TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

WomenAreAlwaysRigh Archive

View 20 posts and 482 comments by WomenAreAlwaysRigh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
82

NewsWomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights23/06/14 02:35 AM
60

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:01 AM
23

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:32 AM
15

DiscussionWomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:58 AM
13

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:41 AM
10

Misleading TitleWomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:51 PM
5

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:40 PM
4

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:21 AM
4

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:14 PM
4

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:49 PM
3

Men's Rights NewsWomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:07 AM
3

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:13 PM
2

CrosspostWomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:18 AM
2

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:34 AM
0

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:06 PM
0

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights24/05/14 09:57 PM
0

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:52 PM
0

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:33 PM
0

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights21/07/14 08:43 AM
0

WomenAreAlwaysRigh/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:03 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah. We got a few pioneers in talking about portrayal of boys in the media and then we got a bunch of know it alls "MRAs" bashing them because "thins doesn't solve anything". Progress.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 08:11 AM
1

the comments in that artcicle are pretty awful. here too.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 08:09 AM
2

you go first
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:37 AM
1

what a slut
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:24 AM
4

Being asked for a date is a situation you need to run away from? That cunt should learn basic social skills instead of pretending her own social ineptitude is worth a political cause.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:05 PM
9

Cornered? Bahahahahaha... Keep making shit up turd.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:16 PM
-5

Because i don't call every woman who doesn't want to have sex with me a whore? So evolved.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 06:36 PM
10

a thing to back up reddit posts.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:58 AM
3

That thread will not appear in Jezebel.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:07 AM
8

always back up your reddit posts with redditlog.com
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:05 AM
1

What about the potential, desire, or existence of a relationship as a condition for this desire to be "raped". It seems to me that these fantasies that involve an alpha male "ravishing" or "raping" a woman, all happen in the context of a relationship, where at least the potential of marriage or a serious relationship exists. What do you think about this?
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 09:20 PM
1

To be honest, amidst the holocaust currently taking place in Gaza, this gender diferentiation is petty and irrelevant.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:20 PM
1

because women are beautiful creatures that deserve to be cherished.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:12 AM
-11

blame the jews
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:42 AM
3

Yeah. Saying men as a collective work more would be "offensive".
/r/MensRights21/07/14 07:02 AM
18

wow, is that a real advert? wow, just wow. Extremely offensive.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 06:53 AM
1

so why is this "worse" in this sub in your opinion as a mod?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 01:32 AM
-1

i decided to avoid any sort of confrontation thats where you sucked
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:57 AM
-12

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA, fucking puritan amercans
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:28 AM
-14

it looks like appropriate response to me. addendum: the suit, turds.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:21 AM
0

yeah, just LOL at that white knight.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:20 AM
2

They probably had to fill quotas.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:02 AM
1

how is one related to the other? men don't vote in the congress with the "gender" in mind. ONly women do that stupid shit.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 06:07 PM
3

I really doubt she knew who Brett Sokolow is at the moment of writing that article.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 08:22 PM
-14

take your attention whoring elsewhere then, turd.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 03:48 AM
1

wow that page is still up? seems like a huge joke.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 03:44 AM
-14

what is the url of this page of yours?
/r/MensRights15/07/14 03:38 AM
1

Well... should I have said fundamentalist? it's not that far though, lol.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:32 AM
1

Well, conservative parents suck. And that example sounds like the exception and not the rule. Ouside of her family, the range of options for a girl to play sports is fairly wide.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:30 PM
3

she wasn't allowed by whom? her parents? school? peers?
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:10 PM
2

give me one example.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 06:50 PM
1

survivor or "survivor"? http://imgur.com/QvOBJFy
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:54 PM
1

It's funny, because, you know, as today you can barely find any instance of sexism against women in the real world, they have to resort to crime, as if crime was an example of sexism against women.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:49 PM
1

Bahaha... i bet that if you ask them why is this, they will come up with a bunch of vague, unfalsifiable statements. Not a single real example of sexism against women in the real world.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:33 PM
-10

poisoning her? LOLOLOL. It's been already established that drug was less harmful than a sip of tequila to the woman. If he poisoned someoone, it was the child. You fucking dumb turd.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:00 AM
1

well, whatever, he is being charged with murder, not with assault.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:55 AM
-3

If the woman aborts "her" child it's all fine and dandy. If the man induce her to abort it's murder. Blatant hipocrisy. If they want to be consistent the should be more creative about what they want the man to screw for.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:50 AM
-1

just lol at your broad definition of "assault".
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:48 AM
-4

how is it not relevant? it was his child too.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:47 AM
-5

False flag?. Are you fucking retarded? The fact that you feel uncomfortable seeing the blatant double standard here tells a lot of your own immaturity, and nothing about "false flags".
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:46 AM
2

Intriguing stuff.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:39 PM
-2

Yeah, I can tell. That's why you resort to just downvoting like the retard you are.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:29 PM
-4

who gives a crap. that's none of our bussiness anyway.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:07 PM
7

That's brave.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:20 PM
-3

Not this crap again. Screenshots are dumb. They are easily manipulable. Just link to the source and don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:14 PM
3

Yeah. It's pretty ironic too. Guys like this "feminist" clown who are all against old fashioned gender roles and all that, suddenly become all macho as in "i don't need any defense in this case", "i'll do fine ignoring the advice of my lawyer", and "she did this stupid thing but I will teake it like a man". Talk about running a macho script.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 10:00 PM
3

The defense was good until Part of rape culture that hurts everyone is that it makes it difficult to talk about what is and is not consent, There he fried himself. I will never have a chance to defend myself. but I spoke with my lawyer, and she thinks I have a clear case to sue this woman for libel and get a restraining order, but I have no desire to bully or harm her He sounds like a sad self loathing masochistic retard.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 09:20 AM
0

So is he lying to appease MRAs? hhaha, gtfo.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 09:13 PM
1

That information was already contained in the wikipedia entry linked in the original post, so, aside from "hey guys, look at these controversial quotes from the guy", what is your point exactly?.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:57 PM
1

it has to do with it in the sense that if one of the parents ends up significantly worse after a divorce settlement, he child will usually identify with said parent and develop serious issues. Hellinger is one of the few that has identified this dynamic, and I recommend further reading of his work to understand it.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:06 PM
8

And what makes you think that we, as MRAs, "slut shame". Actually women dressing "slutty" is a non issue for us. However, most MRAs are aware that slut shaming is done mainly by women to other women as an expression of intrasexual competition and social control.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:59 PM
3

did you speak up?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 08:34 PM
0

Ernest Belfort Bax, marxist and founding father of Men's Rights. http://ernestbelfortbax.com/
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:26 AM
1

is this the guy that cried harassment when some dude hit on him? i wonder if he would make such a fuss if the "harasser" was a hot woman.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 01:05 PM
1

next time do a summary of the article.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 04:18 AM
1

get her fired.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 10:05 PM
8

Well, they are very lucky because, well, crime will always exist.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 09:58 PM
4

This just shows that feminists arent interested in lowering rape occurrences. They are interested in mantaining a neverending hysteria.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 09:54 PM
-1

one big fucking LOL at the burgueois, uptight middle class "left".
/r/MensRights08/07/14 08:31 PM
2

they said male reporters weren't allowed.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:02 PM
1

congrats
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:53 PM
8

AVFM will remain a private organization even if they trasparented their finances. They still could do whatever they want with the money while gaining support from people. I'm strongly in support of transparency because I have seen ugly shit in the past. Recently in Chile, directors of a prominent father's rigths organization called Amor de Papá were accussed by a group of lawyers from within said organization of misapropriation of funds after said directors were found planning family trips to th…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:26 PM
2

Well, it's clear then that you want avfm to remain being your little, fringe personal blog.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:06 PM
-2

even after a successful conference, Elam seems unable to make the leap from a small personal blog to something bigger.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:37 PM
30

Do you really not see how more transparency would attract more donors? You are definitely shooting yourself in the foot with this no-transparency-no-overseeing policy. As of right now, the fear of losing outweights the desire, bravery or hope for winning, imo.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:33 AM
0

SO now in the US, not only a woman could ruin a man's reputation at will. She can now destroy the reputation of an entire University.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 11:24 PM
3

you are dumb, gtfo.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:34 PM
0

you gotta understand that the "left" in the US is a huge joke. no shame in not getting their approval.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:53 AM
3

just lol at those old cunts.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:39 AM
2

LOOOOOOOOOL. First world "left" is such a joke...
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:21 AM
3

I could respect if feminists were honestly wrong about things such as poverty, sex traffic, etc.... but gaming?? really??
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:20 AM
9

just LOL at your factoids.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:15 AM
3

"We need to talk." I am not here to start shit. majority of human trafficking here are for sexual exploitation. gtfo
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:49 AM
1

communications director Paula Green forwarded copies of Citrus' free-speech policy, which declares that the campus is a "non-public forum" except where otherwise designated Sounds like those universities have adopted the libertarian motto: "this is private property so YOU can talk whatever I want".
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:22 AM
1

Me too. They were bitching about how misogynistic this sub is and I figured I had to see it myself, expecting people to be glorifying raping chicks or descriptive talk about women's body parts. This is interesting. There are blatantly misogynistic subs on reddit such as /r/rapingwomen and /r/beatingwomen, yet they are never commented or attacked by the feminists. Instead, they lash out against /r/mensrights and /r/theredpill. My guess is that somehow MR and TRP pose more of a treath to female pr…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 06:48 AM
2

mods please sticky this thread for a few days to bring attention to this resource.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:23 AM
5

Yeah, it's not like feminists/sjw types have lied about this shit in the past for attention.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:59 AM
2

next time use redditlog.com to save the thread from deletion.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 06:57 PM
6

What the fuck with the hygiene argument? I'm not circumcised and I keep my dick clean and the process is quite easy: showering regularly. And if you don't shower daily then you just wash your dick separately. what's the problem?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:00 PM
1

If your point is that more women should go to jail for having sex with teenagers then you would be dancing the tune of feminism. Suffragettes where the ones who successfully campaigned to raise the age of consent from 13 to 16. I'd prefer lowering the age of consent than treating teenagers like toddlers and sending more people to jail.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:42 AM
1

Well, given your situation seems weak now, take a final stab at the pot. Try to settle the situation in your terms talking to her IN PRESENCE of at least one of your superiors, so they are aware of the conversation taking place. Communicate that you're willing to move on, however respecting your own personal boundaries. It may or may not work, it could even accelerate your destitution, but it also gives you a strong chance to succeed. I believe its worth the risk and you may come out looking lik…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 04:27 AM
2

1000 people is a pretty decent sample.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 10:06 PM
-1

Sorry, no naked pics of /u/swordbytheprcious here.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 05:56 AM
0

Cause dudes defended themselves from an aggressive female and they were NOT arrested. Video evidence exonerated them though.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:13 AM
3

I'm very proud of myself and this thread since it's the first time I have seen againstmensrighters downvote each other. Se the "other discussion" tab.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 03:27 AM
2

dude get the fuck away. you come here demanding "proof" of shit that is available all around this sub including the side bar. Just lol at you coming here with empty hands contributing nothing to the discussion and demanding others to educate you. if you have anything to challenge these facts then the burden of the proof is on you. Get fucking real.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:48 PM
3

The same way elam is doing his shit, you're free to do your own. Elam has never claimed to represent anyone as far as i know and you don't need to ask anyone's permission to start your own pro men thing, if you're interested. The rest is rather noise if you ask me. You're take is very superficial as in saying "I don't want to associate with this man because he has said vtriolic things in the past". Sure, maybe if we had a bunch of organizations with a shit ton of money each to run things we coul…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 06:50 AM
3

he says stuff like how he would slam a woman's head against a wall repeatedly until she's a bloody pulp. That one is also satire. It is a reponse to a jezebel article called "why you should beat your boyfriend". This is explained at the very top of the article. It's clear you aren't reading things from their original source.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 06:37 AM
5

AVFM is getting all the attention it is getting because they are organizing a conference on men's issues. I haven't heard of other organzation that had did something on this scale before. Naturally it's to be expected that opponents will invest a lot of effort to find and publish shit on Elam and friends. The same way they have done with warren farrell in the past and the same way they will do with anyone who dares to talk about men's issues from a non feminist compliant perspective. So, AVFM is…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 06:24 AM
1

bahahaha, this usaid thing is just a facade that the us government uses to coerce other countries to obey to their dicates. What more praiseworthy than using the damsel in distress trope to disguise their real intentions? It's no coincidence this program is targeted at countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan. Good shit usaid has been kicked out of Bolivia, Ecuador, and soon from Venezuela.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 02:01 AM
1

The most you can do is ask a lawyer if shit gets ugly. And it's a pity that nobody break it down for you earlier, but truth is, in general, you're completely powerless in this situation, unless the bitch truly loves you, of course.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:46 AM
2

I'm not a fan of Cathy Young, but this is very lucid: Moreover, their protestations are belied by the fact that the preaching is backed by undisguised coercion. In feminist educator Bernice Sandler's list of "Ten Reasons to Obtain Verbal Consent to Sex," the assertion that "many partners find it sexy to be asked, as sex progresses, if it's okay" is followed by "Because you won't be accused of rape" and "Because you won't go to jail or be expelled." Fun, fun, fun. This is finally about coercion, …
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:24 AM
7

this comment from the youtube page reflects my thoughts exactly She's is a liar. Asking "can I kiss you" in general is very un-romantic, specially when it comes from the person who is suppossed to lead the interaction in a given time and moment. No amount of silly faces will change that
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:01 AM
6

gtfo on your high horse.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:18 PM
2

so you come to /r/mensrights to complain that we focus more on men? good one.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 11:09 PM
6

ps: yes, this sub is full of SRS and AMR socket accounts.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:17 PM
4

awesome. I was thinking of doing something along these lines. good job.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:16 PM
2

i almost puked.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:04 PM
11

translation: only women should be able to get away with murder.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:00 PM
-1

lol @ that pussy whiped newspaper.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:40 AM
73

lol at depicting guys casually talking about a rape that took place "last year".
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:45 AM
1

what's the twitter account we should contact
/r/MensRights18/06/14 06:26 PM
1

can we have links to those discussions?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:28 AM
1

jesus man, that was one of the biggest dispalys of poor writing and mental derrangement I have seen in a while. Good thin elam rescinded her "press credentials". I don't know what the hell they were thinknig whenthey entertained that stupid idea.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 03:46 AM
0

lol, welcome to my ignore list, buddy. btw, shrink it up, buddy. seriously.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:52 PM
-1

gtfo amr socket account.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:04 PM
1

She's already causing drama on twitter, accusing Paul Elam and Judgy Bitch of "asking for bribes". Remember, if she doesn't cause drama, she won't get get support, props and cheers from her online friends. That's how they function.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:09 AM
0

Yeah, because organizers don't have a lot of more important things to spend their money on than special security to watch some obvious troublemaker.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:39 PM
-5

fucking LOL. go away AMR socket account.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:37 PM
-3

This. I can't believe how people is being so fucking naive.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:31 PM
-3

Disregarding awhole history of threats, vandalism and plans to fuck shit up just because someone "promised" to behave is not smart.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:28 PM
0

lol... I like how you have to be very obvious and say "firguratively" just not to get accussed of "promoting violence".
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:25 PM
0

what do we, and the people paying for a serious event, gain by letting people who pose serious security threats in a convention such as this.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:57 PM
0

Not everyone enjoys the spectacle of someone making an ass of herself, specially if paying for a serious event, and the incident was foreseeable but it happened anyway because of poor planning. This is the person planning to attent as correpondant of AMR.. Letting her in is just overlooking a threat to attendants and speakers.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:47 PM
-1

LOL, why? There is a history of words an actions that indicate this is a very bad idea and asking for trouble. Why would you want to give her the benefit of the doubt? Just becuase she's pretty? That's just retarded.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:39 PM
-2

If they take extreme action (with the exception of harming anyone or violence of any sort) it will do nothing but make us look better, especially if we keep our cool. This is just wrong and insulting to any bonafide attendant. Not everyone who will attend is a saddistic guy who will enjoy the spectacle of some feminist making an ass of herself. Attendants to the convention deserve a safe environment with the least amount of disruption possible. Allowing these people to get in poses a serious sec…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:22 PM
2

She promised? Geez, man.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:16 PM
-4

classy.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:06 PM
-1

what exactly do we gain with that?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:58 PM
-2

And why are you so interested in having AMR idiots within the crowd inside the event?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:54 PM
-4

This, exactly.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:41 PM
-1

They raised money colectivelly. Nobody probably put more than $20. Plus, it is a female correpondant. Do you think she won't show up with a bunch of violence enabler white knights? If she get's kicked out, and security has to go physical, do you expect her not to make it a "MRAS assaulting female correspondant", "MRA's sexually assulted me and harrassed me for speaking up" thing? Jesus christ let's not fool ourselves. And lastly, Just because they payed a fee it is guarantee that they will show …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:36 PM
2

would you expect unethical people who have tried to shut this down at all cost to be polite? you are fooling yourself.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:32 PM
-3

The second if by far the better course of action.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:29 PM
2

and where is the indisputed evidence?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:07 PM
2

translated: "i'm retarded".
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:02 PM
1

I mostly agree with this. The puritan stance of AVFM is just dumb and wrong. Rooting for criminalization of sexual relationships between teenagers and women of over 18 to be as draconian as when sex are reversed is just a very mislead understanding of equality.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:51 PM
-1

fucking LOL.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 06:38 PM
-2

by an indian
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:42 AM
-5

lol indians are fucking awful.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 04:17 AM
2

why unconfirmed? it's pretty confirmed http://www.nickmom.com/more-lols/who-does-your-kid-love-more-you-or-dad/
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:01 AM
9

I concur. I would like to add that if there are links to some source of information you want to share, POST THOSE LINKS, do not post screenshots just because you "don't want to give them no clicks".
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:32 AM
1

LOL what, so no statute of limitations for a crime like this? Is this at the same level than genocide? just fucking LOL at these mangina judges.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 01:09 AM
1

I upvoted but... are you drunk?
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:59 AM
1

why?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:25 PM
-3

don't talk shit if you don't understand how wikipedia works.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:47 AM
-1

I don't think this matters that much though. Wikipedia is all about neutrality. If you do a good job ensuring neutrality and knowing and respecting the rules and principles of the site, you can go a long way.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:46 PM
1

Yeah. <When men are the victims, it's class and race. When women are the victims, it's all about gender.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:44 PM
3

we need more wikipedia editors.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:25 PM
7

I wonder if Anita Sarkeesian has critiqued this ongoing damsel in distress trope.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:22 PM
1

Being ashamed of your wife getting raped is incredibly shitty, regardless of culture. I totally see where she's coming from with this. Culture, son. There several and there are differences among them.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:50 AM
2

Amazing.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:41 AM
3

is this effective? I don't see anything about this on AVFM.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:19 AM
1

The other alternative would be to act like a pushover and lose your self respect. Your call.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:11 AM
-1

treat her like a man.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:12 PM
1

No. It IS right. Like when you get attacked by someone, you fight back and defend youself, and someone says "look at that mean guy... he broke the other guy's nose but he could have been the better man and just talk his way out without harming anyone", or worse "he could just have allowed the other guy to clean the seweres with him just to prove he doesn't condonde violence". Just LOL. Well, you are being that guy.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 05:04 PM
24

do you even understand what is going on here? That wonderful woman sued him and wanted to take the kid away from him because he was too poor by her standards. Then, shit backfired on her when judge made her fill the gap in his income to provide the daughter with celebrity lifestyle. understand now?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:20 AM
2

I'm pleasantly surprised by Dean Esmay. He did a very decent job in this interview.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:44 PM
2

Banned without a legit reason stated? kind of sux
/r/MensRights08/06/14 02:34 AM
2

just lol.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:29 AM
1

Well, he could have just slapped her back then. That leaves the same amount of evidence that if you didn't do anything at all.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:11 PM
-2

Why didn't you punch her back?
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:16 PM
1

Well, you could provide more insider information about these organizations.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:16 PM
5

Are we talking about the daughter of Bruce Willis? In general, I find it is ok to challegne the rules when they are un fair, it's called challenging the status quo and trying to bring progress. However, female nudity is already quite accepted so I don't see a lot of merit in her protest. She actually didn't risk anything with her actions. Instead, she had a lot to gain, publicity wise.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:45 AM
-2

Can you provide cliff notes please? Last time she said the triggering factor of Rodgers' rampage was that he read the book "the secret". Not watching that if it's that same level of argumentation.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:40 AM
2

Exactly. It's quite irregular to recive death threats and just say "we got death threats, pay for an increase in security", yet not reporting to the police. Seems like even criminal behavior. Sounds like grounds for ending relationship and suing Hilton.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:47 PM
12

Stanford grad students Anna Ninan, MBA ’15, and Jonny Dorsey ’09 MBA ’14 have added their voices to the chorus. "While an alleged sexual assault is under investigation, the principle of innocence until proven guilty and the right of all students to pursue their education free from fear or intimidation may be in conflict," They seem unable to come to terms with the fact that this debate has been settled centuries ago and by smarter people.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:24 PM
2

people should definitely understand the difference between /r/mensrights and puahate (currently www.sluthate.com). /r/mensrights is for MRAs. Sluthate.com is a weird degeneration od redpill stuff. Nor even legit redpill.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:59 AM
1

this sounds like good news for us
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:53 AM
5

"By the age of 12, they certainly have a basic understanding of right and wrong, but they can get caught up in a fantasy world," she said. "Their thinking is not yet mature." Really? I'm pretty sure kids at 12 are well aware of what is fantasy and what is not. And they were girls in this case, so they are even more mature than boys of the same age. What a load of bs.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:14 AM
1

As a mod, did you ask him? It's clear that his views don't represent a large portion of the community. So if it is decided against and and he refuses to drop it, that's grounds for reportinting him to twitter mods for impersonation.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:00 AM
1

how about telling notnotfred to stop speaking on behalf of this entire subreddit?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:00 AM
9

I too find the "feminism is hate" thing a bit juvenile.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:51 PM
3

That twitter account is called "men's rights reddit".
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:49 PM
2

I seen a similar graph yesterday. What is the original source of this information?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:01 PM
0

I watch porn.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:37 AM
1

Good post, op. If we see the world through the "entitlement" prisma, everything sucks.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:12 AM
1

IN
/r/MensRights01/06/14 09:24 AM
1

Read the whole article you lazy ass.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:01 PM
2

Good. Hopefully the MRM helps you overcome self damaging stages of your life.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 10:09 AM
10

What would you answer to someone who may ask "women only play within the rules created by men"? That's not my belief, but it's one of the first retorts this is going to face.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 09:22 AM
1

Not sure why the downvotes. Good article. It comes to show that many of those anti sex work laws end up hurting those they are supposed to protect.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:56 AM
6

so are slut walks useless?
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:38 AM
3

Yes. There is a catch though. The PUA sub-culture is slightly closer to the traditional macho culture than the "incel" sub-culture is. The PUA doesn't really admit his own feelings of inadequcy (thoug the very fact of wanting to learn pua techniques may be an admission of that), he goes straight to the "techniques". The incel vents openly his feelings of frustration and indequacy. I believe this may be a valuable window into the mind of the loser, which is normaly invisible and hidden to the mai…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:01 AM
3

I think a bigger post abot this is necessary. It will clear lots of doubts. stay tuned. edit: i did. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/26uqq6/meet_puahatecoms_incel_advocacy_and_see_how_they/
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:37 AM
5

If you want to know elliot rodgers like characters you gotta visit puahate.com subforum titled "shitty advice". Its down since the shootings tho. And i can tell you they arent part of the "manosphere", as they considered us "beta". Also, i can tell you that site started as a joke, and they created theories totally contrary to PUA beliefs for the sake of trolling . for instance, most puas advocate that looks and money dont matter , therefore shitty advicers came up with theories that looks and mo…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:54 PM
-1

.. #yesAllWomen are victims
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:40 PM
2

context?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:43 PM
14

Yes, and I don't understand how links to that sub aren't banned, because there is no point in linking to them, since no dialogue is possible.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:36 PM
21

hahaha, the ire of /u/demmian moderator, alpha male, and protector of women of /r/feminism has fallen on you. Expiate your sins.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:34 PM
2

"MRAs daily stalk and harrass women" wtf. This just show what truly feminism is. A multimiliion dollar industry, aimed at putting a certain class of women (upper-middle, upper class) in higly payed and highly influential positions of society.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:16 PM
3

So, more evidence that slut shaming is mostly a form of competition among women.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:28 AM
2

One sick man does not make for a gender-wide existential crisis. We are not him. But I believe he is part of a wider existencial crisis. Puahate, the website that this guy was a regular of, if full of charcters like him. Also, there is plenty of forums related to virginity and general withdrawing from society. There is an ongoing crisis of men, and we should tackle this incident to create awareness of that. If we just let other make this an issue of mysoginy and "toxic masculinity", we will not …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:23 AM
1

I learned a new word today: victim pimp. edit: she resigned from her foundatino: http://www.somaly.org/media/press/somaly-mams-resignation
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:38 AM
7

I dunno, bro, to me this whole entitlement talk is nonsense. Most men don't feel entitled to relationship of women, but on the contrary, the common theme is unworthiness and low self esteem. Scarcity of options, perceived or real. They feel they have a chance with one woman and latch onto her like a nit. Of course breaking up with a motherfucker like that is going to be a huge deal, because he is too attached, out of neediness and lack of options.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:09 AM
6

Catcalls are retarded, but how is that "entitlement to women's bodies"? sounds more like free speech to me. ass slaps are men constantly ass slapping stranger women, with societal approval? Where? The entire concept of being 'friendzoned'. Not familiar with that in depth but I guess getting friendzoned is when you have a romantic or sexual interested in a girl and she says she want's to be friends only. I fail to see where is the male entitlement in that. All of these are little ways in which so…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:44 AM
-1

this.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:29 AM
1

wow, turned up she was big a scam artist.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:28 AM
-4

doubtful.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:42 AM
3

Hair is more important than head. Standard feminism.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:39 AM
39

Yeah. The manhate after the shooting has been impressive, even scary. I never really felt under attack for being a men, but afther all this #yesallwomen and media anti MRA savagery, I definitely do.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:34 AM
0

the other option is regretted consensual sex.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:18 AM
-7

There was some male feminist on this sub talking about how men need to learn to "handle rejection better" in order to avoid going Rodgers on women. Well, this is how women handle rejection: they find the way to do the most possible damage.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:39 AM
1

you are dumb.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:37 AM
0

Agreed. And you can always resort to screenshots for that.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:57 PM
4

And honestly, if a friend of mine accused me of being a rapist, or even a potential rapist, that's grounds for ending the friendship immediately, regardless of how long or how well I've known the person. What an incredibly offensive thing to say to somebody. this
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:37 PM
2

That's the attitude of only a minority of men. Conversely, rather considerable part of the female population have that very attitude towards men
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:09 PM
3

then why do the spend so much time and money and energy trying to win over a woman's heart. Exactly. I have been surfing around opinion websites and some white knightish articles that read "stop trying to WIN women over, that's male entitlement" and that sort of bs. Well, it's pretty clear to me that when you are working to win something over, you are doing that NOT from a position of power. Compare that to the female rapist, usually enabled and condoned by society, or just observe in any sort o…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:03 PM
1

That's also one of the reasons why female on male sexual assault, harassment and rape are ignored or marginalized Excellent example. This is the most blatant evidence of female entitlement to men's bodies.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:59 PM
3

Can you show us a few real world, tangible examples that makes a rational mind say "yes, that's entitlement to women's bodies"?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:57 PM
0

This is because you have been already brainwashed by the media.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:53 PM
3

Separating amicably is in no way mutually exclusive with being adviced by a lawyer. But yeah, your point about the money is good. I can't help unfortunately cause i'm not in the US and don't have lot of money either. However, I have read later that there are lawyers specialised in men's issues. It also makes me think that we could create a directory of male friendly lawyers in this sub.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:49 PM
1

How the hell you dont have a lawyer yet?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 10:18 PM
1

wow, if that quote doesn't qualify as hate speech, I don't know what does.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 07:09 PM
0

Women ought to handle rejection gracefully too yet women risk rejection a lot less often than men, and because of this they handle it quite worse ime.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:30 PM
1

This shit is old news and was already posted here. Use the search fucntion.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:17 PM
1

Sounds like feminist bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:15 PM
15

typical withe knight
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:41 PM
0

At the end of the day, people are entitled to their perfectly irrational reasons for being attracted to who they are. Men's and women's sexual preferences are shaped by cultural norms and we can all work on trying to unlearn those influences if we want to, but I hope no one here who feels hard-done-by because women's preferences are such-and-such, isn't also working on (for instance) teaching themselves to find average-weight, small-breasted women as hot as models. So it's all about "men need to…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:38 AM
1

I added this to my lastpost as an edition, but will repeat here: if women want men to stop competing for the 'hottest' women, they should also stop competing for the successful dudes. Rejection handling is important too, in both ends.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:27 AM
5

Along the gender axis, I see plenty wrong with masculinity, that is to say, the stuff about men which is determined not by our genes but by how society chooses to raise us in one way or another because of our genes. I think boys are taught a lot of stuff which isn't true, stuff about what it means to be a man and that's absolutely a men's issue which I'm so, so pleased to see is taking center stage in a lot of this discussion. Well, society just doesn't consciously choose how to raise us most of…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 06:03 AM
4

Calling involuntary celibacy an issue like this is not helpful. Sex is not a physical need, nor an entitlement, and it's not a problem for our entire gender because some people want to have it and aren't. (I want a GTX 780, I'm not an involuntary GTX780 not haver) Men associate sex with affection, so most of the time when you hear about men wanting to have sex with beuatiful women is that they want a relationship too. Loneliness also isn't much of a gender issue. It's a definite problem for many…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 05:48 AM
1

that disclaimer is unnecessary imo. only turds would think this is about symapthy for the murderer. Being empathetic is different. You can be empathetic to anyone, even a murderer, to understand his subjective experience, without justifying his actions. Also, if we don't learn from hystory, we are doomed to repeat it.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:58 AM
1

So what. Should we not care then?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:13 AM
16

You make a good point. This is a great time to generate a conversation about this. There is somehow an idea that everyone is having sex outside. However to me it is clearly not the case. I lost my virginity at 17, because I was a musician who played in a band who happened to be have sort of higer status and visibility among kids. I was rather shy and introverted anyway, so if I was just a regular classroom student wihtout that kind of visibility, forget it, I would have just lost my virginity mu…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:43 PM
2

I am fascinated with this case. It somehow feel it hits close home to me because I used to be a regular on puahate.com, when it's main focus was to make fun of pua gurus. Then, it switched focus to some strange and obviously wrong theories about what attracted women ( unlike the puas and redpillers who put emphasis on character, these other theories posited that women were only attracted to men with extremely good looks, extremely haigh status, and extremely rich). These theories started as a jo…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:29 PM
3

People need to understand that this tragedy didn't happen in isolation. There is plenty of people with similar issues than Rodgers'. Just look up puahate. The subsite Rodgers was a regular was the most popular. It was full of extremely frustrated, depressed, and anger boys. The real question here is "what is happening to young men?". We need to install that discourse in the public opinion, because it is true. So far, I only hear things about misogyny (irrelevant), entitlement, and women's issues…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:04 AM
7

Excellent post. I would also say that even within the men's advocates, there is strong reluctance to see this from the mental health angle. It's as if acknowledging the fact that men may be in need of mental health make us too vulnerability.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:14 AM
1

Exactly. And I believe the reluctance to seek metal help is stronger than seeking any other kind of help, as it makes a man feel very vulnerable.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:13 AM
1

Just answer this: how much attention is being paid to metal health of men in society?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:47 AM
6

idiots easily manipulable by the media. it's just temporary in this case, imo. also, it's quite telling that the notion that men may have rights is something bad for women.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:53 PM
1

This is not about "MRAs being blamed for the UCSB massacre", so your deletion is unfair and out of place.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:50 PM
1

Also I found a bit disheartening that even MRAs were jumping to support the "this is an isolated incident of a psycho lashing out" without seeing the bigger picture. How many more young men out there, going through similar internal struggles, whom however don't lash out in such destructive fashion?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:41 PM
1

The press never was meant to be owned by big corporations either. There should be checks to their power without doubt.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:27 PM
1

actually, you can't post new topics nor new posts unless they get approve by the little alpha male, apparently.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:30 PM
2

the ire of /u/demmian, moderator, alpha male and protector of women, fell on you.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 08:25 PM
7

Dude. We got already enough of these biased "conversations on misogyny". If you are going to blame this tragedy on misogyny, then you would be wrong and got better forums for that.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:49 PM
2

conservative sources are blaming this on gays.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:45 PM
3

This is actually an example of the unchecked power the mainstream press has. They literally can do whatever they want regardless of the truth of their statements. If they say something false, it's just up to their own sense of ethics to rectify or not. This is why preseident Rafael Correa did the right thing in Ecuador. He pushed a law that basically made media accountable for the shit they publish. Corporate owners of media have been bitching and moaning since then.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:41 PM
2

Well, to be fair she got lambasted in the comments.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 07:38 PM
6

You edited your post. Well, basically talking self aggrandizing stuff in isolation does not qualify as having a healthy or high self esteem. He was also an ex-pua, so it's even more obvious that his pseudo narcisistic discourse was a form of raising his own low self esteem, as it is a comon method taught by pua gurus and in general a common pua attitude. And puas don't characterize for their high self esteem, either.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:50 AM
2

Why don't you answer my question?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:46 AM
3

Do you believe this dude had high self esteem?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:44 AM
8

This is a common objection, and it basically reflects how people is deceived by macho posturing. If his sense of self esteem was so high, he wouldn't have suffered of crippling social anxiety and most likely would have had a healthy social and sexual life. That was not the case. His seemingly narcisistic discourse was just delusional overcompensation.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:41 AM
3

Agreed, I just want to say that sometimes working out is for your own well being. I go to the gym with the sole intention of staying healthy and reach an old age in a tolerable physical condition (and because it makes me feel better in general). That's different to trying to fit some unrealistic standard of physical beauty.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:39 AM
3

That's the better article I have read on the topic so far.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:29 AM
1

And who the fuck are you. Lazernerd white knight? Fuck off.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:27 AM
1

yes... and "entitlement".
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:07 AM
2

No. You're just an idiot who preferst to jump to easy answers and easy scapegoats, such as blaming "entitlement", "narcisism", which is not different from blaming mras, puas red pillers, etc.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:27 AM
10

"Male entitlement" is bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:19 AM
1

reported
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:14 AM
1

You may as well say "i can't really elaborate so hopefully others do for me".
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:21 PM
5

"Male entitlement" is a bullshit argument.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:07 PM
1

Mmmm.. ok.. so is that your proof of his narcisisms?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:03 PM
1

How so? I also skimmed through his manifesto and he seems like a completely frustrated kid who was bullied and had a bunch of issues a crippling social anxiety among them.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:53 PM
1

He was a narcissistic psychopath. I'm not sure about that.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:39 PM
1

This is a good point, which comes to demonstrate this wasnt about sex. This kid, besides sexual frustration, was bullied and had a bunch of other social issues. He had tons of frustration and anger accumulated. His managed his frustration poorly. He lashed out.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:21 PM
1

And your point is then?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:19 PM
1

He felt "entitled" to female affection in the same way any other kid does. The way he didn't get it caused frustration. He also was bullied and had a bunch of social anxiety issues. He managed it poorly. The frustration was stronger. He lashed out.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:09 PM
1

Rationalization. It wouldn't be the first time someone creates grandiloquent narrative over his weak motivations.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:06 PM
1

That's why your explanation doesn't hold any water. This kid had guns, so if he felt entitled to sex, he would have just went on a raping spree, not a killing spree. Therefore this wasn't a crime of entitlement, but a crime of poorly managed frustration.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:55 PM
2

Well, you're wrong then. Because a temper tantrum is poorly managed frustration, not "entitlement".
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:49 PM
2

and what is the kid supposed to do. quit elemntary school and work to buy a car he couldn't even drive? that's just the desire/frustration binomy. and, in your opinion, what "work" exactly should have Rodgers done in order to "earn" female affection?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:42 PM
4

I think this is not worth discussing.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:37 PM
2

So is all desire entitlement now?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:34 PM
0

The good thing about these fringe authors is that they don't care about apearing "correct" and you can expect at least some sort of depth in their analysis. Good read.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:18 PM
2

What does that even mean.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:10 PM
1

Upvoted.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:09 PM
1

The author is really ignorant. He based his whole conclusion on the fact that they guy never said "I suck". LOL. Worthless.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:52 PM
3

For example, the whole, taking a girl out for dinner equals sex trope is actually fairly widespread. Your take on this is mistaken. I too (man) have been invited to drinks by guys on bars and such, and sometimes they expect me to buy another round of drinks later. Sometimes I do, sometimes I don't. The thing is, they were expecting reciprocation. Same with men who buy women drinks: they expect reciprocation in the form of sex. It's probably a socially clumsy way to interact with people, but that…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:27 PM
10

I completely agree. The "entitlement" argument doesn't hold any scrutiny. We need to counter that ASAP.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:23 PM
3

Men do not have rights to women's bodies' only women have rights to women's bodies just like women don't have rights to men's bodies only men have rights to men's bodies. I'm so sick of this line of thinking. Listen dude, if men felt "entitled" to women bodies, they would all be having sex right now with the women of their preference, which is clearly not the case. So please lets stop spreading this bullshit argument.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:19 PM
2

I don't like this narrative of "war against boys". Boys don't do war and you can't make war against those who can't defend themselves. It's probably more like a genocide or cleansing of boys.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:46 AM
56

FWIW, the sub AMR changed their site logo which read "kill all men" to one a lot less hostile... they probably realized that encouraging gender based violence can turn very, very ugly.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:15 AM
8

This. And specifically a regular of "shitty advice" subforum. A forum (unofficially) devoted to promote the "LMS" theory, which posits that women only relate to men who rate high in looks, money and status. The whole thing started like a joke, a troll forum, and then somehow it started becoming serious. That's actually not PUA, not MRA, and not even red pill (though it coincides with red pill in SOME, not all, ideas). Shitty advice is actually a quite depressing place, where kids and young men a…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:16 AM
-1

You got downvoted. Not sure whether we are getting brigaded or american news already converted this sub into a bunch of white knights.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:16 AM
1

Are you not listening to the guy? He just was unable to relate to the opposite gender and this caused him such stress that he killed himself and other people. Is this ok? No. Why he did it? The psichology of suicide says that suicidiing is a form of getting back at people for not being loved. The psychology of mass murder should not be that different. He was probably an inteligent person and realized that qith mere suicide his point wouldnt come accross. edit: here is manifesto. I skimmed throug…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:30 AM
2

It can be reflected upon, though. There is a subjective experience there that some may find of value and others don't. I for one do. And as mras more people should.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:13 AM
2

Being an outcast is not an injustice, but it is frustrating nontheless. The guy was unable to cope in a socially appropriate fashion, and did this. Society didn't help him in time, and we will have to deal with this mess anyway.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 05:21 AM
-9

To be honest, I don't give a fuck about mysogniny.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:51 AM
1

Bad journalism, bro, just that. Rodger was a "puahater" who adscribed to "LMS" theory. Of course, they didn't bother to google that shit.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:39 AM
-4

No. I just have that rare ability to temporarily put myself in other's shoes without compromising my own values.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:22 AM
1

This guy's problem is himself. Period. That's not to say that there are no victims of any social injustices Why are you treating your counterpart that unfairly? He just pointed out a contradiction in your discourse. Apologize, now.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:17 AM
-11

It's funny how the sentimental coverage of this in the american TV has turned this subreddit into an army of non-thinking drones jumping on the bandwagon of fashionable indignation.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:59 AM
-10

So when he says he was resentful of women cause they didn't even pay attention to him at all, what's so hateful about want female attention?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:52 AM
-21

Actually this is only tangential mysoginy. If he really hated women he wouldn't have craved for their affection. Edit: actually this is not mysoginy. He killed more guys than girls. edit: try to articulate bitches. i know nowadays men are falling behind in reading and writing but try to do an effort. Nobody gives a fuck about your downvotes.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:57 AM
-8

we should remain above them and stand beside those condemning this monster. Calling someone a monster is the easy route.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:56 AM
-1

You manginas need to shut the fuck up. It's pathetic how worried you are that this mass shooting will somehow "taint" the MRM. It just comes to show you don't understand shit.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:41 AM
-7

I concur. Just to note, the "entitlement" explanation doesn't hold water. If he felt so entitled, he would have just taken sex by force, aka raping. Today's was not a crime of entitlement imo.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:25 AM
-6

http://www.avoiceformen.com/series/tom-goldens-mental-health-misandry/misandry-in-psychology-part-one/
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:21 AM
1

fuck off and die wtf.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:17 AM
-21

Sounds easy. Have you heard about misandry in psychology?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:13 AM
-31

too bad he didn't cope with his issues the way you wanted him to.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:01 AM
-2

It is not. It is an act rooted in mental issues, social powerlessness, and self hate.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:00 AM
-38

yeah, he should have manned up, right?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:50 AM
-13

Was he not a man?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:42 AM
-10

that's actually a quite sentimental and loaded statement. "Bodies cooling" is rather irrelevant. Nobody is stopping you from sending condolences to the families of the victims nor does commenting this from a mens rights point of view negate our conmiseration to the victims.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:34 AM
-17

it is not human right but it's a basic need, don't you think?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:27 AM
-16

yeah, man up and if the going gets tough the tough gets going, right?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:27 AM
-13

why not? for better or worse that's at the core of this guy's actions, at least from his own account.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:26 AM
8

repost of my own post: The guy was a "puahater". Puahaters gather at the "shitty advice" subforum at puahate.com and endorse "LMS theory", which stands for "looks, money and status", a theory that posists that women are exclusively attracted to these three traits and the rest of humanity is screwed. In that forum, kids analyze pictures of male models and post pictures of themselves to see if their faces and bodies fit the "golden" canons of simmetry. It is a truly depressing subforum actually.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:20 AM
6

i concur.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:16 AM
0

The guy was a "puahater". Puahaters gather at the "shitty advice" subforum at puahate.com and endorse "LMS theory", which stands for "looks, money and status", a theory that posists that women are exclusively attracted to the three traits. That forum is very ridiculous and even depressive, with kids posting pictures of themselves to see if their faces and bodies fit the "golden" canons of simmetry. It is a truly depressing site actually.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 01:14 AM
-27

Not getting affection is a legit complain. You're just refusing to overcome your own selfrighteousness and see beyond the destructive actions he decided to take in ordet to get attention.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:40 PM
0

anyone who does something like this is trying to make a point. He was articulate enough to leave a bunch of videos and writting which give a glimpse into his psyche, which may be of help to understand the larger crisis of boys going on today. do you not think there is a boys crisis and that discussing this might be helpful?
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:31 PM
0

media is reporting his "manifestos" where he attributed his misery to lack of female affection and where he said that this was going to be "retribution" for being deprived of sex/female affection.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:15 PM
1

irrelevant. there is still an interesting trend on google regardless of whether it's a question or a statement.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 09:18 PM
56

"HOW YOU DARE QUESTIONING THE LEGITIMACY OF REDDIT WOMEN'S VICTIMHOOD!!"... "errr... I got all the data in front of my eyes, ma'am." "YOU WOMAN HATER MYSOGYNISTIC ASSHOLE"
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:06 PM
7

ha, typical. Fabricate an atmosphere of perceived "hostility against women" where there is none. Standard feminism.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:02 PM
1

solid first post.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 09:35 AM
2

Good stuff. I believe though that if the guy pushed her away when he was being harrassed, people would have stepped up and try to stop the fight. I have witnessed this several times. It's like won't help a man if he doesn't defend himself, but will help him if he do.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:41 AM
10

Good stuff. I believe though that if the guy pushed her away when he was being harrassed, people would have stepped up and try to stop the fight. I have witnessed this several times. It's as if people won't help a man if he doesn't defend himself, but will help him if he does.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:29 AM
2

reported.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 03:19 AM
2

too bad you were out of luck. hopefully your bitterness doesn't stop others from taking that career path and that scientists and thinkers do their job and inform the public with reliable info to cut the veil of ignorance.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:57 AM
0

What do you think the spike in 2008 is about? The financial crisis.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 11:06 PM
0

But fearmongering is not the way to create change. All these people who only complain and wait for social change to happen while doing absolutely nothing, are part of the problem not the solution.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:12 PM
-1

You mad? The sad news for you is that you are part of the problem, not the solution. Our very version of rape culture fanatics that we need to get rid of.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:08 PM
0

she's defo a keeper
/r/MensRights23/05/14 10:05 AM
1

You think it unlikely? the balance of the risk of an adverse outcome such as ending up in jail will and the increased financial reward you purpose will always tend against taking the risk. I am talking about a scenario where male teachers would be valued and respected. The problem today is that male teachers aren't respected and their unique contribution is overlooked and disregarded. Also, cynically fear mongering about pedophilia accusations doesn't help anyone, in the same way that fear monge…
/r/MensRights23/05/14 09:17 AM
1

whatever the dress code is women will complain. they want to dress "however we want", but of course men have to dress and behave in a proper way.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 08:45 AM
19

because you know, women are handicapped people.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 07:27 PM
3

good shit, she writes well. that's what elite education does for ya.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:28 AM
1

good link. refreshing to see some interesting discussion with interesting men in the panel.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 04:21 AM
7

wow. un-fucking-believable.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 08:18 PM
-9

TLDR I'm fairly sure you're unable to comprehend the irony in your post.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 10:02 PM
-4

upvoted
/r/MensRights20/05/14 10:00 PM
1

i would like to see this written on text. i hate watching videos for information, specially when they only feature someone talking while staring at a camera.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:46 PM
1

interesting.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:45 PM
2

comment section in that page not loading for me after a long while. i must have been banned.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:23 PM
0

upvoted
/r/MensRights19/05/14 11:28 PM
1

upvoted
/r/MensRights19/05/14 11:28 PM
-5

they rub their vaginas with it so it has more value to the average degenerate.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 06:24 PM
-4

your comment makes a good soundbit, but it actually is full of vitriol and nothing of substance. what a shame these comments get to become top comments in this sub.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 05:57 PM
1

shocking.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:12 AM
0

what do you call "a small" dick?. I actually though I had a small dick then I founf it is exactly average size. if you go to those penis enlargement forums you'll find that people with penises above average feel they have a small dick. it's totally mental.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 03:04 AM
11

Hornbuckle, who served on the City Council from 1993 to 1997, has never been shy about taking controversial public stands. He was a member of the Communist Party of Oregon and he called the council "an undemocratic regime stuffed with subservient lackeys handpicked by the controlling corporate elite," according to a news story from the time. Sheesh.... it was about time a left leaning figure took a pro men's rights stance publicly. Leaving this ground almost exclusively to the plough of conserva…
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:27 PM
3

How do you deal with a barrage of Child Services complaints by your ex? Especially when they continue to believe her accounts. You pray.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:40 AM
2

i hate to say this but how is this a men's rights issue? i see no innocent man being convicted or falsely accused so far.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:37 AM
1

Wow man. that last pargaph was brilliant.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:50 AM
1

occasional lunchtime topics include rage-worthy stories about sexual assaults/rape/abortion issues in the media. jesus christ is life within the US always like this?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:33 PM
0

i don't unsderstand what is the point of showing up only saying "i don't believe that". It's a consistent patern. I would ban those users.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:31 PM
-11

you're an idiot. go away.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:29 PM
3

and what would be the problem with that?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:23 PM
2

Any kind of foreing participation is now considered "brigading". That's bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 04:23 PM
1

he does.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 09:07 AM
-1

whores from the safest places and environments of the world are the most vocal about insecurity and rape culture.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 10:31 PM
6

i always say sue, but it probably takes a lot of time and resources.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:46 PM
3

"for every time a boy has a problem, a girl has it worse" I'm amazed at how bullshit like this can fly in educational institutions. It's a for of saying "we care less about you and more about more important people".
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:32 PM
1

Way to go, DulcineaIsaWhore. You won the internet.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:45 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/25910g/what_is_the_mras_incentive_to_downplay_rape_rates/chezzwu
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:40 AM
1

For those who don't know, the guy at the right of the picture holding the banner is Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:42 AM
2

Nice. Though I don't like when they ban people like The Professor from MA. They have their views and I haven't seen any legitimate counter agrument against theirs. Only ad hominems, banning and deletion of posts. Not cool.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:13 AM
14

I concur. Screenshots of facebook statuses posts are probably the worst.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:10 AM
0

because if women can have children and men can't, and a man wants to walk away from a child conceived by him, he shouldn't be legally liable for child support becuase that's just nature!
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:17 PM
0

then men shouldn't be liable for child support either.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 07:01 PM
4

Well, to be honest, there's a lot of women who are already very motivated to do this. They got to have the money. Cutting state support for single mothers would for sure reduce the amount of women motivated to do this. Like I've said in the past - equating abortion with a male opt-out option is a dead end, because they are not the same. Abortion has no male equivalent. If you want a male opt-out option, you need to compare it to the currently available and legal female opt-out option. I agree. H…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 06:48 PM
25

Comments and rebuttals of a few of their points. if men can opt out of parenthood there are two options: have a crapload of single mothers become homeless and living in poverty, or the government will have to pick up the slack. I sure as shit don't want to pay extra taxes because some schmuck doesn't want to wear a condom. Nice. AN admission that women need men for financial mantainance. Who would have thought that. possible pregnancy is the biggest reason men wear condoms - with that responsibi…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:47 PM
1

Sorry, it was sarcasm. Adorno and the school of Frankfurt are more often than not serious thinkers and would not advocate such things as cuckoldry. Only a very biased interpretation of their ideas would get to that conclusion. And the burden of proof is on those that say that "cultural marxism promotes cuckoldry".
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:04 AM
0

Yeah. Theodorn adorno advocated strongly for paternity fraud... not.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:07 PM
3

yeah, quarter million users and the most commented post has 20 comments.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:50 AM
21

and it's still wrong that we are being held to a higher standard than the rest of the community.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:30 AM
28

This is a good outcome but I'm afraid she will get the wrong lesson from it, and the good lesson will fly over her head. edit: who cares anyway. the important thing is that the guy should keep her as far as possible.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 11:11 PM
0

No. Youre just aun uptight idiot.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 05:11 PM
-1

pussy is higher priority.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:16 PM
1

yeah. men get suck because lack of balls.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:14 PM
1

well, under your line of thinking we should barely open out mouths.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:11 PM
0

wtf. what is wrong with this?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:10 PM
3

is there even a rationale behind this decision?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:09 PM
1

ain't hypergamy the tendency of women to want relationships with men of higher status?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 10:20 PM
-1

Honestly I don't see the problem with this. In the western women are already allowed to have multiple partners in the sense that such happening has little bearing in a divorce disupte. Of course the same can't be said about men, who is penalized at the slightest wrongdoing. I would wait and see how this unfolds before making any kind of "denouncements".
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:55 PM
2

how is this anti gay?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:49 PM
2

The White House is Actually Impressing Us With its Plans to End Sexual Assault on Campuses That may very well be one of the top reasons Obama is doing all this: to impress college women, a group that may or may not have paid him sufficient attention while he was a college student himself.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:18 AM
1

giver her a glipmse of hope and tape her advances.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:05 AM
1

it doesn't matter. i may be useful for non strictly legal purposes.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:04 AM
2

From the essay: Again, according to the law of England, the right to maintenance accrues solely to the woman. Formerly this privilege was made dependent on her cohabitation with the man and generally decent behaviour to him. Now even these limitations cease to be operative, while the man is liable to imprisonment and confiscation of any property he may have. A wife is now at full liberty to leave her husband, while she retains her right to get her husband sent to gaol if he refuses to maintain h…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:09 AM
3

Yeah, /r/communism, the sub where respected members say that in an ideal world the penalty for rape should be death, in order to "send men the message that rape is not ok".
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:10 PM
3

I just read his essay The anti-man crusade. Very good read with passages of brilliance: Experts allege that traces of psycho-sexual aberration are latent in many persons where it would be least expected, and it is, prima facie, likely enough that these latent tendencies in both men and women should become active under the cover of an agitation in favour of purity and anti-sexuality, to the point of gratifying itself with the thought of torture inflicted upon men. A psycho-sexual element of anoth…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 08:47 PM
2

Excellent.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:50 PM
2

this. and survivor is a highly load word. In fact, very few people dies from bad drunken sex.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 05:04 PM
2

My reading of it is that there is a subsection of the MRM who want an unimpeachable face. Exactly. Which irritates me quite a bit.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:32 PM
1

male privilege? more like the privilege of people who has enough money to spend on videogames.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:30 PM
1

it says "forbidden"
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:25 PM
2

Could you find out if this stress response is male mice only or in females too?
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:40 AM
1

Interesting.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:38 AM
1

Democracy, bro. We gotta go to war to liberate teh womyn!
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:30 AM
7

This is exactly the point. The assumption is: male has agency, female doesn't.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 03:04 AM
2

Yeah. Women occupying leading positions in big capitalist companies. So revolutionary.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:22 PM
1

simulating rape doesn't seem like a crime to me. and it's server's fail because if they have their politics and their justice system there should be an in-game form of punishment for "e-rape". And if there is a problem with that content then that game shouldn't be for >18 kids. End of story.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:23 PM
3

it depends. there are both good and bad rabid posts. i lean into the edgier sarcastic ones and ignore the more recationary/conservative ones.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:40 AM
2

I prefer the rabid tone of this sub.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:19 AM
0

does the word cis exist outside the internet?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:18 AM
1

LOL, those squared charchaters having group sex. And that was "e-rape" . Wow, jesuschrist. These SJW are dangerous.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:43 AM
2

do you have the direct link?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:33 AM
2

Sorry I still don't understand. I might be retarded.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:03 AM
5

I don't understand what the hell they are talking about. Wanna explain in 'human'?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:01 AM
4

are there any kickstarter, indiegogo fundraising campaigns?
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:49 PM
3

Wow, the company fired the guy. What a load of bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:42 PM
1

No. This is absolute idiocy. I'm already seeing threads where the OP is following this policy and they completely suck. I prefer to read the news from their source and not some shitty and incomplete screencap that may or may not be manipulated by someone with an agenda. cliffnotes: not linking to original sources is a bad idea and it should be dismissed.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:02 PM
1

What tales and or specifc charcters are you referring?
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:53 PM
5

Try linking to the original article next time. Some of us prefer to read the whole article not just the headers.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:48 PM
1

Yeah. Friedman needed Pinochet in order to implement his bullshit policies in Chile. So much for freedom and liberty.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 03:13 AM
1

except its's not.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 01:16 AM
1

There are truth in that article though, mixed with idiocy. It's true that blosheviks made abortion legal. It's true they called each other comrade (but that's just as neutral as 'partner' or 'friend', etc) It's true that there were plenty of women in the labor force, however, it's hard to disentangle this from a lack of men due to them being deployed to war. It's true that the state take responsibility for the orphaned children The rest of the article is idiocy.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:48 PM
0

great thread imo.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:22 PM
-1

I don't know bro. I don't support this criminalization of adult women having sex with younger students. Instead, I support the decriminalization and of adult men having relationships with young girls.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:03 PM
1

That what thing should last though.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:17 PM
2

wat is this.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:14 PM
1

too much of a hassle imo. the point of the internet is, among other things, to click on links. this “lets not give them any clicks“ motto seems a bit retarded to me.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 02:47 PM
-13

No.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 02:00 AM
1

DavidKing isRuiningAVFM David King, one of the moderators on AVFM is a white knight. I LOL'd at that.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:59 AM
1

Wonderful piece.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:50 AM
4

you're an idiot. go away.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:29 AM
0

I'm talking about the host of that show.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:57 AM
13

That's criminal shit and she should be put in be put in jail for that.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:26 AM
1

They are bad.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:08 PM
1

you don't understand the concept of pay scales, do you?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 10:49 PM
1

why doesn‘t radford do an indiegogo campaign? if his gets banned then hers should get banned too
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:02 PM
3

may or may not? for women, chances of being raped in an elevator are extremely low. you are just promoting paranoia and irrationality and being generally stupid.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:38 AM
0

you are an idiot. feminism hasn't developed at philosophy departments, but in sociology, psychology, womens studies, and other bullshit departments.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:31 AM
0

Be nasty.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:28 AM
-6

stop making stupid questions.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:46 PM
1

only an idiot would buy that bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:36 AM
1

you don't understand the concept of pay scales do you?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:28 AM
3

if you can't afford contraceptive pills you shouldnt have sex either.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:17 AM
3

are you saying that not paying as a child is a privilege ?
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:07 AM
0

lol bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:42 AM
2

Her judjement is clearly impaired? WTF. How about her judgement was just awful?
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:23 AM
-6

you're wrong. in a sample of 500 people there will be 5 false results on average. That's how statistics work.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:12 PM
-5

It concerns me that you're getting upvoted so much for this comment. u jelly?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:52 PM
5

I will lay 2:1 odds that this case is a false allegation.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:15 AM
1

did I get this right? they are being subject of a defamation campaign but are not taking legal action?
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:03 AM
1

Never once said or implied that, so don't you dare try and make it out to be that way. LOL you're joking right, or are you retarded? It was a mock rebuttal.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 11:58 PM
1

That proves me completely wrong. My apologies.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:32 PM
2

"But one single victim of rape is worth it!"
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:22 PM
0

who is this bitch?
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:10 PM
1

timing, bro. timing.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 03:55 PM
3

posting screenshots of tweets doesn't count as "linking"
/r/MensRights14/04/14 02:20 AM
1

ban.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 09:39 PM
-3

Sounds like a hoax imo.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:49 PM
-2

why are canadians such white knigts?
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:52 AM
2

identity politics are the cancer of the left.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 12:59 PM
2

LOL?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 11:56 PM
-10

If the situation was that unrecoverable I would have just dumped some juice on them or probably just cunt-punch them.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 08:18 PM
8

In Ecuador, under new meadia and communication law, news sources couldn't get away with bulshit like this.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 06:19 PM
-6

She didn't try to coerce him into sex in the first place. If you disagree you don't undesrtand what coercion is.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 04:07 AM
1

I want a few of them. Where do I dowload them?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:57 AM
0

microaggressions much?
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:21 AM
-8

not everyone is an uptight little bitch though.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:38 AM
-1

then edit it yourself.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 05:26 AM
1

wikipedia policies dictate that neutrality is achieved by representing all points of view giving due weight (majority point of view/minority point of view) to each of them in each article. That is WP:DUE, WP:UNDUE. In this case a feminist point of view is represented, and the only legitimate objection would have to be related to wether this point of view is given undue weight in the article.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:19 AM
0

actually, under WP:DUE, there is justification.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 04:05 AM
4

rape culture is when you talk about rape 24/7
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:55 AM
-1

I don't understand. That's certainly the feminist view.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:38 AM
-3

I thought your college level statistics indicated otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:17 AM
-2

Stick to beating it off until this debate is finally settled.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 12:05 AM
-3

i'm pretty sure the 'female population' prefers to be asked for consent in order to be turned the on. Asking for sex has indeed been the biggest turn on to women since times of hunter-gatherer tribes. edit: do I have to put '/s' in every post? fucking retards
/r/MensRights08/04/14 11:55 PM
2

jesus christ humorless much?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:11 PM
2

yeah, bunch of humorless tools.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 05:12 PM
0

you are the kind of idiot i was talking about.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 04:05 PM
1

That's the most retarded rule ever.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:59 AM
1

but if it was a woman shooting a mother fucking ak47 on the student would have been perfectly fine because of feelz. fucking society.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:51 AM
-7

It's sad, but this sub has become a circle jerk as much as other subs people here criticizes. Derrailing is rampant, idiots everywhere, and poor moderation are the proximate causes.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:32 AM
-6

its been like that since they banned ‘the professor‘, imo
/r/MensRights07/04/14 10:44 PM
2

That bullshit "project" doesn't belong to indiegogo. Report it as inapropriate and prohibited content at www.indiegogo.com/contact/questions?category=FBCT_GNRL&comments=Contenido+prohibido%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fwww.indiegogo.com%2Fprojects%2F731310
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:49 PM
-9

There is a range within which revenge is healthy.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:54 AM
9

That decision is literally costing reddit money. There must be very powerful reasons behind it, and odds are they are unrelated to editorializing.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:26 AM
2

that user is a gold digger.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:16 AM
1

The 2% was traced back to one single source: the book "against our will" by Susan Brownmiller. In turn, her source is some unpublished lecture by some policewoman of the NYPD rape squad. Seriously, it's that vague. So I say your numbers are inaccurate. In fact, it's been found that 25% of men initially accused of rape are shown to be innocent by DNA tests.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:54 AM
1

and the ones who do is because they are like eggshell skulls of course. Sexual liberation for the win!
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:28 AM
1

Your argument fails because it assumes all women are analogous to eggshell skulls.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:52 AM
2

that‘s beyond fucking creepy.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:14 PM
2

so you mean “threatening‘ with removing himself from a relationship somahow violates her rights? entitled much?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:01 PM
2

Lol. merriam webster son.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:45 PM
3

To me this obsession with rape is a fucked up outlet of women to live their rape fantasies (they do have them, ask sexologists). Like, instead of reading a long ass romance novel where the main female character marries her rapist at the end, they now are projecting their rape issues onto the everyday world and living their own sick romance novel.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:40 AM
1

coertion implies a threat of force, and in the scenario described by op there is no threat of force, therefore there is no coercion and there is no rape.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 02:27 AM
1

yeah. because that greasy and obese basement dweller is an authority on sexual matters.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 01:58 AM
2

that's how "the professor" must feel, imo.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 12:33 AM
0

Sick fail.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 12:20 AM
7

Having a rapist is the new cool. Seriuosly.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 04:46 AM
-10

No.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 04:36 AM
-4

Jesus chtist what an awful post. and you even have the nerve to write “typos“ at the end LOL. God save us all.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 04:26 AM
-3

does the Quran talk about sexual violence against men?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:12 AM
-9

you're wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:07 AM
-18

It could be argued that wearing provocative clothing in public is a form of sexual violence against men.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:02 AM
2

I'm fairly confident Brad Pitt will not get involved in such a crap movie.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 05:53 PM
1

That's called being white knight.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 02:19 PM
4

I have edited a few articles that contained blatant misandric lies. I won't name them cause I'm sure if I do the AMR crowd will go there and start a retarded revert war. All I can say is when editing, check the "watch article" option in order to monitor further changes to the article. Also be aware of wp:due.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:25 AM
-3

"are you going to make me hard or make me come?.... I obeyed" that's good game imo. edit: is it not?
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:10 AM
2

funny how all the focus is on the guy doing this thing and not in the blatantly discriminatory nature of the signs.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:55 PM
4

sexual liberation bro. Only for women.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:21 PM
12

Actually it is not OP who is making this a gendered issue, but the NYT itself. Given how things go with death jobs in general, it's not a wild guess to say that majority of people doing this particular job are men.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:57 PM
2

Oh... DNA. Good ole DNA.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 04:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter