TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

XavierMalory Archive

View 2 posts and 3,228 comments by XavierMalory on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,228 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

😂🤣 Are you being disingenuous or just obtuse? I'm matching the energy of the person to whom I'm responding. If you want to have a mature discussion, maybe start by acting mature. To call it a "fantasy" implies there's no possible way for this to exist in reality, and I argue that statement is incorrect. You know why? Because it has been done before. I don't disagree on the challenges you've listed, but to call it a "fantasy" is you being obtuse and disingenuous.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 01:07 PM
9

You called it a fantasy. I called out a public figure that demonstrates this is not a fantasy at all.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 12:07 PM
10

Fantasy? Didn’t Mike Pence do this, among other practices that were similar? Pence Rule
/r/MensRights30/05/26 11:32 AM
61

From the article: The raw numbers of women in the workforce have been historically lower than men. But the current economy has begun to favor them, with female-dominated jobs like healthcare and education increasing in the last year. Of the 369,000 jobs added to the US economy since 2025, a shocking 96% went to women and just 4% to men, the Washington Post reported. Hmmm…. 96% to women and 4% to men. Is this that “equality” thing I keep hearing them complain about?
/r/MensRights29/05/26 12:54 PM
2

This meme sums up that person who responded to you.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:50 PM
4

“She’s a victim of an abusive home and most likely one of the targets of this abuse.” Abuse sucks, but it’s not a free pass to be an asshole. Part of growing up and being an adult is taking stock and accountability for the trauma in your life and not letting it turn you into a monster. Nothing they said is false. She absolutely is deserving of the label: “toxic”.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 04:45 AM
51

I’m amazed they used the word “rape” instead of “sexual assault” in the article. This contemptible excuse for a human being deserves the maximum sentence, twice.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/26 10:19 PM
1

Came here to say this.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 01:30 AM
2

They are the textbook definition of a “useful idiot”. The worst part is nothing will convince them otherwise until the proverbial (or perhaps literal) boot is crushing their neck.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 06:07 PM
3

One of the comments literally was just: “fascist culture” WTAF?
/r/MensRights16/03/26 01:05 AM
31

They used to have something kinda, sorta like this. It was called a pension. :D Some of them even included provisions for spouses and their kids.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 12:48 PM
57

Wow, so not just cucked, but supercucked? Canada's population (like most western countries) has been on a steady decline for decades. I'm sure this will turn it around; making marriage/divorce even more of a risky venture for men.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 12:47 PM
56

It's all about greed. The Court/System (regardless of the country) knows what will happen: They divorce, and woman gets primary custody (especially in this case). Woman files for every state aid or other government assistance possible. Government foots the bill till those kids turn 18. Multiply this by every woman who divorces and gets primary custody, and that's a lot of cabbage. Court says: "Fuck that. Make the man pay. Doesn't matter if they're not his kids, 'cuz we're not paying that bill." …
/r/MensRights13/03/26 12:44 PM
10

Generally speaking, in most countries, Blackmail is a crime. Blackmail in UK law is defined under Section 21 of the Theft Act 1968. I'd provide a link, but there's dozens of them if you look it up. She absolutely broke the law by blackmailing these men.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 03:57 PM
9

Had to delete my first reply because apparently I can't link pics inside of Reddit. :( Original message: The only silver lining (and that's a stretch) is if the UK doesn't do something about their "immigration situation", the new citizenry will soon take power and reverse this shit so fast it'll make the women scream. They'll lose so much privilege they've taken for granted over decades in a matter of a few years. The saddest part is they'll never understand it's their fault: Here's one example.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 02:36 PM
3

The word a lot of folks like to use in this subReddit and I think other places is to call themselves egalitarians. If feminists were truly egalitarian, we wouldn’t have half the problems we have today
/r/MensRights11/03/26 10:21 PM
10

Yup, and to me at least, the last nail in the coffin for them was DEI. The concept has good intentions, but they weren’t executed with good intentions; they were simply done in the name of victimhood and votes.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:49 PM
6

That’s the problem. I remember when it used to be OK to say that you were libertarian. It didn’t mean the same thing it means today to a lot of people. I’m not trying to wax politics or get into all that here, but let’s be honest. When you think of the Democrat party or the Republican Party, we both know which one thinks of women in an angelic light and men in a demonic one. It really bothers me because I used to vote Democrat back when they were about the working man. I remember back in the 90s…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:46 PM
124

This entire platform leans so far left, I’m surprised it hasn’t tipped over. It’s exactly why any group of men organizing is considered a threat or misogyny, but a group of women organizing is considered empowered and never thought of as misandry.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 04:49 AM
21

From the article: More extreme examples of the rise of male conservatism include the popularisation of the manosphere, an internet community that uses outdated gender politics to reaffirm women as the inferior sex. Similarly, political movements such as the Me Too movement have focused around women understanding their systemic oppression that creeps into every facet of their lives. Gee, I can’t imagine why guys don’t want to date screw women like the author, even with a rented penis…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 03:01 AM
1

Of course it does. She blames all men. So who cares if you care about reproducing or not? You have to take accountability, because she sure won't.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 05:04 PM
3

I need to watch the video, but have a genuine question: Does anyone really take these screechtards seriously these days? Not trying to downplay them, but with everything going on right now, it's baffling to me these morons are trying to push crap like what I assume the thumbnail is about (again, need to watch the video, so shame on me I guess for posting prior to doing that). EDIT: Watched it (or rather listened to it), and there's 20 minutes of my life I won't get back. Whole thing was the stan…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 02:46 PM
2

Buy A Wig!
/r/MensRights29/01/26 12:47 PM
1

DailyMail is a shitrag, so in order to not give them any additional click traffic, here's a WayBack link for that article: https://web.archive.org/web/20260124103622/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-15489363/single-girls-no-friends-trend-reaches-women-brag-isolation.html
/r/MensRights29/01/26 02:03 AM
2

9:43: Prosecutor moved the case to a higher court because of all the attention and she will likely no longer get a slap on the wrist. Good. An example must be made to the rest of these idiots who think they can do dumb shit like this for validation/attention. 10:30: "I don't know why she decided to do that." Really, bruh. You don't know why she decided to do that? Okay I'll tell you: Because this kind of degenerate behavior has been normalized. Thankfully, cases like these are going to reverse t…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 02:28 PM
8

First thing I thought when I read the first two sentences was: "Blimey! Bloke's talkin' 'bout the UK gov'ment!"
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:01 PM
25

Is there any kind of official school code of conduct in conjunction with legal code that you could reference to “suggest” the school stop teachers from doing this? If my little grade school boy told me a teacher called him an “incel”, I’d ask the principal (via email) for their policy on appropriate language to use with children. I’d also cc my attorney. EDIT: I’m just one hypothetical pissed off parent. How many would it take to raise a class-action lawsuit? Most schools would clamp down harder…
/r/MensRights20/12/25 08:25 PM
77

Good lord, really? Not AI? Marge: “You’re an incel, Bart!” Bart: “Mom, I’m 10 years old, and I’m already a hellraiser. Are you saying I should be trying to get laid?”
/r/MensRights20/12/25 08:22 PM
1

r/lostredditors
/r/Divorce_Men04/10/25 12:54 PM
7

And I stand by the fact that there is a sexist double standard that if the genders were flipped, the guy would’ve been thrown out so fast you wouldn’t even see it. It’s kind of nice to actually see the woman getting punished as well on the same standard, because that typically isn’t the case.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/25 04:32 AM
11

That or whatever you think would make her upset that she’d wanna go call HR my point still stands
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/25 04:30 AM
11

Flip the genders and have him picking on her during lunch with a sexist remark. You’d miss the guy getting ejected from the building if you blinked.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/25 04:28 AM
2

Eh I'll throw in an opinion I guess. Depends on the circumstances. Ordinarily in a relationship, yes it's cheating (assuming it's not part of a sex fetish shared by the couple). However, what if one of the two partners becomes sexless, and the other person has tried (or is trying) to rectify this situation but doesn't want to go down the road of splitting up (yet)? To me, looking at porn in that situation is better than them getting laid by someone else.
/r/Divorce_Men02/10/25 12:21 PM
46

"Conservatives are so afraid of women being equal to them." The level of mental gymnastics on this is so absurd, I can envision their minds turning into a pretzel to come up with it.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 06:30 PM
2

Depends on what you value. Money can always be replaced, but your life and your youth cannot. I removed myself from a marriage of 7 years, and just prior to pulling the rip-cord, was of this same mindset, "Is it cheaper to just keep her?" Then I thought about how miserable I had become trying to look after a family of three kids (2 real children plus the wife), and how this wasn't fair to me (or the 2 actual children). Been divorced 7 years since and my life is great. Have full custody of the ki…
/r/Divorce_Men30/09/25 02:02 PM
25

His retort might’ve come off as mean, but he did her a kindness. I don’t think he mentioned Jessica‘s age, but I’m gonna assume she’s also 20 years old. No idea what her body count is, but at her current age, she might still have a chance to turn things around. Let’s face it, she wouldn’t have cried if it didn’t hurt, and it wouldn’t have hurt if it wasn’t the truth. It’s a shame the guy in this scenario apologized; he should’ve held his ground and stood by what he said. Maybe it would’ve caused…
/r/MensRights16/09/25 12:08 PM
4

No, I mean, it really adds no value. You’re not talking about the original post in any context, you’re not offering a counter argument as to why this is wrong, while someone else on this thread did. You can absolutely disagree with what’s said here, but it would help to actually add facts and a valid counterpoint, but you did none of that. You’re just talking about an anecdotal part of your life that doesn’t really have anything to do with this. That’s why it adds no value.
/r/Divorce_Men16/09/25 11:05 AM
3

Your comment adds no value.
/r/Divorce_Men16/09/25 02:22 AM
6

She’s mad she didn’t get her cash ‘n prizes for breaking the (marriage) contract. This is something that has always baffled me any man would wanna get married these days. Who would sign a contract where one party can break it with no penalty and take the other party’s money?
/r/Divorce_Men14/09/25 12:34 PM
12

The hundreds of tattoos are awful enough, but what really did it for me was that vertical line drawn over her chin. Can anyone tell me what that is? Is it supposed to be a new fashion trend? EDIT: also the septum ring is a classic red flag for crazy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/09/25 03:09 AM
25

Here's an archive link, because I don't want to give Daily Mail any more clicks than necessary: https://web.archive.org/web/20250903153525/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15061721/Male-boss-did-not-sexually-harass-HR-worker-hand-shoulder-fatherly-way-tribunal-rules.html Also per the OP post, glad to see for once the Brits got it right. This wasn't sexual assault. From the article: But the tribunal found that 'Mr Carlson had placed his arm on (Ms Rankmore's) shoulder in a supportive mann…
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:39 PM
1

The girl at 4:48 is just... WTAF?
/r/MensRights01/09/25 06:43 PM
1

I'd like to put a different spin on this, regarding how men's rights are affected. Specifically, the fact that people in these countries (UK, Germany, Sweden, etc.) are actively discouraged from trying to stop crime committed by these migrants. The police will outright punish native citizenry who try to defend themselves against migrants, or who attempt to stop these migrants from attacking other native citizens. I say this impacts men because it's men who are (now were) more likely to try and s…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 03:20 PM
5

You can be frustrated, but there's also a degree of schadenfreude here as well (no hate against the 17 yr old girl herself). The horrible things happening to women (teens and underage in particular) have skyrocketed in the last 5-10 years thanks to these countries unilaterally taking in refugees and not punishing said refugees when they break that country's law. This is most notable in the UK, Germany, and Sweden. Take a wild guess which gender voted majorly for these policies. So yeah, I feel f…
/r/MensRights28/08/25 02:51 PM
10

I would think a person’s rage would be directed at both their wife and the AP. After all, it takes two to tango. Having said that, there’s an important set of facts to remember here: Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men are the gatekeepers of relationships. Ultimately, it was your ex who wronged you willfully. She was the one who let someone else in. She was the one who committed the ultimate sin: betrayal. This doesn’t give the AP a pass, but if it wasn’t him, it would’ve probably been someone…
/r/Divorce_Men26/08/25 10:28 PM
3

And I wager that guy was thinking as he’s going through the divorce: “I deserved to get punched that day, but he didn’t, because he knew I set myself up for a far worse, more painful, longer-lasting punishment.” “I only wish I had known that day too. I’d have taken the punch instead.”
/r/Divorce_Men26/08/25 10:19 PM
8

Can confirm as someone who’s watched that sweet sweet karma get delivered. Years later, and oh how devastating.
/r/Divorce_Men26/08/25 10:16 PM
41

Has anyone actually watched this entire video all the way through? I had to dip out at the last three minutes because I could not stand the drivel I was hearing. Started out OK, but the host does not know what she’s talking about half the time. For that matter, the guys sometimes don’t seem to have their heads on straight either about certain facts. They’re all very hit or miss. They’re not completely wrong, but they’re not right either. I’d say all three of them need to learn a bit more.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 12:43 AM
29

This thread is 8 years old, but I wager the joke itself is even older.
/r/BlackPillScience24/08/25 02:37 PM
4

Yup
/r/MensRights24/08/25 02:05 AM
18

This. Remember Gillette’s man-blaming commercial? I do. Haven’t bought a P&G product since.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:32 AM
4

r/woosh
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:10 AM
3

I’ll just leave this here.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:00 AM
11

And unfortunately, as OnlyFools has shown us, there are a lot of desperate men out there.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:18 AM
6

You’ve seen those articles online about both men and women picking AI partners right? The world’s heading in a real shitty direction.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 11:45 PM
1

It’s why we invented selective hearing. 😁
/r/MensRights10/08/25 11:45 PM
8

OK, I was wondering if it’s gonna be a major city or something where you’ve got a higher likelihood of running into assholes in general
/r/MensRights07/08/25 08:51 PM
10

Out of curiosity, where was this? US? UK? What city?
/r/MensRights07/08/25 05:51 PM
15

Spread the knowledge. It appears to be working too. The more men who are aware of these traps, the more they will avoid them.
/r/MensRights05/08/25 01:27 PM
3

Is this acct new? Wonder if he’s still in the “red pill rage” phase.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 11:31 AM
14

That was hilarious. I remember the video. That lady needed a fork lyft. 🤣
/r/MensRights27/07/25 04:12 AM
24

From the article: I was raised by a single mum who had to take on the ‘provider’ role, but instilled a belief in me that women can do amazing things in the workplace and be financially independent, as well as create a beautiful environment to raise children. Then, in my adult life, I’ve been surrounded and inspired by women in the PR industry who combine more traditional ‘masculine’ leadership qualities, along with more empathy, compassion and communication than their male counterparts. That’s l…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 09:42 PM
3

Men who don’t require external validation from women. Y’know, not you.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:25 AM
1

Thank you for sharing the video. Long, but definitely worth listening to. There were a lot of great points, but I have to say I was disappointed with Nick at the end when he talked about men going their own way and how it wouldn't fix anything. I don't think he understands why guys leave. It's not to fix anything. It's just to protect themselves.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:07 PM
3

Yeah, and I should slam my balls in a drawer repeatedly. Both sound like great ideas that won’t cause any discomfort whatsoever.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 08:28 PM
5

I read the last one and was actually a little hopeful that the author was going to point out why this is happening and suggest better ways to fix it. How so many young men are suffering. Then she just ends it with, "I fear our daughters will pay the price." SMH
/r/MensRights28/06/25 10:52 AM
3

It's suspicious because most women absolutely do not take on the role of a breadwinner; dries their panties up like a desert. Obviously there are outliers (and again, if this is true, happy for ya bruh).
/r/MensRights22/06/25 05:58 PM
3

Oof. Maybe shorten the next line of coke you snort? XD I offered a possible explanation under this hypothetical. It's not my situation, nor my ideal circumstances. Also let's be real bruh, your situation is far from standard and not what most modern women would want either, where they work and the man doesn't. Honestly, whole thing sounds pretty sus, but if not, good for you.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 03:05 PM
2

under this hypothetical situation, to me any woman who would move to a man’s homestead under these rustic conditions, and stay with him, is probably a woman who would have no issue with home schooling the children; she would be dedicated to this man and would not leave him. A stable two-parent household with an active mom raising the kids (other than the kids in daycare with both parents working) is a lot more than most kids can ask for these days.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 02:46 PM
1

What children?
/r/MensRights22/06/25 02:39 PM
21

Yeah, but we’re not morons taking out huge loans to pay for this education. 🤣
/r/MensRights22/06/25 02:38 PM
3

You can be successful and random, all while being irrelevant. That would’ve been her, if not for the tie to her husband. There are a ton of successful, random people in the world, who none of us know anything about because they’re not relevant to us or to the world at large. My mother has written books, has a doctorate, and had a shelf full of awards for all her accomplishments and contributions to society. And nobody knows her except for me, her family, her colleagues, and friends. Another succ…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 01:58 PM
8

The author probably doesn't want credit because she knows she'd get blasted into oblivion for writing such obvious drivel.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 08:57 PM
5

I responded to another person here with the comment below, but I’m also gonna put it to you directly OP: you basically got botted (AI). This very same thing happened to me when I was quoting a news article that talked about a “person doing things with a pointed object to another person”. You can see even here where I have to be very careful about what I say. Because of the wording I used, it was flagged for violence. Luckily, I was able to appeal it and once a human reviewed it, the warning was …
/r/MensRights28/05/25 01:43 PM
16

This comment is underrated and needs to get to the top of the list. This very same thing happened to me when I was quoting a news article that talked about a “person doing things with a pointed object to another person”. You can see even here where I have to be very careful about what I say. Because of the wording I used, it was flagged for violence. Luckily, I was able to appeal it and once a human reviewed it, the warning was removed. Reddit has now reached the “YouTube” stage where if you’re …
/r/MensRights28/05/25 01:36 PM
53

Officers were attempting to arrest a 39-year-old man allegedly in possession of a machete when a woman drove an SUV at police, pinning an officer against a wall. So for whatever reason (I think we can rule out “accident” based on the wording of the article) this woman decided she was going to end a cop with her car, and got ended herself. Seems pretty cut and dry to me, and good that the union will defend the cop for defending his life, but what does this have to do with Men’s Rights?
/r/MensRights25/05/25 01:30 PM
3

This is just flat out desperation. It’s actually pathetic.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:47 AM
37

I believe the code of Hammurabi applies here.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:20 AM
1

One of the biggest issues that not only Feminists, but I think a lot of people in general have when it comes to whatever cause they stand for or whatever they believe in, is they believe it’s a zero sum game. In this case with the podcaster, I wager she believes (like almost all feminists do) that anything having to do with standing up for the rights of men will take away from the rights of women, and this simply isn’t true. Or the more shallow take, which is anything that draws attention away f…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:52 PM
2

Not sure, but luckily at the time the house was in my name only. When it was time to divorce, my attorney argued for selling the house and then splitting the proceeds fairly, however my ex had overstayed her welcome (she was supposed to be out by a certain date), and I had requested a clause be put in that she would be charged rent for every month she wasn't moved out after X date.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 01:01 PM
6

I’d like to add to this. When I went through my divorce, I was effectively forced out of my own house, just like the OP. I was told two things by my attorney: I should not have left the house without my kids because it seems like I believed they would be safe with their mother. So if I was gonna leave, I should’ve tried taking the children with me. Otherwise, I should’ve stayed for the safety of my kids. My attorney recommended that if I could afford it, I should take care of setting custody fir…
/r/MensRights18/05/25 03:40 AM
5

This. So much this. We need more emphasis on all the things that could happen to a guy, even if the case never goes to court.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 10:46 PM
15

We need more emphasis on the ruin your life part. You don’t have to go to court to have your life ruined by a false accusation. You could get doxed and fired from your job, ostracized from your own family, lose all of your friends, and it could never go to court. And if it does and you’re proven innocent, do you think you’re gonna get your job back? Do you think your family is going to look at you the same way ever again? How about your friends?
/r/MensRights09/05/25 10:10 PM
2

This is very well written. There's also a pretty good article summarizing the facts here: https://www.healthline.com/health/womens-health/how-many-eggs-does-a-woman-have
/r/MensRights05/05/25 02:33 PM
1

I would just point them to hard facts, like these: https://www.healthline.com/health/womens-health/how-many-eggs-does-a-woman-have#eggs-at-40
/r/MensRights05/05/25 02:32 PM
2

Genuinely curious: What's offensive about that comment? I understand the joke being made, that if you say the above fact too loud, someone who's in denial might get upset, but how is this actually offensive? Spoiler alert for True-Lychee, 90% of eggs are actually gone by age 40, not 30 (Say it LOUD!): https://www.healthline.com/health/womens-health/how-many-eggs-does-a-woman-have#eggs-at-30
/r/MensRights05/05/25 02:30 PM
1

OP clarified what they meant to say was the following interaction (and I'm paraphrasing here): Woman: "Even at age 40, I still have time to make up my mind on whether or not I want to have kids." OP: "No, you really don't. You're at the age where you need to make a decision now." Woman: "Misogynist!" That's the gist of what he was trying to say.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 02:26 PM
1

There's comments about how modern women are all delusional and mentally ill and dumb Only one person remarked on mental illness, and when I checked, they have a negative karma count, so people generally don't agree with their statement. The delusion comment is rampant, and with good reason: it's true. Problem is you're trying to apply it like a blanket statement: "Women are delusional!" That's not what people are saying here. In context, a lot of women are delusional about being able to have kid…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 02:15 PM
2

How about women do what they used to do, not have children until they're married? That would solve the baby mama issue. There used to be this thing in society and culture about not putting out until you had a ring on it. Worked really well too. As far as wanting women (and men) to have kids earlier and faster, that's a whole other ball of wax that goes beyond this discussion thread. There's the current socio-economic situation, divorce laws, child custody, etc. There's no magic bullet answer to …
/r/MensRights05/05/25 02:06 PM
4

Ridicule? I don’t think I’ve seen one comment in here saying women are stupid for wanting children at this age. There are even women in this comments thread talking about how this is just not a smart idea. The idea itself not being a smart choice doesn’t equate to saying women are stupid.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:53 PM
1

Isn’t baby mama culture basically single motherhood? That’s a bad thing no matter what age you are? EDIT: Also where are you seeing men here "upset"? I'm not seeing this rage or aggravation you're talking about.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:49 PM
4

Did it ever occur to you that maybe this isn’t an argument, but a discussion? And that there isn’t a right or wrong side, but just different opinions?
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:18 PM
1

There isn’t a problem. If you read what I wrote, you would’ve seen that. I’m just saying that I don’t think it’s wrong to not want children after age 40. The OP asked “what do you think?”, so I offered up my opinion. EDIT: I see you have littered this question all throughout this comment thread, so now I wonder if you are just trying to troll or if you are genuinely trying to get an answer out of a lot of people. You keep asking if everybody if there’s a problem; it’s almost like you’re trying t…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 11:41 AM
3

I’m not talking about the genetics as far as the “sell by date” in sperm or eggs. I’m talking about a 40 year-old (who may or may not already start having health problems of their own at that age) having an infant and then trying to raise a teenager in their 50s while suffering from further health problems that come with getting older. Just doesn’t seem like a good idea to me.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 09:08 AM
23

Just because you want to have kids in your 40s doesn’t mean you should have them. I would say that applies to men or women.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 02:14 AM
2

Someone calls you “incel”. Response: “i’d call you the same thing but I know people tell you to fuck yourself every day.”
/r/MensRights02/05/25 01:54 AM
4

This comment is very underrated. Even if you take MGTOW completely out of the picture, right now it’s damn near impossible to easily afford to raise a family in this economy. You need both partners working and they would both have to have very well paying jobs just to be able to sustain it. It’s just not worth it anymore. But if the government wants to fix this, they’re going to have to stop taking bribes from the billionaires and the corporations and they’re going to have to start forcing said,…
/r/MensRights24/04/25 02:53 AM
2

OP, I tip my hat to you. Shame she’ll never figure it out, but kudos for calling her out on her stupidity.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 02:24 AM
1

I think you’d be more comfortable over on the feminism subreddit. They also like to spew mindless drivel and punctuate with lol instead of a period.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 03:16 AM
1

People here aren’t smearing all women, but they are smearing the governments and the societal narratives which makes this possible.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 11:05 AM
1

It’s a war they’ll lose. Even if they win, they still lose.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 11:43 AM
0

Then… maybe you should complain to the OP for posting this here?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/25 11:16 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights13/04/25 06:22 AM
1

Because Reddit is a very leftist-leaning social networking platform, and thus we are not liked because we go against that narrative. This evening I was Perma banned from a sub Reddit by a bot. Just because I’ve posted things here. I didn’t break any rules in the other sub Reddit, I didn’t say anything hateful or controversial, I was just banned because I’ve made comments here. Welcome to Reddit.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:47 AM
-63

Justice served. EDIT: I simply read the article and saw how she finally got punished. Hence my comment. But yeah, it’s nothing compared to the shit the guy went through. Also this sub is pussypassdenied, so… maybe this OP article shouldn’t be here if people think my remark is incorrect.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/25 05:20 AM
3

I’m very sorry your mother is drunk on the Kool Aid.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:13 AM
2

“A child who is scorned by the village will burn it down to feel it’s warmth.” Meanwhile, UK schools to boys: ”Torches! Get your free pre-lit torches right here!”
/r/MensRights26/03/25 02:42 AM
1

You never have supported us. Why would you start now?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 02:31 AM
1

Nah. If anything, we expect most women to become even more “man-hating” as they age. 😁
/r/MensRights05/03/25 02:29 AM
7

Perception is reality to them. This is why they’re all nuts.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 02:24 AM
2

You're kidding right? Before DEI it was Jim Crowe? Did you skip a good 60 years of history? Affirmative action and equal opportunity employment were in place long before DEI showed up. How about everything done for racial minorities under President LB Johnson? The reason you have DEI to thank for straight, white guys being pissed off is because its effectively a racist/sexist initiative. Its very core foundation states that a company/organization must pick someone for a role/job/position because…
/r/MensRights12/02/25 03:06 AM
0

“The attitudes about race some white men hold in power now genuinely scares me, but I can’t act surprised they feel a need to reclaim their identity and authority.” Yup, and you have DEI to thank for all this. That pendulum hits pretty hard when it swings back the other way. EDIT: For clarification, DEI was the icing on the cake that got shoved in the face of the collective straight white guy.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 02:38 AM
2

DEI under another name.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 04:53 AM
1

Funny AF, though.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 04:50 AM
5

Even though we've exchanged words at other areas in this post, I'll add some value here which you have completely glossed over. Your entire response, in a nutshell, is: "Well you (the man) likely did something to warrant her leaving you, so it's your fault." For a moment, let's pretend you're correct. Let's say the man neglected her, or himself for that matter, and didn't work on his own behaviors. Still with me? The issue that we on this subreddit have, and you've completely missed here is what…
/r/MensRights27/01/25 03:23 PM
7

Lemme get this straight. You're a woman who has problems with men. You're bitching about those problems here and trying to label men who have legitimate issues with their rights as the "bad guys" because of your limited world view. You make a sweeping generalization of all men here, labeling them all as "bullies" due to your fleeting and limited interactions. Honestly it's nothing short of amazing you haven't been banned, but I'll do my part. If any man did what you're doing in a woman's equival…
/r/MensRights27/01/25 02:40 PM
3

Looking = violating? Glad you don’t teach math.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 04:46 AM
1

…In fact, forget the political party!
/r/MensRights27/01/25 04:41 AM
10

This post is titled, “many men have decided to remain single.” Nowhere does it talk about men thinking that women are missing out by not getting married. You seem to be projecting quite a bit of sour grapes here that men don’t wanna get married or otherwise be in a committed relationship, attempting to put all the blame on them as to why any failed relationship would be completely their fault, and none of the woman. Sounds to me like you need to do some introspection of your own.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 04:15 AM
33

Wait. There’s a… good type of manipulator?
/r/MensRights25/01/25 05:52 AM
18

Still no excuse for infantile murder.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:43 AM
5

There were 5 of them, according to the article.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 11:20 PM
7

Bruh, the Tinder PoLeece gonna come after you with tazers and baseball bats for that age gap. 🤣
/r/MensRights08/01/25 11:20 PM
1

Just add it to the ever-growing list.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 11:19 PM
4

This just in! It’s recommended that 4 out of every 10 Americans drink at least one glass of shut the fuck up, preferably with one dose of mind yo goddamn bidness.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:57 AM
3

I like this opener. One out of one me could care less what the rest of society thinks about my recreational habits being either acceptable or unacceptable by society.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:54 AM
2

I’ll just leave this here for you: r/lostredditors
/r/MensRights05/01/25 10:45 PM
2

“Systems we brought upon ourselves. Women deadass didn’t even start having rights till like 100 years ago.” So… sounds like what you’re saying is giving women rights equal to men was a bad idea. Sounds like a pretty hot take. Sexist too. You sure you’re in the right sub, chief? Maybe you should head over to r/lostredditors
/r/MensRights05/01/25 10:15 PM
2

You’re confusing “male” privilege with “rich and powerful” privilege. The president has the latter.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 10:11 PM
6

Did you know every time you end a sentence in “lol”, another child is orphaned? Please think of the children.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 02:12 PM
2

Gonna try to avoid getting too political here, but personally I think it’s more that the democrats lost than Trump won. That is, it wasn’t necessarily so much that more people wanted Trump, but that they were tired of the crap happening under Biden and the democrats. How that relates here is the overwhelming DEI narrative that’s been pushed by them which is: If you’re white, you suck. If you’re straight, you suck. If you’re a man, you suck. Combos of 2 outta 3, then you have some sort of privile…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 02:08 PM
3

Pretending? More like incels than we already do? Please don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 05:24 AM
1

Yup, I made this comment a few times in the thread (you can find it). If they'd gone through a sperm bank, its unlikely there'd have been any legal issues.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 04:04 PM
6

You really do have an ax to grind don’t you? Maybe we should just agree to disagree? If you actually happen to have a North Carolina law that proves me wrong by all means quote it and I will concede. EDIT: also, I’ll add this because I feel like this has been overlooked. Directly from the article the first sentence I quoted says “when it comes to deciding whether a sperm donor should pay child support…” Deciding? Where would this ever be a decision? If you’re a sperm donor, that means you’re don…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 03:16 PM
-1

Good to know. Is that a federal law? EDIT: I saw another reply of yours where this is basically a North Carolina law. My guess is that this didn’t work in the case that I quoted in the article because either it’s too old (or too vague) or because the lawyer was incompetent, or because the judge was also incompetent. kind of a shame really that it took someone on Reddit to point this out. Still, my hat is off to you. You may wanna tell TanAndTallLady so she can do a victory dance.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 03:11 PM
2

This is confusing. The statue You just listed basically says that artificial insemination or natural conception are one and the same, but then you say that a sperm donor would be different
/r/MensRights01/01/25 03:07 PM
6

Prove it. I quoted directly from the article. Did you even read it? All you’ve done is said “No, you’re wrong,” with nothing to back it up.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 03:06 PM
3

What it comes down to is that even if you draw up legal documentation and donate privately you can still be sued. Which is kinda messed up saying that only by going through a sperm bank can a man hope to be legally safe. Others in this thread have brought up the options for those willing to conceive to want to choose a donor.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 03:03 PM
5

I replied to something like this similar already, but I’ll reply to you as well. I agree that if it had been through a sperm bank, it’s probably unlikely that there would’ve been an issue with child support. However, I will add that I think there should be a law stating that men who donate anonymously to a sperm bank are completely exempt from any child support statutes or laws. What was shown in one of the articles is that this is not the case at all. Because of the legal president set in North…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:46 PM
10

Uh… because the definition of conception is when the sperm fertilizes the egg. So it really doesn’t matter if this happens via a sperm bank injection or via a “direct donation“. It would still apply in either case so my point remains valid and so does my conclusion.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:40 PM
4

True, but if you read one of my comments further down, I talk about the dangerous precedent this sets.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 07:14 AM
3

If you scroll through the comments section, you can find one of my responses where I’ve linked two articles
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:49 AM
55

True, and it may have gone differently if they’d actually gone through a sperm bank, however it has now set a pretty dangerous precedence at least in the state of North Carolina: When it comes to deciding whether a sperm donor should pay child support, a judge should follow the paternity laws of the state where the child is conceived, a North Carolina appeals court ruled this week. This basically means that at least in North Carolina, regardless of whether a man goes through a sperm donor bank o…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:43 AM
10

I couldn’t find any statistics, but I was able to find a couple of news stories of this actually happening. Some may call it hyperbolic, but to me this happening even once would put me off ever wanting to donate sperm.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:39 AM
22

Yep, and the fact that this actually happened in NC and a judge signed off on this, is enough for me to say that I would never donate sperm, because in the United States, it all comes down to the judge and their interpretation of the law, just like it says in that article. So yeah, all it takes is one judge who is a complete dip shit to ruin a man’s life when they try to be a good person.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:30 AM
29

Not to detract from everything, but the first thing that caught my eye was that this article was hosted by America online. I’m amazed they’re still around. Personally, I feel kind of bad for the small businesses because they just wanna make money, but I guess they better figure out a better way to do it than trying to play the old “ladies night” troupe.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:20 AM
254

Yes, this has happened before. EDIT: Here’s another one. However, there was also this female comedian (I sincerely hope that’s not her actual job), who did a “satire” video (someone needs to explain to her that for something to be satire, it actually has to sound like satire and not appear to be real) in April of 2024 that went viral with over 4 million views because people thought she was serious when she said she had successfully sued her sperm donor for child support and was awarded 40% of hi…
/r/MensRights01/01/25 05:12 AM
17

Personally, I think what bothers the OP about this is the mindset the teenagers have in general. Yeah, they’re teenagers, but just the fact that they’re generalizing like this about a stranger is unsettling.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 05:06 AM
11

I suppose the simplest way to look at this, is you would only do certain acts of courtesy for those you care about. Your husband, I’m sure would hold the door for you because you’re his wife and he cares about you. He was raised to extend this courtesy to the “fairer sex“ because that was just the thing one did back in the day. He just needs to understand that times have changed and it’s important that his kids leatn this too, that chivalry is basically dead, and you don’t do these acts of kindn…
/r/MensRights31/12/24 04:57 AM
1

I gotta say, this is quite the long recruitment speech for the other team. But sorry I am not interested in any sort of homosexual sexual acts or encounters. It’s simply not a choice.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 04:51 AM
2

This sentence doesn’t make any sense to me. Can someone explain it? How would not fighting against adversity (struggles) pay for one’s advantages, unless one was a card carrying member of the whiny bitch victimhood club? Last I checked, men don’t get to pull victimhood for… well anything.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:43 PM
1

Yup, and this falls into the whole 80/20 rule. Women only want to sleep with the top 20% (lately 10%) of men. For those guys, this is a great time to be alive. For the remaining 80-90% of guys, their options are pretty limited.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 05:28 PM
2

In full agreement here with the "one-night stand" route being counterproductive. On the other side of the coin, however, why do you need the state/government involved in your life to "seal your commitment" to a woman you want to spend your life with from here on out? Can't you just call her your wife without that threat over your head? This is where MGTOW steps in to say, "No. I'm not giving a woman that loaded gun. If she really loves me and I really love her, we don't need the government to sa…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 05:26 PM
7

MGTOW essentially says: "Do what makes you happy and what is best for yourself, not what society dictates you should do.", but has some caveats that are more like guiding principles: Never marry (as we've all seen here there's no net positive to being married for men whatsoever these days). Do not co-habitate with a woman. This based on a number of reasons such as common law marriage, or opening yourself up to claims of abuse, etc. Do not have children with a woman. This one of course is likely …
/r/MensRights30/12/24 05:22 PM
1

If you're talking masturbation, "monk mode" doesn't mean the literal definition of a monk wherein all sexual pleasure of any kind is off the table. I may be an older guy, but I'm human. No issues with using the 5-finger knuckle shuffle every now and then. Sex, on the other hand, involves more than just sticking it in a wet hole (for me at least).
/r/MensRights30/12/24 01:50 PM
6

”Accusations of toxic language and hate speech have led to some female groups being banned from Reddit, after which they become more radicalised and toxic.” Which groups exactly? I skimmed the article because I don’t want my eyes to bleed, but I don’t recall them listing any specific groups. Please tell me FDS finally got the permaban hammer.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 03:15 AM
0

Eh, as I said before, I need some emotional attachment to the woman for the sex to be somewhat meaningful. I know a lot of guys can just pump and dump (and I’ve tried that method), but it doesn’t work for me. I imagine if I were gay it wouldn’t change.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 07:24 PM
3

That's right, I NEVER plan to get pussy again. If you plan to get pussy, you'll never get it (other than planning to pay for it). EDIT: Adding this because of the way the comments blew up in this thread. “Monk Mode” doesn’t mean I’m giving up on masturbation; it does not mean like a literal monk. I am human after all. If it happens, it happens, but I can safely say the drive to try and seek it out for the sake of draining my nuts is past. At my age (late 40's) and having been with over 20 women,…
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:37 PM
24

Every time I start to question if going “monk mode“ was a step too far, I see something like this and realize it was just right.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 07:06 AM
1

It's all about phrasing. If you know someone who's 80 pounds overweight, do you say: Hey fatass! I'm disgusted to look at you and you always look like you just got done jumping rope in the attic! For Christ sake put the fork down once in a while! OR Bro, I'm concerned about your health. You seem winded after a short walk and I really think you need to work on a weight loss program. I'll help you if you want. When you start off with point 2, then end with point 1, people tend to remember point 1 …
/r/MensRights24/12/24 04:39 PM
3

The whole “men come last” bit is where we all think that Can’t Understand Normal Thoughts dude can pound sand up his poo hole.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:11 PM
5

Karma’s a real bitch, aint it? 😁
/r/MensRights23/12/24 11:07 PM
1

I cannot speak from an Australian perspective, but what you’re talking about is called common law marriage. It is true I think in Canada and some parts of the United States. And it’s another reason why you should never cohabitate because if that law is in your area, you can be “divorced” without ever having officially been married.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 03:57 AM
1

This. I can only think of one benefit, and that’s a tax break. That doesn’t outweigh all the drawbacks everyone else has listed in this thread.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 03:46 AM
2

You lost your point the moment you said “incel”. Seriously this insult is so old and so trite it had basically lost all meaning. Everything else you’re talking about here can easily be accomplished in a relationship. It does not require a marriage and thus being unfairly bound under the state/government.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 03:43 AM
2

And for God sakes, don’t bring that woman back to a western country.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 03:40 AM
2

Don’t forget these prenups can often be tossed out during a divorce, as it comes down to the judge. Simple example: If you have her sign a prenup and it’s NOT in the presence of HER attorney, later on she can cry “duress” during a divorce, and now your whole prenup is null and void.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 03:36 AM
3

A lottery ticket that costs you half of all your current worth (and years of your future earnings) to buy.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 03:31 AM
1

Because the laws are still written as such that they have to pay.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 03:25 AM
1

This is the way. Stoicism + self-valuation + a little bit of dread game. Shame that it has to be this way, but this what keeps a woman. It’s immature, irritating, and in their nature.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 12:43 AM
17

That’s called roles. If the husband is working hard and being the breadwinner, then shouldn’t the wife be handling the household?
/r/MensRights26/10/24 05:29 PM
3

As the old saying goes, “You can either love women, or you can understand them, but you can’t do both”
/r/MensRights20/10/24 03:00 AM
1

Unless I’m having amnesia, your original post said that 80% of single parents were men. did you just change that?
/r/MensRights31/07/24 11:15 AM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights30/07/24 03:11 AM
15

Women have the friend zone. Men have the fuck zone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/07/24 01:35 AM
3

Boyfriend: “No wonder she loves my extra body hair, husky physique, and shares my calling as a lumberjack.” 😁
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/06/24 01:03 AM
7

What’s your point? Genuinely asking because I don’t understand how this comment relates to the one above.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/24 10:08 PM
3

Can’t upvote this enough. Work on yourself, and be a great dad. The rest will follow. I’ll add this: By following the aforementioned advice, you will become at peace with yourself. A lady partner will no longer be seen as a “necessity” in your life, and your stress will drop dramatically.
/r/Divorce_Men20/03/24 08:41 PM
2

This comment needs to be at the top of the list. Blame feminism all you want for our current gender woes (and believe me I do), but the dating apps (and the internet in general) just allow women to exercise their hypergamy on a much larger scale.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:11 PM
2

If you’re an average guy, yeah it is. If you’re Chad or Tyrone or Julio, it’s a different fling every night. If you’re a woman higher than a 2 on a 1-10 scale, it’s easy.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:05 PM
8

I bet you subscribe to the coined phrase: “Two wrongs make a right.” Childish.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 10:16 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights16/10/23 01:14 AM
8

Was watching a video by Legion of Men, and he was basically saying that if you don’t have social media, you’ll likely be passed up by most modern women. He compared it to telling someone that you didn’t own a cell phone. Soooo… by that logic, I’ll be single (though not necessarily alone) for the rest of my life because I refuse to get Facebook or any equivalent. Frankly, my only hope really would be to meet somebody through mutual hobby. Yeah, I said it, a hobby. But my mindset going into it wou…
/r/MensRights14/10/23 04:52 PM
8

“I THINK IT’S IMPORTANT TO GO BACK TO: WHY WAS ALIMONY CREATED IN THE FIRST PLACE?” MICHELLE SAYS. “IT’S NOT JUST AS SIMPLE AS SAYING, ‘BECAUSE MEN PAY IT, WOMEN SHOULD PAY IT, TOO.’ Translation: “Waah! This isn’t the equality I signed up for! I only want equality when it suits meeeee!”
/r/MensRights14/10/23 04:02 AM
7

You’re right, it’s not an example, but I doubt very highly that you’re going to find one in the media. Why would they give a crap about reporting something so uninteresting?
/r/MensRights14/10/23 03:59 AM
11

Like all people who cheat, they could care less about forgiveness, unless they get caught.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 03:30 AM
2

YMMV I’ve only had two female bosses in my 3 decades of work history, and both of them were a joy to work for. As for male bosses, I’ve had around 8. 2 of them could take a long walk off a short plank. 🤣
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:46 PM
4

I’m not justifying any bad behavior. I’m just offering a plausible explanation based in observable reality. Stop being so butt hurt just because I don’t agree with you.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 01:31 AM
0

Look at my heavily downvoted (why?) comment about evolution that’s made men and women the way they are. 😉
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:59 AM
-16

If you say so. Must be a generational difference.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 11:38 PM
-7

sigh No kidding. The point I was making is that being desirable is a stronger motivator for women.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:42 PM
34

No argument here. Men are told to resist the call of the lizard brain, while women today are told to listen to it as the voice of god.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:27 PM
-31

Why? Because of the lizard brain. Women love to be desired and thus, want men to chase. Conversely, men enjoy the hunt. Guys don’t respect a woman who’s easy to acquire, sexually or otherwise. Welcome to what is literally hundreds of thousands of years of evolution. EDIT: Holy Ignorance, BatMan! I cannot believe I have to clarify the statement because I figured it was implied, but given the number of downvotes apparently I need to spell this out for everybody. I am not saying that this is an exc…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:04 PM
63

Here you go. It’s a fairly short read (WTVO) — Young people are more lonely, unhappy and have less partners than their parents; and it may be because young men simply aren’t trying, according to new research. A study published on DatePsychology reports that almost 50% of young men between the ages of 18-25 said they have never approached women for dates in person. “In the entire dataset, 29% of men said they never approached a woman in person before. 27% said it had been more than one year. This…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 07:00 PM
1

Eh, I wouldn’t mind. But then the last time someone “groped” me on a subway, she was trying to pick my pocket. Also, she got cold-cocked. So yeah. If you wanna be brazen enough to try and put your hands on someone, be prepared to have hands put on you… hard.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:32 PM
1

Japan is the canary in the coal mine. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/12/1181638613/japan-announces-plan-to-address-a-national-crisis-its-low-birthrate
/r/MensRights30/09/23 02:57 PM
1

Only if her majesty deems you unattractive. Heaven forbid if you are attractive to her and you don’t hold the door for her. You’ll shatter her sense of self-worth.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 02:51 PM
3

Because the government cannot exist without taxes, and the majority of men are the ones who actually pay a net tax. If a bunch of them go their own way and stop producing more taxpayers- err… I mean children, then that’s bad for the government so of course MGTOW is bad.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 02:48 PM
2

I’m not the first person to say this, and I definitely won’t be the last: The movie “Idiocracy” was a documentary.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 02:41 PM
5

Your comment isn’t without merit, but all I’m gonna say is: What idiotic man person today requires a social cue, regarding groping or inappropriate touching? What is this 1950? I’ll leave it here with this. I think the main thing that a lot of people are frustrated about on this particular thread is the fact that they (perpetrators of this campaign) are trying to conflate obvious sexual-harassment (groping, hugging, touching) with things that are extremely gray and vague (looking) and quite fran…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 02:37 PM
6

So, in other words, this poster is assuming that the majority of men (because you know they’re not talking to women here) have absolutely no common sense, or any social interaction skills, and therefore is reminding them that these are the things they should not do otherwise they get thrown in jail? I mean personally, I think the problem here is that they’re trying to criminalize things that are extremely gray and vague, such as “staring”, and I think that’s the beef of a lot of people here in t…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 12:58 PM
5

And in 40 years, they’ll probably be a lot like France, where some other immigrant majority has moved in and is taking over the population because they’re the only ones having kids. You know like Muslims.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 04:17 AM
2

I’m guessing because “tongue wrestling“ looked uncouth on the board. 🤣
/r/MensRights30/09/23 04:17 AM
7

No one forgot. What’s this poster says in a nutshell is: Wanted: No problem. Unwanted: Illegal. This logic makes sense for something obvious like say, groping, but when it comes down to something as simple as talking, like telling a joke, or even looking at someone, now you’re treading into dangerous territory. Plus, you know this applies to women only and not to men. If a woman sees you look at her and she’s having a bad day, she can just get you thrown in jail by crying that you stared at her.…
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:56 AM
2

I’m surprised “talking“ isn’t on that list. It might as well be at this point.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:49 AM
5

A 33-year-old who has pumped out 13 children and who’s uglier than 10 miles of bad road, and with a body like a sack of potatoes… Also, she calls herself a lucky pick… No. Just no. This cannot be a real profile. This has to be a troll account. I mean my god that facial expression alone looks like they’re trying to troll the camera.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/09/23 04:03 AM
1

You’re missing the point though. And that is that this AI option wouldn’t even be an option if the current choice wasn’t so shitty.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:26 AM
3

Soo… it takes an incel to spot a femcel? Edit: Or vice versa? Being wrong has plenty to do with being ignorant.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/23 02:10 AM
1

I don’t count “orbiters“ because that’s not a real relationship. Just like porn it’s on a fix.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:02 AM
1

“Women being terrible” (as you put it) has everything to do with this. Do you honestly think that most men would pick an AI girlfriend, which isn’t even in a physical body over a real woman who could give them love and compassion and physical companionship, if that woman wasn’t “terrible?” AI has become an option for a reason, in this situation. It’s for men who simply do not care to try (for whatever that reason may be) to date a woman. This reason could be self-centered in the sense that some …
/r/MensRights28/09/23 01:59 AM
2

“men and women must do their part.” The problem with this statement, is that you are basically telling both men and women to have agency and accountability, but only the former has ever been expected to have both, whereas the latter has been expected to have neither.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 01:47 AM
1

The article doesn’t blame anybody because the author likely either knows damn well what the reason is and want to get flamed to hell, or has no freaking clue, and just decides to vent on something “trendy”, like AI.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 01:43 AM
3

You’re operating on the assumption that the remaining 30% of women even want that 60% of men. Those women are all chasing the top 10% of men (even if they’re never going to catch them).
/r/MensRights28/09/23 01:41 AM
5

You’re right. It’s human nature, or rather, it’s the “lizard” brain from caveman days. Here’s what it says to each sex… Men: “Don’t commit to one woman. Spread your seed to as many women as possible, preferably those who are young and beautiful to provide better offspring.” Women: “Accept only the best available man to mate with, unless a better one shows up. If the best man is taken, mate with him anyway because he’s still the best. Be sure to prioritize height, strength, etc. for the better of…
/r/MensRights28/09/23 12:59 AM
1

I’ll just leave this here. Have fun scrolling through what you believe would only be a year’s worth of handouts.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 12:35 AM
5

Looking at this, the only areas (for science related studies) where women were enrolled more than men was in biological, veterinary, and agricultural sciences. Men enrolled more in everything else STEM related (physical sciences, math, engineering, etc.). If you remove the numbers they included for medical studies (since those aren’t part of STEM) more men than women overall have pursued STEM in the last 3 years. The absolute total for women vs men in all science related fields is higher by abou…
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:04 PM
3

Source?
/r/MensRights05/03/23 11:57 AM
3

RE: I’d love to see an all female (insert any labor-intensive outdoor job here). And I’d love a solid gold toilet, but it’s just not in the cards. 🤣
/r/MensRights27/02/23 02:01 AM
1

How about: “It’s easier to take, than to make.” Or a more positive spin: “Better to make, than to take.”
/r/MensRights27/02/23 01:52 AM
1

Don’t really see the relevance here in you bringing that up, but luckily I wasn’t telling the OP to be a masculinist. I was suggesting they were an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 02:07 AM
172

I would challenge you to rethink your stance on feminism. Personally, I don’t think you were ever a feminist; you were an egalitarian, which is a lie feminism claims to be when they say they want equality. Feminism at its core from the very beginning, never wanted real equality. They only wanted equality of outcome and equality when it suited them
/r/MensRights14/02/23 12:23 PM
15

Again, I'm not disputing that remark about Daily Mail. I even said it in my first reply to you. I said: No, averaging about 40% factual makes the Daily Mail worthless. What you were trying to say is because the OP linked something from Daily Mail, it makes the posts in this sub worthless, and that's simply not true. Here's your quote: Averaging around 40% factual makes these posts worthless. I showed you evidence that this particular story is not fake, so the OP is valid, because a number of oth…
/r/MensRights16/01/23 09:12 PM
18

I didn’t say that. Reread my post.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 08:05 PM
63

Wow. Time for every common male criminal to identify as a woman to avoid jail time.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 07:58 PM
35

No, averaging about 40% factual makes the Daily Mail worthless. A quick google search about this woman would give you the same story from several other sources. Here’s one for free: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/ramsgate-woman-avoids-jail-after-having-sex-with-underage-boy/ar-AA16nH7I
/r/MensRights16/01/23 07:57 PM
19

^ This If marriage was actually viewed and treated as an equal partnership in the eyes of the court, AND it required a more than just an accusation to throw a man in jail, it would be fair and reasonable for anyone (male or female) to want/expect this outcome (marriage) after a long period of exclusive dating if the intent is there.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 03:13 PM
8

I want to add to this for the OP. When going through the divorce, I went to a co-parenting class. I talked to the instructor about my situation and my ex (manipulative, etc.) and my concerns about her basically brainwashing my children. She said, “So long as you are spending time with your children as a dad, and that time is engaging, you have a greater than 50% chance your kids will see through any lies your ex tells them. Don’t talk badly about her to them, just be a loving dad and they’ll see…
/r/Divorce_Men20/11/22 05:06 PM
5

Yeah you should read the article. But the TLDR is: She wants to cheat and is trying to justify it morally to herself by asking for an open relationship first, like a technicality. It’s a childish way of thinking, quite frankly.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 09:01 PM
5

Replace “ideology” with “tyranny” and you’re spot on.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 12:47 AM
12

^ This At any point did the author offer what the “fairer sex” brings to the table? (No ladies, your vertical crotch gash and sweater puppies aren’t enough)
/r/MensRights09/11/22 12:18 AM
6

No, I never said all men in HR are gay. That’s a rather stereotypical comment you just made; suggesting that any man who’s effeminate is automatically gay. What I was implying is the men in HR that I’ve dealt with (YMMV), were basically women disguised as men when it came to their “equal treatment” of the two sexes. Admittedly a number of them also sounded very effeminate, but that doesn’t make them gay. Also at no point did I say diversity was bad. You on the other hand, make a rather bold, cla…
/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:10 AM
16

Agree completely that getting more men in HR may change things over time. Disagree on your desire to not call it a feminist power structure. That may not have been the intention, but that’s the sad reality. Every single company I’ve ever worked for had a female head of HR and majority (if not all) female staff. The few times there were men, they were… how do I say this… very “expressive” with their feminine side.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:52 PM
1

If water isn’t wet, does that make it dry?
/r/Divorce_Men21/10/22 02:38 AM
3

^ This Definitely no benefits (and there is the majority of risk) for men in matrimony. Also anyone who thinks getting married means unconditional love, keep dreaming. Marriage itself is a love contract based on conditions.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:34 PM
16

Change “men” to “women” in your comment here, then post it on TwoXChromosmes and tell me how fast you’re banned. You’ll find that we’re a lot more tolerant here and a LOT less biased.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 12:09 AM
1

I never suggested it was a magical occurrence. What I was getting at is that when you work on yourself and you do the things that make you happy, you’re gonna eventually meet somebody. I mean I’m assuming that when you work on yourself you are not living your life as a hermit in solitude. If you’re going out and getting involved in clubs and activities and things that have other people involved, you will eventually meet somebody. It happened to me. EDIT: to add onto this, another good example is…
/r/MensRights17/10/22 11:42 AM
1

Sadly no. 5’10”, average looks, and well off. I know. May as well be a bottom feeder. 🤣
/r/MensRights17/10/22 10:49 AM
7

100% Because sometimes, there is true justice for a loving dad vs a deadbeat mom.
/r/Divorce_Men17/10/22 03:38 AM
1

Preamble. As others have said, talk to a lawyer. Having said that, I very much doubt that a court is going to consider the equity you pay in lieu of child support. The money you pay to keep her status of living is not the same as child support because child support is supposed to be only for the child. Now you may argue of course that having a better home benefits both the child and her, but I would bet any amount of money the court isn’t going to care because well it’s court and they’re not ver…
/r/Divorce_Men17/10/22 03:23 AM
26

“Son was falsely accused…” Okay “mom” (and I use that term very loosely here), then who exactly made this false accusation? If i knew who it was, I think I’d be suing them for slander (since it’s illegal for me to “correct” that asshat with a baseball bat). But no, play the clown game and send the kid away and install cameras. Mom. FAIL!
/r/MensRights17/10/22 03:01 AM
11

Because 🤡🌎
/r/MensRights17/10/22 12:09 AM
2

The only thing that will truly kill MGTOW is what we men want here in this sub.. I won’t be holding my breath for the funeral though.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 12:09 AM
6

I’d call it “kid logic” but that would be insulting kids, who are smarter than these narcissistic nincompoops.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 12:07 AM
2

I’m surprised they haven’t been banned yet for trying to spread misinformation. cough cough moderators asleep cough cough
/r/MensRights16/10/22 11:43 PM
3

About what? Women preferring to be the initiators? If so, pfft hahahahahaha
/r/MensRights16/10/22 11:41 PM
3

Lemme know how that turns out.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:59 PM
5

Comments before mine sum it up pretty well, but I’ll add my opinion too. There are some bells you just can’t “unring”, and this is one of them. Her saying, “she didn’t mean it” is bullshit. No one with maturity who cares about you or the family would ever say something so earth-shattering if they didn’t mean it, and on the off chance your STBXW is in fact this childish, you should’ve left years ago. Keep going forward and prepare for a fight. As the saying goes, “You never truly know a person’s …
/r/Divorce_Men16/10/22 08:54 PM
2

Sage advice. Especially the bitter pill on being nice to the ex. Kill her with kindness and it’ll pay off in the long run. My kids saw me do this with their mother, while she always would trash-talk me. Flash forward when they hit their teens and they said, “Mom, we don’t want to live here anymore. We want to stay with dad.” They’ve been by my side ever since, and the ex is completely out of the picture now.
/r/Divorce_Men16/10/22 06:54 PM
3

Internal validation and self-actualization. Well said. Have my upvote
/r/Divorce_Men16/10/22 06:50 PM
2

This may seem cliché, but don’t go looking for a woman, and one will find you. Seriously. Don’t seek validation from external sources. Look for it within yourself. Strive to improve not for others but for you. If you live your life happily and strive for internal validation, it will exude as confidence and women (people in general actually) will be drawn to you. Source: My own personal experience (and I’m not 6 feet tall, super buff, or super rich).
/r/MensRights16/10/22 06:47 PM
1

The whole purpose of marriage is to “secure” each partner: Woman: “This is my husband, therefore I know he’s not spending his time/money on other women.” Man: “This is my wife, so I know I have exclusive sex and breeding rights to this woman.” Way back, when values and societal judgement actually meant something and when divorce was at least somewhat fair-ish, then a man could be pretty well assured his wife would not cheat on him. Also she had an obligation to put out for him. Just as he had an…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 03:04 PM
9

“marriage divorce benefits men women more than women men, so men are less likely to initiate divorce” FTFY Jokes aside, marriage benefited men more than women perhaps 100 years ago, but they get absolutely no benefit from it today whatsoever.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 03:41 AM
16

Like the old rhyme goes: “It’s cheaper to keep her.”
/r/MensRights16/10/22 03:37 AM
2

You nailed it. Those double-edged swords are sharp. 😁
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:53 PM
5

Don’t mind that one. The account is barely over a month old and has all negative karma. Also whenever “they” argue, it’s typically half-assed questions with barely any forethought, designed only to try and misdirect. They can’t even get trolling right.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:56 PM
3

“Why don’t these women own their own $#!t?” That would imply mature, adult traits like agency and responsibility. Clearly these “ladies” dropped off that train ride around 15.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:52 PM
4

This comment is very underrated. I hope there are lady lurkers here who read this and think very very carefully.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:07 PM
10

Who said they were treating all women like false accusers? The trouble here is that you simply don’t know and the law can punish you for your lack of knowing. Rather unfair don’t you think? Think of it as though you encounter a snake and you don’t know if it’s poisonous or not. Aren’t you going to treat it with the same degree of caution if it was poisonous, even if it’s not? It’s not a chance you want to take. Or instead just avoid snakes all together if you can’t tell the difference.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:50 AM
10

Nope. Diversity is a solution but a quota is not necessary. EDIT: if you look at my original response you would’ve seen I already stated the solution.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:35 AM
11

That’s not what the guy said. He said this is the issue of having an all women’s management team. I wager there would be similar problems with having an all men’s management team as well. The solution though would be what happened in this particular case to be a more common occurrence and basically be gender blind.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:34 AM
88

Small steps, folks. How many people here would’ve ever expected a ruling like this? I’m pleasantly surprised, and it sends a message to everyone: “Discrimination on the basis of gender is wrong and will be punished, no matter who does the discrimination… ladies.”
/r/MensRights13/10/22 11:42 PM
2

Tree’s gonna have cholesterol clogging up its xylem….
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 05:57 PM
1

I thought it was called a “gunt” because gut plus… y’know
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 05:27 PM
6

I see what you did there…
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 05:26 PM
24

I read this as, “Any actions that you take (even if that act is avoidance) that is done because of a persons race, religion, sexual orientation, or gender is discrimination.“ Fine. You don’t avoid women because they’re women. You just happen to not be around them very much at all, and even when you are, you ensure that it’s not one on one with a closed door.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 05:02 PM
97

It would only be illegal if they could prove you were being discriminatory. This is just like how a company could be charged with discrimination if they didn’t hire somebody because of a medical issue. But do you think the company is actually gonna say “well we didn’t hire you because of your medical issue”? No they’ll just say “we found a better candidate” and that’s it. Same deal here. If I declined to go to dinner with a female coworker and then she tried to tell HR if I did it because she’s …
/r/MensRights13/10/22 04:10 PM
4

Hi Clementine! “The truth is-“ … you’re a vapid Cee U Next Tuesday! FTFY
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/22 01:17 AM
1

\<sup>This</sup> If a woman drinks so much that she loses short term memory but didn't pass out or become incapable of answering a question, then the burden of proof is on HER to PROVE (with more than just "Well he did it!") that non-consensual sex occurred. EDIT: Actually the burden of proof should ALWAYS be on the accuser.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 06:02 PM
3

Happened to me as well, except I woke up during the fellatio and told her several times, "No! Stop this. I don't want to do this," when she was going for insertion. Truth is I wouldn't have minded but I didn't have a condom and this girl was intent on getting knocked up (said to me, "I want your baby."). Well at 22 I sure as shit didn't want a kid. Luckily I was able to stop her, but it was basically rape and it was enough to scare me out of my drunken sleep and my adrenaline was through the roo…
/r/MensRights12/10/22 12:12 AM
6

This is also a good point. “I wanna be treated like an adult, except for when I make dumb decisions like drinking too much, then I wanna be treated like a stupid kid because vagina, tee hee!”
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:24 PM
106

Around 10:40 or so the Cee U Next Tuesday in the middle tries to play the “well they were too drunk” card. Gotta say that one always makes me livid. If the other person is passed out or can’t respond to a question, that’s fine to say non-consensual. However, I can’t count how many times I or friends of mine got screwed silly by drunk adult college girls. Per that whackjob in the middle, any sort of drunken sex is considered rape. Such bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 03:40 AM
1

Your comment made me smile, because I just imagined a guy waking up in the morning, yawn, stretch, swings his legs over the side of the bed, and mumbles: “I need some coffee and a rug to munch…” Other guy in the bed half-asleep: “Make me some coffee too, sans the rug, babe?” “Oh right! I’m gay!” 😂
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/22 10:47 PM
7

Not the penis. It’s all the testosterone (naturally produced) that makes an effective soldier.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 10:40 PM
14

I guess I have more of the “black pill” mentality in this situation. Her: “Yeah I don’t think I like men.” Me: “Really? Even though its men who maintain your standards of living? If women can do all those dirty, but essential jobs, then go ahead and make your own society.”
/r/MensRights10/10/22 07:29 PM
6

A Feminist herself is pretty much saying that bashing on men and trying to demonize them is harmful to everyone. Quick! Someone go and post this on the feminism sub Reddit and let’s see how fast they tear it down or denounce her as “not a true feminist.”
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/22 01:54 AM
3

So your counter to a video with numerous qualified cited sources that explains the societal breakdown of familes thanks to feminism… …is to spout non-cited “facts”, ask inane questions, and basically tell guys to just “man up”? Talk about internalizing misandry.
/r/AntiFeminists10/10/22 01:19 AM
2

“… threatened twice to throw herself off the balcony.” You’re a better man than me. Were I in your place, I’d have opened the sliding glass door for her and requested she please not crush the decorative plants when she cratered.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 12:52 AM
2

Bye bye troll.
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/22 05:25 PM
1

Fair. To that point though that also implies all incels are racist. Also a fallacy. My advice to you is don’t open the floor with the original comment you made. Perhaps you did clarify on it, but that is the problem with first impressions: You only get to make one. Cheers
/r/MensRights09/10/22 05:10 PM
2

Nah, folks like you however certainly help in spreading that hate. Congratulations!
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/22 05:06 PM
1

I did, where does it mention misogyny? Bottom line is when you open the floor up with, “Y’all are a bunch of incels,” you’re no better than any other person who uses a negative stereotype to dismiss discussion.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 05:03 PM
1

You’re absolutely wrong. Allow me to educate you. Definition of Incel (Involuntary Celibate). You’ll notice that there’s nothing in that definition about misogyny. EDIT: Does this mean there are ZERO incels who blame their circumstances on chad or women being… well, women? No, of course not. Same goes for femcells
/r/MensRights09/10/22 04:59 PM
2

Yeah there’s a difference. The one who chooses not to get laid but could is called a VolCel. But by your logic, incels (people who wanna get laid but can’t) are prone to violent acts or misogyny? Quite the broad brush you have there. You basically just labeled every single teenage boy between the age of 13 and 18 a violent misogynist. 👏 EDIT: When I was between the ages of 13 to 16, i wanted to have sex with women but I couldn’t. Funny thing is I never once thought that it was because women suck…
/r/MensRights09/10/22 04:28 PM
7

“…we all deserve monogamous romantic love.” Really? All of us? Last I checked the world could give a shit less about what we “deserve”. Keep dreaming honey. Sex worker or not, keep reaching for that rainbow.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 01:46 PM
3

The funny thing is all they’ve “ruined” is the acronym. A rose by any other name is still a rose. Call them whatever you like: MGTOW, confirmed bachelors, freed slaves, etc., it won’t change their actions: walking away.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 04:30 AM
11

Sigh… this. Another man right here with a BPD exwife. Also there was a religious difference. I was a baptist and she was a bitch, so…
/r/Divorce_Men09/10/22 01:58 AM
3

Nah, its just than guys really don’t like the mental image of rolling that person around in flour to find the wet spot.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/22 11:50 PM
6

I get around… …in an overtaxed motor scooter.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/22 11:48 PM
4

Dennis Leary has a great suggestion: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qcky-f_hfHE
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/22 11:48 PM
10

In her case, I bet it’s “dry” roasted
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/10/22 11:43 PM
3

So true. God forbid a man seek internal validation and not care to use the women’s measuring stick: Can’t get laid = Loser.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:18 PM
1

It’s a throwaway account, so why should anyone care?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:16 PM
4

Your comment suggests to me that perhaps women need to come back to the marriage table and make this a better deal (aka fair deal) for men. MGTOW is a response to just how bad society has gotten with gynocentrism. Men didn’t break this, so don’t bother trying to convince men to take yet another one for the team to “fix it”. Try this plea over at the feminists or FDS subreddits and see how fast you’re laughed at, shame smashed, then banned outright.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:14 PM
6

Typically the ones who yell “I don’t need no man” are the same who have their panties in a twist about MGTOW or any man rejecting their validation. Them: “I don’t need no man.” MGTOW: “Cool. Bye.” Them: “What? You don’t live for my validation because of what’s between my legs?! MiSoGyNy!!! REEEEEE!”
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:09 PM
12

Is the answer usually a slack-jawed stare followed by incoherent noises of indignation? 🤣
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:02 PM
4

MGTOW at its core is simply two-fold: Striving for self-actualization (look up Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs). Never marrying a woman or even co-habitation. Kids are typically off the table too, but that’s implied. MGTOW is a response to gynocentric society and the rigged game that is marriage/family court law. That is, when the game is stacked against you so ridiculously, in this case, because you (a man) are a man she is a woman, the only true way to “win the game” is to not play. Once men get o…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:56 PM
2

This was a good read (in a ironically funny way since The Guardian is a trash tabloid). The author pretty much proves every point (albeit accidentally) of why this “toxic male movement” exists, yet at no point does she try to back up or prove her claim that MGTOW is toxic.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:46 PM
3

Its the “red pill rage” you’re mainly seeing. Back when MGTOW was on Reddit, the sidebar basically said, “You’re visiting a trauma hospital of sorts. As such, you’re going to see some rather ugly things here, but it’s all part of the healing process.” The men who truly embrace the end-goal of MGTOW are the ones who just sigh and smile as they go about living their lives how they see fit.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:35 PM
2

Its the “red pill rage” you’re mainly seeing. Back when MGTOW was on Reddit, the sidebar basically said, “You’re visiting a trauma hospital of sorts. As such, you’re going to see some rather ugly things here, but it’s all part of the healing process.” The men who truly embrace the end-goal of MGTOW are the ones who just sigh and smile as they go about living their lives how they see fit.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:34 PM
14

100% This. The only reason women are so privileged is because they have men who will punish other men that actively go against their societal narrative. Just imagine for a moment if everything the women’s movement accomplished had to then be maintained (taxes) and enforced (police) by women. Shit wouldn’t last 6 months, and I’m being generous.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 07:50 PM
6

Got some sources?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 07:32 PM
66

You haven’t even begun to see the worst of it. Over in TRP, we call this a bachelor tax, But I wager all men will be obliged to pay this, married or not. May as well call it the “Male Tax”.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 04:21 PM
2

You’d think so, but they could still suffer a miscarriage, hence why they get to go home.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:50 PM
1

I prefer drastic, though i like your idea. I don’t want women in any sort of combat role involving physical strength/endurance. Period. Full Stop. Mic Drop. It’s dangerous for the rest of the team in a number of ways.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:39 PM
17

A lot of them would do it for far less, like a government hand-out. One of my best friends confirmed his lil sis was a “welfare baby”.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:30 PM
10

Even more wishful thinking but I think the easiest way to fix this problem would be to say to all women who want to serve in the military in any sort of combat-related role: You wanna serve? You must get a hysterectomy. We’ll even pay for it so long as you are contracted for “X” years of service. Edit: this is by no means a perfect solution but it’s a step in the right direction at least
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:46 PM
14

You would think by this point the US military in general would realize that putting females into any sort of combat role is a really stupid idea. I know wishful thinking, and while I’m at it I would like a solid gold toilet to sit on
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:42 PM
260

If there’s ever a war, you’re gonna see a surge of female soldiers suddenly getting pregnant so they don’t have to fight. Mark my words.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:02 PM
2

My assumption here is anything in this category would have something to do with our tax dollars funding it. If that's the case... ​ I'd love to see the federal government require that all taxpayers list their biological sex from birth. Then they can establish a pool of how much money has been paid in by men vs women. Whenever there's an issue that would explicitly benefit only one of the two sexes (e.g. free tampons), then tax money would ONLY be pulled from that tax source. I personally would l…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 11:54 AM
16

Gotta think of the bigger picture here. While I agree that self-defense is not unreasonable, it's going to end his marriage (which he doesn't want, even though that's probably the best option at this point), and more importantly he will wind up in jail because society will give her the pussy pass. He has two options in the "hit her/don't hit her" decision. He hit's her in self-defense. While its likely she'll never strike him again, the rest of his life is now ruined. Jail, criminal record, loss…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:08 PM
1

"... a solution that doesn't involve leaving her?" Oof. Well I like a challenge (and apparently so do you), so... As others here have said, start documenting evidence in secret of the abuse (video recordings are best, but even audio should be sufficient). Get at least a 2-3 of these to establish a pattern. Given her nature, that shouldn't be difficult. Talk to an attorney. I realize you don't want to leave her, but you need to be prepared either way. You should know your legal rights and what ca…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 03:41 PM
3

A lie, since they were never about true equality.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/22 03:10 PM
2

I suppose one can try to take a little solace in the fact that they put forth all these facts on a show. Clearly they knew it would be more appealing to the audience than offensive. God help us, but maybe... just maybe... this shit can start to turn around. I wish she'd said, "I'm an anti-feminist, but I'm not anti-woman, because I'm an egalitarian."
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/22 02:38 PM
6

How about: “Self-Respecting Men”?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:56 PM
3

Wait wait wait… If you’re paying someone to go on a date with you, isn’t that essentially a legal escort service? I mean they may as well pony up the proper dough and get a prostitute. At least then you know sex is a sure thing.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:47 PM
13

It’s all a gigantic shit test as far as I’m concerned.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:49 AM
3

Bill Burr said it best.
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/22 06:20 PM
20

This reminds me of a gamer buddy of mine with a similar PoV. They’re trans, and they said to me: “I just can’t stand these Trans people who feel like they have to insert their opinions where it doesn’t matter. I may be transgender, but I hate these Trans-trenders.” Never heard that term before.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:11 PM
1

Society sets that value. Glad you’re not a court judge. According to you, someone who attempted to murder a police officer is on the same level of value as a person who protects and serves. I and the majority of modern society are of the mindset that certain people (like those who attempt murder without provocation) are taking up space on this planet and should get an “eviction notice” ASAP.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/22 03:32 PM
2

Allow me to translate your therapist’s words: “It’s your fault for trusting her.” Translation: ”It’s your fault for trusting her.” Sadly she’s correct there; nearly everyone here (men and women) have been advising you to never trust just one person (particularly the woman) with being solely responsible for birth control. “You need to grow up and take responsibility.” Translation: “We women are equal to men, but we’re just children with boobs when it suits us best.” By all means ask her why the w…
/r/MensRights29/09/22 11:12 PM
6

Maybe one day she’ll be touring Africa and a half-blind, old elephant who’s down on his luck will think she’s just another wayward pink pachyderm.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:43 PM
40

I just imagined a grand piano with pink hair “dropping itself” on a looney tunes character over and over….
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:12 PM
6

Next time, just refer them to this 2-minute clip from Dave Chapelle.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/22 06:31 PM
2

Feminists don’t care. Their MO has always been “bring men down” no matter the cost (even at the cost of other women).
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:51 PM
1

I mean that’s under the assumption she even smells it first.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:19 PM
17

A janitor who cleans toilets in a women’s public restroom would wholeheartedly disagree.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:41 AM
8

I like this! Wash it out with hot water first, then add the horseradish and toss it in the trash.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 03:24 AM
3

Yeah god forbid you’re a dad spending time in public with your kids. It’s even worse when it’s a dad/daughter outing; certain folks think you’re a sexual predator. One of my friends is a single dad, and has a 15 year old daughter with a… very developed body. His daughter loves him and thus likes to cling on his arm when they’re out and about. He told me once how some woman kept giving him dirty looks (he saw this but didn’t think much of it), up until a police officer asked him “who is this youn…
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 11:31 PM
23

Lots of good advice here. I’ll add a tidbit for dealing with the next lucky lady… Always use condoms (duh) and always either flush them or take them with you. DO NOT JUST THROW THEM IN THE TRASH. Yeah I know that sounds gross (taking a used rubber away), but she can spermjack you and still have you on the hook. EDIT: From other comments, correcting above and below. Don’t flush them but wash them out with hot water and soap before tossing them. She really shouldn’t care if you flush them (unless …
/r/MensRights28/09/22 11:08 PM
64

Or simply: Are you a man? Yes Are you a woman? No
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:55 PM
2

But... but... that town bike had a really nice paint job....
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 09:13 PM
3

Is it true that AWALT? NO. There are good people and bad people. Gender doesn't matter. Is it true that men tend to get shafted in divorce and/or custody rights for kids? YES Obviously no one goes out there trying to pick a "loser" for a spouse, but the point is that family court and divorce court tend to give the ladies a lot of leverage against the soon-to-be ex husband, whether she's a loser or a winner. No matter how nice a person is, you won't know their true nature until you face them in c…
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 09:11 PM
9

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice..." Yeah enough of that crap. You've probably read enough stuff like this to last a second lifetime. I've only been divorced once so I cannot fully relate, but I'll tell you this. I never felt like a loser, because I did all I could to make our marriage work. Talked to the ex about drug therapy, we did counseling, etc. but she simply couldn't stop with her lies and drugs. She had done a remarkable job to hide the latter issue from me before the knot was…
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 09:01 PM
3

This remark literally made me laugh out loud. Have my upvote.
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 08:49 PM
2

Yup. The bottom line is simply that marriage/co-habitation is a fool’s game for men. And you know what they say when one plays stupid games…
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 08:45 PM
4

Jeezus I remember this story…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:28 PM
4

WTF? If there's an article or some sort of source, please post. I need to read this lunacy for myself.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 08:01 PM
4

Not sure how it is in Canada, but in the US (varies by states) even a prenup isn't going to save you. Some examples: Prenups can have "sunset clauses" which make them expire after so much time has passed. In California, both you and your potential spouse require legal representation if spousal support is one of the agreement limitations. Or simply put, if she doesn't have a lawyer present (and/or you don't either) its null and void. If she claims she was under duress to sign it, its void. A good…
/r/Divorce_Men28/09/22 06:11 PM
2

And here’s our impasse. You think I’m the one who likes arguing but I’ve tried to end this “conversation” twice already so here goes attempt number three: I had explained this in my previous comments and I really have no idea how to break this down anymore simply for you to understand it. So let’s just leave it at that. If you want to believe that you’re right and I’m wrong that’s perfectly fine with me. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:39 PM
2

Yeah you can, but you still can’t comprehend what I said there.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:28 PM
58

Sadly its the selfishness of all politicians. “Re-election is coming and I want those majority votes, so I’ll pass a law to secure them. Doesn’t matter if that law will doom the country in a few decades, because I’ll likely be out of power or dead by then.” Or: “Screw the greater good! Fuck my fellow human beings. It’s all about MEEEEEEE!
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:24 PM
2

Nowhere did I ever say that there is a law that makes getting married hurt a family. No I don’t enjoy arguing. Especially when my trying to explain something to you that’s been said four times over already is construed as arguing because of your lack of reading comprehension. So let’s finish up here OK? You think I’m wrong I think I’m right aaaaaannd we’re done.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:10 PM
2

Yeah, because I never said that marriage hurts a family.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:02 PM
2

No, I’m not your “human-find-copy-paste”. Don’t care if you think I’m wrong and you’re right. Scroll up and read my replies to you. Its all there.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:00 PM
3

Your lack of reading comprehension is beyond my ability to explain this, so lets just agree to disagree or whatever.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:58 PM
3

Can’t tell if you’re trolling me at this point, so I’m gonna run with that. Read the comment thread. I explained all of this already. Shout out to any other commentors here who’d like to take a whack at explaining this to motorbird.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:55 PM
7

Yeah, I really don’t know how to explain this to you on a more basic level than I already did. Current families are fine (kids born, typical divorce threats still apply), but potential new families are now less likely to be created due to the risk introduced by this “common law marriage” act.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:52 PM
6

Read my comment. Very. Carefully.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:49 PM
12

A lack of marriage does to a degree, but then couples could always just live together and raise a family without being married… Until now, of course. Now even if you live together, you can be screwed by the government. Makes the prospect of a family rather daunting. EDIT: Also, nowhere did I say marriage destroys the family unit. Dunno where you got that from…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:48 PM
39

When there aren’t enough taxpayers to fund the government, they’ll end up “importing” new taxpayers (e.g. Muslims, which had happened in France and some parts of the US). Over time, those immigrants will be the majority of people and will rewrite the laws to fit their cultural beliefs & values. One way or another, western women will have men as their saviors, but it may bite them in the ass if those men look at women as being subservient (again, Muslims already do this in other countries).
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:30 PM
5

Yeah which i said. If it’s only enforced against men (which is likely the case) then its even worse because its both destructive and blatantly sexist to boot.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:26 PM
10

If it applied equally to both men and women (and was enforced as such) it wouldn't be as bad, but it's still bad for the country as a whole in the long-term. Even if we believe the above that a woman would be held accountable as well (ha ha), the chief problem here is that people will stop wanting to live together. They already don't want to get married because of the same threat to their financial security, now it's if they even live together for 3 years. Prior to this law, people could still l…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:16 PM
30

And so it begins… Congratulations to the Canadian government for doing their utmost to destroy the cornerstone of any nation: The Family Unit. Pretty soon you’re gonna see a bachelor tax… Then you’ll likely see an influx of Canadian men migrating to the US since (for now) this bullshit doesn’t apply in the majority of states.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 04:05 PM
10

Not all human lives are valuable. But if you believe that people who open fire on the police first with an attempt to kill them should still stay alive (and they weren’t threatened), well that’s your opinion I guess but it’s an unpopular one.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/09/22 02:47 AM
28

Yup. As one video comment said: “And nothing of value was lost.”
/r/PussyPassDenied27/09/22 09:00 PM
5

Probably dating myself here, but it’s time to form the group that Al Bundy and his buddies made (the show Married… With Children): NO MA’AM National Organization of Men Against Amazonian Masterhood
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:12 PM
2

Aint enough water in the state to put out the flames that would scorch said comment section.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 11:07 PM
4

It’ll go the same was as Rome. The US will just import people to make up the tax base, and those people will bring a different culture with them. Eventually their descendants will be the majority and rewrite the laws. The muslims are already doing this to a degree in the US and France.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:36 PM
1

Minimum wage was left at the same level and not increased along with inflation for many years; therein lies the problem. They’ll need to increase minimum wage so people aren’t on starvation. Sounds like a much better decision to make with the extra money instead of doling it out for free as UBI.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:34 PM
-2

It’s a bad idea in general. The United States got a taste of this when Covid was in full swing and the government was paying people. There were a ton of small time jobs that were no longer being filled because those who had to fill them were now getting a paycheck for free. EDIT: To those downvoting me, my comment does not amount to “screw the lower class”. It’s about paying people fair and adequate compensation for their work. Giving money to someone (male or female) for doing nothing but exist…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:52 PM
6

Another good article on that site: https://avoiceformen.com/featured/mgtow-and-female-disapproval-2-2/ The author herself admits (in a roundabout way) why men are “leaving the game.” Who on earth will fund all these programs (e.g. “UBI” for homeless women) when the vast majority of the taxpayer base has not only left, but won’t sire anymore children who would grow up to be taxpayers themselves?
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:42 PM
3

Those moments in life when you wish you had an adult’s wit when you were a kid… “Oh she’s just bullying you and causing physical injury because she’s crushing on you.” The response we all wish we could give to that line: “Ooohhh is that all? Well she is kinda cute and I think I like her too. How about I pull her hair then shove her down a flight of stairs? I mean I thought about straight up beating her with a bat, but I want to be subtle.” Double Standards indeed.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 12:04 AM
3

Yup. It’s a small-time inconvenience at best, but its still a permanent small-time inconvenience. They know it too, just don’t want to admit it how much it sucks to carry it around forever. But misery loves company.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 10:58 PM
10

Sure it’s not that bad, but that doesn’t mean people want it. Especially if their partner has it and just can’t be bothered to inform them. Regardless of how bad or not-bad it is, it’s your obligation as a decent person to tell your partner and then let them decide to take the risk.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 10:41 PM
6

An old saying scribbled on a restroom wall comes to mind: ”No matter how good looking she is, *someone** is tired of her shit.”*
/r/MensRights14/09/22 10:22 PM
2

🤣
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:07 PM
1

I wholeheartedly agree there's too much polarization lately (especially in politics) and that compromise is needed to get anywhere, regardless of the issue at hand. Having said that, feminism needs to die. Harsh? Here's why. Feminism has never been about true equality; not even since its inception. Their slogan is a lie. It's been about equality for women only (it's in the very name, the "fem" in feminism") and only when that equality suits them. I can grant it had to be only about women back wh…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 08:19 PM
14

As someone else said, the stigma will follow him around even afterwards. Not to mention all the grief the guy went through during the period when he should’ve been granted the same anonymity as the accuser.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 07:14 PM
1

The problem is that you say it’s a good community but all I’ve seen within it is blatant sexism that tries to label women as the issue. I am yet to see a truly positive message come from the MGTOW community that doesn’t involve the implication of women being a burden. You literally drive the point of ‘free from women’ in declaration about how MGTOW doesn’t have a distaste for women. To the first point you've made, did you not see any of my other messages about what MGTOW is in this post? How it'…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:32 PM
1

Pretty much, but i like that it talks a lot about self-improvement on the basis of finding validation from one’s self. They didn’t invent it of course, but it’s a key concept to follow.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:44 PM
27

How about we not charge anyone if there’s no supporting evidence. Word alone isn’t enough. Ever heard of the Salem Witch Trials? But sure, my sense of reality is warped. Just hashtag believeallwomen right? Try that one more time, albeit somewhere else.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:41 PM
30

Exactly? So he does get to suffer because he’s a guy? And you think the guy gets to move on with his life? Just realized though that (based on the account info) this is likely just a throwaway troll account, so yeah, I doubt you’re here to look at the real issue being presented.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:36 PM
41

It’s possible, but he was cleared. Should he be condemned in the interim? Nope. Yet he gets to suffer because of his gender.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:33 PM
54

Can’t prove a negative, but meanwhile this guy’s life was wrecked because she had a bad dream and projected it with no evidence either. What does society say to him? “Too bad you’re a man.” What does society say to her? “…”
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:25 PM
2

Be wary of prenups; they're not as bulletproof as they seem. Make sure she has her own attorney present, or she can claim you made her sign it under duress (yes this is real, google it and you'll find many law firms touting it). Also some states (like California) have "sunset clauses" which means the prenup will expire after X number of days, so she need only wait it out and then it's completely null and void. Best way to avoid getting screwed over if a marriage fails is to just not get married.…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:43 PM
1

A different post on MensRights had brought this up. There were actually numerous cases (according to the commentors in the thread) who said their doctor wouldn't give it to them unless they had permission from their wives (even if they weren't married). Chew on that...
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:11 PM
2

Get him for everything he has, both monetarily/property and whatever he hold dear (like the kids). Typically more the former, and the latter are used as leverage for the former.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 12:56 PM
3

Go on. Please share yours with the person who asked.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 12:38 PM
1

MGTOW is not a distaste for women. It’s self-actualization, coupled with no marriage or co-habitatation with women. The latter doesn’t mean hating women; it’s protecting one’s self from laws that are gender biased. My best friend is female and she totally understands my point of view. It seems your issues are a bit deeper, and I would agree that mental health and therapy should be first priority for you. Good luck.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 12:36 PM
3

I’m amazed there hasn’t been a violent revolution. Here in the states, you can bet there would be a bunch of people with guns if men were being forced to get married. or as some people on the Internet have called it, “hockey mask time.“
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:27 AM
4

I’ll share mine: “Thirsty, misguided, canon fodder.”
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:23 AM
4

To be honest I’m surprised she didn’t say you were “internalizing your misogyny“. 🤣
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:21 AM
1

I understood it wasn’t directed towards me and I deeply appreciate you saying it. It’s extremely important that men realize exactly what you said, that human beings don’t necessarily owe other human beings anything based upon what’s between their legs. I think that’s very critical and it goes both ways.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:06 AM
6

Much obliged. :-) Just a man though. A father who’s had to fight for his kids, who was nearly raped by a woman I thought was a dear friend, and has seen first-hand (from those and other situations) just how serious Men’s Rights are for the good of ALL peoples.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:04 AM
6

Correct. Frightened bitches, to be more precise. Unfortunately I cannot recall the title of the video but I bet anything you could find it with a little searching. There was a video debate about the rights for sex robots. In a nutshell it was feminists decrying the manufacture of sex dolls with AI in that it would be unfair or sexist or a violation of human rights (if you can believe human rights apply to a doll) for these sex dolls to be made for men to use (no mention about the male dolls for …
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:32 AM
6

Thank you for that. I agree also that both men and women strive for this goal. Also on the “bitterness the harbor “front, that was one of the things that was mentioned in the “about section “in the old MGTOW channel. In essence, it said: “This is like the burn ward in a hospital. You’re going to see some things here that are shocking and appalling and may well disgust you, but please understand that there are people who are trying to heal from trauma.“ To be clear, I’m not giving a pass to peopl…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:10 AM
3

Australia is just hastening the inevitable. More aussie men will start saying (albeit more eloquently than me): “I love you, but not enough to risk an ass-pounding by the government, so we can’t live together.” Of course, the government will do what they do best: Double Down on Stupid, and then make it “common law marriage” if the two have a child together. Guess what happens next…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:07 AM
1

Correct. You can be MGTOW, still enjoy heterosexual sex, and still get your validation as a human being from within yourself.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:56 AM
3

They aren’t though, because their validation in nearly EVERY case comes from what a woman thinks of them. They would jump at the opportunity to get laid, usually at the cost of their own self-worth. This is why MGTOW != Incels, or vice versa. Never.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:44 AM
19

It’s their means to silence people. Shame, blame, ostracize, etc. They don’t want the idea spreading so they try to demonize it and simplify that demonization. “Blue Pill” men just hear, “Oh those guys are a bunch of woman-hating incels! You want no part of that,” and because those guys are still heavily swayed by external validation, they accept that lie without question. It’s pathetic really. MGTOW isn’t a movement (like feminism) but a reaction to very shitty circumstances on a societal level…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:42 AM
2

The vast majority of women are very materialistic (there’s a statistic out there somewhere but they’re basically the majority consumers), so it makes sense that their means of validation would be largely external. I’ve only known a couple women in my life on a personal level who were truly able to embrace self-actualization; one of them is my best friend and in her late 50’s, so perhaps its… forced?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:38 AM
7

Very true. In the correct case though, involuntary celibate, there were some who expressed “angst” for being in their position. And of course, their anger was pointed out by the mainstream to be labeled against everyone around them. Guilt by association.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 02:34 AM
25

Because unfortunately the MGTOW groups were infiltrated by a lot of bigotry and incels and woman haters. Tends to happen with all kinds of groups. The extremists who come in there attract all the attention. Also, the mainstream is flat out scared of MGTOW because it’s men literally walking away from their “default role” in society. This scares the crap out of them because if enough men catch on, they (feminists) will no longer hold power with the standard tools they’ve utilized for decades (powe…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 10:03 PM
8

Very true. I’m reminded of the book: “The Missing Piece” by Shel Silverstein. Basically you need to be whole and complete with yourself before you try and get somebody else. it’s a good philosophy for both sexes
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:59 PM
2

Must depend on the state. In VA, they are still very back-asswards in their thinking.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:56 PM
3

Taking a person for everything they have (monetarily/property aspect).
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:55 PM
5

Get him for everything he has, both monetarily/property and whatever he hold dear (like the kids). Typically more the former, and the latter are used as leverage for the former.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:54 PM
3

This post is so underrated. Have my upvote. Been saying this forever. Why do you need the government involved in your relationship? Ya scared they’re gonna bail on you?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:52 PM
10

Look up Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. MGTOW in a nutshell is about the top of the pyramid (self-actualization) along with never marrying (or in some states co-habitating) with women. Or: It’s about finding validation from yourself and not using the opposite sex as your measuring stick.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:49 PM
93

Yes and no. Never get married or live with one (because in some states that can be a common-law marriage). Some men prefer to go "monk mode" and not bother with them at all, others will date casually but keep them at a safe distance. It's unfortunate, because it's not like all women are out to get all men. However society and the law give all of them a loaded gun which they can use to shoot you at any time. MGTOW is basically the bullet proof vest. The real philosophy behind MGTOW is self-actual…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:42 PM
26

Look up Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. MGTOW in a nutshell is about the top of the pyramid (self-actualization) along with never marrying (or in some states co-habitating) with women. Or: It’s about finding validation from yourself and not using the opposite sex as your measuring stick.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:35 PM
24

An old classic that ought to be taught to EVERY kid (male or female) about to turn legal age.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:30 PM
12

^ This right here. God forbid you define your self-worth by things you yourself care about, instead of what someone else (in this case women) deem is of value in you. Times like these I’m glad I had my fun in my younger days. Guess I’m just an old “VolCel”’ who could care less about squeezing juice anymore.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:25 PM
1

Whatever you say. You know better after all. Since you can read minds, you must know everything posted by the OP was either an exaggeration or outright fabrication. Heck you can read my mind too, so I’m sure you know what I’m about to do next.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 11:00 AM
1

I’m sure they have. I bet they also would know better than to say, “We’re not coming down there.”
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:43 AM
1

So you’re a mind reader now? Uh huh. OP is sexist? May as well throw out everything said here. I’ve said it several times already, my remarks still stand.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:41 AM
24

Agreed. It’s all under the Conclusion section, but here’s one snippet: Furthermore, studies of human infants report evidence that females exhibit higher rates than males in various rudimentary forms of empathy, such as contagious crying, neonatal imitation, social referencing (i.e., looking to social partners for information in ambiguous situations), and general social interest and sensitivity.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:02 PM
1

You accuse me of making assumptions, then after I prove that's not true, you go and make them yourself. If they had said something like what I suggested was an appropriate response, "Please remain calm, we're calling for backup," that would've been minimal if acceptable. But no, they said, "We're not coming down there!" Hmm.. I wonder why not? Whether there's a valid reason (caution) or not (fear), you don't say that to a victim who's traumatized. You could potentially put them into shock. Fact …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:46 PM
1

Not my assumption though. Again, seems you’re grasping at straws here to make your point. My point remains valid. Gender not withstanding if you can’t do your job and it’s gonna cost somebody their life then you shouldn’t do it. Period, full stop, mic drop.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:33 PM
1

Actually yes he did. Read what was written in the title.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:31 PM
1

Any assumption to make the case right?
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:18 AM
2

I’d like to hope your daughter would’ve said something smart to the OP like, “Please remain calm sir. We’ve called for backup.” But that wasn’t the case here. Per the OP, these women simply refused to help him out of fear! That “fear” could cost a life one day, gender notwithstanding. If you can’t do the job, then don’t do it. Hope they’re all shitcanned for that.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:34 AM
2

I found this intriguing, so I did a little research. TL;DR: Childbirth may have been dangerous, but war took WAY more men’s lives than childbirth did women. In the Civil War: 2% of the population died (620,000 men). https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/civil-war-casualties There were 700 deaths from childbirth per 100,000 during the 1800s. https://ourworldindata.org/maternal-mortality#how-has-maternal-mortality-changed-over-the-long-term In 1800, the total US population was 5.3 million. C…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:25 AM
4

Wait... "horny" is an emotion? I thought it was a biological action (like sleepy or hungry). AWESOME!
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:53 PM
6

Nope ​ https://circumcision.org/how-male-circumcision-harms-women/
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:46 PM
7

Expecting TwoX to have any sort of logic or reasoning behind their "messages" is like going to a sulfur mine and expecting a breath of fresh air.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 06:25 PM
1

Sis, was this too complicated for you? There's really no need to cry about it, but then I guess that's a "fragile ego" for you. What's hilarious to me is everything you've proclaimed here actually applies to whatever that thing is you look at in the mirror every morning. I suggest you start there with your "moral obligations". Was that clear enough?
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:04 AM
1

Moral obligation? Well i guess morals (much like opinions) can be rather skewed based on one’s self-inflation of importance. It’s your time to waste after all. Also who said anything about being offended by your choice of words? It is quite the apt choice I’d use for your actions here to attempt to troll and/or feel self-righteous.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:44 AM
2

Obligated? Did you sign a contract that requires you to stick your nose in where you don’t want to, or perhaps you just get a sense of self-satisfaction by trying to apply your opinion as judgement on others? And you call the people here weird. Or sad? Oof.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:10 PM
11

That’s equality!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/22 10:50 PM
2

I wager it’s more to do with the fact that fewer people are getting married.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 09:53 PM
4

You know you can turn those notifications for certain subreddits off, right? EDIT: Unless of course, you seem to enjoy being “disgusted” by what you see here.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:48 PM
3

Based on that reasoning, it begs the question: “Why are you here?”
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:30 PM
1

Yup. When she says, “I think we should start seeing other people,” rest assured she’s already picked a stallion out of the herd and if she aint ridin’ him yet, she has pulled a saddle out of the barn.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 04:28 PM
13

Interesting (although blatantly obvious) strawman. As a man I have never raped a woman, and yet somehow despite my never committing said crime, I’m at the mercy of biased laws regarding rape in that men can rape women but not vice versa. How am I at the mercy of this, you ask? When I was in my early 20s a woman attempted to rape me. Do you honestly think that had she succeeded and I had filed a report that anyone would’ve believed me? Also, here’s an example of law from 1975 RE men being held li…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:17 AM
18

Holy crap this is underrated. Have my upvote. Reminds me of some time ago when there was a call for all women to go on strike for a day; see how well the world would operate. Just imagine if all men went on strike for a day…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 12:16 AM
2

Is the 50/50 custody = no one pays anything a UK thing? In the USA, one parent can still be liable to pay support (though not much) if it’s 50/50 and that parent makes more than the other parent. Source: My own custody battle as I won 50/50 but still have to pay child support.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 12:10 AM
3

This comment is so ridiculously underrated. This is exactly what all those morons who are doing the “sex strike“ need to read. Not that they really care about logic anyway but still…
/r/MensRights16/07/22 06:01 PM
6

Who said the woman is solely responsible? As you said it takes two to tango. That’s why birth control works for both men and women. Also on the responsibility front, a woman has so many options if she doesn’t wanna keep her child. Even with the abortion piece potentially off the table. A man has basically zero options if he wants to keep that kid and she doesn’t.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:00 AM
10

It’s a form of realistic masturbation which is safer than actual sex. It’s not a perfect replacement (but then neither is a vibrator). Why is that sad?
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:57 PM
2

It seems like these women are faced with the following choices: Get a hysterectomy and never have kids. Wait until they’re with (dare I say, married to?) the man they think is the best to father their children. Sounds like a win/win for the conservatives who voted for the Roe v. Wade overturn. . I mean that or they could use forms of contraceptives that are over 95% effective and if an abortion was absolutely required, travel to a state where its still allowed.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:48 PM
4

Yup. If your wife treats sex as a transaction… Sorry dude, you married a hooker.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:38 PM
2

^ This. Underrated comment. Any relationship (married or not) is a partnership, which means it requires both people to contribute and both people are equally important to each other. Any one who wants to try and upset this balance by acting too big for their britches should be tossed into a sack, and the sack tossed into a river, and the river hurled into space.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:20 PM
6

If women offer sex as the primary benefit in marriage, then men offer resources/money. So to the sex strike I would say to the wife: “You want to withhold an intimate act that feels good for both of us, due to a judicial decision in which I had literally no involvement? Okay then. I guess I’ll stop paying the mortgage and all the bills. Oh and while we’re on it, here’s a list of home maintenance items that need to be done; I’ll just wipe my ass with it. Just like withholding sex, my not doing th…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:27 PM
1

Takes two cold hearts. Mom couldn’t be contacted either. She’s worse for creating this horrible situation in the first place. It doesn’t condone the “dad’s” actions, but let’s not forget who the real cold-hearted person here is: mom.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:03 AM
3

Based on the article, the school couldn’t even reach the mother. For all we know, “dad” may have been doing better by leaving that child with caretakers vs in an empty home.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:01 AM
4

Certainly is a dirtbag thing to do. Know what’s worse? Having that kid under pretense that it’s your husband’s child and not being available when the kindergarten tries to contact you (mom) to come get your child. Both caregivers are doing wrong by this child, but let’s put the blame squarely where it belongs: The mother who lied and started this problem in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:59 AM
3

I think a lot of people who comment here about “the well-being of the child “and, “how could he do that to this boy? “, are missing the greater picture of the law in China. That being, the law is in place not so that a father could abandon a kid whenever he wants, but more so to let mothers know that infidelity will not be rewarded or supported by the state. A father who finds out that his child is not his, will not be made a wage slave and has every right to leave the parental responsibilities …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:28 AM
1

Where the hell did that pay gap argument come from?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:40 AM
1

Yeah. I can ask for a solid gold toilet. Doesn’t mean I’ll get it. Hyperbole aside, in a lot of states, a man asking for a fair, 50% (especially in family court) is akin to asking for a gilded commode.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 10:13 PM
1

You’re hilarious, old man. This went from what should’ve been a discussion to you thinking I’m hijacking your comment thread. Wow. And you have the audacity to tell me to get a hobby? Tell ya what. I’ll do a charity to the elderly and feeble minded individual that you are and leave you to your crickets in this thread. Likely the only company you’ll have. And to show you this is my act of good faith, I’ll block you after I post this. That way you can have whatever last word(s) you think are cleve…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:24 PM
1

You tell me. You’re still replying. Go on now. Shoo. Shoo. Get outside for some fresh air.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:55 PM
1

You too! Keep on flinging those insults. Just be sure to wash your hands when you’re done, girl.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:31 PM
1

Everything you’ve listed in having a two parent home does not require you to have a marriage contract. If you would bother to read my “wall of text “earlier, you would’ve seen where I mentioned that the family court is what protects children. Not a marriage. Keep it up with the insults by the way. That’s a great way to get your point across and change the minds of others. Besides, if I’m just too stupid to understand you then why are you still talking to me? I thought you said you were done with…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:43 AM
37

Probably one of the most underrated comments here. Have my upvote.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 10:25 PM
11

I mean, credit where it’s due. She actually gives out a warning that you probably should not smash this. 🤣
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/07/22 10:17 PM
1

And yet you’ve not responded to a single one of my retorts to your comments about marriage and how it protects the child. As far as debating goes, you’ve done none of it. All you’ve done is attempt to attack my ego and try to either debase me or shame me. Later.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 10:09 PM
3

I love that joke!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/22 09:03 PM
3

As usual, practically all the comments to this are worth perusing, but because I saved this post as a favorite, I wanted to highlight some of the best ones here (usernames added because credit where it's due): copehoperope: "A woman will always try to find flaws within you, unless you’re a savage, then she’ll try to find the goodness within you. Because, women seek that which isn’t there." Blackbarnabyjones: "Water seeks water at it's own level." thewhiskey_zulu: "But I can change him. Honey no …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/22 06:10 PM
5

You dodged a bullet from that gun (your ex), and then the manufacturers of said gun (parents) are begging you to “hold still this time.” I can’t stop laughing. I dub thee “Boris the Bullet Dodger”.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/22 04:55 PM
10

Then watch her reaction when, after telling her, and she asks: “Where can I find them?” “Sorry, they don’t wanna be involved with you (or any woman) on a long-term, committed basis.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/22 04:46 PM
1

I thought you guys were sharper than that. So that's not starting with an insult? Your hobby should be picking up a book. Also doesn't bother me if you don't wanna read it. You're free to lead your life as ignorant as you like. What matters to me is others WILL read it. Have a nice life.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:16 PM
1

For starters, opening up by slinging insults just shows your lack of intelligence. Although I have to say, you did a good job of that in your rebuttal. "... you don't see that sometimes pure ideology and acting on that pure ideology does more damage than good." Nice extremism there, acting like this is pure ideology. All I said was marriage is a fools game for men and has been for several decades. That's not ideology, that's just stone cold truth. That by the way, is what will cause the breakdow…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 03:58 PM
1

So, you think we’re stupid because we walk away from a broken institution rather than the rest of the world (who doesn’t seem to care about men) addressing the root of the problem: fixing the broken institution? Also, you think kids are ONLY born inside wedlock? I thought you were sharper than that.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 01:24 PM
2

On point 2, just don’t marry. Period. Full stop. It’s a fools game for men and has been for decades. Besides, if she truly loves you and you truly love her, then why do you need the government stepping into your relationship?
/r/MensRights03/07/22 12:58 AM
1

This is why marriage has been doomed for a long time. Let’s face it, when you break it down to the most basic desires between both genders it comes down to this: Men want: Exclusive sex from the woman. Women want: Exclusive resources from the man. In today’s day and age a woman has every right to withhold sex from you in a marriage. If you withhold money from her though she can get you for abuse under the Duluth model, divorce you, and get half your resources anyway. So yes I agree this is wonde…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:00 PM
1

It’s because they’re so used to men bending over backwards for them. One who doesn’t want them tickles their lizard brain. He’s not like all the other orbiters. He has mild interest at best and i could lose that in a heartbeat. Gotta pursue him!
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:51 PM
1

“Women are saying they won’t have sex with MEN, that doesn’t mean they won’t be having sex with each other.” Oh how I wish this exact scenario would occur. Save a lot of men heartache while the extremists literally and figuratively circle-bang each other right out of the gene pool.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:47 PM
76

^ This Anyone this toxic to punish someone for something they had nothing to do with, should be dropped like a bad habit.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:44 AM
30

The women who are participating in this sex strike are already frustrated. Clearly they don’t want to have sex with any of the men in their lives, so this is no effort for them. If anything this is a wake up call to the men in relationships with those women to break it off now and run like hell. Anyone who tries to punish you for something that you have nothing to do with: Run away. Run fast. Run far.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:42 AM
105

“Refusing to have sex with any men.” The verbiage here is key. Refusing means a guy asked them. Women who want it are absolutely having sex with men. If a woman wants to screw you, she will. She’ll go out of her way to make it happen. In fact she knows within the first 10 minutes of meeting you if sex is on the table. Your objective as a man is to not say/do something that will make her take it off the table.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:35 AM
4

Not at all what I said, but i hope you don’t dodge things for a living…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:41 AM
10

So in other words, women can opt out of being responsible but men can’t? Interesting. Sounds like the “fairer sex” isn’t ready to act like real adults, so men have to do it. Sounds awfully sexist when put that way, eh?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 04:16 PM
5

You punctuate your sentence with “lol” instead of a period, and you think I’m the dense person here? Go back to middle school and leave the adult conversation to adults.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 06:05 PM
132

“If women are still too sexualized, it’s because too many of your sisters are looking for a shortcut. Deal with them not me.” Meanwhile they’ll also yell that “sex work is real work”, but then cry “oppression” when the government wants to tax that real work.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 12:55 AM
-1

How is this discrimination? EDIT: oh I see, there’s multiple pictures. I only saw the first one.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 12:24 PM
10

“This isn’t necessarily the case if the father has an education.” Please cite the source for that remark. I would love to know what study has been done that shows a father having an education doesn’t impact his children in a positive way. This is one of the most sexist comments I think I’ve ever read on here.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 10:07 PM
5

Try: r/lostredditors or better yet, r/roastme This subreddit is about mens rights, not women’s rights to abortion. Your loss of a right to abortion neither benefits us nor pleases us for not having a right to a “paper abortion “. No one here thinks this either. Take your sour grapes elsewhere.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:44 AM
1

It’s almost as if… we men are expected to be the more responsible of the two sexes. GASP!!!
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:37 AM
3

Judging by the post: Trollstate
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:33 AM
8

“I don’t see how us being denied abortion helps any of it.” Commentor duhhhh’s very first statement in the reply says, “I think feminists should stop blaming men when a slight majority of pro lifers are women and women politicians are pushing abortion restriction legislation.“ No one here ever said that women being denied rights to abortion helps our cause for “paper abortion” in men’s rights. It seems to me like you’re barking up the wrong tree here. Go grind that ax over in the feminism subred…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:26 AM
7

I saved this post not because of the OP who I think is just looking for a fight, but because of all the valuable information you posted here. I agree with others that you should make this an original post in men’s rights and it should be pinned.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:20 AM
17

I’ve passed by many people (men and women) on a street in the evening (walking same direction) and never announced myself. Mainly because anyone who isn’t totally oblivious can hear footsteps coming up behind them. The woman is nuttier than squirrel shit for macing this guy without any sort of provocation. That’s it.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:25 PM
2

I remember that story and I think it’s hilarious. You know if the genders were flipped society wouldn’t have given half a damn.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:21 AM
3

This is what happens when you let inmates run the asylum…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 01:12 AM
1

Welp, guess we know where that time was spent. Seems you’re a terrible liar too. Don’t bother replying. Clearly you have nothing worthwhile to contribute and are only looking for a fight. I’d call you a troll, but trolls are clever.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:31 AM
1

The edit in my post where I challenged you for calling me childish (with a valid rebuttal) and then told you what to do with your inflammatory remark. EDIT: oh and by the way, said edit was only necessary because when I tried to reply to your post the first time, you had deleted it. I just so happen to see it on my Mobile Phone as a notification, so you didn’t quite get away with getting rid of it. Therefore I had no choice but to edit my original post just so I could reply.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 06:27 PM
1

Charge it all on this.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 04:56 AM
2

Those men brought the “A” game. Twice!
/r/MensRights21/04/22 04:50 AM
1

Uh huh. I hope part of that life is learning how to read
/r/MensRights21/04/22 04:31 AM
1

Oh look, you found your bravery bone. Decided to come back and post after all eh? See my edit in the post. The rope is still waiting for you.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:49 PM
1

What even is masculinity? Here you go (link is to Merriam-Webster). Masculinity: The quality or nature of the male sex : the quality, state, or degree of being masculine or manly. So no, it's a little more than just a pattern of actions. It's our nature. Hence why the OP is understandably agitated if he believes women are trying to tell men how to be masculine. No argument on assholes though. That has no gender preference.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 03:02 PM
2

It doesn't matter if it's a shit test, nor if you pass it or not. This pua/red pill thinking is so toxic as well. Genuinely curious here. Why do you say this sort of thinking is toxic? I mean any mindset when taken to the extreme can be toxic, but let's throw out extremism here. Why would recognizing (and therefore knowing how to respond to) shit tests be toxic? FYI: Shit tests are not just a "woman thing". Every human being does this as it's part of our nature to determine a pecking order. Hell…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 02:46 PM
2

It's sexist in the general theme that women can have their "women-only" spaces but men cannot. This isn't to say that guys (straight guys anyway) want a men's only night at a club, but anytime men actually want something to be "men only" it's forced open by the very same screeching hypocritical harpies we all know and hate.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:47 PM
2

I always knew in the back of my mind that she was one click away from hopping on some other dude's salami if and when she got bored or pissed off at me. Sure enough 5 months later that is exactly what happened. For all I knew, I probably was one of several guys she was dating simultaneously. Sorry to hear that. A not-so-old saying comes to mind: "She's never yours, it's just your turn."
/r/MensRights19/04/22 08:38 PM
1

Oooh now I get what you're saying. Essentially you think that by allowing a man to forego all financial obligations to a child he doesn't want, that would encourage him to practice unprotected sex with women right? EDIT: To the above paragraph. Thanks a million by the way for essentially lumping all us guys into dick-thinking morons who would never care about any sort of consequences we would impart on another human being (both the mother and the unborn) by acting so selfish and childish. I can'…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:13 PM
1

. If society expects men's participation, then the social contract has to be rewritten, and laws have to be changed. Truer words were never spoken. This is why MGTOW came to be. Men had enough and started walking away. The contract is bullshit and they want nothing to do with it. If people want to do away with the "eeevviilll MGTOW" then make the social contract meaningful to men once again.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:04 PM
1

Oof
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:23 PM
2

FWIW, anyone who punctuates a sentence with "lol" shouldn't be taken seriously in the first place. Clearly trolls who be trollin.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:47 PM
1

Fair, and I'm not a fan of women who think words are magic spells in an argument. Thank christ I'm not a dead beat dad either.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:35 AM
2

Love how you strawman the whole thing and yet again put all the onus on the man. News flash: Safe sex is BOTH people's responsibility. I'm not debating abortion here, I'm talking about offering EQUAL RIGHTS in a situation where its nearly impossible to do so. I actually offered a solution (EDIT: in this post, just not this thread), you just chose to ignore it while standing on your soapbox and attempting to shame me. What's your solution? Oh right, telling me this is an abortion issue. Perhaps y…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:33 AM
1

Whatever you say. After all it’s true because you say it is right?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:37 AM
1

Then I genuinely feel bad for you, because I feel like I’ve made that point several times along with links to back it up. Don’t know what else I can say to try and explain what I’ve said many many times over and over again. If you don’t get it well I guess that’s just too bad isn’t it?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:33 AM
1

Yep because he created that child he should have a say in that child not being aborted even if she wants to abort it right? But we already know what you’re gonna say to this so let’s not even bother
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:31 AM
1

Just keep ignoring what I’m saying it seems to be working for you
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:30 AM
1

Wow so apparently the man can’t back down and relinquish his responsibility but the woman can huh? Yeah I think we’re done here.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:30 AM
1

It seems we’re just going around in circles here because you keep ignoring what I’m saying. Yeah she raises that kid, and she gets a lot of support from the state and usually from the guy who helped make that kid whether he wants to be involved or not. Meanwhile she has complete and utter control and authority over what happens that child whether it’s born or not, and the guy is going to get yanked along for that ride whether he wanted that kid or he didn’t
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:29 AM
1

Your lack of insight is really starting to hurt my head. I’ve said it many times and I’ll say it once more: I’m saying we should not be funding the creation of single mothers. What I mean is in this type of situation where a kid is yet to be born but it won’t have both parents. Obviously this doesn’t account for people who’ve already had children and then they divorced leaving one parent the single parent. Come on now, use some common sense.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:28 AM
1

She created the child too, so shouldn’t she take responsibility? If she chooses to abort that child that man has absolutely no say whatsoever in her decision. So what’s his recourse? That’s where he should have the right to back down financially if he doesn’t want to have that kid. It’s the only way to make this even somewhat balanced or fair.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:27 AM
1

You nailed it. And why do you think those homes are impoverished? Because you need more than one parent to raise a kid. Therefore, we should not fund single mothers. If they can’t take care of the kid on their own they shouldn’t be having it. As you just said, it’s already hard enough even when they do have government assistance. That is no way for a child to live. Never mind the financial instability but also not having two loving parents in its life.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:25 AM
1

Who said that decision had to be on aborting the child or not? I’ve been talking about the guy persons financial involvement, because as has been said here many times there’s really no way to split up the pregnancy and burdens of such between a man and a woman.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:24 AM
1

Great, so you’ll pay for those welfare babies and you’re not a “selfish piece of shit“. Luckily for me, I am a unselfish not piece of shit because I think about the future of society and I think that we need to fix it. It’s statistically proven that more people in prison come from single-mother homes. https://fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics/ I’d rather not keep throwing money at a problem. I prefer to fix it. I guess that makes me a “forward thinking not piece of shit“. 😉
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:17 AM
1

When exactly did I say the road to abortion should be made more difficult?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:14 AM
1

Never said cut the program completely.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:14 AM
1

Just because you don’t know them, it doesn’t mean they aren’t out there. There were generations of “welfare babies “so unfortunately your expectations do not translate to the majority.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:07 AM
1

There’s a big difference in paying taxes to things that you may not participate in that are a benefit society, such as public schools. However it’s starkly different when your taxes pay to fund the downfall of society such as that of single motherhood in the situation described here. being a single parent no matter what gender you are it’s a very tough road to hoe, but we certainly should not be encouraging it. It’s one thing when two people have a kid together, but then they divorce eventually …
/r/MensRights15/04/22 01:05 AM
2

So in other words now you’re saying that effective contraception is 100% on the shoulders of the man? What’s wrong? Are you ladies not mature enough to take some responsibility of your own in that regard? What about when you have the pill, or the female condom, or the implant?
/r/MensRights15/04/22 12:57 AM
2

Great! Then you’re okay with guys foregoing any rights to the child’s life if they choose not to pay child support… AND That means you’re for the state no longer funding these types of bad decisions, because after all, it’s my money and therefore my taxes that foot the bill. Glad we’re on the same page. EDIT: Also to the gutless asswad who replied to me by calling me childish then deleted their comment. Allow me a rebuttal: My wanting equality and demanding a viable alternative in a situation wh…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 12:37 AM
4

What a delusional world you live in. If it’s their baby then he should have as much a decision in the outcome of the child as she does, but guess what? He doesn’t. Also you honestly think his opinion matters to the state after that child is born? 🤣 Did you know in some states the mother can put down the name of any guy she wants as the father? https://mtlawoffice.com/news/man-in-michigan-owes-child-support-for-child-who-isnt-his I reiterate: If she has a right to her body, then she can pay to ra…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 12:34 AM
2

It means that if she has the sole authority to decide the life (or lack thereof) for that kid, then she should also shoulder the full financial responsibility, assuming dad isn’t on board with the kid. Simply put: No child support from bio-dad. No government support. I.E.: No support from taxpayers like myself. You want it, you raise it.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 10:24 PM
3

Cool. When its her wallet alone, she can make decisions on how to fund that child that only she wants. Harsh, huh?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:52 PM
1

“My body, my choice.” Right? In that case: “My wallet, my choice.”
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:47 PM
2

Well, we as a society need to stop funding single motherhood. There’s two fronts: Stop welfare/government aid for more than 1 child. Give men the option to bow out of the child’s life completely. Otherwise you’ll just have more kids by people who didn’t want them, and what kind of future society will that be?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:10 PM
5

And if the father never wanted this child in the first place and wants nothing to do with the child? What then? So in other words (certain cases like rape not withstanding), it sounds like you want 100% authority but 0% responsibility for said authority over another person’s life? Meanwhile the father has 0% authority but at least 50% (in some cases 100%) responsibility in this situation. Here’s some simple math: No authority + responsibility = slavery . No responsibility + authority = tyranny
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:53 PM
3

Best way to fix this is the state stops paying welfare for more than one kid. Guarantee you if that happens along with giving men the choice to abdicate parental rights for not paying child support, you’ll see fewer “baby traps” and more abortions. Bottom Line: Stop Funding Single Motherhood
/r/MensRights14/04/22 04:46 PM
2

Per the article: “He alleged that Clenney did not suffer any injuries to support her claim of self-defense.” So… no signs of a struggle, and she stabbed him in the chest. Think about that for a minute. I would be very interested also to know if there are any slashes or knife injuries on that man’s arms or hands or anywhere else to show that he attempted to stop her from killing him. If not, that to me would be absolute proof that this was a unwarranted attack on him.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:29 PM
6

“He desperately wants children.” Will he be OK if they’re not his children?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/22 02:12 AM
1

What study? Where do you see a study reference in my comment? EDIT: Perhaps you meant to reply to the OP. Even though this thread is 2 years old, you can still do that.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 07:07 PM
27

I know two wrongs don’t make a right, but… “It takes two in bed to make it work, so make sure she brings her hot friend.”
/r/MensRights13/01/22 05:54 PM
3

Tis what tis. Frankly if egalitarianism could be the leading “movement” there would no longer be a need for gender-dividing groups like feminism (or MRA albeit to a lesser extent).
/r/MensRights22/10/21 01:34 PM
3

Welcome to what its like if one calls themselves an MRA. Sucks, don’t it? At least in your case, the hate label is only recent.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 01:21 PM
2

I’ll just leave this here for you…
/r/MensRights22/10/21 01:18 PM
1

Ah i see. The whole “to me” bit in your original comment makes it seem more like a personal opinion as opposed to an astute observation on the validity of judging a trait that is completely subjective.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 06:17 PM
1

It apparently added up to a winner and some rather sore losers, in this case. 😉
/r/MensRights20/10/21 04:38 PM
2

Beauty may be subjective down to the smallest details on an individual basis, but (as is the case in any contest) the majority rules on general standards, such as obesity for example.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 04:36 PM
3

Almost sounds like they want to be freed from all that agency and responsibility that first wave feminists fought so hard for when they won the vote.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 07:03 PM
6

Self-actualization. Simple as that, really.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/21 10:38 PM
1

Well thought out post, and a lot of good, sound, grounded advice.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/08/21 04:52 AM
9

“She’s just being a chick.” Her behavior is both childish and disrespectful. Excusing this kind of behavior just because of gender only gives people like her a pass to do it again. Take note of the sub you’re in.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/21 11:40 PM
5

“Also watch out that she doesn’t save your cum for later.” That’s why you flush the condom down the toilet. Or… if you believe in dishing out karma and you like taking risks: Bring two separate condoms with you, along with a packet of horse radish. Keep all three in your pants pocket. When sexy time is coming, excuse yourself to the bathroom to rinse out your mouth, brush your teeth, whatever, and be sure to take your clothes off in there (particularly your pants). Keep the wrapper for the condo…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/21 10:46 PM
2

While we’re asking for things, can someone get me a glass of dry water?
/r/MensRights21/06/21 09:07 PM
4

"To me and many women out here you are the Alpha Beta male. Our hero bailout. Our defender fallback. The ultimate male sucker. Much disrespect and honor shame to you." FTFY
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/04/21 12:31 PM
14

Holy fuck. I thought my divorce was rough...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/04/21 04:30 PM
45

Sincerely hope this gets passed. Feminists should be supporting this petition, right? I mean they are about equality of the sexes... 🤪
/r/MensRights05/04/21 04:26 PM
127

Seems the OP in that screen shot subscribes to the true definition of feminism: Feminism is about equality of the sexes, but only if that equality favors women. EDIT: Addendum to said definition: Bonus if said equality is achieved by dragging men’s standards down as opposed to lifting women’s standards up (even if the latter is at no cost to women).
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/21 04:24 PM
1

I like this... Feminist: “Stop mansplaining!” Me: “Stop cunt-plaining!” 😁
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:23 PM
2

The simple fact that you have agency and acknowledge your responsibility as an adult is really all there is to it. I swear most of the women who hide behind things like “mansplaining” are simply too afraid of what real equality means for both sexes.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:20 PM
15

Wow... Remember a time (pre clown world) when there were certain things that were basically implied grounds for divorce? You know, like your wife becoming a sex worker? It’s bad enough she didn’t consider her husband’s feelings on this (‘course who’s shocked about that, right?), but to do this to her kids too? I sincerely hope that father wins full custody. Lurking ladies, some free advice: No matter what “society” tells you, being a sex worker is one of the worst life decisions you can make. No…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 08:42 PM
2

Its clown world, so it’s hard for you to be wrong.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 04:25 PM
3

Yeah, “can” being the qualifying word here. This one cannot for all the reasons others have listed, but then I don’t think you care about those pesky facts, do ya? Might take time away from your precious axe-grinding.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/03/21 04:30 PM
111

“An old soul with a free spirit.” So... a run-down rental with so many one-night drivers, who’s speeding towards the wall but trying to pretend she’s still joyriding.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/03/21 11:20 PM
8

I like the analogy. Made a change to one myself recently after some people got butthurt over a post in an NSFW discord channel and I called them out for acting like a bunch of snowflakes. NSFW = Not Safe For Work NSFW = Not SnowFlake Worthy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/21 05:10 PM
20

So... women want to use us as emotional tampons and complain that we're not open about our own feelings, but the moment the tables are turned: "Eww! Gross! That's such a turn off! How dare you be honest and up front with me on a date! Don't change the game on me! Give me what I'm used to: Bullshit so I'll drop my panties and wait for you to text me the next day." ​ Christ...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/01/21 05:06 PM
1

Got a link to those stats we aren’t seeing?
/r/MensRights24/01/21 01:33 PM
7

Wait wait wait... A man in your workplace repeated a literal fact that is indeed sexist, but sexist toward men and a woman complained and now he is under investigation? Not only do I hope he walks away a millionaire, but I hope the woman who complained gets a full look at just how hypocritical she was to complain about her female privilege being called out.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 01:28 PM
45

“Are you a shark?” Sharks don’t chase a flabby hunk of whale shit.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/01/21 10:30 PM
3

This isn’t a war between men and women. With that kind of attitude, you’ve already lost because those in power will label you an extremist, misogynistic incel (or whatever bullshit label they’re slinging nowadays). You catch more flies with honey than vinegar, as the old saying goes
/r/MensRights03/01/21 04:40 AM
12

I’m sorry to tell you this, but the only way men’s rights will truly get traction is with a large number of women behind us. Men are seen as disposable in today’s society and as such are typically ignored in matters like these. However, women (esp protesting en masse) are certainly not ignored. Not to mention all the extremists who try to label us as incels or misogynists; a large female base would nullify that tactic. Simply put: Women (with their complacency and indifference to feminism extrem…
/r/MensRights02/01/21 10:39 PM
26

It’s all about power to feminists; equality has nothing to do with it, and if this isn’t proof enough, just watch some of the Karen Straughan videos. She spoke at MRA conferences and mentioned how her life was threatened by feminists for going.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 05:19 PM
4

Simply put, the MGTOW movement response is the effect/result of a gynocentric society gone overboard. When “equality” is only granted for the privileged party when it benefits them, it creates authority without agency. Meanwhile when equality is actively withheld from the underprivileged party when it would be detrimental to the privileged party, it creates agency without authority. Or, to dumb it down for the average idiot who can’t be bothered to think critically: Women (aka privileged party):…
/r/MGTOW229/12/20 06:47 PM
5

^ This. God forbid the extremists jackasses who pushed for this had instead tried to go to the Girl Scouts and say, "The Boy Scouts has an amazing program that our organization could benefit from, so lets try to implement it side-by-side and see if its well adopted by the majority of our members." But no, that would require too much work and wouldn't be playing the victim card.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 06:55 PM
3

I'm sure someone could. Trick is the person(s) who start it should have more skin in the game than just to prove a converse.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 06:53 PM
18

Kudos mate. This sub needs more quality posts like this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/20 06:01 PM
7

So.. instead of these idiot liberal women going to the Girl Scouts and saying: “Y’know, the Boy Scouts has an amazing program that stresses a physically harder experience. Could you implement a similar track alongside the current Girl Scout program to see how well our young women respond to it? If they like it enough, maybe we can make it mainstream!” Nah, its a helluva lot easier to just cry to daddy government and say: “They’re doing something better and we want in with minimal effort on our p…
/r/MensRights28/12/20 05:45 PM
5

Undoubtedly? Okay. I’ll give you this conjecture... Why? Because they were sued to do so in the first place. You’re gonna make the best of a crap situation, right? So yeah, now they’re forced to let girls in. May as well try to recruit them to: Show they’re going along with the results of the lawsuit and trying to please the feminist harpies who started that crap. And... Make some more money in the process (whether that’s to pay off other lawsuits or just because “mo money” is also conjecture on…
/r/MensRights28/12/20 05:34 PM
3

Your attempts to insult me not withstanding... Please explain to me how the Boy Scouts are destroying the Girl Scouts because of the lawsuits that they’re facing. Where exactly do you reference that from the article that was listed by the OP that’s what I’m talking about.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 05:23 PM
11

From where exactly did you pull that first sentence? Makes zero sense, particularly in relation to this post. Seems to me like you have a personal ax to grind. Sorry some jerk hurt you, but somehow i think you’re guilty of lumping in the whole organization based solely on your lousy experience. Not a good look.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 04:17 PM
7

Great. Then they can afford to keep at least one of those bathrooms as a men’s only space
/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:55 PM
2

Check my edit as to why it’s not.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:44 PM
9

I mean if you wanna call that level of childish thinking a “mentality“, then yes.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:37 PM
5

They are 50/50 female only/all gendered. EDIT: also, there is a good reason to have a men’s only and women’s only single occupancy toilet. Let’s be honest, most the time when people need to use a public restroom it’s just to do number one and not number two. Men are in and out a heck of a lot faster for that than women are. So if you make it both all gendered, you’re gonna have a much longer wait for everyone (during peak business hours).
/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:29 PM
23

Isn’t that day already technically here? I’m probably treading into a PC/SJW minefield topic, but numerous businesses have already turned their mens toilets into the “all-gender” toilets while leaving the women’s toilet alone.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:08 PM
15

Was going to reply to you, but NoMoreMisterMaybe summed it up quite well EDIT: Actually, I am going to borrow a line from NoMoreMisterMaybe. The women in these groups have a right, nay an obligation, to stand up and speak out against the feminist harpies who pushed for this crap. Men’s rights (believe it or not) depends on women helping out along with us. No one takes us seriously because men are considered disposable in today’s society. The only way we’re ever going to gain traction is if women…
/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:02 PM
10

Well thank goodness for that. Did not know this
/r/MensRights28/12/20 12:01 PM
280

Wait wait wait... So women argue for men to let girls into a boys only club, then get angry that their shitty decision cost them members from their own club and sue men who gave in to their bitching in the first place? If this isn’t one if the world’s biggest shit tests, I don’t know what is. Talk about letting the inmates run the asylum.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 04:25 AM
2

As far as I’m concerned, P&G will never see another dime from me until they make another commercial stating an apology for their previous attack on men. Crossed the last bit out because that’s how I felt back when it first came out, but at this point the damage is done and irreparable. Screw off, P&G.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 01:56 AM
1

The issue at hand is the utter hypocrisy. One can say the very same thing about women (as you pointed out), yet no one would dare make a commercial like this that pointed the blame finger at women; not only would the company go bankrupt but the CEO would get death threats and have to go into an identity protection program.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 01:47 AM
1

Yeah, I think this fits better on r/trashy
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/20 12:28 AM
3

Feminism is about equality. ... only when it suits them.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 04:31 PM
4

I have, still cut off EDIT: For what it’s worth, here’s a screencap of me “opening it up properly”. bad cropping yo
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:45 AM
3

Umm... the picture is cut off, so all we see is two pairs of women’s feet around a sign that says “with rapists.” r/croppingishard
/r/MensRights10/12/20 01:25 AM
21

nice men suckers FTFY
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/20 04:13 PM
1

Bachelor Tax
/r/MGTOW202/12/20 09:27 PM
3

Thank you for posting this. I’m constantly telling people that a core philosophy of MGTOW is seeking internal validation over external (e.g. society, women), and this is achieved through self-actualization.
/r/MGTOW202/12/20 03:40 PM
24

I’m sure it’s just the rambling of an extremist feminist lunatic, but I’m curious as to how she would propose a guy get the “consent” to hit on a woman. I mean, if you flat out ask for that, doesn’t that imply you’re already hitting on her? 😆
/r/MGTOW202/12/20 02:57 PM
3

Ditto. Got followed as well. Def a bot. Exact pic but diff name.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/20 02:10 PM
2

FIRST OF ALL IM NOT TRANSGENDER You get that a lot, doncha? Maybe change up those photos? ​ I'm 21 15 years ago... ​ I am a queen Queen-sized sure, and pushin' King. Someone, please pass that heifer a salad. ​ I am very blunt Like a hammerblow to the crotch, yes you are. I'm wilting already. ​ So I'm going to say what I want to say rather if you like it or not. And that would probably be something like, "No I'm not fat! Now pass me your nachos!" ​ Yes I'm young, but I'm very mature for my age. "…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/20 11:47 PM
2

I completely understand why she did. When I first looked at her pics, I thought... "Is that a dude tryin to come off as a lady?" I take it she gets that a lot...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/20 11:39 PM
2

I’ll say all of this is nice, but remember this (and this is more for the OP than you): Anything you agree upon prior to marriage (even in a prenup) can have the chance to be overturned if you get an asshat of a judge in divorce court. You can say that you and the wife have a mutual understanding and respect, but she will always have more power than you (until laws change) should you ever go your separate ways. Given all that, I would suggest (for the OP) is if she wants marriage, ask her to get…
/r/MGTOW201/12/20 10:15 PM
10

Ah, well that might be worth putting off the testicular harm. EDIT: Poor guy didn’t even get through half of them. Then again this tripe was sponsored by Buzzfeed so, guess I can’t say I blame him.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 12:26 AM
23

I’d watch, but I have a more important matter to attend to, like slamming my junk in a drawer. Jokes aside, I wouldn’t give the cuntknuckle group who posted the original video the clicks. No sense having YouTube pay them to spread hate.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 12:24 AM
1

Agreed. It should say: “Don’t trust/respect anyone until it is proven/earned.” Really that’s a good life rule anyway, MGTOW or not.
/r/MGTOW230/11/20 05:50 PM
2

I don't think it's possible for men to not be attracted to women and be manipulated by them and the sex and beauty that they offer. FTFY Jokes aside, (straight) men will always be attracted to women, but the manipulation can easily be overcome with the right amount of discipline.
/r/MGTOW230/11/20 05:48 PM
2

The point, I think, is don’t get involved with a woman who has kids already (or if you do, keep those kids well past arm’s reach). For the poor suckers who get duped into thinking they’re the daddy then find out they aren’t, I think it depends on the age if the child. Pretty sure most guys here would agree its one thing to walk out on a woman and cut all ties with a 2 year old you find out isn’t yours, but if that same child was say 6 years old, I imagine they’d have a much harder time leaving t…
/r/MGTOW230/11/20 05:43 PM
3

5 is by far one of the most significant for any man to be full and complete. Even before MGTOW existed in a named sense, Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs called this “Self-Actualization”.
/r/MGTOW230/11/20 05:29 PM
0

Thank you for approving this. I understand the importance of upholding the rules, as its a slippery slope, but these are definitely important rules to live by (and a little easier to retain/share in a picture format).. EDIT: With... some corrections now that I’m reading through the comments. Some of these definitely come off as woman-hating, and could stand to be changed (but at least we’re all discussing it).
/r/MGTOW230/11/20 05:27 PM
3

\^ This. Wish I could upvote this more. Don't label yourself on anything, because all it does is make you a target. Christmas on a crutch, just think about all the times you've been driving and seen someone with a political bumper sticker on their car. Forget about having one during *the present day* in the US, but even back 10 years ago. You're just asking for trouble if you go into the wrong neighborhood with that on your car.
/r/MGTOW229/11/20 10:04 PM
3

take your power back by purging yourself of the "need" for sex. Okay, so what does that get you (as a benefit) in your marital relationship then? It doesn't seem like a very healthy relationship if you have to literally use a type of coercion-by-withdrawal over your spouse. Besides, she can still demand things of you that she would expect (be it sex, money, etc.), and if you don't give those things, she can/will eventually divorce you and take you to the cleaners. ​ Demand it, as is your right a…
/r/MGTOW229/11/20 09:52 PM
4

To build on this point: While technology will always advance, the fact that this particular type of AI is gaining such fast traction and growth shows how much of a demand there is for it. Not to mention when feminists start crying about “rights” for these female robots (google it, this had been going on for years), it shows how frightened they truly are by this technology. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2018/04/samantha-s-suffering-should-sex-robots-have-rights https://www.mirror…
/r/MGTOW229/11/20 08:27 PM
3

Far too complex to boil it down to one issue, but i agree “good women” are rare. The real question is: “Why?” I’ll tell you one of the possibilities I think is behind it. Society has given women authority without an equal amount of responsibility, and women use it. (By the way, generalization so don’t run away with #HeSaysAWALT). The marriage debate is a great example. If a woman makes the “wrong choice”, everyone has her back. Society in general with “you go girl”, the government with all sorts…
/r/MGTOW229/11/20 08:12 PM
3

I really do admire your optimism. Of course there are good marriages. I think every man who gets married hopes his marriage will be a good one don’t you? You can talk about “better wife choosing skills“ all you want, but if you tell a man that if he screws up (and today the odds are about 50/50 he will make the wrong choice), he can pretty much have his entire life wrecked, most guys are going to opt out of that deal completely. The way to fix this problem is to make marriage an even deal once a…
/r/MGTOW229/11/20 07:55 PM
5

sigh Love how you took a generalization and made it hyperbolic. The point i was trying to make is a marriage does not mean you’re guaranteed to get laid. For Christ sake, a woman who is your wife can deny you sex, and if you don’t like it, good luck in divorce court. She has no obligation whatsoever to give you sex in exchange for that ring. Get the point now? Marriage ≠ sex
/r/MGTOW229/11/20 07:33 PM
3

You say that as though marriage = a sexual commitment. I’m trying not to laugh while I type this. Feminism today encourages women to be unfaithful (Have you seen these articles about “open marriages” or cucked husbands and how the authors try to convince the readers this is perfectly fine/normal?) If a man wants to get laid regularly, he pretty much has to always make himself in demand. Even a married man can’t let that falter, lest his wife start looking elsewhere.
/r/MGTOW229/11/20 07:27 PM
18

Methinks Solo413 is replying from under a bridge. They haven’t offered their own perspective or a counterpoint to back up their comments, and they seem to have several of these in this discussion. Point being, don’t expect much and don’t waste your time.
/r/MGTOW229/11/20 03:11 PM
17

Not only “stop saying it” but for every person who does say it, they should get the same treatment a man would get if he went on social media saying the gender converse.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 10:47 PM
3

Not married either eh? How do heterosexual couples form, then? All arranged marriages?
/r/MensRights27/11/20 06:44 PM
3

I wish I could upvote this more. It follows the principles of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs; MGTOW is the top tier: Self-Actualization
/r/MGTOW227/11/20 05:59 PM
19

Def won’t argue the double standards over there. In fact one of the commentors actually calls them out for it and references an example
/r/MensRights27/11/20 02:24 PM
44

It’s an interesting debate, but I don’t see how it has to do with men’s rights. Really all this shows is how quick the general populace of AITA are to give a pussypass, but if you scroll through the comments, there are also a lot of NTA remarks from people in the healthcare field who call out the doctor’s actions as inappropriate.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 01:41 PM
1

For my part i want the full context of those 16 examples, with court admissible evidence. Its easy to say he slapped her but leave out the part where she kept abusing him first. The Sun is not a reliable source.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 05:10 PM
3

^ This right here, which is why I think it’s hilarious that the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) has labeled MGTOW a hate group. From their own site, the splc defines a hate group as: an organization that – based on its official statements or principles, the statements of its leaders, or its activities – has beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics. We do not list individuals as hate groups, only organizations. MGTOW de…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 01:31 PM
1

Do they? When I say “freedom of speech/expression”, I mean the right Americans have as the first amendment in the Bill of Rights. My understanding is the UK has no such guarantee of rights for freedom of speech, because any act passed by parliament can overturn it, whereas any statute written that violates the constitution will not be enforced. US vs UK Freedom of Speech EDIT: Hit reply and wasn’t done. Yes, I read the verdict by the judge that the sun was not guilty, however that doesn’t change…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 01:15 PM
2

Yup, and just as freedom of speech (which by the way the UK doesn’t have) doesn’t allow a person to shout “fire” in a crowded building, it also doesn’t permit defamation of character. Unfortunately that doesn’t apply in the UK.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 05:15 AM
7

Simple, you don't make statements that already proclaim the supposed guilt of the person. Media outlets won't like it, but tough shit. Ruining a person's life should NEVER be an excuse to make money. If it were me, a law would be passed that media is NOT permitted to publish any stories proclaiming or suggesting a person's guilt/innocence until an actual verdict has been reached.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 01:52 AM
12

“Nah I’d still say it’s Amber’s fault.” No kidding. I wasn’t suggesting her third-class trip to the south pole for funsies. But don’t think The Sun doesn’t have a responsibility as well. They need to be made an example of (just like Amber) or they’ll continue to do this.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 10:34 PM
33

A claim of good evidence ≠ actual good evidence Put yourself in his shoes. If this happened to you, game over. Your life is ruined now, even after the truth comes out. Johnny isn’t gonna starve, but you will. Amber should be shipped off to Antarctica in a crate with no air holes as far as I’m concerned, but The Sun is not innocent here either.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 10:01 PM
60

Not like a lot of people (particularly here) have a subscription to The Sun in the first place, but I say boycott them. If there’s an article you want to link and its on their site, archive it instead so they don’t get the click traffic. Screw those muckraking assclowns.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 09:39 PM
2

Makes me think of comedian Bill Burr when he said: “There are no feminists in a house fire.”
/r/MensRights25/11/20 07:28 PM
1

In the same general context, women don’t get murdered/harassed solely for being women either, yet their rights get a heck of a lot more attention than men. In fact, they’re still considered as a minority group in some countries despite being ~50% of the population.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 04:32 PM
2

Men are considered “disposable” in mainstream society, and thus very few people actively care enough to take men’s rights seriously. Also, white men are supposedly responsible for all the evils of the world so... yeah... /s in case anyone needed it
/r/MensRights25/11/20 04:24 PM
2

Yeah, 8 seconds of your life you’ll never get back.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 04:29 AM
1

Username checks out.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 04:24 AM
2

Same. One is my daughter’s hair stylist. Lady’s a pro and has mentored several others who want to learn the trade (including men).
/r/MensRights25/11/20 02:20 AM
3

Feminists: “Feminism is about equality.” Pfffft. Hahahahaha! Then you go and ask that and what kind of treatment do you get? Second class citizen treatment.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 01:19 AM
1

I never said it was, but its less relevant here compared to mine. Consider the subreddit you’re on. If we were having this discussion on r/prolife, your point would be more relevant.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 11:05 PM
1

I really only came here to grind that axe though. To me it’s the most important axe to grind and it supersedes all other axes. Uhh... r/lostredditors Shame really. You're so focused on that one point, you're effectively ignoring (even outright shunning) a suggestion that would aid (in an indirect way) in reducing the number of suffering children. Honestly at this point, the way you've ignored everything else I've said to belabor your own point, it comes off as trolling, so I think its best to st…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 10:33 PM
1

Sorry-not-sorry that my solution won't satisfy your exact ax to grind about child neglect, but it does address a problem of unwanted children being born only for money. It also makes things more fair for the adults in this situation, and it helps curtail sinking even more tax dollars into welfare (as far as single parents are concerned). I've said this so many times in this thread its practically ad nauseam. Really not seeing a downside here. Meanwhile, you haven't presented anything to state my…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 09:46 PM
1

I never said it would totally get rid of shitty fathers. If there was a law that could eradicate crappy human behavior, and I was the genius to come up with it, I sure wouldn't peddle it on Reddit. However, it would REDUCE those instances (can't argue that), just as it would REDUCE women who are only interested in a welfare check or child support from a guy. I'm not concerned about supporting crappy men as much as I'm concerned about supporting good, decent men who get screwed over by crappy wom…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 08:44 PM
1

I think you misunderstood what I meant about sexual harassment. What I'm saying is your response for men is: "Forego any sort of pleasurable activity (sex) of ANY kind, if there's ANY sort of risk, even if that risk could be negated by a simple change of law." Example: People (women in my example) like to socialize, but there's a risk of sexual harassment if they go to a bar, or a club, or really anywhere, so by your logic the solution is: "Well just don't go there." That's ridiculous. Instead, …
/r/MensRights24/11/20 07:57 PM
1

So just don't do this at all and you'll be just fine? Really? Never mind a law change that could hold bad actors accountable, and level the share of responsibilities, just don't put yourself there at all. Basically go full-on tinfoil hat paranoid. Do you realize just how bad that sounds? What if that was suggested for women when it came to their complaints of sexual harassment? "Well just don't put yourself in that situation in the first place." Holy crap, the person to say that today would be s…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 07:15 PM
1

True, in that I as a man can’t expect a woman to carry a child that I want to keep but she doesn’t (for reasons you stated), which is why the converse should be permitted (to an extent). I.E.: If a law was passed where a person had the opportunity to give up all parental rights, you’d have fewer situations of “shitty men who pump, dump, and ghost”. It would also balance (as best as it can be) the agency I mentioned. As it stands right now, decent men have to be concerned about entrapment or “spe…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 04:48 PM
1

Yup, but if both parties take that risk, agency should be equally shared. Just a thought. 😉
/r/MensRights24/11/20 04:29 PM
3

The problem, or rather the inequality, is that women have all the power to end that child’s life or keep the child’s life if they so choose. Whereas the man has zero power in whether that child lives or dies. That’s the real crap.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 06:52 AM
3

Quickest way to end this is to put the burden of care solely on the person who wants the child (with almost zero government assistance) and give the other person full opportunity to opt out , but only once and by doing so they forfeit all parental rights. If they stay, they’re committed till the child is 18, no matter if the relationship turns sour. Also three strikes rule on abortions. If you require government assistance to abort the baby because you were too stupid to use birth control, third…
/r/MensRights24/11/20 04:54 AM
2

Seriously? That’s a thing now? A “cuddlist” because men (esp married men) are lacking affection in their lives? I just... wow. Times like these I wish the leaders of western countries would see things like this, then a guy like myself would shake them by the damn shoulders and say, “ Your country is dying a slow, sad, lonely death. For God sake do something about it!”
/r/MGTOW224/11/20 04:43 AM
2

Not trade in their shit, but would trade in the label of MGTOW. That is, once they got some (esp if it was likely to be somewhat consistent) they’d probably go straight back to the bluepill until they got burned again. This is directed at all the incel haters who piss on women just for being women. Similar to femcels and feminist fucktards who hate men for being men. It’s foolish to hate someone over something they cannot control and something that doesn’t make them a bad person either. Hating s…
/r/MGTOW224/11/20 02:20 AM
111

Finally! Some real equality in the dispensing of justice. She’s getting the same sentence a man would’ve received had he done the same thing. A true pussypass denied!
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 11:24 PM
7

Here’s hoping. If you do decide it’s worthwhile, keep us posted.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 06:16 PM
31

About time the white knights stayed on their horses.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/20 06:01 PM
4

Pfft. I mean look at the URL: feministikperspektiv Is anyone surprised a fetid pile of garbage fell off the back of that stank truck? Talk about biased.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:59 PM
23

This is called “equality of outcomes” to the extreme. Feminists have long argued that it was a “boy’s club” in the workplace in the past (which I don’t deny), but I guess “Two wrongs make a right” when it’s a women’s club. I bet if you filed a complaint with Equal Opportunity Employment, feminists (for all their shouting about Feminism means equality”) wouldn’t have your back here. For what it’s worth, the company will suffer in the long term by being so sexist in their hiring policies. Gender d…
/r/MensRights23/11/20 05:55 PM
2

Like this a lot. 1 = awakening / rage 2 = acceptance / healing 3 = internal validation / self-actualization
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 05:47 PM
1

So easy to just slap on a label. Not only does it require less brainpower than it does to even breathe, but it also dehumanizes you, which helps them justify cruel or even violent treatment of you.
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 05:43 PM
1

“Who are these guys, what are their studies I wonder.” raises my hand frantically Ooh teacher I know this one!!! Ummm underwater basket weaving? No wait, not useless enough.... ummmmm... Gender Studies, right? 😁
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 05:41 PM
1

Sure, if your single source for the entry is the subreddit r/mgtow. Of course, a real definition and explanation pulls its information from multiple verifiable sources (not the ramblings on Reddit).
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 05:25 PM
1

I’m guessing your interaction with them was awhile ago and you didn’t reply? Next time they contact me for a donation, I will.
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 05:22 PM
3

My reply to that would’ve been, “Well until you have better controls over the spread of misinformation, I cannot support you as that would be actively funding the propagation of hate and ignorance.” Would love to see their faces when they read that.
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 04:51 PM
1

You could also click on the sub name and then the “about” section. Sums it up pretty well there, thought if I was writing it I’d have added a line about striving to attain self-actualization.
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 04:40 PM
5

Egalitarian might be more your speed. Feminists (contrary to their branding) do not subscribe to true equality among the sexes.
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 04:33 PM
9

Most important thing to remember is any group of people (be it by movement, goal, or even gender) is gonna have the extremist fringe that will catch the public eye because the media eats that crap up. “I know from experience (because I’m a woman) we can be monsters.” Yeah women can be monsters, and so can men. Gender has nothing to do with it. “Some of you are nasty incels...” Won’t argue that incels have infiltrated the reddit groups, but make no mistake. Incel ≠ MGTOW. An incel would almost ce…
/r/MGTOW223/11/20 04:30 PM
7

I hope he files a restraining order against her. EDIT: Dang. Apparently not based on an updated post.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 02:45 PM
50

Ugh... Karens are gonna Karen. Really that about sums this one up. It’s not even: “We only cut men’s hair here because Reasons.” its, “I’ve never cut a woman’s hair before, so I’m refusing since I’ll bungle the job and make an unsatisfied customer.” Karen: “Well that’s not good enough a reason for me. REEEEEEE!” EDIT: Welp, Mom is still a Karen, but the guy actually wanted to keep his shop for men only. See below: ”The basis of the claim is that the barber shop refused to simply run the clippers…
/r/MensRights23/11/20 12:14 PM
3

Your post says, "How do I be a better feminist?" How exactly is that understanding our struggles? Also, most likely the reason your'e getting downvoted is because you're asking how to be a better feminist... and you're doing it here. Feminists (at least as far as the Reddit platform) despises MensRights. Heck, they think MRA is a hate group (just had an argument with an uneducated idiot about that earlier today). Another person who replied said it best, "Don't be one in the first place. Be an eg…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 02:53 PM
8

^ All this right here. Honestly this deserves more upvotes than it has. Own up and try to make it right.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 01:30 AM
8

Exactly, and it’s important to remember that while he may very well have been more than happy to have sex with his girlfriend, he definitely wasn’t happy about possibly impregnating her, and to me, that’s what makes this really messed up.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 01:28 AM
9

You can’t give consent when you’re black-out drunk. Period. Full stop. Mic drop. That’s what I took from this story. She thought it was consent but he was far too drunk to even remember the act (sans the ending), and the fact that he came in her when he would never do that normally just proves it further. Having said all that, I don’t think this kills their relationship, but keep the facts straight.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 01:26 AM
22

First question from me is if you were to flip this around, what would you want/expect, and what would you do?
/r/MensRights22/11/20 12:11 AM
5

No, it means you become wise by learning and observing. You don’t just get wise by random chance, luck, etc.
/r/MGTOW221/11/20 05:04 PM
3

You can be auto-banned before you even get a chance to post, depending on your subs. Like this sub and subscribe to it, you wont be permitted to post on the r / feminsm sub(which I won’t link here).
/r/MensRights20/11/20 05:06 AM
4

There’s a special place in hell for people like her...
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/20 04:43 AM
21

A two-year old? Frickin really? I’m betting daddy hit it and quit it.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/20 04:41 AM
1

Wrong sub. Try r/inceltears
/r/MGTOW220/11/20 04:36 AM
2

Sadly I’m one of those men (rape aspect). But yeah, we only get erections because we want it, not because it’s a biological reaction. EDIT: /s on that last line in case anyone needs me to say it.
/r/MGTOW219/11/20 09:04 PM
1

Keep MGTOW out of the title. Since it’s now considered a male supremacist hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (who are quick to throw stones in a glass house) your book might die before it even hits a shelf (virtual or physical).
/r/MGTOW219/11/20 05:38 PM
5

I think you’re in the wrong sub. If trolling is your game, try r/inceltears
/r/MGTOW219/11/20 05:24 PM
3

Because we “can’t be used”. If its sexual, we men are all just beasts and want it no matter what, from pretty much any female human. If it’s monetary, “well that’s just what we’re supposed to do as men is provide”. Quite sexist really.
/r/MGTOW219/11/20 05:18 PM
2

Tramp(led) is more like it. Or is there already a term to define a morbidly obese bitch who acts like a tramp?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/20 11:19 PM
2

Maybe she’s just projecting her own intellect. Probably that PhD in underwater basket weaving she got online.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/20 11:17 PM
7

“Keep your damn penis in your pants.” No problem with that. I’m not into screwing beached manatees.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/11/20 11:05 PM
1

Yup, but I wager she doesn’t mention that part to her hubby. 😁 She swings solo
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/11/20 08:32 PM
1

Translation: She Swings! And its possible the hubby knows about it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/11/20 08:28 PM
23

"We also need to do work as ourselves as communities to try and address the root causes of these problems, rather than just relying on technological solutions to deal with them." I’d love to see these jackasses attempt to address “the root cause”. By all means, tilt at that windmill, Don Quixote.
/r/MGTOW214/11/20 03:13 AM
4

Which pussy was denied the pass?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/20 01:35 AM
1

I don’t dispute that point; I agree this isn’t a pussypass denied. I was just explaining why she was arrested. She tried organizing a large public gathering (reason for it notwithstanding) which is (quite understandably) against the law.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/20 07:51 PM
22

Why not just end it? Because the lesson will never be learned if there’s no punishment. Embarrassment is a helluva punishment (especially for women who thrive on their social status). There was a time when adultery was just the worst kind of shameful act. If it went public it pretty much wrecked your life and had the whole town looking down on you. Quite the deterrent to adultery, doncha think? Take that away and you get what we have today: A generation of women who could care less about loyalty…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/20 02:58 PM
12

Redpill ≠ incel ideology (not even close) Blackpill ≠ incel ideology (slightly less close, but easily conflated by the lazy-minded media) Bluepill = mainstream belief that what you’ve been taught your whole life is true reality. (No, you’re not a sheep. You’re your own man just like practically everyone else.)
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/20 02:50 PM
-1

Its the fact she planned a large gathering of people during a pandemic. Also, I’m not Australian, but from the OP they don’t even have freedom of speech like I enjoy in the USA, so I seriously doubt they have a right to protest their government.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/20 02:30 PM
0

AKA: Organizing a large gathering during a pandemic. I don’t think she was arrested because of the protest itself. Check the OP.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/20 02:26 PM
1

if you go to a toxic waste dump and complain about the smell...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/11/20 11:01 PM
2

Hoo boy, where do I start unpacking this one? "My deepest fear for the times ahead is that the pendulum will swing too far in the opposite direction and men will withdraw even further form conversations and interactions with women in the workplace (or from even hiring women)." Times ahead? How about the present day? This is already very much a thing in many workplaces (including mine) and we friggin TELECOMMUTE NOW! In spite of this, we still keep conversations with our female and transgender em…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/20 01:13 AM
57

*“Ah, the joys of mortgaging your future...” Bart Simpson*
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/20 03:25 PM
3

I mean if a tax break and saving on your insurance is worth the risk of being reduced to a wage slave and every-other-weekend dad, then yeah sure. Honestly I’d rather pay Uncle Sam some extra dough than risk divorce/child custody hell. Take it from someone who’s been there, done that.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 07:14 PM
7

Ouch ouch!! My poor feefees! Ya done hurt them with that super clever snappy comeback. Best put that smartphone away before the teacher catches ya son
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 05:00 PM
4

Flip the genders here and I guarantee you so many people would be praising her for humiliating him in a similar fashion
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 04:41 PM
6

Flip the genders here and I guarantee you so many people would be praising her for humiliating him in a similar fashion. You included.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 04:36 PM
3

As opposed to doing it for...? Just revenge on level 1? Why not go for broke with your revenge level? Betrayal is the worst sin after all.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 04:30 PM
1

Cuckistan
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 04:27 PM
3

Excellent resource. Props for posting this
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 04:26 PM
2

Wow dude, thats some pretty incel thinking. I'm curious. What's the benefit to a man for getting married (in the eyes of the law)? I mean seriously? Not trolling you. I wan't to know. Aside from a tax break, what is the benefit he gets when you consider the huge risk he puts up for the likelihood of becoming a potential wage slave or weekend dad? By the way, things like "a partner for life to support him in hard times, old age, etc." doesn't count, because as far as I'm concerned, you don't need…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 03:56 PM
4

^ This right here. I tell as many young men this as possible. For god sake you don't need the government involved in your life anymore than it needs to be. That's especially the case for marriage. If she loves you and you love her, shouldn't that be enough? Why does she need a (mostly) one-sided "contract" to keep you bound to her?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 03:35 PM
2

Know your worth and be with someone who knows it too A man can dodge folly without backing into fear (aka peer/societal pressure). In this case, that pressure being "well you should get married because that's what you do". You should certainly know your worth and be with a woman who knows it too, but if she's truly that woman who values you, then she would also know be confident in herself (and you) that she doesn't need the government to hold a proverbial gun to your head to keep you in a commi…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 03:34 PM
23

Glad you posted this (and my condolences bro). People (guys in particular) need reinforcement on this trend in female behavior. “But... but my girl’s different. She wuves mee! She touch mah peepee!” Nope. No she isn’t. She’s never truly yours, it’s just your turn. So don’t think you can perma-lock that.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 01:52 PM
1

It’s not a call for violence. Sorry to break that to you bud. Big big difference between saying: “I hope (you) burn in hell.” VS “I (or others) should drag (you) to hell.” EDIT: Also, a call for violence is known as “incitement”. I’m not breaking the law here. My account would be banned so fast if that were the case
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 01:33 PM
2

How was my comment “calling for violence”? I never suggested anyone drag the two of them kicking and screaming to hell. I simply hope karma puts them there all on its own.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 01:10 PM
2994

Meanwhile the one Karen there won’t stop running her mouth on how “that’s terrible” calling a betrayer out and humiliating her. Clearly she has betrayed someone herself. I hope they both burn in hell.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 03:56 AM
4

Pffft.. hahahahahaha!!!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/20 08:50 PM
11

I mean, Halloween is just around the corner... EDIT: couldn’t help myself...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/10/20 04:53 PM
3

Well said. The red pill is a tough one to swallow, but once you do, there’s no turning back. Also I agree that if change doesn’t come from us (positive change), it won’t come at all. Make no mistake, things will change, just not for the better of western society.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 07:31 PM
3

Look at this post. The individual in question had 3,000 matches in 2 days and said 99% were not up to her standards. “There must be better men out there!” 😂 Honestly i think you’re taking this too personally. Yeah there’s a grain of truth to it, but if this woman doesn’t represent you, then why do you care?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/20 04:05 PM
2

I think ClockworkOrange nailed it with his reply, but I'll add by saying the way to win is to have reasonable expectations: That is, if you want to be a doctor, great. However, understand that will take a certain amount of your time (and youthful time at that), which will likely disqualify you from a certain pool of men that you may very well be interested in dating. It's not "there's no way to win" its more, "you can't get first place in every single category". You're gonna have to make some co…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/20 03:47 PM
8

Thing is because I’d only give myself a 5 or 6 it means I am effectively a 2 or 3 to women on tinder due to how it is warped. And I have no interest in 1-3s I guess it seems hypocritical as red pill content is quick to tell women “the people who match and message you for relationships you can actually attract” and I am not taking that message to heart myself ... ​ I speculate you aren't taking it to heart because you hate the fact that you already know the answer (I'm quoting it from your commen…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/20 02:48 PM
3

I have to say, I have seen the whole “widowed“ excuse used around here a lot. And I have to draw the line here. True, we don’t know if she’s widowed or not, and if she is, that is not her fault and she could very well be a victim of circumstances. Having said all that, the sad fact is even if she is, no man wants to marry a woman with three children, widow or not. Sometimes life just deals us a bad hand, and we have to know when to tap out and go play something else.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/20 11:24 AM
7

At first glance, it looked like the remains of some blood/vomit residue from too much drinking the night before.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/08/20 08:43 PM
113

“Knows what he’s looking for on good ole Tinder...” Yeah, a pump n dump. Seriously who the hell thinks Tinder is a matching service for anything long term? That’s like trying to wash and re-use a paper towel. Also on a side note, that “goatee-lookin” tattoo makes me cringe.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/08/20 03:34 PM
3

Thanks! 😁
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/20 03:05 PM
11

r/lostredditors
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/20 03:30 AM
2

True. She could just be bat-shit crazy and did this for no reason other than wanting a space for her car. But occam’s razor would suggest differently.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/20 01:22 PM
1

Femcel
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 12:20 AM
2

Mkay then
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 12:19 AM
1

r/femcel
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/20 12:16 AM
4

My reply to the “mansplaining” woman. Stop “womanwhining” and come back when you want real, actual help.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 07:44 PM
2

Feminism is allied with communism in that feminists believe in taking from those who make more (as long as it’s men) and redistribute it to those who make less (as long as it’s women).
/r/MensRights07/06/20 07:40 PM
5

This is just an example of why there are different weight classes in boxing (and gender classes). An argument with physics never ends well. Still, no PPD here. Pretty sure she knew what she was getting into when she mentioned tryin to make another viral video. Not to mention she was the only one wearing protective head gear.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/20 12:58 PM
1

That was considered an attack? Yeah, an attack on the feminist lie maybe... Christ this whole site (sans small pockets of course) is so frickin slanted, I’m surprised it doesn’t fall off the proverbial left side of the internet.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 11:38 PM
23

“Forced to sign a contract” is easier said by the word “duress”, which makes it null and void. Yup, whoever made that picture title needs to get their head out of their ass (unless of course, there’s actual proof she signed under duress).
/r/MensRights28/05/20 01:48 PM
80

This has to be a troll account. The only guys I can see swiping right on this chick are masochists. Even your average Captain Save-A-Hoe would turn tail and run from this dumpster fire.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/05/20 01:45 PM
12

Whatever you say. I’m sure it’ll blend in with the other incel stuff in your browser history, like pornhub. 🙃
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/20 10:54 AM
0

Frankly I don’t think the OP even fits the sub because in no way did the woman use the power if the va-jayjay to avoid a punishment (and then still receive said punishment regardless). Only way I think it squeaks by is due to the comments on the AITA post (per the OP here) where they downvoted people who said the guy was in the right to sue her. In that respect, it’s something of a pussypass... but even then, it’s not being denied.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 09:47 PM
5

I dunno. The bit about job interviews I thought was good advice.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 09:44 PM
4

Try reading the whole thing before you pass judgement.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 08:22 PM
9

You don’t have to like the way the author presents the information, but to deny that this sort of behavior doesn’t happen as a “pecking order” between men(and women) is just obtuse. Shit testing goes well beyond any “incel” label. The author even explains it’s use in job interviews. You might want to actually give the article a shot and read it all before you pass a one-sentence judgement on a whole sub that will at best, have others look on you with disdain, and at worst, get you reported (not …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 08:13 PM
8

Do explain. Unless you’re just a troll.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 07:29 PM
2

Better to be the learnding Ralph Wiggum than this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 05:14 PM
8

NP (no problem). PUA (pick-up artist). Not necessarily a reddit term either. Been hearing that one for 20 years.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 05:10 PM
16

Also to be fair: red pill philosophy != incel Actually I decided to reread the whole primer, and frankly I think it’s more geared to a PUA than an incel type. It also talks about instances and examples that go well beyond just women on how shit tests will impact one’s life. (In case you didn’t know “!=“ means “not equal to”).
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 05:06 PM
7

When I said “some” I was being sarcastic. 😉 None the less you got my point. There’s nuggets of knowledge everywhere, sometimes buried underneath crap.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 04:32 PM
31

Take the information and gleam what’s useful to you. Some would say the Bible is kinda religious, but there’s a lot of good lessons in there too (if you’re willing to search for them).
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 04:25 PM
75

That was a nuclear level shit test she tried on him, and he passed. Too bad for her it blew up in her face. EDIT: For those unfamiliar with shit tests, here’s a good primer. The entire site is an excellent source of knowledge, by the way.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 03:27 PM
6

It’s 2020, so men and women, boys and girls, are equal. That means equality in all matters. Give anyone who attempts to touch you inappropriately a fair warning to stop. If they try again, take action. As tempting as it may be to deck someone who grabs at you, don’t. Instead, file a complaint. If the teacher brushes it off, go to the principal. If they try to brush it off, threaten legal action for sexual harassment. Insist to call your parents because this has made you distraught. Let these cun…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 03:09 PM
9

And this is why when I see that donation banner, I wish I could donate my opinion in lieu of cash, and suggest where they shove it.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 02:58 AM
20

The irony in this is just delicious. When women sell sex to men, it’s completely straightforward and all business. But if a man wants to get “regular sex” its any guess if he will or not. Meanwhile these women are getting that kind of prostitution in reverse, where they’re strung along then find out they can’t get laid unless they pay more. Warms my black, dead heart.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 02:53 AM
3

Then we should ban mother’s day for the same reason since its offensive same sex parents and to single fathers. Smash the matriarchy. What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the birdbrained femnazi.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 02:43 AM
6

Cool. We respect women here as well and remember men have feelings too (even though we’re always told to keep them to ourselves since general society doesn’t care about men’s mental health.) So on that note, try not to post passive-aggressive content. Cheers!
/r/MensRights26/05/20 01:28 PM
3

Sadly, I wager there are blue-pilled idiots who take this as “a challenge” to prove they’re so much better and think that surely she will fall head over heels in love with them once they exceed her expectations. Trouble is, you can’t win the game when even the judge doesn’t fully understand the rules she’s laid out.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/05/20 01:48 PM
4

A writing assignment as a first date qualifier? So, are you just some washed up remedial grade-school english teacher or just desperate to have some semblance of a collection of ass-kissing “love-letters”?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/05/20 05:05 AM
13

Seems like the MGTOW choice is the best choice here. Walk away from her (and her ilk) entirely.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/05/20 06:24 PM
2

It's a big thing because of the level of entitlement from a lot of women out there. Personally I think it's just bad parenting (I mean you could make the same argument for lazy men who don't lift the seat before they pee and get piss on the seat). However, you yourself demonstrate you're an adult. You have agency and responsibility; you look before you sit which is why this isn't a big deal to you personally. Sadly I think a lot of women were raised with this entitlement mentality that this kind…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 02:30 PM
3

Dunno why you were downvoted. Good on you for at least trying to instill some cleanly habits.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 01:46 PM
1

The only "legit reason" (if you can even call it that) is if you admit you can't be a responsible adult and look before you sit. That or admit you're just a lazy, entitled person who can't be bothered to change the position of a toilet seat and you demand your partner do it for you.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 01:31 PM
3

Yup, splash effect or bad aim. Funny thing is, lots of people on this very thread have said,"Oh just sit down to pee, its easier and much more sanitary." Clearly they've never seen a neglected women's bathroom. The underside of those toilet seats is the stuff nightmares are made of. Bottom line really is this: Men: If you pee standing up, you're going to get urine on something, so wipe it down. Both: When you flush, close the lid first so you don't spay fecal bacteria in the air. Women: If you b…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 12:39 PM
2

Nope, its not "malicious compliance". It's making sure everyone is safe. You don't want anyone getting a fecal bacteria infection, and besides that, you want to make sure small children (or big children in this case) don't fall in by mistake since they lack the mental forethought to look before they sit down.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 12:32 PM
2

See dems fightin squares. I'd do the same thing with paper towels if that's how it's gonna be. Just leave that last, underdeveloped half a sheet glued to the roll left on the paper towel roll in the kitchen.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 12:30 PM
2

Oh dear God, THIS! My daughter started doing this crap and I put a stop to it right quick. I swear it's because when they were little girls no one ever taught em right. Heaven help them on how to change a roll of TP.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 12:03 PM
1

Exactly. It's all about being a friggin adult and acting responsibly. If you're a man, it's your responsibility to lift the seat up before pissing so you don't pee all over the seat. If it was already up, great. As a woman, it's your responsibility to look before you sit. If it was already down, great. Honestly I don't see what's so hard about this.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 11:50 AM
1

I use it in this capacity.)
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 04:37 AM
3

That would require agency and responsibility. Women who complain about the toilet seat position tend to be lacking in both.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 03:08 AM
93

“But itd be my fault for not checking” See at least you have agency and admit you’re an adult who can take responsibility for something as simple as.. oh I dunno... looking before you sit down I can’t get over the women who throw a bitch fit over the toilet seat debacle because god forbid they look down first.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/20 03:01 AM
2

They only think it’s horrible because they hate the truth behind it. Guys don’t want to wife up a whore. Meanwhile, women go for the top 20% of men and they will share a top tier man with other women (albeit begrudgingly).
/r/MensRights21/05/20 02:53 AM
0

Very probable, but my point remains valid. Don’t even be a white knight for yourself in a situation like that. Road rage puts people into a psychotic state of mind.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/20 01:30 PM
39

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. We don’t know the context of the video, and the driver is pretty much guaranteed to be going to jail for their actions, but... Let this be a lesson to all the white knights out there. Do you really wanna get your sorry ass wrapped around a light post over some dumb bitch? EDIT: Figured I’d add this here since a couple people have mentioned it may not have been the guy white-knighting, but just angry that he was nearly run down. Very probable, but my point re…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/20 05:08 AM
3

In family court it rarely is. There’s case law that’s made this sick fact true
/r/MensRights19/05/20 11:53 PM
3

That 13 year old better hope his rapist isn’t pregnant, otherwise (depending on the state) he may find himself (or even his parents) owing that POS back-child support.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 11:08 PM
2

I totally agree on calling it off, or at least postponing it (but lets face facts, if he does that, its over anyway).
/r/MensRights18/05/20 08:34 PM
4

U/meirjaminlol summed it up pretty well, actually. EDIT: Okay, that was from my phone and really doesn't do this justice (though I stand by the fact that the other guy said a lot of things I agree with). First and foremost, you've stated you're clinically depressed and have an anxiety disorder. My assumption (so correct me if I'm wrong) is these will require a life-long treatment process (no cure). Is your fiance ready to accept that with you; to go down this road with you, which will be bumpy a…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 08:23 PM
5

Yup, definitely struck a nerve. Twice. Wow. You’re so far off base. It’s similar to how some people make the mistake of calling a tomato a type of vegetable when in fact it’s a type of fruit, but it’s as though you’re calling it a type of suspension bridge.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 01:55 PM
1

Fair enough. If everyone could apply your logic, we wouldn't have a need for this subreddit. :)
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 11:19 AM
6

Struck a nerve, eh? As I said in my previous post, "Sorry, couldn't help myself." Then I pointed out the fact that anyone who calls themselves by that title isn't someone of royal standing. The point isn't her weight, its the audacity (which is what the OP is essentially addressing). But I do love your shaming tactics, tried and true as they aren't: "Get a grip. This woman did nothing to you."
/r/MensRights17/05/20 11:18 AM
1

Ah I see you edited this from "probably", so I'll reply. Now there's a thought for you. You said, "If a man is way smaller than me and in a state of mind that is not himself." So if he was in a state of mind that was himself, would it be okay? The reason I'm doing this is to compare where the line is drawn between men and women. Using the pretext of it being not okay to hit a woman because she's a woman is sexist. When you throw in the bit about it being like hitting a child, you're implying tha…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:51 AM
1

Username is appropriate
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:22 AM
1

Fair enough. Under those principles, I would expect you to not hit a man either if you are not in real danger. Also, the comparison of not hitting a child seems to be used a lot when compared to not hitting a woman (in an argument like this). I’m not saying it’s an invalid point, but I find it amusing when women are compared to children because you know they’d otherwise lose their shit if you did that in any other capacity.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 10:18 AM
1

The reason “reddit cheers” in a lot of those videos is because the majority of women in western society today enjoy authority without agency, whereas men do not get that privilege but are expected to treat women as equals. So when women act the fool because they think they can get away with it, and a guy knocks her out (even if that’s going overboard) it’s seen as a small sense of balance being restored. I imagine that reasoning seems vapid and senseless, but it’s an explanation.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 09:26 AM
2

So by this logic, all women are not threatening to men when they’re in a physically violent state, on the grounds that they’re “significantly weaker.”?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 09:17 AM
1

“Oh so does that mean I can hit you?” “How can I use these arguments to justify beating women?” Where did you get that, exactly? The point being made here is that if a woman starts attacking a man, she does not get out of any sort if potential retaliation just because she’s female. You state the reasoning behind this is because women are generally weaker than men. So by that logic there should be a similar law against any man who’s over 280lbs of solid muscle vs any average guy. The bottom line …
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 09:14 AM
1

If a 5kg guy hits an 80kg guy under the same circumstances, is it okay for the 80kg guy to hit the 5kg guy back as hard as he can? More to the point, do you think an 80kg guy will be thinking about “holding back” if the 5kg guy hits him first with the intent to harm?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 09:05 AM
1

If you can’t comment, I can in your stead. Yes, generally speaking, boys are born with inherently more muscle mass and bone density than girls, which becomes evident as they mature into adulthood. So (outliers notwithstanding) men will be stronger than women with the same upbringing (same diet, same exercise, etc.). Having said all of that, none of it matters here. This is 2020 and supposedly we’re all equal, so ain’t nobody above an ass-whooping from anybody else, no matter the gender differenc…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 09:00 AM
2

Picking one narrative and sticking to it would make logical sense and require the use of a rational thought process. Haven’t you heard that logic and rational thought process are tools of the patriarchy?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 08:48 AM
1

Yeah it’s not right, but a lot of judges (even if they aren’t biased) are burned out from so many cases and rarely care about the principle of a situation. They just see the law broken and punish each party accordingly. Party A physically attacked Party B first (once). Result: Punish Party A. Party B retaliated physically against Party A for aforementioned actions. Result: Punish Party B.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 11:35 PM
18

“King-sized” maybe... Sorry, couldn’t help myself. Frankly, anyone who feels the need to call themselves a king or queen is most certainly not of actual royal standing.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 11:05 PM
7

I think she says “continuous” because of the law (I’m not her so I wouldn’t know). If anyone strikes you only once then stops their assault (esp if they suddenly yield or retreat), its not self defense to knock their ass out. Not gonna lie, I’d likely still beat someone’s ass even for a single hit, but the judge won’t care about the “heat of the moment”.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 10:55 PM
7

Oddly enough, I don’t think they’re worth the same. That’s too broad of a statement, because worth (typically) must be proven in a modern society. Real equality means equal opportunity to prove said worth.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 10:48 PM
2

No actual physical evidence whatsoever, at least from what I understand in this article. It’s all based on her memory and “her recollection was very poor”. Maybe I don’t fully understand the law, but I thought you needed more than just your own word against someone else to file criminal charges. Where’s the police report? Or other witnesses who could verify statements made by her? Don’t get me wrong. Glad the guy was acquitted, but to me (again based on what I know from the article) this shouldn…
/r/MensRights16/05/20 10:20 PM
8

“I have no desire to deny any man’s reality. Denying women’s much greater suffering as victims of domestic and/or sexual violence is a political act. The differences between men and women’s use of violence and experiences of victimization do not need to be denied or minimized for all victims to be deserving of safety and support. It is quite possible to believe that no woman, child, or man deserves to be a victim of sexual or domestic violence (or indeed of any other type of violence) whist main…
/r/MensRights16/05/20 10:11 PM
5

Just friends even? Not a committed girlfriend or “friends with benefits” but a plain ass friend? Just imagine a straight man acting this way towards you. Or a straight woman acting this way to another straight woman. Boggles the mind... EDIT: To be clear, not saying its okay if she’s putting out as a friend with benefits or as a girlfriend to act like this, but the audacity as a simple friend with this entitlement is what gets me.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 09:43 PM
35

“...we should never have a situation where a mom with her child ends up under arrest for that kind of offense," de Blasio said. "It's just not right." “ Yup, it’s also not right that trailer trash like her wasn’t made sterile before reproducing (‘cause the kid sure didn’t ask for a shitbag mother), but life isn’t fair.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 09:40 PM
1

“You don’t have to tear down men’s rights to lift up women’s rights.” There’s the converse of your statement. I would love for you to post that in the feminism subreddit and let us all know how fast you are banned (before all the slanderous, hateful remarks are slung at you like turds from the monkeys over there). Meanwhile over here, no one has called you hateful names, accused you of misandry, or outright banned you just for posting your controversial opinion. Instead, you’ve been addressed wi…
/r/MensRights16/05/20 09:29 PM
25

Probably used a glory hole.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 08:17 PM
213

Glad to see it was (presumably) another woman who said that’s an unfair expectation of a guy to not hit when being attacked. We see it a lot here from men (hence the sub), but it’s good to also see women denying that pussypass too.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 08:14 PM
2

Too bad your mom mistook her uterine fibroid for a human being and carried it to term.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 12:30 AM
2

Ah got ya. You should add an edit to clarify.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/20 04:42 PM
6

If the alternative to being single is her, then yes I’ll enjoy being single. Gladly and enthusiastically.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/05/20 03:52 PM
6

I thought this was just a funny sub making fun of all the dumbass "i want a REAL man" and "I deserve a king for me and my 8 kids" kind of posts. But it's definitely not. You're kidding, right? Did you not see the complete 180 this chick did in her dating profile on multiple occasions? Right off the bat, she says "No Scrubs" and "I have high standards." Why would anyone need to say that? Are we to assume she has low standards and is okay with scrubs? Y'know why she says this? Projection. Look at …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/20 02:29 AM
3

In the words of the great and wise Terrence Popp: “She different. She wuves me!”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/05/20 09:43 PM
3

I’m still calling her a loser.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/05/20 07:57 PM
3

Yup, sounds like she went full retard.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 11:37 PM
2

Wow. That’s... really sad actually. Hashtag ReadingIsHard!Wah!
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 10:37 PM
2

Aaaand there goes the personal growth. Also proving that you’re a child. Have a good one.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 10:07 PM
2

Bravo! You presented your opinion on why you disagree with me and you did it without slinging insults! I think you've had some personal growth today. You may not think she should've been fired, however the company who employed her said it creates a sexual harassment issue. If you care to look, someone else posted a link to the entire article in this thread, and other commentors have explained with examples why she was fired for doing this. Hate to break this to you, but most companies would do t…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 09:52 PM
2

part in history class where women were allowed to show their ankles It only took you 5 tries, but you finally made a modicum to the discussion. So you think my problem is with this girl showing too much skin? Allow me to correct you. I don't have any problem at all with her being a slut; to each their own. The problem I have, is her whining to the press that she was (shocker) fired from her day job for doing this when it was found out. The fact that she's surprised this happened to her, is why I…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 09:20 PM
4

Now I’m salty? Stealing my line because you can’t even be original with your retort? Don’t drop out of school, kid. It may be your only chance in life.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 07:40 PM
4

So you didn’t read the comment all the way to the end (btw, the tl;dr part is a direct quote from the girl), and that makes me the (insert whatever dumb shit you’re slinging here)? Keep at it with the insults; that’s a real winning strategy isn’t it?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 05:52 PM
4

Uh huh. You know me so well apparently, that your response to my post is to “get laid.” Like that would make me see this story differently if there wasn’t any baby batter in my balls before I read it? You can’t even compose a valid counter argument to my comment as to why you think I’m incorrect. Can’t even try to explain your point of view. Nope, its just “you need pussy bro.” Right. I think we’re done here. I’ll be ignoring your chat request too. Have a nice, salty life.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 05:41 PM
3

Aww you salty bro?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 05:30 PM
8

This is a true example of the pussypass being denied. Love this direct quote from the Can’t Understand Normal Thinking herself: “I had a coworker come up to me and… he was telling me how the salesmen were all huddled up in a group, and that he had come up to the group and they were on an OnlyFans page. And he said that he didn’t know it was me until they passed by a picture of my face and he said: ‘I’ve seen a lot of you.’ I was like: ‘That’s fucking great, thanks. Showing it to fucking everybod…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/20 05:26 PM
-1

Women and Leftist practically go hand-in-hand. Women want protection and provision. The majority of them are more than happy to have bigger government fulfill those wants. Leftists (generally speaking) want bigger government. To quote Jeff Foxworthy, “If you mix stagnant pond water and raw sewage, you ain’t gettin Evian.”
/r/MensRights25/04/20 06:32 PM
24

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I mean, you were taking a “rape quiz”. That’s like taking a “hate crime quiz.” Did you really think whoever wrote that garbage pile of a time-waster was even the least bit concerned about making it unbiased? Hopefully you got a laugh out of it, if nothing else.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 06:17 PM
1

It’s still there
/r/MensRights24/04/20 02:14 AM
2

She’s wrong? How so? You mean that women are biologically in a better position to be leaders simply because they’re women? Of course the genders have roles; thats been the case in biology and nature for literally thousands of years, but not in this particular situation.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:59 AM
3

Never said you did say any of that. I was merely pointing out the theme of the OP; a person in the media who is going against the mass media’s agenda of trying to label female as being superior for the sake of being female. Nice rant by the way, though very defensive. Especially the bit about knee jerk reactions. Your entire response is exactly that. You sure you aren’t the one who needs a little fresh air? Slinging curse words and insults just shows others you’re not in a position to have a rat…
/r/MensRights21/04/20 10:54 AM
1

You think you can elaborate how this post has anything to do with hate? Who is it hating on? Please do explain to this “dumb fuck”.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/04/20 03:41 AM
1

Oh geez. I mean if that kind of ignorance bothers you, god help you if you tried to buy some TP in the last few weeks. 😉 Don’t sweat the ignorance of the masses. Its like pissing in the ocean and being mad when a sea breeze blows your own urine back on your legs. Try to enlighten and uplift people one at a time. If everyone here on this sub did that, we could create true equality.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 11:29 PM
3

We don’t condone violence here (we don’t need to give Reddit another reason to try and quarantine us do we?), but I think the gist here is to stand up for yourself. Only the weak can be pushed around or bullied. Now exactly how you decide to stand up for yourself is at your discretion of the situation.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 11:25 PM
2

Probably because they think Feminism stands for true equality. Let’s face it, that’s a lie feminists have been peddling for 100 years. You’re bound to have some suckers out there who still believe it, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/20 11:19 PM
37

That’s an excellent point. And God forbid you take the neutral route and say that the reason a lot of women don’t go into STEM is because they simply don’t have interest in it, which could be due to the way their brains are wired compared to men. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013760/ This study suggests that, interestingly, there actually isn’t a major difference between male and female brains, however, to quote the the research: “Close-to-zero differences were found for mathemat…
/r/MensRights20/04/20 11:12 PM
6

Perhaps, but that’s not what’s being peddled here as fresh cowpies and calling it apple pie. It’s the fact that the media is trying to claim that women are effective leaders simply because of the vagina between their legs. Also your edit would have most people peg you as trolling at this point.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 11:00 PM
34

“Has a c**t?” This is where the term “pussypass” comes from. Agreed, what you have between your legs (especially today with over 60 genders) should not matter at all in your qualifications for a job that requires mental aptitude.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:52 PM
357

“Claiming that women are different to men because of their feminine intuition, their caring side or their gentle nature is an old and ugly form of sexism. Women are taking a leading role in fighting this virus, but not because they are biologically predisposed to do so.” Only a female reporter could say something so bold (aka right on the nose) these days. Kudos to her for calling out sexist bullshit for what it smells like.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 05:51 PM
5

My first question right off: “Do these dangerous jobs actually not hire enough women that could balance out the statistics, or is it that the majority of women either don’t want the job or are under-qualified for it? My money is on the latter, personally.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 04:17 PM
5

but damn, don't these women wanna ve able to relax abd be honest with their close ones? I mean damn You'd think so, but I wager the mentality of the majority of women who see sex as a profession probably have a hard time forming any sort of close bond (friendship or otherwise) with any other person, because they've taken the most intimate act in which two people can participate, and turned it into a meaningless (sans financially) transaction. Even if you met a chick and you were hitting it off a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 01:00 PM
2

We can only hope that’s the case here, but given the mindset of a lot of bluepilled guys out there, odds are also that he’s thinking, “I’m different, she wuves meee!”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 11:09 AM
3

I like that. Gonna use it too. Have my upvote.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 10:55 AM
3

I wasn’t. I thought that was pretty clear in my EDIT when I said, “To be clear, not shaming the guy”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 10:45 AM
7

I sincerely hope so. It’s nice to see the shoe on the other foot in this case.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 03:46 AM
14

There’s nothing racist about not wanting to be a cuck. A person’s racial preference in dating is their own, but if you expect someone of a different race to step in to “daddy’s shoes” and not feel socially awkward when everyone knows that can’t possibly be his kid, then you’re no better than the woman who picks that guy, not because she’s attracted to him, but because he’ll be her Billy BetaBux.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/04/20 03:43 AM
23

Supposedly he’s getting financial support from her to get his career off the ground. If he wasn’t such a delusional idiot on what his gf “actually” does with her SD, then I’d tip my hat to him for getting money out of her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 09:41 PM
58

Most important thing in either scenario is to call the act of whoring exactly what it is and not make lame ass excuses. If both people are okay with the arrangement, then there’s no problem, but for god sake (OP sugar baby) “woman up” and call yourself a prostitute (unless the cops are around, then call yourself an escort).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 09:34 PM
4

She’s a Type I Mudshark, no doubt
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 09:15 PM
3

It has to be to fit in with the rest of her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 09:12 PM
204

Meh, the guy is a blue-pilled idiot to think any man would pay for his gf’s “company” but not get actual sex out of the deal. Dude’s dating a whore (who’s supposedly helping pay for him launching his career). Here’s hoping he plans to jump ship once he’s off the ground. EDIT: To be clear, not shaming the guy or condoning the girl, but you really would have to live with your head in the sand to ignore the obvious here. EDIT2: Moderator comments have reminded me that, while the guy may be either a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 09:05 PM
3

Her waiting for the right guy is like waiting for a boat at a bus stop. Enjoy the ring, darling. Now you get to be the “man” in your “one-person” relationshit and handle all the stress, bills, making yourself happy, etc. Actually, I guess you’re a WGTOW, except you needed a ring to satisfy your princess hamster and somehow I doubt very highly that you’re seeking any sort of internal validation or self-actualization.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 08:53 PM
0

Wow, banned for technical feedback vs telling a woman to get off her high horse. There’s hope yet...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 08:47 PM
10

NSFW but couldn’t help myself
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 08:46 PM
10

Here you go: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mud%20shark Seen both types, but have known more than a few Type II’s myself.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 08:25 PM
2

I’m curious on how you do that. I’ve never done OLD, but I’m guessing in your case it’s like a drive-by “truth shooting” before they block you. Isn’t there also a concern of getting banned?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 08:19 PM
10

Classic projection. Everyone is guilty of it (at some points in our lives), but you see it in spades here.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 05:35 PM
27

Based on her 6-year-old fuck trophy (who sadly didn’t ask for this worthless shit of a mom), I’m guessing her type is Tyrone...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 05:34 PM
82

I mean she said it best herself, “I have a type, and you’re probably not it.” Yup. That type is Tyrone, so you’re disqualified either by race, attitude, or both.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/04/20 05:32 PM
2

Yeah, I think I’d rather pay more taxes...
/r/MensRights16/04/20 03:06 AM
2

Tell me again, in 2020, what single benefit there is for a heterosexual man to get married?
/r/MensRights16/04/20 01:22 AM
2

No, because I said the majority, which leaves the minority. EDIT: Also caught the alert on my phone before you changed this up. You'd asked if there was proof of more women preferring taller men. Do a google search on "studies that women prefer tall men" and you'll find quite a few articles. Here's the first one that came up for me: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201306/why-so-many-women-prefer-be-tall-men It's a good read, that points out not only the preference of …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/04/20 11:43 PM
6

I don’t think that’s the point here. The point is more on the height requirement (which the vast majority of women do have).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/04/20 11:16 PM
8

They wanted equality and it looks like they’ve got it. Time to take charge in a crisis, feminists. This is what you fought for, isn’t it? To have power and leadership in the name of equality. Wait wait... with them in charge, there’s suddenly a lack of leadership in Finland during the Coronavirus Pandemic? Are they all hiding in their safe spaces, waiting for someone else to do the hard work? EDIT: Link to the second article: https://www.helsinkitimes.fi/columns/columns/viewpoint/17439-fight-aga…
/r/MensRights13/04/20 10:58 PM
3

And nuttier than squirrel shit in October if she thinks being that blunt will work.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/04/20 03:19 AM
12

Yeah I ended up getting through the rest and loving the childish temper tantrum at the end. 😄
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/04/20 05:44 PM
20

“I forgive you for leaving.” Stopped at that point. Trying to make it his fault for walking out when she was the one who cheated, but also saying she forgives him for it. Bat. Shit. Crazy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/04/20 02:57 PM
7

On the upshot if you meet her for a coffee date she may be five minutes late, but her nose will arrive on time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/04/20 01:24 AM
14

Geezus, that is one sad, insecure little creature.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/04/20 06:34 PM
56

Women who post this kind of stuff (on tinder no less) are either trolling or are so delusional that it makes you wonder if their mom was binge drinking while she was pregnant with them.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/04/20 03:00 PM
4

“Literal Parasite” Not how I’d describe an unborn baby, but I think I could use it to describe her 9-month incubation period.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 09:49 PM
38

Asian here. Definitely not racist. Not racist at all (even if you weren’t black). If a woman has a particular racial preference that doesn’t align with her own race, it shows that her desire of race (while not good or bad on its own) is a very clear indicator of how far you’ll go if you don’t fall into that “racial profile.” Even if you do, it’s likely more a fetish attraction for her if those past relationships are numerous and short-lived. There’s a reason there are different races on this pla…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/20 06:16 PM
21

And vice versa.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/20 06:11 PM
13

An opinion that doesn’t seem to have any research to back up its wild claims. Typical trash.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:07 AM
7

So... you’re summing up a satiric post about generalizations, with your own tired generalization...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 08:28 PM
1

Another truth bomb dropped right here. This is why Chad and Tyrone make her wet; they’re in control and don’t give two raw fucks about what she wants. They set the schedule for sex; they don’t ask her when to drop by. They just tell her a time and she makes sure she’s available.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/03/20 06:51 PM
21

I think she just set a very interesting legal precedent. Powerless to stop herself = lacking free will Which translates to: she cannot have agency or responsibility. Meanwhile a man would never be able to use this excuse in the same capacity. Therefore in the eyes of legal society: women != men. Welp, time to reclassify women as children (legally speaking). Awfully sexist if you ask me, but we have to be fair and give equal treatment under the law.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 01:00 AM
6

Wait wait wait... you’re a woman?! 😱 I thought you were a troll... so much for that eh?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 11:26 PM
5

Sista, I’m here on this subreddit for the laughs, and I have to say, I’m not disappointed. You really are a treat. 😂
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 11:24 PM
3

You love trolling eh? Don’t quit your day job (assuming you even have one). Trying to put words in my mouth saying that I’m the one complaining, meanwhile you’re throwing a tantrum like a kid who shit her pants on the playground. This is amusing. By all means keep trying to “troll” me. 🤣
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 11:19 PM
6

Aww. You mad brah? Got an ax to grind, do ya? I never said all women were perfect (lord knows you prove that statement untrue in the first two sentences you wrote). All I said was it’s sad that so many dating profiles are just that shitty that it makes this satire have a hint of truth in it. Go on back to your safe space and have a cookie. Turn off the internet so the oh-so harsh opinions of others can’t hurt you. Cheers!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 11:10 PM
8

Sad that there’s a cheat sheet out? 😂 No, what’s sad is the vast majority of women’s dating profiles that end up posted here just prove how creepily accurate this satirical post really is.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 11:04 PM
3

Dunno how this was downvoted, but I righted that wrong. Esp love the height comment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/03/20 10:59 PM
6

Ever heard of "coming down with a cold"? You don't die from it, you just get it. I didn't wish death on anyone. I just hope they get what's coming to them for ignoring a fucking quarantine order for their bullshit "equality" movement. Go back to lurking, you were more pleasant that way.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:30 AM
5

So the silver lining to this dark cloud of doom is a lot of feminists will hopefully come down with it. EDIT: "coming down with it" doesn't mean dying from it, by the way, so get off with the "holier than thou!" crap.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 09:08 PM
2

Not to sound corny or cliche, but even Heroes get help from others now and then. No one said the journey had to be alone.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 04:02 PM
12

If you can’t be a real-life hero, there’s always a video game. Pathetic, but it rings true for some. To me, the real trick is to be your own hero. Don’t look for validation from others, but within yourself. Everyday when I wake up in the morning, I can look myself in the mirror and say, “You’re doing pretty good.” I work hard to make my life the best it can be. If you look yourself in the mirror, and the guy staring back at you looks like he needs to be saved... Be a hero and save him.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 08:54 PM
3

Damn. Guess we haven’t hit critical mass yet.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 04:37 PM
7

Maybe I haven’t checked the news enough lately (so keep me honest, fellow members), but since the Corona virus became “serious”, I haven’t seen many articles on feminist demands, complaints, and general bullshit. Funny how when there’s a real crisis at play (one that four generations has never dealt with on this scale before), they seem to be content to step back and let the men handle this.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 04:18 PM
-1

Spin on the asian slur “chink” but a chunky one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/03/20 06:32 PM
3

Honestly I think it’s filler, and the need to state the obvious, lest a “potential suitor” think she doesn’t have womanly (motherly) qualities. It’s also a way to shit test guys. If a woman wants to bang you and she has kids, she will find a way to ride your dick, whether that’s getting a sitter at the last minute or even locking the bedroom door while she puts on a movie for the rugrats (I think all of us have been there).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/03/20 06:30 PM
68

Her infant son has a rapper nickname, “Easy-E”... Soo did you name him after how easy it was for Tyrone to pump n dump you? Easy Exit?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/20 02:00 PM
4

Umm... because all the women are projecting their anger against the now MIA Chad who knocked em up and ran like hell. 😁
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/20 07:48 PM
4

Those nice guys tend to finish dead last. Here’s hoping he’s the exception.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/20 04:16 PM
3

Geezum crow! Six kids? That’s an order of magnitude greater than your standard Captain Save-A-Hoe...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/03/20 03:45 PM
3

Oh, I guess I was confused because you just posted that as an original comment so I wasn’t sure if you were referring to the OP or someone in the comments section
/r/MensRights11/03/20 11:56 PM
4

At present, I don’t see a single comment here that says (or even alludes) to him not being creepy. Your username checks out, so I’m curious why you said this.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 11:30 PM
1

Ah thank you! That makes this much more understandable and with the reference provided adds to the gravity of the situation. Hello again, Salem, Massachusetts. Is it 1692 already?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 10:37 PM
4

One? How about two?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/20 04:36 PM
6

Two kids at age 19 and trying to snag Beta Billy... To Billy: When the plane is in a nosedive with all engines on fire, don’t think you can pull it up before it becomes a fireball on the side of a mountain somewhere. Strap on your chute, and eject!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/20 04:35 PM
24

“‘Thousands of men are losing due process. I’m worried about this country,’ the disgraced Hollywood mogul said after two of his accusers confronted him in court.” I agree with this statement, but I’d like to know the context and details on why he said this.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:26 PM
7

Snowbunny? More like a walrus flossing its ass in that outfit.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/03/20 08:05 AM
17

My response would be: “In the year 2020, we need to give praise to an entire group of people based solely on what’s between their legs*? Sounds kinda sexist to me...”
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:20 PM
1

“Hoping” and “relishing” are not the same thing. I’m not saying I’d get personal satisfaction from her punishment, but I do hope she gets poetic justice.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:31 AM
2

Ummm... how about a title or basic description of what they’re promoting?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 01:52 AM
2

Link to the ad?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 12:48 AM
1

Now that got me thinking. If you wanna go full on “clown world” with this, now we need a separate day for each of the other 64 genders and counting...
/r/MensRights08/03/20 02:51 PM
2

Takes a big Redditor to post that. Cheers to you, mate. 😁🍺
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:43 PM
1

Actually it was. The point i was getting at is if we’re going to go nuts over this, then it best be for both men and women, but we all know that will never happen, so best to just do away with the whole idea in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:35 PM
3

I don’t. I just think the entire idea of a day dedicated to a group of people based solely on their genitals is absurd in this day and age. I guess I should go post on r/unpopularopinion and get my downvotes there.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:32 PM
3

This right here! In 2020 when we’re all supposed to be equal in merit, it’s ridiculous to have a day saying “You’re awesome!” because of what you were born with between your legs.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:31 PM
0

It has to do with the fact that we must recognize “greatness” based on what’s between a person’s legs. Kinda sexist to me....
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:27 PM
6

I know, and its shat on all the time by feminism
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:26 PM
0

Sadly its the radical feminists who complain about international men’s day and get it downplayed.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:25 PM
1

Here’s hoping while in prison, she learns what it means to cry “rape” and not be believed when it’s true. Those are gonna be a looong 16 months, honey.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:19 PM
0

Honestly we should just do away with it all together if they don’t like the idea of an international men’s day. EDIT: Per suggestion, I’m adding my reasons for doing away with IWD. It’s absurd that in this day and age, anyone should receive praise simply for what they were born with between their legs. Its more ridiculous to me to have days for women or men on this premise, so it should be done away with altogether. Hope that clears things up.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:13 PM
28

“I couldn’t hack it, so I’ll blame ThE pAtRiArChY for my failings.” I don’t even fully know her politics, but I hope she never holds a public office of any position ever again. This twatknuckle needs to just fade away into history... forever forgotten.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 03:25 AM
4

The reason you were banned is because that sub is insane. But if you want an actual reason, it's because you suggested that men should get equal treatment by a day of recognition. Haven't you heard? Feminism is not about equality. Also let's be real here. Not trying to hate; just being honest. If every woman walked off the job for one day at the same time, there'd be a situation. The economy would feel it and there would be some struggle. But... if all men walked off the job at the same time for…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 11:12 PM
3

They wanted equality until they got equality...
/r/MensRights06/03/20 11:06 PM
11

Good video. The top comments are just pure gold. Here's a few of my favs: I’ll be a gentleman as soon as women decide to be ladies again. When a woman refuses to give a man her best years then no man is obligated to be there for her worst. If women were so good at judging the quality of men there wouldn't be so many single mothers. The real question is: "Where all the debt-free, tatooless, virgins have gone?"
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:47 PM
4

The TL;DR for those lurking: Generally speaking, (so take your exceptions and stick ‘em someplace uncomfortable) women make less than men because they work fewer hours than men, and/or take jobs that that on average pay less than the jobs men take.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 05:35 PM
6

If a woman makes more than you, you’re on the short list to be replaced. I mean, she’s never truly yours; it’s just your turn. However, making less money means your turn is up that much sooner. Enjoy the sex while it lasts, ‘cause it won’t last long.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/03/20 05:06 PM
1

Swap the genders and then see if it bothers you more.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 11:21 AM
2

No, because that would force the state/government to step in as “daddy” to pay for raising the child. Very very few single mothers pay 100% of the costs of raising their kids. For the rest of them, they “don’t need no man” because they have the tax dollars of thousands of other men to pay their child care bills.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/20 11:17 AM
1

Yea it is, and the more people made aware of that fact, the more likely it is to change.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 11:49 PM
3

Looks like a pretty small group (less than 1,000 members). r/MensRights on the other hand has a larger following (I'm a member) and I'd be surprised if you were treated harshly in there unless of course there was evidence to the contrary. Do you happen to have a link to your post?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 08:57 PM
1

Your dad is the exception, and it seems he got off really lucky.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 08:53 PM
2

You're outraged, and that's good. The more people who are, the more likely this crap will change. Its the younger generations who need to see this bullshit for what it is; for they're the ones who can change the future (lest we not HAVE a future).
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 07:58 PM
8

The child is entitled to support from both biological parents. No. In the case of rape, the child is entitled to support from the state/government. Support should be paid by the rapist, and not by the victim. After all, the victim (in this case) is a child themselves. It's unfair to punish a child for a crime they didn't commit.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 06:58 PM
3

Don't forget the threat of going to prison if you can't get your act together. Because after all, doesn't EVERY child who just turned 18 have their entire life in order?
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 06:54 PM
5

What it boils down to is the government will avoid paying for single-mom crotch goblins at any cost. It doesn't matter if the "father" was a mere boy when he was forced to impregnate her. It doesn't matter if the adult dad is NOT the biological father, so long as his name is on the birth certificate. In fact, the supposed dad doesn't even have to be around when the mom puts his name down on the birth certificate. He could be in jail or who knows where else when conception, to pregnancy, and fina…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 06:48 PM
8

Oh the story I can tell you involving yours truly. I’ll edit this comment later when I’m at a computer, but yup you’re describing the classic “because vagina” reasoning of a lot of idiot judges out there. EDIT: Okay first off I realize I misread your last reply. My response of "because vagina" would actually be a reason why you likely wouldn't see a judge giving custody to the man even the woman has a crappy lifestyle. I'm living proof of this (sans the underage rape). I'll post a TL;DR at the e…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 05:33 PM
7

Yup, usually by all the guys who still don’t realize how fucked up things are for men when it comes to their treatment as “disposable” in a world of “equality”. Usually takes getting fucked over in the law or family court (or witnessing it happen to a bud) to wake them up.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 05:30 PM
13

You forgot that even if the victim wants 100% custody of his child (because who wants their child being raised by a sex offender), he’s highly unlikely to get it. Just flip the genders and imagine that shit flying in family court. As for Kansas law, I’m not a lawyer so I can’t speak to the matter, but I wager the answer is “yes, he would go to jail.” Are you angry yet? Not trolling, asking seriously. I want any feminist lurkers to see just how hypocritical they are when they claim feminism is fo…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 05:12 PM
30

It varies by country and by state, but pretty much yes. Oh but of course I’m probably just talking out of my “Patriarchal” ass. 😉 EDIT: I’d like to clarify that “no a woman cannot freely rape.” She would (hopefully) be punished for pedophilia, but she CAN still collect child support from her victim when he is of legal age.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 05:05 PM
76

Excellent. I think you'll find there are other examples out there (google is your friend). This is what really makes me laugh when feminists talk about "male privilege" with a straight face. They're full of shit, and a lot of them damn well know it. Make no mistake, Feminism has never been about true equality.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 04:51 PM
10

Why not? A 13 year old child cannot consent to sex. There's a law in place to protect children because they lack the maturity and agency.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 04:13 PM
33

All depends on the laws of the UK and municipality, but you're right. This has been written into law here in the USA.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 04:11 PM
50

Good. Embrace your anger. ;-) Jokes aside, I'm glad to see this outrage. The more people who get angry about this, the better chance there is for things to change. I've seen many women comment with the same incredulous response as yours when shown the live cases where this has been the case. We need EVERYONE to be angry enough to change this crap.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 04:08 PM
110

Not "they could lock you up", but "they WOULD lock you up". Before that, they would revoke your drivers license and garnish your wages. This is another injustice against men. We have people who run up massive amounts of debt, and they can escape it without any serious repercussions (debtors prison hasn't been a thing for a long time now), but you can STILL go to jail if you don't pay child support. EDIT: Also I say it's an injustice against men because, although this applies to women who neglect…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 04:00 PM
44

Yup, and this is why MRA exists. It’s also why MGTOW is growing. Guys are seeing that the game is rigged and they (rightly so) refuse to play. EDIT: This is only one of many reasons that drive MGTOW and MRA. It’s not the only issue, but it’s still a big one.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 03:15 PM
268

Depends on the country and local government, but here in the USA (depending on the state) he could be liable for child support retroactive from the day he turns 18 to the birth date of the child. EDIT: I want as many people as possible to be informed, so here's the case that made this atrocity into a law.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 11:34 AM
3

Proverbs... wow. Those who wrote this were saying (rather eloquently) what we say today, chapter and verse. This knowledge has been around for literally thousands of years and most of us have turned our backs on it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/20 02:17 AM
2

“I feel like there are no dealbreakers for girls.” How did she even say that with a straight face? In an era where a lot of these thots literally go by the mark of the devil: Men must be: 6 feet tall 6 pack abs 6 figure income No dealbreakers huh?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/20 06:59 PM
1

The comments killed that crosspost for me.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/20 06:20 PM
30

“How anyone could say taking us back to witch hunts and lynch mobs equals pulling us into the 21st Century is beyond me. It’s exactly what people said during the Satanic Panic, which started by the junk science of repressed/recovered memory syndrome,” wrote Twitter user @Tiffany44541244. Welp, couldn’t have said it better myself...
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:18 AM
7

Sounds like this “close” friend just put a lot of distance between you two. Be sure to send a “thank you” card with no return address.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:47 PM
14

Yup, only the woman is allowed to feel weak and vulnerable. We men are filled with so much “toxic masculinity” that we never need support.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:45 PM
44

“Don’t ask me anything.” FTFY Jokes aside, what exactly should I be asking a woman with such high caliber? Ever crack a cue stick over someone’s head? Where’s that crotch goblin’s father? By the way, “Out of the picture” is not an acceptable answer. What exactly are you bringing to the table, other than your “damn good” Pool skills and your single-mom status that’s a friggin anchor around your neck? Do you do anal?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/02/20 08:14 PM
1

This sounds more like a question for r/legaladvice, but I would guess that CPS could do it if they had a subpoena. I don’t think they have carte blanche authority to just review anyone’s camera footage without any legal backing.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 08:11 PM
23

Stone Cold. Have my upvote. 👍
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:32 PM
3

So you’re upset based on assumptions by others as to why you lost your custody battle? Fair enough. Do you happen to have the court transcript for review? My understanding is there are no court reporters in family court unless someone is smart enough (and has enough cash) to hire one of their own. Make no mistake that family courts are biased to favor women. I can attest to this myself when I fought for custody of my children. Their mother had been abusing prescription drugs, had failed a drug t…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:23 PM
0

This is more like, pussy whipped.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/02/20 05:58 PM
60

This meme should be reloaded to include sex robots instead of masturbatory aids (although technically a sex robot is a masturbatory aid, just more interactive). The second part would change from women calling the man a loser to them screaming about how all sex bots must be banned for the good of society and all that other bullshit. Link for context.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:54 PM
9

At least you’re aware of the issues now. The more people who become aware and acknowledge there’s a problem to be fixed, the more likely we can actually get the problem fixed.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:45 PM
4

Yet another one who stumbled not 20 feet out of the starting gate. Kids with two different racial dads; there’s no pretending to be a family for any guy who tried to date her. Honestly, I’d feel awkward hanging around her even as a friend (if she brought her kids along).
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/02/20 11:34 AM
3

I saved the entire post because of your comment. I plan to refer others to it whenever they try to challenge me that females don’t have privilege.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/02/20 12:16 AM
8

Cool. So I guess we should go after Liz for not having a big enough rack. Because clearly that would demonstrate her ability (or lack thereof) to make leadership decisions. We all know height and chest size are critical in defining a person’s character.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:21 PM
3

“Dad says it’s time to become someone else’s problem.” Even your old man doesn’t want to deal with you. Why exactly would I want that privilege?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/20 04:00 PM
7

If you look at cake the way you want men to look at you, then allow us all 50M of space while you pull the pin on that fat grenade.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/20 02:48 PM
20

More blue-pilled men who see this (and understand she’s full of shit), the more who will walk away from her kind. Pretty soon she’ll be crying: “WhErE aRe AlL mAh GuD mEnS?”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/20 02:46 PM
3

Be whole with yourself before trying to find another person to share in your life. If you have a passion, focus on that. Eventually a woman will come along and see that, but steer clear of her if she tries to divert you from that passion. You’ll be much happier in the long run.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 02:05 PM
2

Looks like she got her lips done too. Like a giant sphincter on her face.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 02:00 PM
2

Yup. Notice the selfie shot is from the phone looking down on the woman (you can tell because you see the floor in the background)? Classic camera angle to minimize ye olde double-chin.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/02/20 01:57 PM
5

It’s really not, but I was trying to go one step below the nuclear option of suggesting a potential divorce. The truth of the matter is there really isn’t a compromise that would satisfy everybody. There really is no middle ground here. Maybe getting a pet, but again that’s kind of a stretch.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 05:47 PM
22

“...everyone’s right to do what’s necessary to ensure they will not conceive a child they do not want to have.” Yup. “...no, your husband has not done anything wrong.” Gasp! Can’t believe they were allowed to publish this article. “I can’t tell if you would be happier divorcing your husband... “ Blah blah suggests nuclear option which would wreck the entire family rather than, oh I dunno... a compromise like say... adoption? Seriously, the respondent was doing pretty good up until that last part…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 12:25 PM
7

Mental harassment? So now we’re inside their heads (whether we chose to be or not), and its another form of harassment? Please, please, please let this be fake.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/02/20 03:25 PM
9

Al Bundy said it best...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/02/20 03:14 PM
10

Meh, agree to disagree. The Reddit sub has become trash, but the core philosophy is solid to me.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:26 AM
4

See my other comments below. I’m talking about MGTOW in general, not the shit show the Reddit sub has become.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 10:18 PM
44

I won’t deny that subreddit has gone to shit. However I mean the core of MGTOW which is basically: Self-actualization (aka, internal validation) Don’t marry or co-habitate. Date if you want and have kids at your own risk. Trouble is, you will get a lot of true incels hiding out there, and they’re gonna spread their angst.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 06:26 PM
302

Sooo MGTOW are against statutory rape, regardless of gender. Meanwhile, the rest of the world: MGTOW = Misogyny! Incels! Neckbeards!
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:09 PM
2

Don’t mind the red-headed step-troll. I wager he’s already slinked back under his bridge. ;)
/r/MensRights20/02/20 03:02 PM
1

I don’t disagree, but I say this here to ensure that the primary purpose is not revenge. Remember the old saying, “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.” If he were to make it clear to her that this is vindictive, it might spur her on to retaliate. If he just does it “for the sake of the child” she might not take it so hard. It’s all about winning the war, not the battle.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:46 PM
2

Unfortunately that was literally years ago (back when I first joined). I kinda wish I'd saved screenshots because (of course "moderator power abuse") she deleted all of my retorts to her arguments. For the troll in this thread (Redhedboi or whatever) who's been pitifully trying to start shit, they're correct in the clinical sense that humans are not a pair-bonding species. We're actually a tournament style species. However, when we talk about "pair bonding" for humans, it's meant in a different …
/r/MensRights20/02/20 03:09 AM
9

You don’t even know the context of the original point on which I discussed, yet you continue to attempt to insult me. You are so delusional of the “importance” of your own opinions. It’s quite pathetic.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 03:01 AM
7

Uh... you might want to check out the translation on the OP. This may not be a lack of dignity on his part, but a lack of common sense.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:54 AM
18

Nope. In fact the mod I debated back then challenged me in the same derisive and dismissive manner as you. She became increasingly frustrated as I presented research and studies to back up my point. Fortunately for me, you don’t have a ban hammer here. 😂
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:27 AM
40

R/sex is loaded with misandry. I was banned for pointing out (with references) issues on pair bonding for women with multiple sex partners. You won’t get an intellectual conversation there. It’s like asking a cat to explain the theory of relativity.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 12:07 AM
22

Or maybe: CGD Crotch Goblin Demands
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/20 08:49 PM
27

“Looking for friends 😆” The emoji at the end of that statement tells us all we need to know. You don’t want a friend, you want a walking wallet.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/20 08:33 PM
3

She said it best, “They just won’t stop.” I’m not a radical person, but I often think of TFM when he says, “Are you ready to take women’s rights away? Let me know when you’re ready. I’ll be waiting...” I don’t advocate for a blanket statement like that, but its radical feminists like the ones who wrote this bill, that make me think, “Maybe that’s not a bad idea.”
/r/MensRights19/02/20 07:40 PM
20

^ This right here. You have the evidence and you should have used it (for the sake of your child, not to be vindictive). You need to end this relationship with her quickly. This is only going to get worse. She’ll be all apologetic for now, but in the back of her mind, you failed her shit test and proved you’ll roll over to her tears.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 06:26 PM
13

Very informative!
/r/MensRights19/02/20 05:26 PM
37

Never mind her deluded expectations or that a well off man could get someone younger. Why would any man want to “work towards the same thing” when he’s essentially doing the majority of the work and could have it all ripped away the moment her tingles stop?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/20 04:27 AM
5

I don’t think this is a case of a pussypass denied, but it does reinforce that old saying: “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/20 12:34 AM
11

Video Consent? Sooo... this would make all women porn stars, whether they wanted to be one or not. Epic fail, Feminism!
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:19 PM
6

They aren’t little anymore. Per the article, both victims are now (at the time of the published article) 18 and 19 respectively. It’s clear that they (or the parents upon finding out) realized this is fucked up and that the perpetrator needs to be brought to justice.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/20 03:02 PM
5

Unpopular but very true. Have my upvote.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 12:29 AM
23

^ This right here. If you’re going to act like a child and want to be absolved from agency, then you get your rights stripped until you’re ready to be a full fledged adult who is responsible.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/20 01:51 AM
12

No idea, but yeah it’s time to start calling women out on this childish crap. The second commentor in that screenshot did a fine job.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/20 07:32 PM
5

Personally I’d want an apology and disciplinary action taken on the principal.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 07:10 PM
84

Yup, it’s an excuse for childish behavior and abandonment of responsibility. Just imagine if a woman tried this 100 years ago. Both men and women would scorn her, shame her, and tell her to grow the fuck up. We really are dealing with several generations of adult children.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/20 06:01 PM
15

Love seeing these feminist mouth-breathers called out on their bullshit. Seems to happen more and more lately, which gives me hope for the future.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/20 05:21 PM
308

Post partum hormones blah blah blah insert excuse for childish behavior here. Glad this got called out.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/20 05:18 PM
1

Frankly its better (for himself and for men’s rights) that he didn’t. But don’t worry. People like her will eventually meet someone who’s impulsive and beats the shit out of her.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:44 PM
2

If you look in the original subreddit, someone there posted a link to the story. Spoiler Alert: Cops came and the hateful bitch was taken away, but not before trying to turn the tables and say the guy had been harassing her.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:42 PM
1

Some parent needs to get their child in the yellow hat and put it down for a nap.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:36 PM
8

Everyone else has already pointed out the most glaring red flags, so I’ll just do a minor rant: WTF is up with that “LOL” at the end of a sentence? What are you, a 12 year old girl? Some women use it more often than a damn period/full stop at the end of a sentence.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/20 02:58 PM
62

Yeah if i was the father of one of those boys, I would round up the other boys’ parents and file a lawsuit. Lawyer up, bitch.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:10 AM
63

So now a pretty woman has the audacity to charge a man more than the price of a “Party-Pack ‘O Prostitutes” at a brothel in Vegas, and still hold out on the sex? I’m absolutely disgusted not at her hubris, but the fact that there are enough thirsty-ass simps out there who make this shit possible. For the love of christ, the men who support this trash are in dire need of a wake-up call.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/02/20 01:53 AM
1

They should put a cape on the bottle and call it: Captain Obvious Thanks for telling me, Absolut. I had no idea that buying someone a drink didn’t mean they owed me sex. Now I get why women cringe when I mention a coffee date and I offer to pay. 🤡 If I even drank vodka, rest assured I’d never drink yours again.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:37 PM
2

Did it hurt when you fell from heaven? 😂 Jokes aside, its an admirable position to take, but lets be honest here. The majority of people (men and women) do not take the act of sex as eloquently as you’ve described it. Many people from either sex would argue that they gave more than they got. I don’t agree that buying a drink equals sex, but at the same time, I do believe in equality in this regard. Unfortunately its a tough standard to enforce when one person (the woman) can not only insist the …
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:28 PM
21

But it does affect them. Men would no longer be indebted to women for sex. It’s all they have to keep men under their control. They’re scared to death of losing that power. They hide under the guise of concern for society, but if they really cared about society, they’d get laws changed to make marriage a better deal for men.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:20 PM
11

When the only valuable thing you can bring to the table is sex, you’ll naturally feel threatened when it can be made cheaper and better (and by better I mean no stds, or other drawbacks) by a robot. Sorry feminists, but the whole reason these bots exist is because men wanted a better deal than the current shit show. A demand creates a supply, after all. But no... go ahead and keep telling me how “the future is female”.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:16 PM
2

A guy who’s thoughtful and giving the benefit of the doubt? Eh, maybe. Maybe not. Doesn’t matter to me. 😉 EDIT: Found the white knight. Your attempts to troll are hilarious. 😂
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/02/20 01:22 AM
7

Your interpretation is ridiculous. I never said, “if only she tried to do better.” I said she should consider that perhaps some introspection is necessary to find out why she’s getting burned repeatedly in relationships.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 04:02 PM
17

Yup. The immature often tend to think lazy and generalize an entire group based on a few bad apples.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 02:52 PM
6

Giggity
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 02:22 PM
35

Exactly! Gotta have those tingles. And surprise, surprise, the “bad guys” (because lets face it, some bad guys do get married) give her those tingles by treating her like a postage stamp.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 02:09 PM
21

She does, but then immediately appears to break that self-reflection by whining like a petulant child: It shouldn’t be this hard! :’( Lemme break out my “World’s Smallest Violin”...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 02:00 PM
460

Not condoning the shitty behavior of those guys who are lying to her, but I think she needs to take a step back and ask what the other common denominator is in these failed relationships. Maybe... just maybe... she makes bad choices because she likes those types of guys. 🤔
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 12:04 PM
2

I reiterate: “younger generations”
/r/MensRights13/02/20 12:01 PM
10

It’s not a deal breaker that you’re pregnant, honey. Plenty of guys out there will happily nut it and punt it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/02/20 04:26 AM
2

Well said. You may find this interesting.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/02/20 11:12 PM
3

^ This right here. My old priest was once asked, “Why does God forgive all our sins without punishment or retribution?” His answer: “God need not punish you for your sins. Rest assured life will take care of that.”
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/02/20 11:08 PM
5

You nailed it and answered your own question. The thirst is real and the blue pilled mentality is still very much the norm these days. But, younger generations (women as well as men) are waking up to the Feminist lie that’s poisoned the last few generations. Stay aware, and spread that awareness to others.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/02/20 11:04 PM
6

HBC severely screws with a woman’s desires in a mate. Check out this post. Skip down to the part about HBC. The entire article is worth reading, though.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/02/20 10:57 PM
30

Good video. Gives me hope that younger generations are seeing and pointing out the hypocrisy of these cases. They’re the ones who can put the brakes on this crazy train.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:43 PM
5

But... I don’t like shitty corn on my pizza! 🤢
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 12:42 AM
6

Classic technicality to get someone else to pay. I reiterate, the state will go to any lengths necessary to avoid paying for a woman’s crotch goblin.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 08:08 PM
16

Can’t I just eat the pizza off her back while we do it? Honestly that’s what comes to mind when you see that pic.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/20 08:05 PM
1

Nope. Its two separate items. A judge would raise cain if I withheld support for the kids just because their mom is an ass. If I wanted to try for it, I’d have a lawyer contest it in court.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 02:07 PM
5

Depends on the country (obviously), but in the US it comes down to the agreement signed by the judge. In my situation, I owe two things to my ex: Child support (until my kids are both either 19, or have graduated HS, whichever comes first). 50/50 split on all medical costs (oh, and I’m required to provide healthcare coverage if offered by my employer). On number 2, you can bet she hasn’t paid shit towards their bills, which is why I scan and save every medical receipt, because one day she may de…
/r/MensRights09/02/20 01:23 PM
3

Wow. Never heard of PatronScan, but that gives me some insight into your original post. That is indeed scary.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 04:53 PM
8

So this girl hears about white knights and thinks, “By golly, I have two of them! Let’s have a joust!”
/r/MensRights08/02/20 02:01 PM
3

Thing is, closed circuit television cameras are a double-edged sword. Sure if they have facial recognition, its easier to accuse someone, but on the other hand, that means everything is recorded. Now there’s video evidence of the so-called “harassment” which (if it was just a comment as you used for example) wouldn’t have a leg to stand on in court. The judicial system is already overburdened, and I wager this kind of thing would be tossed right out. I don’t disagree that the definition of haras…
/r/MensRights08/02/20 01:59 PM
2

“Because you need relationship more than us.” Among a lot of things, you should haz grammar.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 04:51 AM
2

For all the times we berate these women for using photo filters... ... dear God I wish she used one! And of course all the other obvious self-entitlement crap.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/02/20 11:30 PM
41

I dunno. She might be the type who doesn’t like to take her work home with her. 😁
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/02/20 10:50 PM
1

“Cool. Just have the Uber/Lyft driver swing by my place after they pick you up.”
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/20 08:37 PM
1

I’m surprised you didn’t do a LMGTFY
/r/MensRights04/02/20 03:26 AM
1

Ah nice. Link?
/r/MensRights04/02/20 03:20 AM
1

Can you start your own?
/r/MensRights04/02/20 03:20 AM
18

Or when she’s asking you to loan some money because her crotch goblin needs more diapers.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:23 AM
3

For all the snowflakes who cry about gender roles, I say: “Take away the electricity for a week after a storm and tell me which genders are doing what jobs to get civilization up and running.” Or to coin a phrase by Bill Burr, “There are no Snowflakes in a house fire.”
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:20 AM
2

Do you have a petition of sorts to virtually sign? I think you can set up one at change.org.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:13 AM
13

You are absolutely the exception to the divorce-rape rule. Count yourself lucky.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/02/20 06:36 PM
7

Prior to the quarantine, they had over 100,000 subscribers.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/02/20 12:38 AM
29

Don’t try to apply logic and/or reason to a creature incapable of either. It’s a fool’s errand, like trying to teach a cat how to SCUBA dive with well-written instructions.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/02/20 10:04 PM
1

Quarantining them will likely only make the message stronger. If its “taboo”, the desire to see it only increases.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/02/20 04:19 PM
8

Might need to put an “ex” in front of that title...
/r/MensRights02/02/20 02:07 AM
21

My response: “I know what women deserve. I just don’t think they want it.”
/r/MensRights02/02/20 12:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter