequences for it, then just lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 05:54 PM
3

It all ties together to explain why women don't want to be with men who pay for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 05:52 PM
3

Versus whatever it costs in money or effort to get laid 'properly' which the man might not feel is worth it The man doesn't feel it's "worth it" to have sexual partners who actually desire sex with him, so it's still gross. The kind of men who view sex as a transaction and not as a mutually pleasurable activity are icky, regardless of status or wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 05:48 PM
2

Doesn't matter, she can still find people who genuinely find her arousing. A man who sees prostitutes likely can't get sex OR commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 05:46 PM
2

Why aren't any of them actually attractive? Let women choose the pics next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 04:41 PM
2

Most at least fake it, but seeing a prostitute is basically an outright admission of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 03:57 PM
7

wealthy, busy men will do this for convenience More like laziness, either way it creates an ick factor because it implies the man doesn't care about whether the women he fucks actually desire him.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 03:54 PM
5

The male version of the cock carousel LOL, no. The male version of the cock carousel is the pussy parade, but most men aren't attractive enough to gain entry. Seeing a prostitute is admitting defeat, admitting to the world and to yourself that you're not good enough to obtain real enthusiastic sex with a partner who genuinely desires you. A woman on the CC may be having uncommitted sex with strangers more attractive than she is, but at least she can still inspire real arousal, without paying for…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 03:52 PM
5

A woman who rides the CC = a man who participates in the pussy parade A man who buys sex = a woman who sells sex Men who use prostitutes are as unattractive to women as sex workers are to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 03:40 PM
3

Sex with a partner who actually desires you is very different from intercourse that you had to pay for. And unless a woman has visited prostitutes in the past, there is no hypocrisy. BP doesn't judge male virgins who prefer female virgins, they judge man whores who talk shit about sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/17 03:36 PM
2

It's just chemistry, baby. When your immune systems are so compatible your body basically screams "this one! Make babies with this one!" It feels like an instant connection, like you found someone on the same wavelength and frequency that you've always vibed at. You feel like you've "known" this person for a long time, even though you just met. You "get" each other, there's no need to put on a mask or pretend to be someone else, because your weirdly shaped puzzle piece fits just perfectly with t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/17 04:33 PM
5

The same reason male deer accept female deer even though they never had to put effort into growing horns and butting heads. Males are the ones that compete to impress the opposite sex, females are the selectors. However, women WILL work hard to KEEP the attention of an especially attractive man, or at least a man significantly more attractive than she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/17 04:18 PM
1

The gang member probably has better genetics, is more capable of surviving and defending what's his, and will pass all of that on to all his children.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/17 04:00 PM
1

An ugly face or unattractive body proportions would be even more accurate comparisons. They're genetic and more likely to be deal breakers than butt or breast size. Either way, whether or not a trait can be changed is irrelevant to attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/17 03:19 PM
2

The media forced the image of the "ideal woman" down my throat pretty early on, so I knew that appearance was the most important factor in snagging a man. Everything else was trial and error, with the vague warning of "boys only want one thing" hanging over my head.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/17 03:54 PM
3

Absolutely, they're by far the sexiest monster. I also would want to be one, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/17 02:04 AM
5

It ain't no lie baby, bye bye bye
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 10:18 PM
1

Women, don't you think that is hypocrite? Nope, men and women want different things. Women are highly attracted to confidence/strength and turned off by weakness/insecurity. A weak man wouldn't be as able to protect his mate or his children, so it makes sense for women to select against that. Also, insecure men remind women of children, and that kills all attraction. Men have never needed their mate to protect them, so they have different attraction ques than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 09:55 PM
6

No. I've tried being with a small guy before, found it very unsatisfying, and would not go for it again. I also wouldn't want to be with someone with a giant dick, but I'd still be more willing to make that work. 5.5 to 7 inches is the sweet spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 09:35 PM
2

It makes sense for you to deny this reality, since you have a horse in the race.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 05:19 PM
4

They often are when it comes to attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 02:26 PM
7

No. Men, would you date a fat woman if she wore a corset out in public?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/17 01:27 AM
0

Gene survival is less important than actual survival. Your genes cannot survive if you don't live long enough to reproduce. Anyway, if something is natural and doesn't directly physically harm anyone, I consider it good.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 12:36 AM
6

In the history of our species, one sex predominantly competed against others of their sex to reproduce, so they had no need to evolve an in-group bias. The other sex was physically weak and vulnerable as individuals, but strong when united. I don't see why this would be a bad reflection upon women, women are just more likely to defend their own. It's a mechanism for survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 12:12 AM
2

I'm ok with being an oddball.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/17 12:07 AM
2

Either they married someone they weren't attracted to, or they faced a daily struggle to survive. That's not much of a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:35 PM
2

Do you really think your social darwinistic ideas about sexual attraction would be received that well by most people? Probably not. But, they'd be better received than racist or misogynistic ideas. And, I've definitely seen people say worse shit than I have, on twitter alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:33 PM
2

It's happened many times in American history And we always bounced back and returned to our roots, that makes me more confident in our democracy. Curious: would you say the things you do on ppd without internet anonymity? Absolutely. I don't think I've said anything so horrible that I wouldn't put it on twitter or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:29 PM
1

A guy has to either step up to beta bucks/LTR one of those, and give them whatever they want- or resort to casual sex in the fat acceptance camp Exactly. Why is this bad for women, again?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:23 PM
1

Women desire talent and status like men desire youth and fertility. It is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:20 PM
1

The fact that a thing is bad doesn't mean the converse of that thing is "good". In this particular circumstance, it does. It's a bigger risk, but for a bigger potential reward.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:19 PM
1

The fact that Bob is left out doesn't mean hookup is good for women Yes it does. Anything that keeps women from being forced to have sex with men they're not attracted to is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:08 PM
3

I got asked out (by an attractive guy) while in my first relationship (with a very unattractive guy), and I said yes without really thinking about it. I realized I needed a sexual spark in my relationship, so I immediately called up that boyfriend and broke up with him. But, the attractive guy ended up being my first pump and dump, so in the end karma got me back.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:04 PM
2

Same!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 07:00 PM
2

Why do you sound so surprised that the sex which competes for romantic attention has to prove themselves more?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:57 PM
1

Singers, guitar/bass players, piano players, artists, creative writers, and men who are good with animals all make me hot under the collar. I go crazy when my current guy is on stage playing bass; not only are his long fingers on the strings sexy, but he has the stage moves and eye-fucking mastered.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:56 PM
1

Asking why the holocaust is bad isn't anymore shitty of a question than asking why the creation of Israel is good. Sure, if you're a child who has never heard the word holocaust before. your social advantage is not one that all members of your society share And is my social advantage not having opinions that would cause my family/friends/coworkers to "condemn" me? That's too funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:53 PM
0

Like did you forget Republicans being targeted by government programs unlawfully under Obama? I remember. Nothing actually happened, so I don't really give a shit. But sure, we all trust Trump plenty I don't trust Trump, I trust democracy. He will be impeached soon enough, further proof that the system still works.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:48 PM
1

Am I the paranoid one? Or is America still full of idiots who can vote. Porque no los dos? This is your non-anonymous Internet. When the government wants to use surveillance for political opposition, then what? Then that'd be illegal and fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:34 PM
1

Everyone's opinion is shitty to someone Sure, but the level of shittiness varies. I've been condemned for my neutral opinion plenty. All my life really. Even asking questions alone! Well, some neutral opinions can be shitty. Some questions can be shitty, like: "why was the holocaust bad?" Haha, 'check your privilege' feels entirely relevant here For not having opinions that would cause my family/friends/coworkers to "condemn" me?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:33 PM
1

ruined people's lives for their opinion If having other people know your honest opinions causes them to dislike you, maybe they're shitty opinions to begin with? Please because you don't care about anonymity, post your picture, address, email address I would, if everyone else were forced to do so as well. It would obviously be dangerous for me to reveal my identity within a forum where other people get to wear masks. Because, as I said before, masks make people into monsters. However, if everyon…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:22 PM
0

Freedom of speech guarantees the right to expression without retaliation FROM THE GOVERNMENT only, not from your neighbors, potential employers, potential romantic partners, or friends. Submit to your benevolent dictator. What could go wrong. What dictator? This is an extremely irrational leap in logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:17 PM
1

What if we got to a point where publicly criticizing trump seriously hurt employment options? I don't see how that could happen. The ability to criticize the government doesn't just disappear if anonymity disappears. The country and the bill of rights are over 200 years old, we've only had internet anonymity for less than 30. Do you think people were unable to criticize the government before the invention of the internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/17 06:12 PM
6

Every login point will include your information. All your online activities are tied to your identity So? Companies like google already track all our online activity and sell the data to the highest bidder. Say even if you are not in the mood for hate speech and you just want to criticize the government, that can be traced back to you with repercussions Getting rid of internet anonymity does not get rid of the US constitution which guarantees freedom of speech without punishment from the governm…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/17 06:33 PM
2

Haha, true. But, those people will probably have trouble finding employment and/or romantic partners in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/17 05:45 PM
3

No, but I would like to do away with internet anonymity. If people have to put their name and face next to what they say, their rhetoric becomes less extreme, due to fear of social backlash. I want to allow these people to spew all their hateful thoughts, and then have them be forced to own the things they say and face the social consequences that follow. It would make it easier to avoid people with misogynistic views in real life, which I'm completely in favor of.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/17 04:51 PM
1

Fair enough. I'm always kind and pleasant when I get hit on, because I dislike confrontation. But, I'll still think of the guys as creepy randos after the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/17 04:45 PM
1

"non-judgement" becomes the highest virtue Are you then suggesting that being judgmental is a virtue? I think our culture is heading in a positive direction with the morality that you consider "weird" and "reverse" (whatever that means). No judgement unless an action causes direct harm is my kind of morality. Then in no time your whole civilization goes to shit due to the anarchy of all relations How are relations in anarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 09:01 PM
2

"non-judgement" becomes the highest virtue Are you then suggesting that being judgmental is a virtue? I think our culture is heading in a positive direction with the morality that you consider "weird" and "reverse" (whatever that means). No judgement unless an action causes direct harm is my kind of morality. Then in no time your whole civilization goes to shit due to the anarchy of all relations How are relations in anarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 09:00 PM
5

Your personal freedom ends where mine begins
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 08:56 PM
2

One can be sympathetic without being empathetic, I think that's part of what pity is. Sympathy is acknowledging that someone else is suffering, but not understanding what it would feel like to be in their shoes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 06:09 PM
1

Empathy would make people feel compelled to help them in some way, isn't it? Not necessarily. Empathy simply means that you can accurately understand and identify emotions in others.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 06:08 PM
1

But it also requires people to take the problem seriously and take action to help them Where's the definition for empathy that includes this requirement?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 06:05 PM
0

More personal freedom is always good, that's pretty much the only upside I can see. It's a rough dating scene, with top tier men breaking hearts left and right. Occasionally it's worth the risk, some women get lucky and end up marrying a guy who is both a "bad boy" and a "real man", basically the full package. The rest of us have to make the tough choice between playing a painful lottery or settling for a life of dissatisfaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 05:58 PM
8

Technology makes it easier and faster for people to get together, and thus easier for top percent men to pump and dump lots of women in record time. So, more women are becoming disillusioned at a faster rate. This is why I don't buy the fear mongering over the "cock carousel"; most women give up on casual sex after the first couple bad experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 05:53 PM
1

"Be a fucking asshole to everyone EXCEPT ME. Treat everyone EXCEPT ME like shit." Yep, that's the ideal. Kind of like a man's ideal is "be a prude to everyone EXCEPT ME. Be a slut but ONLY FOR ME"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 04:39 PM
1

Passionate, intelligent, witty, down to earth, humorous, dominant, brave and resilient, confident and playfully cocky, musically talented and creative, kind and altruistic from a place of strength (not supplicating), protective/possessive, animal lover
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 04:29 PM
1

One can expect to be hit on by undesirables and still be annoyed by it. Even if the weather forecast predicts hail, I still have the right to complain when a golf ball of ice hits me in the head.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 04:06 PM
2

Try online dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 04:01 PM
1

You're free to do what you want, but I personally don't want to be approached by men I don't find physically attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 04:00 PM
1

Men usually consider that rude, so I end up stuck in a conversation I want nothing to do with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/17 03:59 PM
1

We form serial pair bonds that last around 3-7 years, not life-long pair bonds.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 07:32 PM
2

Keep your romantic approaches limited to appropriate venues like bars, festivals, clubs, concerts, and dating sites/apps. Be capable of reading body language, don't approach unless I've already sent IoIs. Back off when I show I'm not interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 06:22 PM
3

Not often at all in real life. Most male faces are boring and average, same with most female faces. Height, six pack abs, broad shoulders and v shaped body
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/17 02:37 PM
2

Haha pretty much. But, it's not like I feel this for every attractive guy on the street, it's a pretty rare phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/17 05:02 PM
8

When I was a freshman in high school, I had a huge crush on the older brother of my friend's boyfriend. I don't think I ever said more than a handful of words to him, but seeing him around school would definitely feel like an emotional "punch in the gut". I remember looking forward to the exact time every day when I would see him in the hallway, just for that "punch in the gut" rush. I've only felt this infatuation on sight one other time, for my current dude, and it's probably because he highly…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/17 02:41 AM
3

That's exactly what I thought of. Have my upvote.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 06:24 PM
12

The red pill "article" didn't offer any solutions. Anyway, shouldn't red pill promote the man as the "project manager" who should take on the mental load?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 04:35 PM
1

after the victory of the left the period that followed is the least productive and successful if you think of the resources that the previous generations had left us The previous generations used slavery and colonization to boost resource production. Leftism has promoted mediocrity by rigging the game against the conscientious and able and promoting a natural selection that would fit beasts (and probably not even them) not men Natural selection consistently creates animals better adapted to thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 10:22 PM
4

Thad would get laid more easily, but he'd do even better if he managed to grow a spine.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 07:36 PM
3

Attractive people will always have options waiting in the wings. You have to trust the strength of your relationship and your ability to keep your partner interested. Giving in to the paranoia will put unnecessary pressure on the relationship and might even create a self fulfilling prophecy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 05:05 PM
3

Hell nah. I want to get married and have kids some day. And even if I didn't, I wouldn't be able to shake the fear that the guy's a closet misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 04:57 PM
2

I approached him because he was the hottest guy at the party, we're dating because we ended up clicking very well. There's no backwards rationalization, that was the actual timeline.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/17 04:02 PM
2

If I'm sober, yes. If I'm drunk or high I'm much more likely to take my chances. I met my current guy at a party and couldn't gather the courage to approach him and start a conversation until after a couple glasses of wine. He was literally the hottest guy there, it was a little intimidating. Thankfully it was a Halloween party, so the typical "nice costume" opener was on table, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 07:15 PM
1

Agreed. Being a feminist won't make a man more sexually attractive, but it will make him more attractive for a relationship. Hot white knights are the ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 04:05 PM
1

Extremely immoral predatory behavior. It's morally wrong to value getting your dick wet over the lives of your fellow survivors.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 04:03 PM
1

If hedonism is "primitive" then it is natural and by definition doesn't need to be enforced and is not experimental at all. Forced monogamy to genetically unfit men was the experiment, leftism has brought back natural selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/17 03:59 PM
3

You keep saying this like it's unfair or that people should give a shit
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 09:18 PM
3

Sure, I could see this. But a lot of red pill men seem to completely deny the existence of the "natural alpha" feminist male.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 07:14 PM
2

Sure, I could see this. But a lot of red pill men seem to completely deny the existence of the "natural alpha" feminist male.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 07:14 PM
4

Are you kidding? Women create and men destroy. Women birth life, men take life. Men are the ultimate destroyers, they created gun powder and nuclear bombs.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/17 07:01 PM
2

the smarter the animal the more emotions it seems to have (humans, chimps, elephants, dolphins all high on emotionality) There's absolutely a connection there. The only really intelligent animal I can think of off the top of my head that doesn't appear to be emotional would be the octopus/squid. But, that might be because we can't perceive how a cephalopod could express emotion. It's silly how emotions as a concept are thrown under the bus. The most logical organism would probably be a virus or …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 09:56 PM
2

However where women tend to fuck up is that they can't control their love of outwardly expressing their emotions instead of introspecting on them the way men do But, what about the findings which indicate that women tend to internalize their feelings whereas men externalize?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 09:33 PM
2

NEVER GONNA GIVE YOU UP~ Ugh charts, my female right-brained mind doesn't like all those numbers jumbled together. Give me a jumble of paragraphs any day. Ok, I'm diving in! Results suggest that there is convergence of both modes in adulthood, as originally mooted (Epstein et al., 1996). However the timing may be different for women and men This is about what I expected. Good stuff!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 09:21 PM
1

Very cool, thanks! Quite surprising that younger men are more rational, when they happen to be the group with the highest tendency for risk-taking. But, that study seems to concern "young adult" (aka adolescent) brains, not adult brains. So, I wonder if the findings would be different if they studied fully formed brains (of people over the age of 25-26).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 09:15 PM
2

It seems the amygdala is the center for emotional memory, but not necessarily logic. The frontal lobe is where logic takes place, if I'm not mistaken. And "parts of the frontal lobe, responsible for problem-solving and decision-making, and the limbic cortex, responsible for regulating emotions, are larger in women"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 09:10 PM
2

You really want me to go off and google into existence the less logical/rational part ? Yes, haha. So far you've provided some really good info, I'd like to see if you could do the same with this one. I readily accept other "RP-lite" factoids, like that women are typically more emotional, but I don't buy into the belief that emotions limit logical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 09:06 PM
3

This, so much. Emotion and logic do not sit at opposing poles, they're not opposites and they're both equally important. I think of emotions like the gas and break pedals in a car, and logic as the steering wheel. Without logic you'd be flying off the road, but without emotions you'd be at a standstill.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 09:02 PM
3

But, that still does not qualify as proof that women are collectively less logical, which is what OP is asking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 08:59 PM
3

Argentina, Afghanistan, and Japan could get my number
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/17 04:23 AM
1

Humans are more likely to use covert violence/deception when they perceive a power differential that does not favor them. Women appear more likely to use these tactics, because they're typically the weaker party. Besides, what is tea-bag? I was making a joke. It's when men crouch down and rub their junk on someone's face as a sort of insult to injury.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 11:51 PM
1

Women don't tea-bag, obviously :P
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 11:46 PM
1

Incorrect. A smaller man will stab a larger man in the back, then tea-bag him afterward.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 11:40 PM
1

A man will only stab you in the face if he already believes he's stronger than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 11:39 PM
2

But the point is, they are not actually wealthy You have a strange definition of wealthy. It doesn't matter how one gains their money, possessing a large amount of money makes you wealthy. By your example, lottery winners are wealthy but low class. On the other hand, I would laugh in the face of anyone who claimed Google founders weren't upper class And I'd laugh in the face of anyone who claimed the "duck dynasty" people are high class. Also, by your convoluted definition, wouldn't the google f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 05:56 PM
2

It is laughable, but it's the way it has always worked. I didn't make the rules. It's value doesn't change by the approval of some "legit" caste members It does, though. You can be rich and low class: plenty of athletes, musicians, and entrepreneurs fall into this category. The "duck dynasty" family is the epitome of this. No one in their right mind would call the members of the "duck dynasty" high class. "New money", people who came into their fortune suddenly, tend to lose their money just as …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 05:48 PM
3

You're mistaken. Wealth and class often go together, but you can't buy class. People who inherit status call people who attempt to buy their way into the upper class as "new money", and "new money" folks can never truly be part of the club.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 05:42 PM
2

A wage slave can still come from an upper class family and inherit that upper class status. Plenty of non-rich people are members of yacht clubs (and they don't even own a boat!), they just possess a good/old family name and social connections.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 05:38 PM
1

There is no upper class You know the people who go to country clubs/yacht clubs and own vacation homes? That's the upper class. People whose families have had social status and money for generations inherit their class.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 05:35 PM
1

Well, let's use a moderately overweight woman as an example instead of an obese woman, you could still find her appealing to the eye, yes? But, you'd also be aware that she'd be more appealing if she dropped some pounds. I know you have repteadedly expressed a strong dislike for short men, but I was just trying to give you a different perspective I appreciate it :) new/different perspectives are always useful
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 05:29 PM
1

And there are fat women with beautiful faces, but they'd still be more attractive if they were thin. A short man can have an attractive face, but they would still be more attractive if they were tall. Tall is more aesthetically pleasing, to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 05:00 PM
1

At least a woman will leave you alive after she swindles you. A man will just stab you in the back or crush your head in while your back is turned. Duplicity is a human trait, not a female one. The tactics between the genders may differ, but the self serving inclinations are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 04:47 PM
2

Men's natural sexual instincts can also destabilize societies. Men desperately want to compete with each other for women's sexual attention, its ingrained in them. There will always be tension between men as a result. Men are like stags in rutting season, always ready to butt heads for a chance to reproduce. Men also have the instinct to create as many babies as they can, with as many women as they can. In a world where men's instincts are allowed to go unchecked, there would be gangs brawling a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/17 04:33 PM
1

Alpha is a mindset, not a set of physical attributes That's the definition men with beta/omega genes like to use. I prefer to think it's rather inborn, since our personalities are highly affected by our DNA.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 01:27 AM
2

If you allow transhumanism, then you allow caste based society Absolutes like that are rarely true. We have no idea what society would be like if trans-humanism truly existed, it's all speculation. Perhaps we would live in a post-scarcity communist society with no castes and no competition? don't have genetic dispositions as bad as yours and may currently have a lower SMV tbut have genetic potential higher than yours Lol, SMV is highly related to genetic potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/17 01:23 AM
2

It's not like you need that many, you know how hot guys get around.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 10:28 PM
1

I hadn't even thought of that, that's probably a factor as well. But, how much tail is the average homeless schizophrenic realistically getting? And shouldn't getting off the streets be more important than getting an erection?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:48 PM
1

Very true. And I think a lot of the non-compliance comes from the social stigma surrounding psychiatric drugs. Maybe there could be some sort of incentives program to keep these people on their meds?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:31 PM
2

I only define alpha as genetically physically attractive. There are hot brainiacs out there that can pick up the slack if we lose our incel Einsteins.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:28 PM
3

Do you really believe all alphas are "brainless"? There are enough genetically fit men with both brains and brawn in the gene pool. Society will be fine without betas, sorry to burst your revenge fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 09:15 PM
2

Of course, that sounds ideal. I want my child to have the best possible start. I honestly don't see a moral/ethical dilemma when no actual humans are being harmed. I don't believe in god, so I don't understand the inherent harm in "playing god".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 08:14 PM
1

Beats me
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:59 PM
1

Uglies have a chance close to 0 for casual sex, and non 0 for everything else, if they're extraordinary individuals. Otherwise it's going to continue since, for the purpose of getting sex, it works just fine Until men stop viewing sex as some reward, I suppose you're right
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:49 PM
1

So saying they're the only things that matter is clearly incorrect I've never claimed they're the only things that matter. But, they do matter much more for casual sex. that seems like you saying it's wrong for even the attractive man to be saying it now? Am I getting your message right? I personally would find it equally wrong, but I'm not the moral arbiter of the world. And I'm not trying to force other women to have the same moral views as I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:44 PM
1

in a world so deviant from nature alone with all kinds of social and technological developments That's irrelevant. People will always find physical traits which signal genetic fitness to be attractive, and that's a good thing. Technology and society are fleeting, your genetic legacy is forever. It also seems to paint women as being a hivemind who only are attracted to one thing - still doesn't seem feminist to me I'm a naturalistic feminist, so I'm more on the side of nature over nurture. I know…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:35 PM
1

I'm one of those hypocritical meat-eating animal-lovers. I try to support local farms, but I've found that I hate the taste of grass-fed animals. I've felt very guilty about it, but I guess I'm just used to the taste of grain-fed animals. So, I've decided to go another route and use my vote and signature to support legislation that makes the lives and deaths of farm animals more humane. I don't understand people that can screw without any care about who the other person is beyond physical appear…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:27 PM
7

Most chronically homeless people are very mentally ill. So, if we want to solve the problem, we should start there. Homeless shelters should offer psychiatric care, if needed. Unfortunately, a lot of people don't want to "waste" their tax dollars on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:22 PM
1

Do you really believe ugly men have 0.00% chance of getting laid? Through organic sexual attraction, yes. Even those ugly yet popular with women celebrities people always bring up in response to that belief? That's not organic attraction, that's buying attention with money/status and overriding natural turn offs. That doesn't really answer the part of my question anyway. Well, you never gave specifics on what the hypothetical offensive guy said. So, I kept things intentionally vague.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:19 PM
2

Men don't have to conform to gender roles if they don't want to, but naturally masculine men are more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:16 PM
1

but it is a reward for applying certain behaviors looking to get a result Men may see it that way, women never will. Men are always trying out certain things looking to get sex in casual relationships. So it follows that behavior that rewards sex more often will be repeated But they're confused, behavioral tactics won't make women more likely to have sex. If you're not attractive, you can't "game" your way into sex. Dudes think women have sex with hot jerks because they're jerks, nope, it's beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:15 PM
1

By acknowledging that sex isn't the end all be all? It's not a reward given to good people and withheld from bad people. It's not any woman's place to tell another woman what to do with her body, and who to allow entrance into it. All we can do is create a social environment where negative, a-social, and harmful behaviors are discouraged.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 07:01 PM
1

The woman is entitled to her opinions and complaints. And he is entitled to maintain or change his behavior as he sees fit. Whether someone should or should not take a complaint seriously is up to them as an individual. But, if enough individuals have a problem with this guy's behavior that the numbers start to add up, then there's obviously something there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:53 PM
1

That depends. Legally or socially?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:49 PM
1

The more feminist women is offended by his language. Does she get to complain? People always have the freedom to complain. It sounds like the attractive guy and the offended woman wouldn't make a good match.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:47 PM
1

If the words don't change between both of the conversations, then what do you say the man did wrong if one of women feels put off? The man did not read the situation correctly, he needs to improve his social intelligence. Unattractive people should be aware that they can't always get away with the same behavior as attractive people, just like a homeless person can't expect to act like a millionaire and be treated the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:44 PM
1

but that seems to imply that all women would react the same to it Most PEOPLE are susceptible to the halo effect and the double standards that follow. This is uncontroversial.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:41 PM
1

Is it okay with feminism when people like Ann Coulter or whoever go on Fox News to favor Trump Sure, that's freedom of speech. or hold up signs and say cruel things to women trying to have abortions? No, that's harassment. Any other questions?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:35 PM
0

Should anyone take the vegetarian seriously when they say "no no no, meat is murder. This is just lunch, it doesn't mean anything, and it doesn't contradict my views at all. I'm just hungry and I like the way steak tastes. It's still wrong to eat meat, and the food industry needs to change, and people should stop eating meat. Don't pay attention to my actions here, listen to my philosophy and what I have to say on the subject..." You can be aware that animals are being murdered for their meat, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:30 PM
1

Then I don't see how promoting double standards for possibly demeaning behavior based on physical attractiveness helps that It's promoting women's freedom to have whatever standards they want, feminism does not promote the double standards themselves. Feminism didn't create the double standards, nature did.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:26 PM
2

That doesn't sound very feminist to me Feminism is about allowing women to make their own choices, it's not about controlling their behavior. Anti-feminists do not get to decide what is "feminist" and what is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 06:21 PM
1

To women, the average man is as unattractive as a "500 pound hairy woman" is to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 03:53 PM
1

No shit, people want to have sex with attractive people and will put up with more bullshit from attractive people. I always do a reverse image search on men who look too good to be true. Most guys you see while online dating look like interchangeable pieces of of chubby beta Styrofoam, anyone who makes me do a double-take is probably fake, or just looking to hit it and quit it. Either way, I wouldn't take the bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 03:50 PM
3

Maybe they'll get it if we compare it to a straight man getting lots of attention from gay men. Technically those men are options, but they're not real options.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 03:46 PM
1

Open relationships only work if the man is hot. In other news, water is wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 03:34 PM
0

They're not even worthy of hate, just disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/17 03:33 PM
1

This is why gen x guys are hotter
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 06:00 PM
1

You still get 50% from each parent (possibly slightly more from mom with mitochondrial DNA), but genes work like "on/off" switches, so the genes from the father are more likely to be "on"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/17 12:34 AM
2

Vanity, consumerism, shallowness, lack of morals and character - these are all things normie These are all things human. What do you consider a lack of morals? Lack of religion? Lack of sexual modesty? I admire those who are not afraid to be alone in their rejection of the idiocracy And you admire yourself for that? That seems a bit vain and pretentious, from where I'm standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:58 PM
2

normies are as pathetic as sheep I find people who use words like "normies" unironically to be more sheep-like and sad. Their internet communities all bleat the same words "cuck, sjw, normies, chad"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:50 PM
2

I trust GMOs more than I trust robots. Robots are equal in creep-factor to clowns, for me. Maybe cyborgs wouldn't scare me as much, but AI sure does.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:47 PM
1

how would your theory account for the fact that there are many high-status, unattractive people? It's not a perfectly reliable proxy for genetic quality :P That's why women also have eyes and noses with which to determine a suitable mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:45 PM
2

The human Y chromosome is very small, and codes very few genes to the X (not sure if that applies to mice as well). So, it may be that even if they are expressed more heavily the effects of "All Y Genes" is stil less than "All X Genes". But, could be an interesting new thing This is what I was thinking about, as well. I carry a gene for a serious bleeding disorder that I inherited from my father, but because I have a spare x chromosome, that gene is not expressed. This has no relation to whether…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:41 PM
2

"Folate" seems to be very important for fetal development, the good news is I take folic acid on the daily. I'm prepping early! he joined her in solidarity in her diet, no drinking no smoking etc. I always thought that was the most charming thing Aww! That's incredibly sweet of him. I wouldn't expect my future husband to do the same, but that is just so thoughtful.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:33 PM
2

I have a theory that social status is just a proxy for genetic fitness. There are very few genetically fit ostracized individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:30 PM
1

Thanks! This will just make me paranoid about what I ingest if/when I eventually get pregnant, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:22 PM
1

Therefore any given offspring statistically expects their father to be of above average genetic quality in the male gene pool, and their mother to be average. The offspring then will be best served by expressing the father's genes more than the mother's Yep. And having a father with mediocre genetics will negatively impact offspring more than having a mother with mediocre genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:16 PM
1

Very cool! We know so little about epigenetics, it's staggering. Do you have a link?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:15 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:13 PM
1

The fact that the genes are expressed at all is the explanation for female selectiveness. Agreed, but the fact that male mutations are more strongly expressed gives women even more reason to be selective.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:11 PM
7

Lol, I think that's taking it a bit far. But, if that's how you want to interpret the study, be my guest.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:11 PM
1

Purple. My parents remained together until my mother's death four years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 09:02 PM
2

Nope. People don't want to be valued for their usefulness and nothing else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 07:57 PM
1

Forgive my frustration but have you heard of sites such as everyday feminism? Jezebel? They are not far off from tumblr. I've heard of them, but I've never visited them personally. The people I associate with are moderate, casual feminists who would probably consider Jezebel to be tabloidish. I mean even the president pushes the wage gap myth And I agree that an earnings gap exists between men and women. People disagree about the cause of the gap and what we should do about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 07:51 PM
2

feminism likes to call men who like looking at women in general women objectifying As a feminist, I've never in my life heard or seen another feminist make a statement like that. That sounds like some tumblr extremist baloney. All those men you listed are piss in an ocean From the perspective of people who don't encounter them or deal with their harassment. To their targets, these guys are everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 07:11 PM
2

most men who feminists accuse of objectifying women are just as considerate of their feelings as you would be of that ticket taker Are they, though? Catcallers and men who leer in public certainly are not considerate of their victim's feelings of discomfort. Men who pump and dump relationship-desiring women are also not considerate of their feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 06:59 PM
2

You can enjoy someone's body while still being considerate of their feelings. They're not mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 06:52 PM
5

They won't just rape them Not assaulting someone is the lowest bar for human decency, it's not something you get a ribbon for. And a lack of rape does not mean a lack of objectification.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 06:45 PM
6

I actually like this one. Feels Aesop-eque.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 06:34 PM
3

Not caring about their hopes and dreams and not caring about their well-being/feelings are two different things. I don't care about the ticket taker's favorite color, but I'll still be considerate of their wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 06:18 PM
7

Then that's being inconsiderate, not objectification Someone who is inconsiderate is more likely to objectify people. A symptom of objectification is inconsiderate behavior. This really isn't that hard to understand. Ah so people in the US are poorer than Chinese waiters? your moving the goal posts now The fuck? China and the US have two very different cultures and economies. I don't know why you even brought Asia into this. Not leaving a tip is inconsiderate specifically in America.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 06:03 PM
7

But if your aware someone is looking for a relationship your acknowledging them as a human with thoughts and feelings It's not just acknowledging the other person's thoughts and feelings, it's giving a shit about them. You can be aware of someone's feelings while simultaneously being inconsiderate of them. So all people in Asia objectify waiters since they don't give tips? Don't be obtuse. People in that culture do not depend on tips to pay their bills, I'm clearly referring to western/US cultur…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 05:59 PM
4

It's pretty obvious when someone has no regard for the another person's feelings or needs. Thoughts often become actions. Using someone for sex when you're fully aware that they're looking for a relationship, leaving no tip after ordering a large expensive meal 5 minutes before closing, intentionally making a huge mess right in front of a janitor and treating him like he's a roomba. These are the actions of someone who objectifies people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 05:45 PM
8

Viewing a person as a utility, as a means to an end, and not as a complete human being with thoughts/feelings/desires. Sexual objectification is not the only form of objectification, in fact, I'd argue it's not even the most common form: think of how some people treat waitstaff or janitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 05:31 PM
5

A woman can outright say to an orbiter "I am not attracted to you and I never will be" and the delusional guy will still think he has a chance. A lot of dudes misinterpret regular friendly behavior as flirtation. Women don't even need to lie, these men lie to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 03:06 PM
2

Assume most advice given by women is meant for already attractive men. We don't think about average/below average dudes as sexual entities, they're not even on our radar. An unattractive guy being emotionally expressive doesn't lessen his chances of attracting a woman, because he never had a chance to begin with. As for your question, I think it can be both. We want to help all men be emotionally/mentally healthier, and we also want to keep unattractive men out of the gene pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 02:50 PM
5

I'd love for that beta-faced chubster to be the face of the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 02:41 PM
3

I'd like more female-oriented porn, but there's no way in hell I'd ever pay for it. For the same reason why women don't typically pay for prostitutes, why pay for something you can easily get for free?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 02:35 PM
1

I'm into porn, but it takes time to find a video that won't immediately disgust me. Things that turn me off completely: gagging, spitting, and anything related to anal. Unfortunately, a majority of modern porn videos contain these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 02:30 PM
0

Men wouldn't be able to lie their way into getting their dicks wet, and women wouldn't have to wonder if their male friends are really their friends. Sounds good to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/17 02:23 PM
1

True. That must be frustrating for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 08:44 PM
1

Find an even hotter man and try to lock him down?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 07:43 PM
5

Sick haiku, bro
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 07:35 PM
2

you could go along and start to argue it's a man's job to provide resources and a woman's job to stay at home and take care of the children Sure, those would be the natural roles our sexes would have taken on in a survival setting. But that doesn't mean people should be obligated to fall into those roles in modern society. that women should always obey the husband because he is a more natural leader (dimorphism again) Men are stronger and larger, that makes them natural protectors, but not neces…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 05:22 PM
2

Not really. Sexual behavior is seperate from public behavior, but men seem to want to conflate the two. Being a sexually dimorphic species with a "mating dance" that reflects it doesn't mean we're incapable of having an equal society.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 03:36 PM
1

Only in the bedroom, and only to worthy men. Women do not want to be dominated by all men on a societal level.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 03:17 PM
1

Absolutely. At first it will be quite messy, as rich, high class people will be the ones most able to afford gene alteration. But, once the treatment is normalized and cheap, it will be glorious for everyone. No more incels, no more insecurity, no more genetic mediocrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/17 03:06 PM
1

Obviously nawalt, I was speaking in generalities
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 09:21 PM
1

True, and this is especially difficult for women to understand. For us it's either a yes or a no, for both sex and relationships. While a man could consider a woman as a yes for sex and a no for a relationship, which is very odd from a female perspective. If I view a man as good enough for sex, I'll generally consider him relationship material as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 06:44 PM
1

Yep. Sorry guys, this is feature not a bug.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 06:43 PM
3

I'd say this is true of all people, because we're all flawed, and the only person with the most intimate knowledge of your flaws is yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 06:34 PM
0

He is also a perfect example of what happens when we stop lying and telling men what they want to hear, they get angry and violent over the "unfairness" of it all. Oh, don't tell me you've never seen that sort of comment chain, especially on subs like r/short or r/incels?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 06:31 PM
1

Is this sarcasm?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 04:28 PM
0

Elliot Roger, literally every anger-phaser.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 04:27 PM
1

With a firm rule of oral sex only.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 04:24 PM
2

Some people don't have any side effects, or their side effects are mostly beneficial. I lost my acne and gained tits and ass when I started hormonal bc, so I can't really complain. The increase in weight and appetite has been annoying, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/17 04:22 PM
10

The happiest relationships are the ones with an smv gap favoring the woman. The guy gets to be treated like a god by his woman, and the woman has her hypergamy satisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 08:29 PM
11

No, because when we do, men throw hissy fits and call us shallow sluts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 08:25 PM
0

Obviously. Unwanted attention is more annoying than desired attention
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 07:03 PM
4

If it was a guy I'm attracted to/crushing on, I'd definitely feel a strong twinge of jealousy. Otherwise, I literally wouldn't give a shit. I'm not everyone's type, and that's ok. Not everyone is into cute curvy blondes (but a lot of men are!) What's one fish lost when you have a sea full of options? Scarcity mentality is a male problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/17 05:55 PM
1

We just recently became exclusive, so I'm working on it ;p
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 06:28 PM
2

tall, symmetrical, musculature, status, plays a "cool" musical instrument well etc etc) and in Beta (also has money, is good with kids, adopts puppies, is honest and trustworthy, keeps his flat clean etc etc). I better hurry and lock down the guy I'm dating, because that's literally a description of him.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 05:11 PM
1

Feminism is both an equality movement and an advocacy group for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 10:11 PM
1

No one is making that argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 10:04 PM
4

I see you've offered no valid counter-argument. I acknowledge your failed attempt. Move along, now.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 03:53 PM
3

Historical context does not absolve immoral actions. Slavery was considered amoral at one point in history, that doesn't make slavery any less objectively immoral. I consider most all violence immoral, unless in self defense. Why do we consider Martin Luther King more moral than Malcom x? Because he did not use violent tactics. Psychopaths have no internal moral compass, and most psychopaths are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 03:44 PM
7

Which gender was raping, pillaging, and massacring throughout history? Which gender still commits the most violent crimes? Which gender has the highest representation of psychopaths? Answer to all of the above: not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 02:09 PM
1

Moisturize and exfoliate, people!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 08:44 PM
3

Ew no
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 08:39 PM
1

I'd say you're average, but you do have nice skin
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 08:35 PM
1

Never. Athletes aren't my type. I'm much more likely to fantasize about a guitarist on stage, wondering what his fingers would feel like inside me. Boneheads throwing balls around really do nothing for me. However, I do enjoy watching mma for less than wholesome reasons ;) Shirtless sweaty dudes rolling around? Yes please.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 02:09 PM
3

Nice coping mechanism. In reality, there are plenty of "bad boys" with good morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 02:00 PM
1

One is immoral, the other is unattractive For me personally, being chosen for commitment by a dude who has pumped and dumped lots of other girls is very validating in an almost vindicating way. Because I've been on the wrong end of a couple p & ds.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 01:44 PM
2

Pumping and dumping is morally worse, but I'd still date a guy who has done that in the past, assuming he's changed and feels bad about it. I would never date a man who's seen an "escort" (prostitute).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/17 01:42 PM
1

And a peaceful world would be a better world.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 09:48 PM
1

I don't think anyone belongs to their country, rather the country belongs to them. I'd be fine if everyone were more individualistic, then the men who start wars would have to actually fight their own battles.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 07:27 PM
3

Slut shaming originates with abrahamic religion. A bunch of bitter sexless dudes got together and wrote "holy books" that gave them a "God-given" right to treat women badly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 06:49 PM
3

Wow, I agree with you again! The world must be ending
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 06:31 PM
1

There's the same perctentage of attractive dudes as anywhere else, but most of the hot guys will also share my political views. A masculine/hot white knight makes the perfect boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 06:12 PM
8

I do fuck that guy, yum
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 02:35 AM
6

That kind of dude would be way too intimidating. I'll take a lesser feminist Chad :P The kind that's in a band, cool as fuck, and also goes to women's marches.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 01:05 AM
1

I just hope I don't try to date someone with hypocritical beliefs that disadvantage me. But, you're right, if people keep their preferences to themselves, then it's no harm no foul.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 01:03 AM
4

Chad Thundercock, but with a heavy coat of liberal political ideology. He doesn't play football, he plays Ultimate Frisbee, votes for Bernie, smokes a little weed, reads The Ethical Slut, and is a chill dude These are the type of guys I fuck and date. Gotta love living in a "liberal feminist stronghold" lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 12:54 AM
2

Jim Morrison without a doubt. Musicians with long hair always win, in my book.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 12:53 AM
3

Some of these responses are pretty disturbing, people seem to be implying that a woman is the property of her country. Personally, I don't blame women for sleeping with the conquering army, if it meant their survival. Countries and nations are nothing when it comes to life or death.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 12:52 AM
1

People are free to have hypocritical preferences, and other people are free to judge them for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/17 12:30 AM
1

It implies the man cannot generate lust organically in women, or that he doesn't care if the woman he's fucking is genuinely into it or not, and it also implies that the man views sex as a commodity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 06:03 PM
2

But, my womanly instincts are being unfairly repressed! REEEE I can't properly defend my food, only send debilitating glares in the food-thief's direction. messing with someone's food is an offense on par with genocide, regardless of gender, and anyone is within their rights to swiftly end the monster try to attempt such a travesty Lmao, for once I completely agree with you. Very few things piss me off, but taking my food without asking is one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:47 PM
1

Lol, so you agree men aren't the only ones having their violent natures repressed by laws and society?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:38 PM
1

Women have a violent nature, too. My instincts tell me to bite the finger off anyone who steals food from my plate, do you think I should be allowed to do that in a civil society?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:31 PM
1

I mean, yes, but for war purposes Oh please, these men aren't doing it for the good of society, they're controlling women for the good of their own dicks. You're giving men waaaay too much credit. However, feminism refuses to recognize this and basically tells those men to eat shit or die We don't need those men anymore, we'll have robots that won't demand their payment comes in the form of vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:10 PM
1

I'm not sure, it likely has to do with our primitive brains seeing any divergent from the norm as a possible threat. It's why the "creepy" feeling is like a pre-courser to fear.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 04:09 PM
1

If you're ok with men lying about paying for sex, then you should be ok with women lying about their n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:58 PM
1

That's fine, as long as you're not being hypocritical. I've never paid for sex, so I'm not being hypocritical in wanting a partner who also hasn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:56 PM
1

Doesn't matter, it's still gross and unattractive to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:55 PM
1

Even if the man in question were reasonably attractive, I'd still lose all attraction if I found out he visited a prostitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:53 PM
2

The woman has already earned the commitment, the proposal is the culmination of all the woman's efforts throughout the relationship. The man is the one who can give or take commitment, so by freely offering it he is solidifying their relationship. Also, good luck getting your girlfriend to propose to you and then remain attracted to you afterward.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/17 03:52 PM
2

No, it's because they want to control women's sexuality. They know deep down most of them would never get laid if they didn't control women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 11:14 PM
2

literally all the stories he has about him are about the Corgi being a gigantic asshole Wow, I don't think I could handle a dog like that. Even though corgis are my favorite, in cuteness alone. My sister has a Jack Russell and that dog is insane in the membrane. She climbs trees! Mine is only hyper when she sees an animal she wants to chase. Otherwise, she's very chill. But, I know she would be jealous of that dog, the squirrels around here drive her insane!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 11:10 PM
1

our current beagle mix is beagle/Corgi Aw, that sounds adorable. I've always wanted a corgi, but if I ever do get one it will have to be a mutt mixed with a less intense breed, lol. nowhere NEAR as bad as the beagle/basset mix that we used to have Oh the dreaded DOUBLE HOUND. It's like it multiplies all their annoying tendencies. And yes, dogs are social animals, but hounds are generally more social with other dogs than they are with people. They are bred to hunt in pairs or in packs, much more …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 10:57 PM
1

Perhaps. That would be commitment like enough to you? Yeah, it makes sense. There's a reason relationships seem to go sour after the 5-7 year mark, that's the age when kids become less demanding. Serial monogamy in our tribal past probably consisted of loose commitments that were reevaluated after each child matured a bit. Do you think it drives the average woman crazy too? Aging definitely does. But, I don't know if the knowledge of mortality drives women crazy as much as it does men. I know I …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 10:50 PM
1

I have a beagle/jack russel and she can definitely be willful, especially when she's "on the hunt". But, she's not that hard to train. She's just as food motivated as prey motivated, thankfully. If you can housebreak one 90%, you are doing very very well I guess I'm lucky on this front. My pooch has only ever thrown up in the house, never once had any other accident. Stoney and his wife could ignore the shit out of their hound every morning for the rest of its life, and if he has decided that he…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 10:35 PM
1

Why? I would doubt that couples raised kids back then over the tribe raising all the kids too I definitely think people still pair-bonded and practiced serial monogamy, even if the children were raised communally. It's certainly not easy to see reality when you're on the losing end Indeed. But, we're all on the losing end of something in life. We're on the losing end of life itself, when you think about it. We're given existence only to have it eventually taken away from us. How unfair of mother…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:56 PM
2

Training dogs, training kids, training people, it's all just a big battle of willpower. Your grey hound sounds very willful, that's why he wins and gets his breakfast when he demands it. If your wife had ignored him completely instead of entering his "frame", he might have eventually gotten tired of being annoying. It would take a few days of doing this, but eventually he'd realize the tactic doesn't work. It's like when a kid throws a tantrum, if you give in once they'll throw a tantrum every t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:51 PM
2

Hmm I'd clarify that in that women want alpha seed, not alpha commitment And you'd be wrong. It's all or nothing, from a woman's perspective. Just getting the alpha seed is like only getting the bottom half of a trophy, the part that the actual trophy stands on. Fight, fuck, or die, it is the way of life. Consume or be consumed And those who are consumed can only see the harshness of nature and not the greater beauty of it all, which I find kind of sad. There could be no winners without losers, …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:31 PM
10

I'd initially feel kind of bad for him, but if he's happy with the decision, then I'm happy for him. My friend's sex life is none of my business, because I'm never going to date him. I would never fuck or date a man who has paid for sex, but it's irrelevant when it comes to friendship.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:24 PM
3

It's not entitled, it's a strong as fuck male drive And women have a strong as fuck drive for alpha commitment, but a 300 pound woman wanting a male model for a husband wouldn't go over well with most people. It comes across as entitlement, like you believe you're so special that the other person should give up their sexual needs so you can meet yours. But I don't really expect you to care, you should basically want such men to not reproduce anyways Ok, cool. It's the ones that expect me to care…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:17 PM
3

So, he knows he has bad genes and yet feels entitled to partners with good genes?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 08:08 PM
2

/r/thathappened If you were actually a badass capable of winning fights, you wouldn't be whining on an online forum, you'd be out fucking bitches and going to court dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 07:30 PM
2

Don't you think the majority of modern men are weak? They've lived peaceful, sedentary lives. They have low testosterone, and most have never even touched a weapon. Do you think they'd suddenly adapt and become Conan the barbarian?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 07:27 PM
1

So, when was the last time you were in a fist fight? When was the last time you shot a gun? How would you incapacitate a 6'7 powerhouse and his friends? With a fedora and katana?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 07:20 PM
3

The muscle head would also have guns and friends just as monstrous as he is. The real survivors would be the men who are in prisons or gangs today, men who have actually been living in a kill or die world since they could hold a gun, not nerds fantasizing about a return to anarchy. Men who think their videogame skills would help them in an actual violent situation make me laugh so hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 07:18 PM
3

No, you absolutely wouldn't be one of them (unless you're their bitch). Your fantasy is so sad it's funny. Anarchy would chew you up and spit you out, just like most everyone else. Have you ever even been in a physical fight in your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 07:14 PM
4

If men are "free", it's scary for everyone, not just women. Do you think only women would get raped or murdered if laws suddenly disappeared? The lives and holes of everyone unable to fight off a 6'7 250 pound muscle head would be at risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 06:58 PM
1

Female preference naturally selects for fit genes. The traits women are attracted to indicate high testosterone, strong immune systems, and leadership capabilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 06:55 PM
2

So? Sex isn't a reward only given to people who have "redeemable traits". It's given to people with good genes, it's that simple. That's the way it's supposed to be. Reproductive access is not a charity or a prize to be earned.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 06:29 PM
2

When in Rome, do as the spergs do. Lol, sexual "degeneracy" doesn't cause people to become psychopaths. Those people having sex aren't being rewarded for being douchebags, they're rewarded for have sexy phenotypes. If being an asshole were enough to get laid, bitter incel losers would be drowning in pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 06:18 PM
3

Can I just say I fucking hate burps? They're so gross. I'd be so much prouder if my son could fart the alphabet. Anyway, I agree that boys and girls shouldn't be forced into activities and fashion they personally dislike, but I also believe it's unhealthy to view the opposite sex (and anything associated with them) as bad. I nanny for a 3 year old boy who's as rambunctious and boyish as they come. He loves to stomp around, throw things, run around, get dirty, climb and jump off of everything. Bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 06:12 PM
5

Women's innate desire for freedom is way stronger than men's. Men want a strict societal hierarchy, one with logical rules, one that they can fight their way to the top in. They want to control and possess everything in their environment, especially women. Women would rather have more fluid, relaxed social hierarchies that form and break organically, without much conflict. On a biological level, freedom for women means the freedom to choose the best father for their children. The power of sexual…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 05:53 PM
5

I'd probably laugh and tell him that I'm his girlfriend, not his boyfriend. And if he wants this, then it's time he found a boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 05:50 PM
3

If femaloids The fuck is a "femaloid"? Is this is a new word for spergs to further dehumanize women with? How dull. are dumb enough to fall for you time and again then why not keep tearing through them? Because most people have this little thing called a conscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 05:48 PM
2

Most, if not all, of the 50 messages are from unattractive men who would never have the balls to approach in real life. So, the majority of messages are basically inbox filler. And then when you get a messsage from the 1 hot guy out of thousands, he's just looking for a hook up. It takes a lot of time and effort for a woman to find an attractive man who's also in the market for a relationship, especially online. I've gotten literally thousands of messages on okc over the course of three years, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/17 04:21 PM
2

All women think like this. "No one is entitled to sex, don't be an immoral douchebag" is completely uncontroversial.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/17 02:01 PM
9

I guess some pathetic part of me believes a girl will see it and offer herself to me Thanks for saying it's pathetic, saves everyone else the time. You're probably better off posting these kind of desires alongside an ab pic on fetlife. So, good luck making your delusions dreams come true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 08:49 PM
11

I don't think you could have phrased this in a more creepy fashion, even if you tried. Yikes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 08:43 PM
2

resort to force and fraud Oh don't act like they're the victims here. "Force and fraud" is just a nicer way of saying rape and lie. Some men will never be "worthy of a woman's sex", and they should just get over it instead of resorting to shitty immoral tactics.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 08:37 PM
3

women chase studs because women get their value singals by watching what the pack does "The pack" happens to find most of the same traits attractive, because those masculine traits indicate genetic fitness. It's a desire born out of instinct, not pack mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 03:05 AM
3

I have a high sex drive, I get turned on when I look at hot guys, I orgasm in almost every sexual encounter, and I still want to at least like the person I'm fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/17 02:40 AM
3

Seriously. Who wants to bump uglies with someone they don't even like? The male mind is so alien.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 10:57 PM
3

I have an imbalance in my neurotransmitters so I take corrective drugs. Nothing wrong with it at all Yep! We don't shame diabetics for having kidneys that don't produce the right amount of insulin, why should we shame people whose brains don't produce the right amount of dopamine or whatever? Sorry, I sometimes forget that some people didn't always have anxiety. I've always had it so it is a forign thought That's ok, I appreciate your perspective. I started feeling social anxiety when I was in m…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 10:54 PM
6

Yes. The warning was correct, but too vague to be helpful at all. Kind of like how "be yourself" is both good advice and unhelpful at the same time. They didn't tell me that boys would have sex with girls without actually liking them as a person, my mind was blown when I figured that out. If I don't like someone as a person, I lose all attraction for them. And, if I'm having sex with someone, that means that I could probably see myself in a relationship with them. It took me a while to learn men…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 10:40 PM
1

I wish the adult women in my life had been more specific instead of parroting the "boys only want one thing" line. As a hormone-driven teen, I heard that and thought "great! I want sex too, and if boys want it so much, surely having it with them will make them like me and want me to be their girlfriend!" Ah, the naivete of youth. It was and still is a hard lesson to learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 10:34 PM
3

I used to feel really guilty about "relying" on a drug, just to be a functional person. But, then someone made a comparison between mental illness and diabetes, they basically said that diabetics shouldn't feel guilty for "relying" on their insulin, so I shouldn't feel guilty, either. That really spoke to me, and now I'm comfortable with the reality that I may need to be on lexapro my entire life. My brain simply doesn't produce the right amount of certain chemicals, big deal. it's really hard t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 10:09 PM
3

Lexapro twins! It has definitely been a life saver for me! It makes me feel like I can be the person I truly am underneath all the mental illness. Without it I'm a cowardly sad sack, with it I can be confident and happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 09:56 PM
1

Pretty much true except the last part. I've been approached by female friends who were trying to get me to cheat, I could have easily gotten away with it no doubt Cheating is different, my original statement was in regard to single men looking for casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 09:31 PM
2

A short fat guy with a fat girl are a perfect match The woman would have higher SMV. Once again, it's determined by the market, not objective physical characteristics. Short = unattractive in men Fat = unattractive in both men and women So, the fat girl only has one undesirable trait, while the short fat guy has two. Therefor, he's lower on the totem pole.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 09:30 PM
1

I'm sure he'd make a pretty 5' girl very happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 09:28 PM
3

Once again from the hilltops, being thin does not make a guy above average in smv. A short thin dude and a fat girl are a perfect smv match.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 06:38 PM
1

This is the way it's supposed to be. The happiest couples are couples in which the man is two points higher in Smv than the woman. That way, the man gets to feel worshipped and the woman's hypergamy is satisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 06:37 PM
3

I'll add that us needy girls are also usually very generous with affection and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 05:34 PM
2

All men have the same basic instincts and drives. All men are also capable of reigning in these instincts or channeling them into something useful. Some of the base male instincts are: a thirst for competition, sexual variety, and social hierarchy. Men are typically more prone to tribalism and xenophobia than women. Men are also more likely to consider violence as a primary solution to problems. In terms of specific behavior: all men will lie (under the right circumstances) if it means getting t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/17 02:44 PM
2

Or "I've never enjoyed this so much with anyone else" in reference to bjs, riding dick, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:21 PM
1

Is he really? I could have sworn he was taller. I guess it's camera tricks -shrugs- Ooh that guy is pretty darn cute, still prefer Ian. I think Jared Padalecki might be my second favorite, he's super tall and dreamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 07:20 PM
3

Ian somerhaulder is my personal 10/10. He's just gorgeous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:37 PM
5

Lmao depending on how good the guy is at sexting. I'm a sucker for dirty talk. Words can be more arousing than porn, for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 06:33 PM
2

I don't claim to represent most women lol I'm one of a kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 05:20 PM
4

You definitely have the most alpha personality of anyone here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 05:18 PM
6

Love when you talk dirty
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 05:11 PM
7

lol I'm just a weirdo. I get turned on way too easily, even just from making eye contact with a guy who's my particular cup of tea.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 05:04 PM
3

Some of us do get wet around hot tall guys. But, then again, I also have a pretty masculine sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 05:02 PM
7

The vagina doesn't have all that many nerve endings, most of the feeling is in the clit and g spot. It's why putting in a tampon doesn't feel sexual (or much like anything) at all. Question: are you always aware of how much sweat is on your balls? That's how I would describe "feeling wet" lol. I'm not surprised I'm wet, I'm usually surprised by the amount of it :p
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 04:56 PM
9

"I've never felt this way before!" Haha it totally is typical ego stroking girl game.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 04:55 PM
0

It should be legalized, but I want to keep the social stigma of seeing a pro in tact. Paying for sex should remain in the realm of unattractive losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 04:38 PM
5

When I'm aroused, my clit sort of throbs/pulses and becomes really sensitive. It causes a strong desire for touch and friction on that spot. The wetness comes after, and I'm only vaguely aware of it. Sometimes I get surprised by how soaked I am, once the clothes come off. Height can definitely arouse me, if the guy in question is already my type. A cocky smirk and a wink can also send a jolt of sensation downstairs. Deep voices and certain manly scents can turn me into a wet mess. It's obvious w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 04:30 PM
2

I'd be ok with some very basic RP concepts being taught in schools. Sexual dimorphism, burden of performance, hypergamy, etc. But, they should be taught in a clinical, unbiased fashion. So basically, the parts that describe general concepts of human behavior/reproduction can stay, but the misogyny and anti-feminism have to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 10:22 PM
4

Most women don't need to exercise regularly to keep a fit body Rofl, only someone who has never lived as a woman can claim something like this. Estrogen promotes fat gain and our hormonal cycles greatly affect appetite. with a good diet And there's the rub. Most people would rather be able to eat unhealthy delicious food and then exercise it off, I know that's how I roll. But, for most women, it's like our own bodies are working against us. The female body is made to stubbornly maintain fat stor…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 07:03 PM
3

And people who are shades of grey are so much more interesting and fun to figure out :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 06:59 PM
3

Well thats because women like to see what restaurant a guy wants to go to, they like decisiveness, hint hint Agreed. But, my point still stands. No one wants an overly indecisive partner. No this more means about passions or careers or personal endeavors Way to move the goalpost. Keeping a fit body is definitely a personal endeavor, btw. Personality always bleeds into physical appearance. A girl can be a bombshell beautiful and only like drinking and getting high and tons of guys will go for her…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 06:56 PM
5

I see men complaining constantly about number 1: "why won't she just tell me what restaurant she wants to go to?!" If number 3 affects the physical appearance of the woman, few men would tolerate it. Like, if she gains a ton of weight and then "gives up on goals if they take too much time or effort", no man with options would put up with that. Number 6 also seems to annoy a lot of men. A high desire for order and planning leads to a lot of nagging about cleaning or being late.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 06:52 PM
3

Yes. All of the above are weak and unattractive, isn't this obvious? Who wants a cowardly indecisive partner that's also a stick in the mud? I doubt most men with options would LTR a woman with these traits, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 06:44 PM
1

It's hard not to be envious of people like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 05:07 PM
11

Men with enough initiative to obtain a six pack usually aren't ineffectual or lazy, the things women nag about the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 05:04 PM
1

Agreed completely. I'm not one of those women with nesting instincts who obsess over the appearance of their home and has to have things a certain way, I'm much more masculine in that regard. If I'm bringing money home and cooking for the family every day, then I'm paying someone to clean the house (and they'll probably do a better job of it than I ever could).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:54 PM
1

Vikings are pretty hot, but sadly I'm not into blondes :p
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:45 PM
1

No, there would be no sexual attraction in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:35 PM
1

I think a lot of feminists enjoy porn (I know I do, once in a while). And, with better laws and regulation, the main problems feminists had with porn disappear.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:27 PM
1

Making the first move does not guarantee you won't be pumped and dumped. In fact, it may make you appear easy and increase the chance of being pumped and dumped.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/17 03:21 PM
1

Preposterous Were men ever traded by their fathers for goats or camels? Trying to find anything of significance women have actually done or achieved on their own merits, now that would be exhausting. No one has achieved anything entirely on their own merits, only fools think so. We're all standing on the shoulders of those who came before. I see. So all that talk about improving the gene pool was a bunch of hollabaloo then? Nope. Once again, I believe individual liberty is conducive to improving…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 10:04 PM
1

The average women 2000 years ago had it infinitely better than the average man, just as they do now The average man at least got to choose his spouse and occupation. Again, everything you have was gifted onto you, by Nature and by men You're putting a lot of effort into dismissing anything women have done. That must be exhausting. a) Genetically defective women willingly remove themselves from the gene pool, which they do not. That's not necessary for natrual selection to gradually improve the g…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 09:49 PM
1

the primary reason men want money is so they can get women. You see the problem here. Hm. I guess legalizing prostitution, but taxing it and making it expensive, would be a possible solution. Biology dictates women are the protected sex, and because that, everyone bends over backwards to accommodate you No one bent over backwards for women 2000 years ago. Women were considered property. Do you bend over backwards for the chair you're sitting on? If you'd been smarter, with the natural advantages…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 09:14 PM
1

you don't really have much of anything else that interests them in the first place Money seems to be a decent motivator so far. Men like bread and circuses as much as anyone else. Women did not achieve power, it was gifted onto you by nature and biology. Being born with a vagina is hardly a skill, so much as an accident We're born with the tools, but we're not born knowing how to use them to our advantage. That has to be learned. Spies and diplomats aren't born knowing the secrets of intrigue, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:49 PM
1

Are you so entitled you do not think you have to compensate other people for services rendered? They can be compensated in other ways, but not with reproductive access. Most men, myself included, have no power at all, covert or otherwise It's completely within your control. No one is born knowing how to achieve power, whether we use overt or covert methods, it's a learned skill. If you have such concern for the human gene pool, surely you would support measures to stop these women from procreati…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 08:14 PM
1

Maybe not 100%, but you need a lot more than you might care to admit. And really, who do you think is gonna bring about automation if not men? Technologically savvy men and women working together? And, just because we may need 70-75% of men, doesn't mean they should all be entitled to reproduce. then your power is covert, but you're still the one with the power Maybe it's because women are used to having covert power, but we see overt power in a slightly envious light. We're used to the color of…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 07:50 PM
1

Then you need to convince the rest of society to give up on all the modern luxuries it currently enjoys and dispose of these biologically undesirable men The first half isn't necessary for the latter half of your statement. We don't need 100% of our male workforce anymore, the rise of automation will keep our standard of living in tact. You're the moral arbiters, and society is primarily structured around servicing your interests Perhaps. I still don't regard that as "ruling". A ruler has overt …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 07:36 PM
1

Only children and fools think otherwise Or fools who take their own freedom for granted. I agree, from a purely biological/evolutionary pov, it makes zero difference whether or not these men actually reproduce. The large majority of men who've lived throughout history never got to pass on their genes, and we did just fine And I feel the biological/evolutionary point of view is the most important. Societies rise and fall, but our DNA is our legacy. The plight of any group of people in a society i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 07:04 PM
7

And shitty friendship is also "something". Being pumped and dumped is not validating, it's quite invalidating.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:14 PM
1

No one should be forced to "bite the bullet" aka sacrifice their freedom or bodily autonomy just to keep genetically inferior men from going on violent rampages. Your "plight" is your own problem, not society's, and not women's. Everyone has problems in life, having a dry dick doesn't make you a victim, and it certainly shouldn't make you into a murderer. And if what you claim is indeed true, then it gives me even more reason to support gun control. Angry sexual failures won't be able to take th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 02:08 PM
2

Ok, replace what I said with literally any other biological difference between the sexes. Females will always have more sexual leverage, because of the way we reproduce. Wishing for a world that does not exist, and will never exist, is a waste of time. It's a pure sport and it means nothing It means you can potentially defend yourself, which obviously affects ones physical well-being.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 04:45 AM
1

I prefer 6' plus, but anything taller than me is fine. I'm currently dating a guy who's exactly 6'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 01:27 AM
1

The market was free before feminism took over Nope, that's backwards. maybe not to womens insane standards Ah, yes. The standard of wanting human rights is far too high. Or are you referring to hypergamy? Women have that instinct for a reason, even if it inconveniences genetically unfit men. because now an average guy is no longer good enough for an average woman, she demands more The average guy has never been enough. Women had their natural instincts subdued by force. The market is more free a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/17 01:25 AM
1

So if Im a 6, my SMV equal will also be a 6 SMV is not objective, it is determined by the market. Skinny men of average height are not equivalent to skinny women of average height any more than men with big boobs are equivalent to women with big boobs. Before feminism, both parties had to settle for their rough SMV equivalent The true rough SMV equivalent is determined in a free market. Before feminism, men artificially inflated their own SMV by oppressing women. Now that they can't do that anym…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 10:11 PM
1

Men with any fat on them cant get any non-obese woman, regardless of height That's just so incorrect, it's crazy. Men are the ones obsessed with bmi, not women. Women care more about height, face, and shoulder to waist ratio. Tall guys with handsome faces and a little pudge can absolutely slay hotties.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 10:08 PM
1

And my male equivalent would have an easier time lifting heavy objects. Why bother sulking repeatedly over biological realities?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 09:04 PM
1

But overweight tall guy usually beats out skinny short guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 09:03 PM
3

It used to, usually at times when I was feeling especially lonely. But, for every post/comment that makes me feel like shit, there's another that makes me think "thank goodness I'm not that dude". It all evens out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 07:56 PM
2

Why the fuck should women be forced to settle just because you're not attracted to your smv equivalent?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 07:54 PM
2

Women don't value a thin body like men do. Being thin as a woman automatically makes you hot (most of the time), not so for a man. Women tend to value height, not weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 07:43 PM
2

It's almost like men and women value different physical traits
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 07:39 PM
4

Or, the fat girl is his true smv equivalent.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/17 12:56 PM
2

More like she perceives the man as being hot enough to override the intimidation factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/17 01:36 PM
2

There's a theory that exposure to certain levels of hormones in the womb might affect how the brain is "gendered".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 09:18 PM
1

Behavior conducive to the acts of protecting and/or destroying, increased by the presence of testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 09:15 PM
8

Sexism, stupidity, cowardice, and whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 02:31 PM
4

Would you say the same about men who fantasize about threesomes? Also, mfm does not always mean double penetration.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 01:52 PM
3

Is this really a masculine behavior when women write pages and pages of erotic fanfiction, thereby imagining sex with hot guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 03:56 AM
3

Maybe they moisturize more?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 09:05 PM
8

Anything possibly involving fecal matter is permanently off the table for me. The younger generation of men have been ruined by porn, but thankfully there are plenty of hot older guys who don't base their self worth off a porn-inspired checklist. I've also noticed younger dudes are using gross/uncomfortable sex acts to determine how invested their girlfriends are. "You'd do anal on a unicycle while my grandma watches if you really loved me! I bet you'd do that for your ex!" I guess since they ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 08:18 PM
2

It was inherently about rejecting the power of the feminine Interesting, albeit in a sad way. Men seem to be inherently fearful and envious of the "power of the feminine". Especially the one power they envy the most: the ability to have sex whenever one wishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 08:11 PM
1

Basically, it's now a crime for a man to be unattractive Can't wait for this law to be on the books.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/17 08:03 PM
2

Think of the designated areas like proving grounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 09:54 PM
3

Women don't enjoy death That's because women create life. All of the minute differences in how we treat/perceive death come down to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 08:56 PM
1

In accepted social environments, when the person's body language appears open, or when socialization is just necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 08:50 PM
1

prefer that approaching take place only in safe spaces , like bars/clubs, friend group or online I know I do. Just keep the sexual marketplace where it belongs.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 08:46 PM
5

Claiming male sexuality is inherently rude sounds like actual misandry to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 08:40 PM
1

Chads don't get heartbroken, they can just spend ten minutes on tinder and feel better. Less attractive males only feel heartbreak over the loss of regular sex, not the loss of any particular woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/17 03:56 PM
1

All of my one night stands have been futile attempts to start a relationship. I've never been interested in flings just for the sake of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 05:55 PM
3

Women's bodies are biologically predisposed to store fat easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/17 05:49 PM
2

The same way men judge femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 12:16 AM
2

Nope, men have a social hierarchy Sure, but men seem to be impressed by the ability to get laid, so attractive men are often high up in the hierarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/17 12:00 AM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:54 PM
2

Women decide who is manly and attractive, not (straight) men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:49 PM
2

Women create AND incubate the child. It's called reproduction because it involves copying DNA sequences, that doesn't mean it's not also creation. Men are the primary creators and inventors and producers in the world Men are builders, not creators. They use the building blocks available in the world, but they didn't create those blocks. Men can never truly create, that's why they've always feared and tried to control women's creative powers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:43 PM
3

Since without sperm no female can procreate, does every male become the ultimate creater? No, women are the ultimate creators. Men donate a single ingredient, while the woman's body does the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:31 PM
2

The egg cells are more durable than sperm cells.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:30 PM
3

If sperm were actually the "genesis of life", they would be much more valuable and durable (like the actual genesis of life).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:11 PM
1

Agreed, and an interesting experiment to boot.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:10 PM
3

Didn't Albert Einstein find the general theory of relativity He discovered relativity, he did not create it. What are the rules to define creation? In my opinion, using very little (or almost nothing) to form something completely different and on a much grander scale. Like, taking two cells and creating a human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:10 PM
6

When you live in a liberal part of the country, most people are feminists. So, finding a masculine feminist is as simple as finding a masculine man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:05 PM
3

The egg is much more valuable, sperm is regularly being made and disposed of. Plus, sperm cells have a very short shelf life, whereas eggs can last for decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:01 PM
2

Inventing is not the same thing as creating. Inventors use things that are already in existence to discover new technologies, they are not inventing things out of thin air.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 11:00 PM
2

That is not creating, that is innovating. Show me a man that has ever created another human life within their own body.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 10:57 PM
1

Oh really? Nuclear bombs are the best destroyers, but the only things they create are craters and radiation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 10:56 PM
7

How are men the creators, not women? Women literally create life. Maybe a better word for men would be innovators. I do agree that men are definitely the primary destroyers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 08:44 PM
1

6 foot minimum for online dating, 5'10 IRL.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/17 07:26 PM
2

Yep. At least 5'10, which is a couple inches taller than myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/17 07:50 PM
–

I don't know what sex with you is like, but sex is supposed to be much more pleasurable and exciting than a dental procedure.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 04:03 PM
7

Enthusiasm is important, it means no one is being coerced or doing something they're not excited about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 01:19 AM
15

Lol you don't have to ask for consent in an unsexy supplicating way. Getting consent is just part of dirty talk, I can think of dozens of ways to ask a girl if she wants your dick inside her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/17 01:16 AM
1

Ok, so let's write a contract that doesn't fuck over half the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 11:55 PM
13

A man can be respectful and ask for consent, and then also be thoroughly dominant after receiving said consent. That's how hot feminists fuck, yo.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 11:44 PM
1

So the first question for you is do you think they are even capable? If not, then nothing to worry about - ignore them all you want. I don't think they're capable of anything on a grand scale, not at this point in time. And this is the one of the two factors you mentioned that we can most prevent. Keep the military and police on our side, enforce stricter gun laws, and they'll be powerless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 11:35 PM
1

Very cool, I've never heard of Asherah. So, the snake would represent missionaries of the Asherah cult, tempting people to "take from the tree of life"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 11:30 PM
1

if someone theoretically lets me do whatever i want but takes 3/4 of whatever result i make they are infringing on me as a person regardless if they dont even as much as touch me Maybe for materialistic people. You meant women? No. The only way the average man won't want sex is if it's with another man. women must give them children for the greater good ofc (and no, not chads children like today) Lol. I might agree with pregnancy taxes, but only if the children are sired by Chads, and the mother…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 09:14 PM
1

Your wallet is not an extension of your person, simply because you worked for it. Would you consider your car an extension of your person-hood, since you bought it? Your body is your person, not your possessions. Crimes that affect a person's physical being are far worse in my opinion. So, I consider theft a petty crime (especially if the victim still has means enough to live off after being stolen from). Now imagine women were institutionally forced to fuck men they dont wanna fuck. I think we …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 07:45 PM
4

Shared patterns of behavior. For example: different groups of orca whales have different cultures, but no one would say they have societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 06:13 PM
3

Culture does not equal society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 05:35 PM
7

God, thank you. I'm so sick of the moralizing "but muh society!" Society is an illusion, stability is an illusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 04:51 PM
1

Anyone who thinks playing devils advocate for the return of the subjugation of half the population isn't worth taking seriously. Technically slavery was "good" for the stability of southern society, but that doesn't mean it was a decent practice. It's important to compromise between what keeps a society "stable" and what protects the freedoms and liberties of the society's citizens. From my perspective, and the perspective of most westerners, personal freedom/bodily autonomy is more important th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 04:46 PM
1

Oh I'm aware it's what I did :) When you realize your opponent holds ridiculous views it's easy to feel like you've already won. Not vaccinating your kids puts other kids lives in danger, same with traffic laws. But you're free to homeschool your unvaccinated children while not driving a car on public roads. You're free to have a messy yard or be an addict or neglect your kids (to a point). This shit is common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 03:49 PM
1

Turning his physical strength against me or my possessions, having an emotional affair with another woman, talking shit about me with other people, being dismissive of my feelings and needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 03:32 PM
0

I find homophobia to be bigoted. Sorry the word bigot triggers you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 03:19 PM
1

Average men should have average standards. But, they can dream all they want about their ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 03:09 PM
2

Wrong, the apple represents human intellect and knowledge. Adam was content with a life of ignorant bliss, Eve was not. Eve is a metaphor for human curiosity and the thirst for understanding, which admittedly can get people into trouble. The garden of eden myth is a warning written by people in power, the lesson being that only the wicked question the status quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 03:05 PM
1

Biological attraction ques are not self imposed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 03:02 PM
2

Exactly. Attractive men who can get the real thing will continue to do so. All we have to do is keep sex bots in the realm of Smv/societal losers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 03:01 PM
0

Bigots and libertarians have the freedom to move to countries without taxes or basic rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 02:55 PM
1

Wow, that's a lot of hyperbole you've got there! The only logical equivalent of rape for women is also rape for men. Your wallet is not an extension of your person. And, people who pay taxes get plenty in return: roads, police, firefighters, clean water. To say they receive nothing is pretty retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 02:55 PM
2

Because, to give them motivation would mean taking away the freedom and liberty of half the population. As I said before, individual freedom is more important than the illusion of "stability".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/17 02:50 PM
1

The 80/20 rule, male disposability, and the "women are wonderful effect" only exist because women are the ones that get pregnant. If men were the only sex capable of producing more humans, society would give much more of a fuck about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 05:46 PM
0

That's entirely irrelevant. A person who pays taxes still has complete control over the direction of their life and they can still pursue individual happiness. They lose control of a minority of their finances in exchange for public services. And it's mostly irrelevant because bodily autonomy and personal finances are two very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 05:08 PM
6

Individual freedom > societal "stability" Why should half of the population entirely give up their happiness and self determination just so a few genetically unfit men can have motivation in their lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/17 01:28 PM
1

Natural selection and genetic engineering will greatly reduce the amount of incels in future generations. And, in the far future we might be able to implant brains/consciousness into better looking bodies grown through stem cells. But, only the wealthy incels would likely be able to afford that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 05:06 PM
1

A combination of "ew he's weak" and "ew I'm fat". Total turn-off.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/17 02:38 AM
2

So I'm super submissive and I like passionate animalistic sex, lol. Accurate. 96% Submissive 94% Rope bunny 91% Primal (Prey) 68% Pet 57% Girl/Boy 56% Vanilla 54% Slave 40% Brat 37% Ageplayer 34% Degradee 26% Masochist 19% Experimentalist 18% Primal (Hunter) 18% Non-monogamist 14% Rigger 13% Exhibitionist 9% Voyeur Everything else was less less than 9%
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 08:24 PM
1

Ahaha yes a lovely shade of violet or indigo
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 07:07 PM
2

I agree, when we're referring to the modern regulated economic market, with food stamps and homeless shelters. But, in a truly free market, the people who fail don't get taken care of, they just die in the streets. A free sexual market does not result in death, only loneliness and frustration. I care more about taking care of people's physical (legitimate) needs before their personal needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 07:02 PM
5

You don't have to get "mutalated" (it's mutilated btw), you could just throw a dress and some makeup on. The trick is finding a dress to match your lazy, entitled, and self-defeatist attitudes :)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 07:00 PM
5

But then you'd have something new to complain about, at least. And, you'd escape the burden of performance.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 06:53 PM
5

Consequence of not doing well in a free sexual market: no sex :( Consequence of not doing well in a free economic market: DEATH I think it's obvious why liberals (and people in general) care about one and not the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 06:47 PM
7

You could always get gender reassignment surgery if you hate being a man so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 06:44 PM
34

No one is forcing men to do anything. If you don't want to adhere to masculine ideals, the police aren't going to show up at your door to throw you in jail, you just won't get as much sexual opportunity. but it's a problem to say you want a woman that's under 30, not a slut, not a single mother, not fat or overweight, who's attractive, knows how to cook, clean and not nag, and fucks you more than once a month Attractive men can and do have standards like these, and no one bats an eye. But, low v…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/17 05:38 PM
2

Because, people only care about your social skills after you've passed their attractiveness threshold.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 03:23 PM
3

Or, women should only be with partners they're truly attracted to. When I'm with a man I have serious chemistry with, I want sex constantly, multiple times a day. Women shouldn't have to talk themselves into doing something that's meant to be mutually pleasurable. If a husband wants sex regularly, he should make himself as sexually attractive as possible, not guilt his wife into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/17 03:09 PM
1

Clearly the most feminine number, lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 10:06 PM
3

And the ones who have strong preferences for not leading are more likely to be dependent and/or indecisive. For exmaple: I hate the pressure of leading, I hate even being the first one to walk into a room. I have a shy, dependent personality. So, in relationships I take the submissive role. Someone with a polar-opposite personality would probably hate being submissive and gravitate toward a leadership position.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 09:58 PM
3

I agree. However, a person who is dependent or indecisive is MORE LIKELY to be happy to take on a submissive role in their relationships. They would be very unhappy in a dominant role. So, the majority of people who actively prefer to be submissive are more likely to have one or more of those personality traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 09:44 PM
3

It's in the very definitions of the words! Someone who is dependent will prefer to depend on someone else, someone who is indecisive will prefer for someone else to make decisions for them. This is common sense and requires no source. Do you really think a dependent/indecisive person is going to be more likely to take on a dominant role?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 09:38 PM
2

All I'm saying is a person who is dependent and indecisive is going to be more likely to be the submissive one in a relationship, because they're not comfortable with leading.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 09:22 PM
6

But submissive women ARE much more likely to be needy, indecisive, and dependent. I'll agree that intelligence has nothing to do with it, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 09:14 PM
5

Age 23 Pill color Purple "Femininity score" 69, ohhh yeah!! MBTI type Either INTP or INFP Do you think you'd have an easier time if you were more/less feminine? I know for a fact I'd have an easier time finding a boyfriend if I were less masculine in my sex drive Which aspects of your personality are most feminine? I'm very clingy/needy and affectionate with my romantic partner. I don't get jealous or worried when he does his own thing, but I'm likely to be constantly hanging on his arm whenever…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 09:00 PM
1

"Real men" aka men with options will probably be less likely to put up with bad behavior, but they would still tolerate more shit coming from a beautiful girl than an ugly one. Regardless, men still participate in the behaviors I mentioned. All men will sexually use and dispose of women, if given the opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 04:31 PM
1

Are you saying men DON'T put up with bad behavior from hot girls or dispose people they have no further use of?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 04:07 PM
1

Lol, being attracted to someone because of a physical trait is not "using them". Are men using pretty or thin girls because they wouldn't be into them if they were ugly or fat? And no, I don't feel entitled to commitment. I do feel entitled to honesty and decency.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 04:04 PM
3

They only pay attention to how hot a guy regardless of how abrasive or a shitty human being he is Yep, men do this too til he is disposed off and tossed aside as soon as he's served his use And this
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/17 12:43 AM
6

That men will always prioritize their dick-feels over morality, that as a woman you're forced into a "goalie" type role in sexual relations, that your sexuality is viewed as a commodity separate from your humanity, and that the men who want to use you are very good at pretending to have decent, romantic intentions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 10:08 PM
1

Whether they are controllable or not is irrelevant to attraction. The traits women find attractive are generally genetic and unchangeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/17 09:36 PM
1

Why, you can make that happen :D I don't think Pewdiepie appreciates fans sneaking into his bedroom to watch him fuck his girlfriend. So you won't suck one guy off while the other guy pounds you? Well that's an entirely different story! I wouldn't qualify that as dp.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/17 03:15 AM
1

are you against watching them fuck while you fangirl all over them? :D Not at all, that would almost be an honor lol. You can do DP? Noooo. This is pure male fantasy, I can hardly believe there's a woman in existence who enjoys that. For me it's vagina only, the dudes can take turns :P
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/17 03:02 AM
1

You don't have to get between their love, you just need to get between their sheets It would just end up with them fucking and me watching while cheering them on. I can't fangirl and get busy at the same time, priorities, man! You never wanted to do a threesome? An mfm? Of course. An mff? Only if I were highly inebriated.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/17 02:56 AM
1

What's stopping you from fucking him, then?! I ship him with his beautiful girlfriend. I would never get between their love, lol. Fine. I'll tell all of the bros to dye our hair black so we can get fucked by you. So.. when you bringing that tight ass to Sweden? As soon as I meet a cute swedish dude here in the US who is willing to pay for a plane trip, that'll happen :P
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/17 02:45 AM
1

Felix doesn't look feminine or muscular in a gay way. I just find Pewdiepie handsome; he has nice hair, eyes, and jawline. I wanted to fuck him before he had even 1000 subscribers, so it's not the status. Eh, no thank you to that dude. I know a lot of other chicks might find him hot, but natural hair that light is just unmasculine to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/17 02:40 AM
1

Pewdiepie and the dude who plays Thor are the only blonde guys I'd fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/17 02:32 AM
1

Yeah, his hair is too light for me. I like dark brown/black. Also, I haven't heard Basshunter in years, thanks for that lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/17 02:27 AM
1

Scandinavian men are pretty hot, but I don't really like light hair. Well, I have all of those qualities, except I don't think my face is perfect.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 11:30 PM
1

I hang out with a variety of people, from ugly to gorgeous. But, I'm not referring to my social circle, I'm referring to the entire country. 80% of men are either short, or fat, or both.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 11:00 PM
1

I agree, sex should only happen when both parties are enthusiastic about having it. Sadly, the majority of men are low smv.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 10:50 PM
3

I'm aware that places without an obesity epidemic will have different standards. It's just funny that men will call overweight women "trash", yet will still devote their time and money to putting their dicks inside said trash. If you can only fuck trash, you're probably trash.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 10:48 PM
3

More like males will take what they can get, and the local definition of attractive adapts to the average.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 10:02 PM
1

Friends with benefits only works when both parties agree they would never ever under any circumstances want to be in a relationship with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 03:37 PM
3

My statement applies only to the US. Being slim here is absolutely enough to put a woman in the top percentage of attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 03:31 PM
3

Natural behaviors that don't directly hurt or violate the rights of other people are moral in my book.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 02:03 AM
3

If the sources of advice are not misogynistic, then I probably wouldn't care all that much. I might find it sort of cringey, but it wouldn't kill all attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 02:01 AM
1

Yes and yes. When the average person is overweight, the sexual marketplace adjusts. Guys can dream about slim girls all they want, but unless they're very attractive themselves, they're going to be dreaming for a long time. A guy who's technically in shape, but short and balding, shouldn't be surprised that his smv equal is an overweight girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/17 01:55 AM
2

This is why I'm purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/17 06:18 PM
2

Thanks, Cxj :) If I do I'll probably be less of a bitch on here, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 11:11 PM
2

He was in rock bands, nuff said. lol He still is in one, they just toured in a bunch of cities in California. The good "players" make everything feel good and safe, thats why they're good Truth good sign he's looking for an LTR with you I hope so! He never pressured me physically, I had to do most of the sexual escalation, haha. He said he expected to woo me and show his credentials first, but he was glad that it happened. He's a sex pos feminist, so I highly doubt he'd judge me negatively for w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 11:02 PM
8

Red pillers are the ones claiming that logic and emotion are at odds. So, if they want their logic to be taken seriously, they should control their anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 09:06 PM
2

Thanks! Oh, you know I'm too horny for the RPW way :P Luckily, the guy hasn't given off any player vibes. The opposite, in fact. He's been very sweet and boyfriendy so far. But, he definitely could be a player if he wanted to. I imagine he must have had tons of sex when he was younger. Like, he's hot now, but damn he looks gorgeous in his older facebook pics. Too bad I was like 12 when he was in his physical prime, rofl.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:30 PM
3

Very well :) We finally had sex, and it was great! I think on our next date I'll casually mention that I'm not seeing anyone else, and gauge his response from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 08:08 PM
1

But I do think with time most men can allow themselves to fully love another woman And I think women can do the same thing. with no regard for how they make you feel or your opinion of them But how do you know you love something or someone without feeling love? There is no objective logical love, love is an emotion. I can appreciate and accept someone in a holistic sense, but without emotion there is no love. Women don't truly love anything, there's no need, it doesn't matter to them Of course w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 06:42 PM
1

The biggest implication for men is that they'll never have a woman's 'full love' if she's been alpha widowed A man who's still pining over his ex can never give another woman his full love, either. women don't truly love the man himself What does it mean to truly love a person for himself or herself? The way a mother loves a child? For women it means choosing your first serious guy is very very very important. If she chooses well and plays him right she'll have the best relationship possible, if…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 06:25 PM
1

Victims of their own genetics, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 06:07 PM
1

Men may pine for their first love always, but it's not the same as an alpha widow What's the big difference between the two? Is it that men typically don't resent their current partner for not being their ideal? Right now it just sounds like team-man hamstering, like men are capable of bouncing back after heartbreak, but women can't, because reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:55 PM
1

Anytime, baby ;) pop that pretty question and I'll make you part of my bb harem lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:21 PM
1

The existence of female alphas is irrelevant. Men often experience oneitis, and statistically have more difficulty moving on after a breakup. Men definitely do give into women, especially when they're committed. The more time they've invested, the harder they're "widowed". Does alpha widowhood only occur when the woman was/is in love? Some red pillers claim women can be alpha widowed from ons. Lol I am happy, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 05:12 PM
1

I've just never observed this phenomenon as gendered. Plenty of people have a "one that got away", but they're also perfectly capable of letting go of the past once they meet someone better. Why do you believe this is something that only happens to women? I thought I was alpha widowed a year ago, but now I have someone new and I can't even remember the past alpha's name lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:49 PM
5

Come on man, girls want hot guys. Why should a hot girl settle for an ugly dude? Especially when she can have sex with men she's attracted to whenever she wants? The two options an unattractive man has are: become attactive enough for attractive women, or learn to be attracted to girls he can attain. The good news is: male sexuality is adaptive. Increased desperation increases the number of people you find sexually attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:35 PM
1

Women don't "lose parts of themselves", they just get their heart broken. We're humans, not pieces of tape that lose their stickiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:29 PM
5

Is a sports fan shamelessly attacking the rival team while promoting the success of their preferred team hypocritical? As for why I do it, it's fun, and I want the female imperative to succeed :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:26 PM
4

Accept your shitty DNA, try to optimize and improve your physical appearance, and then eventually settle for someone equally as unappealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:23 PM
3

It's a lot more satisfying than debating. It's certainly why I'm still here :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:20 PM
2

He's short, which is pretty much synonymous with ugly. Short guys and fat women belong together, they're both the bottom of the barrel in their gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 04:12 PM
1

One can desire sex and also desire resources/commitment simultaneously.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:29 AM
1

Men should lie about sleeping with prostitutes, women should lie about being sluts. Then everyone can be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:26 AM
3

It makes zero difference for your ability to love her and be loyal, but she will not feel that is true because that's not how she works Or, maybe she realizes men are only as loyal as their options. And, if her man considered prostitutes an option, there's nothing to stop him from seeing them in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:25 AM
2

And until slut shaming attitudes die out, women should also continue to lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:22 AM
1

23 female. Piv: 12 Handjobs/blowjobs: Probably the same as the above, give or take The appropriate n-count for me personally is anything greater than 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 03:20 AM
1

Boo hoo. Supply and demand will always be a factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 02:52 AM
1

It's a difficult situation, because they need men to play along, but men are also the ones they're trying to protect themselves from You're one of the few men to understand a bit of what it's like to be a woman, at a basic level. I agree so much with this comment, except for your repetitious use of "inferior". You only need to say women are physically weaker once, we get it, we know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 02:48 AM
2

TRPers don't really change, they're typically still as desperate for validation and pathologically insecure as they were pre-pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/17 04:32 AM
1

She'll never get over him, and this is related to women and their soulmate desire, that first true alpha love is her soulmate But, what if she finds another alpha of equal, or even greater, quality?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 11:48 PM
3

You think the porn is your ally, but you merely adopted the facial. I was born into it, molded by it, and by the time I had sex with a girl it was nothing but unarousing to me! Lmao, please go on. The original point we are replying to is that women's standards for "some" may be higher than they realize and are unrealistic, real life doesn't measure up And men and women's standards for "some" romance may be naturally dissimilar. those things were tried because the guy at that time was worth the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 11:27 PM
5

When was the last time you took a dick in your anus or tried to wash cum out of your hair? :p That shit isn't easy. And no one is asking men to literally become McCaunaghey, they're just asking for some romance and happiness in their lives. I think most girls try stupid shit once or twice when they're teenagers, and then wisely decide to never do it again. It has nothing to do with the quality of the man they're with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 06:59 PM
7

And men probably watch porn and think "something's missing" because their wife won't do facials or anal. Then they cheat with a prostitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/17 02:52 PM
2

Religion is a human need. If religion were a need like water is a need, then I should be long dead :P Community and purpose are human needs, religion occasionally does a good job in providing those. At best I think our genetics affects our hormones which affects personality traits True. But, I think brain chemistry has a large affect on behavior, as well. The way the brain and body interacts with hormones could be genetic, We know a lot of mental illness is linked to DNA. And even if someone has…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 09:21 PM
2

Its like saying children should grow up deciding if they want the religious or not Uh, that's definitely how I feel about it. I find indoctrination of young children very distasteful. Why not let them discover their spirituality on their own once their brain is fully formed? Because, then we'd have a lot more atheists/agnostics, and theists wouldn't like that ;p And then throw in that there's no real self, our self is not static, and just because you're someway now doesn't make you not you if yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 08:59 PM
3

A hyperbolic hypothetical does not a straw man make. People who are married to each other don't treat each other this way I wish that were true. It's the reason marital rape laws exist in the first place, some assholes do force themselves on their spouses. If you and your wife have a good marriage and respect for each other's bodies, then this law isn't about you. Second, the husband can just push her away and tell her "no" I know. But, let's say he couldn't. Let's say he's too inebriated or exh…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 08:21 PM
2

Yeah you can be anything you want! But the entire other gender for the most part will viscerally feel like you're not a healthy and eligible member of their species for procreation. It's up to individual men to decide what they prioritize: being true to themselves, or having reproductive success.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 08:17 PM
3

A marriage is much more than legal formality. Only if you're religious. Or at least it should be. Why? It's a right to oral and vaginal, not anal Ok. What if the wife forces her unwashed, unshaven, bleeding vag onto her husband's face every time he lays down? Does she have the right to do that? Does the husband have a right to say no to that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 08:12 PM
2

It's a relationship between a man and a woman, but it isn't marriage And a marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman, just with more legal formality. "Right to sex" does not include anal sex. It does not include aberrant, deviant sexual conduct such as sodomy or pegging Ok, so it's only the right to vanilla Jesus-approved sex. How convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 08:09 PM
3

Beyond that, it really doesn't require a definition I believe it does. Please provide one. A woman who believes in marital rape does not believe in marriage How the fuck do you reach this conclusion? Marital rape is the same as any other type of rape. I could be married to the most amazing, Chadliest thundercock in the world, and be 100% head over heels in love, but if he puts his dick in my ass after I firmly say "no", then that's rape. People have hard limits, even for the ones they love. Why …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 08:04 PM
1

We'd still reproduce, but we'd resent each other and not cooperate as well. White lies are conducive for cooperation and harmony between the genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 08:02 PM
1

Honestly, I don't really mind the message, it's mostly the over the top wording and generalizations that amuse me I have a feeling a lot of the women on PPD are mirroring the hyperbolic language of the red pill, partly to make a point, and partly because it's amusing. I know that's the case for me, personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:59 PM
2

Perhaps it began that way in the first wave, but in its modern incarnation feminism has a societal focus. "No 'marital rape'" != 'husband can do whatever he wants sexually with his wife' Then what does it mean to you? That the husband has a right to vanilla missionary in the dark regardless of whether the wife has consented?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:56 PM
1

Feminism uses public apparatuses and policy to reshape the personal No, feminism seeks to reshape society. It can trickle down into the personal realm, but it's primarily concerned with societal attitudes. It does very much demand that men sacrifice theirs And which preferences are these? I don't think feminism demands anything. It may discourage certain actions, but it doesn't seek to make them illegal. I'm not going to address the last paragraph because it's ridiculous and not anywhere close t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:51 PM
8

All the issues you mentioned leak into the public sphere. My point is that feminism does not demand that you sacrifice your personal romantic preferences at its altar. Also, I'm not sure why you put marital rape in quotation marks. If your wife insisted on penetrating your ass with a huge spiky dildo every time you slept, would that be kosher, since you're married?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:25 PM
6

Feminism is concerned with gender equality in the public sphere, while allowing individuals the freedom to conduct their private lives on their own terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:07 PM
1

If we all tell each other 100% of the ugly truth, we'll all be bitter and no one will want to want to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 07:04 PM
1

Wow, women are so horrible for disliking unwanted attention and desiring a good partner. /s Do women really have so much casual disdain for the unsuccessful men? It's not just women, most people in general find unsuccessful and weak men worthy of contempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 05:22 PM
1

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Also, you never answered my question: Should men disclose to their girlfriends how many times they've masturbated to other women or fantasized about other women during the relationship? It would allow their partner to make an informed decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 05:08 PM
1

I think she's pretty hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 05:00 PM
1

But, those are completely different actions. Once again, cheating is wrong, but lying about cheating is a moral grey area.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 04:57 PM
1

Cheating is always wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 04:50 PM
1

It depends on the amount of candy ;p But, In all seriousness, I'd probably be pleased that he remembered my favorite candy. And I'd eat it while cuddling him :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/17 03:33 AM
1

Most desirable: zoologist/biologist, musician, vet, artist, college professor Least desirable: unemployed, fast food worker, sanitation worker, police, military, butcher, oil rig worker, miner
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 06:10 PM
1

You may not be hurting them at that very second but likely so at a later point That's assuming they actually give a shit about partner count, and that they magically find out at some later date.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 06:00 PM
1

No sorry they should be truthful and let him make an informed decision to dump them Should men also disclose to their girlfriends how many times they've masturbated to other women or fantasized about other women during the relationship? It would allow their partner to make an informed decision. Lying to him is a selfish act Yeah, and? Why is doing what's best for yourself automatically immoral? It's like hiding the fact you cheated to not hurt him Nah. Cheating would be the wrongful act, lying a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 05:59 PM
2

Why is lying to someone you love seen as a greater sin than intentionally hurting someone you love? If you know a piece of information could harm them or their happiness would it not be a mercy to withhold it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 04:55 AM
4

But the question remains why would she lie blatantly to a man she supposedly loves and cherishes enough to marry? Because she loses nothing by doing so? Being a liar is infinitely worse that being a slut This is not the standard opinion. Whether people admit it or not, we all prefer to be told white lies. We like hearing what we want to hear, and convincing ourselves it's the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/17 04:47 AM
3

If she's hot, we find her attractive despite her toxicity That's exactly how women work, too. If toxicity alone were hot, then incels would be swimming in pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 02:14 AM
2

You're free to do whatever you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/17 02:13 AM
1

Ok, the mrm does a good job of pretending to care about legitimate issues, while really just using those issues as an excuse to hate women and whine about not getting enough sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/17 05:39 PM
1

They're all misogynistic groups that boil down to the same complaint: "we're not getting enough sex!"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/17 04:27 PM
2

then "physical" differences are all there are to us Sure, but some physical differences are more of a huge deal than others. People who are darker have different chemical makeup to their anatomies Sickle cell comes from a particular gene, one that happens to be more prominent in African populations. However, a person who otherwise appears white/caucasian could still have the sickle cell gene.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/17 03:27 AM
5

Biologically, race is just a phenotype. A person can have mostly European genes, and still have a dark skin tone. There are biological differences between human groups Petty physical differences, only skin deep. Men and women have completely different hormonal cocktails brewing in their bodies, different instincts, different responses to external stimuli.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 09:40 PM
3

This doesn't work, because biological sex literally affects the way the brain works, while race/ethnicity does not. Sex is a biological reality, race is a social construct. So, people with male brains are going to have more behaviors in common than people of the same race. Black people are not predisposed to theft, but most all human males are predisposed to aggressively pursue reproductive opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 08:01 PM
1

20
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 05:36 PM
1

23 f. Probably around 6 months when single, or a couple days within a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 05:35 PM
1

Yep. Hypergamy is inconvenient for women, too. Sometimes I wish I could be attracted to 80% of the opposite sex (like men are), then it'd be so easy to find a boyfriend and be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 04:54 PM
1

But, most men will still be attracted to whoever they settle for.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/17 04:45 PM
2

I'd say that many women encourage so-called "toxic masculinity" by fucking hot but toxic guys But you said yourself, it's not the toxicity they're rewarding, it's the hotness.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 11:45 PM
1

Yes, it is. Are you ignorant of all statistics, or what? Really? Damn. No, not really. Sarcasm is a thing. Can you play the tiniest of violins with your huge hands? I sure can, thanks for asking. Why would you be here if you were.. Even hot blonde girls get bored. We're not all carbon copies of each other with the same interests, you know? The bruises my dick can leave on a chick's asshole are even more cute Sure, but you still had to "pretend to be nice" to convince the chick to tolerate your d…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 07:49 PM
1

No, that's the majority of women. I have never seen an overweight woman. I did see one overweight man, once. I took a picture of him because I had never seen such a thing. Dude, the place you live is not the norm lol. Ah, I see. A man needs to be 7 feet tall to get that pussy wet. :( Oh yeah. You literally need to be Andre the giant :P I want to treat women like shit but so far I have to pretend to be nice to get anywhere A tragedy for the ages. I'm playing the tiniest of violins for you. Maybe …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 07:38 PM
1

So every man now under 6 feet is short? Awesome To me personally as a tall-ish woman, it is. But, 5'10 would still be tall to a woman 5'5 or below. That means that only 14% of all of the men in the states are real men Yep. And young non-overweight women are also a small percentage of the population. Must suck to be pumped and dumped by all of those 6 feet tall dudes :/ Must suck to not be able to pump and dump :p Does that mean that most guys are being used by women? They're in relationships. Ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 06:30 PM
1

Chicks here be saying that only men who are 6 feet tall + are real men, that the rest of us are shrimps and that we aren't real men, but we should be fighting to impress the chicks who hate us? I don't care what unattractive (ie short) men do. They definitely don't need to waste their time attempting to impress chicks, lol. When people talk about "men" or "women" in general, they're usually only referring to sexually attractive members of that sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 06:13 PM
2

Or the men are just little bitches who are only capable of video game violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/17 05:36 PM
2

Most men aren't soldiers, most men these days can't even handle a fist fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 10:53 PM
2

Because anal sex is disgusting and it hurts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/17 04:56 PM
1

the concept that looks/genetic quality is the basis of all sexual attraction I definitely agree with this part. The entire purpose of attraction ques and sex pheromones are to help us identify the most biologically fit mates. it doesnt matter what you say or how you act as long as you signify good genetic quality However, I disagree with this specific statement. Behavior can also signify poor genetic quality, and if the behavior is unattractive enough, it can complete negate any previous attract…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 11:22 PM
2

If he bought it specifically for her, and then reused it on me, I would be very hurt and disappointed. But, if the ring was an heirloom or something he owned before even meeting his previous fiance, I would be ok with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/17 11:18 PM
1

Helps the wide spread of STDs Which can be prevented by condoms. Contributes to "Broken Families" So, would you be in favor of bringing back shotgun weddings? Helps make Abortion more normalized because more promiscuous sex == more unwanted babies. And we can see the rise in promiscuity and abortions rates in America over the last 100 years Why is normalizing a common medical procedure a problem? Do you view abortion in general as immoral? Data has actually shown that making birth control more w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 08:12 PM
2

There is the religious reason, namely "this is bad, because god said so". Or the sour grapes reason: "this is bad, because I can't have it". I think every other argument against promiscuity ultimately boils down to conservative religion (which impacts cultural ideas about sexuality) and personal resentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 06:28 PM
6

Owning slaves, stealing, being an ass hole or a selfish prick..These are things that hurt people. How does two grown ass adults having consensual sex hurt anyone? Why do you view promiscuous behavior as "bad"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/17 05:12 AM
1

The effect on their partner is the same I disagree. I think most people consider cheating to be far more emotionally painful than breaking up the normal way.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/17 09:37 PM
1

Cheating happens within a committed relationship. If you break off the commitment first, there's no cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 05:43 PM
3

Yes. Way too many times. I'm into nerdy hobbies, so I have a good amount of male friends and acquaintances. Every so often, someone will randomly come out and say they like me and that I should give them a chance. Meanwhile, I never even viewed them as a sexual prospect. Why did you feel that way? They just weren't my type, they were unattractive to me. Were you caught off guard by his behavior? Of course. At first I naively thought we were purely platonic friends. I do still believe men and wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/17 02:17 AM
1

That's a lot more ethical than cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 05:48 PM
1

That's a lot more ethical than cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 05:48 PM
2

That's a lot more ethical than cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 05:48 PM
1

Are there other hobbies you like more? Art related perhaps? Yes, art related abilities are much more impressive to me personally. Musicians are especially hot. Anything in particular that makes them difficult to keep around? Just that they have a lot of options, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 04:33 AM
3

Smart and handsome, without a doubt. Capability is learned, whereas beauty and intelligence are mostly genetic. The handy-man shtick doesn't impress me, honestly it reeks of low class. I'd rather be with a man who can afford to pay other people to fix his stuff. Is there another attribute you'd prefer over the mentioned three? Like what some of other comments have said, the ability to make me laugh is pretty important. How difficult is it to find a guy with those two attributes in your society? …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 03:41 AM
1

If you're physically attractive, then you're alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 05:25 PM
2

Working sucks, I'd much rather have my man make the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/17 05:17 PM
6

I've definitely seen people (of both sexes) look like that when they're zoning out or just not ready for a picture to be taken. Do these women just perpetually have that look? Do their eyes ever come back into focus? lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 11:04 PM
5

The "thousand cock state" literally makes no sense. Everyone looks like that when they're not focusing on the camera lense while their picture is being taken.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 09:35 PM
1

Men who don't have their shit together, are clingy, lack friends, have minor mental illnesses, are messy, or have a dad bod.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 04:09 PM
2

That's because the average woman has a higher smv than the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/17 04:01 PM
3

Mostly to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 11:41 PM
1

I have a high libido so I'm kinda slutty, I only shave my legs when the public is going to see them, I'm unambitious and lazy, I'm a socially anxious homebody, I stay in pjs if I have no reason to go out, I'm overly affectionate, I can be clingy, I have mostly guy friends, I'm pretty weird and awkward, sometimes I accidentally fart when I orgasm, and I smoke too much weed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 07:53 PM
1

Man one: 5 Gives off a gross Mr. Rogers vibe. He looks like an old man and a boy simultaneously. Man two: 8 Yes please. He looks tall and has nice hair. Man three: 4 Your basic unattractive feminine looking dork. Man four: 7 He's objectively attractive, but not necessarily my type. Man five: 1 How are his arms so skinny while his mid section is huge?! Such bizarre proportions. Man six: 7 Once again, objectively above average. But, he's not my type and looks a bit gay. Man eight: 3 Maybe if he lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/17 07:38 PM
2

being a faggot trapped in a womans body that was never an issue fo rme Lmao, I think this is exactly my problem
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 02:36 AM
3

Woman 1: 7 Woman 2: 10 Woman 3: 6 (with mouth closed) Woman 4: 8 Woman 5: 8 Woman 6: 4 Woman 7: 7.5 Woman 8: 4
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/17 02:31 AM
3

Then I doubt the girl was actually 100% dtf. She was likely still weighing the options.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 02:50 AM
3

It doesn't make them feel safer, it generally kills the mood meaning no sex at all Not if you're attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/17 02:17 AM
1

I don't consciously limit myself, it's just a matter of attraction. There have been a couple guys my height who I've found somewhat attractive, but I know for a fact they'd be hotter to me if they were taller. I wouldn't sweat it. I know it's sucks to hate parts of yourself that you can't change, I have a large rib cage and wide shoulders. But, we're all a combination of attractive and unattractive traits, the trick is emphasizing the good while downplaying the bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/17 05:13 PM
2

That I'm good enough for sex, but nothing else. I also have an illogical fear that all men are liars and users. When dating or in a relationship, I feel insecure over appearing too needy or desperate. To overcome these illogical thoughts, I remind myself that there's a world outside of my own romantic struggles. I remind myself that men are human and complex, just like women. I take comfort in my friends and family, with the knowledge that they value who I am as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:15 PM
6

Gay men actually put effort into their appearances, so a lot of them are hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 05:09 PM
1

I'm aware, but the instinctual draw to tall males doesn't just go away overnight. Also, thank you for calling me smart :)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:46 PM
1

What do you think "Shallow" means? Personally, I think it's an empty word used to shame people for their natural attraction ques. However, height is only "good" because the american society has decided it's good More like our ancestors millions of years ago decided it was good. It provides the natural advantage of size. In the wild bigger is better. Probably because a sedentary skinny girl isn't actually eating like a fat girl. If she did, she wouldn't be skinny anymore False. She could have a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 04:34 AM
1

Smarter. Intelligence is more attractive than money.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 03:13 AM
1

I can almost guarantee that otterbod is the preference over dad bod for 95% of women, regardless of what the special snowflakes want to say Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 01:08 AM
1

Note the distinct lack of sensitivity to the emotions of others, the taunting and otherwise unwillingness to empathize You're confusing empathy and sensitivity with sympathy. Women are better at identifying emotions, but this doesn't mean they're necessarily more caring. withholding sex doesn't guarantee a future with him No, but it does a better job than having sex on the first date. If you really found him sexually desirable you would kick yourself if he started going out with another woman wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/17 01:07 AM
1

Yes, but how many women are being forced to choose between 'dad bod' and 'roided out meathead.' You'd be surprised. Otterbod dudes are rare and in high demand. There are mostly dadbods and fatstrong guys. America is getting real big. Why is she blowing me off for Mr. Otterbod dude? But I explicitly said otterbod was the ideal!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:30 PM
1

Also it's still a red flag (i.e. poor decision making/failure to learn after the first 1 or 2 times) It's not poor decision making, it's called being human. Insecure or not they have a right to feel that way Sure, no one has said they don't. But, they should probably understand that most insecurities are illogical. and in many cases its justified by the actions of women All I hear is "waaah it's all women's fault!" They are simply not mature enough to handle the emotions of men Lmao, because men…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:24 PM
1

Or simply don't date women who seem to value you less than their previous partners Or simply increase your value. Either way, good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:17 PM
1

One reflects lifestyle and choices, the other is completely unrelated to your personality So because weight is "related to personality", judging someone by it is less shallow? Why is wanting good genes in a partner a bad thing? Also, we all know most men wouldn't reject a sedentary skinny girl who eats like a fat girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 10:13 PM
1

My point is that I definitely prefer your average dad bod to a hulk-looking motherfucker. Otter-mode is my favorite, with dad bod coming in second, and the body-builder look coming in dead last. which is different than saying that women can be turned on by men with dad bods, a statement that I would agree with That's fair. I still get wet from shirtless pictures that the guys I'm dating send me, even though they have dad bods. They still have masculine ratios and nice hairy chests, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:17 PM
19

Feminism is about freedom of choice for women to live within genders roles, outside of them, or somewhere in between.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:13 PM
1

If he really liked you he would have committed to you just as quickly as he had for any other woman Except he might have learned from his past mistakes, and now that he's older and wiser he's more careful with his commitment. If she was simply turning over a new leaf and wasn't letting ANY future guys hit it without jumping through hoops that's one thing Well, I think this is what happens in the majority of cases. It's an insult on the deepest of levels for you to be like "Yeah I slept with tons…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:10 PM
1

Mind you he is still giving it away for free when it comes to other women he meets after you That doesn't bother me. I don't really care what he does after we're done. He only raises the value of his commitment in relation to you, when dealing with other women that he met after you he still gives it out freely Then it sounds like my value is lacking relative to the other women. I can either accept that or whine how life isn't fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:05 PM
1

Despite. These guys had attractive qualities going for them that made me look past whatever other flaws they had. Pock marks, love handles, stretch marks, scars, pimples etc don't matter when he's tall and handsome.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 06:03 PM
1

I've gotten wet for some dad bods. But, not ones with beer bellies. A good dad bod is still relatively lean, just not toned. It's the same thing as skinny-fat. Would I be more attracted to a nice set of abs? Absolutely :p Would I be more attracted to a square-shaped meat-head body builder? Hell no.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:56 PM
2

How is that more valid than a height requirement? It's the same damn thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:41 PM
3

That's because they are. Except for the second dude, he's just average.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:33 PM
3

Low genetic quality with nothing to compensate for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:29 PM
1

Well, it's different if he is still doing that in the present and/or future. But, I don't think that accurately represents the reality of the situation. Plus, a man can only really commit to one woman at a time. Still, it wouldn't really upset me that he's "charging" more for his commitment than he used to. What would upset me is being strung along while he's seriously dating another woman at the same time, but how often does that happen? So, I think it's reasonable for a guy to be upset if he's…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/17 04:25 PM
2

I sort of disagree. I think gay men like the extremes (girly looking twinks or huge hulking testosterone monsters) while women tend to like men in the sweet spot between the two extremes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:59 PM
1

that any admission of any weakness whatsoever demolishes any chance you may have at a lasting relationship and (c) sexual strategy is amoral Ok. So, if I believe any admission of sluttiness demolishes any chance at a lasting relationship, and that sexual strategy is amoral, why wouldn't I lie about n count? It's intellectually inconsistent to judge women for utilizing the same strategies they endorse. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if you are serious. Nothing personal, but given the details yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 06:48 PM
1

I learned what I already knew to be true: everyone is out for themselves, and they will literally rationalize anything to further their own interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 05:50 PM
2

But you seem to be pretty hung-up about the idea that men (especially the sort of men you want to date) might hold your history against you Wow, I'm human. You caught me. Humans tend to get caught up by things they feel personally disadvantaged by. But to be honest, I'm more interested in why red pillers claim that withholding the truth about their beta pasts is a-ok, but women withholding the truth about their slutty pasts is a horrible sin. I mean I already know the answer, one benefits them a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 05:44 PM
3

Just because there's LESS men attracted to them doesn't mean a big chunk still aren't I don't think you understand what the word "most" means. Maybe women should read between the lines and not get raped Aaaaand that tells me everything I need to know about your character. Now I'll just proceed to click "block user" and ignore your existence, but I'm sure you're well used to women doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 05:34 PM
1

You can stop being a supplicating beta and grow a spine, or recover from being an romantically unsuccessful incel; but you can't undo your sexual history So? You can stop being a slut, but you can't undo your beta history. How many women are going to outright reject a man who has been a pushover earlier in his life? Men don't usually share the unflattering parts of their past with the women they're with. If a woman found out their man was naturally a weak coward with no spine, a guy who had to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 05:29 PM
5

Gay men want commitment from unattractive men Rofl, what gay men have you been talking to? Gay men barely want commitment at all, that's why they mostly have open relationships. Also, what men and women find attractive in men is very different. Gay men often find effeminate men appealing, while women do not. "getting commitment from men is hard" to change it "getting commitment from top 1% attractive men is hard" It's called reading between the lines and understanding context. Like when men say …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 05:18 PM
6

The goal post has always been there. No one wants commitment from unattractive men, so no, they don't count. It's like how men don't want sex with old women, so when they talk about "women" as a whole, they're usually referring to young (aka attractive) women. lol Justin Bieber is NOT the epitome of hotness. And he's not what most women are trying to land. We just want a normal non overweight non short guy with handsome facial features.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 05:04 PM
1

I'd say that's also unfair. And totally unrelated. The supplicating beta is the perfect male counterpart to the desperate slut. But somehow red pillers believe men are capable of learning from their mistakes, while women must wear theirs like a scarlet letter and suffer forever. Basically it boils down to team man bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 04:58 PM
4

Nah. Most all women here agree that getting casual sex as women is easy, but getting relationships is not. You can't prove that getting commitment from attractive men is easy, because it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 04:57 PM
2

It would make me feel like he values himself and his commitment more than he used to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 02:34 PM
3

So if she's made the mistake more than once, she should be doomed to a life of pump and dumps? Would you say the same thing to a former beta pushover trying to change strategies?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 02:27 PM
9

No one denies that it's easy for women to get sexual attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 02:18 PM
1

Height and dick, please. 23, white, northeast US. Plus, a good head of hair can distract from a subpar face.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 02:09 PM
1

How to let something 'naturally occur,' is a function of one's opinion No, it's not. By definition it's just the lack of intervention. So, using the biological definition of fitness, it would seem patriarchy has improved the fitness of the human species, not decreased it On the surface level, sure. It has increased our population at the price of overall genetic quality. Kind of like how inbreeding can cause a population to grow quickly, but the population will be genetically unfit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/17 03:38 AM
2

So is it common for a wife to have a masters while the husband just has a bachelors degree?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 08:05 PM
1

Trying to convince a sociopath to have morals is like trying to convince a fish to breathe air. People with natural altruistic morality don't require an explicit benefit to themselves. The feeling of doing good is enough of a reward. I suppose you'd avoid social exile from the legitimately moral people, if you pretend to think as they do. Is that enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 07:50 PM
3

If the problem is a shortage of educated men, then let's pull a Bernie Sanders and make college free for everyone :)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/17 07:29 PM
2

As a girl with a banging ass, pretty face, and weird boobs, this thread gives me hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 11:49 PM
1

It's from the bladder and contains urea, but it's not pure urine. The "squirting" in porn is definitely pee, though. Real life squirting doesn't look like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 09:50 PM
1

Exactly. I want a man who is capable of being violent, but only in defense of himself or someone he cares about. A violent person would seek out fights.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/17 09:48 PM
2

I'd rather he just stick to his own job and succeed at that, then. Or only help if he knows how to do it correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 09:01 PM
1

no usually its not the same mistake. So it's different mistakes over and over? That would be frustrating too, in a different way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:54 PM
3

you can ask and correct and mention it, but do not bitch about it I agree completely. But usually it starts off as a polite correction, the first time the guy fucks up, and then morphs into major bitching after the third or fifth time he makes the same mistake. Anyone who jumps down someone's throat for their first mistake is a huge asshole. Like if the wife decided to change the oil in her husband's car for the first time, and used the wrong oil, he'd be a jerk to berate her for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:50 PM
3

your wife will give you some pointers on how the dinner you cooked her could have been better, think she's helping. Then wonder why it's been three months and you haven't cooked for her again since Some people just don't take criticism very well, and would rather give up than risk facing criticism again. I find this to be a very feminine attitude. Men should embrace challenges and competition, not run from them. Everything else you said is very true. If she doesn't want to lose you, she won't ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:45 PM
6

How could he not know what kind of hamburger meat she had been buying for years? How could he be so stupid and inattentive as to buy the wrong meat? Exactly. It makes her see him as incompetent at best, which is very unattractive, or at worst, uninterested in her needs. Especially if she always makes sure her husband has the food he likes. If your boyfriend cares enough to cook you dinner, even if it sucks, you should thank him instead of telling him where he needs improvement If he makes a meal…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:31 PM
2

tough shit, dont use words you dont understand then. I can tell from your posts that you dont have a degree in biology or anthropology. Whether i have a degree is entirely irrelevant because it doesnt say 'koffing' on my diploma and im not telling you my real name so i cant prove anything can i? I understand every word I use, perhaps you just have difficulty with reading comprehension? It's hypocritical to insult my intelligence and grasp of biology, when you yourself possess no superior credent…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:22 PM
4

Aw! That's so sweet :) I'm sure she appreciates it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:11 PM
3

You come out and say, "Oh...you folded the towels. But you did them the long way first instead of the short way first. Didn't you see how the rest of the towels in the closet were folded?" Ok, I can definitely see where you're coming from. I guess it depends on how minor the situation is. Some people might take towels very seriously, but I for one do not, lol. I do take food seriously, though. I'm a picky eater, and if my boyfriend repeatedly screws up and keeps buying/making me the wrong thing,…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:09 PM
2

I wouldn't mind if you were using them correctly ;) You clearly have just leaned by rote what context you can use what sciency word in Oh, I'm sorry. Do you have a degree in biology or anthropology? If not, then I don't appreciate being talked down to :) if natural selection does anything we're going to end up very tall with grossly enlarged genitals Lol! What a great visual. Fortunately, there's a point where too much height would make living (and therefor reproducing) very difficult. Same with…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 08:03 PM
3

So, if you give your girlfriend with a peanut allergy a pb and j sandwich, do you expect her to shovel it down and say thank you through her rapidly closing windpipe? And then do you get pissy if she suggests maybe leaving out the peanut butter next time? Rofl. This just sounds like a fear of criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:50 PM
2

again with the science words, did someone buy you the big book of biology for ages 10+ for christmas? No, but maybe I'll buy one for you, if you find my big words so intimidating :) combated by modern medicine, not evolution The strength of an individual's immune system is mostly genetic. Unless youre talking about genetic disease, in which-case i'd like to see your sources on society wide rates of hereditary disease because that sounds interesting. Unfortunately, a lot of genetic diseases run u…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:39 PM
4

I suppose at that age she'd rather mother some grandbabies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:28 PM
2

we do not understand the human genome well enough to say if we are tending towards 'genetic fitness' I honestly doubt we have been, since the invention of patriarchal societies that allowed unfit males to reproduce. But, the traits we naturally select for have been proven (over millions of years of evolution) to be conducive to the survival of the species. So, when you let sexual selection naturally occur, the species will improve at a natural progression through each consecutive generation. cap…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:21 PM
1

The way biology defines it: making a species more genetically fit and capable of surviving.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:11 PM
6

Yeah, not what i said. You claimed laws against rape and violence only benefit women, and they do not. They also benefit children, old men, and weak men. Men cant work with children without being accused of being a pedo - biology Nah, that's entirely social. And the rest of what you've listed is just ranting/whining about things not being the way you want them to be. men need to change their baser aspects that arent compatable modern society but women are apparently unable to do so Women's tende…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 07:09 PM
4

Humans arent biologically meant to form monogamous relationships that last for 40-60 years Agreed. We're meant to form pair bonds that last around 5-7 years, coincidentally the age when children stop needing constant care. men are expected to rise above their human nature and not rape/be violent/do anything women dont like I don't think men like being raped or killed any more than women do. Laws against rape and violence benefit older/weaker men as much as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 06:59 PM
7

An inordinate amount of responsibility. According to modern day man-children who want to be mothered. I rest my case. It's illogical and kind of stupid in today's society That's irrelevant to biology. It's like saying don't bother owning an umbrella, because it's sunny today. Our cozy modern environment could disappear tomorrow, and we'd be back to "getting attacked by big human beings looking to steal your resources".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 06:56 PM
11

Men have been doing that for decades as the breadwinners Those men also took care of the finances, household/vehicular maintenance, and their children's discipline. "Meant" or socially forced to? I think that's not gonna be much of a thing anymore. Biologically meant to. If women were physically capable of defending themselves and their children on their own, they would. Since they typically cannot, they seek a mate with the ability to physically protect them. It's kind of common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 06:49 PM
4

it does when a guy's kids would also need inappropriate mothering as adults Mothers hardly ever get sick of mothering their own biological children. They always see their babies as babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 06:40 PM
6

"if you can't handle me at my worst etc" Ideally, we should all be able to handle our loved ones through the ups and downs. But yeah, anyone who demands it like in that quote is a shit person, man or woman. However, divvying up responsibilities equally between partners only makes sense. It's when one person takes on too many responsibilities that the relationship becomes unequal and the individual with too much on their plate begins to resent their partner. I also think men will generally tolera…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 06:25 PM
3

Do Hate and/or disrespect women, abuse animals, run from a fight, complain, speak or write in a way that makes me question their intelligence Wear "Thug" type clothing. I.e. long t shirts and baggy pants that don't cover their ass. Also, any type of clothing that is too loose and doesn't fit. See: mom jeans. Look Effeminate, small, bald, overweight, childlike, recessed chin, tiny hands, high pitched voice Act Weak, cowardly, hateful, bitter, insecure, stupid, incompetant
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 06:17 PM
32

How does not wanting to be a mother to a full grown adult correlate to not wanting to be a mother to ones own children?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 06:10 PM
1

El Chapo is a cruel murderer, on top of being short and tubby, No gracias. Andrew Jackson was like the Donald Trump of his time. He also gets a hard pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:47 PM
1

Haha exactly!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:38 PM
2

True. But, that doesn't stop male animals from immediately attempting to impregnate the female with his offspring. If previous sexual activity were naturally repulsive, the male would have killed the female as well as her offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:36 PM
1

Any love for military men? They're usually politically conservative, and they have to shave their heads, ew :( I like hippie liberals with long hair. What do you think of Pat Tillman, pro football player and Green Beret? He's objectively attractive. Not my type, though. His face is too square for my tastes, I prefer angular faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:27 PM
1

Huh. Why is virginity a deal breaker for you? Because it's unattractive. I want a man with sexual and romantic experience. Would your thoughts be different if he was an extraordinarily high-value man, like a former Green Beret combat medic who became a Harvard-educated dermatologist and likes to devote his spare time to environmentalist political campaigning? No. We would still be incompatible. I'd definitely be friends with a guy like that, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:21 PM
1

Chevalier de Saint-George sounds like he was a cool dude. And I'm definitely not into athletes or sports fanatics.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:20 PM
1

but if a man says something like that women just take that as a sign of confidence, self-awareness, and security, and built up their fantasy of him even more Nah. If a man came out and said that he's an immature man child, women would head for the hills. Confidence alone is not the end all be all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:18 PM
1

I do not have an electra complex, so it's not hypocritical to avoid men with Oedipus complexes. I don't want my man to be my daddy, that's gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:16 PM
1

Dude, you should just copy and paste your comments from now on. It would take a lot less effort than rephrasing the same bullshit over and over.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:15 PM
1

Is a virgin really worse than an "all my exes are crazy" type to you, and why? Yes. Virginity is unattractive to me, and therefor a deal breaker. "All my exes are crazy" would be a red flag, but not necessarily a deal breaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 11:14 PM
2

Why? If they're not worried about their son fucking people, they shouldn't be worried about their daughter fucking people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 05:12 AM
6

Hey, you miss every shot you don't take! Also, not every father has a weird puritanical fascination with his daughter's sex life.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 04:48 AM
2

other avenues to create love are needed for men, so we won't just fuck and run forever(or most of us won't) Explain? What is the most effective "avenue" to encourage the development of male romantic attachment?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 04:45 AM
3

Its the man no longer leading and regressing into a boy like state, becoming too beta Yeah, and treating his wife like his mother. If a woman is sexually satisfied she doesn't care about cooking and cleaning and comforting on occasion and what not(not saying she loves chores either, but she won't feel disdain) Sure, and the only way she can be sexually satisfied is when she feels her partner is a man, not a child. I also find it hard to believe most divorces are caused by the man getting lazy an…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 04:38 AM
1

Because if we didn't want so badly to pair bond, our rather fragile offspring wouldn't have a great chance of surviving.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 04:34 AM
3

Those things are not innately parental in nature. And, like in love, the way they're expressed in a romantic relationship is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 04:32 AM
4

The husband is both the father and the lover and so expresses both forms of love. And that's where it becomes gross. I have a great dad, I don't need another one. I want my partner to be a father to our potential kids, not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 12:59 AM
5

Well, you're looking at mostly the top 10% of men if that. It's very rare overall And it's worth searching for! Almost all divorces occur because the man stops acting like an adult and becomes more like another child for his wife. I don't want to end up a miserable shrew, just because I picked a man with an Oedipus complex. your shaming of it comes from ignorance Not everything is "shaming", I swear that word gets thrown around like confetti around here. The Oedipus and Electra Complexes are rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 12:54 AM
6

Inside all women is a little girl that wants to be loved, accepted, guided, protected, by her father, and she seeks it through the man she loves too. I don't buy this Freudian type of thinking. The kind of love, acceptance, guidance, and protection I desire from a sexual partner is VERY different from what I receive from my father. Parental love is cool, nurturing, steady and unconditional, albeit often patronizing. Romantic love is passionate, it's unpredictable, it's honest, but most important…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 12:49 AM
5

That's really gross, if I'm being honest. It makes sense to select a mate with good parenting potential, but the way you phrase it sounds creepy as fuck. though some men(rather rare) are able to mostly slay/resolve that boy and get rid of the desire for motherly warmth as a result too Oh thank god. Those are the only men I'm interested in. I don't want a guy with an Oedipus complex and mommy issues, thanks. I have no desire to be a replacement mommy to a person that one, I didn't give birth to, …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 12:29 AM
2

attachment for motherly replacement Could you explain this?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 12:18 AM
4

I think it's possible for men to become desensitized, as well. How often does a man who fucks a new girl every night fall in love with a ONS?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 12:04 AM
3

I really don't care. I just want to know that there were indeed exes in the past, because that means the person is capable of forming and maintaining sexual relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 09:46 PM
2

Or maybe we hate hearing it, because it makes up 99% of all your comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 09:37 PM
3

Women select for fit genes, not good character.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/17 09:36 PM
3

Yep, he just needs to acknowledge those feelings. I think natural male possessiveness is a good thing, it's partly why relationships exist in the first place. Not everyone can do casual sex, and that's ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 05:22 PM
1

But you literally did in the above comments. "Why don't girls want men for who they are? Waaah"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 05:11 PM
3

This isn't a gendered phenomenon, It's common for unattractive people to "preference shame" attractive people who hold preferences for physical traits that the shamer does not possess. It's insecurity and selfishness. As if you could shame someone into finding you attractive. Sorry bbws, most men aren't going to find you attractive. Sorry manlets and q balls, same goes for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 05:06 PM
5

Why do you put oppression in scare quotes? Women weren't just "modest and wholesome", they were miserable and repressed. How would you feel if you were forced to have sex with a disgusting man who beats you and your children and keeps you financially trapped, while society does nothing? Forcing anyone to give up their personal freedoms is objectively immoral, but it's easy for someone from a position of priveldge to ignore that. Doing away with slavery also destabilized American society, but tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/17 04:52 PM
3

The definition of theism is believing in a higher supernatural power. Even the eastern religions you mentioned maintain a belief in a creator of some sort. You're really grasping if you're calling a secular philosophy or culture a religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 10:09 PM
3

A religion requires a deity or deities. What you are describing is culture, not religion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 08:44 PM
4

you really can't deny that there is no concerted SJW push to make taking pics of people in public taboo Rofl, do you really think it's an SJW conspiracy? Taking pictures of people without their consent has been frowned upon since the invention of the camera. People like their privacy, and they don't want unflattering pictures of themselves floating around on random people's cameras/phones. How is this hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 08:40 PM
2

You can swap the word genetics for good looks, if that better suits your sensibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 08:21 PM
10

The concept of her meeting others didn't bother me beforehand, it's when she actually brings it up and then mentions he lives close to her which turned me off You were ok with the concept, when it was still just a concept. Now, it's real and in your face, and that's what makes you uncomfortable. You're attempting to shift the blame to the girl, so you don't have to confront how you really feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 08:12 PM
2

It depends on how unattractive and beta Benny actually is. From the comments it sounds like he's a loser weeb, and that's a total turn off. But, if he were intellectual and had nice genetics underneath the dad bod, I'd pick Benny 100% of the time. I'd choose the alpha if I also get to have sex with other people. Or, if I were the only legit wife and he was sneaky about cheating on me. That way, I'd get to feel fully committed to, and he has to deal with the guilt of being a scumbag behind my bac…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 08:08 PM
22

You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't have a casual relationship and also feel special or like she's committed to you. It doesn't sound like you're ready for the reality of casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/17 07:58 PM
4

I have a pretty specific type but, there are many guys that fit the bill, and they can come from totally different backgrounds. Asian, native, white, Arabic, and mixed race men have all been attractive to me (assuming they're tall, masculine, and have long dark hair). I usually go for the nerdy musician type, personality-wise. I used to be really into the emo look when I was a teenager, and I'm still a fan of the hair haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/17 06:33 PM
2

Or perhaps the push back against these new refined definitions exists because omegas want to keep living in the delusion that they are actually betas?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/17 06:14 PM
1

If the world followed this idea of hypergamy (and it well should considering the evolutionary benefit to having better resources for children, and having raised smarter, more attractive children leads to a better species) then Hitler's ideas never would have lost Ah, the classic cry of "eugenics!!" and the immediate jump to Nazis. Here's the thing, Hitler's ideas lost because they were extreme, bigoted, and resulted in genocide. Darwin's ideas, meanwhile, are still going strong. And that's becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 06:27 PM
2

No. They have low genetic value, but they could absolutely have high value as people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 06:14 PM
2

Genetic garbage as defined by anyone that doesnt find hood trash attractive...some gangbanger slinging crack at the trap house and robbing people Hm..I'm sensing a racial bias, which causes me to largely disregard your argument. You seem overly fixated on "the hood" stereotype of an alpha male, and I can't help but wonder why. There are plenty of other types of attractive men that are getting laid without being a "hindrance to the progress of society". That doesnt explain womens continued stupid…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 06:09 PM
2

Doing away with our ancient instincts would be like forgetting how to count numbers, because we have calculators now. We're just one world war or major natural disaster away from losing our comfy modern environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 03:03 AM
2

it serves no place in our current society Male competition will always serve a purpose for our species, and economic competition has proven to be good for our societies. The gangbanger from the hood with 4 kids from 4 different baby mamas is genetic garbage Genetic garbage by whose definition? Only mother nature and the environment dictate which genes are shitty and which genes deserve to be passed on. Incel losers are the ones with unfit genetics, not the individuals which prove themselves capa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 02:45 AM
2

Dark triad men mate more Source? And even if that were true, why would that be a problem? Those traits are useful for individual survival. these urges are counterproductive in the modern environment Not entirely. There are still people starving to death or fighting for their lives, even in the first world. Some instincts will never be wholly useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/17 02:41 AM
5

You do realize that it serves the entire species as a whole, right? It's the human imperative, not the female imperative. Look beyond yourself and see the big picture. Without hypergamy, males would have no reason to compete, unfit genes would run rampant through the population, and the species would have stagnated millions of years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:25 PM
2

I would define it as the female instinct to select mates with superior genetics and social status (relative to themselves). It's an adaptation which ensures that each new generation of offspring will be more biologically fit than the preceding generation. Is it hated by men because it provokes insecurity or fear? Yes. They're unable to look beyond their own struggles to realize that hypergamy serves an important biological purpose. It's likely that humanity as we know it today wouldn't exist wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 05:18 PM
3

Because it's usually their genetic phenotype that is the problem, and no amount of advice can fix a weak chin/jawline, lack of height, or a feminine frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:24 PM
3

Stupidity, right wing views, cowardice, cruelty, lack of sex skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:17 PM
5

If I'm physically attracted to a guy, I can determine that instantly. But, that same guy could totally ruin any and all feelings by saying/doing the wrong thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 04:12 PM
4

I guess my attraction works like a man's then? Because I definitely know instantly whether I want to fuck a guy or not. -shrug-
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/17 03:51 AM
1

I wouldn't do anything that carries a high risk of negative consequences. So, no stealing or lying to police. But, I would tell as many white lies as necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/17 05:04 PM
2

No. Height is a necessary component for physical attraction to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/17 11:17 PM
3

It's easy to say that if you're good looking enough to be confident your approach will be welcome Yeah. This is likely the reason I've never been rejected. So, your best bet is to become attractive enough where you're confident you won't be turned down. This is basic advice for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 09:48 PM
7

This woman needs to stop being a little bitch and just approach the men she's interested in. Take it from me, it's really not that difficult, and it's usually worth the tiny amount of risk. Oftentimes the man will take over the pursuit after you approach, he just needs to be confident that you're interested.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/17 06:25 PM
3

The same way you settled: being with someone they're not attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 05:56 PM
4

The good news is, they were probably settling for you too.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 05:44 PM
5

I love bad boys, too much wholesomeness looks like weakness to me, and it's is a total turn off. Give me a leather jacket and a jerk-smirk, mm. Some of my favorite baddies: Damon Salvatore (vampire diaries), Khal Drogo (game of thrones), Spike (buffy), Rhett Butler (gone with the wind), Chuck Bass (gossip girl), Bender (breakfast club), Rollo (vikings), Anakin Skywalker (star wars), Russel Brand (in literally anything he's in)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 07:37 PM
1

I think it's important to separate the idea of what's "right" with what is useful for the survival of a species. Occasionally those two things will overlap, but not always.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 06:10 PM
0

Regulating the sexual market place would violate bodily autonomy. Regulating the economic market does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/17 06:06 PM
2

Men would feel the same way, if their freedom and sexuality were sold to the highest bidder.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 06:50 PM
1

Violent men are always going to kill people, whether they have a reason to or not. That's why we have law enforcement. Regardless, no consequence is too large to justify sexual slavery of half the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 06:46 PM
1

Legitimate academic evolutionary psychology is common sense that most people don't consider controversial. However, the misogynistic conclusions TRP reaches under the guise of evo-psych read like conspiracy theory nonsense to every normal person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:25 PM
1

Sort of. Months of texting and phone calls consisting of sweet nothings and empty promises, followed by a few nice dates with sex, then I get thoroughly ghosted. That's really douchy I agree (unless you traumatize them with sex or something). Lol, judging from their reactions they enjoyed the sex. And a majority came back for seconds and thirds. Then once I started feeling like we were really going somewhere serious, they'd disappear without a word.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:21 PM
1

so don't feel special and think I kept you in my head for a month I'm glad, but that would make me feel nauseous, not special.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:15 PM
2

You're still thinking about a comment from a month-old thread? Yikes, you really need to learn how to let shit go.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:07 PM
2

Most explicitly said they wanted a relationship, or at the very least wouldn't be opposed to one. And how does one imply with behavior that one wants a relationship? By doing relationshippy things, going on serious dates, and performing romantic gestures. A few also made vague promises about the future. "let's go to this concert in a few months, you could be my date to my sister's wedding next year, we should go on a road trip someday" etc, etc. I really don't understand why they do this, especi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 06:04 PM
2

Objects don't have sex, you're not objectified when someone has sex with you, you're more human than ever. Except humanity has been sticking its penises in objects forever. See: flesh lights, holes in trees, holes in the ground, car exhaust pipes. Maybe you had too many red flags and the sex wasn't good enough so that the overall looked like not worth a relationship? Perhaps. But, you'd think men would have the balls (or at least the common decency) to voice those feelings, instead of dropping o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 05:59 PM
1

Not seeing your point. Economic abuse is preventing the other party from having or using their money, not expecting men to pay for dates. I suppose OP is "being the one to define men's and women's roles", but I don't find that particularly abusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 05:57 PM
1

She's annoying, dramatic, snobby, thinks she's better than everyone else, entitled, she pushes me away then gets pissed off when I do stay away from her. Aw, and you'd still "reach for the center of the earth" for her? Also, I shouldn't even say this because it breaks the red pill code! But she's older than me. Almost in her 40s but god damn is she gorgeous and fit. Ooh you're a redpill outlaw now. The brothers will never accept you back into their fold, lol. Wait women knew how to read and writ…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:56 AM
1

they're not the ones complaining on an internet forum about it. Who knows, the internet is a big place filled with complaining people. Even now, you're complaining about someone complaining. It all comes full circle, doesn't it? Have I gotten under your skin so much that you keep infesting my comments? Do move along and avert your gaze if I bother you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:52 AM
1

Red pill women aren't women as we know women to be. They're evolved. They have divine grace. They are Angels. I see we've taken a detour away from reality. Let me buckle my seat-belt. Someone I keep trying to forget but honestly I can't, not even when I'm drunk out of my mind I'm sorry, that shit sucks. You get alpha widowed? Tell me the story, I'm drunk too. YEAH? Where? Rofl, literally any female poet or song writer who wrote about romance! Just because a women are a certain way because of nat…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:49 AM
1

You implied that you think your sex for his sex PLUS SOMETHING ELSE is an equal trade Both parties would be receiving sex and commitment. You honestly don't think guys will think they're being screwed over in that trade? Everyone feels screwed over in life. I mean I get that YOU think it's equal, because you're so savvy in evolutionary psychology or whatever, but other people don't. Their ignorance of biology is their problem. It's not my job to sit them down in front of a nature documentary or …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:41 AM
3

Women cannot feel love. A very few women can Nice contradiction, do go on... but the vast majority of women do not know what love is. They are ''in love'' until the bigger, better deal comes along. Only men can love. Aww, who hurt you? Men compose the most beautiful poems for women. Men die for women Women have done both of those things throughout history. Damn, women are defective How is it defective, biologically? It makes perfect sense for the sex which carries the young to desire protection …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:37 AM
1

It's unethical to attempt to screw every guy over in every relationship, and demand more from him than giving him in return It sure would be, if that were what I was saying. But, I understand reading comprehension isn't everyone's strong suit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:31 AM
3

And what makes you believe that the relationship that you get is going to last? you are probably going to be the one to end it as its women who end most relationships anyway. That's why. The potential for lifelong, all consuming love is worth the risk, especially if if I'm the one who's likely to end things anyway. You can get laid whenever you want. Easily. Without even having to be funny or charming. Why do you feel lonely? I guess men will never understand this. Sex and companionship/validati…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:29 AM
1

But why do you want a serious relationship when you are young? Because I won't be young forever? Because I'm lonely and I miss being in a romantic relationship? Did they have money at least? I'm not a gold digger, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:24 AM
1

So why isn't it okay for a man to cheat on and lie to someone who believes that? Because cheating is unethical, regardless of who you're cheating on. It's misandrist to someone with a huge advantage to be entitled to even more of an advantage in this situation I don't think you know what the word misandrist means. Maybe you should try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/17 04:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter